Page last updated: 2024-11-07

tadalafil

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID110635
CHEMBL ID779
CHEBI ID71940
SCHEMBL ID33333
MeSH IDM0431130

Synonyms (144)

Synonym
AB00639969-08
ly-450190
cialis
adcirca
ic-351
gf-196960
CIA ,
6-benzo[1,3]dioxol-5-yl-2-methyl-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydro-pyrazino[1',2':1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione
MLS001424132
tadalafil ,
MLS000759426
smr000466321
1XOZ
DB00820
(6r,12ar)-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydro-2-methyl-6-(3,4-(methylenedioxy)phenyl) pyrazino(1',2':1,6)pyrido(3,4-b)indole-1,4-dione
(6r-trans)-6-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydro-2-methyl-pyrazino(1',2':1,6)pyrido(3,4-b)indole-1,4-dione
cialis (tn)
D02008
171596-29-5
adcirca (tn)
zalutia (tn)
tadalafil (jan/usp/inn)
pyrazino(1',2':1,6)pyrido(3,4-b)indole-1,4-dione, 6-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydro-2-methyl-, (6r-trans)-
ic 351
ic351
tadalafil [usan]
icos 351
pyrazino(1',2':1,6)pyrido(3,4-b)indole-1,4-dione, 6-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydro-2-methyl-, (6r,12ar)-
(6r,12ar)-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydro-2-methyl-6-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)pyrazino(1',2':1,6)pyrido(3,4-b)indole-1,4-dione
hsdb 7303
gf 196960
(2r,8r)-2-(2h-1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-6-methyl-3,6,17-triazatetracyclo[8.7.0.0^{3,8}.0^{11,16}]heptadeca-1(10),11(16),12,14-tetraene-4,7-dione
(6r,12ar)-6-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-2-methyl-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino[1,2,1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione
chembl779 ,
bdbm14777
MLS001165782
MLS001195644
HMS2051N17
chebi:71940 ,
tadalafil mylan
nsc-750236
nsc-759172
ly450190
trans-tadalafil
nsc750236
pyrazino[1',6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione, 6-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-2,3,6,7,12,12ahexahydro-2-methyl-, (6r,12ar)-
(6r,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydro-2-methyl-6-[3,4-(methylenedioxy)phenyl]pyrazino[1',2':1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione
(6r,12ar)-6-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydro-2-methylpyrazino[1',2':1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione
A23556
dtxcid7026786
dtxsid9046786 ,
tox21_112642
cas-171596-29-5
nsc759172
pharmakon1600-01505639
HMS2235L21
(6r,12ar)-6-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-2-methyl-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino[1',2':1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione
CCG-100973
tadanafil
CS-1414
1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl(methyl)[?]dione
nsc 750236
tadalafil [usan:inn:ban]
742sxx0ict ,
unii-742sxx0ict
nsc 759172
tadalafil lilly
S1512
AKOS015892559
(6r,12ar)-6-(benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)-2-methyl-2,3,12,12a-tetrahydropyrazino[1',2':1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4(6h,7h)-dione
gtpl7299
pyrazino(1',2':1,6)pyrido(3,4-b)indole-1,4-dione, 6-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydro-2-methyl-, (6r-12ar)-
tadalafil [hsdb]
tadalafil [orange book]
tadalafil [vandf]
entadfi component tadalafil
tadalafil [mi]
tadalafil [ep monograph]
tadalafil [usp monograph]
tadalafil component of entadfi
tadalafil [who-dd]
tadalafil [usp-rs]
tadalafil [jan]
tadalafil [ema epar]
tadalafil [inn]
tadalafil [mart.]
HY-90009A
MLS006010126
AB42193
NC00223
SCHEMBL33333
tox21_112642_1
NCGC00263909-02
KS-1117 ,
cialis, tadalafil
(6r,12ar) 6-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydro-2-methylpyrazino[1',2':1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione
(6r,12 ar)-6-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydro-2-methylpyrazino[1',2':1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione
(6r,12ar) 6-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydro-2-methylpyrazino [1',2':1,6] pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione
WOXKDUGGOYFFRN-IIBYNOLFSA-N
zalutia
(6r,12ar)-6-(benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)-2-methyl-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino[1',2':1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione
tadalafil(cialis)
AB00639969_10
AB00639969_09
(2r,8r)-2-(2h-1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-6-methyl-3,6,17-triazatetracyclo[8.7.0.0^{3,8}.0^{11,16}]heptadeca-1(10),11,13,15-tetraene-4,7-dione
(2r,8r)-2-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-6-methyl-3,6,17-triazatetracyclo[8.7.0.03,8.011,16]heptadeca-1(10),11,13,15-tetraene-4,7-dione
mfcd07771966
SR-05000001940-1
sr-05000001940
gf196960
tadalafil 1.0 mg/ml in acetonitrile
SW197603-2
tadalafil; cialis
Q424156
rel-(6r,12ar)-6-(benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)-2-methyl-2,3,12,12a-tetrahydropyrazino[1',2':1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4(6h,7h)-dione
171488-03-2
tadalafilo
tadalafila
tadalafil (cialis)
EX-A2644
1242099-07-5
AMY10321
BRD-K93645900-001-04-8
AR-270/43507798
6-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-2-methyl-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino[2',1':6,1]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione
HMS3884G19
(6r,12ar)-6-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydro-2-methylpyrazino[1,2:1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione
tadalafil specified impurity a
tadalafil (6r ,12as)- lilly
(-)-tadalafil (6r ,12as) diastereomer
(-)-tadalafil (6r)
tadalafil 100 microg/ml in acetonitrile
tadalafil- bio-x
BT164435
tadalafil (usp-rs)
tadalafil (ep monograph)
tadalafilum
g04be08
tadalafil (mart.)
tadliq
alyq
pyrazino
tadalafil (usp monograph)
Z1501485354

Research Excerpts

Overview

Tadalafil is a PDE5I which has been licensed for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) since 2003, is effective from 30 minutes after administration and its efficacy is maintained for up to 36 hours. It is an illegal additive in antifatigue supplements.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Tadalafil is a potential drug for reducing CDDP-induced spermatogenic dysfunction. "( Protective effects of tadalafil against cisplatin-induced spermatogenic dysfunction.
Chiba, K; Fujisawa, M; Ishida, T; Kaku, Y; Okada, K; Onishi, A; Sato, K, 2022
)
2.48
"Tadalafil is a selective phosphodiesterase type-5 (PDE5) inhibitor that is approved for the treatment of men with erectile dysfunction (ED) and/or benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) -associated symptoms. "( Tadalafil and Steroid Hormones Interactions in Adipose, Bone and Prostate Tissues: Focus on Translational Perspectives.
Antinozzi, C; Aversa, A; Di Luigi, L; Greco, EA; Sgrò, P, 2022
)
3.61
"Tadalafil is an illegal additive in antifatigue supplements. "( Terahertz spectroscopic detection of antifatigue illegal additives in health care product matrices.
Li, H; Li, Y; Liu, B; Pan, W; Xiao, H; Yang, L; Zhang, B, 2022
)
2.16
"Tadalafil is a PDE5I which has been licensed for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) since 2003, is effective from 30 minutes after administration and its efficacy is maintained for up to 36 hours. "( Tadalafil Once a Day for Men with Erectile Dysfunction: Is It Superior than On-Demand Administration?
Fadhly, SF; Felizio, J; Mantiri, BJ; Prasetyo, DT; Rahardjo, HE; Raharja, PAR; Rahman, IA; Ringoringo, DRL; Tambunan, MP, 2019
)
3.4
"Tadalafil (TDF), is a long-acting phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitor commonly used as treatment for erectile dysfunction."( Tadalafil alleviates cisplatin-induced reproductive toxicity through the activation of the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway and the inhibition of oxidative stress and apoptosis in male rats.
Abdel-Wahab, BA; Alkahtani, SA; Elagab, EAM, 2020
)
2.72
"Tadalafil is considered to be a promising drug for PE."( Effect and mechanism of prophylactic use of tadalafil during pregnancy on l-NAME-induced preeclampsia-like rats.
Cai, W; Chen, S; Li, Y; Niu, X; Wang, B; Yang, N, 2020
)
1.54
"Tadalafil (TDL) is an illegal additive drug found in drinks and functional foods that could threaten public health. "( Fluorescence based immunochromatographic sensor for rapid and sensitive detection of tadalafil and comparison with a gold lateral flow immunoassay.
Cui, G; Kuang, H; Liu, L; Suryoprabowo, S; Xu, C, 2021
)
2.29
"Tadalafil is an effective, reversible, and competitive phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor mainly used to treat erectile dysfunction. "( Pharmacokinetic and Bioequivalence Evaluation of 2 Tadalafil Tablets in Healthy Male Chinese Subjects Under Fasting and Fed Conditions.
Chen, JL; Hu, Y; Jiang, B; Lou, HG; Ruan, ZR; Shao, R; Yang, DD, 2022
)
2.42
"Tadalafil is a widely prescribed phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor that increases blood flow in other vascular territories."( Perfusion by Arterial Spin labelling following Single dose Tadalafil In Small vessel disease (PASTIS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Barrick, TR; Betteridge, S; Clarke, N; Haig, CE; Hainsworth, AH; Howe, FA; Isaacs, JD; Khan, U; Kruuse, C; Madigan, JB; Moynihan, B; Pauls, MMH; Pereira, AC; Rolfe, D; Rostrup, E; Trippier, S, 2017
)
1.42
"Tadalafil therapy is an effective therapeutic option in patients with ESRD who undergo HD, not only for the treatment of ED, but also for ejaculatory function, with acceptable adverse effects."( The efficacy of low-dose tadalafil in patients undergoing hemodialysis with end-stage renal disease.
Akdeniz, E; Aşcı, R; Bolat, MS; Cinar, O; Özer, İ, 2017
)
2.2
"Tadalafil is a promising phosphodiesterase (PDE) 5 inhibitor prescribed for erectile dysfunction (ED). "( Administration of daily 5 mg tadalafil improves endothelial function in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Amano, T; Earle, C; Imao, T; Kishikage, T; Matsumoto, Y, 2018
)
2.21
"Tadalafil is a selective phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor that dilates the maternal blood sinuses in the placenta, thereby facilitating the growth of the fetus."( Tadalafil treatment in mice for preeclampsia with fetal growth restriction has neuro-benefic effects in offspring through modulating prenatal hypoxic conditions.
Endoh, M; Furuhashi, F; Hosoda, H; Ikeda, T; Ikemura, K; Kamimoto, Y; Kaneda, MK; Kato, I; Kimura, T; Kondo, E; Ma, N; Magawa, S; Maki, S; Miyoshi, T; Nii, M; Okuda, M; Owa, T; Shimada, K; Tachibana, R; Tanaka, H; Tanaka, K; Tsuji, M; Umekawa, T; Yoshikawa, K, 2019
)
2.68
"Tadalafil is a safe and tolerable therapy and unlike α1- adrenoceptors and 5-alpha reductase inhibitors, which can cause sexual dysfunctions, tadalafil improves sexual function."( Tadalafil for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
De Nucci, G; Mónica, FZ, 2019
)
2.68
"Tadalafil is a clinically relevant drug that blocks phosphodiesterase 5 with high specificity and is used to treat erectile dysfunction."( Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibition improves contractile function and restores transverse tubule loss and catecholamine responsiveness in heart failure.
Becker, LK; Caldwell, JL; Church, SJ; Dibb, KM; Eisner, DA; Hutchings, DC; Kirkwood, GJ; Lawless, M; Madders, GWP; Pearman, CM; Radcliffe, EJ; Smith, CER; Taylor, RF; Trafford, AW; Unwin, RD; Woods, LS, 2019
)
1.24
"Tadalafil is a phosphodiesterase (PDE)-5 inhibitor that induces an increase in uterine blood flow by dilatation of blood vessels in cases of FGR with placental dysfunction, which improves FGR."( Phase-1 clinical study of tadalafil administered for selective fetal growth restriction in twin pregnancy.
Furuhashi, F; Ikeda, T; Kondo, E; Kubo, M; Magawa, S; Maki, S; Nii, M; Tanaka, H; Tanaka, K, 2021
)
1.64
"Tadalafil is a drug from the phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE-5) group, which is used to treat erectile dysfunction (ED), lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and ED with LUTS in patients with BPH. "( [Safety of tadalafil in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities].
Bulygin, KV; Galimov, SN; Galimova, EF; Gaysina, GG; Nikitina, IL; Pavlov, VN, 2019
)
2.35
"Tadalafil is a phosphodiesterase (PDE)-5 inhibitor recently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for lower urinary tracts symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). "( Tadalafil: a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor for benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Baye, J; Cantrell, MA; Vouri, SM, 2013
)
3.28
"Tadalafil is a phosphodiesterase type-5 (PDE5) inhibitor licensed for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) in adult males (Cialis-Lilly) and for the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (Adcirca-Lilly).(1) The 5mg tablet was licensed in November 2012 for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in adult males (Cialis 5mg-Lilly).(2) In this article, we consider the evidence for tadalafil and how its use fits with current management strategies for BPH. "( Tadalafil for benign prostatic hyperplasia.
, 2013
)
3.28
"Tadalafil is a potent and selective phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor that provides effective treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED). "( Regional cerebral blood flow following single-dose and continuous-dose tadalafil after stroke.
Lampl, Y; Lorberboym, M; Makhline, E, 2014
)
2.08
"Tadalafil is a long-acting and highly specific PDE5 inhibitor, which makes it the most attractive in its class for long-term management of patients with heart failure."( Tadalafil prevents acute heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in mice.
Chau, VQ; Hoke, NN; Kukreja, RC; Salloum, FN, 2014
)
2.57
"Tadalafil once daily is a viable alternative to as-needed PDE5I therapy in men with ED. "( Comparative efficacy of tadalafil once daily in men with erectile dysfunction who demonstrated previous partial responses to as-needed sildenafil, tadalafil, or vardenafil.
Baygani, S; Burns, P; Goldfischer, E; Kim, E; Seftel, A, 2015
)
2.17
"Tadalafil is a selective Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor that has been reported to have vasodilatory and antiproliferative effects on the pulmonary artery. "( Oral Tadalafil in Children with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
Ala, S; Babazadeh, K; Rafati, M; Saeedi, M; Shiran, M; Shiva, A; Zamani, H, 2016
)
2.39
"Tadalafil is a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor indicated for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. "( Tadalafil-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers using permeation enhancers.
Baek, JS; Cho, CW; Myung, CS; Pham, CV, 2015
)
3.3
"Tadalafil (TDF) is a Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) class II drug; the efficacy thereof is critically limited by inherent poor water solubility. "( Design of PVP/VA S-630 based tadalafil solid dispersion to enhance the dissolution rate.
Choi, JS; Park, JS, 2017
)
2.19
"Tadalafil is a phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitor that is used to treat male erectile dysfunction. "( Pulmonary embolism after tadalafil ingestion.
Chen, HC; Chuang, SH; Wang, CS; Wang, CY, 2008
)
2.09
"Tadalafil (Cialis)is a long-acting phosphodiesterase type-5 (PDE-5) inhibitor used to treat erectile dysfunction."( Tadalafil improves short-term memory by suppressing ischemia-induced apoptosis of hippocampal neuronal cells in gerbils.
Cho, HJ; Kim, BK; Kim, CJ; Kim, KH; Kim, SC; Kim, SE; Kim, SH; Kim, TS; Ko, IG; Shin, DH; Shin, MC; Shin, MS; Sung, YH, 2009
)
2.52
"Tadalafil is a selective phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) inhibitor approved for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. "( EEG abnormalities during treatment with tadalafil, a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor.
Akcin, S; Duman, T; Gorur, S; Guven, O; Melek, IM; Okuyucu, EE; Yilmazer, S, 2009
)
2.06
"Tadalafil is a long-acting, selective inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 5 that has been shown to be effective at treating men with ED."( Evaluation of patient expectations and treatment satisfaction after 1-year tadalafil therapy for erectile dysfunction: the DETECT study.
Belger, M; Heidler, H; Perimenis, P; Roos, E; Roumeguere, T; Schmitt, H, 2009
)
1.3
"Tadalafil is a long acting PDE-5 inhibitor largely unexplored for the treatment of iPAH."( Combination of sitaxentan and tadalafil for idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension following relapse on bosentan.
Faruqi, S; Fathi, H; Morice, AH, 2010
)
1.37
"Tadalafil is a novel long-acting inhibitor of phosphodiesterase-5. "( Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor, tadalafil, protects against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion through protein-kinase g-dependent generation of hydrogen sulfide.
Abbate, A; Chau, VQ; Hoke, NN; Kukreja, RC; Ockaili, RA; Salloum, FN; Toldo, S; Varma, A, 2009
)
2.08
"Tadalafil is a selective inhibitor of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP)-specific phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5). "( Protective effects of tadalafil on experimental spinal cord injury in rats.
Güven, EO; Oktar, S; Ozgiray, E; Serarslan, Y; Söğüt, S; Yilmaz, N; Yönden, Z; Yurtseven, T, 2010
)
2.12
"Tadalafil is a selective cyclic guanosine monophosphate-specific phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor that is effective in improving exercise ability, the time to clinical worsening and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) scores in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). "( Tadalafil: in pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Croxtall, JD; Lyseng-Williamson, KA, 2010
)
3.25
"Tadalafil is an effective and safe treatment for males with MS suffering from ED. "( Efficacy and safety of tadalafil for erectile dysfunction in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Del Popolo, G; Lombardi, G; Macchiarella, A, 2010
)
2.11
"Tadalafil is a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor that is characterized by low solubility and high permeability. "( In sight into tadalafil - block copolymer binary solid dispersion: Mechanistic investigation of dissolution enhancement.
Mehanna, MM; Motawaa, AM; Samaha, MW, 2010
)
2.16
"tadalafil). Rimonabant is a drug that was, at one time, approved for weight loss in Europe (although approval has been retracted), but not in the United States."( Identification of amino-tadalafil and rimonabant in electronic cigarette products using high pressure liquid chromatography with diode array and tandem mass spectrometric detection.
Allgire, J; Hadwiger, ME; Moore, T; Trehy, ML; Westenberger, B; Ye, W, 2010
)
1.39
"Tadalafil is an efficient drug used to treat erectile dysfunction characterized by poor water solubility, which has a negative influence on its bioavailability. "( Tadalafil inclusion in microporous silica as effective dissolution enhancer: optimization of loading procedure and molecular state characterization.
Mehanna, MM; Motawaa, AM; Samaha, MW, 2011
)
3.25
"Tadalafil is a selective inhibitor of phosphodiesterase type-5 (PDE-5) that was originally developed for the treatment of male erectile dysfunction and recently approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). "( Tadalafil for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Klinger, JR, 2011
)
3.25
"Tadalafil is a phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) inhibitor and it is used in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension and erectile dysfunction. "( Development and validation of a GC/MS method for the determination of tadalafil in whole blood.
Alevisopoulos, G; Athanaselis, S; Khraiwesh, A; Nikolaou, P; Papoutsis, I; Pistos, C; Spiliopoulou, C, 2011
)
2.05
"Tadalafil is a phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitor that was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2009 for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)."( Tadalafil: a long-acting phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Arif, SA; Poon, H, 2011
)
3.25
"Tadalafil (Cialis) is a potent phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor that is widely used to treat erectile dysfunction. "( Optical coherence tomography in tadalafil-associated retinal toxicity.
Bandello, F; Coscas, F; Coscas, G; Soubrane, G; Souïed, E; Zucchiatti, I,
)
1.86
"Tadalafil is an efficacious drug with a favorable side-effect profile and convenient mode of administration. "( Tadalafil for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Frey, MK; Lang, I, 2012
)
3.26
"Tadalafil is an oral phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor approved for PAH treatment. "( Tadalafil for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: a double-blind 52-week uncontrolled extension study.
Barst, RJ; Beardsworth, A; Botros, FT; Brundage, BH; Chan, M; Galiè, N; Ghofrani, HA; Oudiz, RJ; Simonneau, G, 2012
)
3.26
"Tadalafil is a selective cyclic guanosine monophosphate-specific phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor. "( Tadalafil: in the treatment of signs and symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia with or without erectile dysfunction.
Curran, MP, 2012
)
3.26
"Tadalafil appears to be an effective and a safe treatment option for patients with PAH."( Tadalafil as monotherapy and in combination regimens for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Schwarz, ER; Udeoji, DU, 2013
)
2.55
"Tadalafil is a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor in development by Lilly ICOS for the potential treatment of erectile dysfunction. "( Tadalafil Lilly ICOS.
Rotella, DP, 2003
)
3.2
"Tadalafil (Cialis) is a new agent that has been studied in different patient populations."( Tadalafil: a new agent for erectile dysfunction.
Brock, GB, 2003
)
2.48
"Tadalafil is a long-acting PDE-5 inhibitor, which is effective for up to 36 hr in the majority of men."( PDE-5 inhibition and sexual response: pharmacological mechanisms and clinical outcomes.
McKenna, KE; Rosen, RC, 2002
)
1.04
"Tadalafil 20 mg is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for ED that has a period of responsiveness of up to 36 hours."( Efficacy of tadalafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction at 24 and 36 hours after dosing: a randomized controlled trial.
Anglin, G; Giuliano, F; Padma-Nathan, H; Porst, H; Rosen, R; Varanese, L, 2003
)
2.14
"Tadalafil appears to be a safe and effective treatment for men with ED."( Efficacy and tolerability of tadalafil, a novel phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor, in treatment of erectile dysfunction.
Padma-Nathan, H, 2003
)
1.33
"Tadalafil is a potent, selective, reversible phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor under investigation for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). "( Cardiovascular effects of tadalafil in patients on common antihypertensive therapies.
Emmick, JT; Kloner, RA; Mitchell, M, 2003
)
2.06
"Tadalafil is a phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitor approved in >30 countries for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). "( A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover study of patient preference for tadalafil 20 mg or sildenafil citrate 50 mg during initiation of treatment for erectile dysfunction.
Ahuja, S; Denne, J; Govier, F; Kaufman, J; Kovalenko, P; Potempa, AJ, 2003
)
1.99
"Tadalafil (Cialis) is an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase type 5, which mediates relaxation of vascular smooth muscle in the corpus cavernosum thus facilitating erection. "( Efficacy and treatment satisfaction with on-demand tadalafil (Cialis) in men with erectile dysfunction.
Basson, BR; Breza, J; Calomfirescu, N; Chen, J; Kopernicky, V; Kula, K; Skoumal, R, 2004
)
2.02
"Tadalafil (TAD) is a new PDE5 inhibitor with a long half life that allows alternate day administration."( Chronic treatment with tadalafil improves endothelial function in men with increased cardiovascular risk.
Aversa, A; Fabbri, A; Fini, M; Rosano, GM; Spera, G; Vitale, C, 2005
)
1.36
"Tadalafil is a potent reversible phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor used for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. "( Determination of tadalafil in small volumes of plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection.
Cheng, CL; Chou, CH, 2005
)
2.11
"Tadalafil is a phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitor used for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). "( Determining the earliest time within 30 minutes to erectogenic effect after tadalafil 10 and 20 mg: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, at-home study.
Padma-Nathan, H; Pullman, W; Rosen, RC; Saikali, K; Shabsigh, R; Watkins, V, 2004
)
2
"Tadalafil is a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). "( Efficacy and safety of on-demand oral tadalafil in the treatment of men with erectile dysfunction in Taiwan: a randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled clinical study.
Chen, KK; Costigan, TM; Emmick, JT; Huang, ST; Jiann, BP; Ju-Ton, H; Lee, SS; Lin, JS; Su, CK; Wang, CJ, 2004
)
2.04
"Tadalafil is an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase type 5 used for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). "( Efficacy and safety of on-demand tadalafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction in South-East Asian men.
Chan, M; Cheong, NF; Ding, Q; Guo, YL; Lim, E; Pan, TM; Shen, W; Venugopalan, M; Wang, YX; Zhu, JC, 2006
)
2.06
"Tadalafil is an effective treatment for erectile dysfunction after 3DCRT for prostatic carcinoma with successful intercourse reported in almost 50% of the patients, and it is well tolerated."( A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study to assess the efficacy of tadalafil (Cialis) in the treatment of erectile dysfunction following three-dimensional conformal external-beam radiotherapy for prostatic carcinoma.
Hop, WC; Incrocci, L; Slagter, C; Slob, AK, 2006
)
2
"Tadalafil is a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor with documented efficacy in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED)."( A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of tadalafil 10 mg and 20 mg in Japanese patients with severe erectile dysfunction.
Fujimoto, K; Imaoka, T; Marumo, K; McGill, J; Stothard, D; Watts, S, 2007
)
2.04
"Tadalafil (Cialis) is a known oral selective phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor used widely in the management of erectile dysfunction. "( Tadalafil as an in vitro sperm motility stimulant.
Mostafa, T, 2007
)
3.23
"Tadalafil is an effective drug in treating erectile dysfunction (ED), and its clinical efficacy has been confirmed by a great many researches. "( [Efficacy of tadalafil for erectile dysfunction: an updated review].
Bai, WJ, 2007
)
2.15
"Tadalafil is an effective tool for treating ED in diabetes patients. "( Effect of tadalafil on erectile dysfunction in male patients with diabetes mellitus.
Antonijević, N; Dabetić, M; Dimitrijević-Srecković, V; Dordević, P; Gostiljac, D; Matanović, D; Milić, G; Nale, D; Nisić, T; Popović, S; Vujović, S, 2007
)
2.18
"Tadalafil is an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 5, approved for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. "( The cardiovascular safety of tadalafil.
Kieback, A; Kloner, RA; Reffelmann, T, 2008
)
2.08
"Tadalafil is a phosphodiesterase V inhibitor that is used for treatment of erectile dysfunction by enhancing vascular smooth muscle relaxation."( The effects of tadalafil on axial-pattern skin flap survival in rats.
Chang, H; Minn, KW; Oh, M, 2008
)
1.42
"Tadalafil is an effective treatment for ED in routine clinical practice. "( Therapeutic response after first month of tadalafil treatment predicts 12 months treatment continuation in patients with erectile dysfunction: results from the DETECT study.
Arver, S; Belger, M; Bitton, A; Roumeguère, T; Schmitt, H; Verheyden, B, 2008
)
2.05
"Tadalafil is a new and clinically available phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor that, aside from causing pulmonary vasodilation, has been shown to increase cardiac output in pulmonary hypertensive adults."( Tadalafil improves oxygenation in a model of newborn pulmonary hypertension.
Belik, J; Colvero, M; Fiori, H; Fiori, RM; Tessler, RB; Zadinello, M, 2008
)
2.51
"Tadalafil is an oral phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor for male erectile dysfunction (ED). "( [Evaluation of tadalafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction].
Liu, ZY; Sun, YH, 2008
)
2.14
"Tadalafil is an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase type 5, and is currently undergoing regulatory review in the US and in Europe. "( Tadalafil (Cialis) for men with erectile dysfunction.
Cartledge, J; Eardley, I, 2002
)
3.2

Effects

Tadalafil has a potentially preventive effect in treatment of cerebral vasospasm following subarachnoid bleeding. It has a higher stone expulsion rate than tamsulosin as a medical expulsive therapy for patients with distal stones from 5 to 10 mm without differences in side effects. Tadalafill has a potential for inhibiting neutrophil infiltration in renal IRI.

Tadalafil has been reported to exhibit antioxidant effects and is widely used in clinical practice to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia and erectile dysfunction. The drug has a higher stone expulsion rate than tamsulosin as a medical expulsive therapy for patients with distal stones.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Tadalafil has a higher stone expulsion rate than tamsulosin as a medical expulsive therapy for patients with distal stones from 5 to 10 mm without differences in side effects."( Tamsulosin vs. Tadalafil as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Artifon, ELA; Belkovsky, M; da Cruz, JAS; Otoch, JP; Passerotti, CC; Zogaib, GV,
)
1.93
"Tadalafil has a potential for inhibiting neutrophil infiltration in renal IRI."( Evaluation of Neutrophil Dynamics Change by Protective Effect of Tadalafil After Renal Ischemia/Reperfusion Using In Vivo Real-time Imaging.
Araki, M; Kashihara, N; Kidokoro, K; Maruyama, Y; Mitsui, Y; Nasu, Y; Sadahira, T; Sogawa, Y; Wada, K; Watanabe, M; Watanabe, T; Yoshinaga, K, 2022
)
1.68
"Tadalafil has a manageable safety profile up to an MTD of 40 mg/d."( Phase-1 clinical study of tadalafil administered for selective fetal growth restriction in twin pregnancy.
Furuhashi, F; Ikeda, T; Kondo, E; Kubo, M; Magawa, S; Maki, S; Nii, M; Tanaka, H; Tanaka, K, 2021
)
2.36
"Tadalafil has a significantly higher stone expulsion rate than tamsulosin when used as a medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones sized 5-10 mm. "( Tamsulosin versus tadalafil as a medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones: A prospective randomized study.
Acharya, GB; Basnet, RB; Kc, HB; Shah, AK; Shrestha, A; Shrestha, PM, 2016
)
2.21
"Tadalafil has a lowering affect on RI and PI in experimentally created PUUO."( Effect of tadalafil on renal resistivity and pulsatility index in partial ureteral obstruction.
Akgul, T; Aklan, Z; Ayyildiz, A; Bumin, A; Germiyanoğlu, C; Karaguzel, E; Kaya, M, 2009
)
2.2
"tadalafil has a potentially preventive effect in treatment of cerebral vasospasm following subarachnoid bleeding."( The effect of phosphodiesterase inhibitor tadalafil on vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorrhage in an experimental rabbit model.
Akalan, N; Bilginer, B; Isikay, AI; Narin, F; Onal, MB; Soylemezoglu, F, 2011
)
2.08
"Tadalafil has a greater affinity (10,000-fold) for PDE-5 compared with the other PDE inhibitors and has a t(½) of 17.5 hours."( Tadalafil: a long-acting phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Arif, SA; Poon, H, 2011
)
2.53
"Tadalafil has a longer duration of action than sildenafil and vardenafil."( Comparison of clinical trials with sildenafil, vardenafil and tadalafil in erectile dysfunction.
Doggrell, SA, 2005
)
1.29
"Tadalafil has a longer half-life than sildenafil or vardenafil, and a longer duration of action than sildenafil and vardenafil."( Do vardenafil and tadalafil have advantages over sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction?
Doggrell, S,
)
1.19
"Tadalafil has been reported to exhibit antioxidant effects and is widely used in clinical practice to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia and erectile dysfunction."( Protective effects of tadalafil against cisplatin-induced spermatogenic dysfunction.
Chiba, K; Fujisawa, M; Ishida, T; Kaku, Y; Okada, K; Onishi, A; Sato, K, 2022
)
1.76
"Tadalafil has positive effects on neurodevelopment and antioxidant defense system, but there is no information for its possible role during gestation on reflexive motor behavior in offspring. "( Parental exposure of Tadalafil has beneficial effect on reflexive motor behaviors in mice offspring.
Asghari, A; Hassanpour, S; Imani, MH; Khaksar, E, 2022
)
2.48
"Tadalafil has been demonstrated to improve vascular parameters."( Tadalafil Improves Haemodynamics and Arterial Stiffness but Not Flow- Mediated Dilation in Grade 1 Obesity. A Single-dose, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial.
Barocio-Pantoja, M; Cardona-Müller, D; Cardona-Muñoz, EG; González-Radillo, OI; Grover-Páez, F; Larios-Cárdenas, M; Trujillo-Quirós, J, 2022
)
2.89
"Tadalafil has a higher stone expulsion rate than tamsulosin as a medical expulsive therapy for patients with distal stones from 5 to 10 mm without differences in side effects."( Tamsulosin vs. Tadalafil as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Artifon, ELA; Belkovsky, M; da Cruz, JAS; Otoch, JP; Passerotti, CC; Zogaib, GV,
)
1.93
"As tadalafil has the potential to improve atherosclerosis, we evaluated the relationship between LUTS and endothelial function using FMD, and the effects of tadalafil."( [EVALUATING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS AND ENDOTHELIAL FUNCTION USING FLOW-MEDIATED DILATION, AND THE EFFECTS OF TADALAFIL].
Higashi, Y; Kuwahara, Y; Nakamura, K; Shimura, H; Takeda, M; Tsukamoto, T; Watanabe, N, 2020
)
1.27
"Tadalafil has a potential for inhibiting neutrophil infiltration in renal IRI."( Evaluation of Neutrophil Dynamics Change by Protective Effect of Tadalafil After Renal Ischemia/Reperfusion Using In Vivo Real-time Imaging.
Araki, M; Kashihara, N; Kidokoro, K; Maruyama, Y; Mitsui, Y; Nasu, Y; Sadahira, T; Sogawa, Y; Wada, K; Watanabe, M; Watanabe, T; Yoshinaga, K, 2022
)
1.68
"Tadalafil has been recently seen to also play a role in the treatment of urinary symptoms caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia."( Effectiveness of the addition of tadalafil to tamsulosin in the treatment of acute urinary retention in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: A randomized clinical trial.
Ameli, M; Ameli, Z; Baghani Aval, H, 2018
)
1.48
"Tadalafil has a manageable safety profile up to an MTD of 40 mg/d."( Phase-1 clinical study of tadalafil administered for selective fetal growth restriction in twin pregnancy.
Furuhashi, F; Ikeda, T; Kondo, E; Kubo, M; Magawa, S; Maki, S; Nii, M; Tanaka, H; Tanaka, K, 2021
)
2.36
"Tadalafil has demonstrated efficacy in treating both conditions."( Effects of tadalafil on lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia and on erectile dysfunction in sexually active men with both conditions: analyses of pooled data from four randomized, placebo-controlled tadalafil clinical stu
Esler, A; Porst, H; Roehrborn, CG; Secrest, RJ; Viktrup, L, 2013
)
1.5
"Tadalafil has regulatory approval for the treatment of men with signs/symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia with and without erectile dysfunction. "( Direct effects of tadalafil on lower urinary tract symptoms versus indirect effects mediated through erectile dysfunction symptom improvement: integrated data analyses from 4 placebo controlled clinical studies.
Brock, GB; Donatucci, C; McVary, KT; Ni, X; Roehrborn, CG; Viktrup, L; Watts, S; Wong, DG, 2014
)
2.18
"Tadalafil has modest symptomatic efficacy at best."( Tadalafil and benign prostatic hypertrophy. Too risky.
, 2014
)
2.57
"Tadalafil has a significantly higher stone expulsion rate than tamsulosin when used as a medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones sized 5-10 mm. "( Tamsulosin versus tadalafil as a medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones: A prospective randomized study.
Acharya, GB; Basnet, RB; Kc, HB; Shah, AK; Shrestha, A; Shrestha, PM, 2016
)
2.21
"Tadalafil has a lowering affect on RI and PI in experimentally created PUUO."( Effect of tadalafil on renal resistivity and pulsatility index in partial ureteral obstruction.
Akgul, T; Aklan, Z; Ayyildiz, A; Bumin, A; Germiyanoğlu, C; Karaguzel, E; Kaya, M, 2009
)
2.2
"tadalafil has a potentially preventive effect in treatment of cerebral vasospasm following subarachnoid bleeding."( The effect of phosphodiesterase inhibitor tadalafil on vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorrhage in an experimental rabbit model.
Akalan, N; Bilginer, B; Isikay, AI; Narin, F; Onal, MB; Soylemezoglu, F, 2011
)
2.08
"Tadalafil has a greater affinity (10,000-fold) for PDE-5 compared with the other PDE inhibitors and has a t(½) of 17.5 hours."( Tadalafil: a long-acting phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Arif, SA; Poon, H, 2011
)
2.53
"Tadalafil has been well tolerated."( Efficacy and tolerability of tadalafil, a novel phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor, in treatment of erectile dysfunction.
Padma-Nathan, H, 2003
)
1.33
"Tadalafil has a longer duration of action than sildenafil and vardenafil."( Comparison of clinical trials with sildenafil, vardenafil and tadalafil in erectile dysfunction.
Doggrell, SA, 2005
)
1.29
"Tadalafil has the longest duration of action (up to 36 hours); this feature can be both beneficial (greater sexual spontaneity) or possibly detrimental (greater exposure to drug, delayed adverse events)."( Clinical monograph for drug formulary review: erectile dysfunction agents.
Campbell, HE, 2005
)
1.05
"Tadalafil has not been investigated in a large clinical trial with a South-east Asian population."( Efficacy and safety of on-demand oral tadalafil in the treatment of men with erectile dysfunction in Taiwan: a randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled clinical study.
Chen, KK; Costigan, TM; Emmick, JT; Huang, ST; Jiann, BP; Ju-Ton, H; Lee, SS; Lin, JS; Su, CK; Wang, CJ, 2004
)
1.32
"Tadalafil has a longer half-life than sildenafil or vardenafil, and a longer duration of action than sildenafil and vardenafil."( Do vardenafil and tadalafil have advantages over sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction?
Doggrell, S,
)
1.19

Actions

Tadalafil therapy may enhance erectile function, improve anxiety, depression and quality of life. It is well tolerated by men with cirrhosis (CTP score < 10) and ED. The drug might inhibit kidney injury progression by preventing damage to podocytes and dysfunction of the glomerular filtration barrier.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Tadalafil therapy may enhance erectile function, improve anxiety, depression and quality of life; and is well tolerated by men with cirrhosis (CTP score < 10) and ED. "( Tadalafil improves erectile dysfunction and quality of life in men with cirrhosis: a randomized double blind placebo controlled trial.
Arora, V; Benjamin, J; Bhardwaj, A; Choudhary, A; Jagdish, RK; Jindal, A; Kamaal, A; Kumar, G; Kumar, M; Maiwall, R; Rajan, V; Sarin, SK; Shasthry, SM, 2023
)
3.8
"Tadalafil led to an increase in the NO levels, but a statistically significant NO release increase was found only at the highest dose and highest CPP."( Tadalafil in Increasing Doses: The Influence on Coronary Blood Flow and Oxidative Stress in Isolated Rat Hearts.
Banjac, NM; Jakovljević, VL; Prodanović, DV; Stilinović, NP; Tomas Petrović, AD; Vasović, LV; Vasović, VM, 2022
)
2.89
"Tadalafil might inhibit kidney injury progression by preventing damage to podocytes and dysfunction of the glomerular filtration barrier."( Protective effects of tadalafil on damaged podocytes in an adriamycin-induced nephrotic syndrome model.
Furukawa-Hibi, Y; Hotta, Y; Kataoka, T; Kimura, K; Naiki-Ito, A; Sanagawa, A; Takahashi, S; Tomita, N, 2022
)
1.76
"Tadalafil significantly promotes functional recovery after renal IR injury and effectively inhibits the induction of pro-inflammatory and inflammatory mediators. "( The Association of Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitor on Ischemia-Reperfusion Induced Kidney Injury in Rats.
Chung, MK; Kim, JH; Nam, JK; Park, SW, 2020
)
2
"Tadalafil improves lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) including nocturia. "( Tadalafil Improves Nocturia and Nocturia-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (KYU-PRO Study).
Eto, M; Mimata, H; Miyazato, M; Nishii, H; Oshiro, T; Saito, S; Sumino, Y; Takahashi, R; Yoshida, M, 2020
)
3.44
"Tadalafil did not inhibit spontaneous seminal emission or electrical field stimulation-induced seminal vesicle contraction in normal rats. "( Comparison of the Effects of Tadalafil and α
Fujimura, M; Fukui, T; Oka, M; Oyama, T; Yoshifuji, M; Yoshinaga, R, 2019
)
2.25
"Tadalafil displays important neuroprotective effects in experimental models of neurodegenerative diseases, however its mechanisms of action remain poorly understood. "( Tadalafil restores long-term memory and synaptic plasticity in mice with hepatic encephalopathy.
Araújo, SMR; Duarte-Silva, E; França, MER; Lós, DB; Oliveira, WH; Peixoto, CA; Ramos, RKLG, 2019
)
3.4
"Tadalafil can enhance Rituximab treatment efficacy by improving the microvascular permeability in mice brain lymphoma."( Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor Tadalafil increases Rituximab treatment efficacy in a mouse brain lymphoma model.
Chen, W; Liu, Y; Mao, Y; Meng, K; Qiao, X; Wang, R; Zhang, Q, 2015
)
1.42
"Tadalafil did not produce any significant change in MAP, whereas tempol led to a significant fall (p < 0.01) in MAP."( Long-acting phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor, tadalafil, and superoxide dismutase mimetic, tempol, protect against acute hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension in rats.
Fahim, M; Kotwani, A; Rashid, M, 2012
)
1.36
"Tadalafil improved lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH; LUTS/BPH) in clinical studies but has not been evaluated together with an active control in an international clinical study."( Monotherapy with tadalafil or tamsulosin similarly improved lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia in an international, randomised, parallel, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Cox, D; Giuliano, F; Mirone, V; Oelke, M; Viktrup, L; Xu, L, 2012
)
2.16
"Tadalafil group had lower rates of severe HAI compared with controls (4% vs 26%, p = 0.03), mostly because of decreased high-altitude pulmonary edema rates (4% vs 22%, p = 0.06)."( Tadalafil and acetazolamide versus acetazolamide for the prevention of severe high-altitude illness.
Caine, Y; Hermesh, H; Leshem, E; Maaravi, Y; Rosenberg, E; Schwartz, E,
)
2.3
"Tadalafil did not increase the rate of MI or cardiac mortality compared with reported rates from epidemiological studies."( Update on clinical trials of tadalafil demonstrates no increased risk of cardiovascular adverse events.
Costigan, TM; Emmick, JT; Jackson, G; Kloner, RA; Warner, MR, 2004
)
1.34
"Tadalafil promotes a mobilization of PCs and improves endothelial function in ED patients."( Circulating endothelial progenitor cells and endothelial function after chronic Tadalafil treatment in subjects with erectile dysfunction.
Caretta, N; De Toni, L; Ferlin, A; Foresta, C; Galan, A; Lana, A; Vinanzi, C,
)
1.08
"Tadalafil did not increase baseline flux (81.0+/-73.0 vs 91.3+/-114.0 arbitrary unit (AU), P=0.57), E(max) (280.0+/-107.6 vs 279.5+/-119.8 AU, P=0.94), ET(50) (25.4+/-4.4 vs 26.6+/-5.7 degrees C, P=0.62), or ET(90) (21.2+/-3.9 vs 21.8+/-5.0 degrees C, P=0.78), (cycle 1 values presented)."( The effects of tadalafil on cold-induced vasoconstriction in patients with Raynaud's phenomenon.
Friedman, EA; Harris, PA; Kurnik, D; Stein, CM; Wood, AJ, 2007
)
1.41

Treatment

Tadalafil treatment normalized the low response to papaverine and high drop rate in the intracavernosal pressure measured by cavernosometry after CNR. Treatment significantly improved all domains of the IIEF from baseline, including the erectile function domain (change = 8.8, end point = 21.6; P < 0.001)

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Tadalafil treatment was able to decrease in hypertrophy and improve the LV function restoring cardiac function."( Tadalafil treatment improves cardiac, renal and lower urinary tract dysfunctions in rats with heart failure.
Andrade, DR; Claudino, MA; Goncalves, TT; Janussi, SC; Krikorian, K; Mora, AG; Priviero, FBM, 2022
)
2.89
"The tadalafil-treated groups were orally administered 10 mg/kg tadalafil for 2 weeks."( Protective effects of tadalafil on damaged podocytes in an adriamycin-induced nephrotic syndrome model.
Furukawa-Hibi, Y; Hotta, Y; Kataoka, T; Kimura, K; Naiki-Ito, A; Sanagawa, A; Takahashi, S; Tomita, N, 2022
)
1.52
"TheTADAlafil treatment for Fetuses with early-onset growth Restriction: multicentrer, randomizsed, phase II trial (TADAFER II) study showed the possibility of prolonging the pregnancy period in cases of early-onset fetal growth restriction; however, it was an open-label study. "( Tadalafil treatment for fetuses with early-onset growth restriction: a protocol for a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase II trial (TADAFER IIb).
Aoki, S; Aoki, Y; Endo, M; Ikeda, T; Kasai, M; Kawamura, H; Kikuchi, N; Kinjo, T; Kotani, T; Kotera, M; Maegawa, Y; Maki, S; Nagao, K; Nakamura, K; Nakata, M; Nii, M; Nishimura, Y; Ogura, T; Sekizawa, A; Suga, S; Takakura, S; Takano, M; Tamaru, S; Tanaka, H; Tanaka, K; Tanaka, Y; Ushida, T; Yasuhi, I; Yasui, O; Yoshida, Y, 2022
)
2.79
"Tadalafil treatment improves OAB symptoms and urodynamic parameters by decreasing oxidative stress level."( Efficacy of Tadalafil Therapy and Changes in Oxidative Stress Levels in Male Patients with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Overactive Bladder.
Araki, K; Matsuo, T; Miyata, Y; Mukae, Y; Ohba, K; Otsubo, A; Sakai, H, 2020
)
2.38
"The tadalafil treatment was only protective for cellular degeneration (p = 0.140)."( Comparison of the protective effects of sildenafil, vardenafil and tadalafil treatments in ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat ovary.
Akalın, EE; Anğın, AD; Basak, K; Cikman, MS; Kaptanagasi, AO; Sakin, O, 2019
)
1.23
"Tadalafil treatment is safe for pregnant women with HDP. "( Tadalafil treatment for preeclampsia (medication in preeclampsia; MIE): a multicenter phase II clinical trial.
Endoh, M; Furuhashi, F; Ikeda, T; Kaneda, MK; Kimura, T; Kotani, T; Magawa, S; Maki, S; Nii, M; Nishimura, Y; Ogura, T; Sekizawa, A; Tanaka, H; Tanaka, K; Tsuji, M, 2021
)
3.51
"Tadalafil 5mg daily treatment for 3 months did not result in significant modifications to VPS and AS. "( [Effect of tadalafil 5mg daily treatment on penile haemodynamics in patients with erectile dysfunction].
Gasanz, C; Moreno-Mendoza, D; Peraza, MF; Ruiz-Castañé, E; Sánchez-Curbelo, J; Sarquella, J; Villegas, JF,
)
1.96
"Tadalafil treatment significantly suppressed the severity of the lesions."( Effect of tadalafil on chronic pelvic pain and prostatic inflammation in a rat model of experimental autoimmune prostatitis.
Kurita, M; Numakura, Y; Oka, M; Okamoto, K; Yamaguchi, H, 2018
)
1.6
"Tadalafil treatment for PE with FGR reduced the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-2α in the placenta and in the brain of the FGR fetus."( Tadalafil treatment in mice for preeclampsia with fetal growth restriction has neuro-benefic effects in offspring through modulating prenatal hypoxic conditions.
Endoh, M; Furuhashi, F; Hosoda, H; Ikeda, T; Ikemura, K; Kamimoto, Y; Kaneda, MK; Kato, I; Kimura, T; Kondo, E; Ma, N; Magawa, S; Maki, S; Miyoshi, T; Nii, M; Okuda, M; Owa, T; Shimada, K; Tachibana, R; Tanaka, H; Tanaka, K; Tsuji, M; Umekawa, T; Yoshikawa, K, 2019
)
2.68
"Tadalafil can be a treatment option in cases where there is concern about negative effects on seminal emission."( Comparison of the Effects of Tadalafil and α
Fujimura, M; Fukui, T; Oka, M; Oyama, T; Yoshifuji, M; Yoshinaga, R, 2019
)
2.25
"Tadalafil treatment increased bladder blood flow, and nicotine-treated rats had increased voiding interval and micturition volume."( Nicotine-induced hypoxia in rat urothelium deteriorates bladder storage functions.
Domen, T; Imamura, T; Ishizuka, O; Minagawa, T; Nagai, T; Ogawa, T; Suzuki, T; Ueno, M, 2019
)
1.24
"Tadalafil treatment regulated the inflammation signaling pathways restoring learning and spatial memory."( Tadalafil restores long-term memory and synaptic plasticity in mice with hepatic encephalopathy.
Araújo, SMR; Duarte-Silva, E; França, MER; Lós, DB; Oliveira, WH; Peixoto, CA; Ramos, RKLG, 2019
)
2.68
"Tadalafil treated bladders measured lower collagen content towards the end of the study, indicating an antifibrotic effect."( Urodynamic improvements following oral medical therapy for partial bladder outlet obstruction in an animal model.
Maciejewski, CC; Metcalfe, PD; Tredget, EE, 2015
)
1.14
"Tadalafil treatment in this setting appears to have an antifibrotic effect."( Urodynamic improvements following oral medical therapy for partial bladder outlet obstruction in an animal model.
Maciejewski, CC; Metcalfe, PD; Tredget, EE, 2015
)
1.14
"The tadalafil treatment improved erectile function (P = 0.0028), but had no effect on the inhibitory effects of serum from ED patients on the CACs and CFUs derived from healthy men."( Tadalafil treatment had a modest effect on endothelial cell damage and repair ability markers in men with erectile dysfunction and vascular risk.
Amicarelli, F; Barbonetti, A; D'Andrea, S; D'Angeli, A; Falone, S; Francavilla, F; Francavilla, S; Necozione, S; Pelliccione, F; Pezzella, A,
)
2.05
"Tadalafil treatment reversed this effect."( The effect of methamphetamine on an animal model of erectile function.
Davies, KP; Martinez, LR; Nosanchuk, JD; Tar, MT, 2014
)
1.12
"Tadalafil-treated diabetic mice demonstrated significantly improved left ventricular function, which is associated with increased cardiac SIRT1 activity."( Chronic inhibition of phosphodiesterase 5 with tadalafil attenuates mitochondrial dysfunction in type 2 diabetic hearts: potential role of NO/SIRT1/PGC-1α signaling.
Aluri, HS; Koka, S; Kukreja, RC; Lesnefsky, EJ; Xi, L, 2014
)
1.38
"Tadalafil treatment was well tolerated and significantly reduced both MDSCs and Treg concentrations in the blood and in the tumor (P < 0.05)."( Tadalafil reduces myeloid-derived suppressor cells and regulatory T cells and promotes tumor immunity in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Borrello, I; Califano, J; De la Fuente, AC; Gomez, C; Nazarian, R; Reis, IM; Sargi, Z; Serafini, P; Vella, JL; Weed, DT, 2015
)
2.58
"AI-tadalafil rats were treated with tadalafil (2 mg/kg/day) orally for 8 weeks after AI."( Protective effect of tadalafil on the functional and structural changes of the rat ventral prostate caused by chronic pelvic ischemia.
Andersson, KE; Nomiya, M; Sawada, N; Zarifpour, M, 2015
)
1.25
"Tadalafil treated mice traveled less distance in the center and the mean speed of tadalafil treated aged mice was significantly lower than the tadalafil treated young mice in open field test."( Tadalafil enhances working memory, and reduces hippocampal oxidative stress in both young and aged mice.
Al-Amin, MM; Alam, MA; Alam, T; Didar, RR; Hasan, AT; Hasan, SM; Hossain, I; Rahman, MM, 2014
)
2.57
"In tadalafil-treated podocytes, we examined the interaction between H2S and nitric oxide (NO)."( Tadalafil Integrates Nitric Oxide-Hydrogen Sulfide Signaling to Inhibit High Glucose-induced Matrix Protein Synthesis in Podocytes.
Choudhury, GG; Feliers, D; Gorin, Y; Kasinath, BS; Lee, HJ; Mariappan, MM; Sataranatarajan, K, 2015
)
2.37
"Tadalafil treatment resulted in greater IPSS improvements in men with lower baseline estradiol-17β versus those with higher baseline estradiol-17β."( Do baseline estrogen and testosterone affect lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) prior to or after pharmacologic treatment with tadalafil?
Egan, KB; McVary, K; Miner, MM; Ni, X; Roehrborn, CG; Rosen, RC; Suh, M; Wittert, G; Wong, DG, 2015
)
1.34
"Tadalafil-treated men had 2.8 times significantly increased adjusted odds of being combined responders vs non-responders (P < 0.001)."( Erectile dysfunction and lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) combined responders to tadalafil after 12 weeks of treatment.
Egan, KB; Miner, MM; Ni, X; Roehrborn, CG; Rosen, RC; Wong, DG, 2016
)
1.36
"Tadalafil treatment had a protective effect against the formation of urethral stricture in rabbit model. "( Effect of Tadalafil on Prevention of Urethral Stricture After Urethral Injury: An Experimental Study.
Aktas, C; Bozdemir, Y; Kurt, O; Ozcaglayan, O; Yazici, CM; Yesildag, E, 2016
)
2.28
"Tadalafil treatment also markedly increased local blood flow and the density of FITC-dextran perfused vessels in the sciatic nerve concomitantly with increased intraepidermal nerve fiber density."( Tadalafil Promotes the Recovery of Peripheral Neuropathy in Type II Diabetic Mice.
Chopp, M; Jia, L; Lu, M; Lu, X; Szalad, A; Wang, L; Zhang, RL; Zhang, ZG, 2016
)
2.6
"Tadalafil treatment improved golden retriever muscular dystrophy histopathological features, decreased levels of the cation channel TRPC6, increased total threonine phosphorylation status of TRPC6, decreased m-calpain levels and indicators of calpain target proteolysis, and elevated levels of utrophin."( Tadalafil Treatment Delays the Onset of Cardiomyopathy in Dystrophin-Deficient Hearts.
Forbes, SC; Hammers, DW; Shima, A; Sleeper, MM; Sweeney, HL; Walter, GA, 2016
)
2.6
"Tadalafil treatment reduced the upregulation of mRNA levels of fibrosis markers, the decrease of bladder compliance and the increase of collagen concentration at the late phase of SCI."( Effects of an alpha1A/D-adrenoceptor antagonist, naftopidil, and a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, tadalafil, on urinary bladder remodeling in rats with spinal cord injury.
Kadekawa, K; Kawamorita, N; Majima, T; Mori, K; Okada, H; Sugaya, K; Tyagi, P; Yoshimura, N; Yoshizawa, T, 2017
)
1.39
"Tadalafil treatment significantly attenuated these effects."( Erectile dysfunction in a murine model of sleep apnea.
Gozal, D; Lei, Z; Nozdrachev, AD; Rao, CV; Shah, ZA; Soukhova-O'Hare, GK, 2008
)
1.07
"Tadalafil treatment improved short-term memory by suppressing ischemia-induced apoptotic neuronal cell death in the hippocampal CA1 region, and decreased cGMP level."( Tadalafil improves short-term memory by suppressing ischemia-induced apoptosis of hippocampal neuronal cells in gerbils.
Cho, HJ; Kim, BK; Kim, CJ; Kim, KH; Kim, SC; Kim, SE; Kim, SH; Kim, TS; Ko, IG; Shin, DH; Shin, MC; Shin, MS; Sung, YH, 2009
)
2.52
"Tadalafil-treated animals exhibited greater Pao(2) throughout the course of reperfusion (P = .001) Mean pulmonary artery pressure was lower in tadalafil-treated animals (22 vs 40 mm Hg; P = .04)."( Long-acting oral phosphodiesterase inhibition preconditions against reperfusion injury in an experimental lung transplantation model.
Baumgartner, WA; Champion, HC; Shah, AS; Weiss, ES; Williams, JA, 2009
)
1.07
"Tadalafil treatment accelerated Akt phosphorylation in cardiac tissue and decreased myocyte apoptosis."( Long-acting phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor, tadalafil, induces sustained cardioprotection against lethal ischemic injury.
Ahmad, N; Ali, AK; Ashraf, M; Wang, Y, 2009
)
1.34
"tadalafil treatment across four distinct geographies: Asia, Australia/New Zealand (ANZ), Central Eastern Europe/Middle East (CEE/ME), and Latin America (LA)."( Timing of dose relative to sexual intercourse attempt in previous sildenafil citrate users treated with tadalafil: a geographical comparison from a single arm, open-label study.
Abdo, CH; Gallagher, GL; Glina, S; Hernandez-Serrano, R; Lenero, E; Rampazzo, C; Rubio-Aurioles, E; Sotomayor, M; West, TM, 2009
)
1.29
"Tadalafil treatment significantly improved the IPSS obstructive subscores (tadalafil 2.5, 5, 10, 20 mg with percentage changes of 24%, 31%, 33%, 33%, respectively) vs placebo (13%)."( Changes in peak urinary flow and voiding efficiency in men with signs and symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia during once daily tadalafil treatment.
Auerbach, SM; Elion-Mboussa, A; Kaminetsky, JC; Montelongo, RM; Roehrborn, CG; Viktrup, L, 2010
)
1.29
"Tadalafil treatment was found effective."( [Treatment of erectile dysfunction of neurogenic genesis with inhibitors of phosphodiesterase of type 5 in patients with diabetes mellitus].
Kurbatov, DG; Rozhivanov, RV,
)
0.85
"Tadalafil treatment improved the anastomotic bursting pressure and the hydroxyproline concentration in both normal and ischemic small intestine anastomosis."( The effect of tadalafil on anastomotic healing in ischemic small intestine in rats.
Ayhan, S; Coskun, T; Kara, E; Kaya, Y; Sakarya, A; Var, A, 2010
)
2.16
"Tadalafil treatment significantly improved IIEF-5 score, SEP2 and SEP3 of both groups of the patients (P < 0.01). "( [Nocturnal penile tumescence and the effect of tadalafil on erectile dysfunction].
Bai, WJ; Gu, XE; Wang, XF; Xiao, F; Yan, ZA, 2010
)
2.06
"Tadalafil 20-mg treatment significantly improved sexual function in patients who were taking serotonin reuptake inhibitors for depression, with mild to moderate, well-tolerable adverse events."( Efficacy and tolerability of tadalafil for treatment of erectile dysfunction in men taking serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
Alma, E; Evliyaoğlu, Y; Kobaner, M; Saygılı, M; Yelsel, K, 2011
)
2.1
"Both tadalafil and tempol pretreatment partially prevented (p < 0.01) the rise in CO due to hypoxia."( Long-acting phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor, tadalafil, and superoxide dismutase mimetic, tempol, protect against acute hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension in rats.
Fahim, M; Kotwani, A; Rashid, M, 2012
)
1.1
"Tadalafil treatment was associated with significant improvements in ejaculatory function, orgasmic function and sexual satisfaction. "( Effects of 12 weeks of tadalafil treatment on ejaculatory and orgasmic dysfunction and sexual satisfaction in patients with mild to severe erectile dysfunction: integrated analysis of 17 placebo-controlled studies.
Bolyakov, A; Paduch, DA; Polzer, PK; Watts, SD, 2013
)
2.14
"Tadalafil treatment improved the metabolic status and reduced infarct size compared to the untreated db/db mice (21.2±1.8% vs 45.8±2.8%; p<0.01)."( Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor tadalafil attenuates oxidative stress and protects against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in type 2 diabetic mice.
Das, A; Koka, S; Kukreja, RC; Salloum, FN, 2013
)
1.4
"Tadalafil-treated patients had a significantly greater positive response rate on the GAQ in all subpopulations analyzed compared with placebo-treated patients (P<0.03) except for the tadalafil 10 mg cardiovascular subpopulation (placebo, 46.8%; tadalafil 10 mg, 71.0%; P=0.127)."( The efficacy of tadalafil in clinical populations.
Ahuja, S; Eardley, I; Lewis, RW; O'Leary, M; Sadovsky, R; Seftel, A; Shen, W; Walker, DJ; Wang, WC; Wong, DG, 2005
)
1.4
"Tadalafil treatment significantly improved SEP3 and IIEF EF domain scores. "( Tolerance to the therapeutic effect of tadalafil does not occur during 6 months of treatment: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in men with erectile dysfunction.
Bradley, JD; Carson, CC; Fischer, CJ; Florio, VA; McMahon, CG; Wang, WC, 2006
)
2.05
"Tadalafil-treated patients reported a significantly greater improvement in the mean percentage of successful penetrations (tadalafil: 34.5 +/- 4.1; placebo: -4.6 +/- 8.1) and successful intercourse attempts (tadalafil: 52.2 +/- 3.8; placebo: 16.8 +/- 7.8) than placebo-treated patients as measured by the Sexual Encounter Profile."( Efficacy of tadalafil in Egyptian and Turkish men with erectile dysfunction.
Beheiry, A; Esen, A; Kadioglu, A; Khalaf, I; Kopernicky, V; Saylan, M; Shoair, KZ; Wang, WC, 2006
)
1.43
"Tadalafil treatment normalized the low response to papaverine and high drop rate in the intracavernosal pressure measured by cavernosometry after CNR compared with sham-operated rats. "( Chronic daily tadalafil prevents the corporal fibrosis and veno-occlusive dysfunction that occurs after cavernosal nerve resection.
Ferrini, MG; Gonzalez-Cadavid, N; Kovanecz, I; Rajfer, J; Rambhatla, A; Sanchez, S; Vernet, D, 2008
)
2.15
"Tadalafil treatment significantly improved all domains of the IIEF from baseline, including the erectile function (EF) domain (change = 8.8, end point = 21.6; P < 0.001). "( Tadalafil is efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) in men over 65 years of age: results from Multiple Observations in Men with ED in National Tadalafil Study in the United States.
Goldfischer, E; Hakim, LS; Natanegara, F; Sharlip, ID; Shumaker, BP; Wong, DG, 2008
)
3.23
"Cotreatment with tadalafil and JQ-1 synergistically reduced YAP/TAZ protein expression, suppressed proliferation and induced G0-G1 arrest of cultured HCC cells."( Tadalafil enhances the therapeutic efficacy of BET inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma through activating Hippo pathway.
Gong, W; Jiang, Y; Kong, D; Liu, H; Miao, X; Wu, Z, 2021
)
2.39
"Treatment with tadalafil improved these adverse effects."( Protective effects of tadalafil against cisplatin-induced spermatogenic dysfunction.
Chiba, K; Fujisawa, M; Ishida, T; Kaku, Y; Okada, K; Onishi, A; Sato, K, 2022
)
1.38
"Treatment with tadalafil significantly improved their nocturia after 4 weeks, and these improvements were maintained for the 12-week treatment period."( Tadalafil Improves Nocturia and Nocturia-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (KYU-PRO Study).
Eto, M; Mimata, H; Miyazato, M; Nishii, H; Oshiro, T; Saito, S; Sumino, Y; Takahashi, R; Yoshida, M, 2020
)
2.34
"Treatment with tadalafil decreased prostate weight and PBR in a dose-dependent manner, and improved prostatic blood flow and tissue levels of MDA, IL-6, TGF-β1, and bFGF in SHRs, without affecting the blood pressure."( Protective effects of tadalafil on prostatic hyperplasia in spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Higashi, Y; Kamada, S; Kataoka, T; Nagao, Y; Saito, M; Shimizu, S; Shimizu, T, 2020
)
1.21
"The treatment with tadalafil inhibited the excessive proliferation of IPAH-PASMCs in a concentration-dependent manner with an IC"( Tadalafil induces antiproliferation, apoptosis, and phosphodiesterase type 5 downregulation in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension in vitro.
Fujitomi, E; Ohara, N; Sato, M; Tsukamoto, K; Yamamura, A; Yamamura, H, 2017
)
2.22
"Treatment with tadalafil, an inhibitor of type 5 phosphodiesterase, by oral gavage 1 hour post-exposure and then once daily thereafter, attenuated systemic blood pressures, decreased inflammation, ameliorated pulmonary and cardiac injury, and improved maternal survival (from 36% to 80%) and fetal growth."( Mechanisms and Treatment of Halogen Inhalation-Induced Pulmonary and Systemic Injuries in Pregnant Mice.
Aggarwal, S; Ambalavanan, N; Bradley, WE; Carlisle, MA; Dell'Italia, L; Doran, S; Ford, DA; Jilling, T; Lam, A; Lambert, JA; Matalon, S; Patel, RP; Ren, C, 2017
)
0.79
"The treatment with tadalafil 2 hours after the micro-neurosurgical lesions reduced the experimental MOFS lesions development, in a highly significant level (P<0.01) of 58.75%."( Tadalafil: Protective Action against the Development of Multiple Organ Failure Syndrome.
Bian, K; Botelho, PHH; Murad, F; Oliveira, GG; Oliveira, MAB; Oliveira, SAH,
)
1.89
"Treatment with tadalafil 5 mg once daily effectively relieves lower urinary tract symptoms based on objective improvement of storage and voiding function, such as detrusor overactivity and bladder outlet obstruction, in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia."( Effects of tadalafil on storage and voiding function in patients with male lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia: A urodynamic-based study.
Funahashi, Y; Gotoh, M; Kato, M; Majima, T; Matsukawa, Y; Matsuo, K; Yamamoto, T, 2018
)
1.22
"Treatment with tadalafil and verapamil decreased the MDA level in treatment groups and also observed a significant change in sperm parameters between Sham and other groups."( Protective effect of tadalafil and verapamil on testicular function and oxidative stress after torsion/detorsion in adult male rat.
Ameli, M; Hashemi, MS; Moghimian, M; Shokoohi, M, 2018
)
1.14
"Pretreatment with tadalafil protected against TAA-induced liver fibrosis, in a dose-dependent manner, as proved by the alleviation of inflammatory and fibrotic biomarkers."( The anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic effects of tadalafil in thioacetamide-induced liver fibrosis in rats.
Abdel-Salam, RM; Ahmed, NA; Mansour, HM; Salama, AAA; Yassen, NN; Zaki, HF, 2018
)
1.06
"Treatment with tadalafil or vardenafil significantly suppressed oxLDL receptor (LOX-1) expression."( PDE5 inhibitors blunt inflammation in human BPH: a potential mechanism of action for PDE5 inhibitors in LUTS.
Carini, M; Cellai, I; Comeglio, P; Filippi, S; Gacci, M; Maggi, M; Maneschi, E; Morelli, A; Nesi, G; Santi, R; Sebastianelli, A; Serni, S; Vignozzi, L, 2013
)
0.73
"Treatment with tadalafil once daily significantly improved erectile function in men with mild to mild-moderate impairments in erectile function following PRN PDE5 inhibitor treatment."( A return to normal erectile function with tadalafil once daily after an incomplete response to as-needed PDE5 inhibitor therapy.
Burns, PR; Goldfischer, ER; Kim, ED; Ni, X; Seftel, AD, 2014
)
1.02
"Pretreatment of tadalafil significantly attenuated the above effects of ischemia-reperfusion injury."( Neuroprotective effect of tadalafil, a PDE-5 inhibitor, and its modulation by L-NAME in mouse model of ischemia-reperfusion injury.
Gulati, P; Singh, N, 2014
)
1.04
"Treatment with tadalafil 2.5mg or 5mg once daily was well tolerated and resulted in clinically important improvements in patients with mild (54.3% and 74.8%, respectively), moderate (51.3% and 63.1%, respectively), or severe (33.7% and 44.5%, respectively) ED."( Tadalafil once daily in men with erectile dysfunction: an integrated analysis of data obtained from 1913 patients from six randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies.
Boess, F; Büttner, H; Gacci, M; Henneges, C; Porst, H, 2014
)
2.2
"Pre-treatment with tadalafil inhibited both basal and PDGF-induced migration of bladder smooth muscle cells."( Tadalafil effect on metabolic syndrome-associated bladder alterations: an experimental study in a rabbit model.
Carini, M; Cellai, I; Comeglio, P; Filippi, S; Gacci, M; Maggi, M; Maneschi, E; Morelli, A; Sarchielli, E; Vannelli, GB; Vignozzi, L, 2014
)
2.16
"Pretreatment with tadalafil mimicked the neuroprotective effects of iPoCo."( Tadalafil enhances the neuroprotective effects of ischemic postconditioning in mice, probably in a nitric oxide associated manner.
Gulati, P; Singh, N, 2014
)
2.17
"Co-treatment with tadalafil decreased the number of VT (0.85 ± 0.53) and MC (0.76 ± 0.22) compared with L-NAME group."( Effects of chronic administration of tamsulosin and tadalafil, alone or in combination, in rats with bladder outlet obstruction induced by chronic nitric oxide deficiency.
Cerqueira, JB; Gonzaga-Silva, LF; Jamacaru, FV; Moraes, MO; Regadas, RP; Reges, R; Sucupira, DG,
)
0.71
"Treatment with tadalafil in aged mice improves working memory than the corresponding tadalafil treated young mice in radial arm maze test."( Tadalafil enhances working memory, and reduces hippocampal oxidative stress in both young and aged mice.
Al-Amin, MM; Alam, MA; Alam, T; Didar, RR; Hasan, AT; Hasan, SM; Hossain, I; Rahman, MM, 2014
)
2.18
"Pretreatment with tadalafil reduced the absolute urinary excretion of KIM-1, but not of NGAL."( Effects of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor on ischemic kidney injury during nephron sparing surgery: quantitative assessment by NGAL and KIM-1.
Abassi, Z; Awad, H; Hussein, O; Khamaisi, M; Lahoud, Y; Matar, I; Nativ, O; Shalabi, A, 2015
)
0.74
"Treatment with tadalafil reduced pulse pressure (P=0.0179), systolic blood pressure (P=0.001) and diastolic blood pressure (P=0.054) and increased aortic distensibility (P=0.001) and aortic strain (P=0.003) in the ED group."( Evaluation of arterial stiffness and cardiac function in patients with vascular erectile dysfunction: acute effects of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor tadalafil.
Aydinlar, A; Baran, I; Güllülü, S; Keçebaş, M; Kiliçarslan, H; Özdabakoğlu, O; Sağ, S; Şentürk, T; Tütüncü, A, 2017
)
0.99
"Treatment with tadalafil resulted in significant improvements in International Prostate Symptom Score (mean difference between treatments -4.2, p < 0.001)."( Urodynamic effects of once daily tadalafil in men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized, placebo controlled 12-week clinical trial.
Dmochowski, R; Kaminetsky, J; Klise, S; Kraus, S; Roehrborn, C; Xu, L, 2010
)
0.98
"Treatment with tadalafil once daily for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia showed no negative impact on bladder function as measured by detrusor pressure at maximum urinary flow rate or on any other urodynamic parameter assessed. "( Urodynamic effects of once daily tadalafil in men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized, placebo controlled 12-week clinical trial.
Dmochowski, R; Kaminetsky, J; Klise, S; Kraus, S; Roehrborn, C; Xu, L, 2010
)
0.99
"Treatment with tadalafil was generally well tolerated, with adverse events that were transient in nature and of mild to moderate intensity."( Tadalafil: in pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Croxtall, JD; Lyseng-Williamson, KA, 2010
)
2.14
"Treatment with tadalafil increased significantly EPCs in both responders and poor responders."( New immunophenotype of circulating endothelial progenitor cells and endothelial microparticles in patients with erectile dysfunction and metabolic syndrome: effects of tadalafil administration.
La Vignera, S, 2011
)
0.9
"Pretreatment with tadalafil significantly inhibited the acrolein-induced hyperactivity of both fibres."( Inhibitory effects of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor, tadalafil, on mechanosensitive bladder afferent nerve activities of the rat, and on acrolein-induced hyperactivity of these nerves.
Aizawa, N; Igawa, Y; Minagawa, T; Wyndaele, JJ, 2012
)
0.95
"Treatment with tadalafil resulted in significant improvements in International Prostate Symptom Score (mean difference between treatments -4.2, p <0.001)."( Urodynamic effects of once daily tadalafil in men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized, placebo controlled 12-week clinical trial.
Dmochowski, R; Kaminetsky, J; Klise, S; Kraus, S; Roehrborn, C; Xu, L, 2013
)
1.01
"Treatment with tadalafil once daily for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia showed no negative impact on bladder function as measured by detrusor pressure at maximum urinary flow rate or on any other urodynamic parameter assessed. "( Urodynamic effects of once daily tadalafil in men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized, placebo controlled 12-week clinical trial.
Dmochowski, R; Kaminetsky, J; Klise, S; Kraus, S; Roehrborn, C; Xu, L, 2013
)
1.02
"Treatment with tadalafil 10 or 20 mg was associated with significant increases in ejaculatory and orgasmic function (vs placebo) across all baseline ED, EjD, and OD severity strata."( Effects of 12 weeks of tadalafil treatment on ejaculatory and orgasmic dysfunction and sexual satisfaction in patients with mild to severe erectile dysfunction: integrated analysis of 17 placebo-controlled studies.
Bolyakov, A; Paduch, DA; Polzer, PK; Watts, SD, 2013
)
1.04
"Treatment with tadalafil significantly improved all primary efficacy variables, regardless of baseline HbA(1c) level."( Effects of tadalafil on erectile dysfunction in men with diabetes.
Anglin, G; Emmick, JT; Knight, JR; Sáenz de Tejada, I, 2002
)
1.04
"Men treated with tadalafil compared with placebo reported greater mean changes from baseline on the erectile function domain score (9.3 vs 0.3 with placebo, p <0.001) and on the mean per patient percentage of successful penetration (SEP question 2, 31.6% vs 2.3% with placebo, p <0.001) and successful intercourse attempts (SEP question 3, 43.6% vs 3.5% with placebo, p <0.001). "( The efficacy and safety of tadalafil in United States and Puerto Rican men with erectile dysfunction.
Ahuja, S; Knapp, PM; Seftel, AD; Shin, J; Wang, WC; Wilson, SK, 2004
)
0.96
"Treatment with Tadalafil determined a significant increase in PCs (P < 0.001) and FMD (P < 0.001) with respect to basal level."( Circulating endothelial progenitor cells and endothelial function after chronic Tadalafil treatment in subjects with erectile dysfunction.
Caretta, N; De Toni, L; Ferlin, A; Foresta, C; Galan, A; Lana, A; Vinanzi, C,
)
0.7
"Treatment with tadalafil at a dose of 2 or 10 mg/kg significantly improved neurological functional recovery compared with saline-treated rats."( Tadalafil, a long-acting type 5 phosphodiesterase isoenzyme inhibitor, improves neurological functional recovery in a rat model of embolic stroke.
Chopp, M; Cui, Y; LaPointe, MC; Silver, B; Zhang, L; Zhang, RL; Zhang, Z, 2006
)
2.12
"Treatment with tadalafil decreased the number of apoptotic cells and increased the phosphorylation of the 2 survival associated kinases Akt and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2."( Tadalafil increases Akt and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 activation, and prevents apoptotic cell death in the penis following denervation.
Klausner, AP; Lysiak, JJ; Son, H; Steers, WD; Tuttle, JB; Yang, SK, 2008
)
2.13

