Page last updated: 2024-11-12

exenatide

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth

Description

Exenatide: A synthetic form of exendin-4, a 39-amino acid peptide isolated from the venom of the Gila monster lizard (Heloderma suspectum). Exenatide increases CYCLIC AMP levels in pancreatic acinar cells and acts as a GLUCAGON-LIKE PEPTIDE-1 RECEPTOR (GLP-1) agonist and incretin mimetic, enhancing insulin secretion in response to increased glucose levels; it also suppresses inappropriate glucagon secretion and slows gastric emptying. It is used an anti-diabetic and anti-obesity agent. [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID45588096
SCHEMBL ID14634818
MeSH IDM0199975
PubMed CID16157882
MeSH IDM0199975

Synonyms (34)

Synonym
bydureon
itca 650
exendin-4 ,
exenatide
exendin 4
ac 2993a
ac 2993
exendin 3 (heloderma horridum), 2-glycine-3-l-glutamic acid-
ac002993
ac2993a
bydureon pen
pt302
hsdb 7789
exenatide [usan:inn:ban:jan]
ly 2148568
9p1872d4ol ,
da 3091
unii-9p1872d4ol
AKOS015994651
HS-2012
Y-100006
exenatide; exendin-4
SCHEMBL14634818
c184h282n50o60s
(ser-39 = c-terminal amide)
HB3157
hgegtftsdlskqmeeeavrlfiewlknggpssgappps
itca-650
ac-2993lar
ac-002993
ac-2993a
da-3091
ly-2148568
exenatide free base

Research Excerpts

Toxicity

Exenatide treatment was generally well-tolerated and the incidence of severe adverse event was rare. The most frequent adverse events with exen atide and sitagliptin were nausea and diarrhoea.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" There were no serious adverse events and no patient withdrawals related to treatment."( Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of exenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Baron, AD; Fineman, MS; Kim, DD; Kolterman, OG; Nielsen, LL; Ruggles, JA; Shen, L, 2005
)
0.33
" Careful postmarketing surveillance for adverse effects, especially among the DPP4 inhibitors, and continued evaluation in longer-term studies and in clinical practice are required to determine the role of this new class among current pharmacotherapies for type 2 diabetes."( Efficacy and safety of incretin therapy in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Amori, RE; Lau, J; Pittas, AG, 2007
)
0.34
" This article reviews the profile of adverse effects for these agents in relation to their current (exenatide) and anticipated (liraglutide) role in the management of Type 2 diabetes."( Safety and adverse effects associated with GLP-1 analogues.
Bain, SC; Stephens, JW, 2007
)
0.34
" This was offset, however, by an exenatide discontinuation rate of 36%, primarily due to adverse gastrointestinal effects."( Safety and efficacy of exenatide in combination with insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Abelseth, JM; Bakst, G; Busch, RS; Hamilton, RA; Kane, MP; Sheffield, CA, 2008
)
0.35
" Nausea, generally mild-to-moderate, was the most common adverse event with exenatide (25% vs."( Efficacy and safety of exenatide in patients of Asian descent with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin or metformin and a sulphonylurea.
Brodows, R; Chuang, LM; Gao, Y; Jang, HC; Johns, D; Mohan, V; Ning, G; Northrup, J; Shah, S; Wu, TJ; Yoon, KH, 2009
)
0.35
" All adverse events were mild or moderate in severity."( Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, tolerability, and safety of exenatide in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
de la Peña, A; Fineman, M; Irie, S; Isaka, Y; Kothare, PA; Linnebjerg, H; Mace, K; Sakata, Y; Shigeta, H; Teng, CH; Uenaka, K; Yamamura, A; Yeo, KP, 2008
)
0.35
" Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) at any time during the study were observed in 40 and 47% of patients with positive and negative treatment-emergent antibodies, respectively."( The effect of exenatide re-exposure on safety and efficacy.
Braun, DK; Brodows, R; Burger, J; Faludi, P; Ivanyi, T, 2009
)
0.35
" No serious adverse events (AEs) were reported and no AEs led to study discontinuation in any group."( Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of exenatide once weekly in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.
Iwamoto, K; Kothare, PA; Linnebjerg, H; Mace, K; Nasu, R; Wolka, AM; Yamamura, A, 2009
)
0.35
" Nausea was the most common adverse event in placebo- and active-controlled trials."( Exenatide efficacy and safety: a systematic review.
Chan, BK; Lee, N; Norris, SL; Thakurta, S, 2009
)
0.35
"The objective was to investigate whether varying administration time of exenatide affects the magnitude of satiety responses, blood glucose, and adverse events in healthy volunteers."( Effect of administration time of exenatide on satiety responses, blood glucose, and adverse events in healthy volunteers.
Abouhassan, A; Ayar, C; Clarke, AW; Commissaris, RL; Jaber, LA; Jaber, NA; Jantz, A; Pinelli, NR; Smith, Z, 2011
)
0.37
" The most frequent adverse events with exenatide and sitagliptin were nausea (n=38, 24%, and n=16, 10%, respectively) and diarrhoea (n=29, 18%, and n=16, 10%, respectively); upper-respiratory-tract infection (n=17, 10%) and peripheral oedema (n=13, 8%) were the most frequent events with pioglitazone."( Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus sitagliptin or pioglitazone as an adjunct to metformin for treatment of type 2 diabetes (DURATION-2): a randomised trial.
Bergenstal, RM; Macconell, L; Malloy, J; Malone, J; Porter, LE; Walsh, B; Wilhelm, K; Wysham, C; Yan, P, 2010
)
0.36
" No hypoglycemia or serious adverse events were reported, and exenatide was generally well tolerated in both age groups."( Exenatide - pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability in patients ≥ 75 years of age with Type 2 diabetes.
Kothare, PA; Linnebjerg, H; Mitchell, MI; Seger, M; Wolka, AM, 2011
)
0.37
" HbA1c and weight changes, exenatide discontinuation, adverse events and treatment satisfaction were compared between non-insulin and insulin-treated patients."( Safety, efficacy and tolerability of exenatide in combination with insulin in the Association of British Clinical Diabetologists nationwide exenatide audit*.
Cull, ML; Jose, B; Mills, AP; Rigby, AS; Ryder, RE; Sathyapalan, T; Shafiq, W; Sukumar, N; Thong, KY; Walton, C, 2011
)
0.37
" Adverse events were statistically but probably not clinically significantly higher, but combination treatment was less well tolerated."( Safety, efficacy and tolerability of exenatide in combination with insulin in the Association of British Clinical Diabetologists nationwide exenatide audit*.
Cull, ML; Jose, B; Mills, AP; Rigby, AS; Ryder, RE; Sathyapalan, T; Shafiq, W; Sukumar, N; Thong, KY; Walton, C, 2011
)
0.37
" Customized primary major adverse CV events (MACE) included stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiac mortality, acute coronary syndrome, and revascularization procedures."( Cardiovascular safety of exenatide BID: an integrated analysis from controlled clinical trials in participants with type 2 diabetes.
Han, J; Hoogwerf, BJ; Nicewarner, D; Ratner, R; Shen, L; Yushmanova, I, 2011
)
0.37
" Exenatide once-weekly was generally well tolerated and adverse events were predominantly mild or moderate in intensity."( DURATION-2: efficacy and safety of switching from maximum daily sitagliptin or pioglitazone to once-weekly exenatide.
Bergenstal, R; Malloy, J; Malone, J; Taylor, K; Walsh, B; Wysham, C; Yan, P, 2011
)
0.37
"Therapeutic proteins/peptides can produce immunogenic responses that may increase the risk of adverse events or reduce efficacy."( Liraglutide treatment is associated with a low frequency and magnitude of antibody formation with no apparent impact on glycemic response or increased frequency of adverse events: results from the Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes (LEAD) trials.
Brett, JH; Buse, JB; Garber, A; Holst, J; Nauck, M; Rosenstock, J; Schmidt, WE; Videbæk, N, 2011
)
0.37
" Conversely, decreasing human IAPP release with diazoxide or somatostatin limited amyloid formation and its toxic effects."( Exendin-4 increases islet amyloid deposition but offsets the resultant beta cell toxicity in human islet amyloid polypeptide transgenic mouse islets.
Aston-Mourney, K; Hull, RL; Kahn, SE; Subramanian, SL; Udayasankar, J; Zraika, S, 2011
)
0.37
"IAPP release is necessary for islet amyloid formation and its toxic effects."( Exendin-4 increases islet amyloid deposition but offsets the resultant beta cell toxicity in human islet amyloid polypeptide transgenic mouse islets.
Aston-Mourney, K; Hull, RL; Kahn, SE; Subramanian, SL; Udayasankar, J; Zraika, S, 2011
)
0.37
"Although several classes of pharmacotherapy are available for type 2 diabetes, glycaemic control is often hampered by medication-related adverse effects and contraindications such as renal impairment."( The safety and tolerability of GLP-1 receptor agonists in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a review.
Aroda, VR; Ratner, R, 2011
)
0.37
" They provide lesser effect on PPG, similar reduction in body weight, and result in a potentially favorable adverse event profile compared with exenatide twice daily."( Efficacy and safety of long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists compared with exenatide twice daily and sitagliptin in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hurren, KM; Pinelli, NR, 2011
)
0.37
" Common adverse events were as follows: EQW, nausea (11."( Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus metformin, pioglitazone, and sitagliptin used as monotherapy in drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes (DURATION-4): a 26-week double-blind study.
Boardman, MK; Chan, M; Cuddihy, RM; González, JG; Hanefeld, M; Kumar, A; Russell-Jones, D; Wolka, AM, 2012
)
0.38
" GLP-1 agonists have been well tolerated, with the most common adverse effects being gastrointestinal related, which occurred early in therapy but typically resolved after 4-8 weeks."( Clinical efficacy and safety of once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists in development for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults.
Brackett, A; Harris, K; Tzefos, M, 2012
)
0.38
" Other than injection-site reactions, adverse event rates in antibody-positive and antibody-negative patients were similar."( Clinical relevance of anti-exenatide antibodies: safety, efficacy and cross-reactivity with long-term treatment.
Booker Porter, TK; Cirincione, BB; Darsow, T; Diamant, M; Fineman, MS; Kinninger, LA; Mace, KF; Trautmann, ME, 2012
)
0.38
" No serious adverse event was observed."( Effects of intravenous exenatide in type 2 diabetic patients with congestive heart failure: a double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial of efficacy and safety.
Frick, M; Hedman, A; Löfström, U; Nathanson, D; Nyström, T; Sjöholm, A; Ullman, B, 2012
)
0.38
" Gastrointestinal adverse effects and injection site reactions are common, but rarely lead to drug discontinuation."( Review of the safety and efficacy of exenatide once weekly for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Murphy, CE, 2012
)
0.38
" Between-group differences in adverse event (AE) and hypoglycaemia incidences were calculated."( Comparison of safety and tolerability with continuous (exenatide once weekly) or intermittent (exenatide twice daily) GLP-1 receptor agonism in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Han, J; MacConell, L; Moretto, T; Pencek, R; Porter, L; Ridge, T; Schulteis, C, 2012
)
0.38
"Both exenatide formulations were generally safe and well-tolerated, with ExQW associated with less nausea and vomiting but more injection-site AEs."( Comparison of safety and tolerability with continuous (exenatide once weekly) or intermittent (exenatide twice daily) GLP-1 receptor agonism in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Han, J; MacConell, L; Moretto, T; Pencek, R; Porter, L; Ridge, T; Schulteis, C, 2012
)
0.38
" The most common adverse events overall were nausea (38."( Exenatide twice daily: analysis of effectiveness and safety data stratified by age, sex, race, duration of diabetes, and body mass index.
Anderson, PW; Blickensderfer, A; Brunell, SC; Li, Y; Pencek, R, 2012
)
0.38
" Gastrointestinal events were the most common adverse events."( Exenatide twice daily: analysis of effectiveness and safety data stratified by age, sex, race, duration of diabetes, and body mass index.
Anderson, PW; Blickensderfer, A; Brunell, SC; Li, Y; Pencek, R, 2012
)
0.38
" This meta-analysis was aimed at evaluating the risk of those serious adverse events associated with GLP-1 agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes."( A meta-analysis of serious adverse events reported with exenatide and liraglutide: acute pancreatitis and cancer.
Alves, C; Batel-Marques, F; Macedo, AF, 2012
)
0.38
" These rare and long-term adverse events deserve properly monitoring in future studies evaluating GLP-1 agonists."( A meta-analysis of serious adverse events reported with exenatide and liraglutide: acute pancreatitis and cancer.
Alves, C; Batel-Marques, F; Macedo, AF, 2012
)
0.38
" The adverse event (AE) profile and effects on glycemic control have not been assessed for the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exenatide once weekly in combination with a thiazolidinedione (TZD) with or without metformin."( Safety of exenatide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with a thiazolidinedione alone or in combination with metformin for 2 years.
Boardman, MK; Haber, H; Liutkus, JF; Norwood, P; Pintilei, E; Trautmann, ME, 2012
)
0.38
" Gastrointestinal-related and injection site-related adverse events occurred more frequently with EQW than with detemir."( Once-weekly exenatide versus once- or twice-daily insulin detemir: randomized, open-label, clinical trial of efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin alone or in combination with sulfonylureas.
Adetunji, O; Davies, M; Heller, S; Sapin, H; Sreenan, S; Tahbaz, A; Vora, J, 2013
)
0.39
" was generally well tolerated, and the majority of adverse events reported were mild in severity."( Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of single- and multiple-dose exenatide once weekly in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Cui, YM; Guo, XH; Linnebjerg, H; Mace, K; Tang, CC; Tham, LS; Zhang, DM, 2013
)
0.39
" has a pharmacokinetic profile in this patient population similar to that observed in other ethnic and racial populations, and appears to be safe and generally well tolerated, with the potential to improve glycemic control and decrease body weight without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia."( Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of single- and multiple-dose exenatide once weekly in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Cui, YM; Guo, XH; Linnebjerg, H; Mace, K; Tang, CC; Tham, LS; Zhang, DM, 2013
)
0.39
"5%) placebo-treated patients reported one or more treatment-emergent adverse events; nausea was the most frequently reported side effect (exenatide, 4 [15."( Safety and efficacy of twice-daily exenatide in Taiwanese patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Chuang, LM; Lu, CH; Ni, E; Reed, V; Sheu, WH; Shih, KC; Wu, TJ; Yu, M, 2013
)
0.39
" Transient, mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal treatment-emergent adverse events and injection-site treatment-emergent adverse events were reported most frequently, but were seldom treatment limiting."( Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of exenatide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: an integrated analysis of the DURATION trials.
Dong, H; Griffin, P; Grimm, M; Han, J; Malloy, J; Schulteis, CT; Weaver, C, 2013
)
0.39
"Drugs are designed for therapy, but medication-related adverse events are common, and risk/benefit analysis is critical for determining clinical use."( Systems pharmacology of adverse event mitigation by drug combinations.
Azeloglu, EU; Badimon, JJ; Benard, L; Chen, Y; Giannarelli, C; Goldfarb, J; Gottesman, O; Hajjar, RJ; Iyengar, R; Nishimura, T; Zafar, MU; Zhao, S, 2013
)
0.39
" The most common gastrointestinal adverse events for dulaglutide were nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea."( Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide added onto pioglitazone and metformin versus exenatide in type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial (AWARD-1).
Arakaki, R; Atisso, C; Blevins, T; Colon, G; Garcia, P; Kuhstoss, D; Lakshmanan, M; Wysham, C, 2014
)
0.4
"Available evidence about safety, tolerability and potential adverse events relative to GLP-1Rx agonists presently used."( Potential side effects to GLP-1 agonists: understanding their safety and tolerability.
Consoli, A; Formoso, G, 2015
)
0.42
" Long-term safety data included adverse events, liver and renal function, and heart rate."( Five-year efficacy and safety data of exenatide once weekly: long-term results from the DURATION-1 randomized clinical trial.
Griffin, PS; MacConell, LA; Maggs, DG; Trautmann, ME; Wysham, CH; Zhou, M, 2015
)
0.42
" The main adverse effects of treatment included gastrointestinal and injection site reactions."( Efficacy and safety of once-weekly glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists for the management of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Athanasiadou, E; Bekiari, E; Boura, P; Karagiannis, T; Liakos, A; Mainou, M; Matthews, DR; Paschos, P; Rika, M; Tsapas, A; Vasilakou, D, 2015
)
0.42
"Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are increasingly being used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, but consideration of benefits and potential adverse events is required."( Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists for Type 2 Diabetes: A Clinical Update of Safety and Efficacy.
Drab, SR, 2016
)
0.43
" This meta-analysis revealed the use of dulaglutide as a monotherapy or an add-on to OAM and lispro appeared to be effective and safe for adults with T2DM."( Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
Tong, N; Zhang, L; Zhang, M; Zhang, Y, 2016
)
0.43
"Exenatide, metformin (MET), and biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIA30) have been widely used in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); however, each of these medications has significant adverse effects, which limit their utilization."( Phase III Study on Efficacy and Safety of Triple Combination (Exenatide/Metformin/Biphasic Insulin Aspart) Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Bai, Y; Ji, Z; Liu, Y; Lv, C; Su, K; Wang, H; Wang, Y,
)
0.13
"7%) were the most common adverse events."( Efficacy and Safety of Multiple Doses of Exenatide Once-Monthly Suspension in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Phase II Randomized Clinical Trial.
Hardy, E; MacConell, L; Wysham, CH, 2016
)
0.43
" Our main end-points were control of glycaemia, body weight, hypoglycaemia and gastrointestinal adverse events (AEs)."( Efficacy and safety of once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists compared with exenatide and liraglutide in type 2 diabetes: a systemic review of randomised controlled trials.
Liu, F; Ren, Z; Xue, X; Yang, Q; Zhang, A; Zhang, W, 2016
)
0.43
" The aim of this study was to assess the risk of adverse events (AEs) with GLP-1 RAs and their relation to dose, background medication and duration of action."( Occurrence of nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea reported as adverse events in clinical trials studying glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: A systematic analysis of published clinical trials.
Abd El Aziz, MS; Bettge, K; Kahle, M; Meier, JJ; Nauck, MA, 2017
)
0.46
"The RCTs in the present analysis show that all GLP-1RAs improve glycaemic control, reduce body weight and increase the risk of adverse gastrointestinal symptoms compared with placebo."( Efficacy and safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and mixed-treatment comparison analysis.
Davies, MJ; Htike, ZZ; Khunti, K; Papamargaritis, D; Webb, DR; Zaccardi, F, 2017
)
0.46
"To characterize gastrointestinal adverse events (AEs) with different glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs)."( Upper and/or lower gastrointestinal adverse events with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: Incidence and consequences.
Aroda, VR; Han, J; Hardy, E; Horowitz, M; Rayner, CK, 2017
)
0.46
" The most common adverse events with exenatide QWS-AI were gastrointestinal events and injection-site reactions."( Efficacy and safety of autoinjected exenatide once-weekly suspension versus sitagliptin or placebo with metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: The DURATION-NEO-2 randomized clinical study.
Gadde, KM; Hardy, E; Iqbal, N; Öhman, P; Vetter, ML, 2017
)
0.46
" Adverse events and adverse drug reactions were estimated in patients who were treated with exenatide at least once and for whom follow-up for safety has been completed."( Effectiveness and safety of exenatide in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral hypoglycemic agents: an observational study in a real clinical practice.
Cho, JH; Hwang, YC; Jo, E; Kim, A; Lee, BW; Yang, Y, 2017
)
0.46
" In terms of safety profile, exenatide treatment was generally well-tolerated and the incidence of severe adverse event was rare (0."( Effectiveness and safety of exenatide in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral hypoglycemic agents: an observational study in a real clinical practice.
Cho, JH; Hwang, YC; Jo, E; Kim, A; Lee, BW; Yang, Y, 2017
)
0.46
"Lipotoxicity cardiomyopathy is the result of excessive accumulation and oxidation of toxic lipids in the heart."( Glucagon-like peptide-1 ameliorates cardiac lipotoxicity in diabetic cardiomyopathy via the PPARα pathway.
Liu, L; Wang, DW; Wang, K; Wang, P; Wang, W; Wen, Z; Wu, L, 2018
)
0.48
" However, there are key differences within this class of drugs in macrovascular, microvascular, gastrointestinal and injection-site reaction adverse events, and these should be considered when healthcare providers are prescribing therapy."( Safety of Once-weekly Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
Frias, JP, 2018
)
0.48
" Gastrointestinal adverse events (e."( Glycemic Efficacy, Weight Effects, and Safety of Once-Weekly Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists.
Cannon, A; Handelsman, Y; Schneider, D; Shannon, M; Wyne, K, 2018
)
0.48
" Following determination of the significant toxic doses of glucose and fructose, the cells were treated with various doses of exenatide (10-250 nM) in the presence or absence of glucose and fructose."( The investigation of protective effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue exenatide against glucose and fructose-induced neurotoxicity.
Khalilnezhad, A; Taskiran, D, 2019
)
0.51
" Expert opinion: Exenatide QW is an efficacious and safe treatment for T2D."( The efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Brønden, A; Dejgaard, TF; Heimbürger, SM; Johansen, NJ; Knop, FK; Vilsbøll, T, 2019
)
0.51
" There was no serious adverse event related to the study drug."( Efficacy and safety of once-weekly exenatide after switching from twice-daily exenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Imai, T; Inaishi, J; Irie, J; Itoh, H; Kanazawa, Y; Kou, K; Masaoka, T; Meguro, S; Murakami, R; Okubo, Y; Saisho, Y; Sasaki, H; Tokui, M; Tsuchiya, T; Watanabe, Y; Yamauchi, A, 2020
)
0.56
" Except for the 5-µg and 10-µg groups, the safety and tolerability tests showed no adverse reactions in the 2-µg to 50-µg groups."( Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Single Dose Polyethylene Glycolated Exenatide Injection (PB-119) in Healthy Volunteers.
Cui, H; Li, Y; Liu, Y; Lv, Y; Tian, JH; Wei, MJ; Xia, YH; Zhang, P; Zhao, CY; Zhu, Y, 2020
)
0.56
"The administration of polyethylene glycolated exenatide injection at a single dose of 2-200 µg is safe and tolerable for healthy volunteers."( Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Single Dose Polyethylene Glycolated Exenatide Injection (PB-119) in Healthy Volunteers.
Cui, H; Li, Y; Liu, Y; Lv, Y; Tian, JH; Wei, MJ; Xia, YH; Zhang, P; Zhao, CY; Zhu, Y, 2020
)
0.56
" The incidence of adverse events, including the incidence of hypoglycemia (18."( Efficacy and safety of generic exenatide injection in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial.
Gao, Y; Guo, L; Hong, T; Li, Q; Tian, Q; Xiao, W; Yang, J; Zhong, L, 2020
)
0.56
" All long-acting GLP-1RAs have, at minimum, been shown to be safe and not increase cardiovascular (CV) risk and most (liraglutide, semaglutide injectable, dulaglutide, albiglutide) have been shown in CV outcomes trials (CVOTs) to significantly reduce the risk of major cardiac adverse events."( Long-acting GLP-1RAs: An overview of efficacy, safety, and their role in type 2 diabetes management.
Butts, A; Chun, JH, 2020
)
0.56
" Extracted safety data included gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs), hypoglycaemia, injection-site reactions, pancreatitis, neoplasms, gallbladder events, and diabetic retinopathy (DR) and/or its complications (DRCs)."( Safety and tolerability of once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes.
Trujillo, J, 2020
)
0.56
" However, GLP-1RAs treatments had more gastrointestinal adverse events (such as nausea and vomiting) than placebo and Met."( The Antiobesity Effect and Safety of GLP-1 Receptor Agonist in Overweight/Obese Patients Without Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Gong, F; Guo, X; Lyu, X; Pan, H; Wang, L; Xu, H; Yang, H; Zhou, Z; Zhu, H, 2022
)
0.72
" There were no significant differences between treatments in the incidence of adverse events, except that liraglutide+metformin had significant adverse effect such as abdominal pain."( Comparative efficacy and safety of glucose-lowering drugs in children and adolescents with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Feng, Y; Ge, Y; He, Y; Hou, L; Huo, M; Ji, Y; Li, H; Liu, X; Liu, Y; Luo, Q; Qian, F; Wang, J; Wei, Y; Wu, S; Wu, Y; Xue, F; Yu, Y, 2022
)
0.72
" Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing pharmacological interventions in children with obesity are scarce; therefore, we aimed to analyze the relative efficacy and adverse reactions of these drugs and compare the effects of each drug on body mass index (BMI)."( Comparison of weight loss and adverse events of obesity drugs in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liu, H; Wu, F; Xie, Y; Yin, S; Zhang, Q; Zhao, G, 2022
)
0.72
" However, it was most associated with drug withdrawal due to adverse events while topiramate was least."( Comparison of weight loss and adverse events of obesity drugs in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liu, H; Wu, F; Xie, Y; Yin, S; Zhang, Q; Zhao, G, 2022
)
0.72
"The study aimed to determine whether GLP-1RAs are associated with increased detection of pancreatic carcinoma based on the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System and clarify its potential mechanisms through keyword co-occurrence analysis from literature database."( Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and the potential risk of pancreatic carcinoma: a pharmacovigilance study using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and literature visualization analysis.
Cao, M; Pan, C; Tian, Y; Wang, L; Zhao, Z; Zhu, B, 2023
)
0.91

Pharmacokinetics

The pharmacokinetics of polyethylene glycolated exenatide was studied in 36 subjects. It showed slow absorption, a mean peak time of 20-40 h, and a mean elimination half-life of 51-64 h. The aim of the present analysis was to develop a core population pharmacokinetic model.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"The purpose of this study is to ascertain the pharmacodynamic properties of exendin-4, a glucose-dependent insulinotropic agent, from plasma glucose and insulin concentration-time profiles following a 60-min intravenous infusion in healthy and type 2 diabetic subjects."( Exendin-4 pharmacodynamics: insights from the hyperglycemic clamp technique.
Abernethy, DR; Egan, JM; Elahi, D; Mager, DE, 2004
)
0.32
"In both studies, plasma exenatide pharmacokinetic profiles appeared dose proportional."( Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of exenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Baron, AD; Fineman, MS; Kim, DD; Kolterman, OG; Nielsen, LL; Ruggles, JA; Shen, L, 2005
)
0.33
" injection resulted in dose-proportional exenatide pharmacokinetics and antidiabetic pharmacodynamic activity."( Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of exenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Baron, AD; Fineman, MS; Kim, DD; Kolterman, OG; Nielsen, LL; Ruggles, JA; Shen, L, 2005
)
0.33
" Digoxin urinary pharmacokinetic parameters were not altered."( Effect of exenatide on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of digoxin.
Chan, C; Kothare, PA; Lim, M; Linnebjerg, H; Mace, KF; Park, S; Soon, DK; Wise, SD; Yeo, A, 2005
)
0.33
"Despite observed changes in lovastatin bioavailability in the pharmacokinetic drug interaction study, exenatide did not negatively affect long-term lipid profiles or statin dosage in patients with concurrent statin therapy."( Exenatide effects on statin pharmacokinetics and lipid response.
Fineman, M; Han, J; Kothare, PA; Linnebjerg, H; Mace, K; Mitchell, M; Pena, A; Reddy, S; Skrivanek, Z, 2007
)
0.34
"Exenatide, 5 microg and 10 microg, was rapidly absorbed with a median tmax of 1 h after single and multiple doses."( Exenatide pharmacokinetics in healthy Chinese subjects.
Cui, YM; Kothare, P; Linnebjerg, H; Mace, K; Soon, D; Teng, LL; Tham, LS; Yeo, KP; Zhang, HL; Zhao, X; Zhou, Y, 2008
)
0.35
"Exenatide was rapidly absorbed, with similar pharmacokinetic properties following single and multiple doses."( Exenatide pharmacokinetics in healthy Chinese subjects.
Cui, YM; Kothare, P; Linnebjerg, H; Mace, K; Soon, D; Teng, LL; Tham, LS; Yeo, KP; Zhang, HL; Zhao, X; Zhou, Y, 2008
)
0.35
" For the evaluable pharmacokinetic population, geometric mean (90% confidence interval) steady-state plasma concentrations (pg/mL) were 81."( Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of exenatide once weekly in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.
Iwamoto, K; Kothare, PA; Linnebjerg, H; Mace, K; Nasu, R; Wolka, AM; Yamamura, A, 2009
)
0.35
" The primary pharmacodynamic parameters were baseline-adjusted 24-hour mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure."( The effect of exenatide on lisinopril pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics in patients with hypertension.
Kothare, P; Linnebjerg, H; Mace, K; Mitchell, M; Park, S, 2009
)
0.35
" The aim of this work is to estimate the population pharmacokinetics of liraglutide and make a comparison to the pharmacokinetic profile of exenatide."( Population pharmacokinetics of liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analog, in healthy volunteers and subjects with type 2 diabetes, and comparison to twice-daily exenatide.
Ingwersen, SH; Jacobsen, LV; Jonker, DM; Watson, E, 2010
)
0.36
" These molecules, called CovX-Bodies, maintain both the pharmacologic properties of a given peptide and the pharmacokinetic properties of a monoclonal antibody."( Combined use of immunoassay and two-dimensional liquid chromatography mass spectrometry for the detection and identification of metabolites from biotherapeutic pharmacokinetic samples.
Del Rosario, J; Kinhikar, AG; Levin, N; Murphy, RE; Preston, R; Shields, MJ; Ward, GH, 2010
)
0.36
" The pharmacokinetic and safety effects of single-dose subcutaneous administration of exenatide ER (2."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of exenatide extended-release after single and multiple dosing.
Aisporna, M; Cirincione, B; Diamant, M; Fineman, M; Flanagan, S; Kothare, P; Li, WI; MacConell, L; Mace, KF; Shen, LZ; Taylor, K; Walsh, B, 2011
)
0.37
" Pharmacokinetic parameters for exenatide after subcutaneous administration of a single dose of 5-10 μg were as follows: Cmax=77."( Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of a generic formulation of exenatide: a randomized, open-label, single- and multiple-dose study in healthy Chinese volunteers.
Li, Z; Liu, Y; Shi, S; Wu, J; Zeng, F; Zhou, X, 2012
)
0.38
" Single- (Day 8) and multiple-dose (Day 22) pharmacokinetic profiles were assessed for each treatment period."( Effect of exenatide on the pharmacokinetics of a combination oral contraceptive in healthy women: an open-label, randomised, crossover trial.
Kothare, PA; Linnebjerg, H; Mace, K; Mitchell, MI; Northrup, J; Seger, ME, 2012
)
0.38
" Single-dose oral contraceptive administration 30 minutes after exenatide resulted in mean (90% CI) Cmax reductions of 46% (42-51%) and 41% (35-47%) for EE and LV, respectively."( Effect of exenatide on the pharmacokinetics of a combination oral contraceptive in healthy women: an open-label, randomised, crossover trial.
Kothare, PA; Linnebjerg, H; Mace, K; Mitchell, MI; Northrup, J; Seger, ME, 2012
)
0.38
"The observed reduction in Cmax is likely of limited importance given the unaltered oral contraceptive bioavailability and trough concentrations; however, for oral medications that are dependent on threshold concentrations for efficacy, such as contraceptives and antibiotics, patients should be advised to take those drugs at least 1 hour before exenatide injection."( Effect of exenatide on the pharmacokinetics of a combination oral contraceptive in healthy women: an open-label, randomised, crossover trial.
Kothare, PA; Linnebjerg, H; Mace, K; Mitchell, MI; Northrup, J; Seger, ME, 2012
)
0.38
"45 h(-1), and the two-compartment model well described its pharmacokinetic profile."( Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies on exenatide in diabetic rats.
Chen, Y; Li, L; Li, XG; Lu, W; Ren, YP; Zhou, TY; Zhou, X, 2012
)
0.38
" After obtained the conjugate we confirmed its glucose-lowering activity in normal mice and determined its half-life in SD rats."( A site-specific PEGylated analog of exendin-4 with improved pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in vivo.
Gao, M; Gao, X; Jin, Y; Tian, H; Tong, Y; Yao, W, 2012
)
0.38
" In SD rats its half-life was prolonged to 27."( A site-specific PEGylated analog of exendin-4 with improved pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in vivo.
Gao, M; Gao, X; Jin, Y; Tian, H; Tong, Y; Yao, W, 2012
)
0.38
" The GLP-1-RA are administered subcutaneously and differ substantially in pharmacokinetic profiles."( GLP-1 agonists for type 2 diabetes: pharmacokinetic and toxicological considerations.
Christensen, M; Jespersen, MJ; Knop, FK, 2013
)
0.39
" The difference in chemical structure have strong implications for key pharmacokinetic parameters such as absorption and clearance, and eventually the safety and efficacy of the individual GLP-1-RA."( GLP-1 agonists for type 2 diabetes: pharmacokinetic and toxicological considerations.
Christensen, M; Jespersen, MJ; Knop, FK, 2013
)
0.39
" Human pharmacokinetic profiles following IV and SC administration were simulated using the final model structure and parameter estimates and compared to clinical data."( Interspecies modeling and prediction of human exenatide pharmacokinetics.
Chen, T; Kagan, L; Mager, DE, 2013
)
0.39
" Pharmacokinetic parameters of exenatide, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), HbA1c, and body weight were summarized using descriptive statistics."( Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of single- and multiple-dose exenatide once weekly in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Cui, YM; Guo, XH; Linnebjerg, H; Mace, K; Tang, CC; Tham, LS; Zhang, DM, 2013
)
0.39
" has a pharmacokinetic profile in this patient population similar to that observed in other ethnic and racial populations, and appears to be safe and generally well tolerated, with the potential to improve glycemic control and decrease body weight without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia."( Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of single- and multiple-dose exenatide once weekly in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Cui, YM; Guo, XH; Linnebjerg, H; Mace, K; Tang, CC; Tham, LS; Zhang, DM, 2013
)
0.39
"The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of exenatide on glycemic control following two administration routes in a streptozotocin/nicotinamide (STZ/NA)-induced diabetic rat model, and to develop a pharmacodynamic model to better understand the disease progression and the action of exenatide in this experimental system."( Population pharmacodynamic modeling of exenatide after 2-week treatment in STZ/NA diabetic rats.
Chen, T; Kagan, L; Mager, DE, 2013
)
0.39
"The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic properties, pharmacodynamic properties, and tolerability of PT302 after a single subcutaneous injection in healthy individuals."( Pharmacokinetic properties and effects of PT302 after repeated oral glucose loading tests in a dose-escalating study.
Cho, SH; Gu, N; Jang, IJ; Kim, J; Lee, H; Lim, KS; Seol, E; Shin, D; Shin, SG; Yu, KS, 2014
)
0.4
" Noncompartmental analysis was performed to assess the pharmacokinetic characteristics of PT302."( Pharmacokinetic properties and effects of PT302 after repeated oral glucose loading tests in a dose-escalating study.
Cho, SH; Gu, N; Jang, IJ; Kim, J; Lee, H; Lim, KS; Seol, E; Shin, D; Shin, SG; Yu, KS, 2014
)
0.4
"PT302 exhibits a biphasic pharmacokinetic profile, with the initial peak occurring 2 hours after administration."( Pharmacokinetic properties and effects of PT302 after repeated oral glucose loading tests in a dose-escalating study.
Cho, SH; Gu, N; Jang, IJ; Kim, J; Lee, H; Lim, KS; Seol, E; Shin, D; Shin, SG; Yu, KS, 2014
)
0.4
"The pharmacokinetic characteristics of PT302 were biphasic and dose proportional."( Pharmacokinetic properties and effects of PT302 after repeated oral glucose loading tests in a dose-escalating study.
Cho, SH; Gu, N; Jang, IJ; Kim, J; Lee, H; Lim, KS; Seol, E; Shin, D; Shin, SG; Yu, KS, 2014
)
0.4
" Using hybrid PK/PD model, simulations were done to explore the potential dosing regimens which could achieve likelihood of more pharmacodynamic exposure with respect to FPG and HbA1c over a much shorter period compared with the currently used treatment protocol."( Target-mediated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model based meta-analysis and dosing regimen optimization of a long-acting release formulation of exenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Fan, X; Li, H; Xu, J, 2015
)
0.42
"Our work identifies sources of potential pharmacokinetic variability relating to the method of delivery and the drug's formulation that will be valuable to investigators contemplating the delivery of peptides via insulin infusion pumps."( Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Exenatide Delivered by 7-Day Continuous Subcutaneous Infusion in Healthy Volunteers.
Chism, JP; Gruenloh, CJ; Johnson, SL; Lin, J; Nunez, DJ; Vlasakakis, G; Yao, X, 2015
)
0.42
" The purpose of this study was to examine pharmacodynamic outcomes with exenatide once weekly and to determine whether changes are secondary to weight loss and thus delayed by the sequential nature of responses."( Early Pharmacodynamic Effects of Exenatide Once Weekly in Type 2 Diabetes Are Independent of Weight Loss: A Pooled Analysis of Patient-level Data.
Han, J; Ruggles, J; Trautmann, ME, 2016
)
0.43
" There were no clinically meaningful correlations between weight loss and improvements in pharmacodynamic outcomes at weeks 2, 4, or 24."( Early Pharmacodynamic Effects of Exenatide Once Weekly in Type 2 Diabetes Are Independent of Weight Loss: A Pooled Analysis of Patient-level Data.
Han, J; Ruggles, J; Trautmann, ME, 2016
)
0.43
"Improvements in pharmacodynamic end points occurred early in treatment with exenatide once weekly, before steady-state plasma concentrations."( Early Pharmacodynamic Effects of Exenatide Once Weekly in Type 2 Diabetes Are Independent of Weight Loss: A Pooled Analysis of Patient-level Data.
Han, J; Ruggles, J; Trautmann, ME, 2016
)
0.43
"The aim of the present analysis was to develop a core population pharmacokinetic model for the pharmacokinetic properties of immediate-release (IR) exenatide, which can be used in subsequent analyses of novel sustained-release formulations."( Population pharmacokinetics of exenatide.
Cirincione, B; Mager, DE, 2017
)
0.46
"The present analysis provides a comprehensive population pharmacokinetic model for exenatide, expanding the elimination process to include both linear and nonlinear components, providing a suitable platform for a broad range of concentrations and patient conditions that can be leveraged in future modelling efforts of sustained-release exenatide formulations."( Population pharmacokinetics of exenatide.
Cirincione, B; Mager, DE, 2017
)
0.46
" The goal of this analysis was to develop a pharmacokinetic model for the ER formulation following single and once-weekly multiple-dose administration."( Population Pharmacokinetics of an Extended-Release Formulation of Exenatide Following Single- and Multiple-Dose Administration.
Cirincione, B; Edwards, J; Mager, DE, 2017
)
0.46
" We evaluated pharmacokinetic parameters of rE-4 and exenatide, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-h postprandial blood glucose (PG2 h), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight at designated time points."( Pharmacokinetics and Preliminary Pharmacodynamics of Single- and Multiple-dose Lyophilized Recombinant Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist (rE-4) in Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Chen, Y; Cui, Y; Fang, Y; Guo, X; Ji, L; Lou, K; Wang, Q; Wang, Y; Xu, B; Xu, L; Zhao, X; Zhu, L, 2017
)
0.46
"rE-4 twice a day has a pharmacokinetic profile similar to exenatide and rE-4 with metformin after single and multiple doses in Chinese patients with T2DM."( Pharmacokinetics and Preliminary Pharmacodynamics of Single- and Multiple-dose Lyophilized Recombinant Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist (rE-4) in Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Chen, Y; Cui, Y; Fang, Y; Guo, X; Ji, L; Lou, K; Wang, Q; Wang, Y; Xu, B; Xu, L; Zhao, X; Zhu, L, 2017
)
0.46
" Exenatide release from PT320 exhibited a triphasic pharmacokinetic profile."( Pharmacokinetics of Exenatide in nonhuman primates following its administration in the form of sustained-release PT320 and Bydureon.
Choi, HI; Greig, NH; Jung, J; Kim, DS; Kim, HK; Li, Y; Mattison, JA; Tweedie, D; Vaughan, KL, 2019
)
0.51
" Our study aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic characteristics of polyethylene glycolated exenatide as a single subcutaneous injection in healthy volunteers."( Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Single Dose Polyethylene Glycolated Exenatide Injection (PB-119) in Healthy Volunteers.
Cui, H; Li, Y; Liu, Y; Lv, Y; Tian, JH; Wei, MJ; Xia, YH; Zhang, P; Zhao, CY; Zhu, Y, 2020
)
0.56
" The pharmacokinetic test was carried out in the 25- to 400-µg groups, and plasma samples were collected to determine the pharmacokinetics of polyethylene glycolated exenatide."( Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Single Dose Polyethylene Glycolated Exenatide Injection (PB-119) in Healthy Volunteers.
Cui, H; Li, Y; Liu, Y; Lv, Y; Tian, JH; Wei, MJ; Xia, YH; Zhang, P; Zhao, CY; Zhu, Y, 2020
)
0.56
" The pharmacokinetics of polyethylene glycolated exenatide was studied in 36 subjects, which showed slow absorption, a mean peak time of 20-40 h, and a mean elimination half-life of 51-64 h."( Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Single Dose Polyethylene Glycolated Exenatide Injection (PB-119) in Healthy Volunteers.
Cui, H; Li, Y; Liu, Y; Lv, Y; Tian, JH; Wei, MJ; Xia, YH; Zhang, P; Zhao, CY; Zhu, Y, 2020
)
0.56
"This pilot study provides validation for the value of a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (including minimal model analysis) to provide primary data for our ongoing pharmacogenomic study of pharmacodynamic effects of semaglutide (NCT05071898)."( Acute pharmacodynamic responses to exenatide: Drug-induced increases in insulin secretion and glucose effectiveness.
Beitelshees, AL; Fan, H; Mitchell, BD; Montasser, ME; Muniyappa, R; Shuldiner, AR; Streeten, EA; Taylor, SI; Whitlatch, HB; Yazdi, ZS; Yuen, AH, 2023
)
0.91

Compound-Compound Interactions

Exenatide can improve metabolic and endocrine markers, and the diversity and abundance of gut microbiota in patients with obesity with PCOS. The adverse event (AE) profile and effects on glycemic control have not been assessed for the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"This 16-week study explored the safety of substituting exenatide for insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes using insulin in combination with oral antidiabetes agents."( Exploring the substitution of exenatide for insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin in combination with oral antidiabetes agents.
Brodows, RG; Davis, SN; Johns, D; Maggs, D; Northrup, JH; Xu, H, 2007
)
0.34
"To evaluate the 1-year efficacy and safety of treatment with exenatide in combination with insulin (a use not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration)."( Safety and efficacy of exenatide in combination with insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Abelseth, JM; Bakst, G; Busch, RS; Hamilton, RA; Kane, MP; Sheffield, CA, 2008
)
0.35
"We identified 134 patients with T2DM initiating exenatide therapy in combination with insulin between April 2005 and April 2006."( Safety and efficacy of exenatide in combination with insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Abelseth, JM; Bakst, G; Busch, RS; Hamilton, RA; Kane, MP; Sheffield, CA, 2008
)
0.35
"Exenatide in combination with insulin in patients with T2DM was associated with significant reductions in A1C and weight after 1 year of therapy."( Safety and efficacy of exenatide in combination with insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Abelseth, JM; Bakst, G; Busch, RS; Hamilton, RA; Kane, MP; Sheffield, CA, 2008
)
0.35
" Under these circumstances sub-chronic administration of exendin-4 alone or particularly when combined with N-AcGIP significantly (P<0."( Antidiabetic effects of sub-chronic activation of the GIP receptor alone and in combination with background exendin-4 therapy in high fat fed mice.
Flatt, PR; Frizzell, N; Hunter, K; Irwin, N, 2009
)
0.35
"When combined with lifestyle modification, exenatide treatment led to significant weight loss, improved glycemic control, and decreased blood pressure compared with lifestyle modification alone in overweight or obese participants with type 2 diabetes on metformin and/or sulfonylurea treatment."( Effects of exenatide combined with lifestyle modification in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Apovian, CM; Bergenstal, RM; Cuddihy, RM; Glass, LC; Lenox, S; Lewis, MS; Qu, Y, 2010
)
0.36
"Exenatide added to TZDs alone or in combination with metformin significantly improved glycaemic control as determined by significant improvement in HbA(1c) without associated hypoglycaemia."( A placebo-controlled trial of exenatide twice-daily added to thiazolidinediones alone or in combination with metformin.
Cao, D; Liutkus, J; Northrup, J; Norwood, P; Pop, L; Rosas Guzman, J; Trautmann, M, 2010
)
0.36
" Herein, the results of clinical trials assessing the efficacy, safety and tolerability of liraglutide when used in combination with either one or two oral antidiabetic therapies are summarised, then contrasted with the effects of exenatide and dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP-4) inhibitors."( Liraglutide in oral antidiabetic drug combination therapy.
Garber, AJ, 2012
)
0.38
" Recent findings suggest that amylin is able to restore leptin sensitivity and when used in combination with leptin enhances body weight loss in obese rodents and humans."( Restoration of leptin responsiveness in diet-induced obese mice using an optimized leptin analog in combination with exendin-4 or FGF21.
Axelrod, DW; DeGuzman, MJ; DiMarchi, R; Grant, E; Habegger, K; Hembree, J; Holland, J; Kabra, D; Kraynov, VS; Krishna, R; Müller, TD; Ottaway, N; Perez-Tilve, D; Pfluger, PT; Pinkstaff, JK; Siladi, ME; Sullivan, LM; Tschöp, MH; Yi, CX, 2012
)
0.38
" The adverse event (AE) profile and effects on glycemic control have not been assessed for the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exenatide once weekly in combination with a thiazolidinedione (TZD) with or without metformin."( Safety of exenatide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with a thiazolidinedione alone or in combination with metformin for 2 years.
Boardman, MK; Haber, H; Liutkus, JF; Norwood, P; Pintilei, E; Trautmann, ME, 2012
)
0.38
" In FAERS, rosiglitazone usage is associated with increased occurrence of MI, but its combination with exenatide significantly reduces rosiglitazone-associated MI."( Systems pharmacology of adverse event mitigation by drug combinations.
Azeloglu, EU; Badimon, JJ; Benard, L; Chen, Y; Giannarelli, C; Goldfarb, J; Gottesman, O; Hajjar, RJ; Iyengar, R; Nishimura, T; Zafar, MU; Zhao, S, 2013
)
0.39
"The effects of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, linagliptin, alone and in combination with voglibose or exendin-4, on glycaemic control and body weight were assessed in an animal model of type 2 diabetes."( Effect of linagliptin, alone and in combination with voglibose or exendin-4, on glucose control in male ZDF rats.
Cheetham, SC; Headland, KR; Jones, RB; Klein, T; Mark, M; Vickers, SP, 2014
)
0.4
"To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of metformin combined with liraglutide or exenatide in Chinese patient with T2DM."( Long-Term Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Metformin Combined with Liraglutide or Exenatide for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Based on the CORE Diabetes Model Study.
Li, Y; Liu, G; Liu, S; Tian, M; Wang, Y; Zhang, X, 2016
)
0.43
"Patients with T2DM from the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University were treated with oral metformin combined with liraglutide (0."( Long-Term Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Metformin Combined with Liraglutide or Exenatide for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Based on the CORE Diabetes Model Study.
Li, Y; Liu, G; Liu, S; Tian, M; Wang, Y; Zhang, X, 2016
)
0.43
" We investigated the effects of Ex-4 in combination with human adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ADSCs) on diabetic wound healing in a diabetic animal model."( Exendin-4 in combination with adipose-derived stem cells promotes angiogenesis and improves diabetic wound healing.
Choi, W; Hong, IS; Jun, HS; Jun, JB; Lim, JS; Seo, E, 2017
)
0.46
" In this study, we evaluated metabolic properties of oral nutritional supplement epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) in combination with GLP-1 agonist exendin-4 in a mouse model of dietary-induced diabetes and obesity."( Beneficial metabolic effects of dietary epigallocatechin gallate alone and in combination with exendin-4 in high fat diabetic mice.
Flatt, PR; Gault, VA; Millar, PJB; Pathak, NM; Pathak, V, 2018
)
0.48
"EGCG alone and particularly in combination with exendin-4 exerts positive metabolic properties in HF mice."( Beneficial metabolic effects of dietary epigallocatechin gallate alone and in combination with exendin-4 in high fat diabetic mice.
Flatt, PR; Gault, VA; Millar, PJB; Pathak, NM; Pathak, V, 2018
)
0.48
"Both exenatide combined with metformin and metformin monotherapy can improve metabolic and endocrine markers, and the diversity and abundance of gut microbiota in patients with obesity with PCOS."( Metagenomics study on taxonomic and functional change of gut microbiota in patients with obesity with PCOS treated with exenatide combination with metformin or metformin alone.
Chen, J; Deng, Y; Ding, XS; Gan, J; Ma, RL; Sun, AJ; Zhu, SY, 2023
)
0.91
" In this meta-analysis, we aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of exenatide alone or in combination with metformin versus metformin in patients suffering from PCOS."( Comparison of exenatide alone or combined with metformin versus metformin in the treatment of polycystic ovaries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Guo, Y; Hamiti, S; Hu, Y; Ma, Y; Song, X; Wang, X; Yusufu, M; Zhang, K, 2023
)
0.91
" Exenatide combined with metformin was more effective in improving SHBG (MD 10."( Comparison of exenatide alone or combined with metformin versus metformin in the treatment of polycystic ovaries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Guo, Y; Hamiti, S; Hu, Y; Ma, Y; Song, X; Wang, X; Yusufu, M; Zhang, K, 2023
)
0.91
"Exenatide alone or in combination with metformin is more effective than metformin for women with PCOS."( Comparison of exenatide alone or combined with metformin versus metformin in the treatment of polycystic ovaries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Guo, Y; Hamiti, S; Hu, Y; Ma, Y; Song, X; Wang, X; Yusufu, M; Zhang, K, 2023
)
0.91

Bioavailability

Exenatide was well absorbed with a median t(max) of 1. It did not negatively affect long-term lipid profiles or statin dosage in patients with concurrent statin therapy.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"The goal of this study was to determine the relative bioavailability of exenatide injected subcutaneously into the abdomen, arm, or thigh."( A randomized, open-label, crossover study examining the effect of injection site on bioavailability of exenatide (synthetic exendin-4).
Calara, F; Carr, EM; Fineman, M; Han, J; Taylor, K; Wintle, M; Zabala, E, 2005
)
0.33
"Patients with type 2 DM were randomized in an open-label, crossover study to assess relative bioavailability of exenatide (10 microg) injected into the arm and thigh versus injection into the abdomen."( A randomized, open-label, crossover study examining the effect of injection site on bioavailability of exenatide (synthetic exendin-4).
Calara, F; Carr, EM; Fineman, M; Han, J; Taylor, K; Wintle, M; Zabala, E, 2005
)
0.33
" Based on animal studies, the bioavailability of exenatide after subcutaneous injection has been estimated to be between 65% and 75%."( Exenatide.
Bray, GM, 2006
)
0.33
" Exenatide slows gastric emptying, which may alter the absorption rate of co-administered oral medications."( Exenatide effects on statin pharmacokinetics and lipid response.
Fineman, M; Han, J; Kothare, PA; Linnebjerg, H; Mace, K; Mitchell, M; Pena, A; Reddy, S; Skrivanek, Z, 2007
)
0.34
"Despite observed changes in lovastatin bioavailability in the pharmacokinetic drug interaction study, exenatide did not negatively affect long-term lipid profiles or statin dosage in patients with concurrent statin therapy."( Exenatide effects on statin pharmacokinetics and lipid response.
Fineman, M; Han, J; Kothare, PA; Linnebjerg, H; Mace, K; Mitchell, M; Pena, A; Reddy, S; Skrivanek, Z, 2007
)
0.34
" Bioavailability (versus intravenous administration) and C(max) per unit dose differed markedly."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of exenatide following alternate routes of administration.
Bhavsar, S; Chen, K; Gedulin, BR; Jodka, CM; Nielsen, LL; Parkes, DG; Smith, PA; Young, AA, 2008
)
0.35
" The absolute bioavailability (BA (%)) values depend on the physichochemical characters of drugs, stereoisomer character of penetratin, and site of administration."( Efficiency of cell-penetrating peptides on the nasal and intestinal absorption of therapeutic peptides and proteins.
Eda, Y; Ikeno, Y; Kamei, N; Khafagy, el-S; Morishita, M; Takayama, K, 2009
)
0.35
" This dose showed systemic bioavailability (0."( 3-Iodothyronamine: a modulator of the hypothalamus-pancreas-thyroid axes in mice.
Bigagli, E; Chiellini, G; Cinci, L; De Siena, G; Dicembrini, I; Lodovici, M; Manni, ME; Marchini, M; Raimondi, L; Saba, A; Zucchi, R, 2012
)
0.38
" The absorption rate constant (k(a)) decreased with increasing doses in all three species."( Target-mediated pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model of exendin-4 in rats, monkeys, and humans.
Gao, W; Jusko, WJ, 2012
)
0.38
"Consistent with its effect on gastric emptying, exenatide, an injectable treatment for type 2 diabetes, may slow the absorption rate of concomitantly administered oral drugs resulting in a decrease in maximum concentration (Cmax)."( Effect of exenatide on the pharmacokinetics of a combination oral contraceptive in healthy women: an open-label, randomised, crossover trial.
Kothare, PA; Linnebjerg, H; Mace, K; Mitchell, MI; Northrup, J; Seger, ME, 2012
)
0.38
"Exenatide did not alter the bioavailability nor decrease daily trough concentrations for either oral contraceptive component."( Effect of exenatide on the pharmacokinetics of a combination oral contraceptive in healthy women: an open-label, randomised, crossover trial.
Kothare, PA; Linnebjerg, H; Mace, K; Mitchell, MI; Northrup, J; Seger, ME, 2012
)
0.38
"The observed reduction in Cmax is likely of limited importance given the unaltered oral contraceptive bioavailability and trough concentrations; however, for oral medications that are dependent on threshold concentrations for efficacy, such as contraceptives and antibiotics, patients should be advised to take those drugs at least 1 hour before exenatide injection."( Effect of exenatide on the pharmacokinetics of a combination oral contraceptive in healthy women: an open-label, randomised, crossover trial.
Kothare, PA; Linnebjerg, H; Mace, K; Mitchell, MI; Northrup, J; Seger, ME, 2012
)
0.38
" The bioavailability of the exenatide-loaded microspheres, relative to subcutaneous injection of exenatide, reached 10."( Oral delivery of exenatide via microspheres prepared by cross-linking of alginate and hyaluronate.
Chen, Y; Fan, Y; He, D; Liu, N; Zhang, B, 2014
)
0.4
" Orally bioavailable orthosteric small-molecule agonists are unlikely to be developed, whereas positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) may offer an improved therapeutic profile."( A Duplexed High-Throughput Screen to Identify Allosteric Modulators of the Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 and Glucagon Receptors.
Days, EL; Lindsley, CW; Mi, D; Morris, LC; Niswender, KD; Turney, M; Weaver, CD, 2014
)
0.4
" Although several limited studies demonstrated non-invasive means of protein delivery, major hurdles for commercial success such as short half-life, enzymatic degradation and low bioavailability still remain to overcome."( Thermo-reversible injectable gel based on enzymatically-chopped low molecular weight methylcellulose for exenatide and FGF 21 delivery to treat types 1 and 2 diabetes.
Cha, YH; Kim, JK; Kim, YH; Yoo, C, 2014
)
0.4
" Our results demonstrate that such a system indeed improves the relative oral bioavailability of exenatide to a level of about 77% compared to subcutaneous injection due to the presence of dextran in the coating wall of the NPs which apparently promotes the lymphatic uptake in the enterocytes."( Improved oral absorption of exenatide using an original nanoencapsulation and microencapsulation approach.
Benita, S; Naraykin, N; Nassar, T; Soudry-Kochavi, L, 2015
)
0.42
" In-vivo administration of the devices provided significant enhancement of drug absorption with 13- and 80-fold enhancement of relative bioavailability for insulin and exenatide compared to intestinal injections with significant increase in half-lives, thus resulting in prolonged blood glucose reduction."( Delivery of Exenatide and Insulin Using Mucoadhesive Intestinal Devices.
Anselmo, AC; Banerjee, A; Doshi, N; Gupta, V; Hwang, BH; Mitragotri, S, 2016
)
0.43
" Cocaine acts by altering DA bioavailability by targeting the DAT."( Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor activation regulates cocaine actions and dopamine homeostasis in the lateral septum by decreasing arachidonic acid levels.
Bering, T; Bluett, RJ; Erreger, K; Fink-Jensen, A; Galli, A; Graham, D; Hackett, TA; Osses, N; Patel, S; Pino, JA; Reddy, IA; Reyes, JG; Stanwood, GD; Sørensen, G; Torres, GE; Valle, C; Weikop, P; Wortwein, G, 2016
)
0.43
" The mean bioavailability was 20% relative to subcutaneous administration, even though it fell short of 1% when exendin-4 alone was administered nasally."( Biocompatible Polymers Modified with d-Octaarginine as an Absorption Enhancer for Nasal Peptide Delivery.
Fujii, K; Higashitarumi, S; Hiwatari, KI; Ishizaki, S; Kobayashi, H; Kumagai, H; Miyata, K; Mohri, K; Ochiai, K; Sakuma, S; Shigeno, K; Tanishita, S; Tobita, E; Tsubaki, K; Ukawa, M; Yamada, M, 2018
)
0.48
" While MCTs are edible oils present in many foods, including foodstuffs containing coconut and palm kernel oils, limited information is available regarding the oral and subcutaneous bioavailability of MCTs as well as safety following subcutaneous injection."( Nonclinical safety and pharmacokinetics of Miglyol 812: A medium chain triglyceride in exenatide once weekly suspension.
Baughman, T; Buss, N; Dixit, R; Gordon, C; Patterson, C; Roy, D; Ryan, P, 2018
)
0.48
"Exenatide preconditioning attenuated the oxidative stress injury and promoted the myocardial function in I/R-induced myocardial injury, while the application of block copolymer PLL-PEG-PLL as a potential exenatide nanocarrier with sustained release significantly enhanced the bioavailability of exenatide."( Pharmacological Signatures of the Exenatide Nanoparticles Complex Against Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion Injury.
Hu, B; Jin, L; Qian, P; Shen, R; Shen, X; Shen, Y; Xu, G; Zhang, X; Zhang, Y; Zhou, H, 2018
)
0.48
" In rat models, a single oral dose (200 μg/kg) of EL-CSG showed a relative oral bioavailability of 19."( Long-term oral administration of Exendin-4 to control type 2 diabetes in a rat model.
Bae, YH; Kim, KS; Suzuki, K, 2019
)
0.51
" This strategy increases the endogenous secretion of GLP-1 and the oral bioavailability of the GLP-1 analogue exenatide (4% bioavailability with our nanosystem)."( Novel strategy for oral peptide delivery in incretin-based diabetes treatment.
Beloqui, A; Cani, PD; Préat, V; Suriano, F; Van Hul, M; Xu, Y, 2020
)
0.56
"We developed a novel nanosystem compatible with human use that synergizes its own biological effect with the effects of increasing the bioavailability of a GLP-1 analogue."( Novel strategy for oral peptide delivery in incretin-based diabetes treatment.
Beloqui, A; Cani, PD; Préat, V; Suriano, F; Van Hul, M; Xu, Y, 2020
)
0.56
"Our previous mouse studies demonstrated that mean bioavailability of exendin-4, which is an injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue whose molecular weight (Mw) and isoelectric point (pI) are ca."( Nasal absorption enhancement of protein drugs independent to their chemical properties in the presence of hyaluronic acid modified with tetraglycine-L-octaarginine.
Igi, R; Ishizaki, S; Kobayashi, H; Kumagai, H; Miwa, T; Miyata, K; Nonomura, M; Sakuma, S; Tobita, E; Tomono, T; Ukawa, M; Yagi, H, 2020
)
0.56
" When this product was administered subcutaneously to rats, it produced a comparatively constant plasma exenatide concentration that lasted for 24 days and superior bioavailability than the exenatide microspheres (EXT-MS)."( The Modified Exenatide Microspheres: PLGA-PEG-PLGA Gel and Zinc-Exenatide Complex Synergistically Reduce Burst Release and Shorten Platform Stage.
Chen, Y; Gao, X; Jiang, W; Li, D; Wang, Q; Yang, X; Zhang, X, 2023
)
0.91

Dosage Studied

differences may be due to dosing device differences for exenatide QW and liraglutide, which allows the opportunity for daily self-titration dosing. It is an attractive option because it is dosed once-weekly, provides A1C lowering similar to liragsutide.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" Exenatide administration does not cause any changes in digoxin steady-state pharmacokinetics that would be expected to have clinical sequelae; thus, dosage adjustment does not appear warranted, based on pharmacokinetic considerations."( Effect of exenatide on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of digoxin.
Chan, C; Kothare, PA; Lim, M; Linnebjerg, H; Mace, KF; Park, S; Soon, DK; Wise, SD; Yeo, A, 2005
)
0.33
"The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, adverse effects, drug interactions, and dosage and administration of exenatide are discussed."( Exenatide.
Bray, GM, 2006
)
0.33
" The recommended starting dosage is 5 microg subcutaneously twice daily within one hour before the morning and evening meals."( Exenatide.
Bray, GM, 2006
)
0.33
"05 for all treatments), while post-meal dosing groups exhibited a trend towards higher insulin peaks compared with placebo."( Exenatide: effect of injection time on postprandial glucose in patients with Type 2 diabetes.
Atkins, M; de la Peña, A; Ernest, CS; Kothare, PA; Linnebjerg, H; Skrivanek, Z; Trautmann, ME, 2006
)
0.33
" These data support flexible dosing of exenatide at any time within 60 min before a meal."( Exenatide: effect of injection time on postprandial glucose in patients with Type 2 diabetes.
Atkins, M; de la Peña, A; Ernest, CS; Kothare, PA; Linnebjerg, H; Skrivanek, Z; Trautmann, ME, 2006
)
0.33
" The recommended dosage is 5 mug to 10 mug twice daily subcutaneously before breakfast and dinner."( Exenatide: a novel incretin mimetic agent for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Lam, S; See, S,
)
0.13
"This article reviews available information on the clinical pharmacology, comparative efficacy, tolerability, drug interactions, contraindications and precautions, dosage and administration, availability and storage, and cost of exenatide."( Exenatide: an incretin mimetic for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Baker, DE; Iltz, JL; Keith Campbell, R; Setter, SM, 2006
)
0.33
" Outcome measures were the model-based beta-cell function parameters dose-response relating insulin secretion to glucose concentration, rate sensitivity, and potentiation."( Mathematical modeling shows exenatide improved beta-cell function in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin or metformin and a sulfonylurea.
DeFronzo, RA; Ferrannini, E; Halseth, A; Mari, A; Nanayakkara, N; Nielsen, LL, 2006
)
0.33
" In a second clinical setting, changes in lipid profiles and statin dosage over 30 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes were retrospectively compared (n = 180 exenatide 10 microg twice daily (BID), n = 168 placebo BID) in a combined analysis of three placebo-controlled, randomized exenatide Phase 3 trials."( Exenatide effects on statin pharmacokinetics and lipid response.
Fineman, M; Han, J; Kothare, PA; Linnebjerg, H; Mace, K; Mitchell, M; Pena, A; Reddy, S; Skrivanek, Z, 2007
)
0.34
" In the exenatide Phase 3 trials, 30-week changes from baseline for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol, triglycerides and statin dosage were not significantly different between the exenatide and placebo groups treated with statins."( Exenatide effects on statin pharmacokinetics and lipid response.
Fineman, M; Han, J; Kothare, PA; Linnebjerg, H; Mace, K; Mitchell, M; Pena, A; Reddy, S; Skrivanek, Z, 2007
)
0.34
"Despite observed changes in lovastatin bioavailability in the pharmacokinetic drug interaction study, exenatide did not negatively affect long-term lipid profiles or statin dosage in patients with concurrent statin therapy."( Exenatide effects on statin pharmacokinetics and lipid response.
Fineman, M; Han, J; Kothare, PA; Linnebjerg, H; Mace, K; Mitchell, M; Pena, A; Reddy, S; Skrivanek, Z, 2007
)
0.34
"Since tolerability and PK changes were considered clinically acceptable in patients with mild to moderate RI, it would be appropriate to administer exenatide to these patients without dosage adjustment."( Effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of exenatide.
Kothare, PA; Linnebjerg, H; Lins, R; Mace, K; Mitchell, M; Park, S; Reddy, S, 2007
)
0.34
" Insulin dosage requirements were assessed."( Exenatide therapy in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with insulin.
Al-Atrash, F; Bhatia, R; Chaudhuri, A; Dandona, P; Mohanty, P; Viswanathan, P, 2007
)
0.34
"007), and the insulin dosage requirement decreased for rapid-acting and mixed insulins (P<."( Exenatide therapy in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with insulin.
Al-Atrash, F; Bhatia, R; Chaudhuri, A; Dandona, P; Mohanty, P; Viswanathan, P, 2007
)
0.34
" Additionally, these treatment modalities are often limited by inconvenient dosage regimens and safety and tolerability issues, the latter including hypoglycemia, bodyweight gain, edema, and gastrointestinal intolerance."( Long-acting GLP-1 analogs for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Knop, FK; Vilsbøll, T, 2008
)
0.35
" Exenatide Cmax and AUCtau,ss were (geometric mean (90% CI)) 145 (119 - 176) pg/ml and 370 (297 - 460) pg x h/ml, respectively, after multiple dosing with 5 microg."( Exenatide pharmacokinetics in healthy Chinese subjects.
Cui, YM; Kothare, P; Linnebjerg, H; Mace, K; Soon, D; Teng, LL; Tham, LS; Yeo, KP; Zhang, HL; Zhao, X; Zhou, Y, 2008
)
0.35
" The current formulation of exenatide requires twice-daily dosing (exenatide BID), and an extended-release formulation of exenatide is now in development for use as a once-weekly injection (exenatide QW)."( Exenatide once weekly for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.
Kendall, DM; Malone, J; Taylor, K; Trautmann, M; Wilhelm, K, 2009
)
0.35
"To develop an improved sustained-release (SR) formulation of exenatide (a therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus) in a biweekly dosage form with therapeutic efficacy comparable to that achieved with twice-daily injections of the drug."( Pharmacokinetics and efficacy of a biweekly dosage formulation of exenatide in Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF) rats.
Hwang, S; Kang, SH; Kim, TH; Kim, YJ; Kwak, HH; Lee, GI; Shim, CK; Shim, WS; Son, MK; Yoon, ZH; Youn, HJ, 2009
)
0.35
"DA-3091 has the potential to be used safely and efficaciously in a biweekly dosing regimen."( Pharmacokinetics and efficacy of a biweekly dosage formulation of exenatide in Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF) rats.
Hwang, S; Kang, SH; Kim, TH; Kim, YJ; Kwak, HH; Lee, GI; Shim, CK; Shim, WS; Son, MK; Yoon, ZH; Youn, HJ, 2009
)
0.35
" Advances in GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy include development of agents with longer durations of activity allowing for more convenient dosing of therapies for patients with type 2 diabetes, which should lead to better patient compliance, adherence, and overall clinical outcomes."( Beyond glycemic control: treating the entire type 2 diabetes disorder.
Brunton, S, 2009
)
0.35
" Exenatide delayed the time to attain maximum lisinopril concentration (tmax,ss) by 2 hours but did not significantly alter maximum lisinopril concentration (Cmax,ss) or area under the concentration-time profile (AUCtau,ss) over the 24-hour steady-state dosing interval."( The effect of exenatide on lisinopril pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics in patients with hypertension.
Kothare, P; Linnebjerg, H; Mace, K; Mitchell, M; Park, S, 2009
)
0.35
" It was concluded that pharmacokinetic profiles estimated by modeling showed that liraglutide has pharmacokinetic properties consistent with once-daily dosing in humans and provides better pharmacokinetic coverage in comparison with twice-daily exenatide."( Population pharmacokinetics of liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analog, in healthy volunteers and subjects with type 2 diabetes, and comparison to twice-daily exenatide.
Ingwersen, SH; Jacobsen, LV; Jonker, DM; Watson, E, 2010
)
0.36
" The HA - exendin 4 conjugates will be investigated further as a twice a week injection dosage form for clinical applications."( Long acting hyaluronate--exendin 4 conjugate for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.
Chae, SY; Hahn, SK; Kong, JH; Lee, KC; Oh, EJ, 2010
)
0.36
" After reduction of the metformin dosage (500 mg twice daily) and discontinuance of exenatide as well as a reduction of his physical activity (because of joint pain) for six months, the glucose control worsened."( [Sequential treatment with insulin glargine and metformin, and exenatide in a patient with newly diagnosed type-2 diabetes].
Kress, S, 2010
)
0.36
" Our aim here was to identify a dosing strategy for intraperitoneal (IP) infusion of GLP-1 homologue exendin-4 alone and with PYY(3-36) that produces a sustained reduction in daily food intake and body weight in diet-induced obese (DIO) rats."( Effects of exendin-4 alone and with peptide YY(3-36) on food intake and body weight in diet-induced obese rats.
Anders, KL; Apenteng, BA; Haver, AC; Reidelberger, RD; Steenson, SM, 2011
)
0.37
"To use time trade-off (TTO) to compare patient preferences for profiles of two glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1) products for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (liraglutide and exenatide) that vary on four key attributes - efficacy (as measured by hemoglobin A(1C)), incidence of nausea, incidence of hypoglycemia, and dosing frequency (QD vs."( A comparison of preferences for two GLP-1 products--liraglutide and exenatide--for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.
Conner, C; Hammer, M; McDonald, S; Polster, M; Zanutto, E, 2010
)
0.36
" Estimated preference scores from the conjoint analysis revealed that efficacy measured by hemoglobin A(1C) is the most important attribute, followed by nausea, hypoglycemia, and dosing schedule."( A comparison of preferences for two GLP-1 products--liraglutide and exenatide--for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.
Conner, C; Hammer, M; McDonald, S; Polster, M; Zanutto, E, 2010
)
0.36
" To date, GLP-1 analogs are only available as injectable dosage forms, and its oral delivery is expected to provide physiological portal/peripheral concentration ratios while fostering patient compliance and adherence."( Novel glucagon-like peptide-1 analog delivered orally reduces postprandial glucose excursions in porcine and canine models.
Arbit, E; Eldor, R; Greenberg-Shushlav, Y; Kidron, M, 2010
)
0.36
" Further development of this drug class in an oral dosage form is expected to enhance diabetes control and patient compliance."( Novel glucagon-like peptide-1 analog delivered orally reduces postprandial glucose excursions in porcine and canine models.
Arbit, E; Eldor, R; Greenberg-Shushlav, Y; Kidron, M, 2010
)
0.36
" Average increases in insulin dosage with exenatide and placebo were 13 U/d and 20 U/d."( Use of twice-daily exenatide in Basal insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled trial.
Bergenstal, RM; Buse, JB; Glass, LC; Heilmann, CR; Hoogwerf, BJ; Kwan, AY; Lewis, MS; Rosenstock, J, 2011
)
0.37
" Weekly dosing resulted in steady-state plasma exenatide concentrations after 6-7 weeks."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of exenatide extended-release after single and multiple dosing.
Aisporna, M; Cirincione, B; Diamant, M; Fineman, M; Flanagan, S; Kothare, P; Li, WI; MacConell, L; Mace, KF; Shen, LZ; Taylor, K; Walsh, B, 2011
)
0.37
" Longer-acting GLP-1 agonists are dosed less frequently, appear to be associated with less nausea, and may be associated with better rates of adherence than shorter-acting agents."( Optimizing outcomes for GLP-1 agonists.
Freeman, JS, 2011
)
0.37
" To address the need to directly compare the food intake- and body weight-suppressive effects of these two GLP-1R ligands, acute and chronic dosing experiments were performed."( Comparative effects of the long-acting GLP-1 receptor ligands, liraglutide and exendin-4, on food intake and body weight suppression in rats.
Alhadeff, AL; Grill, HJ; Hayes, MR; Kanoski, SE, 2011
)
0.37
" Finally, the action of GLP-1 on β-cell mass expansion is abolished in both transgenic mice and cultured β-cells with increased dosage of SirT1."( Glucagon-like peptide 1 inhibits the sirtuin deacetylase SirT1 to stimulate pancreatic β-cell mass expansion.
Bastien-Dionne, PO; Buteau, J; Gu, W; Kon, N; Valenti, L, 2011
)
0.37
" Statistically significant reductions in the use or dosage of either oral glucose-lowering medications or insulin after initiating exenatide treatment were found in every observational study that assessed medication changes, including reductions in dosage of up to 75% in sulphonylureas dosages, 22% in metformin, 66% in thiazolidinediones (TZD) or TZD combination therapy and 75% in prandial insulin."( The effects of exenatide bid on metabolic control, medication use and hospitalization in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in clinical practice: a systematic review.
Best, JH; DeYoung, MB; Garrison, LP; Lavillotti, K, 2012
)
0.38
" GLP-1R agonists-which can be dosed to pharmacologic levels-act directly upon the GLP-1R."( The pharmacologic basis for clinical differences among GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors.
Morales, J, 2011
)
0.37
" However, short-term treatment (14 weeks) with liraglutide increased b-cell maximal response capacity in a dose-response fashion."( [Protective effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 on beta-cells: preclinical and clinical data].
Consoli, A; Di Biagio, R, 2011
)
0.37
" After the acute test, rats were dosed bi-daily for 14 days in which period food intake and body weight was monitored."( Liraglutide: short-lived effect on gastric emptying -- long lasting effects on body weight.
Hansen, G; Jelsing, J; Knudsen, LB; Raun, K; Tang-Christensen, M; Vrang, N, 2012
)
0.38
"While both compounds exerted robust acute reductions in GE, the effect was markedly diminished following 14 days of dosing with liraglutide."( Liraglutide: short-lived effect on gastric emptying -- long lasting effects on body weight.
Hansen, G; Jelsing, J; Knudsen, LB; Raun, K; Tang-Christensen, M; Vrang, N, 2012
)
0.38
" These agents allow for less-frequent dosing schedules, improved glycemic control throughout the day, and improved treatment satisfaction compared to some available agents."( Clinical efficacy and safety of once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists in development for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults.
Brackett, A; Harris, K; Tzefos, M, 2012
)
0.38
"Once-weekly GLP-1 agonists provide similar glycemic control with weight reduction, as well as overall higher treatment satisfaction for patients because of their ease of use and need for less-frequent dosing compared to some available agents."( Clinical efficacy and safety of once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists in development for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults.
Brackett, A; Harris, K; Tzefos, M, 2012
)
0.38
" Because of its short t1/2, Css, min could not be detected in any plasma samples prior to daily dosing on days 3-5."( Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of a generic formulation of exenatide: a randomized, open-label, single- and multiple-dose study in healthy Chinese volunteers.
Li, Z; Liu, Y; Shi, S; Wu, J; Zeng, F; Zhou, X, 2012
)
0.38
" Using slow-cleaving linkers, the latter may provide a generic format for once-a-month dosage forms of potent drugs."( Predictable and tunable half-life extension of therapeutic agents by controlled chemical release from macromolecular conjugates.
Ashley, GW; Reid, R; Robinson, L; Santi, DV; Schneider, EL, 2012
)
0.38
" Male and female ZDF rats were dosed for 13 wk with liraglutide (0."( The effects of 13 wk of liraglutide treatment on endocrine and exocrine pancreas in male and female ZDF rats: a quantitative and qualitative analysis revealing no evidence of drug-induced pancreatitis.
Jelsing, J; Jensen, AE; Knudsen, LB; Simonsen, L; Søeborg, H; Thorup, I; Vrang, N, 2012
)
0.38
" Sitagliptin 100 mg daily was substituted, and glipizide was later added and its dosage adjusted over the next several months."( Combination exenatide-sitagliptin therapy used with glipizide in a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Edgerton, LP; Elmore, LK; Patel, MB; Whalin, LM, 2012
)
0.38
" The future may hold interesting developments in terms of reduced dosing frequency, oral formulations and alternative therapeutic uses."( A comparison of currently available GLP-1 receptor agonists for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.
Montanya, E, 2012
)
0.38
" Patients were on a stable dosage of TZD (rosiglitazone or pioglitazone) and, if applicable, metformin."( Safety of exenatide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with a thiazolidinedione alone or in combination with metformin for 2 years.
Boardman, MK; Haber, H; Liutkus, JF; Norwood, P; Pintilei, E; Trautmann, ME, 2012
)
0.38
"Peptide or protein degradation often occurs when water flows into the dosage form."( Effect of water on exenatide acylation in poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres.
Li, X; Li, Y; Liang, R; Liu, W; Shi, Y; Sun, K; Wang, A, 2013
)
0.39
" Many researchers have attempted to prolong the acting time of exenatide by preparing sustained-release dosage forms, modifying its structure, gene therapies, and other means."( Long-acting preparations of exenatide.
Cai, Y; Huang, X; Liu, Z; Ma, L; Tao, A; Wei, L; Yuan, W, 2013
)
0.39
" Compound 10's terminal half-life of ~27 h should translate favorably to weekly dosing in humans."( Bifunctional PEGylated exenatide-amylinomimetic hybrids to treat metabolic disorders: an example of long-acting dual hormonal therapeutics.
Forood, B; Ghosh, SS; Griffin, P; Jodka, CM; Neravetla, S; Parkes, DG; Sun, C; Trevaskis, JL; Wang, Y; Xu, K, 2013
)
0.39
" After dosing for 4 weeks, exenatide, dapagliflozin and exenatide + dapagliflozin similarly decreased haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)."( Combined antidiabetic benefits of exenatide and dapagliflozin in diabetic mice.
D'Souza, LJ; Janssen, S; Parkes, DG; Polizzi, C; Tatarkiewicz, K; Villescaz, C; Wang, Y, 2014
)
0.4
" Furthermore, during light-phase restricted feeding, repeated dosing of exendin-4 at the beginning of the dark phase profoundly influenced both the food intake and daily rhythms of clock gene expression in peripheral tissues."( Indirect effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exendin-4 on the peripheral circadian clocks in mice.
Ando, H; Fujimura, A; Ushijima, K, 2013
)
0.39
" The plasma concentrations of exenatide in serial blood samples were quantified for 56 days after dosing with an exendin-4 fluorescent immunoassay kit."( Pharmacokinetic properties and effects of PT302 after repeated oral glucose loading tests in a dose-escalating study.
Cho, SH; Gu, N; Jang, IJ; Kim, J; Lee, H; Lim, KS; Seol, E; Shin, D; Shin, SG; Yu, KS, 2014
)
0.4
"5-mg, 1-mg, 2-mg, and 4-mg dosage groups of PT302, respectively."( Pharmacokinetic properties and effects of PT302 after repeated oral glucose loading tests in a dose-escalating study.
Cho, SH; Gu, N; Jang, IJ; Kim, J; Lee, H; Lim, KS; Seol, E; Shin, D; Shin, SG; Yu, KS, 2014
)
0.4
" Therefore, we examined 3-mo dosing of exenatide in mice lacking a functional GLP-1R (Glp1r(-/-))."( Long-term metabolic benefits of exenatide in mice are mediated solely via the known glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor.
Parkes, DG; Polizzi, CJ; Sablan, EJ; Tatarkiewicz, K; Villescaz, C, 2014
)
0.4
" Twice-weekly subcutaneously dosed [Leu(14)]exenatide-ABD displayed superior glucose lowering and weight loss in diabetic mice when compared to continuously infused exenatide at the same total weekly dose."( Novel exenatide analogs with peptidic albumin binding domains: potent anti-diabetic agents with extended duration of action.
D'Souza, LJ; Ghosh, SS; Jin, LJ; Jodka, CM; Levy, OE; Mamedova, L; Parkes, DG; Ren, SS; Samant, M; Sharma, A; Soares, CJ; Tatarkiewicz, K; Yuskin, DR, 2014
)
0.4
" Male Zucker Diabetic Fatty (ZDF) rats were dosed for 3 days, fasted overnight and a sucrose/glucose tolerance test was performed."( Effect of linagliptin, alone and in combination with voglibose or exendin-4, on glucose control in male ZDF rats.
Cheetham, SC; Headland, KR; Jones, RB; Klein, T; Mark, M; Vickers, SP, 2014
)
0.4
"A new formulation of exenatide has become available recently that is the first antidiabetic medication for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) dosed on a weekly schedule."( Pathophysiological and pharmacological rationale for the use of exenatide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Grossman, SS, 2014
)
0.4
"Experiment 1 examined the dose-response effects of exendin-4 (0."( Behavioural profile of exendin-4/naltrexone dose combinations in male rats during tests of palatable food consumption.
Rodgers, RJ; Wright, FL, 2014
)
0.4
" It is an attractive option because it is dosed once-weekly, provides A1C lowering similar to liraglutide, weight reduction similar to exenatide, and has an adverse effect profile similar to exenatide and liraglutide."( Dulaglutide: the newest GLP-1 receptor agonist for the management of type 2 diabetes.
Thompson, AM; Trujillo, JM, 2015
)
0.42
" Using hybrid PK/PD model, simulations were done to explore the potential dosing regimens which could achieve likelihood of more pharmacodynamic exposure with respect to FPG and HbA1c over a much shorter period compared with the currently used treatment protocol."( Target-mediated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model based meta-analysis and dosing regimen optimization of a long-acting release formulation of exenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Fan, X; Li, H; Xu, J, 2015
)
0.42
" We found that exendin-4 exerts its effect on failing human islet grafts in a bell-shaped dose-response curve."( The effects of exendin-4 treatment on graft failure: an animal study using a novel re-vascularized minimal human islet transplant model.
Abadpour, S; Foss, A; Gorman, T; Hoeyem, M; Johansson, L; Korsgren, O; Sahraoui, A; Scholz, H; Skrtic, S; Smith, DM; Winzell, MS, 2015
)
0.42
"These data show that d-Ala(8) GLP-1(Lys(37) ) pentasaccharide exerts significant antidiabetic actions and has a projected pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile that merits further evaluation in humans for a possible once-weekly dosing regimen."( Pharmacological characterization and antidiabetic activity of a long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue conjugated to an antithrombin III-binding pentasaccharide.
Bos, ES; de Kort, M; Dokter, WH; Flatt, PR; Irwin, N; Miltenburg, AM; Moffett, RC; Patterson, S, 2015
)
0.42
"We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing any GLP-1 RA licensed for once-weekly dosing (albiglutide, dulaglutide or exenatide extended release) with placebo or other antidiabetic agents."( Efficacy and safety of once-weekly glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists for the management of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Athanasiadou, E; Bekiari, E; Boura, P; Karagiannis, T; Liakos, A; Mainou, M; Matthews, DR; Paschos, P; Rika, M; Tsapas, A; Vasilakou, D, 2015
)
0.42
"Given their dosing scheme and overall efficacy and safety profile, once-weekly GLP-1 RAs are a convenient therapeutic option for use as add-on to metformin."( Efficacy and safety of once-weekly glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists for the management of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Athanasiadou, E; Bekiari, E; Boura, P; Karagiannis, T; Liakos, A; Mainou, M; Matthews, DR; Paschos, P; Rika, M; Tsapas, A; Vasilakou, D, 2015
)
0.42
" Differences may be due to dosing device differences for exenatide QW and liraglutide, which, in the case of liraglutide, allows the opportunity for daily self-titration dosing."( Liraglutide Versus Exenatide Once Weekly: Persistence, Adherence, and Early Discontinuation.
Fernandez Lando, L; Kabul, S; Swindle, RW; Xie, J; Yu, M, 2016
)
0.43
" Pharmacokinetic simulations indicate that the hydrogel-exenatide microspheres should support weekly or biweekly subcutaneous dosing in humans."( Hydrogel Drug Delivery System Using Self-Cleaving Covalent Linkers for Once-a-Week Administration of Exenatide.
Ashley, GW; Henise, J; Reid, R; Santi, DV; Schneider, EL, 2016
)
0.43
" Exenatide was given using standard diabetes dosing without dietary modifications."( Effects of exenatide on weight and appetite in overweight adolescents and young adults with Prader-Willi syndrome.
Azen, CG; Geffner, ME; Hsu, I; Jeandron, D; Mittelman, SD; Salehi, P, 2017
)
0.46
"After run-in on metformin and basal-bolus insulin (BBI), 102 participants continued metformin and basal insulin and were randomized to exenatide dosing before the two largest meals (glucacon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist and insulin [GLIPULIN group]) or continuation of rapid-acting insulin analogs (BBI group)."( Glucose Variability in a 26-Week Randomized Comparison of Mealtime Treatment With Rapid-Acting Insulin Versus GLP-1 Agonist in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes at High Cardiovascular Risk.
, 2016
)
0.43
"0001), regardless of dosage and population, was achieved by the obese or overweight patients in exenatide group."( Exenatide in obese or overweight patients without diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.
Du, H; Kwong, JS; Li, J; Li, L; Li, Q; Li, S; Li, Y; Ren, K; Su, N; Sun, X; Tian, H; Xu, T, 2016
)
0.43
" In addition, GCMs had a longer interval between dosing (two weeks) and a lower dosage(2."( Effects of Pluronic F127-PEG multi-gel-core on the release profile and pharmacodynamics of Exenatide loaded in PLGA microspheres.
Cai, C; Gong, H; Gou, J; Ren, T; Tang, X; Wang, P; Wang, Q; Zhang, Y, 2016
)
0.43
"Forty clean NOD mice were randomly divided into four groups (in each group, n = 10): One is blank control group D which is intervened with normal saline, and the other three groups were divided into low-dose group A, middle-dose group B, and high-dose group C according to the different exendin-4 dosage 2, 4, and 8 μg/kg·d."( Influence and significance of intervening diabetes microRNA expression profile of NOD mice with exendin-4.
Fang, YL; He, JS; Lian, CW; Wu, JZ; Ye, XL; Zhu, SB, 2016
)
0.43
" The effects of exenatide were examined on the following prespecified covariates within the first 6 hours from study drug initiation: lactate level, blood glucose level, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and combined dosage of norepinephrine and dopamine."( The Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Analog Exenatide Increases Blood Glucose Clearance, Lactate Clearance, and Heart Rate in Comatose Patients After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.
Engstrøm, T; Frydland, M; Hassager, C; Høfsten, DE; Kjaergaard, J; Køber, L; Lindholm, MG; Møller, JE; Schmidt, H; Thomsen, JH; Wiberg, S; Winther-Jensen, M, 2018
)
0.48
" This pharmacokinetic disadvantage has largely restricted the development of noninvasive dosage forms of biologics that deliver into systemic circulation."( Biocompatible Polymers Modified with d-Octaarginine as an Absorption Enhancer for Nasal Peptide Delivery.
Fujii, K; Higashitarumi, S; Hiwatari, KI; Ishizaki, S; Kobayashi, H; Kumagai, H; Miyata, K; Mohri, K; Ochiai, K; Sakuma, S; Shigeno, K; Tanishita, S; Tobita, E; Tsubaki, K; Ukawa, M; Yamada, M, 2018
)
0.48
" The favorable safety profiles of OW GLP-1 RAs, added to their efficacy and the favorable weekly dosing regimen, make these agents appropriate options for patients with T2D."( Safety of Once-weekly Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
Frias, JP, 2018
)
0.48
" An optimal exendin-4 treatment dosing regimen was identified, where four high doses (0."( Neuroprotective exendin-4 enhances hypothermia therapy in a model of hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy.
Carlsson, Y; Hagberg, H; Jonsdotter, A; Leverin, AL; Nair, S; Poupon, L; Rahim, AA; Rocha-Ferreira, E; Thornton, C; Zelco, A, 2018
)
0.48
" In contrast, treatment with comparable dosing of des-acyl ghrelin failed to significantly impact metabolic activity."( Exendin-4 antagonizes the metabolic action of acylated ghrelinergic signaling in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus.
Abtahi, S; Bastacky, JMR; Currie, PJ; Dunn, DP; Howell, E; Salvucci, JT, 2019
)
0.51
" This convenient single, sustained-release dosing regimen also has application for other neurological disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, multiple system atrophy and multiple sclerosis where prior preclinical studies, likewise, have demonstrated positive Exenatide actions."( Pharmacokinetics and efficacy of PT302, a sustained-release Exenatide formulation, in a murine model of mild traumatic brain injury.
Bader, M; Choi, HI; Glotfelty, E; Greig, NH; Hoffer, BJ; Kim, DS; Kim, HK; Lecca, D; Li, Y; Pick, CG; Rachmany, L; Rubovitch, V; Tweedie, D, 2019
)
0.51
"c dosing with the combination of PYY(3-36) (200 μg/kg) and Ex4 (2."( PYY(3-36) and exendin-4 reduce food intake and activate neuronal circuits in a synergistic manner in mice.
Kjaergaard, M; Raun, K; Rehfeld, JF; Salinas, CBG; Secher, A; Wulff, BS, 2019
)
0.51
" The results showed that acute pharmacological dosage of GLP-1RA (Liraglutide or Exenatide) could significantly influence food intake."( Comparative study on anorexigenic effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in rats.
Gong, M; Jin, JL; Nguyen, T; Wang, CX; Wen, S; Xiao, WZ; Zhou, LG, 2019
)
0.51
" GLP-1 RA dosing varies from once weekly to twice daily, and the class is well tolerated in patients with type 2 diabetes."( Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists in type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Brooks, A; Guyton, J; Jeon, M, 2019
)
0.51
" In a dose-response comparison, DA-CH5 was more effective than the GLP-1 receptor agonist exendin-4."( The Novel Dual GLP-1/GIP Receptor Agonist DA-CH5 Is Superior to Single GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in the MPTP Model of Parkinson's Disease.
Hölscher, C; Li, L; Li, Y; Melchiorsen, JU; Rosenkilde, M; Zhang, L, 2020
)
0.56
"Seventy subjects were randomly assigned to 8 incremental dosage groups (2, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 200 and 400 µg)."( Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Single Dose Polyethylene Glycolated Exenatide Injection (PB-119) in Healthy Volunteers.
Cui, H; Li, Y; Liu, Y; Lv, Y; Tian, JH; Wei, MJ; Xia, YH; Zhang, P; Zhao, CY; Zhu, Y, 2020
)
0.56
" Because Exendin-4 (Ex-4) displays similar functional properties to native GLP-1, we used this agonist to perform a dose-response study on progressive motility and cholesterol efflux, showing that 300 pM Ex-4 was the most effective treatment."( Human Sperm Express the Receptor for Glucagon-like Peptide-1 (GLP-1), Which Affects Sperm Function and Metabolism.
Andò, S; Aquila, S; D'Agata, R; De Rose, D; Malivindi, R; Panza, S; Rago, V; Santoro, M, 2020
)
0.56
" Most recommendations for drug usage and dosage are based on collective clinical experience."( Ultrasonographic assessment of the effect of metoclopramide, erythromycin, and exenatide on solid-phase gastric emptying in healthy cats.
Fletcher, JM; Gaschen, FP; Gaschen, L; Husnik, R, 2020
)
0.56
"A total of 30 trials were identified for inclusion; eight were head-to-head trials involving another GLP-1 RA; of these, six compared GLP-1 RAs with different dosing regimens (QW vs once-daily or twice-daily), and two were direct QW vs QW GLP-1 RA comparisons."( Safety and tolerability of once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes.
Trujillo, J, 2020
)
0.56
" Furthermore, chronic dosing of HEX15 significantly ameliorated the manifestations of diabetes in the db/db mice, including body weight, food intake, glycometabolism as well as hyperlipemia."( Albumin-binding tag derived Exendin-4 analogue for treating hyperglycemia and diabetic complications.
Fang, D; Li, H; Wang, F; Wang, Y; Xu, S, 2022
)
0.72
"To establish the impact of sex, dosing route, fasting duration and acute habituation stress on glucose tolerance test (GTT) measurements used in the preclinical evaluation of potential glucose-modulating therapeutics."( The glucose tolerance test in mice: Sex, drugs and protocol.
Chapple, S; Kennard, MR; King, AJ; Nandi, M, 2022
)
0.72
"As low-temperature storage and transportation of peptides require high costs, improving the dosage form of peptides can reduce costs."( Thermal stability of exenatide encapsulated in stratified dissolving microneedles during storage.
Cheng, A; Gao, Y; Liu, H; Meng, F; Wang, B; Xing, M; Xu, B; Yan, C; Yang, G; Zhang, S, 2023
)
0.91
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Protein Targets (4)

