Page last updated: 2024-12-05

hydrocortisone acetate

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

hydrocortisone acetate: RN given refers to cpd without isomeric designation [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID5744
CHEMBL ID1091
CHEBI ID17609
SCHEMBL ID7419
MeSH IDM0076886

Synonyms (336)

Synonym
MLS002207225
CHEMBL1091
hydrocortisoni acetas
smr000653536
MLS001076491
AB00430024-17
11beta,17-dihydroxy-3,20-dioxopregn-4-en-21-yl acetate
CHEBI:17609 ,
21-o-acetylcortisol
hydrocortisone 21-acetate
anusol-hc
corticosterone, 17-hydroxy-, 21-acetate
hydrocortison
supralef
nsc 741
hydrison
iracetisone
idrocortisone acetano
acetate-as
cortiderm
dermosa hidrocortisona
allocort
corticaine cream
21-acetoxy-11-beta,17-alpha-dihydroxypregn-4-ene-3,20-dione
cortimycine
orabase hca
velopural
cortiform
siguent hycor
crema transcutan
chloromycetin hydrocortisone ophthalmic
idrocortigamma
u-cort
corti selbe
ai3-26389
squibb-hc
efzem
dricort
corti
sintotrat
hycor eye oitment
hemsol-hc
hydrosone-a
micort-hc
posterine corte
sanadermil
wycort
soenol hydrocortison
hydrocortison streuli
idrocort
oft cusi hidrocortisona
alfacorton
hydriocort von ct
ebenol
korti
acepolcort-h
ekzemsalbe f
fenitral
sagittacortin
paro
cortisporin cream
pannocort
ophticor
11-beta,17-alpha-dihydroxy-21-acetoxypregesterone
cortidro
derminovag
hyderm
clear-aid
hipokort
latimit
einecs 200-004-4
berlison
pregn-4-ene-3,20-dione, 21-(acetoxy)-11,17-dihydroxy-, (11-beta)-
pregn-4-ene-3,20-dione, 11-beta,17,21-trihydroxy-, 21-acetate
glycocortison
lenirit
cortic
17-alpha-hydroxycorticosterone acetate
pregn-4-ene-3,20-dione, 11beta,17,21-trihydroxy-, 21-acetate
pregn-4-ene-3,20-dione, 21-(acetyloxy)-11,17-dihydroxy-, (11beta)-
hydro-adreson [inj.]
cortioftal
medithane
bacicoline
urecortyn
LMST02030093
11beta,17,21-trihydroxypregn-4-ene-3,20-dione, 21-acetate
u-cort (tn)
cortifoam (tn)
D00165
hydrocortisone acetate (jp17/usp)
ACON1_000363
hydrocal
MEGXM0_000464
ACON0_000402
component of neo-cortef
aceto-cort
cortril acetate
cortacream
bambicort
pregn-4-ene-3, 21-(acetyloxy)-11,17-dihydroxy-, (11.beta.)-
17-hydroxycorticosterone, 21-acetate
hydroxycorticosterone acetate
component of protef
isopto-hydrocortisone
carmol hc
hydrocortone acetate
cortes
chemysone
21-acetoxy-11.beta.17.alpha.-dihydroxypregn-4-ene-3,20-dione
cortef acetate
biocortar
lanacort
hydrocortisat
cortril acetate-as
cortisol, 21-acetate
nsc-741
hydrocortistab
50-03-3
hydrin-2
pregn-4-ene-3, 11.beta.,17,21-trihydroxy-, 21-acetate
hydrosone
cortisol acetate
eye-cort
C02821
17-hydroxycorticosterone acetate
hysone-a
cortisol 21-acetate
berlison f
pabracort
cortaid
17-hydroxycorticosterone-21-acetate
abbocort
cortifoam
wln: l e5 b666 ov mutj a cq e fv1ov1 fq -b&acef
17.alpha.-hydrocorticosterone-21-acetate
hydrocortisone acetate
collusul-hc
11.beta.17.alpha.-dihydroxy-21-acetoxypregesterone
cortisol- 21-acetate
cortell
compound f acetate
nsc741
hydrocortisone-21-acetate
mysone
resicort
17.alpha.-hydroxycorticosterone acetate
hycortole acetate
epifoam
hydrocortisone 21-acetate, >=98% (hplc)
hydrocortisone 21-acetate, meets usp testing specifications
MLS000069734 ,
smr000058178
NCGC00021277-03
HMS2090M06
BRD-K11612998-001-01-6
[2-[(8s,9s,10r,11s,13s,14s,17r)-11,17-dihydroxy-10,13-dimethyl-3-oxo-2,6,7,8,9,11,12,14,15,16-decahydro-1h-cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-17-yl]-2-oxoethyl] acetate
HMS3259E05
colifoam
EN300-50291
2-[(1r,3as,3bs,9ar,9bs,10s,11as)-1,10-dihydroxy-9a,11a-dimethyl-7-oxo-1h,2h,3h,3ah,3bh,4h,5h,7h,8h,9h,9ah,9bh,10h,11h,11ah-cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-1-yl]-2-oxoethyl acetate
[2-[(8s,9s,10r,11s,13s,14s,17r)-10,13-dimethyl-11,17-bis(oxidanyl)-3-oxidanylidene-2,6,7,8,9,11,12,14,15,16-decahydro-1h-cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-17-yl]-2-oxidanylidene-ethyl] ethanoate
A827940
acetic acid [2-[(8s,9s,10r,11s,13s,14s,17r)-11,17-dihydroxy-10,13-dimethyl-3-oxo-2,6,7,8,9,11,12,14,15,16-decahydro-1h-cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-17-yl]-2-oxoethyl] ester
gentisone hc
MLS002548890
AKOS015919714
HMS2230H03
HMS2235G21
unii-3x7931po74
hydrocortisone acetate [usp:ban:jan]
ec 200-004-4
3x7931po74 ,
ala scalp
hydrocortisone sodium succinate impurity b [ep impurity]
hydrocortisone acetate [who-ip]
pregn-4-ene-3,20-dione, 21-(acetyloxy)-11,17-dihydroxy-, (11.beta.)-
hydrocortisone acetate component of proctofoam hc
hydrocortisone 21-acetate [mi]
hydrocortisone acetate component of chloromycetin hydrocortisone
hydrocortisone acetate component of pramosone
hydrocortisone impurity c [ep impurity]
ophthocort component hydrocortisone acetate
hydrocortisone acetate component of u-cort
hydrocortisone acetate [who-dd]
hydrocortisoni acetas [who-ip latin]
hydrocortisone acetate component of coly-mycin s
chloromycetin hydrocortisone component hydrocortisone acetate
carmol hc component hydrocortisone acetate
hydrocortisone acetate component of carmol hc
pramosone component hydrocortisone acetate
hydrocortisone acetate [orange book]
hydrocortisone acetate [ep monograph]
hydrocortisone acetate component of ophthocort
hydrocortisone acetate [mart.]
coly-mycin s component hydrocortisone acetate
neo-cortef component hydrocortisone acetate
hydrocortisone acetate [usp-rs]
hydrocortisone acetate component of epifoam
hydrocortisone acetate component of terra-cortril
hydrocortisone acetate [vandf]
hydrocortisone hydrogen succinate impurity b [ep impurity]
hydrocortisone acetate [jan]
hydrocortisone acetate [inci]
hydrocortisone acetate component of cor-oticin
cor-oticin component hydrocortisone acetate
proctofoam hc component hydrocortisone acetate
hydrocortisone acetate [green book]
hydrocortisone acetate [usp monograph]
terra-cortril component hydrocortisone acetate
u-cort component hydrocortisone acetate
hydrocortisone acetate component of neo-cortef
prednisolone acetate impurity a [ep]
hydrocortisone acetate [ep impurity]
epifoam component hydrocortisone acetate
S5501
CCG-220891
NC00457
SCHEMBL7419
KS-1070
CS-4792
hydrocortisone 21-acetate, antibiotic for culture media use only
Q-201212
21-acetoxy-11.beta.,17.alpha.-dihydroxypregn-4-ene-3,20-dione
chloromycetin hydrocortisone ophthalmic (salt/mix)
pregn-4-ene-3,20-dione, 11.beta.,17,21-trihydroxy-, 21-acetate
neobacimyx (salt/mix)
11,17-dihydroxy-3,20-dioxopregn-4-en-21-yl acetate, (11.beta.)-
corticaine cream (salt/mix)
11.beta.,17.alpha.-dihydroxy-21-acetoxypregesterone
cordes
coly-mycin s otic (salt/mix)
hc45
21-acetoxy-11.beta.,17-dihydroxypregn-4-en-3,20-dione
terra-cortril (salt/mix)
colofoam
proctocream-hc (salt/mix)
21-acetoxy-11.beta.,17-dihydroxypregn-4-ene-3,20-dione
bacicoline (salt/mix)
caldecort
efcolin
proctofoam-hc (salt/mix)
clear-aid (salt/mix)
epifoam (salt/mix)
11.beta.,17.alpha.,21-trihydroxypregn-4-ene-3,20-dione 21-acetate
protef (salt/mix)
cortisporin cream (salt/mix)
mantadil (salt/mix)
neo-cortef (salt/mix)
pregn-4-ene-3,20-dione, 21-(acetoxy)-11,17-dihydroxy-, (11-.beta.)-
lidamantle-hc (salt/mix)
HY-B1183
OPERA_ID_774
mfcd00037714
11beta,17alpha,21-trihydroxy-4-pregnene-3,20-dione 21-acetate
hydrocortisone (acetate)
sr-01000000170
SR-01000000170-3
hydrocortisone 21-acetate, tested according to ph.eur.
hydrocortisone 21-acetate, vetranal(tm), analytical standard
hydrocortisone acetate, united states pharmacopeia (usp) reference standard
hydrocortisone acetate, european pharmacopoeia (ep) reference standard
hydrocortisone 21-acetate, sigma reference standard
bdbm50474607
chloromycetin hydrocort
gppe eye crm
gppe foam aero
genticin hc
fucidin h
hepacort plus
cortucid
hc45 hydrocort
gppe ear susp
barquinol hc
hydrocortisone acetate, pharmaceutical secondary standard; certified reference material
hydrocortisone acetate for peak identification, european pharmacopoeia (ep) reference standard
HMS3714D04
hydrocortisone acetate, british pharmacopoeia (bp) reference standard
DB14539
Q27102474
hydrocortisone-acetate
D97703
DTXSID20962156
42016-02-4
hydrocortisone acetate for peak identification
(11beta)-21-acetyloxy)-11,17-dihydroxypregn-4-ene-3,20-dione
Z600425184
roosin
mysimplepetlab itchy ear relief
hair sanityhair sanity part i
aftate hydrocortisone cream
careall hydrocortisone
hydrocortisone impurity c (ep impurity)
anti-itch vulva cream 1 hydrocortisone acetate
xpect hydrocortisone
careall hydrocortisonemaximum strength
nucort
hairsanity step 1
hydrocortisone acetate (usp:ban:jan)
dog mx-hydrocortisone
promika anti-itch hydrocortisonefor cats and dogs
green guard hydrocortisone 1%
advanced anti-itch therapy
well and good relieve itching and soothe skin irritations
medi-first plus hydrocortisone 1%
cortisil mdx
ancalima hydrocortisone cream
zee hydrocream
rectacort-hc
biocorneum advanced scar treatment anti-itch
prednisolone acetate impurity a
biocorneum hc advanced scar supervision anti-itch
medi-first 1% hydrocortisone
american safety and first aid
gadaderm hydrocortisone
vanicream hc anti-itch
hemmorex-hc
11beta,17,21-trihydroxypregn-4-ene-3,20-dione 21-acetate
hydrocortisone acetate 1%
hair sanity
hydro-adreson (inj.)
thompson hydrocortisone 1%
immediate comfortbioelements
hydrocortisone acetate (ep monograph)
hydrocortisone acetateantipruritic (anti-itch)
genuine hydrocortisone
hydrocortisone acetate (usp-rs)
neomed pharmaceutical
hydrocortisone acetate (usp monograph)
hydrocortisone acetate (mart.)
medi-first hydrocortisone 1%
zcort
zcortultra
hydrocortisone acetate (ep impurity)
poli-a
vagisil anti-itch creme maximum strength sensitive skin formula

Research Excerpts

Actions

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Hydrocortisone acetate is known to produce polycystic kidney disease when administered to susceptible animals in the perinatal period. "( Effects of lithium chloride and ethacrynic acid on experimental polycystic kidney disease.
Crocker, JF; McDonald, AT, 1988
)
1.72

Treatment

Hydrocortisone acetate treatment significantly reduces Mg content in the litters. Treatment did not increase intestinal worm burdens in NIH mice.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Hydrocortisone acetate treatment significantly reduces Mg content in the litters, which can be explained on the basis of a significant decrease in both the magnesium absorption and retention by the hormone-treated mothers."( Influence of hydrocortisone acetate on the magnesium metabolism during pregnancy in rats.
Llopis, J; López Frias, M; Montellano, MA; Urbano, G, 1987
)
1.36
"Treatment with hydrocortisone acetate did not increase intestinal worm burdens in NIH mice."( Necator americanus in inbred mice: a re-evaluation of primary infection kinetics.
Behnke, JM; Timothy, LM, 1993
)
0.63
"Pretreatment with hydrocortisone acetate (20 or 40 mg/kg, s.c.) reduced PAF-induced gastric bleeding and increase in GMVP, in contrast to the aggravation by caffeic acid (1 or 5 mg/kg, s.c.)."( Gastric bleeding and increased gastric vascular permeability induced by platelet activating factor (PAF): effect of drugs that affect arachidonate metabolism.
Hatakeyama, K; Watanabe, K; Yano, S, 1991
)
0.6

Toxicity

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Specialized skin care regimens may help to minimize adverse events (AEs) following non-ablative facial procedures."( An open-label trial examining the efficacy and safety of a pre- and postprocedure topical five-product system (Clinique Medical Optimizing Regimen) specifically formulated to complement laser/light-based facial cosmetic procedures.
Beer, KR; Cohen, JL; Narurkar, VA, 2010
)
0.36
"This topical five-product skin care system was safe and effective in conjunction with non-ablative FL/IPL procedures."( An open-label trial examining the efficacy and safety of a pre- and postprocedure topical five-product system (Clinique Medical Optimizing Regimen) specifically formulated to complement laser/light-based facial cosmetic procedures.
Beer, KR; Cohen, JL; Narurkar, VA, 2010
)
0.36
" The secondary outcome measurements included the following: survey questionnaires of gastrointestinal disorder, amount and frequency of ointment application for AD, dermatology quality of life index, and safety evaluation (diagnostic test, adverse reaction, and vital sign monitoring)."( Efficacy and safety of Soshiho-tang in atopic dermatitis patients with gastrointestinal disorders: A double-blinded, randomized, and placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Jo, EH; Jung, JY; Kang, SJ; Lee, JH; Park, MC; Shim, YH; Yang, GJ, 2021
)
0.62

Pharmacokinetics

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"The hydrocortisone pharmacokinetic profiles of hydrocortisone acetate foam (Proctocort) administered rectally was assessed in healthy volunteers and patients with ulcerative colitis or X-irradiation colitis."( Pharmacokinetics and absolute rectal bioavailability of hydrocortisone acetate in distal colitis.
Astier, A; Louchahi, K; Nicolas, P; Perret, G; Petitjean, O; Tod, M; Wendling, JL, 1992
)
0.79

Compound-Compound Interactions

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Hydrocortisone acetate combined with the antibiotics improved individual symptoms better as did the steroid-free ointment."( Topical treatment of acute otitis externa: clinical comparison of an antibiotics ointment alone or in combination with hydrocortisone acetate.
Domröse, CM; Löffler, J; Mösges, R, 2007
)
1.46
"This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of hydrocortisone cream, combined with mupirocin or alone with emmolient ointment for the treatment of mild to moderate AD in infants between six months and two years of age."( Hydrocortisone acetate alone or combined with mupirocin for atopic dermatitis in infants under two years of age - a randomized double blind pilot trial.
Canpolat, F; Erkoçoğlu, M; Kandi, B; Kocabaş, CN; Tezer, H, 2012
)
1.82
" Also there was a significant improvement in patients combined with mupirocin ointment [74% (20 of 27)]."( Hydrocortisone acetate alone or combined with mupirocin for atopic dermatitis in infants under two years of age - a randomized double blind pilot trial.
Canpolat, F; Erkoçoğlu, M; Kandi, B; Kocabaş, CN; Tezer, H, 2012
)
1.82
"Monotherapy with hydrocortisone ointment is the main treatment in infants with mild to moderate AD and combination with mupirocin is safe and effective often needed because of possible Staphylococcus carriage."( Hydrocortisone acetate alone or combined with mupirocin for atopic dermatitis in infants under two years of age - a randomized double blind pilot trial.
Canpolat, F; Erkoçoğlu, M; Kandi, B; Kocabaş, CN; Tezer, H, 2012
)
1.82

Bioavailability

The pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of hydrocortisone after. rectal administration of a hydroc Cortisone acetate foam was determined. in healthy subjects as well as in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"The pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of hydrocortisone after rectal administration of a hydrocortisone acetate foam was determined."( Pharmacokinetics and rectal bioavailability of hydrocortisone acetate.
Barth, J; Derendorf, H; Krieg, M; Möllmann, C; Möllmann, H; Tunn, S, 1991
)
0.76
"In order to quantify the intensity of skin blanching and thus predict the bioavailability of topical corticoids, a physical device allowing the measurement of light reflected from skin without any contact between the probe and the skin was used (Leveque et al."( Objective determination of the bioavailability of dermocorticoids--influence of the formulation.
Le Gall, F; Leveque, JL; Poelman, MC, 1984
)
0.27
"The biopharmaceutical studies of 1% hydrocortisone acetate ophthalmic ointments were carried out with isolated pig's eyes and demonstrated that the drug concentration in intraocular fluids depended on: a) ointment base used - the best bioavailability was obtained using white petrolatum with addition of 10% anhydrous lanolin, b) eye fluid examined - concentration of hydrocortisone acetate in aqueous humor was several times higher than in vitreous humor, c) presence of corneal epithelium - in all studied cases abrasion of corneal epithelium was accompanied by well-marked increase of drug concentration in intraocular fluids."( Bioavailability of hydrocortisone acetate from ophthalmic ointments.
Umer, S, 1994
)
0.89
"The pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of hydrocortisone after rectal administration of a hydrocortisone acetate foam were determined after single and multiple dosing in healthy subjects as well as in patients with inflammatory bowel disease."( Pharmacokinetics and rectal bioavailability of hydrocortisone acetate after single and multiple administration in healthy subjects and patients.
Barth, J; Bigalke, C; Derendorf, H; Hochhaus, G; Krieg, M; Möllmann, A; Möllmann, H; Tromm, A, 2001
)
0.79
"Particle size reduction, particularly nanonization, is a non-specific, universal approach to improve the bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs."( New method for the effective production of ultrafine drug nanocrystals.
Möschwitzer, J; Müller, RH,
)
0.13

Dosage Studied

The effectiveness of hydrocortisone (free alcohol) is more than 50 per cent greater than that of either the free or acetated forms of cortisone. Daily injections of at least 125 micrograms corticosterone or 80micrograms hydroc Cortisone acetate were needed to bring about the reappearance of the maturation-delaying substance in the urine of grouped adrenalectomized females.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" This underscores the need for a careful reappraisal of its dosage in long term therapy."( Selective stimulation of carboxylesterases metabolizing charged steroid esters by hydrocortisone.
Ali, B; Kaur, S; Khanna, P; Parmar, SS, 1991
)
0.28
"20 patients with highly dosed irradiation of the small pelvis had been treated with Colifoam (hydrocortisone) in order to prove the therapeutic effect of radiation-induced proctitis."( [Treatment of radiogenic colitis with a rectal foam containing cortisol. Clinical and pharmacologic data].
Böttcher, HD; Jacobi, V; Szepesi, S; Vecsei, P, 1990
)
0.28
" "Early" HCA dosing (days -5 to 6) of adrenalectomized-pneumonectomized animals suppressed lung growth to the pneumonectomy level, but from days 7 to 14 growth accelerated to the adrenalectomized-pneumonectomized rate."( Control of compensatory lung growth by adrenal hormones.
Bennett, RA; Karl, HW; Rannels, DE, 1987
)
0.27
" Pancreatic and intestinal amylase activity was maximized by the highest dosage of HYD (24 mg) and ACTH (15 IU) when given at 2- or 4-d intervals, respectively (P less than ."( Response of digestive carbohydrases and growth to graded doses and administration frequency of hydrocortisone and adrenocorticotropic hormone in nursing piglets.
Chapple, RP; Cuaron, JA; Easter, RA, 1989
)
0.28
" The dose-response effect of all of these drugs on Ig production was similar to the dose response of inhibition of 5-lipoxygenase."( Mechanism of action of glucocorticoid-induced immunoglobulin production: role of lipoxygenase metabolites of arachidonic acid.
Atluru, D; Goodwin, JS, 1986
)
0.27
" The method was then optimized for dexamethasone acetate and cortisone acetate bulk drug and dosage forms."( Reverse phase liquid chromatographic determination of dexamethasone acetate and cortisone acetate in bulk drug substances and dosage forms: method development.
NG, LL,
)
0.13
" This dosage of cortisol did not alter the diurnal rhythm of serum corticosterone in these animals."( Neonatal glucocorticoid administration: effect on the diurnal rhythm of serum concentrations of corticosterone, progesterone and LH, and the response to pregnant mare serum gonadotrophin in immature female rats.
Braverman, M; Cohen, I; Cost, M; Mann, DR, 1984
)
0.27
" In subsequent dose-response experiments, we determined that daily injections of at least 125 micrograms corticosterone or 80 micrograms hydrocortisone acetate were needed to bring about the reappearance of the maturation-delaying substance in the urine of grouped adrenalectomized females."( Effects of adrenalectomy with hormone replacement therapy on the presence of a sexual maturation-delaying chemosignal in the urine of grouped female mice.
Drickamer, LC; Shiro, BC, 1984
)
0.47
" To check its putative immunoprotective/immunorestoring activity, the optimal immunomodulating dosage of commercially available mistletoe extract standardized for the galactoside-specific mistletoe lectin (ML-1) was regularly administered (1 ng ML-1 per kg body weight; subcutaneously)."( Immunoprotective activity of the galactoside-specific mistletoe lectin in cortisone-treated BALB/c-mice.
Beuth, J; Buss, G; Jeljaszewicz, J; Ko, HL; Pulverer, G; Steuer, MK; Tunggal, L,
)
0.13
"The pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of hydrocortisone after rectal administration of a hydrocortisone acetate foam were determined after single and multiple dosing in healthy subjects as well as in patients with inflammatory bowel disease."( Pharmacokinetics and rectal bioavailability of hydrocortisone acetate after single and multiple administration in healthy subjects and patients.
Barth, J; Bigalke, C; Derendorf, H; Hochhaus, G; Krieg, M; Möllmann, A; Möllmann, H; Tromm, A, 2001
)
0.79
" Comparisons of potency made by determining maintenance dosage requirements for equivalent degrees of clinical control in the same patients indicated that the effectiveness of hydrocortisone (free alcohol) is more than 50 per cent greater than that of either the free or acetated forms of cortisone and approximately twice as great as that of hydrocortisone acetate."( Rheumatoid arthritis; experiences with hydrocortisone (free alcohol) and hydrocortisone acetate.
BOLAND, EW, 1952
)
0.64
"This article discusses the downstream processing of nanosuspensions into oral solid dosage forms."( Factors influencing the release kinetics of drug nanocrystal-loaded pellet formulations.
Möschwitzer, JP; Müller, RH, 2013
)
0.39
" The different binder types have influenced the stability of the nanosuspensions, the zeta potential of the drug nanocrystals as well as the dissolution profiles of the final solid dosage forms."( Factors influencing the release kinetics of drug nanocrystal-loaded pellet formulations.
Möschwitzer, JP; Müller, RH, 2013
)
0.39
" This technology is also more variable with respect to the drug load In the final dosage form."( Factors influencing the release kinetics of drug nanocrystal-loaded pellet formulations.
Möschwitzer, JP; Müller, RH, 2013
)
0.39
"A stability indicating method was established through a stress study, wherein different methods of degradation (oxidation, hydrolysis, photolysis, and temperature) were studied simultaneously to determine the active ingredient hydrocortisone acetate, preservatives propyl parahydroxybenzoate, and methyl parahydroxybenzoate, antioxidant butylhydroxyanisole (BHA), and their degradation products in a semisolid dosage gel form."( Development and Validation of a Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Method for Hydrocortisone Acetate Active Ingredient, Propyl Parahydroxybenzoate and Methyl Parahydroxybenzoate Preservatives, Butylhydroxyanisole Antioxidant, and Their Degradation Products in a
Ascaso, M; Carrillo, C; Fàbregas, A; García, M; García-Montoya, E; Miñarro, M; Pérez-Lozano, P; Sarrate, R; Suñé-Negre, JM; Ticó, JR,
)
0.55
"1% cream dosed at least twice daily for a course of 12 weeks."( Randomized open-label trial comparing topical prescription triamcinolone to over-the-counter hydrocortisone for the treatment of phimosis.
Abdelhalim, A; Chalmers, CL; Chamberlin, JD; Chuang, KW; Davis-Dao, CA; Dorgalli, C; Kelly, MS; Khoury, AE; McAleer, IM; Stephany, HA; Wang, ZT; Wehbi, EJ, 2019
)
0.51
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Drug Classes (2)

