Page last updated: 2024-12-07

imatinib mesylate

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

imatinib methanesulfonate : A methanesulfonate (mesylate) salt that is the monomesylate salt of imatinib. Used for treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia and gastrointestinal stromal tumours. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID123596
CHEMBL ID1642
CHEBI ID31690
SCHEMBL ID8217
MeSH IDM0391958

Synonyms (133)

Synonym
AC-525
HY-50946
imatinib (mesylate)
HMS3394B09
gleevec
glivec
cgp 57148b
220127-57-1
nsc716051
4-(4-methyl-piperazin-1-ylmethyl)-n-[4-methyl-3-(4-pyridin- 3-yl)-pyrimidin-2-ylamino)-phenyl]-benzamidemethanesulfonic acid salt
ggp-57148b
qti-571
cgp-57148
hsdb 7142
benzamide, 4-((4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)methyl)-n-(4-methyl-3-((4-(3-pyridinyl)-2-pyrimidinyl)amino)phenyl)-, monomethanesulfonate
sti-571
smr000469175
MLS001401456
NCGC00159456-02
imatinib mesylate ,
sti 571
benzamide,monomethanesulfonate
imatinib mesilate
nsc-716051
gleevac
imatinib, methanesulfonate salt
D01441
gleevec (tn)
glivec (tn)
imatinib mesilate (jan)
imatinib mesylate (usan)
cgp57148b
imatinib methanesulfonate
imatinib methansulfonate
4-[(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)methyl]-n-{4-methyl-3-[(4-pyridin-3-ylpyrimidin-2-yl)amino]phenyl}benzamide methanesulfonate
imatinib monomesylate
CHEBI:31690 ,
4-[(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)methyl]-n-(4-methyl-3-{[4-(pyridin-3-yl)pyrimidin-2-yl]amino}phenyl)benzamide methanesulfonate
HMS2052B09
111GE005
methanesulfonic acid; 4-[(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)methyl]-n-[4-methyl-3-[(4-pyridin-3-ylpyrimidin-2-yl)amino]phenyl]benzamide
EC-000.2338
imatinib (as mesilate)
qti571
imatinib accord
imatinib methane sulfonate
CHEMBL1642
imatinib medac
cas-220127-57-1
tox21_111684
dtxcid7020502
dtxsid9040502 ,
A815828
methanesulfonic acid; 4-[(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)methyl]-n-[4-methyl-3-[[4-(3-pyridinyl)-2-pyrimidinyl]amino]phenyl]benzamide
4-[(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)methyl]-n-[4-methyl-3-[[4-(3-pyridinyl)-2-pyrimidinyl]amino]phenyl]-benzamide monomethanesulfonate
cgp-57148b
HMS2233D16
CCG-101175
BCP9000776
imatinib monomethanesulfonate
8a1o1m485b ,
unii-8a1o1m485b
imatinib mesylate [usan]
nsc 716051
shantinib
HMS3265F02
HMS3265F01
HMS3265E01
HMS3265E02
BCPP000204
imatinib mesylate,gleevec,glivec,cgp-57148b,sti-571
FT-0601612
imatinib mesylate [hsdb]
imatinib mesilate [who-dd]
imatinib mesylate [orange book]
imatinib mesylate [vandf]
imatinib mesilate [jan]
imatinib methanesulfonate [mi]
imatinib mesilate [mart.]
benzamide, 4-((4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)methyl)-n-(4-methyl-3-((4-(3-pyridinyl)-2-pyrimidinyl)aminophenyl)-, methanesulphonate salt
benzamide, 4-((4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)methyl)-n-(4-methyl-3-((4-(3-pyridinyl)-2-pyrimidinyl)aminophenyl)-, methanesulfonate salt
imatinib mesilate [ep monograph]
n-(4-methyl-3-(4-(pyridin-3-yl)pyrimidin-2-ylamino)phenyl)-4-((4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)methyl)benzamide methanesulfonate
;4-[(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)methyl]-n-[4-methyl-3-[(4-pyridin-3-ylpyrimidin-2-yl)amino]phenyl]benzamide methanesulfonate
S1026
AKOS015852497
benzamide, 4-[(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)methyl]-n-[4-methyl-3-[[4-(3-pyridinyl)-2-pyrimidinyl]amino]phenyl]-, methanesulfonate (1:1)
AM20080900
HMS3372O12
YLMAHDNUQAMNNX-UHFFFAOYSA-N
4-[(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)-methyl]-n-{4-methyl-3-[[4-(3-pyridinyl)-2-pyrimidinyl]-amino]-phenyl}-benzamide monomethanesulphonate
NC00425
SCHEMBL8217
tox21_111684_1
NCGC00159456-11
KS-1236
mfcd04307699
4-[(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)methyl]-n-[4-methyl-3-[[4-(3-pyridinyl)-2-pyrimidinyl]amino]-phenyl]benzamide methanesulfonate
Q-201232
gleevec (imatinib mesylate)
n-(4-methyl-3-((4-(pyridin-3-yl)pyrimidin-2-yl)amino)phenyl)-4-((4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)methyl)benzamide methanesulfonate
I0936
imatinib mesylate (sti571)
imatinibmesylate
J-523068
methanesulfonate, imatinib
mesylate, imatinib
EX-A954
st-1571 mesylate
HMS3654C07
4-[(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)methyl]-n-[4-methyl-3-[[4-(3-pyridinyl)-2-pyrimidinyl]amino]phenyl]benzamide methanesulfonate
SY013513
SW197805-4
imatinib(free base)
220127-57-1 (mesylate)
Q27114666
BCP01255
4-(4-methylpiperazin-1-ylmethyl)-n-[4-methyl-3-(4-pyridin-3-yl-pyrimidin-2-ylamino)phenyl]benzamide methanesulfonic acid salt
A846640
imatinib methanesulfonate salt
M06311
genfatinib
n-(4-methyl-3-((4-(pyridin-3-yl)pyrimidin-2-yl)amino)phenyl)-4-((4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)methyl)benzamidemethanesulfonate
hydron;methanesulfonate;4-[(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)methyl]-n-[4-methyl-3-[(4-pyridin-3-ylpyrimidin-2-yl)amino]phenyl]benzamide
imatinib mesylate (cgp-57148b, sti-571)
BI164678
c29h31n7o.ch4o3s
HB1943
4-((4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)methyl)-n-(4-methyl-3-((4-pyridin-3-ylpyrimidin-2-yl)amino)phenyl)benzamide methanesulfonate
4-((4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)methyl)-n-(4-methyl-3-((4-(3-pyridinyl)-2-pyrimidinyl)amino)phenyl)benzamide monomethanesulfonate
imatinib mesilate (ep monograph)
imatinib mesylate400 mg
imatinib mesilate (mart.)

Research Excerpts

Overview

Imatinib mesylate (IM) is a first-line treatment option for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) IM is expected to alleviate inflammation by inhibiting discoidin domain receptor 1 activity. Imatinib Mesylate is a molecularly targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor drug.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Imatinib mesylate is a potent tyrosine kinase inhibitor that may induce immunological effects, such as inhibition of immune suppressive cells; but, how it modulates the immune system remains to be completely elucidated. "( Imatinib Mesylate Exerted Antitumor Effect by Promoting Infiltration of Effector T Cells in Tumor.
Aoki, K; Henmi, M; Hirata, A; Mizoguchi, Y; Narumi, K; Sawai, E; Shibasaki, C, 2022
)
3.61
"Imatinib mesylate is a novel ophthalmic formulation of imatinib mesylate, which is expected to alleviate inflammation by inhibiting the discoidin domain receptor 1 activity."( Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple topical ophthalmic administration of imatinib mesylate in healthy subjects.
Chung, JY; Huh, KY; Hyon, JY; Koo, HC; Lee, JH; Na, JY; You, JC; Yu, KS, 2022
)
1.66
"Imatinib mesylate is a first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor. "( Occupational allergic contact dermatitis to Piperamido Nitrotoluene in pharmaceutical workers: A case series.
Bourke, JF; Hollywood, A, 2022
)
2.16
"Imatinib mesylate (IM) is a reliable first line treatment for chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). "( Association of
Alimirzoyeva, Z; Asadov, C; Bayramov, B; Hasanova, A; Karimova, N; Shirinova, A, 2023
)
2.35
"Imatinib mesylate (IM) is a first-line treatment option for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). "( Cost effectiveness of therapeutic drug monitoring for imatinib administration in chronic myeloid leukemia.
Bernard, PS; Kim, K; McMillin, GA; Schmidt, RL; Tantravahi, S; Walker, BS, 2019
)
1.96
"Imatinib mesylate is a well-known tyrosine kinase inhibitor used to treat chronic myeloid leukemia, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, as well as a variety of other malignancies."( Hyperpigmentation due to imatinib: A rare case of cutaneous involvement.
Hakim, N; Rehman, H; Saif, MW; Seetharamu, N; Sugarman, R, 2020
)
2
"Imatinib mesylate is a molecularly targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor drug. "( Aberrant DNA methylation at HOXA4 and HOXA5 genes are associated with resistance to imatinib mesylate among chronic myeloid leukemia patients.
Ankathil, R; Azlan, H; Baba, AA; Elias, MH; Sulong, S, 2018
)
2.15
"Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used as a first-line medication in the management of oncohematological conditions such as chronic myeloid leukemia and gastrointestinal stromal tumors."( The blue palate-A case series of imatinib-related oral pigmentation and literature review.
Carrozzo, M; Donnell, CC; Walton, RL, 2021
)
1.34
"Imatinib mesylate (IM) is an anticancer drug that belongs to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. "( Deregulation of whole-transcriptome gene expression in zebrafish (Danio rerio) after chronic exposure to low doses of imatinib mesylate in a complete life cycle study.
Baebler, Š; Bakos, K; Csenki, Z; Filipič, M; Gajski, G; Garaj-Vrhovac, V; Gazsi, G; Gerić, M; Horváth, Á; Kovács, R; Novak, M; Rotter, A; Žegura, B, 2021
)
2.27
"Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine-kinase inhibitor mainly used in the treatment of blood cancers, frequently in multidrug therapy with cyclophosphamide."( Spectroscopic studies of simultaneous binding of cyclophosphamide and imatinib mesylate to human holo-transferrin.
Śliwińska-Hill, U, 2021
)
1.58
"Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used in the treatment of a variety of oncological conditions. "( Imatinib-induced eruptive nevi.
Abbas, O; Hamie, L; Sawaya, RT, 2021
)
2.06
"Imatinib mesylate is an effective treatment for chronic myelogenous leukemia and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. "( Sab mediates mitochondrial dysfunction involved in imatinib mesylate-induced cardiotoxicity.
Chambers, JW; Chambers, TP; Gomez, D; Santiesteban, L, 2017
)
2.15
"Imatinib mesylate (imatinib) is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor initially approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2001 for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). "( Imatinib mesylate-induced lichenoid drug eruption.
Chung, HJ; Keller, M; Penn, EH, 2017
)
3.34
"Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used in the treatment of oncological conditions, including chronic myeloid leukemia and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. "( A case series of imatinib-induced generalized hypopigmentation and progression of existing acquired dermal melanocytosis.
Chen, Q; Chua, SH; Kok, WL; Lee, SSJ; Ng, SK, 2017
)
1.9
"Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine-kinase inhibitor used as the first-line treatment in chronic myeloid leukemia patients, but it is also indicated for other hematological diseases and solid tumors. "( Imatinib-induced diffuse hyperpigmentation of the oral mucosa, the skin, and the nails in a patient affected by chronic myeloid leukemia: report of a case and review of the literature.
Di Tullio, F; Mandel, VD; Padalino, C; Pellacani, G; Scotti, R, 2018
)
1.92
"Imatinib mesylate (IM) is an anti-neoplasic drug used for the treatment of cancer. "( Characterization of imatinib mesylate formulations distributed in South American countries: Determination of genotoxic impurities by UHPLC-MS/MS and dissolution profile.
Comparsi Wagner, S; Dillenburg, TL; Linden, R; Venzon Antunes, M; Verza, SG; Wolff, FC, 2018
)
2.25
"Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used in the treatment of several malignancies. "( Cystic acne due to imatinib therapy for chronic myelocytic leukemia.
Dasanu, CA; Del Rosario, M; Hwang, A; Iskandar, A, 2019
)
1.96
"Imatinib mesylate is an anti‑neoplastic targeted chemotherapeutic agent, which can inhibit tyrosine kinase receptors, including BCR‑ABL, platelet‑derived growth factor receptors (PDGFRs) and c‑Kit. "( Antiproliferative effects of imatinib mesylate on ZR‑75‑1 and MDA‑MB‑231 cell lines via PDGFR‑β, PDGF‑BB, c‑Kit and SCF expression.
Aditya, A; Akbari Javar, H; Davoudi, ET; Ibrahim Noordin, M; Kadivar, A; Kamalidehghan, B; Sedghi, R, 2018
)
2.21
"Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that binds to the Abelson tyrosine kinase and related proteins."( Effect of imatinib on plasma glucose concentration in subjects with chronic myeloid leukemia and gastrointestinal stromal tumor.
Aguayo-González, Á; Avila-Rojo, JA; Baquerizo-Burgos, JE; Coronel, MFC; Cuevas-Ramos, D; Gomez-Perez, FJ; Gómez-Sámano, MÁ; Gulias-Herrero, A; Molina-Botello, D; Palacios-Báez, L; Villanueva-Martinez, F; Wong-Campoverde, BD; Zentella-Dehesa, A, 2018
)
1.2
"Imatinib mesylate (imatinib) is a classic tyrosine kinase inhibitor used to treat chronic myeloid leukemia. "( Imatinib-induced irreversible interstitial lung disease: A case report.
Huang, J; Jin, F; Ouyang, G; Pan, J; Zhang, P, 2019
)
1.96
"Imatinib mesylate is an anticancer agent that inhibits competitively several receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs)."( Imatinib mesylate does not counteract ovarian tissue fibrosis in postnatal rat ovary.
Asadi-Azarbaijani, B; Braber, S; Jahnukainen, K; Oskam, I; Santos, R; van Duursen, M, 2019
)
2.68
"Imatinib mesylate is a selective inhibitor of this tyrosine kinase."( Mutations Associated with Imatinib Mesylate Resistance - Review.
Goranova-Marinova, VS; Ivanov, HJ; Ivanova, H; Linev, AJ; Stoyanova, VK; Zhelyazkov, IG, 2018
)
1.5
"Imatinib mesylate is a potent inhibitor of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) and its activity has been tested in preclinical models and in Phase I and II clinical trials."( Imatinib and prostate cancer: lessons learned from targeting the platelet-derived growth factor receptor.
Mathew, P; Rosenberg, A, 2013
)
1.11
"Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets the BCR-ABL, c-kit, and PDGF (platelet-derived growth factor) receptors. "( Adverse skin effects of imatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor.
Ormaechea-Pérez, N; Pretel-Irazabal, M; Tuneu-Valls, A, 2014
)
1.85
"Imatinib mesylate is a selective protein tyrosine kinase inhibitor, which can inhibit BCR/Abl, PDGF-R, c-KIT, c-fms, TCR/Abl, Lck, FLT-3 and MAPKs activities on various cell types. "( Imatinib mesylate: an innovation in treatment of autoimmune diseases.
Azizi, G; Mirshafiey, A, 2013
)
3.28
"Imatinib mesylate (IM) is a potent and specific tyrosine inhibitor and has been reported to inhibit mesenchymal cell proliferation in pulmonary fibrosis. "( Effects of imatinib mesylate on pulmonary allergic vasculitis in a murine model.
Nagashima, H; Nakamura, Y; Sasaki, N; Sawai, T; Suzuki, N; Utsumi, Y; Yamashita, M; Yamauchi, K, 2013
)
2.22
"Imatinib mesylate is a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor used in the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia. "( Imatinib-induced postoperative periorbital purpura: GASP (Gleevec-Associated Surgical Purpura) in a woman with imatinib-treated chronic myelogenous leukemia.
Anzalone, CL; Cohen, PR; Cortes, JE; Kurzrock, R, 2014
)
1.85
"Imatinib mesylate is a specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor that may block the platelet-derived growth factor and transforming growth factor pathways. "( Imatinib mesylate attenuates myocardial remodeling through inhibition of platelet-derived growth factor and transforming growth factor activation in a rat model of hypertension.
Chang, K; Choo, EH; Ihm, SH; Jang, SW; Kim, HY; Kim, OR; Park, CS; Seung, KB, 2014
)
3.29
"Imatinib mesylate is a selective protein tyrosine kinase inhibitor with immunomodulatory properties that abrogates multiple signal transduction pathways in immune cells."( Effects of imatinib mesylate in mouse models of multiple sclerosis and in vitro determinants.
Azizi, G; Haidari, MR; Javanbakht, MH; Khorramizadeh, M; Mirshafiey, A; Naddafi, F; Sadria, R; Sedaghat, R; Tofighi Zavareh, F, 2014
)
1.51
"Imatinib mesylate is an inhibitor of kinase tyrosine that has proved to be useful in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia."( [Molecular response with triple therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia].
López-Arroyo, JL; Portillo-García, ML; Rico-Ramos, HJ,
)
0.85
"Imatinib mesylate is a selective tyrosine-kinase inhibitor used in the treatment of multiple cancers, most notably chronic myelogenous leukemia. "( Imatinib activates pathological hypertrophy by altering myocyte calcium regulation.
Barr, LA; Berretta, RM; Force, T; Gao, H; Houser, SR; Kubo, H; Makarewich, CA; Recchia, F; Troupes, CD; Woitek, F, 2014
)
1.85
"Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that specifically targets the BCR-ABL protein and induces hematological remission in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)."( Silencing of suppressor of cytokine signaling-3 due to methylation results in phosphorylation of STAT3 in imatinib resistant BCR-ABL positive chronic myeloid leukemia cells.
Al-Jamal, HA; Asan, JM; Hassan, R; Johan, MF; Jusoh, SA; Yong, AC, 2014
)
1.12
"Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with selectivity for abelson tyrosine-protein kinase 1 (c-Abl), breakpoint cluster region (Bcr)-Abl fusion protein (Bcr-Abl), mast/stem cell growth factor receptor Kit (c-Kit), and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR). "( Exposure of neuroblastoma cell lines to imatinib results in the upregulation of the CDK inhibitor p27(KIP1) as a consequence of c-Abl inhibition.
Buccinnà, B; Lupino, E; Piccinini, M; Ramondetti, C, 2014
)
1.85
"Imatinib mesylate is a multikinase inhibitor of several signaling pathways implicated in skin fibrosis with in vitro antifibrotic activity."( Imatinib mesylate for the treatment of steroid-refractory sclerotic-type cutaneous chronic graft-versus-host disease.
Baird, K; Booher, S; Comis, LE; Cowen, EW; Figg, WD; Flanders, KC; Hakim, FT; Joe, GO; Mitchell, SA; Pavletic, SZ; Rose, JJ; Sarantopoulos, S; Steinberg, SM; Takebe, N; Yao, L, 2015
)
2.58
"Imatinib mesylate is a chemotherapeutic drug that inhibits the tyrosine kinase activity of c-KIT and has been successfully used to treat leukemias and some solid tumors. "( Paradoxical and contradictory effects of imatinib in two cell line models of hormone-refractory prostate cancer.
Cardoso, HJ; Correia, S; Figueira, MI; Maia, CJ; Marques, R; Socorro, S; Vaz, CV, 2015
)
1.86
"Imatinib mesylate (IM) is a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. "( Bioequivalence of a single 400-mg dose of imatinib 100-mg oral tablets and a 400-mg tablet in healthy adult Korean volunteers.
Gwon, MR; Kim, HJ; Kim, W; Lee, HW; Lee, J; Lim, MS; Lim, SM; Park, SM; Seong, SJ; Yang, DH; Yoon, YR, 2015
)
1.86
"Imatinib mesylate is a competitive inhibitor of BCR/ ABL tyrosine kinase and inhibits also several receptor tyrosin kinases. "( [Potential clinical benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring of imatinib in oncology].
Demlová, R; Juřica, J; Turjap, M, 2015
)
1.86
"Imatinib mesylate is an antineoplastic agent which has high absorption in the upper part of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). "( Formulation and in vitro, in vivo evaluation of effervescent floating sustained-release imatinib mesylate tablet.
Chung, LY; Davoudi, ET; Javar, HA; Kadivar, A; Kamalidehghan, B; Noordin, MI; Sabeti, B; Zaharuddin, ND, 2015
)
2.08
"Imatinib mesylate is a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKi) designed to target c-ABL and BCR-ABL, approved for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. "( Possible Role of Interleukin-31/33 Axis in Imatinib Mesylate-Associated Skin Toxicity.
Allegra, A; Alonci, A; Calapai, G; Gangemi, S; Maisano, V; Mannucci, C; Musolino, C; Russo, S, 2015
)
2.12
"Imatinib mesylate (IM) is a frontline treatment in the early chronic phase of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). "( miR-101 sensitizes K562 cell line to imatinib through Jak2 downregulation and inhibition of NF-κB target genes.
Farhadi, E; Rezvani, MR; Safa, M; Zaker, F, 2016
)
1.88
"Imatinib mesylate (IM) is a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor and is approved for indefinite treatment of pediatric chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). "( Adverse effects of imatinib in children with chronic myelogenous leukemia.
Charoenkwan, P; Choeyprasert, W; Natesirinilkul, R; Wejaphikul, K; Yansomdet, T, 2017
)
1.9
"Imatinib mesylate (Imt) is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor mainly used in the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia (Ph+CML). "( Interaction of imatinib mesylate with human serum transferrin: The comparative spectroscopic studies.
Śliwińska-Hill, U, 2017
)
2.25
"Imatinib mesylate is an anti-cancer agent that competitively inhibits several receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). "( Developmental effects of imatinib mesylate on follicle assembly and early activation of primordial follicle pool in postnatal rat ovary.
Asadi-Azarbaijani, B; Braber, S; Jahnukainen, K; Nurmio, M; Oskam, IC; Santos, RR; Saugstad, OD; Toppari, J; van Duursen, MBM, 2017
)
2.2
"Imatinib mesylate (IM) is a first-line treatment for chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) as a specific inhibitor of BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase. "( Suppression of carboxylesterases by imatinib mediated by the down-regulation of pregnane X receptor.
Fan, H; Liu, C; Luo, W; Xi, T; Xin, Y; Xiong, J; Zhang, F; Zhao, X, 2017
)
1.9
"Imatinib mesylate is a selective inhibitor of receptor tyrosine kinase, including PDGFR-β and c-Kit."( Antiproliferation effect of imatinib mesylate on MCF7, T-47D tumorigenic and MCF 10A nontumorigenic breast cell lines via PDGFR-β, PDGF-BB, c-Kit and SCF genes.
Akbari Javar, H; Kadivar, A; Kamalidehghan, B; Karimi, B; Noordin, MI; Sedghi, R, 2017
)
1.47
"Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used as first line treatment in chronic myeloid leukemia and gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients. "( Development of hypogammaglobulinemia in patients treated with imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia or gastrointestinal stromal tumor.
Alfieri, P; Arcari, A; Ferrari, A; Leonardi, G; Longo, G; Luppi, G; Maffei, R; Marasca, R; Martinelli, S; Piacentini, F; Santachiara, R; Torelli, G; Trabacchi, E; Vallisa, D, 2008
)
1.79
"Imatinib mesylate is a small molecule targeted at dysregulated protein-tyrosine kinase. "( Effect of tyrosine kinase inhibition by imatinib mesylate on mast cell tumors in dogs.
Bonkobara, M; Fujino, Y; Fujita, M; Ishida, N; Isotani, M; Kato, R; Kobayashi, T; Ochi, S; Ono, K; Setoguchi, A; Tamura, K; Tominaga, M; Washizu, T; Yagihara, H,
)
1.84
"Imatinib mesylate (IM) is a new drug which has been shown to induce complete hematological remission in 55% and complete cytogenetic response in 22% of the patients with CML in blast crisis."( Prophylaxis of central nervous system leukemia: a case of chronic myeloid leukemia with lymphoid blast crisis treated with imatinib mesylate.
Seth, R; Thavaraj, V, 2008
)
1.27
"Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting the platelet-derived growth factor (PDGFR-alpha and PDGFR-beta), the BCR-ABL, and c-KIT receptors."( Brief report: activity of imatinib in a patient with platelet-derived-growth-factor receptor positive malignant solitary fibrous tumor of the pleura.
Agostini, M; Colombo, P; de Braud, F; De Pas, T; Manzotti, M; Pelosi, G; Toffalorio, F; Trifirò, G; Vigna, PD, 2008
)
1.07
"Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitor targeted against PDGFR alpha and beta, c-kit and bcr-abl. "( Combination of imatinib and vinorelbine enhances cell growth inhibition in breast cancer cells via PDGFR beta signalling.
Bauer, M; Bauerschlag, DO; Jonat, W; Maass, N; Meinhold-Heerlein, I; Mundhenke, C; Schem, C; Weigel, MT, 2009
)
1.8
"Imatinib mesylate (imatinib) is a potent and selective inhibitor of the tyrosine kinases, Bcr-Abl, c-Kit and platelet-derived growth factor receptors (PDGFRs). "( Imatinib mesylate suppresses bone metastases of breast cancer by inhibiting osteoclasts through the blockade of c-Fms signals.
Hiraga, T; Nakamura, H, 2009
)
3.24
"Imatinib mesylate is a recently developed oral anticancer agent designed to selectively inhibit tyrosine kinases implicated in oncogenesis and it seems to represent a promising opportunity (also in first line) in the treatment of patients with advanced disease not candidate to prior surgery."( Control of aggressive fibromatosis by treatment with imatinib mesylate: a step forward?
Nicoletti, S; Papi, M; Ravaioli, A; Tamburini, E, 2009
)
1.32
"Imatinib mesylate is a potent, molecularly targeted therapy against the oncogenic tyrosine kinase BCR-ABL. "( Stat3 contributes to resistance toward BCR-ABL inhibitors in a bone marrow microenvironment model of drug resistance.
Bewry, NN; Boulware, D; Emmons, MF; Hazlehurst, LA; Nair, RR; Pinilla-Ibarz, J, 2008
)
1.79
"Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used to treat chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) throughout all the phases of the disease. "( Skin and oral lesions associated to imatinib mesylate therapy.
Basso, FG; Boer, CC; Cintra, ML; Corrêa, ME; da Silva Santos, P; de Magalhães, MH; de Souza, CA; Torrezan, M, 2009
)
2.07
"Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec(R)) is a small molecule with tyrosine kinase activity that has shown marked effects in some individuals with HES."( Atypical cardiac manifestation of hypereosinophilic syndrome and reversible cardiotoxicity to imatinib.
Bosch, X; Garcia-Albeniz, X; Garcia-Alvarez, A; Loma-Osorio, P; Sionis, A; Sitges, M, 2010
)
1.08
"Imatinib mesylate is a potent inhibitor of the Bcr-Abl, c-Kit, and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) tyrosine kinases. "( A phase II study of imatinib mesylate and capecitabine in metastatic breast cancer: Southwest Oncology Group Study 0338.
Albain, K; Barlow, WE; Chew, HK; Gown, A; Gralow, J; Hayes, DF; Hortobagyi, GN; Lew, D; Livingston, R, 2008
)
2.11
"Imatinib mesylate is a specific inhibitor of three tyrosine kinase receptors, two of which, PDGF-R and c-Kit, are implicated in the pathogenesis of intimal hyperplasia."( On the ability of imatinib mesylate to inhibit smooth muscle cell proliferation without delaying endothelialization: an in vitro study.
Laroche, G; Petitclerc, E; Vallières, K, 2009
)
1.41
"Imatinib mesylate is an inhibitor of tyrosine kinases and is used for the therapy of patients with tumors including leukemias, but is not effective as a monotherapy for malignant glioma."( Stage-specific effect of inhibition of autophagy on chemotherapy-induced cytotoxicity.
Akiyama, Y; Bögler, O; Fujiwara, K; Kondo, S; Moritake, K; Shingu, T; Shinojima, N; Tamada, Y; Yokoyama, T, 2009
)
1.07
"Imatinib mesylate is a small molecule that inhibits activation of the KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha proteins, and is effective in first-line treatment of metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour."( Adjuvant imatinib mesylate after resection of localised, primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Antonescu, CR; Ballman, KV; Blackstein, ME; Blanke, CD; Brennan, MF; Dematteo, RP; Demetri, GD; Maki, RG; McCarter, MD; Owzar, K; Patel, S; Pisters, PW; Polikoff, JA; Tan, BR; von Mehren, M, 2009
)
1.49
"Imatinib mesylate (IM) is a very important drug in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). "( Congestive heart failure during imatinib mesylate treatment.
Bolognese, L; Fiorentini, G; Grotti, S; Marinozzi, C; Montagnani, F; Turrisi, G, 2010
)
2.09
"Imatinib mesylate is a drug that has been approved for treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia, Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors. "( Imatinib mesylate-induced acute liver failure in a patient with gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Akyurek, N; Benekli, M; Buyukberber, S; Coskun, U; Demirci, U; Karakan, T; Tonyali, O; Yildiz, R, 2010
)
3.25
"Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) is a selective Bcr-Abl protein tyrosine-kinase inhibitor, and it also inhibits the receptor tyrosine kinases for stem cell factor (c-kit) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGFR). "( Development of lichen sclerosus et atrophicus while receiving a therapeutic dose of imatinib mesylate for chronic myelogenous leukemia.
Abuav, R; Goldenberg, G; High, W; Pass, C; Skupsky, H, 2010
)
2.03
"Imatinib mesylate is a targeted agent that may be used against Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), one of the highest risk pediatric ALL groups."( Improved early event-free survival with imatinib in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a children's oncology group study.
Aledo, A; Borowitz, MJ; Bowman, WP; Burden, L; Camitta, B; Carroll, A; Carroll, WL; Davies, SM; Devidas, M; Gaynon, PS; Heerema, NA; Hunger, SP; Jorstad, D; Rutledge, R; Sather, H; Schultz, KR; Slayton, WB; Trigg, M; Wang, C; Winick, N, 2009
)
1.8
"Imatinib mesylate (IM) is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor selective for BCR-ABL and indicated for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia. "( Effect of imatinib on the signal transduction cascade regulating telomerase activity in K562 (BCR-ABL-positive) cells sensitive and resistant to imatinib.
Bakhanashvili, M; Granot, G; Lahav, J; Lahav, M; Mor-Tzuntz, R; Raanani, P; Rabizadeh, E; Shpilberg, O; Uziel, O; Zimra, Y, 2010
)
1.8
"Imatinib mesylate is a rationally designed tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has revolutionized the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. "( Dysregulation of bone remodeling by imatinib mesylate.
Dewar, AL; Fitter, S; Hughes, TP; Vandyke, K; Zannettino, AC, 2010
)
2.08
"Imatinib mesylate is an inhibitor of c-kit and is indicated in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia and GISTs."( Disappearance of lentigines in a patient receiving imatinib treatment for familial gastrointestinal stromal tumor syndrome.
Campbell, T; Felsten, L; Moore, J, 2009
)
1.07
"Imatinib mesylate is a small molecule inhibitor that selectively inhibits the PDGF receptor kinase as well the cKIT and Abl kinases, among other targets. "( Evaluation of imatinib mesylate in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Chhina, MK; Grant, GM; Nargues, W; Nathan, SD, 2010
)
2.16
"Imatinib mesylate has proven to be an extremely effective and generally well tolerated drug, producing durable responses in most patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukaemia. "( Managing imatinib resistance in chronic myeloid leukaemia.
Hughes, T; Osborn, M, 2010
)
1.8
"Imatinib mesylate is a potent inhibitor of Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase, an oncoprotein that plays a key role in the development of chronic myeloid leukemia. "( Gaining insights into the Bcr-Abl activity-independent mechanisms of resistance to imatinib mesylate in KCL22 cells: a comparative proteomic approach.
Catanzano, F; Colavita, I; Esposito, N; Martinelli, R; Melo, JV; Pane, F; Ruoppolo, M; Salvatore, F, 2010
)
2.03
"Imatinib mesylate is a highly selective inhibitor of this kinase, producing normal blood-counts in 98% of patients in chronic phase CML and disappearance of the Philadelphia chromosome in 86%."( Second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors as therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia.
Alvarado, Y; Cortes, J; Giles, FJ; Swords, R, 2007
)
1.06
"Imatinib mesylate is a selective inhibitor of bcr-abl, PRGFR alpha, beta and c-kit."( In vitro effects of imatinib mesylate on radiosensitivity and chemosensitivity of breast cancer cells.
Bauer, M; Bauerschlag, DO; Dahmke, L; Jonat, W; Maass, N; Mundhenke, C; Niehoff, P; Schem, C; Strauss, A; Weber, K; Weigel, MT, 2010
)
1.41
"Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used in the management of disorders in which activation of c-Abl, PDGFR, or c-Kit signaling plays a critical role. "( Imatinib mesylate does not increase bone volume in vivo.
Browett, P; Callon, KE; Cornish, J; Gamble, GD; Grey, A; Karsdal, MA; Ladefoged, M; Naot, D; O'Sullivan, S; Watson, M, 2011
)
3.25
"Imatinib mesylate (Imatinib) is a potent inhibitor of defined tyrosine kinases and is effectively used for the treatment of malignancies characterized by the constitutive activation of these tyrosine kinases, such as Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph(+)) leukemias and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. "( Immunocompetent cell functions in Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients on prolonged Imatinib maintenance treatment.
Calabrese, E; De Propris, MS; Della Starza, I; Elia, L; Foà, R; Guarini, A; Intoppa, S; Maggio, R; Milani, ML; Peragine, N; Vitale, A, 2011
)
1.81
"Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor which targets Bcr-Abl-protein, c-Kit, and platelet-derived growth factor receptor. "( Oral pigmentation in the hard palate associated with imatinib mesylate therapy: a report of three cases.
Christerson, L; Halbritter, S; Mattsson, U; Mörner Serikoff, E; Warfvinge, G, 2011
)
2.06
"Imatinib mesylate is an effective treatment for recurrent or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), but secondary resistance has been reported. "( Surgical intervention for imatinib and sunitinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Kamiya, K; Kikuchi, H; Konno, H; Miyazaki, S; Ohta, M; Sakaguchi, T; Setoguchi, T; Yamamoto, M, 2011
)
1.81
"Imatinib mesylate is a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has been shown to selectively inhibit both the platelet-derived growth factor receptor and transforming growth factor-β signaling pathways."( A case of sclerodermatous graft-versus-host disease responsive to imatinib therapy.
Lazar, J; Poonawalla, T; Teng, JM,
)
0.85
"Imatinib mesylate is a first line treatment of Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia and of a rare form of gastrointestinal stromal cancer, where the response to the drug is also linked to the immune system activation with production of antineoplastic cytokines. "( Imatinib treatment induces CD5+ B lymphocytes and IgM natural antibodies with anti-leukemic reactivity in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia.
Catellani, S; Gobbi, M; Pierri, I; Poggi, A; Zocchi, MR, 2011
)
1.81
"Imatinib mesylate (IM) is a first-line treatment of chronic phase-chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML). "( Assessment of quality of life with imatinib mesylate as first-line treatment in chronic phase-chronic myeloid leukemia.
Aaqib, M; Akram, M; Aziz, Z; Iqbal, J; Saeed, A, 2011
)
2.09
"Imatinib mesylate (IM) is a compound that inhibits both BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase and c-kit receptors. "( Imatinib mesylate alters the expression of genes related to disease progression in an animal model of uveal melanoma.
Abourbih, D; Antecka, E; Burnier, MN; Castiglione, E; Di Cesare, S; Fernandes, BF; Isenberg, J; Maloney, S; Martins, C; Neto Belfort, R, 2011
)
3.25
"Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used as first line treatment in chronic myeloid leukaemia. "( α-defensin 1-3 and α-defensin 4 as predictive markers of imatinib resistance and relapse in CML patients.
Chollet, C; Costaglioli, P; Dupouy, M; Etienne, G; Garbay, B; Lagarde, V; Mahon, FX; Pasquet, JM; Reiffers, J; Turcq, B, 2011
)
1.81
"Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that was approved by the U.S. "( In vivo imaging of Bcr-Abl overexpressing tumors with a radiolabeled imatinib analog as an imaging surrogate for imatinib.
Glekas, AP; Khan, N; Larson, SM; Pillarsetty, NK; Punzalan, B; Smith-Jones, P, 2011
)
1.81
"Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec(®)) is a protein inhibitor used in the management of several hematological malignancies associated with dermatological side effects, like hyperpigmentation."( Imatinib-associated hyperpigmentation of the palate in post-HSCT patient.
Abreu, MH; Gomez, RS; Resende, RG; Silva, ME; Teixeira, RG; Vasconcelos, Fde O, 2012
)
1.1
"Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec) is a drug that potently counteracts diabetes both in humans and in animal models for human diabetes. "( Effects of Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec) on human islet NF-kappaB activation and chemokine production in vitro.
Li, T; Lu, T; Mokhtari, D; Welsh, N, 2011
)
2.2
"Imatinib mesylate is a drug that has been approved for treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and patients with leukemia such as chronic myeloid or Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic. "( Imatinib-associated bilateral gynecomastia and unilateral testicular hydrocele in male patient with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a literature review.
Barutca, S; Guney, E; Meydan, N; Sargin, G; Tanriverdi, O; Taskin, F; Unubol, M, 2012
)
1.82
"Imatinib mesylate (IM) is a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor used for treating chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). "( ABCB1 haplotype is associated with major molecular response in chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with standard-dose of imatinib.
Bueno, CT; Chiattone, CS; Guerra-Shinohara, EM; Hirata, MH; Hirata, RD; Lima, LT; Luchessi, AD; Vivona, D; Zanichelli, MA, 2012
)
1.82
"Imatinib mesylate (IM) is a phenylaminopyrimidine that represents the first-line treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), Philadelphia chromosome-positive. "( Photoinduced dermatitis and oral lichenoid reaction in a chronic myeloid leukemia patient treated with imatinib mesylate.
Borroni, G; Brazzelli, V; Fiandrino, G; Lucioni, M; Manna, G; Moggio, E; Muzio, F; Orlandi, E; Vassallo, C, 2012
)
2.04
"Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used as first-line treatment in Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (Ph+ CML) and metastatic or unresectable gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). "( The role of therapeutic drug monitoring of imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia and metastatic or unresectable gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Ensom, MH; Mabasa, VH; Teng, JF, 2012
)
1.82
"Imatinib mesylate is a receptor kinase inhibitor approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of malignant metastatic and/or unresectable gastrointestinal stromal tumors and chronic myelogenous leukemia. "( Gastric antral vascular ectasia in a patient with GIST after treatment with imatinib: case report and literature review.
Mourad, F; Saad Aldin, E; Tfayli, A, 2012
)
1.82
"Imatinib mesylate is a small molecule receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor indicated for treatment of chronic myelogenous leukaemia and GI stromal tumours."( Anti-fibrotic activity and enhanced interleukin-6 production by hepatic stellate cells in response to imatinib mesylate.
Albanis, E; Chou, HI; Fiel, MI; Friedman, SL; Khitrov, G; Kim, Y; Zhang, W, 2012
)
1.32
"Imatinib mesylate (IM) is a potent tyrosine kinase inhibitor used as front-line therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia, a disease caused by the oncogenic kinase Bcr-Abl. "( Quantitative- and phospho-proteomic analysis of the yeast response to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib to pharmacoproteomics-guided drug line extension.
Dos Santos, SC; Mira, NP; Moreira, AS; Sá-Correia, I, 2012
)
1.82
"Imatinib mesylate is a molecular targeted agent for treating chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and gastrointestinal stromal tumor. "( Hepatitis B virus reactivation in a chronic myeloid leukemia patient treated with imatinib mesylate.
Cui, GH; Gowrea, B; Hu, Y; Li, M; Wang, YD; Xia, J, 2012
)
2.05
"Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) is a chemotherapy medication developed to treat chronic myelogenous leukemia as well as gastrointestinal stromal tumors (Savage, N Engl J Med 2002;346:683-93). "( Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) induced unilateral optic disc edema.
DeLuca, C; Haskes, C; Shenouda-Awad, N; Wrzesinski, S, 2012
)
3.26
"Imatinib mesylate is a potent inhibitor of platelet-derived growth factor and transforming growth factor-β signalling pathways which may play a role in systemic sclerosis (SSc)-associated skin changes."( Imatinib mesylate in scleroderma-associated diffuse skin fibrosis: a phase II multicentre randomized double-blinded controlled trial.
Barcat, D; Bouchet, S; Chatelus, E; Chene, G; de Korwin-Krokowski, JD; Diot, E; Doussau, A; Durant, C; Ezzedine, K; Grandoulier, AS; Hachulla, E; Kostrzewa, E; Lepreux, S; Mahon, FX; Paul, C; Prey, S; Quemeneur, T; Schaeverbeke, T; Seneschal, J; Solanilla, A; Sparsa, A; Taïeb, A, 2012
)
3.26
"Imatinib mesylate is an oral agent that is a selective protein tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the KIT protein tyrosine kinase, and it has demonstrated clinical benefit and objective tumor responses in most GIST patients in phase II and III trials."( Is exon mutation analysis needed for adjuvant treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor?
Akinci, MB; Aksoy, S; Ozdemir, NY; Sendur, MA; Uncu, D; Zengin, N, 2013
)
1.11
"Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used widely as the first-line treatment for chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). "( Imatinib-induced Stevens-Johnsons syndrome.
Himanshu, D; Jain, N; Jha, P; Singh, AK, 2013
)
1.83
"Imatinib mesylate is an orally administered selective inhibitor of certain tyrosine kinases including KIT."( Management of malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumours.
Demetri, G; Dimitrijevic, S; Fletcher, C; Joensuu, H; Roberts, P; Silberman, S, 2002
)
1.04
"Imatinib mesylate is a selective Bcr-Abl kinase inhibitor, effective in the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia. "( Several Bcr-Abl kinase domain mutants associated with imatinib mesylate resistance remain sensitive to imatinib.
Corbin, AS; Deininger, MW; Druker, BJ; La Rosée, P; Stoffregen, EP, 2003
)
2.01
"Imatinib mesylate (STI571) is a highly effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), but information on its efficacy and tolerance in intensively pretreated patients is scarce. "( Imatinib mesylate (STI571) treatment in patients with chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukaemia previously submitted to autologous stem cell transplantation.
Camós, M; Cervantes, F; del Campo, R; García-Conde, J; Hernández-Boluda, JC; Martínez-Climent, JA; Montserrat, E; Odriozola, J; Villalón, L, 2003
)
3.2
"Imatinib mesylate (imatinib) is an orally administered competitive inhibitor of the tyrosine kinases associated with the KIT protein (stem cell factor receptor), ABL protein and platelet-derived growth factor receptors. "( Imatinib mesylate: in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumours.
Croom, KF; Perry, CM, 2003
)
3.2
"Imatinib mesylate (Glivec) is a selective inhibitor of bcr-abl tyrosine kinase, the product of the Philadelphia chromosome, which is the hallmark of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). "( Successful peripheral blood stem cell mobilisation with filgrastim in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia achieving complete cytogenetic response with imatinib, without increasing disease burden as measured by quantitative real-time PCR.
Branford, S; Goh, KY; Grigg, A; Hoyt, R; Hughes, TP; Hui, CH; Kwan, YL; Ma, DD; Rudzki, B; Seymour, JF; To, LB; Trickett, A; Walsh, S; White, D, 2003
)
1.76
"Imatinib mesylate is a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of c-abl, bcr/abl, c-kit, and platelet-derived growth factor-receptor (PDGF-R). "( Results of imatinib mesylate therapy in patients with refractory or recurrent acute myeloid leukemia, high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome, and myeloproliferative disorders.
Albitar, M; Cortes, J; Faderl, S; Garcia-Manero, G; Giles, F; Kantarjian, H; Letvak, L; O'Brien, S; Rios, MB; Salvado, A; Talpaz, M; Thomas, D, 2003
)
2.15
"Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with high affinity for the BCR-ABL fusion protein expressed by the hematopoietic cells in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). "( The effect of dose increase of imatinib mesylate in patients with chronic or accelerated phase chronic myelogenous leukemia with inadequate hematologic or cytogenetic response to initial treatment.
Brandt, H; Mohamed, AN; Pemberton, P; Schiffer, CA; Zonder, JA, 2003
)
2.05
"Imatinib mesylate (STI571) is a major therapeutic advance for the management of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), however, a proportion of patients are refractory to it, particularly those in more advanced phases of CML. "( ABL-kinase domain point mutation as a cause of imatinib (STI571) resistance in CML patient who progress to myeloid blast crisis.
Czekalska, S; Czopek, J; Hanfstein, B; Hochhaus, A; Jakóbczyk, M; Müller, MC; Rudzki, Z; Sacha, T; Salamanchuk, Z; Skotnicki, AB; Wolska-Smoleń, T, 2003
)
1.76
"Imatinib mesylate is a 2-phenylaminopyrimidine tyrosine kinase inhibitor with specific activity for ABL, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and c-kit receptor. "( [Molecular-target therapy of Ph-positive leukemia by imatinib (tyrosine kinase inhibitor)].
Ohyashiki, K; Tauchi, T, 2003
)
1.76
"Imatinib mesylate is an inhibitor of Bcr/Abl tyrosine kinase, which essentially participates the pathogenesis of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). "( [Imatinib].
Urabe, A, 2003
)
1.76
"Imatinib mesylate is a targeted agent for CML with efficacy to date, which is superior to all other nontransplant therapy and has limited toxicity."( Transplantation for chronic myelogenous leukemia: yes, no, maybe so. . . An Oregon perspective.
Mauro, MJ; Maziarz, RT, 2003
)
1.04
"Imatinib mesylate is an inhibitor of a few tyrosine kinases including KIT, which is an important growth factor receptor of mast cells."( Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with imatinib mesylate: clinical improvement in three refractory cases.
Eklund, KK; Joensuu, H, 2003
)
2.03
"Imatinib mesylate is a specific inhibitor of the Bcr-Abl kinase and has shown promising results in clinical studies."( Phosphorylation of tyrosine 393 in the kinase domain of Bcr-Abl influences the sensitivity towards imatinib in vivo.
Bai, RY; Duyster, J; Grundler, R; Hoepfl, J; Miething, C; Mugler, C; Peschel, C, 2003
)
1.04
"Imatinib mesylate (STI571) is a competitive Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor and has yielded encouraging results in treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) and gastrointestinal stroma tumors (GISTs). "( Imatinib mesylate affects the development and function of dendritic cells generated from CD34+ peripheral blood progenitor cells.
Appel, S; Boehmler, AM; Brossart, P; Brümmendorf, TH; Grünebach, F; Hartmann, U; Kanz, L; Müller, MR; Reichardt, VL; Rupf, A; Weck, MM, 2004
)
3.21
"Imatinib mesylate is a selective inhibitor of tyrosine kinase-mediated activity."( Surgical treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the imatinib (STI-571) era.
Hart, J; Langerman, A; Posner, MC; Ryan, CW; Swiger, S; Wu, PC, 2003
)
1.04
"Imatinib mesylate (STI571) is a selective inhibitor of the bcr/abl tyrosine kinase with therapeutic potential in the blast crisis (BC) of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML)."( Imatinib mesylate as treatment for blastic transformation of Philadelphia chromosome positive chronic myelogenous leukemia.
Carrasco, M; Conde, E; de Miguel, M; Díaz-Mediavilla, J; Martínez, JA; Sanz, MA; Sierra, J; Sureda, A, 2003
)
3.2
"Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets the BCR-ABL protein in CML, c-kit (KIT) and platelet-derived growth factor receptors. "( Imatinib mesylate causes hypopigmentation in the skin.
Cortes, J; Kantarjian, H; O'Brien, S; Talpaz, M; Tsao, AS, 2003
)
3.2
"Imatinib mesylate (STI571) is a very effective treatment option for Ph(+) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase. "( CNS blast crisis of chronic myelogenous leukemia in a patient with a major cytogenetic response in bone marrow associated with low levels of imatinib mesylate and its N-desmethylated metabolite in cerebral spinal fluid.
Bornhauser, M; Ehninger, G; Freiberg-Richter, J; Jenke, A; Mohr, B; Radke, J; Schleyer, E; Schuler, US, 2004
)
1.97
"Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) is a specific inhibitor of KIT kinase activation, and in phase II clinical trials has proven to be remarkably efficacious in heavily pretreated GIST patients with advanced disease."( Imatinib mesylate: a molecularly targeted therapy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Eisenberg, BL, 2003
)
2.48
"Imatinib mesylate is a specific inhibitor of protein tyrosine kinase activity secondary to bcr-abl, mostly indicated for the treatment of patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). "( First case of immune-mediated haemolytic anaemia associated to imatinib mesylate.
Chamone, Dde A; Conchon, M; Dorlhiac-Llacer, PE; Fonseca, GH; Novaretti, MC, 2003
)
2
"Imatinib mesylate is a potent, selective inhibitor of the tyrosine kinase activity of bcr-abl,which is now established as the state-of-the-art treatment for chronic, accelerated or even blastic phase of Philadelphia-positive [Ph(1)(+)] chronic myelogenous leukemia. "( Ida-FLAG plus imatinib mesylate-induced molecular remission in a patient with chemoresistant Ph1+ acute myeloid leukemia.
Giakoumi, X; Mantzouranis, M; Pangalis, GA; Vassilakopoulos, TP; Viniou, NA, 2004
)
2.13
"Imatinib mesylate is an orally available tyrosine kinase inhibitor that specifically blocks Bcr-Abl function."( Innovations in the management of leukemia: role of biologic therapies.
Duffy, KM, 2003
)
1.04
"Imatinib mesylate is a new drug that can inhibit the tyrosine kinase activity of Bcr-Abl, the receptors for platelet-derived growth factor receptor(PDGF) and stem cell factor, or c-kit. "( [Molecular targeted treatment--new treatment strategy for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia].
Usui, N, 2004
)
1.77
"Imatinib mesylate is a drug with curative potential and can be used as a first line drug in the management of CML, however at present the cure rate is unknown."( Hematologic and cytogenetic findings in eleven chronic myelogenous leukemia patients treated with imatinib mesylate at a tertiary care hospital.
Adil, SN; Arain, S; Kakepoto, GN; Khurshid, M; Sajid, R; Usman, M, 2004
)
1.98
"Imatinib mesylate is a selective inhibitor of a few tyrosine kinases including KIT, and it is the first effective treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). "( Serum KIT and KIT ligand levels in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with imatinib.
Blanke, CD; Bono, P; Demetri, GD; Dimitrijevic, S; Heinrich, MC; Joensuu, H; Krause, A; von Mehren, M, 2004
)
1.77
"Imatinib mesylate is a valuable therapy for patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ chronic-phase CML. "( Spotlight on imatinib mesylate in chronic myeloid leukemia.
Croom, KF; Curran, MP; Goa, KL, 2004
)
2.14
"Imatinib mesylate is a small molecule drug that in vitro inhibits the Abelson (Abl), Arg (abl-related gene), stem cell factor receptor (Kit), and platelet-derived growth factor receptor A and B (PDGFRA and PDGFRB) tyrosine kinases. "( Imatinib targets other than bcr/abl and their clinical relevance in myeloid disorders.
Pardanani, A; Tefferi, A, 2004
)
1.77
"Imatinib mesylate is a potent inhibitor of KIT tyrosine kinase, so we explored the possibility that ACC could be a potential target for this drug."( Imatinib mesylate as treatment for adenoid cystic carcinoma of the salivary glands: report of two successfully treated cases.
Alcedo, JC; Arosemena, JR; Fábrega, JM; Urrutia, A, 2004
)
2.49
"Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta (PDGFRB), BCR-ABL, and KIT."( Imatinib mesylate in chordoma.
Bertieri, R; Bertulli, R; Casali, PG; Colecchia, M; Crippa, F; Fumagalli, E; Greco, A; Gronchi, A; Grosso, F; Messina, A; Olmi, P; Orlandi, R; Pierotti, MA; Pilotti, S; Ripamonti, C; Spreafico, C; Stacchiotti, S; Tamborini, E, 2004
)
2.49
"Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that specifically targets c-Kit, Abl, and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR). "( Expression of imatinib mesylate-targeted kinases in endometrial carcinoma.
Broaddus, RR; Burke, TW; Gershenson, DM; Lu, KH; Oh, JC; Ramondetta, LM; Schmandt, R; Slomovitz, BM; Wu, W, 2004
)
2.13
"Imatinib mesylate is a relatively new drug that targets the BCR-ABL chimeric protein, the molecular basis of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). "( Efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate for patients in the first chronic phase of chronic myeloid leukemia: results of a Japanese phase II clinical study.
Bessho, M; Chiba, S; Emi, N; Fujimoto, M; Hirai, H; Hirano, M; Jinnai, I; Kawai, Y; Mizoguchi, H; Morishima, Y; Nakao, S; Nishimura, M; Ogura, M; Ohnishi, K; Ohno, R; Shimazaki, C; Taguchi, H; Takahashi, M; Tauchi, T; Urabe, A; Yazaki, F; Yokozawa, T, 2004
)
2.08
"Imatinib mesylate is a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is successfully used in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemias and gastrointestinal stromal tumours. "( Pharmacokinetic resistance to imatinib mesylate: role of the ABC drug pumps ABCG2 (BCRP) and ABCB1 (MDR1) in the oral bioavailability of imatinib.
Burger, H; Nooter, K, 2004
)
2.05
"Imatinib mesylate is a targeted therapy for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)."( Cost-utility analysis of imatinib mesylate for the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia in the chronic phase.
Gordois, A; Scuffham, P; Ward, S; Warren, E, 2004
)
2.07
"Imatinib mesylate is a molecular-targeted agent, shown to be effective in chronic myeloid leukemia and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). "( Some lessons learned from imatinib mesylate clinical development in gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Bertulli, R; Casali, PG; Coco, P; Fumagalli, E; Grosso, F; Stacchiotti, S, 2004
)
2.07
"Imatinib mesylate is a selective and potent small-molecule inhibitor of tyrosine kinases, including Kit, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and the BCR-Abl fusion protein. "( Imatinib mesylate in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumour.
McAuliffe, JC; Steinert, DM; Trent, JC, 2005
)
3.21
"Imatinib mesylate is a small molecule inhibitor of the c-Abl, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptor and c-Kit tyrosine kinases that is approved for the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. "( Imatinib mesylate radiosensitizes human glioblastoma cells through inhibition of platelet-derived growth factor receptor.
Appelt, C; Dörken, B; Hildebrandt, B; Holdhoff, M; Jordan, A; Kreuzer, KA; le Coutre, P; Na, IK; Riess, H; Schmidt, CA; Scholz, R; Van Etten, RA,
)
3.02
"Imatinib mesylate is a potent and specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor against c-ABL, BCR-ABL, and c-KIT, and has been demonstrated to be highly active in chronic myeloid leukemia and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. "( Imatinib as a novel antifibrotic agent in bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice.
Aono, Y; Inayama, M; Izumi, K; Kishi, J; Nishioka, Y; Sone, S; Uehara, H; Ugai, M, 2005
)
1.77
"Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor initially developed against the bcr-abl fusion protein of CML, but also shows therapeutic inhibitory activity against c-Kit expressed in GISTs."( Expression of c-kit (CD117) in neuroendocrine tumours--a target for therapy?
Caplin, ME; Dhillon, AP; Hochhauser, D; Khan, K; Kostoula, V; Quaglia, A; Savage, K; Stubbs, M, 2005
)
1.05
"Imatinib mesylate is a potent inhibitor of Abl, KIT, and PDGFR tyrosine kinases. "( A phase II trial of imatinib mesylate monotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
D'Andrea, G; Dickler, M; Hudis, CA; Menell, J; Moasser, M; Modi, S; Moynahan, ME; Norton, L; Panageas, KS; Seidman, AD; Tan, LK, 2005
)
2.09
"Imatinib mesylate is a recently introduced KIT tyrosine kinase inhibitor with effect on metastatic GIST."( [Treatment of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumour with imatinib mesylate].
Eide, J; Haugland, HK; Horn, A; Jebsen, NL; Jensen, DK; Lilleng, PK; Mannelqvist, M; Monge, OR; Skar, R; Øvrebø, K, 2005
)
1.29
"Imatinib mesylate is a novel anti-tumor agent useful in the clinical management of chronic myelogenous leukemia and gastrointestinal stromal tumors with minimal toxicity relative to other forms of cancer therapy. "( Cyclooxygenase-2 induction and prostaglandin E2 accumulation in squamous cell carcinoma as a consequence of epidermal growth factor receptor activation by imatinib mesylate.
Donato, NJ; Johnson, FM; Newman, RA; Yang, P, 2004
)
1.96
"Imatinib mesylate is a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor used for the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) leukemia and other malignancies. "( Telomere length and telomerase activity in the BCR-ABL-transformed murine Pro-B cell line BaF3 is unaffected by treatment with imatinib.
Balabanov, S; Bokemeyer, C; Brümmendorf, TH; Duyster, J; Fellenberg, J; Hartmann, U; Kanz, L; Lipp, HP; van der Kuip, H; Ziegler, P, 2005
)
1.77
"Imatinib mesylate is an oral drug designed to inhibit the kinase enzyme activity of KIT."( Nursing implications of imatinib as molecularly targeted therapy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Amand, MS; Demetri, GD; Griffin, JM, 2005
)
1.05
"Imatinib mesylate (IM) is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, which inhibits phosphorylation of downstream proteins involved in BCR-ABL signal transduction. "( Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) downregulates telomerase activity and inhibits proliferation in telomerase-expressing cell lines.
Bakhanashvili, M; Beery, E; Birenbaum, M; Fenig, E; Lahav, M; Luria, D; Nordenberg, J; Reshef, H; Sandbank, J; Uziel, O; Yerushalmi, R, 2005
)
3.21
"Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the ABL, platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), and c-kit kinases. "( Induction of heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor and activation of EGF receptor in imatinib mesylate-treated squamous carcinoma cells.
Donato, NJ; Johnson, FM; Saigal, B, 2005
)
1.99
"Imatinib mesylate is a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is successfully used in the treatment of Philadelphia-positive chronic and acute leukaemia's, and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. "( Chronic imatinib mesylate exposure leads to reduced intracellular drug accumulation by induction of the ABCG2 (BCRP) and ABCB1 (MDR1) drug transport pumps.
Brok, M; Burger, H; de Boeck, G; de Bruijn, EA; Guetens, G; Nooter, K; Sparreboom, A; van Tol, H; Verweij, J; Wiemer, EA, 2005
)
2.21
"Imatinib mesylate is a novel molecule, which inhibits the protein product of this fusion gene and hence has been used in the treatment of CML."( Imatinib mesylate in chronic myeloid leukemia: a prospective, single arm, non-randomized study.
Amare-Kadam, P; Baisane, C; Bakshi, A; Deshmukh, C; Parikh, P; Saikia, T, 2005
)
2.49
"Imatinib mesylate (STI571) is an oral 2-phenylaminopyrimidine derivative that acts as a selective inhibitor against several receptor tyrosine kinases and has been viewed as one of the therapeutic success stories of the 21st century. "( Molecular research directions in the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Godwin, AK; Tarn, C, 2005
)
1.77
"Imatinib mesylate is a selective Bcr/Abl kinase inhibitor and an effective anticancer agent for Bcr/Abl-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia. "( Detection of single nucleotide insertion of BCR/ABL region in imatinib-resistant human myelogenous leukemia SR-1 cells.
Han, HY; Han, JY; Jeong, JS; Kim, HJ; Kwak, JY; Kwon, HC; Park, JI; Park, TH; Seo, C, 2005
)
1.77
"Imatinib mesylate is a protein tyrosine kinase inhibitor that inhibits the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase, the receptor tyrosine kinases for platelet-derived growth factor, and stem cell factor c-kit. "( Acute renal failure secondary to imatinib mesylate treatment in prostate cancer.
Finkel, KW; Foringer, JR; Guntupalli, JS; Samuels, JA; Tjia, VM; Verani, RR, 2005
)
2.05
"Imatinib mesylate is a specific inhibitor of BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase, which is now widely used for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with a high efficacy. "( Severe hepatic injury caused by imatinib mesylate administered for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia and the efficacy of prednisolone for its management.
Ikuta, K; Inamura, J; Jimbo, J; Kohgo, Y; Miyokawa, N; Sato, K; Shindo, M; Tokusashi, Y; Torimoto, Y, 2005
)
2.05
"Imatinib mesylate is a major advance in the therapy of patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). "( Targeting the kinase activity of the BCR-ABL fusion protein in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Cortes, JE; Giles, FJ; Kantarjian, HM, 2005
)
1.77
"Imatinib mesylate is a potent inhibitor of BCR-ABL, the constitutively active tyrosine kinase protein critical for the pathogenesis of chronic myeloid leukemia."( Comparison between patients with Philadelphia-positive chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia who obtained a complete cytogenetic response within 1 year of imatinib therapy and those who achieved such a response after 12 months of treatment.
Abruzzese, E; Alimena, G; Amabile, M; Baccarani, M; Cilloni, D; Gobbi, M; Iacobucci, I; Iuliano, F; Martinelli, G; Martino, B; Montefusco, E; Ottaviani, E; Pane, F; Poerio, A; Rosti, G; Russo, D; Saglio, G; Soverini, S; Terragna, C; Testoni, N, 2006
)
1.78
"Imatinib mesylate is a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has significant efficacy in the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukaemia (CML). "( Multiple joint effusions associated with high-dose imatinib therapy in a patient with chronic myelogenous leukaemia.
Anavim, A; Dennehey, CF; Kong, KM; Moore, JC; Tiong Ong, S, 2006
)
1.78
"Imatinib mesylate is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets bcr-Abl, c-kit, platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)-alpha, and PDGFR-beta, leading to remarkable clinical responses in several cancers."( Multicenter Phase II trial of high-dose imatinib mesylate in metastatic melanoma: significant toxicity with no clinical efficacy.
Atkins, MB; Byrnes, C; Eton, O; Hubbard, F; McDermott, DF; Prieto, V; Sanders, K; Sosman, JA; Wyman, K, 2006
)
1.32
"Imatinib mesylate, STI571, is a novel anticancer drug used to treat Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia. "( An in vitro study of the cytogenetic and cytotoxic effects of imatinib mesylate, STI571 on murine erythroleukemia GM-86 cells.
Fotiadis, NA; Kirk, MJ; Majumdar, SK, 2006
)
2.02
"Imatinib mesylate is a drug that has been recently approved for the treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia. "( Vitiligo-like lesions and diffuse lightening of the skin in a pediatric patient treated with imatinib mesylate: a noninvasive colorimetric assessment.
Barbagallo, T; Bellani, E; Borroni, G; Brazzelli, V; Locatelli, F; Prestinari, F; Rona, C; Roveda, E; Trevisan, V; Zecca, M,
)
1.79
"Imatinib mesylate (Glivec) is a small molecule that binds to the ATP pocket of ABL and blocks downstream signalling events."( [Tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of CML].
Heim, D, 2006
)
1.06
"Imatinib mesylate (Glivec) is an orally administered competitive inhibitor of tyrosine kinases associated with the KIT, ABL protein, licensed for the treatment of metastatic GIST since 2002 in Germany."( Treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor with imatinib mesylate: a retrospective single-center experience in Heidelberg.
Egerer, G; Geer, T; Herrmann, T; Ho, AD; Kallinowski, B; Kasper, B; Lehnert, T; Mechtersheimer, G, 2006
)
1.31
"Imatinib mesylate is a very effective treatment in patients with Philadelphia (Ph)-positive chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). "( Imatinib-associated neutropenia may not be overcome by filgrastim treatment in patients with blastic phase of chronic myeloid leukaemia.
Calbecka, M; Hellmann, A; Prejzner, W; Wyrowinska, E; Zaucha, JM, 2006
)
1.78
"Imatinib Mesylate (Glivec) is a specific inhibitor of Bcr-Abl kinase."( [Chronic myeloid leukemia--resistance to imatinib mesylate (Glivec)--literature review and personal experience].
Divoký, V; Faber, E; Indrák, K; Jarosová, M; Nausová, J; Priwitzerová, M, 2006
)
1.32
"Imatinib mesylate (IM), is a selective and competitive inhibitor of tyrosine kinases, including BCR-ABL, ABL, KIT, and the platelet-derived growth factor receptors (PDGF-R). "( Tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib mesylate as anticancer agent for advanced ocular melanoma expressing immunoistochemical C-KIT (CD 117): preliminary results of a compassionate use clinical trial.
Bernardeschi, P; Biancalani, M; De Giorgi, U; Dentico, P; Fiorentini, G; Lanzanova, G; Palomba, A; Rossi, S, 2003
)
2.06
"Imatinib mesylate is a potent inhibitor of c-kit receptor tyrosine kinase activity."( Imatinib mesylate in the treatment of systemic mastocytosis: a phase II trial.
Droogendijk, HJ; Kluin-Nelemans, HJ; Oranje, AP; van Daele, PL; van de Loosdrecht, AA; van Doormaal, JJ, 2006
)
2.5
"Imatinib mesylate is a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor on ABL, c-Kit and PGDF-receptor, and functions through competitive inhibition at the ATP-binding site of the enzyme, which leads to growth arrest or apoptosis in cells that express BCR-ABL."( Treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia with imatinib mesylate.
Ohno, R, 2006
)
1.32
"Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) is a small-molecule inhibitor of the fusion protein Bcr-Abl, the causal agent in chronic myelogenous leukemia. "( Cardiotoxicity of the cancer therapeutic agent imatinib mesylate.
Alroy, J; Beahm, C; Clubb, FJ; Durand, JB; Force, T; Grazette, L; Iliescu, C; Kerkelä, R; Patten, R; Pesant, S; Rosenzweig, A; Salomon, RN; Shevtsov, S; Van Etten, RA; Walters, B; Yacobi, R, 2006
)
2.03
"Imatinib mesylate (imatinib) is a potent inhibitor of defined tyrosine kinases (TKs) and is effective in the treatment of malignancies characterized by constitutive activation of these TKs such as chronic myeloid leukemia and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. "( Imatinib mesylate selectively impairs expansion of memory cytotoxic T cells without affecting the control of primary viral infections.
Matter, M; Mumprecht, S; Ochsenbein, AF; Pavelic, V, 2006
)
3.22
"Imatinib mesylate is a novel therapeutic agent that targets the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase, the molecular abnormality associated with Ph+ ALL."( Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: impact of imatinib treatment on remission induction and allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
Kovacsovics, T; Maziarz, RT, 2006
)
1.06
"Imatinib mesylate (STI571) is a specific inhibitor of the BCR/ABL fusion tyrosine kinase that exhibits potent antileukemic effects in CML."( Comparative study of DNA damage, cell cycle and apoptosis in human K562 and CCRF-CEM leukemia cells: role of BCR/ABL in therapeutic resistance.
Majsterek, I; Pytel, D; Wysocki, T, 2006
)
1.06
"Imatinib mesylate is a specific inhibitor of the Bcr-Abl protein tyrosine kinase that competes with ATP for its specific binding site in the kinase domain. "( The effect of imatinib mesylate (Glivec) on human tumor-derived cells.
Cree, IA; Di Nicolantonio, F; Glaysher, S; Hungerford, JL; Hurren, J; Knight, LA; Lamont, A; Mercer, SJ; Sharma, S; Whitehouse, PA, 2006
)
2.14
"Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia and hypereosinophilic syndrome. "( Desensitization to imatinib in patients with leukemia.
Cornetta, K; Cripe, LD; Fausel, C; Nelson, RP; Ramanuja, S; Ward, KE, 2006
)
1.78
"Imatinib mesylate (imatinib) is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor developed to treat Bcr/Abl-expressing leukemias and subsequently found to treat c-Kit-expressing gastrointestinal stromal tumors."( Selective tyrosine kinase inhibition by imatinib mesylate for the treatment of autoimmune arthritis.
Chan, SM; Chang, A; Genovese, MC; Goodman, SB; Higgins, JP; Ho, PP; Lee, DM; Paniagua, RT; Robinson, WH; Sharpe, O; Song, JJ; Steinman, L; Thomas, FM; Tomooka, BH; Utz, PJ, 2006
)
1.32
"Imatinib mesylate is a clinically well-tolerated small molecule inhibitor that exerts selective, dual inhibition of the transforming growth factor beta (TGFbeta) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) pathways. "( Imatinib mesylate reduces production of extracellular matrix and prevents development of experimental dermal fibrosis.
Distler, JH; Distler, O; Gay, RE; Gay, S; Hauser, T; Huber, LC; Jüngel, A; Michel, BA; Schett, G; Schulze-Horsel, U; Zwerina, J, 2007
)
3.23
"Imatinib mesylate is a selective protein kinase inhibitor, highly active in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). "( Severe skin reaction in a patient with gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated with imatinib mesylate.
Catricalà, C; Ciccarese, M; Cognetti, F; Ferraresi, V; Ferrari, A; Zeuli, M,
)
1.8
"Imatinib mesylate is a selective inhibitor of the oncogenic tyrosine kinase, Bcr-Abl, and is widely used as a first-line treatment for chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). "( Different target range and cytotoxic specificity of adaphostin and 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin in imatinib-resistant and sensitive cell lines.
Barnes, DJ; De, S; Melo, JV; Moravcsik, E; van Hensbergen, P, 2007
)
1.78
"Imatinib mesylate is a small molecule inhibitor of certain tyrosine kinases, most notably the chimeric bcr-abl fusion protein found in CML. "( A phase II study of imatinib mesylate in children with refractory or relapsed solid tumors: a Children's Oncology Group study.
Adamson, PC; Bernstein, ML; Blaney, SM; Bond, M; Krailo, M; Pappo, A; Schultz, KR, 2008
)
2.11
"Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) is a well known drug for treating chronic myeloid leukemia and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. "( Synthesis and positron emission tomography studies of carbon-11-labeled imatinib (Gleevec).
Alexoff, D; Ding, YS; Fowler, JS; Kil, KE; Kim, SW; Lin, KS; Muench, L; Shea, C; Xu, Y, 2007
)
1.78
"Imatinib mesylate is a selective inhibitor of tyrosine kinases such as bcr-abl, c-Kit, c-Fms and platelet derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFRbeta)."( Preliminary data suggestive of a novel translational approach to mesothelioma treatment: imatinib mesylate with gemcitabine or pemetrexed.
Barbone, D; Bertino, P; Busacca, S; Favoni, R; Gaudino, G; Germano, S; Mutti, L; Pinato, S; Porta, C; Tassi, G, 2007
)
1.28
"Imatinib mesylate is a potent and selective inhibitory of the BCR/ABL tyrosine kinase."( Central nervous system blastic crisis in chronic myeloid leukemia on imatinib mesylate therapy: a case report.
Altintas, A; Ayyildiz, O; Cil, T; Kaplan, MA; Kilinc, I, 2007
)
1.3
"Imatinib mesylate is a potent inhibitor of ABL but also of PDGFR-alpha, and has been associated with durable hematologic responses in patients with HES."( The novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor EXEL-0862 induces apoptosis in human FIP1L1-PDGFR-alpha-expressing cells through caspase-3-mediated cleavage of Mcl-1.
Cortes, J; Giles, FJ; Kantarjian, H; Lamb, P; Manshouri, T; Pan, J; Quintás-Cardama, A; Tefferi, A; Verstovsek, S, 2007
)
1.06
"Imatinib mesylate (imatinib) is an inhibitor that specifically targets a set of protein tyrosine kinase, such as abl, c-kit, and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) and it is widely used to treat chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)."( Imatinib mesylate both prevents and treats the arthritis induced by type II collagen antibody in mice.
Ando, T; Hamada, Y; Haro, H; Hatsushika, K; Kato, R; Koyama, K; Nakao, A; Ogawa, H; Sakuma, M; Sugiyama, H; Wako, M, 2007
)
2.5
"Imatinib mesylate is a selective competitive inhibitor of the bcr-abl tyrosine kinase and c-KIT. "( Symptomatic hypoglycemia during imatinib mesylate in a non-diabetic female patient with gastrointestinal stromal tumor.
Gallwitz, B; Haap, M; Häring, HU; Hartmann, JT; Kanz, L; Müssig, K; Thamer, C, 2007
)
2.07
"Imatinib Mesylate (STI-571) is a potent inhibitor of Kit Kinase activity and different reports demonstrated its efficacy in unresectable or metastatic Gists."( Gastric GISTs. Personal experience.
Artuso, S; La Donna, M; Linguerri, R; Mingolla, GP; Riccio, PA; Zannelli, M,
)
0.85
"Imatinib mesylate is a selective inhibitor of the bcr/abl, c-kit and PDGF receptor tyrosine kinases. "( Ocular side effects in chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with imatinib.
Alimena, G; Breccia, M; Cannella, L; Carmosino, I; Frustaci, A; Gentilini, F; Latagliata, R, 2008
)
1.79
"Imatinib mesylate is a drug that has been approved for treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in blast crisis, accelerated or chronic phase, and also for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors. "( Imatinib-induced fatal acute liver failure.
Cacchione, R; Gadano, AC; Mandó, OG; Marciano, S; Ridruejo, E; Villamil, AG, 2007
)
1.78
"Imatinib mesylate (imatinib) is a new generation preparation that is now successfully used for treatment of cancer, particularly for chemotherapy of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). "( Role of P-glycoprotein in evolution of populations of chronic myeloid leukemia cells treated with imatinib.
Kruglov, SS; Mechetner, EB; Rybalkina, EY; Stavrovskaya, AA; Stromskaya, TP; Turkina, AG; Zabotina, TN, 2008
)
1.79
"Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) is a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for use in the management of chronic myeloid leukemia in adults and children and in gastrointestinal stromal tumors in adults. "( Population pharmacokinetics of imatinib mesylate and its metabolite in children and young adults.
Barrett, JS; Bernstein, M; Blaney, SM; Bond, M; Champagne, M; Fossler, MJ; Jayaraman, B; Menon-Andersen, D; Mondick, JT; Thompson, PA, 2009
)
2.08
"Imatinib mesylate is a BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor used in the management of chronic myeloid leukemia. "( Imatinib-related bone marrow aplasia after complete cytogenetic response in chronic myeloid leukemia.
Junaid, A; Khan, KA; Mukhtar, K; Siddiqui, NS; Siddiqui, S, 2008
)
1.79
"Imatinib mesylate is a selective inhibitor of several protein tyrosine kinases, including the receptor of platelet-derived growth factor, an important mediator of desmoplasia."( Imatinib mesylate inhibits proliferation and exerts an antifibrotic effect in human breast stroma fibroblasts.
Gioni, V; Karamanos, NK; Karampinas, T; Kletsas, D; Papadopoulos, S; Roussidis, AE; Voutsinas, G, 2008
)
2.51
"Imatinib mesylate (STI571) is a promising new treatment for chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). "( Imatinib mesylate (STI571) inhibits growth of primitive malignant progenitors in chronic myelogenous leukemia through reversal of abnormally increased proliferation.
Bhatia, R; Forman, SJ; Holtz, MS; Sawyers, CL; Slovak, ML; Zhang, F, 2002
)
3.2
"Imatinib mesylate (STI571) is a specific inhibitor of BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase that can induce hematologic and cytogenetic remissions in patients with CML."( Imatinib mesylate (STI571) in the treatment of relapse of chronic myeloid leukemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
Apperley, JF; Craddock, C; Dazzi, F; Goldman, JM; Marin, D; Marktel, S; Olavarria, E, 2002
)
2.48

Effects

Imatinib mesylate has been shown to effectively block constitutively active KIT and delay tumor growth. It has considerable antineoplastic activity in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) and some solid tumours.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Imatinib mesylate has a substantial, but short term activity in the accelerated phase and blastic crisis of the Ph+ CML."( [Treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia with imatinib in the accelerated stage of the disease].
Boban, D; Bogdanić, V; Bulum, J; Kovacević, J; Krecak-Gverić, V; Labar, B; Mikulić, M; Mrsić-Davidović, S; Nemet, D; Sertić, D; Serventi-Seiwerth, R; Zadro, R,
)
0.85
"Imatinib Mesylate (IMA) has been widely used to treat with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). "( Role of ferroptosis in promoting cardiotoxicity induced by Imatinib Mesylate via down-regulating Nrf2 pathways in vitro and in vivo.
Li, D; Song, C; Zhang, J; Zhao, X, 2022
)
2.41
"Imatinib mesylate (IM) has revolutionized the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). "( Targeting BCL6 in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Promotes p53-Mediated Apoptosis to Enhance the Antitumor Activity of Imatinib.
Hao, Y; Jia, J; Jiang, Q; Li, C; Liu, W; Lou, Z; Ma, X; Tao, K; Wang, T; Zeng, X; Zhang, P; Zhang, R; Zhao, F, 2023
)
2.35
"Imatinib mesylate has revolutionized the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML); however, some patients fail to respond and have a poor prognosis. "( Evaluation of Molecular Response to Imatinib Mesylate Treatment in Iranian Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.
Alimoghaddam, K; Babakhani, D; Chahardouli, B; Ghahremani, MH; Mohammadi, S; Nekoohesh, L; Nikbakht, M; Rostami, S, 2020
)
2.28
"Imatinib mesylate (IM) therapy has been shown to induce lower T cell counts in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) patients and an interference of IM with T cell receptor (TCR) signaling has been invoked to explain this observation. "( Imatinib mesylate inhibits STAT5 phosphorylation in response to IL-7 and promotes T cell lymphopenia in chronic myelogenous leukemia patients.
Busque, L; Guimond, M; Laflamme, P; Leboeuf, DM; Moutuou, MM; Roy, J; Sidi Boumedine, R; Thiant, S, 2017
)
3.34
"Imatinib mesylate has been associated with the changes in bone turnover. "( Soft tissue calcification secondary to imatinib mesylate in a patient with gastrointestinal stromal tumor.
Abushahin, F; Bossaer, JB; Enck, RE, 2014
)
2.11
"Imatinib mesylate has been a breakthrough treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia. "( Quantification of imatinib in human serum: validation of a high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method for therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacokinetic assays.
Bendit, I; de Alencar Fisher Chamone, D; Novaes, MM; Rezende, VM; Rivellis, A, 2013
)
1.83
"Imatinib mesylate (IM) has become a standard of care in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) therapy. "( Reduced ABCG2 and increased SLC22A1 mRNA expression are associated with imatinib response in chronic myeloid leukemia.
Bueno, CT; Chiattone, CS; de Castro, FA; de Lima, LT; de Lourdes F Chauffaille, M; Guerra-Shinohara, EM; Hirata, MH; Hirata, RD; Hungria, VT; Luchessi, AD; Vivona, D; Zanichelli, MA, 2014
)
1.85
"Imatinib mesylate has been the first of this novel family of drugs approved for the treatment of hematologic malignancies."( Tyrosine kinase inhibitors: muco-cutaneous side effects at the microscope.
Brazzelli, V; Croci, G; Grasso, V; Vassallo, C, 2014
)
1.12
"Imatinib mesylate (IM) has so far been the standard of care for treating chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), but the initial striking efficacy of this drug has been overshadowed by the development of clinical resistance, which may in part be caused by pharmacogenetic variability. "( ABCB1 haplotypes but not individual SNPs predict for optimal response/failure in Egyptian patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia receiving imatinib mesylate.
Ali, MA; Elsalakawy, WA, 2014
)
2.04
"Imatinib mesylate (IM) has substantial efficacy in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), and pathological complete response (pCR) following IM treatment has been sporadically reported; however, its clinical significance for GIST needs to be clarified."( Clinical significance of pathological complete response in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors after imatinib mesylate treatment--lessons learned.
Chen, TC; Chen, TW; Chen, YY; Cheng, CT; Chiang, KC; Jung, SM; Tsai, CY; Tseng, JH; Wang, SY; Yeh, CN; Yeh, TS, 2014
)
2.05
"Imatinib mesylate has been evaluated for possible potential in treatment of colon cancer in recent times. "( Hyaluronan coated liposomes as the intravenous platform for delivery of imatinib mesylate in MDR colon cancer.
Jaggi, M; Joshi, V; Negi, LM; Ronodip, K; Talegaonkar, S, 2015
)
2.09
"Imatinib mesylate has dramatically improved the outcome of children with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph* ALL) and is now included as first-line therapy. "( Imatinib-induced Severe Hepatitis in a 9-Year-old Girl With Philadelphia Chromosome-positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.
Fukushima, H; Fukushima, T; Kobayashi, C; Nanmoku, T; Sakai, A; Satomi, K; Sumazaki, R; Suzuki, R; Tagawa, M, 2015
)
1.86
"Imatinib mesylate has revolutionized the treatment of molecularly defined MN-eos, and novel agents have been successfully used to treat HES."( Eosinophilia in Hematologic Disorders.
Falchi, L; Verstovsek, S, 2015
)
1.14
"Imatinib mesylate (IM) has effectively improved the prognosis of GIST patients and has been established as principle therapy in metastatic GIST."( [Lancet in the era of targeted drug therapy: the role of surgery in the management of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor].
Cao, H; Wang, M, 2016
)
1.16
"Imatinib mesylate has activity against MCT in dogs, and response to treatment can be correlated to presence of mutation within exon 11 of c-kit."( Effect of tyrosine kinase inhibition by imatinib mesylate on mast cell tumors in dogs.
Bonkobara, M; Fujino, Y; Fujita, M; Ishida, N; Isotani, M; Kato, R; Kobayashi, T; Ochi, S; Ono, K; Setoguchi, A; Tamura, K; Tominaga, M; Washizu, T; Yagihara, H,
)
1.84
"Imatinib mesylate has clinical activity against MCT in dogs. "( Effect of tyrosine kinase inhibition by imatinib mesylate on mast cell tumors in dogs.
Bonkobara, M; Fujino, Y; Fujita, M; Ishida, N; Isotani, M; Kato, R; Kobayashi, T; Ochi, S; Ono, K; Setoguchi, A; Tamura, K; Tominaga, M; Washizu, T; Yagihara, H,
)
1.84
"Imatinib mesylate has shown promising results in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in all phases. "( Bone marrow morphological changes in patients of chronic myeloid leukemia treated with imatinib mesylate.
Amre, P; Deshmukh, C; Gujral, S; Joshi, S; Nair, CN; Sunita, P,
)
1.8
"Imatinib mesylate (IM, Gleevec) has largely supplanted allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) as first line therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). "( Impact of prior imatinib mesylate on the outcome of hematopoietic cell transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia.
Abecasis, M; Antin, JH; Arora, M; Bolwell, BJ; Carabasi, MH; Cervantes, F; Champlin, RE; Copelan, E; Gale, RP; George, B; Giralt, SA; Gupta, V; Hale, GA; Halter, J; Horowitz, MM; Ilhan, O; Keating, A; Khoury, HJ; Kukreja, M; Lee, SJ; Liesveld, JL; Litzow, MR; Marks, DI; Maziarz, RT; McCarthy, PL; Olavarria, E; Rizzieri, DA; Schouten, HC; Stadtmauer, EA; Szer, J; Wang, T; Woolfrey, AE; Zander, AR, 2008
)
2.13
"Imatinib mesylate has proven to be the most effective treatment in chronic myeloid leukemia. "( Specific assessment of BCR-ABL transcript overexpression and imatinib resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia patients.
Bengió, R; Bianchini, M; De Brasi, C; Gargallo, P; Gonzalez, M; Larripa, I, 2009
)
1.8
"Imatinib mesylate has become the treatment of choice for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML): the standard dose for chronic- phase (CP) CML is 400 mg daily. "( Results of high-dose imatinib mesylate in intermediate Sokal risk chronic myeloid leukemia patients in early chronic phase: a phase 2 trial of the GIMEMA CML Working Party.
Alimena, G; Amabile, M; Baccarani, M; Breccia, M; Castagnetti, F; Galieni, P; Iacobucci, I; Iuliano, F; Luatti, S; Martinelli, G; Palandri, F; Pane, F; Rege Cambrin, G; Rosti, G; Saglio, G; Soverini, S; Specchia, G; Stagno, F; Testoni, N, 2009
)
2.11
"Imatinib mesylate (imatinib) has been shown to be highly efficacious in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). "( Prevalence, determinants, and outcomes of nonadherence to imatinib therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: the ADAGIO study.
Abraham, I; Albrecht, T; Berneman, Z; De Bock, R; De Geest, S; MacDonald, K; Martiat, P; Mineur, P; Noens, L; Van Eygen, K; van Lierde, MA; Verhoef, G; Zachée, P, 2009
)
1.8
"Imatinib mesylate has significantly improved the outcome of patients with CML. "( [Correlation of quantification of major bcr-abl mRNA between TMA (transcription mediated amplification) method and real-time quantitative PCR].
Abe, A; Bessyo, M; Ishikawa, M; Jinnai, I; Kato, C; Kyo, T; Miyamura, K; Niwa, T; Ogura, K; Sasaki, H; Yagasaki, F, 2009
)
1.8
"Imatinib mesylate has significantly improved survival and quality of life of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). "( Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 has dual effects on gastrointestinal stromal tumor cell viability and sensitivity to the anti-tumor effects of imatinib mesylate in vitro.
Dupart, JJ; Godwin, AK; Hess, KR; Lee, HY; Taguchi, T; Trent, JC; Zhang, W, 2009
)
1.99
"Imatinib mesylate has been demonstrated to allow the emergence of T cells directed against chronic myeloid leukemia cells. "( Emergence of BCR-ABL-specific cytotoxic T cells in the bone marrow of patients with Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia during long-term imatinib mesylate treatment.
Barozzi, P; Basso, S; Comoli, P; D'Amico, R; Del Giovane, C; Forghieri, F; Locatelli, F; Luppi, M; Maccaferri, M; Morselli, M; Potenza, L; Quadrelli, C; Riva, G; Torelli, G; Vallerini, D; Volzone, F; Zanetti, E, 2010
)
2.01
"Imatinib mesylate has proven to be an extremely effective and generally well tolerated drug, producing durable responses in most patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukaemia. "( Managing imatinib resistance in chronic myeloid leukaemia.
Hughes, T; Osborn, M, 2010
)
1.8
"Imatinib mesylate has transformed the treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). "( Why doesn't imatinib cure chronic myeloid leukemia?
Redner, RL, 2010
)
1.8
"Imatinib mesylate has been proved effective for advanced GIST."( A long-term follow-up of the imatinib mesylate treatment for the patients with recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): the liver metastasis and the outcome.
Hou, M; Jiang, M; Yang, Y; Zhou, L; Zhu, J, 2010
)
1.37
"Imatinib mesylate has been used for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). "( Imatinib induced severe skin reactions and neutropenia in a patient with gastrointestinal stromal tumor.
Bae, WK; Cho, SH; Chung, IJ; Hwang, JE; Shim, HJ; Yoon, JY, 2010
)
1.8
"Imatinib mesylate has become a therapy of interest for the treatment of systemic sclerosis because of its ability to inhibit c-Abl and platelet-derived growth factor receptor, tyrosine kinases involved in profibrotic pathways. "( Imatinib and the treatment of fibrosis: recent trials and tribulations.
Gordon, J; Spiera, R, 2011
)
1.81
"Imatinib mesylate has shown remarkable efficacy in the treatment of patients in the chronic phase of chronic myeloid leukemia. "( hTERT promotes imatinib resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia cells: therapeutic implications.
Deville, L; Hillion, J; Nguyen, E; Pendino, F; Samy, M; Ségal-Bendirdjian, E, 2011
)
1.81
"Imatinib mesylate has shown significant safety and great effectiveness for patients with KIT-positive unresectable, advanced, or metastatic GIST."( [Evidence-based treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors-imatinib and sunitinib].
Nishida, T; Omori, T; Ueshima, S, 2011
)
1.09
"Imatinib mesylate has revolutionized the treatment of GIST. "( Advances in the surgical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumor.
Chaudhry, UI; DeMatteo, RP, 2011
)
1.81
"Imatinib mesylate has become the treatment of choice for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and has made a revolutionary impact on survival rates. "( Bone marrow necrosis secondary to imatinib usage, mimicking spinal metastasis on magnetic resonance imaging and FDG-PET/CT.
Akcakaya, MO; Aras, Y; Bilgic, B; Unal, OF; Unal, SN, 2012
)
1.82
"Imatinib mesylate has been commonly used in the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). "( [Molecular mechanism of imatinib-induced thrombocytopenia in treatment of patients with CML].
Jiang, QL; Meng, FY; Shu, LL; Yang, M, 2011
)
1.81
"Imatinib mesylate has been the standard therapeutic treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia, advanced and metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). "( Gynecomastia during imatinib mesylate treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a rare adverse event.
Liao, G; Liu, H; Yan, Z, 2011
)
2.14
"Imatinib mesylate has revolutionized the treatment landscape for patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. "( Chronic myeloid leukemia: mechanisms of resistance and treatment.
Cortes, J; Jabbour, E; Kantarjian, H; Parikh, SA, 2011
)
1.81
"Imatinib mesylate has proven activity in treating locally advanced or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). "( Renal dysfunction in a renal transplant patient treated concurrently with cyclosporine and imatinib.
Egorin, MJ; Mulder, KE; Sawyer, MB, 2012
)
1.82
"Imatinib mesylate has been efficacious in treating some of these MPDs."( Congenital and childhood myeloproliferative disorders with eosinophilia responsive to imatinib.
Abraham, S; Fluchel, M; Hancock, J; Jacobsen, J; Salama, M, 2012
)
1.1
"Imatinib mesylate has been commonly used in the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). "( [Imatinib in treatment of thrombocythemia and other myeloproliferative diseases].
Shu, LL; Yang, M, 2012
)
1.82
"Imatinib mesylate has been shown to be the first successful systemic therapy for patients with metastatic or unresectable disease and has revolutionized the treatment of this often rapidly progressive and fatal disease."( Management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Desai, J; George, S, 2002
)
1.04
"Imatinib mesylate has been reported to have activity against desmoid tumor, most likely because of c-kit and PDGFR receptor tyrosine kinase activity inhibition, and warrants further study. "( Response of extraabdominal desmoid tumors to therapy with imatinib mesylate.
Baker, L; Hayes, C; Mace, J; McGinn, C; Sondak, V; Sybil Biermann, J; Thomas, D, 2002
)
2
"Imatinib mesylate has recently been shown to be efficacious in MPDs with PDGFR activation."( Cloning of the t(1;5)(q23;q33) in a myeloproliferative disorder associated with eosinophilia: involvement of PDGFRB and response to imatinib.
Aguiar, RC; Aster, JC; Lee, C; Lopes, LF; Shipp, MA; Velloso, ER; Wilkinson, K, 2003
)
1.04
"Imatinib mesylate has recently been shown to be highly effective in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). "( Imatinib mesylate therapy of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia resistant or intolerant to interferon: results and prognostic factors for response and progression-free survival in 150 patients.
Alvarez-Larrán, A; Camós, M; Cervantes, F; Conde, E; García-Conde, J; Hernández-Boluda, JC; López-Jiménez, J; Odriozola, J; Osorio, S; Steegmann, JL; Villalón, L, 2003
)
3.2
"Imatinib mesylate has promising single-agent antileukemic activity in patients with advanced Ph(+) acute leukemias."( Risk and prognosis of central nervous system leukemia in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute leukemias treated with imatinib mesylate.
Binckebanck, A; Brück, P; Gökbuget, N; Gschaidmeier, H; Hoelzer, D; Hofmann, WK; Komor, M; Leimer, L; Lübbert, M; Ottmann, OG; Pfeifer, H; Scheuring, U; Schleyer, E; Wassmann, B; Wolff, T, 2003
)
1.24
"Imatinib mesylate has a substantial, but short term activity in the accelerated phase and blastic crisis of the Ph+ CML."( [Treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia with imatinib in the accelerated stage of the disease].
Boban, D; Bogdanić, V; Bulum, J; Kovacević, J; Krecak-Gverić, V; Labar, B; Mikulić, M; Mrsić-Davidović, S; Nemet, D; Sertić, D; Serventi-Seiwerth, R; Zadro, R,
)
0.85
"Imatinib mesylate has become an effective agent for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). "( Imatinib mesylate effectively combines with chaperone-rich cell lysate-loaded dendritic cells to treat bcr-abl+ murine leukemia.
Feng, H; Graner, MW; Katsanis, E; Li, G; Zeng, Y, 2004
)
3.21
"Imatinib mesylate has shown some promise in the treatment of HES. "( Imatinib mesylate treatment in two patients with idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome.
Kovacs, MJ; Payne, SM,
)
3.02
"Imatinib mesylate has been found to have antitumor activity in patients with chordoma. "( Imatinib mesylate in chordoma.
Bertieri, R; Bertulli, R; Casali, PG; Colecchia, M; Crippa, F; Fumagalli, E; Greco, A; Gronchi, A; Grosso, F; Messina, A; Olmi, P; Orlandi, R; Pierotti, MA; Pilotti, S; Ripamonti, C; Spreafico, C; Stacchiotti, S; Tamborini, E, 2004
)
3.21
"Imatinib mesylate has been reported to produce positive results in atypical chronic myeloproliferative disorders (CMD) with chromosomal translocations that disrupt the platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta gene (PDGFRB). "( Lack of response to imatinib mesylate in a patient with accelerated phase myeloproliferative disorder with rearrangement of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta-gene.
Bastie, JN; Castaigne, S; Cross, NC; Garcia, I; Mahon, FX; Terré, C, 2004
)
2.09
"Imatinib mesylate has been useful in the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia and B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia through the inhibition of BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase activity."( Sole BCR-ABL inhibition is insufficient to eliminate all myeloproliferative disorder cell populations.
Cheng, D; McLaughlin, J; Shokat, KM; Witte, ON; Wong, S; Zhang, C, 2004
)
1.04
"Imatinib mesylate (imatinib) has shown significant effects in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia. "( [Imatinib mesylate plus G-CSF therapy for chronic myelogenous leukemia in the blastic crisis].
Asaka, M; Dazai, M; Hashino, S; Imamura, M; Izumiyama, K; Kobayashi, S; Kondo, T; Morita, R; Onozawa, M; Ota, S; Sogabe, S, 2004
)
2.68
"Imatinib mesylate has become one of the main chemotherapeutic agents currently used to treat patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). "( Imatinib-induced sweet syndrome in a patient with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Ayirookuzhi, SJ; Ma, L; Mills, G; Ramshesh, P, 2005
)
1.77
"Imatinib mesylate has antitumor activity in vitro and in vivo against neuroblastoma cell lines and xenografts characterized by a different expression of receptor tyrosine kinases. "( Antitumor activity of imatinib mesylate in neuroblastoma xenografts.
Brueggen, J; Dominici, C; Gessi, M; Meco, D; Riccardi, A; Riccardi, R; Servidei, T, 2005
)
2.09
"Imatinib mesylate has become the treatment of choice, especially for patients for whom allogenic stem cell transplantation is not an option."( Isolated central nervous system blast crisis in chronic myeloid leukemia.
Raghunadharao, D; Rajappa, S; Rao, IS; Surath, A; Uppin, SG, 2004
)
1.04
"Imatinib mesylate has become the gold standard front-line treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia through its ability to inhibit ABL tyrosine kinase. "( The role of the K247R substitution in the ABL tyrosine kinase domain in sensitivity to imatinib.
Cayuela, JM; Chabane, K; Hayette, S; Nicolini, FE; Rousselot, P; Thomas, X, 2006
)
1.78
"Imatinib mesylate has considerable antineoplastic activity in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) and some solid tumours. "( In vivo effects of imatinib mesylate on human haematopoietic progenitor cells.
Agis, H; Doninger, B; Drach, J; Jaeger, E; Marosi, C; Oehler, L; Schwarzinger, I; Sillaber, C; Valent, P, 2006
)
2.1
"Imatinib mesylate has been shown to effectively block constitutively active KIT and delay tumor growth."( Flavopiridol targets c-KIT transcription and induces apoptosis in gastrointestinal stromal tumor cells.
Ambrosini, G; Chen, JH; Decarolis, P; Geha, RC; Kennealey, PT; Motwani, M; O'connor, R; Sambol, EB; Schwartz, GK; Singer, S; Wu, YV, 2006
)
1.06
"Imatinib mesylate has been shown to induce hematologic and cytogenetic response in adults and children with CML."( Mobilization of Ph chromosome-negative peripheral blood stem cells in a child with chronic myeloid leukemia after imatinib-induced complete molecular remission.
Frangoul, H; Loken, MR; Manes, B; Vnencak-Jones, CL; Woods-Swafford, W, 2008
)
1.07
"Imatinib mesylate has undoubted efficacy in the treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), but complete responses have only been reported rarely."( Two cases of complete response after imatinib mesylate treatment of advanced GIST.
Economopoulos, T; Gaglia, A; Lianos, E; Nikolaou, M; Papaxoinis, G; Pectasides, D,
)
1.85
"Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) has dramatically changed the strategy of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) therapy. "( [Innovation of clinical trials for anti-cancer drugs in Japan--proposals from academia with special reference to the development of novel Bcr-Abl/Lyn tyrosine kinase inhibitor INNO-406 (NS-187) for imatinib-resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia].
Maekawa, T, 2007
)
1.78
"Imatinib mesylate has substantial activity in chronic phase of CML. "( Chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia: response of imatinib mesylate and significance of Sokal score, age and disease duration in predicting the hematological and cytogenetic response.
Adil, SN; Kakepoto, GN; Khurshid, M; Syed, NN; Usman, M, 2007
)
2.03
"Imatinib mesylate has revolutionised the treatment of GIST and offers good palliation and prolongation of overall survival."( Massive intraperitoneal stromal tumour: two-year follow-up.
Blasco, SB; Calvet, JD; Carbajo-Ferré, EM; Déjardin, Ddel C; González, MH; Lanao, MA; Lara, CD; Marín, AS; Moreno, VV; Pereferrer, FS; Pérez, JS, 2007
)
1.78
"Imatinib mesylate has been well tolerable and widely used for chronic myeloid leukemia and gastrointestinal stromal tomor."( [Imatinib mesylate as a novel therapeutic drug for systemic rheumatic diseases].
Kameda, H, 2007
)
1.97
"Imatinib mesylate (imatinib) has revolutionized clinical outcomes of patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). "( Association of intratumoral vascular endothelial growth factor expression and clinical outcome for patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with imatinib mesylate.
Benjamin, RS; Lazar, AJ; McAuliffe, JC; Qiao, W; Raymond, AK; Steinert, DM; Thall, PF; Trent, JC; Yang, D, 2007
)
1.98
"Imatinib mesylate (IM) has rapidly become the front-line treatment of Philadelphia-positive (Ph-pos) chronic myeloid leukemia, but the number of patients who were treated and are being treated with IM second-line is still substantial."( Long-term outcome of complete cytogenetic responders after imatinib 400 mg in late chronic phase, philadelphia-positive chronic myeloid leukemia: the GIMEMA Working Party on CML.
Abruzzese, E; Amabile, M; Baccarani, M; Breccia, M; Castagnetti, F; Cilloni, D; De Vivo, A; Iacobucci, I; Liberati, AM; Martinelli, G; Martino, B; Palandri, F; Pane, F; Poerio, A; Rosti, G; Saglio, G; Soverini, S; Specchia, G; Testoni, N, 2008
)
1.79
"Imatinib mesylate has specific activity in inhibiting select tyrosine kinase receptors, including platelet-derived growth factor receptors (PDGFRs) and c-kit. "( Improving chemotherapeutic drug penetration in melanoma by imatinib mesylate.
Furuhashi, M; Kawamura, T; Ogawa, Y; Shimada, S; Tsukamoto, K, 2008
)
2.03
"Imatinib mesylate has been proven to be effective in advanced GIST."( Imatinib mesylate treatment for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a pilot study focusing on patients experiencing sole liver metastasis after a prior radical resection.
Hou, M; Li, HY; Wang, Y; Zhang, J; Zhu, J, 2007
)
2.5
"Imatinib mesylate also has activity as a single agent in CML blast crisis and in patients with Ph(+) acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL)."( Signal transduction inhibition: results from phase I clinical trials in chronic myeloid leukemia.
Druker, B, 2001
)
1.03

