Page last updated: 2024-11-12

teriparatide

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID16132393
MeSH IDM0028836

Synonyms (5)

Synonym
teriparatide rdna
ly-333334
ly333334
pth (1-34)
OGBMKVWORPGQRR-UMXFMPSGSA-N
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Drug Classes (1)

ClassDescription
polypeptideA peptide containing ten or more amino acid residues.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Protein Targets (1)

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Parathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.00010.00010.00010.0001AID1381232
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Activation Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Parathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)0.00130.00030.00130.0025AID1381233; AID482428; AID482479
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Other Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Parathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)EC20 (µMol)0.00020.00020.00020.0002AID1381233
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (18)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
skeletal system developmentParathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)
in utero embryonic developmentParathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chondrocyte differentiationParathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)
osteoblast developmentParathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathwayParathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayParathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerParathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-modulating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayParathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayParathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayParathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cell population proliferationParathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell population proliferationParathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationParathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)
bone mineralizationParathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)
bone resorptionParathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cell maturationParathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of inositol phosphate biosynthetic processParathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular calcium ion homeostasisParathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (5)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
parathyroid hormone receptor activityParathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingParathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)
peptide hormone bindingParathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein homodimerization activityParathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled peptide receptor activityParathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (6)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
nucleusParathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmParathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneParathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneParathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneParathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)
receptor complexParathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneParathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptorHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (17)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID372215Volume of distribution in human2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-09, Volume: 52, Issue:13
Antagonists of the calcium receptor I. Amino alcohol-based parathyroid hormone secretagogues.
AID1381258Half life in Sprague-Dawley rat at 5 ug/kg, sc2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-26, Volume: 61, Issue:14
Development of a Novel Human Parathyroid Hormone Receptor 1 (hPTHR1) Agonist (CH5447240), a Potent and Orally Available Small Molecule for Treatment of Hypoparathyroidism.
AID456241Ex vivo calvaria formation in neonatal mouse assessed as increase in total bone area at 0.001 uM after 7 days relative to control2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 18, Issue:1
Modulation of Wnt signaling through inhibition of secreted frizzled-related protein I (sFRP-1) with N-substituted piperidinyl diphenylsulfonyl sulfonamides: part II.
AID1569249Osteo-blastogenic activity in mouse MC3T3-E1 cells assessed as stimulation of ALP activity at 1 uM supplemented with fresh medium every 3 to 4 days and measured after 14 days relative to control
AID482428Agonist activity at PTH1R overexpressed in HEK293 cells assessed as intracellular cAMP production2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-10, Volume: 53, Issue:11
Emerging targets in osteoporosis disease modification.
AID1381255In vivo agonist activity at PTHR1 in Crl:CD(SD) rat TPTX model assessed as increase in serum calcium levels at 9 nmol/kg, sc administered as single dose measured after 24 hrs by o-cresolphthalein complexone method2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-26, Volume: 61, Issue:14
Development of a Novel Human Parathyroid Hormone Receptor 1 (hPTHR1) Agonist (CH5447240), a Potent and Orally Available Small Molecule for Treatment of Hypoparathyroidism.
AID371999Tmax in human2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-09, Volume: 52, Issue:13
Antagonists of the calcium receptor I. Amino alcohol-based parathyroid hormone secretagogues.
AID1381232Displacement of 125I-PTH (1 to 15 residues) from human PTHR1 expressed in African green monkey COS7 cell membranes at 300 uM after 90 mins by gamma counting analysis2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-26, Volume: 61, Issue:14
Development of a Novel Human Parathyroid Hormone Receptor 1 (hPTHR1) Agonist (CH5447240), a Potent and Orally Available Small Molecule for Treatment of Hypoparathyroidism.
AID456243Ex vivo calvaria formation in neonatal mouse assessed as increase in osteoblast formation at 0.001 uM after 7 days relative to control2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 18, Issue:1
Modulation of Wnt signaling through inhibition of secreted frizzled-related protein I (sFRP-1) with N-substituted piperidinyl diphenylsulfonyl sulfonamides: part II.
AID1474166Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring severity class index2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID1381257Tmax in Sprague-Dawley rat at 5 ug/kg, sc2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-26, Volume: 61, Issue:14
Development of a Novel Human Parathyroid Hormone Receptor 1 (hPTHR1) Agonist (CH5447240), a Potent and Orally Available Small Molecule for Treatment of Hypoparathyroidism.
AID1381256In vivo agonist activity at PTHR1 in Crl:CD(SD) rat TPTX model assessed as decrease in serum phosphorus levels 9 nmol/kg, sc administered as single dose measured after 24 hrs by xanthine oxidase method2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-26, Volume: 61, Issue:14
Development of a Novel Human Parathyroid Hormone Receptor 1 (hPTHR1) Agonist (CH5447240), a Potent and Orally Available Small Molecule for Treatment of Hypoparathyroidism.
AID1381233Agonist activity at human PTHR1 expressed in HKRKB7 cells assessed as accumulation of intracellular cAMP after 20 mins by enzyme immunoassay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-26, Volume: 61, Issue:14
Development of a Novel Human Parathyroid Hormone Receptor 1 (hPTHR1) Agonist (CH5447240), a Potent and Orally Available Small Molecule for Treatment of Hypoparathyroidism.
AID482479Agonist activity at PTH1R overexpressed in HEK293 cells assessed as intracellular cAMP mobilization2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-10, Volume: 53, Issue:11
Emerging targets in osteoporosis disease modification.
AID372001Clearance in men2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-09, Volume: 52, Issue:13
Antagonists of the calcium receptor I. Amino alcohol-based parathyroid hormone secretagogues.
AID1474167Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring verified drug-induced liver injury concern status2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID372000Clearance in women2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-09, Volume: 52, Issue:13
Antagonists of the calcium receptor I. Amino alcohol-based parathyroid hormone secretagogues.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (6)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's1 (16.67)29.6817
2010's5 (83.33)24.3611
2020's0 (0.00)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials0 (0.00%)5.53%
Reviews2 (33.33%)6.00%
Case Studies0 (0.00%)4.05%
Observational0 (0.00%)0.25%
Other4 (66.67%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (146)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Påskyndar PTH läkningen av Konservativt Behandlade Humerusfrakturer? [NCT01105832]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
Comparison of the Effects of Teriparatide With Those of Alendronate Sodium on Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density in Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis [NCT00051558]Phase 3428 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-11-30Completed
Evaluating Teriparatide as a Chondroregenerative Therapy in Human Osteoarthritis [NCT03072147]Phase 276 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-01Completed
A Phase I, Partially Blinded, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Active Comparator Study to Explore the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Post-menopausal Women After Daily Oral Doses of PTH134 [NCT01224717]Phase 1104 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
The Use of Teriparatide as an Adjunctive Therapy for the Treatment of Jones Fractures [NCT01173081]Phase 438 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-07-31Recruiting
Examination How the Administration Period of Teriparatide Affects Bone Metabolism and Bone Mineral Density Prior to Denosumab Therapy [NCT03702140]Phase 290 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-10-09Recruiting
Treatment of Osteogenesis Imperfecta With Parathyroid Hormone and Zoledronic Acid [NCT03735537]Phase 4380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-11-01Recruiting
[NCT02156960]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-05-31Recruiting
Teriparatide (Forsteo) Treatment in Postmenopausal Women: Mechanism of Action. A Two-year Open-label Single-arm Study of Teriparatide in Secondary Care [NCT01293292]Phase 419 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
A Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Teriparatide (FORTEO) for Increasing Bone Mass and Improving Bone Strength in Adults Affected With Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI) [NCT00131469]Phase 479 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
Two-dose, Positive Drug Control, Multicentre, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Recombinant Human Parathyroid Hormone for Injection(rhPTH)(1-34) Once a Week to Treat Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Women for the Evaluation the Pharmacokinetics and Safety and [NCT03720886]Phase 1/Phase 2148 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-10-01Active, not recruiting
A Three Stage, Study to Assess the Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Oral PTH (1-34) in Healthy Subjects [NCT02202603]Phase 142 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-31Completed
Prospective,Non-interventional Study Investigating Possible Correlation Between Adherence to Postmenopausal and Steroid Induced Osteoporosis Treatment and Physicians' Perception Regarding Osteoporosis Medication [NCT02472782]851 participants (Actual)Observational [Patient Registry]2015-05-31Completed
[NCT02223416]Phase 10 participants InterventionalCompleted
Teriparatide for Fracture Repair in Humans: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Placebo-controlled Pilot Study in Female and Male Patients With Proximal Humerus Fracture: The TERAFRAP Study [NCT02091492]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to no participants)
Förbättrar PTH Postero-lateral fusionsläkning Vid Ryggkirurgi? [NCT02090244]Phase 434 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Completed
Effect of Teriparatide on Fracture Healing in Patients With Incomplete Atypical Femur Fractures: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01896011]Phase 334 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Completed
Effect of 24 Months of Teriparatide Therapy on Bone Microarchitecture and Bone Volume in Men and Women With Osteoporosis [NCT01155232]100 participants (Anticipated)Observational2004-11-30Recruiting
A One-year Partial Double-blinded, Randomized, Multi-center, Multi-national Study to Assess the Effects of Combination Therapy of Annual Zoledronic Acid (5 mg) and Daily Subcutaneous Teriparatide (2mcrg) on Postmenopausal Women With Severe Osteoporosis [NCT00439244]Phase 3412 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
Effect and Cost Comparation of Different Treatment Strategies for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures (OVF): Teriparatide Injection and Percutaneous Vertebroplasty (PVP) [NCT03692143]90 participants (Anticipated)Observational2017-01-01Active, not recruiting
The Use of Nuclear Scintigraphy to Evaluate the Anabolic Effects of Teriparatide on the Skeleton in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis [NCT00259298]Phase 412 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
Efficacy of Teriparatide Treatment in Patients With New Forms of Inherited Low-Turnover Osteoporosis [NCT01360424]Phase 46 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
MicroRNAs Levels in Women With Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Under Antiresorptive or Osteoanabolic Treatment [NCT03472846]Phase 426 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-01Completed
Early Effects of PTH on the Proximal Femur [NCT01309399]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
Study on the Effect of 24 Months of Teriparatide Therapy on Bone Microarchitecture and Bone Volume in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis [NCT01155245]60 participants (Anticipated)Observational2008-06-30Active, not recruiting
A Six-month Phase 2 Study of Oral hPTH(1-34) (EBP05) in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mass [NCT04003467]Phase 2161 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-06-30Completed
A Multiple-Dose Study to Evaluate Skin Irritation and Sensitization of Teriparatide Administered Transdermally in Healthy Postmenopausal Women [NCT01250145]Phase 1251 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
A Phase 2 Study for Transdermal Application of Teriparatide [NCT01011556]Phase 2233 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Completed
Mechanisms Underlying the Bone Modeling Effects of Combined Anabolic/Antiresorptive Administration [NCT04026256]Phase 437 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-02Completed
A Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Multi-dose Phase 2 Study to Determine the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of AMG 785 in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Density [NCT00896532]Phase 2419 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-03Completed
An Open-label Crossover Study to Determine the Patient Preference Between ZP-PTH Patches and Forteo Pens After Daily Treatment for 14 Days in Women 55-85 Years of Age [NCT02478879]Phase 124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-06-30Completed
Management Strategies by an Orthopedic Department to Improve the Evaluation and Treatment of Osteoporosis. [NCT02239523]200 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-21Completed
The Treatment of Osteoporosis Using a Combination of Teriparatide (Forteo) and Denosumab [NCT02130973]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-08-31Active, not recruiting
Pharmacokinetic and PHarmacodynamic Analysis and Evaluation of Teriparatide (PTH 1-34) Between Sexes [NCT04921124]Phase 330 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-05-24Completed
Efficacy of Sequential Therapies After Osteoanabolic Treatment in Postmenopausal Women With Severe Osteoporosis: the Sequential Treatment After Romosozumab and Teriparatide (START) Study [NCT06164795]150 participants (Anticipated)Observational2023-11-25Recruiting
The Effect of Teriparatide on the Early Postoperative Hypocalcemia After Parathyroidectomy in Dialysis Patients: a Pilot, Randomized Trial [NCT04750460]Phase 320 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-01Completed
Teriparatide for the Treatment of Idiopathic Osteoporosis in Premenopausal Women [NCT00697463]Phase 2/Phase 322 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-20Completed
Comparison of the Effects of Teriparatide With Those of Risedronate on Lumbar Spine BMD (Bone Mineral Density) in Men and Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mass and a Recent Pertrochanteric Hip Fracture [NCT00887354]Phase 4224 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
A Randomized Crossover TrIal to Compare Recombinant Human rhPTH(1-34) to the ASsociation Alfacalcidol/Hydrochlorothiazide in the Treatment of Severe Primary Hypoparathyroidism [NCT02824718]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-06Completed
A Randomized, Parallel-Group, Phase 2 Dose-finding Study to Evaluate the Effects of BA058 in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis [NCT00542425]Phase 2222 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
A Phase 2, 24-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Dose-Ranging Study To Evaluate The Effect Of Teriparatide Nasal Spray On Bone Mineral Density In Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Density [NCT00624481]Phase 2350 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-03-31Withdrawn
Use of Teriparatide to Accelerate Fracture Healing [NCT00594906]10 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Terminated(stopped due to The study was terminated due to poor enrollment.)
The Effect of Teriparatide Compared With Risedronate on Back Pain in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures [NCT00343252]Phase 3712 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
A Dose Ranging Study of the Effects of Macroflux® PTH Compared With Macroflux® Placebo and FORTEO® in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis [NCT00489918]Phase 2165 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
[NCT01063504]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
A Pilot Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Oral PTH (1-34) in the Treatment of Hypoparathyroidism [NCT02152228]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Completed
An Italian Observational Study to Evaluate Fracture Outcomes, Compliance to Treatment, Back Pain, Health-related Quality of Life in Patients With Severe Osteoporosis Treated According to Common Clinical Practice [NCT00696644]794 participants (Actual)Observational2008-06-30Completed
An Observational Study to Assess Back Pain in Patients With Severe Osteoporosis Treated With Teriparatide Versus Antiresorptives [NCT00761332]650 participants (Actual)Observational2008-02-29Completed
Clinical and Molecular Characterization of Suspected Partial 25-hydroxyvitamin D-1-alpha-hydroxylase Deficiency [NCT00754442]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
A Phase 1b, Open-label, Partially Randomised Study to Assess Safety and Compare Pharmacokinetics of New Oral hPTH(1-34) Tablet Formulations vs. Oral EBP05 Tablets and Subcutaneous Forteo® Injection in Healthy Male Subjects [NCT05965167]Phase 1/Phase 245 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-11Active, not recruiting
Effect of PTH(1-34) Treatment on Fracture Healing in Vivo [NCT00741182]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Withdrawn
Comparison of Teriparatide and Calcitonin in the Treatment of Men and Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis [NCT00414973]Phase 3364 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
Cyclic Versus Daily Teriparatide on Bone Mass [NCT00668941]Phase 2140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-09-30Active, not recruiting
Effects of LY333334 in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis [NCT00670501]Phase 31,637 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-08-31Completed
Comparison of 3 Month PTHrP(1-36) and PTH(1-34) on Post-Menopausal Osteoporosis [NCT00853723]Phase 2105 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
A Double-Masked, Randomized, Two-Treatment Cross-over Study Comparing the Pharmacokinetics of PF708 and Forteo Administered by Subcutaneous Injection in Healthy Adult Subjects [NCT02656810]Phase 170 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
Bone Microarchitecture and Implant Stabilization in Atrophic Jaws Reconstructed With Bone Grafts Treated With Teriparatide [NCT06061354]Phase 442 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-23Recruiting
Skeletal Histomorphometry in Patients on Teriparatide or Zoledronic Acid Therapy [NCT00927186]Phase 469 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
Osteocalcin in Bone Metabolism and Aging: Effect of Vitamin K Supplementation on Circulating Levels of Osteocalcin, on Glucose and Energy Metabolism and on Muscle Mass and Function [NCT04669782]123 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-24Recruiting
Effect of PTH Combined With Weight-Bearing on Bone Density and Bone Architecture in People With Spinal Cord Injury [NCT00826228]Phase 412 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Teriparatide 20 Micrograms in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis [NCT00532207]Phase 350 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-11-30Completed
Treatment of Adynamic Bone Disorder With Parathyroid Hormone in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease [NCT04522622]Phase 466 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-15Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of LY333334 in Japanese Patients With Osteoporosis [NCT00433160]Phase 3207 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Comparison of the Effects of Teriparatide With Those of Risedronate on Lumbar Spine vBMD in Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis in Men [NCT00503399]Phase 392 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
A Single-centre, Open-label, Five-way Crossover Study in Healthy Female Participants to Assess the Pharmacokinetics of Nasally Administered Formulations of Teriparatide Compared to a Subcutaneous Injection. [NCT01913834]Phase 17 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-09-30Not yet recruiting
Comparación de la Eficacia y Seguridad clínicas de Osteofortil Respecto de Forteo [NCT01945788]Phase 4110 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-06-30Active, not recruiting
Novel Combination Therapy for Osteoporosis in Men [NCT03994172]Phase 448 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-01Recruiting
The Role of Myokines in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis [NCT04206618]220 participants (Actual)Observational2019-06-01Completed
NMR Imaging and Stereological Analysis of Trabecular Bone in Female Subjects 60 and Older at Risk of Fracture Receiving Either Zoledronic Acid or Teriparatide [NCT01153425]Phase 433 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
Bone Properties in Hypoparathyroidism: Effects of PTH [NCT00473265]Phase 2/Phase 368 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-05-31Completed
Study CR9108963: A 12-month, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo and Active-controlled Dose-range Finding Study of the Efficacy and Safety of SB-751689 in Post-menopausal Women With Osteoporosis [NCT00471237]Phase 2564 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-14Terminated(stopped due to Terminated for futility by sponsor after a pre-planned interim review of data)
A Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Effect of Six Weeks of Treatment With Nasal Spray (NS) ZT-034, Compared to Subcutaneous (SC) Forteo and Placebo, on Bone Formation, as Assessed by Stimulation of Serum P1NP Levels in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bon [NCT01604057]Phase 2130 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Active, not recruiting
B3D-MC-GHDF: Community Experience of Subjects With Osteoporosis Using the Forteo B Pen to Self Administer Once Daily Teriparatide Therapy [NCT00577863]Phase 3200 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
PTH and Vibration in OSteoporosis (PaVOS) Study [NCT02563353]35 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-30Completed
A Phase Ib Study to Assess the Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Oral PTH (1-34) Formulations in Healthy Subjects [NCT02571140]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
Enhancing Osteoporosis Therapy: Can We Open the Anabolic Window? [NCT01166958]Phase 426 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
Direct Assessment of Non-Vertebral Fractures in Community Experience (DANCE) [NCT01078805]4,167 participants (Actual)Observational2003-08-31Completed
Comparison of Teriparatide and Calcitonin in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis [NCT00542984]Phase 370 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-08-31Completed
Comparison of Teriparatide and Calcitonin in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis [NCT00543023]Phase 3104 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
Comparison of Teriparatide and Calcitonin in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis [NCT00543218]Phase 363 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-12-31Completed
Compliance With and Acceptance of Teriparatide Pen Injection in Severely Osteoporotic Patients [CATS] [NCT00191802]Phase 3120 participants Interventional2003-09-30Completed
TUHRS Study - Teriparatide Use in Hip Replaced Subjects A Pilot Study on the Use of Teriparatide in Severe Osteoporotic Women With Hip Fracture and Submitted to Hip Replacement [NCT00191321]Phase 360 participants Interventional2004-07-31Completed
Assessment of Dose Response of LY333334 in Japanese Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis [NCT00191867]Phase 2160 participants Interventional2005-02-28Completed
Second Study of the Effect of Teriparatide on Femoral Neck Fracture Healing [NCT01473602]Phase 339 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
Study of Teriparatide in Stress Fracture Healing [NCT04196855]Phase 3136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-12-23Recruiting
A Phase I Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of Parathyroid Hormone (1-34) Administered Orally Via RaniPill™ Capsule [NCT05164614]Phase 150 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-02-21Completed
The Effects of Teriparatide on Bone Microarchitecture as Determined by High Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Digital Topological Analysis [NCT00557310]Phase 435 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
[NCT00446589]Phase 419 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Terminated(stopped due to due to financial problems)
A Double Blind, Randomized, Repeat Dose Parallel Group Study of Recombinant Human Parathyroid Hormone Analog Tablets, or Placebo Tablets, Compared to Open Label Forsteo® in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis [NCT01321723]Phase 297 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
Bone Marker Changes In One Month Treatment With TERIPARATIDE (LY333334) Injections (rDNA Origin) in Men and Postmenopausal Women With Severe Osteoporosis [NCT00532545]Phase 445 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-30Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel Study to Assess the Clinical Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of ViaDerm-hPTH (1-34) in Comparison to Subcutaneous Injection of Forteo in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis [NCT00535860]Phase 2104 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
Fracture Recovery for Returning to Duty (Teriparatide STRONG) [NCT04589819]Phase 4183 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-08Enrolling by invitation
Differential Effects of Teriparatide and Strontium Ranelate on Bone Remodeling and Formation in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis [NCT00239629]Phase 473 participants Interventional2005-09-30Completed
The Effects of Therapy With Teriparatide (Recombinant Parathyroid Hormone (1-34) on Vascular Compliance and Osteoprotegerin/RANKL [NCT00347737]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Withdrawn
To Study the Efficacy of Teriparatide in Improving Remodeling of Foot Bones in Chronic Charcot Neuroarthropathy in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus. [NCT02023411]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Comparative Multicenter Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of BA058 (Abaloparatide) for Injection for Prevention of Fracture in Ambulatory Postmenopausal Women With Severe Osteoporosis and at [NCT01343004]Phase 32,463 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
Effects of Teriparatide on Distal Radius Fracture Healing [NCT00190944]Phase 2105 participants Interventional2004-12-31Completed
A Feasibility Study to Explore the Difference in Healing Time Between Teriparatide Treatment and Standard Care on Weber B Ankle Fractures in Older People [NCT02955056]Phase 410 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-10-31Recruiting
Phase IV Study Teriparatide and Antiresorptive Combination Treatment Subsequent to 9 Months of Teriparatide Monotherapy [NCT01535027]Phase 4125 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
Effects of Teriparatide in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis Previously Treated With Alendronate or Raloxifene [NCT00079924]Phase 4200 participants Interventional2004-11-30Completed
Sequential Use of Teriparatide and Raloxifene HCl in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis [NCT00035256]Phase 4330 participants Interventional2001-10-31Completed
PTH Once Weekly Research (POWR) [NCT00065637]Phase 350 participants Interventional2003-12-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Parathyroid Hormone Following Myeloablative Sequential Unrelated Cord Blood Transplantation [NCT00393380]Phase 213 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Study stopped because of toxicity concerns.)
[NCT00046137]Phase 30 participants InterventionalCompleted
Comparison of a 2-Year Therapy of Teriparatide Alone and Its Sequential Use for 1 Year, With or Without Raloxifene HCl, in the Treatment of Severe Postmenopausal Osteoporosis [NCT00191425]Phase 4810 participants Interventional2002-08-31Completed
Bone Effects of Subcutaneous Teriparatide Following Discontinuation of Alendronate Treatment in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis [NCT00191893]Phase 366 participants Interventional2003-09-30Completed
Teriparatide for Joint Erosions in Rheumatoid Arthritis: The TERA Trial [NCT01400516]Phase 426 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
Effect of Teriparatide, Vibration and the Combination on Bone Mass and Bone Architecture in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury [NCT01225055]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Completed
Acute Effect of Teriparatide With Bisphosphonate or Denosumab on Bone Resorption [NCT01750086]Phase 427 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
Treatment of Atraumatic Bone Marrow Edema With Denosumab and Teriparatide vs Placebo [NCT01734824]Phase 490 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-05-31Suspended(stopped due to no patients randomized)
To Compare Efficacy of Weekly Versus Daily Teriparatide in the Management of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis [NCT01760798]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-01-31Recruiting
A Study to Assess the Effects on Serum Calcium When Teriparatide is Used With Active Vitamin D in Osteoporosis Patients [NCT01430104]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
Assessment of the Efficacy of Forteo (Teriparatide) in Patients Undergoing Posterolateral Lumbar Spinal Fusion [NCT01292252]Phase 436 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
Combination Risedronate - Parathyroid Hormone Trial in Male Osteoporosis [NCT01611571]Phase 331 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-31Completed
Replication of the VERO Osteoporosis Trial in Healthcare Claims Data [NCT04879420]12,757 participants (Actual)Observational2020-10-29Completed
A Retrospective, Observational Cohort Study Evaluating the Effectiveness and Cardiovascular Safety of Abaloparatide in Postmenopausal Women New to Anabolic Therapies [NCT04974723]16,000 participants (Anticipated)Observational2021-07-01Active, not recruiting
The Effect of Weekly Injection of Teriparatide on the Healing of Distal Radius Fracture in a Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT04473989]Phase 280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-01Not yet recruiting
A Phase II Study of Short-Term Use of Teriparatide (Forteo) in the Treatment of Patients With Postoperative Hypocalcemia [NCT00623974]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Terminated due to slow accrual.)
Bone Formation-Resorption Coupling and Osteoporosis [NCT00000400]Phase 2176 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-08-31Completed
Efficacy of Wharton's Jelly-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Combination With Parathyroid Hormone for Vertebral Compression Fracture [NCT05018637]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-01Enrolling by invitation
Renal Osteodystrophy: A Fresh Approach [NCT02440581]141 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-01Completed
Study of the Key Techniques of Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporotic Refracture [NCT05866029]2,310 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-02Not yet recruiting
PTH(1-34) and Pelvic Fracture Healing - a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02972424]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-01Completed
Pilot Study of Teriparatide for Postsurgical Hypoparathyroidism [NCT01171690]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Funding problems)
Effect of 1 Month Preoperative Teriparatide Use on the Insertional Torque of Pedicle Screws for Lumbar Fusion Surgery [NCT03770338]192 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-03-01Recruiting
Cyclical vs Daily Continuous PTH in Combination With Alendronate vs Alendronate Alone [NCT00005006]Phase 2140 participants (Actual)Interventional1987-09-30Completed
A Pilot Methodology Study To Evaluate Changes In Bone Quality Parameters Following Therapy With Recombinant Human Parathyroid Hormone, PTH (Forteo) [NCT00365924]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
Effect of Teriparatide on Femoral Neck Fracture Healing [NCT01473589]Phase 3122 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
Teriparatide Compared With Alendronate on Spine Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis [NCT02416271]Phase 4203 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-04-30Completed
Novel Precision Medicine Approach to Treatment of Osteoporosis Based on Bone Turnover [NCT05151484]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-21Recruiting
Randomized Controlled Trial of Teriparatide for the Treatment of Idiopathic Osteoporosis in Premenopausal Women [NCT01440803]Phase 241 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-02Completed
An Open-label, Randomized, Teriparatide-controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of Treatment With Romosozumab in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis Previously Treated With Bisphosphonate Therapy [NCT01796301]Phase 3436 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
Stem Cell Recruitment in Osteoporosis Therapy [NCT01656629]55 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Inability to analyze collected samples due to no funds.)
Denosumab and Teriparatide Study (DATA-HD and DATA-EX) [NCT02176382]Phase 476 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Completed
Fracture (FX) Improvement With Teriparatide: FiX-IT Study [NCT01705587]Phase 413 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Completed
The Effect of Treatment With Teriparatide and Zoledronic Acid in Patients With Osteogenesis Imperfecta [NCT01679080]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Eli Lilly has withdrawn support to the study of teriparatide and placebo pens. The study was not able to continue as a randomized study without the supply of placebo pens.)
Anabolism Versus Antiresorption: A Quadruple Labeling Histomorphometry Study to Compare the Mechanism of Action of Teriparatide and Denosumab in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis [NCT01753856]Phase 469 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
The Role of PTH in Low Bone Mass in Anorexia Nervosa [NCT00759772]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
The Denosumab And Teriparatide Administration Study (DATA) [NCT00926380]Phase 294 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
The Impact of Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) on Craniofacial Osseous Regeneration in Bone [NCT01279187]Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Study was terminated due to patient complications unrelated to study drugs)
12 Month Open-Label Extension Study of the Effect of Teriparatide on Bone in People With Chronic SCI [NCT02025179]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
A Randomized Study Comparing the Effects of PF708 and Forteo in Patients With Osteoporosis [NCT03002428]Phase 3181 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-31Completed
A Randomized, Open, Self-crossover, Single-dose Clinical Study to Compare Pharmacokinetic of Teriparatide Injection (SAL001) and the Original Drug FORSTEO in Healthy Chinese Adult Volunteers [NCT04747392]Phase 164 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-08-19Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of Teriparatide on Bone Union in Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture Patients Treated With Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) [NCT03133195]Phase 360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-05-17Recruiting
The Relationship Between the Residual Renal Function and Osteoporosis Treatment [NCT02304887]1,000 participants (Anticipated)Observational2006-01-31Recruiting
Teriparatide and Risedronate in the Treatment of Patients With Severe Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: Comparative Effects on Vertebral Fractures [NCT01709110]Phase 41,366 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00051558 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at 18 Month Endpoint in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD)
NCT00051558 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at 18 Month Endpoint in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Female Subset
NCT00051558 (15) [back to overview]Any Fracture, Nonvertebral Fractures, Vertebral Fractures, Clinical Vertebral Fractures, and Severity Fractures
NCT00051558 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined
NCT00051558 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined
NCT00051558 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined
NCT00051558 (15) [back to overview]Time Course of Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers in Subset of Patients - Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase
NCT00051558 (15) [back to overview]Time Course of Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers in Subset of Patients - Osteocalcin
NCT00051558 (15) [back to overview]Time Course of Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers in Subset of Patients - Serum C-terminal Propeptide of Type 1 Procollagen
NCT00051558 (15) [back to overview]Time Course of Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers in Subset of Patients - Serum N-terminal Propeptide of Type 1 Procollagen
NCT00051558 (15) [back to overview]Time Course of Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers in Subset of Patients - Serum Type 1 Collagen Degradation Fragments
NCT00051558 (15) [back to overview]Time Course of Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined
NCT00051558 (15) [back to overview]Time Course of Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Female Subset
NCT00051558 (15) [back to overview]Time Course of Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined
NCT00051558 (15) [back to overview]Time Course of Change From Baseline in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined
NCT00131469 (2) [back to overview]Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD)
NCT00131469 (2) [back to overview]Total Hip BMD
NCT00259298 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Whole Skeleton Skeletal Plasma Clearance of 99m Technetium Methylene Diphosphonate (99m Tc-MDP) to 18 Months
NCT00259298 (5) [back to overview]Change in Qualitative Visual Scores of Focal Uptake of 99m Technetium Methylene Diphosphonate (99m Tc-MDP) in the Whole Skeleton
NCT00259298 (5) [back to overview]Change in Skeletal Plasma Clearance of 99m Technetium Methylene Diphosphonate (99m Tc-MDP) in the Whole Skeleton, Skull, Mandible, Spine, Pelvis, Upper Extremities, and Lower Extremities
NCT00259298 (5) [back to overview]Change in Skeletal Uptake of 99m Technetium Methylene Diphosphonate (99m Tc-MDP) in the Whole Skeleton, Skull, Mandible, Spine, Pelvis, Upper Extremities, and Lower Extremities
NCT00259298 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Changes in Diffuse Uptake of 99m Tc-MDP - Qualitative Visual Assessment in the Whole Skeleton
NCT00343252 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Time to First Occurrence of at Least a 30% Reduction in 24-Hour Average Back Pain up to 18 Months
NCT00343252 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Time to First Occurrence of at Least 30% Reduction in 24-Hour Worst Back Pain up to 12 Months
NCT00343252 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Time to First Occurrence of at Least 30% Reduction in 24-Hour Worst Back Pain up to 18 Months
NCT00343252 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 6-Month Endpoint, European Foundation for Osteoporosis Quality of Life Instrument (QUALEFFO)
NCT00343252 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12-Month Endpoint in the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.
NCT00343252 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 6-Month Endpoint in the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.
NCT00343252 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 3-Month Endpoint in the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.
NCT00343252 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 18-Month Endpoint in the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.
NCT00343252 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 18-Month Endpoint in European Foundation for Osteoporosis Quality of Life Instrument (QUALEFFO)
NCT00343252 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 12-Month Endpoint, European Foundation for Osteoporosis Quality of Life Instrument (QUALEFFO)
NCT00343252 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Time to First Occurrence of at Least a 30% Reduction in 24-Hour Average Back Pain up to 6 Months
NCT00343252 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Time to First Occurrence of at Least a 30% Reduction in 24-Hour Average Back Pain up to 12 Months
NCT00343252 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Time to First Occurrence of at Least 30% Reduction in 24-Hour Worst Back Pain up to 6 Months
NCT00343252 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Safety) During 18 Months
NCT00343252 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Safety) During 12 Months
NCT00343252 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants Responding With at Least a 30% Reduction in 24-Hour Worst Back Pain Severity at the 6-Month Endpoint
NCT00343252 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants Responding With at Least a 30% Reduction in 24-Hour Worst Back Pain Severity at the 18-Month Endpoint
NCT00343252 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants Responding With at Least a 30% Reduction in 24-Hour Worst Back Pain Severity at the 12-Month Endpoint
NCT00343252 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants Responding With at Least a 30% Reduction in 24-Hour Average Back Pain Severity at the 6-Month Endpoint
NCT00343252 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants Responding With at Least a 30% Reduction in 24-Hour Average Back Pain Severity at the 18-Month Endpoint
NCT00343252 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants Responding With at Least a 30% Reduction in 24-Hour Average Back Pain Severity at the 12-Month Endpoint
NCT00393380 (8) [back to overview]Median Time to Neutrophil Engraftment (Defined as an Absolute Neutrophil Count [ANC] Greater Than 500)
NCT00393380 (8) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival
NCT00393380 (8) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of Relapse
NCT00393380 (8) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of Acute GVHD Grades II-IV at Day 100
NCT00393380 (8) [back to overview]100-day Transplant-related Mortality
NCT00393380 (8) [back to overview]Platelet Engraftment (Greater Than 20,000)
NCT00393380 (8) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD
NCT00393380 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00414973 (6) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline to 24 Week Endpoint in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Men
NCT00414973 (6) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline to 24 Week Endpoint in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Postmenopausal Women
NCT00414973 (6) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline to 24 Week Endpoint in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Men
NCT00414973 (6) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline to 24 Week Endpoint in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Postmenopausal Women
NCT00414973 (6) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks in Osteocalcin, Men
NCT00414973 (6) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks in Osteocalcin, Postmenopausal Women
NCT00433160 (20) [back to overview]Percent Change in Biochemical Markers of Bone Metabolism - Serum Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BAP) During Open Label Phases at 76 Weeks and 104 Weeks
NCT00433160 (20) [back to overview]Vertebral Fractures by Central X-ray Assessment
NCT00433160 (20) [back to overview]Percent Change in Biochemical Markers of Bone Metabolism - Serum Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BAP)
NCT00433160 (20) [back to overview]Fractures by Investigators Assessment
NCT00433160 (20) [back to overview]Back Pain Severity During Open Label Phases at 76 Weeks and 104 Weeks
NCT00433160 (20) [back to overview]Back Pain Severity
NCT00433160 (20) [back to overview]Vertebral Fractures by Central X-ray Assessment During Entire Study Period of 104 Weeks
NCT00433160 (20) [back to overview]Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density at Lumbar Spine (L2-L4) During Open Label Phases at 76 Weeks and 104 Weeks
NCT00433160 (20) [back to overview]Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density at Lumbar Spine (L2-L4)
NCT00433160 (20) [back to overview]Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Total Hip During Open Label Phases at 76 Weeks and 104 Weeks
NCT00433160 (20) [back to overview]Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Total Hip
NCT00433160 (20) [back to overview]Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Lumbar Spine (L1-L4) During Open Label Phases at 76 Weeks and 104 Weeks
NCT00433160 (20) [back to overview]Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Lumbar Spine (L1-L4)
NCT00433160 (20) [back to overview]Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Femoral Neck During Open Label Phases at 76 Weeks and 104 Weeks
NCT00433160 (20) [back to overview]Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Femoral Neck
NCT00433160 (20) [back to overview]Percent Change in Biochemical Markers of Bone Metabolism - Serum Type I Collagen Crosslinked C-telopeptide (CTX) During Open Label Phases at 76 Weeks and 104 Weeks
NCT00433160 (20) [back to overview]Percent Change in Biochemical Markers of Bone Metabolism - Serum Type I Collagen Crosslinked C-telopeptide (CTX)
NCT00433160 (20) [back to overview]Percent Change in Biochemical Markers of Bone Metabolism - Serum Procollagen I N-terminal Propeptide (PINP) During Open Label Phases at 76 Weeks and 104 Weeks
NCT00433160 (20) [back to overview]Percent Change in Biochemical Markers of Bone Metabolism - Serum Procollagen I N-terminal Propeptide (PINP)
NCT00433160 (20) [back to overview]Fractures by Investigators Assessment During Entire Study Period of 104 Weeks
NCT00439244 (5) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 52
NCT00439244 (5) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 13, Week 26 and Week 52
NCT00439244 (5) [back to overview]Bone Resorption and Formation Biochemical Markers : Beta C-terminal Telopeptides of Type I Collagen (β-CTx)
NCT00439244 (5) [back to overview]Bone Resorption and Formation Biochemical Markers : N-terminal Propeptide of Type I Collagen (P1NP)
NCT00439244 (5) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 13 and Week 26
NCT00471237 (25) [back to overview]Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover: Levels of C-terminal Telopeptide α1 Chain of Type 1 Collagen (CTX1)
NCT00471237 (25) [back to overview]Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover: Levels of C-terminal Telopeptide α1 Chain of Type 1 Collagen (CTX1)
NCT00471237 (25) [back to overview]Number of Participant With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings Reported as Adverse Event
NCT00471237 (25) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hypercalcemia
NCT00471237 (25) [back to overview]Number of Participants Withdrew Due to Hypercalcemia
NCT00471237 (25) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Marrow Density (BMD) at Month 12 Measured by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Scans of the Lumbar Spine (L1-L4)
NCT00471237 (25) [back to overview]Maximum Blood Concentration (Cmax) of Ronacaleret
NCT00471237 (25) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 in the Total Vertebra Integral VOI at the Lumbar Spine as Measured by QCT Scans
NCT00471237 (25) [back to overview]Number of Participant With Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Any Post-baseline Visit
NCT00471237 (25) [back to overview]Number of Participant With Laboratory Abnormalities of Potential Clinical Concern at Any Post-baseline Visit
NCT00471237 (25) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Remained the Same or Had Any Improvement in DXA BMD (> Baseline)
NCT00471237 (25) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline to Months 6 and 12 in BMD Measured by DXA Scans of the Hip (Total Hip, Femoral Neck and Trochanter).
NCT00471237 (25) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Cortical Thickness at the Hip as Measured by QCT Scans
NCT00471237 (25) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 in the Volumetric Integral, Cortical, and Trabecular Density (BMD) at the Hip and Lumbar Spine as Measured by Quantitative Computer Tomography (QCT) Scans
NCT00471237 (25) [back to overview]Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover: Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BALP)
NCT00471237 (25) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 in the Volumetric Integral, Cortical, and Trabecular Density (BMD) at the Hip as Measured by QCT Scans
NCT00471237 (25) [back to overview]Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover: Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BALP)
NCT00471237 (25) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC 0-t) and Area Under the Concentration-time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC 0-tau) of Ronacaleret
NCT00471237 (25) [back to overview]Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover: Procollagen Type 1 N-terminal Propeptide (P1NP)
NCT00471237 (25) [back to overview]Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover: Procollagen Type 1 N-terminal Propeptide (P1NP)
NCT00471237 (25) [back to overview]Blood Concentrations of Ronacaleret
NCT00471237 (25) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Weight
NCT00471237 (25) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Height
NCT00471237 (25) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline to Month 6 in BMD Measured by DXA Scans of the Lumbar Spine (L1-L4)
NCT00471237 (25) [back to overview]Time Required to Achieve Maximum Concentration of Ronacaleret in Blood (Tmax)
NCT00473265 (6) [back to overview]Mineralizing Surface
NCT00473265 (6) [back to overview]Percent Change in BMD From Baseline to 24 Months by DXA
NCT00473265 (6) [back to overview]Requirements for Calcium Supplementation
NCT00473265 (6) [back to overview]Cortical Porosity
NCT00473265 (6) [back to overview]Trabecular Width
NCT00473265 (6) [back to overview]Trabecular Number
NCT00489918 (5) [back to overview]Percent Change in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density: Baseline to Week 12
NCT00489918 (5) [back to overview]Percent Change in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density: Baseline to Week 24
NCT00489918 (5) [back to overview]Percent Change in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD): Baseline to Week 24
NCT00489918 (5) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Lumbar Spine BMD: Baseline to Week 12
NCT00489918 (5) [back to overview]Percent Change in Femoral Neck BMD: Baseline to Week 24
NCT00503399 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in High Resolution Quantitative Computerized Technology (HR-QCT) of Integral and Trabecular Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the 12th Thoracic Vertebra (T12) at 6 Months and 18 Months
NCT00503399 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Aminoterminal Propeptide of Type I Procollagen (P1NP) at 3 Months, 6 Months, and 18 Months
NCT00503399 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT00503399 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Volumetric Trabecular Bone Mineral Density (BMD) by Quantitative Computerized Tomography (QCT) at 18 Months
NCT00503399 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Type I Collagen Degradation Fragments (β-CTx) at 3 Months, 6 Months, and 18 Months
NCT00503399 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Volumetric Trabecular Bone Mineral Density (BMD) by Quantitative Computerized Technology (QCT) at 6 Months
NCT00503399 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Anterior Bending and Axial Torsion by Finite Element Analysis in the 12th Thoracic Vertebra (T12) at 6 Months and 18 Months: Stiffness and Strength
NCT00503399 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Areal Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Lumbar Spine, Femoral Neck, and Total Hip at 18 Months
NCT00503399 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Axial Compression by Finite Element Analysis in the 12th Thoracic Vertebra (T12) at 6 Months and 18 Months: Stiffness and Strength
NCT00542425 (5) [back to overview]Change in Bone Mineral Density, Femoral Neck.
NCT00542425 (5) [back to overview]Change in Bone Mineral Density, Total Hip.
NCT00542425 (5) [back to overview]Change in Marker of Bone Metabolism, PINP
NCT00542425 (5) [back to overview]Change in Bone Mineral Density, Total Spine.
NCT00542425 (5) [back to overview]Change in Bone Mineral Density, Total Spine.
NCT00557310 (17) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in the Estimate of Bone Strength of Lumbar Spine at Month 18 Endpoint
NCT00557310 (17) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Hip at Month 18 Endpoint
NCT00557310 (17) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Lumbar Spine at Month 18 Endpoint
NCT00557310 (17) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Areal BMD at the Femoral Neck at Month 18 and 24 Endpoint
NCT00557310 (17) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Areal BMD at the Lumbar Spine at Month 18 and 24 Endpoint
NCT00557310 (17) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Areal BMD at Ultra-Distal Radius at Month 18 and 24 Endpoint
NCT00557310 (17) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Areal BMD Responses at Total Hip at Month 18 and 24 Endpoint
NCT00557310 (17) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Volume (BV)/Total Volume (TV) Ratio in the Distal Radius at Month 18 and 24 Endpoint
NCT00557310 (17) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Cortical Thickness (CT) in the Distal Radius at Month 18 and 24 Endpoint
NCT00557310 (17) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Carboxyterminal Cross-Linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTX) at Month 3, 6 and 24 Endpoint
NCT00557310 (17) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Procollagen Type I N-Terminal Propeptide (PINP) at Month 3, 6 and 24 Endpoint
NCT00557310 (17) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Surface-to-Curve Ratio (SCR) at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 Endpoint
NCT00557310 (17) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Topological Erosion Index (TEI) in the Distal Radius at Month 18 and 24 Endpoint
NCT00557310 (17) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Surface-to-Curve Ratio (SCR) in the Distal Radius at Month 18 Endpoint
NCT00557310 (17) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Surface-to-Curve Ratio (SCR) in the Distal Radius at Month 24 Endpoint
NCT00557310 (17) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in the Estimate of Bone Strength of Hip at Month 18 Endpoint
NCT00557310 (17) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Areal BMD at ⅓ Distal Radius at Month 18 and 24 Endpoint
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Subject Perceptions (Attributes) Assessments - Easy to Hold the Pen While Injecting
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Subject Preference Assessments - Assurance That Drug is Delivered
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Subject Preference Assessments - Attaching a New Needle
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Subject Preference Assessments - Force on the Plunger Needed to Inject a Dose
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Subject Preference Assessments - Injecting a Dose
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Subject Preference Assessments - Learning to Use the Pen
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Subject Preference Assessments - Overall Ease of Use
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Subject Preference Assessments - Overall Preference
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Subject Preference Assessments - Removing a Used Needle
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Subject Preference Assessments - Setting the Dose
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Subject Preference Assessments - Use of the User Manual/Instructions for Use That Came With the Pen
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Forteo B Pen Complaints at 46 Weeks
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Forteo B Pen Complaints at 8 Weeks
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Forteo B Pen Complaints at 46 Weeks
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - Easy to Remove Pen From Package
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - Easy to Remove The Pen Cap
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - Easy to Remove a Used Needle
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - Easy to Read Label
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - Easy to Push the Black Injections Button to Administer the Dose
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - Easy to Learn to Use the Pen
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - Easy to Attach a New Needle
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - Convenient for Me to Use
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Subject Perception (Attibutes) Assessments - Easy to Replace The Pen Cap
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Forteo B Pen Complaints at 8 Weeks
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - Easy to Set the Dose
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - Easy to Use the Forteo B Pen Instructions For Use
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - Helps Me Manage My Osteoporosis At Home
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - Helps Me Manage My Osteoporosis Away From Home
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - How Confident Are You That You Receive the Medication With Your Forteo B Pen
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - Overall Ease of Use
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - Reduces My Reluctance to Take Injections
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - Reusing Needles
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - To What Extent Are You Satisfied With the Forteo B Pen
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - What Could Be Done to Improve the Forteo B Pen Instructions For Use
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - When Do You Attach a Needle
NCT00577863 (36) [back to overview]Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - When Do You Remove the Needle
NCT00594906 (1) [back to overview]Healing of a Fracture From a Low Energy Fall
NCT00697463 (1) [back to overview]Change in Lumbar Spine Bone Density by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA)
NCT00754442 (2) [back to overview]The Level of Activated Vitamin D (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D) After Parathyroid Hormone Infusion at Baseline, 4 and 8 Hours
NCT00754442 (2) [back to overview]The Number of Patients With Mutations in CYP27B1
NCT00759772 (1) [back to overview]Percent Change in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density
NCT00826228 (2) [back to overview]BMD at Left Total Hip
NCT00826228 (2) [back to overview]P1NP
NCT00853723 (13) [back to overview]Total Serum Calcium (mg/dl)
NCT00853723 (13) [back to overview]Tubular Maximum for Phosphorous/Glomerular Filtration Rate (TMP/GFR)
NCT00853723 (13) [back to overview]24 Hour Urine Calcium
NCT00853723 (13) [back to overview]Serum Phosphorous
NCT00853723 (13) [back to overview]Fractional Excretion of Calcium
NCT00853723 (13) [back to overview]Procallagen-1 Amino-terminal Peptide (P1NP)
NCT00853723 (13) [back to overview]Changes in Bone Mineral Density of the Lumbar Spine.
NCT00853723 (13) [back to overview]Changes in Bone Mineral Density of the Forearm.
NCT00853723 (13) [back to overview]Changes in Bone Mineral Density of the Femoral Neck.
NCT00853723 (13) [back to overview]Changes in Bone Mineral Density of the Distal 1/3 Radius.
NCT00853723 (13) [back to overview]Changes in Bone Mineral Density of the Total Hip.
NCT00853723 (13) [back to overview]1,25 Vitamin D
NCT00853723 (13) [back to overview]Carboxy-terminal Telopeptides of Collagen-1 (CTX)
NCT00887354 (7) [back to overview]Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
NCT00887354 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reporting Hip Pain in Modification of the Charnley's Pain Scale
NCT00887354 (7) [back to overview]Change in Lumbar Spine Areal Bone Mineral Density
NCT00887354 (7) [back to overview]Change in Areal Bone Mineral Density Measured at the Femoral Neck and Total Hip of the Non-Fractured Limb
NCT00887354 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Physical Component Summary of the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Questionnaire
NCT00887354 (7) [back to overview]"Timed Up and Go Test"
NCT00887354 (7) [back to overview]Change in Lumbar Spine Areal Bone Mineral Density (BMD)
NCT00896532 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline at Month 6 in BMD of the Femoral Neck
NCT00896532 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline at Month 6 in BMD at the Lumbar Spine
NCT00896532 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12 in BMD of the Total Hip
NCT00896532 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12 in BMD of the Femoral Neck
NCT00896532 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12 in BMD of the Distal Radius
NCT00896532 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12 in BMD at the Lumbar Spine
NCT00896532 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Procollagen Type 1 N-telopeptide (P1NP)
NCT00896532 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline at Month 6 in BMD of the Total Hip
NCT00896532 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Procollagen Type 1 N-telopeptide (P1NP)
NCT00896532 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Osteocalcin
NCT00896532 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Type 1 Collagen C-telopeptide (CTX)
NCT00896532 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Type 1 Collagen C-telopeptide (CTX)
NCT00896532 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Osteocalcin
NCT00896532 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP)
NCT00896532 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP)
NCT00926380 (1) [back to overview]Change in Spine Bone Density From Baseline to 2 Years
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Percentage of Eroded Surface/Bone Surface (ES/BS) in the Endocortical Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 and 24 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Percentage of Osteoid Surface (OS)/Bone Surface (BS) in the Endocortical Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 and 24 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Total Formation Period (Tt.FP) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Total Formation Period (Tt.FP) in the Endocortical Compartment (EC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 and 24 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Wall Thickness (WTh.) in the Endocortical Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 and 24 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Total Formation Period (Tt.FP) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Average Length of Tetracycline Double Labels in the Cancellous Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Average Length of Tetracycline Double Labels in the Cancellous Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Carboxyterminal Cross-Linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTX) at Month 12 Endpoint
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Osteocalcin (OC) at Month 12 Endpoint
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Procollagen Type I N-Terminal Propeptide (PINP) at Month 12 Endpoint
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Mineralizing Surface/Bone Surface (MS/BS) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Mineralizing Surface/Bone Surface (MS/BS) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Osteoid Thickness (OTh.) in the Cancellous Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Osteoid Thickness (OTh.) in the Cancellous Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Percentage of Eroded Surface/Bone Surface (ES/BS) in the Cancellous Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Percentage of Eroded Surface/Bone Surface (ES/BS) in the Cancellous Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Percentage of Osteoid Surface (OS)/Bone Surface (BS) in the Cancellous Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Percentage of Osteoid Surface (OS)/Bone Surface (BS) in the Cancellous Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Percentage of Osteoid Volume (OV)/Bone Volume (BV) in the Cancellous Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Percentage of Osteoid Volume (OV)/Bone Volume (BV) in the Cancellous Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Wall Thickness (WTh.) in the Cancellous Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Wall Thickness (WTh.) in the Cancellous Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Activation Frequency (Ac.f) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Activation Frequency (Ac.f) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Activation Frequency (Ac.f) in the Endocortical Compartment (EC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 and 24 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Active Formation Period (a.FP) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Active Formation Period (a.FP) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Active Formation Period (a.FP) in the Endocortical Compartment (EC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 and 24 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Adjusted Apposition Rate (Aj.AR) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Adjusted Apposition Rate (Aj.AR) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Adjusted Apposition Rate (Aj.AR) in the Endocortical Compartment (EC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 and 24 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Average Length of Tetracycline Double Labels in the Endocortical Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 and 24 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Bone Formation Rate (BFR) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Bone Formation Rate (BFR) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Bone Formation Rate (BFR) in the Endocortical Compartment (EC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 and 24 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Carboxyterminal Cross-Linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTX) at Month 1, 3 and 6 Endpoint
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Osteocalcin (OC) at Month 1, 3, and 6 Endpoint
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Procollagen Type I N-Terminal Propeptide (PINP) at Month 1, 3 and 6 Endpoint
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Mineral Apposition Rate (MAR) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Mineral Apposition Rate (MAR) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Mineral Apposition Rate (MAR) in the Endocortical Compartment (EC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 and 24 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Mineralization Lag Time (Mlt) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Mineralization Lag Time (Mlt) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Mineralization Lag Time (Mlt) in the Endocortical Compartment (EC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 and 24 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Mineralizing Surface/Bone Surface(MS/BS) in the Endocortical Compartment (EC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 and 24 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Number of Samples With Single or Double Tetracycline Labels, Single and Double Labels, or No Tetracycline Labels in the Cancellous Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Number of Samples With Single or Double Tetracycline Labels, Single and Double Labels, or No Tetracycline Labels in the Cancellous Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Number of Samples With Single or Double Tetracycline Labels, Single and Double Labels, or No Tetracycline Labels in the Endocortical Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 and 24 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Osteoid Maturation Time (Omt) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Osteoid Maturation Time (Omt) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Osteoid Maturation Time (Omt) in the Endocortical Compartment (EC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 and 24 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Osteoid Thickness (OTh.) in the Endocortical Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 and 24 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Percent of Single or Double Tetracycline Labels Per Bone Surface (sLS/BS), (dLS/BS) in the Cancellous Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Percent of Single or Double Tetracycline Labels Per Bone Surface (sLS/BS), (dLS/BS) in the Cancellous Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months
NCT00927186 (56) [back to overview]Percent of Single or Double Tetracycline Labels Per Bone Surface (sLS/BS), (dLS/BS) in the Endocortical Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 and 24 Months
NCT01011556 (14) [back to overview]Time Course Change of BMD Response at the Lumbar Spine
NCT01011556 (14) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at 6 Months
NCT01011556 (14) [back to overview]Change From Pre-dose to Postdose in Supine and Standing Heart Rate at Baseline (BL) and 12 Months (Mon).
NCT01011556 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Urine Calcium Excretion at 6 and 12 Months
NCT01011556 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) Specific Antibody Levels
NCT01011556 (14) [back to overview]Change From Pre-dose and Postdose Supine and Standing SBP and DBP at Baseline (BL) and 12 Months (Mon)
NCT01011556 (14) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Procollagen Type 1 C-Propeptide (P1CP) at 1 Month
NCT01011556 (14) [back to overview]Change in Serum Calcium With and Without Adjustments for Serum Albumin From Predose to After 4 and 6 Hours
NCT01011556 (14) [back to overview]Convenience/Ease of Use Questionnaire (CEUQ)
NCT01011556 (14) [back to overview]DRAIZE Edema Assessment at Baseline Through 13 Month Follow-up
NCT01011556 (14) [back to overview]DRAIZE Erythema Assessment at Baseline Through 13 Month Follow-up
NCT01011556 (14) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline of C-Terminal Telopeptide (CTX)
NCT01011556 (14) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Procollagen Type 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP)
NCT01011556 (14) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at 12 Months
NCT01078805 (8) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Bone Area at Month 24 Endpoint
NCT01078805 (8) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Content (BMC) at Month 24 Endpoint
NCT01078805 (8) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Month 24 Endpoint
NCT01078805 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Clinical Vertebral Fractures
NCT01078805 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Non-Vertebral Fragility Fractures
NCT01078805 (8) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Back Pain Score by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 24 Month Endpoint
NCT01078805 (8) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Pain Score by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 24 Month Endpoint
NCT01078805 (8) [back to overview]Treatment Adherence
NCT01153425 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Change in Bone Volume Fraction (BVF)
NCT01153425 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Change in Trabecular Surface-to-curve Ratio
NCT01166958 (5) [back to overview]Average Bone Mineral Density of the One-third Radius at Baseline, 3 Months and 6 Months
NCT01166958 (5) [back to overview]Average Bone Mineral Density of the Proximal Femur (Hip) at Baseline, 3 Months and 6 Months
NCT01166958 (5) [back to overview]Serum Markers of Skeletal Turnover (Serum P1NP)
NCT01166958 (5) [back to overview]Average Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Baseline, 3 Months and 6 Months
NCT01166958 (5) [back to overview]Serum Markers of Skeletal Turnover (Serum CTX)
NCT01171690 (2) [back to overview]Safety Analysis
NCT01171690 (2) [back to overview]Hospital Length of Stay
NCT01225055 (6) [back to overview]C-terminal Telopeptide
NCT01225055 (6) [back to overview]Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase
NCT01225055 (6) [back to overview]Amino-terminal Propeptide of Type 1 Collagen
NCT01225055 (6) [back to overview]Bone Mineral Density BMD of the Total Hip as Assessed by DXA.
NCT01225055 (6) [back to overview]Bone Mineral Density (BMD) by DXA at the Lumbar Spine.
NCT01225055 (6) [back to overview]Bone Mineral Density (BMD) by DXA at Femoral Neck
NCT01250145 (4) [back to overview]Part B - Skin Irritation and Sensitization by Draize Score
NCT01250145 (4) [back to overview]Part B - Patch Adhesion Score
NCT01250145 (4) [back to overview]Part A - Patch Adhesion Score
NCT01250145 (4) [back to overview]Part A - Cumulative Skin Irritation by Draize Score
NCT01279187 (5) [back to overview]Bone Turnover: Cortical Tissue Area
NCT01279187 (5) [back to overview]Bone Turnover: Bone Perimeter Length
NCT01279187 (5) [back to overview]Bone Turnover: Bone Percentages
NCT01279187 (5) [back to overview]Bone Formation Rate
NCT01279187 (5) [back to overview]Bone Turnover (Mineral Apposition Rates)
NCT01292252 (3) [back to overview]Patient Reported Outcomes Measured by: Visual Analog Score (VAS), European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Scores at 1 Year
NCT01292252 (3) [back to overview]Quality of Spine Fusion, Measured by the Number of Participants With Complete Spine Fusion at 1 Year
NCT01292252 (3) [back to overview]Adverse Effects
NCT01321723 (5) [back to overview]% Change From Baseline BMD in L1-L4 Axial Lumbar Spine at Week 24
NCT01321723 (5) [back to overview]% Change From Baseline in Bone Formation Marker (P1NP) at Week 24
NCT01321723 (5) [back to overview]% Change From Baseline in Bone Resorption Marker (CTx-1) at Week 24
NCT01321723 (5) [back to overview]Systemic Absorption of PTH at Week 24
NCT01321723 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With AEs as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
NCT01343004 (6) [back to overview]Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Lumbar Spine From Baseline to 18 Months
NCT01343004 (6) [back to overview]Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total Hip From Baseline to Month 18
NCT01343004 (6) [back to overview]Number of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Associated With Hypercalcemia at 18 Months
NCT01343004 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With New Vertebral Fractures at 18 Months
NCT01343004 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Non-vertebral Fractures at 18 Months
NCT01343004 (6) [back to overview]Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Femoral Neck From Baseline to Month 18
NCT01400516 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Joint Erosion Volume Measured by 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography (3D CT) Scan
NCT01400516 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 Joint Count C-Reactive Protein (DAS-28 CRP)
NCT01400516 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Measured by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) and Instant Vertebral Assessment (IVA) Scan
NCT01430104 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serum Calcium Level Over 11.0 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL)
NCT01430104 (9) [back to overview]Mean Serum Calcium Levels
NCT01430104 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serum Calcium Level Over 11.0 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL) and 13.5 mg/dL, Respectively at Any Time Postbaseline
NCT01430104 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Daily Urine Calcium Excreted Over 0.3 Grams Per Day (g/Day) at Any Time Postbaseline
NCT01430104 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Daily Urine Calcium Excreted
NCT01430104 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Calcium
NCT01430104 (9) [back to overview]Concentrations of Serum 1,25-Hydroxy-2-Vitamin D3
NCT01430104 (9) [back to overview]Concentrations of Serum 25-Hydroxy-Vitamin D
NCT01430104 (9) [back to overview]Mean Daily Urine Calcium Excreted
NCT01440803 (1) [back to overview]Change in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (LS-BMD) on Active Medication
NCT01473589 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With No Revision Surgery at 12 Months After Internal Fixation of a Low-Trauma Femoral Neck Fracture
NCT01473589 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Regain Their Prefracture Ambulatory Status
NCT01473589 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Functional Evidence of Healing
NCT01473589 (14) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to 6 Months in Gait Speed
NCT01473589 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Radiographic Evidence of Healing
NCT01473589 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Pain Control During Ambulation
NCT01473589 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Able to Ambulate
NCT01473589 (14) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to 6 Months on European Quality of Life Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Health State Score
NCT01473589 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Without Severe Fracture-Site Pain During Weight Bearing
NCT01473589 (14) [back to overview]Time to Revision Surgery
NCT01473589 (14) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to 6 Months in Worst Fracture-Site Pain
NCT01473589 (14) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to 6 Months on Short Form-12 (SF-12) Physical (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores
NCT01473589 (14) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to 6 Months on Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
NCT01473589 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Without Severe Fracture-Site Pain During 24 Hours Prior to Visit
NCT01473602 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Without Severe Fracture-Site Pain During 24 Hours Prior to Visit
NCT01473602 (14) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to 6 Months on Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
NCT01473602 (14) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to 6 Months on European Quality of Life Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Overall Health Score
NCT01473602 (14) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to 6 Months on Short Form-12 (SF-12) Physical (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores
NCT01473602 (14) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to 6 Months in Worst Fracture-Site Pain
NCT01473602 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Able to Ambulate
NCT01473602 (14) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to 6 Months in Gait Speed
NCT01473602 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Without Severe Fracture-Site Pain During Weight Bearing
NCT01473602 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Radiographic Evidence of Healing
NCT01473602 (14) [back to overview]Time to Revision Surgery
NCT01473602 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Pain Control During Ambulation
NCT01473602 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With No Revision Surgery at 12 Months After Internal Fixation of a Low-Trauma Femoral Neck Fracture
NCT01473602 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Functional Evidence of Healing
NCT01473602 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Regained Their Prefracture Ambulatory Status
NCT01611571 (5) [back to overview]New Morphometric Vertebral Fractures
NCT01611571 (5) [back to overview]Change in Spine Bone Density
NCT01611571 (5) [back to overview]Change in FN BMD at 18 Months
NCT01611571 (5) [back to overview]Change in Forearm Bone Density
NCT01611571 (5) [back to overview]Change in Hip Bone Density
NCT01656629 (1) [back to overview]The Percent Change in Circulating Osteoprogenitor Cells as Assessed by Flow Cytometry in the Blood Before and After Treatment With Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) or Alendronate (ALN).
NCT01705587 (4) [back to overview]Radiologic Evidence of Healing
NCT01705587 (4) [back to overview]Increased Bone Density
NCT01705587 (4) [back to overview]Quality of Life Improvements
NCT01705587 (4) [back to overview]Radiologic Evidence of Bone Healing
NCT01709110 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 24 Months Endpoint in the European Quality of Life Questionnaire [EQ-5D-5L] (US)
NCT01709110 (12) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Major Non-Vertebral Fragility Fractures
NCT01709110 (12) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With New Moderate and/or Severe Vertebral Fractures
NCT01709110 (12) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With New Multiple (2 or More) Vertebral Fractures
NCT01709110 (12) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With New Vertebral Fractures
NCT01709110 (12) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Non-Vertebral Fragility Fractures
NCT01709110 (12) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Pooled Clinical Vertebral and Non-Vertebral Fragility Fractures
NCT01709110 (12) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Pooled Fragility and Traumatic Non-Vertebral Fractures
NCT01709110 (12) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Pooled New and Worsening Vertebral Fractures
NCT01709110 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 24 Months Endpoint in Back Pain Using an 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale
NCT01709110 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 24 Months Endpoint in Height
NCT01709110 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 24 Months Endpoint in the European Quality of Life Questionnaire [EQ-5D-5L] (UK)
NCT01750086 (1) [back to overview]Bone Turnover Marker (Blood Sample)
NCT01753856 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Eroded Surface/Bone Surface (ES/BS) in the CC, EC and IC of the Iliac Crest
NCT01753856 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Mineralizing Surface With Remodeling-Based Formation and Modeling-Based Formation in the CC, EC and PC of the Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies
NCT01753856 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Osteoid Surface (OS)/Bone Surface (BS) in the CC, EC and IC of the Iliac Crest
NCT01753856 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Overfilled Remodeling Sites in the CC, EC and PC of the Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies
NCT01753856 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Single or Double Tetracycline Labels Per Bone Surface (sLS/BS or dLS/BS) in the CC, EC, IC and PC of the Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies
NCT01753856 (23) [back to overview]Wall Thickness (W.Th) in the CC, EC and IC of the Iliac Crest
NCT01753856 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 3 Months in Mineralizing Surface (MS) /Bone Surface (BS) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of the Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies
NCT01753856 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Osteoid Volume (OV)/Bone Volume (BV) in the CC of the Iliac Crest
NCT01753856 (23) [back to overview]Activation Frequency (Ac.f) in the CC, EC and IC of the Iliac Crest
NCT01753856 (23) [back to overview]Adjusted Apposition Rate (Aj.AR) in the CC, EC and IC of the Iliac Crest
NCT01753856 (23) [back to overview]Average Length of DLs in the CC, EC, IC and PC of the Iliac Crest
NCT01753856 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 3 Months in Bone Formation Rate/Bone Surface (BFR/BS ) in the CC, EC, IC and PC of the Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies
NCT01753856 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 3 Months in Label Length Within Each Basic Multicellular Unit (BMU) in the CC, EC, IC and PC of the Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies
NCT01753856 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 3 Months in Mineral Apposition Rate (MAR) in the CC, EC, IC and PC of the Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies
NCT01753856 (23) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 3 Months in MS/BS in the Endocortical Compartment (EC), Intracortical Compartment (IC), and Periosteal Compartment (PC) of the Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies
NCT01753856 (23) [back to overview]MS/BS in the CC, EC, IC and PC of the Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies 3 Months Post First Dose of Study Drug
NCT01753856 (23) [back to overview]Number of Samples With Single or Double Tetracycline Labels, SL and DL, or No Tetracycline Labels in the CC, Endocortical Compartment (EC), Intracortical Compartment (IC) and Periosteal Compartment (PC) of the Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies
NCT01753856 (23) [back to overview]Osteoid Thickness (O.Th) in the CC, EC and IC of the Iliac Crest
NCT01753856 (23) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 Months in Intact Parathyroid Hormone (PTH)
NCT01753856 (23) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 Months in Serum Carboxyterminal Cross-Linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTX)
NCT01753856 (23) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 Months in Serum Osteocalcin
NCT01753856 (23) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 Months in Serum Procollagen Type I N-terminal Propeptide (P1NP)
NCT01753856 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Bone With Remodeling-Based and Modeling-Based Formations in the CC, EC and PC of the Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies
NCT01796301 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Integral BMD by QCT at the Total Hip at Month 6
NCT01796301 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 12
NCT01796301 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 6
NCT01796301 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD at Month 6
NCT01796301 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip BMD at Month 6
NCT01796301 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip Integral Bone Mineral Content (BMC) by QCT at Month 12
NCT01796301 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip Integral Bone Mineral Content (BMC) by QCT at Month 6
NCT01796301 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline Through Month 12 in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD)
NCT01796301 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Integral BMD by QCT at the Total Hip at Month 12
NCT01796301 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip BMD at Month 12
NCT01796301 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Cortical BMD by Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) at the Total Hip at Month 6
NCT01796301 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Estimated Strength at the Total Hip at Month 12
NCT01796301 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Cortical BMD by QCT at the Total Hip at Month 12
NCT01796301 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Estimated Strength at the Total Hip at Month 6
NCT01796301 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD at Month 12
NCT02023411 (2) [back to overview]SUV Max on PET/CT Scan at 12 Months
NCT02023411 (2) [back to overview]Clinical Events
NCT02025179 (6) [back to overview]Bone Mineral Density (BMD) by DXA at Femoral Neck
NCT02025179 (6) [back to overview]Bone Mineral Density (BMD) by DXA at the Lumbar Spine
NCT02025179 (6) [back to overview]Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the Total Hip as Assessed by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA)
NCT02025179 (6) [back to overview]Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase
NCT02025179 (6) [back to overview]C-terminal Telopeptide
NCT02025179 (6) [back to overview]Amino-terminal Propeptide of Type 1 Collagen
NCT02176382 (1) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Spine Bone Mineral Density by Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA)
NCT02440581 (5) [back to overview]Change in Serum Biochemical Bone Markers of Bone Activity - Parathyroid Hormone (PTH)
NCT02440581 (5) [back to overview]Change in Serum Biochemical Bone Markers of Bone Activity - Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP)
NCT02440581 (5) [back to overview]Change in Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) Bone Mineral Density of the Hip
NCT02440581 (5) [back to overview]Change in Coronary Artery Calcifications by Multiple Detector Computed Tomography (MDCT)
NCT02440581 (5) [back to overview]Change in Serum Biochemical Bone Markers of Bone Activity - Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 (FGF23)
NCT02972424 (5) [back to overview]Functional Outcome Using a Battery That Includes Walking Speed, Repeated Chair Stands, and Balance at 3 Months
NCT02972424 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Evidence of Cortical Bridging for Fracture Healing
NCT02972424 (5) [back to overview]Pain at 12 Months Based on the Numeric Rating Scale
NCT02972424 (5) [back to overview]Physical Function at 12 Months Using a Battery That Includes Walking Speed, Repeated Chair Stands, and Balance
NCT02972424 (5) [back to overview]Change in Pain by Numeric Rating Scale Between Baseline and Three Months
NCT04026256 (1) [back to overview]Cancellous Bone Formation Rate at Month 3