ClassDescription
cortisol ester
tertiary alpha-hydroxy ketoneAn alpha-hydroxy ketone in which the carbonyl group and the hydroxy group are linked by a carbon bearing two organyl groups.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Protein Targets (16)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Chain A, MAJOR APURINIC/APYRIMIDINIC ENDONUCLEASEHomo sapiens (human)Potency44.66840.003245.467312,589.2998AID2517
Chain A, Beta-lactamaseEscherichia coli K-12Potency84.21810.044717.8581100.0000AID485294
LuciferasePhotinus pyralis (common eastern firefly)Potency33.80780.007215.758889.3584AID588342
ATAD5 protein, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.81960.004110.890331.5287AID504466
TDP1 proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency5.17350.000811.382244.6684AID686979
hypoxia-inducible factor 1, alpha subunit (basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor)Homo sapiens (human)Potency0.12590.00137.762544.6684AID914; AID915
euchromatic histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2Homo sapiens (human)Potency10.00000.035520.977089.1251AID504332
nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 isoform 2Homo sapiens (human)Potency0.05980.00419.984825.9290AID504444; AID720524
transcriptional regulator ERG isoform 3Homo sapiens (human)Potency5.62340.794321.275750.1187AID624246
importin subunit beta-1 isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency1.45815.804836.130665.1308AID540253
snurportin-1Homo sapiens (human)Potency1.45815.804836.130665.1308AID540253
GTP-binding nuclear protein Ran isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency1.45815.804816.996225.9290AID540253
gemininHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.70790.004611.374133.4983AID624297
lamin isoform A-delta10Homo sapiens (human)Potency0.03160.891312.067628.1838AID1487
TAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)Potency7.07951.778316.208135.4813AID652104
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Corticosteroid-binding globulinHomo sapiens (human)Ki0.02820.01323.248110.0000AID51055
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (20)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
glucocorticoid metabolic processCorticosteroid-binding globulinHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of endopeptidase activityCorticosteroid-binding globulinHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of protein phosphorylationTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA processingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
RNA splicingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of protein stabilityTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of insulin secretionTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
response to endoplasmic reticulum stressTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein import into nucleusTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of circadian rhythmTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of apoptotic processTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation by host of viral transcriptionTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
rhythmic processTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
3'-UTR-mediated mRNA destabilizationTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
3'-UTR-mediated mRNA stabilizationTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear inner membrane organizationTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
amyloid fibril formationTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of gene expressionTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (12)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
steroid bindingCorticosteroid-binding globulinHomo sapiens (human)
serine-type endopeptidase inhibitor activityCorticosteroid-binding globulinHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
double-stranded DNA bindingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
RNA bindingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA 3'-UTR bindingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
lipid bindingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
pre-mRNA intronic bindingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
molecular condensate scaffold activityTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (12)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
extracellular regionCorticosteroid-binding globulinHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceCorticosteroid-binding globulinHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeCorticosteroid-binding globulinHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceCorticosteroid-binding globulinHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular non-membrane-bounded organelleTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
perichromatin fibrilsTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic stress granuleTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear speckTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
interchromatin granuleTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
chromatinTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (57)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID588461High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, Validation compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588461High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, Validation compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588461High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, Validation compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID651635Viability Counterscreen for Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID588460High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, Validation Compound Set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588460High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, Validation Compound Set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588460High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, Validation Compound Set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID588459High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, Validation compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588459High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, Validation compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588459High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, Validation compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID504810Antagonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID504812Inverse Agonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID1224864HCS microscopy assay (F508del-CFTR)2016PloS one, , Volume: 11, Issue:10
Increasing the Endoplasmic Reticulum Pool of the F508del Allele of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Leads to Greater Folding Correction by Small Molecule Therapeutics.
AID74378Relative binding affinity to glucocorticoid receptor on cytosol from thymus at 4 hr1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 31, Issue:6
Binding of steroids to the progestin and glucocorticoid receptors analyzed by correspondence analysis.
AID126435Relative binding affinity for mineralocorticoid receptor of rat kidney at 24 hr1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 31, Issue:6
Binding of steroids to the progestin and glucocorticoid receptors analyzed by correspondence analysis.
AID51056Binding affinity to the corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG) receptor.2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-24, Volume: 43, Issue:17
GRid-INdependent descriptors (GRIND): a novel class of alignment-independent three-dimensional molecular descriptors.
AID977599Inhibition of sodium fluorescein uptake in OATP1B1-transfected CHO cells at an equimolar substrate-inhibitor concentration of 10 uM2013Molecular pharmacology, Jun, Volume: 83, Issue:6
Structure-based identification of OATP1B1/3 inhibitors.
AID74377Relative binding affinity to glucocorticoid receptor on cytosol from thymus at 24 hr1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 31, Issue:6
Binding of steroids to the progestin and glucocorticoid receptors analyzed by correspondence analysis.
AID19427HPLC capacity factor (k)2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-27, Volume: 43, Issue:15
ElogPoct: a tool for lipophilicity determination in drug discovery.
AID74375Relative binding affinity to glucocorticoid receptor on cytosol from liver at 24 hr1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 31, Issue:6
Binding of steroids to the progestin and glucocorticoid receptors analyzed by correspondence analysis.
AID39320Relative binding affinity for androgen receptor of prostate of rat at 2 hr1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 31, Issue:6
Binding of steroids to the progestin and glucocorticoid receptors analyzed by correspondence analysis.
AID213396Glucocorticoid induced Tyrosine Aminotransferase activity relative to Dexamethasone1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 31, Issue:6
Binding of steroids to the progestin and glucocorticoid receptors analyzed by correspondence analysis.
AID1160935Partition coefficient, log D of the compound at pH 7.42014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-13, Volume: 57, Issue:21
Orally bioavailable 6-chloro-7-methoxy-4(1H)-quinolones efficacious against multiple stages of Plasmodium.
AID588211Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in humans2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID162613Relative binding affinity for progestin receptor of uterus of rabbit at 24 hr1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 31, Issue:6
Binding of steroids to the progestin and glucocorticoid receptors analyzed by correspondence analysis.
AID74373Relative binding affinity to glucocorticoid receptor on cytosol from hepatoma tissue cells at 24 hr1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 31, Issue:6
Binding of steroids to the progestin and glucocorticoid receptors analyzed by correspondence analysis.
AID588213Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in non-rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID27580Partition coefficient (logP)2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-27, Volume: 43, Issue:15
ElogPoct: a tool for lipophilicity determination in drug discovery.
AID51059Binding affinity to corticosteroid binding globulin1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-02, Volume: 41, Issue:14
Three-dimensional quantitative similarity-activity relationships (3D QSiAR) from SEAL similarity matrices.
AID51055Binding affinity to human CBG receptor (corticosteroid-binding globulins)2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-20, Volume: 47, Issue:11
Comparative molecular active site analysis (CoMASA). 1. An approach to rapid evaluation of 3D QSAR.
AID91224Antiinflammatory activity measured by using McKenzie-Stoughton human vasoconstrictor assay1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 29, Issue:11
Computer-aided studies of the structure-activity relationships between the structure of some steroids and their antiinflammatory activity.
AID188016Anti-inflammatory effect in rat granuloma assay, activity relative to hydrocortisone and hydrocortisone 21-acetate1983Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 26, Issue:3
Structure-activity relationships in the antiinflammatory steroids: a pattern-recognition approach.
AID361985Lipophilicity, log D of compound at pH 7.4 by microfluidic liquid-liquid extraction method2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-28, Volume: 51, Issue:16
Determination of log D via automated microfluidic liquid-liquid extraction.
AID29421Partition coefficient (logP) (HPLC)2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-27, Volume: 43, Issue:15
ElogPoct: a tool for lipophilicity determination in drug discovery.
AID588212Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID74374Relative binding affinity to glucocorticoid receptor on cytosol from hepatoma tissue cells at 4 hr1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 31, Issue:6
Binding of steroids to the progestin and glucocorticoid receptors analyzed by correspondence analysis.
AID51058Binding affinity towards corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG)2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-10, Volume: 46, Issue:8
Mapping property distributions of molecular surfaces: algorithm and evaluation of a novel 3D quantitative structure-activity relationship technique.
AID977602Inhibition of sodium fluorescein uptake in OATP1B3-transfected CHO cells at an equimolar substrate-inhibitor concentration of 10 uM2013Molecular pharmacology, Jun, Volume: 83, Issue:6
Structure-based identification of OATP1B1/3 inhibitors.
AID74376Relative binding affinity to glucocorticoid receptor on cytosol from liver at 4 hr1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 31, Issue:6
Binding of steroids to the progestin and glucocorticoid receptors analyzed by correspondence analysis.
AID346025Binding affinity to beta cyclodextrin2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-15, Volume: 17, Issue:2
Convenient QSAR model for predicting the complexation of structurally diverse compounds with beta-cyclodextrins.
AID90104Potency relative to fluocinolone 16,17-acetonide in the human vasoconstictor test1983Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 26, Issue:3
Structure-activity relationships in the antiinflammatory steroids: a pattern-recognition approach.
AID361986Lipophilicity, log D of compound at pH 7.4 by shake flask method2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-28, Volume: 51, Issue:16
Determination of log D via automated microfluidic liquid-liquid extraction.
AID19424Partition coefficient (logD7.4)2001Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-19, Volume: 44, Issue:15
ElogD(oct): a tool for lipophilicity determination in drug discovery. 2. Basic and neutral compounds.
AID74385Relative binding affinity for glucocorticoid receptor of rat thymus cytosol by displacement of [3H]dexamethasone compared to cortisol1982Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 25, Issue:6
Relative affinity of 17 alpha- and/or 21-esters and 17 alpha, 21-diesters of cortisol for a glucocorticoid receptor from rat thymocytes.
AID384955Intrinsic aqueous solubility at pH 10 by shake-flask method2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-22, Volume: 51, Issue:10
Molecular characteristics for solid-state limited solubility.
AID1159607Screen for inhibitors of RMI FANCM (MM2) intereaction2016Journal of biomolecular screening, Jul, Volume: 21, Issue:6
A High-Throughput Screening Strategy to Identify Protein-Protein Interaction Inhibitors That Block the Fanconi Anemia DNA Repair Pathway.
AID1159550Human Phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (6PGD) Inhibitor Screening2015Nature cell biology, Nov, Volume: 17, Issue:11
6-Phosphogluconate dehydrogenase links oxidative PPP, lipogenesis and tumour growth by inhibiting LKB1-AMPK signalling.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (492)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-1990305 (61.99)18.7374
1990's76 (15.45)18.2507
2000's59 (11.99)29.6817
2010's46 (9.35)24.3611
2020's6 (1.22)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 84.96

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index84.96 (24.57)
Research Supply Index6.36 (2.92)
Research Growth Index4.24 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index162.09 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.12 (0.95)