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)0.00010.00010.50011.0000AID475807
Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.00230.00010.00310.0140AID1708347; AID1874888; AID385217
Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)Ki0.00010.00010.00270.0063AID1911939; AID1911940
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Activation Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptorMus musculus (house mouse)EC50 (µMol)0.00000.00000.00000.0000AID1483062
Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)0.05260.00000.04170.7943AID1066039; AID1392277; AID1483054; AID1498065; AID1601241; AID1708340; AID1874889; AID1874890; AID1874891; AID1874892; AID1911919; AID1911921; AID1911922; AID1911934; AID1911936; AID385218; AID494632
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (13)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
cell surface receptor signaling pathwayGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
activation of adenylate cyclase activityGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cytosolic calcium ion concentrationGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
learning or memoryGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart contractionGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cAMP-mediated signalingGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
post-translational protein targeting to membrane, translocationGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of blood pressureGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
hormone secretionGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucagon stimulusGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to psychosocial stressGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of blood pressureGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (5)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
transmembrane signaling receptor activityGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor activityGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
peptide hormone bindingGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
glucagon receptor activityGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (2)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
plasma membraneGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)
plasma membraneGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
membraneGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (145)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1068435Antioxidant activity in STZ-induced mouse model assessed as MDA level at 1 umol/kg, ip administered for 20 days measured on day 21 (Rvb = 12.49 +/- 1.35 nmol/ml)2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-12, Volume: 73Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel peptide MC62 analogues as potential antihyperglycemic agents.
AID1874897Agonist activity at human GLP-1R expressed in CHO cells coexpressing beta-arrestin-2 assessed as increase in beta arrestin-2 recruitment by measuring maximum efficacy incubated for 1 hr by chemiluminescence based pathHunter assay relative to GLP12022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-08, Volume: 65, Issue:17
Modifying a Hydroxyl Patch in Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Produces Biased Agonists with Unique Signaling Profiles.
AID475806Binding affinity to human serum albumin at 100 ug/mL in phosphate buffer saline after 2 hrs2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-12, Volume: 52, Issue:21
Preparation and structural, biochemical, and pharmaceutical characterizations of bile acid-modified long-acting exendin-4 derivatives.
AID1392281Hypoglycemic activity in STZ-induced diabetic Kunming mouse model assessed as time required to reduce blood glucose level of 8.35 nmol/L at 25 nmol/kg, ip administered as single dose2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 05-15, Volume: 26, Issue:9
Novel fatty acid chain modified GLP-1 derivatives with prolonged in vivo glucose-lowering ability and balanced glucoregulatory activity.
AID1874890Agonist activity at human GLP-1R expressed in CHO cells coexpressing beta-arrestin-2 assessed as stimulation intracellular calcium mobilization measured after 180 secs by Fluo-3-AM dye based fluorescence assay2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-08, Volume: 65, Issue:17
Modifying a Hydroxyl Patch in Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Produces Biased Agonists with Unique Signaling Profiles.
AID1066035Antidiabetic activity in Sprague-Dawley rat assessed as increase of plasma insulin level at 25 nmol/kg, ip administered 0.5 hrs prior to glucose challenge measured at 45 mins by ELISA2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-27, Volume: 56, Issue:24
Design, synthesis, and biological activity of novel dicoumarol glucagon-like peptide 1 conjugates.
AID1068436Antioxidant activity in STZ-induced mouse model assessed as SOD level at 1 umol/kg, ip administered for 20 days measured on day 21 (Rvb = 41.58 +/- 2.89 U/ml)2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-12, Volume: 73Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel peptide MC62 analogues as potential antihyperglycemic agents.
AID447511Cmax in insulin-resistant ob/ob mouse at 1 nmol/kg, sc up to 24 hrs by LC-MS/MS analysis2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-10, Volume: 52, Issue:23
Eleven amino acid glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists with antidiabetic activity.
AID1066040Antidiabetic activity in Sprague-Dawley rat assessed as increase of plasma insulin level at 25 nmol/kg, ip administered 0.5 hrs prior to glucose challenge measured at 15 mins by ELISA2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-27, Volume: 56, Issue:24
Design, synthesis, and biological activity of novel dicoumarol glucagon-like peptide 1 conjugates.
AID1066029Elimination half life in Sprague-Dawley rat at 15 nmol/kg, sc by LC-MS/MS analysis2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-27, Volume: 56, Issue:24
Design, synthesis, and biological activity of novel dicoumarol glucagon-like peptide 1 conjugates.
AID1498066Agonist activity at human glucagon receptor expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as cAMP accumulation after 30 mins by HTRF assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-12, Volume: 61, Issue:13
Dual Glucagon-like Peptide 1 (GLP-1)/Glucagon Receptor Agonists Specifically Optimized for Multidose Formulations.
AID748318Potentiation of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in human pancreatic islets at 1 uM2013ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-13, Volume: 4, Issue:6
Discovery and Optimization of Potent GPR40 Full Agonists Containing Tricyclic Spirocycles.
AID1601241Agonist activity at human GLP1 receptor expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as induction of cAMP levels after 20 mins by time-resolved fluorescence analysis2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-15, Volume: 27, Issue:20
Novel lipid side chain modified exenatide analogs emerged prolonged glucoregulatory activity and potential body weight management properties.
AID418684Antidiabetic activity in po dosed type 2 diabetes mellitus patient assessed as reduction in HbA1C level in pancreas2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-09, Volume: 52, Issue:7
Development of the renal glucose reabsorption inhibitors: a new mechanism for the pharmacotherapy of diabetes mellitus type 2.
AID1601242Half life in Sprague-Dawley rat plasma at 1000 ng/ml measured up to 72 hrs by UPLC-MS/MS analysis2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-15, Volume: 27, Issue:20
Novel lipid side chain modified exenatide analogs emerged prolonged glucoregulatory activity and potential body weight management properties.
AID475811Insulinotropic activity in 16.7 mM glucose-stimulated Sprague-Dawley rat islets of langerhans assessed as insulin release per 20 islets at 10 nM treated for 2 hrs after glucose challenge measured after 2 hrs of glucose stimulation by EIA (Rvb = 58.32 +/- 2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-12, Volume: 52, Issue:21
Preparation and structural, biochemical, and pharmaceutical characterizations of bile acid-modified long-acting exendin-4 derivatives.
AID1601243Antidiabetic activity in STZ-induced diabetic Kunming mouse assessed as decrease in postprandial blood glucose level at 25 nmol/kg, ip pretreated with STZ for 5 consecutive days and measured up to 48 hrs post induction by glucometric analysis (Rvb > 16.7 2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-15, Volume: 27, Issue:20
Novel lipid side chain modified exenatide analogs emerged prolonged glucoregulatory activity and potential body weight management properties.
AID475817Tmax in cannulated Sprague-Dawley rat at 10 nmol, sc by EIA2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-12, Volume: 52, Issue:21
Preparation and structural, biochemical, and pharmaceutical characterizations of bile acid-modified long-acting exendin-4 derivatives.
AID475828Antidiabetic activity in C57BL/6 db/db mouse assessed as decrease in glucose AUC at 15 nmol/kg, sc administered as single dose measured after 24 hrs by glucometry2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-12, Volume: 52, Issue:21
Preparation and structural, biochemical, and pharmaceutical characterizations of bile acid-modified long-acting exendin-4 derivatives.
AID1601253Hepatoprotective activity against STZ-induced diabetic Kunming mouse assessed as reduction in AST levels at 25 nmol/kg, ip qd administered for 3 weeks and measured at day 242019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-15, Volume: 27, Issue:20
Novel lipid side chain modified exenatide analogs emerged prolonged glucoregulatory activity and potential body weight management properties.
AID1639345Antiobesity activity in C57BL/6J mouse model of diet-induced obesity assessed as reduction in circulating leptin level at 25 nmol/kg, ip qd for 4 weeks2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 04-15, Volume: 27, Issue:8
Novel nonapeptide GLP (28-36) amide derivatives with improved hypoglycemic and body weight lowering effects.
AID1708352Suppression of cumulative food intake in lean Sprague-Dawley rat at 10 to 20 nmol/kg per dosed daily for 8 days2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 01-28, Volume: 64, Issue:2
Design and Evaluation of Peptide Dual-Agonists of GLP-1 and NPY2 Receptors for Glucoregulation and Weight Loss with Mitigated Nausea and Emesis.
AID1708338Toxicity in lean Sprague-Dawley rat assessed as induction of emesis at 0.3 to 60 nmol/kg dosed daily for 2 days by kaolin consumption assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 01-28, Volume: 64, Issue:2
Design and Evaluation of Peptide Dual-Agonists of GLP-1 and NPY2 Receptors for Glucoregulation and Weight Loss with Mitigated Nausea and Emesis.
AID385217Displacement of [125I]GLP1 from human GLP1R expressed in CHOK1 cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-08, Volume: 51, Issue:9
Design and synthesis of conformationally constrained glucagon-like peptide-1 derivatives with increased plasma stability and prolonged in vivo activity.
AID1911935Agonist activity at human GLP-1R expressed in PathHunter CHO-K1 GLP1R beta-arrestin-1 cell assessed as induction of beta-arrestin 1 recruitment by measuring maximum efficacy incubated for 90 mins by pathHunter assay relative to control2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-23, Volume: 65, Issue:12
A Small-Molecule Oral Agonist of the Human Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor.
AID758130Toxicity in type 2 diabetes patient assessed as gastro-intestinal side effects at 10 ug, bid up to 104 weeks2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-15, Volume: 23, Issue:14
Recent progress and future options in the development of GLP-1 receptor agonists for the treatment of diabesity.
AID475820Elimination half life in cannulated Sprague-Dawley rat at 10 nmol, sc by EIA2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-12, Volume: 52, Issue:21
Preparation and structural, biochemical, and pharmaceutical characterizations of bile acid-modified long-acting exendin-4 derivatives.
AID494632Agonist activity at human GLP-1 receptor expressed in CHO cells assessed as increase in cAMP production2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-01, Volume: 20, Issue:15
Identification of glycosylated exendin-4 analogue with prolonged blood glucose-lowering activity through glycosylation scanning substitution.
AID475822Apparent oral clearance in cannulated Sprague-Dawley rat at 10 nmol, sc after 4 hrs by EIA2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-12, Volume: 52, Issue:21
Preparation and structural, biochemical, and pharmaceutical characterizations of bile acid-modified long-acting exendin-4 derivatives.
AID475819AUC in cannulated Sprague-Dawley rat at 10 nmol, sc after 4 hrs by EIA2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-12, Volume: 52, Issue:21
Preparation and structural, biochemical, and pharmaceutical characterizations of bile acid-modified long-acting exendin-4 derivatives.
AID1708347Displacement of GLP-1-red from human GLP-1R expressed in CHO-K1 cells by fluorescent competitive binding assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 01-28, Volume: 64, Issue:2
Design and Evaluation of Peptide Dual-Agonists of GLP-1 and NPY2 Receptors for Glucoregulation and Weight Loss with Mitigated Nausea and Emesis.
AID294991Insulinotropic activity in RIN5F cells assessed as stimulation of glucose-dependent insulin secretion per ug of protein at 1 uM2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 15, Issue:9
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of substituted-N-(thieno[2,3-b]pyridin-3-yl)-guanidines, N-(1H-pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridin-3-yl)-guanidines, and N-(1H-indol-3-yl)-guanidines.
AID1708350Half life in Sprague-Dawley rat liver microsomes at 30 uM in presence of NADPH by HPLC analysis2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 01-28, Volume: 64, Issue:2
Design and Evaluation of Peptide Dual-Agonists of GLP-1 and NPY2 Receptors for Glucoregulation and Weight Loss with Mitigated Nausea and Emesis.
AID475808Displacement of [125I]exendin-4 from GLP1 receptor in rat RINm5F cells at 10 nM after 2 hrs by gamma counting2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-12, Volume: 52, Issue:21
Preparation and structural, biochemical, and pharmaceutical characterizations of bile acid-modified long-acting exendin-4 derivatives.
AID1639332Cytoprotective activity against H2O2-induced oxidative stress-mediated cell death in rat INS-1 cells assessed as reduction in apoptotic cells at 10 uM after 24 hrs by Annexin V/propidium iodide staining-based flow cytometric analysis2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 04-15, Volume: 27, Issue:8
Novel nonapeptide GLP (28-36) amide derivatives with improved hypoglycemic and body weight lowering effects.
AID1911940Displacement of [3H]PF-06883365 from FAP-tagged human GLP-1R expressed in CHO cells assessed as inhibition constant by radioligand binding assay2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-23, Volume: 65, Issue:12
A Small-Molecule Oral Agonist of the Human Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor.
AID1068431Inhibition of palmitate-induced apoptosis in mouse MIN6 cells assessed as reduction of apoptotic cells at 10 nM preincubated for 24 hrs followed by palmitate challenge measured after 1 hr by Hoechst 33342 staining-based microscopic analysis2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-12, Volume: 73Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel peptide MC62 analogues as potential antihyperglycemic agents.
AID1708349Stimulation of glucose stimulated insulin secretion in rat pancreatic islets at 50 nM in presence of 3 mM glucose incubated for 60 mins2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 01-28, Volume: 64, Issue:2
Design and Evaluation of Peptide Dual-Agonists of GLP-1 and NPY2 Receptors for Glucoregulation and Weight Loss with Mitigated Nausea and Emesis.
AID1465192Agonist activity at GLP1 receptor in mouse BetaTC6 cells assessed as increase in insulin secretion at 10'-12 to 10'-5 M after 120 mins by sandwich ELISA2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 11-15, Volume: 27, Issue:22
Synthesis and in vitro biological evaluation of new pyrimidines as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists.
AID475825Antidiabetic activity in C57BL/6 db/db mouse assessed as normalization of blood glucose level at 15 nmol/kg, sc administered as single dose measured after 8 hrs by glucometry2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-12, Volume: 52, Issue:21
Preparation and structural, biochemical, and pharmaceutical characterizations of bile acid-modified long-acting exendin-4 derivatives.
AID447504Antidiabetic activity in insulin-resistant ob/ob mouse assessed as reduction in plasma glucose level at 1 nmol/kg, sc administered 30 mins before glucose infusion measured after 30 to 180 mins of glucose challenge by intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-10, Volume: 52, Issue:23
Eleven amino acid glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists with antidiabetic activity.
AID1066030AUC (0 to infinity) in Sprague-Dawley rat at 15 nmol/kg, sc by LC-MS/MS analysis2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-27, Volume: 56, Issue:24
Design, synthesis, and biological activity of novel dicoumarol glucagon-like peptide 1 conjugates.
AID294992Insulinotropic activity in RIN5F cells assessed as stimulation of glucose-dependent insulin secretion per microgram of protein at 10 uM2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 15, Issue:9
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of substituted-N-(thieno[2,3-b]pyridin-3-yl)-guanidines, N-(1H-pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridin-3-yl)-guanidines, and N-(1H-indol-3-yl)-guanidines.
AID475814Antidiabetic activity in overnight fasted db/db mouse assessed as blood glucose level at 10 nmol/kg, sc administered 30 mins prior to glucose challenge measured after 30 mins by IPGTT (Rvb = 20.96 +/- 2.20 nM)2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-12, Volume: 52, Issue:21
Preparation and structural, biochemical, and pharmaceutical characterizations of bile acid-modified long-acting exendin-4 derivatives.
AID447508Antidiabetic activity in insulin-resistant ob/ob mouse assessed as increase in plasma insulin level at 1 nmol/kg, sc administered 30 mins before glucose infusion measured after 30 mins of glucose challenge by intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-10, Volume: 52, Issue:23
Eleven amino acid glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists with antidiabetic activity.
AID1066038Half life in Sprague-Dawley rat plasma at 1000 ng/mL by LC-MS/MS analysis2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-27, Volume: 56, Issue:24
Design, synthesis, and biological activity of novel dicoumarol glucagon-like peptide 1 conjugates.
AID1066027Hypoglycemic activity in C57BL/6J-m+/+Leprdb (db/db) mouse assessed as reduction of plasma glucose level at 25 nmol/kg, ip administered 0.5 hrs prior to glucose challenge measured up to 5 hrs by IPGTT2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-27, Volume: 56, Issue:24
Design, synthesis, and biological activity of novel dicoumarol glucagon-like peptide 1 conjugates.
AID1911924Agonist activity at human GLP-1R expressed in CHO-K1 cells assessed as cAMP accumulation by measuring maximal efficacy at 20 uM incubated for 30 mins in absence of BETP by plate reader method relative to control2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-23, Volume: 65, Issue:12
A Small-Molecule Oral Agonist of the Human Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor.
AID1068446Antihyperglycemic activity in overnight fasted STZ-induced diabetic mouse model assessed as blood glucose level at 0.03 umol/kg, ip qd administered for 20 days measured after 20 days relative to control2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-12, Volume: 73Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel peptide MC62 analogues as potential antihyperglycemic agents.
AID475813Antidiabetic activity in overnight fasted db/db mouse assessed as increase in glucose tolerance at 10 nmol/kg, sc administered 30 mins prior to glucose challenge measured after 120 mins by IPGTT2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-12, Volume: 52, Issue:21
Preparation and structural, biochemical, and pharmaceutical characterizations of bile acid-modified long-acting exendin-4 derivatives.
AID475824Antidiabetic activity in C57BL/6 db/db mouse assessed as normalization of blood glucose level at 15 nmol/kg, sc administered as single dose measured after 6 hrs by glucometry2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-12, Volume: 52, Issue:21
Preparation and structural, biochemical, and pharmaceutical characterizations of bile acid-modified long-acting exendin-4 derivatives.
AID1392288Cytoprotective activity against H2O2-induced glucolipotoxicity in rat INS-1 cells assessed as reduction in apoptosis at 10 nM after 24 hrs by Annexin-V-FITC/propidium iodide staining based flow cytometric analysis2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 05-15, Volume: 26, Issue:9
Novel fatty acid chain modified GLP-1 derivatives with prolonged in vivo glucose-lowering ability and balanced glucoregulatory activity.
AID1874891Agonist activity at human GLP-1R assessed as increase in ERK1/2 phosphorylation at Thr202/Tyr204 residues incubated for 20 mins by AlphaLISA assay2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-08, Volume: 65, Issue:17
Modifying a Hydroxyl Patch in Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Produces Biased Agonists with Unique Signaling Profiles.
AID1601255Anti-obesity activity in 12 hrs fasted diet-induced obese C57BL/6J mouse assessed as reduction in food intake at 25 nmol/kg, ip measured up to 360 mins2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-15, Volume: 27, Issue:20
Novel lipid side chain modified exenatide analogs emerged prolonged glucoregulatory activity and potential body weight management properties.
AID758129Half life in human2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-15, Volume: 23, Issue:14
Recent progress and future options in the development of GLP-1 receptor agonists for the treatment of diabesity.
AID1066028Mean residence time in Sprague-Dawley rat at 15 nmol/kg, sc by LC-MS/MS analysis2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-27, Volume: 56, Issue:24
Design, synthesis, and biological activity of novel dicoumarol glucagon-like peptide 1 conjugates.
AID758122Antidiabetic activity in type 2 diabetes patient assessed as reduction of HbA1c at 10 ug, bid after 26 weeks relative to control2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-15, Volume: 23, Issue:14
Recent progress and future options in the development of GLP-1 receptor agonists for the treatment of diabesity.
AID1392275Half life in Sprague-Dawley rat plasma by LC-MS/MS analysis2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 05-15, Volume: 26, Issue:9
Novel fatty acid chain modified GLP-1 derivatives with prolonged in vivo glucose-lowering ability and balanced glucoregulatory activity.
AID1601250Antidiabetic activity against STZ-induced diabetic Kunming mouse assessed as reduction in HbA1c level at 25 nmol/kg, ip qd administered for 3 weeks and measured after 24 days2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-15, Volume: 27, Issue:20
Novel lipid side chain modified exenatide analogs emerged prolonged glucoregulatory activity and potential body weight management properties.
AID1639333Cytoprotective activity against STZ-mediated cell death in rat INS-1 cells assessed as reduction in apoptotic cells at 10 uM after 24 hrs by Annexin V/propidium iodide staining-based flow cytometric analysis2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 04-15, Volume: 27, Issue:8
Novel nonapeptide GLP (28-36) amide derivatives with improved hypoglycemic and body weight lowering effects.
AID1911936Agonist activity at human GLP-1R expressed in PathHunter CHO-K1 GLP1R beta-arrestin-2 cell assessed as induction of beta-arrestin 2 recruitment incubated for 90 mins by pathHunter assay2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-23, Volume: 65, Issue:12
A Small-Molecule Oral Agonist of the Human Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor.
AID1639342Antiobesity activity in C57BL/6J mouse model of diet-induced obesity assessed as reduction in body weight at 25 nmol/kg, ip qd for 4 weeks2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 04-15, Volume: 27, Issue:8
Novel nonapeptide GLP (28-36) amide derivatives with improved hypoglycemic and body weight lowering effects.
AID475807Displacement of [125I]exendin-4 from GLP1 receptor in rat RINm5F cells after 2 hrs by gamma counting2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-12, Volume: 52, Issue:21
Preparation and structural, biochemical, and pharmaceutical characterizations of bile acid-modified long-acting exendin-4 derivatives.
AID385218Agonist activity at human GLP1R expressed in CHO cells assessed as increase in cAMP level by cAMP-response element/luciferase activation assay2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-08, Volume: 51, Issue:9
Design and synthesis of conformationally constrained glucagon-like peptide-1 derivatives with increased plasma stability and prolonged in vivo activity.
AID1662694Agonist activity at human GPR146 receptor expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as recruitment of beta-arrestin by Path Hunter assay2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 07-01, Volume: 30, Issue:13
Is GPR146 really the receptor for proinsulin C-peptide?
AID1392287Cytoprotective activity against STZ-induced oxidative stress in rat INS-1 cells assessed as reduction in apoptosis at 10 nM after 24 hrs by Annexin-V-FITC/propidium iodide staining based flow cytometric analysis2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 05-15, Volume: 26, Issue:9
Novel fatty acid chain modified GLP-1 derivatives with prolonged in vivo glucose-lowering ability and balanced glucoregulatory activity.
AID1392277Agonist activity at recombinant human GLP1 receptor expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as cAMP accumulation by TR-FRET assay2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 05-15, Volume: 26, Issue:9
Novel fatty acid chain modified GLP-1 derivatives with prolonged in vivo glucose-lowering ability and balanced glucoregulatory activity.
AID1483054Agonist activity at human GLP-1 receptor expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as cAMP accumulation after 30 mins by HTRF assay2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-25, Volume: 60, Issue:10
Design of Novel Exendin-Based Dual Glucagon-like Peptide 1 (GLP-1)/Glucagon Receptor Agonists.
AID1474166Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring severity class index2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID447509Antidiabetic activity in insulin-resistant ob/ob mouse assessed as increase in plasma insulin level at 1 nmol/kg, sc administered 30 mins before glucose infusion measured after 60 mins of glucose challenge by intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-10, Volume: 52, Issue:23
Eleven amino acid glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists with antidiabetic activity.
AID1392292Antidiabetic activity in C57BL/6 mouse assessed as reduction in blood glucose level at 25 nmol/kg, ip treated 30 mins prior to glucose challenge measured after 120 mins by IPGTT2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 05-15, Volume: 26, Issue:9
Novel fatty acid chain modified GLP-1 derivatives with prolonged in vivo glucose-lowering ability and balanced glucoregulatory activity.
AID1708348Stimulation of glucose stimulated insulin secretion in rat pancreatic islets at 50 nM in presence of 10 mM glucose incubated for 60 mins2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 01-28, Volume: 64, Issue:2
Design and Evaluation of Peptide Dual-Agonists of GLP-1 and NPY2 Receptors for Glucoregulation and Weight Loss with Mitigated Nausea and Emesis.
AID1601248Antidiabetic activity against STZ-induced diabetic Kunming mouse assessed as reduction in cumulative water intake at 25 nmol/kg, ip qd administered for 3 weeks and measured every day2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-15, Volume: 27, Issue:20
Novel lipid side chain modified exenatide analogs emerged prolonged glucoregulatory activity and potential body weight management properties.
AID475812Insulinotropic activity in 2.2 mM glucose-stimulated Sprague-Dawley rat islets of langerhans assessed as insulin release per 20 islets at 10 nM treated for 2 hrs after glucose challenge measured after 2 hrs of glucose stimulation by EIA2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-12, Volume: 52, Issue:21
Preparation and structural, biochemical, and pharmaceutical characterizations of bile acid-modified long-acting exendin-4 derivatives.
AID475821Apparent volume of distribution with respect to bioavailability in cannulated Sprague-Dawley rat at 10 nmol, sc after 4 hrs by EIA2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-12, Volume: 52, Issue:21
Preparation and structural, biochemical, and pharmaceutical characterizations of bile acid-modified long-acting exendin-4 derivatives.
AID1601258Antidiabetic activity in Sprague-Dawley rat assessed as decrease in glucose level at 25 nmol/kg, ip pretreated for 30 mins followed by glucose challenge and measured up to 180 mins by OGTT relative to control2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-15, Volume: 27, Issue:20
Novel lipid side chain modified exenatide analogs emerged prolonged glucoregulatory activity and potential body weight management properties.
AID1911919Agonist activity at human GLP-1R expressed in CHO-K1 cells assessed as cAMP accumulation incubated for 30 mins in absence of BETP by plate reader method2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-23, Volume: 65, Issue:12
A Small-Molecule Oral Agonist of the Human Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor.
AID1708341Agonist activity at human NPY2R expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as inhibition of adenosine-induced stimulation of cAMP accumulation by FRET assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 01-28, Volume: 64, Issue:2
Design and Evaluation of Peptide Dual-Agonists of GLP-1 and NPY2 Receptors for Glucoregulation and Weight Loss with Mitigated Nausea and Emesis.
AID1068438Antihyperglycemic activity in overnight fasted STZ-induced mouse model assessed as decrease in glycated haemoglobin level at 0.03 umol/kg, ip administered for 20 days measured on day 212014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-12, Volume: 73Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel peptide MC62 analogues as potential antihyperglycemic agents.
AID1392274Binding affinity to human serum albumin after 3 hrs by LC-MS/MS analysis2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 05-15, Volume: 26, Issue:9
Novel fatty acid chain modified GLP-1 derivatives with prolonged in vivo glucose-lowering ability and balanced glucoregulatory activity.
AID1911937Agonist activity at human GLP-1R expressed in PathHunter CHO-K1 GLP1R beta-arrestin-2 cell assessed as induction of beta-arrestin 2 recruitment by measuring maximum efficacy incubated for 90 mins by pathHunter assay relative to control2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-23, Volume: 65, Issue:12
A Small-Molecule Oral Agonist of the Human Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor.
AID1066016Antidiabetic activity in C57BL/6J-m+/+Leprdb (db/db) mouse assessed as reduction of blood glucose AUC (0 to 48 hrs) at 25 nmol/kg, ip administered for 0.5 hrs2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-27, Volume: 56, Issue:24
Design, synthesis, and biological activity of novel dicoumarol glucagon-like peptide 1 conjugates.
AID1601252Hepatoprotective activity against STZ-induced diabetic Kunming mouse assessed as reduction in ALT levels at 25 nmol/kg, ip qd administered for 3 weeks and measured at day 242019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-15, Volume: 27, Issue:20
Novel lipid side chain modified exenatide analogs emerged prolonged glucoregulatory activity and potential body weight management properties.
AID1911922Agonist activity at GLP-1R (unknown origin) expressed in candidate selection CHO cells assessed as cAMP accumulation incubated for 30 mins by plate reader method2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-23, Volume: 65, Issue:12
A Small-Molecule Oral Agonist of the Human Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor.
AID1392278Antidiabetic activity in Sprague-Dawley rat assessed as blood glucose level at 25 nmol/kg, ip treated 30 mins prior to glucose challenge measured at 15 mins interval for 180 mins by OGTT (Rvb = 13.8 +/- 1.31 nmol/L)2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 05-15, Volume: 26, Issue:9
Novel fatty acid chain modified GLP-1 derivatives with prolonged in vivo glucose-lowering ability and balanced glucoregulatory activity.
AID1911939Displacement of [125I]GLP-1 from FAP-tagged human GLP-1R expressed in CHO cells assessed as inhibition constant by radioligand binding assay2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-23, Volume: 65, Issue:12
A Small-Molecule Oral Agonist of the Human Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor.
AID1911921Agonist activity at FAP-tagged human GLP-1R expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as receptor internalization2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-23, Volume: 65, Issue:12
A Small-Molecule Oral Agonist of the Human Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor.
AID1066031Cmax in Sprague-Dawley rat at 15 nmol/kg, sc by LC-MS/MS analysis2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-27, Volume: 56, Issue:24
Design, synthesis, and biological activity of novel dicoumarol glucagon-like peptide 1 conjugates.
AID1483063Agonist activity at mouse glucagon receptor expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as cAMP accumulation after 30 mins by HTRF assay2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-25, Volume: 60, Issue:10
Design of Novel Exendin-Based Dual Glucagon-like Peptide 1 (GLP-1)/Glucagon Receptor Agonists.
AID1066026Hypoglycemic activity in C57BL/6J-m+/+Leprdb (db/db) mouse assessed as reduction of plasma glucose level at 25 nmol/kg, ip administered 0.5 hrs prior to glucose challenge measured after 6 to 9 hrs by IPGTT2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-27, Volume: 56, Issue:24
Design, synthesis, and biological activity of novel dicoumarol glucagon-like peptide 1 conjugates.
AID1483062Agonist activity at mouse GLP-1 receptor expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as cAMP accumulation after 30 mins by HTRF assay2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-25, Volume: 60, Issue:10
Design of Novel Exendin-Based Dual Glucagon-like Peptide 1 (GLP-1)/Glucagon Receptor Agonists.
AID475818Cmax in cannulated Sprague-Dawley rat at 10 nmol, sc after 4 hrs by EIA2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-12, Volume: 52, Issue:21
Preparation and structural, biochemical, and pharmaceutical characterizations of bile acid-modified long-acting exendin-4 derivatives.
AID1392298Antidiabetic activity in STZ/diet-induced obese C57BL/6 mouse assessed as reduction in body weight gain at 25 nmol/kg, ip administered daily for 4 weeks measured daily during compound dosing2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 05-15, Volume: 26, Issue:9
Novel fatty acid chain modified GLP-1 derivatives with prolonged in vivo glucose-lowering ability and balanced glucoregulatory activity.
AID1483066Terminal half life in IGT patient at 10 ug, sc twice daily2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-25, Volume: 60, Issue:10
Design of Novel Exendin-Based Dual Glucagon-like Peptide 1 (GLP-1)/Glucagon Receptor Agonists.
AID1465193Agonist activity at GLP1 receptor in mouse BetaTC6 cells assessed as increase in glucose-dependent insulin secretion at 10'-12 to 10'-5 M after 120 mins by sandwich ELISA2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 11-15, Volume: 27, Issue:22
Synthesis and in vitro biological evaluation of new pyrimidines as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists.
AID1601247Antidiabetic activity against STZ-induced diabetic Kunming mouse assessed as reduction in cumulative food intake at 25 nmol/kg, ip qd administered for 3 weeks and measured every day2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-15, Volume: 27, Issue:20
Novel lipid side chain modified exenatide analogs emerged prolonged glucoregulatory activity and potential body weight management properties.
AID1365156Anorectic activity in overnight fasted Y2R-/- C57BL/6J mouse assessed as inhibition of food intake at 10 nmol/kg, sc followed by re-feeding post dose and measured for 2 hrs2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-15, Volume: 25, Issue:20
Highly potent antiobesity effect of a short-length peptide YY analog in mice.
AID1874892Agonist activity at human GLP-1R expressed in CHO cells coexpressing beta-arrestin-2 assessed as increase in beta arrestin-2 recruitment incubated for 1 hr by chemiluminescence based pathHunter assay2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-08, Volume: 65, Issue:17
Modifying a Hydroxyl Patch in Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Produces Biased Agonists with Unique Signaling Profiles.
AID758128Antidiabetic activity in type 2 diabetes patient assessed as reduction of HbA1c at 2 mg, sc relative to control2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-15, Volume: 23, Issue:14
Recent progress and future options in the development of GLP-1 receptor agonists for the treatment of diabesity.
AID1662686Agonist activity at human GPR146 expressed in CHO-K1 cells assessed as induction of dynamic mass redistribution response at 5 uM by DMR assay2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 07-01, Volume: 30, Issue:13
Is GPR146 really the receptor for proinsulin C-peptide?
AID1874895Agonist activity at human GLP-1R expressed in CHO cells coexpressing beta-arrestin-2 assessed as stimulation intracellular calcium mobilization by measuring maximum efficacy measured after 180 secs by Fluo-3-AM dye based fluorescence assay relative to GLP2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-08, Volume: 65, Issue:17
Modifying a Hydroxyl Patch in Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Produces Biased Agonists with Unique Signaling Profiles.
AID1639334Cytoprotective activity against glucolipotoxicity-mediated cell death in rat INS-1 cells assessed as reduction in apoptotic cells at 10 uM after 24 hrs by Annexin V/propidium iodide staining-based flow cytometric analysis2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 04-15, Volume: 27, Issue:8
Novel nonapeptide GLP (28-36) amide derivatives with improved hypoglycemic and body weight lowering effects.
AID1483055Agonist activity at human glucagon receptor expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as cAMP accumulation after 30 mins by HTRF assay2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-25, Volume: 60, Issue:10
Design of Novel Exendin-Based Dual Glucagon-like Peptide 1 (GLP-1)/Glucagon Receptor Agonists.
AID1874889Agonist activity at human GLP-1R expressed in CHO cells coexpressing beta-arrestin-2 assessed as reduction in cAMP accumulation incubated for 2 hrs under dark condition by LANCE cAMP assay2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-08, Volume: 65, Issue:17
Modifying a Hydroxyl Patch in Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Produces Biased Agonists with Unique Signaling Profiles.
AID1365155Anorectic activity in overnight fasted C57BL/6J mouse assessed as inhibition of food intake at 10 nmol/kg, sc followed by re-feeding post dose and measured for 2 hrs2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-15, Volume: 25, Issue:20
Highly potent antiobesity effect of a short-length peptide YY analog in mice.
AID1662693Agonist activity at human GLP1R expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as recruitment of beta-arrestin by PathHunter assay2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 07-01, Volume: 30, Issue:13
Is GPR146 really the receptor for proinsulin C-peptide?
AID1639340Antiobesity activity in C57BL/6J mouse model of diet-induced obesity assessed as reduction in cumulative food intake at 25 nmol/kg, ip qd for 4 weeks relative to control2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 04-15, Volume: 27, Issue:8
Novel nonapeptide GLP (28-36) amide derivatives with improved hypoglycemic and body weight lowering effects.
AID1066033Antidiabetic activity in Sprague-Dawley rat assessed as reduction of plasma glucose level at 25 nmol/kg, ip administered 0.5 hrs prior to glucose challenge measured at 15 to 60 mins by OGTT2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-27, Volume: 56, Issue:24
Design, synthesis, and biological activity of novel dicoumarol glucagon-like peptide 1 conjugates.
AID1066032Tmax in Sprague-Dawley rat at 15 nmol/kg, sc by LC-MS/MS analysis2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-27, Volume: 56, Issue:24
Design, synthesis, and biological activity of novel dicoumarol glucagon-like peptide 1 conjugates.
AID1708343Agonist activity at rat glucagon receptor expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as stimulation of cAMP accumulation by FRET assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 01-28, Volume: 64, Issue:2
Design and Evaluation of Peptide Dual-Agonists of GLP-1 and NPY2 Receptors for Glucoregulation and Weight Loss with Mitigated Nausea and Emesis.
AID1601254Antidiabetic activity against STZ-induced diabetic Kunming mouse assessed as increase in insulin positive cells at 25 nmol/kg,ip qd administered for 3 weeks and measured after 24 days by immunohistochemical analysis2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-15, Volume: 27, Issue:20
Novel lipid side chain modified exenatide analogs emerged prolonged glucoregulatory activity and potential body weight management properties.
AID1066036Antidiabetic activity in Sprague-Dawley rat assessed as reduction of plasma glucose level at 25 nmol/kg, ip administered 0.5 hrs prior to glucose challenge by OGTT (Rvb = 13.32 +/- 1.84 mM)2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-27, Volume: 56, Issue:24
Design, synthesis, and biological activity of novel dicoumarol glucagon-like peptide 1 conjugates.
AID1911938Agonist activity at FAP-tagged human GLP-1R expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as receptor internalization by measuring maximal efficacy relative to control2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-23, Volume: 65, Issue:12
A Small-Molecule Oral Agonist of the Human Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor.
AID475815Antidiabetic activity in overnight fasted db/db mouse assessed as blood glucose level at 10 nmol/kg, sc administered 30 mins prior to glucose challenge measured after 120 mins by IPGTT (Rvb = 13.14 +/- 0.90 nM)2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-12, Volume: 52, Issue:21
Preparation and structural, biochemical, and pharmaceutical characterizations of bile acid-modified long-acting exendin-4 derivatives.
AID1601257Antidiabetic activity in STZ-induced diabetic Kunming mouse assessed as hypoglycemic time duration for glycemia under 8.35 mmol/L at 25 nmol/kg, ip pretreated with STZ for 5 consecutive days and measured up to 48 hrs2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-15, Volume: 27, Issue:20
Novel lipid side chain modified exenatide analogs emerged prolonged glucoregulatory activity and potential body weight management properties.
AID1392280Antidiabetic activity in Sprague-Dawley rat assessed as time required to increase in plasma insulin level at 25 nmol/kg, ip treated 30 mins prior to glucose challenge by ELISA2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 05-15, Volume: 26, Issue:9
Novel fatty acid chain modified GLP-1 derivatives with prolonged in vivo glucose-lowering ability and balanced glucoregulatory activity.
AID1066039Activation of human GLP-1 receptor overexpressed in HEK293 cells assessed as cAMP accumulation after 20 mins by HTRF assay2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-27, Volume: 56, Issue:24
Design, synthesis, and biological activity of novel dicoumarol glucagon-like peptide 1 conjugates.
AID758127Antidiabetic activity in type 2 diabetes patient assessed as reduction in body weight at 2 mg, sc2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-15, Volume: 23, Issue:14
Recent progress and future options in the development of GLP-1 receptor agonists for the treatment of diabesity.
AID1874894Agonist activity at human GLP-1R expressed in CHO cells coexpressing beta-arrestin-2 assessed as reduction in cAMP accumulation by measuring maximum efficacy incubated for 2 hrs under dark condition by LANCE cAMP assay relative to GLP12022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-08, Volume: 65, Issue:17
Modifying a Hydroxyl Patch in Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Produces Biased Agonists with Unique Signaling Profiles.
AID1874888Binding affinity to human GLP-1R expressed in CHO cells coexpressing beta-arrestin-2 incubated for 1 hr by time-resolved fluorescence assay2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-08, Volume: 65, Issue:17
Modifying a Hydroxyl Patch in Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Produces Biased Agonists with Unique Signaling Profiles.
AID294990Insulinotropic activity in RIN5F cells assessed as stimulation of glucose-dependent insulin secretion per ug of protein at 0.1 uM2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 15, Issue:9
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of substituted-N-(thieno[2,3-b]pyridin-3-yl)-guanidines, N-(1H-pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridin-3-yl)-guanidines, and N-(1H-indol-3-yl)-guanidines.
AID1708340Agonist activity at human GLP-1R expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as stimulation of cAMP accumulation by FRET assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 01-28, Volume: 64, Issue:2
Design and Evaluation of Peptide Dual-Agonists of GLP-1 and NPY2 Receptors for Glucoregulation and Weight Loss with Mitigated Nausea and Emesis.
AID1066018Hypoglycemic activity in C57BL/6J-m+/+Leprdb (db/db) mouse assessed as time required to reduce plasma glucose level below 8.35 mM at 25 nmol/kg, ip administered for 0.5 hrs2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-27, Volume: 56, Issue:24
Design, synthesis, and biological activity of novel dicoumarol glucagon-like peptide 1 conjugates.
AID1474167Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring verified drug-induced liver injury concern status2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID1392279Antidiabetic activity in Sprague-Dawley rat assessed as reduction in blood glucose AUC at 25 nmol/kg, ip treated 30 mins prior to glucose challenge measured at 15 mins interval for 180 mins by OGTT2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 05-15, Volume: 26, Issue:9
Novel fatty acid chain modified GLP-1 derivatives with prolonged in vivo glucose-lowering ability and balanced glucoregulatory activity.
AID1708361Toxicity in musk shrew assessed as induction of emesis at 10 to 60 nmol/kg, ip measured after 120 mins2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 01-28, Volume: 64, Issue:2
Design and Evaluation of Peptide Dual-Agonists of GLP-1 and NPY2 Receptors for Glucoregulation and Weight Loss with Mitigated Nausea and Emesis.
AID1601244Antidiabetic activity in Sprague-Dawley rat assessed as increase in insulin level at 25 nmol/kg, ip pretreated for 30 mins followed by glucose challenge and measured after 15 to 60 mins by ELISA method2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-15, Volume: 27, Issue:20
Novel lipid side chain modified exenatide analogs emerged prolonged glucoregulatory activity and potential body weight management properties.
AID475816Antidiabetic activity in overnight fasted db/db mouse assessed as decrease in glucose AUC at 10 nmol/kg, sc administered 30 mins prior to glucose challenge measured after 120 mins by IPGTT2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-12, Volume: 52, Issue:21
Preparation and structural, biochemical, and pharmaceutical characterizations of bile acid-modified long-acting exendin-4 derivatives.
AID1639353Antiobesity activity in C57BL/6J mouse model of diet-induced obesity assessed as reduction in circulating adiponectin level at 25 nmol/kg, ip qd for 4 weeks2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 04-15, Volume: 27, Issue:8
Novel nonapeptide GLP (28-36) amide derivatives with improved hypoglycemic and body weight lowering effects.
AID1874896Agonist activity at human GLP-1R assessed as increase in ERK1/2 phosphorylation by measuring maximum efficacy at Thr202/Tyr204 residues incubated for 20 mins by AlphaLISA assay relative to GLP12022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-08, Volume: 65, Issue:17
Modifying a Hydroxyl Patch in Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Produces Biased Agonists with Unique Signaling Profiles.
AID1662687Agonist activity at human GLP1R expressed in CHO-K1 cells assessed as induction of dynamic mass redistribution response at 5 uM by DMR assay2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 07-01, Volume: 30, Issue:13
Is GPR146 really the receptor for proinsulin C-peptide?
AID1708358Suppression of blood glucose level in prediabetic Sprague-Dawley rat model of DIO assessed as reduction in post-dextrose bolus blood glucose at 10 nmol/kg dosed daily for 5 days by IPGTT method2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 01-28, Volume: 64, Issue:2
Design and Evaluation of Peptide Dual-Agonists of GLP-1 and NPY2 Receptors for Glucoregulation and Weight Loss with Mitigated Nausea and Emesis.
AID1068432Inhibition of H202-induced apoptosis in mouse MIN6 cells assessed as change in nuclear fragmentation at 10 nM preincubated for 24 hrs followed by H202 challenge measured after 1 hr by Hoechst 33342 staining-based microscopic analysis2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-12, Volume: 73Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel peptide MC62 analogues as potential antihyperglycemic agents.
AID1498065Agonist activity at human GLP1R expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as cAMP accumulation after 30 mins by HTRF assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-12, Volume: 61, Issue:13
Dual Glucagon-like Peptide 1 (GLP-1)/Glucagon Receptor Agonists Specifically Optimized for Multidose Formulations.
AID475823Mean residence time in cannulated Sprague-Dawley rat at 10 nmol, sc after 4 hrs by EIA2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-12, Volume: 52, Issue:21
Preparation and structural, biochemical, and pharmaceutical characterizations of bile acid-modified long-acting exendin-4 derivatives.
AID1708351Intrinsic clearance in Sprague-Dawley rat liver microsomes at 30 uM in presence of NADPH by HPLC analysis2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 01-28, Volume: 64, Issue:2
Design and Evaluation of Peptide Dual-Agonists of GLP-1 and NPY2 Receptors for Glucoregulation and Weight Loss with Mitigated Nausea and Emesis.
AID1639335Antidiabetic activity in STZ-induced diabetic ICR mouse model assessed as fasting blood glucose level at 25 nmol/kg, ip for 5 consecutive days by glucometery (Rvb = 17.7 +/- 1.1 mM)2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 04-15, Volume: 27, Issue:8
Novel nonapeptide GLP (28-36) amide derivatives with improved hypoglycemic and body weight lowering effects.
AID1066037Binding affinity to human serum albumin at 100 ug/mL after 3 hrs relative to control2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-27, Volume: 56, Issue:24
Design, synthesis, and biological activity of novel dicoumarol glucagon-like peptide 1 conjugates.
AID1911934Agonist activity at human GLP-1R expressed in PathHunter CHO-K1 GLP1R beta-arrestin-1 cell assessed as induction of beta-arrestin 1 recruitment incubated for 90 mins by pathHunter assay2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-23, Volume: 65, Issue:12
A Small-Molecule Oral Agonist of the Human Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor.
AID1708342Agonist activity at human NPY1R expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as inhibition of adenosine-induced stimulation of cAMP accumulation by FRET assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 01-28, Volume: 64, Issue:2
Design and Evaluation of Peptide Dual-Agonists of GLP-1 and NPY2 Receptors for Glucoregulation and Weight Loss with Mitigated Nausea and Emesis.
AID1068433Antioxidant activity in STZ-induced mouse model assessed as GSH level at 1 umol/kg, ip administered for 20 days measured on day 21 (Rvb = 8.13 +/- 0.13 mg/ml)2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-12, Volume: 73Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel peptide MC62 analogues as potential antihyperglycemic agents.
AID1498067Agonist activity at human GIP receptor expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as cAMP accumulation after 30 mins by HTRF assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-12, Volume: 61, Issue:13
Dual Glucagon-like Peptide 1 (GLP-1)/Glucagon Receptor Agonists Specifically Optimized for Multidose Formulations.
AID1068434Antioxidant activity in STZ-induced mouse model assessed as GSH-PX level at 1 umol/kg, ip administered for 20 days measured on day 21 (Rvb = 1449.23 +/- 49.42 U/ml)2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-12, Volume: 73Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel peptide MC62 analogues as potential antihyperglycemic agents.
AID1911923Agonist activity at GLP-1R (unknown origin) expressed in candidate selection CHO cells assessed as cAMP accumulation by measuring maximal efficacy at 20 uM incubated for 30 mins by plate reader method relative to control2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-23, Volume: 65, Issue:12
A Small-Molecule Oral Agonist of the Human Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor.
AID1392294Antidiabetic activity in STZ-induced diabetic Kunming mouse model assessed as increase in islet beta-cell area 25 nmol/kg, ip administered once daily for 3 weeks measured post last dose by hematoxylin and eosin staining based assay2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 05-15, Volume: 26, Issue:9
Novel fatty acid chain modified GLP-1 derivatives with prolonged in vivo glucose-lowering ability and balanced glucoregulatory activity.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (2,738)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's30 (1.10)18.2507
2000's534 (19.50)29.6817
2010's1748 (63.84)24.3611
2020's426 (15.56)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials383 (13.65%)5.53%
Trials0 (0.00%)5.53%
Reviews402 (14.33%)6.00%
Reviews3 (13.64%)6.00%
Case Studies72 (2.57%)4.05%
Case Studies0 (0.00%)4.05%
Observational22 (0.78%)0.25%
Observational0 (0.00%)0.25%
Other1,927 (68.67%)84.16%
Other19 (86.36%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (318)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
iPAVE - Imaging Pituitary ActiVation by Exendin [NCT03923114]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-05-23Recruiting
The Physiology of Glucagon-like-peptide-1 Espression in Patients With Endogenous Hyperinsulinism: Correlation With Histopathology [NCT03768518]40 participants (Anticipated)Observational2018-02-07Recruiting
Impact of Exenatide on Cardiovascular Exercise Performance in Type 2 Diabetes [NCT01364584]23 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Completed
The Effect of GLP-1 Receptor Activation on Central Reward and Satiety Circuits in Response to Food Stimuli in Obesity and Diabetes [NCT01281228]48 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
Effects of Exenatide (Byetta®) on Biochemical and Histological Parameters of Liver Function in Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) [NCT01208649]Phase 413 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
Intravenous Exenatide (Byetta) for the Treatment of Perioperative Hyperglycemia: Rollover Phase I/II Trial [NCT00882050]Phase 1/Phase 2104 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
A Dose Block-randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Dose-escalating, Phase I Study to Evaluate Safety and Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of DA-3091 After Subcutaneous Injection in Healthy Male Subjects [NCT01156779]Phase 131 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
A Pilot Study Evaluating Exenatide for the Treatment of Postprandial Hyperinsulinemic Hypoglycemia Post-RYGB [NCT02685852]Phase 111 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-29Completed
Incretin-based Drugs and the Risk of Heart Failure: A Multi-center Network Observational Study [NCT02456428]1,499,650 participants (Actual)Observational2014-03-31Completed
Visualizing Beta Cells in Patients With a History of Gestational Diabetes [NCT03182296]24 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-11-10Recruiting
Exenatide Weekly Injections as an Adjunctive Treatment in Patients With Schizophrenia [NCT02417142]Phase 470 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
Evaluation of the Single-Use Pre-Filled Autoinjector [NCT02349802]Phase 13,052 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Completed
Enhancing Weight Loss Maintenance With GLP-1RA (BYDUREON™) in Adolescents With Severe Obesity [NCT02496611]Phase 2100 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
A Phase 1, Open-label, Randomized, Two-period, Two-treatment, Crossover Study to Evaluate the Effect of Exenatide on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Bexagliflozin in Healthy Subjects [NCT03167411]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-24Completed
A Phase 1b, Exploratory, Randomized, Partially Single Blinded, Placebo and Open Label Controlled, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Effects of HM11260C and an Active Comparator on Gastric Emptying and Beta-Cell Response in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes M [NCT02059564]Phase 144 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-12-31Recruiting
Effects of GLP-1 Receptor Agonist on Fat Redistribution and Inflammatory Status in Female Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity [NCT02118376]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-08-31Not yet recruiting
A Phase 3b, Randomized, Active Comparator, Open-label, Multicenter Study to Compare the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of ITCA 650 to Empagliflozin and to Glimepiride as Add-on Therapy to Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT03060980]Phase 3245 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-03Terminated(stopped due to Decision by Sponsor)
Randomized Trial Investigating Exenatide for Diabetes Prevention in Obese, Insulin-Resistant Individuals With Prediabetes [NCT02084654]Phase 166 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Bioenergetic Alterations After Exenatide Administration [NCT00623545]Phase 428 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
An Open Label, Single Site, 12 Month, Phase II, Randomised Controlled Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Exendin-4 (Exenatide) in the Treatment of Patients With Moderate Severity Parkinson's Disease. [NCT01174810]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-07-31Active, not recruiting
An Evaluation of the Metabolic Effects of Exenatide, Rosiglitazone, and Exenatide Plus Rosiglitazone in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Metformin [NCT00135330]Phase 3137 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Open Label, Comparator-Controlled, Parallel Group, Multicenter Study to Compare the Effects of Exenatide and Insulin Glargine on Beta Cell Function and Cardiovascular Risk Markers in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Metfor [NCT00097500]Phase 369 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
Efficacy of Exenatide (AC2993, Synthetic Exendin-4, LY2148568) Compared With Twice-Daily Biphasic Insulin Aspart in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Using Sulfonylurea and Metformin [NCT00082407]Phase 3505 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-11-30Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Exenatide Once Weekly Versus Liraglutide in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes and Inadequate Glycemic Control Treated With Lifestyle Modification and Oral Antidiabetic Medications [NCT01029886]Phase 3912 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Effect of Additional Treatment With EXenatide in Patients With an Acute Myocardial Infarction (the EXAMI Trial) [NCT01254123]Phase 340 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-11-30Recruiting
The Use of Incretin-based Drugs and the Risk of Acute Pancreatitis in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT02476760]1,417,914 participants (Actual)Observational2014-03-31Completed
A Comparison of Exenatide and Insulin Glargine on Glycemic Variability in T2DM Patients Inadequately Controlled With Metformin Monotherapy [NCT02325960]Phase 444 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
Does Glucagon-like Peptide (GLP-1) Receptor Agonist Stimulation Reduce Alcohol Intake in Patients With Alcohol Dependence? [NCT03232112]Phase 2152 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-07Completed
COMBinAtion Therapy in Myocardial Infarction: The COMBAT-MI Trial [NCT02404376]Phase 3378 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
The Effects of Faecal Microbiota Transplantation on Beta Cell Preservation in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes [NCT05622123]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-23Recruiting
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Comparison of the Effects of Two Doses of LY2189265 or Exenatide on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Stable Doses of Metformin and Pioglitazone (AWARD-1: Assessment of Weekly Administration of LY2189265 [NCT01064687]Phase 3978 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
Effects of Exenatide on Postprandial Hyperlipidemia and Inflammation [NCT00974272]Phase 439 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
Effects of GLP-1 RAs on Weight and Metabolic Indicators in Obese Patients [NCT03671733]Phase 3150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-09-01Recruiting
The Efficacy of Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide in Controlling Glycaemia in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on GLP-1 Receptor Agonist and OAD Therapy (DUAL™ III -GLP-1 Switch) [NCT01676116]Phase 3438 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-29Completed
Effects of Exenatide on Hypothalamic Obesity [NCT01061775]Phase 1/Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
EBIRIOS - Exenatide and Basal Insulins Use in the Real Setting: an Italian Observational Study in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Secondary Failure of Oral Antihyperglycemic Treatment [NCT01060059]888 participants (Actual)Observational2010-04-30Completed
A Pilot Study on the Effect of Glucagon and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Co-agonism on Cardiac Function and Metabolism in Overweight Participants With Type 2 Diabetes (COCONUT) [NCT04307797]Phase 416 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-18Recruiting
Effect of Bydureon on Carotid Atherosclerosis Progression in T2DM [NCT02162550]Phase 4148 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-06-30Active, not recruiting
A 28-week, Multi-center Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Potential of Dapagliflozin Plus Exenatide in Combination With High-dose Intensive Insulin Therapy Compared to Placebo in Obese Insulin-resistant Patients With Type [NCT03419624]Phase 313 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-19Terminated(stopped due to Delay in patient enrolment)
Post-Marketing Surveillance Study: 12 To 24 Weeks Study On The Treatment Emergent Adverse Events In Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Taking Exenatide In Korea [NCT02090673]1,711 participants (Actual)Observational2009-02-28Completed
Effect of Short-term Intensive Insulin Sequential Exenatide Therapy on Beta Cell Function and Glycaemic Control in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes :a Multicenter Prospective Randomized Control Study [NCT02129985]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-02-28Recruiting
Exenatide BID Compared With Insulin Glargine to Change Liver Fat Content in Non-alcoholic Fatty-liver Disease Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT02303730]Phase 476 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-31Completed
[NCT02170324]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
Effect of AC 2993 (Synthetic Exendin-4) - Administered Alone or in Combination With Daclizumab - on Islet Function in Patients With Type I Diabetes [NCT00064714]Phase 247 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-07-31Completed
SGLT2 INHIBITION AND STIMULATION OF ENDOGENOUS GLUCOSE PRODUCTION [EGP]: Can the Glucagon-like Peptide-1 [GLP-1] Receptor Agonist, Exenatide, Prevent the Increase in EGP in Response to Dapagliflozin-induced Increase in Glucosuria [NCT03331289]Phase 4107 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-28Completed
A 24-week, Single Centre, Randomized, Parallel-group, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Phase II Study With an Optional 28-week Open-label Extension to Evaluate the Efficacy on Body Weight of Dapagliflozin 10 mg Once Daily in Combination With Exenatide 2 m [NCT02313220]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
EXEnatide in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Improved glUcose conTrol and hemodynamIc ValuEs [NCT01373216]Phase 338 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
Effects of EXEnatide on Glycemic Control and Weight Over 26 Weeks in Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (CSII) Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes : a Phase 2/3 Double Blind randoMized Placebo-controlled Trial. [NCT01140893]Phase 2/Phase 3110 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-11-30Recruiting
Effect of the Weekly Administration of Exenatide LAR or Dulaglutide on the Variability of Blood Pressure and Heart Rate of 24 Hours in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Without Pharmacological Treatment. [NCT03444142]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-11-17Recruiting
A Phase 2, Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label, Controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Exenatide SR for the Prevention of Diabetes After Kidney Transplantation. [NCT03961256]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-09Completed
Comparison Between GLP 1 Analogues and DPP 4 Inhibitors in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT01235819]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
Pharmacogenomics of GLP1 Receptor Agonists [NCT05762744]Phase 178 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-01Terminated(stopped due to We concluded that it would not be possible to meet our recruitment targets within the available budget. The study was ended when the funding ended.)
The Effect of Exenatide on Insulin Requirement, Weight and Inflammation in Obese Type 2 Diabetic Subjects on Insulin [NCT01154933]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
Research of Intensive Metabolic Intervention Before Pregnancy in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome [NCT03383068]Phase 4160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-01-01Not yet recruiting
Effect of Chronic Exenatide Therapy on Beta Cell Function and Insulin Sensitivity in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) [NCT02981069]Phase 490 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-15Completed
The Effect of Exenatide on Fasting Bile Acids in Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients, a Pilot Study [NCT04303819]38 participants (Actual)Observational2020-01-05Completed
A Randomized, Phase 1, Three-Period, Placebo- and Positive-Controlled, Double-Blind, Crossover Study to Assess the Electrophysiological Effects of Exenatide at Therapeutic and Supratherapeutic Concentrations on the 12-Lead Electrocardiogram QT Interval in [NCT01297062]Phase 194 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
Efficacy of Once-Weekly Exenatide Versus Once or Twice Daily Insulin Detemir in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Metformin Alone or in Combination With Sulphonylurea [NCT01003184]Phase 3222 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
Effect of Exenatide on 24h-UAER in Patients With Diabetic Nephropathy: a 24- Week Study [NCT02690883]Phase 492 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-08Completed
A Pilot Study to Determine the Effects of a Single Dose of Exenatide (Byetta ®) on the Acute Metabolic Responses to a Mixed Meal or Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes [NCT01855490]Phase 117 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
A New Treatment Strategy of Adding Exenatide to Insulin Therapy for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) [NCT01006889]Phase 424 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
The Effect of GLP-1 on Postprandial Glucagon Secretion During Prolonged and Intermittent Stimulation of the GLP-1 Receptor Independent of The Gastric Emptying Rate. A Randomized, Open-label Study in People With Type 1 Diabetes [NCT02584582]Phase 2/Phase 310 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-07-31Enrolling by invitation
The Effect of Glucagon-like Peptide 1 (GLP-1) Receptor Agonist on Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity in Stroke Patients [NCT02829502]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-08-31Recruiting
A Placebo- and Positive-Controlled Study of the Electrophysiological Effects of a Single 10 μg Dose of Exenatide on the 12-Lead Electrocardiogram QT Interval in Healthy Subjects [NCT00672399]Phase 170 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Exenatide as Monotherapy and Adjunctive Therapy to Oral Antidiabetic Agents in Adolescents With Type 2 Diabetes. [NCT00658021]Phase 3122 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-30Completed
An Open-Label Study Examining the Long-Term Safety of Exenatide Given Twice Daily to Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT01876849]Phase 3275 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-31Completed
Randomized, Active Controlled, Open Label Study to Compare Taspoglutide vs Exenatide as add-on Treatment to Metformin and/or Thiazolidinediones in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00717457]Phase 31,189 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Agonist Effects on Energy Balance in Hypothalamic Obesity [NCT02664441]Phase 342 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
Effect of Exenatide Once Weekly on Cardiovascular Risk Markers in Patients With Type-2 Diabetes [NCT02380521]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
Research of Exenatide for Management of Reproductive and Metabolic Dysfunction in Overweight/Obese PCOS Patients With Impaired Glucose Regulation [NCT03352869]Phase 4183 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-28Completed
[NCT02092597]Phase 442 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University [NCT03297879]Phase 4230 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-01Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label, Long-Term, Parallel-Group, Comparator-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Compare the Glycemic Effects, Safety, and Tolerability of Exenatide Once Weekly Suspension to Exenatide Twice Daily in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT01652716]Phase 3377 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
New Imaging Procedure for the Localisation of Insulinoma [NCT02127541]52 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-06Completed
The Differential Effects of Diabetes Therapy on Inflammation [NCT02150707]17 participants (Actual)Observational2014-05-31Completed
A Phase 1b, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Comparator (Open-Label Exenatide) Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of Roflumilast Plus Alogliptin on Postprandial Active GLP-1 Level and 24-hour Glucose Level in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Who Are Ina [NCT01664624]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
Effect of Exenatide on Disease Progression in Early Parkinson's Disease [NCT04305002]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-21Active, not recruiting
Effect of Gelofusine on 111In-DTPA-AHX-Lys40-Exendin 4 Uptake in the Kidney [NCT02541734]Phase 1/Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-31Completed
6-Months Exenatide and Glucose Homeostasis Determinants in Type 2 Diabetic Patients [NCT00948168]Phase 434 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
A 16-Week, Parallel-Group, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Dose-Ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Multiple Doses and Multiple Treatment Regimens of GSK716155, With Byetta as an Open Label Active [NCT00518115]Phase 2361 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
Efficacy of a Glucagon-like-peptide-1 Agonist and Restrictive vs. Liberal Oxygen Supply in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting or Aortic Valve Replacement - a 2-by-2 Factorial Designed, Randomized Clinical Study [NCT02673931]1,400 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-29Active, not recruiting
A Pilot, Safety and Feasibility Trial of Anti-Thymocyte Globulin (ATG), Low Dose Interleukin-2 (IL-2), Adalimumab and Exenatide in the Treatment of New-Onset Type 1 Diabetes [NCT02586831]Phase 1/Phase 245 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-06-01Not yet recruiting
Effect of AC2993 (Synthetic Exendin-4) Compared With Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Also Using Combination Therapy With Sulfonylurea and Metformin [NCT00082381]Phase 3551 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
A Dose Block-randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Dose-escalating Study to Evaluate Safety and Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of SR Exenatide (PT302) After Subcutaneous Injection in Healthy Male Volunteers [NCT00964262]Phase 134 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
Effect of Pioglitazone With and Without Exenatide on Body Weight, Fat Topography, Beta Cell Function, and Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetic Patients [NCT00845182]Phase 443 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
The Effect of the Glucagon Suppressors Pramlintide and Exenatide on Postprandial Glucose Metabolism in Children With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00950677]Phase 416 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
A Comparator-Controlled Study to Examine the Effects of Exenatide Once-Weekly Injection on Glucose Control (HbA1c) and Safety in Asian Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Managed With Oral Antidiabetic Medications [NCT00917267]Phase 3691 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
Do Appetitive Gut Hormones Reduce Addictive and Eating Behaviours in Obesity, and Nicotine and Alcohol Dependence? [NCT02690987]Early Phase 195 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-31Active, not recruiting
Two-Part, Randomized, Placebo and Active-Controlled, Double-Blind, Thorough QT Study Evaluating the Effects of Intravenous Exenatide on Cardiac Repolarization in Healthy Male and Female Volunteers [NCT02650479]Phase 182 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-31Completed
A Phase 1, Fixed-Sequence, Open-label Study in Healthy Subjects to Estimate the Effects of ITCA 650 on Gastric Emptying and on the Absorption Pharmacokinetics of Each of 4 Commonly Studied Drug/Drug Interaction (DDI) Probe Compounds [NCT02641899]Phase 133 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
Multiple-Dose Study to Examine Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of LY2148568 Long-Acting Release in Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00612794]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
A Cohort Study of the Benefits of Bydureon in Customary Clinical Care in the United States - Additional Analyses [NCT02917057]6,024 participants (Actual)Observational2015-08-01Completed
Clinical Evaluation of 68Ga-NOTA-MAL-Cys39-exendin-4 Positron Emission Tomography in the Detection of Insulinoma [NCT04185350]Early Phase 160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-05-05Recruiting
Acute Effect of a GLP-1-Analogue (Exenatide) and of a DPP-4-Inhibitor (Sitagliptin) in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Insulin Glargine Once Daily [NCT00971659]Phase 148 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Comparator-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Glycemic Effects, Safety, and Tolerability of Exenatide Once Weekly in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00877890]Phase 3254 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
An Open Label Study Comparing Exenatide With Basal Insulin in Achieving an HbA1c of ≤ 7.4% With Minimum Weight Gain, in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Who Are Not Achieving Adequate HbA1c Control on Oral Anti Diabetic Therapies Alone [NCT00360334]Phase 3235 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
An Exploratory Study of the Effect of Treatment Interruption on Safety of Exenatide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00516048]Phase 358 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
Effect of Liraglutide or Exenatide Added to a Background Treatment of Metformin, Sulphonylurea or a Combination of Both on Glycaemic Control in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00518882]Phase 3467 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
A Study to Assess the Effect of Exenatide Treatment on Mean 24-Hour Heart Rate in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00516074]Phase 354 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
The Physiology of Glucagon-like-peptide-1 Receptor Expression in Patients With Endogenous Hyperinsulinism - Correlation With Histopathology [NCT00937079]30 participants (Actual)Observational2007-11-30Completed
A Pilot Study of Effects of Exenatide on Body Weight in Non-Diabetic, Obese Patients [NCT00500370]Phase 2163 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
Investigation of the Cardiovascular Effects of Exenatide in Healthy Male Subjects [NCT01046721]8 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
The Role of Exenatide in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00456300]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
[NCT01302327]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Very rare disease, we were unable to recruit patients)
Exenatide (Byetta ®) Regulation of Intestinal and Hepatic Lipoprotein Particle Production in Humans. [NCT01056549]15 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
A Randomized Clinical Trial to Study Glucose Dependent Insulin Secretion Methodologies in Healthy Lean Male Subjects [NCT00782418]Phase 127 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Exenatide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Using a Thiazolidinedione or a Thiazolidinedione and Metformin [NCT00603239]Phase 3165 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
A Comparison of Adding Exenatide With Switching to Exenatide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Experiencing Inadequate Glycemic Control With Sitagliptin Plus Metformin [NCT00870194]Phase 4255 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
MB001-067 A PROSPECTIVE, DOUBLE BLIND, PLACEBO CONTROLLED, PARALLEL GROUP, RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF EXTENDED RELEASE EXENATIDE VERSUS PLACEBO (COHORT A) AND A PROSPECTIVE, SINGLE GROUP, OPEN-LABEL, BLINDED OUTCOME TRIAL OF EXTENDED RELEASE EXENATIDE (COHORT B) [NCT02251431]Phase 357 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-30Completed
Safety of Exenatide Once Weekly in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Thiazolidinedione Alone or Thiazolidinedione in Combination With Metformin [NCT00753896]Phase 3134 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Comparison of the Effect of Exenatide vs. Sitagliptin on 24-hour Average Glucose in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin or a Thiazolidinedione [NCT00729326]Phase 483 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
Efficacy of Once-Weekly Exenatide Long-Acting Release and Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Metformin Alone or in Combination With Sulfonylurea [NCT00641056]Phase 3467 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
Assessment of Pancreatic Beta Cell Mass and Function With the Aid of Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Human Diabetes Mellitus [NCT05662189]70 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-15Recruiting
The Effect of Exenatide Compared to Insulin Glargine on Cardiac Function and Metabolism in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Congestive Heart Failure: a Randomized Comparator-controlled Trial [NCT00766857]Phase 427 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of LY2148568 in Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Who Are Treated With Oral Antidiabetic(s) But Not Well Controlled [NCT00577824]Phase 3181 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Comparison of Type 2 Diabetes Pharmacotherapy Regimens Using Targeted Learning [NCT05073692]270,000 participants (Anticipated)Observational2021-07-01Recruiting
A Parallel, Double-blinded, Randomized, 6 Months, Two Arms Study With Lifestyle Intervention and Bydureon® or Lifestyle Intervention and Placebo in Adolescents With Obesity to Explore Differences With Regard to Change in BMI SDS [NCT02794402]Phase 244 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
Efficacy of Exenatide-LAR Alone and in Combination With Dapagliflozin in Overweight/Obese, Insulin Treated Patients With Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes [NCT02811484]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Inability to enroll due to the widespread use of both classes of drugs in patients with T2DM, including those on concomitant insulin therapy.)
Phase 2 Study of ITCA 650 in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00943917]Phase 2155 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
The Effects of Exenatide (Byetta) on Energy Expenditure and Weight Loss in Non-Diabetic Obese Subjects [NCT00856609]Phase 3150 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-03Completed
A Single-center,Proof of Concept,Randomized,Controlled Parallel Group Clinical Trial of the Effects of Exenatide vs. a Long Acting Insulin Analog to Evaluate the Efficacy of Exenatide in Patients With Diabetic Neuropathy and Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00855439]46 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
The Effects of Exenatide on Post-Prandial Glucose Excursions and Vascular Health in Obese/Pre-Diabetic Young Adults [NCT00845559]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Withdrawn
A Randomized, Multi-dose, Controlled Trial Investigating the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Exenatide Once Monthly Suspension. [NCT01104701]Phase 2121 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
A Phase 1, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study to Assess the Effect of ITCA 650 on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of a Combination Oral Contraceptive in Healthy Premenopausal Female Subjects [NCT02641990]Phase 128 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
Additional GLP-1 Analogue on CSII Treatment for Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetic Patients [NCT01473147]51 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Exenatide Once Weekly Injection Versus Metformin, Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor, or Thiazolidinedione as Monotherapy in Drug-Naive Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00676338]Phase 3820 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
Assessment of Hepatic Glucose and Fat Regulation in Overweight Adolescent Girls [NCT02157974]Phase 2/Phase 392 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Completed
A Pilot Study of the Effects of BYETTA® (Exenatide) on Weight Loss in Morbidly Obese Non Diabetic Patients Following Adjustable Gastric Banding [NCT00872378]Phase 2/Phase 328 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-02-28Recruiting
Prednisolone-induced Impairment of Glucose Metabolism and Beta-cell Dysfunction and the Protective Effects of Exenatide: a Single-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Crossover Study in Healthy Volunteers [NCT00744224]8 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
A Randomized Trial Comparing Exenatide With Placebo in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes on Insulin Glargine With or Without Oral Antihyperglycemic Medications [NCT00765817]Phase 3261 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
The Effect of the GLP-1 Analogue Exenatide on Glucose Metabolism in the CNS and Heart During Hyperglycemia in Type-2 Diabetic Patients Assessed by PET [NCT00747968]Phase 2/Phase 38 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
68Ga-NOTA-exendin-4 PET/CT for the Localization of Insulinoma and Diagnosis of Nesidioblastosis [NCT02560376]Early Phase 1100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-02-28Recruiting
A Randomised, Double Blind, Parallel Group, Placebo Controlled, Phase 3 Trial of Exenatide Once Weekly Over 2 Years as a Potential Disease Modifying Treatment for Parkinson's Disease [NCT04232969]Phase 3194 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-20Active, not recruiting
Effect of the GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Exenatide on Impaired Hypoglycaemic Awareness in Type 1 Diabetes [NCT02735031]Phase 2/Phase 310 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-21Completed
A Real-world, Observational Study of GLP-1 Therapy Added to Basal Insulin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT02895672]150 participants (Actual)Observational2016-08-31Completed
[NCT02584075]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-11-30Not yet recruiting
Contribution of a GLP-1 Agonist to Appetite Regulation, Metabolism and Body Composition in Subjects With Prader-Willi Syndrome. [NCT00551343]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
Pharmacological Postconditioning to Reduce Infarct Size Following Primary PCI in Patients With STEMI [NCT00835848]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
CHOICE: CHanges to Treatment and Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Initiating InjeCtablE Therapy - A European Observational Study of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Initiating Injectable Therapy to Determine Time to Treatment Change, Factors Associa [NCT00635492]2,515 participants (Actual)Observational2008-01-31Completed
A Phase 1, Open-Label Study to Evaluate Single and Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Exenatide Once-Weekly Suspension in Chinese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT04001231]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to The study is stopped based upon strategic considerations impacting the clinical development of exenatide once-weekly suspension in China)
A Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter, Comparator-Controlled Study to Examine the Effects of Exenatide Long-Acting Release on Glucose Control (HbA1c) and Safety in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Managed With Diet Modification and Exercise and/or O [NCT00308139]Phase 3303 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
Effect of Exenatide Plus Metformin vs. Premixed Human Insulin Aspart Plus Metformin on Glycemic Control and Hypoglycemia in Patients With Inadequate Control of Type 2 Diabetes on Oral Antidiabetic Treatment [NCT00434954]Phase 3494 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
Effect on Weight Loss of Exenatide Versus Placebo in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Participating in a Lifestyle Modification Program [NCT00375492]Phase 3196 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
The Effect of Detemir Compared to Exenatide and/or the Combination of Detemir and Exenatide on Glycemic Control and Weight in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Failed Oral Hypoglycemic Agents [NCT01076842]Phase 475 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
Long Term Treatment With Exenatide Versus Glimepiride in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Pretreated With Metformin (EUREXA: European Exenatide Study) [NCT00359762]Phase 31,029 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
Effectiveness of Once-weekly Exenatide (BCise) Plus Dapagliflozin on 24 Hour Glucose Variability Measured by CGM. A Proof of Concept. [NCT03970044]Phase 467 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-07-02Completed
Effects of KATP Channel Blockers on GLP-1 and Its Analogues' Mediated Microvascular Function [NCT01934816]2 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Technical Issues with intervention)
Exenatide for Myocardial Protection During Reperfusion Study: A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial [NCT01938235]Phase 2198 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-02-28Recruiting
An Open-Label Extension Study of Protocol 2993-112 to Examine the Long-Term Effect on Glucose Control (HbA1c) and Safety and Tolerability of AC2993 Given Two Times a Day to Subjects Treated With Metformin Alone [NCT01789957]Phase 3225 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-09-30Completed
Intravenous Exenatide (Byetta®) Versus Insulin for Perioperative Glycemic Control in Cardiac Surgery: the Open-labeled Randomized Phase II/III ExStress Study [NCT01969149]Phase 2/Phase 3110 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
A Randomised, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Single Centre, 60 Week Trial of Exenatide Once Weekly for the Treatment of Moderate Severity Parkinson's Disease [NCT01971242]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
GLP-1's Influence on Intestinal Blood Flow [NCT01988545]8 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-11-30Recruiting
A Randomized Trial Comparing Two Therapies: Basal Insulin/Glargine, Exenatide and Metformin Therapy (BET) or Basal Insulin/Glargine, Bolus Insulin Lispro and Metformin Therapy (BBT) in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Who Were Previously Treated by Basal Ins [NCT00960661]Phase 31,036 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
Brain Systems and Behaviors Underlying Response to Obesity Treatment in Children [NCT04520490]Phase 364 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-28Recruiting
FLAT-SUGAR: FLuctuATion Reduction With inSULin and Glp-1 Added togetheR [NCT01524705]Phase 4102 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Completed
A Retrospective Cohort Study of Acute Pancreatitis in Relation to Use of Byetta (Exenatide) and Other Antidiabetic Agents [NCT01077323]363,766 participants (Actual)Observational2004-09-30Completed
Effect of Exenatide in Obese Patients With Accelerated Gastric Emptying [NCT02160990]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
Exenatide and Postprandial Endothelial Dysfunction: Effects and Mechanisms [NCT01181986]Phase 476 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
EXCEED - A Pan-European Post-Authorisation Safety Study: Risk of Pancreatic Cancer Among Type 2 Diabetes Patients Who Initiated Exenatide as Compared With Those Who Initiated Other Non-Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists Based Glucose Lowering Drugs [NCT05663515]2,400 participants (Anticipated)Observational2024-01-01Not yet recruiting
The Clinical Application of 68Ga-NOTA-exendin-4 PET/CT in Detecting Insulinoma [NCT04979611]Phase 160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-08-01Recruiting
Metformin, Exenatide, and Glargine Insulin in Combination for Treatment of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00667732]Phase 441 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
A Randomized, Open-label, Active-controlled, 2-arm Parallel-group, Multicenter 24-week Study Followed by an Extension Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of AVE0010 Versus Exenatide on Top of Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Not Adequately Control [NCT00707031]Phase 3639 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Exenatide as an Adjunct to Nicotine Patch for Smoking Cessation and Prevention of Post-Cessation Weight Gain [NCT05610800]Phase 2216 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-07Recruiting
A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing the Effect of Exenatide, Sitagliptin or Glimepiride on Functional ß -Cell Mass in Patients With Impaired Fasting Glucose or Early Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00775684]47 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
An Open-Label Multi-Center Sub-Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of ITCA 650 in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes With High Baseline HbA1c [NCT01785771]Phase 3100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Decision by Sponsor)
Efficacy and Durability of Glucagon Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1 RA)/Thiazolidinedione Versus Basal Bolus Insulin Therapy in Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetic Patients (T2DM) Patients on Sulfonylurea Plus Metformin [NCT02887625]410 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-02-28Recruiting
Multicentre Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial Assessing Efficacy and Safety of Exenatide in the Treatment of Hypothalamic Obesity After Craniopharyngioma Therapy [NCT02860923]Phase 342 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-11Completed
A Two-Cohort, Single- and Repeat Dose Study to Examine the Pharmacokinetics, Tolerability, and Safety of Ready to Use Exenatide Once Weekly in Healthy Subjects and in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00894322]Phase 1/Phase 265 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
Durability of Early Initial Combination Therapy With Exenatide/Pioglitazone/Metformin vs Conventional Therapy in New Onset Type 2 Diabetes [NCT01107717]Phase 4521 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Active, not recruiting
Long-acting Exenatide: a Tool to Stop Cognitive Decline in Dysglycemic Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment? [NCT02847403]Phase 340 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-02-29Active, not recruiting
A 24 Week Monocentric Prospective Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial to Evaluate Efficacy of Combination of Exenatide and Dapagliflozin Compared to Dapagliflozin and Placebo and Its Effects on Hepatic, Myocardial and Pancreatic Fat Distribution in Patie [NCT03007329]Phase 434 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-08Completed
The Effect of Glucagon-like Peptide 1 (GLP-1) Receptor Agonist on Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity in Non-Stroke Volunteers (EGRABINS1) [NCT02838589]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-31Completed
Impact of Exenatide on Sleep Duration and Quality in Type 2 Diabetes [NCT01416649]8 participants (Actual)Observational2011-02-01Completed
A Phase 2, Randomized, Triple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Examine the Effect of Exenatide Monotherapy on Glucose Control in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00085969]Phase 299 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-09-30Completed
A Pilot Prospective Comparison of [68Ga]Ga-HBED-CC-exendin-4 and [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-exendin-4 PET/CT Imaging in the Same Group of Insulinoma Patients [NCT05034783]Early Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-10-01Active, not recruiting
Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Exenatide Once-Weekly Injection Compared to Once-Daily Insulin in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Oral Antidiabetic(s) [NCT00935532]Phase 3427 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
An Open-Label Exploratory Study to Investigate the Feasibility of Administering Exenatide by Continuous Subcutaneous Infusion to Healthy Subjects [NCT01857895]Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-16Completed
GLP-1 Analogue in Preventing Progression of Small Vessel Disease (GAPP-SVD) - A Pilot Study [NCT05356104]Phase 2110 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-25Recruiting
Visualizing Beta Cells in Patients With T2D Before and After Bariatric Surgery [NCT03182231]Phase 1/Phase 212 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-10-07Recruiting
A Phase II, 16-week, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Randomised, Multicentre Trial to Assess Effect on Glycaemic Control of Three Doses of HM11260C in Subjects With Inadequately Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Receiving a Stable Dose of Metfo [NCT02081118]Phase 2209 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Compare the Glycemic Effects, Safety, and Tolerability of Exenatide Long-Acting Release(Once Weekly) to Those of Sitagliptin and a Thiazolidinedione in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00637273]Phase 3514 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
A Multicentre, Randomised Controlled Trial of Exenatide Versus Standard Care in Acute Ischemic Stroke (TEXAIS) [NCT03287076]Phase 2350 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-23Active, not recruiting
Comparison of Dapagliflozin (DAPA) and Once-weekly Exenatide (EQW), Co-administered or Alone, DAPA/ Glucophage (DAPA/MET ER) and Phentermine/Topiramate (PHEN/TPM) ER on Metabolic Profiles and Body Composition in Obese PCOS Women [NCT02635386]Phase 3119 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-22Completed
A Comparison of the Haemodynamic and Metabolic Effects of Intravenous Glucagon-like Peptide-1, Glucagon and Glucagon-like Peptide-1:Glucagon Co-agonism in Healthy Male Participants [NCT03835013]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-02-11Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Study to Compare the Effects of Exenatide and Sitagliptin on Postprandial Glucose in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00477581]Phase 4102 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate The Effect of Metformin-GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Versus Oral Contraceptive (OC) Therapy on Reproductive Disorders and Cardiovascular Risks in Overweight Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) Patients [NCT03151005]Phase 470 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-01Completed
Cardioprotective Effects of Exenatide in Patients With ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ; Results of Exenatide Myocardial Protection In REvascularization (EMPIRE) Study [NCT01580514]Phase 4127 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
A Study by Scintigraphy to Evaluate the Effect of Exenatide on Gastric Emptying in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00517283]Phase 117 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
A Phase II, 12-week, Double-blind, Randomised, Parallel Group, Multi-centre, International Trial to Assess the Effect on Glycaemic Control of Five Doses of HM11260C Versus Placebo or Open-label Liraglutide in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT02057172]Phase 2254 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
Meal-time Administration of Exenatide for Glycaemic Control in Type 1 Diabetic Cases: A Randomised, Placebo-controlled Trial [NCT03017352]Phase 2108 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-31Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Exenatide as Monotherapy in Drug Naive Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00381342]Phase 3233 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
An Investigation Into the Effect of Dapagliflozin on Ketogenesis in Type 1 Diabetes [NCT02962492]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-11-30Not yet recruiting
Effect of Exenatide on 24-Hour Blood Glucose Profile Compared With Placebo in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Using Metformin or Metformin Plus a Thiazolidinedione [NCT00241423]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
An Exploratory Study of the Safety of Substituting Exenatide for Insulin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Who Have Been Using Insulin in Combination With Oral Antidiabetic Therapy [NCT00099333]Phase 249 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-02-29Completed
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Examine Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Exenatide Long-Acting Release Administered Weekly in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00103935]Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-02-28Completed
A Randomized, Single-Blind, Dose-Rising, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Tolerability of Exenatide in Adolescent Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00254254]Phase 213 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
The Effect of Exenatide on Single and Multiple Doses Oral Contraceptive Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Female Subjects [NCT00254800]Phase 138 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
An Open Label Study to Examine the Long Term Effect on Glucose Control (HbA1c) and Safety and Tolerability of Exenatide Given Two Times a Day to Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00111540]Phase 3456 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-11-30Completed
Identification and Clinical Relevance of an Oxytocin Deficient State: a Randomized, Crossover, Placebo-controlled, Proof-of-concept, Physiopathological Study (GLP1 Study) [NCT04897802]Phase 452 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-13Recruiting
A Double-Masked, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multiple Ascending Dose Phase 2 Study to Determine the Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of the GLP 1 Agonist HM11260C in Adult Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Stable Metformin [NCT01452451]Phase 272 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
Comparison of the Effects of Monotherapy With Exenatide or Metformin to Combined Exenatide and Metformin Therapy on Menstrual Cyclicity in Overweight Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome [NCT00344851]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Exenatide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Using Thiazolidinediones or Thiazolidinediones and Metformin [NCT00099320]Phase 3182 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-05-31Completed
Effect of Short-Term Intensive Insulin Sequential Exenatide Therapy on β-cell Function and Glycemic Remission Rate in Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetic Patients [NCT01776788]Phase 4156 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Completed
GLP-1 Therapy for Weight Loss and Improved Glucose Tolerance in Obese Children: A Randomized, Controlled, Pilot Study [NCT00886626]Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
Effects on Re-endothelialisation With Bydureon Treatment Add on to Insulin Versus Insulin Alone, Both in Combination With Metformin in Type 2 Diabetic Subjects [NCT02621489]Phase 438 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
Exenatide Study of Cardiovascular Event Lowering Trial (EXSCEL). A Randomized, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate Cardiovascular Outcomes After Treatment With Exenatide Once Weekly in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. [NCT01144338]Phase 314,752 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-18Completed
Treatment of Antipsychotic-associated Obesity With a GLP-1 Analogue [NCT01794429]Phase 345 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Completed
Pilot Study of Exenatide Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Gestational Diabetes [NCT00572689]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Withdrawn
A Pilot Study of Exendin-4 in Alzheimer s Disease [NCT01255163]Phase 257 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-21Terminated(stopped due to AstraZeneca withdrew support for the study.)
Study of Comparison the Treatment Effect Between Gastric Bypass and Exenatide in Type 2 Diabetes [NCT01435980]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-02-29Recruiting
Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Single-Dose, Crossover Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of BMS-686117 in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00508287]Phase 136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
Efficacy of Exenatide Compared With Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Using Metformin or Sulfonylurea for Whom Insulin is the Next Appropriate Therapy [NCT00099619]Phase 3138 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
Effect of Exenatide Treatment on Myocardial Fat Content, Left Ventricular Function, and Vascular Inflammation in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT01951651]Phase 424 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Triple-Blind, Parallel-Group, Long-Term, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Examine the Effect on Glucose Control (HbA1c) of AC2993 Given Two Times a Day in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Metformin Alone [NCT00039013]Phase 3336 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-03-31Completed
An Open-Label Study to Examine the Long-Term Effect on Glucose Control (HbA1c) and Safety of AC2993 Given Two Times a Day to Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Metformin, a Sulfonylurea, or Metformin and Sulfonylurea Combination [NCT00044668]Phase 3155 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-08-31Completed
Glucagon Like Peptide 1 Receptor (GLP1R) Expression and Beta-cell Mass in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes - the Role of Glucose Homeostasis on Uptake of Beta-cell Tracer Exendin-4 [NCT04733508]28 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-11-01Recruiting
A Cohort Study of the Benefits of Bydureon in Customary Clinical Care in the United States [NCT02974244]7,000 participants (Actual)Observational2014-10-28Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Triple-Blind, Parallel-Group, Long-Term, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Examine the Effect on Glucose Control (HbA1c) of AC2993 Given Twice Daily in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Metformin and a Sulfo [NCT00035984]Phase 3734 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-05-31Completed
Feasibility of Exenatide, a GLP-1R Agonist, for Treating Cocaine Use Disorder: A Case Series Study [NCT04941521]Phase 1/Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-06-24Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Triple-Blind, Parallel-Group, Long-Term, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Examine the Effect on Glucose Control (HbA1c) of AC2993 Given Two Times a Day in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated With a Sulfonylurea Al [NCT00039026]Phase 3377 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-02-28Completed
A Phase 2, Randomized, Triple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Short-Term, Dose-Response Study to Examine the Effect on Glucose Control and Safety and Tolerability of AC2993 Given Two Times a Day in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00044694]Phase 2156 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-08-31Completed
Comparative Effects of Antidiabetic Medications on Postprandial Hyperlipidemia, Free Fatty Acid Signaling, and Endothelial Dysfunction in Individuals With Prediabetes [NCT02104739]Phase 421 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
Study on the Effect of Metformin vs Metformin Combined With GLP-1 RA (Exenatide) on Overweight/Obese Patients With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) [NCT04029272]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-20Recruiting
The Microvascular Function of GLP-1 and Its Analogues in Humans, in Vivo: the Role of DPP-IV Inhibition [NCT01677104]63 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-08-31Completed
Effect of Exenatide on Abdominal Fat Distribution in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Pretreated With Metformin [NCT00701935]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Enrollment was much slower than anticipated, leading to a decision to terminate the study early for enrollment futility.)
Islet Transplantation in Type 1 Diabetic Patients Using the Edmonton Protocol of Steroid Free Immunosuppression [NCT00566813]Phase 1/Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-30Completed
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Four Second Line Pharmacological Strategies in Type 2 Diabetes Study [NCT05220917]781,430 participants (Anticipated)Observational2021-08-01Active, not recruiting
The Effects of Short-Term Exenatide Therapy on the Beta-Cell Function and Long-term Glycemic Control in Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetic Patients [NCT01270191]Phase 4160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-11-30Recruiting
The Use of Incretin-based Drugs and the Risk of Pancreatic Cancer in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT02475499]886,172 participants (Actual)Observational2014-03-31Completed
Treatment With Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor, Exenatide, in Patients With Diabetes and Heart Failure With Normal Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction [NCT00799435]Phase 42 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Inability to recruit adequate Sample Size who met the entry criteria)
A Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study of Exenatide for the Treatment of Weight Gain Associated With Olanzapine in Obese Adults With Bipolar Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder [NCT00845507]Phase 454 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
Acute Effects of a Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Analog, Exenatide, on Gastrointestinal Motor Function and Permeability in Patients With Short Bowel Syndrome on Home Parenteral Nutrition [NCT01818648]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Study was withdrawn by PI due to decision to study a different medication.)
Evaluation of Insulin Glargine and Exenatide: A Randomized Clinical Trial With Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Ambulatory Glucose Profile Analysis [NCT01089569]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
Pilot Study of Exenatide Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Gestational Diabetes [NCT05482789]Phase 413 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-12Recruiting
A Randomized, Open-label, Placebo-controlled, Repeat-dose Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of 5 Micrograms Exenatide Administered Subcutaneously Twice Daily for 7 Days in Healthy Normal Volunteers and in Subjects With Type 2 Diabe [NCT00259896]Phase 130 participants Interventional2005-10-31Completed
Clinical and Histopathological Effect of GLP-1 Analogs on Psoriasis in Type 2 Diabetic Patients [NCT01687582]10 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
Intensive Exenatide Therapy in Hyperglycemic Patients Admitted to the Coronary Intensive Care Unit [NCT00736229]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Exenatide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Using Metformin or Sulfonylureas and Metformin [NCT00324363]Phase 3466 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
Effects of NovoLog® Mix 70/30 (Biphasic Insulin Aspart 70/30) BID and QD vs. Byetta™ Exenatide) BID on Glycemic Control: A Multicenter, 24-Week, Open-Label, Parallel Group Study in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Not Achieving Glycemic Targets With [NCT00313001]Phase 3373 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
Effects of the GLP-1 Exenatide on Intrinsic Brain Activity in Lean and Obese Women [NCT01501084]Phase 134 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
The Effect of Exenatide on Brown Adipose Tissue Activity and Energy Expenditure in Healthy Young Men [NCT03002675]Phase 424 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-08-31Recruiting
The Chronic and Acute Postprandial Vascular Effects of Exenatide vs. Metformin in Abdominally Obese Patients With Impaired Glucose Tolerance [NCT00546728]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
A Phase II Trial to Examine the Effect of Subcutaneous Exenatide (Bydureon®) on Glucose Control in Patients With Type I Diabetes [NCT01928329]Phase 279 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
Visualizing Beta Cells in Patients With Hyperinsulinemic Hypoglycemia After Bariatric Surgery [NCT03182192]Phase 112 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-04-01Recruiting
A 26-Week Randomized, Open-label, Active Controlled, Parallel-group, Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of the Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on GLP-1 Receptor Agonist and [NCT02787551]Phase 3514 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-06Completed
A Phase IV, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Trial to Assess the Effect of 12-week Treatment With the Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist (GLP-1RA) Liraglutide or Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor (DPP-4i) Sitagliptin on th [NCT01744236]Phase 470 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
Effects of Exenatide on Obesity and/or Diabetes Mellitus Due to Hypothalamic Damage [NCT01783717]10 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-12-31Recruiting
68Ga-NODAGA-exendin-4 PET/CT in Patients With AHH - a Prospective Comparative Evaluation of Preoperative Imaging [NCT03189953]Phase 1/Phase 256 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-04-30Completed
Effects of Exenatide on Motor Function and the Brain [NCT03456687]Phase 15 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-05Completed
A Phase 1, Randomized, Single-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multiple-dose, Two-sequence, Cross-over Study to Evaluate the Effect of Ranolazine on Glucagon Secretion in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Followed by An Open-label, Single Dose, Exenatide [NCT01843127]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
Impact of Exenatide on Sleep and Circadian Function in Type 2 Diabetes: A Pilot Study [NCT01136798]18 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-01Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active Comparator, Double-Blind, Multi-Center Study to Compare the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of ITCA 650 to Sitagliptin as Add-on Therapy to Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT01455909]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Withdrawn
Effect of Exenatide on Brain Glucose Uptake in Relations to Pancreatic, Adipose Tissue, and Hepatic Function [NCT01588418]Phase 415 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
A Randomized Double-blind, Parallel-group Study to Evaluate the Effect of BYDUREON Compared With Placebo on 24-hour Glucose Control in Metformin-treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT02288273]Phase 4239 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
Exenatide Once Weekly for Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT02975297]Phase 1/Phase 284 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Exenatide Taken Before Lunch and Before Dinner Compared With Before Breakfast and Before Dinner in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Using Oral Antidiabetic Therapy [NCT00359879]Phase 3377 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
Changes in Bone Turnover With Exposure to a GLP-1 Receptor Agonist (UAB Core Center for Basic Skeletal Research) [NCT01381926]Phase 414 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Terminated(stopped due to unavailability of study drug and matching placebo)
A Dose Response Study to Assess the Effect on Glucose Control and Safety and Tolerability of LY2148568 in Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Who Are Treated With Oral Antidiabetic(s) But Not Well Controlled [NCT00382239]Phase 2153 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
Evaluation of the Clinical and Economic Outcomes Associated With Exenatide Versus Basal Insulin in People With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT02987348]18,000 participants (Actual)Observational2015-06-30Completed
The Effects of Exenatide, a GLP-1 Agonist, on Alcohol Self-Administration in Heavy Drinkers [NCT03645408]Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-02Terminated(stopped due to Due to COVID-19 hospital-wide policies halting recruitment)
Exenatide-test for Diagnosing Endogenous Hyperinsulinemic Hypoglycemia [NCT04909333]28 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-04-29Recruiting
Efficacy and Mechanism of Exenatide on Improving Heart Function in Type 2 Diabetes With Heart Failure Patients [NCT02344641]234 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-01-31Not yet recruiting
A Randomized,Active-controlled,Open-label Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effect of GLP-1 Receptor Agonist (Exenatide Injection) in Combination With Metformin Therapy Compared to Premixed Insulin (BIAsp30) in Combination With Metformin Therapy on Diabetes [NCT03018665]Phase 4200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-02-28Not yet recruiting
A Randomized, Multi-Center Study to Evaluate Cardiovascular Outcomes With ITCA 650 in Patients Treated With Standard of Care for Type 2 Diabetes [NCT01455896]Phase 34,156 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
New Onset Type 1 Diabetes: Role of Exenatide [NCT01269034]Phase 413 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
Comparison of Exenatide, Insulin or Pioglitazone on Glycaemic Control and β-cell Function in Drug-naïve Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Multicentre Randomized Parallel-group Trial [NCT01147627]416 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
Effect of Exenatide Treatment on Hepatic Fat Content and Plasma Adipocytokine Levels in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT01432405]Phase 424 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
Exenatide in Extreme Pediatric Obesity [NCT01237197]Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active Comparator, Double-Blind, Multi-Center Study to Compare the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of ITCA 650 to Glimepiride as Add-on Therapy to Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT01455883]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Withdrawn
Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of ITCA 650 in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT01455857]Phase 3460 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
Effects of Exenatide on Obesity and Appetite in Overweight Patients With Prader-Willi Syndrome [NCT01444898]10 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
Pilot Study of Extended-release Exenatide to Improve Glucose Control and Reduce Systemic Inflammation in Diabetic, HIV-infected Adults on Antiretroviral Therapy [NCT01791465]Phase 46 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Terminated(stopped due to This study was terminated after 6 patients due to loss of funding)
A Randomized, Open-label, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Exploratory Study on the Effects of Repeated Doses of Albiglutide Compared to Exenatide on Gastric Myoelectrical Activity and Gastric Emptying in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT02793154]Phase 44 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-26Terminated(stopped due to Early termination due to insufficient enrollment.)
An Exploratory Randomized, 2-Part, Single-blind, 2-Period Crossover Study Comparing the Effect of Albiglutide With Exenatide on Regional Brain Activity Related to Nausea in Healthy Volunteers [NCT02802514]Phase 45 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-20Terminated
Phase 1-2 Study of the Pharmacology of Exenatide in Pediatric Sepsis [NCT01573806]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Withdrawn(stopped due to No funding)
DIabetes REsearCh on Patient sTratification (DIRECT): GLP-1R Agonists [NCT01575301]411 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active Comparator, Double-Blind, Multi-Center Study to Compare the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of ITCA 650 to Sitagliptin as Add-on Therapy to Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT01455870]Phase 3535 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
Impact of Intravenous Exenatide Versus Insulin on Quality of Life in Cardiac Surgery Patients: an Ancillary Study of the ExSTRESS Phase II/III Clinical Trial [NCT02432976]Phase 2/Phase 364 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Completed
A 12/24-weeks, Open, Multi-centre, Phase IV Study on Safety and Efficacy of 2mg Exenatide Once Weekly (Bydureon) in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT02533453]Phase 4110 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-28Completed
Effects of GLP-1 Analogue Combined With Metformin and Metformin on Gonadal and Metabolic Profiles in Chinese Overweight/Obese PCOS Patients With Hyperandrogenemia. [NCT04969627]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-04Completed
GLP-1 Agonism for Blocking Cocaine Euphoria and Self-Administration [NCT02302976]Phase 113 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
Pathophysiological Study of the Increase in Pancreatic Volume in Type 2 Diabetes Treatments. [NCT02244164]5 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Recruitment too slow)
Exendin PET/CT for Paragangliomas [NCT05418907]10 participants (Anticipated)Observational2022-06-01Recruiting
Effects of Exenatide on Body Weight in Patients With Hypothalamic Obesity [NCT01484873]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Completed
The Effect of Exenatide on Body Weight, Energy Expenditure and Hunger in Obese Women Without Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00456885]Phase 441 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
The Pharmacokinetic Comparison and Bioequivalence Evaluation of Two 10-µg Recombinant Exendin-4 Formulations in Chinese Healthy Male Subjects [NCT03199261]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-23Completed
Comparison of Exenatide vs. Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 on Glucose Variability in Type 2 Diabetes : a Randomised Open Parallel-controlled Study [NCT02449603]Phase 4150 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-30Completed
A Randomized, Open, Comparative to the Positive-Controlled, Parallel Group, Multiple Dose Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of PB-119 to Subjects Newly Diagnosed as Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT03059719]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-08Completed
GLP-1 Analogs for Neuroprotection After Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest, a Randomized Clinical Trail [NCT02442791]120 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
Intravenous Exenatide Infusion in Critically Ill Patients With Acute Brain Injury [NCT02058940]Phase 48 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-31Completed
Effect of Exenatide on Cortisol Secretion [NCT03160261]Phase 410 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-07Completed
The Effect of Exenatide Compared to Lantus Insulin on Vascular Function Before and After a Meal Tolerance Test in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT00353834]Phase 472 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
A Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of ITCA 650 in Subjects With Mild and Moderate Renal Impairment Compared to the Pharmacokinetics of Subjects With Normal Renal Function [NCT02320045]Phase 138 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy and Albuminuria in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT03029351]Phase 415 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-10Terminated(stopped due to termination by sponsor)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active Comparator, Double-Blind, Multi-Center Study to Compare the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of ITCA 650 to Glimepiride as Add-on Therapy to Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT01455922]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Withdrawn
Islet Transplantation in Type 1 Diabetic Patients Using the UIC Protocol, Phase 3 [NCT00679042]Phase 321 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-05Active, not recruiting
Effects Of Exenatide (Byetta®) On Liver Biochemistry, Liver Histology And Lipid Metabolism In Patients With Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease [NCT00529204]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Lack of recruitment)
A Prospective Study of Patterns, Predictors, and Mechanisms of Weight Loss With Exenatide Treatment in Overweight and Obese Women Without Diabetes [NCT01590433]Phase 4249 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
An Open Label, Single Site, 48 Week, Randomised Controlled Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Exenatide Once-weekly in the Treatment of Patients With Multiple System Atrophy [NCT04431713]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-16Recruiting
A GLP-1 Receptor PET Imaging Substudy Within the VER-A-T1D Trial Investigating the Effects on Beta Cell Mass [NCT04615910]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-01Recruiting
Role of Exenatide in Treatment of NASH-a Pilot Study [NCT00650546]Phase 2/Phase 38 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
Exenatide (Byetta) Vs Pramlintide (Symlin): Role in Post-prandial Hyperglycemia [NCT01269047]Phase 437 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Semaglutide Once-weekly Versus Exenatide ER 2.0 mg Once-weekly as add-on to 1-2 Oral Antidiabetic Drugs (OADs) in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN™ 3 - vs. QW GLP-1) [NCT01885208]Phase 3813 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-02Completed
Combined Effects of SGLT2 Inhibition and GLP-1 Receptor Agonism on Food Intake, Body Weight and Central Satiety and Reward Circuits in Obese T2DM Patients [NCT03361098]Phase 465 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-18Completed
The Effect of the GLP-1 Receptor Agonists on Blood Levels of Lipoprotein (a) [NCT02501850]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-10-31Recruiting
A Phase Ib, Randomized, Open-Label, Multi-Center, 4-Week Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of ITCA 650 in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT01798264]Phase 144 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Basal Insulin Glargine Combination With Exenatide Bid vs Switching Premix Human Insulin to Aspart30 in T2DM With Inadequate Glycaemic Control on Premixed Human Insulin and Metformin: a Randomized, Open, Parallel Trial [NCT02467920]Phase 4349 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-31Completed
A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Multi-Center Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Exenatide Once Weekly in Adolescents With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT01554618]Phase 384 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-02Completed
An Open-Label, Multi-Center, Randomized, Phase 3b Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Switching to One of Two Dosing Strategies of ITCA 650 in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Receiving Stable Doses of Liraglutide [NCT02638805]Phase 3136 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
Exenatide Inpatient Trial: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial on the Safety and Efficacy of Exenatide (Byetta®) Therapy for the Inpatient Management of General Medicine and Surgery Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT02455076]Phase 4150 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
Preserving Beta-cell Function in Type 2 Diabetes With Exenatide and Insulin (PREVAIL) [NCT02194595]Phase 3105 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
A PET/CT Study to Assess the Receptor Occupancy by SAR425899 After Repeat Dosing Using Radiolabelled Tracers for the Glucagon and GLP-1 Receptor in Overweight to Obese T2DM Patients [NCT03350191]Phase 113 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-20Completed
An Individualized treatMent aPproach for oldER patIents: A Randomized, Controlled stUdy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (IMPERIUM) [NCT02072096]Phase 4192 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Terminated(stopped due to The trial was terminated per protocol because of lack of feasibility.)
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group, Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Once Weekly Exenatide Therapy Added to Titrated Basal Insulin Glargine Compared to Placebo Added to Titrated Basal Insulin Gl [NCT02229383]Phase 3464 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-06Completed
Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of LY3053102 With 12 Weeks of Treatment in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT02020616]Phase 1/Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Lack of Efficacy)
A Randomized, Parallel-Group Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of NPM-119 (Exenatide Implant) in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT05670379]Phase 116 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-03-31Not yet recruiting
A Randomized, Long-Term, Open-Label, 3-Arm, Multicenter Study to Compare the Glycemic Effects, Safety, and Tolerability of Exenatide Once Weekly Suspension to Sitagliptin and Placebo in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT01652729]Phase 3365 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Completed
Comparison of the Oxyntomodulin Analog, LY2944876, to Once-Weekly Exenatide and to Placebo in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT02119819]Phase 2420 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00082381 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Hypoglycemic Events
NCT00082381 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <=7%
NCT00082381 (7) [back to overview]Change in 7-point Self-monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Profile
NCT00082381 (7) [back to overview]Change in Rate of Hypoglycemic Events
NCT00082381 (7) [back to overview]Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
NCT00082381 (7) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Serum Glucose
NCT00082381 (7) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight
NCT00082407 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <=7%
NCT00082407 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Hypoglycemic Events
NCT00082407 (7) [back to overview]Change in 7-point Self-monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Profile
NCT00082407 (7) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight
NCT00082407 (7) [back to overview]Change in Rate of Hypoglycemic Events
NCT00082407 (7) [back to overview]Change in Glcosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
NCT00082407 (7) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Serum Glucose
NCT00097500 (9) [back to overview]Beta-cell Function 4 Weeks After Cessation of Therapy
NCT00097500 (9) [back to overview]Beta-cell Function After 52 Weeks of Therapy
NCT00097500 (9) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight
NCT00097500 (9) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose
NCT00097500 (9) [back to overview]Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
NCT00097500 (9) [back to overview]Change in First Phase C-peptide Release
NCT00097500 (9) [back to overview]Change in Second Phase C-peptide Release
NCT00097500 (9) [back to overview]M-value at Baseline, Week 52 and Week 56
NCT00097500 (9) [back to overview]Seven Point Self Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Measurements
NCT00135330 (28) [back to overview]Change in Fasting HDL Cholesterol
NCT00135330 (28) [back to overview]Change in Waist-to-hip Ratio
NCT00135330 (28) [back to overview]Hypoglycemia Rate Per 30 Days Per Patient
NCT00135330 (28) [back to overview]Incidence of Hypoglycemia Events
NCT00135330 (28) [back to overview]Change in ASIiAUC During a Hyperglycemic Clamp Test.
NCT00135330 (28) [back to overview]Change in AUC for C-peptide During a Meal Challenge Test (MCT).
NCT00135330 (28) [back to overview]Change in AUC for Glucose During a Meal Challenge Test (MCT).
NCT00135330 (28) [back to overview]Change in Body Fat Mass During a Meal Challenge Test (MCT)
NCT00135330 (28) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight
NCT00135330 (28) [back to overview]Pedal Edema Score
NCT00135330 (28) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Insulin
NCT00135330 (28) [back to overview]Change in Fasting LDL Cholesterol
NCT00135330 (28) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Proinsulin
NCT00135330 (28) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Serum Glucose Concentration.
NCT00135330 (28) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Total Cholesterol.
NCT00135330 (28) [back to overview]Ratio (Value at Endpoint Divided by Value at Baseline) of AUC for Insulin During a Meal Challenge Test (MCT).
NCT00135330 (28) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c
NCT00135330 (28) [back to overview]Change in Hip Circumference
NCT00135330 (28) [back to overview]Change in Incremental for Postprandial C-peptide During Meal Challenge Test (MCT).
NCT00135330 (28) [back to overview]Change in Incremental for Postprandial Glucose During a Meal Challenge Test (MCT).
NCT00135330 (28) [back to overview]Change in Incremental for Postprandial Insulin During Meal Challenge Test (MCT).
NCT00135330 (28) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Triglycerides
NCT00135330 (28) [back to overview]Change in Insulin iAUC From Baseline to Endpoint.
NCT00135330 (28) [back to overview]Change in Insulin Sensitivity Index as Measured by M-value.
NCT00135330 (28) [back to overview]Change in Lean Body Mass During a Meal Challenge Test (MCT)
NCT00135330 (28) [back to overview]Change in Percent Body Fat During a Meal Challenge Test (MCT)
NCT00135330 (28) [back to overview]Change in Waist Circumference
NCT00135330 (28) [back to overview]Change in Insulin AUC in the First Stage From Baseline to Endpoint.
NCT00308139 (24) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 30
NCT00308139 (24) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 364
NCT00308139 (24) [back to overview]Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 30
NCT00308139 (24) [back to overview]Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 364
NCT00308139 (24) [back to overview]Change in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline to Week 364
NCT00308139 (24) [back to overview]Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 30
NCT00308139 (24) [back to overview]Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 364
NCT00308139 (24) [back to overview]Exenatide LAR Steady State Concentration From Week 29 to Week 30
NCT00308139 (24) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Target of <=6.0%
NCT00308139 (24) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Target of <=6.5%
NCT00308139 (24) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Target of <=6.5%
NCT00308139 (24) [back to overview]Ratio of Triglycerides at Week 364 to Baseline
NCT00308139 (24) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Target of <7%
NCT00308139 (24) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Target of <7%
NCT00308139 (24) [back to overview]Ratio of Triglycerides at Week 30 to Baseline
NCT00308139 (24) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline to Week 364
NCT00308139 (24) [back to overview]Change in Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 364
NCT00308139 (24) [back to overview]Change in Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 30
NCT00308139 (24) [back to overview]Assessment on Event Rate of Treatment-emergent Hypoglycemic Events With SU Use at Screening
NCT00308139 (24) [back to overview]Assessment on Event Rate of Treatment-emergent Hypoglycemic Events With Non-SU Use at Screening
NCT00308139 (24) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 364
NCT00308139 (24) [back to overview]Change in 2 Hours (2h) Postprandial Glucose From Baseline to Week 14
NCT00308139 (24) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 30
NCT00308139 (24) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline to Week 30
NCT00353834 (2) [back to overview]First Will be the Changes in TNG Stimulated Arterial Dilation (Endothelial-independent) in Subjects Treated With Exenatide Compared With Subjects Treated With Lantus at the End of the Study Compared to Baseline Measurements
NCT00353834 (2) [back to overview]The Primary Endpoint Was the Change in FMD at the End of the Study Compared to Baseline Measurements in Subjects Treated With Exenatide Compared to Subjects Treated With Lantus.
NCT00359762 (27) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Treatment Failure
NCT00359762 (27) [back to overview]Triglycerides at Year 3
NCT00359762 (27) [back to overview]Total Cholesterol at Year 3
NCT00359762 (27) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure
NCT00359762 (27) [back to overview]Systolic Blood Pressure at Year 3
NCT00359762 (27) [back to overview]Ratio of the 30 Minute Increment in Plasma Insulin Concentration and the 30 Minute Increment in Plasma Glucose During the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (DI30/DG30 Ratio) at Year 3
NCT00359762 (27) [back to overview]High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol at Year 3
NCT00359762 (27) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Year 2 for Patients Not Randomized at Entry in Period III
NCT00359762 (27) [back to overview]Heart Rate at Year 3
NCT00359762 (27) [back to overview]Fasting Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio at Year 3
NCT00359762 (27) [back to overview]Fasting Plasma Glucose at Year 3
NCT00359762 (27) [back to overview]Disposition Index at Year 3
NCT00359762 (27) [back to overview]Diastolic Blood Pressure at Year 3
NCT00359762 (27) [back to overview]Change in Postprandial (2 Hours) Plasma Glucose From Baseline to Endpoint
NCT00359762 (27) [back to overview]Change in HOMA-B From Baseline to Endpoint
NCT00359762 (27) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Endpoint
NCT00359762 (27) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio From Baseline to Endpoint.
NCT00359762 (27) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline to Endpoint
NCT00359762 (27) [back to overview]Change in Disposition Index From Baseline to Endpoint
NCT00359762 (27) [back to overview]Change in DI30/DG30 Ratio From Baseline to Endpoint
NCT00359762 (27) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Year 3
NCT00359762 (27) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Year 3
NCT00359762 (27) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Year 2 for Patients Randomized at Entry in Period III
NCT00359762 (27) [back to overview]Postprandial (2 Hours) Plasma Glucose at Year 3
NCT00359762 (27) [back to overview]Hypoglycemia Rate Per Year in Period III
NCT00359762 (27) [back to overview]Hypoglycemia Rate Per Year
NCT00359762 (27) [back to overview]Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta-cell Function (HOMA-B) at Year 3
NCT00360334 (28) [back to overview]Percent of Patients Achieving HbA1c < 6.5%
NCT00360334 (28) [back to overview]Change in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol
NCT00360334 (28) [back to overview]Percent of Patients Achieving 10% Weight Loss
NCT00360334 (28) [back to overview]Percent Change in Body Weight
NCT00360334 (28) [back to overview]Nocturnal Hypoglycemic Rate Per 30 Days
NCT00360334 (28) [back to overview]Incidence of Severe Hypoglycemic Episodes
NCT00360334 (28) [back to overview]Incidence of Nocturnal Hypoglycemic Episodes
NCT00360334 (28) [back to overview]Percent of Patients Achieving 5% Weight Loss
NCT00360334 (28) [back to overview]Incidence of Hypoglycemic Episodes
NCT00360334 (28) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Serum Triglycerides
NCT00360334 (28) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Serum Glucose
NCT00360334 (28) [back to overview]Percent of Patients Achieving HbA1c < 7%
NCT00360334 (28) [back to overview]Change in Apolipoprotein-B
NCT00360334 (28) [back to overview]Change in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol
NCT00360334 (28) [back to overview]Change in TC to HDL Cholesterol Ratio
NCT00360334 (28) [back to overview]Hypoglycemic Rate Per 30 Days
NCT00360334 (28) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Serum Total Cholesterol (TC)
NCT00360334 (28) [back to overview]Change in Waist-to-hip Ratio
NCT00360334 (28) [back to overview]Change in Waist Circumference
NCT00360334 (28) [back to overview]Change in Systolic Blood Pressure
NCT00360334 (28) [back to overview]Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure
NCT00360334 (28) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight
NCT00360334 (28) [back to overview]Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)
NCT00360334 (28) [back to overview]Change in 7 Point Self Monitored Blood Glucose Profile
NCT00360334 (28) [back to overview]Severe Hypoglycemic Rate Per 30 Days
NCT00360334 (28) [back to overview]Percent of Patients Who Achieved HbA1c ≤ 7.4% With Minimal Weight Gain (≤ 1kg)
NCT00360334 (28) [back to overview]Percent of Patients Who Achieved HbA1c ≤ 7.4% and Weight Gain ≤ 0.5kg
NCT00360334 (28) [back to overview]Percent of Patients Achieving HbA1c ≤ 7.4%
NCT00375492 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol at Week 24
NCT00375492 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 24
NCT00375492 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Weight
NCT00375492 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 6-point Self Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Profile at Week 24
NCT00375492 (12) [back to overview]Ratio of Triglycerides at Week 24 to Triglycerides at Baseline
NCT00375492 (12) [back to overview]Ratio of Homeostatic Model Assessment-Insulin Sensitivity (HOMA-S) at Week 24 to HOMA-S at Baseline
NCT00375492 (12) [back to overview]Ratio of Homeostatic Model Assessment-Beta Cell (HOMA-B) at Week 24 to HOMA-B at Baseline
NCT00375492 (12) [back to overview]Rate of Hypoglycemic Events
NCT00375492 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hypoglycemic Events During the Study
NCT00375492 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol at Week 24
NCT00375492 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference at Week 24
NCT00375492 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Week 24
NCT00434954 (12) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight
NCT00434954 (12) [back to overview]Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)
NCT00434954 (12) [back to overview]Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
NCT00434954 (12) [back to overview]Incidence of Nocturnal Hypoglycemia (Percentage of Subjects Who Experienced at Least One Episode of Nocturnal Hypoglycemia During the 26 Week Treatment Period)
NCT00434954 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Target of < 6.5%
NCT00434954 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Target of < 7.0%
NCT00434954 (12) [back to overview]7 Point Self-monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Profiles
NCT00434954 (12) [back to overview]Blood Lipid Levels
NCT00434954 (12) [back to overview]Incidence of Hypoglycemia (Percentage of Participants With at Least One Hypoglycemic Episode)
NCT00434954 (12) [back to overview]Patient Reported Outcomes: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)
NCT00434954 (12) [back to overview]Patient Reported Outcomes: Quality of Life (SF-12)
NCT00434954 (12) [back to overview]Incidence of Hypoglycemic Episodes [Blood Glucose <= 3.0 mmol/L or Severe] (Percentage of Subjects Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-emergent Hypoglycemic Episode During the 26-week Treatment Period)
NCT00456300 (1) [back to overview]Mean Plasma Glucose Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Blood Glucose Concentration in the Exenatide 1.25 mcg or Exenatide 2.5 mcg Treated Groups Along With Insulin, Compared to Insulin Alone
NCT00456885 (13) [back to overview]Change in Two Hour Glucose
NCT00456885 (13) [back to overview]Change in Insulin
NCT00456885 (13) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Glucose
NCT00456885 (13) [back to overview]Change in Body Mass Index
NCT00456885 (13) [back to overview]Adiponectin
NCT00456885 (13) [back to overview]Changes in Body Composition
NCT00456885 (13) [back to overview]Change in Waist Circumference
NCT00456885 (13) [back to overview]Systolic Blood Pressure
NCT00456885 (13) [back to overview]REE
NCT00456885 (13) [back to overview]HOMA Score
NCT00456885 (13) [back to overview]Diastolic Blood Pressure
NCT00456885 (13) [back to overview]Changes in Leptin
NCT00456885 (13) [back to overview]Change in Weight
NCT00500370 (16) [back to overview]Change in Total Cholesterol
NCT00500370 (16) [back to overview]Change in Serum Glucose AUC Levels Following Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT)
NCT00500370 (16) [back to overview]Change in Waist-to-hip Ratio
NCT00500370 (16) [back to overview]Incidence of Patients That Demonstrate Normalization of Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) and/or Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT)
NCT00500370 (16) [back to overview]Incidence of Patients That Demonstrate Overt Signs of Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosis
NCT00500370 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Experiencing >=5% Weight Loss
NCT00500370 (16) [back to overview]Ratio of Endpoint (LOCF) to Baseline for Fasting Triglycerides (Logarithmically Transformed)
NCT00500370 (16) [back to overview]Ratio of Endpoint (LOCF) to Baseline for Homeostatic Model Assessment-Insulin Sensitivity (HOMA-S) (Logarithmically Transformed)
NCT00500370 (16) [back to overview]Ratio of Endpoint (LOCF) to Baseline for Homeostatic Model Assessment-Beta Cell (HOMA-B) (Logarithmically Transformed)
NCT00500370 (16) [back to overview]Change in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol
NCT00500370 (16) [back to overview]Change in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)
NCT00500370 (16) [back to overview]Change in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol
NCT00500370 (16) [back to overview]Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
NCT00500370 (16) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Serum Glucose
NCT00500370 (16) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight
NCT00500370 (16) [back to overview]Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)
NCT00516048 (3) [back to overview]Treatment-emergent Antibody Status (Maximum Titer Level Experienced)
NCT00516048 (3) [back to overview]Incidence of Potentially Immune-related Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
NCT00516048 (3) [back to overview]Change in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) From Baseline to Endpoint
NCT00516074 (6) [back to overview]Change in Nighttime (2400-0600) Heart Rate From Baseline to Endpoint
NCT00516074 (6) [back to overview]Change in Mean 24-hour Heart Rate From Baseline to Endpoint
NCT00516074 (6) [back to overview]Change in Mean 24 Hour Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Endpoint
NCT00516074 (6) [back to overview]Change in Mean 24 Hour Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Endpoint
NCT00516074 (6) [back to overview]Change in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) From Baseline to Endpoint
NCT00516074 (6) [back to overview]Change in Daytime Heart Rate From Baseline to Endpoint
NCT00518115 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Achieved Target Values for HbA1c <6.5% and >=6.5% to <7% at Weeks 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 15, and 16
NCT00518115 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin at Weeks 5, 8, 12, and 16
NCT00518115 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 15, and 16
NCT00518115 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Functional Living Index - Emesis (FLIE) Scores at Week 16
NCT00518115 (18) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 16
NCT00518115 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 15, and 16
NCT00518115 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting C-peptide at Weeks 5, 8, 12, and 16
NCT00518115 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Fructosamine at Weeks 5, 8, 12, and 16
NCT00518115 (18) [back to overview]Mean Half-maximal Effective Concentration (EC50) of Albiglutide for HbA1c and FPG
NCT00518115 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Glucagon at Weeks 5, 8, 12, and 16
NCT00518115 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Response to Questions on the Hunger, Craving, and Fullness Questionnaire (HCFQ) at Week 16
NCT00518115 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Triglycerides, Free Fatty Acids, Total Cholesterol, Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, and High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Weeks 5, 8, 12, and 16
NCT00518115 (18) [back to overview]Mean Volume of Distribution of Albiglutide
NCT00518115 (18) [back to overview]Mean Clearance of Albiglutide
NCT00518115 (18) [back to overview]Mean Absorption Rate of Albiglutide
NCT00518115 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference at Week 16
NCT00518115 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 16
NCT00518115 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 16
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in High-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol at Week 26
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Glycosylated A1c (HbA1c), Weeks 26-78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) at Week 78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) at Week 26
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Free Fatty Acid, Weeks 26-78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Free Fatty Acid at Week 78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Free Fatty Acid at Week 26
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose, Weeks 26-78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight, Weeks 26-78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Low-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol at Week 78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight at Week 26
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Beta-cell Function, Weeks 26-78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Beta-cell Function at Week 78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Beta-cell Function at Week 26
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Total Cholesterol, Weeks 26-78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Apolipoprotein B, Weeks 26-78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Apolipoprotein B at Week 78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Apolipoprotein B at Week 26
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight at Week 78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Triglyceride at Week 78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Triglyceride, Weeks 26-78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Total Cholesterol at Week 78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Total Cholesterol at Week 26
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Mean Prandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Lunch, Weeks 26-78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Mean Prandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Lunch at Week 78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Mean Prandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Lunch at Week 26
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Mean Prandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Dinner, Weeks 26-78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Mean Prandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Dinner at Week 78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Very Low-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol at Week 26
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Very Low-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol at Week 78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Very Low-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol, Weeks 26-78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Hypoglycaemic Episodes at Week 26
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Triglyceride at Week 26
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Hypoglyceamic Episodes, Weeks 26-78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Achieving Treatment Target of Either HbA1c < 7.0% or =< 6.5% at Week 26
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Achieving Treatment Target of Either HbA1c < 7.0% or =< 6.5% at Week 78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Mean Prandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Dinner at Week 26
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Mean Prandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Breakfast, Weeks 26-78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Mean Prandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Breakfast at Week 78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Mean Prandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Breakfast at Week 26
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Mean Postprandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Lunch, Weeks 26-78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Mean Postprandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Lunch at Week 78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Mean Postprandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Lunch at Week 26
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Mean Postprandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Dinner, Weeks 26-78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Mean Postprandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Dinner at Week 78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Mean Postprandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Dinner at Week 26
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Mean Postprandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Breakfast, Weeks 26-78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Mean Postprandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Breakfast at Week 78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Mean Postprandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Breakfast at Week 26
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Low-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol, Weeks 26-78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in Low-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol at Week 26
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in High-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol, Weeks 26-78
NCT00518882 (55) [back to overview]Change in High-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol at Week 78
NCT00529204 (3) [back to overview]Changes in Components of Liver Histology at Baseline and Week 24 Including Steatosis, Inflammation and Fibrosis
NCT00529204 (3) [back to overview]Safety of Exenatide in Patients With NAFLD and Type 2 Diabetes
NCT00529204 (3) [back to overview]Reduction in Serum ALT From Baseline to 24 Weeks of Exenatide Therapy
NCT00546728 (1) [back to overview]Change in Reactive Hyperemic Index Over the 3-month Treatment Period
NCT00566813 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events Including Laboratory Abnormalities at the End of Study Participation
NCT00566813 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than or Equal to 6.5 & Free of Severe Hypoglycemic Events
NCT00566813 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Insulin Independence at End of Study Participation
NCT00577824 (17) [back to overview]Change in 1,5-anhydroglucitol
NCT00577824 (17) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Blood Glucose
NCT00577824 (17) [back to overview]Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) From Baseline to Week 24
NCT00577824 (17) [back to overview]Change in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)
NCT00577824 (17) [back to overview]Change in Homeostasis Model Assessment - Beta Cell Function (HOMA-B)
NCT00577824 (17) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight
NCT00577824 (17) [back to overview]Change in Homeostasis Model Assessment - Insulin Resistance (HOMA-R)
NCT00577824 (17) [back to overview]Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)
NCT00577824 (17) [back to overview]Change in Serum Insulin
NCT00577824 (17) [back to overview]7 Point Self-monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Profiles at Baseline and Week 24
NCT00577824 (17) [back to overview]Change in Waist Size
NCT00577824 (17) [back to overview]Change in C-peptide
NCT00577824 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c < 6.5%
NCT00577824 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c < 7.0%
NCT00577824 (17) [back to overview]Change in Triglycerides
NCT00577824 (17) [back to overview]Change in Total Cholesterol
NCT00577824 (17) [back to overview]Change in Waist-to-hip Ratio
NCT00603239 (11) [back to overview]Change in Impact of Weight on Quality of Life (IWQOL)-Lite Score
NCT00603239 (11) [back to overview]Change in Euroqol - 5 Domain Quality of Life (EQ-5D) Score
NCT00603239 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <= 7%
NCT00603239 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <= 6.5%
NCT00603239 (11) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Who Experienced an Episode of Minor Hypoglycemia
NCT00603239 (11) [back to overview]Change in Waist Circumference
NCT00603239 (11) [back to overview]Change in Insulin Sensitivity.
NCT00603239 (11) [back to overview]Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
NCT00603239 (11) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Serum Glucose (FSG)
NCT00603239 (11) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight
NCT00603239 (11) [back to overview]Change in Beta-cell Function
NCT00623545 (2) [back to overview]Weight Loss After Administration of Exenatide.
NCT00623545 (2) [back to overview]Change in Energy Intake Measured Before Treatment and at the End of Treatment.
NCT00635492 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c Concentration <7.0% at Month 24
NCT00635492 (21) [back to overview]Diet and Exercise Advice in Diabetes Management Associated With Treatment Choice at Baseline
NCT00635492 (21) [back to overview]Changes in HbA1c From Baseline to Month 24
NCT00635492 (21) [back to overview]Reasons for Discontinuation of Baseline Regimen
NCT00635492 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Hospitalized Between Baseline and 24 Months
NCT00635492 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Contacting Health Care Providers Between Baseline and 24 Months
NCT00635492 (21) [back to overview]Number of Contacts With Health Care Providers Between Baseline and 24 Months
NCT00635492 (21) [back to overview]Factors Associated With Treatment Change in Insulin Cohort
NCT00635492 (21) [back to overview]Factors Associated With Treatment Change in Exenatide BID Cohort
NCT00635492 (21) [back to overview]Estimates of Probability to Remain on Initial Injectable Treatment at 12 and 24 Months.
NCT00635492 (21) [back to overview]Changes in Weight From Baseline to Month 24
NCT00635492 (21) [back to overview]Disinhibited Eating Associated With Treatment Choice at Baseline
NCT00635492 (21) [back to overview]Frequent Blood Glucose Self Monitoring Associated With Treatment Choice at Baseline
NCT00635492 (21) [back to overview]Higher Body Mass Index (BMI) Associated With Treatment Choice at Baseline
NCT00635492 (21) [back to overview]Higher Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1) Associated With Treatment Choice at Baseline
NCT00635492 (21) [back to overview]Higher Random Glucose Associated With Treatment Choice at Baseline
NCT00635492 (21) [back to overview]Higher Value of Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Associated With Treatment Choice at Baseline
NCT00635492 (21) [back to overview]Incidence of Gastro Intestinal Symptoms Between Baseline and 24 Months
NCT00635492 (21) [back to overview]Incidence of Hypoglycemia Between Baseline and 24 Months
NCT00635492 (21) [back to overview]Older Age Associated With Treatment Choice at Baseline
NCT00635492 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c Concentration <6.5% at Month 24
NCT00637273 (12) [back to overview]Assessment on Event Rate of Treatment-emergent Hypoglycemic Events
NCT00637273 (12) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00637273 (12) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00637273 (12) [back to overview]Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00637273 (12) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00637273 (12) [back to overview]Change in Fasting High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00637273 (12) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00637273 (12) [back to overview]Ratio of Fasting Triglycerides at Week 26 to Baseline
NCT00637273 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Target of <7% at Week 26
NCT00637273 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Target of <=6.5% at Week 26
NCT00637273 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Target of <=6.0% at Week 26
NCT00637273 (12) [back to overview]Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00641056 (10) [back to overview]Change in Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00641056 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <=7.0% at Week 26
NCT00641056 (10) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Serum Glucose (FSG) From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00641056 (10) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00641056 (10) [back to overview]Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL) From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00641056 (10) [back to overview]Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00641056 (10) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight (BW) From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00641056 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <=6.5% at Week 26
NCT00641056 (10) [back to overview]Ratio of Triglycerides at Week 26 to Baseline
NCT00641056 (10) [back to overview]Assessment on Event Rate of Treatment-emergent Hypoglycemic Episodes
NCT00650546 (2) [back to overview]Change in NAS
NCT00650546 (2) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Improvement in Liver Histology After Treatment With Exenatide
NCT00658021 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving HbA1c Goals of < 7%, <= 6.5%, and < 6.5% Through Week 28
NCT00658021 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Discontinuing the Study Due to Failure to Maintain Glycemic Control Through Week 28
NCT00658021 (9) [back to overview]Adjusted Change From Baseline in Fasting Serum Insulin at Week 28
NCT00658021 (9) [back to overview]Adjusted Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 28
NCT00658021 (9) [back to overview]Adjusted Change From Baseline in Fasting Serum Glucose (FSG) at Week 28
NCT00658021 (9) [back to overview]Adjusted Change From Baseline in Glycated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 28
NCT00658021 (9) [back to overview]Adjusted Change From Baseline in Homeostasis Model Assessments - Beta-Cell Function (HOMA-B) and Insulin Sensitivity (HOMA-S) at Week 28
NCT00658021 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Post-Treatment Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) During Safety Follow-up Period
NCT00658021 (9) [back to overview]Adjusted Change From Baseline in Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at Week 28
NCT00667732 (2) [back to overview]The Percentage of Per Protocol Participants Randomized and Treated in Each Arm Who Had Lab-measured A1c <6.5% at 24 Weeks of Treatment
NCT00667732 (2) [back to overview]The Percentage of Intent to Treat Participants Randomized and Treated in Each Arm Who Had Lab-measured A1c <6.5% at 24 Weeks of Treatment
NCT00676338 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <=7% at Week 26
NCT00676338 (11) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00676338 (11) [back to overview]Assessment on Event Rate of Treatment-emergent Major Hypoglycemic Events
NCT00676338 (11) [back to overview]Assessment on Event Rate of Treatment-Emergent Minor Hypoglycemic Events
NCT00676338 (11) [back to overview]Ratio of Fasting Triglycerides at Week 26 to Baseline
NCT00676338 (11) [back to overview]Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 26.
NCT00676338 (11) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00676338 (11) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Total Cholesterol (TC) From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00676338 (11) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Serum Glucose (FSG) From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00676338 (11) [back to overview]Change in Fasting High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00676338 (11) [back to overview]Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 26.
NCT00679042 (5) [back to overview]Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
NCT00679042 (5) [back to overview]Reduction in Hypoglycemic Severity Measured by %Reduction in HYPO Score
NCT00679042 (5) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Reaching the Efficacy Goal
NCT00679042 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients Presenting With Insulin Independence at Day 365 Post First and Last Transplant
NCT00679042 (5) [back to overview]Hypoglycemic Episodes by HYPO Score
NCT00701935 (13) [back to overview]Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to 6 Months
NCT00701935 (13) [back to overview]Change in Weight From Baseline to 6 Months
NCT00701935 (13) [back to overview]Percentage Change in Abdominal Visceral Fat From Baseline to 6 Months
NCT00701935 (13) [back to overview]Percentage Change in Subcutaneous Abdominal Fat From Baseline to 6 Months
NCT00701935 (13) [back to overview]Percentage Change in Total Abdominal Fat From Baseline to 6 Months
NCT00701935 (13) [back to overview]Assessment of Event Rate of Treatment- Emergent Hypoglycemic Event
NCT00701935 (13) [back to overview]Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 6 Months
NCT00701935 (13) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline to 6 Months
NCT00701935 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <=7.0% at 6 Months
NCT00701935 (13) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c From Baseline to 6 Months
NCT00701935 (13) [back to overview]Change in High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol From Baseline to 6 Months
NCT00701935 (13) [back to overview]Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 6 Months
NCT00701935 (13) [back to overview]Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to 6 Months
NCT00707031 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than 7% at Week 24
NCT00707031 (9) [back to overview]Absolute Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 24
NCT00707031 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 24
NCT00707031 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24
NCT00707031 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Requiring Rescue Therapy During Main 24-Week Period
NCT00707031 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With at Least 5% Weight Loss From Baseline at Week 24
NCT00707031 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than or Equal to 6.5% at Week 24
NCT00707031 (9) [back to overview]Quality of Life: Change From Baseline in Patient's Satisfaction to Treatment (PAGI-QOL) at Week 24
NCT00707031 (9) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Symptomatic Hypoglycemia and Severe Symptomatic Hypoglycemia
NCT00729326 (19) [back to overview]Episodes of Hypoglycemia (Overall)
NCT00729326 (19) [back to overview]Episodes of Hypoglycemia (Week 4 to Week 8)
NCT00729326 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Experiencing Hypoglycemia (Week 4 to Week 8)
NCT00729326 (19) [back to overview]Change in Postprandial C-peptide AUC After the Morning Meal
NCT00729326 (19) [back to overview]Change in Postprandial C-peptide AUC Excursion After the Morning Meal
NCT00729326 (19) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Blood Glucose After the Morning Meal
NCT00729326 (19) [back to overview]Change in Postprandial Active GLP-1 AUC After the Morning Meal
NCT00729326 (19) [back to overview]Change in Postprandial Active GLP-1 AUC Excursion After the Monrning Meal
NCT00729326 (19) [back to overview]Change in Postprandial Glucagon Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) After the Morning Meal
NCT00729326 (19) [back to overview]Change in Postprandial Glucagon AUC Excursion After the Morning Meal
NCT00729326 (19) [back to overview]Change in Postprandial Insulin AUC After the Morning Meal
NCT00729326 (19) [back to overview]Change in Postprandial Insulin AUC Excursion After the Morning Meal
NCT00729326 (19) [back to overview]Change in Two-hour Postprandial Glucose After the Morning Meal
NCT00729326 (19) [back to overview]Change in Time-averaged Glucose During a 24 Hour Period
NCT00729326 (19) [back to overview]Change in Postprandial Triglyceride AUC Excursion After the Morning Meal
NCT00729326 (19) [back to overview]Change in Postprandial Triglyceride AUC After the Morning Meal
NCT00729326 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Experiencing Hypoglycemia (Baseline to Week 4)
NCT00729326 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Experiencing Hypoglycemia (Overall)
NCT00729326 (19) [back to overview]Episodes of Hypoglycemia (Baseline to Week 4)
NCT00736229 (4) [back to overview]Median Glucose Values From Steady State Through 48 Hours or Until Discharge.
NCT00736229 (4) [back to overview]Serious Adverse Events (Death, Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction, and Non-fatal Stroke Through 30 Days)
NCT00736229 (4) [back to overview]Time to Steady State
NCT00736229 (4) [back to overview]Rates of Hypoglycemia and Severe Hypoglycemia
NCT00753896 (11) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 52
NCT00753896 (11) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Serum Glucose From Baseline to Week 52
NCT00753896 (11) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 52
NCT00753896 (11) [back to overview]Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 52
NCT00753896 (11) [back to overview]Assessment of Event Rate of Treatment-Emergent Hypoglycemic Events
NCT00753896 (11) [back to overview]Change in Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 52
NCT00753896 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Experiencing Adverse Events
NCT00753896 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <=7% at Week 52
NCT00753896 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <=6.5% at Week 52
NCT00753896 (11) [back to overview]Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 52
NCT00753896 (11) [back to overview]Change in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) From Baseline to Week 52
NCT00765817 (17) [back to overview]Change in Triglycerides
NCT00765817 (17) [back to overview]Change in Total Cholesterol
NCT00765817 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Minor Hypoglycemia
NCT00765817 (17) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Serum Glucose
NCT00765817 (17) [back to overview]Change in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol
NCT00765817 (17) [back to overview]Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)
NCT00765817 (17) [back to overview]Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
NCT00765817 (17) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight
NCT00765817 (17) [back to overview]Change in Daily Insulin Dose
NCT00765817 (17) [back to overview]Change in 7-point Self-monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Profile
NCT00765817 (17) [back to overview]Change in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol
NCT00765817 (17) [back to overview]Change in Waist Circumference
NCT00765817 (17) [back to overview]Change in Daily Insulin Dose (on a Per Body Weight Basis)
NCT00765817 (17) [back to overview]Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
NCT00765817 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <=7%
NCT00765817 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <=6.5%
NCT00765817 (17) [back to overview]Minor Hypoglycemia Rate Per Year
NCT00775684 (5) [back to overview]Effect on Functional Beta-cell Mass as Determined by Change in ß-cell Secretory Capacity at 6 Months (μU/ml)
NCT00775684 (5) [back to overview]PG 50 (the Plasma Glucose Level at Which Half-maximal Insulin Secretion is Achieved During the Glucose-potentiated Arginine Test) at Baseline and 6 Months
NCT00775684 (5) [back to overview]Change in Acute Insulin Response to Arginine. (AIRarg)
NCT00775684 (5) [back to overview]Effect on Functional Beta-cell Mass as Determined by Change in ß-cell Secretory Capacity at 6 Months (pg/mL)
NCT00775684 (5) [back to overview]Insulin Sensitivity at Baseline and 6 Months
NCT00782418 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Insulin Concentration
NCT00782418 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Insulin Secretion Rate (ISR) Normalized to Ambient Plasma Glucose
NCT00782418 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in C-peptide Concentration
NCT00799435 (1) [back to overview]Change in Aortic Stiffness, as Measured by the Change in the Mean Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity
NCT00845182 (2) [back to overview]HbA1c
NCT00845182 (2) [back to overview]Effect of Pioglitazone, Exenatide and Combined Pioglitazone and Exenatide on Body Weight
NCT00845507 (2) [back to overview]Change in Weight From Baseline to Endpoint.
NCT00845507 (2) [back to overview]Change in Body Mass Index (BMI) From Baseline to Endpoint.
NCT00855439 (4) [back to overview]Confirmed Clinical Neuropathy (CCN)
NCT00855439 (4) [back to overview]Cardiac Autonomic Neuropathy (CAN)
NCT00855439 (4) [back to overview]Cardiac Autonomic Neuropathy
NCT00855439 (4) [back to overview]Intra-epidermal Nerve Fiber Density
NCT00856609 (3) [back to overview]Energy Intake
NCT00856609 (3) [back to overview]Body Weight
NCT00856609 (3) [back to overview]Twenty-four-hour Energy Expenditure
NCT00870194 (17) [back to overview]Incidence of Hypoglycemia (Overall)
NCT00870194 (17) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight (kg)
NCT00870194 (17) [back to overview]Change in FSG (mmol/L)
NCT00870194 (17) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c (Percent)
NCT00870194 (17) [back to overview]Change in HDL (mmol/L)
NCT00870194 (17) [back to overview]Change in LDL (mmol/L)
NCT00870194 (17) [back to overview]Change in Total Cholesterol (mmol/L)
NCT00870194 (17) [back to overview]Change in Triglycerides (mmol/L)
NCT00870194 (17) [back to overview]Change in Waist Circumference (cm)
NCT00870194 (17) [back to overview]Incidence of Confirmed Hypoglycemia(Overall)
NCT00870194 (17) [back to overview]Incidence of Nocturnal Hypoglycemia (Overall)
NCT00870194 (17) [back to overview]Incidence of Severe Hypoglycemia(Overall)
NCT00870194 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <=7.0%
NCT00870194 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <7.0%
NCT00870194 (17) [back to overview]SMBG (mmol/L)
NCT00870194 (17) [back to overview]Waist-to-Hip Ratio
NCT00870194 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <=6.5%
NCT00877890 (13) [back to overview]Ratio of Triglycerides at Week 24 to Baseline
NCT00877890 (13) [back to overview]Assessment on Event Rate of Treatment-emergent Minor Hypoglycemic Events
NCT00877890 (13) [back to overview]Change in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 24
NCT00877890 (13) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 24
NCT00877890 (13) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline to Week 24
NCT00877890 (13) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 24
NCT00877890 (13) [back to overview]Change in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 24
NCT00877890 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Target of <7%
NCT00877890 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Target of <=6.5%
NCT00877890 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Achieving Fasting Plasma Glucose Target of <=126 mg/dL
NCT00877890 (13) [back to overview]Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 24
NCT00877890 (13) [back to overview]Change in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) From Baseline to Week 24
NCT00877890 (13) [back to overview]Assessment on Event Rate of Treatment-emergent Major Hypoglycemic Events
NCT00882050 (1) [back to overview]The Primary Objective is to Determine the Ability of Intravenous Exenatide to: Maintain Intraoperative Euglycemia in Subjects With Initial Blood Glucose < 126 mg/dL in Surgical Subjects as Compared to Placebo,
NCT00886626 (1) [back to overview]Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)
NCT00894322 (19) [back to overview]Least Square Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) to Week 12 in Participants With Diabetes (Cohort 2) in the ITT Population
NCT00894322 (19) [back to overview]Average Exenatide Concentration (Cave) of 10 mg Exenatide (Cohort 1) in Healthy Participants in the Pharmacokinetic Evaluable Population
NCT00894322 (19) [back to overview]AUC (0 Hour to 168 Hour) for 10 mg Exenatide (Cohort 1) in Healthy Participants in the Pharmacokinetic Evaluable Population
NCT00894322 (19) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of 2 mg Exenatide (Cohort 2) in Participants With Diabetes in Pharmacokinetic Evaluable Population
NCT00894322 (19) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) for Single Dose of 10 mg Exenatide (Cohort 1) in Healthy Participants in the Pharmacokinetic Evaluable Population
NCT00894322 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Injection Site TEAEs, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths, and Withdrawals Due to AEs in Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 in Intent to Treat (ITT) Population
NCT00894322 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Values of Potential Clinical Importance in Cohorts 1 and 2 in ITT Population
NCT00894322 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving HbA1c Less Than Equal to (<=) 6.5% and Less Than (<) 7% at Week 12 in Participants With Diabetes (Cohort 2) in the ITT Population
NCT00894322 (19) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study in Sitting Diastolic and Systolic Blood Pressure in Cohorts 1 and 2 in ITT Population
NCT00894322 (19) [back to overview]Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for Single Dose of 10 mg Exenatide (Cohort 1) in Healthy Participants in the Pharmacokinetic Evaluable Population
NCT00894322 (19) [back to overview]Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for 2 mg Exenatide (Cohort 2) in Participants With Diabetes in the Pharmacokinetic Evaluable Population
NCT00894322 (19) [back to overview]Average Exenatide Concentration (Cave) of 2 mg Exenatide (Cohort 2) in Participants With Diabetes in the Pharmacokinetic Evaluable Population
NCT00894322 (19) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Single Dose of 10 mg Exenatide (Cohort 1) in Healthy Participants in the Pharmacokinetic Evaluable Population
NCT00894322 (19) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve (AUC) for 2 mg Exenatide (Cohort 2) in Participants With Diabetes in the Pharmacokinetic Evaluable Population
NCT00894322 (19) [back to overview]Antibody Titers for Participants With Treatment Emergent Positive Antibodies to Exenatide in Participants Who Received Exenatide in Cohorts 1 and 2
NCT00894322 (19) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study in Sitting Heart Rate in Cohorts 1 and 2 in ITT Population
NCT00894322 (19) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline at Week 12 in Fasting Plasma Glucose in Participants With Diabetes (Cohort 2) for the ITT Population
NCT00894322 (19) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline at Week 12 in Body Weight in Participants With Diabetes (Cohort 2) in the ITT Population
NCT00894322 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Concomitant Medications in Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 in ITT Population
NCT00917267 (10) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Serum Glucose (FSG) From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00917267 (10) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26.
NCT00917267 (10) [back to overview]Change in High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00917267 (10) [back to overview]Change in Total Cholesterol (TC) From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00917267 (10) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight (BW) From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00917267 (10) [back to overview]Ratio of Triglycerides (TG) at Week 26 to Baseline
NCT00917267 (10) [back to overview]Assessment of Event Rate of Treatment-emergent Hypoglycemic Events
NCT00917267 (10) [back to overview]Change in Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 26
NCT00917267 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c Targets <=7% at Week 26
NCT00917267 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c Targets <=6.5% at Week 26
NCT00935532 (11) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 26)
NCT00935532 (11) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Serum Glucose (FSG) From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 26)
NCT00935532 (11) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 26)
NCT00935532 (11) [back to overview]Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 26)
NCT00935532 (11) [back to overview]Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 26)
NCT00935532 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c<=6.5%
NCT00935532 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c<=7%
NCT00935532 (11) [back to overview]Ratio of Fasting Triglycerides at Endpoint (Week 26) to Baseline
NCT00935532 (11) [back to overview]Change in Blood Pressure From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 26)
NCT00935532 (11) [back to overview]Assessment on Event Rate of Treatment-emergent Major Hypoglycemic Events
NCT00935532 (11) [back to overview]Assessment on Event Rate of Treatment-emergent Minor Hypoglycemic Events
NCT00943917 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change in HbA1c (Per Protocol)
NCT00943917 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change in HbA1c (Per Protocol)
NCT00943917 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change in HbA1c (Per Protocol)
NCT00943917 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change in HbA1c (ITT)
NCT00943917 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change in HbA1c (ITT)
NCT00943917 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change in HbA1c (ITT)
NCT00960661 (13) [back to overview]Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) From Baseline to Week 30
NCT00960661 (13) [back to overview]Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Week 30
NCT00960661 (13) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 30.
NCT00960661 (13) [back to overview]Change in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) From Baseline to Week 30
NCT00960661 (13) [back to overview]Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 30
NCT00960661 (13) [back to overview]Major Hypoglycemia Rate Per Year
NCT00960661 (13) [back to overview]Minor Hypoglycemia Rate Per Year
NCT00960661 (13) [back to overview]Percent of Participants Achieving HbA1c ≤ 6.5%.
NCT00960661 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving HbA1C < 7.0%
NCT00960661 (13) [back to overview]Daily Insulin Glargine Dose at Baseline and at Week 30
NCT00960661 (13) [back to overview]Change in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) From Baseline to Week 30
NCT00960661 (13) [back to overview]Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) From Baseline to Week 30
NCT00960661 (13) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG) From Baseline to Week 30.
NCT01003184 (14) [back to overview]Changes in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 26
NCT01003184 (14) [back to overview]Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 26).
NCT01003184 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving ≤6.5% at Endpoint
NCT01003184 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Who Have Achieved HbA1c ≤7.4% With Weight Loss (≥1.0 kg) at Endpoint (Week 26)
NCT01003184 (14) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26
NCT01003184 (14) [back to overview]Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 26.
NCT01003184 (14) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Serum Glucose From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 26).
NCT01003184 (14) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26
NCT01003184 (14) [back to overview]Change in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 26).
NCT01003184 (14) [back to overview]Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 26).
NCT01003184 (14) [back to overview]Hypoglycemia Rate Per Year
NCT01003184 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving ≤7.0% at Endpoint
NCT01003184 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Concentration ≤7.0% With Weight Loss (≥1.0 kg) at Endpoint (Week 26)
NCT01003184 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c ≤7.4% at Endpoint
NCT01006889 (8) [back to overview]Change in Anthropometric Variables (BMI).
NCT01006889 (8) [back to overview]Lipid Profiles, Lipoprotein Analysis by NMR (LipoScience).
NCT01006889 (8) [back to overview]Insulin Secretion (Hyperglycemic Clamp)
NCT01006889 (8) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Glucose Infusion (M Value) During Hyperglycemic Clamp
NCT01006889 (8) [back to overview]Number of Severe Hypoglycemic (Glucose ≤40 mg/dL) Events.
NCT01006889 (8) [back to overview]Hepatic Steatosis
NCT01006889 (8) [back to overview]Change in Anthropometric Variables (Weight).
NCT01006889 (8) [back to overview]A1c
NCT01029886 (10) [back to overview]Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 26
NCT01029886 (10) [back to overview]Change in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 26
NCT01029886 (10) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26
NCT01029886 (10) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26
NCT01029886 (10) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Serum Glucose From Baseline to Week 26
NCT01029886 (10) [back to overview]Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Week 26
NCT01029886 (10) [back to overview]Assessment of Event Rate of Treatment-emergent Hypoglycemic Events
NCT01029886 (10) [back to overview]Ratio of Fasting Triglycerides at Week 26 to Baseline
NCT01029886 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <7.0% at Week 26
NCT01029886 (10) [back to overview]Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) From Baseline to Week 26
NCT01060059 (23) [back to overview]Changes in Diastolic Blood Pressure Between Baseline and Month 12
NCT01060059 (23) [back to overview]Changes in Fasting Blood Glucose From Baseline to Month 12
NCT01060059 (23) [back to overview]Changes in Fasting HDL Between Baseline and Month 12
NCT01060059 (23) [back to overview]Changes in Fasting Total Cholesterol Between Baseline and Month 12
NCT01060059 (23) [back to overview]Changes in Fasting Triglycerides Between Baseline and Month 12
NCT01060059 (23) [back to overview]Changes in HbA1c From Baseline to Month 12
NCT01060059 (23) [back to overview]Changes in Systolic Blood Pressure Between Baseline and Month 12
NCT01060059 (23) [back to overview]Changes in Weight From Baseline to Month 12
NCT01060059 (23) [back to overview]Factor of 1 Percent (%) Higher Baseline HbA1c Associated With Treatment Choice at Baseline
NCT01060059 (23) [back to overview]Factor of Greater Height Associated With Treatment Choice at Baseline
NCT01060059 (23) [back to overview]Factor of Higher Body Mass Index (BMI) Associated With Treatment Choice at Baseline
NCT01060059 (23) [back to overview]Factor of Longer Duration of Diabetes Associated With Treatment Choice at Baseline
NCT01060059 (23) [back to overview]Factor of Older Age Associated With Treatment Choice at Baseline
NCT01060059 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving a Weight Decrease >=3% Between Baseline and Month 12
NCT01060059 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving a Weight Decrease >=5% Between Baseline and Month 12
NCT01060059 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c Concentration <=7.0% at Month 12
NCT01060059 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c Concentration <6.5% at Month 12
NCT01060059 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Who Achieved Glycemic Target of HbA1c ≤ 7.0% With Minimal Weight Gain (≤ 1 Kg) at Month 12.
NCT01060059 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With HbA1c Reduction From Baseline >= 1.0% at Month 12
NCT01060059 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Hypoglycemia Episodes Between Baseline and Month 12
NCT01060059 (23) [back to overview]Factors of Gender, Baseline Presence of Medical Conditions, and Previous Gastrointestinal Symptoms Associated With Treatment Choice at Baseline
NCT01060059 (23) [back to overview]Factors of Higher Creatinine, Higher Fasting High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, Higher Fasting Cholesterol, and Higher Fasting Triglycerides Which Were Associated With Treatment Choice at Baseline
NCT01060059 (23) [back to overview]Changes in Fasting LDL Between Baseline and Month 12
NCT01061775 (4) [back to overview]BMI Change
NCT01061775 (4) [back to overview]Waist to Height Ratio (WHtR)
NCT01061775 (4) [back to overview]Childhood Eating Behavior Questionnaire (CEBQ)
NCT01061775 (4) [back to overview]Calorie Intake Based on 3-day Diet Records
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Attaining Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Less Than 7% and Less Than or Equal to 6.5% at 26 Weeks
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks on Pancreatic Enzymes
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks on Electrocardiogram Parameters, Fridericia Corrected QT (QTcF) Interval and PR Interval
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks on Blood Pressure
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks in Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta-cell Function (HOMA2-%B) and Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Sensitivity (HOMA2-%S)
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks in the EuroQol 5
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Curve (AUC) for LY2189265
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events at 52 Weeks
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events at 26 Weeks
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Number of Participants With LY2189265 Antibodies at 26 Weeks
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adjudicated Pancreatitis at 52 Weeks
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adjudicated Pancreatitis at 26 Weeks
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Number of Participants Requiring Rescue Therapy Due to Hyperglycemia at 52 Weeks
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Number of Participants Requiring Rescue Therapy Due to Hyperglycemia at 26 Weeks
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change in Baseline to 52 Weeks on Pulse Rate
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change in Baseline to 26 Weeks on Pulse Rate
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks on the Impact of Weight on Self-Perception
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks in the EuroQol 5
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks on Body Mass Index (BMI)
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks in the Impact of Weight on Activities of Daily Living
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks in Hematological and Biochemical Lab Values
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks for Daily Mean Blood Glucose Values From the 8-point Self-monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Profiles
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks for Body Weight
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks Endpoint in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks on the Impact of Weight on Self-Perception
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks on Serum Calcitonin
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks on Body Mass Index (BMI)
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks in the Impact of Weight on Activities of Daily Living
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks in the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire Status (DTSQs) Version
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Number of Participants With LY2189265 Antibodies at 52 Weeks and 4 Weeks After Last Dose of Study Drug
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks in N Terminal Pro Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP)
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks in Hematological and Biochemical Lab Values
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks for Daily Mean Blood Glucose Values From the 8-point Self-monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Profiles
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks for Body Weight
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks Endpoint in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Rate of Self-reported Hypoglycemic Events at 52 Weeks
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Rate of Self-reported Hypoglycemic Events at 26 Weeks
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Attaining Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Less Than 7% and Less Than or Equal to 6.5% at 52 Weeks
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks on Serum Calcitonin
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Number of Self-reported Hypoglycemic Events at 52 Weeks
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Number of Self-reported Hypoglycemic Events at 26 Weeks
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks in the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire Status (DTSQs) and Change (DTSQc) Versions
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adjudicated Cardiovascular Events at 52 Weeks
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks on Pancreatic Enzymes
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks on Electrocardiogram Parameters, Fridericia Corrected QT (QTcF) Interval and PR Interval
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks on Blood Pressure
NCT01064687 (47) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks in Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta-cell Function (HOMA2-%B) and Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Sensitivity (HOMA2-%S)
NCT01077323 (4) [back to overview]"Incidence Rates Per 100,000 Person-Years of Likely Acute Pancreatitis (Among Recent Use Period) - Time on Drug Analysis"
NCT01077323 (4) [back to overview]"Incidence Rates Per 100,000 Person-Years of Likely Acute Pancreatitis (During Current Use Period) - Time on Drug Analysis"
NCT01077323 (4) [back to overview]"Incidence Rates Per 100,000 Person-Years of Likely Acute Pancreatitis (During Past Use Period) - Time on Drug Analysis"
NCT01077323 (4) [back to overview]Incidence Rates Per 100,000 Person-Years of Likely Acute Pancreatitis Among Initiators of Exenatide, Diabetics Initiating Other Antidiabetic Drugs, and the Non-diabetes Cohort - Intent to Treat Analysis
NCT01089569 (7) [back to overview]HbA1c Change
NCT01089569 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Weight Changes
NCT01089569 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Incidence of Hypoglycemia (Frequency)
NCT01089569 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Incidence of Hypoglycemia (Degree)
NCT01089569 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glucose Stability (Absolute Hourly Rate of Change in Median Curve)
NCT01089569 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glucose Exposure (Area Under the Diurnal Median Curve or AUC)
NCT01089569 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in CGM Glucose Variability
NCT01104701 (12) [back to overview]Participants Negative or Positive for Anti-exenatide Antibodies - ITT Population
NCT01104701 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), and AEs Leading to Discontinuation - ITT Population
NCT01104701 (12) [back to overview]Number of Chemistry Laboratory Values of Potential Clinical Importance Observed During Treatment Period - ITT Population
NCT01104701 (12) [back to overview]Number of Hematology Laboratory Values of Potential Clinical Importance Observed During Treatment Period - ITT Population
NCT01104701 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving HbA1c Target Values at Week 20 - Evaluable Population
NCT01104701 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Week 20 - Intent to Treat (ITT) Population
NCT01104701 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Injection Site Reaction Treatment Emergent Adverse Events - ITT Population
NCT01104701 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Diastolic and Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 20 - Intent to Treat (ITT) Population
NCT01104701 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 20 - Evaluable Population
NCT01104701 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change in Fasting Glucose From Baseline to Week 20 - Evaluable Population
NCT01104701 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change in HbA1c From Baseline to End of Treatment (Week 20) - Evaluable Population
NCT01104701 (12) [back to overview]Time Weighted Average Concentration and Peak to Trough of Exenatide From Week 12 Through Week 16 - Pharmacokinetic Evaluable - Steady State Population
NCT01136798 (5) [back to overview]Severity of Obstructive Sleep Apnea
NCT01136798 (5) [back to overview]Sleep Efficiency During Polysomnographic Recording
NCT01136798 (5) [back to overview]Mean 24-h Blood Glucose Levels
NCT01136798 (5) [back to overview]Minutes of Wake After Sleep Onset During Sleep Recording
NCT01136798 (5) [back to overview]Non-REM Slow Wave Sleep
NCT01147627 (1) [back to overview]the Comparison Between Treatment Groups of the Changes From Baseline in HbA1c at 48 Weeks
NCT01154933 (4) [back to overview]HbA1c
NCT01154933 (4) [back to overview]Fasting Insulin
NCT01154933 (4) [back to overview]Weight
NCT01154933 (4) [back to overview]Intranuclear NFκB Binding Activity
NCT01181986 (3) [back to overview]Reactive Hyperemia Index (RHI)
NCT01181986 (3) [back to overview]Plasma Triglycerides
NCT01181986 (3) [back to overview]Plasma Glucose
NCT01237197 (1) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index at 3-months
NCT01255163 (9) [back to overview]Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)
NCT01255163 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Incidence of Nausea
NCT01255163 (9) [back to overview]Cerebrospinal Fluid Amyloid-beta 42 (CSF Abeta42)
NCT01255163 (9) [back to overview]Body Mass Index (BMI)
NCT01255163 (9) [back to overview]Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Total Tau
NCT01255163 (9) [back to overview]Cerebrospinal Fluid phospho181-tau (CSF p181-tau)
NCT01255163 (9) [back to overview]Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Global Score
NCT01255163 (9) [back to overview]Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog70)
NCT01255163 (9) [back to overview]Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Sum of Boxes
NCT01269047 (2) [back to overview]Post-prandial Blood Glucose Concentration in Both Pramlintide and Exenatide Treated Groups in Acute and Chronic Setting, Compared to Insulin Monotherapy in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.
NCT01269047 (2) [back to overview]Difference in HbA1C Between the Treatment and the Control Groups
NCT01297062 (9) [back to overview]Assay Sensitivity of Moxifloxacin at 1200h (3 Hour Post-administration of Moxifloxacin) on Day 2
NCT01297062 (9) [back to overview]Plasma Exenatide Concentrations at Steady State on Day 1, 2 and 3
NCT01297062 (9) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With QTcP Interval >450msec at Any Timepoint on Any Day in Exenatide and Placebo
NCT01297062 (9) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Increase of QTcP Interval From Baseline >30msec at Any Timepoint on Any Day in Exenatide and Placebo
NCT01297062 (9) [back to overview]Comparison of LS Mean Changes From Baseline in QTcP Intervals Between Exenatide and Placebo on Day 3 Averaged Over 1300h, 1400h, 1500h (Target Steady State Exenatide Concentration of 500 pg/mL)
NCT01297062 (9) [back to overview]Comparison of LS Mean Changes From Baseline in QTcP Intervals Between Exenatide and Placebo on Day 2 Averaged Over 1300h, 1400h, 1500h (Target Steady State Exenatide Concentration of 300 pg/mL)
NCT01297062 (9) [back to overview]Comparison of Least Squares (LS) Mean Changes From Baseline in Population-based Corrected QT Intervals (QTcP) Between Exenatide and Placebo on Day 1 Averaged Over 1300h, 1400h, 1500h (Target Steady State Exenatide Concentration of 200 pg/mL)
NCT01297062 (9) [back to overview]Assay Sensitivity of Moxifloxacin at 1100h (2 Hour Post-administration of Moxifloxacin) on Day 2
NCT01297062 (9) [back to overview]Assay Sensitivity of Moxifloxacin at 1000h (1 Hour Post-administration of Moxifloxacin) on Day 2
NCT01364584 (14) [back to overview]Echocardiographic Measures - Longitudinal Strain
NCT01364584 (14) [back to overview]Echocardiographic Measures - Lateral E'
NCT01364584 (14) [back to overview]Echocardiographic Measures - Circumferential Strain
NCT01364584 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Arterial Stiffness
NCT01364584 (14) [back to overview]Echocardiographic Measures - Mitral Valve Deceleration Time
NCT01364584 (14) [back to overview]Echocardiographic Measures - Septal E:E'
NCT01364584 (14) [back to overview]Echocardiographic Measures - Mitral Valve E Wave Velocity
NCT01364584 (14) [back to overview]Oxygen Uptake Kinetics Steady State Tau
NCT01364584 (14) [back to overview]Peak Oxygen Consumption (VO2 Peak)
NCT01364584 (14) [back to overview]Echocardiographic Measures - Mitral Valve E:A Wave Velocity
NCT01364584 (14) [back to overview]Echocardiographic Measures - Septal E'
NCT01364584 (14) [back to overview]Echocardiographic Measures - Lateral E:E'
NCT01364584 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Peak Dilation of Brachial Artery Diameter
NCT01364584 (14) [back to overview]Echocardiographic Measures - Stroke Volume
NCT01381926 (3) [back to overview]Determine Changes in Bone Resorption Markers During the Treatment With a GLP-1 Receptor Agonist (Exenatide) Compared to Placebo in Patients With T2DM.
NCT01381926 (3) [back to overview]Determine Changes in Bone Turnover Markers by Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase 5b (TRACP5b) During the Treatment With a GLP-1 Receptor Agonist (Exenatide) Compared to Placebo in Patients With T2DM.
NCT01381926 (3) [back to overview]Determine Changes in Bone Turnover Markers by Serum N-Telo Peptide During the Treatment With a GLP-1 Receptor Agonist (Exenatide) Compared to Placebo in Patients With T2DM.
NCT01432405 (2) [back to overview]Plasma Adipocytokines
NCT01432405 (2) [back to overview]Hepatic Fat
NCT01444898 (9) [back to overview]Change in Weight
NCT01444898 (9) [back to overview]Appetite Scores
NCT01444898 (9) [back to overview]% Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)
NCT01444898 (9) [back to overview]Change in Acy Ghr
NCT01444898 (9) [back to overview]Change in Insulin Levels
NCT01444898 (9) [back to overview]Change in Leptin
NCT01444898 (9) [back to overview]Change in Pancreatic Peptide (PP)
NCT01444898 (9) [back to overview]Change in BMI Z-Score
NCT01444898 (9) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c (%)
NCT01484873 (5) [back to overview]Resting Energy Expenditure (Kcals Per Day)
NCT01484873 (5) [back to overview]Insulin Secretion (Area Under the Curve)
NCT01484873 (5) [back to overview]Gastric Emptying Rate (13C-octanoic Acid Isotope Excretion Half Life)
NCT01484873 (5) [back to overview]Body Weight (kg)
NCT01484873 (5) [back to overview]Visual Analogue Scales for Post-meal Satiety
NCT01524705 (4) [back to overview]HbA1C Levels
NCT01524705 (4) [back to overview]Weight Change During Trial
NCT01524705 (4) [back to overview]Coefficient of Variation at 26 Weeks Minus Coefficient of Variation at Baseline
NCT01524705 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hypoglycemia
NCT01554618 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)
NCT01554618 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HbA1c to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)
NCT01554618 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic) to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)
NCT01554618 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HOMA-B and HOMA-S to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)
NCT01554618 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Lipids Profiles to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)
NCT01554618 (24) [back to overview]Plasma Exenatide Concentrations to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)
NCT01554618 (24) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Positive for Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Exenatide up to Week 24
NCT01554618 (24) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Reporting AEs of Injection Site Reactions up to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)
NCT01554618 (24) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Reporting AEs of Injection Site Reactions up to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)
NCT01554618 (24) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With On-Treatment Adverse Events (AEs) up to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)
NCT01554618 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Homeostasis Model Assessments - Beta-Cell Function (HOMA-B) and Insulin Sensitivity (HOMA-S) to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)
NCT01554618 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Lipid Profiles to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)
NCT01554618 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Weight to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)
NCT01554618 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Weight to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)
NCT01554618 (24) [back to overview]Plasma Exenatide Concentrations to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)
NCT01554618 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)
NCT01554618 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)
NCT01554618 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)
NCT01554618 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Concentration to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)
NCT01554618 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in FPG Concentration to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)
NCT01554618 (24) [back to overview]Number of Patients Needing Rescue Medication Due to Failure to Maintain Glycemic Control up to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)
NCT01554618 (24) [back to overview]Number of Patients Needing Rescue Medication Due to Failure to Maintain Glycemic Control up to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)
NCT01554618 (24) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving HbA1c Goals of < 6.5%, ≤ 6.5%, and < 7.0% to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)
NCT01554618 (24) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c Goals of < 6.5%, ≤ 6.5%, and < 7.0% at Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)
NCT01588418 (1) [back to overview]Effect of Exenatide on Brain (Total Gray Matter) Glucose Metabolism
NCT01590433 (1) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight
NCT01652716 (5) [back to overview]Change in 2-hour Postprandial Glucose Concentrations From Baseline to Week 16
NCT01652716 (5) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight (kg) From Baseline to Week 28
NCT01652716 (5) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose Concentrations From Baseline to Week 28
NCT01652716 (5) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c (Glycosylated Hemoglobin) From Baseline to Week 28
NCT01652716 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c <7% at Week 28
NCT01652729 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c <7% at Week 28
NCT01652729 (5) [back to overview]Change in 2-hour Postprandial Glucose Concentrations From Baseline to Week 16 (Visit 8)
NCT01652729 (5) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight (kg) From Baseline to Week 28
NCT01652729 (5) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose Concentrations From Baseline to Week 28
NCT01652729 (5) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c (Glycosylated Hemoglobin) From Baseline to Week 28
NCT01664624 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Postprandial AUC(0-8) of Insulin
NCT01664624 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Day 11 in 24-hour Average Plasma Glucose
NCT01664624 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Day 11 in AUC(0-8) of Appetite Sensation
NCT01664624 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in AUC(0-8) of Postprandial Plasma Glucose
NCT01664624 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Postprandial Area Under the Curve From Time 0 to 8 Hours (AUC[0-8]) for Active Glucagon-like Peptide-1
NCT01664624 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Postprandial AUC(0-8) of C-peptide
NCT01676116 (9) [back to overview]Responders Achieving Pre-defined Target: HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol)
NCT01676116 (9) [back to overview]Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) From Baseline (Randomisation, Visit 2)
NCT01676116 (9) [back to overview]Number of Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT01676116 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) Based on the Treatment Related Impact Measure - Diabetes (TRIM-D)
NCT01676116 (9) [back to overview]Responders Achieving Pre-defined Target: HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol)
NCT01676116 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) Based on Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ).
NCT01676116 (9) [back to overview]Number of Severe or Minor Hypoglycaemic Episodes
NCT01676116 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Weight
NCT01676116 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
NCT01791465 (21) [back to overview]Body Mass Index at Baseline and 16 Weeks
NCT01791465 (21) [back to overview]Body Weight at Baseline and 16 Weeks
NCT01791465 (21) [back to overview]Peripheral Endothelial Tonography, as Measured by the Non-invasive EndoPAT System Using the LnRHI (Natural Log of Reactive Hyperemia Index), at Baseline and 16 Weeks
NCT01791465 (21) [back to overview]Serum Adipokine Leptin Levels at Baseline and 16 Weeks
NCT01791465 (21) [back to overview]Serum Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Levels at Baseline and 16 Weeks
NCT01791465 (21) [back to overview]Serum HDL Cholesterol Levels at Baseline and 16 Weeks
NCT01791465 (21) [back to overview]Serum Highly-sensitive C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels at Baseline and 16 Weeks
NCT01791465 (21) [back to overview]Serum Interleukin 6 (IL-6) at Levels at Baseline and 16 Weeks
NCT01791465 (21) [back to overview]Oral Glucose Insulin Sensitivity (OGIS) at Baseline and 16 Weeks
NCT01791465 (21) [back to overview]Serum Total Cholesterol Levels at Baseline and 16 Weeks
NCT01791465 (21) [back to overview]Waist Circumference at Baseline and 16 Weeks
NCT01791465 (21) [back to overview]Waist to Hip Ratio at Baseline and 16 Weeks
NCT01791465 (21) [back to overview]Hip Circumference at Baseline and 16 Weeks
NCT01791465 (21) [back to overview]Serum Triglycerides Levels at Baseline and 16 Weeks
NCT01791465 (21) [back to overview]Serum Macrophage Chemotactic Protein-1 (MCP-1) Levels at Baseline and 16 Weeks
NCT01791465 (21) [back to overview]Serum Macrophage Inflammatory Protein 1 Alpha (MIP-1 Alpha) Levels at Baseline and 16 Weeks
NCT01791465 (21) [back to overview]Serum LDL Cholesterol Levels at Baseline and 16 Weeks
NCT01791465 (21) [back to overview]Serum Soluble CD14 Levels at Baseline and 16 Weeks
NCT01791465 (21) [back to overview]Serum Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF-α) Levels at Baseline and 16 Weeks
NCT01791465 (21) [back to overview]Serum TNF-a Receptor 1 Levels at Baseline and 16 Weeks
NCT01791465 (21) [back to overview]Serum TNF-a Receptor 2 Levels at Baseline and 16 Weeks
NCT01798264 (4) [back to overview]To Characterize the Pharmacokinetic Profile of ITCA 650 in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT01798264 (4) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Study Drug-Related Adverse Events
NCT01798264 (4) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) 4 Weeks From Baseline
NCT01798264 (4) [back to overview]Change in Weight From Baseline to 4 Weeks
NCT01885208 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Weight
NCT01885208 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
NCT01885208 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)
NCT01885208 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Questionnaire Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire Status (DTSQs)
NCT01885208 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure
NCT01928329 (4) [back to overview]Major Hypoglycemic Event Rate Off Drug
NCT01928329 (4) [back to overview]Major Hypoglycemic Event Rate On Drug
NCT01928329 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HbA1c Levels
NCT01928329 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HbA1c Levels
NCT01951651 (4) [back to overview]Myocardial Fat Content
NCT01951651 (4) [back to overview]Monocyte Inflammatory Protein Nuclear Factor Kappa-B (NFkappaB) (%)
NCT01951651 (4) [back to overview]Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)(%).
NCT01951651 (4) [back to overview]Hepatic Fat Content
NCT02020616 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Bone Metabolism at 12-Week Endpoint (Beta-Crosslaps and Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide [P1NP])
NCT02020616 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Weight at 12-Week Endpoint
NCT02020616 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at 12-Week Endpoint
NCT02020616 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants That Require Rescue Therapy
NCT02020616 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies to LY3053102
NCT02020616 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia
NCT02020616 (12) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve During One Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUC [τ,ss]) of LY3053102
NCT02020616 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 7-Point Blood Glucose Profile at 12-Week Endpoint
NCT02020616 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Bone Metabolism at 12-Week Endpoint (Osteocalcin and Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase [Bone-Specific ALP])
NCT02020616 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density Markers at 12-Week Endpoint
NCT02020616 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Lipids at 12-Week Endpoint
NCT02020616 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving HbA1c <7.0% or HbA1c ≤6.5% at 12-Week Endpoint
NCT02058940 (14) [back to overview]Median Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay
NCT02058940 (14) [back to overview]Median Insulin Use
NCT02058940 (14) [back to overview]Median Hospital Length of Stay
NCT02058940 (14) [back to overview]Median Glucose Concentration During Exenatide Infusion
NCT02058940 (14) [back to overview]Glycemic Variability
NCT02058940 (14) [back to overview]Correlation of Exenatide Concentrations With Creatinine Clearance
NCT02058940 (14) [back to overview]Median Time to Reach Glucose Measurements Within Goal Range (110-180 mg/dL)
NCT02058940 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Critically Ill Patients With Acute Brain Injury Achieving Pre-specified Feasibility Criteria
NCT02058940 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With >1 Episode of Hypotensive Episode (SBP<100 mmHg)
NCT02058940 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Hypotensive Episodes (SBP<100 mmHg)
NCT02058940 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With >1 Episode of Hypoglycemia (<80 mg/dL)
NCT02058940 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Requiring Rescue Insulin Infusion Protocol
NCT02058940 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Hypoglycemic Episodes (<80 mg/dL)
NCT02058940 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Glucose Measurements Within Goal Range
NCT02072096 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)
NCT02072096 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)
NCT02072096 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline of Urinary Albumin to Creatinine Ratio
NCT02072096 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving and Maintaining Individualized Glycated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Targets Without Clinically Significant Hypoglycemia
NCT02072096 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Total Hypoglycemia and Other Categories of Hypoglycemia
NCT02072096 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Requiring Alternative Treatment Due to Glycemic Failure of First Line Injectable Therapy
NCT02104739 (13) [back to overview]Triglycerides
NCT02104739 (13) [back to overview]Triglycerides
NCT02104739 (13) [back to overview]Triglycerides
NCT02104739 (13) [back to overview]Triglycerides
NCT02104739 (13) [back to overview]Free Fatty Acids
NCT02104739 (13) [back to overview]Free Fatty Acids
NCT02104739 (13) [back to overview]Free Fatty Acids
NCT02104739 (13) [back to overview]Free Fatty Acids
NCT02104739 (13) [back to overview]Monocyte NfkB Levels as Detected by Western Blotting
NCT02104739 (13) [back to overview]Monocyte NfkB Levels as Detected by Western Blotting
NCT02104739 (13) [back to overview]Peak Forearm Blood Flow
NCT02104739 (13) [back to overview]Peak Forearm Blood Flow
NCT02104739 (13) [back to overview]Peak Forearm Blood Flow
NCT02119819 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glucagon Levels
NCT02119819 (15) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight
NCT02119819 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Fibroblast Growth Factor 21
NCT02119819 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Lipids
NCT02119819 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Developing Anti-Drug Antibodies to LY2944876
NCT02119819 (15) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Curve (AUC) of LY2944876
NCT02119819 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Requiring Rescue Therapy
NCT02119819 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 24
NCT02119819 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Insulin Levels
NCT02119819 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose
NCT02119819 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 12
NCT02119819 (15) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of LY2944876
NCT02119819 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Beta-Hydroxy Butyrate Levels
NCT02119819 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Adiponectin Levels
NCT02119819 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 7-point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Values
NCT02160990 (7) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Volume
NCT02160990 (7) [back to overview]Aggregate Satiation Symptom Score
NCT02160990 (7) [back to overview]Satiation Expressed as Volume to Fullness
NCT02160990 (7) [back to overview]Gastric Emptying Half-time (T 1/2) of Solids
NCT02160990 (7) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight
NCT02160990 (7) [back to overview]Buffet Meal Intake (kcal)
NCT02160990 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Gastric Contents Emptied at 1 Hour
NCT02229383 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving HbA1c <7.0% at Week 28, No Weight Gain at Week 28, and No Major Hypoglycemia Over 28 Weeks
NCT02229383 (7) [back to overview]Change in Seated Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 28
NCT02229383 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving HbA1c <7.0% at Week 28
NCT02229383 (7) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 28
NCT02229383 (7) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 28
NCT02229383 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 28 in Daily Insulin Dose
NCT02229383 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 28 in 2-hour Postprandial Glucose After a Standard Meal Tolerance Test (MTT)
NCT02251431 (13) [back to overview]L-FABP
NCT02251431 (13) [back to overview]ST2
NCT02251431 (13) [back to overview]NGAL
NCT02251431 (13) [back to overview]Cystatin-C
NCT02251431 (13) [back to overview]Pi GST
NCT02251431 (13) [back to overview]Troponin I
NCT02251431 (13) [back to overview]ACR
NCT02251431 (13) [back to overview]Alpha GST
NCT02251431 (13) [back to overview]BNP
NCT02251431 (13) [back to overview]NAG
NCT02251431 (13) [back to overview]Galectin-3
NCT02251431 (13) [back to overview]IL-18
NCT02251431 (13) [back to overview]KIM-1
NCT02288273 (7) [back to overview]Average of Change in 24-hour Mean Weighted Glucose From Baseline to Week 4 and Baseline to Week 10
NCT02288273 (7) [back to overview]Change in 24-hour Mean Weighted Glucose Between Day 1 of Week 10 (Day 64/65) and Day 6 of Week 10 (Day 69/70) Within Each EQW-treated Patient
NCT02288273 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Day1) to Day 70 and Day 22 in FPG
NCT02288273 (7) [back to overview]Average of Change in 24-hour Mean Weighted Glucose From Baseline to Week 4 and Baseline to Week 10
NCT02288273 (7) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Day 22 and Baseline to Day 70
NCT02288273 (7) [back to overview]Change in 24-hour Mean Weighted Glucose
NCT02288273 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 64 and Day 22 in 2- Hour Mean Weighted PPG (After the Breakfast Meal)
NCT02417142 (2) [back to overview]Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Composite T-score
NCT02417142 (2) [back to overview]Negative Symptoms as Measured by the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Score
NCT02455076 (30) [back to overview]Number of Hospital Readmissions
NCT02455076 (30) [back to overview]Number of Acute Kidney Injury Events
NCT02455076 (30) [back to overview]Mean Premeal Blood Glucose Levels Inpatient
NCT02455076 (30) [back to overview]Mean Fasting Blood Glucose Levels Inpatient
NCT02455076 (30) [back to overview]Mean Daily Blood Glucose Concentration Inpatient
NCT02455076 (30) [back to overview]Mean Fasting Blood Glucose Levels During Outpatient Period
NCT02455076 (30) [back to overview]Mean Daily Blood Glucose Concentration During Outpatient Period
NCT02455076 (30) [back to overview]Incidence of the Need for ICU Care Inpatient
NCT02455076 (30) [back to overview]Incidence of Hypoglycemic Events Inpatient
NCT02455076 (30) [back to overview]Incidence of Hyperglycemic Events Inpatient
NCT02455076 (30) [back to overview]Incidence of Hospital Readmissions
NCT02455076 (30) [back to overview]Total Daily Dose of Insulin Inpatient
NCT02455076 (30) [back to overview]Number of Severe Gastrointestinal Adverse Events
NCT02455076 (30) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Severe Hypoglycemic Events Inpatient
NCT02455076 (30) [back to overview]Incidence of Gastrointestinal Adverse Events Inpatient
NCT02455076 (30) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Severe Hypoglycemic Events
NCT02455076 (30) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Had Emergency Room Visits
NCT02455076 (30) [back to overview]The Number of Patients With Hypoglycemia Outpatient
NCT02455076 (30) [back to overview]Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury Inpatient
NCT02455076 (30) [back to overview]Hospital Mortality
NCT02455076 (30) [back to overview]Efficacy, Measured by HbA1c Levels and no Weight Gain
NCT02455076 (30) [back to overview]Efficacy, Measured by HbA1c Levels and no Hypoglycemia
NCT02455076 (30) [back to overview]Change in Systolic Blood Pressure
NCT02455076 (30) [back to overview]Change in Heart Rate
NCT02455076 (30) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c Concentration Inpatient
NCT02455076 (30) [back to overview]Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure
NCT02455076 (30) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight
NCT02455076 (30) [back to overview]Change in Body Mass Index
NCT02455076 (30) [back to overview]Average Number of Days of Hospital Stay
NCT02455076 (30) [back to overview]Hospital Complications
NCT02496611 (1) [back to overview]Body Mass Index
NCT02533453 (6) [back to overview]Change in Vital Sign
NCT02533453 (6) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c
NCT02533453 (6) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Plasma Gloucose
NCT02533453 (6) [back to overview]Change in Body Weight
NCT02533453 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events(AEs) and Serious Adverse Event(SAEs)
NCT02533453 (6) [back to overview]"Evaluation of Subjective Improvement of Main Indication"
NCT02635386 (23) [back to overview]Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)
NCT02635386 (23) [back to overview]Total Body Fat (%) by DEXA
NCT02635386 (23) [back to overview]Total Cholesterol Levels
NCT02635386 (23) [back to overview]Total Fat Mass (kg) Evaluated by DEXA
NCT02635386 (23) [back to overview]Total Testosterone Concentrations
NCT02635386 (23) [back to overview]Triglyceride (TRG) Levels
NCT02635386 (23) [back to overview]Trunk/Leg Fat Ratio by DEXA
NCT02635386 (23) [back to overview]Waist-to-Height Ratio (WHtR)
NCT02635386 (23) [back to overview]Waist-to-Hip Ratio (WHR)
NCT02635386 (23) [back to overview]Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate (DHEA-S) Levels
NCT02635386 (23) [back to overview]Absolute Body Weight
NCT02635386 (23) [back to overview]Android-Gynoid Ratio (AGR) as Determined by DEXA
NCT02635386 (23) [back to overview]Body Mass Index (BMI)
NCT02635386 (23) [back to overview]Central Adiposity (Waist Circumference)
NCT02635386 (23) [back to overview]Change in Percent Body Weight
NCT02635386 (23) [back to overview]Corrected First Phase Insulin Secretion (IGI/HOMA-IR)
NCT02635386 (23) [back to overview]Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
NCT02635386 (23) [back to overview]Fasting Blood Glucose
NCT02635386 (23) [back to overview]Fasting Insulin Sensitivity (HOMA-IR)
NCT02635386 (23) [back to overview]Free Androgen Index (FAI)
NCT02635386 (23) [back to overview]Matsuda Sensitivity Index Derived From the OGTT(SI OGTT)
NCT02635386 (23) [back to overview]OGTT Mean Blood Glucose (MBG)
NCT02635386 (23) [back to overview]Oral Disposition (Insulin Sensitivity-insulin Secretion) Index
NCT02664441 (11) [back to overview]Changes of Energy Intake Assessed by Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recall (ASA24-Kids)
NCT02664441 (11) [back to overview]Changes in HDL Cholesterol and Triglycerides Assessed by Fasting Lipids
NCT02664441 (11) [back to overview]Changes in Fat and Total Calorie Intake Assessed by Free Buffet Meal Analysis.
NCT02664441 (11) [back to overview]Percent Change of Body Mass Index (BMI) as Calculated by the Formula: Body Weight in kg Divided by Height in Meters².
NCT02664441 (11) [back to overview]Changes of Insulin Resistance Assessed by Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)
NCT02664441 (11) [back to overview]Changes of Energy Expenditure Assessed by Doubly Labeled Water Analysis
NCT02664441 (11) [back to overview]Changes of Circulating Leptin Levels
NCT02664441 (11) [back to overview]Changes in Inflammation Assessed by C-reactive Protein (CRP)
NCT02664441 (11) [back to overview]Changes in Glucose 120 Minutes Following an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test
NCT02664441 (11) [back to overview]Changes in Fasting Glucose
NCT02664441 (11) [back to overview]Changes in Body Composition as Assessed by Body Fat Mass Using Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA)
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7 % or <=6.5% at Week 52: Single Arm Extension Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Number of Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia Events Per Participant-Year: Single Arm Extension Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Number of Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia Events Per Participant-Year: Core Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Requiring Rescue Therapy During the 52 Week Treatment Period: Single Arm Extension Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Requiring Rescue Therapy During the 26 Week Treatment Period: Core Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Daily Average of the 7-point Self-monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) to Week 52: Single Arm Extension Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) to Week 52: Single Arm Extension Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) to Week 26: Core Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 52: Single Arm Extension Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 26: Core Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Weight to Week 52: Single Arm Extension Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7% or <=6.5% at Week 26: Core Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26: Core Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 2-Hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) During Standardized Meal Test to Week 52: Single Arm Extension Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 2-Hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) During Standardized Meal Test to Week 26: Core Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 2-Hour Blood Glucose Excursion During Standardized Meal Test to Week 52: Single Arm Extension Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 2-Hour Blood Glucose Excursion During Standardized Meal Test to Week 26: Core Period
NCT02787551 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Daily Average of the 7-point Self-monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) to Week 26: Core Period
NCT02793154 (29) [back to overview]Part A: Hematocrit Level at Indicated Time Points
NCT02793154 (29) [back to overview]Part A: Hemoglobin Level at Indicated Time Points
NCT02793154 (29) [back to overview]Part A: Number of Par. With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs)
NCT02793154 (29) [back to overview]Part A: Number of Par. With Presence of Ketones, Occult Blood, Glucose, Nitrates and Leukocyte Esterase in Urine at Indicated Time Points
NCT02793154 (29) [back to overview]Part A: Percentage of Time With the Dominant EGG Frequencies in the Four Frequency Ranges of Bradygastria, Normal, Tachygastria and Duodenal
NCT02793154 (29) [back to overview]Part A: Potential of Hydrogen (pH) of Urine at Indicated Time Points
NCT02793154 (29) [back to overview]Part A: Presence RBC and WBC in Urine Assessed by Microscopy
NCT02793154 (29) [back to overview]Part A: Rate of [13]C Dose Excreted in Breath
NCT02793154 (29) [back to overview]Part A: Ratios of Average Power Post- WLT/Pre-WLT by Frequency Region
NCT02793154 (29) [back to overview]Part A: Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count at Indicated Time Points
NCT02793154 (29) [back to overview]Part A: Specific Gravity of Urine at Indicated Time Points
NCT02793154 (29) [back to overview]Part A: The Volume of Water Ingested During EGG
NCT02793154 (29) [back to overview]Part A: Time to Half-gastric Emptying
NCT02793154 (29) [back to overview]Part A: Total Protein, Albumin Levels at Indicated Time Points
NCT02793154 (29) [back to overview]Part A: Number of Par. With Nausea AEs Presenting Outside the Timing of the WLT and GCSI-DD
NCT02793154 (29) [back to overview]Part A: Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT), Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT) Levels at Indicated Time Points
NCT02793154 (29) [back to overview]Part A: Albumin Level in Urine at Indicated Time Points
NCT02793154 (29) [back to overview]Part A: Assessment of Heart Rate (HR) as a Measure of Safety
NCT02793154 (29) [back to overview]Part A: Assessment of Nausea by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score
NCT02793154 (29) [back to overview]Part A: Assessment of Stomach Fullness, Hunger, Bloating and Abdominal Pain by VAS Score
NCT02793154 (29) [back to overview]Part A: Assessment of Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) as a Measure of Safety
NCT02793154 (29) [back to overview]Part A: Average Dominant Frequency
NCT02793154 (29) [back to overview]Part A: Basophils, Eosinophil, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Platelet Count, Total Neutrophils, White Blood Cell (WBC) Level at Indicated Time Points
NCT02793154 (29) [back to overview]Part A: Concentration of Creatinine in Urine at Indicated Time Points
NCT02793154 (29) [back to overview]Part A: Creatinine, Direct Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin Levels at Indicated Time Points
NCT02793154 (29) [back to overview]Part A: Distribution of Average Power by Frequency Region
NCT02793154 (29) [back to overview]Part A: Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate at Indicated Time Points
NCT02793154 (29) [back to overview]Part A: Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index -Daily Diary (GCSI-DD) Score
NCT02793154 (29) [back to overview]Part A: Glucose, Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Chloride, Urea/Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) Levels
NCT02802514 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Urinalysis
NCT02802514 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Heart Rate for Session 1
NCT02802514 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Heart Rate for Session 1
NCT02802514 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Heart Rate for Session 2
NCT02802514 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Heart Rate for Session 2
NCT02802514 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Heart Rate for Session 2
NCT02802514 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) for Session 1
NCT02802514 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (AE) With Incidence > = 2 % and Serious AEs (SAE)
NCT02802514 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) for Session 1
NCT02802514 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal SBP and DBP for Session 2
NCT02802514 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Heart Rate for Session 2
NCT02802514 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) for Session 1
NCT02802514 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal SBP and DBP for Session 2
NCT02802514 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal SBP and DBP for Session 2
NCT02802514 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) for Session 1
NCT02802514 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Chemistry Parameters
NCT02802514 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Glycemic Parameters
NCT02802514 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology Parameters
NCT02802514 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal SBP and DBP for Session 2
NCT02802514 (29) [back to overview]Gastrointestinal (GI) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Assessment of Nausea for Session 1
NCT02802514 (29) [back to overview]Gastrointestinal (GI) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Assessment of Nausea for Session 1
NCT02802514 (29) [back to overview]GI VAS for Assessment of Nausea for Session 2
NCT02802514 (29) [back to overview]GI VAS for Assessment of Nausea for Session 2
NCT02802514 (29) [back to overview]Motion Sickness Assessment Questionnaire (MSAQ) for Assessment of Nausea for Session 1
NCT02802514 (29) [back to overview]Motion Sickness Assessment Questionnaire (MSAQ) for Assessment of Nausea for Session 1
NCT02802514 (29) [back to overview]MSAQ for Assessment of Nausea for Session 2
NCT02802514 (29) [back to overview]MSAQ for Assessment of Nausea for Session 2
NCT02802514 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Heart Rate for Session 1
NCT02802514 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Heart Rate for Session 1
NCT02975297 (7) [back to overview]Post-quit Craving as Assessed by the Questionnaire of Smoking Urges
NCT02975297 (7) [back to overview]Post-quit Craving as Assessed by the Questionnaire of Smoking Urges
NCT02975297 (7) [back to overview]Post-quit Craving as Assessed by the Questionnaire of Smoking Urges
NCT02975297 (7) [back to overview]Withdrawal Symptoms as Assessed by the Wisconsin Smoking Withdrawal Scale
NCT02975297 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Self-Reported Abstinence and Who Were Biochemically Verified as Abstinent Via Expired CO Level of ≤ 5ppm
NCT02975297 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Self-Reported Abstinence and Who Were Biochemically Verified as Abstinent Via Expired CO Level of ≤ 5ppm
NCT02975297 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Self-Reported Abstinence and Who Were Biochemically Verified as Abstinent Via Expired CO Level of ≤ 5ppm
NCT02981069 (5) [back to overview]Change in Plasma Insulin Concentration
NCT02981069 (5) [back to overview]Change in Endogenous Glucose Production (EGP) After 16 Weeks of Treatment With Each Study Drug.
NCT02981069 (5) [back to overview]Change in Endogenous Glucose Production (EGP) After Acute Exposure to a Single Dose and Again After 16 Weeks of Treatment
NCT02981069 (5) [back to overview]Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Concentration
NCT02981069 (5) [back to overview]Change in Plasma Glucagon Concentration
NCT03151005 (5) [back to overview]Assessment of Reproductive Function
NCT03151005 (5) [back to overview]Assessment of Liver Function
NCT03151005 (5) [back to overview]Assessment of Blood Pressure
NCT03151005 (5) [back to overview]Basic Vital Signs
NCT03151005 (5) [back to overview]Assessment of Reproductive Functions
NCT03167411 (5) [back to overview]Tmax (Time of Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration)
NCT03167411 (5) [back to overview]T1/2 (Apparent Terminal Elimination Half-life)
NCT03167411 (5) [back to overview]Cmax (Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration)
NCT03167411 (5) [back to overview]AUC0-inf (Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity)
NCT03167411 (5) [back to overview]Urinary Glucose Excretion (UGE)
NCT03331289 (1) [back to overview]Change in EGP From Baseline to Post-oral Glucose Load.
NCT03645408 (1) [back to overview]Alcohol Consumption
NCT03961256 (8) [back to overview]Hemoglobin A1c
NCT03961256 (8) [back to overview]Incidence of Mesangial Expansion
NCT03961256 (8) [back to overview]Creatinine
NCT03961256 (8) [back to overview]Graft Loss
NCT03961256 (8) [back to overview]Incidence of Death
NCT03961256 (8) [back to overview]Progression From Prediabetes to Diabetes
NCT03961256 (8) [back to overview]Adverse Events for Exenatide SR Intervention
NCT03961256 (8) [back to overview]Progression From Prediabetes to Diabetes
NCT04941521 (13) [back to overview]Clinical Effect of Exenatide as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Self-reported Cocaine Use on 50% or More Days of the Week
NCT04941521 (13) [back to overview]Clinical Effect of Exenatide as Indicated by Number of Participants Who Had an Increase in Positive Affect Symptoms by Week 6 as Indicated on the Positive/Negative Affect Schedule
NCT04941521 (13) [back to overview]Clinical Effect of Exenatide as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Had a Decrease in Drug Demand by Week 6
NCT04941521 (13) [back to overview]Feasibility as Indicated by Overall Acceptability as Reported on the Satisfaction Survey
NCT04941521 (13) [back to overview]Clinical Effect of Exenatide as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Were Below the Clinical Range for Depression by Week 6 as Indicated by the Beck Depression Inventory
NCT04941521 (13) [back to overview]Clinical Effect of Exenatide as Indicated by Number of Participants Who Had a Decrease in Negative Affect Symptoms Indicated on the Positive/Negative Affect Schedule
NCT04941521 (13) [back to overview]Clinical Effect of Exenatide as Indicated by Number of Participants Who Reported a Reduction in Craving by Week 6 as Indicated by Cocaine Craving on the Brief Substance Craving Scale
NCT04941521 (13) [back to overview]Drug Safety as Assessed by Total Number of Adverse Events Reported During Treatment
NCT04941521 (13) [back to overview]Feasibility as Assessed by Number of Participants Enrolled
NCT04941521 (13) [back to overview]Feasibility as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Completed Treatment
NCT04941521 (13) [back to overview]Feasibility as Assessed by Number of Study Visits Attended
NCT04941521 (13) [back to overview]Feasibility as Assessed by Retention as Indicated by Total Number of Completed Study Visits
NCT04941521 (13) [back to overview]Clinical Effect of Exenatide as Assessed by Cocaine Use During Treatment as Indicated by Number of Participants With Cocaine-positive Urine Drug Screen Results

