Page last updated: 2024-11-04

diphenhydramine

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

Diphenhydramine: A histamine H1 antagonist used as an antiemetic, antitussive, for dermatoses and pruritus, for hypersensitivity reactions, as a hypnotic, an antiparkinson, and as an ingredient in common cold preparations. It has some undesired antimuscarinic and sedative effects. [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

diphenhydramine : An ether that is the benzhydryl ether of 2-(dimethylamino)ethanol. It is a H1-receptor antagonist used as a antipruritic and antitussive drug. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

antitussive : An agent that suppresses cough. Antitussives have a central or a peripheral action on the cough reflex, or a combination of both. Compare with expectorants, which are considered to increase the volume of secretions in the respiratory tract, so facilitating their removal by ciliary action and coughing, and mucolytics, which decrease the viscosity of mucus, facilitating its removal by ciliary action and expectoration. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID3100
CHEMBL ID657
CHEBI ID4636
SCHEMBL ID4064
MeSH IDM0006508

Synonyms (264)

Synonym
AC-13704
BIDD:GT0152
AB00053460-22
AB00053460-23
BRD-K47278471-003-05-7
2-[di(phenyl)methoxy]-n,n-dimethylethanamine
gtpl1224
dimehydrinate
allergan
KBIO1_000368
DIVK1C_000368
NCI60_002916
NCI60_022782
2-[(diphenylmethyl)oxy]-n,n-dimethylethanamine
benzantin
diphen
allergina
dimedrolum
dibendrin
antitussive
nsc665800
nsc-665800
diphenylhydramine
restamin
rigidyl
benadryl
SPECTRUM_000980
BSPBIO_000249
BSPBIO_002219
antistominum
desentol
ibiodral
2-diphenylmethoxy-n,n-dimethylethylamine
novamina
difenhidramina [inn-spanish]
2-(diphenylmethoxy)-n,n-dimethylethylamine
einecs 200-396-7
diphenhydraminum [inn-latin]
n-(benzhydryloksy-etylo)dwumetyloamina [polish]
dabylen
S51 ,
dylamon
bagodryl
ccris 1959
beta-dimethylamino-aethyl-benzhydryl-aether [german]
nausen
benodin
benylan
difenhydramin
dermodrin
ethylamine, n,n-dimethyl-2-(diphenylmethoxy)-
drylistan
diphenhydramine [inn:ban:jan]
ethylamine, 2-(diphenylmethoxy)-n,n-dimethyl-
benylin
mephadryl
benhydramin
allergical
diphenylhydramin
automin
antomin
benzhydroamina
far 90x2
benzantine
debendrin
benachlor
benodine
hyadrine
brn 1914136
medidryl
beta-dimethylaminoethylbenzhydrylether
pm 255
diabenyl
benadrin
benzhydramine
dimedrol base
benzhydril
amidryl
difenidramina [italian]
diphantine
benzhydraminum
dibondrin
benapon
syntedril
betramin
dermistina
baramine
hsdb 3066
difedryl
diabylen
histaxin
n,n-dimethyl-2-(diphenylmethoxy)-ethylamine hydrochloride
lopac-d-3630
NCGC00015335-02
NCGC00015335-01
cas-147-24-0
alledryl
probedryl
2-(benzhydryloxy)-n,n-dimethylethylamine, hydrochloride
dihidral
benadryl (hydrochloride)
ethanamine, 2-(diphenylmethoxy)-n,n-dimethyl-
2-benzhydryloxy-n,n-dimethyl-ethanamine
PRESTWICK2_000065
SPECTRUM5_000915
IDI1_000368
PRESTWICK3_000065
LOPAC0_000377
BPBIO1_000275
2-(diphenylmethoxy)-n,n-dimethylethanamine
STK103720
AB00053460
diphenhydramine
C06960
58-73-1
beta-dimethylaminoethyl benzhydryl ether
2-(benzhydryloxy)-n,n-dimethylethylamine
o-benzhydryldimethylaminoethanol
alpha-(2-dimethylaminoethoxy)diphenylmethane
n-(2-(diphenylmethoxy)ethyl)-n,n-dimethylamine
beta-dimethylaminoethanol diphenylmethyl ether
DB01075
2-diphenylmethoxy-n,n-demthylethanamine
restamin (tn)
D00300
n-[2-(benzhydryloxy)ethyl]-n,n-dimethylamine
2-benzhydryloxyethyl-n,n-dimethylammonium
diphenhydramine (jp17/inn)
2PM ,
NCGC00024414-04
KBIOGR_001099
KBIO3_001439
KBIO2_001460
KBIO2_006596
KBIOSS_001460
KBIO2_004028
PRESTWICK1_000065
NINDS_000368
SPECTRUM3_000400
SPBIO_002170
SPECTRUM2_000961
PRESTWICK0_000065
SPBIO_000961
SPECTRUM4_000520
OPREA1_254625
NCGC00015335-03
NCGC00024414-03
HMS2089E06
NCGC00015335-10
CHEMBL657 ,
diphenhdyra
difenhidramina
CHEBI:4636 ,
diphenhydraminum
MLS002222276
L000227
smr001307259
2-benzhydryloxy-n,n-dimethylethanamine
bdbm50017674
2-(benzhydryloxy)-n,n-dimethylethanamine
(2-benzhydryloxy-ethyl)-dimethyl-amine
NCGC00015335-07
A831996
AKOS003658554
NCGC00024414-06
dtxsid4022949 ,
cas-58-73-1
tox21_110127
dtxcid802949
CCG-204472
HMS2230L19
NCGC00015335-11
NCGC00015335-13
NCGC00015335-06
NCGC00015335-14
NCGC00015335-05
NCGC00015335-08
NCGC00015335-12
NCGC00015335-09
NCGC00015335-04
[2-(diphenylmethoxy)ethyl]dimethylamine
dryistan
dimedryl
allergan b
allergeval
syntodril
rigidil
aleryl
ben-allergin
benzhydryl
ec 200-396-7
difenidramina
unii-8gts82s83m
8gts82s83m ,
beta-dimethylamino-aethyl-benzhydryl-aether
n-(benzhydryloksy-etylo)dwumetyloamina
FT-0625221
orphenadrine impurity d
diphenhydramine [inn]
diphenhydramine [mart.]
diphenhydramine [jan]
diphenhydramine [mi]
diphenhdyra [vandf]
orphenadrine citrate impurity d [ep impurity]
diphenhydramine [vandf]
diphenhydramine [who-dd]
diphenhydramine [hsdb]
HMS3373E03
SCHEMBL4064
NCGC00015335-17
tox21_110127_1
allergan (salt/mix)
n,n-dimethyl-2-diphenylmethyloxyethylamine
.beta.-(dimethylamino)ethanol diphenylmethyl ether
n-[2-(diphenylmethoxy)ethyl]-n,n-dimethylamine
.alpha.-(2-dimethylaminoethoxy)diphenylmethane
.beta.-(dimethylamino)ethyl benzhydryl ether
2-(benzhydryloxy)-n,n-dimethylethanamine #
eldadryl (salt/mix)
ethylamine, 2-diphenylmethoxy-n,n-dimethyl-
s 51
histacyl (salt/mix)
2-(benzohydryloxy)-n,n-dimethylethylamine
o-benzhydryl(dimethylamino)ethanol
antitussive (salt/mix)
diphenylmethanol, (n,n-dimenthylaminoethyl) ether
restamin (salt/mix)
.beta.-dimethylamino-aethyl-benzhydryl-aether
Q-201002
cambridge id 6699980
AB00053460_24
AB00053460_25
mfcd00274173
GS-3196
dimethylamine benzhydryl ester
dobacen
difenhydramine
F19220
SBI-0050365.P004
diphenydramine
diphenhydramine; antistominum; benzhydramine
Q413486
2-[(phenyl-4-d)(phenyl)methoxy]-n,n-dimethylethanamine
mfcd31699960
2122800-18-2
SY246339
110491-04-8
D4744
BRD-K47278471-003-15-6
SDCCGSBI-0050365.P005
NCGC00015335-28
58-73-1 (free base)
benadryl; benzhydramine; alledryl; probedryl;
CS-0013574
HY-B0303
EN300-7422367
difenhidramina (inn-spanish)
thaobrate de diphanhydramine
d04aa32
diphenhydramine (mart.)
r06aa02
diacafylline diphanhydramine
diphenhydraminum (inn-latin)
SY053190

Research Excerpts

Overview

Diphenhydramine is an H1 receptor antagonist used to control urticaria and other allergic signs caused by type I hypersensitivity reactions in horses (Equus caballus) It is a moderately lipophilic antihistamine with sodium channel blockade properties.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Diphenhydramine is an H1 receptor antagonist used to control urticaria and other allergic signs caused by type I hypersensitivity reactions in horses (Equus caballus). "( Pharmacokinetics of diphenhydramine following single-dose intravenous and oral administration in non-fasted adult horses.
Christensen, JM; Redmond, JS; Schlipf, JW; Stang, BV, 2022
)
2.49
"Diphenhydramine (DPH) is a pharmaceutical with multiple modes of action, primarily designed as an antihistamine therapeutic drug. "( Integrated biomarker response in signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus exposed to diphenhydramine.
Bořík, A; Kouba, A; Koubová, A; Van Nguyen, T; Velíšek, J; Žlábek, V, 2022
)
2.39
"Diphenhydramine is an antihistamine drug widely used to alleviate symptoms caused by allergies and the common cold. "( An unusual case of fatal hypothermia involving topical diphenhydramine.
Fujishiro, M; Hashimoto, M; Kusano, M; Matsuyama, TA; Nakauchi, A; Narita, SI; Ng, MJ; Sato, K; Tachi, Y; Yoshida, R, 2023
)
2.6
"Diphenhydramine (DPH) is an over-the-counter antihistamine medication commonly used for symptom management in palliative care. "( Diphenhydramine Use Disorder and Complicated Withdrawal in a Palliative Care Patient.
Dai, T; Nolen, A, 2020
)
3.44
"Diphenhydramine is a widely used first-generation histamine (H"( Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation After Diphenhydramine Ingestion.
Erkonen, G; Greene, S; Labarinas, S; Meulmester, K; Thomas, J; Virk, M, 2018
)
2.18
"Diphenhydramine (DPH) is a first-generation antihistamine, which is useful in treating allergic reaction, and is usually considered innocuous. "( Diphenhydramine dependence through deep intramuscular injection resulting in myonecrosis and prolonged QT interval.
Chang, CC; Chen, CY; Chen, TY; Kuo, SC; Lin, TP; Yeh, YW, 2014
)
3.29
"Diphenhydramine is a moderately lipophilic antihistamine with sodium channel blockade properties. "( Intravenous Lipid Emulsion Therapy for Severe Diphenhydramine Toxicity: A Randomized, Controlled Pilot Study in a Swine Model.
Bebarta, VS; Boudreau, SM; Castaneda, M; Vargas, TE; Varney, SM; Zarzabal, LA, 2016
)
2.14
"Diphenhydramine is a well known H1-receptor antagonist that plays a major role in clinical practice. "( Open channel block of NMDA receptors by diphenhydramine.
Adolph, O; Föhr, KJ; Georgieff, M; Köster, S; Zeller, K, 2015
)
2.13
"Diphenhydramine is an antihistamine with previously demonstrated analgesic and antiemetic properties. "( Dose-ranging effect of systemic diphenhydramine on postoperative quality of recovery after ambulatory laparoscopic surgery: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, clinical trial.
Bialek, J; De Oliveira, GS; Marcus, RJ; McCarthy, R, 2016
)
2.16
"Diphenhydramine (DPH) is an H1 histamine receptor antagonist and a relatively safe drug."( Diphenhydramine induces melanoma cell apoptosis by suppressing STAT3/MCL-1 survival signaling and retards B16-F10 melanoma growth in vivo.
Chang, CC; Ho, C; Lee, WC; Or, CR; Su, HL; Yang, SY, 2016
)
2.6
"Diphenhydramine is a very useful alternative in lidocaine-intolerant patients for cutaneous procedures including punch and shave biopsies, cyst removals, small elliptical excisions, and wide local excisions."( Injectable Diphenhydramine Used as Anaesthetic for Wide Local Excision With Flap Closure.
Macdonald, J; Pickett, LE,
)
1.96
"Diphenhydramine (DPH) is an over-the-counter medication used in the treatment of allergic symptoms. "( Behavioral and neurochemical effects of cocaine and diphenhydramine combinations in rhesus monkeys.
Andersen, ML; Banks, ML; Howell, LL; Meyer, RC; Murnane, KS, 2009
)
2.05
"Diphenhydramine is an antihistamine with anticholinergic properties, which has been used for the treatment of Parkinson disease (PD) prior to the development of newer agents with better side-effect profiles. "( Diphenhydramine may be useful as a palliative treatment for patients dying with Parkinson's disease and tremors: a case report and discussion.
Gonzalez, F,
)
3.02
"Diphenhydramine is a drug readily available over the counter in the form of capsules, tablets, and syrup used for allergy relief. "( Death of a child from topical diphenhydramine.
Turner, JW, 2009
)
2.08
"Diphenhydramine is an H1 histamine antagonist that is commonly used for allergic reactions, colds and cough, and as a sleep aid. "( Status epilepticus and wide-complex tachycardia secondary to diphenhydramine overdose.
Duque, D; Hoffman, RS; Jang, DH; Manini, AF; Nelson, LS; Nestor, NB; Trueger, NS, 2010
)
2.04
"Diphenhydramine is a widely used agent for the treatment of urticarial pruritus."( Efficacy of intramuscular nalbuphine versus diphenhydramine for the prevention of epidural morphine-induced pruritus after cesarean delivery.
Chang, CS; Chang, YL; Liao, CC; Sheen, MJ; Tsai, SC; Tseng, CH; Wong, SY,
)
1.11
"Diphenhydramine is an antihistamine commonly implicated in overdose. "( Wide complex tachycardia in a pediatric diphenhydramine overdose treated with sodium bicarbonate.
Cole, JB; Gross, EA; Smith, SW; Stellpflug, SJ, 2011
)
2.08
"Diphenhydramine toxicity is a common poisoning in children. "( Wide complex tachycardia in a pediatric diphenhydramine overdose treated with sodium bicarbonate.
Cole, JB; Gross, EA; Smith, SW; Stellpflug, SJ, 2011
)
2.08
"Diphenhydramine (DPH) is a common over the counter antihistamine that produces drowsiness and has the potential to cause driving under the influence of drugs-related accidents. "( Immunoassay screening of diphenhydramine (Benadryl®) in urine and blood using a newly developed assay.
Castro, C; Catbagan, P; Moore, C; Rodrigues, WC; Wang, G, 2012
)
2.13
"Diphenhydramine is an antihistamine available in numerous over-the-counter preparations. "( Fatal diphenhydramine intoxication in infants.
Baker, AM; Hearn, WL; Johnson, DG; Levine, B; Levisky, JA; Moore, KA; Nelson, SJ, 2003
)
2.24
"Diphenhydramine (Benadryl) is a popular over-the-counter antihistaminic medication used for the treatment of allergies. "( Combination of LC/TOF-MS and LC/Ion trap MS/MS for the identification of diphenhydramine in sediment samples.
Ferrer, I; Heine, CE; Thurman, EM, 2004
)
2
"Diphenhydramine is a histamine-1 receptor antagonist of ethanolamine origin with anticholinergic, sedative, antivertigo, antiemetic, antidyskinetic, and local anesthetic properties. "( Prolonged QT interval with markedly abnormal ventricular repolarization in diphenhydramine overdose.
Khan, IA; Sype, JW, 2005
)
2
"Diphenhydramine is a widely used antihistaminic that is frequently included in over-the-counter medications. "( Paradoxical excitation on diphenhydramine may be associated with being a CYP2D6 ultrarapid metabolizer: three case reports.
de Leon, J; Nikoloff, DM, 2008
)
2.09
"Diphenhydramine is an H1 histamine receptor antagonist, yet it also has a clinically useful local anesthetic effect. "( Inhibition of Na(+) current by diphenhydramine and other diphenyl compounds: molecular determinants of selective binding to the inactivated channels.
Huang, RC; Kuo, CC; Lou, BS, 2000
)
2.04
"Diphenhydramine hydrochloride is a commonly prescribed medicine in hospitalized patients, but its adverse effects on older patients remain unclear."( Cognitive and other adverse effects of diphenhydramine use in hospitalized older patients.
Agostini, JV; Inouye, SK; Leo-Summers, LS, 2001
)
2.02
"Diphenhydramine (DPH) is a commonly reported overdose that shares similar toxicities with other agents. "( Physostigmine, sodium bicarbonate, or hypertonic saline to treat diphenhydramine toxicity.
Engebretsen, KM; Harris, CR; Holger, JS, 2002
)
2
"Diphenhydramine is an adequate alternative of local anesthetics in patients with history of hypersensitivity to local anesthetics."( [Diphenhydramine is useful in a parturient with hypersensitivity to local anesthetics to manage her delivery].
Hiruta, M; Horikawa, Y; Kawakami, T; Mitsuhata, H; Saito, J; Seo, N, 2002
)
1.95
"Diphenhydramine hydrochloride is an antihistamine with anticholinergic properties that is frequently used both orally and topically for the temporary relief of pruritus. "( Diphenhydramine toxicity in three children with varicella-zoster infection.
Chan, CY; Wallander, KA, 1991
)
3.17

Effects

Diphenhydramine has been in medical use for 35 years as an antihistamine and hypnotic. It has multiple modes of action (MOA) targeting the histamine H1, acetylcholine (ACh), and 5-HT reuptake transporter receptors. It is used in hundreds of pharmaceutical formulations.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Diphenhydramine (DPH) has been broadly used to treat allergy. "( Voltage-dependent modulation of TRPA1 currents by diphenhydramine.
Jian, Z; Lin, Y; Shen, X; Sreekrishna, K; Tian, J; Wang, Q; Zhu, MX, 2020
)
2.25
"Diphenhydramine has not been previously identified as a medication likely to form a pharmacobezoar and has not been shown to be radiopaque."( Adolescent with prolonged toxidrome.
Banner, W; Johnson, J; Williams, K, 2017
)
1.18
"Diphenhydramine (DPH) has been used with ibuprofen (IBU) or naproxen (NAP) in combined therapies to provide better clinical efficacy as an analgesic and sleep aid. "( Preparation, Characterization, and Formulation Development of Drug-Drug Protic Ionic Liquids of Diphenhydramine with Ibuprofen and Naproxen.
Chopade, SA; Early, JT; Guo, Y; Hillmyer, MA; Lodge, TP; Sun, CC; Tang, B; Wang, C; Wang, E, 2018
)
2.14
"Diphenhydramine has multiple modes of action (MOA) targeting the histamine H1, acetylcholine (ACh), and 5-HT reuptake transporter receptors, and as such is used in hundreds of pharmaceutical formulations."( Effects of the antihistamine diphenhydramine on selected aquatic organisms.
Berninger, JP; Brooks, BW; Chambliss, CK; Connors, KA; Du, B; Eytcheson, SA; Kolkmeier, MA; Prosser, KN; Valenti, TW, 2011
)
1.38
"Diphenhydramine also has sodium channel-blocking properties, and this can be shown in the form of prolonged QRS and a terminal R wave in aVR."( Wide complex tachycardia in a pediatric diphenhydramine overdose treated with sodium bicarbonate.
Cole, JB; Gross, EA; Smith, SW; Stellpflug, SJ, 2011
)
1.36
"Diphenhydramine has local anaesthetic and antimicrobial activity and may be used to prevent intravenous propofol injection pain. "( The preventive effect of diphenhydramine on bacterial growth in propofol: a laboratory study.
Apiliogullari, B; Apiliogullari, S; Balasar, M; Duman, A; Güzelant, A; Kara, I; Turhan, V; Yilmaz, H, 2008
)
2.09
"Diphenhydramine has shown to be useful in treating acute extrapyramidal disturbances when used intravenously followed by oral administration."( [Acute-onset extrapyramidal syndromes caused by drugs].
Baca Rodríguez, LC; Hernández Zamora, A; Juárez Aragón, G; López Martín, G; Montoya Cabrera, MA; Porcayo Vergara, F,
)
0.85
"Diphenhydramine has been in medical use for 35 years as an antihistamine and hypnotic. "( Quantitative determination of diphenhydramine and orphenadrine in human serum by capillary gas chromatography.
Gielsdorf, W; Jaeger, H; Lutz, D, 1983
)
2
"Diphenhydramine has been suggested as an alternative local anesthetic agent for patients claiming allergy to local anesthetics. "( Local anesthetic efficacy for oral surgery: Comparison of diphenhydramine and prilocaine.
Guler, N; Sumer, M; Uckan, S; Ungor, M, 1998
)
1.99

Actions

Diphenhydramine did not cause clinically appreciable sedation in healthy dogs. DiphenHydramine may produce transient fetal tachycardia as well as increased maternal uterine activity.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Diphenhydramine may produce transient fetal tachycardia as well as increased maternal uterine activity."( Transient Fetal Tachycardia After Intravenous Diphenhydramine Administration.
Abernathy, A; Alsina, L; Egerman, R; Greer, J, 2017
)
2.16
"Diphenhydramine overdose may cause status epilepticus and wide-complex tachycardia. "( Status epilepticus and wide-complex tachycardia secondary to diphenhydramine overdose.
Duque, D; Hoffman, RS; Jang, DH; Manini, AF; Nelson, LS; Nestor, NB; Trueger, NS, 2010
)
2.04
"Diphenhydramine did not cause clinically appreciable sedation in healthy dogs. "( Evaluation of diphenhydramine as a sedative for dogs.
Egger, CM; Hofmeister, EH, 2005
)
2.13
"Diphenhydramine appears to cause mild inhibition of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 enzyme."( Paradoxical excitation on diphenhydramine may be associated with being a CYP2D6 ultrarapid metabolizer: three case reports.
de Leon, J; Nikoloff, DM, 2008
)
1.37
"Diphenhydramine was used because of its possible antiemetic properties and its ability to control acute dystonic reactions."( Improved control of cisplatin-induced emesis with high-dose metoclopramide and with combinations of metoclopramide, dexamethasone, and diphenhydramine. Results of consecutive trials in 255 patients.
Bosl, GJ; Clark, RA; Gralla, RJ; Groshen, S; Kalman, LA; Kelsen, DP; Kris, MG; Reilly, LK; Tyson, LB, 1985
)
1.19

Treatment

Pretreatment with diphenhydramine (5 x 10(-7) on aortic rings from 12 and 52-week age matched rats resulted in qualitatively similar histamine dose-response curves that were displaced about two orders of magnitude to the right. DiphenHydramine treatment also reduced the severity of CRBD at 6 h postoperatively.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Diphenhydramine treatment also reduced the severity of CRBD at 6 h postoperatively (p = 0.01)."( Prophylactic diphenhydramine attenuates postoperative catheter-related bladder discomfort in patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery: a randomized double-blind clinical study.
Chen, JY; Chu, CC; Feng, PH; Hsing, CH; Li, YY; Wang, JJ; Wang, KF; Wu, WJ; Zeng, YS, 2020
)
1.65
"Diphenhydramine is often the treatment of choice for acute urticarial or allergic reactions despite its adverse effects of sedation and impairment. "( Time-dependent inhibition of histamine-induced cutaneous responses by oral and intramuscular diphenhydramine and oral fexofenadine.
Casale, TB; Jones, DH; Romero, FA, 2008
)
2.01
"Diphenhydramine pretreatment (100 mumol/kg i.v.) did not antagonize the hypotensive effect of cimetidine."( Peripheral hypotensive and central hypertensive effects of cimetidine.
Karppanen, H; Kupari, M; Paakkari, I; Paakkari, P; Tötterman, KJ, 1982
)
0.99
"Diphenhydramine treatment alone partially inhibited the histologic intensity of LPR in a dose-dependent manner."( The biologic activity of mast cell granules. V. The effects of antihistamine treatment on rat cutaneous early- and late-phase allergic reactions.
Barr, L; Guthman, DA; Kaliner, M; Lemanske, RF, 1983
)
0.99
"Diphenhydramine pretreatment inhibited fragment D-enhanced aggregation, ATP release and prostaglandin (thromboxane) synthesis."( The role of platelet aggregation and release in fragment D-induced pulmonary dysfunction.
Curreri, PW; Manwaring, D, 1980
)
0.98
"Diphenhydramine treatment after development of the contraction did not relax the airway tissue."( In vitro studies of antigen-induced bronchospasm: effect of antihistamine and SRS-A antagonist on response of sensitized guinea pig and human airways to antigen.
Adams, GK; Lichtenstein, L, 1979
)
0.98
"Oral diphenhydramine treatment at doses which significantly reduced maternal food consumption had no effect on milk solid, lipid, protein, or lactose concentrations, nor on mammary gland RNA or DNA content, indicating that diphenhydramine did not adversely affect lactation."( Determination of diphenhydramine in rat milk and plasma and its effects on milk composition and mammary gland nucleic acids.
Dostal, LA; Schwetz, BA, 1989
)
1.07
"Treatment with diphenhydramine did not reduce the incidence of akathisia compared to treatment with placebo (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.43-1.61, I"( Adjuvant anticholinergic therapy for the prevention of akathisia in patients with primary headache in the emergency department: A systematic review.
Campbell, S; Kirkland, SW; Meyer, J; Rowe, BH; Villa-Roel, C, 2023
)
1.25
"Pretreatment with diphenhydramine (1 microM) markedly decreased antigen-challenged vasoconstriction."( Involvement of CGRP in the inhibitory effect of rutaecarpine on vasoconstriction induced by anaphylaxis in guinea pig.
Deng, PY; Hu, CP; Li, YJ; Tan, GS; Xu, KP; Yu, J, 2005
)
0.65
"Treatment with diphenhydramine significantly decreased the blood cTnI levels. "( Effect of diphenhydramine on myocardial injury caused by organophosphate poisoning.
Buyukokuroglu, M; Ciftci, IH; Saglam, H; Sahin, O; Yavuz, Y; Yurumez, Y, 2008
)
1.1
"Treatment with diphenhydramine completely prevented the increases in lymph flow, lymph total protein concentration, total protein transport, weight and vasodilation produced by infusions of histamine, but not those produced by infusions of prostaglandin E1 or bradykinin."( Pharmacological modification of the edema produced by combined infusions of prostaglandin E1 and bradykinin in canine forelimbs.
Adamski, SW; Grega, GJ; Prasad, CM; Svensjö, E, 1982
)
0.6
"Pretreatment with diphenhydramine/methysergide in compound 48/80-pretreated mice significantly further reduced the bradykinin- and substance P-induced plasma exudation if [Thi5,8,D-Phe7]bradykinin and [D-Pro2,D-Trp7,9]substance P were coinjected with bradykinin or substance P, respectively."( Inhibition of hind-paw edema and cutaneous vascular plasma extravasation in mice by acetylshikonin.
Chang, LC; Kuo, SC; Raung, SL; Wang, JP, 1995
)
0.61
"Pretreatment with diphenhydramine or methysergide significantly reduced trimucase-induced paw swelling, while aspirin had no effect."( Comparison of kinin-forming and amidolytic activities of four trimucases, oedema-producing and kinin-releasing enzymes, from Trimeresurus mucrosquamatus venom.
Hsu, MF; Teng, CM; Wang, JP, 1992
)
0.61
"Treatment with diphenhydramine alone produced similar results except that there was a gradual blood pressure decrease later in shock."( The effects of H1 and H2 histamine receptor antagonists on the development of endotoxemia in the conscious, unrestrained rat.
Brackett, DJ; Schaefer, CF; Wilson, MF, 1985
)
0.61
"Treatment with diphenhydramine or isoproterenol completely inhibited the antigen-stimulated formation of venular FITC-D leakage sites and increases in [FITC-D]s."( Modulation of macromolecular permeability by immune-complexes and a beta-adrenoceptor stimulant.
Adamski, SW; Grega, GJ; Langone, JJ, 1987
)
0.61
"Pretreatment with diphenhydramine (5 x 10(-7)) on aortic rings from 12 and 52-week age matched rats resulted in qualitatively similar histamine dose-response curves that were displaced about two orders of magnitude to the right, indicative of H1 receptor competitive antagonism."( Histamine relaxation of aortic rings from diabetic rats.
Chang, KS; Tanz, RD; Weller, TS, 1989
)
0.6
"Pretreatment with diphenhydramine, BW-755C and kadsurenone (or alprazolam) improved survival to 64% (i.e., 7 of 11 animals) compared to a survival rate of 0% (i.e., 0 of 8 vehicle treated controls)."( Inhibition of the platelet activating factor mediated component of guinea pig anaphylaxis by receptor antagonists.
Darius, H; Lefer, AM; Smith, JB, 1986
)
0.59

Toxicity

Diphenhydramine hydrochloride is a commonly prescribed medicine in hospitalized patients, but its adverse effects on older patients remain unclear. Other agents commonly used at sea-level such as eszopiclone and diphenHydramine have not been studied at high altitude.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Pyridoxine is considered safe for use during pregnancy, but its efficacy in treating nausea and vomiting has not been determined."( Safety and efficacy of antiemetics used to treat nausea and vomiting in pregnancy.
Leathem, AM, 1986
)
0.27
"The toxic effects of oral diphenhydramine are well documented and include central nervous system and anticholinergic symptomatology."( Topical diphenhydramine toxicity in a five year old with varicella.
Baldassano, RN; Woodward, GA, 1988
)
1.01
" Before studying the efficacy of MCP as an antiemetic in children, we first had to establish the safe dose range."( Metoclopramide: dose-related toxicity and preliminary antiemetic studies in children receiving cancer chemotherapy.
Allen, JC; Gralla, R; Kellick, M; Reilly, L; Young, C, 1985
)
0.27
"Infusion-related adverse events (IRAEs) such as nausea, vomiting, fever, chills, and thrombophlebitis that are associated with amphotericin B therapy often lead clinicians to prescribe a number of adjunctive pretreatment medications in an attempt to reduce the incidence and severity of these events."( Pretreatment regimens for adverse events related to infusion of amphotericin B.
Cleary, JD; Goodwin, SD; Grasela, TH; Taylor, JW; Walawander, CA, 1995
)
0.29
" We report rhabdomyolysis as a rare adverse effect of diphenhydramine toxicity in a 29-year-old man who ingested an unknown quantity of an over-the-counter sleep preparation in a suicide attempt."( Rhabdomyolysis: a rare adverse effect of diphenhydramine overdose.
Caravati, EM; Emadian, SM; Herr, RD, 1996
)
0.81
" The BAD pump was safe and effective in minimizing nausea and vomiting associated with HDC, and thus, eliminated the need for hospitalization for management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting."( Safety and efficacy of a continuous infusion, patient controlled anti-emetic pump to facilitate outpatient administration of high-dose chemotherapy.
Belt, R; Coon, J; Cord, M; Dix, S; Geller, R; Howard, S, 1999
)
0.3
" One patient experienced a life-threatening adverse reaction within minutes of receiving the first dose."( Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin: tolerability and toxicity.
Goram, AL; Richmond, PL, 2001
)
0.31
"Diphenhydramine hydrochloride is a commonly prescribed medicine in hospitalized patients, but its adverse effects on older patients remain unclear."( Cognitive and other adverse effects of diphenhydramine use in hospitalized older patients.
Agostini, JV; Inouye, SK; Leo-Summers, LS, 2001
)
2.02
" A dose-response relationship was demonstrated for most adverse outcomes."( Cognitive and other adverse effects of diphenhydramine use in hospitalized older patients.
Agostini, JV; Inouye, SK; Leo-Summers, LS, 2001
)
0.58
"Diphenhydramine administration in older hospitalized patients is associated with an increased risk of cognitive decline and other adverse effects with a dose-response relationship."( Cognitive and other adverse effects of diphenhydramine use in hospitalized older patients.
Agostini, JV; Inouye, SK; Leo-Summers, LS, 2001
)
2.02
" Although physostigmine is considered an acceptable antidote for severe DPH toxicity, adverse effects such as seizures and cholinergic crisis may occur."( Physostigmine, sodium bicarbonate, or hypertonic saline to treat diphenhydramine toxicity.
Engebretsen, KM; Harris, CR; Holger, JS, 2002
)
0.55
" Adverse events with grade 3 or above hematologic toxicity were oligochromemia (M: 24."( [Paclitaxel plus carboplatin in ovarian cancer-comparison of adverse effects between monthly and weekly administration].
Fujii, T; Komatsu, M; Kumagai, M; Kusuda, T; Naitou, H; Shinkou, S; Takehara, K, 2004
)
0.32
" Emetic episodes, doses of rescue medications to treat breakthrough nausea or vomiting, and occurrence of adverse events were recorded."( Safety and efficacy of a continuous infusion, patient-controlled antiemetic pump for children receiving emetogenic chemotherapy.
Cartwright, J; Frangoul, H; Ho, RH; Jones, E; Koyama, T; Kuttesch, J; Shankar, S; Whitlock, JA, 2007
)
0.34
"Antihistamines have traditionally been regarded as safe over the counter sedative-hypnotics."( Rare complications of diphenhydramine toxicity.
Ramachandran, K; Sirop, P, 2008
)
0.66
" Other agents commonly used at sea-level such as eszopiclone and diphenhydramine have not been studied at high altitude but are likely safe to use given their mechanism of action and known side effects."( Which medications are safe and effective for improving sleep at high altitude?
Luks, AM, 2008
)
0.58
"The FDA's adverse event reporting system, AERS, with optimized data mining tools is useful to authorize potential associations between platinum agents and hypersensitivity reactions."( Platinum agent-induced hypersensitivity reactions: data mining of the public version of the FDA adverse event reporting system, AERS.
Kadoyama, K; Niijima, S; Okuno, Y; Sakaeda, T; Seki, K; Shiraishi, Y; Yabuuchi, H, 2011
)
0.37
"57% of patients having complications (52 patients having 60 adverse events)."( Safety of intravenous sedation administered by the operating oral surgeon: the second 7 years of office practice.
Rodgers, MS; Rodgers, SF, 2011
)
0.37
"Metoclopramide is commonly used to treat vomiting caused by seasickness and acute gastroenteritis on cruise ships and serious adverse effects have not been reported from use at sea."( Long-lasting adverse effects after short-term low-dose treatment with metoclopramide for vomiting.
Dahl, E; Diskin, AL, 2014
)
0.4
" A variety of adverse events (AEs) of varying severity have been noted during HPC infusions."( Infusion technique of hematopoietic progenitor cells and related adverse events (CME).
Bryant, SC; Gastineau, DA; Greiner, CW; Hogan, WJ; Jacob, EK; Lingineni, RK; Mohr, A; Mulay, SB; Padley, D, 2014
)
0.4
"Many adverse drug reactions are caused by the cytochrome P450 (CYP)-dependent activation of drugs into reactive metabolites."( Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
Jones, LH; Nadanaciva, S; Rana, P; Will, Y, 2016
)
0.43
" The aim of this study is to provide objective data concerning the safe use of subcutaneous diphenhydramine, as part of our efforts to improve upon safe practices in our organization."( Safe Use of Subcutaneous Diphenhydramine in the Inpatient Hospice Unit.
Chen, A; Cooney, GA; Gonzalez, F; Hickey, T; Levene, R; Loquias, EJ; Roshan, R; Zelhof, R, 2017
)
0.98
" None of the patients were reported to have an adverse cutaneous reaction."( Safe Use of Subcutaneous Diphenhydramine in the Inpatient Hospice Unit.
Chen, A; Cooney, GA; Gonzalez, F; Hickey, T; Levene, R; Loquias, EJ; Roshan, R; Zelhof, R, 2017
)
0.76
"This retrospective review demonstrates that subcutaneous diphenhydramine injection is a safe alternative to oral and other parenteral routes, and may be particularly valuable in terminally ill patients, who are often unable to swallow and are without IV access."( Safe Use of Subcutaneous Diphenhydramine in the Inpatient Hospice Unit.
Chen, A; Cooney, GA; Gonzalez, F; Hickey, T; Levene, R; Loquias, EJ; Roshan, R; Zelhof, R, 2017
)
1
"Though uncommon, medical emergencies in the dental office are harrowing occurrences that can be the result of adverse drug reactions."( Pharmacological Reversal Agents in Dental Practice: Keys to Patient Safety.
Donaldson, M; Goodchild, JH,
)
0.13
"We selected adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports on H1-antihistamines in children (0-16 years) up to June 2014 from VigiBase."( Safety profile of H1-antihistamines in pediatrics: an analysis based on data from VigiBase.
Biagi, C; Calamelli, E; Cipriani, F; Donati, M; Melis, M; Monaco, L; Motola, D; Ricci, G; Vaccheri, A, 2017
)
0.46
" Sediment elutriate exposures were undertaken with Ceriodaphnia dubia to compare the toxic effects of diphenhydramine in the presence and absence of sediment and multi-walled carbon nanotubes."( Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubes Reduce Toxicity of Diphenhydramine to Ceriodaphnia dubia in Water and Sediment Exposures.
Black, MC; Myer, MH, 2017
)
0.92
"Previous research has demonstrated that accidental unsupervised ingestions (AUIs) were responsible for the majority of cough and cold medication (CCM) ingestions leading to significant adverse events (AEs) in children."( Adverse Events Related to Accidental Unintentional Ingestions From Cough and Cold Medications in Children.
Banner, W; Bond, GR; Dart, RC; Green, JL; Kauffman, RE; Palmer, RB; Paul, IM; Rapp-Olsson, M; Reynolds, KM; Wang, GS, 2022
)
0.72
"Initial research following regulatory changes addressing the pediatric safety of cough and cold medications (CCMs) demonstrated decreases in adverse events (AEs)."( Trends in adverse events and related health-care facility utilization from cough and cold medication exposures in children.
Banner, W; Bond, GR; Dart, RC; Green, JL; Kauffman, RE; Palmer, RB; Paul, IM; Rapp-Olsson, M; Reynolds, KM; Wang, GS, 2021
)
0.62
", migraines) in the emergency department, but can cause serious adverse effects."( Prophylactic Administration of Diphenhydramine to Reduce Neuroleptic Side Effects in the Acute Care Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Alain, J; Berthelot, S; Mokhtari, A; Yip, O, 2021
)
0.91
"We performed a systematic review to determine whether prophylactic administration of diphenhydramine reduces the incidence of neuroleptic adverse effects in patients with acute conditions."( Prophylactic Administration of Diphenhydramine to Reduce Neuroleptic Side Effects in the Acute Care Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Alain, J; Berthelot, S; Mokhtari, A; Yip, O, 2021
)
1.13
" Primary outcome was incidence of any extrapyramidal adverse effect."( Prophylactic Administration of Diphenhydramine to Reduce Neuroleptic Side Effects in the Acute Care Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Alain, J; Berthelot, S; Mokhtari, A; Yip, O, 2021
)
0.91
" Four studies were specifically designed to compare the incidence of neuroleptic adverse effects with and without co-administration of diphenhydramine."( Prophylactic Administration of Diphenhydramine to Reduce Neuroleptic Side Effects in the Acute Care Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Alain, J; Berthelot, S; Mokhtari, A; Yip, O, 2021
)
1.11
"When compared with placebo, diphenhydramine was associated with a significant reduction of extrapyramidal adverse effects."( Prophylactic Administration of Diphenhydramine to Reduce Neuroleptic Side Effects in the Acute Care Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Alain, J; Berthelot, S; Mokhtari, A; Yip, O, 2021
)
1.2
" Here, based on a repositioning analysis of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System, we found that a previously developed drug, diphenhydramine, may provide a novel treatment for cisplatin-induced kidney toxicity."( Diphenhydramine may be a preventive medicine against cisplatin-induced kidney toxicity.
Aihara, KI; Chuma, M; Fujino, H; Fukushima, K; Goda, M; Hamano, H; Horinouchi, Y; Ikeda, Y; Imanishi, M; Ishizawa, K; Izawa-Ishizawa, Y; Kishi, S; Miyamoto, L; Niimura, T; Takechi, K; Tamaki, T; Tsuchiya, K; Yamashita, M; Zamami, Y, 2021
)
2.26
"This is an analysis of the multi-center ToxIC registry (2010-2016)."( Clinical and patient characteristics associated with severe outcome in diphenhydramine toxicity.
Hendrickson, RG; Hughes, AR; Lin, A, 2021
)
0.85
" The adverse effects of the compound on rats and beagle dogs mainly included anorexia and liver function impairment."( Evaluation of subchronic toxicity of the compound of diphenhydramine hydrochloride and caffeine after 28 days of repeated oral administration in Sprague-Dawley rats and beagle dogs.
Chen, J; Chen, Y; Dai, X; Gao, F; Geng, B; Gu, J; Li, J; Mao, J; Ren, L; Shi, W; Tian, Y; Wang, H; Yan, L; Zhang, J; Zhang, T; Zhang, X; Zhu, J, 2023
)
1.16
"Injectable diphenhydramine appears to be a safe and effective local anaesthetic alternative in patients with "-caine" class contraindications undergoing radiology procedures."( Safety and technical success of diphenhydramine as an alternative local anaesthetic agent for radiology procedures.
Brinkman, NJ; Hesley, GK; Moynagh, MR; Parvinian, A; Schmitz, JJ; Wagle, S; Xiao, L, 2023
)
1.58
" In a safety assessment, the highest incidence of adverse events (48."( [Comparative study of the clinical efficacy and safety of the fixed dose combination Levroso Long with Melaxen and Diphenhydramine in patients with insomnia].
Leykin, ZN; Popova, VB, 2023
)
1.12

Pharmacokinetics

Oral absorption of diphenhydramine was approximately three times greater with a longer half-life when it was administered as the combination product dimenhydrinate.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The initial distribution half-life increased from 5 to 9 min and the elimination half-life from 34 to 68 min as the dose was increased."( Pharmacokinetics of diphenhydramine after dose ranging in nonpregnant ewes.
Axelson, JE; Kwan, E; Rurak, DW; Yoo, SD, 1990
)
0.6
" The mean serum elimination half-life values for diphenhydramine differed significantly in elderly adults, young adults, and children, with values of 13."( Diphenhydramine: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in elderly adults, young adults, and children.
Chen, XY; Martin, TJ; Simons, FE; Simons, KJ; Watson, WT, 1990
)
1.98
"This article reviews clinical pharmacokinetic data on the H1-receptor antagonists, commonly referred to as the antihistamines."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of H1-receptor antagonists (the antihistamines).
Paton, DM; Webster, DR,
)
0.13
"By the presented study the relative bioavailabilities and some important pharmacokinetic parameters should be evaluated after oral application of a single-dose of three different diphenhydramine (DPH, 2-diphenylmethoxy-N,N-dimethylethylamine)preparations in a randomized, cross-over design to 12 healthy volunteers."( [Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of diphenhydramine in man].
Gielsdorf, W; Graf, F; Lutz, D; Pabst, G, 1986
)
0.73
" Her elimination half-life for desipramine was found to be greatly prolonged, at approximately 150 hours."( Idiosyncratic pharmacokinetics complicating treatment of major depression in an elderly woman.
Dugas, JE; Glassman, JN; Loyd, DW; Tsuang, MT, 1985
)
0.27
"A highly sensitive method (less than or equal to 1 ng/ml) for single-dose pharmacokinetic studies of diphenhydramine which utilizes GLC with nitrogen-phosphorus detection is described."( Diphenhydramine determination in human plasma by gas-liquid chromatography using nitrogen-phosphorus detection: application to single low-dose pharmacokinetic studies.
Abernethy, DR; Greenblatt, DJ, 1983
)
1.92
"The chlorpheniramine and diphenhydramine terminal elimination half-life values and area under the curve values were significantly increased, and the systemic clearance rates were significantly decreased, during concomitant administration of cimetidine."( Effect of cimetidine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of chlorpheniramine and diphenhydramine in rabbits.
Chen, X; Fraser, TG; Simons, FE; Simons, KJ, 1996
)
0.82
"Any enhanced peripheral H1-blockade observed could be attributed, at least in part, to a pharmacokinetic interaction."( Effect of cimetidine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of chlorpheniramine and diphenhydramine in rabbits.
Chen, X; Fraser, TG; Simons, FE; Simons, KJ, 1996
)
0.52
" Pharmacokinetic investigations have shown the drug to be highly bound to blood proteins, mainly serum albumin, and to have a low brain uptake, explaining its lack of sedative effects."( Molecular properties and pharmacokinetic behavior of cetirizine, a zwitterionic H1-receptor antagonist.
Carrupt, PA; Jolliet, P; Morin, C; Morin, D; Pagliara, A; Rihoux, JP; Testa, B; Tillement, JP; Urien, S, 1998
)
0.3
" This dose of diphenhydramine produces essentially undetectable pharmacodynamic effects in both the young and elderly."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of diphenhydramine 25 mg in young and elderly volunteers.
Engelhardt, N; Greenblatt, DJ; Harmatz, JS; Scavone, JM; Shader, RI, 1998
)
0.93
"The present study was conducted to compare the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PD) of paclitaxel between Phase I trials of 3- and 24-h infusions and to determine the most informative pharmacokinetic parameter to describe the PD."( Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of paclitaxel: a 3-hour infusion versus a 24-hour infusion.
Miyata, Y; Nakanomyo, H; Nishiwaki, Y; Ohtsu, T; Saijo, N; Sasaki, Y; Tamura, T, 1995
)
0.29
"The potential for a pharmacokinetic interaction between naproxen and diphenhydramine was examined in a randomized three-way crossover design with a 1-week washout between dosing."( Absence of pharmacokinetic interaction between orally co-administered naproxen sodium and diphenhydramine hydrochloride.
Barker, SH; Gillen, MV; Helsinger, SA; Hunt, TL; Kindberg, CG; Powell, JH; Toothaker, RD, 2000
)
0.76
"This pharmacokinetic study evaluated diphenhydramine in the plasma of healthy volunteers after a single 25 mg oral dose of dimenhydrinate (diphenhydramine theophyllinate), corresponding to 12."( Pharmacokinetics of diphenhydramine in healthy volunteers with a dimenhydrinate 25 mg chewing gum formulation.
Dragoni, S; Frosini, M; Fusi, F; Sgaragli, G; Valoti, M, 2003
)
0.92
" A comparison is also presented between several methods based on animal pharmacokinetic data, using the same set of proprietary compounds, and it lends further support for the use of this method, as opposed to methods that require the gathering of pharmacokinetic data in laboratory animals."( Prediction of human volume of distribution values for neutral and basic drugs. 2. Extended data set and leave-class-out statistics.
Gao, F; Lombardo, F; Obach, RS; Shalaeva, MY, 2004
)
0.32
" Serum APAP concentrations (APAPs) were measured hourly from zero through eight hours and again at 24 hours, and basic noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameters were compared."( Pharmacokinetic effects of diphenhydramine or oxycodone in simulated acetaminophen overdose.
Goklaney, A; Halcomb, SE; Mullins, ME; Sivilotti, ML, 2005
)
0.63
" Furthermore, the over-the-counter antihistamine diphenhydramine inhibited the metabolism of the CYP2D6 substrate metoprolol in healthy, young men with pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic consequences."( Modulation of metoprolol pharmacokinetics and hemodynamics by diphenhydramine coadministration during exercise testing in healthy premenopausal women.
Arsenault, M; Bélanger, PM; Dumesnil, JG; Hamelin, BA; Meibohm, B; Pibarot, P; Pilote, S; Sharma, A, 2005
)
0.82
" The method was successfully applied to pharmacokinetic study of the QAAMC in beagle dogs."( Development and validation of a liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry assay for the simultaneous determination of D-amphetamine and diphenhydramine in beagle dog plasma and its application to a pharmacokinetic study.
Chen, Y; Fan, G; Lin, M; Wang, C; Wu, Y; Zhao, W, 2007
)
0.54
" pharmacokinetic data on 670 drugs representing, to our knowledge, the largest publicly available set of human clinical pharmacokinetic data."( Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
Lombardo, F; Obach, RS; Waters, NJ, 2008
)
0.35
" The most promising compounds of this study show enhanced IC 50 values in the low nanomolar range, a high selectivity toward 17beta-HSD2, a low binding affinity to ERalpha, a good metabolic stability in rat liver microsomes, and a reasonable pharmacokinetic profile after peroral application."( Design, synthesis, biological evaluation and pharmacokinetics of bis(hydroxyphenyl) substituted azoles, thiophenes, benzenes, and aza-benzenes as potent and selective nonsteroidal inhibitors of 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (17beta-HSD1).
Al-Soud, YA; Bey, E; Birk, B; Frotscher, M; Hartmann, RW; Kruchten, P; Marchais-Oberwinkler, S; Negri, M; Oster, A; Werth, R, 2008
)
0.35
"A sensitive, rapid and selective ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric (UPLC-MS/MS) method was developed for the determination and pharmacokinetic study of domperidone in human plasma."( Development and validation of UPLC-MS/MS method for determination of domperidone in human plasma and its pharmacokinetic application.
Jing, L; Li, F; Qin, F; Wang, X; Xiong, Z; Zhu, Q, 2013
)
0.39
" The validated method was successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study in humans."( Determination of tamsulosin in human plasma by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry and its application to a pharmacokinetic study.
Bae, JW; Byeon, JY; Choi, CI; Jang, CG; Lee, HI; Lee, SY; Lee, YJ, 2012
)
0.38
" The results demonstrated that the present LC-MS/MS method was sensitive enough for pharmacokinetic study of stachydrine and leonurine following oral administration of Herba Leonuri extract."( Simultaneous determination and pharmacokinetic study of stachydrine and leonurine in rat plasma after oral administration of Herba Leonuri extract by LC-MS/MS.
Li, B; Li, X; Wu, J, 2013
)
0.39
" Finally this validated method was successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study in dogs and monkeys after oral administration of 10 mg/kg AST."( A novel HPLC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of astemizole and its major metabolite in dog or monkey plasma and application to pharmacokinetics.
Back, HM; Chae, JW; Kwon, KI; Lee, JH; Seo, JW; Song, B; Yun, HY, 2015
)
0.42
" Plasma concentrations of DPH were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography, and noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was performed with the commercially available software."( The pharmacokinetics of DPH after the administration of a single intravenous or intramuscular dose in healthy dogs.
Gu, Y; Hanna, B; Johnson, R; Mosley, C; Mutsaers, AJ; Sanchez, A; Sinclair, M; Singh, A; Valverde, A, 2016
)
0.43
" To validate the pharmacodynamic biomarkers for GABA-ergic anxiolytics, this study determined the pharmacodynamics of two anxiolytics and a nonanxiolytic control, and linked them to their anxiolytic and sedative effects, during an anxiety-challenge study day."( Pharmacodynamic response profiles of anxiolytic and sedative drugs.
Baas, J; Broeyer, F; Chen, X; Cohen, A; de Kam, M; van Gerven, J, 2017
)
0.46
" Thus, the potential influence of anxiety on CNS pharmacodynamic markers could be examined."( Pharmacodynamic response profiles of anxiolytic and sedative drugs.
Baas, J; Broeyer, F; Chen, X; Cohen, A; de Kam, M; van Gerven, J, 2017
)
0.46
"To determine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of diphenhydramine in dogs after intravenous (1 mg/kg) and oral (5 mg/kg) administration, and when given orally as dimenhydrinate at a dose of 10 mg/kg (≈5 mg/kg diphenhydramine)."( Diphenhydramine pharmacokinetics after oral and intravenous administration of diphenhydramine and oral administration of dimenhydrinate to healthy dogs, and pharmacodynamic effect on histamine-induced wheal formation: a pilot study.
Bäumer, W; Ehling, S; Papich, MG, 2019
)
2.19
"Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis of diphenhydramine and chlorotheophylline at defined intervals."( Diphenhydramine pharmacokinetics after oral and intravenous administration of diphenhydramine and oral administration of dimenhydrinate to healthy dogs, and pharmacodynamic effect on histamine-induced wheal formation: a pilot study.
Bäumer, W; Ehling, S; Papich, MG, 2019
)
2.2
"Oral absorption of diphenhydramine was approximately three times greater with a longer half-life when it was administered as the combination product dimenhydrinate."( Diphenhydramine pharmacokinetics after oral and intravenous administration of diphenhydramine and oral administration of dimenhydrinate to healthy dogs, and pharmacodynamic effect on histamine-induced wheal formation: a pilot study.
Bäumer, W; Ehling, S; Papich, MG, 2019
)
2.29
"This work provides case studies for the pharmacokinetic (PK) analog approach, where a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for a target chemical (has no PK data) is evaluated using PK data from a source chemical (has existing PK data)."( Application of structural and functional pharmacokinetic analogs for physiologically based pharmacokinetic model development and evaluation.
Ellison, CA; Wu, S, 2020
)
0.56
" However, its pharmacokinetic characteristics in vivo are still unclear."( UHPLC-MS/MS Method for Quantifying Fangchinoline, Tetrandrine and Calycosin-7-O-β-D-Glucoside of Fangji Huangqi Decoction in Rat Plasma and Its Application to a Pharmacokinetic Study.
Chang, S; Feng, B; Guan, J; Ji, Y; Sang, Y; Wang, L; Zhang, T; Zhu, H, 2022
)
0.72

Compound-Compound Interactions

The effects of single oral doses of terfenadine, diphenhydramine and placebo, alone or in combination with diazepam or alcohol, on psychomotor performance and subjective feelings were evaluated in a double-blind, crossover study in 20 normal male volunteers. The H1 blockers, including an ethylenediamine (pyrilamine) and a phenothiazine (methdilazine), all produced antinociception when given alone to mice.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"The effects of single oral doses of terfenadine, diphenhydramine and placebo, alone or in combination with diazepam or alcohol, on psychomotor performance and subjective feelings were evaluated in a double-blind, crossover study in 20 normal male volunteers."( Effects of terfenadine and diphenhydramine alone or in combination with diazepam or alcohol on psychomotor performance and subjective feelings.
Hüther, KJ; Koch-Weser, J; Lundt, PV; Moser, L, 1978
)
0.81
" We have, therefore, carried out a multicenter, double-blind randomized trial comparing a combination of high-dose metoclopramide (MTC) (1 mg/kg x 4) and methylprednisolone (P) (treatment A) with a shorter but higher single-dose schedule of metoclopramide (3 mg/kg x 2) combined with dexamethasone (DEX) and diphenhydramine (DIP) to prevent extrapyramidal reactions (treatment B)."( Protection from nausea and vomiting in cisplatin-treated patients: high-dose metoclopramide combined with methylprednisolone versus metoclopramide combined with dexamethasone and diphenhydramine: a study of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research
Basurto, C; Bracarda, S; Di Costanzo, F; Donati, D; Malacarne, P; Monici, L; Patoia, L; Picciafuoco, M; Roila, F; Tonato, M, 1989
)
0.64
" A high degree of synergism was observed in vitro when Pz was used in combination with methdilazine and bromodiphenhydramine."( Drug interaction of promethazine & other non-conventional antimicrobial chemotherapeutic agents.
Acharya, DP; Chakrabarty, AN; Dastidar, SG; Neogi, D, 1989
)
0.49
" The H1 blockers, including an ethylenediamine (pyrilamine), an ethanolamine (diphenhydramine), a phenothiazine (methdilazine), a piperazine (cyclizine) and an alkylamine (chlorpheniramine), all produced antinociception when given alone to mice and also caused potentiation when combined with morphine."( Effect of H1 blockers alone and in combination with morphine to produce antinociception in mice.
Hanig, JP; Hui, FW; Sun, CL, 1985
)
0.5
"Two studies were performed to measure the effects of acrivastine (BW825C), an antihistamine, in combination with alcohol on the central nervous system."( The effects of acrivastine (BW825C), diphenhydramine and terfenadine in combination with alcohol on human CNS performance.
Cohen, AF; Hamilton, MJ; Peck, AW, 1987
)
0.55
" Within the frames of synergoantagonism interplay, the drug combination produced on some of the reactions an effect which was similar to that exerted by one of the components."( [Characteristics of the effect of drug combinations on the development of immediate hypersensitivity].
Chetverikov, GN,
)
0.13
" A study undertaken in dogs has also been made of the pharmacokinetics of the major nitrated metabolite of PETN when the parent drug is administered with and without meprobamate and diphenhydramine."( A study of the plasma levels of pentaerythritol mononitrate following administration of pentaerythritol tetranitrate in combination with meprobamate and diphenhydramine.
Aylott, RI; Draffan, GH; Gilbert, JD; Sögtrop, HH, 1982
)
0.65
" Possible explanations include atypical atomoxetine effect, excess atomoxetine or metabolites due to poor metabolizer status (CYP 2D6 polymorphism/deficiency), a drug-drug interaction leading to elevated drug levels or to excess synaptic norepinephrine or dopamine."( Dyskinesias associated with atomoxetine in combination with other psychoactive drugs.
Bond, GR; Garro, AC; Gilbert, DL, 2007
)
0.34

Bioavailability

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The bioavailability of meprobamate administered rectally to human volunteers as the marketed preparations DoloVisano Suppositories and Dolo-Visano Suppositories sine codeino, is similar to that observed following oral administration."( The pharmacokinetics of meprobamate following its oral and rectal administration as a series of combinations with diphenhydramine, acetylsalicylic acid, codeine and pentaerythritol tetranitrate.
Aylott, RI; Draffan, GH; Gilbert, JD; Sögtrop, HH, 1984
)
0.48
"5 in 8-10 h would ensure good bioavailability of the drug following oral administration."( Mechanism of drug release from an acrylic polymer-wax matrix tablet.
Fawzi, MB; Huang, HP; Mehta, SC; Radebaugh, GW, 1994
)
0.29
"The quantitative structure-bioavailability relationship of 232 structurally diverse drugs was studied to evaluate the feasibility of constructing a predictive model for the human oral bioavailability of prospective new medicinal agents."( QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
Topliss, JG; Yoshida, F, 2000
)
0.31
" Because nicotine was postulated to be a beneficial component of tobacco smoke for ulcerative colitis, various formulations of nicotine have been developed to improve the local bioavailability within the gastrointestinal tissue."( Transport mechanisms of nicotine across the human intestinal epithelial cell line Caco-2.
Fukada, A; Inui, K; Saito, H, 2002
)
0.31
" Human oral bioavailability is an important pharmacokinetic property, which is directly related to the amount of drug available in the systemic circulation to exert pharmacological and therapeutic effects."( Hologram QSAR model for the prediction of human oral bioavailability.
Andricopulo, AD; Moda, TL; Montanari, CA, 2007
)
0.34
" This validated method is a novel technique for sample preparation and quantitation, which was successfully applied to estimate the bioavailability of mangiferin."( Determination of mangiferin in rat plasma by liquid-liquid extraction with UPLC-MS/MS.
Chen, C; Han, D; Tang, X; Zhang, C; Zhang, Y, 2010
)
0.36
" The aim of the present study was to examine the variability of bioavailability (F) of bisoprolol in routinely treated Japanese patients and intestinal absorption characteristics of the drug."( Variability of bioavailability and intestinal absorption characteristics of bisoprolol.
Fujii, N; Hashimoto, Y; Horie, A; Inoue, H; Ishida, K; Nishimura, M; Nozawa, T; Taguchi, M, 2013
)
0.39
"Vemurafenib and dabrafenib are both orally bioavailable small molecule agents that block mitogen activated protein kinase signalling in patients with melanoma and BRAF(V600E) mutation."( Successful desensitization protocol for hypersensitivity reaction probably caused by dabrafenib in a patient with metastatic melanoma.
Abu-Amna, M; Bar-Sela, G; Hadad, S; Haim, N; Shahar, E, 2015
)
0.42
" Multiwalled carbon nanotubes are known to have a high adsorptive capacity for organic contaminants, leading to potential uses in water remediation; however, there is concern that co-exposure with MWCNTs may alter the bioavailability of organic compounds."( Effects of multiwalled carbon nanotubes on the bioavailability and toxicity of diphenhydramine to Pimephales promelas in sediment exposures.
Black, MC; Henderson, WM; Myer, MH, 2017
)
0.68
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51
" The choice of excipients depends on the concentration, manufacturability, stability, and bioavailability of the active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs)."( On-Demand Manufacturing of Direct Compressible Tablets: Can Formulation Be Simplified?
Azad, MA; Brancazio, D; Eccles, ME; Grela, E; Hammersmith, G; Klee, DM; Myerson, AS; Osorio, JG; Rapp, K; Sloan, R; Wang, A, 2019
)
0.51
" Bioavailability of intragastric diphenhydramine was less than one percent and six percent for 1 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg intragastric doses, respectively."( Pharmacokinetics of diphenhydramine following single-dose intravenous and oral administration in non-fasted adult horses.
Christensen, JM; Redmond, JS; Schlipf, JW; Stang, BV, 2022
)
1.33