This Compound (84.96)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials42 (7.81%)5.53%
Reviews9 (1.67%)6.00%
Case Studies25 (4.65%)4.05%
Observational1 (0.19%)0.25%
Other461 (85.69%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (159)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
The Influence of Psychobiological Adversity to Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes [NCT02575001]207 participants (Actual)Observational2015-07-31Completed
A Phase I/II Pilot Study of Ifosfamide, Carboplatin and Etoposide Therapy (ICE) and SGN-30 (NSC# 731636, IND#) in Children With CD30+ Recurrent Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma [NCT00354107]Phase 1/Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Terminated
Single Centre, Subject and Observer Blinded, Placebo Controlled, Cross-over Study of the Effect of Oral Ibuprofen and Topical Hydrocortisone-21-acetate on Ultraviolet Radiation (UVR) Induced Pain and Inflammation in Healthy Volunteers [NCT01055249]Phase 124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Monocentric, Double-blind Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Cross-Sectional Clinical Trial of Hydrocortisone (10 and 30 mg/d) in Outpatients With Posttraumatic-Stress-Disorder (PTSD) [NCT01108146]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Imaging Corticotrophin-releasing Factor (CRF) X Nociceptive Opioid Peptide (NOP) Interactions in Cocaine Use Disorders (Aim 1) [NCT05008146]Early Phase 180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-31Recruiting
The Role of Stress Neuromodulators in Decision Making Under Risk [NCT04359147]167 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-01Completed
A Feasibility Trial of MLN4924 (Pevonedistat, TAK 924) Given in Combination With Azacitidine, Fludarabine, and Cytarabine, in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT03813147]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-17Active, not recruiting
Ultradian Subcutaneous Hydrocortisone Infusion in Addison Disease and Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia [NCT02096510]Phase 1/Phase 210 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-08-31Recruiting
Combination Corticosteroids + 5-aminosalicylic Acids Compared to Corticosteroids Alone in the Treatment of Moderate-severe Active Ulcerative Colitis. [NCT01941589]Phase 4149 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
A Phase 2 Study of Blinatumomab (NSC# 765986) in Combination With Nivolumab (NSC # 748726), a Checkpoint Inhibitor of PD-1, in B-ALL Patients Aged >/= 1 to < 31 Years Old With First Relapse [NCT04546399]Phase 2550 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-04Suspended(stopped due to Other - FDA Partial Clinical Hold)
Assessment of Application Order When Utilizing Locoid Lotion and Hylatopic Plus Cream in the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis [NCT02153762]41 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
A Phase II Study of Punctual, Cyclic, and Intensive Chemotherapy With Liposomal Cytarabine (Depocyt®) CNS Prophylaxis for Adults With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Lymphoblastic Lymphoma [NCT02043587]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Original investigator for the trial has left)
Treatment of Late Isolated Extramedullary Relapse From Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) (Initial CR1≥ 18 Months) [NCT00096135]168 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-30Completed
A Multi-center, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Adaptive Clinical Trial of Vitamin C, Thiamine and Steroids as Combination Therapy in Patients With Sepsis. [NCT03509350]Phase 3501 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-22Completed
Phase IV Study to Evaluate the Neuropsychological Effects of Hydrocortisone Substitution in Patients With Partial Adrenal Insufficiency After Traumatic Brain Injury or Subarachnoidal Haemorrhage [NCT01089075]Phase 432 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Insufficient recruitment of suitable patients.)
A Phase 3 Randomized Trial for Patients With De Novo AML Comparing Standard Therapy Including Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (GO) to CPX-351 With GO, and the Addition of the FLT3 Inhibitor Gilteritinib for Patients With FLT3 Mutations [NCT04293562]Phase 31,400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-21Recruiting
Effectiveness Evaluation of Mixed Gel of Hydrocortisone and Aluminium Phosphate Preventing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Postoperative Stenosis for Patients With Early Esophageal Cancer Invading More Than 2/3 Esophageal Perimeter [NCT03165344]66 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-10Completed
A Phase I-II Trial of DA-EPOCH-R Plus Ixazomib as Frontline Therapy for Patients With MYC-aberrant Lymphoid Malignancies: The DACIPHOR Regimen [NCT02481310]Phase 1/Phase 238 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-28Active, not recruiting
Effect of Modified-release Compared to Conventional Hydrocortisone on Fatigue, Measured by Ecological Momentary Assessments; a Pilot Study. [NCT02282150]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-10-31Enrolling by invitation
Randomized Cross-over Trial in Patients Treated With Both Insulin & Hydrocortisone [NCT05716607]16 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-30Not yet recruiting
Effectivness of Topical Tacrolimus 0.03% Monotherapy in Patients With Vitiligo: Arandomized Controlled Trial [NCT03358082]Phase 1/Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-10-01Recruiting
Open-label Crossover Trial to Investigate the Efficacy of Treatments in Apomorphine-induced Skin Reactions [NCT02230930]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-06-30Recruiting
A Phase III Randomized Trial Investigating Bortezomib (NSC# 681239) on a Modified Augmented BFM (ABFM) Backbone in Newly Diagnosed T-Lymphoblastic Leukemia (T-ALL) and T-Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (T-LLy) [NCT02112916]Phase 3847 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-04Active, not recruiting
International Phase 3 Trial in Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Ph+ALL) Testing Imatinib in Combination With Two Different Cytotoxic Chemotherapy Backbones [NCT03007147]Phase 3475 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-08-08Recruiting
Risk-Stratified Randomized Phase III Testing of Blinatumomab (NSC#765986) in First Relapse of Childhood B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL) [NCT02101853]Phase 3669 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-17Active, not recruiting
Single-center, Double-masked, Placebo-controlled Parallel-group Study of Pregnancy-related Hormones Estradiol and Medroxyprogesterone, in Conjunction With Hydrocortisone and Growth Hormone to Stimulate C-peptide Secretion in Women With T1DM [NCT01265017]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Insufficient funding)
Intensive Treatment For T-CELL Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Advanced Stage Lymphoblastic Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Pediatric Oncology Group Phase III Study [NCT01230983]Phase 3573 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-06-30Completed
Stress Hydrocortisone In Pediatric Septic Shock [NCT03401398]Phase 31,032 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-03-11Recruiting
Low Dose Corticosteroid Infusion in Vasoplegia After Cardiac Surgery (CORTIVAS-CS): a Prospective Randomized Double-blinded Clinical Trial [NCT04301479]Phase 3140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-03-31Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of Corticosteroid Therapy in Childhood Severe Sepsis (Steroids in Paediatric Sepsis, StePS) - a Randomised Pilot Study [NCT00732277]Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
ASSESSMENT OF ADRENAL FUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE HEPATITIS USING CONCENTRATION OF SERUM TOTAL CORTISOL, SERUM FREE AND SALIVARY CORTISOL [NCT02859584]111 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind Study Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Mesalazine With Hydrocortisone Sodium Succinate (100mg QD) Enema for 4-Week Treatment in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis (UC) [NCT03110198]Phase 4528 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-05-31Recruiting
The Effect of Cortisol Administration on Neural Correlates of Emotion in Depression [NCT02837432]Early Phase 1192 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Completed
Open Label Randomised 3 Period Crossover Study to Evaluate Bioavailability of Modified Release Hydrocortisone (HC) Under Fasting & Fed Conditions & Immediate Release HC Tablets Under Fasting Conditions in Dexamethasone-suppressed Subjects [NCT02408068]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
A Phase 1 Clinical Study to Investigate the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of MK-5684 in China Participants With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT06136598]Phase 114 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-25Not yet recruiting
Effect Of Hydrocortisone Phonophoresis Versus Iontophoresis In Patients With Subacromial Impingement Syndrome [NCT05919121]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-01Recruiting
A Feasibility Pilot and Phase II Study Of Chemoimmunotherapy With Epratuzumab (IND #12034) for Children With Relapsed CD22-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) [NCT00098839]Phase 1/Phase 2134 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-02-28Completed
A Pilot Study To Determine The Toxicity Of The Addition Of Rituximab To The Induction And Consolidation Phases And The Addition Of Rasburicase To The Reduction Phase In Children With Newly Diagnosed Advanced B-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma Treated With LMB/FAB T [NCT00057811]Phase 297 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-30Completed
Randomized, Embedded, Multifactorial Adaptive Platform Trial for Community- Acquired Pneumonia [NCT02735707]Phase 310,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-04-11Recruiting
Impact of Obesity on the Pharmacokinetics of Anticancer Therapy in Children With High Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) [NCT00900445]0 participants (Actual)Observational2008-03-24Withdrawn
A Phase III Randomized Trial for Evaluating Second Line Hormonal Therapy (Ketoconazole/Hydrocortisone) Versus Paclitaxel/Estramustine Combination Chemotherapy on Progression Free Survival in Asymptomatic Patients With a Rising PSA After Hormonal Therapy f [NCT00027859]Phase 30 participants Interventional2003-10-08Completed
A Randomized, Dose-Ranging, Double Blind Study of Lidocaine Hydrochloride and/or Hydrocortisone Acetate (Alone or in Combination) in the 14-Day Twice-Daily Treatment of Grade I or II Hemorrhoids [NCT02689856]Phase 2211 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Completed
A Comparative Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus Versus Hydrocortisone in Treatment of Children With Atopic Dermatitis [NCT05324618]Phase 4200 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-05-15Completed
Randomized, Open Label, Crossover Study Pharmacokinetics and Bioavailability of Hydrocortisone Acetate Administered as a Suppository With the Sephure® Rectal Suppository Applicator Compared With Cortenema in Healthy Subjects [NCT02671058]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
A Phase II Pilot Trial of Bortezomib (PS-341, Velcade) in Combination With Intensive Re-Induction Therapy for Children With Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) and Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (LL) [NCT00873093]Phase 2148 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
An Open-label, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial of the Use of Reduced Duration Versus Standard Duration Steroid Replacement Therapy for Acute Adrenal Insufficiency in Patients With Septic Shock [NCT00842933]Phase 432 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Unable to meet enrollment goal prior to PI transfer)
DFCI ALL Adult Consortium Protocol: Adult ALL Trial [NCT01005758]Phase 2180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-01-31Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Phase 3 Interim Response Adapted Trial Comparing Standard Therapy With Immuno-oncology Therapy for Children and Adults With Newly Diagnosed Stage I and II Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT05675410]Phase 31,875 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-11Recruiting
A Phase 3 Trial Investigating Blinatumomab (NSC# 765986) in Combination With Chemotherapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Standard Risk or Down Syndrome B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL) and the Treatment of Patients With Localized B-Lymphoblastic Lymphom [NCT03914625]Phase 36,720 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-03Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Phase 3 Study of Chronocort Compared With Immediate-Release Hydrocortisone Replacement Therapy in Participants Aged 16 Years and Over With Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia [NCT05063994]Phase 3150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-13Active, not recruiting
Hair Cortisol and the Risk of Acute Myocardial Infarction [NCT00682487]120 participants (Actual)Observational2008-06-30Completed
Pilot Study of Chinese Medicine Medicated Bath as Complementary Medicine for Mild to Moderate Plaque -Type Psoriasis Patient. [NCT04117919]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-05Recruiting
RESCUE - Effect of Supplemental Hydrocortisone During Stress in Prednisolone-induced Adrenal Insufficiency; A Multicentre, Randomised, Double Blinded, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial on Health-related Quality of Life in Patients With Polymyalgia Rheumat [NCT05435781]Phase 4250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-07Recruiting
A Double Blind, Multicentre, Randomised, Parallel Group Study to Demonstrate the Equivalence of the Response to Vaccination of a Tacrolimus Ointment Regimen to a Steroid Ointment Regimen in Children With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis [NCT00801957]Phase 2260 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-03-31Completed
Double Blinded, Randomized Trial, Comparing Intravenous Bolus of 50 mg of Hydrocortisone Every 6 Hours for 7 Days With a Continuous Infusion of 300 mg Per Day of Hydrocortisone 300-mg Group During 5 Days in the Treatment of Septic Shock. [NCT02768740]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
A Phase I Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability and Biological Activity of EZN-3042, a Survivin mRNA Antagonist, Administered With Re-induction Chemotherapy in Children With Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) [NCT01186328]Phase 16 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-24Terminated(stopped due to Enzon Pharmaceuticals decided to end its development of EZN-3042.)
A Phase I, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability Profile of Topical Cream SNG100 for 14 Days of Treatment in Moderate Atopic Dermatitis Subjects. [NCT04615962]Phase 166 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-01Not yet recruiting
Interval Bolus Delivery of Subcutaneous Hydrocortisone Via Infusion Pump in Children With Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia [NCT03718234]Phase 111 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-01Completed
Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis With Concurrent Altabax® and Topical Low-Potency Corticosteroids vs. Low-Potency Corticosteroid Mono-therapy [NCT00871208]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Funding withdrawn)
Phase III Study of Hydrocortisone in Patients With Severe H1N1 Related Pneumonia [NCT01014364]Phase 340 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Terminated(stopped due to the H1N1 pandemic is now over, and fewer cases than expected were observed)
Intensified Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy (Dasatinib NSC# 732517) in Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) [NCT00720109]Phase 2/Phase 363 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-14Completed
Glucocorticoid Treatment in Addison's Disease [NCT01063569]Phase 2/Phase 333 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
Phase II Trial to Assess the Activity of Ketoconazole Plus Lenalidomide in Patients With Prostate Cancer Progressive After Androgen Deprivation [NCT00460031]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-01Completed
Effect of Estrogen on the Stress Response for Postmenopausal Women [NCT00220454]Phase 240 participants Interventional2002-12-31Completed
Calcipotriol Plus Hydrocortisone in Psoriasis Vulgaris on the Face and on the Intertriginous Areas [NCT00691002]Phase 31,245 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
Withholding Hydrocortisone vs Routine Use of Hydrocortisone During Peri-operation in Pituitary Adenoma Patients With Intact Hypothalamus-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis: Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess Safety and Complications [NCT04621565]436 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-01Recruiting
[NCT01608945]60 participants (Actual)Observational2008-04-30Suspended
Adherence to Topical Hydrocortisone 17-butyrate 0.1% (Locoid®) Using Different Vehicles in Adults With Atopic Dermatitis [NCT00693693]Phase 426 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
A Phase I/II Study of Oral Calcitriol in Combination With Ketoconazole in Androgen Independent Prostate Cancer [NCT00536991]Phase 1/Phase 251 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Terminated(stopped due to difficult to recruit)
A Phase 2 Study of SNDX-5613 in Combination With Chemotherapy for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory KMT2A-Rearranged Infant Leukemia [NCT05761171]Phase 278 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-20Recruiting
A Phase I Study of Venetoclax in Combination With Cytotoxic Chemotherapy, Including Calaspargase Pegol, for Children, Adolescents and Young Adults With High-Risk Hematologic Malignancies [NCT05292664]Phase 192 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-29Recruiting
A Phase 1 Study Of Palbociclib (IND#141416), A CDK 4/6 Inhibitor, In Combination With Chemotherapy In Children With Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Or Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (LL) [NCT03792256]Phase 115 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-04-11Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Anucort HC TM (Hydrocortisone Acetate) 25mg Rectal Suppositories in the Treatment of Symptomatic Internal Hemorrhoids [NCT01913158]Phase 2150 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
Hemodynamic and Biological Effects of Fludrocortisone and Hydrocortisone, in Healthy Volunteers With Aldosterone Induced Suppression [NCT00673270]Phase 1/Phase 213 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Terminated
A Randomized Pilot Trial of a Steroid-free Immunosuppressant Regimen in Pediatric Liver Transplantation [NCT00694408]Phase 315 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Study terminated due to withdrawal from market of Daclizumab)
Gleevec (Imatinib) Plus Multi-Agent Chemotherapy For Newly-Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [NCT00618501]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
Treatment of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Children [NCT00400946]Phase 3800 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
International Collaborative Treatment Protocol for Infants Under One Year With Acute Lymphoblastic or Biphenotypic Leukemia [NCT00550992]445 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-01-31Recruiting
A Groupwide Pilot Study to Test the Tolerability and Biologic Activity of the Addition of Azacitidine (NSC# 102816) to Chemotherapy in Infants With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) and KMT2A (MLL) Gene Rearrangement [NCT02828358]Phase 278 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-01Active, not recruiting
A Phase III Study of Risk Directed Therapy for Infants With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL): Randomization of Highest Risk Infants to Intensive Chemotherapy +/- FLT3 Inhibition (CEP-701, Lestaurtinib; NSC#617807) [NCT00557193]Phase 3218 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-15Active, not recruiting
Early Prevention of Broncho-pulmonary Dysplasia and Neonatal Mortality in Very Preterm Infants Using Low Dose of Hydrocortisone: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT00623740]Phase 3523 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
A PedAL/EuPAL Phase 1/2 Trial of IMGN632 in Pediatric Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Leukemia [NCT05320380]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-08-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Withdrawn per CS0150757)
Effect of Oral Ketoconazole on the Pharmacokinetics of Oral Dexamethasone and Oral Hydrocortisone in Patients With Androgen Independent Prostate Cancer [NCT00559481]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Withdrawn due to low accrual)
An Open-label, Randomized, Titration-blinded, Phase III Study of Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability Of Chronocort® Compared With Standard Glucocorticoid REeplacement Therapy in the Treatment of Participants Aged 16 Years and Over With Congenital Adrenal Hy [NCT03532022]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-04Withdrawn(stopped due to Protocol re-design required following EU Phase III results)
The Effects of Epinephrine and Cortisol on Emotion in Depression [NCT04148261]Early Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Principal Investigator left lab before study start)
A RANDOMIZED PHASE III TRIAL COMPARING DEXAMETHASONE WITH PREDNISONE IN INDUCTION TREATMENT AND BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION WITH INTENSIVE MAINTENANCE TREATMENT IN ADOLESCENT AND ADULT ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA (ALL-4) [NCT00002700]Phase 3392 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1995-08-31Completed
A PHASE III TWO-ARM RANDOMIZED STUDY COMPARING ANTIANDROGEN WITHDRAWAL ALONE VERSUS ANTIANDROGEN WITHDRAWAL COMBINED WITH KETOCONAZOLE AND HYDROCORTISON IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED PROSTAGE CANCER [NCT00002760]Phase 3260 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-08-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Compound 506U78 in Patients With Refractory T-Cell Malignancies-POG/CCG Intergroup Study [NCT00002970]Phase 2148 participants (Actual)Interventional1997-06-30Completed
Chemotherapy (CT) Followed by Donor Lymphocyte Infusion (DLI) Plus Interleukin 2 (IL-2) for Patients With Relapse Acute Myeloid or Lymphoid Leukemia After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Transplant [NCT00005802]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants Interventional1999-06-30Completed
Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis [NCT00334672]Phase 3288 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-03-31Active, not recruiting
Influence of Hydrocortisone on Humoral and Cellular Immunologic Markers in High Risk Patients After Cardiac Surgery [NCT00490828]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
Evaluation of the Antipruritic Effect of Elidel (Pimecrolimus) in Non-atopic Pruritic Disease [NCT00507832]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
A Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Nivolumab (NSC# 748726) in Combination With Chemo-Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Primary Mediastinal B-Cell Lymphoma [NCT04759586]Phase 3244 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-05Recruiting
The Safety of Proctofoam-HC in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy [NCT00405288]408 participants (Actual)Observational2006-11-30Completed
Phase III of Recombinant Human Activated Protein C and Low Dose of Hydrocortisone and Fludrocortisone in Adult Septic Shock [NCT00625209]Phase 31,241 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
A, Randomised, Controlled, Two-armed, Two-period Cross-over, Multi-centre Phase II/III Study to Assess the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Once-daily Oral Modified-release Hydrocortisone in Patients With Adrenal Insufficiency [NCT00915343]Phase 2/Phase 364 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-21Completed
Randomized Comparisons of Oral Mercaptopurine vs Oral Thioguanine and IT Methotrexate vs ITT for Standard Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [NCT00002744]Phase 31,970 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-05-31Completed
Induction Intensification in Infant ALL: A Children's Oncology Group Study [NCT00002756]Phase 2221 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-06-30Completed
"A Phase II Trial of Early Medical Adrenalectomy for D0.5 Prostate Cancer" [NCT00006371]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-05-31Terminated(stopped due to low accrual)
A Randomized Study of Two Methods of CNS Prophylaxis in Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [NCT00019409]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-10-31Withdrawn
Intensive Induction Therapy for Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Who Experience a Bone Marrow Relapse [NCT00049569]126 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2003-01-31Completed
The Effect of Glucocorticoid Pre-Treatment on the Systemic Cytokine Response to Endotoxin in Human Volunteers [NCT00396344]36 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
Corticosteroid Therapy of Septic Shock - Corticus. A Multi-National, Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study [NCT00147004]Phase 3500 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-03-31Completed
A Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Two-Way Cross-Over, Randomised, Phase II Study of Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Modified-Release Hydrocortisones: Chronocort® Versus Plenadren®, in Adrenal Insufficiency [NCT05222152]Phase 267 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-23Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of 25 mg Hydrocortisone Acetate Suppositories in the Treatment of Symptomatic Internal Hemorrhoids. [NCT03335774]Phase 2103 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-12Completed
Comparative Study Between Hydrocortisone and Mannitol in Treatment of Postdural Puncture Headache: a Randomized Double-blind Study [NCT02760862]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Completed
A Phase III Study of Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Chronocort® Compared With Standard Glucocorticoid Replacement Therapy in the Treatment of Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia [NCT02716818]Phase 3122 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-22Completed
An Open Label Pilot Study to Investigate the Effects of Two Preparations of Hydrocortisone (Hydrocortisone 100mg/ml and Solu-Cortef) Injected Intramuscularly Into the Deltoid and Upper Thigh Muscle During the State of Hypocortisolaemia [NCT05350020]Phase 48 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-14Recruiting
Phase II Trial to Assess the Activity of Ketoconazole Plus GM-CSF in Patients With Prostate Cancer Progressive After Androgen Deprivation [NCT00309894]Phase 249 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
A Phase III Randomized Trial for Newly Diagnosed High Risk B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL) Including a Stratum Evaluating Dasatinib (NSC#732517) in Patients With Ph-like Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) Sensitive Mutations [NCT02883049]Phase 35,937 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Active, not recruiting
Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia: Innovative Once Daily Dual Release Hydrocortisone Treatment [NCT03760835]Phase 4150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-08-11Recruiting
Effect of Intravenous Hydrocortison on Post-ischemic Brachial Artery Dilation and on Thenar Oxygen Saturation in Adult Septic Shock. A Human Placebo-controlled Randomized Study. [NCT01817153]Phase 2/Phase 310 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-05Terminated(stopped due to not enough recruitment)
Continuous Subcutaneous Hydrocortisone Infusion In Addison's Disease and Type 1 Diabetes [NCT01840189]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Therapy for Pediatric Relapsed or Refractory Precursor B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Lymphoma [NCT01700946]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-15Completed
FAB LMB 96 -- Treatment of Mature B-CELL Lymphoma/Leukemia: A SFOP LMB 96/CCG 5961/UKCCSG NHL 9600 Cooperative Study [NCT00002757]Phase 31,148 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-06-30Completed
A Phase I Trial of Temsirolimus (CCI-779, Pfizer, Inc.) in Combination With Etoposide and Cyclophosphamide in Children With Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma [NCT01614197]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-03Completed
Low-dose Cortisol in Chronic Posttraumatic Stress Disorder [NCT00362661]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Recruitment: Insufficient number of patients eligible for enrollment)
Prevalence of Neuroendocrine Dysfunction in the Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Bypass Patient [NCT00850720]3 participants (Actual)Observational2009-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Inability to recruit / logistic problems.)
HIGH INTENSITY, BRIEF DURATION CHEMOTHERAPY FOR DIFFUSE SMALL NONCLEAVED CELL LYMPHOMA AND THE L-3 SUBTYPE OF ALL: A PILOT STUDY OF A MULTIDRUG REGIMEN [NCT00002494]Phase 2134 participants (Actual)Interventional1992-05-31Completed
TREATMENT OF ISOLATED CNS RELAPSE OF ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA -- A PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY GROUP-WIDE PHASE II STUDY [NCT00002704]Phase 2156 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-01-31Completed
Medical Research Council Working Party on Leukaemia in Childhood Acute Myeloid Leukaemia Trial 12 [NCT00003436]Phase 32,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1998-07-31Completed
A Phase 2, Open Label, Crossover Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study to Compare Chronocort Versus Cortef in Patients With CAH [NCT00519818]Phase 1/Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
ALL Adult Consortium Trial: Adult ALL Trial [NCT00476190]Phase 2112 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-04-30Active, not recruiting
Corticosteroid Intralesional Injection as an Alternative Treatment in Oral Pyogenic Granuloma in the Esthetic Zone [NCT05534334]Phase 2/Phase 330 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-01Recruiting
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Low Dose and High Dose Steroids in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery [NCT01559675]121 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
An Open Label, Partially Randomised, Single Dose, Crossover Study to Evaluate the PK, Oral Bioavailability and Relationship to Metabolic Parameters of Hydrocortisone and Infacort® in Healthy Adult Male Volunteers. [NCT01960530]Phase 114 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
Phase 3 Study of Corticotherapy (Hydrocortisone Alone Versus Hydrocortisone Plus Fludrocortisone) Versus Corticotherapy Plus Intensive Insulin Therapy for Septic Shock [NCT00320099]Phase 3508 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
AUTOLOGOUS, ALLOGENEIC, OR SYNGENEIC BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION IN HODGKIN'S DISEASE, NON-HODGKIN'S LYMPHOMA, AND MULTIPLE MYELOMA [NCT00002552]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1993-10-31Completed
A PHASE III STUDY IN CHILDREN WITH UNTREATED ACUTE MYELOGENOUS LEUKEMIA (AML) OR MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROME (MDS) [NCT00002798]Phase 3880 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-08-31Completed
EXTRAMEDULLARY RELAPSE AND OCCULT BONE MARROW INVOLVEMENT IN CHILDHOOD ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA: A PHASE III GROUP-WIDE STUDY [NCT00002816]Phase 3120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1996-12-31Completed
Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Infants Less Than 1 Year of Age. [NCT00002785]Phase 20 participants Interventional1996-07-31Completed
The Value of Dexamethasone Versus Prednisolone During Induction and Maintenance Therapy of Prolonged Versus Conventional Duration of L-Asparaginase Therapy During Consolidation and Late Intensification, and of Corticosteroid + VCR Pulses During Maintenanc [NCT00003728]Phase 31,500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1998-12-31Active, not recruiting
PHASE III TRIAL OF ORCHIECTOMY/LHRH ANALOG + FLUTAMIDE + SURAMIN + HYDROCORTISONE VS ORCHIECTOMY/LHRH ANALOG + FLUTAMIDE IN PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC PROSTATE CANCER [NCT00002881]Phase 30 participants Interventional1996-10-31Completed
A Two-Part, Phase II Randomized Trial to Explore Topical Spironolactone to Prevent/Attenuate Rash From Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors (Panitumumab and Cetuximab) in Advanced Cancer Patients [NCT01867294]Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Completed
Phase II Trial of Intensive, Short-Course Combination Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Patients With Poor-Risk Nonlymphoblastic Lymphoma and Acute B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia and in Patients With Recurrent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00002471]Phase 20 participants Interventional1990-02-28Completed
Evaluation of Suramin in Advanced Adrenal Cortical Carcinoma, Phase II [NCT00002921]Phase 213 participants (Actual)Interventional1997-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Permanently Closed Due to Lack of Accrual)
HYdrocortisone and VAsopressin in Post-REsuscitation Syndrome [NCT04591990]Phase 3380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-27Recruiting
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Salvage Therapy for Patients in First Relapse or Who Fail to Achieve an Initial Remission or Who Develop AML as a Second Malignant Neoplasm [NCT00002805]Phase 2115 participants (Actual)Interventional1997-08-31Completed
HIGH INTENSITY, BRIEF DURATION CHEMOTHERAPY FOR RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY ALL: A PHASE II STUDY OF A MULTIDRUG REGIMEN [NCT00002865]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional1995-04-30Completed
The Use of Perioperative Steroids in Patients Undergoing Transsphenoidal Resection of Pituitary Tumors or Cysts [NCT02084134]43 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
An Open-label, Single-arm, Single-center Study Evaluating the Hemodynamic Response to Angiotensin-II When Used as the Second Vasopressor Agent for Septic Shock [NCT06122987]Phase 450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-31Not yet recruiting
A Phase II Study of Intrathecal and Systemic Chemotherapy With Radiation Therapy for Children With Central Nervous System Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumor (AT/RT) Tumor [NCT00084838]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-02-28Completed
Pharmacokinetics of Hydrocortisone After Subcutaneous Administration Compared With Intramuscular Injection in Chronic Adrenal Insufficiency [NCT01450930]Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation of Positively Selected CD34+ Cells and Defined Inoculum of T Cells From Related Haploidentical Donors for Older Patients With Indolent Hematologic Malignancies [NCT00185692]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-08-31Completed
3-Arm Randomized Placebo Controlled Double Blind Phase 3 Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Once-Daily and Twice-Daily Hydrocortisone Acetate 90 mg Suppository Administered With a Sephure Applicator in Subjects With Ulcerative Colitis [NCT04469686]Phase 3618 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-10Recruiting
A Phase 3 Study Comparing an Ointment Containing Calcipotriol 25 mcg/g Plus Hydrocortisone 10 mg g With Tacalcitol 4 mcg/g Ointment and the Ointment Vehicle Alone, All Applied Once Daily in the Treatment of Psoriasis Vulgaris on the Face and on the Intert [NCT00640822]Phase 3782 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
Effect of Steroids Given Over 24 Hours on Cytokine Release, Urinary Desmosine Level and Thrombogenic Markers in Patients Undergoing Unilateral Total Hip Replacement [NCT01782859]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
A Randomized International Phase 3 Trial of Imatinib and Chemotherapy With or Without Blinatumomab in Patients With Newly-Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive or Philadelphia Chromosome-Like ABL-Class B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [NCT06124157]Phase 3680 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-22Not yet recruiting
A Phase 3 Trial of Androgen Ablation Alone vs. Chemo/Hormonal Therapy as Initial Treatment of Unresectable/Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate [NCT00002855]Phase 3306 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-08-31Completed
Standard Chemotherapy (CHOP Regimen) Versus Sequential High-Dose Chemotherapy With Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas and Poor Prognostic Factors: A Randomized Phase III Study (MISTRAL) [NCT00003215]Phase 3400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1997-04-30Completed
Treatment of Children With Down Syndrome (DS) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS), and Transient Myeloproliferative Disorder (TMD): A Phase III Group-Wide Study [NCT00003593]Phase 3254 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-06-30Completed
Prospective Phase II Study of a High Dose, Short Course Regimen (R-CODOX-M/IVAC) Including CNS Penetration and Intensive IT Prophylaxis in HIV-Associated Burkitt's and Atypical Burkitt's Lymphoma [NCT00392834]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
A Phase 3 Randomized Trial of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin (NSC#: 772518) for Newly Diagnosed High-Risk B-ALL; Risk-Adapted Post-Induction Therapy for High-Risk B-ALL, Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemia, and Disseminated B-LLy [NCT03959085]Phase 34,772 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-31Recruiting
A Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Centre Trial on the Effects of Dual-release Hydrocortisone Preparations Versus Conventional Glucocorticoid Replacement Therapy in Patients Affected by Primary and Secondary Adrenal Insufficiency. DREAM Trial. [NCT02277587]Phase 489 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Completed
The Intra-Procedural Cortisol Assay During Adrenal Vein Sampling: Rationale andDesign of A Randomized Study (I-PADUA) [NCT03449797]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-04-01Not yet recruiting
International Protocol for the Treatment of Childhood Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma [NCT00006455]Phase 3885 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-11-26Completed
Hormonal Mechanisms of Sleep Restriction [NCT02256865]Early Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Completed
Difference in Mortality and Evolution in Septic Patients Treated With Vitamin C, Tiamine, Cyanocobalamine, Pyridoxine and Hydrocortisone Treated at the ICU of General Hospital Zone 11 IMSS Piedras Negras Coahuila. [NCT04197115]Phase 319 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-01Completed
Effects of Glucocorticoid Combined With Vitamin C and Vitamin B1 Versus Hydrocortisone Alone on Microcirculation in Severe Septic Shock [NCT03821714]22 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-01Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00057811 (4) [back to overview]Response Rate
NCT00057811 (4) [back to overview]Minimal Residual Disease
NCT00057811 (4) [back to overview]Grade ≥ 3 Stomatitis
NCT00057811 (4) [back to overview]Toxic Death
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Constitutional Events
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Cardiovascular Events
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Blood/Bone Marrow Events
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Auditory/Hearing Events
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Allergy/Immunology
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]2-yr Overall Survival
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Pre-Radiation Therapy Chemotherapeutic Response
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3/4 Events
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Renal/Genitourinary Events
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Pulmonary Events
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Pain Events
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Neurology Events
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Muscloskeletal Events
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Metabolic/Laboratory Events
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Infection/Febrile Neutropenia Events
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Hepatic Events
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Hemorrhage Events
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Gastrointestinal Events
NCT00084838 (19) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Dermatology Events
NCT00096135 (1) [back to overview]Event-free Survival
NCT00098839 (4) [back to overview]Event-free Survival Rate
NCT00098839 (4) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics
NCT00098839 (4) [back to overview]Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) < 0.01%
NCT00098839 (4) [back to overview]Remission Re-induction (CR2) Rate
NCT00185692 (2) [back to overview]Engraftment of Haploidentical CD34+ Selected Blood Stem Cells in Older Patients or Those With Medical Co-morbidities Following Total Lymphoid Irradiation and Antithymocyte Globulin Transplant Conditioning
NCT00185692 (2) [back to overview]Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Grade 2-4 Risk From Time of Transplant Until Day 90 Post-transplant
NCT00354107 (1) [back to overview]Response
NCT00392834 (1) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) at 1 Year
NCT00400946 (10) [back to overview]Induction Serum Asparaginase Activity Level
NCT00400946 (10) [back to overview]5-Year Disease-Free Survival
NCT00400946 (10) [back to overview]5-Year Disease-Free Survival by Bone Marrow Day 18 Status
NCT00400946 (10) [back to overview]5-year Disease-Free Survival by CNS Directed Treatment Group
NCT00400946 (10) [back to overview]Asparaginase-Related Toxicity Rate
NCT00400946 (10) [back to overview]Induction Infection Toxicity Rate
NCT00400946 (10) [back to overview]Post-Induction Therapeutic Nadir Serum Asparaginase Activity Rate
NCT00400946 (10) [back to overview]5-Year Disease-Free Survival by MRD Day 32 Status
NCT00400946 (10) [back to overview]Induction Therapeutic Nadir Serum Asparaginase Activity Rate
NCT00400946 (10) [back to overview]Post-Induction Nadir Serum Asparaginase Activity Level
NCT00405288 (12) [back to overview]Skin Conditions in Neonatal Period
NCT00405288 (12) [back to overview]Respiratory Neonatal Health Concerns
NCT00405288 (12) [back to overview]Prematurity
NCT00405288 (12) [back to overview]Birth-weight
NCT00405288 (12) [back to overview]Cardiovascular Neonatal Health Concerns in the First Two Weeks After Birth
NCT00405288 (12) [back to overview]Gestational Age at Delivery
NCT00405288 (12) [back to overview]Fetal Distress
NCT00405288 (12) [back to overview]Low Birth Weight at Birth
NCT00405288 (12) [back to overview]Mode of Delivery
NCT00405288 (12) [back to overview]Other Neonatal Health Concerns
NCT00405288 (12) [back to overview]Neonatal Health
NCT00405288 (12) [back to overview]Neonatal Health Concerns-infections
NCT00460031 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients With a Partial Response, Progressive Disease, or Stable Disease Based on Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) or Measurable Disease
NCT00460031 (5) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT00460031 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Grade 3 and 4 Toxicity as Assessed by NCI CTCAE v3.0
NCT00460031 (5) [back to overview]Change in Immune Response From Baseline
NCT00460031 (5) [back to overview]Ratio of Change in Immune Response From Baseline
NCT00519818 (2) [back to overview]17 Hydroxyprogesterone at 08.00 Hours
NCT00519818 (2) [back to overview]Chronocort vs. Cortef Cortisol Concentrations (AUC Over 24 Hours - Time Points 0,.5,1,1.5,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,10,10.5,11, 11.5,12,13,15,17,17.5,18,18.5,19,20,22,24 Post Dose).
NCT00536991 (4) [back to overview]PSA Response Rate
NCT00536991 (4) [back to overview]Objective Tumor Response, Assessed by RECIST
NCT00536991 (4) [back to overview]Incidence of Toxicity Graded According to the National Cancer Institute CTC Version 3.0
NCT00536991 (4) [back to overview]Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)
NCT00557193 (10) [back to overview]Percent Probability of Event Free Survival (EFS) by MRD Status and Treatment Arm
NCT00557193 (10) [back to overview]Describe FLT3 Protein Expression as a Molecular Mechanism of Primary Resistance to Lestaurtinib in Leukemic Blasts
NCT00557193 (10) [back to overview]Describe FLT3 Protein Expression as a Molecular Mechanism of Acquired Resistance to Lestaurtinib in Leukemic Blasts
NCT00557193 (10) [back to overview]Describe in Vitro Sensitivity as a Molecular Mechanism of Primary Resistance to Lestaurtinib in Leukemic Blasts
NCT00557193 (10) [back to overview]Percent Probability for Event-free Survival (EFS) of MLL-R Infants Treated With Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Lestaurtinib at DL2
NCT00557193 (10) [back to overview]Pharmacodynamics PIA Levels in Infants Given Lestaurtinib at DL2 in Combination With Chemotherapy
NCT00557193 (10) [back to overview]Percent Probability for Event-free Survival (EFS) for Patients on Arm A
NCT00557193 (10) [back to overview]Percent Probability for Event-free Survival (EFS) for Patients on Arm C at Dose Level 2 (DL2)
NCT00557193 (10) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Experienced Lestaurtinib-related Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)
NCT00557193 (10) [back to overview]Describe in Vitro Sensitivity as a Molecular Mechanism of Acquired Resistance to Lestaurtinib in Leukemic Blasts
NCT00640822 (1) [back to overview]Subjects With Controlled Disease According to the Investigator Assessment of the Face at Week 8
NCT00691002 (5) [back to overview]"Participants With Success According to Total Sign Score (TSS) of the Face at Week 8 (Visit 6) in the Double-blind Phase"
NCT00691002 (5) [back to overview]"Participants With Controlled Disease According to the Investigator's Global Assessment(IGA) of Disease Severity of the Face at Week 8 (Visit 6) in the Double-blind Phase"
NCT00691002 (5) [back to overview]"Participants With Controlled Disease According to the IGA of Disease Severity of the Intertriginous Areas at Week 8 (Visit 6) in the Double-blind Phase"
NCT00691002 (5) [back to overview]"Participants With Controlled Disease According to the IGA of Disease Severity of the Face at Week 4 (Visit 4) in the Double-blind Phase"
NCT00691002 (5) [back to overview]"Participants With Success According to Total Sign Score of the Intertriginous Areas at Week 8 (Visit 6) in the Double-blind Phase"
NCT00693693 (1) [back to overview]Adherence to Locoid
NCT00720109 (5) [back to overview]Overall EFS Rate for the Combined Cohort of Standard- and High-Risk Patients (Who Receive the Final Chosen Dose of Dasatinib)
NCT00720109 (5) [back to overview]Percent of Patients MRD Positive (MRD > 0.01%) at End of Consolidation
NCT00720109 (5) [back to overview]Contribution of Dasatinib on Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) After Induction Therapy
NCT00720109 (5) [back to overview]Event-Free Survival (EFS) of Patients With Standard-risk Disease Treated With Dasatinib in Combination With Intensified Chemotherapy
NCT00720109 (5) [back to overview]Feasibility and Toxicity of an Intensified Chemotherapeutic Regimen Incorporating Dasatinib for Treatment of Children and Adolescents With Ph+ ALL Assessed by Examining Adverse Events
NCT00873093 (7) [back to overview]Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) < 0.01% at End Block 2
NCT00873093 (7) [back to overview]Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) < 0.01% at End Block 1
NCT00873093 (7) [back to overview]Toxic Death Rate
NCT00873093 (7) [back to overview]Severe Adverse Events (SAE) Rate.
NCT00873093 (7) [back to overview]Second Complete Remission Rate at the End of Block 1 Reinduction Chemotherapy
NCT00873093 (7) [back to overview]Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) < 0.01% at End Block 3
NCT00873093 (7) [back to overview]Event Free Survival
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Percentage (%) of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Tolerability Questionnaire at Month 6, Assessed by Patient and Investigator - Part B
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Average Concentration of S-cortisol During the Dosing Interval at Steady State (Css,av) in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Zero to 24 Hours Adjusted by Dose (AUC0-24h/Dose) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 6 Months in Diurnal Fatigue Questionnaire for Day Average- Part B
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Zero to 4 Hours Adjusted by Dose (AUC0-4h/Dose) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Zero to 10 Hours Adjusted by Dose (AUC0-10h/Dose) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Average Concentration of S-cortisol During the Dosing Interval at Steady State Adjusted by Dose (Css,av/Dose) in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Diurnal Fatigue Questionnaire for Day Average of Once Daily Therapy - Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 6 Months in Quality of Life (QoL) Assessed by Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS) Total Score - Part B
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 6 Months in Quality of Life (QoL) Assessed by Psychological General Well Being (PGWB) Total Scores- Part B
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Comparison of Quality of Life (QoL) Assessed by Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS) Total Score Between Once Daily and Thrice Daily Therapy - Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Comparison of Quality of Life (QoL) Assessed by Psychological General Well Being (PGWB) Total Scores Between Once Daily and Thrice Daily Therapy- Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Comparison on 24-hour Urinary Free Cortisol Between Once Daily and Thrice Daily Therapy-Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Comparison on Participant Compliance Between Once Daily and Thrice Daily Therapy - Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Concentration at 6 Hours (C6h) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Concentration at 7 Hours (C7h) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Drug Concentration Half-Life From 5 to 14 Hours (t1/2[5-14h]) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Drug Concentration Half-Life From 5 to 24 Hours (t1/2[5-24h]) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]First Detectable Concentration (Cfirst) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]First Detectable Concentration Adjusted by Dose (Cfirst/Dose) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Maximal Concentration (Cmax1) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Maximal Concentration (Cmax2) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Maximal Concentration Adjusted by Dose (Cmax1/Dose) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Participant Compliance- Part B
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Zero to 24 Hours (AUC0-24h) of Total S-cortisol in Plasma After Multiple Doses During Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Accumulation Ratio (Rac) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration Time Curve During a Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUCtau) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration Time Curve During a Dosing Interval at Steady State Adjusted by Dose (AUCtau/Dose) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 6 Months in Quality of Life (QoL) Assessed by Short Form-36 Survey (SF-36) For Physical and Mental Component Score - Part B
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Percentage (%) of Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) Extrapolation of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Percentage (%) of Fluctuation in Concentrations of S-cortisol at Steady State in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Time to First Detectable Concentration (Tfirst) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Time to First Detectable Concentration Adjusted by Dose (Tfirst/Dose) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Time to Peak Plasma Concentration (Tmax1) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Time to Peak Plasma Concentration (Tmax2) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Time to Reach a Concentration of 200 Nanometers (nM) (T200) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) Between Specified Timepoints of Total S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Comparison of Overall Patient Tolerability Score Between Once Daily and Thrice Daily Therapy, Assessed by Patient and Investigator - Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Comparison of Quality of Life (QoL) Assessed by Short Form-36 Survey (SF-36) For Physical and Mental Component Score Between Once Daily and Thrice Daily Therapy- Part A
NCT00915343 (40) [back to overview]Comparison on Participant Preference by Questionnaire Between Once Daily and Thrice Daily Therapy-Part A
NCT01559675 (1) [back to overview]Orthostatic Hypotension
NCT01614197 (1) [back to overview]Minimum Residual Disease (MRD) Levels Present at End of Cycle 1 Therapy in Patients
NCT01700946 (4) [back to overview]3-year Event-free Survival Rates in Patients With Relapsed ALL
NCT01700946 (4) [back to overview]3-year Overall Survival Rate of Patients With Relapsed ALL
NCT01700946 (4) [back to overview]Median CD20 Expression Levels
NCT01700946 (4) [back to overview]Mean of CD20 Expression Levels
NCT01782859 (4) [back to overview]Interleukin (IL)-6 Cytokine Release (Inflammatory Marker)
NCT01782859 (4) [back to overview]Pain at 3 Months Post-op
NCT01782859 (4) [back to overview]Serum Prothrombin Fragment 1 and 2 (PF 1.2)
NCT01782859 (4) [back to overview]Plasmin-a 2 Antiplasmin Complex (PAP)
NCT01867294 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients in the Spironolactone Arm Who Complete the 4-week Study Intervention (Study I)
NCT01867294 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients Reporting a Grade 2+ Adverse Event Attributed to Spironolactone (Study I)
NCT01867294 (4) [back to overview]Incidence of Truncal/Extremity Rash of Any Grade in Patients in the Spironolactone Arm (Study I)
NCT01867294 (4) [back to overview]Efficacy of Spironolactone and Placebo Measured by the Use of the Brief Pictorial Rash Incidence Questionnaire (Study I)
NCT01960530 (6) [back to overview]AUC0-t
NCT01960530 (6) [back to overview]PK and Metabolism of Cortisol
NCT01960530 (6) [back to overview]Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax)
NCT01960530 (6) [back to overview]Insulin Sensitivity Under Physiological Conditions and After Administration of Dexamethasone and Infacort®, Hydrocortisone Tablets and i.v Hydrocortisone.
NCT01960530 (6) [back to overview]Concentrations of Cortisol Binding Protein
NCT01960530 (6) [back to overview]Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT02084134 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Discharged on Glucocorticoids
NCT02084134 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adrenal Insufficiency
NCT02101853 (4) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival (DFS) of High-risk (HR) and Intermediate-risk (IR) Relapse Patients
NCT02101853 (4) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival (DFS) of Low Risk (LR) Relapse Patients
NCT02101853 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) of HR and IR Relapse Patients
NCT02101853 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) of LR Relapse Patients
NCT02112916 (6) [back to overview]EFS for Standard (SR) and Intermediate Risk (IR) T-ALL Patients on the Non-bortezomib Containing Arm on This Study (no Cranial Radiation Therapy [CRT]) and Similar Patients on AALL0434 (Received CRT)
NCT02112916 (6) [back to overview]EFS for Very High Risk (VHR) T-ALL Patients Treated With High Risk (HR) Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (BFM) Intensification Blocks Who Become Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative and Those Who Remain MRD Positive at the End of HR Block 3
NCT02112916 (6) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence Rates of Isolated Central Nervous System (CNS) Relapse for SR and IR T-ALL Patients on the Non-bortezomib Containing Arm on This Study (no CRT) and Similar Patients on AALL0434 (Receive CRT)
NCT02112916 (6) [back to overview]Toxicity Rates Associated With Modified Standard Therapy, Including Dexamethasone and Additional Pegaspargase
NCT02112916 (6) [back to overview]Event-free Survival (EFS) for Modified Augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster Backbone With or Without Bortezomib in All Randomized Patients
NCT02112916 (6) [back to overview]EFS for Very High Risk (VHR) T-LLy Patients Treated With HR Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (BFM) Intensification Blocks Who Have Complete or Partial Remission and Those Who do Not Respond
NCT02408068 (6) [back to overview]Comparison of Fed and Fasted Chronocort AUC0-t
NCT02408068 (6) [back to overview]Bioavailability of Chronocort® vs Hydrocortisone Tablets - Cmax
NCT02408068 (6) [back to overview]Comparison of Fed and Fasted Chronocort Tmax
NCT02408068 (6) [back to overview]Bioavailability of Chronocort® vs Hydrocortisone Tablets - Fasted Using AUC0-t
NCT02408068 (6) [back to overview]Bioavailability of Chronocort® vs Hydrocortisone Tablets - Fasted Using Tmax.
NCT02408068 (6) [back to overview]Chronocort Cmax
NCT02481310 (2) [back to overview]To Determine the Recommended Phase II Dose (RP2D) of Ixazomib in Combination With DA-EPOCH-R.
NCT02481310 (2) [back to overview]12-month PFS (Progression Free Survival) of Treatment With Ixazomib in Combination With DA-EPOCH-R (Phase II)
NCT02716818 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 24 Weeks of the Mean of the 24-hour Standard Deviation Score (SDS) Profile for A4
NCT02716818 (6) [back to overview]Changes Relative to Standard Glucocorticoid Therapy in Body Composition (DEXA - Bone Mineral Density) - Measured at All Sites Except Germany.
NCT02716818 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With 17-OHP and A4 Levels in the Optimal Range at 9:00 at Week 24 Visit
NCT02716818 (6) [back to overview]Changes Relative to Standard Glucocorticoid Therapy in Body Composition (DEXA - Fat Mass and Lean Mass)
NCT02716818 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 24 Weeks of the Mean of the 24-hour Standard Deviation Score (SDS) Profile for 17-OHP
NCT02716818 (6) [back to overview]17-OHP and A4 by Individual Baseline Treatment Strata.
NCT02760862 (1) [back to overview]Number of Patients (in Digits) Got Earlier Relief of PDPH (in Hours) After Use of Hydrocortisone or Mannitol.
NCT02828358 (5) [back to overview]Tolerability of Azacitidine in Combination With Interfant-06 Standard Chemotherapy in Evaluable Infant Patients With Newly Diagnosed ALL With KMT2A Gene Rearrangement (KMT2A-R). KMT2A Gene Rearrangement (KMT2A-R)
NCT02828358 (5) [back to overview]Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 5 of Second Course of Azacitidine
NCT02828358 (5) [back to overview]Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 5 of First Course of Azacitidine
NCT02828358 (5) [back to overview]Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 1 Prior to Second Course of Azacitidine
NCT02828358 (5) [back to overview]Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 1 Prior to First Course of Azacitidine
NCT03335774 (2) [back to overview]Reduction in Swelling
NCT03335774 (2) [back to overview]Reduction in Itching Severity
NCT03509350 (19) [back to overview]Wechsler Memory Scale III - Delayed Recall Logical Memory Score
NCT03509350 (19) [back to overview]Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS)-IV Similarities Score
NCT03509350 (19) [back to overview]Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS)
NCT03509350 (19) [back to overview]Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression 6
NCT03509350 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants Employed
NCT03509350 (19) [back to overview]Mortality at 180 Days
NCT03509350 (19) [back to overview]Length of ICU Stay
NCT03509350 (19) [back to overview]Length of Hospital Stay
NCT03509350 (19) [back to overview]Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Score
NCT03509350 (19) [back to overview]Posttraumatic Stress Disorder-8 (PTSD-8) Score
NCT03509350 (19) [back to overview]EuroQol, 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale Score
NCT03509350 (19) [back to overview]Vasopressor and Ventilator-free Days (VVFD)
NCT03509350 (19) [back to overview]Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) Score
NCT03509350 (19) [back to overview]Hayling Test Score
NCT03509350 (19) [back to overview]Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) Score
NCT03509350 (19) [back to overview]Mortality at 30 Days
NCT03509350 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Delirium Assessed With the DeliriumTelephone Confusion Assessment Method (CAM)
NCT03509350 (19) [back to overview]Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Mortality
NCT03509350 (19) [back to overview]Digit Span Test Score
NCT03813147 (8) [back to overview]Total Plasma Clearance of MLN4924 (Pevonedistat) Added to the 3-drug Backbone of Azacitidine (Aza), Fludarabine, and Cytarabine Re-induction for Pediatric Patients With Recurrent/Refractory AML and MDS
NCT03813147 (8) [back to overview]Elimination Half-life of MLN4924 (Pevonedistat) Added to the 3-drug Backbone of Azacitidine (Aza), Fludarabine, and Cytarabine Re-induction for Pediatric Patients With Recurrent/Refractory AML and MDS
NCT03813147 (8) [back to overview]Maximum Concentration of MLN4924 (Pevonedistat) Added to the 3-drug Backbone of Azacitidine (Aza), Fludarabine, and Cytarabine Re-induction for Pediatric Patients With Recurrent/Refractory AML and MDS
NCT03813147 (8) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve of MLN4924 (Pevonedistat) Added to the 3-drug Backbone of Azacitidine (Aza), Fludarabine, and Cytarabine Re-induction for Pediatric Patients With Recurrent/Refractory AML and MDS
NCT03813147 (8) [back to overview]Maximum Time to Concentration of MLN4924 (Pevonedistat) Added to the 3-drug Backbone of Azacitidine (Aza), Fludarabine, and Cytarabine Re-induction for Pediatric Patients With Recurrent/Refractory AML and MDS
NCT03813147 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events Attributable to MLN4924 (Pevonedistat)
NCT03813147 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities of MLN4924 (Pevonedistat)
NCT03813147 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Antitumor Activity of MLN4924 (Pevonedistat)