Percentage of Patients With Hypoglycemic Events

Percentage of patients who experienced at least one episode of hypoglycemia at any point during the 26 week Parent Study (incidence of hypoglycemia = number of patients who experienced at least one episode of hypoglycemia at any point during the 26 week Parent Study divided by the total number of patients who participated in the 26 week Parent Study (NCT00082381)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Exenatide Arm55.32
Insulin Glargine Arm59.93

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <=7%

Percentage of patients in each arm who had HbA1c >7% at baseline and had HbA1c <=7% at week 26 (percentage = [number of subjects with HbA1c <=7% at week 26 divided by number of subjects with HbA1c >7% at baseline] * 100%). (NCT00082381)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Exenatide Arm46.43
Insulin Glargine Arm48.03

[back to top]

Change in 7-point Self-monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Profile

Change in 7-point (pre-breakfast, 2 hour post breakfast, pre-lunch, 2 hour post lunch, pre-dinner, 2 hour post dinner, 0300 hours) SMBG profile from baseline to week 26 (NCT00082381)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 26

,
Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Pre-breakfast: Baseline SMBGPre-breakfast: Change in SMBG at week 262hr post breatfast: Baseline SMBG2hr post breakfast: Change in SMBG at week 26Pre-lunch: Baseline SMBGPre-lunch: Change in SMBG at week 262hr post lunch: Baseline SMBG2hr post lunch: Change in SMBG at week 26Pre-dinner: Baseline SMBGPre-dinner: Change in SMBG at week 262hr post dinner: Baseline SMBG2hr post dinner: Change in SMBG at week 263:00 AM: Baseline SMBG3:00 AM: Change in SMBG at week 26
Exenatide Arm9.47-1.2512.51-3.779.61-1.5011.15-1.689.46-1.1511.17-3.069.02-1.05
Insulin Glargine Arm9.50-2.5612.36-2.869.47-1.9310.96-1.699.35-1.7211.49-1.659.36-1.97

[back to top]

Change in Rate of Hypoglycemic Events

Change in rate of hypoglycemic events per 30 days per patient from baseline to week 26 (NCT00082381)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 26

,
Interventionevents per 30 days per patient (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline event rateChange in event rate at week 26
Exenatide Arm0.090.23
Insulin Glargine Arm0.110.29

[back to top]

Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

Change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26 (NCT00082381)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 26

,
Interventionpercentage (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline HbA1cChange in HbA1c at week 26
Exenatide Arm8.13-1.00
Insulin Glargine Arm8.19-1.05

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Serum Glucose

Change in fasting serum glucose from baseline to week 26 (NCT00082381)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 26

,
Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline fasting serum glucoseChange in fasting serum glucose at week 26
Exenatide Arm10.27-1.22
Insulin Glargine Arm10.46-2.86

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight

Change in body weight from baseline to week 26 (NCT00082381)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 26

,
Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline body weightChange in body weight at week 26
Exenatide Arm88.42-2.32
Insulin Glargine Arm89.251.75

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <=7%

Percentage of patients in each arm who had HbA1c >7% at baseline and had HbA1c <=7% at week 52 (percentage = [number of subjects with HbA1c <=7% at week 52 divided by number of subjects with HbA1c >7% at baseline] * 100%). (NCT00082407)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Exenatide Arm31.7
Biphasic Insulin Aspart Arm24.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Hypoglycemic Events

Percentage of patients who experienced at least one episode of hypoglycemia at any point during the 52 week Parent Study (incidence of hypoglycemia = number of patients who experienced at least one episode of hypoglycemia at any point during the 52 week Parent Study divided by the total number of patients who particiapted in the 52 week Parent Study (NCT00082407)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Exenatide Arm53.0
Biphasic Insulin Aspart Arm51.6

[back to top]

Change in 7-point Self-monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Profile

Change in 7-point (pre-breakfast, after breakfast, pre-lunch, after lunch, pre-dinner, after dinner, 0300 hours) SMBG profile from baseline to week 52 (NCT00082407)
Timeframe: baseline, week 52

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Pre-breakfast: Baseline SMBGPre-breakfast: Change in SMBG at week 52After breakfast: Baseline SMBGAfter breakfast: Change in SMBG at week 52Pre-lunch: Baseline SMBGPre-lunch: Change in SMBG at week 52After lunch: Baseline SMBGAfter lunch: Change in SMBG at week 52Pre-dinner: Baseline SMBGPre-dinner: Change in SMBG at week 52After dinner: Baseline SMBGAfter dinner: Change in SMBG at week 523:00 AM: Baseline SMBG3:00 AM: Change in SMBG at week 52
Biphasic Insulin Aspart Arm9.86-1.6812.71-3.069.86-2.4011.39-1.769.57-1.5211.68-2.449.58-1.95
Exenatide Arm9.57-1.1512.30-3.839.38-1.4711.18-1.729.35-1.0611.25-3.119.08-0.96

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight

Change in body weight from baseline to week 52. (NCT00082407)
Timeframe: baseline, week 52

,
Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline body weightChange in body weight at week 52
Biphasic Insulin Aspart Arm83.382.92
Exenatide Arm85.51-2.54

[back to top]

Change in Rate of Hypoglycemic Events

Change in rate of hypoglycemic events per 30 days per patient from baseline to week 52 (NCT00082407)
Timeframe: baseline, week 52

,
Interventionevents per 30 days per patient (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline event rateChange in event rate at week 52
Biphasic Insulin Aspart Arm0.180.26
Exenatide Arm0.220.19

[back to top]

Change in Glcosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

Change in HbA1c from baseline to week 52 (NCT00082407)
Timeframe: baseline, week 52

,
Interventionpercentage (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline HbA1cChange in HbA1c at week 52
Biphasic Insulin Aspart Arm8.65-0.88
Exenatide Arm8.59-0.98

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Serum Glucose

Change in fasting serum glucose from baseline to week 52 (NCT00082407)
Timeframe: baseline, week 52

,
Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline fasting serum glucoseChange in fasting serum glucose at week 52
Biphasic Insulin Aspart Arm11.30-1.64
Exenatide Arm11.00-1.75

[back to top]

Beta-cell Function 4 Weeks After Cessation of Therapy

Treatment effect on beta-cell function as measured by the ratio of Week 56 arginine-stimulated insulin secretion during a hyperglycemic clamp(specifically, the incremental AUC of insulin with respect to basal value over a 10 min period [i.e., clamp time 290 min to 300 min]) to that at baseline (i.e., the ratio is calculated as arginine-stimulated insulin secretion at week 56 divided by arginine-stimulated insulin secretion at baseline [week -2]). (NCT00097500)
Timeframe: Baseline (week -2) and 56 weeks

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Arm1.02
Insulin Glargine Arm1.08

[back to top]

Beta-cell Function After 52 Weeks of Therapy

Treatment effect on beta-cell function as measured by the ratio of Week 52 arginine-stimulated insulin secretion during a hyperglycemic clamp(specifically, the incremental AUC of insulin with respect to basal value over a 10 min period [i.e., clamp time 290 min to 300 min]) to that at baseline (i.e., the ratio is calculated as arginine-stimulated insulin secretion at week 52 divided by arginine-stimulated insulin secretion at baseline [week -2]). (NCT00097500)
Timeframe: Baseline (week -2) and 52 weeks

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Arm2.89
Insulin Glargine Arm1.15

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight

Change in body weight from week 0 to week 52 (i.e., body weight at week 52 minus body weight at week 0). (NCT00097500)
Timeframe: 0 weeks and 52 weeks

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Arm-3.80
Insulin Glargine Arm0.75

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose

Change in fasting plasma glucose from week 0 to week 52 (i.e., fasting plasma glucose at week 52 minus fasting plasma glucose at week 0). (NCT00097500)
Timeframe: 0 weeks and 52 weeks

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Arm-1.53
Insulin Glargine Arm-3.10

[back to top]

Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

Change in HbA1c from week 0 to week 52 (i.e., HbA1c at week 52 minus HbA1c at week 0). (NCT00097500)
Timeframe: Week 0 and week 52

Interventionpercent (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Arm-0.97
Insulin Glargine Arm-0.87

[back to top]

Change in First Phase C-peptide Release

Ratio of first phase C-peptide response to glucose at 52 weeks (end of on-drug period) and 56 weeks (during off-drug period) compared to first phase C-peptide response to glucose at baseline (i.e., C-peptide response to glucose at week 52 or week 56 divided by C-peptide response to glucose at baseline [week -2]). C-peptide is measured as a surrogate marker of insulin secretion. First phase C-peptide/insulin release is measured during the first ten minutes of glucose infusion during a hyperglycemic clamp procedure. (NCT00097500)
Timeframe: baseline (week -2), 52 weeks, and 56 weeks

,
Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
52 weeks56 weeks
Exenatide Arm1.720.95
Insulin Glargine Arm1.131.06

[back to top]

Change in Second Phase C-peptide Release

Ratio of second phase C-peptide response to glucose at 52 weeks (end of on-drug period) and 56 weeks (during off-drug period) compared to second phase C-peptide response to glucose at baseline (i.e., C-peptide response to glucose at week 52 or week 56 divided by C-peptide response to glucose at baseline [week -2]). C-peptide is measured as a surrogate marker of insulin secretion. Second phase C-peptide/insulin release is measured from time=10 minutes to time=80 minutes of glucose infusion during a hyperglycemic clamp procedure. (NCT00097500)
Timeframe: baseline (-2 weeks), 52 weeks, and 56 weeks

,
Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
52 weeks56 weeks
Exenatide Arm2.881.00
Insulin Glargine Arm1.011.08

[back to top]

M-value at Baseline, Week 52 and Week 56

M-value at baseline (week -2), week 52 (end of on-drug period), and week 56 (during off-drug period). Insulin sensitivity was assessed during the euglycemic/hyperglycemic clamp test at baseline (week -2), week 52, and week 56. Insulin-mediated glucose uptake (M-value) was calculated as the mean glucose requirement during the 90-120 minute interval of the clamp. (NCT00097500)
Timeframe: baseline (week -2), 52 weeks, and 56 weeks

,
Interventionmg/min/kg (Mean)
baseline (week -2)week 52week 56
Exenatide Arm2.243.183.19
Insulin Glargine Arm2.793.852.81

[back to top]

Seven Point Self Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Measurements

SMBG measured at 7 time points (before and after breakfast, before and after lunch, before and after dinner, at bedtime). (NCT00097500)
Timeframe: 0 weeks and 52 weeks

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Pre-breakfast measurement (week 0)Pre-breakfast measurement (week 52)2-hour post-breakfast measurement (week 0)2-hour post-breakfast measurement (week 52)Pre-lunch measurement (week 0)Pre-lunch measurement (week 52)2-hour post-lunch measurement (week 0)2-hour post-lunch measurement (week 52)Pre-dinner measurement (week 0)Pre-dinner measurement (week 52)2-hour post-dinner measurement (week 0)2-hour post-dinner measurement (week 52)Bedtime measurement (week 0)Bedtime measurement (week 52)
Exenatide Arm8.927.2711.006.988.146.529.907.978.387.5310.426.989.767.61
Insulin Glargine Arm8.385.6311.177.538.546.2410.528.158.076.9810.268.819.858.03

[back to top]

Change in Fasting HDL Cholesterol

Change in fasting high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol from baseline to week 20. (NCT00135330)
Timeframe: Week 20

,,
Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline HDLChange from baseline HDL at week 20
Exenatide1.130.022
Exenatide Plus Rosiglitazone1.170.046
Rosiglitazone1.170.055

[back to top]

Change in Waist-to-hip Ratio

Change in waist-to-hip ratio (waist circumference divided by hip circumference) from baseline to week 20 (NCT00135330)
Timeframe: 20 weeks

,,
Interventionratio (cm/cm) (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline waist-to-hip ratioChange in waist-to-hip ratio at week 20
Exenatide0.939-0.016
Exenatide Plus Rosiglitazone0.957-0.022
Rosiglitazone0.943-0.016

[back to top]

Hypoglycemia Rate Per 30 Days Per Patient

Average number of episodes of hypoglycemia per 30 days per patient (NCT00135330)
Timeframe: 20 weeks

Interventionhypoglycemia events / 30 days / patient (Mean)
Exenatide0.391
Exenatide Plus Rosiglitazone0.594
Rosiglitazone0.853

[back to top]

Incidence of Hypoglycemia Events

Number of subjects experiencing hypoglycemia at any point during the study (NCT00135330)
Timeframe: 20 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Exenatide8
Exenatide Plus Rosiglitazone9
Rosiglitazone6

[back to top]

Change in ASIiAUC During a Hyperglycemic Clamp Test.

Change in insulin incremental area under the concentration-time curve (ASIiAUC) from baseline to week 20. ASIiAUC is a measure of beta-cell function. (NCT00135330)
Timeframe: 20 weeks

,,
InterventionuIU-min/ml (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline ASIiAUCChange in ASIiAUC at week 20
Exenatide643.40747.26
Exenatide Plus Rosiglitazone686.41194.68
Rosiglitazone786.12-99.85

[back to top]

Change in AUC for C-peptide During a Meal Challenge Test (MCT).

Ratio (value at endpoint divided by value at baseline) of AUC(15-180 min) for C-peptide (nmol-min/L) during a MCT from baseline to week 20. (NCT00135330)
Timeframe: Week 20

,,
Interventionnmol-min/L (Geometric Mean)
Baseline C-peptide during a MCTRatio(endpoint/baseline) of C-peptide during a MCT
Exenatide319.770.908
Exenatide Plus Rosiglitazone310.510.804
Rosiglitazone325.650.854

[back to top]

Change in AUC for Glucose During a Meal Challenge Test (MCT).

Change in AUC(15-180 min) for glucose during a MCT baseline to week 20. (NCT00135330)
Timeframe: Week 20

,,
Interventionmmol-min/L (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline glucose AUC during MCTChange in glucose AUC during MCT at week 20
Exenatide1782.86-560.12
Exenatide Plus Rosiglitazone1799.68-635.24
Rosiglitazone1741.87-425.59

[back to top]

Change in Body Fat Mass During a Meal Challenge Test (MCT)

Change in body fat mass form baseline to week 20, as assessed during an MCT (NCT00135330)
Timeframe: 20 weeks

,,
Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline body fat massChange in body fat mass at week 20
Exenatide32.05-2.76
Exenatide Plus Rosiglitazone32.55-1.06
Rosiglitazone30.54-1.99

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight

Change in body weight from baseline to week 20. (NCT00135330)
Timeframe: Week 20

,,
Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline body weightChange in body weight at week 20
Exenatide93.05-2.82
Exenatide Plus Rosiglitazone93.76-1.21
Rosiglitazone91.781.48

[back to top]

Pedal Edema Score

"Pedal edema scores experienced by each patient throughout the study (1+ indicates a patient experienced a pedal edema score of 1 , 2, or 3; 2+ indicates a patient experienced a pedal edema score of 2 or 3, etc.)~Scale:~Slight pitting, no visible distortion, disappears rapidly~A somewhat deeper pit than in 1+, but again no readily detectable distortion, and it disappears in 10 - 15 seconds~The pit is noticeably deep and may last more than a minute; the dependent extremity looks fuller and swollen~The pit is very deep, lasts as long as 2 - 5 minutes, and the dependent extremity is grossly distorted" (NCT00135330)
Timeframe: 20 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
No edemaEdema score: 1+Edema score: 2+Edema score: 3+
Exenatide37710
Exenatide Plus Rosiglitazone341130
Rosiglitazone301461

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Insulin

Change in fasting insulin from baseline to week 20. (NCT00135330)
Timeframe: Week 20

,,
InterventionuIU/ml (Geometric Mean)
Baseline fasting insulinRatio (wk20/baseline)of fasting insulin
Exenatide12.840.980
Exenatide Plus Rosiglitazone10.960.599
Rosiglitazone12.770.755

[back to top]

Change in Fasting LDL Cholesterol

Change in fasting low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol from baseline to week 20. (NCT00135330)
Timeframe: Week 20

,,
Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline LDLChange from baseline LDL at week 20
Exenatide2.59-0.049
Exenatide Plus Rosiglitazone2.570.096
Rosiglitazone2.710.334

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Proinsulin

Ratio (endpoint value divided by baseline value) for fasting proinsulin, comparing endpoint (week 20) to baseline (NCT00135330)
Timeframe: Week 20

,,
Interventionpmol/L (Geometric Mean)
Baseline fasting proinsulinRatio(wk20/baseline)of fasting proinsulin
Exenatide4.320.663
Exenatide Plus Rosiglitazone3.800.538
Rosiglitazone3.560.623

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Serum Glucose Concentration.

