Page last updated: 2024-11-04

azacitidine

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth

Description

Azacitidine: A pyrimidine analogue that inhibits DNA methyltransferase, impairing DNA methylation. It is also an antimetabolite of cytidine, incorporated primarily into RNA. Azacytidine has been used as an antineoplastic agent. [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

5-azacytidine : An N-glycosyl-1,3,5-triazine that is 4-amino-1,3,5-triazin-2(1H)-one substituted by a beta-D-ribofuranosyl residue via an N-glycosidic linkage. An antineoplastic agent, it is used in the treatment of myeloid leukaemia. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID9444
CHEMBL ID1489
CHEBI ID2038
SCHEMBL ID3741
MeSH IDM0002060

Synonyms (186)

Synonym
MLS002153249
azacytidine
DIVK1C_000125
KBIO1_000125
5-aza-cr
vidaza
ladakamycin
u-18496
mylosar
ns-17
vidaza (tn)
D03021
EU-0100035
azacitidine (jan/usan/inn)
5-azacytidine, >=98% (hplc)
c8h12n4o5
SPECTRUM_001262
MOLMAP_000062
azacitidina
CHEBI:2038 ,
4-amino-1-beta-d-ribofuranosyl-s-triazin-2(1h)-one
4-amino-1-beta-d-ribofuranosyl-1,3,5-triazin-2(1h)-one
azacitidinum
pyrimidine antimetabolite: inhibits nucleic acid replication
LOPAC0_000035
SPECTRUM5_001166
NCGC00178234-01
CMAP_000082
IDI1_000125
smr000857239
MLS001333122
MLS001333121
nsc-102816
5-azacytidine
nsc102816 ,
320-67-2
azacitidine
5-azac
4-amino-1-[(2r,3r,4s,5r)-3,4-dihydroxy-5-(hydroxymethyl)tetrahydrofuran-2-yl]-1,3,5-triazin-2-one
4-amino-1-beta-d-ribofuranosyl-1,3,5-triazine-2(1h)-one
NCGC00090851-01
antibiotic u 18496
s-triazin-2(1h)-one, 4-amino-1-beta-d-ribofuranosyl-
u 18496
2-(beta-d-ribofuranosyl)-4-amino-1,3,5-triazin-2-one
azacitidina [inn-spanish]
brn 0620461
ccris 60
azacitidinum [inn-latin]
nsc 102816
hsdb 6879
einecs 206-280-2
wr 183027
wr-183027
4-amino-1-beta-d-ribofuranosyl-1,3,5-traizin-2(1h)-one
5-azacytidine, hybri-max(tm), gamma-irradiated, lyophilized powder, bioxtra, suitable for hybridoma
DB00928
NCGC00090851-04
KBIO2_001742
KBIO2_002556
KBIO2_005124
KBIO2_007692
KBIOSS_001742
KBIO3_002657
KBIOSS_002565
KBIOGR_002556
KBIOGR_001444
KBIO2_004310
KBIO3_003034
KBIO2_006878
SPECTRUM4_000922
SPBIO_000892
SPECTRUM2_000786
SPECTRUM3_001509
NINDS_000125
SPECTRUM1502111
BCBCMAP01_000083
BSPBIO_003157
NCGC00090851-02
NCGC00090851-03
5azac
5-azacitidine
5 azacytidine
HMS2092D08
4-amino-1-(beta-d-ribofuranosyl)-1,3,5-triazin-2(1h)-one; ladakamycin
A 2385 ,
4-amino-1-(beta-d-ribofuranosyl)-1,3,5-triazin-2(1h)-one
NCGC00090851-08
CHEMBL1489
u-18,496
4-amino-1-[(2r,3r,4s,5r)-3,4-dihydroxy-5-(hydroxymethyl)oxolan-2-yl]-1,3,5-triazin-2-one
HMS500G07
nmusyjaqqfhjew-kvtdhhqdsa-
inchi=1/c8h12n4o5/c9-7-10-2-12(8(16)11-7)6-5(15)4(14)3(1-13)17-6/h2-6,13-15h,1h2,(h2,9,11,16)/t3-,4-,5-,6-/m1/s1
4-amino-1-[(2r,3r,4s,5r)-3,4-dihydroxy-5-(hydroxymethyl)oxolan-2-yl]-1,3,5-triaz
HMS1921J22
NCGC00090851-06
NCGC00090851-05
NCGC00090851-07
HMS3260G11
HMS3259D19
NCGC00256541-01
tox21_302985
dtxsid9020116 ,
dtxcid10116
6-amino-3-[(2r,3r,4s,5r)-3,4-dihydroxy-5-(hydroxymethyl)tetrahydrofuran-2-yl]-1h-1,3,5-triazin-3-ium-2-one
A821115
nsc-758186
MLS002548894
nsc758186
pharmakon1600-01502111
tox21_111032
HMS2231F15
CCG-39046
HY-10586
CS-1287
azacitidine [usan:inn:ban]
m801h13nru ,
unii-m801h13nru
SL-000003
nsc 103-627
LP00035
azacitidine [jan]
azacitidine [who-dd]
azacitidine [iarc]
azacitidine [usan]
azacitidine [hsdb]
onureg
azacitidine [vandf]
azacitidine [ema epar]
1,3,5-triazin-2(1h)-one, 4-amino-1-.beta.-d-ribofuranosyl-
azacitidine [usp-rs]
azacitidine [mi]
azacitidine [orange book]
azacitidine [mart.]
azacitidine [inn]
S1782
AKOS015896938
gtpl6796
onureg (cc-486; oral azacitidine)
bdbm50424715
5ae ,
NC00672
AM83944
SCHEMBL3741
tox21_111032_1
NCGC00090851-10
J-700085
NCGC00260720-01
tox21_500035
NMUSYJAQQFHJEW-KVTDHHQDSA-N
4-amino-1-?-d-ribofuranosyl-1,3,5-triazin-2(1h)-one
azacitidine, pharmaceutical secondary standard; certified reference material
HB1374
4-amino-1-beta-d-ribofuranosyl-1,3,5-tr iazin-2(1h)-one
4-amino-1-((2r,3r,4s,5r)-3,4-dihydroxy-5-(hydroxymethyl)tetrahydrofuran-2-yl)-1,3,5-triazin-2(1h)-one
SRI-10756_10
SRI-10756_12
4-amino-1-[(2r,3r,4s,5r)-3,4-dihydroxy-5-(hydroxymethyl)oxolan-2-yl]-1,2-dihydro-1,3,5-triazin-2-one
sr-01000075662
SR-01000075662-1
azacitidine, united states pharmacopeia (usp) reference standard
SR-01000075662-3
SR-01000075662-7
azacitidine (vidaza) ,
1401238-97-8
AS-13697
Q416451
BRD-K03406345-001-27-8
BRD-K03406345-001-02-1
NCGC00090851-22
NCGC00090851-14
F10504
azacitidine (5-azacytidine)
azacitidine for
azacitidine (usp-rs)
azacitidina (inn-spanish)
azacitidinum (inn-latin)
5-acz
azacitidineazacitidine
azacitidine (iarc)
l01bc07
4-amino-1-beta-d-ribofuranosyl-d-triazin-2(1h)-one
azacitidine (mart.)
EN300-118700
Z1515383340

Research Excerpts

Toxicity

Azacitidine injection is associated with characteristic adverse events (AEs) that must be managed in order for patients to stay on therapy and achieve optimal therapeutic outcomes. The most common indications for azac itidine use were myelodysplastic syndrome (48%) and acute myelogenous leukemia (27%)

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" 5-AzadCyd is highly toxic in cultured cells and animals and is utilized as a potent antitumor agent for treatment of certain human cancers."( Toxicity of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine to mammalian cells is mediated primarily by covalent trapping of DNA methyltransferase rather than DNA demethylation.
Jaenisch, R; Jüttermann, R; Li, E, 1994
)
0.29
" The high recombinagenic activity of these two drugs suggests that--despite their therapeutic effects against cancer--a question is raised whether these drugs should be considered for adverse effects in cancer chemotherapy."( Somatic recombination: a major genotoxic effect of two pyrimidine antimetabolitic chemotherapeutic drugs in Drosophila melanogaster.
Cunha, KS; de Andrade, HH; Graf, U; Reguly, ML, 2002
)
0.31
" The reverse order of treatment produced a higher toxic effect than exposure to each prodrug alone."( The DNA methylation inhibitor 5-azacytidine modulates 6-thioguanine toxicity in mammalian cells.
Barbata, G; Caradonna, F; Sciandrello, G, 2003
)
0.32
" Our goal was to see if the assessment of DNA methylation might be a useful tool, when used in conjunction with initial, basic in vitro tests, to provide a more informative preliminary appraisal of the toxic potential of chemicals to prioritize them for further evaluation."( The value of DNA methylation analysis in basic, initial toxicity assessments.
Cockerell, GL; Goodman, JI; McKim, JM; Watson, RE, 2004
)
0.32
" Similar to previous studies, we show that mice that are heterozygous for a nonfunctional Dnmt1 gene are partially protected against the deleterious effects of 5-azaCdR; however, methylation levels are not restored in these mice, suggesting that adverse effects are due to another mechanism(s) in addition to DNA hypomethylation."( Adverse effects of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine on spermatogenesis include reduced sperm function and selective inhibition of de novo DNA methylation.
Kelly, TL; Oakes, CC; Robaire, B; Trasler, JM, 2007
)
0.34
" In conclusion, the combination studied is safe and has significant clinical activity."( Safety and clinical activity of the combination of 5-azacytidine, valproic acid, and all-trans retinoic acid in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome.
Cortes, J; Estey, EH; Estrov, Z; Faderl, S; Garcia-Manero, G; Giles, F; Issa, JP; Kantarjian, HM; Ouzounian, S; Pierce, S; Quezada, A; Ravandi, F; Soriano, AO; Wierda, WG; Yang, H, 2007
)
0.34
" The fluorescence properties of dZeb were used to quantify the amount of this analog incorporated into cellular DNA of mismatch repair-deficient cells expressing Dm-dNK and the results showed that in a mismatch correction-defective strain a high percentage of DNA bases may be replaced with the analog without long term toxic effects."( Use of Drosophila deoxynucleoside kinase to study mechanism of toxicity and mutagenicity of deoxycytidine analogs in Escherichia coli.
Betham, B; Bhagwat, AS; Marquez, VE; Shalhout, S, 2010
)
0.36
" We recorded adverse reactions described in the medical history."( [Effectiveness and safety of 5-azacitidine in three patients with myelodysplastic syndromes].
Cuevas Asencio, I; Gago Sánchez, AI; Garzás-Martín de Almagro, MC; Reyes Malia, M,
)
0.13
"5-Azacitidine might be considered an effective and relatively safe drug, and may have contributed to controlling peripheral cytopenias, improving the quality of life and delaying progression to leukaemia."( [Effectiveness and safety of 5-azacitidine in three patients with myelodysplastic syndromes].
Cuevas Asencio, I; Gago Sánchez, AI; Garzás-Martín de Almagro, MC; Reyes Malia, M,
)
0.13
" We present previously unpublished data from two large phase III trials describing common adverse events (AEs) associated with azacitidine and methods to manage them."( Management and supportive care measures for adverse events in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes treated with azacitidine*.
Backstrom, J; Beach, CL; Fenaux, P; Gore, SD; Hellström-Lindberg, E; List, A; Mufti, GJ; Santini, V; Seymour, JF; Silverman, LR, 2010
)
0.36
" An understanding of structure-activity relationships (SARs) of chemicals can make a significant contribution to the identification of potential toxic effects early in the drug development process and aid in avoiding such problems."( Developing structure-activity relationships for the prediction of hepatotoxicity.
Fisk, L; Greene, N; Naven, RT; Note, RR; Patel, ML; Pelletier, DJ, 2010
)
0.36
" It appears to be well tolerated, with the most common adverse effects being myelosuppression."( Safety and efficacy of azacitidine in myelodysplastic syndromes.
Garcia-Manero, G; Martin-Santos, T; Vigil, CE, 2010
)
0.36
" This requires a good control of the adverse effects of the drug, which are primarily in the first cycles of treatment."( Adverse effects of azacitidine: onset, duration, and treatment.
Martínez-Francés, A, 2011
)
0.37
" Common adverse events included fatigue, injection site reactions, constipation, nausea, pruritus and febrile neutropenia."( Safety, efficacy and biological predictors of response to sequential azacitidine and lenalidomide for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia.
Abdel-Wahab, O; Berube, C; Bhattacharya, S; Coutre, S; Figueroa, ME; Gallegos, L; Gotlib, JR; Kohrt, HE; Levine, R; Liedtke, M; Medeiros, BC; Melnick, A; Mitchell, BS; Pollyea, DA; Zehnder, J; Zhang, B, 2012
)
0.38
" Serum ferritin (SF) was measured monthly, and safety assessment included monitoring of adverse events during treatment and of liver and renal parameters."( Deferasirox treatment for myelodysplastic syndromes: "real-life" efficacy and safety in a single-institution patient population.
Alimena, G; Breccia, M; Colafigli, G; Federico, V; Finsinger, P; Latagliata, R; Loglisci, G; Petrucci, L; Salaroli, A; Santopietro, M; Serrao, A, 2012
)
0.38
" In an attempt to design an efficacious and safe prehematopoietic stem cell transplantation conditioning regimen, we investigated the cytotoxicity of the combination of busulfan (B), melphalan (M), and gemcitabine (G) in lymphoma cell lines in the absence or presence of drugs that induce epigenetic changes."( Epigenetic modifiers enhance the synergistic cytotoxicity of combined nucleoside analog-DNA alkylating agents in lymphoma cell lines.
Andersson, BS; Champlin, RE; Li, Y; Murray, D; Nieto, Y; Valdez, BC; Wang, G, 2012
)
0.38
" Our findings suggest that 5'-aza-dC modulating DNA methylation could sensitize paraquat toxic effects on PC12 cell by oxidative stress increment and mitochondrial deficit."( 5'-Aza-dC sensitizes paraquat toxic effects on PC12 cell.
Ba, M; Kong, M; Liang, H; Ma, L; Wang, Y; Yu, Q; Yu, T, 2012
)
0.38
" Azacitidine injection is associated with characteristic adverse events (AEs) that must be managed in order for patients to stay on therapy and achieve optimal therapeutic outcomes."( Counselling and adverse event management for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes undergoing azacitidine therapy: a practice standard for Canadian nurses.
Hua-Yung, C; Kurtin, S; Murray, C; Nixon, S; von Riedemann, S; Wereley, A, 2012
)
0.38
" Neutropenia was the most common grade 3-4 adverse event."( Effectiveness and safety of different azacitidine dosage regimens in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes or acute myeloid leukemia.
Andreu, R; Badiella, L; Bailén, A; Bargay, J; Brunet, S; Casaño, J; de Miguel, D; Falantes, JF; Figueredo, A; García-Delgado, R; González, JR; Jurado, AF; Medina, A; Ramos, F; Sanz, G; Tormo, M, 2014
)
0.4
"Thrombocytopenia is an independent adverse prognostic factor in patients with Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)."( A pilot phase I dose finding safety study of the thrombopoietin-receptor agonist, eltrombopag, in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome treated with azacitidine.
Cherif, H; Chowdhury, O; Garelius, H; Hellström-Lindberg, E; Jacobsen, SE; Lorenz, F; Saft, L; Svensson, T, 2014
)
0.4
" Severe adverse events included infectious complications, deep vein thrombosis and transient ischaemic attack."( A pilot phase I dose finding safety study of the thrombopoietin-receptor agonist, eltrombopag, in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome treated with azacitidine.
Cherif, H; Chowdhury, O; Garelius, H; Hellström-Lindberg, E; Jacobsen, SE; Lorenz, F; Saft, L; Svensson, T, 2014
)
0.4
" Decitabine was tolerated at all doses administered, and grade 3 or 4 toxic effects included non-life-threatening hepatotoxicity and hyperglycaemia."( Safety and clinical activity of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (decitabine) with or without Hyper-CVAD in relapsed/refractory acute lymphocytic leukaemia.
Benton, CB; Borthakur, G; Dara, S; Franklin, AR; Garcia-Manero, G; Jabbour, E; Kantarjian, H; Kwari, M; O'Brien, S; Pierce, SR; Ravandi, F; Rytting, M; Thomas, DA; Yang, H, 2014
)
0.4
" Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), including treatment-related TEAEs, and serious TEAEs (TESAEs) were recorded throughout the study."( Safety and efficacy of azacitidine in Belgian patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes, acute myeloid leukaemia, or chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia: results of a real-life, non-interventional post-marketing survey.
Beguin, Y; Bries, G; Deeren, D; Graux, C; Meers, S; Mineur, P; Noens, L; Potier, H; Ravoet, C; Selleslag, D; Theunissen, K; Trullemans, F; Voelter, V; Vrelust, I, 2015
)
0.42
" The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were febrile neutropenia (38 [41%] of 93 patients), pneumonia (27 [29%] of 93 patients), thrombocytopenia (23 [25%] of 93 patients), anaemia (23 [25%] of 93 patients), and sepsis (16 [17%] of 93 patients)."( Safety and tolerability of guadecitabine (SGI-110) in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia: a multicentre, randomised, dose-escalation phase 1 study.
Azab, M; Chung, W; Daver, N; Griffiths, EA; Hao, Y; Issa, JJ; Jabbour, E; Kantarjian, H; Lowder, JN; Naim, S; O'Connell, C; Oganesian, A; Rizzieri, D; Roboz, G; Stock, W; Taverna, P; Tibes, R; Walsh, K; Yee, K, 2015
)
0.42
"1 nm) for 24 hours pretreatment with or without methyltransferase inhibitor 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine and the reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenger α-lipoic acid to assess the possible role of methylation and ROS in the toxic effect of TNPs."( Cross talk between poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 methylation and oxidative stress involved in the toxic effect of anatase titanium dioxide nanoparticles.
Bai, W; Chen, Y; Gao, A, 2015
)
0.42
" The most common non-hematological adverse events were neutropenia in 21 patients and thrombocytopenia in 17 patients."( Efficacy and safety of a 5-day regimen of azacitidine for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.
Fujimaki, K; Kawasaki, R; Miyashita, K; Tomita, N, 2016
)
0.43
"Relative risks of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and related hospitalization is most accurate when accounting for treatment exposure."( Incidence rates of treatment-emergent adverse events and related hospitalization are reduced with azacitidine compared with conventional care regimens in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia.
Beach, CL; Döhner, H; Dombret, H; Dougherty, D; Gambini, D; Minden, MD; Seymour, JF; Stone, R; Weaver, J, 2017
)
0.46
" Most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (52%) and leukopenia (39%)."( Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous azacitidine in Taiwanese patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.
Beach, CL; Chen, TY; Chen, YC; Chou, WC; Dong, Q; Galettis, A; Hsiao, LT; Laille, E; Lin, SF; Songer, S; Yeh, SP, 2017
)
0.46
" Safety was evaluated based on treatment related grades 3-4 adverse events (AEs) and early death (ED) rate."( Efficacy and safety of decitabine in treatment of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
He, PF; Lian, XY; Lin, J; Ma, JC; Qian, J; Wen, XM; Xu, ZJ; Yao, DM; Zhang, ZH; Zhou, JD, 2017
)
0.46
" Hence, NIC could exacerbate adverse effects of AZA while antioxidants such as resveratrol (RES) could prevent it."( Nicotine Exposure Augments Renal Toxicity of 5-aza-cytidine Through p66shc: Prevention by Resveratrol.
Arany, I; Dixit, M; Faisal, A; Hall, S, 2017
)
0.46
"RES can protect the kidney from adverse effects of NIC in patients undergoing anticancer therapy."( Nicotine Exposure Augments Renal Toxicity of 5-aza-cytidine Through p66shc: Prevention by Resveratrol.
Arany, I; Dixit, M; Faisal, A; Hall, S, 2017
)
0.46
" In addressing key issues of reducing toxic side effects and improving pharmacokinetic profiles of the therapeutic agents, we have developed a new formulation by co-packaging DAC and ATO into alendronate-conjugated bone-targeting nanoparticles (BTNPs)."( Bone-targeting nanoparticle to co-deliver decitabine and arsenic trioxide for effective therapy of myelodysplastic syndrome with low systemic toxicity.
Ferrari, M; Hu, Z; Nizzero, S; Ramirez, MR; Shen, H; Shi, C; Wu, X; Zhang, G; Zhou, J, 2017
)
0.46
"Azacitidine was safe and effective in Chinese patients with HR-MDS."( Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous azacitidine in Chinese patients with higher risk myelodysplastic syndromes: Results from a multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase 2 study.
Beach, CL; Dong, Q; Du, X; Hu, Y; Jin, J; Lai, YY; Laille, E; Li, X; Liu, T; Shen, ZX; Songer, S; Sun, A; Xiao, Z; Yu, L, 2018
)
0.48
" The main adverse reaction was hematological toxicity."( [The safety of decitabine as bridging pretreatment regimen before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in pediatric hematological malignancies].
Bian, XN; Fan, LY; Hu, SY; Kong, LJ; Li, J; Ling, J; Liu, H; Lu, J; Xiao, PF; Yao, YH, 2018
)
0.48
" The anti-tumor effect and DNA demethylation effect of OR-2003 and OR-2100 were comparable to that of DAC with fewer adverse effects in vivo."( Novel prodrugs of decitabine with greater metabolic stability and less toxicity.
Hattori, N; Iida, N; Kimura, K; Kono, Y; Nakata, Y; Sako, M; Takeshima, H; Ushijima, T, 2019
)
0.51
" These compounds are expected to overcome the difficulty in achieving stable pharmacokinetics in patients, leading to maximum DNA demethylation activity with minimum adverse effects."( Novel prodrugs of decitabine with greater metabolic stability and less toxicity.
Hattori, N; Iida, N; Kimura, K; Kono, Y; Nakata, Y; Sako, M; Takeshima, H; Ushijima, T, 2019
)
0.51
" The therapentic efficacy and adverse reactions during treatment were compared between 2 groups."( [Efficacy and Safety of Decitabine Combined with Half-Course Pre-excitation for the Treatment of Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia].
Kong, R; Liu, Q; Qiu, HC; Wang, Y; Wu, DH; Wu, PF; Zhang, XL, 2019
)
0.51
" The rate of adverse reactions of digestive tract in combined therapy group was 40."( [Efficacy and Safety of Decitabine Combined with Half-Course Pre-excitation for the Treatment of Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia].
Kong, R; Liu, Q; Qiu, HC; Wang, Y; Wu, DH; Wu, PF; Zhang, XL, 2019
)
0.51
"Combination of disitamine and half-course prestimulation treatmentis is a safe and effective and elderly patients with AML shown a good tolerance."( [Efficacy and Safety of Decitabine Combined with Half-Course Pre-excitation for the Treatment of Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia].
Kong, R; Liu, Q; Qiu, HC; Wang, Y; Wu, DH; Wu, PF; Zhang, XL, 2019
)
0.51
" In hematology, the incidence of AZA-induced cutaneous adverse events (AE) has been known to be relatively high, which has not been well recognized by dermatologists."( Cutaneous adverse events induced by azacitidine in myelodysplastic syndrome patients: Case reports and a lesson from published work review.
Mizukawa, Y; Ohyama, M; Shimoda-Komatsu, Y; Takayama, N, 2020
)
0.56
" The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (eight [32%] of 25 patients) and hyponatraemia (five [20%])."( Safety and activity of selinexor in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes or oligoblastic acute myeloid leukaemia refractory to hypomethylating agents: a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 trial.
Abdel-Wahab, O; Alvarez, K; Chung, SS; Gönen, M; Klimek, VM; Mi, X; Paffenholz, SV; Park, JH; Penson, AV; Rampal, RK; Sen, F; Sigler, A; Stein, EM; Tallman, MS; Taylor, J, 2020
)
0.56
" Adverse events were manageable with supportive care implementation."( Safety and activity of selinexor in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes or oligoblastic acute myeloid leukaemia refractory to hypomethylating agents: a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 trial.
Abdel-Wahab, O; Alvarez, K; Chung, SS; Gönen, M; Klimek, VM; Mi, X; Paffenholz, SV; Park, JH; Penson, AV; Rampal, RK; Sen, F; Sigler, A; Stein, EM; Tallman, MS; Taylor, J, 2020
)
0.56
" Reviewed here are common adverse events (AEs) during oral azacitidine treatment in QUAZAR AML-001, and practical recommendations for AE management based on guidance from international cancer consortiums, regulatory authorities, and the authors' clinical experience treating patients in the trial."( Management of adverse events in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in remission receiving oral azacitidine: experience from the phase 3 randomized QUAZAR AML-001 trial.
Bailey, R; Beach, CL; Chevassut, T; Döhner, H; Dombret, H; Figuera-Alvarez, A; Hiwase, D; La Torre, I; Montesinos, P; Musso, M; Pierdomenico, F; Pocock, C; Ravandi, F; Roboz, GJ; Safah, H; Sayar, H; Selleslag, D; Skikne, B; Sohn, SK; Tse, W; Wei, AH; Zhong, J, 2021
)
0.62
" Although arthralgia is common side effect associated with hypomethylating agents, arthritis has not been reported previously."( Recurrent arthritis as an unexpected side effect associated with azacitidine in a patient with myelodysplastic syndrome.
Alhan, FN; Ataş, Ü; Boduroğlu, A; Doğan, Ö; Iltar, U; Salim, O; Sözel, H; Ündar, L; Vural, E; Yücel, OK, 2022
)
0.72
" The most common adverse drug reaction (ADR) was injection site reactions (ISR; 91."( Phase 1/2 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of DSP-7888 dosing emulsion in myelodysplastic syndromes.
Aakashi, K; Aotsuka, N; Fujita, J; Goto, M; Iwasaki, H; Kizaki, M; Matsumura, I; Miyazaki, Y; Nakazato, T; Naoe, T; Sekiguchi, N; Sugimoto, S; Takahara-Matsubara, M; Ueda, Y; Usuki, K, 2022
)
0.72
"A pharmacovigilance analysis was performed using the FDA Adverse Event Database."( Safety Signal between Azacitidine and Pericarditis.
Aggarwal, P; Chu, B; Venkatakrishnan, A, 2023
)
0.91
" The most common indications for azacitidine use in the adverse event reports were myelodysplastic syndrome (48%) and acute myelogenous leukemia (27%)."( Safety Signal between Azacitidine and Pericarditis.
Aggarwal, P; Chu, B; Venkatakrishnan, A, 2023
)
0.91
" Data on adverse events were available for 67 patients (67/116, 57."( How to treat VEXAS syndrome: a systematic review on effectiveness and safety of current treatment strategies.
Boyadzhieva, Z; Kötter, I; Krusche, M; Ruffer, N, 2023
)
0.91
" Adverse events remain a challenge, especially an elevated risk for venous thromboembolism associated to JAKi treatment should be carefully considered."( How to treat VEXAS syndrome: a systematic review on effectiveness and safety of current treatment strategies.
Boyadzhieva, Z; Kötter, I; Krusche, M; Ruffer, N, 2023
)
0.91
" In clinical trials, hematologic toxicity and infection have been observed as adverse events (AEs) of this drug."( Adverse Event Profile of Azacitidine: Analysis by Route of Administration Using Japanese Pharmacovigilance Database.
Fujiwara, M; Muroi, N; Shimizu, T; Uchida, M; Uesawa, Y; Yamaoka, K, 2023
)
0.91

Pharmacokinetics

Azacitidine pharmacokinetic parameters in adolescent patients with renal compromise are not available from the medical literature. Subjects demonstrated measurable plasma concentrations of azacitidine.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"A phase I trial and pharmacokinetic study of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dCyd) were conducted in 21 patients with advanced solid tumors."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (NSC 127716) in cancer patients.
Gall, HE; Leyva, A; O'Brien, AM; Pinedo, HM; van Groeningen, CJ, 1986
)
0.27
" Four adult male rhesus monkeys were given single 10 mg intrathecal (n = 1) or intraventricular (n = 3) doses of AAC to determine its acute toxicity and pharmacokinetic parameters."( Cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics and toxicology of intraventricular and intrathecal arabinosyl-5-azacytosine (fazarabine, NSC 281272) in the nonhuman primate.
Balis, FM; Heideman, RL; McCully, C; Poplack, DG,
)
0.13
"To characterize the pharmacokinetic behavior of 5-azacitidine (5-AC), a cytidine nucleoside analog, when given with phenylbutyrate, a histone deaceytlase inhibitor."( Pharmacokinetics of 5-azacitidine administered with phenylbutyrate in patients with refractory solid tumors or hematologic malignancies.
Baker, SD; Carducci, MA; Gilbert, J; Gore, SD; Hartke, C; He, P; Rudek, MA; Zhao, M, 2005
)
0.33
" Sufficient 5-AC exposure is achieved to produce pharmacodynamic effects in tumors."( Pharmacokinetics of 5-azacitidine administered with phenylbutyrate in patients with refractory solid tumors or hematologic malignancies.
Baker, SD; Carducci, MA; Gilbert, J; Gore, SD; Hartke, C; He, P; Rudek, MA; Zhao, M, 2005
)
0.33
" This has greatly limited application of pharmacokinetic assays to clinical development of decitabine."( Characterization of decomposition products and preclinical and low dose clinical pharmacokinetics of decitabine (5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine) by a new liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry quantification method.
Byrd, JC; Chan, KK; Grever, M; Liu, Z; Marcucci, G; Xiao, J, 2006
)
0.33
"Azacitidine pharmacokinetic parameters in adolescent patients with renal compromise are not available from the medical literature."( Azacitidine pharmacokinetics in an adolescent patient with renal compromise.
Dalal, J; Gonzalez, C; Kearns, GL; Peters, C; Tsao, CF, 2007
)
0.34
" The mean values for terminal phase elimination half-life (0."( Pharmacokinetics of decitabine administered as a 3-h infusion to patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).
Cashen, AF; DiPersio, J; Fisher, N; Shah, AK; Todt, L, 2008
)
0.35
" Pharmacodynamic analyses included 5-methyl-2'-deoxycytidine levels, MAGE1A CpG island methylation, and fetal hemoglobin (HbF) expression."( Phase I and pharmacodynamic trial of the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor decitabine and carboplatin in solid tumors.
Appleton, K; Barrett, S; Bellenger, K; Brown, R; Jadayel, D; Judson, I; Kaye, SB; Lee, C; Mackay, HJ; Mackay, L; McCormick, C; Plumb, JA; Reade, S; Schätzlein, A; Setanoians, A; Strathdee, G; Tang, A; Twelves, C, 2007
)
0.34
" pharmacokinetic data on 670 drugs representing, to our knowledge, the largest publicly available set of human clinical pharmacokinetic data."( Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
Lombardo, F; Obach, RS; Waters, NJ, 2008
)
0.35
" The authors review the pharmacokinetic data gained from low-dose decitabine, as well as the clinical progress of decitabine in the treatment of hematologic malignancies."( Pharmacokinetic evaluation of decitabine for the treatment of leukemia.
Bryan, J; Garcia-Manero, G; Jabbour, E; Kantarjian, H, 2011
)
0.37
" Pharmacodynamic analysis showed FLT3 down-regulation on day 26 of cycle 1 (P = ."( Clinical and pharmacodynamic activity of bortezomib and decitabine in acute myeloid leukemia.
Bloomfield, CD; Blum, W; Byrd, JC; Caligiuri, MA; Chan, KK; Curfman, JP; Devine, SM; Eisfeld, AK; Garr, C; Garzon, R; Geyer, S; Grever, MR; Jacob, S; Kefauver, C; Klisovic, R; Marcucci, G; Perrotti, D; Santhanam, R; Schwind, S; Tarighat, SS; Walker, A; Wang, H; Whitman, S, 2012
)
0.38
" We developed a pharmacodynamic model to characterize the interaction between CLO and DEC on an AML cell line and down-regulated p53R2 protein to understand its role."( Synergism between clofarabine and decitabine through p53R2: a pharmacodynamic drug-drug interaction modeling.
Fetterly, GJ; Ghoshal, S; Haese, JP; Karpf, AR; Thudium, KE; Wetzler, M, 2012
)
0.38
" Under fed condition, Tmax was delayed ∼1."( Pharmacokinetics of different formulations of oral azacitidine (CC-486) and the effect of food and modified gastric pH on pharmacokinetics in subjects with hematologic malignancies.
Boyd, TE; Dong, Q; Laille, E; Savona, MR; Scott, BL; Skikne, B, 2014
)
0.4
" Terminal half-life and time to maximum plasma concentration were comparable between groups."( A phase I study in patients with solid or hematologic malignancies of the dose proportionality of subcutaneous Azacitidine and its pharmacokinetics in patients with severe renal impairment.
Beach, CL; Gabrail, NY; Goel, S; Kelly, K; Laille, E; Liu, L; Mita, AC; Songer, S, 2014
)
0.4
" Part B was designed to evaluate the relative contribution of belinostat to the combination based on analysis of pharmacodynamic markers, and incorporated a design in which patients were randomized during cycle 1 to AZA alone, or the combination, at the maximally tolerated dose of belinostat."( A phase I and pharmacodynamic study of the histone deacetylase inhibitor belinostat plus azacitidine in advanced myeloid neoplasia.
Bennett, M; Fulton, N; Godley, LA; Green, M; Halpern, A; Karrison, T; Koval, G; Larson, RA; Madzo, J; Malnassy, G; Mattison, RJ; Odenike, O; Ratain, MJ; Stock, W; Yee, KW, 2015
)
0.42
" Reported here are the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles of CC-486 extended dosing schedules in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) from part 2 of this study."( Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics with Extended Dosing of CC-486 in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies.
Cogle, CR; Garcia-Manero, G; Gore, SD; Hetzer, J; Kumar, K; Laille, E; MacBeth, KJ; Shi, T; Skikne, B, 2015
)
0.42
" In the single dose pharmacokinetic study, Aza concentrations in peripheral blood and lungs were measured by LC-MS method."( Toxicity and Pharmacokinetic Studies of Aerosolized Clinical Grade Azacitidine.
Liang, Y; Perez-Soler, R; Qiu, X; Sellers, RS; Zou, Y, 2016
)
0.43
"In pharmacokinetic study, aerosolized Aza was found to deposit mainly into the lung with very little drug detected in the circulation."( Toxicity and Pharmacokinetic Studies of Aerosolized Clinical Grade Azacitidine.
Liang, Y; Perez-Soler, R; Qiu, X; Sellers, RS; Zou, Y, 2016
)
0.43
"Clinical and pharmacokinetic effects of azacitidine in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes were established in mainly Caucasian populations."( Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous azacitidine in Taiwanese patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.
Beach, CL; Chen, TY; Chen, YC; Chou, WC; Dong, Q; Galettis, A; Hsiao, LT; Laille, E; Lin, SF; Songer, S; Yeh, SP, 2017
)
0.46
" Pharmacokinetic profiles were similar for Taiwanese (N = 12) and North American (N = 45) patients."( Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous azacitidine in Taiwanese patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.
Beach, CL; Chen, TY; Chen, YC; Chou, WC; Dong, Q; Galettis, A; Hsiao, LT; Laille, E; Lin, SF; Songer, S; Yeh, SP, 2017
)
0.46
"Inhaled dry powder 5AZA showed superior pharmacokinetic properties in lung, liver, brain and blood compared to the injected formulation and for all tissues except lung compared to an inhaled aqueous formulation."( 5-Azacytidine inhaled dry powder formulation profoundly improves pharmacokinetics and efficacy for lung cancer therapy through genome reprogramming.
Badenoch, A; Belinsky, SA; Burke, M; Dubose, D; Dye, WW; Grimes, MJ; Kuehl, PJ; Mallis, LM; March, TH; Picchi, MA; Revelli, DA; Sniegowski, T; Tellez, CS; Tessema, M; Vodak, DT, 2020
)
0.56
" We report a novel trial design to efficiently evaluate investigational therapies with a primary pharmacodynamic endpoint."( A feasibility study of combined epigenetic and vaccine therapy in advanced colorectal cancer with pharmacodynamic endpoint.
Ahuja, N; Anders, RA; Azad, NS; Bever, KM; Christmas, B; Diaz Rivera, EA; Jaffee, EM; Judkins, C; Liu, M; Nauroth, JM; Rosner, GL; Thomas, DL; Thompson, ED; Zhang, J; Zheng, L; Zhu, Q, 2021
)
0.62
" This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model to characterize oral-AZA concentration-time profiles in patients with AML, myelodysplastic syndrome, or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia."( Population Pharmacokinetics of Oral Azacitidine, and Exposure-Response Analysis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Bailey, R; Beach, CL; Gaudy, A; Laille, E; Skikne, B; Zhou, S, 2023
)
0.91

Compound-Compound Interactions

Azacitidine (AZA) is a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor and epigenetic modulator. It can be an effective agent in combination with chemotherapy for patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML)

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Because of the potentially large antigen load released by such a cell kill, the immune modulator pyran copolymer was also tested in combination with DAC."( Effects of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine in combination with the biochemical modulator thymidine or the immune modulator pyran copolymer on L1210 leukemia-bearing mice.
Covey, JM; Zaharko, DS, 1984
)
0.27
"The cytotoxicity of vincristine (VCR), beta-cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C), or adriamycin (ADRIA) in combination with 5-azacytidine (Aza-CR) to L1210 leukemia in vivo was measured to determine if schedule-dependent synergistic or antagonistic drug interaction occurred."( Chemotherapy of L1210 leukemia with 5-azacytidine in combination with vincristine, adriamycin, or beta-cytosine arabinoside.
Coulter, DM; Presant, CA; Valeriote, F; Vietti, TJ, 1981
)
0.26
" Since most clinical regimens for tumor therapy consist of several drugs, we investigated the antineoplastic action of Ado in combination with 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5-Aza-CdR), a potent inhibitor of DNA methylation or cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C), a potent inhibitor of DNA synthesis."( Evaluation of the antineoplastic activity of adozelesin alone and in combination with 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine and cytosine arabinoside on DLD-1 human colon carcinoma cells.
Côté, S; Momparler, RL, 1993
)
0.29
"5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine combined with either amsacrine or idarubicin has been applied in a treatment protocol for patients with a relapse of acute myeloid or lymphocytic leukemia."( A randomized phase II study on the effects of 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine combined with either amsacrine or idarubicin in patients with relapsed acute leukemia: an EORTC Leukemia Cooperative Group phase II study (06893).
Archimbaud, E; Berneman, Z; Dardenne, M; Dohner, H; Jaksic, B; Jehn, U; Labar, B; Louwagie, EA; Muus, P; Stryckmans, P; Suciu, S; Tjean, M; Wijermans, P; Willemze, R; Zittoun, R, 1997
)
0.3
" However, in XRS-5 cells, the drug combination caused a significant increase in the aberrations induced in those chromosomes, but with a concomitant reduction in the randomly induced-aberrations."( Chromosomal aberrations induced by 5-azacytidine combined with VP-16 (etoposide) in CHO-K1 and XRS-5 cell lines.
Cardoso, RS; Dias, FL; Guimarães, AP; Kronka, SN; Sakamoto-Hojo, ET, 2003
)
0.32
" In this study, we show for the first time that VPA, in combination with RA and the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (Aza-dC), can overcome the epigenetic barriers to transcription of a prototypical silenced tumor suppressor gene, RARbeta2, in human breast cancer cells."( Valproic acid, in combination with all-trans retinoic acid and 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine, restores expression of silenced RARbeta2 in breast cancer cells.
Gudas, LJ; Mongan, NP, 2005
)
0.33
"To characterize the pharmacokinetic behavior of 5-azacitidine (5-AC), a cytidine nucleoside analog, when given with phenylbutyrate, a histone deaceytlase inhibitor."( Pharmacokinetics of 5-azacitidine administered with phenylbutyrate in patients with refractory solid tumors or hematologic malignancies.
Baker, SD; Carducci, MA; Gilbert, J; Gore, SD; Hartke, C; He, P; Rudek, MA; Zhao, M, 2005
)
0.33
" 5-AC at doses ranging from 10 to 75 mg/m2/d was administered once daily as a subcutaneous injection for 5 to 21 days in combination with phenylbutyrate administered as a continuous intravenous infusion for varying dose and duration every 28 or 35 days."( Pharmacokinetics of 5-azacitidine administered with phenylbutyrate in patients with refractory solid tumors or hematologic malignancies.
Baker, SD; Carducci, MA; Gilbert, J; Gore, SD; Hartke, C; He, P; Rudek, MA; Zhao, M, 2005
)
0.33
" These findings suggest that 5-aza-CdR is a promising chemotherapeutical agent for gastric carcinomas, in combination with the anticancer drugs SN38 and GEM, in apoptosis signaling."( Synergic antiproliferative effect of DNA methyltransferase inhibitor in combination with anticancer drugs in gastric carcinoma.
Hirakawa, K; Ohira, M; Ren, J; Yashiro, M; Zhang, X, 2006
)
0.33
" A Phase II study was performed on low-dose decitabine, a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor, in combination with imatinib in patients with CML in accelerated phase (AP) and myeloid blastic phase (BP)."( Phase II study of low-dose decitabine in combination with imatinib mesylate in patients with accelerated or myeloid blastic phase of chronic myelogenous leukemia.
Cortes, J; Garcia-Manero, G; Gharibyan, V; Issa, JP; Jones, D; Kantarjian, HM; Morris, GM; O'brien, S; Oki, Y; Verstovsek, S, 2007
)
0.34
"To determine an optimal biologic dose (OBD) of decitabine as a single agent and then the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of valproic acid (VA) combined with decitabine in acute myeloid leukemia (AML)."( Phase I study of decitabine alone or in combination with valproic acid in acute myeloid leukemia.
Blum, W; Byrd, JC; Chan, KK; Devine, H; Devine, SM; Grever, MR; Hackanson, B; Heerema, NA; Huynh, L; Kefauver, C; Klisovic, RB; Liu, S; Liu, Z; Lozanski, G; Marcucci, G; Murgo, A; Plass, C; Vukosavljevic, T, 2007
)
0.34
" HL-60 and T24 cancer cell lines were treated with azacitidine or decitabine in combination with HC and DNA methylation of LRE1, MAGEA1 and CDKN2A was quantitatively measured by bisulphite-polymerase chain reaction pyrosequencing."( Hydroxycarbamide in combination with azacitidine or decitabine is antagonistic on DNA methylation inhibition.
Byun, HM; Choi, SH; Issa, JP; Kwan, JM; Yang, AS, 2007
)
0.34
" These results indicate that decitabine in combination with gemtuzumab is a regimen of promising efficacy worthy of further investigation in controlled trials."( Decitabine combined with fractionated gemtuzumab ozogamicin therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.
Chowdhury, S; Marks, PW; Seropian, S, 2009
)
0.35
"This was a phase I trial to determine the minimal effective dose and optimal dose schedule for 5-azacytidine (5-AC) in combination with sodium phenylbutyrate in patients with refractory solid tumors."( A phase I dose-finding study of 5-azacytidine in combination with sodium phenylbutyrate in patients with refractory solid tumors.
Ambinder, RF; Baker, SD; Carducci, MA; Donehower, RC; Gilbert, J; Gore, S; Herman, JG; Jiemjit, A; Lin, J; Rudek, MA; Zhao, M; Zwiebel, JA, 2009
)
0.35
" Azacitidine in combination with histone deacetylase inhibitors might offer better efficacy by modulating the methylation and acetylation states of silenced genes."( Hypomethylating agents in myelodysplastic syndromes changing the inevitable: the value of azacitidine as maintenance therapy, effects on transfusion and combination with other agents.
Silverman, LR, 2009
)
0.35
" On the basis of preclinical studies indicating that hypomethylating agents can reverse platinum resistance in ovarian cancer cells, the authors conducted a phase 1 trial of low-dose decitabine combined with carboplatin in patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer."( A phase 1 and pharmacodynamic study of decitabine in combination with carboplatin in patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant, epithelial ovarian cancer.
Balch, C; Breen, T; Fang, F; Kulesavage, C; Li, L; Matei, DE; Nephew, KP; Schilder, J; Shen, C; Snyder, AJ; Zhang, S, 2010
)
0.36
"Repetitive low-dose decitabine is tolerated when combined with carboplatin in ovarian cancer patients, and demonstrates biological (ie, DNA-hypomethylating) activity, justifying further testing for clinical efficacy."( A phase 1 and pharmacodynamic study of decitabine in combination with carboplatin in patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant, epithelial ovarian cancer.
Balch, C; Breen, T; Fang, F; Kulesavage, C; Li, L; Matei, DE; Nephew, KP; Schilder, J; Shen, C; Snyder, AJ; Zhang, S, 2010
)
0.36
"To investigate the impact of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine(5-aza-CdR) combined with imatinib on the proliferation, motility, invasion, and apoptosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GIST) cells in vitro."( [Therapeutic effect of in vitro 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine combined with imatinib on gastrointestinal stromal tumor].
Liang, G; Liang, JF; Wu, LN; Xiao, H; Zhao, YZ; Zheng, HX, 2012
)
0.38
" These results indicate that 2,4-D pulse combined with AzaC improves SE induction."( 5-Azacytidine combined with 2,4-D improves somatic embryogenesis of Acca sellowiana (O. Berg) Burret by means of changes in global DNA methylation levels.
Caprestano, CA; Fraga, HP; Guerra, MP; Micke, GA; Pescador, R; Spudeit, DA; Steinmacher, DA; Vieira, LN, 2012
)
0.38
"5-Azacytidine combined with 2,4-D increases the number of Acca sellowiana somatic embryos."( 5-Azacytidine combined with 2,4-D improves somatic embryogenesis of Acca sellowiana (O. Berg) Burret by means of changes in global DNA methylation levels.
Caprestano, CA; Fraga, HP; Guerra, MP; Micke, GA; Pescador, R; Spudeit, DA; Steinmacher, DA; Vieira, LN, 2012
)
0.38
" Patients were treated with escalating doses of decitabine (5-15 mg/m(2)) IV for 10 days in combination with VPA (10-20 mg/kg/day) PO on days 5-21 of a 28-day cycle."( Phase I study of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine in combination with valproic acid in non-small-cell lung cancer.
Aimiuwu, J; Chan, KK; Chu, BF; Grever, MR; Karpenko, MJ; Liu, Z; Otterson, GA; Villalona-Calero, MA, 2013
)
0.39
" We hypothesized that epigenetic modulators will reverse chemotherapy resistance, and in this article, we report studies that sought to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), safety, and efficacy of decitabine (DAC) combined with TMZ."( Safety and efficacy of decitabine in combination with temozolomide in metastatic melanoma: a phase I/II study and pharmacokinetic analysis.
Beumer, JH; Buch, SC; Christner, S; Egorin, MJ; Kirkwood, JM; Lin, Y; Moschos, S; Tarhini, AA; Tawbi, HA, 2013
)
0.39
"This study was aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of low methylation drug decitabine combined with autologous cytokine induced killer cells (CIK) to treat the elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML)."( [Curative effect of decitabine combined with cytokine-induced killer cells in two elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia].
Cai, LL; Chang, C; Fan, H; Guo, B; Han, WD; Li, SX; Lin, J; Liu, Y; Lu, XC; Ran, HH; Wang, Y; Yang, B; Yang, Y; Zhai, B; Zhang, F; Zhang, L; Zhu, HL, 2013
)
0.39
" We conducted a study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of decitabine (a hypomethylating agent) in combination with panitumumab (mAb against EGFR) in mCRC patients."( A phase I/II study of decitabine in combination with panitumumab in patients with wild-type (wt) KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
Boucher, K; Burr, L; Davidson, C; Garrido-Laguna, I; Gilcrease, W; Jakubowski, L; Jones, D; McGregor, KA; Morrell, G; Olpin, JD; Sharma, S; Soldi, R; Wade, M; Weis, J, 2013
)
0.39
" Future studies evaluating hypomethylating agents in combination with EGFR mAb in patients with mCRC are warranted."( A phase I/II study of decitabine in combination with panitumumab in patients with wild-type (wt) KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
Boucher, K; Burr, L; Davidson, C; Garrido-Laguna, I; Gilcrease, W; Jakubowski, L; Jones, D; McGregor, KA; Morrell, G; Olpin, JD; Sharma, S; Soldi, R; Wade, M; Weis, J, 2013
)
0.39
" Sequential treatment with azacitidine and valproic acid (VPA) in combination with carboplatin may overcome resistance to platinum-based therapy, and we conducted a phase I trial to assess safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and clinical correlates."( Methylation and histone deacetylase inhibition in combination with platinum treatment in patients with advanced malignancies.
Bustinza-Linares, E; Falchook, GS; Fu, S; Hong, DS; Hu, W; Kurzrock, R; Moulder, S; Naing, A; Parkhurst, KL; Sood, AK; Wheler, JJ, 2013
)
0.39
" HDACi were combined with ABT-737, which targets the intrinsic apoptosis pathway, recombinant human tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (rhTRAIL/MD5-1), that activates the extrinsic apoptosis pathway or the DNA methyl transferase inhibitor 5-azacytidine."( Preclinical screening of histone deacetylase inhibitors combined with ABT-737, rhTRAIL/MD5-1 or 5-azacytidine using syngeneic Vk*MYC multiple myeloma.
Atadja, P; Banks, KM; Bergsagel, PL; Chesi, M; Doyle, MA; Ellul, J; Faulkner, D; Johnstone, RW; Lefebure, M; Matthews, GM; Shortt, J; Vidacs, E, 2013
)
0.39
"Here we investigated the effect of hydrodynamic IL-35-expressing plasmid injection in combination with a methyltransferase inhibitor (decitabine) on immune function and transplantation tolerance in mice."( Inhibiting cardiac allograft rejection with interleukin-35 therapy combined with decitabine treatment in mice.
Guo, H; He, X; Jiang, X; Wang, W; Zhao, N; Zhu, L, 2013
)
0.39
" Thus, IL-35 gene therapy combined with decitabine provides a novel approach to induce transplantation tolerance."( Inhibiting cardiac allograft rejection with interleukin-35 therapy combined with decitabine treatment in mice.
Guo, H; He, X; Jiang, X; Wang, W; Zhao, N; Zhu, L, 2013
)
0.39
"Decitabine (5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine; DAC) in combination with tetrahydrouridine (THU) is a potential oral therapy for sickle cell disease and β-thalassemia."( Subchronic oral toxicity study of decitabine in combination with tetrahydrouridine in CD-1 mice.
Chan, K; Covey, JM; Engelke, K; Ling, Y; Saunthararajah, Y; Sharpnack, D; Terse, P,
)
0.13
" The differences of clinical outcome and adverse events among the patients treated with decitabine combined with DAG regimen, CAG regimen or "3+7" regimen were analyzed."( [Comparative analysis of decitabine combined with DAG regimen and other regimens in treatment of refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia].
Chen, Y; Duan, Y; Gu, X; Hao, J; Li, L; Liu, J; Liu, Z; Shen, Z; Wang, L; Wang, Y; Zhao, W, 2014
)
0.4
"Decitabine combined with DAG regimen is effective and well tolerated in refractory/relapsed AML patients who were unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and the patients with low marrow blast counts are more suitable for the application of decitabine combined with DAG regimen."( [Comparative analysis of decitabine combined with DAG regimen and other regimens in treatment of refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia].
Chen, Y; Duan, Y; Gu, X; Hao, J; Li, L; Liu, J; Liu, Z; Shen, Z; Wang, L; Wang, Y; Zhao, W, 2014
)
0.4
" The present article describes our experience with ultra-low-dose decitabine combined with infusion of autologous cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells for 2 elderly patients with myelodysplastic syndrome-transformed AML."( Ultra-low-dose decitabine combined with autologous cytokine-induced killer cells for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia transformed from myelodysplastic syndrome.
Cai, L; Chi, X; Li, S; Lu, X; Tuo, S; Wang, H; Wang, X; Wu, X; Yang, B; Yang, Y; Yu, R; Zhang, F; Zhu, H, 2014
)
0.4
"2 mg/kg three times weekly for 2 weeks (starting on day 1), in combination with oral panobinostat 10, 20, or 30 mg every 96 h (starting on day 8), and oral temozolomide 150 mg/m(2)/day on days 9 through 13."( Treatment of resistant metastatic melanoma using sequential epigenetic therapy (decitabine and panobinostat) combined with chemotherapy (temozolomide).
Deutsch, J; Frees, M; Laux, D; Leon-Ferre, R; Milhem, M; Smith, BJ; Xia, C, 2014
)
0.4
"This triple agent of dual epigenetic therapy in combination with traditional chemotherapy was generally well tolerated by the cohort and appeared safe to be continued in a Phase II trial."( Treatment of resistant metastatic melanoma using sequential epigenetic therapy (decitabine and panobinostat) combined with chemotherapy (temozolomide).
Deutsch, J; Frees, M; Laux, D; Leon-Ferre, R; Milhem, M; Smith, BJ; Xia, C, 2014
)
0.4
"This study was aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of relapsed-refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with AML1-ETO⁺, and its therapeutic efficacy and side effects when decitabine combined with modified CAG regimen was used."( [Clinical efficacy of decitabine combined with modified CAG regimen for relapsed-refractory acute myeloid leukemia with AML1-ETO⁺].
Jing, Y; Liu, SY; Niu, JH; Yang, H; Yu, L; Zhang, Q; Zhu, CY; Zhu, HY, 2014
)
0.4
"This study was aimed to investigate the effects of bortezomib combined with 5-azacytidine on the apoptosis of K562 cells and expressiom of SHIP mRNA."( [Effects of bortezomib combined with 5-azacytidine on the apoptosis of K562 cells and expression of SHIP mRNA].
Jia, ZQ; Rong, HQ; Su, W; Tao, J; Wei, YL; Wei, YT; Yu, CX, 2014
)
0.4
"This study was purposed to compare the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of low-dose decitabine combined with CAG regimen (aclarubicin, Ara-C, and G-CSF) and CAG regimen alone in intermediate to high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and evaluate the validity and efficacy of the former regimen as new treatment method of intermediate to high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes."( [Comparison of clinical efficacy between decitabine combined with CAG regimen and CAG regimen alone in patients with intermediate to high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes].
Cui, GX; Wu, WZ; Zhang, YP, 2014
)
0.4
" The aim of the study presented here was to analyze the effects of a pharmacological inhibition of EZH2 alone and in combination with other anticancer drugs on RTs cells in vitro."( Analysis of the antiproliferative effects of 3-deazaneoplanocin A in combination with standard anticancer agents in rhabdoid tumor cell lines.
Borchardt, C; Clemens, D; Dirksen, U; Frühwald, MC; Kool, M; Unland, R, 2015
)
0.42
"Treating MDS/AML with decitabine alone, in combination with half or one course CAG regimen produced high efficacy."( [The clinical efficacy of the patients of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes treated with decitabine alone, combined with half or one couse of CAG regimen].
Chen, S; Fu, Z; Gao, S; Han, Y; Jin, Z; Ma, X; Qiu, H; Sun, A; Tang, X; Wu, D, 2014
)
0.4
"In this Phase 1b study, the safety and tolerability of maintenance therapy, comprising lenalidomide (0-25 mg, days 5-25) in combination with azacitidine (50-75 mg/m(2) , days 1-5) every 28 d, was explored in 40 patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in complete remission after chemotherapy."( Maintenance lenalidomide in combination with 5-azacitidine as post-remission therapy for acute myeloid leukaemia.
Avery, S; Fleming, S; Govindaraj, C; McManus, J; Patil, S; Perruzza, S; Plebanski, M; Spencer, A; Stevenson, W; Tan, P; Wei, A, 2015
)
0.42
"This study was to investigate the therapeutic effectiveness and side effect of decitabine combined with modified CAG regimen for relapse or refractory patients with acute myeloid leukemia."( [Clinical resarch of decitabine combined with modified CAG regimen for treatment of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia].
Jing, Y; Liu, SY; Niu, JH; Yang, H; Yu, L; Zhang, Q; Zhu, CY; Zhu, HY, 2015
)
0.42
"After treatment by using decitabine combined with modified CAG regimen, 7 patients achived complete remission, 1 patient achived partial remission, 2 patient did not achieve remission, the overall remission rate was 80% (8/10), the median time of white blood cell count recovery was 18."( [Clinical resarch of decitabine combined with modified CAG regimen for treatment of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia].
Jing, Y; Liu, SY; Niu, JH; Yang, H; Yu, L; Zhang, Q; Zhu, CY; Zhu, HY, 2015
)
0.42
"The treatment of decitabine combined with modified CAG regimen for relapsed and refractory AML shows high response rate, low side effects, so it worthy to further clinical study."( [Clinical resarch of decitabine combined with modified CAG regimen for treatment of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia].
Jing, Y; Liu, SY; Niu, JH; Yang, H; Yu, L; Zhang, Q; Zhu, CY; Zhu, HY, 2015
)
0.42
"All patients in this study were treated with decitabine of 15 mg/m2 for 5 days and G-CSF for priming, in combination with cytarabine of 10-mg/m2 q12h for 7 days and aclarubicin of 10 mg/day for 4 days (D-CAG)."( Efficacy and safety of decitabine in combination with G-CSF, low-dose cytarabine and aclarubicin in newly diagnosed elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia.
Chen, Y; Ding, J; Duan, L; Gu, J; Hong, M; Li, J; Li, Y; Liu, P; Lu, H; Pan, L; Qian, S; Qiu, H; Shi, J; Wang, J; Wu, H; Xu, J; Xu, Y; Yu, K; Zhang, R; Zhang, S; Zhou, J; Zhou, S; Zhu, H; Zhu, Y, 2015
)
0.42
" In this open-label, phase I/II clinical study, we analyzed the toxicity and efficacy of low dose decitabine combined with taxol and platinum chemotherapy in treatment of refractory and recurrent ovarian cancer."( Low Dose Decitabine Combined with Taxol and Platinum Chemotherapy to Treat Refractory/Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase I/II Study.
Chen, M; Fu, X; Han, W; Meng, Y; Nie, J; Wang, X; Wang, Y; Zhang, Y, 2015
)
0.42
"Low dose decitabine combined with taxol and platinum was well-tolerated and suitable for treating refractory/refractory ovarian cancer."( Low Dose Decitabine Combined with Taxol and Platinum Chemotherapy to Treat Refractory/Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase I/II Study.
Chen, M; Fu, X; Han, W; Meng, Y; Nie, J; Wang, X; Wang, Y; Zhang, Y, 2015
)
0.42
" Patients are randomized to one of the four treatment groups: DAC alone or in combination with VPA or ATRA or with both add-on drugs."( DECIDER: prospective randomized multicenter phase II trial of low-dose decitabine (DAC) administered alone or in combination with the histone deacetylase inhibitor valproic acid (VPA) and all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) in patients >60 years with acute mye
Cieslik, C; Döhner, K; Grishina, O; Hackanson, B; Lübbert, M; Lubrich, B; May, AM; Müller, MJ; Schmoor, C, 2015
)
0.42
"To investigate the therapeutic efficacy and side effects of treating patients with myelodysplastic syndrome-RAEB (MDS-RAEB) and with refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) by using decitabine combined with CAG regimen."( [Clinical Efficacy of Decitabine Combined with CAG Regimen for Myelodysplastic Syndrome-RAEB and Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia].
Cao, YB; DA, WM; Li, SW; Li, XH; Liu, B; Liu, ZY; Wu, XX; Wu, YM; Xu, LX; Yan, B; Yang, XL, 2015
)
0.42
" All the patients received decitabine combined with CAG regimen consisting of decitabine 20 mg/(m(2) · d), d 1-5; aclarubicin 10 mg/d, d 6-13; cytarabine 20 mg/d, d 6-19; G-CSF 300 µg/d, d 6-19."( [Clinical Efficacy of Decitabine Combined with CAG Regimen for Myelodysplastic Syndrome-RAEB and Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia].
Cao, YB; DA, WM; Li, SW; Li, XH; Liu, B; Liu, ZY; Wu, XX; Wu, YM; Xu, LX; Yan, B; Yang, XL, 2015
)
0.42
"Decitabine combined with CAG regimen is effective and safe for treatment of MDS-RAEB and refractory AML patients, which can prolong lives of patiens with refractory hematological diseases."( [Clinical Efficacy of Decitabine Combined with CAG Regimen for Myelodysplastic Syndrome-RAEB and Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia].
Cao, YB; DA, WM; Li, SW; Li, XH; Liu, B; Liu, ZY; Wu, XX; Wu, YM; Xu, LX; Yan, B; Yang, XL, 2015
)
0.42
"We conducted a study exploring the clinical safety and efficacy of decitabine in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), combined with a complex karyotype."( Decitabine in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Which Combined with Complex Karyotype Respectively.
Chen, SN; Fu, JH; Gao, S; Han, Y; Hu, XH; Jin, ZM; Li, Z; Qiu, HY; Sun, AN; Tang, XW; Wu, DP; Xu, Y, 2015
)
0.42
"From April 2009 to September 2013, a total of 35 patients with AML/MDS combined with a complex karyotype diagnosed in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University were included for retrospective analysis."( Decitabine in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Which Combined with Complex Karyotype Respectively.
Chen, SN; Fu, JH; Gao, S; Han, Y; Hu, XH; Jin, ZM; Li, Z; Qiu, HY; Sun, AN; Tang, XW; Wu, DP; Xu, Y, 2015
)
0.42
"Decitabine alone or combination with AAG can improve outcome of AML/MDS with a complex karyotype, there being no significant difference decitabine in inducing remission rates in patients with different karyotype."( Decitabine in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Which Combined with Complex Karyotype Respectively.
Chen, SN; Fu, JH; Gao, S; Han, Y; Hu, XH; Jin, ZM; Li, Z; Qiu, HY; Sun, AN; Tang, XW; Wu, DP; Xu, Y, 2015
)
0.42
"In this study we retrospectively analyzed 53 refractory or relapsed CN- AML patients receiving the therapy including decitabine combined with CAG and CAG- like regimen in our center from April 2011 to October 2014."( [Outcomes of refractory or relapsed DNMT3A + cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia patients followed the therapy including decitabine combined with CAG or CAG-like regimen].
Chen, S; Qiu, H; Shen, H; Sun, A; Sun, Y; Wu, D; Xu, Y; Yang, Z, 2015
)
0.42
"Decitabine combined with CAG or CAG-like regimen was an effective and safe treatment for refractory or relapsed CN- AML patients."( [Outcomes of refractory or relapsed DNMT3A + cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia patients followed the therapy including decitabine combined with CAG or CAG-like regimen].
Chen, S; Qiu, H; Shen, H; Sun, A; Sun, Y; Wu, D; Xu, Y; Yang, Z, 2015
)
0.42
" We conclude that targeting MC2 Ag, combined with epigenetic drug-enhanced antigenicity, allows for significant and tumor-selective T cell responses."( MAGE-C2-Specific TCRs Combined with Epigenetic Drug-Enhanced Antigenicity Yield Robust and Tumor-Selective T Cell Responses.
Coulie, PG; da Silva, M; Debets, R; Kunert, A; Lamers, C; Sleijfer, S; van Brakel, M; van Steenbergen-Langeveld, S, 2016
)
0.43
" We conducted a prospective study of 23 elderly patients (median age, 68 years; range, 60 to 87 years) with newly diagnosed AML to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of decitabine plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor priming, low-dose aclarubicin, and cytarabine (DCAG) chemotherapy combined with HLA-mismatched stem cell microtransplantation (SC-MST) without graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis."( Decitabine before Low-Dose Cytarabine-Based Chemotherapy Combined with Human Leukocyte Antigen-Mismatched Stem Cell Microtransplantation Improved Outcomes in Elderly Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Chen, Y; Huang, J; Li, J; Li, Y; Lian, Y; Qian, S; Wu, Y; Xie, Y; Zhang, X; Zhao, H; Zhu, Y, 2017
)
0.46
" As an extension, 10 additional patients with myelodysplastic syndrome were enrolled to assess the safety and efficacy of pracinostat in combination with azacitidine."( Phase 1 dose escalation multicenter trial of pracinostat alone and in combination with azacitidine in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies.
Abaza, YM; Alfonso, A; Borthakur, G; Chang, JE; Chong, TH; Chuah, C; Dong, XQ; Durkes, DE; Estrov, Z; Ferrajoli, A; Foudray, MC; Garcia-Manero, G; Goh, BC; Jabbour, EJ; Kadia, TM; Kantarjian, HM; Koh, LP; Konopleva, MY; Wierda, WG, 2017
)
0.46
"To investigate the clinical efficacy of decitabine combined with low-dose IA for treating patients with myelodysplastic syndrome-EB."( [Clinical Observation of Therapeutic Regimen Consisted of Decitabine Combined with Low-Dose IA Regimen for Myelodysplastic Syndrome-EB].
Hao, JX; Li, J; Wu, D; Zhang, M, 2017
)
0.46
"To investigate the clinical efficacy of low-dose decitabine combined with CAG regimen in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome-refractory anemia with excess blasts (MDS-RAEB) through retrospective analysis."( [Clinical Efficacy of Low-dose Decitabine Combined with CAG Regimen in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome-refractory Anemia with Excess Blasts(MDS-RAEB)].
Guo, R; Han, HH; Jiang, ZX; Liu, YF; Sun, H; Wang, M, 2017
)
0.46
"Thirty-six patients with MDS-RAEB who ever received low-dose decitabine combined with CAG regimen were enrolled into decitabine + CAG group and 40 patients with MDS-RAEB treated by decitabine alone in our center were enolled into the control group."( [Clinical Efficacy of Low-dose Decitabine Combined with CAG Regimen in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome-refractory Anemia with Excess Blasts(MDS-RAEB)].
Guo, R; Han, HH; Jiang, ZX; Liu, YF; Sun, H; Wang, M, 2017
)
0.46
"Low-dose decitabine combined with CAG regimen has better clinical efficacy for patients with MDS-RAEB than that of decitabine alone."( [Clinical Efficacy of Low-dose Decitabine Combined with CAG Regimen in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome-refractory Anemia with Excess Blasts(MDS-RAEB)].
Guo, R; Han, HH; Jiang, ZX; Liu, YF; Sun, H; Wang, M, 2017
)
0.46
"To investigate the curative effect and safety of decitabine combined with IAG regimen for treating senile MDS-transformed AML patients."( [Curative Effect of Decitabine Combined with IAG Regimen for Senile Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Transformed Acute Myeloid Leukemia].
Guo, XZ; Huang, YQ; Pan, JX; Wu, SX; Zhang, XY, 2017
)
0.46
"Decitabine combined with IAG regimen is an effective for treating senile MDS-transformed AML patients."( [Curative Effect of Decitabine Combined with IAG Regimen for Senile Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Transformed Acute Myeloid Leukemia].
Guo, XZ; Huang, YQ; Pan, JX; Wu, SX; Zhang, XY, 2017
)
0.46
"To investigate the therapeutic effectiveness and side effects of decitabine combined with or without cytarabine-based low dose regimen for acute myeloid leukemia in geratic patients."( [Clinical Efficacy of Decitabine Combined with or without Cytarabine-based Low Dose Regimen for Senile patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia].
DU, Y; Jing, Y; Li, PF; Liu, M; Peng, CJ; Sun, JZ; Wang, ZH; Yao, YB; Zhou, HW; Zhou, MH, 2018
)
0.48
"Decitabine combined with or without cytarabine-based low dose regimen is promising for the treatment of geriatric acute myeloid leukemia, thus improving the overall response rate, and prolonging overall survival time."( [Clinical Efficacy of Decitabine Combined with or without Cytarabine-based Low Dose Regimen for Senile patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia].
DU, Y; Jing, Y; Li, PF; Liu, M; Peng, CJ; Sun, JZ; Wang, ZH; Yao, YB; Zhou, HW; Zhou, MH, 2018
)
0.48
"To develop new rehabilitation therapies for chronic stroke, this study examined the effectiveness of task-specific training (TST) and TST combined with DNA methyltransferase inhibitor in chronic stroke recovery."( Effect of Inhibition of DNA Methylation Combined with Task-Specific Training on Chronic Stroke Recovery.
Choi, DH; Choi, IA; Kim, HY; Lee, CS; Lee, J, 2018
)
0.48
" To evaluate antitumor activity in vivo, 5-aza was administered alone and in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) in a PDX glioma model harboring IDH1 R132H mutation."( Demethylation and epigenetic modification with 5-azacytidine reduces IDH1 mutant glioma growth in combination with temozolomide.
Borodovsky, A; Chan, T; da Costa Rosa, M; Festuccia, WT; Riggins, GJ; Yamashita, AS, 2019
)
0.51
"5-Aza provided a survival benefit as a single agent but worked best in combination with TMZ in 2 different IDH1 R132H mutant glioma models."( Demethylation and epigenetic modification with 5-azacytidine reduces IDH1 mutant glioma growth in combination with temozolomide.
Borodovsky, A; Chan, T; da Costa Rosa, M; Festuccia, WT; Riggins, GJ; Yamashita, AS, 2019
)
0.51
"In preclinical studies, oral azacitidine (CC-486), a hypomethylating agent, has been shown to have a direct anti-MM effect and in vitro anti-MM synergism when combined with lenalidomide (LEN)."( Oral azacitidine (CC-486) in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in advanced, lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma (ROAR study).
Bergin, K; Bowen, KM; Couto, S; Guzman, R; Kalff, A; Khong, T; Mithraprabhu, S; Ren, Y; Reynolds, J; Spencer, A; Thakurta, A; Wang, M, 2019
)
0.51
"Ibrutinib alone or in combination with cytarabine or azacitidine demonstrated an acceptable safety profile."( Clinical Experience With Ibrutinib Alone or in Combination With Either Cytarabine or Azacitidine in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Cortes, JE; Graef, T; Jonas, BA; Luan, Y; Stein, AS, 2019
)
0.51
"The objective of this research was to characterize the venetoclax exposure-efficacy and exposure-safety relationships and determine its optimal dose in elderly patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) receiving venetoclax in combination with low intensity therapies (hypomethylating agent [HMA; azacitidine or decitabine] or low-dose cytarabine [LDAC])."( Optimizing venetoclax dose in combination with low intensive therapies in elderly patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: An exposure-response analysis.
Agarwal, S; Friedel, A; Gopalakrishnan, S; Hayslip, J; Kirschbrown, W; Menon, R; Mensing, S; Potluri, J; Salem, AH, 2019
)
0.51
"To investigate the efficacy and safety of decitabine combined with half-course pre-excitation for the treatment of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML)."( [Efficacy and Safety of Decitabine Combined with Half-Course Pre-excitation for the Treatment of Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia].
Kong, R; Liu, Q; Qiu, HC; Wang, Y; Wu, DH; Wu, PF; Zhang, XL, 2019
)
0.51
"We recommend the "venetoclax + HMAs combined with dose-adjusted CAH/HAG" regimen as an effective treatment for adult R/RAML."( Venetoclax + hypomethylating agents combined with dose-adjusted HAG for relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia: Two case reports.
Bai, J; Lian, X; Pei, Z; Song, Q; Wang, H; Wang, J; Zhang, B, 2020
)
0.56
"To evaluate the efficacy of decitabine combined with low-dose CEG regimen (DCEG) and decitabine combined with low-dose CAG regimen (DCAG) in the treatment of elderly patients with MDS and MDS-transformed acute myeloid leukemia (AML)."( [Comparison of the Curative Efficacy of Elderly Patients with High-Risk MDS and MDS-Transformed AML between Decitabine Combined with Low-Dose CEG Regimen and Decitabine Combined with Low-Dose CAG Regimen].
He, HS; Hua, JS; Li, F; Ma, IX; Wang, XH; Wang, XQ; Wu, M; Xie, YH; Yang, RY; Ye, XJ, 2020
)
0.56
" The treament results of decitabine combined with CEG and decitabine combined with CAG were compared."( [Comparison of the Curative Efficacy of Elderly Patients with High-Risk MDS and MDS-Transformed AML between Decitabine Combined with Low-Dose CEG Regimen and Decitabine Combined with Low-Dose CAG Regimen].
He, HS; Hua, JS; Li, F; Ma, IX; Wang, XH; Wang, XQ; Wu, M; Xie, YH; Yang, RY; Ye, XJ, 2020
)
0.56
"Decitabine combined with CEG regimen could improve the survival of patients with high-risk MDS and MDS-transformed AML."( [Comparison of the Curative Efficacy of Elderly Patients with High-Risk MDS and MDS-Transformed AML between Decitabine Combined with Low-Dose CEG Regimen and Decitabine Combined with Low-Dose CAG Regimen].
He, HS; Hua, JS; Li, F; Ma, IX; Wang, XH; Wang, XQ; Wu, M; Xie, YH; Yang, RY; Ye, XJ, 2020
)
0.56
" Importantly, the drug combination reduced significantly the growth rate of subcutaneous tumors, but in an orthotopic mouse model, the combination did not improve survival and 5-Aza alone provided the best survival benefit."( Evaluation of a DNA demethylating agent in combination with all-trans retinoic acid for IDH1-mutant gliomas.
da Costa Rosa, M; Riggins, GJ; Yamashita, AS, 2022
)
0.72
"Use of DNA demethylating agent in combination with retinoids shows promise, but further optimization and preclinical studies are required for treatment of intracranial IDH-mutant gliomas."( Evaluation of a DNA demethylating agent in combination with all-trans retinoic acid for IDH1-mutant gliomas.
da Costa Rosa, M; Riggins, GJ; Yamashita, AS, 2022
)
0.72
"Venetoclax (Ven) in combination with azacitidine or decitabine (hypomethylating agent; HMA) is the standard-of-care treatment for older (≥75 years) or intensive chemotherapy ineligible adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML)."( Tumor lysis syndrome and infectious complications during treatment with venetoclax combined with azacitidine or decitabine in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.
Arora, S; Bachiashvili, K; Bathini, S; Bhatia, R; Di Stasi, A; Diamond, B; Godby, K; Gupta, U; Jamy, O; Oliver, JD; Rangaraju, S; Salzman, D; Vachhani, P; Worth, S; Zainaldin, C, 2022
)
0.72
"The purpose of this study was to identify the incidence, sites and main pathogens, and risk factors for infectious complications occurring in patients with adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) during the first course of venetoclax combined with decitabine or azacitidine."( A real-world study of infectious complications of venetoclax combined with decitabine or azacitidine in adult acute myeloid leukemia.
Chen, RR; Jin, J; Li, L; Mai, WY; Meng, HT; Qian, JJ; Sun, JN; Tong, HY; Wang, LL; Xie, WZ; Ye, XJ; Yu, WJ; Zhang, Y; Zhu, HH; Zhu, LX, 2022
)
0.72
"A retrospective cohort analysis was performed of 81 patients with AML older than 14 years who received the first cycle of venetoclax combined with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) between March 2018 and March 2021 at our institution."( A real-world study of infectious complications of venetoclax combined with decitabine or azacitidine in adult acute myeloid leukemia.
Chen, RR; Jin, J; Li, L; Mai, WY; Meng, HT; Qian, JJ; Sun, JN; Tong, HY; Wang, LL; Xie, WZ; Ye, XJ; Yu, WJ; Zhang, Y; Zhu, HH; Zhu, LX, 2022
)
0.72
"Compared with conventional chemotherapy, the incidence of infectious complications of venetoclax combined with decitabine or azacitidine significantly decreased."( A real-world study of infectious complications of venetoclax combined with decitabine or azacitidine in adult acute myeloid leukemia.
Chen, RR; Jin, J; Li, L; Mai, WY; Meng, HT; Qian, JJ; Sun, JN; Tong, HY; Wang, LL; Xie, WZ; Ye, XJ; Yu, WJ; Zhang, Y; Zhu, HH; Zhu, LX, 2022
)
0.72
"Using individual patient-level data from the phase 3 VIALE-A trial, this study assessed the cost-effectiveness of venetoclax in combination with azacitidine compared with azacitidine monotherapy for patients newly diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy, from a United States (US) third-party payer perspective."( Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Venetoclax in Combination with Azacitidine Versus Azacitidine Monotherapy in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who are Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: From a US Third Party Payer Perspective.
Chai, X; Downs, L; Iantuono, E; Ma, E; Montez, M; Nie, X; Pratz, KW; Xie, J; Yin, L, 2022
)
0.72
" Low-dose chemotherapy in combination with decitabine or azacitidine showed a similar response rate and prognosis."( Hypomethylating agents combined with low-dose chemotherapy for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukaemia unfit for intensive chemotherapy: a real-world clinical experience.
Cao, J; Chen, Y; Hu, J; Luo, L; Yang, T; Yang, X; Ye, Y; Zheng, J; Zheng, X; Zheng, Z, 2023
)
0.91
" The purpose of this study was to evaluate, from a Canadian perspective, the economic impact of venetoclax in combination with azacitidine (Ven+Aza) for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed AML who are 75 years or older or who have comorbidities that preclude using IC."( Venetoclax in Combination with Azacitidine for the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Canadian Cost-Utility Analysis.
Au, Y; Bui, CN; Chai, X; Guinan, K; Lachaine, J; Mathurin, K; Schuh, AC, 2022
)
0.72
" Venetoclax is a selective BCL-2 inhibitor, which combined with hypomethylating agents (HMAs), increased responses and prolonged survival in unfit and previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia."( 15-days duration of venetoclax combined with azacitidine in the treatment of relapsed/refractory high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: A retrospective single-center study.
Jiang, L; Jin, J; Lang, W; Lu, C; Luo, Y; Ma, L; Mei, C; Ren, Y; Tong, H; Xu, G; Xu, W; Yang, H; Ye, L; Zhou, X; Zhu, H, 2023
)
0.91
" In phase I dose escalation, cusatuzumab was then administered on days 3 and 17, in combination with azacitidine (75 mg/m2) on days 1-7, every 28 days."( Results from a phase I/II trial of cusatuzumab combined with azacitidine in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.
Adès, L; Bacher, U; Bargetzi, M; Fung, S; Gaidano, G; Gandini, D; Hultberg, A; Johnson, A; Ma, X; Müller, R; Nottage, K; Ochsenbein, AF; Pabst, T; Papayannidis, C; Recher, C; Riether, C; Shah, P; Tryon, J; Vey, N; Xiu, L, 2023
)
0.91
"Azacitidine (AZA) is a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor and epigenetic modulator that can be an effective agent in combination with chemotherapy for patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML)."( Cellular Composition and 5hmC Signature Predict the Treatment Response of AML Patients to Azacitidine Combined with Chemotherapy.
Cahill, K; Chen, C; Fulton, N; Han, D; He, C; Liang, G; Odenike, O; Stock, W; Wang, L; You, Q; Zhang, W, 2023
)
0.91
" We propose venetoclax combined with azacytidine as a useful treatment approach in elderly patients, although clinicians should be mindful that therapeutic modifications may be essential to minimize and/or avoid adverse events."( Venetoclax Combined with Azacytidine Can Be a First-line Treatment Option for Elderly Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasm.
Fujita, J; Hirose, Y; Kamimura, R; Kiyohara, E; Nagate, Y; Nakaya, A; Nojima, S; Shibayama, H, 2023
)
0.91

Bioavailability

This study aims to prepare gold nanoparticles as a new nano-formula of 5-azacitidine that can improve its bioavailability and decrease its side effects. The bioavailability of azac itidine following subcutaneous administration was 91.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"The primary objectives of this study were to characterize the absolute bioavailability of azacitidine after subcutaneous (SC) administration and to compare the single-dose pharmacokinetics of azacitidine following SC and intravenous (IV) administration."( Bioavailability of azacitidine subcutaneous versus intravenous in patients with the myelodysplastic syndromes.
Beach, CL; Eller, M; Lintz, L; Marcucci, G; Silverman, L, 2005
)
0.33
" A highly potent and orally bioavailable compound (compound 9) was identified and selected for development."( Tricyclic HIV integrase inhibitors: potent and orally bioavailable C5-aza analogs.
Cai, R; Chen, X; Jabri, S; Jin, H; Kim, CU; Lansdown, R; Metobo, S; Mish, M; Pastor, R; Pyun, P; Tsiang, M; Wright, M, 2008
)
0.35
" Despite recent advances in the clinical development of azacytidine, the use of the drug is limited by its low bioavailability and dependency on variably expressed nucleoside transporters for cellular uptake."( Delivery of 5-azacytidine to human cancer cells by elaidic acid esterification increases therapeutic drug efficacy.
Brueckner, B; Fichtner, I; Hals, PA; Lyko, F; Markelova, MR; Rius, M; Sandvold, ML, 2010
)
0.36
" The bioavailability of azacitidine following subcutaneous administration was 91."( Phase I and II study of azacitidine in Japanese patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.
Akiyama, H; Ando, K; Hata, T; Hotta, T; Ishikawa, T; Kobayashi, Y; Nakao, S; Ogawa, Y; Ogura, M; Ohashi, H; Ohnishi, K; Ohyashiki, K; Okamoto, S; Ozawa, K; Taniwaki, M; Tobinai, K; Tomita, A; Uchida, T; Usui, N, 2011
)
0.37
" However, it exhibits a low oral bioavailability (only 9% in mice), because of low permeability across the intestine membrane and rapid metabolism to inactive metabolite."( A carrier-mediated prodrug approach to improve the oral absorption of antileukemic drug decitabine.
Fan, R; Gao, Y; He, Z; Jin, L; Lian, H; Liu, J; Sun, J; Sun, Y; Xu, Y; Zhang, T; Zhang, Y, 2013
)
0.39
"As an initial step towards the clinical translation of these drugs for the treatment of HIV-1 infection, we synthesized decitabine and gemcitabine prodrugs in order to increase drug permeability, which has generally been shown to correlate with increased bioavailability in vivo."( Characterization of permeability, stability and anti-HIV-1 activity of decitabine and gemcitabine divalerate prodrugs.
Bonnac, L; Clouser, CL; Mansky, LM; Patterson, SE, 2014
)
0.4
" The subcutaneous dosing route for consecutive days and reduced bioavailability of 5-azacytidine because of inactivation by cytidine deaminase may limit the expansion of epigenetic therapy into Phase III trials."( Aerosolised 5-azacytidine suppresses tumour growth and reprogrammes the epigenome in an orthotopic lung cancer model.
Belinsky, SA; Cheng, YS; Grimes, MJ; Kuehl, PJ; March, TH; Picchi, MA; Reed, MD; Tellez, CS; Tessema, M, 2013
)
0.39
" Tetrahydrouridine, a competitive inhibitor of cytidine deaminase, was used in the combination to improve oral bioavailability of DAC."( Subchronic oral toxicity study of decitabine in combination with tetrahydrouridine in CD-1 mice.
Chan, K; Covey, JM; Engelke, K; Ling, Y; Saunthararajah, Y; Sharpnack, D; Terse, P,
)
0.13
" Appropriate delivery systems able to enrich Decitabine at the site of action and improve its bioavailability would reduce the incidence of toxicity on healthy tissues."( Novel epigenetic target therapy for prostate cancer: a preclinical study.
Cinti, C; Gherardini, L; Grimaldi, S; Naldi, I; Pani, L; Pelosi, G; Taranta, M; Viglione, F, 2014
)
0.4
" The review will provide a complete insight to the readers about the mechanisms of action, efficacy to demethylate and re-express various cancer-related genes, anti-tumor activity, cytotoxicity profile, stability, and bioavailability of these drugs."( Nucleosidic DNA demethylating epigenetic drugs - A comprehensive review from discovery to clinic.
Agrawal, K; Das, V; Hajdúch, M; Vyas, P, 2018
)
0.48
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51
"To determine if an oral dosing strategy might be feasible in the clinic with AZA, we attempted to increase the bioavailability of oral AZA through the use of CDZ, in a murine model."( Oral Azacitidine and Cedazuridine Approximate Parenteral Azacitidine Efficacy in Murine Model.
Arrate, M; Azab, M; Boyd, K; Fuller, L; Gorska, AE; Keer, H; Oganesian, A; Ramsey, HE; Savona, MR, 2020
)
0.56
" We report here the discovery of a novel class of orally bioavailable DNMT1-selective inhibitors as exemplified by GSK3482364."(
Atkins, C; Benowitz, AB; Butlin, R; Cockerill, M; Ennulat, D; Gilmartin, AG; Gore, ER; Groy, A; Halsey, W; Jordan, A; Kruger, RG; Long, ER; Luengo, J; McCabe, MT; McNulty, DE; Montoute, MN; Ogilvie, D; Pappalardi, M; Raoof, A; Rueda, L; Stowell, A; Waddell, I; Wu, Z, 2021
)
0.62
" The development of oral HMAs has been an area of active interest; however, oral bioavailability has been quite poor due to rapid metabolism by cytidine deaminase (CDA)."( Cedazuridine/decitabine: from preclinical to clinical development in myeloid malignancies.
Cahill, K; Odenike, O; Patel, AA; Saygin, C, 2021
)
0.62
" Focusing on AML and MDS, this report reviews the rationale for the use of orally bioavailable AZA and its potential use in all-oral combination therapy regimens; the unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of Oral-AZA compared with injectable AZA; the clinical safety and efficacy of Oral-AZA maintenance therapy in patients with AML in first remission and for treatment of patients with active MDS; and ongoing Oral-AZA clinical trials."( Oral Azacitidine (CC-486) for the Treatment of Myeloid Malignancies.
Beach, CL; Döhner, H; Garcia-Manero, G; La Torre, I; Santini, V; Skikne, B; Wei, AH, 2022
)
0.72
"This study aims to prepare gold nanoparticles as a new nano-formula of 5-azacitidine that can improve its bioavailability and decrease its side effects."( Multifunctional
Eldin, SSE; Hassan, AH; Rashed, HM; Sakr, TM; Salem, HF, 2023
)
0.91
" Venetoclax is an orally bioavailable small molecule BCL-2 inhibitor that is synergistic with hypomethylating agents."( Azacitidine plus venetoclax in patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes or chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia: phase 1 results of a single-centre, dose-escalation, dose-expansion, phase 1-2 study.
Alvarado, Y; Andreeff, M; Bazinet, A; Chien, K; Colla, S; Darbaniyan, F; Ganan-Gomez, I; Garcia-Manero, G; Huang, X; Jabbour, E; Kadia, T; Kanagal-Shamanna, R; Kantarjian, H; Masarova, L; McCue, D; Mirabella, B; Montalban-Bravo, G; Ohanian, M; Qiao, W; Ravandi, F; Short, N; Takahashi, K; Yilmaz, M, 2022
)
0.72
" Previously, we showed the promising oral bioavailability and antileukemia effects of a new HMA, OR2100 (OR21)."( Combination of a New Oral Demethylating Agent, OR2100, and Venetoclax for Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Fukuda-Kurahashi, Y; Hoshiko, T; Kamachi, K; Kawasoe, K; Kimura, S; Kurahashi, Y; Ureshino, H; Watanabe, T; Yamamoto, Y; Yoshida-Sakai, N, 2023
)
0.91

Dosage Studied

Azacitidine is dose proportional over the 25-100 mg/m2 dosing range. Nurses should have an understanding of dosage and administration guidelines, commonly observed adverse events, and monitoring of laboratory tests.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" Eighteen patients were treated with 5-azacytidine at a dosage of 200-250 mg/m2/day X 5 intravenously (i."( A comparative clinical trial of 5-azacytidine and guanazole in previously treated adults with acute nonlymphocytic leukemia.
Levi, JA; Wiernik, PH, 1976
)
0.26
" 5-Azacytidine was administered subcutaneously at a dosage of 100 mg/m2/day for 10 days."( Phase II study of subcutaneously administered 5-azacytidine (NSC-102816) in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma.
Bellet, RE; Berd, D; Catalano, RB; Mastrangelo, MJ, 1978
)
0.26
" Rather stable intravenous dosage forms can be formulated."( 5-Azacytidine hydrolysis kinetics measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography and 13C-NMR spectroscopy.
Chan, KK; Giannini, DD; Sadee, W; Staroscik, JA, 1979
)
0.26
" The potential utility of the bisulfite-I addition product as a I prodrug in parenteral and possible oral dosage forms is discussed."( Stabilization of 5-azacytidine by nucleophilic addition of bisulfite ion.
Chatterji, DC; Gallelli, JF, 1979
)
0.26
" Mutational dose-response studies with X-rays, ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS), and ICR-191 were conducted in 4 of these revertant cell lines."( Heritable alterations at the adenine phosphoribosyltransferase (APRT) locus in human lymphoblastoid cell lines.
Amundson, SA; Fortunato, JE; Liber, HL, 1992
)
0.28
" Both methods can be used to assess the sensitivity of blasts to chemotherapeutic drugs, but different dose-response curves are obtained with each."( A comparison of the lethal effects in culture of cytosine arabinoside and arabinofuranosyl-5-azacytosine acting on the blast cells fo acute myeloblastic leukemia.
McCulloch, EA; Yang, GS, 1992
)
0.28
" There is a clear-cut inverse dose-response relationship in leukemia induction, as the higher dose principally shows a lower degree of effectiveness."( Diaplacental carcinogenic effects of 5-azacytidine in NMRI-mice.
Geber, E; Lehmacher, W; Schmahl, W, 1985
)
0.27
" A single dose of AZA-C (65 mg/kg, ip) produced increases in hepatic MT concentrations 8 hr after dosing that were still elevated at 48 hr."( Induction of hepatic metallothionein following 5-azacytidine administration.
Poirier, LA; Waalkes, MP, 1985
)
0.27
" This enhancement is particularly striking at decreased effector:target ratios (as low as one effector per five targets) and is also demonstrated by a shift to lower concentrations of the phorbol diester dose-response curve."( Enhancement of phorbol diester-induced HL-60-mediated cytotoxicity by retinoic acid, dimethyl sulfoxide, and 5-azacytidine.
Hall, RE; Leftwich, JA, 1986
)
0.27
" The induction frequency per viable cell appears to be dose dependent for these four types of radiation, and the dose-response curves are approximately linear."( Induction of proline prototrophs in CHO-K1 cells by heavy ions.
Craise, LM; Mei, MT; Yang, TC, 1986
)
0.27
" Dose-response studies (250-3000 rad, 72 hr) indicated that similar dose-response relationships for the appearance of MT in the liver and kidney were observed."( Increased metallothionein content in rat liver and kidney following X-irradiation.
Aono, K; Hashimoto, K; Hayashi, H; Kondoh, S; Shiraishi, N; Takeda, Y; Yamamoto, H, 1986
)
0.27
"Sensitivities to drugs acting on cells in culture can be measured as dose-response curves, provided a quantitative assay is available for a relevant cell function."( Response to 5-azacytidine of leukemic blast cells in suspension: a biological parameter associated with response to chemotherapy.
Curtis, JE; McCulloch, EA; Senn, JS; Tritchler, DL; Wang, C, 1987
)
0.27
"In mammals, X-chromosome dosage compensation is achieved by inactivating one X chromosome in female cells."( Effect of ageing on reactivation of the human X-linked HPRT locus.
Axelman, J; Beggs, AH; Migeon, BR, 1988
)
0.27
" For aza-dC a dose-response relationship was demonstrated for doses up to 50 mg kg-1 (3 times q 12 h); a higher dose resulted in only a slight increase in median survival time (MST)."( Comparison of the antileukaemic activity of 5 aza-2-deoxycytidine and arabinofuranosyl-cytosine in rats with myelocytic leukaemia.
Colly, LP; Lurvink, E; Richel, DJ; Willemze, R, 1988
)
0.27
" We were unable to demonstrate a consistent dosage effect of methionine on fragile X expression."( The effect of methionine and 5-azacytidine on fragile X expression.
Abruzzo, MA; Jacobs, PA; Mayer, M, 1985
)
0.27
" Infectious virus and nucleocapsid production were decreased or stopped, depending on the anesthetic dosage used."( Anesthetic action and virus replication: inhibition of measles virus replication in cells exposed to halothane.
Bedows, E; Knight, PR; Nahrwold, ML, 1980
)
0.26
"Eight patients with osteogenic sarcoma and seven patients with Ewing's sarcoma, all with advanced metastatic disease refractory to conventional therapy, were treated with 5-azacytidine (NSC-102816) intravenously at a dosage of 150 mg/m2 in three divided doses daily X 5 days."( Phase II study of 5-azacytidine in sarcomas of bone.
Glaubiger, DL; LeVine, AS; Poplack, DG; Reaman, GH; Srinivasan, U, 1982
)
0.26
" In dose-response studies 5-azacytidine given daily at 3-4 mg/kg produced maximal Hb F increases."( 5-Azacytidine stimulates fetal hemoglobin synthesis in anemic baboons.
DeSimone, J; Hall, L; Heller, P; Zwiers, D, 1982
)
0.26
" push in a dosage of 150 mg/m2 for 5 days."( 4'-(9-acridinylamino)methane-sulfon-m-anisidide (m-AMSA) and 5-azacytidine (AZA) in the treatment of relapsed adult acute leukemia.
Brodsky, I; Bulova, S; Conroy, JF; Kahn, SB; Lebedda, J; Sklaroff, R, 1983
)
0.27
" The frequency of TGr mutations increased linearly with the number of EMS treatments whereas the yield of BrdUrdr mutations showed a curvilinear dose-response curve."( Mutations resistant to bromodeoxyuridine in mouse lymphoma cells selected by repeated exposure to EMS. Characteristics of phenotypic instability and reversion to HAT resistance by 5-azacytidine.
Nakamura, N; Okada, S, 1983
)
0.27
" Dose-response curves indicated that the induction of cytokeratin was the result of an interaction of the drug with few targets."( 5-Azacytidine is able to induce the conversion of teratocarcinoma-derived mesenchymal cells into epithelia cells.
Darmon, M; Lamblin, D; Nicolas, JF, 1984
)
0.27
" The plasma concentration time data for the first 12 h after dosing was computer fitted to a two compartment open model."( Pharmacokinetics of 5,6-dihydro-5-azacytidine (NSC-264880) in the foxhound.
Cheng, H; Malspeis, L; Staubus, AE, 1983
)
0.27
" The establishment of general teratological data revealed clear-cut dose-response relationships after administration of this agent on either day 12 or day 14 of gestation."( Embryotoxicity of 5-azacytidine in mice. Phase- and dose-specificity studies.
Kriegel, H; Schmahl, W; Török, P, 1984
)
0.27
" PDGF dose-response curves obtained with the variant cells were shifted approximately an order of magnitude toward higher PDGF concentrations relative to PDGF dose-response curves obtained with the parental 100A cells."( Growth control variant cell line having increased serum requirement and decreased response to platelet-derived growth factor: reversion by 5-azacytidine.
Coppock, DL; Straus, DS, 1984
)
0.27
" On replating in graded NaCl, a family of dose-response curves is obtained, rising in level of resistance according to the degree of hypertonicity used to isolate the variants initially."( Osmotic stress variants in Chinese hamster cells.
Harris, M, 1993
)
0.29
" The initial dosage was 30 mg/M2/day, 80% of the maximum tolerated dosage in adults, with subsequent 30% dosage escalations."( A phase I trial of fazarabine in refractory pediatric solid tumors. A Pediatric Oncology Group study.
Bernstein, ML; Devine, S; Dubowy, R; Grier, H; Kung, F; Land, V; Murphy, S; Whitehead, VM, 1993
)
0.29
" Postimplantation dosing produced an increase in resorptions and a decrease in fetal survival and fetal weight, with no gross external malformations evident."( Effect of 5-azacytidine administration during very early pregnancy.
Cummings, AM, 1994
)
0.29
" Twenty-three patients with histologically proven recurrent cervical cancer with measurable disease received FZB at a dosage of 30 mg/m2 per day for 5 days; cycles repeated every 28 days."( A phase II study of fazarabine (NSC 281272) in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. A Gynecologic Oncology Group study.
Blessing, JA; Manetta, A; Mann, WJ; Smith, DM, 1995
)
0.29
" Both dosages of 5-azacytidine resulted in significant increases in preimplantation loss, and the high dosage of 5-azacytidine caused a decrease in fertility."( Developmental exposure of male germ cells to 5-azacytidine results in abnormal preimplantation development in rats.
Doerksen, T; Trasler, JM, 1996
)
0.29
" album female somatic cells, which indicate their distinct transcriptional activities as a possible consequence of the negative dosage compensation of X-linked genes."( DNA methylation patterns of Melandrium album chromosomes.
Castiglione, MR; Siroky, J; Vyskot, B, 1998
)
0.3
" The present study was designed to determine the effect of repeated decitabine dosing on HbF levels and hematologic toxicity over a 9-month treatment period."( Maintenance of elevated fetal hemoglobin levels by decitabine during dose interval treatment of sickle cell anemia.
Bressler, L; DeSimone, J; Dorn, L; Koshy, M; Lavelle, D; Molokie, R; Talischy, N, 2002
)
0.31
" Responders were treated at all three decitabine dose levels, and no dose-response correlation was observed."( Long-term follow-up of a phase I study of high-dose decitabine, busulfan, and cyclophosphamide plus allogeneic transplantation for the treatment of patients with leukemias.
Andersson, B; Champlin, R; Couriel, D; de Lima, M; Donato, M; Gajewski, J; Giralt, S; Kantarjian, H; Khouri, I; Ravandi, F; Shahjahan, M; van Besien, K, 2003
)
0.32
" There was no evidence of a dose-response effect."( Results of decitabine (5-aza-2'deoxycytidine) therapy in 130 patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia.
Andreeff, M; Cortes, J; Faderl, S; Garcia-Manero, G; Giles, FJ; Issa, JP; Kantarjian, HM; Keating, M; O'Brien, S; Rios, MB; Shan, J; Talpaz, M, 2003
)
0.32
" Chronic dosing and sustained increases in hemoglobin F and total hemoglobin levels may be possible."( Effects of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine on fetal hemoglobin levels, red cell adhesion, and hematopoietic differentiation in patients with sickle cell disease.
Bressler, L; Chen, YH; DeSimone, J; Dorn, L; Gavazova, S; Hillery, CA; Hoffman, R; Lavelle, D; Molokie, R; Saunthararajah, Y, 2003
)
0.32
" This information sparked further clinical trials using a lower dosing schedule since the original studies using higher doses were associated with significant myelosuppression and induction toxicity."( Decitabine dosing schedules.
Issa, JP; Kantarjian, HM, 2005
)
0.33
" Decitabine appears to be a promising new therapy for the treatment of MDS; however, defining the optimal dosing schedule and exploring the possible use in combination with other agents such as the histone deacetylase inhibitors need further evaluation."( Decitabine in myelodysplastic syndromes.
Saba, HI; Wijermans, PW, 2005
)
0.33
" Dose-response correlations and the duration of response to aza-deoxycytidine (ADC) and trichostatin A (TSA) were characterized."( Epigenetic-mediated upregulation of progesterone receptor B gene in endometrial cancer cell lines.
Dowdy, SC; Eberhardt, NL; Gonzalez Bosquet, J; Jiang, SW; Podratz, KC; Xiong, Y; Zhao, Y, 2005
)
0.33
"The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, dosage and administration, and safety of azacitidine are reviewed."( Azacitidine: a novel agent for myelodysplastic syndromes.
Hahn, K; Kolesar, JM; Sullivan, M, 2005
)
0.33
" The recommended dosage of azacitidine for the first treatment cycle is 75 mg/m(2) daily for seven days."( Azacitidine: a novel agent for myelodysplastic syndromes.
Hahn, K; Kolesar, JM; Sullivan, M, 2005
)
0.33
" To ensure proper treatment with azacitidine, nurses should have an understanding of dosage and administration guidelines, commonly observed adverse events, monitoring and care of adverse events, and monitoring of laboratory tests."( Advances in myelodysplastic syndrome: nursing implications of azacitidine.
Demakos, EP; Linebaugh, JA, 2005
)
0.33
" One example of epigenetic gene regulation is dosage compensation of the X chromosome in mammalian females."( X-inactivation status varies in human embryonic stem cell lines.
Baetge, EE; Batten, JL; Carpenter, MK; Hall, L; Hoffman, LM; Lawrence, J; Pardasani, D; Young, H,
)
0.13
"Since appropriate dosing schedules of decitabine are being investigated, comparison of the clinical effectiveness of 5-AzaC and decitabine would be premature at this time."( 5-azacytidine and decitabine monotherapies of myelodysplastic disorders.
Kuykendall, JR, 2005
)
0.33
" The present subcutaneous dosing schedule, 75 mg/m(2) for 7/28 days, is based on early clinical studies and may constitute a practical problem for patients."( A pharmacodynamic study of 5-azacytidine in the P39 cell line.
Aggerholm, A; Hassan, M; Hellström-Lindberg, E; Hokland, P; Khan, R, 2006
)
0.33
" The model provides information about the relation between azacytidine dose intensity and exposure time on malignant myeloid cells, which could serve as a rationale for further clinical development of practical, safe, and cost-effective dosing schedules."( A pharmacodynamic study of 5-azacytidine in the P39 cell line.
Aggerholm, A; Hassan, M; Hellström-Lindberg, E; Hokland, P; Khan, R, 2006
)
0.33
" Major responses associated with cytogenetic complete response developed in patients receiving prolonged dosing schedules of aza-CR."( Combined DNA methyltransferase and histone deacetylase inhibition in the treatment of myeloid neoplasms.
Baylin, S; Carducci, M; Carraway, H; Dauses, T; Dover, G; Galm, O; Gore, SD; Grever, M; Herman, JG; Jiemjit, A; Karp, JE; Manning, J; Mays, A; Miller, CB; Murgo, A; Rudek, MA; Smith, BD; Sugar, E; Weng, LJ; Zhao, M; Zwiebel, J, 2006
)
0.33
"MTT method and flow cytometry were used to detect the growth and apoptosis of Daudi cells after treated with different dosage of 5-Aza-CdIR."( [SHP-1 gene's methylation status of Daudi lymphoma cell and the demethylation effect of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine].
Fang, JC; Feng, ZY; He, D; He, XL; Li, L; Qiu, G; Su, ZL; Zhu, MF, 2006
)
0.33
"The PK of this dosing regimen was evaluated in sixteen patients with MDS or AML."( Pharmacokinetics of decitabine administered as a 3-h infusion to patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).
Cashen, AF; DiPersio, J; Fisher, N; Shah, AK; Todt, L, 2008
)
0.35
"0 ng/ml, and the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-infinity), 152-163 ng h/ml, were unchanged during dosing of decitabine for 3 days."( Pharmacokinetics of decitabine administered as a 3-h infusion to patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).
Cashen, AF; DiPersio, J; Fisher, N; Shah, AK; Todt, L, 2008
)
0.35
"Decitabine dosed at 15 mg/m2 iv every 8 h for 3 days resulted in a predictable and manageable toxicity profile in patients with MDS/AML."( Pharmacokinetics of decitabine administered as a 3-h infusion to patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).
Cashen, AF; DiPersio, J; Fisher, N; Shah, AK; Todt, L, 2008
)
0.35
" Patients with >24% methylation may benefit from alternative dosing or combination strategies."( CDKN2B methylation status and isolated chromosome 7 abnormalities predict responses to treatment with 5-azacytidine.
Chronis, C; Ho, A; John, A; Khan, S; Mufti, GJ; Pomplun, S; Raj, K; Samuel, J; Thomas, NS, 2007
)
0.34
" Ongoing studies are evaluating alternative dosing schedules for these drugs and the activity and safety of this class of agent in combination with histone deacetylase inhibitors."( Use of hypomethylating agents in myelodysplastic syndromes.
Atallah, E; Garcia-Manero, G, 2007
)
0.34
" Since these low-dose regimens are well-tolerated with minimal toxicity, they are suitable for chronic dosing to maintain promoter hypomethylation and expression of target genes."( Oral decitabine reactivates expression of the methylated gamma-globin gene in Papio anubis.
Chin, J; Desimone, J; Hankewych, M; Lavelle, D; Phiasivongsa, P; Redkar, S; Roxas, B; Saunthararajah, Y; Singh, M; Tang, C; Vaitkus, K; Will, R, 2007
)
0.34
" Our data show that, in addition to gene dosage changes arising from LOI and hypermethylation-induced gene silencing, gene activation resulting from hypomethylation is also prevalent in WTs."( Hypomethylation and aberrant expression of the glioma pathogenesis-related 1 gene in Wilms tumors.
Baker, JA; Brown, KW; Chilukamarri, L; Dallosso, AR; Greenhough, A; Hancock, AL; Huang, TH; Malik, K; Malik, S; Royer-Pokora, B; Zabkiewicz, J, 2007
)
0.34
" Recent clinical trials investigate new dosing schedules, routes of administration, and combination regimens."( Current status of epigenetic treatment in myelodysplastic syndromes.
Kuendgen, A; Lübbert, M, 2008
)
0.35
" Optimizing dosing schedules of decitabine to maximize hypomethylation (low dose, high dose intensity, and multiple cycles) have further improved results, suggesting that decitabine is an active therapy that alters the natural course of MDS."( Evolution of decitabine development: accomplishments, ongoing investigations, and future strategies.
Garcia-Manero, G; Issa, JP; Jabbour, E; Kantarjian, H, 2008
)
0.35
" Further research is needed to determine the appropriate patient selection and dosing schedules."( Review: recent clinical trials in epigenetic therapy.
Issa, JP; Oki, Y, 2006
)
0.33
" Meanwhile, adoption of a co-solvent mixture as the reaction medium could also greatly lower the enzyme dosage and the molar ratio of acyl donor to 5-azacytidine."( Efficiently enhancing regioselective acylation of 5-azacytidine catalysed by Candida antarctica lipase B with co-solvent mixtures as the reaction media.
Chen, X; Wu, H; Zong, M, 2009
)
0.35
"Azacitidine (AZA) is effective treatment for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) at a dosing schedule of 75 mg/m(2)/d subcutaneously for 7 days every 4 weeks."( Hematologic response to three alternative dosing schedules of azacitidine in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.
Backstrom, JT; Beach, CL; Cohn, AL; Cosgriff, TM; Fernando, IJ; Gersh, RH; Hainsworth, JD; Lyons, RM; McIntyre, HJ; Modi, SS, 2009
)
0.35
"All three alternative dosing regimens produced HI, RBC transfusion independence, and safety responses consistent with the currently approved AZA regimen."( Hematologic response to three alternative dosing schedules of azacitidine in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.
Backstrom, JT; Beach, CL; Cohn, AL; Cosgriff, TM; Fernando, IJ; Gersh, RH; Hainsworth, JD; Lyons, RM; McIntyre, HJ; Modi, SS, 2009
)
0.35
" This study assessed the efficacy and safety of an alternative dosing regimen administered on an outpatient basis in academic and community-based practices."( Multicenter study of decitabine administered daily for 5 days every 4 weeks to adults with myelodysplastic syndromes: the alternative dosing for outpatient treatment (ADOPT) trial.
Albitar, M; Arora, S; Baer, MR; Buckstein, R; Cullen, MT; Garcia-Manero, G; Godley, LA; Kantarjian, H; Larsen, JS; Slack, JL; Steensma, DP, 2009
)
0.35
"Three dosing regimens were studied in 27 patients with advanced solid tumors, and toxicity was recorded."( A phase I dose-finding study of 5-azacytidine in combination with sodium phenylbutyrate in patients with refractory solid tumors.
Ambinder, RF; Baker, SD; Carducci, MA; Donehower, RC; Gilbert, J; Gore, S; Herman, JG; Jiemjit, A; Lin, J; Rudek, MA; Zhao, M; Zwiebel, JA, 2009
)
0.35
" Recent clinical trials have been investigating new dosing schedules, routes of administration, and combination of decitabine with other agents, including histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors."( Decitabine.
Blagitko-Dorfs, N; Daskalakis, M; Hackanson, B, 2010
)
0.36
" Hematologic AEs, most frequently observed during early treatment cycles, decreased during subsequent cycles and were usually managed with dosing delays (23-29%)."( Management and supportive care measures for adverse events in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes treated with azacitidine*.
Backstrom, J; Beach, CL; Fenaux, P; Gore, SD; Hellström-Lindberg, E; List, A; Mufti, GJ; Santini, V; Seymour, JF; Silverman, LR, 2010
)
0.36
" The present results show the applicability of our novel statistical methodology for quantitatively assessing drug synergy across a wide range of doses of agents with complex dose-response profiles, a methodology with great potential for advancing the development of chemopreventive combinations."( Validation of a novel statistical model for assessing the synergy of combined-agent cancer chemoprevention.
Fujimoto, J; Hong, WK; Kong, M; Lee, JJ; Lotan, R, 2010
)
0.36
"This study aims to determine the optimal dosing and administration route for azacitidine to reduce global DNA methylation levels in the peripheral blood of patients with hematologic malignancies."( A phase I biological study of azacitidine (Vidaza™) to determine the optimal dose to inhibit DNA methylation.
Bernstein, I; Byun, HM; Douer, D; Gorospe, G; Groshen, S; Hergesheimer, J; Mohrbacher, A; O'Connell, C; Yang, AS,
)
0.13
" The hydralazine dose was given according with the acetylator phenotype, and valproate was dosed at 30 mg/kg/day."( Hydralazine and magnesium valproate as epigenetic treatment for myelodysplastic syndrome. Preliminary results of a phase-II trial.
Arias-Bofill, D; Candelaria, M; Cervera, E; de la Cruz-Hernández, E; Dueñas-Gonzalez, A; González-Fierro, A; Herrera, A; Labardini, J; Pérez-Cárdenas, E; Taja-Chayeb, L; Trejo-Becerril, C; Vidal, S, 2011
)
0.37
" Hence, the study on the systems reported herein could provide a good basis for designing aza nucleoside prodrug systems that are less hydrophilic than their parental drugs and can be used, in different dosage forms, to release the parent drug in a controlled manner."( Prodrugs of aza nucleosides based on proton transfer reaction.
Karaman, R, 2010
)
0.36
" The recommended dosage of azacitidine is 75 mg/m(2) daily for 7 days, with different treatment schedules validated."( Safety and efficacy of azacitidine in myelodysplastic syndromes.
Garcia-Manero, G; Martin-Santos, T; Vigil, CE, 2010
)
0.36
" However, the sequential schedule of decitabine 10 mg/m(2)/day on days 1 to 5 and vorinostat 200 mg twice a day on days 6 to 12 was more deliverable than both MTDs with fewer delays on repeated dosing and it represents the recommended phase II (RP2D) dose of this combination."( Phase I study of decitabine in combination with vorinostat in patients with advanced solid tumors and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas.
Chen, EX; Egorin, MJ; Espinoza-Delgado, I; Hirte, HW; Holleran, JL; Hotte, SJ; Laughlin, A; McGill, S; Moretto, P; Oza, AM; Siu, LL; Stathis, A; Stayner, LA; Wang, L; Webster, S; Zhang, WJ, 2011
)
0.37
" The US Food and Drug Administration has approved a 5-day outpatient decitabine dosing regimen, which might reduce administration costs compared with the standard 3-day inpatient regimen."( Economic analysis of decitabine versus best supportive care in the treatment of intermediate- and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes from a US payer perspective.
Fleurence, R; Kim, E; Knopf, K; Linnehan, JE; Pan, F; Peng, S, 2010
)
0.36
"The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of 5-day dosing of decitabine versus BSC in US patients with intermediate- and high-risk MDS from a US payer perspective."( Economic analysis of decitabine versus best supportive care in the treatment of intermediate- and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes from a US payer perspective.
Fleurence, R; Kim, E; Knopf, K; Linnehan, JE; Pan, F; Peng, S, 2010
)
0.36
"In this study, decitabine administered on a 5-day dosing schedule was likely a cost-effective treatment option in patients with intermediate- and high-risk MDS from a US payer perspective."( Economic analysis of decitabine versus best supportive care in the treatment of intermediate- and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes from a US payer perspective.
Fleurence, R; Kim, E; Knopf, K; Linnehan, JE; Pan, F; Peng, S, 2010
)
0.36
" Most importantly, the elevated gene dosage of DNMT3B is associated with increased resistance to the growth-inhibitory effect mediated by DNA demethylating agents."( DNMT3B gene amplification predicts resistance to DNA demethylating drugs.
Esteller, M; Melo, SA; Simó-Riudalbas, L, 2011
)
0.37
" Erlotinib was dosed at 150 mg daily, and 5-azacytidine was escalated by increasing the number of daily doses of 75 mg/m(2) per cycle."( A phase I study of 5-azacytidine and erlotinib in advanced solid tumor malignancies.
Bauman, J; Belinsky, S; Fekrazad, M; Jones, D; Lee, SJ; Muller, C; Ravindranathan, M; Rutledge, T; Verschraegen, C, 2012
)
0.38
" The present study assessed an effective treatment dosage based on the cell viability, cytotoxicity, apoptosis and methylation assays for the investigated cell lines."( Integrated epigenetics of human breast cancer: synoptic investigation of targeted genes, microRNAs and proteins upon demethylation treatment.
Barekati, Z; Bitzer, J; Grussenmeyer, T; Hartmann, N; Jenoe, P; Kohler, C; Lefkovits, I; Letzkus, M; Moes, S; Radpour, R; Schumacher, MM; Staedtler, F; Zhong, XY, 2011
)
0.37
" No grade 3 or 4 nonhematological toxicity was observed during either dosing schedule."( Subcutaneous 5-azacitidine treatment of naturally occurring canine urothelial carcinoma: a novel epigenetic approach to human urothelial carcinoma drug development.
Balch, C; Bonney, PL; Dhawan, D; Fang, F; Guo, Z; Hahn, NM; Hartman-Frey, C; Jones, DR; Knapp, DW; Kwon, EM; Nephew, KP; Ostrander, EA; Parker, HG, 2012
)
0.38
" Migration was affected weakly by combined high dosage irradiation/5‑Aza treatment."( Pharmacological genome demethylation increases radiosensitivity of head and neck squamous carcinoma cells.
Brieger, J; Fruth, K; Koutsimpelas, D; Mann, SA; Mann, WJ; Pongsapich, W, 2012
)
0.38
" A great deal remains to be learned about the optimal dosing and scheduling of the DNMT inhibitors, alone and in combination."( New ways to use DNA methyltransferase inhibitors for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome.
Gore, SD, 2011
)
0.37
" Over the years, the dosing of decitabine has been refined, such that for acute myeloid leukemia, a 5-day schedule of 20 mg/m(2) is now commonly utilized."( Decitabine for acute myeloid leukemia.
Marks, PW, 2012
)
0.38
" Treatment with valproic acid (VPA), a histone deacetylase inhibitor, at 3 dosing regimens (300mg/kg at D2-9PP; 100mg/kg at D2-4PP, 200mg/kg at D5-7PP, 300mg/kg at D8-9PP; 100mg/kg at D2-5PP, 200mg/kg at D6-9PP) prior to daily separation reversed such a decrease in fear-potentiated startle."( Neonatal isolation decreases cued fear conditioning and frontal cortical histone 3 lysine 9 methylation in adult female rats.
Chen, LH; Cheng, LY; Cherng, CG; Kao, GS; Su, CC; Tzeng, WY; Wang, CY; Yu, L, 2012
)
0.38
" This novel dosing schedule has yet to be evaluated in a Phase 3 trial."( The role of decitabine for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia.
Ganetsky, A, 2012
)
0.38
"Differential progression of global DNA hypomethylation was studied by comparatively dosing zebularine (ZEB) and 5-azacytidine (AZA)."( 3-D DNA methylation phenotypes correlate with cytotoxicity levels in prostate and liver cancer cell models.
Gertych, A; Oh, JH; Tajbakhsh, J; Wawrowsky, KA; Weisenberger, DJ, 2013
)
0.39
" The subcutaneous dosing route for consecutive days and reduced bioavailability of 5-azacytidine because of inactivation by cytidine deaminase may limit the expansion of epigenetic therapy into Phase III trials."( Aerosolised 5-azacytidine suppresses tumour growth and reprogrammes the epigenome in an orthotopic lung cancer model.
Belinsky, SA; Cheng, YS; Grimes, MJ; Kuehl, PJ; March, TH; Picchi, MA; Reed, MD; Tellez, CS; Tessema, M, 2013
)
0.39
"5-AZn-2' deoxycytidylic acid had significant inhibition effect on proliferation of A549 cells in vitro, and the inhibition was notably dependent on time and dosage during 48-72 h; SOD level was significantly lower than those of control group (P<0."( Effect of 5- AZn-2 '-deoxycytidine on proliferation of human lung adenocarcinoma cell line A549 in vitro.
Cui, W; Huang, HQ; Li, N; Zhang, GS, 2013
)
0.39
" An oral azacitidine formulation would allow extended dosing schedules, potentially improving safety and/or efficacy."( Pharmacokinetics of different formulations of oral azacitidine (CC-486) and the effect of food and modified gastric pH on pharmacokinetics in subjects with hematologic malignancies.
Boyd, TE; Dong, Q; Laille, E; Savona, MR; Scott, BL; Skikne, B, 2014
)
0.4
" However, the prolonged administration of AZA by itself seems to increase HN rate compared with standard dosing and warrants additional investigation."( Prolonged administration of azacitidine with or without entinostat for myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes: results of the US Leukemia Intergroup trial E1905.
Czader, M; Erba, HP; Figueroa, ME; Gabrilove, J; Gore, SD; Greenberg, PL; Herman, J; Juckett, M; Ketterling, R; Litzow, M; Malick, L; Melnick, A; Paietta, E; Prebet, T; Smith, MR; Sun, Z; Tallman, MS, 2014
)
0.4
" A total of 79 patients received reduced dosage decitabine treatment (15 mg/M2/day intravenously for five consecutive days every four weeks)."( Decitabine of reduced dosage in Chinese patients with myelodysplastic syndrome: a retrospective analysis.
Chang, C; Chen, Y; Hou, M; Li, X; Song, L; Song, Q; Su, J; Wu, D; Wu, L; Xu, F; Zhang, X; Zhang, Z; Zhou, L, 2014
)
0.4
" Recent and ongoing clinical trials investigate new dosing schedules, routes of administration, and combination of decitabine with other agents, including histone deacetylase inhibitors."( Decitabine.
Daskalakis, M; Hackanson, B, 2014
)
0.4
" Patients were treated with azacitidine, with one of three dosage regimens: for 5 days (AZA 5); 7 days including a 2-day break (AZA 5-2-2); or 7 days (AZA 7); all 28-day cycles."( Effectiveness and safety of different azacitidine dosage regimens in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes or acute myeloid leukemia.
Andreu, R; Badiella, L; Bailén, A; Bargay, J; Brunet, S; Casaño, J; de Miguel, D; Falantes, JF; Figueredo, A; García-Delgado, R; González, JR; Jurado, AF; Medina, A; Ramos, F; Sanz, G; Tormo, M, 2014
)
0.4
" First, we defined conditions for which clinically relevant dosing could induce sustained induction of RNA and protein."( A recombinant reporter system for monitoring reactivation of an endogenously DNA hypermethylated gene.
Baylin, SB; Beaty, R; Bunz, F; Cui, Y; Hausheer, F; Issa, JP; Zahnow, C, 2014
)
0.4
" The 75 mg/m2 dosing group received 4 additional days of SC azacitidine."( A phase I study in patients with solid or hematologic malignancies of the dose proportionality of subcutaneous Azacitidine and its pharmacokinetics in patients with severe renal impairment.
Beach, CL; Gabrail, NY; Goel, S; Kelly, K; Laille, E; Liu, L; Mita, AC; Songer, S, 2014
)
0.4
"Azacitidine is dose proportional over the 25-100 mg/m2 dosing range."( A phase I study in patients with solid or hematologic malignancies of the dose proportionality of subcutaneous Azacitidine and its pharmacokinetics in patients with severe renal impairment.
Beach, CL; Gabrail, NY; Goel, S; Kelly, K; Laille, E; Liu, L; Mita, AC; Songer, S, 2014
)
0.4
" HI and red blood cell TI rates were similar regardless of administration route or dosing schedule."( Patients with myelodysplastic syndromes treated with azacitidine in clinical practice: the AVIDA registry.
Grinblatt, DL; Komrokji, RS; Narang, M; Sekeres, MA; Sullivan, KA; Swern, AS, 2015
)
0.42
" We summarize the results of recent preclinical studies and clinical trials for decitabine and discuss the connections among its hypomethylating effect, immune-activated mechanisms and clinical activity in solid tumors, keeping in mind the goal of optimizing dosing schedules."( Decitabine: a promising epi-immunotherapeutic agent in solid tumors.
Fu, X; Han, W; Li, X; Mei, Q; Nie, J, 2015
)
0.42
" To reveal the effect of AZA dosage on infection risk we limited our analysis to the infection rate after the first AZA dose alone."( Higher infection rate after 7- compared with 5-day cycle of azacitidine in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome.
Akria, L; Arad, A; Aviv, A; Braester, A; Dally, N; Filanovsky, K; Gafter-Gvili, A; Gatt, ME; Hellmann, I; Herishanu, Y; Herzog-Tzarfati, K; Leiba, R; Merkel, D; Mittelman, M; Nagler, A; Nemets, A; Ofran, Y; Ronson, A; Rouvio, O; Silbershatz, I; Tadmor, T; Vidal, L; Yeganeh, S, 2015
)
0.42
" All patients were treated with AZA at the standard dosage of 75 mg/m(2)."( Azacytidine for the treatment of retrospective analysis from the Gruppo Laziale for the study of Ph-negative MPN.
Alimena, G; Andriani, A; Andrizzi, C; Ciccone, F; De Gregoris, C; Di Veroli, A; Latagliata, R; Maurillo, L; Montanaro, M; Villivà, N; Voso, MT, 2015
)
0.42
"1% and 30-month overall survival rate after decitabine dosing 61."( [Therapeutic efficacies of decitabine application prior to hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia].
Fu, C; Han, Y; Jin, Z; Liu, H; Ma, L; Miao, M; Qiu, H; Tang, X; Wang, J; Wang, P; Wu, D; Yan, S; Zheng, H; Zhou, J, 2015
)
0.42
" In part 1 of this two-part study, a 7-day CC-486 dosing schedule showed clinical activity, was generally well tolerated, and reduced DNA methylation."( Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics with Extended Dosing of CC-486 in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies.
Cogle, CR; Garcia-Manero, G; Gore, SD; Hetzer, J; Kumar, K; Laille, E; MacBeth, KJ; Shi, T; Skikne, B, 2015
)
0.42
" Median number of CC-486 treatment cycles was 7 (range 2-24) for the 14-day dosing schedule and 6 (1-24) for the 21-day schedule."( Efficacy and safety of extended dosing schedules of CC-486 (oral azacitidine) in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.
Cogle, CR; Edenfield, WJ; Garcia-Manero, G; Gore, SD; Hetzer, J; Kambhampati, S; Kumar, K; Laille, E; MacBeth, KJ; Scott, B; Shi, T; Skikne, B; Tefferi, A, 2016
)
0.43
" Oral administration of azacitidine may enhance patient convenience, eliminate injection-site reactions, allow for alternative dosing and scheduling, and enable long-term treatment."( Oral Azacitidine (CC-486) for the Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Boyd, T; Cogle, CR; Garcia-Manero, G; Scott, BL, 2015
)
0.42
" In vitro experiments suggested that concurrent dosing showed stronger synergy than sequential dosing."( The Hedgehog pathway as targetable vulnerability with 5-azacytidine in myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia.
Al-Kali, A; Bhagavatula, K; Bogenberger, JM; Delman, DH; Foran, JM; Hansen, N; Mesa, RA; Mohan, J; Oliver, GR; Rakhshan, F; Tibes, R; Wood, T, 2015
)
0.42
" The 5-AZA-CdR was selected as a representative demethylation agent to validate the principle of the TDQ method on three levels: significant dose-response relationships between the concentration of 5-AZA-CdR and the methylation level of promoters, mRNA expression level of the EGFP gene, and the fluorescence intensity of EGFP proteins."( A novel quantification method for the total demethylation potential of aquatic sample extracts from Bohai Bay using the EGFP reporter gene.
Guo, C; Han, M; Jiang, Y; Liang, B; Lv, Z; Nie, J; Qian, Y; Wang, X; Wei, Y; Wu, J; Yang, Y; Zhang, J, 2015
)
0.42
"Our results provide an alternative approach for predicting what combinations, dosing and scheduling of drug delivery should be used to better individualize therapy of AML."( Synergisitic and Antagonistic AML Cell Type-specific Responses to 5-Aza-2-deoxycitidine and 1-h-D-Arabinofuranoside.
Arceci, RJ; Elmoneim, AA; Heuston, E; Triche, T; Wai, DH, 2016
)
0.43
"Patients received a median of five cycles of Aza (range, 2-9) and sorafenib with a median daily dosage of 750 mg (range 400-800) for 129 d (range, 61-221)."( Sorafenib and azacitidine as salvage therapy for relapse of FLT3-ITD mutated AML after allo-SCT.
Dienst, A; Germing, U; Haas, R; Heyn, C; Kobbe, G; Kondakci, M; Nachtkamp, K; Rautenberg, C; Schmidt, PV; Schroeder, T, 2017
)
0.46
" Higher rates of treatment discontinuation may partially explain these results, suggesting alternative dosing and schedules to improve tolerability may be required to determine the potential of the combination."( Phase 2, randomized, double-blind study of pracinostat in combination with azacitidine in patients with untreated, higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.
Abaza, Y; Anz, B; Babu, S; Berdeja, JG; Boccia, R; DeZern, AE; Essell, J; Garcia-Manero, G; Ghalie, R; Heller, B; Jabbour, E; Kantarjian, HM; Komrokji, RS; Kuriakose, P; Lyons, RM; Maris, M; Montalban-Bravo, G; Ravandi, F; Reeves, J; Roboz, GJ; Sekeres, MA; Wright, D, 2017
)
0.46
"X-chromosome inactivation is a mechanism of dosage compensation in which one of the two X chromosomes in female mammals is transcriptionally silenced."( A high-throughput small molecule screen identifies synergism between DNA methylation and Aurora kinase pathways for X reactivation.
Bartolomei, MS; Bedalov, A; Carrette, LL; Dial, TO; Hasaka, T; Jadhav, A; Kesner, B; Lee, JT; Lessing, D; Maloney, DJ; Payer, B; Simeonov, A; Szanto, A; Theriault, J; Wei, C, 2016
)
0.43
" The levels of phospho-nuclear factor-kappa B (pNF-ĸB)(Thr) decreased with increasing dosage of Dox in different groups, while down-regulation of heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) was observed only in the AzaC+Dox group of cells."( Azacytidine-induced Chemosensitivity to Doxorubicin in Human Breast Cancer MCF7 Cells.
Khan, GN; Kim, EJ; Lee, SH; Shin, TS, 2017
)
0.46
" To aid clinicians in their daily clinical practice, we also comment on some practical aspects such as dosing and schedule, the choice of HMA and the use of complementary cellular therapies."( Hypomethylating agents for treatment and prevention of relapse after allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation.
Germing, U; Haas, R; Kobbe, G; Rautenberg, C; Schroeder, T, 2018
)
0.48
" Several dose-response experiments were carried out during two periods, including not only the very first days of development (0-6 days post-fertilization, dpf), as done in previous studies, but also, and as a novelty, the period of gonadal development (10-30 dpf)."( Treatment with a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor feminizes zebrafish and induces long-term expression changes in the gonads.
Imués, MA; Piferrer, F; Ribas, L; Vanezis, K, 2017
)
0.46
" By dosing schedule, 24·7% received AZA for seven consecutive days, 12·4% for six consecutive days and 62·9% by 5-2-2."( Azacitidine in the 'real-world': an evaluation of 1101 higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome/low blast count acute myeloid leukaemia patients in Ontario, Canada.
Buckstein, R; Cheung, MC; Fallahpour, S; Gill, T; Lau, O; Maloul, A; Mozessohn, L; Zhang, L, 2018
)
0.48
" Oral CC-486 allows extended dosing to prolong azacitidine activity."( CC-486 Maintenance after Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndromes.
Champlin, RE; Craddock, C; de Lima, M; Giralt, SA; Hetzer, J; Hubbell, B; Laille, E; Oran, B; Papadopoulos, EB; Scott, BL; Skikne, BS; William, BM, 2018
)
0.48
" This study of extended CC-486 dosing included patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), or acute myeloid leukemia (AML)."( Extended dosing with CC-486 (oral azacitidine) in patients with myeloid malignancies.
Becerra, C; Conkling, P; Dong, Q; Kellerman, A; Kingsley, EC; Kolibaba, K; Laille, E; Morris, JC; Rifkin, RM; Savona, MR; Skikne, BS; Ukrainskyj, SM, 2018
)
0.48
" Future studies with higher doses and/or increased dosing frequency are warranted."( Infusion of 5-Azacytidine (5-AZA) into the fourth ventricle or resection cavity in children with recurrent posterior Fossa Ependymoma: a pilot clinical trial.
Fletcher, S; Hagan, J; Miesner, E; Patel, R; Sabin, J; Sandberg, DI; Shah, MN; Sirianni, RW; Smith, S; Taylor, MD; Yu, B, 2019
)
0.51
" These results highlight that stable epigenetic changes are possible following a single dose of RT and may have significant clinical implications for cancer treatment involving recurrent or fractionated dosing regimens."( DNA methylation changes following DNA damage in prostate cancer cells.
Ambrose, M; Berry, R; Brettingham-Moore, KH; Holloway, AF; Jeffreys, SA; Joo, JE; Phillips, JL; Skala, M; Sutton, LP; Taberlay, PC; Young, A, 2019
)
0.51
"Multiple cycles of azacitidine and midostaurin were not well-tolerated, but persistent inhibition of FLT3 wild-type phosphorylation suggest intermittent dosing of midostaurin should be considered in future low-intensity regimens for FLT3-mutant AML."( A Phase II Study of Midostaurin and 5-Azacitidine for Untreated Elderly and Unfit Patients With FLT3 Wild-type Acute Myelogenous Leukemia.
Cooper, BW; Craig, MD; Gallogly, MM; Kane, DM; Lazarus, HM; Levis, MJ; Metheny, L; Tomlinson, BK; William, BM, 2020
)
0.56
"To determine if an oral dosing strategy might be feasible in the clinic with AZA, we attempted to increase the bioavailability of oral AZA through the use of CDZ, in a murine model."( Oral Azacitidine and Cedazuridine Approximate Parenteral Azacitidine Efficacy in Murine Model.
Arrate, M; Azab, M; Boyd, K; Fuller, L; Gorska, AE; Keer, H; Oganesian, A; Ramsey, HE; Savona, MR, 2020
)
0.56
"Following pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessment of oral AZA dosed with CDZ in murine and monkey models, we tested this regimen in vivo with a human cell line-derived xenograft transplantation experiment (CDX)."( Oral Azacitidine and Cedazuridine Approximate Parenteral Azacitidine Efficacy in Murine Model.
Arrate, M; Azab, M; Boyd, K; Fuller, L; Gorska, AE; Keer, H; Oganesian, A; Ramsey, HE; Savona, MR, 2020
)
0.56
" Although extensive data exist for adult myeloid malignancies, there are limited preclinical data on the efficacy and/or dosing of venetoclax for pediatric myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or AML and thus little information to guide use of this regimen in pediatric patients."( Single-center pediatric experience with venetoclax and azacitidine as treatment for myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia.
Franklin, AK; Gore, L; Maloney, KW; Treece, AL; Winters, AC, 2020
)
0.56
" However, as the efficacy and safety of rational dosing regimens are lacking, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of reduced-dose azacitidine (AZA) vs."( Evaluation of Reduced-Dose Decitabine and Azacitidine for Treating Myelodysplastic Syndromes: A Retrospective Study.
Du, X; Hu, N; Pan, L; Qin, T; Qu, S; Wang, B; Wang, X; Xiao, Z; Xu, Z, 2021
)
0.62
" Both HMAs led to objective hematologic or non-hematologic AEs (27%-43%), while dosage modification/delay were more frequent in patients treated with azacitidine (81% vs."( Hypomethylating agents in the treatment of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
Deng, C; Du, X; Geng, S; Huang, X; Li, M; Weng, J; Wu, P; Xu, R, 2021
)
0.62
" Careful patient selection and alternative dosing schedule is needed in future clinical trials to evaluate clinical outcome."( Do histone deacytelase inhibitors and azacitidine combination hold potential as an effective treatment for high/very-high risk myelodysplastic syndromes?
Atallah, E; Badar, T, 2021
)
0.62
" Avelumab was dosed at 3 mg/kg for the first 7 patients and at 10 mg/kg for the subsequent 12 patients."( A phase 1b/2 study of azacitidine with PD-L1 antibody avelumab in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia.
Alexander, L; Andreeff, M; Borthakur, G; Bueso-Ramos, C; Cheung, CM; Daver, N; DiNardo, CD; Garcia-Manero, G; Herbrich, SM; Jabbour, E; Kadia, TM; Konopleva, MY; Kornblau, S; Loghavi, S; Pemmaraju, N; Pierce, SA; Ravandi, F; Saxena, K; Tang, G; Wang, SA, 2021
)
0.62
" AEs infrequently required permanent discontinuation of oral azacitidine (13%), suggesting they were effectively managed with use of concomitant medications and oral azacitidine dosing modifications."( Management of adverse events in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in remission receiving oral azacitidine: experience from the phase 3 randomized QUAZAR AML-001 trial.
Bailey, R; Beach, CL; Chevassut, T; Döhner, H; Dombret, H; Figuera-Alvarez, A; Hiwase, D; La Torre, I; Montesinos, P; Musso, M; Pierdomenico, F; Pocock, C; Ravandi, F; Roboz, GJ; Safah, H; Sayar, H; Selleslag, D; Skikne, B; Sohn, SK; Tse, W; Wei, AH; Zhong, J, 2021
)
0.62
" Although extended dosing may provide the optimal scheduling, the reliance of injectable formulation of the drug limits it to intermittent treatment."( Optimizing DNA hypomethylating therapy in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes.
Lane, SW; Straube, J; Vu, T, 2021
)
0.62
" Oral-AZA allows convenient extended AZA dosing for 14 days per 28-day treatment cycle, which is not feasible with injectable AZA."( Oral Azacitidine (CC-486) for the Treatment of Myeloid Malignancies.
Beach, CL; Döhner, H; Garcia-Manero, G; La Torre, I; Santini, V; Skikne, B; Wei, AH, 2022
)
0.72
" This phase 1/2 open-label study evaluated the safety and efficacy of DSP-7888 dosing emulsion in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)."( Phase 1/2 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of DSP-7888 dosing emulsion in myelodysplastic syndromes.
Aakashi, K; Aotsuka, N; Fujita, J; Goto, M; Iwasaki, H; Kizaki, M; Matsumura, I; Miyazaki, Y; Nakazato, T; Naoe, T; Sekiguchi, N; Sugimoto, S; Takahara-Matsubara, M; Ueda, Y; Usuki, K, 2022
)
0.72
" Additional studies are needed to establish safe dosing for patients with hepatic impairment."( FDA Approval Summary: Oral Azacitidine for Continued Treatment of Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Unable to Complete Intensive Curative Therapy.
de Claro, RA; Gehrke, BJ; Jen, EY; Lee, SL; Leong, R; Li, H; Li, M; Ma, L; McLamore, S; Ni, N; Przepiorka, D; Theoret, MR; Vallejo, J; Wang, X, 2022
)
0.72
" In this review, we discuss the path to regulatory approval of azacitidine and decitabine, highlighting the substantial efforts that have been made to optimize the dosing schedule and administration of these drugs, including the development of new, oral formulations of both agents."( Hypomethylating agents for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia: Past discoveries and future directions.
Kantarjian, H; Short, NJ, 2022
)
0.72
"Low-dose azacitidine (AZA) regimens, primarily 5-day AZA, have been used in lower risk myelodysplastic syndrome (LrMDS) but they have yet to be directly compared to the standard 7-day, uninterrupted dosing schedule."( Five-day versus 7-day treatment regimen with azacitidine in lower risk myelodysplastic syndrome: A phase 2, multicenter, randomized trial.
Choi, EJ; Hong, J; Kim, YJ; Lee, JH; Lee, KH; Park, S; Park, SY; Shin, DY; Yoon, SS, 2022
)
0.72
" However, the dosage of venetoclax is fixed, irrespective of body surface area (BSA) or weight."( Utility of therapeutic drug monitoring of venetoclax in acute myeloid leukemia.
Kobayashi, M; Kosugi, N; Suzaki, K; Yasu, T, 2022
)
0.72
" Given the role of TET2 as a regulator of genomic methylation, we hypothesized that mutant TET2 allele dosage affects response to 5'-Aza."( Biallelic TET2 mutations confer sensitivity to 5'-azacitidine in acute myeloid leukemia.
Alharbi, A; Allan, JM; Allsop, D; Altmann, H; Altschuler, SJ; Ariceta, B; Bell, HL; Blair, H; Bornhäuser, M; Bowes, E; Bziuk, Z; Diaz, RA; Dill, C; Elstob, C; Fadly, M; Fitzgibbon, J; Fordham, SE; Haferlach, T; Heidenreich, O; Jackson, GH; Jones, GL; Kunadt, D; Lin, WY; Marr, HJ; Martinez-Lopez, J; Meggendorfer, M; Menne, T; Mohr, B; Montesinos, P; Nandana, D; Onel, K; Park, C; Piddock, R; Prosper, F; Rahman, T; Robinson, A; Röllig, C; Ruhnke, L; Soura, EN; Stölzel, F; Villar, S; Wagenführ, L; Wobus, M; Wu, LF, 2023
)
0.91
" Dosage adjustments for drug interactions and safety varied between centers."( Retrospective, real-life study of venetoclax plus azacitidine or low-dose cytarabine in French patients with acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.
Belhabri, A; Bertoli, S; Billotey, NC; Bulabois, C; Cartet, E; Dumas, PY; Fornecker, L; Giltat, A; Guepin, GR; Guerineau, E; Houyou, D; Hunault, M; Kaphan, E; Lachenal, F; Laloi, L; Laribi, K; Michallet, AS; Michallet, M; Michel, C; Morisset, S; Paul, F; Pigneux, A; Puisset, F; Récher, C; Rocher, C; Santagostino, A; Simand, C; Simonet, MB; Tabrizi, R; Villate, A, 2023
)
0.91
"To observe the efficacy and safety of different induction regimens of same total dosage of azacitidine (Aza), including standard dose (standard dose group) and low-dose long-term (adjusted dose group), in the treatment of elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML)."( [Multicenter Prospective Study of Different Induction Regimens of Azacytidine in Treatment of Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia].
Chu, XX; Deng, XZ; Liu, XD; Ran, XH; Wang, CZ; Wang, L; Wang, LQ; Yang, EQ; Yu, HY; Zhao, CT, 2023
)
0.91
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (1)

RoleDescription
antineoplastic agentA substance that inhibits or prevents the proliferation of neoplasms.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (2)