Response Rate

Response includes both complete and partial responses. Per protocol, complete Response is defined as the complete disappearance of all clinical evidence of disease by physical examination, by imaging studies, by bone marrow biopsy (where indicated), by CNS evaluation (where indicated) and by biopsy where there is a residual abnormality on an imaging study. Bone marrow must contain <5% blasts. CSF WBC must be <5/μL with no blasts or lymphomatous cells present. Partial response is defined as: at least a 50% reduction in the size of all measurable tumor areas. Each site is to be defined by the product of the maximum length, width and depth (3 dimensions). No lesion may progress. No new lesion may appear. Bone marrow must contain <5% blasts. CSF WBC must be <5/μL with no blasts or lymphomatous cells present.. (NCT00057811)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants analyzed (Number)
Group B (Chemotherapy, Protective Therapy, Monoclonal Antib.)88
Group C (Chemotherapy, Monoclonal Antibody Therapy)83

[back to top]

Minimal Residual Disease

The presence or absence of tumor cells at the end of induction assessed by studying tissue and/or blood/marrow. Details of methods and criteria used can be found in Shiramizu at al. BJH 153:758-763, 2011 (full citation in the citation section). (NCT00057811)
Timeframe: Not Provided

Interventionpercentage of samples analyzed (Number)
Group B (Chemotherapy, Protective Therapy, Monoclonal Antib.)22
Group C (Chemotherapy, Monoclonal Antibody Therapy)70

[back to top]

Grade ≥ 3 Stomatitis

The incidence of grade ≥ 3 stomatitis. Grade 3 stomatitis: Confluent ulcerations or pseudomembranes; bleeding with minor trauma. Grade 4 stomatitis: Tissue necrosis; Significant spontaneous bleeding; life-threatening consequences (NCT00057811)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Incidence of grade ≥ 3 stomatitisNo incidence of grade ≥ 3 stomatitis
Group B (Chemotherapy, Protective Therapy, Monoclonal Antib.)441
Group C (Chemotherapy, Monoclonal Antibody Therapy)634

[back to top]

Toxic Death

Implementation of the toxic death rate stopping rule, a death must be possibly, probably or definitely attributable to Rituximab and/or chemotherapy to be considered a toxic death. (NCT00057811)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Toxic deathNo toxic death
Group B (Chemotherapy, Protective Therapy, Monoclonal Antib.)045
Group C (Chemotherapy, Monoclonal Antibody Therapy)238

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Constitutional Events

All Grade 3-4 Constitutional events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)22

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Cardiovascular Events

All Grade 3-4 Cardiovascular events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)6

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Blood/Bone Marrow Events

"All Grade 3-4 Blood/Bone Marrow events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms.~Arm Name" (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)564

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Auditory/Hearing Events

All Grade 3-4 Auditory/Hearing events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)8

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Allergy/Immunology

All Grade 3-4 Allergy/Immunology events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)1

[back to top]

2-yr Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from date of diagnosis to death or date of last follow-up. 2-year overall survival is the probability of patients remaining alive at 2-years from study entry estimated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods which censors patients at date of last follow-up. Precision of this conditional probability estimate was measured in terms of standard error. Median OS, the original primary endpoint, was not estimable based on the Kaplan-Meier method because of insufficient follow-up. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Patients are followed for survival up to 5 yrs post-therapy completion or death; As of this analysis, median follow-up among survivors was 31 months with the longest follow-up being 40 months.

Interventionprobability (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Modified IRS0.70

[back to top]

Pre-Radiation Therapy Chemotherapeutic Response

"Response pre-RT/post-CT was defined as follows with overall response defined as achieving PR or CR.~Complete Response (CR): Complete resolution of all initially demonstrable tumor on MRI or CT evaluation w/o appearance of any new areas of disease; negative CSF cytology. Partial Response (PR): >/= 50% decrease in the sum of the products of the maximum perpendicular diameters of the tumor (sum LD) relative to baseline w/o appearance of any new areas of disease; CSF cytology unchanged from that at diagnosis or clearing after being initially positive Stable Disease (SD): <50% decrease in the sum LD w/o appearance of any new areas of disease; CSF cytology unchanged from that at diagnosis or clearing after being initially positive Progressive Disease (PD): >/= 25% increase in the sum LD relative to baseline, or the appearance of any new areas of disease or appearance of positive cytology after two consecutive negative samples." (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed at study entry and pre-RT/post-CT at week 7.

Interventionproportion of evaluable patients (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Modified IRS0.58

[back to top]

Grade 3/4 Events

All Grade 3-4 events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)1021

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Renal/Genitourinary Events

All Grade 3-4 Renal/Genitourinary events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)4

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Pulmonary Events

All Grade 3-4 Pulmonary events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)4

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Pain Events

All Grade 3-4 Pain events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)31

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Neurology Events

All Grade 3-4 Neurology events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)45

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Muscloskeletal Events

All Grade 3-4 Muscloskeletal events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)8

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Metabolic/Laboratory Events

All Grade 3-4 Metabolic/Laboratory events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)128

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Infection/Febrile Neutropenia Events

All Grade 3-4 Infection/Febrile Neutropenia events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)49

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Hepatic Events

All Grade 3-4 Hepatic events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)8

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Hemorrhage Events

All Grade 3-4 Hemorrhage events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)1

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Gastrointestinal Events

All Grade 3-4 Gastrointestinal events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)139

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Dermatology Events

All Grade 3-4 Dermatology events based on CTCAEv2 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00084838)
Timeframe: Assessed during therapy up to 30 days post-therapy completion which is approximately 55 weeks for patients who completed therapy.

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Multi-agent Intrathecal and Systemic CT With RT (Mod IRS III)3

[back to top]

Event-free Survival

Monitoring of efficacy results will be performed in comparison with historical results. (NCT00096135)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CNS Patients - Treatment (Combination Chemotherapy)64.9
Testicular Relapse Patients (Combination Chemotherapy)70

[back to top]

Event-free Survival Rate

Proportion of patients who were event free at 4 months (NCT00098839)
Timeframe: At 4 months after enrollment

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Reinduction Chemoimmunotherapy With Epratuzumab Once Weekly.604
Reinduction Chemoimmunotherapy With Epratuzumab Twice Weekly.640

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics

Mean trough serum concentration measured before final dose of epratuzumab. (NCT00098839)
Timeframe: Up to day 36

Interventionug/mL (Mean)
Twice Weekly Dosing Schedule501

[back to top]

Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) < 0.01%

Proportion of patients (evaluable and had MRD measured at the end of Block 1) who had MRD < 0.01%. (NCT00098839)
Timeframe: At the end of Block 1 of re-induction therapy (day 36)

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Reinduction Chemoimmunotherapy With Epratuzumab Once Weekly.195
Reinduction Chemoimmunotherapy With Epratuzumab Twice Weekly.295

[back to top]

Remission Re-induction (CR2) Rate

The proportion of patients who achieved complete response at the end Block 1 of re-induction therapy. Complete Remission (CR) - Attainment of M1 bone marrow (<5% blasts) with no evidence of circulating blasts or extramedullary disease and with recovery of peripheral counts (ANC >1000/uL and platelet count >100,000/uL). Partial Remission (PR) - Complete disappearance of circulating blasts and achievement of M2 marrow status (5% or < 25% blast cells and adequate cellularity). Partial Remission Cytolytic (PRCL) - Complete disappearance of circulating blasts and achievement of at least 50% reduction from baseline in bone marrow blast count. Minimal Response Cytolytic (MRCL) - 50% reduction in the peripheral blast count with no increase in peripheral white blood cell count. (NCT00098839)
Timeframe: At the end of Block 1 of re-induction therapy (day 36)

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Reinduction Chemoimmunotherapy With Epratuzumab Once Weekly.646
Reinduction Chemoimmunotherapy With Epratuzumab Twice Weekly.660

[back to top]

Engraftment of Haploidentical CD34+ Selected Blood Stem Cells in Older Patients or Those With Medical Co-morbidities Following Total Lymphoid Irradiation and Antithymocyte Globulin Transplant Conditioning

number achieving donor cell engraftment (>95%) by day 90 after transplant. (NCT00185692)
Timeframe: 100 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Transplantation of CD34+ Cells4

[back to top]

Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Grade 2-4 Risk From Time of Transplant Until Day 90 Post-transplant

GVHD grading system goes from 0-4 where grade 4 is the most severe. Grade 0 and 1 do not require systemic treatment, Grade 2-4 require treatment. This trial evaluated the risk of developing acute GVHD grades 2-4 within 90 days of transplant. (NCT00185692)
Timeframe: 90 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Transplantation of CD34+ Cells1

[back to top]

Response

Anti tumor activity as assessed by computed tomography of neck/chest/abdomen/pelvis, positron emission tomography scan and/or gallium scan. Assessed by physical examination appropriate imaging studies. Bone marrow aspirate/biopsy must be normal and any macroscopic nodules in any organs detectable on imaging techniques should no longer be present. Gallium scans must be negative if initially positive. (NCT00354107)
Timeframe: Week 4

Interventionpercent (Number)
Treatment (Monoclonal Antibody Therapy, Chemotherapy)50

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) at 1 Year

(NCT00392834)
Timeframe: 1 year post treatment

InterventionCumulative proportion surviving at 1 yr (Number)
Regimen A (R-CODOX-M Chemotherapy)1.0
Regimen B (Rituximab and IVAC Chemotherapy)0.82

[back to top]

Induction Serum Asparaginase Activity Level

Serum asparaginase activity (NSAA) levels were estimated based on established methods. (NCT00400946)
Timeframe: Samples for serum asparaginase activity analyses were obtained days 4, 11, 18 and 25 post one-dose of IV-PEG on day 7 of the induction phase.