Actions

Imatinib mesylate plays a key role in the management of GISTs both as neoadjuvant therapy and in patients with recurrent and metastatic disease. Imatinib Mesylate (STI571) can inhibit c-kit tyrosine kinase activity.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Imatinib mesylate plays a key role in the management of GISTs both as neoadjuvant therapy and in patients with recurrent and metastatic disease."( Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor: From clinicopathological features to surgical outcomes.
Boccardi, V; Marano, L; Marrelli, D; Roviello, F, 2015
)
1.14
"Imatinib mesylate and AMN107 inhibit orbital fibroblast proliferation and hyaluronan production induced by PDGF-BB; a factor highly expressed in orbital tissue from patients with GO. "( Imatinib mesylate and AMN107 inhibit PDGF-signaling in orbital fibroblasts: a potential treatment for Graves' ophthalmopathy.
Dik, WA; Dingjan, GM; Drexhage, HA; Hooijkaas, H; Paridaens, D; Schrijver, B; van Daele, PL; van den Bosch, WA; van Hagen, PM; van Steensel, L, 2009
)
3.24
"Imatinib mesylate (STI571) can inhibit c-kit tyrosine kinase activity, but clinical trials have resulted in failure."( Imatinib mesylate (STI571) enhances amrubicin-induced cytotoxic activity through inhibition of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway in small cell lung cancer cells.
Igishi, T; Kodani, M; Matsumoto, S; Matsunami, K; Morita, M; Nakazaki, H; Shigeoka, Y; Shimizu, E; Sumikawa, T; Suyama, H; Takeda, K; Ueda, Y, 2010
)
2.52
"Imatinib mesylate may obviously inhibit the development of PF induced by bleomycin in mice."( [Effect of imatinib mesylate on bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice].
Li, L; Li, YQ, 2007
)
2.17

Treatment

Imatinib mesylate treatment decreases fibrosis and results in the relatively rapid and steady improvement of skin changes and knee joint contractures in patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease and NSF. Imatinib Mesylate is standard treatment for patients who have advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), but not all patients benefit equally.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Imatinib mesylate (IM) treatment adherence is a challenge, especially in an economic-social population neglected from developing countries."( Pro-adherence complementary audiovisual educational intervention model for chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with imatinib mesylate.
Barbosa, ADP; Carneiro, WJ; Cruz, AC; Cunha, LCD; Cunha, MMBD; Dewulf, NLS; Lemes, GA; Oliveira, FNM; Rodrigues Martins, M, 2023
)
2.56
"Imatinib mesylate treatment was started postoperatively."( Prolapsed giant rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor presented with incarceration A rare case of emergency rectal lesion.
Aydin, E; Erdogan, O; Rencuzogullari, A; Teke, Z, 2020
)
1.28
"Imatinib mesylate treatment decreases fibrosis and results in the relatively rapid and steady improvement of skin changes and knee joint contractures in patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease and NSF, despite the persistence of gadolinium in the tissues. "( Imatinib mesylate treatment of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis.
High, WA; Kay, J, 2008
)
3.23
"Imatinib mesylate is standard treatment for patients who have advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), but not all patients benefit equally. "( Correlation of kinase genotype and clinical outcome in the North American Intergroup Phase III Trial of imatinib mesylate for treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor: CALGB 150105 Study by Cancer and Leukemia Group B and Southwest Oncology Gr
Benjamin, RS; Bertagnolli, MM; Blanke, CD; Borden, EC; Bramwell, VH; Corless, CL; Demetri, GD; Fletcher, CD; Fletcher, JA; Heinrich, MC; Hollis, D; Owzar, K; Rankin, C; Ryan, CW; von Mehren, M, 2008
)
2
"The imatinib mesylate treatment could prolong the survival of the patients who have recurrent GIST after the radical surgery in spite of an existence of the liver metastasis. "( A long-term follow-up of the imatinib mesylate treatment for the patients with recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): the liver metastasis and the outcome.
Hou, M; Jiang, M; Yang, Y; Zhou, L; Zhu, J, 2010
)
1.21
"Imatinib mesylate (IM) is the treatment of choice in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), irrespectively of their age. "( Evaluation of tolerability and efficacy of imatinib mesylate in elderly patients with chronic phase CML: ELDERGLI study.
Avellaneda-Molina, C; Balanzat, J; Bargay, J; Boqué, C; del Cañizo, MC; Dios, A; Domingo, JM; Durán, S; Galende, J; García, I; Giraldo, P; Gracia, A; Hermosilla, M; López-Garrido, P; Luño-Fernandez, E; Moreno, MV; Nieto, JB; Salinas, R; Sánchez-Guijo, FM; Sanchez-Varela, JM; Soler, A, 2011
)
2.07
"Imatinib mesylate treatment markedly reduces the burden of leukemia cells in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) patients. "( Persistence of leukemia stem cells in chronic myelogenous leukemia patients in prolonged remission with imatinib treatment.
Bhatia, R; Chakraborty, S; Chu, S; Huang, Q; Lin, A; McDonald, T; Snyder, DS, 2011
)
1.81
"Imatinib mesylate treatment-induced activation of MAP kinases (including ERK1/2, p38, and JNK) and the phosphorylation of Akt and GSK-3beta."( BGP-15, a PARP-inhibitor, prevents imatinib-induced cardiotoxicity by activating Akt and suppressing JNK and p38 MAP kinases.
Berente, Z; Bognar, E; Gallyas, F; Gaszner, B; Kónyi, A; Sarszegi, Z; Sumegi, B, 2012
)
1.1
"Imatinib mesylate treatment strongly suppressed STAT-5 tyrosine-phosphorylation in K562 and primary CML blasts."( In BCR-ABL-positive cells, STAT-5 tyrosine-phosphorylation integrates signals induced by imatinib mesylate and Ara-C.
Breitenbuecher, F; Carius, B; Fischer, T; Gschaidmeier, H; Huber, C; Kasper, S; Kindler, T; Stevens, T, 2003
)
1.26
"Imatinib mesylate treatment is highly effective in chronic myeloid leukaemia and recent data have suggested that imatinib mesylate is also effective in the treatment of idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). "( Effective treatment of hypereosinophilic syndrome with imatinib mesylate.
Abboud, M; Bazarbachi, A; Bitar, N; Chami, B; Chehal, A; Kadri, A; Salem, Z; Zalloua, PA, 2003
)
2.01
"Imatinib mesylate treatment causes remissions in a majority of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), but relapses are an increasing problem. "( Instability of BCR-ABL gene in primary and cultured chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells.
Eaves, A; Eaves, C; Jiang, X; Saw, KM, 2007
)
1.78
"Imatinib mesylate treatment proved safe and effective for GIST patients who had liver metastasis alone. "( Imatinib mesylate treatment for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a pilot study focusing on patients experiencing sole liver metastasis after a prior radical resection.
Hou, M; Li, HY; Wang, Y; Zhang, J; Zhu, J, 2007
)
3.23
"When treated with imatinib mesylate (STI571), a specific c-Abl family kinase inhibitor, the p38 expression was decreased and the loss of dopaminergic neurons was reduced."( c-Abl-p38
Fu, J; Mu, G; Ou, C; Qiu, L; Zhao, J,
)
0.45
"Treatment with imatinib mesylate(imatinib) was initiated 13 days after surgery."( [A Case on the Long‒Term Effect of Imatinib on GIST of Unknown Primary Origin with Multiple Liver Metastases, Peritoneal Dissemination, and Bone Metastasis].
Ando, S; Fujiwara, Y; Kamei, R; Kitamura, Y; Matsui, H; Nagano, H; Sakamoto, K; Yamamoto, T; Yoshino, S, 2021
)
0.96
"Treatment with imatinib mesylate suppressed cell proliferation, which was accompanied by apoptotic induction and cell cycle arrest in the investigated cell lines."( Antiproliferative effects of imatinib mesylate on ZR‑75‑1 and MDA‑MB‑231 cell lines via PDGFR‑β, PDGF‑BB, c‑Kit and SCF expression.
Aditya, A; Akbari Javar, H; Davoudi, ET; Ibrahim Noordin, M; Kadivar, A; Kamalidehghan, B; Sedghi, R, 2018
)
1.11
"Treatment with imatinib mesylate, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, results in rapid and complete resolution of hypereosinophilia and associated symptoms, except for those related to sub-endocardial fibrosis that may be irreversible."( Severe Prolonged Cough as Presenting Manifestation of FIP1L1-PDGFRA+ Chronic Eosinophilic Leukaemia: A Widely Ignored Association.
Bron, D; Cordier, JF; Cottin, V; Heimann, P; Lambert, F; Roufosse, F; Sidon, P, 2016
)
0.77
"GIST treated with imatinib mesylate or second-line therapies that target mutant forms of these receptors generally escape disease control and progress over time."( Combination of Imatinib Mesylate and AKT Inhibitor Provides Synergistic Effects in Preclinical Study of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor.
Belinsky, MG; Devarajan, K; Gersz, L; Godwin, AK; Pathak, HB; Rink, L; von Mehren, M; Zhou, Y; Zook, P, 2017
)
1.13
"Treatment with imatinib mesylate alone has been shown to have excellent long-term efficacy against myeloproliferative neoplasms; however, its long-term effects on ALL and AML have not been elucidated."( Marked response to imatinib mesylate in a patient with platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta-associated acute myeloid leukemia.
Ishikawa, T; Maruoka, H; Shimomura, Y, 2017
)
1.12
"Treatment with imatinib mesylate (IM) results in an increased viable cell number of non-BCR-ABL-expressing cell lines by inhibiting spontaneous apoptosis. "( Cytoprotective effect of imatinib mesylate in non-BCR-ABL-expressing cells along with autophagosome formation.
Itoh, M; Kuroda, M; Miyazawa, K; Moriya, S; Naito, M; Ohtomo, T; Tomoda, A, 2010
)
1.02
"Treatment with imatinib mesylate was started in an attempt to decrease the tumor load."( Disappearance of lentigines in a patient receiving imatinib treatment for familial gastrointestinal stromal tumor syndrome.
Campbell, T; Felsten, L; Moore, J, 2009
)
0.69
"Treatment with imatinib mesylate at a daily dose of 75 mg/kg for 4 weeks reduced the graft size by an average of 80% (n = 8), significantly different from the original sizes within the group and from sizes of the grafts in 11 untreated mice in the control group (P < 0.001)."( Imatinib mesylate (Glivec) inhibits Schwann cell viability and reduces the size of human plexiform neurofibroma in a xenograft model.
Demestre, M; Friedrich, RE; Hagel, C; Herzberg, J; Holtkamp, N; Kluwe, L; Kurtz, A; Mautner, VF; Reuss, D; Von Deimling, A, 2010
)
2.14
"Treatment by imatinib mesylate induced an haematological remission, the control of the infection and thoracotomy cicatrization."( [Clonal eosinophilia revealed by recurrent Staphylococcus aureus infection].
Dumon-Gubeno, MC; Figueredo, M; Medioni, LD; Mouroux, J; Naman, H; Nicolle, I; Tarhini, A; Vandenbos, F, 2011
)
0.72
"Treatment with imatinib mesylate in previously treated chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia induced durable responses in a high proportion of patients and was related to satisfactory long-term and event-free survival."( Response to treatment with imatinib mesylate in previously treated chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients in a hospital in Brazil.
Daldegan, MB; Ferrari, I; Silveira, CA, 2011
)
1.01
"Treatment with imatinib mesylate led to accumulation of the cells in G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle."( Imatinib mesylate inhibits T-cell proliferation in vitro and delayed-type hypersensitivity in vivo.
Bulur, PA; Dietz, AB; Knutson, GJ; Litzow, MR; Souan, L; Vuk-Pavlovic, S, 2004
)
2.11
"Treatment with imatinib mesylate appears to reduce CML-associated bone marrow fibrosis in most patients who are treated during the chronic phase of disease. "( Imatinib mesylate therapy reduces bone marrow fibrosis in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia.
Bueso-Ramos, CE; Cortes, J; Giles, F; Kantarjian, H; Medeiros, LJ; O'Brien, S; Rios, MB; Talpaz, M, 2004
)
2.12
"Treatment with imatinib mesylate results in a high frequency of complete cytogenetic response, which can be further stratified using quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)."( Serial monitoring of BCR-ABL transcripts in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) treated with imatinib mesylate.
Ekeland-Sjöberg, K; Gustavsson, B; Hardling, M; Palmqvist, L; Ricksten, A; Stockelberg, D; Swolin, B; Wadenvik, H; Wei, Y, 2004
)
0.88
"Treatment with imatinib mesylate and VK2 for 96 h resulted in suppression of cell growth in a dose-dependent manner in all cell lines tested."( Combination of vitamin K2 plus imatinib mesylate enhances induction of apoptosis in small cell lung cancer cell lines.
Miyazawa, K; Ohyashiki, K; Yokoyama, T; Yoshida, T, 2005
)
0.95
"Treatment with Imatinib mesylate (Glivec), a recently discovered selective inhibitor of tyrosine kinases already used in chronic myeloid leukemia (in which an overexpression of tyrosine kinase is observed) was associated with tumor regression of more than 50% in the initial series of patients with GIST treated in 2001."( Treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors with imatinib mesylate: a major breakthrough in the understanding of tumor-specific molecular characteristics.
de Mestier, P; des Guetz, G, 2005
)
0.92
"Treatment with imatinib mesylate (imatinib) alone rapidly normalized these parameters in parallel with a decrease in the number of blast cells."( Use of imatinib mesylate for favorable control of hypercalcemia mediated by parathyroid hormone-related protein in a patient with chronic myelogenous leukemia at blast phase.
Hyodo, H; Ito, T; Katayama, Y; Kimura, A; Miyoshi, N; Niimi, H; Tanaka, H, 2005
)
1.12
"Treatment with imatinib mesylate (300 mg/day) promptly brought about complete remission."( Chronic eosinophilic leukemia with the FIP1L1-PDGFRalpha fusion gene in a patient with a history of combination chemotherapy.
Fujita, H; Kurata, M; Maeda, A; Matsui, T; Matsushita, A; Nagai, K; Sada, A; Takahashi, T; Tanaka, Y; Togami, K; Watanabe, N, 2006
)
0.67
"Treatment with imatinib mesylate has been a well-accepted therapy for chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). "( Control of aggressive fibromatosis by treatment with imatinib mesylate. A case report and review of the literature.
Szarlej-Wcislo, K; Szczylik, C; Wcislo, G, 2007
)
0.94
"Treatment with imatinib mesylate resulted within 6 months in a total disappearance of all chromosomal abnormalities with a complete cytogenetic and molecular response, which persists 3 years later."( Simultaneous regression of Philadelphia chromosome and multiple nonrecurrent clonal chromosomal abnormalities with imatinib mesylate in a patient autografted 22 years before for chronic myelogenous leukemia.
Barbu, V; Bories, D; Coppo, P; Gorin, NC; Portnoï, MF; Van Den Akker, J, 2007
)
0.89

Toxicity

Imatinib mesylate is generally safe and has significant activity in the treatment of advanced GIST in Japanese patients. Despite its increasing use in the pediatric population, there are limited data regarding adverse event profiles. The patient was treated continuously with 400mg/day of imatinib Mesylate with no significant adverse events. The tumor gradually reduced in size.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" We did a phase I study to identify the dose-limiting toxic effects of imatinib in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas including GISTs."( Safety and efficacy of imatinib (STI571) in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a phase I study.
Dimitrijevic, S; Donato di Paola, E; Judson, I; Martens, M; Nielsen, OS; Sciot, R; Silberman, S; Stroobants, S; Van Glabbeke, M; van Oosterom, AT; Verweij, J; Webb, A, 2001
)
0.31
" Toxic effects and haematological, biochemical, and radiological measurements were assessed during 8 weeks of follow-up."( Safety and efficacy of imatinib (STI571) in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a phase I study.
Dimitrijevic, S; Donato di Paola, E; Judson, I; Martens, M; Nielsen, OS; Sciot, R; Silberman, S; Stroobants, S; Van Glabbeke, M; van Oosterom, AT; Verweij, J; Webb, A, 2001
)
0.31
"Five patients on 500 mg imatinib twice daily had dose-limiting toxic effects (severe nausea, vomiting, oedema, or rash)."( Safety and efficacy of imatinib (STI571) in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a phase I study.
Dimitrijevic, S; Donato di Paola, E; Judson, I; Martens, M; Nielsen, OS; Sciot, R; Silberman, S; Stroobants, S; Van Glabbeke, M; van Oosterom, AT; Verweij, J; Webb, A, 2001
)
0.31
" This report indicates that STI-571 is a safe and effective drug in heavily pretreated patients."( Safety and efficacy of STI-571 (imatinib mesylate) in patients with bcr/abl-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT).
Beck, J; Beltrami, G; Carella, A; Corsetti, MT; Fischer, T; Gschaidmeier, H; Hehlmann, R; Hess, GR; Hochhaus, A; Huber, C; Kreil, S; Meinhardt, P; Reifenrath, C; Schuch, B, 2002
)
0.6
" There were no significant differences in toxic effects or response between the two doses."( Efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Blanke, CD; Capdeville, R; Corless, C; Demetri, GD; Dimitrijevic, S; Druker, BJ; Eisenberg, B; Fletcher, CD; Fletcher, JA; Heinrich, MC; Janicek, M; Joensuu, H; Kiese, B; Peng, B; Roberts, PJ; Silberman, SL; Silverman, SG; Singer, S; Tuveson, DA; Van den Abbeele, AD; von Mehren, M, 2002
)
0.63
" As a result of adverse effects, salvage therapy had to be discontinued or reduced in 14 patients (26%)."( Outcome and toxicity of salvage treatment on patients relapsing after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation--experience from a single center.
Berlanga, J; Büchler, T; Encuentra, M; Ferra, C; Gallardo, D; Grañena, A; Hermosilla, M; Sarra, J, 2003
)
0.32
" We conclude that filgrastim-induced CD34+ cell aphaeresis under simultaneous imatinib medication is safe and feasible in CML patients."( Filgrastim-induced stem cell mobilization in chronic myeloid leukaemia patients during imatinib therapy: safety, feasibility and evidence for an efficient in vivo purging.
Baskaynak, G; Dörken, B; Klühs, C; Kreuzer, KA; le Coutre, P; Movassaghi, K, 2004
)
0.32
" In this article, we attempted to analyze the clinic efficacy and side effect of STI571 treatment on CML patients in different phase."( [Clinical efficacy and side effects of STI571 in treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia].
Du, QF; Liu, QF; Liu, XL; Meng, FY; Song, LL; Xu, B; Zhang, S; Zheng, WY; Zhou, SY, 2004
)
0.32
" At the same time, the side effects and adverse events of STI571 treatment were evaluated."( [Clinical efficacy and side effects of STI571 in treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia].
Du, QF; Liu, QF; Liu, XL; Meng, FY; Song, LL; Xu, B; Zhang, S; Zheng, WY; Zhou, SY, 2004
)
0.32
" To improve dosing flexibility, particularly with regard to the pediatric population and the management of adverse events, a scored 100-mg film-coated tablet has also been introduced."( Bioequivalence, safety, and tolerability of imatinib tablets compared with capsules.
Capdeville, R; Ho, YY; Hubert, M; Keller, U; Nikolova, Z; Peng, B; Schran, H; Sieberling, M, 2004
)
0.32
" After the third dosing, subjects were monitored to assess delayed drug-related adverse events."( Bioequivalence, safety, and tolerability of imatinib tablets compared with capsules.
Capdeville, R; Ho, YY; Hubert, M; Keller, U; Nikolova, Z; Peng, B; Schran, H; Sieberling, M, 2004
)
0.32
" Eight mild and one moderate adverse event considered to be drug related were reported."( Bioequivalence, safety, and tolerability of imatinib tablets compared with capsules.
Capdeville, R; Ho, YY; Hubert, M; Keller, U; Nikolova, Z; Peng, B; Schran, H; Sieberling, M, 2004
)
0.32
"Film-coated 100-mg (scored) and 400-mg tablet dose forms of imatinib are bioequivalent to the commercial 100-mg hard-gelatin capsule, and are as safe and well tolerated."( Bioequivalence, safety, and tolerability of imatinib tablets compared with capsules.
Capdeville, R; Ho, YY; Hubert, M; Keller, U; Nikolova, Z; Peng, B; Schran, H; Sieberling, M, 2004
)
0.32
" Mild non-hematologic adverse effects occurred in most of the patients, but were manageable and tolerable, or disappeared automatically."( [Efficacy and safety evaluation of imatinib in the treatment of patients with chronic granulocytic leukemia in accelerated phase].
Chen, SS; Jiang, B; Jiang, H; Jiang, Q; Lu, DP; Lu, Y, 2004
)
0.32
" Although 29 of 39 patients required an adjustment of dosing because of grade 3 or 4 adverse events, most of the events were reversible, and 25 of the 29 patients were able to resume therapy."( Efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate for patients in the first chronic phase of chronic myeloid leukemia: results of a Japanese phase II clinical study.
Bessho, M; Chiba, S; Emi, N; Fujimoto, M; Hirai, H; Hirano, M; Jinnai, I; Kawai, Y; Mizoguchi, H; Morishima, Y; Nakao, S; Nishimura, M; Ogura, M; Ohnishi, K; Ohno, R; Shimazaki, C; Taguchi, H; Takahashi, M; Tauchi, T; Urabe, A; Yazaki, F; Yokozawa, T, 2004
)
0.63
" Severe adverse hematological effects of imatinib are extremely rare."( [Hematological side effects of tyrosine kinase inhibition using imatinib].
Hochhaus, A; Schmitt-Graeff, A, 2006
)
0.33
" Maculopapular eruptions, erythematous eruptions, edema, and periorbital edema are the most common adverse events observed."( Imatinib mesylate and dermatology part 2: a review of the cutaneous side effects of imatinib mesylate.
Scheinfeld, N, 2006
)
1.78
" iT with IM is a feasible and safe strategy for short-time 'bridging' management of patients with significant hematologic toxicity after standard daily dosing."( Intermittent dosage of imatinib mesylate in CML patients with a history of significant hematologic toxicity after standard dosing.
Divoký, V; Egorin, MJ; Faber, E; Holzerová, M; Indrák, K; Jarosová, M; Maresová, I; Nausová, J; Rozmanová, S, 2006
)
0.64
" Transmission electron micrographs from humans and mice treated with imatinib show mitochondrial abnormalities and accumulation of membrane whorls in both vacuoles and the sarco- (endo-) plasmic reticulum, findings suggestive of a toxic myopathy."( Cardiotoxicity of the cancer therapeutic agent imatinib mesylate.
Alroy, J; Beahm, C; Clubb, FJ; Durand, JB; Force, T; Grazette, L; Iliescu, C; Kerkelä, R; Patten, R; Pesant, S; Rosenzweig, A; Salomon, RN; Shevtsov, S; Van Etten, RA; Walters, B; Yacobi, R, 2006
)
0.59
" Adverse reactions (ARs) reported included: 33% (5) gastrointestinal events, 40% (6) dermatologic events and/or edema, 14% (2) blood toxicity, and 13% (2) asthenia."( [Effectiveness and safety of imatinib in seven gastrointestinal stromal tumor cases].
Gabella Bazarot, E; Giménez Castellanos, J; Grutzmancher Saiz, S; Marín Ariza, I; Reina Zoiló, JJ; Sánchez Gómez, E,
)
0.13
" The incidence of adverse effect was 44."( [Efficacy and safety of adjuvant post-surgical therapy with imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients with high risk of recurrence: interim analysis from a multicenter prospective clinical trial].
Bi, JW; Chen, DD; Ding, KF; Gu, J; Li, R; Lu, HS; Lu, YF; Shao, YF; Shi, YQ; Sun, YH; Wan, DS; Wang, PZ; Wu, XT; Yu, JR; Zhan, WH; Zhang, XH; Zou, XM, 2006
)
0.33
"Imatinib is a promising postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in GISTs patients with high risk of recurrence, and the adverse effects are receivable."( [Efficacy and safety of adjuvant post-surgical therapy with imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients with high risk of recurrence: interim analysis from a multicenter prospective clinical trial].
Bi, JW; Chen, DD; Ding, KF; Gu, J; Li, R; Lu, HS; Lu, YF; Shao, YF; Shi, YQ; Sun, YH; Wan, DS; Wang, PZ; Wu, XT; Yu, JR; Zhan, WH; Zhang, XH; Zou, XM, 2006
)
0.33
" Therapy was reasonably well tolerated; the most common treatment-related adverse events were fatigue, diarrhoea, skin discolouration, and nausea."( Efficacy and safety of sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after failure of imatinib: a randomised controlled trial.
Baum, CM; Bello, CL; Blackstein, ME; Casali, PG; Demetri, GD; Desai, J; Fletcher, CD; Garrett, CR; George, S; Heinrich, MC; Huang, X; Judson, IR; McArthur, G; Morgan, JA; Shah, MH; van Oosterom, AT; Verweij, J, 2006
)
0.33
" The monitoring of these toxic effects in clinical practice is impeded by a dearth of reliable laboratory methods."( Development and validation of a liquid chromatography method for the simultaneous determination of alpha-tocopherol, retinol and retinyl esters in human serum using a monolithic column for the monitoring of anticancer therapy side effects.
Krcmová, L; Melichar, B; Opletalová, V; Solich, P; Solichová, D; Urbánek, L, 2006
)
0.33
" The most common adverse events reported included fluid retention, fatigue, diarrhea, and muscle cramps."( Emerging safety issues with imatinib and other Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Atallah, E; Cortes, J; Kantarjian, H, 2007
)
0.34
" On the other hand, after 72 h pre-treatment, all concentrations of DHA tested (25, 50 and 100 microM) enhanced the toxic effect of imatinib."( Docosahexaenoic acid enhances the toxic effect of imatinib on Bcr-Abl expressing HL-60 cells.
Amarante-Mendes, GP; Curi, R; de Lima, TM, 2007
)
0.34
" We here describe our experience on ocular complications in imatinib treated Ph+ CML patients, which consisted of a wide spectrum of adverse effects ranging from periobital oedema to serious adverse events such as glaucoma."( Ocular side effects in chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with imatinib.
Alimena, G; Breccia, M; Cannella, L; Carmosino, I; Frustaci, A; Gentilini, F; Latagliata, R, 2008
)
0.35
" We here describe the correlation of imatinib trough plasma concentrations (C(mins)) with clinical responses, event-free survival (EFS), and adverse events (AEs)."( Imatinib pharmacokinetics and its correlation with response and safety in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: a subanalysis of the IRIS study.
Druker, BJ; Gathmann, I; Guilhot, F; Krahnke, T; Larson, RA; O'Brien, SG; Riviere, GJ; Wang, Y, 2008
)
0.35
" The overall and progression free survival, hematologic, cytogenetic and molecular response, and adverse events were evaluated."( [Efficacy and safety of imatinib in treatment of 151 chronic myeloid leukemia patients].
Li, JM; Shen, ZX; Wang, AH; Wang, L; You, JH; Zhou, L, 2008
)
0.35
" (4) The adverse events of imatinib were moderate and tolerable."( [Efficacy and safety of imatinib in treatment of 151 chronic myeloid leukemia patients].
Li, JM; Shen, ZX; Wang, AH; Wang, L; You, JH; Zhou, L, 2008
)
0.35
" The most frequent adverse effects related to the drug were nausea (78%), diarrhea (70%), dermatitis (62%), facial edema (61%), edema of the lower limbs (58%), vomiting (54%), and eyelid edema (51%)."( Efficacy and safety profile of imatinib mesylate (ST1571) in Japanese patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a phase II study (STI571B1202).
Hirota, S; Koseki, M; Miyakawa, K; Nishida, T; Ohtsu, A; Okamura, T; Sawaki, A; Shirao, K; Sugiyama, T, 2008
)
0.63
"Imatinib mesylate is generally safe and has significant activity in the treatment of advanced GIST in Japanese patients."( Efficacy and safety profile of imatinib mesylate (ST1571) in Japanese patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a phase II study (STI571B1202).
Hirota, S; Koseki, M; Miyakawa, K; Nishida, T; Ohtsu, A; Okamura, T; Sawaki, A; Shirao, K; Sugiyama, T, 2008
)
2.07
" Recently, dasatinib dose optimisation in chronic-phase has reduced the incidence of such adverse events without modification of the efficacy, however, their optimal overall management can efficiently reduce their severity and minimize their impact on disease response."( [Guidelines for the management of dasatinib (Sprycel)-induced side effects in chronic myelogenous leukemia and Philadelphia positive acute lymphoblastic leukemias].
Bergeron, A; Cony-Makhoul, P; Corm, S; Dubruille, V; Nicolini, FE; Rea, D; Rigal-Huguet, F, 2008
)
0.35
" Cardiac toxicity is now recognized as a common adverse effect."( [Cardiac toxicity and edema].
Sakai, H; Takeuchi, S, 2008
)
0.35
" The aim of our study was to analyse the frequency and type of hematological and non-hematological adverse events in our series of late and early chronic phase patients with CML treated with imatinib and correlate the grade of hematological toxicity with the response obtained."( Differences in hematological and non-hematological toxicity during treatment with imatinib in patients with early and late chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia.
Alimena, G; Breccia, M; Cannella, L; Carmosino, I; Frustaci, AM; Latagliata, R; Santopietro, M; Stefanizzi, C, 2008
)
0.35
" The most common ocular side effect associated with imatinib mesylate is periorbital edema."( Ocular side effects associated with imatinib mesylate and perifosine for gastrointestinal stromal tumor.
Dogan, SS; Esmaeli, B, 2009
)
0.88
" We also review available data on the potential mechanisms by which these agents may cause adverse events (AEs) and we propose some general strategies to help clinicians to optimise treatment benefit with these agents."( Targeted therapies in the treatment of GIST: Adverse events and maximising the benefits of sunitinib through proactive therapy management.
Schöffski, P; Wolter, P, 2010
)
0.36
" Adverse events included grade 4 hypocalcemia (n=1) and grade 3 fatigue, dehydration and anorexia, genitourinary/renal, lymphatic, metabolic, and ocular toxicity (n=1 each, 4%)."( Efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) and immunohistochemical expression of c-Kit and PDGFR-beta in a Gynecologic Oncology Group Phase Il Trial in women with recurrent or persistent carcinosarcomas of the uterus.
Alvarez, RD; Birrer, MJ; Boggess, JF; Darcy, KM; Elias, KM; Hoffman, JS; Huh, WK; Long, HJ; O'Malley, DM; Sill, MW, 2010
)
0.67
"0 introduced the collection of attribution of adverse events (AEs) to study drug."( Evaluation of the value of attribution in the interpretation of adverse event data: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group and American College of Surgeons Oncology Group investigation.
Ballman, KV; Bot, B; Buckner, JC; DeMatteo, RP; Hillman, SL; Mandrekar, SJ; Nelson, H; Perez, EA; Sargent, DJ, 2010
)
0.36
" This pilot study suggests that it is probably safe to perform cardiac monitoring on an annual basis."( The use of imatinib mesylate has no adverse effects on the heart function. Results of a pilot study in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Barbosa, MM; Bittencourt, HN; Boersma, E; Clementino, NC; Geleijnse, ML; Marcolino, MS; Nunes, Mdo C; Ribeiro, AL; Silva, MH, 2011
)
0.76
" Although these agents have largely revolutionized the treatment of the systemic autoimmune diseases, adverse reactions, which can be serious and life threatening, to the various immunosuppressive agents used in the treatment of CTD can occur."( Toxicity and monitoring of immunosuppressive therapy used in systemic autoimmune diseases.
Baughman, R; Decker, C; Meyer, KC, 2010
)
0.36
" The most common motesanib treatment-related grade 3 adverse events included hypertension (23%), fatigue (9%), and diarrhea (5%)."( Efficacy and safety of motesanib, an oral inhibitor of VEGF, PDGF, and Kit receptors, in patients with imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Baker, L; Benjamin, RS; Blay, JY; Bui, BN; Duyster, J; Hartmann, JT; McCoy, S; Reichardt, P; Rosen, LS; Schöffski, P; Schuetze, S; Skubitz, K; Stepan, DE; Sun, YN; Van Oosterom, A, 2011
)
0.37
" The common adverse events were hand-foot syndrome, liver dysfunction, fatigue, anorexia and hypertension."( Clinical efficacy and safety of sunitinib after imatinib failure in Japanese patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor.
Hara, K; Hijioka, S; Kawai, H; Kondo, S; Matsumoto, K; Mizuno, N; Niwa, Y; Sawaki, A; Tajika, M; Yamao, K, 2011
)
0.37
" Although these agents are normally safe and effective, they can cause side effects that lead to intolerance and necessitate switching to an alternative treatment."( Management of adverse events associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia.
Deininger, M; Hochhaus, A; Jabbour, E, 2011
)
0.37
" Many patients treated with imatinib experience adverse events (AEs) at some time during their treatment."( Uncommon or delayed adverse events associated with imatinib treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia.
Salie, R; Silver, RT, 2010
)
0.36
" The foreseeable objective is to select personalized therapeutics, based on genetics characteristics that will result in more efficient and less toxic treatment."( How pharmacogenomics of biological response modifiers will influence clinical response and toxicity in dermatology.
Dalle, S; Shear, NH; Thomas, L, 2011
)
0.37
" Treatment with imatinib is generally well tolerated, and the risk for severe adverse effects is low, generally occurring during the early phase of treatment and correlating with imatinib dose, phase of disease and patient's characteristics."( The safety profile of imatinib in CML and GIST: long-term considerations.
Judson, I; Thanopoulou, E, 2012
)
0.38
"7%) experienced adverse events or severe adverse events with a suspected relationship to the study drug."( Activity and side effects of imatinib in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors: data from a German multicenter trial.
Bauer, S; Bokemeyer, C; Hartmann, JT; Hosius, C; Reichardt, P; Schlemmer, M; Schütte, R, 2011
)
0.37
" Bosutinib exhibited an acceptable safety profile; the most common treatment-emergent adverse event was mild/moderate, typically self-limiting diarrhea."( Safety and efficacy of bosutinib (SKI-606) in chronic phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia patients with resistance or intolerance to imatinib.
Abbas, R; Arkin, S; Besson, N; Brümmendorf, TH; Cortes, JE; Gambacorti-Passerini, C; Kantarjian, HM; Khoury, HJ; Kim, DW; Leip, E; Pasquini, R; Shen, ZX; Turkina, AG; Volkert, A; Wang, J, 2011
)
0.37
"Cardiotoxicity was an unanticipated side effect elicited by the clinical use of imatinib (Imb)."( A multifaceted evaluation of imatinib-induced cardiotoxicity in the rat.
Agee, S; Estis, J; Hasinoff, B; Herman, EH; Knapton, A; Lipshultz, S; Lu, QA; Rosen, E; Rosenzweig, B; Thompson, K; Todd, JA; Zhang, J, 2011
)
0.37
" It is well tolerated with mild adverse effects."( Gynecomastia during imatinib mesylate treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a rare adverse event.
Liao, G; Liu, H; Yan, Z, 2011
)
0.69
"Long-term adverse effects of Imatinib in children with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are uncertain."( Imatinib has adverse effect on growth in children with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Bansal, D; Marwaha, RK; Shava, U; Trehan, A; Varma, N, 2012
)
0.38
"Growth retardation is a significant adverse effect of imatinib in children with CML."( Imatinib has adverse effect on growth in children with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Bansal, D; Marwaha, RK; Shava, U; Trehan, A; Varma, N, 2012
)
0.38
" Detailed information on the occurrence and management of defined cardiac adverse events was extracted."( Clinical cardiac safety profile of nilotinib.
Dörken, B; Fateh-Moghadam, S; Giles, FJ; Grille, P; Haverkamp, W; Kim, TD; Köhncke, C; le Coutre, P; Levitin, M; Schwarz, M, 2012
)
0.38
" During a median follow-up of 44 months (range, 2-73), seven patients (9%), all of whom had received prior imatinib therapy, developed 11 clinical cardiac adverse events requiring treatment."( Clinical cardiac safety profile of nilotinib.
Dörken, B; Fateh-Moghadam, S; Giles, FJ; Grille, P; Haverkamp, W; Kim, TD; Köhncke, C; le Coutre, P; Levitin, M; Schwarz, M, 2012
)
0.38
"Whereas new electrocardiographic abnormalities were recorded in 20% of all patients and some of them developed severe or even life-threatening coronary artery disease, QT prolongation, changes in left ventricular ejection fraction, and clinical cardiac adverse events were uncommon in patients treated with nilotinib."( Clinical cardiac safety profile of nilotinib.
Dörken, B; Fateh-Moghadam, S; Giles, FJ; Grille, P; Haverkamp, W; Kim, TD; Köhncke, C; le Coutre, P; Levitin, M; Schwarz, M, 2012
)
0.38
" Sunitinib therapy was well tolerated, with most adverse events rated as grade 1 or 2 in severity."( Efficacy and safety of sunitinib in Chinese patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Gao, J; Hong, J; Li, J; Shen, L, 2012
)
0.38
"5 mg/day continuous daily dose sunitinib dosing schedule appears to be the optimal choice for Chinese patients due to a decreased incidence of adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of sunitinib in Chinese patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Gao, J; Hong, J; Li, J; Shen, L, 2012
)
0.38
" This rare but potentially fatal side effect has neither identified risk factors nor established treatment guideline."( Oxaliplatin-induced lung toxicity. Case report and review of the literature.
Abeni, C; Bertocchi, P; Prochilo, T; Zaniboni, A, 2012
)
0.38
"This analysis confirms a slight 2-year PFS advantage of high-dose imatinib, but imatinib dose escalation could not lead to any other major clinical benefits, and brought more toxic effects for patients."( Efficacy and safety evaluation of two doses of imatinib for the treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).
Chen, B; Wu, XT; Yang, P; Zhou, Y, 2012
)
0.38
" Drug-related adverse events were reported in 130 (98%) patients assigned regorafenib and 45 (68%) patients assigned placebo."( Efficacy and safety of regorafenib for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours after failure of imatinib and sunitinib (GRID): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.
Badalamenti, G; Bauer, S; Blackstein, M; Blay, JY; Casali, PG; Chung, J; Demetri, GD; Gelderblom, H; Hohenberger, P; Joensuu, H; Kang, YK; Kappeler, C; Kuss, I; Laurent, D; Le Cesne, A; Leahy, M; Maki, RG; Nguyen, BB; Nishida, T; Reichardt, P; Rutkowski, P; Schöffski, P; von Mehren, M; Xu, J, 2013
)
0.39
" The hematologic/cytogenetic response, progression-free-survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse effects (AE) of the pts were assessed."( [Study on efficiency and safety of dasatinib in Chinese patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia who are resistant or intolerant to imatinib].
Hu, JD; Huang, XJ; Jin, J; Li, JY; Liu, T; Meng, FY; Shen, ZX; Wang, JM; Wang, JX; Wu, DP, 2012
)
0.38
" Hand-foot syndrome was the most common adverse effect (25/48, 52."( [Efficacy and safety of sunitinib on patients with imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumor].
Chen, ZF; Chi, P; Guan, GX; Jiang, WZ; Liu, X; Lu, HS, 2013
)
0.39
" This review discusses the potential impact of treatment-, patient-, and disease-related characteristics on the emergence of adverse events during TKI therapy, with a focus on the underlying mechanisms believed to be responsible for a number of important adverse events associated with these agents and what implications they may have for treatment choice, particularly in the setting of first-line treatment."( Treatment-, patient-, and disease-related factors and the emergence of adverse events with tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia.
Irvine, E; Williams, C, 2013
)
0.39
" Monitoring plasma levels of imatinib allowed us to judge if levels were toxic or not and to avoid discontinuation of imatinib in some cases."( [Imatinib plasma levels in the management of cutaneous side effects induced by imatinib (Glivec®): 2 case reports].
Daghfous, R; El Aïdli, S; Gaïes, E; Klouz, A; Lakhal, M; Sahnoun, R; Sraïri, S; Trabelsi, S,
)
0.13
" (2) The drug-related adverse events were mostly grade 1/2 and were well-tolerated."( [Preliminary comparison of efficacy and safety of dasatinib and imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia].
Hu, JD; Huang, XJ; Shen, ZX; Wang, JX; Zhou, L, 2013
)
0.39
"Dasatinib is an effective and safe therapy option and can be used as first-line therapy for newly diagnosed CML-CP patients."( [Preliminary comparison of efficacy and safety of dasatinib and imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia].
Hu, JD; Huang, XJ; Shen, ZX; Wang, JX; Zhou, L, 2013
)
0.39
" Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in each cohort were primarily gastrointestinal (diarrhea [86%/83%/74%], nausea [46%/48%/48%], and vomiting [37%/38%/43%])."( Bosutinib safety and management of toxicity in leukemia patients with resistance or intolerance to imatinib and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Besson, N; Brümmendorf, TH; Cortes, JE; Durrant, S; Gambacorti-Passerini, C; Kantarjian, HM; Kelly, V; Khoury, HJ; Kim, DW; Leip, E; Martinelli, G; Porkka, K; Turnbull, K, 2014
)
0.4
" The patient was treated continuously with 400mg/day of imatinib mesylate with no significant adverse events, and the tumor gradually reduced in size."( [A case of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor in an elderly patient who was successfully treated with imatinib mesylate with no significant adverse events].
Abe, M; Gomi, K; Ikeda, Y; Kajikawa, S; Maruyama, K; Mihara, M; Shimada, K; Shirota, H, 2014
)
0.86
" After a 19-month median follow up, the safety profile of nilotinib 400 mg twice daily in patients switching from imatinib (n=35) was consistent with previous reports, and few new adverse events occurred in patients escalating from nilotinib 300 mg twice daily (n=19)."( Safety and efficacy of switching to nilotinib 400 mg twice daily for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase with suboptimal response or failure on front-line imatinib or nilotinib 300 mg twice daily.
Cervantes, F; Fan, X; Guilhot, F; Hochhaus, A; Hughes, TP; Kantarjian, HM; Kemp, C; Larson, RA; le Coutre, PD; Lobo, C; Menssen, HD; Niederwieser, D; Ossenkoppele, G; Rosti, G; Saglio, G; Shibayama, H, 2014
)
0.4
" This article describes the results of the first investigation in which genotoxic and acute toxic properties of the drug were studied in higher plants."( Assessment of genotoxicity and acute toxic effect of the imatinib mesylate in plant bioassays.
Filipič, M; Knasmueller, S; Kundi, M; Mišík, M; Pichler, C; Rainer, B, 2014
)
0.65
"2%); grade 3/4 drug-related non-hematologic adverse events included fatigue (3."( Efficacy and safety of radotinib in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients with resistance or intolerance to BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Cho, DJ; Choi, CW; Chung, JS; Do, YR; Jeong, SH; Jootar, S; Kim, DW; Kim, DY; Kim, H; Kim, HJ; Kim, JA; Kim, SH; Kim, YK; Kwak, JY; Lee, GY; Menon, H; Oh, SJ; Park, HL; Park, JS; Park, S; Saikia, T; Shin, HJ; Shin, JS; Sohn, SK; Zang, DY, 2014
)
0.4
" The most common toxicities were primarily gastrointestinal adverse events (diarrhea [84%], nausea [45%], vomiting [37%]), which were primarily mild to moderate, typically transient, and first occurred early during treatment."( Bosutinib efficacy and safety in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia after imatinib resistance or intolerance: Minimum 24-month follow-up.
Assouline, S; Besson, N; Brümmendorf, TH; Cervantes, F; Cortes, JE; Durrant, S; Gambacorti-Passerini, C; Jin, J; Kantarjian, HM; Kelly, V; Khoury, HJ; Kim, DW; Leip, E; Masszi, T; Mathews, V; Pasquini, R; Shen, ZX; Turkina, AG; Turnbull, K; Vellenga, E; Zaritskey, A, 2014
)
0.4
" Following the switch from branded imatinib to non-branded imatinib, 5/8 patients (63%) experienced treatment failure and 6/8 (75%) experienced severe and recurrent adverse events."( Deleterious effects of non-branded versions of imatinib used for the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: a case series on an escalating issue impacting patient safety.
Saavedra, D; Vizcarra, F, 2014
)
0.4
" The major adverse effects of combination therapy were rash, asthenia, edema and musculoskeletal events, and combination therapy was more prone to inducing neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and mild anemia."( [Efficacy and safety analysis of interferon combined with imatinib in treating chronic myeloid leukemia].
Bao, EN; Liu, Y; Lu, XC; Zhong, WW; Zhu, HL, 2014
)
0.4
" In particular, muco-cutaneous side effects represent the most frequent non-hematological adverse events."( Tyrosine kinase inhibitors: muco-cutaneous side effects at the microscope.
Brazzelli, V; Croci, G; Grasso, V; Vassallo, C, 2014
)
0.4
" Adverse events (AEs; any grade) with bosutinib versus imatinib were significantly more common for certain gastrointestinal events (diarrhea, 70% vs."( Safety of bosutinib versus imatinib in the phase 3 BELA trial in newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia.
Brümmendorf, TH; Cortes, JE; Dmoszynska, A; Duvillié, L; Gambacorti-Passerini, C; Gogat Marchant, K; Kantarjian, HM; Khattry, N; Lipton, JH; Pavlov, D; Rossiev, V; Wong, RS, 2014
)
0.4
"Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treatment relies on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), but their use can be associated with low-grade adverse events (AEs)."( Impact of low-grade adverse events on health-related quality of life in adult patients receiving imatinib or nilotinib for newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome positive chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase.
Chen, L; Guérin, A; Hiscock, R; Ionescu-Ittu, R; Keir, C; Marynchenko, M; Nitulescu, R; Wu, EQ, 2014
)
0.4
" Despite its increasing use in the pediatric population, there are limited data regarding adverse event profiles of imatinib mesylate in children, and few reports exist in the literature focusing on nonhematologic toxicity in this population."( Nonhematologic toxicity of imatinib mesylate in pediatric patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia: a predominance of musculoskeletal pain.
Gressett Ussery, SM; Heym, KM; Philpot, LM; Trinkman, H, 2015
)
0.92
"Rare but serious cardiovascular and pulmonary adverse events (AEs) have been reported in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with BCR-ABL inhibitors."( Cardiovascular and pulmonary adverse events in patients treated with BCR-ABL inhibitors: Data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.
Cortes, J; Malhotra, R; Mauro, M; Saglio, G; Steegmann, JL; Ukropec, JA; Wallis, NT, 2015
)
0.42
" Eight-year probabilities of adverse drug reactions (ADR) were 76%, of grades 3-4 22%, of non-hematologic 73%, and of hematologic 28%."( Safety and efficacy of imatinib in CML over a period of 10 years: data from the randomized CML-study IV.
Burchert, A; Dengler, J; Dietz, CT; Fabarius, A; Falge, C; Hanfstein, B; Hasford, J; Hehlmann, R; Heinrich, L; Hochhaus, A; Kalmanti, L; Kanz, L; Krause, SW; Lauseker, M; Müller, MC; Neubauer, A; Oppliger-Leibundgut, E; Pfirrmann, M; Pfreundschuh, M; Proetel, U; Rinaldetti, S; Saussele, S; Scheid, C; Spiekermann, K; Stegelmann, F, 2015
)
0.42
" With regard to safety issues, grade 3/4 non-hematologic adverse events (AEs) were infrequent."( A prospective analysis of clinical efficacy and safety in chronic myeloid leukemia-chronic phase patients with imatinib resistance or intolerance as evaluated using European LeukemiaNet 2013 criteria.
Akagi, T; Chou, T; Harigae, H; Ishida, Y; Ishizawa, K; Ito, S; Kimura, J; Kubo, K; Motegi, M; Murai, K; Noji, H; Oba, K; Ogawa, K; Sakamoto, J; Shimosegawa, K; Sugawara, T; Tajima, K; Yokoyama, H, 2015
)
0.42
"Patients with non-optimal responses (who meet ELN 2013 warning and failure criteria) to imatinib should be switched quickly to dasatinib, which is less toxic in CML-CP patients, to improve their prognoses."( A prospective analysis of clinical efficacy and safety in chronic myeloid leukemia-chronic phase patients with imatinib resistance or intolerance as evaluated using European LeukemiaNet 2013 criteria.
Akagi, T; Chou, T; Harigae, H; Ishida, Y; Ishizawa, K; Ito, S; Kimura, J; Kubo, K; Motegi, M; Murai, K; Noji, H; Oba, K; Ogawa, K; Sakamoto, J; Shimosegawa, K; Sugawara, T; Tajima, K; Yokoyama, H, 2015
)
0.42
"6%) and adverse events (31."( Long-term safety and efficacy of imatinib in pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Barst, RJ; Chang, HJ; Dario Vizza, C; Felser, JM; Frantz, RP; Frost, AE; Fukumoto, Y; Galié, N; Ghofrani, HA; Hassoun, PM; Hoeper, MM; Klose, H; Lawrence, D; Matsubara, H; Morrell, NW; Peacock, AJ; Pfeifer, M; Quinn, DA; Simonneau, G; Tapson, VF; Torres, F; Yang, W, 2015
)
0.42
"Severe adverse events, significant side effects, and a high discontinuation rate limit the utility of imatinib in the treatment of PAH."( Long-term safety and efficacy of imatinib in pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Barst, RJ; Chang, HJ; Dario Vizza, C; Felser, JM; Frantz, RP; Frost, AE; Fukumoto, Y; Galié, N; Ghofrani, HA; Hassoun, PM; Hoeper, MM; Klose, H; Lawrence, D; Matsubara, H; Morrell, NW; Peacock, AJ; Pfeifer, M; Quinn, DA; Simonneau, G; Tapson, VF; Torres, F; Yang, W, 2015
)
0.42
" Compared with the HR group, the TKI+HR group had no increase in the toxic responses to chemotherapy and had a decrease in the infection rate during the induction period."( [Efficacy and safety of imatinib for the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children].
Chen, XJ; Guo, Y; Liu, F; Liu, TF; Liu, XM; Qi, BQ; Ruan, M; Wang, SC; Yang, WY; Zhang, JY; Zhang, L; Zhu, XF; Zou, Y, 2015
)
0.42
" Adverse cutaneous reactions induced by imatinib are frequent, generally moderate, and dose-dependent."( Possible Role of Interleukin-31/33 Axis in Imatinib Mesylate-Associated Skin Toxicity.
Allegra, A; Alonci, A; Calapai, G; Gangemi, S; Maisano, V; Mannucci, C; Musolino, C; Russo, S, 2015
)
0.68
" Although all TKIs are associated with nonhematologic adverse events (AEs), experience with imatinib suggested that toxicities are typically manageable and apparent early during drug development."( Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor-Associated Cardiovascular Toxicity in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.
Deininger, M; Moslehi, JJ, 2015
)
0.42
"The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of major cytogenetic response (MCyR) and adverse events with nilotinib in adults with imatinib-resistant Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)."( Response and Adverse Effects of Nilotinib in Imatinib-resistant Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients: Data From a Developing Country.
Hussain, S; Usman Shaikh, M, 2015
)
0.42
" The frequency of adverse effects was assessed at 6 months, and the patient overall survival was calculated after 3 years."( Response and Adverse Effects of Nilotinib in Imatinib-resistant Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients: Data From a Developing Country.
Hussain, S; Usman Shaikh, M, 2015
)
0.42
" The most frequent nonhematologic adverse events were myalgia and headache."( Response and Adverse Effects of Nilotinib in Imatinib-resistant Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients: Data From a Developing Country.
Hussain, S; Usman Shaikh, M, 2015
)
0.42
"The nilotinib response rates were higher in chronic phase patients, and the most common adverse events were thrombocytopenia, myalgia, and headache."( Response and Adverse Effects of Nilotinib in Imatinib-resistant Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients: Data From a Developing Country.
Hussain, S; Usman Shaikh, M, 2015
)
0.42
" The hematologic, cytogenetic and molecular responses were assessed at 3- and 6-month, and adverse effects were evaluated throughout the study."( [A prospective, multi-centre clinical trial to evaluate the early clinical efficacy and safety of a generic imatinib in treating patients with chronic phase of chronic myelogenous leukemia].
DU, X; Han, X; Hou, M; Hu, J; Jiang, Q; Jin, J; Li, Y; Liu, B; Liu, T; Ma, J; Meng, F; Shen, Z; Wu, D; Zhao, D, 2015
)
0.42
" No adverse effects related death occurred."( [A prospective, multi-centre clinical trial to evaluate the early clinical efficacy and safety of a generic imatinib in treating patients with chronic phase of chronic myelogenous leukemia].
DU, X; Han, X; Hou, M; Hu, J; Jiang, Q; Jin, J; Li, Y; Liu, B; Liu, T; Ma, J; Meng, F; Shen, Z; Wu, D; Zhao, D, 2015
)
0.42
" In this study, we investigated the toxic potential of the mixture of 5-FU + IM + ET against green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata and cyanobacterium Synechococcus leopoliensis, and the stability and sorption of these drugs to algal cells."( Toxicity of the mixture of selected antineoplastic drugs against aquatic primary producers.
Barceló, D; Brezovsek, P; de Alda, ML; Elersek, T; Filipič, M; Heath, E; Korošec, M; Milavec, S; Negreira, N; Ščančar, J; Zonja, B, 2016
)
0.43
"This review describes key efficacy data on imatinib for the treatment of GIST, and focuses on safety and tolerability of imatinib, with emphasis on common adverse events management and long term toxicity profile."( A safety evaluation of imatinib mesylate in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor.
Ben Ami, E; Demetri, GD, 2016
)
0.74
" The toxicity profile of imatinib has been well characterized, and although the majority of patients experience an adverse event during treatment with imatinib, these side effects are usually mild and manageable, with the majority of patients continuing treatment uninterruptedly."( A safety evaluation of imatinib mesylate in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor.
Ben Ami, E; Demetri, GD, 2016
)
0.74
" We evaluated vascular/cardiac toxicities associated with long-term bosutinib treatment for Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) leukemia based on treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and changes in QTc intervals and ejection fraction in two studies: a phase 1/2 study of second-/third-/fourth-line bosutinib for Ph+ leukemia resistant/intolerant to prior TKIs (N = 570) and a phase 3 study of first-line bosutinib (n = 248) versus imatinib (n = 251) in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia."( Long-term evaluation of cardiac and vascular toxicity in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias treated with bosutinib.
Aguiar, JM; Brümmendorf, TH; Cortes, JE; Dimitrov, S; Durand, JB; Fly, KD; Gambacorti-Passerini, C; Jean Khoury, H; Kantarjian, H; Leip, E; Lipton, JH; Matczak, E; Mauro, MJ; Pavlov, D; Shapiro, M, 2016
)
0.43
"Many patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase experience chronic treatment-related adverse events (AEs) during imatinib therapy."( Evaluating the Impact of a Switch to Nilotinib on Imatinib-Related Chronic Low-Grade Adverse Events in Patients With CML-CP: The ENRICH Study.
Akard, LP; Busque, L; Cortes, JE; Keir, C; Lin, FP; Lipton, JH; Mauro, MJ; Miller, CB; Pinilla-Ibarz, J; Warsi, G, 2016
)
0.43
"In the phase II ENRICH (Exploring Nilotinib to Reduce Imatinib Related Chronic Adverse Events) study (N = 52), the effect of switching patients with imatinib-related chronic low-grade nonhematologic AEs from imatinib to nilotinib was evaluated."( Evaluating the Impact of a Switch to Nilotinib on Imatinib-Related Chronic Low-Grade Adverse Events in Patients With CML-CP: The ENRICH Study.
Akard, LP; Busque, L; Cortes, JE; Keir, C; Lin, FP; Lipton, JH; Mauro, MJ; Miller, CB; Pinilla-Ibarz, J; Warsi, G, 2016
)
0.43
" The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse event was a hand-foot skin reaction (25%)."( Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib in Korean Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor after Failure of Imatinib and Sunitinib: A Multicenter Study Based on the Management Access Program.
Im, SA; Kang, YK; Kim, TY; Lee, SJ; Park, JO; Park, SR; Ryoo, BY; Ryu, MH; Son, MK, 2017
)
0.46
" The most common Glivec related adverse effects were edema (n=278, 51% ), fatigue (n=218, 40% ), gastrointestinal disorders (n=190, 35%), muscle cramps (n=118, 22%), skin color changes (n=118, 22%), weight gain (n=71, 13%), rash (n=60, 11%), hepatic function abnormality (n=55, 10%), and cytopenia (n=38, 7%)."( [The impact of Glivec related side effects on daily life in Chinese patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase].
Huang, XJ; Jiang, Q; Wang, HB; Yu, L, 2016
)
0.43
" The most frequently reported adverse reactions (>30%) include edema, nausea, vomiting, muscle cramps, musculoskeletal pain, diarrhea, rash, fatigue and abdominal pain."( New Drug and Possible New Toxicity - Squamous Cell Carcinoma Following Imatinib in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.
Inayat, F; Saif, MW, 2016
)
0.43
"0ng/L, which are several orders of magnitude lower from those that caused adverse effects in fish and human derived cells."( Assessment of the genotoxicity of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib mesylate in cultured fish and human cells.
Filipič, M; Gajski, G; Garaj-Vrhovac, V; Gerić, M; Novak, M; Nunić, J; Žegura, B, 2017
)
0.69
"BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are established treatments for chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML); however, they are associated with infrequent, but clinically serious adverse events (AEs)."( Healthcare and economic burden of adverse events among patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia treated with BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Bilmes, R; Lin, J; Lingohr-Smith, M; Makenbaeva, D, 2017
)
0.46
" Most (85%; n = 144) adverse events were mild."( Generic Imatinib Therapy Among Jordanians: An Observational Assessment of Efficacy and Safety in Routine Clinical Practice.
Abbasi, S; Alrabi, K; Awidi, A; Kheirallah, KA, 2017
)
0.46
"Short-term mucocutaneous adverse effects are well documented with imatinib."( Long-term mucocutaneous adverse effects of imatinib in Indian chronic myeloid leukemia patients.
Dogra, S; Handa, S; Khadwal, A; Kumari, S; Lad, D; Malhotra, P; Prakash, G; Suri, V; Varma, S; Vinay, K; Yanamandra, U, 2018
)
0.48
"To study the long-term mucocutaneous adverse effects of imatinib and factors predicting these adverse effects."( Long-term mucocutaneous adverse effects of imatinib in Indian chronic myeloid leukemia patients.
Dogra, S; Handa, S; Khadwal, A; Kumari, S; Lad, D; Malhotra, P; Prakash, G; Suri, V; Varma, S; Vinay, K; Yanamandra, U, 2018
)
0.48
"98 cutaneous adverse effects were seen per patient."( Long-term mucocutaneous adverse effects of imatinib in Indian chronic myeloid leukemia patients.
Dogra, S; Handa, S; Khadwal, A; Kumari, S; Lad, D; Malhotra, P; Prakash, G; Suri, V; Varma, S; Vinay, K; Yanamandra, U, 2018
)
0.48
"Cutaneous hyperpigmentation and periorbital edema are common long-term adverse effects of imatinib in Indian patients."( Long-term mucocutaneous adverse effects of imatinib in Indian chronic myeloid leukemia patients.
Dogra, S; Handa, S; Khadwal, A; Kumari, S; Lad, D; Malhotra, P; Prakash, G; Suri, V; Varma, S; Vinay, K; Yanamandra, U, 2018
)
0.48
" Hypertension (20%; 95% CI 7-33), hand-foot skin reaction (22%; 95% CI 17-27), and hypophosphatemia (18%; 95% CI 5-41) were common grade ≥3 regorafenib-related adverse events in patients treated with regorafenib after failure with imatinib and sunitinib treatments."( Efficacy and safety of regorafenib for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor after failure with imatinib and sunitinib treatment: A meta-analysis.
Jiang, T; Piao, D; Wang, W; Zhang, Z, 2017
)
0.46
" Close monitoring and appropriate management of grade ≥3 regorafenib-related adverse events should be considered during treatment."( Efficacy and safety of regorafenib for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor after failure with imatinib and sunitinib treatment: A meta-analysis.
Jiang, T; Piao, D; Wang, W; Zhang, Z, 2017
)
0.46
" Adverse events were consistent with those reported in other nilotinib studies."( Efficacy and safety of switching to nilotinib in patients with CML-CP in major molecular response to imatinib: results of a multicenter phase II trial (NILSw trial).
Akashi, K; Hino, M; Hirase, C; Ishikawa, J; Kamimura, T; Kanakura, Y; Kawaguchi, T; Kuroda, J; Matsumura, I; Matsuoka, KI; Miyamoto, T; Nakamae, H; Shibayama, H; Shimose, T, 2018
)
0.48
"Some patients receiving a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for the first-line treatment of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) experience intolerable adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of nilotinib 300 mg twice daily in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase who are intolerant to prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors: Results from the Phase IIIb ENESTswift study.
Anderson, L; Branford, S; D'Rozario, J; Gervasio, O; Hiwase, D; Hughes, T; Irving, I; Levetan, C; Powell, A; Roberts, W; Solterbeck, A; Tan, P; Taper, J; Traficante, R; Wright, M; Yeung, DT, 2018
)
0.48
" Of the non-hematological adverse events associated with intolerance to prior imatinib or dasatinib, 74% resolved within 12 weeks of switching to nilotinib 300 mg bid."( Efficacy and safety of nilotinib 300 mg twice daily in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase who are intolerant to prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors: Results from the Phase IIIb ENESTswift study.
Anderson, L; Branford, S; D'Rozario, J; Gervasio, O; Hiwase, D; Hughes, T; Irving, I; Levetan, C; Powell, A; Roberts, W; Solterbeck, A; Tan, P; Taper, J; Traficante, R; Wright, M; Yeung, DT, 2018
)
0.48
"Chronic, low-grade adverse events are common in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who are treated with imatinib."( Outcomes of switching to dasatinib after imatinib-related low-grade adverse events in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: the DASPERSE study.
Abruzzese, E; Kim, DW; Mohamed, H; Pinilla-Ibarz, J; Rong, Y; Saussele, S; Williams, LA; Zyczynski, T, 2018
)
0.48
" To prevent adverse side effects of drugs, it is important to investigate potential toxicity in vitro."( ATP-based cell viability assay is superior to trypan blue exclusion and XTT assay in measuring cytotoxicity of anticancer drugs Taxol and Imatinib, and proteasome inhibitor MG-132 on human hepatoma cell line HepG2.
Kammerer, S; Küpper, JH; Nowak, E, 2018
)
0.48
"This multicenter cooperative study aimed to analyze the adverse events (AEs) associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) used as initial treatment for chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) and their impact on outcome."( Severe adverse events by tyrosine kinase inhibitors decrease survival rates in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia.
Fukuhara, T; Haseyama, Y; Hirayama, Y; Ikeda, H; Imamura, M; Ishihara, T; Ito, S; Kakinoki, Y; Kobayashi, H; Kobayashi, R; Kohda, K; Kondo, T; Kuroda, H; Kurosawa, M; Matsukawa, T; Mori, A; Nishio, M; Ota, S; Sakai, H; Sarashina, T; Sato, K; Shindo, M; Takahashi, T; Yamamoto, M; Yamamoto, S; Yoshida, M, 2018
)
0.48
" Most adverse events initially occurred within two years."( Safety and efficacy of second-line bosutinib for chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia over a five-year period: final results of a phase I/II study.
Bardy-Bouxin, N; Brümmendorf, TH; Cortes, JE; Crescenzo, R; DeAnnuntis, L; Gambacorti-Passerini, C; Kantarjian, HM; Khoury, HJ; Kim, DW; Leip, E; Lipton, JH; Noonan, K; Schafhausen, P; Shapiro, M, 2018
)
0.48
" On the brink of commercialization of generic imatinib, this study aims to evaluate the therapeutic pattern of CP-CML and the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) over a decade of local real clinical practice."( Pattern of Use and Long-Term Safety of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Decade of Real-World Management of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.
Bettiol, A; Chinellato, A; Crescioli, G; Gherlinzoni, F; Giusti, P; Lombardi, N; Marconi, E; Vannacci, A; Walley, T, 2018
)
0.48
" The adverse event (AE) profile of dasatinib at 4 years was similar to that at 6 and 18 months."( Four-year follow-up of patients with imatinib-resistant or intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia receiving dasatinib: efficacy and safety.
Hu, J; Huang, X; Jiang, Q; Jin, J; Li, J; Liu, T; Meng, F; Shen, Z; Wang, J; Wu, D, 2019
)
0.51
" The NMAs were built for six outcomes at 12 months: complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), major cytogenetic response (MCyR), deep molecular response, major molecular response (MMR), complete haematologic response and incidence of serious adverse events."( Comparative efficacy and safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for chronic myeloid leukaemia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Aguiar, KS; Fachi, MM; Fernandez-Llimos, F; Figueiredo, BC; Lenzi, L; Leonart, LP; Pontarolo, R; Tonin, FS, 2018
)
0.48
"5 months after switch to generic imatinib, 17% of patients reported new or worsening side effects, but grade 3-4 non-hematological adverse events were rare."( Safety and efficacy of switching from branded to generic imatinib in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated in Italy.
Basso, M; Bertoldero, G; Binotto, G; Bonalumi, A; Bonifacio, M; D'Amore, F; Danini, M; De Biasi, E; Fanin, R; Fortuna, S; Frison, L; Griguolo, D; Krampera, M; Marin, L; Miggiano, MC; Minotto, C; Pizzolo, G; Ruggeri, M; Sartori, R; Scaffidi, L; Semenzato, G; Stulle, M; Tinelli, M; Tiribelli, M, 2018
)
0.48
" Although 12 patients experienced vascular adverse events, no new safety issues were observed in patients with adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia over a 5-year period: results from the Japanese registry obtained by the New TARGET system.
Inokuchi, K; Iriyama, N; Kawaguchi, T; Kizaki, M; Kurokawa, M; Matsumura, I; Nakamura, F; Nakaseko, C; Naoe, T; Ohnishi, K; Okamoto, S; Ono, T; Sumi, M; Suzuki, R; Takahashi, N; Usui, N; Yamamoto, K, 2019
)
0.51
"Cardiovascular or arteriothrombotic adverse events (CV- or AT-AEs) are reported in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs)."( Analysis of cardiovascular and arteriothrombotic adverse events in chronic-phase CML patients after frontline TKIs.
Ahaneku, H; Boddu, PC; Borthakur, G; Cortes, JE; Estrov, Z; Garcia-Manero, G; Jabbour, E; Jain, P; Kadia, TM; Kantarjian, H; Nogueras-González, GM; O'Brien, S; Ravandi, F; Sam, P; Sasaki, K; Verstovsek, S, 2019
)
0.51
"2%) had grade 1-2 adverse events (AEs) and 12 patients (41."( Activity and Safety of Palbociclib in Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Refractory to Imatinib and Sunitinib: A Biomarker-driven Phase II Study.
Bellera, CA; Blay, JY; Boidot, R; Bompas, E; Bouche, O; Duffaud, F; Esnaud, T; Geneste, D; Ghiringhelli, F; Isambert, N; Italiano, A; Le Loarer, F; Lucchesi, C; Mir, O; Penel, N; Toulmonde, M, 2019
)
0.51
" The dire clinical course of paediatric CML is further exacerbated by the adverse effects of long-term imatinib therapy."( Efficacy and Safety of Imatinib in Paediatric CML - A Single Centre Study.
Grzeszkiewicz, K; Pawelec, K; Pieluszczak, K; Smeding, C; Szydło, A,
)
0.13
"There is little information about cardiovascular adverse event (CV-AE) incidence in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients treated with bosutinib in the real-life practice."( Incidence and evaluation of predisposition to cardiovascular toxicity in chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with bosutinib in the real-life practice.
Abruzzese, E; Annunziata, M; Baratè, C; Binotto, G; Bonifacio, M; Breccia, M; Caocci, G; Cattaneo, D; De Gregorio, F; Elena, C; Foà, R; Fozza, C; Galimberti, S; Iurlo, A; La Nasa, G; Luciano, L; Martino, B; Molica, M; Mulas, O; Orlandi, EM; Russo Rossi, A; Sgherza, N; Trawinska, MM, 2019
)
0.51
" Pleural effusion is a frequent side effect in patients during dasatinib treatment."( Lupus-like symptoms with anti-RNP/Sm and anti-nuclear antibodies positivity: An extremely rare adverse event of dasatinib.
Bakanay, SM; Dilek, I; Kucuksahin, O; Maral, S, 2020
)
0.56
" After switching, 15 (39%) patients reported new or worsening adverse events, including 5 (13%) patients with edema, 8 (21%) muscle cramps, 7 (18%) nausea, 6 (16%) diarrhea, and 5 (13%) fatigue."( Efficacy and safety of generic imatinib after switching from original imatinib in patients treated for chronic myeloid leukemia in the United States.
Abou Dalle, I; Borthakur, G; Burger, J; Cortes, J; Estrov, Z; Garcia-Manero, G; Jabbour, E; Kantarjian, H; Ohanian, M; Ravandi, F; Verstovsek, S, 2019
)
0.51
" Adverse events noted were mild and well tolerated."( Efficacy and safety of generic imatinib after switching from original imatinib in patients treated for chronic myeloid leukemia in the United States.
Abou Dalle, I; Borthakur, G; Burger, J; Cortes, J; Estrov, Z; Garcia-Manero, G; Jabbour, E; Kantarjian, H; Ohanian, M; Ravandi, F; Verstovsek, S, 2019
)
0.51
" All patients experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event (AE), including diarrhoea (80."( Efficacy and safety of TAS-116, an oral inhibitor of heat shock protein 90, in patients with metastatic or unresectable gastrointestinal stromal tumour refractory to imatinib, sunitinib and regorafenib: a phase II, single-arm trial.
Doi, T; Komatsu, Y; Kurokawa, Y; Naito, Y; Nishida, T; Ohkubo, S; Ozaka, M; Sawaki, A; Takahashi, T, 2019
)
0.51
"In this multicenter, open-label, single-arm trial, safety was assessed based on the frequency of adverse events (AEs)."( Safety of Imatinib Mesylate in a Multicenter Expanded Access Program in Adult Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in the Adjuvant Setting.
Barone, C; Bauer, S; Castellana, R; Crippa, S; Delgado Perez, JR; Fumagalli, E; Le Cesne, A; Melichar, B; Papai, Z; Prausova, J; Pustowka, A; Quiering, C; Reichardt, P; Schlemmer, M, 2019
)
0.92
"Hematological toxicity is a common adverse effect of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)."( Marrow fibrosis is an independent predictor of hematological toxicity of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia.
Hong, J; Li, Q; Ni, J; Sun, G; Xia, R; Zeng, Q; Zhang, Z, 2020
)
0.56
" None of the patients in this group had treatment-related deaths or IM discontinuation due to drug toxicities, and only 1 patient had a grade III-IV nonhematologic adverse event."( Clinical efficacy and safety of imatinib treatment in children and adolescents with chronic myeloid leukemia: A single-center experience in China.
An, X; Deng, M; Guan, X; Wen, X; Xiao, J; Yu, J, 2020
)
0.56
" However, the novel strategy is required to reduce life-threatening adverse effects of PNT including ischemic cardiovascular disease."( Involvement of MCL1, c-myc, and cyclin D2 protein degradation in ponatinib-induced cytotoxicity against T315I(+) Ph+leukemia cells.
Abe, A; Hayakawa, F; Ichihara, M; Inoue, C; Kawamoto, Y; Murate, T; Nishizawa, Y; Nozawa, Y; Sobue, S; Suzuki, M, 2020
)
0.56
" Adverse cardiovascular events were recorded in both groups."( Cardiovascular Toxicity in Cancer Patients Treated with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Real-World Single-Center Experience.
Accurso, V; Badalamenti, G; Bronte, E; Di Lisi, D; Macaione, F; Novo, G; Novo, S; Rinaldi, G; Russo, A; Siragusa, S, 2020
)
0.56
"Our study confirms that imatinib is a relatively safe drug, while it reveals that the latest-generation TKIs may cause a burden of cardiovascular complications."( Cardiovascular Toxicity in Cancer Patients Treated with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Real-World Single-Center Experience.
Accurso, V; Badalamenti, G; Bronte, E; Di Lisi, D; Macaione, F; Novo, G; Novo, S; Rinaldi, G; Russo, A; Siragusa, S, 2020
)
0.56
" The most common adverse events were diarrhoea (76%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (60%), fatigue (50%), hypertension (42%), weight loss (40%) and oral mucositis (30%), with 32 (64%) patients requiring dose reductions, 27 (54%) having treatment interruptions and no cabozantinib-related deaths observed."( Activity and safety of the multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor cabozantinib in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour after treatment with imatinib and sunitinib: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer phase II tri
Ali, N; Benson, C; Blay, JY; Cousin, S; Dileo, P; Gelderblom, H; Italiano, A; Kasper, B; Kopeckova, K; LeCesne, A; Litiere, S; Marreaud, S; Menge, F; Mir, O; Nzokirantevye, A; Papai, Z; Schöffski, P; Vanden Bempt, I; Wardelmann, E; Wozniak, A; Zaffaroni, F, 2020
)
0.56
" The objective of this study is to develop a target-oriented drug carrier to minimize these adverse effects by the controlled release of the drug."( Encapsulation of Imatinib in Targeted KIT-5 Nanoparticles for Reducing its Cardiotoxicity and Hepatotoxicity.
Fardshouraki, S; Jandaghian, S; Mirian, M; Safaeian, L; Taymouri, S; Varshosaz, J, 2020
)
0.56
" The most common adverse events were anemia, proteinuria, fatigue, neutropenia, and diarrhea."( A prospective multicenter phase II study on the efficacy and safety of dasatinib in the treatment of metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors failed by imatinib and sunitinib and analysis of NGS in peripheral blood.
Li, J; Li, Y; Liu, X; Shen, L; Wu, X; Zhang, B; Zhang, X; Zhou, Y, 2020
)
0.56
" All results suggest that the ultra-long circulating pro-drug NP may provide an effective and safe therapeutic strategy for BCR-ABL-positive CML."( An ultra-long circulating nanoparticle for reviving a highly selective BCR-ABL inhibitor in long-term effective and safe treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia.
Fu, L; Liang, H; Liang, X; Liu, J; Liu, Q; Shi, J; Wang, B; Wang, J; Zou, F, 2020
)
0.56
" Safety was assessed according to the occurrence of adverse events."( Evaluation of the use, effectiveness and safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myelogenous leukaemia in a general university hospital.
Escudero-Vilaplana, V; González-Haba, E; Marquinez-Alonso, I; Osorio, S; Rodriguez-Gonzalez, CG; Sanjurjo-Sáez, M, 2020
)
0.56
" Finally, regarding safety, the authors found a pooled dropout rate due to all adverse events of 22% and a rate of serious adverse events of 17%."( Efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate in systemic sclerosis. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ciaffi, J; Ciccia, F; Cipriani, P; Giacomelli, R; Liakouli, V; Meliconi, R; Ruscitti, P; Ursini, F, 2020
)
0.87
" Adverse effects, if any, were documented as per the NCI-CTCAE criteria v4."( Efficacy and safety profile of generic imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia-chronic phase: sharing experience of a hemato-oncology center from eastern India.
Dolai, TK; Mandal, PK; Phukan, A, 2021
)
0.62
"Cutaneous adverse effects (AE) related to tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) drugs have been mainly described as case reports."( Cutaneous side effects in a cohort of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: General description and further characterization, correlation with photoexposition and study of hypopigmentation as treatment's prognosti
Daudén, E; García-Diez, A; Llamas-Velasco, M; Ovejero-Merino, E; Requena, L; Steegmann, JL, 2020
)
0.56
" Moreover, prolonged treatment produces various adverse effects, such as serious vascular adverse events including stroke, myocardial infarction, and peripheral arterial occlusive disease."( [Management of vascular adverse events during tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia].
Takaku, T, 2020
)
0.56
" However, it can cause some serious adverse effects."( Sigmoid Sinus Thrombosis Followed by Splenic Infarction Due to Imatinib Therapy in a Patient with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor; Hematological Side Effects of Imatinib.
Demirağ, G; Yılmaz, A; Yilmaz, H, 2021
)
0.62
" Treatment-emergent adverse events in both subpopulations were consistent with the primary BFORE results."( Efficacy and safety of bosutinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in the Asian subpopulation of the phase 3 BFORE trial.
Brümmendorf, TH; Chuah, C; Cortes, JE; Do, YR; Koh, LP; Numbenjapon, T; Ohkura, M; Ong, KH; Ono, C; Viqueira, A; Zang, DY, 2021
)
0.62
" There were significantly more hematologic adverse events (AEs) in elderly patients (P = ."( Efficacy and Safety of Imatinib Treatment in Elderly Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Real-Life Data and a Single-Center Experience.
Ar, MC; Aydın, Y; Başlar, Z; Bayraktar, EA; Bektaş, F; Elverdi, T; Eşkazan, AE; Keskin, D; Öngören, Ş; Özgür Yurttaş, N; Özmen, D; Öztaş, M; Sadri, S; Salihoğlu, A; Soysal, T, 2021
)
0.62
" The most common all-cause adverse events were increased blood bilirubin (53."( A phase 2 study of nilotinib in pediatric patients with CML: long-term update on growth retardation and safety.
Aimone, P; Allepuz, A; Bautista, F; Ducassou, S; Dufour, C; Goto, H; Guinipero, T; Hijiya, N; Kang, HJ; Karakas, Z; Maschan, A; Millot, F; Patterson, B; Rizzari, C; Samis, J; Shimada, H; Sosothikul, D; Titorenko, K; Yoo, KH; Zwaan, CM, 2021
)
0.62
" Imatinib + SOC-treated participants exhibited no increase in number or severity of adverse events, a significantly accelerated decline in parasite density and pyrexia, and no DPC."( Imatinib augments standard malaria combination therapy without added toxicity.
Chien, HD; Kesely, KR; Low, PS; Noomuna, P; Pantaleo, A; Putt, KS; Tuan, TA; Turrini, FM, 2021
)
0.62
" We extracted data on the trial and patient characteristics, and the following primary outcomes: all-cause mortality, the ratios of virological cure, and treatment-emergent adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of current medications for treating severe and non-severe COVID-19 patients: an updated network meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials.
Chen, J; Cheng, Q; Fang, Z; Jia, Q; Zhao, G, 2021
)
0.62
" However, some patients may require dose reductions to manage the occurrences of adverse events (AEs)."( Efficacy and safety following bosutinib dose reduction in patients with Philadelphia chromosome‒positive leukemias.
An, F; Brümmendorf, TH; Cortes, JE; Crescenzo, RJ; Ferdinand, R; Gambacorti-Passerini, C; Kim, DW; Kota, V; Leip, E; Lipton, JH, 2021
)
0.62
" Measurements included medications, follow-ups, adverse events, allogeneic stem cell transplantation and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)."( Safety and cost-effectiveness of ponatinib versus other tyrosine kinase inhibitors as second-line therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in the United States.
Guo, JJ; Hincapie, AL; Li, Y; Yue, X, 2022
)
0.72
" Within this context, we present a case of a 25-year-old woman diagnosed with Ph+ ALL during the third trimester and the safe and effective use of imatinib as treatment after failure of conventional chemotherapy."( Safe and Effective Use of Imatinib to Treat Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia During Pregnancy.
Ashraf, S; Bachiashvili, K; Bhatia, R; Jamy, O; Rangaraju, S; Vachhani, P; Wolfson, J, 2022
)
0.72
" A total of four treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred during the study."( Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple topical ophthalmic administration of imatinib mesylate in healthy subjects.
Chung, JY; Huh, KY; Hyon, JY; Koo, HC; Lee, JH; Na, JY; You, JC; Yu, KS, 2022
)
0.94
" Ponatinib, a third generation TKI, has shown a relatively high incidence of serious adverse effects including thrombotic vascular occlusion and heart failure, particularly in patients with a prior history of cardiovascular impairment."( Cardiovascular Toxicity Associated With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy In Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.
Al Nahedh, M; Aljurf, M; Baqal, OJ; Binzaid, AA; Samarkandi, HH; Soheib, M, 2021
)
0.62
" We evaluated patients' treatments with or without AC, completion rates, adverse events (AEs), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS)."( Real-world data on the efficacy and safety of adjuvant chemotherapy in Japanese patients with a high-risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumor recurrence.
Doki, Y; Eguchi, H; Hirota, S; Kawabata, R; Kurokawa, Y; Makino, T; Motoori, M; Nakajima, K; Nishida, T; Nishikawa, K; Omori, T; Saito, T; Takahashi, T; Tanaka, K; Teranishi, R; Ushimaru, Y; Yamamoto, K; Yamashita, K, 2022
)
0.72
"8%) patients experienced Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Grade 2 or higher AEs."( Real-world data on the efficacy and safety of adjuvant chemotherapy in Japanese patients with a high-risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumor recurrence.
Doki, Y; Eguchi, H; Hirota, S; Kawabata, R; Kurokawa, Y; Makino, T; Motoori, M; Nakajima, K; Nishida, T; Nishikawa, K; Omori, T; Saito, T; Takahashi, T; Tanaka, K; Teranishi, R; Ushimaru, Y; Yamamoto, K; Yamashita, K, 2022
)
0.72
" This study aimed to evaluate the response and the adverse events of treatment with imatinib mesylate (IM) compared to conventional therapy using vinblastine and prednisolone (VP) in canine cutaneous MCTs."( Imatinib Mesylate for the Treatment of Canine Mast Cell Tumors: Assessment of the Response and Adverse Events in Comparison with the Conventional Therapy with Vinblastine and Prednisone.
Alexandre, PA; Brandão, PE; Casagrande, TAC; Dagli, MLZ; de Queiroz, GF; Fukumasu, H; Macedo, TR; Matera, JM; Melo, SR; Pinto, ACBCF, 2022
)
2.39
"Imatinib (IM), a milestone drug used in the field of molecular targeted therapy, has been reported to cause serious adverse liver effects, including liver failure and even death."( Imatinib-induced hepatotoxicity via oxidative stress and activation of NLRP3 inflammasome: an in vitro and in vivo study.
Cheng, ZP; Fang, WT; Huang, FR; Shen, Y; Sun, LN; Wang, DJ; Wang, YQ, 2022
)
0.72
" However, other proteins are also inhibited, so they can cause a wide range of adverse effects (AEs)."( [Prevalence of Adverse Effects of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Used in Management of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia at Sidi Bel-Abbès University Hospital Center].
Belfrak, F; Beloufa, S; Benlazar, M; Benmehimda, NC; Mahi, E; Matmour, D; Merad, Y; Si-Ali, N; Toumi, H, 2022
)
0.72
" Safety endpoints included the incidence and severity of adverse events (AE)."( Efficacy and Safety of Ripretinib in Chinese Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors as a Fourth- or Later-Line Therapy: A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Open-Label Phase II Study.
Cai, S; Cao, H; Deng, Y; Dong, J; Huang, Z; Li, J; Shen, L; Wu, X; Zhang, J; Zhou, Y, 2022
)
0.72
" No grade 4 adverse events were observed."( Efficacy and Safety of Generic Dasatinib in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase: A Multicenter Prospective Study in China.
Du, X; Jin, J; Liu, P; Lou, J; Meng, L; Wang, W; Yu, W, 2022
)
0.72
" Severe cardiac adverse events were monitored for 28 days or until death occurred."( Cardiac Safety of Imatinib for the Treatment of COVID-19: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Aman, J; Bogaard, HJ; de Man, FS; Duijvelaar, E; Pinto, Y; Schippers, JR; Smeele, PJ; Vanhove, A, 2022
)
0.72
"Endoscopic resection for intermediate-risk gastric GIST is a feasible and safe method, and there is no significant benefit for patients with intermediate-risk gastric GIST to accept imatinib adjuvant treatment after ER."( Comparison of Safety and Outcomes between Endoscopic and Surgical Resections of Intermediate-Risk Primary Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.
Hassan, S; Liu, J; Ni, M; Ren, X; Wang, L; Xu, G; Yang, J; Zhu, T; Zou, X, 2023
)
0.91
" We extracted data on trials and patient characteristics, and the following primary outcomes: all-cause mortality (ACM), and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)."( Comparative efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions for severe COVID-19 patients: An updated network meta-analysis of 48 randomized controlled trials.
Chen, J; Cheng, Q; Fang, Z; Jia, Q; Zhao, G, 2022
)
0.72
" We found that most medications were safe in treating severe COVID-19."( Comparative efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions for severe COVID-19 patients: An updated network meta-analysis of 48 randomized controlled trials.
Chen, J; Cheng, Q; Fang, Z; Jia, Q; Zhao, G, 2022
)
0.72
"Sunitinib therapy for patients with imatinib-resistant and/or intolerant gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) often causes severe adverse events (AEs) that lead to treatment discontinuation."( Sunitinib therapy for imatinib-resistant and/or intolerant gastrointestinal stromal tumors: comparison of safety and efficacy between standard and reduced dosage regimens.
Hirota, S; Ishikawa, T; Kanda, T; Matsumoto, Y; Saijo, Y; Sasaki, K, 2023
)
0.91
"003] in randomized controlled trials, but adverse events (AEs) were higher than those in the control group (P < 0."( A meta-analysis of the efficacy and toxicity of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in treating patients with different types of thyroid cancer: how to choose drugs appropriately?
Lin, S; Lu, J; Su, J; Wang, M; Yan, J; Zhang, J, 2023
)
0.91
" Despite some reports from overseas, the relationship between Cmin, adverse events (AEs), and treatment efficacy in Japanese patients with GIST has still been lacking."( Plasma trough concentration of imatinib and its effect on therapeutic efficacy and adverse events in Japanese patients with GIST.
Doki, Y; Eguchi, H; Hayashi, Y; Hirota, S; Koh, M; Kurokawa, Y; Makino, T; Motoori, M; Nakajima, K; Nishida, T; Nishigaki, T; Omori, T; Saito, T; Takahashi, T; Takehara, T; Tanaka, K; Teranishi, R; Yamamoto, K; Yamashita, K, 2023
)
0.91
" Our data showed that nilotinib could be, as first-line treatment, effective and relatively safe even in elderly CML patients."( Efficacy and safety of nilotinib as frontline treatment in elderly (> 65 years) chronic myeloid leukemia patients outside clinical trials.
Albano, F; Annunziata, M; Bocchia, M; Breccia, M; Castagnetti, F; Dragani, M; Esposito, MR; Galimberti, S; Gugliotta, G; Iovine, M; Iurlo, A; Latagliata, R; Luciano, L; Martino, B; Palmieri, R; Pregno, P; Rosti, G; Sica, A; Sica, S; Sorà, F; Tiribelli, M, 2023
)
0.91
"We report a 51-year-old man, suffering from acute toxic hepatitis after 5 months of imatinib treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia."( Imatinib mesylate-induced acute hepatotoxicity.
Chtourou, L; Elloumi, M; Fakhfakh, Y; Frikha, I; Medhaffar, M; Sahnoun, R, 2023
)
2.35
"This study aimed to conduct a thorough analysis of fluid retention-associated adverse events (AEs) associated with BCR::ABL inhibitors."( Fluid retention-associated adverse events in patients treated with BCR::ABL1 inhibitors based on FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS): a retrospective pharmacovigilance study.
Cai, J; Huang, J; Jiang, Q; Lin, H; Wu, L; Ye, Q, 2023
)
0.91
"Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database for BCR::ABL inhibitors was searched from 1 January 2004 to 30 September 2021."( Fluid retention-associated adverse events in patients treated with BCR::ABL1 inhibitors based on FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS): a retrospective pharmacovigilance study.
Cai, J; Huang, J; Jiang, Q; Lin, H; Wu, L; Ye, Q, 2023
)
0.91
"Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) often experience cutaneous adverse events, such as rashes and pruritus."( Comparison of cutaneous adverse events between second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors and imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cha, SH; Kim, K; Song, YK, 2023
)
0.91
" Two independent reviewers screened the results and selected articles on cutaneous adverse events."( Comparison of cutaneous adverse events between second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors and imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cha, SH; Kim, K; Song, YK, 2023
)
0.91
"This study shows that neoadjuvant imatinib is effective and safe for patients with large or locally advanced GIST."( Neoadjuvant Imatinib in Locally Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) is Effective and Safe: Results from a Prospective Single-Center Study with 108 Patients.
Hartemink, KJ; Ijzerman, N; Kerst, M; Koenen, AM; Roets, E; Schrage, YM; Steeghs, N; van Coevorden, F; van de Wal, D; van der Burg, SJC; van der Graaf, WTA; van Houdt, WJ; van Sandick, JW; Veenhof, XAAFA, 2023
)
0.91