ClassDescription
N-glycosyl-1,3,5-triazine
nucleoside analogueAn analogue of a nucleoside, being an N-glycosyl compound in which the nitrogen-containing moiety is a modified nucleotide base. They are commonly used as antiviral products to prevent viral replication in infected cells.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Protein Targets (74)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Chain A, MAJOR APURINIC/APYRIMIDINIC ENDONUCLEASEHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.56230.003245.467312,589.2998AID2517
Chain A, Beta-lactamaseEscherichia coli K-12Potency39.81070.044717.8581100.0000AID485294
interleukin 8Homo sapiens (human)Potency0.94390.047349.480674.9780AID651758
glp-1 receptor, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency2.51190.01846.806014.1254AID624417
pregnane X receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency28.62880.025127.9203501.1870AID651751
RAR-related orphan receptor gammaMus musculus (house mouse)Potency2.02980.006038.004119,952.5996AID1159521; AID1159523
ATAD5 protein, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency7.62850.004110.890331.5287AID493106; AID493107; AID504466; AID504467; AID624248; AID624249; AID624251; AID624252
Fumarate hydrataseHomo sapiens (human)Potency28.93420.00308.794948.0869AID1347053
NFKB1 protein, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency2.23870.02827.055915.8489AID895; AID928
PPM1D proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency13.13730.00529.466132.9993AID1347411
TDP1 proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency5.89410.000811.382244.6684AID686978; AID686979
GLI family zinc finger 3Homo sapiens (human)Potency17.34910.000714.592883.7951AID1259369; AID1259392
ThrombopoietinHomo sapiens (human)Potency3.16230.02517.304831.6228AID917; AID918
AR proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency3.48630.000221.22318,912.5098AID1259243; AID1259247; AID588515; AID588516; AID743035; AID743042; AID743054; AID743063
Smad3Homo sapiens (human)Potency14.50150.00527.809829.0929AID588855
aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family, member A1Homo sapiens (human)Potency22.38720.011212.4002100.0000AID1030
estrogen receptor 2 (ER beta)Homo sapiens (human)Potency5.30800.000657.913322,387.1992AID1259378
nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group I, member 3Homo sapiens (human)Potency28.93140.001022.650876.6163AID1224838; AID1224893
progesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency3.85990.000417.946075.1148AID1346784; AID1347036
cytochrome P450 family 3 subfamily A polypeptide 4Homo sapiens (human)Potency9.24940.01237.983543.2770AID1346984; AID1645841
glucocorticoid receptor [Homo sapiens]Homo sapiens (human)Potency4.57870.000214.376460.0339AID588533; AID720692
retinoic acid nuclear receptor alpha variant 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency37.02930.003041.611522,387.1992AID1159552; AID1159553; AID1159555
retinoid X nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency1.98800.000817.505159.3239AID1159527; AID1159531; AID588544
estrogen-related nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency2.67080.001530.607315,848.9004AID1224819; AID1224820; AID1224821; AID1224841; AID1224842; AID1224848; AID1224849; AID1259401; AID1259403
farnesoid X nuclear receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency1.09640.375827.485161.6524AID743220
pregnane X nuclear receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency7.45930.005428.02631,258.9301AID1346982
estrogen nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency11.52700.000229.305416,493.5996AID588513; AID588514; AID743069; AID743075; AID743078
polyproteinZika virusPotency28.93420.00308.794948.0869AID1347053
67.9K proteinVaccinia virusPotency3.79700.00018.4406100.0000AID720579; AID720580
ParkinHomo sapiens (human)Potency6.51310.819914.830644.6684AID720572
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor deltaHomo sapiens (human)Potency29.69060.001024.504861.6448AID588535; AID743215
peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.89130.001019.414170.9645AID588536
vitamin D (1,25- dihydroxyvitamin D3) receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency31.62280.023723.228263.5986AID588541
arylsulfatase AHomo sapiens (human)Potency3.79331.069113.955137.9330AID720538
IDH1Homo sapiens (human)Potency1.63600.005210.865235.4813AID686970
euchromatic histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2Homo sapiens (human)Potency0.02240.035520.977089.1251AID504332
aryl hydrocarbon receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency11.88320.000723.06741,258.9301AID743085
cytochrome P450, family 19, subfamily A, polypeptide 1, isoform CRA_aHomo sapiens (human)Potency10.98410.001723.839378.1014AID743083
thyroid stimulating hormone receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.11880.001628.015177.1139AID1259385
activating transcription factor 6Homo sapiens (human)Potency22.87560.143427.612159.8106AID1159516; AID1159519
Bloom syndrome protein isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency0.00160.540617.639296.1227AID2364; AID2528
peripheral myelin protein 22 isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency30.131323.934123.934123.9341AID1967
hemoglobin subunit betaHomo sapiens (human)Potency1.25890.31629.086131.6228AID931
cellular tumor antigen p53 isoform aHomo sapiens (human)Potency3.16230.316212.443531.6228AID924
chromobox protein homolog 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency100.00000.006026.168889.1251AID540317
thyroid hormone receptor beta isoform 2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency11.07720.000323.4451159.6830AID743065; AID743067
huntingtin isoform 2Homo sapiens (human)Potency12.58930.000618.41981,122.0200AID1688
ras-related protein Rab-9AHomo sapiens (human)Potency100.00000.00022.621531.4954AID485297
serine/threonine-protein kinase mTOR isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency5.18070.00378.618923.2809AID2660; AID2667; AID2668
nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency2.07680.000627.21521,122.0200AID651741; AID743202; AID743219
urokinase-type plasminogen activator precursorMus musculus (house mouse)Potency0.79430.15855.287912.5893AID540303
plasminogen precursorMus musculus (house mouse)Potency0.79430.15855.287912.5893AID540303
urokinase plasminogen activator surface receptor precursorMus musculus (house mouse)Potency0.79430.15855.287912.5893AID540303
gemininHomo sapiens (human)Potency2.29680.004611.374133.4983AID463097; AID504364; AID624296; AID624297
peripheral myelin protein 22Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency0.01610.005612.367736.1254AID624032
histone acetyltransferase KAT2A isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency31.62280.251215.843239.8107AID504327
muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency1.12200.00106.000935.4813AID943
lamin isoform A-delta10Homo sapiens (human)Potency3.45690.891312.067628.1838AID1459; AID1487
Interferon betaHomo sapiens (human)Potency13.13730.00339.158239.8107AID1347411
Cellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)Potency3.73630.002319.595674.0614AID651631; AID651743; AID720552
Integrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)Potency3.16230.316211.415731.6228AID924
Integrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)Potency3.16230.316211.415731.6228AID924
D(1A) dopamine receptorSus scrofa (pig)Potency0.73620.00378.108123.2809AID2667
Nuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)Potency3.34910.026622.448266.8242AID651802
Spike glycoproteinSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusPotency28.18380.009610.525035.4813AID1479145
ATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)Potency3.94780.011917.942071.5630AID651632; AID720516
Ataxin-2Homo sapiens (human)Potency7.97810.011912.222168.7989AID588378; AID651632
ATP-dependent phosphofructokinaseTrypanosoma brucei brucei TREU927Potency0.38150.060110.745337.9330AID485367; AID485368
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Adenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)Ki2.84500.00000.930610.0000AID1802102
DNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.30000.01861.64886.0000AID1505769
Adenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)Ki2.84500.00001.06099.7920AID1802102
Adenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)Ki2.84500.00020.931610.0000AID1802102
Multidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)500.00000.01002.765610.0000AID721754
Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)10.00000.00251.14809.2000AID1505768
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (378)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
cell surface receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STATInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STATInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of autophagyInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine-mediated signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
natural killer cell activationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-serine phosphorylation of STAT proteinInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to interferon-betaInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell proliferationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of viral genome replicationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
innate immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of innate immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of MHC class I biosynthetic processInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of T cell differentiationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
defense response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
type I interferon-mediated signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
neuron cellular homeostasisInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of Lewy body formationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of T-helper 2 cell cytokine productionInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell differentiationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
natural killer cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
adaptive immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
T cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
humoral immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycle G2/M phase transitionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ER overload responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucose starvationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
in utero embryonic developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
somitogenesisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
release of cytochrome c from mitochondriaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
hematopoietic progenitor cell differentiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell proliferation involved in immune responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
B cell lineage commitmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell lineage commitmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to ischemiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleotide-excision repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
double-strand break repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein import into nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
autophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in cell cycle arrestCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in transcription of p21 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
Ras protein signal transductionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
gastrulationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
neuroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of neuroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein localizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA replicationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
determination of adult lifespanCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
rRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to salt stressCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to inorganic substanceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to X-rayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to gamma radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle cell apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cardiac muscle cell apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
glial cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
viral processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
glucose catabolic process to lactate via pyruvateCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cerebellum developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell growthCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitotic G1 DNA damage checkpoint signalingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of telomere maintenance via telomeraseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell differentiation in thymusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
tumor necrosis factor-mediated signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of tissue remodelingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to UVCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
multicellular organism growthCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of mitochondrial membrane permeabilityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucose starvationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
entrainment of circadian clock by photoperiodCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial DNA repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neuron apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription initiation-coupled chromatin remodelingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of proteolysisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of RNA polymerase II transcription preinitiation complex assemblyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to antibioticCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
fibroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of fibroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
circadian behaviorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
bone marrow developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
embryonic organ developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein stabilizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of helicase activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein tetramerizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromosome organizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
neuron apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
hematopoietic stem cell differentiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of glial cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
type II interferon-mediated signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac septum morphogenesisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of programmed necrotic cell deathCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complex assemblyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to endoplasmic reticulum stressCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
thymocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of thymocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
necroptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to hypoxiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to xenobiotic stimulusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to ionizing radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to gamma radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to UV-CCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
stem cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to actinomycin DCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of release of cytochrome c from mitochondriaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
replicative senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
oxidative stress-induced premature senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
oligodendrocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of execution phase of apoptosisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of mitophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of mitochondrial membrane permeability involved in apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of G1 to G0 transitionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of miRNA processingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of glucose catabolic process to lactate via pyruvateCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of pentose-phosphate shuntCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to hypoxiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of fibroblast apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of stem cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cellular senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of low-density lipoprotein receptor activityIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein phosphorylationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of endothelial cell proliferationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell-matrix adhesionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cell-substrate junction assemblyIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cell adhesionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cell-matrix adhesionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
integrin-mediated signaling pathwayIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
embryo implantationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
blood coagulationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of endothelial cell migrationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of macrophage derived foam cell differentiationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of fibroblast migrationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of lipid storageIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
response to activityIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
smooth muscle cell migrationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of smooth muscle cell migrationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
platelet activationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor signaling pathwayIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cell-substrate adhesionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
activation of protein kinase activityIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of lipid transportIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of protein localizationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of actin cytoskeleton organizationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cell adhesion mediated by integrinIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell adhesion mediated by integrinIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of osteoblast proliferationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
heterotypic cell-cell adhesionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
substrate adhesion-dependent cell spreadingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
tube developmentIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
wound healing, spreading of epidermal cellsIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to platelet-derived growth factor stimulusIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
apolipoprotein A-I-mediated signaling pathwayIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
wound healingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
apoptotic cell clearanceIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of bone resorptionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of angiogenesisIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of bone resorptionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
symbiont entry into host cellIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
platelet-derived growth factor receptor signaling pathwayIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of fibroblast proliferationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
mesodermal cell differentiationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of smooth muscle cell proliferationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of lipoprotein metabolic processIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
negative chemotaxisIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of release of sequestered calcium ion into cytosolIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of serotonin uptakeIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
angiogenesis involved in wound healingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascadeIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
platelet aggregationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to mechanical stimulusIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to xenobiotic stimulusIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of glomerular mesangial cell proliferationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
blood coagulation, fibrin clot formationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
maintenance of postsynaptic specialization structureIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of postsynaptic neurotransmitter receptor internalizationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of postsynaptic neurotransmitter receptor diffusion trappingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of substrate adhesion-dependent cell spreadingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of adenylate cyclase-inhibiting opioid receptor signaling pathwayIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of trophoblast cell migrationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of extracellular matrix organizationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to insulin-like growth factor stimulusIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of endothelial cell apoptotic processIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of T cell migrationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cell migrationIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of leukocyte migrationIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
cell-matrix adhesionIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
integrin-mediated signaling pathwayIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
angiogenesisIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
cell-cell adhesionIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
cell adhesion mediated by integrinIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
inflammatory responseAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
signal transductionAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
activation of adenylate cyclase activityAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart contractionAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
response to woundingAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of norepinephrine secretionAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell migrationAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of NF-kappaB transcription factor activityAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
presynaptic modulation of chemical synaptic transmissionAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled adenosine receptor signaling pathwayAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
DNA methylation-dependent heterochromatin formationDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-templated transcriptionDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
methylationDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
epigenetic programming of gene expressionDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expression via chromosomal CpG island methylationDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to amino acid stimulusDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
chromosomal DNA methylation maintenance following DNA replicationDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to bisphenol ADNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of vascular associated smooth muscle cell proliferationDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of vascular associated smooth muscle cell apoptotic processDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of vascular associated smooth muscle cell differentiation involved in phenotypic switchingDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
synaptic transmission, dopaminergicAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
response to amphetamineAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
phagocytosisAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
apoptotic processAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
inflammatory responseAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
cellular defense responseAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-modulating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
protein kinase C-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
cell-cell signalingAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
synaptic transmission, cholinergicAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
central nervous system developmentAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
blood coagulationAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
sensory perceptionAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
locomotory behaviorAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
blood circulationAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
response to inorganic substanceAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of glutamate secretionAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of acetylcholine secretion, neurotransmissionAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of norepinephrine secretionAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
response to purine-containing compoundAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
response to caffeineAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of synaptic transmission, GABAergicAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
synaptic transmission, glutamatergicAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of urine volumeAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
vasodilationAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
eating behaviorAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of vascular permeabilityAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of neuron apoptotic processAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of circadian sleep/wake cycle, sleepAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of alpha-beta T cell activationAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
astrocyte activationAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
neuron projection morphogenesisAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein secretionAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of inflammatory responseAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of mitochondrial membrane potentialAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarizationAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of calcium ion transportAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of synaptic transmission, glutamatergicAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
excitatory postsynaptic potentialAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
inhibitory postsynaptic potentialAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
prepulse inhibitionAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
apoptotic signaling pathwayAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
presynaptic modulation of chemical synaptic transmissionAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of long-term synaptic potentiationAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic signaling pathwayAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled adenosine receptor signaling pathwayAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
temperature homeostasisAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
response to hypoxiaAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled adenosine receptor signaling pathwayAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of respiratory gaseous exchange by nervous system processAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of acute inflammatory responseAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of leukocyte migrationAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptide secretionAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of systemic arterial blood pressureAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of systemic arterial blood pressureAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of glomerular filtrationAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
protein targeting to membraneAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
phagocytosisAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
inflammatory responseAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
signal transductionAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-inhibiting G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
cell-cell signalingAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
nervous system developmentAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
response to inorganic substanceAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of glutamate secretionAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
response to purine-containing compoundAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
lipid catabolic processAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of synaptic transmission, GABAergicAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of nucleoside transportAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of neurotrophin productionAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein dephosphorylationAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
vasodilationAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of circadian sleep/wake cycle, non-REM sleepAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic processAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of potassium ion transportAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of MAPK cascadeAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of hormone secretionAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
cognitionAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
leukocyte migrationAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
detection of temperature stimulus involved in sensory perception of painAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of lipid catabolic processAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of lipid catabolic processAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of sensory perception of painAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of synaptic transmission, glutamatergicAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
fatty acid homeostasisAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
excitatory postsynaptic potentialAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
long-term synaptic depressionAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
mucus secretionAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of mucus secretionAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
triglyceride homeostasisAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cardiac muscle cell contractionAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
apoptotic signaling pathwayAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of presynaptic cytosolic calcium ion concentrationAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of long-term synaptic potentiationAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of long-term synaptic depressionAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IINuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of glucose metabolic processNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of steroid metabolic processNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular receptor signaling pathwayNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
circadian regulation of gene expressionNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to sterolNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of circadian rhythmNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of fat cell differentiationNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
adipose tissue developmentNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
T-helper 17 cell differentiationNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IINuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
organic cation transportMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
putrescine transportMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
thiamine transmembrane transportMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
amino acid import across plasma membraneMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
L-arginine import across plasma membraneMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
L-alpha-amino acid transmembrane transportMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
proton transmembrane transportMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
L-arginine transmembrane transportMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic detoxification by transmembrane export across the plasma membraneMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to starvationHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA replicationHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
DNA methylation-dependent heterochromatin formationHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
synaptonemal complex assemblyHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
spermatid developmentHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
long-term memoryHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
fertilizationHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
peptidyl-lysine dimethylationHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of protein modification processHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
organ growthHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
phenotypic switchingHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expression via chromosomal CpG island methylationHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
behavioral response to cocaineHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
oocyte developmentHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
neuron fate specificationHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
response to fungicideHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to cocaineHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to xenobiotic stimulusHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of autophagosome assemblyHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
cell population proliferationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of B cell proliferationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear DNA replicationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
signal transduction in response to DNA damageATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
isotype switchingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA replicationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of isotype switching to IgG isotypesATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
DNA clamp unloadingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of mitotic cell cycle phase transitionATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell cycle G2/M phase transitionATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of receptor internalizationAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of translationAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA metabolic processAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
P-body assemblyAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
stress granule assemblyAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA transportAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (96)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
cytokine activityInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine receptor bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
type I interferon receptor bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
chloramphenicol O-acetyltransferase activityInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
transcription cis-regulatory region bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
core promoter sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
TFIID-class transcription factor complex bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription repressor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protease bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
p53 bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromatin bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA 3'-UTR bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
copper ion bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
receptor tyrosine kinase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase regulator activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ATP-dependent DNA/DNA annealing activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein heterodimerization activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-folding chaperone bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein phosphatase 2A bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II-specific DNA-binding transcription factor bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
14-3-3 protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
MDM2/MDM4 family protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
disordered domain specific bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
general transcription initiation factor bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
molecular function activator activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
promoter-specific chromatin bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
fibroblast growth factor bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
C-X3-C chemokine bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
insulin-like growth factor I bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
neuregulin bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
virus receptor activityIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
fibronectin bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
protease bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
protein disulfide isomerase activityIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
protein kinase C bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
platelet-derived growth factor receptor bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
integrin bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
coreceptor activityIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cell adhesion molecule bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular matrix bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
fibrinogen bindingIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular matrix bindingIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
molecular adaptor activityIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
fibrinogen bindingIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
integrin bindingIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled adenosine receptor activityAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
RNA bindingDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
DNA (cytosine-5-)-methyltransferase activityDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
methyl-CpG bindingDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-methyltransferase activityDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
promoter-specific chromatin bindingDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled adenosine receptor activityAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
calmodulin bindingAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
lipid bindingAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
type 5 metabotropic glutamate receptor bindingAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complex bindingAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
alpha-actinin bindingAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor bindingAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
purine nucleoside bindingAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
heat shock protein bindingAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
G-protein beta/gamma-subunit complex bindingAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
heterotrimeric G-protein bindingAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
protein heterodimerization activityAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled adenosine receptor activityAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription repressor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activityNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
oxysterol bindingNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
ligand-activated transcription factor activityNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
sequence-specific double-stranded DNA bindingNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear receptor activityNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
organic cation transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
L-amino acid transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
thiamine transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
antiporter activityMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
putrescine transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
L-arginine transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
polyspecific organic cation:proton antiporter activityMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II transcription regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
transcription corepressor bindingHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
p53 bindingHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
protein-lysine N-methyltransferase activityHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
histone H3K9 methyltransferase activityHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
histone H3K27 methyltransferase activityHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
C2H2 zinc finger domain bindingHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
histone H3K56 methyltransferase activityHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
histone H3K9me2 methyltransferase activityHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
promoter-specific chromatin bindingHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
DNA clamp unloader activityATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
RNA bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
epidermal growth factor receptor bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (71)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
extracellular spaceInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear bodyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
replication forkCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial matrixCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
centrosomeCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear matrixCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
PML bodyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription repressor complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
site of double-strand breakCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
germ cell nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromatinCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription regulator complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
glutamatergic synapseIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cell-cell junctionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
focal adhesionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
external side of plasma membraneIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
platelet alpha granule membraneIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
lamellipodium membraneIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
filopodium membraneIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
microvillus membraneIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
ruffle membraneIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
integrin alphav-beta3 complexIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
melanosomeIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
synapseIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic membraneIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
integrin alphaIIb-beta3 complexIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
glycinergic synapseIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
integrin complexIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
alphav-beta3 integrin-PKCalpha complexIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
alphav-beta3 integrin-IGF-1-IGF1R complexIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
alphav-beta3 integrin-HMGB1 complexIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
receptor complexIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
alphav-beta3 integrin-vitronectin complexIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
alpha9-beta1 integrin-ADAM8 complexIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
focal adhesionIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
synapseIntegrin beta-3Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
focal adhesionIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
platelet alpha granule membraneIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
integrin alphaIIb-beta3 complexIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
blood microparticleIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
integrin complexIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
external side of plasma membraneIntegrin alpha-IIbHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
presynaptic membraneAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
Schaffer collateral - CA1 synapseAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
dendriteAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
synapseAdenosine receptor A3Homo sapiens (human)
female germ cell nucleusDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
replication forkDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
pericentric heterochromatinDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
intermediate filamentAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
membraneAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
dendriteAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
axolemmaAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
asymmetric synapseAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
presynaptic membraneAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell bodyAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic membraneAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
presynaptic active zoneAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
glutamatergic synapseAdenosine receptor A2aHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
axolemmaAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
asymmetric synapseAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
presynaptic membraneAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell bodyAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
terminal boutonAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
dendritic spineAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
calyx of HeldAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic membraneAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
presynaptic active zoneAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
synapseAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
dendriteAdenosine receptor A1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear bodyNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
chromatinNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusNuclear receptor ROR-gammaHomo sapiens (human)
virion membraneSpike glycoproteinSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus
plasma membraneMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
membraneMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear speckHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
chromatinHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
Elg1 RFC-like complexATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
trans-Golgi networkAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic stress granuleAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
membraneAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
ribonucleoprotein complexAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic stress granuleAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (238)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1347059CD47-SIRPalpha protein protein interaction - Alpha assay qHTS validation2019PloS one, , Volume: 14, Issue:7
Quantitative high-throughput screening assays for the discovery and development of SIRPα-CD47 interaction inhibitors.
AID1347151Optimization of GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors: Unlinked NS2B-NS3 protease assay2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347410qHTS for inhibitors of adenylyl cyclases using a fission yeast platform: a pilot screen against the NCATS LOPAC library2019Cellular signalling, 08, Volume: 60A fission yeast platform for heterologous expression of mammalian adenylyl cyclases and high throughput screening.
AID1347058CD47-SIRPalpha protein protein interaction - HTRF assay qHTS validation2019PloS one, , Volume: 14, Issue:7
Quantitative high-throughput screening assays for the discovery and development of SIRPα-CD47 interaction inhibitors.
AID1347405qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS LOPAC collection2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1347057CD47-SIRPalpha protein protein interaction - LANCE assay qHTS validation2019PloS one, , Volume: 14, Issue:7
Quantitative high-throughput screening assays for the discovery and development of SIRPα-CD47 interaction inhibitors.
AID1505768Inhibition of human G9a using biotinylated-H3K9 peptide as substrate after 1 hr in presence of SAM by TR-FRET assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-09, Volume: 61, Issue:15
Discovery of Reversible DNA Methyltransferase and Lysine Methyltransferase G9a Inhibitors with Antitumoral in Vivo Efficacy.
AID1148522Antitumor activity against mouse P388 cells allografted in ip dosed mouse assessed as dose required for maximal activity administered qd from day 1 to day 9 post tumor implantation1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1465530Toxicity in NOD.SCID mouse assessed as maximum mean body weight loss at 8 mg/kg, iv qd for every 7 days (Rvb = 9%)2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-26, Volume: 60, Issue:20
Discovery of N-(4-(2,4-Difluorophenoxy)-3-(6-methyl-7-oxo-6,7-dihydro-1H-pyrrolo[2,3-c]pyridin-4-yl)phenyl)ethanesulfonamide (ABBV-075/Mivebresib), a Potent and Orally Available Bromodomain and Extraterminal Domain (BET) Family Bromodomain Inhibitor.
AID1133459Toxicity in mouse L1210 cells allografted CDF1 mouse assessed as change in body weight between day 1 and day 9 at 2.5 mg/kg, ip dosed on days 1, 5 and 91978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 21, Issue:2
Isolation, characterization, and properties of a labile hydrolysis product of the antitumor nucleoside, 5-azacytidine.
AID409950Inhibition of human brain MAOA2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-13, Volume: 51, Issue:21
Quantitative structure-activity relationship and complex network approach to monoamine oxidase A and B inhibitors.
AID409952Inhibition of human brain MAOB2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-13, Volume: 51, Issue:21
Quantitative structure-activity relationship and complex network approach to monoamine oxidase A and B inhibitors.
AID355582Antiproliferative activity against human HT-29 cells at 0.01 ug after 48 hrs by two-layer agar-diffusion method
AID1148519Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in ip dosed mouse assessed as dose required for maximal activity administered qd from day 1 to day 9 post tumor implantation1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1437967Antiproliferative activity against human SKM1-R cells after 48 hrs by XTT assay2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-23, Volume: 60, Issue:4
In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation of Fully Substituted (5-(3-Ethoxy-3-oxopropynyl)-4-(ethoxycarbonyl)-1,2,3-triazolyl-glycosides as Original Nucleoside Analogues to Circumvent Resistance in Myeloid Malignancies.
AID1133448Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in CDF1 mouse assessed as increase in life span at 2.5 mg/kg, ip relative to control1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 21, Issue:2
Isolation, characterization, and properties of a labile hydrolysis product of the antitumor nucleoside, 5-azacytidine.
AID1148506Antitumor activity against mouse B16 cells allografted in ip dosed mouse assessed as dose required for minimal activity administered qd from day 1 to day 9 post tumor implantation1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID355586Antiproliferative activity against mouse P388 cells at 0.01 ug after 48 hrs by two-layer agar-diffusion method
AID99173Cross resistance profile versus L1210/R71 cells.1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 33, Issue:7
Structure-activity relationships of antineoplastic agents in multidrug resistance.
AID1474167Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring verified drug-induced liver injury concern status2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID540210Clearance in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1148482Antitumor activity against mouse P388 cells allografted in ip dosed mouse assessed as change in body weight at optimal dose administered qd from day 1 to day 9 post tumor implantation measured on day 5 relative to control1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1419794Growth inhibition of human KB cells2017Journal of natural products, 11-22, Volume: 80, Issue:11
Natural Products with Heteroatom-Rich Ring Systems.
AID1148501Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in ip dosed mouse assessed as dose required for minimal activity administered every 6 hrs on day 1, 5 and 9 post tumor implantation1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1298411Antiviral activity against VSV-G pseudotyped HIV-1 NL4-3 infected in human U373-MAGI cells assessed as reduction in gag level at 25 to 400 uM after 2 to 72 hrs by qPCR method2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 06-01, Volume: 24, Issue:11
Synergistic reduction of HIV-1 infectivity by 5-azacytidine and inhibitors of ribonucleotide reductase.
AID1437985Antiproliferative activity against human SKM1-S cells after 48 hrs by DAPI-staining-based flow cytometric method2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-23, Volume: 60, Issue:4
In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation of Fully Substituted (5-(3-Ethoxy-3-oxopropynyl)-4-(ethoxycarbonyl)-1,2,3-triazolyl-glycosides as Original Nucleoside Analogues to Circumvent Resistance in Myeloid Malignancies.
AID1288538Inhibition of UHRF1 in human MCF7 cells assessed as decrease in methylation at RAR beta exon at 15 uM after 72 hrs by methylation specific-PCR method2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, May-23, Volume: 114Tandem virtual screening targeting the SRA domain of UHRF1 identifies a novel chemical tool modulating DNA methylation.
AID1148514Toxicity in ip dosed mouse allografted with mouse P388 cells assessed as dose required for optimal activity administered qd from day 1 to day 9 post tumor implantation1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1148532Cytotoxicity against mouse L1210 cells assessed as cessation of growth in presence of cytidine1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1148490Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in ip dosed mouse assessed as increase in life span at optimal dose administered qd on day 1 post tumor implantation relative to control1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1148494Antitumor activity against 5-azacytidine-resistant mouse L1210 cells allografted in ip dosed mouse assessed as increase in life span at optimal dose administered qd from day 1 to day 9 post tumor implantation relative to control1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1465526Toxicity in iv dosed NOD.SCID mouse xenografted with gamma-irradiated human Kasumi-1 cells administered as qd for every 7 days2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-26, Volume: 60, Issue:20
Discovery of N-(4-(2,4-Difluorophenoxy)-3-(6-methyl-7-oxo-6,7-dihydro-1H-pyrrolo[2,3-c]pyridin-4-yl)phenyl)ethanesulfonamide (ABBV-075/Mivebresib), a Potent and Orally Available Bromodomain and Extraterminal Domain (BET) Family Bromodomain Inhibitor.
AID1148478Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in ip dosed mouse assessed as change in body weight at optimal dose administered qd from day 1 to day 9 post tumor implantation measured on day 5 relative to control1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1298422Antiviral activity against VSV-G pseudotyped HIV-1 NL4-3 infected in human U373-MAGI cells assessed as Env mutation at 260 uM incubated for 2 hrs prior to infection measured at 72 hrs post infection by illumina sequencing method (Rvb = 21.4%)2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 06-01, Volume: 24, Issue:11
Synergistic reduction of HIV-1 infectivity by 5-azacytidine and inhibitors of ribonucleotide reductase.
AID1134737Toxicity in CDF1 mouse assessed as change in body weight at 12.5 mg/kg, ip measured on day 5 relative to control1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
Synthesis and antitumor activity of 5-azacytosine arabinoside.
AID1419773Antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli2017Journal of natural products, 11-22, Volume: 80, Issue:11
Natural Products with Heteroatom-Rich Ring Systems.
AID1148483Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in ip dosed mouse assessed as change in body weight at optimal dose administered qd from day 1 to day 9 post intracerebral tumor implantation measured on day 5 relative to control1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1298419Antiviral activity against VSV-G pseudotyped HIV-1 NL4-3 infected in human U373-MAGI cells assessed as Gag mutation at 260 uM incubated for 2 hrs prior to infection measured at 72 hrs post infection by illumina sequencing method (Rvb = 18.4%)2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 06-01, Volume: 24, Issue:11
Synergistic reduction of HIV-1 infectivity by 5-azacytidine and inhibitors of ribonucleotide reductase.
AID1079932Highest frequency of moderate liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% BIOL' in source]
AID1148500Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in ip dosed mouse assessed as dose required for minimal activity administered qd on day 1, 5 and 9 post tumor implantation1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1079931Moderate liver toxicity, defined via clinical-chemistry results: ALT or AST serum activity 6 times the normal upper limit (N) or alkaline phosphatase serum activity of 1.7 N. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'BIOL' in source]
AID1298414Antiviral activity against VSV-G pseudotyped HIV-1 NL4-3 infected in human U373-MAGI cells assessed as reduction in U5-gag level at 25 to 400 uM after 2 to 72 hrs by qPCR method2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 06-01, Volume: 24, Issue:11
Synergistic reduction of HIV-1 infectivity by 5-azacytidine and inhibitors of ribonucleotide reductase.
AID355578Antiproliferative activity against human HT-29 cells after 96 hrs by MTT assay
AID1505769Inhibition of human DNMT1 using polydeoxyinosine polydeoxycytosine DNA as substrate after 15 mins in presence of SAM by TR-FRET assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-09, Volume: 61, Issue:15
Discovery of Reversible DNA Methyltransferase and Lysine Methyltransferase G9a Inhibitors with Antitumoral in Vivo Efficacy.
AID1134742Toxicity in CDF1 mouse assessed as change in body weight at 1.56 mg/kg, ip measured on day 5 relative to control1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
Synthesis and antitumor activity of 5-azacytosine arabinoside.
AID355583Antiproliferative activity against mouse P388 cells after 48 hrs by MTT assay
AID1148499Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in ip dosed mouse assessed as dose required for minimal activity administered qd on day 1 post tumor implantation1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID540209Volume of distribution at steady state in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1148513Toxicity in ip dosed mouse allografted with mouse L1210 cells assessed as dose required for optimal activity administered qd from day 1 to day 9 post intracerebral tumor implantation1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1148495Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in po dosed mouse assessed as increase in life span at optimal dose administered qd from day 1 to day 9 post tumor implantation relative to control1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1134729Antitumor activity in mouse L1210 cells allografted in CDF1 mouse assessed as increase in life span at 0.78 mg/kg, ip administered as qd for 9 days relative to control1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
Synthesis and antitumor activity of 5-azacytosine arabinoside.
AID1079944Benign tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.BEN' in source]
AID1079941Liver damage due to vascular disease: peliosis hepatitis, hepatic veno-occlusive disease, Budd-Chiari syndrome. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'VASC' in source]
AID1079936Choleostatic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is < 2 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHOLE' in source]
AID1148486Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in ip dosed mouse assessed as change in body weight at optimal dose administered every 6 hrs on day 1, 5 and 9 post tumor implantation measured on day 5 relative to control1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1323835Displacement of [3H]rosiglitazone from recombinant human C-terminal His-tagged MitoNEET cytosolic domain (32 to 108 residues) expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 by Cheng-Prusoff analysis2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 11-01, Volume: 26, Issue:21
Identification of small molecules that bind to the mitochondrial protein mitoNEET.
AID1134727Antitumor activity in mouse L1210 cells allografted in CDF1 mouse assessed as increase in life span at 3.12 mg/kg, ip administered as qd for 9 days relative to control1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
Synthesis and antitumor activity of 5-azacytosine arabinoside.
AID588210Human drug-induced liver injury (DILI) modelling dataset from Ekins et al2010Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Dec, Volume: 38, Issue:12
A predictive ligand-based Bayesian model for human drug-induced liver injury.
AID1298347Antiviral activity against VSV-G pseudotyped HIV-1 NL4-3 infected in human U373-MAGI cells assessed as C to G transversion at 260 uM incubated for 2 hrs prior to infection measured at 72 hrs post infection by illumina sequencing method relative to control2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 06-01, Volume: 24, Issue:11
Synergistic reduction of HIV-1 infectivity by 5-azacytidine and inhibitors of ribonucleotide reductase.
AID1298421Antiviral activity against VSV-G pseudotyped HIV-1 NL4-3 infected in human U373-MAGI cells assessed as Vif mutation at 260 uM incubated for 2 hrs prior to infection measured at 72 hrs post infection by illumina sequencing method (Rvb = 19.2%)2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 06-01, Volume: 24, Issue:11
Synergistic reduction of HIV-1 infectivity by 5-azacytidine and inhibitors of ribonucleotide reductase.
AID1148529Therapeutic index, ratio of toxicity in ip dosed mouse allografted with mouse L1210 cells assessed as optimal dose required for maximum increase in life span to antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in ip dosed mouse assessed as lowest 1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID540213Half life in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1148497Antitumor activity against mouse P388 cells allografted in ip dosed mouse assessed as increase in life span at optimal dose administered qd from day 1 to day 9 post tumor implantation relative to control1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1079940Granulomatous liver disease, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'GRAN' in source]
AID1134744Drug degradation in water solution at 25 degC after 5.5 hrs by reverse phase liquid chromatography1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
Synthesis and antitumor activity of 5-azacytosine arabinoside.
AID1079938Chronic liver disease either proven histopathologically, or through a chonic elevation of serum amino-transferase activity after 6 months. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHRON' in source]
AID1148530Therapeutic index, ratio of toxicity in ip dosed mouse allografted with mouse L1210 cells assessed as highest dose required for 40% increase in life span to antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in ip dosed mouse assessed as lowest dose1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID588211Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in humans2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID23271Partition coefficient (logD7.4)1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 33, Issue:7
Structure-activity relationships of antineoplastic agents in multidrug resistance.
AID1133455Toxicity in mouse L1210 cells allografted CDF1 mouse assessed as change in body weight between day 1 and day 9 at 40 mg/kg, ip dosed on days 1, 5 and 91978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 21, Issue:2
Isolation, characterization, and properties of a labile hydrolysis product of the antitumor nucleoside, 5-azacytidine.
AID540212Mean residence time in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1437984Antiproliferative activity against human SKM1-S cells after 48 hrs by XTT assay2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-23, Volume: 60, Issue:4
In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation of Fully Substituted (5-(3-Ethoxy-3-oxopropynyl)-4-(ethoxycarbonyl)-1,2,3-triazolyl-glycosides as Original Nucleoside Analogues to Circumvent Resistance in Myeloid Malignancies.
AID1148498Antitumor activity against mouse B16 cells allografted in ip dosed mouse assessed as increase in life span at optimal dose administered qd from day 1 to day 9 post tumor implantation relative to control1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1134739Toxicity in CDF1 mouse assessed as change in body weight at 6.25 mg/kg, ip measured on day 5 relative to control1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
Synthesis and antitumor activity of 5-azacytosine arabinoside.
AID1079948Times to onset, minimal and maximal, observed in the indexed observations. [column 'DELAI' in source]
AID1079946Presence of at least one case with successful reintroduction. [column 'REINT' in source]
AID408557Antiproliferative activity against human 5637 cells after 96 hrs by crystal violet assay2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 16, Issue:10
Synthesis of indirubin-N'-glycosides and their anti-proliferative activity against human cancer cell lines.
AID1133450Toxicity in mouse L1210 cells allografted CDF1 mouse assessed as change in body weight between day 1 and day 5 at 40 mg/kg, ip dosed on days 1 and 51978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 21, Issue:2
Isolation, characterization, and properties of a labile hydrolysis product of the antitumor nucleoside, 5-azacytidine.
AID1298420Antiviral activity against VSV-G pseudotyped HIV-1 NL4-3 infected in human U373-MAGI cells assessed as Pol mutation at 260 uM incubated for 2 hrs prior to infection measured at 72 hrs post infection by illumina sequencing method (Rvb = 18.5%)2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 06-01, Volume: 24, Issue:11
Synergistic reduction of HIV-1 infectivity by 5-azacytidine and inhibitors of ribonucleotide reductase.
AID1148520Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in po dosed mouse assessed as dose required for maximal activity administered qd from day 1 to day 9 post tumor implantation1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1148484Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in po dosed mouse assessed as change in body weight at optimal dose administered qd from day 1 to day 9 post tumor implantation measured on day 5 relative to control1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID721753Inhibition of human MATE1-mediated ASP+ uptake expressed in HEK293 cells at 20 uM after 1.5 mins by fluorescence assay2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 56, Issue:3
Discovery of potent, selective multidrug and toxin extrusion transporter 1 (MATE1, SLC47A1) inhibitors through prescription drug profiling and computational modeling.
AID1148517Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in ip dosed mouse assessed as dose required for maximal activity administered qd on day 1, 5 and 9 post tumor implantation1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1148516Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in ip dosed mouse assessed as dose required for maximal activity administered qd on day 1 post tumor implantation1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID408560Antiproliferative activity against human MCF7 cells after 96 hrs by crystal violet assay2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 16, Issue:10
Synthesis of indirubin-N'-glycosides and their anti-proliferative activity against human cancer cell lines.
AID1148515Toxicity in ip dosed mouse allografted with mouse B16 cells assessed as dose required for optimal activity administered qd from day 1 to day 9 post tumor implantation1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID625295Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) validation dataset; compound DILI positive/negative as observed in Pfizer data2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1298423Antiviral activity against VSV-G pseudotyped HIV-1 NL4-3 infected in human U373-MAGI cells assessed as Nef mutation at 260 uM incubated for 2 hrs prior to infection measured at 72 hrs post infection by illumina sequencing method (Rvb = 22.6%)2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 06-01, Volume: 24, Issue:11
Synergistic reduction of HIV-1 infectivity by 5-azacytidine and inhibitors of ribonucleotide reductase.
AID1133454Toxicity in mouse L1210 cells allografted CDF1 mouse assessed as change in body weight between day 1 and day 5 at 2.5 mg/kg, ip dosed on days 1 and 51978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 21, Issue:2
Isolation, characterization, and properties of a labile hydrolysis product of the antitumor nucleoside, 5-azacytidine.
AID408559Antiproliferative activity against human KYSE70 cells after 96 hrs by crystal violet assay2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 16, Issue:10
Synthesis of indirubin-N'-glycosides and their anti-proliferative activity against human cancer cell lines.
AID1148487Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in ip dosed mouse assessed as change in body weight at optimal dose administered qd on day 1, 5 and 9 post tumor implantation measured on day 5 relative to control1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1134743Toxicity in CDF1 mouse assessed as change in body weight at 0.78 mg/kg, ip measured on day 5 relative to control1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
Synthesis and antitumor activity of 5-azacytosine arabinoside.
AID721754Inhibition of human MATE1-mediated ASP+ uptake expressed in HEK293 cells after 1.5 mins by fluorescence assay2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 56, Issue:3
Discovery of potent, selective multidrug and toxin extrusion transporter 1 (MATE1, SLC47A1) inhibitors through prescription drug profiling and computational modeling.
AID1298294Reduction in dCTP level in human U373-MAGI cells at EC75 after 4 hrs by LC-MS/MS analysis relative to control2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 06-01, Volume: 24, Issue:11
Synergistic reduction of HIV-1 infectivity by 5-azacytidine and inhibitors of ribonucleotide reductase.
AID1148503Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in po dosed mouse assessed as dose required for minimal activity administered qd from day 1 to day 9 post tumor implantation1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID588213Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in non-rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID1133445Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in CDF1 mouse assessed as increase in life span at 20 mg/kg, ip relative to control1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 21, Issue:2
Isolation, characterization, and properties of a labile hydrolysis product of the antitumor nucleoside, 5-azacytidine.
AID521220Inhibition of neurosphere proliferation of mouse neural precursor cells by MTT assay2007Nature chemical biology, May, Volume: 3, Issue:5
Chemical genetics reveals a complex functional ground state of neural stem cells.
AID1298345Antiviral activity against VSV-G pseudotyped HIV-1 NL4-3 infected in human U373-MAGI cells assessed as increase in mutation frequency at 260 uM incubated for 2 hrs prior to infection measured at 72 hrs post infection by illumina sequencing method2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 06-01, Volume: 24, Issue:11
Synergistic reduction of HIV-1 infectivity by 5-azacytidine and inhibitors of ribonucleotide reductase.
AID1148507Toxicity in ip dosed mouse allografted with mouse L1210 cells assessed as dose required for optimal activity administered qd on day 1 post tumor implantation1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID355580Antiproliferative activity against human HT-29 cells at 1 ug after 48 hrs by two-layer agar-diffusion method
AID1079934Highest frequency of acute liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% AIGUE' in source]
AID1148518Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in ip dosed mouse assessed as dose required for maximal activity administered every 6 hrs on day 1, 5 and 9 post tumor implantation1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1134725Antitumor activity in mouse L1210 cells allografted in CDF1 mouse assessed as increase in life span at 6.25 mg/kg, ip administered as qd for 9 days relative to control1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
Synthesis and antitumor activity of 5-azacytosine arabinoside.
AID977599Inhibition of sodium fluorescein uptake in OATP1B1-transfected CHO cells at an equimolar substrate-inhibitor concentration of 10 uM2013Molecular pharmacology, Jun, Volume: 83, Issue:6
Structure-based identification of OATP1B1/3 inhibitors.
AID1079942Steatosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'STEAT' in source]
AID1054215Antiviral activity against HIV1 assessed as viral infection2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Nov-15, Volume: 21, Issue:22
5,6-Dihydro-5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine potentiates the anti-HIV-1 activity of ribonucleotide reductase inhibitors.
AID1148533Cytotoxicity against mouse L1210 cells assessed as cessation of growth in presence of uridine1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1148488Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in ip dosed mouse assessed as change in body weight at optimal dose administered qd on day 1 post tumor implantation measured on day 5 relative to control1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1134741Toxicity in CDF1 mouse assessed as change in body weight at 3.12 mg/kg, ip measured on day 5 relative to control1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
Synthesis and antitumor activity of 5-azacytosine arabinoside.
AID1288539Inhibition of UHRF1 in human MCF7 cells assessed as DNA global demethylation by measuring 5-methylcytosine level at 15 uM after 72 hrs by HPLC-MS/MS analysis (Rvb = 1.7 +/- 0.36%)2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, May-23, Volume: 114Tandem virtual screening targeting the SRA domain of UHRF1 identifies a novel chemical tool modulating DNA methylation.
AID1133458Toxicity in mouse L1210 cells allografted CDF1 mouse assessed as change in body weight between day 1 and day 9 at 5 mg/kg, ip dosed on days 1, 5 and 91978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 21, Issue:2
Isolation, characterization, and properties of a labile hydrolysis product of the antitumor nucleoside, 5-azacytidine.
AID1133447Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in CDF1 mouse assessed as increase in life span at 5 mg/kg, ip relative to control1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 21, Issue:2
Isolation, characterization, and properties of a labile hydrolysis product of the antitumor nucleoside, 5-azacytidine.
AID1148523Drug degradation in 1 N ammonium hydroxide solution assessed as l-beta-D-Ribofuranosyl-3-guanylurea level1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1148493Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in ip dosed mouse assessed as increase in life span at optimal dose administered qd from day 1 to day 9 post tumor implantation relative to control1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1133452Toxicity in mouse L1210 cells allografted CDF1 mouse assessed as change in body weight between day 1 and day 5 at 10 mg/kg, ip dosed on days 1 and 51978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 21, Issue:2
Isolation, characterization, and properties of a labile hydrolysis product of the antitumor nucleoside, 5-azacytidine.
AID1079949Proposed mechanism(s) of liver damage. [column 'MEC' in source]
AID355585Antiproliferative activity against mouse P388 cells at 0.1 ug after 48 hrs by two-layer agar-diffusion method
AID977602Inhibition of sodium fluorescein uptake in OATP1B3-transfected CHO cells at an equimolar substrate-inhibitor concentration of 10 uM2013Molecular pharmacology, Jun, Volume: 83, Issue:6
Structure-based identification of OATP1B1/3 inhibitors.
AID1323834Displacement of [3H]rosiglitazone from recombinant human C-terminal His-tagged MitoNEET cytosolic domain (32 to 108 residues) expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 by scintillation proximity assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 11-01, Volume: 26, Issue:21
Identification of small molecules that bind to the mitochondrial protein mitoNEET.
AID1133444Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in CDF1 mouse assessed as increase in life span at 40 mg/kg, ip relative to control1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 21, Issue:2
Isolation, characterization, and properties of a labile hydrolysis product of the antitumor nucleoside, 5-azacytidine.
AID355581Antiproliferative activity against human HT-29 cells at 0.1 ug after 48 hrs by two-layer agar-diffusion method
AID1148512Toxicity in po dosed mouse allografted with mouse L1210 cells assessed as dose required for optimal activity administered qd from day 1 to day 9 post tumor implantation1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1148508Toxicity in ip dosed mouse allografted with mouse L1210 cells assessed as dose required for optimal activity administered qd on day 1, 5 and 9 post tumor implantation1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1148491Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in ip dosed mouse assessed as increase in life span at optimal dose administered qd on day 1, 5 and 9 post tumor implantation relative to control1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1133471Toxicity in mouse L1210 cells allografted CDF1 mouse assessed as mortality at 2.5 to 40 mg/kg, ip1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 21, Issue:2
Isolation, characterization, and properties of a labile hydrolysis product of the antitumor nucleoside, 5-azacytidine.
AID1079945Animal toxicity known. [column 'TOXIC' in source]
AID1148504Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in ip dosed mouse assessed as dose required for minimal activity administered qd from day 1 to day 9 post intracerebral tumor implantation1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1133457Toxicity in mouse L1210 cells allografted CDF1 mouse assessed as change in body weight between day 1 and day 9 at 10 mg/kg, ip dosed on days 1, 5 and 91978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 21, Issue:2
Isolation, characterization, and properties of a labile hydrolysis product of the antitumor nucleoside, 5-azacytidine.
AID1133456Toxicity in mouse L1210 cells allografted CDF1 mouse assessed as change in body weight between day 1 and day 9 at 20 mg/kg, ip dosed on days 1, 5 and 91978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 21, Issue:2
Isolation, characterization, and properties of a labile hydrolysis product of the antitumor nucleoside, 5-azacytidine.
AID1148489Drug degradation in lactated Ringer's solution at 25 degC after 4.7 hrs1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1148521Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in ip dosed mouse assessed as dose required for maximal activity administered qd from day 1 to day 9 post intracerebral tumor implantation1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1437988Induction of apoptosis in human SKM1-S cells assessed as caspase 3 cleavage at 1 uM by Western blot method2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-23, Volume: 60, Issue:4
In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation of Fully Substituted (5-(3-Ethoxy-3-oxopropynyl)-4-(ethoxycarbonyl)-1,2,3-triazolyl-glycosides as Original Nucleoside Analogues to Circumvent Resistance in Myeloid Malignancies.
AID1437989Induction of apoptosis in human SKM1-R cells assessed as caspase 3 cleavage at 10 uM by Western blot method2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-23, Volume: 60, Issue:4
In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation of Fully Substituted (5-(3-Ethoxy-3-oxopropynyl)-4-(ethoxycarbonyl)-1,2,3-triazolyl-glycosides as Original Nucleoside Analogues to Circumvent Resistance in Myeloid Malignancies.
AID1079939Cirrhosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CIRRH' in source]
AID1079933Acute liver toxicity defined via clinical observations and clear clinical-chemistry results: serum ALT or AST activity > 6 N or serum alkaline phosphatases activity > 1.7 N. This category includes cytolytic, choleostatic and mixed liver toxicity. Value is
AID1148496Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in ip dosed mouse assessed as increase in life span at optimal dose administered qd from day 1 to day 9 post intracerebral tumor implantation relative to control1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID588212Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID1079943Malignant tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.MAL' in source]
AID1133451Toxicity in mouse L1210 cells allografted CDF1 mouse assessed as change in body weight between day 1 and day 5 at 20 mg/kg, ip dosed on days 1 and 51978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 21, Issue:2
Isolation, characterization, and properties of a labile hydrolysis product of the antitumor nucleoside, 5-azacytidine.
AID1148481Antitumor activity against mouse B16 cells allografted in ip dosed mouse assessed as change in body weight at optimal dose administered qd from day 1 to day 9 post tumor implantation measured on day 5 relative to control1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1298404Antiviral activity against VSV-G pseudotyped HIV-1 NL4-3 infected in human U373-MAGI cells assessed as increase in frequency of G to C transversion at 260 uM incubated for 2 hrs prior to infection measured at 72 hrs post infection by illumina sequencing m2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 06-01, Volume: 24, Issue:11
Synergistic reduction of HIV-1 infectivity by 5-azacytidine and inhibitors of ribonucleotide reductase.
AID1298405Antiviral activity against VSV-G pseudotyped HIV-1 NL4-3 infected in human U373-MAGI cells assessed as increase in frequency of C to G transversion at 260 uM incubated for 2 hrs prior to infection measured at 72 hrs post infection by illumina sequencing m2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 06-01, Volume: 24, Issue:11
Synergistic reduction of HIV-1 infectivity by 5-azacytidine and inhibitors of ribonucleotide reductase.
AID98149Compound was tested for its inhibitory activity against L1210 lymphoid leukemia1987Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 30, Issue:2
Synthesis and antitumor activity of fluorine-substituted 4-amino-2(1H)-pyridinones and their nucleosides. 3-Deazacytosines.
AID1148502Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in ip dosed mouse assessed as dose required for minimal activity administered qd from day 1 to day 9 post tumor implantation1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1148531Cytotoxicity against mouse L1210 cells assessed as cessation of growth1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1133453Toxicity in mouse L1210 cells allografted CDF1 mouse assessed as change in body weight between day 1 and day 5 at 5 mg/kg, ip dosed on days 1 and 51978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 21, Issue:2
Isolation, characterization, and properties of a labile hydrolysis product of the antitumor nucleoside, 5-azacytidine.
AID1148492Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in ip dosed mouse assessed as increase in life span at optimal dose administered every 6 hrs on day 1, 5 and 9 post tumor implantation relative to control1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1199273Half life in sc dosed patient with myelodysplastic syndrome2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-26, Volume: 58, Issue:6
Targeting DNA methylation with small molecules: what's next?
AID1133473Half life in rat1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 21, Issue:2
Isolation, characterization, and properties of a labile hydrolysis product of the antitumor nucleoside, 5-azacytidine.
AID1288542Inhibition of UHRF1 in human MCF7 cells assessed as reduction in global 5-methylcytosine level at 15 uM after 72 hrs by HPLC-MS/MS analysis relative to control2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, May-23, Volume: 114Tandem virtual screening targeting the SRA domain of UHRF1 identifies a novel chemical tool modulating DNA methylation.
AID1474166Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring severity class index2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID1298346Antiviral activity against VSV-G pseudotyped HIV-1 NL4-3 infected in human U373-MAGI cells assessed as G to C transversion at 260 uM incubated for 2 hrs prior to infection measured at 72 hrs post infection by illumina sequencing method relative to control2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 06-01, Volume: 24, Issue:11
Synergistic reduction of HIV-1 infectivity by 5-azacytidine and inhibitors of ribonucleotide reductase.
AID1437998Antiproliferative activity against human SKM1-R cells after 48 hrs by DAPI-staining-based flow cytometric method2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-23, Volume: 60, Issue:4
In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation of Fully Substituted (5-(3-Ethoxy-3-oxopropynyl)-4-(ethoxycarbonyl)-1,2,3-triazolyl-glycosides as Original Nucleoside Analogues to Circumvent Resistance in Myeloid Malignancies.
AID355584Antiproliferative activity against mouse P388 cells at 1 ug after 48 hrs by two-layer agar-diffusion method
AID1148505Antitumor activity against mouse P388 cells allografted in ip dosed mouse assessed as dose required for minimal activity administered qd from day 1 to day 9 post tumor implantation1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1134728Antitumor activity in mouse L1210 cells allografted in CDF1 mouse assessed as increase in life span at 1.56 mg/kg, ip administered as qd for 9 days relative to control1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 22, Issue:10
Synthesis and antitumor activity of 5-azacytosine arabinoside.
AID588209Literature-mined public compounds from Greene et al multi-species hepatotoxicity modelling dataset2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jul-19, Volume: 23, Issue:7
Developing structure-activity relationships for the prediction of hepatotoxicity.
AID1079947Comments (NB not yet translated). [column 'COMMENTAIRES' in source]
AID1464041Partition coefficient, log P of the compound2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-15, Volume: 25, Issue:20
Synthesis, pH dependent, plasma and enzymatic stability of bergenin prodrugs for potential use against rheumatoid arthritis.
AID1079935Cytolytic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is > 5 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CYTOL' in source]
AID1148509Toxicity in ip dosed mouse allografted with mouse L1210 cells assessed as dose required for optimal activity administered every 6 hrs on day 1, 5 and 9 post tumor implantation1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1464040Solubility in water2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-15, Volume: 25, Issue:20
Synthesis, pH dependent, plasma and enzymatic stability of bergenin prodrugs for potential use against rheumatoid arthritis.
AID1845917Inhibition of HIV-1 latency infected in human ACH-2 cells assessed as fold increase in HIV production by measuring p24 level incubated for 48 hrs in presence of BIX01294 by ELISA2021European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-05, Volume: 213HIV latency reversal agents: A potential path for functional cure?
AID408558Antiproliferative activity against human A427 cells after 96 hrs by crystal violet assay2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 16, Issue:10
Synthesis of indirubin-N'-glycosides and their anti-proliferative activity against human cancer cell lines.
AID1148510Toxicity in ip dosed mouse allografted with mouse L1210 cells assessed as dose required for optimal activity administered qd from day 1 to day 9 post tumor implantation1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID1079937Severe hepatitis, defined as possibly life-threatening liver failure or through clinical observations. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'MASS' in source]
AID1133446Antitumor activity against mouse L1210 cells allografted in CDF1 mouse assessed as increase in life span at 10 mg/kg, ip relative to control1978Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 21, Issue:2
Isolation, characterization, and properties of a labile hydrolysis product of the antitumor nucleoside, 5-azacytidine.
AID311935Partition coefficient, log P of the compound2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-24, Volume: 51, Issue:2
Identification of new functional inhibitors of acid sphingomyelinase using a structure-property-activity relation model.
AID1148479Half life of the compound at 25 degC at pH 7 by HPLC analysis1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID1745847CMV-Luciferase Counterscreen for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID1745846Firefly Luciferase Counterscreen for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID651635Viability Counterscreen for Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1745849Viability Counterscreen for CMV-Luciferase Assay of Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1745848Confirmatory qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1745850Viability Counterscreen for Confirmatory qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1159607Screen for inhibitors of RMI FANCM (MM2) intereaction2016Journal of biomolecular screening, Jul, Volume: 21, Issue:6
A High-Throughput Screening Strategy to Identify Protein-Protein Interaction Inhibitors That Block the Fanconi Anemia DNA Repair Pathway.
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID504749qHTS profiling for inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum proliferation2011Science (New York, N.Y.), Aug-05, Volume: 333, Issue:6043
Chemical genomic profiling for antimalarial therapies, response signatures, and molecular targets.
AID1347086qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Arenaviruses (LCMV): LCMV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347083qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: Viability assay - alamar blue signal for LASV Primary Screen2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID504812Inverse Agonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID588349qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression: Validation of Cytotoxic Assay
AID588378qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression: Validation
AID1347049Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr1) antagonism - Pilot screen2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID1347045Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr1) antagonism - Pilot counterscreen GloSensor control cell line2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID686947qHTS for small molecule inhibitors of Yes1 kinase: Primary Screen2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-01, Volume: 23, Issue:15
Identification of potent Yes1 kinase inhibitors using a library screening approach.
AID504810Antagonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID504836Inducers of the Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response (ERSR) in human glioma: Validation2002The Journal of biological chemistry, Apr-19, Volume: 277, Issue:16
Sustained ER Ca2+ depletion suppresses protein synthesis and induces activation-enhanced cell death in mast cells.
AID1508630Primary qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome: Secreted ER Calcium Modulated Protein (SERCaMP) assay2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID1347082qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: LASV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347050Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr2) antagonism - Pilot subtype selectivity assay2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID1347100qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347108qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347105qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347099qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347424RapidFire Mass Spectrometry qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347154Primary screen GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347095qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347093qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347101qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347425Rhodamine-PBP qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347097qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347102qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347106qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347091qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347094qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347092qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for A673 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347096qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347107qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347104qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347090qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347089qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347103qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347098qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347407qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Pharmaceutical Collection2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1347411qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Mechanism Interrogation Plate v5.0 (MIPE) Libary2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1745854NCATS anti-infectives library activity on HEK293 viability as a counter-qHTS vs the C. elegans viability qHTS2023Disease models & mechanisms, 03-01, Volume: 16, Issue:3
In vivo quantitative high-throughput screening for drug discovery and comparative toxicology.
AID1745855NCATS anti-infectives library activity on the primary C. elegans qHTS viability assay2023Disease models & mechanisms, 03-01, Volume: 16, Issue:3
In vivo quantitative high-throughput screening for drug discovery and comparative toxicology.
AID1347412qHTS assay to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: Counter screen cell viability and HiBit confirmation2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1802102Radioligand Binding Assay from Article 10.1021/acschembio.6b00357: \\Structure-Based Screening of Uncharted Chemical Space for Atypical Adenosine Receptor Agonists\\2016ACS chemical biology, 10-21, Volume: 11, Issue:10
Structure-Based Screening of Uncharted Chemical Space for Atypical Adenosine Receptor Agonists.
AID588519A screen for compounds that inhibit viral RNA polymerase binding and polymerization activities2011Antiviral research, Sep, Volume: 91, Issue:3
High-throughput screening identification of poliovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase inhibitors.
AID540299A screen for compounds that inhibit the MenB enzyme of Mycobacterium tuberculosis2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 20, Issue:21
Synthesis and SAR studies of 1,4-benzoxazine MenB inhibitors: novel antibacterial agents against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
AID1159550Human Phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (6PGD) Inhibitor Screening2015Nature cell biology, Nov, Volume: 17, Issue:11
6-Phosphogluconate dehydrogenase links oxidative PPP, lipogenesis and tumour growth by inhibiting LKB1-AMPK signalling.
AID1794808Fluorescence-based screening to identify small molecule inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum apicoplast DNA polymerase (Pf-apPOL).2014Journal of biomolecular screening, Jul, Volume: 19, Issue:6
A High-Throughput Assay to Identify Inhibitors of the Apicoplast DNA Polymerase from Plasmodium falciparum.
AID1794808Fluorescence-based screening to identify small molecule inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum apicoplast DNA polymerase (Pf-apPOL).
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (7,281)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-1990877 (12.05)18.7374
1990's589 (8.09)18.2507
2000's1730 (23.76)29.6817
2010's3296 (45.27)24.3611
2020's789 (10.84)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials479 (6.41%)5.53%
Reviews549 (7.35%)6.00%
Case Studies358 (4.79%)4.05%
Observational18 (0.24%)0.25%
Other6,070 (81.21%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (635)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Phase I-II Study to Assess Venetoclax + Azacitidine and Donor Lymphocyte Infusion in Patients With MDS or AML (Blasts < 30%) in Relapse After Allohematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT05226455]Phase 1/Phase 248 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-23Recruiting
Phase II Study of Venetoclax With Alternative Hypomethylating Agent for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Prior Hypomethylating Agent Failure: A University of California Hematologic Malignancies Consortium Protocol [NCT04905810]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-09Recruiting
Targeting TET2 Mutations in Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) With Azacitidine and Ascorbic Acid [NCT03397173]Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-16Completed
A Single Arm, Phase 2 Study Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of Maintenance Therapy With Hypomethylating Agent and Venetoclax After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With f High-risk Myeloid Malignancies. [NCT05841771]Phase 278 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-01Recruiting
Azacitidine in Combination With or Without All-trans Retinoic Acid in Newly Diagnosed Unfit Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Intermediate,High or Very High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) as Per IPSS-R Criteria [NCT05175508]Phase 2/Phase 3180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-01Recruiting
Randomized Phase-II Trial Evaluating Induction Therapy With Idarubicin and Etoposide Plus Sequential or Concurrent Azacitidine and Maintenance Therapy With Azacitidine [NCT01180322]Phase 2277 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
Blinded Cross-over Bioequivalence Trial of Luitpold Azacitidine Versus Vidaza® in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Myelofibrosis, Chronic Myeloid Leukemia or Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia [NCT01290302]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Completed
A Phase III, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Randomized Study Of Pracinostat In Combination With Azacitidine In Patients ≥18 Years With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia Unfit For Standard Induction Chemotherapy [NCT03151408]Phase 3406 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-23Terminated(stopped due to The IDMC recommended to stop the study prematurely due to a lack of efficacy.)
Pacritinib in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients With Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia [NCT06159491]Phase 1/Phase 226 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-02Not yet recruiting
A Phase 1 Study of Venetoclax in Combination With Azacitidine (VEN/AZA) Followed by Donor Lymphocyte Infusion (DLI) for Patients With Very High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant (HCT) [NCT06158100]Phase 125 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-02-28Not yet recruiting
A Phase 1/2, Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Dose Ranging and Expansion Study of the Combination of Gilteritinib, Venetoclax and Azacitidine in Patients With Newly Diagnosed FLT3 Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Not Eligible for Intensive Inductio [NCT05520567]Phase 1/Phase 270 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-27Recruiting
A Phase 1b Study of JNJ-75276617 in Combination With AML-Directed Therapies for Participants With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Harboring KMT2A or NPM1 Alterations [NCT05453903]Phase 1150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-04Recruiting
A Phase 2 Study of Belinostat and SGI-110 (Guadecitabine) or ASTX727 for the Treatment of Unresectable and Metastatic Conventional Chondrosarcoma [NCT04340843]Phase 232 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-08Suspended(stopped due to Other - Completed stage 1 accrual)
Phase I Study of APR-246 in Combination With Venetoclax and Azacitidine in TP53-Mutant Myeloid Malignancies [NCT04214860]Phase 151 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-12-13Completed
An Open-Label Phase II Study of Relatlimab (BMS-986016) With Nivolumab (BMS-936558) in Combination With 5-Azacytidine for the Treatment of Patients With Refractory/Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Newly Diagnosed Older Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients [NCT04913922]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-05Recruiting
An Open Label, Single Arm, Single-Center Exploratory Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Selinexor and HAAG +/- HMA in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Leukemia (AML) Patients [NCT05805072]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-01Not yet recruiting
BRE-04: Window of Opportunity Trial of Preoperative Low Dose Azacitidine in High-Risk Early Stage Breast Cancer [NCT04891068]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-10Recruiting
A Phase I Study of Azacitidine Combined With Mitoxantrone and Etoposide (A-NOVE) Chemotherapy for Patients' Age ≥ 60 With Poor Prognosis Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [NCT01260714]Phase 113 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Inadequate accrual rate)
Efficacy and Safety of PD-1 Inhibitor, Azacitidine and Low-dose DLI in AML Relapse After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT05772273]43 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-15Recruiting
Phase II Multicentric Trial Maintenance Therapy With 6 Monthly Revlimid® Cycles Alternated With 6 Monthly Vidaza® Cycles in First CR After Induction LIA Chemotherapy for Elderly Fit Patients With Poor Prognosis Acute Myeloid Leukemia. [NCT01301820]Phase 2120 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group, Phase 3 Trial of Subcutaneous Azacitidine Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Conventional Care Regimens Plus Best Supportive Care for the Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) [NCT00071799]Phase 3358 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-11-01Completed
A Multicentric Phase 2 Study of Venetoclax and Azacitidine for the Management of Molecular Relapse/Progression in Adult NPM1-MUTATED Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT04867928]Phase 235 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-01Recruiting
PHASE 1B/PHASE 3 MULTICENTER STUDY OF AVELUMAB (MSB0010718C) IN COMBINATION REGIMENS THAT INCLUDE AN IMMUNE AGONIST, EPIGENETIC MODULATOR, CD20 ANTAGONIST AND/OR CONVENTIONAL CHEMOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY DIFFUSE LARGE B-CELL LYMPHO [NCT02951156]Phase 329 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-16Terminated(stopped due to Study was terminated due to closure of study arms following futility analysis and difficulty in enrolling participants due to evolving treatment landscape)
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group Study of a Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) Regimen or a Sequential Azacitidine (Vidaza®) Plus Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) Regimen Versus an Azacitidine (Vidaza®) Regimen for Therapy of Older Subjects Wi [NCT01358734]Phase 288 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-27Completed
OPEN LABEL PHASE 2 STUDY ON THE EFFICACY AND TOLERANCE OF A COMBINATION OF PONATINIB AND 5-AZACITIDINE IN CHRONIC MYELOGENOUS LEUKAEMIA IN ACCELERATED PHASE OR IN MYELOID BLAST CRISIS - PONAZA TRIAL [NCT03895671]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-06-19Recruiting
A Phase I and Expansion Cohort Study of Venetoclax in Combination With Chemotherapy in Pediatric Patients With Refractory or Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT03194932]Phase 162 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-11Completed
Plasma Dosage of Venetoclax in the Follow-up of Acute Myeloid Leukemias Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy in the First Line of Treatment and Treated With Azacitidine + Venetoclax. Pilot Study VENETACIBLE [NCT06030089]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-15Not yet recruiting
An Open-Label, Phase I, Dose-Escalation Study Evaluating the Safety and Tolerability of DCLL9718S in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or DCLL9718S in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients With Previously Untreated AML U [NCT03298516]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-15Completed
Pilot Open-label Trial of Nivolumab Combined With Chemotherapy in Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes. [NCT03259516]Phase 1/Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-25Terminated(stopped due to Slow recruitment rate)
Treatment of Relapsed Acute Leukemia After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: Disease Stabilization Through Chemotherapy, Immunomodulatory Treatment and Immunotherapy [NCT01369368]Phase 1/Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-08-31Recruiting
A Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Fludarabine/Cytarabine/Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin With or Without Venetoclax in Children With Relapsed AML [NCT05183035]Phase 398 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-01Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase III Multi-center Study of Azacitidine With or Without MBG453 for the Treatment of Patients With Intermediate, High or Very High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) as Per IPSS-R, or Chronic Myelomonocyt [NCT04266301]Phase 3530 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-06-08Active, not recruiting
A PHASE II STUDY OF Azacitidine Plus Deferasirox (ICL670) in Higher Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) [NCT02038816]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Terminated(stopped due to accrual too slow, insufficient patients)
Azacytidine Combined With Chidamide in the Treatment of Relapsed and Refractory Angioimmunoblastic T-cell Lymphoma: a Multicenter Single Arm Phase II Study [NCT05179213]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-01Not yet recruiting
A Phase I/II Safety and Clinical Activity Study of Combination Azacitidine and Avelumab in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) [NCT03699384]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-03Withdrawn(stopped due to Study sponsor discontinued support)
Phase 1 Study of SL-401 in Combination With Azacitidine and Venetoclax in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and in Treatment-Naive Subjects With AML Not Eligible for Standard Induction and in Subjects With Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cel [NCT03113643]Phase 172 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-06-26Recruiting
A Phase II Trial of the DNA Methyl Transferase Inhibitor, SGI-110 (Guadecitabine), In Children And Adults With Wild Type GIST, Pheochromocytoma And Paraganglioma Associated With Succinate Dehydrogenase Deficiency And HLRCC-Associated Kidney Cancer [NCT03165721]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-16Terminated(stopped due to Study closed to enrollment due to low accrual.)
Multicentre, Open-label, Randomized Phase II Study of Vidaza (Azacitidine) Versus Support Treatment in Patients With Low Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (Low and Intermediate-1 International Prognostic Scoring System(IPSS )) Without the 5q Deletion and Tran [NCT01338337]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
Concomitant Omacetaxine Mepesuccinate and Azacitidine for Patients With Previously Untreated High Grade Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT03564873]Phase 1/Phase 251 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-09-17Recruiting
A Phase I-II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Idarubicin Combined to Azacitidine in Int-2 or High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT01305135]Phase 1/Phase 241 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-30Completed
Azacitidine and Chimerism in MDS or AML Patients After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant [NCT03850418]Phase 243 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-01Recruiting
A Phase Ib/II Study of APG-115 Alone or in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients With Relapse/Refractory AML, CMML or MDS [NCT04358393]Phase 1/Phase 269 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-04Recruiting
A Feasibility Trial of MLN4924 (Pevonedistat, TAK 924) Given in Combination With Azacitidine, Fludarabine, and Cytarabine, in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT03813147]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-17Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Phase II/III Study of Azacitidine in Combination With Lenalidomide (NSC-703813) vs. Azacitidine Alone vs. Azacitidine in Combination With Vorinostat (NSC-701852) for Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leuke [NCT01522976]Phase 2282 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-01Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Double-blind Phase 3 Study of Vadastuximab Talirine (SGN-CD33A) Versus Placebo in Combination With Azacitidine or Decitabine in the Treatment of Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [NCT02785900]Phase 3240 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Due to safety; specifically a higher rate of deaths, including fatal infections, in the SGN33A arm versus the control arm)
Clinical Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Anti-PD-1 Monoclonal Antibody Combined Lenalidomide and Azacitidine in Relapsed/Refractory Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma [NCT05182957]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-14Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Tosedostat in Combination With Either Cytarabine or Decitabine in Newly Diagnosed AML or High-Risk MDS [NCT01567059]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Phase I/II Dose Finding and Efficacy Study of Venetoclax, CC-486, and Obinutuzumab in Minimally-Pretreated Follicular Lymphoma [NCT04722601]Phase 1/Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-09-01Completed
Phase II Trial of APR-246 in Combination With Azacitidine as Maintenance Therapy for TP53 Mutated AML or MDS Following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant [NCT03931291]Phase 233 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-16Completed
A Phase 1b/2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of APR-246 in Combination With Azacitidine for the Treatment of Mutation TP53 (TP53) Mutant Myeloid Neoplasms [NCT03588078]Phase 1/Phase 253 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-15Active, not recruiting
Chidamide Plus Azacitidine Epigenetic Repression for the Treatment of Previously Untreated Nodal T-follicular Helper (TFH) Cell Lymphoma [NCT05958719]Phase 237 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-02Recruiting
Phase I / II, Open Label, Dose Escalation Part (Phase I) Followed by Non-comparative Expansion Part (Phase II), Multi-centre Study, Evaluating Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of S65487, a Bcl2 Inhibitor Combined With Azacitidine in Adult Patients Wi [NCT04742101]Phase 1/Phase 289 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-10Recruiting
Phase I/II, International, Multicentre, Open-label, Non-randomised, Non-comparative, Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability and Clinical Activity of Intravenously Administered S64315, a Selective Mcl-1 Inhibitor, in Combination With Azacitidine in Pati [NCT04629443]Phase 1/Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-02-17Active, not recruiting
A Multi-Center Relative Bioavailability Study of Azacitidine 75 mg/m2 Subcutaneous Injection In Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patients Under Fasting Conditions [NCT01152346]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
A Phase I Study of Epigenetic Immunomodulation Through the Use of Azacitidine, Lenalidomide, and Grifola Frondosa in Patients With Advanced Malignancy [NCT01200004]Phase 11 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Slow Accrual.)
A Phase II Study of Pevonedistat (MLN4924, TAK924) and Azacitidine as Maintenance Therapy After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Non-Remission Acute Myelogenous Leukemia [NCT03709576]Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-07-18Terminated(stopped due to Funding pulled)
A Multicenter, Phase 2 Study of Maintenance Azacitidine in Elderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Complete Remission After Induction Chemotherapy [NCT00387647]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
Phase II Study for the Use of Vidaza™ to Restore Responsiveness of Patients' Prostate Cancers to Hormonal Therapy [NCT00384839]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
Therapy of Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) With Azacitidine Given in Combination With Etanercept: A Phase I/II Study. [NCT00118287]Phase 1/Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
A Phase II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide Combined to Azacitidine in Intermediate-2 or High Risk MDS With Del 5q [NCT01088373]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-25Completed
HEC73543 Versus Salvage Chemotherapy in Relapsed or Refractory FLT3-ITD Acute Myeloid Leukemia: a Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Phase 3 Trial [NCT05586074]Phase 3324 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-03Recruiting
Phase II Open-Label, Single-Center Study Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of Pembrolizumab Following Induction With the Hypomethylating Agent Azacitidine in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer After Failure of First-Line Therapy [NCT03264404]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-01Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study With a Safety Run-in Phase Evaluating Vosaroxin With Azacitidine in Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Intermediate/Adverse Genetic Risk or Myelodysplastic Syndrome With Excess Blasts-2 (MDS-EB-2) - AMLSG 24-15 [NCT03338348]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-19Completed
A Phase Ib/II Open Label Dose Confirmation, Proof of Concept Study of Siremadlin in Combination With Venetoclax Plus Azacitidine in Unfit Adult AML Participants Who Responded Sub-optimally to First-line Venetoclax Plus Azacitidine Treatment and in Partici [NCT05155709]Phase 1/Phase 256 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-17Recruiting
A Randomized, Open-Label Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Galinpepimut-S (GPS) Maintenance Monotherapy Compared to Investigator's Choice of Best Available Therapy in Subjects With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Have Achieved Complete Remission After Second [NCT04229979]Phase 3140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-08Recruiting
A Multicenter Clinical Study of Microtransplantation Combined With Azacytidine to Improve the Efficacy of Elderly Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT05262465]300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-01Recruiting
A Phase I Study of Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of HMPL-523 With Azacitidine in Elderly Patients With Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT03483948]Phase 17 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-09Terminated(stopped due to Slow Enrollment)
A Phase II Trial of Azacitidine (NSC-102816) Plus Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (NSC-720568) as Induction and Post-Remission Therapy in Patients of Age 60 and Older With Previously Untreated Non-M3 Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT00658814]Phase 2133 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-01Active, not recruiting
Retrospective, Observational, Monocentric Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of an Hypomethylating Agent in Combination With Venetoclax for Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy [NCT04454580]15 participants (Anticipated)Observational2020-08-01Recruiting
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety and Activity of Azacitidine and to Compare Azacitidine to Historical Controls in Pediatric Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT02447666]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-15Completed
The Efficacy and Safety of Azacytidine Combined With HAG Regimen Versus Azacytidine for Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Myeloid Malignancy: a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03873311]Phase 4114 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-09-01Recruiting
A Phase IB/II Study of Epacadostat (INCB024360) in Combination With Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) and Azacitidine in Subjects With Chemo-refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT03182894]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Study will not be conducted due to changes related to the investigational agent.)
A Phase 1b Dose Escalation Study Evaluating the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Venetoclax in Combination With Azacitidine in Subjects With Treatment-Naïve Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) [NCT02942290]Phase 1129 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-12Active, not recruiting
Randomized, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study of Azacytidine (AZA) + Venetoclax as Maintenance Therapy in Patients With AML in Remissionin Younger Adults With Favorable-risk AML in First Remission After Conventional Chemotherapy [NCT05404906]Phase 2/Phase 3124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-25Recruiting
To Evaluate Safety and Efficiency of AZA Combined With Chidamide as Maintenance Therapy in High-risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation:A Multicenter, Single-arm Study [NCT05270200]Phase 1/Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-01Recruiting
Prospective, Single-center, Single-arm, Open-label Study of Obinutuzumab, Zanubrutinib and Lenalidomide Sequential CD19/CD22 CAR-T in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT05797948]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-01Enrolling by invitation
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sintilimab (IBI308) in Combination With Chidamide and Azacitidine in the Refractory or Relapsed PTCL: A Phase 2, Single-center, Single-arm, Open Label Trial [NCT04052659]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-04-15Not yet recruiting
A Phase I/II Study of Azacitidine in Haploidentical Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation [NCT02750254]Phase 15 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-27Terminated(stopped due to Toxicity. Only enrolled patients in phase I portion of trial.)
An Open-label, Phase I Study to Assess the Safety of NKR-2 Treatment Administered Concurrently With 5-azacytidine in Treatment-naïve Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patients Not Candidates for Intensive Therapy [NCT03612739]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-12-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Sponsor decision)
A Phase 1, Open-label, Multicenter Trial of Oral Azacitidine (CC-486) Plus R-CHOP in Subjects With High Risk (IPI 3 or More) Previously Untreated Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma or Grade 3B Follicular Lymphoma. [NCT02343536]Phase 159 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-29Completed
Risk Stratified Treatment for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Juvenile Myelomonocytic Leukemia: A Phase I/II Non-randomized Study of Trametinib and Azacitidine With or Without Chemotherapy (IND #164058) [NCT05849662]Phase 1/Phase 258 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-30Not yet recruiting
A Multicentric Phase I/II Study of Jaktinib Hydrochloride Tablets in Combination With Azacitidine for Injection in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes(MDS) With Myelofibrosis(MF) or MDS/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms With MF [NCT04866056]Phase 1/Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Corporate policy adjustments)
A Window Trial of 5-Azacytidine or Nivolumab or Combination Nivolumab Plus 5-Azacytidine in Resectable HPV-Associated Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer [NCT05317000]Early Phase 150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-23Recruiting
A Phase 1b/2, Open-Label, Dose Finding, and Expansion Study of the Bcl-2 Inhibitor BGB-11417 in Patients With Myeloid Malignancies [NCT04771130]Phase 1/Phase 2260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-24Recruiting
A Phase Ib/II Study to Evaluate the Safety, Feasibility and Efficacy of Nivolumab or Nivolumab in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients With Recurrent, Resectable Osteosarcoma [NCT03628209]Phase 1/Phase 251 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-03Recruiting
A Phase 1b/2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of APR-246 in Combination With Azacitidine for the Treatment of TP53 Mutant Myeloid Neoplasms [NCT03072043]Phase 1/Phase 255 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-18Completed
Maintenance Therapy With Azacitidine and Valproic Acid After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant in Patients With High-Risk Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) or Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)(Version 1_06 Jan 2012) [NCT02124174]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-01-31Recruiting
A Phase I/II Trial of AK117 (Anti-CD47) in Patients With Higher-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT04900350]Phase 1/Phase 2190 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-18Recruiting
Phase-II Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Toxicity of 5-Azacitidine in Addition to Standard DLI for the Treatment of Patients With AML or MDS Relapsing After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT00795548]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
A Phase 1/2 Study Exploring the Safety, Tolerability, Effect on the Tumor Microenvironment, and Efficacy of Azacitidine in Combination With Pembrolizumab and Epacadostat in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors and Previously Treated Stage IIIB or Stage IV [NCT02959437]Phase 1/Phase 270 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-27Terminated(stopped due to Study terminated by Sponsor)
Induction Chemotherapy Sequential Sintilimab Combined With Dual Epigenetic Drugs (Chidamide and Azacitidine) in ENKTL-HLH: A Single-arm, Multi-center, Phase II, Exploratory Clinical Study [NCT05008666]Phase 237 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-01Not yet recruiting
Open-label, Phase 2 Study Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of the Addition of Oral-azacitidine to Salvage Treatment by Gilteritinib in Subjects ≥18 Years of Age With Relapsed/Refractory FLT3-mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT06022003]Phase 233 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-15Not yet recruiting
A Randomized, Open Label Phase 3 Study Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of Venetoclax in Combination With Azacitidine After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Subjects With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) (VIALE-T) [NCT04161885]Phase 3424 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-02-26Recruiting
Targeted Therapy With the IDH2-Inhibitor Enasidenib (AG221) for High-Risk IDH2-Mutant Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT03383575]Phase 263 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-01-17Recruiting
A Phase Ib/II Study of Guadecitabine (SGI-110) Plus Nivolumab in Refractory CIMP+ Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT03576963]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-30Withdrawn(stopped due to No funding)
A Phase I/II, Open-label, 2 Arm Study to Investigate the Safety, Clinical Activity, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of GSK2879552 Administered Alone or in Combination With Azacitidine, in Adult Subjects With IPSS-R High and Very High Risk Myelodyspl [NCT02929498]Phase 1/Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-31Terminated(stopped due to The risk benefit in the study population does not favor continuation of the study)
Phase II Study of Daratumumab in Combination With Azacitidine and Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients Previously Treated With Daratumumab [NCT04407442]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Slow enrollment and change in sponsor direction)
A Phase 1/2 Study of INCB053914 in Subjects With Advanced Malignancies [NCT02587598]Phase 1/Phase 297 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-29Terminated
Phase I Study of MEK Inhibitor Selumetinib in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients With Higher Risk Chronic Myeloid Neoplasia: MDS, MDS/MPNs, and Myelofibrosis [NCT03326310]Phase 118 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-09-04Recruiting
Phase I/II Evaluation of Aerosolized Azacytidine as Epigenetic Priming for Bintrafusp Alfa-Mediated Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Patients With Unresectable Pulmonary Metastases From Sarcomas, Germ Cell Tumors, or Epithelial Malignancies [NCT04648826]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-12-14Withdrawn(stopped due to Due to notification from EMD Serono, for Bintrafusp alfa (M7824) regarding an observed increase in the frequently of early progression and death.)
A Phase 1 Study of Romidepsin, CC-486 (5-azacitidine), Dexamethasone, and Lenalidomide (RAdR) for Relapsed/Refractory T-cell Malignancies [NCT04447027]Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-17Recruiting
Phase I Trial of 5-Azacitidine Plus Gemcitabine in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer [NCT01167816]Phase 19 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Terminated(stopped due to The study was terminated as the Prinicipal Investigator left the site- all previous subjects enrolled are deceased)
A Randomized Phase II Trial of MLN4924 (Pevonedistat) With Azacitidine Versus Azacitidine in Adult Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT03745352]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-20Withdrawn(stopped due to Inadequate accrual rate)
A Phase 2, Open-label Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of MGCD0103 Administered in Combination With Azacitidine (Vidaza®) to Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, and to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of Different F [NCT00543582]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Celgene terminated its collaboration agreement with MethylGene for the development of MGCD0103. All Celgene-sponsored trials with MGCD0103 will be closed.)
Phase I Study of Decitabine (Dacogen) and Selinexor (KPT-330) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT02093403]Phase 125 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Completed
Clinical Study of Azacitidine Combined With Ruxolitinib in the Treatment of Higher-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes∕Myeloproliferative Neoplasms [NCT05817955]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-01Recruiting
A Phase 2, Randomized, Open-label Study of Cusatuzumab in Combination With Azacitidine Compared With Azacitidine Alone in Patients With Higher-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) and Who Are Not Candidates for Hem [NCT04264806]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-05-06Withdrawn(stopped due to The cusatuzumab MDS strategy is under revision)
VIDAZA® Drug Use Examination [NCT02137629]511 participants (Actual)Observational2010-12-27Completed
A Phase Ib/II Trial of AK117 (Anti-CD47 Antibody) in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT04980885]Phase 1/Phase 2160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-13Recruiting
Prospective Randomized Study on the Feasibility of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Higher-risk-myelodysplastic Syndromes, Performed Upfront or Preceded by Azacitidine or Conventional Chemotherapy According to the BM-blast Proportion [NCT04184505]Phase 3274 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-27Recruiting
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study Comparing Three Alternative Dosing Regimens of Subcutaneous Azacitidine Plus Best Supportive Care for the Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT00102687]Phase 2151 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-01Completed
Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Azacitidine (Vidaza) and Bortezomib (Velcade) in T-Cell Lymphoma [NCT01129180]Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
Phase II Study of 5-azacytidine Maintenance After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for High-risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) [NCT02204020]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Lack of interest with investigators - no subjects enrolled)
A Phase 1, Open-label, Multicenter, Randomized, 2-Period, Crossover Study to Evaluate the Bioequivalence and Food Effect Bioavailability of CC-486 (Oral Azacitidine) Tablets in Adult Cancer Subjects [NCT02223052]Phase 189 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-27Completed
A Phase 1-2, Dose Escalation, Multicenter Study of Two Subcutaneous Regimens of SGI-110, a DNA Hypomethylating Agent, in Subjects With Intermediate or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) or Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) [NCT01261312]Phase 1/Phase 2401 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
Single-arm, Open Label, Phase II Study of MBG453 (Sabatolimab) Added to FDA Approved Hypomethylating Agents of Investigator's Choice (IV/SC/Oral) for Patients With Intermediate, High or Very High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) as Per IPSS-R Criteria [NCT04878432]Phase 290 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-17Recruiting
A Two-Stage, Open-Label Phase 2 Study of Pracinostat and Azacitidine in Patients With IPSS-R High and Very High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes Previously Untreated With Hypomethylating Agents [NCT03151304]Phase 264 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-01Terminated(stopped due to Sponsor's decision as at the completion of the primary analysis, the data were considered mature)
Phase 1b/2 Clinical Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Profiles of CFI-400945 as a Single Agent or in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients With AML, MDS or CMML [NCT04730258]Phase 1/Phase 272 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-04-16Recruiting
A Phase 1 Study of Adding Venetoclax to a Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimen and to Maintenance in Combination With a Hypomethylating Agent After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Patients With High Risk AML, MDS, and MDS/MPN Overlap S [NCT03613532]Phase 178 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-10-24Recruiting
Randomized Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and the Safety of Oral Azacitidine (CC-486) Compared to Investigator's Choice Therapy in Patient With Relapsed or Refractory Angioimmunoblastic T Cell Lymphoma [NCT03593018]Phase 386 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-09Active, not recruiting
An Open-Label Phase 1a/1b Dose Escalation and Expansion Cohort Study of SL-172154 (SIRPα-Fc-CD40L) in Combination With Azacitidine or With Azacitidine and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Subjects With Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) or Acute My [NCT05275439]Phase 1107 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-17Recruiting
A Phase II Trial of Pevonedistat and Azacitidine in MDS or MDS/MPN Patients Who Fail Primary Therapy With DNA Methyl Transferase Inhibitors [NCT03238248]Phase 271 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-07Active, not recruiting
A Phase 1/1b Dose Escalation, Multicenter, Open-label, Safety, Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study of FT-1101 as a Single Agent and in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Hematologic Malignancies [NCT02543879]Phase 194 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
A Phase Ib/II Study Assessing the BET-bromodomain (BRD) Inhibitor OTX015 in Combination With Azacitidine (AZA) or AZA Single Agent in Patients With Newly-diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Not Candidate for Standard Intensive Induction Therapy (SIIT) [NCT02303782]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Withdrawn
Phase I Study of Decitabine and Haplo-identical Natural Killer Cells in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [NCT02316964]Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-21Completed
an Single Center,Single Arm, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of PD-1 Inhibitor Combined With Azacytidine and HAG Regimen for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia. [NCT04722952]Phase 330 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-01Recruiting
A Phase 1 Study Evaluating the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of ABT-348 as Monotherapy and in Combination With Azacitidine in Subjects With Advanced Hematologic Malignancies [NCT01110473]Phase 152 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Unrelated Umbilical Cord Blood Microtransplantation in Patients With Acute Myelocytic Leukemia [NCT06105658]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-31Recruiting
A Phase I Study of Duvelisib in Combination With BMS-986345 in Lymphoid Malignancy [NCT05065866]Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-18Recruiting
Phase I/II Study of Azacitidine in Combination With Quizartinib for Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms With FLT3 or CBL Mutations [NCT04493138]Phase 1/Phase 258 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-21Recruiting
A Multi-center, Phase II, Single-arm Clinical Study of Venetoclax Combined With Azacytiside in the Treatment of Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms in Adults [NCT05282719]Phase 233 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-30Enrolling by invitation
A Phase 2 Study of Azacitidine in Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) [NCT01235117]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
A Phase I/II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of an Intensified Schedule of Azacitidine (Vidaza®) in Intermediate-2 and High Risk MDS Patients [NCT01305460]Phase 1/Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-05Completed
A PHASE 1 DOSE ESCALATION STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS OF INTRAVENOUS PF-06747143, ADMINISTERED AS SINGLE AGENT OR IN COMBINATION WITH STANDARD CHEMOTHERAPY IN ADULT PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA [NCT02954653]Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-28Terminated(stopped due to The study was terminated due to a change in sponsor prioritization.)
A Phase II Study of Epigenetic Priming Using Azacitidine Followed by Rituximab-GDP Immunochemotherapy in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma [NCT03719989]Phase 227 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-12-01Not yet recruiting
A Phase I/II Study to Investigate the Safety and Clinical Activity of GSK3326595 and Other Agents in Participants With Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukaemia [NCT03614728]Phase 1/Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-16Terminated(stopped due to Trial terminated due to internal review of clinical data in context of indication under investigation)
Randomized Phase II Trial Seeking the Most Promising Drug Association With Azacitidine- in Higher Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT01342692]Phase 2320 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-06-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase 1b Trial of Magrolimab Monotherapy or Magrolimab in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients With Hematological Malignancies [NCT03248479]Phase 1258 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-08Terminated(stopped due to This study has been discontinued due to futility based on the results of a planned analysis of the ENHANCE trial.)
A Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-Group Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of DACOGEN (Decitabine) for Injection and VIDAZA (Azacitidine) for Injection In Subjects With Intermediate or High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) [NCT01011283]Phase 426 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Terminated(stopped due to The study was stopped due to insufficient enrollment.)
A Phase I Study of Uproleselan Combined With Azacitidine and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Older or Unfit Patients With Treatment Naive Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT04964505]Phase 125 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-02Recruiting
Phase II Study of 5-azacytidine and Lintuzumab in Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) [NCT00997243]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Drug no longer being supplied by sponsor)
A Combination of PKC412 and 5-Azacytidine for the Treatment of Patients With Refractory or Relapsed Acute Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) [NCT01202877]Phase 1/Phase 254 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
Phase I/II Study of Azacitidine and CAPOX (Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin) in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Enriched for Hypermethylation of CpG Promoter Islands [NCT01193517]Phase 1/Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
Phase I/II Study of the Combination of 5-azacitidine With Lenalidomide in Patients With High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) [NCT01038635]Phase 1/Phase 294 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
A Phase 2, Monocentric, Pilot Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of CC 486 (Oral Azacitidine) Plus Best Supportive Care as Maintenance of Response to sc Azacitidine in IPSS Higher Risk Elderly MDS Patients [NCT04806906]Phase 210 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-24Recruiting
Venetoclax Based Regimen for the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory T-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [NCT05149378]Phase 225 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-01Recruiting
A Master Protocol for Biomarker-Based Treatment of AML (The Beat AML Trial) [NCT03013998]Phase 1/Phase 22,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-11-30Recruiting
Phase I/II, Dose-Escalation Study of Ponatinib, a FLT3 Inhibitor, With and Without Combination of 5-Azacytidine, in Patients With FLT3-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [NCT02829840]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Withdrawn
Single Arm,Open Label,Phase I Clinical Study of Venetoclax Combined With CACAG Regimen in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT05659992]Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-10Recruiting
Azacitidine and Venetoclax (ABT-199) as Induction Therapy With Venetoclax Maintenance in Previously Untreated Elderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [NCT03466294]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-05-15Active, not recruiting
An Open-label, Multicenter, Phase 1a/1b Study of IGM-8444 as a Single Agent and in Combination in Subjects With Relapsed, Refractory, or Newly Diagnosed Cancers [NCT04553692]Phase 1430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-23Recruiting
A Phase 1 Study of SEA-CD70 in Myeloid Malignancies [NCT04227847]Phase 1140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-08-07Recruiting
A Phase 2, Open-Label, Single-Arm Rollover Study to Evaluate Long-Term Safety in Subjects Who Participated in Other Celgene Sponsored CC-486 (Oral Azacitidine) Clinical Trials in Hematological Disorders [NCT02494258]Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-22Active, not recruiting
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Azacitidine With or Without Birinapant With a Single Arm Open-Label Run-In Phase in Subjects With Higher Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia [NCT02147873]Phase 2118 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Study terminated due to lack of efficacy)
A Phase Ib Study to Investigate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of APG-115 as a Single Agent or in Combination With Azacitidine or Cytarabine in Patients With Relapse/Refractory AML and Relapsed/Progressed High/Very High Risk MDS [NCT04275518]Phase 1102 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-06Recruiting
A Randomized, run-in, Multi-center, Phase II Study of Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab and Guadecitabine or Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab in Melanoma and NSCLC Patients Resistant to Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 (NIBIT-ML1) [NCT04250246]Phase 2184 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-03-31Not yet recruiting
A Phase 1b Study Evaluating the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Venetoclax as a Single-Agent and in Combination With Azacitidine in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT02966782]Phase 170 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-07Completed
A Randomized Phase II Trial to Simultaneously Evaluate Two Schedules of the Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Entinostat in Combination With 5-Azacytidine (5AC, NSC 102816) in Elderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [NCT01305499]Phase 252 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-01Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of 5-Azacitidine (5AC) in Combination With Sargramostim (GM-CSF) as Maintenance Treatment, After Definitive Therapy With Either Stem Cell Transplant (SCT) or Cytarabine-based Chemotherapy, in Patients With Poor-risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT01700673]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
A Phase 1b/2 Study of TP-0903 in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia and FLT3 Mutations [NCT04518345]Early Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-05Completed
Evaluating in Vivo AZA Incorporation in Mononuclear Cells Following Vidaza or CC486 [NCT03493646]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-06-18Active, not recruiting
A Phase 1 Study of the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Escalating Oral Doses of the Glutaminase Inhibitor CB-839 in Patients With Relapsed and/or Treatment-Refractory Leukemia [NCT02071927]Phase 143 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Completed
A Pilot Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Biological Activity of 5-azacitidine on ER and PR Expression in Triple Negative Invasive Breast Cancer [NCT01292083]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to No accrual last 2 years)
Phase II Study of 5-Azacytidine (AZA) + Venetoclax as Maintenance Therapy in Patients With AML in Remission [NCT04062266]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-09-13Recruiting
"A Randomized Phase II/III Trial of Novel Therapeutics Versus Azacitidine in Newly Diagnosed Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS), Age 60 or Older LEAP: Less-Intense AML Platform Trial" [NCT03092674]Phase 2/Phase 378 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-02Active, not recruiting
Precision Therapy Versus Standard Therapy in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome in Elderly [NCT05025098]Phase 236 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-22Recruiting
Phase I/Ib Study of Azacitidine or Decitabine With Hedgehog Pathway Inhibition in Myeloid Malignancies [NCT02129101]Phase 163 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label, Phase 2 Study, With a Safety Run-in Part to Evaluate Safety, Pharmacodynamics and Efficacy of Azacitidine Compared to No Anticancer Treatment in Children and Young Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Molecular Rela [NCT02450877]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-12Completed
A Multicenter, Phase 3 Study of Venetoclax and Oral Azacitidine Versus Oral Azacitidine as Maintenance Therapy for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Remission After Conventional Chemotherapy (VIALE-M) [NCT04102020]Phase 3112 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-03-26Active, not recruiting
A Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of MEDI4736 as Monotherapy or in Combination With Tremelimumab With or Without Azacitidine in Subjects With Myelodysplastic Syndrome After Treatment With Hypomethylating Agents [NCT02117219]Phase 167 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-20Completed
Eradicating Measurable Residual Disease in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Prior to StEm Cell Transplantation (ERASE): A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial [NCT05554419]Phase 2184 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-08-16Not yet recruiting
A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Magrolimab in Combination With Azacitidine Versus Physician's Choice of Venetoclax in Combination With Azacitidine or Intensive Chemotherapy in Previously Untreated Patients Wit [NCT04778397]Phase 3346 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-01Active, not recruiting
A Phase 1 First in Human Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of AMG 176 in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma and Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT02675452]Phase 1142 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-13Active, not recruiting
A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Unrelated Umbilical Cord Blood Microtransplantation in Patients With Higher-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT06109064]Phase 214 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-27Recruiting
A Collaboration Phase 2 Study of Venetoclax in Combination With Conventional Chemotherapy in Pediatric Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT05955261]Phase 270 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-25Recruiting
A Phase Ib/II Study of the Histone Methyltransferase Inhibitor Pinometostat in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients With 11q23-Rearranged Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT03701295]Phase 1/Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-03-06Completed
Proof-Of-Concept Study of Metabolically Optimized, Non-Cytotoxic 5-Azacitidine and Decitabine Epigenetic Therapy for Myeloid Malignancies [NCT04187703]Early Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-16Recruiting
A Phase I Study of Tagraxofusp With or Without Chemotherapy in Pediatric Patients With Relapsed or Refractory CD123 Expressing Hematologic Malignancies [NCT05476770]Phase 154 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-11Recruiting
A Phase 1/2, Multicenter, Open-label Study of FT-2102 as a Single Agent and in Combination With Azacitidine or Cytarabine in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome With an IDH1 Mutation [NCT02719574]Phase 1/Phase 2336 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-30Active, not recruiting
Phase 2 Study of SGI-110 in Patients With Higher Risk MDS [NCT02131597]Phase 271 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-10Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Azacitidine Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care in Subjects With Red Blood Cell Transfusion-dependent Anemia and Thrombocytope [NCT01566695]Phase 3216 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-26Active, not recruiting
Phase II Randomized Trial With A Modified Dose & Schedule of Subcutaneously Administered Azacitidine & Erythropoietin v Azacitidine Alone in Patients With Low-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (Less Than 11% Marrow & Peripheral Blood Blasts) [NCT00379912]Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Insufficient response rate)
Phase I Study of Azacitidine in Combination With Cisplatin Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck [NCT00443261]Phase 11 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Accrual problems)
A Phase I Study of Vosaroxin Plus Azacitidine for Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT01913951]Phase 135 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-22Active, not recruiting
A Phase I/II Clinical Trial of Omacetaxine, Azacitidine, and G-CSF for Relapsed and/or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT02835794]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Lack of funding to support clinical trial)
Azacitidine With Rituximab, Vincristine, and Cyclophosphamide in Refractory Lymphoma: A Phase I Trial [NCT00901069]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
Phase I Study of Azacitidine in Combination With Cisplatin in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer or Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck [NCT00901537]Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Sponsor terminated due to no enrollments within last 4 months.)
A Prospective Single-center Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide Combined With Azacitidine vs Azacitidine in the Treatment of MDS-RS [NCT06004765]Phase 4138 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-31Not yet recruiting
A Phase I Dose-Finding Clinical Trial With Expansion Cohort Evaluating CC-486 in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory T-Cell Large Granular Lymphocytic Leukemia (T-LGLL) [NCT05141682]Phase 1/Phase 221 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-01Recruiting
A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Venetoclax in Combination With Azacitidine and CAG(VA-CAG) as Induction Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia(AML) [NCT05662956]Phase 1/Phase 262 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-01Recruiting
A Phase 1/2, Open-label, 2-arm Study Evaluating BLU-263 as Monotherapy and in Combination With Azacitidine, in Patients With KIT Altered Hematologic Malignancies [NCT05609942]Phase 1/Phase 267 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-25Recruiting
A Phase 1 Study of AMG 176 as Monotherapy and in Combination With Azacitidine in Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia [NCT05209152]Phase 1120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-14Recruiting
A Phase Ib Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of IBI188 in Combination With Demethylating Agents in Subjects With Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT04485052]Phase 1/Phase 2222 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-25Suspended(stopped due to Pause for changes in development strategies)
An Open-label, Phase II Basket Study of a hypoMEThylating Agent Oral Azacitidine and DURvalumab (MEDI4736) (Anti-PDL1) in Advanced Solid Tumors (METADUR) [NCT02811497]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Completed
The Feasibility of a Bridging Treatment With Low-dose Azacitidine (AZA) in Combination With Short Term CAG Derived Regimen Prior to Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation (Allo-HSCT) in Patients With Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) [NCT04216355]Phase 2/Phase 320 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-31Recruiting
Eradicating Measurable Residual Disease in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Prior to StEm Cell Transplantation (ERASE): A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial [NCT05628623]Phase 2184 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-23Not yet recruiting
A Single Arm Phase II Trial to Assess Cobicistat Boosted Venetoclax in Combination With Azacitidine (sc) in Adult Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML) Who Are Not Considered Candidates for Intensive Treatment Regimens [NCT06014489]Phase 2142 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-31Not yet recruiting
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Venetoclax Combined With Decitabine/Azacitidine and Aclarubicin Versus Venetoclax Combined With Decitabine/Azacitidine in Treatment-Naive Elderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT05264883]Phase 3170 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-01Recruiting
A Phase II/III Randomized Study of R-MiniCHOP With or Without CC-486 (Oral Azacitidine) in Participants Age 75 Years or Older With Newly Diagnosed Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma, Grade IIIB Follicular Lymphoma, Transformed Lymphoma, and High-Grade B-Cell L [NCT04799275]Phase 2/Phase 3422 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-20Recruiting
A Phase I/II Study of Venetoclax in Combination With Azacitidine in Relapsed/Refractory High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) [NCT04550442]Phase 1/Phase 258 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-04Recruiting
A Phase 1a/1b Dose-Escalation and Expansion Trial of TTI-622 in Patients With Advanced Hematologic Malignancies, Including Lymphoma, Leukemia, and Multiple Myeloma [NCT03530683]Phase 1177 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-07Active, not recruiting
Phase Ib, Open Label, Combination Study of Nintedanib With 5-Azacitidine in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Characterized by HOX Gene Overexpression, That Are Not Candidates of Intensive Chemotherapy [NCT03513484]Phase 144 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-11-14Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3 Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized Study of ASP2215 Versus Salvage Chemotherapy in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) With FLT3 Mutation [NCT02421939]Phase 3371 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-20Active, not recruiting
Phase I/II Study of Sorafenib and 5-Azacitidine for the Treatment of Patients With Refractory or Relapsed Acute Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) - (VZ-MDS-PI-0227) [NCT01254890]Phase 1/Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
A Multisite Phase Ib Study of Pevonedistat, Azacitidine (or Decitabine), and Venetoclax (PAVE) for the Treatment of Patients With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) [NCT04172844]Phase 124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-13Active, not recruiting
A Phase I and Phase II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Maintenance Treatment With Azacitidine With or Without Ceplene/Interleukin-2 in Patients With Higher Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes Who Achieved Hematological Response to Azacitidine [NCT01324960]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Withdrawn
A Phase II Study of Azacitidine (Vidaza®) Combined to Epoetin Beta (NeoRecormon®) in IPSS Low-risk and Intermediate-1 MDS Patients, Resistant to ESA [NCT01015352]Phase 298 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
A Phase I/II Study of Azacitidine (Vidaza), Docetaxel and Prednisone for Patients With Hormone Refractory Metastatic Prostate Cancer Previously Treated With a Taxotere Containing Regimen. [NCT00503984]Phase 1/Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Withdrawal of Funding)
A Phase 1 Study of CTEP 5-Azacytidine in Combination With Oxaliplatin in Patients With Advanced Cancers Relapsed or Refractory or Refractory to Any Platinum Therapy [NCT01039155]Phase 141 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
A Phase I/II Study of Entinostat in Combination With 5-Azacytidine in Patients With Recurrent Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00387465]Phase 1/Phase 294 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
An Randomized Controlled Study of Azacitidine Combined With Homoharringtonine Compared With Azacitidine for Patients With Int/High -Risk MDS and AML-MRC [NCT03978364]Phase 3100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-06-01Recruiting
Phase II Study of Azacitidine in Myelofibrosis [NCT00381693]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Due to lack of accrual and trial has demonstrated too little clinical benefit)
A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-label, Dose-escalation Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Clinical Activity of Orally Administered LP-108 as Monotherapy and in Combination With Azacitidine in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory My [NCT04139434]Phase 136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-06Recruiting
Expanded Access for CC-486 [NCT03723135]0 participants Expanded AccessApproved for marketing
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of AG-120 in Combination With Azacitidine in Subjects ≥ 18 Years of Age With Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia With an IDH1 Mutation [NCT03173248]Phase 3146 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-26Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of Ruxolitinib and Azacytidine Combination as a Therapy for Patients With Myelofibrosis and Myelodysplastic Syndrome/ Myeloproliferative Neoplasm [NCT01787487]Phase 2125 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-03-13Recruiting
Inhibition of DNA Methylation by 1-Hr Infusion of 5-aza-2'-Deoxycitidine (Decitabine) x 10 Days (M-F) With Escalating Doses of Sub-Q Pegylated (PEG) Interferon-alpha 2B (PEG-Intron): A Phase I Study With Molecular Correlates [NCT00701298]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Terminated
A Single-arm, Open-label, Phase II Study of Sabatolimab in Combination With Azacitidine and Venetoclax in Adult Participants With High or Very High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) as Per IPSS-R Criteria [NCT04812548]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-05-31Completed
A Phase 1b/2 Open-Label, Randomized Study of 2 Combinations of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH) Mutant Targeted Therapies Plus Azacitidine: Oral AG-120 Plus Subcutaneous Azacitidine and Oral AG-221 Plus SC Azacitidine in Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Acute [NCT02677922]Phase 1/Phase 2130 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-03Active, not recruiting
A Phase I, Dose-Ranging Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Azacitidine Administered Subcutaneously (SC) and as Different Oral Formulations in Subjects With Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS), Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML), Acute My [NCT00761722]Phase 131 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-12Completed
A Phase IIA Study of Subcutaneous 5-aza-2'- Deoxycytidine (Decitabine) in Patients With Thalassemia Intermedia [NCT00661726]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
A Pilot Study Of Pre-Transplant 5-Azacitidine (Vidaza) In Patients With High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Who Are Candidates For Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation [NCT00660400]25 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Azacitidine, Venetoclax and Trametinib for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT04487106]Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-07-21Completed
A Randomized, Multi-center Phase II Trial to Assess the Efficacy of 5-azacytidine Added to Standard Primary Therapy in Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed AML [NCT00915252]Phase 2214 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
Pilot Study of 5 Azacytidine in the Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Acute Myeloid Leukaemia With High-risk (Chromosome 7 and or Complex) Cytogenetic Abnormalities [NCT00915785]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
A Phase I Study of a Combination of 5-azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide in High-risk MDS or Relapsed/Refractory AML Patients With Cytogenetic Abnormalities Including -5 or Del(5q) [NCT00923234]Phase 10 participants Interventional2009-06-30Terminated(stopped due to The primary objective has already been answered with the number of recruited patients.)
A Phase 4, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Subcutaneous Azacitidine in Adult Taiwanese Subjects With Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes. [NCT01201811]Phase 444 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-01Completed
Phase I Study of Vidaza and Velcade (Bortezomib) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT00624936]Phase 123 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
Venetoclax and Azacitidine Combination Therapy for Patients With Accelerated or Blast Phase BCR-ABL Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (VAAMP) [NCT05074355]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-16Not yet recruiting
A Phase 1/1b Study of Pevonedistat in Combination With Select Standard of Care Agents in Patients With Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia, Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, or Advanced Solid Tumors With Severe Renal Impairmen [NCT03814005]Phase 117 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-07-10Completed
A Multi-phase, Dose-Escalation Followed by an Open-label, Randomized, Crossover Study of Oral ASTX030 (Cedazuridine and Azacitidine Given in Combination) Versus Subcutaneous Azacitidine in Subjects With Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS), Chronic Myelomonocy [NCT04256317]Phase 2/Phase 3317 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-05-21Recruiting
A Phase II Study of the Impact of Clinicogenetic Risk-Stratified Management on Outcomes of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Older Patients [NCT03226418]Phase 275 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-07Active, not recruiting
Phase 1b, Multi-arm, Open-label Study of PDR001 and/or MBG453 in Combination With Decitabine in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT03066648]Phase 1241 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-06Completed
A Phase 1 Open-label Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of AMG 397 in Subjects With Selected Relapsed or Refractory Hematological Malignancies [NCT03465540]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-17Terminated(stopped due to Strategic decisions)
5-Azacytidine to Treat Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Elderly or Frail Patients Not Suitable for Intensive Chemotherapy. A Multicenter Phase II Trial. [NCT00739388]Phase 247 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of CC-486 (Onureg®) in Subjects With Moderate or Severe Hepatic Impairment Compared With Normal Hepatic Function in Adult Subjects With Myeloid Malignancies [NCT05209295]Phase 132 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-30Recruiting
Phase Ib/II Investigator Initiated Study of the IDH1-Mutant Inhibitor Ivosidenib (AG120) With the BCL2 Inhibitor Venetoclax +/- Azacitidine in IDH1-Mutated Hematologic Malignancies [NCT03471260]Phase 1/Phase 296 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-03-19Recruiting
Phase II Study of Azacitidine and Entinostat (SNDX-275) in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer [NCT01349959]Phase 258 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-21Active, not recruiting
A Phase I Dose Escalation Study of Oral SB939 When Administered Thrice Weekly (Every Other Day) for 3 Weeks in a 4-week Cycle in Patients With Advanced Malignancies [NCT00741234]Phase 185 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
A Phase Ib/IIb, Open-label, Multi-center, Study of Oral Panobinostat (LBH589) Administered With 5-Azacitidine (in Adult Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS), Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML), or Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). [NCT00946647]Phase 1/Phase 2113 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-02Completed
Randomized Controlled Study of Post-transplant Azacitidine for Prevention of Acute Myelogenous Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome Relapse (VZ-AML-PI-0129) [NCT00887068]Phase 3187 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-21Completed
Clinical and Biological Effects of 5-Azacitidine Five Days/Monthly Schedule in Symptomatic Low-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDSs) [NCT00897130]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
A Phase Ⅱ, Open Label, Single Arm, Single-Center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Azacitidine,Venetoclax,and Flumatinib in Newly Diagnosed Ph-positive Acute Leukemia and CML-AP/BP Patients [NCT05433532]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-01Recruiting
A RANDOMIZED (1:1), DOUBLE-BLIND, MULTI-CENTER, PLACEBO CONTROLLED STUDY EVALUATING INTENSIVE CHEMOTHERAPY WITH OR WITHOUT GLASDEGIB (PF-04449913) OR AZACITIDINE (AZA) WITH OR WITHOUT GLASDEGIB IN PATIENTS WITH PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA [NCT03416179]Phase 3730 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-20Completed
A Proof of Concept Study of Non-DNA Damaging DNMT1 Depletion Therapy for Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT01165996]Phase 1/Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
Phase I/IIa Study of the Oral 5-Azacitidine in Combination With the Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Romidepsin for the Treatment of Patients With Relapsed and Refractory Lymphoid Malignancies [NCT01998035]Phase 1/Phase 252 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-30Terminated(stopped due to PI left institution)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled, Open-label, Clinical Study of Pevonedistat Plus Azacitidine Versus Single-Agent Azacitidine as First-Line Treatment for Patients With Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia, or Low-Blast A [NCT03268954]Phase 3454 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-28Active, not recruiting
A Phase Ib Study of the Safety, Pharmacokinetic of APG-2575 Single Agent and in Combination With Homoharringtonine or Azacitidine in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory AML [NCT04501120]Phase 1/Phase 2284 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-28Recruiting
Phase I Study of Epigenetic Priming Using Azacitidine With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Resectable Esophageal Cancer [NCT01386346]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
A Phase I Study of the Safety and Feasibility of Azacitidine After Donor Lymphocyte Infusion for Patients With Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT01390311]Phase 114 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
A Study of Chidamide With AZA in MRD Positive AML After Transplant [NCT06066905]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-26Recruiting
A Phase Ib Trial of Azacitidine, Venetoclax and Allogeneic NK Cells for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (ADVENT-AML) [NCT05834244]Phase 132 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-26Recruiting
"Phase I/II of Venetoclax in Combination With Azacitidine in Treatment Naïve and Relapse Refractory High Risk MDS Individuals" [NCT04160052]Phase 1/Phase 2116 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-01Recruiting
Comparison Between 5-azacytidine Treatment and 5-azacytidine Followed by Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Elderly Patients With Advanced MDS According to Donor Availability [NCT01404741]Phase 2191 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-31Completed
A Phase I/II Study of Venetoclax and Azacitidine and Lintuzumab-Ac225 in Patients With Refractory or Relapsed AML [NCT03932318]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-03-31Withdrawn(stopped due to study postponed)
A Phase I/II Study Evaluating The Efficacy OF 5-Azacitidine And Bevacizumab In Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT00934440]Phase 1/Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Terminated
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of Oral Azacitidine Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Best Supportive Care as Maintenance Therapy in Japanese Subjects With Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Complete Remi [NCT05197426]Phase 215 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-17Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Cladribine and Low Dose Cytarabine in Combination With Venetoclax, Alternating With Azacitidine and Venetoclax, in Patients With Higher-risk Myeloproliferative Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia or Higher-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes Wi [NCT05365035]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-23Recruiting
A Phase 1, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Parallel Group Study to the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Subcutaneous Azacitidine in Adult Cancer Patients With and Without Impaired Renal Function [NCT00652626]Phase 131 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-01Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Venetoclax in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients Newly Diagnosed With Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (Higher-Risk MDS) [NCT04401748]Phase 3531 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-10Active, not recruiting
Azacitidine Maintenance Therapy After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML) [NCT00813124]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
Phase I/II Trial of Azacitidine Plus Lenalidomide in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT01016600]Phase 1/Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
Phase IA/B Combination Study of ADI-PEG 20, Venetoclax and Azacitidine in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [NCT05001828]Phase 160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-05Recruiting
A Phase II Study of the Combination of Azacitidine and Pembrolizumab for Patients Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT05355051]Phase 224 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-05Recruiting
A Pilot Study of 5-Azacytidine and Oral Sodium Phenylbutyrate in Severe Thalassemia [NCT00005934]Phase 224 participants Interventional2000-06-30Completed
Randomized Phase 3 Study Evaluation the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Azacitidine(CC-486) Compared to Investigator's Choice Therapy in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Angioimmunoblastic T Cell Lymphoma [NCT03703375]Phase 322 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-06Active, not recruiting
A Phase I/II Clinical Trial of the Hypomethylating Agent Azacitidine (Vidaza) With the Nanoparticle Albumin Bound Paclitaxel (Abraxane) in the Treatment of Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors and Breast Cancer [NCT00748553]Phase 1/Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
A Phase II Open-Label, Single-arm, Two-Stage, Multicenter Trial of Pracinostat in Combination With Azacitidine in Elderly (Age 65 Years or Older) Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [NCT01912274]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-24Completed
A Phase 1 Protocol of 5-Azacytidine and Erlotinib in Advanced Solid Tumor Malignancies [NCT00996515]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
A Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Preliminary Efficacy of LP-108, a BCL-2 Inhibitor, Combined With Azacitidine In Subjects With AML, MDS, CMML [NCT05641259]Phase 1198 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-14Recruiting
A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Romiplostim (AMG 531) Treatment of Subjects With Low or Intermediate Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Receiving Hypomethylating Agents [NCT00321711]Phase 269 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-01Completed
A Phase I Trial Evaluating the Effects of Plerixafor (AMD3100) and G-CSF in Combination With Azacitidine (Vidaza) for the Treatment of MDS [NCT01065129]Phase 128 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-02Completed
Clinical and Biological Evaluation of Azacitidine in Transfusion-dependent Patients With Low and Intermediate-1 Risk MDS, and Low-risk CMML, Who Are Either Refractory to or Not Eligible for Treatment With Erythropoietin +/- G-CSF [NCT01048034]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Intravenous Azacitidine Alone in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT00384956]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
A PHASE 2, SINGLE ARM STUDY TO DETERMINE THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF AZACITIDINE, AND LENALIDOMIDE IN HIGHER RISK MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROME [NCT01053806]Phase 26 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-08-31Recruiting
A Randomized Multicenter Phase III Study to Evaluate the Role of All-trans Retinoic Acid (ATRA) in Combination With Induction Chemotherapy, or Azacitidine and Idarubicin as Salvage Therapy and Idarubicin With Cytarabine or Azacitidine as Maintenance Thera [NCT01067274]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Study abandoned)
A Randomized Phase II Trial of Azacitidine With or Without the Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Entinostat for the Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (Dysplastic Type), and Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Multilineage Dysplasi [NCT00313586]Phase 2197 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
Genome-Wide Methylation and Gene Re-expression Analysis of Resectable Lung Tumor Tissue Pairs Obtained Pre- and Post-Treatment With 5-Azacytidine and Entinostat [NCT01886573]Phase 140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-06-30Terminated
A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-label, Dose-escalation Study of Oral Azacitidine (CC-486) in Japanese Subjects With Hematological Neoplasms [NCT01908387]Phase 12 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Due to Slow Accrual study was terminated.)
A Phase 1b/2 Study of IMGN632 as Monotherapy or Combination With Venetoclax and/or Azacitidine for Participants With CD123-Positive Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT04086264]Phase 1/Phase 2292 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-11-06Recruiting
A Phase I/II Study of Azacitidine, Venetoclax and Pevonedistat in Adults With Newly Diagnosed Secondary or Therapy-Related AML [NCT03862157]Phase 1/Phase 251 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-27Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Toxicity of SGI-110 With DLI for the Treatment of AML or MDS Relapsing After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT02684162]Phase 255 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-22Active, not recruiting
A Phase I Multicenter Study of Arsenic Trioxide and Azacitidine in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT00234000]Phase 11 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Terminated(stopped due to The study was closed due to poor enrollment)
Phase II Randomized Study of Pembrolizumab With or Without Epigenetic Modulation With CC-486 in Patients With Platinum-resistant Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube or Primary Peritoneal Cancer [NCT02900560]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-20Terminated
A Phase 1b Dose Escalation Study of Lemzoparlimab in Combination With Venetoclax and/or Azacitidine in Subjects With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) [NCT04912063]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-06-25Completed
A Prospective, Single-Arm, 2-Stage, Open-label, Phase II Trial of Azacitidine in Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma. [NCT00412919]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Lack of efficacy)
Expanded Access Program: Pevonedistat (in Combination With Azacitidine) for the First-line Treatment of Higher Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT04484363]0 participants Expanded AccessNo longer available
A Phase 1b Study Evaluating Safety, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Efficacy of BC3402 in Combination With Azacitidine in Subjects With Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) [NCT05970822]Phase 132 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-18Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Phase 3 Study of Venetoclax in Combination With Azacitidine Versus Azacitidine in Treatment Naïve Subjects With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Ineligible for Standard Induction Therapy [NCT02993523]Phase 3443 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-02Active, not recruiting
Phase III Randomized Trial of Clofarabine as Induction and Post-Remission Therapy vs. Standard Daunorubicin &Amp; Cytarabine Induction and Intermediate Dose Cytarabine Post-Remission Therapy, Followed by Decitabine Maintenance vs. Observation in Newly-Dia [NCT02085408]Phase 3727 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-04Active, not recruiting
Safety and Efficacy of Venetoclax and Azacitidine for Newly Diagnosed Non-Elderly Adult Patients (Aged 18-59) With Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT03573024]Phase 236 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-11-28Recruiting
Pharmacoeconomics in the Application of 5-azacitidine in the Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT04296214]0 participants (Actual)Observational2020-01-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Poor recruitment)
Phase I Study of Inhaled Vidaza® in Patients With Advanced NSCLC [NCT02009436]Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-09Completed
Sequential Administration of 5-azacytidine (AZA) and Donor Lymphocyte Infusion (DLI) for Patients With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) and Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) in Relapse After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation. [NCT02017457]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
Pilot Study of Sodium Phenylbutyrate Plus Azacytidine [NCT00006019]Phase 20 participants Interventional2000-05-31Completed
A Phase I/II Trial Of Very Low to Low-Doses of Continuous Azacitidine in Combination With Standard Doses of Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT01155583]Phase 1/Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
Treatment of High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Not Candidates for Allogeneic Transplantation of Hematopoietic Progenitors (ALO-HSCT) [NCT04602273]150 participants (Anticipated)Observational2016-12-12Recruiting
A Phase II, Single Arm Study of Tislelizumab Combined With DNA Demethylation Agent +/- CAG Regimen in the Treatment of Patients With High-risk AML or AML Patients Older Than 60 Years of Age Who Are Unfit for Intensive Chemotherapy [NCT04541277]Phase 255 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-01Recruiting
A Phase 2 Trial Investigating Decitabine in Combination With a JAK-Inhibitor as a Bridge to Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant in Patients With Accelerated/Blast Phase Myeloproliferative Neoplasms [NCT04282187]Phase 225 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-03-24Recruiting
Dexamethasone Plus Salvage Chemotherapy Versus Salvage Chemotherapy Alone in Patients With First Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia: a Randomized, Controlled, Open-label, Multicenter, Phase III Study [NCT03765541]Phase 3142 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-13Recruiting
A Phase II Trial of Epigenetic Priming in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT03164057]Phase 2206 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-15Active, not recruiting
An Open-Label Phase II Study of Nivolumab (BMS-936558) in Combination With 5-Azacytidine (Vidaza) or Nivolumab With Ipilimumab in Combination With 5-Azacytidine for the Treatment of Patients With Refractory/ Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Newly Diagn [NCT02397720]Phase 2149 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-07Completed
Combination of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab With 5-Azacitidine in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) [NCT02530463]Phase 299 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-08Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of the Use of 5-Azacytidine as Pre-Transplant Cytoreduction Prior to Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT00721214]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
Tagraxofusp-Based Therapy to Eradicate Measurable Residual Disease of Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Prior to Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation [NCT05720988]Phase 129 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-08-03Not yet recruiting
A Phase II Trial With Azacitidine Single Agent in Newly Diagnosed Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) Veterans Administration (VA) Elderly Patients Who Are Ineligible for Standard Induction Therapy: A Department of Veterans Affairs Multi-Site Study [NCT00728520]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-07-31Recruiting
A Prospective, Single Arm, Multicenter Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Venetoclax Combined With Azacytidine or DA Regimen in Prevention the Relapse of Consecutive MRD Positive AML Patients [NCT05361057]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-01Recruiting
An Open-Label, Dose Escalation, Phase 1 Study of MLN4924, a Novel Inhibitor of Nedd8-Activating Enzyme, in Adult Patients With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia,Myelodysplastic Syndrome, and Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [NCT00911066]Phase 172 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Clinical Research for Azacitidine Combined With Low-dose Dasatinib in Maintenance Therapy of Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT05042531]30 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-13Recruiting
Belinostat Combined With Azacitidine/Gemcitabine/Busulfan/Melphalan With Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation in Refractory or Relapsed Lymphoma [NCT02701673]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-30Withdrawn
A Phase II Multicenter Single-armed Study Using Subject-specific Minimal Residual Disease Markers to Adopt Treatment After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Subjects With Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT05788679]Phase 2200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-22Recruiting
A Phase I Study of Venetoclax in Combination With Cytotoxic Chemotherapy, Including Calaspargase Pegol, for Children, Adolescents and Young Adults With High-Risk Hematologic Malignancies [NCT05292664]Phase 192 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-29Recruiting
A Phase 2 Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Epigenetic Modulation in Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma and Marginal Zone Lymphoma [NCT01121757]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Terminated(stopped due to The study closed temporarily in February 2012 pending analysis of samples collected. In October, 2012, Celgene requested closure of the study.)
Optimizing and Personalising Azacitidine Combination Therapy for Treating Solid Tumours Using the Quadratic Phenotypic Optimization Platform (QPOP) and an Artificial Intelligence-based Platform (CURATE.AI) [NCT05381038]Phase 1/Phase 210 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-30Not yet recruiting
Peptide Vaccination in Combination With Azacitidine for Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia - A Phase I Study [NCT02750995]Phase 15 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-30Completed
A Phase I Dose-Escalation Study Of Azacitidine In Combination With Temozolomide In Patients With Unresectable Or Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma or Malignant Mesothelioma [NCT00629343]Phase 128 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Active, not recruiting
Phase II Study of Azacitadine and Entinostat in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT01105377]Phase 247 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
A Multi-center Phase II Study of CC486-CHOP in Patients With Previously Untreated Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma [NCT03542266]Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-01Completed
A Phase II Study of the Combination of Azacitidine and Pembrolizumab for Patients With MDS [NCT03094637]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-06Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Study of Azacitidine (Vidaza®) Versus Conventional Care Regimens for the Treatment of Older Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT01074047]Phase 3488 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-01Completed
A Phase 1-2 Study of Azacitidine in Combination With Lenalidomide for Previously Untreated Elderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT00890929]Phase 1/Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
A Phase 2 Trial of Vorinostat in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients With Newly-Diagnosed Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) or Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Who Are Ineligible for Other Leukemia Protocols [NCT00948064]Phase 2110 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-08Completed
A Phase 1/2 Study to Assess the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of Daily Intravenous AB8939 in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT05211570]Phase 1/Phase 278 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-01Recruiting
A Phase 2 Study of Chidamide, Azacitidine Combined With GM Regimen for Patients With Relapsed and Refractory DLBCL [NCT05823701]Phase 223 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-30Recruiting
A Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study of Pracinostat in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients With Previously Untreated International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) Intermediate Risk-2 or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) [NCT01873703]Phase 2102 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
Phase II Trial of Venetoclax in Combination With Azacitidine and CAG as Induction Therapy in Patients With Refractory/Relapse Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT05807347]Phase 242 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-01Recruiting
Phase I Study of Prolonged Low Dose Decitabine (5-Aza-Deoxycytidine, NSC #127716) in Patients With Biopsiable Advanced Cancers Refractory to Standard Therapy [NCT00089089]Phase 142 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Terminated
Neoadjuvant Azacitidine With Carboplatin and Paclitaxel for Suboptimal Newly Diagnosed Ovarian Cancer [NCT00842582]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Withdrawn(stopped due to No enrollment. Unable to recruit due to lack of eligible patients.)
A Phase I/II, Multi-Center Study of Mocetinostat (MGCD0103) in Combination With Azacitidine in Subjects With Intermediate or High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) [NCT02018926]Phase 1/Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Adaptive Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Based on D14 MRD results-a Multicenter, Single-arm, Prospective Clinical Study [NCT05736978]Phase 258 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-31Recruiting
Phase I Study of Decitabine (Dacogen) and Bortezomib (Velcade) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT00703300]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
The Efficacy and Safety of Azacitidine in Combination With Chidamide in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Unfit for Conventional Chemotherapy [NCT04480125]Phase 228 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-20Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Azacitidine Combined With Interferon in the Treatment of Recurrence of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Myeloid Tumors of the Blood System [NCT04078399]30 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-08-28Recruiting
A Phase 2/3, Multicenter, Randomized, Dose Optimization (Part I), Double-blind (Part II) Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Azacitidine (Oral-Aza, ONUREG®) Plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) Versus Placebo Plus BSC in Participants With IPSS-R L [NCT05469737]Phase 2/Phase 3230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-14Recruiting
A Phase II Multi-center, Single Arm, Safety and Efficacy Study of MBG453 in Combination With Azacitidine and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in Adult Patients Unfit for Chemotherapy [NCT04150029]Phase 290 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-01Active, not recruiting
Multi Centers, Open-trial Phase II Study Evaluating 5-azacytidine (Vidaza®) + Valproic Acid (Depakine ®) Before Administration of Retinoic Acid (Vesanoid®) in Patients With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia and High Risk Myelodysplasia. [NCT00339196]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
A Phase 1 Study of 5-azacitidine in Combination With Interferon-Alfa 2B in Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma and Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT00217542]Phase 142 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
Phase I/II Study of SY-1425 (Tamibarotene) in Combination With Azacitidine and Venetoclax for Patients With Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia [NCT06085638]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-09-14Withdrawn(stopped due to Zero participants accrued)
A Phase 1/1b, Open-label Study of Pevonedistat (MLN4924, TAK-924) as Single Agent and in Combination With Azacitidine in Adult East Asian Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) [NCT02782468]Phase 123 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-16Completed
A Phase I/IIa, Open-Label Dose Escalation and Dose Expansion Study of Intravenous GFH009 Single Agent and in Combination With Venetoclax and Azacitidine in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Hematologic Malignancies [NCT04588922]Phase 1/Phase 2135 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-10Recruiting
Multicenter,Open Label,Phase 2 Clinical Study of Venetoclax Combined With CACAG Regimen in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT06068621]Phase 2200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-01Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Maintenance With Azacitidine in MDS Patients Achieving Complete or Partial Remission (CR or PR) After Intensive Chemotherapy [NCT00446303]Phase 239 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Terminated
Phase II Study of Decitabine in Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT00492401]Phase 255 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation and Expansion, Safety, Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamic, and Clinical Activity Study of Intravenously Administered IO-202 and IO-202 + Azacitidine ± Venetoclax in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Patients Wi [NCT04372433]Phase 1106 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-14Recruiting
A Phase 1, Open Label, Multicentre Clinical Trial of SyB C-1101 in Combination With Azacytidine in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT02783547]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Withdrawn(stopped due to The trial was withdrawn due to problems with the manufacture of the investigational drug.)
A Phase II Study of Venetoclax in Combination With Azacitidine in the Post-Transplant Setting for AML, T Cell Leukemia, and Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemia [NCT04128501]Phase 2125 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-05-05Recruiting
Four-Arm Randomized Phase II Study of SGI-110: 5 Days, Versus 10 Days, Versus 5 Days + Idarubicin, Versus 5 Days + Cladribine, in Previously Untreated Patients >/= 70 Years With Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT02096055]Phase 244 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-04Completed
A Single Arm Pilot Study of Azacitidine in Myelodysplastic Syndrome / Acute Myeloid Leukaemia, With Eltrombopag Support for Thrombocytopenia. [NCT01488565]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
A Phase II Trial of 5-Azacytidine (NSC #102816) and Ethyol (Amifostine) in the Treatment of Adults With Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT00005598]Phase 20 participants Interventional2000-10-31Completed
Phase I Investigation of the Feasibility of Combining 5-azacytidine With Highdose Cytarabine (HiDAC) and Mitoxantrone Chemotherapy in a Sequential Manner for Remission Induction in High-risk Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) [NCT01839240]Phase 150 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-06Completed
A Phase 1 Study of CC-486 as a Single Agent and in Combination With Carboplatin or ABI-007 in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Solid Tumors [NCT01478685]Phase 1169 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-29Completed
A Single Arm Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficiency of Azacitidine (AZA) Combination With Venetoclax and ATRA in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT05654194]Phase 330 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-31Recruiting
A Groupwide Pilot Study to Test the Tolerability and Biologic Activity of the Addition of Azacitidine (NSC# 102816) to Chemotherapy in Infants With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) and KMT2A (MLL) Gene Rearrangement [NCT02828358]Phase 278 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-01Active, not recruiting
A Phase 1 Study of Azacitidine in Combination With MEC (Mitoxantrone, Etoposide, Cytarabine) in Relapsed and Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT01249430]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-20Completed
A Phase II, Single Arm Study Examining the Combination of Revlimid (Lenalidomide) and Vidaza (Azacitidine) (RA-CLL) for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (SLL) [NCT01241786]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Terminated(stopped due to The study was closed early due to poor accrual)
A Phase 1b Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of IBI188 in Combination With Azacitidine in Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Higher Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) [NCT04511975]Phase 132 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-08-24Suspended(stopped due to pause for further assessment and study adjustment)
A Phase 1, Open-label, Dose-Escalation Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Oral Azacitidine in Subjects With Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS), Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) or Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML). [NCT00528983]Phase 1133 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-11Completed
Phase I Trial of Sequential Azacitidine and Valproic Acid Plus Carboplatin in the Treatment of Patients With Platinum Resistant Epithelial Ovarian Cancer [NCT00529022]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
Phase Ib Clinical Trial of TQB2928 Injection Combination Therapy in Patients With Hematological Malignancies [NCT06008405]Phase 148 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-30Recruiting
An Open-Label Phase Ib/II Multi-Arm Study of OX40 Agonist Monoclonal Antibody (mAb), Anti-PDL1 mAb, Smoothened Inhibitor, Anti-CD33 mAb, Bcl-2 Inhibitor and Azacitidine as Single-Agents and/or Combinations for the Treatment of Patients With Acute Myeloid [NCT03390296]Phase 1/Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-27Completed
Pilot Phase II Study of 5-Azacytidine in Previously Treated Patients With Advanced NSCLC [NCT01281124]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-12Completed
A Double-Blind, Phase III, Randomised Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Azacitidine (CC-486) Versus Placebo in Subjects With Acute Myeloid Leukaemia or Myelodysplastic Syndromes as Maintenance After Allogeneic Haematopoietic Stem Cell Trans [NCT04173533]Phase 3324 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-06-14Recruiting
A Prospective, Multi-Center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Venetoclax Combined With Azacitidine Regimen in Newly Diagnosed T-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients [NCT05376111]Phase 228 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-01Recruiting
Phase I Clinical Study of TQB2618 Injection in Combination With Demethylation Drugs in Patients With Recurrent/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT05426798]Phase 173 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-29Recruiting
Pilot Study Targeting Residual Hypermethylation in Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer As Part of Adjuvant Therapy and Preventive Strategy [NCT01209520]6 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
Phase 1 Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of APR-548 in Combination With Azacitidine for the Treatment of TP53-Mutant Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT04638309]Phase 14 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-09-20Terminated(stopped due to Sponsor decision)
Clinical Trial for the Safety and Efficacy of Induction Chemotherapy With Azacitidine+Venetoclax (VA) and Bridging CD19CD22 CAR-T Therapy in Adult Patients With Newly Diagnosed High-Risk and Ph-negative (Ph-) B-ALL [NCT06078306]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-10Not yet recruiting
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of Oral Azacitidine (CC-486) Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Best Supportive Care as Maintenance Therapy in Chinese Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Compl [NCT05413018]Phase 278 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-19Recruiting
An Open Pilot Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics, Tolerability, and Safety of NEX-18a Given as a Subcutaneous Injection for the Treatment of Intermediate 2 or Higher-risk MDS, CMML or AML [NCT05048498]Phase 12 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-04-27Completed
A Phase 1 Study of Oral LY3410738 in Patients With Advanced Hematologic Malignancies With IDH1 or IDH2 Mutations [NCT04603001]Phase 1260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-01Active, not recruiting
AZA PH GL 2003 CL 001 - Extension A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group, Phase 3 Trial of Subcutaneous Azacitidine Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Conventional Care Regimens Plus Best Supportive Care for the Treatment of Myelodysplastic S [NCT01186939]Phase 340 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-01Completed
A Phase II Simon Two-Stage Study of the Addition of Pracinostat to a Hypomethylating Agent (HMA) in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Who Have Failed to Respond or Maintain a Response to the HMA Alone [NCT01993641]Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
Primary Comparison of Liposomal Anthracycline Based Treatment Versus Conventional Care Strategies Before Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Higher Risk MDS and Oligoblastic AML [NCT04061239]Phase 2150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-08-19Recruiting
Oral Azacitidine (CC-486) Plus Salvage Chemotherapy in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma [NCT03450343]Phase 19 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-04Active, not recruiting
A Phase 2 Randomized Study Comparing Venetoclax and Azacitidine to Induction Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Fit Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT04801797]Phase 2172 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-20Recruiting
Phase I/II Trial of Azacytidine + R-CHOP in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma [NCT01004991]Phase 1/Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Restoration of Radioiodine Uptake in Thyroid Carcinoma: A Clinical Trial [NCT00004062]Phase 10 participants Interventional1999-07-31Completed
A Phase I Trial of SAHA (NSC 701852) and Decitabine (IND 50733, NSC 127716) in Patients With Relapsed, Refractory or Poor Prognosis Leukemia [NCT00357708]Phase 150 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
A Phase I/II Study of Weekly Schedule Of Brentuximab Vedotin Alone and In Combination With 5-Azacytidine In Cluster of Differentiation Antigen (CD30)-Positive Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT02096042]Phase 1/Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual.)
A Phase I Study of Decitabine in Combination With Valproic Acid in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00109824]Phase 142 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
A Phase 1 Study of Vorinostat (Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid; SAHA) in Combination With Decitabine in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors, Relapsed or Refractory Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia, or Chronic Myel [NCT00275080]Phase 180 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
Treatment of MDS/AML Patients With an Impending Hematological Relapse With Azacitidine Alone or in Combination With PEvonedistat - a Randomized Phase 2 Trial [NCT04712942]Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-01Completed
Phase II Study of the Targeted Mutant IDH2 Inhibitor Enasidenib in Combination With Azacitidine for Relapsed/Refractory AML [NCT03683433]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-09-18Recruiting
Clinical Study of Azacytidine Combined With Lenalidomide As Maintenance Therapy Based on MRD Monitoring In Elderly or Unfit Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT04490707]Phase 360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-01Recruiting
Venetoclax Combined With Azacitidine Plus Homoharringtonine Versus Venetoclax Combined With Azacitidine for Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia:an Open-label, Multicentre, Randomised Phase 3 Trial [NCT05457361]Phase 3162 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-01Recruiting
Lenalidomide and Azacitidine for Adaptive Immunotherapy in Multiple Myeloma: Pilot Study of Autologous Lymphocyte Mobilization Following Immuno-modulatory Therapy [NCT01050790]17 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
A Programme of Treatment Development for Older Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia and High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT00454480]Phase 2/Phase 32,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
Azacitidine Maintenance Therapy After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for AML and MDS [NCT00350818]Phase 190 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Arsenic Trioxide in Combination With 5-Azacitidine in Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT00118196]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Due to limited resources available to conduct study)
AVIDA The Vidaza® (Azacitidine) Patient Registry [NCT00481273]479 participants (Actual)Observational2006-10-31Completed
A Multicenter, Non-Randomized, Open-Label Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Azacitidine and Beta Erythropoietin Treatment in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome Red Cell Transfusion Dependent With Low or Intermediate -1 Risk. [NCT00495547]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Terminated
Phase I Study of Low-Dose Hypomethylating Agent Azacitidine Combined With the Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Valproic Acid in Patients With Advanced Cancers [NCT00496444]Phase 169 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
Phase 2 Study of 5 Days Azacytidine Priming Prior to Fludarabine, Cytarabine and Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) Combination for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AML [NCT02275663]Phase 237 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-12-31Recruiting
A Pilot Study of Oral Azacitidine (CC-486) Epigenetic Priming and Maintenance in Adult AML Patients Eligible for Reduced Intensity Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant [NCT06180863]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-11-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Lack of funding.)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Magrolimab Versus Placebo in Combination With Venetoclax and Azacitidine in Newly Diagnosed, Previously Untreated Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who [NCT05079230]Phase 3432 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-07Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Phase II Study of the Combination of 5-Azacytidine With Valproic Acid (VPA) Versus Low-Dose Ara-C in Patients With AML/MDS Not Eligible for Other Studies [NCT00382590]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
Phase II Study of 5-Azacytidine (Azacytidine; Vidaza) in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia [NCT00413478]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual.)
A Randomized, Phase IIB, Multicenter, Trial of Oral Azacytidine Plus Romidepsin Versus Investigator's Choice in Patients With Relapse or Refractory Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (PTCL) [NCT04747236]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-19Recruiting
"Randomized Phase I/II Study of 5-Azacytidine in Combination With Cytosine Arabinoside in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia or High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome - SPORE" [NCT00569010]Phase 1/Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
Phase II Study of the Addition of Azacitidine (NSC#102816) to Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Transplantation for Myelodysplasia (MDS) and Older Patients With AML [NCT01168219]Phase 268 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-15Completed
An Open-label Phase Ib Study of DSP107 for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) [NCT04937166]Phase 136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-13Recruiting
A Phase 2, International, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel Group to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Cc-486 (Oral Azacitidine) Alone in Combination With Durvalumab (MEDI4736) in Subjects With Myelodysplastic Syndromes Who Fail to Achieve a [NCT02281084]Phase 265 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-06Active, not recruiting
A Phase I/II Trial of the Combination 5-azacitidine and Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin Therapy for Treatment of Relapsed AML [NCT00766116]Phase 1/Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
Phase 1/Phase 2 Study of IMM01 Combined With Azacitidine in Patients With AML and MDS [NCT05140811]Phase 1/Phase 2126 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-05Recruiting
Tamibarotene in Combination With Venetoclax and Azacitidine in Previously Untreated Adult Patients Selected for RARA-positive AML Who Are Ineligible for Standard Induction Therapy [NCT04905407]Phase 295 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-26Recruiting
Phase II Study of Azacytidine Followed by GM-CSF in Patients With Low- or Intermediate-1- Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) [NCT01542684]Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Slow Accrual)
Randomized Phase II Trial With Safety run-in Phase Evaluating Low-dose AZA, ATRA and Pioglitazone Versus Standard Dose Azacitidine in Patients >=60 Years With AML Who Are Refractory to Standard Induction Chemotherapy [NCT02942758]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-10Terminated(stopped due to Due to financial reasons.)
A Phase 1 Study of Revumenib, Azacitidine, and Venetoclax in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients With Refractory or Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT06177067]Phase 124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-31Not yet recruiting
Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Venetoclax Plus Azacytidine Versus Daunorubicin Plus Cytarabine in Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Patients With Adverse Risk Features [NCT05939180]Phase 2/Phase 3108 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-01Recruiting
Adoptive Therapy With TCR Gene-engineered T Cells to Treat Patients With MAGE-C2-positive Melanoma and Head and Neck Cancer [NCT04729543]Phase 1/Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-10-20Recruiting
Infusion of 5-Azacytidine (5-AZA) Into the Fourth Ventricle or Resection Cavity in Children With Recurrent Posterior Fossa Ependymoma: A Pilot Study [NCT02940483]Early Phase 16 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-01Completed
A PHASE 1, MULTICENTER, OPEN-LABEL STUDY TO EVALUATE THE PHARMACOKINETICS AND EFFECT OF FOOD OF A NEW TABLET FORMULATION OF ORAL AZACITIDINE, AND TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ORAL AZACITIDINE IN SUBJECTS WITH MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES, CHRONIC M [NCT01519011]Phase 134 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-07Completed
ENHANCE: A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Study Comparing Magrolimab in Combination With Azacitidine Versus Azacitidine Plus Placebo in Treatment-naïve Patients With Higher Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT04313881]Phase 3539 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-09Terminated(stopped due to Study discontinued due to futility based on a planned analysis)
Phase I/II Study of the Combination of Quizartinib (AC220) With 5-Azacytidine or Low-Dose Cytarabine for the Treatment of Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) [NCT01892371]Phase 1/Phase 2200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-11-12Completed
A Phase 2 Study of Decitabine in Combination With Midostaurin (PKC412) for Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed FLT3-ITD/TKD Positive Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT01846624]Phase 213 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Accrual factor)
Phase I Trial of Oral 5-azacitidine With Romidepsin in Advanced Solid Tumors, With an Expansion Cohort in Virally Mediated Cancers and Liposarcoma [NCT01537744]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
A PHASE 1B, MULTI-CENTER, OPEN-LABEL STUDY OF THE MTOR KINASE INHIBITOR CC-223 IN COMBINATION WITH ERLOTINIB OR ORAL AZACITIDINE IN ADVANCED NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER [NCT01545947]Phase 176 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-01Completed
A Multicentre Open Randomized Phase II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Azacitidine Alone or in Combination With Lenalidomide in High-risk Myeloid Disease (High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia) With a Karyotype Including Del(5q [NCT01556477]Phase 272 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-03-31Recruiting
A Dose-Finding Trial of the Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor MS-275 (NSC 706995) in Combination With 5-Azacitidine (5AC, NSC 102816) in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS), Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMMoL) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [NCT00101179]Phase 163 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-03Completed
A Phase I/II Study to Evaluate the Safety Clinical and Biological Activity of a Humanized Monoclonal Antibody Targeting Netrin-1 (NP137) in Combination With Standard AZACITIDINE+ VENETOCLAX in Patients With Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT06150040]Phase 1/Phase 235 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-04Recruiting
A Phase I Study Of Decitabine (DAC) (IND # 50733) In Children With Relapsed Or Refractory Acute Leukemia [NCT00042796]Phase 121 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Administratively complete.)
Phase I Study of 5-Aza-2'-Deoxycytidine (Decitabine) as a Biologic Modifier of Retinoid Responsive Genes in Patients With High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (De-novo, Relapsed or Secondary) [NCT00049582]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-09-30Terminated
Pre-emptive Azacitidine and Donor Lymphocyte Infusions Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for High Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT01541280]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
A Phase I Study of Decitabine (NSC# 127716, IND# 50733) in Combination With Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide in the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Solid Tumors [NCT00075634]Phase 121 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-31Completed
A Phase I Study of Decitabine in Combination With Valproic Acid in Patients With Selected Hematologic Malignancies [NCT00079378]Phase 184 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-02-29Completed
A Phase I Study Of The Toxicities, Biologic And Clinical Effects Of Daily 5 Aza 2'Deoxycytidine (DAC), NSC 127716 (IND 50733) For Four Weeks In Patients With Advanced Malignancies [NCT00030615]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-12-31Completed
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Selinexol Combined With Azacitidine and Venetoclax (SAV Regimen) in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)-a Multi-center, Single-arm, Prospective Clinical Study [NCT05736965]Phase 258 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-20Recruiting
A Multicenter, Single-arm, Open Clinical Efficacy Observational Study of Cidapenem Combined With Azacitidine and Mitoxantrone Liposome (CAM) Regimen for Relapsed/Refractory Intra-nodal Follicular Adjuvant T-cell Lymphoma (nTFHL) [NCT05772728]23 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-30Not yet recruiting
A Phase 2, Open-Label, Multi-Center Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy of Second/Third-Line Treatment With NAB®-Paclitaxel (ABI-007) In Combination With Epigenetic Modifying Therapy Of CC-486, Or Immunotherapy of Durvalumab (MEDI4736), Or As Monotherapy [NCT02250326]Phase 2240 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-07Completed
Phase II Study of Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec, STI-571) (NSC#716051) and Decitabine (5-AZA-2'-Deoxycitidine) (NSC#127716), in Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Accelerated and Blastic Phases [NCT00054431]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-01-31Completed
A Phase I Study of 5-azacytidine (Vidaza) With Interferon α2b in Metastatic Melanoma Patients [NCT00398450]Phase 112 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
A Phase II Study of the Efficacy, Safety and Determinants of Response to 5-Azacitidine (Vidaza®) in Patients With Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) [NCT01350947]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
A Phase I Study of Decitabine in Combination With Valproic Acid in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00084981]Phase 125 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
Azacitidine Compared to Conventional Chemotherapy in Consolidation of Elderly Patients (65 Years or Older) With AML in First Complete Remission [NCT01794169]Phase 2130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Poor recruitment)
A Phase I/II Study of Revlimid (Lenalidomide) in Combination With Vidaza (Azacitidine) in Patients With Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) [NCT00352001]Phase 1/Phase 237 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
A Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of 5-Aza for Post-Remission Therapy of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Elderly Patients [NCT05188326]Phase 354 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-28Completed
MRD-guided Treatment With Pembrolizumab and Azacitidine in NPM1mut AML Patients With an Imminent Hematological Relapse [NCT03769532]Phase 228 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-08-21Recruiting
A Open Label, Phase II, Non Randomized, Clinical Trial of Chemotherapy Treatment With 5-Azacytidine Plus Valproic Acid and Eventually Atra for Patients Diagnosed With Intermediate II and High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS). EudraCT Number 2005-004811 [NCT00439673]Phase 262 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
An Exploratory Phase 1b Open-label Multi-arm Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CC-90009 in Combination With Anti-Leukemia Agents in Subjects With Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT04336982]Phase 1/Phase 276 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-08-05Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label, Phase 2 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Azacitidine Subcutaneous in Combination With Durvalumab (MEDI4736) in Previously Untreated Subjects With Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) or in Elderly ( [NCT02775903]Phase 2213 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-03Completed
A Pilot Study of CX-01 Combined With Azacitidine in the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT02995655]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-07Completed
A Multicenter Open-Label Phase 2a Study of Ibrutinib Monotherapy or in Combination With Either Cytarabine or Azacitidine in Subjects With Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT02351037]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Study data do not support development in AML.)
An Open-Label Phase IB/II Study of Magrolimab in Combination With Azacitidine and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [NCT04435691]Phase 1/Phase 2110 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-07-28Active, not recruiting
A Phase I Study of 5-Azacytidine in Combination With Chemotherapy for Children With Relapsed or Refractory ALL or AML [NCT01861002]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-22Completed
A Phase 2 Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Combination With Azacitidine in Subjects With Chemo-refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT02260440]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
A Phase III Multicenter, Randomized, Open Label Study of APR-246 in Combination With Azacitidine Versus Azacitidine Alone for the Treatment of (Tumor Protein) TP53 Mutant Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT03745716]Phase 3154 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-11Completed
A Prospective,Randomized,and Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Venetoclax Combined With CACAG Regimen and BAT Regimen in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT06084819]Phase 2200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-01Recruiting
A Single Arm, Open-label Phase 3b Study to Describe the Safety and Tolerability of Ivosidenib in Combination With Azacitidine in Adult Patients Newly Diagnosed With IDH1m Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Ineligible for Intensive Induction Chemotherapy [NCT05907057]Phase 3245 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-14Recruiting
Phase 1 Study of Venetoclax/Azacitidine or Venetoclax in Combination With Ziftomenib or Standard Induction Cytarabine/Daunorubicin (7+3) Chemotherapy in Combination With Ziftomenib for the Treatment of Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT05735184]Phase 1212 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-18Recruiting
A Phase 1b/2 Study of FT-2102 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and Gliomas With an IDH1 Mutation [NCT03684811]Phase 1/Phase 293 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-01Completed
An Open-label Phase I/IIa Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CCS1477 as Monotherapy and in Combination in Patients With Advanced Haematological Malignancies. [NCT04068597]Phase 1/Phase 2250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-08-09Recruiting
A Single-arm Clinical Study of Azacitidine in Combination With R-CHOP (ARCHOP) for the Treatment of TP53-mutated Previously Untreated Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma [NCT06158399]Phase 252 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-22Recruiting
A Multi-center, Prospective, Single-arm Study of Venetoclax Combining Chidamide and Azacitidine (VCA) in the Treatment of Refractory/Relapsed Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (R/R AML) [NCT05305859]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-01Recruiting
Phase I/II Study of Cytarabine or 5-Azacitidine Combined With Tosedostat to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability in Older Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or High Risk MDS [NCT01636609]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-20Terminated(stopped due to In 2013 the FDA put a temporary hold on the trial and the Phase II portion of this study was cancelled.)
Phase II Trial Examining Epigenetic Priming With Decitabine Followed by Idarubicin and Cytarabine for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AML. [NCT01607645]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Terminated(stopped due to The study was terminated early because there were other competing protocols.)
A Phase I Dose Escalation to Maximally Tolerated Dose Trial of 5-Azacytidine (5 AC, NSC 102816) in Combination With Sodium Phenylbutyrate (PB, NSC 657802) in Patients With Refractory Solid Tumors [NCT00005639]Phase 134 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-03-31Completed
A Randomized, Phase II, Comparative Study With a Parallel Control for Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of 5-day Azacitidine for Patients With Lower-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT01652781]Phase 292 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-03-31Recruiting
A Multicenter, Phase I/II Study of Sequential Epigenetic and Immune Targeting in Combination With Nab-Paclitaxel/Gemcitabine in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. [NCT04257448]Phase 1/Phase 275 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-05-25Active, not recruiting
Phase II Study of Azacitidine in Myelofibrosis [NCT00569660]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
A Phase 1b Study of ABT-199 (GDC-0199) in Combination With Azacitidine or Decitabine in Treatment-Naive Subjects With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Who Are Greater Than or Equal to 60 Years of Age and Who Are Not Eligible for Standard Induction Therapy [NCT02203773]Phase 1212 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-06Terminated(stopped due to Strategic considerations)
A Study of Using Epigenetic Modulators to Enhance Response to MK-3475 in Microsatellite Stable Advanced Colorectal Cancer [NCT02512172]Phase 127 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-19Completed
An Open Label, Phase I Trial of Intravenous Administration of Volasertib as Monotherapy and in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome After Hypomethylating Agents Treatment Failure [NCT02721875]Phase 11 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-28Terminated
An Open-label, Multicenter, Roll-over Study for Patients Who Have Completed a Prior Novartis-sponsored Sabatolimab (MBG453) Study and Are Judged by the Investigator to Benefit From Continued Treatment With Sabatolimab. [NCT05201066]Phase 270 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-13Recruiting
Phase I-II Study of Association of Deferasirox, Vitamin D and Azacytidine as Treatment of High Risk MDS (IPSS Int-2 and High) [NCT01718366]Phase 1/Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Active, not recruiting
Therapeutic Effect of Chemotherapy Azacytidine Plus CAOLD Regimen on Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Angioimmunoblastic T-cell Lymphoma [NCT06176027]Phase 1/Phase 252 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-30Recruiting
A Phase 1, Open-Label, Multicenter, Dose Escalation Study of PRT1419 Injection as Monotherapy or in Combination With Azacitidine or Venetoclax in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Myeloid or B-cell Malignancies [NCT05107856]Phase 1132 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-22Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase 3 Study of Tamibarotene Plus Azacitidine Versus Placebo Plus Azacitidine in Newly Diagnosed, Adult Patients Selected for RARA-positive Higher-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (SELECT MDS-1) [NCT04797780]Phase 3550 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-08Recruiting
An Open-label, Multicenter, Phase 1b Study of OV-1001 (Cusatuzumab; Anti-CD70 Monoclonal Antibody) in Combination With Background Therapy for the Treatment of Subjects With Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT04150887]Phase 161 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-12-23Active, not recruiting
Phase I Study of AR-42 and Decitabine in Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT01798901]Phase 113 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-17Completed
A Phase 1b, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study of MLN4924 Plus Azacitidine in Treatment-Naïve Patients With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Who Are 60 Years or Older [NCT01814826]Phase 164 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-10Completed
A Phase Ib/II Study Evaluating Navitoclax After Failure of Hypomethylating Agent and Venetoclax for Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT05564650]Phase 1/Phase 237 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-12Recruiting
A Phase 1b/2a, Open-label, Non-randomized Study of Birinapant in Combination With 5-azacitidine in Subjects With Myelodysplastic Syndrome Who Are Naïve, Refractory or Have Relapsed to 5-azacitidine Therapy [NCT01828346]Phase 1/Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
Administration of Tumor-Associated Antigen (TAA)-Specific Cytotoxic T-Lymphocytes to Patients With Active or Relapsed Hodgkin or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT01333046]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3b, Randomized, Open-Label, Double Crossover Study Comparing Treatment Preference Between Oral Decitabine/Cedazuridine and Azacitidine in Adult Patients With IPSS R Intermediate Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Low Blast Acute Myeloid Leukemia, IPSS Inte [NCT05883956]Phase 342 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-30Not yet recruiting
Study of the Effect of Demethylating Agent Azacitidine on Prevention of Acute Kidney Injury-chronic Kidney Disease Continuum [NCT05325099]Phase 1/Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-30Not yet recruiting
Addition of Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid (Vorinostat) to Azacitidine in Patients With Higher Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS): a Phase II add-on Study in Patients With Azacitidine Failure. [NCT01748240]Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Terminated(stopped due to inefficiency)
BLockade of PD-1 Added to Standard Therapy to Target Measurable Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia 2 (BLAST MRD AML-2): A Randomized Phase 2 Study of the Venetoclax, Azacitadine, and Pembrolizumab (VAP) Versus Venetoclax and Azacitadine as First L [NCT04284787]Phase 276 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-16Active, not recruiting
A Phase 1/2 Study of Vorinostat [Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid (SAHA)] in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients With the Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) [NCT00392353]Phase 1/Phase 2135 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-11-22Active, not recruiting
A MULTI-CENTER CONTINUATION STUDY EVALUATING AZACITIDINE WITH OR WITHOUT GLASDEGIB (PF-04449913) IN PATIENTS WITH PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA, MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROME OR CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA [NCT04842604]Phase 314 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-05-17Completed
Phase II Study of Venetoclax Added to Cladribine Plus Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC) Induction Followed by Consolidation With Cladribine Plus LDAC Alternating With 5-Azacitidine With Venetoclax in Patients With Untreated AML [NCT03586609]Phase 2145 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-10-25Recruiting
A Randomized, Controlled, Open-label, Multicenter Phase 3 Clinical Study to Evaluate Lemzoparlimab for Injection in Combination With Azacitidine (AZA) Versus AZA Monotherapy in Treatment-naïve Patients With Higher-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) [NCT05709093]Phase 3552 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-30Recruiting
A Phase Ib/II, Open Label, Proof-of-concept Study of Sabatolimab and Magrolimab-based Therapy for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT05367401]Phase 1/Phase 263 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-12-20Not yet recruiting
A Phase I/IB Pilot Study of CC-486 Combined With Lenalidomide and Obinutuzumab for Relapsed/Refractory Indolent B-Cell Lymphoma [NCT04578600]Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-23Active, not recruiting
Phase 1b/2a Safety and Immunogenicity of the DNMT Inhibitor Azacitidine During Anti-Tuberculosis Therapy [NCT03941496]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-10-31Withdrawn(stopped due to The study was halted prematurely due to Bristol-Myers Squibb's (BMS) decision to withdraw support for this study.)
Initial Cytoreductive Therapy for Myelodysplastic Syndrome Prior to Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (the ICT-HCT Study) [NCT01812252]Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-02Completed
A Phase 1 Study of CC-486 Plus Nivolumab in Patients With Hodgkin Lymphoma Refractory to PD-1 Therapy [NCT05162976]Phase 133 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-03Recruiting
Phase II Study of Clinical Efficacy of Venetoclax in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients With Therapy Related Myelodysplastic Syndrome (t-MDS) [NCT05379166]Phase 253 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-23Recruiting
A Phase Ib/II, Open Label Study of Sabatolimab as a Treatment for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Presence of Measurable Residual Disease After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT04623216]Phase 1/Phase 259 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-14Recruiting
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of Oral Azacitidine Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Best Supportive Care as Maintenance Therapy in Subjects With Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Complete Remission [NCT01757535]Phase 3472 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-24Active, not recruiting
Phase I-II Study of Low-Dose Azacitidine (Vidaza) in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Have Minimal Residual Disease While Receiving Therapy With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (VZ-CML-PI-0236) [NCT01460498]Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-08Completed
Onureg® (Oral Azacitidine) Post-Marketing Surveillance in Korean Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT06073769]154 participants (Anticipated)Observational2023-09-30Not yet recruiting
Department of Hematology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University. [NCT06073730]Phase 3154 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-01Not yet recruiting
To Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Azacitidine Combination With Venetoclax for Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Fit Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients:A Multicenter, Single-arm Study [NCT05471700]Phase 1/Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-01Recruiting
Phase I Trial of Azacitidine Plus Nivolumab Following Reduced-intensity Allogeneic PBSC Transplantation for Patients With AML and High-risk Myelodysplasia Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium BTCRC-AML18-342 [NCT04128020]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-10Withdrawn(stopped due to Funder withdrew funding after not accruing any subjects after 1 year.)
A Umbrella Study in Relapsed/Refractory Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma Guided by Molecular Subtypes [NCT05559008]Phase 1/Phase 2116 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-30Recruiting
Clinical Study of Bcl-2 Inhibitors Combined With Azacytidine and Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients With Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT05053425]30 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-20Recruiting
A Single-arm, Multicenter, Prospective Clinical Study of Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride Liposome Injection Combined With Chidamide and Azacitidine in the Treatment of Relapsed and Refractory Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma [NCT05495100]Phase 245 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-11Recruiting
Randomized Phase II Trial of Adjuvant Combined Epigenetic Therapy With 5-Azacitidine and Entinostat in Resected Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Versus Standard Care [NCT01207726]Phase 213 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Slow Accrual due to patients not wanting daily clinic administration of 5AZA and/or 6 months of treatment after surgery.)
A Phase 1/2, Open-label, Multicenter Dose Escalation and Dose Expansion Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Preliminary Efficacy of CC-90011 in Combination With Venetoclax and Azacitidine in R/R Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Treatment-naïve [NCT04748848]Phase 11 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-10-14Terminated(stopped due to Business objectives have changed.)
A Phase 3b, Single-Arm, Multicenter Open-Label Study of Venetoclax in Combination With Azacitidine or Decitabine in an Outpatient Setting in AML Patients Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy [NCT03941964]Phase 360 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-15Completed
A Pilot Study of the Combination of 5-azacitidine (5-AZA) and All-trans Retinoic Acid (ATRA) for Prostate Cancer (PCa) With PSA-only Recurrence After Definitive Local Treatment [NCT03572387]Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-20Completed
A Phase I/II, Multi-center, Dose-escalating Study of the Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Clinical Activity of the Combined Administration of Oral Rigosertib With Azacitidine in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome or Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT01926587]Phase 1/Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
A Phase I/II Study of Nivolumab in Combination With 5-azacytidine in Pediatric Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (BMS Reference CA209-9JY) [NCT03825367]Phase 1/Phase 213 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-29Active, not recruiting
Salsalate + Venetoclax/Decitabine for Patients With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia or Advanced Myelodysplasia/Myeloproliferative Disease [NCT04146038]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-26Completed
Randomized, Sequential, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of IDH Targeted/Non- Targeted Versus Non-targeted/IDH-targeted Approaches in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed IDH Mutated AML Patients Not Candidates for Intensive Induction Therapy (I- DAT [NCT05401097]Phase 2125 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-13Recruiting
Phase Ib/II Study of the Glutaminase Inhibitor CB-839 in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients With Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT03047993]Phase 1/Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-15Completed
A Phase 1B, Open-label, Global, Multicenter, Dose Determination Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, and Preliminary Efficacy of CC-486 (ONUREG®) in Combination Therapy in Subjects With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [NCT04887857]Phase 166 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-01Active, not recruiting
Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of the Dexamethasone, Azacytidine, Pegaspargase, Tislelizumab With NK/T Cell Lymphoma [NCT04899414]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-18Not yet recruiting
A Phase I/II Study of Midostaurin (PKC412) and 5-Azacitidine for Elderly Patients With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia. [NCT01093573]Phase 1/Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
Phase II Randomized Study of Lower Doses of Decitabine (DAC; 20 mg/m2 IV Daily for 3 Days Every Month) Versus Azacitidine (AZA; 75 mg/m2 SC/IV Daily for 3 Days Every Month) in Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Patients With Low and Intermediate-1 Risk Diseas [NCT01720225]Phase 2113 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-06Completed
A Randomized Phase III, Multicentre, Open Label Clinical Trial Comparing Azacitidine Plus Pevonedistat Versus Azacitidine in Older/Unfit Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Ineligible for Standard Induction Chemotherapy [NCT04090736]Phase 3302 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-24Active, not recruiting
Phase I Study of the Hypomethylating Drug SGI-110 Plus Cisplatin in Relapsed Refractory Germ Cell Tumors [NCT02429466]Phase 114 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-27Completed
A Phase 1 Study of Doxorubicin, CC-486 (5-azacitidine), Romidepsin, and Duvelisib (hARD) for T-cell Lymphoma [NCT04639843]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-11-03Withdrawn(stopped due to Safety issues with PI3 kinase inhibitors)
Azacitidine Plus Lenalidomide Combination in Elderly Patients With Previously Treated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) & High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) (VIREL2 Trial) [NCT01442714]Phase 233 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Lack of efficacy - Inability to meet the primary response endpoint)
A Phase 2 Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Double Blind Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of CC-486 (Oral Azacitidine) in Combination With Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Versus Pembrolizumab Plus Placebo in Subjects With Previously Treated Loca [NCT02546986]Phase 2100 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-09Active, not recruiting
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University [NCT05949762]Phase 1/Phase 245 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-01Recruiting
Phase 3 Multi-center Randomized Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of Azacitidine and Chidamide Combined With CHOP (AC-CHOP) Versus CHOP in Patients With Previously Untreated Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma With T-follicular Helper Phenotype (PTCL-TFH) [NCT05678933]Phase 3200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-01Enrolling by invitation
An Open Label, Single Arm, Phase I/II in the Combination of Azacytidine, Bendamustine and Piamprizumab in Refractory/Relapsed B-cell Non-Hodgkin's [NCT04897477]Phase 1/Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-04-22Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Ambulatory Low-dose Venetoclax and Azacitidne as First Line Therapy in Newly Diagnosed AML: a Pilot Study [NCT05048615]Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-07-26Completed
A Phase 1b/2 Study of Entospletinib (GS-9973) Monotherapy and in Combination With Chemotherapy in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [NCT02343939]Phase 1/Phase 2148 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-01Terminated
Clinical Study Protocol of Venetoclax Combined With Azacitidine and Harringtonine in the Treatment of Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT05513131]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-30Recruiting
Phase 1b Trial of the Combination of Ibrutinib and Azacitidine for the Treatment of Higher Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes in Previously Treated Patients or in Untreated Patients Unfit for or Who Refuse Intense Therapy [NCT02553941]Phase 121 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-17Completed
A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Oral Azacitidine in Japanese Subjects With Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT01571648]Phase 15 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-01Completed
Phase II Randomised Trial of 5-azacitidine Versus 5-azacitidine in Combination With Vorinostat in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukaemia or High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy [NCT01617226]Phase 2260 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
A Phase II Trial of Revlimid® (Lenalidomide) and Low Dose Vidaza® (Azacitidine) in Patients With Low - Intermediate-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT01379274]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Loss of funding.)
A Phase 3 Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Study of ASP2215 (Gilteritinib), Combination of ASP2215 Plus Azacitidine and Azacitidine Alone in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia With FLT3 Mutation in Patients Not Eligible for Intensi [NCT02752035]Phase 3183 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-01Active, not recruiting
A Phase I Study of PXD101 in Combination With Azacitidine (5-Aza) for Advanced Hematologic Malignancies [NCT00351975]Phase 156 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
An Open-label Phase 1b Study of PF-04449913 (Glasdegib) in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients With Previously Untreated Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia [NCT02367456]Phase 173 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-28Completed
A Phase II Study Examining the Use of Deferasirox, Cholecalciferol, and Azacitidine in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) in Elderly Patients [NCT02341495]Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Study was terminated early due to low patient accrual.)
A Phase I Study of PLX51107 (A Novel Bromodomain Inhibitor) in Combination With Azacytidine for Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [NCT04022785]Phase 143 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-09Completed
Phase II Study of Pacritinib for Patients With Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT02469415]Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Terminated(stopped due to FDA Clinical Hold)
A Phase 2, Randomized, Open-label, Two-arm Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of the Epigenetic Modifying Effects of CC-486 (Oral Azacitidine) in Combination With Fulvestrant in Postmenopausal Women With ER+, HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer Who Have P [NCT02374099]Phase 297 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-13Terminated
A Phase I Study of SGI-110 Combined With Irinotecan Followed by a Randomized Phase II Study of SGI-110 Combined With Irinotecan Versus Regorafenib or TAS-102 in Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients [NCT01896856]Phase 1/Phase 2118 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-23Completed
An Open Label Phase I Dose Escalation Trial to Investigate the Maximum Tolerated Dose, Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Intravenous Volasertib in Combination With Subcutaneous Azacitidine in Patients With Previously Untreated High-risk Myelodyspla [NCT01957644]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-06Terminated
Sequential Treatment With Azacitidine and Lenalidomide for Relapsed and Refractory Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT01743859]Phase 237 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-06Completed
A Phase II Study of Risk-adapted Donor Lymphocyte Infusion and Azacitidine for the Prevention of Hematologic Malignancy Relapse Following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT02458235]Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-02Completed
An Open Label Phase I Trial of Intravenous Volasertib in Combination With Subcutaneous Azacitidine in Japanese Patients With Higher-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia [NCT02201329]Phase 15 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Completed
Phase II Combination of Lirilumab and Nivolumab With 5-Azacitidine in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) [NCT02599649]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-21Terminated(stopped due to Enrollment was stopped after the sponsor's decision not to pursue the development of lirilumab for myeloid malignancies.)
A Phase Ib Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of IBI188 in Combination With Azacitidine in Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Higher Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT04485065]Phase 1120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-30Suspended(stopped due to Suspended for changes in development strategy)
An Open Label Phase II Trial of Guadecitabine and Pembrolizumab in Platinum Resistant Recurrent Ovarian Cancer [NCT02901899]Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase I/II Multicenter Study Combining Guadecitabine, a DNA Methyltransferase Inhibitor, With Atezolizumab, an Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor, in Patients With Intermediate or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia [NCT02935361]Phase 1/Phase 233 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-02Active, not recruiting
Phase II Randomized Study of Lower Doses of Decitabine (DAC; 20 mg/m2 IV Daily for 3 Days Every Month) Versus Azacitidine (AZA; 75 mg/m2 SC/IV Daily for 3 Days Every Month) Versus Azacitidine (AZA; 75 mg/m2 SC/IV Daily for 5 Days Every Month) in MDS Patie [NCT02269280]Phase 2268 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-13Active, not recruiting
An Open-Label Phase II Study of Lirilumab (BMS-986015) in Combination With 5-Azacytidine (Vidaza) for the Treatment of Patients With Refractory/Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT02399917]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-20Terminated(stopped due to This study was terminated early due to response rates not meeting the anticipated minimum of 30%.)
A Phase 1/2, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation, Safety and Tolerability Study of INCB052793 in Subjects With Advanced Malignancies [NCT02265510]Phase 1/Phase 283 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-10Terminated
A Phase 4 Study of Venetoclax in Combination With Azacitidine in Newly Diagnosed Subjects With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy in China [NCT05144243]Phase 444 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-01-06Active, not recruiting
Phase 3 Randomized Trial of DFP-10917 vs Non-Intensive Reinduction (LoDAC, Azacitidine, Decitabine, Venetoclax Combination Regimens) or Intensive Reinduction (High & Intermediate Dose Cytarabine Regimens) for Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Patients in Second, [NCT03926624]Phase 3450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-11-22Recruiting
A Single Arm Phase II Trial of Maintenance Low Dose 5'-Azacitidine Post T Cell Depleted Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myelogenous Leukemia With High Risk for Post-Transplant Relapse [NCT01995578]Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
An Open-Label Phase Ib/II Study of Avelumab in Combination With 5-Azacytidine (Vidaza) for the Treatment of Patients With Refractory/Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT02953561]Phase 1/Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-20Terminated(stopped due to PDOL request)
A Biomarker-Directed Phase 2 Trial of SY-1425, a Selective Retinoic Acid Receptor Alpha Agonist, in Adult Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) [NCT02807558]Phase 2155 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-31Active, not recruiting
A 2-year, Multi-center, Phase II, Open-label, Fixed-dose, Randomized Comparative Trial of Azacitidine, With or Without Deferasirox in Patients With Higher Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT02159040]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-11Terminated
A Phase 1/2, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation/Dose-Expansion, Safety and Tolerability Study of INCB057643 in Subjects With Advanced Malignancies [NCT02711137]Phase 1/Phase 2137 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-18Terminated(stopped due to Study terminated due to safety issues.)
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase III, Multi-centre Study of Eltrombopag or Placebo in Combination With Azacitidine in Subjects With IPSS Intermediate-1, Intermediate 2 and High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) SUPPORT: A StUdy of [NCT02158936]Phase 3356 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-10Terminated
A Phase 2, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label, Clinical Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Pevonedistat Plus Azacitidine Versus Single-Agent Azacitidine in Patients With Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia and Low-Blast [NCT02610777]Phase 2120 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-14Completed
Phase I/Ib Trial of COmbined 5'aZacitidine and Carboplatin for Recurrent/Refractory Pediatric Brain and Solid Tumors [NCT03206021]Phase 131 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-01Active, not recruiting
Epigenetic Modification for Relapse Prevention: a Dose-finding Study of Vorinostat Used in Combination With Low-dose Azacitidine in Children Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Myeloid Malignancies [NCT03843528]Phase 115 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-05-01Recruiting
A Phase 1/2 Study of Vadastuximab Talirine (SGN-CD33A) in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients With Previously Untreated International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) Intermediate-2 or High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) [NCT02706899]Phase 1/Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-29Terminated(stopped due to Sponsor decision based on portfolio prioritization)
Phase I-II Study of Crenolanib Combined With Standard Salvage Chemotherapy, and Crenolanib Combined With 5-Azacitidine in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients With FLT3 Activating Mutations [NCT02400281]Phase 1/Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
T-cell Lymphoma Series:A Genotype-guided Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Patients With Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (THEORY Study) [NCT05675813]Phase 1/Phase 2264 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-15Not yet recruiting
Azacitidine in Combination With Venetoclax Treatment for Prevention of Relapse in MRD Positive Post Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Acute Myelogenous Leukemia/ Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patients [NCT04809181]Phase 295 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-19Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Tislelizumab Combined Treatment in Refractory Natural Killer/T-cell Lymphoma [NCT05058755]62 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-17Recruiting
A Phase 1/2 Study of Evorpacept (ALX148) in Combination With Venetoclax and Azacitidine in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) (ASPEN-05) [NCT04755244]Phase 1/Phase 297 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-05Active, not recruiting
A Phase 1/2 Study of Evorpacept (ALX148) in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients With Higher Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) (ASPEN-02) [NCT04417517]Phase 1/Phase 265 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-02Active, not recruiting
Phase I/II Open-Label Study to Assess Safety, Tolerability and Preliminary Efficacy of the CLEVER-1 Antibody Bexmarilimab in Combination With Azacitidine or Azacitidine/Venetoclax in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemi [NCT05428969]Phase 1/Phase 2181 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-02Recruiting
Combination Intraventricular Chemotherapy Pilot Study: 5-Azacytidine (5-AZA) and Trastuzumab Infusions Into the Fourth Ventricle or Resection Cavity in Children and Adults With Recurrent or Residual Posterior Fossa Ependymoma [NCT04958486]Early Phase 110 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-08Recruiting
Infusion of 5-Azacytidine (5-AZA) Into the Fourth Ventricle or Resection Cavity in Children and Adults With Recurrent Posterior Fossa Ependymoma: A Phase I Study [NCT03572530]Phase 19 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-02-08Recruiting
A Phase 1 Study of Milademetan (DS 3032b), an Oral MDM2 Inhibitor, In Dose Escalation as a Single Agent and In Dose Escalation/Expansion In Combination With 5 Azacitidine In Subjects With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) or High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndr [NCT02319369]Phase 174 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-25Terminated(stopped due to This study was terminated based on a business decision by the Sponsor.)
A Single-center, Single-arm Clinical Study of the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of CD47 Monoclonal Antibody Combined With Azacitidine in the Treatment of Recurrent AML After Transplantation [NCT05266274]69 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-14Recruiting
A Phase 1/2 Study of Vorinostat (Zolinza®) in Combination With Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (Mylotarg®) and Azacitidine (Vidaza®) in Patients 50 Years of Age and Older With Relapsed/Refractory Non-APL Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [NCT00895934]Phase 1/Phase 252 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
A Phase I/II, Open-Label, Multicentre 2-Part Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of AZD2811 as Monotherapy or in Combination in Treatment-Naïve or Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukaemia Patients Not Eligible for I [NCT03217838]Phase 150 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-31Terminated(stopped due to strategic decision)
Epigenetic Priming With 5-Azacytidine Prior to in Vivo T-cell Depleted Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients With High Risk Myeloid Malignancies in Morphologic Remission [NCT02497404]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-13Completed
Characteristics, Treatment Patterns, and Clinical Outcomes in Non-intensive Chemotherapy Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Patients - a US Real-World Study Using Electronic Medical Record Data [NCT04230564]0 participants (Actual)Observational2020-10-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Study was cancelled prior to any enrollment)
A Phase II Study of Epigenetic Therapy With Azacitidine and Entinostat With Concurrent Nivolumab in Subjects With Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. [NCT01928576]Phase 2101 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-06Completed
A Phase II Study of Azacitidine and Sirolimus for the Treatment of High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome or Acute Myeloid Leukemia Refractory to or Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy [NCT01869114]Phase 257 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-08Active, not recruiting
Treatment With Azacitidine of Recurrent Gliomas With IDH1/2 Mutation [NCT03666559]Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-22Active, not recruiting
An Open-Label Phase 1/2 Multi-Arm Study of DS-1594b as a Single-Agent and in Combination With Azacitidine and Venetoclax or Mini-HCVD for the Treatment of Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) [NCT04752163]Phase 1/Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-25Completed
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of AG-221 (CC-90007) Versus Conventional Care Regimens in Older Subjects With Late Stage Acute Myeloid Leukemia Harboring an Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 2 Mutation [NCT02577406]Phase 3319 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-30Active, not recruiting
Phase II Study of the Combination of 5-azacytidine With Valproic Acid and All-trans Retinoic Acid in Patients With High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myelogenous Leukemia [NCT00326170]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
Efficacy of Concomitant Use of Azacitidine and Homoharringtonine in Children With Juvenile Myelomonocytic Leukemia [NCT04505995]30 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-01Recruiting
A Randomized, Open-label, Controlled, Phase 2 Study of Pevonedistat, Venetoclax, and Azacitidine Versus Venetoclax Plus Azacitidine in Adults With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Unfit for Intensive Chemotherapy [NCT04266795]Phase 2164 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-13Active, not recruiting
Phase II Study of Oral Azacitidine (CC-486) in Combination With Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma [NCT02816021]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-14Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Trial to Improve Outcomes in Patients With Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma at High Risk for Recurrence Using Epigenetic Therapy [NCT01845805]Phase 249 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-10Completed
A Study of Combination of Venetoclax, Hypomethylation Agent and Low-dose Cytarabine as a Salvage Therapy in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Had Relapsed/Refractory Disease or Positive Minimal Residual Disease [NCT05362942]Phase 252 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-01Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Phase II Trial of Cytotoxic Chemotherapy With or Without Epigenetic Priming in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT01935947]Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Terminated
Phase I/II Study of 5-azacitidine in Combination With Vorinostat in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory DLBCL [NCT01120834]Phase 1/Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
Treatment of Post-Transplant Relapse and Persistent Disease in Patients With MDS, CMML and AML With Azacitidine [NCT01083706]Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial of Venetoclax, Azacytidine Combined With Chidamide for the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Monocytic Leukemia Patients That Are Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy [NCT05566054]Phase 292 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-01Recruiting
A Phase 1, Open-label, Dose Finding Study of CC-95251 Alone and in Combination With Antineoplastic Agents in Subjects With Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT05168202]Phase 1218 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-19Recruiting
A Phase 1b/2, Open-label Clinical Study to Determine Preliminary Safety and Efficacy of Alvocidib When Administered in Sequence After Decitabine or Azacitidine in Patients With MDS [NCT03593915]Phase 1/Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-29Terminated(stopped due to The sponsor decided not to continue the study based on the overall company strategy in AML.)
Venetoclax Combining Chidamide and Azacitidine (VCA) Regimen Followed by Dicitabine Combined With Liposome Mitoxantrone, Cytarabine, and G-CSF (D-MAG) Regimen on the Treatment of Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) : A Multi [NCT05603884]Phase 266 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-01Recruiting
Phase II Study of Tagraxofusp in Newly Diagnosed Secondary AML After Previous Exposure to Hypomethylating Agents [NCT05442216]Phase 253 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-31Not yet recruiting
A Phase 2 Multi-Arm Study of Magrolimab Combinations in Patients With Myeloid Malignancies [NCT04778410]Phase 259 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-28Active, not recruiting
Phase I, Dose De-Escalation to Minimal Effective Pharmacologic Dose Trial of Sodium Phenylbutyrate (PB, NSC 657802) in Combination With 5-Azacytidine (5-AZA, NSC 102816) in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [NCT00004871]Phase 10 participants Interventional2000-05-31Completed
Phase II Study of Sorafenib Plus 5-Azacitidine for the Initial Therapy of Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia and High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome With FLT3-ITD Mutation [NCT02196857]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-06Completed
A Phase II Study of Efficacy and Tolerance of Azacitidine (AZA) In MDS-associated Steroid Dependent/Refractory Systemic Auto-immune and Inflammatory Disorders (SAID) [NCT02985190]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-26Completed
A Phase Ib Study of the Safety and Pharmacology of Atezolizumab (Anti-PD-L1 Antibody) Administered Alone or in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT02508870]Phase 146 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
A Phase 2 Study of FF-10501-01 in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT03486353]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Program terminated)
A Phase I Clinical Trial of NY-ESO-1 Protein Immunization in Combination With 5-AZA-2'-Deoxycytidine (Decitabine) in Patients Receiving Liposomal Doxorubicin for Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian or Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma [NCT01673217]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
A Prospective, Multicenter, Phase III, Non-randomized Study of Tucidinostat, Azacitidine Combined With CHOP Versus CHOP in Patients With Untreated Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma [NCT05075460]Phase 3107 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-01Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Phase II Study of CHO(E)P vs CC-486-CHO(E)P vs Duvelisib-CHO(E)P in Previously Untreated CD30 Negative Peripheral T-Cell Lymphomas [NCT04803201]Phase 2170 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-30Recruiting
A Randomized Phase II Study Comparing Cytarabine + Daunorubicin (7 + 3) to (Daunorubicin and Cytarabine) Liposome, Cytarabine + Daunorubicin + Venetoclax, and Azacitidine + Venetoclax in Patients Aged 59 or Younger With High-Risk (Adverse) Acute Myeloid L [NCT05554406]Phase 2268 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-02-01Not yet recruiting
Treatment of Patients With MDS or AML With an Impending Hematological Relapse With Azacitidine (Vidaza) [NCT01462578]Phase 293 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
Phase I- II Study of in Vivo Regulatory T Cell Enhancement With Cyclophosphamide and Sirolimus With or Without Vidaza (Azacitidine) for the Treatment of Steroid-refractory Acute Graft-versus-host Disease [NCT01453140]Phase 1/Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Dose Limiting Toxicities)
A Pilot/Safety Study of sEphB4-HSA in Combination With a Hypomethylating Agent (HMA) for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and AML Previously Treated With a Hypomethylating Agent [NCT03146871]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-20Terminated(stopped due to Lack of funding)
A Phase 2, Randomized, Open-Label Study of Azacitidine (Vidaza) vs MGCD0103 vs Azacitidine in Combination With MGCD0103 for the Treatment of Elderly Subjects With Newly Diagnosed AML or Intermediate-2 or High-Risk MDS [NCT00666497]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Celgene terminated its collaboration agreement with MethylGene for the development of MGCD0103. All Celgene-sponsored trials with MGCD0103 with be closed.)
Venetoclax Plus Azacitidine Versus Standard Intensive Chemotherapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and NPM1 Mutations Eligible for Intensive Treatment [NCT05904106]Phase 2146 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-31Not yet recruiting
A Phase 1 Study of Cusatuzumab Plus Azacitidine in Japanese Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia or High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome Who Are Not Candidates for Intensive Treatment [NCT04241549]Phase 16 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-03-25Completed
A Phase 2 Study of Cusatuzumab Plus Azacitidine in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Not Candidates for Intensive Chemotherapy [NCT04023526]Phase 2103 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-07-29Active, not recruiting
A Single-arm Dose Finding Phase Ib Multicenter Study of the Oral Smoothened Antagonist LDE255 in Combination With Azacitidine for High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patients [NCT02323139]Phase 123 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-10Completed
A Phase 1/2, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation/Dose-Expansion, Safety and Tolerability Study of INCB059872 in Subjects With Advanced Malignancies [NCT02712905]Phase 1/Phase 2116 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-05Terminated(stopped due to Strategic Business Decision)
Phase 1/2a Study of Anti-PD-L1 Monoclonal Antibody Durvalumab in Combination With Pralatrexate and Romidepsin, Oral 5-Aza and Romidepsin, Romidepsin Alone, or Oral 5-Azacitidine for Treatment of Patients With Relapsed and Refractory PTCL [NCT03161223]Phase 1/Phase 2148 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-05-30Recruiting
Master Screening and Reassessment Protocol (MSRP) for the NCI MyeloMATCH Clinical Trials [NCT05564390]Phase 2750 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-02-01Not yet recruiting
A Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) Driven, Phase II Study of Venetoclax Plus Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Younger Patients With Intermediate Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Tier 1 MYELOMATCH Clinical Trial [NCT05554393]Phase 2153 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-31Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Atezolizumab (MPDL3280A), SGI-110 and CDX-1401 Vaccine in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer [NCT03206047]Phase 1/Phase 275 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-11-08Active, not recruiting
A Phase I Trial of 5Azacitidine and Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid in Patients With Metastatic or Locally Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma and Nasal NK-T Cell Lymphoma [NCT00336063]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-03Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3, Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized Study of SKLB1028 Versus Salvage Chemotherapy in Patients With FLT3-mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia Refractory to or Relapsed After First-line Treatment(ALIVE) [NCT04716114]Phase 3315 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-24Recruiting
Azacitidine (AZA) Combined With N-Acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) for Prolonged Isolated Thrombocytopenia (PIT) After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) [NCT05126004]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-01Not yet recruiting
Phase I Trial of OPB-111077 in Combination With Decitabine and Venetoclax for the Treatment of AML Refractory to or Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy [NCT03063944]Phase 137 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-17Active, not recruiting
OAG and Decitabine for Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Greater Than or Equal to 65 Years of Age [NCT02029417]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Major revisions needed in study)
Phase I/II Study of SP-2577 (Seclidemstat) in Combination With Azacitidine for Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia [NCT04734990]Phase 1/Phase 244 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-07Recruiting
A Phase I/II Study of Azacitidine, Venetoclax, and Gilteritinib for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome With an Activating FLT3 Mutation [NCT04140487]Phase 1/Phase 242 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-12-17Recruiting
Evaluation of Cytidine Deaminase for Patient Suffering of a Myelodysplasic Syndrom or an Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Treated by Azacytidine [NCT02489929]35 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-08-31Not yet recruiting
A Single-arm, Multi-Center, Phase Ib/Ⅱ Clinical Trial of Max-40279-01 in Combination With Azacitidine (AZA) in Adult Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) or Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (R/R AML) [NCT05061147]Phase 1/Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-16Recruiting
Phase-II Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide in Addition to 5-Azacitidine and Donor Lymphocyte Infusions (DLI) for the Treatment of Patients With MDS, CMML or AML Who Relapse After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT02472691]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Completed
A PHASE 1 STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, EFFICACY, PHARMACOKINETICS, AND PHARMACODYNAMICS OF PF-04449913 (GLASDEGIB), AN ORAL HEDGEHOG INHIBITOR, ADMINISTERED AS A SINGLE AGENT IN JAPANESE PATIENTS WITH SELECT HEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCIES AND IN [NCT02038777]Phase 148 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-25Active, not recruiting
Action of the Vidaza on the Atrial Fibrillation [NCT03298321]14 participants (Anticipated)Observational2018-12-20Recruiting
Prognostic Factors and the Impact of Various Management of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Real Life Condition at Toulouse and Bordeaux University Hospital [NCT03284593]199 participants (Actual)Observational2014-12-31Active, not recruiting
Phase I/II Trial of Intravenous Azacitidine in Patients Undergoing Matched Unrelated Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT01747499]Phase 1/Phase 254 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-15Terminated(stopped due to Enrolling 8 more patients would be statistically unlikely that the primary endpoint would be reached (reduce day 180 grade II-IV GVHD rates to 20% or less))
Phase II Study of Decitabine in Patients With Metastatic Papillary Thyroid Cancer or Follicular Thyroid Cancer Unresponsive to Radioiodine [NCT00085293]Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-05-31Completed
A Multi-Center, Phase 1 Trial of Combining Anti-CD47 Antibody (Magrolimab) With Azacitidine as Post-Transplant Maintenance Therapy in Patients Who Underwent Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Treatment of High-Risk AML or MDS [NCT05823480]Phase 144 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-09Not yet recruiting
Clinical Study of Azacitidine Combined With Homoharringtonie Based Regimens in Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT04248595]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-12-01Recruiting
A Phase I-II, Multicentre, Open Label Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of the Combination of Low-dose Cytarabine or Azacitidine, Plus Venetoclax and Quizartinib in Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Aged Equal or More Than [NCT04687761]Phase 1/Phase 284 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-04Recruiting
Azacitidine/Vorinostat/GemBuMel With Autologous Stem-Cell Transplant (SCT) in Patients With Refractory Lymphomas [NCT01983969]Phase 1/Phase 261 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-07Completed
Decitabine Followed by Bone Marrow Transplant and High-Dose Cyclophosphamide for the Treatment of Relapsed and Refractory Acute Myeloid Neoplasms [NCT01707004]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-16Completed
A Phase 2, Multicenter, International, Single Arm Study To Assess The Safety And Efficacy Of Single Agent Cc-486 (Oral Azacitidine) In Previously Treated Subjects With Locally Advanced Or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma [NCT02269943]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-13Completed
A Phase 2, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Subcutaneous Azacitidine in Adult Chinese Subjects With Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT01599325]Phase 272 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-24Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00071799 (16) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Median Time to Transformation to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Occurred First
NCT00071799 (16) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Median Time to Transformation to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
NCT00071799 (16) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Median Time to Transformation to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Based on the Last Bone Marrow Assessment
NCT00071799 (16) [back to overview]Number of Infections Per Treatment Year Requiring Intravenous Antibiotics, Antifungals or Antivirals
NCT00071799 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Died
NCT00071799 (16) [back to overview]Time to Disease Progression, Relapse After Complete or Partial Remission, or Death From Any Cause
NCT00071799 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants Considered Hematologic Responders by Investigator Determinations Using International Working Group (IWG 2000) Criteria for Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)
NCT00071799 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants in Different Categories of Adverse Experiences During Core Study Period
NCT00071799 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants Showing Hematologic Improvement Using International Working Group (IWG 2000) Criteria for Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Assessed by Independent Review Committee
NCT00071799 (16) [back to overview]Summary of Participants' Platelet Transfusion Status for Participants Who Were Transfusion Dependent at Baseline
NCT00071799 (16) [back to overview]Summary of Participants' Platelet Transfusion Status for Participants Who Were Transfusion Independent at Baseline
NCT00071799 (16) [back to overview]Summary of Participants' Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Status for Participants Who Were Transfusion Dependent at Baseline
NCT00071799 (16) [back to overview]Summary of Participants' Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Status for Participants Who Were Transfusion Independent at Baseline
NCT00071799 (16) [back to overview]Duration of Any Hematologic Improvement
NCT00071799 (16) [back to overview]Summary of Subgroup Analyses for Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Death From Any Cause
NCT00071799 (16) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Median Time to Death From Any Cause
NCT00085293 (2) [back to overview]Frequency of Adverse Events According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0
NCT00085293 (2) [back to overview]Restoration of Radioiodine Uptake in Metastatic Lesions as Demonstrated by Diagnostic Whole-body Scanning After Decitabine Administration
NCT00102687 (19) [back to overview]Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Status at Baseline and End of Maintenance Study Period (24 Months)
NCT00102687 (19) [back to overview]Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Status at Baseline and End of Initial Study Period (6 Months)
NCT00102687 (19) [back to overview]Platelet Transfusion Status at Baseline and End of Maintenance Study Period (24 Months)
NCT00102687 (19) [back to overview]Platelet Transfusion Status at Baseline and End of Initial Study Period (6 Months)
NCT00102687 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Best Hematological Improvement Derived Using International Working Group 2000 (IWG 2000) Criteria for MDS During the Initial Study Period.
NCT00102687 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Improved or Maintained The Hematologic Response From the Initial Study Period (Based on IWG 2000 Criteria For MDS) During the Maintenance Period
NCT00102687 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants In Best Hematological Response Categories as Determined by the Investigator Using International Working Group 2000 (IWG 2000) Criteria For Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) During the Initial Study Period.
NCT00102687 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Overall Best Hematologic Response and Hematologic Improvement Based on IWG 2000 Criteria For MDS During the Initial Study Period
NCT00102687 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Number of Infections Requiring Treatment With IV Antibiotics Per Treatment Cycle (28 Days) for the Maintenance Study Period
NCT00102687 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Number of Infections Requiring Treatment With IV Antibiotics Per Treatment Cycle (28 Days) for the Initial Study Period
NCT00102687 (19) [back to overview]Baseline Platelet Values
NCT00102687 (19) [back to overview]Baseline Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) Values
NCT00102687 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Platelets at the End of Initial Study Period (6 Months)
NCT00102687 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Platelets at the End of the Maintenance Study Period (Month 24)
NCT00102687 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at the End of the Maintenance Study Period
NCT00102687 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at End of Initial Study Period (6 Months)
NCT00102687 (19) [back to overview]Baseline Hemoglobin Values
NCT00102687 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) at the End of the Maintenance Study Period (Month 24)
NCT00102687 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) at the End of Initial Study Period (6 Months)
NCT00313586 (1) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With Clinical Response
NCT00321711 (4) [back to overview]Platelet Transfusion
NCT00321711 (4) [back to overview]Occurrence of a Clinically Significant Thrombocytopenic Event
NCT00321711 (4) [back to overview]Hypomethylating Agent Dose Reduction and Delay Due to Thrombocytopenia
NCT00321711 (4) [back to overview]Achieving an Overall Response (Complete or Partial Response, CR or PR) at the End of the Treatment Period
NCT00326170 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Response
NCT00352001 (8) [back to overview]PHASE II: Determine the Number of Patients With Responses for Efficacy(Measured as Response Rate)
NCT00352001 (8) [back to overview]Number of Patients That Experience Grade 3 or 4 Treatment Related Non-hematologic Adverse Events
NCT00352001 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival Among Patients With Complete Response
NCT00352001 (8) [back to overview]PHASE I: Maximum Tolerated Dose of Azacitidine
NCT00352001 (8) [back to overview]PHASE I: Maximum Tolerated Dose of Lenalidomide
NCT00352001 (8) [back to overview]PHASE II: Determine the Number of Patients With Responses for Efficacy(Measured as Response Rate)
NCT00352001 (8) [back to overview]Time to Relapse After Achieving Complete Response
NCT00352001 (8) [back to overview]Time to Transformation to Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Death
NCT00379912 (6) [back to overview]Analysis of CD34, CD71, CD36 Cells in Aspirated Bone Marrow for Both Responders and Non-responders at Baseline and After Three and Six Cycles
NCT00379912 (6) [back to overview]Overall Response After Cycle 3
NCT00379912 (6) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate After Six Cycles
NCT00379912 (6) [back to overview]Safety Profile of the Modified Dose/Schedule of Azacitidine and Erythropoietin or a Modified Dose of Azacitidine Alone
NCT00379912 (6) [back to overview]BclXL Expression
NCT00379912 (6) [back to overview]Percent Apoptosis in 34+36+71+ Cells at Baseline, Three Cycles and Six Cycles
NCT00381693 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events
NCT00381693 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00381693 (3) [back to overview]Patients With Confirmed Response (Complete Remission or Partial Remission on 2 Consecutive Evaluation at Least 4 Weeks Apart) During the First 4 Months of Treatment
NCT00382590 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Response
NCT00384839 (6) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate by Recist (ORR)
NCT00384839 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With PSA Doubling Time >=3 Months.
NCT00384839 (6) [back to overview]Changes in Fetal Hemoglobin (HbF) With Time.
NCT00384839 (6) [back to overview]1-year Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00384839 (6) [back to overview]PSA Response Rate
NCT00384839 (6) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00384956 (7) [back to overview]Rate of Overall Survival
NCT00384956 (7) [back to overview]Time to Best Response
NCT00384956 (7) [back to overview]Rate of Complete Remission (CR) and Partial Remission (PR)
NCT00384956 (7) [back to overview]Rate of Transfusion Independence
NCT00384956 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT00384956 (7) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00384956 (7) [back to overview]Rate of Hematologic Improvement
NCT00387465 (9) [back to overview](Phase I) Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Azacitidine When Given Together With Entinostat as Determined by Number of Participants Experiencing Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT)
NCT00387465 (9) [back to overview]Effect of Entinostat and Azacitidine on DNA Methylation and Response
NCT00387465 (9) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00387465 (9) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic Profile of Azacitidine as Measured by AUC (ng*hr/mL)
NCT00387465 (9) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic Profile of Azacytidine as Measured by Tmax
NCT00387465 (9) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic Profile of Azacitidine as Measured by Cmax
NCT00387465 (9) [back to overview]Average Steady State Trough Concentration (ng/mL) of Entinostat
NCT00387465 (9) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00387465 (9) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic Profile of Azacitidine as Measured by Half-life
NCT00387647 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT00387647 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00387647 (3) [back to overview]Rate of Disease Free Survival at One Year
NCT00413478 (1) [back to overview]Tumor Response Rate (Complete, Partial) of Azacytidine
NCT00439673 (2) [back to overview]The Primary Objective of the Trial is to Assess the Efficacy of the Combined Use of Valproic Acid (VPA) in Combination With 5-Azacytidine (5-Aza C) in the Treatment of MDS.
NCT00439673 (2) [back to overview]Time to Transformation to AML
NCT00443261 (1) [back to overview]Evaluate the Safety and Toxicity of Azacitidine (5-azacytidine, Vidaza®) and Cisplatin Combination
NCT00492401 (2) [back to overview]Measurement of DNMT Protein in Peripheral Blood or Bone Marrow Cells
NCT00492401 (2) [back to overview]Rate of Complete Remission
NCT00503984 (8) [back to overview]Phase I - Recommended Phase Two Dose (RPTD) of Azacitidine and Docetaxel in Combination With Prednisone. (Prednisone)
NCT00503984 (8) [back to overview]Phase I - Recommended Phase Two Dose (RPTD) of Azacitidine and Docetaxel in Combination With Prednisone. (Azacitidine and Docetaxel)
NCT00503984 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (CR) to Protocol Therapy.
NCT00503984 (8) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT00503984 (8) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00503984 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00503984 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events After Beginning Protocol Therapy.
NCT00503984 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response.
NCT00569010 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complete Remission
NCT00569660 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Objective Clinical Response
NCT00652626 (17) [back to overview]Apparent Total Clearance of Azacitidine (CL/F)
NCT00652626 (17) [back to overview]Apparent Volume of Distribution of Azacitidine (Vz/F)
NCT00652626 (17) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Time Point
NCT00652626 (17) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration of Azacitidine (Cmax)
NCT00652626 (17) [back to overview]Terminal Phase Half-life of Azacitidine (t½)
NCT00652626 (17) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration of Azacitidine (Tmax)
NCT00652626 (17) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity After Single and Multiple Doses of Azacitidine
NCT00652626 (17) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration of Azacitidine (Cmax) After Single and Multiple Doses of Azacitidine
NCT00652626 (17) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 8 Hours Post-dose After Single and Multiple Doses of Azacitidine
NCT00652626 (17) [back to overview]Apparent Volume of Distribution of Azacitidine (Vz/F) After Single and Multiple Doses of Azacitidine
NCT00652626 (17) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Last Quantifiable Time Point After Single and Multiple Doses of Azacitidine
NCT00652626 (17) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 8 Hours Post-dose
NCT00652626 (17) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity
NCT00652626 (17) [back to overview]Terminal Phase Half-life of Azacitidine (t½) After Single and Multiple Doses of Azacitidine
NCT00652626 (17) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration of Azacitidine (Tmax) After Single and Multiple Doses of Azacitidine
NCT00652626 (17) [back to overview]Apparent Total Clearance of Azacitidine (CL/F) After Single and Multiple Doses of Azacitidine
NCT00652626 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT00658814 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Grade 3 Through 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drug
NCT00658814 (4) [back to overview]30-Day Survival
NCT00658814 (4) [back to overview]Complete Response
NCT00658814 (4) [back to overview]Relapse-free Survival
NCT00660400 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00660400 (4) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT00660400 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Proceed to Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT)
NCT00660400 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Relapse-free Survival (RFS)
NCT00661726 (12) [back to overview]Change in Platelet Count From Baseline to Peak (the Follow-up Time Point With the Highest Value)
NCT00661726 (12) [back to overview]Change in Erythropoietin Levels From Baseline to Nadir (the Follow-up Time Point With the Lowest Value)
NCT00661726 (12) [back to overview]Change in Absolute Reticulocyte Count From Baseline to Nadir (the Follow-up Time Point With the Lowest Value)
NCT00661726 (12) [back to overview]Change in Absolute Fetal Hemoglobin (HbF) From Baseline to Peak (the Follow-up Time Point With the Highest Value)
NCT00661726 (12) [back to overview]Change in Indirect Bilirubin From Baseline to Nadir (the Follow-up Time Point With the Lowest Value)
NCT00661726 (12) [back to overview]Change in Neutrophil Counts From Baseline to Nadir (the Follow-up Time Point With the Lowest Value)
NCT00661726 (12) [back to overview]Change in Percentage of Annexin-positive Cells From Baseline to Nadir (the Follow-up Time Point With the Lowest Value)
NCT00661726 (12) [back to overview]Change in Total Hemoglobin (Hb) From Baseline to Peak (the Follow-up Time Point With the Highest Value)
NCT00661726 (12) [back to overview]Change in Percentage of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Hb Concentration From Baseline to Peak (the Follow-up Time Point With the Highest Value)
NCT00661726 (12) [back to overview]Change in Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) From Baseline to Nadir (the Follow-up Time Point With the Lowest Value)
NCT00661726 (12) [back to overview]Change in Red Blood Cell (RBC) Deformability From Baseline to Peak (the Follow-up Time Point With the Highest Value)
NCT00661726 (12) [back to overview]Number of Evaluable Patients With an Increase From Baseline in Hemoglobin (Hb) of ≥1.5 g/dL
NCT00721214 (8) [back to overview]Two-year Event-free Survival From Time of Treatment Initiation With 5-Azacytidine for All Study Cohorts
NCT00721214 (8) [back to overview]One Year Event Free Survival (EFS) for Allogeneic Transplant Recipients After Transplantation
NCT00721214 (8) [back to overview]One-year Event-free Survival From Time of Treatment Initiation With 5-Azacytidine for All Study Cohorts
NCT00721214 (8) [back to overview]One-year Overall Survival From Time of Treatment Initiation With 5-Azacytidine for All Study Cohorts
NCT00721214 (8) [back to overview]One Year Overall Survival of Allogeneic Transplant Recipients After Transplantation
NCT00721214 (8) [back to overview]Two Year Overall Survival of Allogeneic Transplant Recipients After Transplantation
NCT00721214 (8) [back to overview]Two Year Event Free Survival (EFS) for Allogeneic Transplant Recipients After Transplantation
NCT00721214 (8) [back to overview]Two-year Overall Survival From Time of Treatment Initiation With 5-Azacytidine for All Study Cohorts.
NCT00748553 (3) [back to overview]Phase I: Percentage of Participants Responding to Treatment
NCT00748553 (3) [back to overview]Phase II: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response Rate (ORR) Measured Using RECIST 1.0 Criteria
NCT00748553 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With ER+ Status
NCT00766116 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Response to the Combination Treatment of Mylotarg With 5-azacitidine
NCT00766116 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities
NCT00813124 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Molecular Response
NCT00887068 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00887068 (2) [back to overview]Relapse-free Survival (RFS)
NCT00890929 (9) [back to overview]Remission Duration
NCT00890929 (9) [back to overview]Time to PR
NCT00890929 (9) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00890929 (9) [back to overview]4-week Survival Rate
NCT00890929 (9) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT00890929 (9) [back to overview]OS of Responders
NCT00890929 (9) [back to overview]Time to CR
NCT00890929 (9) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Lenalidomide
NCT00890929 (9) [back to overview]Compete Remission (CR) Rate
NCT00895934 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complete Remission
NCT00895934 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicity (Phase I)
NCT00895934 (4) [back to overview]Disease Relapse
NCT00895934 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicity After the Vorinostat Dose
NCT00934440 (2) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT00934440 (2) [back to overview]Toxicities by Dose Level
NCT00946647 (10) [back to overview]Clinical Response Other Than Composite Clinical Response for Myeloid Dysplastic Syndromes(MDS)/Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) Patients Per Investigator (Phase Llb)
NCT00946647 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) (Phase lb)
NCT00946647 (10) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP) (Phase Llb)
NCT00946647 (10) [back to overview]Clinical Response Other Than Composite Clinical Response for Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) Patients Per Investigator (Phase Llb)
NCT00946647 (10) [back to overview]Hematologic Improvement (HI) for Myeloid Dysplastic Syndromes(MDS)/Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) Patients Per Investigator (Phase Llb)
NCT00946647 (10) [back to overview]1-year Survival Rate (Phase Llb)
NCT00946647 (10) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) Assessed by Best Overall Response: Participants With AML Per Investigator (Phase Llb)
NCT00946647 (10) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) Assessed by Best Overall Response: Participants With MDS/CMML Per Investigator (Phase Llb)
NCT00946647 (10) [back to overview]Number of Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) (Phase lb)
NCT00946647 (10) [back to overview]Composite Complete Response (Phase Llb)
NCT00948064 (3) [back to overview]Response Rate
NCT00948064 (3) [back to overview]Survival at Day 60
NCT00948064 (3) [back to overview]Survival at Day 60
NCT00997243 (3) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate
NCT00997243 (3) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT00997243 (3) [back to overview]Toxicities of the Combination
NCT01004991 (1) [back to overview]Complete Response
NCT01011283 (2) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR), Defined as Proportion of Patients Having Complete Response (CR) and Marrow Complete Response (mCR) After Completion of 3 Cycles of Study Drug.
NCT01011283 (2) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR), Defined as Proportion of Patients Having Complete Response (CR) and Marrow Complete Response (mCR) After Completion of 6 Cycles of Study Drug.
NCT01016600 (15) [back to overview]Partial Remission Rate (PR)
NCT01016600 (15) [back to overview]Toxicity Profile (Grade 3/4 Toxicities)
NCT01016600 (15) [back to overview]Duration of CR for Complete Responders
NCT01016600 (15) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01016600 (15) [back to overview]Morphologic Leukemia-free State
NCT01016600 (15) [back to overview]Morphologic Complete Remission Rate (CRm)
NCT01016600 (15) [back to overview]Event Free Survival
NCT01016600 (15) [back to overview]Cytogenetic CR (CRc) Rate
NCT01016600 (15) [back to overview]CR With Incomplete Blood Counts Rate
NCT01016600 (15) [back to overview]Response Rate (CRm + CRc + CRi + PR)
NCT01016600 (15) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT01016600 (15) [back to overview]Relapse Free Survival (RFS)
NCT01016600 (15) [back to overview]Phase II Only - Complete Remission Rate (CRm + CRi) in Participants With Untreated AML ≥60 Years of Age
NCT01016600 (15) [back to overview]Phase I Only - Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) as Measured by Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
NCT01016600 (15) [back to overview]Phase I Only - Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)
NCT01038635 (3) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) of Lenalidomide in Combination With 5-azacytidine (5-AZA) in Participants With Leukemia
NCT01038635 (3) [back to overview]Number of Dose Limiting Toxicities for Determining Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Lenalidomide in Combination With 5-azacytidine (5-AZA)
NCT01038635 (3) [back to overview]Overall Response: Number of Participants With CR or CRi Response
NCT01050790 (6) [back to overview]Toxicity as Assessed by NCI CTCAE v3.0
NCT01050790 (6) [back to overview]Progression-free and Overall Survival
NCT01050790 (6) [back to overview]Feasibility to Mobilize and Infuse Autologous Lymphocytes (ALI) After Immunomodulatory Therapy and After Stem Cell Transplant Engraftment
NCT01050790 (6) [back to overview]Time to Progression Post Transplant
NCT01050790 (6) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate at 6 Months
NCT01050790 (6) [back to overview]CTA Expression Before and After Azacitidine Therapy
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue Domain
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue Domain
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue Domain
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU): Number of Inpatient Hospitalizations
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU): Rate of Inpatient Hospitalizations Per Year
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]HRQoL: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnea
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]HRQoL: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnea
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]HRQoL: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnea
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]HRQoL: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnea
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]HRQoL: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status-/Quality of Life Domain
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]HRQoL: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status-/Quality of Life Domain
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]HRQoL: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status-/Quality of Life Domain
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]HRQoL: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Domain
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]HRQoL: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Domain
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]HRQoL: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnea
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]HRU: Number of Participants Receiving Transfusions
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]HRU: Rate of Transfusions Per Patient Year
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Overall Survival
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]HRQoL: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status-/Quality of Life Domain
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Achieved a Cytogenetic Complete Response (CRc-10) as Determined by the IRC.
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]HRQoL: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Domain
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]HRQoL: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Domain
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]HRQoL: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Domain
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]HRQoL: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status-/Quality of Life Domain
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]Duration of Remission Assessed by the IRC Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]Event-free Survival (EFS)
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue Domain
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue Domain
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]One-year Overall Survival Rate
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Morphologic CR + CRi as Determined by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) Based on International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]Relapse-Free Survival (RFS) for Participants Who Achieved a Complete Remission (CR) or Complete Remission With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi)
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]Number of Participants in the Extension Phase With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT01074047 (33) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT01083706 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01083706 (3) [back to overview]Incidence of Grades II-IV Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)
NCT01083706 (3) [back to overview]Rate of Response by IWG Criteria
NCT01093573 (5) [back to overview]Toxicity Profile (Phase II)
NCT01093573 (5) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT01093573 (5) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose of Midostaurin in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (Phase I)
NCT01093573 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hematologic Improvement (Phase I)
NCT01093573 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival (Phase II)
NCT01105377 (2) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT01105377 (2) [back to overview]Confirmed Tumor Response
NCT01120834 (1) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01121757 (4) [back to overview]Overall Response
NCT01121757 (4) [back to overview]Response Predicted by Molecular Signatures Compared to True Response
NCT01121757 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Toxicities
NCT01121757 (4) [back to overview]Overall Response
NCT01155583 (5) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Clinical Benefit and Response According to International Response Criteria
NCT01155583 (5) [back to overview]Phase I: Highest Tolerated Low Dose (HTLD)
NCT01155583 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01155583 (5) [back to overview]Median Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT01155583 (5) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Clinical Benefit and Response According to International Response Criteria
NCT01165996 (7) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With Bone Marrow Evidence of Terminal Differentiation Response to Therapy.
NCT01165996 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients That Experience > Grade 2 Non-hematologic Toxicity by National Cancer Institute (NCI)/Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) v4 Criteria
NCT01165996 (7) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With Pharmacodynamic Evidence of Drug Effect.
NCT01165996 (7) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With Bone Marrow Evidence of Cytotoxicity.
NCT01165996 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Response as Defined by IWG (International Working Group) Criteria for Myelodysplasia
NCT01165996 (7) [back to overview]Cytogenetic Response as Per IWG Criteria
NCT01165996 (7) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With Particular Genetic Abnormalities Detected by Whole Exome Sequencing Correlation With Clinical Response
NCT01168219 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01168219 (3) [back to overview]100-day Mortality
NCT01168219 (3) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT01186939 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants in Different Categories of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events for the Extension Period
NCT01193517 (2) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Azacitidine, and Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (CAPOX)
NCT01193517 (2) [back to overview]Response Rate of Azacitidine, and Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (CAPOX)
NCT01201811 (17) [back to overview]Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F) of Azacitidine
NCT01201811 (17) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC∞) of Azacitidine
NCT01201811 (17) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUCt) of Azacitidine
NCT01201811 (17) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Azacitidine
NCT01201811 (17) [back to overview]Terminal Phase of Half-life (T1/2) of Azacitidine
NCT01201811 (17) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Azacitidine
NCT01201811 (17) [back to overview]Number of Infections (Post-baseline Average) Requiring Intravenous Antibiotics, Anti-fungals, or Antivirals Per 28 Days
NCT01201811 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE)
NCT01201811 (17) [back to overview]Number of Platelet Transfusions by Cycle
NCT01201811 (17) [back to overview]Number of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions by Cycle
NCT01201811 (17) [back to overview]Participants' Platelet Transfusion Status for Participants Who Were Transfusion Dependent at Baseline
NCT01201811 (17) [back to overview]Participants' Platelet Transfusion Status for Participants Who Were Transfusion Independent at Baseline
NCT01201811 (17) [back to overview]Participants' Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Status for Participants Who Were Transfusion Dependent at Baseline
NCT01201811 (17) [back to overview]Participants' Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Status for Participants Who Were Transfusion Independent at Baseline
NCT01201811 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Showing Hematologic Improvement Using International Working Group (IWG Criteria for Hematologic Improvement Cheson 2000) Criteria for Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and Assessed by Sponsor
NCT01201811 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Hematologic Response Using International Working Group (IWG) Criteria for Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and Assessed by Investigator
NCT01201811 (17) [back to overview]Apparent Total Plasma Clearance (CL/F) of Azacitidine
NCT01202877 (2) [back to overview]Overall Response (OR) Within 6 Months
NCT01202877 (2) [back to overview]Participant Best Response Assessed Using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1
NCT01241786 (4) [back to overview]the Rate of Response to the Combination of Azacitidine + Lenalidomide in Select Patients
NCT01241786 (4) [back to overview]The Progression Free Survival of Patients Treated With the Combination of Lenalidomide and Azacitidine
NCT01241786 (4) [back to overview]The Overall Survival of Patients Treated With the Combination of Lenalidomide and Azacitidine
NCT01241786 (4) [back to overview]Assess for Treatment Related Toxicity Following Administration of Lenalidomide/ Azacitidine.
NCT01254890 (2) [back to overview]Phase II: Number of Participants With Response
NCT01254890 (2) [back to overview]Phase I: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Sorafenib Given With Azacitidine
NCT01349959 (8) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT01349959 (8) [back to overview]Confirmed Response Rate (Percentage of Participants With Complete or Partial Response Noted as the Objective Status on Two Consecutive Evaluations at Least 4 Weeks Apart) Assessed by RECIST
NCT01349959 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Change in Gene Methylation Evaluated Using Quantitative Multiple Methylation-specific Polymerase Chain Reaction (QM-MSP)
NCT01349959 (8) [back to overview]Confirmed Response Rate to Azacitidine and Entinostat Plus the Addition of Hormone Therapy
NCT01349959 (8) [back to overview]Clinical Benefit Rate
NCT01349959 (8) [back to overview]Feasibility of the Addition of Hormone Therapy, Evaluated by Calculating the Number of Patients With Disease Progression That go on to Receive Hormonal Therapy
NCT01349959 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Change in Expression of Relevant Genes (e.g., ER Alpha and RAR Beta) Evaluated by Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)
NCT01349959 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01350947 (1) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Complete Hematologic Response (According to IWG 2006 Criteria) in CMML Patients Treated With 5-azacitidine.
NCT01358734 (6) [back to overview]Kaplan Meier Estimates for One Year Survival
NCT01358734 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Second Primary Malignancy
NCT01358734 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01358734 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Alive at One Year
NCT01358734 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With 30-Day Treatment-Related Mortality
NCT01358734 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
NCT01442714 (3) [back to overview]Median Duration of Response
NCT01442714 (3) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01442714 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01453140 (1) [back to overview]Response Rate of Patients With Steroid-refractory Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD) Using Cyclophospahmide and Sirolimus Combined With 3 Variations of Low-dose IL 2 and Low-dose Vidaza.
NCT01522976 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01522976 (5) [back to overview]Relapse-free Survival
NCT01522976 (5) [back to overview]Pre-study Cytogenetic Abnormalities
NCT01522976 (5) [back to overview]Toxicity Rate
NCT01522976 (5) [back to overview]Response Rate (Phase II)
NCT01542684 (1) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Physical Well-Being Component of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An) Endpoints at Cycle 6
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Functional Well-Being Component of the FACT-An Instrument at Cycle 6
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia-Total Score at Cycle 6
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia-General (FACT-G) Summary Scale Within the FACT-An Instrument at Cycle 6
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia Trial Outcome Index (FACT-An TOI) Summary Scale Within the FACT-An Instrument at Cycle 6
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Fatigue-Related Subscale Within the FACT-An Instrument at Cycle 6
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Emotional Well-Being Component of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia Instrument at Cycle 6
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Anemia Subscale Within FACT-An Instrument at Cycle 6
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU): Total Number of Days Hospitalized Due to Any Reason During the Treatment Period
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Duration of RBC Transfusion Reduction for Participants Who Achieved RBC Transfusion Reduction of at Least 4 Units of RBCs for at Least 8 Weeks
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Duration of RBC Transfusion Independence Among Participants Who Achieved RBC Transfusion Independence for at Least 84 Days
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Duration of RBC Transfusion Independence Among Participants Who Achieved RBC Transfusion Independence for at Least 56 Days
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Responses to the Fact-Anemia Item GP-5
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Time to RBC Transfusion Independence for at Least 56 Days Among Participants Who Achieved RBC Transfusion Independence for at Least 56 Days
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Time to RBC Transfusion Independence for at Least 84 Days Among Participants Who Achieved RBC Transfusion Independence for at Least 84 Days
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU): Number of Participants Who Were Hospitalized During the Treatment Period
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Responses to the Fact-Anemia Item GP-5
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Improved, Worsened, or No Change in the European Quality of Life-Five Dimension-Three Level Usual Activities Dimension Responses at Cycle 6
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Responses to the Fact-Anemia Item GP-5
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Improvment (CMI) From Baseline on the Physical Well-Being Domain Within the FACT-An Instrument at Cycle 6
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Improvment (CMI) From Baseline on the Functional Well-Being Domain Within the FACT-An Instrument at Cycle 6
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Improvment (CMI) From Baseline on the Emotional Well-Being Domain Within the FACT-An Instrument at Cycle 6
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Improvment (CMI) From Baseline on the Anemia Subscale Domain Within the FACT-An Instrument at Cycle 6
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Improvment (CMI) From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia-General Subscale Domain Within the FACT-An Instrument at Cycle 6
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Social Well-Being Component of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia Instrument at Cycle 6
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Hematological Improvement Response in Platelets (HI-P) According to 2006 IWG Criteria
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Significant Bleeding Events
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Improvment (CMI) From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia Trial Outcome Index Subscale Domain Within the FACT-An Instrument at Cycle 6
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Time to Platelet Transfusion Independence
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Time to Progression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Among Participants Who Progressed to AML
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Improvment (CMI) From Baseline in the Fatigue Related Symptoms Subscale Domain Within the FACT-An Instrument at Cycle 6
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Improvement (CMI) From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Anemia-Total Score Domain Within the FACT-An Instrument at Cycle 6
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Platelet Transfusion Independence With a Duration of ≥ 8 Weeks (56 Days)
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Progressed to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence for ≥ 84 Days
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence for ≥ 56 Days
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Improved, Worsened, or No Change in the European Quality of Life-Five Dimension-Three Level of Self-Care Dimension Responses at Cycle 6
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Improvment (CMI) From Baseline on the Social Well-Being Domain Within the FACT-An Instrument at Cycle 6
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Hematologic Response According to the 2006 IWG Criteria for MDS
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With an Erythroid Hematological Improvement (HI-E) Response According to 2006 IWG Criteria
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Responses to the Fact-Anemia Item GP-5
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Responses to the Fact-Anemia Item GP-5
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Responses to the Fact-Anemia Item GP-5
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Improved, Worsened, or No Change in the European Quality of Life-Five Dimension-Three Level in the Pain/Discomfort Dimension Responses at Cycle 6
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU): Total Number of Days Hospitalized Per Total Patient-Years
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Improved, Worsened, or No Change in the European Quality of Life-Five Dimension-Three Level in the Anxiety/Depression Dimension Responses at Cycle 6
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Improved, Worsened, or No Change in the European Quality of Life-Five Dimension-Three Level (EQ-5D-3L) Mobility Dimension Responses at Cycle 6
NCT01566695 (49) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Responses to the Fact-Anemia Item GP-5
NCT01599325 (18) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUCt) of Azacitidine
NCT01599325 (18) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC∞) of Azacitidine
NCT01599325 (18) [back to overview]Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F) of Azacitidine
NCT01599325 (18) [back to overview]Apparent Total Plasma Clearance (CL/F) of Azacitidine
NCT01599325 (18) [back to overview]The Number of Units of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions by Cycle
NCT01599325 (18) [back to overview]The Number of Platelet Transfusions by Cycle
NCT01599325 (18) [back to overview]The Number of Units of Platelet Transfusions by Cycle
NCT01599325 (18) [back to overview]The Number of RBC Transfusions by Cycle
NCT01599325 (18) [back to overview]The Number of Infections (Post-baseline Average) Requiring Intravenous (IV) Antibiotics, Anti-fungals, or Antivirals by Cycle
NCT01599325 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Hematologic Response Using IWG Criteria for MDS and Assessed by the Investigator
NCT01599325 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Hematologic Response Based on the International Working Group (IWG) Criteria for Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and Programmatically Assessed by the Sponsor Using Clinically Relevant Data.
NCT01599325 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving a Hematologic Improvement (HI) Based on 2000 IWG Response Criteria for MDS and Programmatically Assessed by the Sponsor Using Clinically Relevant Data.
NCT01599325 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Parent Phase
NCT01599325 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Extension Phase
NCT01599325 (18) [back to overview]Kaplan Meier Estimates for Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01599325 (18) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Azacitidine
NCT01599325 (18) [back to overview]Terminal Phase of Half-life (T1/2) of Azacitidine
NCT01599325 (18) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Azacitidine
NCT01607645 (13) [back to overview]Duration of Thrombocytopenia Defined as Platelet Count Less Than 100,000
NCT01607645 (13) [back to overview]Resistant Disease Defined as Patient Survives at Least 14 Days After Completion of the Last Dose of Induction or Re-induction But Has Persistent Leukemia in Peripheral Blood (PB) or BM
NCT01607645 (13) [back to overview]TRM With Each Course of Decitabine-priming, Idarubicin, and Cytarabine
NCT01607645 (13) [back to overview]Frequency and Severity of Grade 3, 4, and 5 Toxicities With Each Course of Decitabine-priming, Idarubicin, and Cytarabine According to NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version (CTCAE) 4.0
NCT01607645 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Achieved Morphologic CR
NCT01607645 (13) [back to overview]Severe Prolonged Aplasia
NCT01607645 (13) [back to overview]CRMRD- Defined as Morphologic CR Without Evidence of Minimal Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry, Cytogenetics, or Other Known Molecular Biomarkers
NCT01607645 (13) [back to overview]Duration of Moderate Neutropenia Defined as an ANC Less Than 1000
NCT01607645 (13) [back to overview]Cytogenetic Response Defined as no Detectable Cytogenetic Abnormality in a Subsequent BM Specimen After Induction or Re-induction
NCT01607645 (13) [back to overview]Duration of Severe Neutropenia Defined as an ANC Less Than 500
NCT01607645 (13) [back to overview]CRi Defined as Meeting All Criteria for a Morphologic CR But ANC Remains Less Than 1,000/μL and/or Platelet Count Less Than 100,000/μL
NCT01607645 (13) [back to overview]CRMRD+ Defined as a Morphologic CR But With Minimal Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry, Cytogenetics, or Other Known Molecular Biomarkers
NCT01607645 (13) [back to overview]CRiMRD+ Defined as Meeting All Criteria for a CRi But With Evidence of Minimal Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry, Cytogenetics, or Other Known Molecular Biomarkers
NCT01700673 (4) [back to overview]Two-year Relapse Free Survival of Patients
NCT01700673 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01700673 (4) [back to overview]One-year RFS
NCT01700673 (4) [back to overview]Hematologic Toxicity as Determined by Anemia
NCT01707004 (8) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of Grade III-IV Acute GVHD
NCT01707004 (8) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT01707004 (8) [back to overview]Time to Neutrophil Recovery
NCT01707004 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Platelet Recovery by Day 30
NCT01707004 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Primary Graft Failure
NCT01707004 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complete Remission After Transplantation
NCT01707004 (8) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD According to BMTCTN
NCT01707004 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01720225 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Became Transfusion Independent
NCT01720225 (2) [back to overview]Participants With a Response
NCT01743859 (7) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT01743859 (7) [back to overview]Determine Biomarkers That Predict Response/Toxicity
NCT01743859 (7) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT01743859 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission or Complete Remission With Incomplete Recovery Blood Counts
NCT01743859 (7) [back to overview]Response or Remission Duration
NCT01743859 (7) [back to overview]Toxicity and SAEs Related to Treatment
NCT01743859 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01747499 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival as Measured by Number of Participants Alive at 1 Year After Transplant
NCT01747499 (7) [back to overview]Rate of Chronic GvHD
NCT01747499 (7) [back to overview]Phase II: Number of Participants With Grades II-IV Acute GvHD
NCT01747499 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Relapsed Within the First Year of Transplant
NCT01747499 (7) [back to overview]Phase I: to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Azacitidine in Patients Undergoing Matched (8 Out of 8) Unrelated Donor Transplant for Any Hematological Malignancy in Remission or With Stable Disease.
NCT01747499 (7) [back to overview]Treatment-related Mortality
NCT01747499 (7) [back to overview]Rate of Grades III-IV aGVHD at Day +180.
NCT01748240 (1) [back to overview]Response Rate
NCT01757535 (13) [back to overview]Time to Definitive Clinically Meaningful Deterioration for ≥ 2 Consecutive Visits as Measured Using the EQ-5D HRQoL Scale
NCT01757535 (13) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Time to Discontinuation From Treatment
NCT01757535 (13) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Time to Relapse
NCT01757535 (13) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Relapse Free Survival (RFS)
NCT01757535 (13) [back to overview]Time to Definitive Clinically Meaningful Deterioration for ≥ 2 Consecutive Visits as Measured Using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT-Fatigue Scale V 4.0)
NCT01757535 (13) [back to overview]Mean Change in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT-Fatigue Scale V 4.0) Score From Baseline
NCT01757535 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT01757535 (13) [back to overview]Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU): Number of Days Hospitalized Per Person-Year
NCT01757535 (13) [back to overview]Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU): Rate of Hospital Events Per Person Year
NCT01757535 (13) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier (K-M) Estimate for Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01757535 (13) [back to overview]Mean Change in the European Quality of Life-Five Dimensions-Three Levels (EQ-5D-3L) Score From Baseline
NCT01757535 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing a Clinically Meaningful Change (Improvement, No Change and Deterioration) in the FACIT-Fatigue Scale From Baseline
NCT01757535 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing a Clinically Meaningful Change (Improvement, No Change and Deterioration) in the EQ-5D-3L Scale From Baseline
NCT01814826 (29) [back to overview]MTD Expansion Phase, Rac: Observed Accumulation Ratio for MLN4924
NCT01814826 (29) [back to overview]Dose-escalation Phase, Lambdaz: Terminal Disposition Phase Rate Constant for MLN4924
NCT01814826 (29) [back to overview]Dose-escalation Phase, Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for MLN4924
NCT01814826 (29) [back to overview]Dose-escalation Phase, CLp: Systemic Clearance for MLN4924
NCT01814826 (29) [back to overview]Dose-escalation Phase, AUCinf: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Extrapolated to Infinity for MLN4924
NCT01814826 (29) [back to overview]Dose-escalation Phase, AUC24hours: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours Post-Dose for MLN4924
NCT01814826 (29) [back to overview]Dose-escalation Phase, AUC0-tau: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the End of the Dosing Interval (Tau) for MLN4924
NCT01814826 (29) [back to overview]Best Overall Response Rate
NCT01814826 (29) [back to overview]Dose-escalation Phase, Rac: Observed Accumulation Ratio for MLN4924
NCT01814826 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01814826 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Clinically Significant Vital Sign Findings
NCT01814826 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Clinically Significant Laboratory Evaluation Findings
NCT01814826 (29) [back to overview]MTD Expansion Phase, Vss: Volume of Distribution at Steady-state for MLN4924
NCT01814826 (29) [back to overview]MTD Expansion Phase, Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for MLN4924
NCT01814826 (29) [back to overview]MTD Expansion Phase, t1/2: Terminal Disposition Phase Half-life for MLN4924
NCT01814826 (29) [back to overview]MTD Expansion Phase, Lambdaz: Terminal Disposition Phase Rate Constant for MLN4924
NCT01814826 (29) [back to overview]Thirty-day Mortality Rate
NCT01814826 (29) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01814826 (29) [back to overview]Dose-escalation Phase, Ctrough: Observed Plasma Concentration at the End of the Dosing Interval for MLN4924
NCT01814826 (29) [back to overview]MTD Expansion Phase, Ctrough: Observed Plasma Concentration at the End of the Dosing Interval for MLN4924
NCT01814826 (29) [back to overview]MTD Expansion Phase, CLp: Systemic Clearance for MLN4924
NCT01814826 (29) [back to overview]MTD Expansion Phase, AUCinf: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Extrapolated to Infinity for MLN4924
NCT01814826 (29) [back to overview]MTD Expansion Phase, AUC24hours: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours Post-Dose for MLN4924
NCT01814826 (29) [back to overview]MTD Expansion Phase, AUC0-tau: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the End of the Dosing Interval (Tau) for MLN4924
NCT01814826 (29) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) Expansion Phase, Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for MLN4924
NCT01814826 (29) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT01814826 (29) [back to overview]Dose-escalation Phase, Vss: Volume of Distribution at Steady-state for MLN4924
NCT01814826 (29) [back to overview]Dose-escalation Phase, Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for MLN4924
NCT01814826 (29) [back to overview]Dose-escalation Phase, t1/2: Terminal Disposition Phase Half-life for MLN4924
NCT01845805 (3) [back to overview]Response Rate as Assessed by Number of Participants With Partial or Complete Response
NCT01845805 (3) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT01845805 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01846624 (5) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01846624 (5) [back to overview]Median Duration of Response (DoR)
NCT01846624 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01846624 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT01846624 (5) [back to overview]Complete Remission (CR) Rate
NCT01861002 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced a Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)
NCT01896856 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing a Dose Limiting Toxicity
NCT01896856 (4) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT01896856 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01896856 (4) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01912274 (7) [back to overview]Best Response Rate
NCT01912274 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01912274 (7) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT01912274 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT01912274 (7) [back to overview]Complete Cytogenetic Response Plus Molecular Complete Remission
NCT01912274 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Best Response
NCT01912274 (7) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT01957644 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) in Cycle 1
NCT01957644 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Objective Response (OR)
NCT01957644 (3) [back to overview]Determination of the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) Based on the Occurrence of Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) in Cycle 1
NCT01983969 (2) [back to overview]Frequency of DLT
NCT01983969 (2) [back to overview]Participants With Event-free Survival (EFS)
NCT02029417 (1) [back to overview]Frequency of Adverse Events, Graded According to NCI CTCAE v4.0
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- Cmax, Cmin, Cavg, and Ctrough of Azacitidine: Combination Cohort 3
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- Cmax, Cmin, Cavg, and Ctrough of Cytarabine: Combination Cohort 1
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- Cmax, Cmin, Cavg, and Ctrough of Daunorubicin: Combination Cohort 2
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- Cmax, Cmin, Cavg, and Ctrough of Daunorubicinol: Combination Cohort 2
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- Cmax, Cmin, Cavg, and Ctrough of PF-04449913: Combination Cohort 1
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- Cmax, Cmin, Cavg, and Ctrough of PF-04449913: Combination Cohort 2
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- Cmax, Cmin, Cavg, and Ctrough of PF-04449913: Combination Cohort 3
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- T1/2 of Cytarabine: Combination Cohort 1
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- Tmax of Ara-uridine: Combination Cohort 1
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- Tmax of Azacitidine: Combination Cohort 3
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- Tmax of Cytarabine: Combination Cohort 1
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- Tmax of PF-04449913: Combination Cohort 1
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- Tmax of PF-04449913: Combination Cohort 2
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- Tmax of PF-04449913: Combination Cohort 3
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Best Response: Combination Cohort 1
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Best Response: Combination Cohort 2
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Best Response: Combination Cohort 3
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Best Response: Monotherapy Cohort
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Number of Participants With TEAEs, Serious TEAEs, Treatment Related TEAEs, Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs Based on NCI CTCAE v4.0: Combination Cohort 1
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Number of Participants With TEAEs, Serious TEAEs, Treatment Related TEAEs, Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs Based on NCI CTCAE v4.0: Combination Cohort 3
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Treatment Related TEAEs, Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs Based on NCI CTCAE v4.0: Monotherapy Cohort
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR) or CR With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi) and DMR: Combination Cohort 1
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With CR/CRi and DMR: Combination Cohort 3
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Single Dose- Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve: From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau), From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) and From Time Zero to Infinity (AUCinf) of PF-04449913 for Monotherapy Cohort
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Time to Complete Remission (CR) or CR With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi) and DMR Response: Combination Cohort 3
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Time to Response: Combination Cohort 1
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Worst On-study Laboratory Abnormalities: Combination Cohort 1
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Worst On-study Laboratory Abnormalities: Combination Cohort 2
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Worst On-study Laboratory Abnormalities: Combination Cohort 3
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Worst On-study Laboratory Abnormalities: Monotherapy Cohort
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Single Dose- Clearance (CL/F) of PF-04449913: Monotherapy Cohort
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Number of Participants With TEAEs, Serious TEAEs, Treatment Related TEAEs, Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs Based on NCI CTCAE v4.0: Combination Cohort 2
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- Accumulation Ratio (Rac) of PF-04449913: Monotherapy Cohort
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- AUCtau of Daunorubicinol: Combination Cohort 2
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- AUCtau of PF-04449913: Monotherapy Cohort
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- Clearance (CL/F) of PF-04449913: Monotherapy Cohort
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- Steady State Accumulation Ratio (Rss) of PF-04449913: Monotherapy Cohort
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- T1/2 of Daunorubicin: Combination Cohort 2
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- Tmax of Daunorubicin: Combination Cohort 2
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- Tmax of Daunorubicinol: Combination Cohort 2
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- Tmax of PF-04449913: Monotherapy Cohort
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs Abnormalities: Combination Cohort 1
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs Abnormalities: Combination Cohort 2
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs Abnormalities: Combination Cohort 3
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs Abnormalities: Monotherapy Cohort
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Number of Participants With DLTs: Combination Cohort 1
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Number of Participants With DLTs: Combination Cohort 2
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Number of Participants With DLTs: Combination Cohort 3
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs): Monotherapy Cohort
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Overall Survival: Combination Cohort 1
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Disease Modifying Response (DMR): Expansion Cohort
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Single Dose- Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of PF-04449913: Monotherapy Cohort
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Single Dose- Terminal Plasma Half-life (T1/2) of PF-04449913: Monotherapy Cohort
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Single Dose- Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of PF-04449913: Monotherapy Cohort
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Single Dose- Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of PF-04449913: Monotherapy Cohort
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Duration of Complete Remission (CR) or CR With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi) and DMR Response: Combination Cohort 1
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Duration of Complete Remission (CR) or CR With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi) and DMR Response: Combination Cohort 3
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose Cmax, Minimum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmin), Average Observed Plasma Concentration (Cavg), Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of PF-04449913: Monotherapy Cohort
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- AUCinf and AUCtau of Cytarabine: Combination Cohort 1
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- AUCinf and AUCtau of Daunorubicin: Combination Cohort 2
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- AUCtau and AUCinf of Azacitidine: Combination Cohort 3
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- AUCtau of PF-04449913: Combination Cohort 1
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- AUCtau of PF-04449913: Combination Cohort 2
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- AUCtau of PF-04449913: Combination Cohort 3
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- CL/F of PF-04449913: Combination Cohort 1
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- CL/F of PF-04449913: Combination Cohort 2
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- CL/F of PF-04449913: Combination Cohort 3
NCT02038777 (68) [back to overview]Multiple Dose- Cmax, Cmin, and Ctrough of Ara-uridine: Combination Cohort 1
NCT02085408 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT02085408 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival by Donor Status
NCT02085408 (4) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With Complete Remission
NCT02085408 (4) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival for Maintenance
NCT02096055 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Complete Response
NCT02096055 (5) [back to overview]Leukemia-free Survival
NCT02096055 (5) [back to overview]Remission Duration
NCT02096055 (5) [back to overview]Survival
NCT02096055 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Most Frequently Reports Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Event.
NCT02158936 (20) [back to overview]Best Disease Response From Central Review (ITT)
NCT02158936 (20) [back to overview]Summary of Progression Free Survival From Investigator Assessment (ITT)
NCT02158936 (20) [back to overview]Bleeding Adverse Events (AEs) >= Grade 3
NCT02158936 (20) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Chronic Disease Therapy-fatigue Subscale (FACIT-Fatigue) (ITT)
NCT02158936 (20) [back to overview]Hematologic Improvement (HI) in Platelets, Neutrophils, and Hemoglobin Based on the Modified IWG Criteria for MDS (ITT)
NCT02158936 (20) [back to overview]Medical Resource Utilization (MRU): Event -Hospitalizations Inpatient and Outpatient
NCT02158936 (20) [back to overview]Medical Resource Utilization (MRU): Use of Site Specific Medical Resources
NCT02158936 (20) [back to overview]Number of of Subjects With Azacitidine Dose Delays, Dose Reductions, Interruptions
NCT02158936 (20) [back to overview]Best Disease Response From Investigator Assessment (ITT)
NCT02158936 (20) [back to overview]Summary of Post-Hoc Estimates of Steady-state Eltrombopag AUC0 Infinity Pharmacokinetic Parameters for a 50 mg Dose
NCT02158936 (20) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02158936 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Were Platelet Transfusion Independent (ITT Set)
NCT02158936 (20) [back to overview]Medical Resource Utilization (MRU): Event and Use of Site Specific Medical Resources - Non-study Laboratory Tests
NCT02158936 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Were Platelet Transfusion Independent During Cycles 1-4 of Azacitidine Therapy
NCT02158936 (20) [back to overview]Response Levels in All Domains of Euroquol-5 Dimensions of Health, 3 Response Levels (EQ-5D-3L™)
NCT02158936 (20) [back to overview]Cmax -Pharmacokinetic Parameter of Azacitidine
NCT02158936 (20) [back to overview]AUC0-infinity -Pharmacokinetic(s) Parameter of Azacitidine
NCT02158936 (20) [back to overview]Summary of AML Progression From Investigator Assessment and Central Review (ITT)
NCT02158936 (20) [back to overview]Summary of Post-Hoc Estimates of Steady-state Eltrombopag Cmax and Cmin Pharmacokinetic Parameters for a 50 mg Dose
NCT02158936 (20) [back to overview]Summary of Progression Free Survival From Central Review (ITT)
NCT02196857 (2) [back to overview]Toxicity Profile of Azacytidine and Sorafenib
NCT02196857 (2) [back to overview]Participants With a Response CR + PR + CRi
NCT02201329 (5) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve of Volasertib 200 mg in Plasma Over the Time Interval From 0 Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-∞)
NCT02201329 (5) [back to overview]Overall Objective Response (OR): Complete Remission (CR), Partial Remission (PR), or Marrow CR (mCR)
NCT02201329 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) in the First Cycle for the Determination of the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)
NCT02201329 (5) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose of Volasertib
NCT02201329 (5) [back to overview]Maximum Measured Concentration of the Volasertib 200 mg in Plasma (Cmax)
NCT02250326 (12) [back to overview]Dose Intensity Per Week of CC-486
NCT02250326 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Study Drug Dose Reductions
NCT02250326 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Study Drug Dose Reductions
NCT02250326 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Best Overall Response of Complete Response or Partial Response According to RECIST V 1.1 Criteria
NCT02250326 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment
NCT02250326 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Entire Treatment Period
NCT02250326 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Study Drug Dose Reductions
NCT02250326 (12) [back to overview]Kaplan Meier Estimate of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator
NCT02250326 (12) [back to overview]Dose Intensity Per Week of Nab-Paclitaxel
NCT02250326 (12) [back to overview]Dose Intensity Per Week of Durvalumab
NCT02250326 (12) [back to overview]Kaplan Meier Estimate of Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02250326 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) or Stable Disease (SD) According to RECIST V 1.1 Criteria
NCT02260440 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02260440 (3) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT02260440 (3) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT02265510 (10) [back to overview]Phase 2: Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE and SAE
NCT02265510 (10) [back to overview]Phase 1a, 1b, and Phase 2: Tmax: Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration for INCB052793
NCT02265510 (10) [back to overview]Phase 1a, 1b, and Phase 2: Tmax: Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration for Itacitinib
NCT02265510 (10) [back to overview]Phase 2: Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Hematological Malignancies
NCT02265510 (10) [back to overview]Phase 1a and 1b: Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
NCT02265510 (10) [back to overview]Phase 1A and 1B: Percentage of Participants With Response as Determined by Investigator's Assessment
NCT02265510 (10) [back to overview]Phase 1a, 1b, and Phase 2: AUC0-τ: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over Dosing Interval for INCB052793
NCT02265510 (10) [back to overview]Phase 1a, 1b, and Phase 2: AUC0-τ: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over Dosing Interval for Itacitinib
NCT02265510 (10) [back to overview]Phase 1a, 1b, and Phase 2: Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for INCB052793
NCT02265510 (10) [back to overview]Phase 1a, 1b, and Phase 2: Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Itacitinib
NCT02269943 (12) [back to overview]Apparent Total Clearance (CL/F) Of CC-486
NCT02269943 (12) [back to overview]Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) Of CC-486
NCT02269943 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
NCT02269943 (12) [back to overview]Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of CC-486
NCT02269943 (12) [back to overview]Kaplan Meier Estimate of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on an Independent Radiology Assessment According to RECIST 1.1 Criteria
NCT02269943 (12) [back to overview]Kaplan Meier Estimate of Overall Survival
NCT02269943 (12) [back to overview]Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) Of CC-486
NCT02269943 (12) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration -Time Curve From 0 Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC-inf, AUC0-∞) Of CC-486
NCT02269943 (12) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration Of CC-486 (AUC-t)
NCT02269943 (12) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) Of CC-486
NCT02269943 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete or Partial Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) Based on an Independent Radiology Assessment (IRA)
NCT02269943 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Stable Disease for ≥ 16 Weeks From the Date of the First Treatment, or CR or PR According to RECIST 1.1 Criteria and Based on an Independent Radiology Assessment
NCT02281084 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Progressed to Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)
NCT02281084 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Progressive Disease at Baseline Who Achieved Stable Disease
NCT02281084 (12) [back to overview]Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Onset of First and Best Response
NCT02281084 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT02281084 (12) [back to overview]Kaplan Meier Estimate of Duration of Best Response
NCT02281084 (12) [back to overview]Kaplan Meier Estimate of Duration of First Response
NCT02281084 (12) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Duration of Stable Disease
NCT02281084 (12) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Onset to Achieve Stable Disease
NCT02281084 (12) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Overall Survival
NCT02281084 (12) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT02281084 (12) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Time to Progression to AML
NCT02281084 (12) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate Based on the Modified International Working Group (IWG) 2006 Response Criteria for Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)
NCT02319369 (13) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) Following Administration of Milademetan In Combination With 5-Azacitidine (AZA)
NCT02319369 (13) [back to overview]Serum Macrophage Inhibitory Cytokine-1 (MIC-1) Fold Change From Baseline Following Administration of Milademetan In Combination With 5-Azacitidine (AZA)
NCT02319369 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Following Administration of Milademetan Alone and In Combination With 5-Azacitidine (AZA)
NCT02319369 (13) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) Following Administration of Milademetan In Combination With 5-Azacitidine (AZA)
NCT02319369 (13) [back to overview]Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) Following Administration of Milademetan Alone
NCT02319369 (13) [back to overview]Serum Macrophage Inhibitory Cytokine-1 (MIC-1) Fold Change From Baseline Following Administration of Milademetan In Combination With 5-Azacitidine (AZA)
NCT02319369 (13) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve up to 24 Hours (AUC0-24) Following Administration of Milademetan Alone
NCT02319369 (13) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve up to 24 Hours (AUC0-24) Following Administration of Milademetan In Combination With 5-Azacitidine (AZA)
NCT02319369 (13) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) Following Administration of Milademetan Alone
NCT02319369 (13) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) Following Administration of Milademetan Alone
NCT02319369 (13) [back to overview]Serum Macrophage Inhibitory Cytokine-1 (MIC-1) Fold Change From Baseline Following Administration of Milademetan Alone
NCT02319369 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants (≥10%) With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Following Administration of Milademetan Alone and In Combination With 5-Azacitidine (AZA)
NCT02319369 (13) [back to overview]Serum Macrophage Inhibitory Cytokine-1 (MIC-1) Fold Change From Baseline Following Administration of Milademetan In Combination With 5-Azacitidine (AZA)
NCT02343939 (9) [back to overview]Duration of Exposure of Entospletinib
NCT02343939 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
NCT02343939 (9) [back to overview]Event Free Survival (EFS)
NCT02343939 (9) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02343939 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
NCT02343939 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Composite Complete Remission at the End of Induction
NCT02343939 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Morphologic Complete Remission (CR) at the End of Induction
NCT02343939 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Response at the End of Induction
NCT02343939 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Laboratory Abnormalities
NCT02351037 (1) [back to overview]Efficacy of Ibrutinib Monotherapy or in Combination With Either LD-AraC or Azacitidine Using the Overall Remission Rate (Defined as Proportion of Subjects Achieving a CR or CRi) According to the LeukemiaNet Guidelines
NCT02367456 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Disease-Specific Efficacy Measures in the AML Cohort
NCT02367456 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants Meeting Categorical Criteria of QTcF Values in LIC, AML and MDS Cohorts
NCT02367456 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With SAEs in the AML and MDS Cohorts
NCT02367456 (22) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Glasdegib Dosed in Combination With Azacitidine (C1D7) and When Dosed Alone (C1D15) in the Lead-in Cohort
NCT02367456 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Disease-Specific Efficacy Measures in the MDS Cohort
NCT02367456 (22) [back to overview]Duration of CR in the AML and MDS Cohorts
NCT02367456 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Remission (CR) + Partial Remission (PR) in the LIC
NCT02367456 (22) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Median Overall Survival (OS) in the AML and MDS Cohorts
NCT02367456 (22) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Azacitidine Dosed in Combination With Glasdegib (C1D7) and When Dosed Alone (C1D1) in the Lead-in Cohort
NCT02367456 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Remission (CR) in the AML and MDS Cohorts
NCT02367456 (22) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Azacitidine Dosed in Combination With Glasdegib (C1D7) and When Dosed Alone (C1D1) in the Lead-in Cohort
NCT02367456 (22) [back to overview]Time to CR in the AML and MDS Cohorts
NCT02367456 (22) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Glasdegib Dosed in Combination With Azacitidine (C1D7) and When Dosed Alone (C1D15) in the Lead-in Cohort
NCT02367456 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Efficacy Measures Other Than CR in the LIC
NCT02367456 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in the AML and MDS Cohorts
NCT02367456 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in the LIC
NCT02367456 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in the LIC
NCT02367456 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With TEAEs in the AML and MDS Cohorts
NCT02367456 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) in the Lead-in Cohort (LIC)
NCT02367456 (22) [back to overview]Time to First Occurrence of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Glasdegib Dosed in Combination With Azacitidine (C1D7) and When Dosed Alone (C1D15) in the Lead-in Cohort
NCT02367456 (22) [back to overview]Tmax of Azacitidine Dosed in Combination With Glasdegib (C1D7) and When Dosed Alone (C1D1) in the Lead-in Cohort
NCT02367456 (22) [back to overview]Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of Glasdegib on C1D15 and C2D1 in the AML and MDS Cohorts
NCT02374099 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT02374099 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Confirmed CR, PR or Stable Disease (SD) for ≥ 24 Weeks (Clinical Benefit Rate) by Investigator Assessment
NCT02374099 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) to Treatment (Objective Response Rate) Based On the Investigator Assessment
NCT02374099 (6) [back to overview]Kaplan Meier Estimate of Duration of Response (DoR)
NCT02374099 (6) [back to overview]Kaplan Meier Estimate of Overall Survival
NCT02374099 (6) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT02399917 (5) [back to overview]Participants With an Objective Response
NCT02399917 (5) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival
NCT02399917 (5) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT02399917 (5) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose of Iirilumab in Combination With 5-azacitidine
NCT02399917 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT02421939 (12) [back to overview]Duration of Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02421939 (12) [back to overview]Duration of Leukemia-Free Survival (LFS)
NCT02421939 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Underwent Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
NCT02421939 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT02421939 (12) [back to overview]Duration of Event-Free Survival (EFS)
NCT02421939 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR) Rate
NCT02421939 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR) With Partial Hematological Recovery (CRh)
NCT02421939 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Composite Complete Remission (CRc Rate)
NCT02421939 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission and Complete Remission With Partial Hematological Recovery (CR/CRh) in the Gilteritinib Arm
NCT02421939 (12) [back to overview]Duration of Remission
NCT02421939 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)
NCT02421939 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Transfusion Conversion and Maintenance
NCT02458235 (8) [back to overview]Frequency of System Specific Grade 3 or Higher Treatment-related Adverse Events
NCT02458235 (8) [back to overview]Median Time to Relapse
NCT02458235 (8) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Serious Infection
NCT02458235 (8) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Severe Hematologic Toxicity Including Graft Failure
NCT02458235 (8) [back to overview]Relapse Rate
NCT02458235 (8) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Acute and Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
NCT02458235 (8) [back to overview]Median Relapse-free Survival
NCT02458235 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Whom Had >2 Dose Reductions for Any Reason
NCT02497404 (9) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival at 2 Years Post-transplant
NCT02497404 (9) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival at 1 Year Post-transplant
NCT02497404 (9) [back to overview]Overall Survival at 6 Months Post-transplant
NCT02497404 (9) [back to overview]Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD)
NCT02497404 (9) [back to overview]Overall Survival at 2 Years Post-Transplant
NCT02497404 (9) [back to overview]Overall Survival at 1 Year Post-Transplant
NCT02497404 (9) [back to overview]High-Risk Extensive Chronic Graft-versus-Host-Disease
NCT02497404 (9) [back to overview]Graft Failure
NCT02497404 (9) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival at 6 Months Post-transplant
NCT02546986 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
NCT02546986 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Best Overall Response of Complete Response or Partial Response
NCT02546986 (13) [back to overview]Terminal Phase of Half-life (T1/2) of CC-486
NCT02546986 (13) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of CC-486
NCT02546986 (13) [back to overview]Kaplan Meier Estimate of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on European Medicines Agency Methodology
NCT02546986 (13) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUCt) of CC-486
NCT02546986 (13) [back to overview]Kaplan Meier Estimate of Overall Survival
NCT02546986 (13) [back to overview]Kaplan Meier Estimate of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Methodology
NCT02546986 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) or Stable Disease (SD) for a Minimum Duration of 18 Weeks Compared to Baseline
NCT02546986 (13) [back to overview]Apparent Total Plasma Clearance (CL/F) of CC-486
NCT02546986 (13) [back to overview]Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F) of CC-486
NCT02546986 (13) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC∞) of CC-486
NCT02546986 (13) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of CC-486
NCT02577406 (20) [back to overview]Hematologic Improvement Rate
NCT02577406 (20) [back to overview]Event-Free Survival
NCT02577406 (20) [back to overview]The Percent of Participants Experiencing Clinically Significant Vital Sign Abnormalities
NCT02577406 (20) [back to overview]The Percentage of Participants Experiencing Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
NCT02577406 (20) [back to overview]Time to Response
NCT02577406 (20) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT02577406 (20) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure
NCT02577406 (20) [back to overview]The Percent of Participants Experiencing Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities - Serum Chemistry
NCT02577406 (20) [back to overview]Treatment Mortality at 30 Days
NCT02577406 (20) [back to overview]Treatment Mortality at 60 Days
NCT02577406 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
NCT02577406 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Health Utility Index
NCT02577406 (20) [back to overview]The Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT02577406 (20) [back to overview]The Percent of Participants Experiencing Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities - Hematology
NCT02577406 (20) [back to overview]The Number of Participants That Underwent Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)
NCT02577406 (20) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02577406 (20) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT02577406 (20) [back to overview]Overall Remission Rate
NCT02577406 (20) [back to overview]One-Year Survival Rate
NCT02577406 (20) [back to overview]Complete Remission Rate
NCT02587598 (22) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Tmax of Combination Treatment Group A INCB053914 50 mg + Cytarabine
NCT02587598 (22) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Tmax of Combination Treatment Group C INCB053914 80 mg + Ruxolitinib
NCT02587598 (22) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Tmax of INCB053914 Monotherapy
NCT02587598 (22) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Cl/F of Combination Treatment Group A INCB053914 50 mg + Cytarabine
NCT02587598 (22) [back to overview]Determination of the Safety and Tolerability of INCB053914 as Measured by the Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT02587598 (22) [back to overview]Evaluation of Phosphorylated BCL--2 Associated Death Promoter Protein (pBAD)
NCT02587598 (22) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: AUCtau of Combination Group B INCB053914 80 mg + Azatcitidine
NCT02587598 (22) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: AUCtau of Combination Treatment Group A INCB053914 50 mg + Cytarabine
NCT02587598 (22) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: AUCtau of Combination Treatment Group C INCB053914 80 mg + Ruxolitinib
NCT02587598 (22) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: AUCtau of INCB053914 Monotherapy
NCT02587598 (22) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Cl/F of Combination Group B INCB053914 80 mg + Azatcitidine
NCT02587598 (22) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Cl/F of Combination Treatment Group C INCB053914 80 mg + Ruxolitinib
NCT02587598 (22) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: CL/F of INCB053914 Monotherapy
NCT02587598 (22) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Cmax of Combination Group B INCB053914 80 mg + Azatcitidine
NCT02587598 (22) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Cmax of Combination Treatment Group A INCB053914 50 mg + Cytarabine
NCT02587598 (22) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Cmax of Combination Treatment Group C INCB053914 80 mg + Ruxolitinib
NCT02587598 (22) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Cmax of INCB053914 Monotherapy
NCT02587598 (22) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Cmin of Combination Group B INCB053914 80 mg + Azatcitidine
NCT02587598 (22) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Cmin of Combination Treatment Group A INCB053914 50 mg + Cytarabine
NCT02587598 (22) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Cmin of Combination Treatment Group C INCB053914 80 mg + Ruxolitinib
NCT02587598 (22) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Ctau of INCB053914 Monotherapy
NCT02587598 (22) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Tmax of Combination Group B INCB053914 80 mg + Azatcitidine
NCT02599649 (1) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT02610777 (27) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With CR and PR by Cycle 4
NCT02610777 (27) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Cycle 4
NCT02610777 (27) [back to overview]Six-month Survival Rate
NCT02610777 (27) [back to overview]Time to AML Transformation in HR MDS or CMML Participants
NCT02610777 (27) [back to overview]Time to First CR or PR
NCT02610777 (27) [back to overview]Time to Progressive Disease (PD), Relapse, or Death
NCT02610777 (27) [back to overview]Time to Subsequent Therapy
NCT02610777 (27) [back to overview]Number of Participants in the Safety Analysis Population With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values Reported as TEAEs
NCT02610777 (27) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With CR and Partial Remission (PR)
NCT02610777 (27) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR)
NCT02610777 (27) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Inpatient Hospital Admissions Related to HR MDS, CMML or Low-blast AML
NCT02610777 (27) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02610777 (27) [back to overview]One-year Survival Rate
NCT02610777 (27) [back to overview]Duration of Complete Remission (CR) in Low-blast AML
NCT02610777 (27) [back to overview]Duration of Complete Remission (CR) and Partial Remission (PR)
NCT02610777 (27) [back to overview]Duration of Complete Remission (CR)
NCT02610777 (27) [back to overview]Number of Participants in the Safety Analysis Population With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as TEAEs
NCT02610777 (27) [back to overview]Number of Participants in the Safety Analysis Population With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline Values in Vital Signs Reported as TEAEs
NCT02610777 (27) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT02610777 (27) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Change From Baseline Values in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
NCT02610777 (27) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Red Blood Cells (RBCs) and Platelet-transfusion Independence
NCT02610777 (27) [back to overview]Event-Free Survival (EFS)
NCT02610777 (27) [back to overview]Duration of Overall Response
NCT02610777 (27) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Response
NCT02610777 (27) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With CR in Low-blast AML by Cycle 4
NCT02610777 (27) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With CR in Low-blast AML
NCT02610777 (27) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With CR by Cycle 4
NCT02677922 (23) [back to overview]The Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events: Phase 2 (Randomized Stage)
NCT02677922 (23) [back to overview]AUC (0-8)- Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve: Phase 2 (Randomized Stage)
NCT02677922 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Health Utility Indices of the EQ-5D-5L: Phase 2 (Randomized Stage)
NCT02677922 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores of the EQ-5D-5L: Phase 2 (Randomized Stage)
NCT02677922 (23) [back to overview]Cmax- Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration: Phase 2 (Randomized Stage)
NCT02677922 (23) [back to overview]Complete Remission Rate: Phase 2 (Randomized Stage)
NCT02677922 (23) [back to overview]Event-free Survival (EFS): Phase 2 (Randomized Stage)
NCT02677922 (23) [back to overview]Hematologic Improvement (HI) Rate: Phase 2 (Randomized Stage)
NCT02677922 (23) [back to overview]One Year Survival Rate: Phase 2 (Randomized Stage)
NCT02677922 (23) [back to overview]AUC (0-24)- Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve: Phase 2 (Randomized Stage)
NCT02677922 (23) [back to overview]The Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events: Phase 1B (Dose Finding and Expansion Stage)
NCT02677922 (23) [back to overview]Cmax- Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration: Phase 1B (Expansion Stage)
NCT02677922 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality-of-Life Domain Scores of the EORTC QLQ-C30: Phase 2 (Randomized Stage)
NCT02677922 (23) [back to overview]AUC (0-8)- Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve: Phase 1B (Expansion Stage)
NCT02677922 (23) [back to overview]Tmax- Time of Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration: Phase 2 (Randomized Stage)
NCT02677922 (23) [back to overview]Time to Response: Phase 2 (Randomized Stage)
NCT02677922 (23) [back to overview]The Number of Participants Experiencing Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs): Phase 1B (Dose Finding Stage)
NCT02677922 (23) [back to overview]Duration of Response: Phase 2 (Randomized Stage)
NCT02677922 (23) [back to overview]Sponsor Derived CR and CRh: Phase 1B (Dose Finding and Expansion Stage)
NCT02677922 (23) [back to overview]Overall Survival: Phase 2 (Randomized Stage)
NCT02677922 (23) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate: Phase 2 (Randomized Stage)
NCT02677922 (23) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate: Phase 1B (Dose Finding and Expansion Stage)
NCT02677922 (23) [back to overview]Tmax- Time of Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration: Phase 1B (Expansion Stage)
NCT02706899 (2) [back to overview]Safety of the Combination of Vadastuximab Talirine and Azacitidine Measured by the Number of Participants With Adverse Events and Laboratory Abnormalities
NCT02706899 (2) [back to overview]Phase 1 Outcome Measure: Recommended Dose of Vadastuximab Talirine for the Phase 2 Portion of the Study
NCT02711137 (17) [back to overview]Part 2 - Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of INCB057643.
NCT02711137 (17) [back to overview]Percent Inhibition of Total Cellular Myc Protein Concentrations Before and After Administration of INCB057643 When Administered as Monotherapy in an Ex-vivo Assay
NCT02711137 (17) [back to overview]Part 2-Tmax: Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration of INCB057643
NCT02711137 (17) [back to overview]Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of INCB057643.
NCT02711137 (17) [back to overview]AUC0-t: Area Under the Single-dose Plasma Concentration-time Curve of INCB057643
NCT02711137 (17) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) With INCB057643 in Solid Tumors
NCT02711137 (17) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) With INCB057643 in Solid Tumors
NCT02711137 (17) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) With INCB057643 in Solid Tumors
NCT02711137 (17) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) With INCB057643 in Solid Tumors
NCT02711137 (17) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) With INCB057643 in Solid Tumors
NCT02711137 (17) [back to overview]AUC0-24: Area Under the Steady-state Plasma Concentration-time Curve of INCB057643 Administered as Monotherapy
NCT02711137 (17) [back to overview]AUC0-24: Area Under the Steady-state Plasma Concentration-time Curve of INCB057643 Administered as Monotherapy
NCT02711137 (17) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) With INCB057643 in Solid Tumors
NCT02711137 (17) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) With INCB057643 in Solid Tumors
NCT02711137 (17) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) With INCB057643 in Solid Tumors
NCT02711137 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE's).
NCT02711137 (17) [back to overview]Tmax: Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration of INCB057643
NCT02712905 (21) [back to overview]CL/F of INCB059872 in Plasma When Received as Monotherapy
NCT02712905 (21) [back to overview]Cmax of INCB059872 in Plasma When Received as Combination Therapy
NCT02712905 (21) [back to overview]Cmax of INCB059872 in Plasma When Received as Monotherapy
NCT02712905 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants Receiving INCB059872 Combination Therapy With Any TEAE
NCT02712905 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants Receiving INCB059872 Monotherapy With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
NCT02712905 (21) [back to overview]ORR for Altering the Natural History of the Disease in Participants With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Who Received INCB059872 Monotherapy
NCT02712905 (21) [back to overview]ORR for Altering the Natural History of the Disease in Participants With AML Who Received Combination Therapy
NCT02712905 (21) [back to overview]ORR for Altering the Natural History of the Disease in Participants With MDS Who Received Combination Therapy
NCT02712905 (21) [back to overview]ORR for Altering the Natural History of the Disease in Participants With Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Who Received INCB059872 Monotherapy
NCT02712905 (21) [back to overview]AUC(0-τ) of INCB059872 in Plasma When Received as Combination Therapy
NCT02712905 (21) [back to overview]AUC(0-τ) of INCB059872 in Plasma When Received as Monotherapy
NCT02712905 (21) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Participants With the Indicated Type of Solid Tumors Who Received INCB059872 Monotherapy
NCT02712905 (21) [back to overview]ORR in Participants With SCLC Who Received Combination Therapy
NCT02712905 (21) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Participants With the Indicated Type of Solid Tumors Who Received INCB059872 Monotherapy
NCT02712905 (21) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Participants With the Indicated Type of Solid Tumors Who Received INCB059872 Monotherapy
NCT02712905 (21) [back to overview]CL/F of INCB059872 in Plasma When Received as Combination Therapy
NCT02712905 (21) [back to overview]Tmax of INCB059872 in Plasma When Received as Monotherapy
NCT02712905 (21) [back to overview]Tmax of INCB059872 in Plasma When Received as Combination Therapy
NCT02712905 (21) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Participants With the Indicated Type of Solid Tumors Who Received INCB059872 Monotherapy
NCT02712905 (21) [back to overview]t1/2 of INCB059872 in Plasma When Received as Monotherapy
NCT02712905 (21) [back to overview]t1/2 of INCB059872 in Plasma When Received as Combination Therapy
NCT02721875 (5) [back to overview]Objective Response Defined as Best Overall Response of Complete Remission, Partial Remission or Haematological Improvement According to the International Working Group 2006 Criteria
NCT02721875 (5) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Volasertib
NCT02721875 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) in the First Cycle
NCT02721875 (5) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over the Time Interval From Zero to the Last Measured Time Point tz of Volasertib (AUC0-tz) (for Monotherapy)
NCT02721875 (5) [back to overview]Maximum Measured Plasma Concentration of Volasertib (Cmax) (for Monotherapy)
NCT02775903 (25) [back to overview]MDS Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Time to AML Transformation
NCT02775903 (25) [back to overview]MDS Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Duration of Response
NCT02775903 (25) [back to overview]MDS Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT02775903 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Selected Chemistry Parameters I
NCT02775903 (25) [back to overview]AML Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Hematologic Improvement
NCT02775903 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Selected Hematology Parameters II
NCT02775903 (25) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Overall Survival
NCT02775903 (25) [back to overview]MDS Cohort: Kaplan Meier Estimate of Relapse-free Survival
NCT02775903 (25) [back to overview]MDS Cohort: Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to First Response
NCT02775903 (25) [back to overview]MDS Cohort: Overall Response Rate
NCT02775903 (25) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT02775903 (25) [back to overview]MDS Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Disease Transformation to AML
NCT02775903 (25) [back to overview]AML Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Duration of Response
NCT02775903 (25) [back to overview]One-year Survival
NCT02775903 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Selected Chemistry Parameters II
NCT02775903 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Selected Chemistry Parameters III
NCT02775903 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Selected Chemistry Parameters IV
NCT02775903 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Selected Hematology Parameters I
NCT02775903 (25) [back to overview]Durvalumab Serum Concentration
NCT02775903 (25) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT02775903 (25) [back to overview]MDS Cohort: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Cytogenetic Response
NCT02775903 (25) [back to overview]AML Cohort: Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to First Response
NCT02775903 (25) [back to overview]AML Cohort: Kaplan Meier Estimate of Relapse-free Survival
NCT02775903 (25) [back to overview]AML Cohort: Overall Response Rate
NCT02775903 (25) [back to overview]AML Cohort: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Cytogenetic Response
NCT02782468 (12) [back to overview]CL: Total Clearance for Pevonedistat When Administered Alone and in Combination With Azacitidine on Cycle 1 Day 5
NCT02782468 (12) [back to overview]CL: Total Clearance for Pevonedistat When Administered Alone and in Combination With Azacitidine on Cycle 1 Day 1
NCT02782468 (12) [back to overview]AUC(0-tau): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time Tau Over the Dosing Interval for Pevonedistat When Administered Alone and in Combination With Azacitidine on Cycle 1 Day 5
NCT02782468 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With CR for Participants With MDS
NCT02782468 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With CR for Participants With AML
NCT02782468 (12) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) for Participants With AML
NCT02782468 (12) [back to overview]ORR for Participants With MDS
NCT02782468 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values
NCT02782468 (12) [back to overview]Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Pevonedistat When Administered Alone and in Combination With Azacitidine on Cycle 1 Day 5
NCT02782468 (12) [back to overview]Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Pevonedistat When Administered Alone and in Combination With Azacitidine on Cycle 1 Day 1
NCT02782468 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT02782468 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 4.03 During Cycle 1
NCT02785900 (10) [back to overview]Mortality Rates at Day 30 and Day 60
NCT02785900 (10) [back to overview]Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Negative Composite Complete Remission Rate
NCT02785900 (10) [back to overview]Time to Complete Remission
NCT02785900 (10) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT02785900 (10) [back to overview]Leukemia-free Survival
NCT02785900 (10) [back to overview]Event-free Survival
NCT02785900 (10) [back to overview]Duration of Remission
NCT02785900 (10) [back to overview]Composite Complete Remission (CRc) Rate
NCT02785900 (10) [back to overview]Incidence of Grade 3 or Higher Laboratory Abnormalities
NCT02785900 (10) [back to overview]Type, Incidence, Severity, Seriousness, and Relatedness of Adverse Events
NCT02828358 (5) [back to overview]Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 1 Prior to First Course of Azacitidine
NCT02828358 (5) [back to overview]Tolerability of Azacitidine in Combination With Interfant-06 Standard Chemotherapy in Evaluable Infant Patients With Newly Diagnosed ALL With KMT2A Gene Rearrangement (KMT2A-R). KMT2A Gene Rearrangement (KMT2A-R)
NCT02828358 (5) [back to overview]Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 5 of Second Course of Azacitidine
NCT02828358 (5) [back to overview]Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 5 of First Course of Azacitidine
NCT02828358 (5) [back to overview]Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 1 Prior to Second Course of Azacitidine
NCT02900560 (2) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events Related to Pembrolizumab as Assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03.
NCT02900560 (2) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events Related to CC-486 as Assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03.
NCT02901899 (3) [back to overview]Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
NCT02901899 (3) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) Using RECIST 1.1
NCT02901899 (3) [back to overview]Incidence of Adverse Events
NCT02929498 (28) [back to overview]Part 1: Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate at Indicated Time-points
NCT02929498 (28) [back to overview]Part 1: Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Indicated Time-points
NCT02929498 (28) [back to overview]Part 1: Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin, Creatinine and Urate at Indicated Time Points
NCT02929498 (28) [back to overview]Part 1: Number of Participants With Any Non-serious Adverse Event (Non-SAE), Serious AE (SAE), Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT), Dose Reductions or Delays and Withdrawals Due to Toxicities
NCT02929498 (28) [back to overview]Part 1: Change From Baseline in Body Temperature at Indicated Time-points
NCT02929498 (28) [back to overview]Part 1: Plasma Concentration of GSK2879552
NCT02929498 (28) [back to overview]Part 1: Change From Baseline in Blast/Leukocytes at Indicated Time-points
NCT02929498 (28) [back to overview]Part 1: Change From Baseline in Partial Pressure Carbon Dioxide (pCO2) at Indicated Time Points
NCT02929498 (28) [back to overview]Part 1: Overall Survival
NCT02929498 (28) [back to overview]Part 1: Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) at Indicated Time-points
NCT02929498 (28) [back to overview]Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Investigator-assessed Best Response Assessed by Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT02929498 (28) [back to overview]Part 1: Progression-free Survival
NCT02929498 (28) [back to overview]Part 1: Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes at Indicated Time-points
NCT02929498 (28) [back to overview]Part 1: Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Indicated Time-points
NCT02929498 (28) [back to overview]Part 1: Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at Indicated Time-points
NCT02929498 (28) [back to overview]Part 1: Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (MCH) at Indicated Time-points
NCT02929498 (28) [back to overview]Part 1: Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Mean Heart Rate at Indicated Time-points
NCT02929498 (28) [back to overview]Part 1: Proportion of Participants With Disease Progression to Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia (AML)
NCT02929498 (28) [back to overview]Part 1: Time to AML Progression
NCT02929498 (28) [back to overview]Part 1: Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) and Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT) at Indicated Time-points
NCT02929498 (28) [back to overview]Part 1: Change From Baseline in Albumin and Protein at Indicated Time Points
NCT02929498 (28) [back to overview]Part 1: Change From Baseline in Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium, Phosphate and Urea Nitrogen at Indicated Time-points
NCT02929498 (28) [back to overview]Part 1: Change From Baseline in ECG PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTc Corrected by Bazett's Formula (QTcB) and QTc Corrected by Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) at Indicated Time-points
NCT02929498 (28) [back to overview]Part 1: Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) and Hemoglobin (Hb) at Indicated Time-points
NCT02929498 (28) [back to overview]Part 1: Number of Participants With Documented Platelet and Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions Per Month
NCT02929498 (28) [back to overview]Part 1: Change From Baseline in Percent Reticulocytes at Indicated Time-points
NCT02929498 (28) [back to overview]Part 1: Change From Baseline in Platelets, Neutrophils, Monocytes, Lymphocytes, Leucocyte, Eosinophils and Basophils at Indicated Time-points
NCT02929498 (28) [back to overview]Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Investigator-assessed Best Response Assessed by Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor and Immune Cells as Assessed by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) at Baseline
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (nAb) Against Utomilumab by Never and Ever Positive Status
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT)
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Utomilumab by Never and Ever Positive Status
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Rituximab by Never and Ever Positive Status
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Avelumab by Never and Ever Positive Status
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Concentration Verses Time Summary of Avelumab
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Concentration Verses Time Summary of Avelumab
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate as Assessed by the Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Time to Tumor Response (TTR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria
NCT02951156 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 3, As Per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria For Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
NCT02953561 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02953561 (4) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT02953561 (4) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival
NCT02953561 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Response
NCT02954653 (9) [back to overview]Duration of Objective Response Rate (ORR) [Part 1]
NCT02954653 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities by Type and Maximum National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (NCI CTCAE) Grade [Part 1]
NCT02954653 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities by Type and Maximum National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (NCI CTCAE) Grade [Part 1]
NCT02954653 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) [Part 1]
NCT02954653 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) by Maximum National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (NCI CTCAE) Grade [Part 1]
NCT02954653 (9) [back to overview]Incidence of Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against PF-06747143 [Part 1]
NCT02954653 (9) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival [Part 1]
NCT02954653 (9) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Percentage of Participants With Objective Response [Part 1]
NCT02954653 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) [Part 1]
NCT02959437 (5) [back to overview]Parts 1 and 2: Progression-free Survival Based on RECIST v1.1.
NCT02959437 (5) [back to overview]Part 1 and 2 : Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
NCT02959437 (5) [back to overview]Part 1 and 2: Objective Response Rate Based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
NCT02959437 (5) [back to overview]Parts 1 and 2: Duration of Response Based on RECIST v1.1
NCT02959437 (5) [back to overview]Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Responders Determined by Immunohistochemistry
NCT02993523 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02993523 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR) and Complete Remission With Incomplete Marrow Recovery (CRi)
NCT03072043 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT03072043 (5) [back to overview]Phase 2: Complete Response (CR) Rate
NCT03072043 (5) [back to overview]Phase 2: Duration of Response
NCT03072043 (5) [back to overview]Phase 2: Overall Response Rate
NCT03072043 (5) [back to overview]Phase 1b: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)
NCT03094637 (3) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) Defined as Complete Response + Partial Response + Hematological Improvement
NCT03094637 (3) [back to overview]Event Free Survival
NCT03094637 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT03151304 (13) [back to overview]Rate of Cytogenetic CR
NCT03151304 (13) [back to overview]Rate of Leukemic Transformation
NCT03151304 (13) [back to overview]Rate of Leukemic Transformation
NCT03151304 (13) [back to overview]Rate of Leukemic Transformation
NCT03151304 (13) [back to overview]Rate of Leukemic Transformation
NCT03151304 (13) [back to overview]Clinical Benefit Rate
NCT03151304 (13) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT03151304 (13) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT03151304 (13) [back to overview]Overall Hematologic Improvement (HI) Response Rate
NCT03151304 (13) [back to overview]Event-free Survival (EFS)
NCT03151304 (13) [back to overview]Complete Response (CR) Rate
NCT03151304 (13) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DoR)
NCT03151304 (13) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT03151408 (13) [back to overview]Cytogenetic Complete Remission (CRc) Rate
NCT03151408 (13) [back to overview]Duration of Composite Complete Remission
NCT03151408 (13) [back to overview]Duration of Morphologic CR
NCT03151408 (13) [back to overview]Morphologic Complete Remission (CR) Rate
NCT03151408 (13) [back to overview]Change in Quality of Life From Baseline (EORTC QLQ-C30 - European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-life Questionnaire Core 30)
NCT03151408 (13) [back to overview]Complete Remission Without Minimal Residual Disease (CRmrd) Rate
NCT03151408 (13) [back to overview]Transfusion Independence (TI)
NCT03151408 (13) [back to overview]Composite Complete Remission (cCR) Rate
NCT03151408 (13) [back to overview]Morphologic CR Within 6 Cycles Rate
NCT03151408 (13) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT03151408 (13) [back to overview]Progressive Free Survival Rate (PFS)
NCT03151408 (13) [back to overview]Relapse Free Survival
NCT03151408 (13) [back to overview]Time to CR
NCT03165721 (16) [back to overview]Quality of Life (QOL) Relative to Any Degree of Response (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Physical Health)
NCT03165721 (16) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival Probability at 6 Months
NCT03165721 (16) [back to overview]V(2)/F (Apparent Volume of Distribution)
NCT03165721 (16) [back to overview]Quality of Life (QOL) Relative to Any Degree of Response (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Mental Health)
NCT03165721 (16) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) Probability at 12 Months
NCT03165721 (16) [back to overview]Percent Decrease in Long Interspersed Nuclear Element -1 (LINE-1) Demethylation
NCT03165721 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious and Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0)
NCT03165721 (16) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Guadecitabine (SGI-110)
NCT03165721 (16) [back to overview]Quality of Life (QOL) Relative to Any Degree of Response (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Mental Health)
NCT03165721 (16) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC 0-5hr)
NCT03165721 (16) [back to overview](CL/F) Apparent Total Body Clearance
NCT03165721 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With an Overall Response (Complete Response or Partial Response) of SGI-11 Using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
NCT03165721 (16) [back to overview]Half Life (t1/2) of Guadecitabine (SGI-110)
NCT03165721 (16) [back to overview]Change in Distress From Baseline
NCT03165721 (16) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Guadecitabine (SGI-110)
NCT03165721 (16) [back to overview]Change in Distress From Baseline
NCT03173248 (1) [back to overview]Event-Free Survival (EFS)
NCT03238248 (5) [back to overview]Rate of Marrow Complete Response (mCR)
NCT03238248 (5) [back to overview]Rate of Hematologic Response Per IWG
NCT03238248 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survial Time
NCT03238248 (5) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT03238248 (5) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT03264404 (1) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT03268954 (29) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT03268954 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Overall Response 2 (OR2)
NCT03268954 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Overall Response (OR)
NCT03268954 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hematologic Improvement (HI)
NCT03268954 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With CR, Partial Remission (PR) and Hematologic Improvement (HI)
NCT03268954 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With CR and Marrow CR, PR and Hematologic Improvement (HI)
NCT03268954 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Overall Response by Cycle 6
NCT03268954 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Overall Response in Participants Who Have TP53 Mutations, 17p Deletions, and/or Are Determined to be in an Adverse Cytogenetic Risk Group
NCT03268954 (29) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Red Blood Cells (RBCs) and Platelet-transfusion Independence
NCT03268954 (29) [back to overview]Time to Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) Transformation in Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (HR MDS), Higher-Risk Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemias (HR CMML) and HR MDS/CMML Participants
NCT03268954 (29) [back to overview]Time to First Complete Remission (CR) or Partial Remission (PR) or Complete Remission With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi)
NCT03268954 (29) [back to overview]Time to Progressive Disease (PD), Relapse After CR (Low-blast AML), Relapse After CR or PR (HR MDS/CMML), or Death
NCT03268954 (29) [back to overview]Duration of Red Blood Cells (RBCs) and Duration of Platelet-transfusion Independence and Duration of Red Blood Cells (RBCs) and Platelet-transfusion Independence
NCT03268954 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With CR and Marrow CR and PR
NCT03268954 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With CR and Marrow CR
NCT03268954 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complete Remission (CR) and CR+ Complete Remission With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi)
NCT03268954 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With at Least 1 Inpatient Hospital Admissions Related to HR MDS, CMML or Low-blast AML
NCT03268954 (29) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Six-Month Survival Rate
NCT03268954 (29) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimates of One-Year Survival Rate
NCT03268954 (29) [back to overview]Event-Free Survival (EFS)
NCT03268954 (29) [back to overview]Duration of Overall Response 2 (OR2)
NCT03268954 (29) [back to overview]Duration of Overall Response (OR)
NCT03268954 (29) [back to overview]Duration of Complete Remission + Complete Remission With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi)
NCT03268954 (29) [back to overview]Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire- Core 30
NCT03268954 (29) [back to overview]Overall Survival in Participants Who Have TP53 Mutations, 17p Deletions, and/or Are Determined to be in an Adverse Cytogenetic Risk Group
NCT03268954 (29) [back to overview]Duration of Complete Remission (CR)
NCT03268954 (29) [back to overview]Event-Free Survival in Participants Who Have TP53 Mutations, 17p Deletions, and/or Are Determined to be in an Adverse Cytogenetic Risk Group
NCT03268954 (29) [back to overview]Sixty-Day Mortality Reported as Number of Participants Who Died Up to Day 60
NCT03268954 (29) [back to overview]Thirty-Day Mortality Reported as Number of Participants Who Died Up to Day 30
NCT03390296 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT03390296 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Response
NCT03416179 (30) [back to overview]Intensive Study: Overall Survival (OS)
NCT03416179 (30) [back to overview]Non-intensive Study: Percentage of Participants With Morphologic Leukemia-free State (MLFS)
NCT03416179 (30) [back to overview]Intensive Study: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Coagulation Laboratory Abnormalities Graded by NCI CTCAE v.4.03
NCT03416179 (30) [back to overview]Non-intensive Study: Time to Response
NCT03416179 (30) [back to overview]Non-intensive Study: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Glasdegib
NCT03416179 (30) [back to overview]Non-intensive Study: Number of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Graded by NCI CTCAE v.4.03
NCT03416179 (30) [back to overview]Non-intensive Study: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematological Laboratory Abnormalities Graded by NCI CTCAE v.4.03
NCT03416179 (30) [back to overview]Non-intensive Study: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Corrected QT (QTc) Interval
NCT03416179 (30) [back to overview]Non-intensive Study: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Coagulation Laboratory Abnormalities Graded by NCI CTCAE v.4.03
NCT03416179 (30) [back to overview]Non-intensive Study: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities Graded by NCI CTCAE v.4.03
NCT03416179 (30) [back to overview]Intensive Study: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Glasdegib
NCT03416179 (30) [back to overview]Intensive Study: Percentage of Participants With Partial Remission (PR)
NCT03416179 (30) [back to overview]Non-intensive Study: Percentage of Participants With Partial Remission (PR)
NCT03416179 (30) [back to overview]Non-intensive Study: Percentage of Participants Who Improved in Fatigue Score Measured by the MDASI-AML/MDS Questionnaire at Week 12
NCT03416179 (30) [back to overview]Intensive Study: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities Graded by NCI CTCAE v.4.03
NCT03416179 (30) [back to overview]Intensive Study: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs),Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and According to Severity AEs Graded by NCI CTCAE v.4.03
NCT03416179 (30) [back to overview]Intensive Study: Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission Including Negative Minimal Residual Disease (CRMRD-neg)
NCT03416179 (30) [back to overview]Non-intensive Study: Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR) Including Negative Minimal Residual Disease (CRMRD-neg)
NCT03416179 (30) [back to overview]Non-intensive Study: Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission With Incomplete Hematologic Recovery (CRi)
NCT03416179 (30) [back to overview]Non-intensive Study: Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission With Partial Hematologic Recovery (CRh)
NCT03416179 (30) [back to overview]Non-intensive Study: Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission Without Negative Minimal Residual Disease (CRMRD-neg)
NCT03416179 (30) [back to overview]Non-intensive Study: Overall Survival (OS)
NCT03416179 (30) [back to overview]Intensive Study: Percentage of Participants Who Improved in Fatigue Score Measured by the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory -Acute Myelogenous Leukemia/Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDASI-AML/MDS) Questionnaire
NCT03416179 (30) [back to overview]Intensive Study: Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission With Incomplete Hematologic Recovery (CRi)
NCT03416179 (30) [back to overview]Non-intensive Study: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs),Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and According to Severity AEs Graded by NCI CTCAE v.4.03
NCT03416179 (30) [back to overview]Intensive Study: Number of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Graded by NCI CTCAE v.4.03
NCT03416179 (30) [back to overview]Intensive Study: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematological Laboratory Abnormalities Graded by NCI CTCAE v.4.03
NCT03416179 (30) [back to overview]Intensive Study: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Corrected QT (QTc) Interval
NCT03416179 (30) [back to overview]Intensive Study: Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission Without Negative Minimal Residual Disease (CRMRD-neg)
NCT03416179 (30) [back to overview]Intensive Study: Percentage of Participants With Morphologic Leukemia-free State (MLFS)
NCT03465540 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced a Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT)
NCT03465540 (14) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT03465540 (14) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to 168 Hours (AUC0-168) for AMG 397
NCT03465540 (14) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) for Participants With Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL)
NCT03465540 (14) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT03465540 (14) [back to overview]Time to Response (TTR)
NCT03465540 (14) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT03465540 (14) [back to overview]Clearance (CL) of AMG 397
NCT03465540 (14) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) for Participants With Multiple Myeloma (MM)
NCT03465540 (14) [back to overview]Half-life (t1/2) of AMG 397
NCT03465540 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced a Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
NCT03465540 (14) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of AMG 397
NCT03465540 (14) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) for Participants With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
NCT03465540 (14) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) for AMG 397
NCT03542266 (3) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Overall Survival
NCT03542266 (3) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Progression-Free Survival
NCT03542266 (3) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate
NCT03593915 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
NCT03614728 (22) [back to overview]Part 1: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC[0-inf]) of GSK3326595 Following Administration of Single Dose
NCT03614728 (22) [back to overview]Part 1: Area Under Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero (Pre-dose) to Last Time of Quantifiable Concentration Within Participant Across All Treatments (AUC[0-t]) of GSK3326595 Following Administration of Single Dose
NCT03614728 (22) [back to overview]Part 1: Apparent Terminal Phase Half-life (t1/2) of GSK3326595 Following Administration of Single Dose
NCT03614728 (22) [back to overview]Part 1: Accumulation Ratio Following Administration of GSK3326595
NCT03614728 (22) [back to overview]Part 1: AUC(0-inf) of GSK3326595 Following Administration of Repeat Dose
NCT03614728 (22) [back to overview]Part 1: Number of Participants With AEs by Severity
NCT03614728 (22) [back to overview]Part 1: Progression Free Survival
NCT03614728 (22) [back to overview]Part 1: Tmax of GSK3326595 Following Administration of Repeat Dose
NCT03614728 (22) [back to overview]Part 1: Time of Maximum Concentration Observed (Tmax) of GSK3326595 Following Administration of Single Dose
NCT03614728 (22) [back to overview]Part 1: Time Invariance Following Administration of GSK3326595
NCT03614728 (22) [back to overview]Part 1: t1/2 of GSK3326595 Following Administration of Repeat Dose
NCT03614728 (22) [back to overview]Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
NCT03614728 (22) [back to overview]Part 1: Overall Survival
NCT03614728 (22) [back to overview]Part 1: Overall Response Rate
NCT03614728 (22) [back to overview]Part 1: Oral Clearance (CL/F) of GSK3326595 Following Administration of Single Dose
NCT03614728 (22) [back to overview]Part 1: Number of Participants With DLTs
NCT03614728 (22) [back to overview]Part 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of GSK3326595 Following Administration of Single Dose
NCT03614728 (22) [back to overview]Part 1: Cmax of GSK3326595 Following Administration of Repeat Dose
NCT03614728 (22) [back to overview]Part 1: CL/F of GSK3326595 Following Administration of Repeat Dose
NCT03614728 (22) [back to overview]Part 1: AUC(0-t) of GSK3326595 Following Administration of Repeat Dose
NCT03614728 (22) [back to overview]Part 1: Number of Participants With Common Non-STEAEs and STEAEs
NCT03614728 (22) [back to overview]Part 1: AUC From 0 Hours to the Time of Next Dosing (AUC[0-tau]) of GSK3326595
NCT03684811 (14) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT03684811 (14) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT03684811 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)
NCT03684811 (14) [back to overview]Olutasidenib Concentration Within Cerebro-spinal Fluid (CSF)
NCT03684811 (14) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT03684811 (14) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT03684811 (14) [back to overview]Rate of Drug Distribution Within the Blood Stream (Vd/F)
NCT03684811 (14) [back to overview]Time for Half of the Drug to be Absent in Blood Stream Following Dose (T 1/2)
NCT03684811 (14) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT03684811 (14) [back to overview]Time to Response (TTR)
NCT03684811 (14) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC)
NCT03684811 (14) [back to overview]Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax)
NCT03684811 (14) [back to overview]Time of Peak Plasma Concentration (Tmax)
NCT03684811 (14) [back to overview]Apparent Clearance (CL/F)
NCT03745716 (1) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate (CR)
NCT03813147 (8) [back to overview]Maximum Time to Concentration of MLN4924 (Pevonedistat) Added to the 3-drug Backbone of Azacitidine (Aza), Fludarabine, and Cytarabine Re-induction for Pediatric Patients With Recurrent/Refractory AML and MDS
NCT03813147 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events Attributable to MLN4924 (Pevonedistat)
NCT03813147 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Antitumor Activity of MLN4924 (Pevonedistat)
NCT03813147 (8) [back to overview]Elimination Half-life of MLN4924 (Pevonedistat) Added to the 3-drug Backbone of Azacitidine (Aza), Fludarabine, and Cytarabine Re-induction for Pediatric Patients With Recurrent/Refractory AML and MDS
NCT03813147 (8) [back to overview]Maximum Concentration of MLN4924 (Pevonedistat) Added to the 3-drug Backbone of Azacitidine (Aza), Fludarabine, and Cytarabine Re-induction for Pediatric Patients With Recurrent/Refractory AML and MDS
NCT03813147 (8) [back to overview]Total Plasma Clearance of MLN4924 (Pevonedistat) Added to the 3-drug Backbone of Azacitidine (Aza), Fludarabine, and Cytarabine Re-induction for Pediatric Patients With Recurrent/Refractory AML and MDS
NCT03813147 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities of MLN4924 (Pevonedistat)
NCT03813147 (8) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve of MLN4924 (Pevonedistat) Added to the 3-drug Backbone of Azacitidine (Aza), Fludarabine, and Cytarabine Re-induction for Pediatric Patients With Recurrent/Refractory AML and MDS
NCT03941964 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission or Complete Remission With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CR + CRi)
NCT03941964 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi)
NCT03941964 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Post-baseline Transfusion Independence
NCT03941964 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR)
NCT04146038 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events Incidence With of Salicylate + Venetoclax + Decitabine
NCT04146038 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complete or Partial Response
NCT04266795 (1) [back to overview]Event-Free Survival (EFS)
NCT04842604 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (AE) and Treatment Related AE
NCT04842604 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Treatment Related SAEs

Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Median Time to Transformation to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or Death From Any Cause, Whichever Occurred First

The time to transformation to AML or death from any cause (whichever occurred first) was defined as the number of days from the date of randomization until the date of documented AML transformation or death from any cause. Patients who did not transform to AML or die were censored at the date of last follow-up. (NCT00071799)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine13.02
Conventional Care7.61

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Median Time to Transformation to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

The time to transformation to AML was defined as the number of days from the date of randomization until the date of documented AML transformation, defined as a bone marrow blast count ≥ 30% independent of baseline bone marrow count. Patients who did not transform to AML were censored at the date of last follow-up or date of death. (NCT00071799)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine20.66
Conventional Care15.44

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Median Time to Transformation to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Based on the Last Bone Marrow Assessment

A sensitivity analysis of time to transformation to AML during the entire study was performed based on the last bone marrow assessment. Patients were censored based on the last bone marrow assessment. (NCT00071799)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine17.80
Conventional Care11.48

[back to top]

Number of Infections Per Treatment Year Requiring Intravenous Antibiotics, Antifungals or Antivirals

The on-treatment adverse event rate of infection requiring IV antibiotics, antifungals, or antivirals per patient-years. The on-treatment period was considered the period from the date of randomization to the last treatment study visit. (NCT00071799)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months

Interventioninfections per treatment year (Number)
Azacitidine0.16
Conventional Care0.24

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Died

Count of participants who died during the study (NCT00071799)
Timeframe: 42 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Azacitidine82
Conventional Care113

[back to top]

Time to Disease Progression, Relapse After Complete or Partial Remission, or Death From Any Cause

The time to disease progression, relapse after complete or partial remission (CR, PR), or death from any cause was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the first date of documented disease progression, relapse after CR or PR, or death from any cause. (NCT00071799)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine14.13
Conventional Care8.82

[back to top]

Number of Participants Considered Hematologic Responders by Investigator Determinations Using International Working Group (IWG 2000) Criteria for Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)

"Investigator determined responses followed IWG criteria for~complete remission(CR): repeat bone marrow show <5% myeloblasts, and peripheral blood evaluations lasting >=2 months of hemoglobin(>110 g/L), neutrophils(>=1.5x10^9/L), platelets(>=100x10^9/L), blasts (0%) and no dysplasia~partial remission(PR) is the same as CR for peripheral blood: bone marrow shows blasts decrease by >=50% or a less advanced FAB classification from pretreatment~stable disease(SD) is a failure to achieve at least a partial remission, but with no evidence of progression for at least 2 months." (NCT00071799)
Timeframe: Day 1 to 42 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Overall (Complete + Partial Remission)Complete RemissionPartial RemissionStable Disease
Azacitidine51302175
Conventional Care2114765

[back to top]

Number of Participants in Different Categories of Adverse Experiences During Core Study Period

Patient counts for a variety of subsets of adverse experiences for the core study period (day 1 to 42 months). The individual options for Conventional Care Regimens (Best Supportive Care Only, Low-Dose Cytarabine, and Standard Chemotherapy) are presented as separate treatments. (NCT00071799)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Patients with >=1 treatment emergent AE (TEAE)Patients with >=1 treatment related TEAEPatients with >=1 serious TEAEPatients with >=1 serious treatment related TEAEPatients w TEAE leading to discontinued treatmentPatients w TEAE leading to dose reductionPatients w TEAE leading to dose interruption
Azacitidine17516911443222082
Best Supportive Care Only971710400
Low-dose Cytarabine443427136212
Standard Chemotherapy19191413200

[back to top]

Number of Participants Showing Hematologic Improvement Using International Working Group (IWG 2000) Criteria for Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Assessed by Independent Review Committee

"IWG 2000 Criteria: Pretreatment=hemoglobin <100g/L or RBC transfusion-dependent, platelet count <100x10^9/L or platelet transfusion dependent, absolute neutrophil count <1.5x10^9/L.~Erythroid response: Major->20g/L increase or transfusion independent. Minor- 10-20g/L increase or >=50% decrease in transfusion requirements.~Platelet response: Major-absolute increase of >=30x10^9/L or platelet transfusion independence. Minor->=50% increase.~Neutrophil response: Major->=100% increase or an absolute increase of >0.5x10^9/L. Minor->=100% increase and absolute increase of <0.5x10^9/L." (NCT00071799)
Timeframe: Day 1 to 42 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any Improvement n=177, 178Erythroid Response - Major n=157, 160Erythroid Response - Minor n=157, 160Platelet Response - Major n=141, 129Platelet Response - Minor n=138, 127Neutrophil Response - Major n=131, 111Neutrophil Response - Minor n=131, 111
Azacitidine87622466255
Conventional Care51171184209

[back to top]

Summary of Participants' Platelet Transfusion Status for Participants Who Were Transfusion Dependent at Baseline

Summary of dependence and independence from platelet transfusion at baseline and during treatment for patients who were dependent at baseline. A patient was considered transfusion independent at baseline if the patient had no transfusions during the 56 days prior to randomization. During study, a patient was considered transfusion independent during the on-treatment period if the patient had no transfusions during any 56 consecutive days or more. Otherwise, the patient was considered transfusion dependent. (NCT00071799)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline Dependent; On-Treatment IndependentBaseline Dependent; On-Treatment Dependent
Azacitidine1622
Conventional Care1116

[back to top]

Summary of Participants' Platelet Transfusion Status for Participants Who Were Transfusion Independent at Baseline

Summary of dependence and independence from platelet transfusion at baseline and during treatment for patients who were independent at baseline. A patient was considered transfusion independent at baseline if the patient had no transfusions during the 56 days prior to randomization. During study, a patient was considered transfusion independent during the on-treatment period if the patient had no transfusions during any 56 consecutive days or more. Otherwise, the patient was considered transfusion dependent. (NCT00071799)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline Independent; On-Treatment IndependentBaseline Independent; On-Treatment Dependent
Azacitidine12615
Conventional Care10250

[back to top]

Summary of Participants' Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Status for Participants Who Were Transfusion Dependent at Baseline

Summary of dependence and independence from red blood cell (RBC) transfusion at baseline and during treatment, for patients who were dependent at baseline. A patient was considered transfusion independent at baseline if the patient had no transfusions during the 56 days prior to randomization. During study, a patient was considered transfusion independent during the on-treatment period if the patient had no transfusions during any 56 consecutive days or more. Otherwise, the patient was considered transfusion dependent. (NCT00071799)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline Dependent; On-Treatment IndependentBaseline Dependent; On-Treatment Dependent
Azacitidine5061
Conventional Care13101

[back to top]

Summary of Participants' Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Status for Participants Who Were Transfusion Independent at Baseline

Summary of dependence and independence from red blood cell (RBC) transfusion at baseline and during treatment, for patients who were independent at baseline. A patient was considered transfusion independent at baseline if the patient had no transfusions during the 56 days prior to randomization. During study, a patient was considered transfusion independent during the on-treatment period if the patient had no transfusions during any 56 consecutive days or more. Otherwise, the patient was considered transfusion dependent. (NCT00071799)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline Independent; On-Treatment IndependentBaseline Independent; On-Treatment Dependent
Azacitidine5810
Conventional Care3728

[back to top]

Duration of Any Hematologic Improvement

The duration of improvement was defined as the time from the date of hematologic improvement until the date of first documented progression or relapse after hematologic improvement or death from any cause. (NCT00071799)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine13.57
Conventional Care5.18

[back to top]

Summary of Subgroup Analyses for Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Death From Any Cause

"Kaplan-Meier estimates for the median months until death from any cause within the intent-to-treat population. Patients surviving at the end of the follow-up period were censored at the date of last contact. If a patient withdrew consent to follow-up or was lost to follow-up, the patient was censored as of the last date of contact.~Subgroups that were analyzed are age, gender, French-American-British (FAB) classification, World Health Organization (WHO) classification and International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) classification." (NCT00071799)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months

,
Interventionmonths (Number)
Age <65 yearsAge >= 65 yearsAge >= 75 yearsGender: MaleGender: FemaleFAB: Refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB)FAB: RAEB in transformationWHO: RAEB 1WHO: RAEB 2WHO: Other (AML, CMMoL-1 and 2, indeterminate)IPSS: Intermediate 2IPSS: High
Azacitidine11.3124.468.9224.4625.1134.6617.2511.5421.1120.4634.6619.21
Conventional Care7.8713.876.2015.0214.8515.2115.256.7215.0215.2516.8914.52

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Median Time to Death From Any Cause

Kaplan-Meier estimates for the median months until death from any cause within the intent-to-treat population. Patients surviving at the end of the follow-up period were censored at the date of last contact. If a patient withdrew consent to follow-up or was lost to follow-up, the patient was censored as of the last date of contact. (NCT00071799)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) to 42 months

Interventionmonths (Number)
Azacitidine24.46
Conventional Care15.02

[back to top]

Frequency of Adverse Events According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0

Summary of Adverse Events (AEs) by Maximum Grade where Grade 1 AEs >20%, Grade 2 AEs >10%, all Grade 3, Grade 4 and Grade 5 reported. (NCT00085293)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Grade 1, NauseaGrade 1, FatigueGrade 1, Oral MucositisGrade 1, Pharyngolaryngeal painGrade 1, Decreased white blood cellGrade 2, FatigueGrade 2, Decreased white blood cellGrade 2, Neutrophil count decreasedGrade 2, Lymphocyte count decreasedGrade 3, Decreased white blood cellGrade 3, Neutrophil count decreasedGrade 3, Febrile neutropeniaGrade 3, InfectionsGrade 3, respiratory disordersGrade 4, Decreased white blood cellGrade 5
Treatment4233252525252516164225888580

[back to top]

Restoration of Radioiodine Uptake in Metastatic Lesions as Demonstrated by Diagnostic Whole-body Scanning After Decitabine Administration

"Number of participants with restoration of radioiodine responsiveness as determined by visible uptake on radioiodine scan in radiographically detectable metastatic foci of papillary or follicular thyroid carcinoma. Response to Decitabine defined as demonstration of radioiodine uptake determined by centralized blinded review of diagnostic scan. All who demonstrated radioiodine uptake in metastatic foci following decitabine therapy would then undergo thyroid hormone withdrawal and a second course of decitabine in preparation for therapeutic administration of radioiodine.~Diagnostic radioiodine scans following decitabine therapy (week 3) with a radioiodine scan following thyrotropin alfa stimulation, 0.9 mg intramuscular (IM) injection 24 and 48 hours before administration of the 131I for imaging. Whole body scans (WBS) performed using a gamma camera." (NCT00085293)
Timeframe: Week 3 following 2 weeks of Decitabine therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment0

[back to top]

Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Status at Baseline and End of Maintenance Study Period (24 Months)

Shift table comparing the RBC transfusion status of patients at the end of the maintenance study period to the transfusion status at baseline. (NCT00102687)
Timeframe: 24 months

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline Dependent (n=6,12,12) - 24 mo IndependentBaseline Dependent (n=6,12,12) - 24 mo DependentBaseline Independent(n=16,9,15)- 24 mo IndependentBaseline Independent (n=16,9,15) - 24 mo Dependent
Initial Period Treatment Continued Into Maintenance102150
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 4 Weeks51151
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 6 Weeks12090

[back to top]

Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Status at Baseline and End of Initial Study Period (6 Months)

Shift table comparing the RBC transfusion status of patients at the end of the initial study period to the transfusion status at baseline. (NCT00102687)
Timeframe: 6 months

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline Dependent(n=25,24,22) - 6 mo IndependentBaseline Dependent(n=25,24,22) - 6 mo DependentBaseline Independent(n=25,26,29)- 6 mo IndependentBaseline Independent(n=25,26,29) - 6 mo Dependent
Aza-5169196
Aza-5-2-214101610
Aza-5-2-51391910

[back to top]

Platelet Transfusion Status at Baseline and End of Maintenance Study Period (24 Months)

Shift table comparing the platelet transfusion status of patients at the end of the maintenance study period to the transfusion status at baseline. (NCT00102687)
Timeframe: 24 months

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline Dependent (n=1,1,2) - 24 mo IndependentBaseline Dependent (n=1,1,2) - 24 mo DependentBaseline Independent(n=21,20,25)-24 mo IndependentBaseline Independent(n=21,20,25) - 24 mo Dependent
Initial Period Treatment Continued Into Maintenance20250
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 4 Weeks10210
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 6 Weeks10200

[back to top]

Platelet Transfusion Status at Baseline and End of Initial Study Period (6 Months)

Shift table comparing the platelet transfusion status of patients at the end of the initial study period to the transfusion status at baseline. (NCT00102687)
Timeframe: 6 months

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline Dependent (n=4,2,1) - 6 mo IndependentBaseline Dependent (n=4,2,1) - 6 mo DependentBaseline Independent(n=46,48,50)- 6 mo IndependentBaseline Independent (n=46,48,50) - 6 mo Dependent
Aza-531433
Aza-5-2-220426
Aza-5-2-501419

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Best Hematological Improvement Derived Using International Working Group 2000 (IWG 2000) Criteria for MDS During the Initial Study Period.