Change From Baseline at 18 Month Endpoint in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD)

change from baseline at endpoint in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine as assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (NCT00051558)
Timeframe: 18 month endpoint

Interventiongrams per square centimeters (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide0.059
Alendronate0.028

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at 18 Month Endpoint in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Female Subset

change from baseline at endpoint in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine as assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (NCT00051558)
Timeframe: 18 month endpoint

Interventiongrams per square centimeters (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide0.056
Alendronate0.023

[back to top]

Any Fracture, Nonvertebral Fractures, Vertebral Fractures, Clinical Vertebral Fractures, and Severity Fractures

Clinical vertebral fracture was defined as a radiographically confirmed fracture that was associated with symptoms such as back pain. (NCT00051558)
Timeframe: 36 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any FractureNonvertebral FractureVertebral FractureClinical Vertebral FractureNonvertebral Fragility FractureSeverity-Radiographic Vertebral Fracture: MildSeverity-Radiographic Vertebral Fracture: ModerateSeverity-Radiographic Vertebral Fracture: Severe
Alendronate27151345724
Teriparatide1916309120

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined

change from baseline in bone mineral density of the femoral neck as assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (NCT00051558)
Timeframe: 18, 24, 36 months, and 18 and 36 month endpoints

,
Interventiongrams per square centimeters (Least Squares Mean)
Change, baseline to 36 month endpoint(N=185,N=177)Change from baseline at 36 months(N=120,N=113)Change from baseline at 24 months(N=135,N=131)Change, baseline to 18 month endpoint(N=185,N=176)Change from baseline at 18 months (N=156,N=145)
Alendronate0.0170.0210.0150.0140.017
Teriparatide0.0330.0410.0300.0240.028

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined

change from baseline in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine as assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (NCT00051558)
Timeframe: 24 and 36 months and Endpoint at 36 months

,
Interventiongrams per square centimeters (Least Squares Mean)
Change, baseline to 36 month endpoint(N=198,N=195)Change from baseline at 36 months (N=123, N=112)Change from baseline at 24 months (N=136, N=131)
Alendronate0.0340.0440.043
Teriparatide0.0730.0900.081

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined

change from baseline in bone mineral density of the total hip as assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (NCT00051558)
Timeframe: 18, 24, 36 months, and 18 and 36 month endpoints

,
Interventiongrams per square centimeters (Least Squares Mean)
Change, baseline to 36 month endpoint(N=185,N=177)Change from baseline at 36 months(N=120,N=113)Change from baseline at 24 months(N=135,N=131)Change, baseline to 18 month endpoint(N=185,N=176)Change from baseline at 18 months (N=156,N=144)
Alendronate0.0170.0200.0180.0170.018
Teriparatide0.0320.0370.0340.0260.027

[back to top]

Time Course of Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers in Subset of Patients - Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase

(NCT00051558)
Timeframe: 1, 6, 18, and 36 months

,
Interventionpercent (Mean)
Percent change from baseline at Month 1(N=65,N=78)Percent change from baseline at Month 6(N=66,N=76)Percent change from baseline at Month18(N=54,N=65)Percent change from baseline at Month36(N=44,N=49)
Alendronate0.5-7.2-4.120.6
Teriparatide35.052.334.444.7

[back to top]

Time Course of Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers in Subset of Patients - Osteocalcin

(NCT00051558)
Timeframe: 1, 6, 18, and 36 months

,
Interventionpercent (Mean)
Percent change from baseline at Month1(N=94,N=100)Percent change from baseline at Month 6(N=84,N=88)Percent change from baseline at Month18(N=77,N=77)Percent change from baseline at Month36(N=56,N=58)
Alendronate-5.2-33.6-25.0-19.6
Teriparatide147.1120.0108.962.1

[back to top]

Time Course of Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers in Subset of Patients - Serum C-terminal Propeptide of Type 1 Procollagen

(NCT00051558)
Timeframe: 1, 6, 18, and 36 months

,
Interventionpercent (Mean)
Percent change from baseline at Month 1(N=66,N=78)Percent change from baseline at Month 6(N=67,N=76)Percent change from baseline at Month18(N=55,N=65)Percent change from baseline at Month36(N=45,N=49)
Alendronate-8.8-22.3-21.3-15.4
Teriparatide48.210.55.1-1.3

[back to top]

Time Course of Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers in Subset of Patients - Serum N-terminal Propeptide of Type 1 Procollagen

(NCT00051558)
Timeframe: 1, 6, 18, and 36 months

,
Interventionpercent (Mean)
Percent change from baseline at Month 1(N=98,N=99)Percent change from baseline at Month 6(N=86,N=85)Percent change from baseline at Month18(N=77,N=76)Percent change from baseline at Month36(N=59,N=57)
Alendronate-14.8-43.2-35.8-20.2
Teriparatide107.0130.886.361.7

[back to top]

Time Course of Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers in Subset of Patients - Serum Type 1 Collagen Degradation Fragments

(NCT00051558)
Timeframe: 1, 6, 18, and 36 months

,
Interventionpercent (Mean)
Percent change from baseline at Month 1(N=70,N=79)Percent change from baseline at Month 6(N=66,N=75)Percent change from baseline at Month18(N=64,N=71)Percent change from baseline at Month36(N=49,N=48)
Alendronate-38.6-42.4-47.5-16.2
Teriparatide29.066.829.130.7

[back to top]

Time Course of Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined

change from baseline in bone mineral density of the femoral neck as assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (NCT00051558)
Timeframe: 12, 18, 24, and 36 months

,
Interventiongrams per square centimeters (Least Squares Mean)
Change from baseline at Month 36 (N=120,N=113)Change from baseline at Month 24 (N=135,N=131)Change from baseline at Month 18 (N=156,N=145)Change from baseline at Month 12 (N=167,N=158)
Alendronate0.0210.0150.0170.012
Teriparatide0.0410.0300.0280.026

[back to top]

Time Course of Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Female Subset

change from baseline in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine as assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (NCT00051558)
Timeframe: 3, 6, 12, and 18 months

,
Interventiongrams per square centimeters (Least Squares Mean)
Change from baseline at Month 18 (N=127,N=119)Change from baseline at Month 12 (N=139,N=129)Change from baseline at Month 6 (N=147,N=139)Change from baseline at Month 3 (N=149,N=150)
Alendronate0.0270.0240.0150.012
Teriparatide0.0620.0520.0310.017

[back to top]

Time Course of Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined

change from baseline in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine as assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (NCT00051558)
Timeframe: 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 months

,
Interventiongrams per square centimeters (Least Squares Mean)
Change from baseline at Month 36 (N=123,N=112)Change from baseline at Month 24 (N=136,N=131)Change from baseline at Month 18 (N=156,N=148)Change from baseline at Month 12 (N=170,N=159)Change from baseline at Month 6 (N=178,N=173)Change from baseline at Month 3 (N=183,N=184)
Alendronate0.0440.0430.0310.0280.0180.012
Teriparatide0.0900.0810.0660.0540.0340.019

[back to top]

Time Course of Change From Baseline in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Women and Men Combined

change from baseline in bone mineral density of the total hip as assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (NCT00051558)
Timeframe: 12, 18, 24, and 36 months

,
Interventiongrams per square centimeters (Least Squares Mean)
Change from baseline at 36 Months (N=120, N=113)Change from baseline at 24 Months (N=135, N=131)Change from baseline at 18 Months (N=156, N=145)Change from baseline at 12 Months (N=167, N=158)
Alendronate0.0200.0180.0180.014
Teriparatide0.0370.0340.0270.022

[back to top]

Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD)

bone density by dual energy xray absorptiometry (NCT00131469)
Timeframe: baseline and 18 months

Interventionpercentage of change in g/cm2 (Mean)
Teriparatide (FORTEO)6.1
Placebo2.8

[back to top]

Total Hip BMD

bone density by dual energy xray absorptiometry (NCT00131469)
Timeframe: baseline and 18 months

Interventionpercentage of change in g/cm2 (Mean)
Teriparatide (FORTEO)2.6
Placebo-2.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Whole Skeleton Skeletal Plasma Clearance of 99m Technetium Methylene Diphosphonate (99m Tc-MDP) to 18 Months

Skeletal plasma clearance is defined as the volume of plasma cleared of tracer (99m Tc-MDP) by the skeleton per unit time (milliliter/minute). Kbone is the rate constant representing plasma clearance of tracer to bone. The Patlak plot method was used to evaluate whole skeleton 99mTc-MDP skeletal plasma clearance (Kbone). (NCT00259298)
Timeframe: baseline, 18 months

Interventionpercentage of change of plasma clearance (Median)
Teriparatide33.75

[back to top]

Change in Qualitative Visual Scores of Focal Uptake of 99m Technetium Methylene Diphosphonate (99m Tc-MDP) in the Whole Skeleton

Changes in focal uptake (localized, defined areas of uptake) were visually scored and compared to baseline or other post-baseline assessments. Changes were rated on a scale from 0-4: 0=no clinically significant focal areas of skeletal uptake; 1=focal areas affecting <1% of skeleton; 2=focal areas affecting >=5% of skeleton; 3=focal areas affecting >=20% of skeleton; 4=focal areas affecting >=50% of skeleton. (NCT00259298)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months, 18 months, 24 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
focal change, baseline to 3 months, n=10focal change, baseline to 18 months, n=10focal change, baseline to 24 months, n=9focal change, 3 months to 18 months, n=10focal change, 18 months to 24 months, n=9
Teriparatide0.10.1000

[back to top]

Change in Skeletal Plasma Clearance of 99m Technetium Methylene Diphosphonate (99m Tc-MDP) in the Whole Skeleton, Skull, Mandible, Spine, Pelvis, Upper Extremities, and Lower Extremities

Skeletal plasma clearance is defined as the volume of plasma cleared of tracer (99m Tc-MDP) by the skeleton per unit time (milliliter/minute). Kbone is the rate constant representing plasma clearance of tracer to bone. The Patlak plot method was used to evaluate whole skeleton 99mTc-MDP skeletal plasma clearance (Kbone) and to derive regional values for the skull, mandible, spine, pelvis, and upper and lower extremities. (NCT00259298)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months, 18 months, 24 months