Toxicity

Tadalafil was well tolerated, and headache and dyspepsia were the most frequent adverse events. Maternal adverse events in all doses were recorded as at least one grade 1 adverse event. The main treatment-emergent adverse events are mild or moderate in severity, transient and reversible, which may disappear without drug withdrawal.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Tadalafil was well tolerated, and headache and dyspepsia were the most frequent adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of tadalafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: results of integrated analyses.
Anglin, G; Brock, GB; Chen, KK; Costigan, T; McMahon, CG; Shen, W; Watkins, V; Whitaker, S, 2002
)
1.54
" - The development of the PDE-5 inhibitors vardenafil and tadalafil prompts the question of whether and how these three substances differ in terms of their efficacy and adverse effects."( Erectile dysfunction: comparison of efficacy and side effects of the PDE-5 inhibitors sildenafil, vardenafil and tadalafil--review of the literature.
Gleiter, CH; Gresser, U, 2002
)
0.77
" In the present trial, the starting 10mg dose of tadalafil could be increased to 20mg if the patient could not achieve satisfactory intercourse or reduced to 5mg for an adverse event that was persistent, intolerable and judged by the investigator to be related to tadalafil."( Long-term safety and tolerability of tadalafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction.
Casabé, A; Denne, J; Jünemann, KP; Knight, J; Meuleman, E; Moncada, I; Montorsi, F; Pacheco, C; Segal, S; Valiquette, L; Verheyden, B; Watkins, VS, 2004
)
0.85
" Tadalafil was safe and well tolerated."( Long-term safety and tolerability of tadalafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction.
Casabé, A; Denne, J; Jünemann, KP; Knight, J; Meuleman, E; Moncada, I; Montorsi, F; Pacheco, C; Segal, S; Valiquette, L; Verheyden, B; Watkins, VS, 2004
)
1.51
"Tadalafil at doses of 5, 10, or 20mg taken as needed up to once daily for 18 to 24 months was safe and well tolerated."( Long-term safety and tolerability of tadalafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction.
Casabé, A; Denne, J; Jünemann, KP; Knight, J; Meuleman, E; Moncada, I; Montorsi, F; Pacheco, C; Segal, S; Valiquette, L; Verheyden, B; Watkins, VS, 2004
)
2.04
" The most frequent adverse events were headache, dyspepsia, back pain and myalgia."( The efficacy and safety of tadalafil: an update.
Carrier, S; Carson, CC; Cordell, WH; Denne, JS; Eardley, I; Rajfer, J; Shen, W; Walker, DJ, 2004
)
0.62
" The most common treatment emergent adverse events were headache (15."( The efficacy and safety of tadalafil in United States and Puerto Rican men with erectile dysfunction.
Ahuja, S; Knapp, PM; Seftel, AD; Shin, J; Wang, WC; Wilson, SK, 2004
)
0.62
" The most common treatment-emergent adverse events more frequent (>2%) with tadalafil than placebo were headache, dyspepsia, flushing, back pain, pain in limb and myalgia."( Efficacy and safety of tadalafil in a Western European population of men with erectile dysfunction.
Austoni, E; Beardsworth, A; Eardley, I; Gentile, V; Hackett, G; Lembo, D; Wang, C, 2004
)
0.86
" Efficacy was assessed by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP), and Global Assessment Question (GAQ); patient and partner treatment satisfaction by the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) and SEP; and safety by adverse events, laboratory values, and vital signs."( Efficacy, safety, and treatment satisfaction of tadalafil versus placebo in patients with erectile dysfunction evaluated at tertiary-care academic centers.
Carson, C; Fredlund, P; Kuepfer, C; Murphy, A; Segal, S; Shabsigh, R, 2005
)
0.58
" Mild or moderate headache, dyspepsia, and myalgia were the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events reported."( Efficacy, safety, and treatment satisfaction of tadalafil versus placebo in patients with erectile dysfunction evaluated at tertiary-care academic centers.
Carson, C; Fredlund, P; Kuepfer, C; Murphy, A; Segal, S; Shabsigh, R, 2005
)
0.58
" The most common treatment-emergent adverse events--headache and dyspepsia--were generally mild or moderate."( A 6-month study of the efficacy and safety of tadalafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study in Australian men.
Fredlund, P; Jesudason, DR; Lording, DW; Lowy, MP; McMahon, CG; Murphy, A; Palmer, NR; Shin, J; Stuckey, BG; Sutherland, PD; Wittert, GA, 2005
)
0.59
" Those safe and effective agents were originally developed for their cardiovascular effects and were incidentally found to enhance erections."( Cardiac safety in clinical trials of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors.
Carson, CC, 2005
)
0.33
" Treatment-emergent adverse events were generally mild or moderate."( Efficacy and safety of oral tadalafil in the treatment of men in Canada with erectile dysfunction: a randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Anglin, G; Beasley, CM; Brock, GB; Carrier, S; Pommerville, PJ; Shin, J; Whitaker, S, 2005
)
0.62
" Treatment with on-demand tadalafil or daily tadalafil was well tolerated, and headaches, facial flushing, and dyspepsia were the most frequently observed adverse events."( Comparison of efficacy, safety, and tolerability of on-demand tadalafil and daily dosed tadalafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction.
McMahon, C, 2005
)
0.87
" Daily tadalafil was well tolerated with headache, dyspepsia, and facial flushing as the most frequent adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of daily tadalafil in men with erectile dysfunction previously unresponsive to on-demand tadalafil.
McMahon, C, 2004
)
1.07
" Therefore, men with ED may be at increased risk for cardiovascular adverse events."( Update on clinical trials of tadalafil demonstrates no increased risk of cardiovascular adverse events.
Costigan, TM; Emmick, JT; Jackson, G; Kloner, RA; Warner, MR, 2004
)
0.61
"The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the cardiovascular adverse events in clinical trials of tadalafil, an effective medication for the treatment of ED."( Update on clinical trials of tadalafil demonstrates no increased risk of cardiovascular adverse events.
Costigan, TM; Emmick, JT; Jackson, G; Kloner, RA; Warner, MR, 2004
)
0.83
"An integrated analysis of cardiovascular adverse events was performed on a database from 35 controlled clinical trials (placebo [N = 2,118] and tadalafil [N = 5,228]) and eight open-label trials of tadalafil (tadalafil [N = 6,939])."( Update on clinical trials of tadalafil demonstrates no increased risk of cardiovascular adverse events.
Costigan, TM; Emmick, JT; Jackson, G; Kloner, RA; Warner, MR, 2004
)
0.82
"In 35 controlled tadalafil clinical trials, the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events was low and comparable in tadalafil- and placebo-treated patients."( Update on clinical trials of tadalafil demonstrates no increased risk of cardiovascular adverse events.
Costigan, TM; Emmick, JT; Jackson, G; Kloner, RA; Warner, MR, 2004
)
0.95
"In tadalafil clinical trials, the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events in patients receiving tadalafil was low and comparable to placebo."( Update on clinical trials of tadalafil demonstrates no increased risk of cardiovascular adverse events.
Costigan, TM; Emmick, JT; Jackson, G; Kloner, RA; Warner, MR, 2004
)
1.24
" Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate."( Efficacy and safety of on-demand oral tadalafil in the treatment of men with erectile dysfunction in Taiwan: a randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled clinical study.
Chen, KK; Costigan, TM; Emmick, JT; Huang, ST; Jiann, BP; Ju-Ton, H; Lee, SS; Lin, JS; Su, CK; Wang, CJ, 2004
)
0.59
" The most common treatment-emergent adverse events reported by patients in all eight groups were headache, nasal congestion, dyspepsia, flushing, and back pain."( Efficacy and safety of tadalafil across ethnic groups and various risk factors in men with erectile dysfunction: Use of a novel noninferiority study design.
Ahuja, S; Barada, J; Donatucci, C; Garcia, CS; Morgentaler, A; Natanegara, F; Niederberger, C; Wong, DG, 2006
)
0.64
" Tadalafil was well tolerated, with dyspepsia and headache as the most frequent adverse events reported."( Efficacy and safety of two dosing regimens of tadalafil and patterns of sexual activity in men with diabetes mellitus and erectile dysfunction: Scheduled use vs. on-demand regimen evaluation (SURE) study in 14 European countries.
Buvat, J; Chan, M; Kuepfer, C; Schmitt, H; van Ahlen, H; Varanese, L, 2006
)
1.5
"Tadalafil, when taken on demand or three times per week, is efficacious and safe in men with diabetes and ED."( Efficacy and safety of two dosing regimens of tadalafil and patterns of sexual activity in men with diabetes mellitus and erectile dysfunction: Scheduled use vs. on-demand regimen evaluation (SURE) study in 14 European countries.
Buvat, J; Chan, M; Kuepfer, C; Schmitt, H; van Ahlen, H; Varanese, L, 2006
)
2.03
" All adverse events (11 cases of headache and dizziness, 8 cases of digestive canal unwell, 5 cases of flushing, 2 cases of back muscle pain) associated with tadalafil were mild and recovered without any treatment."( [Observation of safety and efficacy of tadalafil for men with erectile dysfunction].
Fang, JJ; Li, FY; Zhu, XW, 2006
)
0.8
" Adverse reactions are generally transient and mild to moderate in nature."( [Observation of safety and efficacy of tadalafil for men with erectile dysfunction].
Fang, JJ; Li, FY; Zhu, XW, 2006
)
0.6
" This retrospective analysis evaluated serious cardiovascular treatment-emergent adverse events (CVTEAEs) reported in 36 clinical trials of tadalafil, a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor used for the treatment of erectile dysfunction."( Cardiovascular safety update of Tadalafil: retrospective analysis of data from placebo-controlled and open-label clinical trials of Tadalafil with as needed, three times-per-week or once-a-day dosing.
Chan, M; Costigan, TM; Hutter, AM; Jackson, G; Kloner, RA; Mittleman, MA; Vail, GM; Warner, MR, 2006
)
0.82
" Adverse events that occurred in at least 5% of patients were dyspepsia, headache, back pain, upper abdominal pain, and myalgia; nine patients (3."( Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of once-a-day dosing of tadalafil 5mg and 10mg in the treatment of erectile dysfunction: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Casabé, AR; Elion-Mboussa, A; Giuliano, F; Glina, S; Porst, H; Ralph, D; Shen, W; Whitaker, JS, 2006
)
0.57
" The most common adverse events reported by patients were headache, back pain, dyspepsia, and dizziness."( Efficacy and safety of on-demand tadalafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction in South-East Asian men.
Chan, M; Cheong, NF; Ding, Q; Guo, YL; Lim, E; Pan, TM; Shen, W; Venugopalan, M; Wang, YX; Zhu, JC, 2006
)
0.62
" Most (= or < 3%) treatment emergent adverse events were mild or moderate."( Efficacy and safety of on demand tadalafil in the treatment of East and Southeast Asian men with erectile dysfunction: a randomized double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled clinical study.
Chiang, HS; Kopernicky, V; Li, MK; Mendoza, JB; Tan, HM; Wang, WC; Yip, WC, 2006
)
0.62
" Most (98%) treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate in severity."( Efficacy and safety of tadalafil 5, 10, and 20 mg in Japanese men with erectile dysfunction: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Ishii, N; Kamidono, S; Kimoto, Y; Marumo, K; Nagao, K; Tsujimura, A; Vail, GM; Watts, S, 2006
)
0.64
" Treatment-emergent adverse events and vital signs were collected at each visit."( Efficacy and safety of tadalafil in men with erectile dysfunction following spinal cord injury.
Casariego, J; Cruz, N; Dahl, P; Del Popolo, G; Elion-Mboussa, A; Giuliano, F; Leriche, A; Löchner-Ernst, D; Lombardi, G; Reichert, S; Sanchez-Ramos, A, 2007
)
0.65
" The 2 most common treatment-emergent adverse events in the tadalafil group compared with placebo were headache (8."( Efficacy and safety of tadalafil in men with erectile dysfunction following spinal cord injury.
Casariego, J; Cruz, N; Dahl, P; Del Popolo, G; Elion-Mboussa, A; Giuliano, F; Leriche, A; Löchner-Ernst, D; Lombardi, G; Reichert, S; Sanchez-Ramos, A, 2007
)
0.89
" Adverse events (AEs) reported by all enrolled patients were collected."( Efficacy and safety of tadalafil in the treatment of Latin American men with erectile dysfunction: results of integrated analyses.
Casabé, A; Filimon, I; Glina, S; Kopernicky, V; Leñero, E; Quinzaños, L; Rubio-Aurioles, E; Torres, LO, 2008
)
0.66
"Safety measures included adverse events, electrocardiograms, and clinical laboratory measures."( Long-term safety and efficacy of tadalafil 5 mg dosed once daily in men with erectile dysfunction.
Casabé, A; Esler, A; Feldman, R; Klise, SR; Porst, H; Rajfer, J; Ralph, D; Vieiralves, LF; Wolka, AM, 2008
)
0.63
" No study drug-related serious adverse events were observed."( Long-term safety and efficacy of tadalafil 5 mg dosed once daily in men with erectile dysfunction.
Casabé, A; Esler, A; Feldman, R; Klise, SR; Porst, H; Rajfer, J; Ralph, D; Vieiralves, LF; Wolka, AM, 2008
)
0.63
" The most frequently reported adverse clinical events were in keeping with clinical trial data and include headache, dyspepsia and back pain."( The safety profile of tadalafil as prescribed in general practice in England: results from a prescription-event monitoring study involving 16 129 patients.
Cornelius, V; Hazell, L; Shakir, SA; Wilton, LV, 2009
)
0.67
" The profile of treatment-emergent adverse events with tadalafil once daily was similar to that previously reported with as-needed treatment; the most common adverse events with tadalafil (dyspepsia, nasopharyngitis, headaches) were reported in ( Efficacy and safety of tadalafil once daily: considerations for the practical application of a daily dosing option.
Donatucci, CF; Dowsett, SA; Giuliano, F; Glina, S; Sorsaburu, S; Watts, S; Wong, DG, 2008
)
0.9
"Tadalafil represents an effective and safe long-term option for SCI patients with ED."( Efficacy and safety of medium and long-term tadalafil use in spinal cord patients with erectile dysfunction.
Cecconi, F; Del Popolo, G; Lombardi, G; Macchiarella, A, 2009
)
2.06
"To identify the patient demographic factors, comorbidities, and concomitant medications associated with a change in the likelihood of tadalafil-associated adverse events (AEs) in men with erectile dysfunction."( Likelihood of tadalafil-associated adverse events in integrated multiclinical trial database: classification tree analysis in men with erectile dysfunction.
Brock, G; Glina, S; Kopernicky, V; Moncada, I; Watts, S; Wolka, A; Xu, L, 2009
)
0.92
" In addition to its outstanding efficacy that lasts 36 hours, tadalafil shows an excellent safety and tolerance, with only a few transient mild to moderate adverse events."( [Tadalafil for erectile dysfunction: excellent safety and tolerance].
Bai, WJ, 2009
)
1.5
" Headache and back pain were the most frequently reported adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of tadalafil taken as needed for the treatment of erectile dysfunction in Asian men: results of an integrated analysis.
Chiang, HS; Choi, HK; Guo, YL; Kopernicky, V; Shen, W; Viswanathan, VP; Yip, AW, 2009
)
0.66
"Consistent with pharmacokinetic predictions, data from clinical trials indicate that once-daily use of low-dose tadalafil is a safe and effective treatment for men with ED."( Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic overview of low-dose daily administration of tadalafil.
McGill, J; Sorsaburu, S; Strawbridge, A; Wong, D; Wrishko, R, 2009
)
0.79
" The main treatment-emergent adverse events, chiefly induced by the interactions of tadalafil with PDE5 and isoforms, are mild or moderate in severity, transient and reversible, which may disappear without drug withdrawal."( [Safety and tolerance of tadalafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction].
He, XY, 2009
)
0.88
"Tadalafil is an effective and safe treatment for males with MS suffering from ED."( Efficacy and safety of tadalafil for erectile dysfunction in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Del Popolo, G; Lombardi, G; Macchiarella, A, 2010
)
2.11
" The most common adverse events (AEs) in tadalafil-treated subjects were back pain, nasopharyngitis, dyspepsia, headache, and myalgia."( A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study to assess the efficacy and safety of once-a-day tadalafil in men with erectile dysfunction who are naïve to PDE5 inhibitors.
Aversa, A; Barker, C; Moncada, I; Montorsi, F; Perimenis, P; Porst, H; Shane, MA; Sorsaburu, S, 2011
)
0.85
" No serious adverse events were observed, except some common ones, such as rubeosis (11."( [Efficacy and safety of long-term small-dose tadalafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction].
Ji, JT; Liu, ZY; Lu, X; Piao, SG; Sheng, X; Xu, CL; Xu, WD; Ye, HM, 2011
)
0.63
" Categoric efficacy variables were analyzed with the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, and between-group differences in treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed using the Fisher exact test."( Efficacy and safety of tadalafil once daily in the treatment of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of an international randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Casabé, AR; Kim, ED; Mirone, V; Porst, H; Secrest, RJ; Sundin, DP; Viktrup, L; Xu, L, 2011
)
0.68
" The adverse event profile was consistent with that previously reported in men with ED."( Efficacy and safety of tadalafil once daily in the treatment of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of an international randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Casabé, AR; Kim, ED; Mirone, V; Porst, H; Secrest, RJ; Sundin, DP; Viktrup, L; Xu, L, 2011
)
0.68
" Phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors (PDE5-i) are generally regarded as safe and effective."( 10-Year analysis of adverse event reports to the Food and Drug Administration for phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors.
Costabile, RA; Lowe, G, 2012
)
0.38
"Summarized reports of adverse events (AEs) for each PDE5-i were requested from the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research within the FDA."( 10-Year analysis of adverse event reports to the Food and Drug Administration for phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors.
Costabile, RA; Lowe, G, 2012
)
0.38
" 10-year analysis of adverse event reports to the Food and Drug Administration for phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors."( 10-Year analysis of adverse event reports to the Food and Drug Administration for phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors.
Costabile, RA; Lowe, G, 2012
)
0.38
"A low incidence of some PDE-related adverse events may be reflected by the high selectivity of avanafil against non-PDE5 isozymes."( Selectivity of avanafil, a PDE5 inhibitor for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: implications for clinical safety and improved tolerability.
Burnett, AL; Day, WW; DiDonato, K; Heller, WH; Kikkawa, K; Kotera, J; Omori, K; Peterson, CA; Wang, R; Yee, S, 2012
)
0.38
" Lower selectivity against PDE1, PDE6, and PDE11 is consistent with results from randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials in which musculoskeletal and hemodynamic adverse events were reported in <2% of patients and no color vision-related abnormalities were reported with avanafil doses up to 200 mg once daily."( Selectivity of avanafil, a PDE5 inhibitor for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: implications for clinical safety and improved tolerability.
Burnett, AL; Day, WW; DiDonato, K; Heller, WH; Kikkawa, K; Kotera, J; Omori, K; Peterson, CA; Wang, R; Yee, S, 2012
)
0.38
"Data suggest that avanafil may confer a safety benefit, in terms of a lower incidence of specific adverse events, by virtue of its high specificity to PDE5 and its overall selectivity against other PDE isozymes."( Selectivity of avanafil, a PDE5 inhibitor for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: implications for clinical safety and improved tolerability.
Burnett, AL; Day, WW; DiDonato, K; Heller, WH; Kikkawa, K; Kotera, J; Omori, K; Peterson, CA; Wang, R; Yee, S, 2012
)
0.38
" Both doses of tadalafil were generally well tolerated, with adverse event rates similar to placebo."( Efficacy and safety of once-daily tadalafil in men with erectile dysfunction who reported no successful intercourse attempts at baseline.
Burns, PR; Kim, ED; Ni, X; Seftel, AD; Shabsigh, R, 2013
)
1.02
" PDE5-Is are generally safe and well tolerated, and there is no major difference on the safety profile."( Comparative effectiveness and safety of oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Chen, Q; Ding, H; Lee, J; Liu, Y; Mao, C; Qin, X; Ren, Z; Tang, J; Tian, J; Yang, Z; Yuan, J; Zhang, R, 2013
)
0.39
" Patient-reported adverse events included headache (4%) and heartburn (2%)."( Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of overnight switching from sildenafil to tadalafil in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Doran, AK; Hill, W; Shapiro, S; Traiger, G; Zhang, L, 2013
)
0.62
" Changes in total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS-quality of life index, and BPH impact index were examined overall, and changes in IPSS or adverse events (AEs) were examined across subgroups of interest."( Efficacy and safety of tadalafil 5 mg once daily for lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia: subgroup analyses of pooled data from 4 multinational, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical studies.
Cox, D; Dey, D; Goldfischer, ER; Oelke, M; Porst, H; Viktrup, L; Watts, S, 2013
)
0.7
" Changes in lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia were assessed with the I-PSS, erectile dysfunction improvements were assessed with the IIEF-EF (International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function) in sexually active men and safety was assessed by evaluating adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of the coadministration of tadalafil once daily with finasteride for 6 months in men with lower urinary tract symptoms and prostatic enlargement secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Casabé, A; Da Pozzo, LF; Henderson, RJ; Henneges, C; Roehrborn, CG; Sorsaburu, S; Viktrup, L; Wong, DG; Zepeda, S, 2014
)
0.66
" Tadalafil/finasteride coadministration was well tolerated and most adverse events were mild/moderate."( Efficacy and safety of the coadministration of tadalafil once daily with finasteride for 6 months in men with lower urinary tract symptoms and prostatic enlargement secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Casabé, A; Da Pozzo, LF; Henderson, RJ; Henneges, C; Roehrborn, CG; Sorsaburu, S; Viktrup, L; Wong, DG; Zepeda, S, 2014
)
1.57
" Safety assessment included laboratory tests and patient's reporting of adverse event."( A comparative randomized prospective study to evaluate efficacy and safety of combination of tamsulosin and tadalafil vs. tamsulosin or tadalafil alone in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Mandal, AK; Mete, UK; Singh, DV; Singh, SK, 2014
)
0.62
" Tadalafil may be a safe drug to treat children and young adults with PAH."( Comparison of the therapeutic and side effects of tadalafil and sildenafil in children and adolescents with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Beheshtian, E; Sabri, MR, 2014
)
1.57
" The safety was assessed by observing drug tolerability and adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of long-term tadalafil 5 mg once daily combined with sildenafil 50 mg as needed at the early stage of treatment for patients with erectile dysfunction.
Cui, H; Deng, Y; Fang, J; Liu, B; Song, Z; Wang, H; Wang, Z; Zhang, S, 2015
)
0.7
"L-carnitine combined with tadalafil is safe and effective for the treatment of LOH with ED."( [Safety and efficacy of L-carnitine and tadalafil for late-onset hypogonadism with ED: a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial].
Cai, ZK; Dai, JC; Li, P; Li, Z; Wang, YX; Wang, Z; Zhang, W; Zheng, JH, 2014
)
0.97
"The present studies examined the toxic interaction between the non-coxib celecoxib derivative OSU-03012 and phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitors, and also determined the roles of endoplasmic reticulum stress response regulators in cell survival."( Regulation of OSU-03012 toxicity by ER stress proteins and ER stress-inducing drugs.
Booth, L; Cruickshanks, N; Dent, P; Grant, S; Poklepovic, A; Roberts, JL, 2014
)
0.4
" It has not yet been observed if transition from sildenafil to tadalafil is beneficial in patients suffering from adverse reactions."( Safety and long-term efficacy of transition from sildenafil to tadalafil due to side effects in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Egenlauf, B; Ehlken, N; Grünig, E; Harzheim, D; Lichtblau, M; Marra, A; Pinado, FP, 2015
)
0.9
"A retrospective analysis of PAH-patients who were stable on sildenafil for >3 months and transitioned to tadalafil due to adverse events was performed."( Safety and long-term efficacy of transition from sildenafil to tadalafil due to side effects in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Egenlauf, B; Ehlken, N; Grünig, E; Harzheim, D; Lichtblau, M; Marra, A; Pinado, FP, 2015
)
0.87
"5 %) adverse events occurred under tadalafil as well and therapy with PDE-5 inhibitors was discontinued."( Safety and long-term efficacy of transition from sildenafil to tadalafil due to side effects in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Egenlauf, B; Ehlken, N; Grünig, E; Harzheim, D; Lichtblau, M; Marra, A; Pinado, FP, 2015
)
0.93
" Specific adverse events with PDE5 inhibitors included headache (12."( Efficacy and safety of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors in treating erectile dysfunction after bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.
Cui, Y; Gao, Z; Liu, X; Shi, L, 2016
)
0.43
" These products represent a major safety threat for the consumers in Egypt and the Middle East, especially; the target audience is mostly affected with heart and blood pressure problems seeking natural and safe alternatives to the well-established Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors (PDE-5Is)."( Male enhancement Nutraceuticals in the Middle East market: Claim, pharmaceutical quality and safety assessments.
ElAgouri, G; ElAmrawy, F; ElYazbi, A; Eshra, A; Nounou, MI, 2015
)
0.42
" Safety measurements included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), adverse events (AEs) leading to discontinuation, serious AEs (SAEs), and cardiovascular AEs."( Efficacy and safety of tadalafil 5 mg once daily in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia in men aged ≥75 years: integrated analyses of pooled data from multinational, randomized, placebo-controlled cli
Büttner, H; Oelke, M; Takita, Y; Viktrup, L; Wagg, A, 2017
)
0.77
"Meta-analyses are frequently performed on adverse event data and are primarily used for improving statistical power to detect safety signals."( A Bayesian meta-analytic approach for safety signal detection in randomized clinical trials.
Fukimbara, S; Odani, M; Sato, T, 2017
)
0.46
" We applied the proposed Bayesian meta-analysis models to published adverse event data from three premarketing randomized clinical trials of tadalafil and to a simulation study motivated by the case example to evaluate the characteristics of three alternative models."( A Bayesian meta-analytic approach for safety signal detection in randomized clinical trials.
Fukimbara, S; Odani, M; Sato, T, 2017
)
0.66
"Comparison of the results from the Bayesian meta-analysis model with those from Fisher's exact test after simple pooling showed that 6 out of 10 adverse events were the same within a top 10 ranking of individual adverse events with regard to association with treatment."( A Bayesian meta-analytic approach for safety signal detection in randomized clinical trials.
Fukimbara, S; Odani, M; Sato, T, 2017
)
0.46
"Adverse events under the same body system were not necessarily positively related when we used "system organ class" and "preferred term" in the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities as a hierarchical structure of adverse events."( A Bayesian meta-analytic approach for safety signal detection in randomized clinical trials.
Fukimbara, S; Odani, M; Sato, T, 2017
)
0.46
"Our proposed meta-analysis models considered trial effects to avoid confounding by trial and borrowed strength from both within and across body systems to obtain reasonable and stable estimates of an effect measure by considering a hierarchical structure of adverse events."( A Bayesian meta-analytic approach for safety signal detection in randomized clinical trials.
Fukimbara, S; Odani, M; Sato, T, 2017
)
0.46
" Safety was assessed by analyzing the frequency of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs), and serious adverse drug reactions (SADRs)."( Safety and effectiveness of tadalafil in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: Japanese post-marketing surveillance data.
Kobayashi, N; Murakami, M; Tajima, K; Taketsuna, M; Yamazaki, H, 2017
)
0.75
" The meta-analyses of adverse events showed no significant differences."( Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil Once-a-Day versus Tadalafil On-Demand in Patients with Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.
Dong, Q; Liu, L; Peng, Z; Wei, Q; Yang, B; Yang, L, 2017
)
0.77
" Safety was assessed from the frequency of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs), and serious adverse drug reactions (SADRs)."( Safety and effectiveness of tadalafil in pediatric patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: a sub-group analysis based on Japan post-marketing surveillance.
Kobayashi, N; Murakami, M; Suzuki, N; Tajima, K; Taketsuna, M; Yamazaki, H, 2017
)
0.75
"Three cases were initially commenced on 10 mg/day and monitored for major adverse events."( Safety and dose-finding trial of tadalafil administered for fetal growth restriction: A phase-1 clinical study.
Ikeda, T; Kamimoto, Y; Kondo, E; Kubo, M; Maki, S; Murabayashi, N; Nii, M; Osato, K; Tanaka, H; Umekawa, T, 2017
)
0.74
" Maternal adverse events in all doses were recorded as least one grade 1 adverse events, as tadalafil was considered acceptable from the viewpoint of the mothers."( Safety and dose-finding trial of tadalafil administered for fetal growth restriction: A phase-1 clinical study.
Ikeda, T; Kamimoto, Y; Kondo, E; Kubo, M; Maki, S; Murabayashi, N; Nii, M; Osato, K; Tanaka, H; Umekawa, T, 2017
)
0.96
" The safety assessments were adverse reactions, laboratory test results, and vital signs at week 24."( Efficacy and Safety of a Fixed-Dose Combination Therapy of Tamsulosin and Tadalafil for Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Erectile Dysfunction: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blinded, Active-Controlled Trial.
Ahn, TY; Hyun, JS; Jung, J; Kim, SW; Lee, SW; Min, KS; Moon, DG; Moon, KH; Park, JK; Park, K; Park, NC; Ryu, JK; Son, H; Yang, DY; Yang, SK, 2017
)
0.69
" No clinically significant adverse events regarding the investigational products were observed during the 24-week period."( Efficacy and Safety of a Fixed-Dose Combination Therapy of Tamsulosin and Tadalafil for Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Erectile Dysfunction: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blinded, Active-Controlled Trial.
Ahn, TY; Hyun, JS; Jung, J; Kim, SW; Lee, SW; Min, KS; Moon, DG; Moon, KH; Park, JK; Park, K; Park, NC; Ryu, JK; Son, H; Yang, DY; Yang, SK, 2017
)
0.69
" The primary endpoint of the study was safety at 12 months as assessed by the proportion of patients experiencing at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (serious or nonserious)."( Evaluation of the long-term safety and effectiveness of tadalafil once daily in Chinese men with erectile dysfunction: interim results of a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial.
Dai, YT; Jiang, H; Li, FB; Lin, HC; Liu, JH; Lou, Y; Luo, JD; Yan, S; Zhang, ZC; Zhao, LM; Zhu, ZH,
)
0.38
" The following outcome measures were obtained at baseline and at 4 and 8 weeks of tadalafil treatment: physical examination, adverse effects, Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12) score, International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) score, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and free radical testing."( Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of a daily dose of 5 mg of tadalafil, over an 8-week period, for improving quality of life among Korean men with andropause symptoms, including erectile dysfunction: A pilot study.
Han, CH; Kim, BD; Lee, JG; Lee, KK; Yum, KS, 2018
)
0.94
" No adverse effects were noted."( Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of a daily dose of 5 mg of tadalafil, over an 8-week period, for improving quality of life among Korean men with andropause symptoms, including erectile dysfunction: A pilot study.
Han, CH; Kim, BD; Lee, JG; Lee, KK; Yum, KS, 2018
)
0.71
"Tadalafil (5 mg dose, once daily) is a safe and effective treatment to improve ED, and overall QoL, among Korean men with andropause symptoms, including ED."( Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of a daily dose of 5 mg of tadalafil, over an 8-week period, for improving quality of life among Korean men with andropause symptoms, including erectile dysfunction: A pilot study.
Han, CH; Kim, BD; Lee, JG; Lee, KK; Yum, KS, 2018
)
2.16
" We concluded that tadalafil is well tolerated and safe in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities and, in addition, has a beneficial effect on the cardiovascular system."( [Safety of tadalafil in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities].
Bulygin, KV; Galimov, SN; Galimova, EF; Gaysina, GG; Nikitina, IL; Pavlov, VN, 2019
)
1.23
" However, the least side effect was observed in the tadalafil + aspirin group."( Efficacy and safety of combination of tadalafil and aspirin versus tadalafil or aspirin alone in patients with vascular erectile dysfunction: a comparative randomized prospective study.
Albayrak, S; Bayraktar, Z, 2019
)
1.04
" For safety, combination-therapy had a higher incidence rate of any adverse events (AEs) and discontinuation due to AEs than monotherapy with the exception of pain."( Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil Plus Tamsulosin Compared with Tadalafil Alone in Treating Men with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Erectile Dysfunction.
Cui, Y; Gao, Z; Wu, J; Xu, Z; Zheng, X; Zhou, Z,
)
0.4
" Then we recorded the IIEF-5 score and penile erection hardness score (EHS) and adverse reactions and compared them among the three groups of patients."( [Efficacy and safety of regular use of sildenafil in the treatment of penile erectile dysfunction].
Jia, DH; Li, R; Wang, CL; Wang, R; Yang, F; Zhang, TB; Zhang, WX; Zheng, T, 2019
)
0.51
"Regular use of sildenafil has a therapeutic effect similar to that of tadalafil but better than that of sildenafil on-demand, without more adverse effects."( [Efficacy and safety of regular use of sildenafil in the treatment of penile erectile dysfunction].
Jia, DH; Li, R; Wang, CL; Wang, R; Yang, F; Zhang, TB; Zhang, WX; Zheng, T, 2019
)
0.75
" (Conclusion) Tadalafil is considered to be a highly effective and safe drug in very elderly patients with LUTS."( [EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF TADALAFIL IN VERY ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS].
Fukagai, T; Hayashi, K; Hirayama, K; Igarashi, A; Ishikawa, K; Koshikiya, A; Morita, M; Noguchi, T; Ogawa, Y; Sasaki, H, 2019
)
1.17
"The adverse effects were minor and were managed symptomatically without any drug discontinuity."( Efficacy and safety of tadalafil vs tamsulosin in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) as a result of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH)-open label randomised controlled study.
Gupta, S; Singh, I; Tk, A, 2020
)
0.87
"Male reproductive toxicity is a well-known adverse effect of cisplatin (CIS), an important antineoplastic agent used to control several types of cancers."( Tadalafil alleviates cisplatin-induced reproductive toxicity through the activation of the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway and the inhibition of oxidative stress and apoptosis in male rats.
Abdel-Wahab, BA; Alkahtani, SA; Elagab, EAM, 2020
)
2
" An analysis of safety outcomes revealed extremely high adverse events (AEs) and pain in the combination group."( Efficacy and Safety of Combination Comprising Tamsulosin and PDE5-Is, Relative to Monotherapies, in Treating Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Erectile Dysfunction Associated With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Meta-Analysis.
Sun, F; Sun, K; Wang, J; Wang, T; Wu, G; Wu, J; Yao, H; Zhang, D,
)
0.13
"To study the efficacy of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor tadalafil in attenuating adverse events after low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer."( Impact of low-dose tadalafil on adverse events after low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer: A bi-center randomized open-label trial.
Fukazawa, A; Hashida, I; Iijima, K; Ishizuka, O; Kato, H; Koiwai, K; Minagawa, T; Ogawa, T; Oguchi, T; Saitou, T, 2021
)
1.2
"To describe the otorhinolaryngological adverse effects of the main drugs used in urological practice."( Otorhinolaryngological adverse effects of urological drugs.
Ganança, FF; Lopes, KC; Maia, NPD,
)
0.13
"A review of the scientific literature was performed using a combination of specific descriptors (side effect, adverse effect, scopolamine, sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil, oxybutynin, tolterodine, spironolactone, furosemide, hydrochlorothiazide, doxazosin, alfuzosin, terazosin, prazosin, tamsulosin, desmopressin) contained in publications until April 2020."( Otorhinolaryngological adverse effects of urological drugs.
Ganança, FF; Lopes, KC; Maia, NPD,
)
0.33
"The main drugs used in Urology may cause several otorhinolaryngological adverse effects."( Otorhinolaryngological adverse effects of urological drugs.
Ganança, FF; Lopes, KC; Maia, NPD,
)
0.13
"Most of the drugs used in urological practice have otorhinolaryngological adverse effects."( Otorhinolaryngological adverse effects of urological drugs.
Ganança, FF; Lopes, KC; Maia, NPD,
)
0.13
" Demographics, symptoms, and adverse effects were collected."( Safety and tolerability of combination therapy with ambrisentan and tadalafil for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension in children: Real-world experience.
Crook, S; Dorn, ML; Frank, B; Hite, MD; Issapour, A; Ivy, DD; Krishnan, US; Rosenzweig, EB, 2022
)
0.96
"This pooled safety analysis assessed the incidence of hypotension-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with concomitant use of tadalafil and antihypertensive medications."( Analysis of integrated clinical safety data of tadalafil in patients receiving concomitant antihypertensive medications.
Gupta, A; Kloner, RA; Kostis, JB; McGraw, TP; Qiu, C, 2022
)
1.17
"RCTs reporting obstetric or perinatal outcomes or maternal adverse outcomes in women taking PDE5i in pregnancy."( Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors in pregnancy: Systematic review and meta-analysis of maternal and perinatal safety and clinical outcomes.
Deprest, J; Kumar, S; Mol, BW; Russo, F; Turner, JM, 2022
)
0.72
" Adverse events occurred in two cases."( Efficacy and safety of dutasteride with tadalafil add-on therapy in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Fujimoto, K; Gotoh, D; Hori, S; Miyake, M; Morizawa, Y; Nakai, Y; Torimoto, K, 2022
)
0.99

Pharmacokinetics

Tadalafil was absorbed rapidly with mean Cmax (378 microg l-1 for 20 mg) observed at 2 h. concentrations declined nearly monoexponentially with a mean (5th, 95th percentiles) t1/2 of 17.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The method is suitable in pharmacokinetic investigation and monitoring tadalafil concentration."( Determination of tadalafil in small volumes of plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection.
Cheng, CL; Chou, CH, 2005
)
0.9
" This review comparatively discusses the major characteristics of the pharmacokinetic profile of all 3 PDE5 inhibitors, including bioavailability and rate of absorption, Biopharmaceutical Classification System categorization, elimination mechanisms, and metabolic profile including active metabolites, as well as the drug-drug interaction potential and modification of pharmacokinetic properties under selected physiologic and pathophysiologic conditions."( The clinical pharmacokinetics of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction.
Gupta, M; Kovar, A; Meibohm, B, 2005
)
0.33
"Potential pharmacokinetic interactions between dapoxetine, a serotonin transporter inhibitor developed for the treatment of premature ejaculation (PE), and the phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors tadalafil and sildenafil, agents used in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED), were investigated in an open-label, randomized, crossover study (n=24 men) comparing dapoxetine 60 mg, dapoxetine 60 mg+tadalafil 20 mg, and dapoxetine 60 mg+sildenafil 100 mg."( Dapoxetine, a novel treatment for premature ejaculation, does not have pharmacokinetic interactions with phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors.
Desai, D; Dresser, MJ; Gidwani, S; Modi, NB; Seftel, AD,
)
0.32
"Tadalafil was absorbed rapidly with mean Cmax (378 microg l-1 for 20 mg) observed at 2 h; thereafter, concentrations declined nearly monoexponentially with a mean (5th, 95th percentiles) t1/2 of 17."( Tadalafil pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects.
Bedding, AW; Forgue, ST; Mitchell, MI; Patterson, BE; Payne, CD; Phillips, DL; Wrishko, RE, 2006
)
3.22
" Tadalafil is mainly metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, and as bosentan induces CYP2C9 and CYP3A4, a pharmacokinetic interaction is possible between these agents."( Pharmacokinetic interaction between tadalafil and bosentan in healthy male subjects.
Darstein, C; Dingemanse, J; Mitchell, MI; Phillips, DL; Wrishko, RE; Yu, A, 2008
)
1.53
"Based upon pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic data, once-daily doses of tadalafil 5 mg were predicted to provide therapeutic concentrations that would be maintained throughout the 24-hour dosing interval."( Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic overview of low-dose daily administration of tadalafil.
McGill, J; Sorsaburu, S; Strawbridge, A; Wong, D; Wrishko, R, 2009
)
0.81
"Consistent with pharmacokinetic predictions, data from clinical trials indicate that once-daily use of low-dose tadalafil is a safe and effective treatment for men with ED."( Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic overview of low-dose daily administration of tadalafil.
McGill, J; Sorsaburu, S; Strawbridge, A; Wong, D; Wrishko, R, 2009
)
0.79
" Due to the potential combination use, the pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions between these two drugs were assessed in a crossover study in 26 healthy adults."( No clinically relevant pharmacokinetic and safety interactions of ambrisentan in combination with tadalafil in healthy volunteers.
Boinpally, R; Dufton, C; Harrison, B; Mandagere, A; Spence, R, 2009
)
0.57
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined in a noncompartmental analysis."( Effect of tipranavir/ritonavir combination on the pharmacokinetics of tadalafil in healthy volunteers.
Dellamonica, P; Durant, J; Ferrando, S; Garraffo, R; Lavrut, T; MacGregor, TR; Rouyrre, N; Sabo, JP, 2011
)
0.6
" These findings have potential therapeutic implications for predicting the pharmacokinetic responses of humans to hyperlipidemia."( Effects of experimental hyperlipidemia on the pharmacokinetics of tadalafil in rats.
Lee, JH; Lee, YJ; Oh, JH, 2012
)
0.62
"For both drugs, the peak plasma concentration was lower and the half-life was shorter than the known values in adults."( Pharmacokinetics of drugs for pediatric pulmonary hypertension.
Azuma, H; Kajihama, A; Kajino, H; Kamiyama, N; Maeda, J; Nakau, K; Oka, H; Sugimoto, M; Tasaki, Y; Yamagishi, H, 2016
)
0.43
" Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of the ODF to FCT formulations and their 90% CIs for the pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated."( Comparison of tadalafil pharmacokinetics after administration of a new orodispersible film versus a film-coated tablet.
Chang, S; Heo, SH; Hong, JH; Jin, EH; Kim, G; Kim, J; Kim, MG; Lee, S; Park, SI; Song, KH, 2018
)
0.84
" Among them, compound 15 (TPN171) with subnanomolar potency for PDE5 and good selectivity over PDE6 was finally recognized as a potential drug candidate, and its pharmacokinetic profiles in rats and dogs are significantly improved compared to the starting compound (3)."( Pharmacokinetics-Driven Optimization of 4(3 H)-Pyrimidinones as Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors Leading to TPN171, a Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
Aisa, HA; Gong, X; He, Y; Jiang, H; Jiang, X; Li, J; Liu, Z; Shen, J; Shi, J; Suo, J; Tian, G; Wang, Y; Wang, Z; Wu, C; Wu, J; Xu, Y; Xu, Z; Yang, R; Yang, X; Zhang, R; Zhang, X; Zhu, W; Zou, X, 2019
)
0.51
" Pharmacodynamic study was performed via biochemical analysis of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) in rat penis 2-h post-treatment and compared with oral suspension of Cialis® tablets."( Intranasal Tadalafil nanoemulsions: formulation, characterization and pharmacodynamic evaluation.
Abdelmonsif, DA; Boraie, N; Elbardisy, B; Galal, S, 2019
)
0.9
" To investigate and potentially fulfill an unmet need in pediatric patients with PAH, pharmacokinetic (PK) data were explored in a pediatric phase Ib/II study and pooled with prior phase III (pulmonary arterial hypertension and response to tadalafil [PHIRST-1]) adult data to develop the first population PK model for tadalafil in pediatric patients with PAH."( Population Pharmacokinetics of Tadalafil in Pediatric Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Combined Adult/Pediatric Model.
Ferguson-Sells, L; Li, B; Small, D; Velez de Mendizabal, N, 2022
)
1.19
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental analysis."( Pharmacokinetic and Bioequivalence Evaluation of 2 Tadalafil Tablets in Healthy Male Chinese Subjects Under Fasting and Fed Conditions.
Chen, JL; Hu, Y; Jiang, B; Lou, HG; Ruan, ZR; Shao, R; Yang, DD, 2022
)
0.97
" This study aimed to examine the pharmacokinetic drug interaction between tadalafil and amlodipine and the tolerability of their combined administration in healthy male subjects."( Pharmacokinetic Drug Interaction Between Amlodipine and Tadalafil: An Open-Label, Randomized, Multiple-Dose Crossover Study in Healthy Male Volunteers.
Hong, S; Jung, J; Kim, H; Lee, SH; Lim, HS, 2022
)
1.2
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental analysis."( Pharmacokinetic Drug Interaction Between Amlodipine and Tadalafil: An Open-Label, Randomized, Multiple-Dose Crossover Study in Healthy Male Volunteers.
Hong, S; Jung, J; Kim, H; Lee, SH; Lim, HS, 2022
)
0.97
"A substantial pharmacokinetic drug interaction between tadalafil and amlodipine was observed with respect to the concentration of tadalafil when administered concomitantly."( Pharmacokinetic Drug Interaction Between Amlodipine and Tadalafil: An Open-Label, Randomized, Multiple-Dose Crossover Study in Healthy Male Volunteers.
Hong, S; Jung, J; Kim, H; Lee, SH; Lim, HS, 2022
)
1.21
" Tadalafil and canagliflozin were determined simultaneously in real human plasma using the described procedure and the method was applied for in vivo pharmacokinetic drug interaction study between the studied drugs, which proved significant interaction between them when administered simultaneously."( Cytochrome P450 3A4-mediated pharmacokinetic interaction study between tadalafil and canagliflozin using high-performance thin-layer chromatography.
Abdel-Aal, FAM; Ali, ABH; Mohamed, AI; Rageh, AH, 2022
)
1.86

Compound-Compound Interactions

Oral-appliance combined with tadalafil can improve erectile function in patients with severe OSAHS-induced ED, with a better efficacy than either of them used alone.Iloprost combined with low dose tadalfil regimen can effectively reduce PVR, increase 6MWD, and improve cardiopulmonary function in adults CHD patients with PAH.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of available prospective and cross-sectional studies on the use of PDE5-Is alone or in combination with α1-adrenergic blockers in patients with LUTS/benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)."( A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors alone or in combination with α-blockers for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Carini, M; Corona, G; Gacci, M; Kaplan, SA; Maggi, M; McVary, KT; Mirone, V; Roehrborn, CG; Salvi, M; Serni, S; Vignozzi, L, 2012
)
0.38
"To study the effect of Tadalafil combined with behavior therapy in helping obtain semen from infertile men in whom masturbation has failed."( [Tadalafil combined with behavior therapy for semen collection from infertile males in whom masturbation fails].
Gao, L; Hong, K; Jiang, H; Liu, DF; Ma, LL; Mao, JM; Qiao, J; Tang, WH; Yang, Y; Zhang, J; Zhao, LM, 2013
)
1.61
"Sixty male infertile patients from whom masturbation had failed to obtain semen were equally assigned to receive Tadalafil combined with behavior therapy (combination group) or Tadalafil only (control group)."( [Tadalafil combined with behavior therapy for semen collection from infertile males in whom masturbation fails].
Gao, L; Hong, K; Jiang, H; Liu, DF; Ma, LL; Mao, JM; Qiao, J; Tang, WH; Yang, Y; Zhang, J; Zhao, LM, 2013
)
1.51
"By training the patients and establishing a conditioned response to masturbation, Tadalafil combined with behavior therapy can significantly increase the success rate of semen collection from the male infertile patients in whom masturbation fails."( [Tadalafil combined with behavior therapy for semen collection from infertile males in whom masturbation fails].
Gao, L; Hong, K; Jiang, H; Liu, DF; Ma, LL; Mao, JM; Qiao, J; Tang, WH; Yang, Y; Zhang, J; Zhao, LM, 2013
)
1.53
"To observe the clinical effect of low-dose testosterone undecanoate capsules combined with tadalafil on late-onset hypogonadism (LOH) accompanied with ED."( [Low-dose testosterone undecanoate capsules combined with tadalafil for late-onset hypogonadism accompanied with ED].
Huang, CC; Li, GY; Liang, JH; Liang, SK; Meng, ZB; Shen, SL; Song, WR; Wei, GQ; Zhang, X; Zhu, CH, 2013
)
0.85
"Ninety cases of LOH accompanied with ED who met the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into a control group and a combination therapy group, the former treated with tadalafil and the latter with low-dose testosterone undecanoate capsules combined with tadalafil."( [Low-dose testosterone undecanoate capsules combined with tadalafil for late-onset hypogonadism accompanied with ED].
Huang, CC; Li, GY; Liang, JH; Liang, SK; Meng, ZB; Shen, SL; Song, WR; Wei, GQ; Zhang, X; Zhu, CH, 2013
)
0.83
"Low-dose testosterone undecanoate capsules combined with tadalafil has a definite clinical effect and no obvious adverse reactions in the treatment of LOH accompanied with ED."( [Low-dose testosterone undecanoate capsules combined with tadalafil for late-onset hypogonadism accompanied with ED].
Huang, CC; Li, GY; Liang, JH; Liang, SK; Meng, ZB; Shen, SL; Song, WR; Wei, GQ; Zhang, X; Zhu, CH, 2013
)
0.88
"This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-term and low-dose tadalafil combined with sildenafil as needed at the early stage of treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED)."( Efficacy and safety of long-term tadalafil 5 mg once daily combined with sildenafil 50 mg as needed at the early stage of treatment for patients with erectile dysfunction.
Cui, H; Deng, Y; Fang, J; Liu, B; Song, Z; Wang, H; Wang, Z; Zhang, S, 2015
)
0.93
"To observe the clinical effect of low-dose once-daily tadalafil combined with Shuganyiyang Capsules in the treatment of mild-to-moderate erectile dysfunction (ED)."( [Low-dose tadalafil combined with Shuganyiyang capsules for mild-to-moderate erectile dysfunction].
Chen, G; Fu, J; Huang, XJ; Lü, BD; Yang, KB; Zhang, SG, 2014
)
1.05
"Low-dose once-daily tadalafil combined with Shuganyiyang Capsules is obviously effective in the treatment of mild-to-moderate ED, which not only improves the patients'erectile function, sexual self-confidence and sexual spontaneity, but also reduces their time concerns."( [Low-dose tadalafil combined with Shuganyiyang capsules for mild-to-moderate erectile dysfunction].
Chen, G; Fu, J; Huang, XJ; Lü, BD; Yang, KB; Zhang, SG, 2014
)
1.13
"To evaluate the therapy efficacy of iloprost combined with low dose tadalafil in adult congenital heart disease (CHD) patients with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)."( [Effects of iloprost combined with low dose tadalafil in adult congenital heart disease patients with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension: a single-center, open-label controlled study].
Chen, J; Huang, T; Huang, X; Huang, Y; Wu, S; Xia, C; Yao, H; Zhang, C; Zhang, G; Zhuang, J, 2014
)
0.9
"Adult CHD patients with severe PAH were included and divided into the sequential combination therapy group [iloprost: 10 µg/inhalation, 6 times per day for 6 months, and then add oral tadalafil (5 mg/d) till 12 months, n = 32] and upfront combination therapy group [iloprost: 10 µg/inhalation, 6 times per day combined with oral tadalafil (5 mg) for 12 months, n = 36]."( [Effects of iloprost combined with low dose tadalafil in adult congenital heart disease patients with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension: a single-center, open-label controlled study].
Chen, J; Huang, T; Huang, X; Huang, Y; Wu, S; Xia, C; Yao, H; Zhang, C; Zhang, G; Zhuang, J, 2014
)
0.85
"Iloprost combined with low dose tadalafil regimen can effectively reduce PVR, increase 6MWD, and improve cardiopulmonary function in adults CHD patients with severe PAH."( [Effects of iloprost combined with low dose tadalafil in adult congenital heart disease patients with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension: a single-center, open-label controlled study].
Chen, J; Huang, T; Huang, X; Huang, Y; Wu, S; Xia, C; Yao, H; Zhang, C; Zhang, G; Zhuang, J, 2014
)
0.95
"To investigate a possible relation between penile Doppler ultrasound examination (PDUE) parameters and efficacy of chronic therapy with tadalafil (TAD) combined with a protocol of aerobic physical activity (PA) in patients with late onset hypogonadism (LOH)."( Effects of tadalafil treatment combined with physical activity in patients with low onset hypogonadism: results from a not-randomized single arm phase 2 study.
Calogero, AE; Condorelli, RA; Di Mauro, M; La Vignera, S; Mongioì, LM; Morgia, G; Russo, GI, 2016
)
1.03
"To compare the effectiveness of the phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE-5i) tadalafil alone and in combination with a biologically active dietary supplement (BADS) NeyroDoz, containing the precursors of serotonin in patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) associated with secondary premature ejaculation (SPE)."( [New data on the effectiveness of Tadalafil alone and in combination with NeyroDoz in treating erectile dysfunction associated with secondary premature ejaculation].
Akhvlediani, ND; Matyukhov, IP, 2016
)
0.94
"To evaluate the effect of the oral-appliance combined with tadalafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) induced by severe obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS)."( [Oral-appliance combined with tadalafil for erectile dysfunction induced by severe obstructive sleep apneahypopnea syndrome].
Li, WB; Pan, MA; Zhang, T, 2016
)
0.97
"Oral-appliance combined with tadalafil can improve erectile function in patients with severe OSAHS-induced ED, with a better efficacy than either of them used alone."( [Oral-appliance combined with tadalafil for erectile dysfunction induced by severe obstructive sleep apneahypopnea syndrome].
Li, WB; Pan, MA; Zhang, T, 2016
)
1.01
" This article aims to provide the latest evidence for the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) combined with tadalafil in treatment of erectile dysfunction."( Chinese herbal medicine combined with tadalafil for erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Geng, LG; He, CB; Wang, YL; Yuan, SY, 2020
)
1.03
"All randomized controlled trials that Chinese herbal medicine combined with tadalafil for erectile dysfunction were included in databases of China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, Weip Database, China Biology Medicine disc (CBM), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library."( Chinese herbal medicine combined with tadalafil for erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Geng, LG; He, CB; Wang, YL; Yuan, SY, 2020
)
1.06
" Compared with tadalafil alone, meta-analysis suggests there were statistically significant differences in International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5), effective rate, Sexual Encounter Profile questions 2 and 3 (SEP-Q2, SEP-Q3) between traditional Chinese medicine combined with tadalafil, and no statistically significant differences in side effects between the two groups."( Chinese herbal medicine combined with tadalafil for erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Geng, LG; He, CB; Wang, YL; Yuan, SY, 2020
)
1.18
"Traditional Chinese medicine combined with tadalafil has significant efficacy in the treatment of ED with no increase in side effects."( Chinese herbal medicine combined with tadalafil for erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Geng, LG; He, CB; Wang, YL; Yuan, SY, 2020
)
1.09
"Aim of our systematic review is to evaluate and summarize the efficacy and safety of tadalafil alone or in combination with tamsulosin for the management of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)/benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and erectile dysfunction (ED)."( Tadalafil Alone or in Combination with Tamsulosin for the Management for LUTS/BPH and ED.
Chapple, C; Gacci, M; Gravas, S; Kaplan, S; McVary, KT; Morselli, S; Sebastianelli, A; Serni, S; Spatafora, P; Vignozzi, L, 2020
)
2.22
"To explore the clinical value of phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors (PDE-5i) combined with RigiScan-based audiovisual sexual stimulation (AVSS) test in comparison with that of nocturnal penile tumescence (NPT) test in evaluation of erectile function."( [PDE-5i combined with RigiScan-based audiovisual sexual stimulation test versus nocturnal penile tumescence test in evaluation of erectile function].
Ashok, R; Dai, YT; Gao, QQ; Song, T; Sun, GH; Sun, XL; Xu, ZP; Yu, W, 2020
)
0.56
"Compared with NPT test, PDE -5i combined with RigiScan-based AVSS test is simple, inexpensive, practical and with a high sensitivity and specificity, and therefore can be used as the first-choice strategy for etiological diagnosis of ED."( [PDE-5i combined with RigiScan-based audiovisual sexual stimulation test versus nocturnal penile tumescence test in evaluation of erectile function].
Ashok, R; Dai, YT; Gao, QQ; Song, T; Sun, GH; Sun, XL; Xu, ZP; Yu, W, 2020
)
0.56
" In this study, we validated a discriminant analysis using an ultra-compact, portable, and low-cost Raman scattering spectrometer combined with multivariate analysis."( Detection Method of Falsified Medicines by Using a Low-Cost Raman Scattering Spectrometer Combined with Soft Independent Modeling of Class Analogy and Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis.
Kimura, K; Sanada, T; Tsuboi, H; Yoshida, N, 2021
)
0.62
"To investigate the clinical effect of tadalafil combined with behavioral therapy and psychological counseling in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED)."( [Tadalafil combined with behavioral therapy and psychological counseling for erectile dysfunction].
Liu, X; Zhu, ZM, 2021
)
1.8
"We collected the clinical data on 338 cases of ED treated in our andrology clinic with tadalafil combined with behavioral therapy and psychological counseling (the trial group, n = 159) or with tadalafil alone (the control group, n = 179) from January to December 2019."( [Tadalafil combined with behavioral therapy and psychological counseling for erectile dysfunction].
Liu, X; Zhu, ZM, 2021
)
1.75
"Tadalafil combined with behavior therapy and psychological counseling is superior to oral tadalafil alone in the treatment of ED, which affords greater satisfaction with the therapeutic effect, higher quality of sexual life, and better relationship between the partners."( [Tadalafil combined with behavioral therapy and psychological counseling for erectile dysfunction].
Liu, X; Zhu, ZM, 2021
)
2.97
"To observe the clinical effect and safety of Shanhaidan Granules (SHDG) combined with tadalafil tablets (TT) in the treatment of ED."( [Effect of Shanhaidan Granules combined with tadalafil on erectile dysfunction: A multi-center clinical trial].
Chen, L; Chen, WJ; Cheng, HJ; Huang, YP; Li, L; Lu, MJ; Peng, Y; Wu, ZM; Yang, NQ, 2021
)
1.1
"Shanhaidan Granules combined with tadalafil can significantly improve the erectile function and reduce TCM syndromes in ED patients, and therefore can be applied effectively and safely in clinical practice."( [Effect of Shanhaidan Granules combined with tadalafil on erectile dysfunction: A multi-center clinical trial].
Chen, L; Chen, WJ; Cheng, HJ; Huang, YP; Li, L; Lu, MJ; Peng, Y; Wu, ZM; Yang, NQ, 2021
)
1.16
"We examined the discontinuation rates of tadalafil alone and in combination with a-blockers (ABs) for the treatment of male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), with or without erectile dysfunction (ED)."( Discontinuation Rates of Tadalafil Alone and in Combination with a-Blockers in the Treatment of Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms with or without Coexisting Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Chen, Q; Mao, Y; Tang, S; Zhou, H, 2022
)
1.29
"The discontinuation rate of tadalafil alone or in combination with ABs for LUTS with or without ED was relatively low and varied according to the study type."( Discontinuation Rates of Tadalafil Alone and in Combination with a-Blockers in the Treatment of Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms with or without Coexisting Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Chen, Q; Mao, Y; Tang, S; Zhou, H, 2022
)
1.32
"The study explored the clinical efficacy of a type 5 phosphodiesterase inhibitor (PDE5i) combined with Ziyin Baihuo granules in the treatment of patients suffering from erectile dysfunction (ED) with yin deficiency and fire-hyperactivity syndrome."( Analyzing the Clinical Efficacy of a Type 5 Phosphodiesterase Inhibitor Combined With Ziyin Baihuo Granules in the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction.
Lv, KL; Nan, YH; Sun, WG; Wang, R; Zhang, TB; Zhang, WX; Zheng, T,
)
0.13
"To investigate the clinical effect of dumai (governor meridian) moxibustion combined with low-dose tadalafil in the treatment of ED with decline of vital gate fire."( [Dumai moxibustion combined with low-dose tadalafil for erectile dysfunction: Evaluation of therapeutic effect].
DU, JG; Li, PC; Sun, ZX; Wei, XX; Zhang, XH; Zhang, ZG, 2023
)
1.39
"Dumai moxibustion combined with low-dose tadalafil can improve erectile function, increase penile blood flow velocity and alleviate clinical symptoms in ED patients with decline of vital gate fire, with definite clinical effect and safety."( [Dumai moxibustion combined with low-dose tadalafil for erectile dysfunction: Evaluation of therapeutic effect].
DU, JG; Li, PC; Sun, ZX; Wei, XX; Zhang, XH; Zhang, ZG, 2023
)
1.44

Bioavailability

This study aims at improving the bioavailability of a poorly soluble phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor; tadalafil (TD) via developing intranasal (IN) nanoemulsions (NEs)

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" It is as efficacious as sildenafil in in vitro and in vivo PDE5 inhibition models, and it is orally bioavailable in rats and dogs."( Substituted pyrazolopyridopyridazines as orally bioavailable potent and selective PDE5 inhibitors: potential agents for treatment of erectile dysfunction.
Adam, L; Beyer, B; Chong, S; Ferrer, P; He, B; Henwood, A; Humphrey, WG; Krupinski, J; Macor, JE; Mason, H; Normandin, D; Pongrac, R; Seliger, L; Wang, J; Wu, X; Yu, G; Zhang, R, 2003
)
0.32
" The validated method has been successfully used to analyze human plasma samples for application in pharmacokinetic, bioavailability or bioequivalence studies."( Quantitation of tadalafil in human plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with electrospray ionization.
Chidambara, J; Koteshwara, M; Manoj, S; Puran, S; Ramakrishna, NV; Santosh, M; Sumatha, B; Vishwottam, KN; Wishu, S, 2004
)
0.67
" Unfortunately, the low aqueous solubility and poor oral bioavailability rendered them undesirable development candidates."( Pyrroloquinolone PDE5 inhibitors with improved pharmaceutical profiles for clinical studies on erectile dysfunction.
Bhattacharjee, S; Guan, J; Haynes-Johnson, D; Jiang, W; John, TM; Kraft, P; Lundeen, S; Macielag, MJ; Qiu, Y; Sui, Z; Zhang, S, 2005
)
0.33
" This review comparatively discusses the major characteristics of the pharmacokinetic profile of all 3 PDE5 inhibitors, including bioavailability and rate of absorption, Biopharmaceutical Classification System categorization, elimination mechanisms, and metabolic profile including active metabolites, as well as the drug-drug interaction potential and modification of pharmacokinetic properties under selected physiologic and pathophysiologic conditions."( The clinical pharmacokinetics of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction.
Gupta, M; Kovar, A; Meibohm, B, 2005
)
0.33
" Food had negligible effects on bioavailability as assessed by 90% confidence intervals for Cmax and AUC mean ratios."( Tadalafil pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects.
Bedding, AW; Forgue, ST; Mitchell, MI; Patterson, BE; Payne, CD; Phillips, DL; Wrishko, RE, 2006
)
1.78
"High-altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE) is caused by exaggerated hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction associated with decreased bioavailability of nitric oxide in the lungs and by impaired reabsorption of alveolar fluid."( Both tadalafil and dexamethasone may reduce the incidence of high-altitude pulmonary edema: a randomized trial.
Bärtsch, P; Bernheim, A; Bloch, KE; Böhm, T; Brunner-La Rocca, HP; Dehnert, C; Fischler, M; Kiencke, S; Lehmann, T; Maggiorini, M; Mairbäurl, H; Naeije, R; Peth, S, 2006
)
0.85
" The absorption rate was rapid (1."( Tadalafil population pharmacokinetics in patients with erectile dysfunction.
Forgue, ST; Rapado, J; Staab, A; Tillmann, C; Trocóniz, IF, 2007
)
1.78
" There is increasing evidence suggesting that dysfunction of the vascular endothelium with reduced bioavailability of nitric oxide (NO) may be the pathogenetic link between ED and cardiovascular disease."( [Chronic PDE-5 inhibition in patients with erectile dysfunction: new treatment approach using once daily Tadalafil].
Büttner, H; Hell-Momeni, K; Porst, H, 2009
)
0.57
" Solid dispersion approach represents a promising carrier system for effective enhancement of dissolution and oral bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs."( In sight into tadalafil - block copolymer binary solid dispersion: Mechanistic investigation of dissolution enhancement.
Mehanna, MM; Motawaa, AM; Samaha, MW, 2010
)
0.72
"Insulin resistance impairs nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability and obesity promotes a state of chronic inflammation and damages the vascular endothelium."( Anti-inflammatory and cardioprotective effects of tadalafil in diabetic mice.
Das, A; Durrant, DE; Hoke, NN; Kukreja, RC; Salloum, FN; Varma, A, 2012
)
0.63
" Solid dispersion (SD) techniques are widely used to improve the bioavailability of drugs that are poorly water-soluble."( Design of PVP/VA S-630 based tadalafil solid dispersion to enhance the dissolution rate.
Choi, JS; Park, JS, 2017
)
0.75
"The purpose of this study is to improve the solubility, in vitro dissolution, and oral bioavailability in rats of tadalafil (TDF) by using SD technique with a weak acid and a copolymer."( Use of acidifier and solubilizer in tadalafil solid dispersion to enhance the in vitro dissolution and oral bioavailability in rats.
Byeon, JC; Choi, JS; Jang, WS; Jeong, HM; Kwon, SH; Lee, SE; Park, JS, 2017
)
0.94
" Importantly, the bioavailability of this poorly water-soluble drug could be substantially increased with the proposed formulations, and the in vitro and in vivo release rates could be effectively adjusted by choosing the appropriate type of carrier material: Whereas mannitol-based ground hot-melt extrudates rapidly released the drug and led to an early rise in drug plasma concentrations, Soluplus-based systems released tadalafil more slowly, resulting in delayed plasma peaks."( In vitro and in vivo behavior of ground tadalafil hot-melt extrudates: How the carrier material can effectively assure rapid or controlled drug release.
Cantin, O; Jachowicz, R; Krupa, A; Siepmann, J; Strach, B; Tabor, Z; Wróbel, A; Wyska, E, 2017
)
0.89
"Here, solid dispersion (SD) techniques were utilized to improve the oral bioavailability of tadalafil (TDF)."( Tadalafil solid dispersion formulations based on PVP/VA S-630: Improving oral bioavailability in rats.
Byeon, JC; Choi, JS; Jang, WS; Lee, SE; Park, JS, 2017
)
2.12
" One way to increase the bioavailability of these drugs is to use a supersaturating drug delivery strategy."( Development of a Video-Microscopic Tool To Evaluate the Precipitation Kinetics of Poorly Water Soluble Drugs: A Case Study with Tadalafil and HPMC.
Andersen, K; Christfort, JF; Madsen, CM; Müllertz, A; Nielsen, LH; Plum, J; Rades, T; Sandau, M, 2017
)
0.66
"Co-amorphous drug delivery systems are a promising approach to improve the dissolution rate and therefore potentially the oral bioavailability of poorly-water soluble drugs."( Aspartame as a co-former in co-amorphous systems.
Grohganz, H; Knuhtsen, A; Löbmann, K; Pedersen, DS; Rades, T; Schnitzkewitz, J; Wu, W, 2018
)
0.48
"The ability to increase the bioavailability and dissolution of poorly soluble hydrophobic drugs has been a major challenge for pharmaceutical development."( Enhancement of the apparent solubility and bioavailability of Tadalafil nanoparticles via antisolvent precipitation.
Guan, S; Huang, D; Li, Q; Liu, Y; Lu, T; Luo, D; Pan, P; Qiu, Z; Rao, Q; Zhang, L; Zhang, ZJ, 2019
)
0.75
" More importantly, the samples prepared by such strategy exhibited a substantially improved bioavailability compared to the samples that were prepared by either spray-dried or hot-melt extruded processes."( Hot melt extrusion of heat-sensitive and high melting point drug: Inhibit the recrystallization of the prepared amorphous drug during extrusion to improve the bioavailability.
Guan, S; Huang, D; Li, Q; Liamas, E; Lu, M; Pan, P; Rao, Q; Xie, Z; Zhang, ZJ, 2019
)
0.51
" In part 2, granulation size was found to not affect the relative bioavailability of the selected formulation."( A Phase I Study to Show the Relative Bioavailability and Bioequivalence of Fixed-Dose Combinations of Ambrisentan and Tadalafil in Healthy Subjects.
Berni, A; Chen, G; Khindri, S; Okour, M; Port, K; Puri, A; Schneider, I; Tenero, D, 2019
)
0.72
"This study aims at improving the bioavailability of a poorly soluble phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor; tadalafil (TD) via developing intranasal (IN) nanoemulsions (NEs)."( Intranasal Tadalafil nanoemulsions: formulation, characterization and pharmacodynamic evaluation.
Abdelmonsif, DA; Boraie, N; Elbardisy, B; Galal, S, 2019
)
1.12
" Other covariate effects were that bosentan increased CL/F, V/F decreased with decreasing body weight, and bioavailability (F) decreased with increasing dose and decreasing age."( Population Pharmacokinetics of Tadalafil in Pediatric Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Combined Adult/Pediatric Model.
Ferguson-Sells, L; Li, B; Small, D; Velez de Mendizabal, N, 2022
)
1.01
"A one-compartment model parameterized in terms of F, absorption rate constant, CL/F, and V/F described the data well."( Population Pharmacokinetics of Tadalafil in Pediatric Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Combined Adult/Pediatric Model.
Ferguson-Sells, L; Li, B; Small, D; Velez de Mendizabal, N, 2022
)
1.01
" The oral bioavailability of this formulation is higher than that of the parent drug."( Lodenafil.
Al-Majed, AA; Alshehri, YM; Attwa, MW; Bakheit, AH, 2022
)
0.72

Dosage Studied

Chronic dosing of tadalafil improves QoL of patients post-nsRP. A recent randomised, controlled Phase II trial revealed that tadalfil dosed once daily was well tolerated. The percentage of patients who achieved a normal EF domain score depended on the severity of erectile dysfunction.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" The efficacy and safety of on-demand dosing of IC351 in men with erectile dysfunction was assessed in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study."( On-demand IC351 (Cialis) enhances erectile function in patients with erectile dysfunction.
Ferguson, KM; McMurray, JG; Padma-Nathan, H; Pullman, WE; Rosen, RC; Saoud, JB; Whitaker, JS, 2001
)
0.31
" After a 10- to 21-day washout period, subjects crossed over to either placebo or tadalafil, and nitrate dosing was repeated."( Time course of the interaction between tadalafil and nitrates.
Denne, J; Emmick, JT; Hutter, AM; Jackson, G; Kloner, RA; Mitchell, MI, 2003
)
0.81
" Although the study sought to mimic the experience of actual patients receiving treatment for ED, the results are subject to potential limitations due to the design of the study, which included differences in dosing instructions and dosages for sildenafil and tadalafil."( Switching patients with erectile dysfunction from sildenafil citrate to tadalafil: results of a European multicenter, open-label study of patient preference.
Costigan, T; Murphy, A; Ströberg, P, 2003
)
0.73
"To assess patient preference for erectile dysfunction treatment between either sildenafil or tadalafil, each administered with their respective dosing instructions, and to evaluate preference for either sildenafil or tadalafil dosing instructions during tadalafil therapy."( A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover study to evaluate patient preference between tadalafil and sildenafil.
Beasley, CM; Costigan, T; Denne, J; Emmick, JT; Lockhart, D; Murphy, A; Rajfer, J; Segal, S; von Keitz, A, 2004
)
0.76
" Because the dosing instructions for sildenafil and tadalafil are different, a unique methodology using sham placebo arms was employed to maintain the blind."( A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover study to evaluate patient preference between tadalafil and sildenafil.
Beasley, CM; Costigan, T; Denne, J; Emmick, JT; Lockhart, D; Murphy, A; Rajfer, J; Segal, S; von Keitz, A, 2004
)
0.79
"In the doses utilized in this study, 73% of patients preferred tadalafil with tadalafil dosing instructions for the treatment of their erectile dysfunction over sildenafil with sildenafil dosing instructions."( A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover study to evaluate patient preference between tadalafil and sildenafil.
Beasley, CM; Costigan, T; Denne, J; Emmick, JT; Lockhart, D; Murphy, A; Rajfer, J; Segal, S; von Keitz, A, 2004
)
0.78
" Tadalafil was effective up to 36 h after dosing and was effective regardless of disease severity and causes, and in patients of all ages."( The efficacy and safety of tadalafil: an update.
Carrier, S; Carson, CC; Cordell, WH; Denne, JS; Eardley, I; Rajfer, J; Shen, W; Walker, DJ, 2004
)
1.53
"To determine the population dose-response relationship for tadalafil during on-demand (as-needed) administration for treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED)."( Population dose-response model for tadalafil in the treatment of male erectile dysfunction.
Allerheiligen, SR; Forgue, ST; Mackie, A; Rapado, J; Staab, A; Tillmann, C; Trocóniz, IF, 2004
)
0.84
"The dose-response relationship for each efficacy variable was best described with an Emax model, in which maximum effect increased with ED severity at baseline."( Population dose-response model for tadalafil in the treatment of male erectile dysfunction.
Allerheiligen, SR; Forgue, ST; Mackie, A; Rapado, J; Staab, A; Tillmann, C; Trocóniz, IF, 2004
)
0.6
"Population dose-response modeling of all five oucome measures indicated that efficacy in all ED severity groups in the studied population generally increased across the 2 to 25 mg tadalafil dose range."( Population dose-response model for tadalafil in the treatment of male erectile dysfunction.
Allerheiligen, SR; Forgue, ST; Mackie, A; Rapado, J; Staab, A; Tillmann, C; Trocóniz, IF, 2004
)
0.79
" Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate were recorded before dosing and for 24 hours after dosing."( Interaction between the phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor, tadalafil and 2 alpha-blockers, doxazosin and tamsulosin in healthy normotensive men.
Bedding, A; Emmick, JT; Jackson, G; Kloner, RA; Mitchell, MI; Pereira, A; Warner, MR, 2004
)
0.57
"To examine the preference for 2 dosing regimens (on demand or 3 times/week) for tadalafil, a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor with a duration of effectiveness up to 36 hours in men with erectile dysfunction (ED)."( An evaluation of an alternative dosing regimen with tadalafil, 3 times/week, for men with erectile dysfunction: SURE study in 14 European countries.
Chan, M; Cordell, WH; Costa, P; Damber, JE; Holmes, S; Lembo, D; Mirone, V; Moncada, I; Van Ahlen, H; Varanese, L; Wespes, E, 2005
)
0.81
" The two regimens provide additional treatment options by giving men with erectile dysfunction unique flexibility in dosing with tadalafil."( An evaluation of an alternative dosing regimen with tadalafil, 3 times/week, for men with erectile dysfunction: SURE study in 14 European countries.
Chan, M; Cordell, WH; Costa, P; Damber, JE; Holmes, S; Lembo, D; Mirone, V; Moncada, I; Van Ahlen, H; Varanese, L; Wespes, E, 2005
)
0.78
" The review is aimed at providing comparative clinical pharmacology data to allow for scientifically rational, evidence-based prescribing and dosing decisions regarding the clinical use of these medications for the treatment of erectile dysfunction."( The clinical pharmacokinetics of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction.
Gupta, M; Kovar, A; Meibohm, B, 2005
)
0.33
" A post hoc analysis was used to determine the proportion of men with ED who attempted sexual intercourse during various intervals (>0 to < or = 1, >1 to < or = 4, and >4 to < or = 36, including >12 to < or = 36 h) after dosing with tadalafil or placebo over a 12-week period."( Time from dosing to sexual intercourse attempts in men taking tadalafil in clinical trials.
Ahuja, S; Burnett, AL; Eardley, I; Ellsworth, PI; Garcia, CS; Natanegara, F; Shabsigh, R; Sharlip, ID, 2005
)
0.75
"To describe the pattern of sexual attempts by men with erectile dysfunction (ED) taking tadalafil 20 mg on demand or on an alternative dosing regimen, 3 times/week, and to assess changes in sexual behavior when the patients were exposed to the alternative regimen."( Sexual intercourse attempt patterns with two dosing regimens of tadalafil in men with erectile dysfunction: results from the SURE study in 14 European countries.
Casariego, J; Chan, M; Damber, JE; Mirone, V; Moncada, I; Varanese, L; Wespes, E, 2005
)
0.79
"Patients on tadalafil changed their sexual behavior significantly when on an alternative dosing regimen (3 times/week) and had sexual attempts distributed over a wide period of time post dosing."( Sexual intercourse attempt patterns with two dosing regimens of tadalafil in men with erectile dysfunction: results from the SURE study in 14 European countries.
Casariego, J; Chan, M; Damber, JE; Mirone, V; Moncada, I; Varanese, L; Wespes, E, 2005
)
0.95
"Compared with pretreatment and on-demand tadalafil baseline, daily dosed tadalafil significantly enhanced all efficacy outcome variables."( Efficacy and safety of daily tadalafil in men with erectile dysfunction previously unresponsive to on-demand tadalafil.
McMahon, C, 2004
)
0.88
" Using a stopwatch, couples recorded in Sexual Encounter Profile diaries the earliest time within 30 minutes after dosing to the first erection adequate for vaginal penetration, and whether the erection led to successful intercourse."( Determining the earliest time within 30 minutes to erectogenic effect after tadalafil 10 and 20 mg: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, at-home study.
Padma-Nathan, H; Pullman, W; Rosen, RC; Saikali, K; Shabsigh, R; Watkins, V, 2004
)
0.55
"This stopwatch-based study demonstrated a pharmacodynamic effect within 30 minutes after dosing for tadalafil 10 and 20 mg."( Determining the earliest time within 30 minutes to erectogenic effect after tadalafil 10 and 20 mg: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, at-home study.
Padma-Nathan, H; Pullman, W; Rosen, RC; Saikali, K; Shabsigh, R; Watkins, V, 2004
)
0.77
" Fifty-nine percent of intercourse attempts were within 4 hours of dosing when patients were treated with tadalafil (88% with sildenafil)."( Timing of dose relative to sexual intercourse attempt in previous sildenafil citrate users treated with tadalafil.
Dyachkova, Y; Gatchalian, E; Glina, S; Kopernicky, V; Markey, C; Sotomayor, M; Yaman, O, 2006
)
0.76
"Following the dosing instructions reflecting tadalafil's extended period of effectiveness, men with a history of established sildenafil use changed their dose-attempt behavior when treated with tadalafil."( Timing of dose relative to sexual intercourse attempt in previous sildenafil citrate users treated with tadalafil.
Dyachkova, Y; Gatchalian, E; Glina, S; Kopernicky, V; Markey, C; Sotomayor, M; Yaman, O, 2006
)
0.81
" Phase 2: true non-responders were given new instructions based on drugs' pharmacologic profiles: TGs were dosed at least 2 h before intercourse; VGs were dosed only in fasted state."( Treatment strategy for "non-responders" to tadalafil and vardenafil: a real-life study.
Bekos, A; Hatzichristou, D; Hatzimouratidis, K; Ioannidis, E; Moysidis, K; Tsimtsiou, Z, 2006
)
0.6
" Phase 2, 22 of 88 (25%) responded to dosing in a fasted state."( Treatment strategy for "non-responders" to tadalafil and vardenafil: a real-life study.
Bekos, A; Hatzichristou, D; Hatzimouratidis, K; Ioannidis, E; Moysidis, K; Tsimtsiou, Z, 2006
)
0.6
" tadalafil and for their respective dosing instructions in a cohort of Spanish patients with erectile dysfunction (ED)."( [Tadalafil vs sildenafil patient preference in Spanish men with erectile dysfunction: results from an International Multicentric Study].
Casariego, J; Cassinello, A; Lledó García, E; Mo, D; Rajmil, O; Rodríguez Vela, L, 2006
)
2.15
" Similarly, to evaluate preference for their respective dosing instructions, 30 patients were randomized to one of the 2 arms treated with tadalafil: one with sildenafil (S) dosing instructions and the other with tadalafil (T) dosing instructions."( [Tadalafil vs sildenafil patient preference in Spanish men with erectile dysfunction: results from an International Multicentric Study].
Casariego, J; Cassinello, A; Lledó García, E; Mo, D; Rajmil, O; Rodríguez Vela, L, 2006
)
1.45
" Correspondingly, 73% of 13 evaluating each drug dosing instructions preferred T dosing instructions (p>0."( [Tadalafil vs sildenafil patient preference in Spanish men with erectile dysfunction: results from an International Multicentric Study].
Casariego, J; Cassinello, A; Lledó García, E; Mo, D; Rajmil, O; Rodríguez Vela, L, 2006
)
1.24
"In this study, 7 out of 10 patients preferred tadalafil and its dosing instructions to sildenafil, for the treatment of their ED."( [Tadalafil vs sildenafil patient preference in Spanish men with erectile dysfunction: results from an International Multicentric Study].
Casariego, J; Cassinello, A; Lledó García, E; Mo, D; Rajmil, O; Rodríguez Vela, L, 2006
)
1.5
"5-h half-life of tadalafil enables therapeutic plasma levels to be sustained with daily administration, tadalafil is a good candidate for once daily dosing therapy."( Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of once-a-day dosing of tadalafil 5mg and 10mg in the treatment of erectile dysfunction: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Casabé, AR; Elion-Mboussa, A; Giuliano, F; Glina, S; Porst, H; Ralph, D; Shen, W; Whitaker, JS, 2006
)
0.91
" A recent randomised, controlled Phase II trial of tadalafil versus placebo for the treatment of symptomatic BPH revealed that tadalafil dosed once daily was well tolerated and demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful efficacy in the treatment of LUTS secondary to BPH and improved erectile function in men with both LUTS and ED."( Tadalafil for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Gonzalez, RR; Kaplan, SA, 2006
)
2.03
"The efficacy and safety of tadalafil, dosed once a day for the treatment of erectile dysfunction, was assessed in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-design study at 15 US centers."( Tadalafil dosed once a day in men with erectile dysfunction: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in the US.
Aliotta, PJ; Fitch, WP; Rajfer, J; Steidle, CP; Yu, A; Zhao, Y,
)
1.87
"To determine whether patient characteristics influence the efficacy of two tadalafil dosage regimens and to identify prognostic factors predictive of tadalafil efficacy."( Predictors of tadalafil efficacy in men with erectile dysfunction: the SURE study comparing two dosing regimens.
Buvat, J; Costa, P; Hamidi, K; Holmes, S; Petto, H; Varanese, L; Weitckus, S, 2006
)
0.92
" The percentage of patients who achieved a normal EF domain score and the percentages reporting positive responses to SEP3 and SEP5 depended on the severity of erectile dysfunction and the presence of certain comorbidities, irrespective of the tadalafil dosage regimen."( Predictors of tadalafil efficacy in men with erectile dysfunction: the SURE study comparing two dosing regimens.
Buvat, J; Costa, P; Hamidi, K; Holmes, S; Petto, H; Varanese, L; Weitckus, S, 2006
)
0.88
"On-demand and three-times-per-week dosage regimens of tadalafil 20 mg were equally efficacious in men with erectile dysfunction."( Predictors of tadalafil efficacy in men with erectile dysfunction: the SURE study comparing two dosing regimens.
Buvat, J; Costa, P; Hamidi, K; Holmes, S; Petto, H; Varanese, L; Weitckus, S, 2006
)
0.94
"To evaluate whether patterns of sexual activity and efficacy over time to two dosing regimens of tadalafil differ with ageing in men with erectile dysfunction (ED)."( The influence of age on treatment outcomes in men with erectile dysfunction treated with two regimens of tadalafil: results of the SURE study.
Chan, M; Jungwirth, A; Moncada, I; Schmitt, H; Varanese, L; Wespes, E, 2007
)
0.77
" A high percentage of attempts occurred >4 h after dosing for all age groups ( approximately 70% for men taking tadalafil three times per week and approximately 50% for men taking tadalafil on-demand)."( The influence of age on treatment outcomes in men with erectile dysfunction treated with two regimens of tadalafil: results of the SURE study.
Chan, M; Jungwirth, A; Moncada, I; Schmitt, H; Varanese, L; Wespes, E, 2007
)
0.76
" Tadalafil was effective up to 36 h after dosing for all age groups."( The influence of age on treatment outcomes in men with erectile dysfunction treated with two regimens of tadalafil: results of the SURE study.
Chan, M; Jungwirth, A; Moncada, I; Schmitt, H; Varanese, L; Wespes, E, 2007
)
1.46
"We assessed the efficacy and safety of tadalafil dosed once daily for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia."( Tadalafil relieves lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Auerbach, SM; Denes, BS; Esler, A; Kaminetsky, JC; McVary, KT; Roehrborn, CG; Sides, GD; Wachs, B; Young, JM, 2007
)
2.05
"To examine the preference for two dosing regimens of 20 mg of tadalafil, on demand or three times per week, in men affected with erectile dysfunction (ED) in Italy."( Evaluation of an alternative dosing regimen with tadalafil, three times per week, for men with erectile dysfunction: SURE study in Italy.
Fusco, F; Imbimbo, C; Longo, N; Mirone, V; Rossi, A; Sicuteri, R; Valle, D, 2007
)
0.83
"In an open-label, crossover study of sildenafil (25, 50 or 100 mg) and tadalafil (10 or 20 mg), dosed as needed, after a 4-week baseline assessment, 367 men with ED were randomly assigned to sildenafil followed by tadalafil or vice versa (8-week dose optimization and 4-week assessment phase for each treatment period)."( Factors associated with preference for sildenafil citrate and tadalafil for treating erectile dysfunction in men naïve to phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor therapy: post hoc analysis of data from a multicentre, randomized, open-label, crossover study.
Beardsworth, A; Chan, ML; Eardley, I; Jackson, G; Loughney, K; Mirone, V; Montorsi, F; Vail, GM, 2007
)
0.81
" Dosage choice, reductions in the PAIRS time concerns domain, IIEF intercourse satisfaction domain improvements, smaller side-effect severity scores, more sexual attempts, and increased SEP4 scores (satisfaction with erection hardness) during the tadalafil or sildenafil treatment periods were all significantly associated with preference for tadalafil or sildenafil."( Factors associated with preference for sildenafil citrate and tadalafil for treating erectile dysfunction in men naïve to phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor therapy: post hoc analysis of data from a multicentre, randomized, open-label, crossover study.
Beardsworth, A; Chan, ML; Eardley, I; Jackson, G; Loughney, K; Mirone, V; Montorsi, F; Vail, GM, 2007
)
0.76
" Patient differences in time concerns, dosage choice, intercourse satisfaction, treatment tolerability, number of sexual attempts and satisfaction with erection hardness were the set of factors most significantly associated with treatment preference, and the preference observed for tadalafil (71%) or sildenafil (29%) might be substantially accounted for by differences in these factors during the tadalafil and sildenafil treatment periods."( Factors associated with preference for sildenafil citrate and tadalafil for treating erectile dysfunction in men naïve to phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor therapy: post hoc analysis of data from a multicentre, randomized, open-label, crossover study.
Beardsworth, A; Chan, ML; Eardley, I; Jackson, G; Loughney, K; Mirone, V; Montorsi, F; Vail, GM, 2007
)
0.76
" The incidence of hypotension was low in healthy men given increasing doses of doxazosin with chronically dosed tadalafil or placebo."( Hemodynamic interaction between a daily dosed phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor, tadalafil, and the alpha-adrenergic blockers, doxazosin and tamsulosin, in middle-aged healthy male subjects.
Darstein, C; Guillaume, M; Jimenez, MC; Lonsdale, F; Mitchell, MI, 2007
)
0.78
"5 hours) and its prolonged period of responsiveness (36-hours), constitute an ideal pharmacokinetic profile for once-a-day dosing and makes it an ideal candidate for rehabilitative therapy in DM patients, whereas a poor compliance with on-demand schedule is reported."( Redefining the role of long-acting phosphodiesterase inhibitor tadalafil in the treatment of diabetic erectile dysfunction.
Aversa, A; Bruzziches, R; Francomano, D; Greco, EA; Pili, M; Spera, G, 2008
)
0.59
"With once-daily administration of tadalafil, dosing and sexual activity would no longer need to be temporally linked for patients with erectile dysfunction (ED)."( Long-term safety and efficacy of tadalafil 5 mg dosed once daily in men with erectile dysfunction.
Casabé, A; Esler, A; Feldman, R; Klise, SR; Porst, H; Rajfer, J; Ralph, D; Vieiralves, LF; Wolka, AM, 2008
)
0.91
"To evaluate long-term safety and efficacy of tadalafil 5 mg dosed once daily for the treatment of ED."( Long-term safety and efficacy of tadalafil 5 mg dosed once daily in men with erectile dysfunction.
Casabé, A; Esler, A; Feldman, R; Klise, SR; Porst, H; Rajfer, J; Ralph, D; Vieiralves, LF; Wolka, AM, 2008
)
0.89
"In these long-term, open-label, once-daily dosing studies, tadalafil 5 mg was well tolerated and effective, making it a viable alternative to the current on-demand dosing of tadalafil for men with ED."( Long-term safety and efficacy of tadalafil 5 mg dosed once daily in men with erectile dysfunction.
Casabé, A; Esler, A; Feldman, R; Klise, SR; Porst, H; Rajfer, J; Ralph, D; Vieiralves, LF; Wolka, AM, 2008
)
0.87
" International Prostate Symptom Score improvements at 4, 8 and 12 weeks were significant for all tadalafil doses and they demonstrated a dose-response relationship."( Tadalafil administered once daily for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a dose finding study.
Elion-Mboussa, A; McVary, KT; Roehrborn, CG; Viktrup, L, 2008
)
2.01
" In a multicenter, open-label study, 1911 men received tadalafil 20 mg dosed as needed (up to once daily), for 12 weeks following a 4-week treatment-free run-in period."( Response to treatment with tadalafil in men with erectile dysfunction who reported no successful intercourse attempts at baseline.
Kim, ED; Muram, D; Natanegara, F; Rosen, RC; Shabsigh, R; Shinghal, R; Wong, DG,
)
0.68
" Tadalafil is well-tolerated, consistent with the principle of safely, effectiveness and convenient dosing and is becoming the favorite choice of ED patients and their partners."( [Tadalafil for erectile dysfunction: outstanding efficacy for 36 hours].
Deng, SM, 2008
)
2.17
" Findings from an integrated analysis of trials of tadalafil 10 and 20 mg as needed are presented to provide context for the daily dosing regime."( Efficacy and safety of tadalafil once daily: considerations for the practical application of a daily dosing option.
Donatucci, CF; Dowsett, SA; Giuliano, F; Glina, S; Sorsaburu, S; Watts, S; Wong, DG, 2008
)
0.91
" For patients with a score lower than 26 in the erectile domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF15) and with total unsuccessful sexual attempts of more than 25% according to the Sexual Encounter Profile questions 2 and 3 (SEP2-3), the dosage of tadalafil was increased to 20 mg."( Efficacy and safety of medium and long-term tadalafil use in spinal cord patients with erectile dysfunction.
Cecconi, F; Del Popolo, G; Lombardi, G; Macchiarella, A, 2009
)
0.79
" Development of the first once-daily alternative dosing regimen with a PDE5 inhibitor was motivated by the behavioral complexities associated with sexual intimacy."( Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic overview of low-dose daily administration of tadalafil.
McGill, J; Sorsaburu, S; Strawbridge, A; Wong, D; Wrishko, R, 2009
)
0.58
"To provide an alternative dosing option for certain men who may benefit from the removal of the temporal linkage between administration of an ED therapy and sexual intimacy or for men and their partners who anticipate at least twice-weekly sexual activity."( Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic overview of low-dose daily administration of tadalafil.
McGill, J; Sorsaburu, S; Strawbridge, A; Wong, D; Wrishko, R, 2009
)
0.58
"Based upon pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic data, once-daily doses of tadalafil 5 mg were predicted to provide therapeutic concentrations that would be maintained throughout the 24-hour dosing interval."( Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic overview of low-dose daily administration of tadalafil.
McGill, J; Sorsaburu, S; Strawbridge, A; Wong, D; Wrishko, R, 2009
)
0.81
" Dosing instructions were provided."( Timing of dose relative to sexual intercourse attempt in previous sildenafil citrate users treated with tadalafil: a geographical comparison from a single arm, open-label study.
Abdo, CH; Gallagher, GL; Glina, S; Hernandez-Serrano, R; Lenero, E; Rampazzo, C; Rubio-Aurioles, E; Sotomayor, M; West, TM, 2009
)
0.57
" However, the extent to which sexual behavior alters is not uniform across geographical regions, suggesting that dosing instructions and duration of drug effectiveness, in combination with personal and cultural preferences, may determine sexual behavior with PDE5 inhibitor use."( Timing of dose relative to sexual intercourse attempt in previous sildenafil citrate users treated with tadalafil: a geographical comparison from a single arm, open-label study.
Abdo, CH; Gallagher, GL; Glina, S; Hernandez-Serrano, R; Lenero, E; Rampazzo, C; Rubio-Aurioles, E; Sotomayor, M; West, TM, 2009
)
0.57
" Daily dosing may be useful in some men; however, the other available PDE5I continue to show excellent efficacy in the management of erectile dysfunction (ED)."( 2009 update on phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor therapy part 2: updates on optimal utilization for sexual concerns and rare toxicities in this class.
Shindel, AW, 2009
)
0.35
" Interestingly in a pilot study of on-demand versus chronic administration of Tadalafil for 4 weeks, only regular dosing improved several markers of endothelial function."( [Chronic PDE-5 inhibition in patients with erectile dysfunction: new treatment approach using once daily Tadalafil].
Büttner, H; Hell-Momeni, K; Porst, H, 2009
)
0.8
" Although the tablets contained efficacious amounts of PDE-5 inhibitors, neither the active ingredient nor the dosage corresponded to the description on the blister."( The identification of (-)-trans-tadalafil, tadalafil, and sildenafil in counterfeit Cialis and the optical purity of tadalafil stereoisomers.
de Kaste, D; Venhuis, BJ; Vredenbregt, MJ; Zomer, G, 2010
)
0.64
" As the second PDE-5 inhibitor to gain approval for PAH, clinical properties such as its long half-life leading to once-daily dosing and possibly improved compliance, as well as potential cost benefit, may distinguish tadalafil from sildenafil in the widespread treatment of PAH."( Tadalafil for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Rosenzweig, EB, 2010
)
1.99
"There were significant improvements in edema, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), weight, and loop diuretic dosage required, while strong trends were seen in urine output per day and urine output per unit loop diuretic per day."( The successful use of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors to treat the syndrome of cor pulmonale and prerenal azotemia with diuresis of anasarca (CorPRADA).
Berez, PB, 2010
)
0.36
" Those with a score lower than 26 on the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15) and with less than 75% of total successful sexual attempts assessed by the Sexual Encounter Profile Questions 2 and 3 (SEP2-3) had their dosage of tadalafil increased to 20 mg, whereas responding subjects continued with 10 mg."( Efficacy and safety of tadalafil for erectile dysfunction in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Del Popolo, G; Lombardi, G; Macchiarella, A, 2010
)
0.85
"A simple and accurate method to determine tadalafil (TAD) in pure powder and tablet dosage form was developed and validated using HPLC."( Determination of tadalafil in pure powder and tablet dosage form by high-performance liquid chromatography.
Barot, TG; Patel, PK,
)
0.74
"The maximal beneficial effects of OAD dosing with 10 mg tadalafil may occur only after as many as 12 weeks."( Hypogonadal men nonresponders to the PDE5 inhibitor tadalafil benefit from normalization of testosterone levels with a 1% hydroalcoholic testosterone gel in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (TADTEST study).
Buvat, J; Colson, MH; Cuzin, B; Dean, JD; Eardley, I; Kaipia, A; Maggi, M; Martin-Morales, A; Meuleman, E; Moncada, I; Montorsi, F; Porst, H; Shabsigh, R; Yassin, A, 2011
)
0.87
" The prolonged half-life of tadalafil lends itself well to this dosing regimen and conveys the advantage of separating medication from sexual interactions; lower dose therapy also carries the theoretical benefit of lower incidence of side effects."( A once-daily dose of tadalafil for erectile dysfunction: compliance and efficacy.
Shindel, AW; Washington, SL, 2010
)
0.97
" Seventeen healthy male volunteers received sequential dosing of the studied product: TAD (day 1) alone in a single dose for 7 days followed by TAD (day 8) in a single dose with TPV/r (500/200 mg twice daily, days 8-18)."( Effect of tipranavir/ritonavir combination on the pharmacokinetics of tadalafil in healthy volunteers.
Dellamonica, P; Durant, J; Ferrando, S; Garraffo, R; Lavrut, T; MacGregor, TR; Rouyrre, N; Sabo, JP, 2011
)
0.6
" The 405 patients enrolled in the single pivotal trial give this drug the largest initial placebo-controlled dataset of any of the oral PAH therapies; its once-daily dosing and excellent safety profile make it the most convenient of the therapies by a significant margin."( Novel therapeutic approaches in pulmonary arterial hypertension: focus on tadalafil.
Levin, YD; White, RJ, 2011
)
0.6
" The longer half-life of tadalafil allows for once-daily dosing as compared with three-times daily dosing for sildenafil, the only other PDE-5 inhibitor currently approved for treatment of PAH."( Tadalafil for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Klinger, JR, 2011
)
2.12
"To compare the efficacy and safety of on-demand 20-mg tadalafil (arm A) with the newly released tadalafil 5-mg once-a-day dosing (arm B) in patients with ED following radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PC)."( Efficacy and safety of tadalafil 20 mg on demand vs. tadalafil 5 mg once-a-day in the treatment of post-radiotherapy erectile dysfunction in prostate cancer men: a randomized phase II trial.
Badellino, S; Ciammella, P; Filippi, AR; Gontero, P; Guarneri, A; Moretto, F; Munoz, F; Ragona, R; Ricardi, U; Rondi, N; Tizzani, A; Valentino, F, 2010
)
0.92
" The once-a-day 5-mg dosing showed higher compliance and marginally reduced side effects, thus making it an attractive alternative to on-demand therapy for ED in post-radiotherapy PC patients."( Efficacy and safety of tadalafil 20 mg on demand vs. tadalafil 5 mg once-a-day in the treatment of post-radiotherapy erectile dysfunction in prostate cancer men: a randomized phase II trial.
Badellino, S; Ciammella, P; Filippi, AR; Gontero, P; Guarneri, A; Moretto, F; Munoz, F; Ragona, R; Ricardi, U; Rondi, N; Tizzani, A; Valentino, F, 2010
)
0.67
" Giving ED patients the opportunity to try all the three inhibitors can greatly improve the treatment compliance of the patient, whereas the majority of ED patients prefer one specific drug to the others, frequently tadalafil, irrespective of the severity and etiology of the disease, dosing sequence, age of the patient, or dose of medication."( [ED patients and their female partners prefer tadalafil].
Gong, BS, 2011
)
0.81
"The purpose of this review is to evaluate the pharmacology, pharmacokinetic properties, clinical efficacy, adverse effects, drug interactions, and dosage and administration of tadalafil in patients with PAH."( Tadalafil: a long-acting phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Arif, SA; Poon, H, 2011
)
2
"Tadalafil once-daily provides efficacy comparable to on-demand dosing regimens with PDE-5 inhibitors, is well tolerated and allows patients and their partners to disconnect the administration of medication from sexual activity, thereby enabling them to return to the sex-life they had before the onset of erectile dysfunction."( Chronic PDE-5 inhibition in patients with erectile dysfunction - a treatment approach using tadalafil once-daily.
Büttner, H; Hell-Momeni, K; Porst, H, 2012
)
2.04
" There is level 5 evidence (expert opinion) that combination therapy of PDE5 inhibitors + L-arginine or daily dosing of tadalafil + short-acting PDE5 inhibitors pro re nata may rescue PDE5 inhibitor monotherapy failures."( SOP conservative (medical and mechanical) treatment of erectile dysfunction.
Brock, G; Burnett, A; Ghanem, H; Giuliano, F; Glina, S; Hellstrom, W; Martin-Morales, A; Porst, H; Salonia, A; Sharlip, I, 2013
)
0.6
"To assess persistence/adherence rates of phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor (PDE5I) on-demand dosing in Latin American men with erectile dysfunction (ED), and explore patient characteristics and treatment factors that may be predictive for PDE5I persistence and adherence."( A 6 month, prospective, observational study of PDE5 inhibitor treatment persistence and adherence in Latin American men with erectile dysfunction.
Borregales, L; Cairoli, C; Reyes, LA; Rubio-Aurioles, E; Sorsaburu, S, 2013
)
0.39
"Men from Brazil, Mexico, and Venezuela with ED who were naïve to PDE5Is were prescribed sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil, or lodenafil on-demand dosing and asked to provide information about PDE5I use at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months."( A 6 month, prospective, observational study of PDE5 inhibitor treatment persistence and adherence in Latin American men with erectile dysfunction.
Borregales, L; Cairoli, C; Reyes, LA; Rubio-Aurioles, E; Sorsaburu, S, 2013
)
0.61
" Persistence was defined as use of ≥1 dose during the prior 4 weeks, adherence as compliance with dosing instructions during the most recent dose."( A 6-month, prospective, observational study of PDE5 inhibitor treatment persistence and adherence in Middle Eastern and North African men with erectile dysfunction.
Al-Mitwalli, K; El-Meliegy, A; Gurbuz, S; Hussein, T; Istarabadi, M; Lei, Y; Mostafa, T; Rabah, D, 2013
)
0.39
" Both dosing schedules were well tolerated and no significant differences were observed in safety between the two groups."( [On-demand versus on-time dosing of tadalafil for erectile dysfunction: a prospective multi-center study].
Huang, YR; Jiang, ZX; Li, P; Li, Z; Liu, YF; Ma, M; Shen, ZJ; Tian, RH; Wang, GM; Wang, JL; Wang, YX; Wu, M; Yang, NQ; Zhong, S; Zhou, W, 2014
)
0.68
"On-time dosing of tadalafil is efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of ED, and has an even better effect than on-demand dosing at 8 weeks of medication and 1 month after withdrawal."( [On-demand versus on-time dosing of tadalafil for erectile dysfunction: a prospective multi-center study].
Huang, YR; Jiang, ZX; Li, P; Li, Z; Liu, YF; Ma, M; Shen, ZJ; Tian, RH; Wang, GM; Wang, JL; Wang, YX; Wu, M; Yang, NQ; Zhong, S; Zhou, W, 2014
)
1.01
"This study investigated the effects of tadalafil dosing on RhoA/ROCK signaling in bladder, in a rabbit model of high-fat diet (HFD)-induced MetS."( Tadalafil effect on metabolic syndrome-associated bladder alterations: an experimental study in a rabbit model.
Carini, M; Cellai, I; Comeglio, P; Filippi, S; Gacci, M; Maggi, M; Maneschi, E; Morelli, A; Sarchielli, E; Vannelli, GB; Vignozzi, L, 2014
)
2.11
" Tadalafil dosing normalized HFD-induced bladder hypersensitivity to Y-27632, by reducing RhoA membrane translocation and ROCK overexpression."( Tadalafil effect on metabolic syndrome-associated bladder alterations: an experimental study in a rabbit model.
Carini, M; Cellai, I; Comeglio, P; Filippi, S; Gacci, M; Maggi, M; Maneschi, E; Morelli, A; Sarchielli, E; Vannelli, GB; Vignozzi, L, 2014
)
2.76
"Tadalafil dosing reduced RhoA/ROCK signaling and smooth muscle overactivity in an animal model of MetS-associated bladder alterations."( Tadalafil effect on metabolic syndrome-associated bladder alterations: an experimental study in a rabbit model.
Carini, M; Cellai, I; Comeglio, P; Filippi, S; Gacci, M; Maggi, M; Maneschi, E; Morelli, A; Sarchielli, E; Vannelli, GB; Vignozzi, L, 2014
)
3.29
"A novel, precise, rapid and sensitive reverse phase high performance liquid chromatographic method has been developed for the validated estimation of Tadalafil in bulk and tablet dosage form."( Validation and method development of Tadalafil in bulk and tablet dosage form by RP-HPLC.
Bojanapu, A; Chennakesavalu, J; Dhanapal, K; Jayaprakash, V; Munusamy, J; Sellappan, M; Subramaniam, AT, 2015
)
0.89
" Persistence was defined as using ≥ 1 dose during the previous 4 - weeks, and adherence as following dosing instructions for the most recent dose, assessed using the Persistence and Adherence Questionnaire."( PDE5 inhibitor treatment persistence and adherence in Brazilian men: post-hoc analyses from a 6-month, prospective, observational study.
Cairoli, C; Henneges, C; Reyes, LA; Sorsaburu, S,
)
0.13
" Together, these results uncover a hitherto uncharacterized role of PDE5/cGMP/PKG signaling in bone homeostasis and provide the evidence that long-term treatment with PDE5 inhibitors at a high dosage may potentially cause bone catabolism."( Inhibition of phosphodiesterase 5 reduces bone mass by suppression of canonical Wnt signaling.
Chen, HX; Gong, Y; Hong, D; Hu, XH; Ji, X; Shi, W; Wang, HB; Wang, JR; Wu, XM; Xu, CY, 2014
)
0.4
" Sildenafil (SIL) and vardenafil (VAR) are approved for as-needed (PRN) dosing; tadalafil (TAD) is approved for both PRN and once-a-day (OaD) dosing for ED."( Comparative efficacy of tadalafil once daily in men with erectile dysfunction who demonstrated previous partial responses to as-needed sildenafil, tadalafil, or vardenafil.
Baygani, S; Burns, P; Goldfischer, E; Kim, E; Seftel, A, 2015
)
0.95
" The aim of this study was to compare the efficacies of two dosing regimens of 20 mg tadalafil (on-demand and 3 times per week) and to assess the role of tadalafil in recovery of erectile function and continence after BNSRP."( Effects of three-times-per-week versus on-demand tadalafil treatment on erectile function and continence recovery following bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective, randomized, and single-center study.
Atış, G; Canat, L; Çaşkurlu, T; Güner, B; Gürbüz, C, 2015
)
0.9
" More recently, tadalafil has been introduced allowing once daily dosing with apparently similar efficacy to sildenafil in children."( Risk-benefit considerations when prescribing phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors in children.
Bentley, S; Magee, AG; Makhecha, S, 2015
)
0.76
"025); scores were not significantly different between treatments for satisfaction with dosing or side-effects (both P ≥ 0."( Treatment satisfaction and clinically meaningful symptom improvement in men with lower urinary tract symptoms and prostatic enlargement secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: Secondary results from a 6-month, randomized, double-blind study comparing f
Casabé, A; Glina, S; Henneges, C; Roehrborn, CG; Sorsaburu, S; Viktrup, L, 2015
)
0.42
"These results suggest that chronic dosing of tadalafil improves QoL of patients post-nsRP."( Effects of tadalafil treatment after bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: quality of life, psychosocial outcomes, and treatment satisfaction results from a randomized, placebo-controlled phase IV study.
Andrianne, R; Barry, J; Branicka, J; Büttner, H; Chadwick, D; Cuzin, B; Hell-Momeni, K; Henneges, C; Ilo, D; Patel, HR; Shah, N, 2015
)
1.07
"A valid, sensitive and rapid spectrofluorimetric method has been developed and validated for determination of both tadalafil (TAD) and vardenafil (VAR) either in their pure form, in their tablet dosage forms or spiked in human plasma."( Validated spectrofluorimetric method for determination of two phosphodiesterase inhibitors tadalafil and vardenafil in pharmaceutical preparations and spiked human plasma.
Abu El-Enin, MA; Al-Ghaffar Hammouda, Mel-S; El-Ashry, SM; El-Sherbiny, DT; El-Wasseef, DR, 2016
)
0.86
" Therefore, a novel, accurate, specific and sensitive reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatographic method with fluorescence detection was developed and validated for their separation and quantitation in dosage form and human plasma using avanafil as an internal standard (IS)."( A novel liquid chromatographic method with fluorescence detection for quantitation of tadalafil and dapoxetine hydrochloride in pharmaceutical dosage form and human plasma.
Ahmed Emad, el G; Amira, K; Maha, H; Mohamed, A, 2015
)
0.64
"Oral dosing with bosentan and tadalafil in children may not achieve therapeutic blood concentration."( Pharmacokinetics of drugs for pediatric pulmonary hypertension.
Azuma, H; Kajihama, A; Kajino, H; Kamiyama, N; Maeda, J; Nakau, K; Oka, H; Sugimoto, M; Tasaki, Y; Yamagishi, H, 2016
)
0.72
"To provide a descriptive comparison of erectile function response for tadalafil on-demand (PRN) and once-daily (OAD) dosing regimens in patients with common comorbid conditions, treatments, or risk factors that can be considered when treating ED."( Efficacy of Continuous Dosing of Tadalafil Once Daily vs Tadalafil On Demand in Clinical Subgroups of Men With Erectile Dysfunction: A Descriptive Comparison Using the Integrated Tadalafil Databases.
Barry, J; Brock, G; D'Souza, D; Mulhall, J; Ni, X; Oelke, M; Rosenberg, M; Seftel, A, 2016
)
0.95
"Pharmacological advances in erectile dysfunction (ED) treatment have aroused growing interest among health professionals towards sexual dysfunction, generating an increasing demand for dosage forms and drug delivery systems, including tadalafil."( Technological Device for Manufacturing Transdermal Films: Possible Applications to the Individualized Treatment for Erectile Dysfunction.
Brandão, MAF; Ferreira, A; Polonini, HC; Raposo, FJ; Raposo, NRB, 2017
)
0.64
"PAH patients receiving a stable combination treatment with ERA and PDE-5i with targeted dosage for at least 1 month were routinely assessed, including clinical parameters and plasma drug concentrations."( Plasma Drug Concentrations in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension on Combination Treatment.
Benjamin, N; Burhenne, J; Egenlauf, B; Enderle, Y; Fischer, C; Grünig, E; Haefeli, WE; Harutyunova, S; Huppertz, A; Klose, H; Ohnesorge, J, 2017
)
0.46
"To compare the efficacy and safety between tadalafil once-a-day and tadalafil on-demand dosing regimen in patients with ED."( Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil Once-a-Day versus Tadalafil On-Demand in Patients with Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.
Dong, Q; Liu, L; Peng, Z; Wei, Q; Yang, B; Yang, L, 2017
)
1.03
"A systematic search of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library was performed to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared tadalafil used a once-a-day with an on-demand dosing regimen for erectile dysfunction."( Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil Once-a-Day versus Tadalafil On-Demand in Patients with Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.
Dong, Q; Liu, L; Peng, Z; Wei, Q; Yang, B; Yang, L, 2017
)
0.97
" Meta-analyses of Sexual Encounter Profile questions 2 and 3 (SEP-2 and SEP-3) showed that the once-a-day dosing regimen was superior to the on-demand regimen with statistical significance."( Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil Once-a-Day versus Tadalafil On-Demand in Patients with Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.
Dong, Q; Liu, L; Peng, Z; Wei, Q; Yang, B; Yang, L, 2017
)
0.77
" The 40-mg/day dosage was tried in six cases as the dosage was considered to be high."( Safety and dose-finding trial of tadalafil administered for fetal growth restriction: A phase-1 clinical study.
Ikeda, T; Kamimoto, Y; Kondo, E; Kubo, M; Maki, S; Murabayashi, N; Nii, M; Osato, K; Tanaka, H; Umekawa, T, 2017
)
0.74
" Eight studies that examined the desired dosing regimens were identified."( The Efficacy of Tadalafil Daily vs on Demand in the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Bansal, UK; Fuller, TW; Jackman, SV; Jones, C; Wessel, C, 2018
)
0.83
"Sildenafil and tadalafil are widely-used phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitors for which no clear dose-response relationship could be established."( Cyclic guanosine monophosphate modulates accumulation of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors in human platelets.
Bajraktari, G; Bugert, P; Burhenne, J; Haefeli, WE; Weiss, J, 2017
)
0.81
" Because various PDE5Is vary in their duration of action and dosage regimen, this may be an important consideration in selecting the optimal agent for the ED patient."( Sexual habits of men with ED who take phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors: a survey conducted in 7 countries.
Hassan, TA; Mulhall, JP; Rienow, J, 2018
)
0.48
" The time to sexual intercourse after dosing was ≤1 hour for 70% and ≤4 hours for 96% of men."( Sexual habits of men with ED who take phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors: a survey conducted in 7 countries.
Hassan, TA; Mulhall, JP; Rienow, J, 2018
)
0.48
" The two models were applied on the dosage forms and statistically compared with the published HPLC method with no significant difference regarding accuracy and precision."( Linear Support Vector Regression and Partial Least-Squares for Determination of Dapoxetine Hydrochloride and Tadalafil in Binary Pharmaceutical Mixtures.
Abdelhamid, NS; Anwar, BH; Magdy, MA; Naguib, IA, 2020
)
0.77
" Furthermore, the methods were successfully applied for the quantification of the two drugs in their combined dosage form."( Smart spectrophotometric assessment of tamsulosin hydrochloride and tadalafil in their new pharmaceutical formulation for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia and erectile dysfunction.
Rezk, MR; Tantawy, MA; Wadie, M; Weshahy, SA, 2020
)
0.79
" The presented study is using previously analyzed pharmaceutical mixtures of Dapoxetine Hydrochloride (DAP) and Tadalafil (TAD) as a case study, whether in pure forms or in dosage form, where the study uses two datasets for analysis, the first aims to include COA and the second dataset avoids it, then a statistical comparison is conducted for training sets, test sets and dosage form datasets to see how far COA may interfere with analysis results."( Ultraviolet cutoff area and predictive ability of partial least squares regression method: A pharmaceutical case study.
Abdallah, FF; Naguib, IA, 2020
)
0.77
"A rapid, smart and sensitive first derivative spectrofluorimetric method has been carried out for the simultaneous estimation of avanafil and tadalafil either in their pure form, tablet dosage form or spiked human plasma."( D-optimal design as a useful tool response surface methodology for the optimization of signals from synchronous fluorescence prior to simultaneous determination of avanafil and tadalafil.
Abdel-Raoof, AM; Abdelzaher, AM; El-Desouky, EA; Emara, MS; Hasan, MA; Osman, AE; Said, RAM, 2020
)
0.95
" A sensitive, efficient and rapid assay was selected satisfactorily and applied for simultaneous determination of citalopram and tadalafil either in their pure forms, in tablet dosage forms or in spiked human plasma."( Simultaneous determination of citalopram and tadalafil by the second derivative synchronous fluorescence method in biological fluids; application of Box-Behnken optimization design.
Abdel-Fattah, A; Abdel-Raoof, AM; Eissa, MS; Hasan, MA; Madkour, AW, 2021
)
1.09
" PK data from the studies were pooled to develop a pediatric population PK model for tadalafil that characterized relationships among dose, exposure, and the effects of covariates with an aim to develop a population PK model that could simulate concentration-time profiles and assess exposure-matched dosing strategies in a pediatric PAH population."( Population Pharmacokinetics of Tadalafil in Pediatric Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Combined Adult/Pediatric Model.
Ferguson-Sells, L; Li, B; Small, D; Velez de Mendizabal, N, 2022
)
1.23
" The model demonstrated that plasma tadalafil concentrations in pediatric patients aged 2 to < 18 years were similar to those in adults at similar doses, and confirmed that dosing of 40 mg once daily in pediatric patients with a bodyweight ≥ 40 kg, and a dose of 20 mg once daily in patients with a body weight < 40 kg and aged ≥ 2 years are suitable for phase III evaluation."( Population Pharmacokinetics of Tadalafil in Pediatric Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Combined Adult/Pediatric Model.
Ferguson-Sells, L; Li, B; Small, D; Velez de Mendizabal, N, 2022
)
1.28
" This study is the first to develop and optimize a synchronous spectrofluorimetric method coupled with derivative and derivative ratio mathematical tools for the determination of tamsulosin andtadalafil in their newly released dosage form."( Assay of new combination of tamsulosin and tadalafil using synchronous spectrofluorimetric method coupled with mathematical tools.
Abdelhafez, AM; Gawad, DA; Hassan, EM; M Youssef, R, 2022
)
1.17
" To detect treatment effects may require different dosing regimens."( The PASTIS trial: Testing tadalafil for possible use in vascular cognitive impairment.
Barrick, TR; Benjamin, P; Betteridge, S; Binnie, LR; Clarke, B; Dhillon, MK; Ghatala, R; Hainsworth, AH; Hainsworth, FAH; Howe, FA; Isaacs, JD; Khan, U; Kruuse, C; Madigan, JB; Moynihan, B; Patel, B; Pauls, MMH; Pereira, AC; Rostrup, E; Shtaya, ABY; Spilling, CA; Trippier, S; Williams, R; Young, R, 2022
)
1.02
"In this study, the drug kinetics of tadalafil were compared between pregnant and non-pregnant women to determine the ideal dosage to promote uterine blood flow."( Maternal blood concentration of tadalafil in pregnancy: Comparison of pregnant and non-pregnant women.
Enomoto, N; Ikeda, T; Katsuragi, S; Maki, S; Takakura, S; Tanaka, H; Tanaka, K, 2022
)
1.28
" The article also discusses the methods for preparation of lodenafil, its physical-chemical properties, analytical methods for its determination, pharmacological-toxicological properties, and dosing information."( Lodenafil.
Al-Majed, AA; Alshehri, YM; Attwa, MW; Bakheit, AH, 2022
)
0.72
" That approach was utilized to estimation of the cited drugs in dosage forms, simultaneously with %recoveries for tadalafil and finasteride of 99."( Synchronous fluorescence as a green and selective method for the simultaneous determination of finasteride and tadalafil in dosage form and spiked human plasma.
Abdelaziz, A; Batekh, AE; Emad, N; Galal, M; Hussien, M; Karem, M; Moukhtar, DA; Salem, H, 2023
)
1.33
" Between May 2020 and December 2022, we retrospectively analyzed the records of 126 ED patients who underwent Li-ESWT post unsuccessful PDE5is trials, defined as inadequate response following at least 6 consistent trials with correct dosage (preference given to 20 mg tadalafil)."( Non-invasive alternative for phosphodiesterase inhibitor-refractory erectile dysfunction: Real-life experience with low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy.
Bayraktar, N, 2023
)
1.09
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (2)