"IWG 2000 Criteria: Pretreatment=hemoglobin <110g/L or RBC transfusion-dependence, platelet count <100x10^9/L or platelet transfusion dependence, absolute neutrophil count <1.5x10^9/L.~Erythroid response: Major->20g/L increase in hemoglobin or transfusion independence. Minor- 10-20g/L increase in hemoglobin or >=50% decrease in transfusion requirements.~Platelet response: Major-absolute increase of platelet count by >=30x10^9/L or platelet transfusion independence. Minor->=50% increase in platelet count with net increase >10x10^9/L but <30x10^9/L.~(continued in Population Description)" (NCT00102687)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) to 6 months

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any Improvement n=50,49,47Erythroid response - Major n=44,43,41Erythroid response - Minor n=44,43,41Platelet response - Major n=24,28,28Platelet response - Minor n=24,28,28Neutrophil response - Major n=24,22,16Neutrophil response - Minor n=24,22,16
Aza-52918410242
Aza-5-2-22015111030
Aza-5-2-52618210030

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Improved or Maintained The Hematologic Response From the Initial Study Period (Based on IWG 2000 Criteria For MDS) During the Maintenance Period

Hematologic response during the maintenance period are compared to the response in the initial study period. Initial response could have been a complete remission, a partial remission, stable disease or a hematologic improvement. Maintenance period best response is after randomization to a maintenance arm for those randomized, and is after the start of cycle 7 for those remaining on initial period treatment throughout the study. (NCT00102687)
Timeframe: 24 months

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Improved response from initial study periodMaintained response from initial study period
Initial Period Treatment Continued Into Maintenance1210
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 4 Weeks76
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 6 Weeks105

[back to top]

Number of Participants In Best Hematological Response Categories as Determined by the Investigator Using International Working Group 2000 (IWG 2000) Criteria For Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) During the Initial Study Period.

"Participant counts by best hematological response; complete remission(CR) is better than a partial remission(PR) which is better than stable disease(SD).~Investigator determined responses followed IWG 2000 criteria for MDS CR: repeat bone marrow show <5% myeloblasts, and peripheral blood evaluations lasting >=2 months of hemoglobin(>110 g/L), neutrophils(>=1.5x10^9/L), platelets(>=100x10^9/L), blasts (0%) and no dysplasia PR is the same as CR for peripheral blood: bone marrow shows blasts decrease by >=50% or a less advanced FAB classification from pretreatment (see Population Descrip)" (NCT00102687)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) to 6 months

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Overall Response (CR+PR)Complete remission (CR)Partial remission (PR)Stable disease
Aza-542222
Aza-5-2-232119
Aza-5-2-542220

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Overall Best Hematologic Response and Hematologic Improvement Based on IWG 2000 Criteria For MDS During the Initial Study Period

Number of participants whose best hematological outcome was either complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR) (as determined by the investigator), or any hematologic improvement (based on the IWG 2000 criteria for MDS). See previous outcomes for detailed definitions. (NCT00102687)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) to 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Aza-530
Aza-5-2-220
Aza-5-2-527

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Number of Infections Requiring Treatment With IV Antibiotics Per Treatment Cycle (28 Days) for the Maintenance Study Period

Baseline uses the average number of infections requiring IV antibiotic treatment from the 28 days prior to and including the day of first dose to an initial treatment arm. Maintenance study period values total the number of infections requiring IV antibiotic treatment divided by the number of treatment cycles (each cycle is approximately one month). (NCT00102687)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventioninfections per cycle (Median)
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 4 Weeks0.00
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 6 Weeks0.00
Initial Period Treatment Continued Into Maintenance0.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Number of Infections Requiring Treatment With IV Antibiotics Per Treatment Cycle (28 Days) for the Initial Study Period

Baseline uses the average number of infections requiring IV antibiotic treatment from the 28 days prior to and including the day of first dose to an initial treatment arm. Initial study period values total the number of infections requiring IV antibiotic treatment divided by the number of treatment cycles (each cycle is approximately one month). (NCT00102687)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventioninfections per cycle (Median)
Aza-50.00
Aza-5-2-20.00
Aza-5-2-50.00

[back to top]

Baseline Platelet Values

The median values for platelets based on blood tests performed on study day 1 (prior to study treatment) constitute a baseline measure for platelets. Baseline values are used to compare to values following treatment. (NCT00102687)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization)

Interventionx10(9)/L (Median)
Aza-5110.0
Aza-5-2-290.0
Aza-5-2-586.0

[back to top]

Baseline Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) Values

The median values for ANC based on blood tests performed on study day 1 (prior to study treatment) constitute a baseline measure for ANC. Baseline values are used to compare to values following treatment. (NCT00102687)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization)

Interventionx10^9/L (Median)
Aza-51.6
Aza-5-2-21.9
Aza-5-2-52.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Platelets at the End of Initial Study Period (6 Months)

The difference between platelet values at the end of the initial study period minus the platelet values at baseline. (NCT00102687)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionx10^9/L (Median)
Aza-54.8
Aza-5-2-25.7
Aza-5-2-512.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Platelets at the End of the Maintenance Study Period (Month 24)

The difference between platelet values at the end of the maintenance study period minus the platelet values at baseline. (NCT00102687)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionx10^9/L (Median)
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 4 Weeks19.8
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 6 Weeks7.7
Initial Period Treatment Continued Into Maintenance17.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at the End of the Maintenance Study Period

The difference between hemoglobin values at the end of the maintenance study period minus the hemoglobin values at baseline. (NCT00102687)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventiong/L (Median)
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 4 Weeks5.9
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 6 Weeks7.3
Initial Period Treatment Continued Into Maintenance14.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at End of Initial Study Period (6 Months)

The difference between hemoglobin values at the end of the initial study period minus the hemoglobin values at baseline. (NCT00102687)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventiong/L (Median)
Aza-52.3
Aza-5-2-22.9
Aza-5-2-55.3

[back to top]

Baseline Hemoglobin Values

The median values for hemoglobin based on blood tests performed on study day 1 (prior to study treatment) constitute a baseline measure for hemoglobin. Baseline values are used to compare to values following treatment. (NCT00102687)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization)

Interventiong/L (Median)
Aza-594.0
Aza-5-2-298.0
Aza-5-2-595.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) at the End of the Maintenance Study Period (Month 24)

The difference between ANC values at the end of the maintenance study period minus the ANC values at baseline. (NCT00102687)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionx10^9/L (Median)
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 4 Weeks-0.1
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 6 Weeks-0.2
Initial Period Treatment Continued Into Maintenance-0.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) at the End of Initial Study Period (6 Months)

The difference between ANC values at the end of the initial study period minus the ANC values at baseline. (NCT00102687)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionx10^9/L (Median)
Aza-5-0.3
Aza-5-2-2-0.3
Aza-5-2-5-0.4

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With Clinical Response

"Clinical response is defined as a complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or trilineage response (TR) graded according to the following criteria:~World Health Organization classification of the acute leukemias and myelodysplastic syndrome (by Bennett)~Myelodysplastic syndromes standardized response criteria: further definition (by Cheson et al.)~Report of an international working group to standardize response criteria for myelodysplastic syndromes (by Cheson et al.)" (NCT00313586)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months if patient is < 2 years from study entry, every 6 months if patient is 2 - 5 years from study entry.

InterventionProportion of patients (Number)
Arm A (Azacitidine; Non-treatment-induced Cohort)0.32
Arm B (Azacitidine + Entinostat; Non-treatment-induced Cohort)0.27
Arm A (Azacitidine; Treatment-induced Cohort)0.46
Arm B (Azacitidine + Entinostat; Treatment-induced Cohort)0.17

[back to top]

Platelet Transfusion

Occurrence of one or more platelet transfusions from study day 1 through the interim follow-up visit (16 weeks) (NCT00321711)
Timeframe: Study day 1 through the interim follow-up visit (up to 20 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Romiplostim (AMG 531) Placebo Plus Azacitidine9
Romiplostim (AMG 531) 500 mcg Plus Azacitidine6
Romiplostim (AMG 531) 750 mcg Plus Azacitidine5
Romiplostim (AMG 531) Placebo Plus Decitabine8
Romiplostim (AMG 531) 750 mcg Plus Decitabine7

[back to top]

Occurrence of a Clinically Significant Thrombocytopenic Event

Occurrence of a clinically significant thrombocytopenic event within the participant, defined as any platelet count obtained from day 15 of cycle 1 through the end of the interim follow-up visit that was less than 50 x 10^9/L or receipt of platelet transfusions at any time through the interim follow-up visit. (NCT00321711)
Timeframe: Treatment period (up to 20 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Romiplostim (AMG 531) Placebo Plus Azacitidine11
Romiplostim (AMG 531) 500 mcg Plus Azacitidine8
Romiplostim (AMG 531) 750 mcg Plus Azacitidine10
Romiplostim (AMG 531) Placebo Plus Decitabine11
Romiplostim (AMG 531) 750 mcg Plus Decitabine12

[back to top]

Hypomethylating Agent Dose Reduction and Delay Due to Thrombocytopenia

Occurrence of hypomethylating agent dose reduction and delay due to thrombocytopenia (NCT00321711)
Timeframe: Treatment period (up to 20 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Romiplostim (AMG 531) Placebo Plus Azacitidine1
Romiplostim (AMG 531) 500 mcg Plus Azacitidine1
Romiplostim (AMG 531) 750 mcg Plus Azacitidine0
Romiplostim (AMG 531) Placebo Plus Decitabine0
Romiplostim (AMG 531) 750 mcg Plus Decitabine0

[back to top]

Achieving an Overall Response (Complete or Partial Response, CR or PR) at the End of the Treatment Period

CR = decrease in bone marrow blast (≤5%) and improvement in peripheral blood counts (Hgb ≥ 11 g/dL, platelets ≥ 100x10^9/L, neutrophils ≥ 1x10^9/L, peripheral blasts=0%). PR = improvement in peripheral blood counts plus a decrease in bone marrow blasts ≥50% but not ≤5, or decrease in International Prognostic Scoring System score. (NCT00321711)
Timeframe: Treatment period (up to 20 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Romiplostim (AMG 531) Placebo Plus Azacitidine2
Romiplostim (AMG 531) 500 mcg Plus Azacitidine1
Romiplostim (AMG 531) 750 mcg Plus Azacitidine1
Romiplostim (AMG 531) Placebo Plus Decitabine3
Romiplostim (AMG 531) 750 mcg Plus Decitabine5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Response

Clinical activity of combination defined as: Complete Response (CR), bone marrow with 5% or fewer blasts and peripheral blood count with an absolute neutrophil count of 10^9/L or more and platelet count of 100x10^9 or more; Complete response without platelets (CRp), a complete response except for a platelet count less than 100x10^9 and transfusion independent; and Bone Marrow (BM) Response, bone marrow blast of 5% or less but without meeting the peripheral blood count criteria for (CR) or (CRp). (NCT00326170)
Timeframe: Up to 12 cycles of treatment (28 day cycles)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
CRCRpBM
VPA + 5-aza + ATRA1237

[back to top]

PHASE II: Determine the Number of Patients With Responses for Efficacy(Measured as Response Rate)

"For the Phase II study portion, to determine the efficacy (measured as response rate) of the combination therapy as defined by the International Working Group (IWG) criteria (CR, complete remission; PR, partial remission; or HI, hematological improvement.~Complete response (CR) is defined as: Disappearance of the chromosomal abnormality without appearance of new ones.~Partial response (PR) is defined as: At least 50% reduction of the chromosomal abnormality.~Hematologic Improvement (HI) is defined as: red blood cell increase of >=1.5g/dL, a platelet response of >=30X10^9/L or by at least 100% for values starting <20X10^9/L, or a neutrophil response of at least 100% and absolute increase of >0.5X10^9/L" (NCT00352001)
Timeframe: After 4 courses (4 months)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lenalidomide and Azacitidine26

[back to top] [back to top]

Overall Survival Among Patients With Complete Response

Time (in months) patients who achieved a complete response using the RECIST criteria were alive on study (NCT00352001)
Timeframe: After 7 months of treatment, until the date of first documented myeloid leukemia or death, whichever came first, assessed up to 55 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Lenalidomide and Azacitidine37

[back to top]

PHASE I: Maximum Tolerated Dose of Azacitidine

"Participants will be enrolled on the Phase I study portion in blocks of 3 to varying doses of Revlimid® (lenalidomide) and Vidaza® (azacitidine) (Table 1). To determine the MTD, a standard 3+3 design will be used. DLT will be assessed during the first cycle of therapy within each treatment group. No Maximum dose was reach but the go-forward dose agreed upon by the investigators is reported here." (NCT00352001)
Timeframe: After 1 courses (1 months)

Interventionmg/m2 subcutaneously for 5 days (Number)
Lenalidomide and Azacitidine75

[back to top]

PHASE I: Maximum Tolerated Dose of Lenalidomide

"Participants will be enrolled on the Phase I study portion in blocks of 3 to varying doses of Revlimid® (lenalidomide) and Vidaza® (azacitidine) (Table 1). To determine the MTD, a standard 3+3 design will be used. DLT will be assessed during the first cycle of therapy within each treatment group. No Maximum dose was reach but the go-forward dose agreed upon by the investigators is reported here." (NCT00352001)
Timeframe: After 1 courses (1 months)

Interventionmg orally for 21 days (Number)
Lenalidomide and Azacitidine10

[back to top]

PHASE II: Determine the Number of Patients With Responses for Efficacy(Measured as Response Rate)

"For the Phase II study portion, to determine the efficacy (measured as response rate) of the combination therapy as defined by the International Working Group (IWG) criteria (CR, complete remission; PR, partial remission; or HI, hematological improvement)~Complete response (CR) is defined as: Disappearance of the chromosomal abnormality without appearance of new ones.~Partial response (PR) is defined as: At least 50% reduction of the chromosomal abnormality.~Hematologic Improvement (HI) is defined as: red blood cell increase of >=1.5g/dL, a platelet response of >=30X10^9/L or by at least 100% for values starting <20X10^9/L, or a neutrophil response of at least 100% and absolute increase of >0.5X10^9/L" (NCT00352001)
Timeframe: After 7 courses (months)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lenalidomide and Azacitidine26

[back to top]

Time to Relapse After Achieving Complete Response

(NCT00352001)
Timeframe: After 7 months of treatment, until the date of first documented myeloid leukemia or death, whichever came first, assessed up to 55 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Lenalidomide and Azacitidine17

[back to top]

Time to Transformation to Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Death

Time (in months) patients took to evolve to myeloid leukemia or death after achieving a complete response using the RECIST criteria (NCT00352001)
Timeframe: After 7 months of treatment, until the date of first documented myeloid leukemia or death, whichever came first, assessed up to 55 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Lenalidomide and Azacitidine13.6

[back to top]

Analysis of CD34, CD71, CD36 Cells in Aspirated Bone Marrow for Both Responders and Non-responders at Baseline and After Three and Six Cycles

(NCT00379912)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
Interventioncells of BM (10e^6/ML) (Mean)
CD34 BaselineCD34 After Three CyclesCD34 After Six CyclesCD71 at BaselineCD71 After Three CyclesCD71 After Six CyclesCD36 at BaselineCD36 after Three CyclesCD36 after Six Cycles
Non-Responders.49.58.527.2310.139.695.126.083.57
Responders.86.931.1518.3227.3135.4511.6914.3321.35

[back to top]

Overall Response After Cycle 3

"Overall response for participants who have completed at least three cycles of protocol-specified therapy according to the International Working Group to Standardize Response Criteria for Myelodysplastic Syndromes criteria for Erythroid Response (HI-E) Major response: For patients with pretreatment hemoglobin less than 11 g/dL, greater than 2 g/dL increase in hemoglobin; for RBC transfusion-dependent patients, transfusion independence.~Minor response: For patients with pretreatment hemoglobin less than 11 g/dL, 1 to 2 g/dL increase in hemoglobin; for RBC transfusion-dependent patients, 50% decrease in transfusion requirements." (NCT00379912)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionpercentage of participants responding (Number)
Arm A Azacitidine + Erythropoietin50
Arm B Azacitidine33.3

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate After Six Cycles

"Overall response rate for participants who have completed at least six cycles of protocol-specified therapy according to the International Working Group to Standardize Response Criteria for Myelodysplastic Syndromes criteria for Erythroid Response (HI-E) Major response: For patients with pretreatment hemoglobin less than 11 g/dL, greater than 2 g/dL increase in hemoglobin; for RBC transfusion-dependent patients, transfusion independence.~Minor response: For patients with pretreatment hemoglobin less than 11 g/dL, 1 to 2 g/dL increase in hemoglobin; for RBC transfusion-dependent patients, 50% decrease in transfusion requirements." (NCT00379912)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants responding (Number)
Arm B Azacitidine33.3
Arm A Azacitidine + Erythropoietin33.3

[back to top]

Safety Profile of the Modified Dose/Schedule of Azacitidine and Erythropoietin or a Modified Dose of Azacitidine Alone

Full adverse event information is submitted in the record below. A summary of the Significant Toxicities Rate (clinically significant myelosuppression (CTCAE Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia)) over all patients receiving at least 1 dose of study medication at the time of interim analysis is reported in this outcome measure. (NCT00379912)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A Azacitidine + Erythropoietin66.7
Arm B Azacitidine66.4

[back to top]

BclXL Expression

(NCT00379912)
Timeframe: Six months

,
Interventionpercentage L27 mRNA (Mean)
BclXL Expression at baselineBclXL Expression after three cyclesBclXL Expression after six cycles
Non-Responders1.00.771.21
Responders1.01.503.89

[back to top]

Percent Apoptosis in 34+36+71+ Cells at Baseline, Three Cycles and Six Cycles

(NCT00379912)
Timeframe: Six months

,
Interventionpercentage of cells (Mean)
% apoptosis at baseline% apoptosis after three cycles% apoptosis after six cycles
Non-Responders31.1963.4338.10
Responders17.0424.7042.58

[back to top] [back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from registration to death due to any cause or time from registration to 3 years after registration if patient is still alive. (NCT00381693)
Timeframe: From date of registration until death or 3 years after registration if patient is still alive

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine16.9

[back to top]

Patients With Confirmed Response (Complete Remission or Partial Remission on 2 Consecutive Evaluation at Least 4 Weeks Apart) During the First 4 Months of Treatment

"Response Definitions:~Completion Remission (CR):complete resolution of disease-related symptoms, ultrasound-documented resolution of hepastosplenomegaly, normalization of the peripheral blood count, white cell differential, and smear, normalization of bone marrow histology including disappearance of fibrosis and osteosclerosis. Residual cytogenetic abnormalities are allowed.~Partial Remission (PR): a major response in any baseline applicable criteria (except constitutional symptoms) without progression in any other category." (NCT00381693)
Timeframe: 4 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Azacitidine0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Response

Patient response defined by: Death, Resistant to Therapy [no major hematologic improvement using International Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Working Group (Cheson B, Bennett J, Kantarjian H et al, Blood 2006) criteria after a maximum of 4 courses], or Relapse. (NCT00382590)
Timeframe: Evaluated every 3 weeks, following 4 courses (16/24 weeks ) and till study end

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
DeathResistant to TherapyRelapse
5-Aza + VPA040
Ara-C050

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate by Recist (ORR)

ORR = Complete Response (CR) + Parcial response (PR). CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD. (NCT00384839)
Timeframe: Every 8 weeks for 1 year.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Vidaza0

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With PSA Doubling Time >=3 Months.

To determine if Vidaza can convert hormone-refractory prostate cancer to a hormone-responsive state. This will be assessed by the proportion of patients who have a documented prostate specific antigen (PSA) doubling time >3= months. (NCT00384839)
Timeframe: Until progression or up to a maximum of 12 cycles

Intervention% of patients with PSA-DT>= 3 months (Number)
Vidaza55.8

[back to top]

Changes in Fetal Hemoglobin (HbF) With Time.

Time from baseline to maximal fetal hemoglobin (HbF). (NCT00384839)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year.

Interventionweeks (Median)
Vidaza12.7

[back to top]

1-year Overall Survival (OS)

OS is measured from the date of randomization to the date of death for a dead patient. If a patient is still alive or is lost to follow up, the patient will be censored at the last contact date. (NCT00384839)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year.

InterventionProbability of Survival at 1-year (Number)
Vidaza0.73

[back to top]

PSA Response Rate

Complete PSA Response defined as complete normalization of PSA maintained for at least 4 weeks, and partial PSA response defined as a decrease in PSA level of at least 50% from baseline level maintained for at least 4 weeks. (NCT00384839)
Timeframe: Every 8 weeks for 1 year.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Vidaza0

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

"PFS is measured from the date of randomization to the date of first documented disease progression or date of death, whichever comes first. If a patient neither progresses nor dies, this patient will be censored at last contact date.~Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions." (NCT00384839)
Timeframe: Up to 1.5 year.

Interventionweeks (Median)
Vidaza12.4

[back to top]

Rate of Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the date of first dose of study drug to the date of death from any cause. (NCT00384956)
Timeframe: 2 years after first dose of study drug or until participant is lost to follow-up or dies

Interventiondays (Median)
Azacitidine444

[back to top]

Time to Best Response

(NCT00384956)
Timeframe: 4 weeks following last dose of azacitidine [median number of cycles 4.5 (1-20)]

Interventiondays (Median)
Azacitidine108

[back to top]

Rate of Complete Remission (CR) and Partial Remission (PR)

"Defined according to the modified International Working Group (IWG) (2006) response criteria for myelodysplasia:~CR=bone marrow with <5% myeloblasts and 0% peripheral blasts, hemoglobin ≥11g/dL, platelets ≥ 100 x 10^9/L, and neutrophils ≥1.0 x 10^9/L. Residual dysplasia was allowed.~PR= All of the CR criteria if abnormal before treatment except: bone marrow blasts decreased by ≥50% over pretreatment but still >5%." (NCT00384956)
Timeframe: After 4 cycles of therapy (up to 112 days after start of treatment)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete remission (CR)Partial remission (PR)
Azacitidine51

[back to top]

Rate of Transfusion Independence

(NCT00384956)
Timeframe: 4 weeks following last azacitidine dose [median number of cycles 4.5 (1-20)]

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Red blood cellPlateletRed blood cell and platelet
Azacitidine210

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR)

(NCT00384956)
Timeframe: 2 years after first dose of study drug or until participant is lost to follow-up or dies

Interventiondays (Median)
Azacitidine450

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

"PFS is defined as the interval from the date of first dose of study drug to date of treatment failure, recurrence, or death due to any cause.~Disease progression~for patients w/ <5% blasts; a ≥50% increase in blasts to >5% blasts~for patients w/ 5% to 10% blasts; a ≥50 increase to >10% blasts~for patients w/ 10% to 20% blasts; a ≥50% increase to >20% blasts~for patients w/ 20% to 30% blasts; a ≥50% increase to >30% blasts~One or more of the following ≥50% decrement from maximum remission/response levels in granulocytes or platelets, reduction in hemoglobin concentration by ≥2 g/dL or transfusion dependence" (NCT00384956)
Timeframe: 2 years after first dose of study drug or until participant is lost to follow-up or dies

Interventiondays (Median)
Azacitidine339

[back to top]

Rate of Hematologic Improvement

International Working Group (IWG) for Myelodysplasia (MDS). (NCT00384956)
Timeframe: 4 weeks following last azacitidine dose [median number of cycles 4.5 (1-20)]

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Azacitidine0

[back to top]

(Phase I) Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Azacitidine When Given Together With Entinostat as Determined by Number of Participants Experiencing Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT)

DLT is defined by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v3.0 (NCT00387465)
Timeframe: Up to 28 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase I - 30mg/m2 Azacitidine0
Phase I - 40mg/m2 Azacitidine0

[back to top]

Effect of Entinostat and Azacitidine on DNA Methylation and Response

"Number of participants with decrease in DNA methylation (methylation-signature positive) on Day 10 or Day 29, and either stable disease or objective response (OR) as defined by RECIST 1.0. Per RECIST 1.0, progression is defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions; PR is defined as >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, complete response is defined as disappearance of all target lesions; OR=CR+PR." (NCT00387465)
Timeframe: Baseline and days 10 and 29

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Azacitidine 40mg/m2 With Entinostat8

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Determined by the method determined by Kaplan and Meier. 95% confidence intervals will be estimated. (NCT00387465)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine 40mg/m2 With Entinostat6.4

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic Profile of Azacitidine as Measured by AUC (ng*hr/mL)

(NCT00387465)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionng*hr/mL (Mean)
Azacitidine 40mg/m2 With Entinostat675

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic Profile of Azacytidine as Measured by Tmax

Time to maximal concentration of azacitidine in the blood. (NCT00387465)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionhours (Median)
Azacitidine 40mg/m2 With Entinostat0.5

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic Profile of Azacitidine as Measured by Cmax

Maximal concentration (ng/mL) of azacitidine (NCT00387465)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Azacitidine 40mg/m2 With Entinostat468

[back to top]

Average Steady State Trough Concentration (ng/mL) of Entinostat

(NCT00387465)
Timeframe: Day 10 and 17

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Day 10Day 17
Azacitidine 40mg/m2 With Entinostat0.841.10

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. Determined by the method determined by Kaplan and Meier. 95% confidence intervals will be estimated. (NCT00387465)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionweeks (Median)
Azacitidine 40mg/m2 With Entinostat7.4

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic Profile of Azacitidine as Measured by Half-life

(NCT00387465)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionhours (Mean)
Azacitidine 40mg/m2 With Entinostat1.12

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Safety and tolerability of treatment as measured by NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0 (NCT00387647)
Timeframe: 48 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Azacitidine Treatment24

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

The secondary efficacy variable is overall survival measured as time to death, which is the time from remission until death from any cause. (NCT00387647)
Timeframe: 48 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine Treatment20.4

[back to top]

Rate of Disease Free Survival at One Year

The primary efficacy variable is disease free survival measured at one year, which is the percentage of patients who remain alive and disease free one year after the confirmation of remission by bone marrow biopsy. Relapse is defined by a bone marrow specimen with >5% blasts or the presence of Auer rods. (NCT00387647)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Azacitidine Treatment50

[back to top]

Tumor Response Rate (Complete, Partial) of Azacytidine

Overall response rate includes percentage of participants with complete response (CR) plus partial response (PR) responses using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) criteria for response: Complete response defined as no palpable lymph nodes, liver or spleen and absence of symptoms. Neutrophil count > 15,00/Mic L, and platelet count more than 100,000/MicL. Hemoglobin should be > 11g/dl without transfusions. Lymphocyte count <4000/micL. On bone marrow aspirate lymphocyte % should be <30%, and biopsy showing no lymphocyte infiltrate. A partial response was defined as more than or equal to 50% decrease in lymph nodes and liver and spleen size. Neutrophils > 1500/ micL or >50 % improvement from baseline, platelet count >100,000/micL or >50 % improvement from baseline. Hemoglobin >11g/dl or >50% improvement from baseline. A reduction of >50% in Leukocyte count or <30 % lymphocytes with residual disease on biopsy for nodular PR. (NCT00413478)
Timeframe: 3 to 8 weeks treatment cycles, continuation up to 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
5-Azacytidine0

[back to top]

The Primary Objective of the Trial is to Assess the Efficacy of the Combined Use of Valproic Acid (VPA) in Combination With 5-Azacytidine (5-Aza C) in the Treatment of MDS.

Overall survival (NCT00439673)
Timeframe: At 60 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Study Group8.3

[back to top]

Time to Transformation to AML

(NCT00439673)
Timeframe: At 60 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Study Group53.9

[back to top]

Evaluate the Safety and Toxicity of Azacitidine (5-azacytidine, Vidaza®) and Cisplatin Combination

Although response is not the primary endpoint of this trial, patients with measurable disease will by assessed by standard criteria. For the purpose of this study, patients should be re-evaluated every 8 weeks by imaging study. In addition to baseline scan, confirmatory scans will also be obtained 4 weeks following initial documentation of an objective response. (NCT00443261)
Timeframe: Weeks 1-12, 24, 36

Intervention ()
Arm 1: SCCHN0

[back to top]

Measurement of DNMT Protein in Peripheral Blood or Bone Marrow Cells

Expression studies were conducted using quantitative RT PCR. Expression of DNMT were normalized to the internal control to the ABL and levels of miR-29 to RNA U44. (NCT00492401)
Timeframe: Pre treatment

,
Interventiondelta delta CT values (Median)
Expression levels of MiR-29bExpression levels of DNMT3a
Non Responder0.00243050.000341819
Responders0.00563940.000196066

[back to top]

Rate of Complete Remission

Per International Working Group criteria: Morphologic complete remission (CRm): Defined as morphologic leukemia-free state, including <5% blasts in BM aspirate with marrow spicules and a count of > 200 nucleated cells and no blasts with Auer rods, no persistent extramedullary disease, ANC > 1000/uL, platelet count > 100,000/uL. Patient must be independent of transfusions for a minimum of 1 week before each marrow assessment. Morphologic complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi): Defined as CR with the exception of neutropenia <1000/uL or thrombocytopenia <100,000/ul. Complete Remission Rate (CRm + CRi) (NCT00492401)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

Interventionpatients (Number)
Decitabine25

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (CR) to Protocol Therapy.

"Number of participants achieving Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response to protocol therapy according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.0 Criteria. Per RECIST 1.0 for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; " (NCT00503984)
Timeframe: Up to 4.5 years

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)
Phase 1: Level 1 - 75 Aza + 60 Doc00
Phase 1: Level 3 - 100 Aza + 75 Doc10
Phase 1: Level 4 - 150 Aza + 75 Doc01
Phase 2 - Aza + Doc Initial RPTD01

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Length of time from the date of first observation of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to the date of first observation of disease progression, according to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response according to Prostate Cancer Working Group 1 (PCWG1) criteria. PSA response according to PCWG1 is defined as an least 50 percent decline in PSA level from baseline that was maintained for at least three weeks. (NCT00503984)
Timeframe: Up to 4.5 years.

Interventionweeks (Median)
All Study Participants Achieving PSA Response20.5

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

The time from the date of start of treatment until the first documented or confirmed disease progression, or death related to prostate cancer, whichever is earlier. (NCT00503984)
Timeframe: Up to 4.5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
All Study Participants4.9

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

The time from the date of initiation of study treatment until date of death from any cause. (NCT00503984)
Timeframe: Up to 4.5 years.

Interventionmonths (Median)
All Study Participants19.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events After Beginning Protocol Therapy.

(NCT00503984)
Timeframe: Up to 4.5 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Level 1 - 75 Aza + 60 Doc3
Level 2 - 75 Aza + 75 Doc4
Level 3 - 100 Aza + 75 Doc3
Level 4 - 150 Aza + 75 Doc12

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response.

Number of participants achieving prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response according to Prostate Cancer Working Group 1 (PCWG1) criteria. PSA response according to PCWG1 is defined as an least 50 percent decline in PSA level from baseline that was maintained for at least three weeks. (NCT00503984)
Timeframe: Up to 4.5 years.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Phase 1: Level 1 - 75 Aza + 60 Doc0
Phase 1: Level 2 - 75 Aza + 75 Doc1
Phase 1: Level 3 - 100 Aza + 75 Doc2
Phase 1: Level 4 - 150 Aza + 75 Doc4
Phase 2 - Aza + Doc Initial RPTD3
Phase 2 - Aza + Doc Reduced RPTD0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Complete Remission

Clinical response is determined by achievement of a complete remission (CR) as judged by morphological criteria (< 1% blasts in bone marrow with neutrophil recovery) according to International Working Group (IWG) criteria. (NCT00569010)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Low-Dose Ara-C + AZA-Level 00
Low-Dose Ara-C + AZA-Level 10
High-Dose Ara-C + AZA-Level 00
High-Dose Ara-C + AZA-Level 12

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Objective Clinical Response

Objective Clinical Response includes Participants with Complete Response, Partial Response or Hematologic Improvement and No Response. Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy with cytogenetics every 2 to 4 courses. (NCT00569660)
Timeframe: Every 2 courses of 4 week therapy = each 8 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseHematologic ImprovementNo Response
Azacitidine01726

[back to top]

Apparent Total Clearance of Azacitidine (CL/F)

The apparent total clearance of azacitidine after a single dose on Day 1, calculated as Dose/AUC0-inf. (NCT00652626)
Timeframe: Day 1 at predose, 5, 15, 30, 45 minutes and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose

Interventionliters/hour (Geometric Mean)
Azacitidine 25 mg/m^2104.58
Azacitidine 50 mg/m^2105.76
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2151.55
Azacitidine 100 mg/m^2106.00

[back to top]

Apparent Volume of Distribution of Azacitidine (Vz/F)

The apparent volume of distribution of azacitidine after a single dose on Day 1, calculated according to the equation: Vz/F = Apparent total clearance (CL/F) / terminal phase rate constant (λz) (NCT00652626)
Timeframe: Day 1 at predose, 5, 15, 30, 45 minutes and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose

Interventionliters (Geometric Mean)
Azacitidine 25 mg/m^2208.69
Azacitidine 50 mg/m^296.74
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2259.44
Azacitidine 100 mg/m^2456.69

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Time Point

Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable time point (AUC0-t) of azacitidine following a single dose of azacitidine on Day 1, calculated by the linear trapezoidal rule. (NCT00652626)
Timeframe: Day 1 at predose, 5, 15, 30, 45 minutes and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose

Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Azacitidine 25 mg/m^2454.80
Azacitidine 50 mg/m^2895.38
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2920.76
Azacitidine 100 mg/m^21505.16

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration of Azacitidine (Cmax)

The maximum observed plasma concentration of azacitidine after a single dose on Day 1. (NCT00652626)
Timeframe: Day 1 at predose, 5, 15, 30, 45 minutes and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Azacitidine 25 mg/m^2293.38
Azacitidine 50 mg/m^2749.04
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2745.50
Azacitidine 100 mg/m^21261.96

[back to top]

Terminal Phase Half-life of Azacitidine (t½)

The terminal phase half-life of azacitidine after a single dose on Day 1, calculated according to the following equation: t½ = 0.693/λz, where λz is the terminal phase rate constant. (NCT00652626)
Timeframe: Day 1 at predose, 5, 15, 30, 45 minutes and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose

Interventionhours (Geometric Mean)
Azacitidine 25 mg/m^21.38
Azacitidine 50 mg/m^20.63
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^21.19
Azacitidine 100 mg/m^21.03

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration of Azacitidine (Tmax)

The time to first maximum observed plasma concentration of azacitidine after a single dose on Day 1. (NCT00652626)
Timeframe: Day 1 at predose, 5, 15, 30, 45 minutes and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose

Interventionhours (Median)
Azacitidine 25 mg/m^20.25
Azacitidine 50 mg/m^20.25
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^20.25
Azacitidine 100 mg/m^20.27

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity After Single and Multiple Doses of Azacitidine

"The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-inf) for azacitidine, after a single dose (Day 1) and multiple doses (Day 5), calculated by the linear trapezoidal rule and extrapolated to infinity according to the following equation:~AUC0-inf = AUC0-t + (Ct/ke), where Ct is the last quantifiable concentration and ke = elimination rate constant." (NCT00652626)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 5: predose, 5, 15, 30, 45 minutes and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose

,
Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 5
Normal RF: Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2946.22857.64
Severe RI: Azacitidine 75 mg/m^21573.821210.92

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration of Azacitidine (Cmax) After Single and Multiple Doses of Azacitidine

The maximum observed plasma concentration of azacitidine after a single dose (Day 1) or multiple doses (Day 5) for participants with normal renal function and for participants with severe renal impairment. (NCT00652626)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 5: predose, 5, 15, 30, 45 minutes and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose

,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 5
Normal RF: Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2745.50632.56
Severe RI: Azacitidine 75 mg/m^21056.66668.11

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 8 Hours Post-dose After Single and Multiple Doses of Azacitidine

"The effect of renal impairment on azacitidine pharmacokinetics was analyzed by comparing PK parameters obtained on Days 1 and 5 from participants with severe renal impairment and those with normal renal function.~Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 8 hours post-dose (AUC0-8) of azacitidine following a single dose (Day 1) and multiple doses (Day 5) was calculated by the linear trapezoidal rule." (NCT00652626)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 5: predose, 5, 15, 30, 45 minutes and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose

,
Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 5
Normal RF: Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2921.87843.03
Severe RI: Azacitidine 75 mg/m^21558.321183.61

[back to top]

Apparent Volume of Distribution of Azacitidine (Vz/F) After Single and Multiple Doses of Azacitidine

The apparent volume of distribution of azacitidine after a single dose (Day 1) and multiple doses (Day 5) for participants with normal renal function and severe renal impairment, calculated according to the equation: Vz/F = Apparent total clearance (CL/F) / terminal phase rate constant (λz). (NCT00652626)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 5: predose, 5, 15, 30, 45 minutes and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose

,
Interventionliters (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 5
Normal RF: Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2259.44248.57
Severe RI: Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2120.47184.54

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Last Quantifiable Time Point After Single and Multiple Doses of Azacitidine

The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable time point (AUC0-t) of azacitidine following a single dose (Day 1) and multiple doses (Day 5) was calculated by the linear trapezoidal rule for participants with normal renal function and for participants with severe renal impairment. (NCT00652626)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 5: predose, 5, 15, 30, 45 minutes and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose

,
Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 5
Normal RF: Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2920.76841.62
Severe RI: Azacitidine 75 mg/m^21558.721181.83

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 8 Hours Post-dose

Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 8 hours post-dose (AUC0-8) of azacitidine following a single dose of azacitidine on Day 1, calculated by the linear trapezoidal rule. (NCT00652626)
Timeframe: Day 1 at predose, 5, 15, 30, 45 minutes and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose

Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Azacitidine 25 mg/m^2455.86
Azacitidine 50 mg/m^2897.43
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2921.87
Azacitidine 100 mg/m^21502.86

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity

"The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-inf) for azacitidine after a single dose, calculated by the linear trapezoidal rule and extrapolated to infinity according to the following equation:~AUC0-inf = AUC0-t + (Ct/ke), where Ct is the last quantifiable concentration and ke = elimination rate constant." (NCT00652626)
Timeframe: Day 1 at predose, 5, 15, 30, 45 minutes and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose

Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Azacitidine 25 mg/m^2460.47
Azacitidine 50 mg/m^2897.42
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2945.50
Azacitidine 100 mg/m^21533.37

[back to top]

Terminal Phase Half-life of Azacitidine (t½) After Single and Multiple Doses of Azacitidine

The terminal phase half-life of azacitidine after a single dose (Day 1) or multiple doses (Day 5) for participants with normal renal function and severe renal impairment, calculated according to the following equation: t½ = 0.693/λz, where λz is the terminal phase rate constant. (NCT00652626)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 5: predose, 5, 15, 30, 45 minutes and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose

,
Interventionhours (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 5
Normal RF: Azacitidine 75 mg/m^21.191.03
Severe RI: Azacitidine 75 mg/m^20.971.15

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration of Azacitidine (Tmax) After Single and Multiple Doses of Azacitidine

The time to first maximum observed plasma concentration of azacitidine after a single dose (Day 1) or multiple doses (Day 5) for participants with normal renal function and severe renal impairment. (NCT00652626)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 5: predose, 5, 15, 30, 45 minutes and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose

,
Interventionhours (Median)
Day 1Day 5
Normal RF: Azacitidine 75 mg/m^20.250.38
Severe RI: Azacitidine 75 mg/m^20.500.64

[back to top]

Apparent Total Clearance of Azacitidine (CL/F) After Single and Multiple Doses of Azacitidine

The apparent total clearance of azacitidine after a single dose (Day 1) and multiple doses (Day 5) for participants with normal renal function and severe renal impairment, calculated as Dose/AUC0-inf. (NCT00652626)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 5: predose, 5, 15, 30, 45 minutes and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose

,
Interventionliters/hour (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 5
Normal RF: Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2151.55166.95
Severe RI: Azacitidine 75 mg/m^285.76111.55

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

"A serious adverse event is one that at any dose of the study drug or at any time during the period of observation:~Results in death;~Is life threatening;~Requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization;~Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity;~Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect;~Is medically important.~The Investigator assessed each AE for potential causal relationship between the event and study drug.~The intensity of adverse changes in physical signs or symptoms was graded from 1 to 5 according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 3, and according to the following: Mild (Grade 1), Moderate (Grade 2), Severe (Grade 3), Life threatening (Grade 4), or Death (Grade 5)." (NCT00652626)
Timeframe: Initial treatment phase: Days 1-11 for participants who received a single dose; Days 1-29 for participants who received multiple doses. Extension treatment period: From the date of first dose until 28 days after the date of last dose (up to 7 months).

,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any adverse eventAdverse event related to study drugSerious adverse eventSerious adverse event related to study drugGrade 3 or 4 adverse eventAE leading to study drug discontinuationAE leading to study drug interruptionAE leading to a dose reductionAE leading to other action takenDeath
Azacitidine 100 mg/m^25411100040
Azacitidine 25 mg/m^24200000020
Azacitidine 50 mg/m^23300000010
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^26440400060
Extension Phase: Normal RF1488110441101
Extension Phase: Severe RI4231321031
Severe RI: Azacitidine 75 mg/m^26310300050

[back to top] [back to top]

30-Day Survival

Patients surviving more than 30 days after study registration (NCT00658814)
Timeframe: 30 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Good Risk Patients: Azacitidine Plus Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin92
Poor Risk Patients: Azacitidine Plus Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin87

[back to top]

Complete Response

Morphologic complete remission (CR): ANC >=1,000/mcL, platelet count >=100,000/mcL, <5% bone marrow blasts, no Auer rods, no evidence of extramedullary disease. Morphologic complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi): Same as CR but ANC may be <1,000/mcL and/or platelet count <100,000/mcL. (NCT00658814)
Timeframe: Up to 60 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Good Risk Patients: Azacitidine Plus Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin44
Poor Risk Patients: Azacitidine Plus Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin35

[back to top]

Relapse-free Survival

Relapse-free survival (RFS) is defined for all patients who achieve CR or CRi. RFS is measured from the date CR or CRi is first achieved until relapse or death form any cause, with observation censored on the date of last contact for patients last known to be alive without report of relapse. Relapse from CR/CRi is defined as reappearance of leukemic blasts in the peripheral blood; or > 5% blasts in the bone marrow not attributable to another cause; or appearance or reappearance of extramedullary disease. (NCT00658814)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Good Risk Patients: Azacitidine Plus Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin8
Poor Risk Patients: Azacitidine Plus Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival for all participants at one year after first dose of 5-azacitidine (Vidaza). Overall survival was calculated by the method of Kaplan-Meier with standard errors computed using Greenwood's formula. (NCT00660400)
Timeframe: One year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Combined Therapy62

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

Pre-allogeneic HCT responses to 5-azacitidine (Vidaza), based on the International Working Group criteria: Complete Remission (CR); Partial Response (PR); Stable Disease (SD). Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for the response rate to 5-azacitidine, evaluated at marrow evaluation after 4 cycles of 5-azacitidine or prior to HCT whichever came first. CR: Bone marrow with 5% myeloblasts and normal maturation of all cell lines. PR: All CR criteria if abnormal before treatment except bone marrow blasts decreased by 50% over pretreatment but still > 5%. SD: Failure to attain CR, PR, relapsed (or progressive) disease. (NCT00660400)
Timeframe: At the end of up to six (28 day) cycles of 5-azacitidine

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Partial ResponseComplete RemissionStable DiseaseProgressive Disease
Combined Therapy4803319

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Proceed to Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT)

Proportion of patients enrolled who subsequently proceeded to allogeneic HCT. (NCT00660400)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Combined Therapy84

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Relapse-free Survival (RFS)

Relapse-free survival one year after allogeneic HCT in MDS patients receiving at least one complete cycle of 5-azacitidine (Vidaza) in the pre-transplantation setting. Relapsed disease: if with complete remission (CR) - greater than 5% blasts in bone marrow; if with partial response (PR) - greater than 30% increase in blasts in the marrow; if with stable disease (SD) - return to pretreatment peripheral blood levels and transfusion requirements due to disease. (NCT00660400)
Timeframe: One year post allogeneic HCT

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Combined Therapy52

[back to top]

Change in Platelet Count From Baseline to Peak (the Follow-up Time Point With the Highest Value)

(NCT00661726)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

InterventionX (10^9)/L (Mean)
Decitabine355.0

[back to top]

Change in Erythropoietin Levels From Baseline to Nadir (the Follow-up Time Point With the Lowest Value)

(NCT00661726)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

InterventionmIU/mL (Mean)
Decitabine-43.78

[back to top]

Change in Absolute Reticulocyte Count From Baseline to Nadir (the Follow-up Time Point With the Lowest Value)

(NCT00661726)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

InterventionX (10^9)/L (Mean)
Decitabine-34.00

[back to top]

Change in Absolute Fetal Hemoglobin (HbF) From Baseline to Peak (the Follow-up Time Point With the Highest Value)

(NCT00661726)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Decitabine0.65

[back to top]

Change in Indirect Bilirubin From Baseline to Nadir (the Follow-up Time Point With the Lowest Value)

(NCT00661726)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

Interventionµmol/L (Mean)
Decitabine-17.36

[back to top]

Change in Neutrophil Counts From Baseline to Nadir (the Follow-up Time Point With the Lowest Value)

(NCT00661726)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

InterventionX (10^9)/L (Mean)
Decitabine-3.15

[back to top]

Change in Percentage of Annexin-positive Cells From Baseline to Nadir (the Follow-up Time Point With the Lowest Value)

(NCT00661726)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

Intervention% of Annexin-Positive Cells (Mean)
Decitabine-1.26

[back to top]

Change in Total Hemoglobin (Hb) From Baseline to Peak (the Follow-up Time Point With the Highest Value)

(NCT00661726)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Decitabine1.16

[back to top]

Change in Percentage of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Hb Concentration From Baseline to Peak (the Follow-up Time Point With the Highest Value)

(NCT00661726)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

Intervention% of RBC Hb Concentration (Mean)
Decitabine7.06

[back to top]

Change in Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) From Baseline to Nadir (the Follow-up Time Point With the Lowest Value)

(NCT00661726)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

InterventionU/L (Mean)
Decitabine-116.60

[back to top]

Change in Red Blood Cell (RBC) Deformability From Baseline to Peak (the Follow-up Time Point With the Highest Value)

Deformability was assessed by ektacytometry. Normal RBC have maximal deformability, measurable by osmotic ektacytometry, at isotonicity (290 mosmol). A decrease on the Deformability Index (measured in arbitrary units) corresponds to an impairment in the cell membrane's ability to alter its shape under stress. (NCT00661726)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

InterventionArbitrary Units (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline
Decitabine0.430.09

[back to top]

Number of Evaluable Patients With an Increase From Baseline in Hemoglobin (Hb) of ≥1.5 g/dL

(NCT00661726)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Decitabine2

[back to top]

Two-year Event-free Survival From Time of Treatment Initiation With 5-Azacytidine for All Study Cohorts

Percentage of participants with two year event free survival after their first treatment was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier survival curve. The events analyzed are evidence of molecular, cytogenetic or histologic relapse or death from any cause. Patients alive at the time of last observation will be censored.The estimated two- year event-free survival rate is the same as for overall survival, 37% (SE = 14.3%). (NCT00721214)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A: 5-azacytidine37

[back to top]

One Year Event Free Survival (EFS) for Allogeneic Transplant Recipients After Transplantation

Percentage of participants that received allogeneic transplant and had event free survival, as estimated by the Kaplan-Meier survival curve. The events analyzed are evidence of molecular, cytogenetic or histologic relapse or death from any cause. The estimated one-year event-free survival rate is the same as overall survival, 50%. (NCT00721214)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A: 5-azacytidine50

[back to top]

One-year Event-free Survival From Time of Treatment Initiation With 5-Azacytidine for All Study Cohorts

Percentage of participants with one year event free survival after their first treatment was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier survival curve. The events analyzed are evidence of molecular, cytogenetic or histologic relapse or death from any cause. Patients alive at the time of last observation will be censored.The estimated one-year event-free survival rate is the same as for overall survival, 47% (SE = 13.6%). (NCT00721214)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A: 5-azacytidine47

[back to top]

One-year Overall Survival From Time of Treatment Initiation With 5-Azacytidine for All Study Cohorts

Percentage of participants alive one year after their first treatment was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier survival curve. The events analyzed are evidence of molecular, cytogenetic or histologic relapse or death from any cause. Patients alive at the time of last observation will be censored. The estimated one year overall survival rate from this curve is 47%. The one year overall survival is the same as one year event free survival rate. (NCT00721214)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A: 5-azacytidine47

[back to top]

One Year Overall Survival of Allogeneic Transplant Recipients After Transplantation

Percentage of patients alive one year after their transplantation, as estimated by the Kaplan-Meier survival curve. The estimated one year survival rate from this curve is 50%, while the estimated two year survival rate is 50%. (NCT00721214)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A: 5-azacytidine50

[back to top]

Two Year Overall Survival of Allogeneic Transplant Recipients After Transplantation

Percentage of patients alive two years after their transplantation, as estimated by the Kaplan-Meier survival curve. The estimated two year survival rate is 50%, the same as one year survival rate. (NCT00721214)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A: 5-azacytidine50

[back to top]

Two Year Event Free Survival (EFS) for Allogeneic Transplant Recipients After Transplantation

Percentage of participants that received allogeneic transplant and had event free survival. The percentage of patients was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier survival curve. The events analyzed are evidence of molecular, cytogenetic or histologic relapse or death from any cause. The estimated two-year event-free survival rate is the same as overall survival, 50%. (NCT00721214)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A: 5-azacytidine50

[back to top]

Two-year Overall Survival From Time of Treatment Initiation With 5-Azacytidine for All Study Cohorts.

Percentage of participants alive two years after their first treatment was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier survival curve. The events analyzed are evidence of molecular, cytogenetic or histologic relapse or death from any cause. Patients alive at the time of last observation will be censored.The estimated two year survival rate is 37% .The estimated two-year overall survival rate is the same as two-year event free survival. (NCT00721214)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A: 5-azacytidine37

[back to top]

Phase I: Percentage of Participants Responding to Treatment

Azacitidine is set at 75mg/m2 and Nab-paclitaxel is set at100mg/m2 based on the number of participants responding to treatment as measured per RECIST v1 criteria. (NCT00748553)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercent of participants with response (Number)
Phase 161.5

[back to top]

Phase II: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response Rate (ORR) Measured Using RECIST 1.0 Criteria

"Objective response rate (ORR) will be measured using RECIST 1.0 criteria. The best response, including complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD), for each patient will be summarized.~For target lesions, Complete Response is defined as disappearance of all target lesions for at least 4 weeks; Partial Response consists of at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD, for at least 4 weeks; Progressive Disease consists of at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions; Stable Disease consists of neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started." (NCT00748553)
Timeframe: 1.5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase II53.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With ER+ Status

Tissue SPARC protein will be assessed using archival tumor blocks. In addition, in patients who have easily accessible tumors, such as lymph nodes, cutaneous or subcutaneous lesions, and who have consented to sample collection, biopsies will be taken twice: before cycle 1 day 1 treatment, and cycle 3 day 8 (+/- 3 days). (NCT00748553)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionparticipants were ER+ (Number)
Phase II11

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Response to the Combination Treatment of Mylotarg With 5-azacitidine

(NCT00766116)
Timeframe: Hematologic and Cytogeneic Response to treatment will be assessed when evaluated at the time the ANC has reached 1000/mm3 for three consecutive days, assessed up to 4 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment36

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities

MTD was the maximum number of 5-azacitadine doses (75mg/m2) at which fewer than 1/3 of patients experienced a DLT during cycle 1 of therapy based on CTCAE Version 3.0. In the phase I portion, we assessed 3 dose levels of azacitidine starting on day 1, with 6, 4, and 4 patients in cohort 1, 2, and 3, respectively. We identified no dose-limiting toxicities and identified the phase 2 dose as 75 mg/m2 of 5-azacitadine for 6 days. (NCT00766116)
Timeframe: up to 28 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 1 Cohort 10
Phase 1 Cohort 20
Phase 1 Cohort 30

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Molecular Response

Molecular Remission defined as two consecutive bone marrow samples done one month apart with negative PCR( polymerase chain reaction) tor CML. (NCT00813124)
Timeframe: 12 month post BMT

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseProgressive Disease
Azacytidine Maintenance After Allotx804

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

(NCT00887068)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionyears (Median)
AZA Group2.5
Standard of Care Group2.6

[back to top]

Relapse-free Survival (RFS)

The time that a participant survives without relapse of the disease. (NCT00887068)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionyears (Median)
AZA Group2.1
Standard of Care Group1.3

[back to top]

Remission Duration

Responses and remission were assessed according to the ELN guidelines. (NCT00890929)
Timeframe: 26 months

Interventionweeks (Median)
Azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide6

[back to top]

Time to PR

Responses were assessed according to the ELN guidelines. (NCT00890929)
Timeframe: 36 weeks

Interventionweeks (Median)
Azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide6

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS from the start of treatment was assessed at a median follow up of 88 weeks from the end of treatment (range, 1-120), and was censored at 1 April 2012. (NCT00890929)
Timeframe: 88 weeks (median)

Interventionweeks (Median)
Azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide20

[back to top]

4-week Survival Rate

"Early death was assessed as death within 28 days of the start of treatment" (NCT00890929)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionpercentage of subjects remaining alive (Number)
Azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide83

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR includes subjects with CR, CRi, and partial response (PR). Responses were assessed according to the ELN guidelines. (NCT00890929)
Timeframe: 26 months

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide41

[back to top]

OS of Responders

OS from the start of treatment of responders (per ELN guidelines) was assessed at a median follow up of 88 weeks from the end of treatment (range, 1-120), and was censored at 1 April 2012. (NCT00890929)
Timeframe: 88 weeks (median)

Interventionweeks (Median)
Azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide69

[back to top]

Time to CR

CR includes subjects with CR but incomplete recovery of blood counts (CRi). Responses were assessed according to the ELN guidelines. (NCT00890929)
Timeframe: 18 weeks

Interventionweeks (Median)
Azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide12

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Lenalidomide

The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of lenalidomide was determined in study phase 1, for use in study Phase 2 (not conducted). The outcome is reported as the dose of lenalidomide that represents the MTD. (NCT00890929)
Timeframe: 15 months

Interventionmg/day lenalidomide (oral) (Number)
Azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide50

[back to top]

Compete Remission (CR) Rate

Compete Remission (CR) includes subjects with CR but incomplete recovery of blood counts (CRi). CR was assessed according to the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines, and is defined as the absence of clonal lymphocytes in the peripheral blood. (NCT00890929)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide28

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Complete Remission

Efficacy Defined as Best Response Achieved During Study Treatment Measured by Complete Remission (CR) Rate (NCT00895934)
Timeframe: up to 3 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 2/Selected Dose18

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicity (Phase I)

(NCT00895934)
Timeframe: 42 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Dose 10
Dose 20
Dose 30
Dose 41

[back to top]

Disease Relapse

(NCT00895934)
Timeframe: up to 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 2/Selected Dose5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicity After the Vorinostat Dose

(NCT00895934)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Phase 1 Dose-Finding Cohorts 1-34
Phase 2/Selected Dose18

[back to top]

Time to Progression

The time to progression was measured using time from the first day of treatment to the first day of an evaluation of progressive disease or the date of death for any cause. (NCT00934440)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionmonths (Mean)
Dose Escalation: 5-azacitidine5.6

[back to top]

Toxicities by Dose Level

Toxicities determined using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 (NCT00934440)
Timeframe: 3 to 6 months

Interventionadverse events (Number)
AEs at dose level 1AEs at dose level 2AEs at dose level 3
5-Azacitidine Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)444849

[back to top]

Clinical Response Other Than Composite Clinical Response for Myeloid Dysplastic Syndromes(MDS)/Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) Patients Per Investigator (Phase Llb)

This is the best overall response as measured by Clinical response. Clinical response is defined as having complete remission (CR), bone marrow complete remission (BM-CR), partial remission or hematologic improvement (HI) as defined by the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria. (NCT00946647)
Timeframe: 48 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Panobinostat + 5-Azacytidine41.9
5-Azacytidine41.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) (Phase lb)

Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as a toxicity requiring treatment withdrawal and included the following: Non-hematologic toxicity qualifying for DLT and Hematologic toxicity qualifying for DLT (NCT00946647)
Timeframe: within the first 28 days (cycle 1)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
PAN + 5-Aza 20 mg1
PAN + 5-Aza 30 mg3
PAN + 5-Aza 40 mg2

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP) (Phase Llb)

"Time to progression (TTP) was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented PD per investigator's assessment or death due to study indication.~Time to progression was analyzed by the Kaplan Meier method. Based on the Guidelines for Implementation of international working group (IWG) response criteria in AML, MDS and CMML according to Cheson 2003 and 2006." (NCT00946647)
Timeframe: 48 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Panobinostat + 5-AzacytidineNA
5-Azacytidine15.2

[back to top]

Clinical Response Other Than Composite Clinical Response for Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) Patients Per Investigator (Phase Llb)

This is the best overall response as measured by Clinical response. Clinical response is defined as having complete remission (CR), complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) or partial remission as defined by the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria. (NCT00946647)
Timeframe: 48 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Panobinostat + 5-Azacytidine22.2
5-Azacytidine30.8

[back to top]

Hematologic Improvement (HI) for Myeloid Dysplastic Syndromes(MDS)/Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) Patients Per Investigator (Phase Llb)

"Hematologic response consists of Erythroid response (HI-E), Platelet response (HI-P) and Neutrophil response (HI-N).~HI-E: Hgb increase by ≥ 1.5 g/dL over pretreatment & relevant reduction of units of RBC transfusions by an absolute number of at least 4 units of PRBCs/8 weeks compared with the pretreatment transfusion number in the previous 8 weeks. Only RBC transfusions given for a Hgb of ≤ 9.0 g/dL pretreatment will count in the RBC transfusion response evaluation.~HI-P: Absolute increase of ≥ 30 x 109/L over pretreatment or patients starting with ≥ 20 x 109/L platelets OR increase from <20 x 109/L at pretreatment to > 20 x 109/L and by at least 100%.~HI-N: At least 100% increase and an absolute increase > 0.5 x 109/L over pretreatment value." (NCT00946647)
Timeframe: 48 months

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Erythroid response (HI-E)Platelet response (HI-P)Neutrophil response (HI-N)
5-Azacytidine31.024.113.8
Panobinostat + 5-Azacytidine25.835.519.4

[back to top]

1-year Survival Rate (Phase Llb)

Overall survival was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. If a patient was not known to have died, survival was censored at the date of last contact. Patients not known to have died were censored for 'Lost to follow-up' if the time between their last contact date and the analysis cut-off date was longer than 3 months and 2 weeks (104 days) during the first year after study evaluation completion, and longer than 6 months and 2 weeks (194 days), thereafter. The 1-year survival rate was obtained from the Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival, and its variance was estimated by Greenwood's formula. (NCT00946647)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Panobinostat + 5-Azacytidine14.9
5-Azacytidine15.6

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) Assessed by Best Overall Response: Participants With AML Per Investigator (Phase Llb)

"Best overall response as measured by complete remission (CR) or complete response with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) or partial remission (PR).~Overall response patients achieved other than the composite CR by individual response category: CR, CRi or PR." (NCT00946647)
Timeframe: 48 months

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Clinical response (CR, CRi, PR)Complete remission (CR)Compl remiss. with incompl blood cnt recovery(CRi)Partial remission (PR)
5-Azacytidine30.815.47.77.7
Panobinostat + 5-Azacytidine22.211.111.10.0

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) Assessed by Best Overall Response: Participants With MDS/CMML Per Investigator (Phase Llb)

"Best overall response as measured by complete remission (CR) or bone marrow CR (BM-CR) or partial remission (PR) or hematologic improvement (HI).~Overall response patients achieved other than the composite CR by individual response category: CR, CRi, mCR or PR as defined by the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria." (NCT00946647)
Timeframe: 48 months

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Clinical response (CR, BM-CR, PR, HI)Complete remission (CR)Bone marrow CR (BM-CR)Partial remission (PR)
5-Azacytidine41.46.93.46.9
Panobinostat + 5-Azacytidine41.916.112.90.0

[back to top]

Number of Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) (Phase lb)

Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as a toxicity requiring treatment withdrawal and included the following: Non-hematologic toxicity qualifying for DLT and Hematologic toxicity qualifying for DLT (NCT00946647)
Timeframe: within the first 28 days (cycle 1)

InterventionDLTs (Number)
PAN + 5-Aza 20 mg2
PAN + 5-Aza 30 mg6
PAN + 5-Aza 40 mg4

[back to top]

Composite Complete Response (Phase Llb)

Composite complete response is defined as complete response (CR), Complete response with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) or bone marrow complete response (BM-CR) as defined by the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria. (NCT00946647)
Timeframe: 48 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Panobinostat + 5-Azacytidine27.5
5-Azacytidine14.3

[back to top]

Response Rate

Number of participants with Complete Response (CR) in AML requiring disappearance of all signs and symptoms related to disease, normalization of peripheral counts (absolute neutrophil count 10^9/L or more, platelet count 100 x 10^9/L or more), and a marrow with 5% or less marrow blasts; a hematologic improvement (HI) defined as a CR except for a platelet count increase by 50% to above 30 x 10^9/L. For MDS, the International Working Group criteria used to assess response. (NCT00948064)
Timeframe: 12-18 Months

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete ResponseHematologic ImprovementNo ResponseNot Evaluable
Azacitidine, Phase II81171
Vorinostat With Azacitidine, Phase I90210
Vorinostat With Azacitidine, Phase II111391

[back to top]

Survival at Day 60

Assessment of survival for outcome done on 60 days following therapy and includes participants alive for at least 60 days. Survival is calculated from start of therapy until death from any cause. (NCT00948064)
Timeframe: Phase II, Baseline to 60 days following first treatment.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Vorinostat With Azacitidine, Phase II43
Azacitidine, Phase II18

[back to top]

Survival at Day 60

Assessment of survival for outcome done on 60 days following therapy and includes participants alive for at least 60 days. Survival is calculated from start of therapy until death from any cause. (NCT00948064)
Timeframe: Phase I, Baseline to 60 days following first treatment.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Vorinostat With Azacitidine, Phase I24

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate

Response to therapy was determined based on percentage of blasts in bone marrow, hematopoiesis, and requirement for supportive care (i.e., transfusions or cytokine growth factors). The modified International Working Group response criteria was used, based on Cheson, et al. (NCT00997243)
Timeframe: up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
5-azacytidine and Lintuzumab14

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

Response to therapy was determined based on percentage of blasts in bone marrow, hematopoiesis, and requirement for supportive care (i.e., transfusions or cytokine growth factors). The modified International Working Group response criteria was used, based on Cheson, et al. (NCT00997243)
Timeframe: up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
5-azacytidine and Lintuzumab14

[back to top]

Toxicities of the Combination

All patients who received study drug were closely monitored for adverse events (AEs). All AEs that occured during study period were reported and the investigator determined the severity and relationship to study drug (unrelated, unlikely, possibly, probably, or definitely related). The NCI's CTCAE(Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects)v3.0 was used for grading AEs. (NCT00997243)
Timeframe: up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Thrombosis/embolism (vascular access-related)PlateletsNeutrophils/granulocytes (ANC/AGC)LymphopeniaLeukocytes (total WBC)Infection with unknown ANC - Upper airway NOSInfection with normal ANC or Grade 1 or 2 neutrophInfection with unknown ANC - Bladder (urinary)InfectionInfection Grade 3 or 4 neutrophils-bloodHemorrhage, GI (lower GI NOS/Rectum)Hemorrhage/Bleeding - OtherHemoglobinFever (in the absence of neutropenia)Febrile neutropenia (fever of unknown origin)
5-azacytidine and Lintuzumab1410010057100141414282814141002814

[back to top]

Complete Response

Complete Response (NCT01004991)
Timeframe: 13 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
All Patients11

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR), Defined as Proportion of Patients Having Complete Response (CR) and Marrow Complete Response (mCR) After Completion of 3 Cycles of Study Drug.

"Based on Modified International Working Group Response Criteria for Altering Natural History of Myelodysplastic Syndromes.~Complete Response: Bone marrow: ≤ 5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines. Persistent dysplasia will be noted. Peripheral blood Hgb ≥ 11 g/dL; Platelets ≥ 100 X 10^9/L; Neutrophils ≥ 1.0 X 10^9/Lb; Blasts 0%.~Marrow Complete Response: Bone marrow: ≤ 5% myeloblasts and decrease by ≥ 50% over pretreatment. Peripheral blood: if hematological improvement responses, they will be noted in addition to marrow CR." (NCT01011283)
Timeframe: 13 Weeks

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Overall Response RateComplete ResponseMarrow Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable Disease
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2000025.0
Decitabine 20 mg/m^2000045.5

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR), Defined as Proportion of Patients Having Complete Response (CR) and Marrow Complete Response (mCR) After Completion of 6 Cycles of Study Drug.

"Based on Modified International Working Group Response Criteria for Altering Natural History of Myelodysplastic Syndromes.~Complete Response: Bone marrow: ≤ 5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines. Persistent dysplasia will be noted. Peripheral blood Hgb ≥ 11 g/dL; Platelets ≥ 100 X 10^9/L; Neutrophils ≥ 1.0 X 10^9/Lb; Blasts 0%.~Marrow Complete Response: Bone marrow: ≤ 5% myeloblasts and decrease by ≥ 50% over pretreatment. Peripheral blood: if hematological improvement responses, they will be noted in addition to marrow CR." (NCT01011283)
Timeframe: 36 Weeks

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Overall Response RateComplete ResponseMarrow Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable Disease
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^28.38.30016.7
Decitabine 20 mg/m^29.19.109.136.4

[back to top]

Partial Remission Rate (PR)

Requires that the criteria for complete remission be met with the following exceptions: decrease of >50% in the percentage of blasts to 5-25% in the BM aspirate. A value of < 5% blasts in BM with Auer rods is also considered a partial remission. (NCT01016600)
Timeframe: Completion of treatment (median follow-up was 8 weeks) (range 4-68 weeks)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Cohort 12
Cohort 20
Cohort 32
Phase II5

[back to top]

Toxicity Profile (Grade 3/4 Toxicities)

AML ≥18 years or untreated AML ≥60 years (NCT01016600)
Timeframe: 30 days after completion of treatment (median follow-up was 12 weeks (range 8-72 weeks))

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
AnemiaFebrile neutropeniaOtitis mastoditis - worseningDiarrheaNauseaVomitingDental carriesFatigueSepsisBronchial infectionBacteremiaLung infectionSkin infectionActivated partial thromboplastin time prolongedBlood bilirubin increasedCreatinine increasedNeutrophil count decreasedPlatelet count decreasedWhite blood cell count decreasedLymphocyte count decreasedDehydrationHypernatremiaHypocalcemiaHypophosphatemiaBack painGeneralized muscle weaknessPain in extremityLeukemia vasculitis left calfAcute kidney injuryDyspneaEpistaxisProductive coughPulmonary edemaRash maculo-papularSkin ulcerationHypotensionConstipationEdema limbsCatheter related infectionAlanine aminotransferase increasedINR increasedHyperglycemiaHematuriaCoughWheezingCardiac arrestPerianal hemorrhageCyst infectionIncarcerated herniaHypoalbuminemiaHypokalemiaRespiratory failurePruritusHypertensionAtrial fibrillationChest pain cardiacLeft ventricular systolic dysfunctionSupraventricular tachycardiaDysphagiaEsophagitisLower gastrointestinal hemorrhagePainOtitis mediaScrotal infectionUpper respiratory infectionUrinary tract infectionWound infectionFallFractureWeight lossAnorexiaHyponatremiaNeck painPolyarthropathySyncopePleuritic pain
Cohort 13411121111231121747521141211131111130000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Cohort 20100000000002000021100000000020000001111111110000000000000000000000000000000
Cohort 30302000420122021234100130100110101010010000001111121110000000000000000000000
Phase II48001204100920302610230060210020001010111051000000131001111111111111111131122

[back to top]

Duration of CR for Complete Responders

(NCT01016600)
Timeframe: Completion of treatment (median follow-up was 8 weeks) (range 4-68 weeks)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cohort 110.9
Cohort 21.4
Cohort 34.95
Phase II12.15

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Defined as the date of first dose of study drug to the date of death from any cause. (NCT01016600)
Timeframe: Until death - median follow-up 4.6 months (full range (0.3-31.4 months))

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cohort 14.2
Cohort 24.5
Cohort 38.9
Phase II4.3

[back to top]

Morphologic Leukemia-free State

Defined as < 5% blasts on the BM aspirate with spicules and a count of >200 nucleated cells and no blasts with Auer rods, and no persistent extramedullary disease. (NCT01016600)
Timeframe: Median number of cycles completed [3 cycles (12 weeks) full range (1 (4 weeks)-17 (68 weeks))]

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Cohort 12
Cohort 21
Cohort 32
Phase II2

[back to top]

Morphologic Complete Remission Rate (CRm)

Defined as morphologic leukemia-free state, including <5% blasts in BM aspirate with marrow spicules and a count of > 200 nucleated cells and no blasts with Auer rods, no persistent extramedullary disease, ANC > 1000/uL, platelet count > 100,000/uL. Patient must be independent of transfusions for a minimum of 1 week before each marrow assessment. There is no duration requirement for this designation. (NCT01016600)
Timeframe: Completion of treatment (median follow-up was 8 weeks) (range 4-68 weeks)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Cohort 11
Cohort 20
Cohort 31
Phase II1

[back to top]

Event Free Survival

Defined as the interval from the date of first dose of study drug to date of treatment failure, recurrence, or death due to any cause. (NCT01016600)
Timeframe: Until death - median follow-up 4.6 months (full range (0.3-31.4 months))

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cohort 13.8
Cohort 23.4
Cohort 37.8
Phase II2.9

[back to top]

Cytogenetic CR (CRc) Rate

Only patients with an identified cytogenetic abnormality may receive this designation. Defines as a morphologic complete remission plus reversion to a normal karyotype (no clonal abnormalities detected in a minimum of 20 mitotic cells). (NCT01016600)
Timeframe: Completion of treatment (median follow-up was 8 weeks) (range 4-68 weeks)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Cohort 11
Cohort 20
Cohort 30
Phase II0

[back to top]

CR With Incomplete Blood Counts Rate

Defined as CR with the exception of neutropenia <1000/uL or thrombocytopenia <100,000/ul. (NCT01016600)
Timeframe: Completion of treatment (median follow-up was 8 weeks) (range 4-68 weeks)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Cohort 11
Cohort 21
Cohort 31
Phase II1

[back to top]

Response Rate (CRm + CRc + CRi + PR)

"Response rate (CRm + CRc + CRi + PR)~CRm = morphologic complete remission~CRc = cytogenetic complete remission~CRi = morphologic complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery~PR = partial remission" (NCT01016600)
Timeframe: Median number of cycles completed [3 cycles (12 weeks) full range (1 (4 weeks)-17 (68 weeks))]

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
CRmCRcCRiPR
Cohort 11112
Cohort 20010
Cohort 31012
Phase II1015

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

Defined as the interval from the date of the first dose of study drug to the date of progressive disease. (NCT01016600)
Timeframe: Until progressive disease - median follow-up 4.6 months (full range (0.3-31.4 months))

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cohort 15.7
Cohort 23.4
Cohort 37.8
Phase II3.7

[back to top]

Relapse Free Survival (RFS)

This is determined only for patients achieving a complete remission. Defined as the interval from the date of first documentation of a leukemia free state to date of recurrence or death due to any cause. (NCT01016600)
Timeframe: Until death - median follow-up 4.6 months (full range (0.3-31.4 months))

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cohort 112.0
Cohort 21.4
Cohort 34.9
Phase II12.2

[back to top]

Phase II Only - Complete Remission Rate (CRm + CRi) in Participants With Untreated AML ≥60 Years of Age

"Morphologic complete remission (CRm): Defined as morphologic leukemia-free state, including <5% blasts in BM aspirate with marrow spicules and a count of > 200 nucleated cells and no blasts with Auer rods, no persistent extramedullary disease, ANC > 1000/uL, platelet count > 100,000/uL. Patient must be independent of transfusions for a minimum of 1 week before each marrow assessment.~Morphologic complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi): Defined as CR with the exception of neutropenia <1000/uL or thrombocytopenia <100,000/ul." (NCT01016600)
Timeframe: Completion of treatment (median follow-up was 8 weeks) (range 4-68 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase II22

[back to top]

Phase I Only - Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) as Measured by Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

"The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is defined as the dose level immediately below the dose level at which 2 patients of a cohort (of 2 to 6 patients) experience dose-limiting toxicity during the first cycle.~Hematologic DLT is as a persistent bone marrow aplasia with ≤ 10 % cellularity, which persists for > 60 days from the start of a chemotherapy cycle.~Non-hematologic DLT is defined as any Grade 3 or Grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity that occurs during the first cycle with the specific exceptions of nausea, vomiting, anorexia, weight loss, infections or electrolyte abnormalities attributable to any other cause. Grade 3 triglycerides will be considered a DLT only for patients who have Grade 3 in spite of appropriate lipid lowering drug therapy." (NCT01016600)
Timeframe: Completion of the phase I portion of study (approximately 1 year and 4 months)

Interventiondose-limiting toxicities (Number)
Cohort 11
Cohort 20
Cohort 30

[back to top]

Phase I Only - Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)

"The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is defined as the dose level immediately below the dose level at which 2 patients of a cohort (of 2 to 6 patients) experience dose-limiting toxicity during the first cycle.~Hematologic DLT is as a persistent bone marrow aplasia with ≤ 10 % cellularity, which persists for > 60 days from the start of a chemotherapy cycle.~Non-hematologic DLT is defined as any Grade 3 or Grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity that occurs during the first cycle with the specific exceptions of nausea, vomiting, anorexia, weight loss, infections or electrolyte abnormalities attributable to any other cause. Grade 3 triglycerides will be considered a DLT only for patients who have Grade 3 in spite of appropriate lipid lowering drug therapy." (NCT01016600)
Timeframe: Completion of the phase I portion of study (approximately 1 year and 4 months)

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
Phase I Cohort75

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) of Lenalidomide in Combination With 5-azacytidine (5-AZA) in Participants With Leukemia

Response defined as complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery (CRi) for AML or any response for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) using international working group (IWG)-06 criteria. Complete response (CR) requires normalization of peripheral counts (absolute neutrophil count 10^9/L or more, platelet count 100 x 10^9/L or more), and a bone marrow with 5% or less marrow blasts. A hematologic improvement (HI) is defined as a CR with a platelet count above 30 x 10^9/L, without the need for transfusion of Platelets. (NCT01038635)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase I: 5-AZA + LEN MTD14
Phase II: 5-AZA + LEN45

[back to top]

Number of Dose Limiting Toxicities for Determining Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Lenalidomide in Combination With 5-azacytidine (5-AZA)

DLT determined only during first course of therapy, at least 28 days from treatment of last participant before a new dose level initiated. All severe (Grade 3-4) non-hematological toxicities that are drug related considered for DLT determination. If 1 participant develops grade III-IV non-hematological toxicity, 3 more will be accrued at that particular dose level. If 2 or more participants develop grade III-IV non-hematologic toxicity, the doses of the combination at which this occurs will be considered too toxic. A total of 10 patients will be treated at the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination (the dose level below that considered to be too toxic) to confirm its tolerability. (NCT01038635)
Timeframe: 3-8 week cycles, up to 24 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
5-AZA + 5 Days LEN 10 mg0
5-AZA + 5 Days LEN 15 mg0
5-AZA + 5 Days LEN 20 mg0
5-AZA + 5 Days LEN 25 mg0
5-AZA + 5 Days LEN 50 mg0
5-AZA + 5 Days LEN 75 mg0
5-AZA + 10 Days LEN 75 mg 75 mg0

[back to top]

Overall Response: Number of Participants With CR or CRi Response

Response defined as complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery (CRi) for AML or any response for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) using international working group (IWG)-06 criteria. Complete response (CR) requires normalization of peripheral counts (absolute neutrophil count 10^9/L or more, platelet count 100 x 10^9/L or more), and a bone marrow with 5% or less marrow blasts. A hematologic improvement (HI) is defined as a CR with a platelet count above 30 x 10^9/L, without the need for transfusion of Platelets. (NCT01038635)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete Remission (CR)Incomplete Count Recover (CRi)
Overall Study: 5-AZA + LEN MTD1516

[back to top]

Toxicity as Assessed by NCI CTCAE v3.0

Time frame includes after stem cell transplant engraftment. Toxicity post ALI infusion: 1 patient grade 1 hypertension 90 min post infusion. Toxicity post Rev maintenance: 1 patient not tolerated, 1 patient dose decreased due to counts. (NCT01050790)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Toxicity post ALI infusionToxicity post Rev maintenance
5-azacytidine + Lenalidomide -> Auto Stem Cell Transplant12

[back to top]

Progression-free and Overall Survival

"Survival and event-free survival curves (any event of fatality, relapse, acute or chronic GVHD) with Kaplan-Meier curves. The incidence curve for relapse - accounting for the competing risk of fatality - is plotted with step-wise curves. The R statistical software (version 2.15) was used for all time-to-event analyses, with the survival package used for survival curves, and the cmprsk package used for all competing risk curves.~Results: The one-year survival rate is 93.3% (SE = 0.4%), and the two-year survival rate is 86.1% (SE = 0.9%)." (NCT01050790)
Timeframe: 1 year to 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
one- year survival ratetwo-year survival rateone-year relapse ratetwo-year relapse rateone-year event free survival ratetwo-year event free survival rate
5-azacytidine + Lenalidomide -> Auto Stem Cell Transplant93.386.112.519.287.567.3

[back to top]

Feasibility to Mobilize and Infuse Autologous Lymphocytes (ALI) After Immunomodulatory Therapy and After Stem Cell Transplant Engraftment

Time frame is post 2nd and 3rd cycles of rev/aza and after stem cell transplant engraftment. (NCT01050790)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
mobilize lymphocyteslymphocytes infused post transplantnot able to mobilize stem cells/no transplant
5-azacytidine + Lenalidomide -> Auto Stem Cell Transplant17161

[back to top]

Time to Progression Post Transplant

Time to progression post transplant: For patients not in Complete Response (CR), progressive disease requires one or more: >25% increase in the level of the serum monoclonal paraprotein(absolute increase of at least 0.5 g/dL); > 25% increase in 24-hour urinary light chain excretion(absolute increase of at least 200m/24 hours). Increase plasma cells in a bone marrow aspirate( absolute increase of at least 10%). Definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas. Development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas. Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum Ca > 11.5 mg/dL or > 2.65 mmol/L) not attributable to any other cause. All relapse categories require two consecutive assessments made any time before classification as relapse or progressive disease. (NCT01050790)
Timeframe: 28 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
5-azacytidine + Lenalidomide -> Auto Stem Cell Transplant14.9

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate at 6 Months

16 of 17 patients proceeded to transplant. 6 month CR rate post transplant was 8/16 (50%). (NCT01050790)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
5-azacytidine + Lenalidomide -> Auto Stem Cell Transplant50

[back to top]

CTA Expression Before and After Azacitidine Therapy

Six patients tested have demonstrated CTA up-regulation in either unfractionated bone marrow (n = 4) or CD138+ cells (n = 2). CTA (CTAG1B)-specific T cell response has been observed in all three patients tested and persists following SCT. (NCT01050790)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
CTA up-regulationCD138+ cellsunfractionated bone marrowCTA (CTAG1B)-specific T cell response
5-azacytidine + Lenalidomide -> Auto Stem Cell Transplant6243

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU): Number of Inpatient Hospitalizations

HRU was defined as any consumption of healthcare resources directly or indirectly related to the treatment of the patient. HRU Analysis may help in evaluating potential costs and budget impact of new treatments from a payer perspective. (NCT01074047)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) to 40 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Azacitidine (AZA)139
Conventional Care Regimens (CCR)111

[back to top]

Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU): Rate of Inpatient Hospitalizations Per Year

HRU was defined as any consumption of healthcare resources directly or indirectly related to the treatment of the patient. HRU Analysis may help in evaluating potential costs and budget impact of new treatments from a payer perspective. The rate of inpatient hospitalizations per patient year was calculated as the total number of hospitalizations divided by the total number of patient-years followed in the study period. Patient-years (PY) were calculated as the duration from baseline to last available HRQL assessment for each patient. (NCT01074047)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) to 40 months

Interventionhospitalizations per patient year (Number)
Azacitidine (AZA)7.95
Conventional Care Regimens (CCR)4.82

[back to top]

HRQoL: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnea

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnea scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a higher level of symptoms. Negative change from Baseline values indicate decreased dyspnea (i.e. improvement in symptom) and positive values indicate increased dyspnea (i.e. worsening of symptom). (NCT01074047)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 3, at approximately 3 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Azacitidine (AZA)5.1
Conventional Care Regimen-1.7

[back to top]

HRQoL: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnea

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnea scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a higher level of symptoms. Negative change from Baseline values indicate decreased dyspnea (i.e. improvement in symptom) and positive values indicate increased dyspnea (i.e. worsening of symptom). (NCT01074047)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 5, at approximately 5 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Azacitidine (AZA)3.9
Conventional Care Regimen-6.6

[back to top]

HRQoL: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnea

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnea scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a higher level of symptoms. Negative change from Baseline values indicate decreased dyspnea (i.e. improvement in symptom) and positive values indicate increased dyspnea (i.e. worsening of symptom). (NCT01074047)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 7, at approximately 7 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Azacitidine (AZA)0.4
Conventional Care Regimen-8.8

[back to top]

HRQoL: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnea

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnea scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a higher level of symptoms. Negative change from Baseline values indicate decreased dyspnea (i.e. improvement in symptom) and positive values indicate increased dyspnea (i.e. worsening of symptom). (NCT01074047)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of study, at approximately 11-12 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Azacitidine (AZA)12.6
Conventional Care Regimen6.3

[back to top]

HRQoL: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status-/Quality of Life Domain

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better Global Health Status/QOL. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in Global Health Status/QOL and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT01074047)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 3, at approximately 3 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Azacitidine (AZA)0.9
Conventional Care Regimen3.8

[back to top]

HRQoL: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status-/Quality of Life Domain

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better Global Health Status/QOL. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in Global Health Status/QOL and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT01074047)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 5, at approximately 5 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Azacitidine (AZA)1.6
Conventional Care Regimen9.0

[back to top]

HRQoL: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status-/Quality of Life Domain

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better Global Health Status/QOL. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in Global Health Status/QOL and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT01074047)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 7, at approximately 7 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Azacitidine (AZA)5.1
Conventional Care Regimen8.7

[back to top]

HRQoL: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Domain

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 PhysicalFunctioning Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT01074047)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 9, at approximately 9 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Azacitidine (AZA)3.5
Conventional Care Regimen-0.4

[back to top]

HRQoL: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Domain

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 PhysicalFunctioning Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT01074047)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of study, at approximately 11-12 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Azacitidine (AZA)-13.0
Conventional Care Regimen-9.4

[back to top]

HRQoL: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnea

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnea scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a higher level of symptoms. Negative change from Baseline values indicate decreased dyspnea (i.e. improvement in symptom) and positive values indicate increased dyspnea (i.e. worsening of symptom). (NCT01074047)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 9, at approximately 9 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Azacitidine (AZA)-4.9
Conventional Care Regimen-2.8

[back to top]

HRU: Number of Participants Receiving Transfusions

Count of study participants who had transfusions during the treatment phase. HRU is defined as any consumption of healthcare resources directly or indirectly related to the treatment of the patient. HRU Analysis may help in evaluating potential costs and budget impact of new treatments from a payer perspective. (NCT01074047)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) to 40 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Azacitidine (AZA)154
Conventional Care Regimen134

[back to top]

HRU: Rate of Transfusions Per Patient Year

HRU is defined as any consumption of healthcare resources directly or indirectly related to the treatment of the patient. HRU Analysis may help in evaluating potential costs and budget impact of new treatments from a payer perspective. The rate of transfusions per patient year was calculated as the total number of transfusions divided by the total number of patient-years followed in the study period. Patient-years (PY) were calculated as the duration from baseline to last available HRQL assessment for each patient. (NCT01074047)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) to 40 months

Interventiontransfusions per patient year (Number)
Azacitidine (AZA)34.23
Conventional Care Regimen36.04

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Overall Survival

Overall Survival was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. Overall survival was calculated by the formula: date of death - date of randomization + 1. Participants surviving at the end of the follow-up period or who withdrew consent to follow-up were censored at the date of last contact. Participants who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date last known alive. (NCT01074047)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) to 40 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine (AZA)10.4
Conventional Care Regimens (CCR)6.5

[back to top]

HRQoL: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status-/Quality of Life Domain

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better Global Health Status/QOL. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in Global Health Status/QOL and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT01074047)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 9, at approximately 9 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Azacitidine (AZA)7.8
Conventional Care Regimen10.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Achieved a Cytogenetic Complete Response (CRc-10) as Determined by the IRC.

The CRc is a normal karyotype defined as no clonal abnormalities after review of at least 10 metaphases using conventional cytogenetic techniques. Cytogenetic complete remission rate (CRc) is when the following criteria are met: 1) CR criteria met and 2) an abnormal karyotype is present at baseline and 3) there is reversion to normal karyotype at the time of CR (based on ≥ 10 metaphases), where date of cytogenetic sample = date of BM sample used for the CR assessment (NCT01074047)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) to 40 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Azacitidine (AZA)5
Conventional Care Regimens (CCR)15

[back to top]

HRQoL: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Domain

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 PhysicalFunctioning Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT01074047)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 7, at approximately 7 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Azacitidine (AZA)1.6
Conventional Care Regimen1.5

[back to top]

HRQoL: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Domain

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 PhysicalFunctioning Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT01074047)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 5, at approximately 5 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Azacitidine (AZA)-4.4
Conventional Care Regimen-1.3

[back to top]

HRQoL: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Domain

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 PhysicalFunctioning Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better functioning. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT01074047)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 3, at approximately 3 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Azacitidine (AZA)-4.2
Conventional Care Regimen-0.3

[back to top]

HRQoL: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status-/Quality of Life Domain

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better Global Health Status/QOL. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in Global Health Status/QOL and positive values indicate improvement. (NCT01074047)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of study, at approximately 11-12 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Azacitidine (AZA)-4.4
Conventional Care Regimen-6.1

[back to top]

Duration of Remission Assessed by the IRC Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates

The time from the date CR or CRi was first documented until the date of documented relapse from CR/CRi. Duration of remission was defined only for those participants who achieved a CR or CRi, as determined by the IRC. Participants who were lost to follow-up without documented relapse, or were alive at last follow-up without documented relapse were censored at the date of their last response assessment. (NCT01074047)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) to 40 months; date of the first documented CR or CRi until date of first documented relapse.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine (AZA)10.4
Conventional Care Regimen12.3

[back to top]

Event-free Survival (EFS)

Event-free survival was defined as the interval from the date of randomization to the date of treatment failure, progressive disease, relapse after complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi), death from any cause, or lost to follow-up, whichever occurs first. Participants who were still alive without any of these events were censored at the date of their last response assessment. (NCT01074047)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) to date of treatment failure, progressive disease, relapse after Complete Remission (CR) or Complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi), death from any cause. Day 1 (randomization) to 40 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine (AZA)6.7
Conventional Care Regimens (CCR)4.8

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

One-year Overall Survival Rate

Kaplan Meier methods were used to estimate the 1-year survival probabilities for time to death from any cause. Estimates of the 1-year (365 day) survival probabilities and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were presented by treatment group. The CI for the difference in the 1-year survival probabilities was derived using Greenwoods variance estimate. (NCT01074047)
Timeframe: From Day 1 (randomization) to 40 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Azacitidine (AZA)46.5
Conventional Care Regimen34.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Morphologic CR + CRi as Determined by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) Based on International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

A complete remission (CR) is defined as a leukemia-free state defined as less than 5% blasts in a BM aspirate with marrow spicules and with at least 200 nucleated cells (there should be no blasts with Auer rods), an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of ≥ 1 x 10^9/L, a platelet count ≥ 100 x 10^9/L, and transfusion independence (no transfusions for 1 week prior to each assessment). No duration of these findings is required for confirmation of this response. A CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) is defined as <5% BM blasts with the ANC count < 1 x 10^9/L and/or the platelet count may be < 100 x 10^9/L. Where the date of the hematology assessment used is the earliest on or following the date of the BM sample up to 8 days after the BM date. (NCT01074047)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) to 40 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Azacitidine (AZA)27.8
Conventional Care Regimens (CCR)25.1

[back to top]

Relapse-Free Survival (RFS) for Participants Who Achieved a Complete Remission (CR) or Complete Remission With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi)

Relapse-free survival was defined as the interval from the date of first documented CR or CRi to the date of relapse, death from any cause, or lost to follow-up, whichever occurred first. Participants who were still alive and in continuous CR or CRi were censored at the date of their last response assessment. (NCT01074047)
Timeframe: Day 1 of first documented CR or CRi to the date of relapse, death from any cause, or lost to follow-up. Day 1 (randomization) to 40 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine (AZA)9.3
Conventional Care Regimen10.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants in the Extension Phase With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

AEs = any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen during the course of a study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, regardless of cause. Serious AE (SAE) = any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. The severity of AEs were graded based upon the participants symptoms according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.0); AEs were evaluated for severity according to the following scale: Grade 1 = Mild - transient or mild discomfort; no medical intervention required; Grade 2 = Moderate - mild to moderate limitation in activity; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life threatening; Grade 5 = Death (NCT01074047)
Timeframe: From the date of informed consent for the Extension Phase through to the date of last dose of study drug + 28 days up to last visit completed 24 July 2016; maximum duration of exposure to Azacitidine was 871 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
At least one Treatment Emergent AEAt least one TEAE related to study drugAt least one Grade 3-4 adverse eventAt least 1 Grade 3-4 TEAE related to study drugAt least 1 Grade 5 TEAEAt least 1 Grade 5 TEAE related to study drugAt least 1 serious TEAEAt least 1 serious TEAE related to study drugAt least one serious Grade 3-4 TEAETEAE leading to discontinuation of study drugStudy drug-related TEAE leading to discontinuationTEAE leading to study drug dose reductionTEAE leading to study drug dose interruption onlyTEAE causing study dose reduction/interruption
Azacitidine (AZA)2013137401018311172

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

AEs = any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen during the course of a study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, regardless of cause. Serious AE (SAE) = any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. The severity of AEs were graded based upon the participants symptoms according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.0); AEs were evaluated for severity according to the following scale: Grade 1 = Mild - transient or mild discomfort; no medical intervention required; Grade 2 = Moderate - mild to moderate limitation in activity; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life threatening; Grade 5 = Death (NCT01074047)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) up to last visit completed; final data cut off of 28 Feb 2017

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
At least one Treatment Emergent AEAt least one TEAE related to study drugGrade 3-4 adverse eventGrade 3-4 adverse event related to any study drugAt least one Grade 5 (leading to death) TEAEGrade 5 adverse event related to any study drugSerious TEAESerious TEAE related to any study drugTEAE leading to discontinuation of study drugStudy drug-related TEAE leading to discontinuationTEAE leading to study drug dose reductionTEAE leading to study drug dose interruptionTEAE causing study drug dose reduction/disruption
Azacitidine (AZA)23418820712556121888711022811613
Conventional Care Regimen #1 Intensive Chemotherapy42393729942714115240
Conventional Care Regimen #2 Low-dose Cytarabine1531241419038101185668202617
Conventional Care Regimen #3 Best Supportive Care Only36026023030000000

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Count of surviving participants at 6 months. (NCT01083706)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Chemotherapy)25

[back to top]

Incidence of Grades II-IV Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)

(NCT01083706)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Chemotherapy)25

[back to top]

Rate of Response by IWG Criteria

Count of participants achieving a complete or partial remission at 6 months. (NCT01083706)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Chemotherapy)12

[back to top]

Toxicity Profile (Phase II)

Number of patients experiencing at least one instance of specific treatment emergent adverse events (NCT01093573)
Timeframe: during treatment up to 10 cycles

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose Level 324

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Time to progression after confirmed response (NCT01093573)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventiondays (Median)
Dose Level 3252

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose of Midostaurin in Combination With Azacitidine in Patients With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (Phase I)

Patients received azacitidine 75 mg/m intravenous over 30 minutes daily for 7 consecutive days followed by escalating doses of oral midostaurin (25 mg bid, 50 mg bid, and 75 mg bid) days 8-21. Determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) observed during the first cycle of treatment (NCT01093573)
Timeframe: Day 28

Interventionmg/bid (Number)
Midostaurin Dose Escalation75

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hematologic Improvement (Phase I)

Number of participants with HI. Hematologic improvement (HI): must last at least 2 months in the absence of ongoing cytotoxic therapy and will be another endpoint of interest (although it will not be considered in the final statistical analysis) and will be defined according to IWG criteria . (NCT01093573)
Timeframe: After 2 cycles of therapy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose Level 10
Dose Level 20
Dose Level 32

[back to top]

Overall Survival (Phase II)

Median time of overall survival of participants from initiation of midostaurin-azacitidine (NCT01093573)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventiondays (Median)
Dose Level 3244

[back to top]

Time to Progression

Time to disease progression (TTP) is defined as the time from the start of treatment to the earliest of the date documenting disease progression or most recent assessment for patients having no progression. The distribution of TTP is estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT01105377)
Timeframe: From the start of treatment to the earliest of the date documenting disease progression, assessed up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cohort I1.8
Cohort II1.9

[back to top]

Confirmed Tumor Response

Each evaluable patient is classified as having a confirmed tumor response if they have either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) lasts at least 4 weeks. Tumor response is measured by using RECIST v1.1 (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors). A CR is defined as a disappearance of all target lesions, and each target lymph node must have reduction in short axis to <1.0 cm. A PR is defined as a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter for all target lesions plus the sum of the short axis of all the target lymph nodes at current evaluation, compared to pre-treatment measurements. The confirmed response rate is calculated as the number of confirmed CR+PR, divided by the total number of evaluable patients, with 95% confidence intervals estimated using the approach of Duffy and Santner. (NCT01105377)
Timeframe: At 6 month evaluation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort II0

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

Overall Response Rate (ORR) (NCT01120834)
Timeframe: 2 cycles

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
All Subjects1

[back to top]

Overall Response

"Number of patients with a complete or partial response using Cheson criteria for lymphoma.~A complete response is defined as a complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and disappearance of all disease-related symptoms if present before therapy. A partial response is defined as a greater than or equal to 50% decrease in the sum of the products of the greatest diameters of 6 largest dominant nodes or nodal masses. No increase in size of nodes, liver or spleen and no new sites of disease. Patients who have been on study drug for at least 2 months will be considered evaluable for response as long as they have had repeat imaging to assess response or clear progression based on physical exam." (NCT01121757)
Timeframe: Response will be assessed after at least 4 months on first study drug.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1a-Azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide1
1b-Lenalidomide Followed by Azacitidine0

[back to top]

Response Predicted by Molecular Signatures Compared to True Response

"The predicted response (response to therapy vs. no response to therapy) using gene sequencing will be compared to the overall true response (reported in Primary Outcome 2)." (NCT01121757)
Timeframe: approximately one year

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Predicted: Response; Actual: ResponsePredicted: No Response; Actual: No ResponsePredicted: Response; Actual: No Response
1a-Azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide123
1b-Lenalidomide Followed by Azacitidine030

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Toxicities

Evaluate the safety of lenalidomide, azacitidine and the combination of azacitidine + lenalidomide in patients with lymphoma; grading the adverse events using Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 (NCT01121757)
Timeframe: While taking the study drug and 30 days after the last dose

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade 3Grade 4
1a-Azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide51
1b-Lenalidomide Followed by Azacitidine31

[back to top]

Overall Response

"Number of patients with a complete or partial response using Cheson criteria for lymphoma.~A complete response is defined as a complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and disappearance of all disease-related symptoms if present before therapy. A partial response is defined as a greater than or equal to 50% decrease in the sum of the products of the greatest diameters of 6 largest dominant nodes or nodal masses. No increase in size of nodes, liver or spleen and no new sites of disease. Patients who have been on study drug for at least 2 months will be considered evaluable for response as long as they have had repeat imaging to assess response or clear progression based on physical exam." (NCT01121757)
Timeframe: Response will be assessed after at least 4 months on second drug.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1a-Azacitidine Followed by Lenalidomide2
1b-Lenalidomide Followed by Azacitidine0

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Clinical Benefit and Response According to International Response Criteria

Percent of participants with response according to international response criteria (>= PR) and percent of participants with clinical benefit response (>= minor response according to adapted EBMT criteria). Determined with serum and 24 hour urine protein electrophoresis, and as appropriate, supplemented by immunofixation, serum free light chain assay, and bone marrow examination. Response before high dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplant will also be confirmed by two separate blood and 24 hour urine tests between the last dose of combination therapy and the first dose of the mobilizing agent. (NCT01155583)
Timeframe: at 12 months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
International response criteria (>= PR)clinical benefit response (>= minor response)
Overall Study - (Azacitidine/Lenalidomide/Dexamethasone)2232
Participants Who Received HTLD/HTLD-CKD2332

[back to top]

Phase I: Highest Tolerated Low Dose (HTLD)

Azacitidine given at low but increasing doses up to 50mg/m2 twice a week. Maximum tolerated dose reported. (NCT01155583)
Timeframe: During the first 28-day cycle

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
Arm A - Azacitidine/Lenalidomide/Dexamethasone50
Arm B - CKD Azacitidine/Lenalidomide/Dexamethasone50

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival will be measured from study entry to death from any cause - median months survival will be reported (NCT01155583)
Timeframe: up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Overall Study - (Azacitidine/Lenalidomide/Dexamethasone)18.6

[back to top]

Median Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Median PFS, measured in months from study entry to progression as defined by international response criteria or death of any cause, whichever comes first (NCT01155583)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Overall Study - (Azacitidine/Lenalidomide/Dexamethasone)3.1

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Clinical Benefit and Response According to International Response Criteria

Percent of participants with response according to international response criteria (>= PR) and percent of participants with clinical benefit response (>= minor response according to adapted EBMT criteria). Determined with serum and 24 hour urine protein electrophoresis, and as appropriate, supplemented by immunofixation, serum free light chain assay, and bone marrow examination. Response before high dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplant will also be confirmed by two separate blood and 24 hour urine tests between the last dose of combination therapy and the first dose of the mobilizing agent. (NCT01155583)
Timeframe: at 6 months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
international response criteria (>= PR)clinical benefit response (>= minor response)
Overall Study - (Azacitidine/Lenalidomide/Dexamethasone)2032
Participants Who Received HTLD/HTLD-CKD2332

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With Bone Marrow Evidence of Terminal Differentiation Response to Therapy.

Number of participants who, after therapy, had more of the differentiated types of blood (red cells, platelets, and white cells) compared to abnormal bone marrow cells than before therapy (NCT01165996)
Timeframe: 6 weeks after treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm I: Decitabine 0.2mg/kg11

[back to top]

Number of Patients That Experience > Grade 2 Non-hematologic Toxicity by National Cancer Institute (NCI)/Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) v4 Criteria

Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) will be presented in tables that include causality, seriousness, severity/grade, and whether the AE resulted in death or discontinuation of treatment, Laboratory data will be summarized in tables that show changes from pre-treatment values and frequencies of abnormal values. Descriptive statistics will also be provided. (NCT01165996)
Timeframe: up to 12 months of treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm I: Decitabine 0.2mg/kg16

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With Pharmacodynamic Evidence of Drug Effect.

Evidence of pharmacodynamic effect will be correlated with clinical response criteria. The pharmacodynamic effect of treatment is defined as the number of participants that had depletion DNMT1 with minimal DNA damage and cytotoxicity. (NCT01165996)
Timeframe: 6 weeks after treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm I: Decitabine 0.2mg/kg25

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With Bone Marrow Evidence of Cytotoxicity.

Cytotoxicity is the ability to destroy cells. This will be measured by taking bone marrow samples and measuring the damage to cells. The level of cell destruction will be correlated with clinical response criteria. (NCT01165996)
Timeframe: 6 weeks after treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete cytogenetic remissionPartial cytogenetic remission
Arm I: Decitabine 0.2mg/kg52

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Response as Defined by IWG (International Working Group) Criteria for Myelodysplasia

Complete Response (CR) include less than 5% marrow blasts without evidence of dysplasia and normalization of peripheral blood counts, including a hemoglobin level of 110 g/L or more, a neutrophil count of 1.5 × 109/L or more, and a platelet count of 100 × 109/L or more. For PR, patients must demonstrate all CR criteria if abnormal before treatment except that marrow blasts should decrease by 50% or more compared with pretreatment levels, or patients may demonstrate a less-advanced MDS disease category than prior to treatment. Stable disease (SD) is defined by failure to achieve at least a partial response but no evidence of progression. Disease progression (DP) includes at least 50% decrease from maximum remission in granulocytes or platelets, reduction in hemoglobin by greater than or equal to 2g/dL, or transfusion dependence. Hematologic improvement (HI) includes hemoglobin increase by at least 1.5g/dL, reduction in transfusions, increase of platelets, increase of neutrophil count (NCT01165996)
Timeframe: Formal assessment at week 12 for study primary end-point (hematologic improvement).

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Hematologic ImprovementComplete RemissionPartial RemissionStable DiseaseDisease Progression
Arm I: Decitabine 0.2mg/kg74095

[back to top]

Cytogenetic Response as Per IWG Criteria

Described as the number of patients with a major cytogenetic response (refers to disappearance of a cytogenetic abnormality) or a minor cytogenetic response (50% or more reduction of abnormal metaphases). (NCT01165996)
Timeframe: at 12 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
complete cytogenetic remissionpartial cytogenetic remissionno cytogenetic remission
Arm I: Decitabine 0.2mg/kg524

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With Particular Genetic Abnormalities Detected by Whole Exome Sequencing Correlation With Clinical Response

Proportion of patients with particular genetic abnormalities, including DNA Methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) depletion, detected by whole exome sequencing correlation with clinical response (NCT01165996)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm I: Decitabine 0.2mg/kg4

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival rate (percentage) at 2 and 5 years is defined as the percentage of patients who are still alive 2 and 5 years after date of transplantation respectively. Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit estimator. (NCT01168219)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
OS at 2 yearsOS at 5 years
Treatment (Chemotherapy and Transplant)45.731.2

[back to top]

100-day Mortality

The number of death reported within the first 100 days after transplant. (NCT01168219)
Timeframe: Up to 100 days post-treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Chemotherapy and Transplant)10

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

"Progression-free survival rate (percentage) at 2 and 5 years is defined as the percentage of patients who are alive and progression free at 2 and 5 years from date of transplantation respectively.~AML progression is defined as:~Reappearance of leukemia blast cells in peripheral blood and > 5% blasts in marrow~If no circulating blasts, but the marrow contains 5-20% blasts, a repeat bone marrow >= 1 week later with > 5% blasts~Development of extramedullary leukemia MDS progression is defined as~For patients with <5% bone marrow blasts: ≥50% increase in blasts to >5% blasts~For patients with 5-10% bone marrow blasts: ≥50% increase to >10% blasts~Any of the following: Reappearance of prior documented characteristic cytogenetic abnormality or refractory cytopenias with unequivocal evidence of dysplasia on bone marrow biopsy/aspirate" (NCT01168219)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
PFS at 2 yearsPFS at 5 years
Treatment (Chemotherapy and Transplant)41.226.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants in Different Categories of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events for the Extension Period

Participant counts for a variety of subsets of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs)during the extension study period (43-68 months). Subsets include participants counts for serious TEAEs, serious TEAEs that the investigator evaluated as releated to treatment, TEAEs leading to discontinuation of therapy, or a dose reduction, or a dose interruption. (NCT01186939)
Timeframe: 43- 68 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants with >=1 treatment emergent AE (TEAE)Participants with >=1 treatment related TEAEParticipants with >=1 serious TEAEParticipants with >=1 serious trtment related TEAEParticipants w TEAE leading to discontinued treatParticipants w TEAE leading to dose reductionParticipants w TEAE leading to dose interruption
Azacitidine392720515415

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Azacitidine, and Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (CAPOX)

Dose just below the one at which ≥ 1/3 of subjects experience a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) considered the MTD. (NCT01193517)
Timeframe: Up to 3 weeks from the first dose

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
AzacitidineOxaliplatinCapecitabine
Azacitidine+CAPOX (Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin)751101500

[back to top]

Response Rate of Azacitidine, and Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (CAPOX)

Per Response Evaluation Criteria in solid Tumors Criteria (RECISTv1.0) for target lesions and assessed by CT or MRI: Partial Response (PR), >= 30%decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD), neither PD nor PR, the sum of the longest diameters no change or increase by <20% from baseline or from nadir (smallest sum on treatment); Progressive Disease (PD), the sum of the longest diameters increases by>= 20% from nadir (smallest sum on treatment). For non-target lesions assessed by CT or MRI: Stable Disease (SD), Persistence of >=1 non-target lesion; Progressive Disease (PD), Enlargement of non-target lesions and/or appearance of new lesions. (NCT01193517)
Timeframe: After 9 weeks (three, 21 day cycles)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
NA (Early Progression)PD (Progression Disease)SD (Stable Disease)
Phase I: Highest Dose Level066
Phase I: Starting Dose111
Phase II0110

[back to top]

Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F) of Azacitidine

Apparent volume of distribution, was calculated according to the equation: Vd/F = (CL/F)/λz (NCT01201811)
Timeframe: Timeframe: Day 7 pre-dose and at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose

InterventionLiters (Geometric Mean)
Azacitidine205.3

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC∞) of Azacitidine

Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC∞) following multiple doses of Azacitidine on Day 7; if possible, the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity, calculated by the linear trapezoidal rule and extrapolated to infinity was calculated according to the following equation: AUC∞ = AUCt + (Ct/ λz ), where Ct is the last quantifiable concentration. No AUC extrapolation was performed with unreliable λz. If % AUC extrapolated is ≥ 25%, AUC∞ was not reported. (NCT01201811)
Timeframe: Timeframe: Day 7 pre-dose and at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose

Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Azacitidine859.1

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUCt) of Azacitidine

Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable time point, calculated by the linear trapezoidal rule when concentrations are increasing and the logarithmic trapezoidal method when concentrations are decreasing. (NCT01201811)
Timeframe: Timeframe: Day 7 pre-dose and at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose

Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Azacitidine852.8

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Azacitidine

The observed maximum plasma concentration obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time data. (NCT01201811)
Timeframe: Timeframe: Day 7 pre-dose and at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Azacitidine972.3

[back to top]

Terminal Phase of Half-life (T1/2) of Azacitidine

The apparent terminal half-life was calculated according to the following equation t½ = 0.693/λz. (NCT01201811)
Timeframe: Timeframe: Day 7 pre-dose at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose

Interventionhours (Geometric Mean)
Azacitidine1.0

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Azacitidine

Time to maximum observed plasma concentration obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time data. (NCT01201811)
Timeframe: Timeframe: Day 7 pre-dose and at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose

Interventionhours (Geometric Mean)
Azacitidine0.29

[back to top]

Number of Infections (Post-baseline Average) Requiring Intravenous Antibiotics, Anti-fungals, or Antivirals Per 28 Days

The on-treatment adverse event of infection requiring IV antibiotics, antifungals, or antivirals per 28 days/cycle. The overall post-baseline average is the average of number of infections requiring IV antibiotics or IV antiviral per 28 days/cycle. For each participant the overall post-baseline average was calculated as the average of # of infections requiring IV antibiotics or IV antiviral per 28 days per cycle. (NCT01201811)
Timeframe: Up to week 24; The on-treatment period was considered the period from the date of the first dose to the last treatment study visit.

InterventionInfections per cycle (Mean)
BaselineOverall Post BaselineOverall Change from BaselineCycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Cycle 5Cycle 6
Azacitidine0.10.50.40.50.40.40.10.10.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE)

"An AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes was defined as a serious adverse event (SAE):~Death;~Life-threatening event;~Any inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization;~Persistent or significant disability or incapacity;~Congenital anomaly or birth defect;~Any other important medical event.~The severity of an AE was evaluated by the investigator according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) (Version 4.0) where Grade 1 = Mild, Grade 2 = Moderate, Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Life-threatening and Grade 5 = Death. Treatment Emergent AEs (TEAE) were defined as AEs with an onset date on or after the first dose of study drug and within 28 days after the date of the last dose. In addition, any AE that occurred beyond this timeframe and that was assessed by the investigator as possibly related to study drug was considered a TEAE." (NCT01201811)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study drug through 28 days after completion of/discontinuation from the study (maximum time on study drug 244 days)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
≥ 1 TEAE≥ 1 NCI Grade 3 or 4 TEAE≥ TEAE related to study drug≥ 1 NCI Grade 3 or 4 TEAE related to study drug≥ 1 serious TEAE≥ 1 NCI CTC Grade 3 or 4 serious TEAE≥ 1 serious TEAE related to study drugTEAE leading to discontinuation of study drugTEAE leading to study drug dose reductionTEAE leading to study drug dose interruptionTEAE leading to dose reduction or interruptionTEAE leading to death
Azacitidine443734222824148716207

[back to top]

Number of Platelet Transfusions by Cycle

The number of transfusions received 56 days prior to treatment and during study was standardized per 28 days and summarized by cycle for platelets. The formula for standardizing per 28 days was: [(# of transfusions in the measurement period / length of the measurement period (days)) x 28], where the measurement period was either baseline or the relevant cycle length. For each participant the overall post-baseline average was calculated as the average of # of platelet transfusions per cycle. (NCT01201811)
Timeframe: Up to week 24; The on-treatment period was considered the period from the date of the first dose to the last treatment study visit.

InterventionTransfusions (Mean)
Baseline ( N = 44)Overall Post-Baseline Average ( N= 44)OverallChange from Baseline ( N = 44)Cycle 1 ( N = 44)Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Cycle 5Cycle 6
Azacitidine0.92.71.82.62.33.01.61.92.7

[back to top]

Number of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions by Cycle

The number of transfusions received 56 days prior to treatment and during study were standardized per 28 days and summarized by cycle for RBCs. The formula for standardizing per 28 days was: [(# of transfusions in the measurement period / length of the measurement period (days)) x 28], where the measurement period was either baseline or the relevant cycle length. For each participant the overall post-baseline average was calculated as the average of # of RBC transfusions per cycle. (NCT01201811)
Timeframe: Up to week 24;The on-treatment period was considered the period from the date of the first dose to the last treatment study visit.

InterventionTransfusions (Mean)
Baseline (N = 44)Overall Post-Baseline Average (N = 44)overall Change from Baseline ( N = 44)Cycle 1 ( N = 44)Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Cycle 5Cycle 6
Azacitidine1.32.41.02.52.32.21.51.41.9

[back to top]

Participants' Platelet Transfusion Status for Participants Who Were Transfusion Dependent at Baseline

"A participant was considered platelet transfusion dependent at baseline if the participant had one or more platelet transfusions during the 56 days prior to first dose. During the study, a participant was considered platelet transfusion independent during the on-treatment period if the participant had no platelet transfusions during any 56 consecutive days or more (eg, Days 1 through 56, Days 2 through 57, etc.). Otherwise, they were considered platelet transfusion dependent.~The total N=44, but 1 participant can only be dependent or independent at baseline for each type of transfusion (ie, total = 44: platelet dependent at BL=18, platelet independent at BL=26)" (NCT01201811)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 6; The on-treatment period was considered the period from the date of the first dose to the last treatment study visit.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Baseline Dependent; On-Treatment IndependentBaseline Dependent; On-Treatment Dependent
Azacitidine38.961.1

[back to top]

Participants' Platelet Transfusion Status for Participants Who Were Transfusion Independent at Baseline

"A participant was considered platelet transfusion independent at baseline if the participant had no platelet transfusions during the 56 days prior to first dose. During the study, a participant was considered platelet transfusion independent during the on-treatment period if the participant had no platelet transfusions during any 56 consecutive days or more (eg, Days 1 through 56, Days 2 through 57, etc.). Otherwise, they were considered platelet transfusion dependent.~The total N=44, but 1 participant can only be dependent or independent at baseline for each type of transfusion (ie, total = 44: platelet dependent at BL=18, platelet independent at BL=26)" (NCT01201811)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 6; The on-treatment period was considered the period from the date of the first dose to the last treatment study visit.

Interventionpercentage of particpants (Number)
Baseline Independent: On-Treatment IndependentBaseline Independent; On-Treatment Dependent
Azacitidine76.923.1

[back to top]

Participants' Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Status for Participants Who Were Transfusion Dependent at Baseline

"A participant was considered transfusion dependent at baseline if the participant had one or more Red Blood Cell transfusions during the 56 days prior to first dose. During the study, a participant was considered transfusion independent during the on-treatment period if the participant had no transfusions during any 56 consecutive days or more (e.g., Day 1 through 56, Day 2 through 57, etc). Otherwise, they were considered transfusion dependent.~The total N=44, but 1 participant can only be dependent or independent at baseline for each type of transfusion (ie, total = 44: RBC dependent at BL=32, RBC independent at BL=12)" (NCT01201811)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 6; The on-treatment period was considered the period from the date of the first dose to the last treatment study visit

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Baseline Dependent: On-Treatment IndependentBaseline Dependent; On-Treatment Dependent
Azacitidine37.562.5

[back to top]

Participants' Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Status for Participants Who Were Transfusion Independent at Baseline

"A participant was considered RBC transfusion-independent at baseline if the participant had no RBC transfusions during the 56 days prior to first dose. During the study, a participant was considered transfusion independent during the on-treatment period if the participant had no RBC transfusions during any 56 consecutive days or more (eg, Days 1 through 56, Days 2 through 57, etc.). Otherwise, they were considered transfusion dependent.~The total N=44, but 1 participant can only be dependent or independent at baseline for each type of transfusion (ie, total = 44: RBC dependent at BL=32, RBC independent at BL=12)" (NCT01201811)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 6; The on-treatment period was considered the period from the date of the first dose to the last treatment study visit.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Baseline Independent; On-Treatment IndependentBaseline Independent; On-Treatment Dependent
Azacitidine75.025.0

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Hematologic Response Using International Working Group (IWG) Criteria for Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and Assessed by Investigator

"Hematologic Response according to the 2000 International Working Group (IWG) response criteria for MDS was based on the Investigators determination and defined as:~Complete Response (CR): repeat bone marrow (BM) shows <5% myeloblasts, and peripheral blood values lasting ≥ 2 months of hemoglobin (hgb) (>110 g/L), neutrophils (≥1.5x10^9/L), platelets (≥100x10^9/L), blasts (0%) and no dysplasia~Partial Response (PR): same as CR for peripheral blood: BM shows blasts decrease by ≥ 50% or a less advanced FAB classification from pretreatment~Stable disease (SD): failure to achieve a PR, no evidence of progression for at least 2 months.~Failure: death during treatment or disease progression~Relapse After CR or PR: return to pretreatment BM blast percent or decrement of ≥ 50% from remission/response levels in granulocytes or platelets; or reduction in hgb by ≥20 g/L or transfusion dependence~Disease Progression: change in blast levels~Disease Transformation to AML" (NCT01201811)
Timeframe: Response assessed at end of cycle 6; through week 24; End of study

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Overall (CR+PR)Overall (CR+PR+SD)Complete Remission (CR)Partial Remission (PR)Stable Disease (SD)Disease Progression (DP)Transformation to AMLFailureNo Response Assessed
Azacitidine063.60.00.063.62.34.54.525.0

[back to top]

Apparent Total Plasma Clearance (CL/F) of Azacitidine

Apparent total plasma clearance (CL/F) of Azacitidine was calculated as Dose/AUC∞ (NCT01201811)
Timeframe: Timeframe: Days 5 and 6 at predose and Day 7 (pre-dose) at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post-dose

InterventionL/hr (Geometric Mean)
Azacitidine149.6

[back to top]

Overall Response (OR) Within 6 Months

Overall response defined as number of participants with response as follows: (OR = CR [complete response (CR) rate] + CRi [complete remission with incomplete count recovery] + PR [partial remission] + HI [hematologic improvement]) within 6 months of treatment initiation. complete remission (CR), a CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery (CRi), a morphologic leukemia-free status (MLFS), or a partial remission (PR). CR: <5% bone marrow blasts, neutrophil count>1.0 X10⁹/L, & platelet count>100 X10⁹/L. CRi: all CR criteria except residual neutropenia (<1.0 X10⁹/L) or thrombocytopenia (<100 X10⁹/L). MLFS: <5% blasts in bone marrow regardless of neutrophil & platelet count in peripheral blood. PR: all CR criteria, except reduction> 50% in bone marrow blasts, but still >5%. (NCT01202877)
Timeframe: 6 Months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Phase I: 5-azacytidine + PKC412 25 mg1
Phase I: 5-azacytidine + PKC412 50 mg1
Phase II: 5-azacytidine + PKC41212

[back to top]

Participant Best Response Assessed Using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1

Criteria for response per international working group for Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) & acute myeloid leukemia (AML) where responders obtained a complete remission (CR), a CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery (CRi), a morphologic leukemia-free status (MLFS), or a partial remission (PR). CR: <5% bone marrow blasts, neutrophil count>1.0 X10⁹/L, & platelet count>100 X10⁹/L. CRi: all CR criteria except residual neutropenia (<1.0 X10⁹/L) or thrombocytopenia (<100 X10⁹/L). MLFS: <5% blasts in bone marrow regardless of neutrophil & platelet count in peripheral blood. PR: all CR criteria, except reduction> 50% in bone marrow blasts, but still >5%. Clinical responses evaluated using RECIST version 1.1 criteria after every two cycles, with confirmation of clinical response at 4 weeks after achieving response. (NCT01202877)
Timeframe: 6 months

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete Remission (CR)Complete w/Incomplete Bone Marrow Recovery (CRi)Morphologic Leukemia-Free Status (MLFS)Partial Remission (PR)
Phase I: 5-azacytidine + PKC412 25 mg0100
Phase I: 5-azacytidine + PKC412 50 mg0100
Phase II: 5-azacytidine + PKC4121461

[back to top]

the Rate of Response to the Combination of Azacitidine + Lenalidomide in Select Patients

the rate of response to the combination of azacitidine + lenalidomide in select patients with relapsed/refractory CLL and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). (NCT01241786)
Timeframe: 9 Months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Study Terminated0

[back to top]

The Progression Free Survival of Patients Treated With the Combination of Lenalidomide and Azacitidine

(NCT01241786)
Timeframe: 9 Months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Revlamid + Vidaza1

[back to top]

The Overall Survival of Patients Treated With the Combination of Lenalidomide and Azacitidine

(NCT01241786)
Timeframe: 9 Months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Revlamid + Vidaza5

[back to top] [back to top]

Phase II: Number of Participants With Response

Response according to International Working Group response criteria for Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (JCO 2003; 21: 4642-9): CR defined by presence of <5% blasts in the bone marrow (BM), with >1 X 10^9/L neutrophils and >100 x 10^9/L platelets in the peripheral blood (PB) with no detectable extramedullary disease. Participants who met the above criteria but had neutrophil or platelet counts less than the stated values were considered to have achieved CRi (CR with incomplete recovery of PB counts) or CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) if CR but platelets < 100 x 10^9/L but ≥ 50 x 10^9/L and platelet transfusion independent. Partial response (PR) required all of the hematologic values for a CR but with a decrease of >/= 50% in the percentage of blasts to 5% to 25% in the BM aspirate. (NCT01254890)
Timeframe: 90 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete Response (CR)Complete Remission Without Platelet Recovery (CRi)Partial ResponseComplete Response (CRp)No Response
Azacitidine + Sorafenib8101623

[back to top]

Phase I: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Sorafenib Given With Azacitidine

MTD is defined as highest dose level in which 6 patients treated with at most 1 experiencing a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) during 1st cycle. One cycle of therapy is 7 days of azacitidine (AZA) and 28 days of sorafenib. Starting dose of Sorafenib is 200 mg twice a day azacitidine (NCT01254890)
Timeframe: 28 day cycle

Interventionmg/twice daily (Number)
Azacitidine + Sorafenib400

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Median number of months without progression. Estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT01349959)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
TNBCHRBC
Treatment (Entinostat and Azacitidine)1.41.8

[back to top]

Confirmed Response Rate (Percentage of Participants With Complete or Partial Response Noted as the Objective Status on Two Consecutive Evaluations at Least 4 Weeks Apart) Assessed by RECIST

Percentage of participants with complete or partial response will be estimated independently for each cohort by the number of successes divided by the total number of evaluable patients. Confidence intervals for the true success proportion will be calculated according to the approach of Duffy and Santner. (NCT01349959)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Triple-negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)Hormone-resistant Breast Cancer (HRBC)
Treatment (Entinostat and Azacitidine)04

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Change in Gene Methylation Evaluated Using Quantitative Multiple Methylation-specific Polymerase Chain Reaction (QM-MSP)

(NCT01349959)
Timeframe: Up to 8 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TNBCHRBC
Treatment (Entinostat and Azacitidine)014

[back to top]

Confirmed Response Rate to Azacitidine and Entinostat Plus the Addition of Hormone Therapy

Will be estimated in each cohort. All evaluable patients who receive hormonal therapy will be used for this analysis. (NCT01349959)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TNBCHRBC
Treatment (Entinostat and Azacitidine)01

[back to top]

Clinical Benefit Rate

Clinical benefit rate estimated by the number of patients who achieve a confirmed response plus the number of patients who have stable disease for a duration of at least 6 months divided by the total number of evaluable patients. All evaluable patients will be used for this analysis. (NCT01349959)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TNBCHRBC
Treatment (Entinostat and Azacitidine)01

[back to top]

Feasibility of the Addition of Hormone Therapy, Evaluated by Calculating the Number of Patients With Disease Progression That go on to Receive Hormonal Therapy

(NCT01349959)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TNBCHRBC
Treatment (Entinostat and Azacitidine)412

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Change in Expression of Relevant Genes (e.g., ER Alpha and RAR Beta) Evaluated by Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)

Number of participants with a change in candidate gene re-expression of ER-alpha and RAR beta evaluated by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). (NCT01349959)
Timeframe: Baseline to up to 8 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TNBCHRBC
Treatment (Entinostat and Azacitidine)014

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Median number of months alive, estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT01349959)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
TNBCHRBC
Treatment (Entinostat and Azacitidine)6.612.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Complete Hematologic Response (According to IWG 2006 Criteria) in CMML Patients Treated With 5-azacitidine.

Complete Hematologic Response is defined as: bone marrow evaluation shows <= 5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cells lines; peripheral blood evaluation shows hemoglobin >= 11 g/dL, neutrophils >= 1000/mL, platelets >= 100,000/mL, 0% blasts (NCT01350947)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Arm 1 - 5-Azacitidine27

[back to top]

Kaplan Meier Estimates for One Year Survival

One-year survival rate was defined as all deaths within one year from the date of randomization. All others censored at the at year 1 or date of discontinuation (NCT01358734)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Lenalidomide3.00
Azacitidine Plus Lenalidomide9.61
Azacitidine13.67

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Second Primary Malignancy

Second primary malignancies were monitored as events of interest and reported as serious adverse events regardless of the treatment arm the participant was enrolled in. (NCT01358734)
Timeframe: From randomization of the last participant up to a minimum of 4 years following discontinuation

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Lenalidomide0
Azacitidine Plus Lenalidomide0
Azacitidine3

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall Survival reported at the end of the study are for those participants who were alive at the end of the study (NCT01358734)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of the first documented date of progression or date of death of any cause; the overall median follow-up for survivng participants was 4.1 months (range 0.2 to 54.8 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Lenalidomide0.2
Azacitidine Plus Lenalidomide7.1
Azacitidine4.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Alive at One Year

Defined as the percentage of participants who survived at one year (NCT01358734)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Lenalidomide21.4
Azacitidine Plus Lenalidomide43.9
Azacitidine52.3

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

TEAEs were defined as those events that started on or after the first day of study drug up until 28 days after the last dose of study drug; Serious AE (SAE) = any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. Severity of AEs were graded based upon the participants symptoms according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.0); and according to the scale: Grade (Gr) 1 = Mild - transient or mild discomfort; no medical intervention required; Grade 2 = Moderate - mild to moderate limitation in activity; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life threatening; Grade 5 = Death (NCT01358734)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study drug up to 28 days after the last dose of study drug; up to 15 May 2018

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any TEAE≥1 TEAE related to study drug≥1 TEAE CTCAE Grade 3 or 4 TEAE≥1 TEAE CTCAE Gr 3 or 4 TEAE related to study drug≥1 TEAE CTCAE Grade 5≥1 Serious TEAE≥1 Serious TEAE related to study drug≥1TEAE leading to discontinuation of study drug≥1TEAE leading to dose reduction of study drug≥1TEAE leading to dose interruption of study drug
Azacitidine3230291852574210
Azacitidine Plus Lenalidomide3835342510291612821
Lenalidomide1413141151310608

[back to top]

Median Duration of Response

The median duration of response was defined by the median duration of response for participants with Complete Response (CR); CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi); or Partial Response (PR). (NCT01442714)
Timeframe: 203 days

Interventiondays (Median)
Azacitidine Plus Lenalidomide118

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

Overall response rate was defined as the sum of Complete Response (CR) + CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) + Partial Response (PR). (NCT01442714)
Timeframe: 203 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Azacitidine Plus Lenalidomide5

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Survival was measured from the 1st day of azacitidine treatment to death from any cause. (NCT01442714)
Timeframe: 462 Days

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine Plus Lenalidomide5

[back to top]

Response Rate of Patients With Steroid-refractory Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD) Using Cyclophospahmide and Sirolimus Combined With 3 Variations of Low-dose IL 2 and Low-dose Vidaza.