Interventionpercentage of change of plasma clearance (Median)
Whole skeleton, baseline to 3 months, n=10Whole skeleton, baseline to 24 months, n=9Whole skeleton, 3 months to 18 months, n=10Whole skeleton, 18 months to 24 months, n=9Skull, baseline to 3 months, n=8Skull, baseline to 18 months, n=8Skull, baseline to 24 months, n=7Skull, 3 months to 18 months, n=8Skull, 18 months to 24 months, n=7Mandible, baseline to 3 months, n=8Mandible, baseline to 18 months, n=8Mandible, baseline to 24 months, n=7Mandible, 3 months to 18 months, n=8Mandible, 18 months to 24 months, n=7Spine, baseline to 3 months, n=10Spine, baseline to 18 months, n=10Spine, baseline to 24 months, n=9Spine, 3 months to 18 months, n=10Spine, 18 months to 24 months, n=9Pelvis, baseline to 3 months, n=10Pelvis, baseline to 18 months, n=10Pelvis, baseline to 24 months, n=9Pelvis, 3 months to 18 months, n=10Pelvis, 18 months to 24 months, n=9Upper extremities, baseline to 3 months, n=10Upper extremities, baseline to 18 months, n=10Upper extremities, baseline to 24 months, n=9Upper extremities, 3 months to 18 months, n=10Upper extremities, 18 months to 24 months, n=9Lower extremities, baseline to 3 months, n=10Lower extremities, baseline to 18 months, n=10Lower extremities, baseline to 24 months, n=9Lower extremities, 3 months to 18 months, n=10Lower extremities, 18 months to 24 months, n=9
Teriparatide25.023.5210.44-22.2072.25128.4421.2031.01-37.8765.9460.9921.054.55-17.3917.3133.8116.9414.10-9.4220.268.36-5.58-3.29-13.8142.5295.4962.7645.84-19.3520.9834.887.0712.72-20.72

[back to top]

Change in Skeletal Uptake of 99m Technetium Methylene Diphosphonate (99m Tc-MDP) in the Whole Skeleton, Skull, Mandible, Spine, Pelvis, Upper Extremities, and Lower Extremities

Skeletal uptake describes the percent uptake of radionuclide tracer by the skeleton when compared to baseline or other post-baseline measures. Skeletal uptake is defined as percentage of uptake of 99mTc-MDP 4 hours after injection. This value differs from skeletal plasma clearance measurements because it only quantifies the amount of 99mTc-MDP taken up by bone without consideration of concentration of tracer in the plasma. (NCT00259298)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months, 18 months, 24 months

Interventionpercentage of change of skeletal uptake (Median)
whole skeleton, baseline to 3 months, n=10whole skeleton, baseline to 18 months, n=10whole skeleton, baseline to 24 months, n=9whole skeleton, 3 months to 18 months, n=10whole skeleton, 18 months to 24 months, n=9skull, baseline to 3 months, n=8skull, baseline to 18 months, n=8skull, baseline to 24 months, n=7skull, 3 months to 18 months, n=8skull, 18 months to 24 months, n=7mandible, baseline to 3 months, n=8mandible, baseline to 18 months, n=8mandible, baseline to 24 months, n=7mandible, 3 months to 18 months, n=8mandible, 18 to 24 months, n=7spine, baseline to 3 months, n=10spine, baseline to 18 months, n=10spine, baseline to 24 months, n=9spine, 3 months to 18 months, n=10spine, 18 months to 24 months, n=9pelvis, baseline to 3 months, n=10pelvis, baseline to 18 months, n=10pelvis, baseline to 24 months, n=9pelvis, 3 months to 18 months, n=10pelvis, 18 months to 24 months, n=9upper extremities, baseline to 3 months, n=10upper extremities, baseline to 18 months, n=10upper extremities, baseline to 24 months, n=9upper extremities, 3 months to 18 months, n=10upper extremities, 18 months to 24 months, n=9lower extremities, baseline to 3 months, n=10lower extremities, baseline to 18 months, n=10lower extremities, baseline to 24 months, n=9lower extremities, 3 months to 18 months, n=10lower extremities, 18 months to 24 months, n=9
Teriparatide15.6326.125.683.99-14.5468.27120.8526.8723.63-34.3652.2062.9123.083.85-6.2512.1517.7717.6813.36-0.1914.26-1.21-1.48-3.70-5.2331.5976.5857.8248.58-10.139.2523.980.867.58-16.99

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Changes in Diffuse Uptake of 99m Tc-MDP - Qualitative Visual Assessment in the Whole Skeleton

Changes in diffuse uptake were determined by comparing diffuse uptake to baseline or other post-baseline observations. Diffuse uptake indicates response to therapy (during active treatment, increased diffuse uptake was expected; after the 6-month withdrawal period, decreased diffuse uptake was expected). Qualitative visual scoring of changes in the bone scan images were performed jointly by 3 reviewers who classified changes in the whole skeleton into 4 groups as follows: possible decreased response, no response, possible response, and definite response. (NCT00259298)
Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 18 months, 24 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
3 months, no response3 months, possible response3 months, definite response18 months, no response18 months, possible response18 months, definite response24 months, possible response24 months, no response24 months, definite response
Teriparatide2261181611

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Time to First Occurrence of at Least a 30% Reduction in 24-Hour Average Back Pain up to 18 Months

Time to first occurrence of >=30% pain reduction in average back pain from baseline to 18 months. Average back pain is assessed using an 11-point numeric rating scale, an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), to rate the average back pain experienced in the preceding 24 hours and is evaluated daily in the week prior to each scheduled study visit. The results are reported as the number of participants reporting at least a 30% reduction in the severity of average back pain up to time (t) in days. (NCT00343252)
Timeframe: Baseline through 18 Months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Teriparatide260
Risedronate242

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Time to First Occurrence of at Least 30% Reduction in 24-Hour Worst Back Pain up to 12 Months

Time to first occurrence of >= 30% pain reduction in worst back pain from baseline to 12 months. Worst back pain is assessed using an 11-point numeric rating scale, an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), to rate the worst back pain experienced in the preceding 24 hours and is evaluated daily in the week prior to each scheduled study visit. The results are reported as the number of participants reporting at least a 30% reduction in the severity of worst back pain up to time (t) in days. (NCT00343252)
Timeframe: Days 0, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300, 360, 420, 480, 540, and 600

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Day 0Day 60Day 120Day 180Day 240Day 300Day 360Day 420Day 480Day 540Day 600
Risedronate074145181193206209220220220220
Teriparatide070151195206224226233233233233

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Time to First Occurrence of at Least 30% Reduction in 24-Hour Worst Back Pain up to 18 Months

Time to first occurrence of >= 30% pain reduction in worst back pain from baseline to 18 months. Worst back pain is assessed using an 11-point numeric rating scale, an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), to rate the worst back pain experienced in the preceding 24 hours and is evaluated daily in the week prior to each scheduled study visit. The results are reported as the number of participants reporting at least a 30% reduction in the severity of worst back pain up to time (t) in days. (NCT00343252)
Timeframe: Baseline through 18 Months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Teriparatide248
Risedronate234

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 6-Month Endpoint, European Foundation for Osteoporosis Quality of Life Instrument (QUALEFFO)

QUALEFFO is an osteoporosis-specific health instrument developed specifically for participants with vertebral deformities used to evaluate the effect of back pain and treatment on quality of life. The QUALEFFO questionnaire includes 41 items in 5 domains: pain, physical function, social function, general health perception, and mental function. The total score is calculated according to the scoring algorithm developed by the International Osteoporosis Foundation. Total scores are reported from 0 to 100, with lower scores corresponding to better quality of life. (NCT00343252)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 Months

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide-2.80
Risedronate-2.63

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12-Month Endpoint in the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ-24) is completed by the participant and measures the degree of disability due to back pain. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician and a total score is given. The total score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 24 (severe disability). (NCT00343252)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Months

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide-2.09
Risedronate-2.12

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 6-Month Endpoint in the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ-24) is completed by the participant and measures the degree of disability due to back pain. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician and a total score is given. The total score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 24 (severe disability). (NCT00343252)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 Months

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide-1.58
Risedronate-1.77

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 3-Month Endpoint in the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ-24) is completed by the participant and measures the degree of disability due to back pain. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician and a total score is given. The total score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 24 (severe disability). (NCT00343252)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 Months

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide-1.42
Risedronate-1.41

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 18-Month Endpoint in the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ-24) is completed by the participant and measures the degree of disability due to back pain. The questionnaire consists of 24 statements and the participant is instructed to put a mark next to each appropriate statement. The number of statements marked are added up by the clinician and a total score is given. The total score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 24 (severe disability). Pooled site, baseline glucocorticoid usage status (yes/no) and baseline score were controlled for. (NCT00343252)
Timeframe: Baseline, 18 Months

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide-3.21
Risedronate-3.19

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 18-Month Endpoint in European Foundation for Osteoporosis Quality of Life Instrument (QUALEFFO)

QUALEFFO is an osteoporosis-specific health instrument developed specifically for participants with vertebral deformities used to evaluate the effect of back pain and treatment on quality of life. The QUALEFFO questionnaire includes 41 items in 5 domains: pain, physical function, social function, general health perception, and mental function. The total score is calculated according to the scoring algorithm developed by the International Osteoporosis Foundation. Total scores are reported from 0 to 100, with lower scores corresponding to better quality of life. (NCT00343252)
Timeframe: Baseline, 18 Months

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide-5.67
Risedronate-5.17

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 12-Month Endpoint, European Foundation for Osteoporosis Quality of Life Instrument (QUALEFFO)

QUALEFFO is an osteoporosis-specific health instrument developed specifically for participants with vertebral deformities used to evaluate the effect of back pain and treatment on quality of life. The QUALEFFO questionnaire includes 41 items in 5 domains: pain, physical function, social function, general health perception, and mental function. The total score is calculated according to the scoring algorithm developed by the International Osteoporosis Foundation. Total scores are reported from 0 to 100, with lower scores corresponding to better quality of life. (NCT00343252)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Months

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide-5.74
Risedronate-5.27

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Time to First Occurrence of at Least a 30% Reduction in 24-Hour Average Back Pain up to 6 Months

Time to first occurrence of >=30% pain reduction in average back pain from baseline to 6 months. Average back pain is assessed using an 11-point numeric rating scale, an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), to rate the average back pain experienced in the preceding 24 hours and is evaluated daily in the week prior to each scheduled study visit. The results are reported as the number of participants reporting at least a 30% reduction in the severity of average back pain up to time (t) in days. (NCT00343252)
Timeframe: Days 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, 270, and 300

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Day 0Day 30Day 60Day 90Day 120Day 150Day 180Day 210Day 240Day 270Day 300
Risedronate03386130162178200210211211211
Teriparatide04091136175199212221221221221

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Time to First Occurrence of at Least a 30% Reduction in 24-Hour Average Back Pain up to 12 Months

Time to first occurrence of >= 30% pain reduction in average back pain from baseline to 12 months. Average back pain is assessed using an 11-point numeric rating scale, an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), to rate the average back pain experienced in the preceding 24 hours and is evaluated daily in the week prior to each scheduled study visit. The results are reported as the number of participants reporting at least a 30% reduction in the severity of average back pain up to time (t) in days. (NCT00343252)
Timeframe: Days 0, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300, 360, 420, 480, 540, and 600

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Day 0Day 60Day 120Day 180Day 240Day 300Day 360Day 420Day 480Day 540Day 600
Risedronate086162200211220226238238238238
Teriparatide091175212221234238246246246246

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Time to First Occurrence of at Least 30% Reduction in 24-Hour Worst Back Pain up to 6 Months

Time to first occurrence of >= 30% pain reduction in worst back pain from baseline to 6 months. Worst back pain is assessed using an 11-point numeric rating scale, an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), to rate the worst back pain experienced in the preceding 24 hours and is evaluated daily in the week prior to each scheduled study visit. The results are reported as the number of participants reporting at least a 30% reduction in the severity of worst back pain up to time (t) in days. (NCT00343252)
Timeframe: Days 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, 270, and 300

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Day 0Day 30Day 60Day 90Day 120Day 150Day 180Day 210Day 240Day 270Day 300
Risedronate02274111145164181192193193193
Teriparatide02670110151175195206206206206

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Safety) During 18 Months

Safety is assessed via serious adverse events and all other non-serious adverse events and the data are located in the Reported Adverse Events Section. (NCT00343252)
Timeframe: Baseline through 18 Months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Serious Adverse EventsAdverse Events
Risedronate66273
Teriparatide55277

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Safety) During 12 Months

Safety was assessed via serious adverse events and all other non-serious adverse events and the data are located in the Reported Adverse Events Section. (NCT00343252)
Timeframe: Baseline through 12 Months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Serious Adverse EventsAdverse Events
Risedronate50266
Teriparatide39269

[back to top]

Number of Participants Responding With at Least a 30% Reduction in 24-Hour Worst Back Pain Severity at the 6-Month Endpoint

24-hour worst back pain severity scores recorded daily on an 11-point numeric rating scale, an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). The 11-point scale is used for assessment of worst back pain in the preceding 24 hours and is evaluated daily in the week prior to each scheduled study visit. Responders are defined as participants with at least a 30% reduction in the severity of worst back pain from baseline to the 6-month last observation carried forward (LOCF) endpoint. (NCT00343252)
Timeframe: 6 Months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Responder to TreatmentNon-Responder to Treatment
Risedronate193143
Teriparatide206142

[back to top]

Number of Participants Responding With at Least a 30% Reduction in 24-Hour Worst Back Pain Severity at the 18-Month Endpoint

24-hour worst back pain severity scores recorded daily on an 11-point numeric rating scale, an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). The 11-point scale is used for assessment of worst back pain in the preceding 24 hours and is evaluated daily in the week prior to each scheduled study visit. Responders are defined as participants with at least a 30% reduction in the severity of worst back pain from baseline to the 18-month last observation carried forward (LOCF) endpoint. (NCT00343252)
Timeframe: 18 Months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
ResponderNon-Responder
Risedronate234115
Teriparatide248112

[back to top]

Number of Participants Responding With at Least a 30% Reduction in 24-Hour Worst Back Pain Severity at the 12-Month Endpoint

24-hour worst back pain severity scores recorded daily on an 11-point numeric rating scale, an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). The 11-point scale is used for assessment of worst back pain in the preceding 24 hours and is evaluated daily in the week prior to each scheduled study visit. Responders are defined as participants with at least a 30% reduction in the severity of worst back pain from baseline to the 12-month last observation carried forward (LOCF) endpoint. (NCT00343252)
Timeframe: 12 Months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Responder to TreatmentNon-Responder to Treatment
Risedronate220116
Teriparatide233115

[back to top]

Number of Participants Responding With at Least a 30% Reduction in 24-Hour Average Back Pain Severity at the 6-Month Endpoint

24-hour average back pain severity scores recorded daily on an 11-point numeric rating scale, an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). The 11-point scale is used for assessment of average back pain in the preceding 24 hours and is evaluated daily in the week prior to each scheduled study visit. Responders are defined as participants with at least a 30% reduction in the severity of average back pain from baseline to the 6-month last observation carried forward (LOCF) endpoint. (NCT00343252)
Timeframe: 6 Months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Responder to TreatmentNon-Responder to Treatment
Risedronate211125
Teriparatide221126

[back to top]

Number of Participants Responding With at Least a 30% Reduction in 24-Hour Average Back Pain Severity at the 18-Month Endpoint

24-hour average back pain severity scores recorded daily on an 11-point numeric rating scale, an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). The 11-point scale is used for assessment of average back pain in the preceding 24 hours and is evaluated daily in the week prior to each scheduled study visit. Responders are defined as participants with at least a 30% reduction in the severity of average back pain from baseline to the 18-month last observation carried forward (LOCF) endpoint. (NCT00343252)
Timeframe: 18 Months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
ResponderNon-responder
Risedronate242107
Teriparatide260100

[back to top]

Number of Participants Responding With at Least a 30% Reduction in 24-Hour Average Back Pain Severity at the 12-Month Endpoint

24-hour average back pain severity scores recorded daily on an 11-point numeric rating scale, an ordinal scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). The 11-point scale is used for assessment of average back pain in the preceding 24 hours and is evaluated daily in the week prior to each scheduled study visit. Responders are defined as participants with at least a 30% reduction in the severity of average back pain from baseline to the 12-month last observation carried forward (LOCF) endpoint. (NCT00343252)
Timeframe: 12 Months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Responder to TreatmentNon-Responder to Treatment
Risedronate23898
Teriparatide246101

[back to top]

Median Time to Neutrophil Engraftment (Defined as an Absolute Neutrophil Count [ANC] Greater Than 500)

Median time to neutrophil engraftment (defined as an absolute neutrophil count [ANC] greater than 500) (NCT00393380)
Timeframe: Statistic is calculated at Day 42 but ANC counts are measured daily up through discharge.

Interventiondays (Median)
Parathyroid Hormone (Teriparatide)30

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival

Disease-free survival (NCT00393380)
Timeframe: Measured at 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Parathyroid Hormone (Teriparatide)38.5

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of Relapse

Cumulative Incidence of Relapse (NCT00393380)
Timeframe: Measured at 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Parathyroid Hormone (Teriparatide)15.4

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of Acute GVHD Grades II-IV at Day 100

Cumulative Incidence of Acute GVHD Grades II-IV at day 100 (NCT00393380)
Timeframe: Measured at Day 100

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Parathyroid Hormone (Teriparatide)38.5

[back to top] [back to top]

Platelet Engraftment (Greater Than 20,000)

Platelet engraftment (greater than 20,000) (NCT00393380)
Timeframe: Measured at Day 180

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Parathyroid Hormone (Teriparatide)46.2

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD

Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD (NCT00393380)
Timeframe: Measured at 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Parathyroid Hormone (Teriparatide)38.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall Survival (NCT00393380)
Timeframe: Measured at 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Parathyroid Hormone (Teriparatide)38.5

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline to 24 Week Endpoint in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Men

Lumbar spine bone mineral density (milligrams per square centimeter) was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Change = Endpoint minus baseline. (NCT00414973)
Timeframe: Baseline to 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage change in lumbar spine BMD (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide - Males6.01
Calcitonin - Males3.38

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline to 24 Week Endpoint in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Postmenopausal Women

Lumbar spine bone mineral density (milligrams per square centimeter) was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Change = Endpoint minus baseline. (NCT00414973)
Timeframe: Baseline to 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage change in lumbar spine BMD (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide - Females6.04
Calcitonin - Females1.65

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline to 24 Week Endpoint in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Men

Total hip bone mineral density (milligrams per square centimeter) was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Change = Endpoint minus baseline. (NCT00414973)
Timeframe: Baseline to 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage change in total hip BMD (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide - Males0.37
Calcitonin - Males1.34

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline to 24 Week Endpoint in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD), Postmenopausal Women

Total hip bone mineral density (milligrams per square centimeter) was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Change = Endpoint minus baseline. (NCT00414973)
Timeframe: Baseline to 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage change in total hip BMD (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide - Females-0.53
Calcitonin - Females-0.62

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks in Osteocalcin, Men

Measures of serum osteocalcin (nanograms per milliliter). Change = Endpoint minus baseline. (NCT00414973)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks and 24 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage change in osteocalcin (Median)
Week 12 Percentage Change (n=21, n=11)Week 24 Percentage Change (n=21, n=11)
Calcitonin - Males4.35-17.65
Teriparatide - Males107.2779.26

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks in Osteocalcin, Postmenopausal Women

Measures of serum osteocalcin (nanograms per milliliter). Change = Endpoint minus baseline. (NCT00414973)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks and 24 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage change in osteocalcin (Median)
Week 12 Percentage Change (n=202, n=102)Week 24 Percentage Change (n=191, n=97)
Calcitonin - Females-7.67-10.58
Teriparatide - Females113.87137.45

[back to top]

Percent Change in Biochemical Markers of Bone Metabolism - Serum Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BAP) During Open Label Phases at 76 Weeks and 104 Weeks

Percent change in serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) from baseline to the individual visits and last measurement point. (NCT00433160)
Timeframe: Baseline, 76 Weeks, 104 Weeks

,
Interventionpercent change in BAP (Mean)
Percent Change to Week 76; n=113, n=55Percent Change to Week 104; n=92, n=47
Placebo15.7116.45
Teriparatide17.49-1.52

[back to top]

Vertebral Fractures by Central X-ray Assessment

Number of vertebral fractures observed from Visit 1 (study entry) through Visit 19 (Week 52). All new or worsened vertebral fractures were defined as a deterioration of at least one grade in a semiquantitative score by X-ray assessment. Number of subjects with fractures and number of fractured vertebra(e) were counted. (NCT00433160)
Timeframe: Baseline through 52 weeks

,
Interventionnumber of fractures (Number)
New Fractures (n=5, n=4)Worsening Fractures (n=2, n=0)
Placebo50
Teriparatide73

[back to top]

Percent Change in Biochemical Markers of Bone Metabolism - Serum Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BAP)

Percent change in serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) from baseline to the individual visits and last measurement point. (NCT00433160)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 4, 12, 24, 52

,
Interventionpercent change in BAP (Mean)
Percent Change to Week 4 (n=135, n=66)Percent Change to Week 12 (n=131, n=62)Percent Change to Week 24 (n=127, n=60)Percent Change to Week 52 (n=120, n=59)Percent Change to Last Measurement (n=136, n=66)
Placebo-9.63-16.97-28.46-32.24-28.34
Teriparatide3.743.23-4.60-17.69-17.32

[back to top]

Fractures by Investigators Assessment

"Vertebral and nonvertebral fractures assessed by the investigator or subinvestigator after starting the study treatment. Traumatic fractures were those caused by falling from above standing height or a high velocity (car) accident. Fractures were assessed to be fragility if they occurred without trauma." (NCT00433160)
Timeframe: Baseline through 52 Weeks

,
Interventionnumber of fractures (Number)
Vertebral Fracture - FragilityVertebral Fracture - TraumaticNon-Vertebra Fracture - FragilityNon-Vertebra Fracture - Traumatic
Placebo1013
Teriparatide0012

[back to top]

Back Pain Severity During Open Label Phases at 76 Weeks and 104 Weeks

Severity of back pain at 76 weeks and 104 weeks. Back pain was measured on a scale of 1 (none) to 4 (severe). (NCT00433160)
Timeframe: Baseline, 76 Weeks, 104 Weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Week 76: 1- NoneWeek 76: 2- MildWeek 76: 3- ModerateWeek 76: 4- SevereWeek 104: 1- NoneWeek 104: 2- MildWeek 104: 3- ModerateWeek 104: 4- Severe
Placebo381340321320
Teriparatide783140662330

[back to top]

Back Pain Severity

Severity of back pain at baseline, individual visits and the last measurement point. Back pain was measured on a scale of 1 (none) to 4 (severe). (NCT00433160)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 52

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline: 1 - NoneBaseline: 2 - MildBaseline: 3 - ModerateBaseline: 4 - SevereWeek 12: 1 - NoneWeek 12: 2 - MildWeek 12: 3 - ModerateWeek 12: 4 - SevereWeek 24: 1 - NoneWeek 24: 2 - MildWeek 24: 3 - ModerateWeek 24: 4 - SevereWeek 36: 1 - NoneWeek 36: 2 - MildWeek 36: 3 - ModerateWeek 36: 4 - SevereWeek 52: 1 - NoneWeek 52: 2 - MildWeek 52: 3 - ModerateWeek 52: 4 - SevereLast Measurement: 1 - NoneLast Measurement: 2 - MildLast Measurement: 3 - ModerateLast Measurement: 4 - Severe
Placebo362641411850421540421540421251441451
Teriparatide7747120794480873460823650843250903650

[back to top]

Vertebral Fractures by Central X-ray Assessment During Entire Study Period of 104 Weeks

Number of vertebral fractures observed from Visit 1 (study entry) through 104 weeks. All new or worsened vertebral fractures were defined as a deterioration of at least one grade in a semiquantitative score by X-ray assessment. Number of subjects with fractures and number of fractured vertebra(e) were counted. (NCT00433160)
Timeframe: Baseline through 104 Weeks

,
Interventionnumber of fractures (Number)
New Fractures at 104 Weeks (n=5, n=6)Worsening Fractures at 104 Weeks (n=2, n=2)
Placebo73
Teriparatide73

[back to top]

Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density at Lumbar Spine (L2-L4) During Open Label Phases at 76 Weeks and 104 Weeks

Percent change in bone mineral density (BMD) at lumbar spine (L2-L4) from baseline to the last measurement point. (NCT00433160)
Timeframe: Baseline, 76 Weeks, 104 Weeks

,
Interventionpercent change in BMD (Mean)
Percent Change to Week 76; n=113, n=55Percent Change to Week 104; n=92, n=47
Placebo6.399.11
Teriparatide11.9313.42

[back to top]

Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density at Lumbar Spine (L2-L4)

Percent change in bone mineral density (BMD) at lumbar spine (L2-L4) from baseline to the last measurement point. (NCT00433160)
Timeframe: Baseline to 52 weeks

,
Interventionpercent change in BMD (Mean)
Percent Change to Last Measurement Point
Placebo0.04
Teriparatide9.82

[back to top]

Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Total Hip During Open Label Phases at 76 Weeks and 104 Weeks

Percent change in bone mineral density (BMD) at total hip from baseline to the last measurement point. (NCT00433160)
Timeframe: Baseline, 76 Weeks, 104 Weeks

,
Interventionpercent change in BMD (Mean)
Percent Change to Week 76; n=112, n=54Percent Change to Week 104; n=91, n=46
Placebo1.642.46
Teriparatide3.023.67

[back to top]

Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Total Hip

Percent change in bone mineral density (BMD) at total hip from baseline to the last measurement point. (NCT00433160)
Timeframe: Baseline to 52 Weeks

,
Interventionpercent change in BMD (Mean)
Percent Change to Last Measurement Point
Placebo-0.22
Teriparatide2.66

[back to top]

Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Lumbar Spine (L1-L4) During Open Label Phases at 76 Weeks and 104 Weeks

Percent change in bone mineral density at lumbar spine (L1-L4) from baseline to the last measurement point. (NCT00433160)
Timeframe: Baseline, 76 Weeks, 104 Weeks

,
Interventionpercent change in BMD (Mean)
Percent Change to Week 76; n=113, n=55Percent Change to Week 104; n=92, n=47
Placebo6.639.46
Teriparatide12.2414.01

[back to top]

Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Lumbar Spine (L1-L4)

Percent change in bone mineral density at lumbar spine (L1-L4) from baseline to the last measurement point. (NCT00433160)
Timeframe: Baseline to 52 Weeks

,
Interventionpercent change in BMD (Mean)
Percent Change to Last Measurement Point
Placebo0.11
Teriparatide10.23

[back to top]

Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Femoral Neck During Open Label Phases at 76 Weeks and 104 Weeks

Percent change in bone mineral density at femoral neck from baseline to the last measurement point. (NCT00433160)
Timeframe: Baseline, 76 Weeks, 104 Weeks

,
Interventionpercent change in BMD (Mean)
Percent Change to Week 76; n=112, n=54Percent Change to Week 104; n=91, n=46
Placebo1.172.19
Teriparatide2.683.26

[back to top]

Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Femoral Neck

Percent change in bone mineral density at femoral neck from baseline to the last measurement point. (NCT00433160)
Timeframe: Baseline to 52 Weeks

,
Interventionpercent change in BMD (Mean)
Percent Change to Last Measurement Point
Placebo0.46
Teriparatide2.24

[back to top]

Percent Change in Biochemical Markers of Bone Metabolism - Serum Type I Collagen Crosslinked C-telopeptide (CTX) During Open Label Phases at 76 Weeks and 104 Weeks

Percent change in serum type I collagen crosslinked C-telepeptide (CTX) from baseline to the individual visits and last measurement point. (NCT00433160)
Timeframe: Baseline, 76 Weeks, 104 Weeks

,
Interventionpercent change in CTX (Mean)
Percent Change to Week 76; n=104, n=53Percent Change to Week 104; n=85, n=45
Placebo86.9872.84
Teriparatide85.8554.39

[back to top]

Percent Change in Biochemical Markers of Bone Metabolism - Serum Type I Collagen Crosslinked C-telopeptide (CTX)

Percent change in serum type I collagen crosslinked C-telopeptide (CTX) from baseline to the individual visits and last measurement point. (NCT00433160)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 4, 12, 24, 52

,
Interventionpercent change in CTX (Mean)
Percent Change to Week 4 (n=124, n=63)Percent Change to Week 12 (n=121, n=61)Percent Change to Week 24 (n=119, n=59)Percent Change to Week 52 (n=113, n=58)Percent Change to Last Measurement (n=126, n=65)
Placebo-2.05-3.564.3913.5011.64
Teriparatide2.7846.5282.2784.8179.41

[back to top]

Percent Change in Biochemical Markers of Bone Metabolism - Serum Procollagen I N-terminal Propeptide (PINP) During Open Label Phases at 76 Weeks and 104 Weeks

Percent change in serum procollagen I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) from baseline to the individual visits and last measurement point. (NCT00433160)
Timeframe: Baseline, 76 Weeks, 104 Weeks

,
Interventionpercent change in PINP (Mean)
Percent change to Week 76; n=113, n=55Percent change to Week 104; n=92, n=47
Placebo97.28134.89
Teriparatide115.4574.71

[back to top]

Percent Change in Biochemical Markers of Bone Metabolism - Serum Procollagen I N-terminal Propeptide (PINP)

Percent change in serum procollagen I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) from baseline to the individual visits and last measurement point. (NCT00433160)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 4, 12, 24, and 52

,
Interventionpercent change in PINP (Mean)
Percent Change to Week 4 (n=136, n=66)Percent Change to Week 12 (n=131, n=64)Percent Change to Week 24 (n=127, n=61)Percent Change to Week 52 (n=121, n=60)Percent Change to Last Measurement (n=136,n=66)
Placebo-9.58-16.89-19.10-14.18-13.82
Teriparatide90.6789.58114.12116.11111.74

[back to top]

Fractures by Investigators Assessment During Entire Study Period of 104 Weeks

"Vertebral and nonvertebral fractures assessed by the investigator or subinvestigator after starting the study treatment. Traumatic fractures were those caused by falling from above standing height or a high velocity (car) accident. Fractures were assessed to be fragility if they occurred without trauma." (NCT00433160)
Timeframe: Baseline Through 104 Weeks

,
Interventionnumber of fractures (Number)
Vertebral Fracture - Fragility - 104 WeeksVertebral Fracture - Traumatic - 104 WeeksNon-Vertebra Fracture - Fragility - 104 WeeksNon-Vertebra Fracture - Traumatic - 104 Weeks
Placebo1014
Teriparatide0013

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 52

BMD measurements of the lumbar spine (L1-L4) by Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were performed on all patients at screening, and Weeks 13, 26, and 52 (or early termination). Every attempt was made to obtain the BMD measurements at the scheduled visit. If this was not possible, a BMD measurement ± 7 days from the scheduled visit was obtained. For the Final DXA at Week 52, the window was 10 - 15 days prior to the final study visit. BMD scans were acquired locally and all results sent to a central reader for evaluation. (NCT00439244)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 52

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Zoledronic Acid Plus Teriparatide7.51
Zoledronic Acid4.37
Placebo Zoledronic Acid Plus Teriparatide7.05

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 13, Week 26 and Week 52

BMD measurements of the total hip by Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were performed on all patients at screening, and Weeks 13, 26, and 52 (or early termination). Every attempt was made to obtain the BMD measurements at the scheduled visit. If this was not possible, a BMD measurement ± 7 days from the scheduled visit was obtained. For the final DXA at Week 52, the window was 10 - 15 days prior to the final study visit. BMD scans were acquired locally and all results sent to a central reader for evaluation. (NCT00439244)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 13, Week 26 and Week 52

,,
InterventionPercent Change (Least Squares Mean)
At Week 13 (n= 127, 133, 133)At Week 26 (n= 128, 130, 133)At Week 52 (n= 123, 129, 129)
Placebo Zoledronic Acid Plus Teriparatide0.750.891.10
Zoledronic Acid1.531.732.16
Zoledronic Acid Plus Teriparatide2.542.312.33

[back to top]

Bone Resorption and Formation Biochemical Markers : Beta C-terminal Telopeptides of Type I Collagen (β-CTx)

Specialized tests for markers of bone formation such as β-CTx were performed at Baseline, and Weeks 4, 8, 26, 39, and 52. The amount of serum β-CTx was determined by the central laboratory. (NCT00439244)
Timeframe: At Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 26, Week 39 and Week 52

,,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
At Baseline (n= 126, 129, 121)At Week 4 (n= 109, 110, 104)At Week 8 (n= 106, 107, 98)At Week 26 (n= 116, 119, 114)At Week 39 (n= 110, 115, 110)At Week 52 (n= 110, 113, 112)
Placebo Zoledronic Acid Plus Teriparatide0.460.450.600.900.890.83
Zoledronic Acid0.440.050.070.120.150.17
Zoledronic Acid Plus Teriparatide0.450.050.090.430.570.64

[back to top]

Bone Resorption and Formation Biochemical Markers : N-terminal Propeptide of Type I Collagen (P1NP)

Specialized tests for markers of bone formation such as n-terminal propeptide of type I collagen (P1NP) were performed at Baseline, and Weeks 4, 8, 26, 39, and 52. The amount of serum P1NP was determined by the central laboratory. (NCT00439244)
Timeframe: At Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 26, Week 39 and Week 52

,,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
At Baseline (n= 126, 129, 121)At Week 4 (n= 109, 110, 104)At Week 8 (n= 106, 107, 98)At Week 26 (n= 116, 119, 114)At Week 39 (n= 110, 115, 110)At Week 52 (n= 110, 113, 112)
Placebo Zoledronic Acid Plus Teriparatide55.6993.6399.27156.97153.92137.53
Zoledronic Acid53.6439.5721.6818.3220.6923.49
Zoledronic Acid Plus Teriparatide52.7261.7439.9165.2697.00112.87

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Week 13 and Week 26

BMD measurements of the lumbar spine (L1-L4) by Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were performed on all patients at screening, and Weeks 13, 26, and 52 (or early termination). Every attempt was made to obtain the BMD measurements at the scheduled visit. If this was not possible, a BMD measurement ± 7 days from the scheduled visit was obtained. For the Final DXA at Week 52, the window was 10 - 15 days prior to the final study visit. BMD scans were acquired locally and all results sent to a central reader for evaluation. (NCT00439244)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 13 and Week 26

,,
InterventionPercent Change (Least Squares Mean)
At Week 13 (n= 127, 131, 131)At Week 26 (n= 128, 130, 132)
Placebo Zoledronic Acid Plus Teriparatide2.884.45
Zoledronic Acid2.973.87
Zoledronic Acid Plus Teriparatide4.656.31

[back to top]

Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover: Levels of C-terminal Telopeptide α1 Chain of Type 1 Collagen (CTX1)

Blood samples were collected at Baseline (Day 0), Week 4, Month 3, 6, and 12 for measurement of CTX1. (NCT00471237)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Week 4, Month 3, 6, and 12

Interventionnanogram per litre (ng/L) (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineWeek 4Month 3Month 6Month 12
Placebo625.2530.7523.5517.6525.1

[back to top]

Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover: Levels of C-terminal Telopeptide α1 Chain of Type 1 Collagen (CTX1)

Blood samples were collected at Baseline (Day 0), Week 4, Month 3, 6, and 12 for measurement of CTX1. (NCT00471237)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Week 4, Month 3, 6, and 12

,,,,,
Interventionnanogram per litre (ng/L) (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineBaseline, Placebo contrastWeek 4Week 4, Placebo contrastMonth 3Month 3, Placebo contrastMonth 6Month 6, Placebo contrastMonth 12Month 12, Placebo contrast
Alendronate, 70 mg, Capsule, OW630.41.01288.00.54257.10.49235.90.46158.30.30
Ronacaleret, 100 mg Tablet, OD635.31.02515.20.97598.51.14648.21.25695.21.32
Ronacaleret, 200 mg Tablet, OD632.01.01525.40.99688.91.32777.11.50806.11.54
Ronacaleret, 300 mg Tablet, OD587.90.94506.10.95723.21.38859.61.66852.81.62
Ronacaleret, 400 mg Tablet, OD645.51.03529.21.00818.91.56964.31.86991.91.89
Teriparatide, 20 mcg, SC Injection, OD564.00.90576.11.09864.11.6511122.1510712.04

[back to top]

Number of Participant With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings Reported as Adverse Event

Full 12-lead ECGs pre-dose at screening and visits 6, 8, 11, 12 and 14 were recorded. Participants rested supine or seated for at least 10 minutes before each reading. All ECGs were transmitted to a central reviewer for blinded assessment. The central reviewer measured the following parameters and provide a clinical interpretation: heart rate, RR interval, PR interval, QRS interval, QT (uncorrected) interval, QTcB (Bazett's correction) interval, QTcF (Fridericia's correction) interval. The central reviewer was provided the investigator or designated qualified site physician with a central ECG report or confirmatory report to assist them in identifying any clinically significant abnormalities that would preclude the participant from further participation in the study. (NCT00471237)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo1
Ronacaleret, 100 mg Tablet, OD5
Ronacaleret, 200 mg Tablet, OD4
Ronacaleret, 300 mg Tablet, OD3
Ronacaleret, 400 mg Tablet, OD3
Alendronate, 70 mg, Capsule, OW5
Teriparatide, 20 mcg, SC Injection, OD0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hypercalcemia

Participants with albumin-adjusted serum calcium pre-dose values of >11.0 mg/ deciliter (dL) or post-dose values of >12.0 mg/dL were recorded as participants with hypercalcemia. Number of participant with hypercalcemia were reported. (NCT00471237)
Timeframe: Up to Month 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo0
Ronacaleret, 100 mg Tablet, OD1
Ronacaleret, 200 mg Tablet, OD1
Ronacaleret, 300 mg Tablet, OD4
Ronacaleret, 400 mg Tablet, OD11
Alendronate, 70 mg, Capsule, OW0
Teriparatide, 20 mcg, SC Injection, OD1

[back to top]

Number of Participants Withdrew Due to Hypercalcemia

A confirmed albumin-adjusted serum calcium pre-dose value of >11.0 mg/dL or post-dose value of >12.0 mg/dL was set as a withdrawal criteria for the study. Number of participants who met this pre-defined stopping criteria were reported. (NCT00471237)
Timeframe: Up to Month 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo0
Ronacaleret, 100 mg Tablet, OD0
Ronacaleret, 200 mg Tablet, OD0
Ronacaleret, 300 mg Tablet, OD0
Ronacaleret, 400 mg Tablet, OD0
Alendronate, 70 mg, Capsule, OW0
Teriparatide, 20 mcg, SC Injection, OD0

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Marrow Density (BMD) at Month 12 Measured by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Scans of the Lumbar Spine (L1-L4)

DXA scanners from Hologic and GE Lunar was used to measure BMD by a DXA scan. At least two vertebrae (L1-L4) that were suitable for measurement of BMD were evaluated. The same scanner was used throughout the study for all measurements for a given participant. DXA scans were sent to a central reading facility for quality control and central analysis. Assessments performed on Day 0 were considered as Baseline. Percent change from Baseline was computed as (change from baseline / baseline value) * 100%. Percent change from Baseline in areal bone mineral density (aBMD) was reported. (NCT00471237)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and 12 Months

InterventionPercent change in BMD (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.03
Ronacaleret, 100 mg Tablet, OD0.32
Ronacaleret, 200 mg Tablet, OD1.39
Ronacaleret, 300 mg Tablet, OD1.61
Ronacaleret, 400 mg Tablet, OD1.62
Alendronate, 70 mg, Capsule, OW4.54

[back to top]

Maximum Blood Concentration (Cmax) of Ronacaleret

Blood samples were collected and analyzed for concentrations of ronacaleret. The individual blood concentration-time data from the intensive pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics subgroup of participants were analyzed by standard noncompartmental methods. Blood samples were collected and analyzed for concentrations of ronacaleret. The individual blood concentration-time data from the intensive PK-PD subgroup of participants were analyzed by standard noncompartmental methods. Following log transformation, Cmax of ronacaleret were separately analyzed by ANOVA using mixed effects model, fitting treatment and country/region as fixed effects. (NCT00471237)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (0.0 h) and 12 h post dose at Week 4, 20, 40 min, 1, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 1-4, 8-12, and 24 h at Month 3, 6 and 12

,,,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cmax. Month 6Cmax. Month 12
Ronacaleret, 100 mg Tablet, OD572.10661.70
Ronacaleret, 200 mg Tablet, OD1050.42999.91
Ronacaleret, 300 mg Tablet, OD1756.452254.26
Ronacaleret, 400 mg Tablet, OD1556.581506.45

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 in the Total Vertebra Integral VOI at the Lumbar Spine as Measured by QCT Scans

QCT is a three-dimensional non-projectional technique to quantify BMD with a number of advantages to other densitometric techniques. Cortical and trabecular bone can be separated, trabecular VOI are largely independent of degenerative changes in the spine and 3 dimensional geometric parameters can be determined. BMD as measured by QCT is a true density measured in g/cm^3 in contrast to DXA Which determines an areal density measured in g/cm^2. Baseline values were assessed on Day 0. Percent change from Baseline was computed as (change from baseline / baseline value) * 100%. (NCT00471237)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and Month 12

InterventionPercent change in VOI (Mean)
Placebo0.04
Ronacaleret, 100 mg Tablet, OD0.85
Ronacaleret, 200 mg Tablet, OD3.01
Ronacaleret, 300 mg Tablet, OD3.58
Ronacaleret, 400 mg Tablet, OD3.54
Alendronate, 70 mg, Capsule, OW5.39
Teriparatide, 20 mcg, SC Injection, OD12.23

[back to top]

Number of Participant With Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern at Any Post-baseline Visit

The potential clinical importance ranges (low and high) of the vital sign parameters-systolic blood pressure (> 30 millimeter of mercury [mmHg] decrease from Baseline, > 30 mmHg increase from Baseline), diastolic blood pressure (> 20 mmHg decrease from Baseline and > 20 mmHg increase from Baseline) and heart rate (<45 and >120 beats per minute). Only those parameters for which at least one value of potential clinical importance was reported are summarized. The number of participants with potential clinical important vital parameter findings at any visit were reported. (NCT00471237)
Timeframe: Up to 12 Months

,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Systolic Blood Pressure, HighSystolic Blood Pressure, LowDiastolic Blood Pressure, HighDiastolic Blood Pressure, LowHeart Rate, Low
Alendronate, 70 mg, Capsule, OW883100
Placebo56282
Ronacaleret, 100 mg Tablet, OD108690
Ronacaleret, 200 mg Tablet, OD810541
Ronacaleret, 300 mg Tablet, OD961121
Ronacaleret, 400 mg Tablet, OD1146101
Teriparatide, 20 mcg, SC Injection, OD13120

[back to top]

Number of Participant With Laboratory Abnormalities of Potential Clinical Concern at Any Post-baseline Visit

The hematology parameters analyzed were white blood cells (WBC) count with differential WBC count, red blood cells, haemoglobin, haematocrit, mean corpuscular volume and platelet count. The clinical chemistry parameters analyzed were sodium, potassium, calcium, calcium (albumin adjusted), phosphate, bicarbonate, creatinine, bilirubin (total), alanine amino transferase, aspartate amino transferase, glucose, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, creatine phosphokinase, urea, uric acid, total protein, 25-OH vitamin D, 1,25-2(OH) vitamin D, whole parathyroid hormone (PTH 1-84)) and intact PTH (1-84 and 7-84). Only those parameters for which at least one value of potential clinical importance was reported are summarized. The number of participants with potential clinical important laboratory findings at any visit were reported. (NCT00471237)
Timeframe: Up to Month 12

,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Monocytes- highTotal neutrophils- highTotal neutrophils- lowEosinophils- highGlucose- highGlucose- lowBasophils- highHematocrit- lowHemoglobin- highHemoglobin- lowPlatelets- highWhite Blood Cell- highWhite Blood Cell- lowCalcium- highPhosphorus- highAlkaline Phosphatase- highTotal bilirubin- high
Alendronate, 70 mg, Capsule, OW28613115010001000010
Placebo179161210322122110100
Ronacaleret, 100 mg Tablet, OD1411586000000010011
Ronacaleret, 200 mg Tablet, OD19108119410101201002
Ronacaleret, 300 mg Tablet, OD17108185002020021131
Ronacaleret, 400 mg Tablet, OD18414194310110101031
Teriparatide, 20 mcg, SC Injection, OD64463001110100100

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Remained the Same or Had Any Improvement in DXA BMD (> Baseline)

Responder rate of participants who remained the same or had any improvement as compared to baseline in DXA BMD of vertebra, femur and vertebra plus femur were reported. Baseline values were assessed on Day 0. Percent change (improvement) from Baseline was computed as (change from baseline / baseline value) * 100%. (NCT00471237)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Month 5, 6 and 12

,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Month 5, Vertebra, BMD % change >=0Month 5, Femur, BMD % change >=0Month 5, Vertebra + Femur, BMD % change >=0Month 6, Vertebra, BMD % change >=0Month 6, Femur, BMD % change >=0Month 6, Vertebra + Femur, BMD % change >=0Month 12, Vertebra, BMD % change >=0Month 12, Femur, BMD % change >=0Month 12, Vertebra + Femur, BMD % change >=0Early Withdrawal, Vertebra, BMD % change >=0Early Withdrawal, Femur, BMD % change >=0Early Withdrawal, Vertebra + Femur, BMD %change>=0
Alendronate, 70 mg, Capsule, OW000111444035000
Placebo000000162010111
Ronacaleret, 100 mg Tablet, OD000000292319111
Ronacaleret, 200 mg Tablet, OD111000321412100
Ronacaleret, 300 mg Tablet, OD000000351917211
Ronacaleret, 400 mg Tablet, OD100000311616111
Teriparatide, 20 mcg, SC Injection, OD000000342524111

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline to Months 6 and 12 in BMD Measured by DXA Scans of the Hip (Total Hip, Femoral Neck and Trochanter).