Dosage Studied

Diphenhydramine and dextromethorphan dosing errors were the most common cause of medication errors resulting from CCM use. Administration in older hospitalized patients is associated with an increased risk of cognitive decline and other adverse effects with a dose-response relationship.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" In vitro dose-response curves to gastrin I, CCK, and the octapeptide of CCK (OP) demonstrated that both CCK and OP were partial agonists on the LES muscle."( Mechanism of cholecystokinin inhibition of lower esophageal sphincter pressure.
Cohen, S; DiMarino, AJ; Fisher, RS, 1975
)
0.25
" Intradermal histamine dose-response thresholds of pruritus were obtained before and after pretreatment with the three antihistamines and placebo in each subject."( Suppression of histamine-induced pruritus by three antihistaminic drugs.
Cohan, R; Leifer, KN; Rhoades, RB; Wittig, HJ, 1975
)
0.25
"2 mg/m-3, while normal guinea pigs and pretreated guinea pigs that were dosed with an antihistamine immediately prior to exposure survived."( An evaluation of the inhalation toxicity of one commercial proteolytic enzyme preparation.
Groth, DH; Richards, DE; Scheel, LD, 1975
)
0.25
" A positive dose-response relationship was obtained only for pentobarbital; neither dose of diphenhydramine was significantly different from 60 mg of pentobarbital for any response variable."( Hypnotic efficacy of diphenhydramine, methapyrilene, and pentobarbital.
Brown, BW; Brown, CR; Forrest, WH; James, KE; Mahler, DL; Teutsch, G, 1975
)
0.79
" The dye leakage response to nasal capsaicin challenge was abolished by pretreatment with topical lidocaine, general substance P analogue, topical or general high dosage capsaicin."( Study on the dye leakage response of nasal mucosa following topical, capsaicin challenge in guinea pigs.
Asakura, K; Kataura, A; Kojima, T; Narita, S; Shirasaki, H, 1992
)
0.28
" Regimen B, employing a lower dosage of metoclopramide and steroids and using a more simple schedule of administration should be the preferred treatment."( Antiemetic activity of two different high doses and schedules of metoclopramide in dacarbazine-treated cancer patients.
Basurto, C; Boschetti, E; Bracarda, S; Del Favero, A; Lupattelli, M; Picciafuoco, M; Roila, F; Sassi, M; Tonato, M, 1992
)
0.28
" Histamine increased in a dose-dependent manner cellular cAMP content in L cells permanently transfected with this gene, and preincubation of the cells with the H2-selective antagonist cimetidine shifted the dose-response curve to the right."( Molecular cloning of a gene encoding the histamine H2 receptor.
Campbell, V; DelValle, J; Gantz, I; Logsdon, C; Schäffer, M; Uhler, M; Yamada, T, 1991
)
0.28
" A combination of FPL55712 (leukotriene antagonist), diphenhydramine (histamine antagonist), and indomethacin (cyclooxygenase inhibitor) shifted the dose-response curve of ET-1 to the right and suppressed the maximal constriction."( Multiple mechanisms of bronchoconstrictive responses to endothelin-1.
Hasegawa, S; Hirata, F; Ishii, Y; Ninomiya, H; Nomura, A; Ohse, H; Saotome, M; Uchida, Y, 1991
)
0.53
"This report describes an unexpected adverse effect in three children receiving teniposide at 3-5 times the conventional dosage (i."( Somnolence, hypotension, and metabolic acidosis following high-dose teniposide treatment in children with leukemia.
Baker, DK; McLeod, HL; Pui, CH; Rodman, JH, 1991
)
0.28
" In a separate group of ten patients whose previous reactions to RCM were life threatening (shock), pretreatment was accompanied by a provocative dosing regimen."( Comparison of three pretreatment protocols to prevent anaphylactoid reactions to radiocontrast media.
Lieberman, PL; Marshall, GD, 1991
)
0.28
" Subjects were initially dosed with either a placebo vehicle or 25 mg diphenhydramine in a 10 ml formulation."( Antitussive effects of diphenhydramine on the citric acid aerosol-induced cough response in humans.
Ciccone, PE; Masurat, T; Packman, EW; Wilson, J, 1991
)
0.83
" Diphenhydramine hydrochloride thus appears to be effective in the treatment of insomnia, but the appropriate dosage will depend on previous medical treatment of insomnia."( Clinical evaluation of diphenhydramine hydrochloride for the treatment of insomnia in psychiatric patients: a double-blind study.
Kudo, Y; Kurihara, M, 1990
)
1.5
" Mean peak plasma concentrations after sublingual administration were slightly lower than after oral dosage (38."( Diphenhydramine kinetics following intravenous, oral, and sublingual dimenhydrinate administration.
Greenblatt, DJ; Harmatz, JS; Luna, BG; Scavone, JM; von Moltke, L, 1990
)
1.72
" Dose-response curves were plotted from data obtained following exposure to histamine (10(-7)-10(-3)) and GTN (10(-9)-10(-7)) and compared to responses from age-matched untreated controls, diabetic and diabetic rats treated with insulin (2 U/day)."( Histamine relaxation of aortic rings from diabetic rats.
Chang, KS; Tanz, RD; Weller, TS, 1989
)
0.28
" With increasing doses of histamine, a dose-response relationship was seen in the activity of RAR."( Action of histamine on the rapidly adapting airway receptors in the dog.
Kappagoda, CT; Ravi, K; Teo, KK, 1989
)
0.28
"The present trial with high oral doses of metoclopramide was undertaken to (a) determine a well-tolerated dosage of oral metoclopramide; (b) measure the blood levels achieved with these oral doses; (c) determine the side effects of high doses; and (d) observe for antiemetic efficacy."( Dose-ranging antiemetic trial of high-dose oral metoclopramide.
Clark, RA; Gralla, RJ; Kris, MG; Tyson, LB; Young, CW, 1989
)
0.28
" Dose-response relationships were obscured by a large variability in response of individual skins."( Effects of chloropyramine, dimethindene and diphenhydramine on transepithelial ion transport: studies in bovine tracheal epithelium and frog skin.
Durand, J; Durand-Arczynska, W; Schoenenweid, F, 1986
)
0.53
" All three antihistaminics, at some dosage levels, slightly increased activity when given alone, but strongly enhanced morphine-induced hyperactivity."( Enhancement of morphine-induced hyperactivity by antihistaminic drugs in mice.
Castellano, C; D'Amato, FR; Sansone, M, 1986
)
0.27
" All three antihistaminics, at some dosage levels, enhanced morphine-induced hyperactivity, but did not change or even reduce locomotor stimulation induced by amphetamine and scopolamine."( Antihistaminics enhance morphine-, but not amphetamine- and scopolamine-induced hyperactivity in mice.
D'Udine, B; Renzi, P; Sansone, M; Vetulani, J, 1987
)
0.27
" H1-agonists (2-methylHi and 2-thiazolylethylamine) also depressed the avoidance response; their dose-response lines run parallel to that of Hi."( The effects of histamine and some related compounds on conditioned avoidance response in rats.
Akahori, H; Kamei, C; Kitazumi, K; Tasaka, K, 1985
)
0.27
" Nonetheless, it would appear that if DPH is administered in the therapeutic dosage range at the intervals typically recommended for cold symptoms and allergies, it appears some aspects of human performance may be impaired."( Asynchronies of diphenhydramine plasma-performance relationships.
Barnett, G; Licko, V; Thompson, T, 1986
)
0.62
"Four consecutive trials were undertaken to study lorazepam at each of three dosage levels and diphenhydramine when used in combination with iv metoclopramide and dexamethasone in patients receiving cisplatin at 120 mg/m2."( Consecutive dose-finding trials adding lorazepam to the combination of metoclopramide plus dexamethasone: improved subjective effectiveness over the combination of diphenhydramine plus metoclopramide plus dexamethasone.
Clark, RA; Fiore, JJ; Gralla, RJ; Groshen, S; Kelsen, DP; Kris, MG; Tyson, LB, 1985
)
0.68
" Histamine at the peak of its dose-response curve, 3 x 10(-4)moles/liter, produced approximately a 300% increase in cyclic 3',5'-AMP accumulation in the guinea pig, 60% in the cat, and 90% in the human heart particles."( Activation of myocardial adenyl cyclase by histamine in guinea pig, cat, and human heart.
Klein, I; Levey, GS, 1971
)
0.25
" In the isolated guinea pig ileum, the dose-response curve for histamine was shifted to the right by 10(-8) mol/l of diphenhydramine, clemastine or azelastine to the same degree."( Effects of azelastine hydrochloride, a new antiallergic drug, on the gastrointestinal tract.
Igarashi, T; Murakami, M; Shoji, T; Yamanaka, T, 1981
)
0.47
" Both substance P and histamine produced sigmoid dose-response curves for the following parameters: 1 min and 5 min planimetrically measured areas of erythema, and mean diameter of weal."( Vascular responses of human skin to injection of substance P and mechanism of action.
Coutts, AA; Eady, RA; Greaves, MW; Jorizzo, JL, 1983
)
0.27
" Simultaneous application of Hi and 10 micrograms of diphenhydramine, pyrilamine or promethazine, apparently causing no analgesic effect from a single administration, caused a parallel shift of the dose-response curve of Hi to the right."( Analgesic effect of histamine induced by intracerebral injection into mice.
Chung, YH; Kamei, C; Miyake, H; Tasaka, K, 1984
)
0.52
" The H1-histamine antagonists, (+)-chloropheniramine and diphenhydramine, caused a parallel shift to the right of the splenic extract dose-response curve without suppression of the maximum response."( H1-histamine receptors may mediate the contractile response of guinea-pig ileum to 'histamine-free' splenic extracts.
Ainz, LF; Casis, E; de Gandarias, JM; Gil-Rodrigo, CE; Goiriena de Gandarias, JJ, 1983
)
0.51
"The present work investigates (a) the modification by pretreatment with selective H1- and H2-receptor antagonists on the dose-response curves (DRC) to histamine for heart rate, blood pressure, renal arterial blood flow and renal vascular resistance in anesthetized dogs, and (b) the characteristics of the DRC to histamine in canine isolated renal artery."( Histamine H1- and H2-receptors in canine renal artery in vivo and in vitro.
Bedate, H; Esplugues, J; Moragues, A; Morcillo, E, 1981
)
0.26
" Diphenhydramine administered at the dosage level used in therapeutic combination products did not alter the blood levels of methaqualone or its metabolite."( Methaqualone-diphenhydramine interaction study in humans.
Hindmarsh, KW; Korchinski, ED; Schneider, CB; Wallace, SM, 1983
)
1.55
" The presence of specific H1 histamine receptors was further supported by shifts in the dose-response curve to histamine by four different concentrations of diphenhydramine."( Mechanisms of histamine stimulated secretion in rabbit ileal mucosa.
Higgs, NB; Linaker, BD; McKay, JS; Turnberg, LA, 1981
)
0.46
" Assessments were made prior to dosing and at one, three, and five hours after dosing; a 7-hour post-drug assessment was included in the second trial."( Characterization of daytime sleepiness and psychomotor performance following H1 receptor antagonists.
Canestrari, DA; Miller, RD; Riker, DK; Witek, TJ; Yang, JY, 1995
)
0.29
"05) and slower choice reaction times were noted one and three hours after dosing (P < ."( Characterization of daytime sleepiness and psychomotor performance following H1 receptor antagonists.
Canestrari, DA; Miller, RD; Riker, DK; Witek, TJ; Yang, JY, 1995
)
0.29
" In healthy volunteers full dose-response curves were constructed by infusing histamine, before and after administration of an H1 or H2 antagonist or both antagonists, into dorsal hand veins preconstricted with the alpha-adrenergic agonist phenylephrine."( Histamine-induced venodilation in human beings involves both H1 and H2 receptor subtypes.
Bedarida, G; Blaschke, TF; Dachman, WD; Hoffman, BB, 1994
)
0.29
" Since the dose-response relationship is not typical of a drug-receptor interaction, it appears unlikely that the leukotoxin is a direct agonist of H1 receptors."( Effects of Pasteurella haemolytica culture supernate on bovine tracheal smooth muscle.
Bélanger, A; Harris, WH; Yamashiro, S, 1993
)
0.29
" 15 min before dichlorvos dosing significantly reduced the development of toxicity and increased 24-h survival rates to 87 and 100% respectively."( Prevention and treatment of dichlorvos-induced toxicosis in mice by diphenhydramine.
Faris, GA; Mohammad, FK, 1997
)
0.53
" There were no differences between loratadine and placebo after the initial dose or steady-state (day 5) dosing for any measure of cognitive or psychomotor test performance, mood, or sedation."( Initial and steady-state effects of diphenhydramine and loratadine on sedation, cognition, mood, and psychomotor performance.
Berman, B; Harris, AG; Kay, GG; Mockoviak, SH; Morris, CE; Reeves, D; Starbuck, V; Sukenik, E, 1997
)
0.57
" dosing was only 32."( Role of the liver and gut in systemic diphenhydramine clearance in adult nonpregnant sheep.
Kumar, S; Riggs, KW; Rurak, DW, 1999
)
0.57
"5 hours after dosing were latency of the P300 event-related potential in which increased latency reflects a decreased rate of cognitive processing, visual analogue scale for subjective somnolence, and histamine skin tests for measurement of peripheral H1-blockade."( Central nervous system effects of H1-receptor antagonists in the elderly.
Fraser, TG; Maher, J; Pillay, N; Simons, FE; Simons, KJ, 1999
)
0.3
" Methysergide counteracted the effect of thioperamide in the open-field test only at a high dosage (50 mg/kg)."( Combined action of thioperamide plus scopolamine, diphenhydramine, or methysergide on memory in mice.
Di Carlo, G; Ghi, P; Molinengo, L, 1999
)
0.56
" infusion via an ambulatory infusion pump with patient-activated intermittent dosing (BAD pump) for prevention of acute and delayed nausea/vomiting in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) for peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization (MOB) or prior to autologous PBPC rescue."( Safety and efficacy of a continuous infusion, patient controlled anti-emetic pump to facilitate outpatient administration of high-dose chemotherapy.
Belt, R; Coon, J; Cord, M; Dix, S; Geller, R; Howard, S, 1999
)
0.3
" Generally, the brain tumor responses were considered equivocal, because the characteristics of potential neurocarcinogenic agents (such as statistically significant increased incidences, decreased latency and/or survival, and demonstration of dose-response relationships) were not observed."( Examination of low-incidence brain tumor responses in F344 rats following chemical exposures in National Toxicology Program carcinogenicity studies.
Boorman, GA; Hailey, JR; Haseman, JK; Melnick, RL; Neal, J; Sills, RC,
)
0.13
"The potential of liposomes as an intranasal dosage formulation for topical application was investigated in rats."( Usefulness of liposomes as an intranasal dosage formulation for topical drug application.
Iwanaga, K; Kakemi, M; Kimura, T; Matsumoto, S; Morimoto, K; Yamashita, S, 2000
)
0.31
" It is particular noteworthy that this weekly dosing schedule resulted in almost negligible toxicities."( Treatment of recurrent Kaposi's sarcoma of an AIDS patient with weekly paclitaxel.
Chen, MY; Cheng, AL; Hsu, CH,
)
0.13
" Toxicity management consisted of dosage reduction or treatment delay; treatment often was discontinued."( Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin: tolerability and toxicity.
Goram, AL; Richmond, PL, 2001
)
0.31
" A dose-response relationship was demonstrated for most adverse outcomes."( Cognitive and other adverse effects of diphenhydramine use in hospitalized older patients.
Agostini, JV; Inouye, SK; Leo-Summers, LS, 2001
)
0.58
"Diphenhydramine administration in older hospitalized patients is associated with an increased risk of cognitive decline and other adverse effects with a dose-response relationship."( Cognitive and other adverse effects of diphenhydramine use in hospitalized older patients.
Agostini, JV; Inouye, SK; Leo-Summers, LS, 2001
)
2.02
" In the present study, we investigated the dose-response relationship of different antihistamines on the performance in a reaction-time task that has been developed for rats."( Dissociable effects of histamine H1 antagonists on reaction-time performance in rats.
Blokland, A; Ramaekers, J; Scholtissen, B; Vermeeren, A,
)
0.13
" This occurs despite clinicians' attention to patient medical histories, aspiration of the local anesthetic syringe during injections, and minimizing the dosage of local anesthetic solutions."( Managing patients with local anesthetic complications using alternative methods.
Lu, DP,
)
0.13
" On this dosing regimen, tolerance was complete by the end of 3 days of administration."( Tolerance to daytime sedative effects of H1 antihistamines.
Koshorek, G; Richardson, GS; Roehrs, TA; Rosenthal, L; Roth, T, 2002
)
0.31
" The method was applied to the quantitation of the three components in a commercial dosage form."( Simultaneous determination of naphazoline, diphenhydramine and phenylephrine in nasal solutions by capillary electrophoresis.
Goicoechea, HC; Mantovani, VE; Marchesini, AF; Robles, JC; Williner, MR, 2003
)
0.58
" When HSR was observed administration of paclitaxel was temporally stopped and before the re-challenge additional intravenous dosage of hydrocortisone (200-500 mg) and diphenhydramine (25 mg) was given."( [Paclitaxel hypersensitivity reactions in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma].
Emerich, J; Kobierski, J; Majdak, E; Mielcarek, P, 2002
)
0.51
" Results reveal that DMH and DP have rewarding properties, although the molar equivalent dose-response curve for DP appeared to be further to the right than that for DMH."( Dimenhydrinate produces a conditioned place preference in rats.
Beninger, RJ; Halpert, AG; Olmstead, MC, 2003
)
0.32
"Weekly dosing of paclitaxel has been demonstrated to be a well-tolerated, feasible and effective administration schedule."( Multicenter phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel for advanced or metastatic breast cancer: the Saitama Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group (SBCCSG-01).
Inoue, K; Kai, T; Koh, J; Mihara, H; Mochizuki, H; Okubo, K; Saito, T; Sato, K; Tabei, T, 2003
)
0.32
"When compared at 2 and 24 hours, aggressive (20 mg dosed up to four times) IV metoclopramide and 6 mg of subcutaneous sumatriptan relieved migraine headache pain comparably."( A trial of metoclopramide vs sumatriptan for the emergency department treatment of migraines.
Bijur, PE; Corbo, J; Esses, D; Friedman, BW; Gallagher, EJ; Lipton, RB; Solorzano, C, 2005
)
0.33
" Dosing and administration of topical agents in the treatment of primary herpetic gingivostomatitis in preschoolers were problematic."( Management of primary herpetic gingivostomatitis in young children.
Faden, H, 2006
)
0.33
" The dosage was increased to 10 mg daily two weeks later."( Potential aripiprazole-mediated extrapyramidal symptoms in an adult with developmental disabilities.
Brahm, NC; Brown, RC; McElwain, DL, 2007
)
0.34
" In addition to reassurance, pregabalin was prescribed for these myotonic symptoms at a dosage of 50 mg by mouth three times daily."( Successful amelioration of oxaliplatin-induced hyperexcitability syndrome with the antiepileptic pregabalin in a patient with pancreatic cancer.
Hashmi, S; Saif, MW, 2008
)
0.35
" The risk of overdose, incorrect dosing and adverse events is increased in young children due to the greater number of colds they acquire each year."( Over-the-counter cough and cold medication use in young children.
Brewer, M; Ryan, T; Small, L,
)
0.13
" This case suggests that individualized dosing of antidotal therapy may be needed for preparations of acetaminophen that result in delayed absorption or after massive overdose."( Development of hepatic failure despite use of intravenous acetylcysteine after a massive ingestion of acetaminophen and diphenhydramine.
Hayes, BD; Sarmiento, KF; Schwartz, EA, 2009
)
0.56
"One study in sedated patients demonstrated a reduction in pain score but not midazolam dosage when warm water infusion was used to manage colonic spasm."( Pilot feasibility study of the method of water infusion without air insufflation in sedated colonoscopy.
Leung, FW; Leung, JW; Mann, S; Salera, R; Toomsen, L, 2009
)
0.35
"Performances on VigTrack and MAT from 1 to 6 hours after dosing were not significantly different between L/M and placebo groups; in contrast, diphenhydramine resulted in significant impairment of tracking for up to 5 hours (P< or =0."( Effects of loratadine/montelukast on vigilance and alertness task performance in a simulated cabin environment.
Simons, M; Valk, PJ, 2009
)
0.55
" An appropriate dosage of H(2)O(2) could hinder the occurrence of the direct photolysis."( Degradation of selected pharmaceuticals in aqueous solution with UV and UV/H(2)O(2).
Hu, C; Hu, X; Qu, J; Yang, M; Yuan, F, 2009
)
0.35
"The purpose of this study was to examine safety during the initial escalation day, buildup phase, and home dosing phase in subjects enrolled in a peanut OIT study."( Safety of a peanut oral immunotherapy protocol in children with peanut allergy.
Burks, AW; Hofmann, AM; Jones, SM; Kamilaris, J; Lokhnygina, Y; Palmer, KP; Scurlock, AM; Steele, PH, 2009
)
0.35
" Additional studies are needed to determine a dose-response curve and to further evaluate corneal toxicity prior to use in humans."( Diphenhydramine as a topical ocular anesthetic.
Harper, RA; Landes, RD; Suffridge, PJ; Wiggins, MN, 2009
)
1.8
" Previous dose-response studies have had conflicting results."( Diphenhydramine dose-response: a novel approach to determine triage thresholds.
Aleguas, A; Benson, BE; Borys, DJ; Farooqi, MF; Klein-Schwartz, W; Litovitz, T; Lung, D; Rutherfoord Rose, S; Seifert, SA; Sollee, DR; Webb, AN, 2010
)
1.8
" In cases of massive acetaminophen overdose, standard acetylcysteine dosing may not be adequate."( Hepatic failure despite early acetylcysteine following large acetaminophen-diphenhydramine overdose.
Bagdure, D; Heard, K; Monte, A; Wang, GS, 2011
)
0.6
"A novel, stability-indicating gradient reverse-phase ultra-performance liquid chromatographic method was developed for the simultaneous determination of ibuprofen and diphenhydramine citrate in the presence of degradation products and process related impurities in combined dosage form."( Development and validation of an UPLC method for rapid determination of ibuprofen and diphenhydramine citrate in the presence of impurities in combined dosage form.
Mukkanti, K; Rao, DD; Sait, SS, 2011
)
0.79
" We proposed a systematic classification scheme using FDA-approved drug labeling to assess the DILI potential of drugs, which yielded a benchmark dataset with 287 drugs representing a wide range of therapeutic categories and daily dosage amounts."( FDA-approved drug labeling for the study of drug-induced liver injury.
Chen, M; Fang, H; Liu, Z; Shi, Q; Tong, W; Vijay, V, 2011
)
0.37
" After rats were injected intrathecally with diphenhydramine and pheniramine, the dose-response curves were obtained."( Spinal anesthesia with diphenhydramine and pheniramine in rats.
Chen, YC; Chen, YW; Chu, CC; Hung, CH; Li, ZY; Wang, JJ, 2011
)
0.94
" Except for benzodiazepines, which were dosed higher in women than men, equal doses of sedation were given to female and male patients."( Practice patterns of sedation for colonoscopy.
Childers, RE; Sonnenberg, A; Williams, JL, 2015
)
0.42
" Our aim was to characterize dosing and timing of epinephrine, diphenhydramine, and albuterol in the pediatric patient with anaphylaxis."( Prehospital Administration of Epinephrine in Pediatric Anaphylaxis.
Barger, J; Carrillo, E; Hern, HG, 2016
)
0.67
"Continuous diphenhydramine infusion can provide promising outcomes following the failure of intermittent antihistamine dosing in patients with severe mast cell activation syndrome."( Continuous diphenhydramine infusion and imatinib for KIT-D816V-negative mast cell activation syndrome: a case report.
Ali, N; Boigon, M; Fidler, C; Ghani, A; Hamid, M; Jafri, SIM; Malik, F, 2017
)
1.23
" Utilizing a 90-day BUD, lidocaine can be packaged separately from other magic mouthwash ingredients in individual dosage units and applied to the oral cavity using the swish-and-spit method."( Beyond-use dating of lidocaine alone and in two "magic mouthwash" preparations.
Brown, SD; Huffman, J; Kirk, LM; Lewis, PO; Luu, Y; Ogle, A, 2017
)
0.46
" The current protocol for systemic reactions in immunotherapy is for the prescribing physician to reassess the dosing and schedule as well as the risk:benefit assessment for the therapy and determine whether or not to proceed."( Neurologic manifestations in anaphylaxis due to subcutaneous allergy immunotherapy: A case report.
Mangold, M; Qureshi, M, 2018
)
0.48
" The safety profile and dosing information of diphenhydramine use in ESKD population is lacking."( Diphenhydramine Use in End-Stage Kidney Disease.
Cerenzio, J; Nguyen, T; Polyakova, B; Ramilo, JR,
)
1.83
" Information on diphenhydramine used in the dialysis population is scarce, and dosing toxicity is unknown."( Diphenhydramine Use in End-Stage Kidney Disease.
Cerenzio, J; Nguyen, T; Polyakova, B; Ramilo, JR,
)
1.92
" Diphenhydramine and dextromethorphan dosing errors were the most common cause of medication errors resulting from CCM use."( Medication Errors From Over-the-Counter Cough and Cold Medications in Children.
Banner, W; Bond, GR; Dart, RC; Green, JL; Kauffman, RE; Palmer, RB; Paul, IM; Rapp-Olsson, M; Reynolds, KM; Wang, GS, 2020
)
1.47
" Dosage analysis yielded no further information."( Prophylactic Administration of Diphenhydramine to Reduce Neuroleptic Side Effects in the Acute Care Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Alain, J; Berthelot, S; Mokhtari, A; Yip, O, 2021
)
0.91
" Blood samples from 48 New Zealand white male rabbits, under both experimental conditions (physiological and pathological) divided into four groups for each (n = 6) were investigated after inducing each dosage form intranasally."( A Hematological and Histopathological Study on Diphenhydramine Nasal Nano-gel and Nano-emulgel for the Management of Allergic Rhinitis in Animal Model.
Iqbal, FM; Javed, H; Javed, N; Saeed, B; Shah, SNH, 2023
)
1.17
" Overall, using spray-dried granules with ι-carrageenan, this technique for preparing instant jelly formulations is simple and inhibits the bitter taste of drugs, contributing to the development of oral dosage forms suitable for patients of all ages."( Development of Bitter-Taste Masked Instant Jelly Formulations of Diphenhydramine Hydrochloride with Easy-to-Consume Granules.
Fukada, M; Kadota, K; Nogami, S; Shirakawa, Y; Tozuka, Y; Uchiyama, H, 2023
)
1.15
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (11)

RoleDescription
H1-receptor antagonistH1-receptor antagonists are the drugs that selectively bind to but do not activate histamine H1 receptors, thereby blocking the actions of endogenous histamine.
antiemeticA drug used to prevent nausea or vomiting. An antiemetic may act by a wide range of mechanisms: it might affect the medullary control centres (the vomiting centre and the chemoreceptive trigger zone) or affect the peripheral receptors.
sedativeA central nervous system depressant used to induce drowsiness or sleep or to reduce psychological excitement or anxiety.
anti-allergic agentA drug used to treat allergic reactions.
muscarinic antagonistA drug that binds to but does not activate muscarinic cholinergic receptors, thereby blocking the actions of endogenous acetylcholine or exogenous agonists.
antiparkinson drugA drug used in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.
antipruritic drugA drug, usually applied topically, that relieves pruritus (itching).
local anaestheticAny member of a group of drugs that reversibly inhibit the propagation of signals along nerves. Wide variations in potency, stability, toxicity, water-solubility and duration of action determine the route used for administration, e.g. topical, intravenous, epidural or spinal block.
antidyskinesia agentAny compound which can be used to treat or alleviate the symptoms of dyskinesia.
antitussiveAn agent that suppresses cough. Antitussives have a central or a peripheral action on the cough reflex, or a combination of both. Compare with expectorants, which are considered to increase the volume of secretions in the respiratory tract, so facilitating their removal by ciliary action and coughing, and mucolytics, which decrease the viscosity of mucus, facilitating its removal by ciliary action and expectoration.
oneirogenAny substance that produces or enhances dream-like states of consciousness.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (2)

ClassDescription
etherAn organooxygen compound with formula ROR, where R is not hydrogen.
tertiary amino compoundA compound formally derived from ammonia by replacing three hydrogen atoms by organyl groups.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Pathways (2)

PathwayProteinsCompounds
Diphenhydramine H1-Antihistamine Action87
histamine degradation424

Protein Targets (53)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
LuciferasePhotinus pyralis (common eastern firefly)Potency14.38180.007215.758889.3584AID624030
phosphopantetheinyl transferaseBacillus subtilisPotency89.12510.141337.9142100.0000AID1490
USP1 protein, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency39.81070.031637.5844354.8130AID504865
GLS proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency31.62280.35487.935539.8107AID624146
ThrombopoietinHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.06310.02517.304831.6228AID917; AID918
AR proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency28.42240.000221.22318,912.5098AID743063
thyroid stimulating hormone receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency15.84890.001318.074339.8107AID926
regulator of G-protein signaling 4Homo sapiens (human)Potency0.18890.531815.435837.6858AID504845
EWS/FLI fusion proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency29.01890.001310.157742.8575AID1259252; AID1259253; AID1259256
glucocorticoid receptor [Homo sapiens]Homo sapiens (human)Potency26.83250.000214.376460.0339AID720691
estrogen nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency30.29920.000229.305416,493.5996AID743069; AID743080; AID743091
cytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)Potency4.36490.00108.379861.1304AID1645840
euchromatic histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2Homo sapiens (human)Potency0.67020.035520.977089.1251AID504332
v-jun sarcoma virus 17 oncogene homolog (avian)Homo sapiens (human)Potency23.03100.057821.109761.2679AID1159526; AID1159528
cytochrome P450 2D6 isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency8.28520.00207.533739.8107AID891
vitamin D3 receptor isoform VDRAHomo sapiens (human)Potency89.12510.354828.065989.1251AID504847
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2 isoform dHomo sapiens (human)Potency28.18380.01789.637444.6684AID588834
thyroid hormone receptor beta isoform 2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency27.66440.000323.4451159.6830AID743065; AID743067
huntingtin isoform 2Homo sapiens (human)Potency35.48130.000618.41981,122.0200AID1688
gemininHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.70790.004611.374133.4983AID624297
muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency1.35570.00106.000935.4813AID943; AID944
lamin isoform A-delta10Homo sapiens (human)Potency35.48130.891312.067628.1838AID1487
Cellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)Potency33.49150.002319.595674.0614AID651631; AID720552
Ataxin-2Homo sapiens (human)Potency39.81070.011912.222168.7989AID588378
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 4Cavia porcellus (domestic guinea pig)IC50 (µMol)0.98000.00011.00768.7800AID625218
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 4Cavia porcellus (domestic guinea pig)Ki0.51300.00000.887110.0000AID625218
Bile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)135.00000.11007.190310.0000AID1443980
Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member B1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)3.54200.00041.877310.0000AID625207
Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member B1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki3.51300.00322.28879.3160AID625207
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)1.05000.00001.23267.7930AID625152
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)Ki0.37300.00000.690210.0000AID625152
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.37200.00001.15467.5858AID625154
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)Ki0.05200.00000.79519.1201AID625154
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.16200.00010.99178.0000AID625155
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)Ki0.11600.00000.72926.9183AID625155
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.34600.00001.403910.0000AID625151
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)Ki0.08300.00000.59729.1201AID625151
Cytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)50.00000.00002.800510.0000AID1210069
Angiotensin-converting enzymeOryctolagus cuniculus (rabbit)IC50 (µMol)31.85900.00001.612910.0000AID625171
Angiotensin-converting enzymeOryctolagus cuniculus (rabbit)Ki26.10130.00042.03378.6606AID625171
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.64700.00011.01049.9280AID625153
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)Ki0.13700.00000.54057.7600AID625153
Sodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)3.54200.00081.541620.0000AID625207
Sodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)Ki3.51300.00031.465610.0000AID625207
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)1.29500.00010.88018.8500AID625192
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)Ki0.37000.00000.385510.0000AID625192
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.98000.00011.03029.0000AID625218
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)Ki0.51300.00010.954910.0000AID625218
Histamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.17100.00000.44365.1768AID625269
Histamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)Ki0.01740.00000.511010.0000AID625269; AID626411
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)1.11800.00011.18738.9125AID625217
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)Ki0.71100.00030.769310.0000AID625217
Cytochrome P450 2J2Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)50.00000.01202.53129.4700AID1210069
Potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)20.06260.00091.901410.0000AID1207214; AID161281; AID243151; AID408340; AID576612; AID625171
Potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)Ki26.10130.00211.840710.0000AID625171
Sodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)41.00000.00033.64849.2000AID1207155
Solute carrier family 22 member 1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)24.00000.18003.68578.8000AID681348
Nuclear receptor subfamily 3 group C member 3 Bos taurus (cattle)IC50 (µMol)31.85900.10482.83988.3173AID625171
Nuclear receptor subfamily 3 group C member 3 Bos taurus (cattle)Ki26.10130.08582.95428.6606AID625171
Calcium release-activated calcium channel protein 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)500.00000.50004.25009.8000AID749402; AID749403
Protein orai-2Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)500.00008.70009.25009.8000AID749402; AID749403
Protein orai-3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)500.00004.00007.50009.8000AID749402; AID749403
Histamine H4 receptorHomo sapiens (human)Ki42.65790.00060.478710.0000AID626460
Solute carrier family 22 member 2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)32.00001.00004.446710.0000AID681345
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Other Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Histamine H1 receptorCavia porcellus (domestic guinea pig)K0.50.00610.00020.10290.5480AID88625
Histamine H2 receptorCavia porcellus (domestic guinea pig)K0.50.00410.00010.40364.8000AID88008
Histamine N-methyltransferaseHomo sapiens (human)Activity0.01000.01000.01000.0100AID387771
Histamine H3 receptorCavia porcellus (domestic guinea pig)K0.50.00610.00020.10290.5480AID88625
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (347)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
fatty acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid biosynthetic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to oxidative stressBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to organic cyclic compoundBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
protein ubiquitinationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of fatty acid beta-oxidationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid signaling pathwayBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cholesterol homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to estrogenBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
lipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of bile acid secretionBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycle G2/M phase transitionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ER overload responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucose starvationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
in utero embryonic developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
somitogenesisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
release of cytochrome c from mitochondriaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
hematopoietic progenitor cell differentiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell proliferation involved in immune responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
B cell lineage commitmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell lineage commitmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to ischemiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleotide-excision repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
double-strand break repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein import into nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
autophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in cell cycle arrestCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in transcription of p21 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
Ras protein signal transductionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
gastrulationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
neuroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of neuroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein localizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA replicationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
determination of adult lifespanCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
rRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to salt stressCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to inorganic substanceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to X-rayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to gamma radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle cell apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cardiac muscle cell apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
glial cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
viral processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
glucose catabolic process to lactate via pyruvateCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cerebellum developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell growthCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitotic G1 DNA damage checkpoint signalingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of telomere maintenance via telomeraseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell differentiation in thymusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
tumor necrosis factor-mediated signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of tissue remodelingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to UVCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
multicellular organism growthCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of mitochondrial membrane permeabilityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucose starvationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
entrainment of circadian clock by photoperiodCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial DNA repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neuron apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription initiation-coupled chromatin remodelingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of proteolysisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of RNA polymerase II transcription preinitiation complex assemblyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to antibioticCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
fibroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of fibroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
circadian behaviorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
bone marrow developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
embryonic organ developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein stabilizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of helicase activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein tetramerizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromosome organizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
neuron apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
hematopoietic stem cell differentiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of glial cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
type II interferon-mediated signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac septum morphogenesisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of programmed necrotic cell deathCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complex assemblyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to endoplasmic reticulum stressCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
thymocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of thymocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
necroptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to hypoxiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to xenobiotic stimulusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to ionizing radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to gamma radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to UV-CCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
stem cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to actinomycin DCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of release of cytochrome c from mitochondriaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
replicative senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
oxidative stress-induced premature senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
oligodendrocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of execution phase of apoptosisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of mitophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of mitochondrial membrane permeability involved in apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of G1 to G0 transitionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of miRNA processingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of glucose catabolic process to lactate via pyruvateCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of pentose-phosphate shuntCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to hypoxiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of fibroblast apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of stem cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cellular senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-modulating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
nervous system developmentMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart contractionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
response to virusMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
presynaptic modulation of chemical synaptic transmissionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of smooth muscle contractionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-inhibiting G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmissionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
signal transductionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of locomotionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-inhibiting G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmissionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
gastric acid secretionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine transportMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
transmission of nerve impulseMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of phosphatidylinositol dephosphorylationMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmissionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-inhibiting G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of monoatomic ion transportMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
signal transductionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
protein kinase C-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
neuromuscular synaptic transmissionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
nervous system developmentMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of locomotionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
saliva secretionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
cognitionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of postsynaptic membrane potentialMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of glial cell proliferationMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of intracellular protein transportMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic modulation of chemical synaptic transmissionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-inhibiting G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmissionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
steroid metabolic processCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
cholesterol metabolic processCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
estrogen metabolic processCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
monoterpenoid metabolic processCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
epoxygenase P450 pathwayCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
urea metabolic processCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
monocarboxylic acid metabolic processCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic catabolic processCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
long-chain fatty acid biosynthetic processCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
amide metabolic processCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
icosanoid biosynthetic processCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
oxidative demethylationCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
omega-hydroxylase P450 pathwayCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
calcium-mediated signalingMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of monoatomic ion transmembrane transporter activityMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
smooth muscle contractionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
signal transductionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
synaptic transmission, cholinergicMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
nervous system developmentMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of insulin secretionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
protein modification processMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of smooth muscle contractionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
saliva secretionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
ion channel modulating, G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
ligand-gated ion channel signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of smooth muscle contractionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-inhibiting G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmissionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
monoamine transportSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transportSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmissionSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
response to painSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine uptakeSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neuron cellular homeostasisSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
amino acid transportSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine transportSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine uptake involved in synaptic transmissionSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
sodium ion transmembrane transportSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
temperature homeostasis5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cytokine production involved in immune response5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
glycolytic process5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular calcium ion homeostasis5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
activation of phospholipase C activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cytosolic calcium ion concentration5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
memory5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell population proliferation5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulus5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of phosphatidylinositol biosynthetic process5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of dopamine secretion5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
artery smooth muscle contraction5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
urinary bladder smooth muscle contraction5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of heat generation5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of potassium ion transport5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B signal transduction5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neuron apoptotic process5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
protein localization to cytoskeleton5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of fat cell differentiation5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of glycolytic process5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of vasoconstriction5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
symbiont entry into host cell5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
sensitization5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
behavioral response to cocaine5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of inflammatory response5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylation5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
detection of temperature stimulus involved in sensory perception of pain5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
detection of mechanical stimulus involved in sensory perception of pain5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
release of sequestered calcium ion into cytosol5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of synaptic transmission, glutamatergic5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascade5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
presynaptic modulation of chemical synaptic transmission5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of execution phase of apoptosis5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of platelet aggregation5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA biosynthetic process5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messenger5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating serotonin receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
serotonin receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmission5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
behavioral fear response5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular calcium ion homeostasis5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating serotonin receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
locomotory behavior5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
feeding behavior5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of phosphatidylinositol biosynthetic process5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
cGMP-mediated signaling5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of nervous system process5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of appetite5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of corticotropin-releasing hormone secretion5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of fat cell differentiation5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of calcium-mediated signaling5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
release of sequestered calcium ion into cytosol5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascade5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
serotonin receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messenger5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmission5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
inflammatory responseHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
memoryHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
visual learningHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of vascular permeabilityHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of vasoconstrictionHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of synaptic plasticityHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to histamineHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor signaling pathwayHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmissionHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neural crest cell migration5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cytokine production5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of endothelial cell proliferation5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor internalization5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
heart morphogenesis5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle hypertrophy5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular calcium ion homeostasis5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
activation of phospholipase C activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
protein kinase C-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating serotonin receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell population proliferation5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulus5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of phosphatidylinositol biosynthetic process5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
neural crest cell differentiation5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
intestine smooth muscle contraction5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
phosphorylation5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
calcium-mediated signaling5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
cGMP-mediated signaling5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
vasoconstriction5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic process5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of canonical NF-kappaB signal transduction5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of MAP kinase activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B signal transduction5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
embryonic morphogenesis5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of behavior5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of nitric-oxide synthase activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
release of sequestered calcium ion into cytosol5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell division5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
ERK1 and ERK2 cascade5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascade5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
protein kinase C signaling5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to temperature stimulus5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messenger5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
serotonin receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmission5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
histamine metabolic processHistamine N-methyltransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
histamine catabolic processHistamine N-methyltransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
histidine catabolic processHistamine N-methyltransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
respiratory gaseous exchange by respiratory systemHistamine N-methyltransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
methylationHistamine N-methyltransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
fatty acid metabolic processCytochrome P450 2J2Homo sapiens (human)
icosanoid metabolic processCytochrome P450 2J2Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processCytochrome P450 2J2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart contractionCytochrome P450 2J2Homo sapiens (human)
epoxygenase P450 pathwayCytochrome P450 2J2Homo sapiens (human)
linoleic acid metabolic processCytochrome P450 2J2Homo sapiens (human)
organic acid metabolic processCytochrome P450 2J2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by cardiac conductionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by hormonePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of membrane potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion homeostasisPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle contractionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of membrane repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of ventricular cardiac muscle cell membrane repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to xenobiotic stimulusPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by cardiac conductionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion export across plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of potassium ion export across plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion import across plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rateSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cardiac conduction system developmentSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cardiac ventricle developmentSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
brainstem developmentSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
sodium ion transportSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of sodium ion transportSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
response to denervation involved in regulation of muscle adaptationSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
telencephalon developmentSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cerebellum developmentSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
sodium ion transmembrane transportSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
odontogenesis of dentin-containing toothSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of epithelial cell proliferationSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarizationSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle contractionSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of ventricular cardiac muscle cell membrane repolarizationSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of atrial cardiac muscle cell membrane depolarizationSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of atrial cardiac muscle cell membrane repolarizationSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of ventricular cardiac muscle cell membrane depolarizationSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to calcium ionSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle cell action potential involved in contractionSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cardiac muscle cell contractionSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during cardiac muscle cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
atrial cardiac muscle cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
SA node cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
AV node cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
bundle of His cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during AV node cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during SA node cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during Purkinje myocyte cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during bundle of His cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
AV node cell to bundle of His cell communicationSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by cardiac conductionSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during atrial cardiac muscle cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of sodium ion transmembrane transportSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
store-operated calcium entryCalcium release-activated calcium channel protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
adaptive immune responseCalcium release-activated calcium channel protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayCalcium release-activated calcium channel protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of insulin secretionCalcium release-activated calcium channel protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of adenylate cyclase activityCalcium release-activated calcium channel protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of calcium ion transportCalcium release-activated calcium channel protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of calcium ion transportCalcium release-activated calcium channel protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
mammary gland epithelium developmentCalcium release-activated calcium channel protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
calcium ion importCalcium release-activated calcium channel protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
calcium ion transmembrane transportCalcium release-activated calcium channel protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
ion channel modulating, G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayCalcium release-activated calcium channel protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
ligand-gated ion channel signaling pathwayCalcium release-activated calcium channel protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
store-operated calcium entryProtein orai-2Homo sapiens (human)
calcium ion transmembrane transportProtein orai-2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of receptor internalizationAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of translationAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA metabolic processAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
P-body assemblyAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
stress granule assemblyAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA transportAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
store-operated calcium entryProtein orai-3Homo sapiens (human)
calcium ion transmembrane transportProtein orai-3Homo sapiens (human)
inflammatory responseHistamine H4 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cytosolic calcium ion concentrationHistamine H4 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
biological_processHistamine H4 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of MAPK cascadeHistamine H4 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor signaling pathwayHistamine H4 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-inhibiting G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayHistamine H4 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerHistamine H4 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmissionHistamine H4 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (111)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
protein bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
transcription cis-regulatory region bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
core promoter sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
TFIID-class transcription factor complex bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription repressor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protease bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
p53 bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromatin bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA 3'-UTR bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
copper ion bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
receptor tyrosine kinase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase regulator activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ATP-dependent DNA/DNA annealing activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein heterodimerization activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-folding chaperone bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein phosphatase 2A bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II-specific DNA-binding transcription factor bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
14-3-3 protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
MDM2/MDM4 family protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
disordered domain specific bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
general transcription initiation factor bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
molecular function activator activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
promoter-specific chromatin bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor activityMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
arrestin family protein bindingMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor activityMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor activityMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor activityMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylinositol phospholipase C activityMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor activityMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor activityMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylinositol phospholipase C activityMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor activityMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor activityMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
monooxygenase activityCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
iron ion bindingCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
arachidonic acid epoxygenase activityCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
steroid hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
arachidonic acid 14,15-epoxygenase activityCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
arachidonic acid 11,12-epoxygenase activityCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
oxidoreductase activityCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
(S)-limonene 6-monooxygenase activityCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
(S)-limonene 7-monooxygenase activityCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
caffeine oxidase activityCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
(R)-limonene 6-monooxygenase activityCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
aromatase activityCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
heme bindingCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
oxidoreductase activity, acting on paired donors, with incorporation or reduction of molecular oxygen, reduced flavin or flavoprotein as one donor, and incorporation of one atom of oxygenCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylinositol phospholipase C activityMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor activityMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
signaling receptor activityMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
acetylcholine bindingMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor activityMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
actin bindingSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transmembrane transporter activitySodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter:sodium symporter activitySodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine:sodium symporter activitySodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine:sodium symporter activitySodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
monoamine transmembrane transporter activitySodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
alpha-tubulin bindingSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
beta-tubulin bindingSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
Gq/11-coupled serotonin receptor activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
virus receptor activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
protein binding5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
protein tyrosine kinase activator activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein binding5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complex binding5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
serotonin binding5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
1-(4-iodo-2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)propan-2-amine binding5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter receptor activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
Gq/11-coupled serotonin receptor activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
protein binding5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein binding5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
serotonin binding5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
1-(4-iodo-2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)propan-2-amine binding5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter receptor activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
histamine receptor activityHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor activityHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter receptor activityHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
Gq/11-coupled serotonin receptor activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
G-protein alpha-subunit binding5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
GTPase activator activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
protein binding5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
serotonin binding5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter receptor activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
histamine N-methyltransferase activityHistamine N-methyltransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
monooxygenase activityCytochrome P450 2J2Homo sapiens (human)
iron ion bindingCytochrome P450 2J2Homo sapiens (human)
arachidonic acid epoxygenase activityCytochrome P450 2J2Homo sapiens (human)
arachidonic acid 14,15-epoxygenase activityCytochrome P450 2J2Homo sapiens (human)
arachidonic acid 11,12-epoxygenase activityCytochrome P450 2J2Homo sapiens (human)
isomerase activityCytochrome P450 2J2Homo sapiens (human)
linoleic acid epoxygenase activityCytochrome P450 2J2Homo sapiens (human)
hydroperoxy icosatetraenoate isomerase activityCytochrome P450 2J2Homo sapiens (human)
arachidonic acid 5,6-epoxygenase activityCytochrome P450 2J2Homo sapiens (human)
heme bindingCytochrome P450 2J2Homo sapiens (human)
oxidoreductase activity, acting on paired donors, with incorporation or reduction of molecular oxygen, reduced flavin or flavoprotein as one donor, and incorporation of one atom of oxygenCytochrome P450 2J2Homo sapiens (human)
transcription cis-regulatory region bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
inward rectifier potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
delayed rectifier potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein homodimerization activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
C3HC4-type RING finger domain bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activity involved in cardiac muscle cell action potential repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
scaffold protein bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activity involved in ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potential repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated sodium channel activitySodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
calmodulin bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
fibroblast growth factor bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
protein kinase bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
protein domain specific bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
ankyrin bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transporter bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
nitric-oxide synthase bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated sodium channel activity involved in cardiac muscle cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated sodium channel activity involved in AV node cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated sodium channel activity involved in bundle of His cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated sodium channel activity involved in Purkinje myocyte action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated sodium channel activity involved in SA node cell action potentialSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
scaffold protein bindingSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
calcium channel activityCalcium release-activated calcium channel protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCalcium release-activated calcium channel protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
calmodulin bindingCalcium release-activated calcium channel protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
store-operated calcium channel activityCalcium release-activated calcium channel protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingCalcium release-activated calcium channel protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProtein orai-2Homo sapiens (human)
store-operated calcium channel activityProtein orai-2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
epidermal growth factor receptor bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProtein orai-3Homo sapiens (human)
store-operated calcium channel activityProtein orai-3Homo sapiens (human)
histamine receptor activityHistamine H4 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor activityHistamine H4 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor activityHistamine H4 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (72)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
basolateral plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosome membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear bodyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
replication forkCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial matrixCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
centrosomeCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear matrixCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
PML bodyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription repressor complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
site of double-strand breakCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
germ cell nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromatinCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription regulator complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
clathrin-coated endocytic vesicle membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
asymmetric synapseMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
symmetric synapseMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
presynaptic membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell bodyMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
axon terminusMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
glutamatergic synapseMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
cholinergic synapseMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
synapseMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
dendriteMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
dendriteMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
synapseMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
dendriteMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
synapseMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
presynaptic membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
axon terminusMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
Schaffer collateral - CA1 synapseMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic density membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
glutamatergic synapseMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
cholinergic synapseMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
synapseMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
dendriteMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular membrane-bounded organelleCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular membrane-bounded organelleCytochrome P450 2C9 Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
synapseMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
dendriteMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
membraneSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell body membraneSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
presynaptic membraneSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
axonSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neurofilament5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membrane5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
caveola5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
axon5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic vesicle5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
presynaptic membrane5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell body5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
dendritic shaft5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic membrane5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
cell body fiber5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
glutamatergic synapse5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor complex5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membrane5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
dendrite5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2AHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membrane5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
synapse5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor complex5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membrane5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
dendrite5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2CHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
synapseHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
dendriteHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasm5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasm5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membrane5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
synapse5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor complex5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
dendrite5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membrane5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2BHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolHistamine N-methyltransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmHistamine N-methyltransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmHistamine N-methyltransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
centrosomeHistamine N-methyltransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolHistamine N-methyltransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeHistamine N-methyltransferaseHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneCytochrome P450 2J2Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeCytochrome P450 2J2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCytochrome P450 2J2Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular membrane-bounded organelleCytochrome P450 2J2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfacePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel complexPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
inward rectifier potassium channel complexPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
caveolaSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
nucleolusSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
caveolaSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
intercalated discSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
membraneSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
lateral plasma membraneSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
Z discSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
T-tubuleSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
sarcolemmaSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated sodium channel complexSodium channel protein type 5 subunit alphaHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCalcium release-activated calcium channel protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
membraneCalcium release-activated calcium channel protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneCalcium release-activated calcium channel protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membrane raftCalcium release-activated calcium channel protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
membrane raftCalcium release-activated calcium channel protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
calcium channel complexCalcium release-activated calcium channel protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
membraneCalcium release-activated calcium channel protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneProtein orai-2Homo sapiens (human)
growth coneProtein orai-2Homo sapiens (human)
membraneProtein orai-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
trans-Golgi networkAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic stress granuleAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
membraneAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
ribonucleoprotein complexAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic stress granuleAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneProtein orai-3Homo sapiens (human)
membraneProtein orai-3Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneHistamine H4 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneHistamine H4 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
dendriteHistamine H4 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
synapseHistamine H4 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (242)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1079938Chronic liver disease either proven histopathologically, or through a chonic elevation of serum amino-transferase activity after 6 months. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHRON' in source]
AID78680In vitro inhibition of histamine(H1) induced contraction of guinea pig ileum.1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 28, Issue:12
New antihistaminic N-heterocyclic 4-piperidinamines. 1. Synthesis and antihistaminic activity of N-(4-piperidinyl)-1H-benzimidazol-2-amines.
AID19006Calculated membrane partition coefficient (Kmemb)2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-25, Volume: 47, Issue:7
Surface activity profiling of drugs applied to the prediction of blood-brain barrier permeability.
AID177710In vivo protection from compound 48/80 induced lethality test in rats 1 hour after subcutaneous administration.1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 28, Issue:12
New antihistaminic N-heterocyclic 4-piperidinamines. 1. Synthesis and antihistaminic activity of N-(4-piperidinyl)-1H-benzimidazol-2-amines.
AID395325Lipophilicity, log P by microemulsion electrokinetic chromatography2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-26, Volume: 52, Issue:6
Relationship between brain tissue partitioning and microemulsion retention factors of CNS drugs.
AID43581Inhibition of beta-lactamase at 100 uM2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-09, Volume: 46, Issue:21
Identification and prediction of promiscuous aggregating inhibitors among known drugs.
AID625284Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic failure2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID16029Pharmacokinetic parameter :drug bound to plasma was reported1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-12, Volume: 41, Issue:6
Molecular properties and pharmacokinetic behavior of cetirizine, a zwitterionic H1-receptor antagonist.
AID1207245Effective free therapeutic plasma concentration (EFTPC): the concentration of unbound compund in the blood plasma at therapeutic dose (mean of range)2011Cardiovascular research, Jul-01, Volume: 91, Issue:1
Simulation of multiple ion channel block provides improved early prediction of compounds' clinical torsadogenic risk.
AID29925Volume of distribution in man (IV dose)2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-20, Volume: 45, Issue:13
Prediction of volume of distribution values in humans for neutral and basic drugs using physicochemical measurements and plasma protein binding data.
AID566785Apparent permeability across human Caco2 cells after 180 mins by LC-MS/MS analysis2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 54, Issue:2
New drug-like hydroxyphenylnaphthol steroidomimetics as potent and selective 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 inhibitors for the treatment of estrogen-dependent diseases.
AID387771Inhibition of histamine N-methyl-transferase2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Oct-01, Volume: 16, Issue:19
Design, synthesis, and docking studies of novel benzopyrone derivatives as H(1)-antihistaminic agents.
AID311933Inhibition of ASM in rat PC12 cells assessed as residual activity at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-24, Volume: 51, Issue:2
Identification of new functional inhibitors of acid sphingomyelinase using a structure-property-activity relation model.
AID1079944Benign tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.BEN' in source]
AID604024Unbound brain to plasma concentration ratio in Sprague-Dawley rat administered in casettes of 2/3 drugs at 4 hr constant rate intravenous infusions using flow rate of 1 (ml/kg)/hr corresponding to dosage rate of 2 (umol/kg)/hr2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-22, Volume: 52, Issue:20
Structure-brain exposure relationships in rat and human using a novel data set of unbound drug concentrations in brain interstitial and cerebrospinal fluids.
AID625283Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for elevated liver function tests2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625290Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver fatty2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID681345TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of TEA uptake (TEA: 50 uM) in OCT2-expressing MDCK cells2001Pharmaceutical research, Nov, Volume: 18, Issue:11
Distinct characteristics of organic cation transporters, OCT1 and OCT2, in the basolateral membrane of renal tubules.
AID425652Total body clearance in human2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 52, Issue:15
Physicochemical determinants of human renal clearance.
AID1209583Unbound drug partitioning coefficient, Kp of the compound assessed as ratio of unbound concentration in Sprague-Dawley rat brain to unbound concentration in plasma2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Mar, Volume: 39, Issue:3
Measurement of unbound drug exposure in brain: modeling of pH partitioning explains diverging results between the brain slice and brain homogenate methods.
AID1443502Half life in Sprague-Dawley rat liver microsomes assessed as parent compound remaining at 0.5 uM in presence of NADPH by LC-MS/MS analysis2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 04-13, Volume: 60, Issue:7
First Bispecific Inhibitors of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Kinase and the NF-κB Activity As Novel Anticancer Agents.
AID29423HPLC capacity factor (k')2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-20, Volume: 45, Issue:13
Prediction of volume of distribution values in humans for neutral and basic drugs using physicochemical measurements and plasma protein binding data.
AID604025Unbound CSF to plasma concentration ratio in Sprague-Dawley rat administered in casettes of 2/3 drugs at 4 hr constant rate intravenous infusions using flow rate of 1 (ml/kg)/hr corresponding to dosage rate of 2 (umol/kg)/hr by LC-MS/MS method2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-22, Volume: 52, Issue:20
Structure-brain exposure relationships in rat and human using a novel data set of unbound drug concentrations in brain interstitial and cerebrospinal fluids.
AID515780Intrinsic solubility of the compound in water2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Oct-01, Volume: 18, Issue:19
QSAR-based solubility model for drug-like compounds.
AID566784Intrinsic clearance in Sprague-Dawley rat liver microsomes after 60 mins by LC-MS/MS analysis2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 54, Issue:2
New drug-like hydroxyphenylnaphthol steroidomimetics as potent and selective 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 inhibitors for the treatment of estrogen-dependent diseases.
AID625291Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver function tests abnormal2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID52790Inhibition of chymotrypsin at 250 uM2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-09, Volume: 46, Issue:21
Identification and prediction of promiscuous aggregating inhibitors among known drugs.
AID1443980Inhibition of human BSEP expressed in fall armyworm sf9 cell plasma membrane vesicles assessed as reduction in vesicle-associated [3H]-taurocholate transport preincubated for 10 mins prior to ATP addition measured after 15 mins in presence of [3H]-tauroch2010Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Dec, Volume: 118, Issue:2
Interference with bile salt export pump function is a susceptibility factor for human liver injury in drug development.
AID177713In vivo anti-histaminic protection from 48/80 induced lethality in rats 2 hours after oral administration1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 28, Issue:12
New antihistaminic N-heterocyclic 4-piperidinamines. 1. Synthesis and antihistaminic activity of N-(4-piperidinyl)-1H-benzimidazol-2-amines.
AID678715Inhibition of human CYP2D6 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using 4-methylaminoethyl-7-methoxycoumarin as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID1636440Drug activation in human Hep3B cells assessed as human CYP2D6-mediated drug metabolism-induced cytotoxicity measured as decrease in cell viability at 300 uM pre-incubated with BSO for 18 hrs followed by incubation with compound for 3 hrs in presence of NA2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 26, Issue:16
Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
AID1079939Cirrhosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CIRRH' in source]
AID361986Lipophilicity, log D of compound at pH 7.4 by shake flask method2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-28, Volume: 51, Issue:16
Determination of log D via automated microfluidic liquid-liquid extraction.
AID1363521In vivo inhibition of Nav1.7 in C57/BL6 mouse model of histamine-induced pruritis assessed as reduction in scratching bouts at 10 mg/kg, po dosed 2 hrs before histamine challenge and measured for 15 mins relative to control2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-08, Volume: 61, Issue:21
Discovery of Tarantula Venom-Derived Na
AID1474166Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring severity class index2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID77801Histamine induced lethality, at 60-min pretreatment time when 3 mg/kg compound was administered perorally in guinea pigs1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 32, Issue:9
Benzo- and pyrido-1,4-oxazepin-5-ones and -thiones: synthesis and structure-activity relationships of a new series of H1 antihistamines.
AID625281Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholelithiasis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID781328pKa (acid-base dissociation constant) as determined by Luan ref: Pharm. Res. 20052014Pharmaceutical research, Apr, Volume: 31, Issue:4
Comparison of the accuracy of experimental and predicted pKa values of basic and acidic compounds.
AID28233Fraction ionized (pH 7.4)2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-20, Volume: 45, Issue:13
Prediction of volume of distribution values in humans for neutral and basic drugs using physicochemical measurements and plasma protein binding data.
AID76970Effective dose that protects guinea pigs against histamine induced lethality at 6 hours pretreatment time1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 32, Issue:9
Benzo- and pyrido-1,4-oxazepin-5-ones and -thiones: synthesis and structure-activity relationships of a new series of H1 antihistamines.
AID1061889Displacement of [3H]BTX-B from neuronal voltage-gated sodium channel in rat cerebral cortex synaptoneurosomes after 60 mins by scintillation counting2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 22, Issue:1
A highly predictive 3D-QSAR model for binding to the voltage-gated sodium channel: design of potent new ligands.
AID1079937Severe hepatitis, defined as possibly life-threatening liver failure or through clinical observations. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'MASS' in source]
AID680542TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of Carnitine uptake (Carnitine: 0.01 uM, Diphenhydramine: 500 uM) in OCTN2-expressing HEK293 cells2001Molecular pharmacology, Feb, Volume: 59, Issue:2
Molecular and physiological evidence for multifunctionality of carnitine/organic cation transporter OCTN2.
AID311524Oral bioavailability in human2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 15, Issue:24
Hologram QSAR model for the prediction of human oral bioavailability.
AID566783Half life in Sprague-Dawley rat liver microsomes by LC-MS/MS analysis2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 54, Issue:2
New drug-like hydroxyphenylnaphthol steroidomimetics as potent and selective 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 inhibitors for the treatment of estrogen-dependent diseases.
AID699844Antiallergic activity in IgE/Ag-induced passive cutaneous anaphylactic ICR mouse model injected with DNP-HSA-Evans blue dye post DNP-IgE challenge at 50 mg/kg, po 1 hr before antigenic challenge measured after 2 hrs post IgE/Ag challenge2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-26, Volume: 55, Issue:14
Antiallergic activity profile in vitro RBL-2H3 and in vivo passive cutaneous anaphylaxis mouse model of new sila-substituted 1,3,4-oxadiazoles.
AID588211Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in humans2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID1079945Animal toxicity known. [column 'TOXIC' in source]
AID625292Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) combined score2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID26362Ionization constant (pKa)2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Prediction of human volume of distribution values for neutral and basic drugs. 2. Extended data set and leave-class-out statistics.
AID1209593Dissociation constant, pKa of the acidic compound by capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Mar, Volume: 39, Issue:3
Measurement of unbound drug exposure in brain: modeling of pH partitioning explains diverging results between the brain slice and brain homogenate methods.
AID1079943Malignant tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.MAL' in source]
AID1079936Choleostatic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is < 2 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHOLE' in source]
AID47776The compound dose required for 50% block of H1 histamine activity, when administarted intra venously in cats1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 32, Issue:9
Benzo- and pyrido-1,4-oxazepin-5-ones and -thiones: synthesis and structure-activity relationships of a new series of H1 antihistamines.
AID161281Inhibition of human Potassium channel HERG expressed in mammalian cells2003Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-18, Volume: 13, Issue:16
Prediction of hERG potassium channel affinity by traditional and hologram qSAR methods.
AID24562Pharmacokinetic parameter :half life in humans was reported1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-12, Volume: 41, Issue:6
Molecular properties and pharmacokinetic behavior of cetirizine, a zwitterionic H1-receptor antagonist.
AID27167Delta logD (logD6.5 - logD7.4)2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 43, Issue:13
QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
AID625289Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver disease2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID408340Inhibition of human ERG expressed in CHO cells by whole cell patch clamp technique2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 16, Issue:11
Support vector machines classification of hERG liabilities based on atom types.
AID540212Mean residence time in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID135326BBB penetration classification2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 43, Issue:11
Predicting blood-brain barrier permeation from three-dimensional molecular structure.
AID130123Compound was evaluated for its inhibitory effects on delayed type hypersensitive reaction in mouse ears at a dose of 300 ug/site1994Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-24, Volume: 37, Issue:13
Synthesis and topical antiinflammatory and antiallergic activities of antioxidant o-aminophenol derivatives.
AID88625Compound was tested for the displacement of [3H]mepyramine from Histamine H1 receptor by competition binding assay1999Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-12, Volume: 42, Issue:16
Synthesis, evaluation, and comparative molecular field analysis of 1-phenyl-3-amino-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalenes as ligands for histamine H(1) receptors.
AID29359Ionization constant (pKa)2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 43, Issue:13
QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
AID678713Inhibition of human CYP2C9 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using 7-methoxy-4-trifluoromethylcoumarin-3-acetic acid as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID395328Lipophilicity, log P of the compound2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-26, Volume: 52, Issue:6
Relationship between brain tissue partitioning and microemulsion retention factors of CNS drugs.
AID540209Volume of distribution at steady state in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID75769Oral antiallergic activity in the Guinea Pig Anaphylaxis (GPA) at the dose of 200 mg/kg; 4 guinea pigs were challenged with the antigen1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 33, Issue:7
Synthesis and antiallergy activity of N-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]-4-aryl-1-piperazinecarboxamide derivatives.
AID1079948Times to onset, minimal and maximal, observed in the indexed observations. [column 'DELAI' in source]
AID625285Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic necrosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1209581Fraction unbound in Sprague-Dawley rat brain homogenates at 5 uM by equilibrium dialysis analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Mar, Volume: 39, Issue:3
Measurement of unbound drug exposure in brain: modeling of pH partitioning explains diverging results between the brain slice and brain homogenate methods.
AID624613Specific activity of expressed human recombinant UGT1A102000Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology, , Volume: 40Human UDP-glucuronosyltransferases: metabolism, expression, and disease.
AID540211Fraction unbound in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1597735Half life in human at 25 to 50 mg2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 29, Issue:16
Sleep modulating agents.
AID184165Compound was evaluated for its inhibitory effects on passive cutaneous anaphylaxis in rats at a dose of 2.5 mg/site1994Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-24, Volume: 37, Issue:13
Synthesis and topical antiinflammatory and antiallergic activities of antioxidant o-aminophenol derivatives.
AID626461Antagonist activity at H1R in guinea pig ileum assessed as inhibition of histamine-induced muscle contraction after 15 mins2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 21, Issue:21
Mepyramine-JNJ7777120-hybrid compounds show high affinity to hH(1)R, but low affinity to hH(4)R.
AID1079942Steatosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'STEAT' in source]
AID678722Covalent binding affinity to human liver microsomes assessed per mg of protein at 10 uM after 60 mins presence of NADPH2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID749403Inhibition of ORAl1/2/3 in HEK293 cells assessed as inhibition of Ca2+ influx after 10 mins by FLIPR assay in presence of thapsigargin2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 21, Issue:11
Design, synthesis and pharmacological characterization of analogs of 2-aminoethyl diphenylborinate (2-APB), a known store-operated calcium channel blocker, for inhibition of TRPV6-mediated calcium transport.
AID540210Clearance in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID76315Dose that protects 50% of guinea pig from collapse was determined in guinea pig anaphylaxis assay1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 33, Issue:6
The synthesis and antiallergy activity of 1-(aryloxy)-4-(4-arylpiperazinyl)-2-butanol derivatives.
AID130607Tested for dose required to inhibit endotoxin induced mortality in mice1994Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-19, Volume: 37, Issue:17
[(3-Pyridylalkyl)piperidylidene]benzocycloheptapyridine derivatives as dual antagonists of PAF and histamine.
AID7783Unbound fraction (plasma)2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Prediction of human volume of distribution values for neutral and basic drugs. 2. Extended data set and leave-class-out statistics.
AID1636406Drug activation in human Hep3B cells assessed as human CYP3A4-mediated drug metabolism-induced cytotoxicity measured as decrease in cell viability at 121.5 uM pre-incubated with BSO for 18 hrs followed by incubation with compound for 3 hrs in presence of 2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 26, Issue:16
Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
AID189142Percent change in volume of foot edema of test compound to that of positive control was determined at a dose of 31.6 mg/kg in rat; -15/-601990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 33, Issue:6
The synthesis and antiallergy activity of 1-(aryloxy)-4-(4-arylpiperazinyl)-2-butanol derivatives.
AID625278FDA Liver Toxicity Knowledge Base Benchmark Dataset (LTKB-BD) drugs of no concern for DILI2011Drug discovery today, Aug, Volume: 16, Issue:15-16
FDA-approved drug labeling for the study of drug-induced liver injury.
AID1079932Highest frequency of moderate liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% BIOL' in source]
AID47777The compound dose required to elicit marked cortical slowing and spindling, when administarted intra venously in cats1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 32, Issue:9
Benzo- and pyrido-1,4-oxazepin-5-ones and -thiones: synthesis and structure-activity relationships of a new series of H1 antihistamines.
AID1202700Ratio of unbound drug in brain to plasma in rat2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-26, Volume: 58, Issue:6
CNS drug design: balancing physicochemical properties for optimal brain exposure.
AID625282Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cirrhosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID311935Partition coefficient, log P of the compound2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-24, Volume: 51, Issue:2
Identification of new functional inhibitors of acid sphingomyelinase using a structure-property-activity relation model.
AID1578090Unbound brain-to-plasma concentration ratio in rat2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-15, Volume: 182Practical approaches to evaluating and optimizing brain exposure in early drug discovery.
AID1079949Proposed mechanism(s) of liver damage. [column 'MEC' in source]
AID28236Unbound fraction (tissues)2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-20, Volume: 45, Issue:13
Prediction of volume of distribution values in humans for neutral and basic drugs using physicochemical measurements and plasma protein binding data.
AID1207214Inhibition of hERG K channel2011Cardiovascular research, Jul-01, Volume: 91, Issue:1
Simulation of multiple ion channel block provides improved early prediction of compounds' clinical torsadogenic risk.
AID749401Inhibition of human TRPV6 transfected in HEK293 cells assessed as inhibition of Ca2+ influx up to 500 uM after 5 mins by FLIPR assay2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 21, Issue:11
Design, synthesis and pharmacological characterization of analogs of 2-aminoethyl diphenylborinate (2-APB), a known store-operated calcium channel blocker, for inhibition of TRPV6-mediated calcium transport.
AID625280Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholecystitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID624610Specific activity of expressed human recombinant UGT1A72000Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology, , Volume: 40Human UDP-glucuronosyltransferases: metabolism, expression, and disease.
AID29813Oral bioavailability in human2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 43, Issue:13
QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
AID184163Inhibitory effects on passive cutaneous anaphylaxis in rats at a dose of 1 mg/site1994Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-24, Volume: 37, Issue:13
Synthesis and topical antiinflammatory and antiallergic activities of antioxidant o-aminophenol derivatives.
AID318309Metabolic stability assessed as half life in rat liver microsomes2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-10, Volume: 51, Issue:7
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of (hydroxyphenyl)naphthalene and -quinoline derivatives: potent and selective nonsteroidal inhibitors of 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (17beta-HSD1) for the treatment of estrogen-dependent disease
AID1220554Fraction unbound in Wistar Han rat brain homogenates at 1 uM after 6 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Species independence in brain tissue binding using brain homogenates.
AID749402Inhibition of ORAl1/2/3 in HEK293 cells assessed as inhibition of Cd2+ influx after 10 mins by FLIPR assay in presence of thapsigargin2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 21, Issue:11
Design, synthesis and pharmacological characterization of analogs of 2-aminoethyl diphenylborinate (2-APB), a known store-operated calcium channel blocker, for inhibition of TRPV6-mediated calcium transport.
AID1210069Inhibition of human recombinant CYP2J2 assessed as reduction in astemizole O-demethylation by LC-MS/MS method2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Discovery and characterization of novel, potent, and selective cytochrome P450 2J2 inhibitors.
AID243151Inhibitory concentration against potassium channel HERG2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-02, Volume: 15, Issue:11
A discriminant model constructed by the support vector machine method for HERG potassium channel inhibitors.
AID425653Renal clearance in human2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 52, Issue:15
Physicochemical determinants of human renal clearance.
AID8002Observed volume of distribution2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Prediction of human volume of distribution values for neutral and basic drugs. 2. Extended data set and leave-class-out statistics.
AID205268Inhibition of binding of Batrachotoxinin [3H]BTX-B to high affinity sites on voltage dependent sodium channels in a vesicular preparation from guinea pig cerebral cortex at 10 uM1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 28, Issue:3
[3H]Batrachotoxinin A 20 alpha-benzoate binding to voltage-sensitive sodium channels: a rapid and quantitative assay for local anesthetic activity in a variety of drugs.
AID604021Unbound volume of distribution in Sprague-Dawley rat brain measured per gram of brain tissue administered in casettes of 2/3 drugs at 4 hr constant rate intravenous infusions using flow rate of 1 (ml/kg)/hr corresponding to dosage rate of 2 (umol/kg)/hr b2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-22, Volume: 52, Issue:20
Structure-brain exposure relationships in rat and human using a novel data set of unbound drug concentrations in brain interstitial and cerebrospinal fluids.
AID76971Effective dose that protects guinea pigs against histamine induced lethality, at 1 hour pretreatment time1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 32, Issue:9
Benzo- and pyrido-1,4-oxazepin-5-ones and -thiones: synthesis and structure-activity relationships of a new series of H1 antihistamines.
AID28235Unbound fraction (plasma)2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-20, Volume: 45, Issue:13
Prediction of volume of distribution values in humans for neutral and basic drugs using physicochemical measurements and plasma protein binding data.
AID389959Metabolic stability in Sprague-Dawley rat liver microsomes assessed as half life at 1 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-13, Volume: 51, Issue:21
Design, synthesis, biological evaluation and pharmacokinetics of bis(hydroxyphenyl) substituted azoles, thiophenes, benzenes, and aza-benzenes as potent and selective nonsteroidal inhibitors of 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (17beta-HSD1).
AID77800Histamine induced lethality, at 60-min pretreatment time when 1 mg/kg compound was administered perorally in guinea pigs1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 32, Issue:9
Benzo- and pyrido-1,4-oxazepin-5-ones and -thiones: synthesis and structure-activity relationships of a new series of H1 antihistamines.
AID1079947Comments (NB not yet translated). [column 'COMMENTAIRES' in source]
AID1079946Presence of at least one case with successful reintroduction. [column 'REINT' in source]
AID19424Partition coefficient (logD7.4)2001Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-19, Volume: 44, Issue:15
ElogD(oct): a tool for lipophilicity determination in drug discovery. 2. Basic and neutral compounds.
AID1443503Blood clearance in Sprague-Dawley rat by LC-MS/MS analysis2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 04-13, Volume: 60, Issue:7
First Bispecific Inhibitors of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Kinase and the NF-κB Activity As Novel Anticancer Agents.
AID588213Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in non-rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID1851149Antinociceptive activity in mouse model of Histamine-induced itching assessed as reduction in scratching bouts at 30 mg/kg, po relative to control2022Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 10-01, Volume: 73Discovery of pyridyl urea sulfonamide inhibitors of Na
AID604022Fraction unbound in Sprague-Dawley rat plasma administered in casettes of 2/3 drugs at 4 hr constant rate intravenous infusions using flow rate of 1 (ml/kg)/hr corresponding to dosage rate of 2 (umol/kg)/hr by LC-MS/MS method2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-22, Volume: 52, Issue:20
Structure-brain exposure relationships in rat and human using a novel data set of unbound drug concentrations in brain interstitial and cerebrospinal fluids.
AID1175695Half life in mouse liver microsomes in presence of NADPH by LC-MS/MS method2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Ligand-based virtual screening identifies a family of selective cannabinoid receptor 2 agonists.
AID1220557Fraction unbound in Hartley guinea pig brain homogenates at 1 uM after 6 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Species independence in brain tissue binding using brain homogenates.
AID29337Ionisation constant (pKa)2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-20, Volume: 45, Issue:13
Prediction of volume of distribution values in humans for neutral and basic drugs using physicochemical measurements and plasma protein binding data.
AID678717Inhibition of human CYP3A4 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using 7-benzyloxyquinoline as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID624608Specific activity of expressed human recombinant UGT1A42000Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology, , Volume: 40Human UDP-glucuronosyltransferases: metabolism, expression, and disease.
AID88008Displacement of [3H](-)-trans-H2-PAT from Guinea pig histamine H2 receptors.1999Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-12, Volume: 42, Issue:16
Synthesis, evaluation, and comparative molecular field analysis of 1-phenyl-3-amino-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalenes as ligands for histamine H(1) receptors.
AID1474167Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring verified drug-induced liver injury concern status2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID625288Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for jaundice2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID106806Inhibition of malate dehydrogenase (MDH) at 400 uM2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-09, Volume: 46, Issue:21
Identification and prediction of promiscuous aggregating inhibitors among known drugs.
AID604023Ratio of total drug level in brain to plasma in Sprague-Dawley rat administered in casettes of 2/3 drugs at 4 hr constant rate intravenous infusions using flow rate of 1 (ml/kg)/hr corresponding to dosage rate of 2 (umol/kg)/hr by LC-MS/MS method2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-22, Volume: 52, Issue:20
Structure-brain exposure relationships in rat and human using a novel data set of unbound drug concentrations in brain interstitial and cerebrospinal fluids.
AID1628852In vivo inhibition of Nav1.7 in C57BL/6 mouse assessed as reduction in histamine-induced scratching bouts at 30 mg/kg, po administered 4 hrs prior to histamine challenge measured for 15 mins2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-08, Volume: 59, Issue:17
Application of a Parallel Synthetic Strategy in the Discovery of Biaryl Acyl Sulfonamides as Efficient and Selective NaV1.7 Inhibitors.
AID130121Compound was evaluated for its inhibitory effects on arachidonic acid (AA) induced mouse ear edema at a dose of 100 ug/ear1994Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-24, Volume: 37, Issue:13
Synthesis and topical antiinflammatory and antiallergic activities of antioxidant o-aminophenol derivatives.
AID749400Inhibition of human TRPV6 transfected in HEK293 cells assessed as inhibition of Cd2+ influx up to 500 uM after 5 mins by FLIPR assay2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 21, Issue:11
Design, synthesis and pharmacological characterization of analogs of 2-aminoethyl diphenylborinate (2-APB), a known store-operated calcium channel blocker, for inhibition of TRPV6-mediated calcium transport.
AID1079935Cytolytic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is > 5 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CYTOL' in source]
AID86581Antihistaminic activity against Histamine H1 receptor was measured on isolated terminal part of guinea pig ileum1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 33, Issue:11
Synthesis, biological evaluation, and quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis of [beta-(Aroylamino)ethyl]piperazines and -piperidines and [2-[(Arylamino)carbonyl]ethyl]piperazines, -pyrazinopyridoindoles, and -pyrazinoisoquinolines. A new cl
AID1636356Drug activation in human Hep3B cells assessed as human CYP2C9-mediated drug metabolism-induced cytotoxicity measured as decrease in cell viability at 300 uM pre-incubated with BSO for 18 hrs followed by incubation with compound for 3 hrs in presence of NA2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 26, Issue:16
Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
AID1207155Inhibition of sodium current measured using whole-cell patch clamp experiments in HEK-293 cells stably transfected with hNaV1.5 cDNA2011Cardiovascular research, Jul-01, Volume: 91, Issue:1
Simulation of multiple ion channel block provides improved early prediction of compounds' clinical torsadogenic risk.
AID1079941Liver damage due to vascular disease: peliosis hepatitis, hepatic veno-occlusive disease, Budd-Chiari syndrome. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'VASC' in source]
AID1220556Fraction unbound in CD-1 mouse brain homogenates at 1 uM after 6 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Species independence in brain tissue binding using brain homogenates.
AID1207643Inhibition of L-type calcium channel measured using whole-cell patch clamp in guinea pig ventricular myocytes2012Journal of applied toxicology : JAT, Oct, Volume: 32, Issue:10
Predictive model for L-type channel inhibition: multichannel block in QT prolongation risk assessment.
AID678714Inhibition of human CYP2C19 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using 3-butyryl-7-methoxycoumarin as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID626411Displacement of [3H]mepyramine from human H1R expressed in Sf9 cells co-expressing RGS4 after 90 mins by liquid scintillation counting2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 21, Issue:21
Mepyramine-JNJ7777120-hybrid compounds show high affinity to hH(1)R, but low affinity to hH(4)R.
AID1220560Fraction unbound in human occipital cortex at 1 uM after 6 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Species independence in brain tissue binding using brain homogenates.
AID1209582Unbound volume of distribution in Sprague-Dawley rat brain slices at 100 nM after 5 hrs2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Mar, Volume: 39, Issue:3
Measurement of unbound drug exposure in brain: modeling of pH partitioning explains diverging results between the brain slice and brain homogenate methods.
AID678712Inhibition of human CYP1A2 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using ethoxyresorufin as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID28681Partition coefficient (logD6.5)2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 43, Issue:13
QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
AID76325Protection against intravenous histamine lithality in Guinea pigs 3 hour after oral administration1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 28, Issue:12
New antihistaminic N-heterocyclic 4-piperidinamines. 1. Synthesis and antihistaminic activity of N-(4-piperidinyl)-1H-benzimidazol-2-amines.
AID1079931Moderate liver toxicity, defined via clinical-chemistry results: ALT or AST serum activity 6 times the normal upper limit (N) or alkaline phosphatase serum activity of 1.7 N. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'BIOL' in source]
AID678716Inhibition of human CYP3A4 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using diethoxyfluorescein as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID205267Inhibition of binding of Batrachotoxinin [3H]BTX-B to high affinity sites on voltage dependent sodium channels in a vesicular preparation from guinea pig cerebral cortex1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 28, Issue:3
[3H]Batrachotoxinin A 20 alpha-benzoate binding to voltage-sensitive sodium channels: a rapid and quantitative assay for local anesthetic activity in a variety of drugs.
AID183447Tested for dose required to inhibit endotoxin induced mortality in rats1994Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-19, Volume: 37, Issue:17
[(3-Pyridylalkyl)piperidylidene]benzocycloheptapyridine derivatives as dual antagonists of PAF and histamine.
AID1220559Fraction unbound in cynomolgus monkey brain homogenates at 1 uM after 6 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Species independence in brain tissue binding using brain homogenates.
AID625279Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for bilirubinemia2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID318310Metabolic stability assessed as intrinsic body clearance in rat liver microsomes2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-10, Volume: 51, Issue:7
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of (hydroxyphenyl)naphthalene and -quinoline derivatives: potent and selective nonsteroidal inhibitors of 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (17beta-HSD1) for the treatment of estrogen-dependent disease
AID361985Lipophilicity, log D of compound at pH 7.4 by microfluidic liquid-liquid extraction method2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-28, Volume: 51, Issue:16
Determination of log D via automated microfluidic liquid-liquid extraction.
AID1400903Reduction of scratching behavior in C57Bl/6 mouse histamine dichloride-induced pruritus model at 30 mg/kg, po administered 60 mins prior to histamine dichloride challenge measured over 30 mins relative to vehicle-treated control2017MedChemComm, Apr-01, Volume: 8, Issue:4
Discovery and hit-to-lead evaluation of piperazine amides as selective, state-dependent Na
AID22246Pharmacokinetic parameter :volume apparent of distribution was reported1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-12, Volume: 41, Issue:6
Molecular properties and pharmacokinetic behavior of cetirizine, a zwitterionic H1-receptor antagonist.
AID540213Half life in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1079933Acute liver toxicity defined via clinical observations and clear clinical-chemistry results: serum ALT or AST activity > 6 N or serum alkaline phosphatases activity > 1.7 N. This category includes cytolytic, choleostatic and mixed liver toxicity. Value is
AID624607Specific activity of expressed human recombinant UGT1A32000Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology, , Volume: 40Human UDP-glucuronosyltransferases: metabolism, expression, and disease.
AID1220555Fraction unbound in Sprague-Dawley rat brain homogenates at 1 uM after 6 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Species independence in brain tissue binding using brain homogenates.
AID1079934Highest frequency of acute liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% AIGUE' in source]
AID625287Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatomegaly2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID130119Compound was evaluated for its inhibitory effects on 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) -induced edema in mouse ear at a dose of 100 ug/site1994Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-24, Volume: 37, Issue:13
Synthesis and topical antiinflammatory and antiallergic activities of antioxidant o-aminophenol derivatives.
AID1220558Fraction unbound in Beagle dog brain homogenates at 1 uM after 6 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Species independence in brain tissue binding using brain homogenates.
AID604020Unbound drug concentration in Sprague-Dawley rat plasma administered in casettes of 2/3 drugs at 4 hr constant rate intravenous infusions using flow rate of 1 (ml/kg)/hr corresponding to dosage rate of 2 (umol/kg)/hr by LC-MS/MS method2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-22, Volume: 52, Issue:20
Structure-brain exposure relationships in rat and human using a novel data set of unbound drug concentrations in brain interstitial and cerebrospinal fluids.
AID576612Inhibition of human ERG2011European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 46, Issue:2
Predicting hERG activities of compounds from their 3D structures: development and evaluation of a global descriptors based QSAR model.
AID781326pKa (acid-base dissociation constant) as determined by Avdeef ref: DOI: 10.1002/047145026X2014Pharmaceutical research, Apr, Volume: 31, Issue:4
Comparison of the accuracy of experimental and predicted pKa values of basic and acidic compounds.
AID1079940Granulomatous liver disease, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'GRAN' in source]
AID625286Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID626460Displacement of [3H]histamine from human H4R expressed in Sf9 cells co-expressing RGS19, Galphai2 and Gbeta1gamma2 after 60 mins by liquid scintillation counting2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 21, Issue:21
Mepyramine-JNJ7777120-hybrid compounds show high affinity to hH(1)R, but low affinity to hH(4)R.
AID389960Metabolic stability in Sprague-Dawley rat liver microsomes assessed as intrinsic clearance per mg of protein at 1 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-13, Volume: 51, Issue:21
Design, synthesis, biological evaluation and pharmacokinetics of bis(hydroxyphenyl) substituted azoles, thiophenes, benzenes, and aza-benzenes as potent and selective nonsteroidal inhibitors of 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (17beta-HSD1).
AID311934Dissociation constant, pKa of the compound2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-24, Volume: 51, Issue:2
Identification of new functional inhibitors of acid sphingomyelinase using a structure-property-activity relation model.
AID681348TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of TEA uptake (TEA: 50 uM) in OCT1-expressing MDCK cells2001Pharmaceutical research, Nov, Volume: 18, Issue:11
Distinct characteristics of organic cation transporters, OCT1 and OCT2, in the basolateral membrane of renal tubules.
AID1207184Inhibition of calcium current (ICaL) measured using whole-cell patch clamp experiments in isolated guinea pig ventricular myocytes2011Cardiovascular research, Jul-01, Volume: 91, Issue:1
Simulation of multiple ion channel block provides improved early prediction of compounds' clinical torsadogenic risk.
AID237685Lipophilicity determined as logarithm of the partition coefficient in the alkane/water system2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-05, Volume: 48, Issue:9
Calculating virtual log P in the alkane/water system (log P(N)(alk)) and its derived parameters deltalog P(N)(oct-alk) and log D(pH)(alk).
AID588212Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID678721Metabolic stability in human liver microsomes assessed as GSH adduct formation at 100 uM after 90 mins by HPLC-MS analysis2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID651635Viability Counterscreen for Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID504810Antagonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID504812Inverse Agonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID1347099qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347102qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347108qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347093qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347103qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347089qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347097qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347106qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347090qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347095qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1508630Primary qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome: Secreted ER Calcium Modulated Protein (SERCaMP) assay2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID1347104qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347101qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347086qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Arenaviruses (LCMV): LCMV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347107qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347105qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347082qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: LASV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347100qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347092qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for A673 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347083qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: Viability assay - alamar blue signal for LASV Primary Screen2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347154Primary screen GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347096qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347098qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347094qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347411qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Mechanism Interrogation Plate v5.0 (MIPE) Libary2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1347091qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347425Rhodamine-PBP qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347424RapidFire Mass Spectrometry qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347407qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Pharmaceutical Collection2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1347410qHTS for inhibitors of adenylyl cyclases using a fission yeast platform: a pilot screen against the NCATS LOPAC library2019Cellular signalling, 08, Volume: 60A fission yeast platform for heterologous expression of mammalian adenylyl cyclases and high throughput screening.
AID588378qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression: Validation
AID1347057CD47-SIRPalpha protein protein interaction - LANCE assay qHTS validation2019PloS one, , Volume: 14, Issue:7
Quantitative high-throughput screening assays for the discovery and development of SIRPα-CD47 interaction inhibitors.
AID1347050Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr2) antagonism - Pilot subtype selectivity assay2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID504836Inducers of the Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response (ERSR) in human glioma: Validation2002The Journal of biological chemistry, Apr-19, Volume: 277, Issue:16
Sustained ER Ca2+ depletion suppresses protein synthesis and induces activation-enhanced cell death in mast cells.
AID1347058CD47-SIRPalpha protein protein interaction - HTRF assay qHTS validation2019PloS one, , Volume: 14, Issue:7
Quantitative high-throughput screening assays for the discovery and development of SIRPα-CD47 interaction inhibitors.
AID1347405qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS LOPAC collection2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1347151Optimization of GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors: Unlinked NS2B-NS3 protease assay2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID588349qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression: Validation of Cytotoxic Assay
AID1347059CD47-SIRPalpha protein protein interaction - Alpha assay qHTS validation2019PloS one, , Volume: 14, Issue:7
Quantitative high-throughput screening assays for the discovery and development of SIRPα-CD47 interaction inhibitors.
AID1347045Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr1) antagonism - Pilot counterscreen GloSensor control cell line2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID1347049Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr1) antagonism - Pilot screen2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID504749qHTS profiling for inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum proliferation2011Science (New York, N.Y.), Aug-05, Volume: 333, Issue:6043
Chemical genomic profiling for antimalarial therapies, response signatures, and molecular targets.
AID1799778Radiochemical Assay from Article 10.1074/jbc.M111.290619: \\Thermodynamic evaluation of ligand binding in the plant-like phosphoethanolamine methyltransferases of the parasitic nematode Haemonchus contortus.\\2011The Journal of biological chemistry, Nov-04, Volume: 286, Issue:44
Thermodynamic evaluation of ligand binding in the plant-like phosphoethanolamine methyltransferases of the parasitic nematode Haemonchus contortus.
AID1159537qHTS screening for TAG (triacylglycerol) accumulators in algae2017Plant physiology, Aug, Volume: 174, Issue:4
Identification and Metabolite Profiling of Chemical Activators of Lipid Accumulation in Green Algae.
AID1794808Fluorescence-based screening to identify small molecule inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum apicoplast DNA polymerase (Pf-apPOL).2014Journal of biomolecular screening, Jul, Volume: 19, Issue:6
A High-Throughput Assay to Identify Inhibitors of the Apicoplast DNA Polymerase from Plasmodium falciparum.
AID1794808Fluorescence-based screening to identify small molecule inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum apicoplast DNA polymerase (Pf-apPOL).
AID1159607Screen for inhibitors of RMI FANCM (MM2) intereaction2016Journal of biomolecular screening, Jul, Volume: 21, Issue:6
A High-Throughput Screening Strategy to Identify Protein-Protein Interaction Inhibitors That Block the Fanconi Anemia DNA Repair Pathway.
AID1346037Human H1 receptor (Histamine receptors)2002The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, Jul, Volume: 302, Issue:1
A novel phenylaminotetralin radioligand reveals a subpopulation of histamine H(1) receptors.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (3,768)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19902118 (56.21)18.7374
1990's523 (13.88)18.2507
2000's518 (13.75)29.6817
2010's473 (12.55)24.3611
2020's136 (3.61)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 80.58