The primary objective of this study is to determine the response rate of patients treated steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) using cyclophospahmide and sirolimus combined with 3 variations of low-dose IL 2 and low-dose Vidaza with an outcome goal of promoting CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ Tregs. (NCT01453140)
Timeframe: 28 days to 100 days post transplant

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Cyclophosphamide and Sirolimus0

[back to top]

Overall Survival

OS is calculated for all patients from the date of initial registration to date of death due to any cause. The follow- up for patients last known to be alive is censored at the date of last contact. OS will be estimated for each of the three arms using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT01522976)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

InterventionDays (Median)
Arm 1: Azacitidine/Lenalidomide588
Arm 2: Azacitidine449
Arm 3: Azacitidine/Vorinostat527

[back to top]

Relapse-free Survival

RFS is calculated for patients who have achieved a response. RFS will be measured from the date of response to the date of first documentation of relapse from response (as defined in the primary objective), or death due to any cause. The follow-up for patients last known to be alive and without report of relapse is censored at the date of last contact. RFS will be estimated for each of the three arms using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT01522976)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

InterventionDays (Median)
Arm 1: Azacitidine/Lenalidomide435
Arm 2: Azacitidine311
Arm 3: Azacitidine/Vorinostat455

[back to top]

Pre-study Cytogenetic Abnormalities

Cytogenetic risk group is used to identify cytogenetic abnormalities. (NCT01522976)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Good/very goodIntermediatePoorVery poorMissing
Arm 1: Azacitidine/Lenalidomide351382314
Arm 2: Azacitidine2916102314
Arm 3: Azacitidine/Vorinostat341881913

[back to top]

Toxicity Rate

Adverse events that are possibly, probably or definitely related to study drug are reported. (NCT01522976)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Abdominal infectionAbdominal painAcute kidney injuryAdult respiratory distress syndromeAlanine aminotransferase increasedAnemiaAnorectal infectionAnorexiaApneaAscitesAspartate aminotransferase increasedAtaxiaBack painBlood and lymphatic system disorders - OtherBlood bilirubin increasedBronchial infectionCD4 lymphocytes decreasedCardiac arrestCatheter related infectionCecal infectionCholecystitisColitisConfusionConstipationCreatinine increasedDehydrationDeliriumDiarrheaDizzinessDyspneaEpistaxisEsophageal painEsophagitisFallFatigueFebrile neutropeniaFeverFlushingGastric hemorrhageGastrointestinal painGeneral disorders and admin site conditions-OtherGeneralized muscle weaknessHallucinationsHeadacheHeart failureHematomaHematuriaHyperglycemiaHypernatremiaHypertensionHyperuricemiaHypoalbuminemiaHypokalemiaHypomagnesemiaHyponatremiaHypophosphatemiaHypotensionHypoxiaInfections and infestations - Other, specifyIntracranial hemorrhageInvestigations - Other, specifyLeukocytosisLower gastrointestinal hemorrhageLung infectionLymphocyte count decreasedLymphocyte count increasedMucosal infectionMucositis oralNauseaNeutrophil count decreasedPainPapulopustular rashPericardial effusionPlatelet count decreasedPneumonitisPruritusPulmonary edemaPurpuraRash maculo-papularRenal and urinary disorders - Other, specifyRespiratory failureSepsisSinus bradycardiaSkin infectionSoft tissue infectionSudden death NOSSyncopeThromboembolic eventTooth infectionUpper gastrointestinal hemorrhageUpper respiratory infectionUrinary tract infectionVascular disorders - Other, specifyVomitingWeight lossWhite blood cell decreased
Arm 1: Azacitidine/Lenalidomide1101048040100100011100002250514001091600011300001101034151404110041400116911161010113004131021000101148
Arm 2: Azacitidine00000370000000200002000010100020000611000001000001100000100020010191002480004600003002011100001101034
Arm 3: Azacitidine/Vorinostat031054413113101310011111103130311011413211103111122021010423150002231102630006410101113020041110111044

[back to top]

Response Rate (Phase II)

A response is any of complete hematological remission, partial remission, or hematologic improvement. (NCT01522976)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of patients having a response (Number)
Arm 1: Azacitidine/Lenalidomide49
Arm 2: Azacitidine38
Arm 3: Azacitidine/Vorinostat27

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is percentage total participants with overall response (Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)) within two treatment cycles. Response based on modified International Working Group (IWG) criteria: Complete response - Bone marrow: 5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines, Persistent dysplasia noted, Peripheral blood Hgb 11 g/dL, Platelets 100x109/L, Neutrophils 1.0x109/L, Blasts 0%. Partial response: All CR criteria if abnormal before treatment except: Bone marrow blasts decreased by 50% over pretreatment but still > 5% , Cellularity and morphology not relevant; Stable disease - Failure to achieve at least PR, but no evidence of progression for > 8 weeks; No Response or Failure - Death during treatment or disease progression characterized by worsening of cytopenias, increase in percentage of bone marrow blasts, or progression to a more advanced MDS French-American-British (FAB) classification subtype than pretreatme (NCT01542684)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 2 treatment cycles (8 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Complete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)No Response
Azacytidine + GM-CSF00100

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the Physical Well-Being Component of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An) Endpoints at Cycle 6

The FACT-An questionnaire is a 47-item, cancer specific questionnaire consisting of a core 27 items measuring 4 general domains physical well being (PWG), social/family (SWB), emotional well being (EWB) and Functional Well-Being (FWB) and an additional 20-item anemia questionnaire that measures fatigue associated items and 7 non-fatigue items. The scales are formatted on 1 to 4 pages for self-administration using a 5-point Likert rating scale (0 = Not at all; 1 = A little bit; 2 = Somewhat; 3 = Quite a Bit and 4 = Very much). Also, general health related quality of life (HRQoL), the FACT-An measures the impact of fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms on patient functioning and is used to assess the effect of treatments in various therapeutic areas, including MDS. The instrument and the fatigue and non-fatigue subscales are scored by summing points from all questions, then converting this sum to a 100 point scale; 0 indicates the poorest QOL and 100 denotes the highest QOL. (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 6 Day 1

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care0.2
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care-0.8

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the Functional Well-Being Component of the FACT-An Instrument at Cycle 6

The FACT-An questionnaire is a 47-item, cancer specific questionnaire consisting of a core 27 items measuring 4 general domains physical well being (PWG), social/family (SWB), emotional well being (EWB) and Functional Well-Being (FWB) and an additional 20-item anemia questionnaire that measures fatigue associated items and 7 non-fatigue items. The scales are formatted on 1 to 4 pages for self-administration using a 5-point Likert rating scale (0 = Not at all; 1 = A little bit; 2 = Somewhat; 3 = Quite a Bit and 4 = Very much). Also, general health related quality of life (HRQoL), the FACT-An measures the impact of fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms on patient functioning and is used to assess the effect of treatments in various therapeutic areas, including MDS. The instrument and the fatigue and non-fatigue subscales are scored by summing points from all questions, then converting this sum to a 100 point scale; 0 indicates the poorest QOL and 100 denotes the highest QOL. (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 6 Day 1

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care0.5
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care-1.2

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia-Total Score at Cycle 6

"The FACT-G and the anemia subscale (AnS) are summed to form the FACT-An total score and the total score ranges from 0 to 188. The FACT-G measures the 4 domains on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The 4 domains are:~Physical Well-being (PWB; 7 items; score range, 0-28),~Social/Family Well-being (SWB; 7 items; score range, 0-28),~Emotional Well-being (EWB; 6 items; score range, 0-24), and~Functional Well-being (7 items; score range, 0-28). The AnS consists of 20 items on the same 5-point scale, with 13 of them measuring fatigue-related symptoms (FS) and 7 measuring non-FS. The AnS and FS scores can range from 0-80 and 0-52, respectively. For all domains and summary subscales, a higher score indicates better HRQoL or lower level of symptoms." (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 6 Day 1

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care4.5
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care-3.5

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia-General (FACT-G) Summary Scale Within the FACT-An Instrument at Cycle 6

"The FACT-An is a 47-item, cancer-specific questionnaire consisting of a core 27-item general questionnaire (i.e., the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General [FACT-G]) The FACT-G measures the 4 domains on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The 4 domains are:~Physical Well-being (PWB; 7 items; score range, 0-28),~Social/Family Well-being (SWB; 7 items; score range, 0-28),~Emotional Well-being (EWB; 6 items; score range, 0-24), and~Functional Well-being (7 items; score range, 0-28). The FACT-G is a summation composed of a summary scale including the PWB, SWB, EWB and FWB. The FACT-G score range is from 0 to 108. For all summary scales including FACT-G, a higher score indicates better HRQoL or lower level of symptoms." (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 6 Day 1

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care1.6
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care-2.9

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia Trial Outcome Index (FACT-An TOI) Summary Scale Within the FACT-An Instrument at Cycle 6

"The FACT-G and FACT-An score are summed to form the FACT-An total score. The FACT-An Trial Outcome Index (TOI) consists of the summation of a summary scale and includes the Physical Well-being, (PWB; 7 items; score range, 0-28), the Functional Well-being (7 items; score range, 0-28) and the Anemia subscale consisting of 20 items on the same five-point scale, with 13 of them measuring fatigue related symptoms (FS) and seven measuring non-FS. The FACT-An TOI has been demonstrated to be a sensitive indicator of clinical outcomes in a number of diseases including MDS. The Fact-TOI score ranges from 0 to 136. Higher scores on all scales of the Fact-An and subscales on the FACT-TOI reflect better quality of life or fewer symptoms." (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 6 Day 1

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care3.7
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care-2.7

[back to top] [back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the Emotional Well-Being Component of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia Instrument at Cycle 6

The FACT-An questionnaire is a 47-item, cancer specific questionnaire consisting of a core 27 items measuring 4 general domains physical well being (PWG), social/family (SWB), emotional well being (EWB) and Functional Well-Being (FWB) and an additional 20-item anemia questionnaire that measures fatigue associated items and 7 non-fatigue items. The scales are formatted on 1 to 4 pages for self-administration using a 5-point Likert rating scale (0 = Not at all; 1 = A little bit; 2 = Somewhat; 3 = Quite a Bit and 4 = Very much). Also, general health related quality of life (HRQoL), the FACT-An measures the impact of fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms on patient functioning and is used to assess the effect of treatments in various therapeutic areas, including MDS. The instrument and the fatigue and non-fatigue subscales are scored by summing points from all questions, then converting this sum to a 100 point scale; 0 indicates the poorest QOL and 100 denotes the highest QOL. (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 6 Day 1

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care1.3
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care0.2

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the Anemia Subscale Within FACT-An Instrument at Cycle 6

The FACT-An questionnaire is a 47-item, cancer specific questionnaire consisting of a core 27 items measuring 4 general domains physical well being (PWG), social/family (SWB), emotional well being (EWB) and Functional Well-Being (FWB) and an additional 20-item anemia questionnaire that measures fatigue associated items and 7 non-fatigue items. The scales are formatted on 1 to 4 pages for self-administration using a 5-point Likert rating scale (0 = Not at all; 1 = A little bit; 2 = Somewhat; 3 = Quite a Bit and 4 = Very much). Also, general health related quality of life (HRQoL), the FACT-An measures the impact of fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms on patient functioning and is used to assess the effect of treatments in various therapeutic areas, including MDS. The instrument and the fatigue and non-fatigue subscales are scored by summing points from all questions, then converting this sum to a 100 point scale; 0 indicates the poorest QOL and 100 denotes the highest QOL. (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 6 Day 1

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care2.9
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care-0.6

[back to top]

Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU): Total Number of Days Hospitalized Due to Any Reason During the Treatment Period

The total number of days hospitalized due to any reason during the treatment period was monitored. HRU was defined as any consumption of healthcare resources directly or indirectly related to the treatment of the patient. (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: From date of randomization up to 28 days after the last dose of study drug; up to data cut off date of 25 January 2019; median duration of treatment to oral azacitaidine was 5.29 months and 5.36 months for placebo

InterventionDays (Number)
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care3513
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care2688

[back to top]

Duration of RBC Transfusion Reduction for Participants Who Achieved RBC Transfusion Reduction of at Least 4 Units of RBCs for at Least 8 Weeks

A participant was considered as a RBC transfusion reduction responder if the participant had at least 4 units reduction in transfusion units over any consecutive 56 days period compared to the baseline transfusion units in 56 days. (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization of study drug up to the treatment period; up to the data cut-off date of 25 January 2019; median duration of treatment to oral azacitidine was 5.29 months and 5.36 months for placebo

Interventionmonths (Median)
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care10.0
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care2.3

[back to top]

Duration of RBC Transfusion Independence Among Participants Who Achieved RBC Transfusion Independence for at Least 84 Days

Duration of RBC transfusion independence was analyzed only for participants who achieved RBC transfusion independence of ≥ 84 days on treatment. Duration of RBC transfusion independence was defined as the time from the date transfusion independence is first observed (day 1 of a ≥ 84 days period without a transfusion) until the date the participants had a subsequently documented RBC transfusion. In case a participant had more than one ≥84 days rolling periods which met the RBC independence criteria, the duration with the longest rolling period was used in the analysis. (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization of study drug up to the treatment period; up to the data cut-off date of 25 January 2019; median duration of treatment to oral azacitidine was 5.29 months and 5.36 months for placebo

Interventionmonths (Median)
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care11.1
Placebo Plus Best Supportive CareNA

[back to top]

Duration of RBC Transfusion Independence Among Participants Who Achieved RBC Transfusion Independence for at Least 56 Days

Duration of RBC transfusion independence was analyzed only for participants who achieved RBC transfusion independence of ≥ 56 days on treatment. Duration of RBC transfusion independence was defined as the time from the date transfusion independence is first observed (day 1 of a ≥ 56 days period without a transfusion) until the date the participants had a subsequently documented RBC transfusion. In the event a participant had more than one ≥56 days rolling periods which met the RBC independence criteria, the duration with the longest rolling period was used in the analysis. Participants who maintained RBC TI through the end of the treatment period were censored at the date of treatment discontinuation, death, or 1 day before the start of the subsequent MDS treatment (if any), whichever occurred first, or the particiapnts latest available assessment date in the database if the treatment was still on-going. (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization of study drug up to the data cut-off date of 25 January 2019; median duration of treatment to oral azacitidine was 5.29 months and 5.36 months for placebo

Interventionmonths (Median)
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care11.1
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care12.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Responses to the Fact-Anemia Item GP-5

"The distribution (frequency and percentage) of the observed responses (i.e., Not at all (0), A little bit (1), Somewhat (2), Quite a bit (3), Very much (4), and missing) to Item GP-5 (I am bothered by side effects of treatment in the past seven days) of the FACT-An at each scheduled visit were summarized for each treatment group. The denominator for the percentage calculation per treatment group was based on the number of the FACT-An evaluable population at baseline. The distribution of change in responses (improved [i.e., change score from 1 to 4], no change [0], worsened by one level [-1], worsened by ≥2 levels [-2 to -4], and missing) from baseline at each post-baseline scheduled visit were summarized by treatment group." (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: From Baseline to End of Treatment

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
ImprovedNo ChangeWorsened by 1 LevelWorsened by 2 LevelsMissing
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care2.514.89.99.963.0
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care6.325.38.412.647.4

[back to top]

Time to RBC Transfusion Independence for at Least 56 Days Among Participants Who Achieved RBC Transfusion Independence for at Least 56 Days

Time to RBC transfusion independence of ≥ 56 days was defined as the time between randomization and the date onset of transfusion independence was first observed (ie, Day 1 of 56 without any RBC transfusions). (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization of study drug up to the data cut-off date of 25 January 2019; median duration of treatment to oral azacitidine was 5.29 months and 5.36 months for placebo

InterventionMonths (Median)
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care2.37
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care2.04

[back to top]

Time to RBC Transfusion Independence for at Least 84 Days Among Participants Who Achieved RBC Transfusion Independence for at Least 84 Days

Time to RBC transfusion independence of ≥ 84 days was defined as the time between randomization and the date onset of transfusion independence was first observed (ie, Day 1 of 84 without any RBC transfusions). (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization of study drug up to the treatment period; up to the data cut-off date of 25 January 2019; median duration of treatment to oral azacitidine was 5.29 months and 5.36 months for placebo

InterventionMonths (Median)
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care2.64
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care4.01

[back to top]

Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU): Number of Participants Who Were Hospitalized During the Treatment Period

The number of reasons for hospitalizations and hospital admissions during the treatment period were monitored and include those associated with: AEs, protocol-driven procedures, transfusions, non-protocol procedures, elective procedures or those associated with social, practical or technical reasons in the absence of AEs. HRU was defined as any consumption of healthcare resources directly or indirectly related to the treatment of the patient. (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: From date of randomization up to 28 days after the last dose of study drug; up to data cut off date of 25 January 2019; median duration of treatment to oral azacitaidine was 5.29 months and 5.36 months for placebo

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Adverse EventsProtocol Driven ProceduresNon-Protocol Driven ProceduresTransfusionProcedure Planned Prior to Signing ConsentElective ProceduresSocial, Technical or Practical Reason except AEs
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care792932044
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care65719334106

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Responses to the Fact-Anemia Item GP-5

"The distribution (frequency and percentage) of the observed responses (i.e., Not at all (0), A little bit (1), Somewhat (2), Quite a bit (3), Very much (4), and missing) to Item GP-5 (I am bothered by side effects of treatment in the past seven days) of the FACT-An at each scheduled visit were summarized for each treatment group. The denominator for the percentage calculation per treatment group was based on the number of the FACT-An evaluable population at baseline. The distribution of change in responses (improved [i.e., change score from 1 to 4], no change [0], worsened by one level [-1], worsened by ≥2 levels [-2 to -4], and missing) from baseline at each post-baseline scheduled visit were summarized by treatment group." (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Cycle 6 Day 1 (C6 D1)

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
ImprovedNo ChangeWorsened by 1 LevelWorsened by 2 LevelsMissing
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care1.225.99.914.848.1
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care4.227.412.67.448.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Improved, Worsened, or No Change in the European Quality of Life-Five Dimension-Three Level Usual Activities Dimension Responses at Cycle 6

TThe EQ-5D-3L is a generic, self-administered questionnaire that consists of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, pain, usual activities, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels of severity corresponding to no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. It also includes a Visual Analog Scale that recorded the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, 0-100 scale, where 100 = Best imaginable health state and 0 = Worst imaginable health state. Distribution of the observed responses (i.e., no problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and missing) of the 5 dimensions at each visit was summarized per arm. The denominator for the percentage calculation per group was based on the number of the EQ-5D-3L evaluable population at baseline. The distribution of change in responses (i.e., improved [by ≥1 level], no change, worsened [by ≥1 level], and missing) from baseline are reported. (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Cycle 6 Day 1

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
ImprovedNo ChangeWorsenedMissing
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care11.128.412.348.1
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care3.241.17.448.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Responses to the Fact-Anemia Item GP-5

"The distribution (frequency and percentage) of the observed responses (i.e., Not at all (0), A little bit (1), Somewhat (2), Quite a bit (3), Very much (4), and missing) to Item GP-5 (I am bothered by side effects of treatment in the past seven days) of the FACT-An at each scheduled visit were summarized for each treatment group. The denominator for the percentage calculation per treatment group was based on the number of the FACT-An evaluable population at baseline. The distribution of change in responses (improved [i.e., change score from 1 to 4], no change [0], worsened by one level [-1], worsened by ≥2 levels [-2 to -4], and missing) from baseline at each post-baseline scheduled visit were summarized by treatment group." (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Cycle 4 Day 1 (C4D1)

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
ImprovedNo ChangeWorsened by 1 LevelWorsened by 2 LevelsMissing
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care2.532.116.014.834.6
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care9.537.914.76.331.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

"A TEAE was defined as an adverse event that begins or worsens in intensity of frequency on or after the first dose of study drug through 28 days after last dose of study drug.~A serious adverse event (SAE) is any:~Death;~Life-threatening event;~Any inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization;~Persistent or significant disability or incapacity;~Congenital anomaly or birth defect;~Any other important medical event The investigator determined the relationship of an AE to study drug based on the timing of the AE relative to drug administration and whether or not other drugs, therapeutic interventions, or underlying conditions could provide a sufficient explanation for the event. The severity of an AE was evaluated by the investigator according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) (Version 4.0) where Grade 1 = Mild, Grade 2 = Moderate, Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Life-threatening and Grade 5 = Death." (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: From first dose of IP up to 28 days after the last dose of IP; up to data cut-off date of 25 Jan 2019; median duration of treatment to oral azacitaidine was 5.29 months and 5.36 months for placebo

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
≥ 1 TEAE≥ 1 TEAE Related to Study Drug≥ 1 Serious TEAE≥ 1 Serious TEAE Related to Study Drug≥ 1 Grade (GR) 3-4 TEAE≥ 1 Grade 3-4 TEAE Related to Study Drug≥ 1 Grade (GR) 3-4 Serious TEAE≥ 1 GR 3-4 Serious TEAE Related to Study Drug≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Death≥ 1 TEAE Related to Study Drug Leading to Death≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Dose Interruption≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Dose Interruption/Reduction≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Treatment Discontinuation
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care10710279379673753725931662932
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care108546988019565142440231

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Improvment (CMI) From Baseline on the Physical Well-Being Domain Within the FACT-An Instrument at Cycle 6

A clinically meaningful improvement or deterioration was defined by domain specific thresholds of change from baseline. The FACT-An questionnaire is a 47-item, cancer specific questionnaire consisting of a core 27 items measuring 4 general domains physical well being, social/family, emotional well being and Functional Well-Being and an additional 20-item anemia questionnaire that measures fatigue and 7 non-fatigue items. The scales are formatted on 4 pages for self-administration using a 5-point Likert rating scale (0 = Not at all; 1 = A little bit; 2 = Somewhat; 3 = Quite a Bit and 4 = Very much). Also, general HRQoL measures the impact of fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms on patient functioning and is used to assess the effect of treatments in various areas, including MDS. The instrument and the fatigue and non-fatigue subscales are scored by summing points from all questions, then converting this sum to a 100 point scale; 0 = the poorest QOL and 100 = the highest QOL. (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: Cycle 6 Day 1

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care17.3
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care13.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Improvment (CMI) From Baseline on the Functional Well-Being Domain Within the FACT-An Instrument at Cycle 6

A clinically meaningful improvement or deterioration was defined by domain specific thresholds of change from baseline. The FACT-An questionnaire is a 47-item, cancer specific questionnaire consisting of a core 27 items measuring 4 general domains physical well being, social/family, emotional well being and Functional Well-Being and an additional 20-item anemia questionnaire that measures fatigue and 7 non-fatigue items. The scales are formatted on 4 pages for self-administration using a 5-point Likert rating scale (0 = Not at all; 1 = A little bit; 2 = Somewhat; 3 = Quite a Bit and 4 = Very much). Also, general HRQoL measures the impact of fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms on patient functioning and is used to assess the effect of treatments in various areas, including MDS. The instrument and the fatigue and non-fatigue subscales are scored by summing points from all questions, then converting this sum to a 100 point scale; 0 = the poorest QOL and 100 = the highest QOL. (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: Cycle 6 Day 1

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care14.8
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care8.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Improvment (CMI) From Baseline on the Emotional Well-Being Domain Within the FACT-An Instrument at Cycle 6

A clinically meaningful improvement or deterioration was defined by domain specific thresholds of change from baseline. The FACT-An questionnaire is a 47-item, cancer specific questionnaire consisting of a core 27 items measuring 4 general domains physical well being, social/family, emotional well being and Functional Well-Being and an additional 20-item anemia questionnaire that measures fatigue and 7 non-fatigue items. The scales are formatted on 4 pages for self-administration using a 5-point Likert rating scale (0 = Not at all; 1 = A little bit; 2 = Somewhat; 3 = Quite a Bit and 4 = Very much). Also, general HRQoL measures the impact of fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms on patient functioning and is used to assess the effect of treatments in various areas, including MDS. The instrument and the fatigue and non-fatigue subscales are scored by summing points from all questions, then converting this sum to a 100 point scale; 0 = the poorest QOL and 100 = the highest QOL. (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: Cycle 6 Day 1

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care23.5
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care15.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Improvment (CMI) From Baseline on the Anemia Subscale Domain Within the FACT-An Instrument at Cycle 6

A clinically meaningful improvement or deterioration was defined by domain specific thresholds of change from baseline. The FACT-An questionnaire is a 47-item, cancer specific questionnaire consisting of a core 27 items measuring 4 general domains physical well being, social/family, emotional well being and Functional Well-Being and an additional 20-item anemia questionnaire that measures fatigue and 7 non-fatigue items. The scales are formatted on 4 pages for self-administration using a 5-point Likert rating scale (0 = Not at all; 1 = A little bit; 2 = Somewhat; 3 = Quite a Bit and 4 = Very much). Also, general HRQoL measures the impact of fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms on patient functioning and is used to assess the effect of treatments in various areas, including MDS. The instrument and the fatigue and non-fatigue subscales are scored by summing points from all questions, then converting this sum to a 100 point scale; 0 = the poorest QOL and 100 = the highest QOL. (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: Cycle 6 Day 1

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care27.2
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care15.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Improvment (CMI) From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia-General Subscale Domain Within the FACT-An Instrument at Cycle 6

A clinically meaningful improvement or deterioration was defined by domain specific thresholds of change from baseline. The FACT-An questionnaire is a 47-item, cancer specific questionnaire consisting of a core 27 items measuring 4 general domains physical well being, social/family, emotional well being and Functional Well-Being and an additional 20-item anemia questionnaire that measures fatigue and 7 non-fatigue items. The scales are formatted on 4 pages for self-administration using a 5-point Likert rating scale (0 = Not at all; 1 = A little bit; 2 = Somewhat; 3 = Quite a Bit and 4 = Very much). Also, general HRQoL measures the impact of fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms on patient functioning and is used to assess the effect of treatments in various areas, including MDS. The instrument and the fatigue and non-fatigue subscales are scored by summing points from all questions, then converting this sum to a 100 point scale; 0 = the poorest QOL and 100 = the highest QOL. (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: Cycle 6 Day 1

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care23.5
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care13.7

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the Social Well-Being Component of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia Instrument at Cycle 6

The FACT-An questionnaire is a 47-item, cancer specific questionnaire consisting of a core 27 items measuring 4 general domains physical well being (PWG), social/family (SWB), emotional well being (EWB) and Functional Well-Being (FWB) and an additional 20-item anemia questionnaire that measures fatigue associated items and 7 non-fatigue items. The scales are formatted on 1 to 4 pages for self-administration using a 5-point Likert rating scale (0 = Not at all; 1 = A little bit; 2 = Somewhat; 3 = Quite a Bit and 4 = Very much). Also, general health related quality of life (HRQoL), the FACT-An measures the impact of fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms on patient functioning and is used to assess the effect of treatments in various therapeutic areas, including MDS. The instrument and the fatigue and non-fatigue subscales are scored by summing points from all questions, then converting this sum to a 100 point scale; 0 indicates the poorest QOL and 100 denotes the highest QOL. (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 6 Day 1

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care-0.4
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care-1.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Hematological Improvement Response in Platelets (HI-P) According to 2006 IWG Criteria

HI-P response was defined according to IWG 2006 criteria (Cheson, 2006) and as: 1. Absolute increase of ≥ 30 X 10^9/L for participants^ starting with > 20 X 10^9/L platelets; 2. Increase from < 20 X 10^9/L to > 20 X 10^9/L and by at least 100%. HI-P must have lasted at least 8 weeks. (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization of study drug up to the treatment period; up to the data cut-off date of 25 January 2019; median duration of treatment to oral azacitidine was 5.29 months and 5.36 months for placebo

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care24.3
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care7.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Significant Bleeding Events

Clinically significant bleeding event was defined as: any intracranial or retroperitoneal bleed; bleeding requiring transfusions of > 2 units of blood/blood products; bleeding associated with a decrease in hemoglobin of > 2 g/dL; or bleeding from any site requiring transfusions of > 2 units of blood. (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until 28 days after the last dose of IP; up to data cut off date of 25 January 2019; median duration of treatment to oral azacitidine was 5.29 months and 5.36 months for placebo

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care8.4
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care9.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Improvment (CMI) From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia Trial Outcome Index Subscale Domain Within the FACT-An Instrument at Cycle 6

A clinically meaningful improvement or deterioration was defined by domain specific thresholds of change from baseline. The FACT-An questionnaire is a 47-item, cancer specific questionnaire consisting of a core 27 items measuring 4 general domains physical well being, social/family, emotional well being and Functional Well-Being and an additional 20-item anemia questionnaire that measures fatigue and 7 non-fatigue items. The scales are formatted on 4 pages for self-administration using a 5-point Likert rating scale (0 = Not at all; 1 = A little bit; 2 = Somewhat; 3 = Quite a Bit and 4 = Very much). Also, general HRQoL measures the impact of fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms on patient functioning and is used to assess the effect of treatments in various areas, including MDS. The instrument and the fatigue and non-fatigue subscales are scored by summing points from all questions, then converting this sum to a 100 point scale; 0 = the poorest QOL and 100 = the highest QOL. (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: Cycle 6 Day 1

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care19.8
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care12.6

[back to top]

Time to Platelet Transfusion Independence

Time to platelet transfusion independence was defined as the time between randomization and the first documented date of onset of transfusion independence (ie, Day 1 of 56 without any platelet transfusions). (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization of study drug up to the treatment period; up to the data cut-off date of 25 January 2019; median duration of treatment to oral azacitidine was 5.29 months and 5.36 months for placebo

InterventionMonths (Median)
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care2.04
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care1.48

[back to top]

Time to Progression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Among Participants Who Progressed to AML

"Time to AML progression was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date the subject has documented progression to AML. For participants who had progression to AML documented in MLL central lab report, the earliest sample collection date with the diagnosis of s-AML arising from previous MDS was used as the date to AML progression." (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: From randomization of study drug to progression of AML; up to final data cut-off date of 25 January 2019; median duration of treatment to oral azacitidine was 5.29 months and 5.36 months for placebo

InterventionMonths (Median)
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care17.94
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care9.91

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Improvement (CMI) From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Anemia-Total Score Domain Within the FACT-An Instrument at Cycle 6

A clinically meaningful improvement or deterioration was defined by domain specific thresholds of change from baseline. The FACT-An questionnaire is a 47-item, cancer specific questionnaire consisting of a core 27 items measuring 4 general domains physical well being, social/family, emotional well being and Functional Well-Being and an additional 20-item anemia questionnaire that measures fatigue and 7 non-fatigue items. The scales are formatted on 4 pages for self-administration using a 5-point Likert rating scale (0 = Not at all; 1 = A little bit; 2 = Somewhat; 3 = Quite a Bit and 4 = Very much). Also, general HRQoL measures the impact of fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms on patient functioning and is used to assess the effect of treatments in various areas, including MDS. The instrument and the fatigue and non-fatigue subscales are scored by summing points from all questions, then converting this sum to a 100 point scale; 0 = the poorest QOL and 100 = the highest QOL. (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: Cycle 6 Day 1

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care19.8
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care11.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Platelet Transfusion Independence With a Duration of ≥ 8 Weeks (56 Days)

"Platelet transfusion independence was defined as the absence of any platelet transfusion during any consecutive rolling 56 days during the treatment period, (ie, Day 1 to 56, Day 2 to 57, Days 3 to 58, etc.). Participants were considered platelet transfusion dependent at baseline if they had received ≥ 2 platelet transfusions during the 56 days immediately preceding randomization and had no consecutive 28-day period during which no platelet transfusions were administered." (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization of study drug up to the treatment period; up to the data cut-off date of 25 January 2019; median duration of treatment to oral azacitidine was 5.29 months and 5.36 months for placebo

InterventionPercentage Participants (Number)
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care16.7
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care14.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Progressed to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Participants with a documented diagnosis of AML arising from previous MDS documented diagnosis. (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: From randomization of study drug to the end up to final data cut-off date of 25 January 2019; maximum follow-up time was 67.9 months for azacitidine and 64.8 months for placebo group

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care7.5
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care16.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence for ≥ 84 Days

"RBC transfusion independence was defined as the absence of any RBC transfusion during any consecutive rolling 84 days within the treatment period. Participants who did not receive any RBC transfusion during a consecutive rolling 84 days (i.e., day 1 to day 84, day 2 to day 85) were considered as a 84-day RBC transfusion independent responder." (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization of study drug up to the treatment period; up to the data cut-off date of 25 January 2019; median duration of treatment to oral azacitidine was 5.29 months and 5.36 months for placebo

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care28.0
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care6.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence for ≥ 56 Days

"RBC transfusion (tfx) independence was defined as the absence of any RBC transfusion during any consecutive rolling 56 days within the treatment period. Participants who did not receive any RBC transfusion during a consecutive rolling 56 days (i.e., day 1 to day 56, day 2 to day 57) were considered as a 56-day RBC transfusion independent responder." (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: Each participant was assessed for at least 56 days or more; from the date of randomization of study drug up to the data cut-off date of 25 January 2019, approximately 5 months.

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care30.8
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care11.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Improved, Worsened, or No Change in the European Quality of Life-Five Dimension-Three Level of Self-Care Dimension Responses at Cycle 6

The EQ-5D-3L is a generic, self-administered questionnaire that consists of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, pain, usual activities, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels of severity corresponding to no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. It also includes a Visual Analog Scale that recorded the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, 0-100 scale, where 100 = Best imaginable health state and 0 = Worst imaginable health state. Distribution of the observed responses (i.e., no problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and missing) of the 5 dimensions at each visit was summarized per arm. The denominator for the percentage calculation per group was based on the number of the EQ-5D-3L evaluable population at baseline. The distribution of change in responses (i.e., improved [by ≥1 level], no change, worsened [by ≥1 level], and missing) from baseline are reported. (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Cycle 6 Day 1

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
ImprovedNo ChangeWorsenedMissing
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care2.542.07.448.1
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care4.244.23.248.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Improvment (CMI) From Baseline on the Social Well-Being Domain Within the FACT-An Instrument at Cycle 6

A clinically meaningful improvement or deterioration was defined by domain specific thresholds of change from baseline. The FACT-An questionnaire is a 47-item, cancer specific questionnaire consisting of a core 27 items measuring 4 general domains physical well being, social/family, emotional well being and Functional Well-Being and an additional 20-item anemia questionnaire that measures fatigue and 7 non-fatigue items. The scales are formatted on 4 pages for self-administration using a 5-point Likert rating scale (0 = Not at all; 1 = A little bit; 2 = Somewhat; 3 = Quite a Bit and 4 = Very much). Also, general HRQoL measures the impact of fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms on patient functioning and is used to assess the effect of treatments in various areas, including MDS. The instrument and the fatigue and non-fatigue subscales are scored by summing points from all questions, then converting this sum to a 100 point scale; 0 = the poorest QOL and 100 = the highest QOL. (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: Cycle 6 Day 1

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care11.1
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care14.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Hematologic Response According to the 2006 IWG Criteria for MDS

"Hematologic response was defined as:~A complete response (CR): <5% myeloblasts, and normal maturation of all cell lines; Peripheral blood (PB) shows: hemoglobin >10 g/dL, neutrophils ≥1.0x10^9/L, platelets ≥100x10^9/dL, blasts (0%)~Partial Response (PR): same as CR bone marrow (BM) shows blasts decreased by ≥ 50% over pre-treatment but still > 5%; Cellularity and morphology not relevant~Marrow CR: BM: ≤ 5% myeloblasts and decrease by ≥ 50% over pre-treatment PB~Stable disease (SD): failure to achieve at least PR, but no evidence of progression for > 8 wks~Failure: death during treatment or disease progression~Disease Progression for those with:~Less than 5% blasts: ≥ 50% increase in blasts to > 5% blasts~5%-10% blasts:≥ 50% increase to > 10% blasts~10%-20% blasts:≥ 50% increase to > 20% blasts~20%-30% blasts ≥ 50% increase to > 30% blasts~Any of the following:~≥ 50% decrease from maximum remission/response in granulocytes or platelets" (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: Response was assessed every 3 cycles; up to the data cut-off date of 25 Jan 2019; median duration of exposure to oral azacitidine was 86.0 days and 119.0 days for placebo

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Complete Response (CR)Partial ResponseMarrow CRStable Disease (SD)Disease ProgressionFailure due to Death
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care7.7023.12.862.60.9
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care004.230.346.80.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With an Erythroid Hematological Improvement (HI-E) Response According to 2006 IWG Criteria

Erythroid HI-E improvement was defined as a hemoglobin increase of ≥ 1.5 g/dL; or a reduction in units of RBC transfusions by an absolute number of at least 4 RBC transfusions/8 weeks compared with the pretreatment transfusion number in the previous 8 weeks. Only RBC transfusions given for a hemoglobin of ≤ 9.0 g/dL on treatment were counted in the RBC transfusion response evaluation. (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization of study drug up to the treatment period; up to the data cut-off date of 25 January 2019; median duration of treatment to oral azacitidine was 5.29 months and 5.36 months for placebo

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
HI-E Response≥ 1.5 g/dL Hemoglobin IncreaseRBC Transfusion Reduction
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care43.023.442.1
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care32.15.531.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Responses to the Fact-Anemia Item GP-5

"The distribution (frequency and percentage) of the observed responses (i.e., Not at all (0), A little bit (1), Somewhat (2), Quite a bit (3), Very much (4), and missing) to Item GP-5 (I am bothered by side effects of treatment in the past seven days) of the FACT-An at each scheduled visit were summarized for each treatment group. The denominator for the percentage calculation per treatment group was based on the number of the FACT-An evaluable population at baseline. The distribution of change in responses (improved [i.e., change score from 1 to 4], no change [0], worsened by one level [-1], worsened by ≥2 levels [-2 to -4], and missing) from baseline at each post-baseline scheduled visit were summarized by treatment group." (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1)

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
ImprovedNo ChangeWorsened by 1 LevelWorsened by 2 LevelsMissing
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care2.530.925.923.517.3
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care10.549.523.26.310.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Responses to the Fact-Anemia Item GP-5

"The distribution (frequency and percentage) of the observed responses (i.e., Not at all (0), A little bit (1), Somewhat (2), Quite a bit (3), Very much (4), and missing) to Item GP-5 (I am bothered by side effects of treatment in the past seven days) of the FACT-An at each scheduled visit were summarized for each treatment group. The denominator for the percentage calculation per treatment group was based on the number of the FACT-An evaluable population at baseline. The distribution of change in responses (improved [i.e., change score from 1 to 4], no change [0], worsened by one level [-1], worsened by ≥2 levels [-2 to -4], and missing) from baseline at each post-baseline scheduled visit were summarized by treatment group." (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Cycle 3 Day 1 (C3D1)

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
ImprovedNo ChangeWorsened by 1 LevelWorsened by 2 LevelsMissing
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care7.424.716.023.528.4
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care10.541.118.913.715.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Responses to the Fact-Anemia Item GP-5

"The distribution (frequency and percentage) of the observed responses (i.e., Not at all (0), A little bit (1), Somewhat (2), Quite a bit (3), Very much (4), and missing) to Item GP-5 (I am bothered by side effects of treatment in the past seven days) of the FACT-An at each scheduled visit were summarized for each treatment group. The denominator for the percentage calculation per treatment group was based on the number of the FACT-An evaluable population at baseline. The distribution of change in responses (improved [i.e., change score from 1 to 4], no change [0], worsened by one level [-1], worsened by ≥2 levels [-2 to -4], and missing) from baseline at each post-baseline scheduled visit were summarized by treatment group." (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Cycle 5 Day 1 (C5D1)

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
ImprovedNo ChangeWorsened by 1 LevelWorsened by 2 LevelsMissing
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care2.525.913.68.649.4
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care7.434.712.65.340.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Improved, Worsened, or No Change in the European Quality of Life-Five Dimension-Three Level in the Pain/Discomfort Dimension Responses at Cycle 6

The EQ-5D-3L is a generic, self-administered questionnaire that consists of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, pain, usual activities, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels of severity corresponding to no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. It also includes a Visual Analog Scale that recorded the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, 0-100 scale, where 100 = Best imaginable health state and 0 = Worst imaginable health state. Distribution of the observed responses (i.e., no problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and missing) of the 5 dimensions at each visit was summarized per arm. The denominator for the percentage calculation per group was based on the number of the EQ-5D-3L evaluable population at baseline. The distribution of change in responses (i.e., improved [by ≥1 level], no change, worsened [by ≥1 level], and missing) from baseline are reported. (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Cycle 6 Day 1

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
ImprovedNo ChangeWorsenedMissing
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care13.633.34.948.1
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care8.432.610.548.4

[back to top]

Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU): Total Number of Days Hospitalized Per Total Patient-Years

The number of days hospitalized per total patient years. HRU was defined as any consumption of healthcare resources directly or indirectly related to the treatment of the patient. (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: From date of randomization up to 28 days after the last dose of study drug; up to data cut off date of 25 January 2019; median duration of treatment to oral azacitaidine was 5.29 months and 5.36 months for placebo

InterventionDays Per Total Patient Years (Number)
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care41.44
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care40.53

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Improved, Worsened, or No Change in the European Quality of Life-Five Dimension-Three Level in the Anxiety/Depression Dimension Responses at Cycle 6

The EQ-5D-3L is a generic, self-administered questionnaire that consists of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, pain, usual activities, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels of severity corresponding to no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. It also includes a Visual Analog Scale that recorded the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, 0-100 scale, where 100 = Best imaginable health state and 0 = Worst imaginable health state. Distribution of the observed responses (i.e., no problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and missing) of the 5 dimensions at each visit was summarized per arm. The denominator for the percentage calculation per group was based on the number of the EQ-5D-3L evaluable population at baseline. The distribution of change in responses (i.e., improved [by ≥1 level], no change, worsened [by ≥1 level], and missing) from baseline are reported. (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Cycle 6 Day 1

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
ImprovedNo ChangeWorsenedMissing
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care4.935.811.148.1
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care7.437.96.348.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Improved, Worsened, or No Change in the European Quality of Life-Five Dimension-Three Level (EQ-5D-3L) Mobility Dimension Responses at Cycle 6

The EQ-5D-3L is a generic, self-administered questionnaire that consists of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, pain, usual activities, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels of severity corresponding to no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. It also includes a Visual Analog Scale that recorded the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, 0-100 scale, where 100 = Best imaginable health state and 0 = Worst imaginable health state. Distribution of the observed responses (i.e., no problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and missing) of the 5 dimensions at each visit was summarized per arm. The denominator for the percentage calculation per group was based on the number of the EQ-5D-3L evaluable population at baseline. The distribution of change in responses (i.e., improved [by ≥1 level], no change, worsened [by ≥1 level], and missing) from baseline are reported. (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Cycle 6 Day 1

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
ImprovedNo ChangeWorsenedMissing
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care8.635.87.448.1
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care8.433.79.548.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Responses to the Fact-Anemia Item GP-5

"The distribution (frequency and percentage) of the observed responses (i.e., Not at all (0), A little bit (1), Somewhat (2), Quite a bit (3), Very much (4), and missing) to Item GP-5 (I am bothered by side effects of treatment in the past seven days) of the FACT-An at each scheduled visit were summarized for each treatment group. The denominator for the percentage calculation per treatment group was based on the number of the FACT-An evaluable population at baseline. The distribution of change in responses (improved [i.e., change score from 1 to 4], no change [0], worsened by one level [-1], worsened by ≥2 levels [-2 to -4], and missing) from baseline at each post-baseline scheduled visit were summarized by treatment group." (NCT01566695)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Cycle 7 Day 1 (C7D1)

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
ImprovedNo ChangeWorsened by 1 LevelWorsened by 2 LevelsMissing
Oral Azacitidine and Best Supportive Care1.225.911.17.454.3
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care1.121.13.23.271.6

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUCt) of Azacitidine

Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable time point, calculated by the linear trapezoidal rule when concentrations are increasing and the logarithmic trapezoidal method when concentrations are decreasing. (NCT01599325)
Timeframe: PK blood samples collected at 0.25, 0.5, 1,2,3,4, 6 and 8 hours after azacitidine administration on Day 7

Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Azacitidine1161.9

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC∞) of Azacitidine

Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC∞) following multiple doses of Azacitidine on Day 7; if possible, the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity, calculated by the linear trapezoidal rule and extrapolated to infinity was calculated according to the following equation: AUC∞ = AUCt + (Ct/ λz ), where Ct is the last quantifiable concentration. No AUC extrapolation will be performed with unreliable λz. If % AUC extrapolated is ≥ 25%, AUC∞ will not be reported (NCT01599325)
Timeframe: PK blood samples collected at 0.25, 0.5, 1,2,3,4, 6 and 8 hours after azacitidine administration on Day 7

Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Azacitidine1172.6

[back to top]

Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F) of Azacitidine

Apparent volume of distribution, was calculated according to the equation: Vd/F = (CL/F)/λz (NCT01599325)
Timeframe: PK blood samples collected at 0.25, 0.5, 1,2,3,4, 6 and 8 hours after azacitidine administration on Day 7

InterventionLiters (Geometric Mean)
Azacitidine121.5

[back to top]

Apparent Total Plasma Clearance (CL/F) of Azacitidine

Apparent total plasma clearance (CL/F) of Azacitidine was calculated as Dose/AUC∞ (NCT01599325)
Timeframe: PK blood samples collected at 0.25, 0.5, 1,2,3,4, 6 and 8 hours after azacitidine administration on Day 7

InterventionLiters/hours (Geometric Mean)
Azacitidine107.2

[back to top]

The Number of Units of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions by Cycle

The number of units of RBC received 56 days prior to treatment, considered the baseline period (baseline period defined as the screening period before the date of the first dose of azacitidine; any laboratory and blood transfusion data reported on the day of the first dose of azacitidine was considered to be baseline data) and during study was standardized per 28 days and summarized by cycle for RBC. The formula for standardizing per 28 days was: [(# of transfusions in the measurement period / length of the measurement period (days)) x 28], where the measurement period was either baseline or the relevant cycle length. (NCT01599325)
Timeframe: Up to cycle 27; The on-treatment period was considered the period from the date of first dose to the last treatment study visit; Up to 29 January 2015; 894 days

InterventionUnits of RBC Transfusions (Mean)
Baseline N = 72Overall Post-Baseline Average N = 72Overall Change from Baseline N = 72Cycle 1 N = 72Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Cycle 5Cycle 6Cycle 7Cycle 8Cycle 9Cycle 10Cycle 11Cycle 12Cycle 13Cycle 14Cycle 15Cycle 16Cycle 17Cycle 18Cycle 19Cycle 20Cycle 21Cycle 22 NCycle 23Cycle 24Cycle 25Cycle 26Cycle 27
Azacitidine2.33.51.23.63.63.02.72.52.01.71.70.91.21.31.11.20.41.10.91.21.60.81.10.400.00.00.00.00.0

[back to top]

The Number of Platelet Transfusions by Cycle

The number of platelet transfusions received 56 days prior to treatment, considered the baseline period (baseline period defined as the screening period before the date of the first dose of azacitidine; any laboratory and blood transfusion data reported on the day of the first dose of azacitidine was considered to be baseline data) and during study was standardized per 28 days and summarized by cycle for platelets. The formula for standardizing per 28 days was: [(# of transfusions in the measurement period / length of the measurement period (days)) x 28], where the measurement period was either baseline or the relevant cycle length. (NCT01599325)
Timeframe: Up to cycle 27; The on-treatment period was considered the period from the date of first dose to the last treatment study visit; Up to 29 January 2015; 894 days

InterventionPlatelet transfusions (Mean)
Baseline N = 72Overall Post-Baseline Average N = 72Overall Change from Baseline N = 72Cycle 1 N = 72Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Cycle 5Cycle 6Cycle 7Cycle 8Cycle 9Cycle 10Cycle 11Cycle 12Cycle 13Cycle 14Cycle 15Cycle 16Cycle 17Cycle 18Cycle 19Cycle 20Cycle 21Cycle 22Cycle 23Cycle 24Cycle 25Cycle 26Cycle 27
Azacitidine0.81.60.81.81.31.21.30.90.70.80.80.80.80.50.30.30.10.30.30.30.60.30.20.00.00.00.00.00.00.0

[back to top]

The Number of Units of Platelet Transfusions by Cycle

The number of units of platelet transfusions received 56 days prior to treatment, considered the baseline period, (baseline period defined as the screening period before the date of the first dose of azacitidine; any laboratory and blood transfusion data reported on the day of the first dose of azacitidine was considered to be baseline data) and during study was standardized per 28 days and summarized by cycle for platelets. The formula for standardizing per 28 days was: [(# of transfusions in the measurement period / length of the measurement period (days)) x 28], where the measurement period was either baseline or the relevant cycle length. (NCT01599325)
Timeframe: Up to cycle 27; The on-treatment period was considered the period from the date of first dose to the last treatment study visit; Up to 29 January 2015; 894 days

InterventionUnits of platelet transfusions (Mean)
Baseline N = 72Overall Post-Baseline Average N = 72Overall Change from Baseline N = 72Cycle 1 N = 72Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Cycle 5Cycle 6Cycle 7Cycle 8Cycle 9Cycle 10Cycle 11Cycle 12Cycle 13Cycle 14Cycle 15Cycle 16Cycle 17Cycle 18Cycle 19Cycle 20Cycle 21Cycle 22Cycle 23Cycle 24Cycle 25Cycle 26Cycle 27
Azacitidine1.94.72.85.22.43.32.72.51.51.01.10.80.80.50.30.30.10.30.30.30.60.30.20.00.00.00.00.00.00.0

[back to top]

The Number of RBC Transfusions by Cycle

The number of RBC transfusions received 56 days prior to treatment, considered the baseline period (baseline period defined as the screening period before the date of the first dose of azacitidine; any laboratory and blood transfusion data reported on the day of the first dose of azacitidine was considered to be baseline data) and during study was standardized per 28 days and summarized by cycle for platelets. The formula for standardizing per 28 days was: [(# of transfusions in the measurement period / length of the measurement period (days)) x 28], where the measurement period was either baseline or the relevant cycle length. (NCT01599325)
Timeframe: Up to cycle 27; The on-treatment period was considered the period from the date of first dose to the last treatment study visit; Up to 29 January 2015; 894 days

InterventionRBC Transfusions (Mean)
Baseline N = 72Overall Post-Baseline Average N = 72Overall Change from Baseline N = 72Cycle 1 N = 72Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Cycle 5Cycle 6Cycle 7Cycle 8Cycle 9Cycle 10Cycle 11Cycle 12Cycle 13Cycle 14Cycle 15Cycle 16Cycle 17Cycle 18Cycle 19Cycle 20Cycle 21Cycle 22Cycle 23Cycle 24Cycle 25Cycle 26Cycle 27
Azacitidine1.11.60.51.71.71.41.21.10.90.80.80.40.50.50.40.50.20.40.40.30.70.40.60.20.00.00.00.00.00.0

[back to top]

The Number of Infections (Post-baseline Average) Requiring Intravenous (IV) Antibiotics, Anti-fungals, or Antivirals by Cycle

The on-treatment adverse event of infection requiring IV antibiotics, antifungals, or antivirals per 28 days/cycle. The overall post-baseline average is the average of number of infections requiring IV antibiotics or IV antiviral per 28 days/cycle. (NCT01599325)
Timeframe: Up to cycle 27; The on-treatment period was considered the period from the date of first dose to the last treatment study visit; Up to 29 January 2015; 894 days

InterventionInfections (Mean)
Baseline N = 72Overall Post Baseline Average N = 72Overall Change from Baseline N =72Cycle 1 N = 72Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Cycle 5Cycle 6Cycle 7Cycle 8Cycle 9Cycle 10Cycle 11Cycle12Cycle 13Cycle 14 15Cycle 15Cycle 16Cycle 17Cycle 18Cycle 19Cycle 20Cycle 21Cycle 22Cycle 23Cycle 24Cycle 25Cycle 26 NCycle 27
Azacitidine0.00.60.50.60.50.40.50.40.20.30.20.10.20.10.10.10.10.30.30.40.40.20.00.00.91.00.00.00.00.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Hematologic Response Using IWG Criteria for MDS and Assessed by the Investigator

Hematologic Response is defined by those participants who experienced a Complete Response, Partial Response and Stable Disease (SD) based on IWG 2000 response criteria for MDS. CR = repeat bone marrow (BM) shows <5% myeloblasts, and peripheral blood values lasting ≥ 2 months of hemoglobin (hgb) (>110 g/L), neutrophils (≥1.5x10^9/L), platelets (≥100x10^9/L), blasts (0%) and no dysplasia • PR = same as CR for peripheral blood: BM shows blasts decrease by ≥ 50% or a less advanced FAB classification from pretreatment • Stable disease (SD): failure to achieve a PR, no evidence of progression for at least 2 months. • Failure: death during treatment or disease progression • Relapse After CR or PR: return to pretreatment BM blast percent or decrement of ≥ 50% from remission/response levels in granulocytes or platelets; or reduction in hgb by ≥20 g/L or transfusion dependence • Disease Progression: change in blast levels • Disease Transformation to Acute Myelogenous Leukemia. (NCT01599325)
Timeframe: Response initially assessed at end of cycle 6, then every 4 cycles; Up to 29 January 2015; 894 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Overall CR+PROverall CR+PR+SDCRPR
Azacitidine12.570.86.95.6

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Parent Phase

A treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) was defined as AEs with an onset date on or after the date of first dose and within 28 days after the date of the last dose. Any AE that occurred beyond this timeframe and was assessed by the investigator as possibly related to study drug was considered treatment-emergent. The intensity and severity of AEs was assessed by the investigator according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (CTCAE) Version 4.0. For any AEs not listed in the CTCAE grading system, the intensities of these events was assessed by the Investigator using the 5-point scale: Grade 1 = Mild, Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Life threatening, Grade 5 = Death. An SAE is any AE occurring that results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, and constitutes an important medical event. (NCT01599325)
Timeframe: Up to 29 January 2015; from the first dose of study drug to 28 days after the date of the last dose of study drug (maximum time on study was 244 days)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
≥ 1 TEAE≥ 1 Grade 3 or 4 TEAE≥ 1 TEAE related to study drug≥ 1 Grade 3 or 4 TEAE related to study drug≥ 1 serious TEAE≥ 1 Grade 3 or 4 serious TEAE≥ 1 serious TEAE related to study drug≥ 1 TEAE leading to discontinuation of study drug≥ 1 TEAE leading to dose reduction of study drug≥1 TEAE leading to dose interruption of study drug≥1 TEAE leading to dose reduction/interruption≥1 TEAE with outcome of death
Azacitidine727068593833281419495011

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Extension Phase

A treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) was defined as AEs with an onset date on or after the date of first dose and within 28 days after the date of the last dose. Any AE that occurred beyond this timeframe and was assessed by the investigator as possibly related to study drug was considered treatment-emergent. The intensity and severity of AEs was assessed by the investigator according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (CTCAE) Version 4.0. For any AEs not listed in the CTCAE grading system, the intensities of these events was assessed by the Investigator using the 5-point scale: Grade 1 = Mild, Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Life threatening, Grade 5 = Death. An SAE is any AE occurring that results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, and constitutes an important medical event. (NCT01599325)
Timeframe: Up to final data cut off date of 25 April 2018; from the first dose of study drug extesnion of 29 December 2014 to 28 days after the date of the last dose of study drug; median duration of any dose of study drug was 169 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
≥ 1 TEAE≥ 1 TEAE related to study drug≥ 1 Grade 3 or 4 TEAE≥ 1 Grade 3 or 4 TEAE related to study drug≥ 1 serious TEAE≥ 1 serious TEAE related to study drug≥ 1 Grade 3 or 4 serious TEAE≥1 TEAE leading to dose interruption of study drug≥1 TEAE leading to dose reduction/interruption
Azacitidine14813651544

[back to top]

Kaplan Meier Estimates for Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival is defined as time to death from any cause, is calculated using date of first dose and date of death, or date of last follow-up for censored participants. Those, who die regardless of the cause of death, will be considered to have an event. (NCT01599325)
Timeframe: Until the end of the survival follow-up period; Up to data cut-off of 29 January 2015; 894 days

Interventionmonths (Number)
Median OS25th percentile OS75th Percentile OS
Azacitidine22.08.5NA

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Azacitidine

Time to maximum observed plasma concentration obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time data. (NCT01599325)
Timeframe: PK blood samples collected at 0.25, 0.5, 1,2,3,4, 6 and 8 hours after azacitidine administration on Day 7

Interventionhours (Median)
Azacitidine0.25

[back to top]

Terminal Phase of Half-life (T1/2) of Azacitidine

The apparent terminal half-life was calculated according to the following equation t½ = 0.693/λz. (NCT01599325)
Timeframe: PK blood samples collected at 0.25, 0.5, 1,2,3,4, 6 and 8 hours after azacitidine administration on Day 7

Interventionhours (Geometric Mean)
Azacitidine0.8

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Azacitidine

The observed maximum plasma concentration obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time data. (NCT01599325)
Timeframe: PK blood samples collected at 0.25, 0.5, 1,2,3,4, 6 and 8 hours after azacitidine administration on Day 7

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Azacitidine1264.6

[back to top]

Duration of Thrombocytopenia Defined as Platelet Count Less Than 100,000

(NCT01607645)
Timeframe: Assessed for up to 5 years

Interventiondays (Mean)
Arm I (Decitabine Day -4 to Day 0), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)51

[back to top]

Resistant Disease Defined as Patient Survives at Least 14 Days After Completion of the Last Dose of Induction or Re-induction But Has Persistent Leukemia in Peripheral Blood (PB) or BM

(NCT01607645)
Timeframe: Assessed for up to 90 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Decitabine Day -4 to Day 0), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)1
Arm II (Decitabine (Day -9 to Day -5), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)3

[back to top]

TRM With Each Course of Decitabine-priming, Idarubicin, and Cytarabine

(NCT01607645)
Timeframe: Assessed for up to Day 30

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Decitabine Day -4 to Day 0), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)0
Arm II (Decitabine (Day -9 to Day -5), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)0

[back to top]

Frequency and Severity of Grade 3, 4, and 5 Toxicities With Each Course of Decitabine-priming, Idarubicin, and Cytarabine According to NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version (CTCAE) 4.0

(NCT01607645)
Timeframe: Assessed for up to 3 months after completion study treatment

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
CYCLE 1 : Infection Grade 3CYCLE 1 : Infection Grade 4CYCLE 1 : Hepatobiliary Grade 3CYCLE 1 : Blood and Lymphatic Grade 3CYCLE 1 : Gastrointenstinal Grade 3CYCLE 2 : Infection Grade 3CYCLE 2 : Infection Grade 4CYCLE 2 : Hepatobiliary Grade 3CYCLE 2 : Blood and Lymphatic Grade 3CYCLE 2 : Gastrointenstinal Grade 3
Arm I (Decitabine Day -4 to Day 0), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)2003000011
Arm II (Decitabine (Day -9 to Day -5), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)0111000000

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Achieved Morphologic CR

Morphologic complete remission (CR): Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC)≥1,000/uL, platelet count ≥100,000/uL, <5% Bone Marrow (BM) blasts, no Auer rods (cytoplasmic inclusions which result from an abnormal fusion of the primary (azurophilic) granules), no morphologic dysplasia, and no evidence of extramedullary disease (NCT01607645)
Timeframe: Participants were monitored up until the point when they went off study following completion of the treatment (3 months)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
CRCRi-MRD (Minimal Residual Disease)Refractory
Arm I (Decitabine Day -4 to Day 0), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)211
Arm II (Decitabine (Day -9 to Day -5), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)003

[back to top]

Severe Prolonged Aplasia

(NCT01607645)
Timeframe: Assessed for up to 45 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Decitabine Day -4 to Day 0), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)0
Arm II (Decitabine (Day -9 to Day -5), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)0

[back to top]

CRMRD- Defined as Morphologic CR Without Evidence of Minimal Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry, Cytogenetics, or Other Known Molecular Biomarkers

(NCT01607645)
Timeframe: Assessed for up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Decitabine Day -4 to Day 0), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)2
Arm II (Decitabine (Day -9 to Day -5), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)0

[back to top]

Duration of Moderate Neutropenia Defined as an ANC Less Than 1000

(NCT01607645)
Timeframe: Assessed for up to 5 years

Interventiondays (Mean)
Arm I (Decitabine Day -4 to Day 0), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)67

[back to top]

Cytogenetic Response Defined as no Detectable Cytogenetic Abnormality in a Subsequent BM Specimen After Induction or Re-induction

(NCT01607645)
Timeframe: Assessed for up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Decitabine Day -4 to Day 0), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)3
Arm II (Decitabine (Day -9 to Day -5), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)0

[back to top]

Duration of Severe Neutropenia Defined as an ANC Less Than 500

(NCT01607645)
Timeframe: Assessed for up to 5 years

Interventiondays (Mean)
Arm I (Decitabine Day -4 to Day 0), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)65

[back to top]

CRi Defined as Meeting All Criteria for a Morphologic CR But ANC Remains Less Than 1,000/μL and/or Platelet Count Less Than 100,000/μL

(NCT01607645)
Timeframe: Assessed for up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Decitabine Day -4 to Day 0), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)0
Arm II (Decitabine (Day -9 to Day -5), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)0

[back to top]

CRMRD+ Defined as a Morphologic CR But With Minimal Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry, Cytogenetics, or Other Known Molecular Biomarkers

(NCT01607645)
Timeframe: Assessed for up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Decitabine Day -4 to Day 0), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)0
Arm II (Decitabine (Day -9 to Day -5), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)0

[back to top]

CRiMRD+ Defined as Meeting All Criteria for a CRi But With Evidence of Minimal Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry, Cytogenetics, or Other Known Molecular Biomarkers

(NCT01607645)
Timeframe: Assessed for up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Decitabine Day -4 to Day 0), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)1
Arm II (Decitabine (Day -9 to Day -5), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)0

[back to top]

Two-year Relapse Free Survival of Patients

To evaluate the two-year relapse-free survival (RFS) of patients with poor-risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or Myelodysplasia (MDS), who receive maintenance treatment with 5-Azacytidine (5AC) in combination with sargramostim (GM-CSF) during remission, following definitive therapy with either a stem cell transplant (SCT) or cytarabine-based consolidation chemotherapy. (NCT01700673)
Timeframe: 2 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Non-myeloablative BMT8
Myeloablative BMT1
Standard Consolidation1

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Percentage of participants with overall survival at 2 years. (NCT01700673)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Non-myeloablative6
Myeloablative BMT1
Standard Consolidation1

[back to top]

One-year RFS

We will report the number of participants with one year RFS (NCT01700673)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Non-myeloablative BMT12
Myeloablative BMT1
Standard Consolidation1

[back to top]

Hematologic Toxicity as Determined by Anemia

Percentage of patients with anemia, the most commonly reported hematologic toxicity, after receiving the combination of Azacitidine and sargramostim (NCT01700673)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Non-myeloablative BMT8
Myeloablative BMT1
Standard Consolidation0

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of Grade III-IV Acute GVHD

Determined by the standard bone marrow transplant (BMT) Clinical Trials Network criteria (BMTCTN). Will be analyzed using KM method, a Graft versus Host Disease (GVHD) grade III-IV will be obtained from the KM estimates along with 95% confidence intervals. (NCT01707004)
Timeframe: Day 100

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Decitabine + Bone Marrow Transplant27.8

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

(NCT01707004)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventiondays (Median)
Decitabine + Bone Marrow Transplant141

[back to top]

Time to Neutrophil Recovery

Defined as achieving an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than or equal to 500/ul for three consecutive measurements on different days. Will be summarized with mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range, and the change will be tested using a one-sample paired t-test at a two-tailed significance level of 0.05. (NCT01707004)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventiondays (Mean)
Decitabine + Bone Marrow Transplant16

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Platelet Recovery by Day 30

Platelet recovery is defined as the first day of a platelet count greater than 20,000/mm^3 with no platelet transfusions. Will be summarized with mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range, and the change will be tested using a one-sample paired t-test at a two-tailed significance level of 0.05. (NCT01707004)
Timeframe: Up to day 30

Interventionpercentage with plt engraftment, day 30 (Number)
Decitabine + Bone Marrow Transplant58

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Primary Graft Failure

Defined as less than 5% donor chimerism in the cluster of differentiation (CD)3 and CD33 selected cell populations at any time after transplantation. Will be analyzed using KM method. (NCT01707004)
Timeframe: Day 30

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Decitabine + Bone Marrow Transplant0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Complete Remission After Transplantation

(NCT01707004)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Decitabine + Bone Marrow Transplant14

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD According to BMTCTN

Will be summarized with a proportion and a 95% confidence interval. (NCT01707004)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionpercentage (Number)
Decitabine + Bone Marrow Transplant40.7

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Will be analyzed using Kaplan-Meier (KM) method, and OS will be obtained from the KM estimates along with 95% confidence intervals. (NCT01707004)
Timeframe: Day 100

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Decitabine + Bone Marrow Transplant64.7

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Became Transfusion Independent

Participants who were transfusion dependent at baseline prior to starting therapy on the Decitabine or Azacitidine arm will be analyzed for transfusion independence. Transfusion independence defined as being transfusion-free for ≥8 consecutive weeks between the first dose and study treatment discontinuation. (NCT01720225)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Decitabine12
Azacitidine3

[back to top]

Participants With a Response

Overall Response = complete remission (CR) + partial remission (PR) + marrow CR (mCR) + hematologic improvement (HI). CR is normalization of peripheral blood and bone marrow with <5% bone marrow blasts, a peripheral blood granulocyte count > (1.0 x 10^9/L, and platelet count > 100 x 10^9/L). PR is same as CR except for the presence of 6-15% marrow blasts, or 50% reduction if <15% at start of treatment. Marrow CR is blasts /=50% from baseline. HI is platelets increase by 50% and to above 30 x 10^9/L untransfused (if lower than that pre-therapy; or hemoglobin increase by 2 g/dl; or transfusion independent; or splenomegaly reduction by > 50%; or monocytosis reduction by > 50% if pretreatment > 5 X1 0^9/L. (NCT01720225)
Timeframe: 56 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Decitabine49
Azacitidine19

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Change in baseline to end of study. To be assessed by standard criteria based on bone marrow examination (NCT01743859)
Timeframe: Depending on outcomes, will initiate this assessment after 2 years and will continue until completion of study, estimated at 4 years

Interventiondays (Median)
Azacitidine + Lenalidomide + Off Therapy112

[back to top]

Determine Biomarkers That Predict Response/Toxicity

Change in baseline to end of study. Planned assessments of methylation changes and other biomarkers. Computational biology modeling used to identify biomarkers and predict response. (NCT01743859)
Timeframe: Three years after initiating study

Interventionpatients w/response predictor mutations (Number)
Azacitidine + Lenalidomide + Off Therapy9

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

Change in baseline to end of study. To be assessed by standard criteria based on bone marrow examination (NCT01743859)
Timeframe: Planned assessment after enrollment of all 37 patients (estimated 3-4 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Azacitidine + Lenalidomide + Off Therapy52

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission or Complete Remission With Incomplete Recovery Blood Counts

Change in baseline to end of study. To be assessed by standard criteria based on bone marrow examination. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR (NCT01743859)
Timeframe: Interim assessment after 18 patients (estimated 2 years) and full assessment after 37 patients (estimated 3-4 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Azacitidine + Lenalidomide + Off Therapy11

[back to top]

Response or Remission Duration

Change in baseline to end of study. To be assessed by standard criteria based on bone marrow examination (NCT01743859)
Timeframe: Depending on outcomes, will initiate this assessment after 2 years and will continue until completion of study, estimated at 4 years

Interventiondays (Median)
Azacitidine + Lenalidomide + Off Therapy125

[back to top] [back to top]

Overall Survival

Change in baseline to end of study (NCT01743859)
Timeframe: Depending on outcomes, will begin assessment at 2 years and will continue until completion of study, estimated to be at four years

Interventiondays (Median)
Azacitidine + Lenalidomide + Off Therapy166

[back to top]

Overall Survival as Measured by Number of Participants Alive at 1 Year After Transplant

Date of transplant to the date of death from any cause. (NCT01747499)
Timeframe: One year after transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort 13
Cohort 22
Cohort 32
Cohort 44
Phase II Cohort28

[back to top]

Rate of Chronic GvHD

(NCT01747499)
Timeframe: One year after transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort 13
Cohort 22
Cohort 32
Cohort 43
Phase II Cohort27

[back to top]

Phase II: Number of Participants With Grades II-IV Acute GvHD

GVHD rate and severity will be assessed based on modified Glucksberg criteria. Grade II-IV and III-IV aGVHD in first 180 days after transplant will be assessed. (NCT01747499)
Timeframe: Day +180

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase II Cohort16

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Relapsed Within the First Year of Transplant

Recurrence of the original malignant disease after transplantation. The time to relapse is the time to the first observation of hematologic, radiographic, or cytogenetic changes, which result in characterization as relapse. (NCT01747499)
Timeframe: Within the first year of transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort 11
Cohort 20
Cohort 31
Cohort 41
Phase II Cohort4

[back to top]

Phase I: to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Azacitidine in Patients Undergoing Matched (8 Out of 8) Unrelated Donor Transplant for Any Hematological Malignancy in Remission or With Stable Disease.

The MTD is defined as the dose level immediately below the dose level at which patients of a cohort (of 2 to 6 patients) experience dose-limiting toxicity. (NCT01747499)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
Phase I45

[back to top] [back to top]

Rate of Grades III-IV aGVHD at Day +180.

GVHD rate and severity will be assessed based on modified Glucksberg criteria. (NCT01747499)
Timeframe: Day +180

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort 10
Cohort 20
Cohort 30
Cohort 40
Phase II Cohort9

[back to top]

Response Rate

"All eligible patients will be treated with Azacitidine and oral vorinostat for 6 cycles of 28 days.~The response rate (CR, PR, HI or marrow CR) will be evaluated after six cycles, according to IWG 2006.~In patients still responding after six cycles, the drugs will continue to be supplied, and follow up until death or unacceptable tolerance will be continued in all patients.~Complete Response (CR): Bone marrow: less than 5% myeloblasts with Peripheral blood: HI responses).~Partial remission (RP): Bone marrow blasts decreased by at least 50% but still more than 5% with Peripheral blood: HI responses).~Marrow CR:Bone marrow: maximum of 5% myeloblasts and decrease by at least 50% over pretreatment~HI (hematologic improvement)~Erythroid response: Hgb increase at least by 1.5 g/dL~Platelet response: Increase from less than 20x109/L to more than 20x109/L and by at least 100%~Neutrophil response: At least 100% increase and an absolute increase of at least 0.5x109/L" (NCT01748240)
Timeframe: 6 month

Interventionpercentage of response (Number)
Azacitidine and Oral Vorinostat5

[back to top]

Time to Definitive Clinically Meaningful Deterioration for ≥ 2 Consecutive Visits as Measured Using the EQ-5D HRQoL Scale

Clinically meaningful deterioration was defined at least 0.10 point of deterioration from baseline for at least 2 consecutive visits for the EQ-5D Health Utility Index. The EQ-5D-3L is a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 5 questions, pertaining to specific health dimensions (ie, mobility, self-care, pain, usual activities, and anxiety/depression) and a health status scale. Each question has 3 levels of severity, corresponding to no problems, moderate problems and severe problems. Canadian population sample weights were used to derive health utility scores. A higher utility score represents a better health state. A clinically meaningful improvement or worsening was defined as at least 0.08 points of improvement or 0.10 points of worsening from baseline, respectively, for the EQ-5D-3L Health Utility Index. The EQ-5D-3L is scored using the UK index ranges from -0.594 to 1, where 0 equates to death and 1 equates to full health; -0.594 is considered 'worse than death'. (NCT01757535)
Timeframe: From day 1 (randomization) up to data cut off date of 15 July 2019; approximately 74 months

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Oral Azacitidine Plus Best Supportive CareNA
Placebo Plus Best Supportive CareNA

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Time to Discontinuation From Treatment

Time to discontinuation from treatment was assessed and defined as the interval from the date of randomization to the date of discontinuation from study drug. Participants who were receiving treatment at the time of study closure were censored at the date of last visit. Estimates of relapse rate were based on the cumulative incidence function from a competing risk analysis with death as a competing risk for relapse from CR/ CRi. (NCT01757535)
Timeframe: From day 1 (randomization) up to data cut off date of 15 July 2019; approximately 74 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Oral Azacitidine Plus Best Supportive Care11.4
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care6.1

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Time to Relapse

"Time to relapse was defined as the interval (in months) from the date of randomization to the date of documented relapse. Estimates of relapse rate were based on the cumulative incidence function from a competing risk analysis with death as a competing risk for relapse from complete remission (CR)/ complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi).~Documented relapse was defined as, the earliest date of the following:~≥ 5% bone marrow blasts (myeloblasts) from Central Pathology report, or~appearance of > 0% blasts in the peripheral blood with a later bone marrow confirmation (bone marrow blast [myeloblasts] ≥ 5%) within 100 days, or~at least 2 peripheral blasts ≥ 5% within 30 days." (NCT01757535)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) to the date of the data cut off date of 15 July 2019; approximately 74 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Oral Azacitidine Plus Best Supportive Care10.2
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care4.9

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Relapse Free Survival (RFS)

"RFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of documented relapse or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants who were still alive without documented relapse, or who were lost to follow-up or withdrew consent without documented relapse, were censored at the date of their last bone marrow assessment, prior to receiving any other therapy for AML.~Documented relapse was defined as the earliest date of the following:~≥ 5% bone marrow blasts (myeloblasts) from Central Pathology report, or~appearance of > 0% blasts in the peripheral blood with a later bone marrow confirmation (bone marrow blast [myeloblasts] ≥ 5%) within 100 days, or~at least 2 peripheral blasts ≥ 5% within 30 days." (NCT01757535)
Timeframe: From day 1 (randomization) up to data cut off date of 15 July 2019; approximately 74 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Oral Azacitidine Plus Best Supportive Care10.2
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care4.8

[back to top]

Time to Definitive Clinically Meaningful Deterioration for ≥ 2 Consecutive Visits as Measured Using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT-Fatigue Scale V 4.0)

Clinically meaningful deterioration was defined as at least 3 points of deterioration from baseline for at least 2 consecutive visits for the FACIT--Fatigue. The FACIT-Fatigue Scale V 4.0) is a subscale of the FACIT-F and has been validated in the oncology setting. The FACIT-Fatigue Scale is a short, 13-item, self-administered tool that measures the level of fatigue in an individual during usually daily activities over the past week. The level of fatigue is measured on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = not at all to 4 = very much. The scores that range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating less fatigue. If there were missing items, but the participant answered at least 50% of the items, subscores were prorated. (NCT01757535)
Timeframe: From day 1 (randomization) up to data cut off date of 15 July 2019; approximately 74 months

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Oral Azacitidine Plus Best Supportive Care41.1
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care49.4

[back to top]

Mean Change in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT-Fatigue Scale V 4.0) Score From Baseline

The functional assessment of chronic illness therapy (FACIT-Fatigue Scale V 4.0) is a subscale of the FACIT-F and has been validated in the oncology setting. The FACIT-Fatigue Scale is a short, 13-item, self-administered tool that measures the level of fatigue in an individual during usually daily activities over the past week. The level of fatigue is measured on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = not at all; 4 = very much. The scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating less fatigue. If there were missing items, but the participant answered at least 50% of the items, then subscores were prorated. (NCT01757535)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 2, Day 1 (C2D1), C3D1, C4D1, C5D1, C6D1, C7D1, C8D1, C9D1C3, C10D1, C11D1, C12D1, C13D1, C14D1, C15D1, C15D1, C16D1, C17D1, C18D1, C19D1, C20D1, C21D1, C22D1, C23D1, C24D1, C25D1 and continued on day 1 at each cycle through C33D1

,
InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Change from Baseline (CFB) at Cycle 2 Day 1CFB at C3 D1CFB at C4 D1CFB at C5 D1CFB at C6 D1CFB at C7 D1CFB at C8 D1CFB at C9 D1CFB at C10 D1CFB at C11 D1CFB at C12 D1CFB at C13 D1CFB at C14 D1CFB at C15 D1CFB at C16 D1CFB at C17 D1CFB at C18 D1CFB at C19 D1CFB at C20 D1CFB at C21 D1CFB at C22 D1CFB at C23 D1CFB at C24 D1CFB at C25 D1CFB at C26 D1CFB at C27 D1CFB at C28 D1CFB at C29 D1CFB at C30 D1CFB at C31 D1CFB at C32 D1CFB at C33 D1
Oral Azacitidine Plus Best Supportive Care0.60.50.80.90.70.40.40.31.01.00.91.31.11.61.91.91.11.71.31.10.61.00.60.50.80.91.0-0.31.30.50.3-0.2
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care0.31.61.31.61.11.81.50.51.61.51.62.91.12.61.52.42.01.83.62.53.23.22.61.32.52.61.62.73.12.92.82.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

"TEAEs include AEs that started between first dose date and 28 days after the last dose of study drug.~A serious adverse event (SAE) is:~Death~Life-threatening event~Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization~Persistent or significant disability or incapacity~Congenital anomaly or birth defect~Other important medical event The severity of AEs were assessed by the investigator according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0: Grade 1 (Mild): asymptomatic/mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2 (Moderate): minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care Grade 4: Life-threatening; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5: Death due to AE." (NCT01757535)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) to the data cut off date of 15 July 2019; the median treatment duration was 11.6 months (range: 0.5 to 74.3 months) for the oral aza arm and 5.7 months (range: 0.7 to 68.5 months) for the placebo arm.

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
≥ 1 TEAE≥ 1 TEAE Related to Study Treatment≥ 1 Serious TEAE≥ 1 Treatment Related Serious TEAE≥ 1 Grade 3/4 TEAE≥ 1 Treatment Related Grade 3/4 TEAE≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Death≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction (Red)≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Dose Interruption≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Dose Red and Interruption≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation
Oral Azacitidine Plus Best Supportive Care23121279221691139371022431
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care225120605147544640310

[back to top]

Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU): Number of Days Hospitalized Per Person-Year

HRU is defined as any consumption of healthcare resources directly or indirectly related to the treatment of the patient. HRU is a key component to understand treatment costs and budget impact of new treatments from a provider perspective. (NCT01757535)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) to the date of the data cut off date of 15 July 2019; approximately 74 months

InterventionDays per person-years (Number)
Oral Azacitidine Plus Best Supportive Care7.89
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care13.36

[back to top]

Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU): Rate of Hospital Events Per Person Year

HRU is defined as any consumption of healthcare resources directly or indirectly related to the treatment of the patient. HRU is a key component to understand treatment costs and budget impact of new treatments from a provider perspective. (NCT01757535)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) to the date of the data cut off date of 15 July 2019; approximately 74 months

InterventionHospitalizations per person-years (Number)
Oral Azacitidine Plus Best Supportive Care0.48
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care0.64

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier (K-M) Estimate for Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival was defined as time from randomization to death from any cause; participants surviving at the end of the follow-up period, or who withdraw consent, or who were lost to follow up were censored at the date last known alive. (NCT01757535)
Timeframe: Day 1 (randomization) up to data cut off date of 15 July 2019; median follow-up for OS estimated by the reverse K-M method was 41.2 months for all participants.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Oral Azacitidine Plus Best Supportive Care24.7
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care14.8

[back to top]

Mean Change in the European Quality of Life-Five Dimensions-Three Levels (EQ-5D-3L) Score From Baseline

The EQ-5D-3L is a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 5 questions, pertaining to specific health dimensions (ie, mobility, self-care, pain, usual activities, and anxiety/depression) and a health status scale. Each question has 3 levels of severity, corresponding to no problems, moderate problems and severe problems. Canadian population sample weights were used to derive health utility scores. A higher utility score represents a better health state. A clinically meaningful improvement or worsening was defined as at least 0.08 points of improvement or 0.10 points of worsening from baseline, respectively, for the EQ-5D-3L Health Utility Index. The instrument is scored using the United Kingdom (UK) index ranges from -0.594 to 1, where 0 equates to death and 1 equates to full health; -0.594 is considered 'worse than death'. (NCT01757535)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 2, Day 1 (C2D1), C3D1, C4D1, C5D1, C6D1, C7D1, C8D1, C9D1C3, C10D1, C11D1, C12D1, C13D1, C14D1, C15D1, C15D1, C16D1, C17D1, C18D1, C19D1, C20D1, C21D1, C22D1, C23D1, C24D1, C25D1 and continued on day 1 at each cycle through C33D1

,
InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Change from Baseline (CFB) at Cycle 2 Day 1CFB at C3 D1CFB at C4 D1CFB at C5 D1CFB at C6 D1CFB at C7 D1CFB at C8 D1CFB at C9 D1CFB at C10 D1CFB at C11 D1CFB at C12 D1CFB at C13 D1CFB at C14 D1CFB at C15 D1CFB at C16 D1CFB at C17 D1CFB at C18 D1CFB at C19 D1CFB at C20 D1CFB at C21 D1CFB at C22 D1CFB at C23 D1CFB at C24 D1CFB at C25 D1CFB at C26 D1CFB at C27 D1CFB at C28 D1CFB at C29 D1CFB at C30 D1CFB at C31 D1CFB at C32 D1CFB at C33 D1
Oral Azacitidine Plus Best Supportive Care0.00170.00420.00850.00490.00960.0115-0.0011-0.00550.01120.01980.00800.02100.01270.01990.01610.01090.01620.01250.00880.00870.00860.00260.01040.0039-0.00170.0026-0.00130.00430.01350.0052-0.00020.0082
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care0.01070.01220.02300.01640.01480.02170.02590.02450.01030.03640.02760.03860.01350.03070.04150.04940.03590.04360.05050.05660.05480.05560.05060.04080.04630.04590.04190.02990.04610.03990.02230.0243

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing a Clinically Meaningful Change (Improvement, No Change and Deterioration) in the FACIT-Fatigue Scale From Baseline

A clinically meaningful improvement or worsening was defined as at least 3 points of improvement or worsening from baseline, respectively, for FACIT-Fatigue. The functional assessment of chronic illness therapy (FACIT-Fatigue Scale V 4.0) is a subscale of the FACIT-F and has been validated in the oncology setting. The FACIT-Fatigue Scale is a short, 13-item, self-administered tool that measures the level of fatigue in an individual during usually daily activities over the past week. The level of fatigue is measured on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = not at all; 4 = very much. The scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating less fatigue. If there were missing items, but the participant answered at least 50% of the items, then subscores were prorated. (NCT01757535)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 2, Day 1 (C2D1), C3D1, C4D1, C5D1, C6D1, C7D1, C8D1, C9D1C3, C10D1, C11D1, C12D1, C13D1, C14D1, C15D1, C15D1, C16D1, C17D1, C18D1, C19D1, C20D1, C21D1, C22D1, C23D1, C24D1, C25D1 and continued on day 1 at each cycle through C33D1

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2, D1) ImprovementC2, D1 No ChangeC2, D1 WorseningC3, D1 ImprovementC3, D1 No ChangeC3, D1 WorseningC4, D1 ImprovementC4, D1 No ChangeC4, D1 WorseningC5, D1 ImprovementC5, D1 No ChangeC5, D1 WorseningC6, D1 ImprovementC6, D1 No ChangeC6, D1 WorseningC7, D1 ImprovementC7, D1 No ChangeC7, D1 WorseningC8, D1 ImprovementC8, D1 No ChangeC8, D1 WorseningC9, D1 ImprovementC9, D1 No ChangeC9, D1 WorseningC10, D1 ImprovementC10, D1 No ChangeC10, D1 WorseningC11, D1 ImprovementC11, D1 No ChangeC11, D1 WorseningC12, D1 ImprovementC12, D1 No changeC12, D1 WorseningC13, D1 ImprovementC13, D1 No ChangeC13, D1 WorseningC14, D1 ImprovementC14, D1 No ChangeC14, D1 WorseningC15 D1 ImprovementC15, D1 No ChangeC15, D1 WorseningC16 D1 ImprovementC16, D1 No ChangeC16, D1 WorseningC17 D1 ImprovementC17, D1 No ChangeC17, D1 WorseningC18 D1 ImprovementC18, D1 No ChangeC18, D1 WorseningC19 D1 ImprovementC19, D1 No ChangeC19, D1 WorseningC20 D1 ImprovementC20, D1 No ChangeC20, D1 WorseningC21 D1 ImprovementC21, D1 No ChangeC21, D1 WorseningC22 D1 ImprovementC22, D1 No ChangeC22, D1 WorseningC23 D1 ImprovementC23, D1 No ChangeC23, D1 WorseningC24 D1 ImprovementC24, D1 No ChangeC24, D1 WorseningC25 D1 ImprovementC25, D1 No ChangeC25, D1 WorseningC26 D1 ImprovementC26, D1 No ChangeC26, D1 WorseningC27 D1 ImprovementC27, D1 No ChangeC27, D1 WorseningC28 D1 ImprovementC28, D1 No ChangeC28, D1 WorseningC29 D1 ImprovementC29, D1 No ChangeC29, D1 WorseningC30 D1 ImprovementC30, D1 No ChangeC30, D1 WorseningC31 D1 ImprovementC31, D1 No ChangeC31, D1 WorseningC32 D1 ImprovementC32, D1 No ChangeC32, D1 WorseningC33 D1 ImprovementC33, D1 No ChangeC33, D1 Worsening
Oral Azacitidine Plus Best Supportive Care32.038.529.536.339.524.236.836.227.035.236.428.437.734.128.136.236.227.639.032.928.138.834.526.641.531.526.936.033.630.439.732.228.137.638.523.940.233.326.543.835.420.838.045.716.337.244.218.634.539.126.440.532.926.640.828.930.334.742.722.735.336.827.941.727.830.640.028.631.438.233.827.933.843.123.141.930.627.447.527.924.633.933.932.239.641.518.939.637.522.934.742.922.428.345.726.1
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care35.640.024.435.544.320.239.435.625.047.230.622.238.335.226.641.830.627.636.040.024.035.633.331.041.033.325.638.535.925.643.731.025.450.028.321.740.329.030.649.127.323.643.129.427.542.634.023.443.236.420.543.931.724.450.022.527.550.027.522.552.626.321.148.628.622.947.129.423.541.932.325.846.740.013.350.031.318.845.238.716.151.635.512.953.121.925.050.034.415.665.510.324.154.233.312.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing a Clinically Meaningful Change (Improvement, No Change and Deterioration) in the EQ-5D-3L Scale From Baseline

The EQ-5D-3L is a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 5 questions, pertaining to specific health dimensions (ie, mobility, self-care, pain, usual activities, and anxiety/depression) and a health status scale. Each question has 3 levels of severity, corresponding to no problems, moderate problems and severe problems. Canadian population sample weights were used to derive health utility scores. A higher utility score represents a better health state. A clinically meaningful improvement or worsening was defined as at least 0.08 points of improvement or 0.10 points of worsening from baseline, respectively, for the EQ-5D-3L Health Utility Index. The instrument is scored using the United Kingdom (UK) index ranges from -0.594 to 1, where 0 equates to death and 1 equates to full health; -0.594 is considered 'worse than death'. (NCT01757535)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 2, Day 1 (C2D1), C3D1, C4D1, C5D1, C6D1, C7D1, C8D1, C9D1C3, C10D1, C11D1, C12D1, C13D1, C14D1, C15D1, C15D1, C16D1, C17D1, C18D1, C19D1, C20D1, C21D1, C22D1, C23D1, C24D1, C25D1 and continued on day 1 at each cycle through C33D1

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2, D1) ImprovementC2, D1 No ChangeC2, D1 WorseningC3, D1 ImprovementC3, D1 No ChangeC3, D1 WorseningC4, D1 ImprovementC4, D1 No ChangeC4, D1 WorseningC5, D1 ImprovementC5, D1 No ChangeC5, D1 WorseningC6, D1 ImprovementC6, D1 No ChangeC6, D1 WorseningC7, D1 ImprovementC7, D1 No ChangeC7, D1 WorseningC8, D1 ImprovementC8, D1 No ChangeC8, D1 WorseningC9, D1 ImprovementC9, D1 No ChangeC9, D1 WorseningC10, D1 ImprovementC10, D1 No ChangeC10, D1 WorseningC11, D1 ImprovementC11, D1 No ChangeC11, D1 WorseningC12, D1 ImprovementC12, D1 No changeC12, D1 WorseningC13, D1 ImprovementC13, D1 No ChangeC13, D1 WorseningC14, D1 ImprovementC14, D1 No ChangeC14, D1 WorseningC15 D1 ImprovementC15, D1 No ChangeC15, D1 WorseningC16 D1 ImprovementC16, D1 No ChangeC16, D1 WorseningC17 D1 ImprovementC17, D1 No ChangeC17, D1 WorseningC18 D1 ImprovementC18, D1 No ChangeC18, D1 WorseningC19 D1 ImprovementC19, D1 No ChangeC19, D1 WorseningC20 D1 ImprovementC20, D1 No ChangeC20, D1 WorseningC21 D1 ImprovementC21, D1 No ChangeC21, D1 WorseningC22 D1 ImprovementC22, D1 No ChangeC22, D1 WorseningC23 D1 ImprovementC23, D1 No ChangeC23, D1 WorseningC24 D1 ImprovementC24, D1 No ChangeC24, D1 WorseningC25 D1 ImprovementC25, D1 No ChangeC25, D1 WorseningC26 D1 ImprovementC26, D1 No ChangeC26, D1 WorseningC27 D1 ImprovementC27, D1 No ChangeC27, D1 WorseningC28 D1 ImprovementC28, D1 No ChangeC28, D1 WorseningC29 D1 ImprovementC29, D1 No ChangeC29, D1 WorseningC30 D1 ImprovementC30, D1 No ChangeC30, D1 WorseningC31 D1 ImprovementC31, D1 No ChangeC31, D1 WorseningC32 D1 ImprovementC32, D1 No ChangeC32, D1 WorseningC33 D1 ImprovementC33, D1 No ChangeC33, D1 Worsening
Oral Azacitidine Plus Best Supportive Care10.682.96.512.277.810.112.679.87.713.277.69.211.581.86.713.377.39.313.173.113.810.977.511.616.972.310.816.076.08.014.975.29.917.676.95.616.873.39.918.872.98.317.476.16.517.672.99.418.471.310.317.773.48.919.771.19.217.374.78.016.272.111.811.179.29.715.774.310.016.276.57.415.472.312.316.171.012.911.577.011.516.971.211.915.175.59.414.672.912.512.273.514.315.278.36.5
Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care12.978.78.413.779.27.114.678.57.013.477.59.215.976.27.916.779.24.218.274.47.115.376.58.211.880.37.920.073.36.713.282.44.415.378.06.814.875.49.814.883.31.919.676.53.926.171.72.220.572.76.814.680.54.920.075.05.025.070.05.026.371.12.622.974.32.923.570.65.916.177.46.523.370.06.721.975.03.122.671.06.522.671.06.531.356.312.525.062.512.513.879.36.912.579.28.3

[back to top]

MTD Expansion Phase, Rac: Observed Accumulation Ratio for MLN4924

(NCT01814826)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 24 hours) post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 5 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 48 hours) post-dose (Cycle length = 28 days)

,
Interventionratio (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 5
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 IntravenousNA
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 SubcutaneousNA

[back to top]

Dose-escalation Phase, Lambdaz: Terminal Disposition Phase Rate Constant for MLN4924

(NCT01814826)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 24 hours) post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 5 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 48 hours) post-dose (Cycle length = 28 days)

,
Intervention1 per hour (1/hr) (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 5
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous0.090.09
MLN4924 30 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous0.09NA

[back to top]

Dose-escalation Phase, Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for MLN4924

(NCT01814826)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 24 hours) post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 5 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 48 hours) post-dose (Cycle length is equal to [=] 28 days)

,
Interventionnanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 5
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous173.60177.87
MLN4924 30 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous306.67NA

[back to top]

Dose-escalation Phase, CLp: Systemic Clearance for MLN4924

(NCT01814826)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 24 hours) post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 5 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 48 hours) post-dose (Cycle length = 28 days)

,
Interventionliter per hour (L/hr) (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 5
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous35.6935.27
MLN4924 30 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous29.78NA

[back to top]

Dose-escalation Phase, AUCinf: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Extrapolated to Infinity for MLN4924

(NCT01814826)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 24 hours) post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 5 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 48 hours) post-dose (Cycle length = 28 days)

,
Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous1101.81
MLN4924 30 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous1823.68

[back to top]

Dose-escalation Phase, AUC24hours: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours Post-Dose for MLN4924

(NCT01814826)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 24 hours) post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 5 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 24 hours) post-dose (Cycle length = 28 days)

,
Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 5
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous1020.321039.54
MLN4924 30 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous1675.41NA

[back to top]

Dose-escalation Phase, AUC0-tau: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the End of the Dosing Interval (Tau) for MLN4924

(NCT01814826)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 24 hours) post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 5 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 48 hours) post-dose (Cycle length = 28 days)

,
Interventionhour*nanogram per milliliter (hr*ng/mL) (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 5
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous1151.201139.67
MLN4924 30 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous1805.47NA

[back to top]

Best Overall Response Rate

Disease response was based on best overall response as determined by an investigator based on revised recommendations of the International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for AML. Best overall response rate was defined as percentage of participants who had complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or CR/remission with incomplete blood count recovery (Cri). CR: free of leukemia-related symptoms, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than (>)1.0*10^9 per liter (/L), platelet count greater than or equal to (>=) 100*10^9/L, normal bone marrow with <5 percent (%) blasts and no Auer rods. CRi: As per CR but with residual thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100*10^9/L) or residual neutropenia (ANC <1.0*10^9/L). PR: >=50% decrease bone marrow blasts to 5 to 25% abnormal cells, or CR with less than or equal to (<=) 5% blasts if Auer rods present. (NCT01814826)
Timeframe: Cycle(C)1Day(D)22 and at C2 between D20 and 28 and at C4 and beyond C4 after completion of every 3rd C between D15 and 28 up to 30 days after last dose of study drug/before start of subsequent antineoplastic therapy, if that occurred sooner(up to 5 years)

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CRPRCRi
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous43144
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Subcutaneous331313
MLN4924 30 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous5000

[back to top]

Dose-escalation Phase, Rac: Observed Accumulation Ratio for MLN4924

(NCT01814826)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 24 hours) post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 5 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 48 hours) post-dose (Cycle length = 28 days)

,
Interventionratio (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 5
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous0.99
MLN4924 30 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 IntravenousNA

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

(NCT01814826)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 5 years)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TEAEsSAEs
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous3221
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Subcutaneous2922
MLN4924 30 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous33

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

MTD Expansion Phase, Vss: Volume of Distribution at Steady-state for MLN4924

(NCT01814826)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 24 hours) post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 5 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 48 hours) post-dose (Cycle length = 28 days)

,
Interventionliter (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 5
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous370.53401.41
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Subcutaneous348.66370.97

[back to top]

MTD Expansion Phase, Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for MLN4924

(NCT01814826)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 24 hours) post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 5 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 48 hours) post-dose (Cycle length = 28 days)

,
Interventionhour (Median)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 5
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous1.011.0
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Subcutaneous1.000.98

[back to top]

MTD Expansion Phase, t1/2: Terminal Disposition Phase Half-life for MLN4924

(NCT01814826)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 24 hours) post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 5 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 48 hours) post-dose (Cycle length = 28 days)

,
Interventionhour (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 5
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous7.458.07
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Subcutaneous7.307.89

[back to top]

MTD Expansion Phase, Lambdaz: Terminal Disposition Phase Rate Constant for MLN4924

(NCT01814826)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 24 hours) post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 5 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 48 hours) post-dose (Cycle length = 28 days)

,
Intervention1/hr (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 5
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous0.100.09
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Subcutaneous0.100.09

[back to top]

Thirty-day Mortality Rate

(NCT01814826)
Timeframe: 30 days after the first dose of study drug in Cycle 1 (Cycle Length=28 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous5
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Subcutaneous6
MLN4924 30 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous0

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug to the date of death. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival, along with the corresponding 95% confidence interval. (NCT01814826)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study drug up to date of death (up to 5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous12.25
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Subcutaneous4.93
MLN4924 30 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous5.22

[back to top]

Dose-escalation Phase, Ctrough: Observed Plasma Concentration at the End of the Dosing Interval for MLN4924

(NCT01814826)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 24 hours) post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 5 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 48 hours) post-dose (Cycle length = 28 days)

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 5
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous2.341.40
MLN4924 30 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous1.68NA

[back to top]

MTD Expansion Phase, Ctrough: Observed Plasma Concentration at the End of the Dosing Interval for MLN4924

(NCT01814826)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 24 hours) post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 5 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 48 hours) post-dose (Cycle length = 28 days)

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 5
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous0.871.51
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Subcutaneous0.911.30

[back to top]

MTD Expansion Phase, CLp: Systemic Clearance for MLN4924

(NCT01814826)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 24 hours) post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 5 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 48 hours) post-dose (Cycle length = 28 days)

,
InterventionL/hr (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 5
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous41.3538.10
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Subcutaneous39.2034.02

[back to top]

MTD Expansion Phase, AUCinf: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Extrapolated to Infinity for MLN4924

(NCT01814826)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 24 hours) post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 5 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 48 hours) post-dose (Cycle length = 28 days)

,
Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous990.58
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Subcutaneous1026.45

[back to top]

MTD Expansion Phase, AUC24hours: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours Post-Dose for MLN4924

(NCT01814826)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 24 hours) post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 5 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 24 hours) post-dose (Cycle length = 28 days)

,
Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 5
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous891.89946.91
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Subcutaneous926.74954.07

[back to top]

MTD Expansion Phase, AUC0-tau: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the End of the Dosing Interval (Tau) for MLN4924

(NCT01814826)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 24 hours) post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 5 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 48 hours) post-dose (Cycle length = 28 days)

,
Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 5
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 IntravenousNA1125.90
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 SubcutaneousNA1122.91

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) Expansion Phase, Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for MLN4924

(NCT01814826)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 24 hours) post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 5 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 48 hours) post-dose (Cycle length = 28 days)

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 5
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous168.80176.65
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Subcutaneous159.78158.95

[back to top]

Duration of Response

The duration of response was defined in participants with disease response (CR, CRi, or PR) as the time between the first documentation of response and disease progression. Duration of response was determined by an investigator based on revised recommendations of the IWG Response Criteria for AML. CR: free of leukemia-related symptoms, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than (>)1.0*10^9 per liter (/L), platelet count greater than or equal to (>=) 100*10^9/L, normal bone marrow with <5 percent (%) blasts and no Auer rods. CRi: As per CR but with residual thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100*10^9/L) or residual neutropenia (ANC <1.0*10^9/L). PR: >=50% decrease bone marrow blasts to 5 to 25% abnormal cells, or CR with less than or equal to (<=) 5% blasts if Auer rods present. (NCT01814826)
Timeframe: From the date of first documented CR, PR or CRi up to the date of first disease progression (Up to 5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous9.0
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Subcutaneous6.0

[back to top]

Dose-escalation Phase, Vss: Volume of Distribution at Steady-state for MLN4924

(NCT01814826)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 24 hours) post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 5 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 48 hours) post-dose (Cycle length = 28 days)

,
Interventionliter (L) (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 5
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous352.06351.82
MLN4924 30 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous257.32NA

[back to top]

Dose-escalation Phase, Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for MLN4924

(NCT01814826)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 24 hours) post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 5 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 48 hours) post-dose (Cycle length = 28 days)

,
Interventionhour (Median)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle Day 5
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous1.061.0
MLN4924 30 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous1.0NA

[back to top]

Dose-escalation Phase, t1/2: Terminal Disposition Phase Half-life for MLN4924

(NCT01814826)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 24 hours) post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 5 pre-dose and at multiple time points (up to 48 hours) post-dose (Cycle length = 28 days)

,
Interventionhour (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 5
MLN4924 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous7.807.98
MLN4924 30 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 Intravenous7.39NA

[back to top]

Response Rate as Assessed by Number of Participants With Partial or Complete Response

Response rate (partial response or complete response) to first-line chemotherapy when given after visible disease recurrence in patients primed with CC-486 compared to observation. Partial and complete responses were assessed by standard of care radiology reads and documented scan interpretations. (NCT01845805)
Timeframe: 11 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A: CC-4861
Arm B: Observation0

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Progression free survival is defined as the time from randomization until visible recurrence on any imaging modality, a confirmed biopsy, or death. Individuals lost to follow-up prior to having an event will be censored at the time of the last scan or biopsy. (NCT01845805)
Timeframe: 25 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: CC-4869.2
Arm B: Observation8.9

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization until death. Individuals lost to follow-up prior to death will be censored at the time of last physician contact. (NCT01845805)
Timeframe: 47 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: CC-48633.8
Arm B: Observation26.4

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

"Overall response rate (ORR) was assessed as the number and proportion of participants who received midostaurin and achieved a partial response (PR), complete response (CR), or complete response with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi).~Complete remission (CR): Bone marrow blasts < 5%; absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 1000/μL; platelet count > 100,000/μL; independence of red cell transfusions.~CR with incomplete recovery (CRi): All CR criteria except for ANC < 1000/μL or platelet count < 100,000/μL.~Partial remission (PR): All hematologic criteria of CR; except decrease of bone marrow blast percentage to 5% to 25%; and decrease of pretreatment bone marrow blast percentage by at least 50%." (NCT01846624)
Timeframe: up to 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Decitabine, Then Midostaurin10

[back to top]

Median Duration of Response (DoR)

"Response was assessed by evaluations conducted every 3 cycles (12 weeks). Once documented as partial response (PR), complete response (CR), or complete response with incomplete blood count recover (CRi), response status was confirmed every 12 weeks. In responding participants, duration of response was assessed from the start of treatment through the last documented response before documented progressive disease or death. The outcome is reported as the median value for duration of response, with full range.~CR: Bone marrow blasts < 5%; absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; ANC > 1000/μL; platelet > 100,000/μL; independence of red cell transfusions.~CRi: All CR criteria except ANC < 1000/μL or platelet count < 100,000/μL.~PR: All hematologic criteria of CR; except decrease of bone marrow blast percentage to 5% to 25%; & decrease of pretreatment bone marrow blast percentage by at least 50%." (NCT01846624)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionweeks (Median)
Decitabine, Then Midostaurin24

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Survival is reported as the number and proportion of participants that received midostaurin who remained alive 2 years after starting midostaurin treatment. (NCT01846624)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Decitabine, Then Midostaurin2

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

"Progression-free survival (PFS) is reported as the number and proportion of participants who did not receive hematopoietic cell transplantation, and who did not experience disease progression or death for any reason within 2 years after starting midostaurin treatment.~Progressive disease: Bone marrow blasts ≥ 5%; or reappearance of blasts in the blood; or development of extramedullary disease." (NCT01846624)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Decitabine, Then Midostaurin0

[back to top]

Complete Remission (CR) Rate

"The complete remission (CR) rate, or complete response rate, is reported as the sum and proportion of participants that achieved CR or CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi), within 12 months of starting midostaurin treatment.~Complete remission (CR): Bone marrow blasts < 5%; absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 1000/μL; platelet count > 100,000/μL; independence of red cell transfusions.~CR with incomplete recovery (CRi): All CR criteria except for ANC < 1000/μL or platelet count < 100,000/μL.~Partial remission (PR): All hematologic criteria of CR; except decrease of bone marrow blast percentage to 5% to 25%; and decrease of pretreatment bone marrow blast percentage by at least 50%." (NCT01846624)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Decitabine, Then Midostaurin8

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced a Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)

To evaluate the side effects of giving Azacytidine before and during chemotherapy using the standard drugs Fludarabine, Cytarabine, IT Cytarabine (AML patients) and IT methotrexate (ALL patients) (NCT01861002)
Timeframe: From Day 1 to Day 42 (Cycle 1)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
# of patients with DLT# of patients without DLT# of patients not evaluable
Dose 75 mg/m2/Day Azacytidine Diagnosed With ALL020
Dose 75 mg/m2/Day Azacytidine Diagnosed With AML0121

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing a Dose Limiting Toxicity

"Number of participants experiencing a Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) in each dose level. DLT is defined as any of the following study drug-related toxicities occurring during the first cycle of study drug on study:~grade 4 thrombocytopenia lasting >7days~any grade 3-4 febrile neutropenia~grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity unless it could be managed by supportive treatment~any other clinically significant adverse event which would place subjects at undue safety risk, or results in discontinuation of treatment." (NCT01896856)
Timeframe: 28 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose Level 11
Dose Level -12
Dose Level -1G1
Dose Level 1G1

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

Objective Response Rate (ORR) is defined as the number of subjects achieving a Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria. CR = disappearance of all target lesions, PR = at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions. (NCT01896856)
Timeframe: Assessed until disease progression, up to 3 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 2: Arm A SGI-110 + Irinotecan1
Phase 2: Arm B Regorafenib or TAS-1020

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall Survival is defined as the time (in months) between the start of treatment and death. (NCT01896856)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase 2: Arm A SGI-110 + Irinotecan7.15
Phase 2: Arm B Regorafenib or TAS-1027.66

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Progression Free Survival is the time (in months) from start of treatment to progression, clinical deterioration attributed to disease, or death. (NCT01896856)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase 2: Arm A SGI-110 + Irinotecan2.37
Phase 2: Arm B Regorafenib or TAS-1022.09

[back to top]

Best Response Rate

"Proportion of patients assessed as having achieved a disease response of either CR or CRi or MLFS according to the IWG criteria. CR (ie, complete remission defined as <5% blasts in the bone marrow, no blasts with Auer rods, no extramedullary disease, ANC ≥1000/μL, and platelets ≥100,000/μL must be independent of transfusions for at least 1 week before each assessment).~CRi (ie, morphologic complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery, defined as morphologic CR with residual neutropenia (<1,000/μL) or residual thrombocytopenia (<100,000/μL), no extramedullary disease, does not require transfusion independence) MLFS (ie, morphologic leukemia free state, defined as <5% blasts in an aspirate sample with marrow spicules, no extramedullary disease, does not require transfusion independence)" (NCT01912274)
Timeframe: through study completion up to a maximum of three years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pracinostat With Azacitadine26

[back to top]

Overall Survival

time from the first day of study drug administration to death (NCT01912274)
Timeframe: through study completion up to a maximum of three years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Pracinostat With Azacitadine19.08

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

proportion of patients with CR plus CRi plus MLFS plus PR plus PRi (NCT01912274)
Timeframe: through study completion up to a maximum of three years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pracinostat With Azacitadine32

[back to top]

Duration of Response

The duration of the response to treatment with pracinostat plus azacitidine was determined by the Investigator for patients who achieved a CR, CRi, PR, PRi, or MLFS. The duration was defined as the time from the initial determination of response to the time of relapse, PD, or death, whichever occurred first plus 1 day. (NCT01912274)
Timeframe: through study completion up to a maximum of three years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Pracinostat With Azacitadine11.54

[back to top]

Complete Cytogenetic Response Plus Molecular Complete Remission

proportion of patients assessed as having complete cytogenetic response (CRc) + molecular complete remission (CRm) to pracinostat plus azacitidine (NCT01912274)
Timeframe: through study completion up to a maximum of three years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pracinostat With Azacitadine1

[back to top]

Duration of Best Response

The duration of the best response to treatment with pracinostat plus azacitidine was determined by the Investigator for patients who achieved a CR, CRi, or MLFS. The duration was defined as the time from the initial determination of response to the time of relapse, PD, or death, whichever occurred first plus 1 day. (NCT01912274)
Timeframe: through study completion up to a maximum of 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Pracinostat With Azacitadine11.54

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

time from the first day of study administration to PD, relapse from CR/CRi/MLFS, lack of efficacy or death. (NCT01912274)
Timeframe: through study completion up to a maximum of three years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Pracinostat With Azacitadine12.56

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) in Cycle 1

Number of participants with Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) in Cycle 1 (escalation part to determine MTD) is presented . (NCT01957644)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Volasertib 250 mg + Azacitidine (Escalation Cohort)-Part 11
Volasertib 300 mg + Azacitidine (Escalation Cohort)- Part 11
Volasertib 170 mg/m2 + Azacitidine (Escalation Cohort)- Part 20
Volasertib 110 mg/m2 + Azacitidine (Escalation Cohort)- Part 21

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Objective Response (OR)

"OR was defined as best overall response of complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) defined according to the International Working Group (IWG) 2006 criteria.~Complete remission (CR):~Bone marrow: <5 % myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines*~Persistent dysplasia will be noted*~Peripheral blood:~hemoglobin (Hgb) > 11 Grams Per Decilitre (g/dL)~Platelets >100 x 109/L~Neutrophils > 1.0 x 109/L~Blasts 0 % *Dysplastic changes should consider the normal range of dysplastic changes~Partial remission (PR):~All CR criteria if abnormal before treatment except:~Bone marrow blasts decreased by >50% to pre-treatment but still >5%~Cellularity and morphology not relevant" (NCT01957644)
Timeframe: From randomisation until data cut-off (16Dec2016); up to 159 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Volasertib 250 mg + Azacitidine (Escalation Cohort)-Part 133.3
Volasertib 300 mg + Azacitidine (Escalation Cohort)- Part 120.0
Volasertib 250 mg + Azacitidine (Expansion Cohort)- Part 10.0
Volasertib 170 mg/m2 + Azacitidine (Escalation Cohort)- Part 20.0
Volasertib 110 mg/m2 + Azacitidine (Escalation Cohort)- Part 20.0

[back to top]

Determination of the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) Based on the Occurrence of Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) in Cycle 1

"The primary objective of the dose-escalation part of this study was to determine the MTD of volasertib in combination with azacitidine. The MTD was to be identified based on the DLT information collected during the first treatment cycle of each dosing schedule. DLT was defined as a non-haematological drug-related toxicity of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade ≥3. The MTD corresponded to the highest dose of volasertib and azacitidine at which the incidence of DLT was ≤17% (i.e. 1/6 patients) during Cycle 1.~The planned dose escalation schedules of Part 2 were not completed because the trial was prematurely discontinued. Hence, a final conclusion of the MTD of volasertib in combination with azacitidine cannot be drawn in this trial.~Number of patients with DLT in cycle 1 in escalation part is presented to determine MTD." (NCT01957644)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

InterventionMilligram (mg) (Number)
Volasertib 250 mg + Azacitidine (Escalation Cohort)-Part 1NA
Volasertib 300 mg + Azacitidine (Escalation Cohort)- Part 1NA
Volasertib 170 mg/m2 + Azacitidine (Escalation Cohort)- Part 2NA
Volasertib 110 mg/m2 + Azacitidine (Escalation Cohort)- Part 2NA

[back to top]

Frequency of DLT

Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of azacitidine based on DLT was defined as any Grade 4 nonhematologic and noninfectious toxicity or any grade 3 mucositis or skin toxicity lasting > 3 days at peak severity. For dose finding, the continunal reassessment method was used with a target DLT probability per cohort of 25%. Azacitidine doses were chosen adaptively for sucessive cohorts with a minimum size of 2 patients. Toxicity scoring followed the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, version 3. (NCT01983969)
Timeframe: Enrollment up to day 30 post transplant for each dosing cohort

InterventionDose-limiting toxicities (Number)
Azacitidine Dose Level 116
Azacitidine Dose Level 228
Azacitidine Dose Level 340

[back to top]

Participants With Event-free Survival (EFS)

EFS is defined as the time from transplantation to either relapse, second tumors, or death, whichever occurred first, or last contact. EFS was analzyed by the individual disease groups rather than the cohort dose levels. (NCT01983969)
Timeframe: Enrollment up to 100 days post transplant.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
DLBCL17
Hodgkin Lymphoma16
T-cell NHL7
Other B-cell Lymphoma5

[back to top]

Frequency of Adverse Events, Graded According to NCI CTCAE v4.0

Maximum grade per participant of any AE. (NCT02029417)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days after last dose of study drugs

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4
Treatment (Cytarabine, Omacetaxine Mepesuccinate, Decitabine)0002

[back to top]

Multiple Dose- Cmax, Cmin, Cavg, and Ctrough of Azacitidine: Combination Cohort 3

Cmax = Maximum plasma concentration, observed directly from data. Cmin = Minimum plasma concentration observed directly from data. Cavg = Average plasma concentration over the dosing interval of 24 hours. Ctrough = Pre-dose concentration, observed directly from data. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Cmax: 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 hrs post azacitidine dose on Day 1/Cycle 1;Cmin: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 hrs post azacitidine dose on Day 7/Cycle 1;Cavg: 0 to 24 hrs post azacitidine dose on Day 7/Cycle 1;Ctrough:Pre azacitidine dose on Day 7/Cycle 1

InterventionNanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Cmax: Cycle 1/Day 1Cmax: Cycle 1/Day 7Cmin: Cycle 1/Day 7Cavg: Cycle 1/Day 7Ctrough: Cycle 1/Day 7
Combination Cohort 3: PF-04449913 100 mg + Azacitidine18031717NA51.60NA

[back to top]

Multiple Dose- Cmax, Cmin, Cavg, and Ctrough of Cytarabine: Combination Cohort 1

LDAC= low dose ara-cytarabine/low dose cytarabine. Cmax = Maximum plasma concentration, observed directly from data. Cmin = Minimum plasma concentration observed directly from data. Cavg = Average plasma concentration over the dosing interval, dosing interval was of 24 hours, dosing interval was of 12 hours. Ctrough = Pre-dose concentration, observed directly from data. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Cmax, Cmin: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post LDAC dosing on Day 2 and Day 10 of Cycle 1; Cavg: 0 to 12 hours post LDAC dosing on Day 2 and Day 10 of Cycle 1; Ctrough: Pre-LDAC dose on Day 2 and Day 10 of Cycle 1

InterventionNanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Cmax: Cycle 1/Day 2Cmin: Cycle 1/Day 2Cavg: Cycle 1/Day 2Ctrough: Cycle 1/Day 2Cmax: Cycle 1/Day 10Cmin: Cycle 1/Day 10Cavg: Cycle 1/Day 10Ctrough: Cycle 1/Day 10
Combination Cohort 1 (Unfit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + LDAC 20 mg82.88NA6.511NA106.70.59038.1350.5903

[back to top]

Multiple Dose- Cmax, Cmin, Cavg, and Ctrough of Daunorubicin: Combination Cohort 2

Cmax = Maximum plasma concentration, observed directly from data. Cmin = Minimum plasma concentration observed directly from data. Cavg = Average plasma concentration over the dosing interval, dosing interval was of 24 hours. Ctrough = Pre-dose concentration, observed directly from data. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Cmax, Cmin: Pre-dose, 0.25 (mid-infusion), 0.5 (immediately prior to end of infusion), 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post daunorubicin dosing on Day 3 of induction Cycle (IC) 1; Cavg: 0 to 24 hours post dose on Day 3 of IC 1; Ctrough: Pre-dose on Day 3 of IC 1

InterventionNanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
CmaxCminCavgCtrough
Combination Cohort 2 (Fit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin942.82.58930.892.673

[back to top]

Multiple Dose- Cmax, Cmin, Cavg, and Ctrough of Daunorubicinol: Combination Cohort 2

Cmax = Maximum plasma concentration, observed directly from data. Cmin = Minimum plasma concentration observed directly from data. Cavg = Average plasma concentration over the dosing interval of 24 hours. Ctrough = Pre-dose concentration, observed directly from data. Daunorubicinol was a metabolite of daunorubicin. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Cmax, Cmin: Pre-dose, 0.25 (mid-infusion), 0.5 (immediately prior to end of infusion), 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post daunorubicin dosing on Day 3 of induction Cycle (IC) 1; Cavg: 0 to 24 hours post dose on Day 3 of IC 1; Ctrough: Pre-dose on Day 3 of IC 1

InterventionNanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
CmaxCminCavgCtrough
Combination Cohort 2 (Fit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin244.466.38116.766.53

[back to top]

Multiple Dose- Cmax, Cmin, Cavg, and Ctrough of PF-04449913: Combination Cohort 1

Cmax = Maximum plasma concentration, observed directly from data. Cmin = Minimum plasma concentration observed directly from data. Cavg = Average plasma concentration over the dosing interval, dosing interval was of 24 hours. Ctrough = Pre-dose concentration, observed directly from data. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Cmax, Cmin: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post PF-04449913 dose on Day 10 and 21 of Cycle 1; Cavg: 0 to 24 hours post PF-04449913 dose on Day 10 and 21 of Cycle; Ctrough: Pre-dose on Day 10 and 21 of Cycle 1

InterventionNanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Cmax: Cycle 1/Day 10Cmin: Cycle 1/Day 10Cavg: Cycle 1/Day 10Ctrough: Cycle 1/Day 10Cmax: Cycle 1/Day 21Cmin: Cycle 1/Day 21Cavg: Cycle 1/Day 21Ctrough: Cycle 1/Day 21
Combination Cohort 1 (Unfit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + LDAC 20 mg1172317.6648.3330.71317341.6670.5376.2

[back to top]

Multiple Dose- Cmax, Cmin, Cavg, and Ctrough of PF-04449913: Combination Cohort 2

Cmax = Maximum plasma concentration, observed directly from data. Cmin = Minimum plasma concentration observed directly from data. Cavg = Average plasma concentration over the dosing interval, dosing interval was of 24 hours. Ctrough = Pre-dose concentration, observed directly from data. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Cmax, Cmin: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 6, and 24 hrs post dose on Day 3, 10 of induction Cycle (IC) 1 and 4 hrs post dose on Day 10 of IC 1; Cavg: 0 to 24 hrs post dose on Day 3 and Day 10 of IC 1; Ctrough: Pre dose on Day 3 and Day 10 of IC 1 (PF-04449913 Dose)

InterventionNanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Cmax: Cycle 1/Day 3Cmin: Cycle 1/Day 3Cavg: Cycle 1/Day 3Ctrough: Cycle 1/Day 3Cmax: Cycle 1/Day 10Cmin: Cycle 1/Day 10Cavg: Cycle 1/Day 10Ctrough: Cycle 1/Day 10
Combination Cohort 2 (Fit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin1047318.2650.9354.01181356.1755.2359.5

[back to top]

Multiple Dose- Cmax, Cmin, Cavg, and Ctrough of PF-04449913: Combination Cohort 3

Cmax = Maximum plasma concentration, observed directly from data. Cmin = Minimum plasma concentration observed directly from data. Cavg = Average plasma concentration over the dosing interval, dosing interval was of 24 hours. Ctrough = Pre-dose concentration, observed directly from data. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Cmax, Cmin: Pre-dose, 0.25, 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post PF-04449913 dosing on Day 7 and Day 21 of Cycle 1; Cavg: 0 to 24 hors post PF-04449913 dosing on Day 7 and Day 21 of Cycle 1; Ctrough: Pre PF-04449913 dosing on Day 7 and Day 21 of Cycle 1

InterventionNanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Cmax: Cycle 1/Day 7Cmin: Cycle 1/Day 7Cavg: Cycle 1/Day 7Ctrough: Cycle 1/Day 7Cmax: Cycle 1/Day 21Cmin: Cycle 1/Day 21Cavg: Cycle 1/Day 21Ctrough: Cycle 1/Day 21
Combination Cohort 3: PF-04449913 100 mg + Azacitidine1387414.1834.6526.31218323.2701.9347.5

[back to top]

Multiple Dose- T1/2 of Cytarabine: Combination Cohort 1

LDAC= low dose ara-cytarabine/low dose cytarabine. Terminal plasma half-life is the time required to divide the plasma concentration by two after reaching pseudo-equilibrium. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post LDAC dosing on Day 2 and Day 10 of Cycle 1

InterventionHours (Mean)
Cycle 1/Day 2Cycle 1/Day 10
Combination Cohort 1 (Unfit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + LDAC 20 mg1.0270.8618

[back to top]

Multiple Dose- Tmax of Ara-uridine: Combination Cohort 1

Ara-uridine was a metabolite of cytarabine. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post LDAC dosing on Day 2 and Day 10 of Cycle 1

InterventionHours (Median)
Cycle 1/Day 2Cycle 1/Day 10
Combination Cohort 1 (Unfit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + LDAC 20 mg1.5152.000

[back to top]

Multiple Dose- Tmax of Azacitidine: Combination Cohort 3

(NCT02038777)
Timeframe: 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 6 hours post azacitidine dosing on Day 1 of Cycle 1 and pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 6 hours post azacitidine dosing on Day 7 of Cycle 1

InterventionHours (Median)
Day 1Day 7
Combination Cohort 3: PF-04449913 100 mg + Azacitidine0.25000.2500

[back to top]

Multiple Dose- Tmax of Cytarabine: Combination Cohort 1

LDAC= low dose ara-cytarabine/low dose cytarabine. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post LDAC dosing on Day 2 and Day 10 of Cycle 1

InterventionHours (Median)
Cycle 1/Day 2Cycle 1/Day 10
Combination Cohort 1 (Unfit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + LDAC 20 mg0.25000.2500

[back to top]

Multiple Dose- Tmax of PF-04449913: Combination Cohort 1

(NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post PF-04449913 dose on Day 10 and Day 21 of Cycle 1

InterventionHours (Median)
Cycle 1/Day 10Cycle 1/Day 21
Combination Cohort 1 (Unfit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + LDAC 20 mg3.9501.935

[back to top]

Multiple Dose- Tmax of PF-04449913: Combination Cohort 2

(NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 6, and 24 hours post PF-04449913 dosing on Day 3 of Induction Cycle 1 and pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 4, 6, and 24 hours post PF-04449913 dosing on Day 10 of Induction Cycle 1

InterventionHours (Median)
Cycle 1/Day 3Cycle 1/Day 10
Combination Cohort 2 (Fit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin5.9505.065

[back to top]

Multiple Dose- Tmax of PF-04449913: Combination Cohort 3

(NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.25, 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post PF-04449913 dosing on Day 7 and Day 21 of Cycle 1

InterventionHours (Median)
Cycle 1/Day 7Cycle 1/Day 21
Combination Cohort 3: PF-04449913 100 mg + Azacitidine4.0002.500

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Best Response: Combination Cohort 1

Best response observed for: CR, Cri, MLFS, PR, PRi, CRc, CRm. Response criteria for participants with AML- CR: neutrophils [mcL] >=1000, platelets(pt)[mcL] >=10^5, BMB <5%. CRi: neutrophils (mcL) <1000 or pt (mcL) <100000, BMB <5%. MLFS: neutrophils (mcL) 1000 and pt (mcL) <10^5, BMB <5%. PR: neutrophils (mcL) >=1000, pt (mcL) >=100000, decrease to 5-25 and >=50% decrease from start. PRi: neutrophils (mcL) <1000 or pt (mcL) <10^5, BMB decrease to 5-25 and >=50% decrease from start. Minor Response: BMB >=25% decrease from start. CRc: neutrophils (mcL) >1,000, pt (mcL) >10^6, BMB <5%. CRm: neutrophils (mcL) >1,000, pt (mcL) >100,000, BMB <5%. For participants with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), DMR- CR: >=11 Hgb (g/dL), >=1*10^9 neutrophils(L), >=100*10^9 pt(L), 0% blasts, <=5% BMB. mCR: HI response, <=5% and decreased by >=50% BMB. PR: decrease by >=50% but still >5% BMB. Only those responses which had at least 1 participant were reported. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to end of treatment (maximum up to 486 days)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Morphologic CR: AMLStable disease: AMLTreatment failure: AMLStable disease: MDS
Combination Cohort 1 (Unfit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + LDAC 20 mg1122

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Best Response: Combination Cohort 2

Best response observed for: CR, Cri, MLFS, PR, PRi, CRc, CRm. Response criteria for AML- CR:neutrophils(nt)[mcL] >=1000, platelets (mcL) >=100000, BMB <5%. CRi: nt(mcL) <1000 or platelets (mcL) <100000, BMB <5%. MLFS: nt(mcL) 1000 and platelets (mcL) <100000, BMB <5%. PR: nt(mcL) >=1000, platelets (mcL) >=100000, decrease to 5-25 and >=50% decrease from start. PRi: nt(mcL) <1000 or platelets (mcL) <100000, BMB decrease to 5-25 and >=50% decrease from start. Minor Response: BMB >=25% decrease from start. Cytogenetic CR (CRc): nt(mcL) >1,000, platelets (mcL) >100,000, BMB <5%. CRm: nt(mcL) >1,000, platelets (mcL) >100,000, BMB <5%. For participants with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), DMR was defined as - CR: >=11 Hgb (g/dL), >=1*10^9 nt(L), >=100*10^9 platelets (L), 0% blasts, <=5% BMB. mCR: HI response, <=5% and decreased by >=50% BMB. PR: decrease by >=50% but still >5% BMB. Only those responses which had at least 1 participant were reported. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to end of treatment (maximum up to 343 days)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Morphologic CR: AMLMorphologic CRi: AMLMLFs: AMLPR: AMLMR: AMLTreatment failure: AMLRelapse: AMLIndeterminate: AML
Combination Cohort 2 (Fit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin32212111

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Best Response: Combination Cohort 3

Best response observed for: CR, Cri, MLFS, PR, PRi, CRc, CRm. Response criteria for participants with AML- CR: neutrophils (mcL) >=1000, platelets (mcL) >=100000, BMB <5%. CRi: neutrophils (mcL) <1000 or platelets (mcL) <100000, BMB <5%. MLFS: neutrophils (mcL) 1000 and platelets (mcL) <100000, BMB <5%. PR: neutrophils (mcL) >=1000, platelets (mcL) >=100000, decrease to 5-25 and >=50% decrease from start. PRi: neutrophils (mcL) <1000 or platelets (mcL) <100000, BMB decrease to 5-25 and >=50% decrease from start. Minor Response: BMB >=25% decrease from start. CRc: neutrophils (mcL) >1,000, platelets (mcL) >100,000, BMB <5%. CRm: neutrophils (mcL) >1,000, platelets (mcL) >100,000, BMB <5%. Only those responses which had at least 1 participant were reported. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to end of treatment (maximum up to 841 days)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Morphologic CRPRiTreatment failure
Combination Cohort 3: PF-04449913 100 mg + Azacitidine312

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Best Response: Monotherapy Cohort

Best response observed for: CR, Cri, MLFS, PR, PRi, CytogeneticCR(CRc), MolecularCR(CRm). For AML-CR:neutrophils(nt) [mcL]>=1000, platelets(pt)[mcL]>=10^5, BMB<5%. CRi:nt(mcL)<1000/pt(mcL)<10^5, BMB<5%. MLFS:nt(mcL)1000 and pt(mcL)<10^5, BMB<5%. PR:nt(mcL)>=1000, pt(mcL)>=10^5, decrease to 5-25 and >=50% decrease from start. PRi: nt<1000, <10^5. CRc: nt(mcL)>1,000, pt(mcL)>10^5, BMB<5%. CRm: nt(mcL)>1,000, pt(uL)>10^5, BMB<5%. For myelodysplasia-CR: hemoglobin(Hgb)[gram per deciliter{g/dL}]>=11, nt(L)>=1*10^9, pt(L)>=100*10^9, blasts0%, BMB<=5%. mCR:<=5% and decreased by >=50% BMB. PR:decrease by>=50% with >5% BMB, CRc: disappearance of chromosomal abnormality, no new appearance, PRc:>=50% reduced chromosomal abnormality. For myleofibrosis-CR: hgb(g/L)>=110, nt(L)>=1*10^9, pt(L)>=100*10^9, All <=ULN, BMB <=5%. PR: hgb>=110, nt(L)>=1*10^9, pt(L)>=100*10^9. CML- PR: 1-35% Philadelphia chromosome(PC) positive(+) cells, CR:0% PC+ cells. Responses with at least 1 participant were reported. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to End of Treatment (25 mg: maximum up to 108 days; 50 mg: maximum up to 151 days; 100 mg: maximum up to 444 days)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Morphologic CR: AMLMorphologic CRi: AMLMLFs: AMLStable disease: AMLTreatment failure: AMLMarrow complete remission: MDSStable disease: MDSDisease progression: MDSTreatment failure: MDSStable disease: CMLDisease progression: CML
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 100 mg11123110000
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 25 mg00011010100
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 50 mg00011011011

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR) or CR With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi) and DMR: Combination Cohort 1

CR: neutrophils (mcL) >=1000, platelets (mcL) >=100000, bone marrow blasts (BMB) <5%. CRi: neutrophils (mcL) <1000 or platelets (mcL) <100000, BMB <5%. DMR included CR, CRi, MLFS, mCR and PR. CR: neutrophils (mcL) >=1000, platelets (mcL) >=100000, bone marrow blasts (BMB) <5%. CRi: neutrophils (mcL) <1000 or platelets (mcL) <100000, BMB <5%. MLFS: neutrophils (mcL) 1000 and platelets (mcL) <100000, BMB <5%. PR: neutrophils (mcL) >=1000, platelets (mcL) >=100000, BMB decrease to 5-25 and >=50% decrease from start. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to end of treatment (maximum up to 486 days)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
CR/CRiDMR
Combination Cohort 1 (Unfit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + LDAC 20 mg16.716.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With CR/CRi and DMR: Combination Cohort 3

CR: neutrophils (mcL) >=1000, platelets (mcL) >=100000, bone marrow blasts (BMB) <5%. CRi: neutrophils (mcL) <1000 or platelets (mcL) <100000, BMB <5%. DMR included CR, CRi, MLFS, mCR and PR. CR: neutrophils (mcL) >=1000, platelets (mcL) >=100000, bone marrow blasts (BMB) <5%. CRi: neutrophils (mcL) <1000 or platelets (mcL) <100000, BMB <5%. MLFS: neutrophils (mcL) 1000 and platelets (mcL) <100000, BMB <5%. PR: neutrophils (mcL) >=1000, platelets (mcL) >=100000, BMB decrease to 5-25 and >=50% decrease from start. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to end of treatment (maximum up to 841 days)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
CR/CriDMR
Combination Cohort 3: PF-04449913 100 mg + Azacitidine50.050.0

[back to top]

Single Dose- Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve: From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau), From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) and From Time Zero to Infinity (AUCinf) of PF-04449913 for Monotherapy Cohort

AUCtau, was determined by linear/log trapezoidal method. For AUC, tau (dosing interval) was 24 hours. AUClast = area under the curve from time zero to last quantifiable concentration. AUCinf = AUClast + (Clast/kel), where Clast = predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point estimated from the log-linear regression analysis, and where kel = terminal elimination phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: AUCtau: 0 to 24, 24 to 48, 48 to 72 hours post PF-04449913 dosing on Day -5 of Cycle 1; AUClast and AUCinf: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 hours post PF-04449913 dosing on Day -5 of Cycle 1

,,
InterventionNanogram*hour per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
AUCtauAUClastAUCinf
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 100 mg88431275013160
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 25 mg241332553374
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 50 mg449989119596

[back to top]

Time to Complete Remission (CR) or CR With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi) and DMR Response: Combination Cohort 3

The time from the date of first dose of study drug to the date of first documentation of a CR or CRi and DMR. DMR included CR, CRi, MLFS, mCR and PR. CR: neutrophils (mcL) >=1000, platelets (mcL) >=100000, bone marrow blasts (BMB) <5%. CRi: neutrophils (mcL) <1000 or platelets (mcL) <100000, BMB <5%. MLFS: neutrophils (mcL) 1000 and platelets (mcL) <100000, BMB <5%. PR: neutrophils (mcL) >=1000, platelets (mcL) >=100000, BMB decrease to 5-25 and >=50% decrease from start. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to end of treatment (maximum up to 841 days)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Time to CR/CRiTime to DMR
Combination Cohort 3: PF-04449913 100 mg + Azacitidine5.95.8

[back to top]

Time to Response: Combination Cohort 1

The time from the date of first dose of study drug to the date of first documentation of a CR or CRi and DMR. DMR included CR, CRi, MLFS, mCR and PR. CR: neutrophils (mcL) >=1000, platelets (mcL) >=100000, BMB <5%. CRi: neutrophils (mcL) <1000 or platelets (mcL) <100000, BMB <5%. MLFS: neutrophils (mcL) 1000 and platelets (mcL) <100000, BMB <5%. PR: neutrophils (mcL) >=1000, platelets (mcL) >=100000, BMB decrease to 5-25 and >=50% decrease from start. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to end of treatment (maximum up to 486 days)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Time to CR/CRiTime to DMR
Combination Cohort 1 (Unfit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + LDAC 20 mg2.10.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Worst On-study Laboratory Abnormalities: Combination Cohort 1

Laboratory parameters included- hematology: lymphocytes/leukocytes (%), neutrophils/leukocytes (%), basophils/leukocytes (%), eosinophils/leukocytes (%), monocytes/leukocytes (%), prothrombin time (sec), blasts/leukocytes (%); clinical chemistry: lactate dehydrogenase (u/l), protein (g/l), BUN (mmol/l), urate (mmol/l), chloride (mmol/l), calcium (mmol/l); urinalysis: specific gravity (scalar), pH (scalar), urine glucose (scalar), ketones (scalar), nitrite, leukocyte esterase, urine erythrocytes (scalar), urine leukocytes (scalar). In this outcome measure participants for each laboratory parameter were evaluated as normal, abnormal low only, abnormal high only or abnormal low and an abnormal high. Laboratory values were as per laboratory normal ranges. Values above normal range = abnormal high and below range = abnormal low. Participants with both an abnormal low and an abnormal high value while on study were reported as 'Abnormal low and Abnormal high'. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Baseline up to maximum 514 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Lymphocytes/Leukocytes71912645Neutrophils/Leukocytes71912645Basophils/Leukocytes71912645Eosinophils/Leukocytes71912645Monocytes/Leukocytes71912645Prothrombin time71912645Blasts/Leukocytes71912645Lactate dehydrogenase71912645Protein71912645BUN71912645Urate71912645Chloride71912645Calcium71912645Urine specific gravity71912645Urine pH71912645Urine glucose71912645Urine ketones71912645Urine nitrite71912645Urine leukocyte esterase71912645Urine erythrocytes71912645Urine leukocytes71912645
NormalAbnormal low onlyAbnormal high onlyAbnormal low and abnormal high
Combination Cohort 1 (Unfit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + LDAC 20 mg1
Combination Cohort 1 (Unfit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + LDAC 20 mg0
Combination Cohort 1 (Unfit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + LDAC 20 mg4
Combination Cohort 1 (Unfit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + LDAC 20 mg2
Combination Cohort 1 (Unfit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + LDAC 20 mg3
Combination Cohort 1 (Unfit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + LDAC 20 mg5
Combination Cohort 1 (Unfit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + LDAC 20 mg6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Worst On-study Laboratory Abnormalities: Combination Cohort 2

Laboratory parameters included- hematology: lymphocytes/leukocytes (%), neutrophils/leukocytes (%), basophils/leukocytes (%), eosinophils/leukocytes (%), monocytes/leukocytes (%), prothrombin time (sec), blasts/leukocytes (%); clinical chemistry: lactate dehydrogenase (u/l), protein (g/l), BUN (mmol/l), urate (mmol/l), chloride (mmol/l), calcium (mmol/l); urinalysis: specific gravity (scalar), pH (scalar), urine glucose (scalar), ketones (scalar), urine erythrocytes (scalar), urine leukocytes (scalar). In this outcome measure participants for each laboratory parameter were evaluated as normal, abnormal low only, abnormal high only or abnormal low and an abnormal high. Participants that had both an abnormal low and an abnormal high value while on study were reported as 'Abnormal low and Abnormal high'. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Baseline up to maximum 371 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Lymphocytes/Leukocytes71912646Neutrophils/Leukocytes71912646Basophils/Leukocytes71912646Eosinophils/Leukocytes71912646Monocytes/Leukocytes71912646Prothrombin time71912646Blasts/Leukocytes71912646Lactate dehydrogenase71912646Protein71912646BUN71912646Urate71912646Chloride71912646Calcium71912646Urine specific gravity71912646Urine pH71912646Urine glucose71912646Urine ketones71912646Urine erythrocytes71912646Urine leukocytes71912646
Abnormal low onlyAbnormal low and abnormal highNormalAbnormal high only
Combination Cohort 2 (Fit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin4
Combination Cohort 2 (Fit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin6
Combination Cohort 2 (Fit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin3
Combination Cohort 2 (Fit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin2
Combination Cohort 2 (Fit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin5
Combination Cohort 2 (Fit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin0
Combination Cohort 2 (Fit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Worst On-study Laboratory Abnormalities: Combination Cohort 3

Laboratory parameters included- hematology: lymphocytes/leukocytes (%), neutrophils/leukocytes (%), basophils/leukocytes (%), eosinophils/leukocytes (%), monocytes/leukocytes (%), blasts/leukocytes (%); clinical chemistry: lactate dehydrogenase (u/l), protein (g/l), BUN (mmol/l), urate (mmol/l), chloride (mmol/l), calcium (mmol/l); urinalysis: specific gravity (scalar), pH (scalar), urine glucose (scalar), ketones (scalar), nitrite, leukocyte esterase, urine erythrocytes (scalar), urine leukocytes (scalar). In this outcome measure participants for each laboratory parameter were evaluated as normal, abnormal low only, abnormal high only or abnormal low and an abnormal high. Participants that had both an abnormal low and an abnormal high value while on study were reported as 'Abnormal low and Abnormal high'. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Baseline up to maximum 869 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Lymphocytes/Leukocytes71912648Neutrophils/Leukocytes71912648Basophils/Leukocytes71912648Eosinophils/Leukocytes71912648Monocytes/Leukocytes71912648Blasts/Leukocytes71912648Lactate dehydrogenase71912648Protein71912648BUN71912648Urate71912648Chloride71912648Calcium71912648Urine specific gravity71912648Urine pH71912648Urine glucose71912648Urine ketones71912648Urine nitrite71912648Urine leukocyte esterase71912648Urine erythrocytes71912648Urine leukocytes71912648
Abnormal low onlyAbnormal high onlyAbnormal low and abnormal highNormal
Combination Cohort 3: PF-04449913 100 mg + Azacitidine4
Combination Cohort 3: PF-04449913 100 mg + Azacitidine3
Combination Cohort 3: PF-04449913 100 mg + Azacitidine6
Combination Cohort 3: PF-04449913 100 mg + Azacitidine5
Combination Cohort 3: PF-04449913 100 mg + Azacitidine1
Combination Cohort 3: PF-04449913 100 mg + Azacitidine0
Combination Cohort 3: PF-04449913 100 mg + Azacitidine2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Worst On-study Laboratory Abnormalities: Monotherapy Cohort

Laboratory parameters included- hematology: lymphocytes/leukocytes (%), neutrophils/leukocytes (%), basophils/leukocytes (%), eosinophils/leukocytes (%), monocytes/leukocytes (%), prothrombin time (sec), blasts/leukocytes (%); clinical chemistry: lactate dehydrogenase (u/l), protein (g/l), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (mmol/l), urate (mmol/l), chloride (mmol/l), calcium (mmol/l); urinalysis: specific gravity (scalar), pH (scalar), urine glucose (scalar), ketones (scalar), nitrite, leukocyte esterase, urine erythrocytes (scalar), urine leukocytes (scalar). In this outcome measure participants for each laboratory parameter were evaluated as normal, abnormal low only, abnormal high only or abnormal low and an abnormal high. Laboratory values were as per laboratory normal ranges. Values above normal range = abnormal high and below range = abnormal low. Participants with both an abnormal low and an abnormal high value while on study were reported as 'Abnormal low and Abnormal high'. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: For 25 mg: Baseline up to maximum 136 days; For 50 mg: Baseline up to maximum 179 days; For 100 mg: Baseline up to maximum 472 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Lymphocytes/Leukocytes71912642Lymphocytes/Leukocytes71912643Lymphocytes/Leukocytes71912644Neutrophils/Leukocytes71912642Neutrophils/Leukocytes71912643Neutrophils/Leukocytes71912644Basophils/Leukocytes71912642Basophils/Leukocytes71912643Basophils/Leukocytes71912644Eosinophils/Leukocytes71912643Eosinophils/Leukocytes71912644Eosinophils/Leukocytes71912642Monocytes/Leukocytes71912643Monocytes/Leukocytes71912644Monocytes/Leukocytes71912642Prothrombin time71912643Prothrombin time71912642Prothrombin time71912644Blasts/Leukocytes71912642Blasts/Leukocytes71912643Blasts/Leukocytes71912644Lactate dehydrogenase71912644Lactate dehydrogenase71912642Lactate dehydrogenase71912643Protein71912643Protein71912644Protein71912642BUN71912643BUN71912642BUN71912644Urate71912642Urate71912643Urate71912644Chloride71912644Chloride71912643Chloride71912642Calcium71912642Calcium71912643Calcium71912644Urine specific gravity71912642Urine specific gravity71912644Urine specific gravity71912643Urine pH71912642Urine pH71912644Urine pH71912643Urine glucose71912642Urine glucose71912644Urine glucose71912643Urine ketones71912642Urine ketones71912644Urine ketones71912643Urine nitrite71912642Urine nitrite71912643Urine nitrite71912644Urine leukocyte esterase71912642Urine leukocyte esterase71912643Urine leukocyte esterase71912644Urine erythrocytes71912642Urine erythrocytes71912644Urine erythrocytes71912643Urine leukocytes71912642Urine leukocytes71912643Urine leukocytes71912644
NormalAbnormal low onlyAbnormal high onlyAbnormal low and abnormal high
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 25 mg2
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 100 mg2
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 50 mg2
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 100 mg4
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 100 mg0
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 25 mg1
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 100 mg1
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 25 mg3
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 50 mg4
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 100 mg5
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 25 mg0
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 100 mg3
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 50 mg3
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 50 mg0
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 50 mg1

[back to top]

Single Dose- Clearance (CL/F) of PF-04449913: Monotherapy Cohort

CL/F was defined as apparent total clearance of the drug from plasma after oral administration. CL/F of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. CL/F obtained after oral dose (apparent oral clearance) is influenced by the fraction of the dose absorbed. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 hours post PF-04449913 dosing on Day -5 of Cycle 1

InterventionLiter per hour (Geometric Mean)
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 25 mg7.415
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 50 mg5.210
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 100 mg7.599

[back to top] [back to top]

Multiple Dose- Accumulation Ratio (Rac) of PF-04449913: Monotherapy Cohort

Rac was the observed accumulation ratio for AUCtau, determined as ratio of Day 21 AUCtau to Day -5 AUCtau. AUCtau, was determined by linear/log trapezoidal method. For AUC, tau (dosing interval) was 24 hours. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: 0 to 24, 24 to 48, 48 to 72 hours post PF-04449913 dosing on Day -5 and Day 21 of Cycle 1

InterventionRatio (Geometric Mean)
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 25 mg1.893
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 50 mg2.076
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 100 mg1.752

[back to top]

Multiple Dose- AUCtau of Daunorubicinol: Combination Cohort 2

Daunorubicinol was a metabolite of daunorubicin. AUCtau, was determined by linear/log trapezoidal method. For AUC, tau (dosing interval) was 24 hours. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: 0 to 24 hours post daunorubicin dosing on Day 3 of induction Cycle 1

InterventionNanogram*hour per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Combination Cohort 2 (Fit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin2800

[back to top]

Multiple Dose- AUCtau of PF-04449913: Monotherapy Cohort

AUCtau, was determined by linear/log trapezoidal method. For AUC, tau (dosing interval) was 24 hours. AUClast = area under the curve from time zero to last quantifiable concentration. AUCinf = AUClast + (Clast/kel), where Clast = predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point estimated from the log-linear regression analysis, and where kel = terminal elimination phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours post PF-04449913 dosing Day 21 of Cycle 1

InterventionNanogram*hour per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 25 mg4561
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 50 mg9299
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 100 mg15480

[back to top]

Multiple Dose- Clearance (CL/F) of PF-04449913: Monotherapy Cohort

CL/F was defined as apparent total clearance of the drug from plasma after oral administration. CL/F of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. CL/F obtained after oral dose (apparent oral clearance) is influenced by the fraction of the dose absorbed. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours post PF-04449913 dosing Day 21 of Cycle 1

InterventionLiter per hour (Geometric Mean)
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 25 mg5.467
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 50 mg5.369
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 100 mg6.452

[back to top]

Multiple Dose- Steady State Accumulation Ratio (Rss) of PF-04449913: Monotherapy Cohort

Rss = Ratio of Day 21 AUCtau to Day -5 AUCinf. AUCinf = AUClast + (Clast/kel), where Clast = predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point estimated from the log-linear regression analysis, and where kel = terminal elimination phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve. AUCtau, was determined by linear/log trapezoidal method. For AUC, tau (dosing interval) was 24 hours. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: AUCtau: 0 to 24, 24 to 48, 48 to 72 hours post PF-04449913 dosing on Day 21 of Cycle 1; AUCinf: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 hours post PF-04449913 dosing on Day -5 of Cycle 1

InterventionRatio (Geometric Mean)
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 25 mg1.355
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 50 mg1.017
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 100 mg1.176

[back to top]

Multiple Dose- T1/2 of Daunorubicin: Combination Cohort 2

Terminal plasma half-life is the time required to divide the plasma concentration by two after reaching pseudo-equilibrium (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.25 (mid-infusion), 0.5 (immediately prior to end of infusion), 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post daunorubicin dosing on Day 3 of at induction Cycle 1

InterventionHours (Mean)
Combination Cohort 2 (Fit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin7.297

[back to top]

Multiple Dose- Tmax of Daunorubicin: Combination Cohort 2

(NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.25 (mid-infusion), 0.5 (immediately prior to end of infusion), 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post daunorubicin dosing on Day 3 of induction Cycle 1

InterventionHours (Median)
Combination Cohort 2 (Fit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin0.3585

[back to top]

Multiple Dose- Tmax of Daunorubicinol: Combination Cohort 2

Daunorubicinol was a metabolite of daunorubicin. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.25 (mid-infusion), 0.5 (immediately prior to end of infusion), 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post daunorubicin dosing on Day 3 of induction Cycle 1

InterventionHours (Median)
Combination Cohort 2 (Fit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin0.3585

[back to top]

Multiple Dose- Tmax of PF-04449913: Monotherapy Cohort

(NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours post PF-04449913 dosing on Day 21 of Cycle 1

InterventionHours (Median)
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 25 mg3.970
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 50 mg4.000
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 100 mg1.950

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs Abnormalities: Combination Cohort 1

Vital signs included blood pressure (sitting or supine) and heart rate. Clinically significant changes in vital signs were determined by the investigator's discretion. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Baseline up to maximum 486 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combination Cohort 1 (Unfit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + LDAC 20 mg0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs Abnormalities: Combination Cohort 2

Vital signs included blood pressure (sitting or supine) and heart rate. Clinically significant changes in vital signs were determined by the investigator's discretion. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Baseline up to maximum 343 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combination Cohort 2 (Fit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs Abnormalities: Combination Cohort 3

Vital signs included blood pressure (sitting or supine) and heart rate. Clinically significant changes in vital signs were determined by the investigator's discretion. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Baseline up to maximum 841 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combination Cohort 3: PF-04449913 100 mg + Azacitidine0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs Abnormalities: Monotherapy Cohort

Vital signs included blood pressure (sitting or supine) and heart rate. Clinically significant changes in vital signs were determined by the investigator's discretion. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: For 25 mg: Baseline up to maximum 108 days; For 50 mg: Baseline up to maximum 151 days; For 100 mg: Baseline up to maximum 444 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 25 mg0
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 50 mg0
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 100 mg0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With DLTs: Combination Cohort 1

Criteria: Grade >=3 non-hematologic toxicity (nht), except Grade >=3 infection, fever (including febrile neutropenia), infusion related AEs, electrolyte abnormalities, alanine aminotransferase (AT)/aspartate AT elevation that returned to Grade <=1/baseline within 7 days, allergic reactions possibly related to PF-04449913 that led to discontinuation of study drug; Prolonged myelosuppression lasted >42 days from point of detection = absolute neutrophil count < 500/microliter or platelet count <10*10^9/L with a normal bone marrow (<5% blasts and no evidence of disease or dysplasia); Inability to deliver >=80% of the planned study doses for all agents in a combination due to nht; Delay of >28 days in receiving next scheduled cycle due to persisting nht; Asymptomatic participant with Grade >=3 QTc prolongation required repeat testing, re-evaluation by qualified person, and correction of reversible causes for confirmation. Post-correction, if Grade 3 prolongation persisted, event was a DLT. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to Day 28 of Cycle 1 (28 days)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combination Cohort 1 (Unfit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + LDAC 20 mg0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With DLTs: Combination Cohort 2

Criteria: Grade >=3 non-hematologic toxicity (nht), except Grade >=3 infection, fever (including febrile neutropenia), infusion related AEs, electrolyte abnormalities, alanine aminotransferase (AT)/aspartate AT elevation that returned to Grade <=1/baseline within 7 days, allergic reactions possibly related to PF-04449913 that led to discontinuation of study drug; Prolonged myelosuppression lasted >42 days from point of detection = absolute neutrophil count < 500/microliter or platelet count <10*10^9/L with a normal bone marrow (<5% blasts and no evidence of disease or dysplasia); Inability to deliver >=80% of the planned study doses for all agents in a combination due to nht; Delay of >28 days in receiving next scheduled cycle due to persisting nht; Asymptomatic participant with Grade >=3 QTc prolongation required repeat testing, re-evaluation by qualified person, and correction of reversible causes for confirmation. Post-correction, if Grade 3 prolongation persisted, event was a DLT. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Day -3 up to anytime between Day 21 and Day 28 of first induction cycle (24 to 31 days)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combination Cohort 2 (Fit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With DLTs: Combination Cohort 3

Criteria: Grade >=3 non-hematologic toxicity (nht), except Grade >=3 infection, fever (including febrile neutropenia), infusion related AEs, electrolyte abnormalities, alanine aminotransferase (AT)/aspartate AT elevation that returned to Grade <=1/baseline within 7 days, allergic reactions possibly related to PF-04449913 that led to discontinuation of study drug; Prolonged myelosuppression lasted >42 days from point of detection = absolute neutrophil count < 500/microliter or platelet count <10*10^9/L with a normal bone marrow (<5% blasts and no evidence of disease or dysplasia); Inability to deliver >=80% of the planned study doses for all agents in a combination due to nht; Delay of >28 days in receiving next scheduled cycle due to persisting nht; Asymptomatic participant with Grade >=3 QTc prolongation required repeat testing, re-evaluation by qualified person, and correction of reversible causes for confirmation. Post-correction, if Grade 3 prolongation persisted, event was a DLT. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to Day 28 of Cycle 1 (28 days)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combination Cohort 3: PF-04449913 100 mg + Azacitidine0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs): Monotherapy Cohort

Criteria: Grade >=3 non-hematologic toxicity (nht), except Grade >=3 infection, fever (including febrile neutropenia), infusion related AEs, electrolyte abnormalities, alanine aminotransferase (AT)/aspartate AT elevation that returned to Grade <=1/baseline within 7 days, allergic reactions possibly related to PF-04449913 that led to discontinuation of study drug; Prolonged myelosuppression lasted >42 days from point of detection = absolute neutrophil count < 500/microliter or platelet count <10*10^9/L with a normal bone marrow (<5% blasts and no evidence of disease or dysplasia); Inability to deliver >=80% of the planned study doses for all agents in a combination due to nht; Delay of >28 days in receiving next scheduled cycle due to persisting nht; Asymptomatic participant with Grade >=3 QTc prolongation required repeat testing, re-evaluation by qualified person, and correction of reversible causes for confirmation. Post-correction, if Grade 3 prolongation persisted, event was a DLT. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Day -5 up to Day 28 of Cycle 1 (33 days)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 25 mg0
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 50 mg0
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 100 mg0

[back to top]

Overall Survival: Combination Cohort 1

Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study drug to the date of death due to any cause. Participants last known to be alive were censored at the date of last contact. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: First dose of study drug up to death or date of last contact (maximum up to 514 days)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Combination Cohort 1 (Unfit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + LDAC 20 mg11.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Disease Modifying Response (DMR): Expansion Cohort

DMR included complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete blood count recovery (Cri), morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS), marrow CR (mCR) and partial remission (PR). CR: >=11 gram per deciliter (g/dL) hemoglobin (Hgb), >=1*10^9 neutrophils (L), >=100*10^9 platelets (L), 0% blasts, <=5% bone marrow blasts (BMB), normal maturation of all cell lines, if had persistent dysplasia. . CRi: <1000 neutrophils (mcL), <100000 platelets (mcL), <5% BMB, either neutrophils or platelets not recovered, no extramedullary disease (EMD). MLFS: 1000 neutrophils (mcL) and <100000 platelets (mcL), <5% BMB, neutrophils and platelets not recovered, flow cytometry negative, no EMD. PR: >=1000 neutrophils (mcL), >=100000 platelets (mcL), decrease to 5-25 and >=50% decrease from start, Blasts <=5% if Auer rod positive. mCR: hematologic improvement (HI) response, <=5% and decreased by >=50% BMB. PR: decrease by >=50% but still >5% BMB. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Baseline up to maximum 736 days

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Expansion Cohort (Unfit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg+ LDAC 20 mg46.7

[back to top]

Single Dose- Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of PF-04449913: Monotherapy Cohort

(NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 hours post PF-04449913 dosing on Day -5 of Cycle 1

Interventionnanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 25 mg281.5
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 50 mg321.1
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 100 mg1019

[back to top]

Single Dose- Terminal Plasma Half-life (T1/2) of PF-04449913: Monotherapy Cohort

Terminal plasma half-life is the time required to divide the plasma concentration by two after reaching pseudo-equilibrium. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 hours post PF-04449913 dosing on Day -5 of Cycle 1

InterventionHours (Mean)
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 25 mg17.83
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 50 mg30.70
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 100 mg18.67

[back to top]

Single Dose- Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of PF-04449913: Monotherapy Cohort

(NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 hours post PF-04449913 dosing on Day -5 of Cycle 1

InterventionHours (Median)
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 25 mg1.970
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 50 mg3.955
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 100 mg1.950

[back to top]

Single Dose- Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of PF-04449913: Monotherapy Cohort

Vz/F was defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired blood concentration of a drug. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 hours post PF-04449913 dosing on Day -5 of Cycle 1

InterventionLiter (Geometric Mean)
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 25 mg190.5
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 50 mg227.8
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 100 mg201.5

[back to top]

Duration of Complete Remission (CR) or CR With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi) and DMR Response: Combination Cohort 1

Duration of response was the time from the date of first documentation of a CR/CRi and DMR to the date of first documentation of relapse after CR/CRi and DMR or death due to any cause. Duration of response data was censored on the date of the last adequate response assessment for patients who do not have an event (relapse or death). DMR included CR, CRi, MLFS, mCR and PR. CR: neutrophils (mcL) >=1000, platelets (mcL) >=100000, bone marrow blasts (BMB) <5%. CRi: neutrophils (mcL) <1000 or platelets (mcL) <100000, BMB <5%. MLFS: neutrophils (mcL) 1000 and platelets (mcL) <100000, BMB <5%. PR: neutrophils (mcL) >=1000, platelets (mcL) >=100000, BMB decrease to 5-25 and >=50% decrease from start. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to end of treatment (maximum up to 486 days)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Duration of CR/CRiDuration of DMR
Combination Cohort 1 (Unfit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + LDAC 20 mg13.915.3

[back to top]

Duration of Complete Remission (CR) or CR With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi) and DMR Response: Combination Cohort 3

Duration of response was the time from the date of first documentation of a CR/CRi and DMR to the date of first documentation of relapse after CR/CRi and DMR or death due to any cause. Duration of response data was censored on the date of the last adequate response assessment for patients who do not have an event (relapse or death). DMR included CR, CRi, MLFS, mCR and PR. CR: neutrophils (mcL) >=1000, platelets (mcL) >=100000, bone marrow blasts (BMB) <5%. CRi: neutrophils (mcL) <1000 or platelets (mcL) <100000, BMB <5%. MLFS: neutrophils (mcL) 1000 and platelets (mcL) <100000, BMB <5%. PR: neutrophils (mcL) >=1000, platelets (mcL) >=100000, BMB decrease to 5-25 and >=50% decrease from start. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to end of treatment (maximum up to 841 days)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Duration of CR/CRiDuration of DMR
Combination Cohort 3: PF-04449913 100 mg + Azacitidine6.66.6

[back to top]

Multiple Dose Cmax, Minimum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmin), Average Observed Plasma Concentration (Cavg), Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of PF-04449913: Monotherapy Cohort

Cmax = Maximum plasma concentration, observed directly from data. Cmin = Minimum plasma concentration observed directly from data. Cavg = Average plasma concentration over the dosing interval, dosing interval was of 24 hours. Ctrough = Pre-dose concentration, observed directly from data. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Cmax, Cmin: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours post PF-04449913 dosing on Day 21 of Cycle 1; Cavg: 0 to 24, 24 to 48, 48 to 72 hours post PF-04449913 dosing on Day 21 of Cycle 1; Ctrough: Pre-dose on Day 21 of Cycle 1

,,
InterventionNanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
CmaxCminCavgCtrough
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 100 mg1330333.9645.8342.9
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 25 mg356.984.94190.587.87
Monotherapy Cohort: PF-04449913 50 mg542.2237.2388.1240.0

[back to top]

Multiple Dose- AUCinf and AUCtau of Cytarabine: Combination Cohort 1

LDAC= low dose ara-cytarabine/low dose cytarabine. AUCinf = AUClast + (Clast/kel), where Clast = predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point estimated from the log-linear regression analysis, and where kel = terminal elimination phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve. AUCtau, was determined by linear/log trapezoidal method. For AUC, tau (dosing interval) was 12 hours. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: AUCinf: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post LDAC dosing on Day 2 and Day 10 of Cycle 1; AUCtau: 0 to 12 hours post LDAC dosing on Day 2 and Day 10 of Cycle

InterventionNanogram*hour per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
AUCinf: Cycle 1/Day 2AUCtau: Cycle 1/Day 2AUCinf: Cycle 1/Day 10AUCtau: Cycle 1/Day 10
Combination Cohort 1 (Unfit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + LDAC 20 mg78.3777.9797.3497.58

[back to top]

Multiple Dose- AUCinf and AUCtau of Daunorubicin: Combination Cohort 2

AUCinf = AUClast + (Clast/kel), where Clast = predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point estimated from the log-linear regression analysis, and where kel = terminal elimination phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve. AUCtau, was determined by linear/log trapezoidal method. For AUC, tau (dosing interval) was 24 hours. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: AUCinf: Pre-dose, 0.25 (mid-infusion), 0.5 (immediately prior to end of infusion), 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post daunorubicin dosing on Day 3 of induction Cycle 1; AUCtau: 0 to 24 hours post daunorubicin dosing on Day 3 of induction Cycle 1

InterventionNanogram*hour per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
AUCinfAUCtau
Combination Cohort 2 (Fit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin770.4741.6

[back to top]

Multiple Dose- AUCtau and AUCinf of Azacitidine: Combination Cohort 3

AUCtau, was determined by linear/log trapezoidal method. For AUC, tau (dosing interval) was 24 hours. AUCinf = AUClast + (Clast/kel), where Clast = predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point estimated from the log-linear regression analysis, and where kel = terminal elimination phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: AUCinf: 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 6 hours post azacitidine dosing at Day 1 of Cycle 1 and pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 6 hours post azacitidine dosing at 7 of Cycle 1; AUCtau: 0 to 24 hours post azacitidine dosing on Day 1 and 7 of Cycle 1

InterventionNanogram*hour per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
AUCtau: Cycle 1/Day 1AUCinf: Cycle 1/Day 1AUCtau: Cycle 1/Day 7AUCinf: Cycle 1/Day 7
Combination Cohort 3: PF-04449913 100 mg + Azacitidine1200910.912411200

[back to top]

Multiple Dose- AUCtau of PF-04449913: Combination Cohort 1

AUCtau was determined by linear/log trapezoidal method. For AUC, tau (dosing interval) was 24 hours. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: 0 to 24 hours post PF-04449913 dose on Day 10 and Day 21 of Cycle 1

InterventionNanogram*hour per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1/Day 10Cycle 1/Day 21
Combination Cohort 1 (Unfit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + LDAC 20 mg1556016070

[back to top]

Multiple Dose- AUCtau of PF-04449913: Combination Cohort 2

AUCtau, was determined by linear/log trapezoidal method. For AUC, tau (dosing interval) was 24 hours. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 6, and 24 hours post PF-04449913 dosing on Day 3 of induction Cycle 1 and pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 4, 6, and 24 hours post PF-04449913 dosing on Day 10 of induction Cycle 1

InterventionNanogram*hour per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1/Day 3Cycle 1/Day 10
Combination Cohort 2 (Fit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin1563018120

[back to top]

Multiple Dose- AUCtau of PF-04449913: Combination Cohort 3

AUCtau, was determined by linear/log trapezoidal method. For AUC, tau (dosing interval) was 24 hours. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: 0 to 24 hours post PF-04449913 dosing on Day 7 and Day 21 of Cycle 1

InterventionNanogram*hour per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1/Day 7Cycle 1/Day 21
Combination Cohort 3: PF-04449913 100 mg + Azacitidine2001016860

[back to top]

Multiple Dose- CL/F of PF-04449913: Combination Cohort 1

CL/F was defined as apparent total clearance of the drug from plasma after oral administration. CL/F of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. CL/F obtained after oral dose (apparent oral clearance) is influenced by the fraction of the dose absorbed. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post PF-04449913 dose on Day 10 and Day 21 of Cycle 1

InterventionLiter per hour (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1/Day 10Cycle 1/Day 21
Combination Cohort 1 (Unfit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + LDAC 20 mg6.4286.223

[back to top]

Multiple Dose- CL/F of PF-04449913: Combination Cohort 2

CL/F was defined as apparent total clearance of the drug from plasma after oral administration. CL/F of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. CL/F obtained after oral dose (apparent oral clearance) is influenced by the fraction of the dose absorbed. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 6, and 24 hours post PF-04449913 dosing on Day 3 of induction Cycle 1 and pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 4, 6, and 24 hours post PF-04449913 dosing on Day 10 of induction Cycle 1

InterventionLiter per hour (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1/Day 3Cycle 1/Day 10
Combination Cohort 2 (Fit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin6.4015.523

[back to top]

Multiple Dose- CL/F of PF-04449913: Combination Cohort 3

CL/F was defined as apparent total clearance of the drug from plasma after oral administration. CL/F of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. CL/F obtained after oral dose (apparent oral clearance) is influenced by the fraction of the dose absorbed. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.25, 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post PF-04449913 dosing on Day 7 and Day 21 of Cycle 1

InterventionLiter per hour (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1/Day 7Cycle 1/Day 21
Combination Cohort 3: PF-04449913 100 mg + Azacitidine4.9995.936

[back to top]

Multiple Dose- Cmax, Cmin, and Ctrough of Ara-uridine: Combination Cohort 1

Ara-uridine was a metabolite of cytarabine. Cmax = Maximum plasma concentration, observed directly from data. Cmin = Minimum plasma concentration observed directly from data. Cavg = Average plasma concentration over the dosing interval, dosing interval was of 12 hours. Ctrough = Pre-dose concentration, observed directly from data. Ara-uridine was a metabolite of cytarabine. (NCT02038777)
Timeframe: Cmax, Cmin: Pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post LDAC dosing on Day 2 and Day 10 of Cycle 1; Cavg: 0 to 12 hours post LDAC dosing on Day 2 and Day 10 of Cycle 1; Ctrough: Pre-LDAC dosing on Day 2 and Day 10 of Cycle 1

InterventionNanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Cmax: Cycle 1/Day 2Cmin: Cycle 1/Day 2Ctrough: Cycle 1/Day 2Cmax: Cycle 1/Day 10Cmin: Cycle 1/Day 10Ctrough: Cycle 1/Day 10
Combination Cohort 1 (Unfit Participants): PF-04449913 100 mg + LDAC 20 mg371.6141.9141.9454.3201.7201.7

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death or date last known alive. (NCT02085408)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months for 4 years and then every 6 months for 1 year

Interventionmonths (Median)
A (Step 1:Daunorubicin/Cytarabine; Step 2:Cytarabine; Step 3: Observation/Decitabine/Transplant)12.9
B (Step 1: Clofarabine; Step 2: Clofarabine; Step 3: Observation/Decitabine/Transplant)11.6

[back to top]

Overall Survival by Donor Status

Overall survival is defined as time between achieving leukemia-free state after induction therapy to death from any cause or date last known alive. The association between overall survival and donor status was evaluated regardless of assigned treatment arms. Patients with transplant donor information (either had donor or did not have a donor) reported after achieving CR/Cri/leukemia-free state post induction therapy were included in this analysis. (NCT02085408)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months for 4 years and then every 6 months for 1 year

Interventionmonths (Median)
With Transplant Donor27.2
Without Transplant Donor12.9

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With Complete Remission

"Patients are required to have all of the following to be considered as having a completion remission (CR).~Peripheral Blood Counts~Neutrophil count > 1.0 x 10^9 /L~Platelet count ≥ 100 x 10^9 /L~Reduced hemoglobin concentration or hematocrit has no bearing on remission status~Leukemic blasts must not be present in the peripheral blood~Bone Marrow Aspirate and Biopsy~Cellularity of bone marrow biopsy must be > 20% with maturation of all cell lines~< 5% blasts by morphologic review~Auer rods must not be detectable~Extramedullary leukemia, such as CNS or soft tissue involvement, must not be present" (NCT02085408)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months for 4 years and then every 6 months for 1 year

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
A (Step 1:Daunorubicin/Cytarabine; Step 2:Cytarabine; Step 3: Observation/Decitabine/Transplant)0.446
B (Step 1: Clofarabine; Step 2: Clofarabine; Step 3: Observation/Decitabine/Transplant)0.453

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival for Maintenance

DFS for maintenance comparison is defined as the time from maintenance randomization until relapse or death of any cause. The censored follow-up time for patients without relapse and death information is the date of last contact. Only patients who remained in CR or CRi after completion of consolidation therapy that were randomized to either observation or decitabine in the maintenance Step were included in this analysis. (NCT02085408)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months for 4 years and then every 6 months for 1 year

Interventionmonths (Median)
Maintenance : Observation8.2
Maintenance : Decitabine16.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Complete Response

Complete Response = Complete Remission (CR) + Complete Remission without blood count recovery (CRi) - CR: Neutrophil count >/= 1.0 x 10^9/L and platelet count >/= 100 x 10^9/L, and normal bone marrow differential (NCT02096055)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years, 3 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Guadecitabine) x 5 Days5
Arm II (CLOSED) (Guadecitabine) x 10 Days5
Arm III (Guadecitabine, Idarubicin)10
Arm IV (CLOSED) (Guadecitabine, Cladribine)0

[back to top]

Leukemia-free Survival

Survival time will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The two-sided log-rank test will be used to assess the differences of time to events between groups. Time from date of treatment start until the date of first objective documentation of disease-relapse. (NCT02096055)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years, 3 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm I (Guadecitabine) x 5 Days4.2
Arm II (CLOSED) (Guadecitabine) x 10 Days10.0
Arm III (Guadecitabine, Idarubicin)7.4
Arm IV (CLOSED) (Guadecitabine, Cladribine)4.3

[back to top]

Remission Duration

The date of Complete Response to the date of loss of response or last follow-up. (NCT02096055)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years, 3 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm I (Guadecitabine) x 5 Days7.4
Arm II (CLOSED) (Guadecitabine) x 10 Days14.2
Arm III (Guadecitabine, Idarubicin)5.3

[back to top]

Survival

Survival time will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The two-sided log-rank test will be used to assess the differences of time to events between groups. (NCT02096055)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years, 3 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm I (Guadecitabine) x 5 Days13.1
Arm II (CLOSED) (Guadecitabine) x 10 Days13.0
Arm III (Guadecitabine, Idarubicin)15.4
Arm IV (CLOSED) (Guadecitabine, Cladribine)11.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Most Frequently Reports Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Event.