DXA scanners from Hologic and GE Lunar was used to measure BMD by a DXA scan. At least two vertebrae (L1-L4) that were suitable for measurement of BMD were evaluated. The same scanner was used throughout the study for all measurements for a given participant. DXA scans were sent to a central reading facility for quality control and central analysis. Baseline values were assessed on Day 0. Percent Change from Baseline was computed as (change from baseline / baseline value) * 100%. Percent change from baseline to month 6 and 12 in aBMD of hip (total hip, femoral neck and trochanter) were reported. (NCT00471237)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Month 6 and Month 12

,,,,,
InterventionPercent change in BMD (Least Squares Mean)
Total Hip aBMD, Month 6Total Hip aBMD, Month 12
Alendronate, 70 mg, Capsule, OW1.842.70
Placebo0.420.27
Ronacaleret, 100 mg Tablet, OD-0.26-0.62
Ronacaleret, 200 mg Tablet, OD-0.37-0.75
Ronacaleret, 300 mg Tablet, OD-0.86-1.07
Ronacaleret, 400 mg Tablet, OD-0.88-1.31

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Cortical Thickness at the Hip as Measured by QCT Scans

Percent change in thickness of femur neck cortical VOI thickness and trochanter cortical VOI thickness were at Month 12 measured by QCT were reported. Assessments performed on Day 0 were considered as Baseline. Percent change from Baseline was computed as (change from baseline / baseline value) * 100%. (NCT00471237)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and Month 12

,,,,,,
InterventionPercent change in cortical thickness (Mean)
Neck cortical VOI ThicknessTrochanter cortical VOI Thickness
Alendronate, 70 mg, Capsule, OW-0.130.81
Placebo-0.85-1.00
Ronacaleret, 100 mg Tablet, OD-0.130.76
Ronacaleret, 200 mg Tablet, OD1.121.01
Ronacaleret, 300 mg Tablet, OD-0.88-0.82
Ronacaleret, 400 mg Tablet, OD0.321.60
Teriparatide, 20 mcg, SC Injection, OD0.390.76

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 in the Volumetric Integral, Cortical, and Trabecular Density (BMD) at the Hip and Lumbar Spine as Measured by Quantitative Computer Tomography (QCT) Scans

QCT is a three-dimensional non-projectional technique to quantify BMD with a number of advantages to other densitometric techniques. Cortical and trabecular bone can be separated, trabecular volume of interest (VOI) are largely independent of degenerative changes in the spine and 3 dimensional geometric parameters can be determined. BMD as measured by QCT is a true density measured in g/cm^3 in contrast to DXA Which determines an areal density measured in g/cm^2. Baseline values were assessed on Day 0. Percent change from Baseline was computed as (change from baseline / baseline value) * 100%. Percent change from Baseline to month 12 in the volumetric integral, cortical, and trabecular density (BMD) at the hip and lumbar spine measured by QCT were reported. (NCT00471237)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and Month 12

,,,,,,
InterventionPercent change in BMD (Mean)
Total vertebra integral VOI BMDMid vertebra integral VOI BMDMid Cylinder trabecular VOI BMDMid Osteo trabecular VOI BMDTotal vertebra trabecular VOI BMDMid Osteo cortical VOI BMD
Alendronate, 70 mg, Capsule, OW5.044.854.885.154.974.98
Placebo-0.98-1.31-2.45-2.21-2.46-0.30
Ronacaleret, 100 mg Tablet, OD1.091.201.751.811.670.63
Ronacaleret, 200 mg Tablet, OD3.004.656.177.065.812.37
Ronacaleret, 300 mg Tablet, OD3.916.068.999.548.522.57
Ronacaleret, 400 mg Tablet, OD4.837.3313.2913.2111.401.22
Teriparatide, 20 mcg, SC Injection, OD14.8017.9724.3724.2123.829.25

[back to top]

Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover: Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BALP)

Blood samples were collected at Baseline (Day 0), Week 4, Month 3, 6, and 12 for measurement of BALP. (NCT00471237)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Week 4, Month 3, 6, and 12

Interventionmcg/L (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineWeek 4Month 3Month 6Month 12
Placebo14.4614.0212.6612.8113.25

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline to Month 12 in the Volumetric Integral, Cortical, and Trabecular Density (BMD) at the Hip as Measured by QCT Scans

QCT is a three-dimensional non-projectional technique to quantify BMD with a number of advantages to other densitometric techniques. Cortical and trabecular bone can be separated, trabecular VOI are largely independent of degenerative changes in the spine and 3 dimensional geometric parameters can be determined. BMD as measured by QCT is a true density measured in mg/cm^3 in contrast to DXA Which determines an areal density measured in g/cm^2. Baseline values were assessed on Day 0. Percent change from Baseline was computed as (change from baseline / baseline value) * 100%. (NCT00471237)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and Month 12

,,,,,,
InterventionPercent change in BMD (Mean)
Femur integral VOI BMDFemur trabecular VOI BMDFemur cortical VOI BMDNeck integral VOI BMDNeck trabecular VOI BMDNeck cortical VOI BMDTrochanter integral VOI BMDTrochanter trabecular VOI BMDTrochanter cortical VOI BMD
Alendronate, 70 mg, Capsule, OW2.703.052.441.652.771.103.153.553.33
Placebo0.02-0.361.11-0.10-0.951.23-0.58-1.620.56
Ronacaleret, 100 mg Tablet, OD-0.05-0.40-0.320.16-2.190.44-0.16-1.34-0.70
Ronacaleret, 200 mg Tablet, OD-0.81-2.16-1.46-0.94-2.68-1.67-1.53-2.54-1.53
Ronacaleret, 300 mg Tablet, OD-0.531.16-1.06-1.201.35-1.85-1.162.12-1.48
Ronacaleret, 400 mg Tablet, OD-0.152.81-1.79-1.453.05-2.80-0.982.10-2.59
Teriparatide, 20 mcg, SC Injection, OD3.9213.190.222.0611.27-0.694.9614.121.99

[back to top]

Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover: Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BALP)

Blood samples were collected at Baseline (Day 0), Week 4, Month 3, 6, and 12 for measurement of BALP. (NCT00471237)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Week 4, Month 3, 6, and 12

,,,,,
Interventionmcg/L (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineBaseline, Placebo contrastWeek 4Week 4, Placebo contrastMonth 3Month 3, Placebo contrastMonth 6Month 6, Placebo contrastMonth 12Month 12, Placebo contrast
Alendronate, 70 mg, Capsule, OW14.310.9913.680.989.440.758.360.658.420.64
Ronacaleret, 100 mg Tablet, OD14.961.0314.721.0515.231.2016.311.2716.641.26
Ronacaleret, 200 mg Tablet, OD14.240.9814.511.0315.441.2217.431.3618.801.42
Ronacaleret, 300 mg Tablet, OD15.061.0415.971.1418.771.4822.181.7323.361.76
Ronacaleret, 400 mg Tablet, OD14.120.9815.721.1217.851.4121.471.6823.281.76
Teriparatide, 20 mcg, SC Injection, OD14.501.0016.191.1516.531.3117.631.3819.081.44

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC 0-t) and Area Under the Concentration-time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC 0-tau) of Ronacaleret

Blood samples were collected and analyzed for concentrations of ronacaleret. The individual blood concentration-time data from the intensive pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics subgroup of participants were analyzed by standard noncompartmental methods. Blood samples were collected and analyzed for concentrations of ronacaleret. The individual blood concentration-time data from the intensive PK-PD subgroup of participants were analyzed by standard noncompartmental methods. Following log transformation, AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-τ) of ronacaleret were separately analyzed by ANOVA using mixed effects model, fitting treatment and country/region as fixed effects. (NCT00471237)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (0.0 h) and 12 h post dose at Week 4, 20, 40 min, 1, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 1-4, 8-12, and 24 h at Month 3, 6 and 12

,,,
Interventionnanogram*hour per millilitre (ng*hr/mL) (Geometric Mean)
AUC 0-t, Month 6AUC 0-t, Month 12AUC 0-tau, Month 6AUC 0-tau, Month 12
Ronacaleret, 100 mg Tablet, OD2495.87512766.68223628.09013922.9369
Ronacaleret, 200 mg Tablet, OD4575.87464548.64906428.55406455.1756
Ronacaleret, 300 mg Tablet, OD7545.33029259.312710825.908314827.6940
Ronacaleret, 400 mg Tablet, OD6712.05376798.42199810.461410079.2847

[back to top]

Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover: Procollagen Type 1 N-terminal Propeptide (P1NP)

Blood samples were collected at Baseline (Day 0), Week 4, Month 3, 6, and 12 for measurement of P1NP. (NCT00471237)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Week 4, Month 3, 6, and 12

,,,,,
InterventionMicrogram per Litre (mcg/L) (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineBaseline, Placebo contrastWeek 4Week 4, Placebo contrastMonth 3Month 3, Placebo contrastMonth 6Month 6, Placebo contrastMonth 12Month 12, Placebo contrast
Alendronate, 70 mg, Capsule, OW47.711.0043.660.9620.150.5116.410.4316.980.42
Teriparatide, 20 mcg, SC Injection, OD48.571.0292.742.0599.742.52117.83.07119.02.92
Ronacaleret, 100 mg Tablet, OD45.590.9649.671.1049.991.2656.371.4761.431.51
Ronacaleret, 200 mg Tablet, OD47.701.0057.361.2765.211.6575.731.9782.692.03
Ronacaleret, 300 mg Tablet, OD46.620.9860.271.3373.681.8690.552.3698.042.41
Ronacaleret, 400 mg Tablet, OD46.190.9763.461.4086.842.20104.62.72112.62.76

[back to top]

Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover: Procollagen Type 1 N-terminal Propeptide (P1NP)

Blood samples were collected at Baseline (Day 0), Week 4, Month 3, 6, and 12 for measurement of P1NP. (NCT00471237)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Week 4, Month 3, 6, and 12

InterventionMicrogram per Litre (mcg/L) (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineWeek 4Month 3Month 6Month 12
Placebo47.6645.3239.5338.4140.74

[back to top]

Blood Concentrations of Ronacaleret

Blood samples were collected and analyzed for concentrations of ronacaleret. The individual blood concentration-time data from the intensive PK-PD subgroup of participants were analyzed by standard noncompartmental methods. Blood concentrations of ronacaleret were reported. (NCT00471237)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (0.0 hour [h]) and 12 h post dose at Week 4, 20, 40 min, 1, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 1-4, 8-12, and 24 h at Month 3, 6 and 12

,,,
Interventionnanograms per millilitre (ng/mL) (Mean)
Week 4, Pre-doseWeek 4, 8-12 h post doseMonth 6, Pre-doseMonth 6, 1-4 h post doseMonth 6, 8-12 h post doseMonth 6, 24 h post doseMonth 12, Pre-doseMonth 12, 1-4 h post doseMonth 12, 8-12 h post doseMonth 12, 24 h post dose
Ronacaleret, 100 mg Tablet, OD41.22204.8221.37644.90186.69186.2120.68779.92203.39187.23
Ronacaleret, 200 mg Tablet, OD37.24328.3365.941308.35385.03290.7433.47999.63262.20297.20
Ronacaleret, 300 mg Tablet, OD85.44581.0874.121610.74576.35578.63147.631819.53651.95626.72
Ronacaleret, 400 mg Tablet, OD79.40685.14117.942054.71796.99473.41114.832128.24740.18512.65

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Weight

Baseline values were assessed on Day 0. Change from Baseline was computed as values at post baseline visit minus Baseline value. Mean change from baseline in weight at Month 6, 12 and early withdrawal were reported. (NCT00471237)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Month 6, 12 and early withdrawal

,,,,,,
InterventionKilogram (Mean)
Month 6Month 12Early withdrawal
Alendronate, 70 mg, Capsule, OW0.290.57-0.12
Placebo-0.020.32-0.45
Ronacaleret, 100 mg Tablet, OD0.27-0.720.40
Ronacaleret, 200 mg Tablet, OD0.451.18-0.34
Ronacaleret, 300 mg Tablet, OD-0.24-0.220.37
Ronacaleret, 400 mg Tablet, OD0.11-0.480.00
Teriparatide, 20 mcg, SC Injection, OD0.510.09-2.15

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Height

Assessments performed on Day 0 were considered as Baseline. Change from Baseline was computed as values at post baseline visit minus Baseline value. Mean change from baseline in height at Month 6 and 12 and early withdrawal were reported. (NCT00471237)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Month 6, 12 and early withdrawal

,,,,,,
InterventionCentimeter (Mean)
Month 6Month 12Early withdrawal
Alendronate, 70 mg, Capsule, OW-0.07-0.08-0.37
Placebo-0.04-0.140.03
Ronacaleret, 100 mg Tablet, OD0.170.040.17
Ronacaleret, 200 mg Tablet, OD0.720.02-0.13
Ronacaleret, 300 mg Tablet, OD0.05-0.09-0.16
Ronacaleret, 400 mg Tablet, OD-0.04-0.17-0.16
Teriparatide, 20 mcg, SC Injection, OD0.110.110

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline to Month 6 in BMD Measured by DXA Scans of the Lumbar Spine (L1-L4)

DXA scanners from Hologic and GE Lunar was used to measure BMD by a DXA scan. At least two vertebrae (L1-L4) that were suitable for measurement of BMD were evaluated. The same scanner was used throughout the study for all measurements for a given participant. DXA scans were sent to a central reading facility for quality control and central analysis. Baseline values were assessed on Day 0. Percent Change from Baseline was computed as (change from baseline / baseline value) * 100%. Percent change from baseline to month 6 in aBMD was reported. (NCT00471237)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and Month 6

Interventionpercent change in BMD (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.66
Ronacaleret, 100 mg Tablet, OD0.21
Ronacaleret, 200 mg Tablet, OD1.61
Ronacaleret, 300 mg Tablet, OD0.47
Ronacaleret, 400 mg Tablet, OD1.01
Alendronate, 70 mg, Capsule, OW3.42

[back to top]

Time Required to Achieve Maximum Concentration of Ronacaleret in Blood (Tmax)

Blood samples were collected and analyzed for concentrations of ronacaleret. The individual blood concentration-time data from the intensive pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics subgroup of participants were analyzed by standard noncompartmental methods. (NCT00471237)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (0.0 h) and 12 h post dose at Week 4, 20, 40 min, 1, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 1-4, 8-12, and 24 h at Month 3, 6 and 12

,,,
Interventionh (Median)
Tmax, Month 6Tmax, Month 12
Ronacaleret, 100 mg Tablet, OD1.4831.000
Ronacaleret, 200 mg Tablet, OD1.2501.500
Ronacaleret, 300 mg Tablet, OD1.7001.500
Ronacaleret, 400 mg Tablet, OD1.5001.500

[back to top]

Mineralizing Surface

Mineralizing surface done on histomorphometric assessment of percutaneous iliac crest bone biopsy. Mineralizing surface measures how much of bone is getting new mineral put on it. The structure and microscopic organization of a small piece of biopsied pelvic bone was analyzed. (NCT00473265)
Timeframe: baseline versus one year

Interventionpercentage of surface (Mean)
BaselineYear 1
PTH1-840.77.1

[back to top]

Percent Change in BMD From Baseline to 24 Months by DXA

Bone Mineral Density (BMD) as measured by Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). (NCT00473265)
Timeframe: baseline versus 24 months

Interventionpercentage of change to BMD (Mean)
Lumbar Spine BMDFemoral Neck BMDDistal 1/3 Radius BMD
PTH1-842.90.95-2.4

[back to top]

Requirements for Calcium Supplementation

Serum and urinary calcium levels maintained by change in requirements for calcium supplementation (NCT00473265)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventiongrams per day of calcium supplementation (Mean)
Starting requirementsRequirements at month 24
PTH1-843.031.66

[back to top]

Cortical Porosity

Cortical porosity done on histomorphometric assessment of percutaneous iliac crest bone biopsy. Cortical Porosity measures how many tiny holes there are in the solid bone section. The structure and microscopic organization of a small piece of biopsied pelvic bone was analyzed. (NCT00473265)
Timeframe: baseline versus two years

Interventionpercentage of porosity (Mean)
BaselineYear 2
PTH1-847.49.2

[back to top]

Trabecular Width

Trabecular width was obtained from histomorphometric assessment of percutaneous iliac crest bone biopsy. Trabecular width is the thickness of individual pieces of the spongy bone section. The structure and microscopic organization of a small piece of biopsied pelvic bone was analyzed. (NCT00473265)
Timeframe: baseline versus two years

Interventionmicrometers (Mean)
BaselineYear 2
PTH1-84144128

[back to top]

Trabecular Number

trabecular number done on histomorphometric assessment of percutaneous iliac crest bone biopsy. Trabecular number is the number of individual pieces of the spongy bone section. The structure and microscopic organization of a small piece of biopsied pelvic bone was analyzed. (NCT00473265)
Timeframe: baseline versus two years

Interventionmm^-1 (Mean)
BaselineYear 2
PTH1-841.742.07

[back to top]

Percent Change in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density: Baseline to Week 12

Percent Change in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density from Baseline to Week 12 (NCT00489918)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Macroflux® Placebo0.97
Macroflux® 20 mcg1.55
Macroflux® 30 mcg2.04
Macroflux® 40 mcg2.5
FORTEO®2.81

[back to top]

Percent Change in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density: Baseline to Week 24

Percent Change in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density from Baseline to Week 24 (NCT00489918)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Macroflux® Placebo-0.634
Macroflux® 20 mcg0.138
Macroflux® 30 mcg0.553
Macroflux® 40 mcg1.331
FORTEO®0.094

[back to top]

Percent Change in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD): Baseline to Week 24

Percent Change in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) from Baseline to Week 24 (NCT00489918)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Macroflux® Placebo-0.33
Macroflux® 20 mcg2.96
Macroflux® 30 mcg3.47
Macroflux® 40 mcg4.97
FORTEO®3.55

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Lumbar Spine BMD: Baseline to Week 12

Absolute Change in Lumbar Spine BMD from Baseline to Week 12 (NCT00489918)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventiong/cm^2 (Mean)
Macroflux® Placebo0.007
Macroflux® 20 mcg0.011
Macroflux® 30 mcg0.014
Macroflux® 40 mcg0.017
FORTEO®0.021

[back to top]

Percent Change in Femoral Neck BMD: Baseline to Week 24

Percent Change in Femoral Neck BMD from Baseline to Week 24 (NCT00489918)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Macroflux® Placebo0.172
Macroflux® 20 mcg0.949
Macroflux® 30 mcg0.599
Macroflux® 40 mcg0.750
FORTEO®-0.012

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in High Resolution Quantitative Computerized Technology (HR-QCT) of Integral and Trabecular Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the 12th Thoracic Vertebra (T12) at 6 Months and 18 Months

Three-dimensional (3-D) microstructure variables of T12 were assessed by HR-QCT. In contrast with regular QCT that assessed 3 millimeter (mm) slide thickness, HR-QCT used segmentation of 1 single vertebra with approximately 100 consecutive slides reconstructed at 300-400 micrometer (µm) slice increments covering the complete vertebral body. Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for age, baseline P1NP, fracture less than 12 months before study start, duration of prior bisphosphonate use, screening glucocorticoid dose, and cumulative glucocorticoid dose before and during the trial. (NCT00503399)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 months, 18 months

,
Interventionmilligram per cubic centimeter (mg/cm^3) (Least Squares Mean)
Integral BMD at 6 monthsIntegral BMD at 18 monthsTrabecular BMD at 6 monthsTrabecular BMD at 18 months
Risedronate-1.910.68-0.870.22
Teriparatide-0.4210.72-0.709.53

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Aminoterminal Propeptide of Type I Procollagen (P1NP) at 3 Months, 6 Months, and 18 Months

P1NP was used as a serum biochemical marker of collagen synthesis, reflecting the formation of new osteoid. (NCT00503399)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 18 months

,
Interventionmicrograms per deciliter (μg/dL) (Least Squares Mean)
P1NP at 3 monthsP1NP at 6 monthsP1NP at 18 months
Risedronate-16.09-16.50-15.58
Teriparatide27.3352.5528.48

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

Summary tables of serious AEs (SAEs) and all other non-serious AEs are located in the Reported Adverse Event Module. Fractures that occurred during the study were collected separately as an additional safety variable. The number of participants experiencing hypercalcemia was summarized for each treatment arm. Hypercalcemia was defined as a serum calcium level corrected for albumin of >2.7 millimole per liter (mmol/L) (10.8 milligram per deciliter [mg/dL]). (NCT00503399)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 18 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Other Non-serious AEsFracturesHypercalcemia
Risedronate223050
Teriparatide132200

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Volumetric Trabecular Bone Mineral Density (BMD) by Quantitative Computerized Tomography (QCT) at 18 Months

Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for age, baseline serum aminoterminal propeptide of Type I procollagen (P1NP), fracture less than 12 months before study start, duration of prior bisphosphonate use, screening glucocorticoid dose, and cumulative glucocorticoid dose before and during the trial. (NCT00503399)
Timeframe: Baseline, 18 months

Interventionmilligram per cubic centimeter (mg/cm^3) (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide12.28
Risedronate2.94

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Type I Collagen Degradation Fragments (β-CTx) at 3 Months, 6 Months, and 18 Months

β-CTx was used as a biochemical marker of bone turnover/resorption, reflecting collagen breakdown of the bone matrix. (NCT00503399)
Timeframe: 3, 6, 18 months

,
Interventionnanograms per deciliter (ng/dL) (Least Squares Mean)
β-CTx at 3 monthsβ-CTx at 6 monthsβ-CTx at 18 months
Risedronate-0.15-0.14-0.11
Teriparatide0.120.250.03

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Volumetric Trabecular Bone Mineral Density (BMD) by Quantitative Computerized Technology (QCT) at 6 Months

Least Squares (LS) Means were adjusted for age, baseline propeptide of Type I procollagen (P1NP), fracture less than 12 months before study start, duration of prior bisphosphonate use, screening glucocorticoid dose, and cumulative glucocorticoid dose before and during the trial. (NCT00503399)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 months

Interventionmilligram per cubic centimeter (mg/cm^3) (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide4.31
Risedronate2.52

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Anterior Bending and Axial Torsion by Finite Element Analysis in the 12th Thoracic Vertebra (T12) at 6 Months and 18 Months: Stiffness and Strength

Anterior bending and axial torsion were measured using HR-QCT-based finite element analysis to determine stiffness and strength of T12. Stiffness evaluated strength of the vertebral body, defined as the slope of the initial step of the force-displacement curve. Strength of the vertebral body was evaluated under compressive loading conditions using computer simulation. LS Means were adjusted for age, baseline P1NP, fracture less than 12 months before study start, duration of prior bisphosphonate use, screening glucocorticoid dose, and cumulative glucocorticoid dose before and during the trial. (NCT00503399)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 months, 18 months

,
InterventionNewton/millimeter/radian (N/mm/rad) (Least Squares Mean)
Anterior bending stiffness at 6 monthsAnterior bending stiffness at 18 monthsAxial torsion stiffness at 6 monthsAxial torsion stiffness at 18 monthsAnterior bending strength at 6 monthsAnterior bending strength at 18 monthsAxial torsion strength at 6 monthsAxial torsion strength at 18 months
Risedronate415705.0233283.077830.756639.38827.24822.03664.02545.8
Teriparatide664969.01209225.0142902.9279392.812490.926046.46127.714181.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Areal Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Lumbar Spine, Femoral Neck, and Total Hip at 18 Months

Dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) techniques validated this measurement at skeletal sites that are at risk of osteoporotic fracture, such as lumbar spine, femoral neck, and hip. (NCT00503399)
Timeframe: Baseline, 18 months

,
Interventiongrams per square centimeter (g/cm^2) (Mean)
Lumbar spine (n=38; n=39)Hip (n=38; n=37)Femoral neck (n=38; n=37)
Risedronate0.0370.007-0.007
Teriparatide0.0680.0140.014

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Axial Compression by Finite Element Analysis in the 12th Thoracic Vertebra (T12) at 6 Months and 18 Months: Stiffness and Strength

Axial compression was measured using HR-QCT-based finite element analysis to determine stiffness and strength of T12. Stiffness evaluated the strength of the vertebral body, defined as the slope of the initial step of the force-displacement curve. Strength of the vertebral body was evaluated under compressive loading conditions using computer simulation. LS Means were adjusted for age, baseline P1NP, fracture less than 12 months before study start, duration of prior bisphosphonate use, screening glucocorticoid dose, and cumulative glucocorticoid dose before and during the trial. (NCT00503399)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 months, 18 months

,
InterventionNewton per millimeter (N/mm) (Least Squares Mean)
Axial compression stiffness at 6 monthsAxial compression stiffness at 18 monthsAxial compression strength at 6 monthsAxial compression strength at 18 months
Risedronate407.6363.7313.6209.4
Teriparatide890.71973.9580.71287.5

[back to top]

Change in Bone Mineral Density, Femoral Neck.

Femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) was analyzed by DXA at Week 24. (NCT00542425)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionPercent change from baseline (Mean)
Placebo0.79
BA058 20 µg2.69
BA058 40 µg2.20
BA058 80 µg3.07
Teriparatide1.07

[back to top]

Change in Bone Mineral Density, Total Hip.

Total analyzable hip bone mineral density (BMD) was analyzed by DXA at Week 24. (NCT00542425)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionPercent change from baseline (Mean)
Placebo0.39
BA058 20 µg1.43
BA058 40 µg1.97
BA058 80 µg2.60
Teriparatide0.45

[back to top]

Change in Marker of Bone Metabolism, PINP

PINP, N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen, is a marker of anabolic bone growth. (NCT00542425)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionPercent change from baseline (Mean)
Placebo-13.1
BA058 20 µg20.0
BA058 40 µg90.8
BA058 80 µg97.2
Teriparatide154.3

[back to top]

Change in Bone Mineral Density, Total Spine.

Total analyzable spine bone mineral density (BMD) was analyzed by DXA at Week 24. (NCT00542425)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionPercent change from baseline (Mean)
Placebo1.22
BA058 20 µg3.30
BA058 40 µg5.21
BA058 80 µg6.11
Teriparatide5.47

[back to top]

Change in Bone Mineral Density, Total Spine.

Total analyzable spine bone mineral density (BMD) was analyzed by DXA at Week 48. (NCT00542425)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionPercent change from baseline (Mean)
Placebo0.74
BA058 20 µg5.14
BA058 40 µg9.84
BA058 80 µg12.94
Teriparatide8.63

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in the Estimate of Bone Strength of Lumbar Spine at Month 18 Endpoint

Finite Element Analysis of computed tomography (CT) data from spine is used to estimate the strength of a vertebral body using a virtual axial load. Least squares (LS) mean of the percent change from baseline to 18 months is from an analysis of variance (ANOVA). The model included terms for investigator site and prior bisphosphonate use. (NCT00557310)
Timeframe: Baseline, 18 months

Intervention% change of Newtons (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide17.43

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Hip at Month 18 Endpoint

Volumetric BMD is a measure of the amount of mineral in a given volume of bone. Least squares (LS) mean of the percent change from baseline to 18 months is from an analysis of variance (ANOVA). The model included terms for investigator site and prior bisphosphonate use. (NCT00557310)
Timeframe: Baseline, 18 months

Intervention% change of mg/cm³ (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide2.22

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Lumbar Spine at Month 18 Endpoint

Volumetric BMD is a measure of the amount of mineral in a given volume of bone, expressed as milligram per cubic centimeter (mg/cm³). Least squares (LS) mean of the percent change from baseline to 18 months is from an analysis of variance (ANOVA). The model included terms for investigator site and prior bisphosphonate use. (NCT00557310)
Timeframe: Baseline, 18 months

Intervention% change of mg/cm³ (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide10.05

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Areal BMD at the Femoral Neck at Month 18 and 24 Endpoint

Areal BMD is a measure of the amount of mineral in a given area of bone. Least squares (LS) mean of the percent change from baseline to 18 and 24 months is from an analysis of variance (ANOVA). The model included terms for investigator site and prior bisphosphonate use. (NCT00557310)
Timeframe: Baseline, 18, 24 months

Intervention% change of g/cm² (Least Squares Mean)
18 month percent change (n=28)24 month percent change (n=25)
Teriparatide2.7922.762

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Areal BMD at the Lumbar Spine at Month 18 and 24 Endpoint

Areal BMD is a measure of the amount of mineral in a given area of bone. Least squares (LS) mean of the percent change from baseline to 18 and 24 months is from an analysis of variance (ANOVA). The model included terms for investigator site and prior bisphosphonate use. (NCT00557310)
Timeframe: Baseline, 18, 24 months

Intervention% change of g/square centimeter (g/cm²) (Least Squares Mean)
18 month percent change (n=28)24 month percent change (n=25)
Teriparatide7.2158.702

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Areal BMD at Ultra-Distal Radius at Month 18 and 24 Endpoint

Areal BMD is a measure of the amount of mineral in a given area of bone. Least squares (LS) mean of the percent change from baseline to 18 and 24 months is from an analysis of variance (ANOVA). The model included terms for investigator site and prior bisphosphonate use. (NCT00557310)
Timeframe: Baseline, 18, 24 months

Intervention% change of g/cm² (Least Squares Mean)
18 month percent change (n=28)24 month percent change (n=25)
Teriparatide-1.8910.776

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Areal BMD Responses at Total Hip at Month 18 and 24 Endpoint

Areal BMD is a measure of the amount of mineral in a given area of bone. Least squares (LS) mean of the percent change from baseline to 18 and 24 months is from an analysis of variance (ANOVA). The model included terms for investigator site and prior bisphosphonate use. (NCT00557310)
Timeframe: Baseline, 18, 24 months

Intervention% change of g/cm² (Least Squares Mean)
18 month percent change (n=28)24 month percent change (n=25)
Teriparatide0.2921.482

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Volume (BV)/Total Volume (TV) Ratio in the Distal Radius at Month 18 and 24 Endpoint

BV/TV is the estimate of the ratio of detectable bone relative to the total volume of the region of interest. Least squares (LS) mean of the percent change from baseline to 18, 24 months is from a mixed model repeated measurements analysis. The model included terms for investigator site, prior bisphosphonate use, visit and baseline. (NCT00557310)
Timeframe: Baseline, 18, 24 months

Intervention% change of ratio (Least Squares Mean)
18 month percent change (n=25)24 month percent change (n=21)
Teriparatide0.36-3.14

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Cortical Thickness (CT) in the Distal Radius at Month 18 and 24 Endpoint

Cortical thickness (CT) is the thickness of both cortices in a given volume of bone. Least squares (LS) mean of the percent change from baseline to 18, 24 months is from a mixed model repeated measurements analysis. The model included terms for investigator site, prior bisphosphonate use, visit and baseline. (NCT00557310)
Timeframe: Baseline, 18, 24 months

Intervention% change of millimeter (mm) (Least Squares Mean)
18 month percent change (n=25)24 month percent change (n=21)
Teriparatide-0.61-0.22

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Carboxyterminal Cross-Linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTX) at Month 3, 6 and 24 Endpoint

CTX is a measure of bone resorption. Least squares (LS) mean of the percent change from baseline to 3, 6, 24 months is from a mixed model repeated measurements analysis. The model included terms for investigator site, prior bisphosphonate use, visit and baseline. (NCT00557310)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3, 6, 24 months

Intervention% change of nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) (Least Squares Mean)
3 month percent change (n=32)6 month percent change (n=30)24 month percent change (n=23)
Teriparatide63.53102.5648.28

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Procollagen Type I N-Terminal Propeptide (PINP) at Month 3, 6 and 24 Endpoint

PINP is a measure of bone formation. Least squares (LS) mean of the percent change from baseline to 3, 6, 24 months is from a mixed model repeated measurements analysis. The model included terms for investigator site, prior bisphosphonate use, visit and baseline. (NCT00557310)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3, 6, 24 months

Intervention% change of microgram/Liter (µg/L) (Least Squares Mean)
3 month percent change (n=32)6 month percent change (n=30)24 month percent change (n=23)
Teriparatide145.35238.04118.91

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Surface-to-Curve Ratio (SCR) at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 Endpoint

SCR is a measure of the computed ratio of plate-like to rod-like structures in a given volume of trabecular bone and reflects the integrity of the trabecular network. The higher the value for SCR, the more intact the trabecular network. Least squares (LS) mean of the percent change from baseline to 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months is from a mixed model repeated measurements analysis. The model included terms for investigator site, prior bisphosphonate use, visit and baseline. (NCT00557310)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months

Intervention% change of ratio (Least Squares Mean)
3 month percent change (n=32)6 month percent change (n=30)12 month percent change (n=28)18 month percent change (n=25)24 month percent change (n=21)
Teriparatide-3.380.432.364.531.44

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Topological Erosion Index (TEI) in the Distal Radius at Month 18 and 24 Endpoint

TEI is the ratio of the sum of topological parameters expected to increase with bone erosion compared to the sum of those expected to decrease. The lower the value for TEI, the more intact the trabecular network. Least squares (LS) mean of the percent change from baseline to 18, 24 months is from a mixed model repeated measurements analysis. The model included terms for investigator site, prior bisphosphonate use, visit and baseline. (NCT00557310)
Timeframe: Baseline, 18, 24 months

Intervention% change of ratio (Least Squares Mean)
18 month percent change (n=25)24 month percent change (n=21)
Teriparatide3.368.46

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Surface-to-Curve Ratio (SCR) in the Distal Radius at Month 18 Endpoint

SCR is a measure of the computed ratio of plate-like to rod-like structures in a given volume of trabecular bone and reflects the integrity of the trabecular network. The higher the value for SCR, the more intact the trabecular network. Least squares (LS) mean of the percent change from baseline to 18 months is from a mixed model repeated measurements analysis. The model included terms for investigator site, prior bisphosphonate use, visit and baseline. (NCT00557310)
Timeframe: Baseline, 18 months

Interventionpercent (%) change of ratio (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide4.53

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Surface-to-Curve Ratio (SCR) in the Distal Radius at Month 24 Endpoint

SCR is a measure of the computed ratio of plate-like to rod-like structures in a given volume of trabecular bone and reflects the integrity of the trabecular network. The higher the value for SCR, the more intact the trabecular network. Least squares (LS) mean of the percent change from baseline to 24 months is from a mixed model repeated measurements analysis. The model included terms for investigator site, prior bisphosphonate use, visit and baseline. (NCT00557310)
Timeframe: Baseline, 24 months

Intervention% change of ratio (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide1.44

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in the Estimate of Bone Strength of Hip at Month 18 Endpoint

Finite Element Analysis of computed tomography (CT) data from hip is used to estimate the strength of the proximal femur with a virtual sideways fall. Least squares (LS) mean of the percent change from baseline to 18 months is from an analysis of variance (ANOVA). The model included terms for investigator site and prior bisphosphonate use. (NCT00557310)
Timeframe: Baseline, 18 months