InterventionIU/mL (Median)
Day 4 NSAA LevelDay 11 NSAA LevelDay 18 NSAA LevelDay 25 NSAA Level
Overall.694.505.211.048

[back to top]

5-Year Disease-Free Survival

Disease-free survival (DFS) in a landmark analysis is defined as the duration of time from asparaginase randomization (which occurred after patients achieved complete remission and were assigned to a final risk group) to documented relapse, death during remission or second malignant neoplasm. DFS is estimated based on the Kaplan-Meier method and 5-year DFS is the probability of patients remaining alive, relapse-free and without occurrence of second malignant neoplasm 5 years from asparaginase randomization. Disease relapse is defined as >25% lymphoblasts identified morphologically in bone marrow aspirate/biopsy, or identification of lymphoblasts in marrow (any percentage) identified to be leukemic by flow cytometry, cytogenetics, FISH, immunohistochemistry, or other tests. Appearance of leukemic cells at any extramedullary site (a single, unequivocal lymphoblast in the CSF may qualify as CNS leukemia) also qualifies if confirmed by the PI. (NCT00400946)
Timeframe: Disease evaluations occurred continuously on treatment. Suggested long-term follow-up was monthly for 6m, bi-monthly for 6m, every 4 months for 1y, semi-annually for 1y, then annually. Median follow-up in this study cohort is 6 yrs, up to 10y.

Interventionprobability (Number)
Intramuscular Native E Coli L-asparaginase (IM-EC).89
Intravenous PEG-asparaginase (IV-PEG).90

[back to top]

5-Year Disease-Free Survival by Bone Marrow Day 18 Status

Disease-free survival (DFS) in a landmark analysis is defined as the duration of time from asparaginase randomization (which occurred after patients achieved complete remission and were assigned to a final risk group) to documented relapse, death during remission or second malignant neoplasm. DFS is estimated based on the Kaplan-Meier method and 5-year DFS is the probability of patients remaining alive, relapse-free and without occurrence of second malignant neoplasm 5 years from asparaginase randomization. Disease relapse is defined as >25% lymphoblasts identified morphologically in bone marrow aspirate/biopsy, or identification of lymphoblasts in marrow (any percentage) identified to be leukemic by flow cytometry, cytogenetics, FISH, immunohistochemistry, or other tests. Appearance of leukemic cells at any extramedullary site (a single, unequivocal lymphoblast in the CSF may qualify as CNS leukemia) also qualifies if confirmed by the PI. (NCT00400946)
Timeframe: Disease evaluations occurred continuously on treatment. Suggested long-term follow-up was monthly for 6m, bi-monthly for 6m, every 4 months for 1y, semi-annually for 1y, then annually. Median follow-up in this study cohort is 6 yrs, up to 10y.

Interventionprobability (Number)
M1 Day 18 Bone Marrow Status.89
M2/M3 Day 18 Bone Marrow Status.78
Hypocellular Day 18 Bone Marrow Status.88

[back to top]

5-year Disease-Free Survival by CNS Directed Treatment Group

Disease-free survival (DFS) in a landmark analysis is defined as the duration of time from asparaginase randomization (which occurred after patients achieved complete remission and were assigned to a final risk group) to documented relapse, death during remission or second malignant neoplasm. DFS is estimated based on the Kaplan-Meier method and 5-year DFS is the probability of patients remaining alive, relapse-free and without occurrence of second malignant neoplasm 5 years from asparaginase randomization. Disease relapse is defined as >25% lymphoblasts identified morphologically in bone marrow aspirate/biopsy, or identification of lymphoblasts in marrow (any percentage) identified to be leukemic by flow cytometry, cytogenetics, FISH, immunohistochemistry, or other tests. Appearance of leukemic cells at any extramedullary site (a single, unequivocal lymphoblast in the CSF may qualify as CNS leukemia) also qualifies if confirmed by the PI. (NCT00400946)
Timeframe: Disease evaluations occurred continuously on treatment. Suggested long-term follow-up was monthly for 6m, bi-monthly for 6m, every 4 months for 1y, semi-annually for 1y, then annually. Median follow-up in this study cohort is 6 yrs, up to 10y.

Interventionprobability (Number)
CNS-1.89
CNS-2.89
CNS-31.00
Traumatic Tap With Blasts.84
Traumatic Tap Without Blasts.87

[back to top] [back to top]

Induction Infection Toxicity Rate

Infection toxicity rate is defined as the percentage of patients who experience bacterial or fungal infection of grade 3 or higher with treatment attribution of possibly, probably or definite based on CTCAEv3 during remission induction phase of combination chemotherapy. (NCT00400946)
Timeframe: Assessed daily during remission induction days 4-32.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Overall26

[back to top]

Post-Induction Therapeutic Nadir Serum Asparaginase Activity Rate

Nadir serum asparaginase activity (NSAA) levels were estimated based on established methods. Post-Induction therapeutic NSAA rate is defined as the percentage of patients achieving a NSAA level above 0.1 IU/mL ever during post-induction therapy. (NCT00400946)
Timeframe: Samples for nadir serum asparaginase activity analyses were obtained before doses administered at weeks 5, 11, 17, 23 and 29 of post-induction asparaginase treatment.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Intramuscular Native E Coli L-asparaginase (IM-EC)71
Intravenous PEG-asparaginase (IV-PEG)99

[back to top]

5-Year Disease-Free Survival by MRD Day 32 Status

Disease-free survival (DFS) in a landmark analysis is defined as the duration of time from asparaginase randomization (which occurred after patients achieved complete remission and were assigned to a final risk group) to documented relapse, death during remission or second malignant neoplasm. DFS is estimated based on the Kaplan-Meier method and 5-year DFS is the probability of patients remaining alive, relapse-free and without occurrence of second malignant neoplasm 5 years from asparaginase randomization. Disease relapse is defined as >25% lymphoblasts identified morphologically in bone marrow aspirate/biopsy, or identification of lymphoblasts in marrow (any percentage) identified to be leukemic by flow cytometry, cytogenetics, FISH, immunohistochemistry, or other tests. Appearance of leukemic cells at any extramedullary site (a single, unequivocal lymphoblast in the CSF may qualify as CNS leukemia) also qualifies if confirmed by the PI. (NCT00400946)
Timeframe: Disease evaluations occurred continuously on treatment. Suggested long-term follow-up was monthly for 6m, bi-monthly for 6m, every 4 months for 1y, semi-annually for 1y, then annually. Median follow-up in this study cohort is 6 yrs, up to 10y.

Interventionprobability (Number)
Low Day 32 MRD Level.79
High Day 32 MRD Level.90

[back to top]

Induction Therapeutic Nadir Serum Asparaginase Activity Rate

Nadir serum asparaginase activity (NSAA) levels were estimated based on established methods. Induction therapeutic NSAA rate is defined as the percentage of patients achieving a NSAA level above 0.1 IU/mL at a given timepoint. (NCT00400946)
Timeframe: Samples for serum asparaginase activity analyses were obtained days 4, 11, 18 and 25 post one-dose of IV-PEG on day 7 of the induction phase.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 4 NSAA RateDay 11 NSAA RateDay 18 NSAA RateDay 25 NSAA Rate
Overall97968712

[back to top]

Post-Induction Nadir Serum Asparaginase Activity Level

Nadir serum asparaginase activity (NSAA) levels were estimated based on established methods. (NCT00400946)
Timeframe: Samples for nadir serum asparaginase activity analyses were obtained before doses administered at weeks 5, 11, 17, 23 and 29 of post-induction asparaginase treatment.

,
InterventionIU/mL (Mean)
Week 5 NSAA LevelWeek 11 NSAA LevelWeek 17 NSAA LevelWeek 23 NSAA LevelWeek 29 NSAA Level
Intramuscular Native E Coli L-asparaginase (IM-EC)0.1290.1430.1590.1800.123
Intravenous PEG-asparaginase (IV-PEG)0.7260.7730.7870.7570.806

[back to top]

Skin Conditions in Neonatal Period

(NCT00405288)
Timeframe: neonatal period

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
RashEczemaAcne
Control222
Proctofoam-HC®200

[back to top]

Respiratory Neonatal Health Concerns

(NCT00405288)
Timeframe: neonatal period

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pulmonary aspirationMild asthmaTachypnea
Control022
Proctofoam-HC®420

[back to top]

Prematurity

birth at <37 gestational weeks (NCT00405288)
Timeframe: at birth

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
yesno
Control10180
Proctofoam-HC®8193

[back to top]

Birth-weight

Weight of the baby measured in grams at time of birth. (NCT00405288)
Timeframe: until delivery

Interventiongrams (Mean)
Proctofoam-HC®3406.9
Control3487.7

[back to top]

Cardiovascular Neonatal Health Concerns in the First Two Weeks After Birth

Assessment of neonate's morphology and function of cardiovascular system in the first two weeks after birth (NCT00405288)
Timeframe: neonatal period

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Cardiovascular anomaliesHeart murmurPremature atrial contraction
Control042
Proctofoam-HC®260

[back to top]

Gestational Age at Delivery

Fetal gestational age at delivery (NCT00405288)
Timeframe: until delivery

Interventiongestational weeks (Mean)
Proctofoam-HC®39.4
Control39.1

[back to top]

Fetal Distress

Presence of fetal distress at birth: heart deceleration/acceleration, meconium/amniotic fluid (NCT00405288)
Timeframe: at birth

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Fetal distressNo fetal distress
Control31142
Proctofoam-HC®36163

[back to top]

Low Birth Weight at Birth

Low birth weight (birth weights <2500 grams) (NCT00405288)
Timeframe: at birth

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
YesNo
Control3198
Proctofoam-HC®6194

[back to top]

Mode of Delivery

Method of delivery for both groups: vaginal or caesarean section (NCT00405288)
Timeframe: at birth

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Vaginal deliveryCaesarean sectionUnknown
Control146553
Proctofoam-HC®173310

[back to top]

Other Neonatal Health Concerns

(NCT00405288)
Timeframe: neonatal period

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
ConjuctivitisMyopiaColicMilk allergyHypoglycemiaPoor feedingPoor weight gainAnemiaRenal calculi
Control024200222
Proctofoam-HC®400042200

[back to top]

Neonatal Health

Neonatal health at birthyes=need for medical attention or intervention after birth, abnormalities detected, no= no need for medical attention, no abnormalities detected at birth (NCT00405288)
Timeframe: at birth

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Yes (present neonatal health concerns)No (absent neonatal health concerns)
Control24154
Proctofoam-HC®28171

[back to top]

Neonatal Health Concerns-infections

Infections occuring in the neonatal period (NCT00405288)
Timeframe: neonatal period

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Urinary tract infectionsStreptococcus B infectionPneumoniaLeucocytosis
Control0220
Proctofoam-HC®2002

[back to top]

Number of Patients With a Partial Response, Progressive Disease, or Stable Disease Based on Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) or Measurable Disease

Patients will be evaluated for clinical benefit monthly with PSA values.Patients who are benefiting from treatment are eligible for additional cycles of treatment. Thereafter, therapy will continue until criteria for progressive disease are met. Response is based on the RECIST criteria from the National Cancer institute. Complete Response (CR) disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR) >= 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions from baseline; Progressive Disease (PD) >= increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions from baseline; Stable Disease (SD) neither sufficient for partial response nor sufficient increase for progressive disease. (NCT00460031)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Partial ResponseProgressive DiseaseStable Disease
Ketoconazole Plus Lenalidomide779

[back to top]

Time to Progression

Patients will be evaluated for clinical benefit monthly with PSA values.Patients who are benefiting from treatment are eligible for additional cycles of treatment. Thereafter, therapy will continue until criteria for progressive disease are met. Response is based on the RECIST criteria from the National Cancer institute. Complete Response (CR) disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR) >= 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions from baseline; Progressive Disease (PD) >= increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions from baseline; Stable Disease (SD) neither sufficient for partial response nor sufficient increase for progressive disease. (NCT00460031)
Timeframe: One year (12 months) after start of treatment

InterventionMonths (Median)
Ketoconazole Plus Lenalidomide3

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Grade 3 and 4 Toxicity as Assessed by NCI CTCAE v3.0

Patients will be evaluated for toxicity every 2 weeks during the first cycle. Thereafter, evaluations will be done every 28 days or more frequently if clinically indicated. (NCT00460031)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days after discontinuation of treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Ketoconazole Plus Lenalidomide19

[back to top]

Change in Immune Response From Baseline

The pattern of immune response by assessing T cell and dendritic cell markers, specifically by measuring the levels of CD4+ FoxP3+ Regulatory T cells (NCT00460031)
Timeframe: Week 8

Interventioncells/ul (Mean)
Ketoconazole Plus Lenalidomide0.18

[back to top]

Ratio of Change in Immune Response From Baseline

The pattern of immune response by assessing T cell and dendritic cell markers, specifically by measuring the ratio of BDCA-2 to BDCA-1 cells (NCT00460031)
Timeframe: Week 8

Interventionratio (Mean)
Ketoconazole Plus Lenalidomide-0.39

[back to top]

17 Hydroxyprogesterone at 08.00 Hours

(NCT00519818)
Timeframe: Cortef after one week compared with Chronocort after one month

Interventionnmol/l (Mean)
Cortef16.4
Chronocort86.9

[back to top]

Chronocort vs. Cortef Cortisol Concentrations (AUC Over 24 Hours - Time Points 0,.5,1,1.5,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,10,10.5,11, 11.5,12,13,15,17,17.5,18,18.5,19,20,22,24 Post Dose).

(NCT00519818)
Timeframe: Cortef after one week, Chronocort after one month

Interventionh*nmol/l (Mean)
Cortef5380
Chronocort3973

[back to top]

PSA Response Rate

Patients will be considered evaluable for PSA response if they have at least two post-baseline PSA measurements at least 4 weeks apart, or if they have other evidence of disease progression. A PSA response will be considered a PSA decline of at least 50% must be confirmed by a second PSA value four or more weeks later. The reference PSA for these declines should be a PSA measured within 2 weeks prior to the initiation of therapy. (NCT00536991)
Timeframe: Up to 11 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase I/II: Oral Calcitriol, Ketoconazole, Hydrocortisone35

[back to top]

Objective Tumor Response, Assessed by RECIST

Judged by monthly physical exam and radiographic evaluation. Patients will be considered evaluable for tumor response if they have at least two post-baseline tumor assessments at least 4 weeks apart, received study medication for 8 weeks or if they have evidence of disease progression. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT00536991)
Timeframe: Up to 11 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase I/II: Oral Calcitriol, Ketoconazole, Hydrocortisone24

[back to top]

Incidence of Toxicity Graded According to the National Cancer Institute CTC Version 3.0

Count of participants with serious adverse event. Please refer to the adverse event reporting for more detail. (NCT00536991)
Timeframe: Up to 11 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase I/II: Oral Calcitriol, Ketoconazole, Hydrocortisone14

[back to top]

Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)

Determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of oral calcitriol daily x 3 consecutive days a week in combination with oral ketoconazole (400 mg thrice daily [TID]) + oral hydrocortisone (20 mg AM, 10 mg PM) (NCT00536991)
Timeframe: up to 11 years

Interventionmcg (Number)
Treatment (Calcitriol, Ketoconazole, Hydrocortisone)10

[back to top]

Percent Probability of Event Free Survival (EFS) by MRD Status and Treatment Arm

Three-year EFS estimates and 90% CI will be reported by treatment arm and end-induction MRD status. (NCT00557193)
Timeframe: 3 Years from end of Induction)

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
Arm A (MRD Negative)86.05
Arm A (MRD Positive)87.5
Arm B (MRD Negative)47.37
Arm B (MRD Positive)22.73
Arm C (MRD Negative)51.85
Arm C (MRD Positive)27.03

[back to top]

Describe FLT3 Protein Expression as a Molecular Mechanism of Primary Resistance to Lestaurtinib in Leukemic Blasts

Described via mean and standard deviation by group. (NCT00557193)
Timeframe: Sampled at the start of induction

InterventionqPCR fold expression ratio (Mean)
Arm A (Standard Risk MLL-G)1.25
Arm B (IR/HR MLL-R Chemotherapy)7.85
Arm C (IR/HR MLL-R Chemotherapy and Lestaurtinib)5.83

[back to top]

Describe FLT3 Protein Expression as a Molecular Mechanism of Acquired Resistance to Lestaurtinib in Leukemic Blasts

Described via means and standard deviations in available Arm C relapse samples (NCT00557193)
Timeframe: At relapse (up to 3 years)

InterventionqPCR fold expression ratio (Mean)
Arm C (Safety/Efficacy Dose Level 2)5.73

[back to top]

Describe in Vitro Sensitivity as a Molecular Mechanism of Primary Resistance to Lestaurtinib in Leukemic Blasts

Described via means and standard deviations in samples which have primary resistance to lestaurtinib (NCT00557193)
Timeframe: Sampled at the start of induction

InterventionProportion of cells that are viable (Median)
Arm A (Standard Risk MLL-G)0.75
Arm B (IR/HR MLL-R Chemotherapy)0.48
Arm C (IR/HR MLL-R Chemotherapy and Lestaurtinib)0.47

[back to top]

Percent Probability for Event-free Survival (EFS) of MLL-R Infants Treated With Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Lestaurtinib at DL2

Event Free Probability where EFS time is defined as time from randomization to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, death) or date of last contact for patients who are event-free. EFS is constructed using the Kaplan-Meier life table method with confidence interval based on standard errors computed using the method of Peto and Peto. EFS will be compared between patients on treatment Arm C at DL2 to those on Arm B. (NCT00557193)
Timeframe: From start of post-induction therapy for up to 10 years.

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
Arm B (IR/HR MLL-R Chemotherapy)38.89
Arm C (IR/HR MLL-R Chemotherapy and Lestaurtinib)35.82

[back to top]

Pharmacodynamics PIA Levels in Infants Given Lestaurtinib at DL2 in Combination With Chemotherapy

Summarized with mean and standard deviation for those with available data in Arm C (NCT00557193)
Timeframe: Sampled between weeks 6-12 from start of induction

InterventionActivity percentage (Mean)
Arm C (Safety/Efficacy Dose Level 2)69.00

[back to top]

Percent Probability for Event-free Survival (EFS) for Patients on Arm A

EFS time is defined as time from treatment assignment to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, death) or date of last contact for patients who are event-free. EFS is constructed using the Kaplan-Meier life table method with confidence interval based on standard errors computed using the method of Peto and Peto. (NCT00557193)
Timeframe: From start of post-induction therapy for up to 10 years

Interventionpercentage probability (Number)
Arm A (Standard Risk MLL-G)86.67

[back to top]

Percent Probability for Event-free Survival (EFS) for Patients on Arm C at Dose Level 2 (DL2)

EFS time is defined as time from randomization to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, death) or date of last contact for patients who are event-free. EFS is constructed using the Kaplan-Meier life table method with confidence interval based on standard errors computed using the method of Peto and Peto. (NCT00557193)
Timeframe: From start of post-induction therapy for up to 10 years

Interventionpercentage probability (Number)
Arm C (Safety/Efficacy Dose Level 2)35.82

[back to top] [back to top]

Describe in Vitro Sensitivity as a Molecular Mechanism of Acquired Resistance to Lestaurtinib in Leukemic Blasts

Described via means and standard deviations in samples which have acquired resistance to lestaurtinib (NCT00557193)
Timeframe: At relapse (up to 3 years)

InterventionProportion of cells that are viable (Mean)
Arm C (IR/HR MLL-R Chemotherapy and Lestaurtinib)0.69

[back to top]

Subjects With Controlled Disease According to the Investigator Assessment of the Face at Week 8

(NCT00640822)
Timeframe: Week 8

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Calcipotriol Plus Hydrocortisone Ointment183
Tacalcitol Ointment147
Calcipotriol Plus Hydrocortisone Ointment Vehicle37

[back to top]

"Participants With Success According to Total Sign Score (TSS) of the Face at Week 8 (Visit 6) in the Double-blind Phase"

"Success was defined as a TSS score of 0 or 1.~For each clinical sign, a single score, reflecting the average severity of all psoriatic lesions on the face was determined according to the scale below:~Redness 0 = none (no erythema) 1 = mild (faint erythema, pink to very light red) 2 = moderate (definite light red erythema) 3 = severe (dark red erythema) 4 = very severe (very dark red erythema) Thickness 0 = none (no plaque elevation) 1 = mild (slight, barely perceptible elevation) 2 = moderate (definite elevation but not thick) 3 = severe (definite elevation, thick plaque with sharp edge) 4 = very severe (very thick plaque with sharp edge) Scaliness 0 = none (no scaling) 1 = mild (sparse, fine-scale lesions, only partially covered) 2 = moderate (coarser scales, most of lesions covered) 3 = severe (entire lesion covered with coarse scales) 4 = very severe (very thick coarse scales, possibly fissured)~The sum of the three scores constituted a TSS ranging from 0 to 12" (NCT00691002)
Timeframe: At Week 8 (end of treatment for double-blind phase)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
LEO 80190171
Calcipotriol136
Hydrocortisone131
LEO 80190 Vehicle42

[back to top]

"Participants With Controlled Disease According to the Investigator's Global Assessment(IGA) of Disease Severity of the Face at Week 8 (Visit 6) in the Double-blind Phase"

"The (sub) investigator made an assessment of the disease severity of the face using the 6-category scale below.~Clear, Almost clear, Mild, Moderate, Severe, Very severe~The assessment was made considering the condition of psoriasis vulgaris of the face at the time of the evaluation, not in relation to the condition at a previous visit.~For subjects with a baseline (Visit 1) severity of moderate or worse - controlled disease of the face was defined as clear or almost clear according to the IGA of disease severity of the face.~For subjects with a baseline (Visit 1) severity of mild - controlled disease of the face was defined as clear according to the IGA of disease severity of the face." (NCT00691002)
Timeframe: At Week 8 (end of treatment for double-blind phase)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
LEO 80190158
Calcipotriol135
Hydrocortisone115
LEO 80190 Vehicle41

[back to top]

"Participants With Controlled Disease According to the IGA of Disease Severity of the Intertriginous Areas at Week 8 (Visit 6) in the Double-blind Phase"

"The (sub)investigator made an assessment of the disease severity of the intertriginous areas using the 6-category scale below.~Clear, Almost clear, Mild, Moderate, Severe, Very severe The assessment was made considering the condition of psoriasis vulgaris of the intertrigi-nous areas at the time of the evaluation, not in relation to the condition at a previous visit.~For subjects with a baseline severity of moderate or worse - controlled disease of the intertriginous areas was defined as clear or almost clear according to the IGA of disease severity of the intertriginous areas.~For subjects with a baseline severity of mild - controlled disease of the intertriginous areas was defined as clear according to the IGA of disease severity of the intertriginous areas." (NCT00691002)
Timeframe: At Week 8 (end of treatment for double-blind phase)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
LEO 8019080
Calcipotriol55
Hydrocortisone48
LEO 80190 Vehicle14

[back to top]

"Participants With Controlled Disease According to the IGA of Disease Severity of the Face at Week 4 (Visit 4) in the Double-blind Phase"

"The assessment of the disease severity of the face was made using the 6-category scale below.~Clear Almost clear Mild Moderate Severe Very severe~The assessment was made considering the condition of psoriasis vulgaris of the face at the time of the evaluation, not in relation to the condition at a previous visit.~For subjects with a baseline severity of moderate or worse - controlled disease of the face was defined as clear or almost clear according to the IGA of disease severity of the face.~For subjects with a baseline severity of mild - controlled disease of the face was defined as clear according to the IGA of disease severity of the face." (NCT00691002)
Timeframe: At Week 4

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
LEO 80190101
Calcipotriol66
Hydrocortisone61
LEO 80190 Vehicle14

[back to top]

"Participants With Success According to Total Sign Score of the Intertriginous Areas at Week 8 (Visit 6) in the Double-blind Phase"

"The severity of the subject's psoriasis vulgaris on the intertriginous areas was evaluated in terms of the three clinical signs: redness, thickness and scaliness. All the defined intertriginous areas were rated separately using the same scale as for the investigator's assessment of clinical signs (redness, thickness and scaliness) of the face.~For each clinical sign, a single score, reflecting the average severity of all psoriatic lesions on the face was determined according to the scale below:~Redness 0 = none~= mild~= moderate~= severe~= very severe~Thickness 0 = none~= mild~= moderate~= severe~= very severe~Scaliness 0 = none~= mild~= moderate~= severe~= very severe~A mean score was calculated for each sign (redness, thickness and scaliness) based on scores of all the defined intertriginous areas with psoriasis at baseline and the sum of these mean scores constituted the TSS.~Success was defined as a TSS score of 0 or 1." (NCT00691002)
Timeframe: At Week 8 (end of treatment for double-blind phase)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
LEO 8019082
Calcipotriol81
Hydrocortisone59
LEO 80190 Vehicle15

[back to top]

Adherence to Locoid

Adherence measured by MEMS cap as the % of days that the two total prescribed doses were applied (NCT00693693)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

Interventionpercentage of days (Mean)
Cream.55
Ointment.60
Lipocream.50

[back to top]

Overall EFS Rate for the Combined Cohort of Standard- and High-Risk Patients (Who Receive the Final Chosen Dose of Dasatinib)

An event is defined as: Induction failure, relapse at any site, secondary malignancy, or death. (NCT00720109)
Timeframe: From the time entry on study to first event or date of last follow-up, assessed up to 7 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Treatment Induction (Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy & Chemotherapy)79.8
Standard-risk83.2
High-risk66.7

[back to top]

Percent of Patients MRD Positive (MRD > 0.01%) at End of Consolidation

A 1-sample Z-test of proportions (alpha=5%, 1-sided test) will be used. (NCT00720109)
Timeframe: At end of consolidation (at 11 weeks)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment Induction (Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy & Chemotherapy)10.5
Standard-risk0
High-risk66.7

[back to top]

Contribution of Dasatinib on Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) After Induction Therapy

Percent of patients MRD Positive (MRD > 0.01%) at End of Induction. (NCT00720109)
Timeframe: At the end of induction therapy (at 5 weeks)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment Induction (Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy & Chemotherapy)40.7
Standard-risk29.2
High-risk100.0

[back to top]

Event-Free Survival (EFS) of Patients With Standard-risk Disease Treated With Dasatinib in Combination With Intensified Chemotherapy

Event-Free Survival (EFS) curves will be constructed using the Kaplan-Meier life table method with standard errors computed using the method of Peto and Peto. A 1-sided 95% confidence interval for EFS will be constructed. (NCT00720109)
Timeframe: At 3 years

InterventionPercent probability (Number)
Treatment Induction (Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy & Chemotherapy)79.8
Standard-risk83.2
High-risk66.7

[back to top]

Feasibility and Toxicity of an Intensified Chemotherapeutic Regimen Incorporating Dasatinib for Treatment of Children and Adolescents With Ph+ ALL Assessed by Examining Adverse Events

Number of patients in safety cohort with dose limiting toxicity (DLT)(including treatment delay) (NCT00720109)
Timeframe: Weeks 3 through 23 of treatment (From week 3 Induction through Intensification Block 1)

InterventionPts with DLTs (Number)
Treatment Induction (Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy & Chemotherapy)1

[back to top]

Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) < 0.01% at End Block 2

Percentage of eligible and evaluable patients with MRD < 0.01% among those who had successful MRD determination at the end of Block 2. (NCT00873093)
Timeframe: End of Block 2 (Day 36 of Block 2) of re-induction therapy

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pre-B ALL Relapse 18-36 Mths From Dx (Chemotherapy)Age<=21 Yrs66.7
Pre-B ALL Relapse <18 Mths From Dx (Chemotherapy) Age <=21 Yrs42.1

[back to top]

Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) < 0.01% at End Block 1

Percentage of eligible and evaluable patients with MRD < 0.01% among those who had successful MRD determination at the end of Block 1. (NCT00873093)
Timeframe: End of Block 1 (Day 36 of Block 1) of re-induction therapy

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pre-B ALL Relapse 18-36 Mths From Dx (Chemotherapy)Age<=21 Yrs35.4
Pre-B ALL Relapse <18 Mths From Dx (Chemotherapy) Age <=21 Yrs25

[back to top]

Toxic Death Rate

The proportion of toxic death rate among all eligible patients. (NCT00873093)
Timeframe: 4 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Overall2.1

[back to top]

Severe Adverse Events (SAE) Rate.