The most frequently reported adverse events will be determined by the Principal Investigator. The number of participants who experienced the most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events will be reported. (NCT02096055)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years, 3 months

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Infection/SepsisFebrile NeutropeniaFatigue
Arm I (Guadecitabine) x 5 Days450
Arm II (CLOSED) (Guadecitabine) x 10 Days820
Arm III (Guadecitabine, Idarubicin)843
Arm IV (CLOSED) (Guadecitabine, Cladribine)990

[back to top]

Best Disease Response From Central Review (ITT)

Best disease response is categorized as complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), or marrow CR, stable disease, disease progression, or as non-evaluable; according to modified 2006 International Working Group (IWG) criteria for MDS (NCT02158936)
Timeframe: At end of Cycle 6 (cycle=28 days) or end of therapy, whichever came first

,
Interventionparticipant (Number)
Complete response - CRMarrow complete responsePartial response - PRStable diseaseProgressive diseaseNot evaluableOverall Response (CR+Marrow+PR)
Eltrombopag112223242615
Placebo75731173819

[back to top]

Summary of Progression Free Survival From Investigator Assessment (ITT)

Progression-free survival, defined as the time from randomization until either disease progression or death. The modified 2006 IWG criteria for MDS used for progression assessment For patients with: Less than 5% BM blasts: ≥ 50% increase in blasts to > 5% blasts; 5% - <10% BM blasts: ≥ 50% increase to > 10% blasts; 10% - <20% BM blasts: ≥ 50% increase to > 20% blasts; 20% - 30% BM blasts: ≥ 50% increase to > 30% blasts (NCT02158936)
Timeframe: First day of each cycle (Cycles 3+), at the end of therapy visit and every 3 months in follow-up for approximately 2 years

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
DeathDisease progression
Eltrombopag3438
Placebo3630

[back to top]

Bleeding Adverse Events (AEs) >= Grade 3

Bleeding will be assessed by recording AEs or serious adverse events (SAEs) as graded according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0 (NCT02158936)
Timeframe: From Day 1 to 4-week follow-up up to approximately 2 years

,
Interventionparticipant (Number)
Any event - Grade 3Any event - Grade 4Any event - Grade 5
Eltrombopag921
Placebo1224

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Chronic Disease Therapy-fatigue Subscale (FACIT-Fatigue) (ITT)

"The FACIT-Fatigue subscale measures severity and impact of fatigue on functioning and Health Related QoL experienced in the past 7 days. Scale is a 13 item measure of fatigure. Items are scored on a 0-4 response scale ranging from not at all to very much so. All items are summed to create a single fatigure score with a range from 0 to 52. Items are reverse scored when appropriate to provide a scale in which higher scores represent better functioning or less fatiigue (The FACIT Fatigue Scale is owned by David Cella, Ph.D.)" (NCT02158936)
Timeframe: From Day 1 to 4-week follow-up (Approximate median 9 Cycles+4 weeks follow-up) up to approximately 2 years

,
Interventionscores (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1 (175,172)Week 4 Follow-up (68,70)
Eltrombopag17.40116.669
Placebo15.95114.898

[back to top]

Hematologic Improvement (HI) in Platelets, Neutrophils, and Hemoglobin Based on the Modified IWG Criteria for MDS (ITT)

HI based on the modified IWG criteria for MDS. HI - Platelets (BL <100Gi/L), response criteria= BL <20: increase to>20 and 100% at least for 56 days or BL >=20: absolute increase of >=30. HI - Neutrophils (BL <1.0 Gi/L), response criteria=100% increase and an absolute increase >0.5 Gi/L over BL for at least 56 days. HI-Hemoglobin (BL =1.5 g/dL over BL, RBC transfusions(given for Hgb<=9.0) reduced by >=4 per 8w from BL (NCT02158936)
Timeframe: From Day 1 to 4-week follow-up (samples collected weekly in Cycle 1, Days 1 and 15 in Cycles 2-6 and Day 1 of Cycles >=7)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
PlateletsNeutrophilsHemoglobinPlatelets and neutrophilsPlatelets and hemoglobinNeutrophils and hemoglobinPlatelets, neutrophils and hemoglobin
Eltrombopag5612110111
Placebo5713111111

[back to top]

Medical Resource Utilization (MRU): Event -Hospitalizations Inpatient and Outpatient

MRU data will be collected for each subject. Events corresponding to unscheduled (not scheduled per protocol) hospitalizations (NCT02158936)
Timeframe: From Day 1 to 4-week follow-up (Approximate median 9 Cycles+4 weeks follow-up) up to approximately 2 years

,
Interventiondays (Mean)
In-patient hospitalizations - entire study (91,66)Out-patient hospitalizations - entire study (4,2)
Eltrombopag23.99.5
Placebo27.12.5

[back to top]

Medical Resource Utilization (MRU): Use of Site Specific Medical Resources

MRU data will be collected for each subject. Events corresponding to unscheduled (not scheduled per protocol) hospitalizations, office visits including consultations, laboratory and diagnostic tests (lab results, imaging etc.), and procedures prior to therapy initiation and during therapy will be collected (NCT02158936)
Timeframe: From Day 1 to 4-week follow-up (Approximate median 9 Cycles+4 weeks follow-up) up to approximately 2 years

,
Interventionvisits (Number)
Medical or surgical specialist visitsHome healthcare visits by medical professionalPrimary physician care visitsNurse practitioner, physic assistant, nurse visitsTelephone consultationsEmergency visits not resulting in hospital stay
Eltrombopag498989898989
Placebo589797979797

[back to top]

Number of of Subjects With Azacitidine Dose Delays, Dose Reductions, Interruptions

The proportion of subjects with any delay, reduction or interruption in dosage of Azacitidine excluding those for non-medical reasons will be analyzed (NCT02158936)
Timeframe: From Day 1 to 4-week follow-up up to approximately 2 years

,
Interventionparticipant (Number)
Overall dose delayOverall dose reductionOverall dose interruption
Eltrombopag8273
Placebo881613

[back to top]

Best Disease Response From Investigator Assessment (ITT)

Best disease response is categorized as complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), or marrow CR, stable disease, disease progression, or as non-evaluable; according to modified 2006 International Working Group (IWG) criteria for MDS (NCT02158936)
Timeframe: At end of Cycle 6 (cycle=28 days) or end of therapy, whichever came first

,
Interventionparticipant (Number)
Complete response - CRMarrow complete responsePartial response - PRStable diseaseProgressive diseaseNot evaluableOverall Response (CR+Marrow+PR
Eltrombopag1581350223236
Placebo2614224783362

[back to top]

Summary of Post-Hoc Estimates of Steady-state Eltrombopag AUC0 Infinity Pharmacokinetic Parameters for a 50 mg Dose

Eltrombopag concentrations were analyzed using a population PK model along with data from other studies in healthy volunteers and in patients with MDS and/or AML. Post-hoc PK parameters were derived. Only patients from this study were included (163) (NCT02158936)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Week 2: Pre-dose, 1.5 and 3 hour post dose; Cycle 1, Week 3: 4, 5.5, and 7 hours post dose

Interventionhr.μg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Eltrombopag135

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization until death due to any cause and deaths have been presented. Subjects still alive at the time of the analysis and subjects who have withdrawn from the study will be censored at the time of last contact (NCT02158936)
Timeframe: Randomization until death or end of study, approximately 2 years

Interventiondeaths (events) (Number)
Eltrombopag57
Placebo51

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Were Platelet Transfusion Independent (ITT Set)

Platelet transfusion independence is defined for each cycle as the number of participants who continue to the end of a cycle without requiring a platelet transfusion (NCT02158936)
Timeframe: From Day 1 to end of study treatment up to approximately 2 years

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Screening (179,177)Cycle 1 (175,173)Cycle 2 (135,158)Cycle 3 (105,131)Cycle 4 (93,116)Cycle 5 (76,108)Cycle 6 (65,90)Cycle 7 (47,74)Cycle 8 (37,61)Cycle 9 (28,46)Cycle 10 (23,38)Cycle 11 (19,29)Cycle 12 (15,21)Cycle 13 (12,16)Cycle 14 (6,11)Cycle 15 (3,5)Cycle 16 (0,3)Cycle 17 (0,3)
Eltrombopag12768626858494129201918131073200
Placebo121878794917662504236282015106330

[back to top]

Medical Resource Utilization (MRU): Event and Use of Site Specific Medical Resources - Non-study Laboratory Tests

MRU data will be collected for each subject. Events corresponding to unscheduled (not scheduled per protocol) hospitalizations, office visits including consultations, laboratory and diagnostic tests (lab results, imaging etc.), and procedures prior to therapy initiation and during therapy will be collected (NCT02158936)
Timeframe: From Day 1 to 4-week follow-up (Approximate median 9 Cycles+4 weeks follow-up) up to approximately 2 years

Interventiontests (Number)
Eltrombopag88
Placebo105

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Were Platelet Transfusion Independent During Cycles 1-4 of Azacitidine Therapy

A subject is defined as being platelet transfusion independent if they received no platelet transfusions within the first 4 cycles of treatment with azacitidine. Subjects who died or withdrew from investigational product within the first four cycles were treated as failures (i.e. not transfusion independent) in the analysis (NCT02158936)
Timeframe: 4 cycles (Cycle = 28 days)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Yes - platelet transfusion independentNo - platelet transfusion independent
Eltrombopag28151
Placebo55122

[back to top]

Response Levels in All Domains of Euroquol-5 Dimensions of Health, 3 Response Levels (EQ-5D-3L™)

The EQ-5D is a general health status and health utility measure which captures 5 dimensions of health state: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. (EQ-5D is a trademark of the Stichting EuroQol Group) . C=cycle, D=Day (NCT02158936)
Timeframe: From Day 1 to 4-week follow-up up to approximately 2 years

,
Interventionparticipant (Number)
Mobility C1, D1 (176, 173) L1- no problem walkingMobility C1,D1 (176, 173) L2- some problem walkingMobility C1, D1 (176,173) L3- confined to bedMobility Wk 4 FU (71,72) L1- no problem walkingMobility Wk 4 FU (71,72) L2- some problem walkingMobility Wk 4 FU (71,72) L3- confined to bedSelf-Care C1, D1 (176,173) L1-no problemsSelf-Care C1, D1 (176,173) L2-some problemsSelf-Care C1, D1 (176,173) L3-unable toSelf-Care Wk4 FU (71,72) L1-no problemsSelf-Care Wk4 FU(71,72) L2-some problemsSelf-Care Wk4 FU (71,72) L2-unable to wash/dressUsual activities C1,D1(175,173) L1-no problemUsual activities C1,D1(175,173) L2-some problemUsual activities C1,D1(175,173) L3-unable toUsual activities Wk4 FU (71,72) L1-no problemUsual activities Wk4 FU (71,72) L1-some problemUsual activities Wk4 FU (71,72) L3-unable toPain/discomfort C1,D1(176,173) L1-nonePain/discomfort C1,D1(176,173) L2-moderatePain/discomfort C1,D1(176,173) L3-extremePain/discomfort Wk4 FU (71,72) L1-nonePain/discomfort Wk4 FU (71,72) L2-moderatePain/discomfort Wk4 FU (71,72) L3-extremeAnxiety/depression C1 D1(176,173) L1-noneAnxiety/depression C1 D1(176,173) L2-moderatelyAnxiety/depression C1 D1(176,173) L3-extremelyAnxiety/depression Wk4 FU(71,72) L1-noneAnxiety/depression Wk4 FU(71,72) L2-moderatelyAnxiety/depression Wk4 FU(71,72) L3-extremely
Eltrombopag948114029214032456132977173629697745382859674644243
Placebo105662482221252051629194681141256897864027511256545252

[back to top]

Cmax -Pharmacokinetic Parameter of Azacitidine

An analysis of variance (ANOVA) on Cmax . The PK parameters were log transformed prior to analysis. The model included treatment as a fixed effect. Point estimates and their associated 90% CI were constructed for the differences in PK parameter values. The point estimates and their associated 90% CI were then back transformed to provide point estimates and 90% CI for the azacitidine + ltrombopag:azacitidine + placebo PK parameter ratios. (NCT02158936)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 Day 1: Pre-dose, 15 min, 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 hr post dose

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Eltrombopag744
Placebo535

[back to top]

AUC0-infinity -Pharmacokinetic(s) Parameter of Azacitidine

An analysis of variance (ANOVA) on AUC0-infinity. The PK parameters were log transformed prior to analysis. The model included treatment as a fixed effect. Point estimates and their associated 90% CI were constructed for the differences in PK parameter values. The point estimates and their associated 90% CI were then back transformed to provide point estimates and 90% CI for the azacitidine + eltrombopag:azacitidine + placebo PK parameter ratios. (NCT02158936)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 Day 1: Pre-dose, 15 min, 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 hr post dose

Interventionhr.ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Eltrombopag840
Placebo641

[back to top]

Summary of AML Progression From Investigator Assessment and Central Review (ITT)

"Progression to AML in MDS patients with baseline bone marrow blast < 20% was defined as meeting definition of disease progression according to the modified 2006 IWG response criteria for MDS with the additional requirement that bone marrow blast or peripheral blast increases from < 20% at baseline to ≥ 20% postbaseline. Progression assessment For patients with:~Less than 5% BM blasts: ≥ 50% increase in blasts to > 5% blasts; 5% - <10% BM blasts: ≥ 50% increase to > 10% blasts; 10% - <20% BM blasts: ≥ 50% increase to > 20% blasts; 20% - 30% BM blasts: ≥ 50% increase to > 30% blasts" (NCT02158936)
Timeframe: First day of each cycle (Cycles 3+), at the end of therapy visit and every 3 months in follow-up for approximately 2 years

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants progressed-AML - investigator assessParticipants progressed to AML - Central Review
Eltrombopag2721
Placebo1610

[back to top]

Summary of Post-Hoc Estimates of Steady-state Eltrombopag Cmax and Cmin Pharmacokinetic Parameters for a 50 mg Dose

Eltrombopag concentrations were analyzed using a population PK model along with data from other studies in healthy volunteers and in patients with MDS and/or AML. Post-hoc PK parameters were derived. Only patients from this study were included (163) (NCT02158936)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Week 2: Pre-dose, 1.5 and 3 hour post dose; Cycle 1, Week 3: 4, 5.5, and 7 hours post dose

Interventionμg/mL (Geometric Mean)
CmaxCmin
Eltrombopag7.704.41

[back to top]

Summary of Progression Free Survival From Central Review (ITT)

"Progression-free survival, defined as the time from randomization until either disease progression or death. The modified 2006 IWG criteria for MDS used for progression assessment For patients with:~Less than 5% BM blasts: ≥ 50% increase in blasts to > 5% blasts; 5% - <10% BM blasts: ≥ 50% increase to > 10% blasts; 10% - <20% BM blasts: ≥ 50% increase to > 20% blasts; 20% - 30% BM blasts: ≥ 50% increase to > 30% blasts" (NCT02158936)
Timeframe: First day of each cycle (Cycles 3+), at the end of therapy visit and every 3 months in follow-up for approximately 2 years

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
DeathDisease progression
Eltrombopag4432
Placebo4126

[back to top]

Toxicity Profile of Azacytidine and Sorafenib

Severity of toxicities graded according to the NCI Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects (CTCAE) v4.0. Standard reporting guidelines followed for adverse events. Safety data summarized by category, severity and frequency. (NCT02196857)
Timeframe: After 3, 28 day cycles

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
DiarrheaDyspneaFatigueFebrile NeutropeniaNauseaPainRash/Desquamation
Azacytidine + Sorafenib4254222

[back to top]

Participants With a Response CR + PR + CRi

Criteria for response per the International Working Group for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Complete Response (CR) was defined as NCT02196857)
Timeframe: After 3, 28 day cycles

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRi)
Azacytidine + Sorafenib414

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve of Volasertib 200 mg in Plasma Over the Time Interval From 0 Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-∞)

This outcome measure presents area under the concentration-time curve of Volasertib 200 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 in plasma over the time interval from 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞). (NCT02201329)
Timeframe: -0.05 hours before drug administration and 0:30 (hours:minutes), 1:00, 1:30, 2:00, 3:00, 4:00, 24:30, 48:30, 96:30, 144:30 and 335:55 after drug administration.

Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Volasertib 200 mg4190

[back to top]

Overall Objective Response (OR): Complete Remission (CR), Partial Remission (PR), or Marrow CR (mCR)

This outcome measure presents overall Objective Response (CR+PR+mCR). Response to treatment was evaluated according to the International Working Group (IWG) 2006 criteria. Best response was tabulated from all available data, with each patient being classified into one of the categories defined in CR, PR, mCR. (NCT02201329)
Timeframe: Up to 9 months.

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Objective Response (OR)Complete Remission (CR)Partial Remission (PR)Marrow Complete Remission (mCR)
Volasertib 200 mg2002

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) in the First Cycle for the Determination of the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)

"This outcome measure presents number of participants with DLTs in the first cycle for the determination of MTD. DLT was defined as any of the following Adverse Events (AEs) considered to be related to the study drug (Volasertib and/or Azacitidine).~Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade ≥3 drug-related non-haematologic toxicity.~Drug-related AEs that led to inability to deliver the full dose of the study drugs (Volasertib and/or Azacitidine) according to the assigned dose level within Cycle 1.~Absence of haematological recovery (sustained CTCAE grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia <50000/mm^3 and/or neutropenia <1000/mm^3) after completing Cycle 1 and lasting at least until Day 57 (from Day 1 of Cycle 1) despite complete marrow blast clearance on Day 29 (<5% blasts in the bone marrow.~Any other drug-related AEs that required treatment delay of ≥4 weeks between the Cycle 1 and Cycle 2 (i.e., Cycle 2 was not started until Day 57 of Cycle 1))." (NCT02201329)
Timeframe: Up to 57 days.

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Volasertib 200 mg2

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose of Volasertib

This outcome measure presents MTD of Volasertib in Combination with Azacitidine. The MTD was defined as the highest dose level at which Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) were reported in not more than 1 in 6 evaluable patients during Cycle 1. (NCT02201329)
Timeframe: Up to 57 days.

Interventionmg (Number)
Volasertib 200 mgNA

[back to top]

Maximum Measured Concentration of the Volasertib 200 mg in Plasma (Cmax)

This outcome measure presents maximum measured concentration of Volasertib 200 mg in plasma (Cmax). (NCT02201329)
Timeframe: -0.05 hours before drug administration and 0:30 (hours:minutes), 1:00, 1:30, 2:00, 3:00, 4:00, 24:30, 48:30, 96:30, 144:30 and 335:55 after drug administration.

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Volasertib 200 mg713

[back to top]

Dose Intensity Per Week of CC-486

Dose intensity was the cumulative dose divided by the dosing period in weeks. (NCT02250326)
Timeframe: Up to 30 Aug 2017 for nab-paclitaxel and CC-486 + nab-paclitaxel and 23 Dec 2017 for Durva + nab-paclitaxel; maximum treatment duration = 82.1 weeks, 52.6 weeks and 66.1 weeks for nab-paclitaxel, CC-486 + nab-paclitaxel and Durva + nab-paclitaxel

Interventionmg/ week (Mean)
Nab-Paclitaxel + CC-486 Combination Arm716.66

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Study Drug Dose Reductions

A dose reduction occurred when the dose assigned at a visit was lower than the dose assigned at the previous visit. Dose reductions were typically caused by clinically significant laboratory abnormalities and/or TEAEs or toxicities. (NCT02250326)
Timeframe: Up to 16 Jan 2017 for CC-486 + nab-paclitaxel and up to 23 Dec 2017 for nab-paclitaxel and Durva + nab-paclitaxel; maximum treatment duration = 82.1 weeks, 52.6 weeks and 66.1 weeks for nab-paclitaxel, CC-486 + nab-paclitaxel and Durva + nab-paclitaxel

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Nab-PaclitaxelDurvalumab (Reductions Not Allowed per Protocol)
Nab-Paclitaxel + Durvalumab Combination Arm14.10.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Study Drug Dose Reductions

A dose reduction occurred when the dose assigned at a visit was lower than the dose assigned at the previous visit. Dose reductions were typically caused by clinically significant laboratory abnormalities and/or TEAEs or toxicities. (NCT02250326)
Timeframe: Up to 16 Jan 2017 for CC-486 + nab-paclitaxel and up to 23 Dec 2017 for nab-paclitaxel and Durva + nab-paclitaxel; maximum treatment duration = 82.1 weeks, 52.6 weeks and 66.1 weeks for nab-paclitaxel, CC-486 + nab-paclitaxel and Durva + nab-paclitaxel

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Nab-PaclitaxelCC-486
Nab-Paclitaxel + CC-486 Combination Arm10.120.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Best Overall Response of Complete Response or Partial Response According to RECIST V 1.1 Criteria

Overall Response was defined as percentage of participants who achieved a radiologic confirmed complete response or partial response according to RECIST V 1.1 criteria and compared with baseline among all tumor assessments, where baseline was the last CT obtained prior to or on Day 1 of treatment. Per RECIST V 1.1 criteria, a CR is defined as a disappearance of all target lesions; a PR is defined as having at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions from baseline. Responses were evaluated every 6 weeks. (NCT02250326)
Timeframe: Up to 30 Aug 2017 for nab-paclitaxel and CC-486 + nab-paclitaxel and 23 Dec 2017 for Durva + nab-paclitaxel; maximum treatment duration = 82.1 weeks, 52.6 weeks and 66.1 weeks for nab-paclitaxel, CC-486 + nab-paclitaxel and Durva + nab-paclitaxel

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Nab-Paclitaxel + CC-486 Combination Arm13.6
Nab-Paclitaxel + Durvalumab Combination Arm27.8
Nab-Paclitaxel Alone16.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment

The discontinuation rate was defined as the percentage of participants who had study drug discontinued and was assessed throughout the conduct of the study. (NCT02250326)
Timeframe: Up to 30 Aug 2017 for nab-paclitaxel and CC-486 + nab-paclitaxel and 23 Dec 2017 for Durva + nab-paclitaxel; maximum treatment duration = 82.1 weeks, 52.6 weeks and 66.1 weeks for nab-paclitaxel, CC-486 + nab-paclitaxel and Durva + nab-paclitaxel

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Nab-Paclitaxel + CC-486 Combination Arm100.0
Nab-Paclitaxel + Durvalumab Combination Arm80.8
Nab-Paclitaxel Alone96.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Entire Treatment Period

TEAEs were defined as any adverse event or serious adverse event that occurred or worsened on or after the day of the first dose of the IP through 28 days after the last dose of IP for Arms A and C or up to 90 days after the last dose for Arm B, and those SAEs made known to the investigator at any time thereafter that are suspected of being related to IP. A serious AE (SAE) = any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. The severity of AEs were graded based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.0 and the scale: Grade 1 = Mild l intervention/therapy required Grade 2 = Moderate Grade 3 = Severe Grade 4 = Life threatening Grade 5 = Death. (NCT02250326)
Timeframe: TEAEs were collected up to 4 weeks after receiving last dose of IP for nab-paclitaxel and CC-486 + nab-paclitaxel, and up to 90 days after the last IP dose for Durva + nab-paclitaxel; TEAEs were collected up to 86.1 weeks

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TEAESerious TEAEGrade (GR) 3/4 TEAEGrade 3 or HigherTreatment Related TEAETreatment Related Serious TEAETreatment Related GR 3 or Higher TEAETEAE With Action to Reduce/Interrupt IPTreatment-Related to Reduce or Interrupt IPTEAE with Action Taken to Withdraw IPTEAE with Fatal OutcomeTreatment Related TEAE with Fatal Outcome
Nab-Paclitaxel + CC-486 Combination Arm793048497411324936840
Nab-Paclitaxel + Durvalumab Combination Arm7837535571173257329124
Nab-Paclitaxel Alone78294747685253827831

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Study Drug Dose Reductions

A dose reduction occurred when the dose assigned at a visit was lower than the dose assigned at the previous visit. Dose reductions were typically caused by clinically significant laboratory abnormalities and/or TEAEs or toxicities. (NCT02250326)
Timeframe: Up to 16 Jan 2017 for CC-486 + nab-paclitaxel and up to 23 Dec 2017 for nab-paclitaxel and Durva + nab-paclitaxel; maximum treatment duration = 82.1 weeks, 52.6 weeks and 66.1 weeks for nab-paclitaxel, CC-486 + nab-paclitaxel and Durva + nab-paclitaxel

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Nab-Paclitaxel
Nab-Paclitaxel Alone10.1

[back to top]

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator

Progression-free survival was defined as the time in months from the date of randomization/assignment to the date of disease progression according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 criteria documented by computed tomography (CT) scan, not including symptomatic deterioration, or death (any cause) on or prior to the clinical cut-off date, which ever occurred earlier. Participants who did not have disease progression and had not died, regardless of whether they were discontinued from treatment, were censored at the date of last tumor assessment, on or prior to the clinical cut-off date that the participant was progression free. Progressive Disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions from nadir. (NCT02250326)
Timeframe: From date of first dose of IP to DP; up to data cut-off date of 30 August (Aug) 2017 for nab-paclitaxel and CC-486 + nab-paclitaxel and 23 December (Dec) 2017 for Durva + nab-paclitaxel; participants were followed for PFS for up to 18 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Nab-Paclitaxel + CC-486 Combination Arm3.2
Nab-Paclitaxel + Durvalumab Combination Arm4.5
Nab-Paclitaxel Alone4.2

[back to top]

Dose Intensity Per Week of Nab-Paclitaxel

Dose intensity was the cumulative dose divided by the dosing period in weeks. (NCT02250326)
Timeframe: Up to 30 Aug 2017 for nab-paclitaxel and CC-486 + nab-paclitaxel and 23 Dec 2017 for Durva + nab-paclitaxel; maximum treatment duration = 82.1 weeks, 52.6 weeks and 66.1 weeks for nab-paclitaxel, CC-486 + nab-paclitaxel and Durva + nab-paclitaxel

Interventionmg/m^2/week (Mean)
Nab-Paclitaxel + CC-486 Combination Arm54.73
Nab-Paclitaxel + Durvalumab Combination Arm57.18
Nab-Paclitaxel Alone58.61

[back to top]

Dose Intensity Per Week of Durvalumab

Dose intensity was the cumulative dose divided by the dosing period in weeks). (NCT02250326)
Timeframe: Up to 30 Aug 2017 for nab-paclitaxel and CC-486 + nab-paclitaxel and 23 Dec 2017 for Durva + nab-paclitaxel; maximum treatment duration = 82.1 weeks, 52.6 weeks and 66.1 weeks for nab-paclitaxel, CC-486 + nab-paclitaxel and Durva + nab-paclitaxel

Interventionmg/week (Mean)
Nab-Paclitaxel + Durvalumab Combination Arm279.96

[back to top]

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival was defined as the time in months between randomization/treatment assignment and death from any cause. Participants who were still alive as of the clinical cut-off date had their OS censored at the date of last contact or clinical cut-off, whichever was earlier. Participants who were lost to follow-up prior to the end of the study or who were withdrawn from the study were censored at the time of last contact. (NCT02250326)
Timeframe: Up to 30 Aug 2017 for nab-paclitaxel and CC-486 + nab-paclitaxel and 23 Dec 2017 for Durva + nab-paclitaxel; participants were followed for overall survival up to 30 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Nab-Paclitaxel + CC-486 Combination Arm8.1
Nab-Paclitaxel + Durvalumab Combination Arm10.1
Nab-Paclitaxel Alone17.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) or Stable Disease (SD) According to RECIST V 1.1 Criteria

"Disease control rate was defined as the percentage of participants who had a CR, PR or SD during the course of the study, according to RECIST version 1.1 criteria, as evaluated by the investigator. RECIST Version 1.1 criteria is defined as follows:~Complete Response is the disappearance of all target lesions;~Partial Response is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions from baseline;~Stable Disease is neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase of lesions to qualify for progressive disease. Responses were evaluated every 6 weeks." (NCT02250326)
Timeframe: Up to 30 Aug 2017 for nab-paclitaxel and CC-486 + nab-paclitaxel and 23 Dec 2017 for Durva + nab-paclitaxel; maximum treatment duration = 82.1 weeks, 52.6 weeks and 66.1 weeks for nab-paclitaxel, CC-486 + nab-paclitaxel and Durva + nab-paclitaxel

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Nab-Paclitaxel + CC-486 Combination Arm65.4
Nab-Paclitaxel + Durvalumab Combination Arm70.9
Nab-Paclitaxel Alone67.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall Survival (OS) (median) was determined using the number of months measured from the initial date of treatment to the recorded date of death of participants. (NCT02260440)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab and Azacitidine6.2

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free Survival (PFS) (median) was determined using the number of months measured from the initial date of treatment to the date of documented progression, or the date of death (in the absence of progression) of participants. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT02260440)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab and Azacitidine2.1

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

The objective response rate is estimated by the proportion (percentage) of participants with the best response of complete response (CR), or partial response (PR) by RECIST 1.1 criteria, with corresponding exact 95% confidence limits being reported. Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT02260440)
Timeframe: Up to 14 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pembrolizumab and Azacitidine3

[back to top]

Phase 2: Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE and SAE

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a medicinal investigational drug. The untoward medical occurrence does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with treatment. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of present hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is a medically important event that may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization. A TEAE was defined as any AE either reported for the first time or worsening of a pre-existing event after first dose of study drug and within 30 days of the last dose of study drug. (NCT02265510)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to approximately 1.3 years)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TEAESAE
Phase 2 Cohort I - INCB052793 35 mg + Azacytidine 75 mg/m^297
Phase 2 Cohort J - Itacitinib 300 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2108

[back to top]

Phase 1a, 1b, and Phase 2: Tmax: Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration for INCB052793

Tmax is the time to maximum (peak) observed plasma drug concentration. Summary of Steady-State, Day 15, was evaluated by dosing regimen. For PK analyses subjects in TGA and TGB are combined by dosage group because only 3 subjects were enrolled in each dose group in TGB and 4 subject for first dose in TGB 50 mg. (NCT02265510)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 15: predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 hours postdose in Phase 1a; 0 (predose), 0.08, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours postdose in Phase 1b and Phase 2

Interventionhours (hr) (Median)
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 15 mg1.1
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 25 mg0.76
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 35 mg2.0
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 50 mg1.1
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 75 mg2.2
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 100 mg2.0
Phase 1b Cohort B - INCB052793 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg1.0
Phase 1b Cohort F - INCB052793 25 mg + Azacytidine 75 mg/m^21.1
Phase 1b Cohort F - INCB052793 35 mg + Azacytidine 75 mg/m^21.1
Phase 2 Cohort I - INCB052793 35 mg + Azacytidine 75 mg/m^20.51

[back to top]

Phase 1a, 1b, and Phase 2: Tmax: Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration for Itacitinib

Tmax is the time to maximum (peak) observed plasma drug concentration. (NCT02265510)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 15: predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 hours postdose in Phase 1a; 0 (predose), 0.08, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours postdose in Phase 1b and Phase 2

Interventionhr (Median)
Phase 2 Cohort J - Itacitinib 300 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^23.5

[back to top]

Phase 2: Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Hematological Malignancies

ORR is defined as the proportion of participants who achieved complete response (CR), CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), partial response (PR), or hematologic improvement (HI), using the IWG response criteria. (NCT02265510)
Timeframe: Baseline through end of study (Up to approximately 4.5 years)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 2 Cohort I-INCB052793 +Azacytidine (AML)0
Phase 2 Cohort I-INCB052793 +Azacytidine (MDS)1
Phase 2 Cohort J-Itacitinib +Azacitidine (AML)1
Phase 2 Cohort J-Itacitinib +Azacitidine (MDS)0

[back to top]

Phase 1a and 1b: Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a medicinal investigational drug. The untoward medical occurrence does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with treatment. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of present hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is a medically important event that may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization. A TEAE was defined as any AE either reported for the first time or worsening of a pre-existing event after first dose of study drug and within 30 days of the last dose of study drug. (NCT02265510)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to approximately 3.4 years)

,,,,,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TEAESAE
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 100 mg62
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 15 mg30
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 25 mg31
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 35 mg60
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 50 mg42
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 75 mg33
Phase 1a TGB - INCB052793 25 mg31
Phase 1a TGB - INCB052793 35 mg42
Phase 1a TGB - INCB052793 50 mg42
Phase 1b Cohort B - INCB052793 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg75
Phase 1b Cohort F - INCB052793 25 mg + Azacytidine 75 mg/m^254
Phase 1b Cohort F - INCB052793 35 mg + Azacytidine 75 mg/m^21614

[back to top]

Phase 1A and 1B: Percentage of Participants With Response as Determined by Investigator's Assessment

Response rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved best overall response (BOR) as determined by IWG response criteria of investigator's assessment. A participant was considered an objective responder based on the following- Solid tumors: participant had a best overall response (BOR) of CR or PR, Lymphoma: participant had a BOR of complete radiologic response/complete metabolic response or partial remission/partial metabolic response, AML: participant had a BOR of CR, CRi, morphological leukemia-free state (MLFS), or PR, MDS: participant had a BOR of CR, PR, or marrow CR, MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN): participant had a BOR of CR, PR, or marrow response, MM: participant had a BOR of stringent CR, CR, very good PR, PR, or MR. Subjects are combined by tumor type for this analysis. (NCT02265510)
Timeframe: Baseline through end of study (Up to approximately 4.5 years)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 in Solid Tumors0
Phase 1a TGB - INCB052793 in Lymphoma0
Phase 1a TGB - INCB052793 in MDS/MPN1
Phase 1a TGB - INCB052793 in MM0
Phase 1b Cohort B - INCB052793 + Dexamethasone in MM2
Phase 1b Cohort F-INCB052793 +Azacytidine in AML4
Phase 1b Cohort F-INCB052793 +Azacytidine in MDS3
Phase 1b Cohort F-INCB052793 +Azacytidine in MDS/MPN2

[back to top]

Phase 1a, 1b, and Phase 2: AUC0-τ: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over Dosing Interval for INCB052793

AUC0-τ is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time = 0 to the last measurable concentration at time = t measured at steady state (Day 15). For PK analyses subjects in TGA and TGB are combined by dosage group because only 3 subjects were enrolled in each dose group in TGB and 4 subject for first dose in TGB 50 mg. (NCT02265510)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 15: predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 hours postdose in Phase 1a; 0 (predose), 0.08, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours postdose in Phase 1b and Phase 2

InterventionnM*hr (Mean)
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 15 mg4750
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 25 mg9170
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 35 mg8430
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 50 mg14700
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 75 mg18300
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 100 mg27800
Phase 1b Cohort B - INCB052793 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg6390
Phase 1b Cohort F - INCB052793 25 mg + Azacytidine 75 mg/m^29580
Phase 1b Cohort F - INCB052793 35 mg + Azacytidine 75 mg/m^210200
Phase 2 Cohort I - INCB052793 35 mg + Azacytidine 75 mg/m^29380

[back to top]

Phase 1a, 1b, and Phase 2: AUC0-τ: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over Dosing Interval for Itacitinib

AUC0-τ is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time = 0 to the last measurable concentration at time = t measured at steady state (Day 15). (NCT02265510)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 15: predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 hours postdose in Phase 1a; 0 (predose), 0.08, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours postdose in Phase 1b and Phase 2

InterventionnM*hr (Mean)
Phase 2 Cohort J - Itacitinib 300 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^29870

[back to top]

Phase 1a, 1b, and Phase 2: Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for INCB052793

Cmax is defined as the maximum observed plasma concentration measured at steady state (Day 15). For PK analyses subjects in TGA and TGB are combined by dosage group because only 3 subjects were enrolled in each dose group in TGB and 4 subject for first dose in TGB 50 mg. (NCT02265510)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 15: predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 hours postdose in Phase 1a; 0 (predose), 0.08, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours postdose in Phase 1b and Phase 2

InterventionnM (Mean)
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 15 mg522
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 25 mg1110
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 35 mg1120
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 50 mg2050
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 75 mg1840
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 100 mg2890
Phase 1b Cohort B - INCB052793 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg928
Phase 1b Cohort F - INCB052793 25 mg + Azacytidine 75 mg/m^21270
Phase 1b Cohort F - INCB052793 35 mg + Azacytidine 75 mg/m^21480
Phase 2 Cohort I - INCB052793 35 mg + Azacytidine 75 mg/m^21610

[back to top]

Phase 1a, 1b, and Phase 2: Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Itacitinib

Cmax is defined as the maximum observed plasma concentration measured at steady state (Day 15). (NCT02265510)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 15: predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 hours postdose in Phase 1a; 0 (predose), 0.08, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours postdose in Phase 1b and Phase 2

InterventionnM (Mean)
Phase 2 Cohort J - Itacitinib 300 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^21310

[back to top]

Apparent Total Clearance (CL/F) Of CC-486

Apparent volume of distribution, calculated as [(CL/F)/λz]. (NCT02269943)
Timeframe: Blood samples for oral azacitidine PK assessment were collected prior to each dose (pre-dose) and over the 8-hour period following each dose (0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose or similar schedule).

,
InterventionLiters/hour (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 14
CC-486 200 mg509.51450
CC-486 300 mg845.3643.7

[back to top]

Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) Of CC-486

Time to Cmax, obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time data. (NCT02269943)
Timeframe: Blood samples for oral azacitidine PK assessment were collected prior to each dose (pre-dose) and over the 8-hour period following each dose (0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose or similar schedule).

,
InterventionHours (Median)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 14
CC-486 200 mg1.01.0
CC-486 300 mg1.31.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as any adverse event (AE) or serious adverse event (SAE) that occurred or worsened on or after the day of the first dose of the investigational product (IP) through 28 days after the last dose of IP. In addition, any SAE with an onset date more than 28 day after the last dose of IP that was assessed by the investigator as related to IP was considered a TEAE. The severity of AEs was graded based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.0 and based on the following scale: Grade 1 = Mild Grade 2 = Moderate Grade 3 = Severe Grade 4 = Life threatening Grade 5 = Death. (NCT02269943)
Timeframe: From date of first dose of study treatment to 28 days after last dose of study treatment; up to final data cut-off date of 08 August 2017; median treatment duration was 257 days for CC-486 200 mg and 114.5 days for CC-486 300 mg

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any TEAEAny TEAE Related to IPAny Serious TEAEAny Serious TEAE Related to IPAny CTCAE Grade 3 or 4 TEAEAny CTCAE Grade 3 or 4 TEAE Related to IPAny TEAE Leading to DeathAny TEAE Leading to Dose ReductionAny TEAE Leading to Drug InterruptionAny TEAE Leading to IP Discontinuation
CC-486 200 mg6643661541
CC-486 300 mg3028127201619910

[back to top]

Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of CC-486

Terminal phase half-life in plasma, calculated as [(ln 2)/λz]. t1/2 was only calculated when a reliable estimate for λz could be obtained. (NCT02269943)
Timeframe: Blood samples for oral azacitidine PK assessment were collected prior to each dose (pre-dose) and over the 8-hour period following each dose (0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose or similar schedule).

,
InterventionHours (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 14
CC-486 200 mg0.5620.584
CC-486 300 mg0.6350.640

[back to top]

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on an Independent Radiology Assessment According to RECIST 1.1 Criteria

PFS was defined as the time from the date of start of the study treatment to the date of disease progression or death (any cause) on or prior to the data cut-off date for the statistical analysis, whichever occurred earlier, based on an independent radiology assessment of response using RECIST v1.1 criteria. Progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target or non-target lesions from nadir or appearance of a new lesion. (NCT02269943)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of documented disease progression; up to data cut off date of 08 August 2017; median follow-up time for censored participants was 12.3 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
CC-486 200 mg6.2
CC-486 300 mg4.4

[back to top]

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Overall Survival

Overall survival was the time from the first dose of study drug to patient death from any cause. Participants who did not die were censored at the last known time the patient was alive date or the clinical data cutoff date, whichever was earlier. (NCT02269943)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of study treatment to the first date of progressive disease or death; up to data cut-off date of 08 August 2017; overall median follow-up time for censored participants was 20.4 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
CC-486 200 mg18.0
CC-486 300 mgNA

[back to top]

Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) Of CC-486

Apparent volume of distribution, calculated as [(CL/F)/λz]. (NCT02269943)
Timeframe: Blood samples for oral azacitidine PK assessment were collected prior to each dose (pre-dose) and over the 8-hour period following each dose (0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose or similar schedule).

,
InterventionLiters (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 14
CC-486 200 mg412.91221
CC-486 300 mg774.6594.8

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration -Time Curve From 0 Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC-inf, AUC0-∞) Of CC-486

Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from Time 0 extrapolated to infinity, calculated as [AUCt + Ct/ λz]. Ct is the last quantifiable concentration. No AUC extrapolation was performed with unreliable λz. If AUC %Extrap was ≥25%, AUC inf was not reported. (NCT02269943)
Timeframe: Blood samples for oral azacitidine PK assessment were collected prior to each dose (pre-dose) and over the 8-hour period following each dose (0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose or similar schedule).

,
Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 14
CC-486 200 mg392.5138.0
CC-486 300 mg354.9466.0

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration Of CC-486 (AUC-t)

Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from Time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration, calculated by linear trapezoidal method when concentrations are increasing and the logarithmic trapezoidal method when concentrations are decreasing. (NCT02269943)
Timeframe: Blood samples for oral azacitidine PK assessment were collected prior to each dose (pre-dose) and over the 8-hour period following each dose (0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose or similar schedule).

,
Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 14
CC-486 200 mg390.0130.3
CC-486 300 mg351.7461.3

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) Of CC-486

Maximum observed plasma concentration, obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time data. (NCT02269943)
Timeframe: Blood samples for oral azacitidine PK assessment were collected prior to each dose (pre-dose) and over the 8-hour period following each dose (0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose or similar schedule).

,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 14
CC-486 200 mg266.3102.7
CC-486 300 mg170.7287.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete or Partial Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) Based on an Independent Radiology Assessment (IRA)

"Overall response rate was defined as the combined incidence of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR), confirmed no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met, based on independent radiology assessment according to RECIST 1.1 criteria.~Complete response was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions; Partial response is at least a 30% decrease from baseline in the sum of diameters of target lesions with no progression of non-target lesions and no new lesions or disappearance of target lesions with persistence of one or more non-target lesions from baseline." (NCT02269943)
Timeframe: Tumor response was assessed every (Q) 6 weeks for the first 3 evaluations then Q 9 weeks until disease progression as of the cut-off date of 08 August 2017; the median duration of treatment was 257 days for the 200 mg dose and 114.5 days for 300 mg dose

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CC-486 200 mg0
CC-486 300 mg15.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Stable Disease for ≥ 16 Weeks From the Date of the First Treatment, or CR or PR According to RECIST 1.1 Criteria and Based on an Independent Radiology Assessment

Disease Control Rate (DCR) was defined as the percentage of participants with a CR, PR, confirmed ≥ 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met, or stable disease for ≥ 16 weeks from the first treatment, based on independent radiology assessment using RECIST 1.1 criteria. A complete response was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions; a partial response is at least a 30% decrease from baseline in the sum of diameters of target lesions with no progression of non-target lesions and no new lesions or disappearance of target lesions with persistence of one or more non-target lesions from baseline. Stable disease is defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase of lesions to qualify for progressive disease (NCT02269943)
Timeframe: Tumor response was assessed every 6 weeks for the first 3 evaluations then every 9 weeks until disease progression. As of the cut-off date of 08 August 2017 the median duration of treatment was 257 days for the 200 mg dose and 114.5 days for 300 mg dose

Interventionpercentage of participants (Median)
CC-486 200 mg60.0
CC-486 300 mg50.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Progressed to Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)

For all participants who received at least one dose of study drug, continuous monitoring for progression to AML occurred in the post treatment follow up period. (NCT02281084)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of study drug up to the data cut off date of 19 June 2019; median follow up time for AML progression = 11.59 and 5.65 months respectively in the SD and PD arms for oral AZA and 6.21 months for SD/PD in the combination arm.

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Stable Disease (SD) Cohort: Oral Azacitidine28.1
Progressive Disease (PD) Cohort: Oral Azacitidine18.2
Stable Disease Cohort: Oral Azacitidine and Durvalumab16.7
Progressive Disease Cohort: Oral Azacitidine and Durvalumab60.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Progressive Disease at Baseline Who Achieved Stable Disease

A participant was considered as having a stable disease if the disease neither responded nor progressed during or after study treatment. (NCT02281084)
Timeframe: Response was assessed every 2 cycles following treatment during the first 6 cycles, then every 3 cycles thereafter; median duration of treatment = 5.26 and 3.81 months for SD/PD for oral AZA arms respectively, and 1.84 months for AZA and Durva SD/PD arms

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Progressive Disease (PD) Cohort: Oral Azacitidine31.8
Progressive Disease Cohort: Oral Azacitidine and Durvalumab20.0

[back to top]

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Onset of First and Best Response

Time to onset of first response was defined as the time between the date of first investigational product (IP) dose and the earliest date any response (CR, PR, mCR, or HI) was first observed. Participants who did not achieve any defined response during the treatment period were censored at the date of treatment discontinuation, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Best response is the best recorded response or treatment outcome from the start of the study treatment until the end of the study treatment taking into account the requirements for confirmation of response. (NCT02281084)
Timeframe: Response was assessed every 2 cycles following treatment during the first 6 cycles, then every 3 cycles thereafter; median duration of treatment = 5.26 and 3.81 months for SD/PD for oral AZA arms respectively, and 1.84 months for AZA and Durva SD/PD arms

,,,
InterventionMonths (Median)
Onset of First ResponseOnset of Best Response
Progressive Disease (PD) Cohort: Oral Azacitidine11.974.41
Progressive Disease Cohort: Oral Azacitidine and DurvalumabNA2.17
Stable Disease (SD) Cohort: Oral AzacitidineNA3.68
Stable Disease Cohort: Oral Azacitidine and DurvalumabNA3.29

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

"TEAEs were defined as AEs occurring or worsening on or after the date of the first dose of oral aza or durva and within 28 days after last dose of oral aza or 90 days after last dose of durva~A serious adverse event (SAE) is any:~Death;~Life-threatening event;~Any inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization;~Persistent or significant disability or incapacity;~Congenital anomaly or birth defect;~Any other important medical event The severity of an AE was evaluated by the investigator according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) (Version 4.0) where Grade 1 = Mild, Grade 2 = Moderate, Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Life-threatening and Grade 5 = Death." (NCT02281084)
Timeframe: From first dose of IP until 28 days after final oral AZA dose, 90 days after final durva dose and/or treatment stopped; median duration of treatment = 5.26 and 3.81 months for SD/PD for oral AZA arms respectively; 1.84 months for AZA and Durva SD/PD arms

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
≥ 1 TEAE≥ 1 TEAE Related to (R/T) Oral Azacitidine (AZA)≥ 1 TEAE R/T Durvalumab (Durva)≥ 1 TEAE R/T Oral AZA or Durva≥ 1 Serious TEAE≥ 1 Serious TEAE R/T Oral AZA≥ 1 Serious TEAE R/T Durva≥ 1 Serious TEAE R/T Oral AZA or Durva≥ 1 NCI CTC Grade (GR) 3 or 4 TEAE≥ 1 NCI CTC GR 3 or 4 TEAE R/T Oral AZA≥ 1 NCI CTC GR 3 or 4 TEAE R/T Durva≥ 1 NCI CTC GR 3 or 4 TEAE R/T AZA or Durva≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Death≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Death R/T Oral AZA≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Death R/T Durva≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Death R/T AZA or Durva≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of AZA≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Reduction of Durva≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Reduction of AZA or Durva≥1 TEAE Leading to Interruption of AZA≥1 TEAE Leading to Interruption of Durva≥1 TEAE Leading to Interruption of AZA or Durva≥ 1 TEAE Leading to Discontinuation (D/C) of AZA≥ 1 TEAE Leading to D/C of Durva≥ 1 TEAE Leading to D/C of AZA or Durva
Progressive Disease (PD) Cohort: Oral Azacitidine2220020153031910010400080813012808
Progressive Disease Cohort: Oral Azacitidine and Durvalumab5444511153230000000404434
Stable Disease (SD) Cohort: Oral Azacitidine322802825404321801840009092102115015
Stable Disease Cohort: Oral Azacitidine and Durvalumab6656421254242000101323434

[back to top]

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Duration of Best Response

Duration of hematologic response and/or improvement was defined as the time from the date response or improvement was first observed to the date of documented relapse or disease progression as defined by the modified IWG 2006 criteria. Particpants who maintained hematologic response and/or improvement through the end of the treatment period were censored as the date of treatment discontinuation or death, whichever occurred first. (NCT02281084)
Timeframe: Response was assessed every 2 cycles following treatment during the first 6 cycles, then every 3 cycles thereafter; median duration of treatment = 5.26 and 3.81 months for SD/PD for oral AZA arms respectively, and 1.84 months for AZA and Durva SD/PD arms

InterventionMonths (Median)
Stable Disease (SD) Cohort: Oral AzacitidineNA
Progressive Disease (PD) Cohort: Oral AzacitidineNA
Stable Disease Cohort: Oral Azacitidine and DurvalumabNA
Progressive Disease Cohort: Oral Azacitidine and DurvalumabNA

[back to top]

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Duration of First Response

Duration of hematologic response and/or improvement was defined as the time from the date response or improvement was first observed to the date of documented relapse or disease progression as defined by the modified IWG 2006 criteria. Particpants who maintained hematologic response and/or improvement through the end of the treatment period were censored as the date of treatment discontinuation or death, whichever occurred first. (NCT02281084)
Timeframe: Response was assessed every 2 cycles following treatment during the first 6 cycles, then every 3 cycles thereafter; median duration of treatment = 5.26 and 3.81 months for SD/PD for oral AZA arms respectively, and 1.84 months for AZA and Durva SD/PD arms

InterventionMonths (Median)
Stable Disease (SD) Cohort: Oral Azacitidine9.24
Progressive Disease (PD) Cohort: Oral AzacitidineNA
Stable Disease Cohort: Oral Azacitidine and DurvalumabNA
Progressive Disease Cohort: Oral Azacitidine and DurvalumabNA

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Duration of Stable Disease

The duration of stable disease was defined as the time between any two observations of objective disease progression (modified IWG criteria), starting from the first day of dosing with IP. Participants who maintained stable disease through the end of the treatment period were censored at the date of study termination. (NCT02281084)
Timeframe: Response was assessed every 2 cycles following treatment during the first 6 cycles, then every 3 cycles thereafter; median duration of treatment = 5.26 and 3.81 months for SD/PD for oral AZA arms respectively, and 1.84 months for AZA and Durva SD/PD arms

InterventionMonths (Median)
Stable Disease (SD) Cohort: Oral AzacitidineNA
Progressive Disease (PD) Cohort: Oral AzacitidineNA
Progressive Disease Cohort: Oral Azacitidine and DurvalumabNA

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Onset to Achieve Stable Disease

A participant was considered as having a stable disease if the disease neither responded nor progressed during or after study treatment. (NCT02281084)
Timeframe: Response was assessed every 2 cycles following treatment during the first 6 cycles, then every 3 cycles thereafter; median duration of treatment = 5.26 and 3.81 months for SD/PD for oral AZA arms respectively, and 1.84 months for AZA and Durva SD/PD arms

InterventionMonths (Median)
Progressive Disease (PD) Cohort: Oral AzacitidineNA
Progressive Disease Cohort: Oral Azacitidine and DurvalumabNA

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Overall Survival

Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause, and was calculated using date of first dose and date of death, or date of last follow-up for censored subjects. All participants were followed until drop out (withdrawal of consent from further data collection or lost to follow-up), death, or study termination. Participants who dropped out or were alive at study termination (or at the time of the interim analysis) had their OS times censored at the time of last contact, as appropriate. (NCT02281084)
Timeframe: From day 1 of study drug to the data cut off date of 19 June 2019; median follow-up for OS = 15.96 and 8.35 months respectively in the SD and PD oral AZA alone arms and 13.48 and 13.33 months in the SD and PD combination arms

InterventionMonths (Median)
Stable Disease (SD) Cohort: Oral Azacitidine17.00
Progressive Disease (PD) Cohort: Oral Azacitidine6.28
Stable Disease Cohort: Oral Azacitidine and Durvalumab14.70
Progressive Disease Cohort: Oral Azacitidine and Durvalumab14.56

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD), relapse, or death due to any cause during or after the treatment period, whichever occurred first, according to IWG 2006 response criteria for MDS. Participants who were still alive and progression-free were censored at the date of their last response assessment. Progressive disease is defined as follows: - an increase in BM blasts relative to nadir: •If nadir less than 5% blasts: ≥ 50% increase in blasts to > 5% blasts •If nadir 5% - 10% blasts: ≥ 50% increase in blasts to > 10% blasts •If nadir 10% - 20% blasts: ≥ 50% increase in blasts to > 20% blasts •If nadir 20% - 30% blasts: ≥ 50% increase in blasts to > 30% blasts And any of the following: •At least 50% decrement from maximum remission/response levels in granulocytes or platelets •Reduction in Hgb concentration by ≥ 2 g/dL •Transfusion dependence (NCT02281084)
Timeframe: From day 1 of study drug to the data cut off date of 19 June 2019; median follow-up for OS = 15.96 and 8.35 months respectively in the SD/ PD oral AZA arms and 13.48 and 13.33 months in the SD/PD oral AZA and Durva arms

InterventionMonths (Median)
Stable Disease (SD) Cohort: Oral Azacitidine14.86
Progressive Disease (PD) Cohort: Oral Azacitidine6.28
Stable Disease Cohort: Oral Azacitidine and Durvalumab14.70
Progressive Disease Cohort: Oral Azacitidine and Durvalumab12.10

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Time to Progression to AML

Time to AML progression was defined as the time from the date of first dose of IP until the date the participant had documented progression to AML. (NCT02281084)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of study drug up to the data cut off date of 19 June 2019; median follow up time for AML progression = 11.59 and 5.65 months respectively in the SD and PD arms for oral AZA and 6.21 months for SD/PD in the combination arm.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Stable Disease (SD) Cohort: Oral AzacitidineNA
Progressive Disease (PD) Cohort: Oral AzacitidineNA
Stable Disease Cohort: Oral Azacitidine and DurvalumabNA
Progressive Disease Cohort: Oral Azacitidine and Durvalumab6.21

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate Based on the Modified International Working Group (IWG) 2006 Response Criteria for Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)

"The overall response rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved an objective response including: hematologic improvement (HI), partial remission (PR), complete remission (CR), or marrow complete remission (mCR). Hematologic response was defined as:~CR: ≤ 5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines; peripheral blood (PB) shows: hemoglobin ≥11 g/dL, neutrophils ≥1.0x10^9/L, platelets ≥100x10^9/dL, blasts (0%)~PR: same as CR bone marrow (BM) shows blasts decreased by ≥ 50% over pre-treatment but still > 5%; cellularity and morphology not relevant~mCR: BM: ≤ 5% myeloblasts and decrease by ≥ 50% over pre-treatment PB, PB: if HI responses, noted in addition to mCR~HI: HI erythroid response (HI-E); HI neutrophil response (HI-N) ; HI platelet response (HI-P)" (NCT02281084)
Timeframe: Response was assessed every 2 cycles following treatment during the first 6 cycles, then every 3 cycles thereafter; median duration of treatment = 5.26 and 3.81 months for SD/PD for oral AZA arms respectively, and 1.84 months for AZA and Durva SD/PD arms

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Stable Disease (SD) Cohort: Oral Azacitidine6.3
Progressive Disease (PD) Cohort: Oral Azacitidine4.5
Stable Disease Cohort: Oral Azacitidine and Durvalumab16.7
Progressive Disease Cohort: Oral Azacitidine and Durvalumab0

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) Following Administration of Milademetan In Combination With 5-Azacitidine (AZA)

Pharmacokinetic parameter maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was assessed at select time points and the geometric means (coefficient of variation %) are presented. (NCT02319369)
Timeframe: Predose, 0.5 hour (hr), 1 hr, 2 hr, 3 hr, 6 hr of Cycle 1, Day 1 (AZA); Predose, 0.5 hr, 1 hr, 2 hr, 3 hr, 4 hr, 6-10 hr of Day 5, Day 7 (predose) (Cohorts 10e and 12e), Day 8 (Cohorts 11f and 13f), and Day 14 (Cohorts 10e-13f) (each cycle is 28 days)

,,,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 1Cycle 1, Day 5Cycle 1, Day 7Cycle 1, Day 8Cycle 1, Day 14
Cohort 10e: Milademetan 160 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2527.0704.8702.5NA1488.6
Cohort 11f: Milademetan 160 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2NANANA327.51057.9
Cohort 12e: Milademetan 200 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2707.01019.6769.8NA1448.2
Cohort 13f: Milademetan 200 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2NANANA266.01190.0

[back to top]

Serum Macrophage Inhibitory Cytokine-1 (MIC-1) Fold Change From Baseline Following Administration of Milademetan In Combination With 5-Azacitidine (AZA)

Pharmacodynamic biomarker serum macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 (MIC-1) concentrations were assessed for Cohorts 10e though 13f. Fold change is the ratio of post-baseline MIC-1 values with respect to the baseline values and is the measure of change of MIC-1 from baseline. (NCT02319369)
Timeframe: Day 5 (predose) up to Day 22 (predose), up to approximately 6 years of first participant enrolled

Interventionfold change (Mean)
Day 14 (predose)Day 22 (predose)
Cohort 11f: Milademetan 160 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^24.061.38

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Following Administration of Milademetan Alone and In Combination With 5-Azacitidine (AZA)

A DLT was defined as any treatment-emergent adverse event not attributable to disease or disease-related processes occurring during the observation period (Cycle 1) in each dose-level cohort and is Grade (Gr) 3 or higher according to NCI CTCAE Version 5.0 (Version 4.03 before 01 Apr 2018), with these exceptions: for elevations in hepatic function enzymes, a DLT is defined as: Gr ≥3 aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels lasting >3 days; AST/ALT >5 × ULN if accompanied by ≥Gr 2 elevation in bilirubin. Potential DLTs include: Participants who are unable to complete at least 75% of milademetan or AZA in Cycle 1 as a result of non-disease-related Gr ≥2 events; Persistent bone marrow aplasia in the absence of malignant cell infiltration, and failure to recover a peripheral absolute neutrophil count ≥0.5 × 10^9/L and platelets ≥20 × 10^9/L while withholding study drug, resulting in >2-week delay in initiating Cycle 2. (NCT02319369)
Timeframe: From the date the participant signed the informed consent form up to 5 years of first participant enrolled

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants with TEAEs classified as DLTsNauseaFatigueCellulitisDiarrhoeaHypokalaemiaRenal failureVomitingSyncope
Cohort 1: Milademetan 60 mg100000010
Cohort 12e: Milademetan 200 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2202000001
Cohort 4: Milademetan 160 mg200011000
Cohort 5: Milademetan 210 mg311100100
Cohort 9d: Milademetan 220 mg220000000

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) Following Administration of Milademetan In Combination With 5-Azacitidine (AZA)

Pharmacokinetic parameter time to maximum concentration (Tmax) was assessed at select time points. (NCT02319369)
Timeframe: Predose, 0.5 hour (hr), 1 hr, 2 hr, 3 hr, 6 hr of Cycle 1, Day 1 (AZA); Predose, 0.5 hr, 1 hr, 2 hr, 3 hr, 4 hr, 6-10 hr of Day 5, Day 7 (predose) (Cohorts 10e and 12e), Day 8 (Cohorts 11f and 13f), and Day 14 (Cohorts 10e-13f) (each cycle is 28 days)

,,,
Interventionhours (Median)
Cycle 1, Day 1Cycle 1, Day 5Cycle 1, Day 7Cycle 1, Day 8Cycle 1, Day 14
Cohort 10e: Milademetan 160 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^20.773.020.56NA3.00
Cohort 11f: Milademetan 160 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2NANANA6.336.05
Cohort 12e: Milademetan 200 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^20.514.410.58NA5.54
Cohort 13f: Milademetan 200 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2NANANA3.086.15

[back to top]

Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) Following Administration of Milademetan Alone

Pharmacokinetic parameter plasma concentration before next dose (Ctrough) of milademetan was assessed at Cycle 1, Day 15 and the geometric means (coefficient of variation %) are presented. (NCT02319369)
Timeframe: Predose, 1 hour (hr), 2 hr, 3 hr, 6 hr, 8 hr, 10 hr of Cycle 1, Day 15 (Cohorts 1-5 and 7c) (each cycle is 28 days)

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cohort 1: Milademetan 60 mg197.13
Cohort 2: Milademetan 90 mg229.28
Cohort 3: Milademetan 120 mg292.60
Cohort 4: Milademetan 160 mg184.60
Cohort 5: Milademetan 210 mg507.07
Cohort 7c: Milademetan 160 mgNA

[back to top]

Serum Macrophage Inhibitory Cytokine-1 (MIC-1) Fold Change From Baseline Following Administration of Milademetan In Combination With 5-Azacitidine (AZA)

Pharmacodynamic biomarker serum macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 (MIC-1) concentrations were assessed for Cohorts 10e though 13f. Fold change is the ratio of post-baseline MIC-1 values with respect to the baseline values and is the measure of change of MIC-1 from baseline. (NCT02319369)
Timeframe: Day 5 (predose) up to Day 22 (predose), up to approximately 6 years of first participant enrolled

Interventionfold change (Mean)
Day 22 (predose)
Cohort 13f: Milademetan 200 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^21.83

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve up to 24 Hours (AUC0-24) Following Administration of Milademetan Alone

Pharmacokinetic parameter area under the plasma concentration curve up to 24 hours (AUC0-24) of milademetan was assessed at select time points and the geometric means (coefficient of variation %) are presented. (NCT02319369)
Timeframe: Predose, 1 hour (hr), 2 hr, 3 hr, 6 hr, 8 hr, 10 hr of Cycle 1, Day 1 (Cohorts 1-9d) and Cycle 1, Day 15 (Cohorts 1-5 and 7c) (each cycle is 28 days)

,,,,,,,,
Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 1Cycle 1, Day 15
Cohort 1: Milademetan 60 mg4646.77244.6
Cohort 2: Milademetan 90 mg4478.18392.9
Cohort 3: Milademetan 120 mg6585.49854.9
Cohort 4: Milademetan 160 mg8315.110710.8
Cohort 5: Milademetan 210 mg9794.020330.2
Cohort 6b: Milademetan 160 mg7222.5NA
Cohort 7c: Milademetan 160 mg10165.67714.3
Cohort 8d: Milademetan 160 mg8973.9NA
Cohort 9d: Milademetan 220 mg20893.9NA

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve up to 24 Hours (AUC0-24) Following Administration of Milademetan In Combination With 5-Azacitidine (AZA)

Pharmacokinetic parameter area under the plasma concentration curve up to 24 hours (AUC0-24) was assessed at select time points and the geometric means (coefficient of variation %) are presented. (NCT02319369)
Timeframe: Predose, 0.5 hr, 1 hr, 2 hr, 3 hr, 4 hr, 6-10 hr of Cycle 1, Day 5 (Cohorts 10e and 12e) and Predose of Cycle 1, Day 14 (Cohorts 10e, 11f, and 12e) (each cycle is 28 days)

,,
Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 5Cycle 1, Day 14
Cohort 10e: Milademetan 160 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^28238.722563.8
Cohort 11f: Milademetan 160 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2NA15755.5
Cohort 12e: Milademetan 200 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^221299.319967.5

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) Following Administration of Milademetan Alone

Pharmacokinetic parameter maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of milademetan was assessed at select time points and the geometric means (coefficient of variation %) are presented. (NCT02319369)
Timeframe: Predose, 1 hour (hr), 2 hr, 3 hr, 6 hr, 8 hr, 10 hr of Cycle 1, Day 1 (Cohorts 1-9d) and Cycle 1, Day 15 (Cohorts 1-5 and 7c) (each cycle is 28 days)

,,,,,,,,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 1Cycle 1, Day 15
Cohort 1: Milademetan 60 mg386.0498.5
Cohort 2: Milademetan 90 mg342.5562.6
Cohort 3: Milademetan 120 mg505.9614.3
Cohort 4: Milademetan 160 mg622.3753.8
Cohort 5: Milademetan 210 mg747.91329.2
Cohort 6b: Milademetan 160 mg440.0NA
Cohort 7c: Milademetan 160 mg758.1669.2
Cohort 8d: Milademetan 160 mg657.0NA
Cohort 9d: Milademetan 220 mg1607.4NA

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) Following Administration of Milademetan Alone

Pharmacokinetic parameter time to maximum concentration (Tmax) of milademetan was assessed at select time points. (NCT02319369)
Timeframe: Predose, 1 hour (hr), 2 hr, 3 hr, 6 hr, 8 hr, 10 hr of Cycle 1, Day 1 (Cohorts 1-9d) and Cycle 1, Day 15 (Cohorts 1-5 and 7c) (each cycle is 28 days)

,,,,,,,,
Interventionhours (Median)
Cycle 1, Day 1Cycle 1, Day 15
Cohort 1: Milademetan 60 mg3.003.00
Cohort 2: Milademetan 90 mg4.392.99
Cohort 3: Milademetan 120 mg3.003.00
Cohort 4: Milademetan 160 mg4.502.96
Cohort 5: Milademetan 210 mg3.004.50
Cohort 6b: Milademetan 160 mg3.00NA
Cohort 7c: Milademetan 160 mg3.083.04
Cohort 8d: Milademetan 160 mg4.50NA
Cohort 9d: Milademetan 220 mg4.56NA

[back to top]

Serum Macrophage Inhibitory Cytokine-1 (MIC-1) Fold Change From Baseline Following Administration of Milademetan Alone

Pharmacodynamic biomarker serum macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 (MIC-1) concentrations of milademetan were assessed for Cohorts 1 though 9d. Fold change is the ratio of post-baseline MIC-1 values with respect to the baseline values and is the measure of change of MIC-1 from baseline. (NCT02319369)
Timeframe: Day 1 (6 hours postdose) up to Day 21-22 (predose), up to approximately 6 years of first participant enrolled

,,,,,,,,
Interventionfold change (Mean)
Day 1 (6 hours postdose)Day 2 (predose)Day 8 (predose)Day 15 (predose)Day 21-22 (predose)
Cohort 1: Milademetan 60 mg3.142.534.132.883.49
Cohort 2: Milademetan 90 mg2.783.316.355.644.61
Cohort 3: Milademetan 120 mg3.363.977.416.044.57
Cohort 4: Milademetan 160 mg3.003.445.135.546.57
Cohort 5: Milademetan 210 mg4.255.069.709.285.88
Cohort 6b: Milademetan 160 mg2.642.574.931.330.48
Cohort 7c: Milademetan 160 mg3.363.841.441.131.24
Cohort 8d: Milademetan 160 mg2.643.685.635.020.83
Cohort 9d: Milademetan 220 mg4.948.0913.686.611.18

[back to top]

Number of Participants (≥10%) With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Following Administration of Milademetan Alone and In Combination With 5-Azacitidine (AZA)

A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event that emerges during the treatment period (up to 30 days after last dose), having been absent at pre-treatment; or reemerges during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment; or worsens in severity after starting treatment relative to the pre-treatment state, when the adverse event is continuous. (NCT02319369)
Timeframe: From the date the participant signed the informed consent form up to 30 days after the last dose in the last participant, up to approximately 6 years of first participant enrolled

,,,,,,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any TEAEsNauseaDiarrhoeaVomitingFatigueThrombocytopeniaOedema peripheralAnaemiaDecreased appetiteHypokalaemiaLung infectionNeutropeniaHypomagnesaemiaHypotensionPneumoniaDyspnoeaSepsisAbdominal painAstheniaDehydrationDizzinessFebrile neutropeniaHyperuricaemiaMalaiseCoughConstipationContusionMyalgiaEpistaxisHeadacheHypophosphataemiaMuscular weaknessRash maculo-papularRhinorrhoeaAlanine aminotransferase increasedAthralgiaDeathDepressionDevice-related infectionEscherichia infectionFluid overloadHemorrhoidsHyponatraemiaInsomniaOropharyngeal painPancytopeniaPneumonia fungalPyrexia
Cohort 1: Milademetan 60 mg752222122001023022111121000000000000000000000000
Cohort 10e: Milademetan 160 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2951330103131033323022000422322220111012212012201
Cohort 11f: Milademetan 160 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2322220102030011301001000322101110211200010110011
Cohort 12e: Milademetan 200 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2421023100101011001001000010010003000010000100010
Cohort 13f: Milademetan 200 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2110000000000000000000000010000000000000000000000
Cohort 2: Milademetan 90 mg642111030112121101001010000000000000000000000000
Cohort 3: Milademetan 120 mg1188454432122321210110301000000000000000000000000
Cohort 4: Milademetan 160 mg865455233423113110112110000000000000000000000000
Cohort 5: Milademetan 210 mg543331113301210300212121000000000000000000000000
Cohort 6b: Milademetan 160 mg734221312220200112110001000000000000000000000000
Cohort 7c: Milademetan 160 mg322200100010000010000001000000000000000000000000
Cohort 8d: Milademetan 160 mg643310101010001012000001000000000000000000000000
Cohort 9d: Milademetan 220 mg433311100121010010110000000000000000000000000000

[back to top]

Serum Macrophage Inhibitory Cytokine-1 (MIC-1) Fold Change From Baseline Following Administration of Milademetan In Combination With 5-Azacitidine (AZA)

Pharmacodynamic biomarker serum macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 (MIC-1) concentrations were assessed for Cohorts 10e though 13f. Fold change is the ratio of post-baseline MIC-1 values with respect to the baseline values and is the measure of change of MIC-1 from baseline. (NCT02319369)
Timeframe: Day 5 (predose) up to Day 22 (predose), up to approximately 6 years of first participant enrolled

,
Interventionfold change (Mean)
Day 5 (predose)Day 5 (6 hours postdose)Day 14 (predose)Day 22 (predose)
Cohort 10e: Milademetan 160 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^21.653.1210.822.05
Cohort 12e: Milademetan 200 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^21.396.078.341.81

[back to top]

Duration of Exposure of Entospletinib

(NCT02343939)
Timeframe: First dose date up to approximately 3 years

Interventionweeks (Median)
Group A Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin8.6
Group A Phase 1b/2 ENTO 400 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin7.1
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Decitabine13.7
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine15.4
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Safety Run-In)10.1
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine (Randomized)13.9
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Randomized)10.1
Group C Phase 1b/2 ENTO 400 mg4.4
Group C Phase 1b ENTO 800 mg7.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

DLTs refer to toxicities experienced during the first 28 days of study treatment that have been judged to be clinically significant and related to study treatment. DLT assessment was applicable only for Phase 1b and Phase 2 safety run-in participants. (NCT02343939)
Timeframe: Group A: Cycle 0 Day 1 to Cycle 2 Day 28; Group B: Cycle 0 Day 1 to Cycle 1 Day 28; Group C: Cycle 1 Day 1 to Cycle 1 Day 28 (Cycle length: for Cycle 0 = 14 days, for all other cycles = 28 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group A Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin0
Group A Phase 1b/2 ENTO 400 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin0
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Decitabine0
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine16.7
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Safety Run-In)0
Group C Phase 1b/2 ENTO 400 mg0
Group C Phase 1b ENTO 800 mg16.7

[back to top]

Event Free Survival (EFS)

EFS was defined as the time interval from the start of the study therapy until the date of treatment failure, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) relapse, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants who received other anti-cancer therapy (prior to the event if any) were censored. Median EFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier (KM) method. (NCT02343939)
Timeframe: First dose date up to approximately 38 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Group A Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Cytarabine + DaunorubicinNA
Group A Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin1.9
Group A Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin9.0
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Decitabine2.2
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine2.9
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Safety Run-In)2.3
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine (Randomized)3.2
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Randomized)2.4
Group C Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg1.8
Group C Phase 1b ENTO 800 mg1.8
Group C Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg (Cohort C1A - R/R AML)1.0
Group C Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg (Cohort C2 - MLL)1.0
Group C Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg (Cohort C3 - Untreated AML)1.7

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time interval from the start of the study therapy to death from any cause. Median OS was analyzed using KM method. (NCT02343939)
Timeframe: First dose date up to approximately 38 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Group A Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin37.1
Group A Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin34.1
Group A Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Cytarabine + DaunorubicinNA
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Decitabine3.2
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine5.3
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Safety Run-In)6.9
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine (Randomized)7.3
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Randomized)6.2
Group C Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg5.9
Group C Phase 1b ENTO 800 mg5.6
Group C Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg (Cohort C1A - R/R AML)8.2
Group C Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg (Cohort C2 - MLL)7.9
Group C Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg (Cohort C3 - Untreated AML)2.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

(NCT02343939)
Timeframe: First dose date up to the last dose date plus 30 days (maximum: 18 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group A Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin100.0
Group A Phase 1b/2 ENTO 400 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin100.0
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Decitabine100.0
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine100.0
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Safety Run-In)100.0
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine (Randomized)100.0
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Randomized)100.0
Group C Phase 1b/2 ENTO 400 mg100.0
Group C Phase 1b ENTO 800 mg100.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Composite Complete Remission at the End of Induction

Clinical response was assessed according to the International Working Group criteria (Cheson 2003). Composite complete remission included CR, CRc, and morphologic complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi). CR required all of the following: < 5% blasts in bone marrow aspirate; Neutrophils ≥ 1,000/mcL; Platelets ≥ 100,000/mcL; No extramedullary disease; No blasts with Auer rods detected; and Independent of transfusions. CRc, in addition to CR criteria, required reversion to a normal karyotype with an abnormal karyotype at the time of diagnosis. CRi required all of the CR criteria except the criterion of neutrophils and platelets. (NCT02343939)
Timeframe: At the end of induction (Group A: up to end of Cycle 2; Group B: up to end of Cycle 4) (cycle length = up to 28 days); Group C: From Day 1 until meeting the criteria for study treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 3 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group A Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin100.0
Group A Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin77.8
Group A Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin65.9
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Decitabine40.0
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine50.0
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Safety Run-In)25.0
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine (Randomized)23.5
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Randomized)14.3
Group C Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg14.3
Group C Phase 1b ENTO 800 mg0.0
Group C Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg (Cohort C1A - R/R AML)0.0
Group C Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg (Cohort C2 - MLL)15.4
Group C Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg (Cohort C3 - Untreated AML)11.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Morphologic Complete Remission (CR) at the End of Induction

Clinical response was assessed according to the International Working Group criteria (Cheson 2003). Morphologic CR included CR and cytogenetic CR (CRc). CR required all of the following: < 5% blasts in bone marrow aspirate; Neutrophils ≥ 1,000/microliter (mcL); Platelets ≥ 100,000/mcL; No extramedullary disease; No blasts with Auer rods detected; and Independent of transfusions. CRc, in addition to CR criteria, required reversion to a normal karyotype with an abnormal karyotype at the time of diagnosis. (NCT02343939)
Timeframe: At the end of induction (Group A: up to end of Cycle 2; Group B: up to end of Cycle 4) (cycle length = up to 28 days); Group C: From Day 1 until meeting the criteria for study treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 3 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group A Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin66.7
Group A Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin66.7
Group A Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin46.3
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Decitabine0.0
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine16.7
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Safety Run-In)25.0
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine (Randomized)0.0
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Randomized)7.1
Group C Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg0.0
Group C Phase 1b ENTO 800 mg0.0
Group C Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg (Cohort C1A - R/R AML)0.0
Group C Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg (Cohort C2 - MLL)15.4
Group C Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg (Cohort C3 - Untreated AML)11.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Response at the End of Induction

Clinical response was assessed according to the International Working Group criteria (Cheson 2003). Overall response included CR, CRc, CRi, and partial remission (PR). CR required all of the following: < 5% blasts in bone marrow aspirate; Neutrophils ≥ 1,000/mcL; Platelets ≥ 100,000/mcL; No extramedullary disease; No blasts with Auer rods detected; and Independent of transfusions. CRc, in addition to CR criteria, required reversion to a normal karyotype with an abnormal karyotype at the time of diagnosis. CRi required all of the CR criteria except the criterion of neutrophils and platelets. PR required all of the following: ≥ 50% decrease in blasts in bone marrow aspirate to a range of 5% to 25%; Neutrophils ≥ 1,000/mcL; Platelets ≥ 100,000/mcL; Independent of transfusions; and A value of ≤ 5% blasts was also considered a PR if Auer rods were detected. (NCT02343939)
Timeframe: At the end of induction (Group A: up to end of Cycle 2; Group B: up to end of Cycle 4) (cycle length = up to 28 days); Group C: From Day 1 until meeting the criteria for study treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 3 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group A Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin100.0
Group A Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin77.8
Group A Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin70.7
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Decitabine40.0
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine50.0
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Safety Run-In)25.0
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine (Randomized)23.5
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Randomized)14.3
Group C Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg14.3
Group C Phase 1b ENTO 800 mg0.0
Group C Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg (Cohort C1A - R/R AML)0.0
Group C Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg (Cohort C2 - MLL)15.4
Group C Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg (Cohort C3 - Untreated AML)11.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Laboratory Abnormalities

Treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities were defined as values that increase at least one toxicity grade from baseline. The most severe graded abnormality from all tests was counted for each participant. (NCT02343939)
Timeframe: First dose date up to the last dose date plus 30 days (maximum: 18 months)

,,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Any Laboratory AbnormalityGrade 3 or 4 Laboratory Abnormalities
Group A Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin100100
Group A Phase 1b/2 ENTO 400 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin10098.0
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Decitabine100100
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine100100
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Randomized)10092.9
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Safety Run-In)10085.7
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine (Randomized)94.194.1
Group C Phase 1b ENTO 800 mg10085.7
Group C Phase 1b/2 ENTO 400 mg10082.9

[back to top]

Efficacy of Ibrutinib Monotherapy or in Combination With Either LD-AraC or Azacitidine Using the Overall Remission Rate (Defined as Proportion of Subjects Achieving a CR or CRi) According to the LeukemiaNet Guidelines

Dohner's 2000 Criteria for AML: Complete Response (CR), Bone marrow blasts < 5%; absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; absolute neutrophil count > 1.0 x 109/L (1000/µL); platelet count >100 x 109/L (100 000/µL); independence of red cell transfusions; CR with Incomplete Recovery (CRi), All CR criteria except for residual neutropenia (< 1.0 x 109/L [1000/µL]) or thrombocytopenia (<100 x 109/L [100 000/µL]) ; Morphologic leukemia-free state, Bone marrow blasts < 5%; absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; no hematologic recovery required; Partial Remission (PR), All hematologic criteria of CR; decrease of bone marrow blast percentage to 5% to 25%; and decrease of pretreatment bone marrow blast percentage by at least 50%; Relapse, Bone marrow blasts > 5%; or reappearance of blasts in the blood; or development of extramedullary disease. (NCT02351037)
Timeframe: When the last subject enrolled completes approximately 12 months of treatment.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ibrutinib Monotherapy Cohort0
Ibrutinib + LD-AraC Combination Cohort1
Ibrutinib+Azacitidine Combination Cohort0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Disease-Specific Efficacy Measures in the AML Cohort

Number of participants with CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh), CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi), partial remission (PR), stable disease (SD), and morphologic leukemia free state (MLFS). CRh: neutrophils>5x10^8/L, platelets>5x10^10/L, BMB<5%, no peripheral blasts, no blasts with Auer rods, no extramedullary disease (EMD), not qualifying for CR. CRi: neutrophils <1x10^9/L or platelets<1x10^11/L; BMB <5%, no peripheral blasts, no blasts with Auer rods; no EMD; neutrophils or platelets not recovered; not qualifying for CRh. PR: neutrophils ≥1x10^9/L; platelets ≥1x10^11/L; blasts decreased to 5-25% and ≥50% decrease from pretreatment; blasts≤5% if Auer rod positive. SD: ≥3 months of absence of CR without minimal residual disease (CRMRD-), CR, CRh, CRi, PR, and MLFS, criteria for PD not met. MLFS: neutrophils <1x10^9/L and platelets<1x10^11/L, BMB<5%, no blasts with Auer rods; no EMD; neutrophils and platelets not recovered; not qualifying for CRi (NCT02367456)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 to EoT visit (within 14 days after last dose) (assessed up to 20 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
CRhCRiPRMLFSSD
AML Cohort01216

[back to top]

Number of Participants Meeting Categorical Criteria of QTcF Values in LIC, AML and MDS Cohorts

Number of participants that met categorical criteria of QTcF values in LIC, AML and MDS cohorts (NCT02367456)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 to EoT visit (assessed up to 16 months in the LIC cohort and 24 months in the AML and MDS cohorts)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Maximum QTcF interval <450 ms450 ms <=Maximum QTcF interval <480 ms480 ms <=Maximum QTcF interval <500 msMaximum QTcF interval ≥500 msQTcF maximum increase from baseline <30 ms30 ms <= QTcF maximum increase <60 msQTcF maximum increase from baseline >=60 ms
AML Cohort1665318102
Lead-in Cohort5241372
MDS Cohort186422352

[back to top]

Number of Participants With SAEs in the AML and MDS Cohorts

A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. Treatment-related SAEs were determined by the investigator. AEs were graded by NCI CTCAE version 4.03. (NCT02367456)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 to EoT visit (within 14 days after last dose) (assessed up to 24 months)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
All-causality SAEsTreatment-related SAEs
AML Cohort248
MDS Cohort188

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Glasdegib Dosed in Combination With Azacitidine (C1D7) and When Dosed Alone (C1D15) in the Lead-in Cohort

Maximum plasma concentration of glasdegib dosed in combination with azacitidine (C1D7) and when dosed alone (C1D15) in the Lead-in Cohort was estimated using non-compartmental analysis. (NCT02367456)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 7 and Day 15

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
C1D7C1D15
Lead-in Cohort1013991.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Disease-Specific Efficacy Measures in the MDS Cohort

Number of participants with PR, marrow CR (mCR), SD, complete or partial cytogenetic response, and hematologic improvement (HI). PR: BMB >5% and decreased by ≥50% (at least 4 weeks), meeting all CR criteria if abnormal before treatment except BMB. mCR: BMB ≤5% and decreased by ≥50%. SD: failure to achieve PR, no evidence of progression. Complete or partial cytogenic response: disappearance of chromosomal abnormality without new ones, or ≥ 50% reduction of chromosomal abnormality. HI: erythroid response (pretreatment <11g/dL): hemoglobin increase by≥1.5 g/dL, relevant reduction of units of red blood cell transfusions by at least 4 transfusions/8 weeks compared to pretreatment transfusion number in previous 8 weeks; platelet response (pretreatment <1x10^11/L): increase of ≥30x10^9/L if starting with >20x10^9/L, and increase from <20x10^9/L to >20x10^9/L and by at least 100%; neutrophil response (pretreatment <1x10^9/L): at least a 100% increase, absolute increase >0.5x10^9/L. (NCT02367456)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 to EoT visit (within 14 days after last dose) (assessed up to 22 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PRmCRSDComplete cytogenetic responsePartial cytogenetic responseHI of at least 1 lineageHI of at least 1 lineage without CR or PR
MDS Cohort3583193

[back to top]

Duration of CR in the AML and MDS Cohorts

Duration of CR was defined as the duration from date of first achieving CR to the date of disease progression (relapse) after CR, or death due to any cause. Participants last known to be alive who were free from disease progression or relapse after CR were censored at the date of the last assessment that verified their disease status. Duration of CR was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Disease progression was defined as: percentage of bone marrow blasts increased by ≥50% to >5% (for participants with <5% blasts at screening), >10% (for participants with 5-10% blasts at screening), >20% (for participants with 11-20% blasts at screening) or >30% (for participants with 21-30% blasts at screening), and with any of the following condition: at least 50% decrease from maximum remission/response in granulocytes or platelets; reduction in hemoglobin by ≥2 g/dL; transfusion dependence. (NCT02367456)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 to EoT visit (within 14 days after last dose) (assessed up to 24 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
AML Cohort4.73
MDS Cohort3.71

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Remission (CR) + Partial Remission (PR) in the LIC

RR (Percentage of participants achieving CR+PR among all the enrolled and treated patients as defined by modified International Working Group (IWG) criteria (2006)) in the LIC. CR was defined as having responses of hemoglobin ≥11 g/dL, neutrophils ≥1 x 10^9/L, platelets ≥1 x 10^11/L, percentage of blasts = 0%, percentage of BMB≤5%, and normal maturation of all cell lines (note if has persistent dysplasia), and all responses must last at least 4 weeks. PR was defined as meeting all CR criteria if abnormal before treatment except BMB, percentage of BMB decreased by ≥50% but still >5% for at least 4 weeks. (NCT02367456)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 to last follow up visit (at least 28 days after discontinuation of treatment) (assessed up to 18 months)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Lead-in Cohort25.0

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Median Overall Survival (OS) in the AML and MDS Cohorts

Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from date of first study treatment to date of death from any cause. Patients last known to be alive were to be censored at the date of last contact. OS was analyzed and displayed graphically for each expansion cohort separately using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median event time and corresponding two-sided 95%CI were provided for each cohort. OS was first analyzed when the primary endpoint of CR was analyzed in the respective expansion cohort. (NCT02367456)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 to date of death from any cause (assessed up to 24 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
AML Cohort9.2
MDS Cohort15.8

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Azacitidine Dosed in Combination With Glasdegib (C1D7) and When Dosed Alone (C1D1) in the Lead-in Cohort

Maximum plasma concentration of azacitidine dosed in combination with glasdegib (C1D7) and when dosed alone (C1D1) in the Lead-in Cohort was estimated using non-compartmental analysis. (NCT02367456)
Timeframe: 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1; pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 7.

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
C1D1C1D7
Lead-in Cohort778.5716.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Remission (CR) in the AML and MDS Cohorts

"Percentage of participants achieving CR as defined by the 2017 European Leukemia Net (ELN) Response Criteria for all participants with AML and modified International Working Group (IWG) criteria (2006) for all participants with MDS in the expansion cohorts.~For AML cohort, CR was defined as neutrophils ≥ 1 x 10^9/L, platelets ≥ 1 x 10^11/L, percentage of bone marrow blasts (BMB) <5% with no peripheral blasts and no blasts with Auer rods, no extramedullary disease (EMD), and transfusion independent.~For MDS cohort, CR was defined as having responses of hemoglobin ≥11 g/dL, neutrophils ≥1 x 10^9/L, platelets ≥1 x 10^11/L, percentage of blasts = 0%, percentage of BMB≤5%, and normal maturation of all cell lines (note if has persistent dysplasia), and all responses must last at least 4 weeks." (NCT02367456)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 to End of Treatment (EoT) visit (within 14 days after last dose) (assessed up to 22 months)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
AML Cohort20.0
MDS Cohort13.3

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Azacitidine Dosed in Combination With Glasdegib (C1D7) and When Dosed Alone (C1D1) in the Lead-in Cohort

Area under the plasma concentration curve from time zero to extrapolated infinite time (AUCinf) of azacitidine dosed in combination with glasdegib (C1D7) and when dosed alone (C1D1) in the Lead-in Cohort was estimated using non-compartmental analysis. (NCT02367456)
Timeframe: 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1; pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 7.

Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
C1D1C1D7
Lead-in Cohort13191260

[back to top]

Time to CR in the AML and MDS Cohorts

Time to CR was defined for participants in the expansion cohorts who had achieved response on study as the time from date of the first dose of study drug to date of the first documentation of response. Time to CR was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02367456)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 to EoT visit (within 14 days after last dose) (assessed up to 24 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
AML Cohort5.54
MDS Cohort4.39

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve From Time Zero to End of Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Glasdegib Dosed in Combination With Azacitidine (C1D7) and When Dosed Alone (C1D15) in the Lead-in Cohort

Area under the plasma concentration curve from time zero to end of dosing interval (AUCtau) of glasdegib dosed in combination with azacitidine (C1D7) and when dosed alone (C1D15) in the Lead-in Cohort was estimated using non-compartmental analysis. (NCT02367456)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 7 and Day 15

Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
C1D7C1D15
Lead-in Cohort1323014350

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Efficacy Measures Other Than CR in the LIC

Number of participants with efficacy measures other than CR as defined by modified IWG criteria (2006) in LIC, including marrow CR(mCR), stable disease(SD), hematologic improvement(HI). CR: hemoglobin≥11 g/dL, neutrophils≥1 x 10^9/L, platelets≥1 x 10^11/L, percentage of blasts=0%, percentage of BMB≤5%, normal maturation of all cell lines (note if has persistent dysplasia), all responses last at least 4 weeks. mCR: BMB≤5% & decreased by≥50%. SD: failure to achieve PR, no evidence of progression. HI: erythroid response (pretreatment<11g/dL): hemoglobin increase by≥1.5 g/dL, relevant reduction of units of red blood cell transfusions by at least 4 transfusions/8 weeks compared to pretreatment transfusion number in previous 8 weeks; platelet response (pretreatment<1x10^11/L): increase of≥30x10^9/L if starting with >20x10^9/L, and increase from <20x10^9/L to >20x10^9/L and by at least 100%; neutrophil response (pretreatment<1x10^9/L): at least a 100% increase, absolute increase >0.5x10^9/L (NCT02367456)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 to last follow up visit (at least 28 days after discontinuation of treatment) (assessed up to 18 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Marrow CR (mCR)Stable disease (SD)Hematologic improvement (HI) of at least 1 lineage
Lead-in Cohort246

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in the AML and MDS Cohorts

Laboratory parameters included: hematology parameters (activated partial thromboplastin time, hemoglobin, INR, lymphocyte count, neutrophil count, platelet count, white blood cell), chemistry parameters (alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline aminotransferase, blood bilirubin, CPK, creatinine, calcium, blood glucose, potassium, magnesium, sodium, albumin, phosphate). Laboratory abnormalities were graded by NCI CTCAE version 4.03. (NCT02367456)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 to EoT visit (within 14 days after last dose) (assessed up to 24 months)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Activated partial thromboplastin time prolongedAnemiaHemoglobin increasedINR increasedLymphocyte count decreasedLymphocyte count increasedNeutrophil count decreasedPlatelet count decreasedWhite blood cell decreasedAlanine aminotransferase increasedAlkaline phosphatase increasedAspartate aminotransferase increasedBlood bilirubin increasedCPK increasedCreatinine increasedHypercalcemiaHyperglycemiaHyperkalemiaHypermagnesemiaHypernatremiaHypoalbuminemiaHypocalcemiaHypoglycemiaHypokalemiaHypomagnesemiaHyponatremiaHypophosphatemia
AML Cohort030002362529221371135293361222348121813
MDS Cohort02901231252627127810428046211711239127

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in the LIC

Laboratory parameters included: hematology parameters (activated partial thromboplastin time, hemoglobin, INR, lymphocyte count, neutrophil count, platelet count, white blood cell), chemistry parameters (alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline aminotransferase, blood bilirubin, CPK, creatinine, calcium, blood glucose, potassium, magnesium, sodium, albumin, phosphate). Grades of laboratory abnormalities were defined by NCI CTCAE version 4.03. (NCT02367456)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 to last follow up visit (at least 28 days after discontinuation of treatment) (assessed up to 17 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Activated partial thromboplastin time prolongedAnemiaHemoglobin increasedINR increasedLymphocyte count decreasedLymphocyte count increasedNeutrophil count decreasedPlatelet count decreasedWhite blood cell decreasedAlanine aminotransferase increasedAlkaline phosphatase increaseAspartate aminotransferase increasedBlood bilirubin increasedCPK increasedCreatinine increasedHypercalcemiaHyperglycemiaHyperkalemiaHypermagnesemiaHypernatremiaHypoalbuminemiaHypocalcemiaHypoglycemiaHypokalemiaHypomagnesemiaHyponatremiaHypophosphatemia
Lead-in Cohort51208931012114026011113215313264

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in the LIC

An serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. Treatment-related SAEs were determined by the investigator. Grades of AEs were defined by NCI CTCAE version 4.03. (NCT02367456)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 up to 28 days after last dose of study drug or beginning of new anti-cancer therapy (assessed up to 16 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
All-causality SAEsTreatment-related SAEs
Lead-in Cohort97

[back to top]

Number of Participants With TEAEs in the AML and MDS Cohorts

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study treatment. TEAEs were AEs that occurred after initiation of treatment or AEs increasing in severity during treatment. Treatment-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator. AEs were graded by NCI CTCAE version 4.03. (NCT02367456)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 to EoT visit (within 14 days after last dose) (assessed up to 24 months)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
All-causality TEAEsTreatment-related TEAEs
AML Cohort3029
MDS Cohort3029

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) in the Lead-in Cohort (LIC)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study treatment. TEAEs were AEs that occurred after initiation of treatment or AEs increasing in severity during treatment. Treatment-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator. Grades of AEs were defined by NCI CTCAE version 4.03. (NCT02367456)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 up to 28 days after last dose of study drug or beginning of new anti-cancer therapy (assessed up to 16 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
All-causality TEAEsTreatment-related TEAEsMaximum Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs
Lead-in Cohort12128

[back to top]

Time to First Occurrence of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Glasdegib Dosed in Combination With Azacitidine (C1D7) and When Dosed Alone (C1D15) in the Lead-in Cohort

Time to first occurrence of maximum plasma concentration of glasdegib dosed in combination with azacitidine (C1D7) and when dosed alone (C1D15) in the Lead-in Cohort was estimated using non-compartmental analysis. (NCT02367456)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 0.25, 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 7 and Day 15

Interventionhr (Median)
C1D7C1D15
Lead-in Cohort1.0501.500

[back to top]

Tmax of Azacitidine Dosed in Combination With Glasdegib (C1D7) and When Dosed Alone (C1D1) in the Lead-in Cohort

Time to first occurrence of maximum plasma concentration of azacitidine dosed in combination with glasdegib (C1D7) and when dosed alone (C1D1) in the Lead-in Cohort was estimated using non-compartmental analysis. (NCT02367456)
Timeframe: 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1; pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 7.

Interventionhr (Median)
C1D1C1D7
Lead-in Cohort0.50000.5000

[back to top]

Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of Glasdegib on C1D15 and C2D1 in the AML and MDS Cohorts

Trough plasma concentration was defined as the estimated lowest concentration before next dose administration. (NCT02367456)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 1 and 4 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 and Cycle 2 Day 1.

,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
C1D15C2D1
AML Cohort468.440462.806
MDS Cohort308.144167.483

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as any AEs that begin or worsen with an onset date on or after the date of the first dose of IP through 28 days after the last dose. A serious AE (SAE) = any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. The severity of AEs were graded based on the participant's symptoms according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.0); AEs were evaluated for severity as follows: Grade 1 = Mild - transient or mild discomfort; no medical intervention required; Grade 2 = Moderate - mild to moderate limitation in activity; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life threatening; Grade 5 = Death. (NCT02374099)
Timeframe: Randomization to 28 days after the last dose of IP; those AEs known at any time thereafter being related to IP; up to the last subject last visit of 21 November 2017; TEAE follow-up occurred up to 155 weeks and 2 days

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TEAEGrade 3 or 4 TEAEGrade 5 TEAE (Death)Serious TEAETEAE Leading to Stopping of Any IPTEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of any IPTEAE Leading to Dose Interruption of any IPTreatment Related TEAETreatment Related TEAE Grade 3 or 4 TEAETreatment Related TEAE Grade 5 DeathTreatment Related Serious TEAE
CC-486 and Fulvestrant4632210141922462904
Fulvestrant45151710331200

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Confirmed CR, PR or Stable Disease (SD) for ≥ 24 Weeks (Clinical Benefit Rate) by Investigator Assessment

Percentage of participants with CR or PR or SD was defined per RECIST criteria v 1.1 as a CR that includes a disappearance of all target lesions, a PR was defined as having at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions from baseline and SD as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase of lesions to qualify for progressive disease. The two-sided 95% exact binomial CI each arm was estimated by the Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT02374099)
Timeframe: Disease response was assessed every 8 weeks, for the first 24 weeks, then every 12 weeks until DP; from date of randomization of study drug to the data cut-off date of 13 December 2016; follow-up for clinical benefit response was 21 months

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
CC-486 and Fulvestrant31.3
Fulvestrant30.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) to Treatment (Objective Response Rate) Based On the Investigator Assessment

Overall response rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a confirmed complete response or partial response based on RECIST Version 1.1 criteria. RECIST criteria v 1.1 defined a CR as the disappearance of all target lesions and a PR with at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions from baseline. The two-sided 95% exact binomial CI for each arm was estimated by the Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT02374099)
Timeframe: Disease response was assessed every 8 weeks, for the first 24 weeks, then every 12 weeks until DP; from date of randomization of study drug to data cut-off date of 13 December 2016; follow-up for overall response was 21 months

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
CC-486 and Fulvestrant8.3
Fulvestrant2.0

[back to top]

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Duration of Response (DoR)

Duration of response was defined as the time from the first tumor assessment when the confirmed CR/PR criterion was first met to the date of disease progression, based on investigator's assessment following RECIST Version 1.1 criteria. (NCT02374099)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization of study drug to the data cut-off of 13 December 2016; follow up for duration of response was 21 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
CC-486 and FulvestrantNA
FulvestrantNA

[back to top]

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death (from any cause). All participants who were lost to follow up prior to the end of the study or who were withdrawn from the study were censored at the time of last contact. (NCT02374099)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization of study drug to the data cut off date of 13 December 2016; participants were followed for overall survival for 21 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
CC-486 and FulvestrantNA
FulvestrantNA

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival was defined as the duration from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression (DP) based on investigator's assessment using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 or death (from any cause), whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, progressive disease (PD) was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions from nadir or appearance of a new lesion. (NCT02374099)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization of study drug to the date of the cut off date of 13 December 2016; follow-up for PFS was 21 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
CC-486 and Fulvestrant5.49
Fulvestrant5.46

[back to top]

Participants With an Objective Response

Objective Response Rate (ORR) will be monitored using the Bayesian approach of Thall, Simon, Estey and the extension by Thall and Sung. Overall response rate (ORR), defined as complete remission (CR) + CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) + CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) + partial response (PR) + marrow clearance of blasts + hematological improvement within 3 months of treatment initiation among adult patients with refractory/relapsed Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) (Phase II) (NCT02399917)
Timeframe: Up to 3 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 1b Lead-in Cohort 12
Phase 1b Lead-in Cohort 21
Phase 22

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival

Disease Free Survival (DFS) is defined: Time from date of treatment start until the date of first objective documentation of disease-relapse (NCT02399917)
Timeframe: Up to 2.5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 27.7

[back to top]

Duration of Response

The date of Objective Response to the date of loss of response or last follow-up. (NCT02399917)
Timeframe: Up to 2.5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 27.7

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose of Iirilumab in Combination With 5-azacitidine

To identify the dose at which <2/6 participants experience Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT). The dose level at which 0-1/6 participants experience a DLT in the first 28 days of treatment will be the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and would be used to treat an additional 34 participants in the phase II potion of the study. (Part A, Lead-In Phase) (NCT02399917)
Timeframe: Up to 28 days

Interventionmg/kg (Number)
All Phase 1 Participants3.0

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall Survival (OS) is defined: Time of presentation to date of death or censored at last follow-up date. (NCT02399917)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 23.5

[back to top]

Duration of Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (death date - randomization date + 1). For a participant who was not known to have died by the end of study follow-up, OS was censored at the date of last contact (date of last contact - randomized date + 1). The date of last contact was the latest date that the participant was known to be alive by the cutoff date. The last contact date was derived for participants alive at the analysis cutoff date. Survival rate and 95% CI were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Greenwood formula. (NCT02421939)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 17 Sep 2018, median time of follow-up for OS was 17.8 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Gilteritinib9.3
Salvage Chemotherapy5.6

[back to top]

Duration of Leukemia-Free Survival (LFS)

The LFS was defined as the time from the date of first CRc until the date of documented relapse (excluding relapse from PR) or death for participants who achieved CRc (relapse date or death date - first CRc disease assessment date + 1). For a participant who was not known to have relapsed or died, LFS was censored on the date of last relapse-free disease assessment date (last relapse-free disease assessment date - first CRc disease assessment date + 1). For a participant who was not known to have relapsed or died, LFS was censored on the date of last relapse-free disease assessment date (last relapse-free disease assessment date - first CRc disease assessment date + 1). (NCT02421939)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 17 Sep 2018, median time of follow-up for OS was 17.8 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Gilteritinib4.4
Salvage Chemotherapy6.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Underwent Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant

Transplantation rate is defined as the percentage of participants undergoing Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) during the study period. (NCT02421939)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 17 Sep 2018, median time of follow-up for OS was 17.8 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Gilteritinib25.5
Salvage Chemotherapy15.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

"A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE observed after starting administration of the study drug (gilteritinib or salvage chemotherapy). If the AE occurred on day 1 and the onset check box was marked Onset after first dose of study drug or the onset check box was left blank, then the AE was considered treatment emergent. If the AE occurred on day 1 and the onset check box was marked Onset before first dose of study drug, then the AE was not considered treatment emergent. Majority of salvage chemotherapy participants finished the study by cycle 2 of treatment, the duration of exposure was longer in the gilteritinib arm compared with the salvage chemotherapy arm (126.00 [4.0, 885.0] days versus 28.0 [5.0, 217.0] days). The NCI-CTCAE is defined as National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events." (NCT02421939)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug (median treatment duration for gilteritinib was (126.00 [4.0, 885.0]) days versus salvage chemotherapy 28.0 [5.0, 217.0] days)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Drug-related TEAESerious TEAEDrug-related serious TEAETEAE leading to deathDrug-related TEAE leading to deathTEAE leading to withdrawal of treatmentDrug-related TEAE lead withdrawal of treatmentNCI-CTCAE Grade 3 or higher TEAEDrug-related Grade 3 or higher TEAEDeath
Gilteritinib2062058871105827236153170
Salvage Chemotherapy713416165135945781

[back to top]

Duration of Event-Free Survival (EFS)

"EFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of documented relapse (excluding relapse after PR), treatment failure or death from any cause within 30 days after the last dose of study drug, whichever occurred first (earliest of [relapse date, treatment failure date, death date] - randomization date + 1). If a participant experienced relapse or death within 30 days after the last dose of study drug, the participant was defined as having an EFS event related to either relapse or death, and the event date was the date of relapse or death. For a participant who was not known to have had a relapse or treatment failure or death event, EFS was censored at the date of last relapse-free disease assessment (last relapse-free disease assessment date - randomization date + 1). Data was estimated based on Kaplan-Meier estimates." (NCT02421939)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 17 Sep 2018, median time of follow-up for OS was 17.8 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Gilteritinib2.8
Salvage Chemotherapy0.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR) Rate

The CR rate was defined as the number of participants who achieved the best response of CR divided by the number of participants in the analysis population. (NCT02421939)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 17 Sep 2018, all participants included in the primary analysis of CR rate were followed up at least 6 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Gilteritinib21.1
Salvage Chemotherapy10.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR) With Partial Hematological Recovery (CRh)

CRh rate was defined as the number of participants who achieved CRh at any of the postbaseline visits and did not have a best response of CR divided by the number of participants in the analysis population. (NCT02421939)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 17 Sep 2018, median time of follow-up for OS was 17.8 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Gilteritinib34.0
Salvage Chemotherapy15.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Composite Complete Remission (CRc Rate)

CRc rate was defined as the number of participants who achieved the best response of CRc (CR,complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) or complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) divided by the number of participants in the analysis population. (NCT02421939)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 17 Sep 2018, median time of follow-up for OS was 17.8 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Gilteritinib54.3
Salvage Chemotherapy21.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission and Complete Remission With Partial Hematological Recovery (CR/CRh) in the Gilteritinib Arm

The CR/CRh rate was defined as the number of participants who achieved either CR or CRh at any of the postbaseline visits divided by the number of participants in the analysis population. (NCT02421939)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date 04 Aug 2017, the 142 patients included in the primary analysis of CR/CRh rate were followed up at least 112 days

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
CR/CRh rateCR rateCRh rate
Gilteritinib28.219.09.2

[back to top]

Duration of Remission

Duration of remission included duration of composite complete remission (CRc), duration of complete remission (CR)/ complete remission with partial hematologic recovery (CRh), duration of CRh, duration of CR and duration of response (CRc + partial remission (PR). The duration of response was defined as the time from the date of either first CRc or PR until the date of documented relapse (i.e., the date of first NR after CRc or PR) for participants who achieved CRc or PR (relapse date - first CRc or PR disease assessment date + 1). Participants who died without report of relapse were considered nonevents and censored at their last relapse-free disease assessment date (last relapse-free disease assessment date - first CRc or PR disease assessment date + 1). Other participants who did not relapse during the study were considered nonevents and censored at the last relapse-free assessment date. Duration of CR was only applicable to participants with best overall response of CR. (NCT02421939)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 17 Sep 2018, median time of follow-up for OS was 17.8 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Gilteritinib14.8
Salvage Chemotherapy1.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)

The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) is a screening tool designed to assess the severity and impact of fatigue on daily functioning of participants with cancer during the 24 hours. There are 9 items on the scale. The first three questions ask participants to rate their fatigues on a scale from 0 (no fatigue) - 10 (as bad as you can imagine), with higher scores indicating worse outcome. The remaining six questions ask participants to rate how much fatigue has interfered with their daily activities on a scale from 0 (Does not interfere) to 10 (Completely interferes). A global fatigue score can be obtained by averaging all the items on the BFI. The global BFI score will be calculated only if at least 5 of the 9 items are answered. A higher BFI fatigue score indicates worse outcome. (NCT02421939)
Timeframe: Baseline and cycle 1, day 8 and cycle 2 day 1 (up to data cut off date of 17 Sep 2018)

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 1 day 8 (C1D8)Cycle 2 day 1 (C2D1)
Gilteritinib-0.40.0
Salvage Chemotherapy1.00.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Transfusion Conversion and Maintenance

Transfusion conversion & maintenance rate was defined for gilteritinib arm. Participants were classified as transfusion independent if there were no RBC or platelet transfusions within 28 days prior to the first dose to 28 days after the first dose; otherwise they were classified as transfusion dependent at baseline. Participants were considered independent postbaseline if they had 1 consecutive 8 week period without any RBC or platelet transfusion from 29 days after the first dose until the last dose date. For participants who were on treatment ≤ 4 weeks or > 4 weeks but < 12 weeks and there was no RBC or platelet transfusion within postbaseline period, they were considered not evaluable; otherwise, they were considered postbaseline transfusion dependent. Transfusion conversion rate was defined for participants who had evaluable postbaseline transfusion status. Transfusion status (independent vs. dependent) at baseline and postbaseline was reported in a 2 by 2 contingency table. (NCT02421939)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 17 Sep 2018, median treatment duration for gilteritinib was (126.00 [4.0, 885.0]) days versus salvage chemotherapy 28.0 [5.0, 217.0] days)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Baseline Independent/ Post baseline IndependentBaseline Independent/Post baseline DependentBaseline Independent/Post baseline Not EvaluableBaseline Dependent/Post baseline IndependentBaseline Dependent/Post baseline DependentBaseline Dependent/Post baseline Not Evaluable
Gilteritinib59.224.516.334.555.89.6

[back to top] [back to top]

Median Time to Relapse

Time to relapse is defined as the length of time after beginning treatment until the participant has experienced a relapse in disease, measured in months. (NCT02458235)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine/Donor Lymphocyte Infusion3

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Serious Infection

The proportion of participants will be reported for Grade 3-4 invasive fungal infection or disease caused by viral infections (NCT02458235)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Azacitidine/Donor Lymphocyte Infusion0.41

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Severe Hematologic Toxicity Including Graft Failure

The proportion of participants will be reported for Grade 4 severe hematologic toxicities including graft failure (NCT02458235)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Azacitidine/Donor Lymphocyte Infusion0.00

[back to top]

Relapse Rate

Relapse rate will be estimated using a percentage of participants who relapsed. It is assumed that the rate of relapse in pediatric acute leukemia post-transplant would be 40%, azacitidine +/- Donor Lymphocyte Infusion (DLI) would reduce the 2-year relapse rate by approximately 40% to a rate of 25%. (NCT02458235)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Azacitidine/Donor Lymphocyte Infusion23.5

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Acute and Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)

Proportion of participants with Grade 3-4 acute GVHD and moderate to severe chronic GVHD will be reported. (NCT02458235)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Acute GVHDModerate to severe chronic GVHD
Azacitidine/Donor Lymphocyte Infusion0.1760.411

[back to top]

Median Relapse-free Survival

Release-free survival rate is defined as the median length of time after beginning treatment that the participant survives without progression or relapse, reported in months (NCT02458235)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine/Donor Lymphocyte Infusion22

[back to top]

Number of Participants Whom Had >2 Dose Reductions for Any Reason

The number of participants whom had greater than 2 dose reductions for any reason. (NCT02458235)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Azacitidine/Donor Lymphocyte Infusion0

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival at 2 Years Post-transplant

Number of participants without evidence of progression of underlying malignancy for which the transplant was performed, assessed at 2 years post-transplant. (NCT02497404)
Timeframe: 2 years post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
5 Azacytidine13

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival at 1 Year Post-transplant

Number of participants without evidence of progression of underlying malignancy for which the transplant was performed, assessed at 1 year post-transplant. (NCT02497404)
Timeframe: 1 year post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
5 Azacytidine18

[back to top]

Overall Survival at 6 Months Post-transplant

Number of participants alive at 6 months post-transplant (NCT02497404)
Timeframe: 6 months post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
5 Azacytidine35

[back to top]

Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD)

Number of patients who develop acute graft-versus-host disease of any grade. (NCT02497404)
Timeframe: 2 years post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
5 Azacytidine13

[back to top]

Overall Survival at 2 Years Post-Transplant

Number of participants alive at 2 years post-transplant (NCT02497404)
Timeframe: 2 years post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
5 Azacytidine15

[back to top]

Overall Survival at 1 Year Post-Transplant

Number of participants alive at 1 year post-transplant (NCT02497404)
Timeframe: 1 year post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
5 Azacytidine25

[back to top]

High-Risk Extensive Chronic Graft-versus-Host-Disease

Number of patients who develop high-risk extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease. Extensive chronic GVHD is defined as generalized skin or multiple organ involvement. High risk chronic GVHD is defined as platelet count of less than 100k/microL (NCT02497404)
Timeframe: 2 years post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
5 Azacytidine2

[back to top]

Graft Failure

Number of patients who experience graft failure, defined as the absence of neutrophil engraftment by Day +21 or a drop in the absolute neutrophil count to <0.3 cells/microL for five consecutive days occurring after initial neutrophil engraftment within the first 3 weeks post-transplantation. (NCT02497404)
Timeframe: 21 days post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
5 Azacytidine1

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival at 6 Months Post-transplant

Number of participants without evidence of progression of underlying malignancy for which the transplant was performed, assessed at 6 months post-transplant (NCT02497404)
Timeframe: 6 months post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
5 Azacytidine25

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as any adverse event (AE) or serious adverse event (SAE) that occurred or worsened on or after the day of the first dose of the investigational product (IP) through 28 days after the last dose of IP. In addition, any SAE with an onset date more than 28 day after the last dose of IP that was assessed by the investigator as related to IP was considered a TEAE. The severity of AEs was graded based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.0 and based on the following scale: Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate Grade 3 = Severe Grade 4 = Life threatening Grade 5 = Death. (NCT02546986)
Timeframe: From date of first dose of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of IP; overall maximum treatment duration was 61 weeks for the CC-486 + PBZ arm and 60 weeks for the PBZ + Placebo arm

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any TEAEAny TEAE Related to Study DrugAny Serious TEAEAny Serious TEAE Related to Study DrugAny CTC Grade 3/4 TEAEAny CTC Grade 3/4 TEAE Related to Study DrugAny TEAE Leading to DeathAny TEAE Leading to Dose ReductionAny TEAE Leading to Dose InterruptionAny TEAE Leading to Drug Discontinuation
CC-486 and Pembrolizumab (CC-486 + PBZ)5147311240256103220
Placebo and Pembrolizumab (PBO + PBZ)4937276271091208

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Best Overall Response of Complete Response or Partial Response

"The best overall response is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved an objective confirmed complete response or partial response according to RECIST v1.1, compared with baseline where baseline was the last computed tomography (CT) scan obtained prior to or on day 1 of study treatment.~RECIST v1.1 is defined as:~Complete response: disappearance of all target lesions~Partial response: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions from baseline~Stable disease: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase of lesions to qualify for progressive disease~Progressive Disease (PD): at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions from nadir or appearance of a new lesion." (NCT02546986)
Timeframe: Response was assessed every 6 weeks for the first 24 weeks, then every 9 weeks until DP, new anticancer initiation, or withdrawal of consent; maximum treatment exposure for CC-486 + PBZ was 61 weeks and 60 weeks for PBZ + PBO

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
CC-486 and Pembrolizumab (CC-486 + PBZ)19.6
Placebo and Pembrolizumab (PBO + PBZ)14.3

[back to top]

Terminal Phase of Half-life (T1/2) of CC-486

Terminal phase half-life in plasma, calculated as [(ln 2)/λz]. t1/2 was only be calculated when a reliable estimate for λz could be obtained. (NCT02546986)
Timeframe: PK blood samples collected at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6 and 8 hours after CC-486 administration on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1

Interventionhours (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 2 Day 1
CC-486 and Pembrolizumab (CC-486 + PBZ)0.70.9

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of CC-486

Time to maximum observed plasma concentration obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time data. (NCT02546986)
Timeframe: PK blood samples collected at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6 and 8 hours after CC-486 administration on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1

Interventionhours (Median)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 2 Day 1
CC-486 and Pembrolizumab (CC-486 + PBZ)1.51.5

[back to top]

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on European Medicines Agency Methodology

Progression-free survival was defined according to EMA methodology as the time from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 (documented by computed tomography scan result, not including symptomatic deterioration) or death for (any cause) on or prior to the data cutoff date, whichever occurred earlier. Participants who did not have disease progression or had not died were censored at the last known time that the participant was progression free. However, occasional missing observations or initiation of subsequent new anticancer therapy would not result in censoring for this analysis. Progressive disease is at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions from nadir or appearance of a new lesion. (NCT02546986)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of study drug treatment to the date of disease progression; up to the clinical cut-off date of 12 April 2017; overall maximum treatment duration was 61 weeks for the CC-486 + PBZ arm and 60 weeks for the PBZ + Placebo arm

Interventionmonths (Median)
CC-486 and Pembrolizumab (CC-486 + PBZ)2.9
Placebo and Pembrolizumab (PBO + PBZ)4.0

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUCt) of CC-486

Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from Time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration, calculated by linear trapezoidal method when concentrations are increasing and the logarithmic trapezoidal method when concentrations are decreasing. (NCT02546986)
Timeframe: PK blood samples collected at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6 and 8 hours after CC-486 administration on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1

Interventionng·h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 2 Day 1
CC-486 and Pembrolizumab (CC-486 + PBZ)152.3196.6

[back to top]

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Overall Survival

Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time in months between day 1 of treatment and death from any cause. Participants who were still alive as of the clinical cut-off date had their OS censored at the date of last contact or clinical cut-off, whichever was earlier. Participants who were lost to follow-up prior to the end of the study or who were withdrawn from the study were censored at the time of last contact. (NCT02546986)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of treatment up to the clinical cut-off date of 12 April 2017, whichever occurred earlier; median follow-up time for OS was 11.3 months in the CC-486 + PBZ arm and 12.2 months in the PBZ + Placebo arm

Interventionmonths (Median)
CC-486 and Pembrolizumab (CC-486 + PBZ)11.9
Placebo and Pembrolizumab (PBO + PBZ)NA

[back to top]

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Methodology

PFS was defined according to the FDA Methodology as the time in months from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 (documented by computed tomography scan, not including symptomatic deterioration) or death for (any cause) on or prior to the clinical cutoff date, whichever occurred earlier. Those who did not have disease progression or had not died as of the data cutoff date were censored at the time of the last radiologic assessment where the participant was documented to be progression-free prior to the data cutoff date. Progressive disease includes at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions from nadir or appearance of a new lesion. (NCT02546986)
Timeframe: From Day 1 of study drug treatment to the date of disease progression; up to the clinical cut-off date of 12 April 2017; overall maximum treatment duration was 61 weeks for the CC-486 + PBZ arm and 60 weeks for the PBZ + Placebo arm

Interventionmonths (Median)
CC-486 and Pembrolizumab (CC-486 + PBZ)2.9
Placebo and Pembrolizumab (PBO + PBZ)4.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) or Stable Disease (SD) for a Minimum Duration of 18 Weeks Compared to Baseline

"Disease control rate was defined as the percentage of participants who had confirmed stable disease, complete or partial response during the course of study, according to RECIST v1.1, as evaluated by the investigator.~RECIST v 1.1 is defined as:~Complete response: disappearance of all target lesions~Partial response: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions from baseline~Stable disease: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase of lesions to qualify for progressive disease~Progressive Disease (PD): at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions from nadir or appearance of a new lesion. When stable disease was believed to be the best response, it must have met the minimum duration of 10 weeks from randomization." (NCT02546986)
Timeframe: Response was assessed every 6 weeks for the first 24 weeks, then every 9 weeks until DP, new anticancer initiation, or withdrawal of consent; maximum treatment exposure for CC-486 + PBZ was 61 weeks and 60 weeks for PBO +PBZ

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
CC-486 and Pembrolizumab (CC-486 + PBZ)25.5
Placebo and Pembrolizumab (PBO + PBZ)38.8

[back to top]

Apparent Total Plasma Clearance (CL/F) of CC-486

Apparent total plasma clearance (CL/F) of CC-486 was calculated as Dose/AUC∞ (NCT02546986)
Timeframe: PK blood samples collected at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6 and 8 hours after CC-486 administration on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1

InterventionLiters/hour (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 2 Day 1
CC-486 and Pembrolizumab (CC-486 + PBZ)1922.71410.4

[back to top]

Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd/F) of CC-486

Apparent volume of distribution, was calculated according to the equation: Vd/F = (CL/F)/λz (NCT02546986)
Timeframe: PK blood samples collected at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6 and 8 hours after CC-486 administration on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1

InterventionLiters (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 2 Day 1
CC-486 and Pembrolizumab (CC-486 + PBZ)1836.21777.1

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC∞) of CC-486

Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from Time 0 extrapolated to infinity, calculated as [AUCt + Ct/ λz]. Ct is the last quantifiable concentration. No AUC extrapolation was performed with unreliable λz. If AUC % extrap is ≥25%, AUCi inf was not reported. (NCT02546986)
Timeframe: Pharmacokinetic (PK) blood samples collected at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6 and 8 hours after CC-486 administration on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1

Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 2 Day 1
CC-486 and Pembrolizumab (CC-486 + PBZ)156.0212.7

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of CC-486

Maximum observed plasma concentration, obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time data. (NCT02546986)
Timeframe: PK blood samples collected at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6 and 8 hours after CC-486 administration on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 2 Day 1
CC-486 and Pembrolizumab (CC-486 + PBZ)94.7110.0

[back to top]

Hematologic Improvement Rate

The number of participants with hematologic improvement neutrophil response (HI-N) + hematologic improvement platelet response (HI-P) + hematologic improvement erythroid response (HI-E) according to the International Working Group for Myelodysplastic Syndromes for Hematologic Improvement (IWG MDS HI) criteria. HI-E is defined as a hemoglobin increase by ≥ 1.5 g/dL and a relevant reduction in units of RBC transfusions by an absolute number of at least 4 RBC transfusions/8 week compared with the pretreatment transfusion number in the previous 8 week. HI-P is defined as an absolute increase of ≥ 30 X 10^9/L for participants starting with > 20 X and an increase from < 20 X 10^9/L to > 20 X 10^9/L and by at least 100%. HI-N is defined as At least 100% increase and an absolute increase > 0.5 X 10^9/L. (NCT02577406)
Timeframe: From randomization up to approximately 49 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AG-22133
Conventional Care Regimens (CCRs)9

[back to top]

Event-Free Survival

Time from randomization to documented morphologic relapse after complete remission/complete remission with incomplete neutrophil recovery/complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery (CR/CRi/CRp), progressive disease (PD) or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Morphologic Relapse after CR/CRi/CRp is defined as either reappearance of ≥ 5% blasts in the BM not attributable to any other cause or the development of extramedullary disease. PD is defined as a > 50% increase of BM blast count percentage from baseline to ≥ 20% for participants with 5 to 70% BM blasts at baseline or a doubling of absolute blast count in peripheral blood from baseline to ≥ 10 x 109/L (10,000/μL) for participants with > 70% BM blasts at baseline or the development of new extramedullary disease. (NCT02577406)
Timeframe: From randomization to the date of documented morphologic relapse after CR/CRi/CRp, PD or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. (up to approximately 49 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
AG-2213.2
Conventional Care Regimens (CCRs)2.5

[back to top]

The Percent of Participants Experiencing Clinically Significant Vital Sign Abnormalities

The percent of participants with clinically significant vital sign abnormalities including weight, temperature, blood pressure, pulse rate, and respiratory rate. (NCT02577406)
Timeframe: From first dose up to approximately 49 months

InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
AG-2210
Conventional Care Regimens (CCRs)0

[back to top]

The Percentage of Participants Experiencing Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities

The percent of participants with clinically significant ECG abnormalities. 12-lead ECG was assessed by a physician trained in ECG interpretation. Intervals including PR, QRS, QT and RR were collected, as well as heart rate and rhythm. (NCT02577406)
Timeframe: From first dose up to approximately 49 months

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
AG-2217.6
Conventional Care Regimens (CCRs)2.1

[back to top]

Time to Response

Time from randomization to first documented MLFS/CR/CRi/CRp/PR. Complete remission (CR) and morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS) are defined as <5% blasts in a BM aspirate sample with marrow spicules and a count of ≥200 nucleated cells. There should be no blasts with Auer rods and no extramedullary disease. CR must also include the following conditions: absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1,000/μL, Platelet count ≥100,000/μL, and independent of red cell transfusions for ≥1 week before each response assessment. Complete remission with incomplete neutrophil recovery (CRi) is all criteria of CR except ANC. Complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) is all criteria of CR except platelet count. partial remission (PR) is defined as all hematologic criteria of CR with a >50% decrease in the percentage of BM blasts to 5% to 25%. (<5% considered if Auer rods are present). (NCT02577406)
Timeframe: From randomization to to first documented MLFS/CR/CRi/CRp/PR (up to approximately 49 months)