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index80.58 (24.57)
Research Supply Index8.43 (2.92)
Research Growth Index4.40 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index227.42 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index3.06 (0.95)

This Compound (80.58)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials415 (10.01%)5.53%
Reviews117 (2.82%)6.00%
Case Studies587 (14.16%)4.05%
Observational3 (0.07%)0.25%
Other3,024 (72.94%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (210)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Does Diphenhydramine Alter Thermoregulatory Responses During Exercise? [NCT05586477]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-11-21Completed
The Effects of SlumberCurve™ Following Rotator Cuff Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial [NCT04774965]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-06-30Not yet recruiting
A Pilot Study of Intensified Lymphodepletion Followed by Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Severe Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [NCT00076752]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-30Completed
Pharmacological Anxiolysis With Promethazine as an Adjunctive Therapy for Acute Low Back Pain in the Adult Emergency Department [NCT01129934]Phase 4200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-05-31Not yet recruiting
A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Oral CL-H1T in the Treatment of Acute Migraine Pain, With or Without Aura, and the Prevention of Migraine Associated Nausea and Vomiting. [NCT03877718]Phase 2475 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-01Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab in Subjects With ISN/RPS Class III or IV Lupus Nephritis [NCT00282347]Phase 3144 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
Intermediate-size Expanded Access of Remestemcel-L, Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells, for Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) Associated With Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) [NCT04456439]0 participants Expanded AccessAvailable
Efficacy of Sodium Bicarbonate for Treatment of Acute Peripheral Vertigo: A Double-blinded Randomized Control Trial [NCT05676216]225 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-07Recruiting
[NCT01159548]400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Population of interest was no longer available)
Droperidol on Prevention of Emesis From Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome [NCT05244460]Phase 345 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-02Recruiting
Post Operative Analgesia After Pediatric Hip Surgery - PCA, Epidural or Lumbar Plexus Catheter: A Prospective Randomized Control Trial [NCT03435692]42 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-15Terminated(stopped due to Funding was exhausted prior to enrolling intended number of patients.)
TREC-Lebanon Trial: A Randomised Controlled Trial for Rapid Tranquilisation for Agitated Patients in the Emergency Setting [NCT03639558]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-28Completed
Metoclopramide for Post-Traumatic Headache. A Pilot Study [NCT03056352]Phase 1/Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-01Completed
Reduction of Adverse Events and Re-Presentation to Medical Care After Intravenous Immunoglobulin Treatment in Children With Immune Thrombocytopenia With a Scheduled Post-Infusion Medication Strategy [NCT04741139]Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-02Active, not recruiting
Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Refractory Crohn's Disease [NCT04224558]Phase 1/Phase 215 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-15Recruiting
Investigating the Efficacy of Using Haloperidol vs. Metoclopramide for Treatment of Acute Headaches and Migraines in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT02972502]Phase 466 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Terminated(stopped due to PI lapsed institutional training)
A Phase I Study of Moxetumomab Pasudotox-tdfk (Lumoxiti (TM)) and Either Rituximab (Rituxan (R)) or Ruxience for Relapsed Hairy Cell Leukemia [NCT03805932]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-03Active, not recruiting
Effect of Intradermal Morphine Application on Histaminergic and Non-histaminergic Itch and Related TRPV1 and Antihistamine Treatments (2nd Sub-project) [NCT04700007]26 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-18Completed
Neuronal Correlates of Catecholamine Depletion in Patients With Bulimia Nervosa Off Medication and Healthy Controls [NCT02179814]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-02-20Suspended(stopped due to Conduct of the first analyses)
Multicenter Clinical Trial, Phase III, Controlled, Open, Parallel Group, Randomized, Comparing the Fixed Dose Combination of Diphenhydramine + Dropropizine + Pseudoephedrine and the Combined Use of Dropropizine and Fixed Dose Combination of Pseudoephedrin [NCT01177852]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Withdrawn
Pharmacogenetic Factors and Side Effects of Metoclopramide and Diphenhydramine [NCT01289938]Phase 149 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Terminated(stopped due to To unsuccessful recruitment of rare UM-genotype. All other planned genotype groups are completed (EM, IM and PM).)
Cabazitaxel in Combination With Prednisolone With Primary Prophylaxis With PEG-G-CSF for the Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT02441894]Phase 421 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-30Completed
A Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Laparoscopic Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) With Chemoradiation (Carboplatin and Taxol) as First Line Treatment for Patients With Local Regional Advanced Gastric Cancer [NCT04308837]Phase 229 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-12-03Recruiting
Individual Differences After Consumption of Alcohol and Other Common Substances and Long-Term Follow-Up of Social Drinking, Young Adults [NCT00961792]400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-03-31Recruiting
An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase 1b Study of JNJ-54767414 (HuMax CD38) (Anti-CD38 Monoclonal Antibody) in Combination With Backbone Regimens for the Treatment of Subjects With Multiple Myeloma [NCT01998971]Phase 1242 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-18Active, not recruiting
Therapeutic Rest to Delay Admission in Early Labor: A Prospective Study on Morphine Sleep [NCT03539562]82 participants (Actual)Observational2017-09-27Completed
Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover, In-home Study to Assess the Efficacy of Diphenhydramine Hydrochloride in Subjects With Occasional Sleeplessness [NCT02578186]Phase 433 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-30Completed
Sedative Effects of Oral Midazolam in Comparison Promethazine With Nitrous Oxide/Oxygen on Behavior Management of Uncooperative Children Receiving Dental Treatment [NCT01118884]Phase 320 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-06-30Active, not recruiting
The Potential Therapeutic Effects of Psychedelic, N, N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT), on Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) [NCT06070649]Phase 163 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-17Not yet recruiting
Influence of Losartan and Diphenhydramine on Emotional and Cognitive Functions in Healthy Human Subjects [NCT01321021]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
A Double-Blind Trial of Psilocybin-Assisted Treatment of Alcohol Dependence [NCT02061293]Phase 295 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
An Open Label Crossover Pharmacokinetic Trial of Naproxen Sodium and Diphenhydramine Hydrochloride Soft Capsules Versus Naproxen Sodium and Diphenhydramine Hydrochloride Tablets in Healthy Adult Subjects Under Fasted Conditions [NCT03396250]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-12Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Obinutuzumab In Patients With ISN/RPS 2003 Class III Or IV Lupus Nephritis (REGENCY) [NCT04221477]Phase 3252 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-08-10Active, not recruiting
"Therapeutic Effects of Ibuprofen, Diphenhydramine and Aluminium MgS on Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis" [NCT01293968]Phase 237 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
A Study to Evaluate the Relationship Between Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B) Therapy and Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Changes in Patients With Advanced Cancer [NCT01017731]Phase 268 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Completed
A Randomized, Two-Way Crossover Evaluation of the Bioequivalence Between Two Oral Formulations of Diphenhydramine: ULTRATAB Tablet Versus KAPSEALS Capsule [NCT00662337]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
Comparison of Intrathecal Levobupivacaine Combined With Sufentanil, Fentanyl, or Placebo for Elective Caesarean Section: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Study [NCT01858090]Phase 393 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
Lumbar Stenosis Outcomes Research (LUSTOR)- A Randomized, Double-blind, Cross-over Trial of Pregabalin vs. Diphenhydramine in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Neuropathic Low Back Pain [NCT00638443]Phase 429 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
Probiotics and BeRberine on the Efficacy and Change of Gut MicrObiota in paTients With Newly Diagnosed Type 2 diabEtes(PREMOTE Study) [NCT02861261]Phase 3400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-08-18Active, not recruiting
Comparison Between the Treatment of Thiamine and Promethazine for Improving Vomiting and Nausea in Pregnancy [NCT00861523]Phase 350 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Difficulties in recruiting patients)
An Open-Label, Multi-Center, Phase I Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of RO7283420 as a Single Agent in Hematologic and Molecular Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT04580121]Phase 159 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-04Completed
A Phase 1, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of ARC-520 at Varying Infusion Rates in Normal Adult Volunteers [NCT02535416]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin for Children With MRD Positive CD22+ Lymphoblastic Leukemia [NCT03913559]Phase 232 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-05-14Recruiting
Diphenhydramine 5% Ointment for Pain in Knee Osteoarthritis: a Randomised Double-blind Placebo-controlled Pilot Feasibility Study [NCT05036174]30 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-30Not yet recruiting
Haldol/Diphenhydramine Versus Metoclopramide/Diphenhydramine for Treatment of Acute Headache in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02098499]Phase 468 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
Treg Adoptive Therapy in Subclinical Inflammation in Kidney Transplantation (CTOT-21) [NCT02711826]Phase 1/Phase 214 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-09-20Completed
Randomized Placebo-controlled Crossover Trial of Diphenhydramine for Sleep in Children With Autism [NCT05501678]Phase 226 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-09Recruiting
A Phase II Study: Paclitaxel and Pelvic Radiation for Stage I-IIIA Papillary Serous Carcinoma of the Endometrium [NCT00515073]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-04-30Completed
A Phase II Study of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel, an Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) Tcell Therapy, in Combination With Radiotherapy (RT) in Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma [NCT06043323]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-03-31Not yet recruiting
An Open-Label, Single-Dose Study Evaluating the Pharmacokinetics of Diphenhydramine in Children and Adolescents [NCT00762749]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
Metoclopramide and Diphenhydramine (MAD): A Cost Effective Treatment for Headache in Pregnancy When Acetaminophen Alone is Ineffective (MAD Headache Study) [NCT02295280]70 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
A Prospective,Open-label, Dose Escalation Phase 1 Study to Investigate the Safety, and Tolerability and to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose and Recommended Phase 2 Dose of a HLX07, in Patients With Advanced Solid Cancers. [NCT02648490]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Completed
Open Label,Balanced,Randomized,Two-treatment,Two-sequence,Two Period,Single-dose,Crossover Oral Bioequivalence Study of Ibuprofen and Diphenhydramine Citrate 200mg/38mg Caplets of Dr.Reddy's and Advil®PM of Wyeth in Normal,Healthy,Adult,Human Subjects Und [NCT01053208]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
Qualification of Single Dose Administration of Analgesic Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Neuropathic Pain in Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy [NCT00837941]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Withdrawn
A Phase II Trial of Nivolumab/Nab-paclitaxel/Carboplatin Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Response-stratified Locoregional Therapy for Patients With Locoregionally Advanced HPV-related Oropharyngeal Cancer- the OPTIMA II Trial [NCT03107182]Phase 276 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-27Active, not recruiting
Elotuzumab in Immunoglobulin G4-Related Disease (IgG4-RD) [NCT04918147]Phase 275 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-13Recruiting
Efficacy of Nasal Migraine Cocktail Used In Pediatric Emergency Department: A Clinical Trial [NCT06083571]Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-01Not yet recruiting
A Relative Bioavailability Study of Promethazine HCl 50 mg Tablets Under Fasting Conditions [NCT00947063]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
A Phase 2 Study of Isatuximab in Combination With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in MM Patients Who Received One Prior Line of Therapy Containing Lenalidomide and a Proteasome Inhibitor [NCT05298683]Phase 2108 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-31Not yet recruiting
Comparison of the Healing of Chemotherapy-Induced Oral Mucositis Using Oral Defense Toothpaste Versus Crest Toothpaste and Magic Mouth Rinse [NCT02606994]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-05-29Terminated(stopped due to Lack of enrollment)
A Phase 2 Study in Poor Risk Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma of Total Lymphoid Irradiation & Antithymocyte Globulin Followed by Matched Allogeneic Hematopoietic Transplantation as Consolidation to Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation [NCT00482053]Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Low accrual)
Evaluation of Nasal Congestion Clinical Efficacy for Diphenhydramine 25 mg and Diphenhydramine 50 mg in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis: a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo and Pseudoephedrine Controlled Study [NCT00648973]Phase 41,021 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
A Study To Investigate The Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety And Radiological And Clinical Effects Of Subcutaneous Ocrelizumab Versus Intravenous Ocrelizumab In Patients With Multiple Sclerosis [NCT05232825]Phase 3236 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-05-03Active, not recruiting
Feasibility of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing the Use of Cetirizine to Replace Diphenhydramine in the Prevention of Reactions Related to Paclitaxel [NCT04237090]Phase 327 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-14Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Promethazine and Diphenhydramine as Adjunct Sedatives for Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) [NCT00937924]465 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-02-29Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active- and Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study Assessing the Effect of 600 mg Gabapentin Enacarbil on Simulated Driving in Healthy Subjects [NCT01411124]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Dose-Ranging Study of Xolair (Omalizumab) in Patients With Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria (CIU) Who Remain Symptomatic With Antihistamine Treatment (H1) [NCT00866788]Phase 290 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
The Magnitude and Duration of the Central Nervous System Effects Following Intravenous Infusion of Diphenhydramine Using Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Modeling [NCT05219604]Phase 43 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-03-15Terminated(stopped due to Institution decision)
A Phase 2 Study of Autologous Followed by Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic Transplantation Using Total Lymphoid Irradiation (TLI) and Antithymocyte Globulin (ATG) in Multiple Myeloma Patients [NCT00899847]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
[NCT00590590]Phase 2105 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
Rescue Emetic Therapy for Children Having Elective Therapy [NCT01067677]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Withdrawn(stopped due to We do not have the funding or resources to complete the study at this time)
Assessing Efficacy of Intramuscular Promethazine for the Treatment of Intrathecal Morphine Induced Pruritus [NCT04805073]Phase 4110 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-09Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Cross-over, Pilot Study to Investigate the Efficacy of Rest-ZZZ Formula in Healthy Participants With Difficulty Falling Asleep or Staying a Sleep [NCT04093271]Phase 127 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-24Completed
An Open-label, Phase 2 Trial of Prophylactic Rituximab Therapy for Prevention of Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease After TLI/ARG Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT00186628]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
Open Label,Balanced,Randomized,Two-treatment,Two-sequence,Two Period,Single-dose,Crossover Oral Bioequivalence Study of Ibuprofen and Diphenhydramine Citrate 200mg/38mg Caplets of Dr.Reddy's and Advil®PM of Wyeth in Normal,Healthy,Adult,Human Subjects Und [NCT01053338]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
A Phase 1-2 Trial of Cetuximab in Combination With Oxaliplatin, Capecitabine, and Radiation Therapy Followed by Surgical Resection for Locally-Advanced Rectal Cancer [NCT00226941]Phase 1/Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-30Terminated(stopped due to The response rate observed in the phase 1 portion of the study did not merit further evaluation in phase 2 portion of the study.)
A Phase 2 Exploratory Study of Intravenous QUZYTTIR™ (Cetirizine Hydrochloride Injection) Versus Intravenous Diphenhydramine in the Prevention of Hypersensitivity Infusion Reactions [NCT04189588]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-03-25Completed
"Randomized Trial of Diphenhydramine Versus Continued Midazolam in Difficult-to-sedate Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy" [NCT01769586]200 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Completed
Effect of Diphenhydramine Sedation During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) or Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) [NCT00240123]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Withdrawn
Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Randomized Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of BP1.5375 After Single Oral Administrations Ranging From 0.5 mg to 100 mg in Healthy Male Subjects (Part 1) Followed by the Asse [NCT01965301]Phase 148 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Terminated
A Phase 1 Trial to Evaluate the Safety of Single Agent Flotetuzumab in Advanced CD123-Positive Hematological Malignancies [NCT04681105]Phase 113 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-18Active, not recruiting
The Effect of Antihistamines on Methacholine Challenge Testing in Asthma Patients [NCT01985789]Phase 412 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-30Completed
Evaluation and Treatment of Autonomic Failure. [NCT00223691]Phase 1389 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-03-31Completed
Phase 2, Single-Arm Study of Iberdomide, Daratumumab, Carfilzomib, and Dexamethasone (Iber-KDd) in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT05896228]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-03-01Recruiting
[NCT02023164]Phase 336 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Completed
Phase 2, Open-Label Randomized Study of Daratumumab, Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone vs Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT04268498]Phase 2306 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-02-11Recruiting
Prochlorperazine vs Imitrex for Acute Migraine in the Emergency Department [NCT00573599]66 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
The Use of Doxepin for Urticaria in the Emergency Department [NCT05115136]Phase 3160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-23Recruiting
Chronic Sleep Deprivation Among the Poor: A Lab-in-the-field Approach [NCT03322358]452 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-23Completed
A Phase II Comparative, Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter, China-Only Study to Investigate the Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Rituximab Versus Intravenous Rituximab Both in Combination With CHOP in Previously Untreated Patients Wi [NCT04660799]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-02-24Completed
A Phase 2 Open-Label Study of TPI 287 in Patients With Breast Cancer Metastatic to the Brain [NCT01332630]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-16Completed
A Randomized, Double Blind, Active- and Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Safety Study Assessing Simulated Driving Performance in XP13512-(GSK1838262) Treated Patients With Restless Legs Syndrome [NCT01332318]Phase 2130 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
Phase I/II Clinical Trial Combining TUSC2-nanoparticles and Erlotinib in Stage IV Lung Cancer [NCT01455389]Phase 1/Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Trial terminated by sponsor after decision to evaluate combination of quaratusugene ozeplasmid and osimertinib instead of further evaluating quaratusugene ozeplasmid and erlotinib.)
A Study to Investigate Safety and Tolerability of Higher Infusion Rate to shORten the duraTion of FabrazymE Infusion [NCT06019728]Phase 418 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-10Recruiting
Abatacept for Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease: a Sickle Transplant Alliance for Research Trial [NCT02867800]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Active, not recruiting
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Active- and Placebo-Controlled, Multiple-Dose, Multi-Center Phase 3 Study of the Safety and Efficacy of CL-108 in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Pain and Opioid-Induced Nausea and Vomiting (OINV) [NCT02462811]Phase 3552 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
Evaluation of Re-administration of Recombinant Adeno-Associated Virus Acid Alpha-Glucosidase (rAAV9-DES-hGAA) in Patients With Late-Onset Pompe Disease (LOPD) [NCT02240407]Phase 12 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-17Completed
Psilocybin-facilitated Treatment for Cocaine Use: A Pilot Study [NCT02037126]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Facorial Design Study to Optimize the Dose of Parenteral Metoclopramide [NCT00475306]Phase 4289 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
A Phase 2b, Double-Blind, Three Arm, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Trial With Restricted Response Adaptive Randomization Testing the Efficacy and Safety of High Dose Methylprednisolone or Equine Anti-Thymocyte Globulin as Treatment for Acute Liver Failur [NCT04862221]Phase 2163 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-09Recruiting
Optimizing the Combination of Intranasal Scopolamine and Sensory Augmentation to Mitigate G-transition Induced Motion Sickness and Enhance Sensorimotor Performance. Motion Sickness Countermeasures Field Test [NCT05852730]Phase 280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-10Recruiting
A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Safety Study of Xolair (Omalizumab) in Patients With Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria (CIU) Who Remain Symptomatic Despite Treatment With H1 Antihistamines, H2 Blockers, and/or Leukotriene [NCT01264939]Phase 3336 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
A Pilot Study of Prolonged, Intermittent Exposure to Alfentanil on Opioid-Induced Hyperalgesia in Healthy Volunteers [NCT00991809]22 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
A Phase I, Randomized, Subject- and Investigator-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 4-Period Cross-Over Study Assessing the Duration of Effect of Lasmiditan on Simulated Driving Performance in Healthy Volunteers [NCT03459612]Phase 168 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-26Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Four Intramuscular Interventions for the Management of Acute Psychomotor Agitation [NCT01485692]120 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
Rapid Tranquilization of Violent or Agitated People in Psychiatric Emergency Settings- A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial of Intramuscular Olanzepine Vs. Intramuscular Haloperidol + Promethazine. [NCT00455234]Phase 3300 participants Interventional2005-09-30Completed
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multiple-dose Multi-Center Phase III Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Cl-108 in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Pain [NCT01780428]Phase 3460 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
A Randomized Trial Comparing Auricular Acupuncture and Intravenous Migraine Medications in the Treatment of Status Migrainosus in the Pediatric Emergency Department [NCT02681211]80 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-02-29Recruiting
A Dose Ranging Effect of Preoperative Diphenhydramine on Postoperative Quality of Recovery After Ambulatory Surgery [NCT01451762]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Ondansetron and Promethazine in the Treatment of Nausea and Vomiting in the Emergency Department [NCT00429832]Phase 4120 participants Interventional2003-10-31Completed
A Pilot Study to Determine the Pruritic Benefits of Ondansetron Versus Diphenhydramine in Burn Patients Undergoing Wound Healing [NCT00137202]36 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
Pain Study to See if Ultram ER Will Provide Relief to Subjects Whose Pain is Not Well Controlled by Narcotics [NCT00505531]7 participants (Actual)Observational2007-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Not enough data to analyze the results.)
Value of Intravenous Fluids in the Emergent Treatment of Pediatric Migraine [NCT06182098]134 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-27Recruiting
A Phase I Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Dose-increasing Single Dose Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability,Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Analysis of Pegloticase in Subjects With Asymptomatic Hyperuricemia [NCT05302388]Phase 145 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-04-11Completed
An Open-label, Single-arm, Multicenter Phase II/III Extension Study to Evaluate the Safety of Rituximab Re-treatment in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Previously Enrolled in Protocol U2971g [NCT00381810]Phase 331 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-22Terminated(stopped due to During a safety review of studies U2970g and U2971g, the Data Monitoring Committee recommended that enrollment in this extension trial be terminated.)
Phase II Randomized, Double-Blinded Study of an Antiemetic Pump, Using Benadryl®, Avitan® and Decadron® (BAD), for Children Receiving Moderately or Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy [NCT00429702]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Closed due to poor accrual and lack of feasibility to finish study per DSMB)
Countermeasures to Reduce Sensorimotor Impairment and Space Motion Sickness Resulting From Altered Gravity Levels [NCT02136420]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
Metoclopramide for Acute Migraine: A Dose Finding Study [NCT00682734]Phase 3349 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
Impact of Temsirolimus Therapy on Circulating Tumor Cell Biology In Men With Castration Resistant Metastatic Prostate Cancer [NCT00887640]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Terminated
A Pilot Trial of WT1 Peptide-Loaded Allogeneic Dendritic Cell Vaccine and Donor Lymphocyte Infusion for WT1-Expressing Hematologic Malignancies [NCT00923910]Phase 1/Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-22Completed
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Placebo And Active Controlled, 4-Way Crossover Methodology Study To Assess The Effect Of Gabapentin, Diphenhydramine And Morphine On Cold Pain In Healthy Male Volunteers [NCT01119222]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
A Phase I Study of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemoperfusion (HIPEC) in Patients With Gastric Adenocarcinoma and Carcinomatosis or Positive Cytology [NCT03330028]Phase 129 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-27Completed
Phase I Study of the Administration of Multi-Virus-Specific Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes Expressing CD19 Chimeric Receptors for Prophylaxis or Therapy of Relapse of CD19 Positive Malignancies Post Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT00840853]Phase 168 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-04-30Active, not recruiting
A 3-Day Investigator Blinded, Randomized Study Evaluating Aurstat Anti-Itch Hydrogel Versus Control in the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis Associated Pruritus [NCT01905631]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Completed
Use of Diphenhydramine as an Adjunctive Sedative for Colonoscopy in Patients Chronically on Opioids [NCT01967433]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
Effect of Acupuncture and Pain Medication on Radicular Pain Using QST [NCT01678586]47 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Completed
An Open-Label Pilot Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Tolerability of a Topical Composition Therapy for the Treatment of Cutaneous Mastocytosis [NCT04846348]Phase 210 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-26Recruiting
Phase 2 Study of Bexxar in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma (DLCL) [NCT00490009]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
Effects of Intravenous Lidocaine on Endometriosis Pain [NCT01968694]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
A Randomized Trial to Evaluate Resolution of Symptoms Using Vestibular Rehab Versus Conventional Therapy in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) With Diagnosis of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV) [NCT00641797]26 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
"THINK Trial: Treatment of Headache With IntraNasal Ketamine: A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of Intranasal Ketamine Versus Standard Therapy in the Management of Primary Headache Syndromes in the Emergency Department" [NCT03081416]Phase 380 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Completed
Phase 2, Safety and Efficacy Study of Isatuximab, an Anti-CD38 Monoclonal Antibody, Administered by Intravenous (IV) Infusion in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory T-acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (T-ALL) or T-lymphoblastic Lymphoma (T-LBL) [NCT02999633]Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-08Terminated(stopped due to Due to an unsatisfactory benefit/risk ratio, as specified in & 14.8.1 of the protocol, Sanofi decided to stop enrollment and terminate ACT14596 prematurely)
B-Cell Targeted Therapy for Acute Renal Allograft Rejection With an Antibody Mediated Component: A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label Study [NCT00771875]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
Studying the Effectiveness of Triple Therapy With Palonosetron, Dexamethasone and Promethazine for Prevention of Post Operative Nausea and Vomiting in High Risk Patients Undergoing Neurological Surgery and General Anesthesia [NCT02635828]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
A Two-Part Study Evaluating the Combination of Tazemetostat and CPX-351 (Part 1) and Palbociclib With CPX-351 (Part 2) for the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT05627232]Phase 124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-28Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Multicenter Trial of a Monoclonal Antibody to CD20 (Rituximab) for the Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (SSc-PAH) [NCT01086540]Phase 257 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-24Completed
Antitussive Effect of a Naturally Flavored, Multi-Component Syrup Containing Diphenhydramine, Compared With Dextromethorphan and Placebo [NCT02062710]Phase 422 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
[NCT02655354]635 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Completed
Fundamental Modification of the Gut Microbiota in the Treatment of Refractory Crohn's Disease [NCT02765256]Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-31Completed
Principal Investigator [NCT01644838]Phase 2/Phase 393 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
Low Dose Adrenaline, Promethazine, & Hydrocortisone (Alone and in Combination) to Prevent Acute Adverse Reactions to Antivenom in People Bitten by Snakes: Randomised, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial [NCT00270777]Phase 41,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
A Phase III, International, Multicenter, Randomised Open Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Obinutuzumab Versus MMF in Patients With Childhood Onset Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome [NCT05627557]Phase 380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-29Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Vibecotamab (XmAb14045) for MRD- Positive AML and MDS After Hypomethylating Agent Failure [NCT05285813]Phase 242 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-06Recruiting
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety of Obinutuzumab in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [NCT04963296]Phase 3300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-26Recruiting
A Bioavailability Study of Naproxen Sodium and Diphenhydramine Hydrochloride Under Fasting Conditions and Naproxen Sodium and Diphenhydramine Hydrochloride Combination Under Fasting and Fed Conditions [NCT01666678]Phase 132 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
The Role of Intravenous (IV) Lidocaine in the Management of Chronic Neuropathic Pain of Peripheral Nerve Origin [NCT01669967]34 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
A Phase 1, Open-Label, Two-Part, Fixed-Sequence Crossover Study to Evaluate the Effect of P-glycoprotein Inhibition on Lenalidomide Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Male Subjects [NCT01712828]Phase 131 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-01Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Oral Sumatriptan Plus Oral Promethazine in Migraine Treatment: a Randomized, Double Blind Clinical Trial [NCT01814189]Phase 3350 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
Promethazine vs. Lorazepam for Treatment of Vertigo in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT01827293]Phase 3210 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Topical Morphine Compared With a Routine Mouthwash in Managing Cancer Treatment-induced Mucositis in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer in Isfahan [NCT01837446]Phase 2/Phase 330 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-31Completed
An Exploratory Multicenter, Double-Blind, Diphenhydramine- and Placebo-Controlled Safety, Efficacy and Biomarker Study With JNJ-42847922 in Subjects With Major Depressive Disorder [NCT02476058]Phase 148 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-11Completed
A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Escalating, Phase 1 Study to Determine the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Effect of Circulating Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Levels of ARC-AAT in Healthy Volunteer Subjects and in Patients With Alpha-1 Antitryps [NCT02363946]Phase 165 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Company decision to terminate the trial)
A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Obinutuzumab in Adolescent Patients With Active Class III or IV Lupus Nephritis, Including an Evaluation of Open Label Sa [NCT05039619]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-12Recruiting
Safely Stopping Pre-Medications in Patients Receiving Paclitaxel: A Randomized Trial [NCT04862585]Phase 2/Phase 3100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-07Recruiting
KEYMAKER-U01 Substudy 3: A Phase 2, Umbrella Study With Rolling Arms of Investigational Agents in Combination With Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Previously Treated With Anti-PD-(L)1 Therapy [NCT04165096]Phase 2135 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-21Active, not recruiting
Droperidol Versus Metoclopramide + Diphenhydramine for the Treatment of Primary Headaches in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Randomized, Double-blinded Trial. [NCT01406860]19 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-31Terminated(stopped due to lack of enrollment/drug shortages)
A Pilot, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of Promethazine for Treatment of Diabetic Gastroparesis. [NCT02130622]Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Lack of recruitment)
"Absorption of ABH Gel (Ativan®, Lorazepam; Benadryl®, Diphenhydramine; and Haldol®, Haloperidol Gel) From the Skin of Normal Volunteers" [NCT01204255]11 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-15Completed
A Phase II Clinical Trial of BMS-247550 (NSC 710428), an Epothilone B Analog, in Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT00030992]Phase 2102 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-02-28Completed
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Pilot Study Assessing the Analgesic and Hypnotic Effect of Naproxen Sodium and Diphenhydramine Combination in Dental Pain [NCT01118273]Phase 4162 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Comparison of Efficacy of Metoclopramide , Promethazine and Prochloroperazine in the Treatment of Vertigo. [NCT05586763]Phase 390 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-01Recruiting
Intramuscular Paracervical Injection for Headache in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04109885]Phase 2108 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-15Active, not recruiting
The Use of Campath-1H, Tacrolimus, and Sirolimus Followed by Sirolimus Withdrawal in Renal Transplant Patients [NCT00078559]Phase 1/Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-11-30Completed
Intravenous Fluids in Benign Headaches Trail: A Randomized Single Blind Clinical Trial [NCT03185130]Phase 458 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-16Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-dose Study to Determine the Depth of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Reduction Following Intravenous ARC-520 in Combination With Entecavir or Tenofovir in Patients With HBeAg Positive, [NCT02452528]Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Company decision to discontinue trial)
Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter, Phase II/III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [NCT00137969]Phase 2/Phase 3262 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-10Completed
Pharmacokinetics of Buprenorphine and Naloxone in Subjects With Mild to Severe Hepatic Impairment (Child-Pugh Classes, A, B, and C), in HCV-Seropositive Subjects, and in Healthy Volunteers [NCT01846455]Phase 443 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
Safety of Donor Alloantigen Reactive Tregs to Facilitate Minimization and/or Discontinuation of Immunosuppression in Adult Liver Transplant Recipients (CTOTC-12) [NCT02474199]Phase 1/Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-06Completed
A Phase I Study to Evaluate Safety and Pharmacokinetics of SAR408701 Administered Intravenously as Monotherapy in Japanese Patients With Advanced Malignant Solid Tumors [NCT03324113]Phase 134 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-17Completed
A Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Concealed Allocation Comparison of Respiratory Depression and Coughing During Bronchoscopy With Dexmedetomidine-ketamine as an Adjunct to Fentanyl-midazolam Sedation [NCT01158820]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
A Phase III Randomized, Open-Label Active Comparator-Controlled Multicenter Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Obinutuzumab in Patients With Primary Membranous Nephropathy [NCT04629248]Phase 3140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-25Recruiting
Phase II Trial Investigating Tailoring First-Line Therapy For Advanced Stage Diffuse Large B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Based on Mid-Treatment Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan Results [NCT00324467]Phase 2150 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Active, not recruiting
Randomized Controlled Trial of Infliximab (Remicade®) Induction Therapy for Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients (CTOT-19) [NCT02495077]Phase 2290 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-02Completed
A Randomized, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity of Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed Alone or Concomitantly With Raxibacumab (GSK3068483) [NCT02339155]Phase 4573 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-24Completed
Donor-Alloantigen-Reactive Regulatory T Cell (darTreg) Therapy in Liver Transplantation (RTB-002) [NCT02188719]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-17Terminated(stopped due to The trial could not be completed within the grant timeline.)
Bone Marrow Transplantation and High Dose Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide for Chimerism Induction and Renal Allograft Tolerance (ITN054ST) [NCT02029638]Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-07Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual)
Controlled Clinical Trial of Antiviral Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte (CTL) Infusion Following Combination Antiretroviral Drug Therapy for Asymptomatic HIV-1 Infection [NCT00000875]16 participants InterventionalTerminated
Efficacy of Melatonin and Diphenhydramine Versus Placebo in Treatment of Nighttime Pruritus in Atopic Dermatitis [NCT03688464]Early Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Study never started)
A Phase 1b/2 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Preliminary Efficacy of Isatuximab (SAR650984) in Patients Awaiting Kidney Transplantation [NCT04294459]Phase 1/Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-06-18Terminated(stopped due to Terminated due to non-safety reasons)
Role of Nefopam in Rituximab Transfusion Reaction [NCT05648058]Phase 3100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-20Not yet recruiting
Real-time Decision Support for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) Prophylaxis [NCT02625181]27,034 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Completed
A Phase III, Multi-center, Double Blind, Randomized, Active Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Non-Inferiority Comparing Cetirizine Injection 10 mg to Diphenhydramine Injection, 50 mg, for the Treatment of Acute Urticaria [NCT02935699]Phase 3262 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-01Completed
A Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial of IV Metoclopramide for Acute Post-traumatic Headache [NCT03220958]Phase 3160 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-01Completed
A Phase I Single-Arm Study of the Combination of Durvalumab (MEDI4736) and Vicineum (Oportuzumab Monatox, VB4-845) in Subjects With High-Grade Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Previously Treated With Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) [NCT03258593]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-07Completed
A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Study on Influence of E-aid Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia to Reduce Incidence of Depression as Well as Suicidal Ideation in Patients With Insomnia [NCT03309527]1,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-11-01Enrolling by invitation
Dyphenhidramine Effect on Prevention of Sevoflurane Induced Post Anesthesia Agitation in Pediatric [NCT02463929]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
Glutaminergic and Histaminergic Pathway Modulation in Acute Ischemic Stroke as an Effective Neuroprotection Strategy. [NCT02142712]Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
Postoperative Sleep Quality Following Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Diphenhydramine and Melatonin Versus Sleep Skills Training [NCT03968939]Phase 4375 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-01Recruiting
Pharmacovigilance in Gerontopsychiatric Patients [NCT02374567]Phase 3407 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Terminated
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Multiple Dose Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of BMS-986263 in Healthy Participants [NCT03142165]Phase 133 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-11Completed
An Open Label, Balanced, Randomized, Single-dose, Two-treatment, Two-sequence, Two-period, Two-way Crossover, Oral Comparative Pharmacokinetic (PK) Study of Ibuprofen and Diphenhydramine Hydrochloride Modified-Release Tablets, 400mg/50mg of Overseas Pharm [NCT05729555]Phase 116 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-03Not yet recruiting
Preoperative Gabapentin for Acute and Chronic Post-thoracotomy Analgesia: A Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Study [NCT00588159]146 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
Aprepitant Versus Ondansetron in Preoperative Triple-therapy Treatment of Nausea and Vomiting [NCT01474915]Phase 4122 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
A Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Pazopanib Versus Temsirolimus in Poor-Risk Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT01392183]Phase 269 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-24Completed
A Randomized, Double Blind, and Placebo-Controlled Trial Comparing Ondansetron, Metoclopramide and Promethazine for the Treatment of Nausea and Vomiting in the Adult Emergency Department. [NCT00655642]171 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Conditional analysis showed observed differences were significantly less than power calculations)
An Open-Label Trial to Explore Symptomatic Therapy for Application Site Reaction to SPM962 in Healthy Subject [NCT01737931]Phase 1120 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Completed
Median Nerve Acustimulation Plus Medical Anti-emetic Therapy for Control Post-operative Nausea in Patients Undergoing Foregut Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial [NCT01510379]100 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
Effect of Metformin and Probiotics in Reproductive-aged Patients With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: a Randomized, Parallel Study [NCT03336840]90 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-06-01Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Perioperative Paclitaxel in Patients With Gastric Adenocarcinoma and Carcinomatosis or Positive Cytology [NCT05977998]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-08Recruiting
The Check Trial: A Comparison of Headache Treatment in the ED: Compazine Versus Ketamine. A Multi-Center, Randomized Double-Blind, Clinical Control Trial. [NCT02657031]Phase 454 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-17Completed
An Open Label Crossover Pharmacokinetic Trial of Naproxen Sodium and Diphenhydramine Hydrochloride Soft Capsules Versus Naproxen Sodium and Diphenhydramine Hydrochloride Tablets in Healthy Adult Subjects Under Fed Conditions [NCT03424135]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-02Completed
A PHASE 3, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, CROSS-OVER, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, SINGLE DOSE, CLINICAL TRIAL TO ASSESS THE NEXT-DAY RESIDUAL EFFECTS OF GABAPENTIN, DIPHENHYDRAMINE AND TRIAZOLAM ON SIMULATED DRIVING PERFORMANCE IN NORMAL VOLUNTEERS [NCT01888497]Phase 359 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-29Completed
A Phase III Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Three-Arm Study of Doxepin and a Topical Rinse in the Treatment of Acute Oral Mucositis Pain in Patients Receiving Radiotherapy With or Without Chemotherapy [NCT02229539]Phase 3275 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blinded Controlled Trial of an N-Methyl D-Aspartate Antagonist as a Rapidly-Acting Antidepressant in Depressed Emergency Department Patients [NCT02106325]Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
Diphenhydramine as Adjuvant Therapy for Acute Migraine. A Randomized Trial. [NCT01825941]Phase 4208 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
An Open-label, Multicenter, Phase 2 Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Daratumumab in Subjects With Multiple Myeloma Who Have Received at Least 3 Prior Lines of Therapy (Including a Proteasome Inhibitor and IMiD) or Are Double Refractory to a [NCT01985126]Phase 2124 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-27Completed
A Pilot Study to Assess Impact of Low Dose Melphalan on Disease Burden Measured by Next Generation Sequencing Before Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplant (AHCT) for Multiple Myeloma Patients [NCT05013437]Early Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-31Recruiting
Hydromorphone Versus Prochlorperazine + Diphenhydramine for Treatment of Acute Migraine. A Randomized, Emergency Department Based, Comparative Efficacy Study [NCT02389829]Phase 4127 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-31Completed
Rituximab Plus Cyclophosphamide Followed by Belimumab for the Treatment of Lupus Nephritis (ITN055AI) [NCT02260934]Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-09Completed
"A Randomized Trial of the Effectiveness of Topical ABH Gel (Ativan®, Lorazepam; Benadryl®, Diphenhydramine; and Haldol®, Haloperidol Gel) Versus Placebo in Patients With Nausea" [NCT01556932]22 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00030992 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT00030992 (2) [back to overview]Response Rate
NCT00076752 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT00076752 (16) [back to overview]Relapse-free Complete Clinical Response
NCT00076752 (16) [back to overview]Absolute Lymphocyte Count
NCT00076752 (16) [back to overview]Absolute Neutrophil Count
NCT00076752 (16) [back to overview]Anti-Double Stranded Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Antibody
NCT00076752 (16) [back to overview]Anti-Nuclear Antibody
NCT00076752 (16) [back to overview]Anti-Smith-Ribonuclear Protein Antibody
NCT00076752 (16) [back to overview]Cluster of Differentiation 19 (CD19) + Cells
NCT00076752 (16) [back to overview]Cluster of Differentiation 3 (CD3) + Cells
NCT00076752 (16) [back to overview]Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4) + Cells
NCT00076752 (16) [back to overview]Cluster of Differentiation 8 (CD8) + Cells
NCT00076752 (16) [back to overview]Extractable Nuclear Antigen (ENA)
NCT00076752 (16) [back to overview]Natural Killer Cells
NCT00076752 (16) [back to overview]Platelet Count
NCT00076752 (16) [back to overview]Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI)
NCT00076752 (16) [back to overview]White Blood Cells
NCT00078559 (14) [back to overview]Number of Severe Acute Rejections Stratified by Sirolimus Withdrawal Status
NCT00078559 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced Graft Loss Stratified by Sirolimus Withdrawal Status
NCT00078559 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants Requiring Anti-lymphocyte Therapy for an Acute Rejection, Stratified by Sirolimus Withdrawal Status
NCT00078559 (14) [back to overview]Number of Alemtuzumab Associated Adverse Events, Stratified by Sirolimus Withdrawal Status
NCT00078559 (14) [back to overview]Number of Acute Rejections in All Enrolled Participants Following Sirolimus Withdrawal
NCT00078559 (14) [back to overview]Number of Acute Rejections in All Enrolled Participants
NCT00078559 (14) [back to overview]Number of Acute Rejections Between Initiation of Sirolimus Withdrawal and End of Study
NCT00078559 (14) [back to overview]Change in Renal Function as Measured by Serum Creatinine, Stratified by Withdrawal Status
NCT00078559 (14) [back to overview]Time From Transplantation to Acute Rejection in Participants for Whom Acute Rejection Occurred During the 1 Year Post-transplant Period
NCT00078559 (14) [back to overview]Number of Deaths Stratified by Sirolimus Withdrawal Status
NCT00078559 (14) [back to overview]Time From Transplantation to Acute Rejection in Participants for Whom Sirolimus Withdrawal Was Not Initiated
NCT00078559 (14) [back to overview]Number of Tacrolimus Associated Adverse Events, Stratified by Sirolimus Withdrawal Status
NCT00078559 (14) [back to overview]Number of Sirolimus Associated Adverse Events, Stratified by Sirolimus Withdrawal Status
NCT00078559 (14) [back to overview]Number of Side Effects of Conventional Immunosuppression, Stratified by Withdrawal Status
NCT00137969 (8) [back to overview]Change in SLE Expanded Health Survey Physical Function Score From Baseline
NCT00137969 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Achieved a Major Clinical Response (MCR), Partial Clinical Response (PCR), or Nonclinical Response (NCR) Defined by British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Scores Over The 52-week Treatment Period
NCT00137969 (8) [back to overview]Time-adjusted Area Under The Curve Minus Baseline (AUCMB) of BILAG Score Over The 52-week Treatment Period
NCT00137969 (8) [back to overview]Time to First Moderate or Severe Flare
NCT00137969 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Achieved an MCR in The ITT Population
NCT00137969 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Achieved an MCR (Excluding PCR)
NCT00137969 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Achieved a PCR (Including MCR)
NCT00137969 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Achieved a BILAG C or Better in All Domains
NCT00186628 (4) [back to overview]Mortality
NCT00186628 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00186628 (4) [back to overview]Incidence of Relapse
NCT00186628 (4) [back to overview]Chronic Graft-vs-Host Disease (cGvHD)
NCT00226941 (7) [back to overview]Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) - Number of Participants Affected
NCT00226941 (7) [back to overview]Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) - Number of DLTs by Treatment Group
NCT00226941 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00226941 (7) [back to overview]Tumor Downstaging at Surgical Resection
NCT00226941 (7) [back to overview]Time-to-Progression (TTP)
NCT00226941 (7) [back to overview]Survival at 5 Years
NCT00226941 (7) [back to overview]Pathologic Response Rate
NCT00282347 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Anti-double-stranded DNA at Week 52
NCT00282347 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Expanded Health Survey Physical Function Score at Week 52
NCT00282347 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Renal Response at Week 24 and Maintained it to Week 52
NCT00282347 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Renal Response at Week 52
NCT00282347 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Baseline Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio of > 3.0 Who Achieved a Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio of < 1.0 at Week 52
NCT00282347 (9) [back to overview]British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Index Score Over 52 Weeks
NCT00282347 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in C3 and C4 Complement Levels at Week 52
NCT00282347 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Renal Response (CRR), a Partial Renal Response (PRR), or no Renal Response (NRR) at Week 52
NCT00282347 (9) [back to overview]Time to Achieve a Complete Renal Response
NCT00381810 (1) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event
NCT00429702 (2) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Requiring Rescue Medication for Breakthrough Nausea or Emesis After Completion of the First Course of Emetogenic Chemotherapy
NCT00429702 (2) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Requiring Rescue Medication for Breakthrough Nausea or Emesis During Inpatient Chemotherapy
NCT00475306 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Akathisia
NCT00475306 (2) [back to overview]Nausea Scale
NCT00482053 (7) [back to overview]Median Time to Platelet Engraftment After Autologous Transplant
NCT00482053 (7) [back to overview]Median Time to Neutrophil Engraftment After Autologous Transplant
NCT00482053 (7) [back to overview]Median Time to Neutrophil Engraftment After Allogeneic Transplant
NCT00482053 (7) [back to overview]Median Time to Platelet Engraftment After Allogeneic Transplant
NCT00482053 (7) [back to overview]Incidence of Chronic Graft vs Host Disease (GvHD)
NCT00482053 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00482053 (7) [back to overview]Event-free Survival (EFS) Per Protocol
NCT00490009 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) Rate
NCT00490009 (3) [back to overview]Clinical Response Rate
NCT00490009 (3) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT00515073 (1) [back to overview]Overall Survival at 2 Years and 5 Years
NCT00588159 (6) [back to overview]Average Pain Score With Coughing the First Morning Following Surgery
NCT00588159 (6) [back to overview]Average Pain Score With Coughing on Second Morning After Surgery
NCT00588159 (6) [back to overview]Opioid Consumption in Second 24 Hour Hour Period (Hours 24-48) Postoperatively
NCT00588159 (6) [back to overview]Average Pain Score at Rest
NCT00588159 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Pain at Thoracotomy Site 3 Months Postoperatively
NCT00588159 (6) [back to overview]Opioid Consumption in First 24 Hours Postoperatively
NCT00590590 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overall Vulvar Vestibulitis Symptoms Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at End of Treatment (12 Weeks) [0 = No Symptoms and 100 = As Bad as They Can be]
NCT00590590 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overall Vulvar Vestibulitis Syndrome (VVS)-Related Discomfort Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at End of Treatment (12 Weeks) [0 = No Discomfort and 100 = Most Severe Discomfort]
NCT00590590 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Tenderness (on a 0- to 3-point Scale) on Palpation at End of Treatment (12 Weeks) [Scale Rates the Severity of Pain; 0 =Absent and 3 = Severe]
NCT00590590 (6) [back to overview]Mean Marinoff Dyspareunia Scale Score (MDSS) at End of Treatment (12 Weeks)
NCT00590590 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Marinoff Dyspareunia Scale Score at End of Treatment (12 Weeks)
NCT00590590 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overall Intercourse-Related Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at End of Treatment (12 Weeks) [0 = No Pain and 100 = Most Severe Pain]
NCT00638443 (12) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve
NCT00638443 (12) [back to overview]Swiss Spinal Stenosis- Physical Function
NCT00638443 (12) [back to overview]Time to First Symptoms of Moderate Pain
NCT00638443 (12) [back to overview]Total Distance
NCT00638443 (12) [back to overview]Recovery Time
NCT00638443 (12) [back to overview]Final Pain as Measured by NRS
NCT00638443 (12) [back to overview]Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
NCT00638443 (12) [back to overview]Modified Brief Pain Inventory (mBPI)- Interference Score
NCT00638443 (12) [back to overview]Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Score
NCT00638443 (12) [back to overview]Patient Global Assessment (PGA)
NCT00638443 (12) [back to overview]Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire
NCT00638443 (12) [back to overview]Swiss Spinal Stenosis (SSS) Score- Symptom Severity
NCT00641797 (1) [back to overview]Likert Scale for Satisfaction
NCT00655642 (1) [back to overview]Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score for Nausea. This Was Calculated by Subtracting the Patient's Reported Score on the 30 Minute VAS From the Patient's Reported VAS Score on Their Baseline VAS.
NCT00682734 (1) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Score
NCT00771875 (7) [back to overview]Incidence of Death
NCT00771875 (7) [back to overview]Incidence of Post Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD)
NCT00771875 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Allografts With C4d Diffuse Positive Pretreatment Biopsy
NCT00771875 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Allografts With C4d Focal Positive Pretreatment Biopsy
NCT00771875 (7) [back to overview]Mean Serum Creatinine
NCT00771875 (7) [back to overview]Renal Allograft Survival
NCT00771875 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients in Each Group With Any of the Following: Rejection Reversal or Recurrent Rejection
NCT00866788 (11) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Omalizumab
NCT00866788 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Immunogenicity
NCT00866788 (11) [back to overview]Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of Omalizumab
NCT00866788 (11) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Adverse Events by Severity
NCT00866788 (11) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Omalizumab
NCT00866788 (11) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time of Dosing Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC-Inf)
NCT00866788 (11) [back to overview]Change in the Weekly Pruritus Score From Baseline to Week 4
NCT00866788 (11) [back to overview]Change in the Weekly Score for Number of Hives From Baseline to Week 4
NCT00866788 (11) [back to overview]Change in the Weekly Score for Sleep Interference From Baseline to Week 4
NCT00866788 (11) [back to overview]Change in the Weekly Score for the Amount of Rescue Medication From Baseline to Week 4
NCT00866788 (11) [back to overview]Change in Urticaria Activity Score 7 (UAS7) From Baseline to Week 4
NCT00887640 (5) [back to overview]Mean Percent of N-cadherin Expression at Baseline and 8 Weeks of Treatment.
NCT00887640 (5) [back to overview]Safety and Tolerability of Temsirolimus
NCT00887640 (5) [back to overview]Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00887640 (5) [back to overview]Maximum Rate of Change of Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA).
NCT00887640 (5) [back to overview]Change in Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) Counts in Men With Metastatic Treatment-refractory Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.
NCT00899847 (8) [back to overview]Event-free Survival (EFS)
NCT00899847 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00899847 (8) [back to overview]Partial Response Rate (PRR)
NCT00899847 (8) [back to overview]Median Time to Engraftment After Allo-PBSC Transplant
NCT00899847 (8) [back to overview]Median Time to Engraftment After Auto-PBSC Transplant
NCT00899847 (8) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate (CRR)
NCT00899847 (8) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT00899847 (8) [back to overview]Incidence of Graft Versus Host Disease (GvHD)
NCT00923910 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3
NCT00923910 (7) [back to overview]Wilm's Tumor (WT1) Delayed-type Hypersensitivity (DTH)
NCT00923910 (7) [back to overview]Time to Immune Response
NCT00923910 (7) [back to overview]Wilm's Tumor 1 (WT1) Enzyme-Linked Immunospot (ELISpot)
NCT00923910 (7) [back to overview]Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin (KLH) Delayed-type Hypersensitivity (DTH)
NCT00923910 (7) [back to overview]Toxicity
NCT00923910 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Progressive Disease
NCT00991809 (2) [back to overview]Pain Tolerance
NCT00991809 (2) [back to overview]Pain Threshold
NCT01017731 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Drug-Related Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT01017731 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Cycle 3 in QT/Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Prolongation in Participants
NCT01017731 (6) [back to overview]Area Under Concentration (AUC) During Cycle 1
NCT01017731 (6) [back to overview]Area Under Concentration (AUC) During Cycle 3
NCT01017731 (6) [back to overview]Maximum Concentration (Cmax) During Cycle 3
NCT01017731 (6) [back to overview]Maximum Concentration (Cmax) During Cycle 1
NCT01086540 (19) [back to overview]Change in Severity of Raynaud's Phenomenon
NCT01086540 (19) [back to overview]Number of Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Through Week 48
NCT01086540 (19) [back to overview]Number of New Digital Ulcers
NCT01086540 (19) [back to overview]Oxygen Saturation Levels at Week 24 and Week 48
NCT01086540 (19) [back to overview]Time to Clinical Worsening
NCT01086540 (19) [back to overview]Time to the Change or Addition of New Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) Therapeutic Medications
NCT01086540 (19) [back to overview]Treatment-Related Mortality: From Treatment Initiation to Week 48
NCT01086540 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Distance Walked During a Six Minute Walk Test at Week 24 and Week 48
NCT01086540 (19) [back to overview]Number of Infusion-Related Toxicities
NCT01086540 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Measured by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): Mental Component Summary Score
NCT01086540 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Measured by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): Physical Component Summary Score
NCT01086540 (19) [back to overview]Change in Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity (DLCO)
NCT01086540 (19) [back to overview]Change in Quality of Life as Measured by the Disability Index of the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI)
NCT01086540 (19) [back to overview]All-Cause Mortality: From Treatment Initiation to Week 104
NCT01086540 (19) [back to overview]All-Cause Mortality: From Treatment Initiation to Week 48
NCT01086540 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Distance Walked During a Six Minute Walk Test
NCT01086540 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance Measured by Right Heart Catheterization at Week 24
NCT01086540 (19) [back to overview]Number of Infection-Related Adverse Events (AEs) Through Week 48
NCT01086540 (19) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance Measured by Right Heart Catheterization
NCT01118273 (26) [back to overview]Overall Rating of Pain Relief
NCT01118273 (26) [back to overview]Number of Times Participants Took Rescue Medication
NCT01118273 (26) [back to overview]Karolinska Sleep Diary - Well Rested
NCT01118273 (26) [back to overview]Karolinska Sleep Diary - Sufficient Sleep
NCT01118273 (26) [back to overview]Karolinska Sleep Diary - Sleep Quality
NCT01118273 (26) [back to overview]Karolinska Sleep Diary - Premature Awakening
NCT01118273 (26) [back to overview]Karolinska Sleep Diary - Easiness to Fall Asleep
NCT01118273 (26) [back to overview]Karolinska Sleep Diary - Ease of Awakening
NCT01118273 (26) [back to overview]Karolinska Sleep Diary - Calmness of Sleep
NCT01118273 (26) [back to overview]Global Assessment of Study Medication as a Sleep-aid
NCT01118273 (26) [back to overview]Global Assessment of Study Medication as a Pain Reliever
NCT01118273 (26) [back to overview]Cumulative Proportion of Participants Taking Rescue Medication by Hour
NCT01118273 (26) [back to overview]Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO) Measured by Actigraphy
NCT01118273 (26) [back to overview]Wake Episode Measured by Actigraphy
NCT01118273 (26) [back to overview]Total Wake Time Measured by Actigraphy
NCT01118273 (26) [back to overview]Total Sleep Time Measured by Actigraphy
NCT01118273 (26) [back to overview]Total Sleep Time by Subject Assessment
NCT01118273 (26) [back to overview]Time to Rescue Medication
NCT01118273 (26) [back to overview]Sleep Quality Index
NCT01118273 (26) [back to overview]Sleep Latency Measured by Actigraphy
NCT01118273 (26) [back to overview]Sleep Efficiency Measured by Actigraphy
NCT01118273 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score
NCT01118273 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Categorical Pain Rating Scale Score
NCT01118273 (26) [back to overview]Activity Mean Measured by Actigraphy
NCT01118273 (26) [back to overview]Overall Rating of Severity in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score
NCT01118273 (26) [back to overview]Overall Rating of Severity in Categorical Pain Rating Scale Score
NCT01119222 (2) [back to overview]Interpolated Average Pain (0-8 Hours)
NCT01119222 (2) [back to overview]Average Pain (0-120 Seconds): Cold Pain Test Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
NCT01158820 (8) [back to overview]Total Fentanyl
NCT01158820 (8) [back to overview]Total Midazolam
NCT01158820 (8) [back to overview]Conversion to General Anesthesia
NCT01158820 (8) [back to overview]Decreased Minute Ventilation
NCT01158820 (8) [back to overview]Desaturation (Cumulative)
NCT01158820 (8) [back to overview]Desaturation (Longest)
NCT01158820 (8) [back to overview]Endoscopist Satisfaction
NCT01158820 (8) [back to overview]Patient Satisfaction
NCT01204255 (2) [back to overview]Side Effects
NCT01204255 (2) [back to overview]Lorazepam, Diphenyhydramine, Haloperidol Absorption
NCT01264939 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Angioedema-free Days From Week 4 to Week 12
NCT01264939 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Complete Responders (UAS7 = 0) at Week 12
NCT01264939 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a UAS7 Score ≤ 6 at Week 12
NCT01264939 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT01264939 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Weekly Itch Severity Score MID Responders at Week 12
NCT01264939 (11) [back to overview]Time to Minimally Important Difference (MID) Response in the Weekly Itch Severity Score by Week 12
NCT01264939 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Overall Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 12
NCT01264939 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Urticaria Activity Score Over 7 Days (UAS7)
NCT01264939 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Weekly Itch Severity Score
NCT01264939 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Weekly Number of Hives Score
NCT01264939 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Weekly Size of the Largest Hive Score
NCT01293968 (1) [back to overview]Effect of Ibuprofen, Diphenhydramine and Aluminium MgS Measured on Decrease in Pain Level and Burning Sensation
NCT01332318 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) on the Brief Assessment of Cognition (BAC) Scaled Token Motor Task Test Score
NCT01332318 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in Overall Average Speed
NCT01332318 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in Overall Average Lane Position
NCT01332318 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in Brake Reaction Time
NCT01332318 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Post Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ) Responses at Day 14
NCT01332318 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Number of Simulated Crashes on Days 14 (Evening), 15 (Morning After Dose), and 16 (Tmax)
NCT01332318 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants in Each Category of the Participant-Rated Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at Day 14
NCT01332318 (28) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With no Reported RLS Symptoms During the 24-hour RLS Record at Day 14
NCT01332318 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants With no Reported RLS Symptoms During Each of the 4-hour Periods From the 24-hour RLS Record at Day 14
NCT01332318 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Day -1) in Overall Lane Position Variability (LPV) on Day 16 (Tmax)
NCT01332318 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants in Each Category of the Investigator-Rated Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at Day 14
NCT01332318 (28) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) on the Pittsburgh Sleep Diary (PghSD) Sleep Onset Items
NCT01332318 (28) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in the Pittsburgh Sleep Diary (PghSD) Sleep Quality
NCT01332318 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Score
NCT01332318 (28) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline (Day -1) at Day 14 in the International Restless Legs Syndrome (IRLS) Rating Scale Total Score
NCT01332318 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in Overall Lane Position Variability (LPV)
NCT01332318 (28) [back to overview]Median Time to Onset of a Participant's First RLS Symptoms Using the 24-hour RLS Symptom Record at Day 14
NCT01332318 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Responded to Treatment Based on Scores on the Investigator-Rated CGI-I at Day 14
NCT01332318 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) on the Brief Assessment of Cognition (BAC) Scaled Tower of London (TOL) Score
NCT01332318 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) on the Brief Assessment of Cognition (BAC) Scaled Symbol Coding Test Score
NCT01332318 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) on the Brief Assessment of Cognition (BAC) Scaled Verbal Memory Test Score
NCT01332318 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) on the Brief Assessment of Cognition (BAC) Scaled Verbal Fluency Test Score
NCT01332318 (28) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Responded to Treatment Based on Scores on the Participant-Rated CGI-I at Day 14
NCT01332318 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) on the Brief Assessment of Cognition (BAC) Scaled Digit Sequencing Score (DSS)
NCT01332318 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) on the Brief Assessment of Cognition (BAC) Composite Score
NCT01332318 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in the Pittsburgh Sleep Diary (PghSD) Total Sleep Time Item
NCT01332318 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in the Alertness Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score
NCT01332318 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in Overall Speed Variability
NCT01332630 (1) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01392183 (2) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01392183 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01451762 (1) [back to overview]Quality of Recovery 40 at 24 Hours
NCT01474915 (2) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With a Complete Response/Complete Control During the First 24 Hours After Neurological Surgery Under General Anesthesia
NCT01474915 (2) [back to overview]Post Operative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) Scores on a Verbal Response Scale
NCT01510379 (2) [back to overview]Quantify the Amounts of Phenergan Used Between the Two Groups.
NCT01510379 (2) [back to overview]Comparison of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Scores Between Groups Treated With a ReletexTM Device and Those Without the Device.
NCT01556932 (1) [back to overview]The Change in Numeric Rating Scale in Self-reported Nausea From Baseline Minus 60 Minutes of Treatment.
NCT01737931 (4) [back to overview]Skin Irritation Score After Patch Removal
NCT01737931 (4) [back to overview]Itching of Application Site Evaluated by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
NCT01737931 (4) [back to overview]Itching of Application Site Evaluated by VAS After Patch Removal
NCT01737931 (4) [back to overview]Skin Irritation Score of the Application Site
NCT01769586 (1) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Achieve Adequate Sedation to Allow Colonoscopy (Defined as MOAA/S ≤3)
NCT01825941 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Sustained Headache Relief Assessed by Self-evaluation
NCT01846455 (10) [back to overview]Apparent Body Clearance (CL/F) of Buprenorphine and Naloxone
NCT01846455 (10) [back to overview]Apparent Volume of Distribution During Terminal Phase (Vz/F) of Buprenorphine and Naloxone
NCT01846455 (10) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Buprenorphine, Norbuprenorphine, Naloxone and Naloxone-3-β-D-Glucuronide
NCT01846455 (10) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last) of Buprenorphine, Norbuprenorphine, Naloxone and Naloxone-3-β-D-Glucuronide
NCT01846455 (10) [back to overview]Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Buprenorphine, Norbuprenorphine, Naloxone and Naloxone-3-β-D-Glucuronide
NCT01846455 (10) [back to overview]Time of the Last Measureable Plasma Concentration (Tlast) of Buprenorphine, Norbuprenorphine, Naloxone and Naloxone-3-β-D-Glucuronide
NCT01846455 (10) [back to overview]Terminal Phase Elimination Rate-Constant (λz) of Buprenorphine, Norbuprenorphine, Naloxone and Naloxone-3-β-D-Glucuronide
NCT01846455 (10) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Buprenorphine, Norbuprenorphine, Naloxone and Naloxone-3-β-D-Glucuronide
NCT01846455 (10) [back to overview]Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of Buprenorphine, Norbuprenorphine, Naloxone and Naloxone-3-β-D-Glucuronide
NCT01846455 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity Due to Extrapolation (%AUCextrap) of Buprenorphine, Norbuprenorphine, Naloxone and Naloxone-3-β-D-Glucuronide
NCT01888497 (3) [back to overview]Speed Deviation
NCT01888497 (3) [back to overview]Lane Exceedance
NCT01888497 (3) [back to overview]Standard Deviation of Lateral Position (SDLP)
NCT01905631 (1) [back to overview]Reduction of Itching in AD
NCT01967433 (7) [back to overview]24 Hour Follow up Amnesia Score
NCT01967433 (7) [back to overview]Dosage of Midazolam
NCT01967433 (7) [back to overview]Dosage of Fentanyl
NCT01967433 (7) [back to overview]24 Hour Follow up Pain Score
NCT01967433 (7) [back to overview]Quality of Sedation
NCT01967433 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT01967433 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Procedure
NCT01968694 (4) [back to overview]Change in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
NCT01968694 (4) [back to overview]Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
NCT01968694 (4) [back to overview]Change in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): Pain on Average
NCT01968694 (4) [back to overview]Change in Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire 2
NCT01985126 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT01985126 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit
NCT01985126 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Response
NCT01985126 (7) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT01985126 (7) [back to overview]Time to Disease Progression
NCT01985126 (7) [back to overview]Time to Response
NCT01985126 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT02029638 (18) [back to overview]Duration in Days of Adverse Events (AEs)- Including Infection, Wound Complications, Post-transplant Diabetes, Hemorrhagic Cystitis and Malignancy
NCT02029638 (18) [back to overview]Histological Severity of Biopsies Demonstrating Acute Rejection as Defined by Banff 2007 Classification Renal Allograft Pathology
NCT02029638 (18) [back to overview]Number of Transplanted Participants With Engraftment Syndrome
NCT02029638 (18) [back to overview]Number of Transplanted Participants With Chronic T Cell-Mediated or Antibody-Mediated Rejection
NCT02029638 (18) [back to overview]Number of Transplanted Participants With Acute Renal Allograft Rejection
NCT02029638 (18) [back to overview]Number of Transplanted Participants Who Remained Off Immunosuppression for at Least 52 Weeks, Including Those in Whom the 52 Week Biopsy Was Not Performed
NCT02029638 (18) [back to overview]Number of Transplanted Participants Who Died
NCT02029638 (18) [back to overview]Percent of Participants Who Achieved Operational Tolerance
NCT02029638 (18) [back to overview]Number of Transplanted Participants Who Developed Donor-Specific Antibody During Study Participation
NCT02029638 (18) [back to overview]Number of Transplanted Participants Who Developed Donor- Specific Antibody After Initiation of Immunosuppression Withdrawal
NCT02029638 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants Free From Return to Immunosuppression for the Duration of the Study
NCT02029638 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing an Incidence of Graft-versus-Host Disease Post-Transplant
NCT02029638 (18) [back to overview]Number of Days From Transplant to Platelet Count Recovery
NCT02029638 (18) [back to overview]Number of Days From Neutrophil Nadir to Absolute Neutrophil Recovery
NCT02029638 (18) [back to overview]Duration in Days of Graft-versus-Host Disease in Transplanted Participants
NCT02029638 (18) [back to overview]Number of Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity- Including Infection, Wound Complications, Post-Transplant Diabetes, Hemorrhagic Cystitis and Malignancy
NCT02029638 (18) [back to overview]Number of Adverse Events (AEs)- Including Infection, Wound Complications, Post-transplant Diabetes, Hemorrhagic Cystitis and Malignancy
NCT02029638 (18) [back to overview]Number of Days Post-Transplant to the First Episode of Acute Rejection Requiring Treatment
NCT02061293 (21) [back to overview]Percent of Participants Achieving WHO Risk Drinking Level Decrease of at Least 1 Level
NCT02061293 (21) [back to overview]Percent of Participants Achieving No Heavy Drinking Days
NCT02061293 (21) [back to overview]Percent of Heavy Drinking Days
NCT02061293 (21) [back to overview]Short Inventory of Problems (SIP-2R) Score
NCT02061293 (21) [back to overview]Short Inventory of Problems (SIP-2R) Score
NCT02061293 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Abstinence From Drinking
NCT02061293 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Abstinence From Drinking
NCT02061293 (21) [back to overview]Percent of Participants Achieving WHO Risk Drinking Level Decrease of at Least 3 Levels
NCT02061293 (21) [back to overview]Percent of Participants Achieving WHO Risk Drinking Level Decrease of at Least 3 Levels
NCT02061293 (21) [back to overview]Percent of Participants Achieving WHO Risk Drinking Level Decrease of at Least 2 Levels
NCT02061293 (21) [back to overview]Percent of Heavy Drinking Days
NCT02061293 (21) [back to overview]Percent of Heavy Drinking Days
NCT02061293 (21) [back to overview]Percent of Drinking Days
NCT02061293 (21) [back to overview]Drinks Per Day
NCT02061293 (21) [back to overview]Drinks Per Day
NCT02061293 (21) [back to overview]Percent of Participants Achieving No Heavy Drinking Days
NCT02061293 (21) [back to overview]Percent of Drinking Days
NCT02061293 (21) [back to overview]Percent of Participants Achieving WHO Risk Drinking Level Decrease of at Least 1 Level
NCT02061293 (21) [back to overview]Percent of Participants Achieving WHO Risk Drinking Level Decrease of at Least 2 Levels
NCT02061293 (21) [back to overview]Percent of Drinking Days
NCT02061293 (21) [back to overview]Drinks Per Day
NCT02062710 (1) [back to overview]Change in Cough Reflex Sensitivity to Capsaicin
NCT02106325 (9) [back to overview]Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
NCT02106325 (9) [back to overview]Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSSI)
NCT02106325 (9) [back to overview]Change in Treatment Alliance Score
NCT02106325 (9) [back to overview]Evaluate the Effects of Ketamine on Depressive Symptomatology by Measuring Change in Score on the Montgomery-Asberg Depressive Rating Scale
NCT02106325 (9) [back to overview]Hamilton Depression Scale (Ham-D)
NCT02106325 (9) [back to overview]Inpatient Treatment Alliance Scale (ITAS)
NCT02106325 (9) [back to overview]Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale Suicide Ideation Item (MADRS-SI)
NCT02106325 (9) [back to overview]Length of Inpatient Stay
NCT02106325 (9) [back to overview]Outpatient Follow-up Compliance
NCT02136420 (5) [back to overview]Yaw Perceptual Motion Threshold
NCT02136420 (5) [back to overview]Roll Perceptual Motion Threshold
NCT02136420 (5) [back to overview]Interaural Perceptual Motion Threshold
NCT02136420 (5) [back to overview]Percent Change in Roll Tilt Perception After Exposure to Hypogravity
NCT02136420 (5) [back to overview]Percent Change in Manual Control Performance After Exposure to Hypogravity
NCT02142712 (2) [back to overview]Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)
NCT02142712 (2) [back to overview]National Institutes of Health Stroke Severity (NIHSS) Scale
NCT02188719 (5) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Grade 2 or Higher Hematologic Adverse Events (AEs) of Anemia, Neutropenia, and/or Thrombocytopenia
NCT02188719 (5) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Attributable to the Donor Alloantigen Reactive Tregs (darTregs) Infusion
NCT02188719 (5) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Infectious Adverse Event(s)
NCT02188719 (5) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Wound Complication(s) Adverse Event(s)
NCT02188719 (5) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Biopsy-Proven Acute and/or Chronic Rejection
NCT02229539 (1) [back to overview]Mean Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Total Pain Reduction
NCT02260934 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Sustained Complete Response
NCT02260934 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure by Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96
NCT02260934 (15) [back to overview]Count of Participants: Frequency of Non-renal Flares by Week 24
NCT02260934 (15) [back to overview]Count of Participants: Frequency of Non-renal Flares by Week 48
NCT02260934 (15) [back to overview]Count of Participants: Frequency of Non-renal Flares by Week 96
NCT02260934 (15) [back to overview]Frequency of Specific Adverse Events of Interest By Event by Week 96
NCT02260934 (15) [back to overview]Frequency of Specific Adverse Events of Interest By Participant, By Week 96
NCT02260934 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Hypocomplementemic for Complement Component C3 at Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96
NCT02260934 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Hypocomplementemic for Complement Component C4 at Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96
NCT02260934 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response at Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96
NCT02260934 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With an Negative Anti-dsDNA Result at Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96
NCT02260934 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With an Overall Response at Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96
NCT02260934 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With At Least One Grade 3 or Higher Infectious Adverse Event By Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
NCT02260934 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With B Cell Reconstitution at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
NCT02260934 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Grade 4 Hypogammaglobulinemia by Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96
NCT02295280 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adequate Relief of Headache as a Measure of Efficacy
NCT02339155 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate at Indicated Time Points
NCT02339155 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Temperature at Indicated Time Points
NCT02339155 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Any Non-serious Adverse Event (AE)
NCT02339155 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters Outside Normal Range
NCT02339155 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters Outside Normal Range
NCT02339155 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Urinalysis Parameters
NCT02339155 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Seroconvert, at Weeks 4, 8, and 26 (Days 29, 57 and 183) After the First AVA Dose, Between the AVA Alone and the AVA With Raxibacumab Treatment Groups
NCT02339155 (11) [back to overview]Ratio of GMC of Anti-PA Ab at Weeks 8 and 26 (Days 57 and 183) After the First AVA Dose, Between the AVA Alone and AVA With Raxibacumab Treatment Groups
NCT02339155 (11) [back to overview]Ratio of Geometric Mean Concentrations (GMC) of Anti-protective Antigen (PA) Antibody (Ab) at 4 Weeks (Day 29) After the First AVA Dose (Prior to the Third AVA Dose), Between the AVA Alone and the AVA With Raxibacumab Treatment Groups
NCT02339155 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Indicated Time Points
NCT02339155 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Indicated Time Points
NCT02363946 (15) [back to overview]Mean Percentage Change in Circulating Blood Levels of Cytokines 2 Hours Post-Dose
NCT02363946 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants With AAT Reduction > 30% From Baseline (First Occurrence)
NCT02363946 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Treatment-Emergent Abnormalities in Laboratory Values
NCT02363946 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Treatment-Emergent Abnormalities in Vital Signs, Electrocardiograms (ECGs), Pulmonary Function, Physical Findings, and Other Observations
NCT02363946 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), or Discontinuations Due to TEAEs
NCT02363946 (15) [back to overview]Percentage Reduction From Baseline of AAT Up to Day 29
NCT02363946 (15) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics of ARC-AAT: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From From Zero to Infinity (AUCinf) for the Analytes AD00370 and ARC-MLP (Part A)
NCT02363946 (15) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics of ARC-AAT: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to Time 24 Hours (AUC0-24) for the Analytes AD00370 and ARC-MLP (Part A)
NCT02363946 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Return From Nadir AAT Blood Levels to Above Normal or Within 15% of Baseline in > 100 Days
NCT02363946 (15) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics of ARC-AAT: Half-Life (t1/2) for the Analytes AD00370 and ARC-MLP (Part A)
NCT02363946 (15) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics of ARC-AAT: Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) for the Analytes AD00370 and ARC-MLP (Part A)
NCT02363946 (15) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics of ARC-AAT: Terminal Elimination Rate Constant Obtained From the Slope of the Line (Kel) for the Analytes AD00370 and ARC-MLP (Part A)
NCT02363946 (15) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics of ARC-AAT: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for the Analytes AD00370 and ARC-Melittin-Like Peptide (MLP; Part A)
NCT02363946 (15) [back to overview]Mean Percentage Change in Circulating Blood Levels of Complement Factors 2 Hours Post-Dose
NCT02363946 (15) [back to overview]Maximum Percentage Reduction in Mean AAT (Nadir of Mean AAT)
NCT02389829 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Achieved Short Term Headache Relief, Assessed by Telphone Questionnaire
NCT02389829 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Sustained Headache Relief Assessed by Self-evaluation
NCT02389829 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Needing Rescue Medication as Assessed by Questionnaire
NCT02389829 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Achieved Short Term Headache Freedom; Assessed by Telephone Questionnaire
NCT02452528 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths, and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT02474199 (8) [back to overview]Proportion of Liver Transplant Recipients Who Are Able to Reduce Calcineurin Inhibitor Dosing by 75 Percent and Discontinue a Second Immunosuppression Drug (if Applicable) With Stable Liver Function Tests (LFTs) for ≥ 12 Weeks
NCT02474199 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Efficacy Status Post Receipt of a Single Intravenous (IV) Dose of Donor Alloantigen Reactive Regulatory T Cells (darTregs)
NCT02474199 (8) [back to overview]Number of Liver Transplant Recipients Who Experience the Composite Outcome
NCT02474199 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experience at Least One Episode of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection, Clinical Acute Rejection, or Chronic Rejection
NCT02474199 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Deemed Attributable to darTreg Infusion
NCT02474199 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Any Malignancy
NCT02474199 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Study Defined Grade 3 or Higher Infections
NCT02474199 (8) [back to overview]Count of Participants by Severity of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection and/or Chronic Rejection
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Change in eGFR Between Post-transplant Nadir and 24 Months as Measured by CKD-EPI
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Change in eGFR Between Post-transplant Nadir and 24 Months as Measured by MDRD
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Creatinine Reduction Ratio (CRR), Defined as the First Creatinine on Day 2 Divided by he First Creatinine After Surgery
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Creatinine Reduction Ratio (CRR), Defined as the First Creatinine on Day 5 Divided by the First Creatinine After Surgery.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Days From Transplantation Until Event (ACR, AMR, or Hospitalization for Infection and/or Malignancy)
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Duration of Delayed Graft Function (DGF), Defined as Time From Transplantation to the Last Required Dialysis Treatment.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]eGFR Values as Measured by CKD-EPI
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]eGFR Values as Measured by MDRD
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Number of Dialysis Sessions.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants That Required at Least One Dialysis Treatment.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Any Infection Requiring Hospitalization or Resulting in Death.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With BANFF Chronicity Scores > or Equal 2 on the 24 Month Biopsy.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection (AMR)
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection (AMR).
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection AMR or Suspicious for AMR
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection AMR or Suspicious for AMR.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Cellular Rejection (BPAR)
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Cellular Rejection (BPAR) or Borderline Rejection
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Cellular Rejection (BPAR) or Borderline Rejection.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Cellular Rejection (BPAR).
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With BK Viremia That Require a Change in Immunosuppression or Anti-viral Treatment as Per Standard of Care at the Site.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With CMV Viremia That Require a Change in Immunosuppression or Anti-viral Treatment as Per Standard of Care at the Site
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With de Novo DSA.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Death or Graft Failure.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Impaired Wound Healing Manifested by Wound Dehiscence, Wound Infection, or Hernia at the Site of the Transplant Incision
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Locally Treated Rejection, Defined as Treatment Administered for Rejection Based on Clinical Signs or Biopsy Findings.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Locally Treated Rejection, Defined as Treatment Administered for Rejection Based on Clinical Signs or Biopsy Findings.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Malignancy.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Mycobacterial or Fungal Infections
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Only Graft Failure.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Primary Non-Function (PNF), Defined as Dialysis-dependency for More Than 3 Months.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]The Difference Between the Mean eGFR (Modified MDRD) in the Experimental vs. Control Groups.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]The Percent of Participants Who Need Dialysis After Week 1.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]The Percent of Participants Whose Day 2 Serum CRR Was Less Than 30%.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]The Percent of Participants Whose Day 5 Serum CRR Was Less Than 70%.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]The Percent of Participants With a Serum Creatinine of More Than 3 mg/dL.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Immediately After Surgery) in Serum Creatinine.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]eGFR Values as Measured by CKD-EPI
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]eGFR Values as Measured by MDRD
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]BANFF Grades of First AMR.
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Change in eGFR Between 3 Months and 24 Months as Measured by CKD-EPI
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Change in eGFR Between 3 Months and 24 Months as Measured by MDRD
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Change in eGFR Between 6 Months and 24 Months as Measured by CKD-EPI
NCT02495077 (44) [back to overview]Change in eGFR Between 6 Months and 24 Months as Measured by MDRD
NCT02535416 (9) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Half-Life (t1/2) of the Analytes of ARC-520
NCT02535416 (9) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Clearance (CL) of the Analytes of ARC-520
NCT02535416 (9) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Last Quantifiable Plasma Concentration (AUClast) of the Analytes of ARC-520
NCT02535416 (9) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Zero to 24 Hours (AUC0-24) of the Analytes of ARC-520
NCT02535416 (9) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUCinf) of the Analytes of ARC-520
NCT02535416 (9) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Apparent Volume of Distribution (V) of the Analytes of ARC-520
NCT02535416 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT02535416 (9) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (Lambda z) of the Analytes of ARC-520
NCT02535416 (9) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of the Analytes of ARC-520
NCT02578186 (1) [back to overview]Mean Latency to Persistent Sleep
NCT02625181 (4) [back to overview]PONV Incidence: Number of Participants With Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
NCT02625181 (4) [back to overview]The Number of Prophylactic Interventions for PONV
NCT02625181 (4) [back to overview]Time to Discharge From the Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU)
NCT02625181 (4) [back to overview]Adherence to PONV Guidelines
NCT02635828 (2) [back to overview]Incidence of Subjects Significant QTc Changes in the EKG
NCT02635828 (2) [back to overview]PONV Incidence
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Stimulant Use
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Opioid Use
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Marijuana Use
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]Brief Pain Inventory
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]Cognitive Impairment Scale
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]SF-36 Quality of Life
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]TSOS Patient Satisfaction: Overall Health Care
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]TSOS Patient Satisfaction: Mental Health Care
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline PTSD Checklist- Civilian (PCL-C) Over the Course of the Year After Injury
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Over the Course of the Year After Injury
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline Patient Health Questionnaire 9 Item Depression Scale Over the Course of the Year After Injury
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline Short Form (SF)-12/36 Physical Function Over the Course of the Year After Injury
NCT02657031 (5) [back to overview]The Number of Patients Experiencing Restlessness
NCT02657031 (5) [back to overview]Nausea
NCT02657031 (5) [back to overview]Headache Following Intervention
NCT02657031 (5) [back to overview]Anxiety
NCT02657031 (5) [back to overview]The Number of Participants Experiencing Vomiting
NCT02765256 (4) [back to overview]Safety and Tolerability of the Treatment Regimen Based on Medication Side Effects and/or Adverse Events (AEs).
NCT02765256 (4) [back to overview]The Change in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)
NCT02765256 (4) [back to overview]Change in Disease Activity by Harvey Bradshaw Index
NCT02765256 (4) [back to overview]Change in Disease Activity by Fecal Calprotectin (FCP)
NCT02935699 (4) [back to overview]Patient Sedation Scores
NCT02935699 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Needed to Return to Treatment Center
NCT02935699 (4) [back to overview]Change of Patient Rated Pruritus Score
NCT02935699 (4) [back to overview]Time to Discharge
NCT02972502 (1) [back to overview]Change in Pain Score According to the Numeric Pain Intensity Scale
NCT02999633 (1) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response
NCT03056352 (3) [back to overview]Post Concussion Symptoms Assessed by Post-concussive Symptom Scale
NCT03056352 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Sustained Headache Relief
NCT03056352 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants Satisfied With Medication; Assessed by Self-evaluation
NCT03220958 (3) [back to overview]0-10 Pain Scale on Which 0 = no Pain and 10= the Worst Pain Imaginable
NCT03220958 (3) [back to overview]Headache Days
NCT03220958 (3) [back to overview]Sustained Headache Relief
NCT03258593 (11) [back to overview]Change in Programmed Death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) Levels Between Responders and Non-Responders
NCT03258593 (11) [back to overview]Changes in the Immune Parameters Obtained From Blood Samples
NCT03258593 (11) [back to overview]Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT)
NCT03258593 (11) [back to overview]Number of Grades 1-5 Adverse Events
NCT03258593 (11) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic Parameters in Urine Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Vicineum
NCT03258593 (11) [back to overview]Response Rate
NCT03258593 (11) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Durvalumab
NCT03258593 (11) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival (DFS)
NCT03258593 (11) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Vicineum
NCT03258593 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0)
NCT03258593 (11) [back to overview]Change in Programmed Death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) Levels Between Participants Who Respond and Have Stable Disease (SD), and Those With Progressive Disease (PD)
NCT03322358 (12) [back to overview]Attention
NCT03322358 (12) [back to overview]Inhibitory Control
NCT03322358 (12) [back to overview]Depression
NCT03322358 (12) [back to overview]Blood Pressure
NCT03322358 (12) [back to overview]Activities of Daily Living
NCT03322358 (12) [back to overview]Memory
NCT03322358 (12) [back to overview]Number of Days of Illness in Past Week
NCT03322358 (12) [back to overview]Physical Fitness
NCT03322358 (12) [back to overview]Self-reported Pain
NCT03322358 (12) [back to overview]Sleep Per 24 Hours
NCT03322358 (12) [back to overview]Subjective Well-being
NCT03322358 (12) [back to overview]Happiness
NCT03435692 (6) [back to overview]Total Perioperative Morphine Equivalents
NCT03435692 (6) [back to overview]Nausea
NCT03435692 (6) [back to overview]Muscle Spasm
NCT03435692 (6) [back to overview]Maximum Pain Score
NCT03435692 (6) [back to overview]Itching
NCT03435692 (6) [back to overview]Hospital Length of Stay
NCT03459612 (14) [back to overview]Simulated Driving Performance in Healthy Participants as Measured by Standard Deviation of Lateral Position (SDLP) Using the Cognitive Research Corporation Driving Simulator-MiniSim (CRCDS-MiniSim)
NCT03459612 (14) [back to overview]Number of Correct Responses in Driving Performance Using CogScreen Symbol Digit Coding (SDC) Test
NCT03459612 (14) [back to overview]Simulated Driving Performance in Healthy Participants as Measured by Standard Deviation of Lateral Position (SDLP) Using the Cognitive Research Corporation Driving Simulator-MiniSim (CRCDS-MiniSim)
NCT03459612 (14) [back to overview]Number of Correct Responses in Driving Performance Using CogScreen Symbol Digit Coding (SDC) Test
NCT03459612 (14) [back to overview]Number of Correct Responses in Driving Performance Using CogScreen Symbol Digit Coding (SDC) Test
NCT03459612 (14) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Observed Drug Concentration (Cmax) of Lasmiditan
NCT03459612 (14) [back to overview]PK: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC) of Lasmiditan to the Last Timepoint (0-tlast)
NCT03459612 (14) [back to overview]Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) Score
NCT03459612 (14) [back to overview]Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) Score
NCT03459612 (14) [back to overview]Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) Score
NCT03459612 (14) [back to overview]Simulated Driving Performance in Healthy Participants as Measured by Standard Deviation of Lateral Position (SDLP) Using the Cognitive Research Corporation Driving Simulator-MiniSim (CRCDS-MiniSim)
NCT03459612 (14) [back to overview]Total Number of Collisions
NCT03459612 (14) [back to overview]Total Number of Collisions
NCT03459612 (14) [back to overview]Total Number of Collisions
NCT03639558 (4) [back to overview]Time Patient Was Placed in Straitjacket/Restraint Post Intervention Treatment
NCT03639558 (4) [back to overview]Time Taken for Patient to Fall Asleep Post Intervention
NCT03639558 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants According to the Time Taken for Aggressive Behaviour to Change to Calm and Tranquil
NCT03639558 (4) [back to overview]Time Noted Where Important Adverse Effects Occurred Post Intervention
NCT03805932 (6) [back to overview]Recommended Safe Dose of Moxetumomab Pasudotox-tdfk
NCT03805932 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0)
NCT03805932 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT)
NCT03805932 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Whose Cancer Shrinks or Disappears After Treatment
NCT03805932 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Are Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Free
NCT03805932 (6) [back to overview]Recommended Safe Dose of Rituximab/Ruxience
NCT04189588 (3) [back to overview]Patient Sedation Scores at 1 Hour and 2 Hours Post-injection of Antihistamine (IV Cetirizine HCl or IV Diphenhydramine) and at Discharge.
NCT04189588 (3) [back to overview]Number of Hypersensitivity Reactions to Treatment With an Anti-CD20 Antibody or Paclitaxel
NCT04189588 (3) [back to overview]"Time From Injection to Readiness for Discharge"
NCT04294459 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Target cPRA
NCT04294459 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Graft Survival at 6 Months Post-Transplant
NCT04294459 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Response
NCT04294459 (23) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameters: Concentration Observed at the End of First Intravenous Infusion (Ceoi) of Isatuximab
NCT04294459 (23) [back to overview]PK Parameters: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 168 Hours Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-168 Hours) After First Infusion of Isatuximab
NCT04294459 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
NCT04294459 (23) [back to overview]PK Parameters: Maximum Concentration Observed (Cmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab
NCT04294459 (23) [back to overview]PK Parameters: Time of Clast (Tlast) After First Infusion of Isatuximab
NCT04294459 (23) [back to overview]PK Parameters: Time Taken to Reach Cmax (Tmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab
NCT04294459 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities
NCT04294459 (23) [back to overview]PK Parameters: Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Isatuximab
NCT04294459 (23) [back to overview]Time to First Transplant Offer
NCT04294459 (23) [back to overview]Time to Transplant
NCT04294459 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolytes Parameters
NCT04294459 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Metabolism Parameters
NCT04294459 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Isatuximab
NCT04294459 (23) [back to overview]PK Parameters: Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Clast) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab
NCT04294459 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Anti-Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)-Antibody Reduction
NCT04294459 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities
NCT04294459 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Liver Function Abnormalities
NCT04294459 (23) [back to overview]Duration for Achieving Target cPRA
NCT04294459 (23) [back to overview]Number of Kidney Transplant Offers
NCT04294459 (23) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT04660799 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants Positive for Anti-rHuPH20 Antibodies
NCT04660799 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants Positive for Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Rituximab
NCT04660799 (14) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Rituximab
NCT04660799 (14) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Rituximab
NCT04660799 (14) [back to overview]Subcutaneous Serum Rituximab Trough Concentration (Ctrough SC) and Intravenous Serum Rituximab Trough Concentration (Ctrough IV)
NCT04660799 (14) [back to overview]Observed SC and IV Rituximab Area Under the Curve (AUCsc and AUCiv)
NCT04660799 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Rituximab Administration-related Reactions (ARRs)
NCT04660799 (14) [back to overview]CRR, as Determined by IRC Using International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) 1999 Guidelines
NCT04660799 (14) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate (CRR) as Determined by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) Using Lugano Response Criteria (LRC) for Malignant Lymphoma
NCT04660799 (14) [back to overview]Trough Serum Concentration (Ctrough) of Rituximab
NCT04660799 (14) [back to overview]Time to Cmax (Tmax) of Rituximab
NCT04660799 (14) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR), Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR), as Determined by Investigator and IRC Using Lugano Response Criteria (LRC) for Malignant Lymphoma
NCT04660799 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT04660799 (14) [back to overview]CRR, as Determined by the Investigator Using Lugano Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Here is the number of participants with adverse events. For the detailed list of adverse events see the adverse event module. (NCT00030992)
Timeframe: 10 years