Pharmacokinetics

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"1 h); half-life (11."( [Efficacy and pharmacokinetics of imatinib mesylate in a child with chronic myeloid leukemia].
Chida, S; Endo, M; Hosokawa, T; Nakatuji, Y; Sugawara, W, 2003
)
0.6
" Two additional blood samples were taken for imatinib pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment on day 8 before, and 24 h after, imatinib administration."( Effects of imatinib mesylate (STI571, Glivec) on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin, a cytochrome p450 3A4 substrate, in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia.
Beck, J; Bond, E; Capdeville, R; Dutreix, C; Fischer, T; Huber, C; Mehring, G; Meinhardt, P; Milosavljev, S; O'Brien, SG; Peng, B, 2003
)
0.71
"Despite the remarkable clinical response rates to imatinib in the treatment of bcr-abl leukemic patients, pharmacokinetic data on this relatively novel substance are needed to improve our understanding of the emergence of resistance, the interindividual variations of clinical response and the clinical and biologic relevance of its main metabolite N-desmethyl-imatinib."( Pharmacokinetics and cellular uptake of imatinib and its main metabolite CGP74588.
Baskaynak, G; Bonin, Mv; Bornhäuser, M; Dörken, B; Ehninger, G; Jenke, A; Kreuzer, KA; le Coutre, P; Leopold, T; Ottmann, O; Pursche, S; Schleyer, E, 2004
)
0.32
"To evaluate the basic pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of imatinib mesylate and assess the relationship between the PK and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of the drug."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of imatinib in a phase I trial with chronic myeloid leukemia patients.
Capdeville, R; Druker, BJ; Ford, J; Hayes, M; Lloyd, P; Peng, B; Racine-Poon, A; Resta, D; Rosamilia, M; Sawyers, CL; Talpaz, M, 2004
)
0.56
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using model-independent methods."( Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics of imatinib after administration to nonhuman primates.
Aleksic, A; Balis, FM; Berg, SL; Blaney, SM; Egorin, MJ; McCully, C; McGuffey, L; Neville, K; Parise, RA; Thompson, P, 2004
)
0.32
" Imatinib and CGP74588 (main metabolite of imatinib) concentrations were measured using LC/MS/MS method and pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by a non-compartmental analysis."( Pharmacokinetic interaction between ketoconazole and imatinib mesylate (Glivec) in healthy subjects.
Capdeville, R; Dutreix, C; Hayes, M; Mehring, G; Peng, B; Pokorny, R; Seiberling, M, 2004
)
0.57
" Imatinib half-life (12."( Effect of St John's wort on imatinib mesylate pharmacokinetics.
Egorin, MJ; Fitzgerald, SM; Frye, RF; Hruska, MW; Lagattuta, TF, 2004
)
0.62
"Open-label, complete crossover, fixed-sequence, pharmacokinetic study."( The influence of St. John's wort on the pharmacokinetics and protein binding of imatinib mesylate.
Berenson, CS; Booker, BM; Bullock, JM; Haas, CE; Jusko, WJ; Smith, P, 2004
)
0.55
"005), and 21% in half-life (p=0."( The influence of St. John's wort on the pharmacokinetics and protein binding of imatinib mesylate.
Berenson, CS; Booker, BM; Bullock, JM; Haas, CE; Jusko, WJ; Smith, P, 2004
)
0.55
" However, we have now evidence, based on several in vitro and in vivo observations suggesting that pharmacokinetic resistance may also play a definitive role in the ultimate resistance of patients on chronic imatinib."( Pharmacokinetic resistance to imatinib mesylate: role of the ABC drug pumps ABCG2 (BCRP) and ABCB1 (MDR1) in the oral bioavailability of imatinib.
Burger, H; Nooter, K, 2004
)
0.61
"The pharmacokinetic values for imatinib and CGP74588, respectively, were: maximum concentration (3,340 and 781 ng/ml), time to maximum concentration (2 h), half-life (18."( Pharmacokinetics of imatinib mesylate in end stage renal disease. A case study.
Briasoulis, E; Karavasilis, V; Marselos, M; Pappas, P; Pavlidis, N, 2005
)
0.65
" Nonlinear mixed effects modelling was used for the population pharmacokinetic analysis."( Population pharmacokinetics of imatinib mesylate in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukaemia: results of a phase III study.
Bolton, AE; Capdeville, R; Gathmann, I; Hensley, M; Peng, B; Racine-Poon, A; Riviere, GJ; Schmidli, H, 2005
)
0.61
" Pharmacokinetic studies of imatinib in healthy volunteers and patients with CML, GIST and other cancers show that orally administered imatinib is well absorbed, and has an absolute bioavailability of 98% irrespective of oral dosage form (solution, capsule, tablet) or dosage strength (100 mg, 400 mg)."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of imatinib.
Lloyd, P; Peng, B; Schran, H, 2005
)
0.33
"A population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using NONMEM based on 321 plasma samples from 59 patients with either chronic myeloid leukaemia or gastrointestinal stromal tumours."( Population pharmacokinetics of imatinib and the role of alpha-acid glycoprotein.
Biollaz, J; Buclin, T; Csajka, C; Decosterd, LA; Duchosal, MA; Eap, CB; Henry, H; Leyvraz, S; Rochat, B; Rosselet, A; Widmer, N, 2006
)
0.33
"Because of the high pharmacokinetic variability of imatinib and the reported relationships between its plasma concentration and efficacy and toxicity, the usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring as an aid to optimizing therapy should be further investigated."( Population pharmacokinetics of imatinib and the role of alpha-acid glycoprotein.
Biollaz, J; Buclin, T; Csajka, C; Decosterd, LA; Duchosal, MA; Eap, CB; Henry, H; Leyvraz, S; Rochat, B; Rosselet, A; Widmer, N, 2006
)
0.33
" However, pharmacokinetic parameters of imatinib in vivo were not statistically significantly different in 16 patients who were heterozygous for ABCG2 421C>A compared with 66 patients carrying the wild-type sequence (P = ."( Association of enzyme and transporter genotypes with the pharmacokinetics of imatinib.
Baker, SD; Bates, SE; Burger, H; de Bruijn, EA; de Jong, FA; Figg, WD; Gardner, ER; Guetens, G; Nooter, K; Prenen, H; Sparreboom, A; van Oosterom, AT; van Schaik, RH; Verweij, J, 2006
)
0.33
"This study explored factors affecting the pharmacokinetic variability of imatinib and CGP 74588, and the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic correlations in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors."( Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of imatinib and its main metabolite in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Berthaud, P; Blay, JY; Chatelut, E; Delbaldo, C; Deroussent, A; Jambu, A; Le Cesne, A; Ré, M; Séronie-Vivien, S; Vassal, G, 2006
)
0.33
" Plasma imatinib and CGP 74588 concentrations were quantified by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry, and analyzed by the population pharmacokinetic method (NONMEM program)."( Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of imatinib and its main metabolite in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Berthaud, P; Blay, JY; Chatelut, E; Delbaldo, C; Deroussent, A; Jambu, A; Le Cesne, A; Ré, M; Séronie-Vivien, S; Vassal, G, 2006
)
0.33
" Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis showed that imatinib displayed linear PK in patients with advanced GIST."( [Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamics relationships of imatinib (Glivec)].
Delbaldo, C,
)
0.13
" In this phase-I/II trial pharmacokinetic parameters of imatinib given for hepatocellular cancer were similar to those previously derived from CML patients."( Imatinib for hepatocellular cancer--focus on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling and liver function.
Hosius, C; Malfertheiner, P; Schleyer, E; Treiber, G; Troeger, U; Wex, T, 2008
)
0.35
" Pharmacokinetic analyses revealed lowered exposures and enhanced clearance among patients on EIAEDs."( Safety and pharmacokinetics of dose-intensive imatinib mesylate plus temozolomide: phase 1 trial in adults with malignant glioma.
Desjardins, A; Egorin, MJ; Friedman, AH; Friedman, HS; Gururangan, S; Herndon, JE; Lagattuta, TF; McLendon, R; Quinn, JA; Reardon, DA; Rich, JN; Salvado, AJ; Sathornsumetee, S; Vredenburgh, JJ, 2008
)
0.6
" Population pharmacokinetic (PPK) studies evaluating the effect of population covariates on the pharmacokinetics of imatinib and its active metabolite have been developed in adults with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST)."( Population pharmacokinetics of imatinib mesylate and its metabolite in children and young adults.
Barrett, JS; Bernstein, M; Blaney, SM; Bond, M; Champagne, M; Fossler, MJ; Jayaraman, B; Menon-Andersen, D; Mondick, JT; Thompson, PA, 2009
)
0.64
" Of the over 325 members of the solute carrier superfamily, this review focuses on the molecular features, expressional regulation, and genetic polymorphisms of the organic cation transporter (OCT) family, and the pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic consequences for organic cationic drugs."( Organic cation transporters and their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic consequences.
Choi, MK; Song, IS, 2008
)
0.35
" Plasma imatinib and CGP74588 concentrations observed on day 1 and at steady-state were analyzed by a population pharmacokinetic method (NONMEM) to evaluate the effect of age, body weight, age, sex, albuminemia, plasma alpha1-acid glycoprotein (AGP), and eight polymorphisms corresponding to ABCB1, ABCG2, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and AGP (pharmacogenetic data available for 46 of 67 patients)."( Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of imatinib in children and adults.
Azard, J; Barrois, M; Chatelut, E; Delbaldo, C; Geoerger, B; Kattygnarath, D; LeCesne, A; Petain, A; Séronie-Vivien, S; Vassal, G, 2008
)
0.35
"This study assessed the pharmacokinet-ics of single and multiple oral doses of nilotinib in Chinese patients with CML and compared the pharmacokinetic profiles of nilotinib between the Chinese patients and a subgroup of white patients with CML."( Nilotinib for imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase, accelerated phase, or blast crisis: a single- and multiple-dose, open-label pharmacokinetic study in Chinese patients.
Hu, P; Meng, F; Shen, Z; Wang, J; Wang, Y; Wei, Y; Yin, O; Zhou, L, 2009
)
0.35
" Serum nilotinib concentrations were determined using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay, and pharmacokinetic parameters of nilotinib were calculated using a noncompartmental method."( Nilotinib for imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase, accelerated phase, or blast crisis: a single- and multiple-dose, open-label pharmacokinetic study in Chinese patients.
Hu, P; Meng, F; Shen, Z; Wang, J; Wang, Y; Wei, Y; Yin, O; Zhou, L, 2009
)
0.35
" Two patients withdrew consent and discontinued after administration of the first dose; thus, 21 patients were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis."( Nilotinib for imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase, accelerated phase, or blast crisis: a single- and multiple-dose, open-label pharmacokinetic study in Chinese patients.
Hu, P; Meng, F; Shen, Z; Wang, J; Wang, Y; Wei, Y; Yin, O; Zhou, L, 2009
)
0.35
"In this pharmacokinetic study in Chinese patients with CML resistant to or intolerant of imatinib, nilotinib 400 mg BID was rapidly absorbed after a single dose and multiple doses."( Nilotinib for imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase, accelerated phase, or blast crisis: a single- and multiple-dose, open-label pharmacokinetic study in Chinese patients.
Hu, P; Meng, F; Shen, Z; Wang, J; Wang, Y; Wei, Y; Yin, O; Zhou, L, 2009
)
0.35
" The agent, administered orally, has approximately 98% oral bioavailability, achieves maximum plasma concentration approximately 2-4 hours after ingestion, and has a plasma half-life of approximately 18 hours."( Imatinib mesylate pharmacokinetics before and after sleeve gastrectomy in a morbidly obese patient with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Beumer, JH; Egorin, MJ; Pavlovsky, C; Pavlovsky, S; Rogel, S; Shah, DD, 2009
)
1.8
" Post marketing study commitments have been made upon (accelerated) approval such as additional pharmacokinetic studies in patients with renal- or hepatic impairment, in children, additional interactions studies and studies on the relative or absolute bioavailability."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Gelderblom, H; Guchelaar, HJ; van Erp, NP, 2009
)
0.35
"97), or half-life (13."( Effect of a proton pump inhibitor on the pharmacokinetics of imatinib.
Appleman, LR; Beumer, JH; Christner, SM; Egorin, MJ; Komazec, KA; Miller, BM; Redner, RL; Shah, DD; Yerk, MA, 2009
)
0.35
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using WinNonLin software."( Interleukin-2 treatment effect on imatinib pharmacokinetic, P-gp and BCRP expression in mice.
Abbara, C; Bonhomme-Faivre, L; Cibert, M; Farinotti, R; Gonin, P; Hosten, B; Petit, B, 2010
)
0.36
" The method is found to be rapid, reliable, and suitable for in vivo pharmacokinetic study."( Validation of an HPLC method for determination of imatinib mesylate in rat serum and its application in a pharmacokinetic study.
Bende, G; Kollipara, S; Moorthy, G; Movva, S; Saha, R,
)
0.38
" Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated."( Differential effects of ketoconazole and primaquine on the pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of imatinib in mice.
Bukhari, NI; Chay, G; Kan, E; Law, JH; Lim, WY; Segarra, I; Soo, GW; Tan, SY, 2010
)
0.36
" Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic factors, adherence, and drug-drug interactions can affect exposure to imatinib and impact clinical outcomes."( Correlations between imatinib pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, adherence, and clinical response in advanced metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): an emerging role for drug blood level testing?
von Mehren, M; Widmer, N, 2011
)
0.37
" The pharmacokinetics of paracetamol and imatinib in Korean patients with CML were similar to previous pharmacokinetic results in white patients with CML."( Effects of imatinib mesylate on the pharmacokinetics of paracetamol (acetaminophen) in Korean patients with chronic myelogenous leukaemia.
Demirhan, E; Hayes, M; Jin, Y; Kim, DW; Park, S; Schran, H; Tan, EY; Wang, Y, 2011
)
0.76
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by a population pharmacokinetic analysis based on 622 plasma samples from 34 patients at steady state."( Association of genetic polymorphisms in the influx transporter SLCO1B3 and the efflux transporter ABCB1 with imatinib pharmacokinetics in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Hamada, A; Hirayama, C; Kawaguchi, T; Nakashima, R; Saito, H; Yamakawa, Y; Yuki, M, 2011
)
0.37
"The pharmacokinetic interaction between metronidazole, an antibiotic-antiparasitic drug used to treat anaerobic bacterial and protozoal infections, and imatinib, a CYP3A4, P-glycoprotein substrate kinase inhibitor anticancer drug, was evaluated."( Metronidazole leads to enhanced uptake of imatinib in brain, liver and kidney without affecting its plasma pharmacokinetics in mice.
Bukhari, NI; Chay, G; Kan, E; Law, JH; Lim, WY; Segarra, I; Soo, GW; Tan, SY, 2011
)
0.37
" Imatinib plasma, brain, kidney and liver concentrations were measured by HPLC and non-compartmental pharmacokinetic parameters estimated."( Metronidazole leads to enhanced uptake of imatinib in brain, liver and kidney without affecting its plasma pharmacokinetics in mice.
Bukhari, NI; Chay, G; Kan, E; Law, JH; Lim, WY; Segarra, I; Soo, GW; Tan, SY, 2011
)
0.37
" Considering that a retrospective pharmacokinetic analysis has also suggested that imatinib clearance increases over time in patients with soft tissue sarcoma and GIST, the primary aim of this study was to assess systemic exposure to imatinib at multiple time points in a long-term prospective population pharmacokinetic study."( A long-term prospective population pharmacokinetic study on imatinib plasma concentrations in GIST patients.
De Giorgi, U; de Jong, FA; Eechoute, K; Fransson, MN; Friberg, LE; Loos, WJ; Mathijssen, RH; Reyners, AK; Schiavon, G; Sparreboom, A; van der Graaf, WT; Verweij, J; Wiemer, EA, 2012
)
0.38
"Full pharmacokinetic blood sampling was conducted in 50 patients with GIST on the first day of imatinib treatment, and after one, six, and 12 months."( A long-term prospective population pharmacokinetic study on imatinib plasma concentrations in GIST patients.
De Giorgi, U; de Jong, FA; Eechoute, K; Fransson, MN; Friberg, LE; Loos, WJ; Mathijssen, RH; Reyners, AK; Schiavon, G; Sparreboom, A; van der Graaf, WT; Verweij, J; Wiemer, EA, 2012
)
0.38
"This is the first prospective pharmacokinetic study in patients with GIST, showing a significant decrease of approximately 30% in imatinib exposure after long-term treatment."( A long-term prospective population pharmacokinetic study on imatinib plasma concentrations in GIST patients.
De Giorgi, U; de Jong, FA; Eechoute, K; Fransson, MN; Friberg, LE; Loos, WJ; Mathijssen, RH; Reyners, AK; Schiavon, G; Sparreboom, A; van der Graaf, WT; Verweij, J; Wiemer, EA, 2012
)
0.38
"Concentration data from 493 patients with CML in chronic phase (CML-CP), accelerated phase, or blast crisis were used to perform a population pharmacokinetic analysis using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling."( Nilotinib population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response analysis in patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia.
Baccarani, M; Giles, FJ; Kantarjian, HM; le Coutre, PD; Ottmann, OG; Sallas, WM; Woodman, RC; Yin, OQ, 2013
)
0.39
" Patients with a lower Cmin had significantly longer time to complete cytogenetic response (P = 0."( Nilotinib population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response analysis in patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia.
Baccarani, M; Giles, FJ; Kantarjian, HM; le Coutre, PD; Ottmann, OG; Sallas, WM; Woodman, RC; Yin, OQ, 2013
)
0.39
"When tolerability allows, adherence to the nilotinib dose (400 mg twice daily) in order to maintain sufficient Cmin is important in maximizing the efficacy of nilotinib in patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant CML."( Nilotinib population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response analysis in patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia.
Baccarani, M; Giles, FJ; Kantarjian, HM; le Coutre, PD; Ottmann, OG; Sallas, WM; Woodman, RC; Yin, OQ, 2013
)
0.39
"Several population pharmacokinetic (PPK) analyses of the anticancer drug imatinib have been performed to investigate different patient populations and covariate effects."( Systematic review of population pharmacokinetic analyses of imatinib and relationships with treatment outcomes.
Buclin, T; Csajka, C; Gotta, V; Widmer, N, 2013
)
0.39
" The relationships between imatinib exposure and therapeutic efficacy or toxicity were examined by grouping patients into quartiles according to Cmin and its percent change after dose escalation."( Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of imatinib dose escalation to 800 mg/day in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Beck, MY; Kang, YK; Ryoo, BY; Ryu, MH; Yoo, C, 2013
)
0.39
"Given that the validated method has proved to be linear, accurate, precise, and robust, it is suitable for pharmacokinetic assays, such as bioavailability and bioequivalence, and is being successfully applied in routine therapeutic drug monitoring in the hospital service."( Quantification of imatinib in human serum: validation of a high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method for therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacokinetic assays.
Bendit, I; de Alencar Fisher Chamone, D; Novaes, MM; Rezende, VM; Rivellis, A, 2013
)
0.39
" When co-administered with voriconazole, pharmacokinetic parameters of imatinib were not significantly altered except for a 36."( Differential effects of ketoconazole, itraconazole and voriconazole on the pharmacokinetics of imatinib and its main metabolite GCP74588 in rat.
Han, A; Hu, G; Kan, X; Lin, G; Qiu, X; Wang, C; Wang, Z; Xu, T, 2014
)
0.4
" In this paper, the pharmacokinetic characteristics (absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion) and drug-drug interactions of the approved TKIs are reviewed."( [Clinical pharmacokinetics of small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors].
Ding, JF; Zhong, DF, 2013
)
0.39
" A population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed to investigate imatinib disposition in every patient and the role of transporter polymorphisms."( The c.480C>G polymorphism of hOCT1 influences imatinib clearance in patients affected by chronic myeloid leukemia.
Angelini, S; Arici, R; Baratè, C; Bocci, G; Capecchi, M; Cervetti, G; Ciabatti, E; Danesi, R; Di Paolo, A; Fontanelli, G; Galimberti, S; Grassi, S; Guerrini, F; Hrelia, P; Petrini, M; Polillo, M, 2014
)
0.4
" We describe a kinetic and pharmacodynamic (PD) model of Bcr-Abl signalling in myeloid cells that is used to simulate effects of four classes of drugs: Bcr-Abl signalling inhibitors, such as imatinib, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, and pro- and anti-oxidants."( A pharmacodynamic model of Bcr-Abl signalling in chronic myeloid leukaemia.
Jackson, RC; Radivoyevitch, T, 2014
)
0.4
"This study examined whether oral administration of dasatinib to the rats with imatinib led to any pharmacokinetic interactions."( Pharmacokinetic interaction study of combining imatinib with dasatinib in rats by UPLC-MS/MS.
Ding, T; Geng, P; Ma, J; Wang, S; Wu, M; Zhang, Q; Zhou, Y, 2015
)
0.42
"To prepare, optimize and characterize imatinib-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (IMT-NLC), and evaluate their pharmacokinetic and cytotoxicity characteristics."( Modulation of Pharmacokinetic and Cytotoxicity Profile of Imatinib Base by Employing Optimized Nanostructured Lipid Carriers.
Cho, HJ; Choi, HG; Gupta, B; Jeong, JH; Kim, JO; Poudel, BK; Pradhan, R; Shin, BS; Tran, TH; Yong, CS, 2015
)
0.42
" An in vivo pharmacokinetic study was conducted in rats after both oral and intravenous administration."( Modulation of Pharmacokinetic and Cytotoxicity Profile of Imatinib Base by Employing Optimized Nanostructured Lipid Carriers.
Cho, HJ; Choi, HG; Gupta, B; Jeong, JH; Kim, JO; Poudel, BK; Pradhan, R; Shin, BS; Tran, TH; Yong, CS, 2015
)
0.42
"A combined DoE approach enabled accurate optimization and successful preparation of IMT-NLC with enhanced in vivo pharmacokinetic and in vitro cytotoxicity characteristics."( Modulation of Pharmacokinetic and Cytotoxicity Profile of Imatinib Base by Employing Optimized Nanostructured Lipid Carriers.
Cho, HJ; Choi, HG; Gupta, B; Jeong, JH; Kim, JO; Poudel, BK; Pradhan, R; Shin, BS; Tran, TH; Yong, CS, 2015
)
0.42
" The aim of this study was to investigate the absorption and distribution kinetics of imatinib in healthy Iranian volunteers using nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NLMEM) to assess the overall, intra- and inter-subject variabilities in pharmacokinetic parameters after oral administration."( Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of the Oral Absorption Process and Explaining Intra-Subject Variability in Plasma Exposures of Imatinib in Healthy Volunteers.
Dinan, NM; Golabchifar, AA; Kebriaeezadeh, A; Rezaee, S; Rouini, MR, 2016
)
0.43
" To simultaneously describe the imatinib pharmacokinetic profiles obtained with both formulations, a population pharmacokinetic model was applied to data using SAEM algorithm implemented in MONOLIX, whilst simulations were used by numerical solving of ordinary differential equations to calculate secondary parameters in individuals for bioequivalence studies."( Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of the Oral Absorption Process and Explaining Intra-Subject Variability in Plasma Exposures of Imatinib in Healthy Volunteers.
Dinan, NM; Golabchifar, AA; Kebriaeezadeh, A; Rezaee, S; Rouini, MR, 2016
)
0.43
"According to goodness-of-fit criteria, a two-compartment open model with sequential zero- then first-order absorption and first-order elimination was used as the structural pharmacokinetic model."( Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of the Oral Absorption Process and Explaining Intra-Subject Variability in Plasma Exposures of Imatinib in Healthy Volunteers.
Dinan, NM; Golabchifar, AA; Kebriaeezadeh, A; Rezaee, S; Rouini, MR, 2016
)
0.43
" Future studies should focus on other pharmacokinetic processes so as to identify the major contributor to patient variability in imatinib plasma concentrations."( In Vivo Cytochrome P450 3A Isoenzyme Activity and Pharmacokinetics of Imatinib in Relation to Therapeutic Outcome in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.
Aagesen, J; Alsenhed, J; Aluthgedara, W; Bergquist, J; Gréen, H; Hägg, S; Johnsson, A; Lotfi, K; Olsson-Strömberg, U; Peterson, C; Richter, J; Sandstedt, A; Skoglund, K; Söderlund, S; Svedberg, A; Ubhayasekera, SJ; Vikingsson, S, 2016
)
0.43
" Concomitant use after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) or Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphatic leukemia (ALL) may therefore result in a pharmacokinetic interaction."( A clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interaction between cyclosporine and imatinib.
Andrews, LM; Atiq, F; Broers, AE; Doorduijn, JK; Koch, BC; Van Gelder, T; Versmissen, J, 2016
)
0.43
" We also describe key success factors that are useful for judging the quality of clinical pharmacodynamic studies, including biopsy quality and suitability, specimen handling, assay fitness-for-purpose, and reagent quality control."( Theory and practice of clinical pharmacodynamics in oncology drug development.
Doroshow, JH; Parchment, RE, 2016
)
0.43
"A population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed on 170 plasma samples from 74 adult Iranian chronic myeloid leukemia patients."( Population Pharmacokinetics of Imatinib and its application to the therapeutic drug monitoring: Middle East CML population.
Ansari, M; Kalantary-Khandani, B; Mohajeri, E; Mosavi, N; Pardakhty, A; Safavi, M, 2016
)
0.43
"By considering morphological and biological covariates, a unique covariate model could be used to accurately describe Imatinib pharmacokinetics in our population and because of the pharmacokinetic variability of Imatinib and the reported relationships between its plasma concentration and efficacy and toxicity, the usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring as an aid to optimizing therapy should be further investigated."( Population Pharmacokinetics of Imatinib and its application to the therapeutic drug monitoring: Middle East CML population.
Ansari, M; Kalantary-Khandani, B; Mohajeri, E; Mosavi, N; Pardakhty, A; Safavi, M, 2016
)
0.43
" Several studies have established interindividual and interpopulation variations in imatinib disposition although no pharmacokinetic study have been conducted in an African population since the introduction of the drug."( Population Pharmacokinetics of Imatinib in Nigerians With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Clinical Implications for Dosing and Resistance.
Adeagbo, BA; Bolaji, OO; Bolarinwa, RA; Durosinmi, MA; Ogungbenro, K; Olugbade, TA, 2017
)
0.46
" In the same way, suboptimal adherence may also bias the results of pharmacokinetic modeling studies, which will affect in turn Bayesian TDM interpretation that relies on such population models."( Effect of Adherence on Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Relationships of Oral Targeted Anticancer Drugs.
Cardoso, E; Csajka, C; Schneider, MP; Widmer, N, 2018
)
0.48
" Pharmacokinetic variables (e."( Pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of imatinib in pediatric patients.
Bornhäuser, M; Metzler, M; Millot, F; Schleyer, E; Suttorp, M, 2018
)
0.48
"Preclinical pharmacokinetic studies are an essential part of modern drug development."( Using miniature MS system with automatic blood sampler for preclinical pharmacokinetics study.
Bateman, KP; Helmy, R; Liu, Y; Ouyang, Z; Pu, F; Zhang, W, 2017
)
0.46
" The miniature MS system was used to obtain drug concentrations, which were subsequently used to calculate the pharmacokinetic parameters."( Using miniature MS system with automatic blood sampler for preclinical pharmacokinetics study.
Bateman, KP; Helmy, R; Liu, Y; Ouyang, Z; Pu, F; Zhang, W, 2017
)
0.46
"The growing interest of cancerous patients in using vitamins, while on imatinib (IMA) therapy, increased the risk of their pharmacokinetic interactions."( Ultra-performance LC-MS/MS study of the pharmacokinetic interaction of imatinib with selected vitamin preparations in rats.
Alzoman, NZ; Maher, HM; Shehata, SM, 2018
)
0.48
" Co-administered vitamin preparations could affect IMA pharmacokinetic profiling through either an increase (vitamin A and E) or a decrease (vitamin C) in IMA bioavailability."( Ultra-performance LC-MS/MS study of the pharmacokinetic interaction of imatinib with selected vitamin preparations in rats.
Alzoman, NZ; Maher, HM; Shehata, SM, 2018
)
0.48
"To enable such efficacy studies of two clinically approved TKIs, nilotinib, and imatinib, we first conducted comprehensive pharmacokinetic (PK) studies in relevant rodent and non-rodent animal models."( Preclinical pharmacokinetic evaluation to facilitate repurposing of tyrosine kinase inhibitors nilotinib and imatinib as antiviral agents.
Ananthula, HK; Buller, RM; Damon, IK; Desai, PB; Gallardo-Romero, N; Kalman, D; Moir-Savitz, T; Olson, V; Parker, S; Patel, G; Sallans, L; Salzer, JS; Sherwin, CM; Touchette, E; Werner, MH, 2018
)
0.48
" The longer nilotinib elimination half-life in prairie dogs (i."( Preclinical pharmacokinetic evaluation to facilitate repurposing of tyrosine kinase inhibitors nilotinib and imatinib as antiviral agents.
Ananthula, HK; Buller, RM; Damon, IK; Desai, PB; Gallardo-Romero, N; Kalman, D; Moir-Savitz, T; Olson, V; Parker, S; Patel, G; Sallans, L; Salzer, JS; Sherwin, CM; Touchette, E; Werner, MH, 2018
)
0.48
" The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for hyperforin (the constituent of SJW responsible for interactions), which has the potential to provide unique insights into SJW interactions and allow prediction of the likely extent of interactions with SJW compared to published interaction reports."( Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modelling of Hyperforin to Predict Drug Interactions with St John's Wort.
Adiwidjaja, J; Boddy, AV; McLachlan, AJ, 2019
)
0.51
" Currently, multiple oral TKIs have been introduced in the treatment of solid tumours, all administered in a fixed dose, although large interpatient pharmacokinetic (PK) variability is described."( Imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib: From flat-fixed dosing towards a pharmacokinetically guided personalized dose.
Desar, IME; Steeghs, N; van der Graaf, WTA; van Erp, NP; Westerdijk, K, 2020
)
0.56
" Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models for the lignans accounting for reversible and mechanism-based inhibitions and induction of CYP3A enzymes were built in the Simcyp Simulator (version 17) and evaluated for their capability to predict interactions with midazolam and tacrolimus."( Potential for pharmacokinetic interactions between Schisandra sphenanthera and bosutinib, but not imatinib: in vitro metabolism study combined with a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling approach.
Adiwidjaja, J; Boddy, AV; McLachlan, AJ, 2020
)
0.56
"This study aimed to investigate the potential pharmacokinetic interactions between curcumin, imatinib and bosutinib, combining In Vitro and in silico methods."( Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Predictions of the Effect of Curcumin on Metabolism of Imatinib and Bosutinib: In Vitro and In Vivo Disconnect.
Adiwidjaja, J; Boddy, AV; McLachlan, AJ, 2020
)
0.56
" A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for curcumin formulated as solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) was constructed using In Vitro glucuronidation kinetics and published clinical pharmacokinetic data."( Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Predictions of the Effect of Curcumin on Metabolism of Imatinib and Bosutinib: In Vitro and In Vivo Disconnect.
Adiwidjaja, J; Boddy, AV; McLachlan, AJ, 2020
)
0.56
" Being a CYP3A4 substrate, imatinib co-administration with CYP3A4 modulators would change its pharmacokinetic profile."( The effect of grape seed and green tea extracts on the pharmacokinetics of imatinib and its main metabolite, N-desmethyl imatinib, in rats.
Al Sharie, AH; Arafat, T; Babaresh, WM; Darweesh, RS; El-Elimat, T; Khamis, TN; Zayed, A, 2020
)
0.56
" Plasma samples were collected and analyzed for imatinib and N-desmethyl imatinib concentrations using LC-MS/MS method, then their non-compartmental pharmacokinetic parameters were determined."( The effect of grape seed and green tea extracts on the pharmacokinetics of imatinib and its main metabolite, N-desmethyl imatinib, in rats.
Al Sharie, AH; Arafat, T; Babaresh, WM; Darweesh, RS; El-Elimat, T; Khamis, TN; Zayed, A, 2020
)
0.56
" Pharmacokinetic studies were performed in male SD rats."( In vivo Pharmacokinetics and in vitro Release of Imatinib Mesylate-Loaded Liposomes for Pulmonary Delivery.
Ji, H; Li, Z; Qiao, W; Tang, J; Wang, C; Xu, H, 2021
)
0.88
" Following intratracheal administration to rats, IM-LPs not only extended the half-life of IM, but also prolonged retention of IM compared with plain IM solution after intratracheal and intravenous administration."( In vivo Pharmacokinetics and in vitro Release of Imatinib Mesylate-Loaded Liposomes for Pulmonary Delivery.
Ji, H; Li, Z; Qiao, W; Tang, J; Wang, C; Xu, H, 2021
)
0.88
" Several imatinib population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models have been developed."( External evaluation of population pharmacokinetic models of imatinib in adults diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukaemia.
Corral Alaejos, Á; Jiménez Cabrera, S; Otero, MJ; Pérez-Blanco, JS; Sánchez-Guijo, F; Zarzuelo Castañeda, A, 2022
)
0.72
"This study implements a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling approach to predict the effect of hydrastine and berberine, two major alkaloids present in goldenseal extract, on pharmacokinetics of imatinib and bosutinib."( Physiologically based pharmacokinetic model predictions of natural product-drug interactions between goldenseal, berberine, imatinib and bosutinib.
Adiwidjaja, J; Boddy, AV; McLachlan, AJ, 2022
)
0.72
"PBPK models of hydrastine and berberine were developed in the Simcyp Simulator (version 17), integrating prior in vitro knowledge and published clinical pharmacokinetic data."( Physiologically based pharmacokinetic model predictions of natural product-drug interactions between goldenseal, berberine, imatinib and bosutinib.
Adiwidjaja, J; Boddy, AV; McLachlan, AJ, 2022
)
0.72
" Steady-state pharmacokinetic sampling was performed either in a sparse (4 samples each, n = 44) or intensive manner (9 samples each, n = 5)."( Role of ADME gene polymorphisms on imatinib disposition: results from a population pharmacokinetic study in chronic myeloid leukaemia.
Gokarn, A; Gota, V; Govalkar, R; Jadhav, S; Khattry, N; Krishnamurthy, MN; Kumar, S; Mehta, P; Patil, A; Punatar, S; Puri, AS; Shriyan, B, 2022
)
0.72
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated with WinNonlin software."( Pharmacokinetics, Bioequivalence, and Safety Studies of a Generic Selective Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Nilotinib Capsule Versus a Branded Product in Healthy Chinese Volunteers.
Huang, M; Lu, D; Wang, H; Wang, M; Zhang, Q; Zhou, W; Zhu, Y, 2022
)
0.72
"Virtual TDM highlights the benefit of pharmacokinetic modelling to optimising treatments in challenging oncology population groups."( The Application of Virtual Therapeutic Drug Monitoring to Assess the Pharmacokinetics of Imatinib in a Chinese Cancer Population Group.
Badhan, RKS; Yu, H, 2023
)
0.91
"We aimed to use physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling and simulation to predict imatinib steady-state plasma exposure in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) to investigate variability in outcomes."( Application of physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling to understand real-world outcomes in patients receiving imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia.
Adattini, JA; Adiwidjaja, J; Gross, AS; McLachlan, AJ, 2023
)
0.91
"In hepatic dysfunction, renal pharmacokinetic adaptation can be observed, although information on the changes in drug exposure and the interorgan regulation of membrane transporters in kidney in liver diseases is limited."( Renal Pharmacokinetic Adaptation to Cholestasis Causes Increased Nephrotoxic Drug Accumulation by Mrp6 Downregulation in Mice.
Arakawa, H; Horike, SI; Kato, Y; Kawanishi, T; Meguro-Horike, M; Nishiuchi, T; Shengyu, D; Sugimoto, M, 2023
)
0.91

Compound-Compound Interactions

Imatinib mesylate, a recently introduced specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor of BCR-ABL, in combination with chemotherapy, resulted in more than 90% hematologic CR in adult Ph-positive ALL.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The cytotoxic effects of STI571 were studied in combination with antileukemic agents against Ph(+) leukemia cell lines, KU812, K-562, TCC-S, and TCC-Y."( In vitro cytotoxic effects of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor STI571 in combination with commonly used antileukemic agents.
Akutsu, M; Furukawa, Y; Honma, Y; Kano, Y; Mano, H; Sato, Y; Tsunoda, S, 2001
)
0.31
" These represent regimens where imatinib is combined with conventional chemotherapeutic drugs or with inhibitors of other key signal transduction molecules that may be preferentially activated in CML cells."( Imatinib mesylate in combination with other chemotherapeutic drugs: in vitro studies.
Melo, JV; Tipping, AJ, 2003
)
1.76
" Thus several groups decided to investigate this new combination with the hypothesis that cell resistance would be less frequent."( Imatinib in combination with cytarabine for the treatment of Philadelphia-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia chronic-phase patients: rationale and design of phase I/II trials.
Berthaud, P; Berthou, C; Buzyn, A; Facon, T; Gardembas, M; Guilhot, F; Guilhot, J; Legros, L; Mahon, FX; Maloisel, F; Michallet, M; Najman, A; Rigal-Huguet, F; Rousselot, P; Tulliez, M; Vigier, M, 2003
)
0.32
" In this paper, we analyzed effectiveness of Glivec in combination with homoharringtonine (HHT) and cytarabine (Ara-C) for patients with Ph chromosome positive acute leukemia (Ph(+)-AL), and investigated patients' tolerance to side effects of this trial."( [Glivec in combination with HA regimen for treatment of 20 patients with Ph chromosome positive acute leukemia].
Huang, F; Liu, XL; Meng, FY; Song, LL; Xu, B; Zhang, Y; Zheng, WY, 2003
)
0.32
"Regimen of Glivec in combination with HA could increase chemotherapy effect for the patients with Ph(+)-AL, prolong their life time and the side-effects were tolerable."( [Glivec in combination with HA regimen for treatment of 20 patients with Ph chromosome positive acute leukemia].
Huang, F; Liu, XL; Meng, FY; Song, LL; Xu, B; Zhang, Y; Zheng, WY, 2003
)
0.32
" Imatinib combined with low-dose IFN-alpha may achieve prolonged hematologic and molecular remissions in a subset of patients with advanced Ph+ALL, who are not candidates for allogeneic SCT."( Efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate (Glivec) in combination with interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL).
Binckebanck, A; Gschaidmeier, H; Hoelzer, D; Käbisch, A; Leimer, L; Lübbert, M; Ottmann, OG; Pfeifer, H; Scheuring, U; Wassmann, B, 2003
)
0.63
" Thus, the efficacy of other antileukemic agents combined with ZOL should be evaluated experimentally."( Antiproliferative efficacy of the third-generation bisphosphonate, zoledronic acid, combined with other anticancer drugs in leukemic cell lines.
Kimura, S; Kuroda, J; Maekawa, T; Nogawa, M; Ottmann, OG; Sato, K; Segawa, H; Yuasa, T, 2004
)
0.32
"The effects of monoterpene perilly alcohol (POH) alone or in combination with STI571 on the proliferation and apoptosis of the cell line K562 positive for Bcr/Abl were investigated."( Effects of POH in combination with STI571 on the proliferation and apoptosis of K562 cells.
Chen, Y; Hu, D, 2004
)
0.32
" We therefore investigated the therapeutic efficacy of STI571, alone or combined with chemotherapy, in human SCLC cells or tumors xenografted into nude mice."( In vivo efficacy of STI571 in xenografted human small cell lung cancer alone or combined with chemotherapy.
de Cremoux, P; Decaudin, D; Fréneaux, P; Judde, JG; Livartowski, A; Nemati, F; Pouillart, P; Poupon, MF; Sastre, X; Tran-Perennou, C, 2005
)
0.33
"To study the synergistic effect of STI571, an inhibitor of tyrosine kinase in combination with arsenic trioxide (As(2)O(3)) on a multidrug-resistant leukemia cell line expressing bcr-abl."( [Synergistic inhibitory effect of STI571 in combination with arsenic trioxide on a multidrug-resistant leukemia cell line expressing bcr-abl].
Chen, L; Fei, XH; Gao, L; Huang, ZX; Lou, JW; Wang, JM; Xu, XP, 2004
)
0.32
"The cytotoxic effect of STI571 alone or in combination with different concentrations of As(2)O(3) on both bcr-abl and mdr1 positive leukemia cell line K562-n/VCR was detected by MTT method."( [Synergistic inhibitory effect of STI571 in combination with arsenic trioxide on a multidrug-resistant leukemia cell line expressing bcr-abl].
Chen, L; Fei, XH; Gao, L; Huang, ZX; Lou, JW; Wang, JM; Xu, XP, 2004
)
0.32
" We examined the cytotoxic effects of imatinib in combination with other anticancer agents in the human prostate cancer cell lines LNCaP, PC-3, and DU 145."( In vitro cytotoxic effects of imatinib in combination with anticancer drugs in human prostate cancer cell lines.
Battistel, C; Hartung, R; Kübler, HR; Lehmer, A; Paul, R; Treiber, U; van Randenborgh, H; Wagenpfeil, S; Wutzler, S, 2005
)
0.33
" In combination with etoposide imatinib produced additive effects in two of three cell lines."( In vitro cytotoxic effects of imatinib in combination with anticancer drugs in human prostate cancer cell lines.
Battistel, C; Hartung, R; Kübler, HR; Lehmer, A; Paul, R; Treiber, U; van Randenborgh, H; Wagenpfeil, S; Wutzler, S, 2005
)
0.33
" Imatinib was evaluated both alone and in combination with established chemotherapeutic agents in adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) primary cultures and established cell lines representing squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC)."( Synergistic effects of imatinib (STI 571) in combination with chemotherapeutic drugs in head and neck cancer.
Bruce, IA; Homer, JJ; McGown, AT; Slevin, NJ; Ward, TH, 2005
)
0.33
"To study the effect of nonmyeloablative allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (NST) transplantation combined with imatinib in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)."( [Nonmyleoablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation combined with imatinib in treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia: a clinical study].
Chen, RA; Hao, MW; He, H; Jiang, SS; Liang, YM; Liu, L; Liu, Q; Wang, LH; Zhang, JL, 2005
)
0.33
" The preparative regimen included cytoxin (CTX), Ara-C, and fludarabine combined with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody."( [Nonmyleoablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation combined with imatinib in treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia: a clinical study].
Chen, RA; Hao, MW; He, H; Jiang, SS; Liang, YM; Liu, L; Liu, Q; Wang, LH; Zhang, JL, 2005
)
0.33
"An effective and safer method for CML, especially advanced CML treatment of NST transplantation combined with imatinib before and after transplantation reduces the leukemic cell load before transplantation, inhibits the proliferation of residual leukemic cells, promotes full chimerism change and enhanced the effect of graft versus leukemia."( [Nonmyleoablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation combined with imatinib in treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia: a clinical study].
Chen, RA; Hao, MW; He, H; Jiang, SS; Liang, YM; Liu, L; Liu, Q; Wang, LH; Zhang, JL, 2005
)
0.33
" injection of gemcitabine did not inhibit tumor growth, its combination with AEE788 and STI571 produced >80% inhibition of tumor growth and prolonged survival in parallel with increases in number of tumor cells and tumor-associated endothelial cell apoptosis, decreased microvascular density, decreased proliferation rate, and prolonged survival."( Simultaneous inhibition of EGFR, VEGFR, and platelet-derived growth factor receptor signaling combined with gemcitabine produces therapy of human pancreatic carcinoma and prolongs survival in an orthotopic nude mouse model.
Abbruzzese, JL; Baker, CH; Bucana, CD; Fan, D; Fidler, IJ; Kitadai, Y; Kuwai, T; Sasaki, T; Yokoi, K, 2005
)
0.33
"The maximum tolerated dose for this combination with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor support was identified as imatinib at a dose of 300 mg/day with irinotecan (at a dose of 65 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (at a dose of 30 mg/m(2)) given on Days 1 and 8, every 21 days."( Phase I studies of imatinib mesylate combined with cisplatin and irinotecan in patients with small cell lung carcinoma.
Glisson, BS; Johnson, FM; Krug, LM; Patel, J; Peeples, B; Prieto, VG; Shoaf, S; Tamboli, P; Tran, HT, 2006
)
0.66
"Imatinib combined with high-dose chemotherapy is now becoming the gold standard for treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute leukemias."( High-dose imatinib mesylate combined with vincristine and dexamethasone (DIV regimen) as induction therapy in patients with resistant Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoid blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia.
Choufi, B; Dombret, H; Dupriez, B; Huguet, F; Legros, L; Maury, S; Ojeda-Uribe, M; Pigneux, A; Raffoux, E; Rea, D; Recher, C; Reman, O; Rousselot, P; Royer, B; Stéphane, D; Thomas, X; Turlure, P; Vigier, M, 2006
)
0.74
" Treatment of NB with STI-571 in combination with 9-cis RA might be a therapeutic strategy for patients in consolidation therapy who have completed gamma-irradiation therapy."( Effect of STI-571 (imatinib mesylate) in combination with retinoic acid and gamma-irradiation on viability of neuroblastoma cells.
Kontny, U; Lagodny, J; Niemeyer, CM; Rössler, J; Zambrzycka, I, 2006
)
0.66
" Our goals were to deliver small interfering RNA (siRNA) using a liposome-based method, and to show Bcr-Abl siRNA specificity against K-562 cells, alone or in combination with Gleevec."( Effects of siRNAs in combination with Gleevec on K-562 cell proliferation and Bcr-Abl expression.
Baker, BE; Ichiki, AT; Kestler, DP, 2006
)
0.33
"We analyzed IGF1R blockade by ADW742, a small molecule specific for this receptor, alone and in combination with imatinib, vincristine, and doxorubicin on Ewing tumor cell lines."( Insulin-like growth factor I receptor pathway inhibition by ADW742, alone or in combination with imatinib, doxorubicin, or vincristine, is a novel therapeutic approach in Ewing tumor.
Campos, M; de Alava, E; Hernández, T; Mackintosh, C; Martín, DH; Martins, AS; Ordóñez, JL, 2006
)
0.33
" Combination with usual chemotherapeutic agents vincristine and doxorubicin showed synergistic interactions."( Insulin-like growth factor I receptor pathway inhibition by ADW742, alone or in combination with imatinib, doxorubicin, or vincristine, is a novel therapeutic approach in Ewing tumor.
Campos, M; de Alava, E; Hernández, T; Mackintosh, C; Martín, DH; Martins, AS; Ordóñez, JL, 2006
)
0.33
" STI571 combined with VCR significantly suppressed the proliferation of K562-n/VCR cells."( STI571 combined with vincristine greatly suppressed the tumor formation of multidrug-resistant K562 cells in a human-nude mice xenograft model.
Chen, L; Fei, XH; Gao, L; Qiu, HY; Wang, JM; Zhou, H, 2006
)
0.33
" VCR combined with STI571 had an excellent tumor-suppressing effect on both K562-n/VCR and K562-n in the human-nude mice xenograft model."( STI571 combined with vincristine greatly suppressed the tumor formation of multidrug-resistant K562 cells in a human-nude mice xenograft model.
Chen, L; Fei, XH; Gao, L; Qiu, HY; Wang, JM; Zhou, H, 2006
)
0.33
"This study was aimed to investigate the clinical features and therapy of Ph(+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph(+)ALL) combined with invasive aspergillosis."( [Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia combined with lung and brain invasive aspergillosis].
Huang, M; Liu, WL; Ran, D; Sun, HY; Zhang, YC; Zhou, JF, 2006
)
0.33
" These in vitro studies appear to provide data for the decision of G-CSF administration in combination with imatinib in the treatment of neutropenic patients with advanced-stage CML."( Effect of imatinib mesylate combined with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on leukaemic blast cells derived from advanced-stage chronic myelogenous leukaemia patients.
Asaka, M; Hashino, S; Imamura, M; Kondo, K; Matsuno, K; Mori, A; Musashi, M; Onozawa, M; Ota, S; Tanaka, J; Toubai, T; Toyoshima, N, 2006
)
0.74
" Because of its wide spectrum of actions, it is reasonable to consider the combination with other anticancer drugs in clinical application."( Cytotoxic effects of histone deacetylase inhibitor FK228 (depsipeptide, formally named FR901228) in combination with conventional anti-leukemia/lymphoma agents against human leukemia/lymphoma cell lines.
Akutsu, M; Furukawa, Y; Izumi, T; Kano, Y; Kobayashi, H; Mano, H; Tsunoda, S, 2007
)
0.34
" During 2004 and 2005, 45 patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL were treated in the Group for Research on Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (GRAAPH) 2003 study, in which imatinib was started with HAM (mitoxantrone with intermediate-dose cytarabine) consolidation in good early responders (corticosensitive and chemosensitive ALL) or earlier during the induction course in combination with dexamethasone and vincristine in poor early responders (corticoresistant and/or chemoresistant ALL)."( Imatinib combined with induction or consolidation chemotherapy in patients with de novo Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of the GRAAPH-2003 study.
Buzyn, A; Cayuela, JM; Chalandon, Y; de Labarthe, A; Delabesse, E; Dombret, H; Escoffre, M; Huguet-Rigal, F; Ifrah, N; Lhéritier, V; MacIntyre, E; Maury, S; Pigneux, A; Réa, D; Reman, O; Rousselot, P; Thomas, X; Vekemans, MC; Vernant, JP; Witz, F, 2007
)
0.34
" Overall, our findings strongly suggest that either TZD18, either alone or in combination with imatinib may be beneficial for the treatment of CML in myeloid blast crisis."( Dual PPARalpha/gamma ligand TZD18 either alone or in combination with imatinib inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis of human CML cell lines.
Bertz, J; Elstner, E; Eucker, J; Koeffler, HP; Liu, H; Possinger, K; Waechter, M; Zang, C, 2006
)
0.33
" A Phase II study was performed on low-dose decitabine, a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor, in combination with imatinib in patients with CML in accelerated phase (AP) and myeloid blastic phase (BP)."( Phase II study of low-dose decitabine in combination with imatinib mesylate in patients with accelerated or myeloid blastic phase of chronic myelogenous leukemia.
Cortes, J; Garcia-Manero, G; Gharibyan, V; Issa, JP; Jones, D; Kantarjian, HM; Morris, GM; O'brien, S; Oki, Y; Verstovsek, S, 2007
)
0.58
" The objective of this Phase I study was to define the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of imatinib in combination with fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with chemotherapy-refractory gastrointestinal cancer."( Imatinib mesylate for targeting the platelet-derived growth factor beta receptor in combination with fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with refractory pancreatic, bile duct, colorectal, or gastric cancer--a dose-escalation Phase I trial.
Al-Batran, SE; Atmaca, A; Ehninger, G; Hosius, C; Jäger, E; Pauligk, C; Schleyer, E, 2007
)
1.78
"To observe the efficacy of Gleevec combined with myeloablative allogeneic stem cells transplantation(Allo-SCT) for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)."( [Clinical observation of Gleevec combined with myeloablative allogeneic stem cells transplantation in treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia].
Luo, Y; Pan, J; Shi, JM, 2007
)
0.34
" Mycophenolate mofetil combined with cyclosporin A and methotrexate was used for the prevention of acute GVHD."( [Clinical observation of Gleevec combined with myeloablative allogeneic stem cells transplantation in treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia].
Luo, Y; Pan, J; Shi, JM, 2007
)
0.34
"The treatment of CML consisting of myeloablative Allo-SCT combined with Gleevec before and after transplantation is an effective and safe method for CML."( [Clinical observation of Gleevec combined with myeloablative allogeneic stem cells transplantation in treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia].
Luo, Y; Pan, J; Shi, JM, 2007
)
0.34
" Here we examined the growth inhibitory effect of (-)gossypol and its combination with imatinib in K562 cells."( (-)Gossypol and its combination with imatinib induce apoptosis in human chronic myeloid leukemic cells.
Chen, X; Fu, J; Li, H; Li, J; Li, Y; Liu, H; Liu, Y; Meng, Y, 2007
)
0.34
" We treated four children with imatinib in combination with conventional chemotherapy (CT) before stem cell transplantation (SCT)."( Imatinib mesylate in combination with chemotherapy in four children with de novo and advanced stage Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Bermúdez, M; Calle, D; Fuster, JL; Galera, A; Llinares, ME; Ortuño, FJ, 2007
)
1.78
" Many new drugs including targeted therapy are combined with antineoplastic agents safely."( Bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (BEP) combination with concurrent imatinib mesylate (GLEEVEC) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patient with mesenchymal tumor.
Alanoğlu, G; Coşkun, HS; Göksu, SS; Sahin, M, 2008
)
0.58
" Proliferation assays were performed with single agent Imatinib or combined with Paclitaxel and Carboplatin."( Novel treatment of ovarian cancer cell lines with Imatinib mesylate combined with Paclitaxel and Carboplatin leads to receptor-mediated antiproliferative effects.
Bauerschlag, DO; Hilpert, F; Jonat, W; Maass, N; Meinhold-Heerlein, I; Mundhenke, C; Roesel, F; Schem, C; Sturner, KH; Weigel, MT, 2008
)
0.6
" This study was conducted to determine the activity of imatinib in combination with docetaxel in patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC)."( Imatinib mesylate in combination with docetaxel for the treatment of patients with advanced, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer and primary peritoneal carcinomatosis : a Hoosier Oncology Group trial.
Baldridge, LA; Breen, T; Emerson, RE; Johnson, CS; Matei, D; McClean, J; Menning, N; Schilder, J; Stephens, D; Sutton, G; Whalen, C, 2008
)
1.79
"To study the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of the selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor nilotinib as a single agent or in combination with imatinib in patients with advanced imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors."( A phase I study of single-agent nilotinib or in combination with imatinib in patients with imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Bailey, SM; Bertulli, R; Blay, JY; Borghaei, H; Casali, PG; Cassier, P; Cheung, W; Davey, M; Debiec-Rychter, M; Demetri, GD; Fumagalli, E; Morgan, JA; Pink, D; Ray-Coquard, I; Reichardt, A; Reichardt, P; Veronese, ML; von Mehren, M, 2009
)
0.35
"Nilotinib alone or in combination with imatinib was well tolerated overall and showed clinical activity in imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients."( A phase I study of single-agent nilotinib or in combination with imatinib in patients with imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Bailey, SM; Bertulli, R; Blay, JY; Borghaei, H; Casali, PG; Cassier, P; Cheung, W; Davey, M; Debiec-Rychter, M; Demetri, GD; Fumagalli, E; Morgan, JA; Pink, D; Ray-Coquard, I; Reichardt, A; Reichardt, P; Veronese, ML; von Mehren, M, 2009
)
0.35
"Having reported feasibility previously, we hereby report the efficacy of escalated imatinib (200 mg, 400 mg, 600 mg or 800 mg) in combination with two cycles of intravenous cytarabine (200 mg/m(2) or 1000 mg/m(2) days 1 to 7) in 162 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia."( Efficacy of escalated imatinib combined with cytarabine in newly diagnosed patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Beverloo, HB; Cornelissen, JJ; Daenen, SM; Deenik, W; Ferrant, A; Janssen, JJ; Kersten, MJ; Löwenberg, B; Ossenkoppele, GJ; Schattenberg, AV; Smit, WM; Sonneveld, P; Valk, PJ; van der Holt, B; van Marwijk Kooy, M; Verdonck, LF; Verhoef, GE; Wijermans, PW; Willemze, R; Wittebol, S, 2010
)
0.36
"The study was purposed to explore the efficacy of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) combined with Imatinib for treatment of Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph(+)ALL) patients."( [Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation combined with imatinib for treatment of Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia].
Bo, J; Cai, B; Ding, Y; Gao, CJ; Gao, L; Huang, WR; Li, HH; Sun, JF; Wang, LL; Yu, L, 2010
)
0.36
" Moreover, honikiol exhibited schedule-dependent synergy in combination with imatinib and sequential administration of imatinib followed by honokiol could be the optimal sequence to combine these two drugs in K562 cells."( Honokiol induces paraptosis and apoptosis and exhibits schedule-dependent synergy in combination with imatinib in human leukemia cells.
Wang, Y; Yang, Z; Zhao, X, 2010
)
0.36
" Imatinib mesylate, a recently introduced specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor of BCR-ABL, in combination with chemotherapy, resulted in more than 90% hematologic CR in adult Ph-positive ALL, including molecular CR in more than 50% of patients."( Treatment of Philadelphia-chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia with imatinib in combination with chemotherapy.
Ohno, R, 2006
)
1.24
" We conducted a Phase 1 study of the c-kit inhibitor, imatinib mesylate (IM), in combination with cytarabine and daunorubicin (7+3) in c-kit+ relapsed AML."( A Phase 1 study of imatinib mesylate in combination with cytarabine and daunorubicin for c-kit positive relapsed acute myeloid leukemia.
Advani, AS; Bates, J; Copelan, EA; Cotta, CV; Egorin, MJ; Howard, M; Hsi, E; Jin, T; Kalaycio, M; Lim, K; Maciejewski, J; Noon, E; Price, C; Rush, ML; Salvado, A; Saunthararajah, Y; Sekeres, MA; Sobecks, R; Tiu, R; Tripp, B, 2010
)
0.94
" We aimed to clarify the safety and effects of WT1 peptide vaccination in combination with imatinib therapy for a CML patient."( WT1 peptide vaccination in combination with imatinib therapy for a patient with CML in the chronic phase.
Aizawa, Y; Furukawa, T; Fuse, I; Kawakami, M; Kitajima, T; Kurasaki, T; Masuko, M; Narita, M; Oka, Y; Saitoh, A; Sugiyama, H; Takahashi, M; Takenouchi, S; Toba, K; Watanabe, N, 2010
)
0.36
" Treatment with HDACis combined with IM effectively induced apoptosis in quiescent CML progenitors resistant to elimination by IM alone, and eliminated CML stem cells capable of engrafting immunodeficient mice."( Effective targeting of quiescent chronic myelogenous leukemia stem cells by histone deacetylase inhibitors in combination with imatinib mesylate.
Bhatia, R; Chu, S; Ho, Y; Holyoake, T; Huettner, CS; Li, M; Shiang, KD; Shultz, L; Snyder, DS; Strauss, AC; Zhang, B, 2010
)
0.57
"In phase I, patients received imatinib (600/800 mg/day) combined with weekly (20 mg) or daily (2."( A phase I-II study of everolimus (RAD001) in combination with imatinib in patients with imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Blay, JY; Demetri, GD; Dumez, H; Hollaender, N; Jappe, A; Morgan, JA; Ray-Coquard, I; Reichardt, P; Schöffski, P, 2010
)
0.36
" The STI571 combined with As₂O₃ can enhance these two effects, increase the expression of caspase-3 mRNA and decrease the expression of bcl-xL mRNA."( [Effects of STI571 combined with As₂O₃ on proliferation, apoptosis and caspase 3, Bcl-xL expression of K562 cells].
Chen, NY; Wang, J; Wang, XM; Wang, YM; Yan, B; Yan, ZY; Zhang, HX; Zhang, S, 2010
)
0.36
" Therefore, they are regularly co-administered along with treatments at risk of drug-drug interactions."( Drug interactions with the tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib.
Buclin, T; Decosterd, LA; Duchosal, MA; Haouala, A; Montemurro, M; Widmer, N, 2011
)
0.37
"These findings suggest that surgical intervention in combination with imatinib treatment is more effective than imatinib alone against GIST liver metastases, with minimal complications and side effects."( Resection combined with imatinib therapy for liver metastases of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Ji, L; Li, X; Wu, XT; Xia, L; Zhang, MM, 2010
)
0.36
" To evaluate this effect in vivo, we performed a phase I study of chlorambucil combined with imatinib in relapsed CLL patients."( A phase I study of imatinib mesylate in combination with chlorambucil in previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients.
Aloyz, R; Amrein, L; Assouline, S; Caplan, S; Desjardins, P; Egorin, MJ; Hebb, J; Panasci, L; Rousseau, C, 2011
)
0.7
"A phase II trial to evaluate Im in combination with D in patients with recurrent NSCLC was conducted."( Potential role of platelet-derived growth factor receptor inhibition using imatinib in combination with docetaxel in the treatment of recurrent non-small cell lung cancer.
Allen, A; Hsueh, CT; Huang, CH; Kelly, K; Mayo, M; Smith, H; Tawfik, O; Uypeckcuat, AM; Van Veldhuizen, PJ; Wick, J; Williamson, SK, 2011
)
0.37
"Im in combination with D did not achieve its primary objective of improving response rate in patients with recurrent NSCLC."( Potential role of platelet-derived growth factor receptor inhibition using imatinib in combination with docetaxel in the treatment of recurrent non-small cell lung cancer.
Allen, A; Hsueh, CT; Huang, CH; Kelly, K; Mayo, M; Smith, H; Tawfik, O; Uypeckcuat, AM; Van Veldhuizen, PJ; Wick, J; Williamson, SK, 2011
)
0.37
"To evaluat the efficacy and safety of myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) combined with imatinib for advanced chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), 15 patients with accelerated phase (n=6) or blast crisis (n=9) were enrolled in this study."( Imatinib combined with myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for advanced phases of chronic myeloid leukemia.
Cai, Z; Han, X; He, J; Huang, H; Li, L; Lin, M; Luo, Y; Shi, J; Tan, Y; Xie, W; Ye, X; Zhao, Y; Zheng, Y, 2011
)
0.37
" In addition, nilotinib combined with the MEK1/2 inhibitor selumetinib (AZD6244) at low concentrations displayed stronger efficiency toward tumor growth inhibition, compared with nilotinib alone."( Nilotinib alone or in combination with selumetinib is a drug candidate for neurofibromatosis type 2.
Ammoun, S; Hanemann, CO; Manley, P; Schmid, MC; Triner, J, 2011
)
0.37
" This study aimed to define safe doses of gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin when combined with imatinib (potent PDGFR-β inhibitor) in patients with advanced gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer (PC)."( A dose escalation study of gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin in combination with imatinib for gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Barbachano, Y; Brown, G; Chau, I; Cunningham, D; Hawkes, EA; Oates, J; Starling, N; Thomas, J; Thomas, K; Watkins, D; Webb, J, 2012
)
0.38
"In gemcitabine-refractory PC, gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2)) and oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2)) can be safely combined with imatinib given on a 7 days on and 7 days off intermittent schedule."( A dose escalation study of gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin in combination with imatinib for gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Barbachano, Y; Brown, G; Chau, I; Cunningham, D; Hawkes, EA; Oates, J; Starling, N; Thomas, J; Thomas, K; Watkins, D; Webb, J, 2012
)
0.38
"To explore the effect of trichostatin A (TSA) alone and combination with imatinib on the proliferation and apoptosis of K562R cells."( [Effect of trichostatin alone and combination with imatinb on the proliferation and apoptosis of the K562R cells].
Chen, F; Chen, S; He, Q; Liu, Y; Zeng, H; Zhao, X, 2011
)
0.37
" Combined with imatinib, the effect of proliferation inhibition was better."( [Effect of trichostatin alone and combination with imatinb on the proliferation and apoptosis of the K562R cells].
Chen, F; Chen, S; He, Q; Liu, Y; Zeng, H; Zhao, X, 2011
)
0.37
"TSA combined with imatinib can inhibit the proliferation of K562R cells and induce its apopotosis."( [Effect of trichostatin alone and combination with imatinb on the proliferation and apoptosis of the K562R cells].
Chen, F; Chen, S; He, Q; Liu, Y; Zeng, H; Zhao, X, 2011
)
0.37
" Both patients received initial IM therapy combined with daunorubicin-based chemotherapy followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and IM maintenance treatment after allo-HSCT."( Prolonged survival with imatinib mesylate combined with chemotherapy and allogeneic stem cell transplantation in de novo Ph+ acute myeloid leukemia.
Allan, DS; Huang, H; Luo, Y; Sun, J; Tan, Y; Wang, Z, 2012
)
0.69
"Our cases indicate that IM combined with daunorubicin-based chemotherapy followed by allo-HSCT and IM maintenance treatment is associated with a favorable outcome for de novo Ph+ AML, especially when IM is used in an early phase of AML."( Prolonged survival with imatinib mesylate combined with chemotherapy and allogeneic stem cell transplantation in de novo Ph+ acute myeloid leukemia.
Allan, DS; Huang, H; Luo, Y; Sun, J; Tan, Y; Wang, Z, 2012
)
0.69
" All patients received IM combined with standard VDCP ± L as induction therapy then intensive consolidation with modified Hyper-CVAD/MA regimen plus IM, and followed by allo-SCT in CR1."( [Imatinib combined with modified hyper-CVAD/MA followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in CR1 as the front-line therapy for adult Ph(+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia].
Fu, MW; Huang, J; Li, ZJ; Qi, JY; Qiu, LG; Xu, Y; Zhao, YZ; Zou, DH, 2011
)
0.37
"IM combined with intensive chemotherapy significantly increased the CR rate and improved the quality of CR, which prepared the feasibility of allo-SCT in CR1."( [Imatinib combined with modified hyper-CVAD/MA followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in CR1 as the front-line therapy for adult Ph(+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia].
Fu, MW; Huang, J; Li, ZJ; Qi, JY; Qiu, LG; Xu, Y; Zhao, YZ; Zou, DH, 2011
)
0.37
" SIRT1 effects were enhanced in combination with the BCR-ABL TKI imatinib."( Activation of p53 by SIRT1 inhibition enhances elimination of CML leukemia stem cells in combination with imatinib.
Bhatia, R; Chen, W; Ho, Y; Holyoake, TL; Li, L; McDonald, T; Wang, L; Wang, Z, 2012
)
0.38
"To investigate the impact of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine(5-aza-CdR) combined with imatinib on the proliferation, motility, invasion, and apoptosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GIST) cells in vitro."( [Therapeutic effect of in vitro 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine combined with imatinib on gastrointestinal stromal tumor].
Liang, G; Liang, JF; Wu, LN; Xiao, H; Zhao, YZ; Zheng, HX, 2012
)
0.38
" Cyclosporine had an additive or synergistic effect on T-cell proliferation when combined with dasatinib and imatinib for 3 of the 4 methods of stimulating T-cell proliferation."( Drug-interaction studies evaluating T-cell proliferation reveal distinct activity of dasatinib and imatinib in combination with cyclosporine A.
Blake, SJ; Hughes, TP; Lyons, AB, 2012
)
0.38
" This phase I study aimed to assess the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of imatinib in combination with mFOLFOX6-bevacizumab in patients with advanced colorectal cancer and to identify pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions and toxicities."( A phase I trial of imatinib in combination with mFOLFOX6-bevacizumab in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Copeman, M; Gibbs, P; Gouillou, M; Jefford, M; Lipton, L; Lynch, K; McArthur, G; Michael, M; Tebbutt, NC; Zalcberg, J, 2013
)
0.39
"Leukemia, breast and cervical cancer cell lines were exposed to D3CLP-alone or in combination with imatinib, tamoxifen or cisplatin, respectively."( Synergistic anticancer activity of Thiazolo[5,4-b]quinoline derivative D3CLP in combination with cisplatin in human cervical cancer cells.
Cerbón, MA; Coronel-Cruz, C; González-Sánchez, I; Lira-Rocha, A; Loza-Mejía, MA; Mendoza-Rodríguez, CA; Navarrete, A, 2012
)
0.38
"Antiproliferative activity results indicate that D3CLP in combination with antineoplastic drugs induced a synergistic effect, at 3:1 and 1:1 ratios for D3CLP plus imatinib in K-562 leukemia cells, and at a 3:1 ratio for D3CLP with cisplatin in HeLa cells, as determined by their combination index."( Synergistic anticancer activity of Thiazolo[5,4-b]quinoline derivative D3CLP in combination with cisplatin in human cervical cancer cells.
Cerbón, MA; Coronel-Cruz, C; González-Sánchez, I; Lira-Rocha, A; Loza-Mejía, MA; Mendoza-Rodríguez, CA; Navarrete, A, 2012
)
0.38
" These findings suggest that RIC allo-HSCT combined with short-term imatinib mesylate does not necessarily have profound effects on female fertility."( Twin pregnancy and childbirth after reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation combined with imatinib mesylate for chronic myeloid leukaemia: case report and literature review.
Hu, YX; Huang, H; Lai, XY; Liu, LZ; Luo, Y; Tan, YM; Wu, KN; Zhao, YM, 2012
)
0.82
"To describe 12-month rates and patterns of coprescription of drugs that potentially create drug-drug interactions (DDIs) through shared metabolic or transport pathways for 9 enzyme-targeted kinase inhibitor oral antineoplastic drugs (OADs)."( Twelve-month frequency of drug-metabolizing enzyme and transporter-based drug-drug interaction potential in patients receiving oral enzyme-targeted kinase inhibitor antineoplastic agents.
Bowlin, SJ; Robinson, KD; Stanek, EJ; Wang, W; Xia, F, 2013
)
0.39
" One hundred nine patients aged 18-65 years were randomly assigned to either imatinib 800 mg (n = 55) or to imatinib 800 mg in combination with two successive cycles of cytarabine 200 mg/m(2) for 7 days (n = 54)."( High-dose imatinib versus high-dose imatinib in combination with intermediate-dose cytarabine in patients with first chronic phase myeloid leukemia: a randomized phase III trial of the Dutch-Belgian HOVON study group.
Ammerlaan, RA; Chu, IW; Cornelissen, JJ; Deenik, W; Falkenburg, JH; Janssen, JJ; Kersten, MJ; Ossenkoppele, GJ; Schattenberg, A; Schipperus, M; Sinnige, HA; Smit, WM; Sonneveld, P; Thielen, N; Valk, PJ; van der Holt, B; van Marwijk Kooy, R; Verhoef, GE, 2013
)
0.39
" NVP-BEZ235 in combination with nilotinib also inhibited tumor growth in a xenograft model and inhibited the growth of primary T315I mutant cells and ponatinib-resistant cells."( Efficacy of the dual PI3K and mTOR inhibitor NVP-BEZ235 in combination with nilotinib against BCR-ABL-positive leukemia cells involves the ABL kinase domain mutation.
Kimura, S; Kitahara, T; Maekawa, T; Ohyashiki, K; Okabe, S; Tanaka, Y; Tauchi, T, 2014
)
0.4
"The pegylated form of interferon-α-2a (PegIFNa2a) in combination with imatinib has demonstrated a molecular improvement in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia."( Tolerability and efficacy of pegylated interferon-α-2a in combination with imatinib for patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia.
Guilhot, F; Guilhot, J; Johnson-Ansah, H; Legros, L; Mahon, FX; Nicolini, FE; Preudhomme, C; Rea, D; Rigal-Huguet, F; Rousselot, P, 2013
)
0.39
"The results of the current study demonstrate that in combination with imatinib, the efficient dose of PegIFNa2a appears to be 45 μg/week."( Tolerability and efficacy of pegylated interferon-α-2a in combination with imatinib for patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia.
Guilhot, F; Guilhot, J; Johnson-Ansah, H; Legros, L; Mahon, FX; Nicolini, FE; Preudhomme, C; Rea, D; Rigal-Huguet, F; Rousselot, P, 2013
)
0.39
"Allo-SCT has a satisfactory outcome when combined with 2nd-generation TKI, which could provide a good quality of remission before transplantation and prevent relapse after transplantation."( Second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors combined with stem cell transplantation in patients with imatinib-refractory chronic myeloid leukemia.
Cai, Z; Huang, H; Luo, Y; Shi, J; Zhao, Y, 2014
)
0.4
"Conventional induction chemotherapy in combination with imatinib in the first induction therapy of adult Ph⁺ ALL, not only improved the rate of hematologic remission, also the rate of molecular response."( [Imatinib in combination with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation improved the outcome of adult Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia].
Chen, F; Chen, G; Cheng, Z; Fu, C; Jin, Z; Qiu, H; Sun, A; Tang, X; Wu, D; Xue, S; Zhao, L, 2014
)
0.4
" Therefore, we focused on the comparison of the efficacy between imatinib and nilotinib in combination with IL-2 in a murine B16F10 melanoma model."( Nilotinib combined with interleukin-2 mediates antitumor and immunological effects in a B16 melanoma model.
Bauer, R; Geisler, K; Jacobs, B; Kroeger, I; Mackensen, A; Meinhardt, K; Reischer, A; Ryffel, B; Ullrich, E, 2014
)
0.4
"The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the p15 gene combined with Bcr-abl-specific siRNA and STI571 on the proliferation, cell cycle and apoptosis of K562 chronic myeloid leukemia cells."( Study on the treatment of the p15 gene combined with Bcr-abl-specific siRNA and STI571 for chronic myeloid leukemia.
Du, Y; Li, NN; Lin, GQ; Lv, FF; Wang, W, 2014
)
0.4
" In this study, we identified eleven candidate anti-leukemic drugs that might be combined with imatinib, using three approaches: a kinase inhibitor library screen, a gene expression correlation analysis, and literature analysis."( Identification of drug combinations containing imatinib for treatment of BCR-ABL+ leukemias.
Hodges, A; Kang, Y; Ong, E; Paternostro, G; Piermarocchi, C; Roberts, W, 2014
)
0.4
" We therefore investigated the antiproliferative effects of nilotinib in combination with drugs that are usually used for conditioning: the alkylating agents mafosfamide, treosulfan, and busulfan."( In vitro testing of drug combinations employing nilotinib and alkylating agents with regard to pretransplant conditioning treatment of advanced-phase chronic myeloid leukemia.
Dreger, P; Fruehauf, S; Ho, AD; Jens Zeller, W; Luft, T; Radujkovic, A; Topaly, J, 2014
)
0.4
"Treatment of imatinib-sensitive, BCR-ABL-positive K562 and LAMA84 cells with nilotinib in combination with mafosfamide, treosulfan, or busulfan resulted in synergistic (CI < 1), additive (CI ~ 1), and predominantly antagonistic (CI > 1) effects, respectively."( In vitro testing of drug combinations employing nilotinib and alkylating agents with regard to pretransplant conditioning treatment of advanced-phase chronic myeloid leukemia.
Dreger, P; Fruehauf, S; Ho, AD; Jens Zeller, W; Luft, T; Radujkovic, A; Topaly, J, 2014
)
0.4
" Categorization of GIST based on KIT genotype and PI3K/PTEN genomic status combined with dose optimization is suggested for patient selection for clinical trials exploring such combinations."( Phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors combined with imatinib in patient-derived xenograft models of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: rationale and efficacy.
Debiec-Rychter, M; Fletcher, JA; Floris, G; Li, H; Manley, PW; Schöffski, P; Sciot, R; Van Looy, T; Vanleeuw, U; Wellens, J; Wozniak, A, 2014
)
0.4
"In this study, we randomly compared high doses of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib combined with reduced-intensity chemotherapy (arm A) to standard imatinib/hyperCVAD (cyclophosphamide/vincristine/doxorubicin/dexamethasone) therapy (arm B) in 268 adults (median age, 47 years) with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)."( Randomized study of reduced-intensity chemotherapy combined with imatinib in adults with Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Abbal, C; Berthon, C; Cayuela, JM; Chalandon, Y; Chevret, S; Dombret, H; Escoffre-Barbe, M; Hayette, S; Huguet, F; Ifrah, N; Lafage-Pochitaloff, M; Lambert, JF; Leguay, T; Lepretre, S; Lhéritier, V; Maury, S; Raffoux, E; Rousselot, P; Tavernier, E; Thomas, X, 2015
)
0.42
" These predictions were in good agreement with clinical single dose drug-drug interaction studies, but not with reports of imatinib interactions at steady-state."( Human hepatocyte assessment of imatinib drug-drug interactions - complexities in clinical translation.
Beumer, JH; Christner, SM; Kiesel, BF; Parise, RA; Pillai, VC; Rudek, MA; Venkataramanan, R, 2015
)
0.42
" We examined the effects of the MDM2 inhibitor nutlin3a and its combination with the dual Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL inhibitor ABT-737, and the Bcr-Abl inhibitor nilotinib on BC CML patient samples."( Synergistic effects of p53 activation via MDM2 inhibition in combination with inhibition of Bcl-2 or Bcr-Abl in CD34+ proliferating and quiescent chronic myeloid leukemia blast crisis cells.
Andreeff, M; Carter, BZ; Champlin, RE; Cortes, J; Kantarjian, HM; Konopleva, M; Mak, DH; Mak, PY; McQueen, T; Ruvolo, VR; Schober, W, 2015
)
0.42
"To investigate the inductive therapeutic effects of imatinib combined with VP low dose regiment on adult patients with Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph(+) ALL)."( [Imatinib Combined with VP Low Dose Regiment for Treating Newly Diagnosed Adult Patients with Ph-positive ALL].
Gao, XN; Guo, YL; Han, XP; Jin, XS; Jing, Y; Liu, K; Yao, ZL; Yu, L; Zhang, R, 2015
)
0.42
" Patients could be treated with imatinib combined with chemotherapy for consolidation and maintenance therapy or were treated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after complete remission."( [Imatinib Combined with VP Low Dose Regiment for Treating Newly Diagnosed Adult Patients with Ph-positive ALL].
Gao, XN; Guo, YL; Han, XP; Jin, XS; Jing, Y; Liu, K; Yao, ZL; Yu, L; Zhang, R, 2015
)
0.42
"In the period of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), inductive chemotherapy combined with imatinib and low dose VP can obtaine satisfactory CR rate and decrease the toxicity of the traditional drugs."( [Imatinib Combined with VP Low Dose Regiment for Treating Newly Diagnosed Adult Patients with Ph-positive ALL].
Gao, XN; Guo, YL; Han, XP; Jin, XS; Jing, Y; Liu, K; Yao, ZL; Yu, L; Zhang, R, 2015
)
0.42
" In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of CX and its combination with anticancer agent IM on human colorectal cancer HT-29 cell and their probable molecular targets."( The effect of celecoxib and its combination with imatinib on human HT-29 colorectal cancer cells: Involvement of COX-2, Caspase-3, VEGF and NF-κB genes expression.
Atari-Hajipirloo, S; Heydari, A; Kheradmand, F; Nikanfar, S; Noori, F, 2016
)
0.43
"Many patients treated with imatinib, used in cancer treatment, are using several other drugs that could interact with imatinib."( Drug-drug interactions with imatinib: An observational study.
Bondon-Guitton, E; Bourrel, R; Chebane, L; Despas, F; Lapeyre-Mestre, M; Montastruc, JL; Récoché, I; Rousseau, V, 2016
)
0.43
"To investigate the efficacy of targeted therapy combined with surgery in the treatment of recurrent and metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor(GIST)."( [Efficacy analysis of targeted therapy combined with surgery in the treatment of recurrent and metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor].
Fang, Y; Gao, X; Hou, Y; Li, H; Ling, J; Qin, J; Qin, X; Shen, K; Shu, P; Sun, Y; Wang, L; Xue, A, 2016
)
0.43
" According to different treatment methods, the patients were divided into four groups: surgery group (operation alone, 44 cases), target therapy group (imatinib alone, 108 cases), target therapy combined with surgery group (imatinib plus operation, 139 cases), other therapy group (chemotherapy, Chinese medicine and others, 27 cases)."( [Efficacy analysis of targeted therapy combined with surgery in the treatment of recurrent and metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor].
Fang, Y; Gao, X; Hou, Y; Li, H; Ling, J; Qin, J; Qin, X; Shen, K; Shu, P; Sun, Y; Wang, L; Xue, A, 2016
)
0.43
"Target therapy combined with surgery can prolong the survival of recurrent and metastatic GIST patients."( [Efficacy analysis of targeted therapy combined with surgery in the treatment of recurrent and metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor].
Fang, Y; Gao, X; Hou, Y; Li, H; Ling, J; Qin, J; Qin, X; Shen, K; Shu, P; Sun, Y; Wang, L; Xue, A, 2016
)
0.43
"To explore the effects of homoharringtonine (HHT) alone or combined with imatinib (IM) on K562 cell proliferation and apoptosis, as well as the mRNA and protein expression of BCL6."( [Effects of Homoharringtonine Combined with Imatinib on K562 Cell Apoptosis and BCL6 expression].
Ding, W; Ding, YH; Li, YF; Wang, Q; Wu, JJ, 2016
)
0.43
" The effect of drug combination showed that BCL6 protein significantly down-regulated(P<0."( [Effects of Homoharringtonine Combined with Imatinib on K562 Cell Apoptosis and BCL6 expression].
Ding, W; Ding, YH; Li, YF; Wang, Q; Wu, JJ, 2016
)
0.43
"To explore the effect of homoharringtonine(HHT) combined with imatinib(IM) on proliferation and apoptosis of K562/G01 cells and its potential mechanism."( [Effect of Homoharringtonine Combined with Imatinib on the K562/G01 Cells and Its Mechanism].
Deng, ZK; Ding, YH; Li, YF; Lu, XY; Shi, YY; Wu, JJ, 2017
)
0.46
"HHT combined with IM can synergistically inhibit proliferation and induce apoptosis of K562/G01 cells by suppressing the p210 expression and its kinase activity."( [Effect of Homoharringtonine Combined with Imatinib on the K562/G01 Cells and Its Mechanism].
Deng, ZK; Ding, YH; Li, YF; Lu, XY; Shi, YY; Wu, JJ, 2017
)
0.46
" We report the single most extensive analysis of data from China to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the procedure combined with neoadjuvant imatinib therapy to treat patients with rectal GISTs."( A Novel Curative Treatment Strategy for Patients with Lower Grade Rectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: Chemoreduction Combined with Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery.
Han, X; Lin, G; Qiu, H; Xu, J, 2017
)
0.46
" NVP-BEZ235 in combination with imatinib was also used to reveal the effect on proliferation and apoptosis."( Efficacy of the dual PI3K and mTOR inhibitor NVP-BEZ235 in combination with imatinib mesylate against chronic myelogenous leukemia cell lines.
Huang, Y; Li, C; Peng, Q; Xiao, H; Xin, P; Zheng, Y; Zhu, X, 2017
)
0.68
" Moreover, imatinib in combination with NVP-BEZ235 induced a more pronounced colony growth inhibition than imatinib alone."( Efficacy of the dual PI3K and mTOR inhibitor NVP-BEZ235 in combination with imatinib mesylate against chronic myelogenous leukemia cell lines.
Huang, Y; Li, C; Peng, Q; Xiao, H; Xin, P; Zheng, Y; Zhu, X, 2017
)
0.68
" After demonstrating the safety and feasibility in a phase I study, we conducted a phase II clinical study of CLAG (cladribine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) regimen combined with IM for patients with RR-AML."( A Phase II Study of CLAG Regimen Combined With Imatinib Mesylate for Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Cubitt, C; Komrokji, RS; Lancet, JE; List, AF; Mirza, AS; Nardelli, L; Padron, E; Pinilla-Ibarz, J; Sweet, K, 2017
)
0.71
" Vitamin D compounds have been shown to exert synergistic effects when used in combination with different agents used in anticancer therapies in different cancer models."( Vitamin D derivatives potentiate the anticancer and anti-angiogenic activity of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in combination with cytostatic drugs in an A549 non-small cell lung cancer model.
Filip-Psurska, B; Kutner, A; Maj, E; Milczarek, M; Psurski, M; Wietrzyk, J, 2018
)
0.48
"In the present study, we evaluate the in vitro cytotoxicity of fucoxanthin (Fx) on two human leukemia cell lines, K562 and TK6, alone and in combination with the conventional anticancer drugs imatinib (Imat) and doxorubicin (Dox)."( Cytotoxic activity of fucoxanthin, alone and in combination with the cancer drugs imatinib and doxorubicin, in CML cell lines.
Almeida, TP; Azqueta, A; Ferreira, J; Ramos, AA; Rocha, E; Vettorazzi, A, 2018
)
0.48
" To investigate the effect and mechanism of PD alone or combined with imatinib (IM) in inhibiting CML imatinib resistant cell line K562/R, the cell proliferation was examined by CCK8 assay to reveal the effect of PD on the inhibitory function of imatinib."( [Inhibitory effect and mechanism of platycodin D combined with imatinib on K562/R].
Dai, Q; Ge, YQ, 2018
)
0.48
" In FGF stimulated GIST cell lines, BGJ398, a pan-FGFR kinase inhibitor in combination with imatinib, was cytotoxic and superior to imatinib therapy alone."( A phase Ib study of BGJ398, a pan-FGFR kinase inhibitor in combination with imatinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor.
Antonescu, CR; Chi, P; D'Angelo, SP; DeMatteo, RP; Dickson, MA; Francis, JH; Gounder, MM; Heinemann, MH; Hwang, S; Kelly, CM; Keohan, ML; Mcfadyen, C; Qin, LX; Shoushtari, AN; Singer, S; Sjoberg, A; Tap, WD, 2019
)
0.51
"This Phase 1b, multicentre, open-label study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or a recommended Phase 2 dose of buparlisib in combination with 400 mg of imatinib through a dose-escalation part and a dose-expansion part, and also evaluated the clinical profile of the combination."( Imatinib in combination with phosphoinositol kinase inhibitor buparlisib in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumour who failed prior therapy with imatinib and sunitinib: a Phase 1b, multicentre study.
Aimone, P; Benson, C; Brandt, U; Doi, T; Gelderblom, H; George, S; Hertle, S; Jones, RL; Le Cesne, A; Leahy, M; Renouf, DJ; Schӧffski, P; Valverde Morales, C, 2020
)
0.56
"Buparlisib in combination with imatinib provided no additional benefit compared with currently available therapies."( Imatinib in combination with phosphoinositol kinase inhibitor buparlisib in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumour who failed prior therapy with imatinib and sunitinib: a Phase 1b, multicentre study.
Aimone, P; Benson, C; Brandt, U; Doi, T; Gelderblom, H; George, S; Hertle, S; Jones, RL; Le Cesne, A; Leahy, M; Renouf, DJ; Schӧffski, P; Valverde Morales, C, 2020
)
0.56
"To investigate the curative efficacy of first generation TKI in the treatment of CML-CP combined with vPh and genetic characteristics."( [Curative Efficacy of First Generation TKI in the Treatment of CML-CP Combined with vPh and Analysis of Its Genetic Characteristics].
Liu, L; Tan, L; Xie, Y; Yang, J, 2020
)
0.56
"60 patients with CML-CP combined with vPh from January 2010 to May 2017 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University were chosen as CML-CP-vPh group, and 107 patients with CML-CP combined with typical Ph chromosome at the same time were chosen as control group."( [Curative Efficacy of First Generation TKI in the Treatment of CML-CP Combined with vPh and Analysis of Its Genetic Characteristics].
Liu, L; Tan, L; Xie, Y; Yang, J, 2020
)
0.56
"Patients with CML-CP combined with vPh possess higher primary drug-resistance rate and primary hematological drug-resistance rate for the first generation TKI, while second-generation TKI can efficiently improve long-term survival, its efficacy is similar to efficacy for patients with typical Ph chromosomes."( [Curative Efficacy of First Generation TKI in the Treatment of CML-CP Combined with vPh and Analysis of Its Genetic Characteristics].
Liu, L; Tan, L; Xie, Y; Yang, J, 2020
)
0.56
"We treated T-ALL cell lines in vitro and T-ALL patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models in vivo with MRK-560 alone or in combination with other targeted inhibitors (ruxolitinib, imatinib or KPT-8602/eltanexor)."( PSEN1-selective gamma-secretase inhibition in combination with kinase or XPO-1 inhibitors effectively targets T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Boeckx, N; Cools, J; De Keersmaecker, K; Gielen, O; Govaerts, I; Jacobs, K; Maertens, J; Nittner, D; Prieto, C; Provost, S; Segers, H; Vandersmissen, C, 2021
)
0.62
"All NOTCH1-signaling-dependent T-ALL cell lines were sensitive to MRK-560 and its combination with ruxolitinib or imatinib in JAK1- or ABL1-dependent cell lines synergistically inhibited leukemia proliferation."( PSEN1-selective gamma-secretase inhibition in combination with kinase or XPO-1 inhibitors effectively targets T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Boeckx, N; Cools, J; De Keersmaecker, K; Gielen, O; Govaerts, I; Jacobs, K; Maertens, J; Nittner, D; Prieto, C; Provost, S; Segers, H; Vandersmissen, C, 2021
)
0.62
" The aim of this study was to assess the potential P-gp-mediated drug-drug interactions between 11 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with apixaban and rivaroxaban."( Tyrosine kinase inhibitors and direct oral anticoagulants: In vitro evaluation of drug-drug interaction mediated by P-glycoprotein.
Bertoletti, L; Bin, V; Delavenne, X; Hodin, S; Lafaie, L; Saïb, S, 2022
)
0.72
" This study investigated the safety, tolerability and efficacy of alpelisib, a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor, used in combination with imatinib in patients with advanced GIST who had failed prior therapy with both imatinib and sunitinib."( A multicenter, dose-finding, phase 1b study of imatinib in combination with alpelisib as third-line treatment in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor.
Bauer, S; Berhanu, G; Brandt, U; Gelderblom, H; Grignani, G; Heinrich, MC; Italiano, A; Pantaleo, MA; Reichardt, P; Reyners, AKL; Schöffski, P; Stark, D; Stefanelli, T; Valverde, C, 2022
)
0.72
" These were combined with 400 mg QD imatinib until maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of alpelisib in combination with imatinib was determined."( A multicenter, dose-finding, phase 1b study of imatinib in combination with alpelisib as third-line treatment in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor.
Bauer, S; Berhanu, G; Brandt, U; Gelderblom, H; Grignani, G; Heinrich, MC; Italiano, A; Pantaleo, MA; Reichardt, P; Reyners, AKL; Schöffski, P; Stark, D; Stefanelli, T; Valverde, C, 2022
)
0.72
" The MTD of alpelisib given with imatinib was determined as 350 mg QD."( A multicenter, dose-finding, phase 1b study of imatinib in combination with alpelisib as third-line treatment in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor.
Bauer, S; Berhanu, G; Brandt, U; Gelderblom, H; Grignani, G; Heinrich, MC; Italiano, A; Pantaleo, MA; Reichardt, P; Reyners, AKL; Schöffski, P; Stark, D; Stefanelli, T; Valverde, C, 2022
)
0.72
"The MTD of alpelisib was estimated as 350 mg QD when used in combination with imatinib 400 mg QD after oral administration in patients with advanced GIST."( A multicenter, dose-finding, phase 1b study of imatinib in combination with alpelisib as third-line treatment in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor.
Bauer, S; Berhanu, G; Brandt, U; Gelderblom, H; Grignani, G; Heinrich, MC; Italiano, A; Pantaleo, MA; Reichardt, P; Reyners, AKL; Schöffski, P; Stark, D; Stefanelli, T; Valverde, C, 2022
)
0.72
"The study intended to explore the effects and molecular mechanisms of imatinib combined with everolimus on AtT-20 cells in AtT-20 mouse pituitary tumors."( Effects of Imatinib Combined With Everolimus on Mouse Pituitary Tumor Cell AtT-20.
Lin, Y; Meng, L; Qu, X; Wang, W; Yang, J, 2023
)
0.91
"Imatinib combined with everolimus can affect the AtT-20 cell cycle through the signaling pathway of the phosphatidylin-ositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt/ protein kinase A (PKA) system and can inhibit cell proliferation and induce cell apoptosis."( Effects of Imatinib Combined With Everolimus on Mouse Pituitary Tumor Cell AtT-20.
Lin, Y; Meng, L; Qu, X; Wang, W; Yang, J, 2023
)
0.91
" Here, we show that ISR inhibition combined with imatinib treatment sensitized and more effectively eradicated leukemic cells both in vitro and in vivo compared to treatment with single agents."( Targeting integrated stress response with ISRIB combined with imatinib treatment attenuates RAS/RAF/MAPK and STAT5 signaling and eradicates chronic myeloid leukemia cells.
Brewinska-Olchowik, M; Dudka, W; Hoser, G; Klejman, A; Kominek, A; Kusio-Kobialka, M; Machnicki, MM; Mondal, SS; Piwocka, K; Seferynska, I; Stoklosa, T; Swatler, J; Turos-Korgul, L; Wiech, M; Wołczyk, M, 2022
)
0.72
" The impact of drug-drug interaction (DDI) also differs between drugs with low or high oral bioavailability."( Considering the Oral Bioavailability of Protein Kinase Inhibitors: Essential in Assessing the Extent of Drug-Drug Interaction and Improving Clinical Practice.
Chatelut, E; Le Louedec, F; Puisset, F; Tod, M, 2023
)
0.91
"The introduction of protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs) for chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) has considerably improved prognosis of the disease but has also demonstrated a great potential for drug-drug interactions."( Drug-drug interactions of protein kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukaemia patients: A study using the French health insurance database.
Despas, F; Lapeyre-Mestre, M; Pajiep, M, 2023
)
0.91
"Chronic oral anticancer therapies, are increasingly prescribed and present new challenges including the enhanced risk of overlooked drug-drug interactions (DDIs)."( The use of therapeutic drug monitoring to highlight an over-looked drug-drug interaction leading to imatinib treatment failure.
Buonadonna, A; Canil, G; Cecchin, E; Dalle Fratte, C; Gagno, S; Guardascione, M; Orleni, M; Posocco, B; Roncato, R; Toffoli, G; Zanchetta, M, 2023
)
0.91
" Drug-drug interactions were evaluated though Lexicomp."( The use of therapeutic drug monitoring to highlight an over-looked drug-drug interaction leading to imatinib treatment failure.
Buonadonna, A; Canil, G; Cecchin, E; Dalle Fratte, C; Gagno, S; Guardascione, M; Orleni, M; Posocco, B; Roncato, R; Toffoli, G; Zanchetta, M, 2023
)
0.91
"Tyrosine kinase inhibitors combined with conventional chemotherapy (CC) in treating Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph-positive ALL) has achieved promising efficacy and safety outcomes."( Cost-effectiveness analysis of imatinib versus dasatinib in the treatment of pediatric Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia when combined with conventional chemotherapy in China.
Chen, M; Lin, Y; Liu, L; Lu, X; Ni, J; Yang, H; Zhang, L, 2023
)
0.91
"A Markov model was established to simulate a hypothetical cohort of pediatric Ph-positive ALL patients receiving imatinib or dasatinib, combined with CC."( Cost-effectiveness analysis of imatinib versus dasatinib in the treatment of pediatric Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia when combined with conventional chemotherapy in China.
Chen, M; Lin, Y; Liu, L; Lu, X; Ni, J; Yang, H; Zhang, L, 2023
)
0.91
" The probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that treatment with dasatinib combined with CC achieved a 96."( Cost-effectiveness analysis of imatinib versus dasatinib in the treatment of pediatric Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia when combined with conventional chemotherapy in China.
Chen, M; Lin, Y; Liu, L; Lu, X; Ni, J; Yang, H; Zhang, L, 2023
)
0.91
"Dasatinib combined with CC is likely to be a cost-effective strategy compared to imatinib combination therapy for pediatric Ph-positive ALL in China at a WTP threshold of $37,765/QALY."( Cost-effectiveness analysis of imatinib versus dasatinib in the treatment of pediatric Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia when combined with conventional chemotherapy in China.
Chen, M; Lin, Y; Liu, L; Lu, X; Ni, J; Yang, H; Zhang, L, 2023
)
0.91