Intervention% change of Newtons (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide2.54

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Areal BMD at ⅓ Distal Radius at Month 18 and 24 Endpoint

Areal BMD is a measure of the amount of mineral in a given area of bone. Least squares (LS) mean of the percent change from baseline to 18 and 24 months is from an analysis of variance (ANOVA). The model included terms for investigator site and prior bisphosphonate use. (NCT00557310)
Timeframe: Baseline, 18, 24 months

Intervention% change of g/cm² (Least Squares Mean)
18 month percent change (n=28)24 month percent change (n=25)
Teriparatide-2.068-2.733

[back to top]

Summary of Subject Perceptions (Attributes) Assessments - Easy to Hold the Pen While Injecting

To assess overall subject perception of the device performance and acceptability through a questionnaire completed by all subjects at Visit 3. Subject perception of how easy it was to hold the pen while injecting. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1 = Strongly Disagree2345 = Strongly Agree
Forteo B Pen Users02829159

[back to top]

Summary of Subject Preference Assessments - Assurance That Drug is Delivered

To assess subject preferences for assurance that drug is delivered for the Forteo 1.1 Pen or the Forteo B Pen through a questionnaire at Visit 2 completed by subjects who switch from the Forteo 1.1 Pen prior to the study entry to the Forteo B Pen during study participation. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1 = Strong Preference for Forteo 1.1 Pen23 = No Preference45 = Strong Preference for Forteo B Pen
Forteo 1.1 Pen Users43231646

[back to top]

Summary of Subject Preference Assessments - Attaching a New Needle

To assess subject preferences for attaching a new needle for the Forteo 1.1 Pen or the Forteo B Pen through a questionnaire at Visit 2 completed by subjects who switch from the Forteo 1.1 Pen prior to the study entry to the Forteo B Pen during study participation. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1 = Strong Preference for Forteo 1.1 Pen23 = No Preference45 = Strong Preference for Forteo B Pen
Forteo 1.1 Pen Users2036846

[back to top]

Summary of Subject Preference Assessments - Force on the Plunger Needed to Inject a Dose

To assess subject preferences for force on the plunger needed to inject a dose for the Forteo 1.1 Pen or the Forteo B Pen through a questionnaire at Visit 2 completed by subjects who switch from the Forteo 1.1 Pen prior to the study entry to the Forteo B Pen during study participation. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1 = Strong Preference for Forteo 1.1 Pen23 = No Preference45 = Strong Preference for Forteo B Pen
Forteo 1.1 Pen Users23141162

[back to top]

Summary of Subject Preference Assessments - Injecting a Dose

To assess subject preferences for injecting a dose for the Forteo 1.1 Pen or the Forteo B Pen through a questionnaire at Visit 2 completed by subjects who switch from the Forteo 1.1 Pen prior to the study entry to the Forteo B Pen during study participation. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1 = Strong Preference for Forteo 1.1 Pen23 = No Preference45 = Strong Preference for Forteo B Pen
Forteo 1.1 Pen Users2116667

[back to top]

Summary of Subject Preference Assessments - Learning to Use the Pen

To assess subject preferences for learning to use the pen for the Forteo 1.1 Pen or the Forteo B Pen through a questionnaire at Visit 2 completed by subjects who switch from the Forteo 1.1 Pen prior to the study entry to the Forteo B Pen during study participation. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1 = Strong Preference for Forteo 1.1 Pen23 = No Preference45 = Strong Preference for Forteo B Pen
Forteo 1.1 Pen Users208775

[back to top]

Summary of Subject Preference Assessments - Overall Ease of Use

To assess subject preferences for overall ease of use for the Forteo 1.1 Pen or the Forteo B Pen through a questionnaire at Visit 2 completed by subjects who switch from the Forteo 1.1 Pen prior to the study entry to the Forteo B Pen during study participation. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1 = Strong Preference for Forteo 1.1 Pen23 = No Preference45 = Strong Preference for Forteo B Pen
Forteo 1.1 Pen Users134381

[back to top]

Summary of Subject Preference Assessments - Overall Preference

To assess overall subject preferences for the Forteo 1.1 Pen or the Forteo B Pen through a questionnaire at Visit 2 completed by subjects who switch from the Forteo 1.1 Pen prior to the study entry to the Forteo B Pen during study participation. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1 = Strong Preference for Forteo 1.1 Pen23 = No Preference45 = Strong Preference for Forteo B Pen
Forteo 1.1 Pen Users214679

[back to top]

Summary of Subject Preference Assessments - Removing a Used Needle

To assess subject preferences for removing a used needle for the Forteo 1.1 Pen or the Forteo B Pen through a questionnaire at Visit 2 completed by subjects who switch from the Forteo 1.1 Pen prior to the study entry to the Forteo B Pen during study participation. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1 = Strong Preference for Forteo 1.1 Pen23 = No Preference45 = Strong Preference for Forteo B Pen
Forteo 1.1 Pen Users3136745

[back to top]

Summary of Subject Preference Assessments - Setting the Dose

To assess subject preferences for setting the dose for the Forteo 1.1 Pen or the Forteo B Pen through a questionnaire at Visit 2 completed by subjects who switch from the Forteo 1.1 Pen prior to the study entry to the Forteo B Pen during study participation. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1 = Strong Preference for Forteo 1.1 Pen23 = No Preference45 = Strong Preference for Forteo B Pen
Forteo 1.1 Pen Users203879

[back to top]

Summary of Subject Preference Assessments - Use of the User Manual/Instructions for Use That Came With the Pen

To assess subject preferences for use of the User Manual/Instructions for Use that came with the pen for the Forteo 1.1 Pen or the Forteo B Pen through a questionnaire at Visit 2 completed by subjects who switch from the Forteo 1.1 Pen prior to the study entry to the Forteo B Pen during study participation. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1 = Strong Preference for Forteo 1.1 Pen23 = No Preference45 = Strong Preference for Forteo B Pen
Forteo 1.1 Pen Users3215963

[back to top]

Summary of Forteo B Pen Complaints at 46 Weeks

Summary of number of complaints, and common complaints (at least 3% complaint rate), from subjects using Forteo B Pen. Functional Complaints were related to device malfunction; Nonfunctional were related to either cosmetic or perception concerns. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 46 weeks

Interventionnumber of complaints (Number)
All ComplaintsComplaint Category: FunctionalFunctional (3%): Stopped working, wouldn't injectComplaint Category: NonfunctionalNonfunctional (4%): Pen too large, awkward, bulkyComplaint Category: User Manual RelatedUser Manual (3.5%): No information on alcohol swab
Forteo B Pen Users5896328177

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Forteo B Pen Complaints at 8 Weeks

Number of subjects with complaints after 8 weeks, and common complaints (at least 3% complaint rate), using Forteo B Pen. Functional Complaints were related to device malfunction; Nonfunctional were related to either cosmetic or perception concerns. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionnumber of participants with complaints (Number)
All ComplaintsComplaint Category: FunctionalComplaint Category: NonfunctionalNonfunctional (4%): Pen too large, awkward, bulkyComplaint Category: User Manual RelatedUser Manual (3.5%): No information on alcohol swab
Forteo B Pen Users314198147

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Forteo B Pen Complaints at 46 Weeks

Number of subjects with complaints after 46 weeks, and common complaints (at least 3% complaint rate), using Forteo B Pen. Functional Complaints were related to device malfunction; Nonfunctional were related to either cosmetic or perception concerns. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 46 weeks

Interventionnumber of participants with complaints (Number)
All ComplaintsComplaint Category: FunctionalFunctional (3%): Stopped working, wouldn't injectComplaint Category: NonfunctionalNonfunctional (4%): Pen too large, awkward, bulkyComplaint Category: User Manual RelatedUser Manual (3.5%): No information on alcohol swab
Forteo B Pen Users3796218147

[back to top]

Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - Easy to Remove Pen From Package

To assess overall subject perception of the device performance and acceptability through a questionnaire completed by all subjects at Visit 3. Subject perception of how easy it was to remove the pen from the package. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1 = Strongly Disagree2345 = Strongly Agree
Forteo B Pen Users00519174

[back to top]

Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - Easy to Remove The Pen Cap

To assess overall subject perception of the device performance and acceptability through a questionnaire completed by all subjects at Visit 3. Subject perception of how easy it was to remove the pen cap. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1 = Strongly Disagree2345 = Strongly Agree
Forteo B Pen Users00115182

[back to top]

Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - Easy to Remove a Used Needle

To assess overall subject perception of the device performance and acceptability through a questionnaire completed by all subjects at Visit 3. Subject perception of how easy it was to remove a used needle. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1 = Strongly Disagree2345 = Strongly Agree
Forteo B Pen Users02918168

[back to top]

Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - Easy to Read Label

To assess overall subject perception of the device performance and acceptability through a questionnaire completed by all subjects at Visit 3. Subject perception of how easy it was to read the label. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1 = Strongly Disagree2345 = Strongly Agree
Forteo B Pen Users02625165

[back to top]

Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - Easy to Push the Black Injections Button to Administer the Dose

To assess overall subject perception of the device performance and acceptability through a questionnaire completed by all subjects at Visit 3. Subject perception of how easy it was to push the black injections button to administer the dose. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1 = Strongly Disagree2345 = Strongly Agree
Forteo B Pen Users00419175

[back to top]

Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - Easy to Learn to Use the Pen

To assess overall subject perception of the device performance and acceptability through a questionnaire completed by all subjects at Visit 3. Subject perception of how easy it was to learn to use the pen. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1 = Strongly Disagree2345 = Strongly Agree
Forteo B Pen Users11016180

[back to top]

Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - Easy to Attach a New Needle

To assess overall subject perception of the device performance and acceptability through a questionnaire completed by all subjects at Visit 3. Subject perception of how easy it was to attach a new needle. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1 = Strongly Disagree2345 = Strongly Agree
Forteo B Pen Users10517175

[back to top]

Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - Convenient for Me to Use

To assess overall subject perception of the device performance and acceptability through a questionnaire completed by all subjects at Visit 3. Subject perception of how convenient Forteo B Pen was to use. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1 = Strongly Disagree2345 = Strongly Agree
Forteo B Pen Users01119177

[back to top]

Summary of Subject Perception (Attibutes) Assessments - Easy to Replace The Pen Cap

To assess overall subject perception of the device performance and acceptability through a questionnaire completed by all subjects at Visit 3. Subject perception of how easy it was to replace the pen cap. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1 = Strongly Disagree2345 = Strongly Agree
Forteo B Pen Users00014184

[back to top]

Summary of Forteo B Pen Complaints at 8 Weeks

Summary of number of complaints, and common complaints (at least 3% complaint rate), from subjects using Forteo B Pen. Functional Complaints were related to device malfunction; Nonfunctional were related to either cosmetic or perception concerns. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionnumber of complaints (Number)
All ComplaintsComplaint Category: FunctionalComplaint Category: NonfunctionalNonfunctional (4%): Pen too large, awkward, bulkyComplaint Category: User Manual RelatedUser Manual (3.5%): No information on alcohol swab
Forteo B Pen Users474278167

[back to top]

Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - Easy to Set the Dose

To assess overall subject perception of the device performance and acceptability through a questionnaire completed by all subjects at Visit 3. Subject perception of how easy it was to set the dose. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1 = Strongly Disagree2345 = Strongly Agree
Forteo B Pen Users1139183

[back to top]

Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - Easy to Use the Forteo B Pen Instructions For Use

To assess overall subject perception of the device performance and acceptability through a questionnaire completed by all subjects at Visit 3. Subject perception of how easy it was to use the Forteo B Pen Instructions for Use. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1 = Strongly Disagree2345 = Strongly Agree
Forteo B Pen Users00816174

[back to top]

Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - Helps Me Manage My Osteoporosis At Home

To assess overall subject perception of the device performance and acceptability through a questionnaire completed by all subjects at Visit 3. Subject perception of whether the Forteo B Pen helps them manage their osteoporosis when they are at home. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1 = Strongly Disagree2345 = Strongly Agree
Forteo B Pen Users01315179

[back to top]

Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - Helps Me Manage My Osteoporosis Away From Home

To assess overall subject perception of the device performance and acceptability through a questionnaire completed by all subjects at Visit 3. Subject perception of whether the Forteo B Pen helps them manage their osteoporosis when they are away from home. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1 = Strongly Disagree2345 = Strongly Agree
Forteo B Pen Users251926142

[back to top]

Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - How Confident Are You That You Receive the Medication With Your Forteo B Pen

To assess overall subject perception of the device performance and acceptability through a questionnaire completed by all subjects at Visit 3. Subject perception of how confident they were that they received the medication with the Forteo B Pen. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1 = Not At All Confident2345 = Very Confident
Forteo B Pen Users241032149

[back to top]

Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - Overall Ease of Use

To assess overall subject perception of the device performance and acceptability through a questionnaire completed by all subjects at Visit 3. Subject perception of the overall ease of use. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1 = Strongly Disagree2345 = Strongly Agree
Forteo B Pen Users00118179

[back to top]

Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - Reduces My Reluctance to Take Injections

To assess overall subject perception of the device performance and acceptability through a questionnaire completed by all subjects at Visit 3. Subject perception of whether the Forteo B Pen reduces their reluctance to take injections. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1 = Strongly Disagree2345 = Strongly Agree
Forteo B Pen Users321427151

[back to top]

Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - Reusing Needles

To assess overall subject perception of the device performance and acceptability through a questionnaire completed by all subjects at Visit 3. Subject response on whether or not they sometimes reuse needles. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
NoYes - OccasionallyYes - OftenYes - Rarely
Forteo B Pen Users197001

[back to top]

Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - To What Extent Are You Satisfied With the Forteo B Pen

To assess overall subject perception of the device performance and acceptability through a questionnaire completed by all subjects at Visit 3. Subject perception of how satisfied they were with the Forteo B Pen. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1 = Very Dissatisfied2345 = Very Satisfied
Forteo B Pen Users00418176

[back to top]

Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - What Could Be Done to Improve the Forteo B Pen Instructions For Use

To assess overall subject perception of the device performance and acceptability through a questionnaire completed by all subjects at Visit 3. Subject perception of what could be done to improve the Forteo B Pen Instructions for Use. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Larger PrintMore ColorLess ColorMore PicturesLess PicturesMore Detail in the DescriptionLess Detail in the DescriptionMore Questions and AnswersNo Improvements Needed
Forteo B Pen Users22517310111156

[back to top]

Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - When Do You Attach a Needle

To assess overall subject perception of the device performance and acceptability through a questionnaire completed by all subjects at Visit 3. Subject response on when they attach a needle to their Forteo B Pen. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Immediately Before Each InjectionSeveral Hours Before Each UseAt Home If Injection Is Completed Away From HomeOther
Forteo B Pen Users197250

[back to top]

Summary of Subject Perception (Attributes) Assessments - When Do You Remove the Needle

To assess overall subject perception of the device performance and acceptability through a questionnaire completed by all subjects at Visit 3. Subject response on when they remove the needle from their Forteo B Pen. (NCT00577863)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
ImmediatelyWhen I Get Home If Injection Completed AwayOther
Forteo B Pen Users19701

[back to top]

Healing of a Fracture From a Low Energy Fall

Callus formation at the fracture site as defined by a CT scan to determine healing (early/beginning callus formation) or healed (complete callus formation) (NCT00594906)
Timeframe: Measured at 16 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
HealedHealingDid not compelte CT scan
Forteo Patients142
Placebo Patients012

[back to top]

Change in Lumbar Spine Bone Density by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA)

Areal BMD at the lumbar spine was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, if possible. (NCT00697463)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 18 or 24 reported

Interventionpercentage of BMD change (Mean)
Women With Idiopathic Osteoporosis (IOP)10.8

[back to top]

The Level of Activated Vitamin D (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D) After Parathyroid Hormone Infusion at Baseline, 4 and 8 Hours

1,25-D was measured at baseline, 4 and 8 hours after PTH infusion (NCT00754442)
Timeframe: baseline, 4 and 8 hours after start of infusion

,
Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
Baseline4 hours8 hours
Controls46.258.8105
Group 140.639.856.4

[back to top]

The Number of Patients With Mutations in CYP27B1

CYP27B1 gene (the gene for 25-hydroxyvitamin D-1-alpha hydroxylase) was sequenced for all in patient group and compared with published control data (NCT00754442)
Timeframe: blood samples taken at baseline and sequenced over several days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Patients0

[back to top]

Percent Change in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density

Percent increase or decrease in lumbar spine bone mineral density between baseline and 6 months (treatment period) (NCT00759772)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

Interventionpercentage of change (Mean)
Teriparatide5.6
Placebo0.2

[back to top]

BMD at Left Total Hip

Bone mineral density (gm/cm2) of the total hip region of interest on the left (NCT00826228)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 months

Intervention% change in BMD (gm/cm2) from baseline (Mean)
PTH/Weight-Bearing0.02

[back to top]

P1NP

amino-terminal propeptide of type I collagen (P1NP) (NCT00826228)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 months

Intervention% change from baseline (Mean)
PTH/Weight-Bearing61.4

[back to top]

Total Serum Calcium (mg/dl)

(NCT00853723)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90

,,
Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
BaselineDay 15Day 30Day 60Day 90, time 0Day 90, time 3 hoursday 90, time 6 hours
PTH 20 mcg/Day9.499.579.559.589.449.759.78
PTHrP 400 mcg/Day9.489.959.739.719.569.909.90
PTHrP 600 mcg/Day9.519.879.679.619.459.769.81

[back to top]

Tubular Maximum for Phosphorous/Glomerular Filtration Rate (TMP/GFR)

"Fractional tubular reabsorption of phosphate (TRP) = 1-{(U phos/P phos) x ( P creat/U creat)} if TRP < or = 0.86 then TMP/GFR = TRP x P phos if TRP > 0.86 then TMP/GFR = 0.3 x TRP/{1-(0.8 x TRP)} x P phos~U= urine, P = plasma" (NCT00853723)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90

,,
Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
BaselineDay 15Day 30Day 60Day 90
PTH 20 mcg/Day3.964.184.034.284.00
PTHrP 400 mcg/Day3.803.783.884.024.11
PTHrP 600 mcg/Day3.713.473.613.843.90

[back to top]

24 Hour Urine Calcium

(NCT00853723)
Timeframe: 90 days

,,
Interventionmg/gm creatinine (Mean)
BaselineDay 90
PTH 20 mcg/Day209.99232.48
PTHrP 400 mcg/Day206.37260.46
PTHrP 600 mcg/Day213.07235.25

[back to top]

Serum Phosphorous

(NCT00853723)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90

,,
Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
BaselineDay 15Day 30Day 60Day 90
PTH 20 mcg/Day4.094.134.194.284.10
PTHrP 400 mcg/Day4.03.783.874.024.05
PTHrP 600 mcg/Day3.933.683.713.973.98

[back to top]

Fractional Excretion of Calcium

(Serum Creatinine X Urine Calcium)/(Serum Calcium X Urine Creatinine) (NCT00853723)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90

,,
Intervention% excreted (Mean)
BaselineDay 15Day 30Day 60Day 90
PTH 20 mcg/Day2.302.552.922.953.37
PTHrP 400 mcg/Day2.383.423.273.383.10
PTHrP 600 mcg/Day2.714.183.742.892.89

[back to top]

Procallagen-1 Amino-terminal Peptide (P1NP)

(NCT00853723)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90

,,
Interventionpercentage change from baseline (Mean)
Day 15Day 30Day 60Day 90
PTH 20 mcg/Day60.6797.27125.46171.49
PTHrP 400 mcg/Day32.5448.8934.7146.07
PTHrP 600 mcg/Day23.5183.1487.3984.09

[back to top]

Changes in Bone Mineral Density of the Lumbar Spine.

(NCT00853723)
Timeframe: 90 days

InterventionPercent change from baseline (Mean)
PTHrP 400 mcg/Day1.89
PTHrP 600 mcg/Day1.52
PTH 20 mcg/Day2.17

[back to top]

Changes in Bone Mineral Density of the Forearm.

(NCT00853723)
Timeframe: 90 days

InterventionPercent change from baseline (Mean)
PTHrP 400 mcg/Day-0.48
PTHrP 600 mcg/Day-0.99
PTH 20 mcg/Day-0.97

[back to top]

Changes in Bone Mineral Density of the Femoral Neck.

(NCT00853723)
Timeframe: 90 days

InterventionPercent change from baseline (Mean)
PTHrP 400 mcg/Day0.91
PTHrP 600 mcg/Day0.54
PTH 20 mcg/Day0.61

[back to top]

Changes in Bone Mineral Density of the Distal 1/3 Radius.

(NCT00853723)
Timeframe: 90 days

InterventionPercent change from baseline (Mean)
PTHrP 400 mcg/Day-0.35
PTHrP 600 mcg/Day-0.34
PTH 20 mcg/Day-0.82

[back to top]

Changes in Bone Mineral Density of the Total Hip.

(NCT00853723)
Timeframe: 90 days

InterventionPercent change from baseline (Mean)
PTHrP 400 mcg/Day0.68
PTHrP 600 mcg/Day0.72
PTH 20 mcg/Day0.54

[back to top]

1,25 Vitamin D

(NCT00853723)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90

,,
Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
BaselineDay 15Day 30Day 60Day 90
PTH 20 mcg/Day42.5165.2567.2958.1553.73
PTHrP 400 mcg/Day49.0684.9276.0467.8564.36
PTHrP 600 mcg/Day42.4963.0765.1557.0255.08

[back to top]

Carboxy-terminal Telopeptides of Collagen-1 (CTX)

(NCT00853723)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90

,,
Interventionpercentage change from baseline (Mean)
Day 15Day 30Day 60Day 90
PTH 20 mcg/Day4.8713.8952.9892.46
PTHrP 400 mcg/Day-12.401.604.1332.65
PTHrP 600 mcg/Day10.259.5914.3825.65

[back to top]

Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Visual analog pain scale is a measurement instrument to measure the level of hip pain. Scores range from 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) with higher score indicating greater pain. Least squares (LS) means obtained from mixed model repeated measures analysis including as fixed effects treatment and time with interaction, further adjusted for type of fracture (31-A1/31-A2), type of reduction (open/close), use of opioids (Yes/No), use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, adequate reduction (Yes/No) and interaction between treatment and adequate reduction. (NCT00887354)
Timeframe: 6, 12, 18, and 26 Weeks

,
Interventionmillimeter (mm) (Least Squares Mean)
Week 6Week 12Week 18Week 26
Risedronate23.5419.2418.1913.74
Teriparatide16.449.286.904.48

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reporting Hip Pain in Modification of the Charnley's Pain Scale

Self-reported hip pain scale in which 0=no pain; 1=pain is slight or intermittent, pain on starting to walk but getting less with normal activity; 2=pain occurs only after some activity, disappears quickly with rest; 3=pain is tolerable, permitting limited activity; 4=pain is severe on attempting to walk, prevents all activity; 5=pain is severe and spontaneous. (NCT00887354)
Timeframe: Baseline

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
0-No pain1- Pain slight or intermittent2- Pain occurs only after some activity3- Pain is tolerable4- Pain severe on attempting to walk5- Pain severe and spontaneous
Risedronate8.212.920.038.815.34.7
Teriparatide9.44.723.536.520.05.9

[back to top]

Change in Lumbar Spine Areal Bone Mineral Density

Least squares (LS) means obtained from mixed model repeated measures analysis including as fixed effects treatment and time with interaction, further adjusted for baseline lumbar spine BMD, type of hip fracture (31-A1/31-A2) and glucocorticoids used at baseline (Yes/No). (NCT00887354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26; Baseline, Week 52

,
Interventiong/cm^2 (Least Squares Mean)
Week 26Week 52
Risedronate0.0320.044
Teriparatide0.0530.078

[back to top]

Change in Areal Bone Mineral Density Measured at the Femoral Neck and Total Hip of the Non-Fractured Limb

"Femoral neck BMD: Least squares (LS) means obtained from mixed model repeated measures analysis including as fixed effects treatment and time with interaction, further adjusted for baseline femoral neck BMD and type of hip fracture (31-A1/31-A2) .~Total hip BMD: Least squares (LS) means obtained from mixed model repeated measures analysis including as fixed effects treatment and time with interaction, further adjusted for baseline total hip BMD, type of hip fracture (31-A1/31-A2) and duration of prior bisphosphonate use." (NCT00887354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26; Baseline, Week 52; Baseline, Week 78

,
Interventiong/cm^2 (Least Squares Mean)
Total Hip 26 WeeksTotal Hip 52 WeeksTotal Hip 78 WeeksFemoral Neck 26 WeeksFemoral Neck 52 WeeksFemoral Neck 78 Weeks
Risedronate-0.001-0.0010.005-0.009-0.006-0.007
Teriparatide-0.0010.0010.0070.002-0.0000.012

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Physical Component Summary of the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Questionnaire

SF-36 is a self-reported questionnaire consisting of 36 questions covering 8 health domains. Each domain was scored by summing the individual items and transforming the scores into a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status or functioning. The physical component summary (PCS) has been constructed based on the 8 SF-36 domains and consist of the physical functioning, bodily pain, role-physical, and general health scales (range = 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status for functioning). Least squares (LS) means obtained from mixed model repeated measures analysis including as fixed effects treatment and time with interaction, further adjusted for type of hip fracture (31-A1/31-A2) and adequate reduction (Yes/No). (NCT00887354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6; Baseline, Week 12; Baseline, Week 18; Baseline, Week 26

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 6Week 12Week 18Week 26
Risedronate5.1011.0912.8114.36
Teriparatide7.3711.3214.3716.34

[back to top]

"Timed Up and Go Test"

"Timed Up and Go test measures, in seconds, the time taken by an individual to stand up from a standard chair, walk a distance of 3 meters, turn, walk back to the chair, and sit down. Least squares (LS) means obtained from mixed model repeated measures analysis including as fixed effects treatment and time with interaction, further adjusted for age, type of fracture (31-A1/31-A2), type of reduction (open/close), type of walking aid, baseline SF-36 PCS and baseline Charnley's pain score." (NCT00887354)
Timeframe: 6, 12, 18, and 26 Weeks

,
Interventionseconds (sec) (Least Squares Mean)
Week 6Week 12Week 18Week 26
Risedronate32.3824.4821.1419.91
Teriparatide26.4520.1317.7516.69

[back to top]

Change in Lumbar Spine Areal Bone Mineral Density (BMD)

Least squares (LS) means obtained from mixed model repeated measures analysis including as fixed effects treatment and time with interaction, further adjusted for baseline lumbar spine BMD, type of hip fracture (31-A1/31-A2) and glucocorticoids used at baseline (Yes/No). (NCT00887354)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 78

Interventiongram per square centimeter (g/cm^2) (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide0.094
Risedronate0.055

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline at Month 6 in BMD of the Femoral Neck

"Bone mineral density was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Images were analyzed by a central imaging reader.~Percent change from baseline to month 6 was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with the percent change from baseline to month 6 in DXA BMD as dependent variable, and baseline BMD value, machine type, geographic region, interaction of baseline BMD and machine type, visit, treatment (categorical) and interaction of treatment and visit as the independent variables." (NCT00896532)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 months

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.4
Alendronate0.5
Teriparatide0.5
Romosozumab 70 mg QM0.2
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M0.4
Romosozumab 140 mg QM2.1
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M0.9
Romosozumab 210 mg QM1.9

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline at Month 6 in BMD at the Lumbar Spine

"Bone mineral density was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Images were analyzed by a central imaging reader.~Percent change from baseline to month 6 was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with the percent change from baseline to month 6 in DXA BMD as dependent variable, and baseline BMD value, machine type, geographic region, interaction of baseline BMD and machine type, visit, treatment (categorical) and interaction of treatment and visit as the independent variables." (NCT00896532)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 months

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.3
Alendronate2.6
Teriparatide4.8
Romosozumab 70 mg QM4.1
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M4.2
Romosozumab 140 mg QM7.1
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M4.4
Romosozumab 210 mg QM8.2

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12 in BMD of the Total Hip

"Bone mineral density was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Images were analyzed by a central imaging reader.~Percent change from baseline to 12 months in BMD was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with the percent change from baseline to month 12 in DXA BMD as dependent variable, and baseline BMD value, machine type, geographic region, interaction of baseline BMD and machine type, visit, treatment (categorical) and interaction of treatment and visit as the independent variables." (NCT00896532)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.7
Alendronate1.9
Teriparatide1.3
Romosozumab 70 mg QM1.3
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M1.3
Romosozumab 140 mg QM3.4
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M1.9
Romosozumab 210 mg QM4.1

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12 in BMD of the Femoral Neck

"Bone mineral density was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Images were analyzed by a central imaging reader.~Percent change from baseline to 12 months in BMD was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with the percent change from baseline to month 12 in DXA BMD as dependent variable, and baseline BMD value, machine type, geographic region, interaction of baseline BMD and machine type, visit, treatment (categorical) and interaction of treatment and visit as the independent variables." (NCT00896532)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.1
Alendronate1.2
Teriparatide1.1
Romosozumab 70 mg QM0.6
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M1.8
Romosozumab 140 mg QM4.2
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M1.4
Romosozumab 210 mg QM3.7

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12 in BMD of the Distal Radius

"Bone mineral density was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Images were analyzed by a central imaging reader.~Percent change from baseline in distal radius BMD was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with the percent change from baseline to Month 12 in DXA BMD as dependent variable, baseline BMD value, machine type, interaction of baseline BMD and machine type, treatment (categorical) and geographic region as the independent class variables." (NCT00896532)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.9
Alendronate-0.3
Teriparatide-1.7
Romosozumab 70 mg QM-1.8
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M-1.1
Romosozumab 140 mg QM-1.0
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M-0.4
Romosozumab 210 mg QM-1.2

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12 in BMD at the Lumbar Spine

Bone mineral density was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Images were analyzed by a central imaging reader. (NCT00896532)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.1
Alendronate4.1
Teriparatide7.1
Romosozumab 70 mg QM5.4
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M5.4
Romosozumab 140 mg QM9.1
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M5.5
Romosozumab 210 mg QM11.3
Romosozumab Monthly8.6
Romosozumab Every 3 Months5.5
Romosozumab 140 mg7.3
Romosozumab 210 mg8.4

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Procollagen Type 1 N-telopeptide (P1NP)

Percent change from baseline in the bone turnover marker (BTM) P1NP was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with the natural logarithm of the ratio of BTM (follow-up versus baseline) as the dependent variables, and visit, treatment (categorical), interaction of treatment and visit and the natural logarithm of the baseline BTM as the independent variables; outcomes were then transformed back to percent change from baseline. (NCT00896532)
Timeframe: Baseline and months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12

,,,,,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Month 1Month 3Month 6Month 9Month 12
Placebo-0.7-5.4-5.9-10.6-8.7
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M61.4-15.5-22.8-23.8-23.3
Romosozumab 140 mg QM55.03.8-18.6-26.1-31.2
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M75.8-19.5-25.5-30.1-29.7
Romosozumab 210 mg QM92.225.66.9-5.8-17.2
Romosozumab 70 mg QM24.2-9.1-20.0-26.9-23.0

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline at Month 6 in BMD of the Total Hip

"Bone mineral density was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Images were analyzed by a central imaging reader.~Percent change from baseline to month 6 was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with the percent change from baseline to month 6 in DXA BMD as dependent variable, and baseline BMD value, machine type, geographic region, interaction of baseline BMD and machine type, visit, treatment (categorical) and interaction of treatment and visit as the independent variables." (NCT00896532)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 months

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.6
Alendronate0.9
Teriparatide0.5
Romosozumab 70 mg QM0.5
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M0.9
Romosozumab 140 mg QM2.2
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M1.1
Romosozumab 210 mg QM2.9

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Procollagen Type 1 N-telopeptide (P1NP)

Percent change from baseline in the bone turnover marker (BTM) P1NP was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with the natural logarithm of the ratio of BTM (follow-up versus baseline) as the dependent variables, and visit, treatment (categorical), interaction of treatment and visit and the natural logarithm of the baseline BTM as the independent variables; outcomes were then transformed back to percent change from baseline. (NCT00896532)
Timeframe: Baseline and months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12

,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Month 3Month 6Month 9Month 12
Alendronate-50.8-57.0-60.8-60.8
Teriparatide97.1138.0116.898.3

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Osteocalcin

Percent change from baseline in the bone turnover marker (BTM) osteocalcin was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with the natural logarithm of the ratio of BTM (follow-up versus baseline) as the dependent variables, and visit, treatment (categorical), interaction of treatment and visit and the natural logarithm of the baseline BTM as the independent variables; outcomes were then transformed back to percent change from baseline. (NCT00896532)
Timeframe: Baseline and months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12

,,,,,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Month 1Month 3Month 6Month 9Month 12
Placebo-1.64.1-7.1-6.0-14.1
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M60.1-5.6-16.5-29.0-24.7
Romosozumab 140 mg QM53.115.6-7.4-27.7-31.1
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M77.9-3.7-23.2-30.7-26.2
Romosozumab 210 mg QM78.641.610.0-4.0-12.5
Romosozumab 70 mg QM28.1-0.3-11.8-26.9-27.3

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Type 1 Collagen C-telopeptide (CTX)

Percent change from baseline in the bone turnover marker (BTM) CTX was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with the natural logarithm of the ratio of BTM (follow-up versus baseline) as the dependent variables, and visit, treatment (categorical), interaction of treatment and visit and the natural logarithm of the baseline BTM as the independent variables; outcomes were then transformed back to percent change from baseline. (NCT00896532)
Timeframe: Baseline and months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12

,,,,,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Month 1Month 3Month 6Month 9Month 12
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M-19.2-6.2-8.41.312.2
Romosozumab 140 mg QM-35.4-26.5-24.6-27.7-33.0
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M-33.0-12.6-10.5-11.7-6.6
Romosozumab 210 mg QM-28.5-3.7-8.7-17.2-22.5
Romosozumab 70 mg QM-22.1-21.5-18.1-15.1-20.3
Placebo-3.9-2.42.71.09.8

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Type 1 Collagen C-telopeptide (CTX)

Percent change from baseline in the bone turnover marker (BTM) CTX was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with the natural logarithm of the ratio of BTM (follow-up versus baseline) as the dependent variables, and visit, treatment (categorical), interaction of treatment and visit and the natural logarithm of the baseline BTM as the independent variables; outcomes were then transformed back to percent change from baseline. (NCT00896532)
Timeframe: Baseline and months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12

,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Month 3Month 6Month 9Month 12
Alendronate-65.0-64.2-64.4-66.7
Teriparatide69.493.581.377.0

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Osteocalcin

Percent change from baseline in the bone turnover marker (BTM) osteocalcin was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with the natural logarithm of the ratio of BTM (follow-up versus baseline) as the dependent variables, and visit, treatment (categorical), interaction of treatment and visit and the natural logarithm of the baseline BTM as the independent variables; outcomes were then transformed back to percent change from baseline. (NCT00896532)
Timeframe: Baseline and months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12

,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Month 3Month 6Month 9Month 12
Alendronate-28.7-40.6-50.9-50.3
Teriparatide104.7106.799.991.6

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP)

Percent change from baseline in the bone turnover marker (BTM) BSAP was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with the natural logarithm of the ratio of BTM (follow-up versus baseline) as the dependent variables, and visit, treatment (categorical), interaction of treatment and visit and the natural logarithm of the baseline BTM as the independent variables; outcomes were then transformed back to percent change from baseline. (NCT00896532)
Timeframe: Baseline and months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12

,,,,,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Month 1Month 3Month 6Month 9Month 12
Placebo-1.1-7.6-4.13.59.2
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M35.1-18.0-18.2-12.5-10.8
Romosozumab 140 mg QM29.31.3-6.6-5.5-5.0
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M47.5-17.3-20.0-17.7-12.4
Romosozumab 210 mg QM60.927.413.110.49.2
Romosozumab 70 mg QM11.7-8.5-8.7-4.9-2.6

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP)

Percent change from baseline in the bone turnover marker (BTM) BSAP was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with the natural logarithm of the ratio of BTM (follow-up versus baseline) as the dependent variables, and visit, treatment (categorical), interaction of treatment and visit and the natural logarithm of the baseline BTM as the independent variables; outcomes were then transformed back to percent change from baseline. (NCT00896532)
Timeframe: Baseline and months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12

,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Month 3Month 6Month 9Month 12
Alendronate-30.5-35.4-32.5-31.2
Teriparatide21.829.841.845.7

[back to top]

Change in Spine Bone Density From Baseline to 2 Years

(NCT00926380)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 years

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Denosumab ONLY8.3
Teriparatide (Forteo®) ONLY9.5
Denosumab and Teriparatide (Forteo®)12.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Eroded Surface/Bone Surface (ES/BS) in the Endocortical Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 and 24 Months

Eroded surface/bone surface (ES/BS) in the endocortical compartment is the fraction of the entire trabecular surface occupied by resorption bays, including both those with and without osteoclasts. It is an indicator of bone resorption. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 and 24 months

,
Interventionpercentage of surface (Median)
6 months (n=23, 29)24 months (n=9, 8)
Teriparatide4.063.43
Zoledronic Acid1.871.88

[back to top]

Percentage of Osteoid Surface (OS)/Bone Surface (BS) in the Endocortical Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 and 24 Months

Osteoid surface (OS) in the endocortical compartment is the fraction (%) of the entire trabecular bone surface that is covered by osteoid. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 and 24 months

,
Interventionpercentage of surface (Median)
6 months (n=23, 29)24 months (n=9, 8)
Teriparatide16.337.48
Zoledronic Acid1.871.55

[back to top]

Total Formation Period (Tt.FP) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months

Tt.FP in CC is a measure of bone formation and is calculated as wall thickness divided by Aj.AR. Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. SL cases were imputed to a value of 0.3 µm/day or counted as missing. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 24 months

,
Interventionyear (Median)
DL and NL (n=9, 2)DL, Imputed SL (ISL) and NL (n=10, 5)
Teriparatide0.600.68
Zoledronic Acid0.512.62

[back to top]

Total Formation Period (Tt.FP) in the Endocortical Compartment (EC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 and 24 Months

Tt.FP in EC is a measure of bone formation and is calculated as wall thickness divided by Aj.AR. Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. SL cases were imputed to a value of 0.3 µm/day or counted as missing. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 and 24 months

,
Interventionyear (Median)
DL and NL at 6 Months (n=23, 6)DL, Imputed SL (ISL) and NL at 6 Months (n=23, 15)DL and NL at 24 Months (n=8, 2)DL, ISL and NL at 24 Months (n=9, 3)
Teriparatide0.240.240.270.31
Zoledronic Acid0.430.540.620.86

[back to top]

Wall Thickness (WTh.) in the Endocortical Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 and 24 Months

Wall thickness (WTh.) in the endocortical compartment is measured as the mean distance from the cement line to the marrow space of completed trabecular bone packets. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 and 24 months

,
Interventionmicrometer (µm) (Median)
6 months (n=23, 29)24 months (n=9, 8)
Teriparatide36.3034.00
Zoledronic Acid32.3932.45

[back to top]

Total Formation Period (Tt.FP) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months

Tt.FP in CC is a measure of bone formation and is calculated as wall thickness divided by Aj.AR. Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. SL cases were imputed to a value of 0.3 µm/day or counted as missing. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
Interventionyear (Median)
DL and NL (n=28, 16)DL, ISL and NL (n=28, 18)
Teriparatide0.240.24
Zoledronic Acid1.461.46

[back to top]

Average Length of Tetracycline Double Labels in the Cancellous Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months

The length of tetracycline double labels is a measure of the extent of bone formation in the cancellous compartment within individual remodeling units and is measured in millimeters (mm). Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionmillimeter (mm) (Median)
Teriparatide0.23
Zoledronic Acid0.29

[back to top]

Average Length of Tetracycline Double Labels in the Cancellous Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months

The length of tetracycline double labels is a measure of the extent of bone formation in the cancellous compartment within individual remodeling units and is measured in millimeters (mm). Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionmillimeter (mm) (Median)
Teriparatide0.35
Zoledronic Acid0.24

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Carboxyterminal Cross-Linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTX) at Month 12 Endpoint

CTX is a measure of bone resorption. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 months

Interventionnanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) (Median)
Teriparatide0.42
Zoledronic Acid-0.23

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Osteocalcin (OC) at Month 12 Endpoint

OC is a measure of osteoblast function. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 months

Interventionmicrogram/liter (µg/L) (Median)
Teriparatide32.98
Zoledronic Acid-12.32

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Procollagen Type I N-Terminal Propeptide (PINP) at Month 12 Endpoint

PINP is a measure of bone formation. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 months

Interventionmicrogram/liter (µg/L) (Median)
Teriparatide93.50
Zoledronic Acid-33.00

[back to top]

Mineralizing Surface/Bone Surface (MS/BS) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months

MS/BS in CC is a measure of the proportion of BS on which new mineralized bone is deposited at the time of tetracycline (T) labeling and is calculated as sum of total extent of double label (DL) plus half the extent of single label (SL) divided by BS. Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in the biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under a microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or no label (NL) suggests suppression of bone formation. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionpercentage of surface (Median)
Teriparatide3.00
Zoledronic Acid0.07

[back to top]

Mineralizing Surface/Bone Surface (MS/BS) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months

MS/BS in CC is a measure of the proportion of BS on which new mineralized bone is deposited at the time of tetracycline (T) labeling and is calculated as sum of total extent of double label (DL) plus half the extent of single label (SL) divided by BS. Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in the biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under a microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or no label (NL) suggests suppression of bone formation. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of surface (Median)
Teriparatide5.60
Zoledronic Acid0.16

[back to top]

Osteoid Thickness (OTh.) in the Cancellous Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months

Osteoid thickness (OTh.) in the cancellous compartment is a measure of the average thickness of osteoid seams. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionmicrometer (µm) (Median)
Teriparatide5.71
Zoledronic Acid3.98

[back to top]

Osteoid Thickness (OTh.) in the Cancellous Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months

Osteoid thickness (OTh.) in the cancellous compartment is a measure of the average thickness of osteoid seams. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionmicrometer (µm) (Median)
Teriparatide4.92
Zoledronic Acid3.77

[back to top]

Percentage of Eroded Surface/Bone Surface (ES/BS) in the Cancellous Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months

Eroded surface/bone surface (ES/BS) in the cancellous compartment is the fraction of the entire trabecular surface occupied by resorption bays, including both those with and without osteoclasts. It is an indicator of bone resorption. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionpercentage of surface (Median)
Teriparatide4.44
Zoledronic Acid2.39

[back to top]

Percentage of Eroded Surface/Bone Surface (ES/BS) in the Cancellous Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months

Eroded surface/bone surface (ES/BS) in the cancellous compartment is the fraction of the entire trabecular surface occupied by resorption bays, including both those with and without osteoclasts. It is an indicator of bone resorption. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of surface (Median)
Teriparatide4.59
Zoledronic Acid2.71

[back to top]

Percentage of Osteoid Surface (OS)/Bone Surface (BS) in the Cancellous Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months

Osteoid surface (OS) in the cancellous compartment is the fraction (%) of the entire trabecular bone surface that is covered by osteoid. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionpercentage of surface (Median)
Teriparatide11.19
Zoledronic Acid1.26

[back to top]

Percentage of Osteoid Surface (OS)/Bone Surface (BS) in the Cancellous Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months

Osteoid surface (OS) in the cancellous compartment is the fraction (%) of the entire trabecular bone surface that is covered by osteoid. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of surface (Median)
Teriparatide11.34
Zoledronic Acid2.51

[back to top]

Percentage of Osteoid Volume (OV)/Bone Volume (BV) in the Cancellous Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months

Osteoid volume (OV) in the cancellous compartment is the percent of a given volume of bone tissue that consists of unmineralized bone (osteoid). (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionpercentage of volume (Median)
Teriparatide1.33
Zoledronic Acid0.18

[back to top]

Percentage of Osteoid Volume (OV)/Bone Volume (BV) in the Cancellous Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months

Osteoid volume (OV) in the cancellous compartment is the percent of a given volume of bone tissue that consists of unmineralized bone (osteoid). (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of volume (Median)
Teriparatide1.32
Zoledronic Acid0.24

[back to top]

Wall Thickness (WTh.) in the Cancellous Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months

Wall thickness (WTh.) in the cancellous compartment is measured as the mean distance from the cement line to the marrow space of completed trabecular bone packets. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionmicrometer (µm) (Median)
Teriparatide31.37
Zoledronic Acid29.26

[back to top]

Wall Thickness (WTh.) in the Cancellous Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months

Wall thickness (WTh.) in the cancellous compartment is measured as the mean distance from the cement line to the marrow space of completed trabecular bone packets. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionµm (Median)
Teriparatide31.29
Zoledronic Acid28.63

[back to top]

Activation Frequency (Ac.f) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months

Ac.f in CC represents the frequency of activation of new remodeling cycles on the bone surface (BFR/BS divided by wall thickness) and is expressed in units of new cycles per unit of time. Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. SL cases were imputed to a value of 0.3 µm/day or counted as missing. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 24 months

,
Interventionnew cycles/year (Median)
DL and NL (n=9, 6)DL, Imputed SL (ISL) and NL (n=10, 9)
Teriparatide0.190.18
Zoledronic Acid0.000.00

[back to top]

Activation Frequency (Ac.f) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months

Ac.f in CC represents the frequency of activation of new remodeling cycles on BS (bone formation rate [BFR]/BS divided by wall thickness) and is expressed in units of new cycles per unit of time. Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. SL cases were imputed to a value of 0.3 micrometer (µm)/day or counted as missing. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
Interventionnew cycles/year (Median)
DL and NL (n=28, 28)DL, Imputed SL (ISL) and NL (n=28, 30)
Teriparatide0.370.37
Zoledronic Acid0.010.01

[back to top]

Activation Frequency (Ac.f) in the Endocortical Compartment (EC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 and 24 Months

Ac.f in EC represents the frequency of activation of new remodeling cycles on the bone surface (BFR/BS divided by wall thickness) and is expressed in units of new cycles per unit of time. Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. SL cases were imputed to a value of 0.3 µm/day or counted as missing. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 and 24 months

,
Interventionnew cycles/year (Median)
DL and NL at 6 Months (n=23, 20)DL, Imputed SL (ISL) and NL at 6 Months (n=23, 29)DL and NL at 24 Months (n=8, 7)DL, ISL and NL at 24 Months (n=9, 8)
Teriparatide0.830.830.250.24
Zoledronic Acid0.000.010.000.00

[back to top]

Active Formation Period (a.FP) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months

a. FP in CC is the mean time required to rebuild a new bone structural unit, calculated as wall thickness divided by MAR. Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. SL cases were imputed to a value of 0.3 µm/day or counted as missing. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 24 months

,
Interventionyear (Median)
DL and NL (n=9, 2)DL, Imputed SL (ISL) and NL (n=10, 5)
Teriparatide0.190.19
Zoledronic Acid0.190.25

[back to top]

Active Formation Period (a.FP) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months

a. FP in CC is the mean time required to rebuild a new bone structural unit, calculated as wall thickness divided by MAR. Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. SL cases were imputed to a value of 0.3 µm/day or counted as missing. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
Interventionyear (Median)
DL and NL (n=28, 16)DL, ISL and NL (n=28, 18)
Teriparatide0.150.15
Zoledronic Acid0.160.16

[back to top]

Active Formation Period (a.FP) in the Endocortical Compartment (EC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 and 24 Months

a. FP in EC is the mean time required to rebuild a new bone structural unit, calculated as wall thickness divided by MAR. Participants were given T for two 3 day-periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. SL cases were imputed to a value of 0.3 µm/day or counted as missing. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 and 24 months

,
Interventionyear (Median)
DL and NL at 6 Months (n=23, 6)DL, Imputed SL (ISL) and NL at 6 Months (n=23, 15)DL and NL at 24 Months (n=8, 2)DL, ISL and NL at 24 Months (n=9, 3)
Teriparatide0.200.200.230.24
Zoledronic Acid0.200.280.220.25

[back to top]

Adjusted Apposition Rate (Aj.AR) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months

Aj.AR in CC is MAR averaged over the entire osteoid surface and in a steady state is an estimate of the mean rate of matrix apposition. Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. SL cases were imputed to a value of 0.3 µm/day or counted as missing. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 24 months

,
Interventionmicrometer (µm)/day (Median)
DL and NL (n=9, 6)DL, Imputed SL (ISL) and NL (n=10, 9)
Teriparatide0.130.12
Zoledronic Acid0.000.02

[back to top]

Adjusted Apposition Rate (Aj.AR) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months

Aj.AR in CC is MAR averaged over the entire osteoid surface and in a steady state is an estimate of the mean rate of matrix apposition. Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. SL cases were imputed to a value of 0.3 µm/day or counted as missing. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
Interventionµm/day (Median)
DL and NL (n=28, 28)DL, ISL and NL (n=28, 30)
Teriparatide0.340.34
Zoledronic Acid0.020.02

[back to top]

Adjusted Apposition Rate (Aj.AR) in the Endocortical Compartment (EC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 and 24 Months

Aj.AR in EC is MAR averaged over the entire osteoid surface and in a steady state is an estimate of the mean rate of matrix apposition. Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. SL cases were imputed to a value of 0.3 µm/day or counted as missing. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 and 24 months

,
Interventionmicrometer (µm)/day (Median)
DL and NL at 6 Months (n=23, 20)DL, Imputed SL (ISL) and NL at 6 Months (n=23, 29)DL and NL at 24 Months (n=8, 7)DL, ISL and NL at 24 Months (n=9, 8)
Teriparatide0.410.410.350.32
Zoledronic Acid0.000.030.000.00

[back to top]

Average Length of Tetracycline Double Labels in the Endocortical Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 and 24 Months

The length of tetracycline double labels is a measure of the extent of bone formation in the endocortical compartment within individual remodeling units and is measured in millimeters (mm). Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 and 24 months

,
Interventionmillimeter (mm) (Median)
6 months (n=23, 6)24 months (n=8, 2)
Teriparatide0.340.27
Zoledronic Acid0.300.30

[back to top]

Bone Formation Rate (BFR) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months

BFR in CC is the volume of mineralized bone formed per unit surface bone per unit time (mm³/mm²/year); calculated as MAR times MS/BS. Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. SL cases were imputed to a value of 0.3 µm/day or counted as missing. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 24 months

,
Interventionmm³/mm²/year (Median)
DL and NL (n=9, 6)DL, Imputed SL (ISL) and NL (n=10, 9)
Teriparatide0.00570.0057
Zoledronic Acid0.00000.0001

[back to top]

Bone Formation Rate (BFR) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months

BFR in CC is the volume of mineralized bone formed per unit surface bone per unit time (cubic millimeter/square millimeter/year [mm³/mm²/year]); calculated as mineral apposition rate (MAR) times MS/BS. Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. SL cases were imputed to a value of 0.3 µm/day or counted as missing. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
Interventionmm³/mm²/year (Median)
DL and NL (n=28, 28)DL, ISL and NL (n=28, 30)
Teriparatide0.01160.0116
Zoledronic Acid0.00020.0002

[back to top]

Bone Formation Rate (BFR) in the Endocortical Compartment (EC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 and 24 Months

BFR in EC is the volume of mineralized bone formed per unit surface bone per unit time (mm³/mm²/year); calculated as MAR times MS/BS. Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. SL cases were imputed to a value of 0.3 µm/day or counted as missing. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 and 24 months

,
Interventionmm³/mm²/year (Median)
DL and NL at 6 Months (n=23, 20)DL, Imputed SL (ISL) and NL at 6 Months (n=23, 29)DL and NL at 24 Months (n=8, 7)DL, ISL and NL at 24 Months (n=9, 8)
Teriparatide0.03070.03070.00930.0090
Zoledronic Acid0.00000.00030.00000.0000

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Carboxyterminal Cross-Linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTX) at Month 1, 3 and 6 Endpoint

CTX is a measure of bone resorption. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1, 3, 6 months

,
Interventionnanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) (Median)
Change at 1 month (n= 32, 31)Change at 3 months (n= 32, 29)Change at 6 months (n= 25, 28)
Teriparatide0.060.260.31
Zoledronic Acid-0.37-0.35-0.32

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Osteocalcin (OC) at Month 1, 3, and 6 Endpoint

OC is a measure of osteoblast function. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1, 3, 6 months

,
Interventionµg/L (Median)
Change at 1 month (n= 32, 32)Change at 3 months (n=32, 30)Change at 6 months (n= 25, 29)
Teriparatide22.3529.9330.85
Zoledronic Acid-3.39-12.30-14.06

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Procollagen Type I N-Terminal Propeptide (PINP) at Month 1, 3 and 6 Endpoint

PINP is a measure of bone formation. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1, 3, 6 months

,
Interventionmicrogram/Liter (µg/L) (Median)
Change at 1 month (n= 32, 31)Change at 3 months (n= 32, 29)Change at 6 months (n= 25, 28)
Teriparatide65.5066.0084.00
Zoledronic Acid-15.00-39.00-37.50

[back to top]

Mineral Apposition Rate (MAR) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months

MAR in CC is a measure of the linear rate of production of mineralized bone matrix by osteoblasts and is measured by the mean distance between two consecutive labels divided by the time interval. Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. SL cases were imputed to a value of 0.3 µm/day or counted as missing. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 24 months

,
Interventionmicrometer (µm)/day (Median)
DL and NL (n=9, 6)DL, Imputed SL (ISL) and NL (n=10, 9)
Teriparatide0.440.43
Zoledronic Acid0.000.30

[back to top]

Mineral Apposition Rate (MAR) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months

MAR in CC is a measure of the linear rate of production of mineralized bone matrix by osteoblasts and is measured by the mean distance between two consecutive T labels divided by the time interval. Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. SL cases were imputed to a value of 0.3 µm/day or counted as missing. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
Interventionmicrometer (µm)/day (Median)
DL and NL (n=28, 28)DL, ISL and NL (n=28, 30)
Teriparatide0.560.56
Zoledronic Acid0.350.33

[back to top]

Mineral Apposition Rate (MAR) in the Endocortical Compartment (EC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 and 24 Months

MAR in EC is a measure of the linear rate of production of mineralized bone matrix by osteoblasts and is measured by the mean distance between two consecutive labels divided by the time interval. Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. SL cases were imputed to a value of 0.3 µm/day or counted as missing. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 and 24 months

,
Interventionmicrometer (µm/day) (Median)
DL and NL at 6 Months (n=23, 20)DL, Imputed SL (ISL) and NL at 6 Months (n=23, 29)DL and NL at 24 Months (n=8, 7)DL, ISL and NL at 24 Months (n=9, 8)
Teriparatide0.500.500.430.42
Zoledronic Acid0.000.300.000.00

[back to top]

Mineralization Lag Time (Mlt) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months

Mlt in CC is the period between deposition and subsequent mineralization of osteoid. Mlt is calculated as O.Th divided by Aj.AR. Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. SL cases were imputed to a value of 0.3 µm/day or counted as missing. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 24 months

,
Interventionday (Median)
DL and NL (n=9, 2)DL, Imputed SL (ISL) and NL (n=10, 5)
Teriparatide38.8445.33
Zoledronic Acid45.67128.37

[back to top]

Mineralization Lag Time (Mlt) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months

Mlt in CC is the period between deposition and subsequent mineralization of osteoid. Mlt is calculated as Osteoid Thickness (O.Th) divided by Aj.AR. Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. SL cases were imputed to a value of 0.3 µm/day or counted as missing. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
Interventionday (Median)
DL and NL (n=28, 16)DL, ISL and NL (n=28, 18)
Teriparatide13.6313.63
Zoledronic Acid75.7275.72

[back to top]

Mineralization Lag Time (Mlt) in the Endocortical Compartment (EC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 and 24 Months

Mlt in EC is the period between deposition and subsequent mineralization of osteoid. Mlt is calculated as O.Th divided by Aj.AR. Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. SL cases were imputed to a value of 0.3 µm/day or counted as missing. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 and 24 months

,
Interventionday (Median)
DL and NL at 6 Months (n=23, 6)DL, Imputed SL (ISL) and NL at 6 Months (n=23, 15)DL and NL at 24 Months (n=8, 2)DL, ISL and NL at 24 Months (n=9, 3)
Teriparatide12.6312.6315.6717.04
Zoledronic Acid26.9726.7042.8629.03

[back to top]

Mineralizing Surface/Bone Surface(MS/BS) in the Endocortical Compartment (EC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 and 24 Months

MS/BS in EC is a measure of the proportion of BS on which new mineralized bone is deposited at the time of tetracycline (T) labeling and is calculated as sum of total extent of double label (DL) plus half the extent of single label (SL) divided by BS. Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in the biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under a microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or no label (NL) suggests suppression of bone formation. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 and 24 months

,
Interventionpercentage of surface (Median)
6 months (n=23, 29)24 months (n=9, 8)
Teriparatide18.645.82
Zoledronic Acid0.300.00

[back to top]

Number of Samples With Single or Double Tetracycline Labels, Single and Double Labels, or No Tetracycline Labels in the Cancellous Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months

Number of samples with single or double tetracycline labels, both single and double labels, or no labels in the cancellous compartment were compared between teriparatide and zoledronic acid treated participants. Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 24 months

,
Interventionsamples (Number)
No LabelSingle Label OnlyDouble Label OnlySingle and Double Label
Teriparatide0109
Zoledronic Acid4302

[back to top]

Number of Samples With Single or Double Tetracycline Labels, Single and Double Labels, or No Tetracycline Labels in the Cancellous Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months

Number of samples with single or double tetracycline labels, both single and double labels, or no labels in the cancellous compartment were compared between teriparatide and zoledronic acid treated participants. Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
Interventionsamples (Number)
No LabelSingle Label OnlyDouble Label OnlySingle and Double Label
Teriparatide00028
Zoledronic Acid122313

[back to top]

Number of Samples With Single or Double Tetracycline Labels, Single and Double Labels, or No Tetracycline Labels in the Endocortical Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 and 24 Months

Number of samples with single or double tetracycline labels, both single and double labels, or no labels in the endocortical compartment were compared between teriparatide and zoledronic acid treated participants. Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 and 24 months

,
Interventionsamples (Number)
No Label at 6 months (n=23, 29)Single Label Only at 6 months (n=23, 29)Double Label Only at 6 months (n=23, 29)Single and Double Label at 6 months (n=23, 29)No Label at 24 months (n=9, 8)Single Label Only at 24 months (n=9, 8)Double Label Only at 24 months (n=9, 8)Single and Double Label at 24 months (n=9, 8)
Teriparatide000230108
Zoledronic Acid149065102

[back to top]

Osteoid Maturation Time (Omt) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months

Omt in CC is the period between the onset of deposition and onset of mineralization of a given amount of osteoid. Omt is calculated as O.Th divided by MAR. Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. SL cases were imputed to a value of 0.3 µm/day or counted as missing. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 24 months

,
Interventionday (Median)
DL and NL (n=9, 2)DL, Imputed SL (ISL) and NL (n=10, 5)
Teriparatide13.4213.52
Zoledronic Acid17.3813.92

[back to top]

Osteoid Maturation Time (Omt) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months

Omt in CC is the period between the onset of deposition and onset of mineralization of a given amount of osteoid. Omt is calculated as O.Th divided by MAR. Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. SL cases were imputed to a value of 0.3 µm/day or counted as missing. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
Interventionday (Median)
DL and NL (n=28, 16)DL, ISL and NL (n=28, 18)
Teriparatide9.999.99
Zoledronic Acid9.059.05

[back to top]

Osteoid Maturation Time (Omt) in the Endocortical Compartment (EC) of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 and 24 Months

Omt in EC is the period between the onset of deposition and onset of mineralization of a given amount of osteoid. Omt is calculated as O.Th divided by MAR. Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. SL cases were imputed to a value of 0.3 µm/day or counted as missing. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 and 24 Months

,
Interventionday (Median)
DL and NL at 6 Months (n=23, 6)DL, Imputed SL (ISL) and NL at 6 Months (n=23, 15)DL and NL at 24 Months (n=8, 2)DL, ISL and NL at 24 Months (n=9, 3)
Teriparatide10.5710.5712.3013.03
Zoledronic Acid11.2711.3414.9412.12

[back to top]

Osteoid Thickness (OTh.) in the Endocortical Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 and 24 Months

Osteoid thickness (OTh.) in the endocortical compartment is a measure of the average thickness of osteoid seams. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 and 24 months

,
Interventionmicrometer (µm) (Median)
6 months (n=23, 29)24 months (n=9, 8)
Teriparatide4.945.23
Zoledronic Acid3.703.53

[back to top]

Percent of Single or Double Tetracycline Labels Per Bone Surface (sLS/BS), (dLS/BS) in the Cancellous Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 24 Months

The percent of single or double tetracycline labels per bone surface (sLS/BS, dLS/BS) in the cancellous compartment. Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 24 months

,
Interventionpercentage of tetracycline labels (Median)
sLS/BSdLS/BS
Teriparatide2.251.69
Zoledronic Acid0.150.00

[back to top]

Percent of Single or Double Tetracycline Labels Per Bone Surface (sLS/BS), (dLS/BS) in the Cancellous Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 Months

The percent of single or double tetracycline labels per bone surface (sLS/BS, dLS/BS) in the cancellous compartment. Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
Interventionpercentage of tetracycline labels (Median)
sLS/BSdLS/BS
Teriparatide3.194.13
Zoledronic Acid0.020.07

[back to top]

Percent of Single or Double Tetracycline Labels Per Bone Surface (sLS/BS), (dLS/BS) in the Endocortical Compartment of Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies at 6 and 24 Months

The percent of single or double tetracycline labels per bone surface (sLS/BS, dLS/BS) in the endocortical compartment. Participants were given T for two 3-day periods, 14 days apart. T fluoresces under certain light and temporarily binds to new bone. New bone in biopsy is seen as the amount of bone between 2 fluorescently T labeled lines under microscope. DL indicates active bone formation, SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. (NCT00927186)
Timeframe: 6 and 24 months

,
Interventionpercentage of tetracycline labels (Median)
sLS/BS at 6 months (n=23, 29)dLS/BS at 6 months (n=23, 29)sLS/BS at 24 months (n=9, 8)dLS/BS at 24 months (n=9, 8)
Teriparatide5.5613.463.752.77
Zoledronic Acid0.250.000.000.00

[back to top]

Time Course Change of BMD Response at the Lumbar Spine

To assess the time course of the treatment, the BMD data of the lumbar spine was assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and analyzed using a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) method, with the repeated measure occurring at each visit (for example, 6 and 12 month). BMD values are corrected data and have been standardized across the machine types (Hologic and Lunar). (NCT01011556)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 Months and 12 Months

,,,
Interventionpercentage change in BMD (Least Squares Mean)
6 months (n=54, 52, 51, 58)12 months (n=52, 48, 45, 50)
20 Mcg Subcutaneous Teriparatide4.728.12
30 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide0.190.62
50 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide0.780.66
80 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide1.191.93

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at 6 Months

Bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine was assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). BMD values are corrected data and have been standardized across the machine types (Hologic and Lunar). Analyses were performed using ANCOVA model with the baseline value as a covariate and pooled site and treatment as fixed effects. (NCT01011556)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 Months

Interventionpercentage change in BMD (Least Squares Mean)
20 Mcg Subcutaneous Teriparatide4.74
30 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide0.16
50 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide0.88
80 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide1.19

[back to top]

Change From Pre-dose to Postdose in Supine and Standing Heart Rate at Baseline (BL) and 12 Months (Mon).

(NCT01011556)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 30 minutes, 2 hours at Baseline and 12 Months

,,,
Interventionbeats per minute (bpm) (Mean)
BL, supine, 30 min (n=56,54,51,62)BL, supine, 2 h (n=56,56,53,63)BL, standing, 30 min (n=56,54,51,62)BL, standing, 2 h (n=56,56,53,64)12 mon, supine, 30 min (n=51,47,44,51)12 mon, supine, 2 h (n=51,47,44,51)12 mon, standing, 30 min (n=51,47,44,51)12 mon, standing, 2 h (n=51,47,44,51)
20 Mcg Subcutaneous Teriparatide1.81.51.61.02.51.61.20.9
30 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide1.70.9-1.0-0.81.41.10.00.1
50 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide-0.8-0.80.70.5-0.1-0.3-0.7-0.4
80 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide-0.6-0.4-1.2-1.0-0.2-0.8-0.4-0.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Urine Calcium Excretion at 6 and 12 Months

(NCT01011556)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 Months, 12 Months

,,,
Interventionmillimole/day (mmol/day) (Mean)
Baseline6 months (n=54, 50, 49, 56)12 months (n=51, 47, 41, 51)
20 Mcg Subcutaneous Teriparatide4.452.025.25
30 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide4.210.704.97
50 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide4.261.204.80
80 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide4.241.354.51

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) Specific Antibody Levels

Participants were tested for anti-recombinant teriparatide and anti-synthetic teriparatide titers. Either none were detected (ND) or antibodies were determined to be present if the teriparatide specific antibody titers were at least 1:8 (titer 1:8). (NCT01011556)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1, 3, 12, and 13 Months (mon)

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline: anti-recombinant ND (n=57, 54, 53, 64)Baseline:anti-recombinant titer 1:8(n=57,54,53,64)1 mon:anti-recombinant ND (n=54,54,51,62)1 mon:anti-recombinant titer 1:8 (n=54,54,51,623 mon:anti-recombinant ND (n=55,52,51,61)3 mon:anti-recombinant titer 1:8 (n=55,52,51,612 mon:anti-recombinant ND (n=52,48,45,51)12 mon:anti-recombinant titer 1:8 (n=52,48,45,51)13 mon:anti-recombinant ND (n=50,46,44,50)13 mon:anti-recombinant titer 1:8 (n=50,46,44,50)Baseline:anti-synthetic ND (n=57,54,53,64)Baseline:anti-synthetic titer 1:8 (n=57,54,53,64)1 mon:anti-synthetic ND (N=54,54,51,62)1 mon:anti-synthetic titer 1:8 (N=54,54,51,62)3 mon:anti-synthetic ND (n=55,52,51,61)3 mon:anti-synthetic titer 1:8 (n=55,52,51,61)12 mon:anti-synthetic ND (n=52,48,45,51)12 mon:anti-synthetic titer 18 (n=52,48,45,51)13 mon:anti-synthetic ND (n=50,46,44,50)13 mon:anti-synthetic titer 1:8 (n=50,46,44,50)
20 Mcg Subcutaneous Teriparatide570540550520500570540550520500
30 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide540540520480460540540520480460
50 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide521510501441431521501501441431
80 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide640620610510500640620610510500

[back to top]

Change From Pre-dose and Postdose Supine and Standing SBP and DBP at Baseline (BL) and 12 Months (Mon)

Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) measured at pre-dose and 30 minutes (min) and 2 hours (hr) post-dose in both the supine and standing position. (NCT01011556)
Timeframe: Pre-Dose, 30 minutes, 2 hours Post-Dose at Baseline and 12 Months

,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
BL, supine, SBP, 30 min (n=56,54,51,62)BL, supine, SBP, 2 h (n=56,56,53,63)BL, supine, DBP, 30 min (n=56,54,51,62)BL, supine, DBP, 2 h (n=56,56,53,63)12mon, supine, SBP, 30min (n=51,47,44,51)12mon, supine, SBP, 2 h (n=51,47,44,51)12mon, supine, DBP, 30min (n=52,48,45,51)12mon, supine, DBP, 2 h (n=51,47,44,51)BL, standing, SBP, 30 min (n=56,54,51,62)BL, standing, SBP, 2 h (n=56,56,53,64)BL, standing, DBP, 30 min (n=56,54,51,62)BL, standing, DBP, 2 h (n=56,56,53,64)12mon, standing, SBP, 30min(n=51,47,44,51)12mon, standing, SBP, 2 h (n=51,47,44,51)12mon, standing, DBP, 30 min(n=51,47,44,5112mon, standing, DBP, 2 h (n=51,47,44,51)
20 Mcg Subcutaneous Teriparatide-0.6-0.3-1.9-2.10.8-0.2-1.8-1.3-1.3-1.7-2.3-2.3-0.6-0.1-1.81.1
30 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide2.0-0.91.4-0.8-2.2-1.8-1.8-3.32.5-1.60.2-2.1-0.9-0.4-2.4-2.0
50 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide-1.0-3.5-2.5-3.6-1.1-2.5-2.1-1.3-0.6-3.8-1.2-1.10.5-1.3-3.5-1.9
80 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide-0.8-0.6-1.1-1.6-2.0-1.9-1.2-2.0-0.50.0-1.2-1.7-0.8-0.91.40.1

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Procollagen Type 1 C-Propeptide (P1CP) at 1 Month

Procollagen Type 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) is a marker of bone formation. (NCT01011556)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 Month

Interventionpercentage change in P1CP (Median)
20 Mcg Subcutaneous Teriparatide80.10
30 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide4.63
50 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide12.30
80 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide23.84

[back to top]

Change in Serum Calcium With and Without Adjustments for Serum Albumin From Predose to After 4 and 6 Hours

Serum calcium adjusted for serum albumin levels is calculated using the following formula: Total Calcium + [(40 - albumin) x 0.02]. Analysis for serum calcium and albumin adjusted serum calcium were collected at predose, 4 hours (h) post-dose (PD) and 6 h PD at baseline and 12 months (mon). (NCT01011556)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Months

,,,
Interventionmillimole/Liter (mmol/L) (Mean)
Baseline- predose; no adjustment (n=54,53,51,62)Baseline- 4 h PD; no adjustment (n=55,53,51,63)Baseline- 6 h PD; no adjustment (n=52,51,48,59)12 mon-predose; no adjustment (n=52,47,45,50)12 mon-4 h PD; no adjustment (n=51,46,44,51)12 mon-6 h PD; no adjustment (n=50,45,44,51)baseline-predose albumin adjusted (n=53,53,50,60)baseline-4 h PD; albumin adjusted (n=52,52,50,61)baseline-6 h PD; albumin adjusted (n=49,50,47,57)12 mon- predose albumin adjusted (n=52,47,45,50)12 mon- 4 h PD; albumin adjusted (n=51,46,44,51)12 mon-6 h PD; albumin adjusted (n=52,47,45,50)
20 Mcg Subcutaneous Teriparatide2.3912.4322.4402.4632.5162.5322.3632.4182.4232.4612.5232.547
30 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide2.3622.3582.3692.4272.4282.4262.3412.3482.3632.4322.4382.443
50 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide2.3892.4032.4002.4272.4302.4432.3762.4032.4042.4492.4582.481
80 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide2.3922.3932.3972.4322.4642.4672.3732.3862.3942.4422.4822.483

[back to top]

Convenience/Ease of Use Questionnaire (CEUQ)

CEUQ consists of 5 sections and 16 questions using a 5-point Likert scale designed to collect measures for ease of use (S1), convenience of use (S2), confidence of use (S3), fear of use (S4), and overall satisfaction with therapy (S5). CEUQ is not a validated instrument. (NCT01011556)
Timeframe: baseline up to 12 months

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
S1-Stronly DisagreeS1-Somewhat DisagreeS1-NeutralS1-Somewhat AgreeS1-Strongly AgreeS2-Strongly DisagreeS2-Somewhat DisagreeS2-NeutralS2-Somewhat AgreeS2-Strongly AgreeS3-Not ConfidentS3-Somewhat Not ConfidentS3-NeutralS3-Somewhat ConfidentS3-Very ConfidentS4-Extremely FearfulS4-Somewhat FearfulS4-NeutralS4-Somewhat Not FearfulS4-Not FearfulS5-Very DissatisfiedS5-Somewhat DissatisfiedS5-NeutralS5-Somewhat SatisfiedS5-Very Satisfied
20 Mcg Subcutaneous Teriparatide0001144001114300013420119440011044
30 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide0009450011241010153801016370101340
50 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide00184200194110311361019400121038
80 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide00010520001250014174001013480011843

[back to top]

DRAIZE Edema Assessment at Baseline Through 13 Month Follow-up

Severity of edema was categorized based on a 5 point scale: 0=no edema, 4=severe edema (defined as an area raised more than 1 millimeter and extending beyond area of exposure) (NCT01011556)
Timeframe: 13 Month follow-up

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
0=no edema1=very slight edema to 4=severe edema
20 Mcg Subcutaneous Teriparatide410
30 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide390
50 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide390
80 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide430

[back to top]

DRAIZE Erythema Assessment at Baseline Through 13 Month Follow-up

Severity of erythema was categorized based on a 5 point scale: 0=no erythema, 4=severe erythema (defined as beet red to eschar) (NCT01011556)
Timeframe: 13 Month follow-up

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
0=no erythema1=very slight erythema to 4=severe erythema
20 Mcg Subcutaneous Teriparatide410
30 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide390
50 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide390
80 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide430

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline of C-Terminal Telopeptide (CTX)

C-terminal telopeptide is a marker of bone resorption. (NCT01011556)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 Month, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months

,,,
Interventionpercentage change in CTX (Mean)
1 month (n=49, 53, 49, 60)3 months (n=50, 51, 49, 59)6 months (n=48, 49, 48, 56)12 months (n=47, 46, 43, 49)
20 Mcg Subcutaneous Teriparatide20.5787.78123.3697.52
30 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide8.0530.6637.3637.75
50 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide13.3542.4068.6361.25
80 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide21.6690.36127.81114.11

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Procollagen Type 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP)

Procollagen Type 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) is a marker of bone formation. (NCT01011556)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 Month, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months

,,,
Interventionpercentage change in P1NP (Mean)
1 month (n=49, 53, 49, 60)3 months (n=50, 51, 49, 59)6 months (n=48, 49, 48, 56)12 months (n=47, 46, 43, 49)
20 Mcg Subcutaneous Teriparatide112.47174.88284.89232.41
30 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide19.2935.6862.9972.17
50 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide27.7853.5393.8297.14
80 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide42.06116.34221.28178.02

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at 12 Months

Bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine was assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). BMD values are corrected data and have been standardized across the machine types (Hologic and Lunar). Analyses were performed using ANCOVA model and least square (LS) means were adjusted for baseline BMD values as a covariate and pooled site and treatment as fixed effects. (NCT01011556)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Months

Interventionpercentage change in BMD (Least Squares Mean)
20 Mcg Subcutaneous Teriparatide7.80
30 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide0.63
50 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide0.32
80 Mcg Transdermal Teriparatide1.63

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Bone Area at Month 24 Endpoint

Bone area is a defined region of interest of bone. (NCT01078805)
Timeframe: Baseline, up to month 24

Interventionpercent change of centimeter square (Mean)
Femoral NeckForearmInter-TrochanterL1-L4Total HipTrochanterWards Triangle
FORTEO (Teriparatide)-Treated2.2314.6801.8283.9072.6483.3951.826

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Content (BMC) at Month 24 Endpoint

BMC is an estimate of the amount of mineral (such as calcium) in the bone. (NCT01078805)
Timeframe: Baseline, up to month 24

Interventionpercentage (%) change of grams (g) (Mean)
Femoral NeckForearmInter-TrochanterL1-L4Total HipTrochanterWards Triangle
FORTEO (Teriparatide)-Treated4.1877.2435.71620.7748.3034.96850.996

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Month 24 Endpoint

A BMD test measures the amount of mineral (such as calcium) in a defined area of bone, grams per square centimeter (g/cm²). (NCT01078805)
Timeframe: Baseline, up to month 24

Interventionpercentage (%) change of BMD (Mean)
Femoral NeckForearmInter-TrochanterLumbar spine vertebrae numbered 1 through 4(L1-L4)Total HipTrochanterWards Triangle
FORTEO (Teriparatide)-Treated2.5690.6261.5326.4193.7662.6043.394

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Vertebral Fractures

Clinical vertebral fracture was defined as a fracture that caused pain and/or discomfort, came to medical attention, and was confirmed by the investigator. Vertebral fracture sites included thoracic vertebra number 4 (T4) through lumbar spine vertebra number 4 (L4). Vertebral fracture is binary outcome (Yes/No). Percentage of participants= number of participants with new vertebral fracture/ number of participants at risk * 100. (NCT01078805)
Timeframe: up to 24 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
0 to 6 months (n=3720)6 to 12 months (n=2996)12 to 18 months (n=2606)18 to 24 months (n=2266)
FORTEO (Teriparatide)-Treated0.670.400.350.35

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Non-Vertebral Fragility Fractures

Non-vertebral fragility fracture is defined as low trauma fracture, such as a fall from standing height. It is binary outcome (Yes/No). Percentage of participants = number of participants with new Non-Vertebral Fragility Fracture/ number of participants at risk * 100. (NCT01078805)
Timeframe: up to 24 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
0 to 6 months (n=3720)6 to 12 months (n=2970)12 to 18 months (n=2570)18 to 24 months (n=2225)
FORTEO (Teriparatide)-Treated1.420.910.700.81

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Back Pain Score by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 24 Month Endpoint

Visual analog pain scale is a measurement instrument to measure the level of pain. Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater pain. Mean percentage change is (Pain score at baseline visit - Pain score at Month 24)/Pain score at baseline visit*100%. (NCT01078805)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 24

Interventionpercentage change of pain score (Mean)
FORTEO (Teriparatide)-Treated-36.2

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Pain Score by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 24 Month Endpoint

Visual analog pain scale is a measurement instrument to measure the level of pain. Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater pain. Mean percentage change is (Pain score at baseline visit - Pain score at Month 24)/Pain score at baseline visit*100%. (NCT01078805)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 24

Interventionpercentage change of pain score (Mean)
FORTEO (Teriparatide)-Treated-24.9

[back to top]

Treatment Adherence

Treatment adherence is the duration of time participants were on Forteo therapy during the 24-month treatment phase of the study. (NCT01078805)
Timeframe: up to 24 months

Interventiondays (Mean)
0 to 6 months (n=701)6 to 12 months (n=382)12 to 18 months (n=338)18 to 24 months (n=2299)
FORTEO (Teriparatide)-Treated72.5272.5450.7743.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Change in Bone Volume Fraction (BVF)

Average fractional content of bone expressed in percent (NCT01153425)
Timeframe: Change between baseline and 12 months

InterventionPercentage of Change (Mean)
Teriparatide (Forteo)1.0
Zoledronic Acid (Reclast)0.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Change in Trabecular Surface-to-curve Ratio

Ratio of the volume densities of surface (S) and curve (C)-type voxels, S/C (NCT01153425)
Timeframe: Change between baseline and 12 months

InterventionPercentage of Change (Mean)
Teriparatide (Forteo)9.1
Zoledronic Acid (Reclast)7.1

[back to top] [back to top]

Average Bone Mineral Density of the Proximal Femur (Hip) at Baseline, 3 Months and 6 Months

Hip BMD was measured at the baseline, three month and six month visits. The outcome data is an overall average and range from all time points. (NCT01166958)
Timeframe: BMD measured at the baseline, 3 month, and 6 month visits.

Interventiong/cm2 (Mean)
Daily Teriparatide (Forteo)0.7951
Monthly Cycles of Teriparatide Followed by Raloxifene0.7898

[back to top]

Serum Markers of Skeletal Turnover (Serum P1NP)

Serum P1NP was measured at all study visits following the screening visit. The outcome data is an overall average and range from all time points. (NCT01166958)
Timeframe: These were measured at the baseline and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5 and 6 month visits.

Interventionmcg/L (Mean)
Daily Teriparatide (Forteo)128.7
Monthly Cycles of Teriparatide Followed by Raloxifene83.8

[back to top]

Average Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Baseline, 3 Months and 6 Months

Spine BMD was measured at the baseline, three month and six month visits. The outcome data is an overall average and range from all time points. (NCT01166958)
Timeframe: BMD measured at the baseline, 3 month, and 6 month visits.

Interventiong/cm2 (Mean)
Daily Teriparatide (Forteo)0.9599
Monthly Cycles of Teriparatide Followed by Raloxifene0.9006

[back to top]

Serum Markers of Skeletal Turnover (Serum CTX)

Serum CTX was measured at all study visits following the screening visit. The outcome data is an overall average and range from all time points. (NCT01166958)
Timeframe: These were measured at the baseline and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5 and 6 month visits.