InterventionParticipants (Number)
BMS-24755099

[back to top]

Response Rate

Response rate is the percentage of participants with a response assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Complete response (CR) is disappearance of all target lesions, Partial response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions,progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions or the appearance of one or more new lesions, stable disease (SD) is neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. (NCT00030992)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Complete responsePartial ResponseProgressive diseaseStable disease
BMS-24755019.412.676.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Here is the number of participants with adverse events. For a detailed list of adverse events, see the adverse event module. (NCT00076752)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Autologous HSCT in SLE8

[back to top]

Relapse-free Complete Clinical Response

Complete clinical response is defined as complete clinical response in the target organ and no clinical signs of active lupus as determined by a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) score of ≤3; prednisone ≤10mg/day at 6 months and ≤5mg/day at 12 months or later. (NCT00076752)
Timeframe: 60 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Autologous HSCT in SLE54

[back to top]

Absolute Lymphocyte Count

The absolute lymphocyte count test was performed to investigate immunological efficacy and mechanisms of response after lymphodepleting auto-hematopoietic stem cell transplant for systemic lupus erythematosus. Range of normal values is 0.45-4.9 K/uL. (NCT00076752)
Timeframe: Day -7, day 0, 1 3, and 6 months, 1 year, 18 months, 2 years and 3 years.

InterventionK/uL (Mean)
Day -7Day 01 month3 months6 months1 year18 months2 years3 years
Autologous HSCT in SLE0.540.00650.420.530.821.751.81.81.75

[back to top]

Absolute Neutrophil Count

The absolute neutrophil count test was performed to investigate immunological efficacy and mechanisms of response after lymphodepleting auto-hematopoietic stem cell transplant for systemic lupus erythematosus. Range of normal values is 1.29-7.5 K/uL. (NCT00076752)
Timeframe: Day -7, day 0, 1 3, and 6 months, 1 year, 18 months, 2 years and 3 years.

InterventionK/uL (Mean)
Day -7Day 01 month3 months6 months1 year18 months2 years3 years
Autologous HSCT in SLE5.660.459.112.722.783.442.724.043.77

[back to top]

Anti-Double Stranded Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Antibody

Anti-Double stranded deoxyribonucleic acid antibody is a well accepted biological clinical laboratory marker especially specific for systemic lupus. Range of normal values is 0-24 IU. (NCT00076752)
Timeframe: Day -7, day 0, 1 3, and 6 months, 1 year, 18 months, 2 years and 3 years.

InterventionIU (Mean)
Day -7Day 01 month3 months6 months1 year18 months2 years3 years
Autologous HSCT in SLE17.38.80000000

[back to top]

Anti-Nuclear Antibody

Anti-Nuclear antibody is a well accepted biological clinical laboratory marker of systemic lupus. Range of normal values is 0-0.9 EU. (NCT00076752)
Timeframe: Day -7, day 0, 1 3, and 6 months, 1 year, 18 months, 2 years and 3 years.

InterventionEU (Mean)
Day -7Day 01 month3 months6 months1 year18 months2 years3 years 9
Autologous HSCT in SLE5.44.73.73.22.72.62.82.52.5

[back to top]

Anti-Smith-Ribonuclear Protein Antibody

Anti-Smith-Ribonuclear protein antibody is a well accepted biological clinical laboratory marker of systemic lupus.Range of normal values is 0-19 EU. (NCT00076752)
Timeframe: Day -7, day 0, 1 3, and 6 months, 1 year, 18 months and 2 years.

InterventionEU (Mean)
Day -7Day 01 month3 months6 months1 year18 months2 years
Autologous HSCT in SLE4951.631.529.828.52016.6725.67

[back to top]

Cluster of Differentiation 19 (CD19) + Cells

The CD19 + Cells test was performed to investigate immunological efficacy and mechanisms of response after lymphodepleting auto-hematopoietic stem cell transplant for systemic lupus erythematosus. Range of normal values is 47-409 u/L. (NCT00076752)
Timeframe: Day 0, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years.

Interventioncells/mL^3 (Mean)
Day 01 month3 months6 months1 year3 years
Autologous HSCT in SLE0.010.236.745.32142.69246.83

[back to top]

Cluster of Differentiation 3 (CD3) + Cells

The CD3+Cells test was performed to investigate immunological efficacy and mechanisms of response after lymphodepleting auto-hematopoietic stem cell transplant for systemic lupus erythematosus. Range of normal values is 650-2108 uL. (NCT00076752)
Timeframe: Day 0, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years.

Interventioncells/mL^3 (Mean)
Day 01 month3 months6 months1 year2 years
Autologous HSCT in SLE2.99239.47435.97699.471493.291678.76

[back to top]

Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4) + Cells

The CD4 + Cells test was performed to investigate immunological efficacy and mechanisms of response after lymphodepleting auto-hematopoietic stem cell transplant for systemic lupus erythematosus. Range of normal values is 358-1259 uL. (NCT00076752)
Timeframe: Day 0, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years.

Interventioncells/mL^3 (Mean)
Day 01 month3 months6 months1 year2 years
Autologous HSCT in SLE2.58103.37112.8316.25702.87958.03

[back to top]

Cluster of Differentiation 8 (CD8) + Cells

The CD8 + Cells test was performed to investigate immunological efficacy and mechanisms of response after lymphodepleting auto-hematopoietic stem cell transplant for systemic lupus erythematosus. Range of normal values is 194-836 u/L. (NCT00076752)
Timeframe: Day 0, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years.

Interventioncells/mL^3 (Mean)
Day 01 month3 months6 months1 year2 years
Autologous HSCT in SLE0.34138.68318.47334.91736.67674.69

[back to top]

Extractable Nuclear Antigen (ENA)

Extractable nuclear antigen is a well accepted biological clinical laboratory marker of systemic lupus. Range of normal values is 0-19. (NCT00076752)
Timeframe: Day -7, day 0, 1 3, and 6 months, 1 year, 18 months, 2 years and 3 years.

InterventionEU (Mean)
Day -7Day 01 month3 months6 months1 year18 months2 years3 years
Autologous HSCT in SLE66.964.861.558.551.357.260.650.626.3

[back to top]

Natural Killer Cells

The natural killer cells test was performed to investigate immunological efficacy and mechanisms of response after lymphodepleting auto-hematopoietic stem cell transplant for systemic lupus erythematosus. Range of normal values is 87-505 uL. (NCT00076752)
Timeframe: Day 0, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years.

Interventioncells/mL^3 (Mean)
Day 01 month3 months6 months1 year3 years
Autologous HSCT in SLE0.03117.06116.57123.18158.9115.18

[back to top]

Platelet Count

The platelet count test was performed to investigate immunological efficacy and mechanisms of response after lymphodepleting auto-hematopoietic stem cell transplant for systemic lupus erythematosus. Range of normal values is 162-380 K/uL. (NCT00076752)
Timeframe: Day -7, day 0, 1 3, and 6 months, 1 year, 18 months, 2 years and 3 years.

InterventionK/uL (Mean)
Day -7Day 01 month3 months6 months1 year18 months2 years3 years
Autologous HSCT in SLE251113166187170226210308272

[back to top]

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI)

The SLEDAI activity index test was performed to investigate immunological efficacy and mechanisms of response after lymphodepleting auto-hematopoietic stem cell transplant for systemic lupus erythematosus. Complete clinical response is defined as complete clinical response in the target organ and no clinical signs of active lupus as determined by a SLEDAI score of ≤3; partial response is at least 50% improvement in general disease activity as measured by SLEDAI. Remission is a SLEDAI score <3 and prednisone <10mg/day. 6+ indicates active disease requiring therapy. A score of 0 indicates a better outcome and a score greater then 6+ indicates a worse outcome. (NCT00076752)
Timeframe: Day -7, day 0, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 18 months, 2 years and 3 years.

Interventionscores on a scale. (Mean)
Day -7Day 01 month3 months6 months1 year18 months2 years3 years
Autologous HSCT in SLE4.254.133.631.600000

[back to top]

White Blood Cells

The white blood cell test was performed to investigate immunological efficacy and mechanisms of response after lymphodepleting auto-hematopoietic stem cell transplant for systemic lupus erythematosus. Range of normal values is 3.4-9.6 K/uL. (NCT00076752)
Timeframe: Day -7, day 0, 1 3, and 6 months, 1 year, 18 months, 2 years and 3 years.

InterventionK/uL (Mean)
Day -7Day 01 month3 months6 months1 year18 months2 years3 years
Autologous HSCT in SLE6.890.4710.323.844.215.815.247.176.34

[back to top]

Number of Severe Acute Rejections Stratified by Sirolimus Withdrawal Status

"Participants who experienced severe acute rejections[1] during study~Severe acute rejection is defined as that which requires treatment with anti-lymphocyte antibody or is histologically evaluated as Type IIA or greater using the Banff 1997 criteria[2]~Reference: Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB et al,The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int,55: 713-723, 1999" (NCT00078559)
Timeframe: Transplantation to severe acute rejection (up to four years post-transplantation)

InterventionRejection Events (Number)
Alemtuzumab (Withdrawn From Sirolimus)0
Alemtuzumab (Not Withdrawn From Sirolimus)0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced Graft Loss Stratified by Sirolimus Withdrawal Status

"Participants who experienced graft loss[1] during study~[1]Graft loss is defined as the institution of chronic dialysis (at least 6 consecutive weeks, excluding participants with delayed graft function), transplant nephrectomy, or retransplantation" (NCT00078559)
Timeframe: Transplantation to Graft Loss (up to four years post-transplantation)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Alemtuzumab (Withdrawn From Sirolimus)0
Alemtuzumab (Not Withdrawn From Sirolimus)0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Requiring Anti-lymphocyte Therapy for an Acute Rejection, Stratified by Sirolimus Withdrawal Status

"Participants who experienced acute rejection[1] during study which required anti-lymphocyte (OKT3, ATG) therapy~1] Acute rejection is defined as a biopsy-prove rejection: a renal biopsy demonstrates acute cellular or humoral rejection of Banff[2] Grade 1B or greater; or presumed rejection in the absence of biopsy-proven rejection, the participant is treated for an unexplained 20% increase in serum creatinine.~[2] Reference: Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB et al,The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int,55: 713-723, 1999" (NCT00078559)
Timeframe: Transplantation to acute rejection (up to four years post-transplantation)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Alemtuzumab (Withdrawn From Sirolimus)0
Alemtuzumab (Not Withdrawn From Sirolimus)0

[back to top]

Number of Alemtuzumab Associated Adverse Events, Stratified by Sirolimus Withdrawal Status

(NCT00078559)
Timeframe: Transplantation to end of study (up to four years post-transplant)

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Alemtuzumab (Withdrawn From Sirolimus)2
Alemtuzumab (Not Withdrawn From Sirolimus)8

[back to top]

Number of Acute Rejections in All Enrolled Participants Following Sirolimus Withdrawal

"Following sirolimus withdrawal, the number of acute rejections[1] in all enrolled participants~1] Acute rejection is defined as a biopsy-proven rejection: a renal biopsy demonstrates acute cellular or humoral rejection of Banff[2] Grade 1B or greater; or presumed rejection in the absence of biopsy-proven rejection, the participant is treated for an unexplained 20% increase in serum creatinine.~[2] Reference: Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB et al,The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int,55: 713-723, 1999" (NCT00078559)
Timeframe: Transplantation to end of study (up to four years post-transplant)

InterventionRejection Events (Number)
Alemtuzumab0

[back to top]

Number of Acute Rejections in All Enrolled Participants

"Number of acute rejections[1] in all enrolled subjects from the time of transplantation to the end of the trial (four years post-transplant)~Acute rejection is defined as a biopsy-proven rejection: a renal biopsy demonstrates acute cellular or humoral rejection of Banff[2] Grade 1B or greater; or presumed rejection in the absence of biopsy-proven rejection, the participant is treated for an unexplained 20% increase in serum creatinine.~Reference: Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB et al,The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int,55: 713-723, 1999" (NCT00078559)
Timeframe: Four years post-transplant

InterventionRejection Events (Number)
Alemtuzumab1

[back to top]

Number of Acute Rejections Between Initiation of Sirolimus Withdrawal and End of Study

"Acute rejections[1] between initiation of sirolimus withdrawal and end of study~1] Acute rejection is defined as a biopsy-proven rejection: a renal biopsy demonstrates acute cellular or humoral rejection of Banff[2] Grade 1B or greater; or presumed rejection in the absence of biopsy-proven rejection, the participant is treated for an unexplained 20% increase in serum creatinine.~[2] Reference: Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB et al,The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int,55: 713-723, 1999" (NCT00078559)
Timeframe: Initiation of sirolimus to end of study (up to four years post-transplant)

InterventionRejection Events (Number)
Alemtuzumab0

[back to top]

Change in Renal Function as Measured by Serum Creatinine, Stratified by Withdrawal Status

Mean change from transplantation to Month 48 in serum creatinine. Normal serum creatinine range is from 0.7 - 1.4 mg/dL. In a transplant population, starting serum creatinine is higher than normal range. A negative change indicates better renal function (NCT00078559)
Timeframe: Transplantation to end of study (up to four years post-transplant)

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Alemtuzumab (Withdrawn From Sirolimus)-4.2
Alemtuzumab (Not Withdrawn From Sirolimus)-5.4

[back to top]

Time From Transplantation to Acute Rejection in Participants for Whom Acute Rejection Occurred During the 1 Year Post-transplant Period

"Time (days) to acute rejection[1] for participants occurring during the year following transplantation~1] Acute rejection is defined as a biopsy-proven rejection: a renal biopsy demonstrates acute cellular or humoral rejection of Banff[2] Grade 1B or greater; or presumed rejection in the absence of biopsy-proven rejection, the participant is treated for an unexplained 20% increase in serum creatinine.~[2] Reference: Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB et al,The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int,55: 713-723, 1999" (NCT00078559)
Timeframe: Transplantation to acute rejection (up to one year post-transplant)

InterventionDays (Number)
Alemtuzumab274

[back to top]

Number of Deaths Stratified by Sirolimus Withdrawal Status

Participants who died during the study, all cause(s) (NCT00078559)
Timeframe: Transplantation to Death (up to four years post-transplant)

Interventiondeaths (Number)
Alemtuzumab (Withdrawn From Sirolimus)0
Alemtuzumab (Not Withdrawn From Sirolimus)0

[back to top]

Time From Transplantation to Acute Rejection in Participants for Whom Sirolimus Withdrawal Was Not Initiated

"Time (days) to acute rejection[1] for participants where sirolimus was not initiated~1] Acute rejection is defined as a biopsy-proven rejection: a renal biopsy demonstrates acute cellular or humoral rejection of Banff[2] Grade 1B or greater; or presumed rejection in the absence of biopsy-proven rejection, the participant is treated for an unexplained 20% increase in serum creatinine.~[2] Reference: Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB et al,The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int,55: 713-723, 1999" (NCT00078559)
Timeframe: Transplantation to acute rejection (up to four years post-transplantation)

InterventionDays (Number)
Alemtuzumab274

[back to top]

Number of Tacrolimus Associated Adverse Events, Stratified by Sirolimus Withdrawal Status

(NCT00078559)
Timeframe: Transplantation to end of study (up to four years post-transplant)

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Alemtuzumab (Withdrawn From Sirolimus)0
Alemtuzumab (Not Withdrawn From Sirolimus)2

[back to top]

Number of Sirolimus Associated Adverse Events, Stratified by Sirolimus Withdrawal Status

(NCT00078559)
Timeframe: Transplantation to end of study (up to four years post-transplant)

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Alemtuzumab (Withdrawn From Sirolimus)2
Alemtuzumab (Not Withdrawn From Sirolimus)7

[back to top]

Number of Side Effects of Conventional Immunosuppression, Stratified by Withdrawal Status

Side effects of conventional immunosuppression include increased body weight and hypertension (NCT00078559)
Timeframe: Transplantation to end of study (up to four years post-transplant)

Interventionside effects (Number)
Alemtuzumab (Withdrawn From Sirolimus)2
Alemtuzumab (Not Withdrawn From Sirolimus)6

[back to top]

Change in SLE Expanded Health Survey Physical Function Score From Baseline

Short Form (36) with additional questions specific to lupus (scale = 0-100; with 100 representing the highest level of functioning possible) to measure the ability of rituximab to improve quality of life. A positive value for this outcome measure indicates that symptoms have improved. (NCT00137969)
Timeframe: From baseline to 52 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Rituximab 1000 mg + Prednisone8.2
Placebo + Prednisone4.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Achieved a Major Clinical Response (MCR), Partial Clinical Response (PCR), or Nonclinical Response (NCR) Defined by British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Scores Over The 52-week Treatment Period

The BILAG Index measures clinical disease activity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). A single alphabetic score (A through E) is used to denote disease severity for each of the 8 domains. The global BILAG score is the sum of a converted numerical score (A=9, B=3, C=1, D=0, E=0) over 8 domains. MCR = participants who achieved BILAG C scores or better at 24 weeks, maintained this response without developing a flare to 52 weeks, and did not experience a severe flare from Day 1 to Week 24; PCR = participants who achieved BILAG C score or better at 24 wks and maintained response without a flare for 16 consecutive weeks, or maximum of one BILAG B score at 24 weeks and maintained response without a flare to 52 wks, or maximum of 2 BILAG B scores at 24 wks without development of BILAG scores of A or B until Week 52 if the baseline BILAG score was 1A+>=2Bs, or>=2 As, or>=4 Bs, or participants who enrolled with scores of severe disease and did not achieve a single BILAG B at Month 6. (NCT00137969)
Timeframe: From baseline to 52 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
MCR (excluding PCR)PCRNonclinical Response (NCR)
Placebo + Prednisone141163
Rituximab 1000 mg + Prednisone2129119

[back to top]

Time-adjusted Area Under The Curve Minus Baseline (AUCMB) of BILAG Score Over The 52-week Treatment Period

The BILAG Index measures clinical disease activity in SLE. A single alphabetic score (A through E) is used to denote disease severity for each of the 8 domains. The global BILAG score is the sum of a converted numerical score (A=9, B=3, C=1, D=0, E=0) over 8 domains. The AUCMB of BILAG Score Over 52 Weeks was calculated as: 1. Calculate the AUC of the BILAG global score versus time (in days) by 52 weeks. 2. Calculate the Time-Adjusted AUC by dividing the AUC by the number of days a patient was on the study. 3. Minus the Time-Adjusted AUC by the baseline BILAG global score (NCT00137969)
Timeframe: From baseline to 52 weeks

InterventionBILAG score unit (Mean)
Rituximab 1000 mg + Prednisone-5.8
Placebo + Prednisone-5.9

[back to top]

Time to First Moderate or Severe Flare

The BILAG Index measures clinical disease activity in SLE. A single alphabetic score (A through E) is used to denote disease severity for each of the 8 domains. The global BILAG score is the sum of a converted numerical score (A=9, B=3, C=1, D=0, E=0) over 8 domains. A severe flare = participants had BILAG A score(s) present in one or more domains or BILAG B scores present in three or more domains at the same visit following a visit of inactive disease state defined above. A moderate flare = participants had only BILAG B scores present in two domains at the same visit following a visit of inactive disease state. (NCT00137969)
Timeframe: 52 weeks

Interventiondays (Median)
Rituximab 1000 mg + Prednisone112.0
Placebo + Prednisone126.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Achieved an MCR in The ITT Population

The BILAG Index measures clinical disease activity in SLE. A single alphabetic score (A through E) is used to denote disease severity for each of the 8 domains. The global BILAG score is the sum of a converted numerical score (A=9, B=3, C=1, D=0, E=0) over 8 domains. MCR = participants who achieved BILAG C scores or better at 24 weeks, maintained this response without developing a flare to 52 weeks, and did not experience a severe flare from Day 1 to Week 24. (NCT00137969)
Timeframe: From Weeks 24 to 52

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rituximab 1000 mg + Prednisone14
Placebo + Prednisone9

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Achieved an MCR (Excluding PCR)

The BILAG Index measures clinical disease activity in SLE. A single alphabetic score (A through E) is used to denote disease severity for each of the 8 domains. The global BILAG score is the sum of a converted numerical score (A=9, B=3, C=1, D=0, E=0) over 8 domains. MCR = participants who achieved BILAG C scores or better at 24 weeks, maintained this response without developing a flare to 52 weeks, and did not experience a severe flare from Day 1 to Week 24. PCR = participants who achieved BILAG C score or better at 24 wks and maintained response without a flare for 16 consecutive weeks, or maximum of one BILAG B score at 24 weeks and maintained response without a flare to 52 wks, or maximum of 2 BILAG B scores at 24 wks without development of BILAG scores of A or B until Week 52 if the baseline BILAG score was 1A+>=2Bs, or>=2 As, or>=4 Bs, or participants who enrolled with scores of severe disease and did not achieve a single BILAG B at Month 6. (NCT00137969)
Timeframe: From baseline to 52 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rituximab 1000 mg + Prednisone21
Placebo + Prednisone14

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Achieved a PCR (Including MCR)

The BILAG Index measures clinical disease activity in SLE. A single alphabetic score (A through E) is used to denote disease severity for each of the 8 domains. The global BILAG score is the sum of a converted numerical score (A=9, B=3, C=1, D=0, E=0) over 8 domains. PCR = participants who achieved BILAG C score or better at 24 wks and maintained response without a flare for 16 consecutive weeks, or maximum of one BILAG B score at 24 weeks and maintained response without a flare to 52 wks, or maximum of 2 BILAG B scores at 24 wks without development of BILAG scores of A or B until Week 52 if the baseline BILAG score was 1A+>=2Bs, or>=2 As, or>=4 Bs, or participants who enrolled with scores of severe disease and did not achieve a single BILAG B at Month 6. MCR = participants who achieved BILAG C or better at 24 weeks, maintained this response without developing a flare to 52 weeks, and did not experience a severe flare from Day 1 to Week 24. (NCT00137969)
Timeframe: From baseline to 52 Weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rituximab 1000 mg + Prednisone50
Placebo + Prednisone25

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Achieved a BILAG C or Better in All Domains

The BILAG Index measures clinical disease activity in SLE. A single alphabetic score (A through E) is used to denote disease severity for each of the 8 domains. The global BILAG score is the sum of a converted numerical score (A=9, B=3, C=1, D=0, E=0) over 8 domains. (NCT00137969)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rituximab 1000 mg + Prednisone42
Placebo + Prednisone24

[back to top]

Mortality

Number of participants who died within 100 days and within 1 year, non-relapse and associated with relapse. (NCT00186628)
Timeframe: Day 100 and 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Mortality within 100 days, all causesNonrelapse mortality within 1 yearRelapse + mortality within 1 year
Prophylactic Rituximab012

[back to top]

Overall Survival

(NCT00186628)
Timeframe: 4 years

InterventionPercentage of participants by disease (Number)
Prophylactic Rituximab (CLL Patients)73
Prophylactic Rituximab (MCL Patients)69

[back to top]

Incidence of Relapse

Subjects who Relapsed following after Allogeneic HSCT (NCT00186628)
Timeframe: 4 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Prophylactic Rituximab18

[back to top]

Chronic Graft-vs-Host Disease (cGvHD)

The cumulative percentage of participants who develop chronic graft-vs-host disease (cGvHD). Chronic cGvHD was defined as at least one instance of a clinically-accepted marker for cGvHD (see Filipovich, et al. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2005;11:945-955) (NCT00186628)
Timeframe: 4 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Prophylactic Rituximab20

[back to top]

Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) - Number of Participants Affected

Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) is the measure used to establish overall Maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of cetuximab + capecitabine + radiotherapy +/- oxaliplatin. MTD is defined as the highest dose level for which participants have a < 30% incidence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). The outcome is expressed as the number of participants experiencing a DLT. (NCT00226941)
Timeframe: 10 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group 1 - Cetuximab + Capecitabine-800 + XRT + Oxaliplatin-1004
Group 2 - Cetuximab + Capecitabine-700 + XRT + Oxaliplatin-852
Group A - Cetuximab + Capecitabine-800 + XRT0
Group B - Cetuximab + Capecitabine-1000 + XRT0

[back to top]

Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) - Number of DLTs by Treatment Group

Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) is the measure used to establish overall Maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of cetuximab + capecitabine + radiotherapy +/- oxaliplatin. MTD is defined as the highest dose level for which participants have a < 30% incidence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). The outcome is expressed as the number of DLTs by treatment group. (NCT00226941)
Timeframe: 10 weeks

InterventionDLTs (Number)
Group 1 - Cetuximab + Capecitabine-800 + XRT + Oxaliplatin-10010
Group 2 - Cetuximab + Capecitabine-700 + XRT + Oxaliplatin-852
Group A - Cetuximab + Capecitabine-800 + XRT0
Group B - Cetuximab + Capecitabine-1000 + XRT0

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall Survival (OS) was assessed as the mean survival from the date of entry on study though 72 months. (NCT00226941)
Timeframe: 72 months

Interventionmonths (Mean)
Group 1 - Cetuximab + Capecitabine-800 + XRT + Oxaliplatin-10059.7
Group 2 - Cetuximab + Capecitabine-700 + XRT + Oxaliplatin-8557.0
Group A - Cetuximab + Capecitabine-800 + XRT54.4
Group B - Cetuximab + Capecitabine-1000 + XRT53.7

[back to top]

Tumor Downstaging at Surgical Resection

Downstaging means a reduction from the stage of disease observed at baseline to the stage of disease after treatment with cetuximab, radiotherapy, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine, as determined at the time of surgical removal of the tumor. Downstaging may be observed as improvements in tumor staging at the primary site of the tumor; in nearby (regional) lymph nodes; or in metastatic disease beyond the regional lymph nodes. This outcome specifically does not include participants that achieved a complete response, nor those that experienced no response or disease progression. (NCT00226941)
Timeframe: 12 to 14 weeks after radiotherapy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group 1 - Cetuximab + Capecitabine-800 + XRT + Oxaliplatin-1004
Group 2 - Cetuximab + Capecitabine-700 + XRT + Oxaliplatin-855
Group A - Cetuximab + Capecitabine-800 + XRT3
Group B - Cetuximab + Capecitabine-1000 + XRT5

[back to top]

Time-to-Progression (TTP)

Time-to-progression was assessed as the time from the date of surgical resection to the appearance of either local disease recurrence or distant metastases by any modality (eg, clinical exam, endoscopy, radiographic imaging). All relapses were to be confirmed by biopsy and pathology review. (NCT00226941)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionyears (Median)
Group 1 - Cetuximab + Capecitabine-800 + XRT + Oxaliplatin-1001.4
Group A - Cetuximab + Capecitabine-800 + XRT3.0
Group B - Cetuximab + Capecitabine-1000 + XRT3.9

[back to top]

Survival at 5 Years

Survival at 5 years was assessed as the number of participants alive 5 years after starting treatment. (NCT00226941)
Timeframe: 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group 1 - Cetuximab + Capecitabine-800 + XRT + Oxaliplatin-1005
Group 2 - Cetuximab + Capecitabine-700 + XRT + Oxaliplatin-854
Group A - Cetuximab + Capecitabine-800 + XRT3
Group B - Cetuximab + Capecitabine-800 + XRT3

[back to top]

Pathologic Response Rate

After treatment with capecitabine, cetuximab, radiotherapy, and oxaliplatin, the pathologic response rate was assessed based on the excised tumor taken at the time of surgical resection. Pathologic response rate was determined as the number and proportion of participants who experienced either downstaging of their disease, or complete response (CR, no detectable disease). A participant will be considered to have downstaging of the tumor as a result of the neoadjuvant therapy when the primary tumor (T) stage by pathology isless than the T stage by clinical (endoscopic) evaluation, or when the regional lymph node (N) tumor stage by pathology is less than the N stage by clinical (endoscopic) evaluation. (NCT00226941)
Timeframe: 12 to 14 weeks after radiotherapy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Group 1 - Cetuximab + Capecitabine-800 + XRT + Oxaliplatin-1004
Group 2 - Cetuximab + Capecitabine-700 + XRT + Oxaliplatin-855
Group A - Cetuximab + Capecitabine-800 + XRT3
Group B - Cetuximab + Capecitabine-1000 + XRT5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Anti-double-stranded DNA at Week 52

(NCT00282347)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

InterventionIU/mL (Mean)
Rituximab0.45
Placebo1.06

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Expanded Health Survey Physical Function Score at Week 52

The systemic lupus erythematosus Expanded Health Survey is based on the Short Form 36 Health survey with additional questions specific to lupus. The physical function component score of the survey can range from 0-100. A higher score indicates better health. A positive change score indicates improvement. (NCT00282347)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Rituximab4.8
Placebo5.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Renal Response at Week 24 and Maintained it to Week 52

A participant had a complete renal response if they met the following 3 criteria: (1) Normalization of serum creatinine as evidenced by a serum creatinine level ≤ the upper limit of the normal range of central laboratory values or a serum creatinine level ≤ 15% greater than Baseline, if Baseline serum creatinine was within the normal range of the central laboratory values; (2) Inactive urinary sediment (as evidenced by < 5 red blood cells/high-power field and absence of red cell casts; (3) Urinary protein to creatinine ratio < 0.5. (NCT00282347)
Timeframe: Week 24 to Week 52

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Rituximab1.4
Placebo6.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Renal Response at Week 52

A participant had a complete renal response if they met the following 3 criteria: (1) Normalization of serum creatinine as evidenced by a serum creatinine level ≤ the upper limit of the normal range of central laboratory values or a serum creatinine level ≤ 15% greater than Baseline, if Baseline serum creatinine was within the normal range of the central laboratory values; (2) Inactive urinary sediment (as evidenced by < 5 red blood cells/high-power field and absence of red cell casts; (3) Urinary protein to creatinine ratio < 0.5. (NCT00282347)
Timeframe: Week 52

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Rituximab26.4
Placebo30.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Baseline Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio of > 3.0 Who Achieved a Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio of < 1.0 at Week 52

(NCT00282347)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Rituximab47.4
Placebo53.7

[back to top]

British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) Index Score Over 52 Weeks

The BILAG Index assesses 86 clinical signs and symptoms and laboratory measures of systemic lupus erythematosus in 8 organ system domains: General, mucocutaneous, neurological, musculoskeletal, cardiorespiratory, vasculitis, renal, and hematologic. Most of the 86 items are rated on the following scale: 0=Not present, 1=Improving, 2=Same, 3=Worse, 4=New. Some items are rated as either Yes or No. A single alphabetic score of A (very active) through E (not or never active) for each of the 8 domains is determined from the rating of the individual items in each domain. The total BILAG score is the sum of the scores of the 8 domains where A=9, B=3, C=1, D=0, and E=0. The total score ranges from 0 to 72 with a higher score indicating greater lupus activity. To calculate a BILAG score over the 52 week treatment period of the study, the area under the response-time curve of BILAG scores assessed every 4 weeks was divided by the number of days in the time curve minus the Baseline BILAG score. (NCT00282347)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Rituximab-8.49
Placebo-8.58

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in C3 and C4 Complement Levels at Week 52

(NCT00282347)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
C3 ComplementC4 Complement
Placebo25.96.6
Rituximab37.59.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Renal Response (CRR), a Partial Renal Response (PRR), or no Renal Response (NRR) at Week 52

A participant had a CRR if they met the following 3 criteria: (1) Normalization of serum creatinine (SC) as evidenced by a SC level ≤ the upper limit of the normal range of central laboratory values or a SC level ≤ 15% greater than Baseline, if Baseline SC was within the normal range of the central laboratory values; (2) Inactive urinary sediment (as evidenced by < 5 red blood cells/high-power field (RBCs/HPF) and absence of red cell casts; (3) Urinary protein (UP) to creatinine ratio (CR) < 0.5. A participant had a PRR if they met the following 3 criteria: (1) A SC level ≤ 15% above Baseline; (2) RBCs/HPF ≤ 50% above Baseline and no RBC casts; (3) 50% improvement in the UP to CR, with 1 of the following conditions met: If the Baseline UP to CR was ≤ 3.0, then a UP to CR of < 1.0 or if the Baseline UP to CR was > 3.0, then a UP to CR of ≤ 3.0. A participant had a NRR if they did not achieve either a CRR or PRR. (NCT00282347)
Timeframe: Week 52

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
CRRPRRNRR
Placebo30.615.354.2
Rituximab26.430.643.1

[back to top]

Time to Achieve a Complete Renal Response

(NCT00282347)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Rituximab11.99
Placebo12.12

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event

A serious adverse event is defined as an adverse event that results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization, results in significant disability, results in birth defect, or is considered a significant medical event by the investigator. (NCT00381810)
Timeframe: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 52 weeks)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Rituximab 1000 mg35.5

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Requiring Rescue Medication for Breakthrough Nausea or Emesis After Completion of the First Course of Emetogenic Chemotherapy

CINV will be determined based on the number of rescue medications used during the 3 days following completion of chemotherapy cycle. Rescue medication is any medication administered by the treating team to control breakthrough nausea or emesis. Rescue medications were used to treat any patient who has enough symptoms requiring additional therapy. All patients were instructed to first use the push button on the pump. On-demand administration of study agent via the patient-controlled infusion pump will not be considered rescue therapy - it is part of the antiemetic treatment regimen. If on-demand administration is not successful in controlling the patient's symptoms, then as-needed rescue medications are to be administered. The treating staff will administer additional (as needed) doses of intravenous antiemetics, depending on the institutional preference. (NCT00429702)
Timeframe: 3 days of following completion of first chemotherapy cycle

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Benadryl® Ativan® Decadron® (BAD) Pump3
Control Arm Saline4

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Requiring Rescue Medication for Breakthrough Nausea or Emesis During Inpatient Chemotherapy

Rescue medication is any medication administered by the treating team to control breakthrough nausea or emesis. Rescue medications were used to treat any patient who has enough symptoms requiring additional therapy. All patients were instructed to first use the push button on the pump. On-demand administration of study agent via the patient-controlled infusion pump will not be considered rescue therapy - it is part of the antiemetic treatment regimen. If on-demand administration is not successful in controlling the patient's symptoms, then as-needed rescue medications are to be administered. The treating staff will administer additional (as needed) doses of intravenous antiemetics, depending on the institutional preference. (NCT00429702)
Timeframe: during in-patient cycle of chemotherapy, up to 4 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Benadryl® Ativan® Decadron® (BAD) Pump1
Control Arm Saline3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Akathisia

The akathisia outcome was reported as follows: Either development of akathisia as measured using the Short Akathisia Instrument (Vinson DR. Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2006; 31:139-145)or use of rescue medication for treatment of akathisia.The short akathisia instrument briefly measures subjective and objective restlessness. (NCT00475306)
Timeframe: 60 minutes

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Metoclopramide 20mg+Diphenhydramine9
Metoclopramide 20+Placebo12
Metoclopramide 10 + Placebo5
Metoclopramide 10+Diphenhydramine8

[back to top]

Nausea Scale

Patients were asked to report their level of nausea on a scale for 0 to 10, with 0 representing no nausea and 10 the worst nausea imaginable (NCT00475306)
Timeframe: 60 minutes

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Metoclopramide 20mg+Diphenhydramine0
Metoclopramide 20+Placebo0
Metoclopramide 10 + Placebo0
Metoclopramide 10+Diphenhydramine0

[back to top]

Median Time to Platelet Engraftment After Autologous Transplant

Reported as platelet engraftment after autologous transplant, defined as platelet count > 20,000/µL, counting from the day of transplant. (NCT00482053)
Timeframe: within 1 month

InterventionDays (Median)
Auto-HCT Followed by Allo-HCT for Poor-risk DLBCL19

[back to top]

Median Time to Neutrophil Engraftment After Autologous Transplant

Reported as neutrophil engraftment after autologous transplant, defined as absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 500/µL, counting from the day of transplant. (NCT00482053)
Timeframe: within 1 month

InterventionDays (Median)
Auto-HCT Followed by Allo-HCT for Poor-risk DLBCL11

[back to top]

Median Time to Neutrophil Engraftment After Allogeneic Transplant

Reported as neutrophil engraftment after allogeneic transplant, defined as absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 500/µL, counting from the day of transplant. (NCT00482053)
Timeframe: within 1 month

InterventionDays (Median)
Auto-HCT Followed by Allo-HCT for Poor-risk DLBCL10.5

[back to top]

Median Time to Platelet Engraftment After Allogeneic Transplant

Reported as platelet engraftment after allogeneic transplant, defined as platelet count > 20,000/µL, counting from the day of transplant. (NCT00482053)
Timeframe: within 1 month

InterventionDays (Median)
Auto-HCT Followed by Allo-HCT for Poor-risk DLBCL10

[back to top]

Incidence of Chronic Graft vs Host Disease (GvHD)

The incidence of chronic graft vs host disease (GvHD) is reported as any events within 3 years. Note that GvHD was assessed per investigator judgement. There was no protocol-specified criteria of GvHD. (NCT00482053)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Auto-HCT Followed by Allo-HCT for Poor-risk DLBCL0

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

To evaluate the overall and transplant related mortality rate, reported as the number of subjects remaining alive 3 years after transplant. (NCT00482053)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Auto-HCT Followed by Allo-HCT for Poor-risk DLBCL2

[back to top]

Event-free Survival (EFS) Per Protocol

Event-free survival (EFS) through 4 years, as assessed in participants with poor-risk recurrent or primary refractory DLBCL treated with TLI and ATG followed by matched allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation as a consolidation to HCT. Event is defined as tumor progression or death. (NCT00482053)
Timeframe: 48 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Auto-HCT Followed by Allo-HCT for Poor-risk DLBCL48

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) Rate

Overall survival reported as the percentage of participants (less lost-to-follow-up) surviving at 6 years. (NCT00490009)
Timeframe: 6 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bexxar37.5

[back to top]

Clinical Response Rate

Clinical response rate for all participants, reported as the sum of the numbers of patients achieving complete response (CR, complete disappearance of all lesions); functional CR (fCR, minimal residual disease but clear of disease by positron emission tomography (PET)-scan); or partial response (PR, ≥ decrease in size of lesions and negative for active disease by PET-scan). Progressive disease (PD, advancing cancer) or stable disease (not CR, fCR, or PD) not included as Clinical Response. (NCT00490009)
Timeframe: 6 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Clinical ResponseComplete Response (CR)Functional CRPRSDPD
Bexxar201161

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

Time of disease progression reported as the number of subjects experiencing disease progression at the time point of progression. (NCT00490009)
Timeframe: 1.5 months; 3 months; 6 months; or Not Progressed

Interventionparticipants (Number)
1.5 months3 months6 monthsNot Progressed
Bexxar1223

[back to top]

Overall Survival at 2 Years and 5 Years

The percentage of participants who are still alive for A designated period of time (2 years and 5 years) after starting treatment. Continual Assessments every 3 months for 1 year, then every 4 months for 2 years, then every 6 months for 2 years, then once a year. (NCT00515073)
Timeframe: Assessment at 2 years and 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
2 Years5 Years
Paclitaxel (Taxol) + Pelvic Radiation9385

[back to top]

Average Pain Score With Coughing the First Morning Following Surgery

Patients were asked on the first morning following surgery how they rated their pain with coughing utilizing the Numeric Rating Scale for pain, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable. The range is 0-10. (NCT00588159)
Timeframe: First morning following surgery

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Gabapentin Preoperatively5.2
Active Placebo5.0

[back to top]

Average Pain Score With Coughing on Second Morning After Surgery

Numeric rating scale pain score with coughing on second morning after surgery, range 0-10. (NCT00588159)
Timeframe: Second morning after surgery

InterventionUnites on a scale (Mean)
Gabapentin Preoperatively5.0
Active Placebo5.1

[back to top]

Opioid Consumption in Second 24 Hour Hour Period (Hours 24-48) Postoperatively

Opioid equivalents (parenteral and/or oral) utilized by patient between hours 24-48 postoperatively (NCT00588159)
Timeframe: 48 hours postoperatively

Interventionmg (Mean)
Gabapentin Preoperatively114.4
Active Placebo121.6

[back to top]

Average Pain Score at Rest

Pain scores every 4 hours for 48 hours postoperatively, utilizing the numeric rating scale with 0 being no pain and 10 the most severe pain you can imagine. (NCT00588159)
Timeframe: 48 hours

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Gabapentin Preoperatively3.1
Active Placebo2.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Pain at Thoracotomy Site 3 Months Postoperatively

Patients were contacted at 3 months post-thoracotomy and asked if they had pain at the thoracotomy site. We observed the number of participants with the presence of pain at thoracotomy site at 3 months postoperatively. (NCT00588159)
Timeframe: 3 months postoperatively

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Gabapentin Preoperatively37
Active Placebo38

[back to top]

Opioid Consumption in First 24 Hours Postoperatively

(NCT00588159)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionmg (Mean)
Gabapentin Preoperatively111.9
Active Placebo118.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overall Vulvar Vestibulitis Symptoms Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at End of Treatment (12 Weeks) [0 = No Symptoms and 100 = As Bad as They Can be]

(NCT00590590)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks

InterventionScore (Mean)
Lidocaine/Diphenhydramine (Combination)-10.4
Lidocaine-5.3
Placebo-16.3

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Tenderness (on a 0- to 3-point Scale) on Palpation at End of Treatment (12 Weeks) [Scale Rates the Severity of Pain; 0 =Absent and 3 = Severe]

(NCT00590590)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks

InterventionScore (Mean)
Lidocaine/Diphenhydramine (Combination)-3.0
Lidocaine-1.7
Placebo-2.4

[back to top]

Mean Marinoff Dyspareunia Scale Score (MDSS) at End of Treatment (12 Weeks)

The MDSS consists of a participant rating of their dyspareunia (painful sexual intercourse) on a 0- to 3-point scale. Each numerical value on the scale coincides with a level of pain experienced during sexual intercourse; 0 = no dyspareunia (no pain with intercourse) and 3 = completely prevents intercourse (NCT00590590)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Lidocaine/Diphenhydramine (Combination)1.8
Lidocaine1.8
Placebo1.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Marinoff Dyspareunia Scale Score at End of Treatment (12 Weeks)

0-3 scale with 0=no dyspareunia and 3= completely prevents intercourse (NCT00590590)
Timeframe: Baseline -12 Weeks

InterventionScore (Mean)
Lidocaine/Diphenhydramine (Combination)-0.6
Lidocaine-0.4
Placebo-0.7

[back to top] [back to top]

Area Under the Curve

Subjects were instructed to walk on the treadmill and to tell the research coordinator to stop testing when they reached the point at which they typically would need to stop and sit down, or until 15 minutes had elapsed. At defined intervals (every 30 seconds) subjects were asked what their pain level was according to the NRS. The area under the curve of present pain intensity multiplied by the amount of time the subject walked. (NCT00638443)
Timeframe: 10 days

Interventionunits on a scale * minutes (Mean)
Pregabalin100.59
Diphenhydramine95.26

[back to top]

Swiss Spinal Stenosis- Physical Function

The SSS is a series of questions asking about symptom severity, physical function, and satisfaction. The physical function section is a series of 5 questions (maximum 4 points per question) and asks to rate function for each question based on comfortably, sometimes with pain, always with pain, no functional ability. The total score (max=20) is divided by five. The maximum score for the physical function section (max=4) indicates no ability to function. (NCT00638443)
Timeframe: 10 days

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pregabalin2.40
Diphenhydramine2.94

[back to top]

Time to First Symptoms of Moderate Pain

Using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (0=no pain, 10=worst pain imaginable)the time to first symptoms (Tfirst) with a NRS score greater than or equal to 4 (moderate pain level), with treadmill ambulation was measured. (NCT00638443)
Timeframe: 10 days

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Pregabalin2.52
Diphenhydramine3.06

[back to top]

Total Distance

Subjects were instructed to walk on the treadmill and to tell the research coordinator to stop testing when they reached the point at which they typically would need to stop and sit down, or until 15 minutes had elapsed. When the subject reached their maximum distance, the treadmill testing was stopped. This was recorded as total distance based on number of minutes and seconds walked. Minutes was converted to meters based on calculation of defined speed of the treadmill. (NCT00638443)
Timeframe: 10 days

Interventionmeters (Mean)
Pregabalin237.49
Diphenhydramine261.55

[back to top]

Recovery Time

After the subject completed the treadmill test they were asked to immediately return to the seated position. At this point a timer was started. When the subjects pain level returned to baseline (level of pain subject felt in a seated position before walking) the time was stopped. This was recorded as recovery time. Maximum recovery time is 15 minutes. (NCT00638443)
Timeframe: 10 days

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Pregabalin2.36
Diphenhydramine3.15

[back to top]

Final Pain as Measured by NRS

Subjects were instructed to walk on the treadmill and to tell the research coordinator to stop testing when they reached the point at which they typically would need to stop and sit down, or until 15 minutes had elapsed. At defined intervals subjects were asked what their pain level was according to the NRS. When the subject reached their maximum distance, they were asked their NRS score. This was recorded as final pain intensity. Using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (0=no pain, 10=worst pain imaginable)the time to first symptoms (Tfirst) with a NRS score greater than or equal to 4 (moderate pain level), with treadmill ambulation was measured. (NCT00638443)
Timeframe: 10 days

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pregabalin1.82
Diphenhydramine1.53

[back to top]

Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

The VAS asked subjects to place a mark indicative of their low back pain during the past day on a 100mm line, with 0mm representing no pain and 100mm representing extreme pain. (NCT00638443)
Timeframe: 10 days

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pregabalin52.31
Diphenhydramine46.31

[back to top]

Modified Brief Pain Inventory (mBPI)- Interference Score

The mBPI is a series of questions that rates the severity and impact of pain on daily function. The questionnaire is made up of 4 pain severity items using the NRS scale, and seven pain interference sub-scales. The final interference score is an average of the seven sub-scales (0 indicating no interference and 10 indicating complete interference). (NCT00638443)
Timeframe: 10 days

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pregabalin3.70
Diphenhydramine3.58

[back to top]

Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Score

The ODI is a set of 10 questions each with five choices (maximum score of 5 points per question) designed to determine how back pain has affected the ability to manage everyday life (pain intensity, personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, social life, traveling, and change positions). A total score range of 0-50; score of 0 indicates no disability and a score of 50 would indicate 100% disability. (NCT00638443)
Timeframe: 10 days

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pregabalin37.77
Diphenhydramine36.49

[back to top]

Patient Global Assessment (PGA)

Subjects were asked to rate their low back pain according to the PGA. PGA is the impact of disease activity. PGA was measured on a 5-point scale, where 1=very good, 2=good, 3=fair, 4=poor, and 5=very poor. (NCT00638443)
Timeframe: 10 days

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pregabalin2.75
Diphenhydramine2.83

[back to top]

Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire

The RMDQ consists of 24 yes/no statements about activity limitations due to back pain. These questions center on movement, ambulation, and self-care activities. Positive (yes) answers each contribute 1 point to cumulative score with total scores ranging from 0 (no disability) to 24 (severely disabled). (NCT00638443)
Timeframe: 10 days

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pregabalin12.98
Diphenhydramine11.48

[back to top]

Swiss Spinal Stenosis (SSS) Score- Symptom Severity

The SSS is a series of questions asking about symptom severity, physical function, and satisfaction. The symptom severity section is a set of 7 questions (maximum score is 5 points per question) and asks to rate pain for each question based on no pain, mild, moderate, severe or very severe pain. The total score (maximum=35) is added up and divided by seven. The maximum score for the symptom severity section (score=5) indicates very severe symptom severity. (NCT00638443)
Timeframe: 10 days

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pregabalin3.09
Diphenhydramine2.94

[back to top]

Likert Scale for Satisfaction

The Likert Scale measured patient satisfaction on a 0-10 score range (0 = Least Satisfied; 10 = Most Satisfied). (NCT00641797)
Timeframe: 0 days

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Arm 1, Conventional Therapy9
Arm 2, Epley Maneuver9

[back to top]

Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score for Nausea. This Was Calculated by Subtracting the Patient's Reported Score on the 30 Minute VAS From the Patient's Reported VAS Score on Their Baseline VAS.