Bioavailability

Imatinib mesylate (IMS) is an anti-cancer drug. Its bioavailability is more than 97%. The exact gastrointestinal site of its absorption is unknown.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" STI 571 is highly bioavailable in oral form and produced minimal toxicities in phase I studies."( Tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a cure for chronic myeloid leukemia?
Zitella, L,
)
0.13
"Imatinib (Gleevec) (formerly STI571) is an orally bioavailable rationally developed inhibitor of the tyrosine kinases Bcr-Abl, Kit, and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)."( Imatinib: a targeted clinical drug development.
Capdeville, R; Silberman, S, 2003
)
0.32
"The purpose of this study was to investigate the absolute bioavailability of a single oral dose of imatinib (Glivec), 400 mg (capsules vs."( Absolute bioavailability of imatinib (Glivec) orally versus intravenous infusion.
Ben-Am, M; Capdeville, R; Dutreix, C; Hayes, MJ; Lloyd, P; Mehring, G; Peng, B; Pokorny, R; Seiberling, M, 2004
)
0.32
" BMS-354825 is an orally bioavailable ABL kinase inhibitor with two-log increased potency relative to imatinib that retains activity against 14 of 15 imatinib-resistant BCR-ABL mutants."( Overriding imatinib resistance with a novel ABL kinase inhibitor.
Chen, P; Lee, FY; Norris, D; Sawyers, CL; Shah, NP; Tran, C, 2004
)
0.32
" Finally, alterations of drug transporters or drug-metabolizing pathways may block the bioavailability of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (drug-dependent resistance)."( Mechanisms of clinical resistance to small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting oncogenic tyrosine kinases.
Aulitzky, WE; Oetzel, C; Schwab, M; van der Kuip, H; Wohlbold, L, 2005
)
0.33
" Both ABCG2 and ABCB1 are normally expressed in the gastrointestinal tract and it might be anticipated that drug-induced upregulation of these intestinal pumps could reduce the oral bioavailability of imatinib, representing a novel mechanism of acquired pharmacokinetic drug resistance in cancer patients that are chronically treated with imatinib."( Chronic imatinib mesylate exposure leads to reduced intracellular drug accumulation by induction of the ABCG2 (BCRP) and ABCB1 (MDR1) drug transport pumps.
Brok, M; Burger, H; de Boeck, G; de Bruijn, EA; Guetens, G; Nooter, K; Sparreboom, A; van Tol, H; Verweij, J; Wiemer, EA, 2005
)
0.76
" AMN107 is a novel, orally bioavailable ATP-competitive inhibitor of Bcr-Abl."( AMN107, a novel aminopyrimidine inhibitor of Bcr-Abl, has in vitro activity against imatinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia.
Alland, L; Arlinghaus, RB; Beran, M; Cortes, J; Dugan, M; Giles, F; Golemovic, M; Griffin, JD; Kantarjian, H; Manley, PW; Manshouri, T; Mestan, J; Sun, T; Verstovsek, S, 2005
)
0.33
" Pharmacokinetic studies of imatinib in healthy volunteers and patients with CML, GIST and other cancers show that orally administered imatinib is well absorbed, and has an absolute bioavailability of 98% irrespective of oral dosage form (solution, capsule, tablet) or dosage strength (100 mg, 400 mg)."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of imatinib.
Lloyd, P; Peng, B; Schran, H, 2005
)
0.33
" Dasatinib (BMS-354825) is a novel orally bioavailable SRC/ABL inhibitor that has activity against multiple imatinib-resistant BCR-ABL isoforms in vitro that is presently showing considerable promise in early-phase clinical trials of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)."( Dasatinib (BMS-354825) inhibits KITD816V, an imatinib-resistant activating mutation that triggers neoplastic growth in most patients with systemic mastocytosis.
Akin, C; Donker, M; Jiang, Y; Lee, FY; Luo, R; Shah, NP, 2006
)
0.33
" BMS-354825 is an orally bioavailable dual Src/Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor currently undergoing clinical trials in cancer patients."( Potent inhibition of platelet-derived growth factor-induced responses in vascular smooth muscle cells by BMS-354825 (dasatinib).
Bhalla, KN; Chen, Z; Lee, FY; Wu, J, 2006
)
0.33
" An extensive search for molecules to block the aberrant BCR-ABL1 protein resulted in the development of IM as an orally bioavailable agent with remarkable efficacy in producing hematologic, cytogenetic, and molecular remissions."( Imatinib resistance: obstacles and opportunities.
Litzow, MR, 2006
)
0.33
" Although the bioavailability of imatinib mesylate is more than 97%, the exact gastrointestinal site of its absorption is unknown."( Disposition of imatinib and its metabolite CGP74588 in a patient with chronic myelogenous leukemia and short-bowel syndrome.
Beumer, JH; Egorin, MJ; Lagattuta, TF; Natale, JJ; Raptis, A, 2006
)
0.62
" When ciclosporin (10 mg kg(-1)) was orally administered, the time course, area under the curve, bioavailability and peak blood concentration of ciclosporin were significantly increased in rats that had been treated with imatinib mesilate 2 h before ciclosporin administration as compared with the control."( Effect of imatinib mesilate on the disposition kinetics of ciclosporin in rats.
Fujii, Y; Higashi, Y; Imamura, M; Kajita, T; Maida, C; Miyamoto, E; Yamamoto, I, 2006
)
0.33
" This agent is also orally bioavailable and has been found to be effective in clinical trials."( Mechanisms of resistance to imatinib in CML patients: a paradigm for the advantages and pitfalls of molecularly targeted therapy.
Nichols, G; Ritchie, E, 2006
)
0.33
" This orally bioavailable drug has a low toxicity profile."( [STI571: a summary of targeted therapy].
Czyz, M; Jakubowska, J, 2006
)
0.33
"Lonafarnib is an orally bioavailable nonpetidomimetic farnesyl transferase inhibitor with significant activity against BCR-ABL-positive cell lines and primary human chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) cells."( Phase 1 study of lonafarnib (SCH 66336) and imatinib mesylate in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who have failed prior single-agent therapy with imatinib.
Cortes, J; Daley, GQ; Ferrajoli, A; Jabbour, E; Kantarjian, H; Koller, C; O'Brien, S; Statkevich, P; Verstovsek, S; Zhu, Y, 2007
)
0.6
"The tolerability and efficacy of the combination of tipifarnib, an orally bioavailable nonpeptidomimetic farnesyl transferase inhibitor, and imatinib was investigated in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase who had failed imatinib."( Phase 1 study of tipifarnib in combination with imatinib for patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase after imatinib failure.
Cortes, J; Ebarb, T; Faderl, S; Garcia-Manero, G; Giles, F; Jones, D; Kantarjian, H; O'Brien, S; Quintás-Cardama, A; Thomas, D, 2007
)
0.34
" In this study, we show that carboxyamidotriazole (CAI), an orally bioavailable calcium influx and signal transduction inhibitor, is equally effective in inhibiting the proliferation and bcr-abl dependent- and independent-signaling pathways in imatinib-resistant CML cells."( Effects of carboxyamidotriazole on in vitro models of imatinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia.
Alessandro, R; Colomba, P; Corrado, C; De Leo, G; Flugy, AM; Fontana, S; Giordano, M; Kohn, EC; Santoro, A, 2008
)
0.35
" More recently, attention has turned to the relative roles of drug bioavailability and drug efflux and drug influx proteins in the development of resistance to imatinib."( Part I: mechanisms of resistance to imatinib in chronic myeloid leukaemia.
Apperley, JF, 2007
)
0.34
" A population analysis done in NONMEM with a time-dependent covariate confirmed that ritonavir did not influence the clearance or bioavailability of imatinib."( Influence of CYP3A4 inhibition on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of imatinib.
Baker, SD; Gelderblom, H; Guchelaar, HJ; Karlsson, MO; Li, J; Nortier, JW; Ouwerkerk, J; Sparreboom, A; van Erp, NP; Zhao, M, 2007
)
0.34
"Besides affecting the systemic bioavailability of the parent drug, drug metabolizing enzymes (DMEs) may produce bioactive and/or toxic metabolites of clinical interest."( Imatinib metabolite profiling in parallel to imatinib quantification in plasma of treated patients using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.
Biollaz, J; Décosterd, LA; Fayet, A; Lahrichi, SL; Pesse, B; Rochat, B; Widmer, N, 2008
)
0.35
" bioavailability and brain penetration of chemotherapy drugs in animal models, we sought to examine the effect of sunitinib on the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) drug transporters P-glycoprotein (P-gp, ABCB1), the multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 (ABCC1), and ABCG2, which are known to transport a wide variety of anticancer drugs."( Sunitinib (Sutent, SU11248), a small-molecule receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, blocks function of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) and ABCG2.
Ambudkar, SV; Bates, SE; Robey, RW; Shukla, S, 2009
)
0.35
" As a complementary approach, cell-based, target-driven secondary screens may help predict in vivo compound potency and specificity as well as evaluate bioavailability and toxicity."( Cell treatment and lysis in 96-well filter-bottom plates for screening Bcr-Abl activity and inhibition in whole-cell extracts.
Kron, SJ; Mand, MR; Veach, DR; Wu, D, 2010
)
0.36
" Ketoconazole and primaquine affect imatinib clearance, bioavailability and distribution pattern, which could improve the treatment of renal and brain tumors, but also increase toxicity."( Differential effects of ketoconazole and primaquine on the pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of imatinib in mice.
Bukhari, NI; Chay, G; Kan, E; Law, JH; Lim, WY; Segarra, I; Soo, GW; Tan, SY, 2010
)
0.36
" Major gastrectomy decreased the bioavailability of nilotinib and, in some patients, lowered its clinical activity."( Nilotinib in patients with GIST who failed imatinib and sunitinib: importance of prior surgery on drug bioavailability.
Beck, MY; Chang, HM; Choi, DR; Kang, YK; Kim, KP; Kim, TW; Lee, JL; Ryoo, BY; Ryu, MH; Yoo, C, 2011
)
0.37
"The bioavailability of orally administered imatinib is >90%, although the drug is monocationic under the acidic conditions in the duodenum."( Environmental and genetic factors affecting transport of imatinib by OATP1A2.
Boere, I; Eechoute, K; Franke, RM; Gurney, H; Kim, RB; Loos, WJ; Mathijssen, RH; Scherkenbach, LA; Sparreboom, A; Tirona, RG; Verweij, J, 2011
)
0.37
" The bioavailability of intraperitoneally administered imatinib-ULS-lysozyme was 100%."( Imatinib-ULS-lysozyme: a proximal tubular cell-targeted conjugate of imatinib for the treatment of renal diseases.
Dolman, ME; Hennink, WE; Kok, RJ; Lacombe, M; Pato, J; Pieters, EH; Storm, G; van Dorenmalen, KM, 2012
)
0.38
" In conclusion, saquinavir and imatinib are both drugs utilized for long-term therapies, with good oral bioavailability and a well-known toxicity profile."( In vitro anti-neuroblastoma activity of saquinavir and its association with imatinib.
Cordero di Montezemolo, L; Crescenzio, N; Doria, A; Fagioli, F; Foglia, L; Pagliano, S; Ricotti, E; Timeus, F; Tovo, PA, 2012
)
0.38
" Carboxyamidotriazole-orotate (CTO) is the orotate salt form of carboxyamidotriazole (CAI), an orally bioavailable signal transduction inhibitor that in vitro has been shown to possess antileukaemic activities."( Carboxyamidotriazole-orotate inhibits the growth of imatinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukaemia cells and modulates exosomes-stimulated angiogenesis.
Alessandro, R; Corrado, C; De Leo, G; Flugy, AM; Guggino, G; Karmali, R; Raimondo, S; Taverna, S, 2012
)
0.38
" Herein, we report GZD824 (10a) as a novel orally bioavailable inhibitor against a broad spectrum of Bcr-Abl mutants including T315I."( Identification of GZD824 as an orally bioavailable inhibitor that targets phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated breakpoint cluster region-Abelson (Bcr-Abl) kinase and overcomes clinically acquired mutation-induced resistance against imatinib.
Bai, Y; Ding, K; Feng, Y; Lang, X; Leng, F; Li, Y; Liu, J; Long, H; Lu, X; Luo, J; Pan, J; Pan, X; Ren, X; She, M; Tu, Z; Wang, D; Wen, D; Zhang, F; Zhang, Z; Zhuang, X, 2013
)
0.39
"Given that the validated method has proved to be linear, accurate, precise, and robust, it is suitable for pharmacokinetic assays, such as bioavailability and bioequivalence, and is being successfully applied in routine therapeutic drug monitoring in the hospital service."( Quantification of imatinib in human serum: validation of a high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method for therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacokinetic assays.
Bendit, I; de Alencar Fisher Chamone, D; Novaes, MM; Rezende, VM; Rivellis, A, 2013
)
0.39
" The results show that the good bioavailability of imatinib is highly likely achieved by its active absorption from the intestine and that its active elimination through the intestinal mucosa is mediated by a synergistic activity of organic cation transporter 1 in the basolateral membrane and the added activity of two efflux proteins (P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistant protein) in the apical membrane of enterocytes of the rat ileum."( Absorption and elimination of imatinib through the rat intestine in vitro.
Cernelč, P; Kralj, E; Kristl, A; Roškar, R; Trontelj, J; Zakelj, S, 2014
)
0.4
" Indeed, the Supreme Court stated that even if the bioavailability of the drug was improved, it did not demonstrate enhanced efficacy and that Glivec was not patentable."( "To patent or not to patent? the case of Novartis' cancer drug Glivec in India".
Gabble, R; Kohler, JC, 2014
)
0.4
" We have examined the biological effects of a highly selective, orally bioavailable JAK2 inhibitor, BMS-911543, in combination with TKIs on CD34+ treatment-naïve IM-nonresponder cells."( Selective JAK2/ABL dual inhibition therapy effectively eliminates TKI-insensitive CML stem/progenitor cells.
Chen, M; Jiang, X; Lin, H; Lorenzi, MV; Rothe, K; Woolfson, A, 2014
)
0.4
" ABCB1 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been reported as modulators of ABCB1-mediated transport, affecting IM's bioavailability and consequently the treatment outcome of IM therapy."( ABCB1 haplotypes but not individual SNPs predict for optimal response/failure in Egyptian patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia receiving imatinib mesylate.
Ali, MA; Elsalakawy, WA, 2014
)
0.6
"The aim of the study was to investigate the bioavailability of a generic product of 100 mg and 400 mg imatinib film-coated tablets (test) as compared to that of a branded product (reference) at the same strength to determine bioequivalence."( Bioequivalence study of 400 and 100 mg imatinib film-coated tablets in healthy volunteers.
Boguradzki, P; Mikołajczak, PL; Ostrowicz, A; Wierzbicka, M,
)
0.13
" IMT-NLC displayed sustained IMT release in vitro, significantly enhanced in vivo bioavailability of IMT after intravenous and oral administration, and greater in vitro cytotoxicity on NCI-H727 cells, compared with free IMT."( Modulation of Pharmacokinetic and Cytotoxicity Profile of Imatinib Base by Employing Optimized Nanostructured Lipid Carriers.
Cho, HJ; Choi, HG; Gupta, B; Jeong, JH; Kim, JO; Poudel, BK; Pradhan, R; Shin, BS; Tran, TH; Yong, CS, 2015
)
0.42
" Doubts on the bioequivalence and bioavailability of emerging generic compounds have been expressed."( Comparison of Branded and Generic Imatinib Plasma Concentrations in Patients With Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia: Unicentric Study.
Basic-Kinda, S; Granic, P; Matic, N; Nemet, D; Ostojic, A; Peric, Z; Radman, I; Roncevic, P; Sertic, D; Serventi-Seiwerth, R; Zadro, R, 2016
)
0.43
" However, a minority of patients fail to achieve optimal response due to impaired bioavailability of IM."( hOCT1 gene expression predict for optimal response to Imatinib in Tunisian patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Abbes, S; Amouri, H; Bellaaj, H; Ben Hadj Othman, H; Ben Hassine, I; Farrah, A; Gharbi, H; Lakhal, RB; Menif, S; Romdhane, NB; Soltani, I; Teber, M, 2017
)
0.46
" Whole blood count, ethnicity, CYP3A5*3, and ABCB1 C3435T were found to have significant influence on the apparent clearance, while the interindividual variability in clearance and interoccasion variability in bioavailability were 17."( Population Pharmacokinetics of Imatinib in Nigerians With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Clinical Implications for Dosing and Resistance.
Adeagbo, BA; Bolaji, OO; Bolarinwa, RA; Durosinmi, MA; Ogungbenro, K; Olugbade, TA, 2017
)
0.46
" Results from permeability studies evidenced that SYA did not impact Imatinib's permeability across membranes while suggesting improved bioavailability through higher kinetic solubility at the biological barriers."( Bioinspired co-crystals of Imatinib providing enhanced kinetic solubility.
Dix, I; Galli, B; Gutmann, M; Harlacher, C; Holzgrabe, U; Meinel, L; Müller-Buschbaum, K; Piechon, P; Reggane, M; Saedtler, M; Wiest, J; Zottnick, SH, 2018
)
0.48
"32-fold, and the bioavailability was greatly decreased about 30."( Effects of aprepitant on the pharmacokinetics of imatinib and its main metabolite in rats.
Darbalaei, S; Han, X; Lu, Y; Qin, Y; Rang, Y; Wang, N; Zhai, X; Zhang, X, 2018
)
0.48
"Marked inter-species variability in PK parameters and resulting oral bioavailability was observed."( Preclinical pharmacokinetic evaluation to facilitate repurposing of tyrosine kinase inhibitors nilotinib and imatinib as antiviral agents.
Ananthula, HK; Buller, RM; Damon, IK; Desai, PB; Gallardo-Romero, N; Kalman, D; Moir-Savitz, T; Olson, V; Parker, S; Patel, G; Sallans, L; Salzer, JS; Sherwin, CM; Touchette, E; Werner, MH, 2018
)
0.48
" N-oleoyl-D-galactosamine was synthesized for fabricating biomimetic galactose-modified nanoparticles (GNPs) in an attempt to improve the oral bioavailability of IMT."( Oral delivery of imatinib through galactosylated polymeric nanoparticles to explore the contribution of a saccharide ligand to absorption.
Li, Y; Yang, B; Zhang, X, 2019
)
0.51
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51
"Here we describe the development and validation of an LC-MS/MS method for the quantification of imatinib and imatinib-d8 in plasma for the support of a clinical absolute bioavailability microdosing trial."( Development and validation of an LC-MS/MS method for the quantification of imatinib and imatinib-d8 in human plasma for the support of an absolute bioavailability microdose trial.
Beijnen, JH; Lucas, L; Roosendaal, J; Rosing, H; Venekamp, N, 2020
)
0.56
"The aim of this study was to ascertain whether the absolute bioavailability of oral imatinib (Glivec®) during steady state plasma pharmacokinetics in cancer patients could be determined through a concomitant intravenous administration of a single 100 μg microdose of deuterium labeled imatinib (imatinib-d8)."( Determination of the absolute bioavailability of oral imatinib using a stable isotopically labeled intravenous imatinib-d8 microdose.
Beijnen, JH; Groenland, SL; Huitema, ADR; Lucas, L; Nuijen, B; Roosendaal, J; Rosing, H; Steeghs, N; Venekamp, N, 2020
)
0.56
" The absolute bioavailability was calculated by comparing the dose-normalized exposure with unlabeled and stable isotopically labeled imatinib in plasma."( Determination of the absolute bioavailability of oral imatinib using a stable isotopically labeled intravenous imatinib-d8 microdose.
Beijnen, JH; Groenland, SL; Huitema, ADR; Lucas, L; Nuijen, B; Roosendaal, J; Rosing, H; Steeghs, N; Venekamp, N, 2020
)
0.56
" The median absolute bioavailability of oral imatinib at steady state was 76% (range 44-106%)."( Determination of the absolute bioavailability of oral imatinib using a stable isotopically labeled intravenous imatinib-d8 microdose.
Beijnen, JH; Groenland, SL; Huitema, ADR; Lucas, L; Nuijen, B; Roosendaal, J; Rosing, H; Steeghs, N; Venekamp, N, 2020
)
0.56
"The absolute bioavailability of imatinib was successfully estimated at steady state plasma pharmacokinetics using the stable isotopically labeled microdose trial design."( Determination of the absolute bioavailability of oral imatinib using a stable isotopically labeled intravenous imatinib-d8 microdose.
Beijnen, JH; Groenland, SL; Huitema, ADR; Lucas, L; Nuijen, B; Roosendaal, J; Rosing, H; Steeghs, N; Venekamp, N, 2020
)
0.56
" Previous reports have ascertained the antiproliferative activity of imatinib mesylate (IMS) against diverse types of carcinomas, but limited bioavailability has also been reported."( Fabrication of Imatinib Mesylate-Loaded Lactoferrin-Modified PEGylated Liquid Crystalline Nanoparticles for Mitochondrial-Dependent Apoptosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Guleria, A; Kumar, P; Kumar, U; Maurya, P; Mishra, N; Nisha, R; Saha, S; Saraf, SA; Singh, P; Singh, S, 2021
)
1.21
" However, the drug has severe side effects, poor brain bioavailability which may hinder effective treatment of Alzheimer's disease."( Development of Imatinib Mesylate-Loaded Liposomes for Nose to Brain Delivery: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation.
Chella, N; Khan, W; Saka, R, 2021
)
0.97
" According to the results of these theoretical studies, it can be said that the bioavailability and bioactivity of these compounds may be high."( Synthesis and biological evaluation of thiosemicarbazone derivatives.
Budak, Y; Ceylan, M; Doğan, M; Gürdere, MB; Koçyiğit, ÜM, 2022
)
0.72
" However, their oral bioavailability differs."( Considering the Oral Bioavailability of Protein Kinase Inhibitors: Essential in Assessing the Extent of Drug-Drug Interaction and Improving Clinical Practice.
Chatelut, E; Le Louedec, F; Puisset, F; Tod, M, 2023
)
0.91

Dosage Studied

Two patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease and NSF were treated with oral imatinib mesylate at a dosage of 400 mg/day. Skin biopsies performed both before and after initial dosing of that patient revealed less fibrosis and less staining for type I procollagen.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"We present here provisional indications for the use of imatinib in CML patients and give details of the dosage regimens we have used and side-effects we have encountered."( The use of imatinib (STI571) in chronic myelod leukemia: some practical considerations.
Apperley, JF; Armstrong, L; Bua, M; Goldman, JM; Marin, D; Marktel, S; Olavarria, E, 2002
)
0.31
" Serious adverse effects requiring dosage decreases and/or therapy termination are edema, hepatotoxicity, and hematologic toxicity."( Imatinib mesylate, the first molecularly targeted gene suppressor.
Pindolia, VK; Zarowitz, BJ, 2002
)
1.76
" We present a CML patient in megakaryoblastic crisis with severe myelofibrosis, who was treated with imatinib at a dosage of 400 mg/day and achieved complete remission together with a marked regression of myelofibrosis after 1 month."( Successful treatment with imatinib mesylate of a CML patient in megakaryoblastic crisis with severe fibrosis.
Hirose, Y; Ito, M; Iwai, M; Kiyoi, H; Naoe, T; Yokozawa, T, 2002
)
0.61
" These cells displayed high levels of immunoreactivity with pSTAT5 probes that could be inhibited uniformly with imatinib mesylate in a dose-response and time-dependent manner."( Immunoreactivity of Stat5 phosphorylated on tyrosine as a cell-based measure of Bcr/Abl kinase activity.
Frisa, PS; Goolsby, CL; Gottlieb, MA; Hedley, DW; Jacobberger, JW; Paniagua, M; Shankey, TV; Smith, BL; Sramkoski, RM; Ye, PP, 2003
)
0.53
" Ph(+)-ANLL patients were infused with HHT over 6-24 hours daily at the doses of 1-2 mg intravenously and Ara-C 30-50 mg daily subcutaneously for 10-14 days; 3 patients with Ph(+)-ALL received HOAP or DOP combination treatment regimens (One cycle consists of HA with the same dosage described above for Ph(+)-ANLL patients for 7 days, daunorubicin at the dose of 40 mg/d intravenously for 3 days, vincristine at the dose of 2 mg/wk for two weeks, and prednisone at the doses of 60-80 mg/d for 14 days)."( [Glivec in combination with HA regimen for treatment of 20 patients with Ph chromosome positive acute leukemia].
Huang, F; Liu, XL; Meng, FY; Song, LL; Xu, B; Zhang, Y; Zheng, WY, 2003
)
0.32
" Treatment was interrupted or dosage reduced in a few patients."( [Relationship between cytopenia and cytogenetic response in imatinib mesylate treated Ph-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase patients].
Chen, S; Huang, X; Jiang, B; Jiang, H; Jiang, Q; Lu, D; Lu, Y, 2003
)
0.56
" Complete hematologic, cytogenetic and molecular responses were attained 5 weeks after readministration of regularly dosed imatinib and two-step nested RT-PCR confirmed molecular remission throughout a 6 month follow-up period."( Durable molecular response to imatinib mesylate following nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem-cell transplantation for persisting myeloid blast crisis in chronic myeloid leukemia.
Brezinschek, R; Linkesch, W; Neumeister, P; Sill, H; Staber, PB, 2003
)
0.61
" The dosage of imatinib is 400 mg/day for CP patients and 600 mg/day for AP and BC patients."( [The early efficacy of imatinib in the treatment of 54 cases of chronic myeloid leukemia].
Lou, FD; Lu, XC, 2003
)
0.32
" In patients with CML in blastic phase, AGP levels could reflect pharmacological resistance to imatinib, suggesting that increased dosage of imatinib or the use of a competitor to drug binding should be recommended to optimize the therapeutic effect of the drug."( Relationship between elevated levels of the alpha 1 acid glycoprotein in chronic myelogenous leukemia in blast crisis and pharmacological resistance to imatinib (Gleevec) in vitro and in vivo.
Bastie, JN; Berthaud, P; Calvo, F; Chomienne, C; Degos, L; Larghero, J; Leguay, T; Madelaine-Chambrin, I; Mahon, FX; Marolleau, JP; Mourah, S; Raffoux, E; Rousselot, P; Taksin, AL, 2003
)
0.32
" Imatinib pharmacokinetics were determined up to 96 h after dosing on day 1 (no induction) and on days 15-18 (during concomitant rifampicin)."( Effect of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics of imatinib mesylate (Gleevec, STI571) in healthy subjects.
Bolton, AE; Capdeville, R; Hubert, M; Keller, U; Krebs-Brown, A; Peng, B; Seiberling, M, 2004
)
0.58
"Once-weekly administration of imatinib allowed imatinib therapy to continue, and this dosing schedule appeared safe."( Overcoming recurrent cutaneous reactions from imatinib using once-weekly dosing.
Nand, S; Tanvetyanon, T, 2003
)
0.32
"In a patient with recurrent cutaneous reactions due to imatinib, a once-weekly dosing schedule was safe, well tolerated, and associated with eventual disappearance of the reaction."( Overcoming recurrent cutaneous reactions from imatinib using once-weekly dosing.
Nand, S; Tanvetyanon, T, 2003
)
0.32
" The recommended daily dosage of 400-600 mg requires simultaneous intake of up to six of the current 100-mg capsules."( Bioequivalence, safety, and tolerability of imatinib tablets compared with capsules.
Capdeville, R; Ho, YY; Hubert, M; Keller, U; Nikolova, Z; Peng, B; Schran, H; Sieberling, M, 2004
)
0.32
" These events showed no clustering by type of dosage form and were of little to no clinical significance."( Bioequivalence, safety, and tolerability of imatinib tablets compared with capsules.
Capdeville, R; Ho, YY; Hubert, M; Keller, U; Nikolova, Z; Peng, B; Schran, H; Sieberling, M, 2004
)
0.32
" To prevent resistance, early diagnosis and prompt treatment with appropriate initial dosing is essential."( Imatinib therapy in chronic myelogenous leukemia: strategies to avoid and overcome resistance.
Hochhaus, A; La Rosée, P, 2004
)
0.32
" A maximum tolerated dosage was not defined."( Imatinib mesylate (STI571) for treatment of children with Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemia: results from a Children's Oncology Group phase 1 study.
Bernstein, M; Blaney, SM; Capdeville, R; Champagne, MA; Krailo, M; Peng, B; Qu, W; Rosamilia, M; Therrien, M; Zoellner, U, 2004
)
1.77
"Studies with imatinib are underway in pediatrics, but whether pediatric dosing schemes will lead to outcomes similar to adults is unknown."( Treatment of CML in pediatric patients: should imatinib mesylate (STI-571, Gleevec) or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant be front-line therapy?
Pulsipher, MA, 2004
)
0.58
" Maintaining dosing of imatinib in the face of isolated sites of disease progression is also important, as other metastatic sites may still be sensitive."( Cerebral relapse of metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor during treatment with imatinib mesylate: case report.
Beshay, V; Chong, G; Goldstein, D; Hughes, B; Waring, P; Yip, D, 2004
)
0.55
" Although 29 of 39 patients required an adjustment of dosing because of grade 3 or 4 adverse events, most of the events were reversible, and 25 of the 29 patients were able to resume therapy."( Efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate for patients in the first chronic phase of chronic myeloid leukemia: results of a Japanese phase II clinical study.
Bessho, M; Chiba, S; Emi, N; Fujimoto, M; Hirai, H; Hirano, M; Jinnai, I; Kawai, Y; Mizoguchi, H; Morishima, Y; Nakao, S; Nishimura, M; Ogura, M; Ohnishi, K; Ohno, R; Shimazaki, C; Taguchi, H; Takahashi, M; Tauchi, T; Urabe, A; Yazaki, F; Yokozawa, T, 2004
)
0.63
" However, hematological toxicity often occurs and requires dosage reduction or discontinuation of imatinib treatment."( [Imatinib mesylate plus G-CSF therapy for chronic myelogenous leukemia in the blastic crisis].
Asaka, M; Dazai, M; Hashino, S; Imamura, M; Izumiyama, K; Kobayashi, S; Kondo, T; Morita, R; Onozawa, M; Ota, S; Sogabe, S, 2004
)
1.23
" dosing for up to 3 weeks with a >100 mg/kg concentration of this agent is well tolerated in rodents, without any hematotoxicity."( A non-ATP-competitive inhibitor of BCR-ABL overrides imatinib resistance.
Baker, SJ; Cosenza, SC; Gumireddy, K; John, P; Kang, AD; Reddy, EP; Reddy, MV; Robell, KA, 2005
)
0.33
" Recent data have also suggested benefit with metronomic scheduling of cytotoxic agents at lower doses at more frequent dosing intervals, in combination with other targeted therapies."( Imatinib mesylate and its potential implications for gynecologic cancers.
Dushkin, H; Schilder, RJ, 2005
)
1.77
" The dosage of sHHT was escalated by adding one day of treatment every two days."( Phase I/II trial of adding semisynthetic homoharringtonine in chronic myeloid leukemia patients who have achieved partial or complete cytogenetic response on imatinib.
Andreasson, C; Apperley, JF; Bua, M; Goldman, JM; Kaeda, JS; Marin, D; Olavarria, E; Saunders, SM, 2005
)
0.33
" drug dosage and selection."( Role of cytochrome P450 activity in the fate of anticancer agents and in drug resistance: focus on tamoxifen, paclitaxel and imatinib metabolism.
Rochat, B, 2005
)
0.33
"The aim of this study was to identify factors predicting initial and late resistance of GI stromal tumor (GIST) patients to imatinib and to document the dose-response relationship in the prognostic subgroups."( Initial and late resistance to imatinib in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors are predicted by different prognostic factors: a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Italian Sarcoma Group-Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Grou
Bertulli, R; Brown, M; Casali, PG; Goldstein, D; Hogendoorn, PC; Hohenberger, P; Judson, IR; Le Cesne, A; Ray-Coquard, I; Schlemmer, M; Sciot, R; Van Glabbeke, M; van Oosterom, AT; Verweij, J, 2005
)
0.33
" Pharmacokinetic studies of imatinib in healthy volunteers and patients with CML, GIST and other cancers show that orally administered imatinib is well absorbed, and has an absolute bioavailability of 98% irrespective of oral dosage form (solution, capsule, tablet) or dosage strength (100 mg, 400 mg)."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of imatinib.
Lloyd, P; Peng, B; Schran, H, 2005
)
0.33
" Due to the low frequency of adverse effects, further evaluation of imatinib is ongoing at a dosage of 10 mg/kg PO q24h."( A phase I clinical trial evaluating imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) in tumor-bearing cats.
Brodsky, E; Lachowicz, JL; Post, GS,
)
0.41
" However, imatinib mesylate was effective independently of the dosing regime."( Pharmacologic differentiation of inflammation and fibrosis in the rat bleomycin model.
Chaudhary, NI; Park, JE; Schnapp, A, 2006
)
0.74
" Finally, we provide genetic evidence in the mouse that E2A gene dosage can influence the development of pre-B cells during the phase of Igkappa gene activation."( E2A and IRF-4/Pip promote chromatin modification and transcription of the immunoglobulin kappa locus in pre-B cells.
Lazorchak, AS; Schlissel, MS; Zhuang, Y, 2006
)
0.33
" However, in all studies imatinib dosage was tapered to 400-600 mg per day."( High-dose imatinib mesylate combined with vincristine and dexamethasone (DIV regimen) as induction therapy in patients with resistant Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoid blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia.
Choufi, B; Dombret, H; Dupriez, B; Huguet, F; Legros, L; Maury, S; Ojeda-Uribe, M; Pigneux, A; Raffoux, E; Rea, D; Recher, C; Reman, O; Rousselot, P; Royer, B; Stéphane, D; Thomas, X; Turlure, P; Vigier, M, 2006
)
0.74
" Daily dosing of imatinib with concurrent administration of cytotoxic chemotherapy (either gemcitabine or doxorubicin) at standard doses was associated with toxicity that was clinically unacceptable."( Selective kinase inhibition with daily imatinib intensifies toxicity of chemotherapy in patients with solid tumours.
Appleman, LJ; Demetri, GD; Desai, J; George, S; Manola, J; Paul Eder, J; Ryan, DP, 2006
)
0.33
" IFN dosage was reduced to 5 MIU, alternate days, in June 2001 and a cytogenetic relapse occurred 3 months later."( Durable molecular complete remission induced by low-dose imatinib plus low-dose interferon alpha in a patient with chronic myelogenous leukaemia.
Hatta, Y; Miura, K; Sawada, U; Takeuchi, J,
)
0.13
" This study introduced a novel approach using intermittent dosage of IM in order to avoid prolonged interruptions in therapy, to allow spontaneous recovery in blood count and, simultaneously, to achieve intermittently therapeutic plasma drug levels."( Intermittent dosage of imatinib mesylate in CML patients with a history of significant hematologic toxicity after standard dosing.
Divoký, V; Egorin, MJ; Faber, E; Holzerová, M; Indrák, K; Jarosová, M; Maresová, I; Nausová, J; Rozmanová, S, 2006
)
0.64
" A series of four resistant K562 sublines was established with different imatinib dosage (200, 400, 600 and 800 nM) and analyzed using microarray technology."( Gene expression signatures associated with the resistance to imatinib.
Chung, YJ; Ha, SA; Kang, HM; Kim, DW; Kim, HK; Kim, JH; Kim, JW; Kim, S; Kim, TM; Lee, YJ; Namkoong, H; Shin, SM, 2006
)
0.33
" The proposed developed HPTLC method can be applied for identification and quantitative determination of imatinib mesylate in bulk drug and dosage forms."( Stability-indicating HPTLC determination of imatinib mesylate in bulk drug and pharmaceutical dosage form.
Musmade, P; Subramanian, G; Vadera, N, 2007
)
0.81
" In this study, we investigated the influence of dosing time on the ability of imatinib to inhibit tumor growth in mice."( Basis for dosing time-dependent change in the anti-tumor effect of imatinib in mice.
Aramaki, H; Furuyama, A; Higuchi, S; Koyanagi, S; Nakagawa, H; Nakamura, M; Ohdo, S; Takiguchi, T, 2006
)
0.33
" However, the synergistic dose-response relationship found for the combination of imatinib and HI was restricted to Bcr-Abl-positive cells."( Hypusination of eukaryotic initiation factor 5A (eIF5A): a novel therapeutic target in BCR-ABL-positive leukemias identified by a proteomics approach.
Balabanov, S; Bokemeyer, C; Brassat, U; Brümmendorf, TH; Copland, M; Gontarewicz, A; Hartmann, U; Hauber, I; Hauber, J; Holyoake, TL; Kammer, W; Kanz, L; Nordheim, A; Priemer, M; Schwarz, G; Wilhelm, T; Ziegler, P, 2007
)
0.34
" Future clinical studies need to focus on how imatinib can be incorporated into chemotherapy more effectively by determining the optimal dosage of imatinib, the optimal combinational schedule, and the role of allogeneic HSCT."( Imatinib combined chemotherapy for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: major challenges in current practice.
Naoe, T; Yanada, M, 2006
)
0.33
" Some patients become resistant or intolerant to imatinib therapy; management strategies to overcome these problems include dosage adjustment, other treatments, or combination therapy with imatinib and other agents."( Imatinib: a review of its use in chronic myeloid leukaemia.
McKeage, K; Moen, MD; Plosker, GL; Siddiqui, MA, 2007
)
0.34
" Therefore, further research on the efficacy of imatinib should be carried out as well as the most effective dosage needs to he worked out."( [Imatinib mesylate in treatment of childhood chronic myeloid leukaemia. Preliminary report].
Jankowska, K; Kurylak, A; Pogorzała, M; Styczyński, J; Wysocki, M,
)
1.04
" Imatinib dosages higher than 400 mg/day (up to 800 mg/day) may improve progression-free survival, with an increase in dosage benefiting some patients who show disease progression at the lower dosage, particularly in those with exon 9 mutation; however, there is also a dose-related increase in imatinib toxicity."( Imatinib: a review of its use in the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours.
Scott, LJ; Siddiqui, MA, 2007
)
0.34
" Twenty-two patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor or chronic myeloid leukemia initially received imatinib 600 mg daily with dosage subsequently toxicity adjusted."( Imatinib disposition and ABCB1 (MDR1, P-glycoprotein) genotype.
Balleine, RL; Clarke, CL; Collins, M; Delforce, SE; Gurney, H; Hoskins, JM; Lynch, K; Mann, GJ; McLachlan, AJ; Rivory, LP; Schran, H; Wilcken, N; Wong, M, 2007
)
0.34
" IM dosage was increased up to 300 mg/day."( PDGFRalpha/FIP1L1-positive chronic eosinophilic leukemia presenting with retro-orbital localization: efficacy of imatinib treatment.
Armentano, A; Bisconte, MG; Gentile, C; Gentile, M; Lucia, E; Martinelli, G; Mazzone, C; Morabito, F; Ottaviani, E; Rondoni, M; Vigna, E, 2008
)
0.35
"In the present report, we address the question if the reduction of standard dosage of imatinib mesylate (IM) in imatinib-intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients with undetectable residual disease may impair their outcome."( Durable responses in chronic myeloid leukemia patients maintained with lower doses of imatinib mesylate after achieving molecular remission.
Carella, AM; Lerma, E, 2007
)
0.79
" Patients taking 600mg or higher dosage of imatinib had more gastrointestinal side effects."( Imatinib mesylate in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia: a local experience.
Bee, PC; Gan, GG; Haris, AR; Teh, A, 2006
)
1.78
" Reinitiation of therapy at the prior effective dose led to molecular remission in all 5 patients, although 2 patients subsequently required increased dosing to maintain remission."( Relapse following discontinuation of imatinib mesylate therapy for FIP1L1/PDGFRA-positive chronic eosinophilic leukemia: implications for optimal dosing.
Dunbar, CE; Fay, MP; Fu, W; Hartsell, M; Klion, AD; Law, MA; Lemery, S; Maric, I; Noel, P; Nutman, TB; Robyn, J; Schmid, L; Talar-Williams, C, 2007
)
0.61
" Various strategies have been tried to overcome the resistance to this drug including using newer combinations, higher dosage of Imatinib and development of newer compounds."( Strategies for overcoming imatinib mesylate resistance in chronic myelogenous leukemia.
Casson, C; Singh, T,
)
0.43
" This suggests that patient-tailored dosing may be more rational than a fixed dose for all."( Measurement of in vivo BCR-ABL kinase inhibition to monitor imatinib-induced target blockade and predict response in chronic myeloid leukemia.
Arthur, C; Filshie, R; Grigg, A; Hughes, T; Leahy, MF; Lynch, K; Saunders, V; To, LB; White, D, 2007
)
0.34
"The addition of intermittently dosed IM to GEM at low to full dose was associated with broad antitumor activity and little increase in toxicity."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) and gemcitabine in patients with refractory solid tumors.
Ali, Y; Egorin, MJ; Gharibo, MM; Gounder, MK; Lagattuta, TF; Lin, Y; Poplin, EA; Rubin, EH; Stein, MN, 2007
)
0.61
" In many cases, imatinib dosage can be briefly halted or lowered while the toxicity is managed."( Targeted chronic myeloid leukemia therapy: seeking a cure.
Fausel, C, 2007
)
0.34
" Subtherapeutic dosing is highly likely to result in the selection of a resistant clone; thus, it is of paramount importance to ensure the imatinib dose is sufficient."( New strategies in controlling drug resistance.
Frame, D, 2007
)
0.34
"New clinical data are beginning to supply us with effective dosing and monitoring parameters for imatinib and dasatinib treatment of CML."( New strategies in controlling drug resistance.
Frame, D, 2007
)
0.34
" We report a case of unresectable duodenal GIST, which we were able to resect with curative intent after down-staging treatment with a dosage of imatinib 400 mg daily for 8 months."( Successful resection of an advanced duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor after down-staging with imatinib: report of a case.
Bergenfeldt, M; Krarup-Hansen, A; Ludvigsen, L; Mahdi, B; Toxvaerd, A, 2007
)
0.34
"We show here that, consistent with our previous in vitro studies, gemcitabine inhibited tumor growth, whereas pemetrexed was ineffective, even at the highest dosage tested."( Imatinib mesylate enhances therapeutic effects of gemcitabine in human malignant mesothelioma xenografts.
Bertino, P; Cilli, M; Favoni, R; Gaudino, G; Mutti, L; Piccardi, F; Porta, C, 2008
)
1.79
"Imatinib therapy for unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is typically initiated at a dosage of 400mg/d."( Optimizing the dose of imatinib for treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumours: lessons from the phase 3 trials.
Patel, S; Zalcberg, JR, 2008
)
0.35
"To develop dosing guidelines and to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of imatinib in patients with liver dysfunction (LD)."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of imatinib mesylate in patients with advanced malignancies and varying degrees of liver dysfunction: a study by the National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group.
Belani, CP; Doroshow, JH; Egorin, MJ; Grem, JL; Hamilton, A; Hayes, MJ; Ivy, SP; LoRusso, PA; Mulkerin, DL; Murgo, AJ; Peng, B; Potter, DM; Ramanathan, RK; Remick, SC; Takimoto, CH, 2008
)
0.62
" Dosing guidelines for patients with moderate and severe LD remain undetermined."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of imatinib mesylate in patients with advanced malignancies and varying degrees of liver dysfunction: a study by the National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group.
Belani, CP; Doroshow, JH; Egorin, MJ; Grem, JL; Hamilton, A; Hayes, MJ; Ivy, SP; LoRusso, PA; Mulkerin, DL; Murgo, AJ; Peng, B; Potter, DM; Ramanathan, RK; Remick, SC; Takimoto, CH, 2008
)
0.62
"This study was undertaken to determine the safety, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacokinetics of imatinib in cancer patients with renal impairment and to develop dosing guidelines for imatinib in such patients."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of imatinib mesylate in patients with advanced malignancies and varying degrees of renal dysfunction: a study by the National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group.
Egorin, MJ; Flick, SM; Fu, P; Gibbons, J; Grem, JL; Ivy, SP; Lagattuta, TF; Lenz, HJ; LoRusso, PA; Mani, S; Mulkerin, DL; Murgo, AJ; Parise, RA; Pavlick, A; Ramanathan, RK; Remick, SC; Reynolds, S; Shibata, S; Takimoto, CH; Wang, Y, 2008
)
0.62
" However, dosage reduction of imatinib may be required to avoid its potential toxicity."( Evaluation of neoadjuvant inhibition of aromatase activity and signal transduction in breast cancer.
Chow, LW; Loo, WT; Toi, M; Yip, AY, 2008
)
0.35
" Imatinib doses up to 1,000 mg/day for 8 consecutive days are well tolerated when combined with standard TMZ dosing for MG patients."( Safety and pharmacokinetics of dose-intensive imatinib mesylate plus temozolomide: phase 1 trial in adults with malignant glioma.
Desjardins, A; Egorin, MJ; Friedman, AH; Friedman, HS; Gururangan, S; Herndon, JE; Lagattuta, TF; McLendon, R; Quinn, JA; Reardon, DA; Rich, JN; Salvado, AJ; Sathornsumetee, S; Vredenburgh, JJ, 2008
)
0.6
" Monitoring the actual BCR-ABL inhibition in nilotinib treated patients using pCRKL as a surrogate is a means to establish effective dosing and to characterize resistance mechanisms against nilotinib."( Phospho-CRKL monitoring for the assessment of BCR-ABL activity in imatinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia or Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients treated with nilotinib.
Binckebanck, A; Debatin, J; Dugan, M; Erben, P; Ernst, T; Härtel, N; Hehlmann, R; Hochhaus, A; Holm-Eriksen, S; Konig, H; La Rosée, P; Mueller, MC; Ottmann, OG; Shou, Y; Wunderle, L, 2008
)
0.35
" Blood samples were drawn prior to dosing and over 24-48 h on days 1 and 8 of the studies."( Population pharmacokinetics of imatinib mesylate and its metabolite in children and young adults.
Barrett, JS; Bernstein, M; Blaney, SM; Bond, M; Champagne, M; Fossler, MJ; Jayaraman, B; Menon-Andersen, D; Mondick, JT; Thompson, PA, 2009
)
0.64
"Current imatinib dosing guidelines in pediatrics is based on the achievement of exposures consistent with doses known to be safe and efficacious in adults."( Population pharmacokinetics of imatinib mesylate and its metabolite in children and young adults.
Barrett, JS; Bernstein, M; Blaney, SM; Bond, M; Champagne, M; Fossler, MJ; Jayaraman, B; Menon-Andersen, D; Mondick, JT; Thompson, PA, 2009
)
0.64
" administration, whereas the AUC after oral dosing was unaltered."( The effect of P-gp (Mdr1a/1b), BCRP (Bcrp1) and P-gp/BCRP inhibitors on the in vivo absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of imatinib.
Beijnen, JH; Buckle, T; Oostendorp, RL; Schellens, JH; van Tellingen, O, 2009
)
0.35
" We retrospectively studied hematologic and immunological parameters in 72 chronic myeloid leukemia and 15 gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients treated with imatinib at standard dosage and in 20 chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated before the introduction of imatinib in clinical practice."( Development of hypogammaglobulinemia in patients treated with imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia or gastrointestinal stromal tumor.
Alfieri, P; Arcari, A; Ferrari, A; Leonardi, G; Longo, G; Luppi, G; Maffei, R; Marasca, R; Martinelli, S; Piacentini, F; Santachiara, R; Torelli, G; Trabacchi, E; Vallisa, D, 2008
)
0.35
"Two patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease and NSF were treated with oral imatinib mesylate at a dosage of 400 mg/day."( Imatinib mesylate treatment of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis.
High, WA; Kay, J, 2008
)
2.02
" Skin biopsies performed both before and after initial dosing of that patient revealed less fibrosis and less staining for type I procollagen after imatinib mesylate treatment, but essentially unchanged tissue gadolinium content."( Imatinib mesylate treatment of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis.
High, WA; Kay, J, 2008
)
1.99
" However, despite its relative tolerability, some patients require a lower dosage or temporary cessation of treatment because of severe adverse events."( Efficacy of low-dose imatinib in chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia patients.
Kimura, F; Kobayashi, A; Kobayashi, S; Motoyoshi, K; Sato, K, 2009
)
0.35
"A patient with recurrent and initially unresectable but non-metastatic DFSP of the scalp received Imatinib over 3 months with increasing dosage from 400 mg/day to 800 mg/day orally."( Remission with Imatinib mesylate treatment in a patient with initially unresectable dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans--a case report.
Aklan, T; Hoeffken, K; Lemm, D; Mentzel, T; Muegge, LO; Schultze-Mosgau, S; Thorwarth, M, 2008
)
0.7
" Fluid restriction and imatinib dosage reduction (to 600 mg/day) restored sodium levels."( Syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone associated with imatinib.
Apostolidis, J; Charitaki, E; Harhalakis, N; Liapis, K; Nikiforakis, E; Panitsas, F, 2008
)
0.35
" Due to her uncontrolled thrombocytosis after 3 years of interferon-alpha treatment, the patient received imatinib at a dosage of 400 mg/day."( Imatinib mesylate resistance in a chronic myeloid leukemia patient with a novel e8a2 BCR-ABL transcript variant.
Chen, SS; Huang, XJ; Jiang, B; Jiang, H; Jiang, Q; Li, JL; Li, LD; Liu, YR; Qin, YZ; Zhang, Y; Zhu, HH, 2008
)
1.79
" Imatinib dosing was escalated to 600 mg/day in 12 patients, then to 800 mg/day in four patients."( Dose escalation of imatinib after failure of standard dose in Korean patients with metastatic or unresectable gastrointestinal stromal tumor.
Chang, HM; Jang, G; Kang, YK; Kim, TW; Lee, H; Lee, JL; Lee, SS; Park, I; Ryu, MH; Sym, SJ, 2009
)
0.35
"The BCR-ABL inhibitor dasatinib achieves clinical remissions in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients using a dosing schedule that achieves potent but transient BCR-ABL inhibition."( Transient potent BCR-ABL inhibition is sufficient to commit chronic myeloid leukemia cells irreversibly to apoptosis.
Balbas, M; Bleickardt, E; Kasap, C; Nicaise, C; Nicoll, JM; Sawyers, CL; Shah, NP; Weier, C, 2008
)
0.35
" Routinely, avoiding single doses lower than 300 mg and continuous daily dosing has been recommended."( Has the time come for induction and maintenance imatinib therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia?
Faber, E, 2009
)
0.35
" In addition, this application also provides evidence to support a change in the label to allow for an escalation of imatinib dosing to 800 mg/day for patients with progressive disease on a lower dose."( Approval summary: imatinib mesylate in the treatment of metastatic and/or unresectable malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Cohen, MH; Farrell, A; Justice, R; Pazdur, R, 2009
)
0.69
" Phase 1 and 2 trials have shown a dose-response effect and high-dose imatinib trials in early CP CML showed better results compared with standard dose."( Results of high-dose imatinib mesylate in intermediate Sokal risk chronic myeloid leukemia patients in early chronic phase: a phase 2 trial of the GIMEMA CML Working Party.
Alimena, G; Amabile, M; Baccarani, M; Breccia, M; Castagnetti, F; Galieni, P; Iacobucci, I; Iuliano, F; Luatti, S; Martinelli, G; Palandri, F; Pane, F; Rege Cambrin, G; Rosti, G; Saglio, G; Soverini, S; Specchia, G; Stagno, F; Testoni, N, 2009
)
0.67
" Imatinib was dosed at 400 mg per day for patients not taking enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs; stratum A) and at 500 mg twice-a-day for patients taking EIAEDs (stratum B)."( Phase I pharmacokinetic study of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor vatalanib (PTK787) plus imatinib and hydroxyurea for malignant glioma.
Beumer, JH; Desjardins, A; Egorin, MJ; Friedman, HS; Gururangan, S; Herndon, JE; Lagattuta, TF; Reardon, DA; Salvado, AJ; Vredenburgh, JJ, 2009
)
0.35
" Recent clinical trial developments raise questions regarding the proper dosage and schedule of these newer agents as well as the timing of their use in the treatment of patients with CML."( Efficacy of various doses and schedules of second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Bixby, DL; Talpaz, M, 2008
)
0.35
"To assess the antitumour activity, safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of continuous daily sunitinib dosing in patients with imatinib-resistant/intolerant gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) and to assess morning dosing versus evening dosing."( Clinical evaluation of continuous daily dosing of sunitinib malate in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after imatinib failure.
Blay, JY; Casali, PG; Cohen, DP; Demetri, GD; Deprimo, SE; George, S; Harmon, CS; Law, CN; Le Cesne, A; Morgan, JA; Ray-Coquard, I; Stephenson, P; Tassell, V, 2009
)
0.35
"In this open-label phase II study, patients were randomised to receive morning or evening dosing of sunitinib 37."( Clinical evaluation of continuous daily dosing of sunitinib malate in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after imatinib failure.
Blay, JY; Casali, PG; Cohen, DP; Demetri, GD; Deprimo, SE; George, S; Harmon, CS; Law, CN; Le Cesne, A; Morgan, JA; Ray-Coquard, I; Stephenson, P; Tassell, V, 2009
)
0.35
"Sixty of 61 planned patients received treatment (30 per dosing group); 26 completed the study."( Clinical evaluation of continuous daily dosing of sunitinib malate in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after imatinib failure.
Blay, JY; Casali, PG; Cohen, DP; Demetri, GD; Deprimo, SE; George, S; Harmon, CS; Law, CN; Le Cesne, A; Morgan, JA; Ray-Coquard, I; Stephenson, P; Tassell, V, 2009
)
0.35
"For patients with imatinib-resistant/intolerant GIST, continuous daily sunitinib dosing appears to be an active alternative dosing strategy with acceptable safety."( Clinical evaluation of continuous daily dosing of sunitinib malate in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after imatinib failure.
Blay, JY; Casali, PG; Cohen, DP; Demetri, GD; Deprimo, SE; George, S; Harmon, CS; Law, CN; Le Cesne, A; Morgan, JA; Ray-Coquard, I; Stephenson, P; Tassell, V, 2009
)
0.35
"To discuss the new dasatinib dosing regimen for the treatment of chronic phase chronic myelogenous leukemia (CP CML) in patients who failed or were intolerant to imatinib therapy."( Once-daily dasatinib for treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Tyler, T, 2009
)
0.35
" Dasatinib was approved for the treatment of imatinib-resistant/intolerant patients with CML or Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia at the dosage of 70 mg twice daily."( Once-daily dasatinib for treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Tyler, T, 2009
)
0.35
" Continuous and adequate dosing is essential for optimal outcomes and with imatinib treatment possibly being lifelong, patient adherence is critical."( Prevalence, determinants, and outcomes of nonadherence to imatinib therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: the ADAGIO study.
Abraham, I; Albrecht, T; Berneman, Z; De Bock, R; De Geest, S; MacDonald, K; Martiat, P; Mineur, P; Noens, L; Van Eygen, K; van Lierde, MA; Verhoef, G; Zachée, P, 2009
)
0.35
" However, the development of molecular targeted therapies with highly specific mechanisms of action has raised questions about the paradigm of dosing at the MTD."( Maximum tolerated dose: clinical endpoint for a bygone era?
Takimoto, CH, 2009
)
0.35
" However, plasma exposure to the drug from a given dosing regimen can vary widely among patients."( Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic correlation and blood-level testing in imatinib therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia.
Cortes, JE; Egorin, MJ; Guilhot, F; Mahon, FX; Molimard, M, 2009
)
0.35
" We found that STI571 had synergistic effects with cisplatin in BT-549 and to some extent in MDA-MB-468 cells; synergized with camptothecin using an alternate dosing regimen in MDA-MB-231 cells; and STI571 synergistically sensitized MDA-MB-468 cells to paclitaxel and to high doses of 5-fluorouracil."( STI571 sensitizes breast cancer cells to 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin and camptothecin in a cell type-specific manner.
Fiore, LS; Ganguly, S; Holler, CJ; Park, ES; Plattner, R; Sims, JT, 2009
)
0.35
"This study suggests that intentional inhibition of ABCB1 and ABCG2 function at the blood-brain barrier is unlikely to significantly improve clinical outcome of imatinib with currently used dosing regimens."( Influence of the dual ABCB1 and ABCG2 inhibitor tariquidar on the disposition of oral imatinib in mice.
Figg, WD; Gardner, ER; Smith, NF; Sparreboom, A, 2009
)
0.35
" The importance of imatinib dosing and plasma levels is likely due to their impact on intracellular concentrations of the drug."( Clinical strategies to achieve an early and successful response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.
Hochhaus, A; Hughes, T, 2009
)
0.35
" Mean AUCs from time 0 to the end of the dosing interval tau (AUC(0-tau)) were 5076."( Nilotinib for imatinib-resistant or -intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase, accelerated phase, or blast crisis: a single- and multiple-dose, open-label pharmacokinetic study in Chinese patients.
Hu, P; Meng, F; Shen, Z; Wang, J; Wang, Y; Wei, Y; Yin, O; Zhou, L, 2009
)
0.35
" In the elimination phase the concentration of IM (C(t)) follows a mono-exponential decline, and the standardized trough concentration (C(min,std) = C(tau)) can be described by a simple algorithm C(min,std) = C(t)* exp(k(e) x Delta t), where Delta t = t - tau, and tau is 24 hours for qd or 12 hours for bid dosing and k(e) is the elimination rate constant."( A therapeutic drug monitoring algorithm for refining the imatinib trough level obtained at different sampling times.
Chia, YL; Mahon, FX; Molimard, M; Nedelman, J; Schran, H; Wang, Y, 2009
)
0.35
"By using the algorithm, the pharmacokinetic sampling window can be extended to a wider window to make the trough sampling easy to implement in the clinical setting, provided that the sampling time and dosing time are accurately recorded."( A therapeutic drug monitoring algorithm for refining the imatinib trough level obtained at different sampling times.
Chia, YL; Mahon, FX; Molimard, M; Nedelman, J; Schran, H; Wang, Y, 2009
)
0.35
"To establish a recommended sunitinib dosing schedule in Japanese patients with imatinib-resistant/intolerant gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) and to evaluate the efficacy, safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of sunitinib using this schedule."( Phase I/II study of sunitinib malate in Japanese patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor after failure of prior treatment with imatinib mesylate.
Doi, T; Komatsu, Y; Li, Y; Muro, K; Nishida, T; Ohtsu, A; Shirao, K; Ueda, E, 2010
)
0.56
" Discordant responses could be related to drug dosage variations and unknown BCR-ABL independent mechanisms."( BCR-ABL mutational studies for predicting the response of patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia to second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors after imatinib failure.
Chan, YY; Kwan, TK; Lie, AK; Liu, HS; Ma, ES; Sim, JP; Wan, TS; Yeung, YM; Yip, SF, 2009
)
0.35
" The higher imatinib dosing in cohort 5 appears to improve survival by having an impact on the outcome of children with a higher burden of minimal residual disease after induction."( Improved early event-free survival with imatinib in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a children's oncology group study.
Aledo, A; Borowitz, MJ; Bowman, WP; Burden, L; Camitta, B; Carroll, A; Carroll, WL; Davies, SM; Devidas, M; Gaynon, PS; Heerema, NA; Hunger, SP; Jorstad, D; Rutledge, R; Sather, H; Schultz, KR; Slayton, WB; Trigg, M; Wang, C; Winick, N, 2009
)
0.35
" For the minority of patients who are judged to have failed initial treatment with imatinib at standard dosage or increased dosage, the use of second-generation TKI or allogeneic stem cell transplantation must be considered."( Treatment strategies for CML.
Goldman, JM, 2009
)
0.35
" We recommend IM dosing for patients (1) who are not responding to IM as well as expected, (2) who are suspected to be poorly compliant to their IM regimen, (3) who experience adverse events that are unusually severe for the prescribed dosage and (4) when a drug-drug interaction is suspected."( Pharmacologic monitoring and determinants of intracytoplasmic drug levels.
Mahon, FX, 2009
)
0.35
"We report a case of a large gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), which we were able to curatively resect after treatment with a daily dosage of 400 mg imatinib for 3 months."( [Successful resection of an advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor by neoadjuvant chemotherapy with imatinib- a case report].
Kadokawa, Y; Kawabe, A; Nakajima, S; Sonoda, K; Yamamoto, T, 2009
)
0.35
" This is consistent with the results of other observational studies where dose-response was not the primary research objective."( Integrating pharmacogenetics and therapeutic drug monitoring: optimal dosing of imatinib as a case-example.
Craddock, C; Farndon, P; Griffiths, M; Li-Wan-Po, A, 2010
)
0.36
" In patients with chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia, once-daily dosing has similar efficacy with improved safety, compared with twice-daily dosing."( Dasatinib 140 mg once daily versus 70 mg twice daily in patients with Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia who failed imatinib: Results from a phase 3 study.
Brigid Bradley-Garelik, M; Bullorsky, E; Charbonnier, A; Dombret, H; Ehninger, G; Larson, RA; Lilly, MB; Martinelli, G; Müller, MC; Ottmann, OG; Reiffers, JJ; Shah, NP; Zhu, C, 2010
)
0.36
" The mean imatinib dosage administered in the three phases patients did not differ significantly."( [Overview of chronic myelogenous leukemia and its current diagnosis and treatment patterns in 15 hospitals in China.].
Chen, FY; Chen, XQ; Guo, T; Hou, M; Hu, JD; Hu, Y; Huang, HH; Huang, XJ; Ji, CY; Jiang, B; Jiao, L; Li, Y; Liu, T; Liu, TB; Lü, XY; Meng, FY; Qiu, LG; Ren, HY; Song, XM; Sun, AN; Wang, JM; Wang, JX; Wang, SJ; Wu, DP; Xu, D; Yu, L; Zhu, HL, 2009
)
0.35
" In light of the potential role of NK cells in the immunesurveillance of residual leukemia and for future combinatory immunotherapeutic approaches, our data indicate that choice and dosing of the most suitable BCR/ABL-inhibitor for a given patient require careful consideration."( The BCR/ABL-inhibitors imatinib, nilotinib and dasatinib differentially affect NK cell reactivity.
Grünebach, F; Hilpert, J; Krusch, M; Placke, T; Salih, HR; Salih, J; Steinle, A, 2010
)
0.36
" Twice-daily dosing also was evaluated."( Phase 1 study of INNO-406, a dual Abl/Lyn kinase inhibitor, in Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias after imatinib resistance or intolerance.
Cortes, J; Hochhaus, A; Kantarjian, H; Kimura, S; le Coutre, P; Nagler, A; Ottmann, O; Pinilla-Ibarz, J, 2010
)
0.36
" We propose that OA could be used to individualize dosage strategies for patients with CML to maximize molecular response and optimize long-term outcome."( Functional activity of the OCT-1 protein is predictive of long-term outcome in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia treated with imatinib.
Dang, P; Engler, J; Frede, A; Hughes, TP; Manley, PW; Osborn, M; Saunders, VA; White, DL; Zrim, S, 2010
)
0.36
" Imatinib is remarkably effective as treatment for CML in the chronic phase (at a dosage of 400 mg/d) and the accelerated phase (at 600 mg/d)."( Update on practical aspects of the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia with imatinib mesylate.
Schiffer, CA; Zonder, JA, 2006
)
0.56
" A prospective trial is underway to evaluate whether modification of imatinib dose to achieve a target imatinib plasma level will impact patient outcome when compared with standard imatinib dosing (www."( Personalized cancer therapy for gastrointestinal stromal tumor: synergizing tumor genotyping with imatinib plasma levels.
George, S; Marrari, A; Trent, JC, 2010
)
0.36
" Although laboratory and clinical studies had led to the prevailing view that continual inhibition of the BCR-ABL kinase was required for optimal efficacy, recent data on dasatinib have upended this notion and have led to a change in the recommended dosing schedule."( How much and how long: tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia.
Deininger, MW; Traer, E, 2010
)
0.36
" We report a case of unresectable primary GIST of the ampulla of Vater, which we were able to completely resect after treatment with a dosage of imatinib 400 mg daily for 5 months."( [Successful resection of locally advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the ampulla of Vater after treatment with imatinib].
Chang, R; Chang, YW; Cho, KH; Dong, SH; Jang, JY; Kim, BH; Kim, HJ; Park, JE, 2010
)
0.36
" To overcome this problem, future trials concerning best dosage in this subset of patients could be useful."( "Real-life" results of front-line treatment with Imatinib in older patients (≥ 65 years) with newly diagnosed chronic myelogenous leukemia.
Alimena, G; Breccia, M; Cannella, L; Carmosino, I; De Cuia, R; Diverio, D; Frustaci, A; Latagliata, R; Loglisci, G; Mancini, M; Santopietro, M; Stefanizzi, C; Volpicelli, P; Vozella, F, 2010
)
0.36
" Treatment continued without obvious side effects, and PDL dosage was tapered to 10 mg/day."( [Complete response achieved in a case of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor by administration of imatinib mesilate with concurrent relatively high-dose steroid therapy to control side effects].
Kishimoto, H; Nakamura, M; Otagiri, N; Sasahara, K; Tauchi, K; Tsukada, Y; Yoshifuku, S, 2010
)
0.36
" The different dosing requirements of dasatinib (once daily with or without food) and nilotinib (twice daily with fasting) may be an additional factor in selecting frontline agents."( First-line treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia: dasatinib, nilotinib, or imatinib.
Liu, D; Rafiyath, S; Wei, G, 2010
)
0.36
" A prospective trial is underway in order to evaluate whether modification of imatinib dose to achieve a target imatinib plasma level will impact patient outcome when compared to standard imatinib dosing in GIST ( http://www."( The role of imatinib plasma level testing in gastrointestinal stromal tumor.
George, S; Trent, JC, 2011
)
0.37
" On the other hand, imatinib sometimes causes leucopenia and it is hard to maintain a dosage of 400 mg/day."( [Usefulness of low-dose and long-term administration of imatinib in patients with liver metastases of rectal GIST and GIST of stomach].
Hamazoe, R; Hisamitsu, K; Kimura, O; Yamamoto, O; Yamane, N, 2010
)
0.36
" However, it seems that assuming the correct patient's eligibility criteria and proper dosage schedule, possible in combination with chemotherapy, imatinib may become safe and effective treatment modality."( [Expression of c-kit and PDGFR and possibility of tyrosine kinase inhibitor employment in treatment of neuroblastoma in children].
Balwierz, W; Wieczorek, A, 2010
)
0.36
" Twice-daily vatalanib dosing improved tolerability and ease of full-dose administration."( A phase I trial to determine the safety of imatinib in combination with vatalanib in patients with advanced malignancies.
Burris, H; Doss, H; Greco, FA; Hainsworth, J; Infante, J; Jones, S; Spigel, D; Thompson, D, 2011
)
0.37
"To achieve successful therapeutic outcomes in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), continuous and adequate imatinib (Gleevec(®), Glivec(®), Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Basel, Switzerland) dosing is essential."( Patient counseling program to improve the compliance to imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia patients.
Cheong, JW; Jung, CW; Kim, DH; Kim, HJ; Kim, IH; Kim, JS; Kim, SN; Kim, YK; Min, YH; Moon, JH; Park, SY; Sohn, SK; Yoon, SS, 2012
)
0.38
" Knowledge of the ABCG2 421 genotype could be useful when making dosing decisions aimed at achieving the optimal imatinib exposure."( Therapeutic drug monitoring of imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia patients in the chronic phase.
Miura, M; Takahashi, N, 2011
)
0.37
"We tested ex vivo blasts from 42 acute leukemias (14 Philadelphia-negative and 14 Philadelphia-positive B acute lymphoid leukemias, Ph-/Ph+B-ALL; 14 acute myeloid leukemias, AML) for their sensitivity to α-bisabolol in 24-hour dose-response assays."( Pro-apoptotic activity of α-bisabolol in preclinical models of primary human acute leukemia cells.
Bergamini, C; Bonifacio, M; Carcereri de Prati, A; Cavalieri, E; Fato, R; Guardalben, E; Pizzolo, G; Rigo, A; Suzuki, H; Vinante, F, 2011
)
0.37
" The whole kidney of an animal dosed with imatinib was measured at 35 μm spatial resolution."( Mass spectrometry imaging with high resolution in mass and space (HR(2) MSI) for reliable investigation of drug compound distributions on the cellular level.
Guenther, S; Römpp, A; Spengler, B; Takats, Z, 2011
)
0.37
" In addition, it can be applied for the extraction, quantification and clinical assessments of metabolites of Imatinib and other basic pharmaceutical drug molecules in biological fluids or pharmaceutical dosage forms."( A method for quantitative analysis of an anticancer drug in human plasma with CE-ESI-TOF-MS.
Bergquist, J; Elhamili, A, 2011
)
0.37
" No significant difference of imatinib level between blood and bone marrow in IM-treated patients dosed to steady state was observed."( Analysis of imatinib in bone marrow and plasma samples of chronic myeloid leukaemia patients using solid phase extraction LC-ESI-MS.
Elliott, M; Holyoake, T; Iqbal, Z; Jørgensen, H; Watson, DG, 2011
)
0.37
" Most patients achieved planned dosing of 400 mg twice daily and maintained the dose >12 months."( Expanding Nilotinib Access in Clinical Trials (ENACT): an open-label, multicenter study of oral nilotinib in adult patients with imatinib-resistant or imatinib-intolerant Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase.
De Souza, C; Gallagher, N; Jootar, S; le Coutre, P; Nicolini, FE; Powell, BL; Shen, ZX; Szczudlo, T; Turkina, A; Zheng, M, 2012
)
0.38
" Mice were divided into six treatment groups and dosed orally for 15 days as follows: (i) control group, sterile water; (ii) IMA alone; (iii) SUN alone; (iv) IPI-493 alone; (v) IPI-493+IMA; and (vi) IPI-493+SUN."( The Novel HSP90 inhibitor, IPI-493, is highly effective in human gastrostrointestinal stromal tumor xenografts carrying heterogeneous KIT mutations.
Debiec-Rychter, M; Faa, G; Floris, G; Normant, E; Schöffski, P; Sciot, R; Van Looy, T; Wellens, J; Wozniak, A, 2011
)
0.37
" The mean ± SD dosage of imatinib was 445 ± 125 mg/day."( A one-year, phase I/IIa, open-label pilot trial of imatinib mesylate in the treatment of systemic sclerosis-associated active interstitial lung disease.
Abtin, F; Assassi, S; Clements, PJ; Furst, DE; Khanna, D; Maranian, P; Mayes, MD; Saggar, R; Singh, RR, 2011
)
0.62
" Most side effects occurred within the first week of treatment, and even when imatinib was reintroduced at a lower dosage (200 mg daily), it was poorly tolerated."( Imatinib in active diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: Results of a six-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept pilot study at a single center.
de Leon, F; McBain, D; Petrlich, L; Pope, J; Seney, S; Summers, K; Vanderhoek, L; Watson, S, 2011
)
0.37
" Nude mice were grafted with human GIST carrying KIT exon 13 (GIST-882; n = 59) or exon 11 (GIST-PSW; n = 44) mutations and dosed with imatinib (50 mg/kg twice daily), sunitinib (40 mg/kg once daily), IPI-504 (100 mg/kg 3 times per week), IPI-504 + imatinib, or IPI-504 + sunitinib."( The heat shock protein 90 inhibitor IPI-504 induces KIT degradation, tumor shrinkage, and cell proliferation arrest in xenograft models of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Debiec-Rychter, M; Faa, G; Floris, G; Machiels, K; Normant, E; Schöffski, P; Sciot, R; Stefan, C; Vanleeuw, U; Wozniak, A, 2011
)
0.37
" Although imatinib mesylate (IM) is usually ineffective for the treatment of HES/CEL with negative-F/P fusion gene, in the present case it led to the remission of HES/CEL and UC at a higher drug dosage level (400 mg/day)."( Successful treatment of ulcerative colitis associated with hypereosinophilic syndrome/chronic eosinophilic leukemia.
Awano, N; Kitamura, S; Ryu, T; Takazoe, M; Tanaka, M; Yoshimura, N, 2011
)
0.77
" Of 156 total samples from 68 adult CML patients and 127 total samples from 42 adult GIST, only 48 samples from 22 CML patients and 40 samples from 20 GIST patients were trough samples with adequate dosing and collection information."( Use of total and unbound imatinib and metabolite LC-MS/MS assay to understand individual responses in CML and GIST patients.
Armbrust, T; Binder, L; Brandhorst, G; Braulke, F; Cameron, S; Haase, D; Hafke, A; Oellerich, M; Ramadori, G; Streit, F; Walson, P, 2011
)
0.37
"The liquid-chromatography tandem-mass-spectrometry methods developed provided information useful to understand individual responses to therapy even though necessary sampling and dosing information was often not available."( Use of total and unbound imatinib and metabolite LC-MS/MS assay to understand individual responses in CML and GIST patients.
Armbrust, T; Binder, L; Brandhorst, G; Braulke, F; Cameron, S; Haase, D; Hafke, A; Oellerich, M; Ramadori, G; Streit, F; Walson, P, 2011
)
0.37
" We used flow cytometry to analyze the populations and generate high-resolution, nearly continuous Ras dose-response curves."( Quantitative assessment of Ras over-expression via shotgun deployment of vectors utilizing synthetic promoters.
Ferreira, JP; Lawhorn, IE; Peacock, RW; Wang, CL, 2012
)
0.38
" Ultimately, decreasing both the cyclosporine and imatinib dosing was associated with stabilized renal function (serum creatinine 150-186 μmol/L) and cyclosporine concentrations (53-97 μg/L)."( Renal dysfunction in a renal transplant patient treated concurrently with cyclosporine and imatinib.
Egorin, MJ; Mulder, KE; Sawyer, MB, 2012
)
0.38
" Because continuous and adequate dosing is important to achieve this outcome, it is important to understand treatment adherence as part of managing long-term CML therapy."( Adherence to treatment with second-line therapies, dasatinib and nilotinib, in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Cziraky, M; Davis, C; Hamdan, M; Hirji, I; Oliveria, SA; Yood, MU, 2012
)
0.38
" The first set consisted of 241 samples taken 24 ± 2 h after dosing in 54 patients, and the second one consisted of 329 samples taken 24 ± 4 h after imatinib ingestion in 84 patients."( Imatinib trough plasma levels do not correlate with the response to therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in routine clinical setting.
Adam, T; Divoká, M; Faber, E; Friedecký, D; Indrák, K; Jarošová, M; Mičová, K; Rožmanová, S, 2012
)
0.38
" However, high-dose imatinib brought patients more toxic effect and more dosage adjustment for down regulation was made for these patients with severe toxic effect."( Efficacy evaluation of imatinib in the treatment of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Chen, P; Shi, L; Zhao, W; Zong, L, 2011
)
0.37
" Higher dosage (> 600 mg) and smaller body size (< 60 kg) were risk factors for haematological side effects."( An update on imatinib mesylate therapy in chronic myeloid leukaemia patients in a teaching hospital in Malaysia.
Bee, PC; Chin, E; Gan, GG; Haris, AR; Tai, YT; Veera, SN, 2012
)
0.75
" Because imatinib dosage was reduced in many patients due mainly to adverse events, subgroup analysis was performed according to the mean daily dose during the first 24 months of treatment: ≥360 mg (400-mg group; n = 294), 270-359 mg (300-mg group; n = 90) and <270 mg (200-mg group; n = 67)."( Long-term outcome following imatinib therapy for chronic myelogenous leukemia, with assessment of dosage and blood levels: the JALSG CML202 study.
Fujisawa, S; Imai, K; Kiyoi, H; Maeda, Y; Miyamura, K; Miyazaki, Y; Mori, N; Nagai, T; Nakaseko, C; Naoe, T; Ohnishi, K; Ohtake, S; Takeuchi, J; Tauchi, T; Usui, N; Yagasaki, F; Yamazaki, H, 2012
)
0.38
" No definite guidelines currently exist regarding the exact dosing and duration of imatinib therapy for these patients."( Congenital and childhood myeloproliferative disorders with eosinophilia responsive to imatinib.
Abraham, S; Fluchel, M; Hancock, J; Jacobsen, J; Salama, M, 2012
)
0.38
" The method is also suitable for the assay determination of IMM in pharmaceutical dosage forms."( Stability-indicating UPLC method for determination of Imatinib Mesylate and their degradation products in active pharmaceutical ingredient and pharmaceutical dosage forms.
Mukkanti, K; Nageswari, A; Reddy, KV, 2012
)
0.63
" Most of the patients responded to standard dosage of imatinib, and the response was maintained in the time in those patients with a follow-up higher than 9 years."( Incidence and clinical characteristics of myeloproliferative neoplasms displaying a PDGFRB rearrangement.
Arefi, M; de las Heras, N; García, JL; Giraldo, P; Gutiérrez, NC; Hermosín, L; Hernández-Rivas, JM; López-Corral, L; Megido, M; Peñarrubia, MJ; Queizán, JA; Vanegas, RJ, 2012
)
0.38
"5 mg/day continuous daily dose sunitinib dosing schedule appears to be the optimal choice for Chinese patients due to a decreased incidence of adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of sunitinib in Chinese patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Gao, J; Hong, J; Li, J; Shen, L, 2012
)
0.38
" Moreover, daily doses calculated based on refill records may not reflect accurate dosing regimens."( A retrospective analysis of therapy adherence in imatinib resistant or intolerant patients with chronic myeloid leukemia receiving nilotinib or dasatinib in a real-world setting.
Chen, L; Griffin, JD; Guérin, A; Ponce de Leon, D; Wu, EQ, 2012
)
0.38
" However, achieving maximum benefit with these drugs may require optimal dosing and adherence to therapy."( Simultaneous measurement of imatinib, nilotinib and dasatinib in dried blood spot by ultra high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Kralj, E; Kristl, A; Pajič, T; Trontelj, J, 2012
)
0.38
" However, the newer targeted anticancer therapies have different pharmacokinetic (PK) and dosing characteristics compared with traditional cytotoxic drugs, making it possible to estimate the steady-state drug exposure with a single trough-level measurement."( Evidence for therapeutic drug monitoring of targeted anticancer therapies.
Balakrishnar, B; Clements, A; Gao, B; Gurney, H; Wong, M; Yeap, S, 2012
)
0.38
" After 3 months of treatment with a maximum dosage of 400 mg/day sorafenib, there was an improvement in the patient's New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class from IV to III."( Sorafenib is effective in the treatment of pulmonary veno-occlusive disease.
Fukuda, K; Kataoka, M; Satoh, T; Yanagisawa, R; Yoshino, H, 2012
)
0.38
" Sorafenib dosage was reduced in a third of patients, but this did not have an impact on progression-free survival (PFS) (p=0."( Sorafenib as third- or fourth-line treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour and pretreatment including both imatinib and sunitinib, and nilotinib: A retrospective analysis.
Bauer, S; Bitz, U; Blay, JY; Duffaud, F; Gelderblom, H; Joensuu, H; Montemurro, M; Pink, D; Rutkowski, P; Schütte, J; Trent, J, 2013
)
0.39
" Mice were orally dosed over four weeks, grouped as follows: (A) control; (B) GDC-0941; (C) imatinib, and (D) GDC+IMA treatments."( A potent combination of the novel PI3K Inhibitor, GDC-0941, with imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumor xenografts: long-lasting responses after treatment withdrawal.
Debiec-Rychter, M; Deroose, CM; Fletcher, JA; Floris, G; Friedman, L; Li, H; Schöffski, P; Sciot, R; Van Looy, T; Vermaelen, P; Wellens, J; Wozniak, A, 2013
)
0.39
" The patient consequently received imatinib treatment at a dosage of 100 mg daily."( A case of nonleukemic myeloid sarcoma with FIP1L1-PDGFRA rearrangement: an unusual presentation of a rare disease.
Bachanova, V; Begna, KH; Chen, D; Hanson, CA; Ketterling, RP; Viswanatha, DS, 2013
)
0.39
" Therapeutic drug monitoring-guided dosage adjustment seems justified for imatinib, but a formal predictive therapeutic range remains difficult to propose in the absence of prospective target concentration intervention trials."( Systematic review of population pharmacokinetic analyses of imatinib and relationships with treatment outcomes.
Buclin, T; Csajka, C; Gotta, V; Widmer, N, 2013
)
0.39
" After 400 mg/d imatinib treatment failure, sunitinib should be prescribed instead of increased dosage of imatinib."( [Efficacy and safety of sunitinib on patients with imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumor].
Chen, ZF; Chi, P; Guan, GX; Jiang, WZ; Liu, X; Lu, HS, 2013
)
0.39
" However, clinical responses seen in patients treated with the ABL TKI dasatinib despite its much shorter plasma half-life and the apparent rapid restoration of BCR-ABL signaling activity following once-daily dosing suggested acute, potent inhibition of kinase activity may be sufficient to irrevocably commit CML cells to apoptosis."( Threshold levels of ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors retained in chronic myeloid leukemia cells determine their commitment to apoptosis.
Adrian, LT; Agarwal, A; Apgar, J; Deininger, MW; Druker, BJ; Eide, CA; Johnson, KJ; Koop, DR; Latocha, DH; Luo, J; Mackenzie, RJ; Marks, BD; O'Hare, T; Riddle, SM; Tyner, JW; Vogel, KW; You, H; Zabriskie, MS, 2013
)
0.39
" These toxicities seem to be due to a high imatinib plasmatic concentration and are frequently controlled by a discontinuation or a dosage reduction of the drug."( [Imatinib plasma levels in the management of cutaneous side effects induced by imatinib (Glivec®): 2 case reports].
Daghfous, R; El Aïdli, S; Gaïes, E; Klouz, A; Lakhal, M; Sahnoun, R; Sraïri, S; Trabelsi, S,
)
0.13
"Intermittent dosing of dasatinib with a once daily regimen has been shown to reduce side effects while preserving clinical efficacy in early and advanced phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)."( Improved tolerability by a modified intermittent treatment schedule of dasatinib for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia resistant or intolerant to imatinib.
Erben, P; Hochhaus, A; Klag, T; La Rosée, P; Leitner, A; Martiat, P; Müller, MC; Saussele, S; Schenk, T, 2013
)
0.39
" Furthermore, individualisation of dosing based on the directly measured targeted drug delivery could be possible."( Monitoring of imatinib targeted delivery in human leukocytes.
Černelč, P; Kralj, E; Kristl, A; Marc, J; Ostanek, B; Pajič, T; Preložnik Zupan, I; Trontelj, J; Žakelj, S, 2013
)
0.39
"Dasatinib 60 mg/m(2) and 80 mg/m(2) once-daily dosing were selected for phase II studies in children with Ph-positive leukemias."( Dasatinib in children and adolescents with relapsed or refractory leukemia: results of the CA180-018 phase I dose-escalation study of the Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer Consortium.
Agrawal, S; Baruchel, A; Beverloo, BB; den Boer, ML; Dworzak, M; Kearns, PR; Lancaster, DL; Lehrnbecher, T; Manos, G; Mechinaud, F; Pieters, R; Reinhardt, D; Rizzari, C; Rosenberg, J; Strauss, L; van der Velden, VH; Zwaan, CM, 2013
)
0.39
" Adjusting imatinib dosage by plasma level monitoring may facilitate management of patients who experience intolerable toxicities due to overexposure to the drug."( Imatinib plasma monitoring-guided dose modification for managing imatinib-related toxicities in gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients.
Beck, MY; Kang, YK; Ryoo, BY; Ryu, MH; Yoo, C; Yoon, S, 2013
)
0.39
" We used Hill's equation for in vitro response of Ba/F3 cells transduced with various BCR-ABL mutants to determine IC(50) and the slope of the dose-response curve."( Integrating in vitro sensitivity and dose-response slope is predictive of clinical response to ABL kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia.
Druker, BJ; Eide, CA; O'Hare, T; Shukron, O; Vainstein, V, 2013
)
0.39
" Common concerns include how to best select therapy based upon patient-specific comorbidities, monitoring and interpretation of treatment outcomes, and optimization of dosing when side effects occur."( BCR-ABL inhibitors: updates in the management of patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia.
Bixby, DL; Khan, AM, 2014
)
0.4
" However, clinically relevant dosing of these adenosine triphosphate-mimetic agents in humans leads to inhibition of numerous tyrosine kinases beyond those touted by drug manufacturers and studied in landmark clinical trials."( Off-Target Effects of BCR-ABL and JAK2 Inhibitors.
Fancher, KM; Green, MR; Newton, MD, 2016
)
0.43
"The issue of tailored dosing adjusted according to a range of patient-specific factors other than bodyweight or body surface area is of large and increasing clinical and financial concern."( A new frontier in haematology - combining pharmacokinetic with pharmacodynamic factors to improve choice and dose of drug.
Arpon, DR; Gandhi, MK; Martin, JH, 2014
)
0.4
" Correlative studies in this trial may help to optimise dosing schedules in GIST."( Phase I study of panobinostat and imatinib in patients with treatment-refractory metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Ahrens, M; Bauer, S; Bock, E; Grabellus, F; Grunewald, S; Hilger, RA; Hoiczyk, M; Mühlenberg, T; Nagarajah, J; Pink, D; Pustowka, A; Reichardt, A; Reichardt, P; Scheulen, ME; Schuler, M, 2014
)
0.4
" These results also support using imatinib as a clinical depigmentation agent when dosage being carefully determined."( Inhibitory effects of imatinib mesylate on human epidermal melanocytes.
Cao, W; Fu, H; Hu, Y; Huang, H; Liu, L; Luo, Y; Wang, Y; Wu, K; Xiao, H; Xu, Y; Zhang, L; Zhao, Y, 2014
)
0.72
"Plasma concentrations from a randomized controlled trial consist of 61 patients who received oral imatinib at doses ranged between 300 and 800 mg in various dosing interval, which were quantified using a validated reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic method with UV detection method on different occasions at SS and evaluated using PPK model."( Population pharmacokinetics of imatinib in Iranian patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia.
Alimoghaddam, K; Dinan, NM; Ghavamzadeh, A; Golabchifar, AA; Rezaee, S; Rouini, MR, 2014
)
0.4
" Nonetheless, these observational results strongly suggest that a subgroup of patients could benefit from early dosage optimization assisted by TDM, because of lower imatinib concentrations and lower response rates."( Large-scale imatinib dose-concentration-effect study in CML patients under routine care conditions.
Bouchet, S; Buclin, T; Csajka, C; Decosterd, LA; Gotta, V; Mahon, FX; Molimard, M; Schuld, P; Widmer, N, 2014
)
0.4
" Having calibrated the model against dose-response curves of these drugs acting as single agents on Bcr-Abl-transformed cells in vitro, the model was used to predict effects of the agents in combination."( A pharmacodynamic model of Bcr-Abl signalling in chronic myeloid leukaemia.
Jackson, RC; Radivoyevitch, T, 2014
)
0.4
" The dosage of TKI Imatinib was 400 mg/d for chronic phase, 600 mg/d for accelerated and blast phase respectively."( [Efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitor in treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia patients].
Li, XL; Liu, HY; Liu, T; Lü, SJ; Niu, T; Wu, Y; Zheng, SP; Zhu, HL, 2014
)
0.4
"This study assessed whether a cycle of "routine" therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for imatinib dosage individualization, targeting an imatinib trough plasma concentration (C min) of 1,000 ng/ml (tolerance: 750-1,500 ng/ml), could improve clinical outcomes in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) patients, compared with TDM use only in case of problems ("rescue" TDM)."( Clinical usefulness of therapeutic concentration monitoring for imatinib dosage individualization: results from a randomized controlled trial.
Baerlocher, GM; Benz, R; Buclin, T; Chalandon, Y; Csajka, C; Decosterd, LA; Duchosal, MA; Gotta, V; Gregor, M; Heim, D; Leoncini-Franscini, L; Widmer, N, 2014
)
0.4
" In the "routine TDM" arm, dosage recommendations were correctly adopted in 14 patients (median C min: 895 ng/ml), who had fewer unfavorable events (28 %) than the 13 not receiving the advised dosage (77 %; P = 0."( Clinical usefulness of therapeutic concentration monitoring for imatinib dosage individualization: results from a randomized controlled trial.
Baerlocher, GM; Benz, R; Buclin, T; Chalandon, Y; Csajka, C; Decosterd, LA; Duchosal, MA; Gotta, V; Gregor, M; Heim, D; Leoncini-Franscini, L; Widmer, N, 2014
)
0.4
"This first target concentration intervention trial could not formally demonstrate a benefit of "routine TDM" because of small patient number and surprisingly limited prescriber's adherence to dosage recommendations."( Clinical usefulness of therapeutic concentration monitoring for imatinib dosage individualization: results from a randomized controlled trial.
Baerlocher, GM; Benz, R; Buclin, T; Chalandon, Y; Csajka, C; Decosterd, LA; Duchosal, MA; Gotta, V; Gregor, M; Heim, D; Leoncini-Franscini, L; Widmer, N, 2014
)
0.4
" Animals were dosed orally for two weeks as follows: control group (untreated); imatinib (IMA); PI3Ki (BKM120-buparlisib, BEZ235, or BYL719) or combinations of imatinib with a PI3Ki."( Phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors combined with imatinib in patient-derived xenograft models of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: rationale and efficacy.
Debiec-Rychter, M; Fletcher, JA; Floris, G; Li, H; Manley, PW; Schöffski, P; Sciot, R; Van Looy, T; Vanleeuw, U; Wellens, J; Wozniak, A, 2014
)
0.4
"To investigate whether imatinib dosage correlated with effective plasma levels and clinical characteristics for Japanese patients undergoing long-term (≥2 years) imatinib therapy for GISTs."( Imatinib plasma levels during successful long-term treatment of metastatic-gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Hayashi, K; Hirai, T; Inaba, K; Kanie, H; Nomura, S; Okawaki, M; Orito, E; Sawaki, A; Yamada, T; Yamaguchi, Y; Yamamura, M, 2014
)
0.4
" Imatinib dosage was significantly correlated with history of gastrectomy."( Imatinib plasma levels during successful long-term treatment of metastatic-gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Hayashi, K; Hirai, T; Inaba, K; Kanie, H; Nomura, S; Okawaki, M; Orito, E; Sawaki, A; Yamada, T; Yamaguchi, Y; Yamamura, M, 2014
)
0.4
" Our results suggest that imatinib dosage of 400 mg/day is recommended for a patient with a large BSA (≥1."( Imatinib plasma levels during successful long-term treatment of metastatic-gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Hayashi, K; Hirai, T; Inaba, K; Kanie, H; Nomura, S; Okawaki, M; Orito, E; Sawaki, A; Yamada, T; Yamaguchi, Y; Yamamura, M, 2014
)
0.4
"Via multivariate analysis, the IM dosage divided by the body surface area (BSA) was an important index, presupposing a complete cytogenetic response at 12 months (CCyR12)."( Imatinib Mesylate Dose Adjustment Based on Body Surface Area for CML Chronic Phase Patients Intolerant to Standard Dosage.
Choi, CW; Choi, IK; Kim, BS; Kim, HJ; Lee, SR; Park, Y; Sung, HJ; Yhim, HY, 2015
)
1.86
" Fixed dosing therapeutic regimens fail to respect known interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics of the drug and thus, some patients may not achieve sufficient plasma concentrations."( [Potential clinical benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring of imatinib in oncology].
Demlová, R; Juřica, J; Turjap, M, 2015
)
0.42
" Two dosing schedules were studied: schedule A, in which danusertib was given by 3-hour intravenous infusion daily for 7 consecutive days (days 1-7) in a 14-day cycle, and schedule B, in which the danusertib was given by 3-hour intravenous infusion daily for 14 consecutive days (days 1-14) in a 21-day cycle."( A phase I study of danusertib (PHA-739358) in adult patients with accelerated or blastic phase chronic myeloid leukemia and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia resistant or intolerant to imatinib and/or other second generation c-
Boissel, N; Borthakur, G; Brummendorf, TH; Capolongo, L; Carpinelli, P; Cortes, JE; Davite, C; Dombret, H; Jabbour, E; Kantarjian, H; Mariani, M; Schafhausen, P, 2015
)
0.42
" The most effective dosage of IM and its long-term efficacy in children are not well defined."( Long-term results of high-dose imatinib in children and adolescents with chronic myeloid leukaemia in chronic phase: the Italian experience.
Biondi, A; Burnelli, R; Consarino, C; Diverio, D; Foà, R; Giona, F; Gottardi, E; Iaria, G; Ladogana, S; Locatelli, F; Menna, G; Messina, C; Micalizzi, C; Moleti, ML; Nanni, M; Pession, A; Piciocchi, A; Putti, MC; Saglio, G; Santoro, N; Tucci, F; Varotto, S, 2015
)
0.42
" In TKI therapy for CML patients, therapeutic drug monitoring is a new strategy for dosage optimization to obtain a faster and more effective clinical response."( Therapeutic drug monitoring of imatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Miura, M, 2015
)
0.42
" Animals were exposed to a standard and high imatinib dosage continuously and to the high imatinib dose intermittently."( Impact of long-term exposure to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib on the skeleton of growing rats.
Erben, RG; Gerdes, S; Glauche, I; Hofbauer, LC; Jung, R; Suttorp, M; Tauer, JT, 2015
)
0.42
" The impact of HAART on imatinib may depend on whether it is being initiated or has already been dosed chronically in patients."( Human hepatocyte assessment of imatinib drug-drug interactions - complexities in clinical translation.
Beumer, JH; Christner, SM; Kiesel, BF; Parise, RA; Pillai, VC; Rudek, MA; Venkataramanan, R, 2015
)
0.42
" Similar experimental conditions were used to establish a dose-response curve for the effects of Kit ligand and assess the effects of imatinib (small molecule inhibitor of the Kit receptor)."( Regulation of FOXO3 subcellular localization by Kit ligand in the neonatal mouse ovary.
Aloisio, GM; Baker, MD; Carr, BR; Castrillon, DH; Cuevas, I; Ezzati, MM; Nakada, Y; Pena, CG; Saatcioglu, HD, 2015
)
0.42
" A dose-response curve for Kit ligand treatment showed that maximum effect was seen at 150 ng/mL."( Regulation of FOXO3 subcellular localization by Kit ligand in the neonatal mouse ovary.
Aloisio, GM; Baker, MD; Carr, BR; Castrillon, DH; Cuevas, I; Ezzati, MM; Nakada, Y; Pena, CG; Saatcioglu, HD, 2015
)
0.42
" The objective of this study was to explore an optimal dosing regimen for a TKI, radotinib, to improve its safety profile."( Optimization of radotinib doses for the treatment of Asian patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia based on dose-response relationship analyses.
Cho, DJ; Kim, DW; Kim, SH; Lee, JI; Noh, H; Oh, SJ; Park, HL; Park, MS; Zang, DY, 2016
)
0.43
" The relatively low prevalence rate of adverse reactions may be related to the low dosage of imatinib (400 mg/day) used to treat our patients and may have been affected by pharmacogenetic characteristics of our population."( Cutaneous adverse reactions of imatinib therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: A six-year follow up.
Akin Belli, A; Ayer, M; Barut, SG; Dervis, E, 2016
)
0.43
" In the present article, we report our extensive experience with the management of imatinib therapy in a 'real' population, in particular in very elderly patients, discussing whether the use of personalized imatinib dosage could be a safe and advantageous option, enabling continuous administration, thus ensuring effective treatment."( Successful treatment with personalized dosage of imatinib in elderly patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Altimari, A; Biasco, G; Ceccarelli, C; Di Nunno, V; Di Scioscio, V; Fanti, S; Fiorentino, M; Gatto, L; Gruppioni, E; Nannini, M; Pantaleo, MA; Santini, D; Saponara, M; Tabacchi, E; Zompatori, M, 2016
)
0.43
" Here, we study wild-type mice dosed with dasatinib and find that it causes the transient induction of proliferation of quiescent hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs)."( Dasatinib promotes the activation of quiescent hematopoietic stem cells in mice.
Dagger, SA; Duyvestyn, JM; Langdon, WY; Taylor, SJ, 2016
)
0.43
" Based on measured drug concentrations, the CsA dosage needed to be reduced, on average, by 27 % after initiation of imatinib (p = 0."( A clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interaction between cyclosporine and imatinib.
Andrews, LM; Atiq, F; Broers, AE; Doorduijn, JK; Koch, BC; Van Gelder, T; Versmissen, J, 2016
)
0.43
" Subsequently, we reduced the dosage to one level and regorafenib was continuously administered."( [A case of a gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the rectum effectively treated with continuously-administered regorafenib after failure of imatinib and sunitinib].
Ando, T; Hosokawa, A; Kajiura, S; Nakada, N; Nanjyo, S; Sugiyama, T, 2016
)
0.43
"The combination of onalespib plus imatinib was well tolerated but exhibited limited antitumour activity as dosed in this TKI-resistant GIST patient population."( Dose-escalation study of a second-generation non-ansamycin HSP90 inhibitor, onalespib (AT13387), in combination with imatinib in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour.
Agulnik, M; Corless, CL; Demetri, GD; Heinrich, MC; Keer, H; Lyons, JF; Mahadevan, D; Oganesian, A; Riedel, RF; Trent, J; von Mehren, M; Wagner, AJ; Yule, M, 2016
)
0.43
" Treatment history was subdivided into time periods for which treatment was given at constant dosage (total 483 time periods)."( 'Real-life' study of imatinib therapy in chronic phase-chronic myeloid leukemia: A novel retrospective observational longitudinal analysis.
Calvello, C; Cavigliano, P; Elena, C; Ferretti, V; Merante, S; Orlandi, E; Rocca, B; Zappatore, R, 2017
)
0.46
" Considering the exacerbation of the cancer-related symptoms observed during the rest periods, further exploration of the continuous dosing schedule of regorafenib is warranted in future clinical trials."( Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib in Korean Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor after Failure of Imatinib and Sunitinib: A Multicenter Study Based on the Management Access Program.
Im, SA; Kang, YK; Kim, TY; Lee, SJ; Park, JO; Park, SR; Ryoo, BY; Ryu, MH; Son, MK, 2017
)
0.46
" Further trials addressing the optimal dosage of imatinib and mTORi in kidney transplant recipients are recommended."( Gastrointestinal stromal tumors in kidney transplant recipients: Report of two cases and literature review.
Chan, CK; Chau, KF; Cheng, IK; Cheung, CY; Li, FK; Lo, SH, 2017
)
0.46
"The stability of extemporaneously prepared erlotinib, lapatinib, and imatinib oral liquid dosage forms using two commercially available vehicles when stored at 4 and 25 °C was evaluated."( Stability of extemporaneous erlotinib, lapatinib, and imatinib oral suspensions.
Griffith, N; Kolli, S; Li, Q; Liu, Z; Poi, MJ; Wetz, K, 2016
)
0.43
" Comparing patients exposed to polypharmacy to those without, no difference was observed pertaining to the dosage of imatinib, cytogenetic and molecular responses and hematological and extra-hematological toxicity."( Imatinib and polypharmacy in very old patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: effects on response rate, toxicity and outcome.
Abruzzese, E; Alimena, G; Annunziata, M; Avanzini, P; Binotto, G; Bocchia, M; Bonifacio, M; Breccia, M; Bucelli, C; Calistri, E; Castagnetti, F; Cattaneo, D; Cavazzini, F; Cedrone, M; Celesti, F; Cortelezzi, A; Cortesi, L; Crugnola, M; D'Addosio, AM; Falzetti, F; Fava, C; Ferrero, D; Galimberti, S; Giglio, G; Gozzini, A; Gugliotta, G; Isidori, A; Iurlo, A; Latagliata, R; Luciano, L; Mannucci, PM; Mansueto, G; Mauro, E; Montefusco, E; Nobili, A; Orlandi, EM; Pregno, P; Rege-Cambrin, G; Rossi, AR; Rosti, G; Russo, S; Saglio, G; Scaffidi, L; Sica, S; Sorà, F; Spadea, A; Stagno, F; Storti, S; Tettamanti, M; Tiribelli, M; Vigneri, P, 2016
)
0.43
" The reintroduced imatinib dosage was stepped up every week starting from 10 mg/d and increasing to 25, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200, and 300 mg/d until the target dose of 400 mg/d was achieved."( Slow desensitization of imatinib-induced nonimmediate reactions and dynamic changes of drug-specific CD4
Buranapraditkun, S; Klaewsongkram, J; Mongkolpathumrat, P; Sodsai, P; Thantiworasit, P, 2016
)
0.43
" For these patients, dosage of imatinib should be considered to increase in order to achieve effective plasma concentration."( [A Chinese multi-center study on the significance of monitoring imatinib plasma concentration in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor before and after administration].
Chen, H; Guan, W; Li, F; Li, G; Li, L; Ma, L; Miao, Y; Sun, L; Wang, B; Wang, J; Wang, Y; Xu, H; Xu, J; Xu, W; Xu, Z; Yang, L; Yu, J; Zhang, D; Zhi, X, 2016
)
0.43
" Twenty patients with exon 11 mutation and 1 patient with wide type received imatinib treatment at a dose of 400 mg daily, and 3 patients with exon 9 mutation received the dosage of 600 mg per day."( [Efficacy observation on imatinib reintroduction in gastrointestinal stromal tumor with high recurrence risk after imatinib adjuvant therapy failure].
Dong, Z; Gao, J; Gong, J; Li, J; Li, Y; Shen, L; Wang, X, 2016
)
0.43
" Therefore, while optimal asymptotic dosage might not be the best one at short time scales, our results raise interesting perspectives in terms of strategies for achieving and improving long-term deep response."( Long-term treatment effects in chronic myeloid leukemia.
Bernard, S; Besse, A; Lepoutre, T, 2017
)
0.46
" Imatinib was initiated at a dosage of 200 mg, and after 10 months, the signal of the FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion gene was undetectable in bone marrow sample."( [Clinical and genetic features of a patient with myeloid neoplasm in association with PDGFRA and EVI1 gene rearrangements].
Cen, L; Chao, H; Chen, S; Han, W; He, X; Lu, X; Zhou, M, 2017
)
0.46
"Continuous diphenhydramine infusion can provide promising outcomes following the failure of intermittent antihistamine dosing in patients with severe mast cell activation syndrome."( Continuous diphenhydramine infusion and imatinib for KIT-D816V-negative mast cell activation syndrome: a case report.
Ali, N; Boigon, M; Fidler, C; Ghani, A; Hamid, M; Jafri, SIM; Malik, F, 2017
)
0.46
"9%, 1-resistant GISTs) at a dosage of 100 mg/kg/day without exhibiting apparent toxicity."( Discovery of Potent, Selective Stem Cell Factor Receptor/Platelet Derived Growth Factor Receptor Alpha (c-KIT/PDGFRα) Dual Inhibitor for the Treatment of Imatinib-Resistant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs).
Li, J; Li, X; Lu, Y; Mao, F; Wang, M; Xu, Q; Zheng, X; Zhu, J, 2017
)
0.46
" Poor adherence can impact negatively on clinical outcomes, notably because most of these drugs are given as a standard non-individualized dosage despite marked inter-individual variabilities that can lead to toxic or inefficacious drug concentrations."( Effect of Adherence on Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Relationships of Oral Targeted Anticancer Drugs.
Cardoso, E; Csajka, C; Schneider, MP; Widmer, N, 2018
)
0.48
"Imatinib therapeutic drug monitoring only provides information on dosage adequacy and on short-term adherence; longer-term adherence cannot be assessed."( Women Administered Standard Dose Imatinib for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Have Higher Dose-Adjusted Plasma Imatinib and Norimatinib Concentrations Than Men.
Belsey, SL; Bisquera, A; De Lavallade, H; Flanagan, RJ; Ho, A; Ireland, R; Kizilors, A; Lang, K; Mufti, GJ, 2017
)
0.46
" Most patients commenced sunitinib in a 6-week cycle, however, dosing could be reduced, delayed, changed to (or initiated with) a continuous schedule."( Treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumours in paediatric and young adult patients with sunitinib: a multicentre case series.
Benson, C; Chou, AJ; Magnan, H; Rutkowski, P, 2017
)
0.46
"The tyrosine kinase inhibitors sorafenib and imatinib are important in the treatment of a range of cancers but adverse effects in some patients necessitate dosage modifications."( Differential effects of hepatic cirrhosis on the intrinsic clearances of sorafenib and imatinib by CYPs in human liver.
Edwards, RJ; Ghassabian, S; Gillani, TB; Murray, M; Rawling, T, 2018
)
0.48
"A total of 54 patients were divided into two groups according to the dosage of nilotinib."( [Correlation of Serum Concentration of Nilotinib with Clinical Efficacy in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia].
Chen, XC; Gu, CH; Li, CX; Wang, P; Wang, T; Wu, DP; Yang, D; Zou, Q, 2018
)
0.48
" The Cmins of nilotinib relate with the dosage and grade III-IV of adverse events."( [Correlation of Serum Concentration of Nilotinib with Clinical Efficacy in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia].
Chen, XC; Gu, CH; Li, CX; Wang, P; Wang, T; Wu, DP; Yang, D; Zou, Q, 2018
)
0.48
" A phase I study determined suitable dosing for children with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) leukemias."( Dasatinib in Pediatric Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase: Results From a Phase II Trial.
Bertrand, Y; Cardos, RC; Chung, NG; de Martino, ML; De Souza, CA; Fagioli, F; Gore, L; Hijiya, N; Kearns, PR; Lancaster, D; Landman-Parker, J; Place, AE; Rabin, KR; Sacchi, M; Saikia, T; Seo, JJ; Stork, LC; Swanink, R; Zwaan, CM, 2018
)
0.48
" A standard 3 + 3 dosing schema was utilized to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D)."( A phase Ib study of BGJ398, a pan-FGFR kinase inhibitor in combination with imatinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor.
Antonescu, CR; Chi, P; D'Angelo, SP; DeMatteo, RP; Dickson, MA; Francis, JH; Gounder, MM; Heinemann, MH; Hwang, S; Kelly, CM; Keohan, ML; Mcfadyen, C; Qin, LX; Shoushtari, AN; Singer, S; Sjoberg, A; Tap, WD, 2019
)
0.51
"We analyzed clinical, pathological, and molecular characteristics and long-term outcomes in patients with metastatic GIST treated with continuous daily dosing of frontline imatinib in a cohort of patients benefiting for ≥5 years."( Clinicopathological and Molecular Characterization of Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors with Prolonged Benefit to Frontline Imatinib.
Arribas, J; Carles, J; Díaz-Beveridge, R; Durán, J; Estival, A; García-Del-Muro, X; Hernández-Losa, J; Hindi, N; Jiménez, L; Landolfi, S; Lavernia, J; Manzano, A; Martínez-Marín, V; Pajares, I; Pericay, C; Rubió-Casadevall, J; Safont, MJ; Sebio, A; Serrano, C; Valverde, C; Vicente-Baz, D; Vivancos, A, 2019
)
0.51
" The initial dosage of dasatinib for CML-CP and CML-AP patients were 100 mg once daily and 70 mg twice daily (total = 140 mg/ day), respectively."( Four-year follow-up of patients with imatinib-resistant or intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia receiving dasatinib: efficacy and safety.
Hu, J; Huang, X; Jiang, Q; Jin, J; Li, J; Liu, T; Meng, F; Shen, Z; Wang, J; Wu, D, 2019
)
0.51
" PK of these agents following intravenous and oral dosing were evaluated in C57BL/6 mice, prairie dogs, guinea pigs and Cynomolgus monkeys."( Preclinical pharmacokinetic evaluation to facilitate repurposing of tyrosine kinase inhibitors nilotinib and imatinib as antiviral agents.
Ananthula, HK; Buller, RM; Damon, IK; Desai, PB; Gallardo-Romero, N; Kalman, D; Moir-Savitz, T; Olson, V; Parker, S; Patel, G; Sallans, L; Salzer, JS; Sherwin, CM; Touchette, E; Werner, MH, 2018
)
0.48
"5 h), facilitated multiple dosing PK and safety assessment."( Preclinical pharmacokinetic evaluation to facilitate repurposing of tyrosine kinase inhibitors nilotinib and imatinib as antiviral agents.
Ananthula, HK; Buller, RM; Damon, IK; Desai, PB; Gallardo-Romero, N; Kalman, D; Moir-Savitz, T; Olson, V; Parker, S; Patel, G; Sallans, L; Salzer, JS; Sherwin, CM; Touchette, E; Werner, MH, 2018
)
0.48
"Imatinib has shown to be highly efficacious in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) but continuous dosing and patient adherence is essential treatment success."( Prevalence and determinants of non-adherence to Imatinib in the first 3-months treatment among newly diagnosed Ethiopian's with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Engidawork, E; Gebremedhin, A; Mulu Fentie, A; Tadesse, F, 2019
)
0.51
" Imatinib treatment is feasible in transplant recipients under immunosuppression, although immunosuppressive drugs metabolized by CYP3A4 should be used at a reduced dosage or withdrawn."( Small intestinal perforation due to a huge gastrointestinal stromal tumor in a kidney transplant recipient: a case report and literature review.
Akita, H; Asanuma, H; Hamamoto, Y; Ishida, T; Jinzaki, M; Kameyama, K; Kitaoka, S; Morita, S; Oya, M; Shinoda, K; Takahashi, R; Tamaki, S; Yoshida, T, 2019
)
0.51
"Regorafenib at the standard intermittent dosing schedule proved effective in the GRID trial for refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs)."( Phase II Trial of Continuous Regorafenib Dosing in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors After Failure of Imatinib and Sunitinib.
Beck, MY; Kang, YK; Kim, JJ; Ma, JE; Ryu, MH; Yoo, C, 2019
)
0.51
" With this fixed dosing regimen, only approximately 40% of patients reach adequate plasma levels within the therapeutic index."( Optimizing the dose in patients treated with imatinib as first line treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumours: A cost-effectiveness study.
Desar, IME; Kievit, W; van Erp, NP; Zuidema, S, 2019
)
0.51
"A survival model was created to simulate progression, mortality and treatment costs over a 5-year time horizon, comparing fixed dosing vs TDM-guided dosing."( Optimizing the dose in patients treated with imatinib as first line treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumours: A cost-effectiveness study.
Desar, IME; Kievit, W; van Erp, NP; Zuidema, S, 2019
)
0.51
"08 for fixed dosing vs TDM-guided dosing, respectively."( Optimizing the dose in patients treated with imatinib as first line treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumours: A cost-effectiveness study.
Desar, IME; Kievit, W; van Erp, NP; Zuidema, S, 2019
)
0.51
"Based on the currently available data, this analysis suggests that TDM-guided dosing may be a cost-effective intervention for patients with metastatic/unresectable GIST treated with imatinib which will be improved when imatinib losses its patency."( Optimizing the dose in patients treated with imatinib as first line treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumours: A cost-effectiveness study.
Desar, IME; Kievit, W; van Erp, NP; Zuidema, S, 2019
)
0.51
" However, even when treatment is started at the dosage indicated in the medical package insert, we have experienced many cases in which treatment had to be stopped early owing to the occurrence of serious side effects or an insufficient therapeutic effect."( [Toward Personalized Cancer Therapy with Oral Molecular-targeted Agents].
Arai, Y; Kawasaki, Y; Kikuchi, M; Mano, N; Takasaki, S; Yamaguchi, H, 2019
)
0.51
" A 3+3 dosing schema was utilized to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D)."( Phase I Study of Rapid Alternation of Sunitinib and Regorafenib for the Treatment of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Refractory Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.
Barysauskas, CM; Demetri, GD; Fletcher, JA; George, S; Kuang, Y; Leal, A; Mariño-Enríquez, A; Morgan, JA; Paweletz, CP; Phallen, J; Serrano, C; Triplett, O; Velculescu, VE; Wagner, AJ, 2019
)
0.51
" Six out of 22 patients with CS late chronic anemia received subcutaneous recombinant alpha-erythropoietin (EPO) at the standard dosage of 40,000 IU weekly: all 6 patients achieved an erythroid response."( Incidence of Clinically Significant (≤10 g/dL) Late Anemia in Elderly Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Imatinib.
Alimena, G; Breccia, M; Carmosino, I; Cesini, L; Colafigli, G; De Benedittis, D; De Luca, ML; Diverio, D; Foà, R; Latagliata, R; Loglisci, MG; Mancini, M; Mariggiò, E; Massaro, F; Mohamed, S; Molica, M; Rizzo, L; Scalzulli, E; Scamuffa, MC; Vozella, F, 2019
)
0.51
" In this review, an overview of the current knowledge on TDM guided individualized dosing of imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib for the treatment of solid tumours is presented."( Imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib: From flat-fixed dosing towards a pharmacokinetically guided personalized dose.
Desar, IME; Steeghs, N; van der Graaf, WTA; van Erp, NP; Westerdijk, K, 2020
)
0.56
"To determine whether dasatinib given at a daily dosage of 80 mg/m2 is more effective than imatinib mesylate at a daily dosage of 300 mg/m2 to improve event-free survival of children with Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL in the context of intensive chemotherapy without prophylactic cranial irradiation."( Effect of Dasatinib vs Imatinib in the Treatment of Pediatric Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Cai, J; Chen, X; Cheng, C; Fang, Y; Gao, J; Hu, Q; Hu, S; Jeha, S; Jiang, H; Jin, R; Ju, X; Li, C; Li, CK; Liang, C; Pan, K; Pei, D; Pui, CH; Shen, S; Sun, L; Tang, J; Tian, X; Wang, N; Wu, X; Yang, JJ; Yang, M; Yu, J; Zhai, X; Zhang, H; Zhu, X; Zhu, Y, 2020
)
0.78
"Intensive chemotherapy including dasatinib at a dosage of 80 mg/m2 per day yielded superior results in the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL compared with imatinib mesylate at a dosage of 300 mg/m2 per day and provided excellent control of central nervous system leukemia without the use of prophylactic cranial irradiation."( Effect of Dasatinib vs Imatinib in the Treatment of Pediatric Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Cai, J; Chen, X; Cheng, C; Fang, Y; Gao, J; Hu, Q; Hu, S; Jeha, S; Jiang, H; Jin, R; Ju, X; Li, C; Li, CK; Liang, C; Pan, K; Pei, D; Pui, CH; Shen, S; Sun, L; Tang, J; Tian, X; Wang, N; Wu, X; Yang, JJ; Yang, M; Yu, J; Zhai, X; Zhang, H; Zhu, X; Zhu, Y, 2020
)
0.75
" Tumor development continued to be significantly inhibited after cessation of imatinib dosed at 50 and 100 mg/kg/day."( Early administration of imatinib mesylate reduces plexiform neurofibroma tumor burden with durable results after drug discontinuation in a mouse model of neurofibromatosis type 1.
Armstrong, AE; Bessler, W; Blakeley, JO; Chen, S; Clapp, DW; Ferguson, MJ; Ingram, DA; Jiang, L; Li, X; Rhodes, SD; Robertson, KA; Smith, A; Yang, FC; Yang, X; Yuan, J, 2020
)
0.87
" After the nilotinib dosage was reduced to 400 mg, liver biopsy, also performed in 1996 + 20, revealed hypertrophy of renal small blood vessels and endothelial cells of the hepatic artery and loss of endothelial cells of the renal glomeruli, portal vein, and hepatic sinusoids."( Pathological findings suggesting vascular endothelial damage in multiple organs in chronic myelogenous leukemia patients on long-term tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.
Hasegawa, G; Koda, R; Morita, S; Nagano, O; Seki, Y, 2020
)
0.56
"To achieve optimal clinical outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), it is crucial to maintain sufficient dosing of imatinib."( Systemic Steroid Treatment for Imatinib-Associated Severe Skin Rash in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Phase II Study.
Beck, MY; Kang, YK; Kim, EJ; Lee, MW; Lee, WJ; Park, SR; Ryu, MH, 2020
)
0.56
" It is crucial to maintain sufficient dosing of imatinib to achieve optimal clinical outcomes."( Systemic Steroid Treatment for Imatinib-Associated Severe Skin Rash in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Phase II Study.
Beck, MY; Kang, YK; Kim, EJ; Lee, MW; Lee, WJ; Park, SR; Ryu, MH, 2020
)
0.56
" In the 150 days long-term engraftment model experiment, long intravenous dosing intervals of the NPs (every 4 or 8 days) exhibited much better survival and negligible toxicities as compared to daily oral administration of the inhibitor."( An ultra-long circulating nanoparticle for reviving a highly selective BCR-ABL inhibitor in long-term effective and safe treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia.
Fu, L; Liang, H; Liang, X; Liu, J; Liu, Q; Shi, J; Wang, B; Wang, J; Zou, F, 2020
)
0.56
" In conclusion, although the patient's pemphigus was cleared with a single cycle of rituximab infusions while continuing imatinib therapy, the disease returned after imatinib dose was increased a year later, suggesting a dose-response relationship."( Pemphigus foliaceus in a patient with gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated with adjuvant imatinib mesylate.
Anadkat, MJ; Chen, DY; Lewis, HA; Picus, J; Rosman, IS, 2020
)
0.78
" However, studies on the molecular biological traits of GIST have found that tumors respond differentially to imatinib dosage based on the KIT exon with variation."( Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Genetic Testing and Tailored First-Line Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.
Banerjee, S; Kumar, A; Lopez, N; Murphy, JD; Sicklick, JK; Tang, CM; Yebra, M; Yoon, H; Zhao, B, 2020
)
0.56
"These findings suggest that using genetic testing to match treatment of KIT variations to imatinib dosing is a cost-effective approach compared with empirical imatinib."( Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Genetic Testing and Tailored First-Line Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.
Banerjee, S; Kumar, A; Lopez, N; Murphy, JD; Sicklick, JK; Tang, CM; Yebra, M; Yoon, H; Zhao, B, 2020
)
0.56
" This study suggests the incorporation of these variables in to the imatinib dosing algorithm as predictive biomarkers of response to Imatinib therapy."( Plasma imatinib levels and ABCB1 polymorphism influences early molecular response and failure-free survival in newly diagnosed chronic phase CML patients.
Abraham, A; Anandan, S; Balasubramanian, P; Benjamin, ESB; Devasia, AJ; Fouzia, NA; Ganesan, S; George, B; Janet, NB; Karathedath, S; Korula, A; Kulkarni, UP; Lakshmi, KM; Mathews, V; Mohanan, E; Rajamani, BM; Ramachandran Velayudhan, S; Srivastava, A; Srivastava, VM; Varatharajan, S, 2020
)
0.56
"Imatinib is a protein-tyrosine kinase inhibitor which is currently only commercially available as a tablet dosage form in the strength of 100mg and 400mg."( Design and stability of pediatric oral formulation of imatinib.
Annereau, M; Fleury, T; Gendron, A; Hinterlang, M; Rieutord, A; Schlatter, J; Vrana, A, 2022
)
0.72
"The stability study showed that the imatinib oral solution at a concentration of 30 mg/mL provides an alternative option at the commercial tablet dosage forms for pediatric patients and patients who have difficulties to swallow."( Design and stability of pediatric oral formulation of imatinib.
Annereau, M; Fleury, T; Gendron, A; Hinterlang, M; Rieutord, A; Schlatter, J; Vrana, A, 2022
)
0.72
" Per the trial protocol, 17 (38%) participants in the imatinib group required a temporary modification in drug dosing and six (13%) permanently discontinued imatinib due to adverse events; five (23%) participants in the placebo group had temporary modifications in dosing and none had a permanent discontinuation due to adverse events."( Imatinib therapy for patients with recent-onset type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.
Blanchfield, JL; Bluestone, JA; Bundy, BN; DiMeglio, LA; Felner, EI; Ferrannini, E; Gaglia, JL; Gitelman, SE; Gottlieb, PA; Krischer, JP; Lim, N; Long, SA; Mari, A; Mirmira, RG; Raskin, P; Sanda, S; Tsalikian, E; Wentworth, JM; Willi, SM, 2021
)
0.62
"5 mg of sunitinib (part 2e) continuously in 28-day dosing cycles until disease progression, treatment discontinuation, or withdrawal."( Association of Combination of Conformation-Specific KIT Inhibitors With Clinical Benefit in Patients With Refractory Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Phase 1b/2a Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.
Alcantar, O; Bollag, G; Burton, EA; Carias, H; Chan, K; Chugh, R; Ewing, T; Habets, G; Ibrahim, PN; Inokuchi, K; Lin, J; Marimuthu, A; Matusow, B; Michelson, G; Nespi, M; Patnaik, A; Rezaei, H; Sanftner, L; Severson, PL; Shellooe, R; Shields, AF; Spevak, W; Tap, WD; Tinoco, G; Trent, JC; Tsai, J; Tsang, G; Tsiatis, AC; Wagner, AJ; Wu, G; Zhang, C; Zhang, Y, 2021
)
0.62
" The challenge of understanding the cardiac safety data of ponatinib and the unique dosing schedule based on individual response will be discussed."( How I treat chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia.
Berman, E, 2022
)
0.72
", low dosage bamlanivimab, baricitinib, imatinib, and sotrovimab) are a better choice for treating severe or non-severe COVID-19 patients."( Efficacy and safety of current medications for treating severe and non-severe COVID-19 patients: an updated network meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials.
Chen, J; Cheng, Q; Fang, Z; Jia, Q; Zhao, G, 2021
)
0.62
" These data suggest that RWPs require more precise dosing to achieve CML clinical milestones and to mitigate AEs, but findings should be validated prospectively."( Response to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Real-World Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.
Ahmad, M; Bucci, T; Cass, AS; Crona, DJ; Deal, A; Foster, MC; Kemper, R; Muluneh, B; Sketch, MR; Szeto, AH; Zeidner, JF; Zhu, A, 2022
)
0.72
"Although therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is an important tool in guiding drug dosing for other areas of medicine including infectious diseases, cardiology, psychiatry and transplant medicine, it has not gained wide acceptance in oncology."( Therapeutic drug monitoring in oncology: International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology consensus guidelines for imatinib therapy.
Chatelut, E; Clarke, WA; Fotoohi, AK; Larson, RA; Martin, JH; Mathijssen, RHJ; Salamone, SJ, 2021
)
0.62
" After 7 weeks of treatment with an imatinib dose reduction(200 mg), the dosage was increased and the patient was admitted to the hospital with edema of the face and lower limbs, and pleural and pericardial effusions(grade 2)."( [Long-Term Suppression with Short-Term Dose Reduction of Imatinib for Metastatic Lateral Lymph Nodes after Resection of a Rectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor-A Case Report].
Funahashi, K; Ikeda, Y; Kagami, S; Kaneko, T; Kurihara, A; Mitsuda, A; Miura, Y; Nagashima, Y; Tochigi, N; Ushigome, M; Yoshino, S; Yoshino, Y, 2021
)
0.62
" Imatinib is first-line treatment for unresectable gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) unless they harbor a PDGFRA D842V mutation; it is recommended to escalate imatinib to twice daily dosing for KIT exon 9 mutant tumors."( Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: What Is the Best Sequence of TKIs?
Ahr, K; Senchak, J; von Mehren, M, 2022
)
0.72
" Hence, they should be highly suspicious to early detect these distinct histologic entities, handle these undesired complications and guarantee satisfactory immediate outcomes, avoiding frivolous IM dosage modifications."( Lichenoid drug eruption associated with imatinib mesylate therapy.
Alevizopoulos, N; Alexandris, D; Gakiopoulou, C; Kanellis, G; Marinos, L, 2023
)
1.18
" Therefore, pharmacogenetic-based dosing of imatinib is an attractive proposition."( Role of ADME gene polymorphisms on imatinib disposition: results from a population pharmacokinetic study in chronic myeloid leukaemia.
Gokarn, A; Gota, V; Govalkar, R; Jadhav, S; Khattry, N; Krishnamurthy, MN; Kumar, S; Mehta, P; Patil, A; Punatar, S; Puri, AS; Shriyan, B, 2022
)
0.72
"Our study conclusively proves that genetic polymorphisms in the CYP3A4 and ABC family of transporters do not have any role in the personalized dosing of imatinib in CML."( Role of ADME gene polymorphisms on imatinib disposition: results from a population pharmacokinetic study in chronic myeloid leukaemia.
Gokarn, A; Gota, V; Govalkar, R; Jadhav, S; Khattry, N; Krishnamurthy, MN; Kumar, S; Mehta, P; Patil, A; Punatar, S; Puri, AS; Shriyan, B, 2022
)
0.72
"This patient was initially received imatinib (400 mg) orally once a day, and the dosage was adjusted to 100 mg owing to suffering from grade IV bone marrow suppression."( A rare cause of persistent leukocytosis with massive splenomegaly: Myeloid neoplasm with BCR-PDGFRA rearrangement-Case report and literature review.
Gao, L; Tian, ZG; Weng, LC; Xu, Y, 2022
)
0.72
" Data interpretation carried some caveats: there was a potential for replication of patient-derived data between older and new publications; only predicted protein sequences were presented; the criteria used to record clinical response were not uniform across all publications; and imatinib dosage could vary between different clinical publications."( A literature review and database of how the primary KIT/PDGFRA variant of a gastrointestinal stromal tumour predicts for sensitivity to imatinib.
Andrew, N; Dangoor, A; Garcia-Petit, C; Wong, NACS, 2022
)
0.72
"This study utilised a previously validated a Chinese cancer population and assessed the impact of imatinib virtual-TDM in Chinese and Caucasian cancer populations across a dosing range from 200-800 mg daily."( The Application of Virtual Therapeutic Drug Monitoring to Assess the Pharmacokinetics of Imatinib in a Chinese Cancer Population Group.
Badhan, RKS; Yu, H, 2023
)
0.91
"1% (Caucasian) subjects possessing plasma concentration < 550 ng/mL when dosed at 400 mg daily."( The Application of Virtual Therapeutic Drug Monitoring to Assess the Pharmacokinetics of Imatinib in a Chinese Cancer Population Group.
Badhan, RKS; Yu, H, 2023
)
0.91
", a hyperimmune anti-COVID-19 intravenous immunoglobulin), methylprednisolone, interferon-beta/standard-of-care (SOC), interferon-beta-1b, convalescent plasma, remdesivir, lopinavir/ritonavir, immunoglobulin gamma, high dosage sarilumab (HS), auxora, and imatinib were effective when compared with placebo or SOC group."( Comparative efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions for severe COVID-19 patients: An updated network meta-analysis of 48 randomized controlled trials.
Chen, J; Cheng, Q; Fang, Z; Jia, Q; Zhao, G, 2022
)
0.72
" These results are to some extent in line with ours, although our analyses of dose-response matrices from combinations of asciminib with imatinib, nilotinib or dasatinib, show neither synergy nor antagonism, but suggest additive antiproliferative effects on BCR-ABL-dependent KCL22 cells."( Correspondence on "Synergy and Antagonism between Allosteric and Active-Site Inhibitors of Abl Tyrosine Kinase".
Cowan Jacob, SW; Grzesiek, S; Habazettl, JM; Jahnke, W; Loo, A; Manley, PW; Paladini, J; Wiget, A, 2022
)
0.72
" TKI switches (49 times) and dosing changes (165 times) due to intolerance or insufficient response were frequent."( A multicenter real-world evidence study in the Swiss treatment landscape of chronic myeloid leukemia.
Balabanov, S; Cantoni, N; Kahn, S; Kulenkampff, E; Lambert, JF; Schmidt, A; Seitz, P; Sommavilla, R; Zenhaeusern, R, 2022
)
0.72
" Forty-one patients were enrolled and divided into two groups on the basis of the starting dosage: the standard dosage group (50 mg/day, 21 patients) and the reduced dosage group (37."( Sunitinib therapy for imatinib-resistant and/or intolerant gastrointestinal stromal tumors: comparison of safety and efficacy between standard and reduced dosage regimens.
Hirota, S; Ishikawa, T; Kanda, T; Matsumoto, Y; Saijo, Y; Sasaki, K, 2023
)
0.91
"Three patients (14%) in the standard dosage group and another three (15%) in the reduced dosage group (P = 1."( Sunitinib therapy for imatinib-resistant and/or intolerant gastrointestinal stromal tumors: comparison of safety and efficacy between standard and reduced dosage regimens.
Hirota, S; Ishikawa, T; Kanda, T; Matsumoto, Y; Saijo, Y; Sasaki, K, 2023
)
0.91
"The reduced dosage of 37."( Sunitinib therapy for imatinib-resistant and/or intolerant gastrointestinal stromal tumors: comparison of safety and efficacy between standard and reduced dosage regimens.
Hirota, S; Ishikawa, T; Kanda, T; Matsumoto, Y; Saijo, Y; Sasaki, K, 2023
)
0.91
" The TKI dosing is more flexible than has been described in the registration trials, and dose adjustments can be considered both in the frontline and later-line settings (e."( Management of chronic myeloid leukemia in 2023 - common ground and common sense.
Issa, GC; Jabbour, E; Kantarjian, HM; Lipton, JH; Radich, JP; Sasaki, K; Senapati, J, 2023
)
0.91
" Intermittent dosing of imatinib was suggested to delay outgrow of the imatinib-resistant clones in a preclinical study, and it could potentially reduce the adverse events."( A randomised phase 2 study of continuous or intermittent dosing schedule of imatinib re-challenge in patients with tyrosine kinase inhibitor-refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumours.
Kang, YK; Kim, HD; Ryu, MH; Yoo, C, 2023
)
0.91
"The intermittent dosage did not improve the efficacy outcomes as compared to the continuous dosage, but showed slightly better safety profiles."( A randomised phase 2 study of continuous or intermittent dosing schedule of imatinib re-challenge in patients with tyrosine kinase inhibitor-refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumours.
Kang, YK; Kim, HD; Ryu, MH; Yoo, C, 2023
)
0.91
" Patients receiving sunitinib demonstrated within-cycle variation in self-reported HRQoL, corresponding to the on/off dosing regimen."( Patient-reported outcomes and tolerability in patients receiving ripretinib versus sunitinib after treatment with imatinib in INTRIGUE, a phase 3, open-label study.
Attia, S; Bauer, S; Becker, C; Blay, JY; Boye, K; Chi, P; Druta, M; Gelderblom, H; George, S; Goldstein, D; Harrow, B; Heinrich, MC; Jones, RL; Kang, YK; Le Cesne, A; Razak, AA; Reichmann, W; Ruiz-Soto, R; Rutkowski, P; Sanchez, C; Serrano, C; Sherman, ML; Siontis, BL; Somaiah, N; Steeghs, N; Trent, J; von Mehren, M; Zalcberg, JR, 2023
)
0.91
"Patients receiving ripretinib experienced better HRQoL than patients receiving sunitinib during the dosing period and similar HRQoL to patients who had not received sunitinib for 2 weeks for all QLQ-C30 domains except constipation."( Patient-reported outcomes and tolerability in patients receiving ripretinib versus sunitinib after treatment with imatinib in INTRIGUE, a phase 3, open-label study.
Attia, S; Bauer, S; Becker, C; Blay, JY; Boye, K; Chi, P; Druta, M; Gelderblom, H; George, S; Goldstein, D; Harrow, B; Heinrich, MC; Jones, RL; Kang, YK; Le Cesne, A; Razak, AA; Reichmann, W; Ruiz-Soto, R; Rutkowski, P; Sanchez, C; Serrano, C; Sherman, ML; Siontis, BL; Somaiah, N; Steeghs, N; Trent, J; von Mehren, M; Zalcberg, JR, 2023
)
0.91
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (4)