RoleDescription
EC 3.1.4.35 (3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase) inhibitorAn EC 3.1.4.* (phosphoric diester hydrolase) inhibitor that blocks the action of 3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase (EC 3.1.4.35).
vasodilator agentA drug used to cause dilation of the blood vessels.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (2)

ClassDescription
pyrazinopyridoindole
benzodioxoles
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Protein Targets (83)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Chain A, Beta-lactamaseEscherichia coli K-12Potency39.81070.044717.8581100.0000AID485341
acetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)Potency20.67160.002541.796015,848.9004AID1347395; AID1347398
USP1 protein, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency89.12510.031637.5844354.8130AID743255
nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group I, member 3Homo sapiens (human)Potency16.57470.001022.650876.6163AID1224838; AID1224893
cytochrome P450 family 3 subfamily A polypeptide 4Homo sapiens (human)Potency2.68250.01237.983543.2770AID1346984; AID1645841
retinoic acid nuclear receptor alpha variant 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency26.60320.003041.611522,387.1992AID1159553
pregnane X nuclear receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency7.94330.005428.02631,258.9301AID1346985
estrogen nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency22.42090.000229.305416,493.5996AID743080; AID743091
GVesicular stomatitis virusPotency19.49710.01238.964839.8107AID1645842
cytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)Potency24.54540.00108.379861.1304AID1645840
euchromatic histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2Homo sapiens (human)Potency0.79430.035520.977089.1251AID504332
aryl hydrocarbon receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency26.60320.000723.06741,258.9301AID743085
importin subunit beta-1 isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency20.59625.804836.130665.1308AID540253
mitogen-activated protein kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency3.98110.039816.784239.8107AID1454
snurportin-1Homo sapiens (human)Potency20.59625.804836.130665.1308AID540253
GTP-binding nuclear protein Ran isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency20.59625.804816.996225.9290AID540253
Interferon betaHomo sapiens (human)Potency19.49710.00339.158239.8107AID1645842
HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)Potency19.49710.01238.964839.8107AID1645842
Spike glycoproteinSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusPotency1.41250.009610.525035.4813AID1479145
Inositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency19.49710.01238.964839.8107AID1645842
cytochrome P450 2C9, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency19.49710.01238.964839.8107AID1645842
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Chain A, cAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.00120.00001.947220.0000AID977608
Chain A, cAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.00120.00001.947220.0000AID977608
Chain A, cAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.00120.00001.947220.0000AID977608
Chain A, cAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.00120.00001.947220.0000AID977608
Chain A, cAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.00120.00001.947220.0000AID977608
Chain A, cAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.00120.00001.947220.0000AID977608
Chain A, cAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.00120.00001.947220.0000AID977608
Chain A, cAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.00120.00001.947220.0000AID977608
Chain A, cAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.00120.00001.947220.0000AID977608
Chain A, cAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.00120.00001.947220.0000AID977608
Chain A, cAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.00120.00001.947220.0000AID977608
Chain B, cAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.00120.00001.947220.0000AID977608
Chain A, cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.00120.00001.947220.0000AID977608
Chain A, cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.00120.00001.947220.0000AID977608
Phosphodiesterase Bos taurus (cattle)IC50 (µMol)10.00000.10005.88009.9000AID159197
cGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)64.45070.00001.77679.2000AID1421855; AID159061; AID1598436; AID1797296; AID240958; AID735486
ATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.63154.45319.3000AID1473740
Multidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.20005.677410.0000AID1473741
Retinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit deltaHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)2.92800.00051.13535.2000AID158129; AID1872578; AID240763; AID240962; AID735483
cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki0.00500.00180.00390.0050AID239083
High affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8AHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)72.22940.00001.85239.2000AID1421862; AID1598441; AID1797296; AID735481
cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)37.74140.00001.18439.6140AID1321699; AID1380124; AID1380338; AID1384205; AID1421852; AID1555534; AID157949; AID157951; AID1598427; AID1659411; AID1797296; AID240961; AID366091; AID477863; AID566802; AID735487
cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)Ki0.00760.00071.07978.5000AID1421850; AID238296
High affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9AHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)10.00000.00801.16175.6000AID1421863; AID1598442; AID240504; AID735479
Bile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.11007.190310.0000AID1473738
Retinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaBos taurus (cattle)IC50 (µMol)5.10000.01980.75935.1000AID158123
Rod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit alphaBos taurus (cattle)IC50 (µMol)4.05000.01980.93945.1000AID158123; AID454866
Calcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1A Bos taurus (cattle)IC50 (µMol)10.00000.40002.23759.9000AID158753
Potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)204.83900.12004.048010.0000AID1207388; AID1207415
Rod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)2.92800.00051.22825.2000AID158129; AID1872578; AID240763; AID240962; AID735483
Cone cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit alpha'Bos taurus (cattle)IC50 (µMol)5.10000.01980.66855.1000AID158123
Retinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)2.92800.00051.22825.2000AID158129; AID1872578; AID240763; AID240962; AID735483
Retinal cone rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaBos taurus (cattle)IC50 (µMol)5.10000.01980.75935.1000AID158123
Rod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit betaBos taurus (cattle)IC50 (µMol)5.10000.01980.75935.1000AID158123
cAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4AHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)9.84000.00001.068010.0000AID1421857; AID159782; AID1598438; AID240960; AID735484
Rod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit betaHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)2.92800.00051.22825.2000AID158129; AID1872578; AID240763; AID240962; AID735483
AcetylcholinesteraseRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)26.15900.00020.52597.2000AID1555532
Cone cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit alpha'Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)3.57740.00050.90595.2000AID1421858; AID158129; AID1598439; AID1872578; AID240763; AID240962; AID735483
Potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)204.83900.12004.048010.0000AID1207388; AID1207415
Calcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1AHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)10.00000.23002.510510.0000AID1421854; AID1598435; AID240957; AID735477
Calcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1BBos taurus (cattle)IC50 (µMol)10.00000.40002.23759.9000AID158753
Calcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1BHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)72.22940.00002.14179.2000AID1598435; AID1797296; AID240957; AID735477
Synaptic vesicular amine transporterRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)0.01200.00100.01460.1000AID410413
cAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)66.90070.00001.104010.0000AID159782; AID1598438; AID1797296; AID240960; AID566805; AID735484
cAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4CHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)9.80000.00001.465110.0000AID159782; AID1598438; AID240960; AID735484
cAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)68.02740.00001.146310.0000AID159782; AID1598438; AID1797296; AID240960; AID735484
Potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)101.33140.00091.901410.0000AID1207482; AID1207509; AID1207542; AID392051
cGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase BHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)65.95360.00002.072410.0000AID1421856; AID1598437; AID1797296; AID240959; AID566803; AID566804; AID735485
Voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)398.10700.00032.25459.6000AID1207295
High affinity cAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 7AHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)10.00000.09001.63104.6900AID1421861; AID1598440; AID240963; AID735482
Retinal cone rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)2.92800.00051.22825.2000AID158129; AID1872578; AID240763; AID240962; AID735483
Calcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1CHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)10.00000.23001.98149.0000AID1598435; AID240957; AID735477
cGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase AHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)10.00000.00031.990110.0000AID1598437; AID240959; AID735485
Sodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)142.19100.00033.64849.2000AID1207328; AID1207355
cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseBos taurus (cattle)IC50 (µMol)0.00750.00331.624010.0000AID157928; AID305334; AID410413; AID454868; AID659075
Canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00002.41006.343310.0000AID1473739
Retinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit deltaBos taurus (cattle)IC50 (µMol)5.10000.01980.75935.1000AID158123
Dual 3',5'-cyclic-AMP and -GMP phosphodiesterase 11AHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)49.63290.00001.97009.2000AID1421860; AID159035; AID1598444; AID1797296; AID240764; AID241009; AID410415; AID454867; AID566806; AID566807; AID735478
cAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 7BHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)72.22940.00002.05139.2000AID1598440; AID1797296; AID240963; AID735482
cAMP and cAMP-inhibited cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 10AHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)68.08070.00001.49049.2000AID1421864; AID1598443; AID1797296; AID241008; AID735480
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Activation Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)EC50 (µMol)0.07800.07803.69279.0000AID1421871
cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)5.81001.00003.40505.8100AID1750322
Nuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)5.00005.00005.00005.0000AID1810681
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (340)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
negative regulation of cell adhesionPhosphodiesterase Bos taurus (cattle)
negative regulation of angiogenesisPhosphodiesterase Bos taurus (cattle)
negative regulation of lipid catabolic processPhosphodiesterase Bos taurus (cattle)
heart valve developmentcGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
ventricular septum developmentcGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
aorta developmentcGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIcGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-inhibiting G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwaycGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cGMP-mediated signalingcGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP-mediated signalingcGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
cGMP-mediated signalingcGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to macrophage colony-stimulating factor stimuluscGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of vascular permeabilitycGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of vascular permeabilitycGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cAMP-mediated signalingcGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
cGMP catabolic processcGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of inflammatory responsecGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
establishment of endothelial barriercGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to mechanical stimuluscGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to cAMPcGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to cGMPcGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to transforming growth factor beta stimuluscGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of adenylate cyclase-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwaycGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzodioxinecGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressioncGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cGMP-mediated signalingcGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cAMP-mediated signalingcGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of mitochondrion organizationcGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin secretionMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cilium assemblyMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet degranulationMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cAMP transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
export across plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
visual perceptionRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit deltaHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP catabolic processHigh affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8AHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionHigh affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8AHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascadeHigh affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8AHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to epidermal growth factor stimulusHigh affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8AHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP-mediated signalingHigh affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8AHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cardiac muscle hypertrophycGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of nitric oxide mediated signal transductioncGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
T cell proliferationcGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of T cell proliferationcGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
cGMP catabolic processcGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
oocyte developmentcGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cardiac muscle contractioncGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
relaxation of cardiac musclecGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of oocyte developmentcGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP-mediated signalingcGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
signal transductionHigh affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9AHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cardiac muscle hypertrophyHigh affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9AHomo sapiens (human)
cGMP metabolic processHigh affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9AHomo sapiens (human)
cGMP catabolic processHigh affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9AHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of long-term synaptic potentiationHigh affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9AHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of neural precursor cell proliferationHigh affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9AHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP-mediated signalingHigh affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9AHomo sapiens (human)
behavioral fear responseHigh affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8BHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP catabolic processHigh affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8BHomo sapiens (human)
visual learningHigh affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8BHomo sapiens (human)
operant conditioningHigh affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8BHomo sapiens (human)
neuromuscular process controlling balanceHigh affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8BHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of insulin secretion involved in cellular response to glucose stimulusHigh affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8BHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of steroid hormone biosynthetic processHigh affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8BHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP-mediated signalingHigh affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascadeHigh affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8BHomo sapiens (human)
fatty acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid biosynthetic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to oxidative stressBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to organic cyclic compoundBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
protein ubiquitinationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of fatty acid beta-oxidationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid signaling pathwayBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cholesterol homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to estrogenBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
lipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of bile acid secretionBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STATInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STATInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of autophagyInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine-mediated signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
natural killer cell activationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-serine phosphorylation of STAT proteinInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to interferon-betaInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell proliferationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of viral genome replicationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
innate immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of innate immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of MHC class I biosynthetic processInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of T cell differentiationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
defense response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
type I interferon-mediated signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
neuron cellular homeostasisInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of Lewy body formationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of T-helper 2 cell cytokine productionInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell differentiationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
natural killer cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
adaptive immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
T cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
humoral immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of T cell mediated cytotoxicityHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
adaptive immune responseHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
antigen processing and presentation of endogenous peptide antigen via MHC class I via ER pathway, TAP-independentHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of T cell anergyHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
defense responseHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
immune responseHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
detection of bacteriumHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of interleukin-12 productionHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of interleukin-6 productionHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
protection from natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicityHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
innate immune responseHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of dendritic cell differentiationHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
antigen processing and presentation of endogenous peptide antigen via MHC class IbHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
visual perceptionRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaBos taurus (cattle)
visual perceptionRod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit alphaBos taurus (cattle)
cholesterol biosynthetic processCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
vesicle docking involved in exocytosisCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
bicarbonate transportCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
cholesterol transportCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
response to endoplasmic reticulum stressCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
transepithelial water transportCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of insulin secretion involved in cellular response to glucose stimulusCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of exocytosisCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
sperm capacitationCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
multicellular organismal-level water homeostasisCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular pH elevationCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
establishment of localization in cellCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
membrane hyperpolarizationCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of enamel mineralizationCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to cAMPCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
amelogenesisCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel activityCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
chloride transmembrane transportCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of voltage-gated chloride channel activityCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to forskolinCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
epithelial cell maturationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
sensory perception of soundPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
male gonad developmentPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
vestibular nucleus developmentPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
secretory granule organizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of ventricular cardiac muscle cell membrane repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to cAMPPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to acidic pHPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to light stimulusPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle cell action potential involved in contractionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle cell contractionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by cardiac conductionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of protein targeting to membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion export across plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of delayed rectifier potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of delayed rectifier potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
visual perceptionRod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
retina development in camera-type eyeRod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP-mediated signalingRod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
visual perceptionRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of MAPK cascadeRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathwayRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaHomo sapiens (human)
visual perceptionRetinal cone rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaBos taurus (cattle)
visual perceptionRod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit betaBos taurus (cattle)
entrainment of circadian clock by photoperiodRod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit betaBos taurus (cattle)
cAMP catabolic processcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4AHomo sapiens (human)
signal transductioncAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4AHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwaycAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4AHomo sapiens (human)
sensory perception of smellcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4AHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of protein kinase A signalingcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4AHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to xenobiotic stimuluscAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4AHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of adenylate cyclase-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwaycAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4AHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP-mediated signalingcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4AHomo sapiens (human)
visual perceptionRod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit betaHomo sapiens (human)
phototransduction, visible lightRod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit betaHomo sapiens (human)
entrainment of circadian clock by photoperiodRod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit betaHomo sapiens (human)
retinal cell apoptotic processRod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit betaHomo sapiens (human)
retina development in camera-type eyeRod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit betaHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP-mediated signalingRod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit betaHomo sapiens (human)
phototransduction, visible lightCone cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit alpha'Homo sapiens (human)
retinal cone cell developmentCone cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit alpha'Homo sapiens (human)
cAMP-mediated signalingCone cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit alpha'Homo sapiens (human)
visual perceptionCone cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit alpha'Homo sapiens (human)
gastrin-induced gastric acid secretionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
glucose metabolic processPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
heart developmentPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
sensory perception of soundPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
rhythmic behaviorPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart contractionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of blood pressurePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of heart ratePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
iodide transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
erythrocyte differentiationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular chloride ion homeostasisPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
response to insulinPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
social behaviorPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
corticosterone secretionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
inner ear morphogenesisPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
inner ear developmentPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
intestinal absorptionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
detection of mechanical stimulus involved in sensory perception of soundPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion homeostasisPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle contractionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
auditory receptor cell developmentPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of membrane repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of ventricular cardiac muscle cell membrane repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of atrial cardiac muscle cell membrane repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cardiac muscle contractionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of gastric acid secretionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
stomach developmentPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
renal absorptionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
renal sodium ion absorptionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to cAMPPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to xenobiotic stimulusPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to epinephrine stimulusPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
adrenergic receptor signaling pathwayPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle cell contractionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
atrial cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by cardiac conductionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
cochlea developmentPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion export across plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during atrial cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
non-motile cilium assemblyPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion import across plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of smooth muscle cell apoptotic processCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1AHomo sapiens (human)
cGMP catabolic processCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1AHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of smooth muscle cell proliferationCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1AHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP-mediated signalingCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1AHomo sapiens (human)
response to amphetamineCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1BHomo sapiens (human)
locomotory behaviorCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1BHomo sapiens (human)
visual learningCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1BHomo sapiens (human)
monocyte differentiationCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1BHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to macrophage colony-stimulating factor stimulusCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1BHomo sapiens (human)
dopamine catabolic processCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1BHomo sapiens (human)
serotonin metabolic processCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1BHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor stimulusCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1BHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP-mediated signalingCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1BHomo sapiens (human)
neutrophil homeostasiscAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP catabolic processcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
neutrophil chemotaxiscAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of type II interferon productioncAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of interleukin-2 productioncAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
T cell receptor signaling pathwaycAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
leukocyte migrationcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to lipopolysaccharidecAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to xenobiotic stimuluscAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to epinephrine stimuluscAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of adenylate cyclase-activating adrenergic receptor signaling pathwaycAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cardiac muscle cell contractioncAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of relaxation of cardiac musclecAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of calcium ion transmembrane transport via high voltage-gated calcium channelcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP-mediated signalingcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP catabolic processcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4CHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP-mediated signalingcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4CHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart ratecAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP catabolic processcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of heart ratecAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of release of sequestered calcium ion into cytosol by sarcoplasmic reticulumcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of type II interferon productioncAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of interleukin-2 productioncAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of interleukin-5 productioncAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of peptidyl-serine phosphorylationcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of heart contractioncAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
T cell receptor signaling pathwaycAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
establishment of endothelial barriercAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
adrenergic receptor signaling pathwaycAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cardiac muscle cell contractioncAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of adenylate cyclase-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwaycAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell communication by electrical coupling involved in cardiac conductioncAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of relaxation of cardiac musclecAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of calcium ion transmembrane transport via high voltage-gated calcium channelcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP-mediated signalingcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by cardiac conductionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by hormonePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of membrane potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion homeostasisPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle contractionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of membrane repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of ventricular cardiac muscle cell membrane repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to xenobiotic stimulusPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by cardiac conductionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion export across plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of potassium ion export across plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion import across plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
angiogenesiscGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase BHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell adhesioncGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase BHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwaycGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase BHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of angiogenesiscGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase BHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to insulin stimuluscGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase BHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell adhesion mediated by integrincGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase BHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of lipid catabolic processcGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase BHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of adenylate cyclase-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwaycGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase BHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP-mediated signalingcGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase BHomo sapiens (human)
immune system developmentVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cytosolic calcium ion concentrationVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
heart developmentVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cardiac muscle contraction by regulation of the release of sequestered calcium ionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
embryonic forelimb morphogenesisVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
camera-type eye developmentVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of adenylate cyclase activityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of muscle contractionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
calcium ion transport into cytosolVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
cardiac conductionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
calcium ion transmembrane transport via high voltage-gated calcium channelVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
calcium ion transmembrane transportVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle cell action potential involved in contractionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during cardiac muscle cell action potentialVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during AV node cell action potentialVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
cell communication by electrical coupling involved in cardiac conductionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by cardiac conductionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potentialVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during atrial cardiac muscle cell action potentialVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
calcium ion import across plasma membraneVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP catabolic processHigh affinity cAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 7AHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP-mediated signalingHigh affinity cAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 7AHomo sapiens (human)
visual perceptionRetinal cone rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of MAPK cascadeRetinal cone rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayRetinal cone rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathwayRetinal cone rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP-mediated signalingCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1CHomo sapiens (human)
oocyte maturationcGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase AHomo sapiens (human)
lipid metabolic processcGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase AHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwaycGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase AHomo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimuluscGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase AHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP-mediated signalingcGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase AHomo sapiens (human)
cGMP-mediated signalingcGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase AHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of meiotic nuclear divisioncGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase AHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic processcGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase AHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of vascular permeabilitycGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase AHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of vascular permeabilitycGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase AHomo sapiens (human)
steroid hormone mediated signaling pathwaycGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase AHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cAMP-mediated signalingcGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase AHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of oocyte developmentcGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase AHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of ribonuclease activitycGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase AHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to cGMPcGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase AHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to transforming growth factor beta stimuluscGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase AHomo sapiens (human)
apoptotic signaling pathwaycGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase AHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of adenylate cyclase-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwaycGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase AHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rateSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cardiac conduction system developmentSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cardiac ventricle developmentSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
brainstem developmentSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
sodium ion transportSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of sodium ion transportSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
response to denervation involved in regulation of muscle adaptationSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
telencephalon developmentSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cerebellum developmentSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
sodium ion transmembrane transportSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
odontogenesis of dentin-containing toothSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of epithelial cell proliferationSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarizationSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle contractionSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of ventricular cardiac muscle cell membrane repolarizationSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of atrial cardiac muscle cell membrane depolarizationSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of atrial cardiac muscle cell membrane repolarizationSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of ventricular cardiac muscle cell membrane depolarizationSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to calcium ionSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle cell action potential involved in contractionSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cardiac muscle cell contractionSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during cardiac muscle cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
atrial cardiac muscle cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
SA node cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
AV node cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
bundle of His cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during AV node cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during SA node cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during Purkinje myocyte cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during bundle of His cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
AV node cell to bundle of His cell communicationSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by cardiac conductionSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during atrial cardiac muscle cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of sodium ion transmembrane transportSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cGMP catabolic processcGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseBos taurus (cattle)
inositol phosphate metabolic processInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylinositol phosphate biosynthetic processInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cold-induced thermogenesisInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol phosphate biosynthetic processInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
heme catabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transepithelial transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
visual perceptionRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit deltaBos taurus (cattle)
signal transductionDual 3',5'-cyclic-AMP and -GMP phosphodiesterase 11AHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cGMP-mediated signalingDual 3',5'-cyclic-AMP and -GMP phosphodiesterase 11AHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cAMP-mediated signalingDual 3',5'-cyclic-AMP and -GMP phosphodiesterase 11AHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP-mediated signalingDual 3',5'-cyclic-AMP and -GMP phosphodiesterase 11AHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP catabolic processcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 7BHomo sapiens (human)
signal transductioncAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 7BHomo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmissioncAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 7BHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP-mediated signalingcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 7BHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP catabolic processcAMP and cAMP-inhibited cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 10AHomo sapiens (human)
cGMP catabolic processcAMP and cAMP-inhibited cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 10AHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cGMP-mediated signalingcAMP and cAMP-inhibited cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 10AHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP-mediated signalingcAMP and cAMP-inhibited cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 10AHomo sapiens (human)
angiogenesisNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
behavioral fear responseNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neuroblast proliferationNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
aggressive behaviorNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
apoptotic processNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
nervous system developmentNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
neuroblast proliferationNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
visual perceptionNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
dentate gyrus developmentNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
amygdala developmentNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
olfactory bulb developmentNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
layer formation in cerebral cortexNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
forebrain generation of neuronsNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
cerebral cortex neuron differentiationNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
anterior commissure morphogenesisNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular matrix organizationNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular receptor signaling pathwayNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
somatic stem cell population maintenanceNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
social behaviorNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic processNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
steroid hormone mediated signaling pathwayNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
astrocyte cell migrationNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell fate commitmentNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of neuron differentiationNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of angiogenesisNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell cycleNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IINuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
astrocyte differentiationNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of astrocyte differentiationNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of dendrite morphogenesisNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
retina development in camera-type eyeNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of timing of neuron differentiationNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
long-term synaptic potentiationNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell migration involved in sprouting angiogenesisNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of neural precursor cell proliferationNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of stem cell proliferationNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
anatomical structure developmentNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IINuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell differentiationNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (127)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
metal ion bindingPhosphodiesterase Bos taurus (cattle)
magnesium ion bindingcGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-AMP phosphodiesterase activitycGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
cGMP-stimulated cyclic-nucleotide phosphodiesterase activitycGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingcGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingcGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP bindingcGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
cGMP bindingcGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
TPR domain bindingcGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
phosphate ion bindingcGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
protein homodimerization activitycGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase activitycGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
icosanoid transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
purine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
efflux transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (NAD+) activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
GTPase inhibitor activityRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit deltaHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit deltaHomo sapiens (human)
small GTPase bindingRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit deltaHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-AMP phosphodiesterase activityHigh affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8AHomo sapiens (human)
kinase bindingHigh affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8AHomo sapiens (human)
protein kinase activator activityHigh affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8AHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingHigh affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8AHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase activityHigh affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8AHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-nucleotide phosphodiesterase activitycGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingcGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
cGMP bindingcGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingcGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase activitycGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-AMP phosphodiesterase activitycGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-nucleotide phosphodiesterase activityHigh affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9AHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingHigh affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9AHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingHigh affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9AHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase activityHigh affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9AHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-AMP phosphodiesterase activityHigh affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9AHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-AMP phosphodiesterase activityHigh affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8BHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingHigh affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8BHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase activityHigh affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8BHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine activityInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine receptor bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
type I interferon receptor bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
chloramphenicol O-acetyltransferase activityInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
TAP bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
signaling receptor bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
peptide antigen bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
TAP bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
protein-folding chaperone bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaBos taurus (cattle)
cGMP bindingRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaBos taurus (cattle)
3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase activityRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaBos taurus (cattle)
molecular adaptor activityRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaBos taurus (cattle)
metal ion bindingRod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit alphaBos taurus (cattle)
chloride channel activityCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
intracellularly ATP-gated chloride channel activityCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
bicarbonate transmembrane transporter activityCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
chloride transmembrane transporter activityCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
isomerase activityCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
chloride channel regulator activityCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
chloride channel inhibitor activityCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
PDZ domain bindingCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
protein-folding chaperone bindingCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
Sec61 translocon complex bindingCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
calmodulin-activated dual specificity 3',5'-cyclic-GMP, 3',5'-cyclic-AMP phosphodiesterase activityCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1A Bos taurus (cattle)
protein bindingCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1A Bos taurus (cattle)
calmodulin bindingCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1A Bos taurus (cattle)
metal ion bindingCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1A Bos taurus (cattle)
3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase activityCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1A Bos taurus (cattle)
calmodulin-activated 3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase activityCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1A Bos taurus (cattle)
voltage-gated potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
delayed rectifier potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activity involved in cardiac muscle cell action potential repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activity involved in ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potential repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
delayed rectifier potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
potassium channel regulator activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
telethonin bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complex bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transporter bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingRod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-AMP phosphodiesterase activityRod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase activityRod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cGMP bindingCone cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit alpha'Bos taurus (cattle)
metal ion bindingCone cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit alpha'Bos taurus (cattle)
enzyme inhibitor activityRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaHomo sapiens (human)
spectrin bindingRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaHomo sapiens (human)
cGMP bindingRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase activityRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaHomo sapiens (human)
cGMP bindingRetinal cone rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaBos taurus (cattle)
3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase activityRetinal cone rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaBos taurus (cattle)
metal ion bindingRod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit betaBos taurus (cattle)
3',5'-cyclic-AMP phosphodiesterase activitycAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4AHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4AHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP bindingcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4AHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4AHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase activitycAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4AHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingRod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit betaHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase activityRod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit betaHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-AMP phosphodiesterase activityRod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit betaHomo sapiens (human)
cGMP bindingCone cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit alpha'Homo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingCone cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit alpha'Homo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-AMP phosphodiesterase activityCone cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit alpha'Homo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase activityCone cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit alpha'Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
delayed rectifier potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
delayed rectifier potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
calmodulin bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein phosphatase 1 bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
outward rectifier potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein kinase A catalytic subunit bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein kinase A regulatory subunit bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transporter bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activity involved in cardiac muscle cell action potential repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activity involved in atrial cardiac muscle cell action potential repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
scaffold protein bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activity involved in ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potential repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
calmodulin-activated dual specificity 3',5'-cyclic-GMP, 3',5'-cyclic-AMP phosphodiesterase activityCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1AHomo sapiens (human)
calmodulin bindingCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1AHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1AHomo sapiens (human)
calmodulin-activated 3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase activityCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1AHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-AMP phosphodiesterase activityCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1BBos taurus (cattle)
calmodulin-activated dual specificity 3',5'-cyclic-GMP, 3',5'-cyclic-AMP phosphodiesterase activityCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1BBos taurus (cattle)
calmodulin bindingCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1BBos taurus (cattle)
metal ion bindingCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1BBos taurus (cattle)
3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase activityCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1BBos taurus (cattle)
calmodulin-activated 3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase activityCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1BBos taurus (cattle)
3',5'-cyclic-AMP phosphodiesterase activityCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1BHomo sapiens (human)
calmodulin-activated dual specificity 3',5'-cyclic-GMP, 3',5'-cyclic-AMP phosphodiesterase activityCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1BHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1BHomo sapiens (human)
calmodulin bindingCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1BHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1BHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase activityCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1BHomo sapiens (human)
calmodulin-activated 3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase activityCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1BHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-AMP phosphodiesterase activitycAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
calcium channel regulator activitycAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP bindingcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
gamma-tubulin bindingcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transporter bindingcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase activitycAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-AMP phosphodiesterase activitycAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4CHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4CHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase activitycAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4CHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-nucleotide phosphodiesterase activitycAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-AMP phosphodiesterase activitycAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
calcium channel regulator activitycAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
signaling receptor regulator activitycAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP bindingcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
beta-2 adrenergic receptor bindingcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transporter bindingcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
ATPase bindingcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
scaffold protein bindingcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
heterocyclic compound bindingcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase activitycAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
transcription cis-regulatory region bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
inward rectifier potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
delayed rectifier potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein homodimerization activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
C3HC4-type RING finger domain bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activity involved in cardiac muscle cell action potential repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
scaffold protein bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activity involved in ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potential repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-nucleotide phosphodiesterase activitycGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase BHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-AMP phosphodiesterase activitycGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase BHomo sapiens (human)
cGMP-inhibited cyclic-nucleotide phosphodiesterase activitycGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase BHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingcGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase BHomo sapiens (human)
protein kinase B bindingcGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase BHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingcGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase BHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase activitycGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase BHomo sapiens (human)
high voltage-gated calcium channel activityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel activity involved in cardiac muscle cell action potentialVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel activityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
calmodulin bindingVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
high voltage-gated calcium channel activityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
alpha-actinin bindingVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel activity involved in cardiac muscle cell action potentialVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel activity involved in AV node cell action potentialVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-AMP phosphodiesterase activityHigh affinity cAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 7AHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingHigh affinity cAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 7AHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase activityHigh affinity cAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 7AHomo sapiens (human)
enzyme inhibitor activityRetinal cone rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingRetinal cone rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaHomo sapiens (human)
cGMP bindingRetinal cone rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase activityRetinal cone rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-AMP phosphodiesterase activityCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1CHomo sapiens (human)
calmodulin-activated dual specificity 3',5'-cyclic-GMP, 3',5'-cyclic-AMP phosphodiesterase activityCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1CHomo sapiens (human)
calmodulin bindingCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1CHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1CHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase activityCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1CHomo sapiens (human)
calmodulin-activated 3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase activityCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1CHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-nucleotide phosphodiesterase activitycGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase AHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-AMP phosphodiesterase activitycGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase AHomo sapiens (human)
cGMP-inhibited cyclic-nucleotide phosphodiesterase activitycGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase AHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingcGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase AHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear estrogen receptor activitycGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase AHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingcGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase AHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase activitycGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase AHomo sapiens (human)
estrogen bindingcGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase AHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated sodium channel activitySodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
calmodulin bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
fibroblast growth factor bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
protein kinase bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
protein domain specific bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
ankyrin bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transporter bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
nitric-oxide synthase bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated sodium channel activity involved in cardiac muscle cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated sodium channel activity involved in AV node cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated sodium channel activity involved in bundle of His cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated sodium channel activity involved in Purkinje myocyte action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated sodium channel activity involved in SA node cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
scaffold protein bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cyclic-nucleotide phosphodiesterase activitycGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseBos taurus (cattle)
cGMP bindingcGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseBos taurus (cattle)
metal ion bindingcGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseBos taurus (cattle)
3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase activitycGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseBos taurus (cattle)
inositol-1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol hexakisphosphate kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol heptakisphosphate kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol hexakisphosphate 5-kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol hexakisphosphate 1-kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol hexakisphosphate 3-kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol 5-diphosphate pentakisphosphate 5-kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol diphosphate tetrakisphosphate kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
GTPase inhibitor activityRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit deltaBos taurus (cattle)
cyclic-nucleotide phosphodiesterase activityDual 3',5'-cyclic-AMP and -GMP phosphodiesterase 11AHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-nucleotide phosphodiesterase activityDual 3',5'-cyclic-AMP and -GMP phosphodiesterase 11AHomo sapiens (human)
cGMP-stimulated cyclic-nucleotide phosphodiesterase activityDual 3',5'-cyclic-AMP and -GMP phosphodiesterase 11AHomo sapiens (human)
cGMP bindingDual 3',5'-cyclic-AMP and -GMP phosphodiesterase 11AHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingDual 3',5'-cyclic-AMP and -GMP phosphodiesterase 11AHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase activityDual 3',5'-cyclic-AMP and -GMP phosphodiesterase 11AHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-AMP phosphodiesterase activityDual 3',5'-cyclic-AMP and -GMP phosphodiesterase 11AHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-AMP phosphodiesterase activitycAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 7BHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 7BHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase activitycAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 7BHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-nucleotide phosphodiesterase activitycAMP and cAMP-inhibited cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 10AHomo sapiens (human)
cGMP-stimulated cyclic-nucleotide phosphodiesterase activitycAMP and cAMP-inhibited cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 10AHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP bindingcAMP and cAMP-inhibited cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 10AHomo sapiens (human)
cGMP bindingcAMP and cAMP-inhibited cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 10AHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingcAMP and cAMP-inhibited cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 10AHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-AMP phosphodiesterase activitycAMP and cAMP-inhibited cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 10AHomo sapiens (human)
3',5'-cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase activitycAMP and cAMP-inhibited cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 10AHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription repressor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear steroid receptor activityNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase bindingNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
sequence-specific double-stranded DNA bindingNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear receptor activityNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (89)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
membranePhosphodiesterase Bos taurus (cattle)
guanyl-nucleotide exchange factor complexPhosphodiesterase Bos taurus (cattle)
plasma membranecGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
nucleuscGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmcGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial outer membranecGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial inner membranecGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumcGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatuscGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolcGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membranecGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
presynaptic membranecGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmcGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
nucleuscGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial inner membranecGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmcGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial outer membranecGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
synaptic membranecGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolcGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial matrixcGMP-dependent 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet dense granule membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
external side of apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit deltaHomo sapiens (human)
cytoskeletonRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit deltaHomo sapiens (human)
ciliumRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit deltaHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic vesicle membraneRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit deltaHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic vesicleRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit deltaHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit deltaHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolHigh affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8AHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeHigh affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8AHomo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmHigh affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8AHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolHigh affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8AHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusHigh affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8AHomo sapiens (human)
cellular_componentcGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolcGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmHigh affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9AHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumHigh affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9AHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusHigh affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9AHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolHigh affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9AHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneHigh affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9AHomo sapiens (human)
ruffle membraneHigh affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9AHomo sapiens (human)
sarcolemmaHigh affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9AHomo sapiens (human)
perikaryonHigh affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9AHomo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmHigh affinity cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 9AHomo sapiens (human)
cellular_componentHigh affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8BHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolHigh affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8BHomo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmHigh affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8BHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusHigh affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8BHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolHigh affinity cAMP-specific and IBMX-insensitive 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 8BHomo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosome membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
ER to Golgi transport vesicle membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
secretory granule membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
phagocytic vesicle membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
early endosome membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
recycling endosome membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
lumenal side of endoplasmic reticulum membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
MHC class I protein complexHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
external side of plasma membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
photoreceptor disc membraneRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaBos taurus (cattle)
photoreceptor outer segment membraneRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaBos taurus (cattle)
photoreceptor disc membraneRod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit alphaBos taurus (cattle)
photoreceptor outer segment membraneRod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit alphaBos taurus (cattle)
nucleusCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
lysosomal membraneCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
early endosomeCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
endosome membraneCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
membraneCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi-associated vesicle membraneCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
clathrin-coated endocytic vesicle membraneCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
early endosome membraneCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosomeCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosome membraneCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
chloride channel complexCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulatorHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel complexPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
lysosomePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfacePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
Z discPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
membrane raftPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneRod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
photoreceptor disc membraneRod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
photoreceptor outer segment membraneRod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCone cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit alpha'Bos taurus (cattle)
plasma membraneRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaHomo sapiens (human)
photoreceptor disc membraneRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaHomo sapiens (human)
photoreceptor outer segment membraneRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaHomo sapiens (human)
photoreceptor disc membraneRod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit betaBos taurus (cattle)
photoreceptor outer segment membraneRod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit betaBos taurus (cattle)
nucleoplasmcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4AHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4AHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membranecAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4AHomo sapiens (human)
membranecAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4AHomo sapiens (human)
ruffle membranecAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4AHomo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4AHomo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4AHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4AHomo sapiens (human)
nucleuscAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4AHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneRod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit betaHomo sapiens (human)
photoreceptor disc membraneRod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit betaHomo sapiens (human)
photoreceptor outer segment membraneRod cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit betaHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCone cGMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit alpha'Homo sapiens (human)
early endosomePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
lysosomePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
early endosomePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
late endosomePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel complexPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
transport vesiclePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic vesicle membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell bodyPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
membrane raftPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
ciliary basePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
lumenal side of membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral part of cellPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic ion channel complexPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily KQT member 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1AHomo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell bodyCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1AHomo sapiens (human)
virion membraneSpike glycoproteinSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus
cytosolCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1BBos taurus (cattle)
cytosolCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1BHomo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell bodyCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1BHomo sapiens (human)
centrosomecAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
synaptic vesiclecAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic densitycAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
Z disccAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
dendritic spinecAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
excitatory synapsecAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
gamma-tubulin complexcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel complexcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
nucleuscAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4BHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular spacecAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4CHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4CHomo sapiens (human)
ciliumcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4CHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4CHomo sapiens (human)
nucleuscAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4CHomo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4CHomo sapiens (human)
centrosomecAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membranecAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membranecAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel complexcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
calcium channel complexcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
nucleuscAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 4DHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfacePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel complexPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
inward rectifier potassium channel complexPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumcGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase BHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatuscGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase BHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolcGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase BHomo sapiens (human)
membranecGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase BHomo sapiens (human)
guanyl-nucleotide exchange factor complexcGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase BHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic densityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
membraneVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
Z discVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
dendriteVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
perikaryonVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic density membraneVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
L-type voltage-gated calcium channel complexVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel complexVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolHigh affinity cAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 7AHomo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmHigh affinity cAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 7AHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusHigh affinity cAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 7AHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolHigh affinity cAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 7AHomo sapiens (human)
photoreceptor outer segment membraneRetinal cone rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit gammaHomo sapiens (human)
lysosomeCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1CHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1CHomo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell bodyCalcium/calmodulin-dependent 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 1CHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolcGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase AHomo sapiens (human)
membranecGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase AHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolcGMP-inhibited 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase AHomo sapiens (human)
caveolaSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
nucleolusSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
caveolaSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
intercalated discSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
membraneSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
lateral plasma membraneSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
Z discSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
T-tubuleSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
sarcolemmaSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated sodium channel complexSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
fibrillar centerInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit deltaBos taurus (cattle)
cytoskeletonRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit deltaBos taurus (cattle)
cytoplasmic vesicle membraneRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit deltaBos taurus (cattle)
cytoplasmic vesicleRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit deltaBos taurus (cattle)
photoreceptor outer segment membraneRetinal rod rhodopsin-sensitive cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase subunit deltaBos taurus (cattle)
cellular_componentDual 3',5'-cyclic-AMP and -GMP phosphodiesterase 11AHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolDual 3',5'-cyclic-AMP and -GMP phosphodiesterase 11AHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 7BHomo sapiens (human)
synapsecAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 7BHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 7BHomo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmcAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 7BHomo sapiens (human)
nucleuscAMP-specific 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 7BHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolcAMP and cAMP-inhibited cGMP 3',5'-cyclic phosphodiesterase 10AHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
chromatinNuclear receptor subfamily 2 group E member 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (260)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1347101qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347089qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347097qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1508630Primary qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome: Secreted ER Calcium Modulated Protein (SERCaMP) assay2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1347095qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347105qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347102qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347154Primary screen GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347098qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347083qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: Viability assay - alamar blue signal for LASV Primary Screen2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347103qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID651635Viability Counterscreen for Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1347108qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347407qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Pharmaceutical Collection2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1347424RapidFire Mass Spectrometry qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347086qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Arenaviruses (LCMV): LCMV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347096qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347100qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347093qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347107qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347094qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1347099qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347082qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: LASV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347090qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347104qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347091qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347106qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347092qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for A673 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347425Rhodamine-PBP qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID504812Inverse Agonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID504810Antagonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID1347411qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Mechanism Interrogation Plate v5.0 (MIPE) Libary2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1384235Effective permeability of the compound at 50 uM after 18 hrs by UV spectroscopy based PAMPA2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-25, Volume: 150Design, synthesis, biological evaluation and in vivo testing of dual phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) and histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6)-selective inhibitors for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID1598435Inhibition of N-terminal GST-tagged human PDE1 expressed in baculovirus infected sf9 cells using [3H]cAMP as substrate measured after 30 mins by scintillation proximity assay2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-23, Volume: 62, Issue:10
Pharmacokinetics-Driven Optimization of 4(3 H)-Pyrimidinones as Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors Leading to TPN171, a Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
AID1555534Inhibition of PDE5A1 (unknown origin) by immobilized metal ion affinity-based fluorescence polarization2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-15, Volume: 176Multi-target design strategies for the improved treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID1421865Selectivity index, ratio of IC50 for inhibition of full length recombinant human N-terminal GST-tagged PDE11A4 expressed in baculovirus infected sf9 cells to IC50 for inhibition of full length recombinant human N-terminal GST-tagged PDE5A1 expressed in ba2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-05, Volume: 158Discovery of furyl/thienyl β-carboline derivatives as potent and selective PDE5 inhibitors with excellent vasorelaxant effect.
AID1473741Inhibition of human MRP4 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1384224Cytotoxicity against human THLE2 cells after 72 hrs by vialight cell proliferation assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-25, Volume: 150Design, synthesis, biological evaluation and in vivo testing of dual phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) and histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6)-selective inhibitors for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID1207448Inhibition of transient outward potassium current (Ito) current in Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) K1 cells expressing human Kv4.3 measured using IonWorks Quattro automated patch clamp platform
AID735472Selectivity ratio of IC50 for PDE6 (unknown origin) to IC50 for PDE5 (unknown origin)2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 60Synthesis of quinoline derivatives: discovery of a potent and selective phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID735475Selectivity ratio of IC50 for PDE1 (unknown origin) to IC50 for PDE5 (unknown origin)2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 60Synthesis of quinoline derivatives: discovery of a potent and selective phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID503318Antiproliferative activity against human PC3 cells at 1 uM after 120 hrs by MTT assay relative to DMSO2006Nature chemical biology, Jun, Volume: 2, Issue:6
Identifying off-target effects and hidden phenotypes of drugs in human cells.
AID1474167Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring verified drug-induced liver injury concern status2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID735471Selectivity ratio of IC50 for PDE8 (unknown origin) to IC50 for PDE5 (unknown origin)2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 60Synthesis of quinoline derivatives: discovery of a potent and selective phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID239083Inhibition of phosphodiesterase 5 in rat fetal lung fibroblast (RFL-6) cells2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 48, Issue:6
Pyrroloquinolone PDE5 inhibitors with improved pharmaceutical profiles for clinical studies on erectile dysfunction.
AID29943Volume of distribution of compound was determined in rats2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-09, Volume: 46, Issue:21
The discovery of tadalafil: a novel and highly selective PDE5 inhibitor. 2: 2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino[1',2':1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione analogues.
AID1421864Inhibition of recombinant human N-terminal GST-tagged PDE10A1 (2 to 789 residues) expressed in baculovirus infected sf9 cells using FAM-cyclic-3',5-AMP as substrate after 1 hr by fluorescence polarization assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-05, Volume: 158Discovery of furyl/thienyl β-carboline derivatives as potent and selective PDE5 inhibitors with excellent vasorelaxant effect.
AID1810681Agonist activity at in human TLX LBD expressed in human HEK293T cells coexpressing Gal4-VP 16 assessed as increase in reporter activity measured after 14 hrs by luciferase reporter gene assay relative to control2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-24, Volume: 64, Issue:12
Propranolol Activates the Orphan Nuclear Receptor TLX to Counteract Proliferation and Migration of Glioblastoma Cells.
AID410413Inhibition of bovine PDE52008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-01, Volume: 18, Issue:23
Quinazolines as potent and highly selective PDE5 inhibitors as potential therapeutics for male erectile dysfunction.
AID454867Inhibition of human recombinant PDE112010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-01, Volume: 20, Issue:1
Discovery of potent, selective, and orally bioavailable PDE5 inhibitor: Methyl-4-(3-chloro-4-methoxybenzylamino)-8-(2-hydroxyethyl)-7-methoxyquinazolin-6-ylmethylcarbamate (CKD 533).
AID1321729Inhibition of HDAC6 in human SH-SY5Y cells assessed as increase in alpha-tubulin acetylation at Lys 40 after 2 hrs by Western blot analysis2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-13, Volume: 59, Issue:19
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of First-in-Class Dual Acting Histone Deacetylases (HDACs) and Phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) Inhibitors for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.
AID1321733Inhibition of HDAC6 in human SH-SY5Y cells assessed as increase in alpha-tubulin acetylation at Lys 40 residue at 100 nM after 2 hrs by Western blot analysis relative to control2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-13, Volume: 59, Issue:19
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of First-in-Class Dual Acting Histone Deacetylases (HDACs) and Phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) Inhibitors for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.
AID1321734Inhibition of HDAC6 in human SH-SY5Y cells assessed as increase in alpha-tubulin acetylation at Lys 40 residue at 500 nM after 2 hrs by Western blot analysis relative to control2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-13, Volume: 59, Issue:19
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of First-in-Class Dual Acting Histone Deacetylases (HDACs) and Phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) Inhibitors for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.
AID1386237Selectivity ratio of IC50 for PDE11A catalytic domain (588 to 911 residues) (unknown origin) to IC50 for human PDE5A1 catalytic domain (535 to 860 residues)2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-27, Volume: 61, Issue:18
Optimization of Chromeno[2,3- c]pyrrol-9(2 H)-ones as Highly Potent, Selective, and Orally Bioavailable PDE5 Inhibitors: Structure-Activity Relationship, X-ray Crystal Structure, and Pharmacodynamic Effect on Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
AID305335Aqueous solubility in PBS at pH 7.42007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 17, Issue:3
PDE5 inhibitors: An original access to novel potent arylated analogues of tadalafil.
AID158123Inhibition of bovine retina PDE6 (Phosphodiesterase 6)2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-09, Volume: 46, Issue:21
The discovery of tadalafil: a novel and highly selective PDE5 inhibitor. 2: 2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino[1',2':1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione analogues.
AID1872578Inhibition of PDE6 (unknown origin)2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 232Therapeutic potential of phosphodiesterase inhibitors for cognitive amelioration in Alzheimer's disease.
AID1872577Inhibition of PDE5 (unknown origin)2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 232Therapeutic potential of phosphodiesterase inhibitors for cognitive amelioration in Alzheimer's disease.
AID735483Inhibition of PDE6 (unknown origin) using FAM-cGMP as substrate after 60 mins by fluorescence assay2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 60Synthesis of quinoline derivatives: discovery of a potent and selective phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID454866Inhibition of bovine retina PDE62010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-01, Volume: 20, Issue:1
Discovery of potent, selective, and orally bioavailable PDE5 inhibitor: Methyl-4-(3-chloro-4-methoxybenzylamino)-8-(2-hydroxyethyl)-7-methoxyquinazolin-6-ylmethylcarbamate (CKD 533).
AID477861Growth inhibition of human HT-29 cells after 72 hrs by cell titer glo assay2010European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr, Volume: 45, Issue:4
Synthesis, molecular modeling and biological evaluation of novel tadalafil analogues as phosphodiesterase 5 and colon tumor cell growth inhibitors, new stereochemical perspective.
AID1207482Inhibition of rapid delayed inward rectifying potassium current (IKr) in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) K1 cells stably expressing hERG measured using IonWorks Quattro automated patch clamp platform
AID1421860Inhibition of full length recombinant human N-terminal GST-tagged PDE11A4 expressed in baculovirus infected sf9 cells using FAM-cyclic-3',5-AMP as substrate after 1 hr by fluorescence polarization assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-05, Volume: 158Discovery of furyl/thienyl β-carboline derivatives as potent and selective PDE5 inhibitors with excellent vasorelaxant effect.
AID240959Inhibition of human phosphodiesterase 32005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-02, Volume: 15, Issue:9
Optimization of purine based PDE1/PDE5 inhibitors to a potent and selective PDE5 inhibitor for the treatment of male ED.
AID158753Inhibition of bovine aorta PDE1 (Phosphodiesterase 1)2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-09, Volume: 46, Issue:21
The discovery of tadalafil: a novel and highly selective PDE5 inhibitor. 2: 2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino[1',2':1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione analogues.
AID735478Inhibition of PDE11 (unknown origin) using FAM-cGMP and FAM-cAMP as substrate after 60 mins by fluorescence assay2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 60Synthesis of quinoline derivatives: discovery of a potent and selective phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID229980Relative inhibition of bovine aorta PDE5 and bovine retina PDE62003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-09, Volume: 46, Issue:21
The discovery of tadalafil: a novel and highly selective PDE5 inhibitor. 2: 2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino[1',2':1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione analogues.
AID244234Ratio of inhibitory constant against phosphodiesterase 2 and phosphodiesterase 5 in rat fetal lung fibroblast (RFL-6) cells2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 48, Issue:6
Pyrroloquinolone PDE5 inhibitors with improved pharmaceutical profiles for clinical studies on erectile dysfunction.
AID240958Inhibition of human phosphodiesterase 22005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-02, Volume: 15, Issue:9
Optimization of purine based PDE1/PDE5 inhibitors to a potent and selective PDE5 inhibitor for the treatment of male ED.
AID1598437Inhibition of N-terminal GST-tagged human PDE3 expressed in baculovirus infected sf9 cells using [3H]cAMP as substrate measured after 30 mins by scintillation proximity assay2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-23, Volume: 62, Issue:10
Pharmacokinetics-Driven Optimization of 4(3 H)-Pyrimidinones as Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors Leading to TPN171, a Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
AID1380124Inhibition of PDE5A (unknown origin)2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-12, Volume: 61, Issue:13
Novel Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors for Cognitive Improvement in Alzheimer's Disease.
AID1384225Inhibition of HDAC6 in human SH-SY5Y cells assessed as induction of tubulin K-40 acetylation level at 500 nM after 2 hrs by Western blot analysis relative to control2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-25, Volume: 150Design, synthesis, biological evaluation and in vivo testing of dual phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) and histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6)-selective inhibitors for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID1421855Inhibition of recombinant human N-terminal FLAG-tagged PDE2A (2 to 941 residues) expressed in baculovirus infected sf9 cells using FAM-cyclic-3',5-AMP as substrate after 1 hr by fluorescence polarization assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-05, Volume: 158Discovery of furyl/thienyl β-carboline derivatives as potent and selective PDE5 inhibitors with excellent vasorelaxant effect.
AID655406Inhibition of Trypanosoma brucei PDEB1 using cAMP as substrate at 100 uM preincubated for 10 mins prior substrate addition by spectrophotometry2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 22, Issue:7
Synthesis and evaluation of human phosphodiesterases (PDE) 5 inhibitor analogs as trypanosomal PDE inhibitors. Part 2. Tadalafil analogs.
AID1810682Agonist activity at in human TLX LBD expressed in human HEK293T cells coexpressing Gal4-VP 16 assessed as remaining activity measured after 14 hrs by luciferase reporter gene assay relative to control2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-24, Volume: 64, Issue:12
Propranolol Activates the Orphan Nuclear Receptor TLX to Counteract Proliferation and Migration of Glioblastoma Cells.
AID1872580Drug concentration in C57B6 mouse brain at 15 mg/kg, po via gavage measured after 90 mins by HPLC-MS analysis2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 232Therapeutic potential of phosphodiesterase inhibitors for cognitive amelioration in Alzheimer's disease.
AID566808Selectivity ratio of IC50 for human recombinant PDE11A-mediated hydrolysis of cGMP to IC50 for human recombinant PDE5A-mediated hydrolysis of cGMP2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Synthesis and molecular modeling of novel tetrahydro-β-carboline derivatives with phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitory and anticancer properties.
AID625284Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic failure2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID477863Inhibition of human recombinant PDE5 after 1.5 hrs by fluorescent polarization assay2010European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr, Volume: 45, Issue:4
Synthesis, molecular modeling and biological evaluation of novel tadalafil analogues as phosphodiesterase 5 and colon tumor cell growth inhibitors, new stereochemical perspective.
AID1872579Permeability of compound in BBB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 232Therapeutic potential of phosphodiesterase inhibitors for cognitive amelioration in Alzheimer's disease.
AID1659411Inhibition of PDE5A (unknown origin)2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 05-01, Volume: 30, Issue:9
Novel PDE5 inhibitors derived from rutaecarpine for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID1421856Inhibition of recombinant human N-terminal GST-tagged PDE3B (592 to end residues) expressed in baculovirus infected sf9 cells using FAM-cyclic-3',5-AMP as substrate after 1 hr by fluorescence polarization assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-05, Volume: 158Discovery of furyl/thienyl β-carboline derivatives as potent and selective PDE5 inhibitors with excellent vasorelaxant effect.
AID175661Effective concentration against rat aortic smooth muscle cell2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-09, Volume: 46, Issue:21
The discovery of tadalafil: a novel and highly selective PDE5 inhibitor. 2: 2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino[1',2':1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione analogues.
AID566802Inhibition of human recombinant PDE5A-mediated hydrolysis of cGMP after 30 mins by fluorescence polarization assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Synthesis and molecular modeling of novel tetrahydro-β-carboline derivatives with phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitory and anticancer properties.
AID625285Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic necrosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1555532Inhibition of AChE from rat cortex by Ellman's method2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-15, Volume: 176Multi-target design strategies for the improved treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID240763Inhibition of human phosphodiesterase 62005Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-19, Volume: 48, Issue:10
The next generation of phosphodiesterase inhibitors: structural clues to ligand and substrate selectivity of phosphodiesterases.
AID1222793Dissociation constant, pKa of the compound2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, May, Volume: 41, Issue:5
Which metabolites circulate?
AID1598441Inhibition of N-terminal GST-tagged full length human PDE8A1 expressed in baculovirus infected sf9 cells using [3H]cAMP as substrate measured after 30 mins by scintillation proximity assay2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-23, Volume: 62, Issue:10
Pharmacokinetics-Driven Optimization of 4(3 H)-Pyrimidinones as Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors Leading to TPN171, a Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
AID1473740Inhibition of human MRP3 overexpressed in Sf9 insect cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 10 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1598427Inhibition of N-terminal GST-tagged human PDE5A1 expressed in baculovirus infected sf9 cells using [3H]cGMP as substrate measured after 30 mins by scintillation proximity assay2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-23, Volume: 62, Issue:10
Pharmacokinetics-Driven Optimization of 4(3 H)-Pyrimidinones as Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors Leading to TPN171, a Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
AID240963Inhibition of human phosphodiesterase 72005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-02, Volume: 15, Issue:9
Optimization of purine based PDE1/PDE5 inhibitors to a potent and selective PDE5 inhibitor for the treatment of male ED.
AID1321738Inhibition of PDE5A in human SH-SY5Y cells assessed as increase in CREB phosphorylation at Ser133 residue at 500 nM after 30 mins by Western blot analysis relative to control2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-13, Volume: 59, Issue:19
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of First-in-Class Dual Acting Histone Deacetylases (HDACs) and Phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) Inhibitors for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.
AID1750322Inhibition of PDE5A in HEK293 cells stably transfected with cGMP biosensor assessed as increase in SNP-induced intracellular cGMP level measured after 90 mins by luminescence assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 04-22, Volume: 64, Issue:8
From Celecoxib to a Novel Class of Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors: Trisubstituted Pyrazolines as Novel Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors with Extremely High Potency and Phosphodiesterase Isozyme Selectivity.
AID625289Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver disease2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID735473Selectivity ratio of IC50 for PDE4 (unknown origin) to IC50 for PDE5 (unknown origin)2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 60Synthesis of quinoline derivatives: discovery of a potent and selective phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID1321731Inhibition of class 1 histone deacetylase in human SH-SY5Y cells assessed as increase in histone H3K9 acetylation at 500 nM after 2 hrs by Western blot analysis relative to control2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-13, Volume: 59, Issue:19
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of First-in-Class Dual Acting Histone Deacetylases (HDACs) and Phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) Inhibitors for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.
AID1598489Volume of distribution at steady state in iv dosed rat2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-23, Volume: 62, Issue:10
Pharmacokinetics-Driven Optimization of 4(3 H)-Pyrimidinones as Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors Leading to TPN171, a Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
AID1473739Inhibition of human MRP2 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID29807Oral bioavailability in rat was determined2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-09, Volume: 46, Issue:21
The discovery of tadalafil: a novel and highly selective PDE5 inhibitor. 2: 2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino[1',2':1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione analogues.
AID1384227Inhibition of HDAC6 in human SH-SY5Y cells assessed as induction of tubulin K-40 acetylation level at 100 nM after 2 hrs by Western blot analysis relative to control2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-25, Volume: 150Design, synthesis, biological evaluation and in vivo testing of dual phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) and histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6)-selective inhibitors for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID1173629Selectivity for PDE5 (unknown origin) over PDE6 (unknown origin)2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-01, Volume: 24, Issue:23
The discovery of avanafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: a novel pyrimidine-5-carboxamide derivative as a potent and highly selective phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor.
AID566806Inhibition of human recombinant PDE11A-mediated hydrolysis of cAMP after 30 mins by fluorescence polarization assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Synthesis and molecular modeling of novel tetrahydro-β-carboline derivatives with phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitory and anticancer properties.
AID1598444Inhibition of N-terminal GST-tagged human PDE11A4 expressed in baculovirus infected sf9 cells using [3H]cGMP as substrate measured after 30 mins by scintillation proximity assay2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-23, Volume: 62, Issue:10
Pharmacokinetics-Driven Optimization of 4(3 H)-Pyrimidinones as Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors Leading to TPN171, a Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
AID1598488Clearance in iv dosed rat2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-23, Volume: 62, Issue:10
Pharmacokinetics-Driven Optimization of 4(3 H)-Pyrimidinones as Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors Leading to TPN171, a Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
AID237680Half-life was observed2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-02, Volume: 15, Issue:9
New pyrazolo[1',5':1,6]pyrimido[4,5-d]pyridazin-4(3H)-ones as potent and selective PDE5 inhibitors.
AID1598438Inhibition of N-terminal GST-tagged human PDE4 expressed in baculovirus infected sf9 cells using [3H]cAMP as substrate measured after 30 mins by scintillation proximity assay2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-23, Volume: 62, Issue:10
Pharmacokinetics-Driven Optimization of 4(3 H)-Pyrimidinones as Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors Leading to TPN171, a Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
AID1598443Inhibition of N-terminal GST-tagged human PDE10A expressed in baculovirus infected sf9 cells using [3H]cAMP as substrate measured after 30 mins by scintillation proximity assay2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-23, Volume: 62, Issue:10
Pharmacokinetics-Driven Optimization of 4(3 H)-Pyrimidinones as Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors Leading to TPN171, a Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
AID735482Inhibition of PDE7 (unknown origin) using FAM-cAMP as substrate after 60 mins by fluorescence assay2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 60Synthesis of quinoline derivatives: discovery of a potent and selective phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID238296Inhibition of human phosphodiesterase 52005Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-19, Volume: 48, Issue:10
The next generation of phosphodiesterase inhibitors: structural clues to ligand and substrate selectivity of phosphodiesterases.
AID477860Growth inhibition of human HT-29 cells at 100 uM after 72 hrs by cell titer glo assay2010European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr, Volume: 45, Issue:4
Synthesis, molecular modeling and biological evaluation of novel tadalafil analogues as phosphodiesterase 5 and colon tumor cell growth inhibitors, new stereochemical perspective.
AID735470Selectivity ratio of IC50 for PDE7 (unknown origin) to IC50 for PDE5 (unknown origin)2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 60Synthesis of quinoline derivatives: discovery of a potent and selective phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID477862Inhibition of human recombinant PDE5 at 100 uM after 1.5 hrs by fluorescent polarization assay2010European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr, Volume: 45, Issue:4
Synthesis, molecular modeling and biological evaluation of novel tadalafil analogues as phosphodiesterase 5 and colon tumor cell growth inhibitors, new stereochemical perspective.
AID240504Inhibition of Phosphodiesterase 92005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-02, Volume: 15, Issue:9
Optimization of purine based PDE1/PDE5 inhibitors to a potent and selective PDE5 inhibitor for the treatment of male ED.
AID240764Inhibitory concentration against phosphodiesterase-112005Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-19, Volume: 48, Issue:10
The next generation of phosphodiesterase inhibitors: structural clues to ligand and substrate selectivity of phosphodiesterases.
AID1321730Inhibition of class 1 histone deacetylase in human SH-SY5Y cells assessed as increase in histone H3K9 acetylation at 100 nM after 2 hrs by Western blot analysis relative to control2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-13, Volume: 59, Issue:19
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of First-in-Class Dual Acting Histone Deacetylases (HDACs) and Phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) Inhibitors for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.
AID454872Inhibition of erectile dysfunction in New Zealand white rabbit assessed as induction of SNP-potentiated penile erection at 3 mg/kg, po after 2 hrs2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-01, Volume: 20, Issue:1
Discovery of potent, selective, and orally bioavailable PDE5 inhibitor: Methyl-4-(3-chloro-4-methoxybenzylamino)-8-(2-hydroxyethyl)-7-methoxyquinazolin-6-ylmethylcarbamate (CKD 533).
AID1207328Inhibition of fast sodium current (INa) in Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) K1 cells transfected with human Nav1.5 measured using IonWorks Quattro automated patch clamp platform
AID1384230Inhibition of class-1 HDAC in human SH-SY5Y cells assessed as induction of AcH3K9 level at 500 nM after 2 hrs by Western blot analysis relative to control2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-25, Volume: 150Design, synthesis, biological evaluation and in vivo testing of dual phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) and histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6)-selective inhibitors for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID1598490Oral bioavailability in rat2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-23, Volume: 62, Issue:10
Pharmacokinetics-Driven Optimization of 4(3 H)-Pyrimidinones as Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors Leading to TPN171, a Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
AID159197Inhibition of bovine aorta PDE3 (Phosphodiesterase 3)2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-09, Volume: 46, Issue:21
The discovery of tadalafil: a novel and highly selective PDE5 inhibitor. 2: 2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino[1',2':1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione analogues.
AID566803Inhibition of human recombinant PDE3B-mediated hydrolysis of cAMP after 30 mins by fluorescence polarization assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Synthesis and molecular modeling of novel tetrahydro-β-carboline derivatives with phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitory and anticancer properties.
AID159061Inhibition of Human recombinant PDE2 (Phosphodiesterase 2)2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-09, Volume: 46, Issue:21
The discovery of tadalafil: a novel and highly selective PDE5 inhibitor. 2: 2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino[1',2':1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione analogues.
AID241009Inhibition of human phosphodiesterase 112005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-02, Volume: 15, Issue:9
Optimization of purine based PDE1/PDE5 inhibitors to a potent and selective PDE5 inhibitor for the treatment of male ED.
AID735480Inhibition of PDE10 (unknown origin) using FAM-cGMP and FAM-cAMP as substrate after 60 mins by fluorescence assay2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 60Synthesis of quinoline derivatives: discovery of a potent and selective phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID1421862Inhibition of full length recombinant human N-terminal GST-tagged PDE8A1 expressed in baculovirus infected sf9 cells using FAM-cyclic-3',5-AMP as substrate after 1 hr by fluorescence polarization assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-05, Volume: 158Discovery of furyl/thienyl β-carboline derivatives as potent and selective PDE5 inhibitors with excellent vasorelaxant effect.
AID566805Inhibition of human recombinant PDE4B-mediated hydrolysis of cAMP after 30 mins by fluorescence polarization assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Synthesis and molecular modeling of novel tetrahydro-β-carboline derivatives with phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitory and anticancer properties.
AID240964Inhibitory concentration against human phosphodiesterase 8 activity2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-02, Volume: 15, Issue:9
Optimization of purine based PDE1/PDE5 inhibitors to a potent and selective PDE5 inhibitor for the treatment of male ED.
AID1598451Selectivity ratio of IC50 for N-terminal GST-tagged human PDE9A2 to IC50 for N-terminal GST-tagged human PDE5A12019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-23, Volume: 62, Issue:10
Pharmacokinetics-Driven Optimization of 4(3 H)-Pyrimidinones as Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors Leading to TPN171, a Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
AID1321735Inhibition of HDAC6 in human SH-SY5Y cells assessed as increase in alpha-tubulin acetylation at Lys 40 residue at 1000 nM after 2 hrs by Western blot analysis relative to control2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-13, Volume: 59, Issue:19
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of First-in-Class Dual Acting Histone Deacetylases (HDACs) and Phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) Inhibitors for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.
AID411793Metabolic stability in human liver microsomes assessed as intrinsic clearance per mg of protein2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-22, Volume: 52, Issue:2
Metabolic soft spot identification and compound optimization in early discovery phases using MetaSite and LC-MS/MS validation.
AID229356Relative inhibition of PDE2 from rat kidney and PDE5 from human platelets2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-13, Volume: 46, Issue:4
Substituted pyrazolopyridopyridazines as orally bioavailable potent and selective PDE5 inhibitors: potential agents for treatment of erectile dysfunction.
AID659075Inhibition of bovine PDE5 after 24 hrs by time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer assay2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-09, Volume: 55, Issue:3
Drug-to-genome-to-drug, step 2: reversing selectivity in a series of antiplasmodial compounds.
AID1421857Inhibition of full length recombinant human N-terminal GST-tagged PDE4A1A expressed in baculovirus infected sf9 cells using FAM-cyclic-3',5-AMP as substrate after 1 hr by fluorescence polarization assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-05, Volume: 158Discovery of furyl/thienyl β-carboline derivatives as potent and selective PDE5 inhibitors with excellent vasorelaxant effect.
AID1321723Cytotoxicity against human THLE2 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability after 72 hrs by ATP Vialight assay2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-13, Volume: 59, Issue:19
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of First-in-Class Dual Acting Histone Deacetylases (HDACs) and Phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) Inhibitors for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.
AID1598446Selectivity ratio of IC50 for N-terminal GST-tagged human PDE2A1 to IC50 for N-terminal GST-tagged human PDE5A12019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-23, Volume: 62, Issue:10
Pharmacokinetics-Driven Optimization of 4(3 H)-Pyrimidinones as Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors Leading to TPN171, a Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
AID241008Inhibitory concentration against human phosphodiesterase 102005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-02, Volume: 15, Issue:9
Optimization of purine based PDE1/PDE5 inhibitors to a potent and selective PDE5 inhibitor for the treatment of male ED.
AID1421859Selectivity index, ratio of IC50 for inhibition of full length recombinant human N-terminal GST-tagged PDE6C expressed in baculovirus infected sf9 cells to IC50 for inhibition of full length recombinant human N-terminal GST-tagged PDE5A1 expressed in bacu2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-05, Volume: 158Discovery of furyl/thienyl β-carboline derivatives as potent and selective PDE5 inhibitors with excellent vasorelaxant effect.
AID240960Inhibition of human phosphodiesterase 42005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-02, Volume: 15, Issue:9
Optimization of purine based PDE1/PDE5 inhibitors to a potent and selective PDE5 inhibitor for the treatment of male ED.
AID1598442Inhibition of N-terminal GST-tagged full length human PDE9A2 expressed in baculovirus infected sf9 cells using [3H]cGMP as substrate measured after 30 mins by scintillation proximity assay2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-23, Volume: 62, Issue:10
Pharmacokinetics-Driven Optimization of 4(3 H)-Pyrimidinones as Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors Leading to TPN171, a Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
AID1761536Binding affinity to sensorchip-immobilized human His-tagged CFTR F508 deletion mutant by surface plasmon resonance analysis2021European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-05, Volume: 213In silico drug repositioning on F508del-CFTR: A proof-of-concept study on the AIFA library.
AID659072Antiplasmodial activity against chloroquine-sensitive Plasmodium falciparum GHA infected in human erythrocytes after 72 hrs using malstat staining by spectrophotometry2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-09, Volume: 55, Issue:3
Drug-to-genome-to-drug, step 2: reversing selectivity in a series of antiplasmodial compounds.
AID1598450Selectivity ratio of IC50 for N-terminal GST-tagged human PDE8A1 to IC50 for N-terminal GST-tagged human PDE5A12019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-23, Volume: 62, Issue:10
Pharmacokinetics-Driven Optimization of 4(3 H)-Pyrimidinones as Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors Leading to TPN171, a Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
AID1421861Inhibition of recombinant human N-terminal GST-tagged PDE7A (122 to end residues) expressed in baculovirus infected sf9 cells using FAM-cyclic-3',5-AMP as substrate after 1 hr by fluorescence polarization assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-05, Volume: 158Discovery of furyl/thienyl β-carboline derivatives as potent and selective PDE5 inhibitors with excellent vasorelaxant effect.
AID30201Half life in rat2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-09, Volume: 46, Issue:21
The discovery of tadalafil: a novel and highly selective PDE5 inhibitor. 2: 2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino[1',2':1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione analogues.
AID1384229Inhibition of class-1 HDAC in human SH-SY5Y cells assessed as induction of AcH3K9 level at 100 nM after 2 hrs by Western blot analysis relative to control2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-25, Volume: 150Design, synthesis, biological evaluation and in vivo testing of dual phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) and histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6)-selective inhibitors for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID1321699Inhibition of recombinant human PDE5A2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-13, Volume: 59, Issue:19
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of First-in-Class Dual Acting Histone Deacetylases (HDACs) and Phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) Inhibitors for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.
AID240957Inhibition of human phosphodiesterase 12005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-02, Volume: 15, Issue:9
Optimization of purine based PDE1/PDE5 inhibitors to a potent and selective PDE5 inhibitor for the treatment of male ED.
AID1598453Selectivity ratio of IC50 for N-terminal GST-tagged human PDE11A4 to IC50 for N-terminal GST-tagged human PDE5A12019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-23, Volume: 62, Issue:10
Pharmacokinetics-Driven Optimization of 4(3 H)-Pyrimidinones as Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors Leading to TPN171, a Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
AID1421854Inhibition of full length recombinant human N-terminal GST-tagged PDE1A expressed in baculovirus infected sf9 cells using FAM-cyclic-3',5-AMP as substrate after 1 hr by fluorescence polarization assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-05, Volume: 158Discovery of furyl/thienyl β-carboline derivatives as potent and selective PDE5 inhibitors with excellent vasorelaxant effect.
AID1598449Selectivity ratio of IC50 for N-terminal GST-tagged human PDE7 to IC50 for N-terminal GST-tagged human PDE5A12019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-23, Volume: 62, Issue:10
Pharmacokinetics-Driven Optimization of 4(3 H)-Pyrimidinones as Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors Leading to TPN171, a Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
AID159035Inhibitory activity against phosphodiesterase 11 (PDE11) obtained from recombinant Sf9 expression2003Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-17, Volume: 13, Issue:8
Design, synthesis and biological activity of beta-carboline-based type-5 phosphodiesterase inhibitors.
AID410415Inhibition of human recombinant PDE112008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-01, Volume: 18, Issue:23
Quinazolines as potent and highly selective PDE5 inhibitors as potential therapeutics for male erectile dysfunction.
AID625280Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholecystitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1598429Selectivity ratio of IC50 for N-terminal GST-tagged human PDE6C to IC50 for N-terminal GST-tagged human PDE5A12019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-23, Volume: 62, Issue:10
Pharmacokinetics-Driven Optimization of 4(3 H)-Pyrimidinones as Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors Leading to TPN171, a Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
AID1598445Selectivity ratio of IC50 for N-terminal GST-tagged human PDE1 to IC50 for N-terminal GST-tagged human PDE5A12019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-23, Volume: 62, Issue:10
Pharmacokinetics-Driven Optimization of 4(3 H)-Pyrimidinones as Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors Leading to TPN171, a Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
AID1421851Selectivity ratio of Ki for PDE6 (unknown origin) to Ki for PDE5 (unknown origin)2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-05, Volume: 158Discovery of furyl/thienyl β-carboline derivatives as potent and selective PDE5 inhibitors with excellent vasorelaxant effect.
AID305334Inhibition of bovine PDE5 after 24 hrs by HTRF2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 17, Issue:3
PDE5 inhibitors: An original access to novel potent arylated analogues of tadalafil.
AID1207268Inhibition of long-lasting type calcium current (hICa) in Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells expressing hCav1.2 measured using IonWorks Quattro automated patch clamp platform
AID342571Vasorelaxation activity against noradrenaline-induced hypertonic contraction in Wistar rat aorta strips at 5 mM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-14, Volume: 51, Issue:15
Methyl (11aS)-1,2,3,5,11,11a-hexahydro-3,3-dimethyl-1-oxo-6H-imidazo-[3',4':1,2]pyridin[3,4-b]indol-2-substituted acetates: synthesis and three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship investigation as a class of novel vasodilators.
AID1635442Aqueous solubility of compound in water at 37 degC after 48 hrs by HPLC analysis2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-23, Volume: 59, Issue:12
Tetrahydroisoquinoline-Derived Urea and 2,5-Diketopiperazine Derivatives as Selective Antagonists of the Transient Receptor Potential Melastatin 8 (TRPM8) Channel Receptor and Antiprostate Cancer Agents.
AID625286Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID410414Inhibition of bovine PDE62008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-01, Volume: 18, Issue:23
Quinazolines as potent and highly selective PDE5 inhibitors as potential therapeutics for male erectile dysfunction.
AID1598436Inhibition of human PDE2A1 expressed in baculovirus infected sf9 cells using [3H]cAMP as substrate measured after 30 mins by scintillation proximity assay2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-23, Volume: 62, Issue:10
Pharmacokinetics-Driven Optimization of 4(3 H)-Pyrimidinones as Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors Leading to TPN171, a Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
AID625288Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for jaundice2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1421850Inhibition of PDE5 (unknown origin)2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-05, Volume: 158Discovery of furyl/thienyl β-carboline derivatives as potent and selective PDE5 inhibitors with excellent vasorelaxant effect.
AID392051Inhibition of human ERG channel in HEK293 cells by voltage-clamp method2008European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 43, Issue:11
Identification of "toxicophoric" features for predicting drug-induced QT interval prolongation.
AID229979Relative inhibition of bovine aorta PDE1 and PDE52003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-09, Volume: 46, Issue:21
The discovery of tadalafil: a novel and highly selective PDE5 inhibitor. 2: 2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino[1',2':1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione analogues.
AID244235Ratio of inhibitory constant against phosphodiesterase 3 and phosphodiesterase 5 in rat fetal lung fibroblast (RFL-6) cells2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 48, Issue:6
Pyrroloquinolone PDE5 inhibitors with improved pharmaceutical profiles for clinical studies on erectile dysfunction.
AID366091Inhibition of PDE52008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-15, Volume: 16, Issue:16
In silico prediction of novel phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors derived from Sildenafil, Vardenafil and Tadalafil.
AID1321724Cytotoxicity against mouse primary glial cells assessed as reduction in cell viability after 72 hrs by luminescence based ATPlite assay2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-13, Volume: 59, Issue:19
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of First-in-Class Dual Acting Histone Deacetylases (HDACs) and Phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) Inhibitors for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.
AID1598448Selectivity ratio of IC50 for N-terminal GST-tagged human PDE4 to IC50 for N-terminal GST-tagged human PDE5A12019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-23, Volume: 62, Issue:10
Pharmacokinetics-Driven Optimization of 4(3 H)-Pyrimidinones as Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors Leading to TPN171, a Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
AID1598440Inhibition of N-terminal GST-tagged human PDE7 expressed in baculovirus infected sf9 cells using [3H]cAMP as substrate measured after 30 mins by scintillation proximity assay2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-23, Volume: 62, Issue:10
Pharmacokinetics-Driven Optimization of 4(3 H)-Pyrimidinones as Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors Leading to TPN171, a Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
AID1598439Inhibition of N-terminal GST-tagged human PDE6C expressed in baculovirus infected sf9 cells using [3H]cGMP as substrate measured after 30 mins by scintillation proximity assay2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-23, Volume: 62, Issue:10
Pharmacokinetics-Driven Optimization of 4(3 H)-Pyrimidinones as Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors Leading to TPN171, a Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
AID1207542Inhibition of rapid delayed inward rectifying potassium current (IKr) measured using manual patch clamp assay
AID566804Inhibition of human recombinant PDE3B-mediated hydrolysis of cGMP after 30 mins by fluorescence polarization assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Synthesis and molecular modeling of novel tetrahydro-β-carboline derivatives with phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitory and anticancer properties.
AID366092Octanol-water partition coefficient, log P of the compound2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-15, Volume: 16, Issue:16
In silico prediction of novel phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors derived from Sildenafil, Vardenafil and Tadalafil.
AID566807Inhibition of human recombinant PDE11A-mediated hydrolysis of cGMP after 30 mins by fluorescence polarization assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Synthesis and molecular modeling of novel tetrahydro-β-carboline derivatives with phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitory and anticancer properties.
AID23905The total clearance time in plasma in rat was determined2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-09, Volume: 46, Issue:21
The discovery of tadalafil: a novel and highly selective PDE5 inhibitor. 2: 2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino[1',2':1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione analogues.
AID1598447Selectivity ratio of IC50 for N-terminal GST-tagged human PDE3 to IC50 for N-terminal GST-tagged human PDE5A12019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-23, Volume: 62, Issue:10
Pharmacokinetics-Driven Optimization of 4(3 H)-Pyrimidinones as Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors Leading to TPN171, a Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
AID735476Selectivity ratio of IC50 for PDE2 (unknown origin) to IC50 for PDE5 (unknown origin)2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 60Synthesis of quinoline derivatives: discovery of a potent and selective phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID1321698Selectivity ratio of pLC50 for mouse primary glial cells to pLC50 for human THLE2 cells2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-13, Volume: 59, Issue:19
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of First-in-Class Dual Acting Histone Deacetylases (HDACs) and Phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) Inhibitors for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.
AID157951Inhibition of Phosphodiesterase 5 from human platelets2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-13, Volume: 46, Issue:4
Substituted pyrazolopyridopyridazines as orally bioavailable potent and selective PDE5 inhibitors: potential agents for treatment of erectile dysfunction.
AID158129Inhibitory activity against phosphodiesterase 6 (PDE6) obtained from canine or bovine retina2003Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-17, Volume: 13, Issue:8
Design, synthesis and biological activity of beta-carboline-based type-5 phosphodiesterase inhibitors.
AID735477Inhibition of PDE1 (unknown origin) using FAM-cGMP and FAM-cAMP as substrate after 60 mins by fluorescence assay2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 60Synthesis of quinoline derivatives: discovery of a potent and selective phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID229359Relative inhibition of PDE6 from bovine retina and PDE5 from human platelets2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-13, Volume: 46, Issue:4
Substituted pyrazolopyridopyridazines as orally bioavailable potent and selective PDE5 inhibitors: potential agents for treatment of erectile dysfunction.
AID1384234Inhibition of PDE5 in human SH-SY5Y cells assessed as induction of phosphorylated CREB level at 500 nM after 2 hrs by Western blot analysis relative to control2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-25, Volume: 150Design, synthesis, biological evaluation and in vivo testing of dual phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) and histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6)-selective inhibitors for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID735486Inhibition of PDE2 (unknown origin) using FAM-cGMP and FAM-cAMP as substrate after 60 mins by fluorescence assay2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 60Synthesis of quinoline derivatives: discovery of a potent and selective phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID229357Relative inhibition of PDE3 and PDE5 from human platelets2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-13, Volume: 46, Issue:4
Substituted pyrazolopyridopyridazines as orally bioavailable potent and selective PDE5 inhibitors: potential agents for treatment of erectile dysfunction.
AID597189Cytotoxicity against human MRC5 SV2 cells after 72 hrs2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-12, Volume: 54, Issue:9
Drug to genome to drug: discovery of new antiplasmodial compounds.
AID625283Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for elevated liver function tests2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1380338Inhibition of PDE5 (unknown origin)2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 08-09, Volume: 61, Issue:15
Mapping the Efficiency and Physicochemical Trajectories of Successful Optimizations.
AID1421863Inhibition of full length recombinant human N-terminal GST-tagged PDE9A2 expressed in baculovirus infected sf9 cells using FAM-cyclic-3',5-AMP as substrate after 1 hr by fluorescence polarization assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-05, Volume: 158Discovery of furyl/thienyl β-carboline derivatives as potent and selective PDE5 inhibitors with excellent vasorelaxant effect.
AID1321739Inhibition of PDE5A in human SH-SY5Y cells assessed as increase in CREB phosphorylation at Ser133 residue at 500 nM after 2 hrs by Western blot analysis relative to control2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-13, Volume: 59, Issue:19
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of First-in-Class Dual Acting Histone Deacetylases (HDACs) and Phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) Inhibitors for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.
AID1421852Inhibition of full length recombinant human N-terminal GST-tagged PDE5A1 expressed in baculovirus infected sf9 cells using FAM-cyclic-3',5-GMP as substrate after 1 hr by fluorescence polarization assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-05, Volume: 158Discovery of furyl/thienyl β-carboline derivatives as potent and selective PDE5 inhibitors with excellent vasorelaxant effect.
AID157949Inhibitory activity against phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) obtained from human corpus cavernosum tissue2003Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-17, Volume: 13, Issue:8
Design, synthesis and biological activity of beta-carboline-based type-5 phosphodiesterase inhibitors.
AID1421871Inhibition of PDE5 in Wistar rat mesentric arteries assessed as inhibition of phenylephrine-induced contraction by measuring increase in acetylcholine-induced vasorelaxation by pressure myographic method2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-05, Volume: 158Discovery of furyl/thienyl β-carboline derivatives as potent and selective PDE5 inhibitors with excellent vasorelaxant effect.
AID625291Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver function tests abnormal2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1384231Inhibition of class-1 HDAC in human SH-SY5Y cells assessed as induction of AcH3K9 level at 1000 nM after 2 hrs by Western blot analysis relative to control2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-25, Volume: 150Design, synthesis, biological evaluation and in vivo testing of dual phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) and histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6)-selective inhibitors for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID229355Relative inhibition of PDE1 from bovine heart and PDE5 from human platelets2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-13, Volume: 46, Issue:4
Substituted pyrazolopyridopyridazines as orally bioavailable potent and selective PDE5 inhibitors: potential agents for treatment of erectile dysfunction.
AID735474Selectivity ratio of IC50 for PDE3 (unknown origin) to IC50 for PDE5 (unknown origin)2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 60Synthesis of quinoline derivatives: discovery of a potent and selective phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID625292Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) combined score2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID159782Inhibition of Human recombinant PDE4 (Phosphodiesterase 4)2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-09, Volume: 46, Issue:21
The discovery of tadalafil: a novel and highly selective PDE5 inhibitor. 2: 2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino[1',2':1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione analogues.
AID1207355Inhibition of fast sodium current (INa) in HEK293 cells transfected with human Nav1.5 measured using IonWorks Quattro automated patch clamp platform
AID1384228Inhibition of HDAC6 in human SH-SY5Y cells assessed as induction of tubulin K-40 acetylation level at 1000 nM after 2 hrs by Western blot analysis relative to control2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-25, Volume: 150Design, synthesis, biological evaluation and in vivo testing of dual phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) and histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6)-selective inhibitors for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID1473738Inhibition of human BSEP overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-taurocholate in presence of ATP measured after 15 to 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID229358Relative inhibition of PDE4 from rat kidney and PDE5 from human platelets2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-13, Volume: 46, Issue:4
Substituted pyrazolopyridopyridazines as orally bioavailable potent and selective PDE5 inhibitors: potential agents for treatment of erectile dysfunction.
AID1321728Inhibition of class 1 histone deacetylase in human SH-SY5Y cells assessed as increase in histone H3K9 acetylation after 2 hrs by Western blot analysis2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-13, Volume: 59, Issue:19
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of First-in-Class Dual Acting Histone Deacetylases (HDACs) and Phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) Inhibitors for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.
AID625290Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver fatty2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID659073Cytotoxicity against human MRC5 SV2 cells after 72 hrs using resazurin by fluorimetry2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-09, Volume: 55, Issue:3
Drug-to-genome-to-drug, step 2: reversing selectivity in a series of antiplasmodial compounds.
AID625279Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for bilirubinemia2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID244248Ratio of inhibitory constant against cone phosphodiesterase 6 and phosphodiesterase 5 in rat fetal lung fibroblast (RFL-6) cells2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 48, Issue:6
Pyrroloquinolone PDE5 inhibitors with improved pharmaceutical profiles for clinical studies on erectile dysfunction.
AID1384205Inhibition of PDE5A (unknown origin)2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-25, Volume: 150Design, synthesis, biological evaluation and in vivo testing of dual phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) and histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6)-selective inhibitors for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID1207509Inhibition of rapid delayed inward rectifying potassium current (IKr) in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stable expressing hERG measured using IonWorks Barracuda automated patch clamp platform
AID735468Selectivity ratio of IC50 for PDE11 (unknown origin) to IC50 for PDE5 (unknown origin)2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 60Synthesis of quinoline derivatives: discovery of a potent and selective phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID1474166Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring severity class index2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID735469Selectivity ratio of IC50 for PDE9 (unknown origin) to IC50 for PDE5 (unknown origin)2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 60Synthesis of quinoline derivatives: discovery of a potent and selective phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID625287Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatomegaly2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID735479Inhibition of PDE9 (unknown origin) using FAM-cGMP as substrate after 60 mins by fluorescence assay2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 60Synthesis of quinoline derivatives: discovery of a potent and selective phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID244238Ratio of inhibitory constant against phosphodiesterase 1 and phosphodiesterase 5 in rat fetal lung fibroblast (RFL-6) cells2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 48, Issue:6
Pyrroloquinolone PDE5 inhibitors with improved pharmaceutical profiles for clinical studies on erectile dysfunction.
AID597188Antiplasmodial activity against chloroquine-susceptible Plasmodium falciparum GHA strain infected in human erythrocytes after 72 hrs by spectrophotometry2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-12, Volume: 54, Issue:9
Drug to genome to drug: discovery of new antiplasmodial compounds.
AID244236Ratio of inhibitory constant against phosphodiesterase 4 and phosphodiesterase 5 in rat fetal lung fibroblast (RFL-6) cells2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 48, Issue:6
Pyrroloquinolone PDE5 inhibitors with improved pharmaceutical profiles for clinical studies on erectile dysfunction.
AID625281Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholelithiasis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1193734Antimalarial activity against MRA-150, chloroquine, pyrimethamine, mefloquine-resistant asexual blood stage Plasmodium falciparum Dd2 after 72 hrs by SYBR green assay2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 25, Issue:7
Determination of the active stereoisomer of the MEP pathway-targeting antimalarial agent MMV008138, and initial structure-activity studies.
AID1207415Inhibition of slow delayed inward rectifying potassium current (Iks) in Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells transfected with KCNQ1 / Kv1.7 / KvLQT1 and KCNE1/minK measured using IonWorks automated patch clamp platform
AID735487Inhibition of PDE5 (unknown origin) using FAM-cGMP as substrate after 60 mins by fluorescence assay2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 60Synthesis of quinoline derivatives: discovery of a potent and selective phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID240961Inhibition of human phosphodiesterase 52005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-02, Volume: 15, Issue:9
Optimization of purine based PDE1/PDE5 inhibitors to a potent and selective PDE5 inhibitor for the treatment of male ED.
AID1207388Inhibition of slow delayed inward rectifying potassium current (Iks) in Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells expressing hKvLQT1/hminK measured using IonWorks Quattro automated patch clamp platform
AID735484Inhibition of PDE4 (unknown origin) using FAM-cAMP as substrate after 60 mins by fluorescence assay2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 60Synthesis of quinoline derivatives: discovery of a potent and selective phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID1207295Inhibition of long-lasting type calcium current (ICaL) in HEK293 cells (alpha1C/beta2a/alpha2delta1) cells measured using IonWorks Barracuda automated patch clamp platform
AID1173630Selectivity for PDE5 (unknown origin) over PDE11 (unknown origin)2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-01, Volume: 24, Issue:23
The discovery of avanafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: a novel pyrimidine-5-carboxamide derivative as a potent and highly selective phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor.
AID454868Inhibition of bovine platelet PDE52010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-01, Volume: 20, Issue:1
Discovery of potent, selective, and orally bioavailable PDE5 inhibitor: Methyl-4-(3-chloro-4-methoxybenzylamino)-8-(2-hydroxyethyl)-7-methoxyquinazolin-6-ylmethylcarbamate (CKD 533).
AID240962Inhibition of human phosphodiesterase 62005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-02, Volume: 15, Issue:9
Optimization of purine based PDE1/PDE5 inhibitors to a potent and selective PDE5 inhibitor for the treatment of male ED.
AID625282Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cirrhosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID735481Inhibition of PDE8 (unknown origin) using FAM-cAMP as substrate after 60 mins by fluorescence assay2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 60Synthesis of quinoline derivatives: discovery of a potent and selective phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID1384233Inhibition of PDE5 in human SH-SY5Y cells assessed as induction of phosphorylated CREB level at 500 nM after 30 mins by Western blot analysis relative to control2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-25, Volume: 150Design, synthesis, biological evaluation and in vivo testing of dual phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) and histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6)-selective inhibitors for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID735485Inhibition of PDE3 (unknown origin) using FAM-cGMP and FAM-cAMP as substrate after 60 mins by fluorescence assay2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 60Synthesis of quinoline derivatives: discovery of a potent and selective phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID1598452Selectivity ratio of IC50 for N-terminal GST-tagged human PDE10A to IC50 for N-terminal GST-tagged human PDE5A12019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-23, Volume: 62, Issue:10
Pharmacokinetics-Driven Optimization of 4(3 H)-Pyrimidinones as Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors Leading to TPN171, a Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
AID735467Selectivity ratio of IC50 for PDE10 (unknown origin) to IC50 for PDE5 (unknown origin)2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 60Synthesis of quinoline derivatives: discovery of a potent and selective phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
AID1321732Inhibition of class 1 histone deacetylase in human SH-SY5Y cells assessed as increase in histone H3K9 acetylation at 1000 nM after 2 hrs by Western blot analysis relative to control2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-13, Volume: 59, Issue:19
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of First-in-Class Dual Acting Histone Deacetylases (HDACs) and Phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) Inhibitors for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.
AID1421858Inhibition of full length recombinant human N-terminal GST-tagged PDE6C expressed in baculovirus infected sf9 cells using FAM-cyclic-3',5-AMP as substrate after 1 hr by fluorescence polarization assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-05, Volume: 158Discovery of furyl/thienyl β-carboline derivatives as potent and selective PDE5 inhibitors with excellent vasorelaxant effect.
AID157928In vitro inhibitory activity against bovine phosphodiesterase 52003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-09, Volume: 46, Issue:21
The discovery of tadalafil: a novel and highly selective PDE5 inhibitor. 2: 2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino[1',2':1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione analogues.
AID1598487Half-life in iv dosed rat2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-23, Volume: 62, Issue:10
Pharmacokinetics-Driven Optimization of 4(3 H)-Pyrimidinones as Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors Leading to TPN171, a Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
AID1321725Passive membrane permeability of the compound at 50 uM after 18 hrs by PAMPA2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-13, Volume: 59, Issue:19
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of First-in-Class Dual Acting Histone Deacetylases (HDACs) and Phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) Inhibitors for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.
AID1345264Human phosphodiesterase 5A (Phosphodiesterases, 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide (PDEs))2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Synthesis and molecular modeling of novel tetrahydro-β-carboline derivatives with phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitory and anticancer properties.
AID1345221Human phosphodiesterase 11A (Phosphodiesterases, 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide (PDEs))2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Synthesis and molecular modeling of novel tetrahydro-β-carboline derivatives with phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitory and anticancer properties.
AID1797296Phosphodiesterase (PDE) Inhibition Assay from Article 10.1016/j.str.2004.10.004: \\Structural basis for the activity of drugs that inhibit phosphodiesterases.\\2004Structure (London, England : 1993), Dec, Volume: 12, Issue:12
Structural basis for the activity of drugs that inhibit phosphodiesterases.
AID1159607Screen for inhibitors of RMI FANCM (MM2) intereaction2016Journal of biomolecular screening, Jul, Volume: 21, Issue:6
A High-Throughput Screening Strategy to Identify Protein-Protein Interaction Inhibitors That Block the Fanconi Anemia DNA Repair Pathway.
AID977608Experimentally measured binding affinity data (IC50) for protein-ligand complexes derived from PDB2004Structure (London, England : 1993), Dec, Volume: 12, Issue:12
Structural basis for the activity of drugs that inhibit phosphodiesterases.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (1,613)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's443 (27.46)29.6817
2010's862 (53.44)24.3611
2020's308 (19.09)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 62.18