InterventionDays (Median)
AG-22158.0
Conventional Care Regimens (CCRs)56.0

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Time from first documented MLFS/CR/CRi/CRp/PR to documented morphologic relapse after CR/CRi/CRp/ PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. CR and MLFS are defined as <5% blasts in a BM aspirate sample with marrow spicules + a count of ≥200 nucleated cells with no blasts with Auer rods + no extramedullary disease. CR must also include: ANC ≥ 1,000/μL, Platelet count ≥100,000/μL, + independent of red cell transfusions for ≥1 week before assessment. CRi is all criteria of CR except ANC. CRp is all criteria of CR except platelet count. PR is defined as all hematologic criteria of CR with >50% decrease in BM blasts to 5%-25%. Relapse after CR/CRi/CRp is defined as reappearance of ≥ 5% blasts in the BM not attributable to other cause or development of extramedullary disease. PD is defined as > 50% increase of BM blast count from baseline to ≥ 20% or a doubling of absolute blast count in peripheral blood from baseline to ≥ 10,000/μL or development of new extramedullary disease. (NCT02577406)
Timeframe: From randomization to documented morphologic relapse after CR/CRi/CRp/ PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 49 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
AG-2213.9
Conventional Care Regimens (CCRs)4.5

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure

Time from randomization to discontinuation of study treatment due to any cause (NCT02577406)
Timeframe: From randomization to discontinuation of study treatment due to any cause (up to approximately 49 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
AG-2214.9
Conventional Care Regimens (CCRs)1.9

[back to top]

The Percent of Participants Experiencing Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities - Serum Chemistry

The percent of participants with clinically significant serum chemistry laboratory abnormalities. A clinically significant laboratory abnormality is defined as meeting Grade 3 or Grade 4 criteria according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Grade 3 is defined as severe or medically significant but not immediately life threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care. Grade 4 is defined as life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. The chemistry panel includes sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, chloride, phosphorus, CO2, bicarbonate, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, glucose, albumin, total protein, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), bilirubin (total and direct), uric acid, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), AST/SGOT, ALT/SGPT, gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), amylase and lipase. (NCT02577406)
Timeframe: From first dose up to approximately 49 months

InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
AG-22142.7
Conventional Care Regimens (CCRs)21.3

[back to top]

Treatment Mortality at 30 Days

The number of participant deaths from any cause within 30 days of initiation of study treatment. (NCT02577406)
Timeframe: From first dose to 30 days after first dose

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AG-22110
Conventional Care Regimens (CCRs)13

[back to top]

Treatment Mortality at 60 Days

The number of participant deaths from any cause within 60 days of initiation of study treatment. (NCT02577406)
Timeframe: From first dose to 60 days after first dose

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AG-22127
Conventional Care Regimens (CCRs)30

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)

The change from baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is composed of 30 items that address general physical symptoms, physical functioning, fatigue and malaise, and social and emotional functioning. Subscale scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores on functional scales indicating better function and higher scores on symptom scales indicating worse symptoms. A change of at least 10 points on the standardized domain scores was required for it to be considered meaningful. Results obtained just prior to the start of study treatment on Day 1 of Cycle 1 will serve as the baseline values. If not available, the most recent screening results prior to the start of study treatment on Day 1 of Cycle 1 will be considered the baseline values. (NCT02577406)
Timeframe: From baseline to cycle 2 day 1 (up to approximately 1 month)

,
InterventionChange from baseline in QLQ-C30 score (Mean)
Global QoLPhysical FunctioningRole FunctioningCognitive FunctioningEmotional FunctioningSocial FunctioningFatigueNausea / VomitingPainDyspneaInsomniaAppetite LossConstipationDiarrheaFinancial Difficulties
AG-221-4.7-3.1-3.8-0.60.9-0.65.59.06.0-1.38.510.72.84.1-0.3
Conventional Care Regimens (CCRs)-4.0-6.7-7.8-5.1-0.7-10.27.51.97.00.01.18.61.61.6-3.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Health Utility Index

The EQ-5D is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. Responses from the 5 dimensions are coded so that a '1' indicates no problem on that dimension, and '5' indicates the most serious problem. Results obtained just prior to the start of study treatment on Day 1 of Cycle 1 will serve as the baseline values. If not available, the most recent screening results prior to the start of study treatment on Day 1 of Cycle 1 will be considered the baseline values. The responses for the 5 dimensions can be combined in a 5-digit number describing the respondent's health state. Score was converted to a single index value using the cross-walk method to the EQ-5D-3L value set. (NCT02577406)
Timeframe: From baseline up to cycle 2 day 1 (up to approximately 1 month)

InterventionChange from baseline in EQ-5D score (Mean)
AG-221-0.0738
Conventional Care Regimens (CCRs)-0.0598

[back to top]

The Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs)

The number of participants experiencing different types of adverse events (AE). An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of a study. A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any AE occurring at any dose that: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or constitutes an important medical event. All AEs were coded using the MedDRA Version 22.0. Adverse events were analyzed in terms of treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs). A treatment-related TEAE was defined as a TEAE that was suspected by the investigator to be related to study treatment. The severity was graded by the study personnel based on NCI National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03. (NCT02577406)
Timeframe: From first dose up to 28 days after last dose (up to approximately 49 months)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)TEAE Related to Study DrugGrade ≥ 3 TEAEGrade ≥ 3 TEAE Related to Study DrugSerious TEAESerious TEAE Related to Study DrugTEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study DrugTreatment-related TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study DrugTEAE Leading to Study Drug Dose Reduction OnlyTreatment-related TEAE Leading to Study Drug Dose Reduction OnlyTEAE Leading to Study Drug Dose Interruption OnlyTreatment-related TEAE Leading to Study Drug Dose Interruption OnlyTEAE Leading to Study Drug Dose Reduction or Dose InterruptionTreatment-related TEAE Leading to Study Drug Dose Reduction or Dose InterruptionTEAE Leading to DeathTreatment-related TEAE Leading to Death
AG-2211571211467413834355221884469256771
Conventional Care Regimens (CCRs)131861124992301663335203621335

[back to top]

The Percent of Participants Experiencing Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities - Hematology

The percent of participants with clinically significant hematology laboratory abnormalities. A clinically significant laboratory abnormality is defined as meeting Grade 3 or Grade 4 criteria according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Grade 3 is defined as severe or medically significant but not immediately life threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care. Grade 4 is defined as life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. The hematology panel includes complete blood count (CBC) with differential, including red blood cell (RBC) count, hemoglobin, hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), white blood cell (WBC) count (with differential), absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and platelet count. (NCT02577406)
Timeframe: From first dose up to approximately 49 months

InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
AG-22194.3
Conventional Care Regimens (CCRs)89.4

[back to top]

The Number of Participants That Underwent Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)

The number of participants that underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation during the study. (NCT02577406)
Timeframe: From randomization up to approximately 49 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AG-2217
Conventional Care Regimens (CCRs)2

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

The time between randomization and death from any cause. Participants who drop-out or are alive at the end of trial will have their OS times censored at the time of last contact, as appropriate. (NCT02577406)
Timeframe: From randomization to death due to any cause (up to approximately 49 months)

InterventionMonths (Mean)
AG-2216.5
Conventional Care Regimens (CCRs)6.2

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

Number of participants with MLFS + CR + CRi + CRp + PR according to modified International Working Group Acute Myeloid Leukemia (IWG AML) response criteria. Complete response (CR) and morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS) are defined as <5% blasts in a BM aspirate sample with marrow spicules and a count of ≥200 nucleated cells. There should be no blasts with Auer rods and no extramedullary disease. CR must also include: absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1,000/μL, Platelet count ≥100,000/μL, and independent of red cell transfusions for ≥1 week before each response assessment. Complete remission with incomplete neutrophil recovery (CRi) is all criteria of CR except ANC. Complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) is all criteria of CR except platelet count. Partial remission (PR) is defined as all hematologic criteria of CR with a >50% decrease in the percentage of BM blasts to 5% to 25%. (<5% considered if Auer rods are present). (NCT02577406)
Timeframe: From randomization up to approximately 49 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AG-22125
Conventional Care Regimens (CCRs)7

[back to top]

Overall Remission Rate

The number of participants with CR + CRi + CRp according to modified International Working Group Acute Myeloid Leukemia (IWG AML) response criteria. Complete remission (CR) is defined as <5% blasts in a BM aspirate sample with marrow spicules and a count of ≥200 nucleated cells. There should be no blasts with Auer rods and no extramedullary disease. CR must also include the following conditions: absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1,000/μL, Platelet count ≥100,000/μL, and independent of red cell transfusions for ≥1 week before each response assessment. Complete remission with incomplete neutrophil recovery (CRi) is all criteria of CR except ANC. Complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) is all criteria of CR except platelet count. (NCT02577406)
Timeframe: From randomization up to approximately 49 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AG-22117
Conventional Care Regimens (CCRs)7

[back to top]

One-Year Survival Rate

The proportion of participants alive at 1 year after randomization (NCT02577406)
Timeframe: From randomization to 1 year after randomization

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
AG-2210.375
Conventional Care Regimens (CCRs)0.261

[back to top]

Complete Remission Rate

The number of participants with morphologic complete remission (CR) according to modified International Working Group Acute Myeloid Leukemia Response Criteria (IWG AML). CR is defined as less than 5% blasts in a BM aspirate sample with marrow spicules and with a count of at least 200 nucleated cells. There should be no blasts with Auer rods and absence of extramedullary disease; plus the following conditions: absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1,000/μL, Platelet count ≥100,000/μL, and independent of red cell transfusions for ≥1 week before each response assessment. (NCT02577406)
Timeframe: From randomization up to approximately 49 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AG-22111
Conventional Care Regimens (CCRs)1

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Tmax of Combination Treatment Group A INCB053914 50 mg + Cytarabine

(NCT02587598)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 5

Interventionh (Median)
Parts 3 & 4: INCB053914 50 mg BID + Cytarabine1.52

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Tmax of Combination Treatment Group C INCB053914 80 mg + Ruxolitinib

(NCT02587598)
Timeframe: Regimen 2 Week 4

Interventionh (Median)
Parts 3 & 4: INB053914 80 mg BID + Ruxolitinib2.02

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Tmax of INCB053914 Monotherapy

(NCT02587598)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 8

Interventionhour (Median)
Parts 1 and 2: INCB053914 100 mg QD2.0
Parts 1 and 2: INCB053914 50 mg BID1.0
Parts 1 and 2: INB053914 65 mg BID2.0
Parts 1 and 2: INB053914 80 mg BID1.5
Parts 1 and 2: INB053914 100 mg BID1.0
Parts 1 and 2: INB053914 115 mg BIDNA

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Cl/F of Combination Treatment Group A INCB053914 50 mg + Cytarabine

(NCT02587598)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 5

InterventionL/hr (Mean)
Parts 3 & 4: INCB053914 50 mg BID + Cytarabine122

[back to top]

Determination of the Safety and Tolerability of INCB053914 as Measured by the Number of Participants With Adverse Events

(NCT02587598)
Timeframe: Approximately 7 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Parts 1 and 2: INCB053914 100 mg QD4
Parts 1 and 2: INCB053914 50 mg BID11
Parts 1 and 2: INB053914 65 mg BID4
Parts 1 and 2: INB053914 80 mg BID21
Parts 1 and 2: INB053914 100 mg BID12
Parts 1 and 2: INB053914 115 mg BID6
Parts 3 and 4: INCB053914 50 mg BID + Cytarabine6
Parts 3 and 4: INCB053914 50 mg BID + Azacitidine7
Parts 3 and 4: INCB053914 80 mg BID + Azacitine9
Parts 3 & 4: INCB 053914 50 mg BID + Ruxolitinib3
Parts 3 & 4: INCB 053914 80 mg + Ruxolitinib14

[back to top]

Evaluation of Phosphorylated BCL--2 Associated Death Promoter Protein (pBAD)

Percent Inhibition of pBAD at the C1D15 trough from the pBAD at pre-dose by ex vivo cellular assay (NCT02587598)
Timeframe: 1 month

InterventionPercentage of Inhibition (Mean)
Parts 1 and 2: INCB053914 100 mg QD41
Parts 1 and 2: INCB053914 50 mg BID37
Parts 1 and 2: INB053914 65 mg BID68
Parts 1 and 2: INB053914 80 mg BID78
Parts 1 and 2: INB053914 100 mg BID55
Parts 1 and 2: INB053914 115 mg BID58

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: AUCtau of Combination Group B INCB053914 80 mg + Azatcitidine

(NCT02587598)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 8

InterventionnM*h (Mean)
Parts 3 & 4: INCB053914 80 mg BID + Azacitidine11000

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: AUCtau of Combination Treatment Group A INCB053914 50 mg + Cytarabine

(NCT02587598)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 5

InterventionnM*h (Mean)
Parts 3 & 4: INCB053914 50 mg BID + Cytarabine2860

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: AUCtau of Combination Treatment Group C INCB053914 80 mg + Ruxolitinib

(NCT02587598)
Timeframe: Regimen 2 Week 4

InterventionnM*h (Mean)
Parts 3 & 4: INB053914 80 mg BID + Ruxolitinib3060

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: AUCtau of INCB053914 Monotherapy

(NCT02587598)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 8

InterventionnM*h (Mean)
Parts 1 and 2: INCB053914 100 mg QD4140
Parts 1 and 2: INCB053914 50 mg BID1290
Parts 1 and 2: INB053914 65 mg BID2480
Parts 1 and 2: INB053914 80 mg BID3940
Parts 1 and 2: INB053914 100 mg BID5410
Parts 1 and 2: INB053914 115 mg BID5630

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Cl/F of Combination Group B INCB053914 80 mg + Azatcitidine

(NCT02587598)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 8

InterventionL/h (Mean)
Parts 3 & 4: INCB053914 80 mg BID + Azacitidine30.8

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Cl/F of Combination Treatment Group C INCB053914 80 mg + Ruxolitinib

(NCT02587598)
Timeframe: Regimen 2 Week 4

InterventionL/h (Mean)
Parts 3 & 4: INB053914 80 mg BID + Ruxolitinib69.7

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: CL/F of INCB053914 Monotherapy

(NCT02587598)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 8

InterventionL/h (Mean)
Parts 1 and 2: INCB053914 100 mg QD47.2
Parts 1 and 2: INCB053914 50 mg BID132
Parts 1 and 2: INB053914 65 mg BID95.1
Parts 1 and 2: INB053914 80 mg BID71.2
Parts 1 and 2: INB053914 100 mg BID85.2
Parts 1 and 2: INB053914 115 mg BID39.8

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Cmax of Combination Group B INCB053914 80 mg + Azatcitidine

(NCT02587598)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 8

InterventionnM (Mean)
Parts 3 & 4: INCB053914 80 mg BID + Azacitidine1320

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Cmax of Combination Treatment Group A INCB053914 50 mg + Cytarabine

(NCT02587598)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 5

InterventionnM (Mean)
Parts 3 & 4: INCB053914 50 mg BID + Cytarabine423

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Cmax of Combination Treatment Group C INCB053914 80 mg + Ruxolitinib

(NCT02587598)
Timeframe: Regimen 2 Week 4

InterventionnM (Mean)
Parts 3 & 4: INB053914 80 mg BID + Ruxolitinib541

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Cmax of INCB053914 Monotherapy

(NCT02587598)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 8

InterventionnM (Mean)
Parts 1 and 2: INCB053914 100 mg QD352
Parts 1 and 2: INCB053914 50 mg BID227
Parts 1 and 2: INB053914 65 mg BID333
Parts 1 and 2: INB053914 80 mg BID591
Parts 1 and 2: INB053914 100 mg BID796
Parts 1 and 2: INB053914 115 mg BID578

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Cmin of Combination Group B INCB053914 80 mg + Azatcitidine

(NCT02587598)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 8

InterventionnM (Mean)
Parts 3 & 4: INCB053914 80 mg BID + Azacitidine513

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Cmin of Combination Treatment Group A INCB053914 50 mg + Cytarabine

(NCT02587598)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 5

InterventionnM (Mean)
Parts 3 & 4: INCB053914 50 mg BID + Cytarabine139

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Cmin of Combination Treatment Group C INCB053914 80 mg + Ruxolitinib

(NCT02587598)
Timeframe: Regimen 2 Week 4

InterventionnM (Mean)
Parts 3 & 4: INB053914 80 mg BID + Ruxolitinib104

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Ctau of INCB053914 Monotherapy

(NCT02587598)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 8

InterventionL/h (Mean)
Parts 1 and 2: INCB053914 100 mg QD98.2
Parts 1 and 2: INCB053914 50 mg BID65.7
Parts 1 and 2: INB053914 65 mg BID132
Parts 1 and 2: INB053914 80 mg BID213
Parts 1 and 2: INB053914 100 mg BID293
Parts 1 and 2: INB053914 115 mg BID410

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Tmax of Combination Group B INCB053914 80 mg + Azatcitidine

(NCT02587598)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 8

Interventionh (Median)
Parts 3 & 4: INCB053914 80 mg BID + Azacitidine2

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

Overall response rate (ORR) defined as complete response plus partial response (CR + PR) and hematological improvement (HI). MDS International Working Group criteria used to assess response. (NCT02599649)
Timeframe: 116 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Low or Intermediate-1 MDS Group - Lirilumab1
High Risk MDS Group - Azacitidine + Lirilumab6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With CR and PR by Cycle 4

Disease responses for HR MDS/CMML per modified IWG response criteria for MDS and for low-blast AML on revised IWG response criteria for AML.CR for HR MDS/CMML: <=5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines in bone marrow, >=11 g/dL Hb; >=100*10^9/L plt; >=1.0*10^9/L ANC and 0% blasts in peripheral blood.PR for HR MDS/CMML: considered achieved if all CR criteria is met except for bone marrow blasts decreased by>=50% over pretreatment but still>5%.CR for low-blast AML: morphologic leukemia-free state, ANC of>1.0*10^9/L and plt of>=100*10^9/L, transfusion independence, no residual evidence of extramedullary leukemia. CR with incomplete blood count recovery for low-blast AML: fulfill all criteria for CR except for residual neutropenia (<100*10^9/L)/TTP (<100*10^9/L). PR for low-blast AML: all hematological values for CR but with decrease of >=50% in percentage of blasts to 5%-25% in bone marrow aspirate. The percentages are rounded off to report the nearest whole numbers. (NCT02610777)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until CR and PR, by Cycle 4 (cycle length=28 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^221.1
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 + Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^231.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Response by Cycle 4

Disease responses (HR MDS/CMML): modified IWG criteria for MDS; low-blast (LB) AML: revised IWG criteria for AML. Overall response(HR MDS/CMML)=CR,PR/HI,LB AML=CR+ CR with incomplete blood count recovery(Cri)+PR.HR MDS/CMML-CR:<=5%myeloblasts with normal maturation of bone marrow (BM) cell lines,>=11g/dL Hb,>=100*10^9/L plt,>=1.0*10^9/L ANC,0% blasts in peripheral blood; PR:CR criteria met except BM blasts>=50%less over pretreatment but still>5%; HI:hb increase (inc)>=1.5g/dL if baseline<11g/dL;plt inc>=30*10^9/L if baseline>20*10^9/L/Inc. from <20*10^9/L->20*10^9/L, ANC inc. by 100%;absolute inc. of>0.5*10^9/L if baseline<100*10^9/L. LB AML-CR:morphologic leukemia-freestate>1.0*10^9ANC,>=100*10^9/L plt, transfusion independence, no residual evidence of extramedullary leukemia;CRi:fulfill CR criteria except residual neutropenia<1.0*10^9/L/TTP<100*10^9/L;PR:all CR hematological values but>=50%less in BM aspirate. The percentages are rounded off to report the nearest whole numbers. (NCT02610777)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until CR, PR or HI, by Cycle 4 (cycle length=28 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^244.7
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 + Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^257.9

[back to top]

Six-month Survival Rate

Kaplan-Meier estimate of probability of OS at the end of the month 6 from randomization. (NCT02610777)
Timeframe: Month 6

Interventionsurvival probability (Number)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^20.806
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 + Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^20.914

[back to top]

Time to AML Transformation in HR MDS or CMML Participants

Time to AML transformation in HR MDS and CMML participants is defined as time from randomization to documented AML transformation. Participants without documented AML transformation at the time of the analysis are censored at the date of the last assessment. Participants who died before progression to AML are censored at the date of death. Transformation to AML is defined, according to World Health Organization (WHO) classification, as a participant having >20% blasts in the blood or marrow and increase of blast count by 50%. (NCT02610777)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until transformation to AML (up to approximately 5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2NA
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 + Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2NA

[back to top]

Time to First CR or PR

Time to first CR or PR: time from randomization to first documented CR or PR, whichever occurs first. Disease responses (HR MDS/CMML) based on modified IWG response criteria for MDS; low-blast AML on revised IWG response criteria for AML. HR MDS/CMML-CR: <=5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all bone marrow cell lines, >=11 g/dL Hb, >=100*10^9/L plt,>=1.0*10^9/L ANC, 0% blasts in peripheral blood; PR: all CR criteria met except bone marrow blasts >=50% decrease over pretreatment but still >5%; For low-blast AML-CR: morphologic leukemia-free state, >1.0*10^9/L ANC, plt >=100*10^9/L, transfusion independence, no residual evidence of extramedullary leukemia; CR with incomplete blood count recovery: fulfill CR criteria except residual neutropenia <1.0*10^9/L/TTP <100*10^9/L; PR: all CR hematological values but with a decrease of >=50% in the percentage of blasts to 5% to 25% in the bone marrow aspirate. (NCT02610777)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until CR or PR (up to approximately 5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^213.2
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 + Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^28.3

[back to top]

Time to Progressive Disease (PD), Relapse, or Death

Time from randomization until PD/transformation to AML/relapse/death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Relapse after CR or PR in MDS/CMML: return to pretreatment bone marrow blast % or decrement of >=50% from maximum remission levels in ANC or plt, reduction in Hb concentration by >=1.5 g/dL or transfusion dependence. PD: at least 50% decrement from maximum remission in ANC or plt, or reduction in Hb by>=2g/dL or transfusion dependence;participants with <5% blasts: >=50% increase (inc) in blasts to >5%; 5%-10%: >=50% inc to >10%; 10%-20%: >=50% inc to>20%;20%-30%:>=50% inc to >30%. Relapse after CR in Low blast AML: reappearance of leukemic blasts in peripheral blood or >=5% blasts in bone marrow not attributable to any cause (example, bone marrow regeneration after consolidation therapy). If there are no circulating blasts, bone marrow contains 5%-20% blasts, a repeat analysis is performed a week later. (NCT02610777)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until PD, relapse or death (up to approximately 5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^213.6
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 + Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^215.2

[back to top]

Time to Subsequent Therapy

Time to subsequent therapy is defined as time from randomization to the date of the first subsequent therapy. Subsequent therapy is defined as agent(s) with antileukemic/anti-MDS activity. Participants who discontinue study treatment to receive single-agent azacitidine off study did not be counted as receiving subsequent therapy. (NCT02610777)
Timeframe: From date of randomization up to approximately 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2NA
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 + Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2NA

[back to top]

Number of Participants in the Safety Analysis Population With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values Reported as TEAEs

ECG assessments included QT, QRS duration, PR interval, ventricular rate, QTcB, QTcF. (NCT02610777)
Timeframe: From date of first dose up to 30 days after administration of the last dose of any study drug (up to approximately 5 years)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Atrial fibrillationTachycardia
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^241
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 + Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^244

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With CR and Partial Remission (PR)

Disease responses for HR MDS/CMML per modified IWG response criteria for MDS and for low-blast AML on revised IWG response criteria for AML.CR for HR MDS/CMML: <=5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines in bone marrow ,>=11 g/dL Hb;>=100*10^9/L plt; >=1.0*10^9/L ANC and 0% blasts in peripheral blood. PR for HR MDS/CMML:considered achieved if all CR criteria is met except for bone marrow blasts decreased by >=50%over pretreatment but still >5%. CR for low-blast AML: morphologic leukemia-free state, ANC of >1.0*10^9/L and plt of >=100*10^9/L, transfusion independence, no residual evidence of extramedullary leukemia. CR with incomplete blood count recovery for low-blast AML:fulfill all criteria for CR except for residual neutropenia (<100*10^9/L)/TTP(<100*10^9/L). PR for low-blast AML:all hematological values for CR but with decrease of >=50% in percentage of blasts to 5%-25% in bone marrow aspirate. The percentages are rounded off to report the nearest whole numbers. (NCT02610777)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until CR and PR (up to approximately 5 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^245
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 + Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^251

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR)

Disease responses for HR MDS or CMML is based on the modified International Working Group (IWG) response criteria for MDS and for low-blast AML on the revised IWG response criteria for AML. CR for HR MDS or CMML: <= 5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines in the bone marrow, and >= 11 gram/deciliter (g/dL) hemoglobin (Hb), >=100*10^9/liter (/L) platelets (plt), >=1.0*10^9/L absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and 0% blasts in peripheral blood. CR for low-blast AML: morphologic leukemia-free state, ANC of more than 1.0*10^9/L and plt of >=1.0*10^9/L, transfusion independence, and no residual evidence of extramedullary leukemia. CR with incomplete blood count recovery for low-blast AML: some participants fulfill all of the criteria for CR except for residual neutropenia (<1.0*10^9/L) or thrombocytopenia (TTP) (<100*10^9/L). The percentages are rounded off to report the nearest whole numbers. (NCT02610777)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until CR (up to approximately 5 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^236
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 + Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^245

[back to top] [back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the analysis were censored at the date the participant was last known to be alive. The Kaplan Meier estimates was used for the analysis. (NCT02610777)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until death (up to 3 years and 5 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^219.0
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 + Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^221.8

[back to top]

One-year Survival Rate

Kaplan-Meier estimate of probability of OS at the end of the first year from randomization. (NCT02610777)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionsurvival probability (Number)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^20.677
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 + Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^20.845

[back to top]

Duration of Complete Remission (CR) in Low-blast AML

Disease responses for low-blast AML is based on revised IWG response criteria for AML. CR for low-blast AML: morphologic leukemia-free state, ANC of more than 1.0*10^9/L and plt of >=100*10^9/L, transfusion independence, no residual evidence of extramedullary leukemia. CR with incomplete blood count recovery for low-blast AML: some participants fulfill all criteria for CR except for residual neutropenia (<1.0*10^9/L)/TTP (<100*10^9/L). (NCT02610777)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until CR (up to approximately 5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^210.2
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 + Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^212.6

[back to top]

Duration of Complete Remission (CR) and Partial Remission (PR)

Duration of CR is first documented CR to the first documentation of PD or relapse from CR (participants with low-blast AML). Disease responses (HR MDS/CMML) are based on modified IWG response criteria for MDS and for low-blast AML on revised IWG response criteria for AML. For HR MDS/CMML-CR:<=5%myeloblasts with normal maturation of all bone marrow cell lines, >=11 g/dL Hb, >=100*10^9/L plt,>=1.0*10^9/L neutrophils, 0% blasts in peripheral blood;PR: all CR criteria met except bone marrow blasts >=50% decrease over pretreatment but still >5%; low-blast AML-CR: morphologic leukemia-free state, >1.0*10^9/L ANC ,plt >=100*10^9/L,transfusion independence, no residual evidence of extramedullary leukemia;CR with incomplete blood count recovery:fulfill CR criteria except residual neutropenia <1.0*10^9/L/TTP <100*10^9/L;PR:all CR hematological values but with a decrease of >=50% in blasts percentage to 5%-25% in bone marrow aspirate. (NCT02610777)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until CR or PR (up to approximately 5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^212.9
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 + Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^218.6

[back to top]

Duration of Complete Remission (CR)

Duration of CR is first documented CR to the first documentation of PD or relapse from CR (participants with low-blast AML) or relapse after CR or PR (participants with HR MDS/CMML). Disease responses for HR MDS or CMML are based on the Modified IWG Response Criteria for MDS and for low-blast AML on the Revised IWG Response Criteria for AML.CR for HR MDS or CMML≤5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines in the bone marrow,≥11 g/dL Hgb,≥100*10^9/L pl,≥1.0*10^9/L neutrophils;0% blasts in peripheral blood.CR for low-blast AML:morphologic leukemia-free state,neutrophils of<1.0*10^9/L;pl of≥100*10^9/L,transfusion independence,no residual evidence of extramedullary leukemia.CRi for low-blast AML: participants fulfill all of the criteria for CR except for residual neutropenia (<1.0*10^9/L) or thrombocytopenia (pl<100*10^9/L). (NCT02610777)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until CR (up to approximately 5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^212.9
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 + Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^218.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants in the Safety Analysis Population With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as TEAEs

Laboratory assessments included clinical chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis. (NCT02610777)
Timeframe: From date of first dose up to 30 days after administration of the last dose of any study drug (up to approximately 5 years)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
NeutropeniaAnaemiaNeutrophil count decreasedThrombocytopenia
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^22129615
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 + Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^221191216

[back to top]

Number of Participants in the Safety Analysis Population With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline Values in Vital Signs Reported as TEAEs

Vital signs assessments included diastolic and systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and body temperature. (NCT02610777)
Timeframe: From date of first dose up to 30 days after administration of the last dose of any study drug (up to approximately 5 years)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PyrexiaHypotension
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2253
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 + Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2226

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that: 1) results in death, 2) is life-threatening, 3) requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, 4) results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, 5) leads to a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of the participant or 6) is an medically important event that satisfies any of the following: a) May require intervention to prevent items 1 through 5 above. b) May expose the participant to danger, even though the event is not immediately life threatening or fatal or does not result in hospitalization. A TEAE was defined as any adverse event occurring after the start of pevonedistat administration of the treatment period. (NCT02610777)
Timeframe: From date of first dose up to 30 days after administration of the last dose of any study drug (up to approximately 5 years)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TEAEsSAEs
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^26240
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 + Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^25740

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline Values in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status

Number of participants with change from Baseline in ECOG performance status was measured on 6 point scale to assess participant's performance status, where: Grade 0(Normal activity. Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction); Grade 1(Symptoms but ambulatory. Restricted in physically strenuous activity, but ambulatory and able to carry out light or sedentary work); Grade 2(In bed <50% of the time. Ambulatory and capable of all self-care, but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours); Grade 3(In bed >50% of the time. Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50 percent of waking hours); Grade 4(100% bedridden. Completely disabled, cannot carry on any self-care, totally confined to bed or chair); Grade 5(Dead). (NCT02610777)
Timeframe: From date of first dose up to 30 days after administration of the last dose of any study drug (up to approximately 5 years)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline: 0; Overall: 0Baseline: 0; Overall: 1Baseline: 0; Overall: 2Baseline: 0; Overall: 3Baseline: 0; Overall: 4Baseline: 1; Overall: 1Baseline: 1; Overall: 2Baseline: 1; Overall: 3Baseline: 2; Overall: 2
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2131530217552
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 + Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^291332018823

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Red Blood Cells (RBCs) and Platelet-transfusion Independence

A participant was defined as RBC or platelet-transfusion independent if he/she received no RBC or platelet transfusions for a period of at least 8 weeks before the first dose of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of any study drug. Rate of transfusion independence was defined as number of participants who became transfusion independent divided by the number of participants who were transfusion dependent at Baseline. (NCT02610777)
Timeframe: 8 weeks before randomization through 30 days after last dose of any study drug (up to approximately 5 years and 3 months)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
RBCs-transfusion IndependencePlatelet-transfusion Independence
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^250.060.0
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 + Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^269.280.0

[back to top]

Event-Free Survival (EFS)

EFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the occurrence of an event. An event is defined as death or transformation to AML for HR MDS/CMML participants, whichever occurs first, or defined as death for low-blast AML participants. HR MDS/CMML participants without documented EFS event will be censored at the date of the last response assessment. HR MDS/CMML participants with no response assessment and no death will be censored at the date of randomization. Low-blast AML participants without documentation of death will be censored at the date the participant was last known to be alive. HR MDS/CMML participants who received alternative antineoplastic therapy before death or transformation to AML will be censored at the date of last adequate assessment prior to starting alternate antineoplastic therapy. The Kaplan-Meier estimate was used for the analysis. (NCT02610777)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until transformation to AML, or death due to any cause (up to approximately 5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^217.6
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 + Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^221.0

[back to top]

Duration of Overall Response

Duration of OR: response to first documentation of PD or relapse from CR for low-blast AML or relapse after CR or PR for HR MDS/CMML. Disease responses(HR MDS/CMML): modified IWG criteria for MDS;low-blast AML: revised IWG criteria for AML.Overall response(HR MDS/CMML)=CR,PR/HI,LB AML=CR+ Cri+PR.HR MDS/CMML-CR:≤5%myeloblasts with normal maturation of BM cell lines,≥11g/dL Hb,≥100*10^9/L plt,≥1.0*10^9/L ANC,0%blasts in peripheral blood; PR:CR criteria met except BM blasts≥50%less over pretreatment but still>5%; HI:hb increase(inc)≥1.5g/dL if baseline<11g/dL; plt inc≥30*10^9/L if baseline >20*10^9/L inc from<20*10^9/L->20*10^9/L,ANC inc by100%; absolute inc of >0.5*10^9/L if baseline <100*10^9/L.LB AML-CR: morphologic leukemia-freestate >1.0*10^9 ANC,≥100*1 ^9/Lplt, transfusion independence, no residual evidence of extramedullary leukemia; CRi:fulfill CR criteria except residual neutropenia<1.0*10^9/L/TTP<100*10^9/L; PR:all CR hematological values but>=50%less in BM aspirate. (NCT02610777)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until CR, PR or HI (up to approximately 5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^214.0
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 + Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^220.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Response

Disease responses (HR MDS/CMML): modified IWG criteria for MDS; low-blast (LB) AML: revised IWG criteria for AML. Overall response(HR MDS/CMML)=CR,PR/HI,LB AML=CR+ CR with incomplete blood count recovery(Cri)+PR.HR MDS/CMML-CR:<=5%myeloblasts with normal maturation of bone marrow (BM) cell lines,>=11g/dL Hb,>=100*10^9/L plt,>=1.0*10^9/L ANC,0% blasts in peripheral blood; PR:CR criteria met except BM blasts>=50%less over pretreatment but still>5%; HI:hb increase (inc)>=1.5g/dL if baseline<11g/dL;plt inc>=30*10^9/L if baseline>20*10^9/L/Inc. from <20*10^9/L->20*10^9/L, ANC inc. by 100%;absolute inc. of>0.5*10^9/L if baseline<100*10^9/L. LB AML-CR:morphologic leukemia-freestate>1.0*10^9ANC,>=100*10^9/L plt, transfusion independence, no residual evidence of extramedullary leukemia;CRi:fulfill CR criteria except residual neutropenia<1.0*10^9/L/TTP<100*10^9/L;PR:all CR hematological values but>=50%less in BM aspirate. The percentages are rounded off to report the nearest whole numbers. (NCT02610777)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until CR, PR, or hematologic improvement (HI) (up to approximately 5 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^262
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 + Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^271

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With CR in Low-blast AML by Cycle 4

Disease response for low-blast AML is based on revised IWG response criteria for AML. CR for low-blast AML: morphologic leukemia-free state, ANC of more than 1.0*10^9/L and ptl of >=100*10^9/L, transfusion independence, no residual evidence of extramedullary leukemia. CR with incomplete blood count recovery for low-blast AML: some participants fulfill all criteria for CR except for residual neutropenia (<1.0*10^9/L)/TTP (<100*10^9/L). The percentages are rounded off to report the nearest whole numbers. (NCT02610777)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization until CR by Cycle 4 (cycle length=28 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^240.0
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 + Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^235.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With CR in Low-blast AML

Disease response for low-blast AML is based on the revised IWG response criteria for AML. CR for low-blast AML: morphologic leukemia-free state, ANC of more than 1.0*10^9/L and plt of >=1.0*10^9/L, transfusion independence, and no residual evidence of extramedullary leukemia. CR with incomplete blood count recovery for low-blast AML: some participants fulfill all of the criteria for CR except for residual neutropenia (<1.0*10^9/L) or thrombocytopenia (TTP) (<100*10^9/L). The percentages are rounded off to report the nearest whole numbers. (NCT02610777)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until CR (up to approximately 5 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^260.0
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 + Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^241.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With CR by Cycle 4

Disease responses for HR MDS or CMML were based on modified IWG response criteria for MDS and for low-blast AML on revised IWG response criteria for AML. CR for HR MDS or CMML: <=5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines in bone marrow, and >=11 g/dL Hb, >=100*10^9/L plt, ANC >=1.0*10^9/L and 0% blasts in peripheral blood. CR for low-blast AML: morphologic leukemia-free state, ANC of more than 1.0*10^9/L and plt of >=100*10^9/L, transfusion independence, no residual evidence of extramedullary leukemia. CR with incomplete blood count recovery for low-blast AML: some participants fulfill all criteria for CR except for residual neutropenia (<1.0*10^9/L)/TTP (<100*10^9/L). The percentages are rounded off to report the nearest whole numbers. (NCT02610777)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until CR by Cycle 4 (cycle length is equal to [=] 28 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^213.2
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2 + Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^226.3

[back to top]

The Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events: Phase 2 (Randomized Stage)

The number of participants experiencing different types of adverse events (AE). An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of a study. A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any AE occurring at any dose that: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, and/or constitutes an important medical event. Adverse events were analyzed in terms of treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) was defined as events that began on or after the start of study drug through 28 days after the last study treatment. The severity/intensity of AEs were graded based upon the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.03) where Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Life-threatening, and Grade 5 = Death. (NCT02677922)
Timeframe: From first dose to 28 days after last dose (up to approximately 26 months)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants with at Least One TEAEParticipants with at Least One TEAE Related to Study Drug(s)Participants with at Least One Grade 3-4 TEAEParticipants with at least One Grade 3-4 TEAE Related to Study Drug(s)Participants with at Least One Grade 5 TEAEParticipants with at Least One Grade 5 TEAE Related to Study Drug(s)Participants with at Least One Serious TEAEParticipants with at Least One Serious TEAE Related to Study Drug(s)
Phase 2 Randomized Stage: AG-221 (100mg) + AZA686268501506429
Phase 2 Randomized Stage: AZA Monotherapy32263120202514

[back to top]

AUC (0-8)- Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve: Phase 2 (Randomized Stage)

Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 8 hours, calculated using the linear trapezoid rule. (NCT02677922)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 hours post dose (± 10 minutes) on day 1 of cycle 2

Intervention(h*ng/mL) (Mean)
Phase 2 Randomized Stage: AG-221 (100mg) + AZA100302.8231

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Health Utility Indices of the EQ-5D-5L: Phase 2 (Randomized Stage)

The European Quality of Life 5D-5L Scale (EQ-5D-5L) assesses general health-related quality of life. Health is defined in 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. Responses are coded so that a '1' indicates no problem, and '5' indicates the most serious problem. The responses for the 5 dimensions are combined in a 5-digit number. These health states are converted to a single index value using the crosswalk method to the EQ-5D-3L value set from the United Kingdom (UK). The EQ-5D-3L health utility index based on the UK population weights range from -0.594 to 1.0 with higher scores indicating higher health utility. Baseline results are obtained just prior to the start of study treatment on Day 1 of Cycle 1 and will serve as the baseline values. (NCT02677922)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 1 Cycle 5

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Phase 2 Randomized Stage: AG-221 (100mg) + AZA0.04
Phase 2 Randomized Stage: AZA Monotherapy0.02

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores of the EQ-5D-5L: Phase 2 (Randomized Stage)

"The European Quality of Life 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L) instrument has a respondent's self-rated today's health scale which is recorded on a VAS with endpoints labeled the best health you can imagine and the worst health you can imagine. The scale is numbered from 0 to 100 with 0 corresponding to the worst imaginable health state and 100 corresponding to the best imaginable health state. A high score represents a better level of QoL. Baseline results are obtained just prior to the start of study treatment on Day 1 of Cycle 1 and will serve as the baseline values." (NCT02677922)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 1 Cycle 5

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Phase 2 Randomized Stage: AG-221 (100mg) + AZA13.00
Phase 2 Randomized Stage: AZA Monotherapy1.65

[back to top]

Cmax- Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration: Phase 2 (Randomized Stage)

Cmax: Maximum observed plasma concentration, obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time data. (NCT02677922)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post dose (± 10 minutes) on day 1 of cycle 2

Intervention(ng/mL) (Mean)
Phase 2 Randomized Stage: AG-221 (100mg) + AZA15965.0

[back to top]

Complete Remission Rate: Phase 2 (Randomized Stage)

The percent of participants with morphologic complete remission (CR) according to modified International Working Group Acute Myeloid Leukemia Response Criteria (IWG AML). CR is defined as less than 5% blasts in a BM aspirate sample with marrow spicules and with a count of at least 200 nucleated cells. There should be no blasts with Auer rods and absence of extramedullary disease; plus the following conditions: absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1,000/μL, Platelet count ≥100,000/μL, and independent of red cell transfusions for ≥1 week before each response assessment. (NCT02677922)
Timeframe: From first dose up to approximately 26 months

InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
Phase 2 Randomized Stage: AG-221 (100mg) + AZA54.4
Phase 2 Randomized Stage: AZA Monotherapy12.1

[back to top]

Event-free Survival (EFS): Phase 2 (Randomized Stage)

Event-Free Survival is the time from date of randomization to the date of documented morphologic relapse, progression, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Morphologic Relapse is defined as either reappearance of ≥ 5% blasts in the BM not attributable to any other cause or the development of extramedullary disease. Progression is defined as a > 50% increase of BM blast count percentage from baseline to ≥ 20% for participants with 5 to 70% BM blasts at baseline or a doubling of absolute blast count in peripheral blood from baseline to ≥ 10 x 109/L (10,000/μL) for participants with > 70% BM blasts at baseline or the development of new extramedullary disease. (NCT02677922)
Timeframe: From randomization to the date of documented relapse, progression, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 26 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 2 Randomized Stage: AG-221 (100mg) + AZA15.9
Phase 2 Randomized Stage: AZA Monotherapy11.9

[back to top]

Hematologic Improvement (HI) Rate: Phase 2 (Randomized Stage)

The percent of participants with hematologic improvement neutrophil response (HI-N) + hematologic improvement platelet response (HI-P) + hematologic improvement erythroid response (HI-E) according to the International Working Group for Myelodysplastic Syndromes for Hematologic Improvement (IWG MDS HI) criteria. HI-E is defined as a hemoglobin increase by ≥ 1.5 g/dL and a relevant reduction in units of RBC transfusions by an absolute number of at least 4 RBC transfusions/8 week compared with the pretreatment transfusion number in the previous 8 week. HI-P is defined as an absolute increase of ≥ 30 X 10^9/L for participants starting with > 20 X and an increase from < 20 X 10^9/L to > 20 X 10^9/L and by at least 100%. HI-N is defined as At least 100% increase and an absolute increase > 0.5 X 10^9/L. (NCT02677922)
Timeframe: From first dose up to approximately 26 months

InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
Phase 2 Randomized Stage: AG-221 (100mg) + AZA70.6
Phase 2 Randomized Stage: AZA Monotherapy57.6

[back to top]

One Year Survival Rate: Phase 2 (Randomized Stage)

The percent of participants alive at 1 year from randomization (NCT02677922)
Timeframe: From randomization to 1 year after randomization

InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
Phase 2 Randomized Stage: AG-221 (100mg) + AZA72.2
Phase 2 Randomized Stage: AZA Monotherapy69.6

[back to top]

AUC (0-24)- Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve: Phase 2 (Randomized Stage)

AUC0-24: Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 hours, calculated using the linear trapezoid rule. (NCT02677922)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post dose (± 10 minutes) on day 1 of cycle 2

Intervention(h*ng/mL) (Mean)
Phase 2 Randomized Stage: AG-221 (100mg) + AZA285864.2637

[back to top]

The Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events: Phase 1B (Dose Finding and Expansion Stage)

The number of participants experiencing different types of adverse events (AE). An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of a study. A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any AE occurring at any dose that: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, and/or constitutes an important medical event. Adverse events were analyzed in terms of treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) was defined as events that began on or after the start of study drug through 28 days after the last study treatment. The severity/intensity of AEs were graded based upon the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.03) where Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Life-threatening, and Grade 5 = Death. (NCT02677922)
Timeframe: From first dose to 28 days after last dose (up to approximately 13 months)

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants with at Least One TEAEParticipants with at Least One TEAE Related to Study Drug(s)Participants with at Least One Grade 3-4 TEAEParticipants with at least One Grade 3-4 TEAE Related to Study Drug(s)Participants with at Least One Grade 5 TEAEParticipants with at Least One Grade 5 TEAE Related to Study Drug(s)Participants with at Least One Serious TEAEParticipants with at Least One Serious TEAE Related to Study Drug(s)Participants with at Least One TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug(s)Participants with at Least One Study Drug Related TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study DrugParticipants with at Least One TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug(s)Participants with at Least One TEAE Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Drug(s)Participants with at Least One Study Drug(s) Related TEAE Leading to Study Drug Dose ReductionParticipants with at Least One Study Drug(s) Related TEAE Leading to Study Drug Dose Interruption
Phase 1b Dose-finding Stage: AG-120 (500mg) + AZA77741041102212
Phase 1b Dose-finding Stage: AG-221 (100mg) + AZA33320030101301
Phase 1b Dose-finding Stage: AG-221 (200mg) + AZA33321021001312
Phase 1b Expansion Stage: AG-120 (500mg) + AZA16161510201154151158

[back to top]

Cmax- Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration: Phase 1B (Expansion Stage)

Cmax: Maximum observed plasma concentration, obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time data (NCT02677922)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post dose (± 10 minutes) on day 1 of cycle 1 and 2

Intervention(ng/mL) (Mean)
CYCLE 1 DAY 1CYCLE 2 DAY 1
Phase 1b Expansion Stage: AG-120 (500mg) + AZA6058.06340.7

[back to top] [back to top]

AUC (0-8)- Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve: Phase 1B (Expansion Stage)

Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 8 hours, calculated using the linear trapezoid rule. (NCT02677922)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post dose (± 10 minutes) on day 1 of cycle 1 and 2

Intervention(h*ng/mL) (Mean)
CYCLE 1 DAY 1CYCLE 2 DAY 1
Phase 1b Expansion Stage: AG-120 (500mg) + AZA31952.446544291.5504

[back to top]

Tmax- Time of Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration: Phase 2 (Randomized Stage)

Tmax: Time of maximum observed plasma concentration, obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time data. (NCT02677922)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours post dose (± 10 minutes) on day 1 of cycle 2

Intervention(h) (Median)
Phase 2 Randomized Stage: AG-221 (100mg) + AZA2.5333

[back to top]

Time to Response: Phase 2 (Randomized Stage)

Time from first dose of study drug to first documented MLFS/CR/CRi/CRp/PR according to modified IWG AML response criteria. Complete remission (CR) and morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS) are defined as <5% blasts in a BM aspirate sample with marrow spicules and a count of ≥200 nucleated cells. There should be no blasts with Auer rods and no extramedullary disease. CR must also include the following conditions: absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1,000/μL, Platelet count ≥100,000/μL, and independent of red cell transfusions for ≥1 week before each response assessment. Complete remission with incomplete neutrophil recovery (CRi) is all criteria of CR except ANC. Complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) is all criteria of CR except platelet count. partial remission (PR) is defined as all hematologic criteria of CR with a >50% decrease in the percentage of BM blasts to 5% to 25%. (<5% considered if Auer rods are present). (NCT02677922)
Timeframe: From first dose to to first documented MLFS/CR/CRi/CRp/PR (up to approximately 26 months)

InterventionMonths (Mean)
Phase 2 Randomized Stage: AG-221 (100mg) + AZA3.05
Phase 2 Randomized Stage: AZA Monotherapy3.42

[back to top]

The Number of Participants Experiencing Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs): Phase 1B (Dose Finding Stage)

Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) are defined as an event that constitute a change from baseline irrespective of outcome and determined by the investigator to be related to treatment. The DLT-evaluable participants were defined as participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug in the Phase 1b Dose-Finding Stage and either had a DLT during Cycle 1 (regardless of amount of study drug exposure), or had no DLT and completed at least 75% of AG-120 or AG-221 doses (21 out of 28 days) and a minimum of 5 doses of AZA, at least 50% of the planned combination doses for AG-120 or AG-221 and AZA administered together (in the same day for 4 out of 7 days) in the first 28 days from C1D1, and were also considered by the Clinical Study Team to have sufficient safety data available to conclude that a DLT did not occur during Cycle 1. (NCT02677922)
Timeframe: From first dose to 28 days after first dose

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 1b Dose-finding Stage: AG-221 (100mg) + AZA0
Phase 1b Dose-finding Stage: AG-221 (200mg) + AZA0
Phase 1b Dose-finding Stage: AG-120 (500mg) + AZA0

[back to top]

Duration of Response: Phase 2 (Randomized Stage)

The time from first documented CR/CRi/CRp/PR/MLFS to documented morphologic relapse, progression, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. CR and MLFS are defined as <5% blasts in a BM aspirate sample with marrow spicules + a count of ≥200 nucleated cells with no blasts with Auer rods + no extramedullary disease. CR must also include: ANC ≥ 1,000/μL, Platelet count ≥100,000/μL, + independent of red cell transfusions for ≥1 week before assessment. CRi is all criteria of CR except ANC. CRp is all criteria of CR except platelet count. PR is defined as all hematologic criteria of CR with >50% decrease in BM blasts to 5%-25%. Relapse is defined as reappearance of ≥ 5% blasts in the BM not attributable to other cause or development of extramedullary disease. Progression is defined as > 50% increase of BM blast count from baseline to ≥ 20% or a doubling of absolute blast count in peripheral blood from baseline to ≥ 10,000/μL or development of new extramedullary disease. (NCT02677922)
Timeframe: From first dose up to approximately 26 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 2 Randomized Stage: AG-221 (100mg) + AZA24.1
Phase 2 Randomized Stage: AZA Monotherapy9.9

[back to top] [back to top]

Overall Survival: Phase 2 (Randomized Stage)

Overall survival (OS) is defined as time from randomization to death due to any cause. (NCT02677922)
Timeframe: From randomization to date of death (up to approximately 26 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 2 Randomized Stage: AG-221 (100mg) + AZA22.0
Phase 2 Randomized Stage: AZA Monotherapy22.3

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate: Phase 2 (Randomized Stage)

The percent of participants with MLFS + CR + CRi + CRp + PR according to modified International Working Group Acute Myeloid Leukemia (IWG AML) response criteria as assessed by investigator. Complete response (CR) and morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS) are defined as <5% blasts in a BM aspirate sample with marrow spicules and a count of ≥200 nucleated cells. There should be no blasts with Auer rods and no extramedullary disease. CR must also include: absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1,000/μL, Platelet count ≥100,000/μL, and independent of red cell transfusions for ≥1 week before each response assessment. Complete remission with incomplete neutrophil recovery (CRi) is all criteria of CR except ANC. Complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) is all criteria of CR except platelet count. Partial remission (PR) is defined as all hematologic criteria of CR with a >50% decrease in the percentage of BM blasts to 5% to 25%. (<5% considered if Auer rods are present). (NCT02677922)
Timeframe: From first dose up to approximately 26 months

InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
Phase 2 Randomized Stage: AG-221 (100mg) + AZA73.5
Phase 2 Randomized Stage: AZA Monotherapy36.4

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate: Phase 1B (Dose Finding and Expansion Stage)

Percent of participants with MLFS + CR + CRi + CRp + PR according to modified International Working Group Acute Myeloid Leukemia (IWG AML) response criteria as assessed by investigator. Complete response (CR) and morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS) are defined as <5% blasts in a BM aspirate sample with marrow spicules and a count of ≥200 nucleated cells. There should be no blasts with Auer rods and no extramedullary disease. CR must also include: absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1,000/μL, Platelet count ≥100,000/μL, and independent of red cell transfusions for ≥1 week before each response assessment. Complete remission with incomplete neutrophil recovery (CRi) is all criteria of CR except ANC. Complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) is all criteria of CR except platelet count. Partial remission (PR) is defined as all hematologic criteria of CR with a >50% decrease in the percentage of BM blasts to 5% to 25%. (<5% considered if Auer rods are present). (NCT02677922)
Timeframe: From first dose up to approximately 13 months

InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
Phase 1b Dose-finding Stage: AG-221 (100mg) + AZA66.7
Phase 1b Dose-finding Stage: AG-221 (200mg) + AZA66.7
Phase 1b Dose-finding Stage: AG-120 (500mg) + AZA100
Phase 1b Expansion Stage: AG-120 (500mg) + AZA68.8

[back to top]

Tmax- Time of Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration: Phase 1B (Expansion Stage)

Tmax: Time of maximum observed plasma concentration, obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time data. (NCT02677922)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hours post dose (± 10 minutes) on day 1 of cycle 1 and 2

Intervention(h) (Median)
CYCLE 1 DAY 1CYCLE 2 DAY 1
Phase 1b Expansion Stage: AG-120 (500mg) + AZA3.00002.5000

[back to top]

Safety of the Combination of Vadastuximab Talirine and Azacitidine Measured by the Number of Participants With Adverse Events and Laboratory Abnormalities

As defined by the number of participants with adverse events and laboratory abnormalities. Participants are included only once per row, even if the participant experienced multiple events applicable to the category. (NCT02706899)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE)Vadatuximab talirine-related TEAEAzacitidine-related TEAESerious TEAEVadatuximab talirine-related serious TEAEAzacitidine-related serious TEAETEAE of Grades 3-5Vadatuximab talirine-related TEAE of Grades 3-5Azacitidine-related TEAE of Grades 3-5TEAE with outcome of deathDose-limiting toxicity
33A (10 mcg/kg) + Azacitidine66644466600
33A (5 mcg/kg) + Azacitidine139139451291022

[back to top] [back to top]

Part 2 - Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of INCB057643.

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration INCB057643 administered as monotherapy in fed state. (NCT02711137)
Timeframe: C2D1

InterventionnM (Mean)
12mg QD INCB057643220

[back to top]

Percent Inhibition of Total Cellular Myc Protein Concentrations Before and After Administration of INCB057643 When Administered as Monotherapy in an Ex-vivo Assay

An ex vivo assay (utilized in monotherapy only), Measuring Total c-Myc protein expressed from an exogenously added cell line (KMS12BM) to patient plasma, before and after administration of INCB057643. (NCT02711137)
Timeframe: PD in plasma at pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours postdose, for C1D1 and C1D8, and 24hrs post dose for C1D1

,,
Intervention%Inhibition of Total c-Myc (Mean)
C1D1C1D8
12mg QD INCB0576432843.4
16mg QD INCB0576435465
8mg QD INCB0576432430

[back to top]

Part 2-Tmax: Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration of INCB057643

Time to maximum plasma concentration of INCB057643 administered as monotherapy in fed state (NCT02711137)
Timeframe: C2D1

Interventionhours (Median)
12mg QD INCB0576436.00

[back to top]

Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of INCB057643.

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration INCB057643 administered as monotherapy in fasted state. (NCT02711137)
Timeframe: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours on C1D1 and C1D8

,,
InterventionnM (Mean)
C1D1C1D8
12mg QD INCB057643266293
16mg QD INCB057643343340
8mg QD INCB057643201210

[back to top]

AUC0-t: Area Under the Single-dose Plasma Concentration-time Curve of INCB057643

Area under the single-dose plasma concentration-time curve from Hour 0 to the last quantifiable measurable plasma concentration of INCB057643 administered as monotherapy in fasted state (NCT02711137)
Timeframe: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours on C1D1

Interventionh*nM (Mean)
8mg QD INCB0576432090
12mg QD INCB0576432550
16mg QD INCB0576433210

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) With INCB057643 in Solid Tumors

Objective response rate is defined as the proportion of subjects who have an objective response using the applicable disease assessment criteria. ORR was proportion of participants with best overall response [complete response (CR) or partial response (PR)]. (NCT02711137)
Timeframe: Efficacy measures from screening through end of treatment and follow-up (every 9 weeks), up to approximately 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Myelofibrosis
Part3/Treatment Group E : 8 mg INCB057643 + Ruxolitinib 20mg0

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) With INCB057643 in Solid Tumors

Objective response rate is defined as the proportion of subjects who have an objective response using the applicable disease assessment criteria. ORR was proportion of participants with best overall response [complete response (CR) or partial response (PR)]. (NCT02711137)
Timeframe: Efficacy measures from screening through end of treatment and follow-up (every 9 weeks), up to approximately 24 months

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Solid Tumors
Part3/Treatment Group A : 8 mg INCB057643 + Gemcitabine 1000mg0
Part3/Treatment Group B : 8 mg INCB057643 + Paclitaxel 80mg1
Part3/Treatment Group C : 8 mg INCB057643 + Rucaparib 600mg0
Part3/Treatment Group D : 8 mg INCB057643 + Abir +Predni0

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) With INCB057643 in Solid Tumors

Objective response rate is defined as the proportion of subjects who have an objective response using the applicable disease assessment criteria. ORR was proportion of participants with best overall response [complete response (CR) or partial response (PR)]. (NCT02711137)
Timeframe: Efficacy measures from screening through end of treatment and follow-up (every 9 weeks), up to approximately 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
AMLMyelodysplastic Syndrome
Part1/Treatment Group B : 12mg QD INCB05764300

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) With INCB057643 in Solid Tumors

Objective response rate is defined as the proportion of subjects who have an objective response using the applicable disease assessment criteria. ORR was proportion of participants with best overall response [complete response (CR) or partial response (PR)]. (NCT02711137)
Timeframe: Efficacy measures from screening through end of treatment and follow-up (every 9 weeks), up to approximately 24 months

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Solid TumorsLymphoma
Part1/Treatment Group A : 12mg QD INCB05764300
Part1/Treatment Group A : 16mg QD INCB05764301
Part1/Treatment Group A : 8mg QD INCB05764301

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) With INCB057643 in Solid Tumors

Objective response rate is defined as the proportion of subjects who have an objective response using the applicable disease assessment criteria. ORR was proportion of participants with best overall response [complete response (CR) or partial response (PR)]. (NCT02711137)
Timeframe: Efficacy measures from screening through end of treatment and follow-up (every 9 weeks), up to approximately 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Multiple Myeloma
Part1/Treatment Group C : 8mg QD INCB0576430

[back to top]

AUC0-24: Area Under the Steady-state Plasma Concentration-time Curve of INCB057643 Administered as Monotherapy

Area under the steady-state plasma concentration-time curve over 1 dosing interval from Hour 0 to 24 for QD administration of INCB057643 administered as monotherapy in fed state. (NCT02711137)
Timeframe: C2D1

Interventionh*nM (Mean)
12mg QD INCB0576432980

[back to top]

AUC0-24: Area Under the Steady-state Plasma Concentration-time Curve of INCB057643 Administered as Monotherapy

Area under the steady-state plasma concentration-time curve over 1 dosing interval from Hour 0 to 24 for QD administration of INCB057643 administered as monotherapy in fasted state (NCT02711137)
Timeframe: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours on C1D8

Interventionh*nM (Mean)
8mg QD INCB0576431940
12mg QD INCB0576432740
16mg QD INCB0576433610

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) With INCB057643 in Solid Tumors

Objective response rate is defined as the proportion of subjects who have an objective response using the applicable disease assessment criteria. ORR was proportion of participants with best overall response [complete response (CR) or partial response (PR)]. (NCT02711137)
Timeframe: Efficacy measures from screening through end of treatment and follow-up (every 9 weeks), up to approximately 24 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
AMLMyelodysplastic SyndromeMyelofibrosis
Part1/Treatment Group B : 8mg QD INCB057643000
Part2/Treatment Group B : 12 mg INCB057643 Expansion Cohort100

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) With INCB057643 in Solid Tumors

Objective response rate is defined as the proportion of subjects who have an objective response using the applicable disease assessment criteria. ORR was proportion of participants with best overall response [complete response (CR) or partial response (PR)]. (NCT02711137)
Timeframe: Efficacy measures from screening through end of treatment and follow-up (every 9 weeks), up to approximately 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
AML
Part3/Treatment Group F : 8 mg INCB057643 + Azacitidine 75mg0

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) With INCB057643 in Solid Tumors

Objective response rate is defined as the proportion of subjects who have an objective response using the applicable disease assessment criteria. ORR was proportion of participants with best overall response [complete response (CR) or partial response (PR)]. (NCT02711137)
Timeframe: Efficacy measures from screening through end of treatment and follow-up (every 9 weeks), up to approximately 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Solid TumorsLymphomaGlioblastoma
Part2/Treatment Group A : 12 mg INCB057643 Expansion Cohort020

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE's).

Adverse events reported for the first time or worsening of a pre-existing event after first dose of study drug/treatment. (NCT02711137)
Timeframe: From screening through at least 30 days after end of treatment, up to approximately 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Part1/Treatment Group A : 8mg QD INCB0576434
Part1/Treatment Group A : 12mg QD INCB0576435
Part1/Treatment Group A : 16mg QD INCB0576438
Part1/Treatment Group B : 8mg QD INCB0576437
Part1/Treatment Group B : 12mg QD INCB0576435
Part1/Treatment Group C : 8mg QD INCB0576431
Part2/Treatment Group A : 12 mg INCB057643 Expansion Cohort86
Part2/Treatment Group B : 12 mg INCB057643 Expansion Cohort5
Part3/Treatment Group A : 8 mg INCB057643 + Gemcitabine 1000mg1
Part3/Treatment Group B : 8 mg INCB057643 + Paclitaxel 80mg2
Part3/Treatment Group C : 8 mg INCB057643 + Rucaparib 600mg4
Part3/Treatment Group D : 8 mg INCB057643 + Abir +Predni3
Part3/Treatment Group E : 8 mg INCB057643 + Ruxolitinib 20mg1
Part3/Treatment Group F : 8 mg INCB057643 + Azacitidine 75mg2

[back to top]

Tmax: Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration of INCB057643

Time to maximum plasma concentration of INCB057643 administered as monotherapy in fasted state (NCT02711137)
Timeframe: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 hours on C1D1 and C1D8

,,
Interventionhours (Median)
C1D1C1D8
12mg QD INCB05764322
16mg QD INCB0576432.002.00
8mg QD INCB0576432.001.00

[back to top]

CL/F of INCB059872 in Plasma When Received as Monotherapy

CL/F was defined as the apparent oral clearance of INCB059872. (NCT02712905)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15: 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours after INCB059872 dose

InterventionLiters per hour (Mean)
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 2 mg QOD32.9
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 2 mg QD26.3
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 3 mg QD22.1
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 4 mg QD22.1
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 5 mg QDNA
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 1 mg QDNA
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 2 mg QODNA
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 3 mg QOD23.1
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 3 mg QDNA
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 4 mg QOD21.1

[back to top]

Cmax of INCB059872 in Plasma When Received as Combination Therapy

Cmax was defined as the maximum observed plasma concentration of INCB059872. (NCT02712905)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15: 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours after INCB059872 dose

InterventionnM (Mean)
Group C: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 2 mg QD + ATRA44.3
Group C: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 3 mg QD + ATRA96.4
Group D: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 2 mg QD + Azacitidine38.2
Group E: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 3 mg QOD + Nivolumab78.0

[back to top]

Cmax of INCB059872 in Plasma When Received as Monotherapy

Cmax was defined as the maximum observed plasma concentration of INCB059872. (NCT02712905)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15: 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours after INCB059872 dose

Interventionnanomolar (nM) (Mean)
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 2 mg QOD33.4
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 2 mg QD46.0
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 3 mg QD73.1
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 4 mg QD110
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 5 mg QDNA
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 1 mg QD25.7
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 2 mg QOD46.0
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 3 mg QOD70.6
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 3 mg QDNA
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 4 mg QOD98.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants Receiving INCB059872 Combination Therapy With Any TEAE

AEs were defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related, that occurred after a participant provided informed consent. Abnormal laboratory values or test results occurring after informed consent constituted AEs only if they induced clinical signs or symptoms, were considered clinically meaningful, required therapy (e.g., hematologic abnormality that required transfusion), or required changes in the study drug(s). TEAEs were defined as AEs either reported for the first time or the worsening of pre-existing events after the first dose of study drug and within 30 days of the last administration of study drug. (NCT02712905)
Timeframe: up to 1387 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group C: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 2 mg QD + ATRA5
Group C: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 3 mg QD + ATRA7
Group C: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 4 mg QD + ATRA1
Group D: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 2 mg QD + Azacitidine7
Group D: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 3 mg QD + Azacitidine1
Group E: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 3 mg QOD + Nivolumab6

[back to top]

Number of Participants Receiving INCB059872 Monotherapy With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)

Adverse events (AEs) were defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related, that occurred after a participant provided informed consent. Abnormal laboratory values or test results occurring after informed consent constituted AEs only if they induced clinical signs or symptoms, were considered clinically meaningful, required therapy (e.g., hematologic abnormality that required transfusion), or required changes in the study drug(s). TEAEs were defined as AEs either reported for the first time or the worsening of pre-existing events after the first dose of study drug and within 30 days of the last administration of study drug. (NCT02712905)
Timeframe: up to 588 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 2 mg QOD3
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 2 mg QD6
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 3 mg QOD1
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 3 mg QD5
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 4 mg QD18
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 5 mg QD2
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 1 mg QD3
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 2 mg QOD3
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 2 mg QD1
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 3 mg QOD36
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 3 mg QD3
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 4 mg QOD7

[back to top]

ORR for Altering the Natural History of the Disease in Participants With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Who Received INCB059872 Monotherapy

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a best overall response of complete remission or complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), per the International Working Group Response Criteria for AML, recorded before and including the first event of progression (treatment failure, relapse, and PD) based on altering the natural history of the disease. Complete remission: absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1.0 x 10^9/Liter (L), platelet count ≥100 x 10^9/L, bone marrow with less than 5% blast cells, Auer rods not detectable; no platelet, or whole blood transfusions for 7 days prior to the date of the hematology assessment. CRi: complete remission, but the ANC count may be < 1.0 x 10^9/L and/or the platelet count may be <100 x 10^9/L. (NCT02712905)
Timeframe: up to 85 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 2 mg QOD0.0
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 2 mg QD0.0
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 3 mg QD0.0
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 4 mg QD0.0
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 5 mg QD0.0

[back to top]

ORR for Altering the Natural History of the Disease in Participants With AML Who Received Combination Therapy

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a best overall response of complete remission or CRi, per the International Working Group Response Criteria for AML, recorded before and including the first event of progression (treatment failure, relapse, and PD) based on altering the natural history of the disease. Complete remission: ANC ≥1.0 x 10^9/L, platelet count ≥100 x 10^9/L, bone marrow with less than 5% blast cells, Auer rods not detectable; no platelet, or whole blood transfusions for 7 days prior to the date of the hematology assessment. CRi: complete remission, but the ANC count may be < 1.0 x 10^9/L and/or the platelet count may be <100 x 10^9/L. (NCT02712905)
Timeframe: up to 208 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group C: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 2 mg QD + ATRA20.0
Group C: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 3 mg QD + ATRA0.0
Group C: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 4 mg QD + ATRA0.0
Group D: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 2 mg QD + Azacitidine16.7
Group D: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 3 mg QD + Azacitidine0.0

[back to top]

ORR for Altering the Natural History of the Disease in Participants With MDS Who Received Combination Therapy

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a best overall response of complete remission, partial remission, or bone marrow complete remission, per the International Working Group Response Criteria for MDS, recorded before and including the first event of progression (treatment failure, relapse after CR or PR, disease transformation, and PD) based on altering the natural history of the disease. Complete remission: <5% bone marrow blasts without evidence of dysplasia; peripheral blood counts: hemoglobin ≥11 g/dL, neutrophils ≥1 x 10^9/L, platelets ≥100 x 10^9/L. Partial remission: meeting complete remission criteria, but bone marrow blasts decreased by ≥50% from pre-treatment, but still ≥5%. Bone marrow complete remission: ≤5% bone marrow blasts and decrease by ≥50% from pre-treatment. (NCT02712905)
Timeframe: up to 85 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group D: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 2 mg QD + Azacitidine0.0

[back to top]

ORR for Altering the Natural History of the Disease in Participants With Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Who Received INCB059872 Monotherapy

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a best overall response of complete remission, partial remission, or bone marrow complete remission, per the International Working Group Response Criteria for MDS, recorded before and including the first event of progression (treatment failure, relapse after CR or PR, disease transformation, and PD) based on altering the natural history of the disease. Complete remission: <5% bone marrow blasts without evidence of dysplasia; peripheral blood counts: hemoglobin ≥11 grams per deciliter (g/dL), neutrophils ≥1 x 10^9/L, platelets ≥100 x 10^9/L. Partial remission: meeting complete remission criteria, but bone marrow blasts decreased by ≥50% from pre-treatment, but still ≥5%. Bone marrow complete remission: ≤5% bone marrow blasts and decrease by ≥50% from pre-treatment. (NCT02712905)
Timeframe: up to 61 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 2 mg QD0.0
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 3 mg QD0.0
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 4 mg QD0.0

[back to top]

AUC(0-τ) of INCB059872 in Plasma When Received as Combination Therapy

AUC(0-τ) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time = 0 to the end of the dosing period of INCB059872. (NCT02712905)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15: 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours after INCB059872 dose

InterventionnM x hour (Mean)
Group C: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 2 mg QD + ATRA225
Group C: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 3 mg QD + ATRA377
Group D: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 2 mg QD + Azacitidine273
Group E: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 3 mg QOD + Nivolumab357

[back to top]

AUC(0-τ) of INCB059872 in Plasma When Received as Monotherapy

AUC(0-τ) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time = 0 to the end of the dosing period of INCB059872. (NCT02712905)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15: 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours after INCB059872 dose

InterventionnM x hour (Mean)
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 2 mg QOD196
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 2 mg QD216
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 3 mg QD374
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 4 mg QD486
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 5 mg QDNA
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 1 mg QDNA
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 2 mg QODNA
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 3 mg QOD361
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 3 mg QDNA
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 4 mg QOD495

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Participants With the Indicated Type of Solid Tumors Who Received INCB059872 Monotherapy

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a best overall response of complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR), per investigator assessment according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RESIST v1.1), recorded before and including the first event of progressive disease (PD). CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no appearance of any new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in the short axis to <10 millimeters (mm). PR: complete disappearance or at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters, no new lesions, and no progression of non-target lesions. (NCT02712905)
Timeframe: up to 518 days

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
SCLCOther solid tumors
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 3 mg QD0.050.0
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 4 mg QOD0.00.0

[back to top]

ORR in Participants With SCLC Who Received Combination Therapy

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a best overall response of CR or a PR, per investigator assessment according to RESIST v1.1, recorded before and including the first event of PD. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no appearance of any new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in the short axis to <10 mm. PR: complete disappearance or at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters, no new lesions, and no progression of non-target lesions. (NCT02712905)
Timeframe: up to 1353 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group E: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 3 mg QOD + Nivolumab20.0

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Participants With the Indicated Type of Solid Tumors Who Received INCB059872 Monotherapy

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a best overall response of complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR), per investigator assessment according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RESIST v1.1), recorded before and including the first event of progressive disease (PD). CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no appearance of any new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in the short axis to <10 millimeters (mm). PR: complete disappearance or at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters, no new lesions, and no progression of non-target lesions. (NCT02712905)
Timeframe: up to 518 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumorsOther solid tumors
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 1 mg QD0.00.0

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Participants With the Indicated Type of Solid Tumors Who Received INCB059872 Monotherapy

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a best overall response of complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR), per investigator assessment according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RESIST v1.1), recorded before and including the first event of progressive disease (PD). CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no appearance of any new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in the short axis to <10 millimeters (mm). PR: complete disappearance or at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters, no new lesions, and no progression of non-target lesions. (NCT02712905)
Timeframe: up to 518 days

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Other solid tumors
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 2 mg QD0.0
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 2 mg QOD0.0

[back to top]

CL/F of INCB059872 in Plasma When Received as Combination Therapy

CL/F was defined as the apparent oral clearance of INCB059872. (NCT02712905)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15: 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours after INCB059872 dose

InterventionLiters per hour (Mean)
Group C: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 2 mg QD + ATRA25.1
Group C: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 3 mg QD + ATRA20.7
Group D: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 2 mg QD + Azacitidine19.0
Group E: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 3 mg QOD + Nivolumab23.5

[back to top]

Tmax of INCB059872 in Plasma When Received as Monotherapy

tmax was defined as the time to the maximum observed plasma concentration of INCB059872. (NCT02712905)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15: 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours after INCB059872 dose

Interventionhours (Median)
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 2 mg QOD0.5
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 2 mg QD1
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 3 mg QD1
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 4 mg QD0.5
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 5 mg QDNA
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 1 mg QD2.0
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 2 mg QOD2
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 3 mg QOD1
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 3 mg QDNA
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 4 mg QOD0.5

[back to top]

Tmax of INCB059872 in Plasma When Received as Combination Therapy

tmax was defined as the time to the maximum observed plasma concentration of INCB059872. (NCT02712905)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15: 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours after INCB059872 dose

Interventionhours (Median)
Group C: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 2 mg QD + ATRA1.0
Group C: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 3 mg QD + ATRA0.5
Group D: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 2 mg QD + Azacitidine0.5
Group E: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 3 mg QOD + Nivolumab1.0

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Participants With the Indicated Type of Solid Tumors Who Received INCB059872 Monotherapy

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a best overall response of complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR), per investigator assessment according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RESIST v1.1), recorded before and including the first event of progressive disease (PD). CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no appearance of any new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in the short axis to <10 millimeters (mm). PR: complete disappearance or at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters, no new lesions, and no progression of non-target lesions. (NCT02712905)
Timeframe: up to 518 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
SCLCEwing's sarcomaPoorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumorsOther solid tumors
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 3 mg QOD0.00.00.00.0

[back to top]

t1/2 of INCB059872 in Plasma When Received as Monotherapy

t1/2 was defined as the half-life of INCB059872. (NCT02712905)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15: 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours after INCB059872 dose

Interventionhours (Mean)
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 2 mg QOD3.15
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 2 mg QD3.30
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 3 mg QD3.13
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 4 mg QD3.67
Group A: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 5 mg QDNA
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 1 mg QDNA
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 2 mg QODNA
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 3 mg QOD3.57
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 3 mg QDNA
Group B: INCB059872 Monotherapy; 4 mg QOD4.28

[back to top]

t1/2 of INCB059872 in Plasma When Received as Combination Therapy

t1/2 was defined as the half-life of INCB059872. (NCT02712905)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15: 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours after INCB059872 dose

Interventionhours (Mean)
Group C: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 2 mg QD + ATRA3.95
Group C: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 3 mg QD + ATRA3.41
Group D: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 2 mg QD + Azacitidine3.08
Group E: Combination Therapy; INCB059872 3 mg QOD + Nivolumab3.79

[back to top]

Objective Response Defined as Best Overall Response of Complete Remission, Partial Remission or Haematological Improvement According to the International Working Group 2006 Criteria

Objective response defined as best overall response of complete remission, partial remission or haematological improvement according to the International Working Group 2006 criteria. It is based on Complete remission (CR): Bone marrow: <=5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines, Peripheral blood: Hemoglobin >=11 Grams Per Decilitre (g/dL), Platelets >=100 x 109/L, Neutrophils >=1.0 x 109/L, Blasts 0%. Peripheral blood responses had to last at least 4 weeks to qualify for CR. Partial remission (PR): All CR criteria if abnormal before treatment except: Bone marrow blasts decreased by >=50% to baseline but still >5%, Cellularity and morphology not relevant. Peripheral blood responses must last at least 4 weeks to qualify for PR. Haematological improvement (HI): HI was evaluated in patients with abnormal pretreatment values based on Erythroid response, Platelet response, Neutrophil response. Peripheral blood responses had to last at least 8 weeks to qualify for HI. (NCT02721875)
Timeframe: Up to 168 days

InterventionParticipants (Number)
YesNo
Volasertib Monotherapy01

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Volasertib

The MTD was defined as the highest dose with less than 35% risk of the true dose limiting toxicities (DLT) rate being above 0.33 for schedule A, and the highest dose with less than 40% risk of the true DLT rate being above 0.33 for schedule B. The phase I dose-finding was to be guided by a Bayesian 2-parameter logistic regression model (BLRM) with overdose control in each schedule separately. (NCT02721875)
Timeframe: First treatment cycle, up to 28 days

InterventionMilligram (mg)/ meter square (m2) (Number)
Volasertib MonotherapyNA

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) in the First Cycle

DLT was defined as any of the following adverse events (AEs) considered to be related to study drug: 1. Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) v4.03 ≥Grade 3 drug related non- haematological toxicity, excluding; ≥Grade 3 untreated nausea, vomiting or diarrhea. Any laboratory abnormality - not considered clinically significant by investigator or resolved spontaneously or could have been recovered with appropriate treatment within 7 days. Grade 3 infection which could be recovered with appropriate treatment within 7 days. Azacitidine injection site reaction or complications related to azacitidine injection. 2. Febrile neutropenia as defined by CTCAE which could not recovered with appropriate treatment within 7 days. 3. Inability to deliver full dose of volasertib according to the assigned dose level within Cycle 1 due to drug-related AEs. 4. Haematological DLTs. 5. Any other drug-related AEs that resulted in the delay of starting new treatment cycle for ≥4 weeks. (NCT02721875)
Timeframe: First treatment cycle, up to 28 days

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Volasertib Monotherapy0

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over the Time Interval From Zero to the Last Measured Time Point tz of Volasertib (AUC0-tz) (for Monotherapy)

Area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the time interval from zero to the last measured time point tz of volasertib (AUC0-tz) (for monotherapy). (NCT02721875)
Timeframe: Pharmacokinetic (PK) samples were taken at 5 minutes before drug administration and 0:30, 1:00, 2:00, 3:00, 4:00, 24:00, 167:55, 168:30, 169:00, 169:30, 170:00, 171:00, 172:00, 192:00, 336:00, 504:00, 672:00 hours after drug administration

InterventionNanogram(ng)*hour(h)/milliliter(mL) (Number)
Cycle 1 - Day 1Cycle 1 - Day 8
Volasertib Monotherapy24805460

[back to top]

Maximum Measured Plasma Concentration of Volasertib (Cmax) (for Monotherapy)

Maximum measured plasma concentration of volasertib (Cmax) (for monotherapy). (NCT02721875)
Timeframe: PK samples were taken at 5 minutes before drug administration and 0:30, 1:00, 2:00, 3:00, 4:00, 24:00, 167:55, 168:30, 169:00, 169:30, 170:00, 171:00, 172:00, 192:00, 336:00, 504:00, 672:00 hours after drug administration

InterventionNanogram(ng)*/milliliter(mL) (Number)
Cycle 1 - Day 1Cycle 1 - Day 8
Volasertib Monotherapy467553

[back to top]

MDS Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Time to AML Transformation

Participants were monitored for transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent for further data collection, or the end of the trial. Time to transformation to AML is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date the participant had documented transformation to AML (defined as at least 30% of myeloblasts in the bone marrow). Participants with no transformation to AML were censored at the date of their last disease assessment. (NCT02775903)
Timeframe: From randomization to the date the participant had documented transformation to AML (up to approximately 34 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
MDS: Azacitidine + Durvalumab20.8
MDS: Azacitidine Alone27.7

[back to top]

MDS Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Duration of Response

Duration of response is defined as the time from when the first overall response (complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), marrow complete remission (mCR), and/or hematological improvement (HI)) was observed until relapse, progressive disease (PD), or death, as defined by the International Working Group (IWG) 2006 response criteria and central review. If no relapse, PD, or death was observed, the duration of response was censored at the last response assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. Response was assessed following every 3 treatment cycles until treatment discontinuation. (NCT02775903)
Timeframe: From randomization to the first overall response, or death (up to approximately 34 months)

InterventionWeeks (Median)
MDS: Azacitidine + Durvalumab33.9
MDS: Azacitidine Alone39.7

[back to top]

MDS Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD), relapse, or death due to any cause during or after the treatment period, whichever occurred first, according to the International Working Group (IWG) 2006 response criteria for MDS and central review. Participants who were still alive and progression-free were censored at the date of their last response assessment. Progressive disease is defined as follows: - an increase in BM blasts relative to nadir: •If nadir less than 5% blasts: ≥ 50% increase in blasts to > 5% blasts •If nadir 5% - 10% blasts: ≥ 50% increase in blasts to > 10% blasts •If nadir 10% - 20% blasts: ≥ 50% increase in blasts to > 20% blasts •If nadir 20% - 30% blasts: ≥ 50% increase in blasts to > 30% blasts And any of the following: •At least 50% decrement from maximum remission/response levels in granulocytes or platelets •Reduction in Hgb concentration by ≥ 2 g/dL •Transfusion dependence (NCT02775903)
Timeframe: From randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD), relapse, or death due to any cause (up to approximately 34 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
MDS: Azacitidine + Durvalumab8.7
MDS: Azacitidine Alone8.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Selected Chemistry Parameters I

Baseline values are defined as the last assessment of a particular parameter prior to administration of the participants first dose. (NCT02775903)
Timeframe: Baseline and last lab measurement collected in Cycle 2 (Last measurement could be taken either on Day 1, 8, 15 or 22)

Interventiong/L (Mean)
MDS: Azacitidine + Durvalumab-1.8
MDS: Azacitidine Alone-1.1
AML: Azacitidine + Durvalumab-1.8
AML: Azacitidine Alone-3.8

[back to top]

AML Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Hematologic Improvement

Hematological improvement was defined as participants with a erythroid response (HI-E), platelet response (HI-P) or neutrophil response (HI-NE) for at least 8 weeks, according to the IWG 2006 response criteria: Hi-E (in participants with pretreatment hemoglobin < 11 g/dL or red blood cell (RBC)-transfusion dependent): Hemoglobin increase of ≥ 1.5 g/dL, or reduction in units of RBC transfusions of at least 4 RBC transfusions/8 weeks compared with the 8 weeks prior to pretreatment. HI-P (in participants with pretreatment platelet count < 100 × 10⁹/L): Absolute increase in platelets of ≥ 30 × 10⁹/L if pretreatment value > 20 × 10⁹/L or increase from < 20 × 10⁹/L to > 20 × 10⁹/L and by at least 100%. HI-N (in participants with pretreatment neutrophils < 1.0 × 10⁹/L): At least 100% increase in neutrophils and an absolute increase of > 0.5 × 10⁹/L. Response was assessed following every 3 treatment cycles until treatment discontinuation. (NCT02775903)
Timeframe: From randomization up to approximately 34 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
AML: Azacitidine + Durvalumab42.2
AML: Azacitidine Alone38.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Selected Hematology Parameters II

Baseline values are defined as the last assessment of a particular parameter prior to administration of the participants first dose. (NCT02775903)
Timeframe: Baseline and last lab measurement collected in Cycle 2 (Last measurement could be taken either on Day 1, 8, 15 or 22)

Interventiong/L (Mean)
MDS: Azacitidine + Durvalumab2.1
MDS: Azacitidine Alone5.7
AML: Azacitidine + Durvalumab2.2
AML: Azacitidine Alone-3.0

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time between randomization and death/censored date. Participants who were alive at the time of the clinical data cut-off were censored at the last known alive date. (NCT02775903)
Timeframe: From randomization to date of death or last known alive date (up to approximately 34 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
MDS: Azacitidine + Durvalumab11.6
MDS: Azacitidine Alone16.3
AML: Azacitidine + Durvalumab13.0
AML: Azacitidine Alone14.4

[back to top]

MDS Cohort: Kaplan Meier Estimate of Relapse-free Survival

Relapse-free survival is defined as the time from the date of first documented response (complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR)) to the date of disease relapse or death from any cause, whichever occurred first according to the International Working Group (IWG) 2006 response criteria for MDS and central review. Participants who were still alive and progression-free were censored at the date of their last response assessment. Participants who received a subsequent therapy before the date of disease relapse or death were censored at the time of subsequent therapy. Relapse after CR or PR is defined as at least one of the following: •Return to pretreatment bone marrow blast % •Decrement of ≥ 50% from maximum remission/response levels in granulocytes or platelets •Reduction in hemoglobin concentration by ≥ 1.5 g/dL or transfusion dependence. Response was assessed following every 3 treatment cycles until treatment discontinuation. (NCT02775903)
Timeframe: From randomization to to the date of disease relapse or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 34 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
MDS: Azacitidine + Durvalumab3.7
MDS: Azacitidine AloneNA

[back to top]

MDS Cohort: Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to First Response

Time to first response is defined as the time from randomization to the earliest date any response (complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), marrow complete remission (mCR), and/or hematological improvement (HI)) based on International Working Group (IWG) 2006 response criteria for MDS and central review. Participants who did not achieve any defined response were censored at the date of last adequate response assessment, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Response was assessed following every 3 treatment cycles until treatment discontinuation. (NCT02775903)
Timeframe: From randomization to the earliest date any response (up to approximately 34 months)

InterventionWeeks (Median)
MDS: Azacitidine + Durvalumab14.3
MDS: Azacitidine Alone18.4

[back to top]

MDS Cohort: Overall Response Rate

Overall response rate (ORR) is defined as the percentage of participants achieving a complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), marrow complete remission (mCR), and/or hematological improvement (HI) based on International Working Group (IWG) 2006 response criteria for MDS and central review. CR: ≤ 5% myeloblasts in bone marrow (BM), and peripheral blood: hemoglobin ≥ 11 g/dL; platelets ≥ 100 × 10⁹/L; neutrophils ≥ 1.0 × 10⁹/L; blasts 0% PR: BM blasts decreased by ≥ 50% but still > 5%; peripheral blood as for CR mCR: BM ≤ 5% myeloblasts and decrease by ≥ 50% HI: Any of the following: •Hemoglobin increase by ≥ 1.5 g/dL or reduction of units of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions of at least 4 RBC transfusions/8 weeks compared with pretreatment •Absolute increase in platelets of ≥ 30 × 10⁹/L if pretreatment value > 20 × 10⁹/L or increase from < 20 × 10⁹/L to > 20 × 10⁹/L and by at least 100% •At least 100% increase in neutrophils and an absolute increase of > 0.5 × 10⁹/L (NCT02775903)
Timeframe: Response was assessed following every 3 treatment cycles until treatment discontinuation; median duration of treatment was 239 days (AZA) and 215 days (DUR) in the AZA + DUR group and 210 days in the AZA alone group.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
MDS: Azacitidine + Durvalumab61.9
MDS: Azacitidine Alone47.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

"Treatment emergent adverse events are adverse events (AEs) that occurred or worsened on or after the first dose of study drug (durvalumab or azacitidine) and within 90 days after last dose of durvalumab or 28 days after last dose of azacitidine. A treatment-related TEAE is a TEAE where the causal relationship was assessed by the investigator as Suspected. The intensity of AEs was graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03: Grade 1 (Mild): asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2 (Moderate): minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care. Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5: Death due to AE." (NCT02775903)
Timeframe: From first dose to 90 days after last dose of durvalumab or 28 days after last dose of azacitidine proir to the extension study (up to approximately 34 months)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE)TEAE related to DURTEAE related to AZATEAE related to DUR or AZAGrade 3 TEAEGrade 3 TEAE related to DURGrade 3 TEAE related to AZAGrade 3 TEAE related to DUR or AZAGrade 4 TEAEGrade 4 TEAE related to DURGrade 4 TEAE related to AZAGrade 4 TEAE related to DUR or AZAGrade 5 TEAEGrade 5 TEAE related to DURGrade 5 TEAE related to AZAGrade 5 TEAE related to DUR or AZASerious TEAESerious TEAE related to DURSerious TEAE related to AZASerious TEAE related to DUR or AZATEAE leading to discontinuation of DURTEAE leading to discontinuation of AZATEAE leading to discontinuation of DUR or AZATEAE leading to dose reduction of AZATEAE leading to dose interruption of DURTEAE leading to dose interruption of AZATEAE leading to dose interruption of DUR or AZATEAE leading to ongoing DUR infusion interruption
AML: Azacitidine + Durvalumab6450565860293238431827282611156332534211322103439412
MDS: Azacitidine + Durvalumab38273135361818223316192210212341191450532427282

[back to top]

MDS Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Disease Transformation to AML

Disease transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is defined as at least 30% myeloblasts in the bone marrow. Participants were monitored for transformation to AML until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent for further data collection, or the end of the trial. Participants with no transformation to AML were censored at the date of their last disease assessment. (NCT02775903)
Timeframe: From randomization until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent for further data collection, or the end of the trial (up to approximately 34 months)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
MDS: Azacitidine + Durvalumab23.8
MDS: Azacitidine Alone19.0

[back to top]

AML Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Duration of Response

Duration of response is defined as the time from the first response morphologic complete remission (CR) or morphologic complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi)) was observed until relapse, PD, or death based on the IWG 2003 response criteria and central review. If no relapse, PD, or death was observed, the duration of response was censored at the last response assessment date that the participant was known to be progression-free. Response was assessed following every 3 treatment cycles until treatment discontinuation. (NCT02775903)
Timeframe: From randomization until relapse, PD, or death (up to approximately 34 months)

InterventionWeeks (Median)
AML: Azacitidine + Durvalumab24.6
AML: Azacitidine Alone52.0

[back to top]

One-year Survival

One-year survival is defined as the probability of survival at 1 year from randomization and is represented by the Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of participants alive after 1 year. (NCT02775903)
Timeframe: At 12 months after randomization

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
MDS: Azacitidine + Durvalumab49
MDS: Azacitidine Alone58
AML: Azacitidine + Durvalumab52
AML: Azacitidine Alone55

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Selected Chemistry Parameters II

Baseline values are defined as the last assessment of a particular parameter prior to administration of the participants first dose. (NCT02775903)
Timeframe: Baseline and last lab measurement collected in Cycle 2 (Last measurement could be taken either on Day 1, 8, 15 or 22)

,,,
InterventionU/L (Mean)
Alkaline Phosphatase (U/L)Alanine Aminotransferase (U/L)Aspartate Aminotransferase (U/L)Lipase (U/L)
AML: Azacitidine + Durvalumab12.30.3-0.9-2.0
AML: Azacitidine Alone15.54.00.53.1
MDS: Azacitidine + Durvalumab8.73.60.9-5.4
MDS: Azacitidine Alone4.50.4-0.8-10.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Selected Chemistry Parameters III

Baseline values are defined as the last assessment of a particular parameter prior to administration of the participants first dose. (NCT02775903)
Timeframe: Baseline and last lab measurement collected in Cycle 2 (Last measurement could be taken either on Day 1, 8, 15 or 22)

,,,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Calcium (mmol/L)Glucose (mmol/L)Potassium (mmol/L)Sodium (mmol/L)
AML: Azacitidine + Durvalumab-0.003-0.380.02-0.6
AML: Azacitidine Alone-0.039-0.020.04-1.6
MDS: Azacitidine + Durvalumab0.004-0.400.15-0.2
MDS: Azacitidine Alone0.016-0.19-0.010.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Selected Chemistry Parameters IV

Baseline values are defined as the last assessment of a particular parameter prior to administration of the participants first dose. (NCT02775903)
Timeframe: Baseline and last lab measurement collected in Cycle 2 (Last measurement could be taken either on Day 1, 8, 15 or 22)

,,,
Interventionumol/L (Mean)
Bilirubin (umol/L)Creatinine (umol/L)Urate (umol/L)
AML: Azacitidine + Durvalumab2.42.3-15.1
AML: Azacitidine Alone-0.0-0.6-29.1
MDS: Azacitidine + Durvalumab2.2-4.06.8
MDS: Azacitidine Alone1.2-2.9-3.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Selected Hematology Parameters I

Baseline values are defined as the last assessment of a particular parameter prior to administration of the participants first dose. (NCT02775903)
Timeframe: Baseline and last lab measurement collected in Cycle 2 (Last measurement could be taken either on Day 1, 8, 15 or 22)

,,,
Intervention10^9 cells/L (Mean)
Leukocytes (10^9/L)Lymphocytes (10^9/L)Neutrophils, Segmented (10^9/L)Platelets (10^9/L)
AML: Azacitidine + Durvalumab-2.050-0.3940.64625.9
AML: Azacitidine Alone-0.941-0.262-0.102-0.9
MDS: Azacitidine + Durvalumab-1.330-0.242-0.66526.7
MDS: Azacitidine Alone-0.497-0.085-0.266-2.6

[back to top]

Durvalumab Serum Concentration

(NCT02775903)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 end of infusion (EOI), Cycle 2 Day 1 pre-infusion, Cycle 4 Day 1 pre-infusion and EOI, and Cycle 6 Day 1 pre-infusion

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1 end of infusionCycle 2 Day 1 pre-infusionCycle 4 Day 1 pre-infusionCycle 4 Day 1 end of infusionCycle 6 Day 1 pre-infusion
AML: Azacitidine + Durvalumab378598.36954216.95678622.429391523.395142517.871
MDS: Azacitidine + Durvalumab375548.51184380.032132266.794433942.600114448.977

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

"Treatment emergent adverse events are adverse events (AEs) that occurred or worsened on or after the first dose of study drug (durvalumab or azacitidine) and within 90 days after last dose of durvalumab or 28 days after last dose of azacitidine. A treatment-related TEAE is a TEAE where the causal relationship was assessed by the investigator as Suspected. The intensity of AEs was graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03: Grade 1 (Mild): asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2 (Moderate): minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care. Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5: Death due to AE." (NCT02775903)
Timeframe: From first dose to 90 days after last dose of durvalumab or 28 days after last dose of azacitidine proir to the extension study (up to approximately 34 months)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE)TEAE related to AZATEAE related to DUR or AZAGrade 3 TEAEGrade 3 TEAE related to AZAGrade 3 TEAE related to DUR or AZAGrade 4 TEAEGrade 4 TEAE related to AZAGrade 4 TEAE related to DUR or AZAGrade 5 TEAEGrade 5 TEAE related to AZAGrade 5 TEAE related to DUR or AZASerious TEAESerious TEAE related to AZASerious TEAE related to DUR or AZATEAE leading to discontinuation of AZATEAE leading to discontinuation of DUR or AZATEAE leading to dose reduction of AZATEAE leading to dose interruption of AZATEAE leading to dose interruption of DUR or AZA
AML: Azacitidine Alone62505050272734171711114516163323232
MDS: Azacitidine Alone4133333016162715159112910101161919

[back to top]

MDS Cohort: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Cytogenetic Response

Cytogenetic response is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a complete cytogenetic response or partial cytogenetic response according to the International Working Group (IWG) 2006 response criteria and central review. Complete cytogenetic response: Disappearance of the baseline chromosomal abnormality without appearance of new abnormalities. Partial cytogenetic response: At least 50% reduction of the chromosomal abnormality. Response was assessed following every 3 treatment cycles until treatment discontinuation. (NCT02775903)
Timeframe: From randomization up to approximately 34 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
MDS: Azacitidine + Durvalumab47.6
MDS: Azacitidine Alone34.8

[back to top]

AML Cohort: Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to First Response

Time to first response is defined as the time between the date of randomization and the earliest date any response (CR or CRi) was observed based on the modified International Working Group (IWG) 2003 response criteria for AML and central review. Participants who did not achieve any defined response were censored at the date of last adequate response assessment, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Response was assessed following every 3 treatment cycles until treatment discontinuation. (NCT02775903)
Timeframe: From randomization and the earliest date any response (up to approximately 34 months)

InterventionWeeks (Median)
AML: Azacitidine + DurvalumabNA
AML: Azacitidine Alone25.3

[back to top]

AML Cohort: Kaplan Meier Estimate of Relapse-free Survival

Relapse-free survival is defined as time from the date of first documented response (morphologic complete remission (CR) or morphologic complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi)) to the date of disease relapse or death from any cause, whichever occurred first based on the modified International Working Group (IWG) 2003 response criteria for AML and central review. Participants who were still alive and progression-free were censored at the date of their last response assessment. Participants who received a subsequent therapy before the date of disease relapse or death were censored at the time of subsequent therapy. (NCT02775903)
Timeframe: From randomization to the date of disease relapse or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 34 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
AML: Azacitidine + Durvalumab9.5
AML: Azacitidine Alone12.2

[back to top]

AML Cohort: Overall Response Rate

Overall response rate for AML is defined as the percentage of participants achieving an overall response of morphologic complete remission (CR) or morphologic complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) based on modified IWG 2003 response criteria for AML and central review. CR: The following conditions must be met: •Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.0 x10⁹/L •Platelet count ≥ 100 x10⁹/L •The bone marrow should contain less than 5% blast cells; •Auer rods should not be detectable; •No platelet, or whole blood transfusions for 7days prior to the date of the hematology assessment. CRi: Defined as a morphologic complete remission but the ANC count may be < 1.0 x10⁹/L and/or the platelet count may be < 100 x10⁹/L. (NCT02775903)
Timeframe: Response was assessed following every 3 treatment cycles until treatment discontinuation; median duration of treatment was 198 days (AZA) and 171 days (DUR) in the AZA + DUR group and 203 days in the AZA alone group.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
AML: Azacitidine + Durvalumab31.3
AML: Azacitidine Alone35.4

[back to top]

AML Cohort: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Cytogenetic Response

Complete cytogenetic response (CyCR) based on the modified International Working Group (IWG) 2003 response criteria is defined as morphologic complete remission with a reversion to a normal karyotype. The following conditions must be met: • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.0 x10⁹/L • Platelet count ≥ 100 x10⁹/L • The bone marrow should contain less than 5% blast cells; • Auer rods should not be detectable; • No platelet, or whole blood transfusions for 7days prior to the date of the hematology assessment. AND • Reversion to normal karyotype at time of CR (based on ≥ 10 metaphases). Response was assessed following every 3 treatment cycles until treatment discontinuation. (NCT02775903)
Timeframe: From randomization up to approximately 34 months)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
AML: Azacitidine + Durvalumab11.3
AML: Azacitidine Alone16.0

[back to top]

CL: Total Clearance for Pevonedistat When Administered Alone and in Combination With Azacitidine on Cycle 1 Day 5

(NCT02782468)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 5: pre-infusion and at multiple time points (up to 48 hours) post-infusion (Cycle length = 21 days [single agent arms]; 28 days [combination arms])

Interventionliter per hour (Geometric Mean)
Single Agent Arm: Pevonedistat 25 mg/m^224.0
Single Agent Arm: Pevonedistat 44 mg/m^234.8
Combination Arm: Pevonedistat 10 mg/m^2+ Azacitidine 75 mg/m^228.1
Combination Arm: Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2+ Azacitidine 75 mg/m^228.9

[back to top]

CL: Total Clearance for Pevonedistat When Administered Alone and in Combination With Azacitidine on Cycle 1 Day 1

(NCT02782468)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1: pre-infusion and at multiple time points (up to 48 hours) post-infusion (Cycle length = 21 days [single agent arms]; 28 days [combination arms])

Interventionliter per hour (Geometric Mean)
Single Agent Arm: Pevonedistat 25 mg/m^224.1
Single Agent Arm: Pevonedistat 44 mg/m^232.6
Combination Arm: Pevonedistat 10 mg/m^2+ Azacitidine 75 mg/m^222.8
Combination Arm: Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2+ Azacitidine 75 mg/m^228.4

[back to top]

AUC(0-tau): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time Tau Over the Dosing Interval for Pevonedistat When Administered Alone and in Combination With Azacitidine on Cycle 1 Day 5

(NCT02782468)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 5: pre-infusion and at multiple time points (up to 48 hours) post-infusion (Cycle length = 21 days [single agent arms]; 28 days [combination arms])

Interventionhour*nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Single Agent Arm: Pevonedistat 25 mg/m^21515
Single Agent Arm: Pevonedistat 44 mg/m^22163
Combination Arm: Pevonedistat 10 mg/m^2+ Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2647
Combination Arm: Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2+ Azacitidine 75 mg/m^21224

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With CR for Participants With MDS

CR was defined as participant with bone marrow: less than or equal to (<=) 5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines; persistent dysplasia was noted peripheral blood: Hgb >=11 g/dL, platelets >=100*10^9/L, neutrophils >=1.0*10^9 per liter (/L), blasts 0%. CR assessment was based on IWG Response Criteria. (NCT02782468)
Timeframe: From first dose up to 30 days after last dose of study drug or before start of subsequent antineoplastic therapy, whichever comes earlier up to Cycle 19 (up to Day 429, single agent)(Cycle=21 days) and Cycle 65 (up to Day 1850, combination)(Cycle=28 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Single Agent Arm: Pevonedistat 44 mg/m^20
Combination Arm: Pevonedistat 10 mg/m^2+ Azacitidine 75 mg/m^20
Combination Arm: Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2+ Azacitidine 75 mg/m^20

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With CR for Participants With AML

CR was defined as participant achieved the morphologic leukemia-free state and had an ANC of more than 1,000/mcL and platelets of >=100,000/mcL. A morphologic leukemia-free state requires <5% blasts in an aspirate sample with marrow spicules and with a count of at least 200 nucleated cells. CR assessment was based on IWG Response Criteria. (NCT02782468)
Timeframe: From first dose up to 30 days after last dose of study drug or before start of subsequent antineoplastic therapy, whichever comes earlier up to Cycle 19 (up to Day 429, single agent)(Cycle=21 days) and Cycle 65 (up to Day 1850, combination)(Cycle=28 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Single Agent Arm: Pevonedistat 25 mg/m^20
Single Agent Arm: Pevonedistat 44 mg/m^20
Combination Arm: Pevonedistat 10 mg/m^2+ Azacitidine 75 mg/m^250
Combination Arm: Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2+ Azacitidine 75 mg/m^20

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) for Participants With AML

ORR for AML was defined as the percentage of participants with a complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi), or partial remission (PR) based on Modified International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for AML. CR was defined as participant achieved the morphologic leukemia-free state and had an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of more than 1,000 per microliter (/mcL) and platelets of greater than or equal to (>=) 100,000/mcL. A morphologic leukemia-free state requires less than (<) 5 percent (%) blasts in an aspirate sample with marrow spicules and with a count of at least 200 nucleated cells. CRi was, after chemotherapy, some participants who fulfilled all of the criteria for CR except for residual neutropenia (<1,000/mcL) or thrombocytopenia (<100,000/mcL). PR designation required all the hematologic values for a CR but with a decrease of at least 50% in the percentage of blasts to between 5% and 25% in the bone marrow aspirate. (NCT02782468)
Timeframe: From first dose up to 30 days after last dose of study drug or before start of subsequent antineoplastic therapy, whichever comes earlier up to Cycle 19 (up to Day 429, single agent)(Cycle=21 days) and Cycle 65 (up to Day 1850, combination)(Cycle=28 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Single Agent Arm: Pevonedistat 25 mg/m^20
Single Agent Arm: Pevonedistat 44 mg/m^20
Combination Arm: Pevonedistat 10 mg/m^2+ Azacitidine 75 mg/m^250
Combination Arm: Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2+ Azacitidine 75 mg/m^280

[back to top]

ORR for Participants With MDS

ORR for MDS: Percentage of participants with CR,PR or hematologic improvement(HI) based on IWG Response Criteria. CR: BM:<=5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines; persistent dysplasia noted peripheral blood: hemoglobin (Hgb)>=11 gram per deciliter (g/dL),platelets>=100*10^9/L,neutrophils >=1.0*10^9/L, blasts 0%. PR:CR criteria if abnormal before treatment except: BM blasts decreased by >=50% from pretreatment but still>5%; cellularity, morphology not relevant. HI criteria: Erythroid response:Hgb up by >=1.5 g/dL; transfused RBC reduced by at least 4 red blood cell (RBC) transfusions/8 weeks comparatively last 8 weeks; Platelet response: Increase of >=30*10^9/L for participants starting with >20*10^9/L platelets; increase from <20*10^9/L to >20*10^9/L and by 100%; Neutrophil response: At least 100% and absolute increase >0.5*10^9/L; Progression/relapse after HI: Granulocytes/platelets decreased by 50% from maximum; Hgb reduced by >=1.5 g/dL; transfusion dependence. (NCT02782468)
Timeframe: From first dose up to 30 days after last dose of study drug or before start of subsequent antineoplastic therapy, whichever comes earlier up to Cycle 19 (up to Day 429, single agent)(Cycle=21 days) and Cycle 65 (up to Day 1850, combination)(Cycle=28 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Single Agent Arm: Pevonedistat 44 mg/m^20
Combination Arm: Pevonedistat 10 mg/m^2+ Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2100
Combination Arm: Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2+ Azacitidine 75 mg/m^20

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values

(NCT02782468)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Cycle 19 (up to Day 399) in single agent arms (Cycle=21days) and Cycle 65 (up to Day 1820) in combination arms (Cycle=28 days)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Single Agent Arm: Pevonedistat 25 mg/m^20
Single Agent Arm: Pevonedistat 44 mg/m^20
Combination Arm: Pevonedistat 10 mg/m^2+ Azacitidine 75 mg/m^20
Combination Arm: Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2+ Azacitidine 75 mg/m^20

[back to top]

Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Pevonedistat When Administered Alone and in Combination With Azacitidine on Cycle 1 Day 5

(NCT02782468)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 5: pre-infusion and at multiple time points (up to 48 hours) post-infusion (Cycle length = 21 days [single agent arms]; 28 days [combination arms])

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Single Agent Arm: Pevonedistat 25 mg/m^2252
Single Agent Arm: Pevonedistat 44 mg/m^2453
Combination Arm: Pevonedistat 10 mg/m^2+ Azacitidine 75 mg/m^276.1
Combination Arm: Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2+ Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2170

[back to top]

Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Pevonedistat When Administered Alone and in Combination With Azacitidine on Cycle 1 Day 1

(NCT02782468)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1: pre-infusion and at multiple time points (up to 48 hours) post-infusion (Cycle length = 21 days [single agent arms]; 28 days [combination arms])

Interventionnanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Single Agent Arm: Pevonedistat 25 mg/m^2253
Single Agent Arm: Pevonedistat 44 mg/m^2410
Combination Arm: Pevonedistat 10 mg/m^2+ Azacitidine 75 mg/m^267.0
Combination Arm: Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2+ Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2160

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

(NCT02782468)
Timeframe: From first dose through 30 days after the last dose of study drug: single agent arms (up to Cycle 19 [up to Day 429]) (Cycle=21 days); combination arms (up to Cycle 65 [up to Day 1850]) (Cycle=28 days)

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TEAEsSAEs
Combination Arm: Pevonedistat 10 mg/m^2+ Azacitidine 75 mg/m^233
Combination Arm: Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2+ Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2106
Single Agent Arm: Pevonedistat 25 mg/m^232
Single Agent Arm: Pevonedistat 44 mg/m^277

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 4.03 During Cycle 1

DLT: Any of following events considered possibly related to study drug(s) by investigator: Grade (G) 3 or greater nausea and/or emesis despite use of optimal antiemetic prophylaxis; G3 diarrhea occurred despite maximal supportive therapy; G3 arthralgia/myalgia despite use of optimal analgesia; G3 nonhematologic toxicity with exceptions: 1) Brief fatigue, 2) hypophosphatemia; Persistent elevations of transaminases/bilirubin above G2 beyond 2 days between doses; Other study drug-related nonhematologic toxicities G2 or greater, required a dose reduction/discontinuation of pevonedistat. G3 or greater hematologic toxicities, including G3 or 4 febrile neutropenia, considered DLTs if: A delay in initiation of Cycle 2 due to lack of adequate recovery from treatment-related toxicity: 1) Of more than (>) 4 weeks due to hematologic toxicity believed not related to leukemic infiltration. Bone marrow (BM) evaluation may have been required. 2) Of >2 weeks due to nonhematologic toxicities. (NCT02782468)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (Cycle length = 21 days [single agent arms]; 28 days [combination arms])

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Single Agent Arm: Pevonedistat 25 mg/m^20
Single Agent Arm: Pevonedistat 44 mg/m^20
Combination Arm: Pevonedistat 10 mg/m^2+ Azacitidine 75 mg/m^20
Combination Arm: Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2+ Azacitidine 75 mg/m^21

[back to top]

Mortality Rates at Day 30 and Day 60

30- and 60-day survival from date of randomization. Estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02785900)
Timeframe: Up to 60 days

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
30-day Mortality Rate60-day Mortality Rate
33A + HMA1123
Placebo + HMA613

[back to top]

Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Negative Composite Complete Remission Rate

Number of patients who achieve both remission (CR or CRi) and MRD-negative status (NCT02785900)
Timeframe: Up to 1.5 years

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
MRD-negative CRc rateMRD-negative CR rateMRD-negative CRi rate
33A + HMA18810
Placebo + HMA1055

[back to top]

Time to Complete Remission

Time to CR or CRi is the time from randomization to the first documentation of CR/CRi (NCT02785900)
Timeframe: Up to 1.5 years

Interventionweeks (Median)
33A + HMA9.3
Placebo + HMA9.4

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Time from randomization to death due to any cause (NCT02785900)
Timeframe: Up to 1.5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
33A + HMA5.1
Placebo + HMANA

[back to top]

Leukemia-free Survival

Leukemia-free survival is calculated from the first documentation of blast clearance (CR, CRi, mLFS) to the first documentation of disease relapse or death, whichever comes first. Patients who are in remission at the time of analysis cutoff are censored at the date of last response assessment. Patients who started another anticancer therapy before relapse or death are censored at the date of last response assessment prior to start of new therapy. (NCT02785900)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9.49 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
33A + HMA5.1
Placebo + HMA7.5

[back to top]

Event-free Survival

Event-free survival is calculated from the time of randomization to the first documentation of progression, relapse, or death, whichever comes first. Patients who do not have event (progression, relapse, or death) prior to analysis cutoff date are censored at the date of last response assessment. Patients who started another anticancer therapy before progression, relapse, or death are censored at the date of last response assessment prior to the start of new therapy. Patients who do not have response assessment post-baseline are censored at the date of randomization. (NCT02785900)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 11.24 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
33A + HMA4.2
Placebo + HMA6.7

[back to top]

Duration of Remission

Duration of remission is calculated from the first documentation of CR or CRi to the first documentation of disease relapse or death, whichever comes first. Patients who are in remission at the time of analysis cutoff are censored at the date of last response assessment. Patients who started another anticancer therapy before relapse or death are censored at the date of last response assessment prior to start of new therapy. (NCT02785900)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9.5 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
33A + HMA5.1
Placebo + HMA7.5

[back to top]

Composite Complete Remission (CRc) Rate

Number of patients who achieved complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) according to the modified response criteria for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) per Cheson 2003. (NCT02785900)
Timeframe: Up to 1.5 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
33A + HMA30
Placebo + HMA26

[back to top]

Incidence of Grade 3 or Higher Laboratory Abnormalities

Participants who experienced a laboratory grade increase to Grade 3 or higher (per National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [NCI CTCAE], v4.03) (NCT02785900)
Timeframe: Up to 1.5 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Alanine Aminotransferase (IU/L) - HighAlbumin (g/dL) - LowAlkaline Phosphatase (IU/L) - HighAmylase (IU/L) - HighAspartate Aminotransferase (IU/L) - HighBilirubin (mg/dL) - HighCalcium (mg/dL) - LowCreatinine (mg/dL) - HighGlucose (mg/dL) - HighMagnesium (mg/dL) - HighPhosphate (mg/dL) - LowPotassium (mEq/L) - HighPotassium (mEq/L) - LowSodium (mEq/L) - LowTriacylglycerol Lipase (IU/L) - HighUrate (mg/dL) - HighHemoglobin (g/dL) - LowLeukocytes (x10^3/uL) - HighLeukocytes (x10^3/uL) - LowLymphocytes (x10^3/uL) - HighLymphocytes (x10^3/uL) - LowNeutrophils (x10^3/uL) - LowPlatelets (x10^3/uL) - Low
33A + HMA02011180122171513104590861516377
Placebo + HMA242021319090141247663704294375

[back to top]

Type, Incidence, Severity, Seriousness, and Relatedness of Adverse Events

"Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are presented and defined as newly occurring (not present at baseline) or worsening after first dose of investigational product. SAE = serious adverse event. Study treatment in this data set refers to blinded study treatment." (NCT02785900)
Timeframe: Up to 1.5 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Patient with any TEAEPatients with any AE related to study treatmentPatients with any SAEPatients with any SAE related to study treatmentPatients with Grade 3 or Higher AE
33A + HMA111839251103
Placebo + HMA125598920112

[back to top]

Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 1 Prior to First Course of Azacitidine

Will calculate the percentage of CpG site methylation for all patients before the first course of azacitidine. Mean and standard deviation will be reported. (NCT02828358)
Timeframe: Week 6, Day 1 (Following the induction phase (35 days), the first course of Azacitidine began around Week 6 of therapy)

InterventionPercentage of CpG methylation (Mean)
KMT2A-Rearranged78.17

[back to top]

Tolerability of Azacitidine in Combination With Interfant-06 Standard Chemotherapy in Evaluable Infant Patients With Newly Diagnosed ALL With KMT2A Gene Rearrangement (KMT2A-R). KMT2A Gene Rearrangement (KMT2A-R)

Proportion of KMT2A-Rearranged patients treated with azacitidine with Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) from the first course of azacitidine administration up to fourth course of azacitidine administration. (NCT02828358)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
KMT2A-Rearranged6.45

[back to top]

Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 5 of Second Course of Azacitidine

Will calculate the percentage of CpG site methylation for all patients after the second course of azacitidine. Mean and standard deviation will be reported. (NCT02828358)
Timeframe: Week 13, Day 5 (Following induction phase (5 weeks), the first course of Azacitidine (1 week), and consolidation (6 weeks), the second course of Azacitidine began around Week 13 of therapy)

InterventionPercentage of CpG methylation (Mean)
KMT2A-Rearranged74.52

[back to top]

Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 5 of First Course of Azacitidine

Will calculate the percentage of CpG site methylation for all patients after the first course of azacitidine. Mean and standard deviation will be reported. (NCT02828358)
Timeframe: Week 6, Day 5 (Following the induction phase (35 days), the first course of Azacitidine began around Week 6 of therapy)

InterventionPercentage of CpG methylation (Mean)
KMT2A-Rearranged75.54

[back to top]

Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 1 Prior to Second Course of Azacitidine

Will calculate the percentage of CpG site methylation for all patients before the second course of azacitidine. Mean and standard deviation will be reported. (NCT02828358)
Timeframe: Week 13, Day 1 (Following induction phase (5 weeks), the first course of Azacitidine (1 week), and consolidation (6 weeks), the second course of Azacitidine began around Week 13 of therapy)

InterventionPercentage of CpG methylation (Mean)
KMT2A-Rearranged76.5

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)

"CBR is defined as the number of patients who's best response is complete response, plus those with partial response plus those with stable disease as evaluated using imagining scans and assessed by RECIST 1.1 and received at least 6 cycles of treatment.~Complete Response - Disappearance of all lesions Partial Response - At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.~Stable Disease - Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for partial response nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters while on study" (NCT02901899)
Timeframe: Assessed from start of treatment and during treatment for up to 38 cycles where 1 cycle equals 21 days (maximum number of cycles that any patient attempted)

Interventionpatients (Number)
Treatment (Guadecitabine, Pembrolizumab)9

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) Using RECIST 1.1

"Objective response rate (ORR) is defined as the number of patients who's best response is complete response plus those with partial response. Imaging scans will be assessed using RECIST 1.1 to measure ORR to guadecitabine and pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent platinum resistant Ovarian Cancer.~In general the following definitions apply Complete Response - Disappearance of all lesions Partial Response - At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters." (NCT02901899)
Timeframe: Assessed from start of treatment and during treatment for up to 38 cycles where 1 cycle equals 21 days (maximum number of cycles that any patient attempted)

Interventionpatients (Number)
Treatment (Guadecitabine, Pembrolizumab)3

[back to top]

Incidence of Adverse Events

Assess the toxicity of guadecitabine and pembrolizumab by measuring the number, type, grade, severity, and frequency of adverse events according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria Adverse events (AE) (CTCAE) v 4.03. Those that were determined to be at least possibly related to study drugs are reported per drug (guadecitabine and pembrolizumab). Number of related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) is also reported (NCT02901899)
Timeframe: Assessed from start of treatment and during treatment for up to 38 cycles and up to 90 days post last dose where 1 cycle equals 21 days (maximum number of cycles that any patient attempted)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Related to Guadecitabine : All AEsRelated to Guadecitabine : AEs graded 1-2Related to Guadecitabine : AEs graded 3-4Related to Guadecitabine : SAEsRelated to Pembrolizumab : All AEsRelated to Pembrolizumab : AEs graded 1-2Related to Pembrolizumab : AEs graded 3-4Related to Pembrolizumab : SAEs
Treatment (Guadecitabine, Pembrolizumab)4140233333296

[back to top]

Part 1: Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate at Indicated Time-points

Vital signs including respiratory rate was measured after resting for at least 5 minutes in a semi-supine position. Baseline was defined as the value obtained prior to first dosing (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from Baseline value. (NCT02929498)
Timeframe: Baseline and Cycle 1 (Days 7, 15), Cycle 2 (Day 1), Cycle 3 (Day 1), Cycle 4 (Day 1), Cycle 5 (Day 1) (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionBreaths per minute (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 7, n=5Cycle 1, Day 15, n=4Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1
Part 1: GSK2879552-0.4-0.5-1.0-0.3-0.5-1.0

[back to top]

Part 1: Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Indicated Time-points

Vital signs including SBP and DBP were measured after resting for at least 5 minutes in a semi-supine position. Baseline was defined as the value obtained prior to first dosing (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from Baseline value. (NCT02929498)
Timeframe: Baseline and Cycle 1 (Days 7, 15), Cycle 2 (Day 1), Cycle 3 (Day 1), Cycle 4 (Day 1), Cycle 5 (Day 1) (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionMillimeters of mercury (Mean)
SBP, Cycle 1, Day 7, n=5SBP, Cycle 1, Day 15, n=4SBP, Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3SBP, Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3SBP, Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2SBP, Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1DBP, Cycle 1, Day 7, n=5DBP, Cycle 1, Day 15, n=4DBP, Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3DBP, Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3DBP, Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2DBP, Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1
Part 1: GSK2879552-10.2-13.5-4.7-3.7-5.0-6.0-2.6-3.5-7.32.73.0-4.0

[back to top]

Part 1: Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin, Creatinine and Urate at Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected from participants for evaluation of clinical chemistry parameters including Total Bilirubin, Direct Bilirubin, Creatinine and urate. Baseline was defined as the value obtained prior to first dosing (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from Baseline value. (NCT02929498)
Timeframe: Baseline and Cycle 1(Days 1, 7, 15, 22), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 7, 15 ,22), Cycle 3 (Day 1), Cycle 4 (Day 1), Cycle 5 (Day 1) (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionMicromoles per liter (umol/L) (Mean)
Total Bilirubin, Cycle 1, Day 1, n=4Total Bilirubin Cycle 1, Day 7, n=5Total Bilirubin Cycle 1, Day 15, n=4Total Bilirubin Cycle 1, Day 22, n=3Total Bilirubin Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3Total Bilirubin Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3Total Bilirubin Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2Total Bilirubin, Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1Direct Bilirubin, Cycle 1, Day 1, n=1Creatinine, Cycle 1, Day 1, n=4Creatinine Cycle 1, Day 7, n=5Creatinine Cycle 1, Day 15, n=4Creatinine Cycle 1, Day 22, n=3Creatinine Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3Creatinine Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3Creatinine Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2Creatinine, Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1Urate, Cycle 1, Day 1, n=1Urate Cycle 1, Day 7, n=2Urate Cycle 1, Day 22, n=1Urate Cycle 2, Day 1, n=1Urate Cycle 3, Day 1, n=1Urate Cycle 4, Day 1, n=1
Part 1: GSK2879552-3.420-1.0940.128-1.710-2.8500.000-0.855-3.4201.36816.1334.06617.23823.27916.50115.91232.7084.42041.6365.94835.68865.42889.22059.480

[back to top]

Part 1: Number of Participants With Any Non-serious Adverse Event (Non-SAE), Serious AE (SAE), Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT), Dose Reductions or Delays and Withdrawals Due to Toxicities

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment that may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization but may jeopardize the participant or may require medical or surgical intervention or event associated with liver injury and impaired liver function were categorized as SAE. An event was considered a DLT if it occurred within the first 28 days of treatment, and met the DLT criteria unless it could be clearly established that the event was unrelated to treatment. (NCT02929498)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Non-SAEsSAEsDLTDose reductions or delaysWithdrawals due to toxicities
Part 1: GSK287955251000

[back to top]

Part 1: Change From Baseline in Body Temperature at Indicated Time-points

Vital signs including body temperature was measured after resting for at least 5 minutes in a semi-supine position. Baseline was defined as the value obtained prior to first dosing (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from Baseline value. (NCT02929498)
Timeframe: Baseline and Cycle 1 (Days 7, 15), Cycle 2 (Day 1), Cycle 3 (Day 1), Cycle 4 (Day 1), Cycle 5 (Day 1) (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionCelsius (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 7, n=5Cycle 1, Day 15, n=4Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1
Part 1: GSK28795520.140.100.270.200.10-0.20

[back to top]

Part 1: Plasma Concentration of GSK2879552

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points to evaluate concentration of GSK2879552. Each Pharmacokinetic (PK) sample was collected as close as possible to the planned time relative to the dose (i.e., time zero) administered to the participant on PK days. PK Concentration Population consisted of all participants in the All Treated Subject Population for whom a blood sample for pharmacokinetics was obtained and analyzed. (NCT02929498)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 1: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 3 hour; pre-dose on Days 2,4; Day 7: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 3 hour; Day 15: pre-dose, 0.5-1 hour post-dose; pre-dose on Day 22; Cycle 2: pre-dose on Days 1, 7, 15, 22; Pre-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 3,4,5 (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionNanograms per milliliter (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 1, pre-dose, n=5Cycle 1, Day 1, 0.5 hour, n=4Cycle 1, Day 1, 1 hour, n=5Cycle 1, Day 1, 3 hour, n=5Cycle 1, Day 2, pre-dose, n=5Cycle 1, Day 4, pre-dose, n=5Cycle 1, Day 7, pre-dose, n=5Cycle 1, Day 7, 0.5 hour, n=5Cycle 1, Day 7, 1 hour, n=5Cycle 1, Day 7, 3 hour, n=5Cycle 1, Day 15, pre-dose, n=3Cycle 1, Day 15, 0.5-1 hour, n=3Cycle 1, Day 22, pre-dose, n=3Cycle 2, Day 1, pre-dose, n=3Cycle 2, Day 7, pre-dose, n=3Cycle 2, Day 15, pre-dose, n=3Cycle 2, Day 22, pre-dose, n=3Cycle 3, Day 1, pre-dose, n=3Cycle 4, Day 1, pre-dose, n=2Cycle 5, Day 1, pre-dose, n=1
Part 1: GSK28795520.0011.798.186.401.031.871.979.589.178.582.0013.391.892.161.812.332.111.991.631.97

[back to top]

Part 1: Change From Baseline in Blast/Leukocytes at Indicated Time-points

Blood samples were collected from participants for evaluation of hematology parameters including blast/leukocytes. Baseline was defined as the value obtained prior to first dosing (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from Baseline value. (NCT02929498)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Cycle of 28 days)

InterventionRatio of blasts to leukocytes (Mean)
Part 1: GSK28795520.000

[back to top]

Part 1: Change From Baseline in Partial Pressure Carbon Dioxide (pCO2) at Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected from participants for evaluation of clinical chemistry parameters including pCO2. Baseline was defined as the value obtained prior to first dosing (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from Baseline value. (NCT02929498)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 1 of Cycle 1 (cycle of 28 days)

InterventionKilopascal (Mean)
Part 1: GSK28795520.173

[back to top]

Part 1: Overall Survival

Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from first treatment dose until death due to any reason. For the analysis of overall survival (OS), the last date of known contact was used for those participants who had not died at the time of analysis; such participants were considered censored. (NCT02929498)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Part 1: GSK287955222.4

[back to top]

Part 1: Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) at Indicated Time-points

Blood samples were collected from participants for evaluation of hematology parameters including MCV. Baseline was defined as the value obtained prior to first dosing (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from Baseline value. (NCT02929498)
Timeframe: Baseline and Cycle 1(Days 1, 7, 15, 22), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 7, 15 ,22), Cycle 3 (Day 1), Cycle 4 (Day 1), Cycle 5 (Day 1) (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionFemtoliter (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 1, n=5Cycle 1, Day 7, n=4Cycle 1, Day 15, n=3Cycle 1, Day 22, n=3Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3Cycle 2, Day 7, n=3Cycle 2, Day 15, n=3Cycle 2, Day 22, n=3Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1
Part 1: GSK2879552-0.280-0.400-0.2670.4001.6673.5002.9332.9002.7006.7508.500

[back to top]

Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Investigator-assessed Best Response Assessed by Objective Response Rate (ORR)

Objective Response Rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved Complete Remission (CR) or Partial Remission (PR) or Marrow Complete Remission (mCR) or confirmed Hematologic Improvement (HI) prior to new anti-cancer therapy on the All Treated Subjects Population. Participants with Not Evaluable or missing response were treated as non-responders. International Working Group (IWG) criteria, 2006 was used to evaluate response. (NCT02929498)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Part 1: GSK287955220

[back to top]

Part 1: Progression-free Survival

Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from first treatment dose until the first documented sign of disease progression or death. If the participant missed more than one visit prior to the date of documented events, PFS was censored at the last adequate assessment prior to missing. Otherwise, if the participant did not have a documented date of events, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate assessment. (NCT02929498)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Part 1: GSK287955222.4

[back to top]

Part 1: Change From Baseline in Erythrocytes at Indicated Time-points

Blood samples were collected from participants for evaluation of hematology parameters including erythrocytes. Baseline was defined as the value obtained prior to first dosing (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from Baseline value. (NCT02929498)
Timeframe: Baseline and Cycle 1(Days 1, 7, 15, 22), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 7, 15 ,22), Cycle 3 (Day 1), Cycle 4 (Day 1), Cycle 5 (Day 1) (each cycle of 28 days)

Intervention10^12 cells per Liter (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 1, n=5Cycle 1, Day 7, n=5Cycle 1, Day 15, n=4Cycle 1, Day 22, n=3Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3Cycle 2, Day 7, n=3Cycle 2, Day 15, n=3Cycle 2, Day 22, n=3Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1
Part 1: GSK28795520.030-0.058-0.1380.077-0.193-0.017-0.063-0.173-0.1600.0600.000

[back to top]

Part 1: Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Indicated Time-points

Vital signs including heart rate was measured after resting for at least 5 minutes in a semi-supine position. Baseline was defined as the value obtained prior to first dosing (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from Baseline value. (NCT02929498)
Timeframe: Baseline and Cycle 1 (Days 7, 15), Cycle 2 (Day 1), Cycle 3 (Day 1), Cycle 4 (Day 1), Cycle 5 (Day 1) (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 7, n=5Cycle 1, Day 15, n=4Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1
Part 1: GSK28795524.8-2.5-6.3-1.0-2.0-1.0

[back to top]

Part 1: Change From Baseline in Hematocrit at Indicated Time-points

Blood samples were collected from participants for evaluation of hematology parameters including Hematocrit. Baseline was defined as the value obtained prior to first dosing (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from Baseline value. (NCT02929498)
Timeframe: Baseline and Cycle 1(Days 1, 7, 15, 22), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 7, 15 ,22), Cycle 3 (Day 1), Cycle 4 (Day 1), Cycle 5 (Day 1) (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionProportion of red blood cells in blood (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 1, n=5Cycle 1, Day 7, n=5Cycle 1, Day 15, n=4Cycle 1, Day 22, n=3Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3Cycle 2, Day 7, n=3Cycle 2, Day 15, n=3Cycle 2, Day 22, n=3Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1
Part 1: GSK28795520.001-0.008-0.0180.007-0.0140.0070.002-0.009-0.0080.0240.023

[back to top]

Part 1: Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (MCH) at Indicated Time-points

Blood samples were collected from participants for evaluation of hematology parameters including MCH. Baseline was defined as the value obtained prior to first dosing (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from Baseline value. (NCT02929498)
Timeframe: Baseline and Cycle 1(Days 1, 7, 15, 22), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 7, 15 ,22), Cycle 3 (Day 1), Cycle 4 (Day 1), Cycle 5 (Day 1) (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionPicogram (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 1, n=5Cycle 1, Day 7, n=4Cycle 1, Day 15, n=3Cycle 1, Day 22, n=3Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3Cycle 2, Day 7, n=3Cycle 2, Day 15, n=3Cycle 2, Day 22, n=3Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1
Part 1: GSK2879552-1.100-1.350-0.1000.0670.8331.0670.9000.7670.9331.9502.200

[back to top]

Part 1: Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Mean Heart Rate at Indicated Time-points

Single 12-lead ECG was obtained at designated time points during the study using an ECG machine that automatically calculates the heart rate and measures PR, QRS, QT, and corrected QT (QTc) intervals. Baseline was defined as the value obtained prior to first dosing (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from Baseline value. (NCT02929498)
Timeframe: Baseline and Cycle 1 (Days 1, 7), Cycle 2 (Day 1), Cycle 3 (Day 1), Cycle 4 (Day 1), Cycle 5 (Day 1) (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 1, n=2Cycle 1, Day 7, n=5Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1
Part 1: GSK28795522.0-1.0-5.32.3-3.0-7.0

[back to top]

Part 1: Proportion of Participants With Disease Progression to Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia (AML)

The proportion of participants with disease progression to AML is defined as the percentage of participants experiencing AML on the All Treated Subjects Population. (NCT02929498)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Part 1: GSK287955240

[back to top]

Part 1: Time to AML Progression

Time to AML progression is defined as the time from first treatment dose until AML progression or crossover if using the All Treated Subjects Population. For the analysis of time to AML, if the participant did not experience AML, time to AML was censored at the last treatment prior to the initiation of anti-cancer therapy or crossover. (NCT02929498)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Part 1: GSK287955222.4

[back to top]

Part 1: Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) and Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT) at Indicated Time-points

Blood samples were collected from participants for evaluation of clinical chemistry parameters including ALT, ALP, AST, LDH and GGT. Baseline was defined as the value obtained prior to first dosing (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from Baseline value. (NCT02929498)
Timeframe: Baseline and Cycle 1(Days 1, 7, 15, 22), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 7, 15 ,22), Cycle 3 (Day 1), Cycle 4 (Day 1), Cycle 5 (Day 1) (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionInternational unit per liter (IU/L) (Mean)
ALT, Cycle 1, Day 1, n=4ALT Cycle 1, Day 7, n=5ALT Cycle 1, Day 15, n=4ALT Cycle 1, Day 22, n=3ALT Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3ALT Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3ALT Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2ALT Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1ALP, Cycle 1, Day 1, n=4ALP Cycle 1, Day 7, n=5ALP Cycle 1, Day 15, n=4ALP Cycle 1, Day 22, n=3ALP Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3ALP Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3ALP Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2ALP Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1AST, Cycle 1, Day 1, n=4AST Cycle 1, Day 7, n=5AST Cycle 1, Day 15, n=4AST Cycle 1, Day 22, n=3AST Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3AST Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3AST Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2AST Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1LDH, Cycle 1, Day 1, n=4LDH Cycle 1, Day 7, n=5LDH Cycle 1, Day 15, n=3LDH Cycle 1, Day 22, n=3LDH Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3LDH Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3LDH Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2LDH Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1GGT, Cycle 1, Day 1, n=1GGT Cycle 1, Day 7, n=2GGT Cycle 1, Day 22, n=1GGT Cycle 2, Day 1, n=1GGT Cycle 3, Day 1, n=1GGT Cycle 4, Day 1, n=1
Part 1: GSK2879552-10.000-3.000-6.2501.3333.0003.33333.0003.000-4.750-6.800-4.2508.00023.66715.66718.50021.000-6.750-3.200-3.2503.000-0.333-3.66722.00016.0004.000-31.2004.000-12.000-18.333-20.66712.50011.000-17.000-7.5000.0003.0008.0005.000

[back to top]

Part 1: Change From Baseline in Albumin and Protein at Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected from participants for evaluation of clinical chemistry parameters including Albumin and Protein. Baseline was defined as the value obtained prior to first dosing (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from Baseline value. (NCT02929498)
Timeframe: Baseline and Cycle 1(Days 1, 7, 15, 22), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 7, 15 ,22), Cycle 3 (Day 1), Cycle 4 (Day 1), Cycle 5 (Day 1) (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionG/L (Mean)
Albumin, Cycle 1, Day 1, n=4Albumin Cycle 1, Day 7, n=4Albumin Cycle 1, Day 15, n=3Albumin Cycle 1, Day 22, n=3Albumin Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3Albumin Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3Albumin Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2Albumin Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1Protein, Cycle 1, Day 1, n=4Protein Cycle 1, Day 7, n=5Protein Cycle 1, Day 15, n=4Protein Cycle 1, Day 22, n=3Protein Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3Protein Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3Protein Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2Protein Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1
Part 1: GSK2879552-1.250-1.250-1.667-1.333-1.667-6.0000.0001.000-3.250-3.200-1.500-1.667-3.333-7.333-2.0000.000

[back to top]

Part 1: Change From Baseline in Calcium, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Sodium, Phosphate and Urea Nitrogen at Indicated Time-points

Blood samples were collected from participants for evaluation of clinical chemistry parameters including calcium, chloride, glucose, potassium, sodium, phosphate and urea nitrogen. Baseline was defined as the value obtained prior to first dosing (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from Baseline value. (NCT02929498)
Timeframe: Baseline and Cycle 1(Days 1, 7, 15, 22), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 7, 15 ,22), Cycle 3 (Day 1), Cycle 4 (Day 1), Cycle 5 (Day 1) (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionMillimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Mean)
Calcium, Cycle 1, Day 1, n=3Calcium Cycle 1, Day 7, n=4Calcium Cycle 1, Day 15, n=3Calcium Cycle 1, Day 22, n=3Calcium Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3Calcium Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3Calcium Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2Calcium, Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1Chloride, Cycle 1, Day 1, n=4Chloride Cycle 1, Day 7, n=5Chloride Cycle 1, Day 15, n=4Chloride Cycle 1, Day 22, n=3Chloride Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3Chloride Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3Chloride Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2Chloride, Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1Glucose, Cycle 1, Day 1, n=4Glucose Cycle 1, Day 7, n=5Glucose Cycle 1, Day 15, n=4Glucose Cycle 1, Day 22, n=3Glucose Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3Glucose Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3Glucose Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2Glucose, Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1Potassium, Cycle 1, Day 1, n=4Potassium Cycle 1, Day 7, n=5Potassium Cycle 1, Day 15, n=4Potassium Cycle 1, Day 22, n=3Potassium Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3Potassium Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3Potassium Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2Potassium, Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1Sodium, Cycle 1, Day 1, n=4Sodium Cycle 1, Day 7, n=5Sodium Cycle 1, Day 15, n=4Sodium Cycle 1, Day 22, n=3Sodium Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3Sodium Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3Sodium Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2Sodium, Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1Urea nitrogen, Cycle 1, Day 1, n=3Urea nitrogen Cycle 1, Day 7, n=4Urea nitrogen Cycle 1, Day 15, n=3Urea nitrogen Cycle 1, Day 22, n=3Urea nitrogen Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3Urea nitrogen Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3Urea nitrogen Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2Urea nitrogen, Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1Phosphate, Cycle 1, Day 1, n=1Phosphate Cycle 1, Day 7, n=2Phosphate Cycle 1, Day 22, n=1Phosphate Cycle 2, Day 1, n=1Phosphate Cycle 3, Day 1, n=1Phosphate Cycle 4, Day 1, n=1
Part 1: GSK2879552-0.008-0.075-0.066-0.033-0.067-0.183-0.050-0.050-0.7500.6000.2500.3330.333-0.3330.0000.0000.527-0.3330.0140.8701.9241.6281.0271.1100.3250.000-0.0250.0670.067-0.3670.0500.500-1.750-1.000-2.000-0.6670.333-1.000-0.5000.0002.7011.2141.5471.3090.238-1.190-0.535-1.4280.194-0.081-0.0320.1940.0000.032

[back to top]

Part 1: Change From Baseline in ECG PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTc Corrected by Bazett's Formula (QTcB) and QTc Corrected by Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) at Indicated Time-points

Single 12-lead ECG was obtained at designated time points during the study using an ECG machine that automatically calculates the heart rate and measures PR, QRS, QT, and QTc intervals. Baseline was defined as the value obtained prior to first dosing (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from Baseline value. (NCT02929498)
Timeframe: Baseline and Cycle 1 (Days 1,7), Cycle 2 (Day 1), Cycle 3 (Day 1), Cycle 4 (Day 1), Cycle 5 (Day 1) (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionMilliseconds (Mean)
PR interval, Cycle 1, Day 1, n=2PR interval, Cycle 1, Day 7, n=5PR interval, Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3PR interval, Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3PR interval, Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2PR interval, Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1QRS duration, Cycle 1, Day 1, n=2QRS duration, Cycle 1, Day 7, n=5QRS duration, Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3QRS duration, Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3QRS duration, Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2QRS duration, Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1QT interval, Cycle 1, Day 1, n=2QT interval, Cycle 1, Day 7, n=5QT interval, Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3QT interval, Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3QT interval, Cycle 4, Day 1, n=1QT interval, Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1QTcB interval, Cycle 1, Day 1, n=2QTcB interval, Cycle 1, Day 7, n=2QTcF interval, Cycle 1, Day 1, n=2QTcF interval, Cycle 1, Day 7, n=5QTcF interval, Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3QTcF interval, Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3QTcF interval, Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2QTcF interval, Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1
Part 1: GSK28795520.039.86.00.76.012.0-1.0-17.22.03.3-1.0-8.00.0-5.624.72.0-4.014.07.0-35.54.5-9.48.013.0-6.0-8.0

[back to top]

Part 1: Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) and Hemoglobin (Hb) at Indicated Time-points

Blood samples were collected from participants for evaluation of hematology parameters including MCHC and Hb. Baseline was defined as the value obtained prior to first dosing (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from Baseline value. (NCT02929498)
Timeframe: Baseline and Cycle 1(Days 1, 7, 15, 22), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 7, 15 ,22), Cycle 3 (Day 1), Cycle 4 (Day 1), Cycle 5 (Day 1) (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionGrams per liter (Mean)
MCHC, Cycle 1, Day 1, n=5MCHC, Cycle 1, Day 7, n=4MCHC, Cycle 1, Day 15, n=3MCHC, Cycle 1, Day 22, n=3MCHC, Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3MCHC, Cycle 2, Day 7, n=3MCHC, Cycle 2, Day 15, n=3MCHC, Cycle 2, Day 22, n=3MCHC, Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3MCHC, Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2MCHC, Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1Hb, Cycle 1, Day 1, n=5Hb, Cycle 1, Day 7, n=5Hb, Cycle 1, Day 15, n=4Hb, Cycle 1, Day 22, n=3Hb, Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3Hb, Cycle 2, Day 7, n=3Hb, Cycle 2, Day 15, n=3Hb, Cycle 2, Day 22, n=3Hb, Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3Hb, Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2Hb, Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1
Part 1: GSK2879552-10.400-12.5000.3330.0003.667-1.0000.000-2.0001.333-3.500-8.000-2.000-4.200-5.0002.000-3.6672.0000.333-3.000-2.3337.0006.000

[back to top]

Part 1: Number of Participants With Documented Platelet and Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions Per Month

Number of participants with documented platelet and RBC transfusions have been presented. (NCT02929498)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Platelets transfusionRBC transfusionRBC concentrated transfusion
Part 1: GSK2879552541

[back to top]

Part 1: Change From Baseline in Percent Reticulocytes at Indicated Time-points

Blood samples were collected from participants for evaluation of hematology parameters including percent reticulocytes. Baseline was defined as the value obtained prior to first dosing (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from Baseline value. (NCT02929498)
Timeframe: Baseline and Cycle 1(Days 1, 7, 15, 22), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 7, 15 ,22), Cycle 3 (Day 1), Cycle 4 (Day 1) (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionPercentage of reticulocytes (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 7Cycle 1, Day 22Cycle 2, Day 1Cycle 2, Day 7Cycle 2, Day 15Cycle 3, Day 1Cycle 4, Day 1
Part 1: GSK28795520.000-0.100-0.1000.0000.000-0.100-0.100

[back to top]

Part 1: Change From Baseline in Platelets, Neutrophils, Monocytes, Lymphocytes, Leucocyte, Eosinophils and Basophils at Indicated Time-points

Blood samples were collected from participants for evaluation of hematology parameters including platelets, neutrophils, monocytes, lymphocytes, leucocyte, eosinophils and basophils. Baseline was defined as the value obtained prior to first dosing (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting post-dose value from Baseline value. (NCT02929498)
Timeframe: Baseline and Cycle 1(Days 1, 7, 15, 22), Cycle 2 (Days 1, 7, 15 ,22), Cycle 3 (Day 1), Cycle 4 (Day 1), Cycle 5 (Day 1) (each cycle of 28 days)

Intervention10^9 cells per liter (Mean)
Platelets, Cycle 1, Day 1, n=5Platelets, Cycle 1, Day 7, n=5Platelets, Cycle 1, Day 15, n=4Platelets, Cycle 1, Day 22, n=3Platelets, Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3Platelets, Cycle 2, Day 7, n=3Platelets, Cycle 2, Day 15, n=3Platelets, Cycle 2, Day 22, n=3Platelets, Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3Platelets, Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2Platelets, Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1Neutrophils, Cycle 1, Day 1, n=5Neutrophils, Cycle 1, Day 7, n=5Neutrophils, Cycle 1, Day 15, n=4Neutrophils, Cycle 1, Day 22, n=3Neutrophils, Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3Neutrophils, Cycle 2, Day 7, n=3Neutrophils, Cycle 2, Day 15, n=3Neutrophils, Cycle 2, Day 22, n=3Neutrophils, Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3Neutrophils, Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2Neutrophils, Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1Monocytes, Cycle 1, Day 1, n=5Monocytes, Cycle 1, Day 7, n=5Monocytes, Cycle 1, Day 15, n=4Monocytes, Cycle 1, Day 22, n=3Monocytes, Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3Monocytes, Cycle 2, Day 7, n=3Monocytes, Cycle 2, Day 15, n=3Monocytes, Cycle 2, Day 22, n=3Monocytes, Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3Monocytes, Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2Monocytes, Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1Lymphocytes, Cycle 1, Day 1, n=5Lymphocytes, Cycle 1, Day 7, n=5Lymphocytes, Cycle 1, Day 15, n=4Lymphocytes, Cycle 1, Day 22, n=3Lymphocytes, Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3Lymphocytes, Cycle 2, Day 7, n=3Lymphocytes, Cycle 2, Day 15, n=3Lymphocytes, Cycle 2, Day 22, n=3Lymphocytes, Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3Lymphocytes, Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2Lymphocytes, Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1Leucocytes, Cycle 1, Day 1, n=5Leucocytes, Cycle 1, Day 7, n=5Leucocytes, Cycle 1, Day 15, n=4Leucocytes, Cycle 1, Day 22, n=3Leucocytes, Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3Leucocytes, Cycle 2, Day 7, n=3Leucocytes, Cycle 2, Day 15, n=3Leucocytes, Cycle 2, Day 22, n=3Leucocytes, Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3Leucocytes, Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2Leucocytes, Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1Eosinophils, Cycle 1, Day 1, n=5Eosinophils, Cycle 1, Day 7, n=5Eosinophils, Cycle 1, Day 15, n=4Eosinophils, Cycle 1, Day 22, n=3Eosinophils, Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3Eosinophils, Cycle 2, Day 7, n=3Eosinophils, Cycle 2, Day 15, n=3Eosinophils, Cycle 2, Day 22, n=3Eosinophils, Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3Eosinophils, Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2Eosinophils, Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1Basophils, Cycle 1, Day 1, n=5Basophils, Cycle 1, Day 7, n=5Basophils, Cycle 1, Day 15, n=4Basophils, Cycle 1, Day 22, n=3Basophils, Cycle 2, Day 1, n=3Basophils, Cycle 2, Day 7, n=3Basophils, Cycle 2, Day 15, n=3Basophils, Cycle 2, Day 22, n=3Basophils, Cycle 3, Day 1, n=3Basophils, Cycle 4, Day 1, n=2Basophils, Cycle 5, Day 1, n=1
Part 1: GSK2879552-13.826-17.984-19.250-20.667-16.000-21.333-24.333-24.667-17.000-13.000-11.000-0.0190.0350.0600.1000.2000.3000.3330.2670.2670.6500.8000.0170.0590.10012.6330.2670.4000.6330.2670.3001.0001.600-0.0360.008-0.073-0.033-0.067-0.0330.0330.033-0.0670.2000.400-0.0540.1540.0320.2670.4330.7001.0330.6330.6332.0002.900-0.0000.016-0.0080.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0500.1000.0040.0170.0030.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0500.000