RoleDescription
antineoplastic agentA substance that inhibits or prevents the proliferation of neoplasms.
apoptosis inducerAny substance that induces the process of apoptosis (programmed cell death) in multi-celled organisms.
tyrosine kinase inhibitorAny protein kinase inhibitor that interferes with the action of tyrosine kinase.
anticoronaviral agentAny antiviral agent which inhibits the activity of coronaviruses.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (1)

ClassDescription
methanesulfonate salt
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Protein Targets (45)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Chain A, MAJOR APURINIC/APYRIMIDINIC ENDONUCLEASEHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.63100.003245.467312,589.2998AID2517
LuciferasePhotinus pyralis (common eastern firefly)Potency12.30180.007215.758889.3584AID1224835
acetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)Potency34.67130.002541.796015,848.9004AID1347398
glp-1 receptor, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency28.18380.01846.806014.1254AID624417
thioredoxin reductaseRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency0.28180.100020.879379.4328AID588453
SMAD family member 2Homo sapiens (human)Potency1.34480.173734.304761.8120AID1346859
SMAD family member 3Homo sapiens (human)Potency1.34480.173734.304761.8120AID1346859
TDP1 proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency21.28890.000811.382244.6684AID686978; AID686979
GLI family zinc finger 3Homo sapiens (human)Potency2.94170.000714.592883.7951AID1259369; AID1259392
AR proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency28.35740.000221.22318,912.5098AID1259243; AID1259247; AID743035; AID743042; AID743054; AID743063
estrogen receptor 2 (ER beta)Homo sapiens (human)Potency21.13170.000657.913322,387.1992AID1259378
nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group I, member 3Homo sapiens (human)Potency13.87550.001022.650876.6163AID1224838; AID1224839; AID1224893
progesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency26.60320.000417.946075.1148AID1346795
cytochrome P450 family 3 subfamily A polypeptide 4Homo sapiens (human)Potency17.37680.01237.983543.2770AID1645841
glucocorticoid receptor [Homo sapiens]Homo sapiens (human)Potency8.21690.000214.376460.0339AID720691; AID720692
retinoic acid nuclear receptor alpha variant 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency4.21630.003041.611522,387.1992AID1159552
retinoid X nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency5.75580.000817.505159.3239AID1159527; AID1159531
estrogen-related nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency18.76020.001530.607315,848.9004AID1224841; AID1224842; AID1224848; AID1224849; AID1259401; AID1259403
farnesoid X nuclear receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency33.48890.375827.485161.6524AID743217
pregnane X nuclear receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency7.72050.005428.02631,258.9301AID1346982; AID1346985
estrogen nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency26.35150.000229.305416,493.5996AID1259244; AID1259248; AID743069; AID743078; AID743079; AID743080; AID743091
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor deltaHomo sapiens (human)Potency33.48890.001024.504861.6448AID743215
IDH1Homo sapiens (human)Potency20.59620.005210.865235.4813AID686970
aryl hydrocarbon receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency17.49330.000723.06741,258.9301AID743085; AID743122
cytochrome P450, family 19, subfamily A, polypeptide 1, isoform CRA_aHomo sapiens (human)Potency26.60320.001723.839378.1014AID743083
thyroid stimulating hormone receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency31.67040.001628.015177.1139AID1259385; AID1259395
parathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptor precursorHomo sapiens (human)Potency22.38723.548119.542744.6684AID743266
thyroid hormone receptor beta isoform 2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency26.10240.000323.4451159.6830AID743065; AID743067
serine/threonine-protein kinase mTOR isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency16.28730.00378.618923.2809AID651784
nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency10.28780.000627.21521,122.0200AID743202; AID743219
DNA polymerase iota isoform a (long)Homo sapiens (human)Potency89.12510.050127.073689.1251AID588590
gemininHomo sapiens (human)Potency1.12200.004611.374133.4983AID624297
Voltage-dependent calcium channel gamma-2 subunitMus musculus (house mouse)Potency26.60320.001557.789015,848.9004AID1259244
Glutamate receptor 2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency26.60320.001551.739315,848.9004AID1259244
Spike glycoproteinSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusPotency21.49560.009610.525035.4813AID1479145; AID1479148
ATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)Potency11.88320.011917.942071.5630AID651632
Ataxin-2Homo sapiens (human)Potency11.88320.011912.222168.7989AID651632
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Tyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.31000.00010.712810.0000AID1876062; AID266584
Mast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.10000.00070.470810.0000AID1342286
Platelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)22.00000.00010.491210.0000AID1342287; AID1342288
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Activation Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Tyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)0.09000.00000.03450.1400AID266585
Mast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)0.94290.10000.52150.9429AID1342294
Breakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)0.09000.00000.03930.1400AID266585
Platelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)0.68020.09000.38510.6802AID1342295
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Other Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
DNA repair protein RAD52 homolog isoform aHomo sapiens (human)AC5018.97000.150012.066235.2100AID652116
Cytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)Km14.40001.93005.90608.7000AID1214004
Cytochrome P450 2C8Homo sapiens (human)Km9.34000.05002.98255.7000AID1214003; AID1214004
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (282)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
response to oxidative stressTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cytosolic calcium ion concentrationTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of ubiquitin-protein transferase activityTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of phospholipase C activityTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
mitotic cell cycleTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
neural tube closureTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
B-1 B cell homeostasisTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein phosphorylationTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
B cell proliferation involved in immune responseTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
transitional one stage B cell differentiationTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
mismatch repairTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
autophagyTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
integrin-mediated signaling pathwayTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
canonical NF-kappaB signal transductionTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
associative learningTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damageTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
post-embryonic developmentTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of autophagyTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of endothelial cell migrationTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylationTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
cerebellum morphogenesisTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell-cell adhesionTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
microspike assemblyTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
actin cytoskeleton organizationTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
actin filament polymerizationTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of endocytosisTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell adhesionTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
neuron differentiationTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
BMP signaling pathwayTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of BMP signaling pathwayTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of axon extensionTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of microtubule polymerizationTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of Cdc42 protein signal transductionTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of type II interferon productionTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of interleukin-2 productionTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of actin cytoskeleton organizationTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of osteoblast proliferationTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
substrate adhesion-dependent cell spreadingTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to oxidative stressTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
response to endoplasmic reticulum stressTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta signaling pathwayTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
protein modification processTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
peptidyl-tyrosine autophosphorylationTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
Fc-gamma receptor signaling pathway involved in phagocytosisTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
neuropilin signaling pathwayTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
signal transduction in response to DNA damageTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic processTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of canonical NF-kappaB signal transductionTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neuron apoptotic processTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
endothelial cell migrationTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of T cell differentiationTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of vasoconstrictionTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of mitotic cell cycleTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of mitotic cell cycleTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IITyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
alpha-beta T cell differentiationTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
protein autophosphorylationTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of fibroblast proliferationTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
spleen developmentTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
thymus developmentTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylationTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
activated T cell proliferationTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
T cell receptor signaling pathwayTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
B cell receptor signaling pathwayTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
neuromuscular process controlling balanceTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of release of sequestered calcium ion into cytosolTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of oxidoreductase activityTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
neuron apoptotic processTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of ubiquitin-protein transferase activityTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
myoblast proliferationTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of stress fiber assemblyTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
establishment of localization in cellTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial depolarizationTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of focal adhesion assemblyTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
Bergmann glial cell differentiationTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle cell proliferationTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
neuroepithelial cell differentiationTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to hydrogen peroxideTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
ERK1 and ERK2 cascadeTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascadeTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascadeTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
DNA conformation changeTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to lipopolysaccharideTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to transforming growth factor beta stimulusTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
response to epinephrineTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of protein serine/threonine kinase activityTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell migration involved in sprouting angiogenesisTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular senescenceTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
cell-cell adhesionTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of dendrite developmentTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of substrate adhesion-dependent cell spreadingTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of long-term synaptic potentiationTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of hematopoietic stem cell differentiationTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of extracellular matrix organizationTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
podocyte apoptotic processTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to dopamineTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of establishment of T cell polarityTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
DN4 thymocyte differentiationTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
protein localization to cytoplasmic microtubule plus-endTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of microtubule bindingTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of actin filament bindingTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of modification of synaptic structureTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of blood vessel branchingTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
activation of protein kinase C activityTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of double-strand break repair via homologous recombinationTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of Wnt signaling pathway, planar cell polarity pathwayTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell motilityTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of endothelial cell apoptotic processTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of T cell migrationTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cellular senescenceTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathwayTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
protein phosphorylationTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
lipid hydroxylationCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
lipid metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
steroid catabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
steroid metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
cholesterol metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
androgen metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
estrogen metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
alkaloid catabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
monoterpenoid metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
calcitriol biosynthetic process from calciolCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic catabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
vitamin D metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
vitamin D catabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
retinol metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
retinoic acid metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
long-chain fatty acid biosynthetic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
aflatoxin metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
oxidative demethylationCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
lipid hydroxylationCytochrome P450 2C8Homo sapiens (human)
organic acid metabolic processCytochrome P450 2C8Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processCytochrome P450 2C8Homo sapiens (human)
steroid metabolic processCytochrome P450 2C8Homo sapiens (human)
estrogen metabolic processCytochrome P450 2C8Homo sapiens (human)
epoxygenase P450 pathwayCytochrome P450 2C8Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic catabolic processCytochrome P450 2C8Homo sapiens (human)
retinol metabolic processCytochrome P450 2C8Homo sapiens (human)
retinoic acid metabolic processCytochrome P450 2C8Homo sapiens (human)
long-chain fatty acid biosynthetic processCytochrome P450 2C8Homo sapiens (human)
icosanoid biosynthetic processCytochrome P450 2C8Homo sapiens (human)
oxidative demethylationCytochrome P450 2C8Homo sapiens (human)
omega-hydroxylase P450 pathwayCytochrome P450 2C8Homo sapiens (human)
ovarian follicle developmentMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
myeloid progenitor cell differentiationMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
lymphoid progenitor cell differentiationMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
immature B cell differentiationMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
mast cell chemotaxisMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of dendritic cell cytokine productionMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
glycosphingolipid metabolic processMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
inflammatory responseMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
signal transductionMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
spermatogenesisMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
spermatid developmentMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
germ cell migrationMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell shapeMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
visual learningMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
male gonad developmentMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of phospholipase C activityMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine-mediated signaling pathwayMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
stem cell population maintenanceMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
lamellipodium assemblyMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
actin cytoskeleton organizationMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
hemopoiesisMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
T cell differentiationMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
erythrocyte differentiationMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
melanocyte differentiationMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of pseudopodium assemblyMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of mast cell cytokine productionMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
somatic stem cell population maintenanceMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
embryonic hemopoiesisMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
ectopic germ cell programmed cell deathMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular signal transductionMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
hematopoietic stem cell migrationMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
megakaryocyte developmentMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
Fc receptor signaling pathwayMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
Kit signaling pathwayMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
erythropoietin-mediated signaling pathwayMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell population proliferationMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT proteinMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of programmed cell deathMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
mast cell degranulationMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of MAPK cascadeMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
pigmentationMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
tongue developmentMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of Notch signaling pathwayMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STATMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
response to cadmium ionMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
protein autophosphorylationMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of long-term neuronal synaptic plasticityMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
digestive tract developmentMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
stem cell differentiationMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
epithelial cell proliferationMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
detection of mechanical stimulus involved in sensory perception of soundMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-binding transcription factor activityMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of developmental processMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B signal transductionMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
cell chemotaxisMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
mast cell differentiationMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
mast cell proliferationMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of mast cell proliferationMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
melanocyte migrationMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
melanocyte adhesionMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of pyloric antrum smooth muscle contractionMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of bile acid metabolic processMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of colon smooth muscle contractionMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of small intestine smooth muscle contractionMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of vascular associated smooth muscle cell differentiationMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of reproductive processMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell migrationMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of MAP kinase activityMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
multicellular organism developmentMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
B cell differentiationMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
hematopoietic progenitor cell differentiationMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cellular extravasationBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
renal system processBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
protein phosphorylationBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
phagocytosisBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
signal transductionBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
small GTPase-mediated signal transductionBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
brain developmentBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
actin cytoskeleton organizationBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
keratinocyte differentiationBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of Rho protein signal transductionBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
inner ear morphogenesisBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of vascular permeabilityBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
neutrophil degranulationBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of neutrophil degranulationBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
focal adhesion assemblyBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
homeostasis of number of cellsBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of inflammatory responseBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of phagocytosisBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
modulation of chemical synaptic transmissionBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
neuromuscular process controlling balanceBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of small GTPase mediated signal transductionBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
definitive hemopoiesisBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of respiratory burstBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of blood vessel remodelingBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular protein transmembrane transportBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to lipopolysaccharideBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
activation of GTPase activityBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
macrophage migrationBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of macrophage migrationBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to reactive oxygen speciesPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
luteinizationPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
in utero embryonic developmentPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cell activationPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
hematopoietic progenitor cell differentiationPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
estrogen metabolic processPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell population proliferationPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of platelet activationPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of phospholipase C activityPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylationPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
signal transduction involved in regulation of gene expressionPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular matrix organizationPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
lung developmentPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
adrenal gland developmentPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell migrationPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
male genitalia developmentPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of actin cytoskeleton organizationPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
Leydig cell differentiationPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
platelet-derived growth factor receptor-alpha signaling pathwayPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell proliferation by VEGF-activated platelet derived growth factor receptor signaling pathwayPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
wound healingPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
odontogenesis of dentin-containing toothPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
protein autophosphorylationPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
platelet-derived growth factor receptor signaling pathwayPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of fibroblast proliferationPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
embryonic digestive tract morphogenesisPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
embryonic cranial skeleton morphogenesisPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
embryonic skeletal system morphogenesisPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of calcium-mediated signalingPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
white fat cell differentiationPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of chemotaxisPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B signal transductionPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cardiac myofibril assemblyPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
roof of mouth developmentPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
face morphogenesisPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cell chemotaxisPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
retina vasculature development in camera-type eyePlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascadePlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
platelet aggregationPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to amino acid stimulusPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
metanephric glomerular capillary formationPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of mesenchymal stem cell differentiationPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor protein tyrosine kinase signaling pathwayPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of kinase activityPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
multicellular organism developmentPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
lipid hydroxylationCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
steroid metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
estrogen metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
alkaloid catabolic processCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic catabolic processCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
retinol metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
retinoic acid metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
aflatoxin metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
oxidative demethylationCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
cell population proliferationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of B cell proliferationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear DNA replicationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
signal transduction in response to DNA damageATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
isotype switchingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA replicationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of isotype switching to IgG isotypesATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
DNA clamp unloadingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of mitotic cell cycle phase transitionATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell cycle G2/M phase transitionATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of receptor internalizationAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of translationAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA metabolic processAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
P-body assemblyAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
stress granule assemblyAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA transportAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (73)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
supercoiled DNA bindingTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
magnesium ion bindingTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
four-way junction DNA bindingTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
bubble DNA bindingTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
phosphotyrosine residue bindingTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
transcription coactivator activityTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
actin monomer bindingTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
nicotinate-nucleotide adenylyltransferase activityTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
protein kinase activityTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
protein tyrosine kinase activityTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
non-membrane spanning protein tyrosine kinase activityTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
protein kinase C bindingTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
kinase activityTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
SH3 domain bindingTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
syntaxin bindingTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
manganese ion bindingTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
neuropilin bindingTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
SH2 domain bindingTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
ephrin receptor bindingTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
actin filament bindingTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
mitogen-activated protein kinase bindingTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
proline-rich region bindingTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
delta-catenin bindingTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
sequence-specific double-stranded DNA bindingTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
monooxygenase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
steroid bindingCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
iron ion bindingCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
steroid hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
retinoic acid 4-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
oxidoreductase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
oxygen bindingCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
heme bindingCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
vitamin D3 25-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
caffeine oxidase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
quinine 3-monooxygenase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
testosterone 6-beta-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
1-alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 23-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
anandamide 8,9 epoxidase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
anandamide 11,12 epoxidase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
anandamide 14,15 epoxidase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
aromatase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
vitamin D 24-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
estrogen 16-alpha-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
estrogen 2-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
1,8-cineole 2-exo-monooxygenase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
monooxygenase activityCytochrome P450 2C8Homo sapiens (human)
iron ion bindingCytochrome P450 2C8Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCytochrome P450 2C8Homo sapiens (human)
arachidonic acid epoxygenase activityCytochrome P450 2C8Homo sapiens (human)
retinoic acid 4-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 2C8Homo sapiens (human)
caffeine oxidase activityCytochrome P450 2C8Homo sapiens (human)
aromatase activityCytochrome P450 2C8Homo sapiens (human)
estrogen 16-alpha-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 2C8Homo sapiens (human)
heme bindingCytochrome P450 2C8Homo sapiens (human)
oxidoreductase activity, acting on paired donors, with incorporation or reduction of molecular oxygen, reduced flavin or flavoprotein as one donor, and incorporation of one atom of oxygenCytochrome P450 2C8Homo sapiens (human)
protease bindingMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
protein tyrosine kinase activityMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine kinase activityMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
stem cell factor receptor activityMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine bindingMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
SH2 domain bindingMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
protein homodimerization activityMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
growth factor bindingMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
protein serine/threonine kinase activityBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
protein tyrosine kinase activityBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
guanyl-nucleotide exchange factor activityBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
GTPase activator activityBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
protein serine kinase activityBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
protein kinase activityPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine kinase activityPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
platelet-derived growth factor alpha-receptor activityPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
vascular endothelial growth factor receptor activityPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
platelet-derived growth factor receptor bindingPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
vascular endothelial growth factor bindingPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
protein homodimerization activityPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complex bindingPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
platelet-derived growth factor bindingPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
monooxygenase activityCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
iron ion bindingCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
retinoic acid 4-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
oxidoreductase activityCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
oxygen bindingCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
heme bindingCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
aromatase activityCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
estrogen 16-alpha-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
testosterone 6-beta-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
DNA clamp unloader activityATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
RNA bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
epidermal growth factor receptor bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (42)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
ruffleTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
actin cytoskeletonTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear bodyTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
dendriteTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
growth coneTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear membraneTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell bodyTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
postsynapseTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneTyrosine-protein kinase ABL1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular membrane-bounded organelleCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneCytochrome P450 2C8Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCytochrome P450 2C8Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular membrane-bounded organelleCytochrome P450 2C8Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCytochrome P450 2C8Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular membrane-bounded organelleCytochrome P450 2C8Homo sapiens (human)
fibrillar centerMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
acrosomal vesicleMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
cell-cell junctionMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
external side of plasma membraneMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic side of plasma membraneMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
receptor complexMast/stem cell growth factor receptor KitHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic densityBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
membraneBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
axonBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
dendritic spineBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
Schaffer collateral - CA1 synapseBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
glutamatergic synapseBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
membraneBreakpoint cluster region proteinHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membranePlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membranePlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
microvillusPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
ciliumPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
external side of plasma membranePlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
membranePlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cell junctionPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
receptor complexPlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membranePlatelet-derived growth factor receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGlutamate receptor 2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular membrane-bounded organelleCytochrome P450 3A5Homo sapiens (human)
virion membraneSpike glycoproteinSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus
Elg1 RFC-like complexATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
trans-Golgi networkAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic stress granuleAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
membraneAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
ribonucleoprotein complexAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic stress granuleAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (221)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1347093qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347104qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347090qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347105qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID651635Viability Counterscreen for Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1347091qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347082qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: LASV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347407qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Pharmaceutical Collection2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1347100qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347103qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1347107qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347099qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347425Rhodamine-PBP qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347096qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347424RapidFire Mass Spectrometry qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347108qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347102qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347083qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: Viability assay - alamar blue signal for LASV Primary Screen2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347098qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347086qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Arenaviruses (LCMV): LCMV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347154Primary screen GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347097qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347095qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347092qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for A673 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347094qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347101qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347089qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347106qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1508630Primary qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome: Secreted ER Calcium Modulated Protein (SERCaMP) assay2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1876064Cytotoxicity against African green monkey Vero E6 cells2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 01-27, Volume: 65, Issue:2
Recent Developments in the Use of Kinase Inhibitors for Management of Viral Infections.
AID1224763Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of CLK3 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID764723Induction of apoptosis in human imatinib mesylate-resistant LAMA-84 cells at 1 uM after 3 hrs using propidium iodide staining by FACS analysis2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Sep-01, Volume: 21, Issue:17
Evaluation of novel aryloxyalkyl derivatives of imidazole and 1,2,4-triazole as heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) inhibitors and their antitumor properties.
AID1426821Cytotoxicity against human K562 cells measured after 72 hrs by MTT assay2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-09, Volume: 60, Issue:3
Total Syntheses and Biological Activities of Vinylamycin Analogues.
AID1875893Antiviral activity against SARS-CoV infected in 2 hrs pretreated African green monkey Vero E6 cells assessed as inhibition of cytopathic effect incubated for 48 hrs by celltitre-glo luminescent assay2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 01-27, Volume: 65, Issue:2
Recent Developments in the Use of Kinase Inhibitors for Management of Viral Infections.
AID1224755Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of CAMK4 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1224797Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of MPSK1 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1680872Inhibition of Abl (unknown origin) at 3.3 uM relative control2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-28, Volume: 62, Issue:6
Development of Gleevec Analogues for Reducing Production of β-Amyloid Peptides through Shifting β-Cleavage of Amyloid Precursor Proteins.
AID1214029Activity of human recombinant CYP2A6 in supersomes assessed as enzyme-mediated drug metabolism measured as parent compound remaining at 0.1 to 1 uM after 30 mins by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID682137TP_TRANSPORTER: increase in Topotecan intracellular accumulation (Topotecan: 1 uM, Imanitib mesylate: 1 uM) in BCRP-expressing SaoS2 cells2004Cancer research, Apr-01, Volume: 64, Issue:7
Imatinib mesylate is a potent inhibitor of the ABCG2 (BCRP) transporter and reverses resistance to topotecan and SN-38 in vitro.
AID1224796Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of LOK produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1680874Inhibition of Abl (unknown origin) at 10 uM relative control2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-28, Volume: 62, Issue:6
Development of Gleevec Analogues for Reducing Production of β-Amyloid Peptides through Shifting β-Cleavage of Amyloid Precursor Proteins.
AID1214027Cmax in chronic myeloid leukemia patient at 400 mg, qd by multiple dose study2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1224748Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of AMPKA2 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID588213Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in non-rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID1224792Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of RIOK2 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1680904Induction of 16 kDa CTF-141 bands in mouse N2a695 cells expressing human APP assessed as at 10 uM incubated for 5 hrs by Western blot analysis2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-28, Volume: 62, Issue:6
Development of Gleevec Analogues for Reducing Production of β-Amyloid Peptides through Shifting β-Cleavage of Amyloid Precursor Proteins.
AID1213996Activity of human recombinant CYP2C8 in supersomes assessed as intrinsic clearance for enzyme-mediated N-desmethylimatinib formation by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1680887Stability in mouse liver microsomes assessed as parent compound remaining level at 1 uM after 1 hrs by HPLC-MS/MS analysis2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-28, Volume: 62, Issue:6
Development of Gleevec Analogues for Reducing Production of β-Amyloid Peptides through Shifting β-Cleavage of Amyloid Precursor Proteins.
AID1680873Inhibition of Abl (unknown origin) at 1 uM relative control2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-28, Volume: 62, Issue:6
Development of Gleevec Analogues for Reducing Production of β-Amyloid Peptides through Shifting β-Cleavage of Amyloid Precursor Proteins.
AID1214036Activity of human recombinant CYP3A4 in supersomes assessed as enzyme-mediated N-desmethylimatinib formation at 0.1 to 1 uM after 60 mins by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1779214Cytotoxicity against Bcr-Abl expressing human KU812 cells assessed as cell growth inhibition measured after 48 hrs by MTT assay2021European journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-05, Volume: 221Discovery of pyrrole derivatives for the treatment of glioblastoma and chronic myeloid leukemia.
AID1680888Stability in human liver microsomes assessed as parent compound remaining level at 10 uM after 0.5 hrs by HPLC-MS/MS analysis2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-28, Volume: 62, Issue:6
Development of Gleevec Analogues for Reducing Production of β-Amyloid Peptides through Shifting β-Cleavage of Amyloid Precursor Proteins.
AID1213985Activity of human recombinant CYP1A2 in supersomes assessed as enzyme-mediated drug metabolism measured as parent compound remaining at 0.1 to 1 uM after 30 mins by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1224773Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of ASK1 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1224757Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of CDK2 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID764731Cytotoxicity against human imatinib mesylate-resistant LAMA-84 cells assessed as reduction of cell survival at 1 uM after 20 mins by ATP-lite1step assay2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Sep-01, Volume: 21, Issue:17
Evaluation of novel aryloxyalkyl derivatives of imidazole and 1,2,4-triazole as heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) inhibitors and their antitumor properties.
AID1213984Activity of human recombinant CYP3A4 in supersomes assessed as enzyme-mediated drug metabolism measured as parent compound remaining at 0.1 to 1 uM after 30 mins by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1680885Stability in human liver microsomes assessed as parent compound remaining level at 10 uM after 1 hrs by HPLC-MS/MS analysis2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-28, Volume: 62, Issue:6
Development of Gleevec Analogues for Reducing Production of β-Amyloid Peptides through Shifting β-Cleavage of Amyloid Precursor Proteins.
AID1213994Activity of human recombinant CYP1A2 in supersomes assessed as intrinsic clearance for enzyme-mediated drug metabolism by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID629494Cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells after 24 hrs by MTT assay2011European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 46, Issue:12
Synthesis and apoptosis inducing ability of new anilino substituted pyrimidine sulfonamides as potential anticancer agents.
AID1224764Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of CK1G1 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1214002Activity of human recombinant CYP3A5 in supersomes assessed as intrinsic clearance for enzyme-mediated metabolite formation by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1224774Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of p38beta produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID680881TP_TRANSPORTER: efflux in MDR1-expressing LLC-PK1 cells2003The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, Nov, Volume: 307, Issue:2
Interaction of imatinib mesilate with human P-glycoprotein.
AID1224795Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of SLK produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1680892Inhibition of beta-secretase in mouse N2a cells expressed in FL-APP assessed as reduction of sAPPalpha levels at 10 uM incubated for 5 hrs by MSD-ELISA relative to control2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-28, Volume: 62, Issue:6
Development of Gleevec Analogues for Reducing Production of β-Amyloid Peptides through Shifting β-Cleavage of Amyloid Precursor Proteins.
AID1213989Activity of human recombinant CYP2C9 in supersomes assessed as enzyme-mediated N-desmethylimatinib formation at 1 uM after 60 mins by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID404304Effect on human MRP2-mediated estradiol-17-beta-glucuronide transport in Sf9 cells inverted membrane vesicles relative to control2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-12, Volume: 51, Issue:11
Prediction and identification of drug interactions with the human ATP-binding cassette transporter multidrug-resistance associated protein 2 (MRP2; ABCC2).
AID1224776Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of ERK3 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1214033Activity of human recombinant CYP2D6 in supersomes assessed as enzyme-mediated drug metabolism measured as parent compound remaining at 0.1 to 1 uM after 30 mins by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1214004Activity of human recombinant CYP3A4 in supersomes after 3 mins by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1214008Fraction unbound in human liver microsomes containing CYP2C8 after 60 mins2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1224805Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of VRK2 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1214006Fraction unbound in human liver microsomes containing CYP1A2 after 60 mins2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1224750Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of CAMK1G produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID360938Inhibition of formation of erythroid burst-forming units in human polycythemia vera cells at 1 uM2007The Journal of biological chemistry, Feb-09, Volume: 282, Issue:6
Erlotinib effectively inhibits JAK2V617F activity and polycythemia vera cell growth.
AID1224777Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of MST4(1) produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1743004Antiproliferative activity against human A549 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 48 hrs by xCELLigence RTCA2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 207Design, synthesis and anti-cancer activity of pyrrole-imidazole polyamides through target-downregulation of c-kit gene expression.
AID1224771Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of MEK2 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1680886Stability in mouse liver microsomes assessed as parent compound remaining level at 10 uM after 1 hrs by HPLC-MS/MS analysis2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-28, Volume: 62, Issue:6
Development of Gleevec Analogues for Reducing Production of β-Amyloid Peptides through Shifting β-Cleavage of Amyloid Precursor Proteins.
AID1680890Stability in mouse liver microsomes assessed as parent compound remaining level at 10 uM after 0.5 hrs by HPLC-MS/MS analysis2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-28, Volume: 62, Issue:6
Development of Gleevec Analogues for Reducing Production of β-Amyloid Peptides through Shifting β-Cleavage of Amyloid Precursor Proteins.
AID1213988Activity of human recombinant CYP2C19 in supersomes assessed as enzyme-mediated N-desmethylimatinib formation at 1 uM after 60 mins by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1213983Activity of human recombinant CYP2C8 in supersomes assessed as enzyme-mediated drug metabolism measured as parent compound remaining at 0.1 to 1 uM after 30 mins by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID360729Inhibition of human JAK2 V617F mutant expressed in COS7 cells2007The Journal of biological chemistry, Feb-09, Volume: 282, Issue:6
Erlotinib effectively inhibits JAK2V617F activity and polycythemia vera cell growth.
AID1214031Activity of human recombinant CYP2C9 in supersomes assessed as enzyme-mediated drug metabolism measured as parent compound remaining at 0.1 to 1 uM after 30 mins by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1214030Activity of human recombinant CYP2B6 in supersomes assessed as enzyme-mediated drug metabolism measured as parent compound remaining at 0.1 to 1 uM after 30 mins by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1224769Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of GSK3B produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1876062Inhibition of c-Abl (unknown origin)2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 01-27, Volume: 65, Issue:2
Recent Developments in the Use of Kinase Inhibitors for Management of Viral Infections.
AID1214009Fraction unbound in human liver microsomes containing CYP2D6 after 60 mins2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1224758Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of CDK6 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1214010Fraction unbound in human liver microsomes containing CYP3A4 after 60 mins2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1213995Activity of human recombinant CYP2B6 in supersomes assessed as intrinsic clearance for enzyme-mediated drug metabolism by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1876063Antiviral activity against MERS-CoV2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 01-27, Volume: 65, Issue:2
Recent Developments in the Use of Kinase Inhibitors for Management of Viral Infections.
AID1224760Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of CHEK2 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1512396Inhibition of BACE1 in mouse N2a695 cells assessed as reduction in Abeta40 production at 10 uM incubated for 6 hrs by ELISA
AID629493Cytotoxicity against human K562 cells after 24 hrs by MTT assay2011European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 46, Issue:12
Synthesis and apoptosis inducing ability of new anilino substituted pyrimidine sulfonamides as potential anticancer agents.
AID1224788Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of PIM3 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1224803Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of PBK produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1359969Inhibition of porcine brain GSK-3alpha/beta using YRRAAVPPSPSLSRHSSPHQSpEDEEE as substrate after 30 mins by ADP-Glo reagent based luminescence assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-25, Volume: 154Structure-based design of novel quinoxaline-2-carboxylic acids and analogues as Pim-1 inhibitors.
AID1224768Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of DMPK1 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1213999Activity of human recombinant CYP3A4 in supersomes assessed as intrinsic clearance for enzyme-mediated N-desmethylimatinib formation by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1214025Elimination half life in chronic myeloid leukemia patient2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1224749Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of CAMK1D produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1224756Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of CAMKK2 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1213992Activity of human recombinant CYP3A4 in supersomes assessed as enzyme-mediated metabolite M5 formation at 1 uM after 60 mins by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1680897Inhibition of beta-secretase in mouse N2a cells expressed in FL-APP assessed as increase in APP alpha-CTF levels at 10 uM incubated for 5 hrs by MSD-ELISA relative to control2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-28, Volume: 62, Issue:6
Development of Gleevec Analogues for Reducing Production of β-Amyloid Peptides through Shifting β-Cleavage of Amyloid Precursor Proteins.
AID1224767Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of DAPK3 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1224782Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of PAK5 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1214034Activity of human recombinant CYP2E1 in supersomes assessed as enzyme-mediated drug metabolism measured as parent compound remaining at 0.1 to 1 uM after 30 mins by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID588211Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in humans2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID1214020Activity of CYP2C8 in human liver microsomes assessed as inhibition of montelukast-mediated N-desmethylimatinib formation at 0.1 uM after 5 mins by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1779215Cytotoxicity against Imatinib mesylate sensitive wild-type human KBM5 cells assessed as cell growth inhibition measured after 48 hrs by MTT assay2021European journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-05, Volume: 221Discovery of pyrrole derivatives for the treatment of glioblastoma and chronic myeloid leukemia.
AID1680891Stability in mouse liver microsomes assessed as parent compound remaining level at 1 uM after 0.5 hrs by HPLC-MS/MS analysis2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-28, Volume: 62, Issue:6
Development of Gleevec Analogues for Reducing Production of β-Amyloid Peptides through Shifting β-Cleavage of Amyloid Precursor Proteins.
AID1213986Activity of human recombinant CYP3A5 in supersomes assessed as enzyme-mediated N-desmethylimatinib formation at 0.1 to 1 uM after 60 mins by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1224765Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of CK1G2 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1680901Inhibition of gamma secretase in mouse N2a cells expressing APP-C99 assessed as reduction of A-beta levels at 10 uM incubated for 5 hrs by MSD-ELISA2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-28, Volume: 62, Issue:6
Development of Gleevec Analogues for Reducing Production of β-Amyloid Peptides through Shifting β-Cleavage of Amyloid Precursor Proteins.
AID680974TP_TRANSPORTER: uptake in BCRP-expressing HEK cells2004Blood, Nov-01, Volume: 104, Issue:9
Imatinib mesylate (STI571) is a substrate for the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP)/ABCG2 drug pump.
AID1224793Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of RSK2a produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1214035Activity of human recombinant CYP2C8 in supersomes assessed as enzyme-mediated N-desmethylimatinib formation at 0.1 to 1 uM after 60 mins by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1359964Inhibition of human CDK2/CyclinA using histone H1 as substrate after 30 mins by ADP-Glo reagent based luminescence assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-25, Volume: 154Structure-based design of novel quinoxaline-2-carboxylic acids and analogues as Pim-1 inhibitors.
AID629497Cell cycle arrest in human K562 cells assessed as accumulation at G1 phase at 10 uM after 24 hrs by propidium iodide staining-based FACS analysis (Rvb = 74.25 +/- 1.511 %)2011European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 46, Issue:12
Synthesis and apoptosis inducing ability of new anilino substituted pyrimidine sulfonamides as potential anticancer agents.
AID1359968Inhibition of porcine brain CK1delta/epsilon using RRKHAAIGSpAYSITA as substrate after 30 mins by ADP-Glo reagent based luminescence assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-25, Volume: 154Structure-based design of novel quinoxaline-2-carboxylic acids and analogues as Pim-1 inhibitors.
AID1224761Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of CLK1 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1224780Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of OSR1 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1213991Activity of human recombinant CYP2D6 in supersomes assessed as enzyme-mediated metabolite M5 formation at 1 uM after 60 mins by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1359965Inhibition of recombinant human CDK9/CyclinT expressed in baculovirus infected Sf9 insect cells using YSPTSPSYSPTSPSYSPTSPSKKKK as substrate after 30 mins by ADP-Glo reagent based luminescence assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-25, Volume: 154Structure-based design of novel quinoxaline-2-carboxylic acids and analogues as Pim-1 inhibitors.
AID1224770Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of JAK1~B produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1214023Activity of CYP3A4 in human liver microsomes assessed as inhibition of troleandomycin-mediated N-desmethylimatinib formation at 0.1 uM after 5 mins by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1214024Oral bioavailability in chronic myeloid leukemia patient2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1224781Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of PAK4 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1680905Inhibition of beta secretase in mouse N2a695 cells expressing human APP assessed as induction of 16 kDa CTF-141 bands at 10 uM incubated for 5 hrs by Western blot analysis2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-28, Volume: 62, Issue:6
Development of Gleevec Analogues for Reducing Production of β-Amyloid Peptides through Shifting β-Cleavage of Amyloid Precursor Proteins.
AID1224778Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of NEK2 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1224784Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of PCTK1 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID629496Cell cycle arrest in human K562 cells assessed as accumulation at sub-G1 phase at 10 uM after 24 hrs by propidium iodide staining-based FACS analysis (Rvb = 0.27 +/- 0.04 %)2011European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 46, Issue:12
Synthesis and apoptosis inducing ability of new anilino substituted pyrimidine sulfonamides as potential anticancer agents.
AID1224802Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of TNIK produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1214011Fraction unbound in human liver microsomes containing CYP3A5 after 60 mins2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1224794Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of RSK2b produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID629498Cell cycle arrest in human K562 cells assessed as accumulation at S phase at 10 uM after 24 hrs by propidium iodide staining-based FACS analysis (Rvb = 11.23 +/- 0.8 %)2011European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 46, Issue:12
Synthesis and apoptosis inducing ability of new anilino substituted pyrimidine sulfonamides as potential anticancer agents.
AID1680909Drug level in C57BL/6J mouse brain at 50 mg/kg, ip measured after 4 hrs by LC-MS/MS analysis2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-28, Volume: 62, Issue:6
Development of Gleevec Analogues for Reducing Production of β-Amyloid Peptides through Shifting β-Cleavage of Amyloid Precursor Proteins.
AID1224789Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of PLK1 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID629499Cell cycle arrest in human K562 cells assessed as accumulation at G2/M phase at 10 uM after 24 hrs by propidium iodide staining-based FACS analysis (Rvb = 14.24 +/- 0.76 %)2011European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 46, Issue:12
Synthesis and apoptosis inducing ability of new anilino substituted pyrimidine sulfonamides as potential anticancer agents.
AID1214001Activity of human recombinant CYP3A5 in supersomes assessed as intrinsic clearance for enzyme-mediated N-desmethylimatinib formation by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID595155Growth inhibition of human GIST882 cells expressing c-Kit after 96 hrs by SRB assay2010ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-14, Volume: 1, Issue:7
Targeting the c-Kit Promoter G-quadruplexes with 6-Substituted Indenoisoquinolines.
AID1224791Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of PRKACA produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1224752Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of CAMK2B produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1680884Stability in human liver microsomes assessed as parent compound remaining level at 1 uM after 1 hrs by HPLC-MS/MS analysis2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-28, Volume: 62, Issue:6
Development of Gleevec Analogues for Reducing Production of β-Amyloid Peptides through Shifting β-Cleavage of Amyloid Precursor Proteins.
AID1214028Activity of human recombinant CYP3A5 in supersomes assessed as enzyme-mediated drug metabolism measured as parent compound remaining at 0.1 to 1 uM after 30 mins by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID360732Growth inhibition of human chronic myelogenous leukemia cells expressing BCR-ABL protein2007The Journal of biological chemistry, Feb-09, Volume: 282, Issue:6
Erlotinib effectively inhibits JAK2V617F activity and polycythemia vera cell growth.
AID1875917Antiviral activity against SARS-CoV2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 01-27, Volume: 65, Issue:2
Recent Developments in the Use of Kinase Inhibitors for Management of Viral Infections.
AID1224786Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of PIM1 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1214022Activity of CYP3A4 in human liver microsomes assessed as inhibition of ketoconazole-mediated N-desmethylimatinib formation at 0.1 uM after 5 mins by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1779216Cytotoxicity against imatinib mesylate resistant wild-type human KBM5 cells expressing T315I mutant assessed as cell growth inhibition measured after 48 hrs by MTT assay2021European journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-05, Volume: 221Discovery of pyrrole derivatives for the treatment of glioblastoma and chronic myeloid leukemia.
AID1224790Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of PLK4 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1743002Antiproliferative activity against human MKN-45 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 48 hrs by xCELLigence RTCA2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 207Design, synthesis and anti-cancer activity of pyrrole-imidazole polyamides through target-downregulation of c-kit gene expression.
AID1680889Stability in human liver microsomes assessed as parent compound remaining level at 1 uM after 0.5 hrs by HPLC-MS/MS analysis2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-28, Volume: 62, Issue:6
Development of Gleevec Analogues for Reducing Production of β-Amyloid Peptides through Shifting β-Cleavage of Amyloid Precursor Proteins.
AID1224787Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of PIM2 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1213998Activity of human recombinant CYP2D6 in supersomes assessed as intrinsic clearance for enzyme-mediated drug metabolism by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1359963Inhibition of recombinant rat DYRK1A kinase domain (1 to 499 residues) expressed in bacterial expression system using KKISGRLSPIMTEQ as substrate after 30 mins by ADP-Glo reagent based luminescence assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-25, Volume: 154Structure-based design of novel quinoxaline-2-carboxylic acids and analogues as Pim-1 inhibitors.
AID1680900Inhibition of beta secretase in mouse N2a cells expressing FL APP695 assessed as reduction of A-beta levels at 10 uM incubated for 5 hrs by MSD-ELISA2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-28, Volume: 62, Issue:6
Development of Gleevec Analogues for Reducing Production of β-Amyloid Peptides through Shifting β-Cleavage of Amyloid Precursor Proteins.
AID1214003Activity of human recombinant CYP2C8 in supersomes after 4 mins by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1224800Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of MST4 (2) produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1743001Antiproliferative activity against human Bel-7402 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 48 hrs by xCELLigence RTCA2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 207Design, synthesis and anti-cancer activity of pyrrole-imidazole polyamides through target-downregulation of c-kit gene expression.
AID1224753Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of CAMK2D produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1224801Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of MST1 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1224799Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of NDR1 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1680894Inhibition of BACE1 (unknown origin) at 10 uM2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-28, Volume: 62, Issue:6
Development of Gleevec Analogues for Reducing Production of β-Amyloid Peptides through Shifting β-Cleavage of Amyloid Precursor Proteins.
AID1213987Activity of human recombinant CYP2D6 in supersomes assessed as enzyme-mediated N-desmethylimatinib formation at 1 uM after 60 mins by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1224754Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of CAMK2G produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1224807Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of YSK1 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID396071Induction of apoptosis in human K562 cells after 48 hrs2008European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 43, Issue:11
Synthesis and induction of G0-G1 phase arrest with apoptosis of 3,5-dimethyl-6-phenyl-8-(trifluoromethyl)-5,6-dihydropyrazolo[3,4-f][1,2,3,5]tetrazepin-4(3H)-one.
AID764728Cell cycle arrest in human imatinib mesylate-resistant LAMA-84 cells assessed as accumulation at S and G2/M phase at 1 uM after 3 hrs by FACS analysis2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Sep-01, Volume: 21, Issue:17
Evaluation of novel aryloxyalkyl derivatives of imidazole and 1,2,4-triazole as heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) inhibitors and their antitumor properties.
AID1224798Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of DRAK1 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID266584Inhibition of c-ABL2006Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-15, Volume: 16, Issue:14
3-Benzimidazol-2-yl-1H-indazoles as potent c-ABL inhibitors.
AID629495Cytotoxicity against human MDA-MB-231 cells after 24 hrs by MTT assay2011European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 46, Issue:12
Synthesis and apoptosis inducing ability of new anilino substituted pyrimidine sulfonamides as potential anticancer agents.
AID1224785Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of PDK1 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1214021Activity of CYP2C8 in human liver microsomes assessed as inhibition of GEM-G-mediated N-desmethylimatinib formation at 0.1 uM after 5 mins by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1680893Inhibition of beta-secretase in mouse N2a cells expressed in FL-APP assessed as reduction of sAPPbeta levels at 10 uM incubated for 5 hrs by MSD-ELISA relative to control2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-28, Volume: 62, Issue:6
Development of Gleevec Analogues for Reducing Production of β-Amyloid Peptides through Shifting β-Cleavage of Amyloid Precursor Proteins.
AID1680915Inhibition of beta secretase in mouse N2a695 cells assessed as reduction in A-beta 40 levels at 10 uM incubated for 5 hrs by ELISA2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-28, Volume: 62, Issue:6
Development of Gleevec Analogues for Reducing Production of β-Amyloid Peptides through Shifting β-Cleavage of Amyloid Precursor Proteins.
AID1224751Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of CAMK2A produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1224772Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of MAP2K6 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1224775Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of ERK1 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1743003Antiproliferative activity against human SGC7901 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 48 hrs by xCELLigence RTCA2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 207Design, synthesis and anti-cancer activity of pyrrole-imidazole polyamides through target-downregulation of c-kit gene expression.
AID1680908Drug level in C57BL/6J mouse plasma at 50 mg/kg, ip measured after 4 hrs by LC-MS/MS analysis2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-28, Volume: 62, Issue:6
Development of Gleevec Analogues for Reducing Production of β-Amyloid Peptides through Shifting β-Cleavage of Amyloid Precursor Proteins.
AID1224806Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of VRK3 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1224766Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of CK1G3 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1359970Cytotoxicity against human KU812 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability after 48 hrs by MTT assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-25, Volume: 154Structure-based design of novel quinoxaline-2-carboxylic acids and analogues as Pim-1 inhibitors.
AID266585Antiproliferative activity against K562 cells expressing Bcr-Abl2006Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-15, Volume: 16, Issue:14
3-Benzimidazol-2-yl-1H-indazoles as potent c-ABL inhibitors.
AID1214000Activity of human recombinant CYP3A4 in supersomes assessed as intrinsic clearance for enzyme-mediated metabolite formation by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1224783Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of PAK6 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1213993Activity of human recombinant CYP3A4 in supersomes assessed as enzyme-mediated metabolite M6 formation at 1 uM after 60 mins by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1359966Inhibition of recombinant human haspin kinase domain (470 to 798 residues) expressed in bacterial expression system using histone H3 peptide as substrate after 30 mins by ADP-Glo reagent based luminescence assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-25, Volume: 154Structure-based design of novel quinoxaline-2-carboxylic acids and analogues as Pim-1 inhibitors.
AID1680903Inhibition of beta secretase in mouse N2a695 cells expressing human APP A673T mutant assessed as induction of 16 kDa CTF-141 bands at 10 uM incubated for 5 hrs by Western blot analysis2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-28, Volume: 62, Issue:6
Development of Gleevec Analogues for Reducing Production of β-Amyloid Peptides through Shifting β-Cleavage of Amyloid Precursor Proteins.
AID1224804Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of VRK1 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID588212Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID1224762Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of CLK2 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1213997Activity of human recombinant CYP2C8 in supersomes assessed as intrinsic clearance for enzyme-mediated metabolite formation by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1214032Activity of human recombinant CYP2C19 in supersomes assessed as enzyme-mediated drug metabolism measured as parent compound remaining at 0.1 to 1 uM after 30 mins by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1214005Activity of human recombinant CYP3A5 in supersomes after 30 mins by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1224759Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of CDKL1 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID1213990Activity of human recombinant CYP2C8 in supersomes assessed as enzyme-mediated metabolite M6 formation at 1 uM after 60 mins by LC/MS analysis2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1875892Antiviral activity against MERS-CoV infected in 1 hr pretreated African green monkey Vero E6 cells ssessed as inhibition of cytopathic effect incubated for 48 hrs by plate reader method2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 01-27, Volume: 65, Issue:2
Recent Developments in the Use of Kinase Inhibitors for Management of Viral Infections.
AID1359967Inhibition of recombinant mouse CLK1 expressed in bacterial expression system using GRSRSRSRSRSR as substrate after 30 mins by ADP-Glo reagent based luminescence assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-25, Volume: 154Structure-based design of novel quinoxaline-2-carboxylic acids and analogues as Pim-1 inhibitors.
AID1214007Fraction unbound in human liver microsomes containing CYP2B6 after 60 mins2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1214026Cmin in chronic myeloid leukemia patient at 400 mg, qd by multiple dose study2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 41, Issue:1
Autoinhibition of CYP3A4 leads to important role of CYP2C8 in imatinib metabolism: variability in CYP2C8 activity may alter plasma concentrations and response.
AID1224779Delta TM value showing the stabilisation of NEK6 produced by compound binding2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-18, Volume: 104, Issue:51
A systematic interaction map of validated kinase inhibitors with Ser/Thr kinases.
AID595156Growth inhibition of human HT-29 cells expressing c-Kit after 96 hrs by SRB assay2010ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-14, Volume: 1, Issue:7
Targeting the c-Kit Promoter G-quadruplexes with 6-Substituted Indenoisoquinolines.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID1794808Fluorescence-based screening to identify small molecule inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum apicoplast DNA polymerase (Pf-apPOL).2014Journal of biomolecular screening, Jul, Volume: 19, Issue:6
A High-Throughput Assay to Identify Inhibitors of the Apicoplast DNA Polymerase from Plasmodium falciparum.
AID1794808Fluorescence-based screening to identify small molecule inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum apicoplast DNA polymerase (Pf-apPOL).
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (11,074)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's17 (0.15)18.2507
2000's4641 (41.91)29.6817
2010's5115 (46.19)24.3611
2020's1301 (11.75)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 59.02