Change in fasting serum glucose concentration from baseline to week 20. (NCT00135330)
Timeframe: Week 20

,,
Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline fasting serum glucoseChange fr baseline fasting serum glucose at wk 20
Exenatide8.42-1.46
Exenatide Plus Rosiglitazone8.43-1.60
Rosiglitazone8.48-1.80

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Total Cholesterol.

Change in fasting total cholestrol from baseline to week 20. (NCT00135330)
Timeframe: Week 20

,,
Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline total cholesterolChange fr baseline total cholesterol at week 20
Exenatide4.42-0.128
Exenatide Plus Rosiglitazone4.410.258
Rosiglitazone4.620.438

[back to top]

Ratio (Value at Endpoint Divided by Value at Baseline) of AUC for Insulin During a Meal Challenge Test (MCT).

Ratio (value at endpoint divided by value at baseline) of AUC (15-180 min) for insulin (uIU-min/ml) during MCT. (NCT00135330)
Timeframe: Week 20

,,
InterventionuIU-min/ml (Geometric Mean)
Baseline AUC for insulin during MCTRatio(endpoint/baseline) of insulin AUC during MCT
Exenatide5171.400.806
Exenatide Plus Rosiglitazone4324.130.664
Rosiglitazone5816.830.722

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c

Change in HbA1c from baseline to week 20. (NCT00135330)
Timeframe: Week 20

,,
InterventionPercentage (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline HbA1cChange from baseline HbA1c at week 20
Exenatide7.79-0.908
Exenatide Plus Rosiglitazone7.84-1.31
Rosiglitazone7.92-0.968

[back to top]

Change in Hip Circumference

Change in hip circumference form baseline to week 20 (NCT00135330)
Timeframe: 20 weeks

,,
Interventioncm (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline hip circumferenceChange in hip circumference at week 20
Exenatide113.29-1.28
Exenatide Plus Rosiglitazone112.120.147
Rosiglitazone111.901.51

[back to top]

Change in Incremental for Postprandial C-peptide During Meal Challenge Test (MCT).

Change in incremental for postprandial C-peptide (mmol/L) during MCT from baseline to week 20. (NCT00135330)
Timeframe: Week 20

,,
Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline C-peptide at 15 minChange fr baseline C-peptide at 15 min at week 20Baseline C-peptide at 30 minChange fr baseline C-peptide at 30 min at week 20Baseline C-peptide at 60 minChange fr baseline C-peptide at 60 min at week 20Baseline C-peptide at 90 minChange fr baseline C-peptide at 90 min at week 20Baseline C-peptide at 120 minChange fr baseline C-peptide at 120 min at week 20Baseline C-peptide at 150 minChange fr baseline C-peptide at 150 min at week 20Baseline C-peptide at 180 minChange fr baseline C-peptide at 180 min at week 20
Exenatide0.238-0.0060.521-0.0710.818-0.1480.895-0.1850.817-0.2590.843-0.2510.610-0.075
Exenatide Plus Rosiglitazone0.2590.0160.517-0.0360.871-0.0250.953-0.1170.828-0.1340.651-0.2540.482-0.238
Rosiglitazone0.2060.0870.5600.0990.8810.0541.03-0.0520.972-0.0160.813-0.0930.619-0.092

[back to top]

Change in Incremental for Postprandial Glucose During a Meal Challenge Test (MCT).

Change in incremental for postprandial glucose (mmol/L) during a MCT from baseline to week 20. (NCT00135330)
Timeframe: Week 20

,,
Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline glucose at 15 minChange fr baseline glucose at 15 min at wk 20Baseline glucose at 30 minChange fr baseline glucose at 30 min at wk 20Baseline glucose at 60 minutesChange fr baseline glucose at 60 min at wk 20Baseline glucose at 90 minutesChange fr baseline glucose at 90 min at wk 20Baseline glucose at 120 minutesChange fr baseline glucose at 120 min at wk 20Baseline glucose at 150 minutesChange fr baseline glucose at 150 min at wk 20Baseline glucose at 180 minutesChange fr baseline glucose at 180 min at wk 20
Exenatide0.950-0.6512.39-1.463.59-2.563.24-2.872.49-2.241.62-1.420.461-0.583
Exenatide Plus Rosiglitazone1.12-0.2862.54-1.063.88-2.463.36-2.912.24-2.521.14-1.950.036-0.995
Rosiglitazone0.8280.1502.23-0.0663.48-0.7203.48-0.9522.31-0.9121.25-0.8300.279-0.481

[back to top]

Change in Incremental for Postprandial Insulin During Meal Challenge Test (MCT).

Change in incremental for postprandial insulin (mmol/L) during meal challenge test (MCT) from baseline to week 20. (NCT00135330)
Timeframe: Week 20

,,
Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline insulin at 15 minChange fr baseline insulin at 15 min at wk 20Baseline insulin at 30 minChange fr baseline insulin at 30 min at wk 20Baseline insulin at 60 minChange fr baseline insulin at 60 min at wk 20Baseline insulin at 90 minChange fr baseline insulin at 90 min at wk 20Baseline insulin at 120 minChange fr baseline insulin at 120 min at wk 20Baseline insulin at 150 minChange fr baseline insulin at 150 min at wk 20Baseline insulin at 180 minChange fr baseline insulin at 180 min at wk 20
Exenatide9.97-1.7119.81-3.0027.92-11.0426.06-9.4219.56-11.2615.67-7.4810.580.031
Exenatide Plus Rosiglitazone8.09-1.8414.79-2.6327.67-7.4721.85-9.2717.52-8.6912.74-8.138.18-5.26
Rosiglitazone7.53-0.45518.83-1.0432.09-7.4232.25-6.1925.47-6.4318.11-5.5710.74-4.04

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Triglycerides

Ratio (endpint value divided by baseline value) of fasting triglycerides from baseline to week 20. (NCT00135330)
Timeframe: Week 20

,,
Interventionmmol/L (Geometric Mean)
Baseline triglycerideRatio (endpoint/baseline) for triglycerides
Exenatide1.560.861
Exenatide Plus Rosiglitazone1.670.977
Rosiglitazone1.760.992

[back to top]

Change in Insulin iAUC From Baseline to Endpoint.

"Change in insulin iAUC in the first stage(uIU-min/ml) from baseline to week 20. First stage represents the first 10 minutes after reaching a steady state during a hyperglycemic clamp test." (NCT00135330)
Timeframe: Week 20

,,
InterventionuIU-min/ml (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline insulin iAUCChange from baseline insulin iAUC at week 20
Exenatide5.9899.08
Exenatide Plus Rosiglitazone-9.9253.71
Rosiglitazone23.0911.51

[back to top]

Change in Insulin Sensitivity Index as Measured by M-value.

Change of M-Value (mg/kg-min) during hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp test from baseline to week 20. (NCT00135330)
Timeframe: Week 20

,,
Interventionmg/kg-min (Least Squares Mean)
M-Value at baselineChange in M-Value from baseline at week 20
Exenatide3.890.477
Exenatide Plus Rosiglitazone2.492.07
Rosiglitazone4.021.42

[back to top]

Change in Lean Body Mass During a Meal Challenge Test (MCT)

Change in lean body mass from baseline to week 20, as assessed during an MCT (NCT00135330)
Timeframe: 20 weeks

,,
Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline lean body massChange in lean body mass at week 20
Exenatide64.62-2.99
Exenatide Plus Rosiglitazone60.940.532
Rosiglitazone61.091.23

[back to top]

Change in Percent Body Fat During a Meal Challenge Test (MCT)

Change in percent body fat from baseline to week 20, as assessed during an MCT (NCT00135330)
Timeframe: 20 weeks

,,
Interventionpercentage (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline percent body fatChange in percent body fat at week 20
Exenatide33.42-1.40
Exenatide Plus Rosiglitazone34.07-0.347
Rosiglitazone32.50-1.18

[back to top]

Change in Waist Circumference

Change in waist circumference from baseline to week 20 (NCT00135330)
Timeframe: 20 weeks

,,
Interventioncm (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline waist circumferenceChange in waist circumference at Week 20
Exenatide105.98-2.95
Exenatide Plus Rosiglitazone106.85-2.38
Rosiglitazone105.34-0.225

[back to top]

Change in Insulin AUC in the First Stage From Baseline to Endpoint.

"Change in insulin AUC in the first stage(uIU-min/ml) from baseline to week 20. First stage represents the first 10 minutes after reaching a steady state during a hyperglycemic clamp test." (NCT00135330)
Timeframe: Week 20

,,
InterventionuIU-min/ml (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline insulin AUCChange from baseline insulin AUC at week 20
Exenatide200.50134.88
Exenatide Plus Rosiglitazone136.8432.12
Rosiglitazone157.49-50.81

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 30

Absolute change in HbA1c from Baseline (Day -3) to Week 30 [Week 30 - Baseline] (NCT00308139)
Timeframe: Day -3, Week 30

Interventionpercentage of total hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-1.87
Exenatide Twice Daily-1.54

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 364

Absolute change in HbA1c from Baseline (Day -3) to Week 364 (NCT00308139)
Timeframe: Day -3, Week 364

Interventionpercentage of total hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly -> Exenatide Once Weekly-1.49
Exenatide Twice Daily -> Exenatide Once Weekly-1.57
All Treatment-1.53

[back to top]

Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 30

Change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) from baseline (Day -3) to Week 30. (NCT00308139)
Timeframe: Day -3, Week 30

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-0.9
Exenatide Twice Daily-1.3

[back to top]

Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 364

Change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) from baseline (Day -3) to Week 364. (NCT00308139)
Timeframe: Day -3, Week 364

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly -> Exenatide Once Weekly2.2
Exenatide Twice Daily -> Exenatide Once Weekly3.4
All Treatment2.8

[back to top]

Change in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) From Baseline to Week 364

Change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from baseline (Day -3) to Week 364. (NCT00308139)
Timeframe: Day -3, Week 364

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly -> Exenatide Once Weekly-13.6
Exenatide Twice Daily -> Exenatide Once Weekly-7.5
All Treatment-10.4

[back to top]

Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 30

Change in total cholesterol from baseline (Day -3) to Week 30. (NCT00308139)
Timeframe: Day -3, Week 30

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-11.9
Exenatide Twice Daily-3.8

[back to top]

Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 364

Change in total cholesterol from baseline (Day -3) to Week 364. (NCT00308139)
Timeframe: Day -3, Week 364

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly -> Exenatide Once Weekly-15.0
Exenatide Twice Daily -> Exenatide Once Weekly-4.8
All Treatment-9.6

[back to top]

Exenatide LAR Steady State Concentration From Week 29 to Week 30

Steady-state plasma exenatide concentration over the dosing interval of Week 29 to Week 30 (0-168 hours) was evaluated. Geometric mean for the average steady-state concentration and its 10th and 90th percentiles were reported. (NCT00308139)
Timeframe: Week 29 to Week 30

Interventionpg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly300.23

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Target of <=6.0%

Percentage of subjects achieving HbA1c target values of <=6.0% at Week 30. (NCT00308139)
Timeframe: Week 30

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Exenatide Once Weekly23.0
Exenatide Twice Daily16.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Target of <=6.5%

Percentages of subjects achieving HbA1c target values of <=6.5% at Week 30. (NCT00308139)
Timeframe: Week 30

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Exenatide Once Weekly3.0
Exenatide Twice Daily16.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Target of <=6.5%

Percentages of subjects achieving HbA1c target values of <=6.5% at Week 364 (NCT00308139)
Timeframe: Week 364

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Exenatide Once Weekly -> Exenatide Once Weekly22.4
Exenatide Twice Daily -> Exenatide Once Weekly37.5
All Treatmeat30.3

[back to top]

Ratio of Triglycerides at Week 364 to Baseline

Ratio of triglycerides (measured in mg/dL) at Week 364 to baseline (Day -3). Log (Postbaseline Triglycerides) - log (Baseline Triglycerides); change from baseline to endpoint is presented as ratio of endpoint to baseline. (NCT00308139)
Timeframe: Day -3, Week 364

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly -> Exenatide Once Weekly0.91
Exenatide Twice Daily -> Exenatide Once Weekly0.94
All Treatment0.93

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Target of <7%

Percentage of subjects achieving HbA1c target value of <7% at Week 30. (NCT00308139)
Timeframe: Week 30

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Exenatide Once Weekly70.9
Exenatide Twice Daily51.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Target of <7%

Percentages of subjects achieving HbA1c target value of <7% at Week 364 (NCT00308139)
Timeframe: Week 364

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Exenatide Once Weekly -> Exenatide Once Weekly41.4
Exenatide Twice Daily -> Exenatide Once Weekly50.0
All Treatment45.9

[back to top]

Ratio of Triglycerides at Week 30 to Baseline

Ratio of triglycerides (measured in mg/dL) at Week 30 to baseline (Day -3). Log (Postbaseline Triglycerides) - log (Baseline Triglycerides); change from baseline to endpoint is presented as ratio of endpoint to baseline. (NCT00308139)
Timeframe: Day -3, Week 30

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly0.85
Exenatide Twice Daily0.89

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline to Week 364

Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline (Day -3) to Week 364. (NCT00308139)
Timeframe: Day -3, Week 364

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly -> Exenatide Once Weekly-18.3
Exenatide Twice Daily -> Exenatide Once Weekly-27.7
All Treatment-23.6

[back to top]

Change in Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 364

Change in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure and Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure from baseline to Week 364 (NCT00308139)
Timeframe: Day -3, Week 364

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Sitting Systolic Blood PressureSitting Diastolic Blood Pressure
All Treatment1.2-2.7
Exenatide Once Weekly -> Exenatide Once Weekly1.3-1.7
Exenatide Twice Daily -> Exenatide Once WeeklyEdit1.0-3.6

[back to top]

Change in Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 30

Change in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure and Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure from baseline to Week 30 (NCT00308139)
Timeframe: Day -3, Week 30

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Sitting Systolic Blood PressureSitting Diastolic Blood Pressure
Exenatide Once Weekly-4.4-1.1
Exenatide Twice Daily-3.8-2.3

[back to top]

Assessment on Event Rate of Treatment-emergent Hypoglycemic Events With SU Use at Screening

The major hypoglycemia category included events that, in the judgment of the investigator or physician, resulted in loss of consciousness, seizure, coma, or other change in mental status consistent with neuroglycopenia, in which symptoms resolved after administration of intramuscular glucagon or intravenous glucose, required third-party assistance, and was accompanied by a blood glucose concentration of less than 54 mg/dL prior to treatment, whether or not symptoms of hypoglycemia were perceived by the subject. The minor hypoglycemia were accompanied by a blood glucose concentration of less than 54 mg/dL prior to treatment and not classified as major hypoglycemia. (NCT00308139)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 364

,,,
Interventionevents per subject-year (Mean)
Major hypoglycemic eventsMinor hypoglycemic events
Exenatide Once Weekly -> Exenatide Once Weekly With SU0.000.49
Exenatide Once Weekly With SU0.000.000.570.36
Exenatide Twice Daily -> Exenatide Once Weekly With SU0.000.22
Exenatide Twice Daily With SU0.000.38

[back to top]

Assessment on Event Rate of Treatment-emergent Hypoglycemic Events With Non-SU Use at Screening

The major hypoglycemia category included events that, in the judgment of the investigator or physician, resulted in loss of consciousness, seizure, coma, or other change in mental status consistent with neuroglycopenia, in which symptoms resolved after administration of intramuscular glucagon or intravenous glucose, required third-party assistance, and was accompanied by a blood glucose concentration of less than 54 mg/dL prior to treatment, whether or not symptoms of hypoglycemia were perceived by the subject. The minor hypoglycemia were accompanied by a blood glucose concentration of less than 54 mg/dL prior to treatment and not classified as major hypoglycemia. (NCT00308139)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 364

,,,
Interventionevents per subject-year (Mean)
Major hypoglycemic eventsMinor hypoglycemic events
Exenatide Once Weekly -> Exenatide Once Weekly With Non-SU0.000.03
Exenatide Once Weekly With Non-SU0.000.000.000.04
Exenatide Twice Daily -> Exenatide Once Weekly With Non-SU0.000.06
Exenatide Twice Daily With Non-SU0.000.02

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 364

Change in body weight from baseline (Day -3) to Week 364 (NCT00308139)
Timeframe: Day -3, Week 364

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly -> Exenatide Once Weekly-5.25
Exenatide Twice Daily -> Exenatide Once Weekly-2.71
All Treatment-3.87

[back to top]

Change in 2 Hours (2h) Postprandial Glucose From Baseline to Week 14

Change in 2h Postprandial Glucose from baseline (Day -3) to Week 14 (NCT00308139)
Timeframe: Day -3, Week 14

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-95.88
Exenatide Twice Daily-125.96

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 30

Change in body weight from baseline (Day -3) to Week 30 (NCT00308139)
Timeframe: Day -3, Week 30

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-3.67
Exenatide Twice Daily-3.59

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline to Week 30

Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline (Day -3) to Week 30. (NCT00308139)
Timeframe: Day -3, Week 30

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-41.5
Exenatide Twice Daily-24.6

[back to top]

First Will be the Changes in TNG Stimulated Arterial Dilation (Endothelial-independent) in Subjects Treated With Exenatide Compared With Subjects Treated With Lantus at the End of the Study Compared to Baseline Measurements

Trinitroglycerin (TNG) response evaluates endothelium independent vasodilation. The brachial artery was scanned before and 5 minutes after sublingual administration of 400 ug of trinitroglycerin. This was performed only at 4 hours following the test meal and fifteen minutes after completion of the FMD study to allow for the brachial artery to return to baseline. This was performed at both the baseline and 3 month visits. (NCT00353834)
Timeframe: Baseline and end of study

InterventionPercentage dilation (Mean)
Glargine Insulin10.7
Exenatide11.3

[back to top]

The Primary Endpoint Was the Change in FMD at the End of the Study Compared to Baseline Measurements in Subjects Treated With Exenatide Compared to Subjects Treated With Lantus.

Flow mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery was measured at rest and during reactive hyperemia using a high-resolution 10.0 MHz linear array transducer and an HOI Ultramark 9 system. Reactive hyperemia was produced by inflating a pneumatic tourniquet on the forearm distal to the brachial artery to 50 mmHg above the systolic BP for 5 minutes, then deflating it . Brachial artery diameter was measured before inflation of the cuff and 1-2 minutes after cuff deflation and expressed as the percentage change. This protocol is described in detail elsewhere. This was performed fasting, 2, and 4 hours after the meal challenge at baseline and 3 months. (NCT00353834)
Timeframe: Baseline and End of Study

InterventionPercentage dilation (Mean)
Glargine Insulin5.0
Exenatide4.7

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Treatment Failure

Treatment failure is defined as one of the following:1. HbA1c exceeding 9% at any visit after the initial 3 months of treatment (i.e., earliest at Month 6), on the maximally tolerated dose of antidiabetic agents. 2. HbA1c exceeding 7% at 2 consecutive visits 3 months apart, after the initial 6 months of treatment (i.e., earliest at Month 9), on the maximally tolerated dose of antidiabetic agents. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)

,
Interventionnumber of patients (Number)
Number of patients with treatment failureNumber of patients censored
Exen + Met203287
Glim + Met262225

[back to top]

Triglycerides at Year 3

Triglycerides at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met1.69
Glim + Met1.95

[back to top]

Total Cholesterol at Year 3

Total Cholesterol at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met4.77
Glim + Met4.75

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure

Treatment failure is defined as one of the following:1. HbA1c exceeding 9% at any visit after the initial 3 months of treatment (i.e., earliest at Month 6), on the maximally tolerated dose of antidiabetic agents. 2. HbA1c exceeding 7% at 2 consecutive visits 3 months apart, after the initial 6 months of treatment (i.e., earliest at Month 9), on the maximally tolerated dose of antidiabetic agents. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionweek (Median)
Exen + Met180.0
Glim + Met142.1

[back to top]

Systolic Blood Pressure at Year 3

Systolic Blood pressure at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met130.58
Glim + Met135.78

[back to top]

Ratio of the 30 Minute Increment in Plasma Insulin Concentration and the 30 Minute Increment in Plasma Glucose During the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (DI30/DG30 Ratio) at Year 3

DI30/DG30 at Year 3. DI30/DG30 ratio was calculated as (30 minute post prandial insulin - fasting insulin) (measured in pmol/L)/(30 minute post prandial glucose - fasting glucose) (measured in mmol/L). (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met25.81
Glim + Met26.38

[back to top]

High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol at Year 3

HDL Cholesterol at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met1.31
Glim + Met1.25

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Year 2 for Patients Not Randomized at Entry in Period III

Change in HbA1c from baseline to Year 2. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline in Period III, Year 2 in Period III

Interventionpercentage of total hemoglobin (Mean)
Glim + Met + Exen - Not Randomized-0.47

[back to top]

Heart Rate at Year 3

Heart rate at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

Interventionbeats per minute (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met73.51
Glim + Met74.23

[back to top]

Fasting Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio at Year 3

Fasting proinsulin (measured in pmol/L)/insulin (measured in pmol/L) ratio at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met0.22
Glim + Met0.23

[back to top]

Fasting Plasma Glucose at Year 3

Fasting plasma glucose at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met7.27
Glim + Met7.96

[back to top]

Disposition Index at Year 3

Disposition Index at Year 3. Disposition index was calculated as (DI30/DG30 ratio)/(HOMA index for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)); where HOMA-IR=(fasting insulin (measured in pmol/L) x fasting glucose (measured in mmol/L))/(22.5 x 7.175). (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met12.56
Glim + Met7.89

[back to top]

Diastolic Blood Pressure at Year 3

Diastolic Blood pressure at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met77.45
Glim + Met79.16

[back to top]

Change in Postprandial (2 Hours) Plasma Glucose From Baseline to Endpoint

Change from baseline in postprandial (2 hours) plasma glucose to endpoint. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met-2.72
Glim + Met-0.53

[back to top]

Change in HOMA-B From Baseline to Endpoint

Change in HOMA-B from baseline to endpoint. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met5.56
Glim + Met19.92

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Endpoint

Change in HbA1c from baseline to endpoint. Endpoint for HbA1c was defined as the HbA1c measured at the treatment failure for patients reaching primary endpoint and was the last observation in study period II for other patients (either followed until the end of the study period II or discontinuing the study). (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionpercentage of total hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met-0.36
Glim + Met-0.21

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio From Baseline to Endpoint.

Change in fasting proinsulin (measured in pmol/L)/insulin (measured in pmol/L) ratio from baseline to endpoint. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met0.03
Glim + Met0.05

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline to Endpoint

Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to endpoint. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met-0.87
Glim + Met-0.41

[back to top]

Change in Disposition Index From Baseline to Endpoint

Change in disposition index from baseline to endpoint. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met9.15
Glim + Met1.82

[back to top]

Change in DI30/DG30 Ratio From Baseline to Endpoint

Change in DI30/DG30 ratio from baseline to endpoint. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met12.10
Glim + Met0.91

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Year 3

Change in Body weight from baseline to Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, Year 3 in Period II

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met-3.92
Glim + Met1.47

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Year 3

Change in HbA1c from baseline to Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, Year 3 in Period II

Interventionpercentage of total hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met-0.30
Glim + Met-0.12

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Year 2 for Patients Randomized at Entry in Period III

Change in HbA1c from baseline to Year 2. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline in Period III, Year 2 in Period III

Interventionpercentage of total hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met + Glim - Randomized-0.19
Exen + Met + Pio or Rosi - Randomized-0.47

[back to top]

Postprandial (2 Hours) Plasma Glucose at Year 3

Postprandial (2 hours) plasma glucose at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met12.65
Glim + Met15.45

[back to top]

Hypoglycemia Rate Per Year in Period III

All hypoglycemia episodes were taken into account. Severe hypoglycemia: event requiring assistance of another person to administer carbohydrate, glucagons, or other resuscitative actions; Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia: event with typical symptoms accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration <=70 mg/dL; Asymptomatic hypoglycemia: event not accompanied by typical symptoms but with a measured plasma glucose concentration <=70 mg/dL; Probable symptomatic hypoglycemia: event with symptoms not accompanied by a plasma glucose determination. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Start of Period III to end of study

Interventionevents per subject-year (Mean)
Exen + Metformin + Glim - Randomized2.78
Exen + Met + Pio or Rosi - Randomized0.60
Glim + Met + Exen - Not Randomized4.62

[back to top]

Hypoglycemia Rate Per Year

All hypoglycemia episodes were taken into account. Severe hypoglycemia: event requiring assistance of another person to administer carbohydrate, glucagons, or other resuscitative actions; Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia: event with typical symptoms accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration <=70 mg/dL; Asymptomatic hypoglycemia: event not accompanied by typical symptoms but with a measured plasma glucose concentration <=70 mg/dL; Probable symptomatic hypoglycemia: event with symptoms not accompanied by a plasma glucose determination. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionevents per subject-year (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met1.52
Glim + Met5.32

[back to top]

Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta-cell Function (HOMA-B) at Year 3

HOMA-B at Year 3. HOMA-B is an index of beta-cell function and was calculated as: HOMA-B = (20 x fasting insulin (measured in pmol/L))/((fasting glucose (measured in mmol/L) - 3.5) x 7.175). (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met66.86
Glim + Met68.52

[back to top]

Percent of Patients Achieving HbA1c < 6.5%

Percent of patients achieving specified HbA1c target at endpoint (NCT00360334)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Exenatide15.3
Insulin Glargine11.2

[back to top]

Change in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol

Change in HDL cholesterol from baseline to endpoint (NCT00360334)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide0.01
Insulin Glargine0.02

[back to top]

Percent of Patients Achieving 10% Weight Loss

Percent of patients who lost at least 10% of baseline body weight at endpoint (NCT00360334)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Exenatide4.2
Insulin Glargine0.0

[back to top]

Percent Change in Body Weight

Percent change in baseline body weight at endpoint (NCT00360334)
Timeframe: 26 Weeks

InterventionPercentage (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide-2.8
Insulin Glargine3.1

[back to top]

Nocturnal Hypoglycemic Rate Per 30 Days

Number of nocturnal hypoglycemic episodes per patient adjusted per 30 days (NCT00360334)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

InterventionNumber of episodes per 30 days (Median)
Exenatide0.000
Insulin Glargine0.000

[back to top]

Incidence of Severe Hypoglycemic Episodes

Percent of total patients in each arm experiencing severe hypoglycemia at any point during the 26 week study (NCT00360334)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

Interventionpercent (Number)
Exenatide4.2
Insulin Glargine5.3

[back to top]

Incidence of Nocturnal Hypoglycemic Episodes

Percent of total patients in each arm experiencing nocturnal hypoglycemia at any point in the 26 week study (NCT00360334)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

Interventionpercent (Number)
Exenatide11.9
Insulin Glargine29.8

[back to top]

Percent of Patients Achieving 5% Weight Loss

Percent of patients who lost at least 5% of baseline body weight at endpoint (NCT00360334)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Exenatide19.5
Insulin Glargine0.9

[back to top]

Incidence of Hypoglycemic Episodes

Percent of total patients in each arm experiencing hypoglycemia at any point in the 26 week study (NCT00360334)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

Interventionpercent (Number)
Exenatide50.0
Insulin Glargine59.6

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Serum Triglycerides

Change in fasting serum triglycerides from baseline to endpoint (NCT00360334)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide-0.33
Insulin Glargine-0.38

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Serum Glucose

Change in fasting serum glucose from baseline (week 0) to endpoint (week 26) (NCT00360334)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide-2.12
Insulin Glargine-3.61

[back to top]

Percent of Patients Achieving HbA1c < 7%

Percent of patients achieving specified HbA1c target at endpoint (NCT00360334)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Exenatide34.7
Insulin Glargine43.1

[back to top]

Change in Apolipoprotein-B

Change in apolipoprotein-B from baseline to endpoint (NCT00360334)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

Interventiong/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide-0.09
Insulin Glargine-0.08

[back to top]

Change in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol

Change in LDL cholesterol from baseline to endpoint (NCT00360334)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide-0.25
Insulin Glargine-0.07

[back to top]

Change in TC to HDL Cholesterol Ratio

Change in TC to HDL cholesterol ratio from baseline to endpoint (NCT00360334)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

InterventionRatio (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide-0.40
Insulin Glargine-0.34

[back to top]

Hypoglycemic Rate Per 30 Days

Number of hypoglycemic episodes per patient adjusted per 30 days (NCT00360334)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

InterventionNumber of episodes per 30 days (Median)
Exenatide0.069
Insulin Glargine0.164

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Serum Total Cholesterol (TC)

Change in TC from baseline to endpoint (NCT00360334)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide-0.36
Insulin Glargine-0.21

[back to top]

Change in Waist-to-hip Ratio

Change in waist-to-hip ratio from baseline to endpoint (NCT00360334)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

,
InterventionRatio (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (Week 0)Change at endpoint (Week 26)
Exenatide0.99-0.02
Insulin Glargine0.980.01

[back to top]

Change in Waist Circumference

Change in waist circumference from baseline to endpoint (NCT00360334)
Timeframe: 26 Weeks

,
Interventioncm (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (Week 0)Change at endpoint (Week 26)
Exenatide112.07-2.19
Insulin Glargine110.641.97

[back to top]

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure

Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to endpoint (NCT00360334)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (Week 0)Change at endpoint (Week 26)
Exenatide134.0-3.6
Insulin Glargine134.70.6

[back to top]

Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure

Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to endpoint (NCT00360334)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (Week 0)Change at endpoint (Week 26)
Exenatide79.6-0.8
Insulin Glargine79.70.9

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight

Change in body weight from baseline to endpoint (NCT00360334)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

,
Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (Week 0)Change at endpoint (Week 26)
Exenatide101.19-2.73
Insulin Glargine97.932.98

[back to top]

Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)

Change in BMI from baseline to endpoint (NCT00360334)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

,
Interventionkg/m^2 (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (Week 0)Change at endpoint (Week 26)
Exenatide34.49-0.95
Insulin Glargine33.711.01

[back to top]

Change in 7 Point Self Monitored Blood Glucose Profile

Change from baseline to endpoint in self monitored blood glucose levels measured at 7 time points during the day (NCT00360334)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Pre-breakfast: Baseline (Week 0)Pre-breakfast: Change at endpoint (Week 26)2 hrs after breakfast: Baseline (Week 0)2 hrs after breakfast: Change at endpt (Week 26)Pre-lunch: Baseline (Week 0)Pre-lunch: Change at endpoint (Week 26)2 hrs after lunch: Baseline (Week 0)2 hrs after lunch: Change at endpoint (Week 26)Pre-dinner: Baseline (Week 0)Pre-dinner: Change at endpoint (Week 26)2 hrs after dinner: Baseline (Week 0)2 hrs after dinner: Change at endpoint (Week 26)Bedtime: Baseline (Week 0)Bedtime: Change at endpoint (Week 26)
Exenatide9.98-2.0113.53-5.099.95-2.2112.07-3.209.95-2.1312.59-4.5911.63-3.56
Insulin Glargine9.88-3.9913.33-3.959.54-2.5911.15-2.489.37-1.4611.80-2.0611.24-2.20

[back to top]

Severe Hypoglycemic Rate Per 30 Days

Number of severe hypoglycemic episodes per patient adjusted per 30 days (NCT00360334)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

InterventionNumber of episodes per 30 days (Median)
Exenatide0.000
Insulin Glargine0.000

[back to top]

Percent of Patients Who Achieved HbA1c ≤ 7.4% With Minimal Weight Gain (≤ 1kg)

Composite endpoint evaluating effect of treatment on glycemic control and weight (NCT00360334)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Exenatide53.4
Insulin Glargine19.8

[back to top]

Percent of Patients Who Achieved HbA1c ≤ 7.4% and Weight Gain ≤ 0.5kg

Composite endpoint evaluating effect of treatment on glycemic control and weight (NCT00360334)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Exenatide52.5
Insulin Glargine16.4

[back to top]

Percent of Patients Achieving HbA1c ≤ 7.4%

Percent of patients achieving specified HbA1c target at endpoint (NCT00360334)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Exenatide54.2
Insulin Glargine61.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol at Week 24

Change in HDL cholesterol from baseline after 24 weeks of treatment (i.e., HDL cholesterol at week 24 minus HDL cholesterol at week 0). HDL measured as mmol/L. (NCT00375492)
Timeframe: baseline, Week 24

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Group A (Exenatide)0.02
Group B (Placebo)0.02

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 24

Change in HbA1c from baseline (Week 0) after 24 weeks of treatment (i.e., HbA1c at week 24 minus HbA1c at week 0). HbA1c is measured as percent (%) of hemoglobin. (NCT00375492)
Timeframe: baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercent hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Group A (Exenatide)-1.21
Group B (Placebo)-0.73

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Weight

Change in body weight from baseline (Week 0) after 24 weeks of treatment (i.e., weight at week 24 minus weight at week 0). Body weight measured in kilograms (k). (NCT00375492)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Group A (Exenatide)-6.16
Group B (Placebo)-3.97

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 6-point Self Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Profile at Week 24

Change in SMBG at each of 6 time points throughout a day (blood glucose measurements before and 2 hours after the start of the morning, mid-day, and evening meals); week 24 compared to week 0 (i.e., SMBG at week 24 minus SMBG at week 0). Fasting Glucose measured in millimoles per liter (mmol/L). (NCT00375492)
Timeframe: baseline, Week 24

,
Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Morning Pre-Meal2 Hours Post Morning MealMidday Pre-Meal2 Hours Post Midday MealEvening Pre-Meal2 Hours Post Evening Meal
Group A (Exenatide)-1.87-2.67-1.40-2.12-1.57-3.09
Group B (Placebo)-1.20-1.92-1.37-1.51-1.32-2.28

[back to top]

Ratio of Triglycerides at Week 24 to Triglycerides at Baseline

Ratio of triglyceride levels at Week 24 to triglyceride levels at baseline, Week 0 (ie., triglycerides at Week 24 divided by triglycerides at baseline, Week 0). Triglycerides measured in mmol/L. (NCT00375492)
Timeframe: baseline, Week 24

InterventionRatio (Geometric Mean)
Group A (Exenatide)0.83
Group B (Placebo)0.92

[back to top]

Ratio of Homeostatic Model Assessment-Insulin Sensitivity (HOMA-S) at Week 24 to HOMA-S at Baseline

Ratio of HOMA-S at Week 24 to HOMA-S at baseline, week 0. HOMA-S is a computer solved model used to predict the homeostatic concentrations which arise from varying degrees of insulin sensitivity. HOMA-S allows a quantitative assessment of the contributions of insulin sensitivity to the fasting hyperglycemia. HOMA-S is measured as a percent of the normal population (normal insulin sensitivity = 100%, which is used as a reference in the calculation). The higher the percent the better for the participant. (NCT00375492)
Timeframe: baseline, Week 24

InterventionRatio (Geometric Mean)
Group A (Exenatide)1.08
Group B (Placebo)0.97

[back to top]

Ratio of Homeostatic Model Assessment-Beta Cell (HOMA-B) at Week 24 to HOMA-B at Baseline

Ratio of HOMA-B at Week 24 to HOMA-B at baseline (Week 0). HOMA-B is a computer solved model used to predict the homeostatic concentrations which arise from varying degrees beta-cell deficiency. HOMA-B allows a quantitative assessment of the contributions of deficient beta cell function to the fasting hyperglycemia. HOMA-B is measured as a percent of the normal population (normal beta cell function = 100%, which is used as a reference in the calculation). The higher the percent the better for the participant. (NCT00375492)
Timeframe: baseline, Week 24

InterventionRatio (Geometric Mean)
Group A (Exenatide)1.46
Group B (Placebo)1.29

[back to top]

Rate of Hypoglycemic Events

Overall rate of hypoglycemia, adjusted for 1 year (ie., events of hypoglycemia per participant per year). (NCT00375492)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionevents per patient per year (Least Squares Mean)
Group A (Exenatide)7.14
Group B (Placebo)4.58

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hypoglycemic Events During the Study

Number of participants experiencing one or more events of hypoglycemia at any point in the study (NCT00375492)
Timeframe: Baseline to 24 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Group A (Exenatide)33
Group B (Placebo)30

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol at Week 24

Change in LDL cholesterol from baseline (Week 0) after 24 weeks of treatment (ie., LDL cholesterol at week 24 minus LDL cholesterol at week 0). LDL cholesterol measured in mmol/L (NCT00375492)
Timeframe: baseline, Week 24

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Group A (Exenatide)-0.06
Group B (Placebo)-0.04

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference at Week 24

Change in waist circumference from baseline after 24 weeks of treatment (i.e., waist circumference at week 24 minus waist circumference at week 0). Waist measured in centimeters (cm). (NCT00375492)
Timeframe: baseline, Week 24

Interventioncm (Least Squares Mean)
Group A (Exenatide)-5.33
Group B (Placebo)-4.18

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Week 24

Change in total cholesterol from baseline after 24 weeks of treatment (i.e., total cholesterol at week 24 minus total cholesterol at week 0). Total cholesterol measured in mmol/L. (NCT00375492)
Timeframe: baseline, week 24

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Group A (Exenatide)-0.16
Group B (Placebo)-0.03

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight

Change in body weight from baseline after 26 weeks of treatment (i.e., body weight at week 26 minus body weight at week 0) (NCT00434954)
Timeframe: Baseline and 26 weeks

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Twice Daily-4.10
Premixed Insulin Aspart Twice Daily1.02

[back to top]

Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)

Change in BMI from baseline after 26 weeks of treatment (i.e., BMI at week 26 minus BMI at week 0) (NCT00434954)
Timeframe: Baseline and 26 weeks

Interventionkg/m^2 (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Twice Daily-1.39
Premixed Insulin Aspart Twice Daily0.32

[back to top]

Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

Change in HbA1c from baseline after 26 weeks of treatment (i.e., HbA1c at week 26 minus HbA1c at week 0) (NCT00434954)
Timeframe: Baseline and 26 weeks

InterventionPercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Twice Daily-1.00
Premixed Insulin Aspart Twice Daily-1.14

[back to top]

Incidence of Nocturnal Hypoglycemia (Percentage of Subjects Who Experienced at Least One Episode of Nocturnal Hypoglycemia During the 26 Week Treatment Period)

Risk for first nocturnal (night-time) hypoglycemic episode to occur up to week 26 (percentage of subjects who experienced at least one episode of nocturnal hypoglycemia during the 26 week treatment period) [i.e., number of subjects who experienced nocturnal hypoglycemia divided by total number of subjects times 100%]. (NCT00434954)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Exenatide Twice Daily3.9
Premixed Insulin Aspart Twice Daily7.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Target of < 6.5%

Percentage of subjects achieving HbA1c target of < 6.5% at the end of study (week 26) [i.e., number of subjects who achieved HbA1c < 6.5% divided by total number of subjects times 100%]. (NCT00434954)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Exenatide Twice Daily27.6
Premixed Insulin Aspart Twice Daily24.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Target of < 7.0%

Percentage of subjects achieving HbA1c target of < 7.0% at the end of study (week 26) [i.e., number of subjects who achieved HbA1c < 7.0% divided by total number of subjects times 100%]. (NCT00434954)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Exenatide Twice Daily49.2
Premixed Insulin Aspart Twice Daily56.6

[back to top]

7 Point Self-monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Profiles

7-point self-monitored blood glucose profiles at baseline and the end of the study, measured at 7 times during the day (pre-breakfast, 2 hours post-breakfast, pre-lunch, 2 hours post-lunch, pre-dinner, 2 hours post-dinner, and 3:00am). (NCT00434954)
Timeframe: Baseline and 26 weeks

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Pre-breakfast at baseline (week 0)Pre-breakfast at endpoint (week 26)2 hrs post-breakfast at baseline (week 0)2 hrs post-breakfast at endpoint (week 26)Pre-lunch at baseline (week 0)Pre-lunch at endpoint (week 26)2 hrs post-lunch at baseline (week 0)2 hrs post-lunch at endpoint (week 26)Pre-dinner at baseline (week 0)Pre-dinner at endpoint (week 26)2 hrs post-dinner at baseline (week 0)2 hrs post-dinner at endpoint (week 26)3:00 am at baseline (week 0)3:00 am at endpoint (week 26)
Exenatide Twice Daily8.9337.77410.8218.0148.4437.5069.6988.5138.6847.61610.2417.7278.3237.518
Premixed Insulin Aspart Twice Daily9.0057.29310.9028.3048.3576.6569.8998.2168.7597.19410.2598.1438.4756.999

[back to top]

Blood Lipid Levels

Total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (calculated), and triglyceride levels at baseline (week 0) and the end of the study (week 26) (NCT00434954)
Timeframe: Baseline and 26 weeks

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Total cholesterol at baseline (week 0)Total cholesterol at endpoint (week 26)HDL cholesterol at baseline (week 0)HDL cholesterol at endpoint (week 26)LDL cholesterol (calculated) at baseline (week 0)LDL cholesterol (calculated) at endpoint (week 26)Triglycerides at baseline (week 0)Triglycerides at endpoint (week 26)
Exenatide Twice Daily5.1474.9711.2341.2442.8452.7382.3912.234
Premixed Insulin Aspart Twice Daily5.0845.0501.2551.3192.7682.8522.4102.006

[back to top]

Incidence of Hypoglycemia (Percentage of Participants With at Least One Hypoglycemic Episode)

Risk for first hypoglycemic episode (blood glucose <=3.9 mmol/L or severe episode) to occur up to week 26 (NCT00434954)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Exenatide Twice Daily8.0
Premixed Insulin Aspart Twice Daily20.5

[back to top]

Patient Reported Outcomes: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)

Total DTSQ treatment satisfaction score at baseline (week 0) and after 26 weeks of treatment (LOCF). Total DTSQ treatment satisfaction score is derived as sum score of the individual components 1 and 4-8 of the DTSQ questionnaire. Each component is scored on a scale of 0 (worst case) to 6 (best case). Higher values represent higher treatment satisfaction. (NCT00434954)
Timeframe: Baseline and 26 weeks

,
Interventionscores on DTSQ scale (Mean)
DTSQ score at baseline (week 0)DTSQ score at endpoint (week 26)
Exenatide Twice Daily29.530.6
Premixed Insulin Aspart Twice Daily29.729.3

[back to top]

Patient Reported Outcomes: Quality of Life (SF-12)

SF-12 Physical and Mental Component Summary Scores at baseline (week 0) and after 26 weeks of treatment (LOCF). SF-12 Physical and Mental Component Summary Scores are normalized scores ranging from 0 (worst case) to 100 (best case), and are derived from responses to 12 questions. Scores > 50 indicate an above-average health status. (NCT00434954)
Timeframe: Baseline and 26 weeks

,
Interventionscores on SF-12 scale (Mean)
Physical Component at baseline (week 0)Physical Component at endpoint (week 26)Mental Component at baseline (week 0)Mental Component at endpoint (week 26)
Exenatide Twice Daily35.539.131.331.1
Premixed Insulin Aspart Twice Daily36.337.728.329.6

[back to top]

Incidence of Hypoglycemic Episodes [Blood Glucose <= 3.0 mmol/L or Severe] (Percentage of Subjects Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-emergent Hypoglycemic Episode During the 26-week Treatment Period)

Risk for the first hypoglycemic episode to occur up to Week 26 (percentage of subjects who experienced at least one treatment-emergent hypoglycemic episode during the 26-week treatment period)[ i.e., number of subjects experiencing at least one hypoglycemic episode divided by total number of subjects times 100%] (NCT00434954)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Exenatide Twice Daily1.8
Premixed Insulin Aspart Twice Daily6.3

[back to top]

Mean Plasma Glucose Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Blood Glucose Concentration in the Exenatide 1.25 mcg or Exenatide 2.5 mcg Treated Groups Along With Insulin, Compared to Insulin Alone

Post-prandial blood glucose concentration in terms of mean AUC (0-120 min) was determined in subjects treated with either Exenatide 1.25 mcg or Exenatide 2.5 along with insulin, compared to insulin alone, given as a single subcutaneous injection (NCT00456300)
Timeframe: 0-120 minutes post-dose

Interventionmmol*L/min (Mean)
Exenatide 1.25 mcg + Insulin49
Exenatide 2.5 mcg + Insulin44
Insulin Monotherapy379

[back to top]

Change in Two Hour Glucose

(NCT00456885)
Timeframe: 16 weeks from the start of each treatment period.

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Exenatide-10
Placebo-0.5

[back to top]

Change in Insulin

(NCT00456885)
Timeframe: 16 weeks from the start of each treatment period.

Interventionmicrounits per liter (Mean)
Exenatide1.1
Placebo0.4

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Glucose

(NCT00456885)
Timeframe: 16 weeks from the start of each treatment period.

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Exenatide0.5
Placebo3.1

[back to top]

Change in Body Mass Index

(NCT00456885)
Timeframe: 16 weeks from the start of each treatment period.

InterventionKg/m^2 (Mean)
Exenatide-0.93
Placebo0.18

[back to top]

Adiponectin

(NCT00456885)
Timeframe: 16 weeks after the beginning of each treatment

Interventionmicrogram per ml (Mean)
Exenatide0.4
Placebo0.07

[back to top]

Changes in Body Composition

Per cent body body fat was assessed using bio-electrical impedance with a BIA; RJL System Quantum II Bioelectrical Body Composition Analyzer. The data is reported as per cent body fat. (NCT00456885)
Timeframe: 16 weeks after the beginning of each treatment

Interventionper cent (Mean)
Exenatide-0.4
Placebo-0.7

[back to top]

Change in Waist Circumference

(NCT00456885)
Timeframe: 16 weeks from the start of each treatment period.

Interventioncentimeters (Mean)
Exenatide-1.68
Placebo0.94

[back to top]

Systolic Blood Pressure

Blood pressure was measured using a Dynamap automated monitoring device. The change is reported as the blood pressure measured at the beginning of the treatment group and after 16 weeks. We are reporting the change in the systolic blood presssure recorded. (NCT00456885)
Timeframe: 16 weeks after the beginning of each treatment

Interventionmm of mercury (Mean)
Exenatide-2.5
Placebo-1.3

[back to top]

REE

Resting Energy Expenditure (NCT00456885)
Timeframe: 16 weeks from the start of each treatment period.

InterventionKilocalories (Mean)
Exenatide-13.7
Placebo6.5

[back to top]

HOMA Score

(NCT00456885)
Timeframe: 16 weeks from the start of each treatment period.

InterventionRatio fasting glucose to insulin (Mean)
Exenatide0.2
Placebo0.2

[back to top]

Diastolic Blood Pressure

(NCT00456885)
Timeframe: 16 weeks after the beginning of each treatment

Interventionmm of mercury (Mean)
Exenatide-1.2
Placebo-0.4

[back to top]

Changes in Leptin

(NCT00456885)
Timeframe: 16 weeks from the start of each treatment period.

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Exenatide-3.7
Placebo-0.2

[back to top]

Change in Weight

Change in weight at the end of each treatment period. (NCT00456885)
Timeframe: 16 weeks after the beginning of each treatment

Interventionkilograms (Mean)
Exenatide-2.49
Placebo0.43

[back to top]

Change in Total Cholesterol

Change in total cholesterol from baseline after 24 weeks of treatment (i.e., total cholesterol at week 24 minus total cholesterol at week 0) (NCT00500370)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,
Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (Week 0)Change at Endpoint (Week 24)
Group A (Exenatide)4.870.19
Group B (Placebo)4.880.33

[back to top]

Change in Serum Glucose AUC Levels Following Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT)

Change in serum glucose AUC following OGTT (week 24 compared to week 0) (i.e., serum glucose AUC at week 24 minus serum glucose AUC at week 0) (NCT00500370)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,
Intervention(mmol*hr)/L (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (Week 0)Change at Endpoint (Week 24)
Group A (Exenatide)15.73-0.47
Group B (Placebo)15.19-0.01

[back to top]

Change in Waist-to-hip Ratio

Waist-to-hip ratio at week 24 compared to waist-to-hip ratio at week 0 (i.e., waist-to-hip ratio at week 24 minus waist-to-hip ratio at week 0). Waist-to-hip ratio equals waist circumference at given time point divided by hip circumference at given timepoint. (NCT00500370)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,
InterventionRatio (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (Week 0)Change at Endpoint (Week 24)
Group A (Exenatide)0.90-0.001
Group B (Placebo)0.900.002

[back to top]

Incidence of Patients That Demonstrate Normalization of Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) and/or Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT)

Number of patients in each treatment group that demonstrate normalization of IFG and/or IGT by week 24 (NCT00500370)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Group A (Exenatide)13
Group B (Placebo)9

[back to top]

Incidence of Patients That Demonstrate Overt Signs of Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosis

Number of patients in each treatment group that demonstrate overt signs of diabetes mellitus diagnosis by week 24 (NCT00500370)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Group A (Exenatide)3
Group B (Placebo)2

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Experiencing >=5% Weight Loss

Percentage of exenatide and placebo treated patients experiencing >=5% weight loss after 24 weeks of treatment (i.e., [weight at week 0 minus weight at week 24] divided by weight at week 0 times 100% >=5%) (NCT00500370)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Group A (Exenatide)31.5
Group B (Placebo)16.5

[back to top]

Ratio of Endpoint (LOCF) to Baseline for Fasting Triglycerides (Logarithmically Transformed)

Ratio of triglycerides at week 24 compared to triglycerides at week 0 (i.e., triglycerides at week 24 divided by triglycerides at week 0) (NCT00500370)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionRatio (Least Squares Mean)
Group A (Exenatide)0.99
Group B (Placebo)0.96

[back to top]

Ratio of Endpoint (LOCF) to Baseline for Homeostatic Model Assessment-Insulin Sensitivity (HOMA-S) (Logarithmically Transformed)

Ratio of HOMA-S at week 24 to HOMA-S at week 0 (i.e., HOMA-S at week 24 divided by HOMA-S at week 0). HOMA-S is a measure of insulin sensitivity. (NCT00500370)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionRatio (Least Squares Mean)
Group A (Exenatide)0.92
Group B (Placebo)0.91

[back to top]

Ratio of Endpoint (LOCF) to Baseline for Homeostatic Model Assessment-Beta Cell (HOMA-B) (Logarithmically Transformed)

Ratio of HOMA-B at week 24 to HOMA-B at week 0 (i.e., HOMA-B at week 24 divided by HOMA-B at week 0). HOMA-B is a measure of beta cell function. (NCT00500370)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionRatio (Least Squares Mean)
Group A (Exenatide)1.06
Group B (Placebo)1.08

[back to top]

Change in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol

Change in LDL cholesterol from baseline following 24 weeks of treatment (i.e., LDL cholesterol at week 24 minus LDL cholesterol at week 0) (NCT00500370)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,
Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (Week 0)Change at Endpoint (Week 24)
Group A (Exenatide)2.860.20
Group B (Placebo)2.790.34

[back to top]

Change in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)

Change in hsCRP levels from baseline following 24 weeks of treatment (i.e., hsCRP at week 24 minus hsCRP at week 0) (NCT00500370)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,
Interventionpmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (Week 0)Change at Endpoint (Week 24)
Group A (Exenatide)8.61-1.31
Group B (Placebo)8.03-0.44

[back to top]

Change in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol

Change in HDL cholesterol from baseline after 24 weeks of treatment (i.e., HDL cholesterol at week 24 minus HDL cholesterol at week 0) (NCT00500370)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,
Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (Week 0)Change at Endpoint (Week 24)
Group A (Exenatide)1.270.004
Group B (Placebo)1.360.06

[back to top]

Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

Change in HbA1c from baseline following 24 weeks of treatment (i.e., HbA1c at week 24 minus HbA1c at week 0) (NCT00500370)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,
Interventionpercent (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (Week 0)Change at Endpoint (Week 24)
Group A (Exenatide)5.61-0.003
Group B (Placebo)5.580.09

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Serum Glucose

Change in fasting serum glucose from baseline following 24 weeks of treatment (i.e., fasting serum glucose at week 24 minus fasting serum glucose at week 0) (NCT00500370)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,
Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (Week 0)Change at Endpoint (Week 24)
Group A (Exenatide)5.370.000
Group B (Placebo)5.37-0.02

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight

Change in body weight from baseline after 24 weeks of treatment (i.e., body weight at week 24 minus body weight at week 0) (NCT00500370)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,
Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (Week 0)Change at Endpoint (Week 24)
Group A (Exenatide)109.48-5.06
Group B (Placebo)107.64-1.61

[back to top]

Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)

Change in BMI from baseline after 24 weeks of treatment (i.e., BMI at week 24 minus BMI at week 0) (NCT00500370)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,
Interventionkg/m^2 (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (Week 0)Change at Endpoint (Week 24)
Group A (Exenatide)39.64-1.83
Group B (Placebo)39.39-0.58

[back to top]

Treatment-emergent Antibody Status (Maximum Titer Level Experienced)

Patients who experienced specified treatment-emergent antibody status at any point during the study (grouped by maximum titer level experienced) (NCT00516048)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Antibody negativeLow titer antibodiesHigher titer antibodies
Enrolled But Withdrew Before Receiving Treatment000
Exenatide: Treatment-Emergent Antibody Positive02517
Exenatide:Treatment-Emergent Antibody Negative1500

[back to top] [back to top]

Change in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) From Baseline to Endpoint

Change in HbA1c from baseline (Week 0) to endpoint (Week 24) by treatment-emergent antibody status (NCT00516048)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,,
Interventionpercent (Mean)
Baseline HbA1c (Week 0)Change in HbA1c at endpoint (Week 24)
Enrolled But Withdrew Before Receiving Treatment00
Exenatide: Treatment-Emergent Antibody Positive8.05-0.30
Exenatide:Treatment-Emergent Antibody Negative8.13-1.03

[back to top]

Change in Nighttime (2400-0600) Heart Rate From Baseline to Endpoint

Change from baseline to endpoint in nighttime (2400-0600) heart rate as measured by an ambulatory blood pressure monitor (NCT00516074)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,
Interventionbeats per minute (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (Week 0)Change at endpoint (Week 12)
Exenatide BID71.541.43
Placebo71.77-0.28

[back to top]

Change in Mean 24-hour Heart Rate From Baseline to Endpoint

Change from baseline to endpoint in average heart rate measured over 24 hours by an ambulatory blood pressure monitor. (NCT00516074)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,
Interventionbeats per minute (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (Week 0)Change at endpoint (Week 12)
Exenatide BID74.832.14
Placebo74.47-0.71

[back to top]

Change in Mean 24 Hour Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Endpoint

Change from baseline to endpoint in average systolic blood pressure measured over 24 hours by an ambulatory blood pressure monitor (NCT00516074)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (Week 0)Change at endpoint (Week 12)
Exenatide BID126.61-0.81
Placebo119.93-0.34

[back to top]

Change in Mean 24 Hour Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Endpoint

Change from baseline to endpoint in average diastolic blood pressure measured over 24 hours by an ambulatory blood pressure monitor (NCT00516074)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (Week 0)Change at endpoint (Week 12)
Exenatide BID75.70-0.60
Placebo70.54-2.34

[back to top]

Change in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) From Baseline to Endpoint

Change from baseline to endpoint in HbA1c (NCT00516074)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,
Interventionpercent (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (Week 0)Change at endpoint (Week 12)
Exenatide BID7.50-0.15
Placebo7.110.12

[back to top]

Change in Daytime Heart Rate From Baseline to Endpoint

Change from baseline to endpoint in daytime heart rate as measured by an ambulatory blood pressure monitor (NCT00516074)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,
Interventionbeats per minute (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline (Week 0)Change at endpoint (Week 12)
Exenatide BID75.972.35
Placebo75.37-0.87

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Achieved Target Values for HbA1c <6.5% and >=6.5% to <7% at Weeks 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 15, and 16

The number of participants who achieved target values for HbA1c (i.e., HbA1c <6.5% and >=6.5% to <7%) were assessed. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data, in which the last valid observation recorded on treatment (scheduled or unscheduled) was used to impute the missing measurement. For participants who had missing observations before their last observation on treatment, the closest previous non-missing on-treatment observation was carried forward to missing visits. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. (NCT00518115)
Timeframe: Weeks (W) 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 15, and 16

,,,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
W4: <6.5%, n=47,34,33,34,28,29,31,34,34,30W4: >=6.5% to <7%, n=47,34,33,34,28,29,31,34,34,30W5: <6.5%, n=49,34,34,34,29,30,32,34,35,31W5: >=6.5% to <7%, n=49,34,34,34,29,30,32,34,35,31W7: <6.5%, n=50,34,34,34,29,30,32,34,35,32W7: >=6.5% to <7%, n=50,34,34,34,29,30,32,34,35,32W8: <6.5%, n=50,34,34,34,29,30,32,34,35,32W8: >=6.5% to <7%, n=50,34,34,34,29,30,32,34,35,32W9: <6.5%, n=50,34,34,34,29,30,32,34,35,32W9: >=6.5% to <7%, n=50,34,34,34,29,30,32,34,35,32W12: <6.5%, n=50,34,34,34,29,30,32,34,35,33W12:>=6.5% to <7%, n=50,34,34,34,29,30,32,34,35,33W15: <6.5%, n=50,34,34,34,29,30,32,34,35,33W15:>=6.5% to <7%, n=50,34,34,34,29,30,32,34,35,33W16: <6.5%, n=50,34,34,34,29,30,32,34,35,33W16:>=6.5% to <7%, n=50,34,34,34,29,30,32,34,35,33
Albiglutide 100 mg Every 4 Weeks364125851198789788
Albiglutide 15 mg Bi-weekly06151919110374753
Albiglutide 15 mg Weekly1827444867584848
Albiglutide 30 mg Bi-weekly081931141231131368412
Albiglutide 30 mg Weekly484885688511587105
Albiglutide 4 mg Weekly0515141625242533
Albiglutide 50 mg Bi-weekly3521169710710811109108
Albiglutide 50 mg Every 4 Weeks1617282429293835
Exenatide BID0507192729384648
Placebo18241911039373828

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin at Weeks 5, 8, 12, and 16

Fasting insulin levels were measured after the participant had not eaten (fasted) for at least eight hours prior to the sampling. The Baseline insulin value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in insulin was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last valid observation recorded on treatment (scheduled or unscheduled) was used to impute the missing measurement. For participants who had missing observations before their last observation on treatment, the closest previous non-missing on-treatment observation was carried forward to missing visits. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. (NCT00518115)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 5, 8, 12, and 16

,,,,,,,,,
InterventionPicomoles per liter (pmol/L) (Mean)
Week 5, n=47,31,32,33,27,28,31,30,33,30Week 8, n=49,32,33,34,28,29,32,31,33,31Week 12, n=49,32,33,34,28,29,32,31,33,33Week 16, n=49,32,33,34,28,29,32,31,33,33
Albiglutide 100 mg Every 4 Weeks36.26.611.618.4
Albiglutide 15 mg Bi-weekly28.518.617.821.9
Albiglutide 15 mg Weekly-16.4-8.5-7.9-19.9
Albiglutide 30 mg Bi-weekly-38.3-14.4-26.1-24.0
Albiglutide 30 mg Weekly0.42.4-1.125.1
Albiglutide 4 mg Weekly-12.4-16.5-12.42.9
Albiglutide 50 mg Bi-weekly-8.4-16.80.2-17.4
Albiglutide 50 mg Every 4 Weeks11.112.938.012.9
Exenatide BID29.65.418.017.4
Placebo5.19.28.8-5.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 15, and 16

The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for at least eight hours prior to the sampling. The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in FPG was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last valid observation recorded on treatment (scheduled or unscheduled) was used to impute the missing measurement. For participants who had missing observations before their last observation on treatment, the closest previous non-missing on-treatment observation was carried forward to missing visits. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. (NCT00518115)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 15, and 16

,,,,,,,,,
InterventionMillimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Mean)
Week 4, n=47,33,32,32,29,28,32,32,34,32Week 5, n=47,33,32,32,29,28,32,32,34,32Week 7, n=47,33,32,32,29,28,32,32,34,33Week 8, n=47,33,32,32,29,28,32,32,34,33Week 9, n=47,33,32,32,29,28,32,32,34,33Week 12, n=47,33,32,32,29,28,32,32,34,33Week 15, n=47,33,32,32,29,28,32,32,34,33Week 16, n=47,33,32,32,29,28,32,32,34,33
Albiglutide 100 mg Every 4 Weeks-0.61-2.12-1.07-1.29-2.25-1.50-1.27-1.22
Albiglutide 15 mg Bi-weekly-1.06-1.41-1.16-1.29-1.29-1.11-1.45-1.28
Albiglutide 15 mg Weekly-0.58-1.05-0.13-0.80-0.71-0.70-0.70-0.72
Albiglutide 30 mg Bi-weekly-0.97-1.72-1.51-1.27-1.64-1.57-1.71-1.58
Albiglutide 30 mg Weekly-1.39-1.53-1.54-1.60-1.49-1.85-1.54-1.44
Albiglutide 4 mg Weekly-0.99-1.02-0.80-1.22-1.13-1.04-0.67-0.47
Albiglutide 50 mg Bi-weekly-1.35-2.17-1.87-1.29-1.68-1.49-1.66-1.32
Albiglutide 50 mg Every 4 Weeks-0.14-1.55-0.41-0.66-1.48-0.49-0.79-0.72
Exenatide BID-1.11-1.06-1.25-1.43-1.54-1.32-1.27-0.80
Placebo-0.40-0.40-0.19-0.44-0.25-0.27-0.44-0.10

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Functional Living Index - Emesis (FLIE) Scores at Week 16

The FLIE questionnaire is used to record the participant's feelings/opinions concerning the effects of nausea/vomiting on their quality of life during the past five days. Participants completed the questionnaire by responding to 18 questions. The first set of 9 questions refer to nausea, and the second set of 9 questions refer to vomiting. Each question is scored on a seven-point visual analog scale (1 to 7). On this scale, a score of 1 corresponds to 0 millimeters (mm), and a score of 7 correspond to 100 mm. Anything in between is marked at the appropriate point on the scale and is measured in mm. Data are reported in mm in this table. In FLIE questions (FLIEQ) 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, and 17, a score of 1 indicates no effect on the quality of life, and a score of 7 indicates a great effect on the quality of life. In FLIEQ 3, 6, 11, 15, and 18, a score of 1 indicates a great effect on the quality of life, and a score of 7 indicates no effect on the quality of life. (NCT00518115)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

,,,,,,,,,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
FLIEQ1FLIEQ2FLIEQ3FLIEQ4FLIEQ5FLIEQ6FLIEQ7FLIEQ8FLIEQ9FLIEQ10FLIEQ11FLIEQ12FLIEQ13FLIEQ14FLIEQ15FLIEQ16FLIEQ17FLIEQ18
Albiglutide 100 mg Every 4 Weeks-2.8-0.27.3-1.8-1.43.9-1.9-2.3-3.2-2.04.0-0.8-2.1-2.14.0-1.5-0.66.9
Albiglutide 15 mg Bi-weekly8.65.910.35.60.210.25.710.15.64.57.95.39.85.35.68.24.510.1
Albiglutide 15 mg Weekly1.02.6-4.0-2.8-1.8-0.51.5-1.0-0.5-1.6-0.5-0.8-2.2-1.4-4.9-1.4-1.2-3.2
Albiglutide 30 mg Bi-weekly-1.0-0.83.9-1.6-1.34.2-1.0-0.7-0.7-0.33.6-0.2-0.3-0.13.5-0.1-0.27.1
Albiglutide 30 mg Weekly4.63.018.61.52.920.00.22.62.3-0.121.91.81.01.819.7-0.5-1.214.9
Albiglutide 4 mg Weekly5.75.510.36.46.49.45.75.75.35.813.86.46.36.414.26.36.314.2
Albiglutide 50 mg Bi-weekly8.24.718.25.94.518.04.96.24.04.318.34.44.34.318.44.54.318.5
Albiglutide 50 mg Every 4 Weeks-0.3-0.64.5-1.91.55.6-0.1-0.4-0.10.27.2-0.40.0-0.11.50.9-1.15.7
Exenatide BID-4.4-3.57.8-3.5-4.03.6-3.1-3.5-3.4-4.93.3-3.1-4.0-4.17.0-3.8-4.16.9
Placebo-0.10.215.60.4-0.311.20.4-0.6-0.1-0.315.30.10.1-0.315.5-0.40.118.1

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 16

The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in body weight was calculated as the value at Week 16 minus the value at Baseline. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the ([value at Week 16 minus the Baseline value] divided by the Baseline value) multiplied by 100. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last valid observation recorded on treatment (scheduled or unscheduled) was used to impute the missing measurement. For participants who had missing observations before their last observation on treatment, the closest previous non-missing on-treatment observation was carried forward to missing visits. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. (NCT00518115)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Placebo-0.72
Exenatide BID-2.53
Albiglutide 4 mg Weekly-0.94
Albiglutide 15 mg Weekly-1.04
Albiglutide 30 mg Weekly-1.59
Albiglutide 15 mg Bi-weekly-1.97
Albiglutide 30 mg Bi-weekly-1.69
Albiglutide 50 mg Bi-weekly-1.32
Albiglutide 50 mg Every 4 Weeks-1.37
Albiglutide 100 mg Every 4 Weeks-1.89

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 15, and 16

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in HbA1c was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the value at Baseline. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data, in which the last valid observation recorded on treatment (scheduled or unscheduled) was used to impute the missing measurement. For participants who had missing observations before their last observation on treatment, the closest previous non-missing on-treatment observation was carried forward to missing visits. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. (NCT00518115)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 15, and 16

,,,,,,,,,
InterventionPercentage of HbA1c in the blood (Mean)
Week 4, n=47,34,33,34,28,29,31,34,34,30Week 5, n=49,34,34,34,29,30,32,34,35,31Week 7, n=50,34,34,34,29,30,32,34,35,32Week 8, n=50,34,34,34,29,30,32,34,35,32Week 9, n=50,34,34,34,29,30,32,34,35,32Week 12, n=50,34,34,34,29,30,32,34,35,33Week 15, n=50,34,34,34,29,30,32,34,35,33Week 16, n=50,34,34,34,29,30,32,34,35,33
Albiglutide 100 mg Every 4 Weeks-0.42-0.65-0.63-0.68-0.82-0.84-0.88-0.87
Albiglutide 15 mg Bi-weekly-0.35-0.42-0.52-0.54-0.56-0.59-0.61-0.56
Albiglutide 15 mg Weekly-0.33-0.39-0.44-0.50-0.55-0.58-0.49-0.49
Albiglutide 30 mg Bi-weekly-0.34-0.510.64-0.67-0.71-0.71-0.79-0.79
Albiglutide 30 mg Weekly-0.56-0.62-0.79-0.77-0.85-0.96-0.86-0.87
Albiglutide 4 mg Weekly-0.12-0.16-0.19-0.24-0.19-0.18-0.19-0.11
Albiglutide 50 mg Bi-weekly-0.45-0.58-0.68-0.71-0.77-0.79-0.80-0.79
Albiglutide 50 mg Every 4 Weeks-0.41-0.47-0.45-0.41-0.54-0.51-0.58-0.55
Exenatide BID-0.23-0.32-0.36-0.45-0.51-0.56-0.53-0.54
Placebo-0.14-0.09-0.15-0.17-0.21-0.19-0.27-0.17

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting C-peptide at Weeks 5, 8, 12, and 16

Fasting C-peptide levels were measured after the participant had not eaten (fasted) for at least eight hours prior to the sampling. The Baseline C-peptide value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in C-peptide was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last valid observation recorded on treatment (scheduled or unscheduled) was used to impute the missing measurement. For participants who had missing observations before their last observation on treatment, the closest previous non-missing on-treatment observation was carried forward to missing visits. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. (NCT00518115)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 5, 8, 12, and 16

,,,,,,,,,
InterventionNanomoles per liter (nmol/L) (Mean)
Week 5, n=48,33,32,33,27,28,32,33,35,30Week 8, n=50,34,33,34,28,29,32,33,35,31Week 12, n=50,34,33,34,28,29,32,33,35,33Week 16, n=50,34,33,34,28,29,32,33,35,33
Albiglutide 100 mg Every 4 Weeks0.2300.0070.062-0.005
Albiglutide 15 mg Bi-weekly0.015-0.038-0.098-0.059
Albiglutide 15 mg Weekly-0.034-0.026-0.046-0.075
Albiglutide 30 mg Bi-weekly-0.128-0.015-0.153-0.137
Albiglutide 30 mg Weekly0.0890.0950.0230.171
Albiglutide 4 mg Weekly-0.020-0.073-0.044-0.051
Albiglutide 50 mg Bi-weekly0.004-0.062-0.076-0.066
Albiglutide 50 mg Every 4 Weeks0.0720.0310.1550.076
Exenatide BID0.2740.1040.1740.216
Placebo0.004-0.019-0.092-0.091

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Fructosamine at Weeks 5, 8, 12, and 16

Fasting fructosamine levels were measured after the participant had not eaten (fasted) for at least eight hours prior to the sampling. The Baseline fructosamine value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in fructosamine was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last valid observation recorded on treatment (scheduled or unscheduled) was used to impute the missing measurement. For participants who had missing observations before their last observation on treatment, the closest previous non-missing on-treatment observation was carried forward to missing visits. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. (NCT00518115)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 5, 8, 12, and 16

,,,,,,,,,
InterventionMicromoles per liter (µmol/L) (Mean)
Week 5, n=48,34,32,33,28,29,32,34,35,29Week 8, n=50,34,33,34,28,29,32,34,35,31Week 12, n=50,34,33,34,28,29,32,34,35,33Week 16, n=50,34,33,34,28,29,32,34,35,33
Albiglutide 100 mg Every 4 Weeks-32.5-29.5-31.1-24.9
Albiglutide 15 mg Bi-weekly-21.3-28.9-25.2-23.0
Albiglutide 15 mg Weekly-23.8-25.7-26.7-18.2
Albiglutide 30 mg Bi-weekly-34.4-40.9-40.2-38.1
Albiglutide 30 mg Weekly-30.7-35.5-31.8-30.8
Albiglutide 4 mg Weekly-11.9-13.1-12.5-7.8
Albiglutide 50 mg Bi-weekly-30.1-32.7-32.7-29.4
Albiglutide 50 mg Every 4 Weeks-29.2-24.9-26.4-26.5
Exenatide BID-24.7-30.6-30.1-24.6
Placebo-8.3-10.1-11.2-3.2

[back to top]

Mean Half-maximal Effective Concentration (EC50) of Albiglutide for HbA1c and FPG

EC50 is defined as the concentration of albiglutide that give a half-maximal HbA1c and FPG response. Samples were collected prior to the administration of study medication on dosing days (Weeks 0, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 15) and on the day of the clinic visit at Weeks 16, 17, 18, 20, 23, and 27. The Week 5, 8, and 12 post-dose (PK sampling was performed within 6 days of drug administration. EC50 estimates used PK data as well as HbA1c and FPG efficacy data. EC50 was estimated from an inhibitory Emax (maximal possible effect of albiglutide) model. (NCT00518115)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 15, 16, 17 18, 20, 23, and 27

Interventionnanograms per milliliter (Mean)
HbA1c, Treatment-naïve groupHbA1c, Prior monotherapy groupFPG
All Participants Receiving Any Dose of Albiglutide114012301970

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Glucagon at Weeks 5, 8, 12, and 16

Fasting glucagon levels were measured after the participant had not eaten (fasted) for at least eight hours prior to the sampling. The Baseline glucagon value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in glucagon was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last valid observation recorded on treatment (scheduled or unscheduled) was used to impute the missing measurement. For participants who had missing observations before their last observation on treatment, the closest previous non-missing on-treatment observation was carried forward to missing visits. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. (NCT00518115)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 5, 8, 12, and 16

,,,,,,,,,
InterventionNanograms per liter (ng/L) (Mean)
Week 5, n=48,33,33,33,27,28,32,34,35,30Week 8, n=50,34,34,34,28,29,32,34,35,31Week 12, n=50,34,34,34,28,29,32,34,35,33Week 16, n=50,34,34,34,28,29,32,34,35,33
Albiglutide 100 mg Every 4 Weeks1.90.5-2.1-4.7
Albiglutide 15 mg Bi-weekly-6.0-12.4-11.1-7.1
Albiglutide 15 mg Weekly-13.9-15.6-20.1-20.5
Albiglutide 30 mg Bi-weekly-7.6-3.10.2-5.0
Albiglutide 30 mg Weekly-3.6-2.4-4.5-2.6
Albiglutide 4 mg Weekly-3.2-5.6-8.6-3.9
Albiglutide 50 mg Bi-weekly-11.6-10.7-3.3-10.9
Albiglutide 50 mg Every 4 Weeks-9.3-0.3-3.7-11.5
Exenatide BID-3.9-14.8-5.5-4.5
Placebo3.86.90.1-2.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Response to Questions on the Hunger, Craving, and Fullness Questionnaire (HCFQ) at Week 16

"The HCFQ questionnaire is used to record how often participants have felt hungry or craved food, and how full participants felt after finishing meals, on average, in the past week. Participants answered the following seven questions with the response that best described their feelings of hunger, craving, and fullness: Q1, In the past week I was hungry; Q2, In the past week I thought about food; Q3, In the past week I wanted to eat; Q4, In the past week I ate more than I should have; Q5, In the past week, I craved specific food; Q6, In the past week when finished meals I felt full; Q7, In the past week when finished meals I felt satisfied." (NCT00518115)
Timeframe: Week 16

,,,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Q1: AlwaysQ1: OftenQ1: SometimesQ1: RarelyQ1: NeverQ2: AlwaysQ2: OftenQ2: SometimesQ2: RarelyQ2: NeverQ3: AlwaysQ3: OftenQ3: SometimesQ3: RarelyQ3: NeverQ4: Yes, definitelyQ4: Yes, probablyQ4: I don't knowQ4: Probably notQ4: Definitely notQ5: AlwaysQ5: OftenQ5: SometimesQ5: RarelyQ5: NeverQ6: Much too fullQ6: Very fullQ6: Comfortably fullQ6: Slightly hungryQ6: Very hungryQ7: Extremely satisfiedQ7: SatisfiedQ7: Neither satisfied nor dissatisfiedQ7: DissatisfiedQ7: Extremely dissatisfied
Albiglutide 100 mg Every 4 Weeks16122126112109111131224103883121720114520
Albiglutide 15 mg Bi-weekly238601310411410402924201783041320015310
Albiglutide 15 mg Weekly07144007135014182029194041344151720117520
Albiglutide 30 mg Bi-weekly251701361501441610212443261520142000222100
Albiglutide 30 mg Weekly06142007114017131029173211450031810119110
Albiglutide 4 mg Weekly021531021450041610082101025113031800117300
Albiglutide 50 mg Bi-weekly221142239433212222525703963121800115500
Albiglutide 50 mg Every 4 Weeks262020361641361740792102051195271821223410
Exenatide BID051771151941052050185124121584022800027300
Placebo152841142851372630415107312191610102630327900

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Triglycerides, Free Fatty Acids, Total Cholesterol, Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, and High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Weeks 5, 8, 12, and 16

Serum lipid components, including triglycerides (TG), free fatty acids (FFA), total cholesterol (CL), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), were measured at Baseline and Weeks 5, 8, 12, and 16. The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last valid observation recorded on treatment (scheduled or unscheduled) was used to impute the missing measurement. For participants who had missing observations before their last observation on treatment, the closest previous non-missing on-treatment observation was carried forward to missing visits. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. (NCT00518115)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 5, 8, 12, and 16

,,,,,,,,,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
TG, Week 5, n=45,31,34,31,27,29,31,34,35,30TG, Week 8, n=50,33,34,34,27,30,32,34,35,31TG, Week 12, n=50,34,34,34,28,30,32,34,35,33TG, Week 16, n=50,34,34,34,28,30,32,34,35,33FFA, Week 5, n=48,33,32,33,27,28,32,34,35,29FFA, Week 8, n=50,34,33,34,28,29,32,34,35,31FFA, Week 12, n=50,34,33,34,28,29,32,34,35,33FFA, Week 16, n=50,34,33,34,28,29,32,34,35,33Total CL, Week 5, n=45,31,34,31,27,29,31,34,35,30Total CL, Week 8, n=50,33,34,34,27,30,32,34,35,31Total CL, Week 12, n=50,34,34,34,28,30,32,34,35,33Total CL, Week 16, n=50,34,34,34,28,30,32,34,35,33LDL-C, Week 5, n=41,29,31,29,26,28,29,27,32,29LDL-C, Week 8, n=45,32,32,32,26,30,31,28,32,30LDL-C, Week 12, n=45,33,32,32,28,30,31,28,32,32LDL-C, Week 16, n=46,33,32,32,28,30,31,28,32,32HDL-C, Week 5, n=45,31,34,31,27,29,31,34,35,30HDL-C, Week 8, n=50,33,34,34,27,30,32,34,35,31HDL-C, Week 12, n=50,34,34,34,28,30,32,34,35,33HDL-C, Week 16, n=50,34,34,34,28,30,32,34,35,33
Albiglutide 100 mg Every 4 Weeks-0.184-0.0280.070-0.1140.0060.1750.1230.094-0.2450.0600.0150.018-0.0910.0540.0100.054-0.053-0.016-0.045-0.048
Albiglutide 15 mg Bi-weekly-0.266-0.219-0.380-0.2580.0250.0170.0100.034-0.372-0.172-0.190-0.225-0.285-0.160-0.034-0.123-0.038-0.018-0.018-0.015
Albiglutide 15 mg Weekly-0.376-0.408-0.341-0.296-0.008-0.048-0.0130.016-0.139-0.162-0.140-0.037-0.155-0.157-0.152-0.045-0.0100.019-0.019-0.010
Albiglutide 30 mg Bi-weekly-0.147-0.150-0.269-0.331-0.028-0.027-0.051-0.005-0.140-0.094-0.092-0.178-0.082-0.052-0.004-0.062-0.045-0.030-0.041-0.031
Albiglutide 30 mg Weekly0.112-0.0090.1060.0990.0140.0460.0430.050-0.1130.002-0.0200.009-0.0680.0890.0040.003-0.063-0.061-0.061-0.046
Albiglutide 4 mg Weekly0.3030.1780.2210.122-0.0320.0330.0220.020-0.153-0.060-0.025-0.032-0.294-0.132-0.096-0.1090.0010.0060.004-0.007
Albiglutide 50 mg Bi-weekly-1.423-1.494-1.539-1.469-0.012-0.0040.0110.025-0.451-0.418-0.338-0.4470.0260.0530.1560.059-0.076-0.050-0.029-0.065
Albiglutide 50 mg Every 4 Weeks-0.725-0.175-0.362-0.426-0.0010.055-0.0300.012-0.407-0.183-0.134-0.217-0.106-0.087-0.061-0.088-0.047-0.054-0.033-0.033
Exenatide BID-0.068-0.2380.094-0.149-0.038-0.045-0.007-0.031-0.239-0.1820.054-0.031-0.153-0.0140.1050.096-0.047-0.058-0.003-0.025
Placebo-0.225-0.222-0.329-0.3770.0290.0340.0750.078-0.023-0.0500.0450.0950.0660.0660.1380.190-0.020-0.005-0.011-0.002

[back to top]

Mean Volume of Distribution of Albiglutide

Volume of distribution is defined as the apparent volume in which albiglutide is distributed. Samples were collected prior to the administration of study medication on dosing days (Weeks 0, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 15) and on the day of the clinic visit at Weeks 16, 17, 18, 20, 23, and 27. The Week 5, 8, and 12 post-dose (PK sampling was performed within 6 days of drug administration. (NCT00518115)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 15, 16, 17 18, 20, 23, and 27

InterventionLiters (Mean)
All Participants Receiving Any Dose of Albiglutide16400

[back to top]

Mean Clearance of Albiglutide

Clearance is defined as the volume of plasma cleared of albiglutide per unit time. Samples were collected prior to the administration of study medication on dosing days (Weeks 0, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 15) and on the day of the clinic visit at Weeks 16, 17, 18, 20, 23, and 27. The Week 5, 8, and 12 post-dose pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling was performed within 6 days of drug administration. (NCT00518115)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 15, 16, 17 18, 20, 23, and 27

Interventionmilliliters per hour (Mean)
All Participants Receiving Any Dose of Albiglutide94.2

[back to top]

Mean Absorption Rate of Albiglutide

Absorption rate is defined as the rate at which albiglutide enters the blood circulation. Samples were collected prior to the administration of study medication on dosing days (Weeks 0, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 15) and on the day of the clinic visit at Weeks 16, 17, 18, 20, 23, and 27. The Week 5, 8, and 12 post-dose (PK sampling was performed within 6 days of drug administration. (NCT00518115)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 15, 16, 17 18, 20, 23, and 27

Interventionhour^-1 (Mean)
All Participants Receiving Any Dose of Albiglutide0.0193

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference at Week 16

The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in waist circumference was calculated as the value at Week 16 minus the value at Baseline. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data, in which the last valid observation recorded on treatment (scheduled or unscheduled) was used to impute the missing measurement. For participants who had missing observations before their last observation on treatment, the closest previous non-missing on-treatment observation was carried forward to missing visits. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. (NCT00518115)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

InterventionCentimeters (Mean)
Placebo-0.51
Exenatide BID-3.53
Albiglutide 4 mg Weekly-1.50
Albiglutide 15 mg Weekly-3.16
Albiglutide 30 mg Weekly-1.14
Albiglutide 15 mg Bi-weekly-1.83
Albiglutide 30 mg Bi-weekly-0.47
Albiglutide 50 mg Bi-weekly-2.00
Albiglutide 50 mg Every 4 Weeks-0.88
Albiglutide 100 mg Every 4 Weeks-0.77

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 16

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in HbA1c was calculated as the value at Week 16 minus the value at Baseline. Based on ANCOVA: Change = treatment + Baseline HbA1c + prior therapy + gender + region. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data, in which the last valid observation recorded on treatment (scheduled or unscheduled) was used to impute the missing measurement. For participants who had missing observations before their last observation on treatment, the closest previous non-missing on-treatment observation was carried forward to missing visits. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. (NCT00518115)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

InterventionPercentage of HbA1c in the blood (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.46
Albiglutide 4 mg Weekly-0.25
Albiglutide 15 mg Weekly-0.71
Albiglutide 30 mg Weekly-1.08
Albiglutide 15 mg Bi-weekly-0.68
Albiglutide 30 mg Bi-weekly-1.01
Albiglutide 50 mg Bi-weekly-1.03
Albiglutide 50 mg Every 4 Weeks-0.80
Albiglutide 100 mg Every 4 Weeks-1.06

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 16

The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in body weight was calculated as the value at Week 16 minus the value at Baseline. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data, in which the last valid observation recorded on treatment (scheduled or unscheduled) was used to impute the missing measurement. For participants who had missing observations before their last observation on treatment, the closest previous non-missing on-treatment observation was carried forward to missing visits. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. (NCT00518115)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 16

InterventionKilograms (Kg) (Mean)
Placebo-0.71
Exenatide BID-2.41
Albiglutide 4 mg Weekly-0.91
Albiglutide 15 mg Weekly-0.90
Albiglutide 30 mg Weekly-1.43
Albiglutide 15 mg Bi-weekly-1.76
Albiglutide 30 mg Bi-weekly-1.59
Albiglutide 50 mg Bi-weekly-1.14
Albiglutide 50 mg Every 4 Weeks-1.08
Albiglutide 100 mg Every 4 Weeks-1.65

[back to top]

Change in High-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol at Week 26

Change in High-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation) (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.04
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.05

[back to top]

Change in Glycosylated A1c (HbA1c), Weeks 26-78

Percentage point change in glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) from Week 26 (end of randomisation) to Week 78 (end of treatment) within each treatment group (the liraglutide -> liraglutide group and the exenatide -> liraglutide group) (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 26, week 78

Interventionpercentage point of total HbA1c (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide0.25
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.00

[back to top]

Change in Glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) at Week 78

Percentage point change in glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) from baseline (week 0) to 78 weeks (end of treatment) within each treatment group (the liraglutide -> liraglutide group and the exenatide -> liraglutide group) (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 78

Interventionpercentage point of total HbA1c (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.98
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.85

[back to top]

Change in Glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) at Week 26

Percentage point change in glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation) (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26

Interventionpercentage point of total HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-1.12
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.79

[back to top]

Change in Free Fatty Acid, Weeks 26-78

Change in Free Fatty Acid (FFA) from Week 26 (end of randomisation) to Week 78 (end of treatment) within each treatment group (the liraglutide -> liraglutide group and the exenatide -> liraglutide group). (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 26, week 78

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide0.06
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide0.01

[back to top]

Change in Free Fatty Acid at Week 78

Change in Free Fatty Acid (FFA) from baseline (week 0) to 78 weeks (end of treatment) within each treatment group (the liraglutide -> liraglutide group and the exenatide -> liraglutide group). (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 78

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.10
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.07

[back to top]

Change in Free Fatty Acid at Week 26

Change in Free Fatty Acid (FFA) from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation) (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.17
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.10

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose, Weeks 26-78

Change in fasting plasma glucose from Week 26 (end of randomisation) to Week 78 (end of treatment) within each treatment group (the liraglutide -> liraglutide group and the exenatide -> liraglutide group) (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 26, week 78

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide0.7
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.1

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 78

Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline (week 0) to 78 weeks (end of treatment) within each treatment group (the liraglutide -> liraglutide group and the exenatide -> liraglutide group) (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 78

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-1.3
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.8

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26

Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation) (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-1.61
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.60

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight, Weeks 26-78

Change in body weight from Week 26 (end of randomisation) to Week 78 (end of treatment) within each treatment group (the liraglutide -> liraglutide group and the exenatide -> liraglutide group) (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 26, week 78

Interventionkg (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.4
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.7

[back to top]

Change in Low-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol at Week 78

Change in Low-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) from baseline (week 0) to 78 weeks (end of treatment) within each treatment group (the liraglutide -> liraglutide group and the exenatide -> liraglutide group). (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 78

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.30
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.21

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight at Week 26

Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation) (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-3.24
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-2.87

[back to top]

Change in Beta-cell Function, Weeks 26-78

"Change in Beta-cell function from Week 26 (end of randomisation) to Week 78 (end of treatment). Beta-cell function was derived from fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and fasting insulin concentrations using the homeostasic model assessment (HOMA) method which uses the assumption that normal-weight normal subjects aged under 35 years have a 100% beta-cell function (HOMA-B).~Beta-cell function: HOMA-B (%) = 20∙fasting insulin[uU/mL] divided by (FPG mmol/L]-3.5)." (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 26, week 78

Interventionpercentage point (%point) (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-18.18
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide2.29

[back to top]

Change in Beta-cell Function at Week 78

"Change in Beta-cell function from baseline (week 0) to 78 weeks (end of treatment). Beta-cell function was derived from fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and fasting insulin concentrations using the homeostasic model assessment (HOMA) method which uses the assumption that normal-weight normal subjects aged under 35 years have a 100% beta-cell function (HOMA-B).~Beta-cell function: HOMA-B (%) = 20∙fasting insulin[uU/mL] divided by (FPG mmol/L]-3.5)." (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 78

Interventionpercentage point (%point) (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide24.86
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide11.13

[back to top]

Change in Beta-cell Function at Week 26

"Change in Beta-cell function from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation). Beta-cell function was derived from fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and fasting insulin concentrations using the homeostasic model assessment (HOMA) method which uses the assumption that normal-weight normal subjects aged under 35 years have a 100% beta-cell function (HOMA-B).~Beta-cell function: HOMA-B (%) = 20∙fasting insulin[uU/mL] divided by (FPG mmol/L]-3.5)." (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26

Interventionpercentage point (%point) (Least Squares Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide32.12
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide2.74

[back to top]

Change in Total Cholesterol, Weeks 26-78

Change in total cholesterol (TC) from Week 26 (end of randomisation) to Week 78 (end of treatment) within each treatment group (the liraglutide -> liraglutide group and the exenatide -> liraglutide group). (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 26, week 78

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide0.11
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide0.12

[back to top]

Change in Apolipoprotein B, Weeks 26-78

Change in apolipoprotein B (ApoB) from Week 26 (end of randomisation) to Week 78 (end of treatment) within each treatment group (the liraglutide -> liraglutide group and the exenatide -> liraglutide group). (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 26, week 78

Interventiong/L (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.02
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.03

[back to top]

Change in Apolipoprotein B at Week 78

Change in apolipoprotein B (ApoB) from baseline (week 0) to 78 weeks (end of treatment) within each treatment group (the liraglutide -> liraglutide group and the exenatide -> liraglutide group). (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 78

Interventiong/L (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.08
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.07

[back to top]

Change in Apolipoprotein B at Week 26

Change in apolipoprotein B (ApoB) from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation) (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26

Interventiong/L (Least Squares Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.06
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.03

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight at Week 78

Change in body weight from baseline (Week 0) to 78 weeks (end of treatment) within each treatment group (the liraglutide -> liraglutide group and the exenatide -> liraglutide group) (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 78

Interventionkg (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-3.3
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-3.2

[back to top]

Change in Triglyceride at Week 78

Change in triglyceride (TG) from baseline (week 0) to 78 weeks (end of treatment) within each treatment group (the liraglutide -> liraglutide group and the exenatide -> liraglutide group). (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 78

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.3
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.1

[back to top]

Change in Triglyceride, Weeks 26-78

Change in Triglyceride (TG) from Week 26 (end of randomisation) to Week 78 (end of treatment) within each treatment group (the liraglutide -> liraglutide group and the exenatide -> liraglutide group). (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 26, week 78

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide0.1
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.0

[back to top]

Change in Total Cholesterol at Week 78

Change in total cholesterol (TC) from baseline (week 0) to 78 weeks (end of treatment) within each treatment group (the liraglutide -> liraglutide group and the exenatide -> liraglutide group). (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 78

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.07
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide0.09

[back to top]

Change in Total Cholesterol at Week 26

Change in total cholesterol (TC) from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation) (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.20
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.09

[back to top]

Change in Mean Prandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Lunch, Weeks 26-78

Change in mean prandial increment of plasma glucose after lunch from Week 26 (end of randomisation) to Week 78 (end of treatment). Prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the difference between plasma glucose values measured before and after a lunch. (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 26, week 78

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide0.05
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.09

[back to top]

Change in Mean Prandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Lunch at Week 78

Change in mean prandial increment of plasma glucose after lunch from baseline (week 0) to 78 weeks (end of treatment). Prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the difference between plasma glucose values measured before and after lunch. (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 78

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide0.26
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.37

[back to top]

Change in Mean Prandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Lunch at Week 26

Change in mean prandial increment of plasma glucose after lunch from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation). Prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the difference between plasma glucose values measured before and after lunch. (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide0.06
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide0.06

[back to top]

Change in Mean Prandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Dinner, Weeks 26-78

Change in mean prandial increment of plasma glucose after dinner from Week 26 (end of randomisation) to Week 78 (end of treatment). Prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the difference between plasma glucose values measured before and after dinner. (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 26, week 78

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide0.22
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide1.07

[back to top]

Change in Mean Prandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Dinner at Week 78

Change in mean prandial increment of plasma glucose after dinner from baseline (week 0) to 78 weeks (end of treatment). Prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the difference between plasma glucose values measured before and after dinner. (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 78

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.35
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.95

[back to top]

Change in Very Low-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol at Week 26

Change in very low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (VLDL-C) from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation) (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide0.20
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide0.27

[back to top]

Change in Very Low-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol at Week 78

Change in Very Low-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol (VLDL-C) from baseline (week 0) to 78 weeks (end of treatment) within each treatment group (the liraglutide -> liraglutide group and the exenatide -> liraglutide group). (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 78

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide0.27
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide0.31

[back to top]

Change in Very Low-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol, Weeks 26-78

Change in Very Low-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol (VLDL-C) from Week 26 (end of randomisation) to Week 78 (end of treatment) within each treatment group (the liraglutide -> liraglutide group and the exenatide -> liraglutide group). (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 26, week 78

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide0.06
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide0.03

[back to top]

Hypoglycaemic Episodes at Week 26

Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes occurring after baseline (week 0) and until week 26 (end of randomisation). Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as major, minor, or symptoms only. Major if the subject was unable to treat her/himself. Minor if subject was able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose was below 3.1 mmol/L. Symptoms only if subject was able to treat her/himself and with no plasma glucose measurement or plasma glucose higher than or equal to 3.1 mmol/L. (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: weeks 0-26

,
Interventionepisodes (Number)
MajorMinorSymptoms only
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide226493
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide020879

[back to top]

Change in Triglyceride at Week 26

Change in triglyceride (TG) from from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation) (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.41
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.23

[back to top]

Hypoglyceamic Episodes, Weeks 26-78

Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes occurring after end of randomisation (week 26) and until week 78 (end of treatment). Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as major, minor, or symptoms only. Major if the subject was unable to treat her/himself. Minor if subject was able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose was below 3.1 mmol/L. Symptoms only if subject was able to treat her/himself and with no plasma glucose measurement or plasma glucose higher than or equal to 3.1 mmol/L. (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: weeks 26-78

,
Interventionepisodes (Number)
MajorMinorSymptoms only
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide017232
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide114037

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Achieving Treatment Target of Either HbA1c < 7.0% or =< 6.5% at Week 26

Percentage of subjects achieving treatment target of HbA1c less than 7.0% or less than or equal to 6.5% at Week 26 (end of randomisation) (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26

,
Interventionpercentage (%) of subjects (Number)
Treatment target HbA1c < 7%Treatment target HbA1c =< 6.5%
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide4220
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide5334

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Achieving Treatment Target of Either HbA1c < 7.0% or =< 6.5% at Week 78

Percentage of subjects achieving treatment target of HbA1c less than 7.0% or less than or equal to 6.5% at Week 78 (end of treatment) (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 78

,
Interventionpercentage (%) of subjects (Number)
Treatment target HbA1c < 7%Treatment target HbA1c =< 6.5%
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide4835
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide4731

[back to top]

Change in Mean Prandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Dinner at Week 26

Change in mean prandial increment of plasma glucose after dinner from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation). Prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the difference between plasma glucose values measured before and after dinner. (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-1.10
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-2.11

[back to top]

Change in Mean Prandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Breakfast, Weeks 26-78

Change in mean prandial increment of plasma glucose after breakfast from Week 26 (end of randomisation) to Week 78 (end of treatment). Prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the difference between plasma glucose values measured before and after breakfast. (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 26, week 78

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.22
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide1.15

[back to top]

Change in Mean Prandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Breakfast at Week 78

Change in mean prandial increment of plasma glucose after breakfast from baseline (week 0) to 78 weeks (end of treatment). Prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the difference between plasma glucose values measured before and after breakfast. (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 78

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-1.08
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.99

[back to top]

Change in Mean Prandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Breakfast at Week 26

Change in mean prandial increment of plasma glucose after breakfast from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation). Prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the difference between glucose values measured before and after breakfast. (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.83
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-2.16

[back to top]

Change in Mean Postprandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Lunch, Weeks 26-78

Change in mean postprandial increment of plasma glucose after lunch from Week 26 (end of randomisation) to Week 78 (end of treatment). Prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the difference between plasma glucose values measured before and after lunch. (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 26, week 78

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide0.67
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.09

[back to top]

Change in Mean Postprandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Lunch at Week 78

Change in mean postprandial increment of plasma glucose after lunch from baseline (week 0) to 78 weeks (end of treatment). Prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the difference between plasma glucose values measured before and after lunch. (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 78

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-1.93
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-2.17

[back to top]

Change in Mean Postprandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Lunch at Week 26

Change in mean postprandial increment of plasma glucose after lunch from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation). Prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the difference between plasma glucose values measured before and after lunch. (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0. week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-2.74
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-2.35

[back to top]

Change in Mean Postprandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Dinner, Weeks 26-78

Change in mean postprandial increment of plasma glucose after dinner from Week 26 (end of randomisation) to Week 78 (end of treatment). Prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the difference between plasma glucose values measured before and after dinner. (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 26, week 78

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide0.32
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide0.58

[back to top]

Change in Mean Postprandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Dinner at Week 78

Change in mean postprandial increment of plasma glucose after dinner from baseline (week 0) to 78 weeks (end of treatment). Prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the difference between plasma glucose values measured before and after dinner. (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 78

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-2.21
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-2.55

[back to top]

Change in Mean Postprandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Dinner at Week 26

Change in mean postprandial increment of plasma glucose after dinner from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation). Prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the difference between plasma glucose values measured before and after dinner. (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-3.05
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-3.59

[back to top]

Change in Mean Postprandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Breakfast, Weeks 26-78

Change in mean postprandial increment of plasma glucose after breakfast from Week 26 (end of randomisation) to Week 78 (end of treatment). Prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the difference between plasma glucose values measured before and after breakfast. (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 26, week 78

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide0.06
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide0.72

[back to top]

Change in Mean Postprandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Breakfast at Week 78

Change in mean postprandial increment of plasma glucose after breakfast from baseline (week 0) to 78 weeks (end of treatment). Prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the difference between plasma glucose values measured before and after breakfast. (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 78

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-3.31
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-3.13

[back to top]

Change in Mean Postprandial Increment of Plasma Glucose After Breakfast at Week 26

Change in mean postprandial increment of plasma glucose after breakfast from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation). Prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the difference between plasma glucose values measured before and after breakfast. (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-3.20
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-3.93

[back to top]

Change in Low-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol, Weeks 26-78

Change in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) from Week 26 (end of randomisation) to Week 78 (end of treatment) within each treatment group (the liraglutide -> liraglutide group and the exenatide -> liraglutide group). (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 26, week 78

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide0.03
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide0.08

[back to top]

Change in Low-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol at Week 26

Change in Low-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation) (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.44
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.40

[back to top]

Change in High-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol, Weeks 26-78

Change in High-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) from Week 26 (end of randomisation) to Week 78 (end of treatment) within each treatment group (the liraglutide -> liraglutide group and the exenatide -> liraglutide group). (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 26, week 78

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.01
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide0.00

[back to top]

Change in High-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol at Week 78

Change in High-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) from baseline (week 0) to 78 weeks (end of treatment) within each treatment group (the liraglutide -> liraglutide group and the exenatide -> liraglutide group). (NCT00518882)
Timeframe: week 0, week 78

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Liraglutide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.03
Exenatide -> Liraglutide -> Liraglutide-0.02

[back to top]

Changes in Components of Liver Histology at Baseline and Week 24 Including Steatosis, Inflammation and Fibrosis

"Steatosis was grades on a scale of 0 (< 5%); 1 (5%- 33%); 2 (> 33% - 66%); and 3 (> 66%).~Inflammation was graded on a scale of 0 (No foci); 1 (< 2 foci per 200 X field); 2 (2-4 foci per 200 X field); and 3 (>4 foci per 200 X field) Fibrosis was graded on a scale of 0 (None); 1 (Mild periportal or perisinusoidal); 2 (Moderate periportal or perisinusoidal); 3 (Bridging fibrosis); and 4 (cirrhosis)" (NCT00529204)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Number)
steatosisinflammationfibrosis
Exenatide-1-10

[back to top]

Safety of Exenatide in Patients With NAFLD and Type 2 Diabetes

(NCT00529204)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Exenatide0

[back to top]

Reduction in Serum ALT From Baseline to 24 Weeks of Exenatide Therapy

(NCT00529204)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionIU (Number)
Exenatide61

[back to top]

Change in Reactive Hyperemic Index Over the 3-month Treatment Period

Change in reactive hyperemic index over the 3-month treatment period, which is a measure of endothelial (inner lining of blood vessels) function. This is measured as a ratio of post-occlusion blood flow volume versus baseline blood flow volume in fingertips. Higher ratio values are considered indicative of better arterial health. (NCT00546728)
Timeframe: Change from baseline to 3 months

Interventionratio (Mean)
Exenatide0.01
Metformin-0.17

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events Including Laboratory Abnormalities at the End of Study Participation

"Frequency of adverse events including laboratory abnormalities~HbA1C (less than 6.1% is considered normal)~Glucose control and absence of hypoglycemic coma/unawareness, as evidenced by no further requirement for third-party assistance or hospital attendance resulting from a severe hypoglycemic episode~Renal function, measured both by serum creatinine and calculated GFR using the Cockroft & Gault~Lipid profiles for cholesterol, triglycerides, low density lipoprotein (LDL) and high density lipoprotein (HDL)~PRA~Doppler ultrasound to exclude or document portal vein thrombosis~Immunosuppressive drug trough levels~Renal clearance (GFR)~Liver function tests~Diagnosis of opportunistic infections, e.g., CMV" (NCT00566813)
Timeframe: 15 months after the last transplant

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Islet Cells4
Islet Cells + Etanercept + Exenatide5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With HbA1c Less Than or Equal to 6.5 & Free of Severe Hypoglycemic Events

HbA1c less than or equal to 6.5 at end of 15 month study participation, and lack of or free from severe hypoglycemic events, defined as an event with symptoms compatible with hypoglycemia in which the subject required the assistance of another person and which was associated with either a blood glucose level < 50 mg/dl (2.8 mmol/L) or prompt recovery after oral carbohydrate, intravenous glucose, or glucagon administration. (NCT00566813)
Timeframe: At end of 15 month study participation

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Islet Cells4
Islet Cells + Etanercept + Exenatide5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Insulin Independence at End of Study Participation

Primary efficacy outcome: independence from insulin injections with adequate control of blood glucose in subjects with Type 1 diabetes. Transplant is considered a success when 2 weeks after their last transplant, subjects are not using insulin, and fasting glucose levels do not exceed 7.8 mmol/L (140 mg/dL) more than 3 times/week, and two-hour post-prandial glucose values do not exceed 10 mmol/L (180 mg/dL) more than 4 times/week. During the 15 months after last transplant, a subject will be considered a success if an illness or other event (e.g., high tacrolimus level) causes need for insulin not exceeding 14 days providing evidence of graft rejection is not apparent. The proportion of subjects who are insulin independent and meet criteria for glucose control will be determined at 2 weeks and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 15 months following their final islet transplant. (NCT00566813)
Timeframe: End of 15 Month Study Participation/Follow-up

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Islet Cells4
Islet Cells + Etanercept + Exenatide5

[back to top]

Change in 1,5-anhydroglucitol

Change in 1,5-anhydroglucitol from baseline to endpoint (i.e., 1,5-anhydroglucitol at week 24 minus 1,5-anhydroglucitol at week 0) (NCT00577824)
Timeframe: baseline, week 24

Interventionmcg/mL (Mean)
5mcg Exenatide BID5.29
10mcg Exenatide BID4.52
Placebo BID0.66

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Blood Glucose

Change in fasting blood glucose from baseline to endpoint (i.e., fasting blood glucose at week 24 minus fasting blood glucose at week 0) (NCT00577824)
Timeframe: baseline, week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
5mcg Exenatide BID-25.1
10mcg Exenatide BID-29.0
Placebo BID-7.6

[back to top]

Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) From Baseline to Week 24

Change in HbA1c from baseline following 24 weeks of treatment (i.e., HbA1c at week 24 minus HbA1c at week 0) (NCT00577824)
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeks

InterventionPercentage of hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
5mcg Exenatide BID-1.34
10mcg Exenatide BID-1.62
Placebo BID-0.28

[back to top]

Change in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)

Change in HDL-C from baseline to endpoint (i.e., HDL-C at week 24 minus HDL-C at week 0) (NCT00577824)
Timeframe: baseline, week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
5mcg Exenatide BID-4.63
10mcg Exenatide BID-4.22
Placebo BID-0.97

[back to top]

Change in Homeostasis Model Assessment - Beta Cell Function (HOMA-B)

Change in HOMA-B from baseline to endpoint (i.e., HOMA-B at week 24 minus HOMA-B at week 0). HOMA-B is a measurement of beta cell function. (NCT00577824)
Timeframe: baseline, week 24

Interventionratio (Mean)
5mcg Exenatide BID2.475
10mcg Exenatide BID6.836
Placebo BID-0.707

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight

Change in body weight form baseline to endpoint (i.e., body weight at week 24 minus body weight at week 0) (NCT00577824)
Timeframe: baseline, week 24

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
5mcg Exenatide BID-0.39
10mcg Exenatide BID-1.54
Placebo BID-0.47

[back to top]

Change in Homeostasis Model Assessment - Insulin Resistance (HOMA-R)

Change in HOMA-R from baseline to endpoint (i.e., HOMA-R at week 24 minus HOMA-R at week 0). HOMA-R is a measurement of insulin resistance. (NCT00577824)
Timeframe: baseline, week 24

Interventionratio (Mean)
5mcg Exenatide BID-0.541
10mcg Exenatide BID-0.366
Placebo BID-0.375

[back to top]

Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)

Change in LDL-C from baseline to endpoint (i.e., LDL-C at week 24 minus LDL-C at week 0) (NCT00577824)
Timeframe: baseline, week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
5mcg Exenatide BID-8.89
10mcg Exenatide BID-5.03
Placebo BID-2.66

[back to top]

Change in Serum Insulin

Change in serum insulin from baseline to endpoint (i.e., serum insulin at week 24 minus serum insulin at week 0) (NCT00577824)
Timeframe: baseline, week 24

InterventionmcU/mL (Mean)
5mcg Exenatide BID-0.2
10mcg Exenatide BID0.2
Placebo BID-0.7

[back to top]

7 Point Self-monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Profiles at Baseline and Week 24

Self-monitored blood glucose at 7 different time points during the day (glucose measurements before and 2 hours after the start of the morning, midday, and evening meals, and at bedtime). (NCT00577824)
Timeframe: baseline, week 24

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
30 minutes prior to breakfast SMBG at week 030 minutes prior to breakfast SMBG at week 242hr post-breakfast SMBG at week 02hr post-breakfast SMBG at week 2430 minutes prior to lunch SMBG at week 030 minutes prior to lunch SMBG at week 242hr post-lunch SMBG at week 02hr post-lunch SMBG at week 2430 minutes prior to dinner SMBG at week 030 minutes prior to dinner SMBG at week 242hr post-dinner SMBG at week 02hr post-dinner SMBG at week 24bedtime SMBG at week 0bedtime SMBG at week 24
10mcg Exenatide BID175140263149189152268195176140247141225151
5mcg Exenatide BID169150261178179155263213166149246160216170
Placebo BID170167254257179182264254173181239247206212

[back to top]

Change in Waist Size

Change in waist size from baseline to endpoint (i.e., waist size at week 24 minus waist size at week 0) (NCT00577824)
Timeframe: baseline, week 24

Interventioncm (Mean)
5mcg Exenatide BID-0.17
10mcg Exenatide BID-1.81
Placebo BID0.41

[back to top]

Change in C-peptide

Change in C-peptide from baseline to endpoint (i.e., C-peptide at week 24 minus C-peptide at week 0) (NCT00577824)
Timeframe: baseline, week 24

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
5mcg Exenatide BID0.05
10mcg Exenatide BID0.07
Placebo BID-0.08

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c < 6.5%

Percentage of subjects whose HbA1c was >=6.5% at baseline who achieved an HbA1c < 6.5% at endpoint (i.e., number of eligible subjects who achieved HbA1c < 6.5% divided by total number of eligible subjects times 100) (NCT00577824)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
5mcg Exenatide BID36.6
10mcg Exenatide BID47.2
Placebo BID8.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c < 7.0%

Percentage of subjects whose HbA1c was >=7.0% at baseline who achieved an HbA1c < 7.0% at endpoint (i.e., number of eligible subjects who achieved HbA1c < 7.0% divided by total number of eligible subjects times 100) (NCT00577824)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
5mcg Exenatide BID67.1
10mcg Exenatide BID71.0
Placebo BID15.2

[back to top]

Change in Triglycerides

Change in triglycerides from baseline to endpoint (i.e., triglycerides at week 24 minus triglycerides at week 0) (NCT00577824)
Timeframe: baseline, week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
5mcg Exenatide BID4.00
10mcg Exenatide BID4.13
Placebo BID-4.60

[back to top]

Change in Total Cholesterol

Change in total cholesterol from baseline to endpoint (i.e., total cholesterol at week 24 minus total cholesterol at week 0) (NCT00577824)
Timeframe: baseline, week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
5mcg Exenatide BID-14.45
10mcg Exenatide BID-7.01
Placebo BID-4.80

[back to top]

Change in Waist-to-hip Ratio

Change in waist-to-hip ratio from baseline to endpoint (i.e., waist-to-hip ratio at week 24 minus waist-to-hip ratio at week 0). Waist-to-hip ratio is waist circumference divided by hip circumference. (NCT00577824)
Timeframe: baseline, week 24

Interventionratio (cm/cm) (Mean)
5mcg Exenatide BID0.0016
10mcg Exenatide BID-0.0108
Placebo BID-0.0007

[back to top]

Change in Impact of Weight on Quality of Life (IWQOL)-Lite Score

"IWQOL-Lite analysis of change from baseline to endpoint (26 weeks). IWQOL-Lite is a 31-item questionnaire, assessing the domains of physical function, self-esteem, sexual life, public distress, and work. Response categories for each item range from 1 = never true to 5 = always true." (NCT00603239)
Timeframe: baseline and 26 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change in Total ScoreChange in Physical Function componentChange in Self-Esteem componentChange in Sexual Life componentChange in Public Distress componentChange in Work component
Exenatide Twice Daily (BID)-1.56-3.840.200.12-0.48-0.91
Placebo0.11-1.05-0.545.01-0.280.08

[back to top]

Change in Euroqol - 5 Domain Quality of Life (EQ-5D) Score

EQ-5D Score - change from baseline to endpoint (26 weeks). EQ-5D is a 5-item questionnaire used to characterize current health states. The tool and accompanying visual analog scale (VAS) assess 5 domains of quality of life, including mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain, and anxiety/depression. Weights are used to score the responses to the 5 domains, with 3 options possible in each domain: extreme problems, some/moderate problems, or no problems. Scores range from 0 to 1, with a score of 1 representing a perfect health state. (NCT00603239)
Timeframe: baseline and 26 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change in Health State ScoreChange in Mobility componentChange in Self Care componentChange Usual Activities componentChange in Pain/Discomfort componentChange in Anxiety/Depression component
Exenatide Twice Daily (BID)0.790.140.080.170.29-0.10
Placebo-2.940.150.030.190.23-0.26

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <= 7%

Percentage of intent-to-treat (ITT) patients who had HbA1c > 7% at baseline that decreased to <= 7% at endpoint (Week 26 or early discontinuation) (NCT00603239)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Exenatide Twice Daily (BID)49.0
Placebo36.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <= 6.5%

Percentage of ITT patients who had achieved HbA1c <= 6.5% at endpoint (Week 26 or early discontinuation) (NCT00603239)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Exenatide Twice Daily (BID)33.6
Placebo13.0

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Who Experienced an Episode of Minor Hypoglycemia

Overall number of subjects who experienced an episode of minor hypoglycemia. (NCT00603239)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Exenatide Twice Daily (BID)4
Placebo1

[back to top]

Change in Waist Circumference

Change in waist circumference from baseline to endpoint (26 weeks) (NCT00603239)
Timeframe: baseline and 26 weeks

Interventioncm (Mean)
Exenatide Twice Daily (BID)-2.26
Placebo-1.85

[back to top]

Change in Insulin Sensitivity.