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index62.18 (24.57)
Research Supply Index7.67 (2.92)
Research Growth Index4.73 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index132.11 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.43 (0.95)

This Compound (62.18)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials392 (22.50%)5.53%
Reviews239 (13.72%)6.00%
Case Studies111 (6.37%)4.05%
Observational18 (1.03%)0.25%
Other982 (56.37%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (212)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Randomized Control Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Tadalafil in Raynaud's Phenomenon in Scleroderma: A Double Blind, Parallel Group, Multicentric Study [NCT01117298]Phase 366 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Completed
Acute and Subacute Effect of Tadalafil Administration on Vasodilatation Mediated by Flow in Patients With Obesity Grade I-ii and Erectil Dysfunction [NCT03905018]Phase 380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-05-01Recruiting
A Prospective, Open-label, Platform Study for Long-term Follow-up of Participants Using Study Intervention in Pulmonary Hypertension Parent Studies [NCT05179876]Phase 3230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-04Recruiting
Functional Muscle Ischemia and PDE5A Inhibition in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy [NCT01359670]Early Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Focused Shockwave Therapy Plus Tadalafil vs Tadalafil Alone in Patient With Erectile Dysfunction: Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05823506]36 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-01Recruiting
Clinical Efficacy of Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitor Tadalafil in Eisenmenger Syndrome - A Randomised, Placebo Controlled, Double Blind, Crossover Study [NCT01200732]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
"Effect of Tadalafil, Sildenafil and Pentoxyfylline on Endometrial Thickness and Frozen Embryo Transfer Outcomes" [NCT05971667]Phase 2/Phase 3200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-30Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of the Effects of a Daily Dose of 5 mg of Tadalafil on Lymphocyte to Monocyte Ratio and Monocyte to High-Density Lipoprotein Ratio in Patients With Erectile Dysfunction [NCT03918993]62 participants (Actual)Observational2019-02-14Completed
A Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial of Tadalafil for Erectile Dysfunction in Patients With Cirrhosis [NCT03566914]140 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-30Completed
PDE5 Inhibition for Obesity-Related Cardiometabolic Dysfunction [NCT02819440]Phase 2141 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Completed
A Randomized Controlled Double-Blind Trial for Prevention of Recurrent Ischemic Priapism in Men With Sickle Cell Disease: A Pilot Study [NCT05142254]Phase 264 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-04-01Active, not recruiting
[NCT03246880]Phase 3455 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
Raising the Bars in the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Goal Oriented Strategy to Preserve Ejection Fraction Trial [NCT03236818]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-05-31Active, not recruiting
Multi-center, Randomized,Placebo and Positive Controlled Clinical Study of TPN171H Tablets on Acute Haemodynamics in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension [NCT04483115]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-16Completed
An Open-label, Randomized, Multiple-dose Crossover Study to Evaluate a Pharmacokinetic Drug Interaction Between Tadalafil and Tamsulosin in Healthy Male Volunteers [NCT02239484]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Completed
Assessment of Single-dose Oral Tadalafil Pharmacokinetic Characteristics When Simultaneously Co-administered With Single-dose and Steady-state Tipranavir/Ritonavir 500 mg/200 mg to Healthy Male Volunteers [NCT02253862]Phase 117 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
A Prospective, Randomized, 3-arm Parallel Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Clinical Effectiveness of 2 Lower Dose Combined PDE5i's vs. Single Maximal Dose PDE5i Treatment [NCT01364701]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-06-30Not yet recruiting
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Low Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus On-demand Tadalafil for Erectile Dysfunction [NCT05199727]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-01Recruiting
[NCT02839122]Phase 128 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Design, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Urodynamic Effects of Tadalafil Once a Day for 12 Weeks in Men With Signs and Symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia [NCT00386009]Phase 2200 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
Tadalafil as an Adjuvant to Therapy for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy [NCT05195775]Phase 2/Phase 325 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-14Recruiting
A Pilot Study to Investigate the Effect of Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors on Chorioretinal Blood Flow Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. [NCT04052269]Phase 330 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-06-21Suspended(stopped due to suspended due to COVID)
A Single-center, Open-label, Single-dose, Randomized, 2-way Crossover Phase 1 Study in Healthy Adult Participants to Assess the Relative Oral Bioavailability of the Combination of Macitentan/Tadalafil (10 mg/20 mg) Administered a Fixed-dose Combination Fo [NCT04540744]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-04-30Completed
Tadalafil and Acetazolamide Versus Acetazolamide in Acute Mountain Sickness Prevention [NCT01060969]55 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
Prospective, Multi-center, Double-blind, Randomized, Active-controlled, Triple-dummy, Parallel-group, Group-sequential, Adaptive Phase 3 Clinical Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Macitentan and Tadalafil Monotherapies With the Corresponding Fix [NCT03904693]Phase 3187 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-07-29Active, not recruiting
Effect of PDE5 Inhibitor on Respiratory Symptoms in COPD Complicated by Pulmonary Hypertension [NCT05937854]Phase 2126 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-15Not yet recruiting
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Design, 5-Group, Multinational Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Dose Response, and Safety of Tadalafil Once-a-Day Dosing for 12 Weeks in Men With Signs and Symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia [NCT00384930]Phase 2/Phase 31,058 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
Investigational and Comparative Study to Assess Safety and Effectiveness of Tadalafil and Pentoxifyllin in the Management of Diabetic Nephropathy [NCT05487755]Phase 390 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-01-01Active, not recruiting
Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study on Men With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms to Assess Changes in Pressure Flow Study and in Molecular Profile of Prostatic Tissue After 12 Weeks Treatment With Tadalafil. [NCT02252367]Phase 486 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
A Study Evaluating the Therapeutic Efficacy of Tamsulosin and Tadalafil Compared to Placebo in the Treatment and Prevention of Urinary Disorders After Transperineal Prostate Biopsy [NCT05537272]Phase 4120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-01Enrolling by invitation
The Effect of Selective PDE-5 Inhibition on Capillary Recruitment, Glucose Uptake and Endothelial Function Following a Mixed Meal in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Patients. [NCT01238224]Phase 122 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Durability of study medications could not be guaranteed after the expire date.)
An Open-label Trial of Oral Selegiline 5 or 10 mg and Tadalafil 2.5mg Co-administration to Male Patients With Parkinson's Disease and Moderate Erectile Dysfunction. [NCT02225548]Phase 410 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-09-30Recruiting
PERIOP-04 Phase Ib Trial of Perioperative Tadalafil and Influenza Vaccination in Cancer Patients Undergoing Major Surgical Resection of a Primary Abdominal Malignancy [NCT02998736]Phase 128 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-21Completed
The Effect of Tadalafil on Cerebral Large Arteries in Stroke Patients [NCT02801032]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-29Completed
The Phosphodiesterase Inhibitor Tadalafil as an Adjunct to Antidepressants in Major Depressive Disorder Patients: Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial [NCT05030623]Phase 1/Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-01Recruiting
Effect of Tadalafil on Exercise Capacity in Pediatric Fontan Patients [NCT01291069]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
A Prospective Case-crossover Study to Evaluate the Possible Association Between the Use of PDE5 Inhibitors and the Risk of Acute Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION) [NCT01131104]345 participants (Actual)Observational2010-05-31Completed
Do Phosphodiesterase 5A Inhibitors Improve Exercise Capacity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Pulmonary Hypertension? [NCT01197469]Phase 2120 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
The Effects of Mirabegron and Tadalafil on Glucose Tolerance in Prediabetics [NCT05051436]Phase 496 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-13Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel, Placebo-Controlled Study in Men With Erectile Dysfunction to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil When Sexual Attempts Occur at Specific Time Points After Dosing [NCT00547508]Phase 3485 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-10-31Completed
Non Ablative Erbium:YAG Laser Transurethral Treatment for Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome in Younger Patients: a Prospective Comparative Study [NCT04446598]36 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-13Completed
Exploratory Trial of Immunochemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma [NCT01342224]Phase 111 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
Investigator Sponsored Research Proposal : Efficacy and Safety of Combination Ambrisentan and TadaLafil in PATiEnts With PortoPulmonary Hypertension (ESCALATE-PPH) [NCT03309592]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-12Withdrawn(stopped due to Lack of eligible participants and failure to meeting study enrollment.)
Study on New Insights in Remodeling of Endocrine Cardiomyopathies: Intramyocardial, Molecular and Neuroendocrine Assessment in Response to Chronic Inhibition of Cyclic GMP Phosphodiesterase 5A in Cushing's Syndrome [NCT02611258]Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Completed
Skeletal Muscle Blood Flow in Becker Muscular Dystrophy [NCT02653833]Early Phase 16 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-01Terminated(stopped due to PI passed away)
Effects of Daily Tadalafil on Body Composition in Men With Sexual Distress [NCT02554045]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
An Open-label, Multicenter Study of Ambrisentan and a Phosphodiesterase Type-5 Inhibitor Combination Therapy in Subjects With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Who Have Demonstrated a Sub-Optimal Response to a Phosphodiesterase Type-5 Inhibitor [NCT00617305]Phase 438 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
A Phase 1 Study to Demonstrate the Relative Bioavailability of Fixed Dose Combinations of Ambrisentan and Tadalafil in Healthy Subjects [NCT02688387]Phase 1112 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-18Completed
The Safety of Dapoxetine/Tadalafil Combination Therapy in Treatment of Men With Premature Ejaculation and Erectile Dysfunction [NCT03177746]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-31Not yet recruiting
Low Dose Tadalafil 5mg for Treatment of Female Overactive Bladder Syndrome :6 Months Follow up [NCT04500860]Phase 190 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-01Completed
The Effect of Combination Therapy Using Li-ESWT (Low Intensity Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy) and PDE-5 Inhibitor in Patients With Erectile Dysfunction [NCT05043896]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-12-10Completed
A Prospective, Randomized, International, Multicenter, Double-arm, Controlled, Open-label Study of Riociguat in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) Who Are on a Stable Dose of Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitors (PDE-5i) With or Without Endothe [NCT02891850]Phase 4225 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-11Completed
The Use of Tadalafil in Confirmed COVID-19 Pneumonia. [NCT04946162]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-04-20Withdrawn(stopped due to The investigators never completed the IRB application due to decrease in need to conduct the study.)
A Randomized, Open Label, Single Dose, Two-way Crossover Clinical Trial to Investigate the Pharmacokinetics and Safety/Tolerability of YY-201 in Comparison to Dutasteride and Tadalafil Administered in Healthy Male Volunteer [NCT03240939]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-27Completed
A Phase II Study of Tadalafil and Pembrolizumab in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma [NCT03993353]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-04-07Active, not recruiting
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Tadalafil Versus Placebo in Improving Hemodynamics and End-Organ Dysfunction in Fontan Physiology (TRIUMPH Trial) [NCT05206955]Phase 380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-16Recruiting
An Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of the Phosphodiesterase Type 5 (PDE5) Inhibitor Tadalafil in the Treatment of Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension [NCT00549302]Phase 3357 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
Tadalafil 5 mg Once a Day Compared to Placebo in Improving Erectile Dysfunction and Sexual Quality of Life [NCT00422734]Phase 3342 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
Single-center, Open-label, Single-dose, 2-period, Randomized, Crossover Phase 1 Study to Demonstrate Bioequivalence of Tadalafil Administered as a Fixed Dose Combination Formulation of Macitentan/Tadalafil (10 mg/40 mg) and as the Free Combination of 10 m [NCT04235270]Phase 162 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-17Completed
A Randomized, Open-label, Multi-center, Parallel Group Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Vardenafil in Comparison to Tadalafil in Males With Erectile Dysfunction and a Diagnosis of Diabetes, Hypertension or Hyperlipidemia [NCT00668109]Phase 3614 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-31Completed
A Phase II Trial of Tadalafil in Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Upper Aero Digestive Tract [NCT00894413]Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-08Completed
Efficacy of Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors in Severe Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [NCT05844462]Phase 3200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-31Not yet recruiting
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Design, Multinational Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil 2.5 and 5 mg Once Daily Dosing for 12 Weeks for the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction and Signs and Symptoms of Benign Pr [NCT00855582]Phase 3606 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
Obesity-induced ED Response to Combined Effect of Tadalafil Drug in Addition to Interval and Continuous Training [NCT04623840]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-10-12Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Design, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effects of 5 mg Tadalafil (IC351, LY450190) and 50 mg Sildenafil Administered Once Daily for 6 Months on Visual Function in Healthy Subjects or Subjects With Mild Erecti [NCT00333281]Phase 4198 participants Interventional2005-06-30Completed
Pilot Study of Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitor Tadalafil (Cialis) as an Immunomodulator in Patients With Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. [NCT00843635]35 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
[NCT00705588]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-08-31Not yet recruiting
A Comparison of Psychosocial Outcomes Following Tadalafil Once a Day or PDE5 Inhibitor As Needed in Men With Erectile Dysfunction. [NCT00734604]Phase 3378 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
A Postmarketing Observational Study to Assess Respiratory Tract Adverse Events in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Patients Treated With Tyvaso® (Treprostinil) Inhalation Solution [NCT01266265]1,333 participants (Actual)Observational2010-12-31Completed
Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System (RAAS) and Fibrinolysis in Humans: ACEi [NCT00750308]27 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Design Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Daily Tadalafil for 12 Weeks in Men With Signs and Symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia on Concomitant Alpha1-Adrenergic Blocker Ther [NCT00848081]Phase 3318 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
[NCT02862483]Phase 3330 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-03-31Recruiting
Tadalafil Once Daily Following As-Needed Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitor Treatment, an Assessment of Return to Normal Erectile Function [NCT01130532]Phase 4623 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
Impact of Tadalafil (LY450190) Once a Day or Tadalafil on Demand Compared to Sildenafil Citrate on Demand on Treatment Discontinuation in Patients With Erectile Dysfunction Who Are naïve to PDE5 Inhibitors [NCT01122264]Phase 4770 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
National, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Toronto Association in the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction and Premature Ejaculation [NCT05052879]Phase 3232 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-07-31Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of Retinal and Choriocapillary Vascular Changes Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Patients Undergoing Tadalafil 20mg on Alternative Days: a Single-centre Prospective-control [NCT04164355]40 participants (Actual)Observational2020-07-04Completed
PDE5 Inhibition Via Tadalafil (Cialis®) to Enhance Anti-Tumor MUC1 Vaccine Efficacy in Patients With Resectable, and Recurrent or Second Primary Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC): A Phase I/II Clinical Trial [NCT02544880]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-25Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo and Tamsulosin Controlled, Parallel Design, Multinational Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil Once a Day Dosing for 12 Weeks in Asian Men With Signs and Symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplas [NCT00861757]Phase 3612 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
Switching From Sildenafil Citrate to Tadalafil in Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: Assessment of Treatment Preference [NCT00547352]Phase 4160 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-30Completed
A Multicenter, Parallel-Arm, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil Administered Once Daily to Men With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia [NCT00547625]Phase 2275 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-31Completed
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Examine the Utility of Tadalafil (5mg) For Treatment of Early Storage Symptoms and Erectile Dysfunction After Anatomical Endoscopic Enucleation of Prostate (AEEP) [NCT05955001]Phase 2/Phase 3110 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-01Active, not recruiting
Study on New Insights in Remodeling of Endocrine Cardiomyopathies: ASsessmentt of Intramyocardial, Molecular and NeUroendocrine Parameters in Response to Chronic Inhibition of Cyclic GMP Phosphodiesterase 5A in AcroMegaly [NCT02611336]Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Completed
Effect of PDE5 Inhibition on Adipose Metabolism in Humans [NCT04684589]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-16Recruiting
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect on Unassisted Erectile Function of the Early Use of Tadalafil 5 mg Once a Day and Tadalafil 20 mg On Demand Treatment for 9 Months in Subjects Undergoing Bilateral Nerve-Sparing R [NCT01026818]Phase 4583 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Completed
Effects on Insulin Resistance With the Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitor Tadalafil in Type 2 Diabetes - a Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Crossover Study [NCT02601989]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-30Completed
"An Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil Administered On Demand to Men of Various Populations With Erectile Dysfunction" [NCT00547417]Phase 31,933 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-07-31Completed
"A Multinational, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil Administered On Demand to Asian Men With Erectile Dysfunction" [NCT00547573]Phase 3367 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-30Completed
Safety and Effectiveness of Adcirca (Tadalafil) in Japanese Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Open-label, Non-interventional Observational Study in Japan [NCT01066845]1,809 participants (Actual)Observational2010-01-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Cross-over Trial Assessing the Effect of Tadalafil (Cialis) on the Cardiovascular System in Men With Complete Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) at or Above the Sixth Thoracic Level [NCT01067391]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
Functional Muscle Ischemia and PDE5A Inhibition in Becker Muscular Dystrophy [NCT01070511]Phase 448 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Daily Tadalafil and Gastric Emptying Time in Diabetic Gastroparesis [NCT01326117]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Withdrawn(stopped due to lack of patients who meet inclusion criteria; there was one screen failure)
Can Tadalafil (Cialis)® Maintain Erectile Function In Patients Treated With External-beam Radiotherapy For Prostate Cancer? A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study [NCT00215631]Phase 3100 participants Interventional2005-10-31Terminated(stopped due to slow recruitment)
Phase I Trial of Chemoimmunotherapy and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. [NCT01903083]Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Completed
[NCT01942551]Phase 147 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
Improving Cerebral Blood Flow and Cognition in Patients With Cerebral Small Vessel Disease. The ETLAS-2 Trial [NCT05173896]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-31Recruiting
Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibition With Tadalafil Changes Outcomes in Heart Failure: Extent of Renal Damage (PITCH-ER) [NCT01960153]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Award was ended by NIH for parent study)
AMBITION: A Randomised, Multicenter Study of First-Line Ambrisentan and Tadalafil Combination Therapy in Subjects With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) [NCT01178073]Phase 3610 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-01Completed
Phase II Study of Nivolumab (Anti-PD1), Tadalafil and Oral Vancomycin in Patients With Refractory Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma or Liver Dominant Metastatic Cancer From Colorectal or Pancreatic Cancers [NCT03785210]Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-06-05Completed
A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of Tadalafil Once Daily for 8 Weeks on Prostatic Blood Flow and Perfusion Parameters in Men With Signs and Symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia [NCT01152190]Phase 397 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Tadalafil vs. Tadalafil With Sildosin in the Management of Moderately and Severely Symptomatic Patients of Prostatic Hyperplasia [NCT04577040]400 participants (Anticipated)Observational2020-10-01Not yet recruiting
A Multi-centre, Randomised, Open-label, Home Use, Parallel Group, Clinical Investigation of Topically-applied MED3000 Gel and Oral Tadalafil (5 mg) Tablets for the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction (ED) Over a 24 Week Period [NCT04984993]Phase 3116 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-09-14Completed
A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blinded, Double-dummy, Parallel Group, 48-week, Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of DKF-313 in Patients With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia [NCT04947631]Phase 3667 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-07-27Completed
Randomised Control Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Tadalafil in Raynaud's Phenomenon in Scleroderma [NCT00626665]Phase 325 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil (LY450190) Once a Day in Subjects With Erectile Dysfunction Who Are Naïve to PDE5 Inhibitors [NCT00836693]Phase 3217 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
An Open-Label, Phase II Single-Arm, Window Trial of Tadalafil Effect + Chemotherapy in Patients With Resectable Gastric/GEJ Adenocarcinoma [NCT05709574]Phase 210 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-03Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Design, Pilot Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil and Tamsulosin Once-a-Day Dosing for 12 Weeks in Asian Men With Signs and Symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia [NCT00540124]Phase 2151 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Cross-Over Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of IC351 in Female Patients With Raynaud Phenomenon and Female Sexual Dysfunction Secondary to Systemic Sclerosis [NCT00707187]Phase 2120 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-07-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil (LY450190) in Subjects With Erectile Dysfunction Caused by Spinal Cord Injury [NCT00421083]Phase 3180 participants Interventional2004-09-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase III Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitor, Tadalafil, in Prevention of Erectile Dysfunction in Patients Treated With Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer [NCT00931528]Phase 3242 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover, Multicenter, Single Dose Comparator Study Evaluating Onset Of Penile Rigidity In Men With Erectile Dysfunction Who Are Treated With Viagra (Sildenafil Citrate) And Cialis (Tadalafil) [NCT00644956]Phase 456 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Design, Global Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil Once Daily Dosing for 12 Weeks in Men With Signs and Symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia [NCT00970632]Phase 3511 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
A Randomised, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel-group, Active-controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Vardenafil Versus Tadalafil When Intercourse is Attempted Within 45 Minutes of Administration in Subjects With Erectile Dysfunction [NCT00663130]Phase 4759 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
A Phase 3b, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Parallel-design Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil Co-administered With Finasteride for 6 Months in Men With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Prostatic Enlargement Secondary to B [NCT01139762]Phase 3696 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo/Active-controlled, Phase II Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of YHD1023 in Patients With Erectile Dysfunction [NCT01423370]Phase 2104 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
A Randomized, Open-label, Oral Single Dosing, Two-way Crossover Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effects of Food on the Bioavailability of CKD-397 After a Single Oral Dose in Healthy Male Subjects [NCT02615782]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Design, Multinational Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Daily Tadalafil for 12 Weeks in Men With Signs and Symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia [NCT00827242]Phase 3325 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
Tadalafil 2.5 mg and 5 mg Once a Day Compared to Placebo in Day of Onset of Efficacy [NCT00833638]Phase 4372 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Design Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil Once-a-Day Dosing for 12 Weeks Followed by an Open-Label Extension to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Tadalafil i [NCT00783094]Phase 2422 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
Assessment of Efficacy of Mirabegron, Solifenacin, Tadalafil 5mg and Combination Therapy in Female Patients With Overactive Bladder: A Double Blinded Prospective Randomized Placebo -Controlled Trial [NCT06184334]300 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-09-14Completed
Prospective Observational Trial of Combination Therapy of Tadalafil 5mg Plus Tamsulosinmg for Men With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Erectile Dysfunction [NCT04383093]75 participants (Actual)Observational2017-01-01Completed
A Phase 1, Open Label, Randomized, Four Period, Crossover, Multiple Dose Study To Assess The Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Sitaxsentan and Tadalafil and The Effect Of Sildenafil On Sitaxsentan PK In Healthy Subjects [NCT01244620]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Safety Issue: The trial was prematurely terminated on Dec 9, 2010, due to safety concerns, specifically new emerging evidence of hepatic injury.)
Define in Preclinical Diastolic Dysfunction (PDD) With Renal Dysfunction, the Cardiorenal and Humoral Actions of Chronic Type V Phosphodiesterase (PDEV) Inhibition [NCT02058095]Phase 1/Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Completed
To Define the Role of PDEV in Mediating the Decreased GFR and Attenuated Renal Sodium and cGMP Excretory Response to Acute Saline Volume Expansion in PSD and PDD With Renal Dysfunction. [NCT01544998]Phase 1/Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
A Double Blind Randomized Control Trial of Tadalafil in Interstitial Lung Disease of Scleroderma [NCT01553981]Phase 340 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
Tadalafil for Sarcoidosis Associated Pulmonary Hypertension [NCT01324999]Phase 2/Phase 312 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
Functional Muscle Ischemia and PDE5 Inhibition in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Acute Dosing Study [NCT01580501]Phase 112 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
Observational Study to Evaluate the Effect of Tadalafil 5mg Once Daily on Erectile Dysfunction and QOL in Andropause Patients With Erectile Dysfunction [NCT02943356]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-07-31Recruiting
A Phase 2 Study of the Safety, Efficacy, and Immune Response of CRS-207, Pembrolizumab, Ipilimumab, and Tadalafil in Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma [NCT05014776]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-22Recruiting
Comparing The Effect of Tadalafil 5 mg/Day to Sildenafil 25 mg/Day on Neutrophil-Lymphocyte and Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratios in Erectile Dysfunction Patients; and Comparison of Clinical Response [NCT05466695]Early Phase 174 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-01Not yet recruiting
A Multicenter Open-Label Study to Determine Treatment Preference of Tadalafil (IC351, LY450190) or Sildenafil Citrate in the Oral Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction [NCT00547092]Phase 4386 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-31Completed
Switching From Sildenafil Citrate to Tadalafil in Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: Multinational Assessment of Treatment Preference [NCT00547287]Phase 32,760 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-11-30Completed
Does Presence of Distress Due to Erectile Dysfunction Affect the Effect of Tadalafil on Sexual Life and Life Satisfaction? [NCT00547599]Phase 4659 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-30Completed
The Pharmacological Basis for the Increase in Visual Time Constants Induced by Single Oral Doses of Sildenafil [NCT00463957]12 participants Interventional2006-08-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Design, Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil Once-a-day Dosing for 12 Weeks in Asian Men With Signs and Symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia [NCT01460342]Phase 3610 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial of Treprostinil Infusion Combined With Oral Tadalafil or Placebo in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension [NCT01302444]Phase 41 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Terminated(stopped due to One subject enrolled and completed this study. The study was stopped due to poor recruitment.)
A Phase II Trial of Tadalafil in Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Upper Aero Digestive Tract [NCT01697800]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil (2.5mg and 5mg) Administered Once Daily to Men With Erectile Dysfunction [NCT00381732]Phase 3280 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-31Completed
A Clinical Trial of Ambrisentan and Tadalafil in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Associated With Systemic Sclerosis [NCT01042158]Phase 425 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
A Study to Assess the Efficacy of Tadalafil to Treat Erectile Dysfunction After Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer [NCT00122499]Phase 30 participants Interventional2003-02-28Completed
Efficiency of Tadalafil for Management of Female Sexual Dysfunction in Females With Genital Mutilation [NCT05266651]Phase 2/Phase 324 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-10Not yet recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil 20mg for the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction in Chronic Renal Patients in Hemodialysis. [NCT00334477]Phase 260 participants InterventionalNot yet recruiting
Pilot Study to Investigate the Effect of Tadalafil on Secondary Pulmonary Hypertension in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [NCT00506701]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Withdrawn(stopped due to due to lack of finance)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil (5mg and 20mg) Administered Once Daily to Subjects With Mild to Moderate Hypertension [NCT00157326]Phase 2180 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
Low-intensity Shockwaves Therapy Co-administered With Tadalafil 5mg for the Treatment of Severe, Vasculogenic Erectile Dysfunction:Validation of an Evidence Based Protocol in a Randomized, Sham-controlled Trial [NCT03642366]51 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-08-27Recruiting
Tadalafil for the Treatment of Secondary Raynaud's Phenomenon [NCT00822354]10 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
A Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of Tadalafil Administered Once Daily in Japanese and Non-Japanese Subjects With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia [NCT01183650]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
CombinatiON Up-FRON t Therapy for PAH - A Phase 4, Randomized, Multicenter Study of Inhaled Treprostinil in Treatment naïve Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Patients Starting on Tadalafil [NCT01305252]Phase 421 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
A Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group, Multicenter Study To Assess The Duration Of Action, Safety And Toleration Of Differing Doses and Combinations Of Immediate and Modified Release Formulations Of UK-369,003 and Cialis Compared To Placebo I [NCT00174486]Phase 2300 participants Interventional2005-02-28Completed
Tadalafil for Treatment of Priapism in Men With Sickle Cell Anemia [NCT00538564]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Trial closed just prior to study receiving Investigational Review Board approval)
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Design, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil (2.5 mg and 5 mg) Administered Once Daily to Men With Diabetes Mellitus and Erectile Dysfunction [NCT00547183]Phase 3298 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-31Completed
"A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil Administered On Demand to Patients With Erectile Dysfunction" [NCT00547495]Phase 3343 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-31Completed
PHIRST-1: Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Study of the Phosphodiesterase Type 5 (PDE5) Inhibitor Tadalafil in the Treatment in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension [NCT00125918]Phase 3406 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
A Study of LY900010 (LY2452473 + Tadalafil) in the Treatment of Men With Erectile Dysfunction [NCT01160289]Phase 2410 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Completed
Impact of Tadalafil 5 mg on Post-micturition Dribble in Young-age Men With no/Mild Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05146674]80 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-01Not yet recruiting
An Evaluation of Semen Characteristics After 40 Weeks Daily Dosing With 20 mg Tadalafil [NCT00382135]Phase 4282 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-11-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Study of IC351 (LY450190) in Patients With Diabetic Gastroparesis [NCT00050609]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-02-28Completed
"Low-intensity Shockwave Therapy (LiST) for the Treatment of Mild and Mild-to-moderate Vasculogenic Erectile Dysfunction: a Randomized Placebo Controlled Two-parallel Arms Trial, Comparing 6 Sessions, With Daily Tadalafil 5mg vs Placebo" [NCT03641846]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-28Completed
Window of Opportunity Trial of Nivolumab and Tadalafil in Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck [NCT03238365]Early Phase 150 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-10Completed
Prospective, Multicenter, Open-label Study Evaluating the Effects of First-line Oral Combination Therapy of Macitentan and Tadalafil in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (OPTIMA). [NCT02968901]Phase 446 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-01Terminated
Use of a Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitor to Improve Anabolic Resistance in Older Adults [NCT05458232]0 participants (Actual)Observational2023-01-20Withdrawn(stopped due to No subjects enrolled)
A Randomized, Open-label, Single-dose, 2-treatment, 2-way, 2-period Crossover Study to Evaluate the Safety and the Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of DKF-313 in Healthy Male Volunteers [NCT02352311]Phase 154 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
Phase 2 Clinical Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of BZ371A In A Gel Applied in Patients That Performed Radical Prostatectomy [NCT05558007]Phase 272 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-30Recruiting
Phase 3 Randomized Trial of Tadalafil and Glycemic Traits [NCT01444651]Phase 373 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
Effect of Tadalafil on the Quality of Life and Sexual Life in Erectile Dysfunction (ED) Patients Previously Treated With Other Oral ED Therapy [NCT00422578]Phase 4200 participants Interventional2004-10-31Completed
Effect of Tadalafil on Insulin Secretion and Insulin Sensitivity in Obese Men. [NCT02595684]Phase 418 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-31Completed
A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effects of Tadalafil and Dexamethasone Versus Placebo on Pulmonary Edema Formation and Cerebral Blood Flow Autoregulation in High Altitude Newcomers With a Previous History of High Altitude Pulmonary Edema [NCT00274430]Phase 1/Phase 230 participants Interventional2003-07-31Completed
Single-center, Open-label, Single-dose, Two-period, Randomized, Crossover, Phase I Study to Demonstrate Bioequivalence Between a Fixed Dose Combination Product Formulation of Macitentan/Tadalafil (10 mg/40 mg) and the Free Combination of 10 mg Macitentan [NCT03215966]Phase 138 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-07Completed
A Double-Blind Efficacy and Safety Study of the Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitor Tadalafil in Pediatric Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension [NCT01824290]Phase 335 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-05Completed
Perfusion by Arterial Spin Labelling Following Single Dose Tadalafil in Small Vessel Disease (PASTIS) Trial [NCT02450253]Phase 255 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
Evaluation of Retinal and Choriocapillary Vascular Changes Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Patients Undergoing Tadalafil 20mg on Alternative Days for More Than 6 Months: a Single-centre Prospective-control [NCT04491773]54 participants (Actual)Observational2019-11-01Completed
A Phase 2a, Open-Label, Multi-Center Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Marrow Infiltrating Lymphocytes - Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (MILs™ - NSCLC) Alone or in Combination With Nivolumab With or Without Tadalafil in Subjects With Locally Advanced [NCT04069936]Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-15Terminated(stopped due to Resourcing)
Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitor (Tadalafil) Two Weeks Administration Period Effects in Left Ventricle Diastolic Dysfunction and BNP Levels in Resistant Hypertensive Patients [NCT01743911]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Trial of Tadalafil for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy [NCT01865084]Phase 3331 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Terminated(stopped due to The study is being terminated for lack of efficacy)
Phase IV Study on New Insights in Remodeling of Diabetic Cardiomyopathy: Gender Difference in Intramyocardial, Molecular and Neuroendocrine Assessment in Response to Chronic Inhibition of Cyclic GMP Phosphodiesterase 5A [NCT01803828]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
A Randomized, Open-label, Multiple Dosing, 2-way Crossover Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetic Effect of Tamsulosin on Tadalafil in Healthy Male Volunteers [NCT02247518]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
Effect of Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibition With Tadalafil on SystEmic Right VEntricular Size and Function - a Multi-center, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial - SERVE Trial [NCT03049540]Phase 3100 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-25Completed
Comparative Study Between Tadalafil Versus Tamsulosin as a Medical Expulsive Therapy for Lower Ureteric Stones [NCT04641507]Phase 4166 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-01Active, not recruiting
Efficacy of Silodosin, Tadalafil Alone Versus Silodosin Plus Tadalafil as Medical Expulsive Therapy for Lower Ureteric Stones: A Prospective Randomized Placebo Controlled Study [NCT05789732]168 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-03-30Completed
LY2452473 Formulation Exploratory Bioavailability Study [NCT01401543]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-31Completed
Multicenter Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Dapoxetine Combined With Tadalafil in Men With Premature Ejaculation and Concomitant Erectile Dysfunction [NCT04361305]Phase 3150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-03Not yet recruiting
Effectiveness and Tolerability of the On-demand Use of Combined Dapoxetine With Tadalafil and Combined Dapoxetine With Lidocaine 5% Spray in Treatment of Patients With Lifelong Premature Ejaculation and Non-responding to Dapoxetine Alone. [NCT04703127]Phase 360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-03-30Recruiting
Aortic Stenosis and PhosphodiEsterase iNhibition With Aortic Valve Replacement (ASPEN-AVR): A Pilot Study [NCT01272388]Phase 41 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Terminated(stopped due to We designed a different pilot trial based on data obtained after this study started - the 2 studies were too overlapping to continue both.)
The Efficacy and Safety of Initial Triple Versus Initial Dual Oral Combination Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Multi-center, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3b Study [NCT02558231]Phase 3247 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-01Completed
A Study to Determine the Effect of CYP3A Inhibition on the Pharmacokinetics of LY2623091 and the Effect of LY2623091 on the Pharmacokinetics of CYP3A Substrates in Healthy Subjects [NCT02300259]Phase 148 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Design, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil Once-Daily Dosing for 12 Weeks in Men With Signs and Symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Erectile Dysfunc [NCT01937871]Phase 3909 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
Assessment of Serum YKL-40 Level and Platelets Indices Among Patients With Diabetic Erectile Dysfunction [NCT05446493]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-01Completed
A Single Dose Randomized Five-Way Crossover Pharmacokinetics (PK) Study of Tadalafil Semi-Chewable (Gummy) Formulations in Healthy Volunteers [NCT04762082]Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-01Not yet recruiting
A Post-Marketing Clinical Study of LY450190 (Combined With Alpha1 Blocker Treatment) [NCT02431754]Phase 4171 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-30Completed
A Multiple Ascending Dose Study of Tadalafil to Assess the Pharmacokinetics and Safety in a Pediatric Population With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension [NCT01484431]Phase 1/Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-17Completed
Randomized, Double-blind, Two-arms Study With Parallel Groups to Determine the Effect of a Phosphodiesterase Inhibitor for 14 Weeks of Treatment Versus Placebo in Women With FSIAD. [NCT04433559]Phase 380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-08-31Not yet recruiting
Medication Facilitated Ureteral Access Sheath Deployment During Ureteroscopy and Endoscopic-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo Controlled Trial of Tadalafil, Tamsulosin and Combination [NCT03229889]Phase 4220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-06-07Enrolling by invitation
Efficacy of Tadalafil and Solifenacin Versus Tamsulosin and Solifenacin Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Overactive Bladder: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05494567]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-08Active, not recruiting
Hookah Smoking, Carbon Monoxide, and Coronary Endothelial Function [NCT03166787]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-15Terminated(stopped due to Due to the Pandemic and the nature of this study we decided to terminate this study.)
The Effect of Sildenafil and Tadalafil on Skeletal Muscle and Perceptual Fatigue. [NCT01661595]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
Endocan Level in Patients With Erectile Dysfunction and Relationship With Tadalafil Treatment [NCT05109377]90 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-24Recruiting
Administration of an Oral PDE5 Inhibitor, Tadalafil in Conjunction With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients With Multiple Myeloma [NCT01374217]Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Terminated(stopped due to early stopping rule)
Population Pharmacokinetics and Dosage Individualization of Bosentan, Sildenafil and Tadalafil in Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn [NCT04379180]500 participants (Anticipated)Observational2020-04-26Not yet recruiting
Comparison Between Tamsulosin and Tadalafil in Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia A Randomised Trial [NCT05818670]Phase 4160 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-11Completed
Daily Oral L-arginine Plus Tadalafil in Diabetic Patients With Erectile Dysfunction: A Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT03834610]108 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-01Completed
A Phase IB Study to Use Tadalafil to Overcome Immunosuppression During Chemoradiotherapy for IDH-wildtype Grade III-IV Astrocytoma [NCT04757662]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-05-14Completed
A Randomized, Open-label, Multiple Dosing, 2-way Crossover Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetic Effect of Tadalafil on Tamsulosin in Healthy Male Volunteers [NCT02247505]Phase 129 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
Comparative Study Between Fixed Dose Monotherapy (Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors or Alpha Blockers) Versus Combined Therapy in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms [NCT05236634]120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-01Not yet recruiting
Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibition With Tadalafil Changes Outcomes in Heart Failure [NCT01910389]Phase 323 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-30Terminated(stopped due to terminated by funding agency)
Tadalafil for Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Lung Disease [NCT01862536]Phase 244 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-01Completed
Define in Preclinical Systolic Dysfunction (PSD) With Renal Dysfunction, the Cardiorenal and Humoral Actions of Chronic Type V Phosphodiesterase (PDEV) Inhibition [NCT01970176]Phase 1/Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-09Completed
An Evaluation of Tadalafil and Sildenafil Treatment in Men With Erectile Dysfunction in China [NCT01352507]Phase 4383 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
Effects of Single Dose Tadalafil on Urethral and Anal Closure Function and on Urinary Flow in Healthy Females: A Randomised, Controlled, Double-blinded, Two-period Cross-over Study [NCT05095077]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-08-01Completed
Postmarketing Surveillance Study: A Randomized, Open-Label, 3-Month Interventional Study of Tadalafil Effectiveness (2.5 mg and 5 mg) and Long-Term Safety Administered Once Daily in Chinese Men With Erectile Dysfunction [NCT02224846]Phase 4635 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Completed
A Single-center, Open-label, Single-dose, Randomized, 3-way Crossover Phase 1 Study in Healthy Adult Participants to Assess the Bioequivalence of the Combination of Macitentan/Tadalafil (10 mg/20 mg) Administered as a Fixed Dose Combination Formulation Co [NCT05236231]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-02-04Completed
A Multicenter Observational Pilot Study on the Use of Tadalafil Delivra Cream in the Treatment of Raynaud's Phenomenon and Pain Associated With Digital Ulcers [NCT03393325]0 participants (Actual)Observational2018-10-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Sponsor decision. The study is not anticipated to start)
Aortic Stenosis and PhosphodiEsterase Type 5 iNhibition (ASPEN): A Pilot Study [NCT01275339]Phase 410 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Difficulty enrolling patients and PI moved institutions.)
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded, Parallel, Phase 2a Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of LY2623091 in Patients With Primary Hypertension [NCT02194465]Phase 2304 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00384930 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS): Supportive Analysis
NCT00384930 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index (BII)
NCT00384930 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) EF Domain
NCT00384930 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) (Irritative) Subscore
NCT00384930 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Quality of Life (QoL) Index
NCT00384930 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Question 7 (Nocturia)
NCT00384930 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore
NCT00384930 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS): Primary Analysis
NCT00384930 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Peak Urinary Flow
NCT00384930 (10) [back to overview]"Number of Participants Who Answer Yes to the Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) Global Assessment Question (LUTS-GAQ)"
NCT00386009 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVRcath) Measured During Free-Flow Studies
NCT00386009 (17) [back to overview]Clinically Adverse and Statistically Significant Changes From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Laboratory Tests
NCT00386009 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Bladder Contractility Index (BCI) Measured During Pressure-Flow Studies
NCT00386009 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Bladder Outlet Obstruction Index (BOOI) Measured During Pressure-Flow Studies
NCT00386009 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Bladder Voiding Efficiency (BVE) Measured During Free-Flow Studies
NCT00386009 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Bladder Volume at First Involuntary Detrusor Contraction
NCT00386009 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Detrusor Pressure at Peak Urinary Flow Rate (PdetQmax)
NCT00386009 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Total Score
NCT00386009 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Maximum Detrusor Pressure (Max Pdet) Measured During Pressure-Flow Studies
NCT00386009 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Mean Urinary Flow Rate (Qave) Measured During Free-Flow Studies
NCT00386009 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Mean Urinary Flow Rate (Qave) Measured During Pressure-Flow Studies
NCT00386009 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Peak Urinary Flow Rate (Qmax) Measured During Free-Flow Studies
NCT00386009 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Peak Urinary Flow Rate (Qmax) Measured During Pressure-Flow Studies
NCT00386009 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Total Bladder Capacity Measured During Free-Flow Studies
NCT00386009 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Volume of Voided Urine (Vcomp) Measured During Free-Flow Studies
NCT00386009 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Volume of Voided Urine (Vcomp) Measured During Pressure-Flow Studies
NCT00386009 (17) [back to overview]Presence of Involuntary Detrusor Contractions During Bladder Filling
NCT00422734 (14) [back to overview]Improvement in the Sexual Quality of Life in the Subject and His Study Partner as Measured by the Sexual Quality of Life (SQoL) Domain of the Sexual Life Quality Questionnaire (SLQQ)
NCT00422734 (14) [back to overview]Sexual Life Quality Questionnaire (SLQQ) Treatment Satisfaction Domain
NCT00422734 (14) [back to overview]"Percent of Subjects With Yes Responses to Global Assessment Questionnaire (GAQ) - Subject Response"
NCT00422734 (14) [back to overview]"Percent of Partners With Yes Responses to Global Assessment Questionnaire (GAQ) - Partner Response"
NCT00422734 (14) [back to overview]"Change From Baseline to Endpoint in the Percent of Yes Responses to Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary Questions 2 (SEP2) and 3 (SEP3)."
NCT00422734 (14) [back to overview]"Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Percent of Yes Responses to Partner-Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Questions 1 and 2 - Partner Response"
NCT00422734 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 Endpoint in the International Index of Erectile Function - Intercourse Satisfaction Domain - Subject Response
NCT00422734 (14) [back to overview]"Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Percent of Yes Responses to Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Questions 4 and 5 - Subject Response"
NCT00422734 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Endpoint in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)- Erectile Function Domain Score (Sum of IIEF Questions 1-5 and 15)
NCT00422734 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in the Satisfaction Domain of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) - Partner Response
NCT00422734 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Overall Satisfaction Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-OS) - Subject Response
NCT00422734 (14) [back to overview]"Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Percent of Yes Responses to Partner-Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 3 - Partner Response"
NCT00422734 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in the Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) Questionnaire
NCT00422734 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in the Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) Questionnaire - Confidence Domain Subscales
NCT00540124 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Uroflowmetry Parameters - Peak Urine Flow Rate (Qmax) and Mean Urine Flow Rate (Qmean)
NCT00540124 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 4, 8, and 12 Week Endpoints in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) - Nocturia Subscore
NCT00540124 (13) [back to overview]Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Combined Categories - Frequencies
NCT00540124 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 4, 8, and 12 Week Endpoints in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) - Obstructive Subscore
NCT00540124 (13) [back to overview]Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Combined Categories - Frequencies
NCT00540124 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 4, 8, and 12 Week Endpoints in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) - Irritative Subscore
NCT00540124 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 4 Week and 8 Week Endpoints in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Total Score
NCT00540124 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Voids With Terminal Micturition Dribble and Post Micturition Dribble Per Week Based on Median as Reported by Patient Voiding Dribble Diary
NCT00540124 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Uroflowmetry Parameters - Voided Urine Volume (Vcomp)
NCT00540124 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Total, Waking, and Sleeping Voids (Average Number Per Week) Based on Median as Reported in Patient Voiding Dribble Diary
NCT00540124 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Total Urinary Incontinence Episodes Per Week Based on Median as Reported in Patient Voiding Dribble Diary
NCT00540124 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Total Score
NCT00540124 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index (BPH-II)
NCT00549302 (4) [back to overview]Probability of No Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) Deterioration at Weeks 16, 28, 40 and up to 52
NCT00549302 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT00549302 (4) [back to overview]6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) at Baseline and Weeks 16, 28, 40 and 52
NCT00549302 (4) [back to overview]Borg Dyspnea Assessment at Baseline and Weeks 16, 28, 40 and 52
NCT00617305 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Log-transformed N-terminal Pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) Measured at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 48 (LOCF)
NCT00617305 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Pulmonary Artery Pressure (mPAP) (LOCF)
NCT00617305 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Right Atrial Pressure (mRAP) (LOCF)
NCT00617305 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR), Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
NCT00617305 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Six Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) Measured at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 48 (LOCF)
NCT00617305 (11) [back to overview]Overall Survival, Evaluated at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and After Week 48
NCT00617305 (11) [back to overview]Time to Clinical Worsening of PAH, Evaluated at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and After Week 48
NCT00617305 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cardiac Output (LOCF)
NCT00617305 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review (CAMPHOR) Quality of Life (QOL) Survey Overall Score Measured at Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48 (LOCF)
NCT00617305 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in World Health Organization (WHO) Functional Class (LOCF) Measured at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 48.
NCT00617305 (11) [back to overview]Change in Dyspnea Index Measured at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 48 (LOCF)
NCT00734604 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Endpoint in the Intercourse Satisfaction (IS) Domain of the IIEF
NCT00734604 (15) [back to overview]"Question 4 I Felt Like a Whole Man Score of the Patient Perception and Feelings Questions (PPF-Q) at Endpoint"
NCT00734604 (15) [back to overview]"Question 2 I Felt in Control of my Sex Life Score of the Patient Perception and Feelings Questions (PPF-Q) at Endpoint"
NCT00734604 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Endpoint in the Overall Satisfaction (OS) Domain of the IIEF
NCT00734604 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline Between Tadalafil Once a Day (OaD) and Tadalafil as Needed (PRN) in Sexual Self-Confidence Domain of Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales (PAIRS)
NCT00734604 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline Between Tadalafil Once a Day (OaD) and Sildenafil as Needed (PRN) in Sexual Self-Confidence Domain of Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales (PAIRS)
NCT00734604 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants With at Least One Serious Adverse Event
NCT00734604 (15) [back to overview]"Question 3 I Felt the Drug Was in Control of my Erections Score of the Patient Perception and Feelings Questions (PPF-Q) at Endpoint"
NCT00734604 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Endpoint in the Time Concerns Domain of PAIRS
NCT00734604 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Endpoint in the Erectile Function Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)
NCT00734604 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Endpoint in the Spontaneity Domain of PAIRS
NCT00734604 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Endpoint in the Self-Esteem And Relationship (SEAR) Questionnaire Transformed Total Score
NCT00734604 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Endpoint in the Proportion of Days With at Least One Morning Erection
NCT00734604 (15) [back to overview]Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) Score at Endpoint
NCT00734604 (15) [back to overview]"Question 1 I Felt as if I Did Not Have ED Score of the Patient Perception and Feelings Questions (PPF-Q) at Endpoint"
NCT00750308 (2) [back to overview]Beta Cell Function
NCT00750308 (2) [back to overview]Insulin Sensitivity
NCT00783094 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR) at 54-Week Endpoint
NCT00783094 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR) at 12-Week Endpoint
NCT00783094 (23) [back to overview]Tadalafil Pharmacokinetics in Japanese Men: Plasma Concentration Measurement
NCT00783094 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events During 42 Weeks of Open-Label Treatment
NCT00783094 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events During 12 Weeks of the Study
NCT00783094 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure During at 54-Week Endpoint
NCT00783094 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure at 12-Week Endpoint
NCT00783094 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Uroflowmetry Parameter: Peak Flow Rate (Qmax) at 12-Week Endpoint
NCT00783094 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Total Score at 54-Week Endpoint
NCT00783094 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Sitting Heart Rate at 54-Week Endpoint
NCT00783094 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) at 12-Week Endpoint
NCT00783094 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in IPSS Quality of Life (QoL) Index at 54-Week Endpoint
NCT00783094 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in IPSS Quality of Life (QoL) Index at 12-Week Endpoint
NCT00783094 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore at 54-Week Endpoint
NCT00783094 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore at 12-Week Endpoint
NCT00783094 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Total Score at 12-Week Endpoint
NCT00783094 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Storage (Irritative) Subscore at 54-Week Endpoint
NCT00783094 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Storage (Irritative) Subscore at 12-Week Endpoint
NCT00783094 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) at 54-Week Endpoint
NCT00783094 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Sitting Heart Rate at 12-Week Endpoint
NCT00783094 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Uroflowmetry Parameter: Peak Flow Rate (Qmax) at 54-Week Endpoint
NCT00783094 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) at 54-Week Endpoint
NCT00783094 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) at 12-Week Endpoint
NCT00822354 (6) [back to overview]Raynaud's Condition Score (RCS) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
NCT00822354 (6) [back to overview]Raynaud Severity Visual Analog Score (VAS)
NCT00822354 (6) [back to overview]Number of Raynaud's Phenomenon Attacks Per Day
NCT00822354 (6) [back to overview]Duration of Raynaud's Phenomenon Attacks
NCT00822354 (6) [back to overview]Digital Blood Pressure
NCT00822354 (6) [back to overview]Capillary Diameter
NCT00827242 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks, International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)- Erectile Function (EF) Domain Scores
NCT00827242 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks, Postvoid Residual (PVR) Volume
NCT00827242 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks, Peak Flow Rate (Qmax) by Uroflowmetry
NCT00827242 (16) [back to overview]Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I), Number of Participants in 7 Response Categories
NCT00827242 (16) [back to overview]Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I), Number of Participants in 7 Response Categories
NCT00827242 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)
NCT00827242 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Nocturia Question
NCT00827242 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Storage (Irritative) Subscore
NCT00827242 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks, Mean Flow Rate (Qmean) by Uroflowmetry
NCT00827242 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore
NCT00827242 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Quality of Life (QoL) Index
NCT00827242 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Impact Index
NCT00827242 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks, Voided Volume (Vcomp) by Uroflowmetry
NCT00827242 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 4 Weeks, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Impact Index
NCT00827242 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 4 Weeks, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)
NCT00827242 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 1 Week, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)
NCT00833638 (12) [back to overview]Sexual Encounter Profile Diary Question Number 1, Change From Baseline to Post Baseline During the Double-blind Period in Percentage of Yes Responses
NCT00833638 (12) [back to overview]Sexual Encounter Profile Diary Question Number 2, Change From Baseline to Post Baseline During the Double-blind Period in Percentage of Yes Responses
NCT00833638 (12) [back to overview]Sexual Encounter Profile Diary Question Number 3, Change From Baseline to Post Baseline During the Double-blind Period in Percentage of Yes Responses
NCT00833638 (12) [back to overview]Sexual Encounter Profile Diary Question Number 4, Change From Baseline to Post Baseline During the Double-blind Period in Percentage of Yes Responses
NCT00833638 (12) [back to overview]Earliest Onset Day Measured by Cumulative Percentage of Participants With Yes Response to Sexual Encounter Profile Diary Question 3
NCT00833638 (12) [back to overview]Sexual Encounter Profile Diary Question 3, Daily Cumulative Percentage of Successful Intercourse Attempts
NCT00833638 (12) [back to overview]Sexual Encounter Profile Diary Question Number 5, Change From Baseline to Post Baseline During the Double-blind Period in Percentage of Yes Responses
NCT00833638 (12) [back to overview]Sexual Encounter Profile Diary Question 3, Percentages of Yes Responses in the Double-blind Period and the Open-label Period for Participants Who Were Assigned to Tadalafil 5 mg in the Double-blind Treatment Period
NCT00833638 (12) [back to overview]Sexual Encounter Profile Diary Question 3, Percentages of Yes Responses in the Double-blind Period and the Open-label Period for Participants Who Were Assigned to Tadalafil 2.5 mg in the Double-blind Treatment Period
NCT00833638 (12) [back to overview]Sexual Encounter Profile Diary Question 3, Percentages of Yes Responses During the Double-blind and Open-label Periods for Participants Who Were Assigned to Placebo in the Double-blind Treatment Period
NCT00833638 (12) [back to overview]Sexual Encounter Profile Diary Question 3, Percentages of Yes Responses During the Double-blind Period and the Open-label Period for Participants Who Didn't Respond to Tadalafil 2.5 mg During Double-blind Period
NCT00833638 (12) [back to overview]Sexual Encounter Profile Diary Question 3, the Overall Distribution of Time to Onset by Yes Responses
NCT00836693 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Total and Subdomain Scores of the Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) Questionnaire
NCT00836693 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Nocturnal Penile Tumescence (NPT) Pattern: Percentage Volumetric Change
NCT00836693 (18) [back to overview]The Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) Questionnaire at 12 Week Endpoint
NCT00836693 (18) [back to overview]"Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 1 Percentage of Yes Responses"
NCT00836693 (18) [back to overview]"Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 4 Percentage of Yes Responses"
NCT00836693 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in the Frequency of Spontaneous Morning Erections Captured by Patient Diary
NCT00836693 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Nocturnal Penile Tumescence (NPT) Pattern: Number of Erectile Events Per Night
NCT00836693 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Nocturnal Penile Tumescence (NPT) Pattern: Duration of Erectile Events Per Night
NCT00836693 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Sexual Desire (SD)
NCT00836693 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Overall Satisfaction (OS)
NCT00836693 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Orgasmic Functions (OF)
NCT00836693 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Intercourse Satisfaction (IS)
NCT00836693 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) at Week 12
NCT00836693 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Question 2 of the Patient Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary at Week 12 in Percentage of Yes Responses
NCT00836693 (18) [back to overview]Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary, Question 3 Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Yes Responses
NCT00836693 (18) [back to overview]"Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 5 Percentage of Yes Responses"
NCT00836693 (18) [back to overview]Global Assessment Question (GAQ) Question 2 at 12 Week Endpoint
NCT00836693 (18) [back to overview]Global Assessment Question (GAQ) Question 1 at 12 Week Endpoint
NCT00843635 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events
NCT00843635 (4) [back to overview]Ratio of MDSC Concentration in the Blood
NCT00843635 (4) [back to overview]Ratio of T-reg Cell Concentration in the Blood
NCT00843635 (4) [back to overview]Ratio of Tumor-specific T-cell Concentration in the Blood
NCT00848081 (5) [back to overview]International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Change From Baseline
NCT00848081 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Positive Orthostatic Vital Signs Test; Shift From Any Pre-Randomization to Any Post-Randomization Visit
NCT00848081 (5) [back to overview]Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR) Change From Baseline
NCT00848081 (5) [back to overview]Uroflowmetry (Qmax) Change From Baseline
NCT00848081 (5) [back to overview]Number of Men With Treatment-emergent Dizziness
NCT00855582 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function - Overall Satisfaction Domain at Week 12 Endpoint
NCT00855582 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score Nocturia Question at Week 12
NCT00855582 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Uroflowmetry Parameters - Peak Urine Flow Rate (Qmax) at Week 12 Endpoint
NCT00855582 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function Question 3 at Week 12 Endpoint
NCT00855582 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function - Intercourse Satisfaction Domain at Week 12 Endpoint
NCT00855582 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) Domain Score at Week 12 Endpoint (5 mg)
NCT00855582 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary Question 5
NCT00855582 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary Question 4 at Week 12 Endpoint
NCT00855582 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function Question 4 at Week 12 Endpoint
NCT00855582 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary Question 3 at Week 12 Endpoint (5 mg)
NCT00855582 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary Question 2 at Week 12 Endpoint
NCT00855582 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Uroflowmetry Parameters - Voided Volume (Vcomp) at Week 12 Endpoint
NCT00855582 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) Domain Score at Week 12 Endpoint (2.5 mg)
NCT00855582 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in BPH Impact Index (BII) at Week 12 Endpoint (2.5 mg)
NCT00855582 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Impact Index (BII) at Week 12 Endpoint (5 mg)
NCT00855582 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary Question 3 at Week 12 Endpoint (2.5 mg)
NCT00855582 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) Domain at Week 4 and Week 8 Endpoint
NCT00855582 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Uroflowmetry Parameters - Mean Urine Flow Rate (Qmean) at Week 12 Endpoint
NCT00855582 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 12 Endpoint (5 mg)
NCT00855582 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 12 Endpoint (2.5 mg)
NCT00855582 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Modified IPSS (mIPSS) at Week 2 Endpoint
NCT00855582 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore at Week 12 Endpoint
NCT00855582 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score Storage (Irritative) Subscore at Week 12 Endpoint
NCT00855582 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score Quality of Life (QoL) at Week 12 Endpoint
NCT00855582 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in BPH Impact Index (BII) at Week 4 and 8 Endpoint
NCT00855582 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 4 and Week 8 Endpoint
NCT00855582 (30) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary Question 3 at Week 4 and Week 8 Endpoint
NCT00855582 (30) [back to overview]Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12 Endpoint
NCT00855582 (30) [back to overview]Erectile Function General Assessment Questionnaire (EF-GAQ)
NCT00855582 (30) [back to overview]Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12 Endpoint
NCT00861757 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Subscore (Storage [Irritative] and Voiding [Obstructive])
NCT00861757 (12) [back to overview]Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12
NCT00861757 (12) [back to overview]Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12
NCT00861757 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (PBH) Impact Index (BII) at 12 Weeks
NCT00861757 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure (Sitting) at 12 Weeks
NCT00861757 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Quality of Life (QoL) at 12 Weeks
NCT00861757 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 12 Weeks
NCT00861757 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR) at 12 Weeks
NCT00861757 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) at 12 Weeks
NCT00861757 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Sitting Heart Rate (HR) at 12 Weeks
NCT00861757 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Uroflowmetry Parameter: Peak Flow Rate (Qmax) at 12 Weeks
NCT00861757 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure (Standing) at 12 Weeks
NCT00894413 (1) [back to overview]Change in Immune Response After Tadalafil Administration
NCT00931528 (7) [back to overview]Overall Sexual Function as Measured by Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)
NCT00931528 (7) [back to overview]Partner Marital Adjustment as Measured by the Locke's Marital Adjustment Test
NCT00931528 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Maintaining Spontaneous (Off-drug) Erectile Function (EF) at Weeks 28-30 After Initiation of Radiation Therapy (RT)
NCT00931528 (7) [back to overview]Patient Marital Adjustment as Measured by the Locke's Marital Adjustment Test
NCT00931528 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Maintaining Spontaneous (Off-drug) EF at Years 1 and 2 After Initiation of RT
NCT00931528 (7) [back to overview]Overall Patient Sexual Satisfaction as Measured by Change From Baseline in the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire (SAQ) Score
NCT00931528 (7) [back to overview]Overall Partner Sexual Satisfaction as Measured by Change From Baseline in the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire-Partner (SAQ-P) Score
NCT00970632 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Modified International Prostate Symptom Score (mIPSS) at 1 Week
NCT00970632 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Peak Urine Flow Rate (Q-Max) at 12 Weeks
NCT00970632 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR) at 12 Weeks
NCT00970632 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 12 Weeks
NCT00970632 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 4 Weeks
NCT00970632 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Volume of Voided Urine (V-Comp) at 12 Weeks
NCT00970632 (17) [back to overview]Treatment Satisfaction Scale - Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (TSS-BPH) at 12 Weeks: Overall
NCT00970632 (17) [back to overview]Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at 12 Weeks
NCT00970632 (17) [back to overview]Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at 12 Weeks
NCT00970632 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index (BII) at 12 Weeks
NCT00970632 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Erectile Function (EF) Domain at 12 Weeks
NCT00970632 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Nocturia Question at 12 Weeks
NCT00970632 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Quality of Life (QoL) Index at 12 Weeks
NCT00970632 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Storage (Irritative) Subscore at 12 Weeks
NCT00970632 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index (BII) at 4 Weeks
NCT00970632 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore at 12 Weeks.
NCT00970632 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Urine Flow Rate (Q-Mean) at 12 Weeks
NCT01026818 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 'Yes' Answers to Morning Erections
NCT01026818 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Score of Greater Than or Equal to 22 in the International Index of Erectile Function- Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) Domain
NCT01026818 (23) [back to overview]Residual Erectile Function (REF) at Month 10.5
NCT01026818 (23) [back to overview]Residual Erectile Function (REF) at Month 13.5
NCT01026818 (23) [back to overview]Residual Erectile Function (REF) at Month 2
NCT01026818 (23) [back to overview]Residual Erectile Function (REF) at Month 5
NCT01026818 (23) [back to overview]Residual Erectile Function (REF) at Month 9
NCT01026818 (23) [back to overview]Standardized Morning Erections Question (SMEQ) Score at Month 13.5
NCT01026818 (23) [back to overview]Standardized Morning Erections Question (SMEQ) Score at Month 2
NCT01026818 (23) [back to overview]Standardized Morning Erections Question (SMEQ) Score at Month 9
NCT01026818 (23) [back to overview]Residual Erectile Function (REF) at Baseline
NCT01026818 (23) [back to overview]Global Assessment Questions (GAQ) Question 1 at Month 9
NCT01026818 (23) [back to overview]Global Assessment Question (GAQ) Question 2 at Month 9
NCT01026818 (23) [back to overview]Global Assessment Question (GAQ) Question 2 at Month 13.5
NCT01026818 (23) [back to overview]Global Assessment Question (GAQ) Question 1 at Month 13.5
NCT01026818 (23) [back to overview]Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) Questionnaire Mean Score
NCT01026818 (23) [back to overview]Change in Penile Length and Girth
NCT01026818 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Endpoint in the International Index of Erectile Function- Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) Total Score
NCT01026818 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Endpoint in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Domains (Intercourse Satisfaction Domain, Orgasmic Function Domain, Sexual Desire Domain, Overall Satisfaction Domain)
NCT01026818 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Self Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) Questionnaire Score
NCT01026818 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 26-item Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) Questionnaire Score
NCT01026818 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 'Yes' Answers to Questions 1 to 5 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP)
NCT01026818 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Score of Greater Than or Equal to 22 in the Erectile Function (EF) Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Questionnaire
NCT01042158 (4) [back to overview]6-minute Walk Distance
NCT01042158 (4) [back to overview]Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR)
NCT01042158 (4) [back to overview]Right Ventricular (RV) Mass
NCT01042158 (4) [back to overview]Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (TAPSE)
NCT01122264 (18) [back to overview]Reasons for Discontinuation of Randomized Erectile Dysfunction Treatment
NCT01122264 (18) [back to overview]Patterns of Erectile Dysfunction Treatment Change
NCT01122264 (18) [back to overview]Global Assessment Questions (GAQ)
NCT01122264 (18) [back to overview]Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) Questionnaire at 4, 8, 16, and 24 Weeks
NCT01122264 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 4, 8, 16, and 24 Weeks of the Sexual Relationship Domain of the Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) Questionnaire
NCT01122264 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 4, 8, 16, and 24 Weeks of the Self Esteem Domain of the Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) Questionnaire
NCT01122264 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 4, 8, 16, and 24 Weeks of the Overall Relationship Domain of the Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) Questionnaire
NCT01122264 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 4, 8, 16 and 24 Weeks of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP)
NCT01122264 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 4, 8, 16 and 24 Weeks of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Sexual Desire Domain
NCT01122264 (18) [back to overview]Time to Discontinuation of Randomized Treatment
NCT01122264 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 4, 8, 16 and 24 Weeks of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Overall Satisfaction Domain
NCT01122264 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 4, 8, 16 and 24 Weeks of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Orgasmic Function Domain
NCT01122264 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 4, 8, 16, and 24 Weeks of the Confidence Domain of the Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) Questionnaire
NCT01122264 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 4, 8, 16 and 24 Weeks of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Intercourse Satisfaction Domain
NCT01122264 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 4, 8, 16 and 24 Weeks of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Erectile Function (EF) Domain
NCT01122264 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 24 Week Endpoint of the Sexual Self-Confidence, Spontaneity, and Time Concerns Domains (23-items) of the Psychological and Interpersonal Relationships Scale (PAIRS)
NCT01122264 (18) [back to overview]Number of Days From the 8-Week Study Visit to the Time the Participant Discontinues From All Phosphodiesterase Type 5 (PDE5) Inhibitor Treatments
NCT01122264 (18) [back to overview]Number of Treatment Switches
NCT01130532 (13) [back to overview]Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS) - Partner Satisfaction With Medication Score at Week 12 Endpoint
NCT01130532 (13) [back to overview]Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS) - Patient Satisfaction With Medication Score at Week 12 Endpoint
NCT01130532 (13) [back to overview]"Change From Baseline to 12-Week in Percentage of Yes Responses to Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Questions 1-5"
NCT01130532 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12-Week Endpoint in the International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) Domain Score
NCT01130532 (13) [back to overview]Change From 12 Weeks to 16 Weeks in Participant's International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) Domain Score
NCT01130532 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12-Week Endpoint in Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS) - Partner
NCT01130532 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12-Week Endpoint in Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS) - Patient
NCT01130532 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12-Week Endpoint in the International Index of Erectile Function - Intercourse Satisfaction (IIEF-IS) Domain Score
NCT01130532 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12-Week Endpoint in the International Index of Erectile Function - Overall Satisfaction (IIEF-OS) Domain Score
NCT01130532 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12-Week Endpoint in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Question 15 (Sexual Confidence)
NCT01130532 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Having an International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) Domain Score Greater Than or Equal to 26 Through 12-Week Endpoint (Double-Blind Treatment Period)
NCT01130532 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Having International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) Domain Score Greater Than or Equal to 26 From 12 to 16 Weeks
NCT01130532 (13) [back to overview]"Change From Week 12 to Week 16 Percentage of Yes Responses to Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Questions 3"
NCT01131104 (1) [back to overview]30-Day Person Time Analysis Risk of NAION Associated With PDE5 Inhibitor Use
NCT01139762 (14) [back to overview]Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at 26 Weeks
NCT01139762 (14) [back to overview]Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at 26 Weeks
NCT01139762 (14) [back to overview]Change in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) From Baseline to 4 and 26 Weeks
NCT01139762 (14) [back to overview]Change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Subscores Index From Baseline to 4, 12, and 26 Weeks
NCT01139762 (14) [back to overview]Change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Quality of Life Index From Baseline to 4, 12, and 26 Weeks
NCT01139762 (14) [back to overview]Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Question 3 and 4 Scores From Baseline to 4, 12, and 26 Weeks
NCT01139762 (14) [back to overview]Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) - Sexual Desire Domain Scores From Baseline to 4, 12, and 26 Weeks
NCT01139762 (14) [back to overview]Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) - Overall Satisfaction Domain Scores From Baseline to 4, 12, and 26 Weeks
NCT01139762 (14) [back to overview]Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) - Orgasmic Function Domain Scores From Baseline to 4, 12, and 26 Weeks
NCT01139762 (14) [back to overview]Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) - Intercourse Satisfaction Domain Scores From Baseline to 4, 12, and 26 Weeks
NCT01139762 (14) [back to overview]Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) - Erectile Function Domain Scores From Baseline to 4, 12, and 26 Weeks
NCT01139762 (14) [back to overview]Treatment Satisfaction Scale - Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (TSS-BPH) at 26 Weeks
NCT01139762 (14) [back to overview]Change in Post Void Residual (PVR) Volume From Baseline to 26 Weeks
NCT01139762 (14) [back to overview]Change in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) From Baseline to 12 Weeks
NCT01152190 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 4 and 8 Weeks in Arterial Resistive Index (RI) in the Prostate Peripheral Zone and Bladder Neck
NCT01152190 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 8-Week Endpoint in Arterial Resistive Index (RI) in the Prostate Transition Zone
NCT01152190 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 4-Week Endpoint in Arterial Resistive Index (RI) in the Prostate Transition Zone
NCT01152190 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 4 and 8 Weeks in Color Pixel Intensity (CPI) in the Prostate Transition Zone, Peripheral Zone, and Bladder Neck
NCT01160289 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Total Cholesterol and Triglycerides
NCT01160289 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)
NCT01160289 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in IIEF EF Domain Score Reported by Testosterone Concentration Subgroups
NCT01160289 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in IIEF Domain Scores (Intercourse Satisfaction, Orgasmic Function, Sexual Desire, and Overall Satisfaction)
NCT01160289 (10) [back to overview]"Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in the Percentage of Yes Responses on the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary"
NCT01160289 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)
NCT01160289 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Fasting Insulin
NCT01160289 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Erectile Function (EF) Domain Score
NCT01160289 (10) [back to overview]25)"-NCT01160289">"Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in the Percentage of Participants Who Return to Normal on the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Scale (EF>25)"
NCT01160289 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Fasting Glucose
NCT01178073 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Borg Dyspnea Index at Week 24
NCT01178073 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With First Adjudicated Clinical Failure (CF) Event, Death, Hospitalisation for Worsening PAH, Disease Progression, Unsatisfactory Long-term Clinical Response, All Through FAV
NCT01178073 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Satisfactory Clinical Response at Week 24
NCT01178073 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the 6 Minute Walk Distance Test at Week 24
NCT01178073 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the World Health Organization Functional Class at Week 24
NCT01178073 (6) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in the N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide at Week 24
NCT01183650 (3) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Curve (AUC) for Tadalafil and Metabolite IC710
NCT01183650 (3) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Concentration Maximum (Cmax) of Tadalafil and Metabolite IC710
NCT01183650 (3) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Time to Concentration Maximum (Tmax) of Tadalafil and Metabolite IC710
NCT01266265 (1) [back to overview]Prevalence of Respiratory Tract-Related Adverse Events of Interest
NCT01272388 (2) [back to overview]6 Minute Walk Distance
NCT01272388 (2) [back to overview]Quality of Life as Assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
NCT01275339 (1) [back to overview]Diastolic Function as Measured by Tissue Doppler e'
NCT01305252 (5) [back to overview]Change in NYHA/WHO Class
NCT01305252 (5) [back to overview]Change in Right Ventricular Ejection Fraction
NCT01305252 (5) [back to overview]N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP)
NCT01305252 (5) [back to overview]B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP)
NCT01305252 (5) [back to overview]6 Minute Walk Distance
NCT01324999 (8) [back to overview]Short Form-36 Global Score
NCT01324999 (8) [back to overview]Resting Oxygen Saturation
NCT01324999 (8) [back to overview]Oxygen Desaturation During 6 Minute Walk Test
NCT01324999 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Change in WHO Functional Class (WHO FC)
NCT01324999 (8) [back to overview]Maximum Borg Dyspnea Score During 6 Minute Walk Test
NCT01324999 (8) [back to overview]Brain Natriuretic Peptide Level
NCT01324999 (8) [back to overview]St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Score
NCT01324999 (8) [back to overview]6 Minute Walk Distance
NCT01352507 (13) [back to overview]Change in PAIRS Spontaneity Domain
NCT01352507 (13) [back to overview]Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Erectile Function Domain
NCT01352507 (13) [back to overview]Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Intercourse Satisfaction Domain
NCT01352507 (13) [back to overview]Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Orgasmic Function Domain
NCT01352507 (13) [back to overview]Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Overall Satisfaction Domain
NCT01352507 (13) [back to overview]Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Sexual Desire Domain
NCT01352507 (13) [back to overview]"Percentage of Participants Preferring Tadalafil Over Sildenafil Measured at Week 18 Using Question 1 of the Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitor Treatment Preference Questionnaire (PITPQ)"
NCT01352507 (13) [back to overview]Change in PAIRS Time Concerns Domain
NCT01352507 (13) [back to overview]Change in Psychosocial and Interpersonal Relationship Scale (PAIRS) Sexual Self-Confidence Domain
NCT01352507 (13) [back to overview]Change in Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 2
NCT01352507 (13) [back to overview]Change in Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 3
NCT01352507 (13) [back to overview]Drug Attributes Questionnaire (DRAQ) at Week 18
NCT01352507 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Moderately or Strongly Preferring the Selected Treatment at Week 18 Using Question 2 of the PITPQ
NCT01374217 (4) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT01374217 (4) [back to overview]Response Rate
NCT01374217 (4) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT01374217 (4) [back to overview]Quality of Life Scores
NCT01401543 (4) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity [AUC(0-∞)] of LY2452473
NCT01401543 (4) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: AUC(0-∞) of Tadalafil
NCT01401543 (4) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Cmax of Tadalafil
NCT01401543 (4) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of LY2452473
NCT01444651 (6) [back to overview]Change in Insulin Resistance From Baseline to 3 Months, as Measured by HOMA-IR
NCT01444651 (6) [back to overview]Baseline to 3 Month Change in Composite of Insulin Resistance and Sensitivity, as Measured by the Oral Disposition Index
NCT01444651 (6) [back to overview]Baseline to 3-month Change in Endothelial Function Measured by EndoPAT
NCT01444651 (6) [back to overview]Baseline to 3-month Change in Insulin Sensitivity, as Measured by the Matsuda Index
NCT01444651 (6) [back to overview]Baseline to 3-month Change in Matsuda Disposition Index
NCT01444651 (6) [back to overview]Insulinogenic Index
NCT01460342 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Score of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 12 Weeks
NCT01460342 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Quality of Life (QoL) Index
NCT01460342 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Storage (Irritative) Subscore
NCT01460342 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore
NCT01460342 (8) [back to overview]Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Scale at 12 Weeks
NCT01460342 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Score of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)
NCT01460342 (8) [back to overview]Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at 12 Weeks
NCT01460342 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Modified International Prostate Symptom Score (mIPSS) Score at 2 Weeks
NCT01484431 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Palatability of the Tadalafil Suspension
NCT01484431 (4) [back to overview]Population Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Curve Versus Time at a Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUCtau) for Tadalafil
NCT01484431 (4) [back to overview]Population Pharmacokinetics: Average Concentration (Cmean,ss) of for Tadalafil at Steady-State.
NCT01484431 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Clinical Worsening
NCT01544998 (6) [back to overview]Change in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at 60 Minutes for Preclinical Diastolic Dysfunction (PDD) Reporting Group
NCT01544998 (6) [back to overview]Change in Natriuresis (Urinary Sodium Excretion) at 60 Minutes for Preclinical Systolic Dysfunction (PSD) Reporting Group
NCT01544998 (6) [back to overview]Change in Natriuresis (Urinary Sodium Excretion) at 60 Minutes for Preclinical Diastolic Dysfunction (PDD) Reporting Group
NCT01544998 (6) [back to overview]Change in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at 60 Minutes for Preclinical Systolic Dysfunction (PSD) Reporting Group
NCT01544998 (6) [back to overview]Change in Urinary Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate (cGMP) at 60 Minutes for Preclinical Systolic Dysfunction (PSD) Reporting Group
NCT01544998 (6) [back to overview]Change in Urinary Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate (cGMP) at 60 Minutes for Preclinical Diastolic Dysfunction (PDD) Reporting Group
NCT01661595 (25) [back to overview]Exercised Induced Fatigability as Measured by Fatigue Rating Scale After 4 Weeks of Active Drug
NCT01661595 (25) [back to overview]Fat Mass as Measured by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry at Week 0.
NCT01661595 (25) [back to overview]Fat Mass as Measured by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry at Week 4.
NCT01661595 (25) [back to overview]Exercised Induced Fatigability as Measured by Fatigue Rating Scale After 4 Weeks of Placebo
NCT01661595 (25) [back to overview]Hemoglobin Level at Week 0
NCT01661595 (25) [back to overview]Hematocrit Level Was Measured at 4 Weeks
NCT01661595 (25) [back to overview]Hematocrit Level Measured at Week 0
NCT01661595 (25) [back to overview]Fat Mass as Measured by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry at Week 8.
NCT01661595 (25) [back to overview]Hematocrit Level Measured at Week 8
NCT01661595 (25) [back to overview]Walking Distance at 100% Effort as Measured by Walking Test After 4 Weeks of Placebo
NCT01661595 (25) [back to overview]Walking Distance at 100% Effort as Measured by Walking Test After 4 Weeks of Active Drug
NCT01661595 (25) [back to overview]Skeletal Muscle Fatigue as Measured by Biodex 4 Pro After 4 Weeks of Placebo
NCT01661595 (25) [back to overview]Skeletal Muscle Fatigue as Measured by Biodex 4 Pro After 4 Weeks of Active Drug
NCT01661595 (25) [back to overview]Perceptual Fatigue as Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Short Form Total Score at Week 8
NCT01661595 (25) [back to overview]Hemoglobin Level Measured at Week 4
NCT01661595 (25) [back to overview]Perceptual Fatigue as Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Short Form Total Score at Week 0
NCT01661595 (25) [back to overview]Maximum Peak Isometric Leg Strength as Measured by Biodex Pro4 After 4 Weeks of Placebo
NCT01661595 (25) [back to overview]Maximum Peak Isometric Leg Strength as Measured by Biodex Pro4 After 4 Weeks of Active Drug.
NCT01661595 (25) [back to overview]Maximum Peak Isokinetic Leg Strength as Measured by Biodex Pro4 After 4 Weeks of Placebo.
NCT01661595 (25) [back to overview]Perceptual Fatigue as Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Short Form Total Score at Week 4
NCT01661595 (25) [back to overview]Lean Body Mass as Measured by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry at Week 8.
NCT01661595 (25) [back to overview]Lean Body Mass as Measured by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry at Week 4.
NCT01661595 (25) [back to overview]Lean Body Mass as Measured by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry at Week 0.
NCT01661595 (25) [back to overview]Hemoglobin Level Measured at Week 8
NCT01661595 (25) [back to overview]Maximum Peak Isokinetic Leg Strength as Measured by Biodex Pro4 After 4 Weeks of Active Drug
NCT01824290 (7) [back to overview]Period 1: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in a 6 Minute Walk (MW) Distance in Meters
NCT01824290 (7) [back to overview]Period 1: Percentage of Participants Who Experience CW
NCT01824290 (7) [back to overview]Period 1: Time to Adjudicated Clinical Worsening (CW)
NCT01824290 (7) [back to overview]Period 2: Percentage of Participants Who Experience CW
NCT01824290 (7) [back to overview]Period 1: Pharmacokinetics (PK): Apparent Clearance (CL/F) of Tadalafil at Steady-state
NCT01824290 (7) [back to overview]Period 1: Pharmacokinetics (PK): Apparent Clearance (CL/F) of Tadalafil at Steady-state
NCT01824290 (7) [back to overview]Period 2: Time to First Occurrence of CW
NCT01862536 (7) [back to overview]Pulmonary Vascular Resistance
NCT01862536 (7) [back to overview]Change in 6 Minute Walk Test
NCT01862536 (7) [back to overview]Tricuspid Annular Plane Excursion (TAPSE)
NCT01862536 (7) [back to overview]St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, Dyspnea and Health Related Quality of Life
NCT01862536 (7) [back to overview]Maximum VO2
NCT01862536 (7) [back to overview]Mean Pulmonary Artery Pressure
NCT01862536 (7) [back to overview]N-type Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) Concentration
NCT01865084 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Six Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) in Meters
NCT01865084 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Global Score
NCT01865084 (7) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (PK): Apparent Clearance (CL/F) of Tadalafil
NCT01865084 (7) [back to overview]Time to Persistent 10% Worsening in 6MWD
NCT01865084 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) Scores
NCT01865084 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Timed Function Tests in Seconds
NCT01865084 (7) [back to overview]Time to Persistent 10% Worsening in Timed Function Tests (TFT)
NCT01937871 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 2 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Questionnaire at Week 12
NCT01937871 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in IIEF Intercourse Satisfaction at Week 12
NCT01937871 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12
NCT01937871 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 3 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8
NCT01937871 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 2 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8
NCT01937871 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in IIEF EF at Week 4 and Week 8
NCT01937871 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 3 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 12
NCT01937871 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total IPSS at Week 4 and Week 8
NCT01937871 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in IIEF Subscores at Week 12
NCT01937871 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 12
NCT01937871 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR) at Week 12
NCT01937871 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Modified International Prostate Symptom Score (mIPSS) at Week 2
NCT01937871 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in IPSS Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore at Week 12
NCT01937871 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in IPSS Storage (Irritative) Subscore at Week 12
NCT01937871 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Uroflowmetry Measures at Week 12
NCT01937871 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in IPSS Quality of Life (QoL) Index at Week 12
NCT01937871 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in IIEF Sexual Desire at Week 12
NCT01937871 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12
NCT01937871 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in IPSS at Week 12
NCT01937871 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Erectile Function (EF) Domain at Week 12
NCT01937871 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in IIEF Overall Satisfaction (OS) at Week 12
NCT01937871 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in IIEF Orgasmic Function at Week 12
NCT01970176 (3) [back to overview]Change in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)
NCT01970176 (3) [back to overview]Change in Urinary Cyclic Guanosine 3',5'-Monophosphate (cGMP) Hormone Excretion
NCT01970176 (3) [back to overview]Change in Urinary Sodium Excretion
NCT02058095 (3) [back to overview]Change in Urinary Sodium Excretion
NCT02058095 (3) [back to overview]Change in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)
NCT02058095 (3) [back to overview]Change in Urinary Cyclic Guanosine 3',5'-Monophosphate (cGMP) Hormone Excretion
NCT02194465 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 4 Weeks in 24 Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM)
NCT02194465 (5) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of LY2623091
NCT02194465 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 4 Weeks in Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
NCT02194465 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 4 Weeks in Seated Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)
NCT02194465 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 4 Weeks in Serum Potassium
NCT02224846 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing at Least One Adverse Event Leading to Discontinuation
NCT02224846 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing at Least One Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (Serious or Non-Serious)
NCT02224846 (8) [back to overview]"Percentage of Participants With Yes Responses to Global Assessment Questions (GAQ)1 and GAQ2"
NCT02224846 (8) [back to overview]"Percentage of Participants With Yes Responses to Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary"
NCT02224846 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the IIEF-EF Domain Questionnaire Score of 5 mg Tadalafil Treatments
NCT02224846 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Normal Erectile Functioning
NCT02224846 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Normal Erectile Functioning of 5 mg Tadalafil Treatments
NCT02224846 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function- Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) Domain Questionnaire Score
NCT02300259 (6) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve From Zero to Infinity (AUC[0-infinity]) of LY2623091
NCT02300259 (6) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Maximum Drug Concentration (Cmax) of LY2623091
NCT02300259 (6) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to Time T, Where T is the Last Time Point With a Measurable Concentration (AUC[0-tlast]) of Simvastatin and Simvastatin Acid
NCT02300259 (6) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve From Zero to Infinity (AUC[0-infinity]) of Simvastatin and Simvastatin Acid
NCT02300259 (6) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to Time T, Where T is the Last Time Point With a Measurable Concentration (AUC[0-tlast]) of LY2623091
NCT02300259 (6) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Maximum Drug Concentration (Cmax) of Simvastatin and Simvastatin Acid
NCT02431754 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With PGI-I (Drug Attributes Questionnaire) on 8 Symptoms for BPH-Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Improvement
NCT02431754 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline on the IPSS Quality of Life Score (IPSS QoL )
NCT02431754 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline on the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Total Score
NCT02431754 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline on the IPSS Storage (Irritative) Subscore
NCT02431754 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline on the IPSS Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore
NCT02431754 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)
NCT02431754 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Preferring Combination Therapy Over Alpha Blocker Alone on the Treatment Preference Questionnaire (TPQ)
NCT02558231 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Absence of Worsening From Baseline to Week 26 in World Health Organization (WHO) Functional Class (FC)
NCT02558231 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Disease Progression Event
NCT02558231 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in 6-minute Walk Distance (6MWD)
NCT02558231 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Cardiac Index
NCT02558231 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Mean Pulmonary Arterial Pressure (mPAP)
NCT02558231 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Mean Right Atrial Pressure (mRAP)
NCT02558231 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) Levels
NCT02558231 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR)
NCT02558231 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Total Pulmonary Resistance
NCT02558231 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Venous Oxygen Saturation (%)
NCT02595684 (17) [back to overview]Body Fat
NCT02595684 (17) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve (AUC) Glucose
NCT02595684 (17) [back to overview]Diastolic Blood Pressure
NCT02595684 (17) [back to overview]Body Mass Index
NCT02595684 (17) [back to overview]Body Weight
NCT02595684 (17) [back to overview]Fasting Glucose
NCT02595684 (17) [back to overview]First Phase of Insulin Secretion
NCT02595684 (17) [back to overview]High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-c)
NCT02595684 (17) [back to overview]Insulin Sensitivity
NCT02595684 (17) [back to overview]Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-c)
NCT02595684 (17) [back to overview]Postprandial Glucose
NCT02595684 (17) [back to overview]Systolic Blood Pressure
NCT02595684 (17) [back to overview]Total Cholesterol
NCT02595684 (17) [back to overview]Total Insulin Secretion
NCT02595684 (17) [back to overview]Triglycerides
NCT02595684 (17) [back to overview]Waist Circumference
NCT02595684 (17) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve (AUC) Insulin
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Values of PCI- Part 2
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Urinalysis Results by Dipstick Method-Part 1
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Ambrisentan and Tadalafil in FDC (Ambrisentan 10 mg + Tadalafil 40 mg) and Montherapies (Ambrisentan 10 mg & Tadalafil 40 mg) - Part 1
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Cmax of Ambrisentan and Tadalafil in FDC (Ambrisentan 10 mg + Tadalafil 40 mg) and Montherapies (Ambrisentan 10 mg & Tadalafil 40 mg) - Part 2
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Cmax for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil, Following Candidate FDC (Ambrisentan 10 mg + Tadalafil 40 mg) Relative to Reference Monotherapies Tested (Ambrisentan 10 mg & Tadalafil 40 mg), Under Fed and Fasted Conditions-Part 3A
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Vital- Temperature, Part 2
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Cmax for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil, FDCs (Ambrisentan 5 mg + Tadalafil 40 mg) Relative to Reference Monotherapies Tested (Ambrisentan 5 mg & Tadalafil 40 mg) Under Fasted Conditions-3B
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Cmax for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil, FDCs (Ambrisentan 5 mg + Tadalafil 20 mg) Relative to Reference Monotherapies Tested (Ambrisentan 5 mg & Tadalafil 20 mg) Under Fasted Conditions-3B
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Vital- Temperature, Part 3B
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Vital- Temperature, Part 3A
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Vital- Temperature, Part 1
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Vital- Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Part 1
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Vital- SBP and DBP, Part 3B
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Vital- SBP and DBP, Part 3A
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Vital Signs-Respiratory Rate, Part 3A
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Vital Signs-Respiratory Rate, Part 3-B
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Vital Signs-Respiratory Rate, Part 2
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Vital Signs-Respiratory Rate, Part 1
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Vital Signs-Heart Rate, Part 3B
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Vital Signs-Heart Rate, Part 3A
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Vital Signs-Heart Rate, Part 2
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Vital Signs-Heart Rate, Part 1
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]AUC From Time of Dose to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC [0-t]), in FDC, (Ambrisentan 10 mg + Tadalafil 40 mg) Relative to Reference Monotherapies Tested (Ambrisentan 10 mg & Tadalafil 40 mg), Under Fasting- Part 1
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]AUC (0-t) for FDC, (Ambrisentan 10 mg + Tadalafil 40 mg) Relative to Reference Monotherapies Tested (Ambrisentan 10 mg & Tadalafil 40 mg), Under Fasting- Part 2
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]AUC (0-t) for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil, Following Candidate FDC (Ambrisentan 10 mg + Tadalafil 40 mg) Relative to Reference Monotherapies Tested (Ambrisentan 10 mg & Tadalafil 40 mg), Under Fed and Fasted Conditions-Part 3A
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]AUC (0-t) for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil, FDCs (Ambrisentan 5 mg + Tadalafil 40 mg) Relative to Reference Monotherapies Tested (Ambrisentan 5 mg & Tadalafil 40 mg) Under Fasted Conditions-3B
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Vital- SBP and DBP, Part 2
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]AUC (0-inf) for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil, Following Candidate FDC (Ambrisentan 10 mg + Tadalafil 40 mg) Relative to Reference Monotherapies Tested (Ambrisentan 10 mg & Tadalafil 40 mg), Under Fed and Fasted Conditions-3A
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]AUC (0-inf) for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil, FDCs (Ambrisentan 5 mg + Tadalafil 40 mg) Relative to Reference Monotherapies Tested (Ambrisentan 5 mg & Tadalafil 40 mg) Under Fasted Conditions-3B
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]AUC (0-inf) for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil, FDCs (Ambrisentan 5 mg + Tadalafil 20 mg) Relative to Reference Monotherapies Tested (Ambrisentan 5 mg & Tadalafil 20 mg) Under Fasted Conditions-3B
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]AUC (0 - Inf) for FDC, (Ambrisentan 10 mg + Tadalafil 40 mg) Relative to Reference Monotherapies Tested (Ambrisentan 10 mg & Tadalafil 40 mg), Under Fasting- Part 2
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to Infinite (Inf) Time, AUC (0-inf) of Ambrisentan and Tadalafil in FDC (Ambrisentan 10 mg + Tadalafil 40 mg) and Montherapies (Ambrisentan 10 mg & Tadalafil 40 mg) - Part 1
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings, -Part 1
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal ECG Findings, -Part 3B
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal ECG Findings, -Part 3A
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Time Taken to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil in FDC and Reference Treatment - Part 3B
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Time Taken to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil in FDC and Reference Treatment - Part 3A
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]AUC (0-t) for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil, FDCs (Ambrisentan 5 mg + Tadalafil 20 mg) Relative to Reference Monotherapies Tested (Ambrisentan 5 mg & Tadalafil 20 mg) Under Fasted Conditions- Part 3B
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Time Taken to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil in FDC and Reference Treatment - Part 2
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Time Taken to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil in FDC and Reference Treatment - Part 1
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Plasma t1/2 for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil in FDC and Reference Treatment Under Fed and Fasted Condition- Part 3B
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Plasma t1/2 for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil in FDC and Reference Treatment Under Fed and Fasted Condition- Part 3A
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Plasma t1/2 for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil in FDC and Reference Treatment Under Fed and Fasted Condition- Part 2
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Plasma Half Life (t1/2) for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil in FDC and Reference Treatment Under Fed and Fasted Condition- Part1
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Urinalysis Results by Dipstick Analysis-Part 3B
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Urinalysis Results by Dipstick Analysis-Part 3A
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Urinalysis Results by Dipstick Analysis-Part 2
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs)-Part 1
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Number of Participants With SAEs and AEs-Part 3B
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal ECG Findings, -Part 2
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Number of Participants With SAEs and AEs-Part 3A
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Number of Participants With SAEs and AEs-Part 2
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)- Part1
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hematology Values of PCI - Part 3B
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hematology Values of PCI - Part 3A
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hematology Values of PCI - Part 2
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Values of PCI- Part1
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Values of PCI- Part 3B
NCT02688387 (59) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Values of PCI- Part 3A
NCT02819440 (8) [back to overview]Insulin Sensitivity After 12 Weeks of Drug Therapy
NCT02819440 (8) [back to overview]Sexual Function
NCT02819440 (8) [back to overview]Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) (g)
NCT02819440 (8) [back to overview]Resting Energy Expenditure After 12 Weeks of Drug Therapy (kcal/Day)
NCT02819440 (8) [back to overview]Quality of Life Using the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Score
NCT02819440 (8) [back to overview]Physical Activity-induced Energy Expenditure (kcal/Day)
NCT02819440 (8) [back to overview]Maximal Oxygen Consumption
NCT02819440 (8) [back to overview]Maximal Exercise Energy Expenditure (kcal/Day)
NCT02891850 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Satisfactory Clinical Response at Week 24
NCT02891850 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adjudicated Clinical Worsening at Week 24
NCT02891850 (5) [back to overview]Change in World Health Organization Functional Class (WHO FC) With Last Observation Carried Forward From Baseline to Week 24
NCT02891850 (5) [back to overview]Change in 6 Minute Walking Distance (6MWD) With Last Observation Carried Forward From Baseline to 24 Weeks
NCT02891850 (5) [back to overview]Change in N-terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) With Last Observation Carried Forward at Week 24
NCT03785210 (4) [back to overview]Best Overall Response (BOR)
NCT03785210 (4) [back to overview]Serious Adverse Events Possibly, Probably, and/or Definitely Related to Treatment
NCT03785210 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) of Nivolumab Combined With Oral Vancomycin and Tadalafil in Participants With Refractory Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) or Liver Dominant Metastatic Cancer From Colorectal Cancer or Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
NCT03785210 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0)
NCT03904693 (1) [back to overview]Change in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR) Expressed as the Ratio of Geometric Means of End of Double-blind Treatment (EDBT) to Baseline
NCT04984993 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Uses Per Patient That Led to an Onset of Erection Within a Certain Period of Time in Patients Randomised to MED3000.
NCT04984993 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Uses Per Patient That Led to an Onset of Action Within a Certain Period of Time in Patients Randomised to MED3000.
NCT04984993 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Erectile Function (EF) Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Questionnaire, in Patients Randomised to MED3000, at Week 24