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index59.02 (24.57)
Research Supply Index9.43 (2.92)
Research Growth Index6.91 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index101.37 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (59.02)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials960 (8.36%)5.53%
Reviews1,800 (15.68%)6.00%
Case Studies2,269 (19.77%)4.05%
Observational69 (0.60%)0.25%
Other6,379 (55.58%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (500)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
An Open Label Clinical Trial of Imatinib Mesylate(Glivec)in Patients With Moderate to Severe Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis [NCT00981942]Phase 310 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
Randomized Phase II Trial of Gemcitabine and Imatinib Mesylate Versus Gemcitabine Alone in Patients With Previously Treated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer [NCT00323063]Phase 249 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-01Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual)
A Phase I-II Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec) Combined With Reinduction Chemotherapy Using Mitoxantrone, Etoposide and Cytarabine in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory C-kit Positive Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT01126814]Phase 1/Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
A Randomized Study Comparing Imatinib And Imatinib/Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2B in Newly Diagnosed Non-high Risk Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients in Complete Hematological Remission After Imatinib Induction Therapy [NCT01227356]Phase 2112 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
A Global Imatinib and Nilotinib Pregnancy Exposure Registry A Post-Authorisation Safety Study (PASS) [NCT01289054]4 participants (Actual)Observational2011-01-31Completed
Treatment With Second Generation TYROSINE KINASE INHIBITORS (2G TKI) Post Imatinib Failure: Factors Predicting Response and Predictive Value of Response [NCT01188278]173 participants (Actual)Observational2010-07-31Completed
A Phase II Study of the Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) Inhibitor RAD001 in Combination With Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Renal Carcinoma [NCT00331409]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
A Phase II, Open-label, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Imatinib Plus Hydroxyurea (HU) in Patients With Progressive Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) Receiving or Not Receiving Enzyme-inducing Anticonvulsant Drugs (EIACDs) [NCT00290771]Phase 2231 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Lack of efficacy)
An Open-label, Multicenter, Phase II Study to Evaluate the Ability of Glivec® (Imatinib, Formerly Known as STI571) to Produce a Biochemical Response in Patients With Rising PSA Following Radical Prostatectomy [NCT01316458]Phase 251 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
Open, Randomized, Phase II Study of Glivec in Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Expressing C-kit Plus 10 Year Extension Study [NCT00237185]Phase 2148 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-06-30Completed
A Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant/Adjuvant STI-571 (Gleevec NSC #716051) for Primary and Recurrent Operable Malignant GIST Expressing the KIT Receptor Tyrosine Kinase (CD117) [NCT00028002]Phase 263 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-03-31Completed
Therapy of Early Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML) With Higher-Dose Gleevec (STI571) [NCT00038649]Phase 2117 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Sponsor discontinued providing study drug.)
Therapy of Late Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML) With High-Dose Gleevec (STI571) [NCT01092741]Phase 247 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-07-31Completed
A Phase II Trial of the Treatment of Polycythemia Vera With Gleevec [NCT01120821]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-08-31Completed
CHOICES: A Randomized Phase II Trial of Imatinib (IM) Versus Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and IM for Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) in Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR) With Residual Disease Detectable by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction ( [NCT01227135]Phase 266 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-03-31Recruiting
A Phase Ib/II Study of PDR001 Plus Imatinib for Metastatic or Unresectable GIST With Prior Failure of Imatinib, Sunitinib and Regorafenib [NCT03609424]Phase 1/Phase 239 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-14Completed
Randomized Phase 2 Study of Intermittent vs Continuous Dosing Schedule of Imatinib in Patients With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Refractory Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) [NCT02712112]Phase 251 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-16Completed
Perioperative Imatinib Mesylate in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor [NCT01267695]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
Newly Diagnosed Adult Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Ph+ ALL). Sequential Treatment With Ponatinib and the Bispecific Monoclonal Antibody Blinatumomab vs Chemotherapy and Imatinib [NCT04722848]Phase 3236 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-08Recruiting
Multicenter Phase I Study of Imatinib, a Platelet-derived Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor, and LBH589, a Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor, in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed and Recurrent Chordoma [NCT01175109]Phase 136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-10-31Active, not recruiting
Effects of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors on Liver Enzymes and Electrolytes in Relation to Hematologic Response in Patients With Chronic Phase Chronic Meyloid Leukemia: Assiut University Hospital Insight [NCT04326933]40 participants (Anticipated)Observational2020-01-01Active, not recruiting
Phase 2 Study of Imatinib in Children With Neurofibromatosis and Airway Tumors [NCT03688568]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Enrollment not feasible)
Sustained Treatment-free Remission in BCR-ABL+ Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: a Prospective Study Comparing Nilotinib Versus Imatinib With Switch to Nilotinib in Absence of Optimal Response. SUSTRENIM Study - GIMEMA CLM1415 [NCT02602314]Phase 4450 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-11Active, not recruiting
Front-line Treatment of Philadelphia Positive (Ph Pos), BCRABL Positive, Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) With Two Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKI) (Nilotinib and Imotinib) A Phase II Exploratory Multicentric Centre. [NCT00769327]Phase 2129 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-09Completed
A Phase I/II, Randomized, Double-Blind Intervention Trial for Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib in Subjects With Advance Fibrosis [NCT05224128]Phase 1/Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-02-20Active, not recruiting
Triple Antimalarial Combination (Imatinib-DHA-PPQ) to Accelerate the Parasite Clearance and to Prevent the Selection of Resistant Parasites [NCT03697668]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-09-17Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Dose-Adjusted Etoposide, Prednisone, Vincristine, Cyclophosphamide, and Doxorubicin (DA-EPOCH) as Front-Line Therapy for Adults With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia/Lymphoma [NCT03023046]Phase 254 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-23Completed
Therapy of Hypereosinophilic Syndrome, Polycythemia Vera, Atypical CML or CMML With Platelet Derived Growth Factor (PDGF-R) Fusion Genes, or Mastocytosis With Imatinib Mesylate (STI571) [NCT00038675]125 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-06-30Completed
Phase II Study of Adding the Anti-PD-1 Pembrolizumab to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia and Persistently Detectable Minimal Residual Disease [NCT03516279]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-06-26Recruiting
Multicenter Trial Estimating the Persistence of Molecular Remission in Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia in Long Term After Stopping Imatinib [NCT01343173]220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-04-06Completed
LAM Pilot Study With Imatinib Mesylate [NCT03131999]Phase 1/Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-23Completed
[NCT01491763]Phase 470 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-01-31Recruiting
A Phase 2 Study of 5 Years of Adjuvant Imatinib in Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor With a High Risk of Recurrence Following Surgical Resection [NCT05385549]Phase 235 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-07Recruiting
Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Chemotherapy Combination With Imatinib (Glivec®) and 5-FU/Leucovorin in Patients With Advanced Carcinoma of the Gallbladder and Bile Duct [NCT01153750]Phase 244 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
A Multi-center, Single Arm, Phase II Study of Adjuvant Imatinib (Glivec®) in Patients Following the Resection of Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor ( GIST) [NCT01172548]Phase 2132 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
Role of Surgery in Patients With Focally Progressive Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) After Imatinib Treatment: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Trial [NCT03862768]92 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-31Not yet recruiting
Dose Individualization of Antineoplastic Drugs and Anti-Infective Drug in Children With Hematoplastic Disease [NCT03844360]Phase 41,500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-01-31Recruiting
A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Imatinib Mesylate (Impentri®) in Subjects With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Induced by COVID-19 [NCT04794088]Phase 267 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-14Terminated(stopped due to Due to the decline of COVID-19 patients on Dutch ICUs. A sample size reestimation based on blinded study data of 66 patients was furthermore favorable, indicating sufficient power to detect a difference in primary endpoint between groups.)
A Randomized Open-label Study of 400 mg Versus 800 mg of Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With Newly Diagnosed, Previously Untreated Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Using Molecular Endpoints. [NCT00124748]Phase 3476 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Terminated(stopped due to This study was prematurely discontinued because no improvement was observed in the 800mg dose compared to 400mg dose)
Imatinib in Acute Ischaemic Stroke: A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel-arm Efficacy Trial of Imatinib in Acute Ischaemic Stroke [NCT03639922]Phase 31,260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-10-01Recruiting
A Prospective Phase II Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and the Safety of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Withdrawal After a Previous Two-step Dose Reduction in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Deep Molecular Remission [NCT04147533]Phase 2150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-16Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Trial Of Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec) In Patients With HIV Related Kaposi's Sarcoma [NCT00090987]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
Phase II Trial of STI571 (NSC 716051) in Patients With Recurrent Meningioma [NCT00045734]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-02-28Completed
Imatinib Continuation Versus Nilotinib 300 mg Twice Daily in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) in Chronic Phase and Major Molecular Re-sponse (MMR) Without Molecular Response ≥ 4.5 Log (MR4.5) Receiving Imatinib at a Dose of 400 to 800 mg Daily [NCT02174445]Phase 314 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Terminated(stopped due to very slow recruitment rate and a lot of pat. didn't fulfil BCR-ABL requirements)
A Phase II Study of Binimetinib in Combination With Imatinib in Patients With Advanced KIT-Mutant Melanoma [NCT04598009]Phase 225 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-03Recruiting
A Trial of Dovitinib in Combination With Imatinib in Patients With Metastatic or Unresectable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors After Failure to Imatinib and Sunitinib [NCT02268435]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Dovitinib Production stopped)
Phase I/II Study of Temozolomide and Gleevec (Imatinib Mesylate, Formerly Known as STI571) in Advanced Melanoma [NCT00667953]Phase 1/Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Difficulty enrolling subjects)
A Phase II Study of Perifosine Plus Imatinib Mesylate for Patients With Resistant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor [NCT00455559]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
Extension Study of a Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Imatinib (Glinib®) 600mg/Day Depending on Early Molecular Response in Newly Diagnosed Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase [NCT02421926]0 participants (Actual)Observational2014-10-31Withdrawn
Imatinib for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Relapses - a Phase II, Randomised Study [NCT03674099]Phase 2200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-10-01Recruiting
A Phase 2, Randomized, Open Label, Pivotal Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of HQP1351 in CML CP Patients Who Are Resistant and/or Intolerant to First- and Second-Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors [NCT04126681]Phase 2144 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-21Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicentre 2-arm, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Imatinib Mesylate in Reducing the Severity of Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in Patients With Critical COVID-19 Re [NCT04953052]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-10-14Withdrawn(stopped due to Number of moderate to severe ARDS patients hospitalised due to COVID19 diminishingly small. Not expected to recruit required minimum number of patients.)
A Phase II, Open-label, Study in Patients With Refractory, Metastatic Cancer Harboring KIT Mutation or Amplification to Investigate the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Imatinib Therapy [NCT02461849]Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-04Active, not recruiting
I-SPY COVID TRIAL: An Adaptive Platform Trial to Reduce Mortality and Ventilator Requirements for Critically Ill Patients [NCT04488081]Phase 21,500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-31Recruiting
A Phase I, Multicenter, Open-label Study of Oral ABL001 in Patients With Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML) or Philadelphia Chromosome-positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Ph+ ALL) [NCT02081378]Phase 1326 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-24Completed
An Open Label, Multi-center Imatinib Roll-over Protocol for Patients Who Have Completed a Previous Novartis-sponsored Imatinib Study and Are Judged by the Investigator to Benefit From Continued Imatinib Treatment [NCT01742299]Phase 4155 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-26Active, not recruiting
An Open-Label, Randomised, Multi-Centre, Phase II Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of AT13387, Either as Monotherapy or in Combination With Imatinib, in Patients With Unresectable and/or Metastatic Malignant GIST Whose Tumour Has Progressed Fo [NCT01294202]Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
Explore the Synergy of Combination TKI Therapy - A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Effect of Imatinib on Dasatinib Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Volunteers [NCT02129166]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to PI resigned)
Evaluation of the Therapeutic Effect of Hydroxyurea Pulse Therapy for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients [NCT03515018]Phase 360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-05-01Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Imatinib Dose Escalation to 800 mg/Day in Korean Patients With Metastatic or Unresectable GIST Harboring KIT Exon 9 Mutation: Imatinib Dose Escalation [NCT01541709]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Active, not recruiting
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Active-controlled, 2-parallel Group, Phase III Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of Masitinib at 7.5 mg/kg/Day to Imatinib at 400 or 600 mg in Treatment of Patients With Gastro-intestinal Stromal Tumo [NCT00812240]Phase 3335 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Sponsor decision based on portfolio prioritization)
Phase-III Randomized Study to Optimize TKIs Multiple Approaches - (OPTkIMA) - and Quality of Life (QoL) in Elderly Patients (≥60 Years) With Ph+ Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) and MR3.0 / MR4.0 Stable Molecular Response [NCT02326311]Phase 3502 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-06-10Recruiting
Phase II Multicenter Clinical Trial on Imatinib Treatment for Patients With Resectable Hepatic Metastasis From Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) [NCT00764595]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Asciminib as Initial Therapy for Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase With Addition of Lower Dose Tyrosine Kinas Inhibitors for Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who do Not Achieve a Deep Molecular Remission [NCT05143840]Phase 28 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-22Recruiting
A Phase III, Multi-center, Open-Label, Randomized Study of the Efficacy of Radotinib Versus Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome Positive (Ph+) Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Chinese Patients in Chronic Phase [NCT03722420]Phase 3238 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-12-28Active, not recruiting
KISS Study: A Phase II Study of Dasatinib Followed by Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed, Previously Untreated Patients With Chronic Phase CML [NCT03193281]Phase 291 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-17Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Trial for Adults With Newly Diagnosed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [NCT01085617]Phase 31,033 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Active, not recruiting
Front-line Treatment of Ph Positive (Ph+)/Bcr-Abl Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) With Two Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKI) (Imatinib and Nilotinib). A Phase II Exploratory Multicentric Study in Elderly Patients and in Patients Unfit for Progr [NCT01025505]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Completed
Phase II Study for Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of Imatinib Mesylate in Children With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Philadelphia Chromosome-positive (Ph+) [NCT01221376]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-02-28Active, not recruiting
Phase II Study to Evaluate Glivec (Imatinib Mesylate) to Induce Progression Arrest in Aggressive Fibromatosis / Desmoid Tumors Not Amenable to Surgical Resection With R0 Intent or Accompanied by Unacceptable Function Loss [NCT01137916]Phase 239 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
Phase I Study Investigating the Safety and Feasibility of Combining Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec) With Sorafenib in Patients With Androgen-Independent Chemotherapy-Failure Prostate Cancer. [NCT00424385]Phase 117 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Randomized, Multi-center, Open-label Phase III Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Flumatinib vs Imatinib as First Line Treatment in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia. [NCT02204644]Phase 3400 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
A Phase IV Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Imatinib(Glinib®) 600mg/Day Depending on Early Molecular Response in Newly Diagnosed Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase [NCT02204722]Phase 455 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-13Terminated(stopped due to Sponsor's decision to halt the study.)
Phase I/II Trial of Imatinib Mesylate; (Gleevec; STI571) in Treatment of Recurrent Oligodendroglioma and Mixed Oligoastrocytoma [NCT00049127]Phase 1/Phase 264 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
A Phase II Trial of Sequential Chemotherapy, Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec, STI571) (NSC # 716051), and Transplantation for Adults With Newly Diagnosed Ph+ Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia by the CALGB and SWOG [NCT00039377]Phase 258 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-04-30Completed
Impact of the Inhibitors of Tyrosine Kinase on the Male Fertility [NCT01114087]2 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study of Ruxolitinib (NSC-752295) in Combination With BCR-ABL Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Patients With Molecular Evidence of Disease [NCT03654768]Phase 284 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-10-24Active, not recruiting
ALLTogether1 - A Treatment Study Protocol of the ALLTogether Consortium for Children and Young Adults (0-45 Years of Age) With Newly Diagnosed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL) [NCT04307576]Phase 36,430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-13Recruiting
International Phase 3 Trial in Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Ph+ALL) Testing Imatinib in Combination With Two Different Cytotoxic Chemotherapy Backbones [NCT03007147]Phase 3475 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-08-08Recruiting
An Open Label, Time-To-Event Continuous Reassessment Method, Phase I/II Study of the Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) Inhibitor RAD001 in Combination With Imatinib (Gleevec) in Patients With Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) With Persistent [NCT01188889]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Unable to obtain sufficient funding.)
An Exploratory Single Center Study of High-dose Treatment of Glivec® in Patients With Newly Diagnosed, Previously Untreated Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Using Molecular Endpoints - TOPS (Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Optimization and Sel [NCT01216085]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
Imatinib Mesylate Therapy in Systemic Mastocytosis Patients Lacking KIT Mutations [NCT01297777]Phase 410 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
Phase II Study for Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of Imatinib Mesylate in Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Philadelphia Chromosome-positive (Ph+) [NCT01222013]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)InterventionalSuspended(stopped due to Study was suspended before recruitment, due to logistic issues.)
Exploratory Study of Drug Sensitivity Prediction Software (IRCR-DReSS) With Patient-derived Tumor Cells of Metastatic Gastric Cancer [NCT03170180]Phase 266 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-01Completed
A Retrospective Cohort Study [NCT03424876]60 participants (Anticipated)Observational2017-06-02Recruiting
A Randomization, Double Blind, Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Imatinib for Prophylaxis of CMV Infection After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT03343600]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-09Terminated(stopped due to The trial is terminated due to the extremely low recruitment rate.)
Treatment of CML Patients With Imatinib and Hydroxyurea [NCT02480608]Phase 1/Phase 2113 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
Imatinib Mesylate in Combination With Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced KIT-mutant Melanoma Following Progression on Standard Therapy: a Phase I/II Trial [NCT04546074]Phase 1/Phase 222 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-14Recruiting
Long-term Follow-up of a Randomized Multicenter Trial on Impact of Imatinib and Infliximab on Long-COVID in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients [NCT05220280]Phase 4400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-06Recruiting
A Randomized Phase II Study of Imatinib and Rituximab for Cutaneous Sclerosis After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation [NCT01309997]Phase 272 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
The Life After Stopping Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Study (The LAST Study) [NCT02269267]Phase 2173 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-18Completed
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing Nilotinib 800mg to Imatinib 800 mg for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced and/or Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Refractory to Imatinib 400 mg [NCT00751036]Phase 394 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Terminated
A Pilot Study of Imatinib Mesylate in Steroid Refractory Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease [NCT00760981]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
Phase III Randomized, Intergroup, International Trial Assessing the Clinical Activity of STI-571 at Two Dose Levels in Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) Expressing the KIT Receptor Tyrosine Kinase (CD117) [NCT00685828]Phase 3946 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-01-31Active, not recruiting
A Pilot Window of Opportunity Study of Imatinib in Combination With Cetuximab in Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Head and Neck [NCT05816785]Early Phase 115 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-18Recruiting
Phase I/II, Open Label Study of Sequential Taxotere® (Docetaxel) and Gleevec® (Imatinib Mesylate) in Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer [NCT00861471]Phase 1/Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Terminated(stopped due to due to slow accrual)
A PHASE 3 RANDOMIZED, OPEN-LABEL STUDY OF BOSUTINIB VERSUS IMATINIB IN SUBJECTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED CHRONIC PHASE PHILADELPHIA CHROMOSOME POSITIVE CHRONIC MYELOGENOUS LEUKEMIA [NCT00574873]Phase 3502 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-05Completed
A 24-week Randomized Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Multi-center Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Oral QTI571 as an add-on Therapy in the Treatment of Severe Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Imatinib in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertensio [NCT00902174]Phase 3202 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
[NCT00845221]Phase 444 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
A Multi-centre, Open-label, Proof of Concept (PoC) Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of STI571 for the Treatment of Fibrosis in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis [NCT00613171]Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-02Completed
Phase III Study of Imatinib Mesylate in Combination With Hydroxyurea Versus Hydroxyurea Alone as an Oral Therapy in Patients With Temozolomide Resistant Progressive Glioblastoma [NCT00154375]Phase 3240 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-31Completed
Phase II Study of Imatinib Mesylate in Neurofibromatosis Type I Patients Aged 2 to 21 With Plexiform Neurofibromas [NCT02177825]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual 5 patients out of 25 expected. Primary objectives could not be met without recruiting more patients.)
A Phase Ib Clinical Study of BBI608 for Adult Patients With Advanced, Refractory Hematologic Malignancies [NCT02352558]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Completed
A Randomised Phase II Trial of Imatinib Alternating With Regorafenib Compared to Imatinib Alone for the First Line Treatment of Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumour (GIST) [NCT02365441]Phase 278 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-30Active, not recruiting
Nilotinib Versus Imatinib in Treatment of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia [NCT03228303]Early Phase 1100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-12-01Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Multicenter Phase III Trial Evaluating the Interest of Imatinib Treatment Maintenance or Interruption After 3 Years of Adjuvant Treatment in Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours (GIST) [NCT02260505]Phase 3134 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-12-24Recruiting
Entacapone in Combination With Imatinib Mesylate for Treatment of Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors(GIST) Following Failure of at Least Imatinib and Sunitinib [NCT04006769]Early Phase 15 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-30Completed
A Phase II Study of Dose-Adjusted Etoposide, Prednisone, Vincristine, Cyclophosphamide, and Doxorubicin Plus Asparaginase (DA-EPOCH-A) for Adults With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia/Lymphoma [NCT02538926]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-07-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Drugs unavailable)
Phase II Study of Imatinib Mesylate and Docetaxel in Pretreated Patients With Metastatic NSCLC [NCT01083589]Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
A Phase III Randomized Study Evaluating Surgery of Residual Disease in Patients With Metastatic Gastro-intestinal Stromal Tumor Responding to Imatinib Mesylate. [NCT00956072]Phase 312 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Terminated(stopped due to low accrual)
Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Glivec® in Combination With Vincristine and Dexamethasone in Patients With Lymphoid Blast Crisis CML or Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Relapse or Refractory [NCT00763763]Phase 255 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-12-31Completed
A Phase I/II Dose Escalation Study of Subcutaneous Campath-1H (NSC #715969, IND #10864) During Intensification Therapy in Adults With Untreated Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) [NCT00061945]Phase 1/Phase 2302 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
A Phase I/II Trial Of STI571 In Children With Newly Diagnosed Poor Prognosis Brainstem Gliomas And Recurrent Intracranial Malignant Gliomas [NCT00021229]Phase 1/Phase 285 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Poor accrual)
A Phase II Study of Imatinib in Patients With Mucosal or Acral/Lentiginous Melanoma and Melanomas That Arise on Chronically Sun Damaged Skin. [NCT00424515]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
A Phase II Evaluation of Gleevec(TM) (NCI-Supplied Agent: STI571 [Imatinib Mesylate], NSC# 716051) in the Treatment of Recurrent or Persistent Carcinosarcoma of the Uterus [NCT00075400]Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
Treatment of Acute Cervical Spinal Cord Injury With Imatinib (Glivec®) - a Safety and Feasibility Study (EudraCT no 2014-002170-36) [NCT02363361]Phase 210 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-04-30Not yet recruiting
IMATINIB Plus Hydroxyurea in the Treatment of Recurrent or Progressive Meningiomas: a Randomized Phase II Study [NCT00904735]Phase 276 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-06-30Recruiting
"A Window of Opportunity Trial With Brentuximab Vedotin and Imatinib in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory ALK+ Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma or Patients Ineligible for Chemotherapy" [NCT02462538]Phase 1/Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-03Terminated(stopped due to Due to slow recruitment, recruitment of new patients was stopped, FU was completed for enrolled patients)
Compliance to Long Term Imatinib Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia. [NCT00632255]88 participants (Actual)Observational2008-01-31Completed
Adjunct Targeted Biologic Inhibition in Children With Multivessel Intraluminal Pulmonary Vein Stenosis [NCT00891527]Phase 1/Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Asciminib Used in Consolidation With Imatinib v. Imatinib to Achieve Treatment-free Remission in Chronic Phase-Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Patients [NCT05413915]Phase 3164 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-19Recruiting
IMPACT-TB (Imatinib Mesylate Per Oral as a Clinical Therapeutic for TB): A Phase II Clinical Trial of the Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Hematologic Effects of Imatinib on Myelopoiesis in Adults When Given With and Without Isoniazid and Rifabutin [NCT03891901]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-27Completed
Efficacy of Adjuvant Imatinib in Patients With Intermediate-risk Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor With a High-risk Genomic Grade Index. Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Study. Etude Multicentrique, Prospective, randomisée [NCT02576080]Phase 380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-10-31Not yet recruiting
A Multi-center Study of the Discontinuation of Imatinib in Adult Patients With Ph+ CML in CP Who Have a Complete Molecular Response to Imatinib [NCT01564836]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-06-30Recruiting
DFCI ALL Adult Consortium Protocol: Adult ALL Trial [NCT01005758]Phase 2180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-01-31Not yet recruiting
Dose Finding and Phase II Study of STI 571 in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma [NCT00006357]Phase 1/Phase 291 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-08-31Completed
A Multi-centre, Adaptive, Randomized, Open-label, Controlled Clinical Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of Investigational Therapeutics for the Treatment of COVID-19 in Hospitalized Patients (CATCO: Canadian Treatments for COVID-19), in Conjunction With th [NCT04330690]Phase 32,900 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-03-18Active, not recruiting
Phase II Study of Letrozole (Femara) Plus Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec) for Postmenopausal Patients With ER and/or PR Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer [NCT00338728]Phase 259 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-03Completed
Imatinib Mesylate And Cyclophosphamide In Metronomic Administration: Dose Escalation Study Of Imatinib Mesylate in Patient With Rare Tumor (Phase I Study) [NCT01046487]Phase 126 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
A Phase IIIB, Randomized, Active Controlled Open-Label Study Of Sunitinib (Sutent) 37.5 Mg Daily Vs Imatinib Mesylate 800 Mg Daily In The Treatment Of Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) Who Have Had Progressive Disease While On 400 Mg Da [NCT00372567]Phase 369 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Terminated(stopped due to See termination reason in detailed description.)
A Non-randomized, Open-label Study to Characterize the Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Glivec/Gleevec® (Imatinib Mesylate) in Pediatric (Age Range 1 to Less Than 4 Years) Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) or Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Acute Lymp [NCT01066468]Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Terminated
A Phase II Study of Imatinib and Valproic Acid in Patients With CML [NCT01011998]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Withdrawn due to lack of accrual per Center DSMP, with PI concurrence)
Population Pharmacokinetics of Imatinib in CML Patients in Iran [NCT02146846]170 participants (Actual)Observational2012-10-31Terminated
Phase II Trial Evaluating Gleevec (Imatinib Mesylate Formerly Known as STI571) in Patients With Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer [NCT00115739]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-02-29Terminated(stopped due to Study was closed early due to slow accrual)
A Phase II Open-Label Study of the Intravenous Administration of Homoharringtonine (CGX-635) Combined With the Oral Administration of Gleevec in the Treatment of Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) in Chronic, Accelerated, and Blast Phase [NCT00114959]Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Poor enrollment)
Phase I-II Study of Ruxolitinib (INCB18424) for Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) With Minimal Residual Disease While on Therapy With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors [NCT01751425]Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-24Terminated(stopped due to Per PI Request. 2) No additional benefit was noted with the addition of Ruxolitinib.)
A Phase I/II Study of Gleevec/Taxol in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Stage IIIC or IV or Recurrent (Any Stage) Uterine Papillary Serous Carcinoma (UPSC) [NCT00506779]Phase 1/Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-29Terminated(stopped due to the study was terminated early due to poor enrollment)
PrecISE (Precision Interventions for Severe and/or Exacerbation-Prone Asthma) Network Study [NCT04129931]Phase 2600 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-12-19Recruiting
Phase II Study of Paclitaxel With Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec) in Taxane-pretreated Ovarian and Other Cancers of Mullerian Origin [NCT00840450]Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Due to slow accrual)
An Open Label Phase 2 Pilot Study to Determine the Safety, Efficacy and Tolerability of Gleevec (Imatinib Mesylate) in the Treatment of Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis [NCT00677092]Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Completed
Therapeutic and Biological Effects of Imatinib Mesylate in Primary Hypereosinophilic Syndromes [NCT00787384]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-31Completed
A Phase II, Non-Randomized, Open-Label Multicenter Study of 5 Year Adjuvant Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec®) in Patients at Significant Risk for Recurrence Following Complete Resection of Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) [NCT00867113]Phase 291 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-22Completed
A Phase II Trial Evaluating the Safety and the Efficacy of High-Dose Imatinib in Relapsed/Refractory c-Kit Positive and BCR-Abl Negative AML Patients [NCT00707408]Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-02-29Completed
A Pilot Study of Gleevec (Imatinib Mesylate) in Relapsed/Refractory T Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00684411]Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
A Phase I Study to Determine the Safety of Imatinib in Combination With PTK787/ZK222584 in Patients With Refractory and/or Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT00611689]Phase 145 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
A Single Stage Phase II, Multi-centre, Open Label Study of Imatinib in Combination With Pioglitazone, Etoricoxib, Dexamethasone and Low-dose Treosulfane for Anti-inflammatory and Angiostatic Treatment in Patients With Hormone-refractory Prostate Cancer [NCT00427999]Phase 267 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
Phase III Randomized Trial of Autologous and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Versus Intensive Conventional Chemotherapy in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in First Remission [NCT00002514]Phase 31,929 participants (Actual)Interventional1993-05-07Completed
"Phase II Proof of Concept Study of TALL-104 (MHC Non-Restricted Cytotoxic T-Cell Line) and Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec) in Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase" [NCT00415909]Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Slow Accrual)
Phase II Trial of the Addition of PEG-Asparaginase to the Hyper-CVAD Regimen in Adult Newly-Diagnosed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [NCT01005914]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Increased rate of bacterial infections)
Phase I Study of Zactima (ZD6474) Plus Imatinib Mesylate and Hydroxyurea for Patients With Recurrent Malignant Glioma [NCT00613054]Phase 127 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Phase I Dose Escalation of Gleevec in Combination With RAD001 Plus Hydroxyurea for Patients With Recurrent Malignant Glioma [NCT00613132]Phase 178 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
A Randomized, Phase 3 Study of Dose Escalation Versus No Dose Escalation of Imatinib In Metastatic GIST Patients With Imatinib Trough Levels Less Than 1100 Nanograms/mL [NCT01031628]Phase 35 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Lack of feasibility secondary to slow accrual)
Randomized, Open Label Study of Dasatinib (100mg qd) vs. High-Dose Imatinib (600mg) in Patients With Chronic Phase CML Who Have Had Suboptimal Response After 3-18 Months of Therapy With Imatinib (400mg) [NCT00854841]0 participants Expanded AccessAvailable
A Phase II Study of the Association of Glivec® (Imatinib Mesylate, Formerly Known as STI 571) Plus Gemzar® (Gemcitabine) in Patients With Unresectable, Refractory, Malignant Mesothelioma Expressing Either PDGFR-Beta or C-Kit [NCT00551252]Phase 256 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-01-31Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of Generic Imatinib in a Real-World Setting Among Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients in Egypt [NCT03454503]173 participants (Actual)Observational2018-05-13Completed
Phase II Trial of Imatinib(Gleevec®) in Selected Patients With Metastatic Melanoma [NCT00881049]Phase 21 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
A Pilot Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib in Reducing Monocytosis or Leukocytosis in Patients With Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia and Atypical Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia, Respectively [NCT00079313]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-14Completed
A Single-arm, Phase II Clinical Study of Imatinib Mesylate Combined With Toripalimab in the Treatment of Stage III Unresectable and Stage IV Melanoma Harbored With CKIT Mut [NCT05274438]Phase 237 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-26Recruiting
A Phase III Multi-center, Open-label, Randomized Study of the Efficacy of Nilotinib Versus Imatinib in Adult Patients With Ph+ CML in Early CP Who Have a Suboptimal Molecular Response to Imatinib [NCT01400074]Phase 3100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-01-31Recruiting
Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Metformin and Imatinib in Healthy Volunteers. [NCT01404715]Phase 111 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
Preliminary Evaluation of TKI Exposure-response Relationships in Real World Patients (RWPs) With Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML) [NCT03885830]45 participants (Actual)Observational2019-06-20Completed
Pilot Study to Examine The Use of Imatinib (Gleevec) For The Treatment of Active Alveolitis in Systemic Sclerosis [NCT00512902]Phase 1/Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Gleevec® (Imatinib Mesylate, NSC 716051 Formerly ST1571) in Children With Pulmonary Hypertension [NCT00583115]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Unable to enroll subjects)
Neoadjuvant Hormonal Ablation, Imatinib Mesylate and Docetaxel Followed by Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer [NCT00500110]Phase 239 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
A Phase I Dose Escalation Study of LBH589 in Combination With Imatinib Mesylate for Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Cytogenetic Remission With Residual Disease Detectable by Q-PCR [NCT00686218]Phase 19 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
A Phase I/II Study of Gleevec® Combined With Panitumumab (Vectibix®) in Patients Prescreened for C-kit/PDGFr Activated Pathways Using a Proteomic Based Assay [NCT00867334]Phase 1/Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
A Phase I/II Study of Capecitabine/Oxaliplatin (XELOX) in Combination With Bevacizumab and Imatinib as First-line Treatment of Patients With Stage IV Colorectal Cancer [NCT00784446]Phase 1/Phase 251 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
A Randomized, Open Label, Multi-center Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Nilotinib Versus Imatinib in Adult Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) [NCT00785785]Phase 3644 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
STI571 (Imatinib) in KIT-expressing Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST): a Prospective, Open-label, Multicenter Study on Best Clinical Use in the Advanced Disease. [NCT00940563]Phase 2135 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-03-31Completed
A Phase 1b/2a, Open-label, Multicentre Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Antitumor Activity of Vactosertib in Combination With Imatinib in Patients With Advanced Desmoid Tumor (Aggressive Fibromatosis) [NCT03802084]Phase 1/Phase 224 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-04-15Active, not recruiting
Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide, Imatinib Mesylate and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia [NCT01003054]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
An Open Label, Randomized Study of Nilotinib vs. Standard Imatinib (400/600 mg QD) Comparing the Kinetics of Complete Molecular Response for CML-CP Patients With Evidence of Persistent Leukemia by RQ-PCR. [NCT00760877]Phase 3207 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Generic Imatinib (Carcemia®) Compared to Glivec® in Real-Life Management of Chronic Phase of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia; a Multicenter, Observational Study [NCT05282108]240 participants (Anticipated)Observational2022-07-20Recruiting
Gleevec (Imatinib) Plus Multi-Agent Chemotherapy For Newly-Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [NCT00618501]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Imatinib Resumption Combined With Atezolizumab Versus Imatinib Resumption Alone in Patients With Unresectable Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) After Failure of Sta [NCT05152472]Phase 2110 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-14Recruiting
A Phase III, Multi-center, Open-label, Randomized Study of Oral Asciminib Versus Investigator Selected TKI in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase [NCT04971226]Phase 3405 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-10-06Active, not recruiting
An Open-Label Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of STI571 in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Blast Crisis [NCT00006475]Phase 20 participants Interventional2000-09-30Completed
A Multicenter, Phase Ib/II Trial of Selinexor as a Single Agent and in Combination With Imatinib in Patients With Metastatic and/or Unresectable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) [NCT04138381]Phase 1/Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-16Active, not recruiting
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With Various Types of Malignancies Involving Activated Tyrosine Kinase Enzymes [NCT00171912]Phase 238 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
Phase II Study of Imatinib Mesylate for Philadelphia-Positive Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia [NCT00154349]Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-31Completed
Phase II Study of Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With Life Threatening Malignant Rare Diseases [NCT00154388]Phase 2185 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-02-28Completed
Phase II Study of Imatinib (Glivec) Administered as a Daily Oral Treatment in Patients With Recurrent/Metastatic Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Head and Neck Overexpressing KIT [NCT00180921]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-07-31Recruiting
An Open Label, 3-arm, Randomised Phase II Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Ponatinib in Combination With Either Chemotherapy or Blinatumomab With Imatinib Plus Chemotherapy as Front-line Therapy for Patients Aged 55 Years and Over With Philadel [NCT04688983]Phase 2180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-31Not yet recruiting
A Phase III Randomized Study of Imatinib, With or Without Bevacizumab (NSC-704865), in Patients With Metastatic or Unresectable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors [NCT00324987]Phase 312 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Terminated(stopped due to The trial failed to accrue)
A Phase I Study of Gemcitabine Plus Oxaliplatin in Combination With Imatinib Mesylate (Glivec) in Patients With Gemcitabine-refractory Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas [NCT01048320]Phase 136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
Safety And Efficacy Of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Cessation For Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients With Stable Molecular Response In A Real World Population [NCT04626024]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-22Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Gleevec in Patients With Recurrent Platinum-Resistant, Taxane-Resistant Epithelial Ovarian Cancer, Primary Peritoneal Cancer, or Fallopian Tube Cancer [NCT00510653]Phase 273 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-03-31Completed
A Phase 2 Study of Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec) as Maintenance Therapy After Induction and Consolidation Chemotherapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed C-kit Positive Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT00509093]Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
A Pilot Study of Imatinib in the Treatment of Refractory Systemic Sclerosis [NCT00506831]Phase 1/Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
A Phase III Study of STI571 Versus Interferon-α (IFN-α) Combined With Cytarabine (Ara-C) in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Previously Untreated Philadelphia Chromosome Positive (Ph+) Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) [NCT00333840]Phase 31,106 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-06-30Completed
An Open-label, Randomized Study of Dasatinib vs High-dose (800-mg) Imatinib in the Treatment of Subjects With Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Have Had a Suboptimal Response After at Least 3 Months of Therapy With 400 mg Imatinib [NCT00320190]Phase 252 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Terminated due to slow participant accrual)
Imatinib Mesylate, Busulfan, Fludarabine, Antithymocyte Globulin and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia [NCT00499889]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Support issue.)
An Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Phase III Trial of Dasatinib (SPRYCEL®) vs. Standard Dose Imatinib (400 mg) in the Treatment of Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia [NCT00481247]Phase 3547 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
A Phase III Multi-center, Open-label, Randomized Study of Imatinib Versus Nilotinib in Adult Patients With Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome Positive (Ph+) Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) [NCT00471497]Phase 3846 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
A Phase II Trial of STI571 in the Treatment of Metastatic Gastric Cancer [NCT00068380]Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-31Completed
Phase II Evaluation of Gleevec Combined With Camptosar Plus Paraplatin in Patients With Previously Untreated Extensive Stage SCLC [NCT00193349]Phase 260 participants Interventional2002-09-30Completed
A Phase II Study of Imatinib Mesylate (STI571;NSC#716051:IND 61135) in Patients With Inoperable AJCC Stage III or IV Melanoma Harboring Somatic Alterations of C-KIT [NCT00470470]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
Phase II Study of Gleevec (Imatinib Mesylate) in Patients With Idiopathic Hypereosinophilic Syndrome (HES) [NCT00230334]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-12Terminated(stopped due to terminated by PI due to insufficient accrual)
Phase II Trial to Study the Tolerability and the Effectiveness of Imatinib in Patients With Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase With Age More Than 70, Diagnosis of CML is Being Performed Within 1 Year [NCT00219752]Phase 230 participants Interventional2002-05-31Completed
Phase II Study of Nilotinib Plus Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2b as First-line Therapy in Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukaemia Aiming to Maximize Complete Molecular Response and Major Molecular Response. [NCT02001818]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-04-30Recruiting
Preoperative Imatinib Mesylate Combined With Rectal-sparing Surgery in Patients With c-KIT Gene-mutant Rectal GIST: an Open-label, Single-arm, Phase III Trial(PIRKER) [NCT05970900]Phase 323 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-01Not yet recruiting
A Pilot Study of Genomic Sequencing Guided Individualized Therapy in Gastrointestinal Cancers [NCT02013089]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-12-31Recruiting
A National Multicenter, Noninterventional Clinical Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Avapritinib in Chinese Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) in the Real World [NCT05381753]200 participants (Anticipated)Observational2022-08-29Recruiting
Phase I Dose Escalation of Gleevec in Combination With PTK787/ZK 222584 (PTK/ZK) Plus Hydroxyurea [NCT00387933]Phase 137 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
A Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of STI571 in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Accelerated Phase [NCT00006052]Phase 20 participants Interventional2000-06-30Completed
A Phase III Study of STI571 Versus Interferon-a (IFN-a) Combined With Cytarabine (Ara-C) in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Previously Untreated Philadelphia Chromosome Positive (Ph+) Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) [NCT00006343]Phase 30 participants Interventional2000-06-30Completed
Phase Ib Study of Imatinib to Increase RUNX1 Activity in Participants With Germline RUNX1 Deficiency [NCT06090669]Phase 178 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-03Recruiting
Low-Dose Oral Imatinib in the Treatment of Scleroderma Pulmonary Involvement: A Phase II Pilot Study [NCT00573326]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-02-28Recruiting
A Phase I Study of Imatinib Mesylate and SU011248 for Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors [NCT00573404]Phase 16 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Terminated(stopped due to slow accrual)
An Extension to a Phase II Open-label Study to Determine the Safety and Anti-leukemic Effects of STI571 in Patients With Philadelphia Chromosome-positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Myeloid Blast Crisis [NCT00171158]Phase 2260 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-07-26Completed
A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Six Months Treatment With the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor STI571 for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) [NCT00477269]Phase 2/Phase 359 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
An Extension to a Phase II Study to Determine the Safety and Anti-Leukemic Effects of STI571 in Adult Patients With Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Leukemia Including Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, and Accelerated Phase Chronic Mye [NCT00171249]Phase 2293 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-08-09Completed
An Extension to QTI571A2301 to Evaluate the Long-term Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Oral QTI571 (Imatinib) in the Treatment of Severe Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: IMPRES Extension [NCT01117987]Phase 3144 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Novartis discontinued the development of imatinib in PAH due to requirement of regulatory authorities for additional data to secure marketing approval in PAH.)
A Phase 2 Study of Imatinib Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor [NCT05493215]Phase 228 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-30Not yet recruiting
A Phase II Study of CLAG Regimen in Combination With Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec) in Refractory or Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT00594555]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-11-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Principal Investigator resigned position with the University of Cincinnati, closing study at this site will reopen study in new position)
Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Flumatinib Versus Imatinib for in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML)-in Chronic Phase (CP): A Multicenter, Open-label, Real World Study [NCT05367765]Phase 42,400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-30Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Phase Lll Study of Imatinib Dose Optimization Compared With Nilotinib in Patients With Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia and Suboptimal Response to Standard-dose Imatinib [NCT00802841]Phase 3191 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
A Phase II Study Combining Targeted Therapy With Immunotherapy Using Imatinib Plus Peginterferon α-2b in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) Patients [NCT00585221]Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Terminated(stopped due to PI terminated at the recommendation of DSMC & IRB)
A Double-blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Dose Escalation Study to Examine the Efficacy and Microfilaricidal Kinetics and Safety of Imatinib for the Treatment of Loa Loa (A Pilot Study) [NCT02644525]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-16Terminated(stopped due to Planned interim analysis demonstrated futility of intervention)
Effect of Calcium Supplements on Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec®) Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Volunteers (CSTI571BUS 280) (UPCI 08-072) [NCT00732784]Phase 111 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
Effect of Imatinib on Suppression of Malaria Parasites in Patients With Uncomplicated Plasmodium Falciparum Malaria [NCT02614404]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-30Completed
Phase 2 Study to Assess the Safety and Efficiency of Pioglitazone in Combination With Imatinib Mesylate to Treat Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Patients [NCT02687425]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-02-29Not yet recruiting
A 28 Week, Treatment Randomized, Double -Blind, Placebo-controlled Study of the Effects of cKit Inhibition by Imatinib in Patients With Severe Refractory Asthma (KIA) [NCT01097694]Phase 2176 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
Targeted Therapy With Imatinib for Treatment of Poor Prognosis Mesenchymal-type Resectable Colon Cancer: a Proof-of-concept Study in the Preoperative Window Period. [NCT02685046]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Low accrual rate)
A Multi-arm Dose-finding Phase Ib Multicenter Study of Imatinib in Combination With the Oral Phosphatidyl-inositol 3-kinase (PI3-K) Inhibitor BKM120 in Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) Who Failed Prior Therapy With Imatinib and Sunitini [NCT01468688]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-20Completed
A Phase 1/2 Trial of Pembrolizumab in Combination With Imatinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Melanoma With c-KIT Mutation or Amplification [NCT02812693]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-04Withdrawn(stopped due to poor accrual)
An Open-Label, Multicenter, Expanded Access Study of Oral AMN 107 in Adult Patients With Imatinib (Glivec®/Gleevec®_ - Resistant or Intolerant Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Blast Crisis, Accelerated Phase or Chronic Phase [NCT00538109]8 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
Retrospective, Non-interventional Study to Evaluate Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatment Landscape and Real-life Treatment Outcomes in Hungary: Analysis of National Health Insurance Fund Database [NCT05286528]1,484 participants (Actual)Observational2020-11-18Completed
A Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of STI571 in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Hematologically or Cytogenetically Resistant or Refractory to Interferon-Alpha, or Intolerant of, Interferon-Alpha [NCT00006053]Phase 20 participants Interventional2000-06-30Completed
Ph I/II Study of PTK 787 (Vatalanib) and Gleevec (Imatinib) in Patients With Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML), Agnogenic Myeloid Metaplasia (AMM), and Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia- Blastic Phase (CML-BP) [NCT00088231]Phase 1/Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
A Phase I Trial of Imatinib, Bevacizumab, & Metronomic Cyclophosphamide as Antiangiogenic Therapy in Refractory Metastatic Solid Tumors [NCT00390156]Phase 135 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
A Phase IIA Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of A NCI-Supplied Agent: G3139 (NSC 683428, IND 58842) and Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With Refractory or Relapsed Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor [NCT00091078]Phase 296 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Terminated
A Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With Idiopathic Hypereosinophilic Syndrome [NCT00171860]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-09-30Terminated
Study Comparing Standard Dose and High-dose Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With Chronic Phase Ph+ CML [NCT00171899]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
Open-label Trial of Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With Unresectable Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme Expressing PDGFR (Platelet Derived Growth Factor Receptors) [NCT00171938]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Terminated
A Randomized, Open Label, Two-Treatment, Multiple Dose, Steady State, Two-period, Cross-over, Multi-Centre Comparative Bioequivalence Study of Imatinib Mesylate Tablet 400 mg of Amneal Pharmaceuticals, USA With GLEEVEC® (Imatinib Mesylate) Tablets 400 mg [NCT02103322]Phase 2/Phase 348 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Completed
An Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Phase II Trial Comparing the Depletion of Malignant Stem Cells With Dasatinib vs. Imatinib in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid [NCT00852566]Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
Phase II Explorative Study of Intermittent Imatinib (IM) Treatment (INTERIM) in Elderly Patients With Ph+ Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Who Achieved a Stable Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCgR) With Standard IM Therapy [NCT00858806]Phase 278 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
Imatinib Mesylate (Glivec) as Maintenance Therapy After Cytogenetic Response With Nilotinib (AMN107, Tasigna) First Line in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia [NCT01316250]25 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-08-31Recruiting
Prospective Non-randomized Stratified Study of REduction And DIscontinuation Treatment of TKI (Imatinib, Nilotinib, Dasatinib and Bosutinib) in Adults With Ph+ Chronic Myeloid Leukemia With Stable Deep Molecular Response [NCT04578847]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-15Active, not recruiting
Open Label, Pilot Phase II Study of Glivec in Children and Adolescents With Life Threatening Diseases Known to Be Associated With One or More Glivec-Sensitive Tyrosine Kinases [NCT00180830]Phase 236 participants Interventional2003-12-31Terminated
Phase II Trial of Gleevec (Imatinib Mesylate) and Taxotere (Docetaxel) as a Combined Regimen for Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma [NCT00209079]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Terminated 4/17/07. Drug sponsor withdrew.)
Phase II Study of Imatinib Mesylate in Chordoma [NCT00150072]Phase 255 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-31Completed
Phase I/II Study of Xeloda and Gleevec in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT00183833]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-12-31Completed
Protein-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (STI571) for Treatment of Patients With Ph+ Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Resistant to or Intolerant of *-Interferon. A Phase II Study [NCT00511303]Phase 2200 participants Interventional2000-08-31Completed
Protein-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (STI571) for Treatment of Patients With Ph+ Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Accelerated and Blastic Phase. A Phase II Study [NCT00514969]Phase 20 participants Interventional2000-08-31Completed
Phase II Trial to Study the Tolerability and the Effectiveness of Imatinib in Patients With Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase in Relapse After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT00219726]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2002-05-31Completed
Phase I/II Trial to Study the Dose, Tolerability and the Effectiveness of Imatinib in Combination With Daunorubicine and Cytarabine for Patients With Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Myeloid Acute Phase [NCT00219765]Phase 1/Phase 230 participants Interventional2001-05-31Terminated
Phase II Study of Gleevec and Taxotere in Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00222144]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
An Open Label, Multi-center Asciminib Roll-over Study to Assess Long-term Safety in Patients Who Have Completed a Novartis Sponsored Asciminib Study and Are Judged by the Investigator to Benefit From Continued Treatment [NCT04877522]Phase 4347 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-30Recruiting
Phase IIA Study of the Safety and Tolerability of the Use of Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec) in the Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis [NCT00555581]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
A Phase 2, Multi-center, Open-label, Randomized Study of Oral Asciminib Added to Imatinib Versus Continued Imatinib Versus Switch to Nilotinib in Patients With CML-CP Who Have Been Previously Treated With Imatinib and Have Not Achieved Deep Molecular Resp [NCT03578367]Phase 2104 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-11-22Recruiting
A Phase III Randomized, Open- Label Multi-center Study of Nilotinib Versus Imatinib in Adult Patients With Ph+ Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Who Have a Suboptimal Cytogenetic Response (CyR) on Imatinib [NCT00519090]Phase 36 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Terminated(stopped due to This study was terminated due to limited enrollment.)
Phase ll Study of Imatinib Mesylate for the Neoadjuvant Treatment of Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) [NCT01483014]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
A Phase II Multicentric Trial to Assess Efficacy and Toxicity of Imatinib in Adult Patients With Metastatic Ocular Melanoma [NCT00421317]Phase 213 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Study stopped at the end of the first step)
Effect of Antacids (Mg-Al-based) on Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec®) Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Volunteers (CSTI571BUS257) [NCT00446316]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
A Phase I Study of Imatinib Mesylate in Combination With Temozolomide in Patients With Malignant Glioma [NCT00354068]Phase 165 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
An Exploratory Study of the Effects of Imatinib on Allergic Inflammation Following Out of Allergy Season Repeated Nasal Allergen Challenge in Subjects With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Sensitive to Timothy Grass Pollen - an Exploratory Study of c-Kit Inhibi [NCT00426179]Phase 1/Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
An Open-label Multicenter Phase II Study of Imatinib Mesylate Treatment of Patients With Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors [NCT00427583]Phase 2/Phase 311 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Terminated(stopped due to stopped due to slow recruitment and no effect)
A Non-randomized, Open-label Study to Investigate the Effects of Imatinib Mesylate on the Pharmacokinetics of Acetaminophen/Paracetamol in Patients With Newly Diagnosed, Previously Untreated Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) [NCT00428909]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
An Extension to a Phase I Multicenter, Dose Escalation Study of Nilotinib in Combination With Imatinib on a Continuous Daily Dosing Schedule in Adult Patients With Imatinib-Resistant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) [NCT00441155]Phase 114 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
A Phase I Study of Capecitabine, Cisplatin and Imatinib in Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Gastric Cancer. [NCT00601510]Phase 138 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Nilotinib in Patients With a Chronic Disease of the Graft Against the Host (Graft Versus Host, GVH) Did Not Respond to Imatinib Mesylate. [NCT02891395]Phase 265 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-24Completed
Evaluation of the Persistence of the Complete Molecular Remission After Stopping Imatinib Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (STIM) [NCT00478985]100 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
Pilot Study of Imatinib Discontinuation in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia With Deep Molecular Response - Evaluation of Pioglitazone in Treatment-free Remission (EDI-PIO) [NCT02852486]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-22Active, not recruiting
A Phase Ib/II Study of MEK162 in Combination With Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With Untreated Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) [NCT01991379]Phase 1/Phase 275 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-30Active, not recruiting
Multicenter, Single-arm, Two Stage Phase II Trial of RAD001 (Everolimus) With Imatinib in Imatinib-resistant Patients With Progressive GIST [NCT00510354]Phase 428 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
"CML/021 A Phase II Exploratory Study of IMATINIB High Dose (800mg/gg) in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Intermediate Risk Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase" [NCT00510926]Phase 280 participants Interventional2004-01-31Completed
An Exploratory Phase II Study of the Combination of a Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (STI571) and a Pegylated Human Recombinant Interferon alfa2b (PEGINTRON) in the Treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase [NCT00511121]Phase 25 participants Interventional2001-04-30Terminated
A Phase 1b/2 Study of Imatinib in Combination With Everolimus in Synovial Sarcoma [NCT01281865]Phase 1/Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
A Multicentre, Open-label Phase II Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Ponatinib Induction Followed by Imatinib Maintenance in Adult Patients With Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) ≤ 65 Years [NCT04070443]Phase 2170 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-11-13Active, not recruiting
Follow-up of the Persistence of the Complete Molecular Remission After Stopping Imatinib Chronic Myeloid Leukemia [NCT02896829]97 participants (Actual)Observational2013-04-03Completed
Randomized, Multicentre, Phase II Study Evaluating the Interest of Imatinib Treatment Maintenance or Interruption After at Least 10 Years of Treatment in Patients With Locally Advanced/Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) [NCT05009927]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-03Recruiting
A Prospective Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating the Monitoring of Imatinib Mesylate (Glivec®) Plasmatic Through Level in Patients Newly Diagnosed With Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukaemia (CP-CML). [NCT02896842]Phase 2139 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
Positioning Imatinib for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension [NCT04416750]Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-20Active, not recruiting
Flumatinib Versus Imatinib Combined With Multiagent Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome-positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Prospective, Open-label,Randomized,Multi-center Clinical Trial [NCT05071482]Phase 4238 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-16Recruiting
Multicentric Phase II Study to Evaluate Feasibility and Efficacy of Association of Imatinib Mesylate and Zoledronic Acid in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia in Cytogenetic Response Without Molecular Response After One Year of Imatinib Mesylate Mono [NCT00210119]Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-12Terminated
A Phase II Study of Intermittent Gleevec® (Imatinib Mesylate) and Weekly Paclitaxel in Patients Aged 70 or Older With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT01011075]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
A Phase I Study of STI571 in Ph+ Leukemia [NCT00004932]Phase 131 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-01-31Completed
[NCT01271166]Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Terminated
A Phase I-II, Open-label Study of RAD001 in Combination With Glivec®/Gleevec™ (Imatinib) in Patients With Glivec/Gleevec-refractory/Resistant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors. [NCT01275222]Phase 1/Phase 2117 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-11-13Completed
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors of BCR/ABL: Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacogenetic Study in Patients Affected by Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. Evaluation of Efficacy and Tolerability [NCT01860456]412 participants (Anticipated)Observational2013-05-31Recruiting
Phase II Clinical Study of Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With Malignant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (Extension Study) [NCT00237172]Phase 272 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-09-30Completed
Phase I Study Of The Combination Of 17-AAG And Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec) In Patients With Blastic Phase, Accelerated Phase Of Chronic Mesylate Leukemia (CML) Or Patients With Chronic Phase CML Who Have Not Achieved A Cytogenetic Response With Imatinib M [NCT00066326]Phase 10 participants Interventional2003-06-30Completed
Phase II Trial of Imatinib Mesylate Maintenance Therapy in Patients With C-Kit (+) Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00248482]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-02-28Completed
A Phase II Study of Gleevec and Arsenic Trioxide in Patients With CML Who Fail to Achieve a Complete Response to Initial Gleevec Treatment [NCT00250042]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
A Phase II Trial of STI-571/Imatinib (Gleevec®) (NSC-716051) in Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Skin (Merkel Cell Carcinoma) [NCT00068783]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-31Completed
A Phase I Study of CLAG Regimen in Combination With Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec) in Refractory or Relapsed Leukemias [NCT00258271]Phase 118 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
A Phase I Study of CCI-779 in Combination With Imatinib Mesylate in Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia [NCT00101088]Phase 121 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Terminated
A Multi-Center Phase II Study of Nonmyeloablative Conditioning With TBI and Fludarabine for HLA-Matched Related Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic and Accelerated Phase [NCT00110058]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-02-28Completed
A Phase II Study on Preoperative Administration of Gleevec in Patients With Initially Non-Resectable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor [NCT00290485]Phase 250 participants Interventional2005-08-31Recruiting
Open-Label Trial of Neoadjuvant Imatinib Mesylate (Glivec) in Patients With Locally Advanced Malignant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) Expressing c-Kit or Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor-alpha [NCT00112632]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-02-28Completed
Phase 2 Study of Imatinib-Combined Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed BCR-ABL-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [NCT00130195]Phase 2100 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-09-30Completed
Vaccination for CML Patients With Persistent Disease on Imatinib Mesylate [NCT00301093]Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
Randomized Double-Blind Phase II Trial of Docetaxel and Imatinib Versus Docetaxel and Placebo in Metastatic Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer (AIPC) With Bone Metastases [NCT00080678]Phase 2116 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-05-31Completed
[NCT00081926]Phase 4112 participants Interventional2003-10-31Completed
A Phase I, Two Arm, Open-label, Randomized, Study to Investigate the Effect of Food on the Bioavailability of a Single 800 mg Imatinib Dose in Modified Release Formulations (MR3 and MR4) and Compare the Bioavailability Between MR3, MR4 and Imatinib 400 mg [NCT00420043]Phase 132 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
A Phase II Trial of Gemzar (Gemcitabine) and Gleevec (Imatinib Mesylate) in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT00323791]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-04-30Terminated(stopped due to slow accrual)
A Phase I-II, Study of RAD001 in Combination With Imatinib (Glivec®/Gleevec™) in Patients With Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML) in Chronic Phase Who Are Not In Complete Cytogenetic Response to Imatinib-Alone at Study Entry [NCT00093639]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants Interventional2004-08-31Completed
Phase II Study of Glivec (Imatinib) in Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcomas Expressing the t(17;22)(q22;q13) Translocation Resulting in a COL1A1/PDGF-beta Fusion Protein i.e. DermatoFibroSarcoma Protuberans (DFSP) and Giant Cell Fibrobl [NCT00085475]Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
Multicenter, Phase III Study Comparing Imatinib (STI571, Glivec®) Standard Dose (400 Mg/Day) With Imatinib High Dose Induction (800 Mg/Day) Followed by Standard Dose Maintenance (400 Mg/Day) in Pretreated CML Patients in Chronic Phase [NCT00327262]Phase 3240 participants Interventional2004-01-31Recruiting
Glivec (Imatinib Mesylate) in the Treatment of Polycythemia Vera [NCT00430066]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study of the Efficacy (Gleevec Imatinib Mesylate) in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis [NCT00131274]Phase 2/Phase 3120 participants Interventional2003-04-30Completed
Determination of the In-Tumor-Concentration of Imatinib Mesylate in Malignant Glioma After Oral Administration [NCT00401024]Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-12Completed
A Randomized Multi-Center Open Label Study of BMS-354825 vs Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec®) 800 mg/d in Subjects With Chronic Phase Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Have Disease That is Resistant to Iamtinib at a Dose of 400-600 [NCT00112775]Phase 20 participants Interventional2005-03-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase I/II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Toxicity of Imatinib Mesylate in Combination With Dacarbazine and Capecitabine in Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma [NCT00354523]Phase 1/Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Study closed following Phase I portion, insufficient activity to continue to Phase II.)
A Phase II Study of Everolimus in Combination With Imatinib in Metastatic Melanoma [NCT00402662]Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Terminated(stopped due to unexpected level of toxicity)
A Prospective, Randomized, Phase II Study of Preoperative Plus Postoperative Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec, Formerly STI-571) in Patients With Primary, Recurrent, or Metastatic Resectable, Kit-Expressing, Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) [NCT00500188]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-07-31Completed
A Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Tolerance of Combination Therapy of Imatinib Mesylate (IM) +-2A Interféron for Chronic Phase CML Patients Resistant or Refractory to IM Used as Single Therapy for at Least One Year [NCT00146913]Phase 230 participants Interventional2004-03-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase I Multicenter, Dose Escalation Study of AMN107 in Combination With Imatinib on a Continuous Daily Dosing Schedule in Adult Patients With Imatinib-resistant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) [NCT00135005]Phase 159 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Gleevec (Imatinib Mesylate) In Patients With BCR-Negative Myeloproliferative Disorders Including Patients With Idiopathic Myelofibrosis With Myeloid Dysplasia or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia [NCT00136409]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-05-31Completed
Evaluation of Imatinib (GLIVEC) After Induction Therapy in Patients Aged More Than 55 Years With Philadelphia Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (Ph+ ALL) : a Non Randomised, Controlled, Open, Multicentric, International Phase II Clinical Study (CSTI [NCT00149136]Phase 230 participants Interventional2002-08-31Active, not recruiting
Efficacy of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition in Reducing Eosinophilia in Patients With Myeloid and/or Steroid-Refractory Hypereosinophilic Syndrome [NCT00044304]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2002-09-26Recruiting
A Phase I Trial of Ipilimumab (Immunotherapy) and Imatinib Mesylate (c-Kit Inhibitor) in Patients With Advanced Malignancies [NCT01738139]Phase 168 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-19Active, not recruiting
Pilot Study of Gleevec/Imatinib Mesylate (STI-571, NSC 716051) in Neurofibromatosis (NF1) Patient With Plexiform Neurofibromas [NCT01140360]Phase 1/Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
A Therapeutic Trial of Bortezomib (Velcade), Vorinostat (SAHA) and Dexamethasone for Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) [NCT01312818]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual)
A Phase I-II Trial of Gleevec (Imatinib Mesylate) in Combination With Chlorambucil in Previously Treated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Patients [NCT00558961]Phase 1/Phase 213 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Unsatisfactory enrollment)
Post-Marketing Clinical Study of Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy With Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) [NCT00171977]Phase 464 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
A Randomized, Open-label, Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Nilotinib Versus Best Supportive Care With or Without a Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (Investigator's Choice) in Adult Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Resistant to Both Ima [NCT00471328]Phase 3248 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
Effect of a Proton Pump Inhibitor (Omeprazole, Prilosec®) on Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec®) Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Volunteers (CSTI571BUS258) [NCT00446004]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
Phase II Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial of'Imatinib Mesylate STI571 (Glivec®) Versus Placebo in Patients With Severe Cutaneous Scleroderma or Systemic Sclerosis With Severe Cutaneous Involvement. [NCT00479934]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Completed
A Phase III Study Comparing Imatinib Standard Dose (400 mg/Day) Versus Imatinib High Dose (800 mg/Day) in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed High Risk Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase [NCT00514488]Phase 30 participants Interventional2004-06-30Completed
A Pivotal Registrational Phase 3 Study of Olverembatinib Combined With Chemotherapy Versus Imatinib Combined With Chemotherapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome-positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Ph+ALL) [NCT06051409]Phase 3350 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-02Recruiting
A Proof of Concept Trial of Gleevec (Imatinib) in Active Diffuse Scleroderma [NCT01545427]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Frequent adverse events occurred early in treatment with poor tolerability.)
Intermediate and High Risk Localized, Completely Resected, Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) Expressing KIT Receptor: A Controlled Randomized Trial on Adjuvant Imatinib Mesylate (Glivec) Versus No Further Therapy After Complete Surgery [NCT00103168]Phase 3908 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-12-31Completed
Short (12 Months) Versus Long (36 Months) Duration of Adjuvant Treatment With the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Imatinib Mesylate of Operable GIST With a High Risk of Recurrence [NCT00116935]Phase 3400 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-02-29Completed
Open-label Trial of Glivec® (Imatinib Mesylate) in Patients With Primary or Recurrent Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans [NCT00122473]Phase 1/Phase 230 participants Interventional2004-01-31Completed
Phase III Randomized, Intergroup Trial Assessing the Clinical Activity Of STI-571 at Two Dose Levels in Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) Expressing the Kit Receptor Tyrosine Kinase (CD117) [NCT00009906]Phase 3748 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-12-31Terminated
A Phase II Study of Adjuvant STI571 (Gleevec TM) Therapy in Patients Following Completely Resected High-risk Primary GastroIntestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) [NCT00025246]Phase 289 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-09-30Completed
Phase II Trial of Gleevec (Imatinib Mesylate, STI-571) in Metastatic Melanoma [NCT00027586]Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-09-30Completed
Positive Ph Acute Lymphoblastic Leucemia With Intensive Induction Chemotherapy and Glivec, Before and After the Hematopoetic Progenitor Transplant [NCT00388895]Phase 235 participants Interventional2002-06-30Completed
A Phase II Study of Gleevec in Ph+ Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia [NCT00030394]Phase 264 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-09-30Completed
A Phase II Study of Gleevec (Imatinib Mesylate, NSC 716051 Formerly STI571) in Children With Refractory or Relapsed Solid Tumors [NCT00030667]Phase 2100 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-05-31Completed
Phase II Trial of Gleevec (Formerly Known as STI571) in Patients With Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcomas: A Multi-Disciplinary Trial of the North American Sarcoma Study Group of the Connective Tissue Oncology Society [NCT00031915]Phase 20 participants Interventional2002-06-30Completed
A Phase II Trial Of STI571 For The Treatment Of Platinum And Taxane Refractory Stage III And IV Epithelial Ovarian Cancer And Primary Peritoneal Cancer [NCT00036751]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-04-30Completed
Phase I Trial of Fixed Dose STI571 (Imatinib Mesylate) With Escalating Doses of Docetaxel in Patients With Metastatic Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer [NCT00038194]Phase 128 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-10-31Completed
A Phase I/II Trial of STI571 and High-Dose Cytarabine in Myeloid Blast Crisis of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia [NCT00015834]Phase 1/Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-05-31Completed
Open Label Phase II Study On STI571 (Glivec) Administered As A Daily Oral Treatment In Gliomas [NCT00039364]Phase 2112 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-03-31Completed
Phase I Study of Zarnestra (R115777.USA30) and Gleevec (Imatinib Mesylate) in Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML) [NCT00040105]Phase 126 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-10-31Completed
A Phase II Evaluation Of Gleevec (Imatinib Mesylate) (IND #61135, NSC #716051) In The Treatment Of Persistent Or Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Or Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma [NCT00041041]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-06-30Completed
A Phase III Randomized Double-Blind Study of Adjuvant STI571 (Gleevec™) Versus Placebo in Patients Following the Resection of Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) [NCT00041197]Phase 3732 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-06-30Completed
A Phase II Study Of Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec, Formerly Known As STI571; IND 61,135, NSC #716051) In Patients With Refractory Seminoma [NCT00042952]Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Administratively complete.)
A Phase I Study of Imatinib (Gleevec) in Combination With Irinotecan and Cisplatin in Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00045604]Phase 10 participants Interventional2002-07-31Completed
A PHASE II STUDY OF G3139 (GENASENSE™, NSC # 683428 IND # 58842) + IMATINIB MESYLATE (GLEEVEC®, STI571) IN PATIENTS WITH IMATINIB-RESISTANT CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA [NCT00049192]Phase 243 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2002-11-30Completed
A Phase I/II Study To Determine The Safety, Tolerability, And Anti-Leukemic Effects of Trisenox (Arsenic Trioxide) In Combination With Gleevec (STI571) In Patients With Resistant Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia In Chronic Phase [NCT00053248]Phase 1/Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-10-31Completed
Phase II Exploratory Study Of AG-858 Plus Gleevec™ In Patients With Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML) In Chronic Phase Who Are Cytogenetically Positive After Treatment With Gleevec™ [NCT00058747]Phase 240 participants Interventional2003-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Business decision of the sponsor)
Phase I Study Of Flavopiridol In Combination With Imatinib Mesylate (STI571, Gleevec) In Bcr/Abl+ Hematological Malignancies [NCT00064285]Phase 122 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
A Phase I Study Of Weekly Taxotere (Docetaxel) And Gleevec (STI571, Imatinib Mesylate, CGP 57148B) In Locally Advanced Or Metastatic Breast Cancer [NCT00080665]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-31Completed
A Phase I/II Study to Determine Safety and Efficacy of Arsenic Trioxide (Trisneox™) in Combination With Imatinib (STI571, Gleevec™) in Patients With Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Accelerated or Blastic Phase Disease or Ph+ Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [NCT00081133]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants Interventional2003-12-31Completed
Phase I/II Trial of STI571 (NSC 716051) in Patients With Recurrent Malignant Gliomas [NCT00010049]Phase 1/Phase 2105 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-02-27Completed
A Phase I/II Trial of STI-571 and Chemotherapy in Lymphoid Blast Crisis of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia and Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoid Leukemia [NCT00015860]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants Interventional2001-05-31Completed
A Children's Oncology Group Pilot Study for the Treatment of Very High Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Children and Adolescents (Imatinib (STI571, GLEEVEC) NSC#716051) [NCT00022737]Phase 3220 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-10-31Completed
A Phase I Pharmacokinetic Study of STI571 in Patients With Advanced Malignancies and Varying Degrees of Renal Dysfunction for the CTEP-Sponsored Organ Dysfunction Working Group [NCT00026169]Phase 169 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2001-09-30Completed
Open Label Pilot Phase II Study of STI571 in the Treatment of Patients With Idiopathic Hypereosinophilic Syndrome (HES) and Eosinophilic Leukemias [NCT00276926]Phase 20 participants Interventional2003-03-31Recruiting
Phase II Study Of Gleevec (Imatinib Mesylate Formerly Known As(STI571) (NSC #716051) In Patients With Colorectal Cancer Stage IV [NCT00041340]Phase 237 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-05-31Completed
Phase II Clinical Trial With Proteomic Profiling Of Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec; STI571), A PDGFR And C-Kit Inhibitor, In Patients With Refractory Or Relapsed Epithelial Ovarian Cancer, Fallopian Tube And Primary Peritoneal Cancer [NCT00039585]Phase 20 participants Interventional2002-05-31Completed
Intensive Induction Therapy for Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Who Experience a Bone Marrow Relapse [NCT00049569]126 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2003-01-31Completed
A Phase I Study Of STI 571 (Gleevec) In Combination With Cisplatin/Irinotecan In Patients With Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00052494]Phase 19 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-30Completed
A Phase I Pharmacokinetic Study of STI571 in Patients With Advanced Malignancies and Varying Levels of Liver Dysfunction [NCT00025415]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-08-31Completed
A Dose-ranging Phase I/II Study of STI571 in Combination With Cytarabin in Patients With First Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia [NCT00028847]Phase 1/Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2001-04-30Active, not recruiting
Phase II Trial of Gleevec (STI571) in Therapy of Ewing's Family of Tumors and Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumors [NCT00062205]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2002-06-30Completed
A Phase II Study Of Gleevec (Imatinib Mesylate Formerly Known as STI-571) In Patients With Myelofibrosis [NCT00039416]Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-04-30Completed
Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec®, STI571) in Combination With Docetaxel (Taxotere) for the Treatment of Advanced, Platinum-Refractory Ovarian Cancer and Primary Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: Hoosier Oncology Group GYN03-62 [NCT00216112]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-31Completed
A Phase III Prospective Randomized Comparison of Imatinib at a Dose of 400mg in Combination With Peg-Interferon-alpha2a (Peg-IFNa2a) or Cytarabine (Ara-C)Versus Imatinib at a Dose of 600mg Versus Imatinib a Dose of 400mg for Previously Untreated Chronic M [NCT00219739]Phase 3789 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-09-30Completed
Phase I Trial of Cisplatin, Pemetrexed, and Imatinib Mesylate in Unresectable or Metastatic Malignant Mesothelioma [NCT00402766]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
Phase II Trial of STI571 in Metastatic Breast Cancer [NCT00045188]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-08-31Completed
A Phase I Study of the Inhibition of Platelet Derived Growth Factor Using Imatinib Mesylate Combined With Intravitreal Ranibizumab in the Treatment of Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration [NCT00403156]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Lack of recruitment)
A Phase II Open Label Study to Determine Safety and Efficacy of Interferon-alpha in Combination With Imantinib Mesylate (Gleevec) in Patients With Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Who Have Not Achieved a Complete Cytogenetic Response to Gleevec [NCT00045422]Phase 20 participants Interventional2002-04-30Completed
Randomized Trial of Therapy of Early Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia With High-Dose Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec) Alone or in Combination With Peg-Alpha Interferon (PEG-Intron) and Sargramostim (GM-CSF) [NCT00050531]Phase 394 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-30Completed
3-Month, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety & Tolerability of Imatinib 400 mg Daily in Combination With Methotrexate (MTX)Compared to MTX Alone in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). [NCT00154336]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
Phase II Trial of Gleevec (Imatinib Mesylate, STI571) Maintenance Therapy After Induction Irinotecan and Cisplatin in Patients With C-Kit Positive, Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00156286]Phase 220 participants Interventional2002-03-31Completed
The Possible Role of Glivec in Patients With Tumor Cells Positive for C-kit or Platelet Derived Growth Factor Receptor (PDGFR); a Multi Center Study. [NCT00159016]Phase 2100 participants Interventional2002-08-31Withdrawn(stopped due to the PI is no longer work at Hadassah)
Phase II Trial of STI571 in Patients With Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00052949]Phase 291 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2003-05-31Completed
Phase II Study of Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec, STI-571) (NSC#716051) and Decitabine (5-AZA-2'-Deoxycitidine) (NSC#127716), in Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Accelerated and Blastic Phases [NCT00054431]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-01-31Completed
A Phase 2 Study Of Imatinib Mesylate In Adenoid Cystic, Lymphoepithelioma-Like And Myoepithelial Salivary Gland Carcinomas [NCT00045669]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-07-31Completed
Treatment Optimization Trial in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) - Randomized Controlled Comparison of Imatinib vs. Imatinib/Interferon-alpha vs. Imatinib/Low-Dose AraC vs. Interferon-alpha Standard Therapy and Determination of the Role of Allografting in N [NCT00055874]Phase 31,551 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-06-30Completed
Phase I Study of Lonafarnib (SCH66336) and Gleevec (Imatinib Mesylate) in Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML) [NCT00047502]Phase 123 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-11-01Completed
Phase I of Trastuzumab and Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec®, Formerly Known as STI-571) in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Her-2/Neu Expressing Cancer [NCT00084513]Phase 118 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-08-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Imatinib (NSC-716051) in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans [NCT00084630]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-05-31Completed
Crossover From Docetaxel and Placebo to Docetaxel and Imatinib in Patients With Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer With Bone Metastases: Extension Trial to ID03-0008 [NCT00084825]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-05-31Completed
A Randomized, Multicenter Open Label Phase II Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of Induction Therapy With Imatinib in Comparison With Standard Induction Chemotherapy in Elderly (> 55 Years) Patients With Ph Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ( [NCT00199186]Phase 20 participants Interventional2002-03-31Recruiting
Therapy of Early Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML) With Gleevec (STI571) [NCT00048672]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-03-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Imatinib Mesylate Plus Hydroxyurea in the Treatment of Patients With Recurrent/Progressive Meningioma [NCT00354913]Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
Phase II Study of Imatinib Mesylate and Docetaxel in Patients With Metastatic or Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer [NCT00485485]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Open-label Trial of Imatinib in Patients With Desmoid Tumor and Chondrosarcoma [NCT00928525]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
Protocol Number: HJKC3-0003. Treatment Free Remission After Combination Therapy With Asciminib (ABL001) Plus Imatinib in Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CP-CML) Patients Who Relapsed After a Prior Attempt at TKI Discontinuation [NCT04838041]Phase 251 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-11Recruiting
Prospective, Phase II, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Baricitinib, Imatinib or Supportive Treatment in Patients With SARS Cov2 Pneumonia [NCT04346147]Phase 2168 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-05-07Active, not recruiting
Phase II Trial Of Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec®) (NSC-716051) In Combination With Capecitabine (Xeloda®) (NSC-712807) In Metastatic Breast Cancer [NCT00087152]Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-30Completed
An Open-Label Randomized Phase III Study of Dasatinib vs. High-Dose (600 mg) Imatinib Mesylate in the Treatment of Subjects With Chronic Phase Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Imatinib Failures or Who Have Had a Suboptimal [NCT00362466]Phase 33 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Insufficient Enrollment)
Bioequivalence Study of Mesylate Imatinib Capsule in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Body [NCT01795716]Phase 121 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
Phase III Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Dose Adjustment of IM on the Molecular Response in Patients With LMC in Chronic Phase Treated With IM 400 mg / Day for at Least Two Years, Complete Cytogenetic Response for at Least One Year [NCT01827930]Phase 368 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Difficulties of enrolment of Patient)
Phase II Trial of Docetaxel Plus Imatinib Mesylate in Metastatic Breast Cancer [NCT00193180]Phase 237 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
Efficacy, Safety and Long-term Prognosis of Imatinib in Patients Newly Diagnosed With Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (Chronic Phase) [NCT00237120]Phase 3100 participants Interventional2002-11-30Completed
An Extension to a Phase II Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of STI571 in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Refractory to or Intolerant of Interferon-Alpha [NCT00171223]Phase 2532 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-12-06Completed
Exploring the Molecular Mechanism of Secondary Resistance to Imatinib in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Based on KIT Mutation [NCT05895942]190 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2021-09-10Recruiting
A Multicenter Pilot Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib as Post-Transplant Therapy for High- Risk Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Leukemias [NCT00244829]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants Interventional2004-01-31Completed
A Phase I Dose Escalation Study of Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec/STI571) Plus Capecitabine (Xeloda) in Advanced Solid Tumor Malignancies [NCT00253565]Phase 125 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-08-31Completed
An Open-label Trial of Glivec in Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Malignant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Expressing C-kit. [NCT00293124]Phase 3125 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-31Completed
Open-label Trial of Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With Refractory Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumors (DSRCT) Expressing PDGF-R [NCT00417807]Phase 1/Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
A Phase I Trial of Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec, Formerly Known as STI571) in Combination With Daunorubicin and Cytarabine for C-kit Positive Relapsed AML [NCT00268229]Phase 121 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-07-31Completed
[NCT00297570]Phase 390 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-02-28Recruiting
Phase I/II Study of Gleevec (Imatinib Mesylate, Formerly Known as STI571) and Gemcitabine for Advanced Pancreas Cancer [NCT00281996]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Closed to accrual to allow enrollment on another more promising trial.)
Multicentric Phase I/II Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Toxicity of Imatinib in Adult Patients With Aggressive Fibromatosis That Cannot be Treated by Surgery or Curative Radiotherapy [NCT00287846]Phase 1/Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
Young Adult With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) : a Multicentric Protocol. GRAALL 2005 : T ALL or B ALL Non Ph GRAALL 2005 R : B ALL Non Ph CD20+ GRAAPH 2005 : ALL Ph [NCT00327678]Phase 31,080 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
Phase II Trial of Gleevec and Low-Dose Ara-C for Elderly Patients With C-Kit Positive Acute Myeloid Leukemia and High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT00451997]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-31Completed
Pilot Study of Imatinib (Gleevec) as Treatment for Advanced Thymic Carcinoma [NCT00314873]Phase 111 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
Phase II Study of Flumatinib Versus Imatinib in Adult Patients With Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome Positive (Ph+) Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) [NCT01503502]Phase 2150 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Active, not recruiting
An Open-label, Randomized, Single Dose, Crossover Phase I Clinical Trial to Compare Pharmacokinetic Property of SYO-1126 and Glivec Film Coated Tab., 4T (400mg) in Healthy Male Volunteers [NCT01504984]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
A Phase 3 Multinational, Multi-center, Open-Label, Randomized Study of the Efficacy of Radotinib Versus Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Ph+ CML Patients in Early Chronic Phase [NCT01511289]Phase 3242 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
Imatinib for the Treatment of SARS-COV-2 Induced Pneumonia: A Pilot Study [NCT04422678]Phase 330 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-30Not yet recruiting
A Randomized, Open-label, Single Dose, 2-Treatment, 2-Period, 2-Way Crossover Study to Assess Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Megavec 400 mg (Imatinib Mesylate) Under Fasted Conditions in Healthy Male Subjects [NCT01653314]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
A Multicentre, Randomized Trial in Adults With de Novo Philadelphia-Chromosome Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia to Assess the Efficacy of Ponatinib Versus Imatinib in Combination With Low-intensity Chemotherapy, to Compare End of Therapy With Indicat [NCT06061094]Phase 2220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-14Recruiting
Treatment Protocol for Newky Diagnosed Adult Ph-Chromosome Positive (BCR::ABL1) Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (LALPh2022) [NCT06175702]150 participants (Anticipated)Observational2023-12-25Not yet recruiting
A Randomized, Open-label, Single-dose, Crossover Clinical Trial to Compare the Pharmacokinetics of Imatinib Mesylate Tablet 400 mg (1 Tablet) and Glivec Film-coated Tablet 100 mg (4 Tablets) After Oral Administration in Healthy Male Subjects (Phase I) [NCT01751919]Phase 137 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
A Phase II Randomized Study of Imatinib Versus High Dose Interferon as Adjuvant Therapy in KIT-mutated Patients With Resected Melanoma [NCT01782508]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-08-31Recruiting
A Trial of De-escalation and Stopping Treatment in Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia Patients With Excellent Responses to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy [NCT01804985]Phase 2168 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-12-31Active, not recruiting
Low-dose Nilotinib and Imatinib Combination in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients, With Failure, Suboptimal Response or Treatment Intolerance. [NCT01819389]Phase 310 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
A Prospective, Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Trial of Imatinib Re-Challenge in Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Who Had Benefit From Prior Imatinib But Progression From Both Imatinib and Sunitinib [NCT01151852]Phase 381 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
A Phase Ib/II Study of BGJ398 in Combination With Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With Untreated Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) [NCT02257541]Phase 1/Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-02Completed
STI 571 (GLIVEC) in the Treatment of Philadelphia-chromosome Positive and/or BCR/ABL Rearranged Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. GIMEMA LAL 0201. [NCT00376467]Phase 2105 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-12-31Completed
A Phase 1/2 Study of SNDX-275 in Combination With Imatinib for Relapsed/Refractory Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [NCT01383447]Phase 1/Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Terminated(stopped due to This study was halted prematurely by the NCI for low accrual.)
Three Versus Five Years of Adjuvant Imatinib as Treatment of Patients With Operable GIST With a High Risk for Recurrence: A Randomised Phase III Study [NCT02413736]Phase 3255 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Active, not recruiting
The Long-term Efficacy of Imatinib With Hepatic Resection or Other Local Treatment for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours Liver Metastases:a Retrospective Cohort Study [NCT06038552]238 participants (Actual)Observational2002-01-01Completed
A Phase III, Prospective Randomised Comparison of Imatinib (STI571, Glivec/Gleevec) 400mg Daily Versus Dasatinib 100mg in Patients With Newly-diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia [NCT01460693]Phase 3814 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
Open Label Phase II Randomized Trial of Tasigna (Nilotinib) 400 mg Twice Daily Alone or in Combination With Gleevec (Imatinib Mesylate) 400 mg Daily for Patients With Advanced GIST That Have Progressed on High Dose Imatinib [NCT01089595]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Novartis is ending their research program for Nilotinib in GIST.)
Open-label, Randomized, Single-dose, 2-way Crossover Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics(Cmax, Auc) of CJ Imatinib Mesylate Tablet 200mg x 1 Compared With Gleevec Film-coated Tablet 100mg x 2 in Healthy Male Volunteers [NCT01926548]Phase 128 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
A Phase II Pilot Study to Determine the Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec) in Patients With Myelofibrosis With Myeloid Metaplasia [NCT00245128]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Per PI, results from another similar study were published prior to study analysis. Negative study results were published therefore analysis was not completed)
A Phase II Study To Determine The Anti-Leukemic Effects Of STI571 In Combination With Ara-C In Patients With Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia In Chronic Phase [NCT00022490]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-06-30Terminated
A Randomized Multi-Center Open Label Study of BMS-354825 vs. Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec) 800 mg/d in Subjects With Chronic Phase Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Have Disease That is Resistant to Imatinib at a Dose at 400 - 60 [NCT00103844]Phase 2150 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-02-28Completed
Potential of Immunotherapy to Convert a Complete Cytogenetic Remission in Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia to a Molecular Complete Remission: Randomized Phase II Study of Proteinase 3 PR1 Peptide Mixed With Montanide ISA-51 VG Adjuvant and Administered With G [NCT00415857]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Vaccine sponsor ceased operations.)
An Open-label, Phase II Study to Explore the Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib With Chemotherapy in Pediatric Patients With Ph+ / BCR-ABL+ Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Ph+ALL) [NCT00287105]Phase 249 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
Hyper-CVAD With Liposomal Vincristine (Hyper-CMAD) in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [NCT01319981]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-05Completed
Open-label, Multicenter Phase II Study of Combination Therapy of Imatinib Mesylate and Mycophenolate Mofetil in Children With Steroid-Refractory Sclerotic/Fibrotic Type Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease [NCT01898377]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Terminated(stopped due to New treatment option introduced for patients with the study indication)
Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial on the Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults With COVID-19 [NCT04394416]Phase 3204 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-02Active, not recruiting
A Phase I/II Dose-Finding Study to Determine the Safety, Tolerability, and Anti-Leukemic Effects of STI571 (NSC 716051) in Combination With Interferon-alpha in Patients With Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase [NCT00015847]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-04-30Terminated
A Pilot Phase II Trial of a Synthetic Tumor-Specific Breakpoint Peptide Vaccine in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) and Minimal Residual Disease [NCT00267085]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
A Phase I Dose Escalation Trial to Determine if Imatinib Treatment Restores Sodium Iodide Symporter Function and Sensitivity to Radioiodine Treatment in Metastatic Thyroid Cancer Patients [NCT03469011]Phase 118 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-09-18Recruiting
Study of a Short Course of Neoadjuvant Gleevec (Imatinib Mesylate) in Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans [NCT00243191]Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Imatinib and Docetaxel in Metastatic Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer [NCT00251225]Phase 249 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
A Phase III Randomized Open-label Multi-center Study of Ruxolitinib vs. Best Available Therapy in Patients With Corticosteroid-refractory Chronic Graft vs Host Disease After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation (REACH3) [NCT03112603]Phase 3330 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-29Completed
IMatinib for PAin in Chronic Treatment of Sickle Cell Anemia (IMPACT SCA): A Pilot Study of Imatinib in Patients With Sickle Cell Anemia and Recurrent Vaso-occlusive Pain [NCT03997903]Phase 1/Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-02-26Recruiting
A Therapeutic Trial of Decitabine and Vorinostat in Combination With Chemotherapy (Vincristine, Prednisone, Doxorubicin and PEG-Asparaginase) for Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) or Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (LL) [NCT00882206]Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual)
A Pilot Study of Treatment of Adults With Sickle Cell Disease Associated Pulmonary Hypertension Based on Hemodynamic Stratification: Safety and Tolerability Study of Imatinib and Carvedilol [NCT01568645]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-02Withdrawn
Validation of Digital-PCR Analysis Through Programmed Imatinib Interruption in PCR Negative CML Patients (ISAV) [NCT01578213]Phase 4112 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-09Completed
Continuation of Drug Supply in Chinese Patients After CAMN107DBR01study Termination [NCT01613053]0 participants Expanded AccessNo longer available
Dasatinib in Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia or Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemic Subjects Who Are Experiencing Clinical Benefit on Current START or CA180-039 Protocols: Long Term Safety and Efficacy Analysis [NCT00982488]Phase 2238 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
Allogeneic Nonmyeloablative Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant for Patients With BCR-ABL Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Responsive Ph+ Acute Leukemia ? A Multi-center Trial [NCT00036738]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-07-13Completed
Phase II Study of Hyper-CVAD Plus Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec, STI571) for Philadelphia-Positive Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia [NCT00038610]Phase 254 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-03-31Completed
A Phase I Dose Escalation Study of the Combination of Dasatinib (BMS-354825) and Imatinib in Subjects With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase [NCT00324077]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Insufficient Enrollment)
A Phase II Study Evaluating a Maintenance Strategy of Gleevce® (Imatinib Mesylate) and Bevacizumab in Patients With Advanced, Non-squamous, Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, Following Completion of First-line Chemotherapy With Bevacizumab [NCT00425646]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
Apatinib Mesylate Versus Standard Second-line TKI in the Treatment of Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: a Randomized, Open, Controlled, Single-center Clinical Study [NCT05751733]258 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-01Recruiting
A Phase I - II Open Label Study of the Maximum Tolerated Dose, Safety and Efficacy of Docetaxel and Cisplatin Plus STI571 in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT02127372]Phase 1/Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-30Terminated(stopped due to The study was closed due to poor accrual)
An Open-label Multi-center Study of Imatinib and Nilotinib in CAMN107ECN02 On-treatment Patients With Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase After the End of CAMN107ECN02 Core Study [NCT02272777]Phase 3225 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-17Completed
Phase II Study of Imatinib Mesylate and Gemcitabine for First-line Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer [NCT00161213]Phase 244 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
A Phase I, Open-label, Randomized, Crossover Study to Investigate the Effect of Food on the Bioavailability of a Single 800 mg Imatinib Dose in a Modified Release Formulation (MR2) and Compare the Bioavailability Between MR2 and Imatinib 400 mg Twice Dail [NCT00422825]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
Use of Imatinib to Convert Triple Negative Breast Cancer Into ER-positive Breast Cancer [NCT05722795]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-06Not yet recruiting
Use and Tolerability of Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec®) in Patients With Philadelphia-Positive Chronic Myeloid or Acute Leukemia During the First 100 Days Following Bone Marrow or Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT00386373]10 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-08-31Completed
A Prospective Multicentric Randomized Study of Glivec® in Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Expressing C-kit Comparing Treatment Interruption After 5 Years vs Treatment Maintenance [NCT00367861]Phase 3564 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-05-31Completed
Open-label Trial of Imatinib in Combination With Vinorelbine for Patients With Advanced Breast Carcinoma: ICON [NCT00372476]Phase 433 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
A Phase II Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Induction-Maintenance Protocol for Patients With Chronic-Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukaemia [NCT03241199]Phase 215 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-08-01Recruiting
First-Line Dasatinib or Nilotinib Followed by Response Guided Switch to Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia [NCT02709083]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Original principal investigator left institution)
Open-labeled, Multicenter, Phase I/II Study of Imatinib Combined With ESHAP as Salvage Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT02431403]Phase 1/Phase 294 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-02-28Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Imatinib Mesylate in Children and Adults With Sclerotic Skin Changes of Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease [NCT00702689]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-15Completed
The MATRIX Clinical Studies of Precision Cancer Therapy for Rare Cancers [NCT06119789]Phase 296 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-30Not yet recruiting
Phase II Study of Gleevec/Imatinib Mesylate (STI-571, NCS 716051) in Neurofibromatosis (NF1) Patients With Plexiform Neurofibromas [NCT01673009]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
An Open Label, Randomized (2:1) Phase IIb Study of Dasatinib Versus Imatinib in Patients With Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Have Not Achieved an Optimal Response to 3 Months of Therapy With 400 mg Imatinib [NCT01593254]Phase 2262 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-12Completed
Phase II Study of Imatinib Mesylate Plus Hydroxyurea in the Treatment of Patients With Recurrent / Progressive Grade II Low-Grade Glioma [NCT00615927]Phase 264 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
A Non-Randomized, Multiple Dose, Three Treatment Period, Open-Label, Single Sequence, Single Group Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetic Effect of Two Doses of QTI571 (Imatinib) on the Co-administered Drugs Sildenafil and Bosentan in Pulmonary Arterial Hy [NCT01392469]Phase 321 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-20Completed
Phase II Study of Imatinib Mesylate as Adjuvant Treatment in High-relapse Risk Localized Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors With C-kit Mutation [NCT00278876]Phase 247 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
A Phase II Study of CLAG Regimen in Combination With Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec) in Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT00955916]Phase 238 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
Frontline Asciminib Combination in Chronic Phase CML [NCT03906292]Phase 2125 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-19Active, not recruiting
A Phase I/II Study Of Imatinib Mesylate And Bevacizumab In Patients With Advanced Melanoma And Other Advanced Cancers [NCT00074308]Phase 1/Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-31Completed
A Phase I/II Trial of Bevacizumab (Avastin), Erlotinib (Tarceva), and Imatinib (Gleevec) in the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT00193258]Phase 1/Phase 294 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-30Completed
Phase II Study of Imatinib Mesylate and Gemcitabine for Recurrent/Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) [NCT00323362]Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Toxicity)
A Phase II Study of Intermittent Gleevec® (Imatinib Mesylate) and Weekly Paclitaxel in Patients Aged 70 or Older With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00408460]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
Phase II Study of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL): Imatinib in Combination With Chemotherapy in Ph+ Patients, and Post-remissional Treatment Intensification in High-risk Ph- Patients, With Minimal Residual Disease Monitoring. [NCT00458848]Phase 2470 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-31Completed
An Open-label Extension Study to CQTI571A2102 to Evaluate the Long-term Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of QTI571 (Imatinib) in the Treatment of Severe Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension [NCT01392495]Phase 317 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Novartis discontinued the development of imatinib in PAH due to requirement of regulatory authorities for additional data to secure marketing approval in PAH.)
A Dose Calibration and Dose Equivalence Pharmacokinetic Study in Healthy Volunteers Comparing IkT-001Pro to Imatinib Mesylate 400mg [NCT05623774]Phase 164 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-16Recruiting
Open Label, Randomized, Single-dose, Crossover Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of Luckyvec 400mg Tablet, in Healthy Subjects [NCT01270984]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
ENESTChina: A Phase III Multi-center, Open-label, Randomized Study of Nilotinib Versus Imatinib in Chinese Adult Patients With Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome Positive (Ph+) Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) [NCT01275196]Phase 3267 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
A Phase II Trial of Gleevec and Gemzar in Patients With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Who Have Failed at Least Two Prior Therapies [NCT00928642]Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Observational Study in Adult Patients With Imatinib-resistant or Intolerant Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Treated With Nilotinib: Follow-up of the Italian Patients. GIMEMA Study CML0609 [NCT01475110]19 participants (Actual)Observational2012-09-13Completed
Imatinib Discontinuation in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Chronic Phase With Sustained MR4log [NCT03239886]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-15Active, not recruiting
Platform Study of Genotyping Guided Precision Medicine for Rare Tumors in China [NCT04423185]Phase 2770 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-08-15Not yet recruiting
Discontinuation of Imatinib in Patients With Oligo-metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor That Has Become Radiologically Undetectable With Treatment [NCT02924714]31 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-31Suspended(stopped due to Slow accrual)
Phase I Study of Imatinib, Gemcitabine and Capecitabine in Patients With Solid Tumors [NCT00483366]Phase 113 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-15Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Preserving Beta-Cell Function in New-Onset Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT01781975]Phase 267 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Study Comparing Ponatinib Versus Imatinib, Administered in Combination With Reduced-Intensity Chemotherapy, in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Ph+ [NCT03589326]Phase 3245 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-04Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of the Combination of Gemcitabine and Imatinib Mesylate in Pemetrexed-pretreated Patients With Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma [NCT02303899]Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Imatinib Mesylate as First-line Treatment for the Patients With Chronic Phase of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia [NCT02317159]Phase 490 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-02-28Not yet recruiting
Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study to Compare Pathologic Type, NIH and WHO Criteria, and Mechanism of GIST Malignant Transformation [NCT03381053]3,000 participants (Anticipated)Observational2017-07-01Recruiting
A Phase IIb Study of Molecular Responses to Imatinib, at Standard or Increased Doses, or Dasatinib (BMS-354825) (NSC-732517) for Previously Untreated Patients With Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML) in Chronic Phase [NCT00070499]Phase 2406 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-08-15Active, not recruiting
A MULTICENTER PHASE 3 RANDOMIZED, OPEN-LABEL STUDY OF BOSUTINIB VERSUS IMATINIB IN ADULT PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED CHRONIC PHASE CHRONIC MYELOGENOUS LEUKEMIA [NCT02130557]Phase 3536 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-15Completed
A Phase 1 Study of TAS-116 (Pimitespib) in Combination With Imatinib in Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor [NCT05245968]Phase 178 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-01Recruiting
A Multicenter Phase I/II Study of the Prophylactic Inhibition of BCR-ABL Tyrosine Kinase by Tasigna ® (Nilotinib) After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Leukemias. [NCT00702403]Phase 1/Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-14Completed
A Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Study to Investigate the Effects of the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Imatinib on Pulmonary Vascular Dysfunction in a Human Experimental Model of Acute Lung Injury [NCT03328117]Phase 147 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-13Completed
Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study of Neoadjuvant Imatinib Mesylate for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors [NCT04933669]Phase 2122 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-07Recruiting
A Phase II Trial of Imatinib for Patients With Aggressive Desmoid Tumor (Aggressive Fibromatosis) [NCT02495519]Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
Observational Study of Cemivil® (Imatinib) in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients in Jordan [NCT02977312]91 participants (Actual)Observational2012-08-31Completed
A Phase 3 Randomized,Open-Label Study of Ponatinib Versus Imatinib in Adult Patients With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase [NCT01650805]Phase 3307 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Study terminated based on evaluation of safety data.)
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00015847 (3) [back to overview]Treatment-related Toxicity (i.e., Grade 3 or 4 Nonhematologic Toxicity) as Measured by NCI CTCAE v3.0 (Phase I)
NCT00015847 (3) [back to overview]Major Cytogenetic Response After 6 and 12 Months of Treatment.
NCT00015847 (3) [back to overview]Complete Cytogenetic Response at 6 and 12 Months (Phase II)
NCT00021229 (9) [back to overview]Peak Concentration (Cmax)
NCT00021229 (9) [back to overview]Pre-treatment Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor Values From Plasma
NCT00021229 (9) [back to overview]Pre-treatment Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor Values From Urine
NCT00021229 (9) [back to overview]Pre-treatment Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor From Urine
NCT00021229 (9) [back to overview]Pre-treatment Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Values From Plasma
NCT00021229 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Volume FLAIR at Two Weeks After Completion of Radiation
NCT00021229 (9) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival
NCT00021229 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants in Phase I Stratum I With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) Observed During First 8 Weeks (Courses 1 and 2) of Imatinib Therapy
NCT00021229 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants in Phase I Stratum II With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) Observed During First 8 Weeks (Courses 1 and 2) of Imatinib Therapy
NCT00022490 (1) [back to overview]The Rate of Major Cytogenetic Response at 6 Months
NCT00028002 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Major Toxicity (Toxicity Grade ≥ 3)
NCT00028002 (4) [back to overview]FDG-PET as Biological Marker of Metabolic Response(MR) During Imatinib Mesylate (IM) Treatment, in Patients With GIST Who Are naı¨ve to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy
NCT00028002 (4) [back to overview]Rate of Disease Progression at 2 Years
NCT00028002 (4) [back to overview]Rates of Objective Response (Complete, Partial, and Stable)
NCT00036738 (5) [back to overview]Transplant-related Mortality
NCT00036738 (5) [back to overview]Relapse Free Survival
NCT00036738 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00036738 (5) [back to overview]Leukemia-free Survival
NCT00036738 (5) [back to overview]Transplant-related Mortality
NCT00038610 (3) [back to overview]Response To Induction Therapy With Hyper-CVAD Plus Imatinib Mesylate
NCT00038610 (3) [back to overview]Disease-Free Survival Rate at 2-year and 5-year.
NCT00038610 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival Rate at 2-year and 5-year.
NCT00038649 (2) [back to overview]Participant Complete Hematologic Remission (CHR) Classified
NCT00038649 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Molecular Response of Complete or Partial Hematologic Remission
NCT00038675 (3) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT00038675 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Complete Response (CR)
NCT00038675 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00039377 (5) [back to overview]5 Year Disease-free Survival for Autologous & Allogeneic Transplant Groups
NCT00039377 (5) [back to overview]5 Year Overall Survival for Autologous & Allogeneic Transplant Groups
NCT00039377 (5) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival
NCT00039377 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00039377 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Achieved a BCR-ABL Response at 12 Months
NCT00045734 (6) [back to overview]Concentration (Steady State) of Imatinib During Cycle One (Pharmacokinetics)
NCT00045734 (6) [back to overview]Tumor Response as Assessed by MRI Using Macdonald Criteria
NCT00045734 (6) [back to overview]Toxicity as Assessed by the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) Version 2.0
NCT00045734 (6) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival According to Response Evaluation Using Macdonald Criteria
NCT00045734 (6) [back to overview]Determine Survival for Patients Treated With Imatinib Mesylate
NCT00045734 (6) [back to overview]6 Months - Progression-free Survival According to Response Evaluation Using Macdonald Criteria
NCT00049127 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Progression-free
NCT00049127 (4) [back to overview]Confirmed Response (i.e., an Objective Status of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Regression (REGR) on 2 Successive Evaluations at Least 4 Weeks Apart After the Start of Study Treatment).
NCT00049127 (4) [back to overview]6-month Progression-free Survival (PFS), Defined as a Patient Being Alive and Progression-free 183 Days After the Date of Registration.
NCT00049127 (4) [back to overview]Overall Time to Death
NCT00061945 (6) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Alemtuzumab (Phase I)
NCT00061945 (6) [back to overview]Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) During Treatment With Alemtuzumab (Phase II)
NCT00061945 (6) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival, for Only Complete Response Patients
NCT00061945 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00061945 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Proceed to Course V Within 2-6 Weeks of the Last Dose of Alemtuzumab (Phase II)
NCT00061945 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Complete Remission
NCT00068380 (5) [back to overview]Toxicity Summary
NCT00068380 (5) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure
NCT00068380 (5) [back to overview]Response Rate
NCT00068380 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00068380 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00070499 (5) [back to overview]Toxicity
NCT00070499 (5) [back to overview]Two Year Relapse-free Survival
NCT00070499 (5) [back to overview]Hematologic Response
NCT00070499 (5) [back to overview]2-year Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00070499 (5) [back to overview]Molecular Response Rate at 12 Months
NCT00074308 (3) [back to overview]MTD, Defined as One Dose Level Below the Dose That Induced DLT in at Least One Third of Patients at a Dose Level, Graded According to NCI CTCAE Version 3.0 (Phase I)
NCT00074308 (3) [back to overview]Response Rate at 8 Weeks, Evaluated Using RECIST (Phase II)
NCT00074308 (3) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival at 16 Weeks (Phase II)
NCT00075400 (5) [back to overview]Tumor Response
NCT00075400 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) > 6 Months
NCT00075400 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00075400 (5) [back to overview]Duration of Progression Free Survival
NCT00075400 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of Adverse Effects as Assessed by CTCAE v 3.0
NCT00087152 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Grade 3 Through 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drug
NCT00087152 (3) [back to overview]Confirmed Response Rate (Complete and Partial)
NCT00087152 (3) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival at 6 Months
NCT00090987 (1) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Who Achieve a Clinical Response
NCT00103844 (13) [back to overview]Cytogenetic Response After Crossover
NCT00103844 (13) [back to overview]Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths and Hematologic Toxicities Prior to Crossover
NCT00103844 (13) [back to overview]Time to MCyR Prior to Crossover
NCT00103844 (13) [back to overview]Time to CHR Prior to Crossover
NCT00103844 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR) at Week 12
NCT00103844 (13) [back to overview]Major Molecular Response (MMR)
NCT00103844 (13) [back to overview]Duration of MCyR at 24 Months
NCT00103844 (13) [back to overview]Complete Hematologic Response (CHR) at Any Time Prior to Crossover
NCT00103844 (13) [back to overview]CHR After Crossover
NCT00103844 (13) [back to overview]Blood Sample Collection for Pharmacokinetic (PK) Analysis of Dasatinib
NCT00103844 (13) [back to overview]MCyR at Any Time Prior to Crossover
NCT00103844 (13) [back to overview]Duration of MCyR at 12 Months and 18 Months
NCT00103844 (13) [back to overview]Duration of Complete Hematologic Response (CHR)
NCT00114959 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Experiences (AEs)
NCT00115739 (4) [back to overview]6 Month Progression Free Survival Rate
NCT00115739 (4) [back to overview]6 Month Survival Rate
NCT00115739 (4) [back to overview]Overall Response (Complete and Partial Response) Rate at 8 Weeks
NCT00115739 (4) [back to overview]Rate of Grade 3, Grade 4 and Grade 5 Toxicities Experienced by Patients With Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer Who Are Treated With Gleevec
NCT00124748 (17) [back to overview]Estimated Rate of Overall Survival (OS) in Two Treatment Arms
NCT00124748 (17) [back to overview]Imatinib Pharmacokinetic Trough Plasma Concentration (Cmin) at Month 12
NCT00124748 (17) [back to overview]Mean Actual Dose Intensity Per Day
NCT00124748 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) Rates at 12 Months
NCT00124748 (17) [back to overview]Time to First Complete Cytogenetic Response
NCT00124748 (17) [back to overview]Time to First Complete Hematological Response (CHR)]
NCT00124748 (17) [back to overview]Time to First Major Molecular Response
NCT00124748 (17) [back to overview]Estimated Rate of Progression Free Survival (PFS) in Two Treatment Arms
NCT00124748 (17) [back to overview]Estimated Rate of Progression to Accelerated Phase (AC)/Blast Crisis (BC) in Two Treatment Arms
NCT00124748 (17) [back to overview]Estimated Rates of Progression Free Survival (PFS) on Treatment by Major Molecular Response (MMR)
NCT00124748 (17) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Duration of First Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR)
NCT00124748 (17) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Duration of First Major Molecular Response Until Confirmed Loss
NCT00124748 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) Rate at 12, 24, 36, 42 Months
NCT00124748 (17) [back to overview]Estimated Rate of Event Free Survival (EFS) in Two Treatment Arms
NCT00124748 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Undetectable Levels of Bcr-Abl (A Fusion Gene of the Breakpoint Cluster Region [Bcr] Gene and Abelson Proto-oncogene [Abl] Genes) Transcripts
NCT00124748 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) Rates at 24, 36, and 42 Months
NCT00124748 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Hematological Response (CHR) Rates at 12, 24, 36, and 42 Months
NCT00154375 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS) During the Study Duration
NCT00154375 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Death, Other Serious or Clinically Significant Adverse Events (AEs) or Related Discontinuations
NCT00161213 (4) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00161213 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00161213 (4) [back to overview]1-year Survival Rate
NCT00161213 (4) [back to overview]Response Rate
NCT00171158 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival (by Month)
NCT00171158 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00171223 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Cytogenetic Response (Complete Cytogenetic Response and Major Cytogenetic Response) to STI571
NCT00171223 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4 Cancer-related Symptoms
NCT00171223 (7) [back to overview]Time to Complete Hematologic Response to STI571
NCT00171223 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Hematologic Response to STI571
NCT00171223 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Complete Hematologic Response to STI571
NCT00171223 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates
NCT00171223 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
NCT00171249 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Cytogenetic Response in Accelerated Phase Chronic Myeloid/Myelogenous Leukemia
NCT00171249 (7) [back to overview]Time to Response in Participants With Accelerated Phase Chronic Myeloid/Myelogenous Leukemia
NCT00171249 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival by Dose in Participants With Accelerated Phase Chronic Myeloid/Myelogenous Leukemia
NCT00171249 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival by Disease
NCT00171249 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Response in Participants With Accelerated Phase Chronic Myeloid/Myelogenous Leukemia
NCT00171249 (7) [back to overview]Time to Progression to Blast Crisis in Participants With Accelerated Phase Chronic Myeloid/Myelogenous Leukemia
NCT00171249 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Hematologic Response in Accelerated Phase Chronic Myeloid/Myelogenous Leukemia
NCT00193180 (3) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT00193180 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00193180 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00193258 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS), the Length of Time, in Months, That Patients Were Alive From Their First Date of Protocol Treatment Until Worsening of Their Disease
NCT00193258 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS), the Length of Time, in Months, That Patients Were Alive From Their First Date of Protocol Treatment Until Death
NCT00193258 (3) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR), the Percentage of Patients Who Experience an Objective Benefit From Treatment
NCT00210119 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Reduction of BCR-ABL Transcript Level > 4.5 Log From the Start of From Initiation of Treatment
NCT00210119 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Molecular Response
NCT00237185 (12) [back to overview]Best Tumor Response (Core)
NCT00237185 (12) [back to overview]Best Tumor Response (Core + Extension)
NCT00237185 (12) [back to overview]Time to Onset of Response (Core + Extension)
NCT00237185 (12) [back to overview]Time to Onset of Response (Core)
NCT00237185 (12) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure (Core + Extension)
NCT00237185 (12) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure (Core)
NCT00237185 (12) [back to overview]Time to Progression (Core + Extension)
NCT00237185 (12) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) (Core + Extension)
NCT00237185 (12) [back to overview]Overall Survival (Core)
NCT00237185 (12) [back to overview]Overall Survival (Core + Extension)
NCT00237185 (12) [back to overview]Duration of Response (Core)
NCT00237185 (12) [back to overview]Duration of Response (Core + Extension)
NCT00243191 (1) [back to overview]To Collect Matched Tumor Tissue of Trial Participants With Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans Before and After Treatment With Imatinib for Future Use in cDNA Microarray and Tissue Array Studies.
NCT00251225 (3) [back to overview]Overall Time To Progression (TTP)
NCT00251225 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00251225 (3) [back to overview]Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Response Rate
NCT00267085 (1) [back to overview]Response: One Log Decrease in BCR-ABL
NCT00278876 (3) [back to overview]2-year Relapse Free Survival Rate
NCT00278876 (3) [back to overview]2-year Overall Survival Rate
NCT00278876 (3) [back to overview]Toxicity Profile
NCT00290771 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Who Had Clinical Benefit
NCT00290771 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With an Objective Overall Response (OOR)
NCT00290771 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Surviving at Months 6, 12, and 24
NCT00290771 (6) [back to overview]Duration of Objective Overall Response (OOR)
NCT00290771 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Progression-free Survival at Months 6 and 12
NCT00290771 (6) [back to overview]Number of Patients With at Least 1 Adverse Event
NCT00320190 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With On-study AEs of Special Interest
NCT00320190 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Death as Outcome, Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-related AEs, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation
NCT00323063 (2) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT00323063 (2) [back to overview]Response Rate (Complete and Partial Response)
NCT00323362 (3) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT00323362 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Who Meet Critieria for Response
NCT00323362 (3) [back to overview]1-year Survival
NCT00324987 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00324987 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT00324987 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Grade 3 Through Grade 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drug
NCT00331409 (5) [back to overview]Median Time to Progression
NCT00331409 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT00331409 (5) [back to overview]Number of Subjects That Demonstrated a Reduction in Tumor Measurements.
NCT00331409 (5) [back to overview]Overall Number of Participants Who Achieve a Response Rate (Complete Response, Partial Response, and Stable Disease) at 3 Months
NCT00331409 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival at 3 Months
NCT00333840 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety (Second-line Treatment)
NCT00333840 (10) [back to overview]Kaplan Meier Estimates of Event Free Survival (All Randomized Participants)
NCT00333840 (10) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Overall Survival (All Randomized Participants)
NCT00333840 (10) [back to overview]Kaplan Meier Estimates of Time to Progression to Accelerated Phase (AP) or Blast Crisis (BC) (All Randomized Participants)
NCT00333840 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (Second-line Treatment)
NCT00333840 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (First-line Treatment)
NCT00333840 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Event Free Survival Events (All Randomized Participants)
NCT00333840 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Best Cytogenetic Response (Second-line Treatment)
NCT00333840 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Best Cytogenetic Response (First-line Treatment)
NCT00333840 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety (First-line Treatment)
NCT00338728 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival of Participants
NCT00338728 (2) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT00354913 (4) [back to overview]Median Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00354913 (4) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00354913 (4) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT00354913 (4) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival at 6 Months
NCT00362466 (1) [back to overview]Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths, and Discontinuations Due to AEs
NCT00372567 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Pain Progression
NCT00372567 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Pain Relief Response
NCT00372567 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Objective Response of Complete Response or Partial Response
NCT00372567 (14) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DR)
NCT00372567 (14) [back to overview]Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score - Imatinib Treatment Arm
NCT00372567 (14) [back to overview]Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D)- Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Sunitinib Treatment Arm
NCT00372567 (14) [back to overview]Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D)- Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Imatinib Treatment Arm
NCT00372567 (14) [back to overview]Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score- Sunitinib Treatment Arm
NCT00372567 (14) [back to overview]Time to Tumor Response (TTR)
NCT00372567 (14) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)
NCT00372567 (14) [back to overview]Time to Pain Relief Response (TTPR)
NCT00372567 (14) [back to overview]Time to Pain Progression (TTPP)
NCT00372567 (14) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00372567 (14) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00408460 (3) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (Complete and Partial Responses) as Assessed by RECIST Criteria
NCT00408460 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00408460 (3) [back to overview]Time to Tumor Progression
NCT00415857 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Immunologic Response
NCT00415857 (2) [back to overview]Molecular Response Rate
NCT00415909 (1) [back to overview]Response Rate (Major and Complete Cytogenetic Response)
NCT00424385 (3) [back to overview]Overall Clinical Benefit
NCT00424385 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients Experiencing Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT's)
NCT00424385 (3) [back to overview]Time to Disease Progression (TTP)
NCT00424515 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00424515 (3) [back to overview]Best Overall Response
NCT00424515 (3) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT00427999 (5) [back to overview]Time to Progression-free Survival
NCT00427999 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival Rate
NCT00427999 (5) [back to overview]Quality of Life Assessed With EORTC-30
NCT00427999 (5) [back to overview]PSA Response Rate
NCT00427999 (5) [back to overview]Time to PSA Response
NCT00458848 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reaching Overall Survival
NCT00458848 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients Reaching Complete Hematological Response After Induction Therapy
NCT00458848 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reaching Disease Free Survival
NCT00470470 (2) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT00470470 (2) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT00471328 (9) [back to overview]Number of Responders With Confirmed Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) From Local Investigator's Assessment Based on Treatment Crossover Analysis Set
NCT00471328 (9) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) From Central Radiology Review Based on Primary Analysis (Data Cut-off: June, 2008)
NCT00471328 (9) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) From Local Investigator's Assessment Based on Treatment Crossover Analysis Set
NCT00471328 (9) [back to overview]Overall Survival for Treatment Crossover Analysis Set
NCT00471328 (9) [back to overview]Overall Survival During Core and Extension Phases of the Study
NCT00471328 (9) [back to overview]Overall Survival Based on Primary Analysis (Data Cut-off:June, 2008)
NCT00471328 (9) [back to overview]Overall Clinical Benefit (Complete Response [CR]/Partial Response [PR] or Stable Disease [SD]) From Central Radiology Review Based on Primary Analysis (Data Cut-off: June, 2008)
NCT00471328 (9) [back to overview]Overall Clinical Benefit (Complete Response [CR]/Partial Response [PR] or Stable Disease [SD]) From Local Investigator's Assessment Based on Treatment Crossover Analysis Set
NCT00471328 (9) [back to overview]Number of Responders With Confirmed Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) From Central Radiology Review During Primary Analysis (Data Cut-off: June, 2008)
NCT00471497 (31) [back to overview]Rate of a ≥ 4 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts in Nilotinib Treatment Arms With Imatinib
NCT00471497 (31) [back to overview]Rate of Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) on Nilotinib 400 mg BID Therapy After Insufficient Response During Core Treatment and Switch to Extension Phase (Extension)
NCT00471497 (31) [back to overview]Rate of Major Molecular Response (MMR) on Nilotinib 400 mg BID Therapy After Insufficient Response During Core Treatment and Switch to Extension Phase (Extension)
NCT00471497 (31) [back to overview]Rate of Hematologic Response on Nilotinib 400 mg BID Therapy After Insufficient Response During Core Treatment and Switch to Extension Phase (Extension)
NCT00471497 (31) [back to overview]Actual Dose-intensity
NCT00471497 (31) [back to overview]Duration of CCyR
NCT00471497 (31) [back to overview]All Collected Deaths
NCT00471497 (31) [back to overview]Duration of Both a ≥ 4 and ≥ 4.5 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts
NCT00471497 (31) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With MMR at 12 Months Between All 3 Arms by Sokal Risk Group With Imputation
NCT00471497 (31) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Cmin
NCT00471497 (31) [back to overview]Rate of a ≥ 4.5 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts in Nilotinib Treatment Arms With Imatinib
NCT00471497 (31) [back to overview]Time to Both a ≥ 4 and ≥ 4.5 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts
NCT00471497 (31) [back to overview]Rate of Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) in Nilotinib Treatment Arms With Imatinib at 12 Months and Beyond 12 Months
NCT00471497 (31) [back to overview]Rate of Hematologic Response
NCT00471497 (31) [back to overview]Rate of MMR at 6 Months and Beyond in All 3 Treatment Arms
NCT00471497 (31) [back to overview]Time to Progression to AP/BC
NCT00471497 (31) [back to overview]Rates of Durable MMR at 24 Months Between All 3 Arms
NCT00471497 (31) [back to overview]Rate of Major Molecular Response (MMR) at 12 Months Between Two Nilotinib Arms
NCT00471497 (31) [back to overview]Time to First MMR
NCT00471497 (31) [back to overview]Time to Complete Cytogenic Response (CCyR)
NCT00471497 (31) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00471497 (31) [back to overview]Rate of a ≥ 4 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts on Nilotinib 400 mg BID Therapy After Insufficient Response During Core Treatment and Switch to Extension Phase (Extension)
NCT00471497 (31) [back to overview]Rate of ≥ 4.5 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts on Nilotinib 400 mg BID Therapy After Insufficient Response During Core Treatment and Switch to Extension Phase (Extension)
NCT00471497 (31) [back to overview]Presence of Newly Observed BCR-ABL Mutations in Patients Post-baseline and Correlate With Response to Treatment With Imatinib and Nilotinib (Extension)
NCT00471497 (31) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Tmax
NCT00471497 (31) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Cmax
NCT00471497 (31) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: AUC0-last
NCT00471497 (31) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00471497 (31) [back to overview]Major Molecular Response Rate (MMR) at 12 Months Between All 3 Arms - With Imputation
NCT00471497 (31) [back to overview]Event-free Survival (EFS)
NCT00471497 (31) [back to overview]Duration of MMR
NCT00477269 (24) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Death During the Core
NCT00477269 (24) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Death During the Extension
NCT00477269 (24) [back to overview]Blood Gas Measurement - PvO2 at Baseline and Study Completion
NCT00477269 (24) [back to overview]Blood Gas Measurement - pH at Baseline and Study Completion
NCT00477269 (24) [back to overview]Blood Gas Measurement - PaO2 at Baseline and Study Completion
NCT00477269 (24) [back to overview]Blood Gas Measurement - PaCO2 at Baseline and Study Completion
NCT00477269 (24) [back to overview]Blood Gas Measurement - Arterial Saturation at Baseline and Study Completion
NCT00477269 (24) [back to overview]Mean Pulmonary Artery Pressure (PAP) at Baseline and Study Completion
NCT00477269 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline of Six Minute Walk Test - Number of Stops at Different Time Periods
NCT00477269 (24) [back to overview]Borg Score-Systolic Blood Pressure During the Six Minutes Walk Test at Different Time Periods
NCT00477269 (24) [back to overview]Borg Score-Oxygen Saturation(SaO2) During the Six Minutes Walk Test at Different Time Periods
NCT00477269 (24) [back to overview]Borg Score-Heart Rate (HR) During the Six Minutes Walk Test at Different Time Periods
NCT00477269 (24) [back to overview]Mean Cardiac Output (CO) at Baseline and Study Completion
NCT00477269 (24) [back to overview]Mean Heart Rate (HR) at Baseline and Study Completion
NCT00477269 (24) [back to overview]Blood Gas Measurement - Venous Saturation at Baseline and Study Completion
NCT00477269 (24) [back to overview]Mean Pulmonary Artery Wedge Pressure (PAWP) at Baseline and Study Completion
NCT00477269 (24) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension (PAH) Assessd by World Health Organization (WHO) Classification on Physical Activity
NCT00477269 (24) [back to overview]Mean Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR) at Baseline and Study Completion
NCT00477269 (24) [back to overview]Borg Score-Diastolic Blood Pressure During the Six Minutes Walk Test at Different Time Periods
NCT00477269 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline of Six Minute Walk Test - Total Duration of Stops at Different Time Periods
NCT00477269 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline of Six Minute Walk Test - Total Distance Walked at Different Time Periods
NCT00477269 (24) [back to overview]Mean Systemic Vascular Resistance (SVR) at Baseline and Study Completion
NCT00477269 (24) [back to overview]Mean Systolic Arterial Pressure (SAP) at Baseline and Study Completion
NCT00477269 (24) [back to overview]Borg Score During the Six Minutes Walk Test at Different Time Periods
NCT00481247 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Remaining in Confirmed Complete Cytogenetic Response (cCCyR)
NCT00481247 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Abnormalities in On-study Laboratory Test Results
NCT00481247 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Drug-related AEs, Drug-related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Drug-related AEs Leading to Discontinuation, and All Deaths
NCT00481247 (9) [back to overview]Time to Confirmed Complete Cytogenic Response (cCCyR) Overall
NCT00481247 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00481247 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00481247 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) at Any Time
NCT00481247 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Best Confirmed Complete Cytogenetic Response (cCCyR) Within 12 Months
NCT00481247 (9) [back to overview]Time to Major Molecular Response (MMR) Overall
NCT00485485 (1) [back to overview]Participant Response Rate
NCT00499889 (3) [back to overview]Participants' With mCR Response to Post Transplant Imatinib Mesylate Therapy
NCT00499889 (3) [back to overview]Participants' With mCR Response to Post Transplant DLI
NCT00499889 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants in Complete Molecular Remission at 1 Year
NCT00500110 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Pathological Complete Response
NCT00506779 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complete Response
NCT00506779 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
NCT00506831 (5) [back to overview]Cell Types That Contribute to the Gene Expression Changes Associated With Imatinib Therapy
NCT00506831 (5) [back to overview]Percent Change in Modified Rodnan Skin Score at 6 Months Compared to Baseline
NCT00506831 (5) [back to overview]Change in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire at 6 Months Compared to Baseline
NCT00506831 (5) [back to overview]Change in Pulmonary Function Tests at 6 Months Compared to Baseline
NCT00506831 (5) [back to overview]Change in Dermal Thickness and Collagen Separation on Cutaneous Histopathology at 6 Months Compared to Baseline
NCT00509093 (5) [back to overview]Median Progression-free Survival (PFS) for Patients Less Than 60 Years of Age
NCT00509093 (5) [back to overview]Toxicity as Measured by NCI CTC v. 3.0
NCT00509093 (5) [back to overview]Percent of Participants Less Than 60 Years of Age With PFS at 8 and 13 Months Post-treatment
NCT00509093 (5) [back to overview]Percent of Participants 60 Years of Age or Older With PFS at 8 and 13 Months Post-treatment
NCT00509093 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival for Patients 60 Years of Age and Older
NCT00510653 (1) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT00512902 (5) [back to overview]Change in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (MRSS)
NCT00512902 (5) [back to overview]Change in FVC (Forced Vital Capacity)
NCT00512902 (5) [back to overview]Treatment-related Adverse Events
NCT00512902 (5) [back to overview]Change in DLco
NCT00512902 (5) [back to overview]Change in TLC (Total Lung Capacity)
NCT00555581 (6) [back to overview]Improvement in Indices of Pulmonary Function Measured by Change DLCO hb Adj % Predicted
NCT00555581 (6) [back to overview]Improvement in Indices of Pulmonary Function Measured by Change in FVC % Predicted
NCT00555581 (6) [back to overview]Improvement in the Modified Rodnan Skin Score
NCT00555581 (6) [back to overview]Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index
NCT00555581 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Month 12 in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Questionnaire:Mental Component Summary
NCT00555581 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Month 12 in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Questionnaire: Physical Component Summary
NCT00574873 (6) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of On-Treatment Transformation to Accelerated Phase (AP) or Blast Phase (BP) at 192 Weeks
NCT00574873 (6) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Retaining Complete Hematologic Response (CHR) at 192 Weeks
NCT00574873 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) at Year 1
NCT00574873 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) at Year 1
NCT00574873 (6) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Retaining Derived MMR at 144 Weeks
NCT00574873 (6) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Retaining CCyR at 192 Weeks
NCT00613171 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Non-response, Partial Response, Complete Response, and Remission Assessed by MRSS Values
NCT00613171 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (MRSS) at Each Time Point of Analysis
NCT00613171 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE's) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE's)
NCT00615927 (5) [back to overview]12-month Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00615927 (5) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00615927 (5) [back to overview]Median Progression-free Survival
NCT00615927 (5) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT00615927 (5) [back to overview]Safety and Tolerability of Gleevec + Hydroxyurea in Patients With Low-grade Gliomas
NCT00667953 (2) [back to overview]Safety - Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events
NCT00667953 (2) [back to overview]Response
NCT00677092 (1) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in the Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) to Assess Skin Tethering
NCT00684411 (3) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival
NCT00684411 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00684411 (3) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT00702403 (5) [back to overview]The Proportion of Patients at 1 Year With Treatment Efficacy Success
NCT00702403 (5) [back to overview]Survival
NCT00702403 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Safety Failure
NCT00702403 (5) [back to overview]Patients Alive With Out Relapse
NCT00702403 (5) [back to overview]Relapse
NCT00702689 (8) [back to overview]Percent Change in Absolute Range of Motion (ROM) From Baseline to 6 Months
NCT00702689 (8) [back to overview]Primary Range of Motion (ROM) Response
NCT00702689 (8) [back to overview]Total Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Provider Global Rating Score at Baseline and 6 Months
NCT00702689 (8) [back to overview]Total Skin Score at Baseline and 6 Months
NCT00702689 (8) [back to overview]Average Percentage Change in Range of Motion (ROM) Deficit
NCT00702689 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT00702689 (8) [back to overview]Change in Immunosuppression
NCT00702689 (8) [back to overview]Lung Function Score at Baseline and 6 Months
NCT00751036 (4) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate (DCR)
NCT00751036 (4) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure
NCT00751036 (4) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00751036 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00760877 (6) [back to overview]Rate of Confirmed Best Cumulative CMR
NCT00760877 (6) [back to overview]Rate of Confirmed Best Cumulative Complete Molecular Response (CMR)
NCT00760877 (6) [back to overview]Event-free Survival
NCT00760877 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00760877 (6) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00760877 (6) [back to overview]Number of Cross-over Participants With CMR
NCT00785785 (1) [back to overview]Time to Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00802841 (8) [back to overview]Duration of CCyR
NCT00802841 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00802841 (8) [back to overview]Time to CCyR
NCT00802841 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With CCyr
NCT00802841 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR)
NCT00802841 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR)
NCT00802841 (8) [back to overview]Event-Free Survival (EFS)
NCT00802841 (8) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00840450 (3) [back to overview]Progression-free-tolerance
NCT00840450 (3) [back to overview]the Best Overall Clinical Response
NCT00840450 (3) [back to overview]Progression-free-survival at 12 Months
NCT00861471 (5) [back to overview]Time to PSA Progression
NCT00861471 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response
NCT00861471 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Measurable Disease Response
NCT00861471 (5) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival Time
NCT00861471 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Greater or Equal to 80% PSA Reduction From Baseline Without Clinical or Radiologic Evidence of Progression
NCT00867113 (4) [back to overview]Recurrence-free Survival up to 60 Months
NCT00867113 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) at 60 Months
NCT00867113 (4) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Recurrence-free Survival up to 60 Months
NCT00867113 (4) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Overall Survival (OS) up to 60 Months
NCT00867334 (2) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Adverse Events
NCT00867334 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Stabilization or Reduction in Tumor Size
NCT00882206 (4) [back to overview]Level of Methylation
NCT00882206 (4) [back to overview]Level of Methylation
NCT00882206 (4) [back to overview]Level of Methylation
NCT00882206 (4) [back to overview]Response to Treatment
NCT00891527 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Survival at 48 Weeks
NCT00891527 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Disease Progression at 48 Weeks
NCT00891527 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Disease Stabilization at 48 Weeks
NCT00902174 (16) [back to overview]Clinical Worsening Comparing Imatinib Versus Placebo for Adjudicated Cases
NCT00902174 (16) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of QTI571 200 mg and Its Metabolite (GCP74588) Pre-dose and Between 0 Hour to 3 Hour Post-dose Per Participant
NCT00902174 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic Arterial Blood Pressure
NCT00902174 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systemic Vascular Resistance
NCT00902174 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Right Atrial Pressure
NCT00902174 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance
NCT00902174 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pulmonary Resistance Index
NCT00902174 (16) [back to overview]Covariance of End of Study CAMPHOR Score
NCT00902174 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure
NCT00902174 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Pulmonary Arterial Pressure
NCT00902174 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
NCT00902174 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Diastolic Arterial Blood Pressure
NCT00902174 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cardiac Output
NCT00902174 (16) [back to overview]Change in Borg Dyspnea Score During 6-minute Walk Test
NCT00902174 (16) [back to overview]Difference in Six-minute Walk Distance Test (6MWD) Between Imatinib and Placebo at 24 Weeks
NCT00902174 (16) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of QTI571 400 mg and Its Metabolite (GCP74588) Pre-dose and Between 0 Hour to 3 Hour Post-dose Per Participant
NCT00928642 (5) [back to overview]Tumor Response Rates Using Modified SWOG Criteria to the Combination of Gleevec and Gemzar in Patients With Relapsed Ovarian Cancer Who Have Failed at Least One Prior Chemotherapy Treatment.
NCT00928642 (5) [back to overview]To Estimate the Clinical Response Rate(Partial and Complete Response as Defined Under the SWOG Criterial)
NCT00928642 (5) [back to overview]To Determine the Distribution of the Overall Survival
NCT00928642 (5) [back to overview]The Cystostatic, Anti-tumor Activity of the Combination of Gleevec and Gemzar Via Progression-free Survival for at Least Six Months in Patients With Recurrent or Persistent Epithelial Ovarian or Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma.
NCT00928642 (5) [back to overview]To Determine the Safety and Tolerability Via Frequency and Severity of Adverse Effect of Combination Gleevec and Gemzar in This Cohort of Patients as Assessed Byt Common Toxicity Criteria
NCT00955916 (3) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT00955916 (3) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00955916 (3) [back to overview]Median Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00982488 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Died and Had Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Related SAEs, Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, Related AEs Leading to Discontinuation, Related AEs, and Related AEs of Special Interest
NCT01011075 (4) [back to overview]Toxicities
NCT01011075 (4) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT01011075 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01011075 (4) [back to overview]Response Rate
NCT01089595 (2) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT01089595 (2) [back to overview]Best Overall Response Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, Choi Criteria, and Positron Emission Tomography Imaging
NCT01097694 (25) [back to overview]Airway Wall Area
NCT01097694 (25) [back to overview]Airway Wall Thickness
NCT01097694 (25) [back to overview]Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)
NCT01097694 (25) [back to overview]Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI)
NCT01097694 (25) [back to overview]BAL Eosinophil %
NCT01097694 (25) [back to overview]Endobronchial Biopsy Smooth Muscle Tryptase-positive Mast Cells
NCT01097694 (25) [back to overview]Endobronchial Biopsy Total Tryptase-positive Mast Cells
NCT01097694 (25) [back to overview]Evening Peak Flow
NCT01097694 (25) [back to overview]FEV1 in Liters
NCT01097694 (25) [back to overview]Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) PGD2
NCT01097694 (25) [back to overview]Urinary Leukotriene E4
NCT01097694 (25) [back to overview]Serum Total Tryptase
NCT01097694 (25) [back to overview]Number of Asthma Exacerbations
NCT01097694 (25) [back to overview]Morning Peak Flow Measurement
NCT01097694 (25) [back to overview]Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO)
NCT01097694 (25) [back to overview]Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)
NCT01097694 (25) [back to overview]Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) Fluid Tryptase Level
NCT01097694 (25) [back to overview]Blood Eosinophils
NCT01097694 (25) [back to overview]Bronchoalveolar Lavage Histamine
NCT01097694 (25) [back to overview]Change in Maximum Post-Bronchodilator (BD) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) %
NCT01097694 (25) [back to overview]Change in Mean Methacholine Responsiveness as Assessed by the Provocation Concentration Causing a 20% Fall in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) (PC20) at Month 3 and 6 Versus Baseline
NCT01097694 (25) [back to overview]FEV1%
NCT01097694 (25) [back to overview]BAL Neutrophil %
NCT01097694 (25) [back to overview]Bronchoalveolar Lavage Cysteinyl Leukotrienes
NCT01097694 (25) [back to overview]Urinary Prostaglandin D2
NCT01117987 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Deaths
NCT01117987 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Incidence of Clinical Worsening Events
NCT01117987 (3) [back to overview]Change From Core Study Baseline in Six-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)
NCT01151852 (6) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT01151852 (6) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT01151852 (6) [back to overview]Response Rate
NCT01151852 (6) [back to overview]Safety and Tolerability of Imatinib
NCT01151852 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival(OS) and Time to Progression(TTP)
NCT01151852 (6) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate
NCT01275196 (17) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Progression-free Survival (PFS) on Treatment
NCT01275196 (17) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Time to First CCYR
NCT01275196 (17) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Time to First MMR
NCT01275196 (17) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Time to Progression to Accelerated Phase/Blast Crisis (AP/BC) on Treatment
NCT01275196 (17) [back to overview]Summary Statistics of Trough Imatinib and Major Metabolite CGP74588 of Imatinib and Nilotinib PK Concentration by Time Point
NCT01275196 (17) [back to overview]Modified ELN2009 Criteria
NCT01275196 (17) [back to overview]MMR Rate at Each Time Point
NCT01275196 (17) [back to overview]Best MMR by Each Timepoint
NCT01275196 (17) [back to overview]Durable MMR Rate at 24 Months
NCT01275196 (17) [back to overview]Best Complete Hematologic Response (CHR)
NCT01275196 (17) [back to overview]Best Complete Cytogenic Response (CCyR) Rate by Each Time Point
NCT01275196 (17) [back to overview]Major Molecular Response (MMR) at 12 Months - With Imputation.
NCT01275196 (17) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Duration of First CCyR Among Patients Who Achieved CCyR
NCT01275196 (17) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Duration of First MMR Among Patients Who Achieved MMR
NCT01275196 (17) [back to overview]Actual Dose Intensity
NCT01275196 (17) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Event-free Survival (EFS) on Treatment
NCT01275196 (17) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Overall Survival (OS) on Treatment
NCT01275222 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs): Phase I & II
NCT01275222 (8) [back to overview]Best Overall Response (BOR) as Assessed by Overall Response (Complete Response (CR) & Partial Response (PR)) - Phase I & II
NCT01275222 (8) [back to overview]Trough Concentrations for RAD001 and for Imatinib - Phase II
NCT01275222 (8) [back to overview]4-Month Progression-free Survival (PFS) Rate - Phase II
NCT01275222 (8) [back to overview]Trough Concentrations for RAD001 and for Imatinib - Phase II
NCT01275222 (8) [back to overview]All Collected Deaths
NCT01275222 (8) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) - Phase II
NCT01275222 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) - Phase I & II
NCT01281865 (1) [back to overview]Response Rate (CR + PR) Assessed by RECIST 1.1 (Phase II)
NCT01309997 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of CD27+ B Cells in Responders (SCR) and Non-responders
NCT01309997 (7) [back to overview]Significant Clinical Response
NCT01309997 (7) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of Treatment Failure
NCT01309997 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients Achieving Improvement in Cutaneous Sclerosis
NCT01309997 (7) [back to overview]Patients Who Were Able to Taper Corticosteroids
NCT01309997 (7) [back to overview]Baseline Histopathologic Score in the Two Treatment Arms
NCT01309997 (7) [back to overview]Patients With Any Percentage Decline in Any Grade of Sclerosis Without Increase in Percentage of Higher Grades of Sclerosis in Other Areas on the Vienna Skin Scale
NCT01312818 (2) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Who Achieved Complete Remission of Their Disease
NCT01312818 (2) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Experiencing Drug Related Adverse Events
NCT01319981 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Complete Remission at One Year
NCT01319981 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01319981 (3) [back to overview]Complete Response Duration
NCT01392469 (7) [back to overview]Geometric Mean Ratio of Dose Normalized AUCtau for Sildenafil Before and After Imatinib Administrations
NCT01392469 (7) [back to overview]Geometric Mean Ratio of Dose Normalized Cmax for Sildenafil Before and After Imatinib Administrations
NCT01392469 (7) [back to overview]Geometric Mean Ratio of Dose Normalized Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Bosentan Before and After Imatinib Administrations
NCT01392469 (7) [back to overview]Dose Normalized AUCtau of Imatinib and CGP74588 (Active Metabolite of Imatinib)
NCT01392469 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With At Least One or More Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT01392469 (7) [back to overview]Dose Normalized Cmax of Imatinib and CGP74588 (Active Metabolite of Imatinib)
NCT01392469 (7) [back to overview]Geometric Mean Ratio of Dose Normalized Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Tau (AUCtau) for Bosentan Before and After Imatinib Administrations
NCT01392495 (1) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Deaths
NCT01593254 (5) [back to overview]Time to Molecular Response (MR)^4.5
NCT01593254 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01593254 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving Major Molecular Response (MMR) After 12 Months of CML Treatment
NCT01593254 (5) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01593254 (5) [back to overview]Median Time to Major Molecular Response (MMR)
NCT01650805 (3) [back to overview]Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) Rate
NCT01650805 (3) [back to overview]Major Molecular Response (MMR) Rate at 12 Months
NCT01650805 (3) [back to overview]<10% BCR-ABL^IS Rate
NCT01673009 (1) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Tumor Volume at 6 Months
NCT01781975 (6) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c Levels Over Time
NCT01781975 (6) [back to overview]Number of Severe Hypoglycemic Events
NCT01781975 (6) [back to overview]Number of Adverse Events
NCT01781975 (6) [back to overview]Area Under the Stimulated C-peptide Curve (AUC) Mean Over the First 2 Hours of a 4 Hour Mixed Meal Tolerance Test at the 1 Year Visit
NCT01781975 (6) [back to overview]Area Under the Stimulated C-peptide Curve (AUC) Mean Over 4 Hours at 24 Months
NCT01781975 (6) [back to overview]Change in Insulin Dose (Units/kg) Over Time
NCT01795716 (1) [back to overview]Area Under Curve (AUC) Time Frame: Predose, 0.5,1,1.5,2,3,5,8,12,24,48,72hours Post-dose
NCT01827930 (8) [back to overview]Rate of BCR-ABL Undetectable
NCT01827930 (8) [back to overview]Time to the First BCR-ABL Undetectable
NCT01827930 (8) [back to overview]Molecular Response at 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months
NCT01827930 (8) [back to overview]Rate of Decline of 2-log of the BCR-ABL Transcript Rate at 3 ,6, 9 and 12 Months From Baseline - Randomised Study
NCT01827930 (8) [back to overview]Time to Complete Molecular Response (CMR) and Major Molecular Response (MMR)
NCT01827930 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01827930 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Presenting a Decline of the BCR-ABL Transcript Rate at 12 Months From Baseline - Randomised Study
NCT01827930 (8) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT02127372 (4) [back to overview]Phase 1 - Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of STI571
NCT02127372 (4) [back to overview]Phase II - Radiographic Response
NCT02127372 (4) [back to overview]Phase 1 - Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Docetaxel and Cisplatin
NCT02127372 (4) [back to overview]Phase 2: 1 Year Survival
NCT02130557 (16) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Retaining Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) at Month 48
NCT02130557 (16) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of Event Free Survival (EFS) Events
NCT02130557 (16) [back to overview]Summary of Trough Plasma Concentration by Presence of Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) of Bosutinib
NCT02130557 (16) [back to overview]Summary of Trough Plasma Concentration by Presence of Grade 1 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) of Bosutinib
NCT02130557 (16) [back to overview]Summary of Trough Plasma Concentration by Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) of Bosutinib
NCT02130557 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (NCI CTCAE) (Version 4.0)
NCT02130557 (16) [back to overview]Summary of Trough Plasma Concentration by Major Molecular Response (MMR) of Bosutinib
NCT02130557 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (NCI CTCAE) Version 4.03
NCT02130557 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) Up to Month 18
NCT02130557 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) at Month 12
NCT02130557 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) Up to Month 12
NCT02130557 (16) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) Rate
NCT02130557 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities
NCT02130557 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
NCT02130557 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation
NCT02130557 (16) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Retaining Major Molecular Response (MMR) at Month 48
NCT02257541 (3) [back to overview]Phase Ib Study: Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities
NCT02257541 (3) [back to overview]Phase Ib Portion: Response Rate (RR)
NCT02257541 (3) [back to overview]Phase Ib Study: Response Rate (RR)
NCT02269267 (7) [back to overview]Patient-reported Health Status Related to Diarrhea of Patients at 6 Months (After Stopping Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs)
NCT02269267 (7) [back to overview]Patient-reported Health Status Related to Diarrhea of Patients at Baseline (Before Stopping Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs)
NCT02269267 (7) [back to overview]Patient-reported Health Status Related to Fatigue of Patients at 6 Months (After Stopping Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs)
NCT02269267 (7) [back to overview]Patient-reported Health Status Related to Fatigue of Patients at Baseline (Before Stopping Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs)
NCT02269267 (7) [back to overview]Patient-reported Health Status Related to Sleep Status of Patients at 6 Months (After Stopping Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs)
NCT02269267 (7) [back to overview]Patient-reported Health Status Related to Sleep Status of Patients at Baseline (Before Stopping Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs)
NCT02269267 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Who Develop Molecular Recurrence After Discontinuing TKIs.
NCT02272777 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT02644525 (1) [back to overview]Percent of Baseline Loa Loa Microfilariae
NCT03023046 (5) [back to overview]Event-free Survival
NCT03023046 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complete Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) Response Rate
NCT03023046 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT03023046 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Morphological Complete Response Rate
NCT03023046 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT03112603 (24) [back to overview]Rate of Participants With Clinically Relevant Improvement of the Modified Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale Score
NCT03112603 (24) [back to overview]Vz/F of Ruxolitinib After Single (Cycle 1 Day 1) and Multiple (Cycle 1 Day 15) Doses
NCT03112603 (24) [back to overview]Tmax of Ruxolitinib After Single (Cycle 1 Day 1) and Multiple (Cycle 1 Day 15) Doses
NCT03112603 (24) [back to overview]t1/2 of Ruxolitinib After Single (Cycle 1 Day 1) and Multiple (Cycle 1 Day 15) Doses
NCT03112603 (24) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 50% Reduction in Daily Corticosteroid Dose
NCT03112603 (24) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Successfully Tapered Off of All Corticosteroids
NCT03112603 (24) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of Non-relapse Mortality (NRM)
NCT03112603 (24) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of Malignancy Relapse/Recurrence (MR)
NCT03112603 (24) [back to overview]Cmax of Ruxolitinib After Single (Cycle 1 Day 1) and Multiple (Cycle 1 Day 15) Doses
NCT03112603 (24) [back to overview]CL/F of Ruxolitinib After Single (Cycle 1 Day 1) and Multiple (Cycle 1 Day 15) Doses
NCT03112603 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bone Marrow Transplantation (FACT-BMT)
NCT03112603 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L
NCT03112603 (24) [back to overview]AUClast of Ruxolitinib After Single (Cycle 1 Day 1) and Multiple (Cycle 1 Day 15) Doses
NCT03112603 (24) [back to overview]AUCinf of Ruxolitinib After Single (Cycle 1 Day 1) and Multiple (Cycle 1 Day 15) Doses
NCT03112603 (24) [back to overview]Utilization of Medical Resources
NCT03112603 (24) [back to overview]Rate of FFS at Study Completion
NCT03112603 (24) [back to overview]Rate of Failure-free Survival (FFS)
NCT03112603 (24) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT03112603 (24) [back to overview]ORR at the End of Cycle 3
NCT03112603 (24) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
NCT03112603 (24) [back to overview]Efficacy of Ruxolitinib Versus Investigator's Choice Best Available Therapy (BAT) in Participants With Moderate or Severe Steroid Refractory Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (SR-cGvHD) Assessed by Overall Response Rate (ORR) at the Cycle 7 Day 1 Visit
NCT03112603 (24) [back to overview]Duration of Response Through Study Completion
NCT03112603 (24) [back to overview]BOR During Cross-over Treatment With Ruxolitinib
NCT03112603 (24) [back to overview]Best Overall Response (BOR) at Cycle 7 Day 1
NCT03131999 (2) [back to overview]Serum VEGF-D
NCT03131999 (2) [back to overview]Adverse Events
NCT03589326 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Negative Complete Remission (CR) at The End of Induction Phase
NCT03891901 (20) [back to overview]White Blood Cell Count
NCT03891901 (20) [back to overview]Number of Myelomonocytic Cells in the Blood
NCT03891901 (20) [back to overview]Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Imatinib
NCT03891901 (20) [back to overview]Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Imatinib
NCT03891901 (20) [back to overview]Half-life (T1/2) of Imatinib
NCT03891901 (20) [back to overview]Half-life (T1/2) of Imatinib
NCT03891901 (20) [back to overview]Elimination Rate Constant (Ke) of Imatinib
NCT03891901 (20) [back to overview]Elimination Rate Constant (Ke) of Rifabutin
NCT03891901 (20) [back to overview]Frequency of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT03891901 (20) [back to overview]Frequency of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT03891901 (20) [back to overview]Half-life (T1/2) of Isoniazid
NCT03891901 (20) [back to overview]Half-life (T1/2) of Rifabutin
NCT03891901 (20) [back to overview]Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Rifabutin
NCT03891901 (20) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Imatinib
NCT03891901 (20) [back to overview]Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Isoniazid
NCT03891901 (20) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Imatinib
NCT03891901 (20) [back to overview]Elimination Rate Constant (Ke) of Imatinib
NCT03891901 (20) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Isoniazid
NCT03891901 (20) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Rifabutin
NCT03891901 (20) [back to overview]Elimination Rate Constant (Ke) of Isoniazid
NCT05286528 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival Rate: Type of Second Line TKI
NCT05286528 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival Rate: Type of First Line TKI
NCT05286528 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival Rate: All Participants
[back to top]