The proportion of SAE rate among all eligible patients (NCT00873093)
Timeframe: 4 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Overall8.2

[back to top]

Second Complete Remission Rate at the End of Block 1 Reinduction Chemotherapy

The percentage of eligible and evaluable patients who have achieved complete response at the end Block 1 of re-induction therapy. (NCT00873093)
Timeframe: The outcome is measured the end of Block 1 (Day 36 of Block 1) of re-induction therapy.

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Pre-B ALL Relapse 18-36 Mths From Dx (Chemotherapy)Age<=21 Yrs72.2
Pre-B ALL Relapse <18 Mths From Dx (Chemotherapy) Age <=21 Yrs63

[back to top]

Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) < 0.01% at End Block 3

Percentage of eligible and evaluable patients with MRD < 0.01% among those who had successful MRD determination at the end of Block 3. (NCT00873093)
Timeframe: End of Block 3 (Day 36 of Block 3) of re-induction therapy

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Pre-B ALL Relapse 18-36 Mths From Dx (Chemotherapy)Age<=21 Yrs80
Pre-B ALL Relapse <18 Mths From Dx (Chemotherapy) Age <=21 Yrs63.6

[back to top]

Event Free Survival

Percentage of patients who were event free at 4 months (NCT00873093)
Timeframe: 4 months after enrollment

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Pre-B ALL Relapse 18-36 Mths From Dx (Chemotherapy)Age<=21 Yrs68.5
Pre-B ALL Relapse <18 Mths From Dx (Chemotherapy) Age <=21 Yrs37.8

[back to top]

Percentage (%) of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Tolerability Questionnaire at Month 6, Assessed by Patient and Investigator - Part B

Patient tolerability questionnaire was assessed by both patient and investigator, the responses were as follows: improvement, no change, worsening and were reported. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), month 6

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Improvement (Patient)Improvement (Investigator)No change (Patient)No change (Investigator)Worsening (Patient)Worsening (Investigator)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part B (All 6 Months)10.714.073.270.016.116.0

[back to top]

Average Concentration of S-cortisol During the Dosing Interval at Steady State (Css,av) in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A

Css,av was calculated as the area under the S-cortisol concentration versus time curve during a dosing interval at steady state (AUCtau) divided by dosing interval (tau). Participants in Arm 1 underwent standardised in-house PK sampling during 24 hours in order to assess single-dose PK of OD or TID regimen at the start of each study treatment period while participants in Arm 2 had a reduced PK sampling scheme of single dose PK on Days 1-2 and returned for multiple-dose PK sampling on Days 7-8. The average of single and multiple dosing for combined arm 1+2 was reported. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Arm 1: Week 4, Week 16, Week 16 + 1 day, Week 28; Arm 2: Week 4, Week 4 + 7 days, Week 16, Week 16 + 7 days

Interventionnanomoles per liter (Mean)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A165.1
Hydrocortisone Tablet TID - Part A203.3

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Zero to 24 Hours Adjusted by Dose (AUC0-24h/Dose) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A

AUC can be used as a measure of drug exposure. It is derived from drug concentration and time so it gives a measure how much and how long a drug stays in a body. Participants in Arm 1 underwent standardised in-house PK sampling during 24 hours in order to assess single-dose PK of OD or TID regimen at the start of each study treatment period while participants in Arm 2 had a reduced PK sampling scheme of single dose PK on Days 1-2 and returned for multiple-dose PK sampling on Days 7-8. The average of single and multiple dosing for combined arm 1+2 was reported. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Arm 1: Week 4, Week 16, Week 16 + 1 day, Week 28; Arm 2: Week 4, Week 4 + 7 days, Week 16, Week 16 + 7 days

Interventionhour per liter (Mean)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A0.047
Hydrocortisone Tablet TID - Part A0.060

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 6 Months in Diurnal Fatigue Questionnaire for Day Average- Part B

Diurnal fatigue scores (Visual Analog Scale [VAS] scores of energy, relaxed, less alert, moody, mental fatigue, intellectually slow, difficulty focusing, physical activity) were analyzed with score range from 0 to 100. A lower value corresponds to better well-being. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), month 6

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part B (All 6 Months)-0.180

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Zero to 4 Hours Adjusted by Dose (AUC0-4h/Dose) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A

AUC can be used as a measure of drug exposure. It is derived from drug concentration and time so it gives a measure how much and how long a drug stays in a body. Participants in Arm 1 underwent standardised in-house PK sampling during 24 hours in order to assess single-dose PK of OD or TID regimen at the start of each study treatment period while participants in Arm 2 had a reduced PK sampling scheme of single dose PK on Days 1-2 and returned for multiple-dose PK sampling on Days 7-8. The average of single and multiple dosing for combined arm 1+2 was reported. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Arm 1: Week 4, Week 16, Week 16 + 1 day, Week 28; Arm 2: Week 4, Week 4 + 7 days, Week 16, Week 16 + 7 days

Interventionhour per liter (Mean)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A0.025
Hydrocortisone Tablet TID - Part A0.024

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Zero to 10 Hours Adjusted by Dose (AUC0-10h/Dose) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A

AUC can be used as a measure of drug exposure. It is derived from drug concentration and time so it gives a measure how much and how long a drug stays in a body. Participants in Arm 1 underwent standardised in-house PK sampling during 24 hours in order to assess single-dose PK of OD or TID regimen at the start of each study treatment period while participants in Arm 2 had a reduced PK sampling scheme of single dose PK on Days 1-2 and returned for multiple-dose PK sampling on Days 7-8. The average of single and multiple dosing for combined arm 1+2 was reported. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Arm 1: Week 4, Week 16, Week 16 + 1 day, Week 28; Arm 2: Week 4, Week 4 + 7 days, Week 16, Week 16 + 7 days

Interventionhour per liter (Mean)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A0.041
Hydrocortisone Tablet TID - Part A0.046

[back to top]

Average Concentration of S-cortisol During the Dosing Interval at Steady State Adjusted by Dose (Css,av/Dose) in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A

Css,av was calculated as the area under the S-cortisol concentration versus time curve during a dosing interval at steady state (AUCtau) divided by dosing interval (tau). Participants in Arm 1 underwent standardised in-house PK sampling during 24 hours in order to assess single-dose PK of OD or TID regimen at the start of each study treatment period while participants in Arm 2 had a reduced PK sampling scheme of single dose PK on Days 1-2 and returned for multiple-dose PK sampling on Days 7-8. The average of single and multiple dosing for combined arm 1+2 was reported. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Arm 1: Week 4, Week 16, Week 16 + 1 day, Week 28; Arm 2: Week 4, Week 4 + 7 days, Week 16, Week 16 + 7 days

Interventionper liter (Mean)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A0.002
Hydrocortisone Tablet TID - Part A0.003

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Diurnal Fatigue Questionnaire for Day Average of Once Daily Therapy - Part A

Diurnal fatigue was assessed at 8 ante meridian (AM), at 12 AM and at 4 post meridian (PM) by a visual analogue scale (VAS) based on 8 domains (energy, relaxed, less alert, moody, mental fatigue, intellectually slow, difficulty focusing, physical activity). Mean values were calculated for the morning (8 AM), the day (12 AM), the evening (4 PM) and mean per day (mean of 8 AM, 12 AM and 4 PM) were analyzed with score range from 0 to 100. A lower value corresponds to better well-being. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Week 12

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A-3.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 6 Months in Quality of Life (QoL) Assessed by Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS) Total Score - Part B

FIS is a subject-reported scale that qualifies the impact of fatigue on daily life in participants. It consisted of 40 statements that measure fatigue in 3 areas: physical, cognitive, and psychosocial. This 40-item scale evaluates the construct of perceived impact of fatigue on everyday life. Respondents rated each statement using a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 (no problem) to 4 (extreme problem). A total score ranged from 0 to 160. A lower value corresponds to better well-being. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), month 6

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part B (All 6 Months)-1.09

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 6 Months in Quality of Life (QoL) Assessed by Psychological General Well Being (PGWB) Total Scores- Part B

The PGWB consists of 22 self-administered items rated on a scale from 1 (worst level of well-being) to 6 (maximum level of well-being) with a total score ranging from 22 to 132. A higher score represents better well-being. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), month 6

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part B (All 6 Months)-0.739

[back to top]

Comparison of Quality of Life (QoL) Assessed by Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS) Total Score Between Once Daily and Thrice Daily Therapy - Part A

FIS is a subject-reported scale that qualifies the impact of fatigue on daily life in participants. It consisted of 40 statements that measure fatigue in 3 areas: physical, cognitive, and psychosocial. This 40-item scale evaluates the construct of perceived impact of fatigue on everyday life. Respondents rated each statement using a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 (no problem) to 4 (extreme problem). A total score ranged from 0 to 160. A lower value corresponds to better well-being. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A22.6
Hydrocortisone Tablet TID - Part A26.4

[back to top]

Comparison of Quality of Life (QoL) Assessed by Psychological General Well Being (PGWB) Total Scores Between Once Daily and Thrice Daily Therapy- Part A

The PGWB consists of 22 self-administered items rated on a scale from 1 (worst level of well-being) to 6 (maximum level of well-being) with a total score ranging from 22 to 132. A higher score represents better well-being. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A110.5
Hydrocortisone Tablet TID - Part A107.7

[back to top]

Comparison on 24-hour Urinary Free Cortisol Between Once Daily and Thrice Daily Therapy-Part A

(NCT00915343)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionnanomoles per 24 hours (Mean)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A385.7
Hydrocortisone Tablet TID - Part A425.9

[back to top]

Comparison on Participant Compliance Between Once Daily and Thrice Daily Therapy - Part A

Compliance was calculated as actual consumption/expected consumption Compliance = (Number of dispensed tablets - Number of returned tablets)/(Number of days during the study period x daily Number of hydrocortisone tablets when taking the ordinary daily dose). (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Weeks 4 up to 28

Interventionpercentage use (Mean)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A104.8
Hydrocortisone Tablet TID - Part A103.1

[back to top]

Concentration at 6 Hours (C6h) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A

Participants in Arm 1 underwent standardised in-house PK sampling during 24 hours in order to assess single-dose PK of OD or TID regimen at the start of each study treatment period while participants in Arm 2 had a reduced PK sampling scheme of single dose PK on Days 1-2 and returned for multiple-dose PK sampling on Days 7-8. The average of single and multiple dosing for combined arm 1+2 was reported. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Arm 1: Week 4, Week 16, Week 16 + 1 day, Week 28; Arm 2: Week 4, Week 4 + 7 days, Week 16, Week 16 + 7 days

Interventionnanomoles per liter (Mean)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A278.5
Hydrocortisone Tablet TID - Part A426.7

[back to top]

Concentration at 7 Hours (C7h) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A

Participants in Arm 1 underwent standardised in-house PK sampling during 24 hours in order to assess single-dose PK of OD or TID regimen at the start of each study treatment period while participants in Arm 2 had a reduced PK sampling scheme of single dose PK on Days 1-2 and returned for multiple-dose PK sampling on Days 7-8. The average of single and multiple dosing for combined arm 1+2 was reported. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Arm 1: Week 4, Week 16, Week 16 + 1 day, Week 28; Arm 2: Week 4, Week 4 + 7 days, Week 16, Week 16 + 7 days

Interventionnanomoles per liter (Mean)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A214.1
Hydrocortisone Tablet TID - Part A322.4

[back to top]

Drug Concentration Half-Life From 5 to 14 Hours (t1/2[5-14h]) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A

t1/2[5-14h] is the time taken for the blood plasma concentration of a drug to halve from 5 to 14 hours. Participants in Arm 1 underwent standardised in-house PK sampling during 24 hours in order to assess single-dose PK of OD or TID regimen at the start of each study treatment period while participants in Arm 2 had a reduced PK sampling scheme of single dose PK on Days 1-2 and returned for multiple-dose PK sampling on Days 7-8. The average of single and multiple dosing for combined arm 1+2 was reported. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Arm 1: Week 4, Week 16, Week 16 + 1 day, Week 28; Arm 2: Week 4, Week 4 + 7 days, Week 16, Week 16 + 7 days

Interventionhours (Mean)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A4.60
Hydrocortisone Tablet TID - Part A18.4

[back to top]

Drug Concentration Half-Life From 5 to 24 Hours (t1/2[5-24h]) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A

t1/2[5-24h] is the time taken for the blood plasma concentration of a drug to halve from 5 to 24 hours. Participants in Arm 1 underwent standardised in-house PK sampling during 24 hours in order to assess single-dose PK of OD or TID regimen at the start of each study treatment period while participants in Arm 2 had a reduced PK sampling scheme of single dose PK on Days 1-2 and returned for multiple-dose PK sampling on Days 7-8. The average of single and multiple dosing for combined arm 1+2 was reported. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Arm 1: Week 4, Week 16, Week 16 + 1 day, Week 28; Arm 2: Week 4, Week 4 + 7 days, Week 16, Week 16 + 7 days

Interventionhours (Mean)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A7.32
Hydrocortisone Tablet TID - Part A1.84

[back to top]

First Detectable Concentration (Cfirst) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A

Participants in Arm 1 underwent standardised in-house PK sampling during 24 hours in order to assess single-dose PK of OD or TID regimen at the start of each study treatment period while participants in Arm 2 had a reduced PK sampling scheme of single dose PK on Days 1-2 and returned for multiple-dose PK sampling on Days 7-8. The average of single and multiple dosing for combined arm 1+2 was reported. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Arm 1: Week 4, Week 16, Week 16 + 1 day, Week 28; Arm 2: Week 4, Week 4 + 7 days, Week 16, Week 16 + 7 days

Interventionnanomoles per liter (Mean)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A229.0
Hydrocortisone Tablet TID - Part A295.1

[back to top]

First Detectable Concentration Adjusted by Dose (Cfirst/Dose) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A

Participants in Arm 1 underwent standardised in-house PK sampling during 24 hours in order to assess single-dose PK of OD or TID regimen at the start of each study treatment period while participants in Arm 2 had a reduced PK sampling scheme of single dose PK on Days 1-2 and returned for multiple-dose PK sampling on Days 7-8. The average of single and multiple dosing for combined arm 1+2 was reported. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Arm 1: Week 4, Week 16, Week 16 + 1 day, Week 28; Arm 2: Week 4, Week 4 + 7 days, Week 16, Week 16 + 7 days

Interventionper liter (Mean)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A0.003
Hydrocortisone Tablet TID - Part A0.004

[back to top]

Maximal Concentration (Cmax1) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A

Cmax is a term that refers to the maximum (or peak) concentration that a drug achieves in the body after the drug has been administrated. Cmax1 is the Cmax after first dose of study drug. Participants in Arm 1 underwent standardised in-house PK sampling during 24 hours in order to assess single-dose PK of OD or TID regimen at the start of each study treatment period while participants in Arm 2 had a reduced PK sampling scheme of single dose PK on Days 1-2 and returned for multiple-dose PK sampling on Days 7-8. The average of single and multiple dosing for combined arm 1+2 was reported. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Arm 1: Week 4, Week 16, Week 16 + 1 day, Week 28; Arm 2: Week 4, Week 4 + 7 days, Week 16, Week 16 + 7 days

Interventionnanomoles per liter (Mean)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A690.7
Hydrocortisone Tablet TID - Part A802.8

[back to top]

Maximal Concentration (Cmax2) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A

Cmax is a term that refers to the maximum (or peak) concentration that a drug achieves in the body after the drug has been administrated. Cmax2 is the Cmax after second dose of study drug. Participants in Arm 1 underwent standardised in-house PK sampling during 24 hours in order to assess single-dose PK of OD or TID regimen at the start of each study treatment period while participants in Arm 2 had a reduced PK sampling scheme of single dose PK on Days 1-2 and returned for multiple-dose PK sampling on Days 7-8. The average of single and multiple dosing for combined arm 1+2 was reported. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Arm 1: Week 4, Week 16, Week 16 + 1 day, Week 28; Arm 2: Week 4, Week 4 + 7 days, Week 16, Week 16 + 7 days

Interventionnanomoles per liter (Mean)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A553.8
Hydrocortisone Tablet TID - Part A446.9

[back to top]

Maximal Concentration Adjusted by Dose (Cmax1/Dose) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A

Cmax is a term that refers to the maximum (or peak) concentration that a drug achieves in the body after the drug has been administrated. Cmax1 is the Cmax after first dose of study drug. Participants in Arm 1 underwent standardised in-house PK sampling during 24 hours in order to assess single-dose PK of OD or TID regimen at the start of each study treatment period while participants in Arm 2 had a reduced PK sampling scheme of single dose PK on Days 1-2 and returned for multiple-dose PK sampling on Days 7-8. The average of single and multiple dosing for combined arm 1+2 was reported. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Arm 1: Week 4, Week 16, Week 16 + 1 day, Week 28; Arm 2: Week 4, Week 4 + 7 days, Week 16, Week 16 + 7 days

Interventionper liter (Mean)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A0.008
Hydrocortisone Tablet TID - Part A0.010

[back to top]

Participant Compliance- Part B

Compliance was calculated as actual consumption/expected consumption Compliance = (Number of dispensed tablets - Number of returned tablets)/(Number of days during the study period x daily Number of hydrocortisone tablets when taking the ordinary daily dose). (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Up to Month 6 follow-up

Interventionpercentage use (Mean)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part B (All 6 Months)102.3

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Zero to 24 Hours (AUC0-24h) of Total S-cortisol in Plasma After Multiple Doses During Part A

AUC can be used as a measure of drug exposure. It is derived from drug concentration and time so it gives a measure how much and how long a drug stays in a body. Participants in Arm 1 underwent standardised in-house PK sampling during 24 hours in order to assess single-dose PK of OD or TID regimen at the start of each study treatment period while participants in Arm 2 had a reduced PK sampling scheme of single dose PK on Days 1-2 and returned for multiple-dose PK sampling on Days 7-8. The data for combined arm 1+2 after multiple doses were reported. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Arm 1: Week 4, Week 16, Week 16 + 1 day, Week 28; Arm 2: Week 4, Week 4 + 7 days, Week 16, Week 16 + 7 days

Interventionhour*nanomole per liter (Mean)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A3962.0
Hydrocortisone Tablet TID - Part A4879.6

[back to top]

Accumulation Ratio (Rac) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A

The Rac was calculated as area under the S-cortisol concentration versus time curve during a dosing interval at steady state (AUCtau) on Day 28 divided by AUC0-24h on Day 1. Participants in Arm 1 underwent standardised in-house PK sampling during 24 hours in order to assess single-dose PK of OD or TID regimen at the start of each study treatment period while participants in Arm 2 had a reduced PK sampling scheme of single dose PK on Days 1-2 and returned for multiple-dose PK sampling on Days 7-8. The average of single and multiple dosing for combined arm 1+2 was reported. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Arm 1: Week 4, Week 16, Week 16 + 1 day, Week 28; Arm 2: Week 4, Week 4 + 7 days, Week 16, Week 16 + 7 days

Interventionratio (Mean)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A1.11
Hydrocortisone Tablet TID - Part A1.03

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration Time Curve During a Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUCtau) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A

AUC can be used as a measure of drug exposure. It is derived from drug concentration and time so it gives a measure how much and how long a drug stays in a body. AUCtau is defined as AUC during a dosing interval at steady state. Participants in Arm 1 underwent standardised in-house PK sampling during 24 hours in order to assess single-dose PK of OD or TID regimen at the start of each study treatment period while participants in Arm 2 had a reduced PK sampling scheme of single dose PK on Days 1-2 and returned for multiple-dose PK sampling on Days 7-8. The average of single and multiple dosing for combined arm 1+2 was reported. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Arm 1: Week 4, Week 16, Week 16 + 1 day, Week 28; Arm 2: Week 4, Week 4 + 7 days, Week 16, Week 16 + 7 days

Interventionhour*nanomole per liter (Mean)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A3962.0
Hydrocortisone Tablet TID - Part A4879.6

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration Time Curve During a Dosing Interval at Steady State Adjusted by Dose (AUCtau/Dose) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A

AUC can be used as a measure of drug exposure. It is derived from drug concentration and time so it gives a measure how much and how long a drug stays in a body. Participants in Arm 1 underwent standardised in-house PK sampling during 14 hours in order to assess single-dose PK of OD or TID regimen at the start of each study treatment period while participants in Arm 2 had a reduced PK sampling scheme of single dose PK on Days 1-2 and returned for multiple-dose PK sampling on Days 7-8. The average of single and multiple dosing for combined arm 1+2 was reported. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Arm 1: Week 4, Week 16, Week 16 + 1 day, Week 28; Arm 2: Week 4, Week 4 + 7 days, Week 16, Week 16 + 7 days

Interventionhour per liter (Mean)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A0.048
Hydrocortisone Tablet TID - Part A0.061

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 6 Months in Quality of Life (QoL) Assessed by Short Form-36 Survey (SF-36) For Physical and Mental Component Score - Part B

The SF-36 was a questionnaire used to assess physical functioning and is made up of eight domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health. Transforming and standardizing these domains lead to the calculation of the physical and mental component summary measures. Scores ranging from 0 to 100, with 0=worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. A higher value in the SF-36 questionnaire corresponds to better well-being. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), month 6