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS): Supportive Analysis

Assesses the severity of BPH-LUTS and the response to therapy. The total score was derived by summing the scores of the responses to the 7 component questions. Scores range from 0 to 35; 0-7 Mildly symptomatic; 8-19 moderately symptomatic; 20-35 severely symptomatic. (NCT00384930)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-2.23
2.5 mg Tadalafil-3.81
5 mg Tadalafil-4.83
10 mg Tadalafil-5.13
20 mg Tadalafil-5.17

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index (BII)

Measures the impact that symptoms of BPH has on the patients well being. This questionnaire has 4 questions assessing the level of urinary discomfort and it's impact on the patients. Three questions range from 0 (no impact) to 4 (high impact); one question ranges from 0 (low impact) to 4 (high impact). The BII score ranges from 0 to 16. (NCT00384930)
Timeframe: baseline and 12 weeks

,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline
10 mg Tadalafil4.86-1.31
2.5 mg Tadalafil4.73-0.83
20 mg Tadalafil4.75-1.34
5 mg Tadalafil4.66-1.25
Placebo4.94-0.79

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) EF Domain

Measures erectile function over the past 4 weeks on Questions 1-5 and 15 (6 questions) of the International Index of Erecile Function (IIEF) questionnaire. Scores range from 0 (low/no erectile function) to 5 (high erectile function), thus the 6 questions of the IIEF-EF domain range from 0 to 30. (NCT00384930)
Timeframe: baseline and 12 weeks

,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline
10 mg Tadalafil17.226.64
2.5 mg Tadalafil17.423.97
20 mg Tadalafil16.287.44
5 mg Tadalafil15.296.56
Placebo17.260.78

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) (Irritative) Subscore

Measures irritative symptoms over the past 4 weeks of the IPSS. IPSS irritative subscore is the sum of Questions 2, 4 and 7 of the IPSS questionnaire. Scores range from 1 (few irritative symptoms) to 5 (frequent irritative symptoms), thus the 3 questions of the irritative subscore range from 0 to 15. (NCT00384930)
Timeframe: baseline and 12 weeks

,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline
10 mg Tadalafil7.88-2.04
2.5 mg Tadalafil7.78-1.62
20 mg Tadalafil7.53-2.05
5 mg Tadalafil7.65-1.91
Placebo7.58-0.99

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Quality of Life (QoL) Index

Assessment of quality of life (QOL) by urinary symptoms, with scores ranging from 0 (delighted) to 6 (terrible). (NCT00384930)
Timeframe: baseline and 12 weeks

,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline
10 mg Tadalafil3.55-0.98
2.5 mg Tadalafil3.69-0.86
20 mg Tadalafil3.59-0.97
5.0 mg Tadalafil3.54-0.92
Placebo3.57-0.56

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Question 7 (Nocturia)

Measures nocturia (the need to get up at night to urinate) over the past 4 weeks. Scores range from 1 (few episodes of nocturia) to 5 (frequent episodes of nocturia). (NCT00384930)
Timeframe: baseline and 12 weeks

,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline
10 mg Tadalafil2.36-0.43
2.5 mg Tadalafil2.37-0.43
20 mg Tadalafil2.20-0.54
5 mg Tadalafil2.36-0.49
Placebo2.36-0.36

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore

Measures obstructive symptoms over the past 4 weeks of the IPSS. IPSS obstructive subscore is the sum of Questions 1, 3, 5 and 6 of the IPSS questionnaire. Scores range from 1 (few obstructive symptoms) to 5 (frequent obstructive symptoms), thus the 4 questions of the obstructive score range from 0 to 20. (NCT00384930)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline
10 mg Tadalafil9.88-3.29
2.5 mg Tadalafil9.71-2.31
20 mg Tadalafil9.57-3.17
5 mg Tadalafil9.65-3.00
Placebo9.51-1.27

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS): Primary Analysis

Assesses the severity of BPH-LUTS and the response to therapy. The total score was derived by summing the scores of the responses to the 7 component questions. Scores range from 0 to 35; 0-7 Mildly symptomatic; 8-19 moderately symptomatic; 20-35 severely symptomatic. (NCT00384930)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline
5 mg Tadalafil17.30-4.92
Placebo17.08-2.25

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Peak Urinary Flow

Measures the maximum flow rate of urine (measured in mL/s). This is a continuous parameter with positive numeric values. (NCT00384930)
Timeframe: baseline and 12 weeks

,,,,
Interventionmilliliter per second (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline
10 mg Tadalafil9.931.69
2.5 mg Tadalafil9.971.50
20 mg Tadalafil9.822.15
5 mg Tadalafil10.371.61
Placebo10.311.23

[back to top]

"Number of Participants Who Answer Yes to the Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) Global Assessment Question (LUTS-GAQ)"

LUTS-GAQ Question asks the participant if the treatment they have been on has improved their uninary symptoms. (NCT00384930)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo109
2.5 mg Tadalafil120
5 mg Tadalafil139
10 mg Tadalafil146
20 mg Tadalafil138

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVRcath) Measured During Free-Flow Studies

PVRcath is the volume of urine remaining int he bladder after voiding, measured by catheterization. (NCT00386009)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

,
Interventionmilliliters (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint
Placebo59.62-1.85
Tadalafil48.99-9.13

[back to top]

Clinically Adverse and Statistically Significant Changes From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Laboratory Tests

Laboratory tests that were statistically significant and clinically adverse would be reported for safety. (NCT00386009)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

Interventionsignificant and clinically adverse labs (Number)
Placebo0
Tadalafil0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Bladder Contractility Index (BCI) Measured During Pressure-Flow Studies

BCI was derived from the equation PdetQmax + 5Qmax. Scores: <100 means weak, 100-150 menas normal, >150 means strong. A decrease means a decrease in contractility of the bladder. (NCT00386009)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a nomogram (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint
Placebo102.284.43
Tadalafil108.32-1.04

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Bladder Outlet Obstruction Index (BOOI) Measured During Pressure-Flow Studies

BOOI, formerly known as the Abrams-Griffith number, was derived from the equation PdetQmax - 2Qmax. Scores: <20 means unobstructed, 20-40 means equivocol, >40 means obstructed. An increase means worsening of obstruction, a decreased means lessening of obstruction (improvement). (NCT00386009)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a nomogram (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint
Placebo35.840.92
Tadalafil36.28-3.71

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Bladder Voiding Efficiency (BVE) Measured During Free-Flow Studies

Bladder voiding efficiency was defined as (Vcomp/total bladder capacity) X 100 (obtained when the bladder was full). (NCT00386009)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

,
Interventionmilliliters (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint
Placebo84.01-0.52
Tadalafil85.851.85

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Bladder Volume at First Involuntary Detrusor Contraction

Assessed in participants with involuntary detrusor contractions during the bladder filling at both baseline and endpoint. (NCT00386009)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

,
Interventionmilliliters (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint
Placebo120.5527.86
Tadalafil164.0028.56

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Detrusor Pressure at Peak Urinary Flow Rate (PdetQmax)

(NCT00386009)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

,
Interventioncentimeters of water (cm H20) (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint
Placebo54.831.92
Tadalafil56.87-2.95

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Total Score

The IPSS Total Score is obtained by combining the scores of the responses to the 7 component questions. Each question is scored from 0-5 for an IPSS range of 0-35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. (NCT00386009)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint
Placebo22.01-5.04
Tadalafil21.46-9.13

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Maximum Detrusor Pressure (Max Pdet) Measured During Pressure-Flow Studies

Max Pdet was defined as the maximum detrusor pressure observed during voiding. (NCT00386009)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

,
Interventioncentimeters of water (cm H20) (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint
Placebo67.13-0.48
Tadalafil72.20-2.11

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Mean Urinary Flow Rate (Qave) Measured During Free-Flow Studies

Qave was measured during free-flow tests using a standard calibrated flow meter. (NCT00386009)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

,
Interventionmillilters per second (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint
Placebo7.10-0.01
Tadalafil7.231.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Mean Urinary Flow Rate (Qave) Measured During Pressure-Flow Studies

Qave was measured during pressure-flow tests. (NCT00386009)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

,
Interventionmilliliters per second (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint
Placebo4.670.45
Tadalafil5.500.58

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Peak Urinary Flow Rate (Qmax) Measured During Free-Flow Studies

Qmax was measured during free-flow tests using a standard calibrated flow meter. (NCT00386009)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

,
Interventionmilliliters per second (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint
Placebo13.030.52
Tadalafil14.750.01

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Peak Urinary Flow Rate (Qmax) Measured During Pressure-Flow Studies

Qmax was measured duirng pressure-flow tests. (NCT00386009)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

,
Interventionmilliliters per second (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint
Placebo9.490.50
Tadalafil10.290.38

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Total Bladder Capacity Measured During Free-Flow Studies

Total bladder capacity was defined as Vcomp + PVRcath (obtained when the bladder was full). (NCT00386009)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

,
Interventionmilliliters (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint
Placebo327.95-17.53
Tadalafil316.79-14.88

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Volume of Voided Urine (Vcomp) Measured During Free-Flow Studies

(NCT00386009)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

,
Interventionmilliliters (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint
Placebo258.56-4.10
Tadalafil268.22-5.17

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Volume of Voided Urine (Vcomp) Measured During Pressure-Flow Studies

Vcomp was defined as the volume of voided urine measured during pressure-flow tests. (NCT00386009)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

,
Interventionmilliliters (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint
Placebo294.103.31
Tadalafil296.6413.51

[back to top]

Presence of Involuntary Detrusor Contractions During Bladder Filling

(NCT00386009)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Present at BaselineNot Present at BaselinePresent at EndpointNot Present at EndpointPresent at Both Baseline and EndpointPresent at Baseline OnlyPresent at Endpoint OnlyPresent at Neither Baseline nor Endpoint
Placebo3358365522111444
Tadalafil2856315318101343

[back to top]

Improvement in the Sexual Quality of Life in the Subject and His Study Partner as Measured by the Sexual Quality of Life (SQoL) Domain of the Sexual Life Quality Questionnaire (SLQQ)

The original item scores (-4 to 4 range) were converted to 0 to 8 scale score by adding 4 to each recorded responses. Each transformed score was multiplied by 12.5 for a total range of 0 to 100. Higher scores are indicative of a higher sexual quality of life. (NCT00422734)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
SQoL - Subject (change from baseline)SQoL-Partner (change from baseline) (n=70, n=238)
Placebo12.597.93
Tadalafil39.3732.87

[back to top]

Sexual Life Quality Questionnaire (SLQQ) Treatment Satisfaction Domain

The 6 SLQQ-treatment satisfaction questions were answered by subject and partner at Visit 4/Final Visit. Original item scores (1 to 6 range) were converted to 0 to 5 scale by subtracting 1 to each recorded responses. Each transformed score was multiplied by 20. Total range of scores: 0 (low satisfaction) to 100 (high satisfaction). (NCT00422734)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
SLQQ - Subject (n=72, n=244)SLQQ - Partner (n=70, n=238)
Placebo51.5855.25
Tadalafil75.0473.42

[back to top]

"Percent of Subjects With Yes Responses to Global Assessment Questionnaire (GAQ) - Subject Response"

"Percent of subjects with Yes responses to Question 1 (Improvement in Erections) and Question 2 (Improvement in the Ability to Engage in Sexual Activity)" (NCT00422734)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of subjects answering Yes (Number)
GAQ Question 1GAQ Question 2
Placebo2622
Tadalafil8179

[back to top]

"Percent of Partners With Yes Responses to Global Assessment Questionnaire (GAQ) - Partner Response"

"Percent of Partners with Yes responses to Question 1 (Improvement in Erections) and Question 2 (Improvement in the Ability to Engage in Sexual Activity)" (NCT00422734)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of partners answering Yes (Number)
GAQ Question 1GAQ Question 2
Placebo3024
Tadalafil7976

[back to top]

"Change From Baseline to Endpoint in the Percent of Yes Responses to Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary Questions 2 (SEP2) and 3 (SEP3)."

"The baseline and endpoint score for each SEP question 2 (Insert penis into vagina) and 3 (Successful intercourse) are the subject's percentage of yes responses to those questions during the run-in period and postbaseline period, respectively." (NCT00422734)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

,
Interventionpercent (Least Squares Mean)
"Question 2 change from baseline in percent yes""Question 3 change from baseline in percent yes"
Placebo2.1910.80
Tadalafil28.8046.46

[back to top]

"Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Percent of Yes Responses to Partner-Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Questions 1 and 2 - Partner Response"

"The baseline and endpoint score for each SEP question 1 (Achieve some erection) and 2 (Insert penis into vagina) are the partner's percentage of yes responses to those questions during the run-in period and postbaseline period, respectively." (NCT00422734)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

,
Interventionpercent (Least Squares Mean)
"Question 1 change from baseline in percent Yes""Question 2 change from baseline in percent Yes"
Placebo1.256.97
Tadalafil18.3430.69

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 Endpoint in the International Index of Erectile Function - Intercourse Satisfaction Domain - Subject Response

Self-reported intercourse satisfaction over the past 4 weeks. Scores range from 0 (low/no satisfaction to 5 (high satisfaction), thus the 3 questions of the IIEF-IS domain range from 0 to 15. (NCT00422734)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.09
Tadalafil2.74

[back to top]

"Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Percent of Yes Responses to Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Questions 4 and 5 - Subject Response"

"The baseline and endpoint score for each SEP question 4 (Satisfied with hardness) and 5 (Satisfied overall) are the subject's percentage of yes responses to those questions during the run-in period and postbaseline period, respectively." (NCT00422734)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

,
Interventionpercent (Least Squares Mean)
"Question 4 change from baseline in percent Yes""Question 5 change from baseline in percent Yes"
Placebo12.0811.47
Tadalafil50.0548.78

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)- Erectile Function Domain Score (Sum of IIEF Questions 1-5 and 15)

Measures erectile function over the past 4 weeks on Questions 1-5 and 15 (6 questions) of the International Index of Erecile Function (IIEF) questionnaire. Scores range from 0 (low/no erectile function) to 5 (high erectile function), thus the 6 questions of the IIEF-EF domain range from 0 to 30. (NCT00422734)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.49
Tadalafil8.03

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in the Satisfaction Domain of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) - Partner Response

The FSFI Satisfaction Domain (items 14-16) measures satisfaction with emotional closeness, sexual relationship, and overall sexual life. Each question is scored on a 0/1 to 5 scale and domain score is calculated by multiplying the total points by 0.4, for a total score range of 0.8 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction. (NCT00422734)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.40
Tadalafil0.32

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Overall Satisfaction Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-OS) - Subject Response

Self-reported overall satisfaction over the past 4 weeks. Scores range from 0 (low/no satisfaction to 5 (high satisfaction), thus the 2 questions of the IIEF-OS domain range from 0 to 10. (NCT00422734)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.44
Tadalafil2.57

[back to top]

"Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Percent of Yes Responses to Partner-Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 3 - Partner Response"

"The baseline and endpoint score for partner SEP question 3 (Satisfied overall) are the partner's percentage of yes responses to the question during the run-in period and postbaseline period, respectively." (NCT00422734)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

Interventionpercent (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo10.21
Tadalafil43.16

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in the Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) Questionnaire

Measures improvement in self-esteem and relationship satisfaction. Questionnaire consists of two domains, Sexual Relationship (items 1-8) and Confidence (items 9-14). Overall score is transformed onto a 0 (least favorable) to 100 (most favorable) scale. Overall score was calculated from two domains and subscales scores. (NCT00422734)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Total Score change from baselineSexual Relationship change from baselineConfidence change from baseline
Placebo3.074.610.91
Tadalafil30.4434.2825.35

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in the Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) Questionnaire - Confidence Domain Subscales

Measures improvement in confidence (items 9-14). Confidence domain consists of two subscales (Self-Esteem, items 9-12; Overall Relationship, items 13 and 14). Each domain score, subscale score, and overall score are transformed onto a 0 (least favorable) to 100 (most favorable) scale. (NCT00422734)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Self-Esteem change from baselineOverall Relationship change from baseline
Placebo3.26-4.04
Tadalafil29.5616.97

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Uroflowmetry Parameters - Peak Urine Flow Rate (Qmax) and Mean Urine Flow Rate (Qmean)

Qmax: defined as the peak urine flow rate (measured in milliliters per second [mL/second] using a standard calibrated flowmeter); and Qmean, defined as the mean urine flow rate (measured in mL/second using a standard calibrated flowmeter). (NCT00540124)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks

,,
Interventionmilliliters per second (Mean)
Baseline Qmax12 Week Change QmaxBaseline Qmean12 Week Change Qmean
Placebo10.52.85.72.0
Tadalafil11.42.46.11.5
Tamsulosin11.71.96.21.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 4, 8, and 12 Week Endpoints in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) - Nocturia Subscore

IPSS Question 7 is used to assess the frequency of nocturia. Scores range from 0 (low frequency of nocturia) to 5 (high frequency of nocturia). (NCT00540124)
Timeframe: baseline, 4, 8, and 12 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=50, n=50, n=49)4 Week Change (n=50, n=49, n=49)8 Week Change (n=47, n=50, n=48)12 Week Change (n=47, n=48, n=48)
Placebo2.0-0.3-0.4-0.5
Tadalafil1.8-0.4-0.4-0.5
Tamsulosin1.7-0.3-0.4-0.5

[back to top]

Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Combined Categories - Frequencies

"Measures clinician's perception of patient improvement of illness at the time of assessment compared with start of treatment. Scores range from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). Scores were combined to provide number of participants whose clinician indicated they were worse (scores of 5, 6, or 7), no change (score of 4), or better (scores of 1, 2, or 3)." (NCT00540124)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
WorseNo ChangeBetter
Placebo0543
Tadalafil0841
Tamsulosin4440

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 4, 8, and 12 Week Endpoints in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) - Obstructive Subscore

The IPSS voiding (obstructive) subscore is defined as sum of scores for Questions 1, 3, 5, and 6 of the IPSS. If scores for any of these questions are missing for a visit, the IPSS voiding subscore will be reported as missing for that visit. Subscore totals range from 0 to 20; higher scores are indicative of greater obstruction. (NCT00540124)
Timeframe: baseline, 4, 8, and 12 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=50, n=50, n=49)4 Week Change (n=50, n=49, n=49)8 Week Change (n=47, n=50, n=48)12 Week Change (n=47, n=48, n=48)
Placebo10.6-2.0-2.3-2.7
Tadalafil10.4-2.6-3.1-3.6
Tamsulosin11.2-2.4-3.1-3.9

[back to top]

Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Combined Categories - Frequencies

"A scale that measures the patient's perception of improvement at the time of assessment compared with the start of treatment. The score ranges from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). Scores were combined to provide number of participants who indicated they were worse (scores of 5, 6, or 7), no change (score of 4), or better (scores of 1, 2, or 3)." (NCT00540124)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
WorseNo ChangeBetter
Placebo11037
Tadalafil1543
Tamsulosin3738

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 4, 8, and 12 Week Endpoints in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) - Irritative Subscore

The IPSS storage (irritative) subscore is defined as sum of scores for Questions 2, 4, and 7 of the IPSS. If scores for any of these questions are missing for a visit, the IPSS storage subscore will be reported as missing for that visit. Subscore totals range from 0 to 15; higher scores are indicative of greater irritation. (NCT00540124)
Timeframe: baseline, 4, 8, and 12 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=50, n=50, n=49)4 Week Change (n=50, n=49, n=49)8 Week Change (n=47, n=50, n=48)12 Week Change (n=47, n=48, n=48)
Placebo6.7-0.8-0.9-1.6
Tadalafil6.7-1.4-1.6-2.2
Tamsulosin6.5-1.7-1.9-1.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 4 Week and 8 Week Endpoints in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Total Score

The IPSS Total Score is obtained by combining the scores of the responses to 1 through 7 component questions. Each question is scored from 0-5 for an IPSS range of 0-35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. (NCT00540124)
Timeframe: baseline, 4 and 8 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
4 Week Change (n=50, n=49, n=49)8 Week Change (n=47, n=50, n=48)
Placebo-2.8-3.3
Tadalafil-4.0-4.8
Tamsulosin-4.0-4.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Voids With Terminal Micturition Dribble and Post Micturition Dribble Per Week Based on Median as Reported by Patient Voiding Dribble Diary

A patient-completed diary that measures terminal dribble (dribble in the end of urination) and post-micturition dribble (dribble after urination). (NCT00540124)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks

,,
Interventionaverage number per week (Mean)
Baseline Terminal Micturation Dribble12 Week Change Terminal Micturation DribbleBaseline Post Micturation Dribble12 Week Change Post Micturation Dribble
Placebo68.7-11.714.3-0.8
Tadalafil69.81.617.8-4.8
Tamsulosin77.5-8.525.5-7.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Uroflowmetry Parameters - Voided Urine Volume (Vcomp)

Vcomp, defined as the volume of voided urine (measured in milliliters [mL]). (NCT00540124)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks

,,
Interventionmilliliters (Mean)
Baseline12 Week Change
Placebo220.021.4
Tadalafil233.219.7
Tamsulosin236.623.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Total, Waking, and Sleeping Voids (Average Number Per Week) Based on Median as Reported in Patient Voiding Dribble Diary

Patient-completed diary that measures daytime frequency (waking voids) and nocturia (sleeping voids). Average number of waking voids per week, average number of sleeping voids per week, and average number of total voids (sleeping+waking) per week are reported. (NCT00540124)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks

,,
Interventionaverage number per week (Mean)
Baseline Waking Voids12 Week Change Waking VoidsBaseline Sleeping Voids12 Week Change Sleeping VoidsBaseline Total Voids12 Week Change Total Voids
Placebo48.2-0.310.3-1.358.6-1.6
Tadalafil46.9-2.19.8-2.356.7-4.4
Tamsulosin48.4-1.37.9-1.456.3-2.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Total Urinary Incontinence Episodes Per Week Based on Median as Reported in Patient Voiding Dribble Diary

A patient-completed diary that measures urinary incontinence (UI) (leaks). Number of UI leaks per week are reported. (NCT00540124)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks

,,
Interventionaverage number per week (Mean)
Baseline12 Week Change
Placebo0.8-0.3
Tadalafil1.10.7
Tamsulosin1.6-0.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Total Score

The IPSS Total Score is obtained by combining the scores of the responses to 1 through 7 component questions. Each question is scored from 0-5 for an IPSS range of 0-35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. (NCT00540124)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline12 Week Change
Placebo17.3-4.2
Tadalafil17.1-5.8
Tamsulosin17.7-5.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index (BPH-II)

The BPH-BII is a 4-item, self-administered questionnaire evaluating impact of urinary problems on overall health and activity. Total scores range of 0 to 13; higher scores represent increased perceived impact of BPH-LUTS on overall health. If scores for any component question were missing for a visit, BPH-BII was reported as missing for that visit. (NCT00540124)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline12 Week Change
Placebo6.2-2.0
Tadalafil6.1-2.2
Tamsulosin6.2-1.7

[back to top]

Probability of No Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) Deterioration at Weeks 16, 28, 40 and up to 52

World Health Organization Functional Classification Assessment (WHO FC) is a method of classifying disease severity in PAH. The classes are: Class I: pulmonary hypertension (PH) but without resulting limitation of physical activity, Class II: PH resulting in slight limitation of physical activity, Class III: PH resulting in marked limitation of physical activity, Class IV: PH with inability to carry out any physical activity without symptoms. Deterioration of WHO FC is defined as moving to a higher WHO FC within one visit. Results are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimates (% probability) of remaining free from WHO FC deterioration after a given time. (NCT00549302)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 16, 28, 40 and 52

,
Interventionprobability (%) no PAH deterioration (Number)
Week 16 (n=57, 262)Week 28 (n=50, 238)Week 40 (n=45, 222)Week 52 (n=33,136)
Tadalafil 20 Milligrams (mg) Double-Blind95888181
Tadalafil 40 mg Double-Blind96908885

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

A summary of serious and all other non-serious AEs, which include adverse events reported for laboratory tests and vital signs, is located in the Reported Adverse Event module. (NCT00549302)
Timeframe: Baseline (Double-Blind Period) up to Week 243 (End of Open-Label Period)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Serious AEsOther Non-Serious AEs
Tadalafil 20 mg or 40 mg Double-Blind and 40 mg Open-Label184334

[back to top]

6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) at Baseline and Weeks 16, 28, 40 and 52

6MWD measured the distance a participant was able to walk unassisted in 6 minutes. (NCT00549302)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 16, 28, 40 and 52

,
Interventionmeters (m) (Mean)
Distance walked at Baseline (n=63, 287Distance walked at Week 16 (n=58, 272)Distance walked at Week 28 (n=55, 250)Distance walked at Week 40 (n=51, 241)Distance walked at Week 52 (n=51, 235)Endpoint-Week 52 or LOCF (n=60,281)
Tadalafil 20 Milligrams (mg) Double-Blind397.74396.37406.41411.81415.31401.52
Tadalafil 40 mg Double-Blind375.38381.47384.97386.57394.00379.80

[back to top]

Borg Dyspnea Assessment at Baseline and Weeks 16, 28, 40 and 52

Borg dyspnea score is a participant rated measure of their greatest degree of shortness of breath during exertion (6-minute walk test). Score ranged from 0 (nothing at all) to 10 (very, very severe [maximal]). (NCT00549302)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 16, 28, 40 and 52

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Score at Baseline (n=62, 287)Score at Week 16 (n=58, 271)Score at Week 28 (n=54,249)Score at Week 40 (n=51, 240)Score at Week 52 (n=51,235)Endpoint-Week 52 or LOCF (n=60,281)
Tadalafil 40 mg3.653.513.443.383.293.54
Tadalalfil 20 Milligrams (mg)3.413.413.463.213.683.75

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Log-transformed N-terminal Pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) Measured at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 48 (LOCF)

The primary analysis of this secondary outcome measure is mean percent change from Baseline to Week 24. The changes from Baseline to Weeks 4, 12, 36, and 48 were also evaluated. A decrease in log-transformed measurement value (pg/mL) indicates improvement for this patient population. (NCT00617305)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 48

,,,,
Interventionpg/mL (log-transformed) (Mean)
BaselineWeek 4Week 12Week 24Week 36Week 48
Ambrisentan Only6.15.75.75.75.75.6
Any Ambrisentan6.25.75.85.75.75.7
Any Placebo6.76.76.86.46.36.7
Placebo Only0.07.57.67.68.08.0
Placebo/Ambrisentan6.76.26.36.05.96.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Pulmonary Artery Pressure (mPAP) (LOCF)

This secondary hemodynamic outcome is supportive of the primary outcome. A decrease in measurement value (mmHg) indicates improvement for this patient population. (NCT00617305)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
BaselineWeek 24
Ambrisentan Only49.944.4
Any Ambrisentan50.443.8
Any Placebo52.838.8
Placebo/Ambrisentan54.538.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Right Atrial Pressure (mRAP) (LOCF)

This secondary hemodynamic outcome is supportive of the primary outcome. A decrease in measurement value (mmHg) indicates improvement for this patient population. (NCT00617305)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
BaselineWeek 24
Ambrisentan Only8.58.4
Any Ambrisentan8.78.1
Any Placebo11.16.3
Placebo/Ambrisentan10.36.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR), Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the change from baseline in PVR, and other hemodynamic parameters, following the addition of ambrisentan to background PDE-5i therapy in subjects with PAH who have demonstrated a sub-optimal response to PDE-5i monotherapy. A decrease in measurement value (dynes sec/cm^5) indicates improvement for this patient population. (NCT00617305)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

,,,
Interventiondynes sec/cm^5 (Mean)
BaselineWeek 24
Ambrisentan Only761.2518.8
Any Ambrisentan758.0509.8
Any Placebo703.6439.8
Placebo/Ambrisentan731.6439.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Six Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) Measured at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 48 (LOCF)

The primary analysis of this secondary outcome measure is mean change from Baseline to Week 24. The changes from Baseline to Weeks 4, 12, 36, and 48 were also evaluated. An increase in measurement value (meters walked) indicates improvement for this patient population. (NCT00617305)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 48

,,,,
Interventionmeters walked (Mean)
BaselineWeek 4Week 12Week 24Week 36Week 48
Ambrisentan Only361.9376.5377.9382.4366.5378.9
Any Ambrisentan369.6383.7384.3387.0370.2379.4
Any Placebo413.6441.2433.0423.4399.8387.2
Placebo Only335.0442.0422.0422.0402.0402.0
Placebo/Ambrisentan433.3441.0435.8423.8399.3383.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival, Evaluated at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and After Week 48

Overall survival was defined as the time from initiation of active treatment to death. Results are presented as the Kaplan-Meier estimate (% probability) of death after a given time. (NCT00617305)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 48+

,
InterventionProbability of death occurring (%) (Number)
At Week 4At Week 8At Week 12At Week 16At Week 20At Week 24At Week 28At Week 32At Week 36At Week 40At Week 44At Week 48After Week 48
Ambrisentan Only0000000004444
Any Ambrisentan0000000003333

[back to top]

Time to Clinical Worsening of PAH, Evaluated at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, and After Week 48

The time to clinical worsening was defined as the time from enrollment to the first occurrence of death, lung transplantation, hospitalization for PAH, atrial septostomy, or initiation of chronic parenteral prostanoid therapy. Results are presented as the Kaplan-Meier estimate (% probability) of having clinical worsening after a given time. (NCT00617305)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 48+

,
InterventionProbability of clinical worsening (%) (Number)
At Week 4At Week 8At Week 12At Week 16At Week 20At Week 24At Week 28At Week 32At Week 36At Week 40At Week 44At Week 48After Week 48
Ambrisentan Only0000336161620202020
Any Ambrisentan0000336141417171717

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cardiac Output (LOCF)

This secondary hemodynamic outcome is supportive of the primary outcome. An increase in measurement value (L/min) indicates improvement for this patient population. (NCT00617305)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

,,,
InterventionL/min (Mean)
BaselineWeek 24
Ambrisentan Only4.45.2
Any Ambrisentan4.45.2
Any Placebo4.85.2
Placebo/Ambrisentan4.85.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review (CAMPHOR) Quality of Life (QOL) Survey Overall Score Measured at Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48 (LOCF)

The primary analysis of this secondary outcome measure is mean change from Baseline to Week 24. The changes from Baseline to Weeks 12, 36, and 48 were also evaluated. Lower scores and decreases from baseline represent improved functioning and QOL. The CAMPHOR survey was not assessed at Week 4. The total CAMPHOR score scale ranges from 0 (good) to 25 (poor). A reduction in score over time represents improvement in this patient population. (NCT00617305)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 48

,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12Week 24Week 36Week48
Ambrisentan Only8.26.87.27.77.6
Any Ambrisentan7.76.76.77.27.1
Any Placebo4.24.82.83.43.6
Placebo Only4.02.02.03.03.0
Placebo/Ambrisentan4.35.53.03.53.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in World Health Organization (WHO) Functional Class (LOCF) Measured at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 48.

The primary analysis of this secondary outcome measure is change from Baseline to Week 24. The changes from Baseline to Weeks 4, 12, 36, and 48 were also evaluated. WHO categories are 1 to 4 with the worst category being 4. Improvement is represented by a change in category to a lower number (for example, change from category 3 to 2), and deterioration is represented by a change in category to a higher number (for example, change from category 2 to 4). No change is represented by no change in category (for example, category 2 which remains 2). (NCT00617305)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 48

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Week 4 - ImprovementWeek 4 - No ChangeWeek 4 - DeteriorationWeek 4 - Missing DataWeek 12 - ImprovementWeek 12 - No ChangeWeek 12 - DeteriorationWeek 12 - Missing DataWeek 24 - ImprovementWeek 24 - No ChangeWeek 24 - DeteriorationWeek 24 - Missing DataWeek 36 - ImprovementWeek 36 - No ChangeWeek 36 - DeteriorationWeek 36 - Missing DataWeek 48 - ImprovementWeek 48 - No ChangeWeek 48 - DeteriorationWeek 48 - Missing Data
Ambrisentan Only3290182401121911171411141711
Any Ambrisentan3330192701142111191611152011
Any Placebo14002300320032002300
Placebo Only10001000100010001000
Placebo/Ambrisentan04001300220022001300

[back to top]

Change in Dyspnea Index Measured at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 48 (LOCF)

The primary analysis of this secondary outcome measure is mean change from Baseline to Week 24. The changes from Baseline to Weeks 4, 12, 36, and 48 were also evaluated. The dyspnea index measures the degree of breathlessness after completion of the 6MWT using a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no breathlessness and 10 indicating maximum breathlessness. (NCT00617305)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 48

,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 4Week 12Week 24Week 36Week 48
Ambrisentan Only3.73.23.22.93.23.1
Any Ambrisentan3.63.23.32.83.23.1
Any Placebo2.63.03.82.13.43.4
Placebo Only3.02.03.03.03.03.0
Placebo/Ambrisentan2.53.34.01.93.53.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in the Intercourse Satisfaction (IS) Domain of the IIEF

Self-reported intercourse satisfaction over the past 4 weeks. Scores range from 0 (low/no satisfaction to 5 (high satisfaction), thus the 3 questions of the IIEF-IS domain range from 0 to 15. (NCT00734604)
Timeframe: baseline, 8 weeks of each treatment

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline
Sildenafil as Needed [S(PRN)]8.343.99
Tadalafil as Needed [T(PRN)]8.373.83
Tadalafil Once a Day [T(OaD)]8.353.33

[back to top]

"Question 4 I Felt Like a Whole Man Score of the Patient Perception and Feelings Questions (PPF-Q) at Endpoint"

Scores for Question 4 range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). (NCT00734604)
Timeframe: 8 weeks of each treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tadalafil Once a Day [T(OaD)]2.53
Sildenafil as Needed [S(PRN)]2.57
Tadalafil as Needed [T(PRN)]2.44

[back to top]

"Question 2 I Felt in Control of my Sex Life Score of the Patient Perception and Feelings Questions (PPF-Q) at Endpoint"

Scores for Question 2 range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). (NCT00734604)
Timeframe: 8 weeks of each treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tadalafil Once a Day [T(OaD)]2.33
Sildenafil as Needed [S(PRN)]2.14
Tadalafil as Needed [T(PRN)]2.36

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in the Overall Satisfaction (OS) Domain of the IIEF

Self-reported overall satisfaction over the past 4 weeks. Scores range from 0 (low/no satisfaction to 5 (high satisfaction), thus the 2 questions of the IIEF-OS domain range from 0 to 10. (NCT00734604)
Timeframe: baseline, 8 weeks of each treatment

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline
Sildenafil as Needed [S(PRN)]5.222.87
Tadalafil as Needed [T(PRN)]5.272.84
Tadalafil Once a Day [T(OaD)]5.262.60

[back to top]

Change From Baseline Between Tadalafil Once a Day (OaD) and Tadalafil as Needed (PRN) in Sexual Self-Confidence Domain of Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales (PAIRS)

The PAIRS is a self-administed scale that assesses the broader psychological and interpersonal outcomes associated with erectile dysfunction and its treatment. Sexual Self-Confidence score is the average of responses on 6 PAIRS item scores. Sexual Self-Confidence scores range from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). Higher scores are indicative of greater sexual self-confidence. (NCT00734604)
Timeframe: baseline, 8 weeks of each treatment

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline
Tadalafil as Needed [T(PRN)]2.240.50
Tadalafil Once a Day [T(OaD)]2.240.50

[back to top]

Change From Baseline Between Tadalafil Once a Day (OaD) and Sildenafil as Needed (PRN) in Sexual Self-Confidence Domain of Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales (PAIRS)

The PAIRS is a self-administed scale that assesses the broader psychological and interpersonal outcomes associated with erectile dysfunction and its treatment. Sexual Self-Confidence score is the average of responses on 6 PAIRS item scores. Sexual Self-Confidence scores range from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). Higher scores are indicative of greater sexual self-confidence. (NCT00734604)
Timeframe: baseline, 8 weeks of each treatment

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline
Sildenafil as Needed [S(PRN)]2.230.39
Tadalafil Once a Day [T(OaD)]2.240.50

[back to top]

Number of Participants With at Least One Serious Adverse Event

Serious adverse events are listed in the Reported Adverse Event module. (NCT00734604)
Timeframe: baseline through 26 weeks (including two washout periods of 1 week each)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tadalafil Once a Day [T(OaD)]4
Sildenafil as Needed [S(PRN)]5
Tadalafil as Needed [T(PRN)]2

[back to top]

"Question 3 I Felt the Drug Was in Control of my Erections Score of the Patient Perception and Feelings Questions (PPF-Q) at Endpoint"

Scores for Question 3 range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). (NCT00734604)
Timeframe: 8 weeks of each treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tadalafil Once a Day [T(OaD)]1.99
Sildenafil as Needed [S(PRN)]2.28
Tadalafil as Needed [T(PRN)]2.50

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in the Time Concerns Domain of PAIRS

The PAIRS is a self-administed scale that assesses the broader psychological and interpersonal outcomes associated with erectile dysfunction and its treatment. Time Concerns score is the average of responses on 8 PAIRS item scores. Time Concerns scores range from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). Higher scores are indicative of greater sexual self-confidence. (NCT00734604)
Timeframe: baseline, 8 weeks of each treatment

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline
Sildenafil as Needed [S(PRN)]2.420.00
Tadalafil as Needed [T(PRN)]2.42-0.17
Tadalafil Once a Day [T(OaD)]2.43-0.30

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in the Erectile Function Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)

Self-reported erectile function over the past 4 weeks. Scores range from 0 (low or no erectile function) to 5 (high erectile function) on 6 questions (1-5, 15 of the IIEF). Total Erectile Function Domain scores range from 0 to 30. (NCT00734604)
Timeframe: baseline, 8 weeks of each treatment

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline
Sildenafil as Needed [S(PRN)]15.409.70
Tadalafil as Needed [T(PRN)]15.559.54
Tadalafil Once a Day [T(OaD)]15.608.68

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in the Spontaneity Domain of PAIRS

The PAIRS is a self-administed scale that assesses the broader psychological and interpersonal outcomes associated with erectile dysfunction and its treatment. Spontaneity score is the average of responses on 9 PAIRS item scores. Spontaneity scores range from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). Higher scores are indicative of greater spontaneity. (NCT00734604)
Timeframe: baseline, 8 weeks of each treatment

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline
Sildenafil as Needed [S(PRN)]3.07-0.05
Tadalafil as Needed [T(PRN)]3.070.07
Tadalafil Once a Day [T(OaD)]3.060.10

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in the Self-Esteem And Relationship (SEAR) Questionnaire Transformed Total Score

Measures improvement in self-esteem and relationship satisfaction. Questionnaire consists of two domains, Sexual Relationship (items 1-8) and Confidence (items 9-14). Overall score is transformed onto a 0 (least favorable) to 100 (most favorable) scale. Overall score was calculated from two domains and subscales scores. (NCT00734604)
Timeframe: baseline, 8 weeks of each treatment

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline
Sildenafil as Needed [S(PRN)]50.5022.87
Tadalafil as Needed [T(PRN)]50.6924.13
Tadalafil Once a Day [T(OaD)]50.2822.94

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in the Proportion of Days With at Least One Morning Erection

(NCT00734604)
Timeframe: baseline, 8 weeks of each treatment

,,
Interventionproportion of days (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline
Sildenafil as Needed [S(PRN)]0.270.11
Tadalafil as Needed [T(PRN)]0.280.20
Tadalafil Once a Day [T(OaD)]0.280.26

[back to top]

Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) Score at Endpoint

EDITS is a questionnaire-based inventory capturing a participant's subjective evaluation of treatment for the participant's erection problems. All items on the 11-item Patient EDITS were scored from zero (no satisfaction or dissatisfaction) to four (high satisfaction). The EDITS Summary Score (transformed) is obtained by adding each individual score for all questions, dividing by the number of questions, and multiplying by 25, so that EDITS scores could range from a low of 0 (extremely low treatment satisfaction) to a high of 100 (extremely high treatment satisfaction). (NCT00734604)
Timeframe: 8 weeks of each treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tadalafil Once a Day [T(OaD)]75.81
Sildenafil as Needed [S(PRN)]75.68
Tadalafil as Needed [T(PRN)]79.50

[back to top]

"Question 1 I Felt as if I Did Not Have ED Score of the Patient Perception and Feelings Questions (PPF-Q) at Endpoint"

Scores for Question 1 range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). (NCT00734604)
Timeframe: 8 weeks of each treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tadalafil Once a Day [T(OaD)]1.83
Sildenafil as Needed [S(PRN)]1.78
Tadalafil as Needed [T(PRN)]1.77

[back to top]

Beta Cell Function

Beta cell function as measured during a frequently sampled IV glucose tolerance test (NCT00750308)
Timeframe: 3 hours

InterventionmicroU/mM (Mean)
Placeb Treatment241.2
Ramipril Treatment232.3
Tadalafil Treatment292.1
Combination Treatment287.6

[back to top]

Insulin Sensitivity

As assessed using IV glucose tolerance test and calculated using Min Mod units mU/mm (NCT00750308)
Timeframe: three weeks

Intervention(mU/L)-1x(min)-1xL (Mean)
Placebo Treatment2.21
Ramipril Treatment1.76
Tadalafil Treatment1.88
Combination Treatment1.76

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR) at 54-Week Endpoint

Post residual volume (PVR) is measured by ultrasound at regular intervals. (NCT00783094)
Timeframe: Baseline, 54 weeks

Interventionmilliliter (Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg-5.7
Tadalafil 5 mg-1.9
Placebo-5.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR) at 12-Week Endpoint

Postvoid residual volume (PVR) is measured by ultrasound at regular intervals. (NCT00783094)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionmilliliters (Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg-9.41
Tadalafil 5 mg-5.15
Placebo-4.72

[back to top]

Tadalafil Pharmacokinetics in Japanese Men: Plasma Concentration Measurement

Plasma from participants in the tadalafil treatment groups were assayed using a validated liquid chromatographic/mass spectrometric (LC/MS) method. (NCT00783094)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

,
Interventionnanogram/milliliter (Geometric Mean)
0-6 hours (n=225, 200)6-12 hours (n=72, 72)12-24 hours (n=102, 106)24-48 hours (n=11, 8)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg86.068.757.543.5
Tadalafil 5 mg16914093.675.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events During 42 Weeks of Open-Label Treatment

A listing of Adverse Events are reported in the Reported Adverse Event Section. (NCT00783094)
Timeframe: End of 12 weeks of double-blind through 54 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Serious Adverse EventsNon-Serious Adverse Events
Placebo494
Tadalafil 2.5 mg381
Tadalafil 5 mg481

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events During 12 Weeks of the Study

A listing of Adverse Events are reported in the Reported Adverse Event Section. (NCT00783094)
Timeframe: Baseline through 12 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Serious Adverse EventsNon-Serious Adverse Events
Placebo153
Tadalafil 2.5 mg252
Tadalafil 5 mg254

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure During at 54-Week Endpoint

(NCT00783094)
Timeframe: Baseline, 54 weeks

,,
Interventionmillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Systolic blood pressureDiastolic blood pressure
Placebo-0.5-1.3
Tadalafil 2.5 mg-2.1-1.6
Tadalafil 5 mg-1.2-2.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure at 12-Week Endpoint

(NCT00783094)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Systolic Blood PressureDiastolic Blood Pressure
Placebo-0.5-0.9
Tadalafil 2.5 mg-2.0-0.7
Tadalafil 5 mg-3.4-2.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Uroflowmetry Parameter: Peak Flow Rate (Qmax) at 12-Week Endpoint

Uroflowmetry was assessed by Qmax, defined as the peak urine flow rate (measured in mL/second using a standard calibrated flowmeter). (NCT00783094)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionmilliliters per second (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg0.7
Tadalafil 5 mg0.6
Placebo1.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Total Score at 54-Week Endpoint

The IPSS Total Score is obtained by combining the scores of the responses to 1 through 7 component questions. Each question is scored from 0-5 for an IPSS range of 0-35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. (NCT00783094)
Timeframe: Baseline, 54 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg-5.2
Tadalafil 5 mg-5.4
Placebo-6.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Sitting Heart Rate at 54-Week Endpoint

(NCT00783094)
Timeframe: Baseline, 54-weeks

Interventionbeats per minute (bpm) (Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg1.4
Tadalafil 5 mg0.4
Placebo2.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) at 12-Week Endpoint

The OABSS is a four-symptom questionnaire to assess overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms: daytime frequency, nighttime frequency, urgency, and urgency incontinence. Scores range from 0 - 15, with higher scores indicating more severe OAB symptoms. (NCT00783094)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg-0.7
Tadalafil 5 mg-0.8
Placebo-0.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in IPSS Quality of Life (QoL) Index at 54-Week Endpoint

Assessment of quality of life (QOL) by urinary symptoms, with scores ranging from 0 (delighted) to 6 (terrible). (NCT00783094)
Timeframe: Baseline, 54 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg-0.8
Tadalafil 5 mg-1.0
Placebo-0.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in IPSS Quality of Life (QoL) Index at 12-Week Endpoint

Assessment of quality of life (QOL) by urinary symptoms, with scores ranging from 0 (delighted) to 6 (terrible). (NCT00783094)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg-0.5
Tadalafil 5 mg-0.7
Placebo-0.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore at 54-Week Endpoint

IPSS obstructive subscore is the sum of Questions 1, 3, 5 and 6 of the IPSS questionnaire. Scores range from 0 (not at all) to 5 (frequent obstructive symptoms), thus the 4 questions of the obstructive score range from 0 to 20. (NCT00783094)
Timeframe: Baseline, 54 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg-3.4
Tadalafil 5 mg-3.7
Placebo-4.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore at 12-Week Endpoint

IPSS obstructive subscore is the sum of Questions 1, 3, 5 and 6 of the IPSS questionnaire. Scores range from 0 (not at all) to 5 (frequent obstructive symptoms), thus the 4 questions of the obstructive score range from 0 to 20. (NCT00783094)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg-2.9
Tadalafil 5 mg-3.3
Placebo-2.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Total Score at 12-Week Endpoint

The IPSS Total Score is obtained by combining the scores of the responses to 1 through 7 component questions. Each question is scored from 0-5 for an IPSS range of 0-35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. (NCT00783094)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg-4.5
Tadalafil 5 mg-4.9
Placebo-3.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Storage (Irritative) Subscore at 54-Week Endpoint

IPSS storage (irritative) subscore is the sum of Questions 2, 4 and 7 of the IPSS questionnaire. Scores range from 0 (not at all) to 5 (frequent irritative symptoms), thus the 3 questions of the irritative subscore range from 0 to 15. (NCT00783094)
Timeframe: Baseline, 54 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg-1.9
Tadalafil 5 mg-1.6
Placebo-1.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Storage (Irritative) Subscore at 12-Week Endpoint

IPSS storage (irritative) subscore is the sum of Questions 2, 4 and 7 of the IPSS questionnaire. Scores range from 0 (not at all) to 5 (frequent irritative symptoms), thus the 3 questions of the irritative subscore range from 0 to 15. (NCT00783094)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg-1.6
Tadalafil 5 mg-1.6
Placebo-1.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) at 54-Week Endpoint

The OABSS is a four-symptom questionnaire to assess overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms: daytime frequency, nighttime frequency, urgency, and urgency incontinence. Scores range from 0 - 15, with higher scores indicating more severe OAB symptoms. (NCT00783094)
Timeframe: Baseline, 54 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg-0.9
Tadalafil 5 mg-1.0
Placebo-0.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Sitting Heart Rate at 12-Week Endpoint

(NCT00783094)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg-0.7
Tadalafil 5 mg-1.2
Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Uroflowmetry Parameter: Peak Flow Rate (Qmax) at 54-Week Endpoint

Uroflowmetry was assessed by Qmax, defined as the peak urine flow rate (measured in mL/second using a standard calibrated flowmeter). (NCT00783094)
Timeframe: Baseline, 54 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg2.29
Tadalafil 5 mg1.51
Placebo2.01

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) at 54-Week Endpoint

Measurement of nanograms of PSA per milliliter (ng/mL) of blood. (NCT00783094)
Timeframe: Baseline, 54 weeks

Interventionmicrogram/liter (Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg0.4
Tadalafil 5 mg0.3
Placebo0.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) at 12-Week Endpoint

Measurement of nanograms of PSA per milliliter (ng/mL) of blood. (NCT00783094)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

InterventionMicrograms per liter (Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg0.26
Tadalafil 5 mg0.09
Placebo0.14

[back to top]

Raynaud's Condition Score (RCS) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

The VAS is a 100 millimeter (mm) line where 0 mm (left boundary) represents no difficulty with Raynaud's disease, and 100 mm (right boundary) represents extreme difficulty with Raynaud's disease. The subject makes a vertical mark on the VAS to indicate difficulty experienced that day with Raynaud's disease. The RCS is the distance from the left boundary to the vertical mark in mm. Results are reported from data collected at Baseline/Week 0, Week 4, Week 5, and Week 9 visits. In subjects receiving tadalafil followed by placebo: Baseline/Week 0 data is Pre-treatment, Week 4 data corresponds to Week 4 of treatment, Week 5 data is Pre-placebo, and Week 9 data corresponds to Week 4 of placebo. In subjects receiving placebo followed by tadalafil: Baseline/Week 0 data is Pre-placebo, Week 4 data corresponds to Week 4 of placebo, Week 5 data is Pre-treatment, and Week 9 data corresponds to Week 4 of treatment. (NCT00822354)
Timeframe: 9 weeks

Interventionmillimeters (Median)
Pre-treatment38.5
Week 4 of Treatment9
Pre-placebo35
Week 4 of Placebo26

[back to top]

Raynaud Severity Visual Analog Score (VAS)

The VAS is a 100 millimeter (mm) line where 0 mm (left boundary) represents Raynaud's disease of low severity, and 100 mm (right boundary) represents extremely severe Raynaud's disease. The subject makes a vertical mark on the VAS to indicate the severity of Raynaud's disease over the past two weeks. The Raynaud's severity score is the distance from the left boundary to the vertical mark in mm. Results are reported from data collected at Baseline/Week 0, Week 4, Week 5, and Week 9 visits. In subjects receiving tadalafil followed by placebo: Baseline/Week 0 data is Pre-treatment, Week 4 data corresponds to Week 4 of treatment, Week 5 data is Pre-placebo, and Week 9 data corresponds to Week 4 of placebo. In subjects receiving placebo followed by tadalafil: Baseline/Week 0 data is Pre-placebo, Week 4 data corresponds to Week 4 of placebo, Week 5 data is Pre-treatment, and Week 9 data corresponds to Week 4 of treatment. (NCT00822354)
Timeframe: 9 weeks

Interventionmillimeters (Median)
Pre-treatment39
Week 4 of Treatment16.5
Pre-placebo51.5
Week 4 of Placebo37

[back to top]

Number of Raynaud's Phenomenon Attacks Per Day

Subjects kept a daily record of the number of Raynaud's phenomenon attacks they experienced per day. Results are reported from data collected at Baseline/Week 0, Week 4, Week 5, and Week 9 visits. In subjects receiving tadalafil followed by placebo: Baseline/Week 0 data is Pre-treatment, Week 4 data corresponds to Week 4 of treatment, Week 5 data is Pre-placebo, and Week 9 data corresponds to Week 4 of placebo. In subjects receiving placebo followed by tadalafil: Baseline/Week 0 data is Pre-placebo, Week 4 data corresponds to Week 4 of placebo, Week 5 data is Pre-treatment, and Week 9 data corresponds to Week 4 of treatment. (NCT00822354)
Timeframe: 9 weeks

InterventionRaynaud's attacks per day (Median)
Pre-treatment2.4
Week 4 of Treatment1.1
Pre-placebo2.0
Week 4 of Placebo2.3

[back to top]

Duration of Raynaud's Phenomenon Attacks

Subjects kept a daily record of the number of Raynaud's phenomenon attacks they experienced per day and the duration of each attack. Results are reported from data collected at Baseline/Week 0, Week 4, Week 5, and Week 9 visits. In subjects receiving tadalafil followed by placebo: Baseline/Week 0 data is Pre-treatment, Week 4 data corresponds to Week 4 of treatment, Week 5 data is Pre-placebo, and Week 9 data corresponds to Week 4 of placebo. In subjects receiving placebo followed by tadalafil: Baseline/Week 0 data is Pre-placebo, Week 4 data corresponds to Week 4 of placebo, Week 5 data is Pre-treatment, and Week 9 data corresponds to Week 4 of treatment. (NCT00822354)
Timeframe: 9 weeks

Interventionminutes (Median)
Pre-treatment5.7
Week 4 of Treatment11.4
Pre-placebo1.2
Week 4 of Placebo14.2

[back to top]

Digital Blood Pressure

Results are reported from data collected at Baseline/Week 0, Week 4, Week 5, and Week 9 visits. In subjects receiving tadalafil followed by placebo: Baseline/Week 0 data is Pre-treatment, Week 4 data corresponds to Week 4 of treatment, Week 5 data is Pre-placebo, and Week 9 data corresponds to Week 4 of placebo. In subjects receiving placebo followed by tadalafil: Baseline/Week 0 data is Pre-placebo, Week 4 data corresponds to Week 4 of placebo, Week 5 data is Pre-treatment, and Week 9 data corresponds to Week 4 of treatment. (NCT00822354)
Timeframe: 9 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Median)
Pre-treatment97
Week 4 of Treatment80
Pre-placebo84
Week 4 of Placebo80

[back to top]

Capillary Diameter

Results are reported from data collected at Baseline/Week 0, Week 4, Week 5, and Week 9 visits. In subjects receiving tadalafil followed by placebo: Baseline/Week 0 data is Pre-treatment, Week 4 data corresponds to Week 4 of treatment, Week 5 data is Pre-placebo, and Week 9 data corresponds to Week 4 of placebo. In subjects receiving placebo followed by tadalafil: Baseline/Week 0 data is Pre-placebo, Week 4 data corresponds to Week 4 of placebo, Week 5 data is Pre-treatment, and Week 9 data corresponds to Week 4 of treatment. (NCT00822354)
Timeframe: 9 weeks

Interventionmicrometers (Median)
Pre-treatment9.3
Week 4 of Treatment10
Pre-placebo10.7
Week 4 of Placebo10

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks, International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)- Erectile Function (EF) Domain Scores

Self-reported EF. Scores range from 0 (low or no EF) to 5 (high EF) on 6 questions (1-5, 15 of the IIEF). EF Domain scores range from 0 to 30. LS mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an ANCOVA. The model includes terms for treatment group, region, centered-baseline covariate, centered-baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00827242)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil6.7
Placebo2.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks, Postvoid Residual (PVR) Volume

The amount of urine remaining in the bladder after void completion. (NCT00827242)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

InterventionmL (Mean)
Tadalafil8.8
Placebo4.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks, Peak Flow Rate (Qmax) by Uroflowmetry

Qmax was defined as the peak urine flow rate (measured in milliliters per second [mL/sec] using standard calibrated flowmeter). At each visit, a uroflowmetry assessment was considered valid and the data were included in the statistical analyses only if the prevoid total bladder volume (assessed by ultrasound) was >=150 to <=550 milliliters (mL) and the voided volume (Vcomp) was >=125 mL. (NCT00827242)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

InterventionmL/sec (Mean)
Tadalafil1.6
Placebo1.1

[back to top]

Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I), Number of Participants in 7 Response Categories

Measures clinician's perception of patient improvement at the time of assessment compared with the start of treatment. Scores range from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). (NCT00827242)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
7-Very Much Worse6-Much Worse5-A Little Worse4-No Change3-A Little Better2-Much Better1-Very Much Better
Placebo02105955257
Tadalafil05436583913

[back to top]

Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I), Number of Participants in 7 Response Categories

A scale that measures the patient's perception of improvement at the time of assessment compared with the start of treatment. The score ranges from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). (NCT00827242)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
7-Very Much Worse6-Much Worse5-A Little Worse4-No Change3-A Little Better2-Much Better1-Very Much Better
Placebo0645753326
Tadalafil15430574612

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)

The IPSS Total Score is obtained by combining the scores of the responses to Question 1 through Question 7. Each question is scored from 0-5 for a total IPSS range of 0-35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment group, region, centered-baseline covariate, centered-baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00827242)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil-5.6
Placebo-3.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Nocturia Question

Measures nocturia (the need to get up at night to urinate). Scores range from 0 (few episodes of nocturia) to 5 (frequent episodes of nocturia). LS mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an ANCOVA. The model includes terms for treatment group, region, centered-baseline covariate, centered-baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00827242)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil-0.5
Placebo-0.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Storage (Irritative) Subscore

IPSS irritative subscore is the sum of Questions 2, 4 and 7 of the IPSS questionnaire. Scores range from 0 (few irritative symptoms) to 5 (frequent irritative symptoms), thus the 3 questions of the irritative subscore range from 0 to 15. LS mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an ANCOVA. The model includes terms for treatment group, region, centered-baseline covariate, centered-baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00827242)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil-2.3
Placebo-1.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks, Mean Flow Rate (Qmean) by Uroflowmetry

Qmean was defined as the mean urine flow rate (measured in mL/sec using standard calibrated flowmeter). At each visit, a uroflowmetry assessment was considered valid and the data were included in the statistical analyses only if the prevoid total bladder volume (assessed by ultrasound) was >=150 to <=550 mL and the Vcomp was >=125 mL. (NCT00827242)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

InterventionmL/sec (Mean)
Tadalafil0.6
Placebo0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore

IPSS obstructive subscore is the sum of Questions 1, 3, 5 and 6 of the IPSS questionnaire. Scores range from 0 (few obstructive symptoms) to 5 (frequent obstructive symptoms), thus the 4 questions of the obstructive score range from 0 to 20. LS mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an ANCOVA. The model includes terms for treatment group, region, centered-baseline covariate, centered-baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00827242)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil-3.3
Placebo-2.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Quality of Life (QoL) Index

Assessment of QoL by urinary symptoms, with scores ranging from 0 (delighted) to 6 (terrible). LS mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an ANCOVA. The model includes terms for treatment group, region, centered-baseline covariate, centered-baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00827242)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil-1.0
Placebo-0.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Impact Index

The BII is a 4-item, self-administered questionnaire evaluating impact of urinary problems on overall health and activity. Total scores range from 0 to 13; higher scores represent increased perceived impact of benign prostatic hyperplasia-lower urinary tract symptoms on overall health. LS mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an ANCOVA. The model includes terms for treatment group, region, centered-baseline covariate, centered-baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00827242)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil-1.8
Placebo-1.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks, Voided Volume (Vcomp) by Uroflowmetry

Vcomp was defined as the volume of urine voided (measured in mL using standard calibrated flowmeter). At each visit, a uroflowmetry assessment was considered valid and the data were included in the statistical analyses only if the prevoid total bladder volume (assessed by ultrasound) was >=150 to <=550 mL and the Vcomp was >=125 mL. (NCT00827242)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

InterventionmL (Mean)
Tadalafil16.9
Placebo3.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 4 Weeks, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Impact Index

The BPH Impact Index (BII) is a 4-item, self-administered questionnaire evaluating impact of urinary problems on overall health and activity. Total scores range from 0 to 13; higher scores represent increased perceived impact of benign prostatic hyperplasia-lower urinary tract symptoms on overall health. LS mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an ANCOVA. The model includes terms for treatment group, region, centered-baseline covariate, centered-baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00827242)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil-1.8
Placebo-1.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 4 Weeks, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)

The IPSS Total Score is obtained by combining the scores of the responses to Question 1 through Question 7. Each question is scored from 0-5 for a total IPSS range of 0-35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. LS mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an ANCOVA. The model includes terms for treatment group, region, centered-baseline covariate, centered-baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00827242)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 Weeks

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil-5.3
Placebo-3.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 1 Week, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)

The IPSS Total Score is obtained by combining the scores of the responses to Question 1 through Question 7. Each question is scored from 0-5 for a total IPSS range of 0-35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. LS mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an ANCOVA. The model includes terms for treatment group, region, centered-baseline covariate, centered-baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00827242)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 week

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil-3.4
Placebo-2.7

[back to top]

Sexual Encounter Profile Diary Question Number 1, Change From Baseline to Post Baseline During the Double-blind Period in Percentage of Yes Responses

"Assessed was the mean change from baseline in the percentage of yes responses to the Sexual Encounter Profile Diary question number 1: Were you able to achieve at least some erection (some enlargement of the penis)? Data are presented as the mean percentage of participants who answered yes." (NCT00833638)
Timeframe: Baseline and 14 days double-blind period

Interventionpercentage of participants (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg1.97
Tadalafil 5 mg2.74
Placebo-10.06

[back to top]

Sexual Encounter Profile Diary Question Number 2, Change From Baseline to Post Baseline During the Double-blind Period in Percentage of Yes Responses

"Assessed was the mean change from baseline in the percentage of yes responses to the Sexual Encounter Profile Diary question number 2: Were you able insert your penis into your partner's vagina? Data are presented as the mean percentage of participants who answered yes." (NCT00833638)
Timeframe: Baseline and 14 days double-blind period

Interventionpercentage of participants (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg8.11
Tadalafil 5 mg13.12
Placebo-7.29

[back to top]

Sexual Encounter Profile Diary Question Number 3, Change From Baseline to Post Baseline During the Double-blind Period in Percentage of Yes Responses

"Assessed was the mean change from baseline in the percentage of yes responses to the Sexual Encounter Profile Diary question number 3: Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse? Data are presented as the mean percentage of participants who answered yes." (NCT00833638)
Timeframe: Baseline and 14 days double-blind period

Interventionpercentage of participants (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg15.67
Tadalafil 5 mg21.94
Placebo1.40

[back to top]

Sexual Encounter Profile Diary Question Number 4, Change From Baseline to Post Baseline During the Double-blind Period in Percentage of Yes Responses

"Assessed was the mean change from baseline in the percentage of yes responses to the Sexual Encounter Profile Diary question number 4: Were you satisfied with the hardness of your erection? Data are presented as the mean percentage of participants who answered yes." (NCT00833638)
Timeframe: Baseline and 14 days double-blind period

Interventionpercentage of participants (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg20.94
Tadalafil 5 mg28.50
Placebo6.70

[back to top]

Earliest Onset Day Measured by Cumulative Percentage of Participants With Yes Response to Sexual Encounter Profile Diary Question 3

"Cumulative percentage of participants achieving successful intercourse, as measured by yes responses to Sexual Encounter Profile diary question 3 (SEP3). SEP3 asks if the participant's erection lasted long enough to have successful intercourse." (NCT00833638)
Timeframe: 4 days during double-blind period

,,
Interventioncumulative percentage of participants (Number)
<= day 4<= day 3<= day 2<= day 1
Placebo47.242.336.628.5
Tadalafil 2.5 mg54.549.142.028.6
Tadalafil 5 mg62.255.048.625.2

[back to top]

Sexual Encounter Profile Diary Question 3, Daily Cumulative Percentage of Successful Intercourse Attempts

"Assessed was the cumulative precentage of successful intercourse attempts (successful attempts relative to the total number of intercourse attempts) over the 14-day double-blind treatment period. A successful attempt was defined by a yes response to the sexual encounter profile diary question #3: Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse? Data are presented as the proportion of intercourse attempts for which participants answered yes relative to the total number of intercourse attempts. Total number of attempts = TNA." (NCT00833638)
Timeframe: 14 days during double-blind period

,,
Interventionpercentage of total number of attempts (Number)
<=day14 (TNA: n=905; n=813; n=781)<=day13 (TNA: n=877; n=777; n=755)<=day12 (TNA: n=827; n=730; n=711)<=day11 (TNA: n=774; n=678; n=668)<=day10 (TNA: n=726; n=626; n=625)<=day9 (TNA: n=668; n=574; n=572)<=day8 (TNA: n=608; n=534; n=523)<=day7 (TNA: n=563; n=483; n=481)<=day6 (TNA: n=505; n=439; n=435)<=day5 (TNA: n=464; n=402; n=396)<=day4 (TNA: n=412; n=350; n=352)<=day3 (TNA: n=324; n=265; n=262)<=day2 (TNA: n=214; n=179; n=175)<=day1 (TNA: n=109; n=83; n=83)
Placebo30.931.230.830.730.629.829.628.827.927.426.227.228.032.1
Tadalafil 2.5 mg45.144.544.043.241.940.239.538.737.436.637.135.535.838.6
Tadalafil 5 mg46.646.245.944.944.243.742.842.441.641.440.938.538.933.7

[back to top]

Sexual Encounter Profile Diary Question Number 5, Change From Baseline to Post Baseline During the Double-blind Period in Percentage of Yes Responses

"Assessed was the mean change from baseline in the percentage of yes responses to the Sexual Encounter Profile Diary question number 5: Were you satisfied overall with this sexual experience? Data are presented as the mean percentage of participants who answered yes." (NCT00833638)
Timeframe: Baseline and 14 days double-blind period

Interventionpercentage of participants (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg20.45
Tadalafil 5 mg25.60
Placebo6.52

[back to top]

Sexual Encounter Profile Diary Question 3, Percentages of Yes Responses in the Double-blind Period and the Open-label Period for Participants Who Were Assigned to Tadalafil 5 mg in the Double-blind Treatment Period

"Assessed were percentages of successful intercourse attempts relative to the total number of intercourse attempts over the 14-day open-label treatment period compared with the 14-day double-blind treatment period by dose group during the double-blind treatment period. A successful attempt was defined by a yes response to the sexual encounter profile diary question #3: Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?" (NCT00833638)
Timeframe: 14-day double-blind and 14-day open-label

Interventionpercentage successful attempts (Mean)
Tadalafil 5 mg Double-blind49.54
Tadalafil 5 mg Open-label67.70

[back to top]

Sexual Encounter Profile Diary Question 3, Percentages of Yes Responses in the Double-blind Period and the Open-label Period for Participants Who Were Assigned to Tadalafil 2.5 mg in the Double-blind Treatment Period

"Assessed were percentages of successful intercourse attempts relative to the total number of intercourse attempts over the 14-day open-label treatment period compared with the 14-day double-blind treatment period by dose group during the double-blind treatment period. A successful attempt was defined by a yes response to the sexual encounter profile diary question #3: Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?" (NCT00833638)
Timeframe: 14-day double-blind and 14-day open-label

Interventionpercentage successful attempts (Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg Double-blind46.11
Tadalafil 5 mg Open-label68.33

[back to top]

Sexual Encounter Profile Diary Question 3, Percentages of Yes Responses During the Double-blind and Open-label Periods for Participants Who Were Assigned to Placebo in the Double-blind Treatment Period

"Assessed were percentages of successful intercourse attempts relative to the total number of intercourse attempts over the 14-day open-label treatment period compared with the 14-day double-blind treatment period by dose group during the double-blind treatment period. A successful attempt was defined by a yes response to the sexual encounter profile diary question #3: Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?" (NCT00833638)
Timeframe: 14 days double-blind and 14 days open-label

Interventionpercentage successful attempts (Mean)
Placebo Double-blind32.21
Tadalafil 5 mg Open-label68.27

[back to top]

Sexual Encounter Profile Diary Question 3, Percentages of Yes Responses During the Double-blind Period and the Open-label Period for Participants Who Didn't Respond to Tadalafil 2.5 mg During Double-blind Period

"Assessed were percentages of successful intercourse attempts relative to the total number of intercourse attempts in both treatment periods. A successful attempt was defined by a yes response to the sexual encounter profile diary question #3: Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?" (NCT00833638)
Timeframe: 14 days double-blind and 14 days open-label

Interventionpercentage successful attempts (Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg Double-blind32.51
Tadalafil 5 mg Open-label57.62

[back to top]

Sexual Encounter Profile Diary Question 3, the Overall Distribution of Time to Onset by Yes Responses

"Assessed was the median time to onset of efficacy (day when 50% of participants have had at least 1 successful intercourse attempt) within the first 4 days of therapy based on a yes response to the sexual encounter profile diary question 3: Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse? Data are based on participants who responded yes. For the placebo group, onset of efficacy was not reached within the first 4 days of therapy, therefore, the analysis timeframe was expanded for this group to determine the median time to onset of efficacy." (NCT00833638)
Timeframe: 4 days double-blind period

Interventiondays (Median)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg4.0
Tadalafil 5 mg3.0
Placebo6.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Total and Subdomain Scores of the Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) Questionnaire

SEAR measures improvement in self-esteem and relationship satisfaction. Questionnaire consists of two domains, Sexual Relationship (items 1-8) and Confidence (items 9-14). All questions except negatively worded questions 8 and 11 are scored from 1=almost never/never to 5=almost always/always. Questions 8 and 11 were reverse scored, thus a higher score signifies a more favorable response for all 14 items. Overall score is transformed into a 0 (least favorable) to 100 (most favorable) scale. (NCT00836693)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Total (Baseline)Total (Change)Sexual Relationship Domain (Baseline)Sexual Relationship Domain (Change)Confidence Domain (Baseline)Confidence Domain (Change)Self-Esteem Domain (Baseline)Self-Esteem Domain (Change)Overall Relationship Domain (Baseline)Overall Relationship Domain (Change)
Placebo47.98.343.99.753.16.548.59.362.30.9
Tadalafil47.320.443.023.453.116.550.519.258.211.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Nocturnal Penile Tumescence (NPT) Pattern: Percentage Volumetric Change

NPT was measured using electrobioimpedance volumetric assessment (NEVA). The NEVA device measures a man's erections during the night. The percent of volume change of the penis during erections is measured and recorded for each erection. Data presented are mean percentage of volumetric change from baseline to Week 12. (NCT00836693)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercent of volumetric change (Mean)
Tadalafil-5.96
Placebo-50.30

[back to top]

The Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) Questionnaire at 12 Week Endpoint

The subject questionnaire consists of 11 questions. Each question is rated on a scale of 0 (extremely low treatment satisfaction) to 4 (extremely high treatment satisfaction). The EDITS summary score will be obtained by adding each individual result for all questions, dividing by the number of questions answered (mean satisfaction score), and multiplying by 25, thus obtaining a score that ranges from 0 (extremely low treatment satisfaction) to 100 (extremely high satisfaction). (NCT00836693)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tadalafil72.8
Placebo52.7

[back to top]

"Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 1 Percentage of Yes Responses"

"Assessed was the mean change from baseline in the percentage of Yes responses to the SEP diary Question 1. Were you able to achieve at least some erection (some enlargement of the penis)? Data are presented as the mean percentage of yes responses per participant." (NCT00836693)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of yes responses (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12 Change
Placebo74.29.5
Tadalafil80.812.5

[back to top]

"Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 4 Percentage of Yes Responses"

"Assessed was the mean change from baseline in the percentage of Yes responses to the SEP diary Question 4. Were you satisfied with the hardness of your erection? Data are presented as the mean percentage of yes responses per participant." (NCT00836693)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of yes responses (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12 Change
Placebo14.618.3
Tadalafil11.744.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in the Frequency of Spontaneous Morning Erections Captured by Patient Diary