Major Cytogenetic Response After 6 and 12 Months of Treatment.

"Cytogenetic response in terms of the percentage of Ph chromosome positive metaphases in bone marrow is defined as follows:~Complete* (0% Ph-positive cells) Partial* (1-34%) Minor (35-95%) None (96-100%).~*Major cytogenetic response includes complete and partial cytogenetic response." (NCT00015847)
Timeframe: 6 and 12 months after treatment

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Imatinib Mesylate18

[back to top]

Complete Cytogenetic Response at 6 and 12 Months (Phase II)

"Cytogenetic response in terms of the percentage of Ph chromosome positive metaphases in bone marrow is defined as follows:~Complete* (0% Ph-positive cells) Partial* (1-34%) Minor (35-95%) None (96-100%)." (NCT00015847)
Timeframe: At 6 and 12 months during phase II

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Imatinib Mesylate13

[back to top]

Peak Concentration (Cmax)

Peak concentration (cmax) is a pharmacokinetic measure defined as the highest concentration of a drug measured after the drug is administered. The cmax of imatinib mesylate on day 1 of course 1 is reported. Two milliliter (0.5 ml for children under the age of 5) blood samples were collected immediately prior to imatinib mesylate administration on Day 1 of Course 1 and at the following timepoints following drug administration: 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 10 and 12 hours after the morning dose. (NCT00021229)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Course 1

Interventionµg/ml (Mean)
Stratum I: Radiation + Imatinib Mesylate1.3
Stratum IIA: Imatinib Mesylate2.6
Stratum IIB: Imatinib Mesylate1.3

[back to top]

Pre-treatment Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor Values From Plasma

This study attempted to investigate in an exploratory manner the effect of biological markers on tumor growth. Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) may play a role in tumor development by helping tumor vessels establish and grow. Blood (plasma) was drawn from participants before treatment to measure the baseline plasma bFGF values. (NCT00021229)
Timeframe: Pre-treatment

Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
Stratum I: Radiation + Imatinib Mesylate8.69
Stratum IIA: Imatinib Mesylate32.3
Stratum IIB: Imatinib Mesylate11.3

[back to top]

Pre-treatment Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor Values From Urine

This study attempted to investigate in an exploratory manner the effect of biological markers on tumor growth. Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) may play a role in tumor development by helping tumor vessels establish and grow. Urine was collected from participants before treatment to measure the baseline urine bFGF values. (NCT00021229)
Timeframe: Pre-treatment

Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
Stratum I: Radiation + Imatinib Mesylate5665
Stratum IIA: Imatinib Mesylate10322
Stratum IIB: Imatinib Mesylate5312

[back to top]

Pre-treatment Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor From Urine

This study attempted to investigate in an exploratory manner the effect of biological markers on tumor growth. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) may play a role in tumor development by helping tumor vessels establish and grow. Urine was collected from participants before treatment to measure the baseline urine VEGF values. (NCT00021229)
Timeframe: Pre-treatment

Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
Stratum I: Radiation + Imatinib Mesylate79
Stratum IIA: Imatinib Mesylate86.1
Stratum IIB: Imatinib Mesylate45.3

[back to top]

Pre-treatment Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Values From Plasma

This study attempted to investigate in an exploratory manner the effect of biological markers on tumor growth. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) may play a role in tumor development by helping tumor vessels establish and grow. Blood (plasma) was drawn from participants before treatment to measure the baseline plasma VEGF values. (NCT00021229)
Timeframe: Pre-treatment

Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
Stratum I: Radiation + Imatinib Mesylate119.9
Stratum IIA: Imatinib Mesylate155.2
Stratum IIB: Imatinib Mesylate78.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Volume FLAIR at Two Weeks After Completion of Radiation

This study attempted to investigate in an exploratory manner the effect of radiation (RT) on changes in various neuroimaging variables in pediatric brainstem gliomas (stratum I). Neuroimaging changes may have some association with outcome (response, survival, etc.). Volume FLAIR is one parameter obtained from standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of the brain. Volume FLAIR was obtained at baseline (pre-radiation) and within two (+/- one) weeks after completion of RT. (NCT00021229)
Timeframe: Baseline and two weeks post completion of radiation

Interventioncubic centimeters (Mean)
Stratum I: Radiation + Imatinib Mesylate7.62

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival

Overall Survival (OS) is defined as the interval from initiation of treatment to death or date of last contact for surviving patients. (NCT00021229)
Timeframe: Assessed before radiation therapy, before the first dose of imatinib, then every 8 weeks.

InterventionDays (Median)
Stratum I: Radiation + Imatinib Mesylate324.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants in Phase I Stratum I With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) Observed During First 8 Weeks (Courses 1 and 2) of Imatinib Therapy

The dose limiting toxicity (DLT) analysis population consists of phase I stratum I participants who developed DLT during the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) estimation period (course 1 and 2) or who completed the MTD estimation period (courses 1 and 2) without DLTs. DLTs observed during courses 1 and 2 were used to estimate the MTD. The estimated MTD based on the 23 participants who either had a DLT during course 1 or 2 or completed courses 1 and 2 without DLT is 265 mg/m2/day. (NCT00021229)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Imatinib Mesylate Therapy to Week 8

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Stratum I: Radiation + Imatinib Mesylate5

[back to top]

Number of Participants in Phase I Stratum II With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) Observed During First 8 Weeks (Courses 1 and 2) of Imatinib Therapy

The dose limiting toxicity (DLT) analysis population consisted of phase I stratum II participants who developed DLT during the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) estimation period (courses 1 and 2) or who completed the MTD estimation period (courses 1 and 2) without DLTs. DLTs observed during courses 1 and 2 were used to estimate the MTD. The estimated MTD based on the DLT analysis population of 20 in stratum IIA was 465 mg/m2/day. An MTD was not established in stratum IIB as no DLTs were observed at the higher dose levels of 620 and 800 mg/m2/day. (NCT00021229)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Imatinib Mesylate Therapy to Week 8

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Stratum IIA: Imatinib Mesylate2
Stratum IIB: Imatinib Mesylate0

[back to top]

The Rate of Major Cytogenetic Response at 6 Months

Cytogenetic response is defined in terms of the percentage of Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome. Major cytogenetic response is defined as 0-34% Ph-positive cells. (NCT00022490)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Cytarabine/ Imatinib Mesylate5

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Major Toxicity (Toxicity Grade ≥ 3)

Highest grade toxicity per subject was counted. Toxicities were graded using Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) v 2.0. Grade refers to the severity of the toxicity, using Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for a given toxicity based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild, Grade 2 Moderate, Grade 3 Severe, Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling, Grade 5 Death related to toxicity. (NCT00028002)
Timeframe: Analysis occurs after all patients have been on study for at least 2 years. Measured from start of treatment to end of follow-up, to a maximum of 4.95 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pre-surgeryPost-surgery
Imatinib Mesylate34.648.9

[back to top]

FDG-PET as Biological Marker of Metabolic Response(MR) During Imatinib Mesylate (IM) Treatment, in Patients With GIST Who Are naı¨ve to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy

"evaluate FDG-PET as a non-invasive functional imaging tool to assess in situ tumor metabolism (as measured by the Standardized Uptake Values of FDG in the tumor) prior to and during the administration of IM. %change in SUVmax <1 indicate decreased tumor metabolism while values >1 indicated an increase in tumor metabolism.~Metabolic response by 18F-FDG PET was determined in accordance with the criteria of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer EORTC), with increases or decreases of more than 25% in SUVmax defining progressive metabolic disease (PMD) and partial metabolic response (PMR), respectively, and new lesions defining PMD." (NCT00028002)
Timeframe: change from baseline to 1 week post therapy

Interventionpercentage change in SUVmax (Mean)
PET Patricipants-59.4

[back to top]

Rate of Disease Progression at 2 Years

Kaplan-Meier estimate of disease progression rate. Disease progression is determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours criteria (RECIST). RECIST criteria is described here: http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/docs/recist_guideline.pdf (NCT00028002)
Timeframe: From registration to two years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Imatinib Mesylate13.8

[back to top]

Rates of Objective Response (Complete, Partial, and Stable)

The percentage of patients who achieved a complete, partial or stable response prior to surgery as assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours criteria (RECIST). RECIST criteria is described here: http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/docs/recist_guideline.pdf. (NCT00028002)
Timeframe: Pretreatment and prior to surgery (at 4-10 weeks, based on surgery timing)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable Disease
Imatinib Mesylate05.886.5

[back to top] [back to top]

Relapse Free Survival

Number of patients with relapsed disease within 1 Year post-transplant. Relapse is defined as the detection of > 5% blasts after a documented complete remission. (NCT00036738)
Timeframe: Assessed up to 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Allogeneic Nonmyeloablative HSCT)3

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Number of patients surviving up to five years post-transplant. (NCT00036738)
Timeframe: Assessed up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
6 Months1 Year2 Years3 Years4 Years5 Years
Treatment (Allogeneic Nonmyeloablative HSCT)262419171613

[back to top]

Leukemia-free Survival

Number of patients surviving in CR up to five years post-transplant. (NCT00036738)
Timeframe: Assessed up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
6 Months1 Year2 Years3 Years4 Years5 Years
Treatment (Allogeneic Nonmyeloablative HSCT)191713111110

[back to top] [back to top]

Response To Induction Therapy With Hyper-CVAD Plus Imatinib Mesylate

"Complete Remission (CR): Defined as the presence of 5% or less blasts in the bone marrow, with a granulocyte count of 1.0 × 109/L or higher and a platelet count of 100 × 109/L and no extramedullary disease.~Partial Response (PR): As above for CR except for the presence of 6-25% marrow blasts.~Molecular CR: Same as for CR with RT-PCR negativity for bcr-abl.~Induction Death: Defined as death occurring after start of therapy without meeting the definition of CR or resistant disease." (NCT00038610)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete RemissionPartial RemissionMolecular Complete RemissionInduction Death
Hyper-CVAD + Imatinib421171

[back to top]

Disease-Free Survival Rate at 2-year and 5-year.

Disease-Free Survival (DFS) was calculated from the time of complete remission until relapse or death due to any cause. (NCT00038610)
Timeframe: Baseline to 2-year and 5-year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
2-year DFS rate5-year DFS rate
Hyper-CVAD + Imatinib4943

[back to top]

Overall Survival Rate at 2-year and 5-year.

Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of initiation of therapy until death. (NCT00038610)
Timeframe: Baseline to 2-year and 5-year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
2-year OS rate5-year OS rate
Hyper-CVAD + Imatinib5743

[back to top]

Participant Complete Hematologic Remission (CHR) Classified

Number of participants with Complete Hematologic Remission (CHR): normalization >4 weeks of bone marrow (<5% blasts), peripheral blood with WBC <10 x 109/L & no peripheral blasts, promyelocytes or myelocytes; disappearance all signs/symptoms disease. CHR further classified according to suppression of Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) by cytogenetics or i Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH): No cytogenetic response - Ph positive 100% of pretreatment value; Minor cytogenetic response - Ph positive 35-90% of pretreatment value; Partial cytogenetic response - Ph positive 1-34% of pretreatment value; Complete cytogenetic response - Ph positive 0%. Hematologic surveys twice per year with bone aspirations at discretion of treating physician. (NCT00038649)
Timeframe: Response to imatinib mesylate evaluated after completing 3 - 12 months of therapy.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
No cytogenetic responseMinor cytogenetic responsePartial cytogenetic responseComplete cytogenetic response
Gleevec014105

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Molecular Response of Complete or Partial Hematologic Remission

Complete Hematologic Remission (CHR): normalization >4 weeks of bone marrow (<5% blasts), peripheral blood with White Blood Cells (WBC) <10 x 109/L & no peripheral blasts, promyelocytes or myelocytes; disappearance all signs/symptoms disease. Partial Hematologic Response (PHR) = CHR except persistence of immature cells (myelocytes, metamyelocytes), or splenomegaly < 50% of pretreatment, or thrombocytosis >450x109/L but <50% of pretreatment. Hematologic surveys twice per year with bone aspirations at discretion of treating physician. (NCT00038649)
Timeframe: Response to imatinib mesylate evaluated after completing 3 - 12 months of therapy.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
CHRPHR
Gleevec1100

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Time from response to disease progression, measuring length of the response in those participants who responded. (NCT00038675)
Timeframe: From response evaluation (first evaluation following 2 months therapy) to disease progression or death or until disease progression whichever occurs first, up to 12 years and 5 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Imatinib Mesylate68

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Complete Response (CR)

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML), Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS): CR=Normalization peripheral blood & bone marrow with 5% or less blasts; normo- or hypercellular marrow; Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) > 1.0 x 10^9/L, & platelet count >100 x 10^9/L; or CR marrow=As per CR but platelet count < 100 x 10^9/L. Agnogenic myeloid metaplasia (AMM) & CMML: CR=Absence of signs/symptoms of disease; White blood count between 1 to 10 x 10^9/L with no peripheral blasts, promyelocytes, or myelocytes and normalization of bone marrow (< 5% blasts in normocellular or hypercellular marrow) for 4+ weeks. PV: CR=normalization of hemoglobin/hematocrit without need for phlebotomies, disappearance all signs/symptoms of disease. HES: CR=disappearance of eosinophilia (NCT00038675)
Timeframe: after 2 months of therapy, up to 1 year.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Acute LeukemiaChronic myeloproliferative disorders (CMPD)Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML)Essential ThrombocythemiaHypereosinophilic syndrome (HES)Systemic mastocytosis (SM)Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)MyelofibrosisPolycythemia Vera (PV)
Imatinib Mesylate002034012

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival defined as time from registration to disease progression or death from any cause. (NCT00038675)
Timeframe: From the start of therapy to death or disease progression, assessed up to 12 years and 5 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Imatinib Mesylate73.2

[back to top]

5 Year Disease-free Survival for Autologous & Allogeneic Transplant Groups

Percentage of patients who achieved a complete remission (CR) and were alive and relapse free at 5 years. The 5-year progression free survival was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. (NCT00039377)
Timeframe: 5 years from CR

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Patients With HLA-matched Sibling Donor46
Patients Without HLA-matched Sibling Donors47

[back to top]

5 Year Overall Survival for Autologous & Allogeneic Transplant Groups

Percentage of patients who were alive at 5 years. The 5-year progression free survival was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. (NCT00039377)
Timeframe: 5 years from registration

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Patients With HLA-matched Sibling Donor53
Patients Without HLA-matched Sibling Donors51

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival

"Disease-free survival (DFS) was measured as the interval from achievement of complete remission (CR) until relapse or death, regardless of cause; patients alive and in CR were censored at last follow-up. DFS was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method.~A complete remission (CR) was defined as recovery of morphologically normal bone marrow and blood counts (i.e., neutrophils >= 1.5 x 10^9/L and platelets > 100 x 10^9/L) and no circulating leukemic blasts or evidence of extramedullary leukemia and persisting for at least one month." (NCT00039377)
Timeframe: Duration of treatment (up to 10 years)

Interventionyears (Median)
Entire Cohort1.7

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival (OS) as the interval from the on-study date until death. OS was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. (NCT00039377)
Timeframe: Duration of study (up to 10 years)

Interventionyears (Median)
Entire Cohort3.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Achieved a BCR-ABL Response at 12 Months

"BCR-ABL response is defined in two ways: complete molecular response (CMR) and major molecular response (MMR).~Complete Molecular Response is defined as a Bcr-Abl (a fusion of gene of Bcr and ABl genes) ratio ≤0.0032% on the International Scale Bcr = breakpoint cluster gene Abl = abelson proto-oncogene~MMR is defined as Bcr-Abl (A fusion gene of the breakpoint cluster region [Bcr] gene and Abelson proto-oncogene [Abl] genes) transcript ratio ≤0.1% (≥ 3 log reduction of BCR-ABL transcripts from a standardized baseline), as detected by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction [RT-PCR] (performed centrally)." (NCT00039377)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete Molecular ResponseMajor Molecular Response
Entire Cohort94

[back to top]

Concentration (Steady State) of Imatinib During Cycle One (Pharmacokinetics)

"Blood collected before and at 1,2,4 ad 24 hours after ingestion of imatinib on day 8 of cycle 1~result is the measurement of the before dosing on day 8 (trough level) and the 24 hour dosing day 8" (NCT00045734)
Timeframe: pre dosing on day 8 and 24 hour dosing day 8 of Pre-dosing Day 9

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Day 8 Pre DosingDay 8 24 hour dosing
Treatment (Imatinib Mesylate)21292248

[back to top]

Tumor Response as Assessed by MRI Using Macdonald Criteria

"The Macdonald criteria, roughly similarly to other systems, divides response into 4 types of response based on imaging (MRI) and clinical features~1: complete response; 2: partial response; 3:stable disease; 4:progression~Complete response imaging features: disappearance of all enhancing disease (measurable and non-measurable) sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions clinical features; no corticosteroids; clinically stable or improved~Partial response imaging features: 50% or more decrease of all measurable enhancing lesions sustained for at least 4 weeks: no new lesions clinical features: stable or reduced corticosteroids; clinically stable or improved~Stable disease imaging features: does not qualify for complete response, partial response or progression clinical features: clinically stable~Progression imaging features: 25% of more increase in enhancing lesions; any new lesions clinical features: clinical deterioration" (NCT00045734)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
ProgressionStable
Treatment (Imatinib Mesylate)109

[back to top]

Toxicity as Assessed by the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) Version 2.0

percentage of patients who had grade 3 or grade 4 adverse events (NCT00045734)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years after completion of study treatment

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Treatment (Imatinib Mesylate)2.3

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival According to Response Evaluation Using Macdonald Criteria

"The Macdonald criteria, roughly similarly to other systems, divides response into 4 types of response based on imaging (MRI) and clinical features~1: complete response; 2: partial response; 3:stable disease; 4:progression~Complete response imaging features: disappearance of all enhancing disease (measurable and non-measurable) sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions clinical features; no corticosteroids; clinically stable or improved~Partial response imaging features: 50% or more decrease of all measurable enhancing lesions sustained for at least 4 weeks: no new lesions clinical features: stable or reduced corticosteroids; clinically stable or improved~Stable disease imaging features: does not qualify for complete response, partial response or progression clinical features: clinically stable~Progression imaging features: 25% of more increase in enhancing lesions; any new lesions clinical features: clinical deterioration" (NCT00045734)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment (Imatinib Mesylate)2

[back to top]

Determine Survival for Patients Treated With Imatinib Mesylate

survival determined from start of treatment to date of death (NCT00045734)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment (Imatinib Mesylate)16.8

[back to top]

6 Months - Progression-free Survival According to Response Evaluation Using Macdonald Criteria

"The Macdonald criteria, roughly similarly to other systems, divides response into 4 types of response based on imaging (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) and clinical features~1: complete response; 2: partial response; 3:stable disease; 4:progression~Complete response imaging features: disappearance of all enhancing disease (measurable and non-measurable) sustained for at least 4 weeks; no new lesions clinical features; no corticosteroids; clinically stable or improved~Partial response imaging features: 50% or more decrease of all measurable enhancing lesions sustained for at least 4 weeks: no new lesions clinical features: stable or reduced corticosteroids; clinically stable or improved~Stable disease imaging features: does not qualify for complete response, partial response or progression clinical features: clinically stable~Progression imaging features: 25% of more increase in enhancing lesions; any new lesions clinical features: clinical deterioration" (NCT00045734)
Timeframe: At 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment (Imatinib Mesylate)29.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Progression-free

"The percentage of patient progression-free at 12 months, 18 months, and PFS will be estimated. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and logrank tests will be used to estimate progression-time distributions.~Progression is defined using response criteria (the neurologic examination and the MRI and/or CT), >25% increase in product of perpendicular diameters of contrast enhancement or mass or appearance of new lesions." (NCT00049127)
Timeframe: Time from study registration to date of disease progression or last follow-up, assessed up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Mean)
Study 1 Arm C1.9
Study 2 Arm B4.0
Study 3 Arm E4.5

[back to top]

Confirmed Response (i.e., an Objective Status of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Regression (REGR) on 2 Successive Evaluations at Least 4 Weeks Apart After the Start of Study Treatment).

"Complete Response (CR) is defined using response criteria (the neurologic examination and the Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or Computerized Tomography (CT)), total disappearance of all tumor with patient off corticosteroids or only on adrenal replacement maintenance.~Partial Response (PR) is defined using response criteria (the neurologic examination and the MRI and/or CT), >=50% reduction in product of perpendicular diameters of contrast enhancement or mass with no new lesions with the patient being on stable or decreased steroid dose.~Regression (REGR) is defined using response criteria (the neurologic examination and the MRI and/or CT), unequivocal reduction in size of contrast-enhancement or decrease in mass effect as agreed upon independently by primary physician and quality control physicians; no new lesions. Patient should be on stable or decreased steroid dose." (NCT00049127)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of confirmed responses (Number)
Study 1 Arm C0
Study 2 Arm B5.1
Study 3 Arm E0

[back to top]

6-month Progression-free Survival (PFS), Defined as a Patient Being Alive and Progression-free 183 Days After the Date of Registration.

"The proportion of successes will be estimated using the Binomial point estimator (number of successes divided by the total number of evaluable patients) and the Binomial 90% confidence interval estimated using the Duffy-Santer algorithm.~Progression is defined using response criteria (the neurologic examination and the MRI and/or CT), >25% increase in product of perpendicular diameters of contrast enhancement or mass or appearance of new lesions." (NCT00049127)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Study 1 Arm C33.35
Study 2 Arm B33.3
Study 3 Arm E25

[back to top]

Overall Time to Death

Kaplan-Meier survival curves and logrank tests will be used to estimate survival distributions. (NCT00049127)
Timeframe: Time from date of registration to date of death due to any cause or last follow-up, assessed up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Study 1 Arm C14.2
Study 2 Arm B16.6
Study 3 Arm E13.6

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Alemtuzumab (Phase I)

The maximum tolerated dose is defined as the highest alemtuzumab dose at which less than 40% of patients develop the dose limiting toxicity (DLT), where DLT is defined as the inability to proceed (due to medical complications) with the protocol treatment within six weeks of receiving the last dose of alemtuzumab. Groups of six patients will be enrolled into each cohort at the time of re-registration prior to starting Course IV. After a cohort has accrued 6 patients and at least 3 have completed the 2-6 week post alemtuzumab observation period without DLT, the incoming patients will be assigned to the next cohort in the table while the DLT and other toxicities continue to be assessed for the newly closed cohort. If less than 3 out of 6 enrolled patients in a cohort have completed the 2-6 week post alemtuzumab observation period without DLT, additional patients may continue to enroll in that same cohort, i.e., accrual will not be suspended while waiting for patient follow-up data. (NCT00061945)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionmg (Number)
Phase I - Alemtuzumab and Combination Chemotherapy30

[back to top]

Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) During Treatment With Alemtuzumab (Phase II)

Minimal Residual Disease measures the presence of of circulating leukemia cells in the body. Patients that report a Complete Response (CR) during treatment are further tested to determine the presence of small amounts of circulating leukemia cells. Here we report the number of patients who were MRD negative. (NCT00061945)
Timeframe: 9 years 4 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase II - Alemtuzumab and Combination Chemotherapy16

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival, for Only Complete Response Patients

Disease Free Survival (DFS) is defined as the time from a Complete Response (CR) until death or relapse. The date of last clinical assesment will be used as the censor date for patients with no death or relapse. The DFS will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with confidence intervals presented. (NCT00061945)
Timeframe: 9 years 4 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase I - Alemtuzumab and Combination Chemotherapy58.6
Phase II - Alemtuzumab and Combination Chemotherapy19.8

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall Survival is defines as the time from registration to death due to any cause. It is estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with confidence intervals presented. (NCT00061945)
Timeframe: 9 years 4 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase I - Alemtuzumab and Combination Chemotherapy33.6
Phase II - Alemtuzumab and Combination Chemotherapy23.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Proceed to Course V Within 2-6 Weeks of the Last Dose of Alemtuzumab (Phase II)

The primary endpoint is the number of participants who are able to proceed to course V within two - six weeks of completion of course IV. (NCT00061945)
Timeframe: 8 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Phase II - Alemtuzumab and Combination Chemotherapy30

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Complete Remission

A complete remission (CR) requires the following: an absolute neutrophil count (segs and bands) > 1500/μl, no circulating blasts, platelets > 100,000/μl; bone marrow cellularity > 20% with trilineage hematopoiesis, and < 5% marrow blast cells, none of which appear neoplastic. All previous extramedullary manifestations of disease must be absent (e.g., lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, skin or gum infiltration, testicular masses, or CNS involvement). (NCT00061945)
Timeframe: 9 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Phase I - Alemtuzumab and Combination Chemotherapy92
Phase II - Alemtuzumab and Combination Chemotherapy145

[back to top]

Toxicity Summary

Toxicity assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 2.0. Grade 3 and above adverse events possibly, probably or definitely related to treatment. (NCT00068380)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days post treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Grade 3 : Alkaline phosphatase increasedGrade 3 : AnorexiaGrade 3 : ConstipationGrade 3 : FatigueGrade 3 : HyperglycemiaGrade 3 : Hemoglobin decreasedGrade 3 : HypoxiaGrade 3 : Abdominal painGrade 3 : HypophosphatemiaGrade 3 : HypokalemiaGrade 3 : HyponatremiaGrade 3 : Packed red blood cell transfusion
Treatment (Imatinib Mesylate)111111112113

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure

Defined as the time from start of treatment to the discontinuation of treatment for any reason, including disease progression, treatment toxicity, patient preference, or death Will be summarized using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimators. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions (NCT00068380)
Timeframe: From first day of treatment until discontinuation of treatment, assessed up to 30 days post treatment

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (Imatinib Mesylate)0.98

[back to top]

Response Rate

Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by X-Ray, MRI or CT: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR (NCT00068380)
Timeframe: Up to 6 years

Interventionpercentage of patients responding (Number)
Treatment (Imatinib Mesylate)0

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Will be summarized using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimators. (NCT00068380)
Timeframe: From first day of treatment to time of death due to any cause, assessed up to 5 years post-treatment

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (Imatinib Mesylate)3.25

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Estimated using the product-limit method of Kaplan and Meier. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT00068380)
Timeframe: From first day of treatment to the first observation of disease progression or death due to any cause, assessed up to 30 days post treatment

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (Imatinib Mesylate)1.35

[back to top]

Toxicity

Number of patients with Grade 3-5 adverse events that are related to study drug by given type of adverse event (NCT00070499)
Timeframe: Patients were assessed for adverse events monthly every 4 weeks for the first year, every 6 months for years 2 and 3, and annually for years 4 and 5.

,,,
InterventionParticipants with a given type of AE (Number)
ALT, SGPT (serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase)AST, SGOT (serum glutamic oxaloacetic trans.)Bilirubin (hyperbilirubinemia)Bronchospasm, wheezingCNS cerebrovascular ischemiaCPK (creatine phosphokinase)Cardiac-ischemia/infarctionColitisConduction abnor/Atrioventricular heart blockConstipationDehydrationDiarrheaDistention/bloating, abdominalDizzinessDyspnea (shortness of breath)Edema: head and neckEdema: limbEdema: trunk/genitalEdema: visceraFatigue (asthenia, lethargy, malaise)Febrile neutropeniaGGT (gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase)Glucose, serum-high (hyperglycemia)HematomaHemoglobinHepatobiliary/Pancreas-Other (Specify)Hot flashes/flushesHypertensionHypoxiaInfection with Grade 3 or 4 neutrophils - BloodInfection with Grade 3/4 neut - Lung (pneumonInfec with norm ANC or Grade 1 or 2 neut - ColonInf with no ANC or Grade 1/2 netLung (pneumonia)Infec with norm ANC or Grade 1 or 2 neut - ScrotumInfect with norm ANC or Grade 1 or 2 neut - SinusInf with no ANC or Grade 1/2 neut - Ur tract NOSInfection with unknown ANC - SinusLeft ventricular diastolic dysfunctionLeukocytes (total WBC)LymphopeniaMetabolic/Laboratory-Other (Specify)Mood alteration - depressionMucositis/stomatitis (clinical exam) - Oral cavityMuscle weak, not due to neurop. Whole body/generalNauseaNeuropathy: motorNeuropathy: sensoryNeutrophils/granulocytes (ANC/AGC)Pain - Abdomen NOSPain - BackPain - BonePain - Chest/thorax NOSPain - Extremity-limbPain - Head/headachePain - JointPain - MusclePain-Other (Specify)Pericardial effusion (non-malignant)Phosphate, serum-low (hypophosphatemia)PlateletsPleural effusion (non-malignant)Potassium, serum-high (hyperkalemia)Potassium, serum-low (hypokalemia)Prolonged QTc intervalProteinuriaPruritus/itchingPulmonary/Upper Respiratory-Other (Specify)Rash/desquamationRash: acne/acneiformRestrictive cardiomyopathyRetinal detachmentSodium, serum-high (hypernatremia)Syncope (fainting)Vaginal mucositisVision-blurred visionVomitingWatery eye (epiphora, tearing)Weight gain
Dasatinib110011231116007010013031120110120211011331000011183021031003122411110101001111113
High Dose Imatinib310000000006102021011110081001001100000210001200124131111300014000001040100001001
Standard Dose Imatinib A111003000001010200101000500000000001001101002008101001010006000000010000001100
Standard Dose Imatinib B32010000000201221001000050000000000000310020100151101032110111102002020010000000

[back to top]

Two Year Relapse-free Survival

Relapse-free survival is measured from the date of documented (possibly unconfirmed) hematologic complete remission until loss of hematologic complete remission or death from any cause. Observations are censored at the date of last contact for patients last known to be alive with report of loss of hematologic complete remission. (NCT00070499)
Timeframe: every 3 months for the first year, every six months for years 2 and 3, annually for years 4 and 5

InterventionPercent of population (Number)
Standard Dose Imatinib A83
High Dose Imatinib97
Dasatinib96
Standard Dose Imatinib B95

[back to top]

Hematologic Response

Hematologic response assesses whether patients' blood counts return to normal (NCT00070499)
Timeframe: 1 month after starting treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Standard Dose Imatinib A63
High Dose Imatinib66
Dasatinib107
Standard Dose Imatinib B112

[back to top]

2-year Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival was measured from the date of registration to study until death from any cause with observations censored at the date of last contact for patients last known to be alive. (NCT00070499)
Timeframe: Every three months for the first year, every six months in years 2 and 3, and annually for years 4 and 5

InterventionPercent of population (Number)
Standard Dose Imatinib A89
High Dose Imatinib95
Dasatinib97
Standard Dose Imatinib B98

[back to top]

Molecular Response Rate at 12 Months

Median value of baseline bcr-abl/bcr ratio from pretreatment was used as the baseline value for assessing each patient's molecular response. Molecular response criteria were: 1) not failed treatment on or before 12-month evaluation; 2) met criteria for hemalotogic response; 3) bcr-abl/bcr ration at 12-months must be 10,000 times smaller than the pretreatment ratio. (NCT00070499)
Timeframe: pretreatment and after 12 months of treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Standard Dose Imatinib A5
High Dose Imatinib14
Dasatinib27
Standard Dose Imatinib B18

[back to top]

MTD, Defined as One Dose Level Below the Dose That Induced DLT in at Least One Third of Patients at a Dose Level, Graded According to NCI CTCAE Version 3.0 (Phase I)

(NCT00074308)
Timeframe: Up to 28 days

Interventiondose level (Number)
Phase 1 = Dose Escalation2

[back to top]

Response Rate at 8 Weeks, Evaluated Using RECIST (Phase II)

"Response and progression was evaluated in this study using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST).~Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. Partial Response (PR): At least 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD." (NCT00074308)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 2 = Dose Expansion1

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival at 16 Weeks (Phase II)

Progression Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. (NCT00074308)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 2 = Dose Expansion8

[back to top]

Tumor Response

RECIST 1.0 defines complete response as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions and no evidence of new lesions documented by two disease assessments at least 4 weeks apart. Partial response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest dimensions (LD) of all target measurable lesions taking as reference the baseline sum of LD. There can be no unequivocal progression of non-target lesions and no new lesions. Documentation by two disease assessments at least 4 weeks apart is required. In the case where the ONLY target lesion is a solitary pelvic mass measured by physical exam, which is not radiographically measurable, a 50% decrease in the LD is required. These patients will have their response classified according to the definitions stated above. Complete and partial responses are included in the objective tumor response rate. (NCT00075400)
Timeframe: CT scan or MRI if used to follow lesion for measurable disease every other cycle for the first 6 months; up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Gleevec0

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) > 6 Months

Progression is defined according to RECIST v1.0 as at least a 20% increase in the sum of LD target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since study entry, the appearance of one or more new lesions, death due to disease without prior objective documentation of progression, global deterioration in health status attributable to the disease requiring a change in therapy without objective evidence of progression, or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. (NCT00075400)
Timeframe: For those patients whose disease can be evaluated by physical examination, progression was assessed prior to each 28-day cycle. CT scan or MRI if used to follow measurable disease every other cycle for the first 6 months.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Gleevec4.3

[back to top]

Overall Survival

The observed length of life from entry into the study to death or the date of last contact (NCT00075400)
Timeframe: From study entry to death or last contact, up to 5 years.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Gleevec4.1

[back to top]

Duration of Progression Free Survival

Progression is defined according to RECIST v1.0 as at least a 20% increase in the sum of LD target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since study entry, the appearance of one or more new lesions, death due to disease without prior objective documentation of progression, global deterioration in health status attributable to the disease requiring a change in therapy without objective evidence of progression, or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. (NCT00075400)
Timeframe: CT scan or MRI if used to follow lesion for measurable disease every other cycle for the first 6 months; up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Gleevec1.6099

[back to top]

Incidence of Adverse Effects as Assessed by CTCAE v 3.0

The frequency and severity of all toxicities are tabulated from submitted case report forms and summarized for review. (NCT00075400)
Timeframe: Each cycle during treatment and 30 days after treatment ends.

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
LeukopeniaNeutropeniaAnemiaAllergyHearingCardiovascularConstitutionalDermatologicEndocrineGastrointestinalGenitourinaryHemorrhageLymphaticsMetabolicNeuropathyOther neurologicOcularPainPulmonarySexual
Grade 02121722222271921522221718212121192222
Grade 1 (CTCAE v 3.0)21700193150032201211
Grade 2 (CTCAE v 3.0)019110611120121020200
Grade 3 (CTCAE v 3.0)00000010011011001000
Grade 4 (CTCAE v 3.0)00000000000001000000

[back to top] [back to top]

Confirmed Response Rate (Complete and Partial)

Number of participants with confirmed complete or partial response. Confirmed response (complete and partial) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Criteria (V1.0). Complete Response (CR) is complete disappearance of all measurable and non-measurable disease; no new lesions; no disease related symptoms; and normalization of markers and other abnormal lab values. Partial response (PR) applies only to patients with at least one measurable lesion. PR is greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of longest diameter of all target measurable lesions; no unequivocal progression of non-measurable disease and no new lesions. Confirmed response is two or more objective statuses a minimum of four weeks apart documented before progression or symptomatic deterioration. (NCT00087152)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Imatinib Mesylate & Capecitabine2

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival at 6 Months

Percentage of participants progression-free at 6 months. Progression-free survival (PFS) measured from date of registration to first observation of progressive disease (per RECIST criteria (V1.0)), death due to any cause, or symptomatic deterioration. Kaplan-Meier was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) at six months. (NCT00087152)
Timeframe: Six months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Imatinib Mesylate & Capecitabine16

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Who Achieve a Clinical Response

Clinical response = Complete Response (absence of residual disease) or Partial Response defined as no new lesions (skin or oral), or no new visceral sites of involvement (or the appearance or worsening of tumor-associated edema or effusions); AND 50% or greater decrease in the number of lesions lasting for >4 weeks; OR Complete flattening of at least 50% of all previously raised lesions OR A 50% decrease in the sum of the products of the largest perpendicular diameters of the marker lesions (NCT00090987)
Timeframe: 20-24 weeks

Interventionproportion (Number)
Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec)0.33

[back to top]

Cytogenetic Response After Crossover

Cytogenetic response was based on the prevalence of Ph+ metaphases among cells in metaphase on a bone marrow sample (aspirate/biopsy). MCyR was defined as Complete CyR (0% Ph+ cells in metaphase in bone marrow) or Partial CyR (>0% to 35% Ph+ cells in metaphase in bone marrow). (NCT00103844)
Timeframe: every 12 week period out to 2 years and off-study timepoints; restricted to postcrossover measurements

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR)Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR)Partial Cytogenetic Response (PCyR)
Dasatinib19154
Imatinib303

[back to top]

Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths and Hematologic Toxicities Prior to Crossover

AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition regardless of causal relationship with treatment. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: results in death; is life-threatening; requires or prolongs inpatient hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability; is cancer; is congenital anomaly/birth defect; results in drug dependency/abuse; is an important medical event. Graded by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0. (1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe, 4=Life-threatening/disabling, 5=Death) (NCT00103844)
Timeframe: Continuously from baseline through 2 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Any Adverse Event (AE)Grade 3-4 AEsDrug-related AEsDrug-related Grade 3-4 AEsDeath within 30 days of last doseDrug-related Serious AEsAEs leading to discontinuationFluid Retention AEs - OverallFluid Retention AEs - Superficial EdemaFluid Retention AEs - Pleural EffusionFluid Retention AEs - OtherGrade 3-4 Hematologic Toxicity - AnemiaGrade 3-4 Hematologic Toxicity - ThrombocytopeniaGrade 3-4 Hematologic Toxicity - NeutropeniaGrade 3-4 Hematologic Toxicity - Leukopenia
Dasatinib10067946212823392025920586424
Imatinib45214419031021210047198

[back to top]

Time to MCyR Prior to Crossover

Median time from first dosing date to date of MCyR (NCT00103844)
Timeframe: Baseline (within 4 weeks of Day 1), every 12 weeks, at crossover or off-study timepoints; restricted to precrossover measurements.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Dasatinib2.8
Imatinib2.8

[back to top]

Time to CHR Prior to Crossover

Median time from first dosing date to date of CHR. CHR=all of the following criteria: white blood cell count ≤ institutional upper limit of normal; platelets < 450,000/mm³; no blasts or promyelocytes in peripheral blood; < 5% myelocytes plus metamyelocytes in peripheral blood; peripheral blood basophils ≤ 20%; no extramedullary involvement. Confirmed CHR is defined as CHR maintained at least 4 weeks after first documented at ≥ Day 14. Failure to maintain criteria of CHR was defined by 2 or more consecutive records of non-response. (NCT00103844)
Timeframe: Baseline (within 4 weeks of Day 1), weekly until Week 12, then every 12 weeks until crossover or off-study; restricted to precrossover measurements.

Interventionweeks (Median)
Dasatinib2.1
Imatinib2.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR) at Week 12

Cytogenetic response was based on the prevalence of Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) metaphases among cells in metaphase on a bone marrow sample (aspirate/biopsy). MCyR was defined as Complete CyR (CCyR; 0% Ph+ cells in metaphase in bone marrow) or Partial CyR (PCyR; >0% to 35% Ph+ cells in metaphase in bone marrow). (NCT00103844)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Dasatinib36
Imatinib14

[back to top]

Major Molecular Response (MMR)

Number of participants Achieving MMR. MMR is defined as ≤3 log reduction (ie, international ratio ≤0.1), in BCR-ABL levels from the standardized baseline value of BCR-ABL: Control Gene ratio. The international ratio is obtained by multiplying BCR-ABL: Control gene ratio by the lab-specific conversion factor. (NCT00103844)
Timeframe: Pretreatment, then after every 4 weeks for 12 weeks, then after every 12 week period out to 2 years; restricted to precrossover measurements.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Dasatinib29
Imatinib6

[back to top]

Duration of MCyR at 24 Months

Percentage of participants who achieved MCyR and did not progress at 24 months. (NCT00103844)
Timeframe: 24 Months

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Dasatinib90

[back to top]

Complete Hematologic Response (CHR) at Any Time Prior to Crossover

Participants achieving CHR prior to crossover. CHR=all of the following criteria: white blood cell count ≤ institutional upper limit of normal; platelets < 450,000/mm³; no blasts or promyelocytes in peripheral blood; < 5% myelocytes plus metamyelocytes in peripheral blood; peripheral blood basophils ≤ 20%; no extramedullary involvement. Confirmed CHR is defined as CHR maintained at least 4 weeks after first documented at ≥ Day 14. Failure to maintain criteria of CHR was defined by 2 or more consecutive records of non-response. (NCT00103844)
Timeframe: Baseline (within 4 weeks of Day 1), weekly until Week 12 and then every 12 weeks until crossover or off-study; restricted to precrossover measurements.

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Dasatinib94
Imatinib40

[back to top]

CHR After Crossover

Participants achieving CHR after crossover. CHR=all of the following criteria: white blood cell count ≤ institutional upper limit of normal; platelets < 450,000/mm³; no blasts or promyelocytes in peripheral blood; < 5% myelocytes plus metamyelocytes in peripheral blood; peripheral blood basophils ≤ 20%; no extramedullary involvement. Confirmed CHR is defined as CHR maintained at least 4 weeks after first documented at ≥ Day 14. Failure to maintain criteria of CHR was defined by 2 or more consecutive records of non-response. (NCT00103844)
Timeframe: Weekly for 12 weeks, then after every 12 week period out to 2 years; restricted to postcrossover measurements.