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Physical componentMental component
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part B (All 6 Months)0.390-0.896

[back to top]

Percentage (%) of Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) Extrapolation of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A

The percentage of AUC0-inf that is due to extrapolation from Tlast to infinity (AUC%Extrapolation) was calculated by using the formula AUC%extrapolation = 100*(AUC0-inf minus AUC0-t)/AUC0-inf. The function of this parameter was to provide information about what percentage of the theoretical curve (AUC0-inf) was possible to determine experimentally (AUC0-t). Therefore, on average, it is expected that the residual area (AUCextrapolation) is not greater than 20%. Participants in Arm 1 underwent standardised in-house PK sampling during 24 hours in order to assess single-dose PK of OD or TID regimen at the start of each study treatment period while participants in Arm 2 had a reduced PK sampling scheme of single dose PK on Days 1-2 and returned for multiple-dose PK sampling on Days 7-8. The average of single and multiple dosing for combined arm 1+2 was reported. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Arm 1: Week 4, Week 16, Week 16 + 1 day, Week 28; Arm 2: Week 4, Week 4 + 7 days, Week 16, Week 16 + 7 days

Interventionpercentage of AUC (Mean)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A10.1
Hydrocortisone Tablet TID - Part A9.26

[back to top]

Percentage (%) of Fluctuation in Concentrations of S-cortisol at Steady State in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A

Percentage of fluctuation was calculated by using formula 100*(Cmax-minimum plasma concentration [Cmin])/Cavg,ss. It was peak trough fluctuation within one dosing interval at steady state. Participants in Arm 1 underwent standardised in-house PK sampling during 24 hours in order to assess single-dose PK of OD or TID regimen at the start of each study treatment period while participants in Arm 2 had a reduced PK sampling scheme of single dose PK on Days 1-2 and returned for multiple-dose PK sampling on Days 7-8. The average of single and multiple dosing for combined arm 1+2 was reported. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Arm 1: Week 4, Week 16, Week 16 + 1 day, Week 28; Arm 2: Week 4, Week 4 + 7 days, Week 16, Week 16 + 7 days

Interventionpercentage of fluctuation (Mean)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A429.7
Hydrocortisone Tablet TID - Part A396.2

[back to top]

Time to First Detectable Concentration (Tfirst) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A

Participants in Arm 1 underwent standardised in-house PK sampling during 24 hours in order to assess single-dose PK of OD or TID regimen at the start of each study treatment period while participants in Arm 2 had a reduced PK sampling scheme of single dose PK on Days 1-2 and returned for multiple-dose PK sampling on Days 7-8. The average of single and multiple dosing for combined arm 1+2 was reported. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Arm 1: Week 4, Week 16, Week 16 + 1 day, Week 28; Arm 2: Week 4, Week 4 + 7 days, Week 16, Week 16 + 7 days

Interventionhours (Median)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A0.229
Hydrocortisone Tablet TID - Part A0.208

[back to top]

Time to First Detectable Concentration Adjusted by Dose (Tfirst/Dose) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A

Participants in Arm 1 underwent standardised in-house PK sampling during 24 hours in order to assess single-dose PK of OD or TID regimen at the start of each study treatment period while participants in Arm 2 had a reduced PK sampling scheme of single dose PK on Days 1-2 and returned for multiple-dose PK sampling on Days 7-8. The average of single and multiple dosing for combined arm 1+2 was reported. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Arm 1: Week 4, Week 16, Week 16 + 1 day, Week 28; Arm 2: Week 4, Week 4 + 7 days, Week 16, Week 16 + 7 days

Intervention(hour per nanomole)*10^6 (Mean)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A2.26
Hydrocortisone Tablet TID - Part A2.32

[back to top]

Time to Peak Plasma Concentration (Tmax1) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A

Tmax is the time after administration of a drug when the maximum plasma concentration in the body is reached. Tmax1 is the Tmax after first dose of study drug. Participants in Arm 1 underwent standardised in-house PK sampling during 24 hours in order to assess single-dose PK of OD or TID regimen at the start of each study treatment period while participants in Arm 2 had a reduced PK sampling scheme of single dose PK on Days 1-2 and returned for multiple-dose PK sampling on Days 7-8. The average of single and multiple dosing for combined arm 1+2 was reported. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Arm 1: Week 4, Week 16, Week 16 + 1 day, Week 28; Arm 2: Week 4, Week 4 + 7 days, Week 16, Week 16 + 7 days

Interventionhours (Median)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A1.00
Hydrocortisone Tablet TID - Part A0.750

[back to top]

Time to Peak Plasma Concentration (Tmax2) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A

Tmax is the time after administration of a drug when the maximum plasma concentration in the body is reached. Tmax2 is the Tmax after second dose of study drug. Participants in Arm 1 underwent standardised in-house PK sampling during 24 hours in order to assess single-dose PK of OD or TID regimen at the start of each study treatment period while participants in Arm 2 had a reduced PK sampling scheme of single dose PK on Days 1-2 and returned for multiple-dose PK sampling on Days 7-8. The average of single and multiple dosing for combined arm 1+2 was reported. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Arm 1: Week 4, Week 16, Week 16 + 1 day, Week 28; Arm 2: Week 4, Week 4 + 7 days, Week 16, Week 16 + 7 days

Interventionhours (Median)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A5.00
Hydrocortisone Tablet TID - Part A6.00

[back to top]

Time to Reach a Concentration of 200 Nanometers (nM) (T200) of S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A

Participants in Arm 1 underwent standardised in-house PK sampling during 24 hours in order to assess single-dose PK of OD or TID regimen at the start of each study treatment period while participants in Arm 2 had a reduced PK sampling scheme of single dose PK on Days 1-2 and returned for multiple-dose PK sampling on Days 7-8. The average of single and multiple dosing for combined arm 1+2 was reported. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Arm 1: Week 4, Week 16, Week 16 + 1 day, Week 28; Arm 2: Week 4, Week 4 + 7 days, Week 16, Week 16 + 7 days

Interventionhours (Median)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A0.250
Hydrocortisone Tablet TID - Part A0.167

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) Between Specified Timepoints of Total S-cortisol in Plasma After Single and Multiple Dosing During Part A

"AUC can be used as a measure of drug exposure. It is derived from drug concentration and time so it gives a measure how much and how long a drug stays in a body. AUC between specified timepoints included AUC0-4h, AUC4-12h, AUC6-12h, AUC12-24h, AUC0-10h, AUC4-10h, AUC6-10h, AUC10-24h, AUC(0-inf), AUC(24h-inf). Participants in Arm 1 underwent standardised in-house PK sampling during 24 hours in order to assess single-dose PK of OD or TID regimen at the start of each study treatment period while participants in Arm 2 had a reduced PK sampling scheme of single dose PK on Days 1-2 and returned for multiple-dose PK sampling on Days 7-8. The average of single and multiple dosing for combined arm 1+2 was reported. Here, Nsignifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome." (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Arm 1: Week 4, Week 16, Week 16 + 1 day, Week 28; Arm 2: Week 4, Week 4 + 7 days, Week 16, Week 16 + 7 days

,
Interventionhour*nanomole per liter (Mean)
AUC0-4h (N=61, 61)AUC4-12h (N=61, 61)AUC6-12h (N=61, 61)AUC12-24h (N=61, 61)AUC0-10h (N=61, 61)AUC4-10h (N=61, 61)AUC6-10h (N=61, 61)AUC10-24h (N=61, 61)AUC(0-inf) (N=52, 52)AUC(24h-inf) (N=52, 52)
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A2053.71491.8808.2306.23388.41334.7651.1465.03972.6195.3
Hydrocortisone Tablet TID - Part A1929.72302.51607.6576.63768.71839.01144.11058.05162.8410.4

[back to top]

Comparison of Overall Patient Tolerability Score Between Once Daily and Thrice Daily Therapy, Assessed by Patient and Investigator - Part A

"Overall patient tolerability score assessed by patient and investigator, ranged from 1 (feeling poor on treatment) to 5 (feeling very well on treatment). The average total score ranges from 1 to 5 with a higher score representing better tolerability of the treatment. Questionnaire assessed by patient were I have been very poorly on the treatment, I haven't been very well (or less well) on the treatment, I have been acceptably well on the treatment, I have been well on the treatment and I have been very well on the treatment. Questionnaire assessed by investigator were The patient has been feeling very poorly on the treatment, The patient has not tolerated the treatment well, The patient has tolerated the treatment less well, The patient has tolerated the treatment well and The patient has tolerated the treatment very well." (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
PatientInvestigator
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A4.284.26
Hydrocortisone Tablet TID - Part A4.364.33

[back to top]

Comparison of Quality of Life (QoL) Assessed by Short Form-36 Survey (SF-36) For Physical and Mental Component Score Between Once Daily and Thrice Daily Therapy- Part A

The SF-36 was a questionnaire used to assess physical functioning and is made up of eight domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health. Transforming and standardizing these domains lead to the calculation of the physical and mental component summary measures. Scores ranging from 0 to 100, with 0=worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. A higher value corresponds to better well-being. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Physical componentMental component
Hydrocortisone MR Tablet OD - Part A49.351.1
Hydrocortisone Tablet TID - Part A50.049.8

[back to top]

Comparison on Participant Preference by Questionnaire Between Once Daily and Thrice Daily Therapy-Part A

Participant Preference Questionnaire consisted of the following set of questions: 1. How large was the benefit with OD compared to TID and the responses were recorded as considerably poorer, somewhat poorer, comparable, large, very large; 2. How strongly concur with the following statement: I prefer novel OD to conventional TID and the responses were recorded as strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, strongly, very strongly; 3. How strongly concur with the following statement: I prefer conventional TID to novel OD and the responses were recorded as strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, strongly, very strongly. (NCT00915343)
Timeframe: Weeks 16 up to 28

Interventionpercentage of preference (Number)
Benefit compared OD to TID: Considerably poorerBenefit compared OD to TID: Somewhat poorerBenefit compared OD to TID: ComparableBenefit compared OD to TID: LargeBenefit compared OD to TID: Very largePrefer OD to TID: Strongly disagreePrefer OD to TID: DisagreePrefer OD to TID: NeutralPrefer OD to TID: StronglyPrefer OD to TID: Very stronglyPrefer TID to OD: Strongly disagreePrefer TID to OD: DisagreePrefer TID to OD: NeutralPrefer TID to OD: StronglyPrefer TID to OD: Very strongly
Hydrocortisone OD Versus TID3.85.75.720.864.23.73.75.625.961.139.635.412.54.28.3

[back to top]

Orthostatic Hypotension

(NCT01559675)
Timeframe: Postoperative Day 1

Interventionparticipants (Number)
High Dose Steroid2
Low Dose Steroid2

[back to top]

Minimum Residual Disease (MRD) Levels Present at End of Cycle 1 Therapy in Patients

"MRD positive is defined as > or = to 0.1% MRD MRD negative is define as < 0.1% MRD~All these analyses will be descriptive and exploratory and hypotheses generating in nature." (NCT01614197)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (a minimum of 4 weeks and a max of 8 weeks)

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
MRD positiveMRD negative
Dose Level 130
Dose Level 221
Dose Level 351
Dose Level 421

[back to top]

3-year Event-free Survival Rates in Patients With Relapsed ALL

Estimate the 3-year event-free survival rate of participants with first relapse or primary refractory precursor B-cell ALL treated with risk-directed therapy. (NCT01700946)
Timeframe: 3 years of follow-up since the on-study date

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
STANDARD RISK83.3
HIGH RISK55.7
All Patients Enrolled on the Study67.83

[back to top]

3-year Overall Survival Rate of Patients With Relapsed ALL

Estimate the 3-year survival rate of participants with first relapse or primary refractory precursor B-cell ALL treated with risk-directed therapy. (NCT01700946)
Timeframe: 3 years of follow-up since the on-study date

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
STANDARD RISK94.4
HIGH RISK55.5
All Patients Enrolled on the Study72.63

[back to top]

Median CD20 Expression Levels

To estimate median levels of CD20 expression at baseline, during treatment with dexamethasone-containing chemotherapy and following rituximab treatment in Block I of remission induction therapy for relapsed precursor B-cell ALL. (NCT01700946)
Timeframe: Baseline and at the end of Block I (approximately 5 weeks after the on-study date)

,,
Interventionpercentage of CD20 Antigen (Median)
At BaselineAt Block 1
All Patients Enrolled on the Study22.015.58
HIGH RISK23.1319.58
STANDARD RISK16.4011.83

[back to top]

Mean of CD20 Expression Levels

To estimate mean levels of CD20 expression at baseline, during treatment with dexamethasone-containing chemotherapy and following rituximab treatment in Block I of remission induction therapy for relapsed precursor B-cell ALL. (NCT01700946)
Timeframe: Baseline and at the end of Block I (approximately 5 weeks after the on-study date)

,,
Interventionpercentage of CD20 Antigen (Mean)
At BaselineAt Block I
All Patients Enrolled on the Study36.2319.43
HIGH RISK39.8220.10
STANDARD RISK31.1018.54

[back to top]

Interleukin (IL)-6 Cytokine Release (Inflammatory Marker)

The time frame of the study for each patient covers the period between time of surgery and until discharge from the hospital. (NCT01782859)
Timeframe: Participants will be followed from the time of surgery until discharge, expected average of 3-5 days

,
Interventionpicograms/milliliter (Mean)
BaselineWound closure4 hours postoperatively6 hours postoperatively24 hours postoperatively
Placebo2.984.4689.21115.17176.79
Prednisone/Hydrocortisone5.694.4756.7264.468.51

[back to top]

Pain at 3 Months Post-op

At 3 months postoperatively, patients were asked to rate their pain on a scale of 0-10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst pain. (NCT01782859)
Timeframe: 3 months postoperatively

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo0.92
Prednisone/Hydrocortisone0.54

[back to top]

Serum Prothrombin Fragment 1 and 2 (PF 1.2)

(NCT01782859)
Timeframe: First 24 hours after surgery

,
Interventionpmol/mL (Mean)
BaselineWound Closure4 hours postoperatively6 hours postoperatively24 hours postoperatively
Placebo334.15778.331306.761175.71356.79
Prednisone/Hydrocortisone298.12619.211138.651032.52422.61

[back to top]

Plasmin-a 2 Antiplasmin Complex (PAP)

(NCT01782859)
Timeframe: First 24 hours after surgery

,
Interventionmcg/L (Mean)
BaselineWound Closure4 hours postoperatively6 hours postoperatively24 hours postoperatively
Placebo924.671361.232251.332283.18996.39
Prednisone/Hydrocortisone1011.172251.332455.712379.57914.16

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients in the Spironolactone Arm Who Complete the 4-week Study Intervention (Study I)

The number of patients able to complete the 4-week study intervention and the 4-week observation period are reported. (NCT01867294)
Timeframe: At 4 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Study I: Spironolactone4
Study I: Placebo0

[back to top]

Number of Patients Reporting a Grade 2+ Adverse Event Attributed to Spironolactone (Study I)

Adverse events were collected at the end of one 4-week cycle and one 4-week observation period according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) CTEP Version 4.0. The number of patients reporting a grade 2+ adverse event attributed to spironolactone is reported here. (NCT01867294)
Timeframe: At 8 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Study I: Spironolactone0
Study I: Placebo0

[back to top]

Incidence of Truncal/Extremity Rash of Any Grade in Patients in the Spironolactone Arm (Study I)

Adverse events were collected at the end of each 4-week cycle according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) CTEP Version 4.0. The number of patients reporting a truncal/extremity adverse event is reported here. The treatment will be considered feasible if at least 50% of patients in the spironolactone arm develop a truncal/extremity rash of any grade at the end of 4 weeks. (NCT01867294)
Timeframe: At 4 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Study I: Spironolactone6
Study I: Placebo6

[back to top]

Efficacy of Spironolactone and Placebo Measured by the Use of the Brief Pictorial Rash Incidence Questionnaire (Study I)

Patients will be dichotomously categorized as a success if no rash is reported and a failure if rash exists at the end of 4 weeks. The number of patients that successfully completed 4 weeks of treatment and reported no rash on the Brief Pictorial Rash Incidence Questionnaire are reported. (NCT01867294)
Timeframe: At 4 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Study I: Spironolactone1
Study I: Placebo2

[back to top]

AUC0-t

Derived PK for Serum Cortisol: Area under the curve from 0-24 hours (NCT01960530)
Timeframe: Hourly from 0 to 24 hours

Interventionnmol*h/L (Geometric Mean)
Infacort®2543.24
Hydrocortisone Tablet2896.73
i.v Hydrocortisone Injection2923.46

[back to top]

PK and Metabolism of Cortisol

Blood: Serum cortisol under physiological conditions and after administration of dexamethasone and Infacort® Granules, Hydrocortisone Tablets and i.v Hydrocortisone Injection. (NCT01960530)
Timeframe: Blood, urine & saliva samples on Day 1 and/or Day 2 of each Study Period

Interventionnmol/L (Mean)
Endogenous Cortisol447.355
Dexamethasone19.349
Infacort®963.134
Hydrocortisone Tablet893.077
i.v Hydrocortisone Injection1580.337

[back to top]

Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax)

Derived PK for Serum Cortisol: Maximum serum concentration (Cmax) (NCT01960530)
Timeframe: Hourly from 0 to 24 hours

Interventionnmol/L (Geometric Mean)
Infacort®940.012
Hydrocortisone Tablet896.489
i.v Hydrocortisone Injection1563.479

[back to top]

Insulin Sensitivity Under Physiological Conditions and After Administration of Dexamethasone and Infacort®, Hydrocortisone Tablets and i.v Hydrocortisone.

A standardised mixed meal elevates blood glucose and provides a reproducible stimulation of insulin release. Lower levels of insulin secretion, whilst maintaining normoglycaemia would indicate enhanced insulin sensitivity and glucose disposal; higher insulin levels will reflect insulin resistance. (NCT01960530)
Timeframe: Blood samples on Day 1 and/or Day 2 of each Study Period

InterventionuIU/mL (Mean)
Endogenous Cortisol70.529
Dexamethasone80.668
Infacort®77.575
Hydrocortisone Tablet70.650
i.v Hydrocortisone Injection70.121

[back to top]

Concentrations of Cortisol Binding Protein

Cortisol protein binding under physiological conditions and after the administration of dexamethasone and hydrocortisone. (NCT01960530)
Timeframe: Blood samples on Day 1 and/or Day 2 of each Study Period

Interventionug/mL (Mean)
Endogenous Cortisol22.950
Dexamethasone23.441
Infacort®22.386
Hydrocortisone Tablet21.757
i.v Hydrocortisone Injection21.482

[back to top]

Adverse Events (AEs)

Number of subjects with adverse events throughout the study. (NCT01960530)
Timeframe: Days 1-2 during each Study Period

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Endogenous Cortisol3
Dexamethasone3
Infacort®0
Hydrocortisone Tablet1
i.v Hydrocortisone Injection2

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Discharged on Glucocorticoids

Patient charts were reviewed to identify patients who were discharged on prednisone (NCT02084134)
Timeframe: 1 day (Day of hospital discharge)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Steroid Treatment Arm8
Non-steroid Treatment2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adrenal Insufficiency

Adrenal insufficiency was defined by a 30 or 60 min cortisol < 18 during a cosyntropin stimulation test (NCT02084134)
Timeframe: 6 weeks following surgery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Steroid Treatment Arm2
Non-steroid Treatment1

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival (DFS) of High-risk (HR) and Intermediate-risk (IR) Relapse Patients

DFS rates of HR and IR relapse B-ALL patients who are randomized following Induction Block 1 chemotherapy to receive either two intensive chemotherapy blocks or two 5-week blocks of blinatumomab (HR/IR Randomization). DFS is calculated as the time from randomization to date of first event (treatment failure, relapse, second malignancy, remission death) or date of last contact. Two-year DFS estimates will be calculated from date of randomization for both Arm A and Arm B. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. (NCT02101853)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years from date of randomization

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (HR and IR Control)39.04
Arm B (HR and IR Blinatumomab)54.44

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival (DFS) of Low Risk (LR) Relapse Patients

DFS rates of LR relapse B-ALL patients who are randomized following Block 1 chemotherapy to receive either chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy plus blinatumomab (LR Randomization). DFS is calculated as the time from randomization to date of first event (relapse, second malignancy, remission death) or date of last contact. Three-year DFS estimates will be calculated from date of randomization for both Arm C and Arm D. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. (NCT02101853)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years from date of randomization

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm C (LR Control)58.94
Arm D (LR Blinatumomab)67.00

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) of HR and IR Relapse Patients

OS rates of HR and IR relapse B-ALL patients who are randomized following Induction Block 1 chemotherapy to receive either two intensive chemotherapy blocks or two 5-week blocks of blinatumomab (HR/IR Randomization). OS is calculated as the time from randomization to date of death or date of last contact. Two-year OS estimates will be calculated from date of randomization for both Arm A and Arm B. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. (NCT02101853)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years from date of randomization

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (HR and IR Control)58.40
Arm B (HR and IR Blinatumomab)71.33

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) of LR Relapse Patients

OS rates of LR relapse B-ALL patients who are randomized following Block 1 chemotherapy to receive either chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy plus blinatumomab (LR Randomization). OS is calculated as the time from randomization to date of death or date of last contact. Three-year OS estimates will be calculated from date of randomization for both Arm C and Arm D. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. (NCT02101853)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years from date of randomization

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm C (LR Control)88.29
Arm D (LR Blinatumomab)90.37

[back to top]

EFS for Standard (SR) and Intermediate Risk (IR) T-ALL Patients on the Non-bortezomib Containing Arm on This Study (no Cranial Radiation Therapy [CRT]) and Similar Patients on AALL0434 (Received CRT)

EFS is calculated as time from randomization at study entry to first event (induction failure, induction death, relapse, second malignancy, remission death) or date of last contact. (NCT02112916)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
AALL1231 T-ALL Patients88.3
AALL0434 T-ALL Patients88.8

[back to top]

EFS for Very High Risk (VHR) T-ALL Patients Treated With High Risk (HR) Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (BFM) Intensification Blocks Who Become Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative and Those Who Remain MRD Positive at the End of HR Block 3

EFS will be calculated as time from the end of the three high-risk blocks of therapy to first event (relapse, second malignancy, remission death) or date of last contact. (NCT02112916)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
VHR T-ALL MRD Undetectable25.0
VHR T-ALL MRD Detectable88.9

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence Rates of Isolated Central Nervous System (CNS) Relapse for SR and IR T-ALL Patients on the Non-bortezomib Containing Arm on This Study (no CRT) and Similar Patients on AALL0434 (Receive CRT)

Cumulative incidence of isolated CNS relapse adjusting for competing risks using the method of: Gray R, A class of K-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Stat 1141:1154, 1988 (NCT02112916)
Timeframe: 3 years

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Isolated CNS RelapseIsolated Bone Marrow RelapseCombined Bone Marrow Relapse
AALL0434 T-ALL Patients2.23.01.8
AALL1231 T-ALL Patients3.61.41.3

[back to top]

Toxicity Rates Associated With Modified Standard Therapy, Including Dexamethasone and Additional Pegaspargase

Percentage of patients who experienced Grade 3 or higher Toxicity Assessed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (NCT02112916)
Timeframe: 3 years from start of therapy by patient

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Total Patients78.0

[back to top]

Event-free Survival (EFS) for Modified Augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster Backbone With or Without Bortezomib in All Randomized Patients

EFS is calculated as time from randomization at study entry to first event (induction failure, induction death, relapse, second malignancy, remission death) or date of last contact. Three-year EFS rates will be calculated for both groups. (NCT02112916)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (Combination Chemotherapy)81.7
Arm B (Combination Chemotherapy, Bortezomib)85.1

[back to top]

EFS for Very High Risk (VHR) T-LLy Patients Treated With HR Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (BFM) Intensification Blocks Who Have Complete or Partial Remission and Those Who do Not Respond

EFS for very high risk (VHR) T-LLy patients treated with HR Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (BFM) intensification blocks who have complete or partial remission and those who do not respond (NCT02112916)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
VHR T-LLy (CR/PR)0

[back to top]

Comparison of Fed and Fasted Chronocort AUC0-t

"Area under the curve from 0 to 24 hours for serum cortisol. Please note that the AUC0-t will be presented as a single figure (geometric mean) to represent exposure over time.~N.B., the sampling points for Hydrocortisone are as follows: 0h, 0.25h, 0.5h, 0.75h, 1h, 1.5h, 2h, 2.5h, 3h, 4h, 5h, 6h, 8h, 10h and 12h post-dose. However, the results for Hydrocortisone will not be incorporated into the analysis for this outcome measure." (NCT02408068)
Timeframe: 24 hours (at 0h, then 0.5h, 1h, 1.5h, 2h, 2.5h, 3h, 3.5h, 4h, 4.5h, 5h, 5.5h, 6h, 6.5h, 7h, 7.5h, 8h, 9h, 10h, 11h, 12h, 13h, 14h, 15h, 16h, 18h, 20h, 22h and 24h post-dose.)