The morning erection diary allows the participant to record whether he experienced an erection on waking. The participant is to complete the morning erection diary every morning during the run-in, treatment and follow-up periods. The percentage of mornings the participant reported an erection is analysed. (NCT00836693)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

,
Interventionpercent (Mean)
Baseline (n=145, n=67)Week 12 Change (n=145, n=66)
Placebo28.911.9
Tadalafil31.027.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Nocturnal Penile Tumescence (NPT) Pattern: Number of Erectile Events Per Night

NPT was measured using electrobioimpedance volumetric assessment (NEVA). The NEVA device measures a man's erections during the night. The man wears the device for three nights prior to visit 2 (baseline), visit 5 (end of randomised treatment) and visit 6 (end of follow-up). Data are entered for the 2 nights prior to the visit. During the night the man may have multiple erections. The number of erections is recorded. (NCT00836693)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
InterventionNumber of events per night (Mean)
Baseline (n=122, n=63)Week 12 Change (n=96, n=49)
Placebo2.44-0.09
Tadalafil2.75-0.11

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Nocturnal Penile Tumescence (NPT) Pattern: Duration of Erectile Events Per Night

NPT was measured using electrobioimpedance volumetric assessment (NEVA). The NEVA device measures a man's erections during the night. The duration of erections are measured and recorded. Data presented are the duration of erectile events at baseline and the change from baseline to Week 12. (NCT00836693)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
Baseline (n=104, n=56)Week 12 Change (n=65, n=33)
Placebo26.372-0.398
Tadalafil28.487-1.553

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Sexual Desire (SD)

Self-reported overall satisfaction over the past 4 weeks. Scores range from 0 (low/no satisfaction to 5 (high satisfaction), thus the 2 questions of the IIEF-SD domain range from 0 to 10. (NCT00836693)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12 Change
Placebo6.6-0.1
Tadalafil6.70.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Overall Satisfaction (OS)

Self-reported overall satisfaction over the past 4 weeks. Scores range from 0 (low/no satisfaction to 5 (high satisfaction), thus the 2 questions of the IIEF-OS domain range from 0 to 10. (NCT00836693)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12 Change
Placebo5.10.8
Tadalafil5.22.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Orgasmic Functions (OF)

Self-reported overall satisfaction over the past 4 weeks. Scores range from 0 (low/no satisfaction) to 5 (high satisfaction), thus the 2 questions of the IIEF-OF domain range from 0 to 10. (NCT00836693)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12 Change
Placebo7.20.5
Tadalafil6.52.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Intercourse Satisfaction (IS)

Self-reported intercourse satisfaction over the past 4 weeks. Scores range from 0 (low/no satisfaction) to 5 (high satisfaction), thus the 3 questions of the IIEF-IS domain range from 0 to 15. (NCT00836693)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12 Change
Placebo7.61.5
Tadalafil8.22.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) at Week 12

Self-reported erectile function over the past 4 weeks. Scores range from 0 (low or no erectile function) to 5 (high erectile function) on 6 questions (1-5, 15 of the IIEF). Total Erectile Function Domain scores range from 0 to 30. (NCT00836693)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12 Change
Placebo16.03.3
Tadalafil15.57.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Question 2 of the Patient Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary at Week 12 in Percentage of Yes Responses

"Assessed was the mean change from baseline in the percentage of Yes responses to the SEP diary Question 2. Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina? Data are presented as the mean percentage of yes responses per participant." (NCT00836693)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionpercentage of yes responses (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12 Change
Placebo59.911.6
Tadalafil60.123.2

[back to top]

Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary, Question 3 Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Percentage of Yes Responses

"Assessed was the mean change from baseline in the percentage of Yes responses to the SEP diary Question 3. Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse? Data are presented as the mean percentage of yes responses per participant." (NCT00836693)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of yes responses (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12 Change
Placebo32.219.3
Tadalafil28.239.4

[back to top]

"Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 5 Percentage of Yes Responses"

"Assessed was the mean change from baseline in the percentage of Yes responses to the SEP diary Question 5. Were you satisfied overall with this sexual experience? Data are presented as the mean percentage of yes responses per participant." (NCT00836693)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of yes responses (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12 Change
Placebo12.918.5
Tadalafil10.343.2

[back to top]

Global Assessment Question (GAQ) Question 2 at 12 Week Endpoint

GAQ Question 2: Choose the one number which best describes how you perceive your sexual life is now, compared to how it was before you began taking medication in this study. Responses range from 1=very much better to 7=very much worse. (NCT00836693)
Timeframe: Week 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very Much BetterMuch BetterLittle BetterNo ChangeA Little WorseMuch WorseVery Much WorseMissing
Placebo51117274302
Tadalafil404928173414

[back to top]

Global Assessment Question (GAQ) Question 1 at 12 Week Endpoint

GAQ Question 1: Choose the one number which best describes how you perceive your ability to achieve and maintain your erections now, compared to how it was before you began taking medication in this study. Responses range from 1=very much better to 7=very much worse. (NCT00836693)
Timeframe: Week 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very Much BetterMuch BetterLittle BetterNo ChangeA Little WorseMuch WorseVery Much WorseMissing
Placebo7819245312
Tadalafil494129145424

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events

Assessment of Treatment-related Side Effects. Number of participants experiencing adverse events (NCT00843635)
Timeframe: From Day 1 to Day 20

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm A - 10mg4
Arm B - Tadalafil 20mg10
Arm C - Placebo3

[back to top]

Ratio of MDSC Concentration in the Blood

Ratio of the number of Myeloid Derived Suppressor Cells (MDSC) in the Blood, per treatment group, from Baseline to End of Treatment at Time of Surgery. (NCT00843635)
Timeframe: Baseline, End of Treatment at time of Surgery

Interventionratio from baseline (Median)
Arm A - Tadalafil 10mg0.7680
Arm B - Tadalafil 20mg0.7919
Arm C - Placebo0.9876

[back to top]

Ratio of T-reg Cell Concentration in the Blood

Ratio of the number of regulatory T cells in the blood, per treatment group, from Baseline to End of Treatment at Time of Surgery.. (NCT00843635)
Timeframe: Baseline, End of Treatment at Time of Surgery

Interventionratio from baseline (Median)
Arm A - Tadalafil 10mg0.7776
Arm B - Tadalafil 20mg0.6789
Arm C - Placebo0.8421

[back to top]

Ratio of Tumor-specific T-cell Concentration in the Blood

Ratio of the number of tumor specific T cells in the blood, per treatment group, from Baseline to End of Treatment at Time of Surgery. (NCT00843635)
Timeframe: Baseline, End of Treatment at Time of Surgery

Interventionratio from baseline (Median)
Arm A - Tadalafil 10mg1.7401
Arm B - Tadalafil 20mg1.9020
Arm C - Placebo1.0933

[back to top]

International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Change From Baseline

Change from baseline to endpoint in IPSS Score. The IPSS Total Score is obtained by combining the scores of the responses to 1 through 7 component questions. Each question is scored from 0-5 for an IPSS range of 0-35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. (NCT00848081)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline
Placebo13.3-1.49
Tadalafil13.87-2.28

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Positive Orthostatic Vital Signs Test; Shift From Any Pre-Randomization to Any Post-Randomization Visit

A positive orthostatic test is defined as at least one of the following 4 criteria being met at any pre-randomization or post-randomization visit: (1) reduction in systolic blood pressure of >= 20 mmHg from the supine to standing position;(2)reduction in diastolic blood pressure of >=10 mmHg from the supine to standing position;(3)increase in heart rate of >= 20 bpm from the supine to standing position; or (4)Unable to remain standing. A negative orthostatic test is defined as none of the above 4 criteria (1, 2, 3, or 4) being met at any pre-randomization or post-randomization visit. (NCT00848081)
Timeframe: Baseline through 12 Weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Positive Pre-Random. to Negative Post-Random.Negative Pre-Random. to Positive Post-Random.Positive Pre-Random. to Positive Post-Random.Negative Pre-Random. to Negative Post-Random.
Placebo222114101
Tadalafil151916106

[back to top]

Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR) Change From Baseline

Change from baseline to endpoint in PVR volume. PVR is obtained by measuring with ultrasound the remaining urine in the bladder after urination. (NCT00848081)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

,
Interventionmilliliters (Mean)
Baseline valuesChange from Baseline
Placebo70.7-1.9
Tadalafil80.3-8.1

[back to top]

Uroflowmetry (Qmax) Change From Baseline

Change from baseline to endpoint in Qmax. Qmax is defined as the peak urine flow rate (measured in milliliters per second [mL/second] using standard calibrated flowmeter). (NCT00848081)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

,
Interventionmilliliters per second (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline
Placebo12.80.6
Tadalafil11.80.6

[back to top]

Number of Men With Treatment-emergent Dizziness

The primary safety measure is the proportion (reported in numbers) of subjects experiencing treatment-emergent dizziness to include the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) preferred terms of dizziness, dizziness postural, and procedural dizziness. Treatment-emergent dizziness is defined as any of the predefined terms of dizziness that is first reported or worsens in severity after baseline. (NCT00848081)
Timeframe: Baseline through 12 Weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Placebo9
Tadalafil11

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function - Overall Satisfaction Domain at Week 12 Endpoint

Self-reported overall satisfaction over the past 4 weeks. Calculated as the sum of IIEF Questions 13 and 14. Each question is scored from 1 through 5, with a possible total score of 2 through 10. Higher scores represent greater satisfaction. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment group, region, baseline covariate, baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00855582)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg1.8
Tadalafil 5 mg2.4
Placebo0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score Nocturia Question at Week 12

The IPSS Nocturia question (Question 7) measures the number of times needed to get up at night to urinate. Scores range from 0 (none) to 5 (5 or more times). Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment group, region, baseline covariate, baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00855582)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg-0.5
Tadalafil 5 mg-0.6
Placebo-0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Uroflowmetry Parameters - Peak Urine Flow Rate (Qmax) at Week 12 Endpoint

Qmax is defined as the peak urine flow rate (measured in milliliters per second [mL/sec] using standard calibrated flowmeter). At each visit, a uroflowmetry assessment was considered valid and the data were included in the statistical analyses only if the prevoid total bladder volume (assessed by ultrasound) was >=150 to <=550 milliliters (mL) and the voided volume (Vcomp) was >= 125 mL. (NCT00855582)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

InterventionmL/sec (Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg1.7
Tadalafil 5 mg1.6
Placebo1.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function Question 3 at Week 12 Endpoint

IIEF Question 3 asks how often a subject was able to penetrate his partner over the past 4 weeks. Scores range from 0 (did not attempt intercourse) to 5 (almost always or always). Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment group, region, baseline covariate, baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00855582)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg0.9
Tadalafil 5 mg1.1
Placebo0.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function - Intercourse Satisfaction Domain at Week 12 Endpoint

Self-reported intercourse satisfaction over the past 4 weeks. Calculated as the sum of IIEF Questions 6, 7 and 8. Each question is scored from 0 through 5 with a possible total score of 0 through 15. Higher score represent greater satisfaction. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment group, region, baseline covariate, baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00855582)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg1.6
Tadalafil 5 mg2.0
Placebo0.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) Domain Score at Week 12 Endpoint (5 mg)

Self-reported erectile function over the past 4 weeks. Questions 1-5 were scored from 0-5, and Question 15 from 1 to 5. Erectile Function Domain scores range from 1 to 30; lower numerical scores represent greater severity of erectile dysfunction. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment group, region, baseline covariate, baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00855582)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil 5 mg6.5
Placebo1.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary Question 5

"Assessed as the mean change from baseline in the percentage of Yes responses to the SEP diary Question 5, Were you satisfied overall with this sexual experience? Data are presented as the mean percentage of yes responses per the number of sexual attempts for a participant during a study period. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment group, region, baseline covariate, baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction." (NCT00855582)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage of yes responses (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg23.7
Tadalafil 5 mg38.2
Placebo9.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary Question 4 at Week 12 Endpoint

"Assessed as the mean change from baseline in the percentage of Yes responses to the SEP diary Question 4, Were you satisfied with the hardness of your erection? Data are presented as the mean percentage of yes responses per the number of sexual attempts for a participant during a study period. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment group, region, baseline covariate, baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction." (NCT00855582)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage of yes responses (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg26.6
Tadalafil 5 mg39.4
Placebo9.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function Question 4 at Week 12 Endpoint

IIEF Question 4 asks whether how often a subject was able to maintain an erection after penetration over the past 4 weeks. Scores range from 0 (did not attempt intercourse) to 5 (almost always or always). Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment group, region, baseline covariate, baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00855582)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg0.9
Tadalafil 5 mg1.3
Placebo0.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary Question 3 at Week 12 Endpoint (5 mg)

"Assessed as the mean change from baseline in the percentage of Yes responses to the SEP diary Question 3, Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse? Data are presented as the mean percentage of Yes responses per the number of sexual attempts for a participant during a study period. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment group, region, baseline covariate, baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction." (NCT00855582)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage of Yes responses (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil 5 mg31.7
Placebo12.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary Question 2 at Week 12 Endpoint

"Assessed as the mean change from baseline in the percentage of Yes responses to the SEP diary Question 2, Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina? Data are presented as the mean percentage of yes responses per the number of sexual attempts for a participant during a study period. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment group, region, baseline covariate, baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction." (NCT00855582)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage of yes responses (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg21.4
Tadalafil 5 mg25.1
Placebo9.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Uroflowmetry Parameters - Voided Volume (Vcomp) at Week 12 Endpoint

Vcomp is defined as the volume of urine voided (measures in mL using a standard calibrated flowmeter). At each visit, a uroflowmetry assessment was considered valid and the data were included in the statistical analyses only if the prevoid total bladder volume (assessed by ultrasound) was >=150 to <=550 milliliters (mL) and the voided volume (Vcomp) was >= 125 mL. (NCT00855582)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

InterventionmL (Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg18.5
Tadalafil 5 mg13.3
Placebo11.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) Domain Score at Week 12 Endpoint (2.5 mg)

Self-reported erectile function over the past 4 weeks. Questions 1-5 were scored from 0-5, and Question 15 from 1 to 5. Erectile Function Domain scores range from 1 to 30; lower numerical scores represent greater severity of erectile dysfunction. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment group, region, baseline covariate, baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00855582)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg5.2
Placebo1.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in BPH Impact Index (BII) at Week 12 Endpoint (2.5 mg)

The BII is a 4-item, self-administered questionnaire evaluating impact of urinary problems on overall health and activity. Total scores range from 0 to 13; higher scores represent increased perceived impact of benign prostatic hyperplasia-lower urinary tract symptoms on overall health. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment group, region, baseline covariate, baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00855582)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg-1.6
Placebo-1.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Impact Index (BII) at Week 12 Endpoint (5 mg)

The BII is a 4-item, self-administered questionnaire evaluating impact of urinary problems on overall health and activity. Total scores range from 0 to 13; higher scores represent increased perceived impact of benign prostatic hyperplasia-lower urinary tract symptoms on overall health. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment group, region, baseline covariate, baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00855582)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil 5 mg-2.1
Placebo-1.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary Question 3 at Week 12 Endpoint (2.5 mg)

"Assessed as the mean change from baseline in the percentage of Yes responses to the SEP diary Question 3, Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse? Data are presented as the mean percentage of yes responses per the number of sexual attempts for a participant during a study period. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment group, region, baseline covariate, baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction." (NCT00855582)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage of yes responses (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg24.6
Placebo12.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) Domain at Week 4 and Week 8 Endpoint

Self-reported erectile function over the past 4 weeks. Questions 1-5 were scored from 0-5, and Question 15 from 1 to 5. Erectile Function Domain scores range from 1 to 30; lower numerical scores represent greater severity of erectile dysfunction. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment group, region, baseline covariate, baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00855582)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 Change (n=186, 197, 183)Week 8 Change (n=176, 192, 178)
Placebo1.01.8
Tadalafil 2.5 mg4.24.9
Tadalafil 5 mg6.16.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Uroflowmetry Parameters - Mean Urine Flow Rate (Qmean) at Week 12 Endpoint

Qmean is defined as the average urine flow rate (measured in milliliters per second [mL/second] using standard calibrated flowmeter). At each visit, a uroflowmetry assessment was considered valid and the data were included in the statistical analyses only if the prevoid total bladder volume (assessed by ultrasound) was >=150 to <=550 milliliters (mL) and the voided volume (Vcomp) was >= 125 mL. (NCT00855582)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

InterventionmL/sec (Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg1.0
Tadalafil 5 mg0.9
Placebo0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 12 Endpoint (5 mg)

The total IPSS is obtained by combining the scores of the responses to component questions 1 through 7. Each question is scored from 0-5 for a total IPSS range of 0-35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment group, region, baseline covariate, baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00855582)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil 5 mg-6.1
Placebo-3.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 12 Endpoint (2.5 mg)

The total IPSS is obtained by combining the scores of the responses to component questions 1 through 7. Each question is scored from 0-5 for a total IPSS range of 0-35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment group, region, baseline covariate, baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00855582)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg-4.6
Placebo-3.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Modified IPSS (mIPSS) at Week 2 Endpoint

The Modified IPSS is the total IPSS collected at 2 weeks post-baseline. The total IPSS is obtained by combining the scores of the responses to component questions 1 through 7. Each question is scored from 0-5 for a total IPSS range of 0-35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from ANCOVA. The model includes terms for treatment group, region, baseline covariate, baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00855582)
Timeframe: Baseline, 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg-2.8
Tadalafil 5 mg-4.0
Placebo-2.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore at Week 12 Endpoint

IPSS obstructive subscore is the sum of Questions 1, 3, 5 and 6 of the IPSS questionnaire. The obstructive subscore ranges from 0 to 20 with a higher score representing greater obstruction. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment group, region, baseline covariate, baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00855582)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg-2.7
Tadalafil 5 mg-3.6
Placebo-2.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score Storage (Irritative) Subscore at Week 12 Endpoint

IPSS irritative subscore is the sum of Questions 2, 4 and 7 of the IPSS questionnaire. The irritative subscore ranges from 0 to 15 with a higher score representing more irritative symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment group, region, baseline covariate, baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00855582)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg-1.9
Tadalafil 5 mg-2.5
Placebo-1.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score Quality of Life (QoL) at Week 12 Endpoint

Assessment of quality of life (QoL) by urinary symptoms, with scores ranging from 0 (delighted) to 6 (terrible). Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment group, region, baseline covariate, baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00855582)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil 2.5 mg-0.9
Tadalafil 5 mg-1.0
Placebo-0.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in BPH Impact Index (BII) at Week 4 and 8 Endpoint

The BII is a 4-item, self-administered questionnaire evaluating impact of urinary problems on overall health and activity. Total scores range from 0 to 13; higher scores represent increased perceived impact of benign prostatic hyperplasia-lower urinary tract symptoms on overall health. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment group, region, baseline covariate, baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00855582)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 Change (n=186, 197, 183)Week 8 Change (n=175, 192, 177)
Placebo-0.7-1.2
Tadalafil 2.5 mg-1.0-1.4
Tadalafil 5 mg-1.5-1.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 4 and Week 8 Endpoint

The total IPSS is obtained by combining the scores of the responses to component questions 1 through 7. Each question is scored from 0-5 for a total IPSS range of 0-35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment group, region, baseline covariate, baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00855582)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 Change (n=184, 197, 183)Week 8 Change (n=174, 192, 178)
Placebo-2.6-3.8
Tadalafil 2.5 mg-3.4-4.5
Tadalafil 5 mg-5.5-5.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary Question 3 at Week 4 and Week 8 Endpoint

"Assessed as the mean change from baseline in the percentage of Yes responses to the SEP diary Question 3, Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse? Data are presented as the mean percentage of yes responses per the number of sexual attempts for a participant during a study period. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment group, region, baseline covariate, baseline-by-treatment interaction and treatment-by-region interaction." (NCT00855582)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks

,,
Interventionpercentage of yes responses (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 Change (n=180, 190, 180)Week 8 Change (n=172, 187, 171)
Placebo6.210.9
Tadalafil 2.5 mg22.322.9
Tadalafil 5 mg30.731.7

[back to top]

Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12 Endpoint

A scale that measures clinician's rating of the total change in the patient's urinary symptoms at endpoint compared with the start of treatment. Scores range from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse).The data are presented as the number of participants in each of the seven categories: very much better (1); much better (2); a little better (3); no change (4); a little worse (5); much worse (6); very much worse (7). (NCT00855582)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very Much WorseMuch WorseA Little WorseNo ChangeA Little BetterMuch BetterVery Much Better
Placebo1496458453
Tadalafil 2.5 mg0284167567
Tadalafil 5 mg01242607814

[back to top]

Erectile Function General Assessment Questionnaire (EF-GAQ)

The EF-GAQ consisted of two questions: (1) Has the treatment you have been taking during this study improved your erections? and (2) If yes, has the treatment improved your ability to engage in sexual activity? Each question has a Yes/No response. (NCT00855582)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants with yes response (Number)
Question 1Question 2
Placebo7467
Tadalafil 2.5 mg135126
Tadalafil 5 mg155146

[back to top]

Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12 Endpoint

A scale that measures the patient's perception of urinary symptoms at endpoint compared with the start of treatment. The score ranges from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). The data are presented as the number of participants in each of the seven categories: very much better (1); much better (2); a little better (3); no change (4); a little worse (5); much worse (6); very much worse (7). (NCT00855582)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very Much WorseMuch WorseA Little WorseNo ChangeA Little BetterMuch BetterVery Much Better
Placebo14136163376
Tadalafil 2.5 mg031234665713
Tadalafil 5 mg02334796019

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Subscore (Storage [Irritative] and Voiding [Obstructive])

IPSS obstructive subscore is the sum of Questions 1, 3, 5 and 6 of the IPSS questionnaire. Scores range from 0 (few obstructive symptoms) to 5 (frequent obstructive symptoms); 4 questions of the obstructive score range from 0 to 20. IPSS irritative subscore is the sum of Questions 2, 4 and 7 of IPSS questionnaire. Scores range from 0 (no irritative symptoms) to 5 (frequent irritative symptoms); 3 questions of the irritative subscore range from 0 to 15. Least Squares Mean values were controlled for prior alpha blocker use (yes/no), country (Japan/Korea/Taiwan), and baseline value. (NCT00861757)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Voiding (Obstructive) Score (N = 154,151,155,152)Storage (Irritative) Score (N = 154,151,155,152)
0.2 mg Tamsulosin-3.8-1.7
2.5 mg Tadalafil-3.3-1.5
5.0 mg Tadalafil-3.0-1.7
Placebo-1.9-1.1

[back to top]

Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12

The CGI-I measures clinician's perception of patient improvement at the time of assessment compared with the start of treatment. There are 7 categories with scores ranging from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). The data are presented as the number of participants in each of the 7 categories: very much better (1); much better (2); a little better (3); no change (4); a little worse (5); much worse (6); very much worse (7). (NCT00861757)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very Much WorseMuch WorseA Little WorseNo ChangeA Little BetterMuch BetterVery Much Better
0.2 mg Tamsulosin01319684712
2.5 mg Tadalafil23421673911
5.0 mg Tadalafil01329624810
Placebo0384460307

[back to top]

Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12

The PGI-I measures the patient's perception of improvement at the time of assessment compared with the start of treatment. There are 7 categories with scores ranging from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). The data are presented as the number of participants in each of the 7 categories: very much better (1); much better (2); a little better (3); no change (4); a little worse (5); much worse (6); very much worse (7). (NCT00861757)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Very Much WorseMuch WorseA Little WorseNo ChangeA Little BetterMuch BetterVery Much Better
0.2 mg Tamsulosin0142558539
2.5 mg Tadalafil1142662449
5.0 mg Tadalafil10523744010
Placebo23124554324

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (PBH) Impact Index (BII) at 12 Weeks

The BII is a 4-item, self-administered questionnaire evaluating impact of urinary problems on overall health and activity. Total scores range from 0 to 13; higher scores represent increased perceived impact of benign prostatic hyperplasia-lower urinary tract symptoms on overall health. Least Squares Mean values were controlled for BPH severity (moderate/severe), prior alpha blocker use (yes/no), country (Japan/Korea/Taiwan) and baseline value. (NCT00861757)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.8
2.5 mg Tadalafil-1.1
5.0 mg Tadalafil-1.0
0.2 mg Tamsulosin-1.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure (Sitting) at 12 Weeks

(NCT00861757)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks

,,,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Systolic Blood PressureDiastolic Blood Pressure
0.2 mg Tamsulosin0.2-0.6
2.5 mg Tadalafil-2.3-2.5
5.0 mg Tadalafil-0.5-1.4
Placebo0.9-0.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Quality of Life (QoL) at 12 Weeks

"Assessment of QoL by urinary symptoms, with scores ranging from 0 (delighted) to 6 (terrible).~Least Squares Mean values were controlled for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia severity (moderate/severe), prior alpha blocker use (yes/no), country (Japan/Korea/Taiwan), and baseline value." (NCT00861757)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.5
2.5 mg Tadalafil-0.8
5.0 mg Tadalafil-0.8
0.2 mg Tamsulosin-1.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 12 Weeks

"The IPSS Total Score is obtained by combining the scores of the responses to 1 through 7 component questions. Each question is scored from 0-5 for an IPSS range of 0-35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms.~Least Squares Mean values were controlled for prior alpha blocker use (yes/no), country (Japan/Korea/Taiwan) and baseline value." (NCT00861757)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-3.0
2.5 mg Tadalafil-4.8
5 mg Tadalafil-4.7
0.2 mg Tamsulosin-5.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR) at 12 Weeks

The PVR is defined as the volume of urine remaining in the bladder after voiding, estimated by ultrasound. (NCT00861757)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionmilliliter (mL) (Mean)
Placebo-1.20
2.5 mg Tadalafil-0.09
5.0 mg Tadalafil-2.90
0.2 mg Tamsulosin-5.67

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) at 12 Weeks

Nanograms of PSA per milliliter (ng/mL) of blood. (NCT00861757)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionmicrogram/Liter (Mean)
Placebo-0.03
2.5 mg Tadalafil0.04
5.0 mg Tadalafil0.13
0.2 mg Tamsulosin-0.06

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Sitting Heart Rate (HR) at 12 Weeks

(NCT00861757)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionbeats per minute (bpm) (Mean)
Placebo-0.3
2.5 mg Tadalafil0.7
5.0 mg Tadalafil0.6
0.2 mg Tamsulosin0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Uroflowmetry Parameter: Peak Flow Rate (Qmax) at 12 Weeks

"Qmax: defined as the peak urine flow rate (measured in milliliters per second [mL/second] using standard calibrated flowmeter).~Least Squares Mean values were controlled for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) severity (moderate/severe), prior alpha blocker use (yes/no), country (Japan/Korea/Taiwan), and baseline value." (NCT00861757)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionmilliliter per second (mL/sec) (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo2.1
2.5 mg Tadalafil1.6
5.0 mg Tadalafil1.3
0.2 mg Tamsulosin2.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure (Standing) at 12 Weeks

(NCT00861757)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks

,,,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Systolic Blood PressureDiastolic Blood Pressure
0.2 mg Tamsulosin-0.9-1.0
2.5 mg Tadalafil-2.9-2.3
5.0 mg Tadalafil0.6-1.7
Placebo0.80.4

[back to top]

Change in Immune Response After Tadalafil Administration

Median fold-change in immune response of T-cell expansion, delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions, CD4/CD69, CD8/CD69. A positive value indicates an increase in immune response. (NCT00894413)
Timeframe: Change from baseline to up to 14 days post-intervention

,
Interventionfold change (Median)
T-cell expansionDTH areaCD4/CD69CD8/CD69
Placebo1.131.140.900.93
Tadalafil1.594.741.291.14

[back to top]

Overall Sexual Function as Measured by Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)

The IIEF is a validated 15-item for measuring patient-reported erectile function. A score of 0-5 is given to each of the 15 questions that examine 5 main domains of male sexual function: erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction, and overall satisfaction. Domain scores are the sum of each item. The erectile function domain has 5 items with a score range of 1-30, orgasmic function has 2 items with a score range of 0-10, sexual desire has 2 items with a score range of 0-10, intercourse satisfaction has 3 items with a score range of 0-15, and overall satisfaction has 2 items with a score range of 2-10. Total score ranges from 0-70, with higher scores indicated better functioning. Change from baseline is calculated by subtracting baseline score from score at the time point of interest. (NCT00931528)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 30, and years 1 and 2 from start of treatment

,
Interventionchange in total IIEF (Mean)
Week 30Year 1Year 2
Placebo-9.0-10.5-14.1
Tadalafil-8.2-9.5-9.7

[back to top]

Partner Marital Adjustment as Measured by the Locke's Marital Adjustment Test

The Locke Marital Adjustment Test (LMAT) is a 16-item questionnaire with scores ranging from 48 to 138 for participants. Higher scores indicate greater sexual function, sexual wellbeing, or marital adjustment. The change in LMAT score is calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the follow-up score. (NCT00931528)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 30 and years 1 and 2 after the start of treatment

,
Interventionchange in LMAT score (Mean)
Week 30Year 1Year 2
Placebo-2.61.2-4.7
Tadalafil-1.5-2.3-2.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Maintaining Spontaneous (Off-drug) Erectile Function (EF) at Weeks 28-30 After Initiation of Radiation Therapy (RT)

"EF is measured by Question 1 of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). The IIEF is a validated 15-item for measuring patient-reported erectile function. Question 1 asks How often were you able to get an erection during sexual activity? Responses ranged from 0=no sexual activity, to 5=Almost always or always. Higher scores indicated better functioning. All patients have erectile function prior to initiation of RT, indicated by a score of 3, 4, or 5 on IIEF Q1. Patients with a lower IIEF Q1 score at weeks 28-30 than at baseline will have less erectile function and be categorized as nonresponders. Patients with similar or improved erectile function will be categorized as responders (maintaining). Patient-related predictors of at erectile function at this time point are also reported with this outcome measure." (NCT00931528)
Timeframe: Baseline and 30 weeks from the start of radiation therapy

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tadalafil79
Placebo74

[back to top]

Patient Marital Adjustment as Measured by the Locke's Marital Adjustment Test

The Locke Marital Adjustment Test (LMAT) is a 16-item questionnaire with scores ranging from 48 to 138 for participants. Higher scores indicate greater sexual function, sexual wellbeing, or marital adjustment. The change in LMAT score is calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the follow-up score. (NCT00931528)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 30 and years 1 and 2 after the start of treatment

,
Interventionchange in LMAT score (Mean)
Week 30Year 1Year 2
Placebo-2.6-1.9-1.4
Tadalafil-3.5-1.9-1.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Maintaining Spontaneous (Off-drug) EF at Years 1 and 2 After Initiation of RT

"The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) is a validated 15-item for measuring patient-reported erectile function. Question 1 asks How often were you able to get an erection during sexual activity? Responses ranged from 0=no sexual activity, to 5=Almost always or always. Higher scores indicated better functioning. All patients have erectile function prior to initiation of RT, indicated by a score of 3, 4, or 5. Patients with a lower IIEF Q1 score at weeks 28-30 than at baseline will have less erectile function and be categorized as nonresponders. Patients with similar or improved erectile function will be categorized as responders (maintaining). Patient-related predictors of at erectile function at Years 1 and 2 are also reported with this outcome measure." (NCT00931528)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 and 2 years from the start of tadalafil or placebo

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Year 1Year 2
Placebo71.463.3
Tadalafil72.268.4

[back to top]

Overall Patient Sexual Satisfaction as Measured by Change From Baseline in the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire (SAQ) Score

The Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire (SAQ) is a 20-item questionnaire with an overall score range between 8 and 100 including the following domains: desire, ranging between 5 and 30; dysfunction, 0 and 25; activity, 0 and 10; satisfaction, 1 and 10; and fatigue, 1 and 5. The change in SAQ score is calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the follow-up score. A positive change indicates an improvement in sexual well-being. (NCT00931528)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 30 and years 1 and 2 after the start of treatment

,
Interventionchange in SAQ score (Mean)
Week 30Year 1Year 2
Placebo-2.9-4.9-4.6
Tadalafil-2.0-3.7-3.4

[back to top]

Overall Partner Sexual Satisfaction as Measured by Change From Baseline in the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire-Partner (SAQ-P) Score

The SAQ-P is an 18-item questionnaire with an overall score range between 0 and 90 including the following domains: desire, dysfunction, activity, satisfaction, and fatigue. The change in SAQ score is calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the follow-up score. A positive change indicates an improvement in sexual well-being. (NCT00931528)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 30 and years 1 and 2 after the start of treatment

,
Interventionchange in SAQ score (Mean)
Week 30Year 1Year 2
Placebo-1.8-2.55.1
Tadalafil-4.9-3.91.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Modified International Prostate Symptom Score (mIPSS) at 1 Week

The mIPSS Total Score covered a time period of 1 week and was obtained by combining scores of responses to Component Questions 1-7. Each question was scored from 0-5 for an mIPSS range of 0-35 points; higher numerical scores represented greater severity of symptoms. Least Squares (LS) Mean of change from baseline to endpoint (Week 1 or last post-baseline value carried forward) was from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and adjusted for treatment group, region, centered-baseline covariate, centered-baseline-by-treatment interaction, and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00970632)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 week

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-2.5
Tadalafil 5 mg-4.0
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg-4.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Peak Urine Flow Rate (Q-Max) at 12 Weeks

Q-max (peak urine flow rate) was measured in milliliters per second (mL/sec) using a standard calibrated flowmeter. At each visit, a uroflowmetry assessment was considered valid and data were included in the analyses only if the prevoid total bladder volume (assessed by ultrasound) was ≥150 to ≤550 mL and the voided volume (V-comp) was ≥125 mL. (NCT00970632)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionmilliliters per second (mL/sec) (Median)
Placebo0.3
Tadalafil 5 mg1.6
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg1.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR) at 12 Weeks

PVR was the amount of urine remaining in the bladder after void completion. (NCT00970632)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionmilliliter (mL) (Median)
Placebo0.0
Tadalafil 5 mg-1.0
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg-5.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 12 Weeks

The IPSS Total Score was obtained by combining the scores of the responses to Component Questions 1-7. Each question was scored from 0-5 for an IPSS range of 0-35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represented greater severity of symptoms. Least Squares (LS) Mean of change from baseline to endpoint (Week 12 or last post-baseline value carried forward) was from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and adjusted for treatment group, region, centered-baseline covariate, centered-baseline-by-treatment interaction, and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00970632)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-4.2
Tadalafil 5 mg-6.3
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg-5.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 4 Weeks

The IPSS Total Score was obtained by combining the scores of the responses to Component Questions 1-7. Each question was scored from 0-5 for an IPSS range of 0-35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represented greater severity of symptoms. Least Squares (LS) Mean of change from baseline to endpoint (Week 4 or last post-baseline value carried forward) was from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and adjusted for treatment group, region, centered-baseline covariate, centered-baseline-by-treatment interaction, and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00970632)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-3.3
Tadalafil 5 mg-5.5
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg-5.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Volume of Voided Urine (V-Comp) at 12 Weeks

V-comp (volume of urine voided) was measured in milliliters (mL) using a standard calibrated flowmeter. At each visit, a uroflowmetry assessment was considered valid and data were included in the analyses only if the prevoid total bladder volume (assessed by ultrasound) was ≥150 to ≤550 mL and V-comp was ≥125 mL. (NCT00970632)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionmilliliter (mL) (Median)
Placebo0.0
Tadalafil 5 mg11.0
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg16.0

[back to top]

Treatment Satisfaction Scale - Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (TSS-BPH) at 12 Weeks: Overall

The TSS-BPH was a validated participant-rated instrument that measured participant satisfaction with treatment based on a 13-item questionnaire. The overall TSS-BPH score was converted to a percentage of the maximum value possible (percent ranged from 0-100) with lower scores indicating greater satisfaction. (NCT00970632)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Placebo28.9
Tadalafil 5 mg22.2
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg28.9

[back to top]

Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at 12 Weeks

"The CGI-I was an investigator-rated instrument that measured improvement or worsening of the participant's symptoms based on a 7-point scale. A score of 1=participant felt symptoms were very much better; score of 2=participant felt symptoms were much better; score of 3=participant felt symptoms were a little better; score of 4=participant felt no change in symptoms; score of 5=participant felt symptoms were a little worse; score of 6=participant felt symptoms were much worse; score of 7=participant felt symptoms were very much worse." (NCT00970632)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very much worseMuch worseA little worseNo changeA little betterMuch betterVery much better
Placebo1265157349
Tadalafil 5 mg02532585016
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg0174065386

[back to top]

Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at 12 Weeks

"The PGI-I was a participant-rated instrument that measured the improvement or worsening of the participant's symptoms based on a 7-point scale at Week 12. A score of 1=participant felt symptoms were very much better; score of 2=participant felt symptoms were much better; score of 3=participant felt symptoms were a little better; score of 4=participant felt no change in symptoms; score of 5=participant felt symptoms were a little worse; score of 6=participant felt symptoms were much worse; score of 7=participant felt symptoms were very much worse." (NCT00970632)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very much worseMuch worseA little worseNo changeA little betterMuch betterVery much better
Placebo22451533611
Tadalafil 5 mg01628525617
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg00836554810

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index (BII) at 12 Weeks

BII was a 4-item, self-administered questionnaire evaluating impact of urinary problems on overall health and activity. Total scores ranged from 0-13; higher scores represented increased perceived impact of BPH-lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) on overall health. Least Squares (LS) Mean of change from baseline to endpoint (Week 12 or last post-baseline value carried forward) was from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and adjusted for treatment group, region, centered-baseline covariate, centered-baseline-by-treatment interaction, and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00970632)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.9
Tadalafil 5 mg-1.7
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg-1.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Erectile Function (EF) Domain at 12 Weeks

IIEF measured self-reported EF over the past 4 weeks. Scores ranged from 0 (low or no EF)-5 (high EF) on 6 questions (1-5, 15 of the IIEF). Total EF Domain scores ranged from 1-30. Least Squares (LS) Mean of change from baseline to endpoint (Week 12 or last post-baseline value carried forward) was from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and adjusted for treatment group, region, centered-baseline covariate, centered-baseline-by-treatment interaction, and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00970632)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo2.1
Tadalafil 5 mg6.0
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg1.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Nocturia Question at 12 Weeks

The IPSS nocturia question (Component Question 7) measured nocturia (need to urinate at night) over the past 4 weeks. Scores ranged from 0 (no episodes of nocturia)-5 (5 or more episodes of nocturia). Least Squares (LS) Mean of change from baseline to endpoint (Week 12 or last post-baseline value carried forward) was from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and adjusted for treatment group, region, centered-baseline covariate, centered-baseline-by-treatment interaction, and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00970632)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.3
Tadalafil 5 mg-0.5
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg-0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Quality of Life (QoL) Index at 12 Weeks

IPSS QoL assessed QoL by urinary symptoms, with scores ranging from 0 (delighted)-6 (terrible). Least Squares (LS) Mean of change from baseline to endpoint (Week 12 or last post-baseline value carried forward) was from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and adjusted for treatment group, region, centered-baseline covariate, centered-baseline-by-treatment interaction, and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00970632)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.0
Tadalafil 5 mg-1.3
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg-1.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Storage (Irritative) Subscore at 12 Weeks

IPSS storage (irritative) subscore was the sum of Component Questions 2, 4 and 7 of the IPSS questionnaire. Scores ranged from 0 (no irritative symptoms) to 5 (frequent irritative symptoms); therefore, the 3 questions of the irritative subscore ranged from 0 to 15. Least Squares (LS) Mean of change from baseline to endpoint (Week 12 or last post-baseline value carried forward) was from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and adjusted for treatment group, region, centered-baseline covariate, centered-baseline-by-treatment interaction, and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00970632)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.6
Tadalafil 5 mg-2.2
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg-2.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index (BII) at 4 Weeks

BII was a 4-item, self-administered questionnaire evaluating impact of urinary problems on overall health and activity. Total scores ranged from 0-13; higher scores represented increased perceived impact of BPH-lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) on overall health. Least Squares (LS) Mean of change from baseline to endpoint (Week 4 or last post-baseline value carried forward) was from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and adjusted for treatment group, region, centered-baseline covariate, centered-baseline-by-treatment interaction, and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00970632)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.4
Tadalafil 5 mg-1.2
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg-1.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore at 12 Weeks.

IPSS voiding (obstructive) subscore was the sum of Component Questions 1, 3, 5 and 6 of the IPSS questionnaire. Scores ranged from 0 (no obstructive symptoms)-5 (frequent obstructive symptoms); therefore, the 4 questions of the obstructive score ranged from 0-20. Least Squares (LS) Mean of change from baseline to endpoint (Week 12 or last post-baseline value carried forward) was from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and adjusted for treatment group, region, centered-baseline covariate, centered-baseline-by-treatment interaction, and treatment-by-region interaction. (NCT00970632)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-2.6
Tadalafil 5 mg-4.1
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg-3.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Urine Flow Rate (Q-Mean) at 12 Weeks

Q-mean (mean urine flow rate) was measured in milliliters per second (mL/sec) using a standard calibrated flowmeter. At each visit, a uroflowmetry assessment was considered valid and data were included in the analyses only if the prevoid total bladder volume (assessed by ultrasound) was ≥150 to ≤550 mL and the voided volume (V-comp) was >=125 mL. (NCT00970632)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionmilliliters per second (mL/sec) (Median)
Placebo0.10
Tadalafil 5 mg1.25
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg0.70

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 'Yes' Answers to Morning Erections

"The participants were asked to complete the morning erections diary every morning during the 4-week period before randomization and during the 6-week, Drug-Free, Washout Period. Data presented are the changes in the participant's percentage of yes responses relative to the number of days the question was answered during treatment. The analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to calculate Least Square (LS) mean and 95% confidence interval (CI). LS mean values are adjusted for treatment, baseline morning erections frequency, age group and country." (NCT01026818)
Timeframe: Randomization (Baseline), Month 10.5

Intervention"percentage of yes response" (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil 5 mg OaD8.92
Tadalafil 20 mg PRN12.16
Placebo14.04

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Score of Greater Than or Equal to 22 in the International Index of Erectile Function- Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) Domain

Self-reported erectile function during the past 4 weeks. IIEF- EF is the sum of Questions 1-5 and 15 of the IIEF. Questions 1-5 are scored 0 (no sexual activity for Question 1, no sexual stimulation for Question 2 and did not attempt intercourse for Questions 3-5) to 5 (high erectile function) and Question 15 is scored 1 (very low confidence) to 5 (very high confidence), for a total score ranging from 1 to 30. Higher scores represent better erectile function. Data presented are the percentage of participants with an IIEF-EF Total Score greater than or equal to (≥) 22. (NCT01026818)
Timeframe: Month 9 and Month 13.5

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 9Month 13.5
Placebo14.227.0
Tadalafil 20 mg PRN19.733.1
Tadalafil 5 mg OaD25.232.4

[back to top]

Residual Erectile Function (REF) at Month 10.5

The participant is asked to rate the hardness of his erection using a 5-point grading system, with 0 (penis does not enlarge), 1 (penis is larger but not hard), 2 (penis is hard but not enough for penetration), 3 (penis is hard enough for penetration but not completely hard), 4 (penis is completely hard and fully rigid.) (NCT01026818)
Timeframe: Month 10.5

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
REF = 0REF = 1REF = 2REF = 3REF = 4Missing
Placebo22291922142
Tadalafil 20 mg PRN17302331106
Tadalafil 5 mg OaD13292522124

[back to top]

Residual Erectile Function (REF) at Month 13.5

The participant is asked to rate the hardness of his erection using a 5-point grading system, with 0 (penis does not enlarge), 1 (penis is larger but not hard), 2 (penis is hard but not enough for penetration), 3 (penis is hard enough for penetration but not completely hard), 4 (penis is completely hard and fully rigid.) (NCT01026818)
Timeframe: Month 13.5

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
REF = 0REF = 1REF = 2REF = 3REF = 4Missing
Placebo11251528243
Tadalafil 20 mg PRN8202034284
Tadalafil 5 mg OaD5191734214

[back to top]

Residual Erectile Function (REF) at Month 2

The participant is asked to rate the hardness of his erection using a 5-point grading system, with 0 (penis does not enlarge), 1 (penis is larger but not hard), 2 (penis is hard but not enough for penetration), 3 (penis is hard enough for penetration but not completely hard), 4 (penis is completely hard and fully rigid.) (NCT01026818)
Timeframe: Month 2

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
REF = 0REF = 1REF = 2REF = 3REF = 4Missing
Placebo38531915511
Tadalafil 20 mg PRN2751282358
Tadalafil 5 mg OaD28382625913

[back to top]

Residual Erectile Function (REF) at Month 5

The participant is asked to rate the hardness of his erection using a 5-point grading system, with 0 (penis does not enlarge), 1 (penis is larger but not hard), 2 (penis is hard but not enough for penetration), 3 (penis is hard enough for penetration but not completely hard), 4 (penis is completely hard and fully rigid.) (NCT01026818)
Timeframe: Month 5

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
REF = 0REF = 1REF = 2REF = 3REF = 4Missing
Placebo2735271969
Tadalafil 20 mg PRN2139213467
Tadalafil 5 mg OaD12371932158

[back to top]

Residual Erectile Function (REF) at Month 9

The participant is asked to rate the hardness of his erection using a 5-point grading system, with 0 (penis does not enlarge), 1 (penis is larger but not hard), 2 (penis is hard but not enough for penetration), 3 (penis is hard enough for penetration but not completely hard), 4 (penis is completely hard and fully rigid.) (NCT01026818)
Timeframe: Month 9

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
REF = 0REF = 1REF = 2REF = 3REF = 4Missing
Placebo23352318106
Tadalafil 20 mg PRN17283027155
Tadalafil 5 mg OaD112522232013

[back to top]

Standardized Morning Erections Question (SMEQ) Score at Month 13.5

"Participants evaluated the frequency of their morning erections during the past 3-month period by answering the SMEQ (Do you ever wake up with an erection) using a 4-point grading system ranging from 0 (Yes, regularly) to 3 (never)." (NCT01026818)
Timeframe: Month 13.5

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Yes, regularlyLess frequently than in the pastOnly occasionallyNeverMissing
Placebo131827426
Tadalafil 20 mg PRN152430405
Tadalafil 5 mg OaD132231322

[back to top]

Standardized Morning Erections Question (SMEQ) Score at Month 2

"Participants evaluated the frequency of their morning erections during the past 3-month period by answering the SMEQ (Do you ever wake up with an erection) using a 4-point grading system ranging from 0 (Yes, regularly) to 3 (never)." (NCT01026818)
Timeframe: Month 2

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Yes, regularlyLess frequently than in the pastOnly occasionallyNeverMissing
Placebo710268711
Tadalafil 20 mg PRN71531809
Tadalafil 5 mg OaD48417313

[back to top]

Standardized Morning Erections Question (SMEQ) Score at Month 9

"Participants evaluated the frequency of their morning erections during the past 3-month period by answering the SMEQ (Do you ever wake up with an erection) using a 4-point grading system ranging from 0 (Yes, regularly) to 3 (never)." (NCT01026818)
Timeframe: Month 9

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Yes, regularlyLess frequently than in the pastOnly occasionallyNeverMissing
Placebo7927657
Tadalafil 20 mg PRN91926617
Tadalafil 5 mg OaD721363911

[back to top]

Residual Erectile Function (REF) at Baseline

The participant is asked to rate the hardness of his erection using a 5-point grading system, with 0 (penis does not enlarge), 1 (penis is larger but not hard), 2 (penis is hard but not enough for penetration), 3 (penis is hard enough for penetration but not completely hard), 4 (penis is completely hard and fully rigid.) (NCT01026818)
Timeframe: Baseline

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
REF = 0REF = 1REF = 2REF = 3REF = 4Missing
Placebo6447171300
Tadalafil 20 mg PRN6248171122
Tadalafil 5 mg OaD6146181202

[back to top]

Global Assessment Questions (GAQ) Question 1 at Month 9

GAQ Question 1: Choose the one number which best describes how you perceive your ability to achieve and maintain your erections now, compared to how it was before you began taking medication in this study. Responses range from very much better (1) to very much worse (7). (NCT01026818)
Timeframe: Month 9

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very much betterMuch betterA little betterNo changeA little worseMuch worseVery much worseMissing
Placebo49224836149
Tadalafil 20 mg PRN1022322858116
Tadalafil 5 mg OaD912333146811

[back to top]

Global Assessment Question (GAQ) Question 2 at Month 9

GAQ Question 2: Choose the one number which best describes how you perceive your sexual life is now, compared to how it was before you began taking medication in this study. Responses range from very much better (1) to very much worse (7). (NCT01026818)
Timeframe: Month 9

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very much betterMuch betterA little betterNo changeA little worseMuch worseVery much worseMissing
Placebo3111849410119
Tadalafil 20 mg PRN7252627101098
Tadalafil 5 mg OaD712303187910

[back to top]

Global Assessment Question (GAQ) Question 2 at Month 13.5

GAQ Question 2: Choose the one number which best describes how you perceive your sexual life is now, compared to how it was before you began taking medication in this study. Responses range from very much better (1) to very much worse (7). (NCT01026818)
Timeframe: Month 13.5

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very much betterMuch betterA little betterNo changeA little worseMuch worseVery much worseMissing
Placebo142124265745
Tadalafil 20 mg PRN202326245367
Tadalafil 5 mg OaD92920254454

[back to top]

Global Assessment Question (GAQ) Question 1 at Month 13.5

GAQ Question 1: Choose the one number which best describes how you perceive your ability to achieve and maintain your erections now, compared to how it was before you began taking medication in this study. Responses range from very much better (1) to very much worse (7). (NCT01026818)
Timeframe: Month 13.5

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very much betterMuch betterA little BetterNo ChangeA little worseMuch worseVery much worseMissing
Placebo161828262565
Tadalafil 20 mg PRN192527234367
Tadalafil 5 mg OaD132428194354

[back to top]

Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) Questionnaire Mean Score

The EDITS questionnaire is a validated questionnaire consisting of 11 questions evaluating self-reported satisfaction with the erectile dysfunction (ED) treatment. Responses were based on the experiences during the previous 4 weeks. Each question is rated on a scale of 0 (extremely low treatment satisfaction) to 4 (extremely high treatment satisfaction). The EDITS mean score was obtained by adding each individual result for all questions, dividing by the number of questions answered. The mean scores range from 0 (extremely low treatment satisfaction) to 4 (extremely high satisfaction). The Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis was used to calculate Least Squares (LS) mean and 95% Confidence Interval (CI). LS mean values are adjusted for treatment, country, visit, visit-by-treatment, age group, and age group-by-treatment (if significant at p<0.10). (NCT01026818)
Timeframe: Months 9 and 13.5

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Month 9Month 13.5
Placebo1.882.25
Tadalafil 20 mg PRN2.112.38
Tadalafil 5 mg OaD2.212.54

[back to top]

Change in Penile Length and Girth

Measurements were performed with the penis in the flaccid state. The stretched penile length was measured from the tip of the glans to the pubopenile skin junction while applying tension to maximally stretch the penis. The penile circumference at midshaft was measured. All measurements were taken with a paper ruler to the nearest 0.5 centimeter (cm). The analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to calculate Least Square (LS) mean and 95% confidence interval (CI). LS mean values are adjusted for treatment, baseline, age group and country. (NCT01026818)
Timeframe: Randomization (Baseline), Month 9

,,
Interventionmillimeter (mm) (Least Squares Mean)
LengthGirth
Placebo-5.73-2.34
Tadalafil 20 mg PRN-7.260.82
Tadalafil 5 mg OaD-1.530.03

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in the International Index of Erectile Function- Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) Total Score

Self-reported erectile function during the past 4 weeks. IIEF- EF is the sum of Questions 1-5 and 15 of the IIEF. Questions 1-5 are scored 0 (no sexual activity for Question 1, no sexual stimulation for Question 2 and did not attempt intercourse for Questions 3-5) to 5 (high erectile function) and Question 15 is scored 1 (very low confidence) to 5 (very high confidence), for a total score ranging from 1 to 30. Higher scores represent better erectile function. The Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis was used to calculate Least Squares (LS) mean and 95% confidence interval (CI). LS mean values are adjusted for baseline score, treatment, country, visit, visit-by-treatment, age group, and age group-by-treatment (if significant at p<0.10). (NCT01026818)
Timeframe: Randomization (Baseline), Months 9 and 10.5 and 13.5

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Month 9Month 10.5Month 13.5
Placebo4.935.988.97
Tadalafil 20 mg PRN6.535.769.78
Tadalafil 5 mg OaD7.736.2410.60

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Domains (Intercourse Satisfaction Domain, Orgasmic Function Domain, Sexual Desire Domain, Overall Satisfaction Domain)

Self-reported overall satisfaction during past 4 weeks. Orgasmic function score is sum of Questions (Q)9 and 10 of IIEF. Scores range from 0 (no sexual stimulation or intercourse) to 5 (high orgasm) for each Q, total 0 to 10. Sexual desire score is sum of Q11 and 12 of IIEF. Scores range from 1 (low/no desire) to 5 (high desire) for each Q, total 2 to 10. Intercourse satisfaction score is sum of Q6, 7 and 8 of IIEF. Scores range from 0 (no attempts for Q6, did not attempt intercourse for Q7 and no intercourse for Q8) to 5 (high satisfaction) for each Q, total 0 to 15. Overall satisfaction score is sum of Q13 and 14 of IIEF. Scores range from 1 (low/no satisfaction) to 5 (high satisfaction) for each Q, total 2 to 10. Higher total scores for each domain indicate higher function. MMRM analysis was used to calculate LS mean and 95% CI. LS mean values are adjusted for baseline, treatment, country, visit, visit-by-treatment, age group, and age group-by-treatment (if significant at p<0.10). (NCT01026818)
Timeframe: Randomization (Baseline), Months 9 and 10.5 and 13.5

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Orgasmic function - Month 9Orgasmic function - Month 10.5Orgasmic function - Month 13.5Sexual desire - Month 9Sexual desire - Month 10.5Sexual desire - Month 13.5Intercourse satisfaction - Month 9Intercourse satisfaction - Month 10.5Intercourse satisfaction - Month 13.5Overall satisfaction - Month 9Overall satisfaction - Month 10.5Overall satisfaction - Month 13.5
Placebo2.392.483.420.630.550.952.962.724.140.780.721.52
Tadalafil 20 mg PRN2.482.482.900.650.650.893.502.814.080.930.481.57
Tadalafil 5 mg OaD2.762.943.570.650.611.043.893.214.700.970.641.50

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Self Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) Questionnaire Score

The SEAR questionnaire is a participant-reported measure of psychosocial outcomes in men with erectile dysfunction (ED). It consists of 14 items. Sexual Relationship domain consists of 8 items (items 1-8). Items 2-8 are rated on a scale of 1 (Never) to 5 (Always), whereas item 1 is reverse scored (1=Always and 5=Never). The total scores for sexual relationship domain range from 8-40 with higher scores indicating better relationship. Self-Esteem subdomain contains items 9 through 12 rated on a scale of 1 (no/low self-esteem) to 5 (high self-esteem). Total scores for Self-Esteem subscale range from 4-20 with higher scores indicating higher self-esteem. The Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis was used to calculate Least Squares (LS) mean and 95% Confidence Interval (CI). LS mean values are adjusted for baseline domain score, treatment, country, visit, visit-by-treatment, age group, and age group-by-treatment (if significant at p<0.10). (NCT01026818)
Timeframe: Randomization (Baseline), Months 9 and 13.5

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Sexual relationship - Month 9Sexual relationship - Month 13.5Self-esteem - Month 9Self-esteem - Month 13.5
Placebo3.026.720.511.62
Tadalafil 20 mg PRN3.506.680.791.72
Tadalafil 5 mg OaD4.786.900.781.67

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 26-item Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) Questionnaire Score

EPIC-26 (participants) contains 26 items and 5 domains: Urinary Incontinence (Items 1-4), Urinary Irritative/Obstructive (Items 5-8), Bowel (Items 10-15), Sexual (Items 16-21), and Hormonal (Items 22-26). Response options for each EPIC item form a Likert scale, and multi-item scale scores are transformed linearly to a 0 to 100 scale for each domain, with higher scores representing better health-related quality of life. Responses are based on experiences during the previous 4 weeks. The Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis was used to calculate Least Squares (LS) mean and 95% confidence interval (CI). LS mean values are adjusted for baseline domain score, treatment, country, visit, visit-by-treatment, age group, and age group-by-treatment (if significant at p<0.10). (NCT01026818)
Timeframe: Randomization (Baseline), Months 9 and 13.5

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Urinary Incontinence - Month 9Urinary Incontinence - Month 13.5Urinary Irritative/Obstructive - Month 9Urinary Irritative/Obstructive - Month 13.5Bowel - Month 9Bowel - Month 13.5Sexual - Month 9Sexual - Month 13.5Hormonal - Month 9Hormonal - Month 13.5
Placebo30.5935.4412.2612.306.486.7817.9833.37-0.183.01
Tadalafil 20 mg PRN31.1235.5413.2813.826.276.4920.6632.582.722.92
Tadalafil 5 mg OaD34.0837.4113.8313.865.946.8727.5336.551.722.48

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 'Yes' Answers to Questions 1 to 5 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP)

Participant-assessed diary has 5 questions: Question (Q)1: erection achievement, Q2: successful penetration, Q3: successful intercourse, Q4: satisfied with erection, and Q5: satisfied with sexual experience) for each sexual encounter made over a specified period of time. SEP Q1-Q5 scores were determined as the percentage of 'Yes' responses to each of the 5 questions out of all sexual attempts recorded during the time period. The Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis was used to calculate Least Squares (LS) mean and 95% confidence interval (CI). LS mean values are adjusted for treatment, country, visit, visit-by-treatment, age group, and age group-by-treatment (if significant at p<0.10). (NCT01026818)
Timeframe: Randomization (Baseline), Months 9 and 10.5 and 13.5

,,
Intervention"percentage of yes responses" (Least Squares Mean)
Q1 - Month 9Q1 - Month 10.5Q1 - Month 13.5Q2 - Month 9Q2 - Month 10.5Q2 - Month 13.5Q3 - Month 9Q3 - Month 10.5Q3 - Month 13.5Q4 - Month 9Q4 - Month 10.5Q4 - Month 13.5Q5 - Month 9Q5 - Month 10.5Q5 - Month 13.5
Placebo52.5458.8675.2727.6736.2650.1121.6128.5240.7514.3018.8830.5614.0419.1129.38
Tadalafil 20 mg PRN63.8864.2479.7934.2934.9956.0724.0923.0145.8318.1511.7435.6217.7310.5234.96
Tadalafil 5 mg OaD67.4167.7886.1644.0040.8163.4833.6728.7552.4126.1716.9442.0825.4216.2640.81

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Score of Greater Than or Equal to 22 in the Erectile Function (EF) Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Questionnaire

Self-reported erectile function during the past 4 weeks. IIEF- EF is the sum of Questions 1-5 and 15 of the IIEF. Questions 1-5 are scored 0 (no sexual activity for Question 1, no sexual stimulation for Question 2 and did not attempt intercourse for Questions 3-5) to 5 (high erectile function) and Question 15 is scored 1 (very low confidence) to 5 (very high confidence), for a total score ranging from 1 to 30. Higher scores represent better erectile function. Data presented are the percentage of participants with an IIEF-EF Total Score greater than or equal to (≥) 22. (NCT01026818)
Timeframe: Month 10.5

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tadalafil 5 mg OaD20.9
Tadalafil 20 mg PRN16.9
Placebo19.1

[back to top]

6-minute Walk Distance

patients were made to take a walk of normal speed to cover a distance in 6 minutes and distance covered was recorded. This was done at baseline (week o) and then repeated t 36 weeks. (NCT01042158)
Timeframe: baseline and 36 weeks

Interventionmeters (Mean)
Baseline (week 0)Week 36
Tadalafil and Ambrisentan Upfront Therapy343395

[back to top]

Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR)

Change in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR) was ascertained via Right Heart Catheterization (RHC) measurement of the difference between the PVR at baseline and 36 weeks (NCT01042158)
Timeframe: baseline 36 weeks

InterventionWood units (Median)
BaselineAt 36 weeks
Tadalafil and Ambrisentan Upfront Therapy6.93.1

[back to top]

Right Ventricular (RV) Mass

Assessment of change in Right ventricular mass was done via standard volumetric cine images of the right heart at baseline and comparing it to that at the end of 36 weeks using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging studies. (NCT01042158)
Timeframe: baseline and 36 weeks

Interventiongrams (Median)
BaselineAt 36 weeks
Tadalafil and Ambrisentan Upfront Therapy32.528.0

[back to top]

Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (TAPSE)

The extent of displacement of the tricuspid valves, termed as Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (TAPSE) was measured using a trans-thoracic echocardiogram following Right heart catheterization. (NCT01042158)
Timeframe: baseline and 36 weeks

Interventioncm (Mean)
Baseline at week 0week 36
Tadalafil and Ambrisentan Upfront Therapy2.21.65

[back to top]

Reasons for Discontinuation of Randomized Erectile Dysfunction Treatment

The reported reasons for a decision to discontinue from initial randomized treatment prior to Week 24 are reported. Discontinuation of randomized treatment was defined as switching between the 3 study treatments (tadalafil on demand, tadalafil once a day, or sildenafil citrate on demand) or discontinuing from all treatments. A change of dose within the same treatment was not considered as switching of treatment. (NCT01122264)
Timeframe: Baseline through 24 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Slow onset of actionCompleted treatmentLack of efficacy (hardness of erection)Lack of efficacy (duration of erection)Lack of confidence in medication working each timeAdverse eventFeel medication controls my sexual lifeNon-desired spontaneous erectionsTime constraints due to short drug action windowPartner's requestDon't want to take a pill every dayPrefer a pill every day, not on demandParticipant discontinuation from the trialParticipant did not take any study drugParticipants without discontinuation event
Sildenafil Citrate On Demand10155242167011302814189
Tadalafil On Demand51467371210020112146
Tadalafil Once a Day9155115100402270110122

[back to top]

Patterns of Erectile Dysfunction Treatment Change

Results are reported as the number of participants per sequence of study medications (tadalafil on demand, tadalafil once a day, or sildenafil citrate on demand) that were taken as a result of switching treatments. The Other Treatment Sequence reports the number of participants per sequence of study medications that were taken as a result of switching treatments more than once. The number of participants who did not switch is also reported. (NCT01122264)
Timeframe: Baseline through 24 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
No Treatment IntakeNo SwitchFrom Once a Day to Any On DemandFrom Any On Demand to Once a DayFrom Any On Demand to Any On DemandReturning Back to Randomized TreatmentOther Treatment Sequence
Entire Study Population34099584973547

[back to top]

Global Assessment Questions (GAQ)

The GAQ consists of 2 Yes/No/No Response (No Respo) questions. GAQ Question (Q)1: Has the treatment you have been taking during this study improved your erections? GAQ Q2: Has the treatment improved your ability to engage in sexual activity? (NCT01122264)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Q1:Treatment improved erections? YesQ1:Treatment improved erections? NoQ1: Treatment improved erections? No ResponseQ2:Treatment improved ability to engage? YesQ2:Treatment improved ability to engage? NoQ2: Treatment improved ability to engage? No Respo
Sildenafil Citrate On Demand2033424204849
Tadalafil On Demand21820142091429
Tadalafil Once a Day2192315214736

[back to top]

Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) Questionnaire at 4, 8, 16, and 24 Weeks

The participant questionnaire consists of 11 questions. Each question is rated on a scale of 0 (extremely low treatment satisfaction) to 4 (extremely high treatment satisfaction). The EDITS summary score was obtained by adding each individual result for all questions, dividing by the number of questions answered (mean satisfaction score), then multiplying by 25, thus obtaining a score range from 0 (extremely low treatment satisfaction) to 100 (extremely high satisfaction). Least Squares Mean changes were adjusted for treatment group, country, visit, and visit*treatment. (NCT01122264)
Timeframe: 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
EDITS at Week 4EDITS at Week 8 (n=231, 235, 231)EDITS at Week 16 (n=168, 147, 100)EDITS at Week 24 (n=141, 118, 80)
Sildenafil Citrate On Demand71.9872.7476.6477.98
Tadalafil On Demand72.3675.2879.6481.01
Tadalafil Once a Day75.2076.6477.6678.75

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 4, 8, 16, and 24 Weeks of the Sexual Relationship Domain of the Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) Questionnaire

SEAR assesses psychosocial outcomes in men with erectile dysfunction. Sexual Relationship domain consists of 8 items (items 1-8). Items 2-8 are rated on a scale of 1 (Never) to 5 (Always), whereas item 1 is reverse scored (1=Always and 5=Never). The domain score was computed by summing its respective items, then transforming it into a 0 (least favorable) to 100 (most favorable) scale. Transformed score = 100 x [(actual raw score - lowest possible raw score)/possible raw score range]. Least Squares Mean changes adjusted for baseline score, treatment group, country, visit, and visit*treatment. (NCT01122264)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change from Baseline to Week 4Change from Baseline to Week 8 (n=230, 232, 231)Change from Baseline to Week 16 (n=167, 146, 101)Change from Baseline to Week 24 (n=140, 117, 81)
Sildenafil Citrate On Demand29.5031.1537.3237.46
Tadalafil On Demand27.6531.4237.5939.37
Tadalafil Once a Day29.2631.0732.9034.96

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 4, 8, 16, and 24 Weeks of the Self Esteem Domain of the Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) Questionnaire

SEAR assesses psychosocial outcomes in men with erectile dysfunction. The Self-Esteem domain consists of 4 items (items 9-12), each rated on a scale of 1 (Never) to 5 (Always). Item 11 is reverse scored (1=Always and 5=Never). The domain score was computed by summing its respective items, then transforming it into a 0 (least favorable) to 100 (most favorable) scale. The transformed score = 100 x [(actual raw score - lowest possible raw score)/possible raw score range]. Least Squares Mean changes were adjusted for baseline score, treatment group, country, visit, and visit*treatment. (NCT01122264)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change from Baseline to 4 WeeksChange from Baseline to 8 Weeks (n=230, 233, 233)Change from Baseline to 16 Weeks (n=167, 147, 100)Change from Baseline to 24 Weeks (n=140, 116, 81)
Sildenafil Citrate On Demand26.5928.9233.8533.52
Tadalafil On Demand25.1829.1435.2335.86
Tadalafil Once a Day24.1027.8029.4631.14

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 4, 8, 16, and 24 Weeks of the Overall Relationship Domain of the Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) Questionnaire

SEAR assesses psychosocial outcomes in men with erectile dysfunction. The Overall Relationship domain consists of 2 items (items 13-14), each rated on a scale of 1 (Never) to 5 (Always). The domain score was computed by summing its respective items, then transforming it into a 0 (least favorable) to 100 (most favorable) scale. The transformed score = 100 x [(actual raw score - lowest possible raw score)/possible raw score range]. Least Squares Mean changes were adjusted for baseline score, treatment group, country, visit, and visit*treatment. (NCT01122264)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change from Baseline to Week 4Change from Baseline to Week 8 (n=229, 232, 232)Change from Baseline to Week 16 (n=166, 147, 100)Change from Baseline to Week 24 (n=139, 116, 81)
Sildenafil Citrate On Demand22.0023.7428.5728.74
Tadalafil On Demand19.9222.7529.6330.28
Tadalafil Once a Day21.1022.9626.9629.93

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 4, 8, 16 and 24 Weeks of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP)

Participant-assessed diary. Has 5 questions (Question[Q]1:erection achievement, Q2:successful penetration, Q3:successful intercourse, Q4:satisfied with erection, and Q5:satisfied with sexual experience) for each sexual encounter made over specified period of time. SEP Q1-Q5 scores determined as percentage of 'Yes' responses to each of 5 questions out of all sexual attempts recorded during the time period. Least Squares Mean changes from baseline to endpoint for each visit from a repeated measures analysis included terms for baseline score, treatment group, country, visit, and visit*treatment. (NCT01122264)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks

,,
Intervention"percentage of yes responses" (Least Squares Mean)
Q1:Change from Baseline to 4 WeeksQ1:Change from Baseline to 8 Weeks (n=224,231,229)Q1:Change from Baseline to 16 Weeks (n=166,146,99)Q1:Change from Baseline to 24 Weeks (n=139,115,81)Q2:Change from Baseline to 4 WeeksQ2:Change from Baseline to 8 Weeks (n=224,231,229)Q2:Change from Baseline to 16 Weeks (n=166,146,99)Q2:Change from Baseline to 24 Weeks (n=139,115,81)Q3:Change from Baseline to 4 WeeksQ3:Change from Baseline to 8 Weeks (n=224,231,229)Q3:Change from Baseline to 16 Weeks (n=166,146,99)Q3:Change from Baseline to 24 Weeks (n=139,115,81)Q4:Change from Baseline to 4 WeeksQ4:Change from Baseline to 8 Weeks (n=224,231,229)Q4:Change from Baseline to 16 Weeks (n=166,146,99)Q4:Change from Baseline to 24 Weeks (n=139,115,81)Q5:Change from Baseline to 4 WeeksQ5:Change from Baseline to 8 Weeks (n=224,231,229)Q5:Change from Baseline to 16 Weeks (n=166,146,99)Q5:Change from Baseline to 24 Weeks (n=139,115,81)
Sildenafil Citrate On Demand18.4120.4120.5820.3429.6434.0836.0735.9344.4552.1156.9656.2851.4559.2866.4869.0449.6355.7362.4066.57
Tadalafil On Demand14.5016.6218.4619.9727.4831.1632.7635.8341.5247.4554.2656.3949.5960.8666.1772.6746.1253.9261.5765.45
Tadalafil Once a Day18.4919.8819.1919.6028.5631.6632.7634.7041.7644.5850.6253.8351.7855.5963.0068.0645.7150.0654.5662.17

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 4, 8, 16 and 24 Weeks of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Sexual Desire Domain

Self-reported sexual desire on IIEF over past 4 weeks; comprises 2 questions (items 11 and 12). Each question rated on a scale from 1 (almost never or low/no sexual desire) to 5 (almost always or very high sexual desire). Total scores range: 2 to 10; lower numerical scores denote lower sexual desire. Least Squares Mean changes from baseline to endpoint for each visit from repeated measures analysis and included terms for baseline score, treatment group, country, baseline*treatment (if p<0.10), visit, and visit*treatment. Correlation matrix for repeated observations assumed to be unstructured. (NCT01122264)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change from Baseline to 4 WeeksChange from Baseline to 8 Weeks (n=230, 232, 232)Change from Baseline to 16 Weeks (n=167, 146, 101)Change from Baseline to 24 Weeks (n=140, 117, 81)
Sildenafil Citrate On Demand0.690.871.071.29
Tadalafil On Demand0.770.961.151.19
Tadalafil Once a Day0.750.900.870.78

[back to top]

Time to Discontinuation of Randomized Treatment

Time to discontinuation of randomized treatment was defined as the number of days from randomization until the day the participant discontinued the randomized treatment. Discontinuation of randomized treatment was defined as switching between the 3 study treatments (tadalafil on demand, tadalafil once a day, or sildenafil citrate on demand) or discontinuing from all treatments. A change of dose within the same treatment was not considered switching of treatment. This outcome measure was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. (NCT01122264)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 334 days

Interventiondays (Median)
Tadalafil On DemandNA
Tadalafil Once a Day130
Sildenafil Citrate On Demand67

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 4, 8, 16 and 24 Weeks of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Overall Satisfaction Domain

Self-reported overall satisfaction on the IIEF over past 4 weeks and consists of 2 questions (items 13 and 14), each rated on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied). Total scores range from 2 to 10; lower numerical scores represent lower overall satisfaction. Least Squares Mean changes from baseline to endpoint for each visit were from a repeated measures analysis and included terms for baseline score, treatment group, country, baseline*treatment (if p<0.10), visit, and visit*treatment. The correlation matrix for the repeated observations was assumed to be unstructured. (NCT01122264)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change from Baseline to Week 4Change from Baseline to Week 8 (n=230, 231, 233)Change from Baseline to Week 16 (n=167, 145, 101)Change from Baseline to Week 24 (n=141, 116, 81)
Sildenafil Citrate On Demand2.722.983.483.41
Tadalafil On Demand2.462.803.343.50
Tadalafil Once a Day2.582.853.093.24

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 4, 8, 16 and 24 Weeks of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Orgasmic Function Domain

Self-reported orgasmic function on the IIEF over past 4 weeks and consists of 2 questions (items 9 and 10). Each question is rated on a scale from 0 (no sexual stimulation) to 5 (almost always/always). Total scores range from 0 to 10; lower scores represent lower orgasmic function. Least Squares Mean changes from baseline to endpoint for each visit were from a repeated measures analysis and included terms for baseline score, treatment group, country, baseline*treatment (if p<0.10), visit, and visit*treatment. The correlation matrix for the repeated observations was assumed to be unstructured. (NCT01122264)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change from Baseline to Week 4Change from Baseline to Week 8 (n=231, 232, 232)Change from Baseline to Week 16 (n=167, 146, 101)Change from Baseline to Week 24 (n=141, 116, 81)
Sildenafil Citrate On Demand1.922.262.662.62
Tadalafil On Demand1.641.772.372.55
Tadalafil Once a Day1.752.082.252.48

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 4, 8, 16, and 24 Weeks of the Confidence Domain of the Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) Questionnaire

SEAR assesses psychosocial outcomes in men with erectile dysfunction. Confidence domain measures improvement in confidence; 2 subscales (6 items: Self-Esteem [items 9-12]; Overall Relationship [items 13-14]). Each item range: 1 (Never) to 5 (Always); item 11 reverse scored. Domain score=sum of domain's respective items, then transformed into 0 (least favorable) to 100 (most favorable) scale. Transformed score=100x[(actual raw score-lowest possible raw score)/possible raw score range]. Least Squares Mean change adjusted for baseline score, treatment group, country, visit, and visit*treatment. (NCT01122264)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change from Baseline to Week 4Change from Baseline to Week 8 (n=230, 233, 232)Change from Baseline to Week 16 (n=167, 147, 100)Change from Baseline to Week 24 (n=140, 116, 81)
Sildenafil Citrate On Demand25.0327.1431.8631.66
Tadalafil On Demand23.4326.9733.1533.74
Tadalafil Once a Day23.0426.1028.3330.42

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 4, 8, 16 and 24 Weeks of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Intercourse Satisfaction Domain

Self-reported intercourse satisfaction score over past 4 weeks (1 intercourse attempt item, 2 intercourse satisfaction items). Each item range: 0 (no intercourse attempts/no satisfaction) to 5 (more attempts/high satisfaction). Total scores range: 0-15; lower scores=lower intercourse satisfaction. Least Squares Mean changes from baseline to endpoint for each visit from repeated measures analysis and included terms for baseline score, treatment group, country, baseline*treatment (if p<0.10), visit, and visit*treatment. Correlation matrix for repeated observations assumed to be unstructured. (NCT01122264)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change from Baseline to Week 4Change from Baseline to Week 8 (n=231, 232, 232)Change from Baseline to Week 16 (n=167, 146, 101)Change from Baseline to Week 24 (n=141, 116, 81)
Sildenafil Citrate On Demand3.533.954.414.70
Tadalafil On Demand3.213.694.384.48
Tadalafil Once a Day3.223.153.603.71

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 4, 8, 16 and 24 Weeks of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Erectile Function (EF) Domain

Self-reported EF score over past 4 weeks. Items 1-5 scores range from 0 (no sexual activity) to 5 (high EF). Item 15 score ranges from 1 (very low confidence to get/keep erection) to 5 (very high confidence). Total scores range from 1 to 30; lower scores denote greater erectile dysfunction severity. Least Squares Mean changes from baseline to endpoint for each visit from repeated measures analysis included terms for baseline score, treatment group, country, baseline*treatment (if p<0.10), visit, and visit*treatment. Correlation matrix for repeated observations assumed to be unstructured. (NCT01122264)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change from Baseline to Week 4Change from Baseline to Week 8 (n=231, 232, 232)Change from Baseline to Week 16 (n=167, 146, 101)Change from Baseline to Week 24 (n=141, 116, 81)
Sildenafil Citrate On Demand8.869.7010.5611.05
Tadalafil On Demand7.928.9810.6010.70
Tadalafil Once a Day8.609.089.9310.01

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 24 Week Endpoint of the Sexual Self-Confidence, Spontaneity, and Time Concerns Domains (23-items) of the Psychological and Interpersonal Relationships Scale (PAIRS)

The PAIRS is a 23-item scale that assesses broader psychological/interpersonal outcomes associated with erectile dysfunction and its treatment. Each question is rated on a Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The scale consists of 3 domains: Sexual Self-Confidence (items 1-6), Spontaneity domain (items 7-15), and Time Concerns (items 16-23). The average domain score for each domain was calculated by adding the nonmissing items for the respective domain, then dividing by the number of nonmissing items for the respective domain. Each average domain score ranged from 1 to 4. Higher scores represent the following: greater sexual self-confidence (better outcome); greater spontaneity (better outcome); higher time concerns (worse outcome). The Least Squares Mean changes were adjusted for treatment group, country, baseline IIEF-EF severity, baseline domain score, and baseline domain score*treatment (if p<0.10). (NCT01122264)
Timeframe: Baseline, 24 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Sexual Self-Confidence Domain (n=196, 203, 185)Spontaneity Domain (n=197, 202, 186)Time Concerns Domain (n=196, 200, 184)
Sildenafil Citrate On Demand0.730.020.04
Tadalafil On Demand0.930.13-0.08
Tadalafil Once a Day0.900.11-0.20

[back to top]

Number of Days From the 8-Week Study Visit to the Time the Participant Discontinues From All Phosphodiesterase Type 5 (PDE5) Inhibitor Treatments

The differences in time between the 8-week time point and the discontinuation of all study treatments (that is, discontinuation from the study and not switching to another treatment) are reported by the median (95% confidence interval). Duration was measured as the number of days from Week 8 to the date of the last dose of the study drug. This outcome measure was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. (NCT01122264)
Timeframe: 8 weeks up to 334 days

Interventiondays (Median)
Tadalafil On DemandNA
Tadalafil Once a DayNA
Sildenafil Citrate On Demand187

[back to top]

Number of Treatment Switches

The number of times participants switched erectile dysfunction medication within the 3 treatments being studied (tadalafil on demand, tadalafil once a day, or sildenafil citrate on demand). (NCT01122264)
Timeframe: Baseline through 24 weeks

Interventionnumber of treatment switches (Mean)
Tadalafil On Demand1.2
Tadalafil Once a Day1.2
Sildenafil Citrate On Demand1.3

[back to top]

Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS) - Partner Satisfaction With Medication Score at Week 12 Endpoint

The TSS - partner satisfaction with medication measured participant's partner satisfaction with treatment based on a 13-item questionnaire. The overall score was converted to a 0-100 scale with higher numbers on the scale indicating greater satisfaction. Satisfaction with medication was analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANOVA). The model included factors of study, treatment group, and pooled site within study. (NCT01130532)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
2.5 mg Titrated to 5 mg Tadalafil (Period III)52.5
5 mg Tadalafil (Period III)55.7
Placebo (Period III)27.5

[back to top]

Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS) - Patient Satisfaction With Medication Score at Week 12 Endpoint

The TSS - patient satisfaction with medication measured participant satisfaction with treatment based on a 13-item questionnaire. The overall score was converted to a 0-100 scale with higher numbers on the scale indicating greater satisfaction. Satisfaction with medication was analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANOVA). The model included factors of study, treatment group, and pooled site within study. (NCT01130532)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
2.5 mg Titrated to 5 mg Tadalafil (Period III)53.7
5 mg Tadalafil (Period III)55.9
Placebo (Period III)24.8

[back to top]

"Change From Baseline to 12-Week in Percentage of Yes Responses to Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Questions 1-5"

Assessed was the mean change from baseline in the percentage of Yes responses to the SEP diary Questions 1-5. Least Squares (LS) mean of the change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model included centered-baseline as a covariate and factors of study, treatment group, and pooled site within study, and centered-baseline-by-treatment-group interaction. (NCT01130532)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

,,
Intervention"percentage of yes responses" (Least Squares Mean)
Question 1: Able to Achieve ErectionQuestion 2: Able to InsertQuestion 3: Successful IntercourseQuestion 4: Satisfied with HardnessQuestion 5: Overall Satisfaction with Experience
2.5 mg Titrated to 5 mg Tadalafil (Period III)12.226.237.344.243.6
5 mg Tadalafil (Period III)11.426.139.442.841.2
Placebo (Period III)1.86.912.611.510.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12-Week Endpoint in the International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) Domain Score

Self-reported erectile function over the past 4 weeks. IIEF- EF is the sum of Questions 1-5 and 15 of the IIEF. Questions 1-5 are scored 0 (low/no erectile function) to 5 (high erectile function) and Question 15 is scored 1 (very low confidence) to 5 (very high confidence), for a total score ranging from 1 to 30. Higher scores represent better erectile function. Least Squares (LS) mean of the change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model included centered-baseline as a covariate and factors of study, treatment group, and pooled site within study, and centered-baseline-by-treatment-group interaction. (NCT01130532)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
2.5 mg Titrated to 5 mg Tadalafil (Period III)7.9
5 mg Tadalafil (Period III)8.1
Placebo (Period III)1.8

[back to top]

Change From 12 Weeks to 16 Weeks in Participant's International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) Domain Score

Self-reported erectile function over the past 4 weeks. IIEF- EF is the sum of Questions 1-5 and 15 of the IIEF. Questions 1-5 are scored 0 (low/no erectile function) to 5 (high erectile function) and Question 15 is scored 1 (very low confidence) to 5 (very high confidence), for a total score ranging from 1 to 30. Higher scores represent better erectile function. (NCT01130532)
Timeframe: 12 weeks and 16 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
End of Week 12End of Week 16
2.5 mg Titrated to 5 mg Tadalafil (Period IV)22.424.1
5 mg Tadalafil (Period IV)22.524.2
Placebo (Period IV)16.024.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12-Week Endpoint in Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS) - Partner

The TSS measured participant's partner satisfaction with treatment based on a 13-item questionnaire. The overall score for each of five TSS domains (confidence to complete sexual activity, ease of erection, pleasure from sexual activity, erectile function satisfaction, and satisfaction with orgasm) was converted to a 0-100 scale with higher numbers on the scale indicating greater satisfaction. Least Squares (LS) mean of the change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model included centered-baseline as a covariate and factors of study, treatment group, and pooled site within study, and centered-baseline-by-treatment-group interaction. (NCT01130532)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Confidence to complete sexual activityEase of erectionPleasure from sexual activityErectile function satisfactionSatisfaction with orgasm
2.5 mg Titrated to 5 mg Tadalafil (Period III)23.723.118.228.618.7
5 mg Tadalafil (Period III)27.225.318.528.521.0
Placebo (Period III)2.00.71.33.43.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12-Week Endpoint in Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS) - Patient

The TSS measured participant satisfaction with treatment based on a 13-item questionnaire. The overall score for each of five TSS domains (confidence to complete sexual activity, ease of erection, pleasure from sexual activity, erectile function satisfaction, and satisfaction with orgasm) was converted to a 0-100 scale with higher numbers on the scale indicating greater satisfaction. Least Squares (LS) mean of the change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model included centered-baseline as a covariate and factors of study, treatment group, and pooled site within study, and centered-baseline-by-treatment-group interaction. (NCT01130532)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Confidence to complete sexual activityEase of erectionPleasure from sexual activityErectile function satisfactionSatisfaction with orgasm
2.5 mg Titrated to 5 mg Tadalafil (Period III)27.024.022.631.025.6
5 mg Tadalafil (Period III)29.224.722.733.626.3
Placebo (Period III)3.84.13.34.96.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12-Week Endpoint in the International Index of Erectile Function - Intercourse Satisfaction (IIEF-IS) Domain Score

Self-reported intercourse satisfaction over the past 4 weeks. IIEF-IS is the sum of Questions 6, 7 and 8 of the IIEF. Scores range from 0 (low/no satisfaction) to 5 (high satisfaction) for each question, with the total possible score for the 3 questions of 0 to 15. Least Squares (LS) mean of the change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model included centered-baseline as a covariate and factors of study, treatment group, and pooled site within study, and centered-baseline-by-treatment-group interaction. (NCT01130532)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
2.5 mg Titrated to 5 mg Tadalafil (Period III)2.8
5 mg Tadalafil (Period III)2.6
Placebo (Period III)0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12-Week Endpoint in the International Index of Erectile Function - Overall Satisfaction (IIEF-OS) Domain Score

Self-reported overall satisfaction over the past 4 weeks. IIEF-OS is the sum of Questions 13 and 14; each question scored as 1 (low/no satisfaction) through 5 (high satisfaction) with total subscore for the 2 questions of 2 to 10. Least Squares (LS) mean of the change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model included centered-baseline as a covariate and factors of study, treatment group, and pooled site within study, and centered-baseline-by-treatment-group interaction. (NCT01130532)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
2.5 mg Titrated to 5 mg Tadalafil (Period III)2.4
5 mg Tadalafil (Period III)2.4
Placebo (Period III)0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12-Week Endpoint in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Question 15 (Sexual Confidence)

Self-reported erectile function over the past 4 weeks. Question 15, confidence in the ability to get an erection, is scored from 1 (very low confidence) to 5 (very high confidence). Least Squares (LS) mean of the change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model included centered-baseline as a covariate and factors of study, treatment group, and pooled site within study, and centered-baseline-by-treatment-group interaction. (NCT01130532)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
2.5 mg Titrated to 5 mg Tadalafil (Period III)1.2
5 mg Tadalafil (Period III)1.3
Placebo (Period III)0.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Having an International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) Domain Score Greater Than or Equal to 26 Through 12-Week Endpoint (Double-Blind Treatment Period)

Self-reported erectile function over the past 4 weeks. IIEF- EF is the sum of Questions 1-5 and 15 of the IIEF. Questions 1-5 are scored 0 (low/no erectile function) to 5 (high erectile function) and Question 15 is scored 1 (very low confidence) to 5 (very high confidence), for a total score ranging from 1 to 30. Higher scores represent better erectile function. Data presented are the percentage of participants who return to normal erectile function (IIEF-EF domain score ≥26) at end of double-blind treatment period (Period III). (NCT01130532)
Timeframe: Baseline through 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
2.5 mg Titrated to 5 mg Tadalafil (Period III)38.7
5 mg Tadalafil (Period III)39.6
Placebo (Period III)12.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Having International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) Domain Score Greater Than or Equal to 26 From 12 to 16 Weeks

Self-reported erectile function over the past 4 weeks. IIEF- EF is the sum of Questions 1-5 and 15 of the IIEF. Questions 1-5 are scored 0 (low/no erectile function) to 5 (high erectile function) and Question 15 is scored 1 (very low confidence) to 5 (very high confidence), for a total score ranging from 1 to 30. Higher scores represent better erectile function. Data presented are the percentage of participants who return to normal erectile function (IIEF-EF domain score ≥26) at end of open-label extension treatment period (Period IV). (NCT01130532)
Timeframe: 12 weeks through 16 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
2.5 mg Titrated to 5 mg Tadalafil (Period IV)54.5
5 mg Tadalafil (Period IV)59.8
Placebo (Period IV)62.8

[back to top]

"Change From Week 12 to Week 16 Percentage of Yes Responses to Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Questions 3"

"Assessed the percentage of Yes responses to the SEP diary Question 3 Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse? from Week 12 (end of double-Blind treatment) to Week 16 (end of open-label treatment)." (NCT01130532)
Timeframe: 12 weeks and 16 weeks

,,
Intervention"percentage of yes responses" (Mean)
End of Week 12End of Week 16
2.5 mg Titrated to 5 mg Tadalafil (Period IV)68.375.0
5 mg Tadalafil (Period IV)69.075.5
Placebo (Period IV)43.180.0

[back to top]

30-Day Person Time Analysis Risk of NAION Associated With PDE5 Inhibitor Use

Total participant days of PDE5 inhibitor exposure within 30 days prior to onset of NAION. (NCT01131104)
Timeframe: 30 days prior to NAION onset

InterventionRelative risk of exposure (Number)
Cohort 12.27

[back to top]

Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at 26 Weeks

Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) measures the participant's perception of improvement at the time of assessment compared with the start of treatment. Number of participants is reported by the categorized score ranging from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). (NCT01139762)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
1 = Very much better2 = Much better3 = Little better4 = No change5 = A little worse6 = Much worse7 = Very much worse
Placebo298211252571
Tadalafil21124102491021

[back to top]

Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at 26 Weeks

Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) measures clinician's perception of participant improvement at the time of assessment compared with the start of treatment. Number of participants is reported by the categorized score ranging from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). (NCT01139762)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
1 = Very much improved2 = Much improved3 = Minimally improved4 = No change5 = Minimally worse6 = Much worse7 = Very much worse
Placebo2297106481061
Tadalafil231299847550

[back to top]

Change in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) From Baseline to 4 and 26 Weeks

The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is a rating scale for severity of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). The IPSS has a 7-component questionnaire. Each question is scored on a scale from 0 (none/no symptoms) to 5 (frequent symptoms), for a total score range of 0 to 35. Higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least Squares (LS) Mean values were obtained from a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis. Model includes treatment, region, visit, baseline total IPSS, and visit-by-treatment interaction. (NCT01139762)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks, 26 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
4 weeks26 weeks
Placebo-2.29-4.47
Tadalafil-3.95-5.51

[back to top]

Change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Subscores Index From Baseline to 4, 12, and 26 Weeks