Change in homeostatic model assessment-insulin sensitivity (HOMA-S) from baseline to endpoint (26 weeks) (outcome measure is presented as the ratio of endpoint HOMA-S divided by baseline HOMA-S). (NCT00603239)
Timeframe: baseline and 26 weeks

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Twice Daily (BID)1.09
Placebo1.07

[back to top]

Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

Change in HbA1c from baseline to endpoint after 26 weeks of treatment (i.e., HbA1c at endpoint minus HbA1c at baseline) (NCT00603239)
Timeframe: baseline and 26 weeks

InterventionPercentage (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Twice Daily (BID)-0.84
Placebo-0.10

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Serum Glucose (FSG)

Change in FSG from baseline to endpoint (26 weeks) (NCT00603239)
Timeframe: baseline and 26 weeks

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Twice Daily (BID)-0.65
Placebo0.37

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight

Change in body weight from baseline to endpoint (26 weeks) (NCT00603239)
Timeframe: baseline and 26 weeks

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Twice Daily (BID)-1.43
Placebo-0.75

[back to top]

Change in Beta-cell Function

Change in homeostatic model assessment-beta cell (HOMA-B) from baseline to endpoint (Week 26) (outcome measure is presented as the ratio of endpoint HOMA-B divided by baseline HOMA-B). HOMA-B is a measure of pancreatic beta-cell function. (NCT00603239)
Timeframe: baseline and 26 weeks

Interventionratio (Geometric Mean)
Exenatide Twice Daily (BID)1.08
Placebo0.84

[back to top]

Weight Loss After Administration of Exenatide.

Body weight after overnight fast in light clothing (NCT00623545)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionkg (Mean)
Exenitide Treatment-2.0

[back to top]

Change in Energy Intake Measured Before Treatment and at the End of Treatment.

Energy intake is as calculated from energy expenditure as measured by doubly labeled water and change in body energy stores before and at the end of treatment. Units are kcal/d. (NCT00623545)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionkcal/d (Mean)
Exenitide Treatment-167

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c Concentration <7.0% at Month 24

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c Concentration <7.0% at Month 24. Only patients with baseline HbA1c >= 7.0 % were included in this analysis (NCT00635492)
Timeframe: Month 24

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Exenatide BID26.9
Insulin28.5

[back to top]

Diet and Exercise Advice in Diabetes Management Associated With Treatment Choice at Baseline

Receipt of diet and exercise advice was one of the Factors evaluated for association with treatment choice at baseline. The number of participants who checked yes or no during the baseline visit for prior receipt of diet/exercise advice in his/her Diabetes management is provided below and the statistical analysis provides the 2 arms odds ratio. Participants were assigned to the exenatide BID or insulin cohort based the injectable treatment started at baseline; analyses were conducted irrespective of later treatment changes. Baseline was Visit T1 (prior to start of treatment). (NCT00635492)
Timeframe: Baseline

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
MissingNoYesUnknown
Exenatide BID12131910124
Insulin1237905172

[back to top]

Changes in HbA1c From Baseline to Month 24

Changes in HbA1c From Baseline to Month 24 (NCT00635492)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 24

Interventionpercentage of total hemoglobin (Mean)
Exenatide BID-1.03
Insulin-1.71

[back to top]

Reasons for Discontinuation of Baseline Regimen

Reasons for Discontinuation of Baseline Regimen (NCT00635492)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 24

,
Interventionnumber of patients (Number)
Inadequate responseAdverse eventPatient decisionNon complianceCannot afford medicationOther
Exenatide BID17091699450
Insulin8711153138

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Hospitalized Between Baseline and 24 Months

Percentage of Patients Hospitalized Between Baseline and 24 Months (NCT00635492)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 24

,
Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Last 6 months prior to baselineBaseline to 24 months
Exenatide BID4.74.3
Insulin6.47.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Contacting Health Care Providers Between Baseline and 24 Months

Percentage of Patients Contacting Health Care Providers Between Baseline and 24 Months (NCT00635492)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 24

,
Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Last 6 months prior to baselineBaseline to 24 months
Exenatide BID94.490.4
Insulin94.192.3

[back to top]

Number of Contacts With Health Care Providers Between Baseline and 24 Months

Number of contacts with Health Care Providers Between Baseline and 24 Months (NCT00635492)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 24

,
Interventionnumber of contacts (Mean)
Last 6 months prior to baselineBaseline to 24 months
Exenatide BID7.1719.00
Insulin7.6424.58

[back to top]

Factors Associated With Treatment Change in Insulin Cohort

Hazards ratios from Backward Cox Regression Model for time to significant treatment change in Insulin cohort (NCT00635492)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 24

Interventionhazard ratio (Number)
HbA1c (%) at baselineDHP barriers to activity subscale at baselineGastrointestinal symptoms: yes vs. no at baselineInsulin regimen: basal/bolus vs. long-acting onlyInsulin regimen: mixtures vs. long-acting onlyInsulin regimen: other vs. long-acting onlyInsulin regimen: short-acting only vs. long-actin
Insulin Cohort1.1180.9602.5320.4370.6760.5492.164

[back to top]

Factors Associated With Treatment Change in Exenatide BID Cohort

Hazards ratios from Backward Cox Regression Model for time to significant treatment change in Exenatide BID cohort. EQ-5D (Health Questionnaire Copyright @ Euro QoL Group 1998). (NCT00635492)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 24

Interventionhazard ratio (Number)
Gastro intestinal symptoms: yes vs no at baselineEQ-5D index value at baseline
Exenatide BID1.4630.601

[back to top]

Estimates of Probability to Remain on Initial Injectable Treatment at 12 and 24 Months.

"The primary objective of this study is to estimate the time spent on initial treatment regime before significant treatment change for patients with type 2 diabetes initiating therapy with either insulin or exenatide for the first time.~Initial treatment regime is defined as the treatment regime prescribed when the patient is enrolled in the study.~Significant treatment change for patients initiated on insulin or exenatide is defined as at least one of the following:~Insulin:~Addition of a new medication for the treatment of type 2 diabetes~A change in the number of times insulin is administered per day~Discontinuation of any insulin initiated at baseline~Substitution of a human insulin for an analogue insulin or vice-versa.~Switching between brands of the same class/type of insulin is not included in the definition of significant treatment change.~Exenatide:~Addition of a new medication for the treatment of type 2 diabetes~Discontinuation of exenatide." (NCT00635492)
Timeframe: Month 24

,
Interventionprobability (%) (Number)
Estimate at 24 monthsEstimate at 12 months
Exenatide BID53.967.8
Insulin60.670.6

[back to top]

Changes in Weight From Baseline to Month 24

Changes in Weight From Baseline to Month 24 (NCT00635492)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 24

Interventionkg (Mean)
Exenatide BID-3.22
Insulin2.16

[back to top]

Disinhibited Eating Associated With Treatment Choice at Baseline

Diabetes Health Profile (DHP-18) - consists of 18 items across 3 domains (psychological distress, barriers to activity, and disinhibited eating), with each item standardized score rated from 0-100; 0=no dysfunction, higher numbers=greater dysfunction. The subscale of disinhibited eating was one of the Factors evaluated for association with treatment choice at baseline. The number of participants with disinhibited eating at baseline is provided below and the statistical analysis provides the 2 arms odds ratio for disinhibited eating. Participants were assigned to the exenatide BID or insulin cohort based the injectable treatment started at baseline; analyses were conducted irrespective of later treatment changes. Baseline was Visit T1 (prior to start of treatment). (NCT00635492)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Exenatide BID43.52
Insulin34.38

[back to top]

Frequent Blood Glucose Self Monitoring Associated With Treatment Choice at Baseline

Frequent glucose self-testing (1 test/week more) was one of the Factors evaluated for association with treatment choice at baseline. The mean number of self monitoring blood glucose tests per week over the last 4 weeks prior to baseline was determined at baseline and is provided below. The statistical analysis provides the 2 arms odds ratio. Participants were assigned to the exenatide BID or insulin cohort based the injectable treatment started at baseline; analyses were conducted irrespective of later treatment changes. Baseline was Visit T1 (prior to start of treatment). (NCT00635492)
Timeframe: 4 weeks prior to Baseline

Interventiontests/week (Mean)
Exenatide BID9.28
Insulin9.91

[back to top]

Higher Body Mass Index (BMI) Associated With Treatment Choice at Baseline

Higher BMI was one of the Factors evaluated for association with treatment choice at baseline. BMI was calculated as body weight in kilograms (kg) divided by height in meters (m) squared (kg/m^2). The mean BMI at baseline is provided below and the statistical analysis provides the 2 arms odds ratio for BMI=1 kg/m^2 higher. Participants were assigned to the exenatide BID or insulin cohort based the injectable treatment started at baseline; analyses were conducted irrespective of later treatment changes. Baseline was Visit T1 (prior to start of treatment). (NCT00635492)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionkg/m^2 (Mean)
Exenatide BID35.3
Insulin29.7

[back to top]

Higher Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1) Associated With Treatment Choice at Baseline

Higher HbA1c was one of the Factors evaluated for association with treatment choice at baseline.HbA1c was reported in percent of hemoglobin. The mean HbA1c at baseline is provided below and the statistical analysis provides the 2 arms odds ratio for HbA1c=1% higher. (NCT00635492)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionpercent of hemoglobin (Mean)
Exenatide BID8.4
Insulin9.2

[back to top]

Higher Random Glucose Associated With Treatment Choice at Baseline

Random Glucose 1 millimole per liter (mmol/L) higher was one of the Factors evaluated for association with treatment choice at baseline. Random glucose is a glucose within the last 6 months prior to baseline. The mean is provided below and the statistical analysis provides the 2 arms odds ratio for the glucose 1 mmol/L higher. Participants were assigned to the exenatide BID or insulin cohort based the injectable treatment started at baseline; analyses were conducted irrespective of later treatment changes. Baseline was Visit T1 (prior to start of treatment). (NCT00635492)
Timeframe: 6 months prior to Baseline

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Exenatide BID10.37
Insulin12.13

[back to top]

Higher Value of Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Associated With Treatment Choice at Baseline

Higher (1 mmol/L higher) LDL cholesterol was one of the Factors evaluated for association with treatment choice at baseline. The mean LDL cholesterol at baseline is provided below and the statistical analysis provides the 2 arms odds ratio for 1 mmol/L higher at baseline. Participants were assigned to the exenatide BID or insulin cohort based the injectable treatment started at baseline; analyses were conducted irrespective of later treatment changes. Baseline was Visit T1 (prior to start of treatment). (NCT00635492)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Exenatide BID2.82
Insulin3.00

[back to top]

Incidence of Gastro Intestinal Symptoms Between Baseline and 24 Months

Incidence of Gastro Intestinal Symptoms between Baseline and 24 Months (NCT00635492)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 24

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Exenatide BID29.4
Insulin5.0

[back to top]

Incidence of Hypoglycemia Between Baseline and 24 Months

Incidence of Hypoglycemia between Baseline and 24 Months (NCT00635492)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 24

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Exenatide BID17.5
Insulin35.2

[back to top]

Older Age Associated With Treatment Choice at Baseline

Older age (1 year older) was one of the Factors evaluated for association with treatment choice at baseline. The mean age at baseline is provided below and the statistical analysis provides the 2 arms odds ratio for age 1 year older. Participants were assigned to the exenatide BID or insulin cohort based the injectable treatment started at baseline; analyses were conducted irrespective of later treatment changes. Baseline was Visit T1 (prior to start of treatment). (NCT00635492)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionyears (Mean)
Exenatide BID58.1
Insulin63.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c Concentration <6.5% at Month 24

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c Concentration <6.5% at Month 24. Note: Only patients with baseline HbA1c >=6.5% were included in this analysis. (NCT00635492)
Timeframe: Month 24

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Exenatide BID12.5
Insulin10.7

[back to top]

Assessment on Event Rate of Treatment-emergent Hypoglycemic Events

Major hypoglycemia: events that, in the judgment of the investigator or physician, resulted in loss of consciousness, seizure, coma, or other change in mental status consistent with neuroglycopenia, in which symptoms resolved after administration of intramuscular glucagon or intravenous glucose, required third-party assistance, and was accompanied by a blood glucose concentration < 54 mg/dL prior to treatment. Minor hypoglycemia: symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia and blood glucose concentration < 54 mg/dL prior to treatment and not classified as major hypoglycemia. (NCT00637273)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 26

,,
Interventionrate per subject-year (Mean)
Treatment-Emergent Major HypoglycemiaTreatment-Emergent Minor Hypoglycemia
Exenatide Once Weekly0.000.03
Pioglitazone0.000.01
Sitagliptin0.000.12

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26

Absolute change in HbA1c from baseline (Day 1) to Week 26 [Week 26 - Baseline]. (NCT00637273)
Timeframe: Day 1, Week 26

Interventionpercentage of total hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-1.55
Sitagliptin-0.92
Pioglitazone-1.23

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 26

Change in fasting total cholesterol from baseline (Day 1) to Week 26. (NCT00637273)
Timeframe: Day 1, Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-0.6
Sitagliptin3.1
Pioglitazone6.2

[back to top]

Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 26

Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline (Day 1) to Week 26. (NCT00637273)
Timeframe: Day 1, Week 26

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-1.4
Sitagliptin-0.4
Pioglitazone-2.5

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26

Change in body weight from baseline (Day 1) to Week 26. (NCT00637273)
Timeframe: Day 1, Week 26

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-2.31
Sitagliptin-0.77
Pioglitazone2.79

[back to top]

Change in Fasting High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) From Baseline to Week 26

Change in fasting HDL from baseline (Day 1) to Week 26. (NCT00637273)
Timeframe: Day 1, Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly2.0
Sitagliptin2.0
Pioglitazone6.2

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline to Week 26

Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline (Day 1) to Week 26. (NCT00637273)
Timeframe: Day 1, Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-31.8
Sitagliptin-16.3
Pioglitazone-27.3

[back to top]

Ratio of Fasting Triglycerides at Week 26 to Baseline

Ratio of triglycerides (measured in mg/dL) at Week 26 to baseline (Day 1). Log (Postbaseline Triglycerides) - log (Baseline Triglycerides); change from baseline to endpoint is presented as ratio of endpoint to baseline. (NCT00637273)
Timeframe: Day 1, Week 26

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly0.95
Sitagliptin0.95
Pioglitazone0.84

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Target of <7% at Week 26

Percentages of subjects achieving HbA1c target values of <7% at Week 26. (NCT00637273)
Timeframe: Week 26

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Exenatide Once Weekly58.8
Sitagliptin30.7
Pioglitazone43.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Target of <=6.5% at Week 26

Percentages of subjects achieving HbA1c target values of <=6.5% at Week 26. (NCT00637273)
Timeframe: Week 26

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Exenatide Once Weekly38.8
Sitagliptin15.7
Pioglitazone26.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Target of <=6.0% at Week 26

Percentages of subjects achieving HbA1c target values of <=6.0% at Week 26. (NCT00637273)
Timeframe: Week 26

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Exenatide Once Weekly13.8
Sitagliptin9.0
Pioglitazone4.8

[back to top]

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 26

Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline (Day 1) to Week 26. (NCT00637273)
Timeframe: Day 1, Week 26

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-3.6
Sitagliptin0.2
Pioglitazone-1.6

[back to top]

Change in Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 26

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) from Baseline to Week 26 (NCT00641056)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Systolic Blood PressureDiastolic Blood Pressure
Exenatide Once Weekly-3.03-1.15
Insulin Glargine-0.63-0.72

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <=7.0% at Week 26

Percentage of patients achieving HbA1c <=7.0% at Week 26 (for patients with HbA1c >7% at baseline) (NCT00641056)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Exenatide Once Weekly62.2
Insulin Glargine54.1

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Serum Glucose (FSG) From Baseline to Week 26

Change in FSG (mmol/L) from Baseline to Week 26 (NCT00641056)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-2.13
Insulin Glargine-2.76

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26

Change in HbA1c from baseline to Week 26 (NCT00641056)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionpercentage of total hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-1.47
Insulin Glargine-1.31

[back to top]

Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL) From Baseline to Week 26

Change in HDL (mmol/L) from Baseline to Week 26 (NCT00641056)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-0.00
Insulin Glargine0.01

[back to top]

Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 26

Change in Total Cholesterol (mmol/L) from Baseline to Week 26 (NCT00641056)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-0.12
Insulin Glargine-0.04

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight (BW) From Baseline to Week 26

Change in BW (kg) from Baseline to Week 26 (NCT00641056)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-2.63
Insulin Glargine1.42

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <=6.5% at Week 26

Percentage of patients achieving HbA1c <=6.5% at Week 26 (for patients with HbA1c >6.5% at baseline) (NCT00641056)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Exenatide Once Weekly43.2
Insulin Glargine28.4

[back to top]

Ratio of Triglycerides at Week 26 to Baseline

Ratio of Triglycerides (measured in mmol/L) at Week 26 to Baseline. Log (Postbaseline Triglycerides) - log (Baseline Triglycerides); change from baseline to endpoint is presented as ratio of endpoint to baseline. (NCT00641056)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly0.96
Insulin Glargine0.89

[back to top]

Assessment on Event Rate of Treatment-emergent Hypoglycemic Episodes

Major hypoglycemia: any episode with symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia that resulted in loss of consciousness or seizure with prompt recovery in response to administration of glucagon or glucose or documented hypoglycemia (blood glucose <3.0 mmol/L [54 mg/dL]) and required the assistance of another person. Minor hypoglycemia: any time a patient felt that he or she was experiencing a sign or symptom of hypoglycemia that was self-treated or resolved on its own and had a blood glucose level <3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) and not classified as major hypoglycemia. (NCT00641056)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 26

,,,
Interventionrate per subject-year (Mean)
Major HypoglycemiaMinor Hypoglycemia
Exenatide Once Weekly No SU0.010.10
Exenatide Once Weekly With SU0.001.14
Insulin Glargine No SU0.010.63
Insulin Glargine With SU0.032.66

[back to top]

Change in NAS

The NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) is an underweight sum of steatosis (score 0-3), inflammation (score 0-3), ballooning scores (0-2). The NAS can range from 0-8 with the higher score indicating more aggressive disease. (NCT00650546)
Timeframe: Between baseline and 28 weeks of treatment with exenatide, sub q, 5-10 mcq.

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Individuals Who Recieved Treatment With Exenatide-1.5

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Improvement in Liver Histology After Treatment With Exenatide

Number of patients with liver histology improved with exenatide. The improvement of liver histology was defined as (1) no worsening of the fibrosis score, (11) improved score by at least one point in hepatocyte ballooning, and (111) either (a) improvement in NAS (NAFLD Activity Score) by two points spread across as least two of the three NAS components, or by (B)post-treatment NAS<3. (NCT00650546)
Timeframe: between baseline and 24-28 weeks after initiating treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment With Exenatide8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving HbA1c Goals of < 7%, <= 6.5%, and < 6.5% Through Week 28

The percentage of participants achieving HbA1c goals of < 7%, <= 6.5%, and < 6.5% through Week 28 were compared between treatments using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) procedure, in which screening HbA1c strata and background diabetes therapy strata served as the stratification factors. The CMH analysis excluded measurements after initiation of rescue medication and study drug discontinuation with missing data treated as non-responder. (NCT00658021)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20 and 28

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
HbA1c < 7%: Week 0HbA1c < 7%: Week 4HbA1c < 7%: Week 12HbA1c < 7%: Week 20HbA1c < 7%: Week 28HbA1c <=6.5%: Week 0HbA1c <=6.5%: Week 4HbA1c <=6.5%: Week 12HbA1c <=6.5%: Week 20HbA1c <=6.5%: Week 28HbA1c <6.5%: Week 0HbA1c <6.5%: Week 4HbA1c <6.5%: Week 12HbA1c <6.5%: Week 20HbA1c <6.5%: Week 28
Placebo38.142.933.335.728.616.723.823.819.019.07.121.419.019.014.3
Total Exenatide Twice Daily (EBID)37.244.943.635.933.317.929.533.324.423.115.426.930.821.823.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Discontinuing the Study Due to Failure to Maintain Glycemic Control Through Week 28

"Participants were discontinued from the study due to failure to maintain glycemic control if either discontinuation reason on summary case report form was Loss of glucose control or AE with lower level Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) term Loss of control of blood sugar or Hyperglycaemia leading to study drug discontinuation, using MedDRA Version 23.0." (NCT00658021)
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 28

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 2Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24Week 28
Placebo02.405.0014.76.90
Total Exenatide Twice Daily (EBID)0001.41.4001.6

[back to top]

Adjusted Change From Baseline in Fasting Serum Insulin at Week 28

Change from baseline in fasting serum insulin is reported as adjusted LS mean values at Week 28. Baseline is defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of study medication. An ANCOVA analysis was performed, excluding measurements after initiation of rescue medication and study drug discontinuation. (NCT00658021)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 28

Interventionpicomoles per liter (Least Squares Mean)
Total Exenatide Twice Daily (EBID)1.67
Placebo12.49

[back to top]

Adjusted Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 28

Change from baseline in body weight is reported as adjusted LS mean values at Weeks 4, 12, 20 and 28. Baseline is defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of study medication. A MMRM analysis was performed, excluding measurements after initiation of rescue medication and study drug discontinuation. (NCT00658021)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 28

,
Interventionkilogram (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4Week 12Week 20Week 28
Placebo0.04-0.42-0.33-0.36
Total Exenatide Twice Daily (EBID)-0.89-1.09-0.71-0.81

[back to top]

Adjusted Change From Baseline in Fasting Serum Glucose (FSG) at Week 28

Change from baseline in FSG is reported as adjusted LS mean values at Week 28. Baseline is defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of study medication. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) analysis was performed, excluding measurements after initiation of rescue medication and study drug discontinuation. (NCT00658021)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 28

Interventionmillimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Least Squares Mean)
Total Exenatide Twice Daily (EBID)0.791
Placebo1.072

[back to top]

Adjusted Change From Baseline in Glycated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 28

Change from baseline in HbA1c is reported as adjusted least square (LS) mean values at Week 28. Baseline is defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of study medication. A mixed model with repeated measures (MMRM) analysis was performed, excluding measurements after initiation of rescue medication and study drug discontinuation. (NCT00658021)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 28

Interventionpercentage (%HbA1c) (Least Squares Mean)
Total Exenatide Twice Daily (EBID)0.11
Placebo0.38

[back to top]

Adjusted Change From Baseline in Homeostasis Model Assessments - Beta-Cell Function (HOMA-B) and Insulin Sensitivity (HOMA-S) at Week 28

Change from baseline in HOMA-B and HOMA-S are reported as adjusted LS mean values at Week 28. Baseline is defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of study medication. An ANCOVA analysis was performed, excluding measurements after initiation of rescue medication and study drug discontinuation. (NCT00658021)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 28

,
Interventionpercentage (%HOMA-B and %HOMA-S) (Least Squares Mean)
HOMA-BHOMA-S
Placebo-22.10-2.90
Total Exenatide Twice Daily (EBID)-25.93-3.18

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Post-Treatment Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) During Safety Follow-up Period

Post-treatment adverse events (AEs) were defined as AEs that started or worsened during the off-treatment period (Safety Follow-up Period), which was defined as the day after the Week 28/early discontinuation (ED) visit to the date of completion of the Safety Follow-up Period. The AESIs recorded were as follows: hematological malignancies, thyroid neoplasms, pancreas neoplasms, aplastic anemia, pancreatitis, pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes (including congenital anomalies). (NCT00658021)
Timeframe: From 1 day after the Week 28/ED visit to 3 years after Week 28/ED visit.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Exenatide 5 mcg0
Exenatide 10 mcg0
Placebo0

[back to top]

Adjusted Change From Baseline in Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) at Week 28

Change from baseline in SMBG measurements are reported as adjusted LS mean values at Week 28. SMBG measurements were taken before (pre-prandial) and 2 hours after (post-prandial) the 2 main meals of the day on 3 separate days during the week before baseline (Day 1) and Week 28. Post-prandial excursions were calculated as the difference between the pre-prandial and post-prandial blood glucose concentrations (post-prandial - pre-prandial) and averaged (mean) over the 2 main meals over the 3 separate days in each period. Baseline is defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of study medication. An ANCOVA analysis was performed, excluding measurements after initiation of rescue medication and study drug discontinuation. (NCT00658021)
Timeframe: Pre-meal and 2 hours post-meal on Baseline (Day 1) and Week 28

,
Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Pre-meal SMBGPost-meal SMBGPost-prandial excursion SMBGOverall SMBG
Placebo-0.888-1.542-0.391-1.193
Total Exenatide Twice Daily (EBID)-0.699-1.029-0.181-0.877

[back to top]

The Percentage of Per Protocol Participants Randomized and Treated in Each Arm Who Had Lab-measured A1c <6.5% at 24 Weeks of Treatment

efficacy criteria, 50% of per protocol participants reached A1c target of <6.5% (NCT00667732)
Timeframe: After 24 weeks of randomized treatment

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Exenatide Group50
Placebo Group12

[back to top]

The Percentage of Intent to Treat Participants Randomized and Treated in Each Arm Who Had Lab-measured A1c <6.5% at 24 Weeks of Treatment

(NCT00667732)
Timeframe: After 24 weeks of randomized treatment

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Exenatide Group47
Placebo Group12

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <=7% at Week 26

Percentage of patients achieving HbA1c <=7% at Week 26 (for patients with baseline HbA1c >7%). (NCT00676338)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Exenatide Once Weekly64.2
Metformin57.3
Pioglitazone63.3
Sitagliptin45.5

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26

Change in Body Weight from baseline to Week 26. (NCT00676338)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-2.04
Metformin-2.00
Pioglitazone1.52
Sitagliptin-0.76

[back to top]

Assessment on Event Rate of Treatment-emergent Major Hypoglycemic Events

Major hypoglycemia is defined as any event that has symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia resulting in loss of consciousness or seizure that shows prompt recovery in response to administration of glucagon or glucose, or documented hypoglycemia (blood glucose <3.0 mmol/L [54 mg/dL]) requiring the assistance of another person because of severe impairment in consciousness or behavior (whether or not symptoms of hypoglycemia are detected by the patient). Mean event rate = total number of events for all subjects in a treatment regimen / the total number of subject years of exposure for all subjects in that treatment. Standard error = square root of (total number of events / (subject years of exposure)**2). (NCT00676338)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 26

Interventionevents per subject-year (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly0.00
Metformin0.00
Pioglitazone0.00
Sitagliptin0.00

[back to top]

Assessment on Event Rate of Treatment-Emergent Minor Hypoglycemic Events

Minor hypoglycemia is defined as a sign or symptom associated with hypoglycemia that is either self-treated by the patient or resolves on its own AND has a concurrent finger stick blood glucose <3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) and not classified as major hypoglycemia. Mean event rate = total number of events for all subjects in a treatment regimen / the total number of subject years of exposure for all subjects in that treatment. Standard error = square root of (total number of events / (subject years of exposure)**2). (NCT00676338)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 26

Interventionevents per subject-year (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly0.05
Metformin0.00
Pioglitazone0.00
Sitagliptin0.00

[back to top]

Ratio of Fasting Triglycerides at Week 26 to Baseline

Ratio of Fasting Triglycerides (measured in mmol/L) at Week 26 to baseline. Log(Post-baseline Triglycerides) - log(Baseline Triglycerides); change from baseline to Week 26 is presented as ratio of endpoint to baseline. (NCT00676338)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly0.98
Metformin0.96
Pioglitazone0.85
Sitagliptin0.94

[back to top]

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 26.

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure from baseline to Week 26. (NCT00676338)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-1.25
Metformin0.14
Pioglitazone-1.74
Sitagliptin-1.81

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26

Change in HbA1c from baseline to Week 26. (NCT00676338)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionpercentage of total hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-1.53
Metformin-1.48
Pioglitazone-1.63
Sitagliptin-1.15

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Total Cholesterol (TC) From Baseline to Week 26

Change in Fasting TC from baseline to Week 26. (NCT00676338)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-0.24
Metformin-0.22
Pioglitazone0.09
Sitagliptin-0.01

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Serum Glucose (FSG) From Baseline to Week 26

Change in FSG from baseline to Week 26. (NCT00676338)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-2.25
Metformin-1.98
Pioglitazone-2.57
Sitagliptin-1.13

[back to top]

Change in Fasting High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) From Baseline to Week 26

Change in Fasting HDL from baseline to Week 26. (NCT00676338)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly0.01
Metformin0.07
Pioglitazone0.17
Sitagliptin0.04

[back to top]

Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 26.

Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure from baseline to Week 26. (NCT00676338)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-0.50
Metformin-0.86
Pioglitazone-2.50
Sitagliptin-0.45

[back to top]

Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

Safety endpoints: Incidence and severity of events related to islet infusion, immunosuppression, and islet preparations (NCT00679042)
Timeframe: From first islet transplant through one year after last transplant (maximum 3 infusions possible), an average of 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TEAESerious TEAETEAEs rated as severe or beyondTEAEs leading to death or discontinuation
Treatment2111160

[back to top]

Reduction in Hypoglycemic Severity Measured by %Reduction in HYPO Score

%reduction in Ryan HYPO Score [%(baseline score - 1-year post transplant score)/baseline] at time of evaluation. (NCT00679042)
Timeframe: One year after the first and last transplant

Interventionpercentage of HYPO baseline (Mean)
% Reduction from baseline to first tx day 365% Reduction from baseline to last tx day 365
Treatment66.190.1

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Reaching the Efficacy Goal

"A successful primary endpoint was defined as HbA1c ≤ 6.5% at the one-year follow-up visit and absence of severe hypoglycemic events (SHE) from Day 28 post-first transplant to 1 year after first and last transplant.~The primary analysis was to estimate the true rate of the composite favorable outcome at 1 year following first and last transplant in patients in the ITT population." (NCT00679042)
Timeframe: One year after islet transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Success at 1 yr post first transplantSuccess at 1 yr post last transplant
Treatment811

[back to top]

Number of Patients Presenting With Insulin Independence at Day 365 Post First and Last Transplant

"Number of patients presenting with insulin independence, including:~Absence of exogenous insulin injection reported at Day 365.~Fasting capillary glucose level not exceeding 140 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L) more than 3 times in a week (based on measuring capillary glucose levels a minimum of 7 times in a 7-day period) at Day 365 ± 28 days.~Fasting plasma glucose level ≤ 126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L) at Day 365 ± 28 days (if the fasting plasma glucose level is > 126 mg/dL [7.0 mmol/L], it must have been confirmed in an additional 1 out of 2 measurements).~Two-hour post-prandial capillary glucose not exceeding 180 mg/dL (10.0 mmol/L) more than 1 out of every 7 times in a week (based on measuring capillary glucose levels a minimum of 7 times in a 7-day period) at Day 365 ± 28 days.~Evidence of endogenous insulin production defined as fasting or stimulated C-peptide levels ≥ 0.5 ng/mL (0.16 nmol/L) at Day 365 ± 28 days" (NCT00679042)
Timeframe: 1 year after islet infusion

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
First Tx Day 365 Absence of exogenous insulinLast Tx Day 365 Absence of exogenous insulinFirst Tx Day 365 Fasting capillary glucose in a week not exceeding 140 mg/dL more than 3XLast Tx Day 365 Fasting capillary glucose in a week not exceeding 140 mg/dL more than 3XFirst Tx Day 365 Fasting plasma glucose ≤126 mg/dLLast Tx Day 365 Fasting plasma glucose ≤126 mg/dLFirst Tx Day 365 Post-prandial capillary glucose in a week: Not exceeding 180 mg/dL more than 1X/7XLast Tx Day 365 Post-prandial capillary glucose in a week: Not exceeding 180 mg/dL more than 1X/7XFirst Tx Day 365 C-peptide (fasting or stimulated) ≥0.5 ng/mLLast Tx Day 365 C-peptide (fasting or stimulated) ≥0.5 ng/mL
Treatment1012741011531010

[back to top]

Hypoglycemic Episodes by HYPO Score

"Hypoglycemic episodes will be measured by the Ryan hypoglycemic (HYPO) Score derived from the number and severity of hypoglycemic episodes recorded throughout the follow-up phase from Day 28 to Day 365.~(From Ryan et al., 2004) A HYPO score was generated based on a combination of scores from the 4 weeks of readings and the patients' self-reported episodes over the previous year using the scoring system found in online appendix 2 (available at http://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org). The record sheets returned by the patients were analyzed for the number of episodes of glucose values recorded as <2.5 mmol/l and between 2.5 and 2.9 mmol/l. Points were awarded if symptoms were absent or were neuroglycopenic rather than autonomic... Thus the more severe the problem with hypoglycemia, the higher the score. A Ryan score ranges from 0 (no event) to a cumulative sum of episode points of total events reported during the 4 weeks then multiplied by 13 to provide a 1-year value." (NCT00679042)
Timeframe: One year after the last transplant

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Baseline (pre-Tx)First Tx Day 365Last Tx Day 365
Treatment26640.618.7

[back to top]

Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to 6 Months

Change in triglycerides (NCT00701935)
Timeframe: baseline, 6 months

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide BID-0.17
Placebo0.06

[back to top]

Change in Weight From Baseline to 6 Months

Change in weight (NCT00701935)
Timeframe: baseline, 6 months

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide BID-2.54
Placebo-0.33

[back to top]

Percentage Change in Abdominal Visceral Fat From Baseline to 6 Months

Percentage change in abdominal visceral fat (NCT00701935)
Timeframe: baseline, 6 months

Intervention% change (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide BID-5.28
Placebo-4.30

[back to top]

Percentage Change in Subcutaneous Abdominal Fat From Baseline to 6 Months

Percentage change in subcutaneous abdominal fat (NCT00701935)
Timeframe: baseline, 6 months

Intervention% change (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide BID-7.27
Placebo-3.56

[back to top]

Percentage Change in Total Abdominal Fat From Baseline to 6 Months

Percentage change in total abdominal fat (NCT00701935)
Timeframe: baseline, 6 months

Intervention% change (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide BID-5.81
Placebo-3.74

[back to top]

Assessment of Event Rate of Treatment- Emergent Hypoglycemic Event

All hypoglycemia episodes defined as major (results in loss of consciousness, seizure or coma resolving after administration of glucagon or glucose OR needing third-party assistance to resolve due to severe impairment in consciousness and associated with glucose concentration < 2.8 mol/L.) or minor (non-major event with symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia and glucose value < 2.8 mmol/L prior to treating) or symptoms of hypoglycemia (does not meet the criteria for a major or minor event). (NCT00701935)
Timeframe: baseline, 6 months

Interventionhypoglycemia rate/year (Mean)
Exenatide BID0.41
Placebo0.12

[back to top]

Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 6 Months

Change in Diastolic blood pressure (NCT00701935)
Timeframe: baseline, 6 months

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Exenatide BID-2.86
Placebo-0.18

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline to 6 Months

Change in Fasting plasma glucose (NCT00701935)
Timeframe: baseline, 6 months

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide BID-1.47
Placebo-0.08

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <=7.0% at 6 Months

Percentage of patients with HbA1c values <= 7.0% measured at 6 months. HbA1c is a measurement of the amount of hemogobin that is glycosylated. (NCT00701935)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Exenatide BID60.7
Placebo21.4

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to 6 Months

Change in HbA1c from baseline to 6 months. HbA1c is a measurement of the amount of hemogobin that is glycosylated. (NCT00701935)
Timeframe: baseline, 6 months

Intervention% change (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide BID-0.69
Placebo0.19

[back to top]

Change in High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol From Baseline to 6 Months

Change in HDL cholesterol (NCT00701935)
Timeframe: baseline, 6 months

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide BID0.06
Placebo0.04

[back to top]

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 6 Months

Change in Systolic blood pressure (NCT00701935)
Timeframe: baseline, 6 months

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Exenatide BID-7.48
Placebo1.79

[back to top]

Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to 6 Months

Change in total cholesterol (NCT00701935)
Timeframe: baseline, 6 months

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide BID-0.06
Placebo0.14

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than 7% at Week 24

The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug, on or before Visit 11 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 11 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT00707031)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Lixisenatide48.5
Exenatide49.8

[back to top]

Absolute Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 24

Absolute Change = HbA1c value at Week 24 minus HbA1c value at baseline. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug, on or before Visit 11 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 11 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT00707031)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercentage of hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Lixisenatide-0.79
Exenatide-0.96

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 24

Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug, on or before Visit 11 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 11 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT00707031)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionkilogram (Least Squares Mean)
Lixisenatide-2.96
Exenatide-3.98

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24

Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to 1 day after the last dose of study drug, on or before Visit 11 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 11 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT00707031)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Lixisenatide-1.22
Exenatide-1.45

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Requiring Rescue Therapy During Main 24-Week Period

Routine fasting self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) and central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after week 12) values were used to determine the requirement of rescue medication. If fasting SMPG value exceeded the specified limit for 3 consecutive days, the central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after week 12) were performed. Threshold values - from baseline to Week 8: fasting SMPG/FPG >270 milligram/deciliter (mg/dL) (15.0 mmol/L), from Week 8 to Week 12: fasting SMPG/FPG >240 mg/dL (13.3 mmol/L), and from Week 12 to Week 24: fasting SMPG/FPG >200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) or HbA1c > 8.5%. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT00707031)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Lixisenatide2.2
Exenatide3.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With at Least 5% Weight Loss From Baseline at Week 24

The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug, on or before Visit 11 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 11 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT00707031)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Lixisenatide25.1
Exenatide31.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than or Equal to 6.5% at Week 24

The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug, on or before Visit 11 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 11 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT00707031)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Lixisenatide28.5
Exenatide35.4

[back to top]

Quality of Life: Change From Baseline in Patient's Satisfaction to Treatment (PAGI-QOL) at Week 24

PAGI-QOL: a 30-item self-administered questionnaire to measure health related QOL of patients with upper gastrointestinal disorders during past 2 weeks. Consists of 5 sub-scales. Each item rated on a 0-5 point Likert scale (0 [none of the time] to 5 [all the time]). Sub-scale score calculated by dividing sum of all items of subscale by number of items in the sub-scale. Total score calculated by taking mean of sub-scale scores. Sub-scale score and total score ranges from 0=none of the time (lowest score) to 5=all of the time (highest score) with lower scores indicating better QOL. The on-treatment period for this variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug, on or before Visit 11 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 11 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT00707031)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Lixisenatide-0.09
Exenatide-0.06

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Symptomatic Hypoglycemia and Severe Symptomatic Hypoglycemia

Symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event with clinical symptoms that were considered to result from a hypoglycemic episode with an accompanying plasma glucose less than 60 mg/dL (3.3 mmol/L) or associated with prompt recovery after oral carbohydrate, intravenous glucose, or glucagon administration if no plasma glucose measurement was available. Severe symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event with clinical symptoms that were considered to result from hypoglycemia in which the patient required the assistance of another person and was associated with either a plasma glucose level below 36 mg/dL (2.0 mmol/L) or prompt recovery after oral carbohydrate, intravenous glucose, or glucagon administration, if no plasma glucose measurement was available. (NCT00707031)
Timeframe: First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration, for up to 116 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Symptomatic HypoglycemiaSevere Symptomatic Hypoglycemia
Exenatide460
Lixisenatide160

[back to top]

Episodes of Hypoglycemia (Overall)

Number of episodes of hypoglycemia experienced overall during the study (NCT00729326)
Timeframe: 4 weeks and 8 weeks

Interventionepisodes of hypoglycemia (Number)
Exenatide3
Sitagliptin1

[back to top]

Episodes of Hypoglycemia (Week 4 to Week 8)

Number of episodes of hypoglycemia experienced between week 4 and week 8 of the study (NCT00729326)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionepisodes of hypoglycemia (Number)
Exenatide2
Sitagliptin0

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Experiencing Hypoglycemia (Week 4 to Week 8)

Percentage of patients experiencing minor hypoglycemia with a confirmed glucose <54mg/dL (NCT00729326)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Exenatide5.7
Sitagliptin0.0

[back to top]

Change in Postprandial C-peptide AUC After the Morning Meal

Change in postprandial C-peptide AUC after the morning meal (t=0 to 4 hours) (i.e., postprandial C-peptide AUC after the morning meal at baseline minus postprandial C-peptide AUC after the morning meal at endpoint) (NCT00729326)
Timeframe: baseline and 8 Weeks

Interventionnmol*hours/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide-1.78
Sitagliptin0.25

[back to top]

Change in Postprandial C-peptide AUC Excursion After the Morning Meal

Change in Postprandial C-peptide AUC excursion after the morning meal (t=0 to 4 hours) (i.e., postprandial C-peptide AUC excursion after the morning meal at baseline minus postprandial C-peptide AUC excursion after the morning meal at endpoint) (NCT00729326)
Timeframe: baseline and 8 Weeks

Interventionnmol*hours/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide-2.83
Sitagliptin0.14

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Blood Glucose After the Morning Meal

Change in fasting blood glucose after the morning meal from baseline to endpoint (i.e., fasting blood glucose after the morning meal at baseline minus fasting blood glucose after the morning meal at endpoint) (NCT00729326)
Timeframe: baseline and 8 Weeks

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide-28.93
Sitagliptin-28.22

[back to top]

Change in Postprandial Active GLP-1 AUC After the Morning Meal

Change in Postprandial active GLP-1 AUC after the morning meal (t=0 to 4 hours) (i.e., postprandial active GLP-1 AUC after the morning meal at baseline minus postprandial active GLP-1 AUC after the morning meal at endpoint) (NCT00729326)
Timeframe: baseline and 8 Weeks

Interventionpmol*hours/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide-14.28
Sitagliptin47.37

[back to top]

Change in Postprandial Active GLP-1 AUC Excursion After the Monrning Meal

Change in Postprandial active GLP-1 AUC excursion after the morning meal (t=0 to 4 hours) (i.e., postprandial active GLP-1 AUC excursion after the morning meal at baseline minus postprandial active GLP-1 AUC excursion after the morning meals at endpoint) (NCT00729326)
Timeframe: baseline and 8 Weeks

Interventionpmol*hours/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide-14.04
Sitagliptin23.53

[back to top]

Change in Postprandial Glucagon Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) After the Morning Meal

Change in Postprandial Glucagon AUC after the morning meal (t=0 to 4 hours) (i.e., Glucagon AUC over the first 4 hours following the morning meal at baseline minus glucagon AUC over the first 4 hours following the morning meal at endpoint) (NCT00729326)
Timeframe: baseline and 8 Weeks

Interventionpmol*hours/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide-29.60
Sitagliptin-16.91

[back to top]

Change in Postprandial Glucagon AUC Excursion After the Morning Meal

Change in postprandial glucagon AUC excursion after the morning meal (t=0 to 4 hours) (i.e., glucagon AUC excursion for 4 hours following the morning meal at baseline minus glucagon AUC excursion for 4 hours following the morning meal at endpoint) (NCT00729326)
Timeframe: baseline and 8 Weeks

Interventionpmol*hours/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide-30.94
Sitagliptin-14.93

[back to top]

Change in Postprandial Insulin AUC After the Morning Meal

Change in postprandial insulin AUC after the morning meal (t=0 to 4 hours) (i.e., postprandial insulin AUC after the morning meal at baseline minus postprandial insulin AUC after the morning meal at endpoint) (NCT00729326)
Timeframe: baseline and 8 Weeks

Interventionpmol*hours/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide-396.12
Sitagliptin-8.79

[back to top]

Change in Postprandial Insulin AUC Excursion After the Morning Meal

Change in Postprandial insulin AUC excursion after the morning meal (t=0 to 4 hours) (i.e., postprandial insulin AUC excursion after the morning meal at baseline minus postprandial insulin AUC excursion after the morning meal at endpoint) (NCT00729326)
Timeframe: baseline and 8 Weeks

Interventionpmol*hours/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide-525.01
Sitagliptin-34.83

[back to top]

Change in Two-hour Postprandial Glucose After the Morning Meal

Change in 2 hour post-prandial glucose after the morning meal from baseline to endpoint (i.e., glucose level 2 hours after the morning meal at baseline minus glucose level 2 hours after the morning meal at endpoint) (NCT00729326)
Timeframe: baseline and 8 Weeks

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide-108.35
Sitagliptin-44.43

[back to top]

Change in Time-averaged Glucose During a 24 Hour Period

Change in time-averaged glucose during a 24-hour period from baseline to endpoint (i.e., time-averaged glucose over 24 hours at endpoint minus time-averaged glucose over 24 hours at baseline). (NCT00729326)
Timeframe: baseline and 8 Weeks

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide-41.65
Sitagliptin-29.56

[back to top]

Change in Postprandial Triglyceride AUC Excursion After the Morning Meal

Change in postprandial triglyceride AUC excursion after the morning meal (t=0 to 4 hours) (i.e., postprandial triglyceride AUC excursion after the morning meal at baseline minus postprandial triglyceride AUC excursion after the morning meal at endpoint) (NCT00729326)
Timeframe: baseline and 8 Weeks

Interventionmg*hours/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide-108.16
Sitagliptin-41.39

[back to top]

Change in Postprandial Triglyceride AUC After the Morning Meal

Change in postprandial triglyceride AUC after the morning meal (t=0 to 4 hours) (i.e., postprandial triglyceride AUC after the morning meal at baseline minus postprandial triglyceride AUC after the morning meal at endpoint) (NCT00729326)
Timeframe: baseline and 8 Weeks

Interventionmg*hours/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide0.83
Sitagliptin0.87

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Experiencing Hypoglycemia (Baseline to Week 4)

Percentage of patients experiencing minor hypoglycemia with a confirmed glucose <54mg/dL (NCT00729326)
Timeframe: 4 Weeks

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Exenatide2.9
Sitagliptin2.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Experiencing Hypoglycemia (Overall)

Percentage of patients experiencing minor hypoglycemia with a confirmed glucose <54mg/dL (NCT00729326)
Timeframe: 4 weeks and 8 weeks

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Exenatide4.3
Sitagliptin1.4

[back to top]

Episodes of Hypoglycemia (Baseline to Week 4)

Number of episodes of hypoglycemia experienced during the first 4 weeks of the study (NCT00729326)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionepisodes of hypoglycemia (Number)
Exenatide1
Sitagliptin1

[back to top]

Median Glucose Values From Steady State Through 48 Hours or Until Discharge.

Time to steady state was defined as the time from the initiation of drug infusion to first glucose value that is ≤140 mg/dl. Median glucose values were then calculated for each patient from the start of steady state through 48 hours or until discharge. (NCT00736229)
Timeframe: 1-48 hours

Interventionmg/dL (Median)
Exenatide132
Moderate127
Intensive105

[back to top]

Serious Adverse Events (Death, Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction, and Non-fatal Stroke Through 30 Days)

(NCT00736229)
Timeframe: 30 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Exenatide4

[back to top]

Time to Steady State

Time to steady state was defined as the time from the initiation of drug infusion (Exenatide or Insulin) to first glucose value that is ≤140 mg/dl. (NCT00736229)
Timeframe: Start of infusion through 48 hours or until discharge

Interventionhours (Median)
Exenatide2.0
Moderate12.0
Intensive3.0

[back to top]

Rates of Hypoglycemia and Severe Hypoglycemia

Total number of patients having at least one hypoglycemic episode (blood glucose less than 70 mg/dl), including episodes classified as severe (blood glucose less than 50 mg/dl) (NCT00736229)
Timeframe: 1-48 hours

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Patients with at least one hypoglycemic episodePatients with at least one severe episode
Exenatide40
Intensive221
Moderate142

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 52

Change in body weight from baseline to endpoint (NCT00753896)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionkg (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-1.50

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Serum Glucose From Baseline to Week 52

Change in fasting serum glucose from baseline to endpoint (NCT00753896)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-1.59

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 52

Change in HbA1c from baseline to endpoint (NCT00753896)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionpercentage of total hemoglobin (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-0.78

[back to top]

Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 52

Change in Triglycerides from baseline to endpoint (NCT00753896)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-0.19

[back to top]

Assessment of Event Rate of Treatment-Emergent Hypoglycemic Events

Major hypoglycemia: any episode with symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia that resulted in loss of consciousness or seizure with prompt recovery in response to administration of glucagon or glucose OR documented hypoglycemia (blood glucose <3.0 mmol/L [54 mg/dL]) and required the assistance of another person. Minor hypoglycemia: any sign or symptom associated with hypoglycemia that is either self-treated by the patient or resolves on its own AND has a concurrent finger stick blood glucose <3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) and not classified as major hypoglycemia. Mean event rate = total number of events for all subjects in a treatment regimen / the total number of subject years of exposure for all subjects in that treatment. Standard error = square root of (total number of events / (subject years of exposure)**2). (NCT00753896)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

Interventionevents per subject-year (Mean)
Major HypoglycemiaMinor Hypoglycemia
Exenatide Once Weekly0.000.02

[back to top]

Change in Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 52

Change in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure from baseline to endpoint (NCT00753896)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Systolic Blood PressureDiastolic Blood Pressure
Exenatide Once Weekly-1.69-0.19

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Experiencing Adverse Events

Percentage of patients experiencing treatment-emergent adverse events over 52 weeks (NCT00753896)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Exenatide Once Weekly73.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <=7% at Week 52

Percentage of patients achieving HbA1c <=7% at endpoint (for patients with HbA1c >7% at baseline) (NCT00753896)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Exenatide Once Weekly68.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <=6.5% at Week 52

Percentage of patients achieving HbA1c <=6.5% at endpoint (for patients with HbA1c >6.5% at baseline) (NCT00753896)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Exenatide Once Weekly54.2

[back to top]

Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 52

Change in Total Cholesterol from baseline to endpoint (NCT00753896)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-0.18

[back to top]

Change in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) From Baseline to Week 52

Change in HDL from baseline to endpoint (NCT00753896)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly0.04

[back to top]

Change in Triglycerides

Change in triglycerides following 30 weeks of therapy (i.e., triglycerides at week 30 minus triglycerides at baseline) (NCT00765817)
Timeframe: baseline and 30 weeks

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Arm-0.02
Placebo Arm-0.03

[back to top]

Change in Total Cholesterol

Change in total cholesterol following 30 weeks of therapy (i.e., total cholesterol at week 30 minus total cholesterol at baseline) (NCT00765817)
Timeframe: baseline and 30 weeks

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Arm-0.16
Placebo Arm-0.02

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Minor Hypoglycemia

Percentage of subjects in each arm experiencing at least one episode of minor hypoglycemia at any point during the study. Minor hypoglycemia was defined as any time a subject felt he or she was experiencing a sign or symptom associated with hypoglycemia that was either self-treated by the subject or resolved on its own and had a concurrent finger stick blood glucose <3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL). (NCT00765817)
Timeframe: baseline and weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, and 30

Interventionpercentage (Number)
Exenatide Arm24.8
Placebo Arm28.7

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Serum Glucose

Change in fasting serum glucose following 30 weeks of therapy (i.e., fasting serum glucose at week 30 minus fasting serum glucose at baseline) (NCT00765817)
Timeframe: baseline and 30 weeks

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Arm-1.28
Placebo Arm-0.87

[back to top]

Change in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol

Change in HDL cholesterol following 30 weeks of therapy (i.e., HDL cholesterol at week 30 minus HDL cholesterol at baseline) (NCT00765817)
Timeframe: baseline and 30 weeks

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Arm0.01
Placebo Arm0.00

[back to top]

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)

Change in SBP following 30 weeks of therapy (i.e., SBP at week 30 minus SBP at baseline) (NCT00765817)
Timeframe: baseline and 30 weeks

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Arm-2.74
Placebo Arm1.71

[back to top]

Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

Change in HbA1c from baseline following 30 weeks of therapy (i.e., HbA1c at week 30 minus HbA1c at baseline). Unit of measure is percent of hemoglobin that is glycosylated. (NCT00765817)
Timeframe: baseline and 30 weeks

Interventionpercentage of hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Arm-1.71
Placebo Arm-1.00

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight

Change in body weight following 30 weeks of therapy (i.e., body weight at week 30 minus body weight at baseline) (NCT00765817)
Timeframe: baseline and 30 weeks

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Arm-1.78
Placebo Arm0.96

[back to top]

Change in Daily Insulin Dose

Change in daily insulin dose following 30 weeks of therapy (i.e., daily insulin dose at week 30 minus daily insulin dose at baseline) (NCT00765817)
Timeframe: baseline and 30 weeks

Interventioninsulin units (U) (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Arm13.19
Placebo Arm19.71

[back to top]

Change in 7-point Self-monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Profile

Change in 7-point (pre-breakfast, 2 hour post-breakfast, pre-lunch, 2 hour post-lunch, pre-dinner, 2 hour post-dinner, 0300 hours) SMBG profile from baseline to week 30 (change = blood glucose value at week 30 minus blood glucose value at baseline) (NCT00765817)
Timeframe: baseline and 30 weeks

,
Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Pre-breakfast: baselinePre-breakfast: change at week 302 hour post-breakfast: baseline2 hour post-breakfast: change at week 30Pre-lunch: baselinePre-lunch: change at week 302 hour post-lunch: baseline2 hour post-lunch: change at week 30Pre-dinner: baselinePre-dinner: change at week 302 hour post-dinner: baseline2 hour post-dinner: change at week 300300: baseline0300: change at week 30
Exenatide Arm7.89-1.5810.89-3.568.95-2.2311.35-2.749.85-2.2512.03-3.878.95-2.27
Placebo Arm8.27-1.4811.82-1.729.77-1.1511.70-1.389.99-1.3311.86-1.349.20-1.48

[back to top]

Change in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol

Change in LDL cholesterol following 30 weeks of therapy (i.e., LDL cholesterol at week 30 minus LDL cholesterol at baseline) (NCT00765817)
Timeframe: baseline and 30 weeks

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Arm-0.19
Placebo Arm-0.00

[back to top]

Change in Waist Circumference

Change in waist circumference following 30 weeks of therapy (i.e., waist circumference at week 30 minus waist circumference at baseline) (NCT00765817)
Timeframe: baseline and 30 weeks

Interventioncm (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Arm-1.08
Placebo Arm-0.25

[back to top]

Change in Daily Insulin Dose (on a Per Body Weight Basis)

Change in daily insulin dose per kilogram (kg) following 30 weeks of therapy (i.e., daily insulin dose per kg at week 30 minus daily insulin dose per kg at baseline) (NCT00765817)
Timeframe: baseline and 30 weeks

Interventioninsulin units per kg (U/kg) (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Arm0.15
Placebo Arm0.20

[back to top]

Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)

Change in DBP following 30 weeks of therapy (i.e., DBP at week 30 minus DBP at baseline) (NCT00765817)
Timeframe: baseline and 30 weeks

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Arm-1.73
Placebo Arm1.69

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <=7%

Percentage of patients in each arm who had HbA1c >7% at baseline and had HbA1c <=7% at week 30 (percentage = [number of subjects with HbA1c <=7% at week 30 divided by number of subjects with HbA1c >7% at baseline] * 100%). (NCT00765817)
Timeframe: baseline and 30 weeks

Interventionpercentage (Number)
Exenatide Arm58.3
Placebo Arm31.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <=6.5%

Percentage of patients in each arm who had HbA1c >6.5% at baseline and had HbA1c <=6.5% at week 30 (percentage = [number of subjects with HbA1c <=6.5% at week 30 divided by number of subjects with HbA1c >6.5% at baseline] * 100%). (NCT00765817)
Timeframe: baseline and 30 weeks

Interventionpercentage (Number)
Exenatide Arm42.0
Placebo Arm13.3

[back to top]

Minor Hypoglycemia Rate Per Year

Number of minor hypoglycemia events experienced per subject per year. Minor hypoglycemia was defined as any time a subject felt he or she was experiencing a sign or symptom associated with hypoglycemia that was either self-treated by the subject or resolved on its own and had a concurrent finger stick blood glucose <3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL). (NCT00765817)
Timeframe: baseline and weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, and 30

Interventionevents per subject per year (Mean)
Exenatide Arm1.61
Placebo Arm1.55

[back to top]

Effect on Functional Beta-cell Mass as Determined by Change in ß-cell Secretory Capacity at 6 Months (μU/ml)

The acute insulin response to arginine (AIRarg) performed during the 340mg/dl glucose clamp allows for estimation of the the beta-cell secretory capacity (AIRmax) or functional beta-cell mass. Changes from baseline to 6 months of AIRmax were compared across groups (NCT00775684)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

,,
InterventionμU/ml (Mean)
Acute Insulin Response (AIRmax)BaselineAcute Insulin Response (AIRmax) 6 Months
Exenatide214188.5
Glimepiride133202.5
Sitagliptin149158.3

[back to top]

PG 50 (the Plasma Glucose Level at Which Half-maximal Insulin Secretion is Achieved During the Glucose-potentiated Arginine Test) at Baseline and 6 Months

Between ∼60 and 250 mg/dL, the magnitude of AIRarg is a linear function of the plasma glucose level, so the difference in AIRarg at fasting and 230 mg/dL glucose levels divided by the difference in plasma glucose (ΔAIRarg/ΔPG) gives the glucose-potentiation slope (GPS) (8,24-26). Using the y-intercept (b) from the line created by these two points, the plasma glucose level at which half-maximal insulin secretion is achieved (PG50) is derived from solving the equation 1/2 (AIRmax) = (GPS · PG50) + b, and provides a measure of β-cell sensitivity to glucose The mean difference after 6 months in PG 50 were compared. Listed below are the PG50 values at baseline and 6 months. (NCT00775684)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
PG50 BaselinePG50 6 Months
P50 Exenatide175190
P50 Glimepiride168182
P50 Sitagliptin226209

[back to top]

Change in Acute Insulin Response to Arginine. (AIRarg)

The changes in B-cell insulin secretion, Acute Insulin Response to arginine (AIRarg) after 6 months were compared to baseline AIRarg for each group. Listed below are AIRarg at baseline and 6 months for each group. (NCT00775684)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

,,
InterventionuU/mL (Mean)
Acute Insulin Response (AIRarg) BaselineAcute Insulin Response (AIRarg) 6 Months
AIRarg Exenatide5252
AIRarg Glimepiride4442
AIRarg Sitagliptin3534

[back to top]

Effect on Functional Beta-cell Mass as Determined by Change in ß-cell Secretory Capacity at 6 Months (pg/mL)

AGRmin is performed during the 340mg/dl glucose clamp allows for estimation of the minimum alpha-cell glucagon secretion. Changes from baseline to 6 months of AGRmin were compared across groups. (NCT00775684)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

,,
Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Acute Glucose Response (AGRmin) BaselineAcute Glucose Response (AGRmin) 6 Months
Exenatide5152
Glimepiride3759
Sitagliptin5559

[back to top]

Insulin Sensitivity at Baseline and 6 Months

Insulin sensitivity (M/I) was determined by dividing the mean glucose infusion rate required during the 230 mg/dL glucose clamp (M) by the mean prestimulus insulin level (I) between 40 and 45 min of the glucose infusion The mean difference after 6 months in insulin sensitivity (M/I) were compared (NCT00775684)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

,,
Intervention((mg/kg) /min) /uU/mL (Mean)
M/I BaselineM/I 6 Months
M/I Exenatide0.30.3
M/I Glimepiride0.30.3
M/I Sitagliptin0.30.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Insulin Concentration

(NCT00782418)
Timeframe: Pre and Post glucose infusion

InterventionμIU(insulin)/mL (Least Squares Mean)
HGC - Exenatide 5 μg592
HGC - Exenatide 1.5 μg293
HGC - Placebo46.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Insulin Secretion Rate (ISR) Normalized to Ambient Plasma Glucose

"Comparison of Glucose Dependent Insulin Secretion (GDIS) measured after HGC at steady-state to GDIS measured after GGI at the highest glucose infusion rate.~Insulin Secretion Rate (ISR)/ Blood Glucose (BG)" (NCT00782418)
Timeframe: Steady-state of HGC: 90 - 120 minutes post dose; highest glucose infusion rate of GGI: 120 - 160 minutes post dose

Intervention(ng/min) / (mg/dL) (Geometric Mean)
HGC - Exenatide 5 μg2.14
HGC - Exenatide 1.5 μg1.49
HGC - Placebo0.53
GGI - Exenatide 5 μg2.95
GGI - Exenatide 1.5 μg2.07
GGI - Placebo0.71

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in C-peptide Concentration

(NCT00782418)
Timeframe: Pre and Post glucose infusion

Interventionng/mL (Least Squares Mean)
HGC - Exenatide 5 μg29.3
HGC - Exenatide 1.5 μg22.6
HGC - Placebo6.24

[back to top]

Change in Aortic Stiffness, as Measured by the Change in the Mean Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity

(NCT00799435)
Timeframe: Measured at Week 12

,
Interventionm/sec (Mean)
Baseline Pulse Wave VelocityFollow-up Pulse Wave Velocity
Exenatide9.310.2
Usual Care11.4NA

[back to top]

HbA1c

change in HbA1c was measured before and after treatment in three groups (NCT00845182)
Timeframe: baseline and 6 months

Interventionpercent point decrease from baseline (Mean)
Pioglitazone1.37
Exenatide1.09
Drug Pioglitazone and Drug Exentatide1.91

[back to top]

Effect of Pioglitazone, Exenatide and Combined Pioglitazone and Exenatide on Body Weight

Effect of Pioglitazone, Exenatide and combined Pioglitazone and Exenatide on body weight and beta cell function (NCT00845182)
Timeframe: baseline and 6 months

Interventionkg (Mean)
PIOGLITAZONE5.5
EXENATIDE2.4
PIOGLITAZONE and EXNATIDE2.7

[back to top]

Change in Weight From Baseline to Endpoint.

Change in weight from baseline to endpoint in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (all subjects who took at least one dose of study medication and had one post-baseline evaluation). (NCT00845507)
Timeframe: 16 Weeks

InterventionPounds (Mean)
Exenatide Group-1.1
Placebo Group5.9

[back to top]

Change in Body Mass Index (BMI) From Baseline to Endpoint.

Secondary outcome measures included change in body mass index (BMI). (NCT00845507)
Timeframe: 16 Weeks

InterventionKgs/meter squared (Mean)
Exenatide Group-0.2
Placebo Group1.0

[back to top]

Confirmed Clinical Neuropathy (CCN)

CCN was defined by a composite score comprised of at least two positive responses among symptoms, sensory signs, or absent or hypoactive reflexes consistent with a distal symmetrical polyneuropathy (16), and at least one abnormal nerve conduction study result in two anatomically distinct nerves, e.g. the sural sensory and peroneal motor nerves (defined as a amplitude < 5 μV and a conduction velocity < 40 m/sec for the sural nerve and an amplitude < 2.5 μV and a conduction velocity < 40 m/sec for the peroneal nerve). (NCT00855439)
Timeframe: 18 Months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Exenatide14
Glargine18

[back to top]

Cardiac Autonomic Neuropathy (CAN)

Group differences in E/I ratio, a measure of cardiac autonomic function. (NCT00855439)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionunit-less measure (Mean)
Exenatide1.1
Glargine1.1

[back to top]

Cardiac Autonomic Neuropathy

resting heart rate as marker of autonomic function at rest (NCT00855439)
Timeframe: 18 month

Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
Exenatide70
Glargine77

[back to top]

Intra-epidermal Nerve Fiber Density

Exploratory endpoint: Regeneration of intra-epidermal nerve fibers after denervation by capsiacin. (NCT00855439)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionnerve fibers per mm of skin (Mean)
Exenatide2.1
Glargine4.6

[back to top]

Energy Intake

Mean of 3-day food intake change between 3 days (Day 6-7-8) at baseline assessment and 3 days (Day 12-13-14) during the intervention period between the exenatide and placebo groups (NCT00856609)
Timeframe: Day 6-7-8 (at baseline) and Day 12-13-14 (3 days after starting study intervention)

Interventionkcal/day (Mean)
Exenatide1016.1
Placebo245.1

[back to top]

Body Weight

Mean decrease between pre- and post-randomization in 5 Weeks between the exenatide and placebo groups. (NCT00856609)
Timeframe: 5 weeks

Interventionkg (Mean)
Exenatide1.6
Placebo0.27

[back to top]

Twenty-four-hour Energy Expenditure

Change of twenty-four-hour energy expenditure between at Day 5 at baseline assessment and at Day 11 two days after starting study medication between the exenatide and placebo groups (NCT00856609)
Timeframe: Day 5 and Day 11

Interventionkcal/day (Mean)
Exenatide51.6
Placebo28.9

[back to top]

Incidence of Hypoglycemia (Overall)

Incidence of hypoglycemic episodes experienced overall during the study (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Exenatide + Placebo5
Exenatide + Sitagliptin10

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight (kg)

Change in body weight from baseline to endpoint (Week 20) (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide + Placebo-2.58
Exenatide + Sitagliptin-2.20

[back to top]

Change in FSG (mmol/L)

Change in fasting serum glucose (FSG) from baseline to endpoint (Week 20) (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide + Placebo0.06
Exenatide + Sitagliptin-0.55

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c (Percent)

Change in HbA1c from baseline to endpoint (Week 20); difference of base percent values [X% - Y%] (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

InterventionPercent HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide + Placebo-0.38
Exenatide + Sitagliptin-0.68

[back to top]

Change in HDL (mmol/L)

Change in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol from baseline to endpoint (Week 20) (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide + Placebo-0.03
Exenatide + Sitagliptin-0.01

[back to top]

Change in LDL (mmol/L)

Change in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol from baseline to endpoint (Week 20) (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide + Placebo0.06
Exenatide + Sitagliptin0.10

[back to top]

Change in Total Cholesterol (mmol/L)

Change in total cholesterol from baseline to endpoint (Week 20) (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide + Placebo0.09
Exenatide + Sitagliptin0.08

[back to top]

Change in Triglycerides (mmol/L)

Change in triglycerides from baseline to endpoint (Week 20) (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide + Placebo0.17
Exenatide + Sitagliptin-0.07

[back to top]

Change in Waist Circumference (cm)

Change in waist circumference from baseline to endpoint (Week 20) (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

Interventioncm (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide + Placebo-3.25
Exenatide + Sitagliptin-2.36

[back to top]

Incidence of Confirmed Hypoglycemia(Overall)

Incidence of confirmed hypoglycemia experienced overall during the study (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Exenatide + Placebo1
Exenatide + Sitagliptin2

[back to top]

Incidence of Nocturnal Hypoglycemia (Overall)

Incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia experienced overall during the study (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Exenatide + Placebo0
Exenatide + Sitagliptin3

[back to top]

Incidence of Severe Hypoglycemia(Overall)

Incidence of severe hypoglycemia experienced overall during the study (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Exenatide + Placebo1
Exenatide + Sitagliptin0

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <=7.0%

Percentage of patients whose baseline HbA1c was > 7.0% achieving HbA1c <=7.0% at endpoint (Week 20) (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

InterventionPercentage (Number)
Exenatide + Placebo29.5
Exenatide + Sitagliptin44.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <7.0%

Percentage of patients whose baseline HbA1c was >=7.0% achieving HbA1c <7.0% at endpoint (Week 20) (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

InterventionPercentage (Number)
Exenatide + Placebo26.6
Exenatide + Sitagliptin41.7

[back to top]

SMBG (mmol/L)

7 point Self Monitored Blood Glucose Profiles - daily mean value (Week 20) (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide + Placebo8.57
Exenatide + Sitagliptin8.16

[back to top]

Waist-to-Hip Ratio

Change in waist-to-hip ratio from baseline to endpoint (Week20) (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

InterventionRatio (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide + Placebo-0.01
Exenatide + Sitagliptin-0.00

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <=6.5%

Percentage of patients whose baseline HbA1c was > 6.5% achieving HbA1c <=6.5% at endpoint (Week 20) (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

InterventionPercentage (Number)
Exenatide + Placebo16.5
Exenatide + Sitagliptin20.7

[back to top]

Ratio of Triglycerides at Week 24 to Baseline

Ratio of triglycerides (measured in mg/dL) at Week 24 to baseline (Day 1). Log (Postbaseline Triglycerides) - log (Baseline Triglycerides); change from baseline to endpoint is presented as ratio of endpoint to baseline. (NCT00877890)
Timeframe: Day 1, Week 24

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly0.94
Exenatide Twice Daily0.99

[back to top]

Assessment on Event Rate of Treatment-emergent Minor Hypoglycemic Events

The minor hypoglycemia category included events in which symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia were accompanied by a blood glucose concentration of less than 54 mg/dL prior to treatment and not classified as major hypoglycemia. (NCT00877890)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 24

Interventionrate per subject-year (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly With SU0.75
Exenatide Twice Daily With SU0.31
Exenatide Once Weekly No SU0.00
Exenatide Twice Daily No SU0.00

[back to top]

Change in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 24

Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline (Day 1) to Week 24. (NCT00877890)
Timeframe: Day 1, Week 24

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-2.9
Exenatide Twice Daily-1.2

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 24

Change in body weight from baseline (Day 1) to Week 24. (NCT00877890)
Timeframe: Day 1, Week 24

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-2.33
Exenatide Twice Daily-1.37

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline to Week 24

Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline (Day 1) to Week 24. (NCT00877890)
Timeframe: Day 1, Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-25.1
Exenatide Twice Daily-4.6

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 24

Change in HbA1c from baseline (Day 1) to Week 24 [Week 24 - Baseline]. (NCT00877890)
Timeframe: Day 1, Week 24

Interventionpercentage of total hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-1.57
Exenatide Twice Daily-0.90

[back to top]

Change in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 24

Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline (Day 1) to Week 24. (NCT00877890)
Timeframe: Day 1, Week 24

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly0.2
Exenatide Twice Daily-0.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Target of <7%

Percentages of subjects achieving HbA1c target value of <7% at Week 24. (NCT00877890)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Exenatide Once Weekly58.1
Exenatide Twice Daily30.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Target of <=6.5%

Percentages of subjects achieving HbA1c target values of <=6.5% at Week 24. (NCT00877890)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Exenatide Once Weekly41.1
Exenatide Twice Daily16.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Achieving Fasting Plasma Glucose Target of <=126 mg/dL

Percentages of subjects achieving fasting plasma glucose target of <=126 mg/dL at Week 24. (NCT00877890)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Exenatide Once Weekly50.4
Exenatide Twice Daily30.9

[back to top]

Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 24

Change in total cholesterol from baseline (Day 1) to Week 24. (NCT00877890)
Timeframe: Day 1, Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-15.4
Exenatide Twice Daily0.6

[back to top]

Change in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) From Baseline to Week 24

Change in HDL from baseline (Day 1) to Week 24. (NCT00877890)
Timeframe: Day 1, Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly0.0
Exenatide Twice Daily1.3

[back to top]

Assessment on Event Rate of Treatment-emergent Major Hypoglycemic Events

The major hypoglycemia category included events that, in the judgment of the investigator or physician, resulted in loss of consciousness, seizure, coma, or other change in mental status consistent with neuroglycopenia, in which symptoms resolved after administration of intramuscular glucagon or intravenous glucose, required third-party assistance, and was accompanied by a blood glucose concentration of less than 54 mg/dL prior to treatment, whether or not symptoms of hypoglycemia were perceived by the subject. (NCT00877890)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 24

Interventionrate per subject-year (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly With SU0.00
Exenatide Twice Daily With SU0.00
Exenatide Once Weekly No SU0.00
Exenatide Twice Daily No SU0.00

[back to top]

The Primary Objective is to Determine the Ability of Intravenous Exenatide to: Maintain Intraoperative Euglycemia in Subjects With Initial Blood Glucose < 126 mg/dL in Surgical Subjects as Compared to Placebo,

Logistic regression analysis will be utizlized to determine maintenance of euglycemia (yes v no) for our primary analysis. A standard area under the curve (AUC) analysis will be performed for each time point to map out drug deposition. Assuming a standard 2 compartment model, 10 subjects per group is sufficient to accurately predict mean AUC. Our primary analysis should provide ample statistical power. (NCT00882050)
Timeframe: Baseline and 90 minutes after starting infusion;

,,
Interventionmlg/dL (Mean)
Pre glucose levelsat 90 minutes post infusion glucose levels
Exenatide 0.41ng/kg/Min108.1125.0
Exentatide 0.27 ng/kg/Min112.3120.3
Placebo IV NSS110.4120.8

[back to top]

Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)

Change in body mass index (BMI) over three months (NCT00886626)
Timeframe: 3-month

Interventionchange in kg/m^2 (Mean)
Exenatide-0.9
Control0.84

[back to top]

Least Square Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) to Week 12 in Participants With Diabetes (Cohort 2) in the ITT Population

HbA1c was measured as a percent of hemoglobin at screening, Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12 or early termination. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was applied to estimate missing values at post baseline timepoints. Baseline=Day 1, last measurement prior to first dose of study drug. (NCT00894322)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 12

InterventionPercent of hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Cohort 2 Exenatide 2 mg-0.87
Cohort 2 Placebo0.08

[back to top]

Average Exenatide Concentration (Cave) of 10 mg Exenatide (Cohort 1) in Healthy Participants in the Pharmacokinetic Evaluable Population

Cohort 1: Blood samples for the assessment of plasma exenatide were collected at time = -15, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 360, and 480 minutes relative to study medication injection at time = 0 on Day 1. At all visits following the single dose, a single blood sample was collected for assessment of exenatide concentrations. Cave(0-168h) was the time-weighted mean concentration over the sampling period from time x to time y corresponding to AUC (0-168h) and was measured in picograms per milliliter (pg/mL). Exenatide concentration was measured using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). PK evaluable population consisted of all ITT participants who had at least 4 detectable plasma exenatide measurements [not less than (<) lower limits of quantification (LLOQ)] from Day 1 to Week 12 and had reliable PK data. (NCT00894322)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 1

Interventionpg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cohort 1 Exenatide 10 mg32.5

[back to top]

AUC (0 Hour to 168 Hour) for 10 mg Exenatide (Cohort 1) in Healthy Participants in the Pharmacokinetic Evaluable Population

Cohort 1: Blood samples for the assessment of plasma exenatide were collected at time = -15, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 360, and 480 minutes relative to study medication injection at time = 0 on Day 1. At all visits following the single injection, a single blood sample was collected for assessment of exenatide concentrations. AUC (0-168 h) data represents average concentration rather than maximum concentration. Exenatide concentration was measured using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). AUC calculated using linear trapezoidal method from time x to time y and measured in pg*h/mL. PK evaluable population consisted of all ITT participants who had at least 4 detectable plasma exenatide measurements (not < LLOQ) from Day 1 to Week 12 and had reliable PK data. (NCT00894322)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 1

Interventionpg*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cohort 1 Exenatide 10 mg3269.6

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of 2 mg Exenatide (Cohort 2) in Participants With Diabetes in Pharmacokinetic Evaluable Population

Cohort 2: Blood samples for the assessment of plasma exenatide were collected on Day 1, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. At Week 10, blood samples were collected at time = -15, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, and 360 minutes relative to study medication injection at time = 0. Tmax was measured in hours (h). Exenatide was measured using a validated ELISA. Tmax summarized at 0-6 h at Week 10, 0-168 h at Weeks 10-11, and 0-tlast at Weeks 10-12. PK evaluable population consisted of all ITT participants who had at least 4 detectable plasma exenatide measurements (not < LLOQ) from Day 1 to Week 12 and had reliable PK data. (NCT00894322)
Timeframe: Week 10, Weeks 10-11, Weeks 10-12

Interventionhours (Geometric Mean)
Tmax 0-6 h Week; n=18Tmax 0-168 h Weeks 10-11; n=18Tmax 0-tlast Weeks 10-12; n=17
Cohort 2 Exenatide 2 mg1.434.360.0

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) for Single Dose of 10 mg Exenatide (Cohort 1) in Healthy Participants in the Pharmacokinetic Evaluable Population

Cohort 1: Blood samples for the assessment of plasma exenatide were collected at time(t) = -15, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 360, and 480 minutes relative to study medication injection at time = 0 on Day 1 an the mean is presented below. At all visits following the single injection, a single blood sample was collected for assessment of exenatide concentrations. Tmax was measured in hours and Tmax (0-8h) and (0-tlast) are presented below. Exenatide concentration was measured using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). PK evaluable population consisted of all ITT participants who had at least 4 detectable plasma exenatide measurements [not less than (<) lower limits of quantification (LLOQ)] and had reliable PK data. (NCT00894322)
Timeframe: Day 1, Week 12

Interventionhours (Geometric Mean)
Tmax (0 to 8 hours), n=27Tmax (0 hour to Week 12), n=30
Cohort 1 Exenatide 10 mg7.0998.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Injection Site TEAEs, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths, and Withdrawals Due to AEs in Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 in Intent to Treat (ITT) Population

Treatment emergent (TE)=occurs during or after treatment with study drug. Adverse Event (AE)=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Participants experiencing multiple episodes of a given AE are counted once. Injection site AEs: adverse events that existed prior to Day 1 and worsened after the first administration at Day 1, or occurred after the first administration at Day 1 through Week 12, or after Study Termination if considered by investigator to be clinically significant. (NCT00894322)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week12

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
TEAEInjection Site TEAEsWithdrawal due to AESAEDeath
Cohort 1 Exenatide 10 mg2616000
Cohort 2 Exenatide 2 mg2218000
Cohort 2 Placebo97010

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Values of Potential Clinical Importance in Cohorts 1 and 2 in ITT Population

Abbreviations: Upper Limit of Normal (ULN); milligram per deciliter (mg/dL); units per liter (U/L); micro liters (µL); creatine kinase (CK); gamma-glutamyltransferase (G-GT). Normal ranges = Hematocrit: 40.6-52.3% (male), 35.3-47.0 (female); Platelets 155-361*10^3/µL(male/female); Calcium: 8.6-10.4 mg/dL (male/female); CK: 43-350 U/L (male), 28-207 U/L (female); G-GT: 7-62 U/L (male/female); Glucose 73-105 mg/dL (male/female); Lipase 14-70 U/L (male/female); Uric acid: 3.5-7.8 mg/dL (male), 2.3-5.9 mg/dL (female). Blood samples for laboratories were collected at screening, Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12 or early termination. Value for potential clinical importance is presented in each category presented below. (NCT00894322)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 12

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Hematocrit low <36%Platelets high <75 to >500*10^3/µ/LCalcium high <8 to >11 mg/dLCK high >3*ULNG-GT high >3*ULN in U/LGlucose low <50 to > 450 mg/dLLipase high >3*ULN in U/LUric Acid high >8.0 mg/dL
Cohort 1 Exenatide 10 mg00010100
Cohort 2 Exenatide 2 mg01100001
Cohort 2 Placebo10001010

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving HbA1c Less Than Equal to (<=) 6.5% and Less Than (<) 7% at Week 12 in Participants With Diabetes (Cohort 2) in the ITT Population

HbA1c was measured as a percent of hemoglobin at screening, Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12 or early termination. LOCF was applied to estimate missing values at post baseline timepoints. Baseline=Day 1, last measurement prior to first dose of study drug. (NCT00894322)
Timeframe: Week 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline HbA1c >= 7%Week 12 HbA1c <= 6.5%Week 12 HbA1c <7%
Cohort 2 Exenatide 2 mg22914
Cohort 2 Placebo1212

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study in Sitting Diastolic and Systolic Blood Pressure in Cohorts 1 and 2 in ITT Population

In Cohort 1, sitting blood pressures were obtained at Screening (Visit 1), Day 1 (Visit 2), Weeks 1-11 (Visits 3-13), Week 12 (Visit 14), and at early termination. Blood pressures (diastolic and systolic) were measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). In Cohort 2, sitting blood pressures were obtained at Screening (Visit 1), Day 1 (Visit 2), Weeks 1-10 (Visits 3-12), Week 11 (Visit 15), Week 12 (Visit 16) and at early termination. Baseline was defined as last measurement prior to first injection of study drug. (NCT00894322)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 12

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Diastolic Blood PressureSystolic Blood Pressure
Cohort 1 Exenatide 10 mg6.2-1.4
Cohort 2 Exenatide 2 mg4.6-8.4
Cohort 2 Placebo6.8-1.7

[back to top]

Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for Single Dose of 10 mg Exenatide (Cohort 1) in Healthy Participants in the Pharmacokinetic Evaluable Population

Cohort 1: Blood samples for the assessment of plasma exenatide were collected at time = -15, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 360, and 480 minutes relative to study medication injection at time = 0 on Day 1 and the mean is presented below. At all visits following the single injection, a single blood sample was collected for assessment of exenatide concentrations. Cmax was measured in picograms per milliliter (pg/mL). Exenatide concentration was measured using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). PK evaluable population consisted of all ITT participants who had at least 4 detectable plasma exenatide measurements [not less than (<) lower limits of quantification (LLOQ)] from Day 1 to Week 12 for the evaluation of the PK characteristics of plasma exenatide and had reliable PK data. Cmax (0-8h) and (0-tlast) are presented below. (NCT00894322)
Timeframe: Day 1, Week 12

Interventionpg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cmax 0 hour to 8 hoursCmax 0 hour to Week 12
Cohort 1 Exenatide 10 mg34.9331.2

[back to top]

Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for 2 mg Exenatide (Cohort 2) in Participants With Diabetes in the Pharmacokinetic Evaluable Population

Cohort 2: Blood samples for the assessment of plasma exenatide were collected on Day 1, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. At Week 10, blood samples were collected at time = -15, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, and 360 minutes relative to study medication injection at time = 0. Cmax was measured in pg/mL. Exenatide was measured using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Cmax summarized at 0-6 h at Week 10, 0-168 h at Weeks 10-11, and 0-tlast at Weeks 10-12. PK evaluable population consisted of all ITT participants who had at least 4 detectable plasma exenatide measurements (not < LLOQ) from Day 1 to Week 12 and had reliable PK data. (NCT00894322)
Timeframe: Week 10, Weeks 10-11, Weeks 10-12

Interventionpg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cmax at 0-6 h Week 10; n=18Cmax at 0-168 h Weeks 10=11; n=18Cmax at 0-tlast Weeks 10-12; n=17
Cohort 2 Exenatide 2 mg304.9362.6410.5

[back to top]

Average Exenatide Concentration (Cave) of 2 mg Exenatide (Cohort 2) in Participants With Diabetes in the Pharmacokinetic Evaluable Population

Cohort 2: Blood samples for the assessment of plasma exenatide were collected on Day 1, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. At Week 10, blood samples were collected at time = -15, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, and 360 minutes relative to study medication injection at time = 0. At all visits following the single injection, a single blood sample was collected for assessment of exenatide concentrations. Cave(0-168h) and Cave(0-tlast) was the time-weighted mean concentration over the sampling period from time x to time y corresponding to AUC (0-168h), and AUC (0-tlast), respectively. Cave was measured in picograms per milliliter (pg/mL). Exenatide concentration was measured using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). PK evaluable population consisted of all ITT participants who had at least 4 detectable plasma exenatide measurements (not < LLOQ) from Day 1 to Week 12 and had reliable PK data. (NCT00894322)
Timeframe: Week 10 - Week 11; Week 10 - Week 12

Interventionpg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cave at Weeks 10-11; n=18Cave at Weeks 10-12; n=17
Cohort 2 Exenatide 2 mg292.7302.4

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Single Dose of 10 mg Exenatide (Cohort 1) in Healthy Participants in the Pharmacokinetic Evaluable Population

Cohort 1: Blood samples for the assessment of plasma exenatide were collected at time = -15, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 360, and 480 minutes relative to study medication injection at time = 0 on Day 1 and the mean is presented below. At all visits following the single injection, a single blood sample was collected for assessment of exenatide concentrations. AUC was measured in picograms * hours per milliliter (pg*hr/mL). Exenatide was measured using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). AUC calculated using linear trapezoidal method from time x to time y; AUC (0-8h) and (0-tlast) are presented below. Pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluable population consisted of all ITT participants who had at least 4 detectable plasma exenatide measurements [not less than (<) lower limits of quantification (LLOQ)] from Day 1 to Week 12 and had reliable PK data. (NCT00894322)
Timeframe: Day 1, Week 12

Interventionpg*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
AUC (0-8h), n=30AUC (0-Week 12), n=30
Cohort 1 Exenatide 10 mg125.6147220.2

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve (AUC) for 2 mg Exenatide (Cohort 2) in Participants With Diabetes in the Pharmacokinetic Evaluable Population

Cohort 2: Blood samples for the assessment of plasma exenatide were collected on Day 1, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. At Week 10, blood samples were collected at time = -15, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, and 360 minutes relative to study medication injection at time = 0. AUC was measured in picograms * hours per milliliter (pg*hr/mL). Exenatide was measured using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). AUC calculated using linear trapezoidal method from time x to time y; AUC (0-6h) measured at Week 10, AUC (0-168h) steady state measured between Weeks 10 and 11, and AUC (0-tlast) for time interval between Weeks 10 and 12 (approximately336 hours) are presented below. PK evaluable population consisted of all ITT participants who had at least 4 detectable plasma exenatide measurements (not < LLOQ) from Day 1 to Week 12 and had reliable PK data. (NCT00894322)
Timeframe: Week 10-11; Weeks 10 - 12

Interventionpg*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
AUC (0-6h) at Week 10, n=18AUC (0-168h) at Weeks 10-11, n=18AUC (0-tlast) at Weeks 10-12, n=17
Cohort 2 Exenatide 2 mg1535.349100.2101615.0

[back to top]

Antibody Titers for Participants With Treatment Emergent Positive Antibodies to Exenatide in Participants Who Received Exenatide in Cohorts 1 and 2

Serum titers of antibodies to exenatide were evaluated using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Covance Method No. ELISA-0308). Positive antibody to exenatide titer: observed at the indicated visit following a negative or missing titer at baseline, or a positive titer that has increased by at least 3 dilutions at the indicated visit from a detectable baseline. Baseline=Day 1. Negative titers were assigned a value of 1 in order to calculate geometric mean. Geometric mean of reportable titers, by study week, are presented below. (NCT00894322)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 12

,
InterventionReportable Titers (Geometric Mean)
Week 2, N=30, 23; n=4, 1Week 4, N=30, 23; n=14, 10Week 6, N=30, 23; n=0, 15Week 8, N=29, 23; n=22,15Week 10, N=29, 23; n=0,15Last visit, N=30, 23; n=20, 15
Cohort 1 Exenatide 10 mg25.0394.6NA300.7NA202.6
Cohort 2 Exenatide 2 mg25.0202.6295.9561.4453.0625.0

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study in Sitting Heart Rate in Cohorts 1 and 2 in ITT Population

In Cohort 1, sitting heart rates were obtained at Screening (Visit 1), Day 1 (Visit 2), Weeks 1-11 (Visits 3-13), Week 12 (Visit 14), and at early termination. Heart rate was measured in beats per minute (bpm). In Cohort 2, sitting heart rates were obtained at Screening (Visit 1), Day 1 (Visit 2), Weeks 1-10 (Visits 3-12), Week 11 (Visit 15), Week 12 (Visit 16) and at early termination. Baseline was defined as last measurement prior to first injection of study drug. (NCT00894322)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 12

Interventionbpm (Mean)
Cohort 1 Exenatide 10 mg-7.5
Cohort 2 Exenatide 2 mg-5.4
Cohort 2 Placebo-9.1

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline at Week 12 in Fasting Plasma Glucose in Participants With Diabetes (Cohort 2) for the ITT Population

Baseline was the last measurement at the screening visit. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was measured at screening, Day 1, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, or early termination and reported in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). (NCT00894322)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Cohort 2 Exenatide 2 mg-32
Cohort 2 Placebo8

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline at Week 12 in Body Weight in Participants With Diabetes (Cohort 2) in the ITT Population

Body weight was measured in kilograms (kg). Baseline was Day 1, last measurement prior to first dose of study drug. Body weight was measured at screening, Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12 or early termination and the LOCF approach was applied to estimate missing value at each post baseline timepoint. (NCT00894322)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Cohort 2 Exenatide 2 mg-1.41
Cohort 2 Placebo-0.39

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Concomitant Medications in Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 in ITT Population

Concomitant medications are defined as those medications received on or after the date of the first injection on Day 1, including prior medications that continued past Day 1 and new concomitant medications. Participants may be counted in more than one medication class and no more than once in each class. Categories by Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification using the World Health Organization (WHO) Drug Dictionary version C1, 01 March 2009. As per protocol, all participants in Cohort 1 could receive up to 2 anti-emetic medications approximately 30 minutes prior to the exenatide. (NCT00894322)
Timeframe: Day 1 to 12 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Cohort 1 Exenatide 10 mg30
Cohort 2 Exenatide 2 mg21
Cohort 2 Placebo11

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Serum Glucose (FSG) From Baseline to Week 26

Change in FSG from baseline to Week 26. (NCT00917267)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-40.57
Exenatide Twice Daily-23.90

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26.