"Participants independently rated their nausea severity on separate scales at the baseline and 30-minute evaluations to prevent the baseline VAS score from influencing the 30-minute mark. The VAS had the words Least Severe on the left and Most Severe on the right. The possible values range from 0 to 100mm with 0 at the Least Severe extreme and 100 at the Most Severe extreme. Investigators instructed the participant to draw a single vertical line through the point on the 100mm scale that corresponded to their nausea severity at the times of measurement (Baseline and 30 minutes)." (NCT00655642)
Timeframe: Baseline and 30 minute assessments

Interventionmillimeter (Median)
Ondansetron-22.0
Metoclopramide-30.0
Promethazine-29.0
Placebo-16.0

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Score

Change in 11 point pain intensity score between baseline and one hour. At both baseline and one hour, all patients were asked to describe their pain on a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 signifying no pain and 10 signifying the worst pain imaginable. Therefore, the CHANGE in pain score could range from -10 through 10. (NCT00682734)
Timeframe: Baseline, 60 minutes

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Metoclopramide 10 mg Intravenous4.7
Metoclopramide 20 mg4.9
Metoclopramide 40 mg5.3

[back to top]

Incidence of Death

(NCT00771875)
Timeframe: 90 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin (RATG)0
RATG/Rituximab0
RATG/Bortezomib0

[back to top]

Incidence of Post Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD)

(NCT00771875)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin (RATG)0
RATG/Rituximab0
RATG/Bortezomib0

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Allografts With C4d Diffuse Positive Pretreatment Biopsy

(NCT00771875)
Timeframe: 90 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin (RATG)3
RATG/Rituximab3
RATG/Bortezomib5

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Allografts With C4d Focal Positive Pretreatment Biopsy

(NCT00771875)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin (RATG)2
RATG/Rituximab2
RATG/Bortezomib4

[back to top]

Mean Serum Creatinine

Renal allograft function as determined by change (∆) in Calculated creatinine clearance by Cockcroft-Gault at 7, 14, 28, 60, and 90 days and 1 year post therapy initiation (NCT00771875)
Timeframe: 7, 14, 28, 60, 90 days and 1 year post therapy initiation

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
7 days14 days28 days60 days90 days1 year
Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin (RATG)3.043.252.92.622.482.19
RATG/Bortezomib2.312.202.182.382.132.87
RATG/Rituximab2.322.352.352.322.122.07

[back to top]

Renal Allograft Survival

(NCT00771875)
Timeframe: 1 year after rejection treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin (RATG)7
RATG/Rituximab7
RATG/Bortezomib10

[back to top]

Number of Patients in Each Group With Any of the Following: Rejection Reversal or Recurrent Rejection

"Rejection Reversal is a return of serum creatinine to within 115% of the baseline value, or histologic reversal occurring within 14 days of initiation of treatment.~Recurrent Rejection is histologic evidence of rejection noted on a biopsy specimen obtained up to 3 months after documented rejection reversal." (NCT00771875)
Timeframe: 1 year

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rejection RecurrenceRejection Reversal
Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin (RATG)02
RATG/Bortezomib01
RATG/Rituximab01

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Omalizumab

Cmax is the maximum (or peak) concentration of omalizumab in serum. (NCT00866788)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 2 hours post-dose on Days 0 and 3 of Week 0, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16 or early termination (up to Week 16)

Interventionmicrograms per milliliter (µg/mL) (Mean)
Omalizumab 75 mg11.4
Omalizumab 300 mg33.1
Omalizumab 600 mg67

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Immunogenicity

Immunogenicity was measured by detection of anti-therapeutic antibodies (anti-omalizumab antibodies) using a fragment enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). (NCT00866788)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo0
Omalizumab 75 mg0
Omalizumab 300 mg0
Omalizumab 600 mg0

[back to top]

Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of Omalizumab

Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) is the time required for the serum concentration of omalizumab to decrease by half in the final stage of its elimination. (NCT00866788)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 2 hours post-dose on Days 0 and 3 of Week 0, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16 or early termination (up to Week 16)

Interventiondays (Mean)
Omalizumab 75 mg18.2
Omalizumab 300 mg17.1
Omalizumab 600 mg22.5

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Adverse Events by Severity

"The severity (i.e. intensity) of each Adverse Event (AE) was graded according to the following scale: Mild: Symptoms causing no or minimal interference with usual social and functional activities. Moderate: Symptoms causing greater than minimal interference with usual social and functional activities. Severe: Symptoms causing inability to perform usual social and functional activities.~Additional AE data is provided in the AE section below. The terms severe and serious are not synonymous. Severity refers to the intensity of an AE. A Serious AE is defined below." (NCT00866788)
Timeframe: "16 weeks overall (data reported separately for up to 4 weeks and Weeks 5 to 16)"

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
4 Weeks - Any Adverse Event (n=21,23,25,21)4 Weeks - Mild (n=21,23,25,21)4 Weeks - Moderate (n=21,23,25,21)4 Weeks - Severe (n=21,23,25,21)Follow-up period-Any adverse event (n=20,18,23,20)Follow-up period-Mild (n=20,18,23,20)Follow-up period-Moderate (n=20,18,23,20)Follow-up period-Severe (n=20,18,23,20)
Omalizumab 300 mg1265112462
Omalizumab 600 mg107215311
Omalizumab 75 mg84319522
Placebo108207421

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Omalizumab

Tmax is the time to maximum concentration of omalizumab. (NCT00866788)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 2 hours post-dose on Days 0 and 3 of Week 0, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16 or early termination (up to Week 16)

Interventiondays (Mean)
Omalizumab 75 mg7.37
Omalizumab 300 mg8.01
Omalizumab 600 mg6.24

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time of Dosing Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC-Inf)

AUCinf is the area under the concentration-time curve from time of dosing extrapolated to infinity. AUCinf was measured in microgram times day per milliliter (µg*day/mL). Only participants having complete profiles and completed the study were included in the analysis. (NCT00866788)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 2 hours post-dose on Days 0 and 3 of Week 0, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16 or early termination (up to Week 16)

Interventionµg*day/mL (Mean)
Omalizumab 75 mg317
Omalizumab 300 mg1260
Omalizumab 600 mg2800

[back to top]

Change in the Weekly Pruritus Score From Baseline to Week 4

The pruritus (itch) score was recorded by participants twice daily (morning and evening) based on the severity of itch over the last 12 hours, using a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The weekly pruritus score was the sum of average daily pruritus scores over the previous 7 days. The range of the weekly score is 0-21. (NCT00866788)
Timeframe: Baseline (based on the 7 days prior to randomization) and 4 weeks (Days 21-27)

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-3.45
Omalizumab 75 mg-4.50
Omalizumab 300 mg-9.22
Omalizumab 600 mg-6.46

[back to top]

Change in the Weekly Score for Number of Hives From Baseline to Week 4

The number of hives was recorded by participants twice daily (morning and evening) using a scale from 0 (no hives) to 3 (more than 12 hives). The weekly score of number of hives was the sum of the average daily scores over the previous 7 days, and ranged from 0 to 21. (NCT00866788)
Timeframe: Baseline (based on the 7 days prior to randomization) and 4 weeks (Days 21-27)

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-3.46
Omalizumab 75 mg-5.28
Omalizumab 300 mg-10.71
Omalizumab 600 mg-8.10

[back to top]

Change in the Weekly Score for Sleep Interference From Baseline to Week 4

The extent to which hives or itch interfered with participants' sleep was recorded once daily in the patient diary using a scale from 0 (no interference) to 3 (substantial interference, waking often). The weekly score of sleep interference was the sum of the daily scores over the previous 7 days, and ranged from 0 to 21. (NCT00866788)
Timeframe: Baseline (based on the 7 days prior to randomization) and 4 weeks (Days 21-27)

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-3.23
Omalizumab 75 mg-3.90
Omalizumab 300 mg-5.81
Omalizumab 600 mg-6.85

[back to top]

Change in the Weekly Score for the Amount of Rescue Medication From Baseline to Week 4

Diphenhydramine 25mg was provided and used on an as-needed basis (maximum 3 times/day) as rescue medication. The weekly score for the amount of rescue medication is the sum of the daily scores for the amount of rescue medication used at each day in the week, and ranged from 0 to 21. (NCT00866788)
Timeframe: Baseline (based on the 7 days prior to randomization) and 4 weeks (Days 21-27)

InterventionPills (Mean)
Placebo-1.38
Omalizumab 75 mg-1.74
Omalizumab 300 mg-2.64
Omalizumab 600 mg-1.69

[back to top]

Change in Urticaria Activity Score 7 (UAS7) From Baseline to Week 4

The UAS is a composite diary-recorded score, which is the sum of the numeric severity intensity ratings (0 = none to 3 = intense) for 1) the number of wheals (hives) and 2) the intensity of the pruritus (itch). The UAS7 is the sum of the daily average UAS (morning and evening values) for 7 days. The maximum UAS7 score is 42. (NCT00866788)
Timeframe: Baseline (based on the 7 days prior to randomization) and 4 weeks (Days 21-27)

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-6.91
Omalizumab 75 mg-9.79
Omalizumab 300 mg-19.93
Omalizumab 600 mg-14.56

[back to top]

Mean Percent of N-cadherin Expression at Baseline and 8 Weeks of Treatment.

Measures of epithelial plasticity on CTCs in response to Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) inhibition with temsirolimus, using genomic and protein immunohistochemical methodology. N-cadherin was measured in CTCs captured using the CellSearch profile kit. The proportion of CTCs expressing N-cadherin was calculated and divided by the total number of CD45-negative, pan cytokeratin (CK) - positive, and 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI+) intact cells to give a fractional expression of N-cadherin. Results are reported as a percentage. (NCT00887640)
Timeframe: Baseline and 8 weeks

InterventionPercent expression (Median)
Expression at baselineExpression at 8 weeks
Temsirolimus 25 mg9192

[back to top]

Safety and Tolerability of Temsirolimus

Total number of grade 3, 4, and 5 adverse events at least possibly related to temsirolimus therapy. Adverse events were collected using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 and were converted to 4.0 for the purposes of reporting to ClinicalTrials.gov. (NCT00887640)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionAdverse Events (Number)
Grade 3 Adverse EventsGrade 4 Adverse EventsGrade 5 Adverse Events
Temsirolimus 25 mg2820

[back to top]

Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

Time in months from the start of study treatment to the date of first progression according to Prostate Cancer Clinical Trial Working Group 2 (PCWG2) criteria, or to death due to any cause. Patients alive who had not progressed as of the last follow-up had PFS censored at the last follow-up date. Median PFS was estimated using a Kaplan-Meier curve. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. Additionally, according to PCWG2 criteria, disease progression in bone is defined as 2 or more new lesions seen on bone scan compared with the baseline scan used for trial entry. Per PCWG2 guidelines, therapy was not discontinued solely due to a rise in PSA alone. (NCT00887640)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Temsirolimus 25 mg1.9

[back to top]

Maximum Rate of Change of Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA).

Percent change in PSA between baseline and the measurement time point where the largest change in PSA occurred. Note that a positive change (greater than 0) indicates an increase in PSA, and a negative change (less than 0) indicates a decrease. (NCT00887640)
Timeframe: Baseline to 7 months

InterventionPercent change (Median)
Temsirolimus 25 mg48

[back to top]

Change in Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) Counts in Men With Metastatic Treatment-refractory Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.

Median percent change in CTC count from baseline to 8 weeks of treatment. Percent change was calculated by determining the percentage increase or decrease in CTC count from baseline. (NCT00887640)
Timeframe: Baseline to 8 weeks

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Temsirolimus 25 mg-20

[back to top]

Event-free Survival (EFS)

To evaluate the graft versus myeloma effect by monitoring rate of event-free survival (EFS) (NCT00899847)
Timeframe: 2 years after the last participant is enrolled

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Autologous-Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant44

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

To evaluate the graft versus myeloma effect by monitoring rate of overall survival (OS) (NCT00899847)
Timeframe: 2 years after the last participant is enrolled

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Autologous-Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant67

[back to top]

Partial Response Rate (PRR)

"Partial response rate (PRR) was assessed as~> 50% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein reduction by 90% or < 200 mg/24 hr~If serum M-protein is not measurable, then > 50% reduction in the involved serum free light chain~If involved serum free light chain is not measurable, then > 50% reduction in the bone marrow plasma cell percentage + > 50% reduction in the size of any soft tissue plasmacytoma." (NCT00899847)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Autologous-Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant4

[back to top]

Median Time to Engraftment After Allo-PBSC Transplant

"Engraftment is assessed as:~Neutrophil engraftment is > 0.5 x 10⁹/L after cytopenia~Platelet engraftment is > 20 x 10⁹/L after cytopenia" (NCT00899847)
Timeframe: 1 month

InterventionDays (Median)
Neutrophil EngraftmentPlatelet Engraftment
Autologous-Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant2410

[back to top]

Median Time to Engraftment After Auto-PBSC Transplant

"Engraftment is assessed as:~Neutrophil engraftment is > 0.5 x 10⁹/L after cytopenia~Platelet engraftment is > 20 x 10⁹/L after cytopenia" (NCT00899847)
Timeframe: 1 month

InterventionDays (Median)
Neutrophil EngraftmentPlatelet Engraftment
Autologous-Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant1115

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate (CRR)

"Complete response rate (CRR) was assessed as all of:~Negative immunoflixation on the serum and urine~Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas~< 5% plasma cells in bone marrow" (NCT00899847)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Autologous-Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant3

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

Overall response rate (ORR) = Complete Response Rate (CRR) + Partial Response Rate (PRR) (NCT00899847)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Autologous-Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant7

[back to top]

Incidence of Graft Versus Host Disease (GvHD)

To evaluate the incidence acute GvHD of this tandem autologous/allogeneic transplant setting (NCT00899847)
Timeframe: 2 years after the last participant is enrolled.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Autologous-Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3

Acute Graft versus Host Disease (GVHD) was graded by the modified Glucksberg scale. 0 = no GVHD normal, 4 = severe GVHD. (NCT00923910)
Timeframe: 28 days following completion of last vaccine and/or DLI (donor lymphocyte infusion) administration

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Recipients0

[back to top]

Wilm's Tumor (WT1) Delayed-type Hypersensitivity (DTH)

WT1 expression of the hematologic malignancy was confirmed by either having greater than 15% of malignant cells react with anti-WT1 by immunohistochemistry or by having a positive quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of WT1 compared with a negative control. DTH skin testing was performed using KLH and with a cocktail of WT1 peptides as 2 separate injections. Enzyme-Linked Immunospot (ELISpot) was performed against each peptide and was considered positive if results were at least 10 spots above background on at least 2 measurements. DTH was considered positive if there was at least .5cm induration 48 to 72 hours after placement. (NCT00923910)
Timeframe: 48 to 72 hours after placement

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PositiveNegativeNA (Not available)
Recipients221

[back to top]

Time to Immune Response

Immune response was monitored by use of interferon gamma Enzyme-Linked Immunospot (ELISpot) and by delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) testing. (NCT00923910)
Timeframe: 4 to 12 weeks

InterventionWeeks (Number)
Patient 1Patient 2Patient 3Patient 4Patient 5
Recipients12NA843

[back to top]

Wilm's Tumor 1 (WT1) Enzyme-Linked Immunospot (ELISpot)

WT1 expression of the hematologic malignancy was confirmed by either having greater than 15% of malignant cells react with anti-WT1 by immunohistochemistry or by having a positive quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of WT1 compared with a negative control. (NCT00923910)
Timeframe: 48 to 72 hours after placement

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PositiveNegative
Recipients32

[back to top]

Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin (KLH) Delayed-type Hypersensitivity (DTH)

KLH is a neoantigen known to induce helper response was used concurrently as a vaccine adjuvant and control antigen. DTH skin testing was performed using KLH and with a cocktail of WT1 peptides as 2 separate injections. Enzyme-Linked Immunospot (ELISpot) was performed against each peptide and was considered positive if results were at least 10 spots above background on at least 2 measurements. DTH was considered positive if there was at least .5cm induration 48 to 72 hours after placement. (NCT00923910)
Timeframe: 48 to 72 hours after placement

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PositiveNegativeNA (Not available)
Recipients311

[back to top]

Toxicity

Here is the number of participants with adverse events. For details of the adverse events, see the adverse event module. (NCT00923910)
Timeframe: 21 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Recipients5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Progressive Disease

Progressive disease is at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions (i.e. tumor response). Response criteria for acute leukemia's is worse marrow classification (i.e., M status) with at least a 50% increase in the percentage of marrow blasts, or no change in marrow classification (i.e., M status), but a 50% or greater increase in absolute peripheral blast count or extent of medullary disease (NCT00923910)
Timeframe: 4 to12 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Recipients5

[back to top]

Pain Tolerance

The participant places their hand in a water bath kept at 4 degrees Celsius (cold pressor test). They then continue to hold the hand in the water bath until they can no longer tolerate the pain (pain tolerance) or until the end of the testing (truncated at 300 seconds for safety purposes). Reported as the mean (time to hand removal in seconds) at the 30 minute time point. (NCT00991809)
Timeframe: 8 sessions over 4-6 weeks

Interventionseconds (Mean)
Alfentanil105.3
Diphenhydramine19.2

[back to top]

Pain Threshold

The amount of time (in seconds) before the participant first verbally reports feeling pain after placing hand in 4 degree Celsius circulating water bath at the 30 minute time point. Truncated at 300 seconds for safety purposes. (NCT00991809)
Timeframe: 8 sessions over 4-6 weeks

Interventionseconds (Mean)
Alfentanil20.7
Diphenhydramine8.6

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline to Cycle 3 in QT/Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Prolongation in Participants

All electrocardiogram (ECG) tests were performed in triplicate prior to ramucirumab treatment. QT is the interval between the Q and T waves and QTc is the QT corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula: QTc = QT/RR^0.33 where RR is the interval between 2 R waves. Each participant's mean QT/QTc value was calculated for each ECG test during Cycle 3 and compared to his/her mean pretreatment QT/QTc value. The greatest change from baseline during Cycle 3 was reported. QTc prolongation is defined as a QTc exceeding 10 milliseconds (msec) with a lower 90% confidence interval (CI) exceeding 5 msec at any postdose time points per the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) E14 guidelines for non-thorough QT studies (ICH 2005; ICH 2008). Least squares (LS) mean was calculated using a linear mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) and adjusted for serum concentration. (NCT01017731)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 3 (1 cycle=21 days)

Interventionmilliseconds (msec) (Least Squares Mean)
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab)3.9132

[back to top]

Area Under Concentration (AUC) During Cycle 1

The area under the concentration versus time curve from time 0 to infinity [AUC(0-inf)] is reported during Cycle 1 (1 cycle=21 days). (NCT01017731)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 [2.25 hours (h), 3.25 h, 4.25 h, 72 h, 168 h, 336 h postdose]

Interventionhours*micrograms/milliliter (h*mcg/mL) (Geometric Mean)
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab)67400

[back to top]

Area Under Concentration (AUC) During Cycle 3

The area under the concentration versus time curve over the dosing interval at steady state [AUC(tau,ss)] is reported during Cycle 3 (1 cycle=21 days). (NCT01017731)
Timeframe: Cycle 3 [predose and 1.25 hours (h), 2.25 h, 3.25 h, 4.25 h, 72 h, 168 h, 336 h, and 504 h postdose]

Interventionhours*micrograms/milliliter (h*mcg/mL) (Geometric Mean)
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab)69900

[back to top]

Maximum Concentration (Cmax) During Cycle 3

The maximum observed serum concentration of IMC-1121B (ramucirumab) at steady state (Cmax,ss) during Cycle 3 (1 cycle=21 days). (NCT01017731)
Timeframe: Cycle 3 [predose and 1.25 hours (h), 2.25 h, 3.25 h, 4.25 h, 72 h, 168 h, 336 h, and 504 h postdose]

Interventionmicrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL) (Geometric Mean)
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab)571

[back to top]

Maximum Concentration (Cmax) During Cycle 1

Maximum observed concentration of IMC-1121B (ramucirumab) in serum during Cycle 1 (1 cycle=21 days). (NCT01017731)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 [2.25 hours (h), 3.25 h, 4.25 h, 72 h, 168 h, 336 h postdose]

Interventionmicrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL) (Geometric Mean)
IMC-1121B (Ramucirumab)485

[back to top]

Change in Severity of Raynaud's Phenomenon

"Severity of Raynaud's phenomenon was measured by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ). The SHAQ VAS includes a question asking, In the past week, how much has your Raynaud's Phenomenon interfered with your activities? Participants were asked to place a mark on a 15 cm line, scaled from 0 (does not interfere) to 100 (very severe limitation), to describe the severity of their Raynaud's phenomenon in the past week. The distance from the left edge of the line to the vertical line placed by the participant was measured in centimeters; VAS scores were converted to a 0 to 100 scale." (NCT01086540)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre Treatment Initiation) to Week 24 and Week 48

,
InterventionScore on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change from Baseline to Week 24Change from Baseline to Week 48
Placebo0.10.1
Rituximab-2.2-4.4

[back to top]

Number of Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Through Week 48

Total number of Grade 3, 4, and 5 AEs. Ref: National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.0. (NCT01086540)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre Treatment Initiation) to Week 48

,
InterventionEvents (Number)
Grade 3 AEsGrade 4 AEsGrade 5 AEs
Placebo1921
Rituximab2863

[back to top]

Number of New Digital Ulcers

The total number of digital ulcers present on the dorsal and palmar surfaces for both the left and right fingers were captured at the Baseline study visit. The number of new digital ulcers since the last study visit (including any ulcers that had appeared and healed since the last study visit) on the dorsal and palmar surfaces for both the left and right fingers were captured at the post-Baseline study visits. The total number of digital ulcers on both hands was summed from the number present on the dorsal and palmar surfaces for both the left and right fingers. (NCT01086540)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre Treatment Initiation) to Week 24 and Week 48

,
InterventionNew Ulcers (Mean)
Total Ulcer Count at BaselineNew Ulcers at Week 24New Ulcers at Week 48
Placebo0.40.10.2
Rituximab0.60.00.1

[back to top]

Oxygen Saturation Levels at Week 24 and Week 48

Oxygen saturation is the amount of oxygen that is in your bloodstream and is measured as the percentage of blood hemoglobin that is carrying oxygen. Normal oxygen saturation levels are considered to be 95-100 percent; low oxygen saturation values indicate worse disease. Room air oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry and/or amount of supplemental oxygen used, if saturation <90%, were recorded. (NCT01086540)
Timeframe: Week 24 , Week 48

,
InterventionPercent Oxygen Saturation (Mean)
O2 Sat Level: Week 24O2 Sat Level: Week 48
Placebo96.196.2
Rituximab96.597.7

[back to top]

Time to Clinical Worsening

"Assessment of time to clinical worsening, censored at Week 48, defined as the first occurrence of any of the following:~death,~hospitalization for Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (SSc-PAH),~lung transplantation,~atrial septostomy,~addition of other Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) therapeutic agents, or~worsening of the six minute walk distance by > 20% and an increase in New York Heart Association functional class.~Time to clinical worsening was defined as the first date that met any of the above criteria and was calculated in study days as: date of first event minus (-) date of treatment randomization. If a participant did not experience any of the referenced events by Week 48 or, if the date of death was after the 48 week follow-up period, time to clinical worsening was equal to the participant's duration of follow-up in the study." (NCT01086540)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre Treatment Initiation) to Week 48

InterventionWeeks (Mean)
Rituximab21.2
Placebo26.2

[back to top]

Time to the Change or Addition of New Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) Therapeutic Medications

Per protocol, from the time of study entry, participants were to remain on background PAH medical therapy with either a single agent or a combination of prostanoid, endothelin receptor antagonist, PDE-5 inhibitor, and/or guanylate cyclase stimulators as per the entry criteria. Doses should have remained stable through the Week 24 primary outcome/endpoint visit. If a dose of a background PAH medication was changed or a new PAH medication was added during the course of the trial, the date of the first dose change or additional medication was recorded. Time to the addition or modification of PAH medications was defined in study days as: date of the first time a PAH medication was modified or added minus (-) date of randomization. (NCT01086540)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre Treatment Initiation) to Week 48

InterventionWeeks (Mean)
Rituximab21.2
Placebo26.7

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Distance Walked During a Six Minute Walk Test at Week 24 and Week 48

The six minute walk test measures the distance a participant is able to walk over a total of six minutes on a hard, flat surface. The goal is for the participant to walk as far as possible in six minutes. The participant is allowed to self-pace and rest as needed as they traverse back and forth along a marked walkway. The total distance walked, in meters, was recorded for each participant. Longer distances indicate better outcomes. (NCT01086540)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre Treatment Initiation) to Week 24 and Week 48

,
InterventionMeters (Least Squares Mean)
Change from Baseline to Week 24Change from Baseline to Week 48
Placebo0.4-7.0
Rituximab25.59.5

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Measured by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): Mental Component Summary Score

The SF-36 measures health-related quality of life. It has 36 items and 2 component scores, the Physical Component Score and the Mental Component Score. The SF-36 Mental Health component summary score is comprised of the Vitality Scale, the Social Functioning Scale, the Role-Emotional Scale, and the Mental Health Scale. It is scaled from 0 to 100 with a score of 0 equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability. A negative value indicates a decrease in quality of life from Baseline. (NCT01086540)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre Treatment Initiation) to Week 24 and Week 48

,
InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change from Baseline to Week 24Change from Baseline to Week 48
Placebo0.40.9
Rituximab0.10.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Measured by the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): Physical Component Summary Score

The SF-36 measures health-related quality of life. It has 36 items and 2 component scores, the Physical Component Score and the Mental Component Score. The SF-36 Physical component summary score is comprised of the Physical Functioning Scale, the Role-Physical Scale, the Bodily Pain Scale, and the General Health Scale. It is scaled from 0 to 100 with a score of 0 equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability. A negative value indicates a decrease in quality of life from Baseline. (NCT01086540)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre Treatment Initiation) to Week 48

,
InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change from Baseline to Week 24Change from Baseline to Week 48
Placebo1.73.5
Rituximab0.61.3

[back to top]

Change in Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity (DLCO)

"Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity (DLCO) is a measure of lung function. Predicted values for DLCO were computed according to the Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) all-age reference values and corrected for hemoglobin. Lower DLCO values indicate worse disease activity.~DLCO (Diffusing Capacity of the Lungs for Carbon Monoxide)" (NCT01086540)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre Treatment Initiation) to Week 24 and Week 48

,
InterventionPercent Predicted Value (Least Squares Mean)
Change from Baseline to Week 24Change from Baseline to Week 48
Placebo0.40.7
Rituximab-0.3-0.5

[back to top]

Change in Quality of Life as Measured by the Disability Index of the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI)

The HAQ-DI is a self-reported questionnaire of functionality that includes questions in 8 domains (dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities) and addresses scleroderma related manifestations that contribute to disability. The final score ranges from 0 to 3, where a higher HAQ-DI score indicates a worse outcome. (NCT01086540)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre Treatment Initiation) to Week 24 and Week 48

,
InterventionUnits on a Scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change from Baseline to Week 24Change from Baseline to Week 48
Placebo0.00.0
Rituximab0.00.0

[back to top]

All-Cause Mortality: From Treatment Initiation to Week 104

Death from any cause occurring after randomization and ≤ Week 104. (NCT01086540)
Timeframe: Day 0 (Treatment Randomization) to Week 104

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Rituximab8
Placebo5

[back to top]

All-Cause Mortality: From Treatment Initiation to Week 48

Death from any cause occurring after randomization and ≤ Week 48. (NCT01086540)
Timeframe: Day 0 (Treatment Randomization) to Week 48

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Rituximab4
Placebo1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Distance Walked During a Six Minute Walk Test

The six minute walk test measures the distance a participant is able to walk over a total of six minutes on a hard, flat surface. The goal is for the participant to walk as far as possible in six minutes. The participant is allowed to self-pace and rest as needed as they traverse back and forth along a marked walkway. The total distance walked, in meters, was recorded for each participant. Longer distances indicate better outcomes. (NCT01086540)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre Treatment Initiation) to Week 24

InterventionMeters (Least Squares Mean)
Rituximab23.6
Placebo0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance Measured by Right Heart Catheterization at Week 24

During a right heart catheterization, a catheter is guided to the right side of the heart and then into the pulmonary artery; blood flow through the heart is observed and is used to measure pressures in a participant's heart and lungs. The calculation of Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR) is measured in Woods Units. Change is derived by measuring the difference between Baseline and Week 24 PVR (Week 24 minus Baseline). Higher PVR values indicate worse disease status. (NCT01086540)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre Treatment Initiation) to Week 24

InterventionWoods Units (Least Squares Mean)
Rituximab-0.5
Placebo0.1

[back to top] [back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance Measured by Right Heart Catheterization

"During a right heart catheterization, a catheter is guided to the right side of the heart and then into the pulmonary artery; blood flow through the heart is observed and is used to measure pressures in a participant's heart and lungs. Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) is measured in Woods Units. Higher PVR values indicate worse disease status.~Change in PVR is determined by Baseline value minus (-) Week 24 value." (NCT01086540)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre Treatment Initiation) to Week 24

InterventionPercent Change (Least Squares Mean)
Rituximab-4.6
Placebo3.2

[back to top]

Overall Rating of Pain Relief

"Subjects responded to question, Overall, the relief from my starting pain was by checking one of the following choices: no relief (0), a little relief (1), some relief (2), a lot of relief (3), complete relief (4)." (NCT01118273)
Timeframe: Up to 10 hours

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
No reliefA little reliefSome reliefA lot reliefComplete relief
DPH 50mg119520
Ibuprofen 400 mg / Diphenhydramine Citrate 76 mg425133
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689)634113
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg235134
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689)347103
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg148122

[back to top]

Number of Times Participants Took Rescue Medication

"Subjects were allowed to rescue and take a non-study pain reliever if the pain was not tolerable. This measure represents for the number of times rescue medication was taken by a subject." (NCT01118273)
Timeframe: Up to 10 hours

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
0123
DPH 50mg22230
Ibuprofen 400 mg / Diphenhydramine Citrate 76 mg161100
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689)141300
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg19800
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689)151200
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg151200

[back to top]

Karolinska Sleep Diary - Well Rested

Subject rating of following question with 1 being not rested at all to 3 being completely rested: Well-rested? (NCT01118273)
Timeframe: Up to 10 hours

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
1 = Not rested at all2 = Somewhat unrested3 = Completely rested
DPH 50mg3141
Ibuprofen 400 mg / Diphenhydramine Citrate 76 mg1174
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689)0128
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg0149
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689)4144
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg1138

[back to top]

Karolinska Sleep Diary - Sufficient Sleep

Subject rating of following question with 1 being no, definitely too little to 5 being yes, definitely enough: Did you get enough (sufficient) sleep? (NCT01118273)
Timeframe: Up to 10 hours

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
1 = No, definitely too little2 = No, much too little3 = No, somewhat too little4 = Yes, almost enough5 = Yes, definitely enough
DPH 50mg24840
Ibuprofen 400 mg / Diphenhydramine Citrate 76 mg116122
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689)114104
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg023144
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689)43483
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg144103

[back to top]

Karolinska Sleep Diary - Sleep Quality

Subject rating of following question with 1 being very poor and 5 being very good: How was your sleep? (NCT01118273)
Timeframe: Up to 10 hours

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
1 = Very poor2 = Rather poor3 = Neither poor nor good4 = Rather good5 = Very good
DPH 50mg15390
Ibuprofen 400 mg / Diphenhydramine Citrate 76 mg011092
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689)12791
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg123143
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689)401152
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg126112

[back to top]

Karolinska Sleep Diary - Premature Awakening

Subject rating of following question with 1 being woke up much too early to 3 being no: Premature awakening? (NCT01118273)
Timeframe: Up to 10 hours

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
1 = Woke up much too early2 = Woke up somewhat too early3 = No
DPH 50mg864
Ibuprofen 400 mg / Diphenhydramine Citrate 76 mg5134
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689)677
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg2129
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689)6106
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg589

[back to top]

Karolinska Sleep Diary - Easiness to Fall Asleep

Subject rating of following question with 1 being very difficult to 5 being very easy: How easy was it to fall asleep? (NCT01118273)
Timeframe: Up to 10 hours

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
1 = Very difficult2 = Rather difficult3 = Neither difficult nor easy4 = Rather easy5 = Very easy
DPH 50mg16740
Ibuprofen 400 mg / Diphenhydramine Citrate 76 mg05791
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689)35372
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg121181
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689)531121
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg031081

[back to top]

Karolinska Sleep Diary - Ease of Awakening

Subject rating of following question with 1 being very difficult to 5 being very easy: Ease of awakening? (NCT01118273)
Timeframe: Up to 10 hours

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
1 = Very difficult2 = Rather difficult3 = Neither difficult nor easy4 = Rather easy5 = Very easy
DPH 50mg01395
Ibuprofen 400 mg / Diphenhydramine Citrate 76 mg004144
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689)111152
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg02588
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689)10786
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg011155

[back to top]

Karolinska Sleep Diary - Calmness of Sleep

Subject rating of following question with 1 being very restless and 5 being very calm: How calm was your sleep? (NCT01118273)
Timeframe: Up to 10 hours

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
1 = Very restless2 = Rather restless3 = Neither restless nor calm4 = Rather calm5 = Very calm
DPH 50mg17361
Ibuprofen 400 mg / Diphenhydramine Citrate 76 mg07582
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689)15761
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg163121
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689)27463
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg015160

[back to top]

Global Assessment of Study Medication as a Sleep-aid

Subject rating of following question with 0 being poor to 4 being excellent: How would you rate the study medication you received as a sleep aid? (NCT01118273)
Timeframe: Up to 10 hours

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
PoorFairGoodVery goodExcellent
DPH 50mg67320
Ibuprofen 400 mg / Diphenhydramine Citrate 76 mg06970
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689)46631
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg23783
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689)64741
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg14854

[back to top]

Global Assessment of Study Medication as a Pain Reliever

Subject responded to question, 'How would you rating this study medication you received as a pain-reliever?' with the following choices: Poor (0), Fair(1), Good(2), Very Good(3), Excellent(4) (NCT01118273)
Timeframe: Up to 10 hours

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
PoorFairGoodVery goodExcellent
DPH 50mg157500
Ibuprofen 400 mg / Diphenhydramine Citrate 76 mg554112
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689)64791
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg25497
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689)47745
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg167112

[back to top]

Cumulative Proportion of Participants Taking Rescue Medication by Hour

"Subjects were allowed to rescue and take a non-study pain reliever if the pain was not tolerable. This measure represents for the proportion of subjects who rescued in the study." (NCT01118273)
Timeframe: Up to 10 hours

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
1 hour2 hours3 hours4 hours5 hours6 hours7 hours8 hours9 hours10 hours
DPH 50mg4172021242525252525
Ibuprofen 400 mg / Diphenhydramine Citrate 76 mg07777910101111
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689)19910111213131313
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg0555567788
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689)391111111112121212
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg26810111111111112

[back to top]

Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO) Measured by Actigraphy

Actigraphy is a non-intrusive tool that measures an individual's movement during sleep. Actigraphy was used to obtain data in discriminating between sleep and wake states in the subjects. WASO was defined as minutes of awake during the period of sleep onset and offset, where sleep onset is the first 20-minute block with 19 minutes of sleep. (NCT01118273)
Timeframe: Up to 10 hours

InterventionMinutes (Least Squares Mean)
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg139.96
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689)190.91
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg75.66
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689)145.67
DPH 50mg428.34
Ibuprofen 400 mg / Diphenhydramine Citrate 76 mg129.02

[back to top]

Wake Episode Measured by Actigraphy

Actigraphy is a non-intrusive tool that measures an individual's movement during sleep. Actigraphy was used to obtain data in discriminating between sleep and wake states in the subjects. Wake Episodes - # of blocks of continuous wake epochs (defined as 2 or more consecutive epochs scored as wake that ends when there is at least one epoch scored as sleep subsequent to the start of the wake epochs). (NCT01118273)
Timeframe: Up to 10 hours

InterventionWake episodes (Least Squares Mean)
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg8.38
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689)10.86
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg13.26
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689)9.89
DPH 50mg5.84
Ibuprofen 400 mg / Diphenhydramine Citrate 76 mg11.98

[back to top]

Total Wake Time Measured by Actigraphy

Actigraphy is a non-intrusive tool that measures an individual's movement during sleep. Actigraphy was used to obtain data in discriminating between sleep and wake states in the subjects. (NCT01118273)
Timeframe: Up to 10 hours

InterventionMinutes (Least Squares Mean)
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg253.72
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689)290.03
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg180.21
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689)285.62
DPH 50mg518.58
Ibuprofen 400 mg / Diphenhydramine Citrate 76 mg255.20

[back to top]

Total Sleep Time Measured by Actigraphy

"Actigraphy is a non-intrusive tool that measures an individual's movement during sleep. Actigraphy was used to obtain data in discriminating between sleep and wake states in the subjects. In calculating the total sleep time, subjects who took rescue medication were treated as awake from the time the rescue medication was given until the end of the sleep period. In addition, if subjects rescued before sleep onset, their total sleep time was set to zero." (NCT01118273)
Timeframe: Up to 10 hours

InterventionMinutes (Least Squares Mean)
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg339.80
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689)304.60
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg413.89
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689)308.89
DPH 50mg76.35
Ibuprofen 400 mg / Diphenhydramine Citrate 76 mg335.68

[back to top]

Total Sleep Time by Subject Assessment

Subject responded to: Please estimate the number of hours and minutes you think that you slept. (NCT01118273)
Timeframe: Up to 10 hours

InterventionMinutes (Least Squares Mean)
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg306.32
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689)309.97
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg339.08
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689)309.23
DPH 50mg160.49
Ibuprofen 400 mg / Diphenhydramine Citrate 76 mg299.58

[back to top]

Time to Rescue Medication

"Subjects were allowed to rescue and take a non-study pain reliever if the pain was not tolerable. This measure represents for the time to taking rescue medication from the time the subject took study treatment." (NCT01118273)
Timeframe: Up to 10 hours

InterventionMinutes (Median)
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mgNA
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689)NA
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mgNA
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689)NA
DPH 50mgNA
Ibuprofen 400 mg / Diphenhydramine Citrate 76 mgNA

[back to top]

Sleep Quality Index

Sleep Quality Index is the mean score of items, 'sleep quality', 'calm sleep', 'ease falling asleep', and 'slept throughout' on the Karolinska Sleep Diary, ranges from 1 (worst possible) to 5 (best possible). (NCT01118273)
Timeframe: Up to 10 hours

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg3.49
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689)2.89
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg3.40
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689)3.12
DPH 50mg2.96
Ibuprofen 400 mg / Diphenhydramine Citrate 76 mg3.37

[back to top]

Sleep Latency Measured by Actigraphy

Actigraphy is a non-intrusive tool that measures an individual's movement during sleep. Actigraphy was used to obtain data in discriminating between sleep and wake states in the subjects. Sleep latency was defined as minutes to sleep onset since dosing, where sleep onset was the first 20-minute block with 19 minutes of sleep. For subjects who had not achieved sleep onset (e.g., due to taking rescue medication before achieving sleep onset), sleep latency was considered as censored at the time of wakening. (NCT01118273)
Timeframe: Up to 10 hours

InterventionMinutes (Least Squares Mean)
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg29.17
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689)32.81
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg46.77
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689)31.58
DPH 50mg41.05
Ibuprofen 400 mg / Diphenhydramine Citrate 76 mg36.38

[back to top]

Sleep Efficiency Measured by Actigraphy

Sleep efficiency was calculated as (total sleep time/total time in-bed time) × 100; total in-bed time was fixed at 10 hours. Actigraphy is a non-intrusive tool that measures an individual's movement during sleep. Actigraphy was used to obtain data in discriminating between sleep and wake states in the subjects. (NCT01118273)
Timeframe: Up to 10 hours

InterventionPercentage of sleep time (Least Squares Mean)
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg57.24
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689)51.49
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg68.87
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689)52.09
DPH 50mg12.85
Ibuprofen 400 mg / Diphenhydramine Citrate 76 mg56.70

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score

Subjects completed the VAS scale at baseline (post-dental surgery) and after completion of the sleep period. Subjects marked a line on a 100-mm scale to indicate the severity of pain they are experiencing from 0 being no pain to 100 being worse possible pain.This measure indicates the change in pain severity rating on the VAS scale from baseline. (NCT01118273)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 10 hours

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg-44.04
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689)-36.65
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg-47.26
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689)-25.89
DPH 50mg6.00
Ibuprofen 400 mg / Diphenhydramine Citrate 76 mg-35.89

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Categorical Pain Rating Scale Score

Subjects responded to question, 'My pain at this time is' with following choices: no pain (0), mild pain (1), moderate pain (2), or severe pain (3). Subjects completed this question at baseline (post-dental surgery) and after sleep period. The following measure is the change in pain rating from baseline. (NCT01118273)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to 10 hours

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg-1.2
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689)-1.0
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg-1.2
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689)-0.7
DPH 50mg0.3
Ibuprofen 400 mg / Diphenhydramine Citrate 76 mg-0.9

[back to top]

Activity Mean Measured by Actigraphy

Actigraphy is a non-intrusive tool that measures an individual's movement during sleep. Actigraphy was used to obtain data in discriminating between sleep and wake states in the subjects. Activity mean - average movement per minute. (NCT01118273)
Timeframe: Up to 10 hours

InterventionMovement per minute (Least Squares Mean)
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg42.09
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689)48.48
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg26.73
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689)52.36
DPH 50mg72.43
Ibuprofen 400 mg / Diphenhydramine Citrate 76 mg41.14

[back to top]

Overall Rating of Severity in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score

Subjects marked a line on a 100-mm scale to indicate the severity of pain they are experiencing from 0 being no pain to 100 being worse possible pain. (NCT01118273)
Timeframe: At 10 hours

,,,,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
BaselinePost-Baseline
DPH 50mg79.1584.26
Ibuprofen 400 mg / Diphenhydramine Citrate 76 mg73.1138.19
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689)73.7048.59
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg78.1930.33
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689)77.2640.30
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg76.1132.11

[back to top]

Overall Rating of Severity in Categorical Pain Rating Scale Score

Subject responded to question, 'My pain at this time is' by selecting one of the following choices: no pain (0), mild pain (1), moderate pain (2), or severe pain (3). (NCT01118273)
Timeframe: Up to 10 hours

,,,,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
BaselinePost-Baseline
DPH 50mg2.372.67
Ibuprofen 400 mg / Diphenhydramine Citrate 76 mg2.221.41
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689)2.481.78
Naproxen Sodium 220 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg2.481.26
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689)2.481.48
Naproxen Sodium 440 mg (BAYH6689) / DPH 50mg2.441.26

[back to top]

Interpolated Average Pain (0-8 Hours)

Interpolated average pain (0 to 8 hours): area under the curve (AUC) of average pain (0 to 120 seconds) recorded at each of the time points taken over 8 hour time period divided by 8. (NCT01119222)
Timeframe: Pre-dose to 8 hours post-dose

Interventionhours (Least Squares Mean)
Gabpentin42.2
Morphine33.4
Diphenhydramine43.6
Placebo42.8

[back to top]

Average Pain (0-120 Seconds): Cold Pain Test Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

"Area under the cold pain test Visual Analog Scale (VAS) time curve (AUCcpt 0 to 120 seconds [sec]) averaged over the 120 sec for each time point assessed. Participant adjusted 100 millimeter (mm) electronic VAS with range of no pain (0) to maximum pain (100) at the anchor endpoints of the scale and moderate pain at the midpoint. Pain reported while non-dominant hand was placed in thermostatically controlled water bath at 2±1°C for a maximum of 120 sec." (NCT01119222)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-dose

,,,
Interventionmm (Mean)
Pre-dose1 hour1.5 hours2 hours4 hours8 hours
Diphenhydramine45.045.142.340.544.243.8
Gabapentin45.241.939.440.441.944.7
Morphine45.528.626.125.634.736.7
Placebo44.938.440.239.544.344.2

[back to top]

Total Fentanyl

Total fentanyl dose delivered during the procedure (NCT01158820)
Timeframe: During the bronchoscopy procedure only, 58.5 minutes average

Interventionµg (Median)
Placebo112.5
Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine68.75

[back to top]

Total Midazolam

Total midazolam delivered during procedure (NCT01158820)
Timeframe: Duration of procedure

Interventionmg (Median)
Placebo4.5
Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine2.75

[back to top]

Conversion to General Anesthesia

Patients in which the procedure could not be completed without conversion to general anesthesia (NCT01158820)
Timeframe: During the bronchoscopy procedure only, 58.5 minutes average

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo6
Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine1

[back to top]

Decreased Minute Ventilation

An initial baseline minute ventilation estimate was obtained via calibrated respiratory impedance plethysmography bands. Subsequent minute ventilation was normalized to this value. Values exceeding 100% were excluded from analysis, as these typically reflected a period of hyperpnea subsequent to relief of airway obstruction by chin lift or jaw thrust. (NCT01158820)
Timeframe: During the bronchoscopy procedure only, 58.5 minutes average

Interventionpercentage of baseline (Median)
Placebo0.736
Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine0.764

[back to top]

Desaturation (Cumulative)

Cumulative time below saturation of 90% - the total number of seconds that the pulse oximeter reported a saturation below 90% (NCT01158820)
Timeframe: During the bronchoscopy procedure only, 58.5 minutes average

Interventionseconds (Median)
Placebo39
Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine40

[back to top]

Desaturation (Longest)

Longest time below saturation of 90% (the number of seconds elapsed between the start of a period in which the pulse oximeter saturation fell below 90% and the return above 90%) (NCT01158820)
Timeframe: During the bronchoscopy procedure only, 58.5 minutes average

Interventionseconds (Median)
Placebo21
Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine18

[back to top]

Endoscopist Satisfaction

Satisfaction rated by 10 point Likert scale (0 = Totally dissatisfied, 10 = Totally satisfied) (NCT01158820)
Timeframe: After the bronchoscopy procedure only

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Placebo7
Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine8

[back to top]

Patient Satisfaction

Satisfaction rated by 10 point Likert scale (0 = Totally dissatisfied, 10 = Totally satisfied) (NCT01158820)
Timeframe: After the bronchoscopy procedure only

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Placebo9
Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine10

[back to top]

Side Effects

(NCT01204255)
Timeframe: 3 months

InterventionTotal number of side effects (Number)
Application of Lorazepam, Diphenhydramine, Haloperidol0

[back to top]

Lorazepam, Diphenyhydramine, Haloperidol Absorption

Level of lorazepam absorption measured by the serum concentration of the drug (NCT01204255)
Timeframe: 4 hours

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
lorazepam absorptiondiphenhydramine absorptionhaloperidol absorption
Application of Lorazepam, Diphenhydramine, Haloperidol0.080

[back to top]

Percentage of Angioedema-free Days From Week 4 to Week 12

"The percentage of angioedema-free days from Weeks 4 to 12 was defined as the number of days for which a patient responded No to the angioedema question in the daily diary divided by the total number of days with a non-missing diary entry, starting at the Week 4 visit and ending the day prior to the Week 12 visit." (NCT01264939)
Timeframe: Week 4 to Week 12

InterventionPercentage of days (Mean)
Placebo88.1
Omalizumab 300 mg91.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Complete Responders (UAS7 = 0) at Week 12

A complete responder was defined as a participant with a UAS7 score = 0 at Week 12. The UAS7 is the sum of the daily urticarial activity scores over 7 days and ranges from 0 to 42. The daily urticarial activity score is the average of the morning and evening urticarial activity scores and ranges from 0 to 6. The urticarial activity score is the sum of ratings on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=none to 3=intense/severe) for (1) the number of wheals (hives) and (2) itch intensity over the previous 12 hours, ranges from 0 to 6, and is measured twice daily (morning and evening). The Baseline score is the sum of the daily urticarial activity scores over the 7 days prior to the first treatment. A higher urticarial activity score indicates more urticaria activity. (NCT01264939)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo4.8
Omalizumab 300 mg33.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a UAS7 Score ≤ 6 at Week 12

The UAS7 is the sum of the daily urticarial activity scores over 7 days and ranges from 0 to 42. The daily urticarial activity score is the average of the morning and evening urticarial activity scores and ranges from 0 to 6. The urticarial activity score is the sum of ratings on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=none to 3=intense/severe) for (1) the number of wheals (hives) and (2) itch intensity over the previous 12 hours, ranges from 0 to 6, and is measured twice daily (morning and evening). The Baseline score is the sum of the daily urticarial activity scores over the 7 days prior to the first treatment. A higher urticarial activity score indicates more urticaria activity. (NCT01264939)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo12.0
Omalizumab 300 mg52.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events

The percentage of participants with serious adverse events and other adverse events is summarized by MedDRA preferred terms and organ classes in the Reported Adverse Events section below. (NCT01264939)
Timeframe: Baseline to the end of study (up to 40 weeks)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo78.3
Omalizumab 300 mg83.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Weekly Itch Severity Score MID Responders at Week 12

The percentage of participants with an itch severity score at 12 Weeks at least 5 points lower than at Baseline. The weekly itch severity score is the sum of the daily itch severity scores over 7 days and ranges from 0 to 21. The daily itch severity score is the average of the morning and evening scores on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The Baseline weekly itch severity score is the sum of the daily itch severity scores over the 7 days prior to the first treatment. A higher itch severity score indicates more severe itching. (NCT01264939)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo39.8
Omalizumab 300 mg69.8

[back to top]

Time to Minimally Important Difference (MID) Response in the Weekly Itch Severity Score by Week 12

The time to the MID response is the number of weeks from the start of treatment (Baseline) until the time point at which the first MID response occurs. The MID response is defined as a reduction ≥ 5 points from Baseline in the weekly itch severity score. The weekly itch severity score is the sum of the daily itch severity scores over 7 days and ranges from 0 to 21. The daily itch severity score is the average of the morning and evening scores on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The Baseline weekly itch severity score is the sum of the daily itch severity scores over the 7 days prior to the first treatment. A higher itch severity score indicates more severe itching. (NCT01264939)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Placebo5.0
Omalizumab 300 mg2.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Overall Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 12

The DLQI is a 10-item dermatology-specific health-related quality of life measure. Patients rated their dermatology symptoms as well as the impact of their skin condition on various aspects of their lives on a scale of 0 (Not at all) to 3 (Very much). The overall DLQI is the sum of the responses to the 10 items and ranges from 0 to 30. A lower score indicates a better quality of life. A negative change score indicates improvement. (NCT01264939)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-5.11
Omalizumab 300 mg-9.69

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Urticaria Activity Score Over 7 Days (UAS7)

The UAS7 is the sum of the daily urticarial activity scores over 7 days and ranges from 0 to 42. The daily urticarial activity score is the average of the morning and evening urticarial activity scores and ranges from 0 to 6. The urticarial activity score is the sum of ratings on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=none to 3=intense/severe) for (1) the number of wheals (hives) and (2) itch intensity over the previous 12 hours, ranges from 0 to 6, and is measured twice daily (morning and evening). The Baseline score is the sum of the daily urticarial activity scores over the 7 days prior to the first treatment. A higher urticarial activity score indicates more urticaria activity. A negative change score indicates improvement. (NCT01264939)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-8.50
Omalizumab 300 mg-19.01

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Weekly Itch Severity Score

The weekly itch severity score is the sum of the daily itch severity scores over 7 days and ranges from 0 to 21. The daily itch severity score is the average of the morning and evening scores on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The Baseline weekly itch severity score is the sum of the daily itch severity scores over the 7 days prior to the first treatment. A higher itch severity score indicates more severe itching. A negative change score indicates improvement. (NCT01264939)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-4.01
Omalizumab 300 mg-8.55

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Weekly Number of Hives Score

The weekly hives score is the sum of the daily hives scores over 7 days and ranges from 0 to 21. The number of hives is measured twice daily (morning and evening) on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (> 12 hives per 12 hours). The daily hives score is the average of the morning and evening scores. The Baseline score is the sum of the daily hives scores over the 7 days prior to the first treatment. A higher score indicates more hives. A negative change score indicates improvement. (NCT01264939)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-4.49
Omalizumab 300 mg-10.46

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Weekly Size of the Largest Hive Score

The weekly size of the largest hive score is the sum of the daily size of the largest hive scores over 7 days and ranges from 0 to 21. The daily size of the largest hive score is assessed twice daily (morning and evening) on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (> 2.5 cm). The daily size of the largest hive score is the average of the morning and evening scores. The Baseline weekly size of the largest hive score is calculated over the 7 days prior to the first treatment. A higher score indicates larger hives. A negative change score indicates a reduction in hive size. (NCT01264939)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-3.09
Omalizumab 300 mg-8.82

[back to top]

Effect of Ibuprofen, Diphenhydramine and Aluminium MgS Measured on Decrease in Pain Level and Burning Sensation

pain sensation was measured by VAS (Visual Analogue Scale, a scaled ruler which the zero point displays the zone of lack of pain and the 10th point was considered as the zone of maximum pain)) 4 days after the consumption of the solution (NCT01293968)
Timeframe: four days after the start of the study

Interventionscores in Visual Analogue Scale (Mean)
Ibuprofen, Diphenhydramine and Aluminium MgS3.176
Diphenhydramine and Aluminium MgS3.821

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) on the Brief Assessment of Cognition (BAC) Scaled Token Motor Task Test Score

Participants were given 100 plastic tokens and asked to place them in a container, 2 at a time, as quickly as possible for 60 seconds. The number of tokens correctly placed in the container was the Token Motor Task score (range: 0-100). The BAC was conducted prior to each simulated driving test. The Token Motor Task scaled test score was calculated as indicated for the Verbal Memory Test. Change from baseline was calculated as the Day composite score minus the Baseline composite score. The scaled test score range is -6.95 to 3.35, with higher scaled scores indicating better cognition. (NCT01332318)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -1and 1) and Days 14, 15, and 16

,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Day 14, n=33, 28, 33, 28Day 15, n=33, 28, 33, 28Day 16, n=32, 28, 33, 28
GEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo0.4-0.00.4
GEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo0.2-0.20.1
GEn Placebo and DPH 50 mg on Day 160.30.20.4
GEn Placebo and DPH Placebo0.20.40.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in Overall Average Speed

Participants were instructed to maintain a speed of 55 miles per hour during the driving assessment. Change from baseline in overall average speed was calculated as the Day 14 (in the evening), 15 (in the morning), or 16 (at Tmax of GEn and DPH) mean speed over the 1-hour drive minus the Baseline (Days -1 and 1) mean speed over the 1-hour drive. (NCT01332318)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -1 and 1) and Days 14, 15, and 16

,,,
Interventionmiles per hour (Mean)
Day 14, n=33, 28, 33, 28Day 15, n=32, 28, 31, 27Day 16, n=30, 28, 33, 28
GEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo0.660.330.90
GEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo0.420.300.92
GEn Placebo and DPH 50 mg on Day 160.120.370.84
GEn Placebo and DPH Placebo1.240.751.70

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in Overall Average Lane Position

Lane position was measured from the center line of the 26 foot wide 2-lane paved road to the center of the vehicle. Change from baseline in overall average lane position was calculated as the Day 14 (in the evening), 15 (in the morning after GEn dosed at 5 PM), or 16 (assessment at Tmax of GEn and DPH) mean lane position over the 1-hour drive minus the Baseline (Days -1 and 1) mean lane position over the 1-hour drive. (NCT01332318)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -1 and 1) and Days 14, 15, and 16

,,,
Interventionfeet (Mean)
Day 14, n=33, 28, 33, 28Day 15, n=32, 28, 31, 27Day 16, n=30, 28, 33, 28
GEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo-0.020.120.13
GEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo0.030.040.14
GEn Placebo and DPH 50 mg on Day 160.080.040.08
GEn Placebo and DPH Placebo0.050.010.17

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in Brake Reaction Time

Brake reaction time was assessed as the time it took for each participant to move their foot off the accelerator and onto the brake pedal after the appearance of a stop sign on the simulation screen. Change from baseline was calculated as the Day 14, 15, or 16 mean reaction time minus the Baseline (Days -1 and 1) mean reaction time. (NCT01332318)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -1 and 1) and Days 14, 15, and 16

,,,
Interventionseconds (Mean)
Day 14, n=33, 25, 32, 27Day 15, n=32, 25, 30, 25Day 16, n=30, 28, 33, 27
GEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo-0.07-0.03-0.05
GEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo-0.03-0.01-0.03
GEn Placebo and DPH 50 mg on Day 16-0.04-0.05-0.03
GEn Placebo and DPH Placebo-0.04-0.00-0.04

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Post Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ) Responses at Day 14

The PSQ is designed to evaluate sleep quality, ability to function, and the degree to which RLS symptoms interfere with sleep. (NCT01332318)
Timeframe: Day 14

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Sleep Quality: ExcellentSleep Quality: ReasonableSleep Quality: PoorAbility to Function: ExcellentAbility to Function: GoodAbility to Function: ModerateAbility to Function: Poor0 Nights with RLS Symptoms1-2 Nights with RLS Symptoms3-4 Nights with RLS Symptoms5-6 Nights with RLS Symptoms7 Nights with RLS Symptoms0 Awakenings/Night due to RLS1-2 Wakenings/Night due to RLS3-4 Awakenings/Night due to RLS5+ Awakenings/Night due to RLS0 Hours Awake/Night due to RLS<1 Hour Awake/Night due to RLS1-<2 Hours Awake/Night due to RLS2-<3 Hours Awake/Night due to RLS3+ Hours Awake/Night due to RLS
GEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo5185617508761671821234010
GEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo1417211184010983382311310020
GEn Placebo and DPH93121832201812171311104182533320

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Number of Simulated Crashes on Days 14 (Evening), 15 (Morning After Dose), and 16 (Tmax)

A simulated crash was defined as a collision with an oncoming car or obstacle (e.g., tree) or when the distance to the center line was greater than 18 feet on either side of the road. (NCT01332318)
Timeframe: Days 14, 15, and 16

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Day 14; 1 Crash, n=33, 28, 33, 28Day 14; 2 Crashes, n=33, 28, 33, 28Day 14; 3 Crashes, n=33, 28, 33, 28Day 14; 4 Crashes, n=33, 28, 33, 28Day 14; 5 Crashes, n=33, 28, 33, 28Day 14; 13 Crashes, n=33, 28, 33, 28Day 15; 1 Crash, n=33, 28, 31, 28Day 15; 2 Crashes, n=33, 28, 31, 28Day 15; 4 Crashes, n=33, 28, 31, 28Day 15; 13 Crashes, n=33, 28, 31, 28Day 16; 1 Crash, n=30, 28, 33, 28Day 16; 3 Crashes, n=30, 28, 33, 28Day 16; 4 Crashes, n=30, 28, 33, 28Day 16; 5 Crashes, n=30, 28, 33, 28Day 16; 13 Crashes, n=30, 28, 33, 28Day 16; 17 Crashes, n=30, 28, 33, 28
GEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo1201114321511001
GEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo0010001000320010
GEn Placebo and DPH 50 mg on Day 161000000000200100
GEn Placebo and DPH Placebo2200001000000000

[back to top]

Number of Participants in Each Category of the Participant-Rated Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at Day 14

"The participant-rated CGI-I scale is a self-rated assessment designed to allow participants to rate the change of their disease severity over time based on a seven-point scale, with a score of 1 being very much improved and a score of 7 being very much worse." (NCT01332318)
Timeframe: Day 14

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very Much Improved, score of 1Much Improved, score of 2Minimally Improved, score of 3No Change, score of 4Minimally Worse, score of 5Much Worse, score of 6Very Much Worse, score of 7
GEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo91133200
GEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo14964000
GEn Placebo and DPH7161417520

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With no Reported RLS Symptoms During the 24-hour RLS Record at Day 14

The 24-Hour RLS Record is a diary in which participants report the presence and severity of RLS symptoms (none, mild, moderate, or severe) for a 24-hour period, in 30-min increments beginning at 8AM on the day prior to the visit. (NCT01332318)
Timeframe: Day 14

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
GEn Placebo and DPH9.84
GEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo35.71
GEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo42.42

[back to top]

Number of Participants With no Reported RLS Symptoms During Each of the 4-hour Periods From the 24-hour RLS Record at Day 14

The 24-Hour RLS Record is a diary in which participants report the presence and severity of RLS symptoms (none, mild, moderate, or severe) for a 24-hour period, in 30-minute increments. The period was divided into 7 four-hour intervals (8 AM to 12 PM, 12 PM to 4 PM, 4 PM to 8 PM, 6 PM to 10 PM, 8 PM to 12 Midnight, Midnight to 4 AM, and 4 AM to 8 AM). (NCT01332318)
Timeframe: Day 14

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
8 AM to 12 PM12 PM to 4 PM4 PM to 8 PM6 PM to 10 PM8 PM to 12 AM12 AM to 4 AM4 AM to 8 AM
GEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo21201918131723
GEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo27232623182426
GEn Placebo and DPH37353627182439

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Day -1) in Overall Lane Position Variability (LPV) on Day 16 (Tmax)

Lane position variability (LPV) was defined as the standard deviation of lane position, and was measured from the center line of the 26 foot wide 2-lane paved road to the center of the vehicle. Change from baseline in overall LPV was calculated as the Day 16 mean LPV over the 1-hour drive minus the Baseline mean LPV over the 1-hour drive. The Day 16 measurement is at the time of maximum concentration (Tmax) for both GEn and DPH. (NCT01332318)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1) and Day 16

Interventionfeet (Least Squares Mean)
GEn Placebo and DPH Placebo-0.10
GEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo0.15
GEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo0.15
GEn Placebo and DPH 50 mg on Day 160.16

[back to top]

Number of Participants in Each Category of the Investigator-Rated Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at Day 14

"The CGI scale is a widely used tool designed to allow clinicians to rate the severity of illness and the change of the disease severity over time based on a seven-point rating scale, with a score of 1 being very much improved and a score of 7 being very much worse compared to baseline." (NCT01332318)
Timeframe: Day 14

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very Much Improved, score of 1Much Improved, score of 2Minimally Improved, score of 3No Change, score of 4Minimally Worse, score of 5Much Worse, score of 6Very Much Worse, score of 7
GEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo10774000
GEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo15864000
GEn Placebo and DPH7151915410

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) on the Pittsburgh Sleep Diary (PghSD) Sleep Onset Items

The PghSD assessed participant's previous night's sleep. Change from baseline was calculated as the Day 14 (in the evening), 15 (in the morning), and 16 (at Tmax of GEn and DPH) value minus the Baseline (Days -1 and 1) value. Latency to sleep onset (time to fall asleep) and wake time after sleep onset are expressed in minutes. (NCT01332318)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -1and 1) and Days 14, 15, and 16

,,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
Day 14; Latency to Sleep Onset, n=61, 28, 33Day 14; Wake Time After Sleep Onset, n=59, 26, 33Day 15; Latency to Sleep Onset n=61, 28, 33Day 15; Wake Time After Sleep Onset, n=60, 28, 33Day 16; Latency to Sleep Onset, n=60, 28, 23Day 16; Wake Time After Sleep Onset, n=59, 26, 33
GEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo-3.2-23.3-14.9-30.8-3.3-26.3
GEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo-25.7-26.9-35.8-14.8-19.3-9.9
GEn Placebo and DPH-8.1-14.0-8.74.9-17.3-15.8

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in the Pittsburgh Sleep Diary (PghSD) Sleep Quality

"The PghSD assessed a participant's previous night's sleep. Sleep quality was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Participants indicated their sleep quality by marking a vertical line on a horizontal scale anchored by responses very bad and very good. VAS score was determined by measuring the distance in millimeters (mm) from the left hand end of the line to the point that the participant marked. Scores ranged from 0 to 100 mm with higher scores indicating better sleep quality and lower scores indicating worse sleep quality." (NCT01332318)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1and 1) and Days 14, 15, and 16

,,
Interventionmillimeters (Mean)
Day 14, n=61, 28, 33Day 15, n=61, 28, 33Day 16, n=59, 28, 33
GEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo29.924.627.4
GEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo35.118.016.7
GEn Placebo and DPH21.211.820.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Score

"The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is a questionnaire designed to evaluate daytime sleepiness. Participants were asked to rate how likely they were to doze or fall asleep during 8 activities on a scale of 0 (would never do) to 3 (high chance of dozing). The total score ranges from 0-24, with a score greater than 10 representing excessive daytime sleepiness (an increased chance of dozing). Change from baseline was calculated as the Day 14 total score minus the Baseline total score." (NCT01332318)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1) and Day 14

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
GEn Placebo and DPH Placebo-2.6
GEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo-2.3
GEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo-2.4
GEn Placebo and DPH 50 mg on Day 16-2.4

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline (Day -1) at Day 14 in the International Restless Legs Syndrome (IRLS) Rating Scale Total Score

The IRLS Rating scale is a measure of RLS disease severity and reflects the participant-reported assessment of primary sensory and motor features and associated sleep problems in RLS. Items are included that assess the impact of symptoms on participants' mood, daily life, and activities. The total score ranges from 0-40 points, with 40 being the most severe. The scale assesses symptoms over the week prior to measurement. (NCT01332318)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1) and Day 14

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
GEn Placebo and DPH-7.6
GEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo-12.4
GEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo-13.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in Overall Lane Position Variability (LPV)

Lane position variability (LPV) was defined as the standard deviation of lane position, and was measured from the center line of the 26 foot wide 2-lane paved road to the center of the vehicle. Change from baseline in overall LPV was calculated as the Day 14 (in the evening) or Day 15 (in the morning after GEn dosed at 5 PM) mean LPV over the 1-hour drive minus the Baseline (Day -1 or Day 1) mean LPV over the 1-hour drive. (NCT01332318)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -1 and 1) and Days 14 and 15

,,,
Interventionfeet (Mean)
Day 14, n=33, 28, 33, 28Day 15, n=32, 28, 31, 27
GEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo0.170.13
GEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo-0.010.02
GEn Placebo and DPH 50 mg on Day 16-0.08-0.10
GEn Placebo and DPH Placebo-0.06-0.01

[back to top]

Median Time to Onset of a Participant's First RLS Symptoms Using the 24-hour RLS Symptom Record at Day 14

The 24-Hour RLS Record is a diary in which participants report the presence and severity of RLS symptoms (none, mild, moderate, or severe) for a 24-hour period, in 30-min increments beginning at 8AM on the day prior to the visit. For Arms 2 and 3, upper limits of the confidence intervals are not available, as they are beyond the 24-hour time frame. (NCT01332318)
Timeframe: Day 14

Interventionparticipants (Median)
GEn Placebo and DPH7.0
GEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo14.3
GEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo15.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Responded to Treatment Based on Scores on the Investigator-Rated CGI-I at Day 14

"The investigator-rated CGI-I is a clinician-rated assessment designed to allow clinicians to rate the change of their participant's disease severity over time based on a seven-point scale, with a score of 1 being very much improved, and a score of 7 being very much worse compared to baseline. For this endpoint, response was defined as a rating of very much improved or much improved (score of 1 or 2 on the scale) compared to baseline." (NCT01332318)
Timeframe: Day 14

Interventionparticipants (Number)
GEn Placebo and DPH22
GEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo17
GEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo23

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) on the Brief Assessment of Cognition (BAC) Scaled Tower of London (TOL) Score

Participants (par.) were asked to look at 2 pictures simultaneously; each picture showed 3 different colored balls arranged on 3 pegs. Par. were to estimate the number of times the balls in 1 picture would have to be moved to make the arrangement of balls identical to that of the second picture. Par. were allowed 20 seconds to respond to each pair of pictures. The number of correct items was the TOL Score (range: 0-22). The TOL scaled test score was calculated as indicated for the Verbal Memory Test. The scaled test score range is -7.53 to 2.76; higher scaled scores indicate better cognition. (NCT01332318)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -1and 1) and Days 14, 15, and 16

,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Day 14, n=33, 28, 33, 28Day 15, n=33, 28, 33, 28Day 16, n=32, 28, 33, 28
GEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo0.20.30.5
GEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo0.30.40.5
GEn Placebo and DPH 50 mg on Day 160.50.50.6
GEn Placebo and DPH Placebo0.30.20.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) on the Brief Assessment of Cognition (BAC) Scaled Symbol Coding Test Score

Participants were given a list of numbers (numerals 1-9) that were each associated with a unique symbol. Participants decoded a list of 110 symbols as quickly as possible in 90 seconds. The total number of symbols correctly decoded was the Symbol Coding Score (range: 0-110). The Symbol Coding scaled test score was calculated as indicated for the Verbal Memory Test. Change from baseline was calculated as the Day composite score minus the Baseline composite score. The scaled test score range is -7 to 10.08, with higher scaled scores indicating better cognition. (NCT01332318)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -1and 1) and Days 14, 15, and 16

,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Day 14, n=33, 28, 33, 28Day 15, n=33, 28, 33, 28Day 16, n=32, 28, 33, 28
GEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo0.60.51.4
GEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo0.5-0.01.0
GEn Placebo and DPH 50 mg on Day 160.60.41.3
GEn Placebo and DPH Placebo0.60.51.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) on the Brief Assessment of Cognition (BAC) Scaled Verbal Memory Test Score

Participants were presented with 15 words and asked to recall as many as possible; the procedure was repeated 5 times. The total number of words recalled correctly across the 5 administrations of the list was the participant's Verbal Memory Recall score (range: 0-75). The scaled test score was calculated as ((BAC component raw test score - healthy control sample test mean)/healthy control sample test standard deviation); a healthy control sample was matched to the participant's sex and age category. The scaled test score range is -7.37 to 4.86; higher scaled scores indicate better cognition. (NCT01332318)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -1and 1) and Days 14, 15, and 16

,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Day 14, n=33, 28, 33, 28Day 15, n=33, 28, 33, 28Day 16, n=32, 28, 33, 28
GEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo0.10.1-0.1
GEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo0.2-0.00.1
GEn Placebo and DPH 50 mg on Day 160.10.10.0
GEn Placebo and DPH Placebo0.10.2-0.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) on the Brief Assessment of Cognition (BAC) Scaled Verbal Fluency Test Score

Verbal Fluency included one semantic fluency and two letter fluency tasks. Participants were given 60 seconds to name as many words as possible within a given semantic category (supermarket items), and in two separate trials, participants were given 60 seconds to generate as many words as possible that began with a given letter. The total number of words from all of the 3 trials was the Verbal Fluency score (range: 0-150). The scaled test score was calculated as indicated for the Verbal Memory Test. The scaled test score range is -5 to 10.83; higher scaled scores indicate better cognition. (NCT01332318)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -1 and 1) and Days 14, 15, and 16

,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Day 14, n=33, 28, 33, 28Day 15, n=33, 28, 33, 28Day 16, n=32, 28, 33, 28
GEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo0.50.10.7
GEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo0.40.20.4
GEn Placebo and DPH 50 mg on Day 160.60.40.9
GEn Placebo and DPH Placebo0.20.40.7

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Responded to Treatment Based on Scores on the Participant-Rated CGI-I at Day 14

"The participant-rated CGI-I is a self-rated assessment designed to allow participants to rate the change of their disease severity over time based on a seven-point scale, with a score of 1 being very much improved, and a score of 7 being very much worse. Response was defined as a rating of very much improved or much improved (score of 1 or 2 on the scale)." (NCT01332318)
Timeframe: Day 14

Interventionparticipants (Number)
GEn Placebo and DPH23
GEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo20
GEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo23

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) on the Brief Assessment of Cognition (BAC) Scaled Digit Sequencing Score (DSS)

Participants (par.) were presented with sets of numbers of increasing length and asked to tell the experimenter the numbers in order from lowest to highest. The task has 7 levels; the first level had 2 digits in the set (e.g., 5, 2); the second level had 3 digits in the set, etc. The number of times the par. correctly arranged the numbers was recorded as the score for each level. The DSS is the sum of the 7 level scores (range: 0-28). The scaled test score was calculated as indicated for the Verbal Memory Test and ranges from -6.68 to 2.73; higher scaled scores indicate better cognition. (NCT01332318)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -1and 1) and Days 14, 15, and 16

,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Day 14, n=33, 28, 33, 28Day 15, n=33, 28, 33, 28Day 16, n=32, 28, 33, 28
GEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo0.20.30.4
GEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo0.4-0.20.5
GEn Placebo and DPH 50 mg on Day 160.30.10.7
GEn Placebo and DPH Placebo0.30.20.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) on the Brief Assessment of Cognition (BAC) Composite Score

The BAC was designed as a comprehensive measure of cognitive function, including 6 individual tests: Verbal Memory Recall, Digit Sequencing, Token Motor Task, Verbal Fluency, Symbol Coding, and Tower of London. The composite/total BAC score is calculated by scoring each individual test, comparing each score to a healthy control sample (matched for sex and age category) to create z-scores, summing the z-scores, and rescaling the sum. The composite score range is -2127.8 to 1878.8, with higher scores indicating better cognition. (NCT01332318)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -1 and 1) and Days 14, 15, and 16

,,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Day 14, n=33, 28, 33, 28Day 15, n=33, 28, 33, 28Day 16, n=32, 28, 33, 28
GEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo5.33.49.1
GEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo5.30.27.1
GEn Placebo and DPH 50 mg on Day 167.04.810.7
GEn Placebo and DPH Placebo4.64.87.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in the Pittsburgh Sleep Diary (PghSD) Total Sleep Time Item

The PghSD assessed a participant's previous night's sleep. Change from baseline was calculated as the Day 14 (in the evening), 15 (in the morning after dose), and 16 (at Tmax)value minus the Baseline (Days -1 and 1) value. Total sleep time is expressed in hours. (NCT01332318)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -1 and 1) and Days 14, 15, and 16

,,
Interventionhours (Mean)
Day 14, n=59, 26, 33Day 15, n=60, 28, 33Day 16, n=59, 26, 33
GEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo0.20.20.3
GEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo1.00.30.4
GEn Placebo and DPH0.3-0.20.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in the Alertness Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score

"Alertness VAS was completed immediately before and after each simulated driving assessment. Participants indicated their alertness by marking a vertical line on a horizontal scale anchored by responses extremely sleepy and extremely alert. VAS score was determined by measuring the distance in millimeters (mm) from the left hand end of the line to the point the participant marked. Scores ranged from 0-100 mm, with higher scores indicating more alertness and lower scores indicating more sleepiness. Change score was calculated as the Day 14, 15, or 16 VAS score minus the Baseline VAS score." (NCT01332318)
Timeframe: Baseline (Days -1 and 1) and Days 14, 15, and 16

,,,
Interventionmillimeters (Mean)
Day 14; Pre-Drive, n=33, 28, 32, 28Day 14; Post-Drive, n=33, 28, 32, 28Day 14; Post-Pre Drive Difference, n=33,28,32,28Day 15; Pre-Drive, n=33, 27, 33, 28Day 15; Post-Drive, n=33, 27, 32, 27Day 15; Post-Pre Drive Difference, n=33,27,32,27Day 16; Pre-Drive, n=32, 28, 33, 28Day 16; Post-Drive, n=31, 28, 33, 28Day 16; Post-Pre Drive Difference, n=31,28,33,28
GEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo-2.63.25.90.2-6.1-6.30.8-3.6-4.5
GEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo-3.53.34.97.24.8-2.2-8.8-7.51.3
GEn Placebo and DPH 50 mg on Day 16-3.1-3.00.10.4-3.1-3.7-11.8-14.0-2.3
GEn Placebo and DPH Placebo4.57.73.11.5-3.2-4.76.314.37.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Day -1) to Day 14 (Evening) and Day 16 (at Tmax) and Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Day 15 (Morning After Dose) in Overall Speed Variability

Speed variability was defined as the standard deviation of the speed (measured in miles per hour). Participants were instructed to maintain a speed of 55 miles per hour during the test drive. Change from baseline in overall speed variability was calculated as the Day 14 (in the evening), 15 (in the morning), or 16 (at Tmax of GEn and DPH) mean speed variability over the 1-hour drive minus the Baseline (Days -1 and 1) mean speed variability over the 1-hour drive. (NCT01332318)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -1) and Days 14 and 16; baseline (Day 1) and Day 15

,,,
Interventionmiles per hour (Mean)
Day 14, n=33, 28, 33, 28Day 15, n=32, 28, 31, 27Day 16, n=30, 28, 33, 28
GEn 1200 mg and DPH Placebo-0.190.43-0.12
GEn 1800 mg and DPH Placebo-0.32-0.070.23
GEn Placebo and DPH 50 mg on Day 16-0.47-0.33-0.08
GEn Placebo and DPH Placebo-0.22-0.26-0.54

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

"Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR." (NCT01332630)
Timeframe: 8-24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TPI 28721

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS is measured from the initiation of treatment to the time of first disease progression or death due to any reason during the first drug administration in each arm. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% or more increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion or the appearance of new lesions. The PFS median of first drug pazopanib (treatment group) was compared to the PFS median of first drug temsirolimus (control group) in an adjusted Hazard ratio. The hazard ratio compares events from a treatment group to a control group. If the hazard ratio is greater than 1the treatment group performed better. If the hazard ratio is less than 1 the control group performed better. If the hazard ratio is equal to 1, then the groups performed equally. (NCT01392183)
Timeframe: Measured form start of treatment up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Temsirolimus (Control Group)2.7
Pazopanib (Treatment Group)5.2

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival is calculated from day of therapy initiation of the first administrated drug to the date of death. Kaplan-Meier estimator used to estimate the OS for each group of participants. The Overall Survival median of first drug pazopanib (treatment group) was compared to the Overall Survival median of first drug temsirolimus (control group) in an adjusted Hazard ratio. The hazard ratio compares events from a treatment group to a control group. If the hazard ratio is greater than 1the treatment group performed better. If the hazard ratio is less than 1 the control group performed better. If the hazard ratio is equal to 1, then the groups performed equally. (NCT01392183)
Timeframe: From the start of treatment up to 6 years or death, whichever came first

Interventionmonths (Median)
Temsirolimus (Control Group)7.1
Pazopanib (Treatment Group)11.9

[back to top]

Quality of Recovery 40 at 24 Hours

Scores on QOR (quality of recovery) 40 questionnaire.The QoR-40 score, which ranges from 40 to 200, representing very poor to outstanding quality of recovery, respectively. (NCT01451762)
Timeframe: 24 hours post operatively

Interventionunits on scale 40 (low) - 200 (high) (Median)
Placebo164
25 mg Diphenhydramine IV169
50 mg Diphenhydramine IV172

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With a Complete Response/Complete Control During the First 24 Hours After Neurological Surgery Under General Anesthesia

"To assess the efficacy of triple therapy with Scopolamine, Ondansetron and Dexamethasone for prevention of post operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in high risk patients during the first 24 hours after neurological surgery under general anesthesia.~- Proportion of patients with a complete response/complete control during the first 24 hours after neurological surgery under general anesthesia.~Complete Control is defined as no emetic episode, no need for rescue medication and no more than mild nausea overall after neurological surgery and general anesthesia.~Complete Response is defined as no vomiting and no rescue therapy after neurological surgery and general anesthesia." (NCT01474915)
Timeframe: 24 hours post operatively

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete ControlComplete Response
Aprepitant3830
Ondansetron4130

[back to top]

Post Operative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) Scores on a Verbal Response Scale

"To assess the efficacy of triple therapy with Scopolamine, Ondansetron and Dexamethasone for prevention of post operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in high risk patients during a delayed period after neurological surgery under general anesthesia.~- Assess the severity of nausea and vomiting during the first 24 hours after neurological surgery.~Nausea is evaluated by a standard verbal response scale (VRS) ranging from 0-10, 0 being no nausea and 10 being severe nausea. Vomiting is evaluated by the investigator or nursing staff numerically as either 0, no vomiting;, 1, mild vomiting;, 2, moderate vomiting;, or 3, severe vomiting." (NCT01474915)
Timeframe: 24 hours post-operatively

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Nausea episodesVomiting episodes
Aprepitant11.5
Ondansetron11.5

[back to top]

Quantify the Amounts of Phenergan Used Between the Two Groups.