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Daily Teriparatide (Forteo)0.9887
Monthly Cycles of Teriparatide Followed by Raloxifene0.5445

[back to top]

Safety Analysis

Arms were compared for total number of adverse events, including severe and serious adverse events. (NCT01171690)
Timeframe: Approximately 90 days after surgery

Interventionevents (Number)
Teriparatide0
Control0

[back to top]

Hospital Length of Stay

"Hospital length of stay from initiation of therapy with calcium and calcitriol to ready to discharge from a calcium perspective (calcium level > 7.5 mg/dL and increasing x 2 over 12 hours in an asymptomatic patient with stable therapy and no need for intravenous (IV) calcium in last 24 hours)." (NCT01171690)
Timeframe: Approximately 7 days after surgery

Interventiondays (Mean)
Teriparatide1.1
Control2.4

[back to top]

C-terminal Telopeptide

The mean change in C-terminal telopeptide from baseline after 12 month of treatment (NCT01225055)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 Months

,,
Interventionng/ml (Mean)
0 months3 months6 months12 months
Teriparatide0.380.720.740.59
Teriparatide and Vibration0.380.430.440.45
Vibration0.310.250.250.29

[back to top]

Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase

The mean change in Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase from baseline after 12 month of therapy (NCT01225055)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 Months

,,
Interventionng/ml (Mean)
0 months3 months6 months12 months
Teriparatide15.318.420.320.4
Teriparatide and Vibration12.412.816.214.0
Vibration13.911.611.311.8

[back to top]

Amino-terminal Propeptide of Type 1 Collagen

The mean change in Amino-terminal of type 1 collagen from baseline after 12 months of treatment (NCT01225055)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 Months

,,
Interventionng/ml (Mean)
0 months3 months6 months12 months
Teriparatide67.1128163124
Teriparatide and Vibration67.990.112577.0
Vibration64.751.854.549.8

[back to top]

Bone Mineral Density BMD of the Total Hip as Assessed by DXA.

The mean change in BMD of the total hip after 12 month of treatment (NCT01225055)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 Months

,,
Interventiong/cm^2 (Mean)
0 months3 months6 months12 months
Teriparatide0.660.650.670.66
Teriparatide and Vibration0.640.650.650.65
Vibration0.630.630.630.64

[back to top]

Bone Mineral Density (BMD) by DXA at the Lumbar Spine.

The mean change in BMD at the lumbar spine from baseline after 12 month of treatment (NCT01225055)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 Months

,,
Interventiong/cm^2 (Mean)
0 months3 months6 months12 months
Teriparatide1.041.051.071.09
Teriparatide and Vibration1.021.041.051.07
Vibration1.001.011.021.02

[back to top]

Bone Mineral Density (BMD) by DXA at Femoral Neck

The mean change in BMD of the femoral neck after 12 month of treatment (NCT01225055)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 Months

,,
Interventiong/cm^2 (Mean)
0 months3 months6 months12 months
Teriparatide0.660.660.670.66
Teriparatide and Vibration0.620.630.630.63
Vibration0.630.640.620.63

[back to top]

Part B - Skin Irritation and Sensitization by Draize Score

Number of evaluation points (patches) showing defined Draize score. Erythema and edema were used to determine skin irritation and sensitization. Score 0 = No Erythema/Edema; Score 1 = Very slight Erythema/Edema (barely perceptible); Score 2 = Well defined Erythema/Edema (edges of area well defined by definite raising); Score 3 = Moderate to Severe Erythema/Edema (raised approximately 1 mm); Score 4 = Severe Edema (raised more than 1 mm and extending beyond area of exposure). (NCT01250145)
Timeframe: Days 1 - 19 and 34 - 37

,,,,,
Interventionpatches with Draize scores (Number)
Erythema: Score 0Erythema: Score 1Erythema: Score 2Erythema: Score 3Edema: Score 0Edema: Score 1Edema: Score 2Edema: Score 3Edema: Score 4
Part B: Active Patch - 1 Hour Post Patch Removal122150384014930114139954
Part B: Active Patch - 24 Hours Post Patch Application4361899138117596615310
Part B: Active Patch - Prior to Patch Application139910503002280197200
Part B: Placebo Patch - 1 Hour Post Patch Removal271169849510157276613600
Part B: Placebo Patch - 24 Hours Post Patch Application7841578107020144351910
Part B: Placebo Patch - Prior to Patch Application15259242502330143100

[back to top]

Part B - Patch Adhesion Score

Number of patches with adhesion score. Score 0 = ≥90% adhered (essentially no lift off the skin); Score 1= ≥75% to <90% adhered (some edges only lifting off the skin); Score 2 = ≥50% to <75% adhered (less than half of the patch lifting off the skin); Score 3 = >0% to <50% adhered but not detached (more than half of the patch lifting off the skin without falling off); Score 4 = 0% adhered - patch detached (patch completely off the skin). (NCT01250145)
Timeframe: Days 1 - 19 and 34 - 37

,
Interventionpatches with adhesive score (Number)
Score 0Score 1Score 2Score 3Score 4
Active Patch26084013913
Placebo Patch26083117175

[back to top]

Part A - Patch Adhesion Score

Number of patches with adhesion score. Score 0 = ≥90% adhered (essentially no lift off the skin); Score 1= ≥75% to <90% adhered (some edges only lifting off the skin); Score 2 = ≥50% to <75% adhered (less than half of the patch lifting off the skin); Score 3 = >0% to <50% adhered but not detached (more than half of the patch lifting off the skin without falling off); Score 4 = 0% adhered - patch detached (patch completely off the skin). (NCT01250145)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 22

,
Interventionpatches with adhesive score (Number)
Score 0Score 1Score 2Score 3Score 4
Active Patch8798101
Placebo Patch8827000

[back to top]

Part A - Cumulative Skin Irritation by Draize Score

Number of evaluation points (patches) showing defined Draize score. Erythema and edema were used to determine skin irritation. Score 0 = No Erythema/Edema; Score 1 = Very slight Erythema/Edema (barely perceptible); Score 2 = Well defined Erythema/Edema (edges of area well defined by definite raising); Score 3 = Moderate to Severe Erythema/Edema (raised approximately 1 millimeter [mm]). (NCT01250145)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 22

,,,,,
Interventionpatches with Draize scores (Number)
Erythema: Score 0Erythema: Score 1Erythema: Score 2Erythema: Score 3Edema: Score 0Edema: Score 1Edema: Score 2Edema: Score 3
Part A: Active Patch - 1 Hour Post Patch Removal4067417601136001751
Part A: Active Patch - 24 Hours Post Patch Application1466331062370454621
Part A: Active Patch - Prior to Patch Application299523651604270131
Part A: Placebo Patch - 1 Hour Post Patch Removal697131080298511800
Part A: Placebo Patch - 24 Hours Post Patch Application205601792539322260
Part A: Placebo Patch - Prior to Patch Application39045245171616651

[back to top]

Bone Turnover: Cortical Tissue Area

"Bone turnover was assessed indirectly by evaluating cellular parameters of PTH action (i.e. numbers of osteoblasts, osteoclasts, apoptotic osteoblasts). The methods used to obtain the outcomes described below were bone histomorphometry using the following abbreviation:~Ct.T.Ar: Ct Cort(ex)(ical) Tissue Area (2D)b First set refers to baseline pre-drug data and second set was taken at the end of the drug administration phase." (NCT01279187)
Timeframe: 10 weeks

,
Interventionmm2/week (Mean)
Ct.T.Ar first set Cortical Tissue AreaCt. T.Ar second set Cortical Tissue Area
Control1.81.8
Teriparatide2.22.2

[back to top]

Bone Turnover: Bone Perimeter Length

"Bone histomorphometry was used to assess bone perimeter length in mm as follows:~Cn.Pm cancellous: Cancellous Bone Perimeter Ec.Pm: endocortical bone perimeter Ps.Pm: Periosteal Periosteal bone perimeter" (NCT01279187)
Timeframe: 10 weeks

,
Interventionmm (Mean)
Cn.Pm cancellous Cancellous bone PerimeterEc.Pm endocortical bone perimeterPs.Pm Periosteal Periosteal bone perimeter
Control18.73.64.3
Teriparatide20.82.94.1

[back to top]

Bone Turnover: Bone Percentages

"Oc.S/BS cancellous: Osteoclast suface divided by bone surface. Osteoclastic surface as percent of total bone surface in cancellous bone. Percent cancellous bone perimeter with osteoclasts (large, multinuclear, TRAP positive cells).~OS/BS cancellous: Osteoid surface divided by bone surface. Percentage of cancellous bone perimeter covered with osteoid.~Oc.S/BS endocortical: Osteoclastic surface as percent of total bone surface in endocortical bone.~OS/BS endocortical: Percentage of endocortical bone perimeter covered with osteoid.~Oc.S/BS Periosteal: Osteoclastic surface as percent of total bone surface in periosteal bone.~Ob.S/BS Periosteal: Percent periosteal bone perimeter with osteoid and adjacent osteoblasts, identified as plump cells with a single, eccentric nucleus and a pale-staining golgi apparatus. Osteoblast Surface divided by bone surface in periosteal bone.~OS/BS Periosteal: Percentage of periosteal bone perimeter covered with osteoid." (NCT01279187)
Timeframe: 10 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage (%) (Mean)
Oc.S/BS cancellousOS/BS cancellousOc.S/BS endocorticalOS/BS endocorticalOc.S/BS PeriostealOb.S/BS PeriostealOS/BS Periosteal
Control0.15120.3170.4525
Teriparatide0.3480140.165

[back to top]

Bone Formation Rate

To determine the impact of PTH on bone quality and bone turnover in the oral cavity. The primary outcome variable will be bone formation rate. (NCT01279187)
Timeframe: 10 weeks

Interventionmm2/week (Median)
Teriparatide1.76
Control2.22

[back to top]

Bone Turnover (Mineral Apposition Rates)

"Bone turnover was assessed indirectly by bone histomorphometry using the following abbreviations: Mineral Apposition Rate (MAR): Distance between 2 fluorochrome markers that comprise a double label on the surfaces of cancellous bone measured at an average of 4 equally-spaced sites per double label. These measurements will be performed on 20 double fluorochrome labels per bone and the average divided by the time between the midpoints of the two labeling periods. MAR serves as an index of osteoblast activity. Reported for cancellous (Cn), endocortical (Ec) at baseline (pre-drug intervention, listed as first set) and at the end of drug intervention (second set). First set refers to baseline information (pre-drug), and second set refers to data evaluated at the end of the drug administration phase. Periosteal (Ps) data and Ec.Mar Endocortical MAR second set was reviewed but no analyzable labeling was noted and so this data is not reported." (NCT01279187)
Timeframe: 10 weeks

,
Interventionum/day (Mean)
Cn.MAR (Cancellous MAR) - first setEc.MAR Endocortical MAR - first setCn.MAR Cancellous MAR- second set
Control0.30.60.3
Teriparatide0.50.70.2

[back to top]

Patient Reported Outcomes Measured by: Visual Analog Score (VAS), European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Scores at 1 Year

"The self-reported pain Visual Analog Score (VAS), the score range is 0-100 with higher scores indicating more pain.~European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) is a standardized instrument for measuring generic health status, the scale range is from 0.000 (death) to 1.000 (perfect health).~Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) provides information about how back or leg pain is affecting the ability to manage in everyday life, the points range from 0-50, which is doubled and reported as a percentage. Higher scores indicate higher disability." (NCT01292252)
Timeframe: One year

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Visual Analog Score (VAS)European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Control: Saline Placebo9.670.70831.9
Treatment: Forteo, Terapeptide 20 ug11.670.73332.3

[back to top]

Quality of Spine Fusion, Measured by the Number of Participants With Complete Spine Fusion at 1 Year

Quality of spine fusion, measured by the number of participants with complete spine fusion at 1 year. Spine fusion at one year was assessed using thin-section helical computed tomography (CT) scan of the lumbar spine. (NCT01292252)
Timeframe: One year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment: Forteo, Terapeptide 20 ug11
Control: Saline Placebo6

[back to top]

Adverse Effects

Number of participants with serious adverse events and other (not including serious) adverse events at one year are reported. (NCT01292252)
Timeframe: One year

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Serious Adverse EventsOther (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
Control: Saline Placebo16
Treatment: Forteo, Terapeptide 20 ug19

[back to top]

% Change From Baseline BMD in L1-L4 Axial Lumbar Spine at Week 24

(NCT01321723)
Timeframe: 24 weeks from baseline

Interventionpercentage of change (Mean)
Forsteo (Teriparatide)5.07
PTH Analog Tablets2.21
Placebo-0.17

[back to top]

% Change From Baseline in Bone Formation Marker (P1NP) at Week 24

(NCT01321723)
Timeframe: 24 weeks from baseline

Interventionpercentage of change (Mean)
Forsteo (Teriparatide)210.07
PTH Analog Tablets12.05
Placebo-1.75

[back to top]

% Change From Baseline in Bone Resorption Marker (CTx-1) at Week 24

Serum collagen type I (CTx-1) fragments generated during osteoclastic bone turnover are biomarkers for bone resorption. β-CrossLaps electrochemiluminescent sandwich immunoassay was used. (NCT01321723)
Timeframe: 24 weeks from baseline

Interventionpercentage of change (Mean)
Forsteo (Teriparatide)113.32
PTH Analog Tablets12.72
Placebo15.13

[back to top]

Systemic Absorption of PTH at Week 24

AUC: (PTH analog tablets timepoints - baseline to 5.75 hours) (Forsteo injection timepoints - baseline to 2 hours) (NCT01321723)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionpg* hr/mL (Mean)
Forsteo (Teriparatide)152
PTH Analog Tablets165

[back to top]

Number of Participants With AEs as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

(NCT01321723)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Forsteo (Teriparatide)23
PTH Analog Tablets30
Placebo21

[back to top]

Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Lumbar Spine From Baseline to 18 Months

(NCT01343004)
Timeframe: Basline and 18 months

Interventionpercent change from baseline (Mean)
Placebo0.48
BA058 80 mcg (Abaloparatide)9.20
Teriparatide9.12

[back to top]

Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total Hip From Baseline to Month 18

(NCT01343004)
Timeframe: Baseline and 18 months

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Placebo-0.08
BA058 80 mcg (Abaloparatide)3.44
Teriparatide2.81

[back to top]

Number of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Associated With Hypercalcemia at 18 Months

(NCT01343004)
Timeframe: 18 months

InterventionHypercalcemic events (Number)
Placebo5
BA058 80 mcg (Abaloparatide)15
Teriparatide34

[back to top]

Number of Participants With New Vertebral Fractures at 18 Months

(NCT01343004)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo30
BA058 80 mcg (Abaloparatide)4
Teriparatide6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Non-vertebral Fractures at 18 Months

(NCT01343004)
Timeframe: 18 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Placebo33
BA058 80 mcg (Abaloparatide)18
Teriparatide24

[back to top]

Percent Change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Femoral Neck From Baseline to Month 18

(NCT01343004)
Timeframe: Baseline and 18 months

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Placebo-0.44
BA058 80 mcg (Abaloparatide)2.90
Teriparatide2.26

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Joint Erosion Volume Measured by 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography (3D CT) Scan

Both hands were scanned using a CT scanner. A semi-automated software tool was used to segment the erosion margins in 3D. A board certified radiologist identified the individual erosions in six sub-regions: radius, ulna, proximal carpals, distal carpals, metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints. The average total in a single hand/wrist was calculated. A negative change from Baseline(less joint erosions) indicates improvement. (NCT01400516)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

,
Interventioncubic millimeter (mm^3) (Median)
BaselineChange from Baseline at Month 12
Control Arm571.49.1
Teriparatide369.8-0.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 Joint Count C-Reactive Protein (DAS-28 CRP)

The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) for a total possible score of 2 to 10. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. (NCT01400516)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline at Month 12
Control Arm2.73-0.50
Teriparatide2.660.42

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Measured by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) and Instant Vertebral Assessment (IVA) Scan

BMD was measured at the lumbosacral spine antero-posterior and at the femoral neck using a densitometer. A positive change from Baseline (increased bone density) indicates improvement. (NCT01400516)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

,
Interventiongrams/centimeters squared (g/cm^2) (Mean)
Spine, BaselineSpine, Change from Baseline at Month12Femoral neck, BaselineFemoral neck, Change from Baseline at Month 12
Control Arm0.93-0.0020.73-0.03
Teriparatide0.910.060.680.03

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serum Calcium Level Over 11.0 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL)

Total serum calcium concentration adjusted by serum albumin concentration. Corrected calcium (mg/dL) = total serum calcium concentration (mg/dL) + 4.0 - serum albumin concentration (grams per deciliter [g/dL]). Postdose refers to after Teriparatide dose. (NCT01430104)
Timeframe: Day 28 (16 and 24 hours postdose)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
16 hours postdose24 hours postdose
600 mg Aspara-CA + 1 µg Alfarol + 20 µg Teriparatide00

[back to top]

Mean Serum Calcium Levels

Daily profiles of corrected mean serum calcium levels were determined for each participant. Corrected calcium (milligram per deciliter [mg/dL]) = total serum calcium concentration (mg/dL) + 4.0 - serum albumin concentration (grams per deciliter [g/dL]). The Least Squares (LS) means were adjusted for Day, Timepoint, Day*Timepoint, and random error. At baseline, participants received only Aspara-CA and Alfarol supplements and the timepoints were based on the times before Aspara-CA and Alfarol administration (predose) and after Aspara-CA and Alfarol administration (postdose). During the 28-day Teriparatide Treatment Period, timepoints were based on before Teriparatide administration (predose) and after Teriparatide administration (postdose). (NCT01430104)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1 of 14-day Lead-in Period) and Day 1 and Day 7 and Day 14 and Day 28 at 0 hours (h), 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 16 h, and 24 h postdose (28-day Teriparatide Treatment Period)

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline: 0 h predoseBaseline: 2 h postdoseBaseline: 4 h postdoseBaseline: 6 h postdoseBaseline: 16 h postdoseBaseline: 24 h postdoseDay 1: 0 h predoseDay 1: 2 h postdoseDay 1: 4 h postdoseDay 1: 6 h postdoseDay 1: 16 h postdoseDay 1: 24 h postdoseDay 7: 0 h predose (n=28)Day 7: 2 h postdose (n=28)Day 7: 4 h postdose (n=28)Day 7: 6 h postdose (n=28)Day 7: 16 h postdose (n=28)Day 7: 24 h postdose (n=28)Day 14: 0 h predose (n=28)Day 14: 2 h postdose (n=28)Day 14: 4 h postdose (n=28)Day 14: 6 h postdose (n=28)Day 14: 16 h postdose (n=28)Day 14: 24 h postdose (n=28)Day 28: 0 h predose (n=28)Day 28: 2 h postdose (n=28)Day 28: 4 h postdose (n=28)Day 28: 6 h postdose (n=28)Day 28: 16 h postdose (n=28)Day 28: 24 h postdose (n=28)
600 mg Aspara-CA + 1 µg Alfarol + 20 µg Teriparatide9.009.118.988.928.978.748.749.179.169.148.858.709.029.419.439.369.028.828.999.359.399.299.038.898.989.419.429.339.048.85

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serum Calcium Level Over 11.0 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL) and 13.5 mg/dL, Respectively at Any Time Postbaseline

Total serum calcium concentration adjusted by serum albumin concentration. Corrected calcium (mg/dL) = total serum calcium concentration (mg/dL) + 4.0 - serum albumin concentration (grams per deciliter [g/dL]). Serum calcium levels presented are for any time postdose on any day during the 28-day Teriparatide Treatment Period. (NCT01430104)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to Day 28 (Teriparatide Treatment Period)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Serum Calcium > 11.0 mg/dLSerum Calcium > 13.5 mg/dL
600 mg Aspara-CA + 1 µg Alfarol + 20 µg Teriparatide00

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Daily Urine Calcium Excreted Over 0.3 Grams Per Day (g/Day) at Any Time Postbaseline

Urine calcium levels presented are for any day during the 28-day Teriparatide Treatment Period. (NCT01430104)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to Day 28 (28-day Teriparatide Treatment Period)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
600 mg Aspara-CA + 1 µg Alfarol + 20 µg Teriparatide0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Daily Urine Calcium Excreted

(NCT01430104)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 (28-day Teriparatide Treatment Period)

Interventiongrams per day (g/day) (Mean)
Change from Baseline at Day 1Change from Baseline at Day 7 (N=27)Change from Baseline at Day 14 (N=27)Change from Baseline at Day 28 (N=27)
600 mg Aspara-CA + 1 µg Alfarol + 20 µg Teriparatide0.010.020.010.01

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Calcium

Corrected calcium (milligram per deciliter [mg/dL]) = total serum calcium concentration (mg/dL) + 4.0 - serum albumin concentration (grams per deciliter [g/dL]). The Least Squares (LS) means were controlled for Day, Timepoint, Day*Timepoint, and random error. Postdose refers to after Teriparatide dose. (NCT01430104)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1 of the 14-day Lead-in Period), Day 1, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28 at 0 hours (h), 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 16 h, and 24 h postdose (28-day Teriparatide Treatment Period)

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Change from Baseline Day 1: 0 h predoseChange from Baseline at Day 1: 2 h postdoseChange from Baseline at Day 1: 4 h postdoseChange from Baseline at Day 1: 6 h postdoseChange from Baseline at Day 1: 16 h postdoseChange from Baseline at Day 1: 24 h postdoseChange from Baseline at Day 7: 0 h predose, n=28Change from Baseline at Day 7: 2 h postdose, n=28Change from Baseline at Day 7: 4 h postdose, n=28Change from Baseline at Day 7: 6 h postdose, n=28Change from Baseline at Day 7: 16 h postdose, n=28Change from Baseline at Day 7: 24 h postdose, n=28Change from Baseline at Day 14: 0 h predose, n=28Change from Baseline at Day 14: 2 h postdose, n=28Change from Baseline at Day 14: 4 h postdose, n=28Change from Baseline at Day 14: 6 h postdose, n=28Change from Baseline at Day 14: 16 h postdose,n=28Change from Baseline at Day 14: 24 h postdose,n=28Change from Baseline at Day 28: 0 h predose, n=28Change from Baseline at Day 28: 2 h postdose, n=28Change from Baseline at Day 28: 4 h postdose, n=28Change from Baseline at Day 28: 6 h postdose, n=28Change from Baseline at Day 28: 16 h postdose,n=28Change from Baseline at Day 28: 24 h postdose,n=28
600 mg Aspara-CA + 1 µg Alfarol + 20 µg Teriparatide-0.2550.0590.1830.221-0.117-0.0380.0180.2860.4500.4360.0610.068-0.0180.2320.4040.3680.0680.143-0.0210.2860.4360.4040.0820.104

[back to top]

Concentrations of Serum 1,25-Hydroxy-2-Vitamin D3

(NCT01430104)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Predose, 28-day Teriparatide Treatment Period) and Day 8 and Day 15 and Day 29 (Follow-up Period) and Day 35 (Follow-up Period)

Interventionpicogram per milliliter (pg/mL) (Mean)
Day 1Day 8 (N=28)Day 15 (N=28)Day 29 (N=28)Day 35 (N=28)
600 mg Aspara-CA + 1 µg Alfarol + 20 µg Teriparatide54.0105.3108.598.153.9

[back to top]

Concentrations of Serum 25-Hydroxy-Vitamin D

(NCT01430104)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Predose, 28-day Teriparatide Treatment Period) and Day 8 and Day 15 and Day 29 (Follow-up Period) and Day 35 (Follow-up Period)

Interventionnanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean)
Day 1Day 8 (N=28)Day 15 (N=28)Day 29 (N=28)Day 35 (N=28)
600 mg Aspara-CA + 1 µg Alfarol + 20 µg Teriparatide23.022.121.520.121.6

[back to top]

Mean Daily Urine Calcium Excreted

(NCT01430104)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 7 and Day 14 and Day 28 (28-day Teriparatide Treatment Period)

Interventiongrams per day (g/day) (Mean)
Day 1Day 7 (N=27)Day 14 (N=27)Day 28 (N=27)
600 mg Aspara-CA + 1 µg Alfarol + 20 µg Teriparatide0.130.140.130.13

[back to top]

Change in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (LS-BMD) on Active Medication

Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) will be used to measuring bone mineral density (BMD). (NCT01440803)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 months

Interventionpercentage of change (Mean)
Teriparatide (Forteo)10.1
Placebo Saline Injection4.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With No Revision Surgery at 12 Months After Internal Fixation of a Low-Trauma Femoral Neck Fracture

Revision surgery (re-operation) was defined as any additional surgical intervention performed or recommended at the site of the index procedure, except those that were planned at the time of the index procedure. (NCT01473589)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Teriparatide87
Placebo86

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Regain Their Prefracture Ambulatory Status

Prefracture ambulatory status was defined as either ambulatory with or without a walking aid. A participant was considered to have regained their prefracture ambulatory status if the participant's postsurgery ambulatory status was returned to or was improved from their pre-surgery ambulatory status. Percentage was calculated as = (number of participants who regained their ambulatory status / total number analyzed) * 100. (NCT01473589)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Teriparatide73.2
Placebo56.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Functional Evidence of Healing

"Functional healing was defined as ability to walk with a gait speed ≥ 0.05 meters/second (m/s) with a change from baseline ≥ -0.1 m/s. The walking test involved having the participant walk a distance of 7 meters (m) at a self-selected, comfortable pace. A 4-m portion of the test was timed to determine the participant's gait speed in m/s.~Percentage was calculated as: (number of participants with functional evidence of healing / total number of participants analyzed) * 100." (NCT01473589)
Timeframe: 12 Months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Teriparatide85.4
Placebo74.0

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to 6 Months in Gait Speed

The walking test involved having the participant walk a distance of 7 m at a self-selected, comfortable pace. A 4-m portion of the test was timed to determine the participant's gait speed in m/s. LS means was calculated using ANCOVA and adjusted for baseline, treatment group, region, fracture type, and fixation type. (NCT01473589)
Timeframe: Baseline, up to 6 Months

Interventionm/s (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide-0.672
Placebo1.524

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Radiographic Evidence of Healing

"The signs of femoral neck fracture healing included disappearance of the fracture line on radiographs. If a participant had radiographic evidence of healing at the 12-month visit, that participant was considered to have radiographic evidence of healing.~Percentage was calculated as: (number of participants with radiographic evidence of healing / total number of participants analyzed) * 100." (NCT01473589)
Timeframe: Randomization up to 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Teriparatide78.3
Placebo78.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Pain Control During Ambulation

The worst pain numeric rating scale (NRS) was used to assess the impact of pain on a participant's life. NRS Item 3 assessed the worst musculoskeletal pain severity during the walking test. Pain was measured by an 11-point Likert scale. The following cut-points were used to categorize the NRS responses: 0 = no pain, 1 to 4 = mild pain, 5 to 6 = moderate pain, and 7 to 10 = severe pain. Participants with an NRS score of <7 were categorized as having no severe fracture-site pain with ambulation and no worsening of NRS scores >2 from baseline. Percentage was calculated as: (Number of participants with pain control during ambulation / total number of participants) * 100. (NCT01473589)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Teriparatide91.5
Placebo89.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Able to Ambulate

Ability to ambulate was defined as ambulatory with convalescent aid or without convalescent aid. Percentage was calculated as: (number of participants able to ambulate / number of total participants analyzed) * 100. (NCT01473589)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Teriparatide97.9
Placebo98

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to 6 Months on European Quality of Life Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Health State Score

The EQ-5D is a 5-item, self-reported, generic, multidimensional, health-related, quality-of-life instrument with 5 items. Overall health state score was also self-reported using a visual analogue scale (VAS) marked on a scale scored from 0 (worse imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). LS mean was calculated using ANCOVA and adjusted for baseline, treatment group, and region. (NCT01473589)
Timeframe: Baseline, up to 6 Months

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide7.4
Placebo7.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Without Severe Fracture-Site Pain During Weight Bearing

The worst pain NRS was used to assess the impact of pain on a participant's life. Fracture-site pain severity was assessed for pain on weight bearing. Pain was measured by an 11-point Likert scale. Participants with an NRS score of <7 during weight bearing and no worsening of NRS >2 from baseline were categorized as having no severe fracture-site pain. Percentage was calculated as: (number of participants with pain control during weight bearing / total number of participants) * 100. (NCT01473589)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Teriparatide89.4
Placebo88.0

[back to top]

Time to Revision Surgery

Time to revision surgery was defined as the time from initial hip fracture surgery to revision surgery, or recommendation for revision surgery if recommended but not performed. Time to revision surgery was censored at the date of the last contact. (NCT01473589)
Timeframe: Baseline to revision surgery (up to 14.14 Months)

Interventiondays (Median)
Teriparatide358.5
Placebo350

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to 6 Months in Worst Fracture-Site Pain

The worst pain NRS was used to assess the impact of pain on a participant's life. Participants with an NRS score of <7 were categorized as having no severe fracture-site pain. Least Squares (LS) means was calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and adjusted for baseline, treatment group, region, fracture type, and fixation type. (NCT01473589)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 Months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
During ambulation (n = 45, 46)During 24 hours preceding visit (n = 47, 50)On weight bearing (n = 46, 49)
Placebo0.2-0.80.8
Teriparatide0.2-0.30.7

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to 6 Months on Short Form-12 (SF-12) Physical (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores

SF-12 is a self-reported questionnaire covering a mental component score (MCS) and a physical component score (PCS), each scoring from a 0 to 100 (worst to best) scale. LS mean was calculated using ANCOVA and adjusted for baseline, treatment group, region, fracture type, fixation type, visit, and visit-by-treatment interaction. (NCT01473589)
Timeframe: Baseline, up to 6 Months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
PCS Month 6 (n = 49, 49)MCS Month 6 (n = 49, 49)
Placebo-4.75-0.49
Teriparatide-3.73-0.58

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to 6 Months on Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)

WOMAC is: a self-reported questionnaire that consisted of 24 questions covering 3 health domains: Pain (5 items: during walking, using stairs, in bed, sitting or lying, and standing), Stiffness (2 items: after first waking and later in the day), and Physical Function. Each domain was scored by summing the individual items and transforming the scores into a 0 to 100 (best to worst) scale. LS mean was calculated using ANCOVA and adjusted for baseline, treatment group, region, fracture type, fixation type, visit, and visit-by-treatment interaction. (NCT01473589)
Timeframe: Baseline, up to 6 Months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Physical Function Score - Month 6 (n=48, 51)Pain Score - Month 6 ( n = 51, 51)Stiffness Score - Month 6 (n = 51, 51)
Placebo12.810.311.8
Teriparatide12.98.213.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Without Severe Fracture-Site Pain During 24 Hours Prior to Visit

The worst pain NRS was used to assess the impact of pain on a participant's life. Fracture-site pain severity was assessed for pain in the 24 hours preceding a visit. Pain was measured by an 11-point Likert scale. Participants with an NRS score of <7 in the 24 hours preceding a visit and no worsening of NRS >2 from baseline were categorized as having no severe fracture-site pain. Percentage was calculated as: (number of participants with pain control during 24 hours preceding a visit / total number of participants) * 100. (NCT01473589)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Teriparatide88.0
Placebo82.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Without Severe Fracture-Site Pain During 24 Hours Prior to Visit

The NRS was used to assess the impact of pain on a participant's life. Fracture-site pain severity was assessed for pain in the 24 hours preceding a visit. Pain was measured by an 11-point Likert scale. Participants with an NRS score of <7 in the 24 hours preceding a visit and no worsening of NRS score >2 from baseline were categorized as having no severe fracture-site pain. Percentage was calculated as: (number of participants with pain control during 24 hours preceding a visit / total number of participants analyzed) * 100. (NCT01473602)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Teriparatide81.8
Placebo92.9

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to 6 Months on Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)

WOMAC: was a self-reported questionnaire that consisted of 24 questions covering 3 health domains: Pain (5 items: during walking, using stairs, in bed, sitting or lying, and standing), Stiffness (2 items: after first waking and later in the day), and Physical Function. Each domain was scored by summing the individual items and transforming the scores into a 0 to 100 (best to worst) scale. Lower scores indicated better health status or functioning. LS means was calculated using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline, treatment group, region, fracture type, fixation type, visit, and visit-by-treatment interaction. (NCT01473602)
Timeframe: Baseline, up to 6 Months

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Physical Function Score - Month 6 (n=11, 12)Pain Score - Month 6 (n=12, 13)Stiffness Score - Month 6 (n=12, 15)
Placebo1.113.616.9
Teriparatide10.510.613.5

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to 6 Months on European Quality of Life Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Overall Health Score

The EQ-5D is a 5-item, self-reported, generic, multidimensional, health-related, quality-of-life instrument with 5 items. Overall health state score was also self-reported using a visual analogue scale (VAS) marked on a scale scored from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). Higher scores represented better health state with 0 representing worst imaginable health state and 100 representing best imaginable health state. LS means was calculated using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline, treatment group, region. (NCT01473602)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 Months

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide13.0
Placebo10.4

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to 6 Months on Short Form-12 (SF-12) Physical (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores

SF-12 is a self-reported questionnaire covering a mental component score (MCS) and a physical component score (PCS), each scoring from a 0 to 100 (worst to best) scale. LS means was calculated using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline, treatment group, region, fracture type, fixation type, visit, and visit-by-treatment interaction. (NCT01473602)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 Months

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
PCS Month 6 (n=12, 14)MCS Month 6 (n=12, 14)
Placebo1.78-10.71
Teriparatide0.89-8.84

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to 6 Months in Worst Fracture-Site Pain

The worst pain NRS was used to assess the impact of pain on a participant's life. Participants with an NRS score of <7 were categorized as having no severe fracture-site pain. Least squares (LS) means was calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) adjusted for baseline, treatment group, region, fracture type, and fixation type. (NCT01473602)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 Months

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
During ambulation ( n= 10, 13)During 24 hours preceding visit (n= 10, 14)On weight bearing (n= 10, 13)
Placebo-1.3-1.4-1.4
Teriparatide-1.6-1.2-2.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Able to Ambulate

Ability to ambulate was defined as ambulatory with or without convalescent aid. Percentage was calculated as: (number of participants able to ambulate / total number of participants analyzed) * 100. (NCT01473602)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Teriparatide76.9
Placebo93.3

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to 6 Months in Gait Speed

The walking test involved having the participant walk a distance of 7 m at a self-selected, comfortable pace. A 4-m portion of the test was timed to determine the participant's gait speed in m/s. LS means was calculated using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline, treatment group, region, fracture type, and fixation type (NCT01473602)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 Months

Interventionm/s (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide0.168
Placebo0.118

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Without Severe Fracture-Site Pain During Weight Bearing

The worst pain NRS was used to assess the impact of pain on a participant's life. Fracture-site pain severity was assessed for pain on weight bearing. Pain was measured by an 11-point Likert scale. Participants with an NRS score of <7 during weight bearing and no worsening of NRS score >2 from baseline were categorized as having no severe fracture-site pain. Percentage was calculated as: (number of participants with pain control during weight bearing / total number of participants) * 100. (NCT01473602)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Teriparatide90.9
Placebo84.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Radiographic Evidence of Healing

"The signs of femoral neck fracture healing and healing complications included disappearance of the fracture line on radiographs. If a participant had radiographic evidence of healing at the 12-month visit, that participant was considered to have radiographic evidence of healing.~Percentage was calculated as: (number of participants with radiographic evidence of healing / total number of participants analyzed) * 100." (NCT01473602)
Timeframe: Randomization up to 12 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Teriparatide55.6
Placebo65.0

[back to top]

Time to Revision Surgery

Time to revision surgery was defined as the time from initial hip fracture surgery to revision surgery, or recommendation for revision surgery if recommended but not performed. Time to revision surgery was censored at the date of the last contact. (NCT01473602)
Timeframe: Baseline to Revision Surgery (up to 14.14 Months)

InterventionDays (Median)
Teriparatide333.5
Placebo361

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Pain Control During Ambulation

The worst pain numeric rating scale (NRS) was used to assess the impact of pain on a participant's life. NRS Item 3 assessed the worst musculoskeletal pain severity during the walking test. Pain was measured by an 11-point Likert scale. The following cut-points were used to categorize the NRS responses: 0 = no pain, 1 to 4 = mild pain, 5 to 6 = moderate pain, and 7 to 10 = severe pain. Higher scores indicated more severe pain. Participants with an NRS score of <7 and no worsening of NRS scores >2 from baseline were categorized as having no severe fracture-site pain. Percentage was calculated as: (number of participants with pain control during ambulation / total number of participants analyzed) * 100. (NCT01473602)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Teriparatide90.0
Placebo100.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With No Revision Surgery at 12 Months After Internal Fixation of a Low-Trauma Femoral Neck Fracture

Revision surgery (re-operation) was defined as any additional surgical intervention performed or recommended at the site of the index procedure, except those that were planned at the time of the index procedure. (NCT01473602)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Teriparatide74
Placebo93

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Functional Evidence of Healing

"Functional healing was defined as ability to walk with a gait speed ≥ 0.05 meters/second (m/s) with a change from baseline ≥ -0.1 m/s. The walking test involved having the participant walk a distance of 7 meters (m) at a self-selected, comfortable pace. A 4-m portion of the test was timed to determine the participant's gait speed in m/s.~Percentage was calculated as: (number of participants with functional evidence of healing / total number of participants analyzed) * 100." (NCT01473602)
Timeframe: Up to 12 Months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Teriparatide76.9
Placebo66.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Regained Their Prefracture Ambulatory Status

Prefracture ambulatory status was defined as either ambulatory with or without a walking aid. A participant was considered to have regained their prefracture ambulatory status if the participant's postsurgery ambulatory status was returned to or was improved from their pre-surgery ambulatory status. Percentage was calculated as = (number of participants who regained their ambulatory status / total number of participants analyzed) *100. (NCT01473602)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Teriparatide47.1
Placebo62.5

[back to top]

New Morphometric Vertebral Fractures

counting the total new morphometric vertebral fractures as determined by x-ray from baseline through end of study (NCT01611571)
Timeframe: baseline through 18 months

Interventionvertebral fracture (Number)
Active Risedronate Active Teriparatide1
Active Risedronte Placebo Teriparatide1
Placebo Risedronate Active Teriparatide0

[back to top]

Change in Spine Bone Density

change in spine bone density at 18 months measured by DXA 18 and 24 months (NCT01611571)
Timeframe: 18 months

Intervention% change in LS BMD (Least Squares Mean)
Active Risedronate Active Teriparatide6.95
Active Risedronte Placebo Teriparatide3.76
Placebo Risedronate Active Teriparatide5.68

[back to top]

Change in FN BMD at 18 Months

Change in the Femoral Neck BMD at 18 month (NCT01611571)
Timeframe: 18 months

Intervention% change in TH BMD (Mean)
Active Risedronate Active Teriparatide8.45
Active Risedronte Placebo Teriparatide0.5
Placebo Risedronate Active Teriparatide3.89

[back to top]

Change in Forearm Bone Density

change in 1/3 radius of forearm bone density as measured by DXA (NCT01611571)
Timeframe: baseline and 18 months

Intervention% change in 1/3 Radius BMD (Mean)
Active Risedronate Active Teriparatide1.6
Active Risedronte Placebo Teriparatide0.11
Placebo Risedronate Active Teriparatide0.02

[back to top]

Change in Hip Bone Density

change in hip bone density measured by DXA (NCT01611571)
Timeframe: baseline and 18 months

Intervention% change in TH BMD (Mean)
Active Risedronate Active Teriparatide3.86
Active Risedronte Placebo Teriparatide0.82
Placebo Risedronate Active Teriparatide0.29

[back to top]

The Percent Change in Circulating Osteoprogenitor Cells as Assessed by Flow Cytometry in the Blood Before and After Treatment With Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) or Alendronate (ALN).