Change in HbA1c from baseline to Week 26. (NCT00917267)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionpercentage of total hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-1.43
Exenatide Twice Daily-1.12

[back to top]

Change in High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) From Baseline to Week 26

Change in HDL from baseline to Week 26. (NCT00917267)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-0.11
Exenatide Twice Daily-0.48

[back to top]

Change in Total Cholesterol (TC) From Baseline to Week 26

Change in TC from baseline to Week 26. (NCT00917267)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-9.41
Exenatide Twice Daily-8.10

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight (BW) From Baseline to Week 26

Change in BW from baseline to Week 26. (NCT00917267)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-1.63
Exenatide Twice Daily-2.45

[back to top]

Ratio of Triglycerides (TG) at Week 26 to Baseline

Ratio of TG (measured in mg/dL) at Week 26 to baseline. Log(Post-baseline TG) - log(Baseline TG); change from baseline to Week 26 is presented as ratio of Week 26 to baseline. (NCT00917267)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly0.97
Exenatide Twice Daily0.97

[back to top]

Assessment of Event Rate of Treatment-emergent Hypoglycemic Events

Major hypoglycemia: any episode with symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia that resulted in loss of consciousness or seizure with prompt recovery in response to administration of glucagon or glucose OR documented hypoglycemia (blood glucose <3.0 mmol/L [54 mg/dL]) and required the assistance of another person. Minor hypoglycemia: any sign or symptom associated with hypoglycemia that is either self-treated by the patient or resolves on its own AND has a concurrent finger stick blood glucose <3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) and not classified as major hypoglycemia. Event rate per subject year was calculated for each subject: (number of events observed from a subject/exposure from a subject)*365.25 where exposure = last post-baseline visit date - baseline visit date. Mean and Standard Error were then derived from ITT. (NCT00917267)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 26

,,,
Interventionevents per subject-year (Mean)
Major HypoglycemiaMinor Hypoglycemia
Exenatide Once Weekly With SU Use at Screening0.000.24
Exenatide Once Weekly Without SU Use at Screening0.000.03
Exenatide Twice Daily With SU Use at Screening0.010.59
Exenatide Twice Daily Without SU Use at Screening0.000.11

[back to top]

Change in Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 26

Change in systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure from baseline to Week 26. (NCT00917267)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Systolic Blood PressureDiastolic Blood Pressure
Exenatide Once Weekly-5.33-1.47
Exenatide Twice Daily-5.22-2.24

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c Targets <=7% at Week 26

Percentage of patients achieving HbA1c <=7% at Week 26 (for patients with HbA1c >7% at baseline). (NCT00917267)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Exenatide Once Weekly46.7
Exenatide Twice Daily35.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c Targets <=6.5% at Week 26

Percentage of patients achieving HbA1c <=6.5% at Week 26 (for patients with HbA1c >6.5% at baseline). (NCT00917267)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Exenatide Once Weekly26.0
Exenatide Twice Daily15.5

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 26)

Change in Body Weight from baseline to endpoint (Week 26) (NCT00935532)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-1.67
Insulin Glargine0.34

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Serum Glucose (FSG) From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 26)

Change in FSG (centralized measurement) from baseline to endpoint (Week 26) (NCT00935532)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-46.09
Insulin Glargine-40.82

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 26)

Change in HbA1c from baseline to endpoint (Week 26). (NCT00935532)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionpercentage of total hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-1.11
Insulin Glargine-0.68

[back to top]

Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 26)

Change in HDL-C from baseline to endpoint (Week 26) (NCT00935532)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-0.99
Insulin Glargine-0.71

[back to top]

Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 26)

Change in Total Cholesterol from baseline to endpoint (Week 26) (NCT00935532)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-14.21
Insulin Glargine-6.32

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c<=6.5%

Percentage of subjects achieving HbA1c <=6.5% (for subjects with HbA1c >6.5% at baseline) (NCT00935532)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Exenatide Once Weekly20.6
Insulin Glargine4.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c<=7%

Percentage of subjects achieving HbA1c <=7.0% (for subjects with HbA1c >7% at baseline) (NCT00935532)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Exenatide Once Weekly42.2
Insulin Glargine21.0

[back to top]

Ratio of Fasting Triglycerides at Endpoint (Week 26) to Baseline

Ratio of Triglycerides (measured in mg/dL) at endpoint (Week 26) to Baseline. Log(Postbaseline Triglycerides) - log(Baseline Triglycerides); change from baseline to endpoint is presented as ratio of endpoint to baseline. (NCT00935532)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly1.00
Insulin Glargine1.00

[back to top]

Change in Blood Pressure From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 26)

Change in Blood Pressure from baseline to endpoint (Week 26) (NCT00935532)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Systolic Blood PressureDiastolic Blood Pressure
Exenatide Once Weekly-4.5-1.1
Insulin Glargine-2.6-2.5

[back to top]

Assessment on Event Rate of Treatment-emergent Major Hypoglycemic Events

Major confirmed hypoglycemia was defined as (1) any event accompanying symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia that resulted in loss of consciousness or seizure but resolved promptly in response to administration of glucagon or (2) glucose, or documented hypoglycemia (blood glucose <3.0 mmol/L [54 mg/dL]) requiring assistance because of severe impairment in consciousness or motor activity whether or not symptoms of hypoglycemia were felt by the patient. Event rate per subject year was calculated for each subject: (number of events observed from a subject/exposure from a subject)*365.25 where exposure = last postbaseline visit date - baseline visit date. Mean and SE were then derived from FAS. (NCT00935532)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 26

Interventionevents per subject-year (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly0.00
Insulin Glargine0.00

[back to top]

Assessment on Event Rate of Treatment-emergent Minor Hypoglycemic Events

Minor confirmed hypoglycemia was defined as any event a patient felt that he or she was experiencing a sign or symptom associated with hypoglycemia that resolved by self-treatment or on its own, and a concurrent self-monitoring fingerstick blood glucose <3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) and not classified as major hypoglycemia. Event rate per subject year was calculated for each subject: (number of events observed from a subject/exposure from a subject)*365.25 where exposure = last postbaseline visit date - baseline visit date. Mean and SE were then derived from FAS. (NCT00935532)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 26

Interventionevents per subject-year (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly0.01
Insulin Glargine0.16

[back to top]

Mean Change in HbA1c (Per Protocol)

Mean change in HbA1c through Week 48 (NCT00943917)
Timeframe: Day 0 to Week 48

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
ITCA 650 20/20-1.00
ITCA 650 20/60-1.23
ITCA 650 40/40-0.69
ITCA 650 40/80-1.37
Ex Inj/ITCA 650 40-1.45
Ex Inj/ITCA 650 60-1.88

[back to top]

Mean Change in HbA1c (Per Protocol)

Mean change in HbA1c through Week 24 (NCT00943917)
Timeframe: Day 0 to Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
ITCA 650 20/20-.89
ITCA 650 20/60-1.26
ITCA 650 40/40-0.67
ITCA 650 40/80-1.36
Ex Inj/ITCA 650 40-1.01
Ex Inj/ITCA 650 60-1.51

[back to top]

Mean Change in HbA1c (Per Protocol)

Mean change in HbA1c over first 12 weeks (Stage I) (NCT00943917)
Timeframe: Day 0 and Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
ITCA 650 20 mcg/Day - STAGE I-0.96
ITCA 650 40 mcg/Day - STAGE I-1.04
Exenatide Injection - STAGE I-0.82

[back to top]

Mean Change in HbA1c (ITT)

Mean change in HbA1c through Week 48 (NCT00943917)
Timeframe: Day 0 to Week 48

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
ITCA 650 20/20-1.13
ITCA 650 20/60-1.25
ITCA 650 40/40-0.48
ITCA 650 40/80-1.40
Ex Inj/ITCA 650 40-1.16
Ex Inj/ITCA 650 60-1.84

[back to top]

Mean Change in HbA1c (ITT)

Mean change in HbA1c through Week 24 (NCT00943917)
Timeframe: Day 0 to Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
ITCA 650 20/20-0.89
ITCA 650 20/60-1.26
ITCA 650 40/40-0.70
ITCA 650 40/80-1.36
Ex Inj/ITCA 650 40-1.01
Ex Inj/ITCA 650 60-1.51

[back to top]

Mean Change in HbA1c (ITT)

Mean change in HbA1c through Week 12 (NCT00943917)
Timeframe: Day 0 to Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
ITCA 650 20 mcg/Day - STAGE I-.93
ITCA 650 40 mcg/Day - STAGE I-0.96
Exenatide Injection - STAGE I-0.75

[back to top]

Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) From Baseline to Week 30

Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) from baseline to Week 30 using MMRM model.The model included the respective baseline outcome as covariate, treatment, country, prior use of SUs, week of visit, and treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and patient and error as random effects. (NCT00960661)
Timeframe: baseline, Week 30

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide (BET)-0.64
Insulin Lispro (BBT)-0.14

[back to top]

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Week 30

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) from baseline to Week 30 using MMRM model.The model included the respective baseline outcome as covariate, treatment, country, prior use of SUs, week of visit, and treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and patient and error as random effects. (NCT00960661)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 30

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide (BET)-4.13
Insulin Lispro (BBT)0.37

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 30.

Change in body weight from baseline to Week 30 using MMRM model.The model included the respective baseline outcome as covariate, treatment, country, prior use of SUs, week of visit, and treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and patient and error as random effects. (NCT00960661)
Timeframe: baseline, week 30

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide (BET)-2.45
Insulin Lispro (BBT)2.11

[back to top]

Change in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) From Baseline to Week 30

Change in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) from baseline to week 30 using ANCOVA model.The model included the respective secondary outcome as dependent variable, country, prior use of SU's and treatment groups as factors, and the respective outcomes baseline value as a covariate. (NCT00960661)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 30

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide (BET)-0.12
Insulin Lispro (BBT)-0.03

[back to top]

Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 30

Change in total cholesterol from baseline to Week 30 using ANCOVA model. The model included the respective secondary outcome as dependent variable, country, prior use of SU's and treatment groups as factors, and the respective outcomes baseline value as a covariate. (NCT00960661)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 30

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide (BET)-0.14
Insulin Lispro (BBT)-0.03

[back to top]

Major Hypoglycemia Rate Per Year

Mean (standard deviation) of major hyperglycemia episodes experienced per year. Rates per year were calculated for each individual as the number of episodes divided by the total number of days in the study (from randomization to last visit date), then multiplied by 365.25. Major hypoglycemia was defined as any symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia resulting in loss of consciousness or seizure that shows prompt recovery in response to administration of glucagon or glucose OR documented hypoglycemia (blood glucose <3.0 mmol/L [54 mg/dL]) and requiring the assistance of another person because of severe impairment in consciousness or behavior. (NCT00960661)
Timeframe: 30 weeks

Interventionrate per year (Mean)
Exenatide (BET)0.0
Insulin Lispro (BBT)0.1

[back to top]

Minor Hypoglycemia Rate Per Year

Mean (standard deviation) of minor hyperglycemia episodes experienced per year. Rates per year were calculated for each individual as the number of episodes divided by the total number of days in the study (from randomization to last visit date), then multiplied by 365.25. Minor hypoglycemia was defined as any time a participant feels that he or she is experiencing a sign or symptom associated with hypoglycemia that is either self-treated by the participant or resolves on its own AND has a concurrent finger stick blood glucose <3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) (NCT00960661)
Timeframe: 30 weeks

Interventionrate per year (Mean)
Exenatide (BET)2.1
Insulin Lispro (BBT)5.0

[back to top]

Percent of Participants Achieving HbA1c ≤ 6.5%.

Percent of participants achieving HbA1c ≤ 6.5%. (NCT00960661)
Timeframe: Week 30

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Exenatide (BET)26.2
Insulin Lispro (BBT)25.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving HbA1C < 7.0%

Percentage of participants achieving HbA1C < 7.0% (NCT00960661)
Timeframe: Week 30

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Exenatide (BET)46.7
Insulin Lispro (BBT)42.6

[back to top]

Daily Insulin Glargine Dose at Baseline and at Week 30

Daily Insulin Glargine Dose at baseline and at Week 30 (NCT00960661)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 30

,
InterventionIU/day (Mean)
BaselineWeek 30
Exenatide (BET)61.556.9
Insulin Lispro (BBT)61.151.5

[back to top]

Change in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) From Baseline to Week 30

Change in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) from baseline to Week 30 using ANCOVA model.The model included the respective secondary outcome as dependent variable, country, prior use of SU's and treatment groups as factors, and the respective outcomes baseline value as a covariate. (NCT00960661)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 30

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide (BET)-0.04
Insulin Lispro (BBT)0.03

[back to top]

Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) From Baseline to Week 30

Change in HbA1c from baseline following 30 weeks of therapy (i.e. HbA1c at week 30 minus HbA1c at baseline). (NCT00960661)
Timeframe: Baseline, 30 weeks

Interventionpercent of hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide (BET)-1.13
Insulin Lispro (BBT)-1.10

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG) From Baseline to Week 30.

Change in fasting blood glucose (FBG) from Baseline to Week 30 using MMRM model. The model included the respective baseline outcome as covariate, treatment, country, prior use of SUs, week of visit, and treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and patient and error as random effects. (NCT00960661)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 30

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide (BET)-0.46
Insulin Lispro (BBT)0.18

[back to top]

Changes in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 26

Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to Week 26 (NCT01003184)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-7.37
Insulin Detemir-2.65

[back to top]

Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 26).

Change in triglycerides from baseline to endpoint (week 26). (NCT01003184)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-0.01
Insulin Detemir-0.08

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving ≤6.5% at Endpoint

Percentage of patients achieving HbA1c ≤6.5% at endpoint (NCT01003184)
Timeframe: Week 26

InterventionPercentage (Number)
Exenatide Once Weekly27.9
Insulin Detemir7.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Who Have Achieved HbA1c ≤7.4% With Weight Loss (≥1.0 kg) at Endpoint (Week 26)

Percentage of patients who have achieved HbA1c ≤7.4% with weight loss (≥1.0 kg) at endpoint (Week 26) (NCT01003184)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

InterventionPercentage (Number)
Exenatide Once Weekly58.9
Insulin Detemir17.8

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26

Change in body weight from baseline to week 26 (NCT01003184)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionkilograms (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-2.79
Insulin Detemir0.88

[back to top]

Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 26.

Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to week 26. (NCT01003184)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-0.79
Insulin Detemir-0.34

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Serum Glucose From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 26).

Change in fasting serum glucose from baseline to endpoint (Week 26). (NCT01003184)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-2.33
Insulin Detemir-2.43

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26

Change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26 (NCT01003184)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

InterventionPercentage of total hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-1.32
Insulin Detemir-0.91

[back to top]

Change in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 26).

Change in High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol from baseline to endpoint (week 26). (NCT01003184)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly0.02
Insulin Detemir0.04

[back to top]

Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 26).

Change in total cholesterol from baseline to endpoint (week 26). (NCT01003184)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-0.09
Insulin Detemir0.06

[back to top]

Hypoglycemia Rate Per Year

All confirmed hypoglycemia episodes defined as either minor (any time a patient feels that he or she is experiencing a sign or symptom associated with hypoglycaemia and blood glucose (BG) <3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL)) or major (any hypoglycaemic episode with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia, resulting in loss of consciousness or seizure, and shows prompt recovery in response to administration of glucagon or glucose, or BG measurement < 3.0mmol/L is available and the patient is not capable of self-treating were taken into account. (NCT01003184)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionevents per subject-year (Number)
Exenatide Once Weekly0.06
Insulin Detemir0.10

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving ≤7.0% at Endpoint

Percentage of patients achieving ≤7.0% at endpoint. (NCT01003184)
Timeframe: Week 26

InterventionPercentage (Number)
Exenatide Once Weekly51.4
Insulin Detemir34.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Concentration ≤7.0% With Weight Loss (≥1.0 kg) at Endpoint (Week 26)

The primary endpoint is the percentage of patients achieving HbA1c concentration ≤7.0% with weight loss (≥1.0 kg) at endpoint. The last post-baseline measurement set of both non-missing HbA1c concentration and weight (measured at the same time point, i.e. visit) is used as endpoint value. Patients who do not have a baseline weight measurement, have a protocol violation of baseline HbA1c <=7.0%, and/or have missing post-baseline measurements for HbA1c concentration and/or weight, are included in the analysis as non-responders regarding the primary objective. (NCT01003184)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

InterventionPercentage (Number)
Exenatide Once Weekly44.1
Insulin Detemir11.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c ≤7.4% at Endpoint

Percentage of patients who have achieved HbA1c ≤.7.4% at endpoint (NCT01003184)
Timeframe: Week 26

InterventionPercentage (Number)
Exenatide Once Weekly66.7
Insulin Detemir54.3

[back to top]

Change in Anthropometric Variables (BMI).

(NCT01006889)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionKg/m2 (Mean)
Exenatide (Twice Daily)-1.5

[back to top]

Lipid Profiles, Lipoprotein Analysis by NMR (LipoScience).

Change in lipid levels vs. pretreatment. (NCT01006889)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
CholesterolTriglycerideLDL-CHDL-C
Exenatide (Twice Daily)-421-8-1

[back to top]

Insulin Secretion (Hyperglycemic Clamp)

Change in C-peptide levels vs. pretreatment in the first and second phase. (NCT01006889)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Delta first phase insulin secretionDelta second phase insulin secretion
Exenatide (Twice Daily)-0.11.1

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Glucose Infusion (M Value) During Hyperglycemic Clamp

M value represents glucose infusion change (NCT01006889)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage change vs pretreatment (Mean)
Exenatide (Twice Daily)30

[back to top]

Number of Severe Hypoglycemic (Glucose ≤40 mg/dL) Events.

(NCT01006889)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionnumber of events (Number)
Exenatide (Twice Daily)0

[back to top]

Hepatic Steatosis

Hepatic steatosis was assessed non-invasively by MRS. (NCT01006889)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionPercentage of liver fat (Mean)
Exenatide (Twice Daily)4.0

[back to top]

Change in Anthropometric Variables (Weight).

(NCT01006889)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionKg (Mean)
Exenatide (Twice Daily)-4.7

[back to top]

A1c

Patients with controlled T2DM with bedtime insulin alone (n=5) or bedtime insulin and premeal rapid-acting insulin novolog (n=15) had eventide given twice daily for 6 months (if on premeal insulin it was stopped). The goal is to assess if adding SQ exenatide is effective to maintain optimal glycemic control in this population. (NCT01006889)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of A1c (Mean)
Exenatide (Twice Daily)6.8

[back to top]

Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 26

Change in total cholesterol from baseline to the treatment endpoint at Week 26. (NCT01029886)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-0.06
Liraglutide Once Daily-0.15

[back to top]

Change in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 26

Change in HDL-C from baseline to the treatment endpoint at Week 26. (NCT01029886)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly0.02
Liraglutide Once Daily0.02

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26

Change in HbA1c from baseline to the treatment endpoint at Week 26. (NCT01029886)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionpercentage of total hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-1.28
Liraglutide Once Daily-1.48

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26

Change in body weight from baseline to the treatment endpoint at Week 26. (NCT01029886)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-2.68
Liraglutide Once Daily-3.57

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Serum Glucose From Baseline to Week 26

Change in fasting serum glucose from baseline to the treatment endpoint at Week 26. (NCT01029886)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-1.76
Liraglutide Once Daily-2.12

[back to top]

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Week 26

Change in SBP from baseline to the treatment endpoint at Week 26. (NCT01029886)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-2.48
Liraglutide Once Daily-3.45

[back to top]

Assessment of Event Rate of Treatment-emergent Hypoglycemic Events

Major hypoglycemia: any episode with symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia that resulted in loss of consciousness or seizure with prompt recovery in response to administration of glucagon or glucose OR documented hypoglycemia (blood glucose <3.0 mmol/L [54 mg/dL]) and required the assistance of another person. Minor hypoglycemia: any sign or symptom associated with hypoglycemia that is either self-treated by the patient or resolves on its own AND has a concurrent finger stick blood glucose <3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) and not classified as major hypoglycemia. Event rate per subject year was calculated for each subject: (number of events observed from a subject/exposure from a subject)*365.25 where exposure = last post-baseline visit date - baseline visit date. Mean and Standard Error were then derived from ITT. (NCT01029886)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 26

,,,
Interventionevents per subject-year (Mean)
Major HypoglycemiaMinor Hypoglycemia
Exenatide Once Weekly With SU Use at Screening0.000.76
Exenatide Once Weekly Without SU Use at Screening0.000.67
Liraglutide Once Daily With SU Use at Screening0.000.55
Liraglutide Once Daily Without SU Use at Screening0.000.05

[back to top]

Ratio of Fasting Triglycerides at Week 26 to Baseline

Ratio of fasting triglycerides (measured in mmol/L) treatment endpoint at Week 26 to baseline. Log(Postbaseline fasting triglycerides) - log(Baseline fasting triglycerides); change from baseline to the treatment endpoint at Week 26 is presented as ratio of Week 26 to baseline. (NCT01029886)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly0.97
Liraglutide Once Daily0.89

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <7.0% at Week 26

Percentage of patients achieving HbA1c <7.0% at treatment endpoint at Week 26. (NCT01029886)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Exenatide Once Weekly52.7
Liraglutide Once Daily60.2

[back to top]

Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) From Baseline to Week 26

Change in DBP from baseline to the treatment endpoint at Week 26. (NCT01029886)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly-0.49
Liraglutide Once Daily-0.51

[back to top]

Changes in Diastolic Blood Pressure Between Baseline and Month 12

Changes in Diastolic Blood Pressure Between Baseline and Month 12 (NCT01060059)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Exenatide-2.4
Basal Insulin0.2

[back to top]

Changes in Fasting Blood Glucose From Baseline to Month 12

Changes in Fasting Blood Glucose From Baseline to Month 12 (NCT01060059)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Exenatide-26.7
Basal Insulin-51.4

[back to top]

Changes in Fasting HDL Between Baseline and Month 12

Changes in Fasting HDL Between Baseline and Month 12 (NCT01060059)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Exenatide1.3
Basal Insulin0.2

[back to top]

Changes in Fasting Total Cholesterol Between Baseline and Month 12

Changes in Fasting Total Cholesterol Between Baseline and Month 12 (NCT01060059)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Exenatide-6.0
Basal Insulin-7.5

[back to top]

Changes in Fasting Triglycerides Between Baseline and Month 12

Changes in Fasting Triglycerides Between Baseline and Month 12 (NCT01060059)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Exenatide-16.5
Basal Insulin-30.2

[back to top]

Changes in HbA1c From Baseline to Month 12

Changes in HbA1c from Baseline to Month 12 (NCT01060059)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Exenatide-1.1
Basal Insulin-1.4

[back to top]

Changes in Systolic Blood Pressure Between Baseline and Month 12

Changes in Systolic Blood Pressure Between Baseline and Month 12 (NCT01060059)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Exenatide-4.6
Basal Insulin-1.0

[back to top]

Changes in Weight From Baseline to Month 12

Changes in Weight From Baseline to Month 12 (NCT01060059)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12

Interventionkg (Mean)
Exenatide-3.9
Basal Insulin0.2

[back to top]

Factor of 1 Percent (%) Higher Baseline HbA1c Associated With Treatment Choice at Baseline

Factor of 1% higher baseline HbA1c (from most recent HbA1c) was analyzed for association with treatment choice at baseline. A total of 12 factors were evaluated. A multivariate logistic regression model using the full analysis set (FAS) population was performed for each of the factors to determine if exenatide treatment was more likely to be initiated in the presence of the specific factor. HbA1c was measured as a percent of normal (%). (NCT01060059)
Timeframe: baseline

InterventionPercentage of normal (Mean)
Exenatide8.7
Basal Insulin9.2

[back to top]

Factor of Greater Height Associated With Treatment Choice at Baseline

Factor of greater height (1 centimeter higher) was analyzed for association with treatment choice at baseline. A total of 12 factors were evaluated. A multivariate logistic regression model using the full analysis set (FAS) population was performed for each of the factors to determine if exenatide treatment was more likely to be initiated in the presence of the specific factor. Height was measured in centimeters (cm) . (NCT01060059)
Timeframe: baseline

Interventioncm (Mean)
Exenatide165.8
Basal Insulin164.4

[back to top]

Factor of Higher Body Mass Index (BMI) Associated With Treatment Choice at Baseline

Factor of higher body mass index (BMI) (1 kilogram per meter squared (kg/m^2) higher) was analyzed for association with treatment choice at baseline. A total of 12 factors were evaluated. A multivariate logistic regression model using the full analysis set (FAS) population was performed for each of the factors to determine if exenatide treatment was more likely to be initiated in the presence of the specific factor. BMI measured as kg/m^2. (NCT01060059)
Timeframe: baseline

Interventionkg/m^2 (Mean)
Exenatide35.4
Basal Insulin29.4

[back to top]

Factor of Longer Duration of Diabetes Associated With Treatment Choice at Baseline

The Factor of longer duration of diabetes at baseline (diagnosed 1 year longer) was analyzed for association with treatment choice at baseline. A total of 12 factors were evaluated. A multivariate logistic regression model using the full analysis set (FAS) population was performed for each of the factors to determine if exenatide treatment was more likely to be initiated in the presence of the specific factor. Duration of diabetes was measured in years since the date of diabetes diagnosis. (NCT01060059)
Timeframe: baseline

Interventionyears (Mean)
Exenatide9.0
Basal Insulin12.4

[back to top]

Factor of Older Age Associated With Treatment Choice at Baseline

Older age (1 year older) was analyzed for association with treatment choice at baseline. A total of 12 factors were evaluated. A multivariate logistic regression model using the full analysis set (FAS) population was performed for each of the factors to determine if exenatide treatment was more likely to be initiated in the presence of the specific factor. Age was measured in years. (NCT01060059)
Timeframe: baseline

Interventionyears (Mean)
Exenatide59.2
Basal Insulin65.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving a Weight Decrease >=3% Between Baseline and Month 12

Percentage of Patients Achieving a Weight Decrease >=3% between Baseline and Month 12 (NCT01060059)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Exenatide43.0
Basal Insulin17.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving a Weight Decrease >=5% Between Baseline and Month 12

Percentage of Patients Achieving a Weight Decrease >=5% between Baseline and Month 12 (NCT01060059)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Exenatide29.7
Basal Insulin10.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c Concentration <=7.0% at Month 12

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c Concentration <=7.0% at Month 12 (NCT01060059)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Exenatide39.0
Basal Insulin22.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c Concentration <6.5% at Month 12

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c Concentration <6.5% at Month 12 (NCT01060059)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Exenatide13.1
Basal Insulin4.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Who Achieved Glycemic Target of HbA1c ≤ 7.0% With Minimal Weight Gain (≤ 1 Kg) at Month 12.

Percentage of patients who achieved glycemic target of HbA1c ≤ 7.0% with minimal weight gain (≤ 1 Kg) at month 12. (NCT01060059)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Exenatide35.0
Basal Insulin15.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c Reduction From Baseline >= 1.0% at Month 12

Percentage of Patients with HbA1c Reduction from Baseline >= 1.0% at Month 12 (NCT01060059)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Exenatide49.4
Basal Insulin51.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Hypoglycemia Episodes Between Baseline and Month 12

"Percentage of patients with Hypoglycemia Episodes Between Baseline and Month 12.~All episodes consistent with hypoglycemia with or without a confirmatory blood glucose reading were collected." (NCT01060059)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 12

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Exenatide3.6
Basal Insulin8.2

[back to top] [back to top]

Factors of Higher Creatinine, Higher Fasting High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, Higher Fasting Cholesterol, and Higher Fasting Triglycerides Which Were Associated With Treatment Choice at Baseline

Factors of higher creatinine: 1 milligram per deciliter higher (mg/dL) and higher fasting lipids (HDL cholesterol: 1 mg/dL higher; total cholesterol: 1 mg/dL higher; triglycerides: 1 mg/dL higher) were analyzed for association with treatment choice at baseline. A total of 12 factors were evaluated. A multivariate logistic regression model using the full analysis set (FAS) population was performed for each of the factors to determine if exenatide treatment was more likely to be initiated in the presence of the specific factor. Creatinine and fasting lipids were measured in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). (NCT01060059)
Timeframe: baseline

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Creatinine (N=324, 333)HDL (N=335, 326)Total Cholesterol (N=368, 355)Triglycerides (N=364, 360)
Basal Insulin1.046.9182.7173.6
Exenatide0.944.7181.1177.5

[back to top]

Changes in Fasting LDL Between Baseline and Month 12

Changes in Fasting LDL Between Baseline and Month 12 (NCT01060059)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Exenatide-4.6
Basal Insulin-4.5

[back to top]

BMI Change

BMI was collected at baseline and 24 weeks (NCT01061775)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionkg/m^2 (Mean)
Exenatide-0.77

[back to top]

Waist to Height Ratio (WHtR)

Waist circumference was measured at the natural waist level (midway between the lowest rib margin and the iliac crest) at baseline and 24 weeks (NCT01061775)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
Exenatide-2.06

[back to top]

Childhood Eating Behavior Questionnaire (CEBQ)

The Child Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (CEBQ) was designed as parent-report measure comprised of 35 items, each rated on a five-point likert scale that ranges from never to always. We utilized the CEBQ as a self-report measure during this study; it has not been validated for such use. For the purposes of this study, we looked at the Satiety Responsiveness Subscale Scores (5 questions; total scores could range from 5-25 with lower scores denoting a lower level of satiety). The results reported show the change between baseline and week 24 scores. (NCT01061775)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Exenatide14

[back to top]

Calorie Intake Based on 3-day Diet Records

Dietary data were collected via 3-day diet records (Crawford et al. 1994) twice during the study, at baseline and week 24. Three-day diet records were collected on consecutive days including one weekend day. A registered dietitian (RD) instructed subjects on dietary data collection at baseline appointment. Depending on the age and capacity of the subject, the patient, parent or a collaboration of both recorded dietary intake. A RD entered dietary data into Nutritionist Pro software (First DataBank, SanBruno, CA) and the mean difference was analyzed. (NCT01061775)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionkcals (Mean)
Exenatide406.700

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Attaining Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Less Than 7% and Less Than or Equal to 6.5% at 26 Weeks

The percentage of participants achieving HbA1c level less than 7.0% and less than or equal to 6.5% was analyzed with a logistic regression model with baseline, country, and treatment as factors included in the model. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
HbA1c Less Than 7%HbA1c Less Than or Equal to 6.5%
0.75 mg LY218926565.853.2
1.5 mg LY218926578.262.7
Exenatide52.338.0
Placebo42.924.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks on Pancreatic Enzymes

Amylase (total and pancreas-derived) and lipase concentrations were measured. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

,,,
Interventionunits per liter (Median)
Amylase, Total (n=253, 253, 254, 127)Amylase, Pancreas-derived (n=237, 247, 246, 122)Lipase (n=198, 203, 222, 114)
0.75 mg LY21892653.2810.340.00
1.5 mg LY218926512.5014.8110.34
Exenatide5.565.563.94
Placebo-3.33-3.77-9.53

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks on Electrocardiogram Parameters, Fridericia Corrected QT (QTcF) Interval and PR Interval

The QT interval is a measure of the time between the start of the Q wave and the end of the T wave and was calculated from electrocardiogram (ECG) data using Fridericia's formula: QTc = QT/RR^0.33. Corrected QT (QTc) is the QT interval corrected for heart rate and RR, which is the interval between two R waves. PR is the interval between the P wave and the QRS complex. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

,,,
Interventionmilliseconds (msec) (Least Squares Mean)
QTcF Interval (n=253, 260, 250, 120)PR Interval (n=252, 259, 246, 116)
0.75 mg LY21892650.910.93
1.5 mg LY2189265-1.112.35
Exenatide1.211.01
Placebo1.32-1.83

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks on Blood Pressure

Seated systolic blood pressure (SBP) and seated diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

,,,
Interventionmillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Least Squares Mean)
Seated SBP (n=263, 266, 259, 127)Seated DBP (n=263, 266, 259, 127)
0.75 mg LY2189265-0.360.56
1.5 mg LY21892650.110.76
Exenatide0.06-0.11
Placebo3.401.25

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks in Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta-cell Function (HOMA2-%B) and Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Sensitivity (HOMA2-%S)

The homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) quantifies insulin resistance and beta-cell function. HOMA2-B is a computer model that uses fasting plasma insulin and glucose concentrations to estimate steady-state beta cell function (%B) as a percentage of a normal reference population (normal young adults). HOMA2-S is a computer model that uses fasting plasma insulin and glucose concentrations to estimate insulin sensitivity (%S) as percentages of a normal reference population (normal young adults). The normal reference populations were set at 100%. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

,,,
Interventionpercentage of HOMA2 (Least Squares Mean)
HOMA2-%BHOMA2-%S
0.75 mg LY218926523.611.16
1.5 mg LY218926536.14-3.14
Exenatide15.02-1.59
Placebo0.932.56

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks in the EuroQol 5

The European Quality of Life - 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire is a generic, multidimensional, health-related, quality-of-life instrument. It consists of 2 parts: the first part assesses 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) that have 3 possible levels of response (no problem, some problem, or extreme problem). These dimensions are converted into a weighted health-state Index Score. The EQ-5D United Kingdom (UK) score ranges from -0.59 to 1.0, where a score of 1.0 indicates perfect health and negative values are valued as worse than dead. The second part of the questionnaire consists of a visual analog scale (VAS) on which the participants rated their perceived health state on that day from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health). Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and adjusted by treatment, country, and baseline. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
VAS Health State Score (n=270, 267, 264, 119)EQ-5D UK (n=270, 266, 264, 119)
0.75 mg LY21892652.410.01
1.5 mg LY21892654.500.01
Exenatide3.940.00
Placebo0.71-0.00

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Curve (AUC) for LY2189265

Evaluable pharmacokinetic concentrations from the 4-week, 13-week, 26-week, and 52-week timepoints were combined and utilized in a population approach to determine the population mean estimate and standard deviation at steady-state. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: 4 weeks, 13 weeks, 26 weeks, and 52 weeks

Interventionnanogram hours per milliliter (ng*hr/mL) (Mean)
1.5 mg LY218926512383
0.75 mg LY21892656627

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events at 52 Weeks

A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that first occurs or worsens (increases in severity) after baseline regardless of causality or severity. The number of participants with one or more TEAE is summarized cumulatively at 52 weeks, with the exception of the Placebo/1.5 mg LY2189265 and Placebo/0.75 mg LY2189265 treatment groups, which include only TEAEs that occurred during treatment with LY2189265 (26 weeks through 52 weeks). A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline through 52 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1.5 mg LY2189265226
0.75 mg LY2189265220
Exenatide221
Placebo/1.5 mg LY218926547
Placebo/0.75 mg LY218926541

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events at 26 Weeks

A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that first occurs or worsens (increases in severity) after baseline regardless of causality or severity. The number of participants with one or more TEAE is summarized cumulatively at 26 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline through 26 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1.5 mg LY2189265215
0.75 mg LY2189265199
Exenatide198
Placebo104

[back to top]

Number of Participants With LY2189265 Antibodies at 26 Weeks

LY2189265 (Dulaglutide) anti-drug antibodies (ADA) were assessed. The number of participants with initial postbaseline detection of treatment emergent (defined as a 4-fold increase in the ADA titer from baseline) LY2189265 ADA were summarized. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline through 26 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
0.75 mg LY2189265 or 1.5 mg LY21892656
Exenatide12
Placebo2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adjudicated Pancreatitis at 52 Weeks

The number of participants with pancreatitis confirmed by adjudication is summarized cumulatively at 52 weeks, with the exception of the Placebo/1.5 mg LY2189265 and Placebo/0.75 mg LY2189265 treatment groups, which include only participants with confirmed pancreatitis during treatment with LY2189265 (26 weeks through 52 weeks). A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline through 52 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1.5 mg LY21892651
0.75 mg LY21892650
Exenatide0
Placebo/1.5 mg LY21892650
Placebo/0.75 mg LY21892650

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adjudicated Pancreatitis at 26 Weeks

The number of participants with pancreatitis confirmed by adjudication is summarized cumulatively at 26 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline through 26 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1.5 mg LY21892650
0.75 mg LY21892650
Exenatide0
Placebo0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Requiring Rescue Therapy Due to Hyperglycemia at 52 Weeks

"Rescue therapy was defined as any additional therapeutic intervention in participants who developed persistent, severe hyperglycemia despite full compliance with the assigned therapeutic regimen, or initiation of an alternative antihyperglycemic medication following study drug discontinuation. Participants who had no rescue therapy within specified study period were considered as censored observations at the last available contact date up to specified study period. Time to start first new glucose-lowering intervention due to hyperglycemia (rescue therapy) was analyzed between the groups using the semi-parametric proportional hazard regression model with treatment group and country as fixed effects and baseline glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) as a covariate." (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline through 52 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1.5 mg LY218926510
0.75 mg LY218926527
Exenatide31

[back to top]

Number of Participants Requiring Rescue Therapy Due to Hyperglycemia at 26 Weeks

"Rescue therapy was defined as any additional therapeutic intervention in participants who developed persistent, severe hyperglycemia despite full compliance with the assigned therapeutic regimen, or initiation of an alternative antihyperglycemic medication following study drug discontinuation. Participants who had no rescue therapy within specified study period were considered as censored observations at the last available contact date up to specified study period. Time to start first new glucose-lowering intervention due to hyperglycemia (rescue therapy) was analyzed between the groups using the semi-parametric proportional hazard regression model with treatment group and country as fixed effects and baseline glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) as a covariate." (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline through 26 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1.5 mg LY21892654
0.75 mg LY218926514
Exenatide13
Placebo22

[back to top]

Change in Baseline to 52 Weeks on Pulse Rate

Seated pulse rate was measured. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

Interventionbeats per minute (bpm) (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY21892651.68
0.75 mg LY21892651.56
Exenatide1.15

[back to top]

Change in Baseline to 26 Weeks on Pulse Rate

Seated pulse rate was measured. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

Interventionbeats per minute (bpm) (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY21892652.80
0.75 mg LY21892652.80
Exenatide1.18
Placebo0.61

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks on the Impact of Weight on Self-Perception

The Impact of Weight on Self-Perception (IW-SP) questionnaire contains 3 items that assess how often the participants' body weight affects how happy they are with their appearance and how often they feel self-conscious when out in public. Items are scored on a 5-point numeric rating scale where 5 = never and 1 = always. A single total score is calculated by summing the scores for all 3 items. Total score ranges between 3 and 15, where a higher score is indicative of better self-perception. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY21892650.50
0.75 mg LY21892650.47
Exenatide0.64

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks in the EuroQol 5

The European Quality of Life - 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire is a generic, multidimensional, health-related, quality-of-life instrument. It consists of 2 parts: the first part assesses 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) that have 3 possible levels of response (no problem, some problem, or extreme problem). These dimensions are converted into a weighted health-state Index Score. The EQ-5D United Kingdom (UK) score ranges from -0.59 to 1.0, where a score of 1.0 indicates perfect health and negative values are valued as worse than dead. The second part of the questionnaire consists of a visual analog scale (VAS) on which the participants rated their perceived health state on that day from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health). Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and adjusted by treatment, country, and baseline. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
VAS Health State Score (n=270, 267, 264)EQ-5D UK (n=270, 266, 264)
0.75 mg LY21892653.520.01
1.5 mg LY21892655.150.02
Exenatide3.51-0.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks on Body Mass Index (BMI)

Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

Interventionkilograms per meter squared (kg/m^2) (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY2189265-0.37
0.75 mg LY21892650.18
Exenatide-0.28

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks in the Impact of Weight on Activities of Daily Living

"The Impact of Weight on Activities of Daily Living (renamed the Ability to Perform Physical Activities of Daily Living [APPADL]) questionnaire contains 7 items that assess how difficult it is for participants to engage in certain activities considered to be integral to normal daily life, such as walking, standing and climbing stairs. Items are scored on a 5-point numeric rating scale where 5 = not at all difficult and 1 = unable to do. The individual scores from all 7 items are summed and a single total score is calculated and may range between 7 and 35. A higher score indicates better ability to perform activities of daily living. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate." (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY21892650.18
0.75 mg LY2189265-0.18
Exenatide0.35

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks in Hematological and Biochemical Lab Values

(NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

Intervention (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY2189265NA
0.75 mg LY2189265NA
ExenatideNA

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks for Daily Mean Blood Glucose Values From the 8-point Self-monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Profiles

The SMPG data were collected at the following 8 time points: pre-morning meal; 2 hours post-morning meal; pre-midday meal; 2 hours post-midday meal; pre-evening; 2 hours post-evening meal; bedtime; and 3AM or 5 hours after bedtime. Least squares (LS) means of the mean of the 8 time points (daily mean) were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) analysis with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

Interventionmilligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY2189265-43.84
0.75 mg LY2189265-40.62
Exenatide-36.16

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks for Body Weight

Least squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) analysis with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

Interventionkilograms (kg) (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY2189265-1.08
0.75 mg LY21892650.49
Exenatide-0.76

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks Endpoint in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

Least squares (LS) means were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY2189265-1.36
0.75 mg LY2189265-1.07
Exenatide-0.80

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks on the Impact of Weight on Self-Perception

The Impact of Weight on Self-Perception (IW-SP) questionnaire contains 3 items that assess how often the participants' body weight affects how happy they are with their appearance and how often they feel self-conscious when out in public. Items are scored on a 5-point numeric rating scale where 5 = never and 1 = always. A single total score is calculated by summing the scores for all 3 items. Total score ranges between 3 and 15, where a higher score is indicative of better self-perception. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY21892650.56
0.75 mg LY21892650.47
Exenatide0.46
Placebo0.45

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks on Serum Calcitonin

(NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

Interventionpicograms per milliliter (pg/mL) (Mean)
1.5 mg LY21892650.20
0.75 mg LY21892650.22
Exenatide0.05
Placebo0.05

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks on Body Mass Index (BMI)

Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

Interventionkilograms per meter squared (kg/m^2) (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY2189265-0.48
0.75 mg LY21892650.07
Exenatide-0.41
Placebo0.49

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks in the Impact of Weight on Activities of Daily Living

"The Impact of Weight on Activities of Daily Living (renamed the Ability to Perform Physical Activities of Daily Living [APPADL]) questionnaire contains 7 items that assess how difficult it is for participants to engage in certain activities considered to be integral to normal daily life, such as walking, standing and climbing stairs. Items are scored on a 5-point numeric rating scale where 5 = not at all difficult and 1 = unable to do. The individual scores from all 7 items are summed and a single total score is calculated and may range between 7 and 35. A higher score indicates better ability to perform activities of daily living. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate." (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY21892650.18
0.75 mg LY21892650.12
Exenatide0.47
Placebo0.03

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks in the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire Status (DTSQs) Version

The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status version (DTSQs) is used to assess participant treatment satisfaction at each study visit. The questionnaire consists of 8 items, 6 of which (1, and 4 through 8) assess treatment satisfaction. Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert scale. Scores from the 6 treatment satisfaction items are summed to a Total Treatment Satisfaction Score, which ranges from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 36 (very satisfied). The DTSQ change version (DTSQc) was not collected at 26 weeks. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline score as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY21892652.40
0.75 mg LY21892652.56
Exenatide0.85
Placebo0.49

[back to top]

Number of Participants With LY2189265 Antibodies at 52 Weeks and 4 Weeks After Last Dose of Study Drug

LY2189265 (Dulaglutide) anti-drug antibodies (ADA) were assessed. The number of participants with initial postbaseline detection of treatment emergent (defined as a 4-fold increase in the ADA titer from baseline) LY2189265 ADA were summarized. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: 26 weeks through 52 weeks and 53 weeks through 4 weeks after last dose

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
52 weeks4 weeks after last study dose
0.75 mg LY2189265 or 1.5 mg LY218926531
Exenatide20
Placebo/0.75 mg LY2189265 or 1.5 mg LY218926521

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks in N Terminal Pro Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP)

(NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

Interventionpicograms per milliliter (pg/mL) (Median)
1.5 mg LY2189265-6.77
0.75 mg LY2189265-2.96
Exenatide-3.38
Placebo-0.85

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks in Hematological and Biochemical Lab Values

(NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

Intervention (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY2189265NA
0.75 mg LY2189265NA
ExenatideNA
PlaceboNA

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks for Daily Mean Blood Glucose Values From the 8-point Self-monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Profiles

The SMPG data were collected at the following 8 time points: pre-morning meal; 2 hours post-morning meal; pre-midday meal; 2 hours post-midday meal; pre-evening; 2 hours post-evening meal; bedtime; and 3AM or 5 hours after bedtime. Least squares (LS) means of the mean of the 8 time points (daily mean) were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) analysis with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

Interventionmilligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY2189265-46.82
0.75 mg LY2189265-42.09
Exenatide-37.48
Placebo-18.07

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks for Body Weight

Least squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) analysis with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

Interventionkilograms (kg) (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY2189265-1.34
0.75 mg LY21892650.18
Exenatide-1.14
Placebo1.37

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks Endpoint in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

Least squares (LS) means were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
1.5 mg LY2189265-1.51
0.75 mg LY2189265-1.30
Exenatide-0.99
Placebo-0.46

[back to top]

Rate of Self-reported Hypoglycemic Events at 52 Weeks

Hypoglycemic events (HE) were classified as severe (defined as episodes requiring the assistance of another person to actively administer resuscitative actions), documented symptomatic (defined as any time a participant feels that he/she is experiencing symptoms and/or signs associated with hypoglycemia, and has a plasma glucose level of equal to or less than millimoles/liter [mmol/L]), asymptomatic (defined as events not accompanied by typical symptoms of hypoglycemia but with a measured plasma glucose of equal to or less than 3.9 mmol/L), nocturnal (defined as any hypoglycemic event that occurred between bedtime and waking), or probable symptomatic (defined as events during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were not accompanied by a plasma glucose determination). The 1-year adjusted rate of hypoglycemic events is summarized cumulatively at 52 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline through 52 weeks

,,
Interventionevents per participant per year (Mean)
Severe HEDocumented symptomatic HEAsymptomatic HENocturnal HEProbable symptomatic HE
0.75 mg LY21892650.000.140.560.190.21
1.5 mg LY21892650.000.190.170.070.03
Exenatide0.010.760.370.210.02

[back to top]

Rate of Self-reported Hypoglycemic Events at 26 Weeks

Hypoglycemic events (HE) were classified as severe (defined as episodes requiring the assistance of another person to actively administer resuscitative actions), documented symptomatic (defined as any time a participant feels that he/she is experiencing symptoms and/or signs associated with hypoglycemia, and has a plasma glucose level of equal to or less than 3.9 millimoles/liter [mmol/L]), asymptomatic (defined as events not accompanied by typical symptoms of hypoglycemia but with a measured plasma glucose of equal to or less than 3.9 mmol/L), nocturnal (defined as any hypoglycemic event that occurred between bedtime and waking), or probable symptomatic (defined as events during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were not accompanied by a plasma glucose determination). The 1-year adjusted rate of hypoglycemic events is summarized cumulatively at 26 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline through 26 weeks

,,,
Interventionevents per participant per year (Mean)
Severe HEDocumented symptomatic HEAsymptomatic HENocturnal HEProbable symptomatic HE
0.75 mg LY21892650.000.180.690.190.24
1.5 mg LY21892650.000.220.190.060.04
Exenatide0.011.070.380.230.02
Placebo0.000.060.270.270.04

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Attaining Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Less Than 7% and Less Than or Equal to 6.5% at 52 Weeks

The percentage of participants achieving HbA1c level less than 7.0% and less than or equal to 6.5% was analyzed with a logistic regression model with baseline, country, and treatment as factors included in the model. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
HbA1c Less Than 7.0%HbA1c Less Than or Equal to 6.5%
0.75 mg LY218926559.148.3
1.5 mg LY218926570.857.2
Exenatide49.234.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks on Serum Calcitonin

(NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

Interventionpicograms per milliliter (pg/mL) (Mean)
1.5 mg LY21892650.21
0.75 mg LY21892650.05
Exenatide0.10

[back to top]

Number of Self-reported Hypoglycemic Events at 52 Weeks

Hypoglycemic events (HE) were classified as severe (defined as episodes requiring the assistance of another person to actively administer resuscitative actions), documented symptomatic (defined as any time a participant feels that he/she is experiencing symptoms and/or signs associated with hypoglycemia, and has a plasma glucose level of less than or equal to 3.9 millimoles/liter [mmol/L]), asymptomatic (defined as events not accompanied by typical symptoms of hypoglycemia but with a measured plasma glucose of less than or equal to 3.9 mmol/L), nocturnal (defined as any hypoglycemic event that occurred between bedtime and waking), or probable symptomatic (defined as events during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were not accompanied by a plasma glucose determination). The number of self-reported hypoglycemic events is summarized cumulatively at 52 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline through 52 weeks

,,
Interventionevents (Number)
Severe HEDocumented Symptomatic HEAsymptomatic HENocturnal HEProbable Symptomatic HE
0.75 mg LY21892650391572922
1.5 mg LY218926505347208
Exenatide220598574

[back to top]

Number of Self-reported Hypoglycemic Events at 26 Weeks

Hypoglycemic events (HE) were classified as severe (defined as episodes requiring the assistance of another person to actively administer resuscitative actions), documented symptomatic (defined as any time a participant feels that he/she is experiencing symptoms and/or signs associated with hypoglycemia, and has a plasma glucose level of less than or equal to 3.9 millimoles/liter [mmol/L]), asymptomatic (defined as events not accompanied by typical symptoms of hypoglycemia but with a measured plasma glucose of less than or equal to 3.9 mmol/L), nocturnal (defined as any hypoglycemic event that occurred between bedtime and waking), or probable symptomatic (defined as events during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were not accompanied by a plasma glucose determination). The number of self-reported hypoglycemic events is summarized cumulatively at 26 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline through 26 weeks

,,,
Interventionevents (Number)
Severe HEDocumented Symptomatic HEAsymptomatic HENocturnal HEProbable Symptomatic HE
0.75 mg LY2189265025951516
1.5 mg LY21892650312695
Exenatide114651313
Placebo04563

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks in the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire Status (DTSQs) and Change (DTSQc) Versions

The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status (DTSQs) and change (DTSQc) versions are used to assess participant treatment satisfaction at each study visit and relative change in satisfaction from baseline, respectively. Both questionnaires consist of 8 items, 6 of which (1, and 4 through 8) assess treatment satisfaction. Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert scale. The change version has the same 8 items as the status version with a small alteration of the wording of Item 7. Scores from the 6 treatment satisfaction items are summed to a Total Treatment Satisfaction Score, which ranges from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 36 (very satisfied) for the DTSQs and from -18 (much less satisfied) to +18 (much more satisfied) for the DTSQc. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline score as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
DTSQs Treatment Satisfaction (n=270, 268, 266)DTSQc Treatment Satisfaction (n=249, 237, 226)
0.75 mg LY21892652.1115.46
1.5 mg LY21892652.0515.36
Exenatide0.6914.01

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adjudicated Cardiovascular Events at 52 Weeks

Information on cardiovascular (CV) risk factors was collected at baseline. Data on any new CV event was prospectively collected using a CV event electronic case report form. At prespecified visits, participants were asked about any new CV event since the previous inquiry. Deaths and nonfatal cardiovascular adverse events (AEs) were adjudicated by an external committee of physicians with cardiology expertise. Nonfatal cardiovascular AEs to be adjudicated included myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, hospitalization for heart failure, coronary interventions, and cerebrovascular events, including cerebrovascular accident (stroke) and transient ischemic attack. The number of participants with CV events confirmed by adjudication is summarized cumulatively at 52 weeks. Serious and all other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality are summarized in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline through 52 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any CV EventAny Fatal EventAny Non-fatal CV Event
0.75 mg LY2189265202
1.5 mg LY2189265313
Exenatide202

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks on Pancreatic Enzymes

Amylase (total and pancreas-derived) and lipase concentrations were measured. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

,,
Interventionunits per liter (Median)
Amylase, Total (n=255, 263, 261)Amylase, Pancreas-derived (n=236, 253, 246)Lipase (n=201, 205, 221)
0.75 mg LY21892652.787.690.00
1.5 mg LY21892659.2116.675.45
Exenatide2.387.853.57

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks on Electrocardiogram Parameters, Fridericia Corrected QT (QTcF) Interval and PR Interval

The QT interval is a measure of the time between the start of the Q wave and the end of the T wave and was calculated from electrocardiogram (ECG) data using Fridericia's formula: QTc = QT/RR^0.33. Corrected QT (QTc) is the QT interval corrected for heart rate and RR, which is the interval between two R waves. PR is the interval between the P wave and the QRS complex. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

,,
Interventionmilliseconds (msec) (Least Squares Mean)
QTcF Interval (n=239, 243, 226)PR Interval (n=237, 243, 220)
0.75 mg LY21892652.300.69
1.5 mg LY21892651.282.57
Exenatide2.52-0.82

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks on Blood Pressure

Seated systolic blood pressure (SBP) and seated diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

,,
Interventionmillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Seated SBP (n=248, 256, 238)Seated DBP (n=248, 256, 238)
0.75 mg LY21892651.620.76
1.5 mg LY21892650.830.89
Exenatide0.020.02

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks in Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta-cell Function (HOMA2-%B) and Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Sensitivity (HOMA2-%S)

The homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) quantifies insulin resistance and beta-cell function. HOMA2-B is a computer model that uses fasting plasma insulin and glucose concentrations to estimate steady-state beta cell function (%B) as a percentage of a normal reference population (normal young adults). HOMA2-S is a computer model that uses fasting plasma insulin and glucose concentrations to estimate insulin sensitivity (%S) as percentages of a normal reference population (normal young adults). The normal reference populations were set at 100%. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01064687)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

,,
Interventionpercentage of HOMA2 (Least Squares Mean)
HOMA2-%BHOMA2-%S
0.75 mg LY218926525.69-5.49
1.5 mg LY218926535.21-7.48
Exenatide13.57-3.75

[back to top]

"Incidence Rates Per 100,000 Person-Years of Likely Acute Pancreatitis (Among Recent Use Period) - Time on Drug Analysis"

"Crude time-on-drug incidence rate per 100,000 person-years of likely acute pancreatitis in initiators of exenatide, initiators of other antidiabetic drugs and the non-diabetes cohort. Analysis period is the recent use period, described as time following current use plus an additional 31 days excluding subsequent current use." (NCT01077323)
Timeframe: 43 months

InterventionCases per 100,000 person-years (Number)
Exenatide Initiators321.4
Other Antidiabetic Drug (OADs) Initiators325.5
Non-Diabetes Cohort56.2

[back to top]

"Incidence Rates Per 100,000 Person-Years of Likely Acute Pancreatitis (During Current Use Period) - Time on Drug Analysis"

"Crude time-on-drug incidence rate per 100,000 person-years of likely acute pancreatitis in initiators of exenatide, initiators of other antidiabetic drugs and the non-diabetes cohort. Analysis period is current use period, described as time during current day's supply plus 31 days." (NCT01077323)
Timeframe: 43 months

InterventionCases per 100,000 person-years (Number)
Exenatide Initiators219.7
Other Antidiabetic Drug (OADs) Initiators226.7
Non-Diabetes Cohort56.2

[back to top]

"Incidence Rates Per 100,000 Person-Years of Likely Acute Pancreatitis (During Past Use Period) - Time on Drug Analysis"

"Crude time-on-drug incidence rate per 100,000 person-years of likely acute pancreatitis in initiators of exenatide, initiators of other antidiabetic drugs and the non-diabetes cohort. Analysis period is past use period, described as time following recent use excluding subsequent current or recent use." (NCT01077323)
Timeframe: 43 months

InterventionCases per 100,000 person-years (Number)
Exenatide Initiators354.5
Other Antidiabetic Drug (OADs) Initiators218.1
Non-Diabetes Cohort56.2

[back to top]

Incidence Rates Per 100,000 Person-Years of Likely Acute Pancreatitis Among Initiators of Exenatide, Diabetics Initiating Other Antidiabetic Drugs, and the Non-diabetes Cohort - Intent to Treat Analysis

Crude intent-to-treat incidence rate per 100,000 person-years of likely acute pancreatitis in initiators of exenatide, initiators of other antidiabetic drugs and the non-diabetes cohort. (NCT01077323)
Timeframe: 43 months

InterventionCases per 100,000 person-years (Number)
Exenatide Initiators272.7
Other Antidiabetic Drug (OADs) Initiators227.6
Non-Diabetes Cohort56.2

[back to top]

HbA1c Change

"Measure the changes in HbA1C attributable to exenatide, insulin glargine and their combination.~Employ CGM with AGP analysis to determine if there is an incremental benefit for subjects who do not reach target to add exenatide to insulin glargine or insulin glargine to exenatide in patients taking metformin." (NCT01089569)
Timeframe: baseline to final visit (32 weeks)

,,
Intervention%HbA1c (Mean)
BaselineFinal - Week 32
Exenatide6.47.8
Exenatide + Insulin Glargine6.27.6
Insulin Glargine6.47.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Weight Changes

"Measure the changes in weight attributable to exenatide, insulin glargine and their combinations.~Employ CGM with AGP analysis to determine if there is an incremental benefit for subjects who do not reach target to add exenatide to insulin glargine or insulin glargine to exenatide in patients taking metformin.~Change from baseline was calculated as weight in pounds at baseline minus weight in pounds at final visit (32 weeks)." (NCT01089569)
Timeframe: baseline - final visit (32 weeks)

Interventionlbs (pounds) (Mean)
Exenatide-13.5
Insulin Glargine-0.5
Exenatide + Insulin Glargine-10.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Incidence of Hypoglycemia (Frequency)

"Employ Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) with Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) analysis to characterize the diurnal patterns produced by oral medications (metformin) used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.~Employ CGM to measure the effect of exenatide, insulin glargine and exenatide plus insulin glargine in terms of underlying physiological defects and alter medications in a manner that improves- iv. Incidence of hypoglycemia (frequency)~Change from baseline was calculated as mean incidence rate at baseline minus mean incidence rate at final visit (32 weeks)" (NCT01089569)
Timeframe: baseline to final visit (32 weeks)

Interventionepisodes/day (Mean)
Exenatide.7
Insulin Glargine.8
Exenatide + Insulin Glargine.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Incidence of Hypoglycemia (Degree)

"Employ Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) with Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) analysis to characterize the diurnal patterns produced by oral medications (metformin) used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.~Employ CGM to measure the effect of exenatide, insulin glargine and exenatide plus insulin glargine in terms of underlying physiological defects and alter medications in a manner that improves- iv. Incidence of hypoglycemia (degree) Change from baseline was calculated as mean incidence percentage at baseline minus mean incidence percentage at final visit (32 weeks)" (NCT01089569)
Timeframe: baseline to final visit (32 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of measures under 70 mg/dL (Mean)
Exenatide1.7
Insulin Glargine1.7
Exenatide + Insulin Glargine1.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glucose Stability (Absolute Hourly Rate of Change in Median Curve)

"Employ Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) with Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) analysis to characterize the diurnal patterns produced by oral medications (metformin) used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.~Employ CGM to measure the effect of exenatide, insulin glargine and exenatide plus insulin glargine in terms of underlying physiological defects and alter medications in a manner that improves iii. Glucose stability (absolute hourly rate of change in median curve)~Change from baseline was calculated as mean absolute hourly rate of change in median curve at baseline minus rate at final visit (32 weeks). Mean absolute hourly rate of change in the smoothed median curve is calculated as delta subscript MC = ( (NCT01089569)
Timeframe: p subscript 50 zero - p subscript 50 23

Interventionp subscript 50 zero - p subscript 50 23 (+Sum superscript 23 subscript i = 1)
Exenatide p subscript 50i - p subscript 50 i-1
Insulin Glargine p subscript 50i - p subscript 50 i-1
Exenatide + Insulin Glargine p subscript 50i - p subscript 50 i-1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glucose Exposure (Area Under the Diurnal Median Curve or AUC)

"Employ Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) with Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) analysis to characterize the diurnal patterns produced by oral medications (metformin) used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.~Employ CGM to measure the effect of exenatide, insulin glargine and exenatide plus insulin glargine in terms of underlying physiological defects and alter medications in a manner that improves- i. Glucose exposure (area under the diurnal median curve) Change from baseline was calculated as area under the diurnal median curve at baseline minus AUC value at final visit (32 weeks).~AUC is calculated using modified rectangle method AUC = sum of superscript 23, subscript i=0 P subscript 50i I = hour of day P subscript 50i = smoother 50th percentile value for ith hour of day" (NCT01089569)
Timeframe: baseline - final visit (32 weeks)

Interventionmg/dL*24hr (Mean)
Exenatide-1207.1
Insulin Glargine-1476.2
Exenatide + Insulin Glargine-1315

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in CGM Glucose Variability

"Employ Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) with Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) analysis to characterize the diurnal patterns produced by oral medications (metformin) used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.~Employ CGM to measure the effect of exenatide, insulin glargine and exenatide plus insulin glargine in terms of underlying physiological defects and alter medications in a manner that improves- ii. Glucose variability (inter-quartile range)~IQR is the difference between the 75th and 25th percentiles. Change from baseline was calculated as IQR at baseline minus IQR value at final visit (32 weeks)." (NCT01089569)
Timeframe: baseline to final visit (32 weeks)

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Exenatide-9
Insulin Glargine-7.7
Exenatide + Insulin Glargine-12.1

[back to top]

Participants Negative or Positive for Anti-exenatide Antibodies - ITT Population

Serum titers of antibodies to exenatide were evaluated using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Covance Method No. ELISA-0308). Positive antibody to exenatide titer: observed at the indicated visit following a negative or missing titer at baseline, or a positive titer that has increased by at least 3 dilutions at the indicated visit from a detectable baseline. Baseline=Day 1. (NCT01104701)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Study Termination (24 weeks) or early termination

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Week 2 Negative (n=30,30,30,30)Week 2 Low Titer (<625)(n=30,30,30,30)Week 2 High Titer (≥625)(n=30,30,30,30)Week 20 Negative (n=30,26,29,28)Week 20 Low Titer (<625)(n=30,26,29,28)Week 20 High Titer (≥625)(n=30,26,29,28)
11 mg Exenatide Monthly29109154
2 mg Exenatide Weekly27307158
5 mg Exenatide Monthly30008108
8 mg Exenatide Monthly30009155

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), and AEs Leading to Discontinuation - ITT Population

AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. All participants who received at least one dose of study drug were included in the ITT analysis. Treatment-emergent (TE) adverse events were defined as those with onset at or after initiation of study medication on Day 1 through study termination or early termination. (NCT01104701)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Study Termination (24 Weeks) or early Termination

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment-Emergent AESTreatment-Emergent SAEsTreatment-Emergent AEs Leading to Discontinuation
11 mg Exenatide Monthly2401
2 mg Exenatide Weekly2700
5 mg Exenatide Monthly2520
8 mg Exenatide Monthly2000

[back to top]

Number of Chemistry Laboratory Values of Potential Clinical Importance Observed During Treatment Period - ITT Population

Potential clinical importance (PCI): triacylglycerol lipase high values were > 3* upper limit of normal (ULN); creatinine high values in males >1.6 mg/dL, females >1.4 mg/dL; gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) high value >3* ULN; bilirubin high value > 2 mg/dL; Urate high values > 10 (males), >8 (females) mg/dL; potassium low value < 3 milliequivalents per liter (mEq/L), high value >5.5 mEq/L; calcium low value < 8 mg/dL and high value > 11 mg/dL. Laboratory samples were obtained at baseline (Day 1 or if unavailable, last measurement prior to first study drug dose), Weeks 6, 12, 20, and at study termination (Week 24) or early termination. Number of laboratory values of potential clinical importance (values could be either low or high) are presented for Weeks 6 - Week 24 or early termination. Note: those tests with no values meeting the PCI criteria, ie, 0 values observed across all treatment arms, are not presented. (NCT01104701)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Study Termination (Week24) or early termination

,,,
Interventionlaboratory values (Number)
triacylglycerol lipase Week 12 (n=30,29,29,28)triacylglycerol lipase Week 20 (n=30,27,29,28)Creatinine Week 6 (n=30,30,30,30)Creatinine Week 12 (n=30,29,30,28)Creatinine Week 20 (n=30,26,28,28)Creatinine at study termination (n=30,26,29,28)GGT Week 6 (n=30,30,30,30)GGT Week 20 (n=30,26,28,28)GGT study termination (n=30,26,29,28)Bilirubin Week 6 (n=30,30,30,30)Bilirubin Week 12 (n=30,29,30,28)Urate Week 6 (n=30,30,30,30)Urate Week 12 (n=30,29,30,28)Urate Week 20 (n=30,26,28,28)Urate Study termination (n=30,26,29,28)Potassium Week 6 (n=30,30,30,30)Calcium Week 6 (n=30,30,30,30)
11 mg Exenatide Monthly01000000000222000
2 mg Exenatide Weekly11010021100100111
5 mg Exenatide Monthly10101000011131000
8 mg Exenatide Monthly00000101100212000

[back to top]

Number of Hematology Laboratory Values of Potential Clinical Importance Observed During Treatment Period - ITT Population

Potential clinical importance are the following: Hematocrit values for males less than (<) 36%, females < 30%; hemoglobin for males <12 grams per deciliter (g/dL), females < 10 g/dL; low platelet values <75,000/micro liter (µL), high values greater than (>) 500,000 µL. Laboratory samples were obtained at baseline (Day 1 or if unavailable, last measurement prior to first study drug dose), Weeks 6, 12, 20, and at study termination (Week 24) or early termination. Number of laboratory values of potential clinical importance presented for Weeks 6 - Week 24 or early termination. (NCT01104701)
Timeframe: Day 1 to study termination (24 weeks) or early termination

,,,
Interventionlaboratory values (Number)
Week 6 Hematocrit (n=30,30,30,30)Hematocrit at study termination (n=30,27,29,28)Week 12 Platelets (n=30, 29, 30, 28)
11 mg Exenatide Monthly000
2 mg Exenatide Weekly000
5 mg Exenatide Monthly111
8 mg Exenatide Monthly000

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving HbA1c Target Values at Week 20 - Evaluable Population

HbA1c was measured as a percent (%) of total hemoglobin. The Target values for HbA1c were <7% and ≤ 6.5% at Week 20. Evaluable population was defined as participants who completed study procedures in compliance with the protocol and had adequate exposure to the study drug. (NCT01104701)
Timeframe: Week 20

,,,
Interventionpercentage of Participants (Number)
< 7.0% HbA1c≤ 6.5% HbA1c
11 mg Exenatide Monthly70.448.1
2 mg Exenatide Weekly48.344.8
5 mg Exenatide Monthly50.026.9
8 mg Exenatide Monthly57.139.3

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Week 20 - Intent to Treat (ITT) Population

Baseline was Day 1, or last measurement prior to first dose of study drug. Heart rate was measured after the participant had rested for approximately 5 minutes and with the participant in a sitting position. Measurement was recorded in beats per minute (bpm). The measurement was repeated after at least 30 seconds and the average of the two readings recorded. ITT population was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug. (NCT01104701)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 20

Interventionbpm (Mean)
2 mg Exenatide Weekly2.8
5 mg Exenatide Monthly3.9
8 mg Exenatide Monthly5.6
11 mg Exenatide Monthly-0.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Injection Site Reaction Treatment Emergent Adverse Events - ITT Population

"AE is any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. Injection site related adverse events were defined as the adverse events with 'injection site' phrase in preferred term excluding 'injection site nodule'. The following events were Injection Site Reaction AEs: erythema, hematoma, hemorrhage, site pain, site papule, site pruritus, site warmth.~Participants receiving study drug monthly received 5 injections with last injection at Week 16; Participants receiving study drug weekly received 20 injections with last injection at Week 19.~." (NCT01104701)
Timeframe: Day 1 through study termination (Week 24) or early termination.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
2 mg Exenatide Weekly6
5 mg Exenatide Monthly8
8 mg Exenatide Monthly3
11 mg Exenatide Monthly6

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Diastolic and Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 20 - Intent to Treat (ITT) Population

Baseline was Day 1, or last measurement prior to first dose of study drug. Vital signs were measured after the participant had rested for approximately 5 minutes and with the participant in a sitting position. Measurement was recorded in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). The blood pressure measurement was repeated after at least 30 seconds and the average of the two readings recorded. ITT population was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug. (NCT01104701)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 20

,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Diastolic Blood PressureSystolic Blood Pressure
11 mg Exenatide Monthly1.95.0
2 mg Exenatide Weekly-1.7-2.3
5 mg Exenatide Monthly3.44.4
8 mg Exenatide Monthly1.80.5

[back to top]

Mean Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 20 - Evaluable Population

Body weight was measured in kilograms (kg) at Baseline, and during treatment at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 9-11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17-19, and 20. Baseline was Day 1, or last measurement prior to first dose of study drug. Evaluable population was defined as all participants who completed study procedures in compliance with the protocol and had adequate exposure to the study drug. (NCT01104701)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 20

,,,
Interventionkg (Mean)
Change from baseline to Week 2 (n=29,26,28,27)Change from baseline to Week 4 (n=29,26,28,27)Change from baseline to Week 6 (n=29,26,28,27)Change from baseline to Week 8 (n=28,26,28,27)Change from baseline to Weeks 9-11 (n=29,26,28,27)Change from baseline to Week 12 (n=28,26,28,27)Change from baseline to Week 13 (n=29,26,28,27)Change from baseline to Week 14 (n=29,26,28,27)Change from baseline to Week 15 (n=29,26,28,26)Change from baseline to Week 16 (n=29,26,28,27)Change from baseline to Weeks 17-19(n=29,26,28,27)Change from baseline to Week 20 (n=29,26,28,27)
11 mg Exenatide Monthly0.350.03-0.74-0.70-0.83-0.76-0.97-0.81-1.24-1.02-1.72-1.14
2 mg Exenatide Weekly-0.31-0.66-1.26-1.36-1.73-1.49-1.96-1.91-1.84-1.85-1.63-1.36
5 mg Exenatide Monthly0.32-0.04-0.74-0.85-0.57-0.91-1.20-0.96-1.34-1.33-1.17-1.10
8 mg Exenatide Monthly0.310.32-0.45-0.33-0.49-0.33-0.56-0.76-0.80-0.26-0.58-0.41

[back to top]

Mean Change in Fasting Glucose From Baseline to Week 20 - Evaluable Population

Fasting glucose was measured in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) at screening, Baseline, and during treatment at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 9-11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17-19, and 20. Baseline was Day 1, or last measurement prior to first dose of study drug. Evaluable population was defined as all participants who completed study procedures in compliance with the protocol and had adequate exposure to the study drug. (NCT01104701)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 20

,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Change from baseline to Week 2 (n=29, 26, 28,27)Change from baseline to Week 4 (n=29, 25, 28,27)Change from baseline to Week 6 (n=28, 26, 28,27)Change from baseline to Week 8 (n=28, 26, 28,27)Change from baseline to Weeks 9-11 (n=29,26,27,27)Change from baseline to Weeks 12 (n=29,26,27,27)Change from baseline to Weeks 13 (n=29,26,28,27)Change from baseline to Weeks 14 (n=29,26,28,27)Change from baseline to Weeks 15 (n=29,26,28,26)Change from baseline to Weeks 16 (n=29,26,28,27)Change from baseline to Weeks17-19 (n=29,26,28,27)Change from baseline to Week 20 (n=29,26,28,27)
11 mg Exenatide Monthly-23.5-23.1-48.8-44.0-48.1-44.9-45.7-51.6-53.1-46.3-55.1-48.9
2 mg Exenatide Weekly-1.16-21.7-32.8-40.8-32.8-44.8-42.0-36.3-38.0-34.5-33.3-34.2
5 mg Exenatide Monthly-12.9-18.0-42.6-45.7-40.2-37.4-38.0-37.3-37.3-31.6-42.4-25.1
8 mg Exenatide Monthly-14.6-14.2-39.5-36.8-44.3-45.4-48.6-47.5-46.9-43.3-34.6-29.8

[back to top]

Mean Change in HbA1c From Baseline to End of Treatment (Week 20) - Evaluable Population

HbA1c was measured as a percent of total hemoglobin at screening, Baseline, and during treatment on Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20. Baseline was Day 1, or last measurement prior to first dose of study drug. The Evaluable population was defined as participants who completed study procedures in compliance with the protocol and had adequate exposure to the study drug. (NCT01104701)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to 20 weeks

,,,
InterventionPercent of Hemoglobin (Mean)
Change from baseline at Week 4 (n=29, 26, 28, 27)Change from baseline at Week 8 (n=25, 22, 25, 27)Change from baseline at Week 12 (n=29, 26, 28, 27)Change from baseline at Week 16 (n=29, 26, 28, 27)Change from baseline at Week 20 (n=29, 26, 28, 27)
11 mg Exenatide Monthly-0.34-0.91-1.26-1.43-1.45
2 mg Exenatide Weekly-0.52-1.15-1.43-1.58-1.54
5 mg Exenatide Monthly-0.33-0.89-1.30-1.40-1.29
8 mg Exenatide Monthly-0.24-1.03-1.19-1.41-1.31

[back to top]

Time Weighted Average Concentration and Peak to Trough of Exenatide From Week 12 Through Week 16 - Pharmacokinetic Evaluable - Steady State Population

All participants received an initial blood draw prior to the first dose and a single blood sample was collected at all other subsequent visits, for plasma exenatide assessments and the characterization of pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters following multiple monthly doses over the study period. Exenatide was measured using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Time weighted average concentration (Cave (2016-2688 h) and Peak to Trough were measured in picograms per milliliter (pg/mL). (NCT01104701)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 20

,,,
Interventionpg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cave(2016-2688h) pg/mLPeak-Trough (2016-2688h) pg/mL
11 mg Exenatide Monthly218.07328.52
2 mg Exenatide Weekly262.92171.27
5 mg Exenatide Monthly127.13198.06
8 mg Exenatide Monthly247.38424.47

[back to top]

Severity of Obstructive Sleep Apnea

The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) will be calculated from polysomnographic recordings. The minimum score for AHI is 0 (zero), corresponding to total absence of apnea or hypopnea. There is no theoretical maximum score although scores above 100 are very rarely observed. The lower the AHI value, the better. Higher AHI values correspond to greater severity of sleep apnea, a worse outcome. There are no subscales. We use continuous AHI values to measure severity of obstructive sleep apnea. (NCT01136798)
Timeframe: baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineAt 6 week
Usual T2 DM Med Regimen15.916.5
Usual T2 DM Med Regimen Plus Exenatide16.410.9

[back to top]

Sleep Efficiency During Polysomnographic Recording

Sleep efficiency will be calculated as total sleep time over total recording time. (NCT01136798)
Timeframe: baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment

,
Interventionpercentage of total recording time (Mean)
BaselineAt 6 week
Usual T2 DM Med Regimen84.383.8
Usual T2 DM Med Regimen Plus Exenatide85.389.4

[back to top]

Mean 24-h Blood Glucose Levels

Mean plasma levels of glucose will be calculated from samples collected across the 24-h cycle. (NCT01136798)
Timeframe: baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment

,
Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
BaselineAt 6 week
Usual T2 DM Med Regimen134.4141.3
Usual T2 DM Med Regimen Plus Exenatide142.2136.1

[back to top]

Minutes of Wake After Sleep Onset During Sleep Recording

total amount of time spent awake after sleep onset and before morning awakening will be calculated (NCT01136798)
Timeframe: baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment

,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
BaselineAt 6 week
Usual T2 DM Med Regimen70.452.3
Usual T2 DM Med Regimen Plus Exenatide56.636.6

[back to top]

Non-REM Slow Wave Sleep

Total minutes of non-REM sleep was measured (NCT01136798)
Timeframe: baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment

,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
BaselineAt 6 week
Usual T2 DM Med Regimen47.357.3
Usual T2 DM Med Regimen Plus Exenatide34.341.4

[back to top]

the Comparison Between Treatment Groups of the Changes From Baseline in HbA1c at 48 Weeks

(NCT01147627)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

Interventionpercentage of HbA1c (Mean)
Exenatide-1.8
Premixed Insulin Analog-1.74
Thiazolidinedione-1.47

[back to top]

HbA1c

To compare the HbA1c at the end of 12 weeks in patients on exenatide subcutaneously twice daily (5 or 10 mcg/injection) as compared to controls in insulin treated obese type 2 diabetic patients. (NCT01154933)
Timeframe: value at 12 weeks minus value at baseline

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Exenatide 10 mcg-1.2
Placebo-0.5

[back to top]

Fasting Insulin

To compare the fasting insulin level at the end of 12 weeks in patients on exenatide subcutaneously twice daily (5 or 10 mcg/injection) as compared to controls in insulin treated obese type 2 diabetic patients. (NCT01154933)
Timeframe: after 24 hours fast at baseline and 12 weeks

,
InterventionμU/mL (Mean)
At BaselineAt 12 weeks
Exenatide 10 mcg12.716.4
Placebo13.113.9

[back to top]

Weight

To compare the body weight at the end of 12 weeks in patients on exenatide subcutaneously twice daily (5 or 10 mcg/injection) as compared to controls in insulin treated obese type 2 diabetic patients (NCT01154933)
Timeframe: value at 12 weeks minus value at baseline

Interventionlbs (Mean)
Exenatide 10 mcg0
Placebo3

[back to top]

Intranuclear NFκB Binding Activity

Measured by a gel shift assay showing the NFKB and Oct-1 binding to the doublestranded oligonucleotide containing the NFKB DNA binding site in Exenatide group and placebo group (NCT01154933)
Timeframe: measured after 6 hours of a single dose of placebo or exenatide treatment for value measured at 12 weeks minus baseline

Intervention% ratio of NFKB/Oct-1 (Mean)
Exenatide 10 mcg26
Placebo0

[back to top]

Reactive Hyperemia Index (RHI)

Greater RHI reflects greater endothelial function. It is calculated as average post-ischemia pulse magnitude divided by average pre-ischemia pulse magnitude. Results are expressed as least-square means of ANCOVA models. (NCT01181986)
Timeframe: 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours on Day 11 (Sub-study 1); 0 and 120 minutes on test Days 1, 2 & 3 (Sub-study 2)

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide (Subs-study 1)1.90
Placebo (Sub-study 1)1.79
Saline+Exenatide (Sub-study 2)2.24
Saline+Placebo (Sub-study 2)1.95
Exendin-9+Exenatide (Sub-study 2)1.99

[back to top]

Plasma Triglycerides

Triglycerides concentrations were measured before and 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours following study drug. Results are expressed as least-square means of ANCOVA models adjusted for sampling time and intervention sequence. (NCT01181986)
Timeframe: 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours post-study drug on day 11

Interventionmg/dl (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide (Sub-study 1)175
Placebo (Sub-study 1)230

[back to top]

Plasma Glucose

Plasma glucose was measured before and 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours following study drug administration. Results are expressed as least-square means of ANCOVA models adjusted for sampling time and intervention sequence. (NCT01181986)
Timeframe: 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-study drug on day 11

Interventionmg/dl (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide (Sub-study 1)115
Placebo (Sub-study 1)136

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index at 3-months

As results are measured by BMI reduction, percent change (reduction) in BMI is primary outcome measure. (NCT01237197)
Timeframe: Baseline and 3-months

Interventionpercentage of change in BMI (Mean)
Exenatide-2.9
Placebo Injection-0.15

[back to top]

Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)

Scale range: 0 - 30 points (higher is better) (NCT01255163)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Exendin-423.11
Placebo23.11

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Incidence of Nausea

Tolerability of exenatide (nausea is the most common expected adverse event of exenatide) (NCT01255163)
Timeframe: 18 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Exendin-45
Placebo0

[back to top]

Cerebrospinal Fluid Amyloid-beta 42 (CSF Abeta42)

Abeta42 peptide measured in CSF using Luminex xMAP technology and INNO-BIA Alz Bio3 kits (Research Use Only) provided by Fujirebio (NCT01255163)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionpg/dl (Mean)
Exendin-4177.43
Placebo176.38

[back to top]

Body Mass Index (BMI)

Body Mass Index defined as a person's weight in kilograms (kg) divided by his or her height in meters squared. (NCT01255163)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionkg/m^2 (Mean)
Exendin-425.867
Placebo25.789

[back to top]

Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Total Tau

Total Tau measured in CSF using Luminex xMAP technology and INNO-BIA Alz Bio3 kits (Research Use Only) provided by Fujirebio (NCT01255163)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionpg/dl (Mean)
Exendin-486.57
Placebo70.75

[back to top]

Cerebrospinal Fluid phospho181-tau (CSF p181-tau)

p-181-Tau measured in CSF using Luminex xMAP technology and INNO-BIA Alz Bio3 kits (Research Use Only) provided by Fujirebio (NCT01255163)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionpg/dl (Mean)
Exendin-454.57
Placebo44.25

[back to top]

Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Global Score

Clinical Dementia Rating global score range: 0 (no dementia); 0.5 (Mild Cognitive Impairment); 1 (mild dementia); 2 (moderate dementia); 3 (severe dementia). Higher is worse. (NCT01255163)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Exendin-40.889
Placebo0.833

[back to top]

Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog70)

Alzheimer's dementia scale cognitive sub-scale range: 0 - 70 points (higher is worse) (NCT01255163)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Exendin-416
Placebo17.78

[back to top]

Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Sum of Boxes

"Sum of the Clinical Dementia Rating boxes (memory, orientation, judgment and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies, personal care). Each box is rated as 0, 0.5, 1, 2 or 3. Range for the sum of boxes is 0 - 18. Higher scores reflect a greater severity of dementia." (NCT01255163)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Exendin-44.778
Placebo4.5

[back to top]

Post-prandial Blood Glucose Concentration in Both Pramlintide and Exenatide Treated Groups in Acute and Chronic Setting, Compared to Insulin Monotherapy in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.

We measured post-prandial blood sugars in both pramlintide and exenatide treated groups in acute and chronic setting, when compared to insulin monotherapy in subjects with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (NCT01269047)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Acute Pramlintide + Insulin Group9.03
Acute Exenatide + Insulin Group8.4
Chronic Pramlintide + Insulin Group8.0
Chronic Exenatide + Insulin Group10.2
Insulin Monotherapy10.8

[back to top]

Difference in HbA1C Between the Treatment and the Control Groups

(NCT01269047)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of HbA1C values (Mean)
Acute Pramlintide + Insulin Group0.30
Acute Exenatide + Insulin Group0.60
Chronic Pramlintide + Insulin Group0.23
Chronic Exenatide + Insulin Group0.40
Insulin Monotherapy-0.40

[back to top]

Assay Sensitivity of Moxifloxacin at 1200h (3 Hour Post-administration of Moxifloxacin) on Day 2

Change from baseline in QTcP was analyzed by a MMRM between moxifloxacin and placebo. (NCT01297062)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 2

Interventionmsec (Least Squares Mean)
Moxifloxacin12.47
Placebo1.56

[back to top]

Plasma Exenatide Concentrations at Steady State on Day 1, 2 and 3

The plasma exenatide concentration at steady state was descriptively summarized by geometric mean, standard error, and its effect on placebo-adjusted change from baseline in QTcP was assessed. (NCT01297062)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, 2, and 3

Interventionpg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 2Day 3
Exenatide252.74399.14626.65

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With QTcP Interval >450msec at Any Timepoint on Any Day in Exenatide and Placebo

Number of subjects with QTcP > 450 msec at any timepoint on any day was summarized by frequency for exenatide and placebo. (NCT01297062)
Timeframe: Day 1, 2, or 3

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Exenatide0
Placebo0

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Increase of QTcP Interval From Baseline >30msec at Any Timepoint on Any Day in Exenatide and Placebo

Number of subjects with increase of QTcP interval from baseline >30 msec at any timepoint on any day was summarized by frequency for exenatide and placebo. (NCT01297062)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1, 2, or 3

Interventionparticpants (Number)
Exenatide0
Placebo0

[back to top]

Comparison of LS Mean Changes From Baseline in QTcP Intervals Between Exenatide and Placebo on Day 3 Averaged Over 1300h, 1400h, 1500h (Target Steady State Exenatide Concentration of 500 pg/mL)

Factors in QT correction formulas were first estimated using pre-therapy data. The most appropriate correction method (QTcP) minimized the mean squared individual QTc/RR regression slope with on-exenatide data. Adequacy of correction was validated with on-placebo data. Change from baseline in QTcP was analyzed by a MMRM between exenatide and placebo. (NCT01297062)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 3

Interventionmsec (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide-3.54
Placebo-2.41

[back to top]

Comparison of LS Mean Changes From Baseline in QTcP Intervals Between Exenatide and Placebo on Day 2 Averaged Over 1300h, 1400h, 1500h (Target Steady State Exenatide Concentration of 300 pg/mL)

Factors in QT correction formulas were first estimated using pre-therapy data. The most appropriate correction method (QTcP) minimized the mean squared individual QTc/RR regression slope with on-exenatide data. Adequacy of correction was validated with on-placebo data. Change from baseline in QTcP was analyzed by a MMRM between exenatide and placebo. (NCT01297062)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 2

Interventionmsec (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide-2.58
Placebo-0.56

[back to top]

Comparison of Least Squares (LS) Mean Changes From Baseline in Population-based Corrected QT Intervals (QTcP) Between Exenatide and Placebo on Day 1 Averaged Over 1300h, 1400h, 1500h (Target Steady State Exenatide Concentration of 200 pg/mL)

Factors in QT correction formulas were first estimated using pre-therapy data. The most appropriate correction method (QTcP) minimized the mean squared individual QTc/RR regression slope with on-exenatide data. Adequacy of correction was validated with on-placebo data. Change from baseline in QTcP was analyzed by a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) between exenatide and placebo. (NCT01297062)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1

Interventionmsec (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide-2.25
Placebo-0.89

[back to top]

Assay Sensitivity of Moxifloxacin at 1100h (2 Hour Post-administration of Moxifloxacin) on Day 2

Change from baseline in QTcP was analyzed by a MMRM between moxifloxacin and placebo. (NCT01297062)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 2

Interventionmsec (Least Squares Mean)
Moxifloxacin9.75
Placebo-0.81

[back to top]

Assay Sensitivity of Moxifloxacin at 1000h (1 Hour Post-administration of Moxifloxacin) on Day 2

Change from baseline in QTcP was analyzed by a MMRM between moxifloxacin and placebo. (NCT01297062)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 2

Interventionmsec (Least Squares Mean)
Moxifloxacin1.91
Placebo-3.56

[back to top]

Echocardiographic Measures - Longitudinal Strain

Potential change in cardiac function will be assessed by echocardiography before and after 3 months of study medication or placebo. (NCT01364584)
Timeframe: Baseline and 3 months

Intervention% difference in lengths (Mean)
Exenatide-18.5
Placebo-18.3

[back to top]

Echocardiographic Measures - Lateral E'

Potential change in cardiac function will be assessed by echocardiography before and after 3 months of study medication or placebo. (NCT01364584)
Timeframe: Baseline and 3 months

Interventioncentimeters/second (Mean)
Exenatide0.09
Placebo0.09

[back to top]

Echocardiographic Measures - Circumferential Strain

Potential change in cardiac function will be assessed by echocardiography before and after 3 months of study medication or placebo. (NCT01364584)
Timeframe: Baseline and 3 months

Intervention% difference in circumferences (Mean)
Exenatide-25.6
Placebo-22.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Arterial Stiffness

Pulse wave velocity will be measured via sphygmocor before and after 3 months of study medication or placebo. (NCT01364584)
Timeframe: Baseline and 3 months

Interventionmeters/second (Mean)
Exenatide-1.23
Placebo0.37

[back to top]

Echocardiographic Measures - Mitral Valve Deceleration Time

Potential change in cardiac function will be assessed by echocardiography before and after 3 months of study medication or placebo. (NCT01364584)
Timeframe: Baseline and 3 months

Interventionmilliseconds (Mean)
Exenatide234.6
Placebo239.8

[back to top]

Echocardiographic Measures - Septal E:E'

Potential change in cardiac function will be assessed by echocardiography before and after 3 months of study medication or placebo. (NCT01364584)
Timeframe: Baseline and 3 months

Interventionratio (Mean)
Exenatide8.3
Placebo12.6

[back to top]

Echocardiographic Measures - Mitral Valve E Wave Velocity

Potential change in cardiac function will be assessed by echocardiography before and after 3 months of study medication or placebo. (NCT01364584)
Timeframe: Baseline and 3 months

Interventioncentimeters/second (Mean)
Exenatide0.61
Placebo0.78

[back to top]

Oxygen Uptake Kinetics Steady State Tau

Time to steady state oxygen consumption will be assessed in subject before and after 3 months of study medication or placebo. (NCT01364584)
Timeframe: Baseline and 3 months

Interventionseconds (Mean)
Exenatide71.4
Placebo67.2

[back to top]

Peak Oxygen Consumption (VO2 Peak)

Subjects' peak oxygen consumption (VO2 peak) will be tested on a stationary bike before and after 3 months of study medication or placebo. (NCT01364584)
Timeframe: Baseline and 3 months

Interventionmilliliters per kilogram per minute (Mean)
Exenatide16.6
Placebo16.1

[back to top]

Echocardiographic Measures - Mitral Valve E:A Wave Velocity

Potential change in cardiac function will be assessed by echocardiography before and after 3 months of study medication or placebo. (NCT01364584)
Timeframe: Baseline and 3 months

Interventioncentimeters/second (Mean)
Exenatide0.85
Placebo0.82

[back to top]

Echocardiographic Measures - Septal E'

Potential change in cardiac function will be assessed by echocardiography before and after 3 months of study medication or placebo. (NCT01364584)
Timeframe: Baseline and 3 months

Interventioncentimeters/second (Mean)
Exenatide0.08
Placebo0.07

[back to top]

Echocardiographic Measures - Lateral E:E'

Potential change in cardiac function will be assessed by echocardiography before and after 3 months of study medication or placebo. (NCT01364584)
Timeframe: Baseline and 3 months

Interventionratio (Mean)
Exenatide6.7
Placebo8.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Peak Dilation of Brachial Artery Diameter

Change in the response of the brachial artery to hyperemia will be assessed before and after 3 months of study medication or placebo. (NCT01364584)
Timeframe: Baseline and 3 months

,
Interventionmillimeters (Mean)
Pre-Intervention (Baseline)Post-Intervention (3 months)
Exenatide0.1930.226
Placebo0.1920.151

[back to top]

Echocardiographic Measures - Stroke Volume

Potential change in cardiac function will be assessed by echocardiography before and after 3 months of study medication or placebo. (NCT01364584)
Timeframe: Baseline and 3 months

InterventionmL/beat (Mean)
Exenatide93.3
Placebo80.7

[back to top]

Determine Changes in Bone Resorption Markers During the Treatment With a GLP-1 Receptor Agonist (Exenatide) Compared to Placebo in Patients With T2DM.

Bone reabsorption by bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) was assessed. Distribution of the Difference between EX/PBO Low/High Dose and Baseline Levels were calculated. (NCT01381926)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 weeks

Interventionmg/L (Mean)
Exenatide 1st Then Placebo1.925
Placebo 1st Then Exenatide-0.20

[back to top]

Determine Changes in Bone Turnover Markers by Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase 5b (TRACP5b) During the Treatment With a GLP-1 Receptor Agonist (Exenatide) Compared to Placebo in Patients With T2DM.

Bone turnover by Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase 5b (TRACP5b) was assessed. Distribution of the Difference between EX/PBO Low/High Dose and Baseline Levels were calculated. (NCT01381926)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 weeks

InterventionU/L (Mean)
Exenatide 1st Then Placebo0.05
Placebo 1st Then Exenatide0.325

[back to top]

Determine Changes in Bone Turnover Markers by Serum N-Telo Peptide During the Treatment With a GLP-1 Receptor Agonist (Exenatide) Compared to Placebo in Patients With T2DM.