(NCT01510379)
Timeframe: one week

Interventionmg (Mean)
Reletex42
Control57.6

[back to top]

Comparison of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Scores Between Groups Treated With a ReletexTM Device and Those Without the Device.

Post-operative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) Likert scale, 0-10 (0=no PONV, 10=worst PONV). (NCT01510379)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Reletex1.81
Control2.03

[back to top]

The Change in Numeric Rating Scale in Self-reported Nausea From Baseline Minus 60 Minutes of Treatment.

"The outcome measure for change was calculated from value at baseline minus value at 60 minutes. Subjects were asked to rate their nausea on a 0 (no nausea) to 10 (worst possible nausea) scale. Subjects who were eligible were randomly assigned to two sequences: one sequence used ABH gel first and then placebo; and the other sequence used placebo first and then ABH gel. We assumed that there was no carry-over effect from the first treatment to the second. A paired t-test was used to compare if ABH gel is not better than the placebo gel. A repeated measure analysis was used to compare the two treatment sequences. This endpoint was chosen as the drug gel because it is typically used as a prn (as needed) gel in actual practice, when relief is needed in short order." (NCT01556932)
Timeframe: 60 minutes after application

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
ABH Gel1.70
Placebo0.90

[back to top]

Skin Irritation Score After Patch Removal

Numbers of subjects with each skin irritation score. The scale scoring criteria are 0(-): Negative, 0.5(±): Faint erythema, 1(+): Erythema, 2(++): Erythema + edema, 3(+++): Erythema + edema + papules, serous papule, vesicles, 4(++++): Coalescing vesicles. (NCT01737931)
Timeframe: Up to 72 hours after patch removal

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
- (1 hour after patch removal)± (1 hour after patch removal)+ (1 hour after patch removal)- (24 hours after patch removal)± (24 hours after patch removal)+ (24 hours after patch removal)- (48 hours after patch removal)± (48 hours after patch removal)- (72 hours after patch removal)± (72 hours after patch removal)
No-treatment10.045.045.060.030.010.080.020.090.010.0
Topical Antihistamine5.655.638.952.636.810.594.75.394.75.3
Topical Steroid5.363.231.657.936.85.389.510.594.45.6

[back to top]

Itching of Application Site Evaluated by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

"Itching of application site evaluated by the visual analogue scale (VAS) 24 hours after 2 mg/24 hour patch removal (dose-escalation period) and difference between Steroid or Antihistamine and No-treatment.~The score ranges from 0 (no itching) to 100 (strongest imaginable itching)." (NCT01737931)
Timeframe: 24 hours after 2 mg/24 hr patch removal

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Topical Steroid1.6
Topical Antihistamine0.4
No-treatment0.9

[back to top]

Itching of Application Site Evaluated by VAS After Patch Removal

"Changes of itching of application site evaluated by VAS after patch removal (acceleration and dose-escalation periods).~The score ranges from 0 (no itching) to 100 (strongest imaginable itching)." (NCT01737931)
Timeframe: Up to 96 hours after patch removal

,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
3 hours after patch removal6 hours after patch removal24 hours after patch removal48 hours after patch removal72 hours after patch removal96 hours after patch removal
No-treatment-2.2-2.3-2.6-2.9-3.0-3.0
Topical Antihistamine-3.0-3.3-2.6-3.6-3.8-3.8
Topical Steroid-2.8-3.3-3.9-3.9-4.1-4.3

[back to top]

Skin Irritation Score of the Application Site

"Skin irritation score of the application site 24 hours after 2 mg/24 hour patch removal (dose-escalation period) and difference between Steroid or Antihistamine and No-treatment.~The scale scoring criteria are 0(-): Negative, 0.5(±): Faint erythema, 1(+): Erythema, 2(++): Erythema + edema, 3(+++): Erythema + edema + papules, serous papule, vesicles, 4(++++): Coalescing vesicles." (NCT01737931)
Timeframe: 24 hours after 2 mg/24 hr patch removal

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Topical Steroid0.237
Topical Antihistamine0.289
No-treatment0.250

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Achieve Adequate Sedation to Allow Colonoscopy (Defined as MOAA/S ≤3)

Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) scale. This scale ranges from 0 to 5, where 0 denotes general anesthesia, in which the patient has no response to painful stimuli, and 5 denotes a level of minimal sedation in which the patient is fully awake. (NCT01769586)
Timeframe: Approximately 10 minutes or less

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Diphenhydramine27
Midazolam65

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Sustained Headache Relief Assessed by Self-evaluation

"Sustained headache relief is defined as achieving a headache level of mild or none within two hours and maintaining a level of mild or none for 48 hours. Patient self-evaluated pain level is solicited every half hour for two hours in the Emergency Department and then by telephone 48 hours after discharge from emergency department" (NCT01825941)
Timeframe: up to 2 hours in Emergency Department, 48 hours after discharge from Emergency Department

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Metoclopramide + Diphenhydramine40
Metoclopramide + Placebo38

[back to top]

Apparent Body Clearance (CL/F) of Buprenorphine and Naloxone

Apparent body clearance (only for buprenorphine and naloxone), calculated as Dose/AUC0-inf. (NCT01846455)
Timeframe: before dosing (time 0; Baseline) and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 hours after dosing

,,,,
InterventionL/hr (Geometric Mean)
Buprenorphine (5,4,5,3,6)Naloxone (5,6,5,4,7)
HCV Without Hepatic Impairment2325874
Hepatic Impairment: Child-Pugh A1827448
Hepatic Impairment: Child-Pugh B1061824
Hepatic Impairment: Child-Pugh C78.3344
No Hepatic Disease or Impairment1935148

[back to top]

Apparent Volume of Distribution During Terminal Phase (Vz/F) of Buprenorphine and Naloxone

Apparent volume of distribution during terminal phase (only for buprenorphine and naloxone), calculated as Dose/(λz • AUC0-inf). (NCT01846455)
Timeframe: before dosing (time 0; Baseline) and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 hours after dosing

,,,,
InterventionLiters (Geometric Mean)
Buprenorphine (5,4,5,3,6)Naloxone (5,6,5,4,7)
HCV Without Hepatic Impairment958015845
Hepatic Impairment: Child-Pugh A722623150
Hepatic Impairment: Child-Pugh B695914353
Hepatic Impairment: Child-Pugh C63732272
No Hepatic Disease or Impairment917615294

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Buprenorphine, Norbuprenorphine, Naloxone and Naloxone-3-β-D-Glucuronide

"The extrapolation to infinity was done using the terminal phase.~AUC0-inf = AUC0-last + Ct/λz~Where Ct was the last observed quantifiable concentration and λz was the apparent terminal phase elimination rate constant." (NCT01846455)
Timeframe: before dosing (time 0; Baseline) and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 hours after dosing

,,,,
Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Buprenorphine (5,4,5,3,6)Norbuprenorphine (3,3,1,3,3)Naloxone (5,6,5,4,7)Naloxone-3-β-D-Glucuronide (5,7,6,5,4)
HCV Without Hepatic Impairment8.6113.90.085121.5
Hepatic Impairment: Child-Pugh A11.025.40.067121.9
Hepatic Impairment: Child-Pugh B18.917.10.27428.9
Hepatic Impairment: Child-Pugh C25.56.671.4521.3
No Hepatic Disease or Impairment10.316.00.097126.0

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-last) of Buprenorphine, Norbuprenorphine, Naloxone and Naloxone-3-β-D-Glucuronide

"AUC0-last was calculated for buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine, naloxone, and naloxone-3-β-D-glucuronide using non-compartmental analysis:~AUC0-last = AUC from time 0 to the time of the last measurable plasma concentration, calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule." (NCT01846455)
Timeframe: before dosing (time 0; Baseline) and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 hours after dosing

,,,,
Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
BuprenorphineNorbuprenorphineNaloxoneNaloxone-3-β-D-Glucuronide
HCV Without Hepatic Impairment7.029.910.096819.1
Hepatic Impairment: Child-Pugh A8.8912.50.072619.3
Hepatic Impairment: Child-Pugh B14.79.510.29127.9
Hepatic Impairment: Child-Pugh C25.22.251.2820.6
No Hepatic Disease or Impairment8.9515.00.091522.5

[back to top]

Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Buprenorphine, Norbuprenorphine, Naloxone and Naloxone-3-β-D-Glucuronide

(NCT01846455)
Timeframe: before dosing (time 0; Baseline) and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 hours after dosing

,,,,
Interventionhours (Median)
BuprenorphineNorbuprenorphineNaloxoneNaloxone-3-β-D-Glucuronide
HCV Without Hepatic Impairment1.381.001.000.750
Hepatic Impairment: Child-Pugh A1.251.250.8750.500
Hepatic Impairment: Child-Pugh B1.501.250.7500.750
Hepatic Impairment: Child-Pugh C1.000.8750.7500.500
No Hepatic Disease or Impairment1.751.001.130.500

[back to top]

Time of the Last Measureable Plasma Concentration (Tlast) of Buprenorphine, Norbuprenorphine, Naloxone and Naloxone-3-β-D-Glucuronide

(NCT01846455)
Timeframe: before dosing (time 0; Baseline) and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 hours after dosing

,,,,
Interventionhours (Median)
BuprenorphineNorbuprenorphineNaloxoneNaloxone-3-β-D-Glucuronide
HCV Without Hepatic Impairment71.514410.036.0
Hepatic Impairment: Child-Pugh A72.014410.024.0
Hepatic Impairment: Child-Pugh B12012024.024.1
Hepatic Impairment: Child-Pugh C16848.024.024.0
No Hepatic Disease or Impairment96.015610.036.0

[back to top]

Terminal Phase Elimination Rate-Constant (λz) of Buprenorphine, Norbuprenorphine, Naloxone and Naloxone-3-β-D-Glucuronide

For the determination of λz, only those data points judged to describe the terminal log-linear decline resulting in an adjusted coefficient of determination value (R2) > 0.7 were used in the regression. A minimum of 3 data points were used in calculating λz. (NCT01846455)
Timeframe: before dosing (time 0; Baseline) and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 hours after dosing

,,,,
Intervention1/hour (Geometric Mean)
Buprenorphine (6,5,5,5,7)Norbuprenorphine (4,6,5,4,4)Naloxone (5,6,5,4,7)Naloxone-3-β-D-Glucuronide (5,7,6,5,4)
HCV Without Hepatic Impairment0.01970.01350.3710.0637
Hepatic Impairment: Child-Pugh A0.02210.01680.3220.0974
Hepatic Impairment: Child-Pugh B0.01420.01310.1270.117
Hepatic Impairment: Child-Pugh C0.01230.01890.1510.152
No Hepatic Disease or Impairment0.01930.01670.3370.0937

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Buprenorphine, Norbuprenorphine, Naloxone and Naloxone-3-β-D-Glucuronide

(NCT01846455)
Timeframe: before dosing (time 0; Baseline) and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 hours after dosing

,,,,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
BuprenorphineNorbuprenorphineNaloxoneNaloxone-3-β-D-Glucuronide
HCV Without Hepatic Impairment0.9330.2030.03616.80
Hepatic Impairment: Child-Pugh A1.100.3580.02879.02
Hepatic Impairment: Child-Pugh B1.040.1800.07739.03
Hepatic Impairment: Child-Pugh C1.400.1280.3236.75
No Hepatic Disease or Impairment0.9130.2650.02868.12

[back to top]

Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of Buprenorphine, Norbuprenorphine, Naloxone and Naloxone-3-β-D-Glucuronide

Terminal elimination half-life, calculated as ln(2)/λz. The terminal phase elimination half-life was calculated over a period of at least 2 half-lives. (NCT01846455)
Timeframe: before dosing (time 0; Baseline) and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 hours after dosing

,,,,
Interventionhours (Geometric Mean)
Buprenorphine (6,5,5,5,7)Norbuprenorphine (4,6,5,4,4)Naloxone (5,6,5,4,7)Naloxone-3-β-D-Glucuronide (5,7,6,5,4)
HCV Without Hepatic Impairment35.251.21.8710.9
Hepatic Impairment: Child-Pugh A31.441.32.157.12
Hepatic Impairment: Child-Pugh B48.752.95.455.91
Hepatic Impairment: Child-Pugh C56.436.74.584.55
No Hepatic Disease or Impairment36.041.42.067.40

[back to top]

Percentage of Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity Due to Extrapolation (%AUCextrap) of Buprenorphine, Norbuprenorphine, Naloxone and Naloxone-3-β-D-Glucuronide

"Calculated as:~(AUC0-inf - AUC0-last)/AUC0-inf * 100~AUC0-inf, apparent body clearance (CL/F), and apparent volume of distribution during terminal phase (Vz/F) would not have been reported if %AUCextrap was > 20%." (NCT01846455)
Timeframe: before dosing (time 0; Baseline) and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 hours after dosing

,,,,
Interventionpercentage of AUC0-inf (Mean)
Buprenorphine (6,5,5,5,7)Norbuprenorphine (4,6,5,4,4)Naloxone (5,6,5,4,7)Naloxone-3-β-D-Glucuronide (5,7,6,5,4)
HCV Without Hepatic Impairment17.616.55.166.04
Hepatic Impairment: Child-Pugh A17.210.26.594.98
Hepatic Impairment: Child-Pugh B17.124.37.483.34
Hepatic Impairment: Child-Pugh C14.236.11.303.50
No Hepatic Disease or Impairment15.513.15.315.13

[back to top]

Speed Deviation

Driving performance assessment for the participants were measured by simulated driving test using Cognitive Research Corporation Driving Simulator (CRCDS-MiniSim). The assessment was performed after 45 minutes of awakening from approximately 6.5 hours of sleep on testing day (after 7.25 hours of study drug administration). Standard deviation of speed was reported in the outcome measure. (NCT01888497)
Timeframe: 7.25 hours post dose

Interventionmeters per second (m/sec) (Mean)
Placebo0.9
Gabapentin0.9
Diphenhydramine Citrate1.0
Triazolam1.3

[back to top]

Lane Exceedance

Driving performance assessment for the participants were measured by simulated driving test using Cognitive Research Corporation Driving Simulator (CRCDS-MiniSim). The assessment was performed after 45 minutes of awakening from approximately 6.5 hours of sleep on testing day (after 7.25 hours of study drug administration). Mean lanes excursed/exceeded was reported in the outcome measure. (NCT01888497)
Timeframe: 7.25 hours post-dose

Interventionlanes exceeded (Mean)
Placebo37.8
Gabapentin46.7
Diphenhydramine Citrate52.4
Triazolam147.7

[back to top]

Standard Deviation of Lateral Position (SDLP)

Driving performance assessment for the participants were measured by simulated driving test using Cognitive Research Corporation Driving Simulator (CRCDS-MiniSim). The assessment was performed after 45 minutes of awakening from approximately 6.5 hours of sleep on testing day (after 7.25 hours of study drug administration). SDLP was used to assess driver's ability to track their lane and was the standard deviation of lane positions through the entire drive. (NCT01888497)
Timeframe: 7.25 hours post-dose

Interventioncentimeter (cm) (Mean)
Placebo33.2
Gabapentin34.2
Diphenhydramine Citrate35.4
Triazolam47.4

[back to top]

Reduction of Itching in AD

"The ability of Aurstat to reduce itching in those diagnosed with Atopic Dermatitis aged 12-75 years of age.~Visual analog score (VAS assessment)- the VAS itch score was defined as the number of millimeters from the left side of a line (154 mm in length) that indicates their level of itching (0 mm (no itching)-154 mm (most itching))." (NCT01905631)
Timeframe: 3-days

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Untreated Control Group1.70
Treatment Group (Aurstat)1.55

[back to top]

24 Hour Follow up Amnesia Score

Patient were also asked to rate amnesia on a 10 point scale 24 after discharge. minimum= 0 (worse) maximum =10 (better) (NCT01967433)
Timeframe: At about 24 after the procedure

Interventionscore on a 10 point point scale (Mean)
Placebo7.8
Diphenhydramine6.5

[back to top]

Dosage of Midazolam

Moderate sedation (using the American Society of Anesthesiologists definition of maintaining purposeful response to verbal or tactile stimulation, adequate ventilation requiring no airway protection, and maintenance of cardiovascular function) was then achieved using incremental doses of the combination of intravenous midazolam (1 mg) and fentanyl (25 μg) given every 2 to 3 minutes. To minimize any crossover, additional diphenhydramine was not permitted. (NCT01967433)
Timeframe: From induction (first dose of sedative) to end of procedure

Interventionmg (Mean)
Diphenhydramine4.9
Placebo5.0

[back to top]

Dosage of Fentanyl

Moderate sedation (using the American Society of Anesthesiologists definition of maintaining purposeful response to verbal or tactile stimulation, adequate ventilation requiring no airway protection, and maintenance of cardiovascular function) was then achieved using incremental doses of the combination of intravenous midazolam (1 mg) and fentanyl (25 μg) given every 2 to 3 minutes. To minimize any crossover, additional diphenhydramine was not permitted. (NCT01967433)
Timeframe: From induction (first dose of sedative) to end of procedure

Intervention(μg) (Mean)
Diphenhydramine125.4
Placebo126.9

[back to top]

24 Hour Follow up Pain Score

"At 24 hr follow up patients were asked to rate the level of pain during the procedure using 10 point scale.~10 point visual analogue scale minimum= 0 (better) maximum =10 (worse)" (NCT01967433)
Timeframe: About 24 hours after the procedure

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Diphenhydramine2.0
Placebo3.09

[back to top]

Quality of Sedation

"Quality of sedation will be accessed by the nurse and the physician at the end of procedure.~Name: 10 point visual analogue scale Minimum score: 1 (worse) Maximum score: 10 (better)" (NCT01967433)
Timeframe: During the colonoscopy and 24 hours after discharge

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Physician ratingNurse rating
Diphenhydramine6.25.6
Placebo5.35.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Following adverse events will be recorded: (1)Hypoxia defined as O2 saturation less than 89% lasting for more than 30 seconds, (2)hypotension defined as systolic BP less than 90 mmhg and (3)use of reversal agents i.e Naloxone or Flumazenil (NCT01967433)
Timeframe: From induction (first dose of sedative) to discharge

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
HypotensionHypertensionDesaturationApneaArrhythmiaReversal agent useTachypnea
Diphenhydramine12500000
Placebo22300000

[back to top]

Duration of Procedure

Induction period (time from first dose of fentanyl to scope insertion), procedural time (time from scope insertion to scope out), and recovery time (time from scope out to discharge) were recorded by the nursing staff in their standard documentation. (NCT01967433)
Timeframe: Time from induction (first dose of sedative) to discharge

,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
Procedure timeRecoveryInduction
Diphenhydramine34.834.46.4
Placebo34.732.46.3

[back to top]

Change in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

"Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worse imaginable pain).~Change scores are calculated from baseline (pre-infusion) at 15 minutes after start of infusion, 30 minutes after start of infusion, and 30 minutes after infusion complete:~(15 minutes after start of infusion value - BL pre-infusion value) (30 minutes after start of infusion value - BL pre-infusion value) (30 minutes after infusion complete value - BL pre-infusion value)" (NCT01968694)
Timeframe: 15 minutes after start of infusion, 30 minutes after start of infusion, and 30 minutes after infusion complete from BL (pre-infusion)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
15 minutes after start of infusion change30 minutes after start of infusion change30 minutes after infusion complete change
IV Diphenhydramine-0.2-1.5-1.7
IV Lidocaine-2.6-3.5-3.6

[back to top]

Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

"The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) consists of 14 items rated from 0-3 and 2 subscales Depression (7 items) and Anxiety (7 items). A higher score on each item represents more of each symptom (i.e., more depression or more anxiety). Each subscale score is the sum of the 7 items from each subscale.~A score of 0-7 = Normal, 8-10=Borderline abnormal (borderline case), and 11-21=Abnormal (case).~Change scores are calculated from baseline (pre-infusion) at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month post-treatment:~(1 day post-treatment value - BL pre-infusion value)~(1 week post-treatment value - BL pre-infusion value)~(1 month post-treatment value - BL pre-infusion value)" (NCT01968694)
Timeframe: 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month post-treatment from BL (pre-infusion)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Anxiety 1 day changeAnxiety 1 week changeAnxiety 1 month changeDepression 1 day changeDepression 1 week changeDepression 1 month change
IV Diphenhydramine0-2-1.00-2-0.5
IV Lidocaine-1-10-0.5-1-1

[back to top]

Change in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): Pain on Average

"The Pain on Average score in the Brief Pain Inventory is rated from 0-10, where 0 is no pain, and 10 is pain as bad as you can imagine.~Change scores are calculated from baseline (pre-infusion) at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month post-treatment:~(1 day post-treatment value - BL pre-infusion value)~(1 week post-treatment value - BL pre-infusion value)~(1 month post-treatment value - BL pre-infusion value)" (NCT01968694)
Timeframe: 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month post-treatment from BL (pre-infusion)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
1 day change from BL1 week change from BL1 month change from BL
IV Diphenhydramine00-1
IV Lidocaine-2-2-1

[back to top]

Change in Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire 2

"Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire version 2 consists of 22 pain items (Throbbing, Shooting, Stabbing, Sharp, Cramping, Gnawing, Hot-burning, Aching, Heavy, Tender, Splitting, Tiring-exhausting, Sickening, Fearful, Punishing-cruel, Electric-shock, Cold-freezing, Piercing, Pain caused by light touch, Itching, Tingling or 'pins and needles', and Numbness). Each item is rated on a scale from 0-10, where 0=none, and 10=worst possible pain. The total pain score is the sum of these 22 items, ranging from 0-220.~Change scores are calculated from baseline (pre-infusion) at 30 minutes, 1 week, and 1 month post-treatment:~(30 minutes post-treatment value - BL pre-infusion value)~(1 week post-treatment value - BL pre-infusion value)~(1 month post-treatment value - BL pre-infusion value)" (NCT01968694)
Timeframe: 30 minutes, 1 week, and 1 month post-treatment from BL (pre-infusion)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
30 minutes change from BL1 week change from BL1 month change from BL
IV Diphenhydramine-15-17-18
IV Lidocaine-14.5-184

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Duration of response was calculated from the date of initial documentation of a response (PR or better) to the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease, as defined in IMWG criteria. Disease progression (IMWG criteria): increase of 25 percent (%) from lowest response level in Serum M-component (the absolute increase must be >=0.5 g/dL) and/or; urine M-component (the absolute increase must be >=200 mg/24 hours) and/or; only in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain levels (absolute increase must be >10 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL); Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL or 2.65 millimole per liter [mmol/L]) that can be attributed solely to the plasma cell proliferative disorder. (NCT01985126)
Timeframe: Up to 14.4 Months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Daratumumab 8 mg/kgNA
Daratumumab 16 mg/kg7.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit

Clinical benefit rate defined as percentage of participants who achieved minimal response (MR) or better. MR: >=25% but <= 49% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in urine M-protein by 50%-89%. If present at baseline 25% to 49% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. (NCT01985126)
Timeframe: Up to 14.4 Months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Daratumumab 8 mg/kg22.2
Daratumumab 16 mg/kg34.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Response

Overall response defined as percentage of participants who achieved stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) or partial response (PR). Per IMWG criteria, sCR: is defined as normal free light chain (FLC) ratio, and absence of clonal plasma cells (PCs) by immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence or 2- to 4-color flow cytometry; CR: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5 % plasma cells in bone marrow; VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or >= 90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level < 100mg/24 hours; PR: >= 50 % reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hour urinary M-protein by >= 90% or to <200 mg/24 hours; if the serum and urine M-protein are not measurable, a decrease of >=50% in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels is required in place of the M-protein criteria. (NCT01985126)
Timeframe: Up to 14.4 Months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Daratumumab 8 mg/kg11.1
Daratumumab 16 mg/kg29.2

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the date of first dose of daratumumab and either disease progression or death, whichever occurs first. (NCT01985126)
Timeframe: Up to 14.4 Months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Daratumumab 8 mg/kg4.86
Daratumumab 16 mg/kg3.65

[back to top]

Time to Disease Progression

Time to progression was defined as the number of days from the date of first dose of daratumumab to the date of first record of disease progression. (NCT01985126)
Timeframe: Up to 14.4 Months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Daratumumab 8 mg/kg4.86
Daratumumab 16 mg/kg3.71

[back to top]

Time to Response

Time to response was defined as the time from the date of first dose of daratumumab to the date of initial documentation of a response (PR or better). (NCT01985126)
Timeframe: Up to 14.4 Months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Daratumumab 8 mg/kg0.99
Daratumumab 16 mg/kg0.99

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the number of days from administration of the first infusion (Day 1) to date of death. Median Overall Survival was estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT01985126)
Timeframe: Approximately up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Daratumumab 8 mg/kg19.45
Daratumumab 16 mg/kg18.60

[back to top]

Duration in Days of Adverse Events (AEs)- Including Infection, Wound Complications, Post-transplant Diabetes, Hemorrhagic Cystitis and Malignancy

AEs reported as an infection, wound complication, post-transplant diabetes, hemorrhagic cystitis and/or malignancy. Time (in days) from the start date of the AE until the end date of the AE. Two events contributed to this calculation. (NCT02029638)
Timeframe: First Dose of Study Medication to End of Study (Up to 25 Months After Enrollment)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Enrolled, Transplanted9.5

[back to top]

Histological Severity of Biopsies Demonstrating Acute Rejection as Defined by Banff 2007 Classification Renal Allograft Pathology

This outcome includes results from biopsies with proven acute renal allograft rejection according to the 2007 Banff Classification Renal Allograft Pathology. A Banff result of indeterminate is not classified as rejection. (NCT02029638)
Timeframe: Transplant to End of Study (Up to 25 months After Enrollment)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Acute Cellular Rejection Banff Grade IAAcute Cellular Rejection Banff Grade IBAcute Cellular Rejection Banff Grade IIAAcute Cellular Rejection Banff Grade IIBAcute Cellular Rejection Banff Grade IIIAcute Antibody Mediated Rejection
Enrolled, Transplanted000000

[back to top]

Number of Transplanted Participants With Engraftment Syndrome

Engraftment syndrome is a complication that can occur following bone marrow transplant. The presence of engraftment syndrome is diagnosed by monitoring the common symptoms, which include: fever, rash, fluid in the lungs, and serum creatinine values above 4 mg/dL occurring within a week of absolute neutrophil recovery (e.g., first day after three consecutive daily absolute neutrophil counts ≥ 500 per µL), without apparent other cause. (NCT02029638)
Timeframe: Transplant to End of Study (Up to 25 months After Enrollment)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Enrolled, Transplanted0

[back to top]

Number of Transplanted Participants With Chronic T Cell-Mediated or Antibody-Mediated Rejection

Outcome includes participants who experienced chronic T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection and progressive interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA), transplant glomerulopathy or chronic obliterative arteriopathy, without an alternative, non-rejection related cause. Reference: Banff 2007 Classification Renal Allograft Pathology definition of terms. (NCT02029638)
Timeframe: Transplant to End of Study (Up to 25 months After Enrollment)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Enrolled, Transplanted1

[back to top]

Number of Transplanted Participants With Acute Renal Allograft Rejection

Acute renal allograft rejection demonstrated either by biopsy or clinically (when a biopsy could not be performed). This measure includes participants with biopsy proven acute renal allograft rejection and those that have creatinine values 25% or greater relative to baseline for over 72 hours. Baseline serum creatinine is defined as the average of the lowest three serum creatinine values during 2 to 4 weeks post-transplant, excluding days on dialysis. (NCT02029638)
Timeframe: Transplant to End of Study (Up to 25 months After Enrollment)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Enrolled, Transplanted1

[back to top]

Number of Transplanted Participants Who Remained Off Immunosuppression for at Least 52 Weeks, Including Those in Whom the 52 Week Biopsy Was Not Performed

Number of transplanted participants who remained off immunosuppression for ≥52 weeks, including those in whom the 52 week biopsy was not performed. This outcome included participants who were able to withdrawal successfully from all immunosuppression medication and remain off all immunosuppression for 52 weeks after the completion of withdrawal. (NCT02029638)
Timeframe: Transplant to 52 Weeks after Discontinuation of All Immunosuppression

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Enrolled, Transplanted0

[back to top]

Number of Transplanted Participants Who Died

Number of participant deaths after receiving a transplant per protocol. (NCT02029638)
Timeframe: Transplant to End of Study (Up to 25 months After Enrollment)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Enrolled, Transplanted1

[back to top]

Percent of Participants Who Achieved Operational Tolerance

Operational tolerance is defined as remaining off all immunosuppression 52 weeks after completion of immunosuppression withdrawal, with no evidence of biopsy-proven allograft rejection and, with acceptable renal function defined as a serum creatinine that has increased no more than 25% above baseline at the primary endpoint visit. Baseline creatinine is defined as the average of the lowest three creatinine values during 2 to 4 weeks post-transplant, excluding days on dialysis. The endpoint is summarized with a two-sided, 95% exact binomial confidence interval. (NCT02029638)
Timeframe: Transplantation through 52 Weeks after Discontinuation of All Immunosuppression

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Enrolled, Transplanted0

[back to top]

Number of Transplanted Participants Who Developed Donor-Specific Antibody During Study Participation

Donor-specific antibodies are directed against antigens expressed on donor organs. These antibodies can result in an immune attack on the transplanted organ, increasing risk of graft loss and/or rejection. (NCT02029638)
Timeframe: Transplant to End of Study (Up to 25 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Enrolled, Transplanted0

[back to top]

Number of Transplanted Participants Who Developed Donor- Specific Antibody After Initiation of Immunosuppression Withdrawal

Donor-specific antibodies are directed against antigens expressed on donor organs. These antibodies can result in an immune attack on the transplanted organ, increasing risk of graft loss and/or rejection. (NCT02029638)
Timeframe: Initiation of Immunosuppression Withdrawal to End of Study (to 25 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Enrolled, Transplanted0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Free From Return to Immunosuppression for the Duration of the Study

Participants who were able to withdrawal successfully from all immunosuppression medication and remained off all immunosuppression medication for the remainder of the study. (NCT02029638)
Timeframe: Transplant to End of Study (Up to 25 Months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Enrolled, Transplanted0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing an Incidence of Graft-versus-Host Disease Post-Transplant

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a medical complication that can occur after a person receives transplanted tissue, most commonly occurring after a bone marrow transplant. The white blood cells from the donated tissue recognize the tissue recipient's cells as foreign. These donor cells then attack the recipient's cells. (NCT02029638)
Timeframe: Transplant to Two Years Post-Transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Enrolled, Transplanted1

[back to top]

Number of Days From Transplant to Platelet Count Recovery

Time (in days) from transplant to the first day of a platelet count of ≥20,000 per μL without a prior platelet transfusion in the preceding seven days. Low platelet numbers is associated with increased risk of bleeding and bruising. A healthy person has a platelet count ranging from 150,000 to 450,000 platelets per microliter of blood. (NCT02029638)
Timeframe: Transplant to Platelet Count Recovery

InterventionDays (Mean)
Enrolled, Transplanted36

[back to top]

Number of Days From Neutrophil Nadir to Absolute Neutrophil Recovery

Time (in days) from neutrophil nadir, the first day post-transplant on which the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) is below 500 per µL, to the first day after three consecutive daily ANCs ≥ 500 per µL. ANC is a measure of the number of neutrophils present in the blood. Neutrophils are a type of white blood cell that fight against infection. A healthy person has an ANC between 2,500 and 6,000 per µL. A value below 500 per µL means the risk of infection is higher. (NCT02029638)
Timeframe: Post-Transplant Neutrophil Nadir to Neutrophil Recover

InterventionDays (Mean)
Enrolled, Transplanted15

[back to top]

Duration in Days of Graft-versus-Host Disease in Transplanted Participants

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a medical complication that can occur after a person receives transplanted tissue, most commonly occurring after a bone marrow transplant. The white blood cells from the donated tissue recognize the tissue recipient's cells as foreign. These donor cells then attack the recipient's cells. Duration (in days) is measured as the time from the start of the GVHD event to the end of the GVHD event. (NCT02029638)
Timeframe: Transplant to Two Years Post-Transplant

InterventionDays (Mean)
Enrolled, Transplanted7

[back to top]

Number of Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity- Including Infection, Wound Complications, Post-Transplant Diabetes, Hemorrhagic Cystitis and Malignancy

AEs reported as an infection, wound complication, post-transplant diabetes, hemorrhagic cystitis and/or malignancy. Grades are based on National Cancer Institute--Common Terminology Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) Version 4.0. (NCT02029638)
Timeframe: First Dose of Study Medication to End of Study (Up to 25 Months After Enrollment)

,
InterventionEvents (Number)
Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5
Enrolled, Not Transplanted00000
Enrolled, Transplanted00200

[back to top]

Number of Adverse Events (AEs)- Including Infection, Wound Complications, Post-transplant Diabetes, Hemorrhagic Cystitis and Malignancy

AEs reported as an infection, wound complication, post-transplant diabetes, hemorrhagic cystitis and/or malignancy. (NCT02029638)
Timeframe: First Dose of Study Medication to End of Study (Up to 25 Months After Enrollment)

,
InterventionEvents (Number)
InfectionWound complicationsPost-transplant diabetesHemorrhagic cystitisMalignancy
Enrolled, Not Transplanted00000
Enrolled, Transplanted20000

[back to top]

Number of Days Post-Transplant to the First Episode of Acute Rejection Requiring Treatment

Number of days post-transplant to the first episode of acute rejection that required treatment. This includes acute rejection episodes requiring treatment that were not biopsy proven. (NCT02029638)
Timeframe: Transplant to End of Study (Up to 25 months After Enrollment)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Enrolled, Transplanted23

[back to top]

Percent of Participants Achieving WHO Risk Drinking Level Decrease of at Least 1 Level

For men, WHO low risk drinking (level 1) is defined as >0 grams of alcohol/day (g/d) to 40 g/d; moderate risk (level 2) as >40 g/d to 60 g/d; high risk (level 3) as >60 g/d to 100 g/d; and very high risk (level 4) as >100 g/d. For women, low risk (level 1) is defined as >0 g/d to 20 g/d; moderate risk (level 2) as >20 g/d to 40 g/d; high risk (level 3) as >40 g/d to 60 g/d; and very high risk (level 4) as >60 g/d. Abstinence was defined as no risk (level 0). (NCT02061293)
Timeframe: From Week 33 Up to Week 36

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Psilocybin89.6
Diphenhydramine64.4

[back to top]

Percent of Participants Achieving No Heavy Drinking Days

The Timeline Follow-back (TLFB) method is used in calculating the number of heavy drinking days. The TLFB is a method for assessing the number of drinks of alcohol on a daily basis over the previous 30 days. For each day in the recall period, the participant indicates the number of drinks of alcohol they consumed. The TLFB provides a calendar prompt and number of other memory aids (e.g., holidays, payday, and other personally relevant dates) to facilitate accurate recall of drug use during the target period. Heavy drinking is defined as ≥4 drinks per day for women and ≥5 drinks per day for men. (NCT02061293)
Timeframe: From Week 5 (1 week after first drug administration) up to Week 36

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Psilocybin33.3
Diphenhydramine11.1

[back to top]

Percent of Heavy Drinking Days

The Timeline Follow-back (TLFB) method is used to calculate the percent of heavy drinking days. The TLFB is a method for assessing the number of drinks of alcohol on a daily basis over the previous 30 days. For each day in the recall period, the participant indicates the number of drinks of alcohol they consumed. The TLFB provides a calendar prompt and number of other memory aids (e.g., holidays, payday, and other personally relevant dates) to facilitate accurate recall of drug use during the target period. Heavy drinking is defined as ≥4 drinks per day for women and ≥5 drinks per day for men. (NCT02061293)
Timeframe: Screening (Week 0)

Interventionpercentage of days (Mean)
Psilocybin56.48
Diphenhydramine48.57

[back to top]

Short Inventory of Problems (SIP-2R) Score

15-item self-report questionnaire assessing problems related to alcohol use. Items are ranked on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 3 (daily or almost daily). The total score range is 0-45; the higher the score, the more problems related to alcohol use. (NCT02061293)
Timeframe: Week 36

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Psilocybin6.59
Diphenhydramine13

[back to top]

Short Inventory of Problems (SIP-2R) Score

15-item self-report questionnaire assessing problems related to alcohol use. Items are ranked on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 3 (daily or almost daily). The total score range is 0-45; the higher the score, the more problems related to alcohol use. (NCT02061293)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 4)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Psilocybin20.26
Diphenhydramine21.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Abstinence From Drinking

The Timeline Follow-back (TLFB) method is used in calculating abstinence from drinking. The TLFB is a method for assessing the number of drinks of alcohol on a daily basis over the previous 30 days. For each day in the recall period, the participant indicates the number of drinks of alcohol they consumed. The TLFB provides a calendar prompt and number of other memory aids (e.g., holidays, payday, and other personally relevant dates) to facilitate accurate recall of drug use during the target period. Abstinence is defined as zero drinks of alcohol over the target period. (NCT02061293)
Timeframe: From Week 5 (1 week after first drug administration) up to Week 36

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Psilocybin22.9
Diphenhydramine8.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Abstinence From Drinking

The Timeline Follow-back (TLFB) method is used in calculating abstinence from drinking. The TLFB is a method for assessing the number of drinks of alcohol on a daily basis over the previous 30 days. For each day in the recall period, the participant indicates the number of drinks of alcohol they consumed. The TLFB provides a calendar prompt and number of other memory aids (e.g., holidays, payday, and other personally relevant dates) to facilitate accurate recall of drug use during the target period. Abstinence is defined as zero drinks of alcohol over the target period. (NCT02061293)
Timeframe: From Week 33 up to Week 36

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Psilocybin47.9
Diphenhydramine24.4

[back to top]

Percent of Participants Achieving WHO Risk Drinking Level Decrease of at Least 3 Levels

For men, WHO low risk drinking (level 1) is defined as >0 grams of alcohol/day (g/d) to 40 g/d; moderate risk (level 2) as >40 g/d to 60 g/d; high risk (level 3) as >60 g/d to 100 g/d; and very high risk (level 4) as >100 g/d. For women, low risk (level 1) is defined as >0 g/d to 20 g/d; moderate risk (level 2) as >20 g/d to 40 g/d; high risk (level 3) as >40 g/d to 60 g/d; and very high risk (level 4) as >60 g/d. Abstinence was defined as no risk (level 0). (NCT02061293)
Timeframe: From Week 5 (1 week after first drug administration) up to Week 36

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Psilocybin29.92
Diphenhydramine13.3

[back to top]

Percent of Participants Achieving WHO Risk Drinking Level Decrease of at Least 3 Levels

For men, WHO low risk drinking (level 1) is defined as >0 grams of alcohol/day (g/d) to 40 g/d; moderate risk (level 2) as >40 g/d to 60 g/d; high risk (level 3) as >60 g/d to 100 g/d; and very high risk (level 4) as >100 g/d. For women, low risk (level 1) is defined as >0 g/d to 20 g/d; moderate risk (level 2) as >20 g/d to 40 g/d; high risk (level 3) as >40 g/d to 60 g/d; and very high risk (level 4) as >60 g/d. Abstinence was defined as no risk (level 0). (NCT02061293)
Timeframe: From Week 33 up to Week 36

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Psilocybin37.5
Diphenhydramine17.8

[back to top]

Percent of Participants Achieving WHO Risk Drinking Level Decrease of at Least 2 Levels

For men, WHO low risk drinking (level 1) is defined as >0 grams of alcohol/day (g/d) to 40 g/d; moderate risk (level 2) as >40 g/d to 60 g/d; high risk (level 3) as >60 g/d to 100 g/d; and very high risk (level 4) as >100 g/d. For women, low risk (level 1) is defined as >0 g/d to 20 g/d; moderate risk (level 2) as >20 g/d to 40 g/d; high risk (level 3) as >40 g/d to 60 g/d; and very high risk (level 4) as >60 g/d. Abstinence was defined as no risk (level 0). (NCT02061293)
Timeframe: From Week 5 (1 week after first drug administration) up to Week 36

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Psilocybin60.4
Diphenhydramine40

[back to top]

Percent of Heavy Drinking Days

The Timeline Follow-back (TLFB) method is used to calculate the percent of heavy drinking days. The TLFB is a method for assessing the number of drinks of alcohol on a daily basis over the previous 30 days. For each day in the recall period, the participant indicates the number of drinks of alcohol they consumed. The TLFB provides a calendar prompt and number of other memory aids (e.g., holidays, payday, and other personally relevant dates) to facilitate accurate recall of drug use during the target period. Heavy drinking is defined as ≥4 drinks per day for women and ≥5 drinks per day for men. (NCT02061293)
Timeframe: Follow Up (Weeks 5-36)

Interventionpercentage of days (Mean)
Psilocybin9.71
Diphenhydramine23.57

[back to top]

Percent of Heavy Drinking Days

The Timeline Follow-back (TLFB) method is used to calculate the percent of heavy drinking days. The TLFB is a method for assessing the number of drinks of alcohol on a daily basis over the previous 30 days. For each day in the recall period, the participant indicates the number of drinks of alcohol they consumed. The TLFB provides a calendar prompt and number of other memory aids (e.g., holidays, payday, and other personally relevant dates) to facilitate accurate recall of drug use during the target period. Heavy drinking is defined as ≥4 drinks per day for women and ≥5 drinks per day for men. (NCT02061293)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 4)

Interventionpercentage of days (Mean)
Psilocybin24.11
Diphenhydramine21.31

[back to top]

Percent of Drinking Days

The Timeline Follow-back (TLFB) method is used to calculate the percentage of days that participants drank alcohol. The TLFB is a method for assessing the number of drinks of alcohol on a daily basis over the previous 30 days. For each day in the recall period, the participant indicates the number of drinks of alcohol they consumed. The TLFB provides a calendar prompt and number of other memory aids (e.g., holidays, payday, and other personally relevant dates) to facilitate accurate recall of drug use during the target period. (NCT02061293)
Timeframe: Follow Up (Weeks 5-36)

Interventionpercentage of days (Mean)
Psilocybin29.39
Diphenhydramine42.83

[back to top]

Drinks Per Day

The Timeline Follow-back (TLFB) method is used to calculate drinks per day. The TLFB is a method for assessing the number of drinks of alcohol on a daily basis over the previous 30 days. For each day in the recall period, the participant indicates the number of drinks of alcohol they consumed. The TLFB provides a calendar prompt and number of other memory aids (e.g., holidays, payday, and other personally relevant dates) to facilitate accurate recall of drug use during the target period. (NCT02061293)
Timeframe: Screening (Week 0)

Interventiondrinks per day (Mean)
Psilocybin5.2
Diphenhydramine4.38

[back to top]

Drinks Per Day

The Timeline Follow-back (TLFB) method is used to calculate drinks per day. The TLFB is a method for assessing the number of drinks of alcohol on a daily basis over the previous 30 days. For each day in the recall period, the participant indicates the number of drinks of alcohol they consumed. The TLFB provides a calendar prompt and number of other memory aids (e.g., holidays, payday, and other personally relevant dates) to facilitate accurate recall of drug use during the target period. (NCT02061293)
Timeframe: Follow Up (Weeks 5-36)

Interventiondrinks per day (Mean)
Psilocybin1.17
Diphenhydramine2.26

[back to top]

Percent of Participants Achieving No Heavy Drinking Days

The Timeline Follow-back (TLFB) method is used in calculating the number of heavy drinking days. The TLFB is a method for assessing the number of drinks of alcohol on a daily basis over the previous 30 days. For each day in the recall period, the participant indicates the number of drinks of alcohol they consumed. The TLFB provides a calendar prompt and number of other memory aids (e.g., holidays, payday, and other personally relevant dates) to facilitate accurate recall of drug use during the target period. Heavy drinking is defined as ≥4 drinks per day for women and ≥5 drinks per day for men. (NCT02061293)
Timeframe: From Week 33 Up to Week 36

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Psilocybin62.5
Diphenhydramine40

[back to top]

Percent of Drinking Days

The Timeline Follow-back (TLFB) method is used to calculate the percentage of days that participants drank alcohol. The TLFB is a method for assessing the number of drinks of alcohol on a daily basis over the previous 30 days. For each day in the recall period, the participant indicates the number of drinks of alcohol they consumed. The TLFB provides a calendar prompt and number of other memory aids (e.g., holidays, payday, and other personally relevant dates) to facilitate accurate recall of drug use during the target period. (NCT02061293)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 4)

Interventionpercentage of days (Mean)
Psilocybin52.98
Diphenhydramine45.99

[back to top]

Percent of Participants Achieving WHO Risk Drinking Level Decrease of at Least 1 Level

For men, WHO low risk drinking (level 1) is defined as >0 grams of alcohol/day (g/d) to 40 g/d; moderate risk (level 2) as >40 g/d to 60 g/d; high risk (level 3) as >60 g/d to 100 g/d; and very high risk (level 4) as >100 g/d. For women, low risk (level 1) is defined as >0 g/d to 20 g/d; moderate risk (level 2) as >20 g/d to 40 g/d; high risk (level 3) as >40 g/d to 60 g/d; and very high risk (level 4) as >60 g/d. Abstinence was defined as no risk (level 0). (NCT02061293)
Timeframe: From Week 5 (1 week after first drug administration) up to Week 36

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Psilocybin83.3
Diphenhydramine71.1

[back to top]

Percent of Participants Achieving WHO Risk Drinking Level Decrease of at Least 2 Levels

For men, WHO low risk drinking (level 1) is defined as >0 grams of alcohol/day (g/d) to 40 g/d; moderate risk (level 2) as >40 g/d to 60 g/d; high risk (level 3) as >60 g/d to 100 g/d; and very high risk (level 4) as >100 g/d. For women, low risk (level 1) is defined as >0 g/d to 20 g/d; moderate risk (level 2) as >20 g/d to 40 g/d; high risk (level 3) as >40 g/d to 60 g/d; and very high risk (level 4) as >60 g/d. Abstinence was defined as no risk (level 0). (NCT02061293)
Timeframe: From Week 33 Up to Week 36

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Psilocybin60.4
Diphenhydramine40

[back to top]

Percent of Drinking Days

The Timeline Follow-back (TLFB) method is used to calculate the percentage of days that participants drank alcohol. The TLFB is a method for assessing the number of drinks of alcohol on a daily basis over the previous 30 days. For each day in the recall period, the participant indicates the number of drinks of alcohol they consumed. The TLFB provides a calendar prompt and number of other memory aids (e.g., holidays, payday, and other personally relevant dates) to facilitate accurate recall of drug use during the target period. (NCT02061293)
Timeframe: Screening (Week 0)

Interventionpercentage of days (Mean)
Psilocybin78.03
Diphenhydramine71.68

[back to top]

Drinks Per Day

The Timeline Follow-back (TLFB) method is used to calculate drinks per day. The TLFB is a method for assessing the number of drinks of alcohol on a daily basis over the previous 30 days. For each day in the recall period, the participant indicates the number of drinks of alcohol they consumed. The TLFB provides a calendar prompt and number of other memory aids (e.g., holidays, payday, and other personally relevant dates) to facilitate accurate recall of drug use during the target period. (NCT02061293)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 4)

Interventiondrinks per day (Mean)
Psilocybin2.77
Diphenhydramine2.19

[back to top]

Change in Cough Reflex Sensitivity to Capsaicin

increase in C5 (decrease in cough reflex sensitivity). Capsaicin cough challenge involves subjects breathing in incremental doubling concentrations of aerosolized capsaicin, 1 minute apart, until the concentration of capsaicin (micromolar) inducing 5 or more coughs (C5) is reached. (NCT02062710)
Timeframe: 2 hours after study drug administration

Interventionlog C5 (uM) (Mean)
Diphenhydramine/Phenylephrine/Cocoa0.97
Dextromethorphan0.80
Placebo0.57

[back to top]

Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)

"BDI-II items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3 based on severity of each item. The maximum total score is 63.~0-13 Indicates minimal depression 14-19 Indicates mild depression 20-28 Indicates Moderate depression 29-63 Indicates Severe depression" (NCT02106325)
Timeframe: 120 min post-infusion

InterventionScored units on a scale (Mean)
Ketamine20.00
Diphenhydramine24.72

[back to top]

Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSSI)

"BDI-II items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3 based on severity of each item. The maximum total score is 63.~0-13 Indicates minimal depression 14-19 Indicates mild depression 20-28 Indicates Moderate depression 29-63 Indicates Severe depression" (NCT02106325)
Timeframe: 40 minutes post-infusion

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ketamine1.58
Diphenhydramine1.08

[back to top]

Change in Treatment Alliance Score

The I-TAS is a 10-item, Likert-style rating scale designed to assess a patient's composite treatment alliance as it develops across multi-disciplinary treatment components. The I-TAS was intended to measure the primary alliance factors identified by Hatcher and Barends (1996) of bond, goals and collaboration. Each question is scored on a scale of 0 (Completely False) to 6 (Completely True). Total scores on the ITAS range from 0 to 60, with higher scores representing greater alliance with the treatment team (better outcome). The reported score is an average of each participant's total score on the ITAS. (NCT02106325)
Timeframe: Baseline and 16 weeks

InterventionScored units on a scale (Mean)
Ketamine43.52
Diphenhydramine53.15

[back to top]

Evaluate the Effects of Ketamine on Depressive Symptomatology by Measuring Change in Score on the Montgomery-Asberg Depressive Rating Scale

"40 Minutes Post Infusion, The MADRS-S instrument has nine questions, with an overall score ranging from 0 to 54 points.~0 to 6 - normal /symptom absent 7 to 19 - mild depression 20 to 34 - moderate depression >34 - severe depression." (NCT02106325)
Timeframe: Baseline and 16 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ketamine28.82
Diphenhydramine25.20

[back to top]

Hamilton Depression Scale (Ham-D)

"Although the HAM-D form lists 21 items, the scoring is based on the first 17. It generally takes 15-20 minutes to complete the interview and score the results. Eight items are scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 = not present to 4 = severe. Nine are scored from 0-2.~Sum the scores from the first 17 items 0-7= Normal 8-13= Mild Depression 14-18= Moderate Depression 19-22= Severe Depression >23= Very Severe Depression" (NCT02106325)
Timeframe: 4-6 hours post-infusion

InterventionScored units on a scale (Mean)
Ketamine21.48
Diphenhydramine17.00

[back to top]

Inpatient Treatment Alliance Scale (ITAS)

The I-TAS is a 10-item, Likert-style rating scale designed to assess a patient's composite treatment alliance as it develops across multi-disciplinary treatment components. The I-TAS was intended to measure the primary alliance factors identified by Hatcher and Barends (1996) of bond, goals and collaboration. Each question is scored on a scale of 0 (Completely False) to 6 (Completely True). Total scores on the ITAS range from 0 to 60, with higher scores representing greater alliance with the treatment team (better outcome). The reported score is an average of each participant's total score on the ITAS. (NCT02106325)
Timeframe: 7 days post-infusion

InterventionScored units on ITAS Scale (Mean)
Ketamine43.52
Diphenhydramine53.15

[back to top]

Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale Suicide Ideation Item (MADRS-SI)

"40 Minutes Post Infusion, The MADRS-S instrument has nine questions, with an overall score ranging from 0 to 54 points.~0 to 6 - normal /symptom absent 7 to 19 - mild depression 20 to 34 - moderate depression >34 - severe depression." (NCT02106325)
Timeframe: 40 minutes post-infusion

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ketamine0.83
Diphenhydramine0.75

[back to top]

Length of Inpatient Stay

(NCT02106325)
Timeframe: 2 Weeks Post-infusion

InterventionDays (Mean)
Ketamine6.33
Diphenhydramine7.80

[back to top]

Outpatient Follow-up Compliance

Scoring System: 0= not compliant, 1=compliant (NCT02106325)
Timeframe: 1 Day

Interventionunits on follow up compliance scale (Mean)
Ketamine0.73
Diphenhydramine.70

[back to top]

Yaw Perceptual Motion Threshold

"This is a perceptual self-motion threshold that measures the precision of the vestibular system. It is analogous to an audiogram, but for motion. Subjects sat on a motorized platform which repeatedly provided them with small motions to the left or right. After each motion subjects report whether they perceived a motion to the left or right. Based on subject responses, a psychometric curve fit is performed that determines the threshold (the standard deviation of the underlying cumulative Gaussian). Yaw rotation means rotations about an axis that is perpendicular to gravity.~This outcome measure applies only to arm 5 subjects." (NCT02136420)
Timeframe: 2 sessions separated by at least four days; measurements made 2 hrs after ingestion of medication

,
Interventiondeg per sec (Geometric Mean)
PlaceboPromethazine
Perceptual Thresholds,Drug Then Placebo.83.86
Perceptual Thresholds,Placebo Then Drug.921.06

[back to top]

Roll Perceptual Motion Threshold

"This is a perceptual self-motion threshold that measures the precision of the vestibular system. It is analogous to an audiogram, but for motion. Subjects sat on a motorized platform which repeatedly provided them with small motions to the left or right. After each motion subjects report whether they perceived a motion to the left or right. Based on subject responses, a psychometric curve fit is performed that determines the threshold (the standard deviation of the underlying cumulative Gaussian). Roll tilt means rotations about an axis that is Earth-horizontal.~This outcome measure applies only to arm 5 subjects." (NCT02136420)
Timeframe: 2 sessions separated by at least four days; measurements made 2 hrs after ingestion of medication

,
Interventiondeg per sec (Geometric Mean)
PlaceboPromethazine
Perceptual Thresholds,Drug Then Placebo.27.39
Perceptual Thresholds,Placebo Then Drug.32.39

[back to top]

Interaural Perceptual Motion Threshold

"This is a perceptual self-motion threshold that measures the precision of the vestibular system. It is analogous to an audiogram, but for motion. Subjects sat on a motorized platform which repeatedly provided them with small motions to the left or right. After each motion subjects report whether they perceived a motion to the left or right. Based on subject responses, a psychometric curve fit is performed that determines the threshold (the standard deviation of the underlying cumulative Gaussian). Interaural translation refers to translations in the horizontal plane to the subject's left or right.~This outcome measure applies only to arm 5 subjects." (NCT02136420)
Timeframe: 2 sessions separated by at least four days; measurements made 2 hrs after ingestion of medication

,
Interventioncm per sec (Geometric Mean)
PlaceboPromethazine
Perceptual Thresholds,Drug Then Placebo.57.77
Perceptual Thresholds,Placebo Then Drug.78.80

[back to top]

Percent Change in Roll Tilt Perception After Exposure to Hypogravity

"Note that this applies to arms 1-4 only.~Subjects sat on a chair on a moving platform on top of a centrifuge that created an artificial gravity environment. Subjects were repeatedly roll tilted to angles between 11 and 19 degrees, and then reported their perceived tilt angle using a subjective visual vertical task. They did this while experiencing centripetal acceleration equivalent to Earth gravity (1 Gz), and then hypogravity (0.5 Gz). We hypothesized that, after entering hypogravity, subjects would tend to underestimate their tilt angle. We calculated the percent change in their perception of tilt between 1 Gz and 0.5 Gz." (NCT02136420)
Timeframe: 1 session

Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Training, Placebo27.0

[back to top]

Percent Change in Manual Control Performance After Exposure to Hypogravity

"Note that this applies to arms 6-9 only.~Subjects sat on a chair on a moving platform on top of a centrifuge that created an artificial gravity environment. Subjects completed a manual control task in which their charge was randomly perturbed in roll tilt, and they used a joystick to attempt to keep themselves aligned with upright, while in the dark. They did this while experiencing centripetal acceleration equivalent to Earth gravity (1 Gz), and then hypogravity (0.5 Gz). We calculated their performance by calculating the standard deviation of chair position across time, with a smaller number indicating better performance. Then we calculated the percent change in their performance between 1 Gz and 0.5 Gz." (NCT02136420)
Timeframe: 1 session

Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Training, Placebo75.4

[back to top]

Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)

Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is assessed by physical neurological examination of the subject by a qualified neurologist. GSC is a common scoring system used to describe the level of consciousness in a person following a traumatic brain injury. The initial score correlates with the severity of brain injury and prognosis. It estimates Coma severity based on Eye (4), Verbal (5), and Motor (6) criteria with the following total score of between 3 (indicating deep unconsciousness) and 15 (indicating no issues). (NCT02142712)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionGlasgow Coma Scale (Number)
Famotidine15
Pantoprazole15
Diphenhydramine15

[back to top]

National Institutes of Health Stroke Severity (NIHSS) Scale

NIHSS is a tool used by healthcare providers to objectively quantify the degree of impairment caused by a stroke. It is composed of 11 items. Each item scores a specific ability between a score of 0-4. Usually, for each item, a score of 0 indicates normal function in that specific ability, while a higher score indicates some level of impairment. The individual scores from each item are added together to calculate a patient's total NIHSS score. The maximum possible score is 42, with the minimum score being a 0. (NCT02142712)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionNIHSS scale (Number)
Famotidine3
Pantoprazole3
Diphenhydramine0

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Grade 2 or Higher Hematologic Adverse Events (AEs) of Anemia, Neutropenia, and/or Thrombocytopenia

"The severity of adverse events (AEs) was classified into grades using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.0 (4/28/2009):~Grade 1 = mild AE~Grade 2 = moderate AE~Grade 3 = severe and undesirable AE~Grade 4 = life-threatening or disabling AE~Grade 5 = death" (NCT02188719)
Timeframe: Transplantation to 40 Weeks Post Transplantation

,
InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
AnemiaNeutropeniaThrombocytopenia
Cohort 166.716.716.7
Cohort 222.200

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Attributable to the Donor Alloantigen Reactive Tregs (darTregs) Infusion

"AEs classified by the site investigator/clinician as possibly or definitely related to the study treatment, the Donor Alloantigen Reactive Tregs (darTregs) infusion. These AEs include:~infusion reaction~Grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome (Reference: National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.0 (4/28/2009) grading criteria~malignant cellular transformation." (NCT02188719)
Timeframe: Transplantation to 40 Weeks Post Transplantation

InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
Cohort 20

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Infectious Adverse Event(s)

"The severity of infectious adverse events (AEs) was classified into grades as follows:~Grade 1 = asymptomatic; clinical or diagnostic observation only; intervention with oral antibiotic, antifungal, or antiviral agent only; no invasive intervention required~Grade 2 = symptomatic; intervention with intravenous antibiotic, antifungal, or antiviral agent; invasive intervention may be required~Grade 3 = any infection associated with hemodynamic compromise requiring pressors; any infection necessitating intensive care unit level of care; any infection necessitating operative intervention; any infection involving the central nervous system; any infection with a positive fungal blood culture; any proven or probable aspergillus infection; any tissue invasive fungal infection; any pneumocystis jiroveci infection~Grade 4 = life-threatening infection~Grade 5 = death resulting from infection" (NCT02188719)
Timeframe: Transplantation to 40 Weeks Post Transplantation

InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
Cohort 10
Cohort 211.1

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Wound Complication(s) Adverse Event(s)

"The severity of adverse events (AEs) was classified into grades using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.0 (4/28/2009):~Grade 3 wound complications are defined as Hernia without evidence of strangulation; fascial disruption/dehiscence; primary wound closure or revision by operative intervention indicated~Grade 4 complications are defined as Hernia with evidence of strangulation; major reconstruction flap, grafting, resection, or amputation indicated" (NCT02188719)
Timeframe: Transplantation to 40 Weeks Post Transplantation

InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
Cohort 10
Cohort 20

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Biopsy-Proven Acute and/or Chronic Rejection

"Biopsy-proven acute rejection graded as Mild, Moderate or Severe, per 1997 Banff classification. Chronic Rejection graded using Banff 2000 classification.~References: 1.) Banff Schema for Grading Liver Allograft Rejection: An International Consensus Document developed by an international panel of experts in liver transplantation pathology, hepatology, and surgery (Hepatology 1997; 25(3): 658-663). 2.) Update of the International Banff Schema for Liver Allograft Rejection: Working Recommendations for the Histopathologic Staging and Reporting of Chronic Rejection (Hepatology 2000; 31(3): 792-799)." (NCT02188719)
Timeframe: Transplantation to 40 Weeks Post Transplantation

,
InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
Mild Acute RejectionModerate Acute RejectionSevere Acute RejectionChronic Rejection
Cohort 10000
Cohort 211.1000

[back to top]

Mean Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Total Pain Reduction

Total pain reduction (mouth and throat) was measured by the numerical analogue scale of mouth pain on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0=no pain and 10=worst pain in the questionnaires taken at baseline, and 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240 minutes after assigned treatment for doxepin or DLA vs. placebo. The total pain reduction was calculated by the (average of mouth and throat) area under the curve (AUC) adjusting for baseline, with time scale (baseline, 5, 15, 30, 60, 120 and 240 minutes post treatment) replaced by a numerical scale of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 respectively. The AUC was prorated when there are terminal missing data. If the missing data were intermittent, simple imputation by trapezoidal rules were applied to calculate the AUC. If a patient cancelled, was missing baseline data, or only provided baseline data, he/she was excluded from the statistical analysis. (NCT02229539)
Timeframe: Baseline, 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240 minutes post treatment

Interventionunits on a scale*time scale (Mean)
Doxepin11.9
DLA (Diphenhydramine, Lidocaine and Antacid)11.7
Placebo8.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Sustained Complete Response

"The percentage of participants who achieved a sustained complete response, defined as a complete response achieved at Week 48 and Week 96.~Complete response was defined as meeting all of the following criteria:~Urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) < 0.5, based on a 24-hour collection;~Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥120 ml/min/1.73 m^2 calculated by the CKD-EPI formula or, if < 120 ml/min/1.73 m^2, then > 80% of eGFR at entry; and~Prednisone dose tapered to 10 mg/day and adherence to prednisone dosing provisions." (NCT02260934)
Timeframe: Week 48, Week 96

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide (RC)26.7
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide/Belimumab (RCB)28.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure by Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96

The percentage of participants who met the criteria for treatment failure, defined by withdrawal from the protocol treatment regimen due to worsening nephritis, infection, or study medication toxicity. (NCT02260934)
Timeframe: Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 0 to Week 24Week 0 to Week 48Week 0 to Week 96
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide (RC)18.245.563.6
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide/Belimumab (RCB)14.328.647.6

[back to top]

Count of Participants: Frequency of Non-renal Flares by Week 24

"Count of participants who experienced non-renal flares, defined as any new A finding in a non-renal organ system in the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) assessment. A BILAG A finding represents a significant increase in, or a new manifestation of, disease activity." (NCT02260934)
Timeframe: Week 24

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
0 Non-renal flares1 Non-renal flare2 Non-renal flares
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide (RC)2110
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide/Belimumab (RCB)2001

[back to top]

Count of Participants: Frequency of Non-renal Flares by Week 48

"Count of participants who experienced non-renal flares, defined as any new A finding in a non-renal organ system in the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) assessment. A BILAG A finding represents a significant increase in, or a new manifestation of, disease activity." (NCT02260934)
Timeframe: Week 48

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
0 Non-renal flares1 Non-renal flares2 Non-renal flare
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide (RC)2020
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide/Belimumab (RCB)2001

[back to top]

Count of Participants: Frequency of Non-renal Flares by Week 96

"Count of participants who experienced non-renal flares, defined as any new A finding in a non-renal organ system in the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) assessment. A BILAG A finding represents a significant increase in, or a new manifestation of, disease activity." (NCT02260934)
Timeframe: Week 96

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
0 Non-renal flares1 Non-renal flare2 Non-renal flares
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide (RC)1840
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide/Belimumab (RCB)1911

[back to top]

Frequency of Specific Adverse Events of Interest By Event by Week 96

"Number of ≥ Grade 2 specific treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) of interest. Grade 2 or higher AEs were classified according to the listed categories of interest based on the study team's review of the AEs.~Treatment-emergent AEs are those:~with an onset date on or after the first dose of study medication,~with onset before first dose but that worsened in severity after first dose, and~for which the start of the AE in relation to the start of study medication could not be established.~The severity of AEs was classified using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, v4.03: June 14, 2010). AEs were classified by system organ class and preferred term according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) version 17.0." (NCT02260934)
Timeframe: Week 96

,
InterventionEvents (Number)
Any event leading to death≥Grade 2 leukopenia or thrombocytopeniaPremature ovarian failureMalignancyVenous thromboembolic event
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide (RC)013003
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide/Belimumab (RCB)016000