IPSS storage (irritative) subscore is the sum of Questions 2, 4 and 7 of the 7-component IPSS questionnaire. Scores range from 0 (no irritative symptoms) to 5 (frequent irritative symptoms), with total subscore of the 3 questions for irritative subscore range from 0 to 15. IPSS voiding (obstructive) subscore is the sum of Questions 1, 3, 5 and 6 of the IPSS questionnaire. Scores range from 0 (no obstructive symptoms) to 5 (frequent obstructive symptoms), with total subscore of the 4 questions of the obstructive score range from 0 to 20. Least Squares (LS) Mean values were obtained from a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis. Model includes treatment, region, visit, baseline total IPSS, and visit-by-treatment interaction. (NCT01139762)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
IPSS storage (irritative) subscore - 4 weeksIPSS storage (irritative) subscore - 12 weeksIPSS storage (irritative) subscore - 26 weeksIPSS voiding (obstructive) subscore - 4 weeksIPSS voiding (obstructive) subscore - 12 weeksIPSS voiding (obstructive) subscore - 26 weeks
Placebo-0.76-1.34-1.66-1.47-2.37-2.77
Tadalafil-1.27-1.74-2.00-2.65-3.41-3.50

[back to top]

Change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Quality of Life Index From Baseline to 4, 12, and 26 Weeks

"IPSS Quality of Life Index assesses participant response to the following question: If you were to spend the rest of your life with your urinary condition just the way it is now, how would you feel about that? Response options are Delighted (0); Pleased (1); Mostly satisfied (2); Mixed-about equally satisfied and dissatisfied (3); Mostly dissatisfied (4); Unhappy (5); Terrible (6), with a total range of 0-6. Least Squares (LS) Mean values were obtained from a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis. Model includes treatment, region, visit, baseline total IPSS, and visit-by-treatment interaction." (NCT01139762)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
4 weeks12 weeks26 weeks
Placebo-0.32-0.76-0.92
Tadalafil-0.63-0.95-1.10

[back to top]

Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Question 3 and 4 Scores From Baseline to 4, 12, and 26 Weeks

IIEF Question 3 asks how often a participant was able to penetrate his partner over the past 4 weeks. Scores range from 0 (did not attempt intercourse) to 5 (almost always or always). IIEF Question 4 asks whether/how often a participant was able to maintain an erection after penetration over the past 4 weeks. Scores range from 0 (did not attempt intercourse) to 5 (almost always or always). Least Squares (LS) Mean values were obtained from a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis. Model includes treatment, region, visit, baseline IIEF, and visit-by-treatment interaction. (NCT01139762)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Question 3 - 4 weeksQuestion 3 - 12 weeksQuestion 3 - 26 weeksQuestion 4 - 4 weeksQuestion 4 - 12 weeksQuestion 4 - 26 weeks
Placebo-0.320.04-0.07-0.210.130.06
Tadalafil0.420.720.680.490.740.68

[back to top]

Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) - Sexual Desire Domain Scores From Baseline to 4, 12, and 26 Weeks

Sexual desire domain scores is the sum of Questions 11 and 12 from the IIEF questionnaire. Scores range from 1 (low/no desire) to 5 (high desire) for each question, with the total possible score for the 2 questions ranging from 2 to 10. Higher total scores indicate higher desire. Least Squares (LS) Mean values were obtained from a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis. Model includes treatment, region, visit, baseline IIEF, and visit-by-treatment interaction. (NCT01139762)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
4 weeks12 weeks26 weeks
Placebo-0.47-0.23-0.05
Tadalafil0.460.560.71

[back to top]

Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) - Overall Satisfaction Domain Scores From Baseline to 4, 12, and 26 Weeks

Self-reported overall satisfaction over the past 4 weeks. IIEF-Overall Satisfaction is the sum of Questions 13 and 14 of IIEF questionnaire. Scores range from 1 (low/no satisfaction) to 5 (high satisfaction) for each question, with the total possible score for the 2 questions ranging from 2 to 10. Higher total scores indicate higher satisfaction. Least Squares (LS) Mean values were obtained from a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis. Model includes treatment, region, visit, baseline IIEF, and visit-by-treatment interaction. (NCT01139762)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
4 weeks12 weeks26 weeks
Placebo-0.100.310.40
Tadalafil0.911.381.61

[back to top]

Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) - Orgasmic Function Domain Scores From Baseline to 4, 12, and 26 Weeks

Orgasmic Function domain scores is the sum of Questions 9 and 10 from the IIEF questionnaire. Scores range from 0 (low/no orgasm) to 5 (high orgasm) for each question, with the total possible score for the 2 questions ranging from 0 to 10. Higher total scores indicate higher orgasm. Least Squares (LS) Mean values were obtained from a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis. Model includes treatment, region, visit, baseline IIEF, and visit-by-treatment interaction. (NCT01139762)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
4 weeks12 weeks26 weeks
Placebo-0.630.18-0.18
Tadalafil0.901.080.89

[back to top]

Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) - Intercourse Satisfaction Domain Scores From Baseline to 4, 12, and 26 Weeks

Self-reported intercourse satisfaction over the past 4 weeks. IIEF-intercourse satisfaction is the sum of Questions 6, 7 and 8 of the IIEF. Scores range from 0 (low/no satisfaction) to 5 (high satisfaction) for each question, with the total possible score for the 3 questions of 0 to 15. Higher total scores indicate higher satisfaction. Least Squares (LS) Mean values were obtained from a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis. Model includes treatment, region, visit, baseline IIEF, and visit-by-treatment interaction. (NCT01139762)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
4 weeks12 weeks26 weeks
Placebo-0.460.08-0.26
Tadalafil1.361.681.72

[back to top]

Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) - Erectile Function Domain Scores From Baseline to 4, 12, and 26 Weeks

Self-reported erectile function over the past 4 weeks. IIEF- EF is the sum of Questions 1-5 and 15 of the IIEF. Questions 1-5 are scored 0 (low/no erectile function) to 5 (high erectile function) and Question 15 is scored 1 (very low confidence) to 5 (very high confidence), for a total score ranging from 1 to 30. Higher scores represent better erectile function. Least Squares (LS) Mean values were obtained from a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis. Model includes treatment, region, visit, baseline IIEF, and visit-by-treatment interaction. (NCT01139762)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
4 weeks12 weeks26 weeks
Placebo-1.140.63-0.02
Tadalafil3.714.714.71

[back to top]

Treatment Satisfaction Scale - Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (TSS-BPH) at 26 Weeks

The TSS-BPH was a validated participant-rated instrument that measured participant satisfaction with treatment based on a 13-item questionnaire. It consists of 10 items on a Likert-like scale with scores ranging from 1 (higher satisfaction) to 5 (lower satisfaction), 1 item with score ranging from 0 (higher satisfaction) to 5 (lower satisfaction), and 2 yes/no questions. The mean score for each participant ranges from 0.9 (higher satisfaction) to 5.0 (lower satisfaction). Data presented are the average of mean scores for each treatment group. (NCT01139762)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tadalafil2.0
Placebo2.1

[back to top]

Change in Post Void Residual (PVR) Volume From Baseline to 26 Weeks

Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR) is determined using a portable, calibrated ultrasound device. It consists of the average of a minimum of 3 scans where the residual bladder volume was calculated by averaging the most accurate of the 3 imaging attempts. (NCT01139762)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

Interventionmilliliters (mL) (Mean)
Tadalafil-24.8
Placebo-23.1

[back to top]

Change in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) From Baseline to 12 Weeks

The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is a rating scale for severity of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). The IPSS has a 7-component questionnaire. Each question is scored on a scale from 0 (none/no symptoms) to 5 (frequent symptoms), for a total score range of 0 to 35. Higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least Squares (LS) Mean values were obtained from a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis. Model includes treatment, region, visit, baseline total IPSS, and visit-by-treatment interaction. (NCT01139762)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Tadalafil-5.18
Placebo-3.76

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 4 and 8 Weeks in Arterial Resistive Index (RI) in the Prostate Peripheral Zone and Bladder Neck

Arterial RI was a measure of vascular resistance using Doppler ultrasound. RI was the ratio of (peak systolic velocity - end diastolic velocity)/peak systolic velocity, and increased as resistance to flow increased. The least squares (LS) mean was estimated from a mixed-effects model with repeated measures (MMRM) that included fixed effects for treatment, region, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction, baseline as a covariate, a random effect of participant within treatment, and an unstructured covariance matrix. (NCT01152190)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8

,
Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 Change, Prostate Peripheral Zone (n=45, 43)Week 8 Change, Prostate Peripheral Zone (n=43, 38)Week 4 Change, Bladder Neck (n=30, 30)Week 8 Change, Bladder Neck (n=32, 26)
Placebo0.00-0.01-0.010.01
Tadalafil0.010.010.010.02

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 8-Week Endpoint in Arterial Resistive Index (RI) in the Prostate Transition Zone

Arterial RI was a measure of vascular resistance using Doppler ultrasound. RI was the ratio of (peak systolic velocity - end diastolic velocity)/peak systolic velocity, and increased as resistance to blood flow increased. The least squares (LS) mean was estimated from a mixed-effects model with repeated measures (MMRM) that included fixed effects for treatment, region, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction, baseline as a covariate, a random effect of participant within treatment, and an unstructured covariance matrix. (NCT01152190)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.01
Tadalafil0.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 4-Week Endpoint in Arterial Resistive Index (RI) in the Prostate Transition Zone

Arterial RI was a measure of vascular resistance using Doppler ultrasound. RI was the ratio of (peak systolic velocity - end diastolic velocity)/peak systolic velocity, and increased as resistance to flow increased. The least squares (LS) mean was estimated from a mixed-effects model with repeated measures (MMRM) that included fixed effects for treatment, region, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction, baseline as a covariate, a random effect of participant within treatment, and an unstructured covariance matrix. (NCT01152190)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.00
Tadalafil0.01

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 4 and 8 Weeks in Color Pixel Intensity (CPI) in the Prostate Transition Zone, Peripheral Zone, and Bladder Neck

CPI quantified blood flow in a pre-specified region of interest by using color Doppler imaging. CPI was the mean color pixel intensity in the region of interest and scores could range from 0 to 160. An increase in CPI reflected an increase in blood flow. The least squares (LS) mean was estimated from a mixed-effects model with repeated measures (MMRM) that included fixed effects for treatment, region, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction, baseline as a covariate, a random effect of participant within treatment, and an unstructured covariance matrix. (NCT01152190)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 Change, Prostate Transition Zone (n=44, 43)Week 8 Change, Prostate Transition Zone (n=43, 38)Week 4 Change, Prostate Peripheral Zone (n=44, 43)Week 8 Change, Prostate Peripheral Zone (n=43, 38)Week 4 Change, Bladder Neck (n=42, 40)Week 8 Change, Bladder Neck (n=38, 36)
Placebo-2.212.02-1.483.117.37-0.13
Tadalafil0.422.531.992.553.177.81

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Total Cholesterol and Triglycerides

The least squares (LS) mean was estimated from a repeated measures analysis of covariance model that included terms for treatment, visit, treatment*visit, baseline, baseline*treatment (if p-value<0.25). (NCT01160289)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,
Interventionmillimoles per Liter (mmol/L) (Least Squares Mean)
Total CholesterolTriglycerides
1 mg LY2452473 and 5 mg Tadalafil-0.210-0.155
10 mg Tadalafil-0.086-0.139
5 mg LY2452473-0.282-0.067
5 mg LY2452473 and 5 mg Tadalafil-0.275-0.171
5 mg Tadalafil-0.0590.056

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)

The least squares (LS) was estimated from a repeated measures analysis of covariance model that included terms for treatment, visit, treatment*visit, baseline, baseline*treatment (if p-value<0.25). (NCT01160289)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
HDL-CLDL-C
1 mg LY2452473 and 5 mg Tadalafil-7.440-1.695
10 mg Tadalafil1.776-0.066
5 mg LY2452473-22.230-3.424
5 mg LY2452473 and 5 mg Tadalafil-16.9740.062
5 mg Tadalafil1.573-0.718

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in IIEF EF Domain Score Reported by Testosterone Concentration Subgroups

The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) EF was the sum of Questions (Q) 1 to Q5 and Q15 of the IIEF Self-reported questionnaire. Q1 to Q5 were rated 0 (low/no erectile function) to 5 (high erectile function) and Q15 was rated 1 (no/low confidence) to 5 (high confidence). IIEF EF domain scores ranged from 1 to 30. Higher scores denoted better EF. Testosterone concentration subgroups were based on optimal baseline testosterone levels (<340 nanograms per deciliter [ng/dL] or ≥340 ng/dL). The least squares (LS) mean was estimated from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model that included terms for treatment group, baseline, and baseline*treatment interaction (if p-value<0.25). (NCT01160289)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Testosterone <340 ng/dLTestosterone ≥340 ng/dL
1 mg LY2452473 and 5 mg Tadalafil2.5231.077
10 mg Tadalafil4.1722.217
5 mg LY2452473-1.055-0.714
5 mg LY2452473 and 5 mg Tadalafil1.0123.416
5 mg Tadalafil1.9351.703

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in IIEF Domain Scores (Intercourse Satisfaction, Orgasmic Function, Sexual Desire, and Overall Satisfaction)

Intercourse Satisfaction (IS) domain score: sum of Questions (Q) 6, Q7, and Q8, each rated 0 (low/no satisfaction) to 5 (high satisfaction). IS domain score range: 0 to 15; lower scores denoted lower satisfaction. Orgasmic Function (OF) domain score: sum of Q9 and Q10, each rated 0 (no sexual stimulation) to 5 (almost always/always). OF domain score range: 0 to 10; lower scores denoted lower OF. Sexual Desire (SD) domain score: sum of Q11 and Q12, each rated 1 (almost never or low/no sexual desire) to 5 (almost always or very high sexual desire). SD domain score range: 2 to 10; lower scores denoted lower SD. Overall Satisfaction (OS) domain score: sum of Q13 and Q14, each rated 1 (low/no satisfaction) to 5 (high satisfaction). OS domain score range: 2 to 10; lower scores denoted lower OS. Least squares (LS) mean estimated from repeated measures analysis of variance model that included terms for treatment, visit, treatment*visit, baseline, baseline*treatment (if p-value<0.25). (NCT01160289)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Intercourse SatisfactionOrgasmic FunctionSexual DesireOverall Satisfaction
1 mg LY2452473 and 5 mg Tadalafil0.4750.5100.0920.477
10 mg Tadalafil1.1270.6780.3921.206
5 mg LY2452473-0.6720.160-0.201-0.378
5 mg LY2452473 and 5 mg Tadalafil0.5140.1170.0010.258
5 mg Tadalafil0.5540.7330.1800.826

[back to top]

"Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in the Percentage of Yes Responses on the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary"

"The SEP diary was a participant-assessed diary with 5 questions (Q): Q1 (erection achievement), Q2 (successful penetration), Q3 (successful intercourse), Q4 (satisfied with erection), and Q5 (satisfied with sexual experience) for each sexual encounter made over a specified period of time. SEP Q1 to Q5 scores were determined as a percentage of Yes responses to each of the 5 questions out of all sexual attempts recorded during the time period. A higher percentage of Yes responses indicated better EF. Assessed was the mean change from baseline in the percentage of Yes responses to the SEP diary Q1 to Q5. The least squares (LS) mean was estimated from a repeated measures analysis of covariance model that included terms for treatment, visit, treatment*visit, baseline, baseline*treatment (if p-value <0.25)." (NCT01160289)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,
Intervention"percentage of yes responses" (Least Squares Mean)
Question 1Question 2Question 3Question 4Question 5
1 mg LY2452473 and 5 mg Tadalafil-0.2473.1759.29612.93513.602
10 mg Tadalafil4.42710.26714.64524.20222.410
5 mg LY2452473-10.711-7.849-3.800-1.570-1.956
5 mg LY2452473 and 5 mg Tadalafil-2.9763.68911.75213.91015.196
5 mg Tadalafil-1.4251.8442.5938.8579.400

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)

The least squares (LS) mean was estimated from a repeated measures analysis of covariance model that included terms for treatment, visit, treatment*visit, baseline, baseline*treatment (if p-value<0.25). (NCT01160289)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionnanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) (Least Squares Mean)
1 mg LY2452473 and 5 mg Tadalafil0.162
5 mg LY2452473 and 5 mg Tadalafil-0.088
5 mg LY24524730.265
10 mg Tadalafil0.246
5 mg Tadalafil0.032

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Fasting Insulin

Change from baseline to 12 Week endpoint in fasting blood insulin concentration. The least squares (LS) mean was estimated from a repeated measures analysis of covariance model that included terms for treatment, visit, treatment*visit, baseline, baseline*treatment (if p-value<0.25). (NCT01160289)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionmilliunits per Liter (mU/L) (Least Squares Mean)
1 mg LY2452473 and 5 mg Tadalafil3.756
5 mg LY2452473 and 5 mg Tadalafil-4.501
5 mg LY2452473-0.717
10 mg Tadalafil-3.300
5 mg Tadalafil-1.276

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Erectile Function (EF) Domain Score

The IIEF EF domain score was the sum of Questions (Q) 1 to Q5 and Q15 of the IIEF self-reported questionnaire. Q1 to Q5 were rated 0 (low/no EF) to 5 (high EF) and Q15 was rated 1 (no/low confidence) to 5 (high confidence). IIEF EF domain scores ranged from 1 to 30. Higher scores denoted better EF. (NCT01160289)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
1 mg LY2452473 and 5 mg Tadalafil2.515
5 mg LY2452473 and 5 mg Tadalafil2.405
5 mg LY2452473-0.971
10 mg Tadalafil3.530
5 mg Tadalafil2.054

[back to top]
25)"-NCT01160289">

"Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in the Percentage of Participants Who Return to Normal on the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Scale (EF>25)"

The percentage of participants whose IIEF Erectile Function (EF) domain scores changed from ≤25 at baseline to >25 (normal) at Week 12. The IIEF EF domain score was the sum of IIEF Question (Q) 1 to Q5 and Q15. Q1 to Q5 were rated 0 (low/no EF) to 5 (high EF) and Q15 was rated 1 (no/low confidence) to 5 (high confidence). IIEF EF domain scores ranged from 1 to 30. Higher scores denoted better EF. (NCT01160289)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
1 mg LY2452473 and 5 mg Tadalafil24.7
5 mg LY2452473 and 5 mg Tadalafil27.8
5 mg LY245247313.5
10 mg Tadalafil30.3
5 mg Tadalafil27.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint in Fasting Glucose

The least squares (LS) mean was estimated from a repeated measures analysis of covariance model that included terms for treatment, visit, treatment*visit, baseline, baseline*treatment (if p-value<0.25). (NCT01160289)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionmillimoles per Liter (mmol/L) (Least Squares Mean)
1 mg LY2452473 and 5 mg Tadalafil0.153
5 mg LY2452473 and 5 mg Tadalafil-0.306
5 mg LY24524730.070
10 mg Tadalafil-0.234
5 mg Tadalafil0.158

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Borg Dyspnea Index at Week 24

Borg Dyspnea Index (BDI) indicates the degree of breathlessness after completion of the 6 minute walk test. The BDI was calculated by using the Borg category (C) ratio (R) CR10 scale which starts at 0 (nothing at all) and has no upper limit (extremely strong). Change from BL was calculated as the Week 24 values minus the BL value. The BDI scale was assessed by each participant. The BL BDI score is the average of the two BDI values obtained following the two 6MWD tests used in determining the BL 6MWD. A negative change from BL in the BDI score represented an improvement for the participant. The analysis was performed based on the last observation carried forward data, except in the case of an adjudicated clinical failure event of death or hospitalization preceding the missing data observation. In this case, the missing observation was assigned the worst-rank score relative to those actually observed and was assigned rank reflecting the relative order of the actual event times. (NCT01178073)
Timeframe: Baseline (BL) and Week 24

InterventionScores on a scale (Median)
Combination Therapy: Ambrisentan + Tadalafil-1.00
Monotherapy Pooled: Ambrisentan or Tadalafil-0.50
Ambrisentan Monotherapy-0.50
Tadalafil Monotherapy-0.50

[back to top]

Number of Participants With First Adjudicated Clinical Failure (CF) Event, Death, Hospitalisation for Worsening PAH, Disease Progression, Unsatisfactory Long-term Clinical Response, All Through FAV

Time to the first adjudicated CF event (death, hospitalization for worsening pulmonary arterial hypertension [PAH], disease progression, or unsatisfactory long-term clinical response) after initiating either first-line combination therapy with AMB and TAD or first-line monotherapy with either drug (AMB or TAD) in par. with PAH was assessed. If data was not available for some par. following a loss to follow-up, their event times were treated as censored at their last assessment time for the statistical analyses. FAV occurred approximately 4 weeks after the predicted 105th adjudicated first CF event was reached. Par. who had an FAV, and who had no adjudicated events or whose first adjudicated event occurred after their FAV, were censored at their individual FAV. Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population: all randomized par. who met the PAH diagnosis and inclusion/exclusion criteria defined in protocol amendment 2 and who also received at least one dose of investigational product (IP). (NCT01178073)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to the Final Assessment Visit (FAV) (average of 609 days)

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
First adjudicated clinical failure eventDeath (all-cause)Hospitalization for worsening PAHDisease progressionUnsatisfactory long-term clinical response
Ambrisentan Monotherapy432181211
Combination Therapy: Ambrisentan + Tadalafil469101017
Monotherapy Pooled: Ambrisentan or Tadalafil778301623
Tadalafil Monotherapy34612412

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Satisfactory Clinical Response at Week 24

A satisfactory clinical response at Week 24 is defined as a participant who meets all of the following criteria: 10% improvement in 6MWD compared with Baseline; improvement to or maintenance of World Health Organization (WHO) class I or II symptoms; no events of clinical worsening prior to or at the Week 24 visit. Clinical worsening events included: death, hospitalization for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), and disease progression. Participants without an event of clinical worsening prior to or at the Week 24 visit who did not have a 6MWD value or a WHO functional class value at Week 24 were excluded from the analysis. (NCT01178073)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Combination Therapy: Ambrisentan + Tadalafil39
Monotherapy Pooled: Ambrisentan or Tadalafil29
Ambrisentan Monotherapy31
Tadalafil Monotherapy27

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the 6 Minute Walk Distance Test at Week 24

The 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) test measures the distance that a participant can walk in a period of 6 minutes. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed based on last observation carried forward data, except in the case of an adjudicated clinical failure event of death or hospitalization preceding the missing data observation. In this case, the missing observation was assigned the worst-rank score relative to those actually observed and was assigned a rank reflecting the relative order of the actual event times. Baseline 6MWD comprised of an average of the last two consecutive measurements prior to randomization that varied by no greater than 10%. If only one measurement was available, that measurement was used. If no two consecutive measures vary by no greater than 10% then Baseline was based on the last two consecutive measures for a participant. (NCT01178073)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

InterventionMeters (Median)
Combination Therapy: Ambrisentan + Tadalafil48.98
Monotherapy Pooled: Ambrisentan or Tadalafil23.80
Ambrisentan Monotherapy27.00
Tadalafil Monotherapy22.70

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the World Health Organization Functional Class at Week 24

The WHO Functional Class (FC) indicates the severity of PAH and is an adaptation of the New York Heart Association classification. It was assessed by the investigator. There are four grades for WHO FC based on severity of symptoms (Class I = none, Class IV = most severe). Baseline WHO FC is the latest assessment prior to dosing (i.e., at Randomization or Screening). Change from Baseline at Week 24 was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed based on the last observation carried forward data, except in the case of an adjudicated clinical failure event of death or hospitalization preceding the missing data observation. In this case, the missing observations was assigned the worst-rank score relative to those actually observed and was assigned rank reflecting the relative order of the actual event times. (NCT01178073)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

InterventionScores on a scale (Median)
Combination Therapy: Ambrisentan + Tadalafil0.0
Monotherapy Pooled: Ambrisentan or Tadalafil0.0
Ambrisentan Monotherapy0.0
Tadalafil Monotherapy0.0

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in the N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide at Week 24

N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) is a surrogate marker of heart failure. The data were log-transformed. The geometric mean was calculated (based on the log-transformed data). The geometric mean ratio was calculated as the ratio between the Week 24 value and the Baseline value (based on the log-transformed data) and presented as percent change = 100 * (geometric mean ratio - 1). The Baseline value is the last value prior to administration of study drug; this may be prior to or on the day of study drug initiation. No imputation was performed for missing data. The secondary endpoints were analyzed according to a pre-specified hierarchical testing procedure. (NCT01178073)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Combination Therapy: Ambrisentan + Tadalafil-67.15
Monotherapy Pooled: Ambrisentan or Tadalafil-50.37
Ambrisentan Monotherapy-56.15
Tadalafil Monotherapy-43.83

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Curve (AUC) for Tadalafil and Metabolite IC710

AUC for Day 1 is reported as AUC(tau [t], day 1), which is AUC from time zero to 24 hours (t) postdose on Day 1. AUC for Day 10 is reported as AUC(t,steady state [ss]), which is AUC during one 24-hour dosing interval at steady-state. (NCT01183650)
Timeframe: 1 day and 10 days

,
Interventionnanograms*hour/milliliter (ng*hr/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Day 1 TadalafilDay 10 TadalafilDay 1 Metabolite IC710Day 10 Metabolite IC710
Caucasian Participants134034103992290
Japanese Participants141027105252270

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Concentration Maximum (Cmax) of Tadalafil and Metabolite IC710

(NCT01183650)
Timeframe: 1 day and 10 days

,
Interventionnanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Day 1 TadalafilDay 10 TadalafilDay 1 Metabolite IC710Day 10 Metabolite IC710
Caucasian Participants10421524.0102
Japanese Participants10217332.1105

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Time to Concentration Maximum (Tmax) of Tadalafil and Metabolite IC710

(NCT01183650)
Timeframe: 1 day and 10 days

,
Interventionhours (Median)
Day 1 TadalafilDay 10 TadalafilDay 1 Metabolite IC710Day 10 Metabolite IC710
Caucasian Participants2.002.5324.008.00
Japanese Participants4.003.0023.834.00

[back to top] [back to top]

6 Minute Walk Distance

How far the subject walked in 6 minutes. (NCT01272388)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks

Interventionfeet (Number)
Baseline4 weeks
Tadalafil1080860

[back to top]

Quality of Life as Assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)

KCCQ overall summary score is reported. Scale is 0-100 (higher value is better). (NCT01272388)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Number)
Baseline4 weeks
Tadalafil8781.25

[back to top]

Diastolic Function as Measured by Tissue Doppler e'

Measurement of e' (average of septal and lateral) on echo at each of the time points specified. (NCT01275339)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months

,,
Interventioncm/sec (Mean)
Baseline12 weeks6 months
Placebo in Non-Diabetic Cohort5.284.885.33
Tadalafil in Diabetic Cohort4.593.754.63
Tadalafil in Non-Diabetic Cohort5.976.446.16

[back to top]

Change in NYHA/WHO Class

"At 48 week,WHO/NYHA functional class was assessed for change in WHO/NYHA functional class.Change NYHA is measured as decrease or increase in NYHA class in the subjects compared with baseline.~NYHA /WHO functional class is described below:~NYHA functional class I:no symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity NYHA functional class II:Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity NYHA functional class III:Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity NYHA functional class IV:Severe limitations. Experiences symptoms even while at rest A higher functional class represent worse symptoms." (NCT01305252)
Timeframe: Baseline and 48 week

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tadalafil Alone6
Tadalafil and Treprostinil Inhalations11

[back to top]

Change in Right Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Effect of dual-upfront therapies versus mono-therapy on percent change of right ventricular function assesed by cardiac MRI (cMRI) at 24 weeks compared with the baseline. (NCT01305252)
Timeframe: Basline and 24 weeks

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Tadalafil and Treprostinil Inhalations7.45
Tadalafil Alone2.8

[back to top]

N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP)

Change from baseline in N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) (NCT01305252)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 weeks

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Tadalafil and Treprostinil Inhalations1239
Tadalafil Alone988.4

[back to top]

B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP)

B-type Natriuretic peptide measures the percent change from baseline. (NCT01305252)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 weeks

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Tadalafil Alone374
Tadalafil and Treprostinil Inhalations295.6

[back to top]

6 Minute Walk Distance

Change in 6MWD during 24 week period compared between Tada and Tada+iTre. (NCT01305252)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 weeks

Interventionmeters (Mean)
Tadalafil Alone82.63
Tadalafil and Treprostinil Inhalations87.69

[back to top]

Short Form-36 Global Score

SF- 36 investigates the standard of quality of life through a general health assessment and not specific to a particular disease, age or treatment group. It is a 36-item questionnaire measuring 8 domains (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional, and mental health). Each domain score ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), with higher scores reflecting better health-related functional status. The global score is determined by taking an average of the individual domain scores. The global score range is from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). (NCT01324999)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 8Week 16Week 24
Tadalafil38.537.739.238.9

[back to top]

Resting Oxygen Saturation

Percent oxygen saturation of hemoglobin as measured by pulse oximetry in the resting state. (NCT01324999)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercent (Mean)
BaselineWeek 24
Tadalafil96.595.2

[back to top]

Oxygen Desaturation During 6 Minute Walk Test

Change (decrease) in oxygen saturation from start of 6 minute walk to nadir during the 6 minute walk test (NCT01324999)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionoxygen saturation percentage points (Mean)
BaselineWeek 24
Tadalafil99

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Change in WHO Functional Class (WHO FC)

The WHO functional classification ranges from I (patient's disease does not affect daily activities) to IV (patient's disease causes severe impairment). Higher scores indicate more severe impairment. (NCT01324999)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Number of participants that improved to WHO FC INumber of participants that improved to WHO FC IINumber of participants that improved to WHO FC III
Tadalafil100

[back to top]

Maximum Borg Dyspnea Score During 6 Minute Walk Test

The modified Borg scale consists of a vertical scale labelled 0 to10 with corresponding verbal expressions of progressively increasing sensation (shortness of breath) intensity. 0 represents no dyspnea, and 10 is the highest level of perceived dyspnea. (NCT01324999)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 8Week 16Week 24
Tadalafil4.85.05.36.3

[back to top]

Brain Natriuretic Peptide Level

(NCT01324999)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
BaselineWeek 8Week 16Week 24
Tadalafil58.832.337.542.6

[back to top]

St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Score

The SGRQ ranges from 0 (no impairment of quality of life) to 100 (highest impairment of quality of life) (NCT01324999)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 8Week 16Week 24
Tadalafil64.565.164.371.1

[back to top]

6 Minute Walk Distance

(NCT01324999)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24

Interventionmeters (Mean)
BaselineWeek 8Week 16Week 24
Tadalafil419.1418.1436.5377.1

[back to top]

Change in PAIRS Spontaneity Domain

PAIRS was a self-administered, 29-item scale that assessed the broader psychological and interpersonal outcomes associated with ED and its treatment. Each question was rated on a Likert scale that ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The spontaneity domain score was the average score for Items 3, 12, 13, 16, 17, 19, 21, 22, and 28. Spontaneity domain scores ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). Change was defined as endpoint minus baseline domain score. Change in PAIRS spontaneity domain at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in PAIRS spontaneity domain score. Higher scores were indicative of greater spontaneity. (NCT01352507)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tadalafil0.33
Sildenafil0.20

[back to top]

Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Erectile Function Domain

Self-reported erectile function over the past 4 weeks. IIEF erectile function was the sum of Q1 through Q5 and Q15 of the IIEF. Q1 through Q5 were scored 0 (low/no erectile function) to 5 (high erectile function) and Q15 was scored 1 (no/low confidence) to 5 (high confidence). IIEF erectile function domain scores ranged from 1 to 30. Change was defined as endpoint minus baseline domain score. Change in IIEF erectile function domain at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in IIEF EF domain score. Higher scores were indicative of better erectile function. (NCT01352507)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tadalafil12.03
Sildenafil11.86

[back to top]

Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Intercourse Satisfaction Domain

Self-reported intercourse satisfaction over the past 4 weeks. IIEF intercourse satisfaction was the sum of Q6, Q7, and Q8 of the IIEF. Scores ranged from 0 (low/no satisfaction) to 5 (high satisfaction) for each question, with the total possible score for the 3 questions ranging from 0 to 15. Change was defined as endpoint minus baseline domain score. Change in IIEF intercourse satisfaction domain at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in IIEF intercourse satisfaction domain score. Higher scores were indicative of an increase in intercourse satisfaction. (NCT01352507)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tadalafil5.88
Sildenafil5.91

[back to top]

Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Orgasmic Function Domain

Self-reported orgasmic function over the past 4 weeks. IIEF orgasmic function was the sum of Q9 and Q10 of the IIEF. Scores ranged from 0 (no stimulation) to 5 (almost always) for each question, with the total possible score for the 2 questions ranging from 0 to 10. Change was defined as endpoint minus baseline domain score. Change in IIEF orgasmic function domain at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in IIEF orgasmic function domain score. Higher scores were indicative of better orgasmic function. (NCT01352507)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tadalafil3.70
Sildenafil3.71

[back to top]

Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Overall Satisfaction Domain

Self-reported overall satisfaction over the past 4 weeks. IIEF overall satisfaction was the sum of Q13 and Q14. Scores ranged from 1 (low/no satisfaction) to 5 (high satisfaction) for each question, with the total possible score for the 2 questions ranging from 2 to 10. Change was defined as endpoint minus baseline domain score. Change in IIEF overall satisfaction domain at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in IIEF overall satisfaction domain score. Higher IIEF overall satisfaction domain scores were indicative of greater overall satisfaction. (NCT01352507)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tadalafil3.74
Sildenafil3.71

[back to top]

Change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Sexual Desire Domain

Self-reported sexual desire over the past 4 weeks. IIEF sexual desire was the sum of Q11 and Q12. Scores ranged from 1 (low/almost never) to 5 (very high/almost always) for each question, with the total possible score for the 2 questions ranging from 2 to 10. Change was defined as endpoint minus baseline domain score. Change in IIEF sexual desire domain at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in IIEF sexual desire domain score. Higher scores were indicative of increased sexual desire. (NCT01352507)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tadalafil2.55
Sildenafil2.60

[back to top]

"Percentage of Participants Preferring Tadalafil Over Sildenafil Measured at Week 18 Using Question 1 of the Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitor Treatment Preference Questionnaire (PITPQ)"

PITPQ Question (Q) 1 was a dichotomous outcome measure in which the participant selected his preferred study treatment (tadalafil or sildenafil) to receive during the Extension Phase. (NCT01352507)
Timeframe: Week 18

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
All Randomized Participants69.1

[back to top]

Change in PAIRS Time Concerns Domain

PAIRS was a self-administered, 29-item scale that assessed the broader psychological and interpersonal outcomes associated with ED and its treatment. Each question was rated on a Likert scale that ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The time concerns domain score was the average score for Items 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 20, 24, and 25. Time concern domain scores ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). Change was defined as endpoint minus baseline domain score. Change in PAIRS time concerns at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in PAIRS time concerns domain score. Higher scores were indicative of more time concerns. (NCT01352507)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tadalafil-0.28
Sildenafil-0.14

[back to top]

Change in Psychosocial and Interpersonal Relationship Scale (PAIRS) Sexual Self-Confidence Domain

PAIRS was a self-administered, 29-item scale that assessed the broader psychological and interpersonal outcomes associated with ED and its treatment. Each question was rated on a Likert scale that ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The sexual self-confidence domain score was the average score for Items 5, 10, 15, 23, 27, and 29. Sexual self-confidence domain scores ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). Change was defined as endpoint minus baseline domain score. Change in PAIRS sexual self-confidence domain scores at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in PAIRS sexual self-confidence domain score. Higher scores were indicative of greater sexual self-confidence. (NCT01352507)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tadalafil0.75
Sildenafil0.72

[back to top]

Change in Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 2

"Participant-assessed diary that assessed the mean change from baseline in the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q2, Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina?. The SEP Q2 score was determined as the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q2 out of all sexual attempts recorded during the time period. Change was defined as the percentage of yes responses at endpoint minus the percentage of yes responses at baseline. Change in percentage of yes responses to SEP Q2 at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in SEP Q2." (NCT01352507)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18

Intervention"percentage of yes responses" (Mean)
Tadalafil45.28
Sildenafil44.94

[back to top]

Change in Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 3

"Participant-assessed diary that assessed the mean change from baseline in the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q3, Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?. The SEP Q3 score was determined as the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q3 out of all sexual attempts recorded during the time period. Change was defined as the percentage of yes responses at endpoint minus percentage of yes responses at baseline. Change in the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q3 at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in SEP Q3." (NCT01352507)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18

Intervention"percentage of yes responses" (Mean)
Tadalafil64.53
Sildenafil63.72

[back to top]

Drug Attributes Questionnaire (DRAQ) at Week 18

DRAQ was a questionnaire used to record explanations for why participants preferred a drug. Participants identified their first and second reasons for drug preference from a choice of 7 reasons. Each reason for drug preference includes participants who selected that reason as their first or second reason. (NCT01352507)
Timeframe: Week 18

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Time between drug and first erection was shortWas able to get an erection long after having drugHad erections the next morningThe firmness of erectionsWas able to get an erection every timeHad few side effectsPartner preferred this treatment
Sildenafil35.211.111.151.956.525.97.4
Tadalafil10.355.024.036.437.623.610.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Moderately or Strongly Preferring the Selected Treatment at Week 18 Using Question 2 of the PITPQ

"PITPQ Q2 was a measure of the degree of treatment preference based on the participant's opinion. The question was, For the treatment preference you selected in Q1, what is your degree of preference?. Choices were moderate or strong." (NCT01352507)
Timeframe: Week 18

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Strong preferenceModerate preference
Sildenafil34.365.7
Tadalafil38.062.0

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Median length of response in months. (NCT01374217)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Tadalafil2.3

[back to top]

Response Rate

Percentage of participants who responded to the addition of tadalafil. Response is defined as a complete remission (CR), very good partial remission (VGPR), partial remission (PR), or stable disease (SD) by International Uniform Response criteria. (NCT01374217)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Tadalafil5

[back to top]

Time to Progression

Median time to progression of disease in days. (NCT01374217)
Timeframe: Up to 71 days

Interventiondays (Median)
Tadalafil48

[back to top]

Quality of Life Scores

Median change in symptom scores. Scale is the EORTC QLQ-C30. There are three domains: symptom scale (score range 7-14); past week (score range 21-82); and global health status (score range 2-14). Higher or increasing scores mean worse outcomes; lower or decreasing scores mean better outcomes. (NCT01374217)
Timeframe: 3 months (M3) and 6 months (M6)

Interventionchange in score on a scale (Median)
Symptoms (M3)Past week (M3)Global health status (M3)Symptoms (M6)Past week (M6)Global health status (M6)
Tadalafil05-1.516-1

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity [AUC(0-∞)] of LY2452473

(NCT01401543)
Timeframe: Predose up to 96 hours postdose for each of the 4 treatment periods

Interventionnanograms*hours per milliliter (ng*h/mL) (Mean)
5 mg LY2452473 and 5 mg Tadalafil514
LY900010 (Particle Size #1)495
LY900010 (Particle Size #2)453
LY900010 (Particle Size #3)463

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: AUC(0-∞) of Tadalafil

(NCT01401543)
Timeframe: Predose up to 96 hours postdose for each of the 4 treatment periods

Interventionnanograms*hours per milliliter (ng*h/mL) (Mean)
5 mg LY2452473 and 5 mg Tadalafil2410
LY900010 (Particle Size #1)2400
LY900010 (Particle Size #2)2240
LY900010 (Particle Size #3)2290

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Cmax of Tadalafil

(NCT01401543)
Timeframe: Predose up to 96 hours postdose for each of the 4 treatment periods

Interventionnanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean)
5 mg LY2452473 and 5 mg Tadalafil102
LY900010 (Particle Size #1)74.4
LY900010 (Particle Size #2)72.4
LY900010 (Particle Size #3)70.0

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of LY2452473

(NCT01401543)
Timeframe: Predose up to 96 hours postdose for each of the 4 treatment periods

Interventionnanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean)
5 mg LY2452473 and 5 mg Tadalafil32.5
LY900010 (Particle Size #1)27.1
LY900010 (Particle Size #2)25.6
LY900010 (Particle Size #3)24.7

[back to top]

Change in Insulin Resistance From Baseline to 3 Months, as Measured by HOMA-IR

The primary endpoint is defined as the treatment group difference in the change in insulin resistance (baseline HOMA-IR minus 3-month HOMA-IR). HOMA-IR = [fasting glucose * fasting insulin]/405 (NCT01444651)
Timeframe: Baseline and 3 months

,
Interventionmg*microunits/dL*mL (Mean)
Baseline3 months
Placebo3.845.06
Tadalafil3.573.81

[back to top]

Baseline to 3 Month Change in Composite of Insulin Resistance and Sensitivity, as Measured by the Oral Disposition Index

The secondary endpoint is defined as the treatment group difference in the change in oral disposition index (baseline minus 3-month). This is thought to reflect a composite of both insulin resistance and secretion. Oral disposition index = insulinogenic index / fasting insulin (NCT01444651)
Timeframe: Baseline and 3 months

,
Interventionunitless index (Mean)
Baseline3-month
Placebo2.870.58
Tadalafil1.744.48

[back to top]

Baseline to 3-month Change in Endothelial Function Measured by EndoPAT

Endothelial function was measured using the reactive hyperemia index, acquired using EndoPAT device. Peripheral arterial tonometry probes were placed on both index fingers. After a 5 min equilibration period, a blood pressure cuff was inflated to 200 mmHg and kept inflated for 5 min. The cuff was then rapidly deflated and the reactive hyperemic response pulse volume recorded, where RHI = ratio of hyperemic finger pulse volume (post-cuff inflation / pre-cuff inflation) to control finger pulse volume (post-cuff inflation / pre-cuff inflation) (NCT01444651)
Timeframe: Baseline and 3 months

,
Interventionunitless index (Mean)
Baseline3-month
Placebo2.32.2
Tadalafil2.12.1

[back to top]

Baseline to 3-month Change in Insulin Sensitivity, as Measured by the Matsuda Index

The secondary endpoint is defined as the treatment group difference in the change in Matsuda Index (baseline minus 3-month). This index is a measure of insulin resistance derived from a frequently sampled oral glucose tolerance test, obtaining glucose and insulin levels in the fasting state, as well as 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after administration of oral glucose load. Matsuda index = 10,000/SQRT [fasting glucose*fasting insulin* (mean glucose from time 30, 60, 90, 120 min) * (mean insulin at time 30, 60, 90, and 120 min)] (NCT01444651)
Timeframe: Baseline and 3 months

,
Interventionunitless index (Mean)
Baseline3 months
Placebo3.513.28
Tadalafil3.604.27

[back to top]

Baseline to 3-month Change in Matsuda Disposition Index

Change in disposition index from baseline to 3 months. This index is a composite measure thought to reflect insulin resistance and secretion. Matsuda disposition index = [Matsuda sensitivity index * insulinogenic index] (NCT01444651)
Timeframe: Baseline and 3 months

,
Interventionunitless index (Mean)
Baseline3-month
Placebo6.670.19
Tadalafil2.239.22

[back to top]

Insulinogenic Index

The secondary endpoint is defined as the treatment group difference in the change in insulinogenic index (baseline minus 3-month). This index is thought to reflect insulin secretion, and is derived from fasting and 30 min-post oral glucose tolerance testing glucose and insulin values. Insulinogenic index = [fasting insulin - insulin at time 30 min] / [fasting glucose - glucose at time 30 min] (NCT01444651)
Timeframe: Baseline and 3 months

,
Interventionunitless index (Mean)
Baseline3-month
Placebo2.171.04
Tadalafil0.392.62

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Score of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 12 Weeks

The IPSS Total Score was the sum of Questions 1 through 7 in the IPSS questionnaire. Each question was based on the participant's urination experiences and prostate symptoms during the last month. Scores ranged from 0 (none/no symptoms) to 5 (frequent symptoms) for an IPSS Total Score that ranged from 0 to 35; higher numerical scores represented a greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean was based on the mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) model analysis with participants as random effects, treatment, prior alpha-blocker use (yes/no), country (Japan/Korea), visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, and baseline value and placebo lead-in total IPSS change as fixed covariates. (NCT01460342)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-4.5
Tadalafil-6.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Quality of Life (QoL) Index

"The IPSS QoL Index assessed the participant's response to the following question, If you were to spend the rest of your life with your urinary condition just the way it is now, how would you feel about that?. Response options were 0 (Delighted), 1 (Pleased), 2 (Mostly satisfied), 3 (Mixed, about equally satisfied and dissatisfied), 4 (Mostly dissatisfied), 5 (Unhappy), and 6 (Terrible), for a QoL Index Score that ranged from 0 to 6. Least squares (LS) mean was based on the mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) model analysis with participants as random effects, treatment, prior alpha-blocker use (yes/no), country (Japan/Korea), visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, and baseline value and placebo lead-in total IPSS change as fixed covariates." (NCT01460342)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12
Placebo-0.5-0.7-0.9
Tadalafil-0.6-0.8-1.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Storage (Irritative) Subscore

The IPSS Storage (Irritative) Subscore was the sum of Questions 2, 4, and 7 in the IPSS questionnaire. Each question was scored from 0 (no irritative symptoms) to 5 (frequent irritative symptoms) for an IPSS Storage (Irritative) Subscore that ranged from 0 to 15; higher numerical scores represented a greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean was based on the mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) model analysis with participants as random effects, treatment, prior alpha-blocker use (yes/no), country (Japan/Korea), visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, and baseline value and placebo lead-in total IPSS change as fixed covariates. (NCT01460342)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change at 4 WeeksChange at 8 WeeksChange at 12 Weeks
Placebo-0.9-1.3-1.4
Tadalafil-1.2-1.7-2.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore

The IPSS Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore was the sum of Questions 1, 3, 5, and 6 in the IPSS questionnaire. Each question was scored from 0 (no obstructive symptoms) to 5 (frequent obstructive symptoms) for an IPSS Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore that ranged from 0 to 20; higher numerical scores represented a greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean was based on the mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) model analysis with participants as random effects, treatment, prior alpha-blocker use (yes/no), country (Japan/Korea), visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, and baseline value and placebo lead-in total IPSS change as fixed covariates. (NCT01460342)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change at Week 4Change at Week 8Change at Week 12
Placebo-1.8-2.6-3.1
Tadalafil-2.8-3.4-4.0

[back to top]

Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Scale at 12 Weeks

The PGI-I scale measured the participant's perception of improvement at the time of assessment compared with the start of treatment. Scores were 1 (Very much better), 2 (Much improved), 3 (Minimally improved), 4 (No change), 5 (Minimally worse), 6 (Much worse), and 7 (Very much worse). (NCT01460342)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very Much BetterMuch BetterA Little BetterNo ChangeA Little WorseMuch WorseVery Much WorseMissing
Placebo955138907023
Tadalafil1879148552004

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Score of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)

The IPSS Total Score was the sum of Questions 1 through 7 in the IPSS questionnaire. Each question was based on the participant's urination experiences and prostate symptoms during the last month. Scores ranged from 0 (none/no symptoms) to 5 (frequent symptoms) for an IPSS Total Score that ranged from 0 to 35; higher numerical scores represented a greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean was based on the mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) model analysis with participants as random effects, treatment, prior alpha-blocker use (yes/no), country (Japan/Korea), visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, and baseline value and placebo lead-in total IPSS change as fixed covariates. (NCT01460342)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change at Week 4Change at Week 8
Placebo-2.8-4.0
Tadalafil-4.0-5.2

[back to top]

Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at 12 Weeks

The CGI-I measured the clinician's perception of participant improvement at the time of assessment compared with the start of treatment. Scores were 1 (Very much better), 2 (Much improved), 3 (Minimally improved), 4 (No change), 5 (Minimally worse), 6 (Much worse), and 7 (Very much worse). (NCT01460342)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very Much ImprovedMuch ImprovedMinimally ImprovedNo ChangeMinimally WorseMuch WorseVery Much WorseMissing
Placebo1074115938013
Tadalafil14103125591004

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Modified International Prostate Symptom Score (mIPSS) Score at 2 Weeks

The mIPSS Total Score was the sum of Questions 1 through 7 in the mIPSS questionnaire, which was a modified version of the IPSS questionnaire. Questions about the participant's urination experiences and prostate symptoms in the IPSS questionnaire were modified to obtain responses based on time since the last visit rather than during the last month. Each question was scored from 0 (none/no symptoms) to 5 (frequent symptoms) for an mIPSS Total Score that ranged from 0 to 35; higher numerical scores represented a greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean was based on the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, prior alpha-blocker use (yes/no), and country (Japan/Korea) as fixed effects, and baseline value and placebo lead-in total IPSS change as fixed covariates. (NCT01460342)
Timeframe: Baseline, 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-2.1
Tadalafil-2.7

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Palatability of the Tadalafil Suspension

"The Taste Assessment Questionnaire (TAQ) questions were:~TAQRES1: Please rate the bitterness level. TAQRES2: Please rate the sweetness level. TAQRES3: Please rate the aftertaste. TAQRES4: Please rate the overall acceptability of the taste for daily use." (NCT01484431)
Timeframe: Day 35 (high dose)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TAQRES1: Extremely bitterTAQRES1: Very bitterTAQRES1: Moderately bitterTAQRES1: Slightly bitterTAQRES1: Not bitterTAQRES2: Extremely sweetTAQRES2: Very sweetTAQRES2: Moderately sweetTAQRES2: Slightly sweetTAQRES2: Not sweetTAQRES3: Extreme aftertasteTAQRES3: Strong aftertasteTAQRES3: Moderate aftertasteTAQRES3:Slight aftertasteTAQRES3:No aftertasteTAQRES4: Not acceptableTAQRES4: Slightly acceptableTAQRES4: AcceptableTAQRES4: Very acceptable
Light Weight: <25 kg0000310110010020021

[back to top]

Population Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Curve Versus Time at a Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUCtau) for Tadalafil

"Population Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Curve Versus Time at a Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUCtau) for Tadalafil.~The measure of dispersion reported is 90% Prediction Intervals and not Confidence Intervals." (NCT01484431)
Timeframe: Period 1: Pre Dose and 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 Hours Post Dose on Days 1, 14 and 49; with single dose measures on Day 1 and steady-state measurements on Days 14 and 49

,,
Interventionnanograms* hour per milliliter(ng*hr/mL) (Median)
Not Taking BosentanTaking Concomitant Bosentan
20 mg Light Weight: <25 kg81704550
20 mg Middle Weight: 25 kg to <40 kg83905000
40 mg Heavy Weight: ≥40 kg152008990

[back to top]

Population Pharmacokinetics: Average Concentration (Cmean,ss) of for Tadalafil at Steady-State.

"Population Pharmacokinetics: Average Concentration (Cmean,ss) of for tadalafil at steady-state.~The measure of dispersion reported is 90% Prediction Intervals and not Confidence Intervals." (NCT01484431)
Timeframe: Period 1: Pre Dose and 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 Hours Post Dose on Days 1, 14 and 49; with single dose measures on Day 1 and steady-state measurements on Days 14 and 49

,,
Interventionnanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) (Median)
Not Taking BosentanTaking Concomitant Bosentan
20 mg Light Weight <25 kg340190
20 mg Middle Weight: 25 kg to <40 kg350209
40 mg Heavy Weight: ≥40 kg633375

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Worsening

Clinical worsening was defined as any of the following: death, lung or heart transplantation, atrial septostomy or Potts' shunt, hospitalization for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) progression, new onset syncope, initiation of new PAH therapy (including increase in the dose of existing PAH specific concomitant therapy, such as endothelin receptor agonist or beraprost medication), or increase of 1 or more in World Health Organization(WHO) Functional Class (except for participants already in Class IV; only for participants unable to perform the 6 minute walk (6MW) test; worsening of WHO functional class by 1 or more for participants who can perform a 6 minute walk (6MW) test and who have a decrease of ≥ 20% in the 6 minute walk distance (for those participants who are ≥6 years of age). (NCT01484431)
Timeframe: Baseline Up to 27 Months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Light Weight <25 kg50.00
Middle Weight: 25 kg to <40 kg28.57
Heavy Weight: ≥40 kg33.33

[back to top]

Change in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at 60 Minutes for Preclinical Diastolic Dysfunction (PDD) Reporting Group

Value at 60 minutes minus value at baseline. (NCT01544998)
Timeframe: Baseline, 60 minutes after saline load

InterventionmL/min/1.73 m^2 (Mean)
Tadalafil Plus Nesiritide-5.3
Tadalafil Plus Placebo3.9

[back to top]

Change in Natriuresis (Urinary Sodium Excretion) at 60 Minutes for Preclinical Systolic Dysfunction (PSD) Reporting Group

Value at 60 minutes minus value at baseline. (NCT01544998)
Timeframe: Baseline, 60 minutes after saline load

InterventionmEq/min (Mean)
Tadalafil Plus Nesiritide41.8
Tadalafil Plus Placebo88.9

[back to top]

Change in Natriuresis (Urinary Sodium Excretion) at 60 Minutes for Preclinical Diastolic Dysfunction (PDD) Reporting Group

Value at 60 minutes minus value at baseline. (NCT01544998)
Timeframe: Baseline, 60 minutes after saline load

InterventionmEq/min (Mean)
Tadalafil Plus Nesiritide92.5
Tadalafil Plus Placebo97.0

[back to top]

Change in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at 60 Minutes for Preclinical Systolic Dysfunction (PSD) Reporting Group

Value at 60 minutes minus value at baseline. (NCT01544998)
Timeframe: Baseline, 60 minutes after saline load

InterventionmL/min/1.73 m^2 (Mean)
Tadalafil Plus Nesiritide-12.7
Tadalafil Plus Placebo9.4

[back to top]

Change in Urinary Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate (cGMP) at 60 Minutes for Preclinical Systolic Dysfunction (PSD) Reporting Group

Value at 60 minutes minus value at baseline. (NCT01544998)
Timeframe: Baseline, 60 minutes after saline load

Interventionpmol/min (Mean)
Tadalafil Plus Nesiritide2566.9
Tadalafil Plus Placebo34.2

[back to top]

Change in Urinary Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate (cGMP) at 60 Minutes for Preclinical Diastolic Dysfunction (PDD) Reporting Group

Value at 60 minutes minus value at baseline. (NCT01544998)
Timeframe: Baseline, 60 minutes after saline load

Interventionpmol/min (Mean)
Tadalafil Plus Nesiritide1851
Tadalafil Plus Placebo173.4

[back to top]

Exercised Induced Fatigability as Measured by Fatigue Rating Scale After 4 Weeks of Active Drug

The fatigue rating scale is a scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being no fatigue at all and 10 being the worst fatigue the subject can imagine. The subject is asked to rate their level of fatigue in their leg. This test was performed before and immedicately after the Biodex leg fatigue test. Data is presented as change in scale from pre fatigue test to post fatigue test, with a higher score indicating a greater level of fatigue. (NCT01661595)
Timeframe: after 4 weeks of active drug

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Sildenafil / Placebo4.5
Tadalafil / Placebo3.5
Placebo / Sildenafil5.25
Placebo / Tadalafil6.0

[back to top]

Fat Mass as Measured by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry at Week 0.

Fat Mass is calculated from a whole body scan measured on a dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. (NCT01661595)
Timeframe: week 0

Interventionkilograms (Mean)
Sildenafil, Then Placebo32.35
Tadalfil, Then Placebo37.21
Placebo, Then Sildenafil32.72
Placebo, Then Tadalafil32.10

[back to top]

Fat Mass as Measured by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry at Week 4.

Fat Mass is calculated from a whole body scan measured on a dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. (NCT01661595)
Timeframe: week 4

Interventionkilograms (Mean)
Sildenafil, Then Placebo33.16
Tadalfil, Then Placebo37.12
Placebo, Then Sildenafil32.30
Placebo, Then Tadalafil32.47

[back to top]

Exercised Induced Fatigability as Measured by Fatigue Rating Scale After 4 Weeks of Placebo

The fatigue rating scale is a scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being no fatigue at all and 10 being the worst fatigue the subject can imagine. The subject is asked to rate their level of fatigue in their leg. This test was performed before and immedicately after the Biodex leg fatigue test after 4 weeks of placebo. Data is presented as change in scale from pre fatigue test to post fatigue test, with a higher score indicating a greater level of fatigue. (NCT01661595)
Timeframe: after 4 weeks of placebo

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Sildenafil / Placebo4.33
Tadalafil / Placebo2.5
Placebo / Sildenafil7.0
Placebo / Tadalafil4.75

[back to top]

Hemoglobin Level at Week 0

Hemoglobin was measured by University of Texas Medical Branch Clinical Laboratory. Normal ranges are 11.6 - 15.0 g/dL. (NCT01661595)
Timeframe: week 0

Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Sildenafil, Then Placebo13.42
Tadalfil, Then Placebo12.78
Placebo, Then Sildenafil12.4
Placebo, Then Tadalafil13.05

[back to top]

Hematocrit Level Was Measured at 4 Weeks

Hematocrit was measured by University of Texas Medical Branch Clinical Laboratory. Normal ranges are 35.7 - 45.2%. (NCT01661595)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionpercent of red blood cells (Mean)
Sildenafil, Then Placebo39.08
Tadalfil, Then Placebo37.38
Placebo, Then Sildenafil38.13
Placebo, Then Tadalafil39.1

[back to top]

Hematocrit Level Measured at Week 0

Hematocrit was measured by University of Texas Medical Branch Clinical Laboratory. Normal ranges are 35.7 - 45.2%. (NCT01661595)
Timeframe: week 0

Interventionpercent of red blood cells (Mean)
Sildenafil, Then Placebo39.53
Tadalfil, Then Placebo38.55
Placebo, Then Sildenafil37.25
Placebo, Then Tadalafil31.88

[back to top]

Fat Mass as Measured by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry at Week 8.

Fat Mass is calculated from a whole body scan measured on a dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. (NCT01661595)
Timeframe: week 8

Interventionkilograms (Mean)
Sildenafil, Then Placebo33.60
Tadalfil, Then Placebo37.02
Placebo, Then Sildenafil32.40
Placebo, Then Tadalafil32.79

[back to top]

Hematocrit Level Measured at Week 8

Hematocrit was measured by University of Texas Medical Branch Clinical Laboratory. Normal ranges are 35.7 - 45.2%. (NCT01661595)
Timeframe: week 8

Interventionpercent of red blood cells (Mean)
Sildenafil, Then Placebo40.38
Tadalfil, Then Placebo36.6
Placebo, Then Sildenafil38.1
Placebo, Then Tadalafil38.4

[back to top]

Walking Distance at 100% Effort as Measured by Walking Test After 4 Weeks of Placebo

Walking performance will be assessed during 2 minutes of walking in long corridor hallways. Subjects will be asked to walk at 100% effort (as quickly as they can safely walk without running) for 2 minutes. Distance traveled for the 2 minutes will be recorded. The walking test will be completed at week 4 and week 8. Depending on grouping, the week 4 and week 8 measures may be placebo or active drug. Data will be reported as after 4 weeks of placebo or after 4 weeks of active drug. (NCT01661595)
Timeframe: after 4 weeks of placebo

Interventionmeters (Mean)
Sildenafil, Then Placebo203.82
Tadalfil, Then Placebo189.79
Placebo, Then Sildenafil198.41
Placebo, Then Tadalafil202.80

[back to top]

Walking Distance at 100% Effort as Measured by Walking Test After 4 Weeks of Active Drug

Walking performance will be assessed during 2 minutes of walking in long corridor hallways. Subjects will be asked to walk at 100% effort (as quickly as they can safely walk without running) for 2 minutes. Distance traveled for the 2 minutes will be recorded. The walking test will be completed at week 4 and week 8. Depending on grouping, the week 4 and week 8 measures may be placebo or active drug. Data will be reported as after 4 weeks of placebo or after 4 weeks of active drug. (NCT01661595)
Timeframe: after 4 weeks of active drug

Interventionmeter (Mean)
Sildenafil, Then Placebo197.01
Tadalfil, Then Placebo178.56
Placebo, Then Sildenafil200.19
Placebo, Then Tadalafil203.46

[back to top]

Skeletal Muscle Fatigue as Measured by Biodex 4 Pro After 4 Weeks of Placebo

Isokinetic Fatigue Measure (knee extension) is measured on a Biodex System Pro 4 within a 75 degree range of motion. Subjects performed concentric contractions at a fixed speed of 120 degree/sec. 50 contractions were performed at 100% force, one contraction every second. Isokinetic fatigue will be measured at week 4 and week 8. Depending on grouping, the week 4 and week 8 measures may be placebo or active drug. Data will be reported as after 4 weeks of placebo or after 4 weeks of active drug. Data is presented as mean maximum force over all 50 kicks. (NCT01661595)
Timeframe: after 4 weeks of placebo

InterventionNewton-Meters (Mean)
Sildenafil, Then Placebo59.69
Tadalafil, Then Placebo42.07
Placebo, Then Sildenafil67.17
Placebo, Then Tadalafil63.24

[back to top]

Skeletal Muscle Fatigue as Measured by Biodex 4 Pro After 4 Weeks of Active Drug

Isokinetic Fatigue Measure (knee extension) is measured on a Biodex System Pro 4 within a 75 degree range of motion. Subjects performed concentric contractions at a fixed speed of 120 degree/sec. 50 contractions were performed at 100% force, one contraction every second. Isokinetic fatigue will be measured at week 4 and week 8. Depending on grouping, the week 4 and week 8 measures may be placebo or active drug. Data will be reported as after 4 weeks of placebo or after 4 weeks of active drug. Data is presented as mean maximum force over all 50 kicks. (NCT01661595)
Timeframe: after 4 weeks of active drug

InterventionNewton-Meters (Mean)
Sildenafil / Placebo60.90
Tadalafil / Placebo42.48
Placebo / Sildenafil62.68
Placebo / Tadalafil63.25

[back to top]

Perceptual Fatigue as Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Short Form Total Score at Week 8

Fatigue symptoms will be measured using the 30-item Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Short Form, a validated measure that yields one overall score of total fatigue calculated using five sub scales (general, physical, emotional, mental, vigor). With the exception of the vigor sub scale, higher scores indicate greater fatigue. Total fatigue score is calculated by summing the sub categories (general, physical, emotional and mental) and subtracting vigor. Total scores range from -24 to 96, with a higher score indicating more fatigue. (NCT01661595)
Timeframe: week 8

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Sildenafil, Then Placebo9.67
Tadalfil, Then Placebo3.25
Placebo, Then Sildenafil-9.67
Placebo, Then Tadalafil-9.25

[back to top]

Hemoglobin Level Measured at Week 4

Hemoglobin was measured by University of Texas Medical Branch Clinical Laboratory. Normal ranges are 11.6 - 15.0 g/dL. (NCT01661595)
Timeframe: week 4

Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Sildenafil, Then Placebo13.05
Tadalfil, Then Placebo12.03
Placebo, Then Sildenafil12.6
Placebo, Then Tadalafil13.2

[back to top]

Perceptual Fatigue as Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Short Form Total Score at Week 0

Fatigue symptoms will be measured using the 30-item Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Short Form, a validated measure that yields one overall score of total fatigue calculated using five sub scales (general, physical, emotional, mental, vigor). With the exception of the vigor sub scale, higher scores indicate greater fatigue. Total fatigue score is calculated by summing the sub categories (general, physical, emotional and mental) and subtracting vigor. Total scores range from -24 to 96, with a higher score indicating more fatigue. (NCT01661595)
Timeframe: Week 0

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Sildenafil, Then Placebo9.66
Tadalfil, Then Placebo-7.5
Placebo, Then Sildenafil-8
Placebo, Then Tadalafil-3.75

[back to top]

Maximum Peak Isometric Leg Strength as Measured by Biodex Pro4 After 4 Weeks of Placebo

Peak isometric strength is measured on a Biodex System 4 Pro. This test is isolated to the quadricep muscle of one leg. Isometric test is performed at 90 degrees with 5 seconds of force production for each contraction and 15 seconds of rest. 1 set of 3 contractions at 100% force performed. Isometric strength was measured at week 4 and week 8. Depending on grouping, the week 4 and week 8 measures may be placebo or active drug. Data will be reported as after 4 weeks of placebo or after 4 weeks of active drug. (NCT01661595)
Timeframe: after 4 weeks of placebo

InterventionNewton-Meters (Mean)
Sildenafil, Then Placebo145.86
Tadalfil, Then Placebo104.17
Placebo, Then Sildenafil149.14
Placebo, Then Tadalafil148.34

[back to top]

Maximum Peak Isometric Leg Strength as Measured by Biodex Pro4 After 4 Weeks of Active Drug.

Peak isometric strength is measured on a Biodex System 4 Pro. This test is isolated to the quadricep muscle of one leg. Isometric test is performed at 90 degrees with 5 seconds of force production for each contraction and 15 seconds of rest. 1 set of 3 contractions at 100% force performed. Isometric strength was measured at week 4 and week 8. Depending on grouping, the week 4 and week 8 measures may be placebo or active drug. Data will be reported as after 4 weeks of placebo or after 4 weeks of active drug. (NCT01661595)
Timeframe: after 4 weeks of active drug

InterventionNewton-Meters (Mean)
Sildenafil, Then Placebo140.09
Tadalfil, Then Placebo110.39
Placebo, Then Sildenafil133.81
Placebo, Then Tadalafil139.96

[back to top]

Maximum Peak Isokinetic Leg Strength as Measured by Biodex Pro4 After 4 Weeks of Placebo.

Isokinetic strength (knee extension) is measured on a Biodex System Pro 4 within a 75 degree range of motion. Subjects performed concentric contractions at a fixed speed of 120 degree/sec. 1 set of 3 contractions were performed at 100% force. Isokinetic strength will be measured at week 4 and week 8. Depending on grouping, the week 4 and week 8 measures may be placebo or active drug. Data will be reported as after 4 weeks of placebo or after 4 weeks of active drug. (NCT01661595)
Timeframe: after 4 weeks of placebo

InterventionNewton-Meters (Mean)
Sildenafil, Then Placebo105.15
Tadalfil, Then Placebo78.59
Placebo, Then Sildenafil117.71
Placebo, Then Tadalafil111.67

[back to top]

Perceptual Fatigue as Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Short Form Total Score at Week 4

Fatigue symptoms will be measured using the 30-item Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Short Form, a validated measure that yields one overall score of total fatigue calculated using five sub scales (general, physical, emotional, mental, vigor). With the exception of the vigor sub scale, higher scores indicate greater fatigue. Total fatigue score is calculated by summing the sub categories (general, physical, emotional and mental) and subtracting vigor. Total scores range from -24 to 96, with a higher score indicating more fatigue. (NCT01661595)
Timeframe: week 4

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Sildenafil, Then Placebo6.33
Tadalfil, Then Placebo-3.33
Placebo, Then Sildenafil-6.33
Placebo, Then Tadalafil-3.5

[back to top]

Lean Body Mass as Measured by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry at Week 8.

Lean Body Mass is calculated from a whole body scan measured on a dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. (NCT01661595)
Timeframe: week 8

Interventionkilograms (Mean)
Sildenafil, Then Placebo46.22
Tadalfil, Then Placebo40.76
Placebo, Then Sildenafil52.09
Placebo, Then Tadalafil55.10

[back to top]

Lean Body Mass as Measured by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry at Week 4.

Lean Body Mass is calculated from a whole body scan measured on a dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. (NCT01661595)
Timeframe: week 4

Interventionkilograms (Mean)
Sildenafil, Then Placebo46.29
Tadalfil, Then Placebo41.02
Placebo, Then Sildenafil50.61
Placebo, Then Tadalafil54.85

[back to top]

Lean Body Mass as Measured by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry at Week 0.

Lean Body Mass is calculated from a whole body scan measured on a dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. (NCT01661595)
Timeframe: week 0

Interventionkilograms (Mean)
Sildenafil, Then Placebo44.60
Tadalfil, Then Placebo41.43
Placebo, Then Sildenafil49.93
Placebo, Then Tadalafil54.45

[back to top]

Hemoglobin Level Measured at Week 8

Hemoglobin was measured by University of Texas Medical Branch Clinical Laboratory. Normal ranges are 11.6 - 15.0 g/dL. (NCT01661595)
Timeframe: week 8

Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Sildenafil, Then Placebo13.55
Tadalfil, Then Placebo11.97
Placebo, Then Sildenafil12.5
Placebo, Then Tadalafil12.95

[back to top]

Maximum Peak Isokinetic Leg Strength as Measured by Biodex Pro4 After 4 Weeks of Active Drug

Isokinetic strength (knee extension) is measured on a Biodex System Pro 4 within a 75 degree range of motion. Subjects performed concentric contractions at a fixed speed of 120 degree/sec. 1 set of 3 contractions were performed at 100% force. Isokinetic strength will be measured at week 4 and week 8. Depending on grouping, the week 4 and week 8 measures may be placebo or active drug. Data will be reported as after 4 weeks of placebo or after 4 weeks of active drug. (NCT01661595)
Timeframe: after 4 weeks of active drug

InterventionNewton-Meters (Mean)
Sildenafil, Then Placebo106.79
Tadalfil, Then Placebo79.33
Placebo, Then Sildenafil116.48
Placebo, Then Tadalafil114.75

[back to top]

Period 1: Change From Baseline to Week 24 in a 6 Minute Walk (MW) Distance in Meters

6MWD in meters assessed in a subset of participants who are ≥6 to <18 years of age who are developmentally capable of performing a 6MW test. Change from baseline was derived using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) with terms for treatment group, visit, baseline 6MWD, and treatment-by-visit interaction. (NCT01824290)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

InterventionMeters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo36.60
Tadalafil60.48

[back to top]

Period 1: Percentage of Participants Who Experience CW

Clinical worsening was defined as any of the following: death,lung or heart transplantation,atrial septostomy or Potts' shunt,hospitalization for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension(PAH) progression,new onset syncope, initiation of new PAH therapy(including increase in the dose of existing PAH specific concomitant therapy,such as endothelin receptor agonist or beraprost medication),or increase of 1 or more in World Health Organization(WHO) Functional Class(except for participants already in Class IV; only for participants unable to perform the 6 minute walk(6MW) test;worsening of WHO functional class by 1 or more for participants who can perform a 6 minute walk(6MW) test and who have a decrease of ≥ 20% in the 6 minute walk distance(for those participants who are ≥6 years of age).Criteria for CW(from Period 1) were adjudicated by an independent,blinded study-specific Clinical Endpoint Committee(CEC).This adjudication was used for data analysis, and was not used to guide subject treatment. (NCT01824290)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo0
Tadalafil0

[back to top]

Period 1: Time to Adjudicated Clinical Worsening (CW)

Clinical worsening was defined as any of the following: death,lung or heart transplantation,atrial septostomy or Potts' shunt,hospitalization for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension(PAH) progression,new onset syncope,initiation of new PAH therapy(including increase in the dose of existing PAH specific concomitant therapy,such as endothelin receptor agonist or beraprost medication), or increase of 1 or more in World Health Organization(WHO) Functional Class(except for participants already in Class IV;only for participants unable to perform the 6 minute walk(6MW) test;worsening of WHO functional class by 1 or more for participants who can perform a 6 minute walk(6MW) test and who have a decrease of ≥ 20% in the 6 minute walk distance(for those participants who are ≥6 years of age). Criteria for CW(from Period 1) were adjudicated by an independent,blinded study-specific Clinical Endpoint Committee(CEC).This adjudication was used for data analysis, and was not used to guide subject treatment. (NCT01824290)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 24

InterventionWeeks (Median)
PlaceboNA
TadalafilNA

[back to top]

Period 2: Percentage of Participants Who Experience CW

Clinical worsening was defined as any of the following: death, lung or heart transplantation, atrial septostomy or Potts' shunt, hospitalization for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) progression, new onset syncope, initiation of new PAH therapy (including increase in the dose of existing PAH specific concomitant therapy, such as endothelin receptor agonist or beraprost medication), or increase of 1 or more in World Health Organization(WHO) Functional Class (except for participants already in Class IV; only for participants unable to perform the 6 minute walk (6MW) test; worsening of WHO functional class by 1 or more for participants who can perform a 6 minute walk (6MW) test and who have a decrease of ≥ 20% in the 6 minute walk distance (for those participants who are ≥6 years of age). (NCT01824290)
Timeframe: Period 2 Baseline through Study Completion (Up to 24 Months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo/Tadalafil - Open-Label Treatment12.5
Tadalafil/Tadalafil - Open-Label Treatment18.8

[back to top]

Period 1: Pharmacokinetics (PK): Apparent Clearance (CL/F) of Tadalafil at Steady-state

Period 1: Pharmacokinetics (PK): Apparent Clearance (CL/F) of Tadalafil at steady-state (NCT01824290)
Timeframe: Week 2, Week 4, Week 16 and Week 24

InterventionLiter Per Hour (L/hr) (Geometric Mean)
With concomitant bosentan
40 mg Tadalafil4.49

[back to top]

Period 1: Pharmacokinetics (PK): Apparent Clearance (CL/F) of Tadalafil at Steady-state

Period 1: Pharmacokinetics (PK): Apparent Clearance (CL/F) of Tadalafil at steady-state (NCT01824290)
Timeframe: Week 2, Week 4, Week 16 and Week 24

InterventionLiter Per Hour (L/hr) (Geometric Mean)
With concomitant bosentanNo bosentan (ERA: Macitentan)
20 mg Tadalafil3.63NA

[back to top]

Period 2: Time to First Occurrence of CW

Clinical worsening was defined as any of the following: death, lung or heart transplantation, atrial septostomy or Potts' shunt, hospitalization for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) progression, new onset syncope, initiation of new PAH therapy (including increase in the dose of existing PAH specific concomitant therapy, such as endothelin receptor agonist or beraprost medication), or increase of 1 or more in World Health Organization(WHO) Functional Class (except for participants already in Class IV; only for participants unable to perform the 6 minute walk (6MW) test; worsening of WHO functional class by 1 or more for participants who can perform a 6 minute walk (6MW) test and who have a decrease of ≥ 20% in the 6 minute walk distance (for those participants who are ≥6 years of age). (NCT01824290)
Timeframe: Period 2 Baseline through Study Completion (Up to 24 Months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Placebo/Tadalafil - Open-Label TreatmentNA
Tadalafil/Tadalafil - Open-Label TreatmentNA

[back to top]

Pulmonary Vascular Resistance

Pulmonary vascular resistance assessed on right heart catheterization is a hemodynamic measurement of pulmonary vascular remodeling. (NCT01862536)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionmmHg (Median)
Placebo4.26
Tadalafil2.69

[back to top]

Change in 6 Minute Walk Test

Change from baseline in distance walked in 6 minutes. (NCT01862536)
Timeframe: The change in distance walked when assessed at 3 months following trial initiation as compared to baseline, similarly at 6 months compared to baseline, at 9 months compared to baseline and at 12 months compared to baseline.

,
InterventionMeters walked in 6 minutes (Median)
Change in 6 MWT from baseline to 3 monthsChange in 6 MWT from baseline to 6 monthsChange in 6 MWT from baseline to 9 monthsChange in 6 MWT from baseline to 12 months
Placebo7.0016.00-18.0021.00
Tadalafil16.604.908.9316.76

[back to top]

Tricuspid Annular Plane Excursion (TAPSE)

The tricuspid annular plane excursion is an echocardiographic measurement of right ventricular systolic dysfunction. (NCT01862536)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionmm (Median)
Placebo2.08
Tadalafil2.12

[back to top] [back to top]

Maximum VO2

Measure of aerobic fitness on exercise assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise test. (NCT01862536)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionmL/kg/min (Median)
Tadalafil13.6

[back to top]

Mean Pulmonary Artery Pressure

Mean pulmonary artery pressure assessed by right heart catheterization is a hemodynamic measurement of pulmonary hypertension severity. (NCT01862536)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionWood units (Median)
Placebo33.00
Tadalafil29.00

[back to top]

N-type Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) Concentration

Plasma BNP concentration is a biochemical marker that correlates positively with pulmonary hypertension severity. (NCT01862536)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Placebo37.50
Tadalafil47.81

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Six Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) in Meters

"6MWD measured the distance in meters a participant was able to walk in 6 minutes. The study used 6MWD procedure modified specifically for use in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), including standardized verbal encouragement at specific intervals to maintain attention to the test, and use of a safety chaser to walk behind the participant during testing (McDonald et al., 2010a). The LS mean (LSM) change from baseline, standard error was derived using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) methodology with factors for pooled country, treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction and baseline 6MWD as a covariate." (NCT01865084)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48

InterventionMeters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-50.99
0.3 mg/kg Tadalafil-64.71
0.6 mg/kg Tadalafil-59.08

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Global Score

The NSAA is a functional scale specifically designed for ambulant boys with DMD that can provide additional information on motor functions important in maintaining normal ambulation and other activities important to everyday life. The NSAA is a 17-item evaluation of standing, ability to transition from lying to sitting, sitting to standing, and other mobility assessments. Each of the 17 items is evaluated on an ordinal scale of 0, 1, or 2, with higher scores reflecting better performance on the assessment, for a total maximum score of 34. This score was transformed to a 0 to 100 scale for the key analysis (referred to as linearized), with higher transformed scores reflecting better performance.The LS mean (LSM) change from baseline standard error was derived using mixed model repeated measures methodology (MMRM) with factors for pooled country, treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction and Day 1 value as baseline covariate. (NCT01865084)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-8.80
0.3 mg/kg Tadalafil-9.31
0.6 mg/kg Tadalafil-8.96

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Apparent Clearance (CL/F) of Tadalafil

The data reported are population estimate and inter-patient variability. (NCT01865084)
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 12, 24 and 36: -1 Hour up to 24 Hours Postdose

InterventionLiter per hour (L/hr) (Geometric Mean)
0.3 mg/kg Tadalafil and 0.6 mg/kg Tadalafil1.79

[back to top]

Time to Persistent 10% Worsening in 6MWD

Time on study until the 6MWD becomes 10% less than the baseline 6MWD and continues at that level or lower until the end of study. (NCT01865084)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 48

InterventionDays (Median)
PlaceboNA
0.3 mg/kg TadalafilNA
0.6 mg/kg TadalafilNA

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) Scores

"PODCI includes a Global Functioning Scale and 5 core scales:Upper Extremity and Physical Function,Transfer/Basic Mobility, Sports/Physical Functioning, Pain/Comfort,and Happiness.The Global Functioning Scale is the mean of the mean scores from 4 of the 5 core scales (all except the happiness core scale).The following PODCI scores were prespecified in the protocol for analysis: Global Functioning, Upper Extremity and Physical Function,Transfer/Basic Mobility, and Sports/Physical Functioning. The Global Functioning Scale and each of the core scales were standardized so that a score of 0 represents a poor outcome/worse health, while 100 is the best possible outcome/best health (i.e., complete range of each score is 0 to 100, with higher scores representing better functioning). The LS mean (LSM) change from baseline,standard error was derived using MMRM with factors for pooled country, treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction and baseline PODC scale as covariate." (NCT01865084)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48

,,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Global Functioning Scale (n=41,34,34)Upper Extremity & Physical FunctionTransfer/Basic Mobility Core ScaleSports/Physical Functioning Core Scale
0.3 mg/kg Tadalafil-7.36-3.73-12.50-11.98
0.6 mg/kg Tadalafil-7.34-2.47-12.78-7.88
Placebo-8.81-5.47-14.26-12.47

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Timed Function Tests in Seconds

Timed function tests included time it took to rise from floor, walk 10 meters, ascend 4 stairs, and descend 4 stairs.The lower the time in seconds taken, the better the performance. The LS mean change from baseline, standard error, was derived using mixed model repeated measures methodology (MMRM) with factors for pooled country, treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction and Day 1 value as baseline covariate. (NCT01865084)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48

,,
InterventionSeconds (Least Squares Mean)
Rise from the Floor(n=92,75,89)10 Meter Walk/Run(n=105,90,100)Stair Climb (n=116,96,110)Stair Descend(n=115,95,110)
0.3 mg/kg Tadalafil3.600.954.102.07
0.6 mg/kg Tadalafil4.811.125.823.27
Placebo4.161.113.963.19

[back to top]

Time to Persistent 10% Worsening in Timed Function Tests (TFT)

"Time on study until the TFT becomes 10% worse than the baseline TFT and continues at that level or lower until the end of study. The time to persistent 10% worsening is the observed time after baseline until the first observed timepoint where their time used for the TFTs is >110% of the baseline time and all the time values observed afterward are also >110% of baseline. If the participant discontinues prior to experiencing persistent worsening, this outcome for the participant is censored at the date of discontinuation of the double-blind period.~Only participants with complete evaluable data were analyzed. Complete evaluable data was defined as having baseline measurement, complete dates at evaluable visits and a post-baseline measurement at each evaluable visit." (NCT01865084)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 48

,,
InterventionDays (Median)
Rise from the Floor (n=81,67,77)Stair Climb (n=112,91,107)10 Meter Walk/Run (n=98,83,91)Stair Descend (n=110,91,108)
0.3 mg/kg TadalafilNA259.0NANA
0.6 mg/kg TadalafilNA253.0NANA
Placebo253.0255.0NANA

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 2 of the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Questionnaire at Week 12

"Participant-assessed diary assesses the mean change from baseline in the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q2, Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina?. The SEP Q2 score was determined as the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q2 out of all sexual attempts recorded during the time period. Change is defined as the percentage of yes responses at endpoint minus the percentage of yes responses at baseline. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment, country/region, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe), centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), the centered baseline-by-treatment and the treatment-by-country/region interactions. The interaction terms are removed if p >= 0.10." (NCT01937871)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Intervention"percentage of yes responses" (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo10.90
5 mg Tadalafil23.87
0.2 mg Tamsulosin6.84

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in IIEF Intercourse Satisfaction at Week 12

IIEF is a 15 item self-reported questionnaire used to assess overall erectile function and satisfaction during the past 4 weeks. IIEF-IS is the sum of Questions 6,7 and 8 of the IIEF. Scores range from 0(low/no satisfaction) to 5(high satisfaction) for each question, with the total possible score for the 3 questions ranging from 0 to 15.Higher scores were indicative of an increase in intercourse satisfaction. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from MMRM. The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, baseline LUTS severity (moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction,centered baseline value(defined as the baseline value for a participant- the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p >= 0.10. (NCT01937871)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.05
5 mg Tadalafil1.08
0.2 mg Tamsulosin0.41

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 12

CGI-I measures clinician's perception of participant improvement at the time of assessment (compared with the start of treatment) with scores ranging from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). (NCT01937871)
Timeframe: Week 12

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Very Much WorseMuch WorseA Little WorseNo ChangeA Little BetterMuch BetterVery Much Better
0.2 mg Tamsulosin00139854110
5 mg Tadalafil1056614012021
Placebo0212911309216

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 3 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8

"Participant-assessed diary assesses the mean change from baseline in the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q3, Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?. The SEP Q3 score is determined as the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q3 out of all sexual attempts recorded during the time period. Change was defined as the percentage of yes responses at endpoint minus percentage of yes responses at baseline. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment, country/region, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe), centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), the centered baseline-by-treatment and the treatment-by-country/region interactions. The interaction terms are removed if p >= 0.10." (NCT01937871)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4; Baseline, Week 8

,,
Intervention"percentage of yes responses" (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4Week 8
0.2 mg Tamsulosin9.5714.98
5 mg Tadalafil23.3832.27
Placebo7.4114.08

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 2 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 4 and Week 8

"Participant-assessed diary assesses the mean change from baseline in the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q2, Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina?. The SEP Q2 score is determined as the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q2 out of all sexual attempts recorded during the time period. Change was defined as the percentage of yes responses at endpoint minus the percentage of yes responses at baseline. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment, country/region, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe), centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), the centered baseline-by-treatment and the treatment-by-country/region interactions. The interaction terms are removed if p >= 0.10." (NCT01937871)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4; Baseline, Week 8

,,
Intervention"percentage of yes responses" (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4Week 8
0.2 mg Tamsulosin6.217.42
5 mg Tadalafil20.5323.22
Placebo5.4310.79

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in IIEF EF at Week 4 and Week 8

IIEF is a 15 item self-reported questionnaire used to assess overall erectile function and satisfaction during the past 4 weeks. IIEF- EF is the sum of Questions 1-5 and 15 of the IIEF. Questions 1-5 were scored 0 (low/no erectile function) to 5 (high erectile function) and Question 15 was scored 1 (very low confidence) to 5 (very high confidence) with a total score ranging from 1 to 30. Higher scores represent better erectile function. LS mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from MMRM. The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, baseline LUTS severity (moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p >= 0.10. (NCT01937871)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4; Baseline, Week 8

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4Week 8
0.2 mg Tamsulosin1.432.19
5 mg Tadalafil4.504.77
Placebo1.231.51

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Yes Responses to Question 3 of the SEP Questionnaire at Week 12

"Participant-assessed diary assesses the mean change from baseline in the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q3, Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?.The SEP Q3 score is determined as the percentage of yes responses to SEP Q3 out of all sexual attempts recorded during the time period. Change was defined as the percentage of yes responses at endpoint minus percentage of yes responses at baseline. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The model includes terms for treatment, country/region, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe), centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), the centered baseline-by-treatment and the treatment-by-country/region interactions. The interaction terms are removed if p >= 0.10." (NCT01937871)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Intervention"percentage of yes responses" (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo15.96
5 mg Tadalafil36.62
0.2 mg Tamsulosin17.42

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total IPSS at Week 4 and Week 8

IPSS Total Score is the sum of Questions 1 through 7 of the IPSS questionnaire. Each question is scored from 0 (none/no symptoms) to 5 (frequent symptoms) for an IPSS Total Score ranging from 0 to 35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, prior alpha-blocker therapy, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe),visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p >= 0.10. (NCT01937871)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4; Baseline, Week 8

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4Week 8
0.2 mg Tamsulosin-3.92-4.44
5 mg Tadalafil-4.10-4.85
Placebo-2.99-3.50

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in IIEF Subscores at Week 12

IIEF Question 3 asks how often a participant was able to penetrate his partner over the past 4 weeks. Scores range from 0 (did not attempt intercourse) to 5 (almost always or always). IIEF Question 4 asks whether/how often a participant was able to maintain an erection after penetration over the past 4 weeks. Scores range from 0 (did not attempt intercourse) to 5 (almost always or always). Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from MMRM. The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, baseline LUTS severity (moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p >= 0.10. (NCT01937871)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
IIEF Question 3IIEF Question 4
0.2 mg Tamsulosin0.390.50
5 mg Tadalafil0.870.87
Placebo0.280.30

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 12

IPSS Total Score is the sum of Questions 1 through 7 of the IPSS questionnaire. Each question was scored from 0 (none/no symptoms) to 5 (frequent symptoms) for an IPSS Total Score ranging from 0 to 35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM).The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, prior alpha-blocker therapy, baseline Erectile dysfunction (ED) severity (mild/moderate/severe),visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment.The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p >= 0.10. (NCT01937871)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-4.08
5 mg Tadalafil-5.49
0.2 mg Tamsulosin-4.92

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR) at Week 12

The amount of urine remaining in the bladder after void completion. (NCT01937871)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionmilliliters (mL) (Mean)
Placebo-6.3
5 mg Tadalafil-3.8
0.2 mg Tamsulosin-9.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Modified International Prostate Symptom Score (mIPSS) at Week 2

The modified IPSS is the total IPSS collected at 2 weeks post-baseline.The total IPSS is obtained by combining the scores of the responses to component questions 1 through 7. Each question is scored from 0-5 for a total IPSS range of 0-35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from ANCOVA. The model includes terms for treatment, country/region, prior alpha-blocker use and baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe), centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), the centered baseline-by-treatment and the treatment-by-country/region interactions. The interaction terms are removed if p >= 0.10. (NCT01937871)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-2.19
5 mg Tadalafil-3.40
0.2 mg Tamsulosin-3.20

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in IPSS Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore at Week 12

IPSS voiding (obstructive) subscore is the sum of Questions 1, 3, 5 and 6 of the IPSS questionnaire. Scores ranged from 0 (no obstructive symptoms) to 5 (frequent obstructive symptoms), with total subscore of the 4 questions of the obstructive score ranging from 0 to 20; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, prior alpha-blocker therapy, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe),visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. (NCT01937871)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-2.42
5 mg Tadalafil-3.49
0.2 mg Tamsulosin-3.07

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in IPSS Storage (Irritative) Subscore at Week 12

IPSS Storage (Irritative) subscore is the sum of Questions 2, 4 and 7 of the IPSS questionnaire. Scores ranged from 0 (no irritative symptoms) to 5 (frequent irritative symptoms), with total subscore of the 3 questions for irritative subscore ranging from 0 to 15; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, prior alpha-blocker therapy, baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. (NCT01937871)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.68
5 mg Tadalafil-2.01
0.2 mg Tamsulosin-1.90

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Uroflowmetry Measures at Week 12

"Qmax is defined as the peak urine flow rate (measured in milliliters per second [mL/sec] using standard calibrated flowmeter).~At each visit, a uroflowmetry assessment was considered valid and the data were included only if the prevoid total bladder volume (assessed by ultrasound) was >=150 to <=550 milliliters (mL) and the voided volume (Vcomp) was >=125 mL. Changes in Qmax from baseline to endpoint in the double-blind treatment period were analyzed using Type III sums of squares ANOVA on rank-transformed data with a term for treatment group." (NCT01937871)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

InterventionMilliliters/seconds (mL/sec) (Mean)
Placebo1.5
5 mg Tadalafil1.9
0.2 mg Tamsulosin2.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in IPSS Quality of Life (QoL) Index at Week 12

"IPSS QoL assess participant response to the following question:If you were to spend the rest of your life with your urinary condition just the way it is now, how would you feel about that?. Response options are Delighted(0),Pleased(1);Mostly satisfied(2);mixed about equally satisfied and dissatisfied(3);Mostly dissatisfied(4);Unhappy(5);Terrible(6),with a total ranging from 0 to 6; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares(LS) mean of change from baseline(bl) to endpoint is from MMRM.The model includes effects for treatment,country/region, prior alpha-blocker therapy,baseline ED severity (mild/moderate/severe),visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered bl value (defined as the bl value for a participant -the overall bl mean value),placebo lead-in total IPSS change(change from Visit 2 at Visit 3),centered bl-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions." (NCT01937871)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.85
5 mg Tadalafil-0.98
0.2 mg Tamsulosin-1.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in IIEF Sexual Desire at Week 12