Interventionh*nmol/L (Geometric Mean)
Chronocort Fed3229.26
Chronocort Fasted2980.85
Immediate-Release Hydrocortisone2466.90

[back to top]

Bioavailability of Chronocort® vs Hydrocortisone Tablets - Cmax

Evaluation of the relative bioavailability of Chronocort® and immediate release hydrocortisone at a single dose of 20 mg in the fasted state by Cmax (NCT02408068)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionnmol/L (Geometric Mean)
Chronocort Fasted708.45
Immediate-Release Hydrocortisone856.36
Chronocort Fed549.49

[back to top]

Comparison of Fed and Fasted Chronocort Tmax

Comparison of Fed and Fasted Chronocort based on the time to achive the maximum concentration of serum cortisol (NCT02408068)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionhours (Median)
Chronocort Fed6.75
Chronocort Fasted4.5
Immediate-Release Hydrocortisone0.87

[back to top]

Bioavailability of Chronocort® vs Hydrocortisone Tablets - Fasted Using AUC0-t

To evaluate the relative bioavailability of Chronocort® and immediate release hydrocortisone at a single dose of 20 mg in the fasted state using area under the curve (NCT02408068)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionh*nmol/L (Geometric Mean)
Chronocort Fasted2980.85
Immediate-Release Hydrocortisone2466.90
Chronocort Fed3229.26

[back to top]

Bioavailability of Chronocort® vs Hydrocortisone Tablets - Fasted Using Tmax.

To evaluate the relative bioavailability of Chronocort® and immediate release hydrocortisone at a single dose of 20 mg in the fasted state using Tmax. (NCT02408068)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionhours (Median)
Chronocort Fasted4.5
Immediate-Release Hydrocortisone0.87
Chronocort Fed6.75

[back to top]

Chronocort Cmax

Comparison of fed and fasted Chronocort Cmax for serum cortisol. (NCT02408068)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionnmol/L (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Chronocort Fed549.49
Chronocort Fasted708.46
Immediate-Release Hydrocortisone856.36

[back to top] [back to top]

12-month PFS (Progression Free Survival) of Treatment With Ixazomib in Combination With DA-EPOCH-R (Phase II)

12-month PFS will be defined as the percentage of patients alive and progression free 12 months from start of therapy. Patients lost to follow up will be censored from last point of contact. PFS was calculated using a Kplan-meier estimation with the probability of patients being progression free at 12 months, presented as the percentage based on this probability. (NCT02481310)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months from initiation of treatment

Interventionprobability (%) of patients alive (Number)
Treatment (Combination Chemotherapy, Rituximab, Ixazomib)75.84

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 24 Weeks of the Mean of the 24-hour Standard Deviation Score (SDS) Profile for A4

Change from baseline to 24 weeks of the mean of the 24-hour standard deviation score (SDS) - also referred to as a z-score - profile for A4 (androstenedione). This secondary efficacy variable was calculated as follows: the natural logarithm of the mean of the 24-hour SDS for the natural logarithm of A4. The mean of the 24-hour SDS profile for each visit was the arithmetic mean of all the SDSs with the first and last (13th) weighted one half relative to the intermediate SDSs. For each of the 13 log-transformed A4 values at each visit, an SDS was calculated by counting the number of SDs that were above or below the mean of the log-transformed range. A negative z-score indicated greater control of A4 when compared to baseline (0). (NCT02716818)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Chronocort®0.113
Standard Glucocorticoid Therapy-0.041

[back to top]

Changes Relative to Standard Glucocorticoid Therapy in Body Composition (DEXA - Bone Mineral Density) - Measured at All Sites Except Germany.

Changes relative to Standard glucocorticoid therapy in body composition (DEXA - bone mineral density only) - measured at all sites except Germany. (NCT02716818)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 weeks

Interventiong/cm^2 (Mean)
Chronocort - DEXA - Bone Mineral Density-0.001
Standard Glucocorticoid Therapy - DEXA - Bone Mineral Density-0.008

[back to top]

Number of Participants With 17-OHP and A4 Levels in the Optimal Range at 9:00 at Week 24 Visit

"17-OHP and A4 levels at 09:00 at the week 24 visit, as a responder analysis (i.e. the number of participants achieving results in the optimal range).~Optimal range for 17-OHP (male) = 1.2* - 6.7 nmol/L (female) = 1.2* - 8.6 Optimal range for A4 (male) = 1.4 - 5.2 nmol/L (female) = 1.0 - 7.0 nmol/L~* = There is no lower reference range available for 17-OHP, hence the lower limit of the optimal range was used in the derivation of the average Standard Deviation Score. This enabled calculation of an 'unsigned' SDS score which was used to assess potential over-treatment as well as under-treatment." (NCT02716818)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Chronocort - 09:00h Response - 17-OHP30
Chronocort - 09:00h Response - A425
Standard Glucocorticoid Therapy - 09:00h Response - 17-OHP30
Standard Glucocorticoid Therapy - 09:00h Response - A430

[back to top]

Changes Relative to Standard Glucocorticoid Therapy in Body Composition (DEXA - Fat Mass and Lean Mass)

Changes relative to Standard glucocorticoid therapy in body composition (DEXA) (fat mass and lean mass) - measured at all sites except Germany. (NCT02716818)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 weeks

Interventionkilograms (Mean)
Chronocort - DEXA - Fat Mass-0.575
Standard Glucocorticoid Therapy - DEXA - Fat Mass0.445
Chronocort - DEXA - Lean Mass0.640
Standard Glucocorticoid Therapy - DEXA - Lean Mass0.234

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 24 Weeks of the Mean of the 24-hour Standard Deviation Score (SDS) Profile for 17-OHP

Change from baseline to 24 weeks of the mean of the 24-hour standard deviation score (SDS) - also referred to as a z-score - profile for 17-OHP (17-Hydroxyprogesterone). The primary efficacy variable was the natural logarithm of the mean of the 24-hour SDS for the natural logarithm of 17-OHP. The mean of the 24-hour SDS profile for each visit was the arithmetic mean of all the SDSs with the first and last (13th) weighted one half relative to the intermediate SDSs. For each of the 13 log-transformed 17-OHP values at each visit, an SDS was calculated by counting the number of SDs that were above or below the mean of the log-transformed range. A negative z-score indicated greater control of 17-OHP when compared to baseline (0). (NCT02716818)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Chronocort®-0.403
Standard Glucocorticoid Therapy-0.172

[back to top]

17-OHP and A4 by Individual Baseline Treatment Strata.

17-OHP and A4 by individual baseline treatment strata presented in the same manner as the primary endpoint (using 24-hour SDS profile at 24 weeks). Change from baseline to 24 weeks of the mean of the 24-hour standard deviation score (SDS) - also referred to as a z-score - profile for 17-OHP and A4. This secondary efficacy variable was calculated as follows: the natural logarithm of the mean of the 24-hour SDS for the natural logarithm of 17-OHP and A4. The mean of the 24-hour SDS profile for each visit was the arithmetic mean of all the SDSs with the first and last (13th) weighted one half relative to the intermediate SDSs. For each of the 13 log-transformed 17-OHP and A4 values at each visit, an SDS was calculated by counting the number of SDs that were above or below the mean of the log-transformed range. A negative z-score indicated greater control of 17-OHP and A4 when compared to baseline (0). (NCT02716818)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionZ-score (Mean)
Pre-Baseline - Hydrocortisone - 17-OHP-0.248
Pre-Baseline - Prednisone/Prednisolone - 17-OHP-0.061
Pre-Baseline - Dexamethasone - 17-OHP-0.245
Pre-Baseline - Chronocort vs. Hydrocortisone - 17-OHP-0.431
Pre-Baseline - Chronocort vs. Prednisone/Prednisolone - 17-OHP-0.320
Pre-Baseline - Chronocort vs. Dexamethasone - 17-OHP-0.565
Pre-Baseline - Hydrocortisone - A4-0.211
Pre-Baseline - Prednisone/Prednisolone - A40.100
Pre-Baseline - Dexamethasone - A40.368
Pre-Baseline - Chronocort vs. Hydrocortisone - A40.015
Pre-Baseline - Chronocort vs. Prednisone/Prednisolone - A40.328
Pre-Baseline - Chronocort vs. Dexamethasone - A4-0.092

[back to top]

Number of Patients (in Digits) Got Earlier Relief of PDPH (in Hours) After Use of Hydrocortisone or Mannitol.

(NCT02760862)
Timeframe: within 48 hours after starting of treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group (I) (N=25)25
Group (II) (N=25)25

[back to top]

Tolerability of Azacitidine in Combination With Interfant-06 Standard Chemotherapy in Evaluable Infant Patients With Newly Diagnosed ALL With KMT2A Gene Rearrangement (KMT2A-R). KMT2A Gene Rearrangement (KMT2A-R)

Proportion of KMT2A-Rearranged patients treated with azacitidine with Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) from the first course of azacitidine administration up to fourth course of azacitidine administration. (NCT02828358)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
KMT2A-Rearranged6.45

[back to top]

Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 5 of Second Course of Azacitidine

Will calculate the percentage of CpG site methylation for all patients after the second course of azacitidine. Mean and standard deviation will be reported. (NCT02828358)
Timeframe: Week 13, Day 5 (Following induction phase (5 weeks), the first course of Azacitidine (1 week), and consolidation (6 weeks), the second course of Azacitidine began around Week 13 of therapy)

InterventionPercentage of CpG methylation (Mean)
KMT2A-Rearranged74.52

[back to top]

Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 5 of First Course of Azacitidine

Will calculate the percentage of CpG site methylation for all patients after the first course of azacitidine. Mean and standard deviation will be reported. (NCT02828358)
Timeframe: Week 6, Day 5 (Following the induction phase (35 days), the first course of Azacitidine began around Week 6 of therapy)

InterventionPercentage of CpG methylation (Mean)
KMT2A-Rearranged75.54

[back to top]

Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 1 Prior to Second Course of Azacitidine

Will calculate the percentage of CpG site methylation for all patients before the second course of azacitidine. Mean and standard deviation will be reported. (NCT02828358)
Timeframe: Week 13, Day 1 (Following induction phase (5 weeks), the first course of Azacitidine (1 week), and consolidation (6 weeks), the second course of Azacitidine began around Week 13 of therapy)

InterventionPercentage of CpG methylation (Mean)
KMT2A-Rearranged76.5

[back to top]

Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 1 Prior to First Course of Azacitidine

Will calculate the percentage of CpG site methylation for all patients before the first course of azacitidine. Mean and standard deviation will be reported. (NCT02828358)
Timeframe: Week 6, Day 1 (Following the induction phase (35 days), the first course of Azacitidine began around Week 6 of therapy)

InterventionPercentage of CpG methylation (Mean)
KMT2A-Rearranged78.17

[back to top]

Reduction in Swelling

"Reduction in the swelling of internal hemorrhoid was measured by anoscopy. Visual assessment of hemorrhoids was performed at end of treatment. Video of the procedure will be recorded for blinded central reading and assessment. Swelling was graded on a scale from 0 - None to 4 - Very Severe.~Numeric grades and their changes from baseline are summarized descriptively by visit and treatment group. Changes from baseline will be compared between the treatment groups. Mean difference between the groups and its 95% confidence interval will be displayed at Visit 4, along with the p-value from the two-sample t-test." (NCT03335774)
Timeframe: Day 15

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Hydrocortisone Acetate Suppository, 25 mg2.3
Placebo (Vehicle) Suppository2.0

[back to top]

Reduction in Itching Severity

"Patient-reported outcome (PRO) was collated and analyzed by deploying the Internal Hemorrhoid Sign and Symptom Assessment (IHSSA) questionnaire. The patients updated the questionnaire on a daily basis between visits 1-5. Responses to each item were averaged across each period.~The mean score from the Screening period was considered the baseline score.~Mean scores and their changes from baseline were summarized.~Itching was scored from on 0-4 scale (0 =No itching, 1 = A little itching, 2 =Moderate itching, 3 = A lot of itching, 4 = Worst itching that you could imagine" (NCT03335774)
Timeframe: Day 15

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Hydrocortisone Acetate Suppository, 25 mg0.74
Placebo (Vehicle) Suppository0.71

[back to top]

Wechsler Memory Scale III - Delayed Recall Logical Memory Score

Memory is assessed with the Logical Memory subtest from the Wechsler Memory Scale III. Participants listened to two short paragraphs and were asked to recall details from each story after 30 minutes. Scores represent the number of correctly remembered details. Total scores range from 0 to 25 with higher scores reflecting better memory. (NCT03509350)
Timeframe: Day 180

Interventioncorrect story details (Mean)
Treatment Protocol6.9
Control Protocol8.1

[back to top]

Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS)-IV Similarities Score

Reasoning is assessed with the WAIS-IV Similarities instrument. Participants were asked to explain how two words are alike. Responses are scored according to how correct they are, with a score of 0 for incorrect answers. After 3 consecutive scores of 0 the survey is stopped. Total raw scores vary depending on the number of word pairs presented. Higher scores indicate better performance. Scores will be compared between study arms. (NCT03509350)
Timeframe: Day 180

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Treatment Protocol7.7
Control Protocol8.2

[back to top]

Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS)

The Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS) is an 11-item instrument assessing orientation. Correct responses to the items are scored in a variety of ways, depending on how much of the response is correct. Total scores range from 0 to 41 with higher scores indicating increased cognitive orientation. (NCT03509350)
Timeframe: Day 180

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Treatment Protocol30.6
Control Protocol31.2

[back to top]

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression 6

Depression is assessed with the PROMIS Depression 6 instrument. This tool includes 6 items with response options on a scale of 1 to 5. Total raw scores range from 6 to 30 with higher scores indicating greater symptoms of depression. (NCT03509350)
Timeframe: Day 180

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Treatment Protocol11.9
Control Protocol11.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants Employed

The Employment Questionnaire is a brief measure of the participant's employment history and ability or capacity to work. The number of participants who indicated being employed are presented here. (NCT03509350)
Timeframe: Day 180

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment Protocol17
Control Protocol25

[back to top]

Mortality at 180 Days

The number of participants who did not survive until Day 180 is compared between study arms. (NCT03509350)
Timeframe: Day 180

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment Protocol102
Control Protocol94

[back to top]

Length of ICU Stay

The number of days that participants were in the ICU is compared between study arms. (NCT03509350)
Timeframe: Day 30

Interventiondays (Mean)
Treatment Protocol6.7
Control Protocol6.4

[back to top]

Length of Hospital Stay

The number of days that participants were in the hospital is compared between study arms. (NCT03509350)
Timeframe: Day 30

Interventiondays (Mean)
Treatment Protocol12.6
Control Protocol13.5

[back to top]

Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Score

Activities of daily living is assessed with the Katz ADL instrument. The Katz ADL has 6 items asking if participants can perform daily tasks independently. Responses are scored as 1 = yes and 0 = no. Total scores range from 0 to 6 with higher scores indicating greater independence. (NCT03509350)
Timeframe: Day 180

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Treatment Protocol2.8
Control Protocol2.4

[back to top]

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder-8 (PTSD-8) Score

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is assessed with the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder - 8 instrument. The PTSD-8 includes 8 items which are answered on a 4 point scale where 01 = not at all and 3 = all of the time. Total scores range from 0 to 24 where higher scores indicate greater symptoms of PTSD. (NCT03509350)
Timeframe: Day 180

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Treatment Protocol5.7
Control Protocol5.2

[back to top]

EuroQol, 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale Score

Quality of life is assessed with the Visual Analog Scale of the EuroQol, 5 dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire. The EQ-5D asks about 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain, and depression). The questionnaire includes a visual analog scale where respondents rate their current health where 0 = worst health imaginable and 100 = best health imaginable. (NCT03509350)
Timeframe: Day 180

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Treatment Protocol66
Control Protocol67

[back to top]

Vasopressor and Ventilator-free Days (VVFD)

The primary outcome measure is VVFD in the first 30 days after the start of treatment. The endpoint was recorded to the nearest day. Participants who died are scored zero days, even if there was a period during which the participant was alive and free of vasopressors and mechanical ventilation. Participants who must return to ventilation and/or vasopressors had their counters reset at zero days. (NCT03509350)
Timeframe: Up to Day 30

Interventiondays (Median)
Treatment Protocol25
Control Protocol26

[back to top]

Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) Score

Instrumental activities of daily living is assessed with the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ). The FAQ includes 10 items which are scored on a scale from 0 to 3 where 0 = normal and 3 = dependent. Total scores range from 0 to 30 and lower scores indicate that the respondent is able to perform daily activities. A score of 9 (where the person is dependent in 3 activities) is used as a cut-point indicating impairments with functioning. (NCT03509350)
Timeframe: Day 180

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Treatment Protocol9.5
Control Protocol7.7

[back to top]

Hayling Test Score

Executive function is assessed with the Hayling Test. The Hayling Test includes two parts of 15 items each where participants complete sentences by providing the missing word. The test is scored as the amount of time it takes, in seconds, to recite a correct response and the appropriateness of the response (in Part 2). Scaled scores range from 1 to 10 where 1 = impaired, 6 = average, and 10 = very superior. (NCT03509350)
Timeframe: Day 180

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Treatment Protocol4.2
Control Protocol4.2

[back to top]

Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) Score

Language is assessed with the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT). Participants generate words beginning with selected letters within 60 seconds. Generating a higher number of words indicates greater language skills. (NCT03509350)
Timeframe: Day 180

Interventionwords (Mean)
Treatment Protocol40
Control Protocol40

[back to top]

Mortality at 30 Days

The number of participants who did not survive until Day 30 is compared between study arms. (NCT03509350)
Timeframe: Day 30

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment Protocol56
Control Protocol60

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Delirium Assessed With the DeliriumTelephone Confusion Assessment Method (CAM)

The Telephone CAM evaluates dementia with 9-items, where additional questions are asked if symptoms are present. Rather than providing a summary score, if participants exhibit signs of a change in mental status which fluctuates and they experience inattention, along with disorganized thinking or altered level of consciousness, delirium is suggested. (NCT03509350)
Timeframe: Day 180

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment Protocol0
Control Protocol0

[back to top]

Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Mortality

The number of participants who died while in the ICU is compared between study arms. (NCT03509350)
Timeframe: Day 30

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment Protocol52
Control Protocol49

[back to top]

Digit Span Test Score

The Digit Span Test is used to assesses attention. In the Digit Span Test, participants are read a series of numbers and are asked to repeat them back in the same order. The Digit Span test is scored by the number of digits the participant is able to remember in each test. Higher scores indicate greater ability to pay attention and to remember sequences. The average adult can remember about 7 numbers, plus or minus two, without making an error. (NCT03509350)
Timeframe: Day 180

Interventionnumbers recalled (Mean)
Treatment Protocol8.3
Control Protocol9.5

[back to top]

Total Plasma Clearance of MLN4924 (Pevonedistat) Added to the 3-drug Backbone of Azacitidine (Aza), Fludarabine, and Cytarabine Re-induction for Pediatric Patients With Recurrent/Refractory AML and MDS

Median (Range) of the total plasma clearance of MLN4924 (pevonedistat) added to the 3-drug backbone of azacitidine (aza), fludarabine, and cytarabine re-induction for pediatric patients with recurrent/refractory AML and MDS by dose level measured pre-dose, end of infusion, 4-6 hours, and 24 hours post-dose infusion on Days 1 and 5. (NCT03813147)
Timeframe: Up to 5 days

InterventionL/h/m^2 (Median)
Stratum 1 With 20 mg/m^220.1
PK With 20 mg/m^219.2

[back to top]

Elimination Half-life of MLN4924 (Pevonedistat) Added to the 3-drug Backbone of Azacitidine (Aza), Fludarabine, and Cytarabine Re-induction for Pediatric Patients With Recurrent/Refractory AML and MDS

Median (Range) of the elimination half-life of MLN4924 (pevonedistat) added to the 3-drug backbone of azacitidine (aza), fludarabine, and cytarabine re-induction for pediatric patients with recurrent/refractory AML and MDS by dose level measured pre-dose, end of infusion, 4-6 hours, and 24 hours post-dose infusion on Days 1 and 5. (NCT03813147)
Timeframe: Up to 5 days

InterventionHour (Median)
Stratum 1 With 20 mg/m^24.7
PK With 20 mg/m^25.5

[back to top]

Maximum Concentration of MLN4924 (Pevonedistat) Added to the 3-drug Backbone of Azacitidine (Aza), Fludarabine, and Cytarabine Re-induction for Pediatric Patients With Recurrent/Refractory AML and MDS

Median (Range) of the maximum concentration of MLN4924 (pevonedistat) added to the 3-drug backbone of azacitidine (aza), fludarabine, and cytarabine re-induction for pediatric patients with recurrent/refractory AML and MDS by dose level measured pre-dose, end of infusion, 4-6 hours, and 24 hours post-dose infusion on Days 1 and 5. (NCT03813147)
Timeframe: Up to 5 days

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Stratum 1 With 20 mg/m^2248.5
PK With 20 mg/m^2213

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve of MLN4924 (Pevonedistat) Added to the 3-drug Backbone of Azacitidine (Aza), Fludarabine, and Cytarabine Re-induction for Pediatric Patients With Recurrent/Refractory AML and MDS

Median (Range) of the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve of MLN4924 (pevonedistat) added to the 3-drug backbone of azacitidine (aza), fludarabine, and cytarabine re-induction for pediatric patients with recurrent/refractory AML and MDS by dose level measured pre-dose, end of infusion, 4-6 hours, and 24 hours post-dose infusion on Days 1 and 5. (NCT03813147)
Timeframe: Up to 5 days

Interventionhr*ng/mL (Median)
Stratum 1 With 20 mg/m^21004.9
PK With 20 mg/m^21047.4

[back to top]

Maximum Time to Concentration of MLN4924 (Pevonedistat) Added to the 3-drug Backbone of Azacitidine (Aza), Fludarabine, and Cytarabine Re-induction for Pediatric Patients With Recurrent/Refractory AML and MDS

Median (Range) of the maximum time to concentration of MLN4924 (pevonedistat) added to the 3-drug backbone of azacitidine (aza), fludarabine, and cytarabine re-induction for pediatric patients with recurrent/refractory AML and MDS by dose level measured pre-dose, end of infusion, 4-6 hours, and 24 hours post-dose infusion on Days 1 and 5. (NCT03813147)
Timeframe: Up to 5 days

InterventionHour (Median)
Stratum 1 With 20 mg/m^21.2
PK With 20 mg/m^21.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events Attributable to MLN4924 (Pevonedistat)

Frequency of patients with at least one grade 3 adverse event at least possibly attributable to MLN4924 (pevonedistat) added to the 3-drug backbone of azacitidine (aza), fludarabine, and cytarabine re-induction for pediatric patients with recurrent/refractory AML and MDS by dose level. (NCT03813147)
Timeframe: Up to 70 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Stratum 1 With 20 mg/m^26
PK With 20 mg/m^26

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities of MLN4924 (Pevonedistat)

Frequency of patients with dose limiting toxicity in the first cycle of MLN4924 (pevonedistat) added to the 3-drug backbone of azacitidine (aza), fludarabine, and cytarabine re-induction for pediatric patients with recurrent/refractory AML and MDS by dose level among patients in the dose escalation cohort. (NCT03813147)
Timeframe: Up to 35 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Stratum 1 With 20 mg/m^21
PK With 20 mg/m^22

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Antitumor Activity of MLN4924 (Pevonedistat)

Frequency of participants with best overall response by dose level of PR or CR for MLN4924 (pevonedistat) added to the 3-drug backbone of azacitidine (aza), fludarabine, and cytarabine re-induction Per Response Evaluation Criteria for CR (M1 bone marrow (< 5% blasts) with no evidence of circulating blasts or extramedullary disease and with recovery of peripheral blood counts (ANC > 1000/uL and platelet count > 100,000/uL), CRp (M1 bone marrow (< 5% blasts) and no evidence of circulating blasts or extramedullary disease and with recovery of ANC > 1000/uL and platelet transfusion independence), CRi (M1 bone marrow (<5% blasts) and no evidence of circulating blasts or extramedullary disease and with ANC < 1000/uL or platelet count < 100,000/uL without platelet transfusion independence), or PR (M2 marrow status (> 5% or < 25% blasts cells) and at least 50% decrease in bone marrow blast percent from baseline. (NCT03813147)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Stratum 1 With 20 mg/m^21
PK With 20 mg/m^22

[back to top]