[back to top]

Frequency of Specific Adverse Events of Interest By Participant, By Week 96

"Number of participants who experienced ≥Grade 2 specific treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) of interest. Grade 2 or higher AEs were classified according to the listed categories of interest based on the study team's review of the AEs.~Treatment-emergent AEs are those:~with an onset date on or after the first dose of study medication,~with onset before first dose but that worsened in severity after first dose, and~for which the start of the AE in relation to the start of study medication could not be established.~The severity of AEs was classified using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, v4.03: June 14, 2010). AEs were classified by system organ class and preferred term according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) version 17.0." (NCT02260934)
Timeframe: Week 96

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any event leading to death≥Grade 2 leukopenia or thrombocytopeniaPremature ovarian failureMalignancyVenous thromboembolic event
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide (RC)06002
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide/Belimumab (RCB)06000

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Hypocomplementemic for Complement Component C3 at Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96

"The percentage of participants who were hypocomplementemic for complement component, C3, defined as a C3 level <90 mg/dL.~Serum C3 complement is a protein which can be measured in the blood. Low blood levels of C3 are common in those with active lupus." (NCT02260934)
Timeframe: Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 24Week 48Week 96
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide (RC)57.155.061.1
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide/Belimumab (RCB)30.030.027.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Hypocomplementemic for Complement Component C4 at Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96

"The percentage of participants who were hypocomplementemic for complemen component C4, defined as a C4 level <10 mg/dL.~Serum C4 complement is a protein which can be measured in the blood. Low blood levels of C4 are common in those with active lupus." (NCT02260934)
Timeframe: Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 24Week 48Week 96
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide (RC)19.015.016.7
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide/Belimumab (RCB)5.015.011.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response at Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96

"The percentage of participants who achieved a complete response, defined as meeting all of the following criteria:~Urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) < 0.5, based on a 24-hour collection;~Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 120 ml/min/1.73 m^2 calculated by the CKD-EPI formula or, if < 120 ml/min/1.73 m^2, then > 80% of eGFR at entry; and~Prednisone dose tapered to 10 mg/day and adherence to prednisone dosing provisions." (NCT02260934)
Timeframe: Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 24Week 48Week 96
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide (RC)23.835.033.3
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide/Belimumab (RCB)30.042.142.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With an Negative Anti-dsDNA Result at Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96

"The percentage of participants who were anti-double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) negative, defined as having anti-dsDNA levels <30 IU/mL.~Anti-dsDNA levels are associated with systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity." (NCT02260934)
Timeframe: Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 24Week 48Week 96
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide (RC)14.320.00.0
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide/Belimumab (RCB)15.830.027.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With an Overall Response at Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96

"The percentage of participants who achieved an overall response, defined as meeting all of the following criteria:~>50% improvement in the urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) from study entry, based on a 24-hour collection;~Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥120 ml/min/1.73 m^2 calculated by the CKD-EPI formula or, if < 120 ml/min/1.73 m^2, then > 80% of eGFR at entry; and~Prednisone dose tapered to 10 mg/day and adherence to prednisone dosing provisions." (NCT02260934)
Timeframe: Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 24Week 48Week 96
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide (RC)46.760.053.3
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide/Belimumab (RCB)55.073.771.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With At Least One Grade 3 or Higher Infectious Adverse Event By Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96

"The percentage of participants who experienced at least one Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent infectious adverse event. The severity of adverse events (AEs) was classified into grades using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, v4.03:June 14, 2010). Treatment-emergent AEs are those:~with an onset date on or after the first dose of study medication,~with onset before first dose but that worsened in severity after first dose, and~for which the start of the AE in relation to the start of study medication could not be established.~AEs were classified by system organ class and preferred term according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) version 17.0. Grade 3 or higher AEs were classified infectious based on the study team's review of the MedDRA body systems and preferred terms of the AEs." (NCT02260934)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 96

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 0 to Week 24Week 0 to Week 48Week 0 to Week 96
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide (RC)9.122.727.3
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide/Belimumab (RCB)4.89.59.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With B Cell Reconstitution at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96

"The percentage of participants who achieved B cell reconstitution, defined as a peripheral blood total B cell count ≥ to the baseline count or the lower limit of normal, whichever was lower. Note: B cell depletion was expected to occur in this study between Weeks 0 and 4, after initiation of rituximab and cyclophosphamide.~Normal peripheral blood B Cell count: 107 to 698 cells/µL." (NCT02260934)
Timeframe: Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Week 24Week 48Week 96
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide (RC)31.335.740.0
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide/Belimumab (RCB)6.311.830.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Grade 4 Hypogammaglobulinemia by Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96

The percentage of participants who experienced Grade 4 hypogammaglobulinemia, defined as having a serum Immunoglobulin G (IgG) level < 300 mg/dL. Severity of adverse events (AEs) was classified using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, v4.03:June 14, 2010). (NCT02260934)
Timeframe: Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 0 to Week 24Week 0 to Week 48Week 0 to Week 96
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide (RC)000
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide/Belimumab (RCB)000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adequate Relief of Headache as a Measure of Efficacy

Number of participants with reduction in pain scores six hours post administration by at least 2 on the pain score scale. (NCT02295280)
Timeframe: Primary outcome was six hours post administration

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Metoclopramide IV & Diphenhydramine IV34
Codeine32

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate at Indicated Time Points

Respiratory rate was measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest. Values at Day -1 were considered as Baseline values. Change from Baseline was defined as difference between the post-Baseline visit value and the Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points (represented by n=X in the category titles) were analyzed. (NCT02339155)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Day 183

,
InterventionBreaths per minute (Mean)
Day 1, n=286, 280Day 29, n=283, 279Day 57, n=282, 276Day 183, n=273, 266
AVA Alone-0.4-0.1-0.1-0.3
AVA+Raxibacumab-0.3-0.1-0.1-0.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Temperature at Indicated Time Points

Temperature was measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest. Values at Day -1 were considered as Baseline values. Change from Baseline was defined as difference between the post-Baseline visit value and the Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points (represented by n=X in the category titles) were analyzed. (NCT02339155)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Day 183

,
InterventionDegree celsius (Mean)
Day 1, n=286, 280Day 29, n=283, 279Day 57, n=282, 276Day 183, n=272, 266
AVA Alone-0.04-0.04-0.05-0.04
AVA+Raxibacumab0.02-0.03-0.02-0.01

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Any Non-serious Adverse Event (AE)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE resulting in death, is life threatening (ie, an immediate threat to life), inpatient hospitalization, prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation which is medically important and may jeopardize the participant or may require medical or surgical intervention or events associated with liver injury and impaired liver function is categorized as SAE. The Safety population was comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of AVA. (NCT02339155)
Timeframe: Up to Day 183

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Non-serious AEsSAE
AVA Alone855
AVA+Raxibacumab803

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters Outside Normal Range

Blood samples were collected to evaluate clinical chemistry parameters, which included assessment of urea nitrogen (UN), creatinine, chloride, glucose, magnesium, total protein, potassium, chloride, total Carbon dioxide (CO2), sodium, calcium (cal), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), total and direct bilirubin ( D.bili), albumin and calculated creatinine clearance. Here high is equal to above the upper limit of the normal range, low is equal to below the lower limit of the normal range. Participants are counted in the category that their value changes to (low, normal or high), unless there is no change in their category. Only those participants available at the specified time points (represented by n=X in the category titles) were analyzed. (NCT02339155)
Timeframe: Up to Day 57

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Albumin g/L, Low, Week 4, n=283, 279Albumin g/L, High, Week 4, n=283, 279Albumin g/L, Low, Week 8, n=282, 275Albumin g/L, High, Week 8, n=282, 275ALP units/liter (U/L), Low, Week 4, n=283, 279ALP U/L, High, Week 4, n=283, 279ALP U/L, Low, Week 8, n=282, 275ALP U/L, High, Week 8, n=282, 275ALT U/L, Low, Week 4, n=283, 279ALT U/L, High, Week 4, n=283, 279ALT U/L, Low, Week 8, n=282, 275ALT U/L, High, Week 8, n=282, 275AST U/L, Low, Week 4, n=283, 279AST U/L, High, Week 4, n=283, 279AST U/L, Low, Week 8, n=282, 275AST U/L, High, Week 8, n=282, 275D.bili micromole/Liter (µmol/L) LowWeek4,n=274,263D.bili µmol/L, High, Week 4, n=274, 263D.bili µmol/L, Low, Week 8, n=274, 261D.bili µmol/L, High, Week 8, n=274, 261Bili µmol/L, Low, Week 4, n=280, 279Bili µmol/L, High, Week 4, n=280, 279Bili µmol/L, Low, Week 8, n=280, 273Bili µmol/L, High, Week 8, n=280, 273Cal,millimole/Liter (mmol/L)Low,Week 4,n=283, 279Cal mmol/L, High, Week 4, n=283, 279Cal mmol/L, Low, Week 8, n=282, 275Cal mmol/L, High, Week 8, n=282, 275Chloride mmol/L, Low, Week 4, n=283, 279Chloride mmol/L, High, Week 4, n=283, 279Chloride mmol/L, Low, Week 8, n=282, 275Chloride mmol/L, High, Week 8, n=282, 275CO2 mmol/L, Low, Week 4, n=283, 279CO2 mmol/L, High, Week 4, n=283, 279CO2 mmol/L, Low, Week 8, n=282, 275CO2 mmol/L, High, Week 8, n=282, 275Creatinine µmol/L, Low, Week 4, n=283, 279Creatinine µmol/L, High, Week 4, n=283, 279Creatinine µmol/L, Low, Week 8, n=282, 275Creatinine µmol/L, High, Week 8, n=282, 275GGT U/L, Low, Week 4, n=283, 279GGT U/L, High, Week 4, n=283, 279GGT U/L, Low, Week 8, n=282, 275GGT U/L, High, Week 8, n=282, 275Glucose mmol/L, Low, Week 4, n=283, 279Glucose mmol/L, High, Week 4, n=283, 279Glucose mmol/L, Low, Week 8, n=282, 275Glucose mmol/L, High, Week 8, n=282, 275Potassium mmol/L, Low, Week 4, n=283, 279Potassium mmol/L, High, Week 4, n=283, 279Potassium mmol/L, Low, Week 8, n=282, 275Potassium mmol/L, High, Week 8, n=282, 275Magnesium mmol/L, Low, Week 4, n=283, 279Magnesium mmol/L, High, Week 4, n=283, 279Magnesium mmol/L, Low, Week 8, n=282, 275Magnesium mmol/L, High, Week 8, n=282, 275Protein g/L, Low, Week 4, n=283, 279Protein g/L, High, Week 4, n=283, 279Protein g/L, Low, Week 8, n=282, 275Protein g/L, High, Week 8, n=282, 275Sodium mmol/L, Low, Week 4, n=283, 279Sodium mmol/L, High, Week 4, n=283, 279Sodium mmol/L, Low, Week 8, n=282, 275Sodium mmol/L, High, Week 8, n=282, 275Urate µmol/L, Low, Week 4, n=283, 279Urate µmol/L, High, Week 4, n=283, 279Urate µmol/L, Low, Week 8, n=282, 275Urate µmol/L, High, Week 8, n=282, 275UN mmol/L, Low, Week 4, n=283, 279UN mmol/L, High, Week 4, n=283, 279UN mmol/L, Low, Week 8, n=282, 275UN mmol/L, High, Week 8, n=282, 275
AVA Alone61203142134573974173860505513262120019012714610196207841041716162131120000161164315254943938
AVA+Raxibacumab2010520219444426375341003094527441030120911121491031053369143116122121021017292616155744767

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters Outside Normal Range

Hematology parameters included assessment of platelet count, erythrocytes, leukocytes , reticulocyte count, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, basophils, hemoglobin and hematocrit. Here high is equal to above the upper limit of the normal range, low is equal to below the lower limit of the normal range. Participants are counted in the category that their value changes to (low, normal or high), unless there is no change in their category. Only those participants available at the specified time points (represented by n=X in the category titles) were analyzed. (NCT02339155)
Timeframe: Up to Day 57

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Eosinophils 10^9/Liter (L) Low, Week 4, n=282, 278Eosinophils 10^9/L High, Week 4, n=282, 278Eosinophils 10^9/L, Low, Week 8, n=281, 276Eosinophils 10^9/L, High, Week 8, n=281, 276Basophils 10^9/L, Low, Week 4, n=282, 278Basophils 10^9/L, High, Week 4, n=282, 278Basophils 10^9/L, Low, Week 8, n=281, 276Basophils 10^9/L, High, Week 8, n=281, 276Hematocrit percent (%) Low, Week 4, n=283, 279Hematocrit %, High, Week 4, n=283, 279Hematocrit %, Low, Week 8, n=281, 276Hematocrit %, High, Week 8, n=281, 276Hemoglobin gram/Liter (g/L) Low,Week 4,n=283, 279Hemoglobin g/L, High, Week 4, n=283, 279Hemoglobin g/L, Low, Week 8, n=281, 276Hemoglobin g/L, High, Week 8, n=281, 276Lymphocytes 10^9/L , Low, Week 4, n=282, 278Lymphocytes 10^9/L , High, Week 4, n=282, 278Lymphocytes 10^9/L, Low, Week 8, n=281, 276Lymphocytes 10^9/L, High, Week 8, n=281, 276MCH picogram (pg), Low, Week 4, n=283, 279MCH pg, High, Week 4, n=283, 279MCH pg, Low, Week 8, n=281, 276MCH pg, High, Week 8, n=281, 276MCHC g/L, Low, Week 4, n=283, 279MCHC g/L, High, Week 4, n=283, 279MCHC g/L, Low, Week 8, n=281, 276MCHC g/L, High, Week 8, n=281, 276MCV femtoliters (fL), Low, Week 4, n=283, 279MCV fL, High, Week 4, n=283, 279MCV fL, Low, Week 8, n=281, 276MCV fL, High, Week 8, n=281, 276Monocytes 10^9/L , Low, Week 4, n=282, 278Monocytes 10^9/L, High, Week 4, n=282, 278Monocytes 10^9/L, Low, Week 8, n=281, 276Monocytes 10^9/L, High, Week 8, n=281, 276Neutrophils 10^9/L, Low, Week 4, n=283, 279Neutrophils 10^9/L, High, Week 4, n=283, 279Neutrophils 10^9/L, Low, Week 8, n=281, 276Neutrophils 10^9/L, High, Week 8, n=281, 276Erythrocytes 10^12/L, Low, Week 4, n=283, 279Erythrocytes 10^12/L, High, Week 4, n=283, 279Erythrocytes 10^12/L, Low, Week 8, n=281, 276Erythrocytes 10^12/L, High, Week 8, n=281, 276Leukocytes 10^9/L, Low, Week 4, n=283, 279Leukocytes 10^9/L, High, Week 4, n=283, 279Leukocytes 10^9/L, Low, Week 8, n=281, 276Leukocytes 10^9/L, High, Week 8, n=281, 276Reticulocytes 10^12/L, Low, Week 4, n=283, 279Reticulocytes 10^12/L, High, Week 4, n=283, 279Reticulocytes 10^12/L, Low, Week 8, n=281, 276Reticulocytes 10^12/L, High, Week 8, n=281, 276Platelet 10^9/L, Low, Week 4, n=282, 279Platelet 10^9/L, High, Week 4, n=282, 279Platelet 10^9/L, Low, Week 8, n=280, 276Platelet 10^9/L, High, Week 8, n=280, 276
AVA Alone04070000726274733020202031931620300300735164261526111156041
AVA+Raxibacumab0605000061923110211401050317712212002018266478312210503134040

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Urinalysis Parameters

Urinalysis parameters included amorphous crystals, bacteria, bilirubin, calcium oxalate (Ca Ox) crystals, choriogonadotropin beta, clarity, color, crystals of Ca Ox, erythrocytes, glucose, hemoglobin, ketone bodies, ketones, leukocyte cell clumps, leukocyte esterase, leukocytes, mucous threads, nitrite, occult blood, protein, specific gravity, squamous epithelial cells, turbidity, urobilinogen, and transitional epithelial cells. In urinalysis test plus sign (+) indicates increase in the level of the parameters. (NCT02339155)
Timeframe: Day 57

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Amorphous crystals 1+Amorphous crystals 2+Amorphous crystals 3+Amorphous crystals 4+Amorphous crystals traceBacteria 1+Bacteria 2+Bacteria 3+Bacteria 4+Bacteria fewBacteria manyBacteria modBacteria OccBacteria rareBacteria traceBilirubin 1+Bilirubin negativeBilirubin smallCa Ox Crystals fewCa Ox Crystals rareChoriogonadotropin Beta negativeChoriogonadotropin Beta positiveClarity, clearClarity, cloudyClarity turbidColor amberColor colorlessColor light-redColor light-yellowColor yellowCrystals Ca-OxErythrocytes 0-2Erythrocytes 10-25Erythrocytes 2-5Erythrocytes 25-50Erythrocytes 5-10Erythrocytes 50-99Erythrocytes innumerableErythrocytes less than 1Erythrocytes TntcGlucose positiveGlucose negativeHemoglobin +Hemoglobin ++Hemoglobin +++Hemoglobin largeHemoglobin modHemoglobin negativeHemoglobin smallHemoglobin traceKetone bodies negativeKetone bodies traceKetones +Ketones ++Ketones ++++Ketones modKetones negativeKetones traceLeukocyte Cell Clumps OccLeukocyte Cell Clumps rareLeukocyte Esterase 1+Leukocyte Esterase 2+Leukocyte Esterase 3+Leukocyte Esterase largeLeukocyte Esterase ModLeukocyte Esterase ModerateLeukocyte Esterase negativeLeukocyte Esterase smallLeukocyte Esterase traceLeukocyte +Leukocyte ++Leukocyte +++Leukocyte 0-2Leukocyte 10-25Leukocyte 2-5Leukocyte 25-50Leukocyte 5-10Leukocyte less than 1Leukocyte largeLeukocyte modLeukocyte negativeLeukocyte smallLeukocyte traceMucous threads 2+Mucous Threads fewMucous Threads manyMucous Threads ModMucous Threads traceNitrite negativeNitrite positiveOccult Blood 1+Occult Blood 2+Occult Blood 3+Occult Blood largeOccult Blood modOccult Blood moderateOccult Blood negativeOccult Blood smallOccult Blood traceProtein +Protein ++Protein ++++Protein 1+Protein largeProtein negativeProtein non-heamProtein traceSpecific Gravity <=1.005Specific Gravity >=1.030Squamous Epithelial Cells 0-2Squamous Epithelial Cells 2-5Squamous Epithelial Cells 5-10Squamous Epithelial Cells <1Turbidity clearTurbidity cloudyTurbidity hazyUrobilinogen <2.0Urobilinogen less than 2.0Urobilinogen normalTransitional Epithelial Cells <1
AVA Alone17031120121135221960022413881210674910732011010112571301431741321140110125501141110111625135111052602841187290242111908110512163223720312441121382291521911333472
AVA+Raxibacumab5134221101027833188223160442051127117104061201400257183226166131106410202477012107341597100019927145551885712512219030213571482161001402380155635281531611131460

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Seroconvert, at Weeks 4, 8, and 26 (Days 29, 57 and 183) After the First AVA Dose, Between the AVA Alone and the AVA With Raxibacumab Treatment Groups

The percentage of participants, with corresponding 95% CI based on Wilson's method, who seroconvert (seroconversion is defined as a >4-fold increase in toxin neutralizing activity [TNA] titer) was summarized, at Weeks 4, 8 and 26 after the first AVA dose for both arms separately. Serum TNA titer was determined using a cell-based assay. (NCT02339155)
Timeframe: Days 29, 57 and 183

,
InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
Week 4Week 8Week 26
AVA Alone76.495.331.9
AVA+Raxibacumab99.398.132.0

[back to top]

Ratio of GMC of Anti-PA Ab at Weeks 8 and 26 (Days 57 and 183) After the First AVA Dose, Between the AVA Alone and AVA With Raxibacumab Treatment Groups

Anti-PA antibody concentrations were collected at Weeks 8 and 26 after the first AVA dose. Serum AVA derived anti-PA Ab concentrations were determined using an approved immunoassay. The GMCs with corresponding 95% CI were calculated for each treatment group at each timepoint. Only those participants available at the specified time points (represented by n=X in the category titles) were analyzed. (NCT02339155)
Timeframe: Days 57 and 183

,
Interventionµg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Week 8, n=275, 267Week 26, n=267, 258
AVA Alone50.47010.007
AVA+Raxibacumab46.09510.231

[back to top]

Ratio of Geometric Mean Concentrations (GMC) of Anti-protective Antigen (PA) Antibody (Ab) at 4 Weeks (Day 29) After the First AVA Dose (Prior to the Third AVA Dose), Between the AVA Alone and the AVA With Raxibacumab Treatment Groups

Ratio of the GMC of anti-PA Ab between AVA alone and the AVA with raxibacumab treatment group was assessed to compare the immunogenicity of AVA at 4 weeks after the first AVA dose (prior to the third AVA dose). Serum AVA derived anti-PA Ab concentrations were determined using an approved immunoassay. Per Protocol (PP) population was used in analysis which comprised of all analyzable participants (those who received at least the Week 0 [Day 1] and Week 2 [Day 15] AVA doses within the protocol specified visit window; receive the raxibacumab dose, if randomized to Treatment Group 2 and; completed the primary study endpoint assessment [anti-PA Ab concentration at Week 4]). (NCT02339155)
Timeframe: Day 29

InterventionMicrogram/milliliter (µg/mL) (Geometric Mean)
AVA Alone26.516
AVA+Raxibacumab22.477

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Indicated Time Points

Heart rate was measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest. Values at Day -1 were considered as Baseline values. Change from Baseline was defined as difference between the post-Baseline visit value and the Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points (represented by n=X in the category titles) were analyzed. (NCT02339155)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Day 183

,
InterventionBeats per minute (bpm) (Mean)
Day 1, n=286, 280Day 29, n=283, 279Day 57, n=282, 275Day 183, n=273, 266
AVA Alone-0.3-0.4-1.20.9
AVA+Raxibacumab-0.8-0.4-0.90.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Indicated Time Points

SBP and DBP were measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest. Values at Day -1 were considered as Baseline values. Change from Baseline was defined as difference between the post-Baseline visit value and the Baseline value. Only those participants available at the specified time points (represented by n=X in the category titles) were analyzed. (NCT02339155)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Day 183

,
InterventionMillimeter of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
SBP, Day 1, n=286, 280SBP, Day 29, n=283, 279SBP, Day 57, n=282, 275SBP, Day 183, n=273, 266DBP, Day 1, n=286, 280DBP, Day 29, n=283, 279DBP, Day 57, n=282, 275DBP, Day 183, n=273, 266
AVA Alone-3.40.61.82.4-2.71.01.92.3
AVA+Raxibacumab-3.81.92.21.5-3.11.62.32.5

[back to top]

Mean Percentage Change in Circulating Blood Levels of Cytokines 2 Hours Post-Dose

(NCT02363946)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 hours post-dose

,,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Serum interleukin-1 betaSerum interleukin-6Serum interleukin-8Serum interleukin-10Serum interleukin-12p40Serum interleukin-12p70Serum monocyte chemoattractant protein-1Serum macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alphaSerum tumor necrosis factor alphaSerum interferon alpha 2
Part A: 0.38 mg/kg0532-520123147660
Part A: 1.0 mg/kg07928072204422942070
Part A: 2.0 mg/kg09533651505053862860
Part A: 3.0 mg/kg05010342606322641870
Part A: 4.0 mg/kg0277171227054117616748180
Part A: 5.0 mg/kg01005641900129710964764
Part A: 6.0 mg/kg0146252116152054340630173
Part A: 7.0 mg/kg-9258695377-91669061003761172
Part A: 8.0 mg/kg9364201563829822014854742515
Part A: Placebo0-1-6-2-3-111535
Part B: 2.0 mg/kg-2601970-4-3262246107-3
Part B: 4.0 mg/kg114130460794844055700
Part B: Placebo056-44-5023-270-2969

[back to top]

Number of Participants With AAT Reduction > 30% From Baseline (First Occurrence)

Data presents the study visit day upon which a participant had the first occurrence of AAT reduction of > 30% from Baseline, and the number of participants who had a > 30% reduction at any visit (overall). Baseline AAT levels consisted of a geometric mean based on 3 assessments taken prior to study drug administration: at 2 time points during the Screening window at least 5 days apart, and on Day -1. (NCT02363946)
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 3, 8, 15, 22 and 29

,,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
OverallDay 3Day 8Day 15Day 22Day 29
Part A: 0.38 mg/kg000000
Part A: 1.0 mg/kg200002
Part A: 2.0 mg/kg200200
Part A: 3.0 mg/kg301200
Part A: 4.0 mg/kg404000
Part A: 5.0 mg/kg404000
Part A: 6.0 mg/kg413000
Part A: 7.0 mg/kg412001
Part A: 8.0 mg/kg321000
Part A: Placebo000000
Part B: 2.0 mg/kg202000
Part B: 4.0 mg/kg330000
Part B: Placebo101000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Treatment-Emergent Abnormalities in Laboratory Values

Laboratory values collected include: hematology (haemoglobin, lymphocytes, neutrophils, platelets, white cell count, monocytes); biochemistry (alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin, creatine kinase, creatinine, gamma-glutamyltransferase, fasting glucose, troponin I); coagulation parameters (fibrinogen, international normalized ratio); and C-reactive protein. (NCT02363946)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29 ± 1 day

,,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Troponin INeutrophilsCreatine KinaseWhite Cell CountMonocytesRed Cell Distribution Width
Part A: 0.38 mg/kg100000
Part A: 1.0 mg/kg000000
Part A: 2.0 mg/kg000000
Part A: 3.0 mg/kg000000
Part A: 4.0 mg/kg011000
Part A: 5.0 mg/kg000000
Part A: 6.0 mg/kg000000
Part A: 7.0 mg/kg000000
Part A: 8.0 mg/kg000000
Part A: Placebo000000
Part B: 2.0 mg/kg010111
Part B: 4.0 mg/kg000000
Part B: Placebo000000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Treatment-Emergent Abnormalities in Vital Signs, Electrocardiograms (ECGs), Pulmonary Function, Physical Findings, and Other Observations

Values collected include: vital signs (clinically concerning or symptomatic treatment emergent changes in heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, respiratory rate, or temperature); ECGs (clinically significant changes from baseline were observed for ventricular rate, RR interval, QRS duration, QT interval or QT interval corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula [QTcF]; treatment emergent clinically significant changes in ST segments, P wave or T wave morphology; cardiac telemetry monitoring); clinically significant abnormal physical examination findings; treatment emergent sensitivity to bee venom; pulmonary function (clinically significant worsening in spirometry parameters and carbon monoxide diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide [DLCO]). (NCT02363946)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Day 29 ± 1 day

,,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Vital SignsECGsPhysical Examination FindingsBee Venom SensitivityPulmonary Function
Part A: 0.38 mg/kg00000
Part A: 1.0 mg/kg00000
Part A: 2.0 mg/kg01000
Part A: 3.0 mg/kg00000
Part A: 4.0 mg/kg00000
Part A: 5.0 mg/kg00000
Part A: 6.0 mg/kg00000
Part A: 7.0 mg/kg00000
Part A: 8.0 mg/kg00000
Part A: Placebo00101
Part B: 2.0 mg/kg00000
Part B: 4.0 mg/kg00100
Part B: Placebo00000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), or Discontinuations Due to TEAEs

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs are defined as defined as AEs with onset after administration of the study drug, or when a preexisting medical condition increases in severity or frequency after study drug administration. SAEs are defined as is an AE that: results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; is a medically important event or reaction. (NCT02363946)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study treatment through Day 29 ± 1 day

,,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
TEAEsStudy Drug Related TEAEsMild or Moderate TEAEsSevere TEAEsStudy Drug Related Moderate TEAEsStudy Drug Related Severe TEAEsSAEsDiscontinuations Due to TEAEs
Part A: 0.38 mg/kg21201000
Part A: 1.0 mg/kg21200000
Part A: 2.0 mg/kg22201000
Part A: 3.0 mg/kg11101000
Part A: 4.0 mg/kg31300000
Part A: 5.0 mg/kg32300000
Part A: 6.0 mg/kg30300000
Part A: 7.0 mg/kg10100000
Part A: 8.0 mg/kg33303000
Part A: Placebo91810010
Part B: 2.0 mg/kg31300000
Part B: 4.0 mg/kg20200000
Part B: Placebo40400000

[back to top]

Percentage Reduction From Baseline of AAT Up to Day 29

Clinical assay for total serum AAT level was used for Part A. A quantitative measurement of AAT was used for Part B. A negative percent reduction indicates a percentage increase. Baseline AAT levels consisted of a geometric mean based on 3 assessments taken prior to study drug administration: at 2 time points during the Screening window at least 5 days apart, and on Day -1. (NCT02363946)
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 3, 8, 15, 22 and 29

,,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage reduction (Mean)
Day 3Day 8Day 15Day 22Day 29
Part A: 0.38 mg/kg-4.700.935.001.420.19
Part A: 1.0 mg/kg-7.0010.903.896.8125.87
Part A: 2.0 mg/kg-1.9413.4026.7215.5913.93
Part A: 3.0 mg/kg13.7633.2033.6535.5027.40
Part A: 4.0 mg/kg20.7646.9261.5358.6450.02
Part A: 5.0 mg/kg21.6558.5274.2077.1873.15
Part A: 6.0 mg/kg22.2058.4475.7583.1282.99
Part A: 7.0 mg/kg20.3550.9573.5781.1478.20
Part A: 8.0 mg/kg30.0758.6679.1887.4787.93
Part A: Placebo-4.65-0.260.780.50-1.56
Part B: 2.0 mg/kg11.543.137.525.121.0
Part B: 4.0 mg/kg43.854.477.759.565.2
Part B: Placebo-13.07.07.21.7-7.2

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics of ARC-AAT: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From From Zero to Infinity (AUCinf) for the Analytes AD00370 and ARC-MLP (Part A)

(NCT02363946)
Timeframe: Day 1, 2, and 3 at pre-dose and then at 0.08, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 24 and 48 hours post-dose

,,,,,,,,
Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Analyte AD00370Analyte ARC-MLP
Part A: 0.38 mg/kg2738834718
Part A: 1.0 mg/kg85906103116
Part A: 2.0 mg/kg164856277684
Part A: 3.0 mg/kg285487380506
Part A: 4.0 mg/kg441239559372
Part A: 5.0 mg/kg547045569056
Part A: 6.0 mg/kg719843872798
Part A: 7.0 mg/kg771924952668
Part A: 8.0 mg/kg9163431251318

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics of ARC-AAT: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to Time 24 Hours (AUC0-24) for the Analytes AD00370 and ARC-MLP (Part A)

(NCT02363946)
Timeframe: Day 1, 2, and 3 at pre-dose and then at 0.08, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 24 and 48 hours post-dose

,,,,,,,,
Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Analyte AD00370Analyte ARC-MLP
Part A: 0.38 mg/kg2690528734
Part A: 1.0 mg/kg8513882627
Part A: 2.0 mg/kg162198213250
Part A: 3.0 mg/kg282710291876
Part A: 4.0 mg/kg438532458790
Part A: 5.0 mg/kg541628459939
Part A: 6.0 mg/kg708648699833
Part A: 7.0 mg/kg763392716938
Part A: 8.0 mg/kg9081171011569

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Return From Nadir AAT Blood Levels to Above Normal or Within 15% of Baseline in > 100 Days

Baseline AAT levels consisted of a geometric mean based on 3 assessments taken prior to study drug administration: at 2 time points during the Screening window at least 5 days apart, and on Day -1. (NCT02363946)
Timeframe: Baseline, up to Day 29, and through 100 days of follow-up

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Part A: 0.38 mg/kg4
Part A: 1.0 mg/kg4
Part A: 2.0 mg/kg4
Part A: 3.0 mg/kg4
Part A: 4.0 mg/kg4
Part A: 5.0 mg/kg4
Part A: 6.0 mg/kg4
Part A: 7.0 mg/kg4
Part A: 8.0 mg/kg4
Part A: Placebo18
Part B: 2.0 mg/kg4
Part B: 4.0 mg/kg3
Part B: Placebo4

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics of ARC-AAT: Half-Life (t1/2) for the Analytes AD00370 and ARC-MLP (Part A)

(NCT02363946)
Timeframe: Day 1, 2, and 3 at pre-dose and then at 0.08, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 24 and 48 hours post-dose

,,,,,,,,
Interventionhours (Mean)
Analyte AD00370Analyte ARC-MLP
Part A: 0.38 mg/kg3.909.02
Part A: 1.0 mg/kg3.918.60
Part A: 2.0 mg/kg4.099.77
Part A: 3.0 mg/kg3.999.83
Part A: 4.0 mg/kg3.758.43
Part A: 5.0 mg/kg3.788.93
Part A: 6.0 mg/kg3.809.17
Part A: 7.0 mg/kg3.9011.3
Part A: 8.0 mg/kg3.839.52

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics of ARC-AAT: Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) for the Analytes AD00370 and ARC-MLP (Part A)

(NCT02363946)
Timeframe: Day 1, 2, and 3 at pre-dose and then at 0.08, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 24 and 48 hours post-dose

,,,,,,,,
Interventionhour (Median)
Analyte AD00370Analyte ARC-MLP
Part A: 0.38 mg/kg0.0830.083
Part A: 1.0 mg/kg0.0830.083
Part A: 2.0 mg/kg0.0830.083
Part A: 3.0 mg/kg0.0830.083
Part A: 4.0 mg/kg0.0830.083
Part A: 5.0 mg/kg0.0830.083
Part A: 6.0 mg/kg0.0830.083
Part A: 7.0 mg/kg0.0830.50
Part A: 8.0 mg/kg0.500.50

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics of ARC-AAT: Terminal Elimination Rate Constant Obtained From the Slope of the Line (Kel) for the Analytes AD00370 and ARC-MLP (Part A)

(NCT02363946)
Timeframe: Day 1, 2, and 3 at pre-dose and then at 0.08, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 24 and 48 hours post-dose

,,,,,,,,
Intervention1/hour (Mean)
Analyte AD00370Analyte ARC-MLP
Part A: 0.38 mg/kg0.1860.0786
Part A: 1.0 mg/kg0.1770.0879
Part A: 2.0 mg/kg0.1700.0778
Part A: 3.0 mg/kg0.1740.0762
Part A: 4.0 mg/kg0.1850.0846
Part A: 5.0 mg/kg0.1830.0815
Part A: 6.0 mg/kg0.1850.0768
Part A: 7.0 mg/kg0.1780.0622
Part A: 8.0 mg/kg0.1810.0730

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics of ARC-AAT: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for the Analytes AD00370 and ARC-Melittin-Like Peptide (MLP; Part A)

(NCT02363946)
Timeframe: Day 1, 2, and 3 at pre-dose and then at 0.08, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 24 and 48 hours post-dose

,,,,,,,,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Analyte AD00370Analyte ARC-MLP
Part A: 0.38 mg/kg44302760
Part A: 1.0 mg/kg155009350
Part A: 2.0 mg/kg3240020700
Part A: 3.0 mg/kg5065027050
Part A: 4.0 mg/kg7562543425
Part A: 5.0 mg/kg9327548975
Part A: 6.0 mg/kg11575070050
Part A: 7.0 mg/kg13025062525
Part A: 8.0 mg/kg16700084733

[back to top]

Mean Percentage Change in Circulating Blood Levels of Complement Factors 2 Hours Post-Dose

(NCT02363946)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2 hours post-dose

,,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Plasma BbSerum C3aSerum C4aSerum C5aSerum CH50
Part A: 0.38 mg/kg18-12-52-5
Part A: 1.0 mg/kg5630372-14
Part A: 2.0 mg/kg76-22-11-16-14
Part A: 3.0 mg/kg133-02-2-8
Part A: 4.0 mg/kg1817116-14-16
Part A: 5.0 mg/kg137-5-82-17
Part A: 6.0 mg/kg7014780-10
Part A: 7.0 mg/kg14740606-13
Part A: 8.0 mg/kg30934-16-19
Part A: Placebo-7-11-19-2-3
Part B: 2.0 mg/kg56-18-35-4-3
Part B: 4.0 mg/kg5921916022-18
Part B: Placebo-1416-15-4-0

[back to top]

Maximum Percentage Reduction in Mean AAT (Nadir of Mean AAT)

(NCT02363946)
Timeframe: Study Day for Nadir of Mean AAT: Day 8 (for Part B 2 mg/kg arm), Day 15 (for Part A 0.38 mg/kg, 2 mg/kg, 4 mg/ kg, Placebo arms; Part B 4 mg/kg, Placebo arms), Day 22 (Part A 3 mg/kg, 5 mg/kg, 6 mg/kg, 7 mg/kg arms), Day 29 (1 mg/kg, 8 mg/kg arms)

Interventionpercentage reduction (Number)
Part A: 0.38 mg/kg5.0
Part A: 1.0 mg/kg25.9
Part A: 2.0 mg/kg26.7
Part A: 3.0 mg/kg35.5
Part A: 4.0 mg/kg61.5
Part A: 5.0 mg/kg77.2
Part A: 6.0 mg/kg83.1
Part A: 7.0 mg/kg81.1
Part A: 8.0 mg/kg87.9
Part A: Placebo0.78
Part B: 2.0 mg/kg43.1
Part B: 4.0 mg/kg77.7
Part B: Placebo7.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Achieved Short Term Headache Relief, Assessed by Telphone Questionnaire

"Participants were asked to make evaluation of pain status since discharge. Those achieving headache level mild or none for 1 hour are considered to achieve short term headache relief." (NCT02389829)
Timeframe: 48 hours after discharge from Emergency Department

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Hydromorphone33
Prochlorperazine53

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Sustained Headache Relief Assessed by Self-evaluation

"Sustained headache relief is defined as achieving a headache level of mild or none within two hours and maintaining a level of mild or none for 48 hours, without use of addition medication. Patient self-evaluated pain level is solicited every half hour for two hours in the Emergency Department and then by telephone 48 hours after medication administration." (NCT02389829)
Timeframe: up to 2 hours in Emergency Department, 48 hours after discharge from Emergency Department

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Hydromorphone20
Prochlorperazine37

[back to top]

Number of Participants Needing Rescue Medication as Assessed by Questionnaire

Data collected by telephone. Patients were asked if they needed additional medication after discharge in order to reduce level of pain. This additional medication is considered rescue medication. (NCT02389829)
Timeframe: 48 hours after discharge from Emergency Department

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Hydromorphone23
Prochlorperazine4

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Achieved Short Term Headache Freedom; Assessed by Telephone Questionnaire

Participants were asked to evaluate pain status since discharge. Participants who achieved total headache freedom for at least 1 hour are considered to achieve short term headache relief. (NCT02389829)
Timeframe: 48 hours after discharge from Emergency Department

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Hydromorphone16
Prochlorperazine29

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths, and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with treatment. An SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or is a medically important event or reaction. An AE was classified as a TEAE if the AE was not present prior to the first study medication administration and started at or after the time of initiation of administration of study medication, or if the AE presented prior to initiation of administration of study medication, continued and increased in intensity after administration of study medication. (NCT02452528)
Timeframe: From time of informed consent through Day 147 ± 3 days

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TEAEsSAEsDeathsDiscontinuations due to AEs
ARC-5200000
Placebo1000

[back to top]

Proportion of Liver Transplant Recipients Who Are Able to Reduce Calcineurin Inhibitor Dosing by 75 Percent and Discontinue a Second Immunosuppression Drug (if Applicable) With Stable Liver Function Tests (LFTs) for ≥ 12 Weeks

The ability to reduce baseline, standard of care calcineurin inhibitor dosing following transplantation was measured by determining the number of subjects who were able to tolerate a 75 percent reduction in their calcineurin inhibitors along with discontinuation of either prednisone or mycophenolate mofetil following initiation of immunosuppression withdrawal. (NCT02474199)
Timeframe: From initiation of immunosuppression withdrawal to 24 weeks after darTregs infusion

InterventionProportion of Participants (Number)
Initiated Immunosuppression Withdrawal0.20

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Efficacy Status Post Receipt of a Single Intravenous (IV) Dose of Donor Alloantigen Reactive Regulatory T Cells (darTregs)

Efficacy was assessed by determining the number (and percentage) of participants who have received darTreg infusion and are identified as operationally tolerant, defined by maintaining stable allograft function (assessed by liver tests) and histology (determined by central pathologist reading in comparison to screening liver biopsy at study entry) in the absence of immunosuppression for one year. (NCT02474199)
Timeframe: From initiation of immunosuppression withdrawal to 52 weeks after darTreg infusion

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Initiated Immunosuppression Withdrawal, Received darTregs0

[back to top]

Number of Liver Transplant Recipients Who Experience the Composite Outcome

This measure includes refractory acute rejection, chronic rejection, re-transplantation, and death. Rejection was diagnosed based on local pathology. Participants are considered to have met this endpoint if they experience any one of these events at least once. (NCT02474199)
Timeframe: From initiation of immunosuppression withdrawal to 52 weeks after darTreg infusion

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Initiated Immunosuppression Withdrawal0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experience at Least One Episode of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection, Clinical Acute Rejection, or Chronic Rejection

"A participant was considered to have met this endpoint if they experienced at least one episode of biopsy proven acute rejection, clinical acute rejection, or chronic rejection based on local pathology.~Biopsy proven acute rejection was assessed as Grade I or higher based on the Banff (1997) global criteria featuring the following grades:~Indeterminate~Grade I Mild Acute Rejection~Grade II Moderate Acute Rejection~Grade III Severe Acute Rejection.~Clinical AR was determined based on the participant receiving treatment for rejection with or without biopsy confirmation of rejection.~Chronic rejection was determined by the presence of abnormal total and direct bilirubin in the conjunction with liver pathology fulfilling the Banff (2000) criteria as outlined:~Early Stage Chronic Rejection~Late Stage Chronic Rejection." (NCT02474199)
Timeframe: From initiation of immunosuppression withdrawal to 52 weeks after darTreg infusion

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Initiated Immunosuppression Withdrawal5

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) Deemed Attributable to darTreg Infusion

The National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was used to grade the severity of all AEs. A participant was considered to have met this endpoint if they experienced at least one CTCAE Grade 3 or higher AE deemed attributable (i.e., considered at least possibly related) to darTreg infusion (infusion reaction, cytokine release syndrome). (NCT02474199)
Timeframe: From initiation of immunosuppression withdrawal to 24 weeks after darTregs infusion

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Initiated Immunosuppression Withdrawal, Received darTregs0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Any Malignancy

Number of participants with any malignancy, including Post -Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD). PTLD is a specific type of malignancy that can occur following transplantation of a solid organ and is characterized by a proliferation of B cells, which may result in lymphoma. (NCT02474199)
Timeframe: From initiation of immunosuppression withdrawal to 24 weeks after darTregs infusion

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Initiated Immunosuppression Withdrawal0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Study Defined Grade 3 or Higher Infections

"The following grading system was applied to AEs of infection:~Grade 1: asymptomatic; clinical or diagnostic observation only; intervention with oral antibiotic, antifungal, or antiviral agent only; no invasive intervention required~Grade 2: symptomatic; intervention with intravenous antibiotic, antifungal, or antiviral agent; invasive intervention may be required~Grade 3: any infection associated with hemodynamic compromise requiring pressors; any infection necessitating intensive care unit level of care; any infection necessitating operative intervention; any infection involving the central nervous system; any infection with a positive fungal blood culture; any proven or probable aspergillus infection; any tissue invasive fungal infection; any pneumocystis jiroveci infection~Grade 4: life-threatening infection~Grade 5: death resulting from infection~A participant was considered to have met this endpoint if they experienced at least one Grade 3 or higher infection." (NCT02474199)
Timeframe: From initiation of immunosuppression withdrawal to 24 weeks after darTregs infusion

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Initiated Immunosuppression Withdrawal0

[back to top]

Count of Participants by Severity of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection and/or Chronic Rejection

"Participants are counted in each grade of rejection they experienced; however, a participant is only counted once within a specific grade. Biopsy proven acute rejection and Chronic rejection were graded based on local pathology according to the Banff (1997 for Acute Rejection; 2000 for Chronic Rejection) global assessment criteria as outlined below.~Biopsy proven acute rejection was assessed as Grade I or higher using the following grades:~Indeterminate~Grade I Mild Acute Rejection~Grade II Moderate Acute Rejection~Grade III Severe Acute Rejection.~Chronic rejection was determined by the presence of abnormal total and direct bilirubin in the conjunction with liver pathology fulfilling the Banff criteria as outlined:~Early Stage Chronic Rejection~Late Stage Chronic Rejection." (NCT02474199)
Timeframe: From initiation of immunosuppression withdrawal to 52 weeks after darTregs infusion

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Mild Acute RejectionModerate Acute RejectionSevere Acute RejectionEarly Stage Chronic RejectionLate Stage Chronic Rejection
Initiated Immunosuppression Withdrawal20000

[back to top]

Change in eGFR Between Post-transplant Nadir and 24 Months as Measured by CKD-EPI

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. Post-transplant nadir was defined as the lowest value of eGFR from the first 6 months post-transplant. The change in eGFR between nadir and month 24 was calculated as the month 24 eGFR minus the nadir eGFR for each participant. A window of +/- 21 days was used for month 6 and +/- 1 month was used for month 24. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 6 months and 24 months post-transplantation

InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Experimental8.5
Control12.0

[back to top]

Change in eGFR Between Post-transplant Nadir and 24 Months as Measured by MDRD

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. Post-transplant nadir was defined as the lowest value of eGFR from the first 6 months post-transplant. The change in eGFR between nadir and month 24 was calculated as the month 24 eGFR minus the nadir eGFR for each participant. A window of +/- 21 days was used for month 6 and +/- 1 month was used for month 24. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 6 months and 24 months post-transplantation

InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Experimental8.1
Control11.6

[back to top]

Creatinine Reduction Ratio (CRR), Defined as the First Creatinine on Day 2 Divided by he First Creatinine After Surgery

Serum creatinine (mg/dL) is used to measure kidney function. A normal result is 0.7 to 1.3 mg/dL for men and 0.6 to 1.1 mg/dL for women. Higher results indicate poorer kidney function, as creatinine is removed from the body by the kidneys. CRR was calculated as the day 1 post-transplant creatinine value minus the day 2 creatinine value divided by the day 1 creatinine value and multiplied by 100, resulting in a percentage. Higher numbers indicate a greater reduction in serum creatinine and, thus, potentially better kidney function. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: Day 2 post-transplantation

InterventionPercentage (Mean)
Experimental24.28
Control20.97

[back to top]

Creatinine Reduction Ratio (CRR), Defined as the First Creatinine on Day 5 Divided by the First Creatinine After Surgery.

Serum creatinine (mg/dL) is used to measure kidney function. A normal result is 0.7 to 1.3 mg/dL for men and 0.6 to 1.1 mg/dL for women. Higher results indicate poorer kidney function, as creatinine is removed from the body by the kidneys. CRR was calculated as the day 1 post-transplant creatinine value minus the day 5 creatinine value divided by the day 1 creatinine value and multiplied by 100, resulting in a percentage. Higher numbers indicate a greater reduction in serum creatinine and, thus, potentially better kidney function. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: Day 5 post-transplantation

InterventionPercentage (Mean)
Experimental47.06
Control43.37

[back to top]

Days From Transplantation Until Event (ACR, AMR, or Hospitalization for Infection and/or Malignancy)

Participants are considered to have met this endpoint if they experienced biopsy-proven T-cell mediated rejection (ACR) or antibody mediated rejection (AMR) based on central pathology reading or were hospitalized for infection and/or malignancy. For participants who met one or more of these three components, the earliest event date of the three components was used as the time of meeting the endpoint. Participants who did not meet any of the three components were censored at their last date of follow-up. Event (or censor) day was calculated as event (or censor) date minus transplant date. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

InterventionDays to event (Median)
Experimental642
Control613

[back to top]

Duration of Delayed Graft Function (DGF), Defined as Time From Transplantation to the Last Required Dialysis Treatment.

Participants are considered to have had DGF if they had at least one dialysis treatment in the first week post-transplant. For this endpoint, duration was calculated as the date of last post-transplant dialysis treatment minus the date of the first post-transplant dialysis treatment. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: First post-transplant dialysis treatment to last post-transplant dialysis treatment

InterventionDays (Mean)
Experimental13.27
Control15.74

[back to top]

eGFR Values as Measured by CKD-EPI

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. eGFR values from day 7 and months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 were used to generate an estimate of the eGFR at each time point of interest for each treatment group. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: Day 7 post-transplantation

InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Experimental41.01
Control41.85

[back to top]

eGFR Values as Measured by MDRD

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. eGFR values from day 7 and months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 were used to generate an estimate of the eGFR at each time point of interest for each treatment group. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: Day 7 post-transplantation

InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Experimental38.93
Control39.96

[back to top]

Number of Dialysis Sessions.

The number of dialysis sessions a person had during their first 8 weeks post-transplant was used for this endpoint. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 8 weeks post-transplantation

InterventionDialysis sessions (Mean)
Experimental0.14
Control0.26

[back to top]

Percent of Participants That Required at Least One Dialysis Treatment.

Dialysis within the first week post-transplant is used in the setting of delayed graft function (DGF). Participants are considered to have had DGF if they had at least one dialysis treatment in the first week post-transplant. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 1 week post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental31.0
Control35.7

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Any Infection Requiring Hospitalization or Resulting in Death.

Participants were considered to have met this endpoint if they had an infection that required hospitalization or resulted in death. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental43.0
Control39.3

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With BANFF Chronicity Scores > or Equal 2 on the 24 Month Biopsy.

The Banff 2013 classification involves scoring numerous characteristics of renal biopsy specimens. The ci (interstitial fibrosis) and ct (tubular atrophy) scores are two such characteristics. The scores can take values of 0, 1, 2, or 3 for each characteristic (ci and ct), indicating increasing severity of disease as the scores increase. Participants are considered to have met this endpoint if their ci + ct score on the 24 month biopsy summed to be > or equal to 2. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental73.1
Control36.4

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection (AMR)

Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2013 criteria. Participants with a Banff finding of AMR within 6 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. AMR is classified as acute/active, chronic/active, or C4d staining positive.Criteria include: acute/active-histologic evidence of acute tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs); chronic/active-morphologic evidence of chronic tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of DSAs; C4d staining positive-linear C4d staining in peritubular capillaries, glomerulitis=0, peritubular capillary=0, chronic glomerulopathy=0, no acute cell-mediated rejection or borderline changes. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 6 months post-transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Experimental0.0
Control0.0

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection (AMR).

Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2013 criteria. Participants with a Banff finding of AMR within 24 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. AMR is classified as acute/active, chronic/active, or C4d staining positive. Criteria include: acute/active-histologic evidence of acute tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs); chronic/active-morphologic evidence of chronic tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of DSAs; C4d staining positive-linear C4d staining in peritubular capillaries, glomerulitis=0, peritubular capillary=0, chronic glomerulopathy=0, no acute cell-mediated rejection or borderline changes. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participant (Number)
Experimental1.3
Control0.0

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection AMR or Suspicious for AMR

Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2013 criteria. Participants with a Banff finding of AMR or suspicious for AMR within 6 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. AMR is classified as acute/active, chronic/active, C4d staining positive, or suspicious. Criteria include: acute/active-histologic evidence of acute tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs); chronic/active-morphologic evidence of chronic tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of DSAs; C4d staining positive-linear C4d staining in peritubular capillaries, glomerulitis=0, peritubular capillary=0, chronic glomerulopathy=0, no acute cell-mediated rejection or borderline changes; suspicious-when 2 of 3 factors for acute/active are present. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 6 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental2.8
Control0.0

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Antibody Mediated Rejection AMR or Suspicious for AMR.

Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2013 criteria. Participants with a Banff finding of AMR or suspicious for AMR within 24 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. AMR is classified as acute/active, chronic/active, C4d staining positive, or suspicious. Criteria include: acute/active-histologic evidence of acute tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs); chronic/active-morphologic evidence of chronic tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of DSAs; C4d staining positive-linear C4d staining in peritubular capillaries, glomerulitis=0, peritubular capillary=0, chronic glomerulopathy=0, no acute cell-mediated rejection or borderline changes; suspicious-when 2 of 3 factors for acute/active are present (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental3.8
Control1.4

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Cellular Rejection (BPAR)

Acute cellular rejection was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2007 criteria. Participants with a Banff grade of greater than or equal to IA with or without clinical symptoms within 6 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. Severity is graded as IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III, with IA being the mildest form of cellular rejection and III being the most severe form of cellular rejection.Criteria include: IA-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate tubulitis; IB-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of severe tubulitis; IIA-mild to moderate intimal arteritis; IIB-severe intimal arteritis; III-transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 6 month post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental4.2
Control3.0

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Cellular Rejection (BPAR) or Borderline Rejection

Acute cellular rejection was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2007 criteria. Participants with a Banff grade of borderline or greater than or equal to IA with or without clinical symptoms within 24 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. Severity is graded as Borderline, IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III, with borderline representing possible cellular rejection, IA being the mildest form of cellular rejection, and III being the most severe form of cellular rejection. Criteria include: Borderline-no intimal arteritis is present but foci of mild tubulitis; IA-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate tubulitis; IB-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of severe tubulitis; IIA-mild to moderate intimal arteritis; IIB-severe intimal arteritis; III-transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental12.8
Control7

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Cellular Rejection (BPAR) or Borderline Rejection.

Acute cellular rejection was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2007 criteria. Participants with a Banff grade of borderline or greater than or equal to IA with or without clinical symptoms within 6 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. Severity is graded as Borderline, IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III, with borderline representing possible cellular rejection, IA being the mildest form of cellular rejection, and III being the most severe form of cellular rejection.Criteria include: Borderline-no intimal arteritis is present but foci of mild tubulitis; IA-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate tubulitis; IB-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of severe tubulitis; IIA-mild to moderate intimal arteritis; IIB-severe intimal arteritis; III-transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 6 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental8.5
Control6.1

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Cellular Rejection (BPAR).

Acute cellular rejection was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2007 criteria. Participants with a Banff grade of greater than or equal to IA with or without clinical symptoms within 24 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. Severity is graded as IA, IB, IIA, IIB, or III, with IA being the mildest form of cellular rejection and III being the most severe form of cellular rejection. Criteria include: IA-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of moderate tubulitis; IB-significant interstitial infiltration and foci of severe tubulitis; IIA-mild to moderate intimal arteritis; IIB-severe intimal arteritis; III-transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental5.1
Control4.2

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With BK Viremia That Require a Change in Immunosuppression or Anti-viral Treatment as Per Standard of Care at the Site.

Participants were considered to have met this endpoint if they had a reported case of BK viremia that required a change in their existing immunosuppression or the use of anti-viral therapy. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Experimental28.9
Control13.4

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With CMV Viremia That Require a Change in Immunosuppression or Anti-viral Treatment as Per Standard of Care at the Site

Participants were considered to have met this endpoint if they had a reported case of CMV viremia that required a change in their existing immunosuppression or the use of anti-viral therapy. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental18.4
Control11.6

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With de Novo DSA.

Donor specific antibody (DSA) can be formed post-transplant as part of the recipient's alloimmune response to the transplanted organ. DSA was determined by a central laboratory. Participants with newly developed DSA (i.e., de novo) following transplant were considered to have met this endpoint. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental8.0
Control3.6

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Death or Graft Failure.

Participants who died or experienced graft failure were considered to have met this endpoint. Graft failure was defined as the need for post-transplant dialysis for more than 56 days. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental5.3
Control7.1

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Impaired Wound Healing Manifested by Wound Dehiscence, Wound Infection, or Hernia at the Site of the Transplant Incision

Participants were considered to have met this endpoint if they had a reported case of impaired wound healing at the site of the transplant incision manifested by one wound dehiscence, wound infection, or hernia. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Experimental7.9
Control11.6

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Locally Treated Rejection, Defined as Treatment Administered for Rejection Based on Clinical Signs or Biopsy Findings.

Biopsies were read by the local pathologist at the hospital where the participant was a patient. These local reads informed clinical care for the participant, which may or may not include prescribing/administering medication to the participant to help with clinical concerns or findings noted on a biopsy. Participants were considered to have met this endpoint if they have a report of receiving treatment for clinical or biopsy-proven rejection during the 24 month post-transplant follow-up. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental16.2
Control27

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Locally Treated Rejection, Defined as Treatment Administered for Rejection Based on Clinical Signs or Biopsy Findings.

Biopsies were read by the local pathologist at the hospital where the participant was a patient. These local reads informed clinical care for the participant, which may or may not include prescribing/administering medication to the participant to help with clinical concerns or findings noted on a biopsy. Participants were considered to have met this endpoint if they have a report of receiving treatment for clinical or biopsy-proven rejection during the first 6 months post-transplant. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 6 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental12.6
Control20.5

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Malignancy.

Participants were considered to have met this endpoint if they had a reported case of malignancy. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
Experimental1.8
Control0.9

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Mycobacterial or Fungal Infections

Participants were considered to have met this endpoint if they had at least one mycobacterial of fungal infection. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental6.1
Control6.3

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Only Graft Failure.

Participants who experienced graft failure were considered to have met this endpoint. Graft failure was defined as the need for post-transplant dialysis for more than 56 days. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental2.7
Control2.7

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Primary Non-Function (PNF), Defined as Dialysis-dependency for More Than 3 Months.

Post-transplant dialysis is sometimes required in the setting of kidney transplant. If such dialysis continues for more than 3 months, the participant is considered to have PNF and, as such, meets this endpoint definition. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: Transplantation through at least month 3 up to month 24

InterventionPercent of Participants (Number)
Experimental2.8
Control0.9

[back to top]

The Difference Between the Mean eGFR (Modified MDRD) in the Experimental vs. Control Groups.

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. eGFR values from months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 were used to generate an estimate of the month 24 eGFR for each treatment group. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24-Month post-transplantation

InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Experimental52.45
Control57.35

[back to top]

The Percent of Participants Who Need Dialysis After Week 1.

Participants who needed dialysis after the first week post-transplant were considered to have met this endpoint. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 1 week to 24 months post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental9.0
Control2.8

[back to top]

The Percent of Participants Whose Day 2 Serum CRR Was Less Than 30%.

Serum creatinine (mg/dL) is used to measure kidney function. A normal result is 0.7 to 1.3 mg/dL for men and 0.6 to 1.1 mg/dL for women. Higher results indicate poorer kidney function, as creatinine is removed from the body by the kidneys. CRR was calculated as the day 1 post-transplant creatinine value minus the day 2 creatinine value divided by the day 1 creatinine value and multiplied by 100, resulting in a percentage. Higher numbers indicate a greater reduction in serum creatinine and, thus, potentially better kidney function. A participant was considered to have met this endpoint if their day 2 serum CRR was less than 30%. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: Day 2 post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental57.1
Control68.6

[back to top]

The Percent of Participants Whose Day 5 Serum CRR Was Less Than 70%.

Serum creatinine (mg/dL) is used to measure kidney function. A normal result is 0.7 to 1.3 mg/dL for men and 0.6 to 1.1 mg/dL for women. Higher results indicate poorer kidney function, as creatinine is removed from the body by the kidneys. CRR was calculated as the day 1 post-transplant creatinine value minus the day 5 creatinine value divided by the day 1 creatinine value and multiplied by 100, resulting in a percentage. Higher numbers indicate a greater reduction in serum creatinine and, thus, potentially better kidney function. A participant was considered to have met this endpoint if their day 5 serum CRR was less than 70%. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: Day 5 post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental74.4
Control88.4

[back to top]

The Percent of Participants With a Serum Creatinine of More Than 3 mg/dL.

Serum creatinine (mg/dL) is used to measure kidney function. A normal result is 0.7 to 1.3 mg/dL for men and 0.6 to 1.1 mg/dL for women. Higher results indicate poorer kidney function, as creatinine is removed from the body by the kidneys. This endpoint is ascertaining slow graft function in the immediate days post-transplant. A participant was considered to have met this endpoint if their day 5 serum creatinine was greater than 3 mg/dL. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: Day 5 post-transplantation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental47.4
Control42.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Immediately After Surgery) in Serum Creatinine.

Serum creatinine (mg/dL) is used to measure kidney function. A normal result is 0.7 to 1.3 mg/dL for men and 0.6 to 1.1 mg/dL for women. Higher results indicate poorer kidney function, as creatinine is removed from the body by the kidneys. eGFR values from 24, 48, and 72 hours post-transplant (i.e., days 1, 2, and 3) were used to generate an estimate of the serum creatinine at each time point of interest for each treatment group. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 24, 48 and 72 hours post-transplantation

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
24 Hours48 Hours72 Hours
Control6.855.875.21
Experimental7.356.245.77

[back to top]

eGFR Values as Measured by CKD-EPI

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. eGFR values from day 7 and months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 were used to generate an estimate of the eGFR at each time point of interest for each treatment group. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: Days 30, 90, and 180 post-transplantation

,
InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Day 30Day 90Day 180
Control50.6351.4452.65
Experimental49.2949.8050.56

[back to top]

eGFR Values as Measured by MDRD

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. eGFR values from day 7 and months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 were used to generate an estimate of the eGFR at each time point of interest for each treatment group. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: Days 30, 60, and 180 post-transplantation

,
InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Day 30Day 90Day 180
Control48.2048.9950.16
Experimental46.6447.1447.89

[back to top]

BANFF Grades of First AMR.

Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) was defined based on central lab pathology interpretation using the Banff 2013 criteria. Participants with a Banff finding of AMR within 6 months of transplant were determined to have met the endpoint. AMR is classified as acute/active, chronic/active, or C4d staining positive. Criteria include: acute/active-histologic evidence of acute tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs); chronic/active-morphologic evidence of chronic tissue injury, evidence of current/recent antibody interaction with vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of DSAs; C4d staining positive-linear C4d staining in peritubular capillaries, glomerulitis=0, peritubular capillary=0, chronic glomerulopathy=0, no acute cell-mediated rejection or borderline changes. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 6 months post-transplantation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Experimental0
Control0

[back to top]

Change in eGFR Between 3 Months and 24 Months as Measured by CKD-EPI

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. The change in eGFR between months 3 and 24 was calculated as the month 24 eGFR minus the month 3 eGFR for each participant. A window of +/- 14 days was used for month 3 and +/- 1 month was used for month 24. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 3 months and 24 months post-transplantation

InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Experimental2.7
Control4.4

[back to top]

Change in eGFR Between 3 Months and 24 Months as Measured by MDRD

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. The change in eGFR between months 3 and 24 was calculated as the month 24 eGFR minus the month 3 eGFR for each participant. A window of +/- 14 days was used for month 3 and +/- 1 month was used for month 24. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 3 months and 24 months post-transplantation

InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Experimental2.8
Control4.8

[back to top]

Change in eGFR Between 6 Months and 24 Months as Measured by CKD-EPI

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. The change in eGFR between months 6 and 24 was calculated as the month 24 eGFR minus the month 6 eGFR for each participant. A window of +/- 21 days was used for month 6 and +/- 1 month was used for month 24. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 6 months and 24 months post-transplantation

InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Experimental0.8
Control4.8

[back to top]

Change in eGFR Between 6 Months and 24 Months as Measured by MDRD

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a measure of kidney function and helps determine the stage of kidney disease. eGFR was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. A value of 90+ means kidney function is normal. A value between 60 and 89 indicates mildly reduced kidney function, pointing to kidney disease. Values between 30 and 59 indicates moderately reduced kidney function. Values between 15 and 29 indicate severely reduced kidney function. Values below 15 indicate very severe or endstage kidney failure. The change in eGFR between months 6 and 24 was calculated as the month 24 eGFR minus the month 6 eGFR for each participant. A window of +/- 21 days was used for month 6 and +/- 1 month was used for month 24. (NCT02495077)
Timeframe: 6 months and 24 months post-transplantation

InterventionmL/min/1.73m2 (Mean)
Experimental1.0
Control5.2

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Half-Life (t1/2) of the Analytes of ARC-520

Analytes include AD0009 and AD0010 (cholesterol-conjugated siRNA targeting HBV) and MLP. (NCT02535416)
Timeframe: Day 1 pre-dose through 48 hours post-dose

,,,
Interventionhour (Mean)
Analyte AD0009Analyte AD0010Analyte MLP
ARC-520 Cohort 34.104.6810.41
ARC-520 Cohort 64.025.3110.44
ARC-520 Cohort 74.065.0711.94
ARC-520 Cohort 84.566.1712.24

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Clearance (CL) of the Analytes of ARC-520

Analytes include AD0009 and AD0010 (cholesterol-conjugated siRNA targeting HBV) and MLP. (NCT02535416)
Timeframe: Day 1 pre-dose through 48 hours post-dose

,,,
InterventionmL/hr/kg (Mean)
Analyte AD0009Analyte AD0010Analyte MLP
ARC-520 Cohort 312.019.923.80
ARC-520 Cohort 612.049.613.85
ARC-520 Cohort 712.4011.133.73
ARC-520 Cohort 89.688.723.27

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Last Quantifiable Plasma Concentration (AUClast) of the Analytes of ARC-520

Analytes include AD0009 and AD0010 (cholesterol-conjugated siRNA targeting HBV) and MLP. (NCT02535416)
Timeframe: Day 1 pre-dose through 48 hours post-dose

,,,
Interventionng.hr/mL (Mean)
Analyte AD0009Analyte AD0010Analyte MLP
ARC-520 Cohort 33616114336321022752
ARC-520 Cohort 63404304229641021005
ARC-520 Cohort 74169054616011270330
ARC-520 Cohort 86382036985671722485

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Zero to 24 Hours (AUC0-24) of the Analytes of ARC-520

Analytes include AD0009 and AD0010 (cholesterol-conjugated siRNA targeting hepatitis B virus [HBV]) and melittin-like peptide (MLP). (NCT02535416)
Timeframe: Day 1 pre-dose through 48 hours post-dose

,,,
Interventionng.hr/mL (Mean)
Analyte AD0009Analyte AD0010Analyte MLP
ARC-520 Cohort 3350027411580839718
ARC-520 Cohort 6331953393161832929
ARC-520 Cohort 74032474319801015503
ARC-520 Cohort 86056086307741364108

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUCinf) of the Analytes of ARC-520

Analytes include AD0009 and AD0010 (cholesterol-conjugated siRNA targeting HBV) and MLP. (NCT02535416)
Timeframe: Day 1 pre-dose through 48 hours post-dose

,,,
Interventionng.hr/mL (Mean)
Analyte AD0009Analyte AD0010Analyte MLP
ARC-520 Cohort 33618204343511068557
ARC-520 Cohort 63405914255981080995
ARC-520 Cohort 74171534628371368448
ARC-520 Cohort 86389657038861869597

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Apparent Volume of Distribution (V) of the Analytes of ARC-520

Analytes include AD0009 and AD0010 (cholesterol-conjugated siRNA targeting HBV) and MLP. (NCT02535416)
Timeframe: Day 1 pre-dose through 48 hours post-dose

,,,
InterventionmL/kg (Mean)
Analyte AD0009Analyte AD0010Analyte MLP
ARC-520 Cohort 370.0265.9858.03
ARC-520 Cohort 669.3171.6255.77
ARC-520 Cohort 771.4979.6863.92
ARC-520 Cohort 862.7476.2156.49

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs were defined as all AEs starting or worsening after commencement of treatment with investigational product. (NCT02535416)
Timeframe: post-dose through the end of study (Day 15 ± 1 day) plus 30 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
ARC-520 Cohort 12
ARC-520 Cohort 2A2
ARC-520 Cohort 21
ARC-520 Cohort 33
ARC-520 Cohort 43
ARC-520 Cohort 52
ARC-520 Cohort 65
ARC-520 Cohort 73
ARC-520 Cohort 82

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (Lambda z) of the Analytes of ARC-520

Analytes include AD0009 and AD0010 (cholesterol-conjugated siRNA targeting HBV) and MLP. (NCT02535416)
Timeframe: Day 1 pre-dose through 48 hours post-dose

,,,
Intervention1/hr (Mean)
Analyte AD0009Analyte AD0010Analyte MLP
ARC-520 Cohort 30.1700.1500.068
ARC-520 Cohort 60.1700.1340.070
ARC-520 Cohort 70.1720.1400.057
ARC-520 Cohort 80.1550.1170.058

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of the Analytes of ARC-520

Analytes include AD0009 and AD0010 (cholesterol-conjugated siRNA targeting HBV) and MLP. (NCT02535416)
Timeframe: Day 1 pre-dose through 48 hours post-dose

,,,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Analyte AD0009Analyte AD0010Analyte MLP
ARC-520 Cohort 3541504965076600
ARC-520 Cohort 6488804622075500
ARC-520 Cohort 7563504923385467
ARC-520 Cohort 87301764033112050

[back to top]

Mean Latency to Persistent Sleep

Per Protocol population based on subjects who completed treatment crossover (NCT02578186)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Diphenhydramine Hydrochloride19.1
Placebo27.1

[back to top]

PONV Incidence: Number of Participants With Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

The occurrence of PONV, as defined by the administration of antiemetics in the PACU between admission to PACU and discharge from PACU. (NCT02625181)
Timeframe: PACU recovery period

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline Measurement139
CDS Email Recommendations1323
CDS Email + Real TIme Recommenations1343

[back to top]

The Number of Prophylactic Interventions for PONV

the absolute number of prophylactic interventions applied between the admission of the patient in the holding room until admission to the PACU. (NCT02625181)
Timeframe: A specific time frame on the day of surgery: from the start of admission at the holding room to the end of the anesthetic case

Interventionprophylactic antiemetics administered (Mean)
Baseline Measurement2.196
CDS Email Recommendations2.176
CDS Email + Real TIme Recommenations2.129

[back to top]

Time to Discharge From the Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU)

This is the number of minutes from admission to the PACU until discharge, assessed up to 2 days (NCT02625181)
Timeframe: A specific time frame on the day of surgery: from the start of admission to the PACU to discharge from the PACU

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Baseline Measurement266
CDS Email Recommendations264
CDS Email + Real TIme Recommenations266

[back to top]

Adherence to PONV Guidelines

PONV guideline adherence: percentage of patients who received the exact number of prophylactic interventions for PONV that were recommended by the decision support. (NCT02625181)
Timeframe: A specific time frame on the day of surgery: the start of admission at the holding room to the end of the anesthetic case

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline Measurement666
CDS Email Recommendations5260
CDS Email + Real TIme Recommenations5863

[back to top]

Incidence of Subjects Significant QTc Changes in the EKG

The incidence of significant QTc prolongation was measured by comparing baseline EKG, 24 hours and 120 hours after surgery (NCT02635828)
Timeframe: 24 and 120 hours/discharge after end of surgery

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Triple Therapy PONV Prohylaxis0

[back to top]

PONV Incidence

The incidence of PONV (NCT02635828)
Timeframe: 24 hours after end of surgery

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Triple Therapy PONV Prohylaxis12

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation

Item 9 of the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item (PHQ-9) scale assesses suicidal ideation. It is scored from 0 to 3, with a score of 1 or greater indicating a patient has suicidal ideation. Participants with a PHQ-9 item 9 score of greater than or equal to 1 are reported for this outcome. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline3 Month6 Month12 Month
Intervention67696351
Usual Care909910692

[back to top]

Number of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Stimulant Use

Single items that assess non-prescribed stimulant use. Single item self-report dichotomized as none versus at least monthly use. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline3 Month6 Month12 Month
Intervention58978
Usual Care77172216

[back to top]

Number of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Opioid Use

Single items that assess non-prescribed opioid use. Single item self-report dichotomized as none versus at least monthly use. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline3 Month6 Month12 Month
Intervention18446
Usual Care4415206

[back to top]

Number of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Marijuana Use

Single items that assess marijuana use. Single item self-report dichotomized as none versus at least monthly use. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline3 Month6 Month12 Month
Intervention125606051
Usual Care177728279

[back to top]

Brief Pain Inventory

A brief measure scored on a 0 to 10 scale to assess a patient's pain, with a higher score indicating more severe pain; a score of 0 indicates no pain and a score of 10 indicates very severe pain. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline3 Month6 Month12 Month
Intervention6.84.34.13.9
Usual Care6.74.74.53.8

[back to top]

Cognitive Impairment Scale

The investigators will use the National Study on the Costs and Outcomes of Trauma (NSCOT) Cognitive Screen, a 4 - Item Traumatic Brain Injury / Post-concussive Symptom Screen. The scoring of the scale ranges from a minimum of 4 to a maximum of 20, with lower scores indicating a worse outcome. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline3 Month6 Month12 Month
Intervention13.513.313.213.8
Usual Care13.413.213.414.2

[back to top]

SF-36 Quality of Life

The SF-36 assess quality of life domains that span emotional health, overall health status, and role function; a score of 100 indicates perfect health and a score of 0 indicates extremely poor health. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline3 Month6 Month12 Month
Intervention44.338.338.439.2
Usual Care45.139.139.541.4

[back to top]

TSOS Patient Satisfaction: Overall Health Care

Satisfaction with health care was rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 indicating very dissatisfied and 5 indicating very satisfied. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline3 Month6 Month12 Month
Intervention4.43.94.03.9
Usual Care4.43.83.83.8

[back to top]

TSOS Patient Satisfaction: Mental Health Care

Satisfaction with mental health care was rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 indicating very dissatisfied and 5 indicating very satisfied. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 Month, 6 Month, 12 Month

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline3 Month6 Month12 Month
Intervention4.13.63.63.7
Usual Care4.03.53.43.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline PTSD Checklist- Civilian (PCL-C) Over the Course of the Year After Injury

The investigators will use the PTSD Checklist - Civilian (PCL-C). The scoring of the scale ranges from a minimum of 17 to a maximum of 85, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. The measure can also provide a rating of symptoms consistent with a diagnosis of PTSD. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Change from Baseline at 3 MonthsChange from Baseline at 6 MonthsChange from Baseline at 12 Months
Intervention-1.65-4.02-5.51
Usual Care0.08-1.44-4.25

[back to top]

Change From Baseline Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Over the Course of the Year After Injury

The investigators will use the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) as a continuous measure. The 10-item scale score ranges from 0-40, with higher values indicating a worse outcome. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Change from Baseline at 3 MonthsChange from Baseline at 6 MonthsChange from Baseline at 12 Months
Intervention-2.04-1.69-1.81
Usual Care-1.90-1.63-1.45

[back to top]

Change From Baseline Patient Health Questionnaire 9 Item Depression Scale Over the Course of the Year After Injury

The investigators will use the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item Depression Scale (PHQ-9). The scoring of the scale ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 27, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Change from Baseline at 3 MonthsChange from Baseline at 6 MonthsChange from Baseline at 12 Months
Intervention-0.79-1.17-1.84
Usual Care-0.50-0.90-2.16

[back to top]

Change From Baseline Short Form (SF)-12/36 Physical Function Over the Course of the Year After Injury

The investigators used the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form healthy survey (MOS SF-12/36) physical components summary to assess physical function. The minimum and maximum scores are 0-100 with higher scores representing a better outcome. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Change from Baseline at 3 MonthsChange from Baseline at 6 MonthsChange from Baseline at 12 Months
Intervention-16.78-14.17-13.23
Usual Care-15.90-13.83-11.68

[back to top]

The Number of Patients Experiencing Restlessness

Yes/No (NCT02657031)
Timeframe: 0-60 minutes

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Control Arm3
Study Arm3

[back to top]

Nausea

Reduction in 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score. The maximum possible change in VAS score is 100 mm, representing the complete relief of maximum nausea. A change of 0 mm corresponds to no change in nausea level, and a negative value indicates worsening of the nausea after the medication. (NCT02657031)
Timeframe: 0-60 minutes

Interventionmm (Mean)
Control Arm38.9
Study Arm22.9

[back to top]

Headache Following Intervention

Reduction in 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score. Positive values represent a reduction in headache severity. The maximum possible change in VAS score is 100 mm, representing the complete relief of a maximally severe headache. A change of 0 mm corresponds to no change in headache severity, and a negative value indicates worsening of the headache after the medication. (NCT02657031)
Timeframe: 0-60 minutes

Interventionmm (Mean)
Control Arm63.5
Study Arm43.5

[back to top]

Anxiety

Reduction in 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score. The maximum possible change in VAS score is 100 mm, representing the complete relief of maximum anxiety. A change of 0 mm corresponds to no change in anxiety level, and a negative value indicates worsening of the anxiety after the medication. (NCT02657031)
Timeframe: 0-60 minutes

Interventionmm (Mean)
Control Arm33.7
Study Arm21.2

[back to top]

The Number of Participants Experiencing Vomiting

Yes/No (NCT02657031)
Timeframe: 0-60 minutes

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Control Arm2
Study Arm3

[back to top]

Safety and Tolerability of the Treatment Regimen Based on Medication Side Effects and/or Adverse Events (AEs).