Bone turnover by Serum N-Telo peptide (NTX) was assessed. Distribution of the Difference between EX/PBO Low/High Dose and Baseline Levels were calculated (NCT01381926)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 weeks

InterventionnMBCE/L (Mean)
Exenatide Then Placebo-0.8
Placebo Then Exenatide1.725

[back to top]

Plasma Adipocytokines

the effect of the intervention on plasma adiponectin levels. (NCT01432405)
Timeframe: one year

Interventionmicrogram per ml (Mean)
Pioglitazone and Exenatide23.2
Pioglitazone15.8

[back to top]

Hepatic Fat

The effect of exenatide and pioglitazone on liver fat content after one year of treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes. (NCT01432405)
Timeframe: one year

Interventionpercent of liver fat (Mean)
Pioglitazone and Exenatide4.7
Pioglitazone6.5

[back to top]

Change in Weight

Change in weight (kg) after 6 months of treatment with study drug. Described as mean +/- SD (NCT01444898)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionkg (Mean)
Exenatide-.5

[back to top]

Appetite Scores

"Appetite scores using a syndrome-validated hyperphagia questionnaire~11 item questionnaire divided into subcategories of behavior (5 questions), drive (4 questions), severity (2 questions). Tallied and analyzed as total and subcategory scores. Each question scored 1-5 with higher scores correlating with worse hyperphagia.~Possible ranges: Total 11-55, behavior 5-25, drive 4-20, severity 2-10" (NCT01444898)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Total Appetite Score BaselineTotal Appetite Score 6 monthBehavior Score BaselineBehavior Score 6 monthsDrive Score BaselineDrive Score 6 monthsSeverity Score BaselineSeverity Score 6 months
Exenatide32.225.414.510.612.610.45.14.4

[back to top]

% Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)

Prior to analysis, distributions were evaluated for normality and natural log transformation was performed to analyse data not normally distributed. Data are presented as mean ±SD unless not normally distributed, in which case they are presented as median with intra-quartile ranges (25th and 75th percentiles). Within-subject changes between visits were analysed by mixed model repeated measures. When the overall F-test for difference among visits was significant, Dunnett-adjusted pairwise comparisons were made between baseline and each subsequent visit. (NCT01444898)
Timeframe: 6 months

Intervention% change in BMI (Mean)
Exenatide1.3

[back to top]

Change in Acy Ghr

(NCT01444898)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpg ml^-1 (Mean)
Exenatide263

[back to top]

Change in Insulin Levels

(NCT01444898)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionu/U ml^-1 (Mean)
Exenatide3

[back to top]

Change in Leptin

(NCT01444898)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionng ml^-1 (Mean)
Exenatide-7.4

[back to top]

Change in Pancreatic Peptide (PP)

(NCT01444898)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpg ml^-1 (Mean)
Exenatide15

[back to top]

Change in BMI Z-Score

(NCT01444898)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Exenatide.1

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c (%)

(NCT01444898)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
Exenatide-.3

[back to top]

Resting Energy Expenditure (Kcals Per Day)

Change in resting energy expenditure from baseline to 50 weeks (NCT01484873)
Timeframe: baseline, 50 weeks

Interventionkcal/day (Mean)
Exenatide-157.7

[back to top]

Insulin Secretion (Area Under the Curve)

Change in insulin secretion from baseline (NCT01484873)
Timeframe: baseline, 50 weeks

Intervention120 min*uU/mL x (Mean)
Exenatide-89.3

[back to top]

Gastric Emptying Rate (13C-octanoic Acid Isotope Excretion Half Life)

Change in the isotope excretion half life during a gastric emptying test at baseline and at 50 weeks (NCT01484873)
Timeframe: baseline, 50 weeks

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Exenatide12.9

[back to top]

Body Weight (kg)

Change in body weight from baseline to end of study (NCT01484873)
Timeframe: baseline, 50 weeks

Interventionkg (Mean)
Exenatide-1.4

[back to top]

Visual Analogue Scales for Post-meal Satiety

Change in visual analogue scales scores from baseline to 50 weeks. Higher score indicates greater satiety (minimum 0, maximum 100). (NCT01484873)
Timeframe: baseline, 50 weeks

Interventionmm (Mean)
Exenatide-2.5

[back to top]

HbA1C Levels

% of glycosylated hemoglobin in whole blood at 26 weeks (NCT01524705)
Timeframe: Baseline vs 26 weeks

Intervention% of HbA1C (Mean)
Insulin Glargine, Metformin, Exenatide7.1
Insulin Glargine, Metformin, Prandial Insulin7.2

[back to top]

Weight Change During Trial

Weight in kg at 26 weeks minus weight at baseline. (NCT01524705)
Timeframe: Baseline vs 26 weeks

Interventionkg (Mean)
Insulin Glargine, Metformin, Exenatide-4.8
Insulin Glargine, Metformin, Prandial Insulin0.7

[back to top]

Coefficient of Variation at 26 Weeks Minus Coefficient of Variation at Baseline

The change in the coefficient of variation (CV) of continuous glucose readings, as assessed by Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) (NCT01524705)
Timeframe: At baseline, 6 months of intervention

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
Insulin Glargine, Metformin, Exenatide-2.43
Insulin Glargine, Metformin, Prandial Insulin0.44

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hypoglycemia

Severe hypoglycemia-documented glucose <50mg/dl (participant journal), and hypoglycemic attacks requiring hospitalization, or treatment by emergency personnel. (NCT01524705)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Insulin Glargine, Metformin, Exenatide0
Insulin Glargine, Metformin, Prandial Insulin0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)

Change from baseline in HbA1c (%) to Week 24 during the controlled assessment period is reported as adjusted least square (LS) mean values. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication. A mixed model with repeated measures (MMRM) analysis was performed, excluding data collected after initiation of rescue medication or premature discontinuation of study medication. (NCT01554618)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

Interventionpercentage (% HbA1c) (Least Squares Mean)
Controlled Assessment Period - Exenatide-0.36
Controlled Assessment Period - Placebo0.49

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HbA1c to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)

Change from baseline in HbA1c (%) to Week 52 among patients who received open-label exenatide during the treatment period is reported as mean values. The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication. Data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded. (NCT01554618)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52

Interventionpercentage (% HbA1c) (Mean)
Treatment Period - Exenatide-0.10
Treatment Period - Placebo Then Exenatide0.53

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic) to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)

Change from baseline in SBP and DBP to Week 52 among patients who received open-label exenatide during the treatment period is reported as mean values. The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication. Data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded. (NCT01554618)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
SBPDBP
Treatment Period - Exenatide-0.71.1
Treatment Period - Placebo Then Exenatide-0.6-2.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HOMA-B and HOMA-S to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)

Change from baseline in HOMA-B and HOMA-S to Week 52 among patients who received open-label exenatide during the treatment period is reported as mean values. The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication. Data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded. (NCT01554618)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52

,
Interventionpercentage (%HOMA-B and %HOMA-S) (Mean)
HOMA-BHOMA-S
Treatment Period - Exenatide-2.589.85
Treatment Period - Placebo Then Exenatide42.022.36

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Lipids Profiles to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)

Change from baseline in lipid profiles to Week 52 among patients who received open-label exenatide during the treatment period is reported as mean values (SI units). The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined. The following lipids were assessed: total cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C, and triglycerides. All lipids presented were taken in a fasted state. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication. Data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded. (NCT01554618)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Total CholesterolHDL-CLDL-CTriglycerides
Treatment Period - Exenatide-0.1880.004-0.175-0.155
Treatment Period - Placebo Then Exenatide-0.255-0.076-0.152-0.043

[back to top]

Plasma Exenatide Concentrations to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)

Geometric mean plasma exenatide concentrations up to Week 52 during the treatment period are reported (for the placebo then exenatide treatment group, only Weeks 24 and 52 were applicable). The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined. Data collected after initiation of rescue medication were included. Data collected after discontinuation of study medication were excluded. (NCT01554618)
Timeframe: Samples were collected on Day 1 (Week 0), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24 and Week 52

Interventionpicograms per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
BaselineWeek 4Week 8Week 12Week 24Week 52
Treatment Period - ExenatideNA41.51130.60163.58140.8188.88

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Positive for Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Exenatide up to Week 24

Percentage of patients positive for ADAs up to Week 24 for the exenatide treatment group is reported. Baseline was the antibody measurement at Week 0 (Day 1). A negative or missing antibody measurement was considered negative at baseline. High positive = antibody titers ≥ 625, including baseline assessment. Low positive = antibody titers < 625, including baseline assessment. A patient was said to have treatment-emergent ADA positive at a visit if the antibody test was positive after the first dose of exenatide following a negative or missing antibody measurement, or the titer increased by at least 1 titration category from a detectable measurement prior to first dose of randomized study medication. (NCT01554618)
Timeframe: Samples were collected on Day 1 (Week 0), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4: High PositiveWeek 4: Low PositiveWeek 4: Treatment-Emergent ADA PositiveWeek 8: High PositiveWeek 8: Low PositiveWeek 8: Treatment-Emergent ADA PositiveWeek 12: High PositiveWeek 12: Low PositiveWeek 12: Treatment-Emergent ADA PositiveWeek 24: High PositiveWeek 24: Low PositiveWeek 24: Treatment-Emergent ADA Positive
Treatment Period - Exenatide17.030.245.353.838.592.360.038.098.040.855.195.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Reporting AEs of Injection Site Reactions up to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)

"Percentage of patients reporting injection site reactions at Week 24 and at each intermediate visit during the controlled assessment period is reported. Injection site reactions were presented from the AE case report form (CRF), based on the Injection site reactions higher level term. A controlled assessment period AE was defined as an AE starting on or after day of first dose of study medication up to but not including Week 24 for patients entering the extension period. For patients not entering the extension period, the period was defined up to and including last dose of study medication + 7 days (+ 90 days for SAEs and other clinically significant or related AEs)." (NCT01554618)
Timeframe: At Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18 and Week 24

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 18Week 24
Controlled Assessment Period - Exenatide8.53.51.900
Controlled Assessment Period - Placebo8.74.3000

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Reporting AEs of Injection Site Reactions up to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)

"Percentage of patients reporting injection site reactions at Week 52 and at each intermediate visit among patients who received open-label exenatide during the treatment period is reported. The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined. Injection site reactions were presented from the AE CRF, based on the Injection site reactions higher level term. An Extension Period AE was defined as an AE starting on or after day of first dose of open-label exenatide to last dose + 7 days (+ 90 days for SAEs and other clinically significant or related AEs)." (NCT01554618)
Timeframe: At Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 40 and Week 52

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 18Week 24Week 28Week 40Week 52
Treatment Period - Exenatide10.04.02.0004.000
Treatment Period - Placebo Then Exenatide9.14.5000000

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With On-Treatment Adverse Events (AEs) up to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)

A controlled assessment period AE was defined as an AE starting on or after day of first dose of study medication up to but not including Week 24 for patients entering the extension period. For patients not entering the extension period, the period was defined up to and including last dose of study medication + 7 days (+ 90 days for serious AEs [SAEs] and other clinically significant or related AEs). The Investigator assessed AEs for causal relationship to study drug medication. (NCT01554618)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Week 0) up to Week 24, plus up to a maximum of 90 days follow up

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Any AEAny AE with outcome of deathAny SAEAny AE leading to discontinuation of treatmentAny AE leading to discontinuation from studyAny AE related to treatment
Controlled Assessment Period - Exenatide61.003.40025.4
Controlled Assessment Period - Placebo73.904.30021.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Homeostasis Model Assessments - Beta-Cell Function (HOMA-B) and Insulin Sensitivity (HOMA-S) to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)

Change from baseline in HOMA-B and HOMA-S in patients who were not taking insulin to Week 24 during the controlled assessment period is reported as adjusted LS mean values. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication. A MMRM analysis was performed, excluding data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication. (NCT01554618)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

,
Interventionpercentage (%HOMA-B and %HOMA-S) (Least Squares Mean)
HOMA-BHOMA-S
Controlled Assessment Period - Exenatide63.980.62
Controlled Assessment Period - Placebo-26.397.37

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Lipid Profiles to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)

Change from baseline in lipid profiles to Week 24 during the controlled assessment period is reported as mean values (Standard International [SI] units). The following lipids were assessed: total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and triglycerides. All lipids presented were taken in a fasted state. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication. Data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded. (NCT01554618)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

,
Interventionmillimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Mean)
Total CholesterolHDL-CLDL-CTriglycerides
Controlled Assessment Period - Exenatide-0.117-0.035-0.050-0.122
Controlled Assessment Period - Placebo-0.114-0.047-0.1100.094

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Weight to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)

Change from baseline in body weight to Week 24 during the controlled assessment period is reported as adjusted LS mean values. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication. A MMRM analysis was performed, excluding data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication. (NCT01554618)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

Interventionkilogram (kg) (Least Squares Mean)
Controlled Assessment Period - Exenatide-0.59
Controlled Assessment Period - Placebo0.63

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Weight to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)

Change from baseline in body weight to Week 52 among patients who received open-label exenatide during the treatment period is reported as mean values. The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication. Data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded. (NCT01554618)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52

Interventionkg (Mean)
Treatment Period - Exenatide0.04
Treatment Period - Placebo Then Exenatide-0.04

[back to top]

Plasma Exenatide Concentrations to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)

Geometric mean plasma exenatide concentrations up to Week 52 during the treatment period are reported (for the placebo then exenatide treatment group, only Weeks 24 and 52 were applicable). The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined. Data collected after initiation of rescue medication were included. Data collected after discontinuation of study medication were excluded. (NCT01554618)
Timeframe: Samples were collected on Day 1 (Week 0), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24 and Week 52

Interventionpicograms per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Week 24Week 52
Treatment Period - Placebo Then ExenatideNA105.56

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)

Change from baseline in fasting insulin to Week 24 during the controlled assessment period is reported as adjusted LS mean values. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication. A MMRM analysis was performed, excluding data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication. (NCT01554618)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

Interventionpicomoles per liter (pmol/L) (Least Squares Mean)
Controlled Assessment Period - Exenatide79.6
Controlled Assessment Period - Placebo-15.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)

Change from baseline in fasting insulin to Week 52 among patients who received open-label exenatide during the treatment period is reported as mean values. The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication. Data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded. (NCT01554618)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52

Interventionpmol/L (Mean)
Treatment Period - Exenatide-32.4
Treatment Period - Placebo Then Exenatide121.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)

Change from baseline in SBP and DBP to Week 24 during the controlled assessment period is reported as adjusted LS mean values. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication. A MMRM analysis was performed, excluding data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication. (NCT01554618)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

,
Interventionmillimeters mercury (mmHg) (Least Squares Mean)
SBPDBP
Controlled Assessment Period - Exenatide-0.70.2
Controlled Assessment Period - Placebo2.2-1.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Concentration to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)

Change from baseline in FPG to Week 24 during the controlled assessment period is reported as adjusted LS mean values. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication. A MMRM analysis was performed, excluding data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication. (NCT01554618)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

Interventionmilligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) (Least Squares Mean)
Controlled Assessment Period - Exenatide-5.2
Controlled Assessment Period - Placebo16.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in FPG Concentration to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)

Change from baseline in FPG to Week 52 among patients who received open-label exenatide during the treatment period is reported as mean values. The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication. Data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded. (NCT01554618)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Treatment Period - Exenatide-1.8
Treatment Period - Placebo Then Exenatide10.6

[back to top]

Number of Patients Needing Rescue Medication Due to Failure to Maintain Glycemic Control up to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)

Number of patients needing rescue medication at Week 24 and at each intermediate visit during the controlled assessment period is reported. Patients with a loss of glycemic control, defined as either an increase from baseline in HbA1c values by ≥ 1.0% at 2 consecutive clinic visits that were at least 1 month apart, or a fasting plasma glucose value ≥ 250 mg/dL or random blood glucose value > 300 mg/dL for 4 days during a 7 day period, received rescue medication. Data collected after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded. (NCT01554618)
Timeframe: At Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18 and Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 18Week 24
Controlled Assessment Period - Exenatide00010
Controlled Assessment Period - Placebo00000

[back to top]

Number of Patients Needing Rescue Medication Due to Failure to Maintain Glycemic Control up to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)

Number of patients needing rescue medication at Week 52 and at each intermediate visit during the treatment period is reported. The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined. Patients with a loss of glycemic control, defined as either an increase from baseline in HbA1c values by ≥ 1.0% at 2 consecutive clinic visits that were at least 1 month apart, or a fasting plasma glucose value ≥ 250 mg/dL or random blood glucose value > 300 mg/dL for 4 days during a 7 day period, received rescue medication. Data collected after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded. (NCT01554618)
Timeframe: At Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 40 and Week 52

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Week 4Week 8Week 12Week 18Week 24Week 28Week 40Week 52
Treatment Period - Exenatide00010220
Treatment Period - Placebo Then Exenatide00000100

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving HbA1c Goals of < 6.5%, ≤ 6.5%, and < 7.0% to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)

The percentage of patients achieving HbA1c goals of < 6.5%, ≤ 6.5%, and < 7.0% at Week 52 among patients who received open-label exenatide during the treatment period is reported. The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined. Data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded. (NCT01554618)
Timeframe: At Week 52

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
HbA1c < 6.5%HbA1c ≤ 6.5%HbA1c < 7.0%
Treatment Period - Exenatide30.830.835.9
Treatment Period - Placebo Then Exenatide23.523.529.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c Goals of < 6.5%, ≤ 6.5%, and < 7.0% at Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)

The percentage of patients achieving HbA1c goals of < 6.5%, ≤ 6.5%, and < 7.0% at Week 24 during the controlled assessment period is reported. A Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) analysis was performed with missing data treated as non-responder, and excluding data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication. (NCT01554618)
Timeframe: At Week 24

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
HbA1c <6 .5%HbA1c ≤ 6.5%HbA1c < 7.0%
Controlled Assessment Period - Exenatide19.019.031.0
Controlled Assessment Period - Placebo4.24.28.3

[back to top]

Effect of Exenatide on Brain (Total Gray Matter) Glucose Metabolism

To study the acute effect of exenatide on brain glucose metabolism after the glucose load. Brain glucose uptake will be determined from serial FDG PET-imaging, by using graphical methods to quantify both global and regional results. The results obtained after Exenatide injection will be compared with the ones obtained after injection of placebo in the same subject. (NCT01588418)
Timeframe: 120 minutes after exenatide or placebo injection

Interventionμmol/(ml*min) (Mean)
total gray matter CMRglu after Exenatidetotal gray matter CMRglu after Placebo
Effect of Exenatide or Placebo on CMRglu0.140.10

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight

Change in body weight after 12 weeks of treatment with exenatide or placebo twice daily injections. This outcome compares baseline and 12 week body weight. (NCT01590433)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage weight loss (Mean)
Exenatide6.5
Placebo7.5

[back to top]

Change in 2-hour Postprandial Glucose Concentrations From Baseline to Week 16

Change in 2-hour postprandial glucose concentrations from baseline to Week 16. (NCT01652716)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Experimental: Exenatide QWS Suspension-87.00
Active Comparator: Exenatide BID-113.74

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight (kg) From Baseline to Week 28

Change in body weight (kg) from baseline to Week 28/Study Termination. (NCT01652716)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 28

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Experimental: Exenatide QWS Suspension-1.49
Active Comparator: Exenatide BID-1.89

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose Concentrations From Baseline to Week 28

Change in fasting plasma glucose concentrations from baseline to Week 28/Study Termination (NCT01652716)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 28

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Experimental: Exenatide QWS Suspension-32.7
Active Comparator: Exenatide BID-22.5

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c (Glycosylated Hemoglobin) From Baseline to Week 28

The primary objective of this study was to compare the effect on glycemic control (HbA1c) of exenatide suspension administered once weekly to that achieved by exenatide administered twice daily for 28 weeks in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. (NCT01652716)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 28

InterventionPercentage of total hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Experimental: Exenatide QWS Suspension-1.39
Active Comparator: Exenatide BID-1.02

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c <7% at Week 28

Percentage of subjects achieving HbA1c <7% at Week 28/Study Termination (NCT01652716)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 28

,
InterventionPercentage of subjects (Number)
Baseline YesBaseline NoWeek 28 YesWeek 28 NoBaseline missing
Active Comparator: Exenatide BID1.498.643.256.80
Experimental: Exenatide QWS Suspension3.995.249.349.80.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c <7% at Week 28

Percentage of subjects achieving HbA1c target values of < 7.0% at Week 28/Study Termination. (NCT01652729)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 28

,,
Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Baseline YesBaseline NoWeek 28 YesWeek 28 No
Active Comparator: Sitagliptin1.698.432.068.0
Experimental: Exenatide3.396.743.156.9
Placebo Comparator: Placebo3.396.724.675.4

[back to top]

Change in 2-hour Postprandial Glucose Concentrations From Baseline to Week 16 (Visit 8)

The change in 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose from baseline (Day 1) to Visit 8 (Week 16) was analyzed using a general linear model including treatment, and baseline HbA1c stratum (< 9% or ≥ 9%) as fixed factors, and the baseline 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose concentrations as a covariate. (NCT01652729)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Experimental: Exenatide-59.57
Active Comparator: Sitagliptin-23.61
Placebo Comparator: Placebo-38.68

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight (kg) From Baseline to Week 28

The change in body weight (kg) from baseline (Day 1) to Week 28/Study Termination. (NCT01652729)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 28

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Experimental: Exenatide-1.12
Active Comparator: Sitagliptin-1.19
Placebo Comparator: Placebo0.15

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose Concentrations From Baseline to Week 28

The change in fasting plasma glucose concentrations from baseline (Day 1) to Week 28/Study Termination. (NCT01652729)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 28

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Experimental: Exenatide-21.3
Active Comparator: Sitagliptin-11.3
Placebo Comparator: Placebo9.6

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c (Glycosylated Hemoglobin) From Baseline to Week 28

Absolute change in HbA1c from baseline (Day 1, Visit 3) to Week 28/Study Termination (Visit 11). Hypothesis testing on the primary endpoint followed a serial gated procedure with all tests carried out at a 2-sided significance level of 0.05 to protect the family-wise error rate. These tests were conducted sequentially, and are presented in the statistical analysis section below in the order in which they were performed; each test was the gatekeeper of later tests. (NCT01652729)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 28

Interventionpercentage of total hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Experimental: Exenatide-1.13
Active Comparator: Sitagliptin-0.75
Placebo Comparator: Placebo-0.40

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Postprandial AUC(0-8) of Insulin

The concentration of insulin in blood before and up to 8 hours after eating was plotted and the area under the curve calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule at Baseline and on Day 11. Least squares means of the change from Baseline to Day 11 were obtained using an ANCOVA model with treatment as fixed effect, and Baseline postprandial AUC (0-8) of insulin as a continuous covariate. (NCT01664624)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 11; samples were taken at -15 min and -5 min (pre-meal), and 15 min, 30 min, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 hours (post-meal).

Interventionpmol/L*hr (Least Squares Mean)
Roflumilast + Alogliptin-49.5
Alogliptin Alone107.8
Roflumilast Alone26.9
Exenatide-136.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Day 11 in 24-hour Average Plasma Glucose

Plasma glucose was measured by Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS). CGMS measures glucose every 5 minutes, starting in the fasting state 8 hour prior to the standardized breakfast (12 AM) until 16 hours after the breakfast. The average 24-hour plasma glucose concentration was calculated. Least squares means were obtained using an ANCOVA model with treatment as fixed effect, and Baseline 24-hour Glucose Measured by CGMS as a continuous covariate. (NCT01664624)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1) and Day 11, from 12 AM through 24 hours.

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Roflumilast + Alogliptin-25.4
Alogliptin Alone-17.5
Roflumilast Alone-14.5
Exenatide-34.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Day 11 in AUC(0-8) of Appetite Sensation

"Appetite sensations were measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) questionnaire. Participants were asked to indicate their level of fullness, hunger, satiety, and prospective consumption (how much do you think you can eat?) on a 100 mm line ranging from Not at all (0 mm) to extremely (100 mm). Appetite sensation scores before and up to 8 hours after eating were plotted and the area under the curve calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule at Baseline and on Day 11. Least squares means of the change from Baseline to Day 11 were obtained using an ANCOVA model with treatment as fixed effect, and Baseline postprandial AUC (0-8) of appetite sensation VAS score as a continuous covariate." (NCT01664624)
Timeframe: At Baseline and Day 11, every 30 minutes, starting 1 hour before eating until 8 hour after the meal.

,,,
Interventionmm*hr (Least Squares Mean)
FullnessHungerProspective consumptionSatiety
Alogliptin Alone62.03.1-14.9-3.2
Exenatide116.8-122.5-124.3-127.7
Roflumilast + Alogliptin70.5-103.6-97.1-82.7
Roflumilast Alone136.0-132.7-169.5-139.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in AUC(0-8) of Postprandial Plasma Glucose

The concentration of glucose in blood before and up to 8 hours after eating (postprandial) was plotted and the area under the curve calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule at Baseline and on Day 11. Least squares means of the change from Baseline to Day 11 were obtained using an ANCOVA model with treatment as fixed effect, and baseline postprandial AUC (0-8) of plasma glucose as a continuous covariate. (NCT01664624)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 11 at -15 min and -5 min (pre-meal), and 15 min, 30 min, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 hours (post-meal).

Interventionmmol/L*hr (Least Squares Mean)
Roflumilast + Alogliptin-13.4
Alogliptin Alone-9.8
Roflumilast Alone-9.0
Exenatide-18.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Postprandial Area Under the Curve From Time 0 to 8 Hours (AUC[0-8]) for Active Glucagon-like Peptide-1

The concentration of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) in blood before and up to 8 hours after eating (postprandial) was plotted and the area under the curve calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule at Baseline and on Day 11. Least squares means of the change from Baseline to Day 11 were obtained using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as fixed effect, and Baseline postprandial AUC (0-8) of active GLP-1 as a continuous covariate. (NCT01664624)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 11; samples were taken at -15 min and -5 min (pre-meal), and 15 min, 30 min, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 hours (post-meal).

Interventionpmol/L*hr (Least Squares Mean)
Roflumilast + Alogliptin26.5
Alogliptin Alone31.6
Roflumilast Alone3.8
Exenatide-2.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Postprandial AUC(0-8) of C-peptide

The concentration of C-peptide in blood before and up to 8 hours after eating (postprandial) was plotted and the area under the curve calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule at Baseline and on Day 11. Least squares means of the change from Baseline to Day 11 were obtained using an ANCOVA model with treatment as fixed effect, and Baseline postprandial AUC (0-8) of C-peptide as a continuous covariate. (NCT01664624)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 11; samples were taken at -15 min and -5 min (pre-meal), and 15 min, 30 min, and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 hours (post-meal).

Interventionng/mL*hr (Least Squares Mean)
Roflumilast + Alogliptin1.0
Alogliptin Alone1.4
Roflumilast Alone-0.7
Exenatide0.0

[back to top]

Responders Achieving Pre-defined Target: HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol)

Percentage of responders achieving pre-defined target for HbA1c - HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (48 mmol/mol). (NCT01676116)
Timeframe: Week 26

InterventionPercentage (Number)
Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide + Oral Anti Diabetic Drugs (OADs)63
Liraglutide or Exenatide + OADs22.6

[back to top]

Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) From Baseline (Randomisation, Visit 2)

(NCT01676116)
Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated haemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide + Oral Anti Diabetic Drugs (OADs)-1.32
Liraglutide or Exenatide + OADs-0.37

[back to top]

Number of Adverse Events (AEs)

Rate (events per 100 exposure years) of treatment-emergent adverse events (an event that had onset date (or an increase in severity) on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than 7 days after the last day of randomised treatment) which occurred during the 26 weeks of treatment. (NCT01676116)
Timeframe: After 26 weeks of treatment

Interventionevents per 100 exposure years (Number)
Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide + Oral Anti Diabetic Drugs (OADs)410.1
Liraglutide or Exenatide + OADs364.3

[back to top] [back to top]

Responders Achieving Pre-defined Target: HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol)

Percentage of subjects achieving HbA1c below 7.0% after 26 weeks of treatment. (NCT01676116)
Timeframe: Week 26

InterventionPercentage (Number)
Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide + Oral Anti Diabetic Drugs (OADs)75.3
Liraglutide or Exenatide + OADs35.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) Based on Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ).

Mean change in diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire (DTSQs) scores from baseline. The scores ranged from 0 to 6. Higher total score on a 0-6 point scale indicates a general higher treatment satisfaction, whereas higher score on perceived frequency of hyperglycaemia and perceived frequency of hypoglycaemia indicate that blood glucose levels are out of the target range. (NCT01676116)
Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Treatment satisfaction scale totalHyperglycaemiaHypoglycaemia
Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide + Oral Anti Diabetic Drugs (OADs)3.1-1.80.2
Liraglutide or Exenatide + OADs1.1-0.6-0.1

[back to top]

Number of Severe or Minor Hypoglycaemic Episodes

Rate (events per 100 patient years of exposure) of treatment-emergent confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes. The pool of severe and minor hypoglycaemic episodes was referred to as confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes. Severe hypoglycaemia was categorised as an episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. Minor hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as an episode with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia with confirmation by blood glucose <2.8 mmol/L (50 mg/dL) or PG <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL), and which was handled by the subject himself/herself, or any asymptomatic blood glucose value <2.8 mmol/L (50 mg/dL) or PG value <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL). (NCT01676116)
Timeframe: After 26 weeks of treatment

Interventionevents per 100 patient years of exposure (Number)
Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide + Oral Anti Diabetic Drugs (OADs)281.7
Liraglutide or Exenatide + OADs12.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Weight

Mean change in body weight after 26 weeks of treatment. (NCT01676116)
Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Interventionkg (Mean)
Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide + Oral Anti Diabetic Drugs (OADs)2
Liraglutide or Exenatide + OADs-0.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

Mean change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline, after 26 weeks of treatment. (NCT01676116)
Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide + Oral Anti Diabetic Drugs (OADs)-2.98
Liraglutide or Exenatide + OADs-0.6

[back to top]

Body Mass Index at Baseline and 16 Weeks

(NCT01791465)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionkg/m2 (Mean)
baseline16 weeks
Bydureon Treatment32.631.3

[back to top]

Body Weight at Baseline and 16 Weeks

(NCT01791465)
Timeframe: baseline and 16 weeks

Interventionkilograms (Mean)
baseline16 weeks
Bydureon Treatment10096

[back to top]

Peripheral Endothelial Tonography, as Measured by the Non-invasive EndoPAT System Using the LnRHI (Natural Log of Reactive Hyperemia Index), at Baseline and 16 Weeks

Normal: LnRHI > 0.51 Abnormal: LnRHI ≤ 0.51 (NCT01791465)
Timeframe: baseline and 16 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
baseline16 weeks
Bydureon Treatment0.710.62

[back to top]

Serum Adipokine Leptin Levels at Baseline and 16 Weeks

(NCT01791465)
Timeframe: baseline and 16 weeks

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
baseline16 weeks
Bydureon Treatment17.414.3

[back to top]

Serum Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Levels at Baseline and 16 Weeks

(NCT01791465)
Timeframe: baseline and 16 weeks

Interventionpercentage of glycated haemoglobin (Mean)
baseline16 weeks
Bydureon Treatment7.66.3

[back to top]

Serum HDL Cholesterol Levels at Baseline and 16 Weeks

(NCT01791465)
Timeframe: baseline and 16 weeks

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
baseline16 weeks
Bydureon Treatment3934

[back to top]

Serum Highly-sensitive C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels at Baseline and 16 Weeks

The primary outcome will be the change in hsCRP levels from baseline (pre-treatment) to 16 weeks of Bydureon treatment. (NCT01791465)
Timeframe: baseline and 16 weeks

Interventionmg/dl (Median)
baseline16 weeks
Bydureon Treatment4.05.6

[back to top]

Serum Interleukin 6 (IL-6) at Levels at Baseline and 16 Weeks

The primary outcome will be the change in serum IL-6 levels from baseline (pre-treatment) to 16 weeks of Bydureon treatment. (NCT01791465)
Timeframe: baseline and 16 weeks

Interventionmg/dl (Median)
baselineweek 16
Bydureon Treatment1.071.27

[back to top]

Oral Glucose Insulin Sensitivity (OGIS) at Baseline and 16 Weeks

The Oral Glucose Insulin Sensitivity (OGIS) is a method for the assessment of insulin sensitivity from the oral glucose tolerance test. OGIS provides an index which is analogous to the index of insulin sensitivity obtained from the glucose clamp. OGIS values for glucose clearance are reported in units of ml/min per square meter of body surface area. Lower values indicate slower glucose clearance and higher insulin resistance. (NCT01791465)
Timeframe: baseline and 16 weeks

Interventionml/min/m^2 BSA (Mean)
baseline16 weeks
Bydureon Treatment310399

[back to top]

Serum Total Cholesterol Levels at Baseline and 16 Weeks

(NCT01791465)
Timeframe: baseline and 16 weeks

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
baseline16 weeks
Bydureon Treatment192176

[back to top]

Waist Circumference at Baseline and 16 Weeks

(NCT01791465)
Timeframe: baseline and 16 weeks

Interventioncentimeters (Mean)
baseline16 weeks
Bydureon Treatment113113

[back to top]

Waist to Hip Ratio at Baseline and 16 Weeks

(NCT01791465)
Timeframe: baseline and 16 weeks

Interventionratio (Mean)
baseline16 weeks
Bydureon Treatment1.061.06

[back to top]

Hip Circumference at Baseline and 16 Weeks

(NCT01791465)
Timeframe: baseline and 16 weeks

Interventioncentimeters (Mean)
baseline16 weeks
Bydureon Treatment107103

[back to top]

Serum Triglycerides Levels at Baseline and 16 Weeks

(NCT01791465)
Timeframe: baseline and 16 weeks

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
baseline16 weeks
Bydureon Treatment172118

[back to top]

Serum Macrophage Chemotactic Protein-1 (MCP-1) Levels at Baseline and 16 Weeks

(NCT01791465)
Timeframe: baseline and 16 weeks

Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
baseline16 weeks
Bydureon Treatment5.734.78

[back to top]

Serum Macrophage Inflammatory Protein 1 Alpha (MIP-1 Alpha) Levels at Baseline and 16 Weeks

(NCT01791465)
Timeframe: baseline and 16 weeks

Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
baseline16 weeks
Bydureon Treatment0.0880.081

[back to top]

Serum LDL Cholesterol Levels at Baseline and 16 Weeks

(NCT01791465)
Timeframe: baseline and 16 weeks

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
baseline16 weeks
Bydureon Treatment127109

[back to top]

Serum Soluble CD14 Levels at Baseline and 16 Weeks

(NCT01791465)
Timeframe: baseline and 16 weeks

Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
baseline16 weeks
Bydureon Treatment598671

[back to top]

Serum Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF-α) Levels at Baseline and 16 Weeks

(NCT01791465)
Timeframe: baseline and 16 weeks

Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
baseline16 weeks
Bydureon Treatment2.442.82

[back to top]

Serum TNF-a Receptor 1 Levels at Baseline and 16 Weeks

(NCT01791465)
Timeframe: baseline and 16 weeks

Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
baseline16 weeks
Bydureon Treatment392399

[back to top]

Serum TNF-a Receptor 2 Levels at Baseline and 16 Weeks

(NCT01791465)
Timeframe: baseline and 16 weeks

Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
baseline16 weeks
Bydureon Treatment598671

[back to top]

To Characterize the Pharmacokinetic Profile of ITCA 650 in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Change in HbA1c from baseline (NCT01798264)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
10 Mcg/Day-0.5
20 Mcg/Day-0.6
40 Mcg/Day-0.5
80 Mcg/Day-0.7

[back to top] [back to top]

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) 4 Weeks From Baseline

(NCT01798264)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
10 Mcg/Day-5.6
20 Mcg/Day-31.2
40 Mcg/Day-42.0
80 Mcg/Day-28.8

[back to top]

Change in Weight From Baseline to 4 Weeks

(NCT01798264)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionkg (Mean)
10 Mcg/Day-0.3
20 Mcg/Day-0.3
40 Mcg/Day-1.1
80 Mcg/Day-3.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Weight

Mean change in body weight from baseline to week 56. (NCT01885208)
Timeframe: Week 0, week 56

Interventionkilograms (Least Squares Mean)
Semaglutide 1.0 mg-5.63
Exenatide ER 2.0 mg-1.85

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

Mean change in FPG from baseline to week 56. (NCT01885208)
Timeframe: Week 0, week 56

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Semaglutide 1.0 mg-51.22
Exenatide ER 2.0 mg-36.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)

Mean change in HbA1c from baseline to week 56. (NCT01885208)
Timeframe: Week 0, week 56

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated haemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Semaglutide 1.0 mg-1.54
Exenatide ER 2.0 mg-0.92

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Questionnaire Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire Status (DTSQs)

The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQs) was used to assess a subject's treatment satisfaction. This questionnaire contained 8 components and measures the treatment for diabetes (including insulin, tablets and/or diet) in terms of convenience, flexibility and general feelings regarding treatment. The value presented is the 'Treatment Satisfaction' summary score, which is the sum of 6 of the 8 items of the DTSQs questionnaire. Response options range from 6 (best case) to 0 (worst case). Total scores for treatment satisfaction range from 0-36. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction. (NCT01885208)
Timeframe: Week 0, week 56

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Semaglutide 1.0 mg4.98
Exenatide ER 2.0 mg3.96

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure

Mean changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure from baseline to week 56. (NCT01885208)
Timeframe: Week 0, week 56

,
Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Systolic blood pressureDiastolic blood pressure
Exenatide ER 2.0 mg-2.23-0.1
Semaglutide 1.0 mg-4.6-1.0

[back to top]

Major Hypoglycemic Event Rate Off Drug

The hypoglycemic event rate was calculated for patients while on and off study drug. The event rate is calculated using the number of events divided by the number of months either on or off study drug. Major hypoglycemic events are categorized as an event with a blood glucose level < 55 mg/dL. (NCT01928329)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionevents per month (Median)
Exenatide (Bydureon)0.33
Placebo0.50

[back to top]

Major Hypoglycemic Event Rate On Drug

The hypoglycemic event rate was calculated for patients while on and off study drug. The event rate is calculated using the number of events divided by the number of months either on or off study drug. Major hypoglycemic events are categorized as an event with a blood glucose level < 55 mg/dL. (NCT01928329)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months

Interventionevents per month (Median)
Exenatide (Bydureon)0.67
Placebo0.80

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HbA1c Levels

(NCT01928329)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionmmol/mol (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide (Bydureon)0.08
Placebo0.10

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HbA1c Levels

(NCT01928329)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionmmol/mol (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide (Bydureon)-0.12
Placebo0.11

[back to top]

Myocardial Fat Content

Myocardial fat content following intervention as measured by magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy (MRS) in patients with type 2 diabetes. (NCT01951651)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of myocardium content (Mean)
Exenatide1.7
Glipizide1.1

[back to top]

Monocyte Inflammatory Protein Nuclear Factor Kappa-B (NFkappaB) (%)

The percentage change in monocyte inflammatory proteins NFkappaB (%) from baseline. (NCT01951651)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage change from baseline (Mean)
Exenatide-65.0
Glipizide0.0

[back to top]

Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)(%).

Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction following intervention as measured by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with type 2 diabetes. (NCT01951651)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercent of Left ventricular function (Mean)
Exenatide60
Glipizide56

[back to top]

Hepatic Fat Content

Hepatic fat content following intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes (NCT01951651)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercent of hepatic fat (Mean)
Exenatide10.9
Glipizide13.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Bone Metabolism at 12-Week Endpoint (Beta-Crosslaps and Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide [P1NP])

LS means were calculated using MMRM analysis adjusting for metformin use, washout of second OAM, baseline HbA1c category, treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, baseline as a covariate, and participant as a random effect (excludes data after rescue therapy). (NCT02020616)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,,,
Interventionnanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) (Least Squares Mean)
Beta-CrosslapsP1NP
100 mg LY30531020.004-6.8
15 mg LY3053102-0.0230.9
2 mg Exenatide ER-0.0102.3
200 mg LY30531020.031-0.2
50 mg LY30531020.0011.9
7 mg LY3053102-0.033-0.3
Placebo-0.0385.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at 12-Week Endpoint

LS means were calculated using MMRM analysis adjusting for baseline HbA1c category, metformin use, washout of second OAM, treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, baseline as a covariate, and participant as a random effect (excludes data after rescue therapy). (NCT02020616)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionkilogram (kg) (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.7
7 mg LY30531021.5
15 mg LY30531020.0
50 mg LY30531020.4
100 mg LY3053102-1.7
200 mg LY3053102-2.0
2 mg Exenatide ER-0.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at 12-Week Endpoint

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over prolonged periods of time. Least Squares (LS) means were calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis adjusting for metformin use, washout of second oral anti-hyperglycemic medication (OAM), treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, baseline as a covariate, and participant as a random effect. (NCT02020616)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

InterventionPercent of HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.49
7 mg LY3053102-0.70
15 mg LY3053102-0.75
50 mg LY3053102-0.22
100 mg LY3053102-0.48
200 mg LY3053102-0.52
2 mg Exenatide ER-1.43

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants That Require Rescue Therapy

Percentage of participants that required >=1 rescue (blood glucose lowering) medications. (NCT02020616)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 12

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo0.0
7 mg LY30531020.0
15 mg LY305310212.5
50 mg LY305310214.3
100 mg LY30531020.0
200 mg LY30531020.0
2 mg Exenatide ER0.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies to LY3053102

Percentage of participants with anti-LY3053102 antibody titre changes from baseline to the maximum postbaseline value. (NCT02020616)
Timeframe: Baseline through Study Completion (Up to 6 Months)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo0
7 mg LY30531021
15 mg LY30531021
50 mg LY30531020
100 mg LY30531022
200 mg LY30531022
2 mg Exenatide ER2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Hypoglycemia

Hypoglycemia was defined as any event meeting the criteria for documented symptomatic hypoglycemia, asymptomatic hypoglycemia, or probable symptomatic hypoglycemia. (NCT02020616)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 12

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo10.0
7 mg LY305310212.5
15 mg LY30531020.0
50 mg LY30531020.0
100 mg LY305310212.5
200 mg LY305310212.5
2 mg Exenatide ER20.0

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve During One Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUC [τ,ss]) of LY3053102

AUC (τ,ss) = area under the concentration versus time curve during one dosing interval at steady state, where the dosing interval (τ) = 168 hours. (NCT02020616)
Timeframe: Predose, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 168 hours post-dose

Interventionmicrogram•hour/milliliter (µg•h/mL) (Geometric Mean)
7 mg LY305310222.6
15 mg LY305310276.8
50 mg LY3053102190.0
100 mg LY3053102350.0
200 mg LY3053102917.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 7-Point Blood Glucose Profile at 12-Week Endpoint

7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose profiles are measures of blood glucose concentration taken 7 times a day at morning pre-prandial, morning 2 hours postprandial, midday pre-prandial, midday 2 hours postprandial, evening pre-prandial, evening 2 hour postprandial, and bedtime. LS means were calculated using MMRM analysis adjusting for baseline HbA1c category, metformin use, washout of second OAM, treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, baseline as a covariate, and participant as a random effect (excludes data after rescue therapy). (NCT02020616)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,,,
Interventionmilligram/deciliter (mg/dL) (Least Squares Mean)
Morning Meal (Post- minus Pre-prandial)Midday Meal (Post- minus Pre-prandial)Evening Meal (Post- minus Pre-prandial)Bedtime
100 mg LY30531024.72.5-39.04.9
15 mg LY3053102-57.7-55.0-46.5-44.5
2 mg Exenatide ER-47.9-31.3-4.9-53.6
200 mg LY3053102-26.8-24.6-61.3-13.0
50 mg LY3053102-34.9-24.7-25.9-10.1
7 mg LY3053102-18.7-31.3-11.118.8
Placebo-23.4-1.1-18.83.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Bone Metabolism at 12-Week Endpoint (Osteocalcin and Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase [Bone-Specific ALP])

LS means were calculated using MMRM analysis adjusting for metformin use, washout of second OAM, baseline HbA1c category, treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, baseline as a covariate, and participant as a random effect (excludes data after rescue therapy). (NCT02020616)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,,,
Interventionmicrogram/liter (ug/L) (Least Squares Mean)
OsteocalcinBone-Specific ALP
100 mg LY3053102-2.6-1.9
15 mg LY3053102-1.7-0.2
2 mg Exenatide ER0.3-2.3
200 mg LY3053102-0.2-0.3
50 mg LY30531020.0-1.9
7 mg LY3053102-0.7-0.1
Placebo1.20.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density Markers at 12-Week Endpoint

LS means were calculated using MMRM analysis adjusting for metformin use, washout of second OAM, baseline HbA1c category, treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, baseline as a covariate, and participant as a random effect (excludes data after rescue therapy). (NCT02020616)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,,,
Interventionmilligram/square centimeter (mg/cm2) (Least Squares Mean)
L1-L4 Intervertebral SpaceNeck of FemurTotal Hip
100 mg LY30531022.0-0.30.1
15 mg LY30531021.2-0.4-0.7
2 mg Exenatide ER1.8-2.1-1.0
200 mg LY30531021.6-1.2-0.7
50 mg LY30531021.0-0.8-1.0
7 mg LY3053102-0.4-0.6-0.6
Placebo1.40.20.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Lipids at 12-Week Endpoint

Lipids includes: High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (HDL-C), Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C), Triglycerides, and Cholesterol. LS means were calculated using MMRM analysis adjusting for metformin use, washout of second OAM, baseline HbA1c category, treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, baseline as a covariate, and participant as a random effect (excludes data after rescue therapy). (NCT02020616)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
HDL-CLDL-C
100 mg LY30531026.0-2.2
15 mg LY30531029.3-25.6
2 mg Exenatide ER-2.3-19.9
200 mg LY305310211.4-7.3
50 mg LY30531026.4-6.5
7 mg LY30531026.06.8
Placebo1.012.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving HbA1c <7.0% or HbA1c ≤6.5% at 12-Week Endpoint

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over prolonged periods of time. (NCT02020616)
Timeframe: Week 12

,,,,,,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
HbA1c <7.0%HbA1c ≤6.5%
100 mg LY30531020.00.0
15 mg LY305310240.00.0
2 mg Exenatide ER83.366.7
200 mg LY30531020.00.0
50 mg LY305310220.00.0
7 mg LY305310214.30.0
Placebo0.00.0

[back to top]

Median Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay

Defined as the number of days admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (NCT02058940)
Timeframe: From enrollment to 30 days post study drug discontinuation

Interventiondays (Median)
Exenatide9.0

[back to top]

Median Insulin Use

Calculated from number of insulin units administered over 48 hours starting at infusion initiation (NCT02058940)
Timeframe: Over 48 hours from infusion initiation

Interventionunits/kg (Median)
Exenatide0.03

[back to top]

Median Hospital Length of Stay

Defined as the number of days admitted to the hospital (NCT02058940)
Timeframe: From enrollment to 30 days post study drug discontinuation

Interventiondays (Median)
Exenatide12.5

[back to top]

Median Glucose Concentration During Exenatide Infusion

Calculated from hourly blood glucose samples starting at infusion initiation over 48 hours (NCT02058940)
Timeframe: Over 48 hours from infusion initiation

Interventionmg/dL (Median)
Exenatide137.0

[back to top]

Glycemic Variability

Glycemic variability is defined as the standard deviation of glucose calculated from hourly glucose measurements starting at infusion initiation over 48 hours (NCT02058940)
Timeframe: Over 48 hours from infusion initiation

Interventionmg/dL (Median)
Exenatide22.2

[back to top]

Correlation of Exenatide Concentrations With Creatinine Clearance

Spearman's correlation coefficient calculated from exenatide concentrations and urine creatinine measurements collected for all patients during the study period. A correlation coefficient is a numerical measure of some type of correlation, meaning a statistical relationship between two variables. Spearman's correlation coefficient assumes values in the range from -1 to +1, where +1 indicates the strongest possible agreement and -1 the strongest possible disagreement. (NCT02058940)
Timeframe: Over 48 hours from infusion initiation

Interventioncorrelation coefficient (Number)
Exenatide-0.2

[back to top]

Median Time to Reach Glucose Measurements Within Goal Range (110-180 mg/dL)

Calculated from hourly blood glucose samples starting at infusion initiation over 48 hours (NCT02058940)
Timeframe: Over 48 hours from infusion initiation

Interventionminutes (Median)
Exenatide200.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Critically Ill Patients With Acute Brain Injury Achieving Pre-specified Feasibility Criteria

Feasibility is defined as the percentage of patients 1) experiencing severe hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL); 2) achieving glucose measurements within goal (110-180 mg/dL); and 3) experiencing nausea requiring discontinuation of exenatide therapy. The pre-specified criteria for determining feasibility includes the following: 1) at least 75% of patients achieving glucose measurements within goal (110-180 mg/dL) and 2) no more than 25% of patients experiencing severe hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL) or nausea requiring exenatide discontinuation. (NCT02058940)
Timeframe: Over 48 hours from infusion initiation

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Percentage Experiencing Severe HypoglycemiaPercentage Achieving Glucose within GoalPercentage with Nausea Requiring Discontinuation
Exenatide087.50

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With >1 Episode of Hypotensive Episode (SBP<100 mmHg)

Calculated from blood pressure measurements starting at infusion initiation over 48 hours (NCT02058940)
Timeframe: Over 48 hours from infusion initiation

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Exenatide12.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Hypotensive Episodes (SBP<100 mmHg)

Defined as the number of hypotensive episodes (SBP<100 mmHg)for all patients/total number of blood pressure measurements collected for all patients. (NCT02058940)
Timeframe: Over 48 hours from infusion initiation

Interventionpercentage of measurements (Number)
Exenatide1.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With >1 Episode of Hypoglycemia (<80 mg/dL)

Calculated from hourly blood glucose samples starting at infusion initiation over 48 hours (NCT02058940)
Timeframe: Over 48 hours from infusion initiation

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Exenatide12.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Requiring Rescue Insulin Infusion Protocol

Defined as the percentage of patients requiring an insulin infusion to control glucose concentrations during exenatide treatment (NCT02058940)
Timeframe: Over 48 hours from infusion initiation

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Exenatide0

[back to top]

Percentage of Hypoglycemic Episodes (<80 mg/dL)

Percentage of hypoglycemic episodes is calculated as the total number of glucose measurements <80 mg/dL for all patients/total number of glucose measurements collected for all patients. (NCT02058940)
Timeframe: Over 48 hours from infusion initiation

Interventionpercentage of measurements (Number)
Exenatide1.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Glucose Measurements Within Goal Range

Percentage of glucose measurements within goal range is calculated as the number of glucose measurements within goal range (110-180 mg/dL) for all patients/total number of glucose measurements collected for all patients. (NCT02058940)
Timeframe: Over 48 hours from infusion initiation

Interventionpercentage of measurements (Number)
Exenatide69.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)

(NCT02072096)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 72

Interventionkilogram per square meter (kg/m^2) (Mean)
Strategy A (Glucose-Dependent)-0.47
Strategy B (Reference)0.20

[back to top]

Change From Baseline of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)

The eGFR is used in addition to the Urinary Albumin to Creatinine Ratio to measure the incidence and progression of diabetic kidney disease. (NCT02072096)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 72

Interventionmilliliter per minute/1.73 square meter (Mean)
Strategy A (Glucose-Dependent)-5.00
Strategy B (Reference)-5.88

[back to top]

Change From Baseline of Urinary Albumin to Creatinine Ratio

The Urinary Albumin to Creatinine Ratio is used in addition to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) to measure the incidence and progression of diabetic kidney disease. (NCT02072096)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 72

Interventionmilligram per millimole (mg/mmol) (Mean)
Strategy A (Glucose-Dependent)1.85
Strategy B (Reference)1.85

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving and Maintaining Individualized Glycated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Targets Without Clinically Significant Hypoglycemia

Failed to reach and maintain HbA1c target, without clinically significant hypoglycemia, is defined as having 2 consecutive HbA1c > upper limit of HbA1c target over 12 weeks starting from Week 24 for participants with HbA1c data beyond Week 24, or Week 24 HbA1c > upper limit of HbA1c target for participants without HbA1c data beyond Week 24. Clinically significant hypoglycemia is defined as any severe hypoglycemia or repeated hypoglycemia interrupting participants activities or sleep and associated with blood glucose ≤3.9 millimole per liter (mmol/L), or repeated asymptomatic hypoglycemia associated with blood glucose <3.0 mmol/L. Success is defined as lacking of failure. (NCT02072096)
Timeframe: Baseline to last participant visit (up to 72 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Strategy A (Glucose-Dependent)64.5
Strategy B (Reference)54.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Total Hypoglycemia and Other Categories of Hypoglycemia

(NCT02072096)
Timeframe: Baseline to last participant visit (up to 72 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Total HypoglycemiaSevere HypoglycemiaClinically Significant HypoglycemiaSymptomatic HypoglycemiaAsymptomatic HypoglycemiaProbable Symptomatic HypoglycemiaUnspecified HypoglycemiaRelative HypoglycemiaNocturnal Hypoglycemia
Strategy A (Glucose-Dependent)1000580214
Strategy B (Reference)5001343077610

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Requiring Alternative Treatment Due to Glycemic Failure of First Line Injectable Therapy

(NCT02072096)
Timeframe: Baseline to last participant visit (up to 72 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Strategy A (Glucose-Dependent)21
Strategy B (Reference)13

[back to top]

Triglycerides

triglycerides (NCT02104739)
Timeframe: 2 hours after ingestion of meal

Interventionmilligrams per deciliter (Mean)
Exenatide119
Saxagliptin130
Placebo163
Exenatide Extended-release (ER)168

[back to top]

Triglycerides

triglycerides (NCT02104739)
Timeframe: 4 hours after ingestion of meal

Interventionmilligrams per deciliter (Mean)
Exenatide124
Saxagliptin153
Placebo206

[back to top]

Triglycerides

triglycerides (NCT02104739)
Timeframe: 6 hours after ingestion of meal

Interventionmilligrams per deciliter (Mean)
Exenatide161
Saxagliptin179
Placebo200

[back to top]

Triglycerides

triglycerides (NCT02104739)
Timeframe: baseline

Interventionmilligrams per deciliter (Mean)
Exenatide108
Saxagliptin101
Placebo102
Exenatide Extended-release (ER)106

[back to top]

Free Fatty Acids

Free Fatty Acids (NCT02104739)
Timeframe: 2 hours after meal

Interventionmillimoles per liter (Mean)
Exenatide0.35
Saxagliptin0.18
Placebo0.17
Exenatide Extended-release (ER)0.19

[back to top]

Free Fatty Acids

Free Fatty Acids (NCT02104739)
Timeframe: 4 hours after meal

Interventionmillimoles per liter (Mean)
Exenatide0.43
Saxagliptin0.24
Placebo0.23

[back to top]

Free Fatty Acids

Free Fatty Acids (NCT02104739)
Timeframe: 6 hours after meal

Interventionmillimoles per liter (Mean)
Exenatide0.29
Saxagliptin0.31
Placebo0.33

[back to top]

Free Fatty Acids

Free Fatty Acids (NCT02104739)
Timeframe: baseline

Interventionmillimoles per liter (Mean)
Exenatide0.45
Saxagliptin0.49
Placebo0.51
Exenatide Extended-release (ER)0.65

[back to top]

Monocyte NfkB Levels as Detected by Western Blotting

Monocyte NfkB p65 arbitrary units are quantified by densitometric analysis of the Western blots. (NCT02104739)
Timeframe: 2 hours after ingestion of meal

InterventionNfkB p65 arbitrary units (Mean)
Exenatide67.39
Saxagliptin68.39
Placebo71.37
Exenatide Extended-release (ER)93.47

[back to top]

Monocyte NfkB Levels as Detected by Western Blotting

Monocyte NfkB p65 arbitrary units are quantified by densitometric analysis of the Western blots. (NCT02104739)
Timeframe: baseline

InterventionNfkB p65 arbitrary units (Mean)
Exenatide62.79
Saxagliptin72.03
Placebo67.68
Exenatide Extended-release (ER)84.19

[back to top]

Peak Forearm Blood Flow

Peak forearm blood flow via strain gauge venous occlusion plethysmography (NCT02104739)
Timeframe: 3 hours after meal

InterventionmL per minute per 100mL of tissue (Mean)
Exenatide13.18
Saxagliptin13.25
Placebo15.11
Exenatide Extended-release (ER)16.54

[back to top]

Peak Forearm Blood Flow

Peak forearm blood flow via strain gauge venous occlusion plethysmography (NCT02104739)
Timeframe: 6 hours after meal

InterventionmL per minute per 100mL of tissue (Mean)
Exenatide14.25
Saxagliptin15.87
Placebo13.45

[back to top]

Peak Forearm Blood Flow

Peak forearm blood flow via strain gauge venous occlusion plethysmography (NCT02104739)
Timeframe: baseline

InterventionmL per minute per 100mL of tissue (Mean)
Exenatide12.65
Saxagliptin12.79
Placebo12.18
Exenatide Extended-release (ER)16.18

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glucagon Levels

LSM are calculated from MMRM analysis using REML with metformin use, baseline BMI category, baseline HbA1c category, country, treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, baseline parameter result as a covariate, and participant as a random effect. (NCT02119819)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12; Baseline, Week 24

,,,,,
Interventionpicomol per liter (pmol/L) (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24
10 mg LY2944876-1.26-2.30
15 mg LY2944876-2.65-2.25
30 mg LY2944876-5.14-4.40
50 mg LY2944876-6.21-4.93
Exenatide Extended-release-1.58-0.19
Placebo-0.040.66

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight

(NCT02119819)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12; Baseline, Week 24

,,,,,
InterventionPercentage change (Mean)
Week 12Week 24
10 mg LY2944876-1.09-1.57
15 mg LY2944876-1.86-2.13
30 mg LY2944876-2.01-1.98
50 mg LY2944876-3.23-3.41
Exenatide Extended-release-2.04-2.18
Placebo-1.22-1.70

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Fibroblast Growth Factor 21

LSM was calculated from MMRM analysis using REML with metformin use, baseline BMI category, baseline HbA1c category, country, treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, baseline parameter result as a covariate, and participant as a random effect. (NCT02119819)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12; Baseline, Week 24

,,,,,
Interventionmicrogram per liter (µg/L) (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24
10 mg LY2944876-0.070.06
15 mg LY29448760.06-0.04
30 mg LY2944876-0.03-0.07
50 mg LY2944876-0.14-0.12
Exenatide Extended-release-0.09-0.06
Placebo-0.11-0.09

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Lipids

Change from baseline in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). LSM was calculated from MMRM analysis using REML with metformin use, baseline BMI category, baseline HbA1c category, country, treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, baseline parameter result as a covariate, and participant an a random effect. (NCT02119819)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
HDL-CTotal CholesterolTriglyceridesLDL-C
10 mg LY29448761.56-1.26-14.63-1.37
15 mg LY29448760.92-1.12-13.32-0.40
30 mg LY29448760.90-1.46-15.40-0.24
50 mg LY29448761.04-5.11-20.96-0.04
Exenatide Extended-release2.35-0.12-11.830.37
Placebo2.177.3210.614.55

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Developing Anti-Drug Antibodies to LY2944876

Percentage of participants developing anti-drug antibodies to LY2944876. (NCT02119819)
Timeframe: Week 12 and Week 24

,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 12Week 24
10 mg LY29448761.71.8
15 mg LY29448761.40
30 mg LY29448761.51.5
50 mg LY294487600
Exenatide Extended-release1.60
Placebo00

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Concentration Curve (AUC) of LY2944876

Evaluable pharmacokinetic concentrations from the specified timepoints were combined and utilized in a population approach to determine the population mean estimate and standard deviation at steady-state. (NCT02119819)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24

Interventionnanograms*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL) (Mean)
10 mg LY294487688100
15 mg LY2944876117000
30 mg LY2944876247000
50 mg LY2944876381000

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Requiring Rescue Therapy

Participants who received rescue medication with non-study antihyperglycemic medications or change their stable dose of metformin. (NCT02119819)
Timeframe: Baseline through Therapy Completion (Week 24)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
10 mg LY29448766.1
15 mg LY29448762.8
30 mg LY29448762.7
50 mg LY29448764.3
Exenatide Extended-release2.9
Placebo11.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 24

HbA1c is the glycosylated fraction of hemoglobin A. HbA1c is measured to identify average plasma glucose concentration over prolonged periods of time. (NCT02119819)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercentage of HbA1c (Mean)
10 mg LY2944876-0.85
15 mg LY2944876-1.14
30 mg LY2944876-1.37
50 mg LY2944876-1.29
Exenatide Extended-release-1.48
Placebo-0.38

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Insulin Levels

LSM are calculated from MMRM analysis using REML with metformin use, baseline BMI category, baseline HbA1c category, country, treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, baseline parameter result as a covariate, and participant as a random effect. (NCT02119819)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12; Baseline, Week 24

,,,,,
Interventionmicro-international units/milliliter (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24
10 mg LY29448760.30-1.44
15 mg LY29448760.970.68
30 mg LY29448760.030.58
50 mg LY29448760.960.34
Exenatide Extended-release2.781.97
Placebo-0.851.45

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose

Least square means (LSM) was calculated from mixed-effects model with repeated measures (MMRM) analysis using restricted maximum likelihood (REML) with metformin use, baseline body mass index (BMI) category, baseline HbA1c category, country, treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, baseline fasting blood glucose as a covariate, and participant as a random effect. (NCT02119819)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12; Baseline, Week 24

,,,,,
Interventionmilligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24
10 mg LY2944876-20.881-21.497
15 mg LY2944876-21.991-30.186
30 mg LY2944876-31.309-29.875
50 mg LY2944876-28.405-31.390
Exenatide Extended-release-39.074-40.328
Placebo-1.5880.124

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 12

HbA1c is the glycosylated fraction of hemoglobin A. HbA1c is measured to identify average plasma glucose concentration over prolonged periods of time. (NCT02119819)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercentage of HbA1c (Mean)
10 mg LY2944876-1.07
15 mg LY2944876-1.09
30 mg LY2944876-1.44
50 mg LY2944876-1.33
Exenatide Extended-release-1.42
Placebo-0.29

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of LY2944876

Evaluable pharmacokinetic concentrations from the specified timepoints were combined and utilized in a population approach to determine the population mean estimate and standard deviation at steady-state. (NCT02119819)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24

Interventionnanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean)
10 mg LY2944876607
15 mg LY2944876799
30 mg LY29448761690
50 mg LY29448762570

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Beta-Hydroxy Butyrate Levels

LSM are calculated from MMRM analysis using REML with metformin use, baseline BMI category, baseline HbA1c category, country, treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, baseline parameter result as a covariate, and participant as a random effect. (NCT02119819)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12; Baseline, Week 24

,,,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24
10 mg LY2944876-0.27-0.33
15 mg LY2944876-0.28-0.39
30 mg LY2944876-0.13-0.34
50 mg LY2944876-0.31-0.33
Exenatide Extended-release-0.29-0.19
Placebo-0.23-0.37

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Adiponectin Levels

LSM are calculated from MMRM analysis using REML with metformin use, baseline BMI category, baseline HbA1c category, country, treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, baseline parameter result as a covariate, and participant as a random effect. (NCT02119819)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12; Baseline, Week 24

,,,,,
Interventionµg/L (Least Squares Mean)
Week 12Week 24
10 mg LY29448760.140.03
15 mg LY29448760.030.30
30 mg LY2944876-0.100.28
50 mg LY29448760.120.58
Exenatide Extended-release0.040.14
Placebo0.030.25

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 7-point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Values

SMBG 7-point profiles were measured at morning pre-meal, morning 2 hours post-meal, mid-day pre-meal, mid-day 2 hours post-meal, evening pre-meal, evening 2 hours post-meal, and at bedtime. LSM were calculated from MMRM analysis using REML with metformin use, baseline BMI category, baseline HbA1c category, country, treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects, baseline fasting blood glucose as a covariate, and participant as a random effect. (NCT02119819)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week (Wk) 12; Baseline, Week 24

,,,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Morning pre-meal (Week 12)Morning pre-meal (Week 24)Morning 2 hours post-meal (Week 12)Morning 2 hours post-meal (Week 24)Mid-day pre-meal (Week 12)Mid-day pre-meal (Week 24)Mid-day 2 hours post-meal (Week 12)Mid-day 2 hours post-meal (Week 24)Evening pre-meal (Week 12)Evening pre-meal (Week 24)Evening 2 hours post-meal (Week 12)Evening 2 hours post-meal (Week 24)Bedtime (Week 12)Bedtime (Week 24)
10 mg LY2944876-26.8-23.5-27.9-29.9-17.1-16.3-17.1-12.2-24.1-24.9-25.1-30.2-19.3-28.9
15 mg LY2944876-28.4-29.1-34.2-35.9-19.6-23.4-20.7-26.6-24.8-24.3-26.5-27.9-33.5-25.4
30 mg LY2944876-34.3-29.6-36.0-37.1-26.1-22.4-24.6-21.9-28.5-33.0-33.4-26.0-33.2-32.3
50 mg LY2944876-34.8-34.2-26.4-42.8-24.2-23.5-22.2-33.4-30.1-29.6-32.8-37.2-36.2-38.5
Exenatide Extended-release-38.7-36.8-43.5-42.7-23.5-23.9-27.4-37.2-24.7-36.4-33.5-36.9-41.6-42.9
Placebo-7.4-14.4-1.5-6.3-2.3-4.0-8.9-8.5-1.5-5.74.01.15.6-6.9

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Volume

In the last 5 days of medication administration, subjects did a satiation/nutrient drink test. Participants recorded their sensations every 5 minutes using a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0-5, with level 0 being no symptoms, level 3 corresponding to fullness sensation after a typical meal, and level 5 corresponding to the maximal tolerated volume (maximum or unbearable fullness/satiation). This measure was the volume consumed when the fullness sensation reached level 5. (NCT02160990)
Timeframe: Visit 3, approximately 30 minutes after liquid meal

InterventionmL (Median)
Exenatide1244
Placebo1052

[back to top]

Aggregate Satiation Symptom Score

"Postprandial fullness, nausea, bloating, and pain were measured 30 minutes after the liquid meal using 100 mm horizontal visual analog scales (VAS). The subscale scores could each range from none(0) to worst ever (100) at the left and right ends of the lines for each symptom. These satiation symptom scores (postprandial fullness, nausea, bloating, and pain) were combined to generate a total scale score with a different total scale range (0 - 400 mm) with 0 mm indicating none and 400 indicating worst ever." (NCT02160990)
Timeframe: Visit 3, approximately 30 min after ingestion of nutrient drink test

Interventionmm (Median)
Exenatide145
Placebo172

[back to top]

Satiation Expressed as Volume to Fullness

In the last 5 days of medication administration, subjects did a satiation/nutrient drink test. Participants recorded their sensations every 5 minutes using a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0-5, with level 0 being no symptoms, level 3 corresponding to fullness sensation after a typical meal, and level 5 corresponding to the maximal tolerated volume (maximum or unbearable fullness/satiation). This measure was the volume consumed when the fullness sensation reached level 3. (NCT02160990)
Timeframe: Visit 3, approximately 30 minutes after liquid meal

InterventionmL (Median)
Exenatide705
Placebo675

[back to top]

Gastric Emptying Half-time (T 1/2) of Solids

Gastric emptying of solids half-time is defined as the time for half of the ingested solids to leave the stomach. Subjects were given a scrambled egg breakfast with toast and a glass of milk. The eggs contained a small amount of a radioactive substance. Anterior and posterior gamma camera images were obtain immediately after radiolabeled meal ingestion, every 15 minutes for the first 2 hours, then 30 minutes for the next 2 hours (total 4 hours after the radiolabeled meal). (NCT02160990)
Timeframe: time frame is 30 days after the initiation of dose.

Interventionminutes (Median)
Exenatide187
Placebo86

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight

(NCT02160990)
Timeframe: baseline, day 30

Interventionkg (Median)
Exenatide-0.95
Placebo-0.55

[back to top]

Buffet Meal Intake (kcal)

"Five hours after the standard egg meal ingested to measure gastric emptying, subjects were invited to eat, over a 30 minute period, a standard all you can eat meal. This meal consisted of either meat or vegetable lasagna, vanilla pudding, and skim milk. Personnel from the study team weighed the food servings post-meal and reported the amount of food left from single portions partially consumed. The total kcal of the food consumed was analyzed by using validated software." (NCT02160990)
Timeframe: "Visit 4, approximately 30 minutes after start of all you can eat meal"

Interventionkcal (Median)
Exenatide977
Placebo1110

[back to top]

Percentage of Gastric Contents Emptied at 1 Hour

Subjects were given a scrambled egg breakfast with toast and a glass of milk. The eggs contained a small amount of a radioactive substance. At the completion of the meal, subjects stood in front of a special camera and pictures were taken at specific intervals. This outcome measure is the proportion of the radiolabeled meal emptied at 1 hour. (NCT02160990)
Timeframe: Visit 4, approximately 1 hours after radiolabeled meal was ingested

Interventionpercentage of meal emptied (Median)
Exenatide12.4
Placebo38.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving HbA1c <7.0% at Week 28, No Weight Gain at Week 28, and No Major Hypoglycemia Over 28 Weeks

To compare the percentage of participants achieving HbA1c <7.0% at Week 28, no weight gain at Week 28, and no major hypoglycemia over 28 weeks between EQW added to titrated basal insulin glargine to placebo added to titrated basal insulin glargine, with or without metformin. (NCT02229383)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 28

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Exenatide22.2
Placebo2.2

[back to top]

Change in Seated Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 28

To compare the change from baseline in seated systolic blood pressure achieved with EQW added to titrated basal insulin glargine to placebo added to titrated basal insulin glargine, with or without metformin, after 28 weeks of double-blind treatment. (NCT02229383)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 28

Interventionmillimeter of mercury (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide-2.5
Placebo-0.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving HbA1c <7.0% at Week 28

To compare the percentage of participants achieving HbA1c <7.0% between EQW added to titrated basal insulin glargine to placebo added to titrated basal insulin glargine, with or without metformin, after 28 weeks of double-blind treatment. (NCT02229383)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 28

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Exenatide32.6
Placebo7.0

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 28

To compare the change from baseline in HbA1c achieved with exenatide once weekly (EQW) added to titrated basal insulin glargine to placebo added to titrated basal insulin glargine, with or without metformin, after 28 weeks of double-blind treatment. SU= sulfonylurea. (NCT02229383)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 28

InterventionPercentage of HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide-0.96
Placebo-0.22

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 28

To compare the change from baseline in body weight achieved with EQW added to titrated basal insulin glargine to placebo added to titrated basal insulin glargine, with or without metformin, after 28 weeks of double-blind treatment. (NCT02229383)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 28

Interventionkilogram (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide-1.04
Placebo0.48

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 28 in Daily Insulin Dose

To compare the change from baseline in daily insulin dose achieved with EQW added to titrated basal insulin glargine to placebo added to titrated basal insulin glargine, with or without metformin, after 28 weeks of double-blind treatment. (NCT02229383)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 28

InterventionUnits (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide1.6
Placebo3.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 28 in 2-hour Postprandial Glucose After a Standard Meal Tolerance Test (MTT)

To compare the change from baseline in 2-hour postprandial glucose after a standard MTT achieved with EQW added to titrated basal insulin glargine to placebo added to titrated basal insulin glargine, with or without metformin, after 28 weeks of double-blind treatment. (NCT02229383)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 28

Interventionmilligram per deciliter (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide-28.73
Placebo-0.96

[back to top]

L-FABP

Mean change in urine L-type fatty acid binding protein:Cr ratio (NCT02251431)
Timeframe: 38 weeks

,
Interventionng/mmol Creat (Mean)
BaselineEnd of study (38th week)
Exenatide-extended Release2.612.05
Placebo3.243

[back to top]

ST2

Mean change in plasma ST2 (pg/ml) (NCT02251431)
Timeframe: 38 weeks

,
Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
BaselineEnd of study (38th week)
Exenatide-extended Release635.2524.68
Placebo443.18534.53

[back to top]

NGAL

Mean change in urine neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin (NGAL):creatinine (Cr) ratio (NCT02251431)
Timeframe: 38 weeks

,
Interventionng/mmol Creat (Mean)
BaselineEnd of study (38th week)
Exenatide-extended Release17.3514.01
Placebo18.4424.39

[back to top]

Cystatin-C

Mean paired change in urine cystatin-C:Cr ratio (uCysC:Cr) (NCT02251431)
Timeframe: 38 weeks

,
Interventionng/mmol Creat (Mean)
BaselineEnd of study (38th week)
Exenatide-extended Release2.071.47
Placebo1.841.57

[back to top]

Pi GST

Mean change in pi glutathione S-transferase (piGST):Cr ratio (NCT02251431)
Timeframe: 38 weeks

,
Interventionng/mmol Creat (Mean)
BaselineEnd of study (38th week)
Exenatide-extended Release2.23.03
Placebo3.994.27

[back to top]

Troponin I

Mean change in plasma ultrasensitive troponin I (pg/ml) (NCT02251431)
Timeframe: 38 weeks

,
Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
BaselineEnd of study (38th week)
Exenatide-extended Release230.85238.53
Placebo415.65504.48

[back to top]

ACR

Mean change in urine albumin:Cr ratio (ACR) (NCT02251431)
Timeframe: 38 weeks

,
Interventionng/mmol Creat (Mean)
BaselineEnd of study (38th week)
Exenatide-extended Release6678.233963.49
Placebo9713.659825.2

[back to top]

Alpha GST

Mean change in urine alpha glutathione S-transferase (αGST):Cr ratio (NCT02251431)
Timeframe: 38 weeks

,
Interventionng/mmol Creat (Mean)
BaselineEnd of study (38th week)
Exenatide-extended Release0.060.05
Placebo0.670.27

[back to top]

BNP

Mean change in plasma B-type natriuretic peptide BNP (pg/ml) (NCT02251431)
Timeframe: 38 weeks

,
Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
BaselineEnd of study (38th week)
Exenatide-extended Release4.875.59
Placebo9.8814.02

[back to top]

NAG

Mean change in urine N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG):Cr ratio (NCT02251431)
Timeframe: 38 weeks

,
Interventionng/mmol Creat (Mean)
BaselineEnd of study (38th week)
Exenatide-extended Release17.3514.01
Placebo18.4424.39

[back to top]

Galectin-3

Mean change in plasma galectin-3 (pg/ml) (NCT02251431)
Timeframe: 38 weeks

,
Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
BaselineEnd of study (38th week)
Exenatide-extended Release9570.919539.21
Placebo9266.78098.78

[back to top]

IL-18

Mean change in urine interleukin-18:Cr ratio (NCT02251431)
Timeframe: 38 weeks

,
Interventionpg/mmol Creat (Mean)
BaselineEnd of study (38th week)
Exenatide-extended Release1.681.96
Placebo3.482.68

[back to top]

KIM-1

Mean change in urine kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1):Cr ratio (NCT02251431)
Timeframe: 38 weeks

,
Interventionng/mmol Creat (Mean)
BaselineEnd of study (38th week)
Exenatide-extended Release0.10.13
Placebo0.130.1

[back to top]

Average of Change in 24-hour Mean Weighted Glucose From Baseline to Week 4 and Baseline to Week 10

(NCT02288273)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 10

,
Intervention% times patients had specific CGM/24-hr (Least Squares Mean)
Change in times(%): PG<70 baseline to Week 4Change in times (%): PG <70 baseline to Week 10Change in %: 70 Change in %: 70 Change in times (%): PG >180 baseline to Week 4Change in times (%): PG >180 baseline to Week 10
EQW + Met0.50.515.821.4-16.2-22.0
Placebo + Met0.20.14.11.3-4.3-1.4

[back to top]

Change in 24-hour Mean Weighted Glucose Between Day 1 of Week 10 (Day 64/65) and Day 6 of Week 10 (Day 69/70) Within Each EQW-treated Patient

(NCT02288273)
Timeframe: Day 64/65

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
EQW + Met5.2
Placebo + Met-6.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Day1) to Day 70 and Day 22 in FPG

(NCT02288273)
Timeframe: Day 22/Day70

,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline to Day 22Baseline to Day 70
EQW + Met-29.6-41.9
Placebo + Met-1.9-5.0

[back to top]

Average of Change in 24-hour Mean Weighted Glucose From Baseline to Week 4 and Baseline to Week 10

(NCT02288273)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 10

,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Change in mean weighted glucose baseline to Week 4Change in mean weighted glucose baseline - Week 10Change in MAGE (mg/dL) from baseline to Week 4Change in MAGE (mg/dL) from baseline to Week 10
EQW + Met-4.5-6.3-8.2-15.2
Placebo + Met-1.80.7-3.82.9

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Day 22 and Baseline to Day 70

(NCT02288273)
Timeframe: Day 22 and Day 70

,
Intervention% Alc (Least Squares Mean)
Change from baseline to Day 22Change from baseline to Day 70
EQW + Met-0.30-0.92
Placebo + Met-0.10-0.20

[back to top]

Change in 24-hour Mean Weighted Glucose

Change in 24-hour mean weighted glucose from baseline (Day -1/1) to Day 6 of Week 4 (Day 27/28) and to Day 6 of Week 10 (Day 69/70). (NCT02288273)
Timeframe: Day 27/28

,
Intervention(mg/dL) (Mean)
Baseline (Day -1/1)Day 27/28Change from Baseline to Day 27/28Change from Baseline to Day 69/70
EQW + Met185.7158.3-26.0-30.8
Placebo + Met183.8176.9-5.3-3.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 64 and Day 22 in 2- Hour Mean Weighted PPG (After the Breakfast Meal)

(NCT02288273)
Timeframe: Day 22 and Day 64

,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline to Day 22Baseline to Day 64
EQW + Met-32.1-44.4
Placebo + Met-2.0-6.0

[back to top]

Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Composite T-score

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) measures cognition relevant to schizophrenia and related disorders. The MCCB consists of ten individually administered tests that measure cognitive performance in seven domains including speed of processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The raw scores from the ten tests are entered in the MCCB Computer Scoring Program software, which provides an age and gender-corrected T-score and percentile on the seven cognitive domains. A T-score of 50 +/- 10 represents a normative mean performance in each test. Accordingly, the criterion for assignment to cognitively normal-range group require an overall composite T-score from 40 to 60. These data points from baseline visit to week 24 will measure changes in cognition in addition overall cognitive ability compared to healthy individuals. (NCT02417142)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18, and Week 24.

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 6Week 12Week 18Week 24
Experimental26.927.328.428.731.2
Placebo24.727.228.132.233.9

[back to top]

Negative Symptoms as Measured by the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Score

SANS measures negative symptoms on a 25-item, six point scale each (0-5; none-severe). Items are listed under five domains including affective flattening or blunting, alogia, avolition/apathy, anhedonia/asociality, and attention. The total possible score ranges from 0 to 125. (NCT02417142)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, Week 18 and Week 24

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 6Week 12Week 18Week 24
Experimental33.134.135.836.135.2
Placebo34.132.834.535.235.0

[back to top]

Number of Hospital Readmissions

Number of hospital readmissions during 12 weeks after discharge will be recorded (NCT02455076)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after discharge

Interventionnumber of readmissions (Number)
Exenatide Outpatient12
Insulin Only Outpatient14

[back to top]

Number of Acute Kidney Injury Events

Number of Acute Kidney Injury events will be recorded (NCT02455076)
Timeframe: 12 weeks from discharge.

Interventionnumber of events (Number)
Exenatide Outpatient1
Insulin Only Outpatient1

[back to top]

Mean Premeal Blood Glucose Levels Inpatient

The blood glucose levels prior to each meal will using a glucose meter. (NCT02455076)
Timeframe: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 10 days

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Exenatide178.7
Exenatide Plus Glargine Insulin153.4
Basal Bolus Regimen161.8

[back to top]

Mean Fasting Blood Glucose Levels Inpatient

The blood glucose levels prior to the patient's first meal of the day will be assessed using a glucose meter. (NCT02455076)
Timeframe: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 10 days.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Exenatide177.1
Exenatide Plus Glargine Insulin146.8
Basal Bolus Regimen157.7

[back to top]

Mean Daily Blood Glucose Concentration Inpatient

The levels of blood glucose (BG) will be measured before each meal and at bedtime using a glucose meter. Blood glucose will be measured at baseline and during the hospital stay (up to 10 days). (NCT02455076)
Timeframe: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 10 days.

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Exenatide177.1
Exenatide Plus Glargine Insulin154.1
Basal Bolus Regimen166.1

[back to top]

Mean Fasting Blood Glucose Levels During Outpatient Period

Fasting Blood Glucose Levels were measured using blood test (NCT02455076)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after discharge

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Exenatide Outpatient146.5
Insulin Only Outpatient133.2

[back to top]

Mean Daily Blood Glucose Concentration During Outpatient Period

Mean Daily Blood Glucose Concentration will be calculated and recorded. (NCT02455076)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after discharge

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Exenatide Outpatient155.1
Insulin Only Outpatient144.7

[back to top]

Incidence of the Need for ICU Care Inpatient

The total number of patients who require transfer to the ICU will be recorded. (NCT02455076)
Timeframe: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 10 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Exenatide2
Exenatide Plus Glargine Insulin3
Basal Bolus Regimen0

[back to top]

Incidence of Hypoglycemic Events Inpatient

The number of patients with hypoglycemia (blood glucose levels < 70 mg/dL) will be recorded. (NCT02455076)
Timeframe: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 10 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Exenatide0
Exenatide Plus Glargine Insulin3
Basal Bolus Regimen6

[back to top]

Incidence of Hyperglycemic Events Inpatient

Percent of readings with hyperglycemia (blood glucose levels > 240 mg/dL) (NCT02455076)
Timeframe: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 10 days

Interventionpercentage of readings (Mean)
Exenatide10.4
Exenatide Plus Glargine Insulin5.1
Basal Bolus Regimen11.2

[back to top]

Incidence of Hospital Readmissions

The number of patients who require readmission to the hospital from the time of discharge to 12 weeks after discharge will be recorded. (NCT02455076)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after discharge

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Exenatide4
Exenatide Plus Glargine Insulin16
Basal Bolus Regimen6

[back to top]

Total Daily Dose of Insulin Inpatient

The total daily dose of insulin needed for glycemic control from baseline through the patient's hospital stay will be recorded. (NCT02455076)
Timeframe: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 10 days

Interventionunits/day (Mean)
Exenatide8.1
Exenatide Plus Glargine Insulin17.7
Basal Bolus Regimen28

[back to top]

Number of Severe Gastrointestinal Adverse Events

Number of Severe (require hospitalization) Gastrointestinal Adverse Events (NCT02455076)
Timeframe: 12 weeks from discharge.

Interventionnumber of events (Number)
Exenatide Outpatient1
Insulin Only Outpatient1

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Severe Hypoglycemic Events Inpatient

Occurrences of hypoglycemia (blood glucose levels < 40 mg/dL) will be recorded. (NCT02455076)
Timeframe: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 10 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Exenatide0
Exenatide Plus Glargine Insulin0
Basal Bolus Regimen0

[back to top]

Incidence of Gastrointestinal Adverse Events Inpatient

The number of subjects who experience gastrointestinal side effects including nausea, vomiting and diarrhea will be recorded. (NCT02455076)
Timeframe: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 10 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Exenatide5
Exenatide Plus Glargine Insulin5
Basal Bolus Regimen1

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Severe Hypoglycemic Events

Occurrences of hypoglycemia (blood glucose levels < 40 mg/dL) will be detected by blood test (NCT02455076)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after discharge

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Exenatide Outpatient1
Insulin Only Outpatient4

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Had Emergency Room Visits

The number of patients who had emergency room visits from the time of discharge to 12 weeks after discharge will be recorded. (NCT02455076)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after discharge

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Exenatide Outpatient4
Insulin Only Outpatient12

[back to top]

The Number of Patients With Hypoglycemia Outpatient

Occurrence of hypoglycemia (blood glucose levels < 70 mg) will be identified by blood test (NCT02455076)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after discharge

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Exenatide Outpatient7
Insulin Only Outpatient7

[back to top]

Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury Inpatient

The number of patients who experience acute kidney injury diagnosed by an increment in serum creatinine >0.5 mg/dL from admission value or 50% of baseline value will be recorded. (NCT02455076)
Timeframe: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 10 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Exenatide3
Exenatide Plus Glargine Insulin6
Basal Bolus Regimen3

[back to top]

Hospital Mortality

The total number of subject deaths during hospital stay will be recorded. (NCT02455076)
Timeframe: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 10 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Exenatide0
Exenatide Plus Glargine Insulin0
Basal Bolus Regimen0

[back to top]

Efficacy, Measured by HbA1c Levels and no Weight Gain

Number of patients who have an HbA1c <7.0% and no weight gain at 12 weeks from discharge will be recorded. (NCT02455076)
Timeframe: 12 weeks from discharge.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Exenatide Outpatient8
Insulin Only Outpatient5

[back to top]

Efficacy, Measured by HbA1c Levels and no Hypoglycemia

Number of patients who have an HbA1c <7.0% and no hypoglycemia at 12 weeks from discharge will be recorded. (NCT02455076)
Timeframe: 12 weeks from discharge.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Exenatide Outpatient11
Insulin Only Outpatient8

[back to top]

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure from the time of discharge to 12 weeks after discharge will be recorded (NCT02455076)
Timeframe: Discharge (after day 10 or hospital stay), 12 weeks after discharge

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Exenatide Outpatient3.2
Insulin Only Outpatient1.8

[back to top]

Change in Heart Rate

Change in heart rate from the time of discharge to 12 weeks after discharge will be recorded (NCT02455076)
Timeframe: Discharge (after day 10 or hospital stay), 12 weeks after discharge

Interventionheart beats/min (Mean)
Exenatide Outpatient-3.1
Insulin Only Outpatient0.2

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c Concentration Inpatient

The difference in the levels of HbA1c at discharge and at 12 weeks from discharge will be measured. The A1C test result is reported as a percentage. The higher the percentage, the higher a person's blood glucose levels have been. A normal A1C level is below 5.7 percent. (NCT02455076)
Timeframe: 12 weeks from discharge.

Interventionpercentage of HbA1c (Mean)
Exenatide-1.3
Exenatide Plus Glargine Insulin-1.1
Basal Bolus Regimen-1.4

[back to top]

Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure

Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure from the time of discharge to 12 weeks after discharge will be recorded (NCT02455076)
Timeframe: Discharge (after day 10 or hospital stay), 12 weeks after discharge

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Exenatide Outpatient4.2
Insulin Only Outpatient-1.0

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight

The change in Body Weight from discharge to 12 weeks after discharge will be recorded (NCT02455076)
Timeframe: Time of discharge, 12 weeks after discharge

Interventionpounds (Mean)
Exenatide Outpatient-2.3
Insulin Only Outpatient-1.2

[back to top]

Change in Body Mass Index

The change in BMI from discharge to 12 weeks after discharge will be calculated (NCT02455076)
Timeframe: Discharge (after day 10 or hospital stay), 12 weeks after discharge 12 weeks after discharge

Interventionkg/m2 (Mean)
Exenatide Outpatient-0.8
Insulin Only Outpatient-0.7

[back to top]

Average Number of Days of Hospital Stay

The average number of days in the hospital for subjects will be calculated. (NCT02455076)
Timeframe: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 10 days

Interventiondays (Median)
Exenatide4
Exenatide Plus Glargine Insulin5
Basal Bolus Regimen4

[back to top]

Hospital Complications

The total number of subjects who experience hospital complications like nosocomial pneumonia, bacteremia, respiratory failure, acute renal failure, and wound infections (surgery patients) will be recorded. Nosocomial infections will be diagnosed based on standardized Centers for Disease Control (CDC) criteria. (NCT02455076)
Timeframe: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 10 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Exenatide4
Exenatide Plus Glargine Insulin6
Basal Bolus Regimen3

[back to top]

Body Mass Index

Percentage of body mass index change from Randomization to Week 52 (NCT02496611)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

Interventionpercentage (body mass index) (Mean)
Weight Loss Maintenance Without Pharmacotherapy10.1
Weight Loss Maintenance With Pharmacotherapy4.6

[back to top]

Change in Vital Sign

Change in vital sign at 12 and 24 weeks from start of the treatment(24 weeks just for patients allocated in long-term treatment) (NCT02533453)
Timeframe: baseline and 12/24 weeks

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
SBPDBP
12/24 Weeks Treatment-3.35-0.15

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c

Change in HbA1c at 12 and 24 weeks from start of the treatment(24 weeks just for patients allocated in long-term treatment) (NCT02533453)
Timeframe: baseline and 12/24 weeks

Interventionpercentage of Hba1c (Mean)
12/24 Weeks Treatment-1.21

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Plasma Gloucose

Change in Fasting plasma gloucose at 12 and 24 weeks from start of the treatment(24 weeks just for patients allocated in long-term treatment) (NCT02533453)
Timeframe: baseline and 12/24 weeks

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
12/24 Weeks Treatment-34.2

[back to top]

Change in Body Weight

Change in body weight at 12 and 24 weeks from start of the treatment(24 weeks just for patients allocated in long-term treatment) (NCT02533453)
Timeframe: baseline and 12/24 weeks

Interventionkg (Mean)
12/24 Weeks Treatment-0.95

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events(AEs) and Serious Adverse Event(SAEs)

was to estimate the incidence rates of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) in patients who are treated with 2 mg exenatide once weekly for type 2 diabetes mellitus in the normal clinical practice setting over a period of 12/24 weeks for long-term surveillance. (NCT02533453)
Timeframe: baseline and 12/24 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
rate of all AEsrate of all SAEs
12/24 Weeks Treatment52.93.8

[back to top]

"Evaluation of Subjective Improvement of Main Indication"

"Subjective improvement of main indication will be assessed as improved, slightly improved, unchanged, aggravated, or unable to evaluate." (NCT02533453)
Timeframe: baseline and 12/24 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
ImprovedSlightly improvedUnchangedAggravatedunable to evaluate
12/24 Weeks Treatment8411611

[back to top]

Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)

Treatment effect on SBP after 24 weeks of treatment (NCT02635386)
Timeframe: 24 weeks treatment

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly (EQW )123.6
Dapagliflozin (DAPA)123
EQW Plus DAPA122
Dapagliflozin Plus Glucophage (MET ER)128
Phentermine /Topiramate (PHEN/ TPM) ER124

[back to top]

Total Body Fat (%) by DEXA

Treatment impact on percent total body fat by DEXA (NCT02635386)
Timeframe: 24 weeks of treatment

Interventionpercent fat mass (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly (EQW )46.1
Dapagliflozin (DAPA)46.4
EQW Plus DAPA45.8
Dapagliflozin Plus Glucophage (MET ER)46.1
Phentermine /Topiramate (PHEN/ TPM) ER45.2

[back to top]

Total Cholesterol Levels

Treatment effect on blood concentrations of total cholesterol (NCT02635386)
Timeframe: 24 weeks of treatment

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly (EQW )189
Dapagliflozin (DAPA)186
EQW Plus DAPA185
Dapagliflozin Plus Glucophage (MET ER)192
Phentermine /Topiramate (PHEN/ TPM) ER178

[back to top]

Total Fat Mass (kg) Evaluated by DEXA

Treatment impact on total fat mass by DEXA (NCT02635386)
Timeframe: 24 weeks of treatment

Interventionkilogram (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly (EQW )47.6
Dapagliflozin (DAPA)47.8
EQW Plus DAPA45.9
Dapagliflozin Plus Glucophage (MET ER)48
Phentermine /Topiramate (PHEN/ TPM) ER44.5

[back to top]

Total Testosterone Concentrations

Treatment effect on blood concentrations of total testosterone (NCT02635386)
Timeframe: 24 weeks of treatment

Interventionng/dL (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly (EQW )38.8
Dapagliflozin (DAPA)35
EQW Plus DAPA42.6
Dapagliflozin Plus Glucophage (MET ER)39.5
Phentermine /Topiramate (PHEN/ TPM) ER45.5

[back to top]

Triglyceride (TRG) Levels

Treatment effect on blood concentrations of triglycerides (NCT02635386)
Timeframe: 24 weeks of treatment

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly (EQW )130
Dapagliflozin (DAPA)132
EQW Plus DAPA112
Dapagliflozin Plus Glucophage (MET ER)105
Phentermine /Topiramate (PHEN/ TPM) ER110

[back to top]

Trunk/Leg Fat Ratio by DEXA

Treatment impact on trunk/limb ratio (measure of central adiposity) by DEXA (NCT02635386)
Timeframe: 24 weeks of treatment

Interventionratio (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly (EQW )1.03
Dapagliflozin (DAPA).95
EQW Plus DAPA.93
Dapagliflozin Plus Glucophage (MET ER).98
Phentermine /Topiramate (PHEN/ TPM) ER.99

[back to top]

Waist-to-Height Ratio (WHtR)

Treatment impact on WHtR which is a measure of central adiposity (NCT02635386)
Timeframe: 24 weeks of treatment

Interventionratio (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly (EQW ).64
Dapagliflozin (DAPA).61
EQW Plus DAPA.65
Dapagliflozin Plus Glucophage (MET ER).61
Phentermine /Topiramate (PHEN/ TPM) ER.59

[back to top]

Waist-to-Hip Ratio (WHR)

Treatment impact on central adiposity after 24 weeks (NCT02635386)
Timeframe: 24 weeks of treatment

Interventionratio (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly (EQW ).83
Dapagliflozin (DAPA).79
EQW Plus DAPA.86
Dapagliflozin Plus Glucophage (MET ER).83
Phentermine /Topiramate (PHEN/ TPM) ER.81

[back to top]

Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate (DHEA-S) Levels

Treatment effect on blood concentrations of DHEA-S (NCT02635386)
Timeframe: 24 weeks of treatment

Interventionmcg/dL (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly (EQW )165
Dapagliflozin (DAPA)187
EQW Plus DAPA169
Dapagliflozin Plus Glucophage (MET ER)189
Phentermine /Topiramate (PHEN/ TPM) ER201

[back to top]

Absolute Body Weight

Treatment effect on body weight at 24 weeks of treatment (NCT02635386)
Timeframe: 24 weeks of treatment

Interventionkilogram (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly (EQW )100.4
Dapagliflozin (DAPA)102.6
EQW Plus DAPA99
Dapagliflozin Plus Glucophage (MET ER)101.2
Phentermine /Topiramate (PHEN/ TPM) ER97

[back to top]

Android-Gynoid Ratio (AGR) as Determined by DEXA

treatment impact on measure of central adiposity as determined by android/gynoid ratio (NCT02635386)
Timeframe: 24 weeks of treatment

Interventionratio (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly (EQW )1.07
Dapagliflozin (DAPA)1.02
EQW Plus DAPA1.04
Dapagliflozin Plus Glucophage (MET ER)1.04
Phentermine /Topiramate (PHEN/ TPM) ER1.03

[back to top]

Body Mass Index (BMI)

Treatment efficacy in reducing body mass at 24 weeks of treatment (NCT02635386)
Timeframe: 24 weeks of treatment

Interventionkilogram/meter squared (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly (EQW )37.3
Dapagliflozin (DAPA)37.4
EQW Plus DAPA36.7
Dapagliflozin Plus Glucophage (MET ER)37
Phentermine /Topiramate (PHEN/ TPM) ER35.3

[back to top]

Central Adiposity (Waist Circumference)

Treatment effect on loss of central adiposity after 24 weeks (NCT02635386)
Timeframe: 24 weeks of treatment

Interventioncentimeters (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly (EQW )104
Dapagliflozin (DAPA)101
EQW Plus DAPA106
Dapagliflozin Plus Glucophage (MET ER)101.3
Phentermine /Topiramate (PHEN/ TPM) ER97

[back to top]

Change in Percent Body Weight

Treatment effect on change in percent body weight from baseline (NCT02635386)
Timeframe: Change from baseline (time 0) to study end (24 weeks)

Interventionpercentage change in body weight (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly (EQW )3.8
Dapagliflozin (DAPA)1.5
EQW Plus DAPA6.9
Dapagliflozin Plus Glucophage (MET ER)1.7
Phentermine /Topiramate (PHEN/ TPM) ER8.1

[back to top]

Corrected First Phase Insulin Secretion (IGI/HOMA-IR)

Treatment effect on insulin secretion from 0 to 30 minutes after glucose load corrected for by fasting insulin sensitivity. A higher score shows improved first phase insulin secretion in response to glucose (NCT02635386)
Timeframe: 24 weeks of treatment

Interventionindex score (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly (EQW )1.03
Dapagliflozin (DAPA)0.6
EQW Plus DAPA0.91
Dapagliflozin Plus Glucophage (MET ER)0.7
Phentermine /Topiramate (PHEN/ TPM) ER1.1

[back to top]

Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)

Treatment effect on DBP after 24 weeks (NCT02635386)
Timeframe: 24 weeks of treatment

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly (EQW )81
Dapagliflozin (DAPA)79.8
EQW Plus DAPA76
Dapagliflozin Plus Glucophage (MET ER)82
Phentermine /Topiramate (PHEN/ TPM) ER83.6

[back to top]

Fasting Blood Glucose

Treatment impact on fasting concentration of glucose in the blood (NCT02635386)
Timeframe: 24 weeks of treatment

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly (EQW )91
Dapagliflozin (DAPA)93
EQW Plus DAPA86.5
Dapagliflozin Plus Glucophage (MET ER)89
Phentermine /Topiramate (PHEN/ TPM ER91.4

[back to top]

Fasting Insulin Sensitivity (HOMA-IR)

Treatment effect on the ratio HOMA-IR which is insulin resistance measure derived from fasting blood glucose and insulin and is calculated by insulin (mU/ml)*glucose (mmol/L)/22,5. The higher thenumber the more insulin resistant. (NCT02635386)
Timeframe: 24 weeks of treatment

Interventionindex score (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly (EQW )3.7
Dapagliflozin (DAPA)3.6
EQW Plus DAPA2.6
Dapagliflozin Plus Glucophage (MET ER)3.3
Phentermine /Topiramate (PHEN/ TPM) ER3.4

[back to top]

Free Androgen Index (FAI)

Treatment effect on FAI calculated from total testosterone divided by sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) levels. A higher score indicates a worse outcome. (NCT02635386)
Timeframe: 24 weeks of treatment

Interventionindex score (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly (EQW )5.3
Dapagliflozin (DAPA)4.7
EQW Plus DAPA5.2
Dapagliflozin Plus Glucophage (MET ER)5.7
Phentermine /Topiramate (PHEN/ TPM) ER5

[back to top]

Matsuda Sensitivity Index Derived From the OGTT(SI OGTT)

The SI IOGTT is a measure of peripheral insulin sensitivity derived from the values of Insulin (microunits per milliliter) and Glucose (milligrams per deciliter) obtained from the OGTT and the corresponding fasting values. SI (OGTT) = 10,000/ [(G fasting x I fasting) x (G OGTTmean x I OGTTmean)], where fasting glucose and insulin data are taken from time 0 of the OGTT and mean data represent the average glucose and insulin values obtained during the entire OGTT. The square root is used to correct for nonlinear distribution of insulin, and 10,000 is a scaling factor in the equation. The higher value, the more sensitive to insulin. (NCT02635386)
Timeframe: 24 weeks of treatment

Interventionindex score (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly (EQW )3.1
Dapagliflozin (DAPA)3.6
EQW Plus DAPA3.9
Dapagliflozin Plus Glucophage (MET ER)4.8
Phentermine /Topiramate (PHEN/ TPM) ER4.7

[back to top]

OGTT Mean Blood Glucose (MBG)

Treatment effect on MBG measured during the oral glucose tolerance test (NCT02635386)
Timeframe: 24 weeks of treatment

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly (EQW )118
Dapagliflozin (DAPA)126.4
EQW Plus DAPA112
Dapagliflozin Plus Glucophage (MET ER)119
Phentermine /Topiramate (PHEN/ TPM ER113

[back to top]

Oral Disposition (Insulin Sensitivity-insulin Secretion) Index

An estimation of β-cell compensatory function, the insulin secretion-sensitivity index (IS-SI) will be derived by applying the concept of the oral disposition index to measurements obtained during the 2-h OGTT and calculated as the index of insulin secretion factored by insulin sensitivity (ΔINS/ΔPG 30 x Matsuda SIOGTT) from the OGTT. A higher score shows improved pancreatic insulin responsiveness relative to resistance. (NCT02635386)
Timeframe: 24 weeks of treatment

Interventionindex score (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly (EQW )471
Dapagliflozin (DAPA)311
EQW Plus DAPA503
Dapagliflozin Plus Glucophage (MET ER)395
Phentermine /Topiramate (PHEN/ TPM) ER545

[back to top]

Changes of Energy Intake Assessed by Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recall (ASA24-Kids)

Self-reported daily energy intake was assessed by Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recall (ASA24-Kids, http://appliedresearch.cancer.gov/tools/instruments/asa24/), a web-based diet assessment tool that allows 24-hour diet recall using branded food items. (NCT02664441)
Timeframe: Baseline and 36 weeks

Interventionkcals (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly Extended-release-62
Matching Placebo-210

[back to top]

Changes in HDL Cholesterol and Triglycerides Assessed by Fasting Lipids

Change in fasting HDL cholesterol and triglycerides between baseline and the end of the 36-week randomized drug treatment phase. (NCT02664441)
Timeframe: From baseline to 36 weeks

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
HDL CholesterolTriglycerides
Exenatide Once Weekly Extended-release0.7-0.6
Matching Placebo0.64.2

[back to top]

Changes in Fat and Total Calorie Intake Assessed by Free Buffet Meal Analysis.

"Changes in fat and total calorie intake during free buffet meals assessed at baseline and after 36-weeks of study drug treatment.~The buffet meal is an objective measure of satiety as it assesses food intake and choice after a caloric preload. A standardized test meal preload provided 20% of estimated daily caloric requirements,based on the Schofield-HW equation. The purpose of the test meal is to ensure that study participants are in an equally fed state. Ninety minutes later, an ad libitum buffet meal was served consisting of a wide variety of food items and more than the child's estimated daily calorie requirements will be offered (5,000 kcal). Children had access to the buffet for 30 min, after which calorie intake and composition of consumed foods was measured by weighing back uneaten food." (NCT02664441)
Timeframe: From baseline to 36 weeks

,
Interventiongrams (Mean)
Fat IntakeTotal Calorie Intake
Exenatide Once Weekly Extended-release-9.5-287
Matching Placebo14.5224

[back to top]

Percent Change of Body Mass Index (BMI) as Calculated by the Formula: Body Weight in kg Divided by Height in Meters².