IIEF is a 15 item self-reported questionnaire used to assess overall erectile function and satisfaction during the past 4 weeks. IIEF sexual desire is the sum of Q11 and Q12. Scores ranged from 1 (low/almost never) to 5 (very high/almost always) for each question, with the total possible score for the 2 questions ranging from 2 to 10. Higher scores were indicative of increased sexual desire. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from MMRM. The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, baseline LUTS severity (moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p >= 0.10. (NCT01937871)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.46
5 mg Tadalafil1.12
0.2 mg Tamsulosin0.28

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Week 12

PGI-I measures a participant's perception of improvement at the time of assessment compared with the start of treatment. Score ranges from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). (NCT01937871)
Timeframe: Week 12

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Very Much WorseMuch WorseA Little WorseNo ChangeA Little BetterMuch BetterVery Much Better
0.2 mg Tamsulosin0013793396
5 mg Tadalafil0225316411913
Placebo03587169735

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in IPSS at Week 12

IPSS Total Score is the sum of Questions 1 through 7 of the IPSS questionnaire. Each question is scored from 0 (none/no symptoms) to 5 (frequent symptoms) for an IPSS Total Score ranging from 0 to 35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM).The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, prior alpha-blocker therapy, baseline Erectile dysfunction (ED) severity (mild/moderate/severe),visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p >= 0.10. (NCT01937871)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-4.08
5 mg Tadalafil-5.49
0.2 mg Tamsulosin-4.92

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Erectile Function (EF) Domain at Week 12

IIEF is a 15 item self-reported questionnaire to assess overall erectile function and satisfaction during the past 4 weeks. IIEF- EF is the sum of Questions 1-5 and 15 of the IIEF. Questions 1-5 are scored 0(low/no erectile function) to 5(high erectile function) and Question 15 is scored 1(very low confidence) to 5(very high confidence) with a total score ranging from 1 to 30.Higher scores represent better erectile function.LS mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from MMRM.The model includes effects for treatment,country/region,baseline lower urinary tract symptoms(LUTS) severity (moderate/severe),visit,treatment-by-visit interaction,centered baseline value(defined as the baseline value for a participant-the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change(change from Visit 2 at Visit 3),centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions.The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p >= 0.10. (NCT01937871)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo1.88
5 mg Tadalafil5.24
0.2 mg Tamsulosin2.64

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in IIEF Overall Satisfaction (OS) at Week 12

IIEF is a 15 item self-reported questionnaire used to assess overall erectile function and satisfaction during the past 4 weeks. IIEF-OS is the sum of Questions 13 and 14. Scores range from 1 (low/no satisfaction) to 5 (high satisfaction) for each question, with a total subscore ranging from 2 to 10;higher scores represent better erectile function. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from an analysis mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, baseline LUTS severity (moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction,centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p >= 0.10. (NCT01937871)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.62
5 mg Tadalafil1.54
0.2 mg Tamsulosin0.71

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in IIEF Orgasmic Function at Week 12

IIEF is a 15 item self-reported questionnaire used to assess overall erectile function and satisfaction during the past 4 weeks. IIEF orgasmic function is the sum of Q9 and Q10 of the IIEF. Scores ranged from 0 (no stimulation) to 5 (almost always) for each question, with the total possible score for the 2 questions ranging from 0 to 10. Higher scores were indicative of better orgasmic function. Least squares (LS) mean of change from baseline to endpoint is from MMRM. The model includes effects for treatment, country/region, baseline LUTS severity (moderate/severe), visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, centered baseline value (defined as the baseline value for a participant - the overall baseline mean value), placebo lead-in total IPSS change (change from Visit 2 at Visit 3), centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country/region interactions. The centered baseline-by-treatment and treatment-by-country interactions was removed if p >= 0.10. (NCT01937871)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.28
5 mg Tadalafil1.31
0.2 mg Tamsulosin0.57

[back to top]

Change in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)

Change in total GFR as measured by ml/1.72m2 (NCT01970176)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionml/1.72m2 (Median)
Tadalafil-6.2
Placebo4.5

[back to top]

Change in Urinary Cyclic Guanosine 3',5'-Monophosphate (cGMP) Hormone Excretion

Change in total urinary cGMP hormone excretion as measured by pmol/min (NCT01970176)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionpmol/min (Median)
Tadalafil-71.1
Placebo51.6

[back to top]

Change in Urinary Sodium Excretion

Change in total urinary sodium excretion as measured by MEq/min (NCT01970176)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

InterventionMEq/min (Median)
Tadalafil29.5
Placebo25.1

[back to top]

Change in Urinary Sodium Excretion

Change in total urinary sodium excretion as measured by MEq/min (NCT02058095)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

InterventionMEq/min (Median)
Tadalafil74.43
Placebo29.11

[back to top]

Change in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)

Change in total GFR as measured by ml/1.72m2 (NCT02058095)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionml/1.72 m2 (Median)
Tadalafil7
Placebo-9

[back to top]

Change in Urinary Cyclic Guanosine 3',5'-Monophosphate (cGMP) Hormone Excretion

Change in total urinary cGMP hormone excretion as measured by pmol/min (NCT02058095)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionpmol/min (Median)
Tadalafil450
Placebo-130.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 4 Weeks in 24 Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM)

The LS mean change in blood pressure is calculated after adjusting for baseline, treatment and race using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). (NCT02194465)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 Weeks

,,,,,,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
SBPDBP
13 mg LY2623091-11.1-4.7
13 mg LY2623091 + 20 mg Tadalafil-10.4-6.2
20 mg Tadalafil-6.3-5.6
24.5 mg LY2623091-10.4-3.4
6 mg LY2623091-4.9-1.7
Placebo0.31.0
Spironolactone-6.4-2.0

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of LY2623091

(NCT02194465)
Timeframe: 2 hours post-dose at 4 Weeks

Interventionnanogram/milliliter (ng/ml) (Geometric Mean)
6 mg LY2623091122
13 mg LY2623091228
24.5 mg LY2623091379
13 mg LY2623091 + 20 mg Tadalafil206

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 4 Weeks in Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)

Change from baseline in DBP as measured by a cuff. LS mean change from baseline was calculated using a MMRM with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT02194465)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 Weeks

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.5
6 mg LY2623091-5.6
13 mg LY2623091-4.8
24.5 mg LY2623091-7.1
13 mg LY2623091 + 20 mg Tadalafil-6.8
20 mg Tadalafil-6.6
Spironolactone-1.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 4 Weeks in Seated Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)

Change from baseline in SBP as measured by a cuff. Least squares (LS) mean change from baseline was calculated using a mixed model repeating measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT02194465)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 Weeks

Interventionmillimeter of mercury (mmHg) (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.5
6 mg LY2623091-13.1
13 mg LY2623091-14.6
24.5 mg LY2623091-14.3
13 mg LY2623091 + 20 mg Tadalafil-11.8
20 mg Tadalafil-7.1
Spironolactone-15.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 4 Weeks in Serum Potassium

Potassium measurement as measured by standard laboratory tests. The LS mean change in potassium is calculated using MMRM with adjustment for baseline, treatment, visit, treatment*visit and race. (NCT02194465)
Timeframe: Baseline, 4 Weeks

Interventionmillimoles/L (mmol/L) (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.04
6 mg LY26230910.10
13 mg LY26230910.11
24.5 mg LY26230910.25
13 mg LY2623091 + 20 mg Tadalafil0.10
20 mg Tadalafil-0.06
Spironolactone0.30

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing at Least One Adverse Event Leading to Discontinuation

Data presented are the number of participants who experienced 1 or more AEs (all causalities and drug-related) and serious AEs (SAEs) that lead to discontinuation. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events, regardless of causality, is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT02224846)
Timeframe: Baseline through Month 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
2.5 mg/5 mg Tadalafil1.4
5 mg Tadalafil0.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing at Least One Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (Serious or Non-Serious)

A Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) was defined as an event that first occurs or worsens (increases in severity) after baseline, regardless of causality or severity. The percentage of participants with TEAEs was calculated by dividing the number of participants with at least 1 TEAE over the 12-Month treatment period by the total number of participants analyzed, multiplied by 100%. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events, regardless of causality, is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT02224846)
Timeframe: Baseline through Month 12

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
2.5 mg/5 mg Tadalafil33.8
5 mg Tadalafil35.9

[back to top]

"Percentage of Participants With Yes Responses to Global Assessment Questions (GAQ)1 and GAQ2"

"Participants with yes responses to GAQ Question 1 (GAQ1) and GAQ Question 2 (GAQ2) of the GAQ questionnaire at Month 3 and Month 12.~GAQ1: Has the treatment you have been taking during this study improved your erections? GAQ2: If yes, has the treatment improved your ability to engage in sexual activity?" (NCT02224846)
Timeframe: Month 3, Month12, Month 24

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 3: GAQ1Month 12: GAQ1Month 24: GAQ1Month 3: GAQ2Month 12: GAQ2Month 24: GAQ2
2.5 mg/5 mg Tadalafil89.696.696.886.595.596.2
5 mg Tadalafil95.797.595.792.196.194.5

[back to top]

"Percentage of Participants With Yes Responses to Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Diary"

Participant-assessed diary has 5 questions(QI-Q5): 4 of the 5 questions were analyzed. Q2: successful penetration, Q3: successful intercourse, Q4: satisfied with erection, and Q5: satisfied with sexual experience) for each sexual encounter made over a specified period of time. SEP Q1-Q5 scores were determined as the percentage of 'Yes' responses to each of the 5 questions out of all sexual attempts recorded during the time period. (NCT02224846)
Timeframe: Month 1, Month 3

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Mean)
Q2: successful penetration,Month 1Q2: successful penetration,Month 3Q3: successful intercourse,Month 1Q3: successful intercourse,Month 3Q4: satisfied with erection, Month 1Q4: satisfied with erection, Month 3Q5: satisfied with sexual experience,Month 1Q5: satisfied with sexual experience,Month 3
2.5 mg/5 mg Tadalafil81.388.241.255.724.839.920.435.7
5 mg Tadalafil86.791.749.560.135.543.531.139.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the IIEF-EF Domain Questionnaire Score of 5 mg Tadalafil Treatments

IIEF- EF is the sum of Questions 1-5 and 15 of the IIEF. Questions 1-5 are scored 0 (no sexual activity for Question 1, no sexual stimulation for Question 2 and did not attempt intercourse for Questions 3-5) to 5 (high erectile function) and Question 15 is scored 1 (very low confidence) to 5 (very high confidence), for a total score ranging from 1 to 30. Higher scores represent better erectile function. Least Squares (LS) mean of the change from baseline is from Mixed effect Model Repeat Measurement (MMRM) model. The model included covariates baseline + visit + pooled investigator + baseline*visit, where participant is a random effect. (NCT02224846)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6; Baseline, Month 12;Baseline, Month 18; Baseline, Month 24

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Month 6Month 12Month 18Month 24
2.5 mg/5 mg Tadalafil8.28.18.68.6
5 mg Tadalafil7.97.98.38.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Normal Erectile Functioning

Participants achieving a normal erectile functioning (defined as having an IIEF-EF Domain score of >=26) at Month 1 and Month 3. (NCT02224846)
Timeframe: Month 1, Month 3

,
InterventionPercentage of partcipants (Number)
Month 1Month 3
2.5 mg/5 mg Tadalafil22.231.6
5 mg Tadalafil30.937.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Normal Erectile Functioning of 5 mg Tadalafil Treatments

Participants achieving a normal erectile functioning (defined as having an IIEF-EF Domain score of >=26) at Month 6 and Month 12. (NCT02224846)
Timeframe: Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Month 6Month 12Month 18Month 24
2.5 mg/5 mg Tadalafil38.244.144.645.5
5 mg Tadalafil42.343.543.748.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function- Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) Domain Questionnaire Score

IIEF- EF is the sum of Questions 1-5 and 15 of the IIEF. Questions 1-5 are scored 0 (no sexual activity for Question 1, no sexual stimulation for Question 2 and did not attempt intercourse for Questions 3-5) to 5 (high erectile function) and Question 15 is scored 1 (very low confidence) to 5 (very high confidence), for a total score ranging from 1 to 30. Higher scores represent better erectile function. Least Squares (LS) mean of the change from baseline is from Mixed effect Model Repeat Measurement (MMRM) model. The model included covariates baseline + visit + pooled investigator + baseline*visit, where participant is a random effect. (NCT02224846)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1; Baseline, Month 3

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Month 1Month 3
2.5 mg/5 mg Tadalafil4.56.1
5 mg Tadalafil6.27.4

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve From Zero to Infinity (AUC[0-infinity]) of LY2623091

(NCT02300259)
Timeframe: Group 1 (Days 1 and 6) Group 4 (Days 1 and 4): Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 hours (hr) postdose; additionally for Group 1 (Day 6): 264, 288, 312, 336, 360 hr postdose

Interventionnanograms*hour/milliliter (ng*h/mL) (Geometric Mean)
LY2623091 (Group 1)2540
Itraconazole + LY2623091 (Group 1)5660
LY2623091 (Group 4)2390
Diltiazem + LY2623091 (Group 4)3360

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Maximum Drug Concentration (Cmax) of LY2623091

(NCT02300259)
Timeframe: Group 1 (Days 1 and 6) Group 4 (Days 1 and 4): Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 hours (hr) postdose; additionally for Group 1 (Day 6): 264, 288, 312, 336, 360 hr postdose

Interventionnanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
LY2623091 (Group 1)61.9
Itraconazole + LY2623091 (Group 1)66.9
LY2623091 (Group 4)61.8
Diltiazem + LY2623091 (Group 4)64.2

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to Time T, Where T is the Last Time Point With a Measurable Concentration (AUC[0-tlast]) of Simvastatin and Simvastatin Acid

(NCT02300259)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 12: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 hours postdose

,
Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
SimvastatinSimvastatin Acid
LY2623091 + Simvastatin23.06.87
Simvastatin (Group 2)16.55.42

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve From Zero to Infinity (AUC[0-infinity]) of Simvastatin and Simvastatin Acid

(NCT02300259)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 12: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 hours postdose

,
Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
SimvastatinSimvastatin Acid
LY2623091 + Simvastatin24.18.88
Simvastatin (Group 2)17.47.15

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to Time T, Where T is the Last Time Point With a Measurable Concentration (AUC[0-tlast]) of LY2623091

(NCT02300259)
Timeframe: Group 1 (Days 1 and 6) Group 4 (Days 1 and 4): Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 192, 216, 240 hours (hr) postdose; additionally for Group 1 (Day 6): 264, 288, 312, 336, 360 hr postdose

Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
LY2623091 (Group 1)2480
Itraconazole + LY2623091 (Group 1)5240
LY2623091 (Group 4)2340
Diltiazem + LY2623091 (Group 4)3130

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Maximum Drug Concentration (Cmax) of Simvastatin and Simvastatin Acid

(NCT02300259)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 12: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 hours postdose

,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
SimvastatinSimvastatin Acid
LY2623091 + Simvastatin (Group 2)9.890.877
Simvastatin (Group 2)7.780.720

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With PGI-I (Drug Attributes Questionnaire) on 8 Symptoms for BPH-Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Improvement

PGI-I (Drug Attributes Questionnaire [DRAQ]) on 8 Symptoms for BPH-Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.The DRAQ includes the following urinary symptoms: 1. Difficulty to void; 2. Frequent nighttime voiding; 3. Feeling of incomplete emptying; 4. Frequent daytime voiding; 5. Urinary urgency; 6. Taking a long time to urinate; 7. Need abdominal pressure to void; 8. Dribbling, leakage, and/or accidents. Each urinary symptom in the DRAQ will be evaluated by a participant using the PGI-I (discrete variables with seven categories) at the end of each treatment period, compared with how the symptom was before the participant's began taking medication in this study. The percentage of participants who reported a PGI-I (Drug Attributes Questionnaire) score of 1 to 3 are presented in the table below. (NCT02431754)
Timeframe: Week 8

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Difficulty to void -Frequent nighttime voidingFeeling of incomplete emptyingFrequent daytime voidingUrinary urgencyTaking a long time to urinateNeed abdominal pressure to voidDribbling, leakage, and/or accidents
Placebo37.942.934.837.931.732.933.527.3
Tadalafil44.948.548.542.537.142.533.526.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline on the IPSS Quality of Life Score (IPSS QoL )

"IPSS QoL assess participant response to the following question: If you were to spend the rest of your life with your urinary condition just the way it is now, how would you feel about that?. Response options are Delighted (0), Pleased (1); Mostly satisfied (2); mixed about equally satisfied and dissatisfied (3); Mostly dissatisfied (4); Unhappy (5); Terrible (6), with a total ranging from 0 to 6 with higher numerical score representing worse Quality of Life from BPH symptom." (NCT02431754)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tadalafil-0.4
Placebo-0.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline on the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Total Score

IPSS Total Score is the sum of Questions 1 through 7 of the IPSS questionnaire. Each question was scored from 0 (none/no symptoms) to 5 (frequent symptoms) for an IPSS Total Score ranging from 0 to 35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. (NCT02431754)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tadalafil-2.5
Placebo-1.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline on the IPSS Storage (Irritative) Subscore

IPSS Storage (Irritative) subscore was the sum of Questions 2, 4 and 7 of the IPSS questionnaire. Scores ranged from 0 (no irritative symptoms) to 5 (frequent irritative symptoms), with total subscore of the 3 questions for irritative subscore ranging from 0 to 15. Higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. (NCT02431754)
Timeframe: Baseline,Week 8

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tadalafil-0.6
Placebo-0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline on the IPSS Voiding (Obstructive) Subscore

IPSS voiding (obstructive) subscore is the sum of Questions 1, 3, 5 and 6 of the IPSS questionnaire. Scores ranged from 0 (no obstructive symptoms) to 5 (frequent obstructive symptoms), with total subscore of the 4 questions of the obstructive score ranging from 0 to 20. Higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. (NCT02431754)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tadalafil-2.0
Placebo-1.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)

"The PGI I is a participant rated instrument that measures the improvement or worsening of the subject's symptoms based on a 7 point scale. A score of 1 indicates that the subject feels his symptoms are very much better. A score of 4 indicates that the subjects feels no change in his symptoms and a score of 7 indicates that the subject feels his symptoms are very much worse. The percentage of participants who reported a PGI-I score of 1 to 3 are presented in the table below." (NCT02431754)
Timeframe: Week 8

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tadalafil61.1
Placebo53.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Preferring Combination Therapy Over Alpha Blocker Alone on the Treatment Preference Questionnaire (TPQ)

TPQ was used to investigate participant's preference between alpha1 blocker monotherapy and combination therapy with alpha1 blocker plus tadalafil. At the end of Treatment Period 2 (or discontinuation), participants were asked to choose a preferred treatment between the two treatments given in Treatment Period 1 and Treatment Period 2. (NCT02431754)
Timeframe: Week 20

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Prefer therapy tadalafil + a1 blockerPrefer therapy placebo + a1 blocker
Placebo/Tadalafil68.331.7
Tadalafil/Placebo44.056.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Absence of Worsening From Baseline to Week 26 in World Health Organization (WHO) Functional Class (FC)

WHO FC is a classification graded from Class I to IV which reflects disease severity based on symptoms. Worsening was defined as death or hospitalization due to PAH. Class I: No limitation of activity; Class II: slight limitation with ordinary activities; Class III: may not have symptoms at rest but greatly limited activities; Class IV: symptoms at rest and inability to carry out any physical activity without symptoms. Missing values were imputed using a LOCF approach. (NCT02558231)
Timeframe: Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Triple Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Selexipag)99.2
Double Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Placebo)97.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Disease Progression Event

Number of participants with disease progression event were reported. Disease progression event as adjudicated by the CEC, defined as any of the following: a. Death (all causes; adjudicated for PAH relationship); b. Hospitalization for worsening PAH; c. Initiation of prostacyclin, a prostacyclin analog, or a prostacyclin receptor agonist for worsening PAH; d. Clinical worsening defined as a post-baseline decrease in 6MWD by more than (>) 15 percent (%) from the highest 6MWD obtained at or after baseline, accompanied by WHO FC III or IV (both conditions confirmed at two consecutive post-baseline visits separated by 1-21 days). (NCT02558231)
Timeframe: Week 26, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Month 30, and End of Analysis Period (up to 40 months)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Week 26Month 12Month 18Month 24Month 30End of Analysis Period (up to 40 months)
Double Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Placebo)132023252727
Triple Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Selexipag)81315151616

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in 6-minute Walk Distance (6MWD)

The change from baseline to Week 26 in 6MWD was calculated as Week 26 minus baseline. The test measures the distance an individual is able to walk over a total of six minutes on a hard, flat surface. The goal is for the individual to walk as far as possible in six minutes. Missing values were imputed using a LOCF approach. (NCT02558231)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmeter (Least Squares Mean)
Triple Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Selexipag)54.96
Double Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Placebo)56.39

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Cardiac Index

Change from baseline to Week 26 in cardiac index was measured. Cardiac index is the amount of blood pumped by the heart, per minute, per meter square of body surface area. Re-calculated values were used for analysis and missing values were imputed using a LOCF approach. (NCT02558231)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionliters per minute per meter square (Least Squares Mean)
Triple Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Selexipag)0.97
Double Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Placebo)0.84

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Mean Pulmonary Arterial Pressure (mPAP)

Change from baseline to Week 26 in mean Pulmonary Arterial Pressure (mPAP) was measured. The pulmonary artery pressure is a measure of the blood pressure found in the main pulmonary artery. Missing values were imputed using a LOCF approach. (NCT02558231)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Least Squares Mean)
Triple Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Selexipag)-12.92
Double Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Placebo)-12.20

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Mean Right Atrial Pressure (mRAP)

Change from baseline to Week 26 in mean Right Atrial Pressure (mRAP) was measured. Missing values were imputed using a LOCF approach. (NCT02558231)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Triple Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Selexipag)-1.78
Double Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Placebo)-1.69

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) Levels

The change from baseline to Week 26 in NT-proBNP was expressed as the ratio of Week 26 to baseline NT-proBNP (Week 26 divided by baseline). A geometric least square mean ratio of Week 26 to baseline NT-proBNP <1 corresponds to a reduction in NT-proBNP from baseline. Missing values were imputed using a LOCF approach. (NCT02558231)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionratio (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Triple Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Selexipag)0.26
Double Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Placebo)0.25

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR)

Change from baseline to Week 26 in PVR was expressed as the ratio of Week 26 to baseline PVR value (Week 26 divided by baseline) using re-calculated PVR. PVR was determined by right heart catheterization (RHC). A geometric least square mean ratio of Week 26 to baseline PVR less than (<) 1 corresponds to a reduction in PVR from baseline. Missing values were imputed using a last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach. (NCT02558231)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionratio (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Triple Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Selexipag)0.46
Double Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Placebo)0.48

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Total Pulmonary Resistance

Change from baseline to Week 26 in total pulmonary resistance was measured. Total pulmonary resistance was calculated as mPAP/CO*80, where CO is cardiac output. Re-calculated values were used for analysis and missing values were imputed using a LOCF approach. (NCT02558231)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventiondynes*second per centimeter^5 (Least Squares Mean)
Triple Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Selexipag)-511.88
Double Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Placebo)-514.28

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Venous Oxygen Saturation (%)

Change from baseline to Week 26 in venous oxygen saturation was measured. Missing values were imputed using a LOCF approach. (NCT02558231)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionpercentage of oxygen saturation (Least Squares Mean)
Triple Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Selexipag)5.59
Double Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Placebo)6.79

[back to top]

Body Fat

The body fat will be measured at baseline and Day 28 by Electrical bioimpedance in % (NCT02595684)
Timeframe: Body fat at Day 28

Interventionpercentage of fat (Mean)
Tadalafil33.7
Placebo33.1

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve (AUC) Glucose

Area under the curve of glucose measured at baseline and Day 28. The area under the curve (AUC) of glucose, (0.5 * glucose (G) 0´ + (G 30´+G 60´ + G 90´) + 0.5 * G 120´) * 30; has been widely used for calculating the glycemic index and for evaluating the efficacy of medications for postprandial hyperglycemia. (NCT02595684)
Timeframe: AUC at Day 28

Interventionmmol*h/L (Mean)
Tadalafil503
Placebo522

[back to top]

Diastolic Blood Pressure

(NCT02595684)
Timeframe: Diastolic Blood Pressure at Day 28

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Tadalafil77
Placebo73

[back to top]

Body Mass Index

The Body Mass Index will be measured at baseline and Day 28 by Quetelet Index Formula. (NCT02595684)
Timeframe: Body Mass Index at Day 28

Interventionkg/m^2 (Mean)
Tadalafil33.7
Placebo33.1

[back to top]

Body Weight

The body weight will be measured at baseline and Day 28 by Electrical bioimpedance. (NCT02595684)
Timeframe: Body Weight at Day 28

Interventionkg (Mean)
Tadalafil99.1
Placebo98.2

[back to top]

Fasting Glucose

Fasting glucose will be evaluated at baseline and Day 28 with enzymatic-colorimetric. (NCT02595684)
Timeframe: Fasting glucose at Day 28

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Tadalafil4.8
Placebo5.0

[back to top]

First Phase of Insulin Secretion

"First phase of insulin secretion will be calculated at baseline and Day 28 with Stumvoll Index.~Human studies support the critical physiologic role of the first-phase of insulin secretion in the maintenance of postmeal glucose homeostasis.~First phase of insulin secretion was estimated using the Stumvoll index (1283+ 1.829 x insulin 30' - 138.7 x glucose 30' + 3.772 x insulin 0'), the entered values reflect the first phase of insulin secretion" (NCT02595684)
Timeframe: First phase of insulin secretion at Day 28

Interventionindex (Mean)
Tadalafil1602
Placebo1194

[back to top]

High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-c)

High density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) levels will be evaluated at baseline and Day 28 with enzymatic-colorimetric techniques. (NCT02595684)
Timeframe: HDL-c levels at Day 28

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Tadalafil1.1
Placebo1.1

[back to top]

Insulin Sensitivity

"Insulin sensitivity will be calculated at baseline and Day 28 with Matsuda Index.~Matsuda Index value is used to indicate insulin resistance on diabetes. Insulin sensitivity was calculated with Matsuda index [10,000 / √glucose 0' x insulin 0') (mean glucose oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) x mean insulin OGTT)]. The entered values reflect the insulin sensitivity" (NCT02595684)
Timeframe: Insulin sensitivity at Day 28

Interventionindex (Mean)
Tadalafil4.8
Placebo4.9

[back to top]

Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-c)

Low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) levels will be evaluated at baseline and Day 28 with Friedewald formula. (NCT02595684)
Timeframe: LDL-c levels at Day 28

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Tadalafil2.3
Placebo2.2

[back to top]

Postprandial Glucose

Postprandial glucose will be evaluated at baseline and Day 28 after a oral glucose. tolerance test with enzymatic-colorimetric techniques. (NCT02595684)
Timeframe: Postprandial glucose at Day 28

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Tadalafil6.3
Placebo6.5

[back to top]

Systolic Blood Pressure

The systolic blood pressure was evaluated at baseline and Day 28 with a digital sphygmomanometer. (NCT02595684)
Timeframe: Systolic Blood Pressure at Day 28

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Tadalafil120
Placebo115

[back to top]

Total Cholesterol

Total cholesterol levels will be evaluated at baseline and Day 28 with enzymatic-colorimetric techniques. (NCT02595684)
Timeframe: Total cholesterol levels at Day 28

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Tadalafil4.4
Placebo4.3

[back to top]

Total Insulin Secretion

"Total insulin secretion will be calculated at baseline and Day 28 with Insulinogenic Index.~The insulinogenic index is a ratio that relates enhancement of circulating insulin to the magnitude of the corresponding glycemic stimulus.~Total insulin secretion was calculated with the insulinogenic index (ΔAUC insulin/ΔAUC glucose), the entered values reflect the total insulin secretion" (NCT02595684)
Timeframe: Total insulin secretion at Day 28

Interventionindex (Mean)
Tadalafil0.52
Placebo0.61

[back to top]

Triglycerides

Triglycerides levels will be evaluated at baseline and Day 28 with enzymatic-colorimetric techniques. (NCT02595684)
Timeframe: Triglycerides levels at Day 28

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Tadalafil2.3
Placebo2.4

[back to top]

Waist Circumference

Waist circumference was evaluated at baseline and at Day 28 with a flexible tape. (NCT02595684)
Timeframe: Waist circumference at Day 28

Interventioncm (Mean)
Tadalafil112
Placebo112

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve (AUC) Insulin

Area under the curve of insulin measured at baseline and Day 28. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) of insulin, (0.5 * Insulin (I) 0´ + (I 30´+I 60´ + I 90´) + 0.5 * I 120´) * 30; has been widely used for calculating the glycemic index and for evaluating the efficacy of medications for postprandial hyperinsulinemia. (NCT02595684)
Timeframe: AUC at Day 28

Interventionpmol*h/L (Mean)
Tadalafil291
Placebo262

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Values of PCI- Part 2

Blood samples of 2 mL, via a cannula for were collected from the participants for analysis of clinical chemistry parameters like glucose, calcium, albumin, sodium and potassium. It was collected at Day 2 (48 hour). The data for number of participants, with low and high values of PCI have been reported. Safety population was used for analysis. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Day 2

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Glucose, lowGlucose, highAlbumin, lowAlbumin, highCalcium, lowCalcium, highPotassium, lowPotassium, highSodium, lowSodium, high
Part 2, Treatment FG10000000000
Part 2, Treatment FG20000000000
Part 2, Treatment FG30000000000
Part 2, Treatment R0000000000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Urinalysis Results by Dipstick Method-Part 1

Urine samples were collected at Day -1 (Baseline) and 48 hour, from the participants for urinalysis, by standard dipstick method. The parameters analyzed were ketones, glucose, occult blood, and protein. The number of participants with parameters detected as trace-lysed, trace-intact, trace, 2+ and 1+ was reported. Safety Population was used for analysis. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Up to Day 2

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Ketone, trace-lysed, Day -1Ketone, trace-intact, Day -1Ketone, trace, Day -1Ketone, 2+, Day -1Ketone 1+, Day -1Ketone, trace-lysed, 48 hourKetone, trace-intact, 48 hourKetone, trace, 48 hourKetone, 2+, 48 hourKetone 1+, 48 hourGlucose, trace-lysed, Day -1Glucose, trace-Intact, Day -1Glucose, trace, Day -1Glucose, 2+, Day -1Glucose, 1+, Day -1Glucose, trace-lysed, 48 hourGlucose, trace-Intact, 48 hourGlucose, trace, 48 hourGlucose, 2+, 48 hourGlucose, 1+, 48 hourOccult blood, trace-lysed, Day -1Occult blood, trace-Intact, Day -1Occult blood, trace, Day -1Occult blood, 2+, Day -1Occult blood, 1+, Day -1Occult blood, trace-lysed, 48 hourOccult blood, trace-Intact, 48 hourOccult blood, trace, 48 hourOccult blood, 2+, 48 hourOccult blood, 1+, 48 hourProtein, trace-lysed, Day -1Protein, trace-Intact, Day -1Protein, trace, Day -1Protein, 2+, Day -1Protein, 1+, Day -1Protein, trace-lysed, 48 hourProtein, trace-Intact, 48 hourProtein, trace, 48 hourProtein, 2+, 48 hourProtein, 1+, 48 hour
Part 1, Treatment R0010000000000000000001001030000001000100
Part 1,Treatment F10020000000000000000000000100020010100000
Part 1,Treatment F20000000100000000000011001100010000000000
Part 1,Treatment F30000000000000000000000001020000000100000
Part 1,Treatment F40000000000000000000011000110000000100000

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Ambrisentan and Tadalafil in FDC (Ambrisentan 10 mg + Tadalafil 40 mg) and Montherapies (Ambrisentan 10 mg & Tadalafil 40 mg) - Part 1

Cmax is defined as the maximum (or peak) plasma concentration that the drug achieves, after the drug has been administered. Blood samples were collected at the indicated time points for analysis of ambrisentan and tadafil. The analysis was done under fasting condition post single dose. There is no formal hypotheses tested for Part 1 of the study. The analysis was performed on Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter population, which included all participants who provided PK parameter data. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

,,,,
InterventionNanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Ambrisentan, CmaxTadalafil, Cmax
Part 1, Treatment R755.37567.62
Part 1,Treatment F1766.29581.41
Part 1,Treatment F2685.33595.47
Part 1,Treatment F3738.49588.11
Part 1,Treatment F4722.57590.36

[back to top]

Cmax of Ambrisentan and Tadalafil in FDC (Ambrisentan 10 mg + Tadalafil 40 mg) and Montherapies (Ambrisentan 10 mg & Tadalafil 40 mg) - Part 2

Cmax is defined as the maximum (or peak) plasma concentration that the drug achieves, after the drug has been administered. Blood samples were collected at the indicated time-points, of Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose. The analysis was done under fasting condition post single dose. There is no formal hypotheses tested for Part 2 of the study. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

,,,
InterventionNanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Ambrisentan, (n=21,20,20,20)Tadalafil, (n=20,20,20,20)
Part 2, Treatment FG1720.79561.60
Part 2, Treatment FG2748.63550.78
Part 2, Treatment FG3726.15553.31
Part 2, Treatment R710.90537.80

[back to top]

Cmax for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil, Following Candidate FDC (Ambrisentan 10 mg + Tadalafil 40 mg) Relative to Reference Monotherapies Tested (Ambrisentan 10 mg & Tadalafil 40 mg), Under Fed and Fasted Conditions-Part 3A

Cmax is defined as the maximum (or peak) plasma concentration that the drug achieves, after the drug has been administered. Blood samples of 2.7 mL and 2 mL were collected for ambrisentan and tadafil respectively. The plasma samples for Part 3A, were collected at the time-points pre-dose, 0.5 hours, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose. The analysis was done under fed and fasting condition post single dose. PK parameter population was used. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

,,,
InterventionNanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Ambrisentan, CmaxTadalafil, Cmax
Part 3A,Treatment R1515.61533.67
Part 3A,Treatment R2728.32520.62
Part 3A,Treatment X1550.02525.10
Part 3A,Treatment X2756.60508.72

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Vital- Temperature, Part 2

Vital signs were measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest and were assessed for temperature. Change from Baseline, was defined as value at post-Baseline visit minus the Baseline value. Baseline, was defined as Day 1. Safety population included all the participants enrolled into the study who received atleast one dose of investigational product. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Baseline and Up to Day 3

,,,
InterventionDegree celsius (Mean)
Temperature, 0.5 hourTemperature, 1 hourTemperature, 2 hourTemperature, 4 hourTemperature, 8 hourTemperature, 12 hourTemperature, 24 hourTemperature, 48 hourTemperature, 72 hour
Part 2, Treatment FG1-0.02-0.11-0.17-0.06-0.080.04-0.02-0.06-0.13
Part 2, Treatment FG2-0.05-0.01-0.030.030.050.090.240.030.05
Part 2, Treatment FG3-0.14-0.04-0.23-0.190.030.100.07-0.110.06
Part 2, Treatment R-0.07-0.13-0.12-0.010.020.20-0.06-0.06-0.09

[back to top]

Cmax for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil, FDCs (Ambrisentan 5 mg + Tadalafil 40 mg) Relative to Reference Monotherapies Tested (Ambrisentan 5 mg & Tadalafil 40 mg) Under Fasted Conditions-3B

Cmax is defined as the maximum (or peak) plasma concentration that the drug achieves, after the drug has been administered. Blood samples of 2.7 mL and 2 mL were collected for ambrisentan and tadafil respectively. The plasma samples for Part 3B, were collected at the time-points pre-dose, 0.5 hours, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose. The analysis was done under fasting condition post single dose. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

,
InterventionNanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Ambrisentan, CmaxTadalafil, Cmax
Part 3B,Treatment R3380.47511.80
Part 3B,Treatment Y1375.87488.36

[back to top]

Cmax for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil, FDCs (Ambrisentan 5 mg + Tadalafil 20 mg) Relative to Reference Monotherapies Tested (Ambrisentan 5 mg & Tadalafil 20 mg) Under Fasted Conditions-3B

Cmax is defined as the maximum (or peak) plasma concentration that the drug achieves, after the drug has been administered. Blood samples of 2.7 mL and 2 mL were collected for ambrisentan and tadafil respectively. The plasma samples for Part 3B, were collected at the time-points pre-dose, 0.5 hours, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose. The analysis was done under fasting condition post single dose. PK parameter population was used. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

,
InterventionNanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Ambrisentan, CmaxTadalafil, Cmax
Part 3B,Treatment R4358.89303.74
Part 3B,Treatment Y2405.89340.63

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Vital- Temperature, Part 3B

Vital signs were measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest and were assessed for temperature. Change from Baseline, was defined as value at post-Baseline visit minus the Baseline value. Baseline, was defined as Day 1. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Baseline and Up to Day 3

,,,
InterventionDegree Celsius (Mean)
Temperature, 0.5 hour (n=30,31,32,30)Temperature, 1 hour (n=30,31,32,30)Temperature, 2 hour (n=29,31,32,30)Temperature, 4 hour(n=30,31,32,30)Temperature, 8 hour (n=30,31,32,30)Temperature, 12 hour (n=30,31,32,30)Temperature, 24 hour (n=30,31,32,30)Temperature, 48 hour (n=30,31,32,30)Temperature, 72 hour (n=30,31,31,30)
Part 3B,Treatment R30.110.100.090.070.230.320.230.160.14
Part 3B,Treatment R40.050.090.040.090.170.450.190.220.08
Part 3B,Treatment Y10.060.060.050.100.290.310.340.190.33
Part 3B,Treatment Y20.130.070.070.050.220.390.120.130.26

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Vital- Temperature, Part 3A

Vital signs were measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest and were assessed for temperature. Change from Baseline, was defined as value at post-Baseline visit minus the Baseline value. Baseline, was defined as Day 1. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Baseline and Up to Day 3

,,,
InterventionDegree Celsius (Mean)
Temperature, 0.5 hourTemperature, 1 hourTemperature, 2 hourTemperature, 4 hourTemperature, 8 hourTemperature, 12 hourTemperature, 24 hourTemperature, 48 hourTemperature, 72 hour
Part 3A,Treatment R10.150.120.100.160.150.090.060.120.10
Part 3A,Treatment R20.120.040.07-0.010.150.270.160.320.18
Part 3A,Treatment X10.210.180.260.180.210.220.290.340.18
Part 3A,Treatment X20.010.070.050.150.120.270.250.280.20

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Vital- Temperature, Part 1

Vital signs were measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest and were assessed for temperature. Change from Baseline, was defined as value at post-Baseline visit minus the Baseline value. Baseline, was defined as Day 1. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Baseline and Up to Day 3

,,,,
InterventionDegree celsius (Mean)
Temperature, 0.5 hourTemperature, 1 hourTemperature, 2 hourTemperature, 4 hourTemperature, 8 hourTemperature, 12 hourTemperature, 24 hourTemperature, 48 hourTemperature, 72 hour
Part 1, Treatment R-0.03-0.12-0.14-0.100.020.020.070.160.02
Part 1,Treatment F1-0.20-0.15-0.14-0.28-0.040.09-0.04-0.010.12
Part 1,Treatment F2-0.05-0.09-0.16-0.080.030.160.030.180.03
Part 1,Treatment F3-0.12-0.07-0.23-0.17-0.08-0.030.140.01-0.02
Part 1,Treatment F4-0.18-0.06-0.04-0.030.080.080.130.050.10

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Vital- Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Part 1

Vital signs were measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest and were assessed for SBP and DBP. Change from Baseline, was defined as value at post-Baseline visit minus the Baseline value. Baseline, was defined as Day 1. Safety population included all the participants enrolled into the study who received atleast one dose of investigational product. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Baseline and Up to Day 3

,,,,
InterventionMilliliters of Mercury (Mean)
DBP, 0.5 hourDBP, 1 hourDBP, 2 hourDBP, 4 hourDBP, 8 hourDBP, 12 hourDBP, 24 hourDBP, 48 hourDBP, 72 hourSBP, 0.5 hourSBP, 1 hourSBP, 2 hourSBP, 4 hourSBP, 8 hourSBP, 12 hourSBP, 24 hourSBP, 48 hourSBP, 72 hour
Part 1, Treatment R-2.79-4.40-5.83-5.21-7.83-5.60-3.55-0.74-0.15-3.36-3.74-5.40-5.36-8.40-3.60-1.79-0.313.00
Part 1,Treatment F1-3.33-5.33-5.24-4.29-9.10-4.76-5.86-2.380.76-1.10-2.76-6.05-3.90-6.100.14-1.481.526.95
Part 1,Treatment F2-3.54-4.72-5.28-5.72-6.67-6.16-4.50-1.02-0.67-3.22-4.13-5.39-7.30-5.48-0.84-3.172.393.52
Part 1,Treatment F3-4.20-5.63-5.98-6.07-6.50-5.72-4.07-4.020.20-1.59-2.54-3.11-5.50-4.020.540.022.503.37
Part 1,Treatment F4-2.86-5.73-7.27-7.09-9.68-8.18-5.59-4.18-1.73-3.68-6.00-6.91-6.59-10.55-4.77-3.82-0.644.18

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Vital- SBP and DBP, Part 3B

Vital signs were measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest and were assessed for SBP and DBP. Change from Baseline, was defined as value at post-Baseline visit minus the Baseline value. Baseline, was defined as Day 1. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Baseline and Up to Day 3

,,,
InterventionMilliliters of Mercury (Mean)
DBP, 0.5 hourDBP, 1 hourDBP, 2 hourDBP, 4 hourDBP, 8 hourDBP, 12 hourDBP, 24 hourDBP, 48 hourDBP, 72 hourSBP, 0.5 hourSBP, 1 hourSBP, 2 hourSBP, 4 hourSBP, 8 hourSBP, 12 hourSBP, 24 hourSBP, 48 hourSBP, 72 hour
Part 3B,Treatment R3-2.53-3.41-5.00-6.56-7.81-5.88-3.31-0.41-0.470.30-0.20-1.98-3.14-3.050.450.363.452.76
Part 3B,Treatment R4-1.53-3.73-5.70-6.80-7.23-7.57-4.90-1.50-0.930.430.17-1.10-5.60-5.03-1.03-1.771.871.70
Part 3B,Treatment Y1-1.42-3.92-6.52-5.02-4.38-3.38-1.62-0.650.850.77-1.27-0.57-4.17-2.872.17-0.135.332.80
Part 3B,Treatment Y2-2.15-3.31-5.92-6.85-6.56-5.15-4.05-0.400.31-0.920.11-4.34-3.92-2.950.11-2.560.501.76

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Vital- SBP and DBP, Part 3A

Vital signs were measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest and were assessed for SBP, DBP. Change from Baseline, was defined as value at post-Baseline visit minus the Baseline value. Baseline, was defined as Day 1. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Baseline and Up to Day 3

,,,
InterventionMilliliters of Mercury (Mean)
DBP, 0.5 hourDBP, 1 hourDBP, 2 hourDBP, 4 hourDBP, 8 hourDBP, 12 hourDBP, 24 hourDBP, 48 hourDBP, 72 hourSBP, 0.5 hourSBP, 1 hourSBP, 2 hourSBP, 4 hourSBP, 8 hourSBP, 12 hourSBP, 24 hourSBP, 48 hourSBP, 72 hour
Part 3A,Treatment R1-3.02-5.86-6.89-10.30-6.45-7.67-4.77-1.89-1.524.552.86-0.08-4.30-5.23-1.05-2.481.363.86
Part 3A,Treatment R2-1.45-5.36-6.05-6.27-8.20-7.36-5.89-1.770.800.17-1.95-3.95-4.77-5.27-1.58-2.080.803.52
Part 3A,Treatment X1-3.47-6.69-8.97-8.75-8.41-7.25-7.25-2.41-1.565.752.880.28-1.72-5.06-0.03-0.782.721.81
Part 3A,Treatment X2-0.36-4.73-6.03-6.24-7.76-6.18-4.27-0.791.24-0.32-4.14-2.05-4.35-5.32-0.47-1.081.683.14

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Vital Signs-Respiratory Rate, Part 3A

Vital signs were measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest and were assessed for Respiratory rate. Change from Baseline, was defined as value at post-Baseline visit minus the Baseline value. Baseline, was defined as Day 1. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Baseline and Up to Day 3

,,,
InterventionBreaths per minute (Mean)
Respiratory rate, 0.5 hourRespiratory rate, 1 hourRespiratory rate, 2 hourRespiratory rate, 4 hourRespiratory rate, 8 hourRespiratory rate, 12 hourRespiratory rate, 24 hourRespiratory rate, 48 hourRespiratory rate, 72 hour
Part 3A,Treatment R11.50.80.61.10.50.60.20.60.8
Part 3A,Treatment R2-0.2-0.70.20.1-0.30.4-1.3-0.70.1
Part 3A,Treatment X10.40.90.70.60.10.9-0.50.00.6
Part 3A,Treatment X20.80.20.70.20.10.50.1-0.10.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Vital Signs-Respiratory Rate, Part 3-B

Vital signs were measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest and were assessed for Respiratory rate. Change from Baseline, was defined as value at post-Baseline visit minus the Baseline value. Baseline, was defined as Day 1. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Baseline and Up to Day 3

,,,
InterventionBreaths per minute (Mean)
Respiratory rate, 0.5 hour (n=30,31,32,30)Respiratory rate, 1 hour (n=30,31,32,30)Respiratory rate, 2 hour (n=30,31,32,30)Respiratory rate, 4 hour (n=30,31,32,30)Respiratory rate, 8 hour(n=30,31,32,30)Respiratory rate, 12 hour (n=30,31,32,30)Respiratory rate, 24 hour(n=30,31,32,30)Respiratory rate, 48 hour(n=30,31,32,30)Respiratory rate, 72 hour (n=30,31,31,30)
Part 3B,Treatment R3-0.8-0.1-0.1-0.40.00.2-0.6-0.10.2
Part 3B,Treatment R40.80.20.60.50.51.10.11.20.6
Part 3B,Treatment Y1-0.3-0.6-0.20.30.4-0.8-1.3-0.8-0.1
Part 3B,Treatment Y20.4-0.70.60.10.9-0.3-0.7-0.0-0.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Vital Signs-Respiratory Rate, Part 2

Vital signs were measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest and were assessed for Respiratory rate. Change from Baseline, was defined as value at post-Baseline visit minus the Baseline value. Baseline, was defined as Day 1. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Baseline and Up to Day 3

,,,
InterventionBreaths per minute (Mean)
Respiratory rate, 0.5 hourRespiratory rate, 1 hourRespiratory rate, 2 hourRespiratory rate, 4 hourRespiratory rate, 8 hourRespiratory rate, 12 hourRespiratory rate, 24 hourRespiratory rate, 48 hourRespiratory rate, 72 hour
Part 2, Treatment FG1-0.7-0.4-1.2-0.10.50.2-0.3-0.20.6
Part 2, Treatment FG20.30.30.4-0.10.40.81.30.70.6
Part 2, Treatment FG3-1.1-0.7-1.1-1.0-0.5-0.50.4-0.60.6
Part 2, Treatment R0.7-0.9-0.6-0.10.10.8-0.1-0.50.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Vital Signs-Respiratory Rate, Part 1

Vital signs were measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest and were assessed for Respiratory rate. Change from Baseline, was defined as value at post-Baseline visit minus the Baseline value. Baseline, was defined as Day 1. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Baseline and Up to Day 3

,,,,
InterventionBreaths per minute (Mean)
Respiratory rate, 0.5 hourRespiratory rate, 1 hourRespiratory rate, 2 hourRespiratory rate, 4 hourRespiratory rate, 8 hourRespiratory rate, 12 hourRespiratory rate, 24 hourRespiratory rate, 48 hourRespiratory rate, 72 hour
Part 1, Treatment R1.10.60.50.40.61.71.00.30.8
Part 1,Treatment F1-0.5-0.5-0.0-1.00.10.5-0.50.2-0.8
Part 1,Treatment F2-0.7-1.0-1.0-0.80.20.4-0.7-0.6-0.1
Part 1,Treatment F3-0.10.0-0.2-0.50.00.3-0.40.40.7
Part 1,Treatment F40.30.60.40.20.60.9-0.1-0.01.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Vital Signs-Heart Rate, Part 3B

Vital signs were measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest and were assessed for HR. Change from Baseline, was defined as value at post-Baseline visit minus the Baseline value. Baseline, was defined as Day 1. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Baseline and Up to Day 3

,,,
InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
HR, 0.5 hourHR, 1 hourHR, 2 hourHR, 4 hourHR, 8 hourHR, 12 hourHR, 24 hourHR, 48 hourHR, 72 hour
Part 3B,Treatment R32.615.705.674.957.2313.897.778.087.37
Part 3B,Treatment R42.785.485.586.228.7816.627.7210.159.62
Part 3B,Treatment Y13.056.056.084.859.6515.858.029.7210.78
Part 3B,Treatment Y23.504.923.763.697.3415.506.928.189.18

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Vital Signs-Heart Rate, Part 3A

Vital signs were measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest and were assessed for Heart rate. Change from Baseline, was defined as value at post-Baseline visit minus the Baseline value. Baseline, was defined as Day 1. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Baseline and Up to Day 3

,,,
InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
HR, 0.5 hourHR, 1 hourHR, 2 hourHR, 4 hourHR, 8 hourHR, 12 hourHR, 24 hourHR, 48 hourHR, 72 hour
Part 3A,Treatment R110.6612.9711.4110.9110.1614.387.009.479.59
Part 3A,Treatment R22.814.664.164.448.5616.387.288.0310.03
Part 3A,Treatment X18.2810.2811.0610.169.0615.288.728.509.19
Part 3A,Treatment X22.645.524.615.0610.7915.918.739.4510.91

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Vital Signs-Heart Rate, Part 2

Vital signs were measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest and were assessed for Heart rate. Change from Baseline, was defined as value at post-Baseline visit minus the Baseline value. Baseline, was defined as Day 1. Safety population included all the participants enrolled into the study who received atleast one dose of investigational product. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Baseline and Up to Day 3

,,,
InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
HR, 0.5 hourHR, 1 hourHR, 2 hourHR, 4 hourHR, 8 hourHR, 12 hourHR, 24 hourHR, 48 hourHR, 72 hour
Part 2, Treatment FG12.853.853.755.458.3014.808.805.707.90
Part 2, Treatment FG21.955.102.753.206.5515.508.005.107.80
Part 2, Treatment FG32.205.356.456.008.3016.458.705.909.30
Part 2, Treatment R1.453.123.213.369.3617.216.746.799.40

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Vital Signs-Heart Rate, Part 1

Vital signs were measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest and were assessed for Heart rate. Change from Baseline, was defined as value at post-Baseline visit minus the Baseline value. Baseline, was defined as Day 1. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Baseline and Up to Day 3

,,,,
InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
HR, 0.5 hourHR, 1 hourHR, 2 hourHR, 4 hourHR, 8 hourHR, 12 hourHR, 24 hourHR, 48 hourHR, 72 hour
Part 1, Treatment R3.744.172.832.127.5510.836.747.695.03
Part 1,Treatment F12.983.793.693.268.2610.406.179.216.21
Part 1,Treatment F22.894.114.413.637.9312.757.028.677.54
Part 1,Treatment F31.132.481.911.527.1710.486.527.576.57
Part 1,Treatment F42.983.302.483.166.1111.115.616.485.57

[back to top]

AUC From Time of Dose to Last Measurable Concentration (AUC [0-t]), in FDC, (Ambrisentan 10 mg + Tadalafil 40 mg) Relative to Reference Monotherapies Tested (Ambrisentan 10 mg & Tadalafil 40 mg), Under Fasting- Part 1

AUC (0-t), was defined as, the AUC measured from the time of dose to the last measurable concentration. Blood samples of 2.7 mL and 2 mL, were collected for ambrisentan and tadafil respectively. The plasma samples at Part 1, were collected at the time-points pre-dose, 0.5 hours, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours. The analysis was done under fasting condition post single dose. The PK Parameter Population was used for analysis. There is no formal hypotheses tested for Part 1 of the study. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

,,,,
InterventionHour*nanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Ambrisentan, (AUC 0- t)Tadalafil, (AUC 0- t)
Part 1, Treatment R5605.5812805.01
Part 1,Treatment F15418.0312469.86
Part 1,Treatment F25434.8813307.95
Part 1,Treatment F35655.7513376.86
Part 1,Treatment F45858.1813238.89

[back to top]

AUC (0-t) for FDC, (Ambrisentan 10 mg + Tadalafil 40 mg) Relative to Reference Monotherapies Tested (Ambrisentan 10 mg & Tadalafil 40 mg), Under Fasting- Part 2

AUC (0-t), was defined as, the AUC measured from the time of dose to the last measurable concentration. Blood samples of 2.7 mL and 2 mL, were collected for ambrisentan and tadafil respectively. The plasma samples for Part 2, were collected at the time-points pre-dose, 0.5 hours, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours. The analysis was done under fasting condition post single dose. PK parameter Population was used for analysis. There is no formal hypotheses tested for Part 2 of the study. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

,,,
InterventionHour*nanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Ambrisentan, (n=21,20,20,20)Tadalafil, (n=20,20,20,20)
Part 2, Treatment FG16016.6213149.19
Part 2, Treatment FG26051.8313305.50
Part 2, Treatment FG36015.1113275.08
Part 2, Treatment R5893.7412832.91

[back to top]

AUC (0-t) for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil, Following Candidate FDC (Ambrisentan 10 mg + Tadalafil 40 mg) Relative to Reference Monotherapies Tested (Ambrisentan 10 mg & Tadalafil 40 mg), Under Fed and Fasted Conditions-Part 3A

AUC (0-t), was defined as, the AUC measured from the time of dose to the last measurable concentration. Blood samples of 2.7 mL and 2 mL, were collected for ambrisentan and tadafil respectively. The plasma samples for Part 3A, were collected at the time-points pre-dose, 0.5 hours, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose. The analysis was done under fed and fasting condition post single dose. PK parameter population was used. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

,,,
InterventionHour*nanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Ambrisentan, AUC (0-t)Tadalafil, AUC (0-t)
Part 3A,Treatment R15766.7114946.32
Part 3A,Treatment R26012.5113114.00
Part 3A,Treatment X15926.8714366.73
Part 3A,Treatment X26090.7413320.79

[back to top]

AUC (0-t) for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil, FDCs (Ambrisentan 5 mg + Tadalafil 40 mg) Relative to Reference Monotherapies Tested (Ambrisentan 5 mg & Tadalafil 40 mg) Under Fasted Conditions-3B

AUC (0-t), was defined as, the AUC measured from the time of dose to the last measurable concentration. Blood samples of 2.7 mL and 2 mL, were collected for ambrisentan and tadafil respectively. The plasma samples for Part 3B, were collected at the time-points pre-dose, 0.5 hours, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose. The analysis was done under fasting condition post single dose. PK parameter population was used for analysis. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

,
InterventionHour*nanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Ambrisentan, AUC (0-t)Tadalafil, AUC (0-t)
Part 3B,Treatment R33190.5113325.63
Part 3B,Treatment Y13297.1613119.89

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Vital- SBP and DBP, Part 2

Vital signs were measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest and were assessed for SBP and DBP. Change from Baseline, was defined as value at post-Baseline visit minus the Baseline value. Baseline, was defined as Day 1. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Baseline and Up to Day 3

,,,
InterventionMilliliters of Mercury (Mean)
DBP, 0.5 hourDBP, 1 hourDBP, 2 hourDBP, 4 hourDBP, 8 hourDBP, 12 hourDBP, 24 hourDBP, 48 hourDBP, 72 hourSBP, 0.5 hourSBP, 1 hourSBP, 2 hourSBP, 4 hourSBP, 8 hourSBP, 12 hourSBP, 24 hourSBP, 48 hourSBP, 72 hour
Part 2, Treatment FG10.28-4.23-4.98-3.53-2.58-3.18-1.032.483.231.63-3.93-2.48-2.13-3.984.38-0.684.785.13
Part 2, Treatment FG2-0.25-4.55-5.85-3.90-5.15-2.25-2.001.352.052.90-2.05-1.45-2.45-2.352.00-0.300.855.00
Part 2, Treatment FG3-1.00-4.35-7.05-5.10-5.65-4.35-5.251.401.50-0.33-1.98-7.33-5.58-6.380.83-1.682.083.48
Part 2, Treatment R-2.29-4.71-5.67-4.10-4.43-3.76-3.00-3.290.95-1.57-4.43-5.52-3.05-5.43-0.05-2.95-2.004.14

[back to top]

AUC (0-inf) for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil, Following Candidate FDC (Ambrisentan 10 mg + Tadalafil 40 mg) Relative to Reference Monotherapies Tested (Ambrisentan 10 mg & Tadalafil 40 mg), Under Fed and Fasted Conditions-3A

AUC (0- inf), is defined as area under the concentration-time curve of the analyte in plasma over the time interval from 0 extrapolated to infinity for ambrisentan and tadafil. Blood samples of 2.7 mL and 2 mL were collected for ambrisentan and tadafil respectively. The plasma samples for Part 3A, were collected at the time-points pre-dose, 0.5 hours, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours post-dose. The analysis, was done under fed and fasting conditions post single dose. PK parameter population was used. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

,,,
InterventionHour*nanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Ambrisentan, AUC (0-inf)Tadalafil, AUC (0-inf)
Part 3A,Treatment R15898.7216596.18
Part 3A,Treatment R26155.6014612.84
Part 3A,Treatment X16075.5116086.66
Part 3A,Treatment X26231.4814856.32

[back to top]

AUC (0-inf) for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil, FDCs (Ambrisentan 5 mg + Tadalafil 40 mg) Relative to Reference Monotherapies Tested (Ambrisentan 5 mg & Tadalafil 40 mg) Under Fasted Conditions-3B

AUC (0- inf), is defined as area under the concentration-time curve of the analyte in plasma over the time interval from 0 extrapolated to infinity for ambrisentan and tadafil. Blood samples of 2.7 mL and 2 mL were collected for ambrisentan and tadafil respectively. The plasma samples for Part 3B, were collected at the time-points pre-dose, 0.5 hours, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36,48 and 72 hours post-dose. The analysis was done under fasting condition post single dose. PK Parameter Population was used for analysis. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

,
InterventionHour nanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Ambrisentan AUC (0-inf)Tadalafil, AUC (0-inf)
Part 3B,Treatment R33277.8114938.29
Part 3B,Treatment Y13397.5114724.34

[back to top]

AUC (0-inf) for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil, FDCs (Ambrisentan 5 mg + Tadalafil 20 mg) Relative to Reference Monotherapies Tested (Ambrisentan 5 mg & Tadalafil 20 mg) Under Fasted Conditions-3B

AUC (0- inf), is defined as area under the concentration-time curve of the analyte in plasma over the time interval from 0 extrapolated to infinity for ambrisentan and tadafil. Blood samples of 2.7 mL and 2 mL were collected for ambrisentan and tadafil respectively. The plasma samples for Part 3B, were collected at the time-points pre-dose, 0.5 hours, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose. The analysis, was done under fasting conditions post single dose. PK parameter population was used for analysis. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

,
InterventionHour*nanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Ambrisentan AUC (0-inf)Tadalafil, AUC (0-inf)
Part 3B,Treatment R43205.517748.47
Part 3B,Treatment Y23347.767962.14

[back to top]

AUC (0 - Inf) for FDC, (Ambrisentan 10 mg + Tadalafil 40 mg) Relative to Reference Monotherapies Tested (Ambrisentan 10 mg & Tadalafil 40 mg), Under Fasting- Part 2

AUC (0- inf), is defined as area under the concentration-time curve of the analyte in plasma over the time interval from 0 extrapolated to infinity for ambrisentan and tadafil. Blood samples of 2.7 mL and 2 mL were collected for ambrisentan and tadafil respectively. The plasma samples for Part 2, were collected at the time-points pre-dose, 0.5 hours, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose. The analysis, was done under fasting condition post single dose. PK parameter Populatio was used for analysis. There is no formal hypotheses tested for Part 2 of the study. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

,,,
InterventionHour*nanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Ambrisentan, AUC (0-inf) (n=21,20,20,20)Tadalafil, AUC ( 0 - inf) (n=20,20,20,20)
Part 2, Treatment FG16179.4114443.86
Part 2, Treatment FG26189.2214502.37
Part 2, Treatment FG36201.4014457.33
Part 2, Treatment R6029.1914006.59

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to Infinite (Inf) Time, AUC (0-inf) of Ambrisentan and Tadalafil in FDC (Ambrisentan 10 mg + Tadalafil 40 mg) and Montherapies (Ambrisentan 10 mg & Tadalafil 40 mg) - Part 1

AUC (0- inf), is defined as area under the concentration-time curve of the analyte in plasma over the time interval from 0 extrapolated to infinity for ambrisentan and tadafil. Blood samples were collected at the indicated time-points. The analysis was done under fasting condition post single dose. There is no formal hypothesis tested for Part 1 of the study. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

,,,,
InterventionHour*nanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Ambrisentan, (AUC 0 - inf)Tadalafil, (AUC 0 - inf)
Part 1, Treatment R5746.7313955.85
Part 1,Treatment F15566.0613408.30
Part 1,Treatment F25556.4414415.47
Part 1,Treatment F35788.9114545.28
Part 1,Treatment F46007.5714418.35

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings, -Part 1

12-lead ECG, was measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest. The data for worst case post-baseline has been reported. Data values for the participants with abnormal clinically significant values are reported. Safety population was used for analysis. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Up to Day 3

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Part 1,Treatment F10
Part 1,Treatment F20
Part 1,Treatment F30
Part 1,Treatment F40
Part 1, Treatment R0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal ECG Findings, -Part 3B

12-lead ECG, were measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest. It was conducted as triplicate at screen and baseline, whereas single measure at other times, unless out of range then triplicates were performed. The data for worst case post-baseline has been reported. Data values for the participants with abnormal clinically significant values are reported. Safety population was used for analysis. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Up to Day 3

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Part 3B,Treatment Y10
Part 3B,Treatment Y20
Part 3B,Treatment R30
Part 3B,Treatment R40

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal ECG Findings, -Part 3A

12-lead ECG, were measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest. It was conducted as triplicate at screen and baseline, whereas single measure at other times, unless out of range then triplicates were performed. The data for worst case post-baseline has been reported. Data values for the participants with abnormal clinically significant values are reported. Safety population was used for analysis. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Up to Day 3

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Part 3A,Treatment X10
Part 3A,Treatment X20
Part 3A,Treatment R10
Part 3A,Treatment R20

[back to top]

Time Taken to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil in FDC and Reference Treatment - Part 3B

Serial blood samples were collected at the indicated time-points. In Part 3B, tmax was determined for ambrisentan and tadalafil when administered in FDC (10mg/40mg) under fed state and fasted state and as reference monotherapies (ambrisentan 10 mg and tadalafil 40 mg). PK parameter population was used to measure the tmax. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

,,,
InterventionHour (Median)
Ambrisentan, TmaxTadafil, Tmax
Part 3B,Treatment R32.0002.500
Part 3B,Treatment R41.7582.008
Part 3B,Treatment Y11.7672.500
Part 3B,Treatment Y21.5001.500

[back to top]

Time Taken to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil in FDC and Reference Treatment - Part 3A

Serial blood samples were collected at the indicated time-points. In Part 3A, tmax was determined for ambrisentan and tadalafil when administered in FDC (10mg/40mg) under fed state and fasted state and as reference monotherapies (ambrisentan 10 mg and tadalafil 40 mg). PK parameter population was used to measure the tmax. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

,,,
InterventionHour (Median)
Ambrisentan, TmaxTadafil, Tmax
Part 3A,Treatment R14.008.000
Part 3A,Treatment R22.0002.258
Part 3A,Treatment X14.008.000
Part 3A,Treatment X21.5002.500

[back to top]

AUC (0-t) for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil, FDCs (Ambrisentan 5 mg + Tadalafil 20 mg) Relative to Reference Monotherapies Tested (Ambrisentan 5 mg & Tadalafil 20 mg) Under Fasted Conditions- Part 3B

AUC (0-t), was defined as, the AUC measured from the time of dose to the last measurable concentration. Blood samples of 2.7 mL and 2 mL, were collected for ambrisentan and tadafil respectively. The plasma samples for Part 3B, were collected at the time-points pre-dose, 0.5 hours, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose. The analysis was done under fasting condition post single dose. PK parameter population was used for analysis. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

,
InterventionHour*nanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Ambrisentan AUC (0-t)Tadalafil, AUC (0-t)
Part 3B,Treatment R43116.107076.48
Part 3B,Treatment Y23254.707264.28

[back to top]

Time Taken to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil in FDC and Reference Treatment - Part 2

Serial blood samples were collected at the indicated time-points. In Part 3A, tmax was determined for ambrisentan and tadalafil when administered in FDC (10mg/40mg) under fed state and fasted state and as reference monotherapies (ambrisentan 10 mg and tadalafil 40 mg). PK parameter population was used to measure the tmax. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

,,,
Interventionhour (Median)
Ambrisentan, Tmax (n=21,20,20,20)Tadafil, Tmax (n=20,20,20,20)
Part 2, Treatment FG11.5001.750
Part 2, Treatment FG21.5002.000
Part 2, Treatment FG31.5082.000
Part 2, Treatment R1.5002.017

[back to top]

Time Taken to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil in FDC and Reference Treatment - Part 1

Serial blood samples were collected at the indicated time-points. In Part 3A, tmax was determined for ambrisentan and tadalafil when administered in FDC (10mg/40mg) under fed state and fasted state and as reference monotherapies (ambrisentan 10 mg and tadalafil 40 mg). PK parameter population was used to measure the tmax. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

,,,,
InterventionHour (Median)
Ambrisentan, TmaxTadafil, Tmax
Part 1, Treatment R1.5001.500
Part 1,Treatment F11.0001.500
Part 1,Treatment F21.5002.000
Part 1,Treatment F31.5002.000
Part 1,Treatment F41.5002.000

[back to top]

Plasma t1/2 for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil in FDC and Reference Treatment Under Fed and Fasted Condition- Part 3B

t1/2 is defined as the time required by the concentration of the drug to reach half of its original value. The serial blood samples were assessed at specified timepoints. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5 hours, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 hours postdose

,,,
InterventionHour (Geometric Mean)
Ambrisentan, t1/2Tadalafil, t1/2
Part 3B,Treatment R316.1520.34
Part 3B,Treatment R416.0018.95
Part 3B,Treatment Y116.3920.27
Part 3B,Treatment Y216.4219.01

[back to top]

Plasma t1/2 for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil in FDC and Reference Treatment Under Fed and Fasted Condition- Part 3A

t1/2 is defined as the time required by the concentration of the drug to reach half of its original value. The serial blood samples were assessed at specified timepoints. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

,,,
InterventionHour (Geometric Mean)
Ambrisentan, t1/2Tadalafil, t1/2
Part 3A,Treatment R114.6619.29
Part 3A,Treatment R215.6319.86
Part 3A,Treatment X115.6520.09
Part 3A,Treatment X215.4219.85

[back to top]

Plasma t1/2 for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil in FDC and Reference Treatment Under Fed and Fasted Condition- Part 2

t1/2 is defined as the time required by the concentration of the drug to reach half of its original value. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

,,,
InterventionHour (Geometric Mean)
Ambrisentan, t1/2 (n=21,20,20,20)Tadalafil, t1/2, (n=20,20,20,20)
Part 2, Treatment FG115.7618.63
Part 2, Treatment FG215.3918.22
Part 2, Treatment FG316.6017.98
Part 2, Treatment R15.1918.58

[back to top]

Plasma Half Life (t1/2) for Ambrisentan and Tadalafil in FDC and Reference Treatment Under Fed and Fasted Condition- Part1

t1/2 is defined as the time required by the concentration of the drug to reach half of its original value. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

,,,,
InterventionHour (Geometric Mean)
Ambrisentan, t1/2Tadalafil, t1/2
Part 1, Treatment R16.0818.04
Part 1,Treatment F116.7417.08
Part 1,Treatment F215.2517.76
Part 1,Treatment F315.7618.38
Part 1,Treatment F415.2518.48

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Urinalysis Results by Dipstick Analysis-Part 3B

Urine samples were collected at Day -1 (Baseline) and 48 hour, from the participants for urinalysis, by standard dipstick method. The parameters analyzed were ketones, glucose, occult blood, and protein. The number of participants with parameters detected as trace-lysed, trace-intact, trace, 2+ and 1+ was reported. Safety Population was used for analysis. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Up to Day 2

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Ketone, trace-lysed, Day -1Ketone, trace-intact, Day -1Ketone, trace, Day -1Ketone, 3+, Day -1Ketone, trace-lysed, 48 hourKetone, trace-intact, 48 hourKetone, trace, 48 hourKetone, 3+, 48 hourGlucose, trace-lysed, Day -1Glucose, trace-Intact, Day -1Glucose, trace, Day -1Glucose, 3+, Day -1Glucose, trace-lysed, 48 hourGlucose, trace-Intact, 48 hourGlucose, trace, 48 hourGlucose, 3+, 48 hourOccult blood, trace-lysed, Day -1Occult blood, trace-Intact, Day -1Occult blood, trace, Day -1Occult blood, 3+, Day -1Occult blood, trace-lysed, 48 hourOccult blood, trace-Intact, 48 hourOccult blood, trace, 48 hourOccult blood, 3+, 48 hourProtein, trace-lysed, Day -1Protein, trace-Intact, Day -1Protein, trace, Day -1Protein, 3+, Day -1Protein, trace-lysed, 48 hourProtein, trace-Intact, 48 hourProtein, trace, 48 hourProtein, 3+, 48 hour
Part 3B,Treatment R300400010000000000300000000100000
Part 3B,Treatment R400100020000000000100010000200010
Part 3B,Treatment Y100100010000000002000000100000020
Part 3B,Treatment Y200410000000000000100000000100010

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Urinalysis Results by Dipstick Analysis-Part 3A

Urine samples were collected at Day -1 (Baseline) and 48 hour, from the participants for urinalysis, by standard dipstick method. The parameters analyzed were ketones, glucose, occult blood, and protein. The number of participants with parameters detected as trace-lysed, trace-intact, trace, 2+ and 1+ was reported. Safety Population was used for analysis. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Up to Day 2

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Ketone, trace-lysed, Day -1Ketone, trace-intact, Day -1Ketone, trace, Day -1Ketone, 2+, Day -1Ketone 1+, Day -1Ketone, trace-lysed, 48 hourKetone, trace-intact, 48 hourKetone, trace, 48 hourKetone, 2+, 48 hourKetone 1+, 48 hourGlucose, trace-lysed, Day -1Glucose, trace-Intact, Day -1Glucose, trace, Day -1Glucose, 2+, Day -1Glucose, 1+, Day -1Glucose, trace-lysed, 48 hourGlucose, trace-Intact, 48 hourGlucose, trace, 48 hourGlucose, 2+, 48 hourGlucose, 1+, 48 hourOccult blood, trace-lysed, Day -1Occult blood, trace-Intact, Day -1Occult blood, trace, Day -1Occult blood, 2+, Day -1Occult blood, 1+, Day -1Occult blood, trace-lysed, 48 hourOccult blood, trace-Intact, 48 hourOccult blood, trace, 48 hourOccult blood, 2+, 48 hourOccult blood, 1+, 48 hourProtein, trace-lysed, Day -1Protein, trace-Intact, Day -1Protein, trace, Day -1Protein, 2+, Day -1Protein, 1+, Day -1Protein, trace-lysed, 48 hourProtein, trace-Intact, 48 hourProtein, trace, 48 hourProtein, 2+, 48 hourProtein, 1+, 48 hour
Part 3A,Treatment R10040100100000000000041020210010000000000
Part 3A,Treatment R20040000300000000000031000200010020000200
Part 3A,Treatment X10040000200000000000034000130000010000200
Part 3A,Treatment X20030000100000000000062010500000000000000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Urinalysis Results by Dipstick Analysis-Part 2

Urine samples were collected at Day -1 (Baseline) and 48 hour, from the participants for urinalysis, by standard dipstick method. The parameters analyzed were ketones, glucose, occult blood, and protein. The number of participants with parameters detected as trace-lysed, trace-intact, trace, 2+ and 1+ was reported. Safety Population was used for analysis (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Up to Day 2

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Ketone, trace-intact, Day -1Ketone, trace, Day -1Ketone, 2+, Day -1Ketone, trace-intact, 48 hourKetone, trace, 48 hourKetone, 2+, 48 hourGlucose, trace-Intact, Day -1Glucose, trace, Day -1Glucose, 2+, Day -1Glucose, trace-Intact, 48 hourGlucose, trace, 48 hourGlucose, 2+, 48 hourOccult blood, trace-Intact, Day -1Occult blood, trace, Day -1Occult blood, 2+, Day -1Occult blood, trace-Intact, 48 hourOccult blood, trace, 48 hourOccult blood, 2+, 48 hourProtein, trace-Intact, Day -1Protein, trace, Day -1Protein, 2+, Day -1Protein, trace-Intact, 48 hourProtein, trace, 48 hourProtein, 2+, 48 hour
Part 2, Treatment FG1020000000000100000020010
Part 2, Treatment FG2020010000000000000020030
Part 2, Treatment FG3010001000000100100000030
Part 2, Treatment R010010000000000000010031

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs)-Part 1

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE is any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment or is associated with liver injury and impaired liver function. Safety population was used for analysis. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Up to 42 days

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any SAEAny AE
Part 1, Treatment R012
Part 1,Treatment F1012
Part 1,Treatment F2013
Part 1,Treatment F3013
Part 1,Treatment F4015

[back to top]

Number of Participants With SAEs and AEs-Part 3B

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE is any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment or is associated with liver injury and impaired liver function. Safety population was used for analysis. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Up to 44 days

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any SAEAny AE
Part 3B,Treatment R3024
Part 3B,Treatment R4015
Part 3B,Treatment Y1020
Part 3B,Treatment Y2018

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal ECG Findings, -Part 2

12-lead ECG, were measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest. It was conducted as triplicate at screen and baseline, whereas single measure at other times, unless out of range then triplicates were performed. The data for worst case post-baseline has been reported. Data values for the participants with abnormal clinically significant values are reported. Safety population was used for analysis. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Up to Day 3

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Part 2, Treatment R0
Part 2, Treatment FG10
Part 2, Treatment FG20
Part 2, Treatment FG30

[back to top]

Number of Participants With SAEs and AEs-Part 3A

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE is any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment or is associated with liver injury and impaired liver function. Safety population was used for analysis. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Up to 44 days

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any SAEAny AE
Part 3A,Treatment R1025
Part 3A,Treatment R2023
Part 3A,Treatment X1024
Part 3A,Treatment X2021

[back to top]

Number of Participants With SAEs and AEs-Part 2

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE is any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment or is associated with liver injury and impaired liver function. Safety population was used for analysis. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Up to 35 days

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any SAEAny AE
Part 2, Treatment FG1012
Part 2, Treatment FG2014
Part 2, Treatment FG3012
Part 2, Treatment R013

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hematology Values of Potential Clinical Importance (PCI)- Part1

Blood samples were collected from the participants for analysis of hematology parameters like hematocrit, hemoglobin, lymphocytes, neutrophils, platelets and leukocytes. The data for number of participants, with low and high values of PCI have been reported. Safety population was used for analysis. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Up to Day 3

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Hematocrit, lowHematocrit, highHemoglobin, lowHemoglobin, highLymphocytes, lowLymphocyte, highNeutrophils, lowNeutrophils, highPlatelets, lowPlatelets, highLeukocytes, lowLeukocytes, high
Part 1, Treatment R000100100010
Part 1,Treatment F1000000000000
Part 1,Treatment F2000010000020
Part 1,Treatment F3000000100010
Part 1,Treatment F4000000100010

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hematology Values of PCI - Part 3B

Blood samples of 2 mL, via a cannula for were collected from the participants for analysis of hematology parameters like hematocrit, hemoglobin, lymphocytes, neutrophils, platelets and leukocytes. It was conducted at Day 2 (48 hour). The data for number of participants, with low and high values of PCI have been reported. Safety population was used for analysis. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Day 2

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Hematocrit, lowHematocrit, highHemoglobin, lowHemoglobin, highLymphocytes, lowLymphocytes, highNeutrophils, lowNeutrophils, highPlatelets, lowPlatelets, highLeukocytes, lowLeukocytes, high
Part 3B,Treatment R3000000100000
Part 3B,Treatment R4000000200010
Part 3B,Treatment Y1000000000010
Part 3B,Treatment Y2000000200010

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hematology Values of PCI - Part 3A

Blood samples of 2 mL, via a cannula for were collected from the participants for analysis of hematology parameters like hematocrit, hemoglobin, lymphocytes, neutrophils, platelets and leukocytes. It was conducted at Day 2 (48 hours). The data for number of participants, with low and high values of PCI have been reported. Safety population was used for analysis. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Day 2

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Hematocrit, lowHematocrit, highHemoglobin, lowHemoglobin, highLymphocytes, lowLymphocytes, highNeutrophils, lowNeutrophils, highPlatelets, lowPlatelets, highLeukocytes, lowLeukocytes, high
Part 3A,Treatment R1000000000000
Part 3A,Treatment R2000000100010
Part 3A,Treatment X1000010000000
Part 3A,Treatment X2000010200010

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hematology Values of PCI - Part 2

Blood samples were collected from the participants for analysis of hematology parameters like hematocrit, hemoglobin, lymphocytes, neutrophils, platelets and leukocytes. The data for number of participants, with low and high values of PCI have been reported. Safety population was used for analysis. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Day 2

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Hematocrit, lowHematocrit, highHemoglobin, lowHemoglobin, highLymphocytes, lowLymphocytes, highNeutrophils, lowNeutrophils, highPlatelets, lowPlatelets, highLeukocytes, lowLeukocytes, high
Part 2, Treatment FG1000000100000
Part 2, Treatment FG2000000000000
Part 2, Treatment FG30000001000000
Part 2, Treatment R000000101000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Values of PCI- Part1

Blood samples of 2 mL, via a cannula for were collected from the participants for analysis of clinical chemistry parameters like glucose, calcium, albumin, sodium and potassium. The data for number of participants, with low and high values of PCI have been reported. Safety population was used for analysis. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Day 2

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Glucose, lowGlucose, highAlbumin, lowAlbumin, highCalcium, lowCalcium, highPotassium, lowPotassium, highSodium, lowSodium, high
Part 1, Treatment R0000000000
Part 1,Treatment F10000000000
Part 1,Treatment F20000000000
Part 1,Treatment F30000000000
Part 1,Treatment F40000000000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Values of PCI- Part 3B

Blood samples of 2 mL, via a cannula for were collected from the participants for analysis of clinical chemistry parameters like glucose, calcium, albumin, sodium and potassium. It was collected at Day 2 (48 hour). The data for number of participants, with low and high values of PCI have been reported. Safety population was used for analysis. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Day 2

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Glucose, lowGlucose, highAlbumin, lowAlbumin, highCalcium, lowCalcium, highPotassium, lowPotassium, highSodium, lowSodium, high
Part 3B,Treatment R30000000000
Part 3B,Treatment R40000000000
Part 3B,Treatment Y10000000100
Part 3B,Treatment Y20000000000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Values of PCI- Part 3A

Blood samples of 2 mL, via a cannula for were collected from the participants for analysis of clinical chemistry parameters like glucose, calcium, albumin, sodium and potassium. It was collected at (48 hour). The data for number of participants, with low and high values of PCI have been reported. Safety population was used for analysis. (NCT02688387)
Timeframe: Day 2

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Glucose, lowGlucose, highAlbumin, lowAlbumin, highCalcium, lowCalcium, highPotassium, lowPotassium, highSodium, lowSodium, high
Part 3A,Treatment R10000000000
Part 3A,Treatment R20000000000
Part 3A,Treatment X10000000000
Part 3A,Treatment X20000000000

[back to top]

Insulin Sensitivity After 12 Weeks of Drug Therapy

Subjects will undergo an insulin modified fasting intravenous glucose tolerance test (FS-IVGTT) protocol at 12 weeks adjusted statistically for the baseline measurement. (NCT02819440)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionml/kg/min/μIU ml (Median)
Tadalafil1.4
Placebo1.5

[back to top]

Sexual Function

The Female Sexual Function Index will be used to measure sexual function in women with a range from 2-36 with higher scores indicating better sexual function. (NCT02819440)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Tadalafil23.9
Placebo19.8

[back to top]

Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) (g)

fat mass at 12 weeks. (NCT02819440)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventiongrams (Mean)
Tadalafil47
Placebo50

[back to top]

Resting Energy Expenditure After 12 Weeks of Drug Therapy (kcal/Day)

Subjects will undergo a metabolic chamber protocol to measure resting exercise energy expenditure (kcal/min) at 12 weeks adjusted statistically for the baseline measurement. (NCT02819440)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionkcal/day (Mean)
Tadalafil1267
Placebo1268

[back to top]

Quality of Life Using the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Score

Quality of life will be assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). The SF-36 is a 36 question survey with a total score range from 0-100; higher scores indicate better quality of life. (NCT02819440)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Tadalafil52.7
Placebo51.0

[back to top]

Physical Activity-induced Energy Expenditure (kcal/Day)

During the metabolic chamber protocol, conducted at baseline and at 12 weeks, the cardiopulmonary exercise test protocol will be conducted. The Energy Expenditure (EE) related to physical activity will be calculated as peak EE above the resting level while performing the exercise test. (NCT02819440)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionkcal/day (Mean)
Tadalafil3320
Placebo3269

[back to top]

Maximal Oxygen Consumption

Subjects will undergo a symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise test to measure peak oxygen consumption (VO2 max). Maximal oxygen consumption will be measured as 'mL/min'. (NCT02819440)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionmL/min (Mean)
Tadalafil883
Placebo893

[back to top]

Maximal Exercise Energy Expenditure (kcal/Day)

"Subjects will undergo a metabolic chamber protocol to measure maximal exercise energy expenditure (kcal/min) at 12 weeks adjusted statistically for the baseline measurement. Maximal Exercise Energy Expenditure will be measured as kcal/day" (NCT02819440)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionkcal/day (Mean)
Tadalafil4535
Placebo4588

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Satisfactory Clinical Response at Week 24

"The treatment is assessed as efficient (participants with satisfactory clinical response) in case at least 2 out of the following 3 criteria were fulfilled~6 Minute Walking Distance increase by ≥ 10% or ≥ 30 m from baseline to Week 24~World Health Organization Functional Class (WHO FC) I or II at Week 24~N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) reduction ≥ 30% from baseline to Week 24 (NT-proBNP ratio Week 24/baseline ≤ 0.7) and in absence of the defined criteria of clinical worsening" (NCT02891850)
Timeframe: At Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
With satisfactory clinical responseWithout satisfactory clinical response
PDE-5i2390
Riociguat4566

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adjudicated Clinical Worsening at Week 24

Clinical worsening was defined as death of any cause, hospitalization due to worsening pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) (adjudicated) or disease progression (adjudicated). (NCT02891850)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Riociguat1
PDE-5i10

[back to top]

Change in World Health Organization Functional Class (WHO FC) With Last Observation Carried Forward From Baseline to Week 24

The participant's functional class was determined by using the WHO classification. Possible classes range from I (patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) but without resulting limitation of physical activity) to IV (patients with PH with inability to carry out any physical activity without symptoms). (NCT02891850)
Timeframe: From baseline and up to 24 weeks

Interventionclass (Mean)
Riociguat-0.5
PDE-5i-0.2

[back to top]

Change in 6 Minute Walking Distance (6MWD) With Last Observation Carried Forward From Baseline to 24 Weeks

Six-minute walk distance (6MWD) was conducted to test the physical limitations of the participant by assessing the participant's exercise capacity. The distance walked by the participant in 6 minutes was measured. (NCT02891850)
Timeframe: From baseline and up to 24 weeks

Interventionmeters (m) (Mean)
Riociguat36.448
PDE-5i13.884

[back to top]

Change in N-terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) With Last Observation Carried Forward at Week 24

N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels in the blood are used for screening, diagnosis of acute congestive heart failure (CHF) and may be useful to establish prognosis in heart failure. (NCT02891850)
Timeframe: From baseline and up to 24 weeks

Interventionpicograms per milliliter (pg/mL) (Mean)
Riociguat-88.234
PDE-5i81.414

[back to top]

Best Overall Response (BOR)

Best overall response is defined as the best response recorded from the start of the treatment until disease progression/recurrence (taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest measurements recorded since the treatment started) assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)v1.1. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all target lesions. Partial Response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. Progressive Disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progressions). Stable Disease (SD) is neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters while on study. (NCT03785210)
Timeframe: Every 2 months and then every 6 months after discontinuation of treatment, for survival purposes, up to 3 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive DiseaseNot Evaluable
Cohort 1, Arm 1, Treatment Assignment Code 1, Participants With Hepatocellular Carcinoma00141
Cohort 2, Arm 1, Treatment Assignment Code 1, Participants With Liver Metastases00196

[back to top] [back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) of Nivolumab Combined With Oral Vancomycin and Tadalafil in Participants With Refractory Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) or Liver Dominant Metastatic Cancer From Colorectal Cancer or Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)

Overall survival is calculated from the on-study date to the day of death using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT03785210)
Timeframe: Participants were followed from the on-study date to post discontinuation of treatment until the day of death, an average of 8 months.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Cohort 1, Arm 1, Treatment Assignment Code 1, Participants With Hepatocellular Carcinoma9.4
Cohort 2, Arm 1, Treatment Assignment Code 1, Participants With Liver Metastases3.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0)

Here is the number of participants with serious and/or non-serious adverse events assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0). A non-serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence. A serious adverse event is an adverse event or suspected adverse reaction that results in death, a life-threatening adverse drug experience, hospitalization, disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect or important medical events that jeopardize the patient or subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the previous outcomes mentioned. (NCT03785210)
Timeframe: Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately 41 months/11 days and 36 months/22 days for the first and second group respectively.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort 1, Arm 1, Treatment Assignment Code 1, Participants With Hepatocellular Carcinoma6
Cohort 2, Arm 1, Treatment Assignment Code 1, Participants With Liver Metastases16

[back to top]

Change in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR) Expressed as the Ratio of Geometric Means of End of Double-blind Treatment (EDBT) to Baseline

Change in PVR expressed as the ratio of geometric means of EDBT to baseline were reported. (NCT03904693)
Timeframe: Baseline, EDBT (up to 16 weeks)

InterventionRatio (Geometric Mean)
Treatment-naive And Prior ERA Strata: Macitentan 10 Milligrams (mg)0.77
Treatment-naive And Prior ERA Strata: M/T FDC0.55
Treatment-naive And Prior PDE-5i Strata: Tadalafil 20 mg0.78
Treatment-naive And Prior PDE-5i Strata: M/T FDC0.56

[back to top]

Percentage of Uses Per Patient That Led to an Onset of Erection Within a Certain Period of Time in Patients Randomised to MED3000.

"Demonstrate a speed of onset of action from application of MED3000 gel to the time when patient notices their erection starting.~Percentage of MED3000 uses per patient that resulted in the patient noticing their erection starting within certain period of time, out of the total number of intercourse attempts made using the product during the 24-week treatment period. The certain periods of time are within 15 minutes, 10 minutes and 5 minutes. Percentage of uses is calculated with the denominator equal to the total number of intercourse attempts made using the product during the 24-week treatment period and the numerator equal to the total number of times that the response to the onset of action question 1 indicated a time of 5 (10, 15) minutes or less.~Question 1 of the Onset of Action questionnaire:~- After application of the gel/taking medication, when did you begin to notice your erection starting?" (NCT04984993)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage of uses per patient (Mean)
15 minutes10 minutes5 minutes
MED300062.5947.8124.01

[back to top]

Percentage of Uses Per Patient That Led to an Onset of Action Within a Certain Period of Time in Patients Randomised to MED3000.

"Demonstrate a speed of onset of action from application of MED3000 gel to the time when the patients is able to have penetrative sex.~Percentage of MED3000 uses per patient that resulted in the patient being able to have penetrative sex within certain period of time, out of the total number of intercourse attempts made using the product during the 24-week treatment period. The certain periods of time are within 15 minutes, 10 minutes and 5 minutes. Percentage of uses is calculated with the denominator equal to the total number of intercourse attempts made using the product during the 24-week treatment period and the numerator equal to the total number of times that the response to the onset of action question 2 indicated a time of 5 (10, 15) minutes or less.~Question 2 of the Onset of Action questionnaire:~- After application of the gel/taking medication, when were you able to have penetrative sex?" (NCT04984993)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage of uses per patient (Mean)
15 minutes10 minutes5 minutes
MED300055.7031.9113.72

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Erectile Function (EF) Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Questionnaire, in Patients Randomised to MED3000, at Week 24

"Co-primary objectives:~Demonstrate an improvement compared to baseline of erectile function, in patients randomised to receive MED3000, using the IIEF-EF patient reported outcome instrument.~Observe a mean change from baseline of the IIEF-EF, in patients randomised to MED3000, greater or equal to the minimal clinically importance difference of 4.~The IIEF is a validated questionnaire, consisting of 15 questions, for detecting treatment changes in EF. The EF domain of IIEF is derived using questions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 15. A score of 0 to 5 is awarded to each of questions 1 to 5 and a score of 1 to 5 is awarded to question 15. Higher scores indicate better sexual function. Domain score is computed by summing the scores for individual questions. The minimum and maximum possible scores are 1 and 30 respectively. Patients with a score of 21 or less are considered to have ED. Change from baseline = Week 24 score - Baseline score." (NCT04984993)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
MED30005.73

[back to top]