Number of Medication Side Effects and/or Adverse Events (AEs) (NCT02765256)
Timeframe: 105 days

InterventionEvents (Number)
Fluconazole31
Placebo12

[back to top]

The Change in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)

A secondary outcome measure will be the change in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein between the enrollment visit and day 15. The high-sensitivity C-reactive protein is a blood test which measures systemic inflammation. (NCT02765256)
Timeframe: enrollment visit (baseline) and 15 days

Interventionmg/dL (Median)
Fluconazole4.1
Placebo-2

[back to top]

Change in Disease Activity by Harvey Bradshaw Index

"The primary endpoint will be the change in disease activity, as measured by Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) score, between the enrollment visit and Day 15. All participants who withdraw for any reason prior to day 15 will be considered treatment failures. The HBI is a clinical score where points are given for each category below plus number of liquid bowel movements in previous day. A score of 3 or lower is considered remission. A score of 8 or higher is considered severe disease.~General Well Being Very well 0 points Slightly below par 1 point Poor 2 points Very poor 3 points Terrible 4 points~Abdominal Pain None 0 points Mild 1 point Moderate 2 points Severe 3 points~Abdominal Mass None 0 points Dubious 1 point Definite 2 points Definite and tender 3 points~Complications None 0 points Arthralgias +1 point Uveitis +1 point Erythema Nodosum + 1 point Aphthous ulcers +1 point Pyoderma Gangrenosum + 1 point Anal fissure + 1 point New fistula + 1" (NCT02765256)
Timeframe: enrollment visit (baseline) and 15 days

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Fluconazole-5
Placebo-3

[back to top]

Change in Disease Activity by Fecal Calprotectin (FCP)

The second primary outcome measure will be the change in disease activity, as measured by fecal calprotectin, between the enrollment visit and day 15. The fecal calprotectin is a stool test which measures intestinal inflammation. (NCT02765256)
Timeframe: enrollment visit (baseline) and 15 days

Interventionmcg/g (Median)
Fluconazole-16.5
Placebo-380.5

[back to top]

Patient Sedation Scores

"Patient Sedation Score at 2 hours~Ask the patient How drowsy do you feel at the moment? 0 = None (Not drowsy at all)~= Mild (Slightly drowsy)~= Moderate (Quite drowsy)~= Severe (Extremely drowsy)" (NCT02935699)
Timeframe: 2 hours

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Test Drug0.46
Control0.88

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Needed to Return to Treatment Center

Number of patients who needed to return to treatment center approximately 24 hours after discharge (NCT02935699)
Timeframe: up to 24 hrs

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Test Drug7
Control19

[back to top]

Change of Patient Rated Pruritus Score

"Change from baseline to 2 hours in patient-rated pruritus Severity score (values at 2 hours minus Baseline)~Patient Pruritus Severity Score Ask the patient How severely are your hives itching at the moment? 0 = none~= mild (minimal awareness, easily tolerated)~= moderate (definite awareness, quite bothersome)~= severe (difficult to tolerate)" (NCT02935699)
Timeframe: 2 hr

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Test Drug-1.61
Control-1.50

[back to top]

Time to Discharge

Time spent (hours) at the treatment center (NCT02935699)
Timeframe: up to 24 hours

Interventionhours (Mean)
Test Drug1.71
Control2.07

[back to top]

Change in Pain Score According to the Numeric Pain Intensity Scale

Numeric Pain Intensity scale is a standard rating tool for pain, ranging from 0-10, with 0=no pain and 10=worst pain imaginable. (NCT02972502)
Timeframe: Change from baseline (prior to treatment) to 1 hour post treatment (1 hour)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Metoclopramide (Reglan)-2.86
Haloperidol (Haldol)-5.13

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response

Objective response was defined as percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or with complete response with incomplete peripheral recovery (CRi) as per National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. CR was defined as no circulating blasts or extramedullary disease, no lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, skin/gum infiltration/testicular mass/central nervous system involvement, trilineage hematopoiesis and less than 5 percentage blasts, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than 1000 per micro liter, platelets less than 100 000 per micro liter, no recurrence for 4 weeks. CRi meet all criteria for complete response except platelet count and/or ANC. (NCT02999633)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death (maximum duration: 12.1 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Isatuximab0

[back to top]

Post Concussion Symptoms Assessed by Post-concussive Symptom Scale

The post-concussive symptom scale is a questionnaire administered verbally. The post-concussive symptom ranges from 0 to 132. 0= no post-concussive symptoms. 132= severe post-concussive symptoms. (NCT03056352)
Timeframe: 7 days

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Metoclopramide11.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Sustained Headache Relief

"Sustained headache relief is defined as achieving a headache level of mild or none within two hours and maintaining a level of mild or none for 48 hours. Patient self-evaluated pain level is solicited every half hour for two hours in the Emergency Department and then by telephone 48 hours after medication administration." (NCT03056352)
Timeframe: 2 hours thru 48 hours after treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Metoclopramide12

[back to top]

Number of Participants Satisfied With Medication; Assessed by Self-evaluation

"Satisfaction is measured by a positive response to the question Would you want to receive the same medication during a subsequent visit for post-traumatic headache?" (NCT03056352)
Timeframe: 48 hours after treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Metoclopramide16

[back to top]

0-10 Pain Scale on Which 0 = no Pain and 10= the Worst Pain Imaginable

Improvement in this 0 to 10 verbal rating scale (NCT03220958)
Timeframe: 1 hour after medication administration

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Metoclopramide5.2
Placebo3.8

[back to top]

Headache Days

"Number of days with any headache. Participants report the actual number of days they experienced headache. A day begins when they awake for the beginning of daily activities and ends when they go to sleep after completion of daily activities" (NCT03220958)
Timeframe: 7 days after ED visit

Interventiondays (Mean)
Metoclopramide3.3
Placebo3.3

[back to top]

Sustained Headache Relief

Achieving a headache intensity of mild or none in the ED without use of rescue medication and maintaining a level of mild or none. Participants rate their headache as none, mild, moderate, or severe (NCT03220958)
Timeframe: 48 hours after medication administration

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Metoclopramide24
Placebo18

[back to top]

Change in Programmed Death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) Levels Between Responders and Non-Responders

PD-L1 levels will be obtained at baseline and after treatment with both agents. The change in levels will be determined between the two measurements, and these changes will be compared between responders and non-responders. Although it is expected to have low power, in each case the comparisons between the two response categories will be made using a Wilcoxon rank sum test, with the resulting p-value intended to help describe the differences noted. (NCT03258593)
Timeframe: Baseline and after treatment with both agents, from enrollment up to 5 weeks

,,
Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Responders PDL1 levels after treatment (vs baselineNon-responders PDL1 levels after treatment (vs baseline)
Expansion Cohort - Durvalumab 1500mg Intravenous (IV) Every 4 Weeks (Q4WK) + Vicineum 30 mg342.5228.4
Run-In Cohort - Durvalumab 1500mg Intravenous (IV) Every 4 Weeks (Q4WK) + Vicineum 30 mg573.4505.9
Total Cohort - Durvalumab 1500mg Intravenous (IV) Every 4 Weeks (Q4WK) + Vicineum 30 mg533.8489.7

[back to top]

Changes in the Immune Parameters Obtained From Blood Samples

All evaluable participants will have determinations of many immune parameters at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. The changes in the parameters obtained from blood samples will be determined at baseline vs. 3 months, and baseline vs. 6 months. Comparisons of the paired values will be performed using a Wilcoxon signed rank test, and a Hochberg adjustment may be used. (NCT03258593)
Timeframe: baseline, 3 weeks, and 5 weeks

,,
Interventionpg/mL (Median)
3 weeks Interferon Gamma (IFN-γ) vs Baseline5 weeks Interferon Gamma (IFN-γ) vs Baseline3 weeks Interleukin 6 (IL-6) vs Baseline5 weeks Interleukin 6 (IL-6) vs Baseline3 weeks Interleukin 8 (IL-8) vs Baseline5 weeks Interleukin 8 (IL-8) vs Baseline3 weeks Interleukin 10 (IL-10) vs Baseline5 weeks Interleukin 10 (IL-10) vs Baseline3 weeks Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF-α) vs Baseline5 weeks Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF-α) vs Baseline
Expansion Cohort - Durvalumab 1500mg Intravenous (IV) Every 4 Weeks (Q4WK) + Vicineum 30 mg0.6401.7500.1800.2200.880-0.1600.070.1200.2600.270
Run-In Cohort - Durvalumab 1500mg Intravenous (IV) Every 4 Weeks (Q4WK) + Vicineum 30 mg4.3403.2900.3950.5400.730-0.3950.1200.1050.4000.240
Total Cohort - Durvalumab 1500mg Intravenous (IV) Every 4 Weeks (Q4WK) + Vicineum 30 mg3.8503.1200.2800.4000.860-0.1800.1200.1200.3500.270

[back to top]

Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT)

A DLT will be defined as any Grade 3 or higher toxicity that occurs during the initial 6-week period the subject is on treatment (i.e., the DLT evaluation period). Grade 3 is severe, grade 4 is life-threatening and grade 5 is death related to adverse event. (NCT03258593)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5
Expansion Cohort - Durvalumab 1500mg Intravenous (IV) Every 4 Weeks (Q4WK) + Vicineum 30 mg000
Run-In Cohort - Durvalumab 1500mg Intravenous (IV) Every 4 Weeks (Q4WK) + Vicineum 30 mg33.300

[back to top]

Number of Grades 1-5 Adverse Events

Adverse events were assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0). A non-serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence. A serious adverse event is an adverse event or suspected adverse reaction that results in death, a life-threatening adverse drug experience, hospitalization, disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect or important medical events that jeopardize the patient or subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the previous outcomes mentioned. Grade 1 is mild, grade 2 is moderate, grade 3 is severe, grade 4 is life-threatening, and grade 5 is death related to adverse event. (NCT03258593)
Timeframe: Through study completion, an average of 315 days

,,
Interventionadverse events (Number)
Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5
Expansion Cohort - Durvalumab 1500mg Intravenous (IV) Every 4 Weeks (Q4WK) + Vicineum 30 mg33000
Run-In Cohort - Durvalumab 1500mg Intravenous (IV) Every 4 Weeks (Q4WK) + Vicineum 30 mg129400
Total Cohort - Durvalumab 1500mg Intravenous (IV) Every 4 Weeks (Q4WK) + Vicineum 30 mg1512400

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic Parameters in Urine Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Vicineum

Evaluate the pharmacokinetic parameters of Vicineum obtained by urine samples. Urinary Vicineum (in ng/mL). (NCT03258593)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 1, week 6, week 12

,,
Interventionng/mL (Median)
BaselineWeek 1, Day 1Week 1Week 6Week 12
Expansion Cohort - Durvalumab 1500mg Intravenous (IV) Every 4 Weeks (Q4WK) + Vicineum 30 mg1.5305.41.51.57.5
Run-In Cohort - Durvalumab 1500mg Intravenous (IV) Every 4 Weeks (Q4WK) + Vicineum 30 mg2.54320.02.63.23.5
Total Cohort - Durvalumab 1500mg Intravenous (IV) Every 4 Weeks (Q4WK) + Vicineum 30 mg3.23738.74.74.34.8

[back to top]

Response Rate

The response to treatment will be determined for evaluable participants who receive treatment and was measured as follows: Recurrence is suspected and/or determined by urine cytology and/or cystoscopic exam and then confirmed pathologically after a transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). Complete response rate for carcinoma in situ (CIS) is defined as the absence of CIS upon follow-up biopsies. Disease progression is defined as upstaging from a lower stage to a higher stage (e.g., Ta to T1-T4 or T1 to T2-4; CIS to T1 or CIS to T2-T4; or any N+ or M+ in these high-grade tumors). (NCT03258593)
Timeframe: From enrollment until event occurrence (recurrence, progression); twelve weeks.

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Complete responseRecurrenceDisease progression
Expansion Cohort - Durvalumab 1500mg Intravenous (IV) Every 4 Weeks (Q4WK) + Vicineum 30 mg66.633.333.3
Run-In Cohort - Durvalumab 1500mg Intravenous (IV) Every 4 Weeks (Q4WK) + Vicineum 30 mg41.658.325
Total Cohort - Durvalumab 1500mg Intravenous (IV) Every 4 Weeks (Q4WK) + Vicineum 30 mg46.653.326.6

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Durvalumab

The MTD will be identified based on being the dose level at which 0 or 1 participants in 6 has a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). A DLT will be defined as any Grade 3 or higher toxicity that occurs during the initial 6-week period the subject is on treatment (i.e., the DLT evaluation period). Grade 3 is severe, grade 4 is life-threatening and grade 5 is death related to adverse event. (NCT03258593)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

InterventionMg (Number)
All Participants1500

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival (DFS)

A DFS curve will be created using the Kaplan-Meier method based on all participants considered to be evaluable based on having received protocol treatment. DFS survival is defined as the time from the start of treatment until disease recurrence or death. Recurrence is suspected and/or determined by urine cytology and/or cystoscopic exam and then confirmed pathologically after a bladder biopsy or transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). (NCT03258593)
Timeframe: Assessed from start of therapy to disease recurrence or last follow up; up to 1 year.

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Run-In Cohort - Durvalumab 1500mg Intravenous (IV) Every 4 Weeks (Q4WK) + Vicineum 30 mg12.8
Expansion Cohort - Durvalumab 1500mg Intravenous (IV) Every 4 Weeks (Q4WK) + Vicineum 30 mg50.1
Total Cohort - Durvalumab 1500mg Intravenous (IV) Every 4 Weeks (Q4WK) + Vicineum 30 mg13.2

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Vicineum

The MTD will be identified based on being the dose level at which 0 or 1 participants in 6 has a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). A DLT will be defined as any Grade 3 or higher toxicity that occurs during the initial 6-week period the subject is on treatment (i.e., the DLT evaluation period). Grade 3 is severe, grade 4 is life-threatening and grade 5 is death related to adverse event. (NCT03258593)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

InterventionMg (Number)
All Participants30

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0)

Here is the number of participants with serious and/or non-serious adverse events assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0). A non-serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence. A serious adverse event is an adverse event or suspected adverse reaction that results in death, a life-threatening adverse drug experience, hospitalization, disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect or important medical events that jeopardize the patient or subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the previous outcomes mentioned. (NCT03258593)
Timeframe: Through study completion, an average of 315 days.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Run-In Cohort - Durvalumab 1500mg Intravenous (IV) Every 4 Weeks (Q4WK) + Vicineum 30 mg12
Expansion Cohort - Durvalumab 1500mg Intravenous (IV) Every 4 Weeks (Q4WK) + Vicineum 30 mg3

[back to top]

Change in Programmed Death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) Levels Between Participants Who Respond and Have Stable Disease (SD), and Those With Progressive Disease (PD)

PD-L1 levels will be obtained at baseline and after treatment with both agents. The change will be compared between those who respond or have stable disease (SD (clinical benefit=Complete Response (CR)+Partial Response (PR)+SD) and those with progressive disease (PD). Although it is expected to have low power, in each case the comparisons between the two response categories will be made using a Wilcoxon rank sum test, with the resulting p-value intended to help describe the differences noted. (NCT03258593)
Timeframe: Baseline and after treatment, from enrollment up to 5 weeks

,,
Interventionpg/mL (Median)
PDL1 level changes in participants with SD (treatment vs baseline)PDL1 level changes in participants with PD (treatment vs baseline
Expansion Cohort - Durvalumab 1500mg Intravenous (IV) Every 4 Weeks (Q4WK) + Vicineum 30 mg342.5228.4
Run-In Cohort - Durvalumab 1500mg Intravenous (IV) Every 4 Weeks (Q4WK) + Vicineum 30 mg533.8516
Total Cohort - Durvalumab 1500mg Intravenous (IV) Every 4 Weeks (Q4WK) + Vicineum 30 mg505.9494.8

[back to top]

Attention

Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT) - The outcome is payment for the task which was a predetermined linear combination of the inverse reaction time, the number of false positives (response when they participant should not have responded), and the number of lapses (reaction time >500ms). Specifically, the payment was determined by the formula: (inverse reaction time - 3.5)/0.42 - (0.5*(number of false positives-4.7)/6.14) - (0.5*(number of lapses-1.3)/2.58) + 15. Higher payments indicate better performance. Although the theoretical minimum possible score is negative infinity, in practice, the minimum possible payment was censored at zero. The maximum theoretical payment is undefined. The payment reflects overall performance. The outcome measure is the average of the measures collected for each individual after the baseline period (starting on day 9). (NCT03322358)
Timeframe: From date of entering the study through completion of the study after 28 business days, attention is measured once every two business days (which of the two is randomly assigned).

InterventionIndian Rupees (Mean)
Control13.001
Naps Only13.338
Home Sleep Aids Only13.024
Home Sleep Aids + Sleep Incentives13.005
Naps + Home Sleep Aids13.174
Naps + Home Sleep Aids + Sleep Incentives13.150

[back to top]

Inhibitory Control

Hearts and flowers test -- The outcome used is the payment for the task which is a linear combination of the participant's accuracy (percent correct) and reaction time (measured in milliseconds). Specifically, the payment for this task is determined by the formula: 1.5 * ((percent correct - 0.84) / 0.2 - (reaction time - 526.5) / 95.2) + 15. The outcome measure is the average of the measures collected for each individual after the baseline period (starting on day 9). (NCT03322358)
Timeframe: From date of entering the study through completion of the study after 28 business days, the inhibitory control is measured once every two business days (which of the two is randomly assigned).

InterventionIndian Rupees (Mean)
Control14.982
Naps Only14.957
Home Sleep Aids Only15.078
Home Sleep Aids + Sleep Incentives14.982
Naps + Home Sleep Aids15.039
Naps + Home Sleep Aids + Sleep Incentives15.103

[back to top]

Depression

"The investigators measure depression using a scale defined by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ), which is a self-administered version of the PRIME-MD diagnostic instrument for common mental disorders. Each criteria is scored from 0 (not at all, a better outcome) to 3 (nearly every day, a worse outcome). Scores on each question are summed, defining depression severity. The outcome measure was the total summed score captured at endline (day 28). The outcome is thus measured on a scale from 0 to 27, where 0 represents the best outcome and 27 represents the worst outcome." (NCT03322358)
Timeframe: Depression is measured once in the baseline on the first day of the study and a second time in the endline, which takes place on the last day of the study, 28 business days after the first day in the study for the participant.

InterventionScore on 0-27 scale (Mean)
Control5.208
Naps Only4.676
Home Sleep Aids Only5.851
Home Sleep Aids + Sleep Incentives5.095
Naps + Home Sleep Aids5.608
Naps + Home Sleep Aids + Sleep Incentives5.147

[back to top]

Blood Pressure

Systolic, Diastolic. The outcome measurements reported here are those captured after the baseline period (starting on day 9). Each measure is first winsorized at the 5% level and standardized using control group data, to mean 0 and standard deviation 1. The measure is then multiplied by -1 such that higher values represent improvements in health. In order to analyze these outcomes jointly, this measure is next averaged to obtain an overall measure and standardized again. The mean is taken across all participant observations within a group regardless of the time after the baseline period. There are no clinically relevant values and the measure has no max and min. (NCT03322358)
Timeframe: From date of entering the study through completion of the study after 28 business days, blood pressure is measured once every block of three business days. The date of measurement is randomized within each block between the first, second, and third day.

InterventionBlood pressure index (Mean)
Control0.000
Naps Only0.135
Home Sleep Aids Only0.110
Home Sleep Aids + Sleep Incentives0.071
Naps + Home Sleep Aids0.027
Naps + Home Sleep Aids + Sleep Incentives0.178

[back to top]

Activities of Daily Living

"The investigators use survey questions taken from the commonly used SF-36 Health survey asking participants how much their health has limited them in a certain number of activities. The possible answers range from they did not limit you at all (0, the best outcome) to limited you a lot (3, the worst outcome). The final scale, which is the sum of the answers, goes from 0 for people who are not limited at all in their daily life by their health to 36 for people who are substantially limited in their daily life by their health. The outcome measure is the 0-36 scale captured at endline (day 28)." (NCT03322358)
Timeframe: Activities of daily living are measured once in the baseline on the first day of the study and a second time in the endline, which takes place on the last day of the study, 28 business days after the first day in the study for the participant.

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Control8.961
Naps Only7.52
Home Sleep Aids Only7.8
Home Sleep Aids + Sleep Incentives7.486
Naps + Home Sleep Aids7.36
Naps + Home Sleep Aids + Sleep Incentives7.553

[back to top]

Memory

Corsi block span - The investigators' measure of memory is the longest correct sequence of blocks lighting in a random order that a participant can reproduce. The range is from a minimum of 0 (worst performance) to a maximum of 9 (best performance). The outcome reported for this task is the participant's payment from the task, which is computed based on their longest span as well as baseline data: 2.29*(maximum span - 5.3) / 1.17 + 13. The outcome measure is the average of the measures collected for each individual after the baseline period (starting on day 9). (NCT03322358)
Timeframe: From date of entering the study through completion of the study after 28 business days, memory is measured once every two business days (which of the two is randomly assigned).

InterventionIndian Rupees (Mean)
Control14.643
Naps Only14.834
Home Sleep Aids Only14.931
Home Sleep Aids + Sleep Incentives14.483
Naps + Home Sleep Aids14.609
Naps + Home Sleep Aids + Sleep Incentives14.645

[back to top]

Number of Days of Illness in Past Week

Illness is measured as the number of days of illness (e.g. cough, fever) in the past week. The outcome measure is the number of days of illness in the past week self-reported at endline (day 28). (NCT03322358)
Timeframe: Illness is measured once in the baseline on the first day of the study and a second time in the endline, which takes place on the last day of the study, 28 business days after the first day in the study for the participant.

InterventionDays of illness in the past week (Mean)
Control2.08
Naps Only1.732
Home Sleep Aids Only1.973
Home Sleep Aids + Sleep Incentives2.041
Naps + Home Sleep Aids2.351
Naps + Home Sleep Aids + Sleep Incentives1.853

[back to top]

Physical Fitness

The outcome measure is the number of kilometers participants can cover on a stationary exercise cycle over a period of 30 minutes, as reported on the display of the exercise cycle.The cycle was set to the same level of resistance for all participants. (NCT03322358)
Timeframe: Physical fitness is measured only once in the endline, which takes place on the last day of the study, 28 business days after the first day in the study for the participant.

Interventionkm (Mean)
Control3.717
Naps Only3.857
Home Sleep Aids Only3.941
Home Sleep Aids + Sleep Incentives3.934
Naps + Home Sleep Aids3.697
Naps + Home Sleep Aids + Sleep Incentives3.571

[back to top]

Self-reported Pain

The investigators use a simple scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain imaginable) for the participant to rate their pain intensity. The outcome measure was the self-reported pain intensity captured at endline (day 28). (NCT03322358)
Timeframe: Pain is measured once in the baseline on the first day of the study and a second time in the endline, which takes place on the last day of the study, 28 days after the first day in the study for the participant.

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Control2.740
Naps Only3.070
Home Sleep Aids Only2.095
Home Sleep Aids + Sleep Incentives2.838
Naps + Home Sleep Aids2.608
Naps + Home Sleep Aids + Sleep Incentives2.800

[back to top]

Sleep Per 24 Hours

Sleep is measured via actigraph. 24 hour sleep is the sum of night sleep and nap sleep. (NCT03322358)
Timeframe: Actigraphs are worn consistently throughout the study. The sleep per 24 hour period outcome is then measured every day through study completion, which is 28 business days (as well as intervening holidays and Sundays) for each participant.

InterventionHours of sleep/24 hours (Mean)
Control5.61
Naps Only5.81
Home Sleep Aids Only5.99
Home Sleep Aids + Sleep Incentives6.23
Naps + Home Sleep Aids6.08
Naps + Home Sleep Aids + Sleep Incentives6.35

[back to top]

Subjective Well-being

The measure of the outcome is based on two survey questions taken from Gallup Survey. In the first question, participants are asked to state a number from 0 to 10, with 0 being a feeling that the participant has the worst possible life while 10 is a feeling that the participant has the best possible life. In the second question, participants are asked to state a number from 0 to 10, with 0 being a feeling that the participant is dissatisfied with life as a whole and 10 being a feeling that the participant is satisfied with life as a whole. The final scale, generated by summing the individual items, is then from 0 for highly dissatisfied people to 20 for highly satisfied people. The outcome measure is the 0-20 scale captured at endline (day 28). (NCT03322358)
Timeframe: Subjective well-being is measured once in the baseline on the first day of the study and a second time in the endline, which takes place on the last day of the study, 28 business days after the first day in the study for the participant.

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Control11.554
Naps Only12.521
Home Sleep Aids Only11.906
Home Sleep Aids + Sleep Incentives11.919
Naps + Home Sleep Aids12.757
Naps + Home Sleep Aids + Sleep Incentives12.199

[back to top]

Happiness

"The investigators use a question adapted from a Gallup poll and from the SF-36 survey by RAND that ask participants to rate their happiness on the present day from Not at all happy (0, the worst outcome) to very happy (4, the best outcome). The outcome measure is the average of the measures collected for each individual after the baseline period (starting on day 9)" (NCT03322358)
Timeframe: Happiness is measured in the baseline on the first day of the study, randomly once every block of three business days during the study, and a last time in the endline, on the last day of the study, 28 business days after the participant's first day.

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Control2.455
Naps Only2.517
Home Sleep Aids Only2.421
Home Sleep Aids + Sleep Incentives2.440
Naps + Home Sleep Aids2.580
Naps + Home Sleep Aids + Sleep Incentives2.502

[back to top]

Total Perioperative Morphine Equivalents

All administered opioids measured as morphine equivalents (mg/kg) (NCT03435692)
Timeframe: Post-Operative Days 0-2

Interventionmg/kg (Mean)
Lumbar Epidural Catheter (< 6 Years Old)0.54
Lumbar Plexus Catheter (< 6 Years Old)0.7
Lumbar Epidural Catheter (6 Years and Older)0.85
Lumbar Plexus Catheter (6 Years and Older)0.83
Patient Controlled Analgesia (6 Years and Older)2.23

[back to top]

Nausea

% of patients with nausea (NCT03435692)
Timeframe: Post-Operative Days 0-2

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Lumbar Epidural Catheter (< 6 Years Old)40
Lumbar Plexus Catheter (< 6 Years Old)33.3
Lumbar Epidural Catheter (6 Years and Older)71.4
Lumbar Plexus Catheter (6 Years and Older)55.6
Patient Controlled Analgesia (6 Years and Older)71.4

[back to top]

Muscle Spasm

% of patients w/ muscle spasm (NCT03435692)
Timeframe: Post-Operative days 0-2

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Lumbar Epidural Catheter (< 6 Years Old)80
Lumbar Plexus Catheter (< 6 Years Old)55.6
Lumbar Epidural Catheter (6 Years and Older)100
Lumbar Plexus Catheter (6 Years and Older)44.4
Patient Controlled Analgesia (6 Years and Older)71.4

[back to top]

Maximum Pain Score

"Mean of Maximum Pain Score POD 0-2~Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Pain Scale (FLACC) for children 1-3 years of age, Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FPS-R) for children over age 3 and the Numeric scale (0-10) for children over age 7.~minimum value = 0, maximum value 10 (higher score is worse)" (NCT03435692)
Timeframe: Post-Operative Days 0-2

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Lumbar Epidural Catheter (< 6 Years Old)5.5
Lumbar Plexus Catheter (< 6 Years Old)4.3
Lumbar Epidural Catheter (6 Years and Older)6.4
Lumbar Plexus Catheter (6 Years and Older)5.5
Patient Controlled Analgesia (6 Years and Older)6.5

[back to top]

Itching

% of patients with itching (NCT03435692)
Timeframe: Post-Operative Days 0-2

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Lumbar Epidural Catheter (< 6 Years Old)40
Lumbar Plexus Catheter (< 6 Years Old)33.3
Lumbar Epidural Catheter (6 Years and Older)28.6
Lumbar Plexus Catheter (6 Years and Older)22.2
Patient Controlled Analgesia (6 Years and Older)42.9

[back to top]

Hospital Length of Stay

Total hospital length of stay (NCT03435692)
Timeframe: Through hospital stay, an average of 2-3 days.

Interventiondays (Mean)
Lumbar Epidural Catheter (< 6 Years Old)1.9
Lumbar Plexus Catheter (< 6 Years Old)2
Lumbar Epidural Catheter (6 Years and Older)2.9
Lumbar Plexus Catheter (6 Years and Older)2.5
Patient Controlled Analgesia (6 Years and Older)3.2

[back to top]

Simulated Driving Performance in Healthy Participants as Measured by Standard Deviation of Lateral Position (SDLP) Using the Cognitive Research Corporation Driving Simulator-MiniSim (CRCDS-MiniSim)

"The standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP) is the primary parameter used as stable measure of driving performance with high test-retest reliability. It measures the driver's ability to stay in a constant position within the driving lane.~LS Means were analyzed using a mixed repeated measures model with fixed effects for sequence, period, and treatment, with repeated observations for subjects for each of the driving time points." (NCT03459612)
Timeframe: 24 hours post dose in each dose period

Interventioncentimeters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo32.04
100 mg Lasmiditan31.07
200 mg Lasmiditan31.00
50 mg Diphenhydramine36.10

[back to top]

Number of Correct Responses in Driving Performance Using CogScreen Symbol Digit Coding (SDC) Test

The SDC Test, a digit symbol substitution test that is sensitive to changes in information processing speed, provides measures of response speed and accuracy. The test was administered prior to the simulated driving sessions. The principal test score measures the number of correct responses in 120 seconds. SDC was used in this study to measure attention, visual scanning, working memory, and speed of information processing. A measure of recall accuracy A higher score indicates greater processing speed (NCT03459612)
Timeframe: 8 hours postdose in each dose period

InterventionCorrect responses (Mean)
Placebo69.48
100 mg Lasmiditan69.76
200 mg Lasmiditan68.88
50 mg Diphenhydramine69.01

[back to top]

Simulated Driving Performance in Healthy Participants as Measured by Standard Deviation of Lateral Position (SDLP) Using the Cognitive Research Corporation Driving Simulator-MiniSim (CRCDS-MiniSim)

"The standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP) is the primary parameter used as stable measure of driving performance with high test-retest reliability. It measures the driver's ability to stay in a constant position within the driving lane.~LS Means were analyzed using a mixed repeated measures model with fixed effects for sequence, period, and treatment, with repeated observations for subjects for each of the driving time points." (NCT03459612)
Timeframe: 8 hours postdose in each dosing period

Interventioncentimeters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo29.85
100 mg Lasmiditan30.83
200 mg Lasmiditan31.61
50 mg Diphenhydramine34.83

[back to top]

Number of Correct Responses in Driving Performance Using CogScreen Symbol Digit Coding (SDC) Test

The SDC Test, a digit symbol substitution test that is sensitive to changes in information processing speed, provides measures of response speed and accuracy. The test was administered prior to the simulated driving sessions. The principal test score measures the number of correct responses in 120 seconds. SDC was used in this study to measure attention, visual scanning, working memory, and speed of information processing. Scores range from 0 (No correct responses). A higher score indicates greater processing speed. (NCT03459612)
Timeframe: 12 hours postdose in each dose period

InterventionCorrect responses (Mean)
Placebo71.33
100 mg Lasmiditan70.91
200 mg Lasmiditan72.16
50 mg Diphenhydramine68.21

[back to top]

Number of Correct Responses in Driving Performance Using CogScreen Symbol Digit Coding (SDC) Test

The SDC Test, a digit symbol substitution test that is sensitive to changes in information processing speed, provides measures of response speed and accuracy. The test was administered prior to the simulated driving sessions. The principal test score measures the number of correct responses in 120 seconds. SDC was used in this study to measure attention, visual scanning, working memory, and speed of information processing. Scores range from 0 (No correct responses). A higher score indicates greater processing speed. (NCT03459612)
Timeframe: 24 hours postdose in each dose period

InterventionCorrect responses (Mean)
Placebo70.78
100 mg Lasmiditan70.53
200 mg Lasmiditan70.66
50 mg Diphenhydramine68.31

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Observed Drug Concentration (Cmax) of Lasmiditan

PK: Cmax of Lasmiditan (NCT03459612)
Timeframe: Day 1: Predose, 0.5 hour (hr), 1hr, 1.5hr, 2hr, 3hr, 4hr, 6hr, 8hr, 10 hr, 12hr, 24hr, 36hr, 48hr postdose

Interventionnanograms per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
100 mg Lasmiditan183
200 mg Lasmiditan366

[back to top]

PK: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC) of Lasmiditan to the Last Timepoint (0-tlast)

PK: AUC of Lasmiditan until the last time a concentration is detected. (NCT03459612)
Timeframe: Day 1: Predose, 0.5 hour (hr), 1hr, 1.5hr, 2hr, 3hr, 4hr, 6hr, 8hr, 10 hr, 12hr, 24hr, 36hr, 48hr postdose

Interventionng*hour per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
100 mg Lasmiditan1060
200 mg Lasmiditan2230

[back to top]

Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) Score

The KSS is used to assess subjective level of sleepiness. This is a participant self-report measure of situational sleepiness and provides an assessment of alertness/sleepiness at a particular point in time. It is a 9-point categorical Likert scale on which the participant rates sleepiness from 1 (very alert) to 9 (very sleepy/fighting sleep), with higher scores indicating more sleepiness and lower scores indicating more alertness. (NCT03459612)
Timeframe: 8 hours postdose in each dose period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo3.19
100 mg Lasmiditan3.46
200 mg Lasmiditan3.90
50 mg Diphenhydramine3.93

[back to top]

Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) Score

The KSS is used to assess subjective level of sleepiness. This is a participant self-report measure of situational sleepiness and provides an assessment of alertness/sleepiness at a particular point in time. It is a 9-point categorical Likert scale on which the participant rates sleepiness from 1 (very alert) to 9 (very sleepy/fighting sleep), with higher scores indicating more sleepiness and lower scores indicating more alertness. (NCT03459612)
Timeframe: 12 hours postdose in each dose period

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo3.43
100 mg Lasmiditan3.94
200 mg Lasmiditan3.79
50 mg Diphenhydramine4.74

[back to top]

Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) Score

The KSS is used to assess subjective level of sleepiness. This is a participant self-report measure of situational sleepiness and provides an assessment of alertness/sleepiness at a particular point in time. It is a 9-point categorical Likert scale on which the participant rates sleepiness from 1 (very alert) to 9 (very sleepy/fighting sleep), with higher scores indicating more sleepiness and lower scores indicating more alertness. (NCT03459612)
Timeframe: 24 hours postdose in each dose period

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo4.19
100 mg Lasmiditan3.72
200 mg Lasmiditan3.93
50 mg Diphenhydramine4.75

[back to top]

Simulated Driving Performance in Healthy Participants as Measured by Standard Deviation of Lateral Position (SDLP) Using the Cognitive Research Corporation Driving Simulator-MiniSim (CRCDS-MiniSim)

"The standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP) is the primary parameter used as stable measure of driving performance with high test-retest reliability. It measures the driver's ability to stay in a constant position within the driving lane.~LS Means were analyzed using a mixed repeated measures model with fixed effects for sequence, period, and treatment, with repeated observations for subjects for each of the driving time points." (NCT03459612)
Timeframe: 12 hours postdose in each dose period

Interventioncentimeters (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo30.41
100 mg Lasmiditan30.29
200 mg Lasmiditan30.09
50 mg Diphenhydramine34.72

[back to top]

Total Number of Collisions

Total collisions are the sum off collisions with other vehicles and off-road crashes. Collision counts also included the number of times that a lane deviation exceeded 4 feet but where no collision occurred ( a crash-likely event). (NCT03459612)
Timeframe: 8 hours postdose in each dose period

Interventioncollisions (Mean)
Placebo0.1
100 mg Lasmiditan0.0
200 mg Lasmiditan0.0
50 mg Diphenhydramine0.4

[back to top]

Total Number of Collisions

Total collisions are the sum off collisions with other vehicles and off-road crashes. Collision counts also included the number of times that a lane deviation exceeded 4 feet but where no collision occurred ( a crash-likely event). (NCT03459612)
Timeframe: 24 hours postdose in each dose period

Interventioncollisions (Mean)
Placebo0.2
100 mg Lasmiditan0.0
200 mg Lasmiditan0.2
50 mg Diphenhydramine0.6

[back to top]

Total Number of Collisions

Total collisions are the sum off collisions with other vehicles and off-road crashes. Collision counts also included the number of times that a lane deviation exceeded 4 feet but where no collision occurred ( a crash-likely event). (NCT03459612)
Timeframe: 12 hours postdose in each dose period

Interventioncollisions (Mean)
Placebo0.1
100 mg Lasmiditan0.0
200 mg Lasmiditan0.1
50 mg Diphenhydramine0.2

[back to top]

Time Patient Was Placed in Straitjacket/Restraint Post Intervention Treatment

If patient was placed in a straitjacket post intervention due to aggression - this would be noted on the outcomes form which includes a checklist at certain time intervals 20,40,60 and 120 minutes post intervention treatment. (NCT03639558)
Timeframe: 20, 40, 60 and 120 minutes post intervention treatment

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Restraints at 20 minutesRestraints at 40 minutesRestraints at 60 minutesRestraints at 120 minutes
Haloperidol + Promethazine161395
Haloperidol + Promethazine + Chlorpromazine171086

[back to top]

Time Taken for Patient to Fall Asleep Post Intervention

Patient has fallen asleep and is no longer aggressive post intervention treatment and will be noted on the outcomes form which includes a checklist of different time intervals: 20, 40, 60 and 120 minutes post intervention treatment. (NCT03639558)
Timeframe: 20, 40, 60 and 120 minutes post intervention treatment

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Asleep at 20 minutesAsleep at 40 minutesAsleep at 60 minutesAsleep at 120 minutes
Haloperidol + Promethazine291018
Haloperidol + Promethazine + Chlorpromazine092524

[back to top]

Number of Participants According to the Time Taken for Aggressive Behaviour to Change to Calm and Tranquil

Patient no longer exhibiting aggressive behavior both verbal and physical post intervention treatment. A primary measure of outcome form will contain a Calm or Tranquil column followed by four rows: 20 mins, 40 mins, 60 mins and 120 mins post intervention medication. The boxes would be ticked depending if the patient meets the primary measure of outcome within the time frame provided. (NCT03639558)
Timeframe: 20, 40, 60 and 120 minutes post intervention treatment

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Calm or tranquil at 20 minutesCalm or tranquil at 40 minutesCalm or tranquil at 60 minutesCalm or tranquil at 120 minutes
Haloperidol + Promethazine14253535
Haloperidol + Promethazine + Chlorpromazine18414547

[back to top]

Time Noted Where Important Adverse Effects Occurred Post Intervention

If patient exhibits any adverse effects post intervention treatment, this will be noted within the time frames. (NCT03639558)
Timeframe: 20, 40, 60 and 120 minutes post intervention treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Haloperidol + Promethazine + Chlorpromazine0
Haloperidol + Promethazine0

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0)

Here is the number of participants with serious and/or non-serious adverse events assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0). A non-serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence. A serious adverse event is an adverse event or suspected adverse reaction that results in death, a life-threatening adverse drug experience, hospitalization, disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect or important medical events that jeopardize the patient or subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the previous outcomes mentioned. (NCT03805932)
Timeframe: Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately 11 months and 13 days for the first group, and 4 months and 3 days for the second group.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Moxetumomab - Dose Escalation 30 mcg/kg3
Moxetumomab - Dose Expansion 40 mcg/kg15

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT)

Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) is defined as all treatment related Grade 3-5 adverse events (AEs) occurring from the initiation of moxetumomab pasudotox-tdfk therapy to within 30 days after the last dose of moxetumomab pasudotox-tdfk treatment. Adverse events were assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0). Grade 3 is severe, Grade 4 is life-threatening, and Grade 5 is death related to adverse event. (NCT03805932)
Timeframe: From the initiation of moxetumomab pasudotox-tdfk therapy to within 30 days after the last dose

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Moxetumomab - Dose Escalation 30 mcg/kg0
Moxetumomab - Dose Expansion 40 mcg/kg0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Whose Cancer Shrinks or Disappears After Treatment

Number of participants whose cancer shrinks or disappears after treatment defined as minimal residual disease. MRD is no hairy cell leukemia (HCL) in the blood and bone marrow aspirate flow determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and flow cytometry of blood and bone marrow aspirate. (NCT03805932)
Timeframe: 28-42 days after day 1 of the last treatment.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Moxetumomab - Dose Escalation 30 mcg/kg2
Moxetumomab - Dose Expansion 40 mcg/kg11

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Are Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Free

MRD-free is defined as participants with no hairy cell leukemia (HCL) in the blood and bone marrow aspirate flow determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and flow cytometry of blood and bone marrow aspirate. (NCT03805932)
Timeframe: 28-42 days after day 1 of the last treatment.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Moxetumomab - Dose Escalation 30 mcg/kg2
Moxetumomab - Dose Expansion 40 mcg/kg11

[back to top] [back to top]

Patient Sedation Scores at 1 Hour and 2 Hours Post-injection of Antihistamine (IV Cetirizine HCl or IV Diphenhydramine) and at Discharge.

Patient sedation scores at 1 hour and 2 hours post-injection of antihistamine (IV cetirizine HCl or IV diphenhydramine) and at discharge. The patient sedation scores are assessed on a scale of 0-4, with 0=None and 4=Extremely Severe (Asleep, Cannot Self-Rate). The HCP sedation scores are assessed on a scale of 0-4, with 0=None and 4=Extremely severe. (NCT04189588)
Timeframe: 1 hour, 2 Hours and at discharge

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
1 Hour2 HourDischarge
Cohort A0.50.60.1
Cohort B1.30.90.4

[back to top]

Number of Hypersensitivity Reactions to Treatment With an Anti-CD20 Antibody or Paclitaxel

"Compare the number of patients experiencing any infusion reaction events, and the number and percentage of patients experiencing each symptom of infusion reactions (flushing, itching, alterations in heart rate and blood pressure, dyspnea, chest discomfort, acute back or abdominal pain, fever, shaking chills, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, skin rashes, throat tightening, hypoxia, seizures, dizziness, or syncope) to treatment with anti-CD20 such as Rituxan® (rituximab) or Paclitaxel after premedication with intravenous (IV) QUZYTTIR™ cetirizine hydrochloride (HCl) or IV diphenhydramine during first-cycle infusion or re-treatment after 6 months or in patients with persistent infusion reactions while on maintenance with anti-CD20 such as Rituxan® (rituximab) or Paclitaxel.~The infusion reactions will be evaluated following the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 5.0) definitions of graded infusion reactions." (NCT04189588)
Timeframe: During and after anti-CD20 agent or paclitaxel infusion, at 1 and 2 hours after the antihistamine injection, at time of discharge, and up through 1 Month post injection of antihistamine (intervention).

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort A2
Cohort B3

[back to top]

"Time From Injection to Readiness for Discharge"

"Describe the distribution of the amount of time spent in the treatment center prior to discharge (time from injection to Readiness for Discharge)." (NCT04189588)
Timeframe: Time to discharge from infusion center

InterventionHours (Mean)
Cohort A4.3
Cohort B4.7

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Target cPRA

Target calculated panel reactive antibodies (cPRA) was defined as the reduction of cPRA required to achieve at least 100% increase of likelihood of compatible donor (LCD). Number of participants who achieved target cPRA was assessed using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) calculator during the specified timepoint were reported in this outcome measure. Participants who retained their target cPRA values were censored at the date of the last available laboratory assessment achieving their target cPRA. (NCT04294459)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until study cut-off date (maximum duration: up to 97.7 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort A: Participants With cPRA >=99.90%4
Cohort B: Participants With cPRA 80.00% to 99.89%2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Graft Survival at 6 Months Post-Transplant

Number of participants with graft survival status as functioning at 6-months post-transplant was reported in this outcome measure. (NCT04294459)
Timeframe: At 6 Months post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort A: Participants With cPRA >=99.90%1
Cohort B: Participants With Calculated Panel Reactive Antibodies (cPRA) 80.00% to 99.89%0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Response

Response was defined as the percentage of participants meeting at least one of the predefined desensitization efficacy criteria as measured by single antigen bead (SAB) assay as follows: reduction in cPRA resulting in at least 100% increase of likelihood of finding a compatible donor; reduction in antibody titer (>=75% reduction from Baseline) to achieve target cPRA; elimination of >=1 human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody (i.e., mean fluorescence intensity [MFI] reduced to <2000) as measured by a SAB assay, for antibodies with Baseline MFI >=3000. (NCT04294459)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until end of follow-up period (maximum duration: up to 39.1 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort A: Participants With cPRA >=99.90%83.3
Cohort B: Participants With cPRA 80.00% to 99.89%81.8

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameters: Concentration Observed at the End of First Intravenous Infusion (Ceoi) of Isatuximab

Ceoi is the plasma concentration observed at the end of intravenous infusion of isatuximab. (NCT04294459)
Timeframe: At End of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1

Interventionmicrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL) (Mean)
Cohort A: Participants With cPRA >=99.90%290
Cohort B: Participants With cPRA 80.00% to 99.89%270

[back to top]

PK Parameters: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 168 Hours Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-168 Hours) After First Infusion of Isatuximab

AUC0-168 hours was defined as the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to 168 hours post dose calculated using trapezoidal method after first infusion of isatuximab. (NCT04294459)
Timeframe: At Start of infusion (SOI), End of infusion (EOI), EOI+4H (initial protocol) EOI+1H (amended protocol), 72H and 168H on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionmicrograms*hours/milliliter (mcg*h/mL) (Mean)
Cohort A: Participants With cPRA >=99.90%29400
Cohort B: Participants With cPRA 80.00% to 99.89%20000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily had to have a causal relationship with the treatment. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the TEAE period (defined as the time from the first dose of study drug until study cut-off date). (NCT04294459)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until study cut-off date (maximum duration: up to 97.7 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TEAEsTESAEs
Cohort A: Participants With cPRA >=99.90%30
Cohort B: Participants With cPRA 80.00% to 99.89%40

[back to top]

PK Parameters: Maximum Concentration Observed (Cmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab

Cmax was defined as the maximum concentration observed after the first administration calculated using the noncompartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of isatuximab. (NCT04294459)
Timeframe: At Start of infusion (SOI), End of infusion (EOI), EOI+4H (initial protocol) EOI+1H (amended protocol), 72H and 168H on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionmcg/mL (Mean)
Cohort A: Participants With cPRA >=99.90%295
Cohort B: Participants With cPRA 80.00% to 99.89%285

[back to top]

PK Parameters: Time of Clast (Tlast) After First Infusion of Isatuximab

Tlast was defined as the time of last concentration observed above the lower limit of quantification, calculated using the non-compartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of isatuximab. (NCT04294459)
Timeframe: At Start of infusion (SOI), End of infusion (EOI), EOI+4H (initial protocol) EOI+1H (amended protocol), 72H and 168H on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionhours (Median)
Cohort A: Participants With cPRA >=99.90%166.00
Cohort B: Participants With cPRA 80.00% to 99.89%167.00

[back to top]

PK Parameters: Time Taken to Reach Cmax (Tmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab

Tmax was defined as the time to reach Cmax, calculated using the non-compartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of isatuximab. (NCT04294459)
Timeframe: At Start of infusion (SOI), End of infusion (EOI), EOI+4H (initial protocol) EOI+1H (amended protocol), 72H and 168H on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionhours (Median)
Cohort A: Participants With cPRA >=99.90%3.67
Cohort B: Participants With cPRA 80.00% to 99.89%3.40

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities

Abnormal renal parameters assessed were creatinine increased and estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR). The renal function abnormality grades were based on NCI-CTCAE, Version 5.0, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs. eGFR was assessed as per PCSA criteria: 60 (less than equal to) <= to less than (<) 90 milliliter/minute/1.73 meter square (mL/min/1.73m^2) (Mild), 30<= to <60 mL/min/1.73m^2 (Moderate), 15<=to <30 mL/min/1.73m^2 (Severe), <15 mL/min/1.73m^2 (End Stage Renal Disease). (NCT04294459)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until study cut-off date (maximum duration: up to 97.7 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Creatinine increased: Grade 1Creatinine increased: Grade 2Creatinine increased: Grade 3Creatinine increased: Grade 4eGFR: 60<= - <90 mL/min/1.73m^2eGFR: 30<= - <60 mL/min/1.73m^2eGFR: 15<= - <30 mL/min/1.73m^2eGFR: <15 mL/min/1.73m^2
Cohort A: Participants With cPRA >=99.90%0011100012
Cohort B: Participants With cPRA 80.00% to 99.89%003800011

[back to top]

PK Parameters: Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Isatuximab

Ctrough was the plasma concentration of isatuximab observed just before (pre-dose) treatment administration. (NCT04294459)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 Day 1

Interventionmcg/mL (Mean)
Cohort A: Participants With cPRA >=99.90%308
Cohort B: Participants With cPRA 80.00% to 99.89%246

[back to top]

Time to First Transplant Offer

Time to first transplant offer was defined as time (in days) from date of first study treatment dose up to date of first kidney transplant offer. Data on transplant status were collected and followed up until study cut-off date. (NCT04294459)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until study cut-off date (maximum duration: up to 97.7 weeks)

Interventiondays (Median)
Cohort A: Participants With cPRA >=99.90%373
Cohort B: Participants With cPRA 80.00% to 99.89%156

[back to top]

Time to Transplant

Time to transplant was defined as time (in days) from date of first study treatment dose up to date of kidney transplant. Data on transplant status were collected and followed up until study cut-off date. (NCT04294459)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until study cut-off date (maximum duration: up to 97.7 weeks)

Interventiondays (Median)
Cohort A: Participants With cPRA >=99.90%445
Cohort B: Participants With cPRA 80.00% to 99.89%259.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolytes Parameters

Abnormal electrolyte parameters assessed were hypernatremia, hyponatremia, hyperkalemia, hypokalemia, hypercalcemia, hypocalcemia, blood bicarbonate decreased, hypermagnesemia, hypomagnesemia and chloride. The abnormal grades were based on NCI-CTCAE, Version 5.0, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs. Chloride was estimated as per PCSA criteria: <80 millimoles per liter (mmol/L) and >115 mmol/L. (NCT04294459)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until study cut-off date (maximum duration: up to 97.7 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Hypernatremia: Grade 1Hypernatremia: Grade 2Hypernatremia: Grade 3Hypernatremia: Grade 4Hyponatremia: Grade 1Hyponatremia: Grade 2Hyponatremia: Grade 3Hyponatremia: Grade 4Hyperkalemia: Grade 1Hyperkalemia: Grade 2Hyperkalemia: Grade 3Hyperkalemia: Grade 4Hypokalemia: Grade 1Hypokalemia: Grade 2Hypokalemia: Grade 3Hypokalemia: Grade 4Hypercalcemia: Grade 1Hypercalcemia: Grade 2Hypercalcemia: Grade 3Hypercalcemia: Grade 4Hypocalcemia: Grade 1Hypocalcemia: Grade 2Hypocalcemia: Grade 3Hypocalcemia: Grade 4Hypermagnesemia: Grade 1Hypermagnesemia: Grade 2Hypermagnesemia: Grade 3Hypermagnesemia: Grade 4Hypomagnesemia: Grade 1Hypomagnesemia: Grade 2Hypomagnesemia: Grade 3Hypomagnesemia: Grade 4Chloride (PCSA): <80 mmol/LChloride (PCSA): >115 mmol/L
Cohort A: Participants With cPRA >=99.90%0000400023100001010060002000300000
Cohort B: Participants With cPRA 80.00% to 99.89%0000100061200000100052000000300000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Metabolism Parameters

Abnormal metabolism parameters assessed were hypoglycemia, hypoalbuminemia and glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c). The abnormal grades were based on NCI-CTCAE, Version 5.0, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs. HbA1c was estimated as per PCSA criteria: >8%. (NCT04294459)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until study cut-off date (maximum duration: up to 97.7 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Hypoglycemia: Grade 1Hypoglycemia: Grade 2Hypoglycemia: Grade 3Hypoglycemia: Grade 4Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 1Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 2Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 3Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 4
Cohort A: Participants With cPRA >=99.90%11003200
Cohort B: Participants With cPRA 80.00% to 99.89%20000200

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Isatuximab

ADA responses were categorized as treatment boosted ADA and treatment-induced ADA. Treatment boosted ADA was defined as pre-existing ADAs with a significant increase in the ADA titer during the study compared to the Baseline titer. Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA that developed at any time during the ADA on-study observation period in participants without pre-existing ADA. (NCT04294459)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until study cut-off date (maximum duration: up to 97.7 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment-induced ADATreatment boosted ADA
Cohort A: Participants With cPRA >=99.90%00
Cohort B: Participants With cPRA 80.00% to 99.89%00

[back to top]

PK Parameters: Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Clast) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab

Clast was defined as the last concentration of isatuximab observed above the lower limit of quantification calculated using non-compartmental analysis after the first infusion of isatuximab. (NCT04294459)
Timeframe: At Start of infusion (SOI), End of infusion (EOI), EOI+4H (initial protocol) EOI+1H (amended protocol), 72H and 168H on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionmcg/mL (Mean)
Cohort A: Participants With cPRA >=99.90%104
Cohort B: Participants With cPRA 80.00% to 99.89%76.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Anti-Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)-Antibody Reduction

Number of participants with anti-HLA-antibody (Baseline MFI >=3000) reduced to <2000 as measured using a SAB assay per central laboratory assessment was reported in this outcome measure. Participants were categorized in various categories of number of antibodies which were reduced as: none, 1-5, >5-10, >10-15, and >15. If multiple visits had the same number of total anti-HLA antibody reduction, the last visit data was summarized. (NCT04294459)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until end of follow-up period (maximum duration: up to 39.1 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
None1-5 antibodies>5-10 antibodies>10-15 antibodies>15 antibodies
Cohort A: Participants With cPRA >=99.90%24411
Cohort B: Participants With cPRA 80.00% to 99.89%24401

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities

Abnormal hematological parameters assessed were anemia, platelet count decreased, neutrophil count decreased, lymphocyte count decreased and monocytes. The hematological abnormality grades were based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Version 5.0, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs. Monocytes were assessed as per potentially clinically significant abnormality (PCSA) criteria defined as: greater than (>) 0.7*10^9/L. (NCT04294459)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until study cut-off date (maximum duration: up to 97.7 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Anemia: Grade 1Anemia: Grade 2Anemia: Grade 3Anemia: Grade 4Platelet count decreased: Grade 1Platelet count decreased: Grade 2Platelet count decreased: Grade 3Platelet count decreased: Grade 4Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 1Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 2Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 3Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 4Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 1Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 2Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 3Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 4Monocytes (PCSA) > 0.7*10^9/L
Cohort A: Participants With cPRA >=99.90%63002000000041103
Cohort B: Participants With cPRA 80.00% to 99.89%82006000000021003

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Liver Function Abnormalities

Abnormal liver function parameters assessed were Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increased, Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) increased, Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) increased, and Total bilirubin (TB) increased. The abnormal grades were based on NCI-CTCAE, Version 5.0, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs. (NCT04294459)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until study cut-off date (maximum duration: up to 97.7 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ALT increased: Grade 1ALT increased: Grade 2ALT increased: Grade 3ALT increased: Grade 4AST increased: Grade 1AST increased: Grade 2AST increased: Grade 3AST increased: Grade 4ALP increased: Grade 1ALP increased: Grade 2ALP increased: Grade 3ALP increased: Grade 4TB increased: Grade 1TB increased: Grade 2TB increased: Grade 3TB increased: Grade 4
Cohort A: Participants With cPRA >=99.90%1000100030000000
Cohort B: Participants With cPRA 80.00% to 99.89%1000000020000000

[back to top]

Duration for Achieving Target cPRA

Duration of achieving target cPRA was defined as the time (in weeks) from laboratory sample collection date of achieving target cPRA (defined as the reduction of cPRA required to achieve at least 100% increase of LCD) the first time up to the laboratory sample collection date when no longer achieving target cPRA calculated using OPTN calculator or the date of death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. The duration of achieving target cPRA was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT04294459)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until study cut-off date (maximum duration: up to 97.7 weeks)

Interventionweeks (Median)
Cohort A: Participants With cPRA >=99.90%NA
Cohort B: Participants With cPRA 80.00% to 99.89%7.29

[back to top]

Number of Kidney Transplant Offers

Number of kidney transplants offers received for each participant was reported in the outcome measure. Data on transplant offers were collected and followed up until study cut-off date. (NCT04294459)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until study cut-off date (maximum duration: up to 97.7 weeks)

Interventiontransplant offers (Number)
Cohort A: Participants With cPRA >=99.90%3
Cohort B: Participants With cPRA 80.00% to 99.89%3

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR)

Duration of response (DOR) was defined as time (in weeks) from laboratory sample collection date used in determining a participant to be a responder (defined as participants meeting at least one of the predefined desensitization efficacy criteria: reduction in cPRA resulting in at least 100% increase of likelihood of finding a compatible donor; reduction in antibody titer [>=75% reduction from Baseline] to achieve target cPRA; elimination of >=1 anti-HLA antibody i.e. MFI reduced to <2000 as measured by a SAB assay, for antibodies with Baseline MFI >=3000) up to the laboratory sample collection date when participant was confirmed as no longer meeting any response criterion (i.e., non-responder) or the date of death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. DOR was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT04294459)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until end of follow-up period (maximum duration: up to 39.1 weeks)

Interventionweeks (Median)
Cohort A: Participants With cPRA >=99.90%NA
Cohort B: Participants With cPRA 80.00% to 99.89%NA

[back to top]

Number of Participants Positive for Anti-rHuPH20 Antibodies

Reported here is the number of participants who had a positive anti-rHuPH20 antibody assay result at baseline or post-baseline. The post-baseline results are divided in treatment-enhanced anti-rHuPH20 antibodies and treatment-induced anti-rHuPH20 antibodies. Treatment-enhanced anti-rHuPH20 antibodies are participants with a positive anti-rHuPH20 antibody result at baseline who had one or more post-baseline titer results that was at least 0.60 titer unit greater than the baseline titer result. Treatment-induced anti-rHuPH20 antibodies include participants with negative or missing baseline anti-rHuPH20 antibody result(s) and at least one positive post-baseline anti-rHuPH20 antibody result. (NCT04660799)
Timeframe: From baseline up to 6 months after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 1 year)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BaselinePost-baseline: Treatment-enhancedPost-baseline: Treatment-induced
Rituximab SC+CHOP211

[back to top]

Number of Participants Positive for Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Rituximab

Reported here is the number of participants who had a positive ADA assay result at baseline or post-baseline. The post-baseline results are divided in treatment-enhanced ADAs and treatment-induced ADAs. Treatment-enhanced ADAs are participants with a positive ADA result at baseline who had one or more post-baseline titer results that was at least 0.60 titer unit greater than the baseline titer result. Treatment-induced ADAs include participants with negative or missing baseline ADA result(s) and at least one positive post-baseline ADA result. (NCT04660799)
Timeframe: From baseline up to 6 months after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 1 year)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BaselinePost-baseline: Treatment-enhancedPost-baseline: Treatment-induced
Rituximab IV+CHOP211
Rituximab SC+CHOP101

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Rituximab

(NCT04660799)
Timeframe: At Cycles 2 and 7 (one cycle=21 days): pre-dose, within 15 minutes of end of infusion, 24 hours post-dose, Days 3, 7, 15, 21, up to 21 weeks

,
Interventionmicrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 2Cycle 7
Rituximab IV+CHOP200255
Rituximab SC+CHOP144228

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Rituximab

AUC is the area under the serum concentration curve over the dosing interval of 21 days during Cycle 2 and Cycle 7. (NCT04660799)
Timeframe: During Cycles 2 and 7 (one cycle=21 days): pre-dose, within 15 minutes of end of infusion, 24 hours post-dose, Days 3, 7, 15, 21, up to 21 weeks

,
Interventionday*mcg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 2Cycle 7
Rituximab IV+CHOP17303050
Rituximab SC+CHOP21303810

[back to top]

Subcutaneous Serum Rituximab Trough Concentration (Ctrough SC) and Intravenous Serum Rituximab Trough Concentration (Ctrough IV)

For this pharmacokinetics (PK) primary outcome measure the serum rituximab Ctrough for SC and IV administrations were measured at Cycle 7, 21 days after study treatment administration for Cycle 7 (pre-dose of Cycle 8). Geometric mean ratio and 90% confidence interval were estimated based on an ANCOVA model adjusted for tumor load at baseline and are reported in the statistical analysis. (NCT04660799)
Timeframe: At Cycle 7 (one cycle=21 days), 21 days after study treatment administration, up to 21 weeks

Interventionmicrograms/milliliter (mcg/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Rituximab IV+CHOP90.7
Rituximab SC+CHOP137.4

[back to top]

Observed SC and IV Rituximab Area Under the Curve (AUCsc and AUCiv)

The area under the curve (AUC) for serum rituximab concentration versus time after dosage was measured for SC and IV administrations during Cycle 7. Geometric mean ratio and 90% confidence interval were estimated based on an ANCOVA model adjusted for tumor load at baseline and are reported in the statistical analysis. (NCT04660799)
Timeframe: During Cycle 7 (one cycle=21 days): pre-dose, within 15 minutes of end of infusion, 24 hours post-dose, Days 3, 7, 15, 21, up to 21 weeks

Interventionday*mcg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Rituximab IV+CHOP3050.7
Rituximab SC+CHOP3806.7

[back to top] [back to top]

CRR, as Determined by IRC Using International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) 1999 Guidelines

CRR was assessed according to the IWG Response Criteria for NHL 1999 guidelines and included CR and CR unconfirmed (CRu). CR was defined as complete disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms, regression of lymph nodes to normal size, absence of splenomegaly, and absence of bone marrow involvement. CRu was defined as disappearance of clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and absence of splenomegaly, with regression of lymph nodes by > 75 % but still >1.5 cm in size, and indeterminate bone marrow assessment. (NCT04660799)
Timeframe: 6-8 weeks after the last dose of study treatment or 4-8 weeks after last dose of study treatment for early discontinuation (up to approximately 32 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Rituximab IV+CHOP58.3
Rituximab SC+CHOP65.4

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate (CRR) as Determined by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) Using Lugano Response Criteria (LRC) for Malignant Lymphoma

Per LRC, CR based on positron emission tomography- computed tomography (PET-CT) was defined as complete metabolic response (MR) in lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites with a score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without residual mass, on 5-point scale (5PS), where, 1= no uptake above background; 2 = uptake ≤ mediastinum; 3 = uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver; 4 = uptake moderately > liver; 5 = uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions; no new lesions and no evidence of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid disease in bone marrow. Per LRC, CR based on CT was defined as complete radiologic response in lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites with target nodes/nodal masses regressing to ≤ 1.5 centimeters (cm) in longest transverse diameter (LDi) and no extralymphatic sites of disease; absence of non-measured lesion; organ enlargement regressing to normal; no new lesions; normal bone marrow by morphology, if indeterminate, immunohistochemistry (IHC) negative. (NCT04660799)
Timeframe: 6-8 weeks after the last dose of study treatment or 4-8 weeks after last dose of study treatment for early discontinuation (up to approximately 32 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Rituximab IV+CHOP62.5
Rituximab SC+CHOP80.8

[back to top]

Trough Serum Concentration (Ctrough) of Rituximab

Ctrough was measured at Cycle 2 and Cycle 7, 21 days after study treatment administration for each cycle (pre-dose of Cycle 3 and Cycle 8, respectively). (NCT04660799)
Timeframe: At Cycles 2 and 7 (one cycle=21 days), 21 days after study treatment administration, up to 21 weeks

,
Interventionmcg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 2Cycle 7
Rituximab IV+CHOP43.290.7
Rituximab SC+CHOP63.5137

[back to top]

Time to Cmax (Tmax) of Rituximab

(NCT04660799)
Timeframe: At Cycles 2 and 7 (one cycle=21 days): pre-dose, within 15 minutes of end of infusion, 24 hours post-dose, Days 3, 7, 15, 21, up to 21 weeks

,
Interventionday (Median)
Cycle 2Cycle 7
Rituximab IV+CHOP0.140.16
Rituximab SC+CHOP5.421.99

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR), Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR), as Determined by Investigator and IRC Using Lugano Response Criteria (LRC) for Malignant Lymphoma

ORR=CR+PR. Per LRC: CR by PET-CT: complete MR in lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites with a score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without residual mass; no new lesions, no FDG-avid disease in bone marrow; CR by CT: complete radiologic response in lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites with target nodes/nodal masses regressing to ≤ 1.5 cm in LDi, no extralymphatic disease; absence of non-measured lesion; organ enlargement regressing to normal; no new lesions; normal bone marrow; PR by PET-CT: partial MR in lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites with a score of 4 or 5 with reduced uptake compared with baseline + residual masses of any size; no new lesions, residual uptake higher than in normal bone marrow but reduced compared with baseline; PR by CT: ≥ 50% decrease in sum of the product of the perpendicular diameters (SPD) of up to 6 target nodes and extranodal sites; non-measured lesion absent/normal, regressed, but no increase; spleen regressed by >50 % in length beyond normal; no new lesions. (NCT04660799)
Timeframe: 6-8 weeks after the last dose of study treatment or 4-8 weeks after last dose of study treatment for early discontinuation (up to approximately 32 weeks)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
InvestigatorIRC
Rituximab IV+CHOP70.866.7
Rituximab SC+CHOP88.580.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. New disease, exacerbation of existing disease, recurrence of an intermittent medical condition not present at baseline, any deterioration in a laboratory value or other clinical test associated with symptoms or leading to a change in study/concomitant treatment or discontinuation from study drug as well as events related to protocol-mandated interventions are considered AEs. SAEs: any event that met any of these criteria: fatal, life-threatening, required or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect, medically significant or required intervention to prevent any of the outcomes listed here. (NCT04660799)
Timeframe: AEs were reported up to 28 days after the last dose (up to approximately 7 months), and SAEs were reported up to 6 months after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 1 year)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AEsSAEs
Rituximab IV+CHOP2411
Rituximab SC+CHOP268

[back to top]

CRR, as Determined by the Investigator Using Lugano Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma

Per LRC, CR based on PET-CT was defined as complete metabolic response (MR) in lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites with a score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without residual mass, on 5-point scale (5PS), where, 1= no uptake above background; 2 = uptake ≤ mediastinum; 3 = uptake > mediastinum but ≤ liver; 4 = uptake moderately > liver; 5 = uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions; no new lesions and no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. Per LRC, CR based on CT was defined as complete radiologic response in lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites with target nodes/nodal masses regressing to ≤ 1.5 centimeters (cm) in longest transverse diameter (LDi) and no extralymphatic sites of disease; absence of non-measured lesion; organ enlargement regressing to normal; no new lesions; normal bone marrow by morphology, if indeterminate, IHC negative. (NCT04660799)
Timeframe: 6-8 weeks after the last dose of study treatment or 4-8 weeks after last dose of study treatment for early discontinuation (up to approximately 32 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Rituximab IV+CHOP58.3
Rituximab SC+CHOP76.9

[back to top]