[back to top]

Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Investigator-assessed Best Response Assessed by Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)

Clinical Benefit Rate was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a confirmed Complete Remission (CR) or Partial Remission (PR) or Marrow Complete Remission (mCR) or confirmed Hematologic Improvement (HI) or Stable Disease (SD) prior to new anti-cancer therapy and crossover on the All Treated Subjects Population. Participants with Not Evaluable or missing response were treated as non-responders. International Working Group (IWG) criteria, 2006 was used to evaluate response. (NCT02929498)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Part 1: GSK287955240

[back to top]

Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor and Immune Cells as Assessed by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) at Baseline

Percentage of Tumor and Immune Cells as Assessed by Immunohistochemistry at Baseline. (NCT02951156)
Timeframe: Screening (prior to first dose of study treatment)

,,
InterventionPercentage of cells staining positive (Median)
Tumor Cells (membrane)Immune Cells
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab0.57.5
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab017.5
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab07.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (nAb) Against Utomilumab by Never and Ever Positive Status

nAb never-positive was defined as no positive nAb results at any time point and nAb ever-positive was defined as at least one positive nAb result at any time point. (NCT02951156)
Timeframe: From the date of first study treatment up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
nAb ever-positivenAb never-positive
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab02
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab01

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status

Number of participants with MRD positive, negative and not evaluable status were reported in this outcome measure. (NCT02951156)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycle 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline: PositiveBaseline: NegativeBaseline: NECycle 3 Day 1: PositiveCycle 3 Day 1: NegativeCycle 3 Day 1: NECycle 6 Day 1: PositiveCycle 6 Day 1: NegativeCycle 6 Day 1: NECycle 9 Day 1: PositiveCycle 9 Day 1: NegativeCycle 9 Day 1: NECycle 12 Day 1: PositiveCycle 12 Day 1: NegativeCycle 12 Day 1: NECycle 18 Day 1: PositiveCycle 18 Day 1: NegativeCycle 18 Day 1: NE
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab108101100000000000
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab326131022012012001
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab305302000000000000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT)

AEs occurring in first 4 weeks of treatment,attributable to 1 of study drugs. Hematology:1)Grade 4 neutropenia,2)Grade >=3 febrile neutropenia with single temperature of >38.3 degrees Celsius (C)/sustained temperature of >=38.0 degrees C for more than 1 hour with/without associated sepsis,3)Grade >=3 neutropenic infection,4)Grade 4 thrombocytopenia/Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding,5)Grade 4 anemia 6)Any grade >=3 non-hematology toxicity except:transient Grade 3 flu like symptoms/fever controlled with standard medical management;transient Grade 3 fatigue,localized skin reactions/headache that resolves to Grade <=1;Grade 3 nausea,vomiting/diarrhea resolved to Grade <=1 in ˂72 hours after initiation of adequate medical management;Grade 3 skin toxicity resolved to Grade <=1 in ˂7 days;tumor flare;Single laboratory values that are out of normal range,that have no clinical correlate and resolve to Grade <=1 within 7 days with adequate medical management. (NCT02951156)
Timeframe: Day 1 Cycle 1 up to 4 Weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab1
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab0
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab0

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria

Investigator assessed DOR: was defined for participants with OR as time from first documentation of OR to time of first documentation of disease progression/death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. CR: score of 1(no uptake above background),2(uptake <=mediastinum),or 3(uptake =50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 of largest dominant lymph nodes,no increase in size of other nodes,liver,spleen volume,>=50% decrease in SPD of hepatic splenic nodules,absence of other organ involvement,no new sites of disease. PD: appearance of new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis,at least a 50% increase from nadir in SPD/longest diameter of previous lesion/node. Data was censored on date of last adequate tumor assessment in participants with no event,started new anti-cancer therapy/had 2 or more missing assessments. (NCT02951156)
Timeframe: First response (CR or PR) to date of PD, start of new anti-cancer therapy, discontinuation from the study, censoring date or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 36 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab1.81
Avelumab+Bendamustine+RituximabNA

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03

Laboratory parameters included hematological and biochemistry: Hematological parameters included: anemia, haemoglobin increased, lymphocyte count decreased, lymphocyte count increased, neutrophil count decreased, platelet count decreased and white blood cells decreased. Biochemistry parameters included alanine aminotransferase increased, alkaline phosphatase increased, aspartate aminotransferase increased, blood bilirubin increased, cholesterol high, creatine kinase(cpk) increased, creatinine increased, gamma glutamyl transferase(ggt) increased, hypercalcemia, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypermagnesemia, hypernatremia, hypertriglyceridemia, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hyponatremia, hypophosphatemia, lipase increased,serum amylase increased.Test abnormalities were graded by NCI CTCAE version 4.03 as Grade 1=mild; Grade 2=moderate; Grade 3/Grade 4=severe/life-threatening. Number of participants with abnormalities of any grade were reported. (NCT02951156)
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment up to at least 30 days after the last dose of study treatment or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy (up to 36 months)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AnemiaHemoglobin increasedLymphocyte count decreasedLymphocyte count increasedNeutrophil count decreasedPlatelet count decreasedWhite blood cell decreasedAlanine aminotransferase increasedAlkaline phosphatase increasedAspartate aminotransferase increasedBlood bilirubin increasedCholesterol highCpk increasedCreatinine increasedGGT increasedHypercalcemiaHyperglycemiaHyperkalemiaHypermagnesemiaHypernatremiaHypertriglyceridemiaHypoalbuminemiaHypocalcemiaHypoglycemiaHypokalemiaHypomagnesemiaHyponatremiaHypophosphatemiaLipase increasedSerum amylase increased
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab807023454633164310103400101021
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab10090988263332106222117621443533
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab604024123302263030103310100112

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities

ECG abnormalities included: 1) QT interval, QT interval corrected using Bazett's formula (QTcB) and QT interval corrected using Fridericia's formula (QTcF): increase from baseline greater than (>) 30 millisecond (ms) or 60 ms; absolute value >450 ms, >480 ms and >500 ms; 2) heart rate (HR): absolute value <=50 beats per minute (bpm) and decrease from baseline >=20 bpm; absolute value >=120 bpm and increase from baseline >=20 bpm; 3) PR interval: absolute value >=220 ms and increase from baseline >=20 ms; 4) QRS interval: absolute value >=120 ms. (NCT02951156)
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment up to at least 30 days after the last dose of study treatment or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy (up to 36 months)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
QT: Increase from baseline >30 msQT: Increase from baseline >60 msQT: >450 msQT: >480 msQT: >500 msQTcB: Increase from baseline >30 msQTcB: Increase from baseline >60 msQTcB: >450 msQTcB: >480 msQTcB: >500 msQTcF: Increase from baseline >30 msQTcF: Increase from baseline >60 msQTcF: >450 msQTcF: >480 msQTcF: >500 msHeart rate: <=50 bpm and decrease from baseline >=20 bpmHeart rate: >=120 bpm and increase from baseline >=20 bpmPR: >=220 ms and increase from baseline >=20 msQRS: >=120 ms
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab4321031532323221001
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab4221040941306000102
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab4120011421104000001

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Utomilumab by Never and Ever Positive Status

ADA never-positive was defined as no positive ADA results at any time point. ADA ever-positive was defined as at least one positive ADA result at any time point. (NCT02951156)
Timeframe: From the date of first study treatment up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ADA ever-positiveADA never-positive
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab27
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab17

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Rituximab by Never and Ever Positive Status

ADA never-positive was defined as no positive ADA results at any time point. ADA ever-positive was defined as at least one positive ADA result at any time point. (NCT02951156)
Timeframe: From the date of first study treatment up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ADA ever-positiveADA never-positive
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab011
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab08

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Avelumab by Never and Ever Positive Status

ADA never-positive was defined as no positive ADA results at any time point. ADA ever-positive was defined as at least one positive ADA result at any time point. (NCT02951156)
Timeframe: Baseline: 2 hours pre-dose of first dose of avelumab, Post baseline: post first dose up to up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline: ADA ever-positiveBaseline: ADA never-positivePost Baseline: ADA ever-positivePost Baseline: ADA never-positive
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab0909
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab110011
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab0808

[back to top]

Concentration Verses Time Summary of Avelumab

(NCT02951156)
Timeframe: 1 hour Post dose Day 2 Cycle 1, 144 hour Post dose Day 8 of Cycle 1, 0 hour Post dose Day 16 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycle 4 and Cycle 6

,
Interventionmicrogram per milliliter (mcg/mL) (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2Cycle 1 Day 8Cycle 1 Day 16Cycle 4 Day 1Cycle 6 Day 1
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab198.4368.4426.5362.007.57
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab193.3065.3319.36120.8839.43

[back to top]

Concentration Verses Time Summary of Avelumab

(NCT02951156)
Timeframe: 1 hour Post dose Day 2 Cycle 1, 144 hour Post dose Day 8 of Cycle 1, 0 hour Post dose Day 16 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycle 4 and Cycle 6

Interventionmicrogram per milliliter (mcg/mL) (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2Cycle 1 Day 8Cycle 1 Day 16Cycle 4 Day 1
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab183.2975.1425.3325.00

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate as Assessed by the Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria

Disease control rate was defined as percentage of participants with disease control. Disease Control (DC) was defined as the best overall response of CR, PR, or stable disease (SD). CR: score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake <= mediastinum), or 3 (uptake less than =50% decrease in SPD of up to six of the largest dominant lymph nodes, no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen volume, a >=50% decrease in SPD of hepatic and splenic nodules, absence of other organ involvement, and no new sites of disease. SD: <50% decrease in SDP of up to 6 dominant, measurable nodes and extranodal sites; no criteria for progressive disease met. To qualify as a best overall response of SD, at least one SD assessment must be observed >=6 weeks after start date and before disease progression. (NCT02951156)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the first documentation of PD, study discontinuation, start of new anti-cancer therapy or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 36 months)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab22.2
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab0
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab36.4

[back to top]

Time to Tumor Response (TTR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria

TTR was defined for participants who achieved objective response as time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) that was subsequently confirmed. CR was defined as a score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake <= mediastinum), or 3 (uptake =50% decrease in SPD of up to six of the largest dominant lymph nodes, no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen volume, a >=50% decrease in SPD of hepatic and splenic nodules, absence of other organ involvement, and no new sites of disease. (NCT02951156)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the first documentation of objective response (CR or PR) (maximum up to 36 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab1.8
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab1.9

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria

Investigator assessed PFS was defined as time (in months) from date of randomization to the first documentation of disease progression or death (due to any cause), whichever occurred first. PFS data was censored on the date of the last adequate tumor assessment for participants who had no an event (PD or death), for participants who start a new anti-cancer therapy prior to an event or for participants with an event after 2 or more missing or inadequate post-baseline tumor assessment. Participants without an adequate baseline or post-baseline tumor assessment were censored on the date of randomization unless death occurred on or before the time of the second planned tumor assessment in which case the death was considered as an event. (NCT02951156)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to progression of disease, study discontinuation, censoring date or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 36 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab1.8
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab1.5
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab2.7

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants last known to be alive were censored at date of last contact. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02951156)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to discontinuation from the study or death, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 36 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab14.8
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab4.0
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab5.2

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria

ORR was defined as percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), as assessed by investigator per lugano response classification criteria. CR was defined as a score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake less than or equal to [<=] mediastinum), or 3 (uptake less than [<] mediastinum but <=liver) with or without a residual mass on PET 5-point scale (5-PS), for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions; no evidence of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid disease in bone marrow. PR was defined as >=50% decrease in SPD of up to six of the largest dominant lymph nodes, no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen volume, a >=50% decrease in sum of products of diameters (SPD) of hepatic and splenic nodules, absence of other organ involvement, and no new sites of disease. (NCT02951156)
Timeframe: Randomization until date of PD, start of new anticancer therapy, discontinuation from study or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 36 months)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab11.1
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab0
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab27.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 3, As Per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria For Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03

AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. As per NCI-CTCAE version 4.03,severity was graded as Grade 1:asymptomatic/mild symptoms,clinical/diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2:moderate, minimal, local/noninvasive intervention indicated,limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily life (ADL); Grade 3:severe/medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4:life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5:death related to AE. TEAE was defined as events which occurred during on-treatment period beginning with first dose of study treatment through minimum (30 days + last dose of study treatment or start of new anti-cancer drug therapy). In this outcome measure participant with any TEAE of Grade 3 or above are reported. (NCT02951156)
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment up to at least 30 days after the last dose of study treatment or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy (up to 36 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab4
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab7
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab10

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Distribution of OS will be estimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier. Comparisons of time-to-event endpoints by important subgroups will be made using the log-rank tests. (NCT02953561)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (Azacitidine, Avelumab)4.7

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Distribution of PFS will be estimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier. Comparisons of time-to-event endpoints by important subgroups will be made using the log-rank tests. (NCT02953561)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (Azacitidine, Avelumab)3.2

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival

Time from date of treatment start until the date of first objective documentation of disease-relapse. (NCT02953561)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (Azacitidine, Avelumab)8.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Response

Complete Response (CR) + Partial Remission (PR) + Complete Remission with incomplete recovery (CRi) + Clinical Benefit. CR = normalization of peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) with /= (1.0 x 10^9/L, and a platelet count >/= 100 x 10^9/L). PR = same as CR except presence of 6-15% marrow blasts, or 50% reduction if <15% at start of treatment. CRi meets all criteria for CR except for platelet recovery to >100 x 10^9/L and/or granulocyte count > (1.0 x 10^9/L). MLFS is BM with /= 30 x 10^9/L untransfused (if <20 at pretherapy); or granulocytes increase by 100% and to >0.5 x 10^9/L (if lower than that pre-therapy); or hemoglobin increase by 2 g/dl; or transfusion independent; or splenomegaly reduction by > 50%; or monocytosis reduction by > 50% if pretreatment > 5 x 109/L, or BM or PB Blasts decrease by >/= 50%. (NCT02953561)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Azacitidine, Avelumab)4

[back to top]

Duration of Objective Response Rate (ORR) [Part 1]

"Duration of ORR is the time from first documentation of MLFS, CR, CRc, CRm, PR, CRi or PRi to date of first documentation of disease progression or death due to any cause.~MLFS: BM blasts <5%; absence of blasts with Auer rods and EMD. CR: MLFS criteria; ANC>1000/ul and platelet >100,000/ul; independence from red cell transfusions.~CRc: Reversion to a normal karyotype at the time of CR in cases with an abnormal karyotype at the time of diagnosis; based on the evaluation of 20 metaphase cells from BM.~CRm: Reversion to a molecular-negative phenotype at the time of CR. CRi: All CR criteria except for ANC <1000/ul or platelet <100,000/ul. PR: ANC >1000/ul and platelet >100,000/ul; BM blasts decreased to 5-25% and ≥50% decrease from pre-treatment levels.~PRi: ANC <1000/ul or platelet <100,000/ul; BM blasts decreased to 5-25% and ≥50% decrease from pre-treatment levels.~Disease progression/relapse: BM blast ≥5%; or reappearance of blast in the blood; or development of EMD." (NCT02954653)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionmonths (Median)
Part 1: PF-06747143 0.3 mg/kgNA
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kgNA

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities by Type and Maximum National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (NCI CTCAE) Grade [Part 1]

Chemistry laboratory abnormalities included alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), bilirubin (total), creatinine, hypercalcemia, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypermagnesemia, hypernatremia, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hyponatremia, and hypophosphatemia. Each laboratory parameter was graded per NCI CTCAE version 4.03. (NCT02954653)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ALT72525522ALT72525523Alkaline phosphatase72525522Alkaline phosphatase72525523AST72525522AST72525523Bilirubin (total)72525522Bilirubin (total)72525523Creatinine72525522Creatinine72525523Hypercalcemia72525522Hypercalcemia72525523Hyperglycemia72525522Hyperglycemia72525523Hyperkalemia72525522Hyperkalemia72525523Hypermagnesemia72525522Hypermagnesemia72525523Hypernatremia72525522Hypernatremia72525523Hypoalbuminemia72525522Hypoalbuminemia72525523Hypocalcemia72525522Hypocalcemia72525523Hypoglycemia72525522Hypoglycemia72525523Hypokalemia72525522Hypokalemia72525523Hypomagnesemia72525522Hypomagnesemia72525523Hyponatremia72525522Hyponatremia72525523Hypophosphatemia72525522Hypophosphatemia72525523
Grade 0Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kg4
Part 1: PF-06747143 0.3 mg/kg0
Part 1: PF-06747143 0.3 mg/kg3
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kg1
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kg3
Part 1: PF-06747143 0.3 mg/kg2
Part 1: PF-06747143 0.3 mg/kg1
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kg2
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kg0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities by Type and Maximum National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (NCI CTCAE) Grade [Part 1]

Hematology laboratory abnormalities included anemia, hemoglobin increased, lymphocyte count increased, lymphopenia, neutrophil count decreased, platelet count decreased, and white blood cell (WBC) decreased. Each laboratory parameter was graded per NCI CTCAE version 4.03. (NCT02954653)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Anemia72525522Anemia72525523Hemoglobin increased72525523Hemoglobin increased72525522Lymphocyte count increased72525523Lymphocyte count increased72525522Lymphopenia72525523Lymphopenia72525522Neutrophil count decreased72525523Neutrophil count decreased72525522Platelet count decreased72525523Platelet count decreased72525522WBC decreased72525523WBC decreased72525522
Grade 2Grade 4Grade 0Grade 1Grade 3
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kg3
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kg0
Part 1: PF-06747143 0.3 mg/kg3
Part 1: PF-06747143 0.3 mg/kg0
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kg1
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kg2
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kg4
Part 1: PF-06747143 0.3 mg/kg1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) [Part 1]

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a product or medical device without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or increasing in severity after the first dose of study treatment. AEs included non-serious AEs and SAEs. Causality to study treatment was determined by the investigator. (NCT02954653)
Timeframe: 1 year

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AE (all causality)AE (treatment related)SAE (all causality)SAE (treatment related)
Part 1: PF-06747143 0.3 mg/kg3310
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kg4331

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) by Maximum National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (NCI CTCAE) Grade [Part 1]

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a product or medical device without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or increasing in severity after the first dose of study treatment. AEs were graded by the investigator according to NCI CTCAE version 4.03 (Grade 1: mild AE; Grade 2: moderate AE; Grade 3: severe AE; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE). AEs included non-serious AEs and SAEs. (NCT02954653)
Timeframe: 1 year

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5
Part 1: PF-06747143 0.3 mg/kg01011
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kg00031

[back to top]

Incidence of Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against PF-06747143 [Part 1]

Samples were tested for ADA using a validated assay. Number of participants with positive ADA samples was determined. (NCT02954653)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, end of treatment

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 15Cycle 2 Day 1End of treatment
Part 1: PF-06747143 0.3 mg/kg0000
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kg1000

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival [Part 1]

Progression/relapse free survival is the time from the start of study treatment to first documentation of disease progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurrs first. Disease progression/relapse: Bone marrow blast ≥ 5%; or reappearance of blast in the blood; or development of extramedullary disease (EMD). (NCT02954653)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionmonths (Median)
Part 1: PF-06747143 0.3 mg/kgNA
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kgNA

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Percentage of Participants With Objective Response [Part 1]

"Objective Response was defined as morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS), complete remission (CR), cytogenetic CR (CRc), molecular CR (CRm), partial remission (PR), or CR or PR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi or PRi).~MLFS: Bone marrow (BM) blasts <5%; absence of blasts with Auer rods and extramedullary disease (EMD).~CR: MLFS criteria; absolute neutrophil count (ANC)>1000/ul and platelet >100,000/ul; independence from red cell transfusions.~CRc: Reversion to a normal karyotype at the time of CR in cases with an abnormal karyotype at the time of diagnosis; based on the evaluation of 20 metaphase cells from BM.~CRm: Reversion to a molecular-negative phenotype at the time of CR. CRi: All CR criteria except for ANC <1000/ul or platelet <100,000/ul. PR: ANC >1000/ul and platelet >100,000/ul; BM blasts decreased to 5-25% and ≥50% decrease from pre-treatment levels.~PRi: ANC <1000/ul or platelet <100,000/ul; BM blasts decreased to 5-25% and ≥50% decrease from pre-treatment levels (NCT02954653)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Part 1: PF-06747143 0.3 mg/kgNA
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kgNA

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) [Part 1]

DLTs were classified according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.03 and were defined as any of a predefined set of unacceptable hematologic and non-hematologic adverse events (AEs) occurring in the first treatment cycle unless clearly determined unrelated to PF-06747143. In addition, clinically important or persistent toxicities that were not included in the pre-specified criteria could be considered a DLT following review by the investigators and sponsor. (NCT02954653)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Day 28 of Cycle 1

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Part 1: PF-06747143 0.3 mg/kg0
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kg1

[back to top]

Parts 1 and 2: Progression-free Survival Based on RECIST v1.1.

Defined as the time from date of first dose of study drug until the earliest date of disease progression per RECIST v1.1, or death due to any cause, if occurring sooner than progression. (NCT02959437)
Timeframe: Every 9 weeks from date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause whichever came first, assessed up to 24 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment Group A :100mg of INCB243602.07
Treatment Group A :300mg of INCB243602.64

[back to top]

Part 1 and 2 : Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an event occurring after exposure to at least 1 dose of study drug. A treatment-related AE was defined as an event with a definite, probable, or possible causality to study medication. A serious AE is an event resulting in death, hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or is life threatening, a congenital anomaly/birth defect or requires medical or surgical intervention to prevent 1 of the outcomes above. The intensity of an AE was graded according to the National Cancer Institute common terminology criteria for adverse events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.03: Grade 1 (Mild); Grade 2 (Moderate); Grade 3 (Severe); Grade 4 (life-threatening). (NCT02959437)
Timeframe: Baseline through 42-49 days after end of treatment, estimated up to 27 months (24 months with 100 day FU period).

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment Group A :100mg of INCB2436062
Treatment Group A :300mg of INCB243608

[back to top]

Part 1 and 2: Objective Response Rate Based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants having a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as determined by investigator assessment of radiographic disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. CR is disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. A participant was considered as an objective responder if the participant had a best overall response of CR or PR. (NCT02959437)
Timeframe: Every 9 weeks for the duration of study participation; estimated minimum of 6 months.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment Group A :100mg of INCB243603
Treatment Group A :300mg of INCB243601
Treatment Group B :INCB057643+Pembrolizumab+Epacadostat0
Treatment Group C :INCB059872+Pembrolizumab+Epacadostat0

[back to top]

Parts 1 and 2: Duration of Response Based on RECIST v1.1

Defined as the time from earliest date of disease response until the earliest date of disease progression per RECIST v1.1, or death due to any cause, if occurring sooner than progression. (NCT02959437)
Timeframe: Every 9 weeks from date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause whichever came first, assessed up to 24 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment Group A :100mg of INCB243602.63
Treatment Group A :300mg of INCB243601.22

[back to top]

Parts 1 and 2: Percentage of Responders Determined by Immunohistochemistry

Responder is defined as an increase in the number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes or the ratio of CD8+ lymphocytes to T regulatory cells infiltrating tumor post-treatment versus pretreatment with pembrolizumab and epacadostat in combination with azacitidine. (NCT02959437)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 5/6 or week 8/9

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Intratumoral CD8+ T cellsCD8+:FoxP3+ ratios
Treatment Group A :100 or 300mg of INCB243601410

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as the number of days from the date of randomization to the date of death. Log rank test was used to compare the OS distribution between two treatment arms. Cox regression was used to report the hazard ratio. (NCT02993523)
Timeframe: From the study start up to death or alive or lost to follow-up (up to approximately 4.8 years; data cut off date: 1 December 2021)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Group 2: Placebo + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^29.6
Group 2: Venetoclax 100 mg/200 mg/400 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^214.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR) and Complete Remission With Incomplete Marrow Recovery (CRi)

CR and CRi was calculated based on current International Working Group (IWG) criteria. CR is defined as absolute neutrophil count >10^3/ microliter (mcL), platelets >10^5/mcL, red cell transfusion independence, and bone marrow with <5% blasts. CRi is defined as bone marrow with less than 5% blasts, and absolute neutrophils of ≤10^3/mcL or platelets ≤10^5/mcL. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at the nearest decimal. (NCT02993523)
Timeframe: From the study start up to death (up to approximately 4.8 years; data cut-off date: 1 December 2021)

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CRCRi
Group 2: Placebo + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^217.911.0
Group 2: Venetoclax 100 mg/200 mg/400 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^238.828.0
Open Label China Cohort: Venetoclax 400 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^260.020.0

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS:The length of time from the start of treatment until death by any cause. (NCT03072043)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase 1B Dose Level 114.6
Phase 1B Dose Level 211.6
Phase 1B: Dose Level 3 / Phase 2 MTD10.4

[back to top]

Phase 2: Complete Response (CR) Rate

Complete Response Rate as defined by the 2006 International Working Group (IWG) criteria. (NCT03072043)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Phase 2: Participants in Dose Level 3/MTD53

[back to top]

Phase 2: Duration of Response

Duration of response defined as the time between achieving response and progression of disease. (NCT03072043)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Evaluable Participants8

[back to top]

Phase 2: Overall Response Rate

Proportion of participants achieving hematological improvement (HI), partial response (PR), complete response (CR), and/or marrow CR (mCR) by the IWG 2006 criteria. (NCT03072043)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
All Participants87

[back to top]

Phase 1b: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)

Maximum Tolerated Dose, defined as the dose level below which dose limiting toxicity (DLT) is manifested in ≥33% of the patients or at dose level 3 if DLT is manifested in <33% of the patients. (NCT03072043)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionmg/day (Number)
Phase 1b Dose Escalation4500

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) Defined as Complete Response + Partial Response + Hematological Improvement

Will estimate the ORR for the experimental treatments, along with the 95% credible intervals. The association between ORR and patient's clinical characteristics will be examined by Wilcoxon's rank sum test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. (NCT03094637)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years 4 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Azacitidine, Pembrolizumab) in Untreated Patients13
Treatment (Azacitidine, Pembrolizumab) Patients With Hypomethylating Agent (HMA) Failure5

[back to top]

Event Free Survival

Will be estimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier. Comparisons of time-to-event endpoints by important subgroups will be made using the log-rank tests. (NCT03094637)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (Azacitidine, Pembrolizumab) in Untreated Patients9.24
Treatment (Azacitidine, Pembrolizumab) Patients With Hypomethylating Agent (HMA) failureHMA Failure5.39

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Will be estimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier. Comparisons of time-to-event endpoints by important subgroups will be made using the log-rank tests. Overall Survival will be presented by median survival, which is the time point at which the cumulative survival drops below 50%. If there is no median survival (not reached), it means the cumulative survival was more than 50%. (NCT03094637)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (Azacitidine, Pembrolizumab) in Untreated PatientsNA
Treatment (Azacitidine, Pembrolizumab) Patients With Hypomethylating Agent (HMA) failureHMA Failure5.79

[back to top]

Rate of Cytogenetic CR

"Percentage of subjects with confirmed CR by cytogenetic assessment. Complete cytogenetic response is defined per modified IWG response criteria:~Complete: Disappearance of the chromosomal abnormality without appearance of new ones Partial: At least 50% reduction of the chromosomal abnormality" (NCT03151304)
Timeframe: 36 months

Interventionpercentage of subjects with cCR (Number)
Stage 1a and 1b Open-label Pracinostat Plus Azacitidine46.9

[back to top]

Rate of Leukemic Transformation

Percentage of subjects with leukemic transformation at landmark time point of 18 months (NCT03151304)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Stage 1a and 1b Open-label Pracinostat Plus Azacitidine13.8

[back to top]

Rate of Leukemic Transformation

Percentage of subjects with leukemic transformation at landmark time point of 24 months (NCT03151304)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Stage 1a and 1b Open-label Pracinostat Plus Azacitidine21.6

[back to top]

Rate of Leukemic Transformation

Percentage of subjects with leukemic transformation at landmark time point of 6 months (NCT03151304)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Stage 1a and 1b Open-label Pracinostat Plus Azacitidine5.4

[back to top]

Rate of Leukemic Transformation

Percentage of subjects with leukemic transformation at landmark time point of 12 months (NCT03151304)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Stage 1a and 1b Open-label Pracinostat Plus Azacitidine9.5

[back to top]

Clinical Benefit Rate

Percentage of subjects with confirmed CR, PR, Marrow CR, and HI with clinical benefit rate, defines as rate of CR + PR + HI + Marrow CR. All subjects who achieve hematologic CR, PR, marrow CR, or hematologic improvement on the erythrocytic lineage per modified IWG response criteria will be considered responders (NCT03151304)
Timeframe: 36 months

Interventionpercentage of subjects with benefit rate (Number)
Stage 1a and 1b Open-label Pracinostat Plus Azacitidine78.1

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

time from the first day of study drug administration (Day 1) to death on study (NCT03151304)
Timeframe: form day 1 to death on study, assessed up to 36 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Stage 1a and 1b Open-label Pracinostat Plus Azacitidine23.56

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

"Percentage of subjects with confirmed complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR) and marrow CR, as per modified International Working Group (IWG) criteria:~CR: Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines; Peripheral blood Hemoglobin (Hb) ≥11 g/dL; Platelets ≥100 × 10^9/L; Neutrophils ≥1.0 × 10^9/L; Blasts 0%.~PR: All CR criteria if abnormal before treatment except: Bone marrow blasts decreased by ≥ 50% over pre-treatment but still >5%; Cellularity and morphology not relevant Marrow CR: Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts and decrease by ≥50% over pre-treatment" (NCT03151304)
Timeframe: 36 months

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Stage 1a and 1b Open-label Pracinostat Plus Azacitidine35.9

[back to top]

Overall Hematologic Improvement (HI) Response Rate

"Percentage of subjects demonstrating major hematologic improvement according to modified IWG:~Erythroid response (pre-treatment, <11 g/dL): Hb increase by ≥1.5 g/dL; Relevant reduction of units of RBC transfusions by an absolute number of at least 4 RBC transfusions/8 weeks compared with the pre-treatment transfusion number in the previous 8 weeks. Only RBC transfusions given for a Hb of ≤9.0 g/dL pre-treatment will count in the RBC transfusion response evaluation.~Platelet response (pre-treatment, <100 × 10^9/L): Absolute increase of ≥30 × 10^9/L for patients starting with >20 × 10^9/L platelets; Increase from <20 × 10^9/L to >20 × 10^9/L and by at least 100%.~Neutrophil response (pre-treatment, <1.0 × 10^9/L): At least 100% increase and an absolute increase >0.5 × 10^9/L.~Progression or relapse after HI: at least 1 of the following:~At least 50% decrement from maximum response levels in granulocytes or platelets~Reduction in Hb by≥1.5 g/dL~Transfusion dependence" (NCT03151304)
Timeframe: 36 months

Interventionpercentage of subjects with HI (Number)
Stage 1a and 1b Open-label Pracinostat Plus Azacitidine71.4

[back to top]

Event-free Survival (EFS)

time from the first day of study drug administration (Day 1) to failure or death from any cause (NCT03151304)
Timeframe: 36 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Stage 1a and 1b Open-label Pracinostat Plus Azacitidine17.05

[back to top]

Complete Response (CR) Rate

"Percentage of subjects with confirmed CR (i.e., 2 CRs at least 28 days apart) as per modified IWG criteria:~CR: Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines; Peripheral blood Hb ≥11 g/dL; Platelets ≥100 × 109/L; Neutrophils ≥1.0 × 109/L; Blasts 0%." (NCT03151304)
Timeframe: 36 months

Interventionpercentage of subjects with CR (Number)
Stage 1a and 1b Open-label Pracinostat Plus Azacitidine35.9

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DoR)

For subjects who have achieved CR, PR, Marrow CR, or HI, DoR is defined as the time from the initial determination of response to the time of disease progression or death on study, whichever occurs first. (NCT03151304)
Timeframe: 36 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Stage 1a and 1b Open-label Pracinostat Plus Azacitidine15.67

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

"time from the first day of study drug administration (Day 1) to disease recurrence or progression as defined by the IWG criteria, or death on study:~Disease progression for subjects with:~Less than 5% blasts: ≥50% increase in blasts to >5% blasts 5%-10% blasts: ≥50% increase to >10% blasts 10%-20% blasts: ≥50% increase to >20% blasts 20%-30% blasts: ≥50% increase to >30% blasts~Any of the following:~At least 50% decrement from maximum remission/response in granulocytes or platelets Reduction in Hb by ≥2 g/dL Transfusion dependence" (NCT03151304)
Timeframe: 36 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Stage 1a and 1b Open-label Pracinostat Plus Azacitidine16.43

[back to top]

Cytogenetic Complete Remission (CRc) Rate

"The CRc rate is the proportion of patients who achieve a reversion to a normal karyotype at CR within the study period. This endpoint applies only to patients with abnormal cytogenetic at enrollment according to the following criterion~Morphologic CR plus reversion to a normal karyotype (defined as no clonal abnormalities detected in a minimum of 20 mitotic cells)" (NCT03151408)
Timeframe: 826 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pracinostat Plus AZA7
Placebo Plus AZA8

[back to top]

Duration of Composite Complete Remission

Duration of cCR response is the time from first cCR until documented relapse (the definition of relapse from CR will be applied) or death. Duration of cCR is only defined for patients who achieve a cCR (NCT03151408)
Timeframe: 744 days

Interventiondays (Median)
Pracinostat Plus AZA576
Placebo Plus AZA319

[back to top]

Duration of Morphologic CR

Duration of morphologic CR is defined as the time from the date of achievement of CR until the date of relapse (progression). (NCT03151408)
Timeframe: 744 days

Interventiondays (Median)
Pracinostat Plus AZANA
Placebo Plus AZA319

[back to top]

Morphologic Complete Remission (CR) Rate

"The CR rate is the proportion of patients who achieve a morphologic CR according to the response criteria~<5% blasts in a bone marrow aspirate sample with spicules~There should be no blasts with Auer rods~No EMD~Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) ≥1,000/μL~Platelet count of ≥100,000/μL~Patient must be independent of transfusions (for at least 1week before each assessment)" (NCT03151408)
Timeframe: 744 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pracinostat Plus AZA24
Placebo Plus AZA35

[back to top]

Change in Quality of Life From Baseline (EORTC QLQ-C30 - European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-life Questionnaire Core 30)

QLQ-C30 is made of multi-item scales and single-item measures (functional and symptom scales, a global health status/QoL scale and single items). Item range is the difference between possible max and min response to individual items of the scale; most items take values from 1 to 4 (range=3). Global health status takes values from 1 to 7 (range = 6). For statistical analysis purpose, single-item and scale values were all standardized (according to linear transformation described in Scoring Manual) to obtain scores ranging 0-100. An high scale score represents an higher response level. Thus an high score for a functional scale represents an high/healthy level of functioning, an high score for the global health status/QoL represents a high QoL, an high score for a symptom scale/item represents an high level of symptomatology/problems. (NCT03151408)
Timeframe: from baseline up to 660 days

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Global Health StatusFunctional Scale - Physical FunctioningFunctional Scale - Role FunctioningSymptom Scale - FatigueSymptom Scale - Nausea and VomitingSymptom Scale - Appetite Loss
Placebo Plus AZA-2.303-7.018-2.0004.2405.2633.509
Pracinostat Plus AZA-7.040-8.937-6.0342.1075.4609.771

[back to top]

Complete Remission Without Minimal Residual Disease (CRmrd) Rate

"proportion of patients who achieve a CR without minimal residual disease by multicolor flow cytometry according to the following criteria~Morphologic CR~Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) by MFC negative" (NCT03151408)
Timeframe: 826 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pracinostat Plus AZA12
Placebo Plus AZA20

[back to top]

Transfusion Independence (TI)

Transfusion independence rate is defined as the proportion of patients who show eight weeks or over without red blood cell (RBC-TI) and/or platelet (PLT-TI) transfusion during study period (NCT03151408)
Timeframe: 826 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pracinostat Plus AZA81
Placebo Plus AZA81

[back to top]

Composite Complete Remission (cCR) Rate

Composite complete remission (cCR) rate is the proportion of patients who achieve either a disease response of CR, CRi or MLFS (i.e., cCR = CR + CRi + MLFS) within the study period, according to the response criteria (NCT03151408)
Timeframe: 744 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pracinostat Plus AZA73
Placebo Plus AZA64

[back to top]

Morphologic CR Within 6 Cycles Rate

Morphologic CR within 6 cycles rate is defined as the proportion of patients who achieved CR in the absence of interceding therapies within 6 treatment cycles (i.e., during treatment phase up to Day 1 of Cycle 7 included). Analysis was performed in the ITT set. (NCT03151408)
Timeframe: within 6 cycles

Interventionnumber of patients (Number)
Pracinostat Plus AZA14
Placebo Plus AZA16

[back to top]

Overall Survival

OS measures the time from randomization to death due to any cause. (NCT03151408)
Timeframe: 826 days

Interventiondays (Median)
Pracinostat Plus AZA303
Placebo Plus AZA303

[back to top]

Progressive Free Survival Rate (PFS)

PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of relapse (progression), or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. (NCT03151408)
Timeframe: 800 days

Interventiondays (Median)
Pracinostat Plus AZA217
Placebo Plus AZA220

[back to top]

Relapse Free Survival

the time from the date of achievement of CR or CRi until the date of relapse or death from any cause (NCT03151408)
Timeframe: 744 days

Interventiondays (Median)
Pracinostat Plus AZA291
Placebo Plus AZA190

[back to top]

Time to CR

Time to CR is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of CR in the absence of interceding therapies. The analysis set was the ITT set. (NCT03151408)
Timeframe: 616 days

Interventiondays (Median)
Pracinostat Plus AZANA
Placebo Plus AZA361

[back to top]

Quality of Life (QOL) Relative to Any Degree of Response (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Physical Health)

Quality of Life (QOL) was assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Physical Health. Overall scores were derived from five quality of life domains: physical function, pain interference, fatigue, emotional health and social health). T-Score distributions are standardized so that a score of 50 represents the mean for the US general population with a standard deviation around that mean of 10 points. (NCT03165721)
Timeframe: Baseline, at the end of cycle 4, and post therapy follow up, approximately 30 days after the final dose of study drug

,,
Interventiont-score (Mean)
BaselineEnd of cycle 4Post therapy follow up, approximately 30 days after the final dose of study drug
Patients ≥ 12 Years of Age w/HLRCC-associated Renal Cell Ca57.7NANA
Patients ≥ 12 Years of Age w/PHEO/PGL With SDH-deficient PHE54.161.954.1
Patients ≥ 12 Years of Age w/Wild-Type GIST45.946.544.2

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival Probability at 6 Months

Time interval from start of treatment to documented evidence of disease progression. Progression were evaluated in this study using the new international criteria proposed by the revised Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline (version 1.1). Disease progression is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progressions. (NCT03165721)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionPercent probability (Number)
Patients ≥ 12 Years of Age w/Wild-Type GIST85.7
Patients ≥ 12 Years of Age w/PHEO/PGL With SDH-deficient PHE0
Patients ≥ 12 Years of Age w/HLRCC-associated Renal Cell Ca0

[back to top]

V(2)/F (Apparent Volume of Distribution)

Apparent volume of distribution is the theoretical volume that would be necessary to contain the total amount of an administered drug at the same concentration that it is observed in the blood plasma. (NCT03165721)
Timeframe: Prior to first dose in cycle 1 and at 0.5 hour (+/- 15 minutes), 1 hour (+/- 15 minutes), 2 hour (+/-30 minutes), 4 hour (+/- 30 minutes), 6 hour (+/- 1 hour) and 24 hours (+/- 2 hours) after the first dose of drug in Cycle 1.

InterventionL (Number)
Patient 2Patient 3
Patients≥12 Years of Age w/Wild-Type GIST, SDH-deficient PHEO/PGL, or HLRCC-associated Renal Cell Ca11271147

[back to top]

Quality of Life (QOL) Relative to Any Degree of Response (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Mental Health)

Quality of Life (QOL) was assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Mental Health. Overall scores were derived from five quality of life domains: physical function, pain interference, fatigue, emotional health and social health). T-Score distributions are standardized so that a score of 50 represents the mean for the US general population with a standard deviation around that mean of 10 points. (NCT03165721)
Timeframe: Baseline, at the end of cycle 4, and post therapy follow up, approximately 30 days after the final dose of study drug

,
Interventiont-score (Mean)
BaselineEnd of cycle 4Post therapy follow up, approximately 30 days after the final dose of study drug
Patients ≥ 12 Years of Age w/PHEO/PGL With SDH-deficient PHE41.153.345.8
Patients ≥ 12 Years of Age w/Wild-Type GIST43.246.041.2

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) Probability at 12 Months

Time interval from start of treatment to documented evidence of disease progression. Progression were evaluated in this study using the new international criteria proposed by the revised Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline (version 1.1). Disease progression is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progressions (NCT03165721)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionPercent probability (Number)
Patients ≥ 12 Years of Age w/Wild-Type GIST53.6
Patients ≥ 12 Years of Age w/PHEO/PGL With SDH-deficient PHE0
Patients ≥ 12 Years of Age w/HLRCC-associated Renal Cell Ca0

[back to top]

Percent Decrease in Long Interspersed Nuclear Element -1 (LINE-1) Demethylation

Percent decrease from baseline in long interspersed nuclear element -1 (LINE-1) demethylation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) using pyrosequencing and urine and plasma glycolytic metabolites. (NCT03165721)
Timeframe: Day 14 of cycle 1

InterventionPercent decrease (Mean)
Patients≥12 Years of Age w/Wild-Type GIST, SDH-deficient PHEO/PGL, or HLRCC-associated Renal Cell Ca45

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious and Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0)

Here is the number of participants with serious and non-serious adverse events assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0). A non-serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence. A serious adverse event is an adverse event or suspected adverse reaction that results in death, a life-threatening adverse drug experience, hospitalization, disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect or important medical events that jeopardize the patient or subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the previous outcomes mentioned. (NCT03165721)
Timeframe: Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approx. 1 mos and 5 days for the Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) group; 3 mos and 25 days for the Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma (Pheo/PGL) group;and 30 mos and 2 days for the Renal Cell Cancer group.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Patients ≥ 12 Years of Age w/Wild-Type GIST7
Patients ≥ 12 Years of Age w/PHEO/PGL With SDH-deficient PHE1
Patients ≥ 12 Years of Age w/HLRCC-associated Renal Cell Ca1

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Guadecitabine (SGI-110)

The maximum observed analyte concentration in serum was reported. (NCT03165721)
Timeframe: Prior to first dose in cycle 1 and at 0.5 hour (+/- 15 minutes), 1 hour (+/- 15 minutes), 2 hour (+/-30 minutes), 4 hour (+/- 30 minutes), 6 hour (+/- 1 hour) and 24 hours (+/- 2 hours) after the first dose of drug in Cycle 1.

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Patients≥12 Years of Age w/Wild-Type GIST, SDH-deficient PHEO/PGL, or HLRCC-associated Renal Cell Ca45

[back to top]

Quality of Life (QOL) Relative to Any Degree of Response (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Mental Health)

Quality of Life (QOL) was assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Mental Health. Overall scores were derived from five quality of life domains: physical function, pain interference, fatigue, emotional health and social health). T-Score distributions are standardized so that a score of 50 represents the mean for the US general population with a standard deviation around that mean of 10 points. (NCT03165721)
Timeframe: Baseline, at the end of cycle 4, and post therapy follow up, approximately 30 days after the final dose of study drug

Interventiont-score (Mean)
Baseline
Patients ≥ 12 Years of Age w/HLRCC-associated Renal Cell Ca62.5

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC 0-5hr)

The AUC is a measure of the serum concentration of the drug over time. It is used to characterize drug absorption. (NCT03165721)
Timeframe: Prior to first dose in cycle 1 and at 0.5 hour (+/- 15 minutes), 1 hour (+/- 15 minutes), 2 hour (+/-30 minutes), 4 hour (+/- 30 minutes), 6 hour (+/- 1 hour) and 24 hours (+/- 2 hours) after the first dose of drug in Cycle 1.

Interventionhr*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Patients≥12 Years of Age w/Wild-Type GIST, SDH-deficient PHEO/PGL, or HLRCC-associated Renal Cell Ca114.1

[back to top]

(CL/F) Apparent Total Body Clearance

Apparent total body clearance is the time it takes for all Guadecitabine (SGI-110) to be removed from the body. (NCT03165721)
Timeframe: Prior to first dose in cycle 1 and at 0.5 hour (+/- 15 minutes), 1 hour (+/- 15 minutes), 2 hour (+/-30 minutes), 4 hour (+/- 30 minutes), 6 hour (+/- 1 hour) and 24 hours (+/- 2 hours) after the first dose of drug in Cycle 1.

InterventionL/hr (Number)
Patient 2Patient 3
Patients≥12 Years of Age w/Wild-Type GIST, SDH-deficient PHEO/PGL, or HLRCC-associated Renal Cell Ca452588

[back to top]

Number of Participants With an Overall Response (Complete Response or Partial Response) of SGI-11 Using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)

Clinical activity of SGI-11 was assessed using the RECISTv1.1. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. Partial Response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. (NCT03165721)
Timeframe: After the first 4 weeks, then every 8 weeks up to 65 weeks

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete ResponsePartial Response
Patients ≥ 12 Years of Age w/HLRCC-associated Renal Cell Ca00
Patients ≥ 12 Years of Age w/PHEO/PGL With SDH-deficient PHE00
Patients ≥ 12 Years of Age w/Wild-Type GIST00

[back to top]

Half Life (t1/2) of Guadecitabine (SGI-110)

Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration of the drug to decrease by one half. (NCT03165721)
Timeframe: Prior to first dose in cycle 1 and at 0.5 hour (+/- 15 minutes), 1 hour (+/- 15 minutes), 2 hour (+/-30 minutes), 4 hour (+/- 30 minutes), 6 hour (+/- 1 hour) and 24 hours (+/- 2 hours) after the first dose of drug in Cycle 1.

Interventionhrs (Number)
Patient 2Patient 3
Patients≥12 Years of Age w/Wild-Type GIST, SDH-deficient PHEO/PGL, or HLRCC-associated Renal Cell Ca1.731.35

[back to top]

Change in Distress From Baseline

Change in distress from baseline was assessed by The Distress Thermometer (DT) visual analog scale. An overall score is derived from specific physical, emotional and family issues identified by the participant to be stressful. No distress (0-4), moderate stress (5) and high distress (6-10). (NCT03165721)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of cycle 4, and post therapy follow up, approximately 30 days after the final dose of study drug

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Baseline
Patients ≥ 12 Years of Age w/HLRCC-associated Renal Cell Ca2

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Guadecitabine (SGI-110)

Time it takes Guadecitabine (SGI-110) the reach the maximum concentration in plasma. (NCT03165721)
Timeframe: Prior to first dose in cycle 1 and at 0.5 hour (+/- 15 minutes), 1 hour (+/- 15 minutes), 2 hour (+/-30 minutes), 4 hour (+/- 30 minutes), 6 hour (+/- 1 hour) and 24 hours (+/- 2 hours) after the first dose of drug in Cycle 1.

Interventionhr (Median)
Patients≥12 Years of Age w/Wild-Type GIST, SDH-deficient PHEO/PGL, or HLRCC-associated Renal Cell Ca4.0

[back to top]

Change in Distress From Baseline

Change in distress from baseline was assessed by The Distress Thermometer (DT) visual analog scale. An overall score is derived from specific physical, emotional and family issues identified by the participant to be stressful. No distress (0-4), moderate stress (5) and high distress (6-10). (NCT03165721)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of cycle 4, and post therapy follow up, approximately 30 days after the final dose of study drug

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineEnd of cycle 4Post therapy follow up, approximately 30 days after the final dose of study drug
Patients ≥ 12 Years of Age w/PHEO/PGL With SDH-deficient PHE723
Patients ≥ 12 Years of Age w/Wild-Type GIST6.44.54.1

[back to top]

Event-Free Survival (EFS)

EFS was defined as the time from randomization until treatment failure, relapse from remission, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Treatment failure was defined as failure to achieve complete remission (CR) by Week 24. CR: Bone marrow blasts <5% and no Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1.0 × 10^9 per litre (10^9/L) (1000 per microlitre [1000/μL]); platelet count ≥100 × 10^9/L (100,000/μL); independence of red blood cell transfusions. Participants who had an EFS event (relapse or death) after, 2 or more missing disease assessments were censored at the last adequate disease assessment documenting no relapse before the missing assessments. The reported data represents the Kaplan-Meier median value. (NCT03173248)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24

Interventionmonths (Median)
AG-120 + Azacitidine0.03
Placebo + Azacitidine0.03

[back to top]

Rate of Marrow Complete Response (mCR)

Will assess morphologic features (e.g. presence of dysplastic features), presence of cytogenetic and/or molecular aberrancies, and myeloblast count. mCR is defined as the percentage of patients with only marrow CR among all patients evaluated. (NCT03238248)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pevonedistat and Azacitidine11.9

[back to top]

Rate of Hematologic Response Per IWG

Will assess complete and differential blood counts (peripheral blood), and transfusion requirements. The rate of hematologic improvement is defined as the percentage of patients with only hematologic improvement (defined in the protocol) among all patients evaluated for response. (NCT03238248)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pevonedistat and Azacitidine7.5

[back to top]

Overall Survial Time

Overall survival time is defined as time from day 1 in cycle 1 to death for any reason. Patiens alive at last follow up were censored. Overall survival time will be summarized using the method of Kaplan and Meier. (NCT03238248)
Timeframe: up to 2 years after treatment, a maximum possible duration of 38 months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Pevonedistat and Azacitidine18.3

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

Objective response rate is defined as the percentage of patients with best response of Complete remission (CR), Hematologic improvement (HI), Marrow CR (mCR), or Partial remission (PR) among all patients evaluated. The other categories of response are progressive disease, stable disease and inevaluable. The modified recommendations of the International Working Group (IWG) for Response Criteria for altering natural history of MDS , as well as the International Consortium of clinical experts in MDS/MPN devised uniform response criteria and criteria for disease progression in MDS/MPN overlap syndromes based on three independent academic MDS/MPN workshops (Marsh 2013, December 2013 and June 2014) were used for response assessment. (NCT03238248)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pevonedistat and Azacitidine23.9

[back to top]

Time to Progression

Progression-free survival time is defined as time from day1 in cycle 1 to progression or death. Those alive without progression at the last follow up were censored. This survival will be summarized using the method of Kaplan and Meier. (NCT03238248)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months, or death

Interventionmonths (Median)
Pevonedistat and Azacitidine9.9

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the time from the first day of trial treatment to the first documented disease progression per RECIST 1.1 (At least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression)) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. (NCT03264404)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab1.58

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. (NCT03268954)
Timeframe: Up to data cut-off date: 28 May 2021 (up to approximately 42 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^216.8
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^220.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Overall Response 2 (OR2)

OR2=participant with best overall response of CR+PR+HI in HR MDS/CMML participants,or of CR+CRi+PR in low-blast AML participants.CR:≤5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all bone marrow(BM)cell lines,≥11g/dL Hgb,≥100*10^9/L pl,≥1.0*10^9/L neutrophils,0% blasts in peripheral blood;PR:all CR criteria met except BM blasts ≥50% decrease over pretreatment but still >5%;HI:Hgb increase(inc) ≥1.5g/dL if baseline(BL)<11 g/dL;pl inc≥30*10^9/L if BL>20*10^9/L or inc from <20*10^9/L to >20*10^9/L and by 100%;neutrophil inc by 100%;absolute inc of >0.5*10^9/L if BL<100*10^9/L.For low-blast AML-CR:morphologic leukemia-free state >1.0*10^9 neutrophils,≥100*10^9/L pl,transfusion independence,no residual evidence of extramedullary leukemia;CR with incomplete blood count recovery:fulfill CR criteria except residual neutropenia <1.0*10^9/L or pl<100*10^9/L;PR:all CR hematological values but ≥50% decrease in BM aspirate.Number of responders determined by independent review committee(IRC) assessment. (NCT03268954)
Timeframe: From randomization until, CR, PR or HI or CR, CRi or PR till data cut-off date: 28 May 2021 (up to approximately 42 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^294
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^294

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Overall Response (OR)

Disease responses for HR MDS/CMML based on Modified IWG Response Criteria for MDS; for low-blast AML on Revised IWG Response Criteria for AML. Overall response=CR or PR for HR MDS/CMML and CR + CRi + PR for low-blast AML. CR for HR MDS/CMML: <=5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all bone marrow cell lines, >=11 g/dL Hgb, >=100*10^9/L pl, >=1.0*10^9/L neutrophils, 0% blasts in peripheral blood and PR: all CR criteria met except bone marrow blasts >=50% decrease over pretreatment but still>5%. For low-blast AML-CR:morphologic leukemia-free state>1.0*10^9 neutrophils, >=100*10^9/L pl, transfusion independence, no residual evidence of extramedullary leukemia; CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi): fulfill CR criteria except residual neutropenia <1.0*10^9/L or pl <100*10^9/L; PR: all CR hematological values but >=50% decrease in bone marrow aspirate. (NCT03268954)
Timeframe: From randomization until CR and PR or CR, CRi and PR till data cut-off date: 28 May 2021 (up to approximately 42 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^273
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^264

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hematologic Improvement (HI)

Disease responses for HR MDS/CMML based on Modified IWG Response Criteria for MDS. HI: Hgb increase >=1.5 g/dL if baseline <11 g/dL; pl increase >=30*10^9/L if baseline >20*10^9/L or increase from <20*10^9/L to >20*10^9/L by at least 100%; neutrophil increase by 100% and absolute increase of >0.5*10^9/L if baseline <1.0*10^9/L. (NCT03268954)
Timeframe: From randomization until HI till data cut-off date: 28 May 2021 (up to approximately 42 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^276
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^270

[back to top]

Number of Participants With CR, Partial Remission (PR) and Hematologic Improvement (HI)

Disease responses for HR MDS/CMML based on Modified IWG Response Criteria for MDS. CR: <=5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all bone marrow cell lines, >=11 g/dL Hgb, >=100*10^9/L pl, >=1.0*10^9/L neutrophils,0% blasts in peripheral blood. Marrow CR: Bone marrow: <=5% myeloblasts and decrease by >=50% over pretreatment. PR: all CR criteria met except bone marrow blasts >=50% decrease over pretreatment but still >5%. HI: Hgb increase >=1.5 g/dL if <11 g/dL; pl increase >=30*10^9/L if baseline>20*10^9/L or increase from <20*10^9/L to >20*10^9/L and by at least 100%; neutrophil increase by 100% and absolute increase of >0.5*10^9/L if baseline <1.0*10^9/L. (NCT03268954)
Timeframe: From randomization until, CR, PR or HI till data cut-off date: 28 May 2021 (up to approximately 42 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^277
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^276

[back to top]

Number of Participants With CR and Marrow CR, PR and Hematologic Improvement (HI)

Disease responses for HR MDS/CMML based on Modified IWG Response Criteria for MDS. CR: <=5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all bone marrow cell lines, >=11 g/dL Hgb, >=100*10^9/L pl, >=1.0*10^9/L neutrophils,0% blasts in peripheral blood. Marrow CR: Bone marrow: <=5% myeloblasts and decrease by >=50% over pretreatment. PR: all CR criteria met except bone marrow blasts >=50% decrease over pretreatment but still>5%. HI: Hgb increase >=1.5 g/dL if baseline <11 g/dL; pl increase >=30*10^9/L if baseline>20*10^9/L or increases from <20*10^9/L to >20*10^9/L and by at least 100%; neutrophil increases by 100% and absolute increases of >0.5*10^9/L if baseline <1.0*10^9/L. (NCT03268954)
Timeframe: From randomization until CR, marrow CR, PR or HI till data cut-off date: 28 May 2021 (up to approximately 42 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2112
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2117

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Overall Response by Cycle 6

Responses for HR MDS/CMML are based on Modified International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for MDS and for low-blast AML on Revised IWG Response Criteria for AML. Overall response=CR and PR for HR MDS/CMML and CR+CR with incomplete blood count recovery(CRi)+PR for low-blast AML. CR for HR MDS/CMML:<=5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all bone marrow cell lines,>=11g/dL hemoglobin (Hgb),>=100*10^9/L platelet (pl),>=1.0*10^9/L neutrophils, 0% blasts in peripheral blood, and PR:all CR criteria met except bone marrow blasts >=50% decrease over pretreatment but still >5%. For low-blast AML-CR:morphologic leukemia-free state,>1.0*10^9 neutrophils, >=100*10^9/L pl, transfusion independence, no residual evidence of extramedullary leukemia;CRi:fulfill CR criteria except residual neutropenia <1.0*10^9/L/thrombocytopenia (pl<100*10^9/L); PR:all CR hematological values but>=50% decrease in percentage of blasts to 5%-25% in bone marrow aspirate. (NCT03268954)
Timeframe: Up to Cycle 6 (up to approximately Day 168)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Overall Response for HR MDS/CMMLOverall Response for Low-blast AML
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^23613
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^22922

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Overall Response in Participants Who Have TP53 Mutations, 17p Deletions, and/or Are Determined to be in an Adverse Cytogenetic Risk Group

Disease responses for HR MDS/CMML based on Modified IWG Response Criteria for MDS; for low-blast AML on Revised IWG Response Criteria for AML. Overall response=CR + PR for HR MDS/CMML and CR + CRi + PR for low-blast AML. CR for HR MDS/CMML: <=5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all bone marrow cell lines, >=11 g/dL Hgb, >=100*10^9/L pl, >=1.0*10^9/L neutrophils,0% blasts in peripheral blood and PR: all CR criteria met except bone marrow blasts>=50% decrease over pretreatment but still>5%. For low-blast AML-CR: morphologic leukemia-free state, >1.0*10^9 neutrophils,>=100*10^9/L pl, transfusion independence, no residual evidence of extramedullary leukemia; CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi): fulfill CR criteria except residual neutropenia<1.0*10^9/L or pl<100*10^9/L; PR: all CR hematological values but>=50% decrease in the percentage of blasts to 5% to 25% in bone marrow aspirate. (NCT03268954)
Timeframe: From randomization until CR, CRi and PR till data cut-off date: 28 May 2021 (up to approximately 42 months)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
OR: HR MDS/CMML ParticipantsOR: Low-blast AML Participants
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^21413
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^21312

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Red Blood Cells (RBCs) and Platelet-transfusion Independence

A participant was defined as RBC or platelet-transfusion independent if he/she received no RBC or platelet transfusions for a period of at least 8 weeks before the first dose of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of any study drug. Rate of transfusion independence was defined as number of participants who became transfusion independent divided by the number of participants who were transfusion dependent at Baseline. (NCT03268954)
Timeframe: Up to data cut-off date: 28 May 2021 (up to approximately 42 months)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Percentage of Participants With RBCs-transfusion IndependencePercentage of Participants With Platelet-transfusion Independence
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^244.348.9
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^247.545.5

[back to top]

Time to Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) Transformation in Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (HR MDS), Higher-Risk Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemias (HR CMML) and HR MDS/CMML Participants

Time to AML transformation in HR MDS and CMML participants was defined as time from randomization to documented AML transformation as determined by the independent review committee (IRC) assessment. Participants who died before progression to AML were censored. Transformation to AML was defined, according to WHO classification, as a participant having 20% blasts in the blood or marrow and increase of blast count by 50%. (NCT03268954)
Timeframe: From randomization until transformation to AML till data cut-off date: 28 May 2021 (up to approximately 42 months)

,
Interventionmonths (Median)
HR MDS ParticipantsHR CMML ParticipantsHR MDS/CMML Participants
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^235.6NA35.6
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2NANANA

[back to top]

Time to First Complete Remission (CR) or Partial Remission (PR) or Complete Remission With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi)

Time to first CR or PR is defined as the time from randomization to first documented CR or PR, whichever occurs first. Disease responses for HR MDS or CMML or low-blast AML cycle 6 are based on Modified IWG Response Criteria for MDS and for low-blast AML on Revised IWG Response Criteria for AML. For HR MDS or CMML-CR:<=5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all bone marrow cell lines,>=11 g/dL Hgb,>=100*10^9/L pl,>=1.0*10^9/L neutrophils, 0% blasts in peripheral blood; PR: all CR criteria met except bone marrow blasts>=50% decrease over pretreatment but still>5%; For low-blast AML-CR: morphologic leukemia-free state,>1.0*10^9/L neutrophils, pl>=100*10^9/L, transfusion independence, no residual evidence of extramedullary leukemia; CR with incomplete blood count recovery: fulfill CR criteria except residual neutropenia<1.0*10^9/L or pl <100*10^9/L; PR: all CR hematological values but with a decrease of at least 50% in the percentage of blasts to 5% to 25% in the bone marrow aspirate. (NCT03268954)
Timeframe: From randomization until CR or PR till data cut-off date: 28 May 2021 (up to approximately 42 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2NA
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2NA

[back to top]

Time to Progressive Disease (PD), Relapse After CR (Low-blast AML), Relapse After CR or PR (HR MDS/CMML), or Death

Time to PD, relapse after CR(low-blast AML), relapse after CR or PR(HR MDS/CMML), or death,defined as time from date of randomization until date of first documentation of PD,relapse after CR(low-blast AML),relapse after CR or PR(HR MDS/CMML),or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. In HR MDS/CMML,PD: Participants with<5% blasts:>=50% inc >5% blasts, with 5%-9% blasts:>=50% inc>10% blasts, with 10%-19% blasts:>=50% inc >20% blasts,with 20%-30% blasts, at least 50% decrement from maximum remission/response in granulocytes or pl or reduction in Hgb by>=2 g/dL/new transfusion dependence.Relapse after CR or PR: return to pretreatment bone marrow blast %/Decrement of >=50% from maximum remission/response levels in granulocytes/pl/reduction in Hgb conc.>=1.5 g/dL/transfusion dependence. In AML,PD:>50% inc in bone marrow blasts to >30% blasts,>50% inc in circulating blasts to>30% blasts in peripheral blood, Development of extramedullary disease/new sites of extramedullary leukemia. (NCT03268954)
Timeframe: From randomization until PD, relapse after CR, or relapse after CR or PR, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first till data cut-off date: 28 May 2021 (up to approximately 42 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^211.8
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^213.1

[back to top]

Duration of Red Blood Cells (RBCs) and Duration of Platelet-transfusion Independence and Duration of Red Blood Cells (RBCs) and Platelet-transfusion Independence

Duration of RBC and platelet transfusion independence was defined as the longest time between the last RBC and/or platelet transfusion before the start of the RBC and/or platelet transfusion-independent period and the first RBC and/or platelet transfusion after the start of the transfusion-independent period, which occurs >= 8 weeks later. (NCT03268954)
Timeframe: Up to data cut-off date: 28 May 2021 (up to approximately 42 months)

,
Interventionmonths (Median)
Duration of RBC Transfusion IndependenceDuration of Platelet Transfusion IndependenceDuration of Transfusion Independence
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^215.614.912.0
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^213.511.613.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With CR and Marrow CR and PR

Disease responses for HR MDS/CMML based on Modified IWG Response Criteria for MDS. CR: <=5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all bone marrow cell lines, >=11 g/dL Hgb, >=100*10^9/L pl, >=1.0*10^9/L neutrophils,0% blasts in peripheral blood. Marrow CR: Bone marrow: <=5% myeloblasts and decrease by >=50% over pretreatment. PR: all CR criteria met except bone marrow blasts >=50% decrease over pretreatment but still >5%. (NCT03268954)
Timeframe: From randomization until CR or Marrow CR and PR till data cut-off date: 28 May 2021 (up to approximately 42 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^291
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^287

[back to top]

Number of Participants With CR and Marrow CR

Disease responses for HR MDS or CMML are based on the International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for MDS. CR for HR MDS or CMML is defined as <=5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines in the bone marrow, and >=11 g/dL Hgb, >=100*10^9/L platelets (pl), >=1.0*10^9/L neutrophils and 0% blasts in peripheral blood. Marrow CR: Bone marrow: <=5% myeloblasts and decrease by >=50% over pretreatment. (NCT03268954)
Timeframe: From randomization until CR or marrow CR till data cut-off date: 28 May 2021 (up to approximately 42 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^291
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^287

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Complete Remission (CR) and CR+ Complete Remission With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi)

CR for HR MDS or CMML is defined as <=5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines in the bone marrow, and greater than or equal to >=11 gram per deciliter (g/dL) hemoglobin (Hgb),>=100*10^9/liter (/L) platelets (pl),>=1.0*10^9/L neutrophils and 0% blasts in peripheral blood. CR for low-blast AML: morphologic leukemia-free state, neutrophils of more than 1.0*10^9/L and pl of >=100*10^9/L, transfusion independence, and no residual evidence of extramedullary leukemia. CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) for low-blast AML: participants fulfill all of the criteria for CR except for residual neutropenia (<1.0*10^9/L) or thrombocytopenia (pl<100*10^9/L). (NCT03268954)
Timeframe: From randomization until CR till data cut-off date: 28 May 2021 (up to approximately 42 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^271
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^263

[back to top] [back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Six-Month Survival Rate

Kaplan-Meier estimates for the probability (expressed as a percentage) of participants that survived at the end of Month 6 from randomization are presented. (NCT03268954)
Timeframe: Up to Month 6

Interventionpercentage probability (Number)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^20.825
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^20.810

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimates of One-Year Survival Rate

Kaplan-Meier estimates for the probability (expressed as a percentage) of participants that survived at the end of the first year from randomization are presented. (NCT03268954)
Timeframe: Up to Year 1

Interventionpercentage probability (Number)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^20.693
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^20.646

[back to top]

Event-Free Survival (EFS)

EFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of an EFS event. An EFS event was defined as death or transformation to acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) (World Health Organization [WHO] classification as a participant having greater than 20 % blasts in the blood or marrow and an increase of blast count by 50%), whichever event occurred first, in participants with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or chronic myelomonocytic leukemias (CMML). An EFS event was defined as death in participants with low-blast AML. (NCT03268954)
Timeframe: From randomization until transformation to acute myeloid leukemia, or death due to any cause up to data cut-off date: 28 May 2021 (up to approximately 42 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^215.7
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^217.7

[back to top]

Duration of Overall Response 2 (OR2)

Duration of OR2: from date of first documentation of CR+PR+HI to first documentation of PD/relapse after CR/PR for responders of CR+PR+HI for HR MDS/CMML and CR,CRi,PR for low-blast AML. For HR MDS/CMML-CR:<=5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all bone marrow cell lines,>=11 g/dL Hgb, >=100*10^9/L pl,>=1.0*10^9/L neutrophils, 0% blasts in peripheral blood; PR: all CR criteria met except bone marrow blasts>=50% decrease over pretreatment, still >5%; HI:Hgb inc >=1.5 g/dL if baseline <11 g/dL; pl inc>=30*10^9/L if baseline>20*10^9/L or inc from<20*10^9/L to>20*10^9/L by at least 100%; neutrophil inc by 100% and absolute inc of >0.5*10^9/L if baseline <1.0*10^9/L.For low-blast AML-CR: morphologic leukemia-free state,>1.0*10^9 neutrophils,>=100*10^9/L pl, transfusion independence, no residual evidence of extramedullary leukemia;CRi: fulfill CR criteria except residual neutropenia<1.0*10^9/L or pl <100*10^9/L;PR:all CR hematological values but>=50% decrease in bone marrow aspirate. (NCT03268954)
Timeframe: Up to data cut-off date: 28 May 2021 (up to approximately 42 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^218.3
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^218.9

[back to top]

Duration of Overall Response (OR)

Duration of OR: response to first documentation of PD or relapse from CR for low-blast AML or relapse after CR or PR for HR MDS/CMML. Disease responses for HR MDS/CMML based on Modified IWG Response Criteria for MDS; for low-blast AML on Revised IWG Response Criteria for AML. Overall response=CR+PR for HR MDS/CMML and CR+Cri+ PR for low-blast AML.CR for HR MDS/CMML:<=5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all bone marrow cell lines,>=11 g/dL Hgb,>=100*10^9/L pl,>=1.0*10^9/L neutrophils,0% blasts in peripheral blood and PR:all CR criteria met except bone marrow blasts>=50% decrease over pretreatment but still >5%. For low-blast AML-CR: morphologic leukemia-free state >1.0*10^9 neutrophils,>=100*10^9/L pl, transfusion independence, no residual evidence of extramedullary leukemia; CR with CRi: fulfill CR criteria except residual neutropenia <1.0*10^9/L or pl <100*10^9/L; PR: all CR hematological values but >=50% decrease in % of blasts in bone marrow aspirate. (NCT03268954)
Timeframe: Up to data cut-off date: 28 May 2021 (up to approximately 42 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^218.3
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^217.1

[back to top]

Duration of Complete Remission + Complete Remission With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi)

Duration of CR is first documented CR to the first documentation of PD or relapse from CR (participants with low-blast AML). Disease responses for low-blast AML were based on the Revised IWG Response Criteria for AML. CR is defined as <=5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines in the bone marrow, and greater than or equal to >=11 g/dL hemoglobin (Hgb),>=100*10^9/liter (/L) platelets (pl),>=1.0*10^9/L neutrophils and 0% blasts in peripheral blood. CR for low-blast AML: morphologic leukemia-free state, neutrophils of more than 1.0*10^9/L and pl of >=100*10^9/L, transfusion independence, and no residual evidence of extramedullary leukemia. CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) for low-blast AML: participants fulfill all of the criteria for CR except for residual neutropenia (<1.0*10^9/L) or thrombocytopenia (pl<100*10^9/L). (NCT03268954)
Timeframe: From CR until first documentation of PD or relapse from CR or relapse after CR or PR till data cut-off date: 28 May 2021 (up to approximately 42 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^28.5
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^215.0

[back to top] [back to top]

Overall Survival in Participants Who Have TP53 Mutations, 17p Deletions, and/or Are Determined to be in an Adverse Cytogenetic Risk Group

OS was calculated from date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the analysis were censored as of the date the participant was last known to be alive. (NCT03268954)
Timeframe: From randomization until death till data cut-off date: 28 May 2021 (up to approximately 42 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^212.8
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^216.1

[back to top]

Duration of Complete Remission (CR)

Duration of CR is first documented CR to the first documentation of PD or relapse from CR (participants with low-blast AML) or relapse after CR or PR (participants with HR MDS/CMML). Disease responses for HR MDS or CMML are based on the Modified IWG Response Criteria for MDS and for low-blast AML on the Revised IWG Response Criteria for AML. CR for HR MDS or CMML is defined as <=5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines in the bone marrow, and greater than or equal to >=11 g/dL Hgb,>=100*10^9/L pl,>=1.0*10^9/L neutrophils and 0% blasts in peripheral blood. CR for low-blast AML: morphologic leukemia-free state, neutrophils of more than 1.0*10^9/L and pl of >=100*10^9/L, transfusion independence, and no residual evidence of extramedullary leukemia. CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) for low-blast AML: participants fulfill all of the criteria for CR except for residual neutropenia (<1.0*10^9/L) or thrombocytopenia (pl<100*10^9/L). (NCT03268954)
Timeframe: From CR until first documentation of PD or relapse from CR or relapse after CR or PR till data cut-off date: 28 May 2021 (up to approximately 42 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^213.1
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^217.2

[back to top]

Event-Free Survival in Participants Who Have TP53 Mutations, 17p Deletions, and/or Are Determined to be in an Adverse Cytogenetic Risk Group

Event was defined as death or transformation to AML in participants with MDS or CMML, whichever occurred first. Transformation to AML was defined, according to World Health Organization (WHO) Classification as a participant having >20% blasts in the blood or marrow and increase of blast count by 50%. Event was defined as death in participants with low-blast AML. (NCT03268954)
Timeframe: From randomization until transformation to AML if eligible or death till data cut-off date: 28 May 2021 (up to approximately 42 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^212.8
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^214.6

[back to top]

Sixty-Day Mortality Reported as Number of Participants Who Died Up to Day 60

60-day mortality was defined as number of participants who died within 60 days from the first dose of study drug. (NCT03268954)
Timeframe: Up to Day 60

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^215
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^214

[back to top]

Thirty-Day Mortality Reported as Number of Participants Who Died Up to Day 30

30-day mortality was defined as number of participants who died within 30 days from the first dose of study drug. (NCT03268954)
Timeframe: Up to Day 30

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^26
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^25

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Time from date of treatment start until date of death due to any cause or last Follow-up. (NCT03390296)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm A (Anti-OX40 Antibody PF-04518600)3.0
Arm B (Azacitidine, Venetoclax, GO)7.6
Arm C (Azacitidine, GO, Avelumab)5.9
Arm D (Azacitidine, Venetoclax, Avelumab)4.8
Arm F (GO, Glasdegib)1.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Response

Response is: CR + complete response with incomplete recovery of platelets (CRp) + complete response with incomplete recovery of counts (CRi) within 3 months. CR: Bone Marrow blasts /= 1,000, Platelets >/= 100 and no extra medullary disease.CRp: Bone Marrow blasts /= 1,000 and no extra medullary disease. CRi: Bone Marrow blasts NCT03390296)
Timeframe: within 3 months of initiation of therapy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A (Anti-OX40 Antibody PF-04518600)0
Arm B (Azacitidine, Venetoclax, GO)8
Arm C (Azacitidine, GO, Avelumab)1
Arm D (Azacitidine, Venetoclax, Avelumab)2
Arm F (GO, Glasdegib)0

[back to top]

Intensive Study: Overall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants last known to be alive were to be censored at the date of last contact. (NCT03416179)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 25 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Intensive Study: Glasdegib + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin17.3
Intensive Study: Placebo + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin20.4

[back to top]

Non-intensive Study: Percentage of Participants With Morphologic Leukemia-free State (MLFS)

MLFS was defined based on 2017 ELN recommendations. MLFS: MRD (positive or unknown), bone marrow blasts <5%, no hematologic recovery required, marrow should not be aplastic, at least 200 cells enumerated or cellularity absence of extramedullary disease >=10%, and absence of blasts with Auer rods. (NCT03416179)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to maximum of 3 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Non-intensive Study: Glasdegib + Azacitidine3.1
Non-intensive Study: Placebo + Azacitidine0.6

[back to top]

Intensive Study: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Coagulation Laboratory Abnormalities Graded by NCI CTCAE v.4.03

Coagulation laboratory test included: activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged, and INR increased. Laboratory results were categorically summarized according to the NCI-CTCAE criteria v4.03. Grade 0= no abnormality; Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe and Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling. Number of participants with shift from baseline for coagulation were assessed. Only those laboratory test parameters in which at least 1 participant had data were reported. (NCT03416179)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to maximum of 2 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade 0 (CTCAE grade)Activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade 1 (CTCAE grade)Activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged: Grade 0 (baseline grade) to Grade 0 (CTCAE grade)Activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged: Grade 0 (baseline grade) to Grade 1 (CTCAE grade)Activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged: Grade 0 (baseline grade) to Grade 2 (CTCAE grade)Activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged: Grade 0 (baseline grade) to Grade 3 (CTCAE grade)Activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged: Grade 1 (baseline grade) to Grade 1 (CTCAE grade)INR increased: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade 0 (CTCAE grade)INR increased: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade 1 (CTCAE grade)INR increased: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade 2 (CTCAE grade)INR increased: Grade 0 (baseline grade) to Grade 0 (CTCAE grade)INR increased: Grade 0 (baseline grade) to Grade 1 (CTCAE grade)INR increased: Grade 0 (baseline grade) to Grade 2 (CTCAE grade)INR increased: Grade 0 (baseline grade) to Grade 3 (CTCAE grade)INR increased: Grade 1 (baseline grade) to Grade 0 (CTCAE grade)INR increased: Grade 1 (baseline grade) to Grade 1 (CTCAE grade)INR increased: Grade 1 (baseline grade) to Grade 2 (CTCAE grade)INR increased: Grade 1 (baseline grade) to Grade 3 (CTCAE grade)
Intensive Study: Glasdegib + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin100101110101100011
Intensive Study: Placebo + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin014210111020111310

[back to top]

Non-intensive Study: Time to Response

TTRi:Participants who achieved CRi or better, as the time from date of randomization to first documentation of response(CRi or better).TTRh:Participants who achieved CRh or better, as the time from date of randomization to first documentation of response(CRh or better). CRi:not qualifying for CR, neutrophil<0.5*10^9/L or platelets<50*10^9, absence of extramedullary disease,absence of blasts with Auer rods. CR was defined based on 2017 ELN recommendations. CR: Bone marrow blasts <5 %; absence of circulating blasts and blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; ANC >=1.0*10^9/L; platelet count >=100*10^9/L. CRh: MRD (positive or unknown); bone marrow blasts <5%; assessed in non-intensive chemotherapy study only, not qualifying for CR, ie, both neutrophil >=0.5*10^9/L and platelets >=50*10^9/L must be met, but does not satisfy both neutrophils >=1*10^9/L and platelets >=100*10^9/L at the same time; absence of extramedullary disease; and absence of blasts with Auer rods. (NCT03416179)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the first documentation of response (CRi/CRh or better) (maximum up to 3 years)

,
InterventionMonths (Mean)
TTRiTTRh
Non-intensive Study: Glasdegib + Azacitidine4.0574.334
Non-intensive Study: Placebo + Azacitidine4.0934.146

[back to top]

Non-intensive Study: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Glasdegib

Ctrough of Glasdegib was measured in ng/mL. (NCT03416179)
Timeframe: Pre-dose: Cycle 1 Day 15 and Cycle 2 Day 1

Interventionng/ml (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 15Cycle 2 Day 1
Non-intensive Study: Glasdegib + Azacitidine565.44472.42

[back to top] [back to top]

Non-intensive Study: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematological Laboratory Abnormalities Graded by NCI CTCAE v.4.03

Hematology laboratory test included: anemia, hemoglobin increased, INR increased, lymphocyte count decreased, lymphocyte count increased, neutrophil count decreased, platelet count decreased, and white blood cell decreased. Laboratory results were categorically summarized according to the NCI-CTCAE criteria v4.03. Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe and Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling. Number of participants with shift from baseline for hematology laboratory test were assessed. Only those laboratory test parameters in which at least 1 participant had data were reported. (NCT03416179)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to maximum of 3 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Anemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Anemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Anemia: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Anemia: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hemoglobin increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hemoglobin increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Lymphocyte count decreased: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Lymphocyte count decreased: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Lymphocyte count increased: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Lymphocyte count increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Lymphocyte count increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Lymphocyte count increased: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Neutrophil count decreased: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Neutrophil count decreased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Neutrophil count decreased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Platelet count decreased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Platelet count decreased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Platelet count decreased: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Platelet count decreased: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)White blood cell decreased: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)White blood cell decreased: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)White blood cell decreased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)White blood cell decreased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)White blood cell decreased: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)White blood cell decreased: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)
Non-intensive Study: Glasdegib + Azacitidine2997529160021965127314772413482922155183114370045
Non-intensive Study: Placebo + Azacitidine41871311591008954413015730022401972864068004862148

[back to top]

Non-intensive Study: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Corrected QT (QTc) Interval

Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The time corresponding to beginning of depolarization to repolarization of the ventricles (QT interval) was adjusted for RR interval using QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR) and by Bazette's formula (QTcB = QT divided by square root of RR). Participants with maximum increase from baseline of <=450 to >500 msec (post-baseline) were summarized. Number of participants with shift from baseline for QTc were assessed. Only those QTc parameters in which at least 1 participant had data were reported. (NCT03416179)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to maximum of 3 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
QTcB: <=450 msec (baseline) to <=450 msec (post-baseline)QTcB: <=450 msec (baseline) to >450-<=480 msec (post-baseline)QTcB: <=450 msec (baseline) to >480-<=500 msec (post-baseline)QTcB: <=450 msec (baseline) to >500 msec (post-baseline)QTcB: >450-<=480 msec (baseline) to <=450 msec (post-baseline)QTcB: >450-<=480 msec (baseline) to >450-<=480 msec (post-baseline)QTcB: >450-<=480 msec (baseline) to >480-<=500 msec (post-baseline)QTcB: >450-<=480 msec (baseline) to >500 msec (post-baseline)QTcB: >480-<=500 msec (baseline) to >450-<=480 msec (post-baseline)QTcB: >480-<=500 msec (baseline) to >480-<=500 msec (post-baseline)QTcB: >480-<=500 msec (baseline) to >500 msec (post-baseline)QTcF: <=450 msec (baseline) to <=450 msec (post-baseline)QTcF: <=450 msec (baseline) to >450-<=480 msec (post-baseline)QTcF: <=450 msec (baseline) to >480-<=500 msec (post-baseline)QTcF: >450 - <=480 (baseline) to <=450msec (post-baseline)QTcF: >450 - <=480 msec (baseline) to >450 - <=480msec(post baseline)QTcF: >450 - <=480 msec (baseline) to >480 - <=500 msec (post baseline)QTcF: >480 msec (baseline) to <=500 msec (post baseline)QTcF: >450 - <=480 (baseline) to >500 msec (post baseline)QTcF: >480 - <=500msec (baseline) to >480 - <=500 msec (post baseline)
Non-intensive Study: Glasdegib + Azacitidine485367020135132100397105111
Non-intensive Study: Placebo + Azacitidine584311312283213104360118410

[back to top]

Non-intensive Study: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Coagulation Laboratory Abnormalities Graded by NCI CTCAE v.4.03

Coagulation laboratory test included: activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged, and INR increased. Laboratory results were categorically summarized according to the NCI-CTCAE criteria v4.03. Grade 0= no abnormality; Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe and Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling. Number of participants with shift from baseline for coagulation were assessed. Only those laboratory test parameters in which at least 1 participant had data were reported. (NCT03416179)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to maximum of 3 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade 0 (CTCAE grade)Activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged: Grade 0 (baseline grade) to Grade 0 (CTCAE grade)Activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged: Grade 0 (baseline grade) to Grade 1 (CTCAE grade)Activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged: Grade 1 (baseline grade) to Grade 0 (CTCAE grade)Activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged: Grade 1 (baseline grade) to Grade 1 (CTCAE grade)Activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged: Grade 2 (baseline grade) to Grade 1 (CTCAE grade)INR increased: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade 0 (CTCAE grade)INR increased: Grade 0 (baseline grade) to Grade 0 (CTCAE grade)INR increased: Grade 0 (baseline grade) to Grade 1 (CTCAE grade)INR increased: Grade 0 (baseline grade) to Grade 2 (CTCAE grade)INR increased: Grade 0 (baseline grade) to Grade 3 (CTCAE grade)INR increased: Grade 1 (baseline grade) to Grade 1 (CTCAE grade)INR increased: Grade 1 (baseline grade) to Grade 2 (CTCAE grade)INR increased: Grade 3 (baseline grade) to Grade 1 (CTCAE grade)
Non-intensive Study: Glasdegib + Azacitidine18511114611121
Non-intensive Study: Placebo + Azacitidine05700005420101

[back to top]

Non-intensive Study: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities Graded by NCI CTCAE v.4.03

Chemistry laboratory test included: alanine aminotransferase increased, alkaline phosphatase increased, aspartate aminotransferase increased, blood bilirubin increased, chronic kidney disease, CPK increased, creatinine increased, GGT increased, hypercalcemia, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypermagnesemia, hypernatremia, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hyponatremia, and hypophosphatemia. Laboratory results were categorically summarized according to the NCI-CTCAE criteria v4.03. Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe and Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling. Number of participants with shift from baseline for chemistry laboratory test were assessed. Only those laboratory test parameters in which at least 1 participant had data were reported. (NCT03416179)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to maximum of 3 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Alanine aminotransferase increased: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Alanine aminotransferase increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Alanine aminotransferase increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Alanine aminotransferase increased: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Alkaline phosphatase increased: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Alkaline phosphatase increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Alkaline phosphatase increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Aspartate aminotransferase increased: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Aspartate aminotransferase increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Aspartate aminotransferase increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Blood bilirubin increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Blood bilirubin increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Chronic kidney disease: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Chronic kidney disease: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Chronic kidney disease: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Chronic kidney disease: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)CPK increased: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)CPK increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)CPK increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Creatinine increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Creatinine increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)GGT increased: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)GGT increased: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)GGT increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypercalcemia: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypercalcemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hyperglycemia: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hyperglycemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hyperglycemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hyperglycemia: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hyperkalemia: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hyperkalemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hyperkalemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hyperkalemia: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hyperkalemia: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hypermagnesemia: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypermagnesemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypermagnesemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hypernatremia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypernatremia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hypoalbuminemia: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypoalbuminemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypoalbuminemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hypocalcemia: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypocalcemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypocalcemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hypocalcemia: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hypoglycemia: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypoglycemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypoglycemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hypokalemia: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypokalemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypokalemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hypokalemia: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypokalemia: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hypomagnesemia: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypomagnesemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypomagnesemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hypomagnesemia: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hyponatremia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hyponatremia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hyponatremia: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hyponatremia: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hypophosphatemia: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypophosphatemia: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hypophosphatemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypophosphatemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE gradeHypophosphatemia: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypophosphatemia: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)
Non-intensive Study: Glasdegib + Azacitidine215260015903152415732130280914711537341215621478221552002155215822151621541021553212923142151601352401311411201
Non-intensive Study: Placebo + Azacitidine0154601157101564159111342328147215555302158413614201573004154215910157321553041560013915244153211421512201381712

[back to top]

Intensive Study: Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Glasdegib

Ctrough of Glasdegib was measured in nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL). (NCT03416179)
Timeframe: Induction, Day 10+/-1: pre-dose, 1, 4 hour (hr); Consolidation phase, Day 1: pre-dose, 1, 4 hr

Interventionng/ml (Geometric Mean)
Induction Day 10Consolidation 1, Day 1Consolidation 2, Day 1
Intensive Study: Glasdegib + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin413.54245.48259.79

[back to top]

Intensive Study: Percentage of Participants With Partial Remission (PR)

PR was defined based on 2017 ELN recommendations. PR: MRD (positive or unknown); bone marrow blasts - decrease to 5-25% and decrease of pre-treatment bone marrow blast percentage by at least 50%; neutrophil count >=1.0*10^9/L; and platelets count >=100*10^9/L. (NCT03416179)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to maximum of 2 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Intensive Study: Glasdegib + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin5.0
Intensive Study: Placebo + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin4.4

[back to top]

Non-intensive Study: Percentage of Participants With Partial Remission (PR)

PR was defined based on 2017 ELN recommendations. PR: MRD (positive or unknown); bone marrow blasts - decrease to 5-25% and decrease of pre-treatment bone marrow blast percentage by at least 50%; neutrophil count >=1.0*10^9/L; and platelets count >=100*10^9/L. (NCT03416179)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to maximum of 3 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Non-intensive Study: Glasdegib + Azacitidine2.5
Non-intensive Study: Placebo + Azacitidine4.9

[back to top]

Non-intensive Study: Percentage of Participants Who Improved in Fatigue Score Measured by the MDASI-AML/MDS Questionnaire at Week 12

"MDASI-AML/MDS: consists of 23 items, 13-item core cancer symptoms (pain, fatigue, nausea, disturbed sleep, distress, shortness of breath, problem remembering, lack of appetite, drowsiness, dry mouth, sadness, vomiting, and numbness), 4-item AML/MDS specific symptoms (malaise, diarrhea, muscle weakness, and skin problems), and 6 areas of interference (general activity, mood, work, walking, relations with other people, and enjoyment of life). Fatigue was measured at the participants' worst level in last 24 hours by asking participants to respond to each item on an 0-10 NRS, where 0 = not present and 10 = as bad as you can imagine. Percentage of participants who had improvement in fatigue symptoms reported in this outcome measure." (NCT03416179)
Timeframe: Post-baseline up to Week 12

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Non-intensive Study: Glasdegib + Azacitidine11.66
Non-intensive Study: Placebo + Azacitidine15.43

[back to top]

Intensive Study: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities Graded by NCI CTCAE v.4.03

Chemistry laboratory test included: alanine aminotransferase increased, alkaline phosphatase increased, aspartate aminotransferase increased, blood bilirubin increased, chronic kidney disease, creatine phosphokinase (CPK) increased, creatinine increased, gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) increased, hypercalcemia, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypermagnesemia, hypernatremia, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hyponatremia, and hypophosphatemia. Laboratory results were categorically summarized according to the NCI-CTCAE criteria v4.03. Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe and Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling. Number of participants with shift from baseline for chemistry laboratory test were assessed. Only those laboratory test parameters in which at least 1 participant had data were reported. (NCT03416179)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to maximum of 2 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Alanine aminotransferase increased: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Alanine aminotransferase increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Alanine aminotransferase increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Alanine aminotransferase increased: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Alkaline phosphatase increased: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Alkaline phosphatase increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Alkaline phosphatase increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Aspartate aminotransferase increased: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Aspartate aminotransferase increased: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Aspartate aminotransferase increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Aspartate aminotransferase increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Blood bilirubin increased: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Blood bilirubin increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Blood bilirubin increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Blood bilirubin increased: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Chronic kidney disease: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Chronic kidney disease: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Chronic kidney disease: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Chronic kidney disease: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Chronic kidney disease: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)CPK increased: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)CPK increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)CPK increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Creatinine increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Creatinine increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)GGT increased: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)GGT increased: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)GGT increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hypercalcemia: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypercalcemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hyperglycemia: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hyperglycemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hyperglycemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hyperglycemia: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hyperglycemia: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hyperkalemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hyperkalemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hyperkalemia: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypermagnesemia: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypermagnesemia: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hypermagnesemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypermagnesemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hypermagnesemia: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypernatremia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypernatremia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hypernatremia: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypoalbuminemia: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypoalbuminemia: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hypoalbuminemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypoalbuminemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hypocalcemia: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypocalcemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypocalcemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hypoglycemia: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypoglycemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypoglycemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hypokalemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypokalemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hypokalemia: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypomagnesemia: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypomagnesemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypomagnesemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hyponatremia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hyponatremia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hyponatremia: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hyponatremia: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hypophosphatemia: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypophosphatemia: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hypophosphatemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypophosphatemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE gradeHypophosphatemia: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hypophosphatemia: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)
Intensive Study: Glasdegib + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin1175161218725017315018480418281020161218875801191117415221942020190101960001185511190111930155410219011771711311533303
Intensive Study: Placebo + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin118413031923211869318951518840119166019267112519231831011194314118421196113118581518933194115937251870188811311533321

[back to top]

Intensive Study: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs),Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and According to Severity AEs Graded by NCI CTCAE v.4.03

AE: any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE: any AE, regardless of dose, that led to death; was life-threatening; required hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization; led to persistent or significant incapacity or led to congenital anomaly or birth defect. AEs included SAEs and all non-SAEs. NCI CTCAE v.4.03, Grade 3=severe adverse event, Grade 4= life threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated, Grade 5= death related to adverse event. (NCT03416179)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to maximum of 2 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AEsSAEsGrade 3 or 4 AEGrade 5 AE
Intensive Study: Glasdegib + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin1968617316
Intensive Study: Placebo + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin1989216920

[back to top]

Intensive Study: Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission Including Negative Minimal Residual Disease (CRMRD-neg)

CR was defined based on 2017 ELN recommendations. CR: Bone marrow blasts <5%; absence of circulating blasts and blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; ANC >=1.0*10^9/L; platelet count >=100*10^9/L. CRMRDneg: CR with negativity for a genetic marker by RT-qPCR, or CR with negativity by MFC. (NCT03416179)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to maximum of 2 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Intensive Study: Glasdegib + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin49.3
Intensive Study: Placebo + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin47.3

[back to top]

Non-intensive Study: Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR) Including Negative Minimal Residual Disease (CRMRD-neg)

CR was defined based on 2017 ELN recommendations. CR: Bone marrow blasts <5%; absence of circulating blasts and blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; ANC >=1.0*10^9/L; platelet count >=100*10^9/L. CRMRDneg: CR with negativity for a genetic marker by RT-qPCR, or CR with negativity by MFC. (NCT03416179)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to maximum of 3 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Non-intensive Study: Glasdegib + Azacitidine19.6
Non-intensive Study: Placebo + Azacitidine13.0

[back to top]

Non-intensive Study: Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission With Incomplete Hematologic Recovery (CRi)

CR was defined based on 2017 ELN recommendations. CR: MRD (positive or unknown), bone marrow blasts <5%; absence of circulating blasts and blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; ANC <1.0*10^9/L; platelet count <100 × 10^9/L. CRi (included CR [includes CRMRD-neg]): not qualifying for CR, neutrophil <0.5*10^9/L or platelets <50*10^9, absence of extramedullary disease, and absence of blasts with Auer rods. (NCT03416179)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to maximum of 3 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Non-intensive Study: Glasdegib + Azacitidine2.5
Non-intensive Study: Placebo + Azacitidine4.9

[back to top]

Non-intensive Study: Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission With Partial Hematologic Recovery (CRh)

CRh: MRD (positive or unknown); bone marrow blasts <5%; assessed in non-intensive chemotherapy study only, not qualifying for CR, ie, both neutrophil >=0.5*10^9/L and platelets >=50*10^9/L must be met, but does not satisfy both neutrophils >=1*10^9/L and platelets >=100*10^9/L at the same time; absence of extramedullary disease; and absence of blasts with Auer rods. (NCT03416179)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to maximum of 3 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Non-intensive Study: Glasdegib + Azacitidine3.1
Non-intensive Study: Placebo + Azacitidine3.1

[back to top]

Non-intensive Study: Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission Without Negative Minimal Residual Disease (CRMRD-neg)

CR was defined based on 2017 ELN recommendations. CR: Bone marrow blasts <5%; absence of circulating blasts and blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; ANC >=1.0*10^9/L; platelet count >=100*10^9/L. CRMRDneg: CR with negativity for a genetic marker by RT-qPCR, or CR with negativity by MFC. (NCT03416179)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to maximum of 3 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Non-intensive Study: Glasdegib + Azacitidine1.8
Non-intensive Study: Placebo + Azacitidine0.6

[back to top]

Non-intensive Study: Overall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants last known to be alive were to be censored at the date of last contact. (NCT03416179)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 25 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Non-intensive Study: Glasdegib + Azacitidine10.3
Non-intensive Study: Placebo + Azacitidine10.6

[back to top]

Intensive Study: Percentage of Participants Who Improved in Fatigue Score Measured by the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory -Acute Myelogenous Leukemia/Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDASI-AML/MDS) Questionnaire

"MDASI-AML/MDS: consists of 23 items, 13-item core cancer symptoms (pain, fatigue, nausea, disturbed sleep, distress, shortness of breath, problem remembering, lack of appetite, drowsiness, dry mouth, sadness, vomiting, and numbness), 4-item AML/MDS specific symptoms (malaise, diarrhea, muscle weakness, and skin problems), and 6 areas of interference (general activity, mood, work, walking, relations with other people, and enjoyment of life). Fatigue was measured at the participants' worst level in last 24 hours by asking participants to respond to each item on an 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS), where 0 = not present and 10 = as bad as you can imagine. Percentage of participants who had improvement in fatigue symptoms reported in this outcome measure." (NCT03416179)
Timeframe: Post-baseline up to Week 8

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Intensive Study: Glasdegib + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin17.41
Intensive Study: Placebo + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin17.24

[back to top]

Intensive Study: Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission With Incomplete Hematologic Recovery (CRi)

CR was defined based on 2017 ELN recommendations. CR: MRD (positive or unknown), bone marrow blasts <5%; absence of circulating blasts and blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; ANC less than (<) 1.0*10^9/L; platelet count <100 × 10^9/L. CRi (included CR [includes CRMRD-neg]): not qualifying for CR, neutropenia <1.0*10^9/L or platelets <100*10^9, absence of extramedullary disease, and absence of blasts with Auer rods. (NCT03416179)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to maximum of 2 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Intensive Study: Glasdegib + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin1.5
Intensive Study: Placebo + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin5.4

[back to top]

Non-intensive Study: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs),Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and According to Severity AEs Graded by NCI CTCAE v.4.03

AE: any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE: any AE, regardless of dose, that led to death; was life-threatening; required hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization; led to persistent or significant incapacity or led to congenital anomaly or birth defect. AEs included SAEs and all non-SAEs. NCI CTCAE v.4.03, Grade 3=severe adverse event, Grade 4= life threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated, Grade 5= death related to adverse event. (NCT03416179)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to maximum of 3 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AEsSAEsGrade 3 or 4 AEGrade 5 AE
Non-intensive Study: Glasdegib + Azacitidine16111710650
Non-intensive Study: Placebo + Azacitidine15812410052

[back to top] [back to top]

Intensive Study: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Hematological Laboratory Abnormalities Graded by NCI CTCAE v.4.03

Hematology laboratory test included: anemia, hemoglobin increased, international normalized ratio (INR) increased, lymphocyte count decreased, lymphocyte count increased, neutrophil count decreased, platelet count decreased, and white blood cell decreased. Laboratory results were categorically summarized according to the NCI-CTCAE criteria v4.03. Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe and Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling. Number of participants with shift from baseline for hematology laboratory test were assessed. Only those laboratory test parameters in which at least 1 participant had data were reported. (NCT03416179)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to maximum of 2 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Anemia: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Anemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Anemia: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Anemia: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Anemia: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Hemoglobin increased: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hemoglobin increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Hemoglobin increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)INR increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Lymphocyte count decreased: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Lymphocyte count decreased: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Lymphocyte count increased: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Lymphocyte count increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Lymphocyte count increased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Lymphocyte count increased: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Lymphocyte count increased: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Neutrophil count decreased: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Neutrophil count decreased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Neutrophil count decreased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Platelet count decreased: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Platelet count decreased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)Platelet count decreased: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)White blood cell decreased: Missing (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)White blood cell decreased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade <=2 (CTCAE grade)White blood cell decreased: Grade <=2 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)White blood cell decreased: Grade 3/4 (baseline grade) to Grade 3/4 (CTCAE grade)
Intensive Study: Glasdegib + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin0271134520194230021160111018561104850105198971315537
Intensive Study: Placebo + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin2141035732194112426152096180430427921062100954215635

[back to top]

Intensive Study: Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Corrected QT (QTc) Interval

Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The time corresponding to beginning of depolarization to repolarization of the ventricles (QT interval) was adjusted for RR interval using QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR) and by Bazette's formula (QTcB = QT divided by square root of RR). Participants with maximum increase from baseline of <=450 to >500 msec (post-baseline) were summarized. Number of participants with shift from baseline for QTc were assessed. Only those QTc parameters in which at least 1 participant had data were reported. (NCT03416179)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to maximum of 2 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
QTcB: <=450 msec (baseline) to <=450 msec (post-baseline)QTcB: <=450 msec (baseline) to >450-<=480 msec (post-baseline)QTcB: <=450 msec (baseline) to >480-<=500 msec (post-baseline)QTcB: <=450 msec (baseline) to >500 msec (post-baseline)QTcB: >450-<=480 msec (baseline) to <=450 msec (post-baseline)QTcB: >450-<=480 msec (baseline) to >450-<=480 msec (post-baseline)QTcB: >450-<=480 msec (baseline) to >480-<=500 msec (post-baseline)QTcB: >450-<=480 msec (baseline) to >500 msec (post-baseline)QTcB: >480-<=500 msec (baseline) to >450-<=480 msec (post-baseline)QTcB: >480-<=500 msec (baseline) to >480-<=500 msec (post-baseline)QTcB: >480-<=500 msec (baseline) to >500 msec (post-baseline)QTcB: >500 msec (baseline) to >500 msec (post-baseline)QTcF: <=450 msec (baseline) to <=450 msec (post-baseline)QTcF: <=450 msec (baseline) to >450-<=480 msec (post-baseline)QTcF: <=450 msec (baseline) to >480-<=500 msec (post-baseline)QTcF: <=450 msec (baseline) to >500 msec (post-baseline)QTcF: >450-<=480 msec (baseline) to <=450 msec (post-baseline)QTcF: >450-<=480 msec (baseline) to >450-<=480 msec (post-baseline)QTcF: >450-<=480 msec (baseline) to >500 msec (post-baseline)QTcF: >480-<=500 msec (baseline) to >480-<=500 msec (post-baseline)
Intensive Study: Glasdegib + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin51641811220161121111650852510
Intensive Study: Placebo + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin71631163171050101132391001511

[back to top]

Intensive Study: Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission Without Negative Minimal Residual Disease (CRMRD-neg)

Complete remission (CR) was defined based on 2017 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations. CR: Bone marrow blasts <5 percentage (%); absence of circulating blasts and blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than equal to (>=) 1.0*10^9/Liter (L); platelet count >=100*10^9/L. CRMRD-neg: CR with negativity for a genetic marker by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), or CR with negativity by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry (MFC). (NCT03416179)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to maximum of 2 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Intensive Study: Glasdegib + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin5.0
Intensive Study: Placebo + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin5.4

[back to top]

Intensive Study: Percentage of Participants With Morphologic Leukemia-free State (MLFS)

MLFS was defined based on 2017 ELN recommendations. MLFS: MRD (positive or unknown), bone marrow blasts <5%, no hematologic recovery required, marrow should not be aplastic, at least 200 cells enumerated or cellularity absence of extramedullary disease >=10%, and absence of blasts with Auer rods. (NCT03416179)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to maximum of 2 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Intensive Study: Glasdegib + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin1.5
Intensive Study: Placebo + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin2.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced a Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT)

DLTs were defined as specific adverse events (AEs) that occurred in a participant during the DLT evaluation period (Day 1 to Day 28), that the investigator assessed as related to AMG 397. The grading and severity of AEs were based on the guidelines provided in the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 4.03. (NCT03465540)
Timeframe: 28 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Part 1a: 80 mg AMG 3970
Part 1a: 160 mg AMG 3970
Part 1a: 320 mg AMG 3971
Part 1b: 80 mg AMG 3970
Part 1b: 160 mg AMG 3970
Part 1b: 320 mg AMG 3971

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

"PFS was calculated as time from first dose of investigational product date to disease progression date or death due to any cause, whichever was earlier.~PFS time in months: (date of disease progression or death - first dose date +1)/30.4." (NCT03465540)
Timeframe: Up to end of study (a maximum of 48 weeks)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Part 1a: 80 mg AMG 397NA
Part 1a: 160 mg AMG 397NA
Part 1a: 320 mg AMG 397NA
Part 1b: 80 mg AMG 397NA
Part 1b: 160 mg AMG 397NA
Part 1b: 320 mg AMG 397NA

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to 168 Hours (AUC0-168) for AMG 397

(NCT03465540)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (cycle = 28 days): Predose, 3, 5, & 8 hours postdose on days 1 (12 hours postdose on Day 1 only), 8 & 15, predose & 8 hours postdose on Day 22 & days 2, 3, 4, 9, 16, 17, 18 & 23; Cycles 2, 3 & 4 (cycle = 28 days): Predose on days 2, 8, 15 & 22

Interventionhr*µg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Part 1a: 80 mg AMG 397635
Part 1a: 160 mg AMG 397115
Part 1a: 320 mg AMG 397230
Part 1b: 80 mg AMG 397108
Part 1b: 160 mg AMG 397264
Part 1b: 320 mg AMG 397227

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) for Participants With Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL)

"ORR was assessed for participants with NHL using response criteria per Lugano Classification.~ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who experienced either of the following based on investigator assessment:~partial metabolic response/ PR~complete metabolic response/ CR" (NCT03465540)
Timeframe: Up to end of study (a maximum of 48 weeks)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Part 1a: Participants With NHL - 80 mg AMG 397100.0
Part 1a: Participants With NHL - 160 mg AMG 3970.0

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

"OS was defined as the time from first dose of investigational product date until death due to any cause.~OS time in months: (date of death - first dose date +1)/30.4." (NCT03465540)
Timeframe: Up to end of study (a maximum of 48 weeks)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Part 1a: 80 mg AMG 397NA
Part 1a: 160 mg AMG 397NA
Part 1a: 320 mg AMG 397NA
Part 1b: 80 mg AMG 397NA
Part 1b: 160 mg AMG 397NA
Part 1b: 320 mg AMG 397NA

[back to top]

Time to Response (TTR)

"TTR was defined as the time from the first dose of investigational product until the first documentation of objective response. Only participants who achieved an objective response were evaluated for TTR.~TTR time in months: (date of the first observation of response - first dose of IP date +1)/30.4." (NCT03465540)
Timeframe: Up to end of study (a maximum of 48 weeks)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Part 1a: 80 mg AMG 397NA
Part 1a: 160 mg AMG 397NA
Part 1a: 320 mg AMG 397NA
Part 1b: 80 mg AMG 397NA
Part 1b: 160 mg AMG 397NA
Part 1b: 320 mg AMG 397NA

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR)

"DOR was only planned to be calculated for participants who achieved response (PR or better). DOR was defined as time from the first observation indicating a response to the subsequent date of disease progression or death, whichever was earlier.~DOR time in months: (date of disease progression or death - date of the first observation of response +1)/30.4." (NCT03465540)
Timeframe: Up to end of study (a maximum of 48 weeks)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Part 1a: 80 mg AMG 397NA
Part 1a: 160 mg AMG 397NA
Part 1a: 320 mg AMG 397NA
Part 1b: 80 mg AMG 397NA
Part 1b: 160 mg AMG 397NA
Part 1b: 320 mg AMG 397NA

[back to top]

Clearance (CL) of AMG 397

(NCT03465540)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (cycle = 28 days): Predose, 3, 5, & 8 hours postdose on days 1 (12 hours postdose on Day 1 only), 8 & 15, predose & 8 hours postdose on Day 22 & days 2, 3, 4, 9, 16, 17, 18 & 23; Cycles 2, 3 & 4 (cycle = 28 days): Predose on days 2, 8, 15 & 22

InterventionL/hr (Geometric Mean)
Part 1a: 80 mg AMG 3971.08
Part 1a: 160 mg AMG 3971.17
Part 1a: 320 mg AMG 3971.02
Part 1b: 80 mg AMG 3970.449
Part 1b: 160 mg AMG 3970.563
Part 1b: 320 mg AMG 3970.320

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) for Participants With Multiple Myeloma (MM)

"ORR was assessed for participants with MM using response criteria per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG).~ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who experienced either one of the following based on investigator assessment:~partial response (PR)~very good partial response (VGPR)~complete response (CR)~stringent complete response (sCR)" (NCT03465540)
Timeframe: Up to end of study (a maximum of 48 weeks)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Part 1a: 80 mg AMG 3970.0
Part 1a: 160 mg AMG 3970.0
Part 1a: 320 mg AMG 3970.0

[back to top]

Half-life (t1/2) of AMG 397

(NCT03465540)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (cycle = 28 days): Predose, 3, 5, & 8 hours postdose on days 1 (12 hours postdose on Day 1 only), 8 & 15, predose & 8 hours postdose on Day 22 & days 2, 3, 4, 9, 16, 17, 18 & 23; Cycles 2, 3 & 4 (cycle = 28 days): Predose on days 2, 8, 15 & 22

Interventionhours (Geometric Mean)
Part 1a: 80 mg AMG 39760.1
Part 1a: 160 mg AMG 39749.7
Part 1a: 320 mg AMG 39776.9
Part 1b: 80 mg AMG 39796.3
Part 1b: 160 mg AMG 39753.4
Part 1b: 320 mg AMG 397109

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced a Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)

A TEAE was defined as any AE starting on or after the first dose of investigational product. Any clinically significant changes in vital signs, physical examinations, electrocardiogram (ECGs) and clinical laboratory test results were recorded as AEs. The grading and severity of adverse events were based on the guidelines provided in the CTCAE version 4.03. Treatment-related TEAEs were any events that the investigator assessed as related to AMG 397. (NCT03465540)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days after last dose (Maximum time on treatment was 18 weeks for part 1a and 13 weeks for part 1b)

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TEAEsTreatment-related TEAEs
Part 1a: 160 mg AMG 39766
Part 1a: 320 mg AMG 39744
Part 1a: 80 mg AMG 39722
Part 1b: 160 mg AMG 39754
Part 1b: 320 mg AMG 39733
Part 1b: 80 mg AMG 39742

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of AMG 397

Predose data for Day 2 were analyzed/included with the Day 1 data. (NCT03465540)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (cycle = 28 days): Predose, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8 & 12 hours postdose on Day 1; predose, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 12, 24 & 48 hours postdose on Day 2

,,,,,
Interventionµg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 2
Part 1a: 160 mg AMG 3970.4681.80
Part 1a: 320 mg AMG 3970.9082.822
Part 1a: 80 mg AMG 3970.4151.17
Part 1b: 160 mg AMG 3971.313.69
Part 1b: 320 mg AMG 3972.514.57
Part 1b: 80 mg AMG 3970.7471.41

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) for Participants With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

"ORR was assessed for participants with AML using response criteria per European Leukemia Network Response Criteria.~ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who experienced either of the following based on investigator assessment:~PR~morphological leukemia-free state (MLFS)~complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi)~complete remission~complete remission without minimal residual disease (CRmrd-)." (NCT03465540)
Timeframe: Up to end of study (a maximum of 48 weeks)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Part 1b: 80 mg AMG 3970.0
Part 1b: 160 mg AMG 3970.0
Part 1b: 320 mg AMG 3970.0

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) for AMG 397

Predose data for Day 2 were analyzed/included with the Day 1 data. (NCT03465540)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (cycle = 28 days): Predose, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8 & 12 hours postdose on Day 1; predose, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 12, 24 & 48 hours postdose on Day 2

,,,,,
InterventionHours (Median)
Day 1Day 2
Part 1a: 160 mg AMG 397188.3
Part 1a: 320 mg AMG 3978.17.9
Part 1a: 80 mg AMG 397124
Part 1b: 160 mg AMG 397217.2
Part 1b: 320 mg AMG 397128.1
Part 1b: 80 mg AMG 397126.6

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Overall Survival

"Overall Survival (OS) assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The Kaplan-Meier overall survival estimate at 2 years (with 95% confidence interval) is reported.~OS defined as the time from first treatment day until death (or until last follow-up if alive)." (NCT03542266)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CC486 +CHOP68.0

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Progression-Free Survival

"Progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The Kaplan-Meier progression-free survival estimate at 2 years (with 95% confidence interval) is reported.~PFS defined as the time from first treatment day until objective or symptomatic progression or death (or date of last follow-up if no progression/death)." (NCT03542266)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CC486 +CHOP65.8

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate

Complete response rate (CR) of CC486-CHOP in PTCL by Lugano Criteria for target lesions, and the Deauville Criteria (5 point scale) assessed by PET or CT; CR (complete metabolic or radiologic response) defined as Deauville score of 1, 2 or 3 by PET or regression of all target lesions to < 1.5cm in longest diameter by CT. (NCT03542266)
Timeframe: After Cycle 6 at 18 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CC486 +CHOP75

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events

Assessment of safety of alvocidib administered in combination with either decitabine (DEC) or azacitidine (AZA) by reporting of adverse events and serious adverse events (NCT03593915)
Timeframe: From the time of first dose to 30 days after the last dose, an average of 33.7 weeks.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ALV-DEC: Cohort 13
ALV-DEC: Cohort 23
ALV-DEC: Cohort 33
ALV-DEC: Cohort 44
ALV-AZA: Cohort 53
ALV-AZA: Cohort 64

[back to top]

Part 1: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC[0-inf]) of GSK3326595 Following Administration of Single Dose

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of GSK3326595. (NCT03614728)
Timeframe: Day 1:Pre-dose(within 1 hour prior to dosing),5minute(+/-2minute),30minute(+/-5minute),1hour(+/-5minute),2hours(+/-5minute),3hours(+/-5minute),4hours(+/-10minute),6hours(+/-10minute),8hours(+/-15minute),12hours(+/-2hour), 24hours(+/-2hour) post-dose

InterventionHours*nanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Part 1: GSK3326595 400 mg7128.4358
Part 1: GSK3326595 300 mg6572.8527

[back to top]

Part 1: Area Under Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero (Pre-dose) to Last Time of Quantifiable Concentration Within Participant Across All Treatments (AUC[0-t]) of GSK3326595 Following Administration of Single Dose

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of GSK3326595. (NCT03614728)
Timeframe: Day 1:Pre-dose(within 1 hour prior to dosing),5minute(+/-2minute),30minute(+/-5minute),1hour(+/-5minute),2hours(+/-5minute),3hours(+/-5minute),4hours(+/-10minute),6hours(+/-10minute),8hours(+/-15minute),12hours(+/-2hour), 24hours(+/-2hour) post-dose

InterventionHours*nanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Part 1: GSK3326595 400 mg6667.4570
Part 1: GSK3326595 300 mg5189.2734

[back to top]

Part 1: Apparent Terminal Phase Half-life (t1/2) of GSK3326595 Following Administration of Single Dose

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of GSK3326595. (NCT03614728)
Timeframe: Day 1:Pre-dose(within 1 hour prior to dosing),5minute(+/-2minute),30minute(+/-5minute),1hour(+/-5minute),2hours(+/-5minute),3hours(+/-5minute),4hours(+/-10minute),6hours(+/-10minute),8hours(+/-15minute),12hours(+/-2hour), 24hours(+/-2hour) post-dose

InterventionHours (Geometric Mean)
Part 1: GSK3326595 400 mg5.0755
Part 1: GSK3326595 300 mg6.7688

[back to top]

Part 1: Accumulation Ratio Following Administration of GSK3326595

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of GSK3326595. Accumulation ratio was calculated as the ratio of AUC(0-24) on Day 15 divided by AUC(0-24) on Day 1 for GSK3326595. (NCT03614728)
Timeframe: Days1and15:Pre-dose(within 1hour prior to dosing),5minute(+/-2minute),30minute(+/-5minute),1hour(+/-5minute),2hour(+/-5minute),3hours(+/-5minute),4hours(+/-10minute),6hours(+/-10minute),8hours(+/-15minute),12hours(+/-2hour),24hours(+/-2hour)post-dose

InterventionRatio (Geometric Mean)
Part 1: GSK3326595 400 mg1.3814
Part 1: GSK3326595 300 mg1.0774

[back to top]

Part 1: AUC(0-inf) of GSK3326595 Following Administration of Repeat Dose

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of GSK3326595. (NCT03614728)
Timeframe: Day 15:Pre-dose(within 1 hour prior to dosing),5minute(+/-2minute),30minute(+/-5minute),1hour(+/-5minute),2hours(+/-5minute),3hours(+/-5minute),4hours(+/-10minute),6hours(+/-10minute),8hours(+/-15minute),12hours(+/-2hour), 24hours(+/-2hour) post-dose

InterventionHours*nanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Part 1: GSK3326595 400 mg9202.5641
Part 1: GSK3326595 300 mg6397.0840

[back to top]

Part 1: Number of Participants With AEs by Severity

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. Severity of each AE was reported during the study and was assigned a grade according to the NCI-CTCAE. AEs severity were graded as: Grade 1=mild; Grade 2=moderate; Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4=life-threatening consequences and Grade 5=death related to AE. (NCT03614728)
Timeframe: Up to 30.8 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5
Part 1: GSK3326595 300 mg00665
Part 1: GSK3326595 400 mg01057

[back to top]

Part 1: Progression Free Survival

Progression free survival is defined as time from first dose to disease progression, as defined by IWG criteria, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs earlier. Progressive Disease (PD) is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. (NCT03614728)
Timeframe: Up to 30.8 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Part 1: GSK3326595 400 mg0.99
Part 1: GSK3326595 300 mg0.99

[back to top]

Part 1: Tmax of GSK3326595 Following Administration of Repeat Dose

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of GSK3326595. (NCT03614728)
Timeframe: Day 15:Pre-dose(within 1 hour prior to dosing),5minute(+/-2minute),30minute(+/-5minute),1hour(+/-5minute),2hours(+/-5minute),3hours(+/-5minute),4hours(+/-10minute),6hours(+/-10minute),8hours(+/-15minute),12hours(+/-2hour), 24hours(+/-2hour) post-dose

InterventionHours (Median)
Part 1: GSK3326595 400 mg2.9833
Part 1: GSK3326595 300 mg2.9500

[back to top]

Part 1: Time of Maximum Concentration Observed (Tmax) of GSK3326595 Following Administration of Single Dose

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of GSK3326595. (NCT03614728)
Timeframe: Day 1:Pre-dose(within 1 hour prior to dosing),5minute(+/-2minute),30minute(+/-5minute),1hour(+/-5minute),2hours(+/-5minute),3hours(+/-5minute),4hours(+/-10minute),6hours(+/-10minute),8hours(+/-15minute),12hours(+/-2hour), 24hours(+/-2hour) post-dose

InterventionHours (Median)
Part 1: GSK3326595 400 mg2.0000
Part 1: GSK3326595 300 mg2.1667

[back to top]

Part 1: Time Invariance Following Administration of GSK3326595

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of GSK3326595. Time invariance was calculated as the ratio of AUC(0-24) on Day 15 divided by AUC(0-infinity) on Day 1 for GSK3326595. (NCT03614728)
Timeframe: Days1and15:Pre-dose(within 1hour prior to dosing),5minute(+/-2minute),30minute(+/-5minute),1hour(+/-5minute),2hour(+/-5minute),3hours(+/-5minute),4hours(+/-10minute),6hours(+/-10minute),8hours(+/-15minute),12hours(+/-2hour),24hours(+/-2hour)post-dose

InterventionRatio (Geometric Mean)
Part 1: GSK3326595 400 mg1.3032
Part 1: GSK3326595 300 mg0.9485

[back to top]

Part 1: t1/2 of GSK3326595 Following Administration of Repeat Dose

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of GSK3326595. (NCT03614728)
Timeframe: Day 15:Pre-dose(within 1 hour prior to dosing),5minute(+/-2minute),30minute(+/-5minute),1hour(+/-5minute),2hours(+/-5minute),3hours(+/-5minute),4hours(+/-10minute),6hours(+/-10minute),8hours(+/-15minute),12hours(+/-2hour), 24hours(+/-2hour) post-dose

InterventionHours (Geometric Mean)
Part 1: GSK3326595 400 mg6.2694
Part 1: GSK3326595 300 mg6.8437

[back to top]

Part 1: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)

CBR is defined as the percentage of participants achieving a complete remission (CR), complete marrow remission (mCR), partial remission (PR), stable disease (SD) lasting at least 8 weeks, or hematologic improvement (HI), per International Working Group (IWG) criteria, where CR=Bone marrow:<=5 percent(%) myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines; PR=Bone marrow blasts decreased by >=50% over pre-treatment but still >5%; mCR=Bone marrow: <=5% myeloblasts and decrease by >=50% over pre-treatment; SD= Failure to achieve at least PR, but no evidence of progression >8 weeks; HI=Erythroid (E): hemoglobin increase of >1.5 grams per deciliter (g/dL), HI-Platelet: increase of >30,000/milliliter (mL) (starting with >20,000/mL) and increase from <20,000/mL to >20,000/mL by >100%; HI-Neutrophil: increase of >100% and >500/microliter. Percentage values are rounded off. (NCT03614728)
Timeframe: Up to 30.8 months

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Part 1: GSK3326595 400 mg15
Part 1: GSK3326595 300 mg18

[back to top]

Part 1: Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as time from first dose to death due to any cause. (NCT03614728)
Timeframe: Up to 30.8 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Part 1: GSK3326595 400 mg2.69
Part 1: GSK3326595 300 mg2.96

[back to top]

Part 1: Overall Response Rate

Overall response rate is defined as the percentage of participants achieving a CR, mCR, or PR, per IWG criteria, where CR=Bone marrow: <=5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines; PR=Bone marrow blasts decreased by >=50% over pre-treatment but still >5%; mCR= Bone marrow: ≤ 5% myeloblasts and decrease by >=50% over pre-treatment. Percentage values are rounded off. (NCT03614728)
Timeframe: Up to 30.8 months

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Part 1: GSK3326595 400 mg0
Part 1: GSK3326595 300 mg6

[back to top]

Part 1: Oral Clearance (CL/F) of GSK3326595 Following Administration of Single Dose

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of GSK3326595. (NCT03614728)
Timeframe: Day 1:Pre-dose(within 1 hour prior to dosing),5minute(+/-2minute),30minute(+/-5minute),1hour(+/-5minute),2hours(+/-5minute),3hours(+/-5minute),4hours(+/-10minute),6hours(+/-10minute),8hours(+/-15minute),12hours(+/-2hour), 24hours(+/-2hour) post-dose

InterventionLiter per hour (Geometric Mean)
Part 1: GSK3326595 400 mg56.1133
Part 1: GSK3326595 300 mg45.6423

[back to top]

Part 1: Number of Participants With DLTs

An event is considered to be a DLT if the event occurs within the first 28 days of treatment meeting one of the following criteria of toxicity, Hematologic: Grade 4 or greater treatment-emergent neutropenia, anemia, or thrombocytopenia, lasting for >=14 days in the absence of Investigational Product, that cannot be attributed to underlying disease as described in NCI-CTCAE version 4; Non-hematologic: Hepatic toxicity that meets Liver Stopping Criteria, Grade 3 nausea, vomiting or diarrhea that does not improve within 72 hours despite appropriate supportive treatments, Grade 4 or greater nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea of any duration, Any other Grade 3 or greater clinically significant non-hematologic toxicity; Other: Inability to receive all planned doses, dose interruption and Grade 2 or higher toxicity. (NCT03614728)
Timeframe: Up to 28 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Part 1: GSK3326595 400 mg0
Part 1: GSK3326595 300 mg0

[back to top]

Part 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of GSK3326595 Following Administration of Single Dose

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of GSK3326595. (NCT03614728)
Timeframe: Day 1:Pre-dose(within 1 hour prior to dosing),5minute(+/-2minute),30minute(+/-5minute),1hour(+/-5minute),2hours(+/-5minute),3hours(+/-5minute),4hours(+/-10minute),6hours(+/-10minute),8hours(+/-15minute),12hours(+/-2hour), 24hours(+/-2hour) post-dose

InterventionNanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Part 1: GSK3326595 400 mg1322.8
Part 1: GSK3326595 300 mg960.4

[back to top]

Part 1: Cmax of GSK3326595 Following Administration of Repeat Dose

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of GSK3326595. (NCT03614728)
Timeframe: Day 15:Pre-dose(within 1 hour prior to dosing),5minute(+/-2minute),30minute(+/-5minute),1hour(+/-5minute),2hours(+/-5minute),3hours(+/-5minute),4hours(+/-10minute),6hours(+/-10minute),8hours(+/-15minute),12hours(+/-2hour), 24hours(+/-2hour) post-dose

InterventionNanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Part 1: GSK3326595 400 mg1125.4
Part 1: GSK3326595 300 mg889.7

[back to top]

Part 1: CL/F of GSK3326595 Following Administration of Repeat Dose

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of GSK3326595. (NCT03614728)
Timeframe: Day 15:Pre-dose(within 1 hour prior to dosing),5minute(+/-2minute),30minute(+/-5minute),1hour(+/-5minute),2hours(+/-5minute),3hours(+/-5minute),4hours(+/-10minute),6hours(+/-10minute),8hours(+/-15minute),12hours(+/-2hour), 24hours(+/-2hour) post-dose

InterventionLiter per hour (Geometric Mean)
Part 1: GSK3326595 400 mg47.2832
Part 1: GSK3326595 300 mg51.4710

[back to top]

Part 1: AUC(0-t) of GSK3326595 Following Administration of Repeat Dose

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of GSK3326595. (NCT03614728)
Timeframe: Day 15:Pre-dose(within 1 hour prior to dosing),5minute(+/-2minute),30minute(+/-5minute),1hour(+/-5minute),2hours(+/-5minute),3hours(+/-5minute),4hours(+/-10minute),6hours(+/-10minute),8hours(+/-15minute),12hours(+/-2hour), 24hours(+/-2hour) post-dose

InterventionHours*nanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Part 1: GSK3326595 400 mg5750.5167
Part 1: GSK3326595 300 mg5651.2792

[back to top]

Part 1: Number of Participants With Common Non-STEAEs and STEAEs

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose; results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgement. TEAE is any event that was not present prior to the initiation of study treatment or any event already present that worsens in either intensity or frequency following exposure to study treatment. TEAEs which were not serious, were considered as non-STEAEs. (NCT03614728)
Timeframe: Up to 30.8 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Common non-STEAEsSTEAEs
Part 1: GSK3326595 300 mg1712
Part 1: GSK3326595 400 mg1211

[back to top] [back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

Progression-Free Survival from time of entry on study. Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the first dose to disease progression as determined by applicable disease criteria or death due to any cause, whichever was sooner. Disease progression as measured by the appropriate response criteria, unless deemed by the Investigator to be receiving clinical benefit (NCT03684811)
Timeframe: From time of entry on study through progression, up to 24 weeks, on average

Interventionweeks (Median)
Cohort 1A8.21
Cohort 1B8.29
Cohort 2ANA
Cohort 3A8.57
Cohort 4A8.29
Cohort 5A8.07

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR)

Duration of response (DOR), defined as the time from the first response to documented disease progression as determined by applicable disease criteria. First response is defined as first observation of overall response of CR+PR+MR (glioma) or CR+PR (Cohort 2-5). Disease progression as measured by the appropriate response criteria, unless deemed by the Investigator to be receiving clinical benefit (NCT03684811)
Timeframe: From date of first dose until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 44 weeks

Interventionweeks (Median)
Cohort 1A43.71
Cohort 2ANA

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)

DLTs are AEs unrelated to the underlying disease and considered related to FT-2102. For non-hematologic AEs: Grade 3 or higher per CTCAE v 4.03 criteria except Grade 3 nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, or rash: lasting <72 hours (with optimal medical management) or clinically relevant Grade 3 or higher non-hematologic laboratory finding. For hematologic AEs: Grade 3 or higher thrombocytopenia or febrile neutropenia or Grade 4 or higher neutropenia lasting for >7 days. (NCT03684811)
Timeframe: Day 1-28

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort 1A0
Cohort 1B2
Cohort 3A0
Cohort 5A1

[back to top]

Olutasidenib Concentration Within Cerebro-spinal Fluid (CSF)

Olutasidenib concentration within CSF (Glioma Cohorts 1-A and 1-B only). Due to sparse data, analysis was not conducted by timepoint. (NCT03684811)
Timeframe: CSF sample for drug concentration was collected at Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 3 (each cycle is 28 days) and through study completion, up to 24 weeks, on average.

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cohort 1A27.15

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is defined as the proportion of patients who achieved a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as per RANO (2010) criteria for patients with high grade glioma (Cohorts 1a and 1b). For patients with low grade glioma, ORR is defined as CR+PR+minor response (MR) as per LGG RANO criteria (2011). For Cohorts 2-5, ORR is defined as CR+PR as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 criteria. (NCT03684811)
Timeframe: While on treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort 1A2
Cohort 1B0
Cohort 2A1
Cohort 3A0
Cohort 4A0
Cohort 5A0

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival (OS), defined as the time in weeks from the first dose to death due to any cause or date last known alive at end of follow-up (NCT03684811)
Timeframe: From date of first dose until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 101 weeks

Interventionweeks (Median)
Cohort 1A75.00
Cohort 1BNA
Cohort 2ANA
Cohort 3ANA
Cohort 4A36.43
Cohort 5ANA

[back to top]

Rate of Drug Distribution Within the Blood Stream (Vd/F)

Rate of drug distribution within the blood stream (Vd/F) (NCT03684811)
Timeframe: Cycles 1: Day 1 (0, 1, 2, 4, 8 hours post dose), Days 2, 8, 15, 22 pre dose. Cycles 2 Day 1 (0, 1, 2, 4, 8 hours post dose).

Interventionunits (Number)
Cohort 1ANA
Cohort 1BNA
Cohort 2ANA
Cohort 3ANA
Cohort 4ANA
Cohort 5ANA

[back to top]

Time for Half of the Drug to be Absent in Blood Stream Following Dose (T 1/2)

Time for half of the drug to be absent in blood stream following dose (T 1/2) (NCT03684811)
Timeframe: Cycles 1: Day 1 (0, 1, 2, 4, 8 hours post dose), Days 2, 8, 15, 22 pre dose. Cycles 2 Day 1 (0, 1, 2, 4, 8 hours post dose).

Interventionng / mL (Mean)
Cohort 1ANA
Cohort 1BNA
Cohort 2ANA
Cohort 3ANA
Cohort 4ANA
Cohort 5ANA

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

Time to progression is defined as the time (in weeks) from start of treatment until disease specified progression. (NCT03684811)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug through time of disease progression

Interventionweeks (Median)
Cohort 1A8.21
Cohort 1B8.29
Cohort 2ANA
Cohort 3A15.00
Cohort 4A13.86
Cohort 5A8.14

[back to top]

Time to Response (TTR)

Time to response (TTR) in weeks. TTR is defined as the time from first dose to first response. First response is defined as first observation of overall response of CR+PR+MR (glioma) or CR+PR (Cohort 2-5). (NCT03684811)
Timeframe: Response may be observed from time of first dose through time of treatment discontinuation, up to 2 years.

Interventionweeks (Median)
Cohort 1A38.07
Cohort 2A31.43

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC)

Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) summarized for Cycle 1 and Cycle 2 (NCT03684811)
Timeframe: Cycles 1: Day 1 (0, 1, 2, 4, 8 hours post dose), Days 2, 8, 15, 22 pre dose. Cycles 2 Day 1 (0, 1, 2, 4, 8 hours post dose).

,,,,,
Interventionh*ng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Cohort 1A684020390
Cohort 1B619021210
Cohort 2A1314027580
Cohort 3A1200028170
Cohort 4A1078024400
Cohort 5A1103039540

[back to top]

Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) was summarized for Cycle 1 and Cycle 2. (NCT03684811)
Timeframe: Cycles 1: Day 1 (0, 1, 2, 4, 8 hours post dose), Days 2, 8, 15, 22 pre dose. Cycles 2 Day 1 (0, 1, 2, 4, 8 hours post dose).

,,,,,
Interventionng / mL (Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Cohort 1A388.12965
Cohort 1B369.52870
Cohort 2A879.44045
Cohort 3A863.44104
Cohort 4A744.13650
Cohort 5A815.45663

[back to top]

Time of Peak Plasma Concentration (Tmax)

Time of peak plasma concentration (Tmax) was summarized for Cycle 1 and Cycle 2. (NCT03684811)
Timeframe: Cycles 1: Day 1 (0, 1, 2, 4, 8 hours post dose), Days 2, 8, 15, 22 pre dose. Cycles 2 Day 1 (0, 1, 2, 4, 8 hours post dose).

,,,,,
Interventionhours (Median)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Cohort 1A4.181.97
Cohort 1B3.954.00
Cohort 2A15.271.05
Cohort 3A16.371.98
Cohort 4A7.501.04
Cohort 5A4.171.52

[back to top]

Apparent Clearance (CL/F)

Rate at which drug is removed from the blood stream (CL/F). (NCT03684811)
Timeframe: Cycles 1: Day 1 (0, 1, 2, 4, 8 hours post dose), Days 2, 8, 15, 22 pre dose. Cycles 2 Day 1 (0, 1, 2, 4, 8 hours post dose).

Interventionunits (Geometric Mean)
Cohort 1ANA
Cohort 1BNA
Cohort 2ANA
Cohort 3ANA
Cohort 4ANA
Cohort 5ANA

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate (CR)

To compare the complete response rate, defined as the proportion of patients who achieve complete remission (CR) with APR 246 + azacitidine treatment vs. azacitidine only. (NCT03745716)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Experimental Arm: APR-246 + Azacitidine27
Control Arm: Azacitidine17

[back to top]

Maximum Time to Concentration of MLN4924 (Pevonedistat) Added to the 3-drug Backbone of Azacitidine (Aza), Fludarabine, and Cytarabine Re-induction for Pediatric Patients With Recurrent/Refractory AML and MDS

Median (Range) of the maximum time to concentration of MLN4924 (pevonedistat) added to the 3-drug backbone of azacitidine (aza), fludarabine, and cytarabine re-induction for pediatric patients with recurrent/refractory AML and MDS by dose level measured pre-dose, end of infusion, 4-6 hours, and 24 hours post-dose infusion on Days 1 and 5. (NCT03813147)
Timeframe: Up to 5 days

InterventionHour (Median)
Stratum 1 With 20 mg/m^21.2
PK With 20 mg/m^21.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events Attributable to MLN4924 (Pevonedistat)

Frequency of patients with at least one grade 3 adverse event at least possibly attributable to MLN4924 (pevonedistat) added to the 3-drug backbone of azacitidine (aza), fludarabine, and cytarabine re-induction for pediatric patients with recurrent/refractory AML and MDS by dose level. (NCT03813147)
Timeframe: Up to 70 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Stratum 1 With 20 mg/m^26
PK With 20 mg/m^26

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Antitumor Activity of MLN4924 (Pevonedistat)

Frequency of participants with best overall response by dose level of PR or CR for MLN4924 (pevonedistat) added to the 3-drug backbone of azacitidine (aza), fludarabine, and cytarabine re-induction Per Response Evaluation Criteria for CR (M1 bone marrow (< 5% blasts) with no evidence of circulating blasts or extramedullary disease and with recovery of peripheral blood counts (ANC > 1000/uL and platelet count > 100,000/uL), CRp (M1 bone marrow (< 5% blasts) and no evidence of circulating blasts or extramedullary disease and with recovery of ANC > 1000/uL and platelet transfusion independence), CRi (M1 bone marrow (<5% blasts) and no evidence of circulating blasts or extramedullary disease and with ANC < 1000/uL or platelet count < 100,000/uL without platelet transfusion independence), or PR (M2 marrow status (> 5% or < 25% blasts cells) and at least 50% decrease in bone marrow blast percent from baseline. (NCT03813147)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Stratum 1 With 20 mg/m^21
PK With 20 mg/m^22

[back to top]

Elimination Half-life of MLN4924 (Pevonedistat) Added to the 3-drug Backbone of Azacitidine (Aza), Fludarabine, and Cytarabine Re-induction for Pediatric Patients With Recurrent/Refractory AML and MDS

Median (Range) of the elimination half-life of MLN4924 (pevonedistat) added to the 3-drug backbone of azacitidine (aza), fludarabine, and cytarabine re-induction for pediatric patients with recurrent/refractory AML and MDS by dose level measured pre-dose, end of infusion, 4-6 hours, and 24 hours post-dose infusion on Days 1 and 5. (NCT03813147)
Timeframe: Up to 5 days

InterventionHour (Median)
Stratum 1 With 20 mg/m^24.7
PK With 20 mg/m^25.5

[back to top]

Maximum Concentration of MLN4924 (Pevonedistat) Added to the 3-drug Backbone of Azacitidine (Aza), Fludarabine, and Cytarabine Re-induction for Pediatric Patients With Recurrent/Refractory AML and MDS

Median (Range) of the maximum concentration of MLN4924 (pevonedistat) added to the 3-drug backbone of azacitidine (aza), fludarabine, and cytarabine re-induction for pediatric patients with recurrent/refractory AML and MDS by dose level measured pre-dose, end of infusion, 4-6 hours, and 24 hours post-dose infusion on Days 1 and 5. (NCT03813147)
Timeframe: Up to 5 days

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Stratum 1 With 20 mg/m^2248.5
PK With 20 mg/m^2213

[back to top]

Total Plasma Clearance of MLN4924 (Pevonedistat) Added to the 3-drug Backbone of Azacitidine (Aza), Fludarabine, and Cytarabine Re-induction for Pediatric Patients With Recurrent/Refractory AML and MDS

Median (Range) of the total plasma clearance of MLN4924 (pevonedistat) added to the 3-drug backbone of azacitidine (aza), fludarabine, and cytarabine re-induction for pediatric patients with recurrent/refractory AML and MDS by dose level measured pre-dose, end of infusion, 4-6 hours, and 24 hours post-dose infusion on Days 1 and 5. (NCT03813147)
Timeframe: Up to 5 days

InterventionL/h/m^2 (Median)
Stratum 1 With 20 mg/m^220.1
PK With 20 mg/m^219.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities of MLN4924 (Pevonedistat)

Frequency of patients with dose limiting toxicity in the first cycle of MLN4924 (pevonedistat) added to the 3-drug backbone of azacitidine (aza), fludarabine, and cytarabine re-induction for pediatric patients with recurrent/refractory AML and MDS by dose level among patients in the dose escalation cohort. (NCT03813147)
Timeframe: Up to 35 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Stratum 1 With 20 mg/m^21
PK With 20 mg/m^22

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve of MLN4924 (Pevonedistat) Added to the 3-drug Backbone of Azacitidine (Aza), Fludarabine, and Cytarabine Re-induction for Pediatric Patients With Recurrent/Refractory AML and MDS

Median (Range) of the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve of MLN4924 (pevonedistat) added to the 3-drug backbone of azacitidine (aza), fludarabine, and cytarabine re-induction for pediatric patients with recurrent/refractory AML and MDS by dose level measured pre-dose, end of infusion, 4-6 hours, and 24 hours post-dose infusion on Days 1 and 5. (NCT03813147)
Timeframe: Up to 5 days

Interventionhr*ng/mL (Median)
Stratum 1 With 20 mg/m^21004.9
PK With 20 mg/m^21047.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission or Complete Remission With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CR + CRi)

"The composite complete remission rate is defined as the percentage of participants with complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) at any time during the study as assessed by the investigator. Response was based on bone marrow results and hematology values according to the modified International Working Group (IWG) criteria for AML:~CR: Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 10^3/μL (1,000/μL), platelets > 10^5/μL (100,000/μL), red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence, and bone marrow with < 5% blasts~CRi: Bone marrow with < 5% blasts, and absolute neutrophils of ≤ 10^3/μL or platelets ≤ 10^5/μL" (NCT03941964)
Timeframe: Assessed at Cycle 1 end, at Cycle 2 end if CR/CRi wasn't achieved at Cycle 1 end, or Cycle 4 end if CR/CRi wasn't achieved at Cycle 2 end. Median treatment duration of venetoclax was 16.1 wks (range 3.9-38.1) and 21.1 wks (range 2.7-40.4), respectively.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Venetoclax 400 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg70.0
Venetoclax 400 mg + Decitabine 20 mg63.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi)

"The complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery rate is defined as the percentage of participants with complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) at any time during the study as assessed by the investigator. Response was based on bone marrow results and hematology values according to the modified International Working Group (IWG) criteria for AML:~CRi: Bone marrow with < 5% blasts, and absolute neutrophils of ≤ 10^3/μL or platelets ≤ 10^5/μL." (NCT03941964)
Timeframe: Assessed at Cycle 1 end, at Cycle 2 end if CR/CRi wasn't achieved at Cycle 1 end, or Cycle 4 end if CR/CRi wasn't achieved at Cycle 2 end. Median treatment duration of venetoclax was 16.1 wks (range 3.9-38.1) and 21.1 wks (range 2.7-40.4), respectively.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Venetoclax 400 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg56.7
Venetoclax 400 mg + Decitabine 20 mg36.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Post-baseline Transfusion Independence

The transfusion independence rate is defined as the percentage of participants with post-baseline transfusion independence, which is defined as a period of at least 56 days with no transfusion after the first dose of study drug and within 30 days of the last dose of study drug, death, or initiation of post-treatment therapy, whichever is earliest. (NCT03941964)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study drug to the last dose of study drug +30 days, or death, or initiation of post-treatment therapy, whichever occurred earliest. Median time on follow-up was 183.5 days and 195.0 days, respectively.

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Red blood cells (RBC)PlateletsRBC and platelets
Venetoclax 400 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg50.073.350.0
Venetoclax 400 mg + Decitabine 20 mg60.073.360.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR)

"The complete remission rate is defined as the percentage of participants with complete remission (CR) at any time during the study as assessed by the investigator. Response was based on bone marrow results and hematology values according to the modified International Working Group (IWG) criteria for AML:~CR: Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 10^3/μL (1,000/μL), platelets > 10^5/μL (100,000/μL), red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence, and bone marrow with < 5% blasts" (NCT03941964)
Timeframe: Assessed at Cycle 1 end, at Cycle 2 end if CR/CRi wasn't achieved at Cycle 1 end, or Cycle 4 end if CR/CRi wasn't achieved at Cycle 2 end. Median treatment duration of venetoclax was 16.1 wks (range 3.9-38.1) and 21.1 wks (range 2.7-40.4), respectively.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Venetoclax 400 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg13.3
Venetoclax 400 mg + Decitabine 20 mg26.7

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events Incidence With of Salicylate + Venetoclax + Decitabine

Study drug associated adverse events during therapy (NCT04146038)
Timeframe: During the first 2 cycles, 56 days total

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Salsalate, Decitabine, Azacitidine, Venetoclax)1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Complete or Partial Response

Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR (NCT04146038)
Timeframe: During the first 2 cycles 56 days total

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Salsalate, Decitabine, Azacitidine, Venetoclax)1

[back to top]

Event-Free Survival (EFS)

EFS was defined as time from study randomization to date of failure to achieve complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi), relapse from CR/CRi, or death. Assessments of disease response based on criteria: European Leukemia Net (ELN) 2017 guidelines. CR was defined as bone marrow blasts <5%; absence of circulating blasts and blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; absolute neutrophil count (ANC)≥1.0×10^9/L (1000/µL); platelet count≥100×10^9/L (100,000/µL). CRi was defined as all CR criteria except for residual neutropenia (<1.0×10^9/L [1000/µL]) or thrombocytopenia (<100×10^9/L [100,000/µL]). For participants who achieved CR/CRi, if relapse is not observed by time of analysis, was censored at the date of last disease assessment. If failed to achieve CR/CRi, date of treatment failure was set on day of randomization. (NCT04266795)
Timeframe: Up to 22 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Venetoclax 100/200/400 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^211.24
Pevonedistat 20 mg/m^2 + Venetoclax 100/200/400 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^27.72

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]