Percent change of body mass index (BMI), as calculated by the formula: body weight in kg divided by height in meters², between baseline and the end of the 36-week randomized drug treatment phase. (NCT02664441)
Timeframe: From baseline to 36 weeks

Interventionpercent change from baseline (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly Extended-release1.7
Matching Placebo3.5

[back to top]

Changes of Insulin Resistance Assessed by Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)

Changes of insulin resistance estimated by the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) using the formula HOMA-IR = insulin [mU/l] x glucose [mmol/l]) / 22.5 where both insulin and glucose values are obtained from a fasting blood sample. (NCT02664441)
Timeframe: From baseline to 36 weeks

InterventionHOMA-IR score (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly Extended-release3.5
Matching Placebo2.2

[back to top]

Changes of Energy Expenditure Assessed by Doubly Labeled Water Analysis

Total energy expenditure in the free-living environment was measured using doubly labeled water which estimates carbon dioxide production by measuring the elimination of the tracers deuterium (²H) and oxygen-18 (¹⁸O) from the body. These measures are used to determine the average daily rate of carbon dioxide production which is then used to calculate total energy expenditure using an equation from Weir and an assumed food quotient (0.85). (NCT02664441)
Timeframe: Baseline and 36 weeks

Interventionkcals/day (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly Extended-release-17.8
Matching Placebo146.3

[back to top]

Changes of Circulating Leptin Levels

Change in circulating leptin between baseline and the end of the 36-week randomized drug treatment phase. (NCT02664441)
Timeframe: From baseline to 36 weeks

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly Extended-release1.4
Matching Placebo11.8

[back to top]

Changes in Inflammation Assessed by C-reactive Protein (CRP)

Change in C-reactive protein (CRP) between baseline and the end of the 36-week randomized drug treatment phase. (NCT02664441)
Timeframe: From baseline to 36 weeks

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly Extended-release0.00
Matching Placebo0.18

[back to top]

Changes in Glucose 120 Minutes Following an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test

Change in blood glucose measures 120 minutes post-glucose bolus during an oral glucose tolerance test between baseline and the end of the 36-week randomized drug treatment phase. (NCT02664441)
Timeframe: From baseline to 36 weeks

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly Extended-release-12.4
Matching Placebo-3.4

[back to top]

Changes in Fasting Glucose

Change in fasting blood glucose between baseline and the end of the 36-week randomized drug treatment phase. (NCT02664441)
Timeframe: From baseline to 36 weeks

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly Extended-release7.4
Matching Placebo3.7

[back to top]

Changes in Body Composition as Assessed by Body Fat Mass Using Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA)

Body composition change between baseline and the end of the 36-week randomized drug treatment phase assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and expressed as the change in adipose tissue mass. (NCT02664441)
Timeframe: At baseline and 36 weeks

Interventionkilograms (Mean)
Exenatide Once Weekly Extended-release1.5
Matching Placebo4.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7 % or <=6.5% at Week 52: Single Arm Extension Period

Participants without any available HbA1c assessment at Week 52 were considered as non-responders. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: Week 52

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
HbA1c <7%HbA1c <=6.5%
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)64.142.7

[back to top]

Number of Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia Events Per Participant-Year: Single Arm Extension Period

Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of <=3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL). Hypoglycemic episodes with plasma glucose of <3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) were also analyzed. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 52

Interventionevents per participant-year (Number)
Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia(<=3.9 mmol/L)Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia (<3.0 mmol/L)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)1.590.24

[back to top]

Number of Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia Events Per Participant-Year: Core Period

Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of <=3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL). Hypoglycemic episodes with plasma glucose of <3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) were also analyzed. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 26

,
Interventionevents per participant-year (Number)
Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia(<=3.9 mmol/L)Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia (<3.0 mmol/L)
GLP-1 Receptor Agonist0.080.01
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)1.540.25

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Requiring Rescue Therapy During the 52 Week Treatment Period: Single Arm Extension Period

Routine HbA1c value was used to determine the requirement of rescue medication. Threshold values at Week 12 or later on Week 12: HbA1c >8%. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: From Week 26 to Week 52

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)1.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Requiring Rescue Therapy During the 26 Week Treatment Period: Core Period

Routine HbA1c value was used to determine the requirement of rescue medication. Threshold values at Week 12 or later on Week 12: HbA1c >8%. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)4.8
GLP-1 Receptor Agonist15.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Daily Average of the 7-point Self-monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) to Week 52: Single Arm Extension Period

The 7-point SMPG profile was measured at the following 7 points: pre-prandial and 2 hours postprandial for breakfast, lunch, dinner and at bedtime. Two hours postprandial (breakfast, lunch and dinner) was defined as 2 hours after the start of the meal. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)-1.68

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) to Week 52: Single Arm Extension Period

Change in HbA1c was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 52 value. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionpercentage of HbA1c (Mean)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)-1.01

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) to Week 26: Core Period

Change in HbA1c was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 value. Adjusted least squares (LS) mean and standard error (SE) were obtained from Mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) to account for missing data using all available post baseline data during the 26 week treatment period. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionpercentage of HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)-1.02
GLP-1 Receptor Agonist-0.38

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 52: Single Arm Extension Period

Change in FPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 52 value. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)-2.27

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 26: Core Period

Change in FPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 value. Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM to account for missing data using all available post baseline data during the 26 week treatment period. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmillimoles per litre (mmol/L) (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)-2.28
GLP-1 Receptor Agonist-0.60

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Weight to Week 52: Single Arm Extension Period

Change in body weight was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 52 value. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionkg (Mean)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)2.78

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7% or <=6.5% at Week 26: Core Period

Participants without any available HbA1c assessment at Week 26 were considered as non-responders. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: Week 26

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
HbA1c <7%HbA1c <=6.5%
GLP-1 Receptor Agonist25.79.9
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)61.940.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26: Core Period

Change in body weight was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 value. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionkilogram (kg) (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)1.89
GLP-1 Receptor Agonist-1.14

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 2-Hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) During Standardized Meal Test to Week 52: Single Arm Extension Period

The 2-hour PPG test measured blood glucose 2 hours after eating a liquid standardized breakfast meal. Change in PPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 52 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)-4.30

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 2-Hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) During Standardized Meal Test to Week 26: Core Period

The 2-hour PPG test measured blood glucose 2 hours after eating a liquid standardized breakfast meal. Change in PPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 value. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF). (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)-3.96
GLP-1 Receptor Agonist-1.11

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 2-Hour Blood Glucose Excursion During Standardized Meal Test to Week 52: Single Arm Extension Period

2-hour plasma glucose excursion = 2-hour PPG value minus plasma glucose value obtained 30 minutes prior to the start of meal and before IMP administration if IMP was injected before breakfast. Change in plasma glucose excursions were calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 52 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)-1.85

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 2-Hour Blood Glucose Excursion During Standardized Meal Test to Week 26: Core Period

2-hour plasma glucose excursion = 2-hour PPG value minus plasma glucose value obtained 30 minutes prior to the start of meal and before investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration if IMP was injected before breakfast. Change in plasma glucose excursions were calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)-1.51
GLP-1 Receptor Agonist-0.52

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Daily Average of the 7-point Self-monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) to Week 26: Core Period

The 7-point SMPG profile was measured at the following 7 points: pre-prandial and 2 hours postprandial for breakfast, lunch, dinner and at bedtime. Two hours postprandial (breakfast, lunch and dinner) was defined as 2 hours after the start of the meal. Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from MMRM to account for missing data using all available post baseline data during the 26 week treatment period. (NCT02787551)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination (FRC)-1.69
GLP-1 Receptor Agonist-0.67

[back to top]

Part A: Hematocrit Level at Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected for analysis of hematocrit level. Individual Par. data at indicated time points has been presented. (NCT02793154)
Timeframe: Day 5

InterventionProportion of RBC in blood (Number)
Par. 1Par. 2Par. 3Par. 4
Part A: Exenatide SC Injection0.3990.4260.4660.462

[back to top]

Part A: Hemoglobin Level at Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected for analysis of hemoglobin level. Individual Par. data at indicated time point has been presented. (NCT02793154)
Timeframe: Day 5

InterventionGrams per liter (Number)
Par. 1Par. 2Par. 3Par. 4
Part A: Exenatide SC Injection125133149156

[back to top]

Part A: Number of Par. With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation Par. temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability, is a congenital anomaly/ birth effect, other situations and is associated with liver injury or impaired liver function. Number of Par. with AEs and SAEs have been presented. (NCT02793154)
Timeframe: Up to 12 days

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any AEAny SAE
Part A: Exenatide SC Injection10

[back to top]

Part A: Number of Par. With Presence of Ketones, Occult Blood, Glucose, Nitrates and Leukocyte Esterase in Urine at Indicated Time Points

Urine samples were collected to analyze presence of ketones, occult blood, glucose, nitrates and leukocyte esterase in urine. The dipstick test gives results in a semi-quantitative manner. NA represents data was not available due to lab data transfer error. Individual Par. data at indicated time point has been presented. (NCT02793154)
Timeframe: Day 5

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Par. 1; Ketones; NegativePar 1; Occult blood; TracePar 1; GlucosePar 1; NitratesPar 1; Leukocyte esterasePar. 2; Ketones; NegativePar. 2; Occult blood; NegativePar. 2; GlucosePar 2; NitratesPar 2; Leukocyte esterasePar. 3; Ketones; NegativePar. 3; Occult blood; NegativePar. 3; GlucosePar 3; NitratesPar 3; Leukocyte esterasePar. 4; Ketones; NegativePar. 4; Occult blood; NegativePar. 4; GlucosePar 4; NitratesPar 4; Leukocyte esterase
Part A: Exenatide SC Injection11NANANA11NANANA11NANANA11NANANA

[back to top]

Part A: Percentage of Time With the Dominant EGG Frequencies in the Four Frequency Ranges of Bradygastria, Normal, Tachygastria and Duodenal

The effect of exenatide on gastric myoelectrical activity was assessed by EGG using WLT. EGG with WLT is a standardized test to induce gastric distention and measure myoelectrical responses. The gastric myoelectrical activity is generated by the pacemaker interstitial cells at a normal frequency of 3 cycles per minute. The shift of frequency from normal gastric myoelectrical activity to a slower rhythm is bradygastria or faster rhythm is tachygastria. Individual Par. data for dominant EGG frequencies including bradygastria, normal, tachygastria and duodenal at pre-WL and after treatment with exenatide at pre-WL and 10, 20, 30 minutes post-WL has been presented. (NCT02793154)
Timeframe: Up to Day 4

InterventionPercentage of time (Number)
Par. 1; Day 1; Pre-WL; BradygastriaPar. 1; Day 1; Pre-WL; NormalPar. 1; Day 1; Pre-WL; TachygastriaPar. 1; Day 1; Pre-WL; DuodenalPar. 1; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 1; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 1; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 1; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 1; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 1; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 1; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 1; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 1; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 1; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 1; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 1; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 1; Day 4; Pre-WL; BradygastriaPar. 1; Day 4; Pre-WL; NormalPar. 1; Day 4; Pre-WL; TachygastriaPar. 1; Day 4; Pre-WL; DuodenalPar. 1; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 1; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 1; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 1; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 1; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 1; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 1; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 1; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 1; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 1; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 1; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 1; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 2; Day 1; Pre-WL; BradygastriaPar. 2; Day 1; Pre-WL; NormalPar. 2; Day 1; Pre-WL; TachygastriaPar. 2; Day 1; Pre-WL; DuodenalPar. 2; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 2; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 2; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 2; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 2; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 2; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 2; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 2; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 2; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 2; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 2; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 2; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 2; Day 4; Pre-WL; BradygastriaPar. 2; Day 4; Pre-WL; NormalPar. 2; Day 4; Pre-WL; TachygastriaPar. 2; Day 4; Pre-WL; DuodenalPar. 2; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 2; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 2; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 2; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 2; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 2; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 2; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 2; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 2; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 2; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 2; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 2; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 3; Day 1; Pre-WL; BradygastriaPar. 3; Day 1; Pre-WL; NormalPar. 3; Day 1; Pre-WL; TachygastriaPar. 3; Day 1; Pre-WL; DuodenalPar. 3; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 3; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 3; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 3; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 3; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 3; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 3; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 3; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 3; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 3; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 3; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 3; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 3; Day 4; Pre-WL; BradygastriaPar. 3; Day 4; Pre-WL; NormalPar. 3; Day 4; Pre-WL; TachygastriaPar. 3; Day 4; Pre-WL; DuodenalPar. 3; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 3; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 3; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 3; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 3; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 3; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 3; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 3; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 3; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 3; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 3; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 3; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 4; Day 1; Pre-WL; BradygastriaPar. 4; Day 1; Pre-WL; NormalPar. 4; Day 1; Pre-WL; TachygastriaPar. 4; Day 1; Pre-WL; DuodenalPar. 4; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 4; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 4; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 4; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 4; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 4; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 4; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 4; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 4; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 4; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 4; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 4; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 4; Day 4; Pre-WL; BradygastriaPar. 4; Day 4; Pre-WL; NormalPar. 4; Day 4; Pre-WL; TachygastriaPar. 4; Day 4; Pre-WL; DuodenalPar. 4; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 4; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 4; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 4; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 4; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 4; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 4; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 4; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 4; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 4; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 4; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 4; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; Duodenal
Part A: Exenatide SC Injection802000100000100000505000100000100000100000505000100000100000100000100000100000100000100000505000100000100000010000050500100000100000100000100000100000100000100000100000100000100000100000080200

[back to top]

Part A: Potential of Hydrogen (pH) of Urine at Indicated Time Points

Urine Samples were collected to analyze pH. pH is a measure of hydrogen ion concentration and used to determine the acidity or alkalinity of urine. pH scale ranges from 0 to 14. A neutral pH is 7.0. The higher number indicates the more basic (alkaline) nature of urine and lower the number indicates the more acidic urine.Individual Par. data at indicated time point has been presented. (NCT02793154)
Timeframe: Day 5

InterventionPoints on a scale (Number)
Par. 1Par. 2Par. 3Par. 4
Part A: Exenatide SC Injection55.565

[back to top]

Part A: Presence RBC and WBC in Urine Assessed by Microscopy

"Samples were collected to analyze the presence of RBC and WBC in urine by microscopy. Individual Par. data at indicated time point has been presented. NA indicates data was not available as RBC and WBC count would only available if blood or protein were abnormal. The RBC and WBC values of 1 for participant 1 actually reflect 0-1." (NCT02793154)
Timeframe: Day 5

InterventionHigh Power field (Number)
Par.1; RBCPar. 1; WBCPar. 2; RBCPar. 2; WBCPar. 3; RBCPart. 3; WBCPart 4; RBCPart. 4; WBC
Part A: Exenatide SC Injection11NANANANANANA

[back to top]

Part A: Rate of [13]C Dose Excreted in Breath

The effect of exenatide on gastric emptying was be assessed by calculating the percent dose excreted of 13C in breath multiplied by 1000 (kPCD). Breath samples were collected at the indicated time points. Individual Par. data at pre-meal and 45, 90, 120, 150, 180 and 240 minutes post-meal has been presented. (NCT02793154)
Timeframe: Day 5

InterventionkPCD per minute (Number)
Par. 1; Day 5; Pre-MealPar. 1; Day 5; 45 Minutes Post-MealPar. 1; Day 5; 90 Minutes Post-MealPar. 1; Day 5; 120 Minutes Post-MealPar. 1; Day 5; 150 Minutes Post-MealPar. 1; Day 5; 180 Minutes Post-MealPar. 1; Day 5; 240 Minutes Post-MealPar. 2; Day 5; Pre-MealPar. 2; Day 5; 45 Minutes Post-MealPar. 2; Day 5; 90 Minutes Post-MealPar. 2; Day 5; 120 Minutes Post-MealPar. 2; Day 5; 150 Minutes Post-MealPar. 2; Day 5; 180 Minutes Post-MealPar. 2; Day 5; 240 Minutes Post-MealPar. 3; Day 5; Pre-MealPar. 3; Day 5; 45 Minutes Post-MealPar. 3; Day 5; 90 Minutes Post-MealPar. 3; Day 5; 120 Minutes Post-MealPar. 3; Day 5; 150 Minutes Post-MealPar. 3; Day 5; 180 Minutes Post-MealPar. 3; Day 5; 240 Minutes Post-MealPar. 4; Day 5; Pre-MealPar. 4; Day 5; 45 Minutes Post-MealPar. 4; Day 5; 90 Minutes Post-MealPar. 4; Day 5; 120 Minutes Post-MealPar. 4; Day 5; 150 Minutes Post-MealPar. 4; Day 5; 180 Minutes Post-MealPar. 4; Day 5; 240 Minutes Post-Meal
Part A: Exenatide SC Injection01.83.33.13.37.421.1022.242.566.582.384.775.8012.36.516.428.256.3011.327.839.651.159.861.6

[back to top]

Part A: Ratios of Average Power Post- WLT/Pre-WLT by Frequency Region

The effect of exenatide on gastric myoelectrical activity was assessed by EGG using WLT. EGG with WLT is a standardized test to induce gastric distention and measure myoelectrical responses. The gastric myoelectrical activity is generated by the pacemaker interstitial cells at a normal frequency of 3 cycles per minute. The shift of frequency from normal gastric myoelectrical activity to a slower rhythm is bradygastria or faster rhythm is tachygastria. Individual Par. data for ratios of average power post- WLT/pre-WLT in the bradygastria, normal, tachygastria and duodenal range after treatment with exenatide at 10, 20, and 30 minutes post-WL has been presented. (NCT02793154)
Timeframe: Up to Day 4

InterventionRatio (Number)
Par. 1; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 1; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 1; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 1; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 1; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 1; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 1; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 1; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 1; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 1; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 1; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 1; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 1; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 1; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 1; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 1; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 1; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 1; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 1; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 1; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 1; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 1; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 1; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 1; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 2; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 2; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 2; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 2; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 2; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 2; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 2; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 2; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 2; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 2; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 2; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 2; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 2; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 2; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 2; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 2; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 2; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 2; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 2; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 2; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 2; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 2; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 2; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 2; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 3; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 3; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 3; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 3; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 3; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 3; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 3; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 3; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 3; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 3; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 3; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 3; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 3; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 3; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 3; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 3; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 3; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 3; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 3; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 3; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 3; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 3; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 3; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 3; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 4; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 4; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 4; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 4; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 4; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 4; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 4; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 4; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 4; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 4; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 4; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 4; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 4; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 4; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 4; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 4; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 4; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 4; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 4; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 4; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 4; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 4; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 4; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 4; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; Duodenal
Part A: Exenatide SC Injection0000000000000000000000000.010000.040.04000.010.02000.030000.030.020.0100.220.110.050.010.130.290.520.20.20.990.70.330.151.381.360.40.160.080.130.090.20.10.110.070.160.080.190.192.62.213.880.760.892.242.522.761.543.292.441.474.70.741.440.9710.242.282.981.553.411.63.51.74

[back to top]

Part A: Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count at Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected for analysis of RBC count. Individual Par. data at indicated time point has been presented. (NCT02793154)
Timeframe: Day 5

InterventionTetra unit per liter (Number)
Par. 1Par. 2Par. 3Par. 4
Part A: Exenatide SC Injection4.74.854.9

[back to top]

Part A: Specific Gravity of Urine at Indicated Time Points

Urine samples were collected to analyze specific gravity of urine. Specific gravity, is a measure of urine concentration and is measured using a chemical test. Specific gravity measurements provide a comparison of the amount of substances dissolved in urine as compared to pure water. If there were no solutes present, the specific gravity of urine would be 1.000 the same as pure water. Specific gravity between 1.002 and 1.035 could be considered as normal. Individual Par. data at indicated time point has been presented. (NCT02793154)
Timeframe: Day 5

InterventionKilograms per meter^3 (Number)
Par. 1Par. 2Par. 3Par. 4
Part A: Exenatide SC Injection1.0211.0191.0231.027

[back to top]

Part A: The Volume of Water Ingested During EGG

The volume of water consumed by Par. at indicated time points after treatment with exenatide during EGG with WLT was determined. An EGG with WLT is a standardized test to induce gastric distention. Individual Par. data has been presented. (NCT02793154)
Timeframe: Up to Day 4

InterventionMilliliter (Number)
Par. 1; Day 1Par. 1; Day 4Par. 2; Day 1Par. 2; Day 4Par. 3; Day 1Par. 3; Day 4Par. 4; Day 1Par. 4; Day 4
Part A: Exenatide SC Injection43036021601980900108010001000

[back to top]

Part A: Time to Half-gastric Emptying

Breath samples were collected to assess the time to half gastric emptying using gastric emptying breath test (GEBT) containing 13 Carbon (13C)-Spirulina pre-meal and post GEBT meal. The GEBT method was used to measure GE of solid food. The time to half gastric emptying for individual Par. has been presented. (NCT02793154)
Timeframe: Up to Day 5

InterventionMinutes (Number)
Par. 1; Day -1Par. 1; Day 5Par. 2; Day -1Par. 2; Day 5Par. 3; Day -1Par. 3; Day 5Par. 4; Day -1Par. 4; Day 5
Part A: Exenatide SC Injection87.2226.573.075.557.6174.052.9103.8

[back to top]

Part A: Total Protein, Albumin Levels at Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected for analysis of clinical chemistry parameters including total protein and albumin levels. Individual Par. data at indicated time point has been presented. (NCT02793154)
Timeframe: Day 5

InterventionGrams per liter (Number)
Par. 1; Total ProteinPar. 1; Albumin levelsPar. 2; Total ProteinPar. 2; Albumin levelsPar. 3; Total ProteinPar. 3; Albumin levelsPar. 4; Total ProteinPar. 4; Albumin levels
Part A: Exenatide SC Injection7743754671447446

[back to top]

Part A: Number of Par. With Nausea AEs Presenting Outside the Timing of the WLT and GCSI-DD

GCSI-DD is a questionnaire of gastroparesis symptom severity covering the following domains: nausea/vomiting, fullness/early satiety, and bloating. The effect of exenatide on gastric myoelectrical activity was assessed by EGG using WLT. (NCT02793154)
Timeframe: Up to 12 days

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Part A: Exenatide SC Injection0

[back to top]

Part A: Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT), Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT) Levels at Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected for analysis of clinical chemistry parameters including ALT, AST and GGT. Individual Par. data at indicated time point has been presented. (NCT02793154)
Timeframe: Day 5

InterventionInternational unit per liter (Number)
Par. 1; ALTPar. 1; ASTPar. 1; GGTPar. 2; ALTPar. 2; ASTPar. 2; GGTPar. 3; ALTPar. 3; ASTPar. 3; GGTPar. 4; ALTPar. 4; ASTPar. 4; GGT
Part A: Exenatide SC Injection212046251876111219172030

[back to top]

Part A: Albumin Level in Urine at Indicated Time Points

Samples were collected to analyze albumin level in urine. Individual Par. data at indicated time point has been collected. (NCT02793154)
Timeframe: Day 5

InterventionMilligrams per liter (Number)
Par. 1Par. 2Par. 3Par. 4
Part A: Exenatide SC Injection353555

[back to top]

Part A: Assessment of Heart Rate (HR) as a Measure of Safety

HR was measured either in a semi-recumbent or seated position after at least a 5-minute rest period. Individual Par. data for HR up to follow-up (up to 12 days) has been presented. (NCT02793154)
Timeframe: Up to 12 days

InterventionBeats per minute (Number)
Par. 1; Day -1Par. 1; Day 1Par. 1; Day 4Par. 1; Day 5Par. 1; Follow-upPar. 2; Day -1Par. 2; Day 1Par. 2; Day 4Par. 2; Day 5Par. 2; Follow-upPar. 3; Day -1Par. 3; Day 1Par. 3; Day 4Par. 3; Day 5Par. 3; Follow-upPar. 4; Day -1Par. 4; Day 1Par. 4; Day 4Par. 4; Day 5Par. 4; Follow-up
Part A: Exenatide SC Injection6965668468576462825872747882787889778272

[back to top]

Part A: Assessment of Nausea by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score

The effect of exenatide on gastric myoelectrical activity was evaluated using EGG with WLT. An EGG with WLT is a standardized test to induce gastric distention and collect VAS of upper gastrointestinal symptoms. The gastric distention produced by the WL induces nausea in Par. allowing the assessment of gastric myoelectrical activity during the episodes of nausea. The intensity of upper gastrointestinal symptom of nausea was measured using VAS ranging from 0 (no nausea) to 100 (severe nausea) immediately before (pre-WL) and 10, 20, 30 minutes post-WL. Individual Par. responses to VAS score scale has been presented. (NCT02793154)
Timeframe: Day 4

InterventionScores on a scale (Number)
Par. 1; Day 4; Pre-WLPar. 1; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WLPar. 1; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WLPar. 1; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WLPar. 2; Day 4; Pre-WLPar. 2; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WLPar. 2; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WLPar. 2; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WLPar. 3; Day 4; Pre-WLPar. 3; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WLPar. 3; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WLPar. 3; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WLPar. 4; Day 4; Pre-WLPar. 4; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WLPar. 4; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WLPar. 4; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL
Part A: Exenatide SC Injection42433442410004534

[back to top]

Part A: Assessment of Stomach Fullness, Hunger, Bloating and Abdominal Pain by VAS Score

The effect of exenatide on gastric myoelectrical activity was evaluated using EGG with WLT. An EGG with WLT is a standardized test to induce gastric distention and collect VAS of upper gastrointestinal symptoms. The gastric distention produced by the WL induces upper gastrointestinal symptoms including stomach fullness, hunger, bloating and abdominal pain in Par. allowing the assessment of gastric myoelectrical activity. The intensity of upper gastrointestinal symptoms was measured using VAS scores ranging from stomach empty (0) to stomach full (100), hunger (0) to satiety (100) and no bloating (0) to severe bloating (100). Individual Par. responses to VAS has been presented. (NCT02793154)
Timeframe: Day 4

InterventionScores on VAS scale (Number)
Par. 1; Day 4; Pre-WL; Stomach fullnessPar. 1; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL;Stomach fullnessPar. 1; Stomach fullness;Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WLPar. 1; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL;Stomach fullnessPar. 2; Day 4; Pre-WL;Stomach fullnessPar. 2; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL;Stomach fullnessPar. 2; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL;Stomach fullnessPar. 2; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL;Stomach fullnessPar. 3; Day 4; Pre-WL; Stomach fullnessPar. 3; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL;Stomach fullnessPar. 3; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL;Stomach fullnessPar. 3; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL;Stomach fullnessPar. 4; Day 4; Pre-WL;Stomach fullnessPar. 4; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL;Stomach fullnessPar. 4; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL;Stomach fullnessPar. 4; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL;Stomach fullnessPar. 1; Day 4; Pre-WL; BloatingPar. 1; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL;BloatingPar. 1; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL;BloatingPar. 1; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; BloatingPar. 2; Day 4; Pre-WL;BloatingPar. 2; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL;BloatingPar. 2; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL;BloatingPar. 2; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL;BloatingPar. 3; Bloating; Day 4; Pre-WL;BloatingPar. 3; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL;BloatingPar. 3; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL;BloatingPar. 3; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL;BloatingPar. 4; Day 4; Pre-WL; BloatingPar. 4; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL;BloatingPar. 4; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; BloatingPar. 4; Bloating; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WLPar. 1; Day 4; Pre-WL; Abdominal painPar. 1; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; Abdominal painPar. 1; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; Abdominal painPar. 1; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL;Abdominal painPar. 2; Day 4; Pre-WL; Abdominal painPar. 2; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; Abdominal painPar. 2; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; Abdominal painPar. 2; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL;Abdominal painPar. 3; Day 4; Pre-WL; Abdominal painPar. 3;Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; Abdominal painPar. 3; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; Abdominal painPar. 3; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; Abdominal painPar. 4; Day 4; Pre-WL; Abdominal painPar. 4; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL;Abdominal painPar. 4; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; Abdominal painPar. 4; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; Abdominal painPar. 1; Day 4; Pre-WL; HungerPar. 1; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; HungerPar. 1; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL;HungerPar. 1;Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL;HungerPar. 2; Day 4; Pre-WL;HungerPar. 2; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; HungerPar. 2; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; HungerPar. 2; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; HungerPar. 3; Day 4; Pre-WL; HungerPar. 3; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; HungerPar. 3; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; HungerPar. 3; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL;HungerPar. 4; Day 4; Pre-WL;HungerPar. 4; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; HungerPar. 4; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; HungerPar. 4; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL;Hunger
Part A: Exenatide SC Injection343509119492851089827528343835427464535626100132242353433447600004455887985843216192721361719162937

[back to top]

Part A: Assessment of Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) as a Measure of Safety

SBP and DBP was measured either in a semi-recumbent or seated position after at least a 5-minute rest period. Individual Par. data for SBP and DBP up to follow-up (up to 12 days) has been presented. (NCT02793154)
Timeframe: Up to 12 days

InterventionMillimeter of mercury (Number)
Par. 1; Day -1; SBPPar. 1; Day 1; SBPPar. 1; Day 4; SBPPar. 1; Day 5; SBPPar. 1; Follow-up; SBPPar. 1; Day -1; DBPPar. 1; Day 1; DBPPar. 1; Day 4; DBPPar. 1; Day 5; DBPPar. 1; Follow-up; DBPPar. 2; Day -1; SBPPar. 2; Day 1; SBPPar. 2; Day 4; SBPPar. 2; Day 5; SBPPar. 2; Follow-up; SBPPar. 2; Day -1; DBPPar. 2; Day 1; DBPPar. 2; Day 4; DBPPar. 2; Day 5; DBPPar. 2; Follow-up; DBPPar. 3; Day -1; SBPPar. 3; Day 1; SBPPar. 3; Day 4; SBPPar. 3; Day 5; SBPPar. 3; Follow-up; SBPPar. 3; Day -1; DBPPar. 3; Day 1; DBPPar. 3; Day 4; DBPPar. 3; Day 5; DBPPar. 3; Follow-up; DBPPar. 4; Day -1; SBPPar. 4; Day 1; SBPPar. 4; Day 4; SBPPar. 4; Day 5; SBPPar. 4; Follow-up; SBPPar. 4; Day -1; DBPPar. 4; Day 1; DBPPar. 4; Day 4; DBPPar. 4; Day 5; DBPPar. 4; Follow-up; DBP
Part A: Exenatide SC Injection1261211241121257161696772105109119121124616871687513113113211212686828776871381391271231608390838186

[back to top]

Part A: Average Dominant Frequency

The effect of exenatide on gastric myoelectrical activity was assessed by EGG using WLT. An EGG with WLT is a standardized test to induce gastric distention and measure myoelectrical responses. The gastric myoelectrical activity is generated by the pacemaker interstitial cells at a normal frequency of 3 cycles per minute. The shift of frequency from normal gastric myoelectrical activity to a slower rhythm is bradygastria or faster rhythm is tachygastria. Individual Par. data for average dominant frequency in the bradygastria, normal, tachygastria and duodenal range after treatment with exenatide at Pre-WL and 10, 20, 30 minutes post-WL has been presented. (NCT02793154)
Timeframe: Up to Day 4

InterventionCycles per minute (Number)
Par. 1; Day 1; Pre-WL; BradygastriaPar. 1; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 1; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 1; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 1; Day 4; Pre-WL; BradygastriaPar. 1; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 1; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 1; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 2; Day 1; Pre-WL; BradygastriaPar. 2; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 2; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 2; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 2; Day 4; Pre-WL; BradygastriaPar. 2; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 2; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 2; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 3; Day 1; Pre-WL; BradygastriaPar. 3; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 3; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 3; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 3; Day 4; Pre-WL; BradygastriaPar. 3; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 3; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 3; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 4; Day 1; Pre-WL; BradygastriaPar. 4; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 4; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 4; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 4; Day 4; Pre-WL; BradygastriaPar. 4; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 4; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 4; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; Normal
Part A: Exenatide SC Injection1.50.751.252.191.050.961.252.38111.51.750.751.3812.420.961.8334.131.21.50.941.50.861.881.71.191.20.941.292.9

[back to top]

Part A: Basophils, Eosinophil, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Platelet Count, Total Neutrophils, White Blood Cell (WBC) Level at Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected for analysis of hematology parameters including basophils, eosinophil, lymphocytes, monocytes, platelet count, total neutrophils, and WBC. Individual Par. data at indicated time point has been presented. (NCT02793154)
Timeframe: Day 5

InterventionGiga unit per liter (Number)
Par.1; BasophilsPar.1; EosinophilsPar.1; LymphocytesPar.1; MonocytesPar.1; Platelet countPar.1; Total NeutrophilsPar.1; WBCPar.2; BasophilsPar.2; EosinophilsPar.2; LymphocytesPar.2; MonocytesPar.2; Platelet countPar.2; Total NeutrophilsPar.2; WBCPar.3; BasophilsPar.3; EosinophilsPar.3; LymphocytesPar.3; MonocytesPar.3; Platelet countPar.3; Total NeutrophilsPar.3; WBCPar.4; BasophilsPar.4; EosinophilsPar.4; LymphocytesPar.4; MonocytesPar.4; Platelet countPar.4; Total NeutrophilsPar.4; WBC
Part A: Exenatide SC Injection0.020.111.570.352686.338.40.020.041.390.252172.544.20.030.211.770.582025.097.70.040.233.060.892301.25.4

[back to top]

Part A: Concentration of Creatinine in Urine at Indicated Time Points

Samples were collected to analyze concentration of creatinine in urine. Individual Par. at indicated time point has been presented at indicated time points. (NCT02793154)
Timeframe: Day 5

InterventionMicromoles per liter (Number)
Par. 1Par. 2Par. 3Par. 4
Part A: Exenatide SC Injection12450162401330022020

[back to top]

Part A: Creatinine, Direct Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, Indirect Bilirubin Levels at Indicated Time Points

Blood samples were collected for analysis of clinical chemistry parameters including creatinine, direct bilirubin, total bilirubin, indirect bilirubin levels. Individual Par. data at indicated time points has been presented. (NCT02793154)
Timeframe: Day 5

InterventionMicromoles per liter (Number)
Par. 1; CreatininePar. 1; Direct BilirubinPar. 1; Total BilirubinPar. 1; Indirect BilirubinPar. 2; CreatininePar. 2; Direct BilirubinPar. 2; Total BilirubinPar. 2; Indirect BilirubinPar. 3; CreatininePar. 3; Direct BilirubinPar. 3; Total BilirubinPar. 3; Indirect BilirubinPar. 4; CreatininePar. 4; Direct BilirubinPar. 4; Total BilirubinPar. 4; Indirect Bilirubin
Part A: Exenatide SC Injection67.22108105.226476.94161283.1264

[back to top]

Part A: Distribution of Average Power by Frequency Region

The effect of exenatide on gastric myoelectrical activity was assessed by electrogastrogram (EGG) using water load test (WLT). EGG with WLT is a standardized test to induce gastric distention and measure myoelectrical responses. The gastric myoelectrical activity is generated by the pacemaker interstitial cells at a normal frequency of 3 cycles per minute. The shift of frequency from normal gastric myoelectrical activity to a slower rhythm is bradygastria or faster rhythm is tachygastria. Individual Par. data for distribution of average power in the bradygastria, normal, tachygastria and duodenal range during pre-WL and 10, 20 and 30 minutes post-WL after treatment with exenatide has been presented. The analysis was performed on Pharmacodynamic Population, which included all Par. who received at least one dose of study medication and had valid data. (NCT02793154)
Timeframe: Up to Day 4

InterventionPercentage of power (Number)
Par. 1; Day 1; Pre-WL; BradygastriaPar. 1; Day 1; Pre-WL; NormalPar. 1; Day 1; Pre-WL; TachygastriaPar. 1; Day 1; Pre-WL; DuodenalPar. 1; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 1; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 1; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 1; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 1; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 1; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 1; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 1; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 1; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 1; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 1; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 1; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 1; Day 4; Pre-WL; BradygastriaPar. 1; Day 4; Pre-WL; NormalPar. 1; Day 4; Pre-WL; TachygastriaPar. 1; Day 4; Pre-WL; DuodenalPar. 1; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 1; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 1; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 1; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 1; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 1; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 1; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 1; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 1; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 1; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 1; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 1; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 2; Day 1; Pre-WL; BradygastriaPar. 2; Day 1; Pre-WL; NormalPar. 2; Day 1; Pre-WL; TachygastriaPar. 2; Day 1; Pre-WL; DuodenalPar. 2; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 2; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 2; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 2; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 2; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 2; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 2; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 2; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 2; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 2; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 2; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 2; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 2; Day 4; Pre-WL; BradygastriaPar. 2; Day 4; Pre-WL; NormalPar. 2; Day 4; Pre-WL; TachygastriaPar. 2; Day 4; Pre-WL; DuodenalPar. 2; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 2; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 2; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 2; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 2; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 2; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 2; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 2; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 2; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 2; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 2; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 2; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 3; Day 1; Pre-WL; BradygastriaPar. 3; Day 1; Pre-WL; NormalPar. 3; Day 1; Pre-WL; TachygastriaPar. 3; Day 1; Pre-WL; DuodenalPar. 3; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 3; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 3; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 3; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 3; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 3; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 3; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 3; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 3; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 3; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 3; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 3; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 3; Day 4; Pre-WL; BradygastriaPar. 3; Day 4; Pre-WL; NormalPar. 3; Day 4; Pre-WL; TachygastriaPar. 3; Day 4; Pre-WL; DuodenalPar. 3; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 3; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 3; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 3; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 3; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 3; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 3; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 3; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 3; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 3; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 3; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 3; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 4; Day 1; Pre-WL; BradygastriaPar. 4; Day 1; Pre-WL; NormalPar. 4; Day 1; Pre-WL; TachygastriaPar. 4; Day 1; Pre-WL; DuodenalPar. 4; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 4; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 4; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 4; Day 1; 10 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 4; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 4; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 4; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 4; Day 1; 20 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 4; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 4; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 4; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 4; Day 1; 30 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 4; Day 4; Pre-WL; BradygastriaPar. 4; Day 4; Pre-WL; NormalPar. 4; Day 4; Pre-WL; TachygastriaPar. 4; Day 4; Pre-WL; DuodenalPar. 4; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 4; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 4; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 4; Day 4; 10 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 4; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 4; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 4; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 4; Day 4; 20 minutes Post-WL; DuodenalPar. 4; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; BradygastriaPar. 4; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; NormalPar. 4; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; TachygastriaPar. 4; Day 4; 30 minutes Post-WL; Duodenal
Part A: Exenatide SC Injection56.1523.49173.3593.972.92.40.7357.1323.2913.176.4143.4436.1617.782.6271.94139.515.5543.9912.9428.3314.7473.8710.978.776.3948.8716.6623.1611.3167.4410.6717.24.6894.052.462.830.6785.6411.722.430.2277.3415.576.230.8643.3223.8218.7114.1484.237.936.811.0266.3219.4311.72.5573.0519.646.470.8459.669.0522.398.9132.7311.0348.777.4729.9422.8439.727.516.3222.4854.776.4352.8516.6413.2117.2964.2710.3713.2612.171.6611.119.527.7253.978.6116.1221.382.476.667.863.0181.895.611.630.8862.9612.8417.047.1773.6412.711.12.5654.9817.622.974.4583.74.210.691.482.965.9210.11.0239.0142.6116.771.62

[back to top]

Part A: Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate at Indicated Time Points

"Estimated glomerular filtration rate was calculated using the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula by multiplying 175 with serum creatinine^-1.154 multiplied by age^-0.203 multiplied by 0.742 (if female) multiplied by 1.212 (if African American Par.). Individual Par. data at indicated time point has been presented." (NCT02793154)
Timeframe: Day 5

InterventionMilliliter per second per 1.73 meter ^2 (Number)
Part. 1Part. 2Part. 3Part. 4
Part A: Exenatide SC Injection1.30261.28591.51971.6533

[back to top]

Part A: Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index -Daily Diary (GCSI-DD) Score

GCSI-DD is a questionnaire of gastroparesis symptom severity covering the following domains: episodes (epi) of vomiting, epi of retching, nausea/vomiting, fullness/early satiety, and bloating. GCSI-DD contains two symptom severity items upper abdominal pain and overall rating of gastroparesis symptoms. Par. rate each symptom on a 6-point scale from 0 (none), 1 (very mild), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe),to 5 (very severe). Individual Par. data has been presented. All Subjects Population was used which consisted of all Par. who received at least one dose of study medication. (NCT02793154)
Timeframe: Up to Day 5

InterventionScores on GCSI-DD scale (Number)
Par. 1; Day-1; Epi of vomitingPar. 1; Day 1; Epi of vomitingPar. 1; Day 4; Epi of vomitingPar. 1; Day 5; Epi of vomitingPar. 1; Day -1; Epi of retchingPar. 1; Day 1; Epi of retchingPar. 1; Day 4; Epi of retchingPar. 1; Day 5; Epi of retchingPar 1; Day -1; NauseaPar 1; Day 1; NauseaPar 1; Day 4; NauseaPar 1; Day 5; NauseaPar 1; Day -1; Excessively full after mealsPar 1; Day 1; Excessively full after mealsPar 1; Day 4; Excessively full after mealsPar 1; Day 5; Excessively full after mealsPar 1; Day -1; BloatingPar 1; Day 1; BloatingPar 1; Day 4; BloatingPar 1; Day 5; BloatingPar 1; Day -1; Unable to finish normal-sized mealPar 1; Day 1; Unable to finish normal-sized mealPar 1; Day 4; Unable to finish normal-sized mealPar 1; Day 5; Unable to finish normal-sized mealPar 1; Day -1; RetchingPar 1; Day 1; RetchingPar 1; Day 4; RetchingPar 1; Day 5; RetchingPar 1; Day -1; VomitingPar 1; Day 1; VomitingPar 1; Day 4; VomitingPar 1; Day 5; VomitingPar 1; Day -1; Stomach or belly visibly largerPar 1; Day 1; Stomach or belly visibly largerPar 1; Day 4; Stomach or belly visibly largerPar 1; Day 5; Stomach or belly visibly largerPar 1; Day -1; Stomach fullnessPar 1; Day 1; Stomach fullnessPar 1; Day 4; Stomach fullnessPar 1; Day 5; Stomach fullnessPar 1; Day -1; Loss of appetitePar 1; Day 1; Loss of appetitePar 1; Day 4; Loss of appetitePar 1; Day 5; Loss of appetitePar 1; Day -1; Upper abdominal painPar 1; Day 1; Upper abdominal painPar 1; Day 4; Upper abdominal painPar 1; Day 5; Upper abdominal painPar 1; Day -1; Upper abdominal discomfortPar 1; Day 1; Upper abdominal discomfortPar 1; Day 4; Upper abdominal discomfortPar 1; Day 5; Upper abdominal discomfortPar 1; Day -1; Overall severity of gastroparesisPar 1; Day 1; Overall severity of gastroparesisPar 1; Day 4; Overall severity of gastroparesisPar 1; Day 5; Overall severity of gastroparesisPar. 2; Day -1; Epi of vomitingPar. 2; Day 1; Epi of vomitingPar. 2; Day 4; Epi of vomitingPar. 2; Day 5; Epi of vomitingPar. 2; Day -1; Epi of retchingPar. 2; Day 1; Epi of retchingPar. 2; Day 4; Epi of retchingPar. 2; Day 5; Epi of retchingPar. 2; Day -1; NauseaPar. 2 Day 1; NauseaPar. 2; Day 4; NauseaPar. 2; Day 5; NauseaPar. 2; Day -1; Excessively full after mealsPar. 2; Day 1; Excessively full after mealsPar. 2; Day 4; Excessively full after mealsPar. 2; Day 5; Excessively full after mealsPar. 2; Day -1; BloatingPar. 2; Day 1; BloatingPar. 2; Day 4; BloatingPar. 2; Day 5; BloatingPar. 2; Day -1; Unable to finish normal-sized mealPar. 2; Day 1; Unable to finish normal-sized mealPar. 2; Day 4; Unable to finish normal-sized mealPar. 2; Day 5; Unable to finish normal-sized mealPar. 2; Day -1; RetchingPar. 2; Day 1; RetchingPar. 2; Day 4; RetchingPar. 2; Day 5; RetchingPar. 2; Day -1; VomitingPar. 2; Day 1; VomitingPar. 2; Day 4; VomitingPar. 2; Day 5; VomitingPar. 2; Day -1; Stomach or belly visibly largerPar. 2; Day 1; Stomach or belly visibly largerPar. 2; Day 4; Stomach or belly visibly largerPar. 2; Day 5; Stomach or belly visibly largerPar. 2; Day -1; Stomach fullnessPar. 2; Day 1; Stomach fullnessPar. 2; Day 4; Stomach fullnessPar. 2; Day 5; Stomach fullnessPar. 2; Day -1; Loss of appetitePar. 2; Day 1; Loss of appetitePar. 2; Day 4; Loss of appetitePar. 2; Day 5; Loss of appetitePar. 2; Day -1; Upper abdominal painPar. 2; Day 1; Upper abdominal painPar. 2; Day 4; Upper abdominal painPar. 2; Day 5; Upper abdominal painPar. 2; Day -1; Upper abdominal discomfortPar. 2; Day 1; Upper abdominal discomfortPar. 2; Day 4; Upper abdominal discomfortPar. 2; Day 5; Upper abdominal discomfortPar. 2; Day -1; Overall severity of gastroparesisPar. 2; Day 1; Overall severity of gastroparesisPar. 2; Day 4; Overall severity of gastroparesisPar. 2; Day 5; Overall severity of gastroparesisPar. 3; Day -1; Epi of vomitingPar. 3; Day 1; Epi of vomitingPar. 3; Day 4; Epi of vomitingPar. 3; Day 5; Epi of vomitingPar. 3; Day -1; Epi of retchingPar. 3; Day 1; Epi of retchingPar. 3; Day 4; Epi of retchingPar. 3; Day 5; Epi of retchingPar. 3; Day -1; NauseaPar. 3; Day 1; NauseaPar. 3; Day 4; NauseaPar. 3; Day 5; NauseaPar. 3; Day -1; Excessively full after mealsPar. 3; Day 1; Excessively full after mealsPar. 3; Day 4; Excessively full after mealsPar. 3; Day 5; Excessively full after mealsPar. 3; Day -1; BloatingPar. 3; Day 1; BloatingPar. 3; Day 4; BloatingPar. 3; Day 5; BloatingPar. 3; Day -1; Unable to finish normal-sized mealPar. 3; Day 1; Unable to finish normal-sized mealPar. 3; Day 4; Unable to finish normal-sized mealPar. 3; Day 5; Unable to finish normal-sized mealPar. 3; Day -1; RetchingPar. 3; Day 1; RetchingPar. 3; Day 4; RetchingPar. 3; Day 5; RetchingPar. 3; Day -1; VomitingPar. 3; Day 1; VomitingPar. 3; Day 4; VomitingPar. 3; Day 5; VomitingPar. 3; Day -1; Stomach or belly visibly largerPar. 3; Day 1; Stomach or belly visibly largerPar. 3; Day 4; Stomach or belly visibly largerPar. 3; Day 5; Stomach or belly visibly largerPar. 3; Day -1; Stomach fullnessPar. 3; Day 1; Stomach fullnessPar. 3; Day 4; Stomach fullnessPar. 3; Day 5; Stomach fullnessPar. 3; Day -1; Loss of appetitePar. 3; Day 1; Loss of appetitePar. 3; Day 4; Loss of appetitePar. 3; Day 5; Loss of appetitePar. 3; Day -1; Upper abdominal painPar. 3; Day 1; Upper abdominal painPar. 3; Day 4; Upper abdominal painPar. 3; Day 5; Upper abdominal painPar. 3; Day -1; Upper abdominal discomfortPar. 3; Day 1; Upper abdominal discomfortPar. 3; Day 4; Upper abdominal discomfortPar. 3; Day 5; Upper abdominal discomfortPar. 3; Day -1; Overall severity of gastroparesisPar. 3; Day 1; Overall severity of gastroparesisPar. 3; Day 4; Overall severity of gastroparesisPar. 3; Day 5; Overall severity of gastroparesisPar. 4; Day -1; Epi of vomitingPar. 4; Day 1; Epi of vomitingPar. 4; Day 4; Epi of vomitingPar. 4; Day 5; Epi of vomitingPar. 4; Day -1; Epi of retchingPar. 4; Day 1; Epi of retchingPar. 4; Day 4; Epi of retchingPar. 4; Day 5; Epi of retchingPar. 4; Day -1; NauseaPar. 4; Day 1; NauseaPar. 4; Day 4; NauseaPar. 4; Day 5; NauseaPar. 4; Day -1; Excessively full after mealsPar. 4; Day 1; Excessively full after mealsPar. 4; Day 4; Excessively full after mealsPar. 4; Day 5; Excessively full after mealsPar. 4; Day -1; BloatingPar. 4; Day 1; BloatingPar. 4; Day 4; BloatingPar. 4; Day 5; BloatingPar.4; Day -1; Unable to finish normal-sized mealPar.4; Day 1; Unable to finish normal-sized mealPar.4; Day 4; Unable to finish normal-sized mealPar.4; Day 5; Unable to finish normal-sized mealPar. 4; Day -1; RetchingPar. 4; Day 1; RetchingPar. 4; Day 4; RetchingPar. 4; Day 5; RetchingPar. 4; Day -1; VomitingPar. 4; Day 1; VomitingPar. 4; Day 4; VomitingPar. 4; Day 5; VomitingPar. 4; Day -1; Stomach or belly visibly largerPar. 4; Day 1; Stomach or belly visibly largerPar. 4; Day 4; Stomach or belly visibly largerPar. 4; Day 5; Stomach or belly visibly largerPar. 4; Day -1; Stomach fullnessPar. 4; Day 1; Stomach fullnessPar. 4; Day 4; Stomach fullnessPar. 4; Day 5; Stomach fullnessPar. 4; Day -1; Loss of appetitePar. 4; Day 1; Loss of appetitePar. 4; Day 4; Loss of appetitePar. 4; Day 5; Loss of appetitePar. 4; Day -1; Upper abdominal painPar. 4; Day 1; Upper abdominal painPar. 4; Day 4; Upper abdominal painPar. 4; Day 5; Upper abdominal painPar. 4; Day -1; Upper abdominal discomfortPar. 4; Day 1; Upper abdominal discomfortPar. 4; Day 4; Upper abdominal discomfortPar. 4; Day 5; Upper abdominal discomfortPar. 4; Day -1; Overall severity of gastroparesisPar. 4; Day 1; Overall severity of gastroparesisPar. 4; Day 4; Overall severity of gastroparesisPar. 4; Day 5; Overall severity of gastroparesis
Part A: Exenatide SC Injection00000000002122520005225200210000000022552202000300030004000000000000000000000000000000000000001000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001100100000000000000000001100000000000000110

[back to top]

Part A: Glucose, Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium, Sodium, Phosphorus Inorganic, Chloride, Urea/Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) Levels

Blood samples were collected for analysis of glucose, calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, phosphorus inorganic, chloride, and urea/BUN levels. Individual Par. data at indicated time point has been presented. (NCT02793154)
Timeframe: Day 5

InterventionMillimoles per liter (Number)
Par. 1; GlucosePar. 1; CalciumPar. 1; MagnesiumPar. 1; PotassiumPar. 1; SodiumPar. 1; Phosphorus inorganicPar. 1; ChloridePar. 1; Urea/BUNPar. 2; GlucosePar. 2; CalciumPar. 2; MagnesiumPar. 2; PotassiumPar. 2; SodiumPar. 2; Phosphorus inorganicPar. 2; ChloridePar. 2; Urea/BUNPar. 3; GlucosePar. 3; CalciumPar. 3; MagnesiumPar. 3; PotassiumPar. 3; SodiumPar. 3; Phosphorus inorganicPar. 3; ChloridePar. 3; Urea/BUNPar. 4; GlucosePar. 4; CalciumPar. 4; MagnesiumPar. 4; PotassiumPar. 4; SodiumPar. 4; Phosphorus inorganicPar. 4; ChloridePar. 4; Urea/BUN
Part A: Exenatide SC Injection9.22.440.865.61391.51057.57.52.440.95.11391.251056.59.12.380.84.21401.210377.92.40.84.31381.151014.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Urinalysis

Urinalysis parameters included assessment of specific gravity, microscopic analysis, and potential of hydrogen (pH), glucose, protein, blood and ketones by dipstick method. (NCT02802514)
Timeframe: Up to Week 11

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Albiglutide 50 mg0
Exenatide 10 µg0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Heart Rate for Session 1

Data of participants with abnormal heart rate (measured during site visits by sphygmomanometer) were reported. Participants with low and high heart rate has been presented. Potential clinical concern value for heart rate is < 50 beats per minute to > 120 beats per minute. Safety Population comprised of all participants who received at least one dose of the study treatment. (NCT02802514)
Timeframe: Day 1: pre-MRI, 0.5 hour post-MRI; Day 4: -2 hours pre-MRI, 0.5 and 1 hour post MRI; Day 5; Day 8: -2 hour pre-MRI, 0.5 and 1 hour post-MRI

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Day 5, high, n=0, 0, 0, 2Day 5, low, n=0, 0, 0, 2
Off-therapy Visit00

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Heart Rate for Session 1

Data of participants with abnormal heart rate (measured during site visits by sphygmomanometer) were reported. Participants with low and high heart rate has been presented. Potential clinical concern value for heart rate is < 50 beats per minute to > 120 beats per minute. Safety Population comprised of all participants who received at least one dose of the study treatment. (NCT02802514)
Timeframe: Day 1: pre-MRI, 0.5 hour post-MRI; Day 4: -2 hours pre-MRI, 0.5 and 1 hour post MRI; Day 5; Day 8: -2 hour pre-MRI, 0.5 and 1 hour post-MRI

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Day 1, Pre MRI, high, n=0, 0, 2, 0Day 1, Pre MRI, low, n=0, 0, 2, 0Day 1, Post MRI 0.5 hr, high, n=0, 0, 2, 0Day 1, Post MRI 0.5 hr, low, n=0, 0, 2, 0
Off-therapy MRI Arm0000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Heart Rate for Session 2

Data of participants with abnormal heart rate (measured during site visits by sphygmomanometer) were reported. Participants with low and high heart rate has been presented. Potential clinical concern value for heart rate is < 50 beats per minute to > 120 beats per minute. (NCT02802514)
Timeframe: Day 1: pre-MRI, 0.5 hour post-MRI; Day 4: -2 hours pre-MRI, 0.5 and 1 hour post MRI; Day 5; Day 8: -2 hour pre-MRI, 0.5 and 1 hour post-MRI

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Day 4, -2 hr pre-MRI, high, n=1, 1,0, 0Day 4, -2 hr pre-MRI, low, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 4, Post MRI 0.5 hr, high, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 4, 0.5 hr Post MRI, low, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 4, 1 hr Post MRI, high, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 4, 1 hr Post MRI, low, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 8, -2 hr pre-MRI, high, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 8, -2 hr pre-MRI, low, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 8, 0.5 hr Post MRI, high, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 8, 0.5 hr Post MRI, low, n=1, 1, 0, 0
Albiglutide 50 mg0000000000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Heart Rate for Session 2

Data of participants with abnormal heart rate (measured during site visits by sphygmomanometer) were reported. Participants with low and high heart rate has been presented. Potential clinical concern value for heart rate is < 50 beats per minute to > 120 beats per minute. (NCT02802514)
Timeframe: Day 1: pre-MRI, 0.5 hour post-MRI; Day 4: -2 hours pre-MRI, 0.5 and 1 hour post MRI; Day 5; Day 8: -2 hour pre-MRI, 0.5 and 1 hour post-MRI

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Day 4, -2 hr pre-MRI, high, n=1, 1,0, 0Day 4, -2 hr pre-MRI, low, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 4, Post MRI 0.5 hr, high, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 4, 0.5 hr Post MRI, low, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 4, 1 hr Post MRI, high, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 4, 1 hr Post MRI, low, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 8, -2 hr pre-MRI, high, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 8, -2 hr pre-MRI, low, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 8, 0.5 hr Post MRI, high, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 8, 0.5 hr Post MRI, low, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 8, 1 hr Post MRI, high, n=0, 1, 0, 0Day 8, 1 hr Post MRI, low, n=0, 1, 0, 0
Exenatide 10 µg000000000000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Heart Rate for Session 2

Data of participants with abnormal heart rate (measured during site visits by sphygmomanometer) were reported. Participants with low and high heart rate has been presented. Potential clinical concern value for heart rate is < 50 beats per minute to > 120 beats per minute. (NCT02802514)
Timeframe: Day 1: pre-MRI, 0.5 hour post-MRI; Day 4: -2 hours pre-MRI, 0.5 and 1 hour post MRI; Day 5; Day 8: -2 hour pre-MRI, 0.5 and 1 hour post-MRI

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Day 5, high, n=0, 0, 0, 2Day 5, low, n=0, 0, 0, 2
Off-therapy Visit00

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) for Session 1

SBP and DBP were measured in supine position after 5 minutes rest. Data for Session 1 and 2 and for Pre and Post MRI has been presented. Potential clinical concern value for SBP is <100 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and >170 mmHg. Potential clinical concern value for DBP is <50 mmHg and >110 mmHg. (NCT02802514)
Timeframe: Day 1: pre-MRI, 0.5 hour post-MRI; Day 4: -2 hours pre-MRI, 0.5 and 1 hour post MRI; Day 5; Day 8: 0.5 and 1 hour post-MRI

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SBP, Day 4,-2 hr pre-MRI, high, n=1,1, 0, 0SBP, Day 4,-2 hr pre-MRI, low, n=1,1, 0, 0SBP, Day 4,0.5 hr post MRI , high, n=1,1, 0, 0SBP, Day 4,0.5 hr post MRI, low, n=1,1, 0, 0SBP, Day 4,1 hr post MRI , high, n=1,1, 0, 0SBP, Day 4,1 hr post MRI , low, n=1,1, 0, 0SBP, Day 8,0.5 hr Post MRI, high, n=1,1, 0, 0SBP, Day 8,0.5 hr Post MRI, low, n=1,1, 0, 0DBP, Day 4,-2 hr pre-MRI, high, n=1,1, 0, 0DBP, Day 4,-2 hr pre-MRI, low, n=1,1, 0, 0DBP, Day 4,0.5 hr Post MRI, high,n= 1,1, 0, 0DBP, Day 4,0.5 hr Post MRI, low,n= 1,1, 0, 0DBP, Day 4,1 hr post MRI, high,n= 1,1, 0, 0DBP, Day 4,1 hr post MRI , low,n= 1,1, 0, 0DBP, Day 8, 0.5 hr post MRI ,high, n=1,1,0, 0DBP, Day 8, 0.5 hr post MRI, low, n= 1,1, 0, 0
Albiglutide 50 mg0000000000000000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (AE) With Incidence > = 2 % and Serious AEs (SAE)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment were categorized as SAE. Data of participants with non-serious AEs ( with incidence >= 2%) and SAEs has been presented. Placebo was included to maintain the single blind only; similar to double dummy. (NCT02802514)
Timeframe: Up to Week 13

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Non-serious AEsSAE
Albiglutide 50 mg10
Albiglutide Matching Placebo00
Exenatide 10 µg00
Exenatide Matching Placebo00

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) for Session 1

SBP and DBP were measured in supine position after 5 minutes rest. Data for Session 1 and 2 and for Pre and Post MRI has been presented. Potential clinical concern value for SBP is <100 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and >170 mmHg. Potential clinical concern value for DBP is <50 mmHg and >110 mmHg. (NCT02802514)
Timeframe: Day 1: pre-MRI, 0.5 hour post-MRI; Day 4: -2 hours pre-MRI, 0.5 and 1 hour post MRI; Day 5; Day 8: 0.5 and 1 hour post-MRI

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SBP, Day 1, Pre-MRI, high, n=0, 0, 2, 0SBP, Day 1, Pre-MRI, low, n=0, 0, 2, 0SBP, Day 1, 0.5 hr post MRI, high, n=0, 0, 2, 0SBP, Day 1,0.5 hr post MRI , low, n=0, 0, 2, 0DBP, Day 1, Pre MRI, high,n= 0,0, 2, 0DBP, Day 1, Pre MRI, low,n= 0, 0, 2, 0DBP, Day 1,0.5 hr post MRI, high,n= 0, 0, 2, 0DBP, Day 1,0.5 hr post MRI, low,n= 0, 0, 2, 0
Off-therapy MRI Arm00000000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal SBP and DBP for Session 2

SBP and DBP were measured in supine position after 5 minutes rest. Data for Session 1 and 2 and for Pre and Post MRI has been presented. Potential clinical concern value for SBP is <100 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and >170 mmHg. Potential clinical concern value for DBP is <50 mmHg and >110 mmHg. (NCT02802514)
Timeframe: Day 1: pre-MRI, 0.5 hour post-MRI; Day 4: -2 hours pre-MRI, 0.5 and 1 hour post MRI; Day 5; Day 8: 0.5 and 1 hour post-MRI

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SBP, Day 5, high, n=0, 0, 0, 2SBP, Day 5, low, n=0, 0, 0, 2DBP, Day 5, high, n= 0,0,0,2DBP, Day 5, low, n= 0,0,0,2
Off-therapy Visit0000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Heart Rate for Session 2

Data of participants with abnormal heart rate (measured during site visits by sphygmomanometer) were reported. Participants with low and high heart rate has been presented. Potential clinical concern value for heart rate is < 50 beats per minute to > 120 beats per minute. (NCT02802514)
Timeframe: Day 1: pre-MRI, 0.5 hour post-MRI; Day 4: -2 hours pre-MRI, 0.5 and 1 hour post MRI; Day 5; Day 8: -2 hour pre-MRI, 0.5 and 1 hour post-MRI

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Day 1, Pre MRI, high, n=0, 0, 2, 0Day 1, Pre MRI, low, n=0, 0, 2, 0Day 1, Post MRI 0.5 hr, high, n=0, 0, 2, 0Day 1, Post MRI 0.5 hr, low, n=0, 0, 2, 0
Off-therapy MRI Arm0000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) for Session 1

SBP and DBP were measured in supine position after 5 minutes rest. Data for Session 1 and 2 and for Pre and Post MRI has been presented. Potential clinical concern value for SBP is <100 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and >170 mmHg. Potential clinical concern value for DBP is <50 mmHg and >110 mmHg. (NCT02802514)
Timeframe: Day 1: pre-MRI, 0.5 hour post-MRI; Day 4: -2 hours pre-MRI, 0.5 and 1 hour post MRI; Day 5; Day 8: 0.5 and 1 hour post-MRI

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SBP, Day 4,-2 hr pre-MRI, high, n=1,1, 0, 0SBP, Day 4,-2 hr pre-MRI, low, n=1,1, 0, 0SBP, Day 4,0.5 hr post MRI , high, n=1,1, 0, 0SBP, Day 4,0.5 hr post MRI, low, n=1,1, 0, 0SBP, Day 4,1 hr post MRI , high, n=1,1, 0, 0SBP, Day 4,1 hr post MRI , low, n=1,1, 0, 0SBP, Day 8,0.5 hr Post MRI, high, n=1,1, 0, 0SBP, Day 8,0.5 hr Post MRI, low, n=1,1, 0, 0SBP, Day 8,1 hr Post MRI, high, n= 0,1, 0, 0SBP, Day 8,1 hr post MRI , low, n= 0,1, 0, 0DBP, Day 4,-2 hr pre-MRI, high, n=1,1, 0, 0DBP, Day 4,-2 hr pre-MRI, low, n=1,1, 0, 0DBP, Day 4,0.5 hr Post MRI, high,n= 1,1, 0, 0DBP, Day 4,0.5 hr Post MRI, low,n= 1,1, 0, 0DBP, Day 4,1 hr post MRI, high,n= 1,1, 0, 0DBP, Day 4,1 hr post MRI , low,n= 1,1, 0, 0DBP, Day 8, 0.5 hr post MRI ,high, n=1,1,0, 0DBP, Day 8, 0.5 hr post MRI, low, n= 1,1, 0, 0DBP, Day 8, 1 hr post MRI, high, n=0,1, 0, 0DBP, Day 8, 1 hr post MRI, low, n=0,1, 0, 0
Exenatide 10 µg00000000000000000000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal SBP and DBP for Session 2

SBP and DBP were measured in supine position after 5 minutes rest. Data for Session 1 and 2 and for Pre and Post MRI has been presented. Potential clinical concern value for SBP is <100 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and >170 mmHg. Potential clinical concern value for DBP is <50 mmHg and >110 mmHg. (NCT02802514)
Timeframe: Day 1: pre-MRI, 0.5 hour post-MRI; Day 4: -2 hours pre-MRI, 0.5 and 1 hour post MRI; Day 5; Day 8: 0.5 and 1 hour post-MRI

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SBP, Day 4,-2 hr pre-MRI, high, n=1,1, 0, 0SBP, Day 4,-2 hr pre-MRI, low, n=1,1, 0, 0SBP, Day 4,0.5 hr post MRI , high, n=1,1, 0, 0SBP, Day 4,0.5 hr post MRI, low, n=1,1, 0, 0SBP, Day 4,1 hr post MRI , high, n=1,1, 0, 0SBP, Day 4,1 hr post MRI , low, n=1,1, 0, 0SBP, Day 8,0.5 hr Post MRI, high, n=1,1, 0, 0SBP, Day 8,0.5 hr Post MRI, low, n=1,1, 0, 0DBP, Day 4,-2 hr pre-MRI, high, n=1,1, 0, 0DBP, Day 4,-2 hr pre-MRI, low, n=1,1, 0, 0DBP, Day 4,0.5 hr Post MRI, high,n= 1,1, 0, 0DBP, Day 4,0.5 hr Post MRI, low,n= 1,1, 0, 0DBP, Day 4,1 hr post MRI, high,n= 1,1, 0, 0DBP, Day 4,1 hr post MRI , low,n= 1,1, 0, 0DBP, Day 8, 0.5 hr post MRI ,high, n=1,1,0, 0DBP, Day 8, 0.5 hr post MRI, low, n= 1,1, 0, 0
Albiglutide 50 mg0000000000000000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal SBP and DBP for Session 2

SBP and DBP were measured in supine position after 5 minutes rest. Data for Session 1 and 2 and for Pre and Post MRI has been presented. Potential clinical concern value for SBP is <100 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and >170 mmHg. Potential clinical concern value for DBP is <50 mmHg and >110 mmHg. (NCT02802514)
Timeframe: Day 1: pre-MRI, 0.5 hour post-MRI; Day 4: -2 hours pre-MRI, 0.5 and 1 hour post MRI; Day 5; Day 8: 0.5 and 1 hour post-MRI

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SBP, Day 4,-2 hr pre-MRI, high, n=1,1, 0, 0SBP, Day 4,-2 hr pre-MRI, low, n=1,1, 0, 0SBP, Day 4,0.5 hr post MRI , high, n=1,1, 0, 0SBP, Day 4,0.5 hr post MRI, low, n=1,1, 0, 0SBP, Day 4,1 hr post MRI , high, n=1,1, 0, 0SBP, Day 4,1 hr post MRI , low, n=1,1, 0, 0SBP, Day 8,0.5 hr Post MRI, high, n=1,1, 0, 0SBP, Day 8,0.5 hr Post MRI, low, n=1,1, 0, 0SBP, Day 8,1 hr Post MRI, high, n= 0,1, 0, 0SBP, Day 8,1 hr post MRI , low, n= 0,1, 0, 0DBP, Day 4,-2 hr pre-MRI, high, n=1,1, 0, 0DBP, Day 4,-2 hr pre-MRI, low, n=1,1, 0, 0DBP, Day 4,0.5 hr Post MRI, high,n= 1,1, 0, 0DBP, Day 4,0.5 hr Post MRI, low,n= 1,1, 0, 0DBP, Day 4,1 hr post MRI, high,n= 1,1, 0, 0DBP, Day 4,1 hr post MRI , low,n= 1,1, 0, 0DBP, Day 8, 0.5 hr post MRI ,high, n=1,1,0, 0DBP, Day 8, 0.5 hr post MRI, low, n= 1,1, 0, 0DBP, Day 8, 1 hr post MRI, high, n=0,1, 0, 0DBP, Day 8, 1 hr post MRI, low, n=0,1, 0, 0
Exenatide 10 µg00000000000000000000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) for Session 1

SBP and DBP were measured in supine position after 5 minutes rest. Data for Session 1 and 2 and for Pre and Post MRI has been presented. Potential clinical concern value for SBP is <100 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and >170 mmHg. Potential clinical concern value for DBP is <50 mmHg and >110 mmHg. (NCT02802514)
Timeframe: Day 1: pre-MRI, 0.5 hour post-MRI; Day 4: -2 hours pre-MRI, 0.5 and 1 hour post MRI; Day 5; Day 8: 0.5 and 1 hour post-MRI

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SBP, Day 5, high, n=0, 0, 0, 2SBP, Day 5, low, n=0, 0, 0, 2DBP, Day 5, high, n= 0,0,0,2DBP, Day 5, low, n= 0,0,0,2
Off-therapy Visit0000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Chemistry Parameters

Clinical chemistry parameters included assessment of blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, epidermal growth factor receptor (eGRF), potassium, sodium, calcium, Aspartate transaminase (AST), Alanine transaminase (AST), Alkaline phosphatase, total and direct bilirubin, total protein and albumin. (NCT02802514)
Timeframe: Up to Week 11

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Albiglutide 50 mg0
Exenatide 10 µg0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Glycemic Parameters

Glycemic parameters included assessment of capillary blood glucose and fasting plasma glucose. (NCT02802514)
Timeframe: Up to Week 11

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Albiglutide 50 mg0
Exenatide 10 µg0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology Parameters

Hematology parameters included assessment of platelet count, red blood cell (RBC) count, hemoglobin, hemotocrit, RBC indices including mean corpuscular volume and mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), and White blood cells (WBC) count with differential count including, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils and basophils. (NCT02802514)
Timeframe: Up to Week 11

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Albiglutide 50 mg0
Exenatide 10 µg0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal SBP and DBP for Session 2

SBP and DBP were measured in supine position after 5 minutes rest. Data for Session 1 and 2 and for Pre and Post MRI has been presented. Potential clinical concern value for SBP is <100 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and >170 mmHg. Potential clinical concern value for DBP is <50 mmHg and >110 mmHg. (NCT02802514)
Timeframe: Day 1: pre-MRI, 0.5 hour post-MRI; Day 4: -2 hours pre-MRI, 0.5 and 1 hour post MRI; Day 5; Day 8: 0.5 and 1 hour post-MRI

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SBP, Day 1, Pre-MRI, high, n=0, 0, 2, 0SBP, Day 1, Pre-MRI, low, n=0, 0, 2, 0SBP, Day 1, 0.5 hr post MRI, high, n=0, 0, 2, 0SBP, Day 1,0.5 hr post MRI , low, n=0, 0, 2, 0DBP, Day 1, Pre MRI, high,n= 0, 0, 2, 0DBP, Day 1, Pre MRI, low,n= 0, 0, 2, 0DBP, Day 1,0.5 hr post MRI, high,n= 0, 0, 2, 0DBP, Day 1,0.5 hr post MRI, low,n= 0, 0, 2, 0
Off-therapy MRI00000010

[back to top]

Gastrointestinal (GI) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Assessment of Nausea for Session 1

Participant completed VAS to record their perception of stomach fullness, hunger, nausea, bloating and abdominal pain. The VAS was represented by lines, 100 millimeter in length, anchored with words describing the most negative rating on the left and the most positive rating on the right. Scores ranged from 0 mm to 100 mm. Scores of 0 mm are worst (most negative rating on the left) and scores of 100 mm are best (most positive rating on the right). NA indicates that data were not available as standard deviation could not be calculated due to low number of participants. (NCT02802514)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Pre-MRI and 0.5 hour post-MRI); Day 4 (Pre-MRI and 0.5 hour post-MRI); and Day 8 (Pre-MRI and 0.5 hour post-MRI)

InterventionScores on scale (Mean)
Hunger, Day1, pre-MRI,n=0,0,2Hunger, Day1, 0.5 hour post-MRI,n=0,0,2Stomach fullness, Day1, pre-MRI,n=0,0,2Stomach fullness, Day1, 0.5 hour post-MRI,n=0,0,2Nausea, Day1, pre- MRI,n=0,0,2Nausea, Day1,0.5 hour post-MRI,n=0,0,2Bloating, Day1, pre-MRI,n=0,0,2Bloating, Day1, 0.5 hour post-MRI,n=0,0,2Abdominal pain, Day1, pre-MRI,n=0,0,2Abdominal pain, Day1,0.5 hour post-MRI,n=0,0,2
Off-therapy MRI29.055.09.00.51.019.01.51.02.01.5

[back to top]

Gastrointestinal (GI) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Assessment of Nausea for Session 1

Participant completed VAS to record their perception of stomach fullness, hunger, nausea, bloating and abdominal pain. The VAS was represented by lines, 100 millimeter in length, anchored with words describing the most negative rating on the left and the most positive rating on the right. Scores ranged from 0 mm to 100 mm. Scores of 0 mm are worst (most negative rating on the left) and scores of 100 mm are best (most positive rating on the right). NA indicates that data were not available as standard deviation could not be calculated due to low number of participants. (NCT02802514)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Pre-MRI and 0.5 hour post-MRI); Day 4 (Pre-MRI and 0.5 hour post-MRI); and Day 8 (Pre-MRI and 0.5 hour post-MRI)

,
InterventionScores on scale (Mean)
Hunger, Day4, pre-MRI,n=1,1,0Hunger, Day4, 0.5 hour post-MRI,n=1,1,0Hunger, Day8, pre-MRI,n=1,1,0Hunger, Day8, 0.5 hour post-MRI,n=1,1,0Stomach fullness, Day4,pre-MRI,n=1,1,0Stomach fullness, Day4, 0.5 hour post-MRI,n=1,1,0Stomach fullness, Day8, pre-MRI,n=1,1,0Stomach fullness, Day8, 0.5 hour post- MRI,n=1,1,0Nausea, Day4, pre-MRI,n=1,1,0Nausea, Day4, 0.5 hour post-MRI,n=1,1,0Nausea, Day8, pre-MRI,n=1,1,0Nausea, Day8,0.5 hour post-MRI,n=1,1,0Bloating, Day4, pre-MRI,n=1,1,0Bloating, Day4, 0.5 hour post-MRI,n=1,1,0Bloating, Day8, pre-MRI,n=1,1,0Bloating, Day8, 0.5 hour post-MRI,n=1,1,0Abdominal pain, Day4, pre-MRI,n=1,1,0Abdominal pain, Day4, 0.5 hour post-MRI,n=1,1,0Abdominal pain, Day8, pre-MRI,n=1,1,0Abdominal pain, Day8, 0.5 hour post-MRI,n=1,1,0
Exenatide 10 µg40.050.025.026.01.02.01.01.01.01.00.01.03.01.00.01.00.01.01.01.0
Albiglutide 50 mg65.066.01.031.03.06.00.00.03.024.00.00.02.04.00.00.03.05.00.00.0

[back to top]

GI VAS for Assessment of Nausea for Session 2

Participant completed VAS to record their perception of stomach fullness, hunger, nausea, bloating and abdominal pain. The VAS was represented by lines, 100 millimeter in length, anchored with words describing the most negative rating on the left and the most positive rating on the right. Scores ranged from 0 mm to 100 mm. Scores of 0 mm are worst (most negative rating on the left) and scores of 100 mm are best (most positive rating on the right). NA indicates that data were not available as standard deviation could not be calculated due to low number of participants. (NCT02802514)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Pre-MRI and 0.5 hour post-MRI); Day 4 (Pre-MRI and 0.5 hour post-MRI); and Day 8 (Pre-MRI and 0.5 hour post-MRI)

InterventionScores on scale (Mean)
Hunger, Day1, pre-MRI,n=0,0,2Hunger, Day1,0.5 hour post-MRI,n=0,0,2Stomach fullness, Day1, pre-MRI,n=0,0,2Stomach fullness, Day1, 0.5 hour post-MRI,n=0,0,2Nausea, Day1, pre-MRI,n=0,0,2Nausea, Day1, 0.5 hour post-MRI,n=0,0,2Bloating, Day1, pre-MRI,n=0, 0, 2Bloating, Day1, 0.5 hour post-MRI,n=0,0,2Abdominal pain, Day1, pre-MRI,n=0,0,2Abdominal pain, Day1, 0.5 hour post-MRI,n=0,0,2
Off-therapy MRI54.567.511.57.023.517.56.04.07.54.0

[back to top]

GI VAS for Assessment of Nausea for Session 2

Participant completed VAS to record their perception of stomach fullness, hunger, nausea, bloating and abdominal pain. The VAS was represented by lines, 100 millimeter in length, anchored with words describing the most negative rating on the left and the most positive rating on the right. Scores ranged from 0 mm to 100 mm. Scores of 0 mm are worst (most negative rating on the left) and scores of 100 mm are best (most positive rating on the right). NA indicates that data were not available as standard deviation could not be calculated due to low number of participants. (NCT02802514)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Pre-MRI and 0.5 hour post-MRI); Day 4 (Pre-MRI and 0.5 hour post-MRI); and Day 8 (Pre-MRI and 0.5 hour post-MRI)

,
InterventionScores on scale (Mean)
Hunger, Day4, pre-MRI,n=1,1,0Hunger, Day4,0.5 hour post-MRI,n=1,1,0Hunger, Day8, pre-MRI,n=1,1,0Hunger, Day8, 0.5 hour post-MRI,n=1,1,0Stomach fullness, Day4, pre-MRI,n=1,1,0Stomach fullness, Day4,0.5 hour post-MRI,n=1,1,0Stomach fullness, Day8, pre-MRI,n=1,1,0Stomach fullness, Day8,0.5 hour post-MRI,n=1,1,0Nausea, Day4, pre-MRI,n=1,1,0Nausea, Day4,0.5 hour post-MRI,n=1,1,0Nausea, Day8, pre-MRI,n=1,1,0Nausea, Day8, 0.5 hour post-MRI,n=1,1,0Bloating, Day4, pre-MRI,n=1,1,0Bloating, Day4,0.5 hour post-MRI,n=1,1,0Bloating, Day8, pre-MRI,n=1,1,0Bloating, Day8, 0.5 hour post-MRI,n=1,1,0Abdominal pain, Day4, pre-MRI,n=1,1,0Abdominal pain, Day4, 0.5 hour post-MRI,n=1,1,0Abdominal pain, Day8, pre-MRI,n=1,1,0Abdominal pain, Day8, 0.5 hour post-MRI,n=1,1,0
Albiglutide 50 mg2.057.038.053.02.01.011.03.01.00.02.02.02.01.01.02.01.01.01.02.0
Exenatide 10 µg53.066.077.073.00.00.010.013.00.00.048.038.00.00.06.06.00.00.07.06.0

[back to top]

Motion Sickness Assessment Questionnaire (MSAQ) for Assessment of Nausea for Session 1

Participant completed MSAQ to quantify the severity of different dimensions of nausea induced by motion sickness. There were total 16 items: 4 related to gastro-intestinal (GI), 5 related to central (C), 3 related to peripheral (P) and 4 related to sopite-related (SR). All items were scored individually on a scale of 1-9 where 1 means 'not at all severe' and 9 means 'severe', with higher score indicates more severity. Individual 16 items with their scores are presented. NA indicates that data were not available as standard deviation could not be calculated due to low number of participants. (NCT02802514)
Timeframe: Day 1 0.5 hour post-MRI; Day 4 0.5 hour post-MRI; and Day 8 0.5 hour post-MRI

InterventionScores on scale (Mean)
C, Felt faint like, Day1,0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=0,0,2C, Felt lightheaded, Day1,0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=0,0,2C, Felt disoriented, Day1,0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=0,0,2C, Felt dizzy, Day1,0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=0,0,2C, Felt spinning, Day1,0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=0,0,2GI, stomach sick, Day1,0.5hr,Post MRI,n=0,0,2GI, felt queasy, Day1,0.5hr,Post MRI,n=0,0,2GI, nauseated, Day1, 0.5hr,Post MRI,n=0,0,2GI, may vomit, Day1,0.5hr,Post MRI,n=0,0,2P, sweaty, Day1,0.5hr,Post MRI,n=0,0,2P, clammy/cold sweat,Day1,0.5hr,Post MRI,n=0,0,2P, hot/warm, Day1,0.5hr,Post MRI,n=0, 0, 2SR,annoyed/irritated,Day1,0.5hr,Post MRI,n=0,0,2SR, drowsy, Day1,0.5hr,Post MRI,n=0,0,2SR, tired/fatigued, Day1,0.5hr,Post MRI,n=0,0,2SR, uneasy, Day1,0.5hr,Post MRI,n=0,0,2
Off-therapy MRI4.05.54.58.05.55.06.56.56.54.54.52.55.01.01.58.0

[back to top]

Motion Sickness Assessment Questionnaire (MSAQ) for Assessment of Nausea for Session 1

Participant completed MSAQ to quantify the severity of different dimensions of nausea induced by motion sickness. There were total 16 items: 4 related to gastro-intestinal (GI), 5 related to central (C), 3 related to peripheral (P) and 4 related to sopite-related (SR). All items were scored individually on a scale of 1-9 where 1 means 'not at all severe' and 9 means 'severe', with higher score indicates more severity. Individual 16 items with their scores are presented. NA indicates that data were not available as standard deviation could not be calculated due to low number of participants. (NCT02802514)
Timeframe: Day 1 0.5 hour post-MRI; Day 4 0.5 hour post-MRI; and Day 8 0.5 hour post-MRI

,
InterventionScores on scale (Mean)
C, Felt faint like, Day4,0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0C, Felt faint like, Day8, 0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0C, Felt lightheaded, Day4,0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0C, Felt lightheaded, Day8, 0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0C, Felt disoriented, Day4, 0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0C, Felt disoriented, Day8, 0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0C, Felt dizzy, Day4,0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0C, Felt dizzy, Day8,0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0C, Felt spinning, Day4,0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0C, Felt spinning, Day8, 0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0GI, stomach sick, Day4,0.5hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0GI, stomach sick, Day8,0.5hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0GI, felt queasy, Day4,0.5hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0GI, felt queasy, Day8,0.5hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0GI, nauseated, Day4,0.5hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0GI, nauseated, Day8,0.5hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0GI, may vomit, Day4,0.5hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0GI, may vomit, Day8,0.5hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0P, sweaty, Day4,0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0P, sweaty, Day8, 0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0P,clammy/cold sweat,Day4,0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0P, clammy/cold sweat,Day8,0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0P, hot/warm, Day4,0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0P, hot/warm, Day8, 0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0SR,annoyed/irritated,Day4,0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0SR,annoyed/irritated,Day8, 0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0SR, drowsy, Day4, 0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0SR, drowsy, Day8, 0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0SR, tired/fatigued, Day4,0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0SR, tired/fatigued, Day8,0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0SR, uneasy, Day4, 0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0SR, uneasy, Day8,0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0
Albiglutide 50 mg1.02.02.01.03.01.02.01.01.01.01.01.04.01.03.01.01.01.02.02.03.02.01.01.01.01.05.01.04.01.02.01.0
Exenatide 10 µg1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.02.02.01.02.02.01.01.0

[back to top]

MSAQ for Assessment of Nausea for Session 2

Participant completed MSAQ to quantify the severity of different dimensions of nausea induced by motion sickness. There were total 16 items: 4 related to gastro-intestinal (GI), 5 related to central (C), 3 related to peripheral (P) and 4 related to sopite-related (SR). All items were scored individually on a scale of 1-9 where 1 means 'not at all severe' and 9 means 'severe', with higher score indicates more severity. Individual 16 items with their scores are presented. NA indicates that data were not available as standard deviation could not be calculated due to low number of participants. (NCT02802514)
Timeframe: Day 1 0.5 hour post-MRI; Day 4 0.5 hour post-MRI; and Day 8 0.5 hour post-MRI

InterventionScores on scale (Mean)
C, Felt faint like, Day1,0.5 hr Post MRI ,n=0,0,2C, Felt lightheaded, Day1,0.5 hr Post MRI,n=0,0,2C, Felt disoriented, Day1,0.5 hr, Post MRI,n=0,0,2C, Felt dizzy, Day1, 0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=0,0,2C, Felt spinning, Day1,0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=0,0,2GI, stomach sick, Day1,0.5hr,Post MRI, n=0,0,2GI, felt queasy, Day1, 0.5hr post-MRI,n=0,0,2GI, nauseated, Day1,0.5hr,Post MRI,n=0,0,2GI, may vomit, Day1,0.5hr,Post MRI,n=0,0,2P, sweaty, Day1,0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=0,0,2P,clammy/cold sweat,Day1,0.5hr,post-MRI,n=0,0,2P, hot/warm, Day1,0.5 hr, Post-MRI,n=0,0,2SR,annoyed/irritated,Day1,0.5hr, Post-MRI,n=0,0,2SR, drowsy, Day1, 0.5 hr,Post-MRI,n=0,0,2SR, tired/fatigued, Day1,0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=0,0,2SR, uneasy, Day1, 0.5 hr,Post-MRI,n=0,0,2
Off-therapy MRI3.02.02.02.04.05.04.56.02.01.52.01.01.54.04.54.0

[back to top]

MSAQ for Assessment of Nausea for Session 2

Participant completed MSAQ to quantify the severity of different dimensions of nausea induced by motion sickness. There were total 16 items: 4 related to gastro-intestinal (GI), 5 related to central (C), 3 related to peripheral (P) and 4 related to sopite-related (SR). All items were scored individually on a scale of 1-9 where 1 means 'not at all severe' and 9 means 'severe', with higher score indicates more severity. Individual 16 items with their scores are presented. NA indicates that data were not available as standard deviation could not be calculated due to low number of participants. (NCT02802514)
Timeframe: Day 1 0.5 hour post-MRI; Day 4 0.5 hour post-MRI; and Day 8 0.5 hour post-MRI

,
InterventionScores on scale (Mean)
C, Felt faint like, Day4,0.5 hr Post MRI ,n=1,1,0C, Felt faint like, Day8,0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0C, Felt lightheaded, Day4, 0.5 hr Post MRI,n=1,1,0C, Felt lightheaded, Day8, 0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0C, Felt disoriented, Day4,0.5 hr Post MRI,n=1,1,0C, Felt disoriented, Day8,0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0C, Felt dizzy, Day4,0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0C, Felt dizzy, Day8,0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0C, Felt spinning, Day4,0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0C, Felt spinning, Day8,0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0GI, stomach sick, Day4, 0.5hr post-MRI,n=1,1,0GI, stomach sick, Day8,0.5hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0GI, felt queasy, Day4,0.5hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0GI, felt queasy, Day8, 0.5h,Post MRI,n=1,1,0GI, nauseated, Day4,0.5hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0GI, nauseated, Day8,0.5hr,Post MRI, n=1,1,0GI, may vomit, Day4,0.5hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0GI, may vomit, Day8,0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0P, sweaty, Day4, 0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0P, sweaty, Day8,0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0P, clammy/cold sweat, Day4,0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0P,clammy/cold sweat,Day8,0.5hr,Post-MRI,n=1,1,0P, hot/warm, Day4, 0.5 hr,Post-MRI,n=1,1,0P, hot/warm,Day8, 0.5 hr Post-MRI,n=1,1,0SR,annoyed/irritated,Day4,0.5hr,Post-MRI,n=1,1,0SR,annoyed/irritated,Day8,0.5hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0SR, drowsy, Day4, 0.5 hr,Post-MRI,n=1,1,0SR, drowsy, Day8, 0.5 hr, Post-MRI,n=1,1,0SR, tired/fatigued, Day4,0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0SR, tired/fatigued, Day8,0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0SR, uneasy, Day4, 0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0SR, uneasy, Day8, 0.5 hr,Post MRI,n=1,1,0
Albiglutide 50 mg1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.05.01.04.03.01.01.0
Exenatide 10 µg2.01.02.02.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.02.01.03.01.01.03.01.03.01.01.01.01.01.01.05.01.03.01.01.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Heart Rate for Session 1

Data of participants with abnormal heart rate (measured during site visits by sphygmomanometer) were reported. Participants with low and high heart rate has been presented. Potential clinical concern value for heart rate is < 50 beats per minute to > 120 beats per minute. Safety Population comprised of all participants who received at least one dose of the study treatment. (NCT02802514)
Timeframe: Day 1: pre-MRI, 0.5 hour post-MRI; Day 4: -2 hours pre-MRI, 0.5 and 1 hour post MRI; Day 5; Day 8: -2 hour pre-MRI, 0.5 and 1 hour post-MRI

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Day 4, -2 hr pre-MRI, high, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 4, -2 hr pre-MRI, low, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 4, Post MRI 0.5 hr, high, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 4, 0.5 hr Post MRI, low, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 4, 1 hr Post MRI, high, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 4, 1 hr Post MRI, low, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 8, -2 hr pre-MRI, high, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 8, -2 hr pre-MRI, low, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 8, 0.5 hr Post MRI, high, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 8, 0.5 hr Post MRI, low, n=1, 1, 0, 0
Albiglutide 50 mg0000000000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Heart Rate for Session 1

Data of participants with abnormal heart rate (measured during site visits by sphygmomanometer) were reported. Participants with low and high heart rate has been presented. Potential clinical concern value for heart rate is < 50 beats per minute to > 120 beats per minute. Safety Population comprised of all participants who received at least one dose of the study treatment. (NCT02802514)
Timeframe: Day 1: pre-MRI, 0.5 hour post-MRI; Day 4: -2 hours pre-MRI, 0.5 and 1 hour post MRI; Day 5; Day 8: -2 hour pre-MRI, 0.5 and 1 hour post-MRI

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Day 4, -2 hr pre-MRI, high, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 4, -2 hr pre-MRI, low, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 4, Post MRI 0.5 hr, high, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 4, 0.5 hr Post MRI, low, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 4, 1 hr Post MRI, high, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 4, 1 hr Post MRI, low, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 8, -2 hr pre-MRI, high, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 8, -2 hr pre-MRI, low, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 8, 0.5 hr Post MRI, high, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 8, 0.5 hr Post MRI, low, n=1, 1, 0, 0Day 8, 1 hr Post MRI, high, n=0, 1, 0, 0Day 8, 1 hr Post MRI, low, n=0, 1, 0, 0
Exenatide 10 µg000000000000

[back to top]

Post-quit Craving as Assessed by the Questionnaire of Smoking Urges

Questionnaire of Smoking Urges (QSU) is a 10-item scale (total score range = 10-70, a lower score indicates lower cravings for cigarettes) that evaluates the intention and desire to smoke and anticipation of relief from withdrawal-associated negative affect. (NCT02975297)
Timeframe: 10 weeks (4 weeks after end of treatment)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Exenatide Plus NRT Plus Counseling11.5
Placebo Plus NRT Plus Counseling11.2

[back to top]

Post-quit Craving as Assessed by the Questionnaire of Smoking Urges

Questionnaire of Smoking Urges (QSU) is a 10-item scale (total score range = 10-70, a lower score indicates lower cravings for cigarettes) that evaluates the intention and desire to smoke and anticipation of relief from withdrawal-associated negative affect. (NCT02975297)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Exenatide Plus NRT Plus Counseling17.2
Placebo Plus NRT Plus Counseling16.9

[back to top]

Post-quit Craving as Assessed by the Questionnaire of Smoking Urges

Questionnaire of Smoking Urges (QSU) is a 10-item scale (total score range = 10-70, a lower score indicates lower cravings for cigarettes) that evaluates the intention and desire to smoke and anticipation of relief from withdrawal-associated negative affect. (NCT02975297)
Timeframe: 7 weeks (1 week after end of treatment)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Exenatide Plus NRT Plus Counseling13.3
Placebo Plus NRT Plus Counseling14.2

[back to top]

Withdrawal Symptoms as Assessed by the Wisconsin Smoking Withdrawal Scale

The Wisconsin Smoking Withdrawal Scale is a 28-item questionnaire designed to assess different aspects of the smoking withdrawal syndrome. Participants rate each item on a Likert scale from zero (strongly disagree) to four (strongly agree). Total score ranges from 0 to 112, with a higher score indicating greater withdrawal. (NCT02975297)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Exenatide Plus NRT Plus Counseling40.5
Placebo Plus NRT Plus Counseling44.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Self-Reported Abstinence and Who Were Biochemically Verified as Abstinent Via Expired CO Level of ≤ 5ppm

(NCT02975297)
Timeframe: 7 weeks (1 week after end of treatment)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Exenatide Plus NRT Plus Counseling15
Placebo Plus NRT Plus Counseling7

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Self-Reported Abstinence and Who Were Biochemically Verified as Abstinent Via Expired CO Level of ≤ 5ppm

(NCT02975297)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Exenatide Plus NRT Plus Counseling19
Placebo Plus NRT Plus Counseling11

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Self-Reported Abstinence and Who Were Biochemically Verified as Abstinent Via Expired CO Level of ≤ 5ppm

(NCT02975297)
Timeframe: 10 weeks (4 weeks after end of treatment)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Exenatide Plus NRT Plus Counseling9
Placebo Plus NRT Plus Counseling4

[back to top]

Change in Plasma Insulin Concentration

Measurement of change in plasma insulin concentration from baseline to 16 weeks following treatment with each study drug(s). Placebo arm was not included in this 16 week portion of the study, since subjects are diabetic. Only 3 arms of the study were conducted: (i) Byetta/Bydureon, (ii) Dapagliflozin (iii) Byetta/Bydureon plus Dapagliflozin. (NCT02981069)
Timeframe: Baseline to 16 weeks

InterventionmicroUnits/ml (Mean)
Dapa+Exe-2
Dapa-2
Exenatide3

[back to top]

Change in Endogenous Glucose Production (EGP) After 16 Weeks of Treatment With Each Study Drug.

"After screening, eligible subjects will receive a measurement of endogenous glucose production (EGP) with a prime-continuous infusion of 3-3H-glucose. The EGP measurement will be performed in the morning after a 10-12 hour overnight fast and will last 8.5 hours (from 6 AM to 2:30 PM). After a 3.5-hour tracer equilibration period, subjects (20 per group) will receive one of the following medications: (i) exenatide 5 ug subcutaneously; (ii) dapagliflozin (10 mg); and (iii) dapagliflozin 10 mg + exenatide 5 ug. Only three groups will be followed for 16 weeks since subjects are diabetic and placebo is not appropriate to use for this period. Again, subjects will be randomized to treatment with either exenatide, dapagliflozin or both drugs in combination. Repeat EGP will be measured again at 16 weeks as described above and data will be compared to respective acute studies." (NCT02981069)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionmg/kg.min (Mean)
EXENATIDE-0.23
Dapagliflozin0.20
Exenatide Plus Dapagliflozin-0.12

[back to top]

Change in Endogenous Glucose Production (EGP) After Acute Exposure to a Single Dose and Again After 16 Weeks of Treatment

After screening, eligible subjects will receive a measurement of endogenous glucose production (EGP) with a prime-continuous infusion of 3-3H-glucose. The EGP measurement will be performed in the morning after a 10-12 hour overnight fast and will last 8.5 hours (from 6 AM to 2:30 PM). After a 3.5-hour tracer equilibration period, subjects (20 per group) will receive one of the following medications: (i) placebo; (ii) exenatide 5 ug subcutaneously; (iii) dapagliflozin (10 mg); and (iv) dapagliflozin 10 mg + exenatide 5 ug [ACUTE STUDY]. (NCT02981069)
Timeframe: ACUTE [after a single dose of each study drug or placebo]

Interventionmg/kg.min (Mean)
EXENATIDE-0.18
Dapagliflozin0.14
Exenatide Plus Dapagliflozin-0.08
Placebo-0.03

[back to top]

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Concentration

The change in (FPG) above baseline following administration of study interventions after 16 weeks of treatment with each study drug(s) compared to data obtained during the acute exposure. Placebo arm was not included in this 16 week portion of the study, since subjects are diabetic. Only 3 arms of the study were conducted: (i) Byetta/Bydureon, (ii) Dapagliflozin (iii) Byetta/Bydureon plus Dapagliflozin. (NCT02981069)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Byetta / Bydureon42
Dapagliflozin72
Byetta/Bydureon Plus Dapagliflozin11

[back to top]

Change in Plasma Glucagon Concentration

Measurement of change in plasma glucagon concentration after 16 weeks of treatment with each study drug(s) compared to acute exposure at baseline. Placebo arm was not included in this 16 week portion of the study, since subjects are diabetic. Only 3 arms of the study were conducted: (i) Byetta/Bydureon, (ii) Dapagliflozin (iii) Byetta/Bydureon plus Dapagliflozin. (NCT02981069)
Timeframe: Baseline to 16 weeks

Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
Dapa+Exe4
Dapa5
Exenatide-6

[back to top]

Assessment of Reproductive Function

Changes in testosterone levels were measured (NCT03151005)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionnmol/L (Mean)
Metformin-GLP-1 Receptor Agonist1.82
Metformin-Oral Contraceptive(OC)2.14

[back to top]

Assessment of Liver Function

Alanine transaminase was measured in IU/L. (NCT03151005)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionIU/L (Mean)
Metformin-GLP-1 Receptor Agonist39.09
Metformin-Oral Contraceptive(OC)36.73

[back to top]

Assessment of Blood Pressure

Systolic blood pressure was measured in mmHg. (NCT03151005)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Metformin-GLP-1 Receptor Agonist122.83
Metformin-Oral Contraceptive(OC)122.40

[back to top]

Basic Vital Signs

Weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2. (NCT03151005)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionkg/m^2 (Mean)
Metformin-GLP-1 Receptor Agonist26.26
Metformin-Oral Contraceptive(OC)27.12

[back to top]

Assessment of Reproductive Functions

Concentration of LH was measured in mIU/ml. (NCT03151005)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionmIU/ml (Mean)
Metformin-GLP-1 Receptor Agonist5.52
Metformin-Oral Contraceptive(OC)5.33

[back to top]

Tmax (Time of Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration)

Whole venous blood samples of 3 mL was collected from peripheral vein at each period at pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48 h post-dose of bexagliflozin. A non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was used to calculate the PK parameters. Tmax was obtained directly from experimental observations. (NCT03167411)
Timeframe: Up to 48 hrs

Interventionhours (Median)
Bexagliflozin2.00
Bexagliflozin With Exenatide5.00

[back to top]

T1/2 (Apparent Terminal Elimination Half-life)

Whole venous blood samples of 3 mL was collected from peripheral vein at each period at pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48 h post-dose of bexagliflozin. A non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was used to calculate the PK parameters. T1/2 was calculated as the natural log of 2 divided by the terminal phase rate constant. (NCT03167411)
Timeframe: Up to 48 hrs

Interventionhours (Geometric Mean)
Bexagliflozin12.1
Bexagliflozin With Exenatide8.8

[back to top]

Cmax (Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration)

Whole venous blood samples of 3 mL was collected from peripheral vein at each period at pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48 h post-dose of bexagliflozin. A non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was used to calculate the PK parameters. Cmax was obtained directly from experimental observations. (NCT03167411)
Timeframe: Up to 48 hrs

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Bexagliflozin95.9
Bexagliflozin With Exenatide121.6

[back to top]

AUC0-inf (Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity)

Whole venous blood samples of 3 mL was collected from peripheral vein at each period at pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48 h post-dose of bexagliflozin. A non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was used to calculate the PK parameters. AUC0-inf was calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule, using actual elapsed time values. If the actual time of sample collection was not available, the nominal time was used for the purpose of parameter estimation. (NCT03167411)
Timeframe: Up to 48 hrs

Interventionhr*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Bexagliflozin776.0
Bexagliflozin With Exenatide1085.3

[back to top]

Urinary Glucose Excretion (UGE)

Post-dose urine was collected without preservative in four batches: 0 to 12 h, 12 to 24 h, 24 to 36 h, and 36 to 48 h collections. After collection, the total volume of each batch and collection time was recorded. UGE, including UGE(t1-t2) and total 0-24 h and 0-48 h UGE were calculated. UGE(t1-t2) was derived from urine volume (Vt1-t2) multiplied by glucose concentration divided by 100. (NCT03167411)
Timeframe: 0-48 hours

,
Interventiong (Mean)
Pre-dose (-12 to 0 hours)0 - 12 hours12 - 24 hours24 - 36 hours36 - 48 hours0 - 24 hours0 - 48 hours
Bexagliflozin0.0738.3226.8921.939.5665.2196.70
Bexagliflozin With Exenatide0.0526.3828.9522.169.2155.6588.11

[back to top]

Change in EGP From Baseline to Post-oral Glucose Load.

The difference in rate of EGP during the last hour of the study (from 240-300 minutes) between drug-treatment and placebo treatment studies represents the effect of drug treatment on EGP, which will be compared among the 3 acute drug treatments (exenatide; dapagliflozin; exenatide plus dapagliflozin this data includes change in EGP above baseline following dapagliflozin alone vs dapagliflozin/exenatide) with ANOVA. (NCT03331289)
Timeframe: From baseline [-35 to 0min] to the last hour post-glucose load [240-300 minutes]

Interventionmg/kg.min (Mean)
Placebo-0.03
Exenatide-0.18
Dapagliflozin0.14
Exenatide and Dapagliflozin-0.08

[back to top]

Alcohol Consumption

Alcohol consumption was measured by using a graduated cylinder to determine the amount of alcohol given to the subject that was not consumed. The amount not consumed was then subtracted from the total amount of alcohol served to the subject in order to calculate the amount consumed. This outcome was measured in standard drink units (SDUs). A standard drink contains approximately 0.6 fluid ounces of pure alcohol. (NCT03645408)
Timeframe: 2 hours

Interventionstandard drink units (SDUs) (Mean)
Exenatide Injection0.93
Sham Injection (Placebo)2.78

[back to top]

Hemoglobin A1c

Hemoglobin is a protein within red blood cells. As glucose enters the bloodstream, it binds to hemoglobin, or glycates. The more glucose that enters the bloodstream, the higher the amount of glycated hemoglobin. An A1C level below 5.7 percent is considered normal. (NCT03961256)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 months after kidney transplantation

,
Interventionpercentage of glycated hemoglobin (Median)
12 months24 months
Exenatide SR Intervention Group5.65.65
Standard of Care5.855.75

[back to top]

Incidence of Mesangial Expansion

Number of subjects to experience mesangial expansion >20%. Mesangial expansion occurs due to increased deposition of extracellular matrix proteins, for example fibronectin, into the mesangium. Accumulation of extracellular matrix proteins then occurs due to insufficient degradation by matrix metalloproteinases. (NCT03961256)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 months after kidney transplantation

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
12 months24 months
Exenatide SR Intervention Group00
Standard of Care00

[back to top]

Creatinine

A creatinine blood test measures the level of creatinine in the blood. Creatinine is a waste product that forms when creatine, which is found in the muscle, breaks down. Creatinine levels in the blood can provide the doctors with information about how well the kidneys are working. As measured in mg/dL units. (NCT03961256)
Timeframe: From enrollment, up to 20 months post-enrollment

Interventionmg/dL (Median)
Exenatide SR Intervention Group1.7
Standard of Care1.4

[back to top]

Graft Loss

The number of subjects to experience graft loss. Primary graft failure is defined as no evidence of engraftment or hematological recovery of donor cells, within the first month after transplant, without evidence of disease relapse. Secondary graft failure refers to the loss of a previously functioning graft, resulting in cytopenia involving at least two blood cell lineages. (NCT03961256)
Timeframe: From enrollment, up to 20 months post-enrollment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Exenatide SR Intervention Group0

[back to top]

Incidence of Death

Number of subjects to experience death by any cause (NCT03961256)
Timeframe: From enrollment, up to 20 months post-enrollment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Exenatide SR Intervention Group0

[back to top]

Progression From Prediabetes to Diabetes

Number of subjects to have an increase in HbA1C or fasting blood sugar to diabetic range based on the American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria after kidney transplantation (NCT03961256)
Timeframe: 12 months after transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Exenatide SR Intervention Group0
Standard of Care1

[back to top]

Adverse Events for Exenatide SR Intervention

Total number of adverse events reported by the subjects that received the Exenatide SR Intervention (NCT03961256)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionAdverse Events (Number)
Exenatide SR Intervention Group10

[back to top]

Progression From Prediabetes to Diabetes

Number of subjects to have an increase in HbA1C or fasting blood sugar to diabetic range based on the American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria after kidney transplantation (NCT03961256)
Timeframe: 24 months after transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Exenatide SR Intervention Group1
Standard of Care1

[back to top]

Clinical Effect of Exenatide as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Self-reported Cocaine Use on 50% or More Days of the Week

Timeline Followback (TLFB) administered once weekly. (NCT04941521)
Timeframe: From Week 1 to Week 6

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
week 1week 2week 3week 4week 5week 6
Exenatide and Drug Counseling221212

[back to top]

Clinical Effect of Exenatide as Indicated by Number of Participants Who Had an Increase in Positive Affect Symptoms by Week 6 as Indicated on the Positive/Negative Affect Schedule

The Positive/Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item questionnaire divided into 10 positive affect items and 10 negative affect items. The score for the positive affect items ranges from 10 to 50, with a higher score indicating higher levels of positive affect. The scores from each timepoint will be plotted as a trend line. (NCT04941521)
Timeframe: From Week 0 to Week 6

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Exenatide and Drug Counseling1

[back to top]

Clinical Effect of Exenatide as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Had a Decrease in Drug Demand by Week 6

Drug demand will be measured by the computerized Cocaine Purchasing Task (CPT). The CPT asks participants how much cocaine they would purchase at the beginning of a hypothetical day as the cost of cocaine increases from $0 to $1,000. The CPT simulates changes in price and consumption of drug in order to assess demand curves associated with drug consumption. The CPT will assess both cocaine reward value as well as motivation to consume cocaine. (NCT04941521)
Timeframe: From Week 0 to Week 6

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Exenatide and Drug Counseling1

[back to top]

Feasibility as Indicated by Overall Acceptability as Reported on the Satisfaction Survey

The Satisfaction Survey includes a 9-point likert scale that ranges from 1 to 9, with a higher score indicating greater acceptability. (NCT04941521)
Timeframe: Week 6

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
treatment helpfulnesstreatment usefulnesslikelihood of treatment recommendationdesire to continue treatment
Exenatide and Drug Counseling7.666.007.337.33

[back to top]

Clinical Effect of Exenatide as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Were Below the Clinical Range for Depression by Week 6 as Indicated by the Beck Depression Inventory

The Beck Depression Inventory score ranges from 0 to 63, with a higher score indicating greater depressive symptoms. The scores from each timepoint will be plotted as a trend line. (NCT04941521)
Timeframe: Week 6

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Exenatide and Drug Counseling3

[back to top]

Clinical Effect of Exenatide as Indicated by Number of Participants Who Had a Decrease in Negative Affect Symptoms Indicated on the Positive/Negative Affect Schedule

The Positive/Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item questionnaire divided into 10 positive affect items and 10 negative affect items. The score for the negative affect items ranges from 10 to 50, with a lower score indicating lower levels of negative affect. The scores from each timepoint will be plotted as a trend line. (NCT04941521)
Timeframe: From Week 0 to Week 6

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Exenatide and Drug Counseling1

[back to top]

Clinical Effect of Exenatide as Indicated by Number of Participants Who Reported a Reduction in Craving by Week 6 as Indicated by Cocaine Craving on the Brief Substance Craving Scale

The brief substance craving scale (BSCS) is a 16-item, self-report instrument that assesses craving for cocaine and other substances of abuse over a 24 hour period. The domains of intensity, frequency, and duration are recorded on a five-point Likert scale. The range of scores for each domain is 0 to 4, and the total score is the sum of all three domains. The total score range is 0 to 12, and higher scores indicate higher craving (worse outcome.) (NCT04941521)
Timeframe: From Week 0 to Week 6

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Exenatide and Drug Counseling2

[back to top]

Drug Safety as Assessed by Total Number of Adverse Events Reported During Treatment

Adverse events (AEs) will be reported to study nurse during the course of treatment. (NCT04941521)
Timeframe: From Week 1 to Week 6

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Exenatide and Drug Counseling7

[back to top]

Feasibility as Assessed by Number of Participants Enrolled

Enrollment will be assessed by the number of participants signing the informed consent. (NCT04941521)
Timeframe: Week 0

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Exenatide and Drug Counseling3

[back to top]

Feasibility as Assessed by Number of Participants Who Completed Treatment

Treatment completion will be assessed by attendance at the end-of-treatment timepoint. (NCT04941521)
Timeframe: Week 6

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Exenatide and Drug Counseling3

[back to top]

Feasibility as Assessed by Number of Study Visits Attended

There were 6 study visits planned. (NCT04941521)
Timeframe: From Week 1 to Week 6

Interventionstudy visits (Mean)
Exenatide and Drug Counseling6

[back to top]

Feasibility as Assessed by Retention as Indicated by Total Number of Completed Study Visits

Retention will be assessed by the total number of completed study visits. A completed study visit is a visit in which the participant attended and received the study treatment. (NCT04941521)
Timeframe: From Week 1 to Week 6

Interventioncompleted study visits (Mean)
Exenatide and Drug Counseling6

[back to top]

Clinical Effect of Exenatide as Assessed by Cocaine Use During Treatment as Indicated by Number of Participants With Cocaine-positive Urine Drug Screen Results

Urine drug screens were performed weekly. For a cocaine-negative urine drug screen result, benzoylecgonine levels must be under 300 ng/mL. (NCT04941521)
Timeframe: From Week 1 to Week 6

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
week 1week 2week 3week 4week 5week 6
Exenatide and Drug Counseling333222

[back to top]