(NCT01656629)
Timeframe: up to 3 months

Interventionpercent change in osteoprogenitor cells (Mean)
Teriparatide0.0000242
Alendronate0.0000104
Calcium and Vitamin D-0.0000068

[back to top]

Radiologic Evidence of Healing

Number of participants with persistence of alignment as determined by a radiologist. (NCT01705587)
Timeframe: at 10 weeks for immediate teriparatide group

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Immediate Teriparatide5
Delayed Teriparatide4

[back to top]

Increased Bone Density

Percent change in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) as assessed by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the spine, contralateral hip, distal 1/3 radius, and femoral neck (NCT01705587)
Timeframe: at 6 and 12 months

,
Interventionpercentage change in BMD (Mean)
Spine-PA (6 months)Spine-PA (12 months)Total Hip (6 months)Total Hip (12 months)Femoral Neck (6 months)Femoral Neck (12 months)Distal 1/3 Radius (6 months)Distal 1/3 Radius (12 months)
Delayed Teriparatide-0.65.4-0.81.5-2.7-1.9-0.7-6.1
Immediate Teriparatide2.12.8-1.6-0.3-1.8-2.5-0.6-1.9

[back to top]

Quality of Life Improvements

Assessed by quality of life questionnaire (SF-36). There are 8 subscales each ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life. (NCT01705587)
Timeframe: at 12 months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Physical functioningPhysical health limitationsEmotional health limitationsEnergy/FatigueEmotional well-beingSocial functioningPainGeneral health
Delayed Teriparatide65.068.872.959.470.065.659.467.2
Immediate Teriparatide49.348.275.054.580.792.972.966.1

[back to top]

Radiologic Evidence of Bone Healing

The radiologic indices of fracture healing included (1) cortical continuity on two of four cortices, (2) persistence of alignment, (3) decreased conspicuity of fracture line, and (4) increased callus formation. For each of these indices, healing was graded on a scale of 1 to 4 with 1 = no change (less than 25%), 2 = minimum healing (25-50%), 3 = moderate healing (50-75%), and 4 = complete healing (greater than 75%). A composite score was calculated by summing the subscale scores for the 4 indices. Composite score scale ranged from 4 to 16 with higher scores indicating more complete healing. The primary grading was performed by a radiologist with expertise in musculoskeletal radiology, then independently repeated by a second radiologist, both of whom were blinded to the study allocation. (NCT01705587)
Timeframe: 6, 12 months of treatment

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
6 mo12 mo
Delayed Teriparatide11.213.2
Immediate Teriparatide12.615.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 24 Months Endpoint in the European Quality of Life Questionnaire [EQ-5D-5L] (US)

The EQ-5D-5L is a generic, multidimensional, health-related, quality-of-life instrument completed on five dimensions to measure health-related quality of life. The profile allowed participants to rate their health state in five health domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression using a five level scale (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and unable to/extreme problems). The responses are used to derive the health state index scores using the United States (US) cross walk algorithm, with scores ranging from -0.11 to 1.0. A higher score indicates better health state. (NCT01709110)
Timeframe: Baseline, 24 Months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline24 Months
Risedronate0.720.76
Teriparatide0.700.74

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Major Non-Vertebral Fragility Fractures

A major non-vertebral fracture is a fracture at any of the following non-vertebral sites hip, radius, humerus, ribs, pelvis, tibia and femur. Non-vertebral fractures were determined by direct questioning at each visit, and confirmed by the site investigators by x-ray, radiology or surgical report. Fractures resulting from a severe trauma such as a traffic collision, a beating, or having been struck by a falling or moving. (NCT01709110)
Timeframe: Baseline through 24 Months

InterventionParticipants (with at least one event) (Number)
Teriparatide18
Risedronate31

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With New Moderate and/or Severe Vertebral Fractures

Vertebrae were graded as moderate (SQ2), or severe (SQ3) fractures, based on ~25 to 40% (moderate) or ~40% or more (severe) decrease in anterior, central, or posterior vertebral height (T4 through L4). (NCT01709110)
Timeframe: Baseline through 24 Months

InterventionParticipants (with at least one event) (Number)
Teriparatide26
Risedronate63

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With New Multiple (2 or More) Vertebral Fractures

(NCT01709110)
Timeframe: Baseline through 24 Months

InterventionParticipants (with at least one event) (Number)
Teriparatide2
Risedronate12

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With New Vertebral Fractures

"The incidence of new vertebral fractures was assessed by quantitative vertebral morphometry measurements (QM) with qualitative visual semiquantitative grading (SQ) confirmation.~A new vertebral fracture was diagnosed in a vertebra that was non-fractured at the baseline radiological examination. It was defined as a loss of vertebral body height of at least 20% and 4 mm from the baseline radiograph by vertebral QM, based upon placement of six points by a trained, central reader. Any fractures identified by QM were confirmed using SQ: if the vertebral body also had an increase of one or more severity grade, it was considered an incident vertebral fracture." (NCT01709110)
Timeframe: Baseline through 24 Months

InterventionParticipants (with at least one event) (Number)
Teriparatide28
Risedronate64

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Non-Vertebral Fragility Fractures

A non-vertebral fracture is a fracture at any of the following non-vertebral sites: clavicle, scapula, ribs, sternum, sacrum, coccyx, humerus, radius, ulna, carpus, pelvis, hip, femur, patella, tibia, fibula, ankle, calcaneus, tarsus, and metatarsal. Non-vertebral fractures were determined by direct questioning at each visit, and confirmed by the site investigators by x-ray, radiology or surgical report. Fractures resulting from a severe trauma such as a traffic collision, a beating, or having been struck by a falling or moving object were not considered fragility fractures but traumatic fractures. (NCT01709110)
Timeframe: Baseline through 24 Months

InterventionParticipants (with at least one event) (Number)
Teriparatide25
Risedronate38

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Pooled Clinical Vertebral and Non-Vertebral Fragility Fractures

"A clinical vertebral fracture was defined as a new or worsening vertebral fracture, confirmed by radiography, that was associated with signs and symptoms highly suggestive of a vertebral fracture.~All non-vertebral fractures that occurred and were diagnosed between visits required the confirmation by the site investigators after evaluating the original x-ray film(s), the radiology or surgical report. For clinical vertebral fractures, the final confirmation of the diagnosis required the centralized evaluation by a trained, independent reader." (NCT01709110)
Timeframe: Baseline through 24 Months

InterventionParticipants (with at least one event) (Number)
Teriparatide30
Risedronate61

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Pooled Fragility and Traumatic Non-Vertebral Fractures

Traumatic fractures were considered if resulting from a severe trauma such as a traffic collision, a beating, or having been struck by a falling or moving object. (NCT01709110)
Timeframe: Baseline through 24 Months

InterventionParticipants (with at least one event) (Number)
Teriparatide40
Risedronate57

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Pooled New and Worsening Vertebral Fractures

Worsening of a pre-existing fracture was considered if the decrease in vertebral height was at least one severity grade in the semi-quantitative assessment, confirmed by a trained central reader, where vertebrae were graded as normal (SQ0) or as with mild (SQ1), moderate (SQ2), or severe (SQ3) fractures, defined as ~20 to 25% (mild), ~25 to 40% (moderate) or ~40% or more (severe) decrease in anterior, central, or posterior vertebral height (T4 to L4). (NCT01709110)
Timeframe: Baseline through 24 Months

InterventionParticipants (with at least one event) (Number)
Teriparatide31
Risedronate69

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 24 Months Endpoint in Back Pain Using an 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale

Participants rated the worst back pain during the 24 hours preceding the visit at baseline and each post-baseline visit. An 11-point numerical back pain rating scale (rated from 0 = no back pain to 10 = worst possible back pain) was used. (NCT01709110)
Timeframe: Baseline, 24 Months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline24 Months
Risedronate4.53.4
Teriparatide4.53.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 24 Months Endpoint in Height

(NCT01709110)
Timeframe: Baseline, 24 Months

,
InterventionCentimeter (cm) (Mean)
Baseline24 Months
Risedronate155.0154.5
Teriparatide154.7154.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 24 Months Endpoint in the European Quality of Life Questionnaire [EQ-5D-5L] (UK)

The EQ-5D-5L is a generic, multidimensional, health-related, quality-of-life instrument completed on five dimensions to measure health-related quality of life. The profile allowed participants to rate their health state in five health domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression using a five level scale (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and unable to/extreme problems). The responses are used to derive the health state index scores using the United Kingdom (UK) algorithm, with scores ranging from -0.59 to 1.0. A higher score indicates better health state. (NCT01709110)
Timeframe: Baseline, 24 Months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline24 Months
Risedronate0.620.68
Teriparatide0.590.65

[back to top]

Bone Turnover Marker (Blood Sample)

The primary outcome was the between-group difference in the teriparatide-induced change in serum c-telopeptide from baseline to week 8. (NCT01750086)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionpercentage of change in CTX (Mean)
Denosumab 60mg Subcutaneous Injection-7
Alendronate 70mg Weekly x 8 Weeks43

[back to top]

Percentage of Eroded Surface/Bone Surface (ES/BS) in the CC, EC and IC of the Iliac Crest

ES/BS is the fraction of the entire trabecular surface occupied by resorption bays, including both those with and without osteoclasts. It is an indicator of bone resorption. Percentage = (ES/BS) *100. (NCT01753856)
Timeframe: 3 months post first dose of study drug

,
Interventionpercentage of BS (Median)
CC (n=31, 35)EC (n=30, 35)IC (n=30, 35)
Denosumab1.521.651.27
Teriparatide3.733.7911.19

[back to top]

Percentage of Mineralizing Surface With Remodeling-Based Formation and Modeling-Based Formation in the CC, EC and PC of the Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies

"The percentage of mineralizing surface where post-treatment DLs in the CC, EC, and PC were classified as remodeling-based or modeling based bone formation based on collagen fiber orientation and whether the underlying reversal line was scalloped or smooth.~Percentage = percentage remodeling- or modeling-based formation units * MS/BS" (NCT01753856)
Timeframe: 3 months post first dose of study drug

,
Interventionpercentage of the total formation unit (Median)
Remodeling-Based Bone Formation in CC (n=31, 35)Modeling-Based Bone Formation in CC (n=31, 35)Remodeling-Based Bone Formation in EC (n=30, 35)Modeling-Based Bone Formation in EC (n=30, 35)Remodeling-Based Bone Formation in PC (n=30, 35)Modeling-Based Bone Formation in PC (n=30, 35)
Denosumab0.870.095.420.000.000.00
Teriparatide16.672.0632.926.580.004.69

[back to top]

Percentage of Osteoid Surface (OS)/Bone Surface (BS) in the CC, EC and IC of the Iliac Crest

OS is the percentage of the entire trabecular BS that is covered by osteoid. Percentage = (OS / BS) *100. (NCT01753856)
Timeframe: 3 months post first dose of study drug

,
Interventionpercentage of BS (Median)
CC (n=31, 35)EC (n=30, 35)IC (n=30, 35)
Denosumab3.466.954.34
Teriparatide20.5130.8517.81

[back to top]

Percentage of Overfilled Remodeling Sites in the CC, EC and PC of the Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies

The percentage of overfilled remodeling sites in the CC, EC, and PC were defined as the percentage of observed remodeling units in which the second DL (TET) extended beyond the limits of the scalloped reversal line and into the adjacent, previously unresorbed surface of the bone. Percentage = (overfilled remodeling bone formation unit / total bone formation unit) * 100. (NCT01753856)
Timeframe: 3 months post first dose of study drug

,
Interventionpercentage of overfilled remodeling site (Median)
CC (n=31, 32)EC (n=30, 29)PC (n=29, 5)
Denosumab0.000.000.00
Teriparatide17.7421.980.00

[back to top]

Percentage of Single or Double Tetracycline Labels Per Bone Surface (sLS/BS or dLS/BS) in the CC, EC, IC and PC of the Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies

At baseline (18 days prior to randomization / study drug administration), DEM was administered. 22 days prior to the biopsy procedure (biopsy obtained 3 months post first dose of study drug), TET was administered. New bone in the biopsy was seen as the amount of bone between the 2 fluorescently DEM- or TET-labeled lines under a microscope. A DL indicated active bone formation and a SL or NL suggested suppression of bone formation. Percentage = (Single or double TET labels / BS) *100. (NCT01753856)
Timeframe: 3 months post first dose of study drug

,
Interventionpercentage of TET label (Median)
sLS/BS, in CC (n=31, 35)dLS/BS, in CC (n=31, 35)sLS/BS, in EC (n=30, 35)dLS/BS, in EC (n=30, 35)sLS/BS, in IC (n=30, 35)dLS/BS, in IC (n=30, 35)sLS/BS, in PC (n=30, 35)dLS/BS, in PC (n=30, 35)
Denosumab1.280.227.181.684.660.830.000.00
Teriparatide15.4410.4424.2428.8415.2814.969.370.00

[back to top]

Wall Thickness (W.Th) in the CC, EC and IC of the Iliac Crest

W.Th is the distance from the cement line to the marrow space of completed trabecular bone packets. (NCT01753856)
Timeframe: 3 months post first dose of study drug

,
Interventionµm (Median)
CC (n=31, 35)EC (n=30, 35)IC (n=30, 35)
Denosumab24.0330.0837.80
Teriparatide26.2931.8838.25

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 3 Months in Mineralizing Surface (MS) /Bone Surface (BS) in the Cancellous Compartment (CC) of the Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies

MS /BS is a measure of the proportion of BS on which new mineralized bone is deposited at the time of DEM or TET labeling, and calculated as the sum of the total extent of double label (DL) plus half the extent of single label (SL) divided by BS. At baseline (18 days prior to randomization / study drug administration), DEM was administered (3 days on, 12 days off, 3 days on). 22 days prior to the biopsy procedure (biopsy obtained 3 months post first dose of study drug), TET was administered (same dosing schedule as DEM). Both DEM and TET temporarily bind to new bone and fluoresce under UV light. New bone in the biopsy was seen as the amount of bone between the 2 fluorescently DEM- or TET-labeled lines under a microscope. A DL indicated active bone formation and a SL or no label (NL) suggested varying degrees of suppression of bone formation. (NCT01753856)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months post first dose of study drug

Interventionpercentage of BS (Median)
Teriparatide12.43
Denosumab-2.51

[back to top]

Percentage of Osteoid Volume (OV)/Bone Volume (BV) in the CC of the Iliac Crest

OV is the percentage of a given volume of bone tissue that consists of new unmineralized bone matrix (osteoid). Percentage = (OV/BV) *100. (NCT01753856)
Timeframe: 3 months post first dose of study drug

Interventionpercentage of BV (Median)
Teriparatide2.58
Denosumab0.39

[back to top]

Activation Frequency (Ac.f) in the CC, EC and IC of the Iliac Crest

Ac.f is the probability of new remodeling cycles initiated on the BS per year. Ac.f = (BFR/BS) / wall thickness. At baseline (18 days prior to randomization / study drug administration), DEM was administered. 22 days prior to the biopsy procedure (biopsy obtained 3 months post first dose of study drug), TET was administered. New bone in the biopsy was seen as the amount of bone between the 2 fluorescently DEM- or TET-labeled lines under a microscope. A DL indicated active bone formation and a SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. SL cases were imputed to a value of 0.3 µm/day or counted as missing. NL cases were assigned a value of zero. (NCT01753856)
Timeframe: 3 months post first dose of study drug

,
Interventionnew cycles per year (Median)
DL Only, in CC (n=31, 26)DL and Imputed SL, in CC (n=31, 35)DL Only, in EC (n=30, 29)DL and Imputed SL, in EC (n=30, 35)DL Only, in IC (n=30, 25)DL and Imputed SL, in IC (n=30, 35)
Denosumab0.100.060.350.340.170.12
Teriparatide1.411.412.772.771.881.88

[back to top]

Adjusted Apposition Rate (Aj.AR) in the CC, EC and IC of the Iliac Crest

Aj.AR is MAR averaged over the entire osteoid surface and in a steady state is an estimate of the mean rate of matrix apposition. At baseline (18 days prior to randomization / study drug administration), DEM was administered. 22 days prior to the biopsy procedure (biopsy obtained 3 months post first dose of study drug), TET was administered. New bone in the biopsy was seen as the amount of bone between the 2 fluorescently DEM- or TET-labeled lines under a microscope. A DL indicated active bone formation and a SL or NL suggested suppression of bone formation. BFR = MAR * (MS/BS). SL cases were imputed to a value of 0.3 µm/day or counted as missing. NL cases were counted as missing. (NCT01753856)
Timeframe: 3 months post first dose of study drug

,
Interventionµm/day (Median)
DL Only, in CC (n=31, 24)DL and Imputed SL, in CC (n=31, 33)DL Only, in EC (n=30, 25)DL and Imputed SL, in EC (n=30, 30)DL Only, in IC (n=30, 24)DL and Imputed SL, in IC (n=30, 33)
Denosumab0.210.140.650.580.580.35
Teriparatide0.580.580.760.761.031.03

[back to top]

Average Length of DLs in the CC, EC, IC and PC of the Iliac Crest

The length of TET DLs is a measure of the extent of bone formation in each compartment within individual remodeling units and is measured in mm. At baseline (18 days prior to randomization / study drug administration), DEM was administered. 22 days prior to the biopsy procedure (biopsy obtained 3 months post first dose of study drug), TET was administered. New bone in the biopsy was seen as the amount of bone between the 2 fluorescently DEM- or TET-labeled lines under a microscope. A DL indicated active bone formation. (NCT01753856)
Timeframe: 3 months post first dose of study drug

,
Interventionmm (Mean)
DL, in CC (n=31, 24)DL, in EC (n=30, 25)DL, in IC (n=30, 24)DL, in PC (n=10, 1)
Denosumab0.310.350.270.32
Teriparatide0.400.480.430.38

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 3 Months in Bone Formation Rate/Bone Surface (BFR/BS ) in the CC, EC, IC and PC of the Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies

BFR/BS is the volume of mineralized bone formed per unit surface of bone per unit of time [mm cubed per mm squared per year (mm³/mm²/year)]. At baseline (18 days prior to randomization / study drug administration), DEM was administered. 22 days prior to the biopsy procedure (biopsy obtained 3 months post first dose of study drug), TET was administered. New bone in the biopsy was seen as the amount of bone between the 2 fluorescently DEM- or TET-labeled lines under a microscope. A DL indicates active bone formation, a SL or NL suggests suppression of bone formation. BFR = MAR * (MS/BS). SL cases were imputed to a value of 0.3 mcm/day or counted as missing. NL cases were assigned a value of zero. (NCT01753856)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months post first dose of study drug

,
Interventionmm³/mm²/year (Median)
DL Only, in CC (n=30, 26)DL and Imputed SL, in CC (n=31, 35)DL Only, in EC (n=29, 28)DL and Imputed SL, in EC (n=30, 35)DL Only, in IC (n=30, 25)DL and Imputed SL, in IC (n=30, 35)DL Only, in PC (n=6, 16)DL and Imputed SL, in PC (n=30, 35)
Denosumab-0.0056-0.0055-0.0069-0.0069-0.0184-0.01840.0000-0.0005
Teriparatide0.02800.02750.05090.05010.04550.04550.02310.0015

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 3 Months in Label Length Within Each Basic Multicellular Unit (BMU) in the CC, EC, IC and PC of the Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies

BMUs are local groups of osteoblasts and osteoclasts that act in concert to complete a single remodeling cycle. The label length is a measure of the extent of the mineralization front within each BMU in the CC, EC, IC and PC. At baseline (18 days prior to randomization / study drug administration), DEM was administered. 22 days prior to the biopsy procedure (biopsy obtained 3 months post first dose of study drug), TET was administered. New bone in the biopsy was seen as the amount of bone between the 2 fluorescently DEM- or TET-labeled lines under a microscope. A DL indicated active bone formation, and a SL or NL suggested suppression of bone formation. (NCT01753856)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months post first dose of study drug

,
Interventionmillimeters (mm) (Median)
CC (n=30, 24)EC (n=28, 25)IC (n=30, 24)PC (n=4, 1)
Denosumab0.050.030.020.10
Teriparatide0.190.250.180.12

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 3 Months in Mineral Apposition Rate (MAR) in the CC, EC, IC and PC of the Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies

MAR is a measure of the linear rate of production of mineralized bone matrix by osteoblasts and is measured by the mean distance between 2 consecutive labels divided by the time interval. At baseline (18 days prior to randomization / study drug administration), DEM was administered. 22 days prior to the biopsy procedure (biopsy obtained 3 months post first dose of study drug), TET was administered. New bone in the biopsy was seen as the amount of bone between the 2 fluorescently DEM- or TET-labeled lines under a microscope. A DL indicated active bone formation, and a SL or NL suggested suppression of bone formation. SL cases were imputed to a value of 0.3 micrometers per day (µm/day) or counted as missing. NL cases were reported as missing. (NCT01753856)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months post first dose of study drug

,
Interventionmcm/day (Median)
DL Only, in CC (n=30, 24)DL and Imputed SL, in CC (n=31, 33)DL Only, in EC (n=28, 25)DL and Imputed SL, in EC (n=29, 31)DL Only, in IC (n=30, 24)DL and Imputed SL, in IC (n=30, 34)DL Only, in PC (n=4, 1)DL and Imputed SL, in PC (n=19, 4)
Denosumab-0.04-0.06-0.07-0.09-0.18-0.22-0.04-0.04
Teriparatide0.000.010.030.030.200.200.050.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 3 Months in MS/BS in the Endocortical Compartment (EC), Intracortical Compartment (IC), and Periosteal Compartment (PC) of the Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies

MS /BS is a measure of the proportion of BS on which new mineralized bone is deposited at the time of DEM or TET labeling and is calculated as the sum of the total extent of DL plus half the extent of SL divided by BS. At baseline (18 days prior to randomization / study drug administration), DEM was administered (3 days on, 12 days off, 3 days on). 22 days prior to the biopsy procedure (biopsy obtained 3 months post first dose of study drug), TET was administered (same dosing schedule as DEM). Both DEM and TET temporarily bind to new bone and fluoresce under UV light. New bone in the biopsy was seen as the amount of bone between the 2 fluorescently DEM- or TET-labeled lines under a microscope. A DL indicated active bone formation and a SL or NL suggested varying degrees of suppression of bone formation. (NCT01753856)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 months post first dose of study drug

,
Interventionpercentage of BS (Median)
ECICPC
Denosumab-2.97-6.70-0.39
Teriparatide26.129.392.40

[back to top]

MS/BS in the CC, EC, IC and PC of the Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies 3 Months Post First Dose of Study Drug

MS /BS is a measure of the proportion of BS on which new mineralized bone is deposited at the time of DEM or TET labeling and is calculated as the sum of the total extent of DL plus half the extent of SL divided by BS. At baseline (18 days prior to randomization / study drug administration), DEM was administered (3 days on, 12 days off, 3 days on). 22 days prior to the biopsy procedure (biopsy obtained 3 months post first dose of study drug), TET was administered (same dosing schedule as DEM). Both DEM and TET temporarily bind to new bone and fluoresce under UV light. New bone in the biopsy was seen as the amount of bone between the 2 fluorescently DEM- or TET-labeled lines under a microscope. A DL indicated active bone formation and a SL or NL suggested varying degrees of suppression of bone formation. (NCT01753856)
Timeframe: 3 months post first dose of study drug

,
Interventionpercentage of BS (Median)
CC (n=31, 35)EC (n=30, 35)IC (n=30, 35)PC (n=30, 35)
Denosumab0.965.423.050.00
Teriparatide18.7339.5021.694.69

[back to top]

Number of Samples With Single or Double Tetracycline Labels, SL and DL, or No Tetracycline Labels in the CC, Endocortical Compartment (EC), Intracortical Compartment (IC) and Periosteal Compartment (PC) of the Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies

(NCT01753856)
Timeframe: 3 months post first dose of study drug

,
InterventionSamples (Number)
DL and SL, in CC (n=31, 35)DL Only, in CC (n=31, 35)SL Only, in CC (n=31, 35)No Label, in CC (n=31, 35)DL and SL, in EC (n=30, 35)DL Only, in EC (n=30, 35)SL Only, in EC (n=30, 35)No Label, in EC (n=30, 35)DL and SL, in IC (n=30, 35)DL Only, in IC (n=30, 35)SL Only, in IC (n=30, 35)No Label, in IC (n=30, 35)DL and SL, in PC (n=30, 35)DL Only, in PC (n=30, 35)SL Only, in PC (n=30, 35)No Label, in PC (n=30, 35)
Denosumab240922506424010110430
Teriparatide310003000030000100191

[back to top]

Osteoid Thickness (O.Th) in the CC, EC and IC of the Iliac Crest

O.Th is a measure of the average thickness of osteoid seams. (NCT01753856)
Timeframe: 3 months post first dose of study drug

,
Interventionmicrometers (mcm) (Median)
CC (n= 31, 35)EC (n= 30, 35)IC (n= 30, 35)
Denosumab3.784.334.68
Teriparatide6.126.997.08

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 Months in Intact Parathyroid Hormone (PTH)

PTH regulates calcium and phosphate metabolism in bone and kidney, and is typically measured in serum using the intact PTH assay. Percentage = (PTH value at specified time points - PTH value at baseline) / PTH value at baseline * 100. (NCT01753856)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months post first dose of study drug

,
Interventionpercentage change in PTH (Median)
1 month (n=28, 34)3 months (n=18, 28)6 months (n=27, 33)
Denosumab72.2446.6830.40
Teriparatide-26.89-32.16-40.18

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 Months in Serum Carboxyterminal Cross-Linking Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTX)

CTX is a marker of bone turnover and is a measure of bone resorption. Percentage = (CTX value at specified time points - CTX value at baseline) / (CTX value at baseline) * 100. (NCT01753856)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months post first dose of study drug

,
Interventionpercentage change in CTX (Median)
1 month (n=31, 33)3 months (n=21, 29)6 months (n=29, 33)
Denosumab-90.70-90.77-82.50
Teriparatide6.0973.0489.13

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 Months in Serum Osteocalcin

Osteocalcin is a marker of bone turnover and a measure of osteoblast function. Percentage = (osteocalcin value at specified time points - osteocalcin value at baseline) / (osteocalcin value at baseline) * 100. (NCT01753856)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months post first dose of study drug

,
Interventionpercentage change in osteocalcin (Median)
1 month (n=31, 33)3 months (n=20, 29)6 months (n=29, 31)
Denosumab-6.56-45.70-50.53
Teriparatide90.53123.66187.29

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 Months in Serum Procollagen Type I N-terminal Propeptide (P1NP)

P1NP is a marker of bone turnover and is a measure of bone formation. Percentage = (P1NP value at specified time points - P1NP value at baseline) / P1NP value at baseline * 100. (NCT01753856)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months post first dose of study drug

,
Interventionpercentage change in P1NP (Median)
1 month (n=33, 34)3 months (n=22, 29)6 months (n=31, 32)
Denosumab-11.56-66.64-68.24
Teriparatide134.38213.15284.22

[back to top]

Percentage of Bone With Remodeling-Based and Modeling-Based Formations in the CC, EC and PC of the Iliac Crest Bone Biopsies

In this study, post-treatment DLs in the CC, EC, and PC were classified as remodeling-based or modeling-based bone formations which was determined by whether the underlying reversal line was scalloped or smooth and by the collagen fiber orientation. Percentage = (remodeling-based formation units or modeling-based formation units/ total bone formation units) * 100. (NCT01753856)
Timeframe: 3 months post first dose of study drug

,
Interventionpercentage of the total formation unit (Median)
Remodeling-Based Bone Formation in CC (n=31, 32)Modeling-Based Bone Formation in CC (n=31, 32)Remodeling-Based Bone Formation in EC (n=30, 29)Modeling-Based Bone Formation in EC (n=30, 29)Remodeling-Based Bone Formation in PC (n=29, 5)Modeling-Based Bone Formation in PC (n=29, 5)
Denosumab90.839.17100.000.000.00100.00
Teriparatide89.0210.9883.3316.670.00100.0

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Integral BMD by QCT at the Total Hip at Month 6

Integral BMD was measured by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) at the total hip. (NCT01796301)
Timeframe: Baseline and month 6

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide-0.8
Romosozumab2.3

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 12

Bone mineral density was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). (NCT01796301)
Timeframe: Baseline and month 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide5.4
Romosozumab9.8

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 6

Bone mineral density was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). (NCT01796301)
Timeframe: Baseline and month 6

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide3.5
Romosozumab7.2

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD at Month 6

Bone mineral density was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). (NCT01796301)
Timeframe: Baseline and month 6

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide-1.1
Romosozumab2.1

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip BMD at Month 6

Bone mineral density was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). (NCT01796301)
Timeframe: Baseline and month 6

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide-0.8
Romosozumab2.3

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip Integral Bone Mineral Content (BMC) by QCT at Month 12

Total hip integral BMC was measured using quantitative computed tomography (QCT). (NCT01796301)
Timeframe: Baseline and month 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide0.0
Romosozumab3.6

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip Integral Bone Mineral Content (BMC) by QCT at Month 6

Total hip integral BMC was measured using quantitative computed tomography (QCT). (NCT01796301)
Timeframe: Baseline and month 6

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide-0.7
Romosozumab2.4

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline Through Month 12 in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD)

Bone mineral density was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Percent change from baseline through month 12 is the average of the treatment effect at months 6 and 12. (NCT01796301)
Timeframe: Baseline, month 6 and month 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide-0.6
Romosozumab2.6

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Integral BMD by QCT at the Total Hip at Month 12

Integral BMD was measured by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) at the total hip. (NCT01796301)
Timeframe: Baseline and month 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide-0.2
Romosozumab3.4

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip BMD at Month 12

Bone mineral density was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). (NCT01796301)
Timeframe: Baseline and month 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide-0.5
Romosozumab2.9

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Cortical BMD by Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) at the Total Hip at Month 6

Cortical BMD was measured by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) at the total hip. (NCT01796301)
Timeframe: Baseline and month 6

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide-2.7
Romosozumab0.7

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Estimated Strength at the Total Hip at Month 12

Total hip estimated strength was assessed by finite element analysis (FEA) of QCT scans. (NCT01796301)
Timeframe: Baseline and month 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide-0.7
Romosozumab2.5

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Cortical BMD by QCT at the Total Hip at Month 12

Cortical BMD was measured by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) at the total hip. (NCT01796301)
Timeframe: Baseline and month 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide-3.6
Romosozumab1.1

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Estimated Strength at the Total Hip at Month 6

Total hip estimated strength was assessed by finite element analysis (FEA) of QCT scans. (NCT01796301)
Timeframe: Baseline and month 6

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide-1.0
Romosozumab2.1

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD at Month 12

Bone mineral density was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). (NCT01796301)
Timeframe: Baseline and month 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Teriparatide-0.2
Romosozumab3.2

[back to top]

SUV Max on PET/CT Scan at 12 Months

F18 PET/CT scan of foot was performed at baseline and at 12 months following intervention. Main outcome measure was Standardised Uptake value (SUV max) with intervention. A higher score on the scale suggest better outcome (NCT02023411)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventiong/ml (Mean)
Teriparatide26.1
Placebo22.9

[back to top]

Clinical Events

"Any of the following will be taken as a secondary end point:~The number of participants with~new onset fracture~new onset/progression of deformity~amputation" (NCT02023411)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Teriparatide0
Placebo0

[back to top]

Bone Mineral Density (BMD) by DXA at Femoral Neck

"The mean percent change in BMD of the femoral neck after 24 months of treatment. Arms/Groups (3) below are divided into the Arms/Groups these subjects were in the parent protocol (NCT01225055) for the 12 month duration of this previous study. These subjects were then enrolled in this 12 month extension study (NCT02025179) and all received Teriparatide and vibration for 12 months as described in the protocol section. The Baseline refers to the baseline at the parent protocol (NCT01225055). The 24 months refers to period after the completion of the 12 month parent protocol (NCT01225055) and this 12 month extension study (NCT02025179)." (NCT02025179)
Timeframe: Baseline to 24 Months

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Teriparatide2.73
Vibration-0.06
Teriparatide and Vibration4.71

[back to top]

Bone Mineral Density (BMD) by DXA at the Lumbar Spine

"The mean percent change in BMD at the lumbar spine from baseline after 24 months of treatment. Arms/Groups (3) below are divided into the Arms/Groups these subjects were in the parent protocol (NCT01225055) for the 12 month duration of this previous study. These subjects were then enrolled in this 12 month extension study (NCT02025179) and all received Teriparatide and vibration for 12 months as described in the protocol section. The Baseline refers to the baseline at the parent protocol (NCT01225055). The 24 months refers to period after the completion of the 12 month parent protocol (NCT01225055) and this 12 month extension study (NCT02025179)." (NCT02025179)
Timeframe: Baseline to 24 Months

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Teriparatide14.4
Vibration7.05
Teriparatide and Vibration8.98

[back to top]

Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the Total Hip as Assessed by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA)

"The mean percent change in BMD of the total hip after 24 months of treatment. Arms/Groups (3) below are divided into the Arms/Groups these subjects were in the parent protocol (NCT01225055) for the 12 month duration of this previous study. These subjects were then enrolled in this 12 month extension study (NCT02025179) and all received Teriparatide and vibration for 12 months as described in the protocol section. The Baseline refers to the baseline at the parent protocol (NCT01225055). The 24 months refers to period after the completion of the 12 month parent protocol (NCT01225055) and this 12 month extension study (NCT02025179)." (NCT02025179)
Timeframe: Baseline to 24 months

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Teriparatide6.73
Vibration-0.34
Teriparatide and Vibration4.24

[back to top]

Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase

"The mean percent change in Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase from baseline after 24 months of treatment. Arms/Groups (3) below are divided into the Arms/Groups these subjects were in the parent protocol (NCT01225055) for the 12 month duration of this previous study. These subjects were then enrolled in this 12 month extension study (NCT02025179) and all received Teriparatide and vibration for 12 months as described in the protocol section. The Baseline refers to the baseline at the parent protocol (NCT01225055). The 24 months refers to period after the completion of the 12 month parent protocol (NCT01225055) and this 12 month extension study (NCT02025179)." (NCT02025179)
Timeframe: Baseline to 24 Months

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Teriparatide11.5
Vibration12.6
Teriparatide and Vibration10.9

[back to top]

C-terminal Telopeptide

"The mean percent change in C-terminal telopeptide from baseline after 24 months of treatment. Arms/Groups (3) below are divided into the Arms/Groups these subjects were in the parent protocol (NCT01225055) for the 12 month duration of this previous study. These subjects were then enrolled in this 12 month extension study (NCT02025179) and all received Teriparatide and vibration for 12 months as described in the protocol section. The Baseline refers to the baseline at the parent protocol (NCT01225055). The 24 months refers to period after the completion of the 12 month parent protocol (NCT01225055) and this 12 month extension study (NCT02025179)." (NCT02025179)
Timeframe: Baseline to 24 Months

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Teriparatide-19.8
Vibration-14.8
Teriparatide and Vibration-2.12

[back to top]

Amino-terminal Propeptide of Type 1 Collagen

"The mean percent change in Amino-terminal of type 1 collagen from baseline after 24 months of treatment. Arms/Groups (3) below are divided into the Arms/Groups these subjects were in the parent protocol (NCT01225055) for the 12 month duration of this previous study. These subjects were then enrolled in this 12 month extension study (NCT02025179) and all received Teriparatide and vibration for 12 months as described in the protocol section. The Baseline refers to the baseline at the parent protocol (NCT01225055). The 24 months refers to period after the completion of the 12 month parent protocol (NCT01225055) and this 12 month extension study (NCT02025179)." (NCT02025179)
Timeframe: Baseline to 24 Months

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Teriparatide102
Vibration104
Teriparatide and Vibration58

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Spine Bone Mineral Density by Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA)

(NCT02176382)
Timeframe: Baseline and 42 months

Interventionpercent change in BMD (Mean)
Standard Dose Teriparatide7.69
High Dose Teriparatide12.70

[back to top]

Change in Serum Biochemical Bone Markers of Bone Activity - Parathyroid Hormone (PTH)

Bone markers of bone activity tracked over time for changes.1 Yr. Change in PTH (NCT02440581)
Timeframe: 1 Year (at baseline and one year)

Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
Control, Low Turnover89
Treatment, Low Turnover379
Control, High Turnover-125
Treatment, High Turnover-240

[back to top]

Change in Serum Biochemical Bone Markers of Bone Activity - Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP)

Bone markers of bone activity tracked over time for changes.1 Yr. Change in BSAP (NCT02440581)
Timeframe: 1 year (at baseline and one year)

Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
Control, Low Turnover.61
Treatment, Low Turnover-1.01
Control, High Turnover-8.92
Treatment, High Turnover-10.36

[back to top]

Change in Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) Bone Mineral Density of the Hip

At one year the investigators will asses bone mass using QCT of the total hip and compare one year changes in bone mass between the treatment and control groups. (NCT02440581)
Timeframe: One Year (at baseline and one year)

Interventiong/cm^3 (Mean)
Control, Low Turnover-10.71
Treatment, Low Turnover5.72
Control, High Turnover-3.52
Treatment, High Turnover.2

[back to top]

Change in Coronary Artery Calcifications by Multiple Detector Computed Tomography (MDCT)

At one year the investigators will asses differences between the treatment and control groups in changes in Coronary Artery Calcifications by MDCT. 1 Yr. Change in Sqrt CAC Vol. (NCT02440581)
Timeframe: One year (at baseline and one year)

InterventionHounsfield Unit (Mean)
Control, Low Turnover2.78
Treatment, Low Turnover4.48
Control, High Turnover4.97
Treatment, High Turnover3.47

[back to top]

Change in Serum Biochemical Bone Markers of Bone Activity - Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 (FGF23)

Bone markers of bone activity tracked over time for changes. 1 Yr. Change in FGF-23 (NCT02440581)
Timeframe: 1 Year (at baseline and 1 year)

Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
Control, Low Turnover985
Treatment, Low Turnover326
Control, High Turnover3337
Treatment, High Turnover607

[back to top]

Functional Outcome Using a Battery That Includes Walking Speed, Repeated Chair Stands, and Balance at 3 Months

More rapidly improved functional outcome using a short physical performance battery to assess lower extremity function (walking speed, repeated chair stands, and balance) at 3 months. Scale is 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better physical performance. (NCT02972424)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Teriparatide74.2
Placebo59.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Evidence of Cortical Bridging for Fracture Healing

Evidence of cortical bridging based on Focus CT, (NCT02972424)
Timeframe: 3 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Teriparatide9
Placebo8

[back to top]

Pain at 12 Months Based on the Numeric Rating Scale

Pain at 12 months as assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (0 to 10 where 0 means no pain and 10 worst pain) (NCT02972424)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Teriparatide1.5
Placebo1.9

[back to top]

Physical Function at 12 Months Using a Battery That Includes Walking Speed, Repeated Chair Stands, and Balance

More rapidly improved functional outcome using a short physical performance battery to assess lower extremity function (walking speed, repeated chair stands, and balance) at 12 months. Scale is 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better performance. (NCT02972424)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionscore on a scale 0-100 (Mean)
Teriparatide70.0
Placebo64.9

[back to top]

Change in Pain by Numeric Rating Scale Between Baseline and Three Months

"Leads to a faster reduction in pain as assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).~The mean reduction in pain score from 0 to 3 months is reported. Higher scores mean a greater reduction in pain." (NCT02972424)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Teriparatide1.94
Placebo2.78

[back to top]

Cancellous Bone Formation Rate at Month 3

"Cancellous bone formation rate at month 3 is calculated from the cancellous (trabecular) compartment of the iliac crest bone biopsy specimens.~Bone formation rate (BFR/BS, mm3/mm2/day): amount of new bone formed in unit time per unit of bone surface. It is calculated by multiplying the mineralizing surface/bone surface (MS/BS) by the mineral apposition rate (MAR) - see below for how MS/BS and MAR are calculated.~Mineralizing surface (MS/BS, %): is the percent of bone surface that displays a tetracycline label reflecting active mineralization. It is calculated as the double-labeled surface plus one half of the single-labeled surface and is expressed as a function of total bone surface. It is a measure of the proportion of bone surface upon which new mineralized bone was being deposited during the period of tetracycline labeling.~Mineral apposition rate (MAR mm/day): is the mean distance between the double labels, divided by the time interval between them." (NCT04026256)
Timeframe: 3 months after first dose of study drug

Interventionmm3/mm2/day (Mean)
Teriparatide Only0.13
Denosumab Only0.01
Denosumab and Teriparatide0.06

[back to top]