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Dasatinib37
Imatinib13

[back to top]

Blood Sample Collection for Pharmacokinetic (PK) Analysis of Dasatinib

Number of participants from which blood samples were collected for population PK studies. (NCT00103844)
Timeframe: Day 8: pretreatment trough sample, a sample between 30 minutes and 3 hours following treatment, a sample between 5 and 8 hours following treatment, and a sample at 12 hours, prior to the next dose.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Dasatinib78

[back to top]

MCyR at Any Time Prior to Crossover

Cytogenetic response was based on the prevalence of Ph+ metaphases among cells in metaphase on a bone marrow sample (aspirate/biopsy). MCyR was defined as CCyR (0% Ph+ cells in metaphase in bone marrow) or PCyR (>0% to 35% Ph+ cells in metaphase in bone marrow). (NCT00103844)
Timeframe: Baseline (within 4 weeks of Day 1), every 12 weeks until crossover or off-study timepoints. Restricted to precrossover measurements.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
MCyR (CCyR + PCyR)CCyR (0% Ph+ cells)PCyR (>0% to 35% Ph+ cells)
Dasatinib544410
Imatinib1697

[back to top]

Duration of MCyR at 12 Months and 18 Months

Percentage of participants who achieved MCyR and did not progress at 12 and 18 months. (NCT00103844)
Timeframe: 12 months, 18 months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants. (Number)
12 months18 months
Dasatinib9290
Imatinib7474

[back to top]

Duration of Complete Hematologic Response (CHR)

Percentage of participants who achieved CHR and did not progress at specified time points. CHR=all of the following criteria: white blood cell count ≤ institutional upper limit of normal; platelets < 450,000/mm³; no blasts or promyelocytes in peripheral blood; < 5% myelocytes plus metamyelocytes in peripheral blood; peripheral blood basophils ≤ 20%; no extramedullary involvement. Confirmed CHR is defined as CHR maintained at least 4 weeks after first documented at ≥ Day 14. Failure to maintain criteria of CHR was defined by 2 or more consecutive records of non-response. (NCT00103844)
Timeframe: 12 months, 24 months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
12 months24 months
Dasatinib9284
Imatinib8273

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Experiences (AEs)

"Summary of participants who had adverse events (AEs), who discontinued treatment due to the AE, who had serious adverse events (SAEs), and who had SAEs that were related to treatments.~A serious adverse event is one that at any dose of the study drug or at any time during the period of observation:~Results in death;~Is life threatening;~Requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization;~Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity;~Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect;~Is medically important.~The Investigator assessed each AE for potential causal relationship between the event and study drug. An investigator assessment of possibly, probably or unknown relation is considered related." (NCT00114959)
Timeframe: up to 3 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
AEsDiscontinued due to AESerious AEsSAEs considered related
Homoharringtonine + Imatinib Mesylate152127

[back to top]

6 Month Progression Free Survival Rate

The percentage of patients with 6 months progression-free survival was estimated. Progression is defined, using RECIST, as a measurable increase in the smallest dimension of any target or non-target lesion, the appearance of new lesions, or the significant clinical deterioration related to progression of patient's disease. (NCT00115739)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Imatinib (Gleevec) Tablets27

[back to top]

6 Month Survival Rate

The percentage of patients still alive at 6 months was estimated. (NCT00115739)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Imatinib (Gleevec) Tablets46

[back to top]

Overall Response (Complete and Partial Response) Rate at 8 Weeks

The number of patients with Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) and Stable Disease (SD) were determined at 8 weeks. (NCT00115739)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Number of Participants with CRNumber of Participants with PRNumber of Participants with SD
Imatinib (Gleevec) Tablets024

[back to top]

Rate of Grade 3, Grade 4 and Grade 5 Toxicities Experienced by Patients With Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer Who Are Treated With Gleevec

Number of grade 3, grade 4 and grade 5 toxicities experienced by patients with anaplastic thyroid cancer who are treated with Gleevec. (NCT00115739)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days post treatment

Interventionevents (Number)
Number of Grade 3 Toxicities ReportedNumber of Grade 4 Toxicities ReportedNumber of Grade 5 Toxicities Reported
Imatinib (Gleevec) Tablets2900

[back to top]

Estimated Rate of Overall Survival (OS) in Two Treatment Arms

OS was defined as time between randomization and death due to any cause during study treatment or during follow-up after discontinuation of treatment. Estimated rate of OS was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier estimate (percent probability and 95% Confidence interval). (NCT00124748)
Timeframe: 60 months over all and follow up period

,
InterventionPercent probability (Number)
12 Months24 Months36 Months42 Months48 Months60 Months
Imatinib 400 mg98.797.496.194.794.094.0
Imatinib 800 mg99.097.895.594.893.493.4

[back to top]

Imatinib Pharmacokinetic Trough Plasma Concentration (Cmin) at Month 12

Imatinib PK trough plasma concentration (Cmin) was defined as any pre-dose Imatinib plasma concentration (NCT00124748)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionmg/mL (Mean)
Imatinib 400 mg1458.2
Imatinib 800 mg739.58

[back to top]

Mean Actual Dose Intensity Per Day

The mean actual dose intensity per day from start of treatment up to last dose or discontinuation was evaluated up to Month 36. Actual dose intensity (mg/day) = total dose/time on treatment (periods of zero dose are included) (NCT00124748)
Timeframe: start of treatment to Month 36

Interventionmg/day (Mean)
Imatinib 400 mg399.3
Imatinib 800 mg643.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) Rates at 12 Months

MMR is defined as Bcr-Abl (A fusion gene of the breakpoint cluster region [Bcr] gene and Abelson proto-oncogene [Abl] genes) transcript ratio ≤0.1% (≥ 3 log reduction of BCR-ABL transcripts from a standardized baseline), as detected by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction [RT-PCR] (performed centrally). (NCT00124748)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Imatinib 400 mg38.9
Imatinib 800 mg45.1

[back to top]

Time to First Complete Cytogenetic Response

Cytogenetic response (CyR) is the percentage of Philadelphia positive metaphases (among at least 20 metaphase cells in Bone Marrow) with Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) being 0 percent. Time to CCyR (months) = (date of first CCyR or censoring - date of randomization + 1) / 30.4375. Time to first CCyR was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00124748)
Timeframe: 60 months overall

InterventionMonths (Median)
Imatinib 400 mg10.8
Imatinib 800 mg5.8

[back to top]

Time to First Complete Hematological Response (CHR)]

Complete Hematological Response (CHR) is defined is where all of the following criteria must be present for ≥4 weeks: White Blood Cell (WBC) count <10 x 109/L, Platelet count <450 x 109/L, Basophils <5%, No blasts and promyelocytes in Peripheral Blood (PB), (Myelocytes + metamyelocytes) < 5% in PB and No evidence of extramedullary involvement. Time to CHR (months) = (date of first CHR or censoring - date of randomization + 1) / 30.4375. Time to first CHR was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00124748)
Timeframe: 60 months overall

InterventionMonths (Median)
Imatinib 400 mg1.0
Imatinib 800 mg1.0

[back to top]

Time to First Major Molecular Response

"MMR is defined as Bcr-Abl (A fusion gene of the breakpoint cluster region [Bcr] gene and Abelson proto-oncogene [Abl] genes) transcript ratio ≤0.1% (≥ 3 log reduction of BCR-ABL transcripts from a standardized baseline), as detected by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction [RT-PCR] (performed centrally).~Time to MMR (months) = (date of first MMR or censoring - date of randomization + 1) / 30.4375. Time to first MMR was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method" (NCT00124748)
Timeframe: 42 months overall

InterventionMonths (Median)
Imatinib 400 mg13.6
Imatinib 800 mg8.4

[back to top]

Estimated Rate of Progression Free Survival (PFS) in Two Treatment Arms

PFS on study which was defined as time between randomization and either (1) death due to any cause on treatment of during follow-up after discontinuation of treatment or (2) progression to accelerated phase (AP) or blast crisis (BC) on treatment during follow-up after discontinuation of study treatment. Estimated rate of PFS was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier estimate (percent probability and 95% Confidence interval). (NCT00124748)
Timeframe: 60 months over all and follow up period

,
InterventionPercent probability (Number)
12 Months24 Months36 Months42 Months48 Months60 Months
Imatinib 400 mg97.495.994.494.494.494.4
Imatinib 800 mg98.797.596.796.395.895.8

[back to top]

Estimated Rate of Progression to Accelerated Phase (AC)/Blast Crisis (BC) in Two Treatment Arms

(Accelerated Phase/Blast Crisis) AP/BC was defined as time between randomization and either (1) (Chronic Myeloid Leukemia) CML-related death (if death was primary reason for discontinuation) or (2) progression to AP or BC (during treatment). Estimated rate of AC/BC was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier estimate (percent probability and 95% Confidence interval). (NCT00124748)
Timeframe: 60 months over all and follow up period

,
InterventionPercent probability (Number)
12 Months24 Months36 Months42 Months48 Months60 Months
Imatinib 400 mg97.495.995.295.295.295.2
Imatinib 800 mg99.097.997.597.097.097.0

[back to top]

Estimated Rates of Progression Free Survival (PFS) on Treatment by Major Molecular Response (MMR)

A Landmark Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for PFS at 42 months by MMR status at 6, 12, and 18 months to investigate their prognostic value. (NCT00124748)
Timeframe: 42 months

,
InterventionPercent probability (Number)
No MMR at 6 MonthsMMR at 6 MonthsNo MMR at 12 MonthsMMR at 12 MonthsNo MMR at 18 MonthsMMR at 18 Months
Imatinib 400 mg94.810093.210096.798.7
Imatinib 800 mg95.699.094.699.397.099.3

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Duration of First Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR)

Duration of CCyR was defined as the time between date of CCyR and the earliest of either (1) loss of CCyR OR (2) (Chronic Myeloid Leukemia) CML-related death or progression to (Accelerated Phase/Blast Crisis) AP/BC during study treatment. Estimated rate of duration of first CCyR was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier estimate (percent probability and 95% Confidence interval). (NCT00124748)
Timeframe: From first complete cytogenetic response to first confirmed loss or censoring

,
InterventionPercent probability (Number)
6 Months12 Months18 Months24 Months30 Months36 Months42 Months
Imatinib 400 mg99.198.298.298.298.298.298.2
Imatinib 800 mg99.297.897.396.896.895.995.9

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Duration of First Major Molecular Response Until Confirmed Loss

Duration of MMR (months) = (date of first confirmed loss or censoring - date of MMR + 1 ) / 30.4375. Estimated rate of duration of first MMR was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier estimate (percent probability and 95% Confidence interval). (NCT00124748)
Timeframe: From First major molecular response to first confirmed loss or censoring

,
InterventionPercent probability (Number)
3 Months6 Months9 Months12 Months15 Months18 Months21 Months24 Months30 Months36 Months42 Months
Imatinib 400 mg10098.397.495.693.892.890.989.988.585.185.1
Imatinib 800 mg96.390.790.288.487.586.185.183.682.581.177.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) Rate at 12, 24, 36, 42 Months

Cytogenetic response (CyR)is the percentage of Philadelphia chromosome positive metaphases (among at least 20 metaphase cells in bone marrow (BM)) with Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) being 0 percent. (NCT00124748)
Timeframe: 12, 24, 36, 42 months

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
12 months24 months36 months42 months
Imatinib 400 mg66.976.479.080.3
Imatinib 800 mg70.276.880.681.5

[back to top]

Estimated Rate of Event Free Survival (EFS) in Two Treatment Arms

EFS on treatment was defined as time between randomization and either (1) death due to any cause during study treatment, (2) progression to accelerated phase (AP) or blast crisis (BC) on treatment, (3) loss of complete hematological response (CHR), or (4) loss of major cytogenic response (MCyR) while on treatment. Estimated rate of EFS was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier estimate (percent probability and 95% Confidence interval). (NCT00124748)
Timeframe: 60 months over all

,
InterventionPercent probability (Number)
12 Months24 Months36 Months42 Months48 Months60 Months
Imatinib 400 mg95.394.692.392.392.390.3
Imatinib 800 mg98.095.394.594.193.693.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Undetectable Levels of Bcr-Abl (A Fusion Gene of the Breakpoint Cluster Region [Bcr] Gene and Abelson Proto-oncogene [Abl] Genes) Transcripts

"Undetectable levels or Complete molecular response is defined as Bcr-Abl ratio (%) on international scale (IS) <= 0.0032% (≥ 4.5 log reduction of BCR-Abl transcripts from a standardized baseline)." (NCT00124748)
Timeframe: 12 , 24, 36 and 42 months

,
InterventionPercentage of Partcipants (Number)
12 Months24 Months36 Months42 Months
Imatinib 400 mg4.511.512.714.6
Imatinib 800 mg4.710.313.212.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) Rates at 24, 36, and 42 Months

MMR is defined as Bcr-Abl (A fusion gene of the breakpoint cluster region [Bcr] gene and Abelson proto-oncogene [Abl] genes) transcript ratio ≤0.1% (≥ 3 log reduction of BCR-ABL transcripts from a standardized baseline), as detected by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction [RT-PCR] (performed centrally). (NCT00124748)
Timeframe: 24, 36 and 42 months

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
24 months36 months42 months
Imatinib 400 mg53.552.251.6
Imatinib 800 mg50.849.850.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Hematological Response (CHR) Rates at 12, 24, 36, and 42 Months

Complete Hematologic Response (CHR) is where all of the following criteria must be present for ≥4 weeks: White Blood Cell (WBC) count <10 x 109/L, Platelet count <450 x 109/L, Basophils <5%, No blasts and promyelocytes in Peripheral Blood (PB), (Myelocytes + metamyelocytes) < 5% in PB and No evidence of extramedullary involvement. (NCT00124748)
Timeframe: 12, 24, 36, and 42 months

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
12 months24 months36 months42 months
Imatinib 400 mg94.994.996.296.2
Imatinib 800 mg93.793.794.494.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS) During the Study Duration

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented progression according to the MacDonald criteria, or death due to any cause. MacDonald criteria are standard criteria in neurooncology. Tumor assessment was made according to the adapted MacDonald criteria based on the combined evaluation of 1) assessment of the MRI scan for measurable, evaluable, and new lesions (made by the independent external expert too), 2) overall assessment of neurological performance (made by the investigator), 3) concomitant steroid use (as reported by the investigator). (NCT00154375)
Timeframe: 6 months -1 year

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
6 months12 months
Hydroxyurea Alone6.62.1
Imatinib Mesylate + Hydroxyurea (HU)5.32.1

[back to top] [back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Progression-free survival in months. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions (NCT00161213)
Timeframe: 4 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Gemcitabine and Imatinib3.9

[back to top]

Overall Survival

(NCT00161213)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Gemcitabine and Imatinib6.23

[back to top]

1-year Survival Rate

Percentage of subjects who survive up to 1 year (NCT00161213)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionpercentage of total evaluable subjects (Number)
Gemcitabine and Imatinib25.6

[back to top]

Response Rate

"Response rate as defined by a best response of Stable Disease or better." (NCT00161213)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionpercentage of total evaluable subjects (Number)
Gemcitabine and Imatinib48.6

[back to top]

Overall Survival (by Month)

Overall survival was defined as the time between start of treatment and death due to any reason. Overall survival for the participants was calculated by Kaplan-Meier estimates per month. The time was censored at the date of last contact for participants who discontinued treatment and were in survival follow-up. (NCT00171158)
Timeframe: From first dose until death of the patient, up to 14 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
12 Months24 Months36 Months48 Months60 Months72 Months84 Months96 Months108 Months120 Months132 Months144 Months156 Months
Imatinib Mesylate (STI571)32.718.715.414.59.18.47.57.57.56.65.55.55.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the number of events of death, expressed as a percentage, from the start of treatment to death, due to any reason. (NCT00171158)
Timeframe: From first dose until death of the patient, up to 14 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Imatinib Mesylate (STI571)89.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Cytogenetic Response (Complete Cytogenetic Response and Major Cytogenetic Response) to STI571

Response was evaluated from bone marrow aspirates and biopsy samples. Bone marrow cytogenetic studies were performed every 3 months during the core phase of the study, then twice yearly, then annually to evaluate Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+). Cytogenetic response was defined as the best response the participant achieved during study. Based on the percentage of Ph+ cells = (positive cells/ examined cells) x100, at each BM assessment the cytogenetic response was classified as: Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR):, 0% Ph+ cells; Partial Cytogenetic Response (PCyR):, >0 - 35% Ph+ cells; Minor: >35 - 65% Ph+ cells; and Minimal: >65 - 95% Ph+ cells, None: >95 % Ph+ cells and Not done: <20 metaphases were examined and/or response could not be assigned. Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR) was defined as sum of the CCyR plus PCyR rates. (NCT00171223)
Timeframe: Up to 6 years after the start of treatment

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Complete Cytogenetic ResponseMajor Cytogenetic Response
Cytogenetic Failure37.263.8
Hematologic Failure29.645.4
Interferon-alpha Intolerance45.865.6

[back to top] [back to top]

Time to Complete Hematologic Response to STI571

Time to Complete Hematologic Response was defined for all participants with calculated confirmed complete hematologic response as the time until first documented response (which was confirmed >= 4 weeks). Complete hematological response was defined as normalization of peripheral blood counts (WBC and platelet count < ULN at the laboratory where the analysis was performed), with a normal WBC differential, and no immature granulocytes present, lasting for 4 weeks. (NCT00171223)
Timeframe: 12 months after the start of treatment

Interventionmonths (Median)
Hematologic Failure1.64
Cytogenetic Failure0.72
Interferon-alpha Intolerance0.72

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Hematologic Response to STI571

Hematologic response was evaluated from hematology measurements in the peripheral blood. Complete hematological response was defined as normalization of peripheral blood counts [WBC and platelet count < upper limit of normal (ULN) at the laboratory where the analysis was performed], with a normal WBC differential, and no immature granulocytes present, lasting for 4 weeks. (NCT00171223)
Timeframe: 12 months after the start of treatment

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Hematologic Failure94.1
Cytogenetic Failure97.9
Interferon-alpha Intolerance91.7

[back to top]

Duration of Complete Hematologic Response to STI571

Duration of hematologic response was defined as the time from the first documentation of the complete hematologic response to the date the loss of complete hematologic response is documented. Loss of complete hematological response was defined as a rising WBC count (increased to a level above the ULN at the laboratory where the analysis was performed confirmed by two samples obtained one month apart). The mean survival time and its standard error were underestimated because the largest observation was censored and the estimation was restricted to the largest event time. Complete hematological response was defined as normalization of peripheral blood counts (WBC and platelet count < ULN at the laboratory where the analysis was performed), with a normal WBC differential, and no immature granulocytes present, lasting for 4 weeks. (NCT00171223)
Timeframe: 12 months after the start of treatment

Interventionmonths (Mean)
Hematologic Failure19.3672
Cytogenetic Failure23.9389
Interferon-alpha Intolerance24.6818

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Alive Over Time Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates

Overall survival was defined as the time from the first dose of STI571 to the death of the participant. If a participant is not known to have died, survival was censored at the time of last contact. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentage of participants at each time point was calculated. (NCT00171223)
Timeframe: 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144 and 156 months

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
12 Months24 Months36 Months48 Months60 Months72 Months84 Months96 Months108 Months120 Months132 Months144 Months156 Months
Cytogenetic Failure98.993.691.587.183.879.779.779.178.47775.473.870.1
Hematologic Failure94.788.18478.473.370.168.566.563.36159.75755.5
Interferon-alpha Intolerance97.489.583.876.373.671.467.265.965.363.862.360.860.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status

The ECOG performance status was recorded at baseline and every 3 months during the core study. The ECOG Performance Scale has 5 grades. 0 = Fully active, able to carry out all pre-disease activities; 1 = Restricted in strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of light or sedentary nature; 2 = Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out work activities. Active about 50% of waking hours; 3 = Capable of limited self-care, confined to bed/chair more than 50% of waking hours; 4 = Completely disabled; cannot carry on self-care. Totally confined to bed/chair. (NCT00171223)
Timeframe: Up to 9 months after the start of treatment

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Grade 3Grade 4
Cytogenetic Failure00
Hematologic Failure10
Interferon-alpha Intolerance00

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Cytogenetic Response in Accelerated Phase Chronic Myeloid/Myelogenous Leukemia

Bone marrow (BM) cytogenetic analysis was required at baseline, after 12 weeks (visit 22) and after 24 weeks (visit 28) to evaluate Ph chromosome positivity. In several participants, this was also done after 4 and 8 weeks. Based on the percentage of Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) cells = (positive cells/examined cells)x100, at each BM assessment the cytogenetic response was classified as: Complete, 0% Ph+ cells; Partial, >0 - 35% Ph+ cells; Minor, >35 - 65% Ph+ cells; Minimal, >65 - 95% Ph+ cells; None, >95% Ph+ cells; Not done: <20 metaphases were examined and/or response could not be assigned. Cytogenetic response was defined as confirmed complete or partial response. A BM sample was considered as assessable for cytogenetic response only if it contained ≥20 metaphases. However, an assessment of partial response was retained in a sample with <20 metaphases when it was immediately preceded or followed by a complete or partial response in another sample with ≥20 metaphases. (NCT00171249)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years after start of treatment

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Accelerated Phase Chronic Myeloid/Myelogenous Leukemia 400 mg14.3
Accelerated Phase Chronic Myeloid/Myelogenous Leukemia 600 mg24.7

[back to top]

Time to Response in Participants With Accelerated Phase Chronic Myeloid/Myelogenous Leukemia

Time to response was defined for all participants as the time until first documented response (which was confirmed ≥4 weeks later). (NCT00171249)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years after start of treatment

,
Interventionmonths (Median)
Hematologic responseCytogenetic response
Accelerated Phase Chronic Myeloid/Myelogenous Leukemia 400 mg0.952.83
Accelerated Phase Chronic Myeloid/Myelogenous Leukemia 600 mg0.992.96

[back to top]

Overall Survival by Dose in Participants With Accelerated Phase Chronic Myeloid/Myelogenous Leukemia

To evaluate overall survival, all participants were followed after the last dose of study drug every month for the first three months and thereafter every three months until death. Overall survival was calculated for all participants as the time between start of treatment and death due to any reason. The time was censored at the date of last contact for participants who discontinued treatment and were in survival follow-up. For participants without survival follow-up information, the time was censored at last available visit/treatment date. (NCT00171249)
Timeframe: 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, and 132 months after start of treatment

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
12 months24 months36 months48 months60 months72 months84 months96 months108 months120 months132 months
Accelerated Phase Chronic Myeloid/Myelogenous Leukemia 400 mg64.544.334.928.023.718.615.211.811.811.811.8
Accelerated Phase Chronic Myeloid/Myelogenous Leukemia 600 mg79.165.754.245.636.229.928.326.624.824.822.3

[back to top]

Overall Survival by Disease

To evaluate overall survival, all participants were followed after the last dose of study drug every month for the first three months and thereafter every three months until death. Overall survival was calculated for all participants as the time between start of treatment and death due to any reason. The time was censored at the date of last contact for participants who discontinued treatment and were in survival follow-up. For participants without survival follow-up information, the time was censored at last available visit/treatment date. (NCT00171249)
Timeframe: 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, and 156 months after start of treatment

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
12 months24 months36 months48 months60 months72 months84 months96 months108 months120 months132 months144 months156 months
Accelerated Phase Chronic Myeloid/Myelogenous Leukemia74.458.84839.932.226.324.121.920.620.618.918.918.9
Acute Lymphoid Leukemia10.48.38.38.38.38.38.35.65.65.65.65.65.6
Acute Myeloid/Myelogenous Leukemia0000000000000
Lymphoid Blast Crisis12.5000000000000

[back to top]

Duration of Response in Participants With Accelerated Phase Chronic Myeloid/Myelogenous Leukemia

Duration of response was defined as the time between first documented response (which was confirmed ≥4 weeks later) and the earliest date of the following: loss of response (when any of the criteria for response were no longer fulfilled); progression to blast crisis (≥30% blasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow, extramedullary involvement other than liver/spleen enlargement); discontinuation due to adverse event, laboratory abnormality, unsatisfactory therapeutic effect or death. (NCT00171249)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years after start of treatment

,
Interventionmonths (Median)
Hematologic responseCytogenetic response
Accelerated Phase Chronic Myeloid/Myelogenous Leukemia 400 mg16.4626.28
Accelerated Phase Chronic Myeloid/Myelogenous Leukemia 600 mg28.8127.63

[back to top]

Time to Progression to Blast Crisis in Participants With Accelerated Phase Chronic Myeloid/Myelogenous Leukemia

Progression to blast crisis was defined as ≥30% blasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow or as extramedullary involvement other than liver or spleen enlargement. (NCT00171249)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years after start of treatment

Interventionmonths (Median)
Accelerated Phase Chronic Myeloid/Myelogenous Leukemia 400 mg9.95
Accelerated Phase Chronic Myeloid/Myelogenous Leukemia 600 mg25.13

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Hematologic Response in Accelerated Phase Chronic Myeloid/Myelogenous Leukemia

Hematologic response was evaluated from hematology measurements in the peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) and assessments of extramedullary leukemic involvement (EMD) at physical examination. Response was defined as complete hematologic remission (CHR), no evidence of leukemia (NEL), or return to chronic phase (RTC). (NCT00171249)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years after start of treatment

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Accelerated Phase Chronic Myeloid/Myelogenous Leukemia 400 mg64.9
Accelerated Phase Chronic Myeloid/Myelogenous Leukemia 600 mg74.7

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

Defined as the proportion of patients with confirmed complete or partial response (CR or PR), recorded from date of treatment until date of recurrence or progressive disease, and assessed by RECIST v 1.1. (NCT00193180)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Intervention16

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Defined as the time from first protocol treatment to date of death due to any cause. (NCT00193180)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Intervention15.4

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS defined as the length of time, in months, that patients were alive from date of first protocol treatment until worsening of disease, assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. (NCT00193180)
Timeframe: 18 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Intervention9.3

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS), the Length of Time, in Months, That Patients Were Alive From Their First Date of Protocol Treatment Until Worsening of Their Disease

(NCT00193258)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab/Erlotinib/Imatinib8.9

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS), the Length of Time, in Months, That Patients Were Alive From Their First Date of Protocol Treatment Until Death

(NCT00193258)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab/Erlotinib/Imatinib17.2

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR), the Percentage of Patients Who Experience an Objective Benefit From Treatment

Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT00193258)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab/Erlotinib/Imatinib17

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Reduction of BCR-ABL Transcript Level > 4.5 Log From the Start of From Initiation of Treatment

reduction of BCR-ABL transcript level > 4.5 Log from the start of from initiation of treatment (NCT00210119)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Imatinib Mesylate0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Molecular Response

"A patient is considered to be in molecular response if at least one of the following conditions is observed :~- a complete molecular response at 6 months defined by PCR negativation tested on twice~OR~- reduction of BCR-ABL transcript level > 2 Log from the start of from initiation of treatment" (NCT00210119)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Imatinib Mesylate0

[back to top]

Best Tumor Response (Core)

Best tumor response was based on the Southwestern Oncology Group (SWOG) criteria. Objective tumor response assessments were categorized according to the following criteria: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), no change or stable disease (SD), progression of disease (PD), unknown where the progression has not been documented and one or more measurable or evaluable sites have not been assessed (UNK), status after resection for progression (RP), status after resection for safety (RS), status after preventive resection (RPR), progressive after first resection (PDR) and not evaluable. Any tumor assessment after surgical resection for preventative reasons was treated like tumor assessments of UNK for calculation of best response. Tumor assessments with current objective status = RP, RS or PDR were treated like assessments with objective tumor status = PD n the calculation of best response. (NCT00237185)
Timeframe: Month 36

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete responsePartial responseStable diseaseProgressive diseaseNot evaluableUnknown
Imatinib Mesylate 400 mg049101220
Imatinib Mesylate 600 mg14913632

[back to top]

Best Tumor Response (Core + Extension)

Best tumor response was based on the Southwestern Oncology Group (SWOG) criteria. Objective tumor response assessments were categorized according to the following criteria: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), no change or stable disease (SD), progression of disease (PD), unknown where the progression has not been documented and one or more measurable or evaluable sites have not been assessed (UNK), status after resection for progression (RP), status after resection for safety (RS), status after preventive resection (RPR), progressive after first resection (PDR) and not evaluable. Any tumor assessment after surgical resection for preventative reasons was treated like tumor assessments of UNK for calculation of best response. Tumor assessments with current objective status = RP, RS or PDR were treated like assessments with objective tumor status = PD n the calculation of best response. (NCT00237185)
Timeframe: Month 156

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete responsePartial responseStable diseaseProgressive diseaseNot evaluableUnknown
Imatinib Mesylate 400 mg149101120
Imatinib Mesylate 600 mg24813632

[back to top]

Time to Onset of Response (Core + Extension)

Time to response was analyzed as time to event for all participants. Participants who did not meet the definition of confirmed PR/CR were censored at the time of their last progression-free tumor assessment. (NCT00237185)
Timeframe: Date of first imatinib dose to the date of the first tumor assessment that was later confirmed to be at least a partial response during the core and extension periods, up to 156 months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Imatinib Mesylate 400 mg3
Imatinib Mesylate 600 mg3

[back to top]

Time to Onset of Response (Core)

Time to response was analyzed as time to event for all participants. Participants who did not meet the definition of confirmed PR/CR were censored at the time of their last progression-free tumor assessment. (NCT00237185)
Timeframe: Date of first imatinib dose to the date of the first tumor assessment that was later confirmed to be at least a partial response during the core period, up to 36 months.

Interventionweeks (Median)
Imatinib Mesylate 400 mg13
Imatinib Mesylate 600 mg12

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure (Core + Extension)

Time to treatment failure was analyzed as time to event for all participants. Participants who had neither progressed, died nor discontinued from the trial for any reason other than the condition no longer required therapy were censored for analysis at the time of their last tumor assessment. (NCT00237185)
Timeframe: Date of first imatinib dose to date of earliest occurrence of progression, death due to any cause, or discontinuation from the trial for any reason other than the condition no longer required therapy during the core and extension periods, up to 156 month.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Imatinib Mesylate 400 mg19
Imatinib Mesylate 600 mg19

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure (Core)

Time to treatment failure was analyzed as time to event for all participants. Participants who had neither progressed, died nor discontinued from the trial for any reason other than the condition no longer required therapy were censored for analysis ate the time of their last tumor assessment. (NCT00237185)
Timeframe: Date of first imatinib dose to date of earliest occurrence of progression, death due to any cause, or discontinuation from the trial for any reason other than the condition no longer required therapy during the core period, up to 36 months.

Interventionweeks (Median)
Imatinib Mesylate 400 mg84
Imatinib Mesylate 600 mg84

[back to top]

Time to Progression (Core + Extension)

Time to progression was analyzed as time to event for all participants. Participants who had neither progressed, died nor discontinued from the trial for any reason other than the condition no longer required therapy were censored for analysis at the time of their last tumor assessment. (NCT00237185)
Timeframe: Date of first imatinib dose to date of progression or death due to disease indication or discontinuation due to unsatisfactory therapeutic effect during the core and extension periods, up to 156 months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Imatinib Mesylate 400 mg19.8
Imatinib Mesylate 600 mg25.5

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) (Core + Extension)

Progression free survival was analyzed as a time to event for each participant. If a participant had no event, then the PFS was censored at the last tumor assessment. (NCT00237185)
Timeframe: Date of first imatinib dose to earliest date of progression, resection due to safety/progression, death due to any cause or discontinuation due to unsatisfactory therapeutic effect during the core and extension periods, up to 156 months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Imatinib Mesylate 400 mg19.3
Imatinib Mesylate 600 mg25.2

[back to top]

Overall Survival (Core)

Overall survival was analyzed as time to event for all participants. Participants who did not die were censored at the last date known alive, which is the last date of any study medication, laboratory sample, tumor assessment, adverse event end date or date of last contact. (NCT00237185)
Timeframe: Date of first imatinib dose to the date of death during the core period, up to 36 months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Imatinib Mesylate 400 mgNA
Imatinib Mesylate 600 mgNA

[back to top]

Overall Survival (Core + Extension)

Overall survival was analyzed as time to event for all participants. Participants who did not die were censored at the last date known alive, which is the last date of any study medication, laboratory sample, tumor assessment, adverse event end date or date of last contact. (NCT00237185)
Timeframe: Date of first imatinib dose to the date of death during the core and extension periods, up to 156 months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Imatinib Mesylate 400 mg55.9
Imatinib Mesylate 600 mg57.1

[back to top]

Duration of Response (Core)

Duration of response was analyzed as time to event for all participants whose best response was at least a PR. The onset of response was the first tumor assessment that was subsequently confirmed to constitute at least a partial best response. The end of response was the first tumor assessment noting PD. (NCT00237185)
Timeframe: Date of confirmed best PR or CR to date of confirmed disease progression during the core period, up to 36 months.

Interventionweeks (Median)
Imatinib Mesylate 400 mg113
Imatinib Mesylate 600 mg123

[back to top]

Duration of Response (Core + Extension)

Duration of response was analyzed as time to event for all participants whose best response was at least a PR. The onset of response was the first tumor assessment that was subsequently confirmed to constitute at least a partial best response. The end of response was the first tumor assessment noting PD. (NCT00237185)
Timeframe: Date of confirmed best PR or CR to date of confirmed disease progression during the core and extension periods, up to 156 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Imatinib Mesylate 400 mg27
Imatinib Mesylate 600 mg30

[back to top]

To Collect Matched Tumor Tissue of Trial Participants With Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans Before and After Treatment With Imatinib for Future Use in cDNA Microarray and Tissue Array Studies.

To obtain matched tumor tissue samples of trial participants dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP)for the purpose of determining whether imatinib mesylate affects autocrine/paracrine stimulated signal transduction through the platelet-derived growth factor receptor pathway in DFSP by comparing the level of phosphorylated platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFRB) in DFSP after up to 2 weeks of treatment with imatinib to the level of phosphorylated PDGFRB pre-treatment. (NCT00243191)
Timeframe: Prior to and after 2-weeks of imatinib therapy

Interventionpaired tumor tissue samples (Number)
Imatinib18

[back to top]

Overall Time To Progression (TTP)

TTP is the amount of time from date of registration to date of first documentation of progression or symptomatic deterioration. For progression, one or more of the following must occur: (1) 20% increase in the sum of longest diameters of target measurable lesions over smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease during therapy) using the same techniques as baseline. (2) Increase in PSA by at least 25% from baseline in patients whose PSA did not decrease, and of 50% from nadir in patients whose PSA decreased with a confirmation 3 weeks later. (3) Unequivocal progression of non-measurable disease in the opinion of the treating physician (an explanation must be provided). (4) Appearance of any new lesion/site. (5) Death due to disease without prior documentation of progression and without symptomatic deterioration, which is defined as global deterioration of health status requiring discontinuation of treatment without objective evidence of progression. (NCT00251225)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer Patients6.4

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS is the amount of time in months from the date of registration to the date of death from any cause. (NCT00251225)
Timeframe: Up to 60 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer Patients23.1

[back to top]

Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Response Rate

PSA response rate is the number of participants who experienced a best response of: complete response, CR (PSA less than or equal to 0.2 ng/mL, documented two or more times, a minimum of four weeks apart), partial response, PR (a decline in PSA by at least 50%, confirmed by a second PSA value four or more weeks later) or stable disease (does not qualify for CR, PR, Progression or Symptomatic Deterioration, at least 6 weeks after registration) / total number of analyzable patients. (NCT00251225)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer Patients72.4

[back to top]

Response: One Log Decrease in BCR-ABL

Molecular response defined as reduction by one log of the circulating peripheral blood for reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) transcripts of BCR-ABL (tumor-specific oncogenic fusion protein) after two consecutive measurements. RT-PCR performed at 3 month intervals. Response categorized as either 'No Decrease' or 'Decrease' if one log reduction in BCR-ABL detected. (NCT00267085)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
DecreaseNo Decrease
CML Vaccine37

[back to top]

2-year Relapse Free Survival Rate

(NCT00278876)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Imatinib Mesylate93.6

[back to top]

2-year Overall Survival Rate

(NCT00278876)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Imatinib Mesylate97.9

[back to top]

Toxicity Profile

Number of patients who experienced toxicity from study treatment to evaluate the safety and tolerability of adjuvant imatinib (NCT00278876)
Timeframe: Monitoring of adverse events will be continued for at least 28days following the last dose of study treatment, up to 3 years.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Imatinib Mesylate47

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Who Had Clinical Benefit

Patients who had clinical benefit were patients with a best response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) lasting for more than 6 months from the start of treatment until the first documented disease progression (PD) or death from any cause. (PD) was defined as ≥ 25% increase in size of the sum of the products of the largest perpendicular diameters of the target tumors compared to the smallest value recorded at or after baseline. SD was defined as insufficient tumor shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR and no increase in lesions which would qualify as PD. (NCT00290771)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of study (Month 24)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Imatinib 600 mg + Hydroxyurea 1000 mg9.9
Imatinib 1000 mg + Hydroxyurea 1000 mg6.0
All Patients - Imatinib 600 or 1000 mg + Hydroxyurea 1000 mg8.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With an Objective Overall Response (OOR)

Patients with an OOR were those whose best response to treatment was a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR) assessed with magnetic resonance imaging. A patient had a CR if the target tumors disappeared. A patient had a PR if there was a ≥ 50% reduction in the sum of the products of the largest perpendicular diameters of the target tumors compared to the baseline value. A best response of CR required at least 2 determinations of CR at least 4 weeks apart. A best response of PR required at least 2 determinations of PR or better at least 4 weeks apart (and not qualifying for CR). (NCT00290771)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of study (Month 24)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Imatinib 600 mg + Hydroxyurea 1000 mg3.8
Imatinib 1000 mg + Hydroxyurea 1000 mg3.0
All Patients - Imatinib 600 or 1000 mg + Hydroxyurea 1000 mg3.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Surviving at Months 6, 12, and 24

Patients not known to have died were censored at the time of last survival follow-up. (NCT00290771)
Timeframe: Months 6, 12, and 24

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
6 Months12 Months24 Months
All Patients - Imatinib 600 or 1000 mg + Hydroxyurea 1000 mg50.029.713.9
Imatinib 1000 mg + Hydroxyurea 1000 mg50.931.320.3
Imatinib 600 mg + Hydroxyurea 1000 mg49.228.510.7

[back to top]

Duration of Objective Overall Response (OOR)

Duration of OOR only included patients whose best overall response was complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). The start date was the date of the first documented response (CR or PR); the end date was the date of the first documented disease progression (PD) or death from any cause. (PD) was defined as ≥ 25% increase in size of the sum of the products of the largest perpendicular diameters of the target tumors compared to the smallest value recorded at or after baseline. If a patient had not progressed or died, the duration of OOR was censored at the time of the last OOR assessment. (NCT00290771)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of study (Month 24)

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Imatinib 600 mg + Hydroxyurea 1000 mg41.1
Imatinib 1000 mg + Hydroxyurea 1000 mg32.1
All Patients - Imatinib 600 or 1000 mg + Hydroxyurea 1000 mg37.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Progression-free Survival at Months 6 and 12

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the start of treatment to the date of the first documented disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause. (PD) was defined as ≥ 25% increase in size of the sum of the products of the largest perpendicular diameters of the target tumors compared to the smallest value recorded at or after baseline. If a patient had not progressed or died, progression-free survival was censored at the time of the last overall response assessment. (NCT00290771)
Timeframe: Months 6 and 12

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
6 Months12 Months
All Patients - Imatinib 600 or 1000 mg + Hydroxyurea 1000 mg10.65.3
Imatinib 1000 mg + Hydroxyurea 1000 mg9.93.3
Imatinib 600 mg + Hydroxyurea 1000 mg11.26.9

[back to top]

Number of Patients With at Least 1 Adverse Event

An adverse event (AE) is any undesirable sign, symptom, or medical condition occurring after starting study drug even if the event is not considered to be related to study drug. Study drug refers to imatinib or hydroxyurea. The study treatment is the combination of these two study drugs. (NCT00290771)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of study (Month 24)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Imatinib 600 mg + Hydroxyurea 1000 mg129
Imatinib 1000 mg + Hydroxyurea 1000 mg98
All Patients - Imatinib 600 or 1000 mg + Hydroxyurea 1000 mg227

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With On-study AEs of Special Interest

GI=gastrointestinal. AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. Grade 1=mild; Grade 2=moderate; Grade 3=severe and undesirable; Grade 4=life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5=death. Percentages based on the number of participants with a specific grade at baseline. Participants without on-study test values for a particular laboratory analyte are not included in the reporting of that analyte. (NCT00320190)
Timeframe: Months 1 to 12, continuously, and Months 12 to 24, continuously

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Fluid retention (Any grade)Fluid retention (Grades 3-5)Fluid retention: Superficial edema (Any grade)Fluid retention: Superficial edema (Grades 3-5)Fluid retention: Generalized edema (Any grade)Fluid retention: Generalized edema (Grades 3-5)Hemorrhage (Any grade)Hemorrhage (Grades 3-5)Hemorrhage: GI bleeding (Any grade)Hemorrhage: GI bleeding (Grades 3-5)Hemorrhage: Other bleeding (Any grade)Hemorrhage: Other bleeding (Grades 3-5)Diarrhea (Any grade)Diarrhea (Grades 3-5)Skin rash (Any grade)Skin rash (Grades 3-5)
Dasatinib, 100 mg5.30005.3000000026.3042.10
Imatinib, 800 mg38.57.730.807.77.715.407.707.7030.8015.40

[back to top] [back to top]

Time to Progression

Sample size of 40 patients per group was needed to detect an 8 month increase in time to progression with the combination (80% power, alpha =.05, 2-sided). (NCT00323063)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Gemcitabine Hydrochloride)2
Arm II (Gemcitabine Hydrochloride + Imatinib)2.5

[back to top]

Response Rate (Complete and Partial Response)

Overall response rate was evaluated every 2 cycles (six weeks) for both groups using international criteria by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECISTv1.0) for target lesions and were assessed by CT or MRI. Response rates were defined as complete response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; partial response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions. Overall response(OR) defined as OR=CR + PR (NCT00323063)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm I (Gemcitabine Hydrochloride)9.1
Arm II (Gemcitabine Hydrochloride + Imatinib)9.1

[back to top]

Time to Progression

(NCT00323362)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionmonths (Mean)
Gemcitabine Hydrochloride and Imatinib Mesylate2.77

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Who Meet Critieria for Response

"Response is considered Partial Response or Complete Response as per RECIST criteria.~Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD.~Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions.~Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started." (NCT00323362)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of patients who responded (Number)
Gemcitabine Hydrochloride and Imatinib Mesylate0

[back to top]

1-year Survival

Accrual duration is 2 years with an additional year for assessment of 1-year survival. Outcome measure time frame is about 3 years. (NCT00323362)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Gemcitabine Hydrochloride and Imatinib Mesylate35

[back to top]

Overall Survival

From date of registration (defined as date of randomization) to date of death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive are censored at last date of contact. Note: median was not reached in the Imatinib arm due to limited follow-up data. (NCT00324987)
Timeframe: up to 7 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Imatinib + Bevacizumab30
Imatinib0

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

From date of registration (defined as date of randomization) to date of first observation of progressive disease, death due to any cause or symptomatic deterioration. Patients last known to be alive and progression free are censored at last date of contact. Progression is defined as one or more of the following: 20% increase in the sum of longest diameters of target measurable lesions over smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease during therapy), provided at least one target lesion does NOT demonstrate uniform hypoattenuation over > 90% of maximal cross sectional area; unequivocal progression of non-measurable disease; appearance of new lesion/site that is not uniformly hypoattenuating; a hyperattenuating region within a previously cystic/uniformly hypoattenuating lesion will be considered progressive disease if hyperattenuating region is either >= 1 cm in longest diameter or round/oval and forms acute margins with border of target lesion; death due to disease. (NCT00324987)
Timeframe: Up to 7 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Imatinib + Bevacizumab30
Imatinib81

[back to top] [back to top]

Median Time to Progression

(NCT00331409)
Timeframe: Time to progression

Interventionmonths (Median)
Everolimus and Imatinib Mesylate2.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

"Toxicity assessments will be obtained as follows:~Cycle 1: Weeks 1,2,3 Cycle 2: Weeks 6,9 Cycle 3: Weeks 12, 15 Cycle 4: Weeks 18, 21 Cycle 5: Weeks 24, 27 Cycle 6+: Every visit during these cycles~Safety assessments will consist of evaluating adverse events and serious adverse events." (NCT00331409)
Timeframe: Duration of study, Up to 4 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Everolimus and Imatinib Mesylate19

[back to top]

Number of Subjects That Demonstrated a Reduction in Tumor Measurements.

Number of subjects that received at least one post-baseline scan that demonstrated a reduction in sum target lesions per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. (NCT00331409)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Everolimus and Imatinib Mesylate5

[back to top]

Overall Number of Participants Who Achieve a Response Rate (Complete Response, Partial Response, and Stable Disease) at 3 Months

(NCT00331409)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Everolimus and Imatinib Mesylate18

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival at 3 Months

(NCT00331409)
Timeframe: 3 months post 1st dose

Interventionmonths (Median)
Everolimus and Imatinib Mesylate2.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety (Second-line Treatment)

A serious adverse event is any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that: results in death, is life-threatening, requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant (NCT00333840)
Timeframe: 144 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Imatinib to IFN-a + Ara-C2
IFN-a + Ara-C to Imatinib160

[back to top]

Kaplan Meier Estimates of Event Free Survival (All Randomized Participants)

"Event-free survival is defined as the time between randomization and the earliest of any of the following events on treatment:~progression to Accelerated Phase (AP) or Blast Crisis (BC)~loss of Complete Hematological Response (CHR)~loss of Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR) confirmed~loss of Major Cytogenetic Response (MCyR) unconfirmed~increase in white blood cell count (WBC) if approved by the Study Management Committee (SMC)~death (due to any cause when reported as primary reason for discontinuation of treatment).~Kaplan Meier estimates of the percentage of participants with Event Free Survival at the given time point was calculated. This outcome was measured in all randomized patients, regardless of whether crossover occurred, i.e., events that occurred in patients, who had crossed over, were attributed following crossover to the original randomized treatment." (NCT00333840)
Timeframe: 12,24,36,48,60,72,84,96,108,120,132 and 144 months

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
12 months (n = 553, 553)24 months (n = 505, 332)36 months (n = 448, 263)48 months (n = 415, 241)60 months (n = 395, 223)72 months (n = 376, 207)84 months (n = 352, 181)96 months (n = 334, 166)108 months (n = 301, 141)120 months (n = 269, 130)132 months (n = 257, 124)144 months (n = 143, 76)
IFN-a + Ara-C79.470.067.063.761.960.159.058.356.656.656.651.8
Imatinib (STI571)96.689.685.383.983.283.082.081.079.979.679.679.6

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Overall Survival (All Randomized Participants)

Overall survival was defined as the time between date of randomization and death due to any cause. The time was censored at last examination date for patients who were still being treated and at date of last contact for patients who discontinued treatment. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the percentage of participants at each time point was calculated. This outcome was measured in all randomized patients, regardless of whether crossover occurred, i.e., events that occurred in patients, who had crossed over, were attributed following crossover to the original randomized treatment. (NCT00333840)
Timeframe: 12,24,36,48,60,72,84,96,108,120,132 and 144 months

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
12 months (n = 553, 553)24 months (n = 542, 512)36 months (n = 518, 471)48 months (n = 492, 441)60 months (n = 475, 411)72 months (n = 461, 388)84 months (n = 446, 373)96 months (n = 430, 358)108 months (n = 391, 315)120 months (n = 368, 299)132 months (n = 356, 288)144 months (n = 250, 199)
IFN-a + Ara-C97.793.689.887.785.483.883.181.479.978.877.775.4
Imatinib (STI571)98.996.092.490.489.488.286.685.484.383.382.881.3

[back to top]

Kaplan Meier Estimates of Time to Progression to Accelerated Phase (AP) or Blast Crisis (BC) (All Randomized Participants)

Time to progression to AP/BC is defined as the time between randomization and either of the following events on treatment: death (due to CML when reported as primary reason for discontinuation of treatment) or progression to Accelerated Phase or Blast Crisis and is censored at last examination date for patients without event. No data after discontinuation of study treatment was included. The Kaplan Meier estimates of the percentage of participants with survival without progression to AP/BC at the given time point was calculated. This outcome was measured in all randomized patients, regardless of whether crossover occurred, i.e., events that occurred in patients, who had crossed over, were attributed following crossover to the original randomized treatment. (NCT00333840)
Timeframe: 12,24,36,48,60,72,84,96,108,120,132 and 144 months

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
12 months (n = 553, 553)24 months (n = 513, 388)36 months (n = 461, 337)48 months (n = 431, 311)60 months (n = 409, 289 )72 months (n = 384, 265)84 months (n = 358, 236)96 months (n = 338, 220)108 months (n = 305, 189)120 months (n = 272, 175)132 months (n = 259, 165)144 months (n = 145, 94)
IFN-a + Ara-C92.990.087.984.783.583.182.482.482.482.482.482.4
Imatinib (STI571)98.595.794.093.192.792.792.792.492.192.192.192.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (Second-line Treatment)

Major Molecular Response was determined using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) laboratory test and was defined as BCR-ABL protein transcripts of ≤ 0.1% according to the international scale. (NCT00333840)
Timeframe: 12,24,36,48,60,72,84,96,108,120,132 and 144 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
12 months (n = 86)24 months (n = 62)36 months (n = 130)48 months (n = 216)60 months (n = 174)72 months (n = 146)84 months (n = 139)96 months (n = 138)108 months (n = 120)120 months (n = 84)132 months (n = 31)144 months
IFN-a + Ara-C to Imatinib51.269.478.581.986.291.186.387.090.085.790.3NA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (First-line Treatment)

Major Molecular Response was determined using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) laboratory test and was defined as BCR-ABL protein transcripts of ≤ 0.1% according to the international scale. (NCT00333840)
Timeframe: 12,24,36,48,60,72,84,96,108,120,132 and 144 months

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
12 months (n= 305, 83)24 months (n= 102, 12)36 months (n= 68, 7)48 months (n= 305, 12)60 months (n= 316, 10)72 months (n= 292, 9)84 months (n= 247, 8)96 months (n= 228, 4)108 months (n= 233, 0)120 months (n= 204, 0)132 months (n= 168, 0)144 months (n= 1, 0)
IFN-a + Ara-C9.625.028.658.3100.088.987.5100.0NANANANA
Imatinib (STI571)50.269.676.577.088.088.091.992.593.693.192.3100.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Event Free Survival Events (All Randomized Participants)

"Event-free survival is defined as the time between randomization and the earliest of any of the following events on treatment:~progression to Accelerated Phase (AP) or Blast Crisis (BC)~loss of Complete Hematological Response (CHR)~loss of Major Cytogenic Response (MCyR) confirmed~loss of Major Cytogenic Response (MCyR) unconfirmed~increase in white blood cell count (WBC) if approved by the Study Management Committee (SMC)~death (due to any cause when reported as primary reason for discontinuation of treatment).~The percentage of participants with Event Free Survival events in each category was calculated. This outcome was measured in all randomized patients, regardless of whether crossover occurred, i.e., events that occurred in patients, who had crossed over, were attributed following crossover to the original randomized treatment." (NCT00333840)
Timeframe: 144 months

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Participants with eventsProgression to AP or BCLoss of CHRLoss of MCyR (confirmed)Loss of MCyR (unconfirmed)Increase of WBCDeath
IFN-a + Ara-C32.212.87.65.41.13.41.8
Imatinib (STI571)17.96.92.74.20.90.23.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Best Cytogenetic Response (Second-line Treatment)

"Bone marrow aspirate was performed to evaluate cytogenetic results (percentage of Ph chromosome (Ph+) containing metaphases) and the amount of blasts and promyelocytes in bone marrow to establish cytogenetic response.~Major Cytogenetic Response= Complete Response or Partial Response. Complete Cytogenetic Response= 0 % of Ph+ metaphases (out of 20 metaphases). Partial Cytogenetic Response= > 0 and ≤ 35 % Ph+ metaphases (out of 20 metaphases). The percentage of participants with cytogenetic response in each category was calculated." (NCT00333840)
Timeframe: 144 months

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Major Cytogenic ResponseComplete Cytogenic ResponsePartial Cytogenic Response
IFN-a + Ara-C to Imatinib86.081.05.0
Imatinib to IFN-a + Ara-C14.37.17.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Best Cytogenetic Response (First-line Treatment)

"Bone marrow aspirate was performed to evaluate cytogenetic results (percentage of Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) metaphases) and amount of blasts and promyelocytes in bone marrow to establish cytogenetic response.~Major Cytogenetic Response= Complete Response or Partial Response. Complete Cytogenetic Response= 0 % of Ph+ metaphases (out of 20 metaphases). Partial Cytogenetic Response= > 0 and ≤ 35 % of Ph+ metaphases (out of 20 metaphases). The percentage of participants with cytogenetic response in each category was calculated." (NCT00333840)
Timeframe: 144 months

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Major Cytogenic ResponseComplete Cytogenic ResponsePartial Cytogenic Response
IFN-a + Ara-C23.311.611.8
Imatinib (STI571)89.082.86.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety (First-line Treatment)

A serious adverse event is any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that: results in death, is life-threatening, requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant (NCT00333840)
Timeframe: 144 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Imatinib (STI571)226
IFN-a + Ara-C163

[back to top]

Overall Survival of Participants

This sample size would provide an estimate of the objective response rate (ORR) 95% confidence intervals for the ORR and CBR were calculated using the exact binomial method. Among patients with CR or PR as the best overall response, duration of response (DOR) was defined as the time from which measurement criteria were met for CR or PR until the date of progression. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from study enrollment to disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS data were censored at the time of removal from study. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from study registration to death from any cause. Information on vital status was collected following study completion through July 23, 2018 and was used in the determination of OS. Among patients with SD as the best overall response, duration of SD was defined as the time from study enrollment to disease progression or removal from study. (NCT00338728)
Timeframe: From the registration until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, or withdraw of study consent, whichever occurred first assessed up to 182 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Progression-free survival (PFS)Overall Survival (OS)
Letrozole and Imatinib Mesylate8.744.3

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

Among participants with CR or PR as the best overall response, duration of response (DOR) was defined as the time from which measurement criteria were met for CR or PR until the date of progression. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from study enrollment to disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS data were censored at the time of removal from study. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from study registration to death from any cause. Information on vital status was collected following study completion through July 23, 2018 and was used in the determination of OS. Among patients with SD as the best overall response, duration of SD was defined as the time from study enrollment to disease progression or removal from study. (NCT00338728)
Timeframe: From the registration until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, or withdraw of study consent, whichever occurred first assessed up to 182 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)SD (including non-CR/Non-PD)>/=24 weeksSD (including non-CR/Non-PD)Progressive DiseaseNon-Evaluable
Letrozole and Imatinib Mesylate05168115

[back to top]

Median Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Time in months from the start of study treatment to the date of first progression according to Macdonald criteria, or to death due to any cause. Patients alive who had not progressed as of the last follow-up had PFS censored at the last follow-up date. Median PFS was estimated using a Kaplan-Meier curve. (NCT00354913)
Timeframe: From the date of study treatment initiation to the date of the first documented progression or death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 69 months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Imatinib Mesylate+Hydroxyurea7

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival (OS)

Time in months from the start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. Patients alive at last follow-up are censored as of that follow-up date. Median OS was estimated using a Kaplan-Meier curve. (NCT00354913)
Timeframe: From the date of study treatment initiation to the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 69 months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Imatinib Mesylate+Hydroxyurea66

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

Percentage of participants with an objective response (complete response or partial response). Per modified Macdonald criteria and assessed by MRI, complete response (CR) was the disappearance of all target lesions and partial response (PR) was a ≥50% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions. Objective response = CR+PR. (NCT00354913)
Timeframe: 69 Months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Imatinib Mesylate+Hydroxyurea0

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival at 6 Months

Percentage of participants surviving six months from the start of study treatment without progression of disease. PFS was defined as the time from the date of study treatment initiation to the date of the first documented progression according to the Macdonald criteria, or death due to any cause. (NCT00354913)
Timeframe: From the date of study treatment initiation to the date of the first documented progression or death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 69 months. For each participant, PFS was assessed at 6 months after treatment initiation.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Imatinib Mesylate+Hydroxyurea61.9

[back to top]

Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths, and Discontinuations Due to AEs

An AE is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered an investigational (medicinal) product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an important medical event. (NCT00362466)
Timeframe: From 2 weeks prior to randomization through Month 36. At least every 4 weeks until all study-related toxicities resolve to baseline, stabilize, or are deemed irreversible.

,
Interventionevents (Number)
AEsSAEsAEs leading to DiscontinuationDeaths
Dasatinib3000
Imatinib1000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Pain Progression

Pain progression defined as a 50% or more increase in MPQ-PPI score (0=no pain to 5=excruciating pain) or analgesic use from baseline for at least 3 consecutive weeks. Analgesic use scores were based on 1 point per non narcotic dose of medication and 4 points per dose of narcotic medication. (NCT00372567)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 up to 26

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Sunitinib (Phase 3)14
Imatinib10

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Pain Relief Response

Pain relief response defined as a 50% or more reduction in the McGill Pain Questionaire - Present Pain Intensity (MPQ-PPI) score (0=no pain to 5=excruciating pain) and/or analgesic use from baseline for at least 3 consecutive weeks. Analgesic use scores were based on 1 point per non narcotic dose of medication and 4 points per dose of narcotic medication. (NCT00372567)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 up to 26

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Sunitinib (Phase 3)2
Imatinib4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Objective Response of Complete Response or Partial Response

Number of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as a greater than or equal to 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. (NCT00372567)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 up to 26

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Sunitinib (Phase 3)5
Imatinib2

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DR)

"Time from start of first documentation of objective response(complete or partial response) that was subsequently confirmed to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.~Confirmed complete response (CR) and partial response (PR)according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as a greater than or equal to 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions." (NCT00372567)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 up to 26

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Sunitinib (Phase 3)18.3
Imatinib19.8

[back to top]

Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score - Imatinib Treatment Arm

"EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire assessed health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component rated current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicated better health state (no problems); 3 indicated worst health state (eg, confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigned utility value for each domain in the profile. Score was transformed and results in a total score ranged 0.21 to 1.000; higher score indicated a better health state." (NCT00372567)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 28 of each cycle

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 1 (n=22)Cycle 2 (n=23)Cycle 3 (n=18)Cycle 4 (n=18)Cycle 5 (n=17)Cycle 6 (n=12)Cycle 7 (n=12)Cycle 8 ( (n=11)Cycle 9 (n=7)Cycle 10 (n=7)Cycle 11 (n=3)
Imatinib0.800.850.820.860.830.840.810.680.860.860.88

[back to top]

Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D)- Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Sunitinib Treatment Arm

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire assessed health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rated current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicated a better health state. (NCT00372567)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 28 of each cycle

InterventionScores on a Scale (Mean)
Cycle 1 (n=30)Cycle 2 (n=27)Cycle 3 (n=21)Cycle 4 (n=23)Cycle 5 (n=16)Cycle 6 (n=16)Cycle 7 (n=12)Cycle 8 (n=11)Cycle 9 (n=7)Cycle 10 (n=6)Cycle 11 (n=3)Cycle 12 (n=2)
Sunitinib (Phase 3)78.1377.1978.5280.1784.2585.8178.2584.7382.5781.0081.0086.50

[back to top]

Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D)- Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Imatinib Treatment Arm

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire assessed health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rated current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicated a better health state. (NCT00372567)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 28 of each cycle

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 1 (n=22)Cycle 2 (n=22)Cycle 3 (n=20)Cycle 4 (n=18)Cycle 5 (n=15)Cycle 6 (n=11)Cycle 7 (n=12)Cycle 8 (n=10)Cycle 9 (n=7)Cycle 10 (n=7)Cycle 11 (n=3)
Imatinib75.4173.6472.8576.1468.9368.2767.0863.7074.6476.8675.33

[back to top]

Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Score- Sunitinib Treatment Arm

"EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component rated current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicated better health state (no problems); 3 indicated worst health state (eg, confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigned utility value for each domain in profile. Score was transformed and results in a total score ranged 0.21 to 1.000; higher score indicated a better health state." (NCT00372567)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 28 of each cycle

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 1 (n=30)Cycle 2 (n=27)Cycle 3 (n=21)Cycle 4 (n=23)Cycle 5 (n=16)Cycle 6 (n=16)Cycle 7 (n=12)Cycle 8 (n=11)Cycle 9 (n=6)Cycle 10 (n=5)Cycle 11 (n=3)Cycle 12 (n=2)
Sunitinib (Phase 3)0.900.840.840.850.890.900.840.830.760.780.830.93

[back to top]

Time to Tumor Response (TTR)

Time from date of randomization to first documentation of objective tumor response (partial or complete response). Confirmed complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as a greater than or equal to 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. (NCT00372567)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 up to 26

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Sunitinib (Phase 3)4.1
Imatinib40.1

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)

TTF included death for any reason, treatment termination due to intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurred first. (NCT00372567)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 up to 26

InterventionMonths (Median)
Sunitinib (Phase 3)8.2
Imatinib6.3

[back to top]

Time to Pain Relief Response (TTPR)

Pain relief response defined as a 50 percent (%) or more reduction in the McGill Pain Questionaire - Present Pain Intensity (MPQ-PPI) score (0=no pain to 5=excruciating pain) and/or analgesic use from baseline for at least 3 consecutive weeks. Analgesic use scores were based on 1 point per non narcotic dose of medication and 4 points per dose of narcotic medication. (NCT00372567)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 up to 26

InterventionDays (Median)
Sunitinib (Phase 3)34.0
Imatinib22.0

[back to top]

Time to Pain Progression (TTPP)

TTPP is the number of days from randomization to the first documentation of pain progression (defined as a 50% or more increase in MPQ-PPI score [0=no pain to 5=excruciating pain] or analgesic use from baseline for at least 3 consecutive weeks). Analgesic use scores were based on 1 point per non narcotic dose of medication and 4 points per dose of narcotic medication. (NCT00372567)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 up to 26

InterventionDays (Median)
Sunitinib (Phase 3)22.0
Imatinib99.0

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

Time from randomization to the first documentation of tumor progression or death due to any cause in the absence of documented tumor progression, whichever was earlier. (NCT00372567)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 5, and every 8 weeks until Year 2

InterventionMonths (Median)
Sunitinib8.6
Imatinib6.4

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Time from date of randomization to the date of death. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored to the last date the participant was known to be alive. (NCT00372567)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 2 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Sunitinib (Phase 3)12.9
ImatinibNA

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (Complete and Partial Responses) as Assessed by RECIST Criteria

Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR (NCT00408460)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 of courses 2, 4 and 6

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Enzyme Inhibitor, Chemotherapy)11

[back to top]

Overall Survival

(NCT00408460)
Timeframe: Every 3 months for 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment (Enzyme Inhibitor, Chemotherapy)7.3

[back to top]

Time to Tumor Progression

Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions (NCT00408460)
Timeframe: Baseline and every 2 months post treatment until the date of first documented tumor progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 5 years.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment (Enzyme Inhibitor, Chemotherapy)3.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Immunologic Response

Immunologic Response (immune response) is defined as an increase of ≥ 0.5 PR1-HLA-A2 [human leukocyte antigen-A2 (HLA-A2)] tetramer cells / μl at the time of either the 3rd or 4th vaccination compared to the pre study absolute PR1-HLA-A2 tetramer cells / μl. Participants receive a total of 4 vaccinations over a period of 18 weeks (i.e., one vaccination each on weeks 0, 3, 6, and 18). Participants assessed after 3rd and 4th vaccination for immunologic response. (NCT00415857)
Timeframe: Period of 18 weeks (i.e., one vaccination each on weeks 0, 3, 6, and 18).

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PR1 + Imatinib0
PR1 + Imatinib + Interferon0

[back to top]

Molecular Response Rate

Molecular response rate is number of respondents compared to total participants. Molecular Response is defined as a greater than a one-log reduction of Breakpoint Cluster Region-Abelson Murine Leukemia (BCR-ABL) transcript levels by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from the baseline level at the time vaccination was initiated, or a disappearance of BCR-ABL transcripts, as measured by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), occurring within 6 months from the last vaccination. Participants receive a series of 4 vaccinations administered at 3-week intervals and the fourth (final) vaccination administered 3 months after the third vaccination with blood draw to test PCR following every 3 months to test the level of leukemia in the blood and to see if disease is responding to the vaccine. (NCT00415857)
Timeframe: Baseline to 18 weeks, up to 6 months post final vaccination for overall study participation period.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PR1 + Imatinib0
PR1 + Imatinib + Interferon0

[back to top]

Response Rate (Major and Complete Cytogenetic Response)

Rate is defined as number of participants with response of Major and Complete cytogenetic response out of total study participants. Response evaluated at one and 3 months from start of therapy, then every 3 months in patients with response, for one year, then every 6-12 months. Responses classified according to suppression of Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome by cytogenetic analysis: a) Complete cytogenetic response - Not Ph positive; b) Major cytogenetic response - Ph positive 1-34% of pretreatment value; c) Minor cytogenetic response - Ph positive 35-65% of pretreatment value; d) Minimal cytogenetic response - Ph positive 65-99% of pretreatment value; e) No cytogenetic response - Ph positive 100% of pretreatment value. (NCT00415909)
Timeframe: Evaluated at baseline (pretreatment) up to 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Baseline1 Month3 Months12 Months
TALL-104 + IM0673333

[back to top]

Overall Clinical Benefit

Overall Clinical Benefit was measured as the sum of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and stable disease (SD). (NCT00424385)
Timeframe: up to 20 weeks

Interventionpercentage of evaluable participants (Number)
Imatinib + Sorafenib Cohort 0 & 120

[back to top]

Number of Patients Experiencing Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT's)

Eligible patients were enrolled in one of 4 cohorts, where each cohort allowed 3 evaluable patients to be on study, patients withdrawn from treatment for reasons other than toxicity were not considered evaluable. If one of the three evaluable patients experienced a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) the cohort was expanded to 6 evaluable patients. Patients will receive both study drugs on escalated dosing schedule until the maximum of 400 mg PO BID is reached for both drugs or toxicity is established. If 2 out of six evaluable patients experience a dose limiting toxicity this would show that the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) was the dose from the prior cohort. (NCT00424385)
Timeframe: up to 20 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Imatinib + Sorafenib Cohort 01
Imatinib + Sorafenib Cohort 12

[back to top]

Time to Disease Progression (TTP)

Medium TTP is 2 months (range 1-5). 10 patients were evaluable for disease progression for these patients occurred between 1-5 months after starting the study. The TTP was calculated per protocol. For radiographic assessment Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) was used. Complete response = disappearance of all lesions. Partial response (PR)=30% or greater decrease in sum of longest diameter of measureable lesions SD. Lesions have no sufficient decrease for progressive disease and no sufficient increase to meet Progressive Disease (PD). PD more than 20% increase in sum of longest diameter of measurable lesions or 2 or more new bone mets. prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assessment for patients with measurable disease, PSA progression in the absence of measurable disease progression will not be considered progressive disease. (NCT00424385)
Timeframe: up to 5 cycles, an average of 20 weeks, from the day of first treatment until the date of the last dose of study drug

Interventionmonths (Median)
Imatinib + Sorafenib Cohort 0 & 12

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from study entry to death or date last known alive. (NCT00424515)
Timeframe: Patients were followed long-term every 3 months until first progression, death or lost to follow-up. Median survival follow-up was 10.6 months (range 3.7-27.1).

Interventionmonths (Median)
Amplified KIT11.9
Mutated KIT12.9

[back to top]

Best Overall Response

Best overall response (BOR) on treatment was based on RECIST 1.0 criteria. For target lesions, complete response (CR) is complete disappearance of all target lesions and partial response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. CR or PR confirmation required within 4 weeks. Progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum LD of target lesions from smallest sum LD as reference or the appearance of one or more new lesions. Stable disease (SD) is neither meeting PR or PD. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. CR is disappearance of all non-target lesions. (NCT00424515)
Timeframe: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline, after 6-weeks, and at 2-month intervals on treatment. Mean treatment duration was 4 months (range 1-11; amplified/mutated 3m/ 6m).

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive Disease
Amplified KIT0029
Mutated KIT0733

[back to top]

Time to Progression

Time to progression (TTP) based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the duration of time from study entry to documented disease progression (PD) requiring removal from the study. Per RECIST 1.0 criteria: progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. (NCT00424515)
Timeframe: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline, after 6-weeks, and at 2-month intervals on treatment and every 3 months long-term. Mean treatment duration was 4 months (range 1-11; amplified/mutated 3m/ 6m).

Interventionmonths (Median)
Amplified KIT3.4
Mutated KIT3.9

[back to top]

Time to Progression-free Survival

Progression-free survival, defined as the time from first administration of study drugs to the first PSA value of a PSA non-responder. Responders will be censored with date of PSA response for the analysis. The median time to PSA progression free survival was not achieved (NCT00427999)
Timeframe: every 4 weeks up to 24 weeks

Interventiondays (Median)
STI571+ Pioglitazone+ Etoricoxib + Dexamethasone + TreosulfaneNA

[back to top]

Overall Survival Rate

Overall survival (OS) is defined as time from randomization to death from any cause or last date known alive. The median time to overall survival rate was not achieved (NCT00427999)
Timeframe: every 4 weeks up to 24 weeks

Interventiondays (Median)
STI571+ Pioglitazone+ Etoricoxib + Dexamethasone + TreosulfaneNA

[back to top]

Quality of Life Assessed With EORTC-30

Health-related quality of life was assessed with the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC-30) questionnaire and was presented descriptively. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire including following sub-scales: global health status, functional scales (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social activity), symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain) and single items (dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhoea and financial difficulties). Scores are averaged for each scale and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score indicates better quality of life on global health status and functional scales and worse quality of life on symptom scales and financial difficulty scale. (NCT00427999)
Timeframe: baseline and Final Visit (week 24)

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Baseline: financial difficulties (n=49)Baseline: appetite loss (n=50)Baseline: dyspnea (n=49)Baseline: constipation (n=50)Baseline: role functioning (n=50)Baseline: insomnia (n=49)Baseline: cognitive functioning (n=49)Baseline: diarrhea (n=50)Baseline: physical functioning (n=50)Baseline: pain (n=50)Baseline: emotional functioning (n=49)Baseline: social functioning (n=49)Baseline: fatigue (n=50)Baseline: global health status (n=49)Baseline: nausea & vomiting (n=50)Final Visit: financial difficulties (n=42)Final Visit: appetite loss (n=43)Final Visit: dyspnea (n=43)Final Visit: constipation (n=43)Final Visit: role functioning (n=43)Final Visit: insomnia (n=42)Final Visit: cognitive functioning (n=43)Final Visit: diarrhea (n=43)Final Visit: physical functioning (n=43)Final Visit: pain (n=43)Final Visit: emotional functioning (n=43)Final Visit: social functioning (n=43)Final Visit: fatigue (n=43)Final Visit: global health status (n=43)Final Visit: nausea & vomiting (n=43)
STI571+ Pioglitazone+ Etoricoxib + Dexamethasone + Treosulfane11.616.020.414.074.034.087.19.381.732.364.672.432.960.026.019.024.038.86.255.431.781.813.266.726.061.864.046.051.044.6

[back to top]

PSA Response Rate

To investigate the effect of a treatment with Imatinib mesylate, Pioglitazone , Etoricoxib, and Dexamethasone in combination with metronomic chemotherapy (Treosulfane) on the PSA response rate in patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer. A patient will be defined as a responder if a PSA decline of at least 50%, which must be confirmed by a second PSA value 4 weeks later, is observed. A patient will be defined as a non-responder if PSA has not decreased during treatment. Non-response is defined as a 25% increase over the baseline on-study which is confirmed (equal or more) by a second value 4 weeks apart. The absolute increase must account for > 5 ng/ml. (NCT00427999)
Timeframe: up to 24 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PSA responder - NoPSA responder - Yes
STI571+ Pioglitazone+ Etoricoxib + Dexamethasone + Treosulfane3823

[back to top]

Time to PSA Response

Time to PSA response, defined as the time from first administration of study drugs to the first PSA value of a confirmed PSA response. Non-responders will be censored with date of final visit/premature discontinuation for the analysis. Median time to PSA response was not achieved (NCT00427999)
Timeframe: every 4 weeks up to 24 weeks

Interventiondays (Median)
STI571+ Pioglitazone+ Etoricoxib + Dexamethasone + TreosulfaneNA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reaching Overall Survival

Overall survival from diagnosis (NCT00458848)
Timeframe: At 60 months

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Philadelphia Positive, Imatinib Only in Induction Therapy48.8

[back to top]

Number of Patients Reaching Complete Hematological Response After Induction Therapy

(NCT00458848)
Timeframe: At the end of induction, day +50

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Philadelphia Positive, Imatinib Only in Induction Therapy49

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reaching Disease Free Survival

(NCT00458848)
Timeframe: At 60 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Philadelphia Positive, Imatinib Only in Induction Therapy45.8

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

Response will be evaluated in this study using the new international criteria proposed by the RECIST Committee. A Simon two-stage minimax design will be employed. (NCT00470470)
Timeframe: Every 6 weeks for the first 3 courses and then every 12 weeks thereafter

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable DiseaseProgression of Disease
Treatment (Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy)13147

[back to top]

Time to Progression

Progression will be evaluated in this study using the new international criteria proposed by the RECIST Committee. Time to progression will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00470470)
Timeframe: Time from the treatment start to the date of disease progression

Interventionweeks (Mean)
Treatment (Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy)12

[back to top]

Number of Responders With Confirmed Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) From Local Investigator's Assessment Based on Treatment Crossover Analysis Set

The best overall response (CR/PR) must be confirmed by at least two determinations at least 4 weeks apart before progression. Using modified RECIST criteria, a Complete Response is defined as disappearance of all lesions, and a Partial Response is defined as either 1) at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions and no new lesions or progression of non-target lesions or 2) disappearance of all target lesions but persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s). (NCT00471328)
Timeframe: Up to 34 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Control/Cross Over to Nilotinib1

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) From Central Radiology Review Based on Primary Analysis (Data Cut-off: June, 2008)

Progression-free survival (PFS) is the time from date of randomization to the date of first documented progression or death due to any cause. If a participant has not had an event, progression-free survival is censored at the time of last adequate tumor assessment. Progression is defined according to Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (modified RECIST) criteria as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, worsening of the non-target lesions or the appearance of one or more new lesions. (NCT00471328)
Timeframe: Up to 16 months

Interventiondays (Median)
Nilotinib109.0
Control/Cross Over to Nilotinib111.0

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) From Local Investigator's Assessment Based on Treatment Crossover Analysis Set

PFS is defined as the time from the first date of cross-over to nilotinib therapy from the control arm to the date of the first observation of documented disease progression. Tumor assessment was based on the local investigator's measurement using Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (modified RECIST) criteria. Progression is defined according to modified RECIST criteria as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, worsening of the non-target lesions or the appearance of one or more new lesions. (NCT00471328)
Timeframe: Up to 34 months

Interventiondays (Median)
Control/Cross Over to Nilotinib84

[back to top]

Overall Survival for Treatment Crossover Analysis Set

For patients who crossed-over to nilotinib from the control arm, the overall survival was the time from the first dose date of nilotinib after switching from control arm to the date of death due to any cause. If death was not observed, the OS was censored at the latest date the patient was known to be alive. (NCT00471328)
Timeframe: Up to 34 months

Interventiondays (Median)
Control/Cross Over to Nilotinib231

[back to top]

Overall Survival During Core and Extension Phases of the Study

Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. If a participant is not known to have died, survival will be censored at the date of last contact. This analysis included both Core and Extension data as well as survival follow up data. (NCT00471328)
Timeframe: Up to 50 months (including core, extension and follow up period)

Interventiondays (Median)
Nilotinib361
Control/Cross Over to Nilotinib300

[back to top]

Overall Survival Based on Primary Analysis (Data Cut-off:June, 2008)

Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. If a participant is not known to have died, survival will be censored at the date of last contact. (NCT00471328)
Timeframe: Up to 16 months

Interventiondays (Median)
Nilotinib332.0
Control/Cross Over to Nilotinib280.0

[back to top]

Overall Clinical Benefit (Complete Response [CR]/Partial Response [PR] or Stable Disease [SD]) From Central Radiology Review Based on Primary Analysis (Data Cut-off: June, 2008)

The overall clinical benefit includes the best overall responses of CR, PR, or SD. The best overall responses of CR/PR must be confirmed by at least two determinations at least 4 weeks apart before progression. The best overall response of SD must have at least one SD (or better) at least 6 weeks (or 6 months or 12 months as applicable) after randomization but before progression. (NCT00471328)
Timeframe: Up to 16 months

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
CR/PR/SDCR/PR/SD lasting > 6 monthsCR/PR/SD lasting > 12 months
Control/Cross Over to Nilotinib44.61.20
Nilotinib52.77.30.6

[back to top]

Overall Clinical Benefit (Complete Response [CR]/Partial Response [PR] or Stable Disease [SD]) From Local Investigator's Assessment Based on Treatment Crossover Analysis Set

The overall clinical benefit includes the best overall responses of CR, PR, or SD. The best overall responses of CR/PR must be confirmed by at least two determinations at least 4 weeks apart before progression. The best overall response of SD must have at least one SD (or better) at least 6 weeks (or 6 months or 12 months as applicable) after randomization but before progression. (NCT00471328)
Timeframe: Up to 34 months

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
CR/PR/SDCR/PR/SD lasting > 6 monthsCR/PR/SD lasting > 12 months
Control/Cross Over to Nilotinib37.37.56.0

[back to top]

Number of Responders With Confirmed Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) From Central Radiology Review During Primary Analysis (Data Cut-off: June, 2008)

The best overall response is the best response recorded from randomization until disease progression. The CR/PR must be confirmed by at least two determinations at least 4 weeks apart before progression. Using modified RECIST criteria, a Complete Response is defined as disappearance of all lesions, and a Partial Response is defined as either 1) at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions and no new lesions or progression of non-target lesions or 2) disappearance of all target lesions but persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s). (NCT00471328)
Timeframe: Up to 16 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Nilotinib1
Control/Cross Over to Nilotinib0

[back to top]

Rate of a ≥ 4 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts in Nilotinib Treatment Arms With Imatinib

Molecular response of <=0.01% is defined as BCR-ABL ratio (%) on IS <= 0.01% (corresponds to >=4 log reduction of BCR-ABL transcripts from standardized baseline value) (NCT00471497)
Timeframe: at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 and 120 months

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Molecular response of <=0.01% at 6 monthsMolecular response of <=0.01% at 12 monthsMolecular response of <=0.01% at 24 monthsMolecular response of <=0.01% at 36 monthsMolecular response of <=0.01% at 48 monthsMolecular response of <=0.01% at 60 monthsMolecular response of <=0.01% at 72 monthsMolecular response of <=0.01% at 84 monthsMolecular response of <=0.01% at 96 monthsMolecular response of <=0.01% at 108 monthsMolecular response of <=0.01% at 120 months
Imatinib 400 mg QD1.13.910.214.119.831.127.229.028.332.228.3
Nilotinb 300 mg BID8.912.124.529.433.047.944.342.939.740.435.5
Nilotinib 400 mg BID5.78.922.123.829.943.445.240.638.134.933.8

[back to top]

Rate of Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) on Nilotinib 400 mg BID Therapy After Insufficient Response During Core Treatment and Switch to Extension Phase (Extension)

Rate of CCyR is defined as the percentage of participants in complete cytogenetic response (CCyR). CcyR is defined as 0% of Ph+ metaphases in the bone marrow. (NCT00471497)
Timeframe: Overall for Extension study for approx. 10 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Imatinib 400 mg QD72.9
Nilotinb 300 mg BID73.1
Nilotinib 400 mg BID66.7

[back to top]

Rate of Major Molecular Response (MMR) on Nilotinib 400 mg BID Therapy After Insufficient Response During Core Treatment and Switch to Extension Phase (Extension)

Rate of MMR is defined as the percentage pf participants in MMR (reduction of ≥ 3 logs in BCR-ABL transcripts compared to the standardized baseline established in IRIS, or ≤ 0.1% BCR-ABL/ABL % by international scale and measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR)) (NCT00471497)
Timeframe: Overall for Extension study for approx. 10 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Imatinib 400 mg QD64.6
Nilotinb 300 mg BID73.1
Nilotinib 400 mg BID66.7

[back to top]

Rate of Hematologic Response on Nilotinib 400 mg BID Therapy After Insufficient Response During Core Treatment and Switch to Extension Phase (Extension)

Rate of hematologic response is defined as the percentage of participants in complete hematologic response (defined as the following present for at least 4 weeks: WBC count <10 x 109/L, Platelet count <450 x 109/L, Basophils <5%, No blasts and promyelocytes in peripheral blood, Myelocytes + metamyelocytes < 5% in peripheral blood, No evidence of extramedullary disease, including spleen and liver). (NCT00471497)
Timeframe: Overall for Extension study for approx. 10 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Imatinib 400 mg QD83.3
Nilotinb 300 mg BID84.6
Nilotinib 400 mg BID66.7

[back to top]

Actual Dose-intensity

Actual dose intensity is defined as total dose over time on treatment (NCT00471497)
Timeframe: approx. 11 years

Interventionmg/day (Median)
Imatinib 400 mg QD400.0
Nilotinb 300 mg BID591.1
Nilotinib 400 mg BID758.9

[back to top]

Duration of CCyR

Duration of CCyR is defined as the time from date of first documented CCyR to the earliest date of loss of CCyR. (NCT00471497)
Timeframe: up to 72 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Imatinib 400 mg QDNA
Nilotinb 300 mg BIDNA
Nilotinib 400 mg BIDNA

[back to top]

All Collected Deaths

On treatment deaths were collected from first patient first visit up to 28 days after study treatment discontinuation (approx. 11 years). Patients with cancer were also followed up for overall survival until the end of the trial (to collect any deaths occurring more than 28 days after study drug discontinuation). In this study, one death was collected after randomization but before the participant received study drug. (NCT00471497)
Timeframe: From FPFV up to 28 days post treatment (approx. 11 years), From FPFV to LPLV (approx. 12 years)

,,
Interventiondeaths (Number)
On-treatment deathsTotal deaths
Imatinib 400 mg QD429
Nilotinb 300 mg BID1032
Nilotinib 400 mg BID523

[back to top]

Duration of Both a ≥ 4 and ≥ 4.5 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts

It is defined as the time from the date of first documented BCR-ABL ratio of ≤ 0.01% and ≤ 0.0032% to the earliest of the following: Loss of BCR-ABL ratio of ≤ 0.01% and ≤ 0.0032%, respectively, CML-related death or progression to AP/BC during study treatment. The time will be censored at last molecular assessment (PCR) date for patients for whom none of the above events is reported. (NCT00471497)
Timeframe: approx. 11 years

,,
InterventionMonths (Median)
duration of first molecular response of <=0.01%duration of first molecular response of <=0.0032%
Imatinib 400 mg QDNANA
Nilotinb 300 mg BIDNANA
Nilotinib 400 mg BIDNANA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With MMR at 12 Months Between All 3 Arms by Sokal Risk Group With Imputation

MMR is defined as the percentage of participants in MMR (reduction of ≥ 3 logs in BCR-ABL transcripts compared to the standardized baseline established in IRIS, or ≤ 0.1% BCR-ABL/ABL % by international scale and measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR)) at 12 months. (NCT00471497)
Timeframe: 12 months

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Sokal risk group = LowSokal risk group = Interm.Sokal risk group = High
Imatinib 400 mg QD26.022.816.7
Nilotinb 300 mg BID40.850.541.0
Nilotinib 400 mg BID53.440.032.1

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Cmin

Cmin is defined as the minimum serum concentration after dose (NCT00471497)
Timeframe: any day after day 8 up to cycle 12 (each cycle = 28 days) and after at least 3 consecutive days without dose interruption or dose modification at pre-dose (0 hour), 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 5 hours, 8 hours, and 12 hours after dose administration

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Nilotinb 300 mg BID1430
Nilotinib 400 mg BID915

[back to top]

Rate of a ≥ 4.5 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts in Nilotinib Treatment Arms With Imatinib

This is the molecular response of <=0.0032% is defined as BCR-ABL ratio (%) on IS <= 0.0032% (corresponds to >=4.5 log reduction of BCR-ABL transcripts from standardized baseline value) (NCT00471497)
Timeframe: at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 and 120 months

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Molecular response of <=0.0032% at 6 monthsMolecular response of <=0.0032% at 12 monthsMolecular response of <=0.0032% at 24 monthsMolecular response of <=0.0032% at 36 monthsMolecular response of <=0.01032 at 48 monthsMolecular response of <=0.0032% at 60 monthsMolecular response of <=0.0032% at 72 monthsMolecular response of <=0.0032% at 84 monthsMolecular response of <=0.01% at 96 monthsMolecular response of <=0.0032% at 108 monthsMolecular response of <=0.0032% at 120 months
Imatinib 400 mg QD0.00.42.88.110.219.818.019.123.324.021.2
Nilotinb 300 mg BID3.54.612.413.816.332.331.231.631.931.927.0
Nilotinib 400 mg BID1.45.07.812.117.129.528.828.832.428.125.6

[back to top]

Time to Both a ≥ 4 and ≥ 4.5 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts

Time to BCR-ABL ratio of ≤ 0.01% and ≤ 0.0032% is defined as: date of first BCR-ABL ratio of ≤ 0.01% and ≤ 0.0032% - date of randomization +1. (NCT00471497)
Timeframe: up to 84 months

,,
InterventionMonths (Median)
time to first molecular response of <=0.01%time to first molecular response of <=0.0032%
Imatinib 400 mg QD30.4637.29
Nilotinb 300 mg BID19.3832.46
Nilotinib 400 mg BID22.7035.94

[back to top]

Rate of Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) in Nilotinib Treatment Arms With Imatinib at 12 Months and Beyond 12 Months

"CCyR is defined as 0% Ph+ metaphases based on at least 20 metaphases from bone marrow cytogenetics. Patients with no CCyR as the best response by any specific time point, all missing cytogenetic evaluations by that time point or Ph- at baseline are combined as Nocomplete cytogenetic response." (NCT00471497)
Timeframe: 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72 months (M)

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
CCyR at M12CCyR at M24CCyR at M36CCyR at M48CCyR at M60CCyR at M72
Imatinib 400 mg QD55.561.514.111.32.51.8
Nilotinb 300 mg BID70.266.09.28.92.81.8
Nilotinib 400 mg BID68.766.212.813.52.82.8

[back to top]

Rate of Hematologic Response

Rate of hematologic response is defined as the percentage of participants in complete hematologic response (defined as the following present for at least 4 weeks: WBC count <10 x 109/L, Platelet count <450 x 109/L, Basophils <5%, No blasts and promyelocytes in peripheral blood, Myelocytes + metamyelocytes < 5% in peripheral blood, No evidence of extramedullary disease, including spleen and liver). (NCT00471497)
Timeframe: 12 months, 24 months, Overall on Core study (approx. 11 years)

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Complete hematologic response (CHR) by M12CHR by M24CHR Overall
Imatinib 400 mg QD93.393.694.0
Nilotinb 300 mg BID90.190.892.2
Nilotinib 400 mg BID89.090.490.7

[back to top]

Rate of MMR at 6 Months and Beyond in All 3 Treatment Arms

MMR is defined as the percentage of participants in MMR (reduction of ≥ 3 logs in BCR-ABL transcripts compared to the standardized baseline established in IRIS, or ≤ 0.1% BCR-ABL/ABL % by international scale and measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR)) at 6 months and beyond up to 120 months based on final data. (NCT00471497)
Timeframe: 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108 and 120 months

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
MMR at M6MMR at M12MMR at M24MMR at M36MMR at M48MMR at M60MMR at M72MMR at M84MMR at M96MMR at M108MMR at M120
Imatinib 400 mg QD12.022.337.538.543.849.141.740.337.537.536.4
Nilotinb 300 mg BID33.044.761.759.259.962.852.550.046.143.337.9
Nilotinib 400 mg BID29.543.159.157.355.261.257.750.946.340.239.1

[back to top]

Time to Progression to AP/BC

Time to progression to AP/BC is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of event defined as the first documented disease progression to AP/BC or the date of CML related death. (NCT00471497)
Timeframe: approx. 11 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Imatinib 400 mg QDNA
Nilotinb 300 mg BIDNA
Nilotinib 400 mg BIDNA

[back to top]

Rates of Durable MMR at 24 Months Between All 3 Arms

Durable MMR at 24 months is defined as having MMR both at 12 months and at 24 months, and with no documented loss of MMR between these 12 month and 24 month time points. (NCT00471497)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Imatinib 400 mg QD20.5
Nilotinb 300 mg BID41.8
Nilotinib 400 mg BID39.1

[back to top]

Rate of Major Molecular Response (MMR) at 12 Months Between Two Nilotinib Arms

MMR is defined as the percentage of participants in MMR (reduction of ≥ 3 logs in BCR-ABL transcripts compared to the standardized baseline established in IRIS, or ≤ 0.1% BCR-ABL/ABL % by international scale and measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR)) at 12 months based on 12-month cut-off interim data. (NCT00471497)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Nilotinb 300 mg BID44.3
Nilotinib 400 mg BID42.7

[back to top]

Time to First MMR

Time to MMR is defined as time from date of randomization to the date of the first documented MMR in nilotinib treatment arms, compared to imatinib in adult patients with Ph+ CML in CP. (NCT00471497)
Timeframe: up to 84 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Imatinib 400 mg QD14.13
Nilotinb 300 mg BID8.31
Nilotinib 400 mg BID8.53

[back to top]

Time to Complete Cytogenic Response (CCyR)

Time to CCyR is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documented CCyR (NCT00471497)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Imatinib 400 mg QD8.5
Nilotinb 300 mg BID5.7
Nilotinib 400 mg BID5.7

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of event defined as the first documented disease progression to AP/BC or the date of death from any cause occurring in the core or extension study, or during the follow-up period after discontinuation of core or extension study (NCT00471497)
Timeframe: approx. 11 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Imatinib 400 mg QDNA
Nilotinb 300 mg BIDNA
Nilotinib 400 mg BIDNA

[back to top]

Rate of a ≥ 4 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts on Nilotinib 400 mg BID Therapy After Insufficient Response During Core Treatment and Switch to Extension Phase (Extension)

Molecular response of <=0.01% is defined as BCR-ABL ratio (%) on IS <= 0.01% (corresponds to >=4 log reduction of BCR-ABL transcripts from standardized baseline value) (NCT00471497)
Timeframe: Overall for Extension study for approx. 10 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Imatinib 400 mg QD43.8
Nilotinb 300 mg BID57.7
Nilotinib 400 mg BID33.3

[back to top]

Rate of ≥ 4.5 Log Reduction in BCR-ABL Transcripts on Nilotinib 400 mg BID Therapy After Insufficient Response During Core Treatment and Switch to Extension Phase (Extension)

Molecular response of <=0.0032% is defined as BCR-ABL ratio (%) on IS <= 0.0032% (corresponds to >=4.5 log reduction of BCR-ABL transcripts from standardized baseline value) (NCT00471497)
Timeframe: Overall for Extension study for approx. 10 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Imatinib 400 mg QD35.4
Nilotinb 300 mg BID38.5
Nilotinib 400 mg BID33.3

[back to top]

Presence of Newly Observed BCR-ABL Mutations in Patients Post-baseline and Correlate With Response to Treatment With Imatinib and Nilotinib (Extension)

This is the percentage of patients with any emergent mutation on extension treatment. The mutation comprised of T315T, less sensitive to nilotinib, unknown and sensitive to nilotinib. (NCT00471497)
Timeframe: Overall for Extension study for approx. 10 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Imatinib 400 mg QD20.8
Nilotinb 300 mg BID11.5
Nilotinib 400 mg BID33.3

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Tmax

Tmax is defined as the sampling time when maximum measured serum concentration occurs (NCT00471497)
Timeframe: any day after day 8 up to cycle 12 (each cycle = 28 days) and after at least 3 consecutive days without dose interruption or dose modification at pre-dose (0 hour), 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 5 hours, 8 hours, and 12 hours after dose administration

Interventionhour (h) (Median)
Nilotinb 300 mg BID1.47
Nilotinib 400 mg BID1.50

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Cmax

Cmax is defined as the maximum serum concentration after dose (NCT00471497)
Timeframe: any day after day 8 up to cycle 12 (each cycle = 28 days) and after at least 3 consecutive days without dose interruption or dose modification at pre-dose (0 hour), 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 5 hours, 8 hours, and 12 hours after dose administration

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Nilotinb 300 mg BID1555
Nilotinib 400 mg BID1440

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: AUC0-last

AUC0-last is defined as area under concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable sample, calculated by log-linear trapezoidal method (NCT00471497)
Timeframe: any day after day 8 up to cycle 12 (each cycle = 28 days) and after at least 3 consecutive days without dose interruption or dose modification at pre-dose (0 hour), 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 5 hours, 8 hours, and 12 hours after dose administration

Interventionh.ng/mL (Median)
Nilotinb 300 mg BID14446
Nilotinib 400 mg BID11689

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date death. Up to 10 calendar years of follow up from the date when the last patient randomized received the first dose of study drug in all active treatment arms of adult patients with Ph+ CML CP. (NCT00471497)
Timeframe: approx. 11 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Imatinib 400 mg QDNA
Nilotinb 300 mg BIDNA
Nilotinib 400 mg BIDNA

[back to top]

Major Molecular Response Rate (MMR) at 12 Months Between All 3 Arms - With Imputation

MMR is defined as the percentage of participants in MMR (reduction of ≥ 3 logs in BCR-ABL transcripts compared to the standardized baseline established in IRIS, or ≤ 0.1% BCR-ABL/ABL % by international scale and measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR)) at 12 months. (NCT00471497)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Imatinib 400 mg QD22.3
Nilotinb 300 mg BID44.3
Nilotinib 400 mg BID42.7

[back to top]

Event-free Survival (EFS)

Event-free survival is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first occurrence of any of the following: death due to any cause (if death is the primary reason for discontinuation), progression to AP or BC, loss of PCyR, loss of CCyR, loss of CHR (NCT00471497)
Timeframe: approx. 11 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Imatinib 400 mg QDNA
Nilotinb 300 mg BIDNA
Nilotinib 400 mg BIDNA

[back to top]

Duration of MMR

Duration of MMR for patients with MMR is defined as the time between date of MMR and the earliest of the following: loss of MMR, CML-related death or progression to AP/BC during study treatment The time will be censored at last molecular assessment (PCR) date for patients for whom none of the above events is reported. (NCT00471497)
Timeframe: approx. 11 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Imatinib 400 mg QDNA
Nilotinb 300 mg BIDNA
Nilotinib 400 mg BIDNA

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Death During the Core

In this analysis patients with all (serious and non -serious) adverse events, and death were reported. See Safety Section. (NCT00477269)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Paients with AE(s)DeathSAE(s)
Placebo29311
STI57127312

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Death During the Extension

In this analysis patients with all (serious and non -serious) adverse events, and death were reported. See Safety Section. (NCT00477269)
Timeframe: 72 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any AE(s)DeathSAE(s)
All Patients22416

[back to top]

Blood Gas Measurement - PvO2 at Baseline and Study Completion

The right heart catheter assessment was performed to assess Blood Gas Measurements in pulmonary hypertension, including PvO2 levels at baseline and Study completion Week 24. (NCT00477269)
Timeframe: Baseline, and Study completion (Week 24)

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline n=14,14Week 24 n=11,11
Placebo34.7032.65
STI57133.1635.56

[back to top]

Blood Gas Measurement - pH at Baseline and Study Completion

The right heart catheter assessment was performed to assess Blood Gas Measurements in pulmonary hypertension, including pH levels at baseline and Study completion Week 24. The pH scale measures how acidic or basic a substance is. It ranges from 0 to 14. A pH of 7 is neutral. A pH less than 7 is acidic, and a pH greater than 7 is basic. (NCT00477269)
Timeframe: Baseline, and Study completion (Week 24)

,
InterventionpH scale (Mean)
Baseline n=24,23Week 24 n=17,17
Placebo7.447.46
STI5717.437.44

[back to top]

Blood Gas Measurement - PaO2 at Baseline and Study Completion

The right heart catheter assessment was performed to assess Blood Gas Measurements in pulmonary hypertension, including PaO2 levels at baseline and Study completion Week 24. (NCT00477269)
Timeframe: Baseline, and Study completion (Week 24)

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline n=22,21Week 24 n=16,17
Placebo63.7570.13
STI57163.3672.49

[back to top]

Blood Gas Measurement - PaCO2 at Baseline and Study Completion

The right heart catheter assessment was performed to assess Blood Gas Measurements in pulmonary hypertension, including PaCO2 levels at baseline and Study completion Week 24. (NCT00477269)
Timeframe: Baseline, and Study completion (Week 24)

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline n=23,21Week 24 n=16,17
Placebo30.0230.23
STI57132.7033.36

[back to top]

Blood Gas Measurement - Arterial Saturation at Baseline and Study Completion

The right heart catheter assessment was performed to assess Blood Gas Measurements in pulmonary hypertension, including Arterial Saturation levels at baseline and Study completion Week 24. (NCT00477269)
Timeframe: Baseline, and Study completion (Week 24)

,
Interventionpercentage of saturation (Mean)
Baseline n=19,16Week 24 n=14,15
Placebo91.8191.78
STI57187.9992.89

[back to top]

Mean Pulmonary Artery Pressure (PAP) at Baseline and Study Completion

The right heart catheter assessment was performed to assess several prognostic hemodynamic variables in pulmonary hypertension, including right Pulmonary Arterial Pressure (PAP). Were assessed when the patient was in a stable hemodynamic rest state (as demonstrated by three consecutive Mean PAP and CO measurements within 10% of each other). PAP was assessed when the patient was breathing ambient air, every 2 minutes whilst breathing Nitric Oxide(NO) (1st and 2nd), 5 min after the end of NO administration, and 15 mins after the end of NO administration. (NCT00477269)
Timeframe: Baseline, and Study completion (Week 24)

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline breathing ambient air (n=27,28)Baseline every 2 mins breathing NO (1st) (n=20,20)Baseline every 2 mins breathing NO (2nd) (n=17,18)Baseline 5 mins after NO administration (n=20,14)Baseline 15 mins after NO administration(n=19,19)Week 24 breathing ambient air (n=20,22)Week 24 every 2 mins breathing NO (1st) (n=10,13)Week 24 every 2 mins breathing NO (2nd) (n=9,11)Week 24 5 mins after NO administration (n=10,12)Week 24 15 mins after NO administration (n=10,14)
Placebo59.255.753.356.956.555.555.153.957.557.2
STI57161.761.658.160.960.352.550.946.247.048.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline of Six Minute Walk Test - Number of Stops at Different Time Periods

The Six Minute Walk test was carried out along a course, such as a hospital corridor, measuring at least 20 meters delineated by markers. Patients were instructed to walk at a comfortable speed as far as they could manage in six minutes, resting whenever they needed to. Number of stops were recorded for each patient. (NCT00477269)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 32, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20 and Study completion (Week 24)

,
Interventionnumber of stops (Mean)
Day 32 (n=25,27)week 8 (n=23,24)week 12 (n=22,24)week 16 (n=19, 23)week 20 (n=19, 21)study completion Week 24 (n=21, 12)
Placebo0.10.00.30.00.3-0.1
STI571-0.2-0.2-0.3-0.3-0.4-0.3

[back to top]

Borg Score-Systolic Blood Pressure During the Six Minutes Walk Test at Different Time Periods

Six Minute Walk test was carried out along a course, such as a hospital corridor, measuring at least 20 meters delineated by markers. During the walk the patient was connected to a portable pulse oximeter via a finger probe. Patients were instructed to walk at a comfortable speed as far as they could manage in six minutes, resting whenever they needed to. Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) were recorded before the test at resting, at the end of the test and two minutes after the end of the test (NCT00477269)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 32, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20 and Study completion (Week 24)

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline: Resting (n= 26, 28)Baseline: End of Test (n= 21, 26)Baseline: 2 minutes after end of test (n=25, 27)Day 32: Resting (n= 25, 27)Day 32: End of Test (n= 22, 22)Day 32: 2 minutes after end of test (n= 25, 26)Week 8: Resting (n= 22, 24)Week 8: End of Test (n= 19, 20)Week 8: 2 minutes after end of test (n= 23, 24)Week 12: Resting (n= 22, 23)Week 12: End of Test (n= 17, 19)Week 12: 2 minutes after end of test (n= 20, 22)Week 16: Resting (n= 19, 22)Week 16: End of Test (n= 15,18)Week 16: 2 minutes after end of test (n= 19, 22)Week 20: Resting (n= 19, 20)Week 20: End of Test (n= 16,17)Week 20: 2 minutes after end of test (n= 19, 20)Week 24: Resting (n= 20, 21)Week 24: End of Test (n= 16, 17)Week 24: 2 minutes after end of test (n= 20, 19)
Placebo104.6118.3110.4106.0122.3113.8107.3119.9114.5107.7118.8115.9105.7119.8112.6109.1119.9115.1108.2116.8111.1
STI571111.3119.9120.0111.4126.5119.6108.9124.6115.2106.5122.2115.9106.7117.2114.6106.5122.4115.5110.6126.9118.2

[back to top]

Borg Score-Oxygen Saturation(SaO2) During the Six Minutes Walk Test at Different Time Periods

Six Minute Walk test was carried out along a course, such as a hospital corridor, measuring at least 20 meters delineated by markers. During the walk the patient was connected to a portable pulse oximeter via a finger probe. Patients were instructed to walk at a comfortable speed as far as they could manage in six minutes, resting whenever they needed to. The test was terminated if the patient became too distressed or if their SaO2% fell below 60%. (NCT00477269)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 32, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20 and Study completion (Week 24)

,
InterventionPercentage of Oxygen Saturation (Mean)
Baseline: Resting (n= 28, 29)Baseline: End of Test (n= 28, 28)Baseline: 2 minutes after end of test (n=26, 26)Day 32: Resting (n= 25, 28)Day 32: End of Test (n= 25, 28)Day 32: 2 minutes after end of test (n= 25, 26)Week 8: Resting (n= 23, 25)Week 8: End of Test (n= 23, 24)Week 8: 2 minutes after end of test (n= 23, 23)Week 12: Resting (n= 22, 25)Week 12: End of Test (n= 20, 24)Week 12: 2 minutes after end of test (n= 19, 22)Week 16: Resting (n= 19, 24)Week 16: End of Test (n= 18, 23)Week 16: 2 minutes after end of test (n= 19, 19)Week 20: Resting (n= 19, 22)Week 20: End of Test (n= 18, 21)Week 20: 2 minutes after end of test (n= 19, 21)Week 24: Resting (n= 20, 22)Week 24: End of Test (n= 20, 21)Week 24: 2 minutes after end of test (n= 20, 21)
Placebo93.487.992.092.487.292.793.287.993.193.989.694.294.188.193.393.787.693.494.389.394.8
STI57194.387.993.094.589.094.895.190.994.495.189.892.795.087.994.694.087.593.895.589.994.8

[back to top]

Borg Score-Heart Rate (HR) During the Six Minutes Walk Test at Different Time Periods

Six Minute Walk test was carried out along a course, such as a hospital corridor, measuring at least 20 meters delineated by markers. During the walk the patient was connected to a portable pulse oximeter via a finger probe. Patients were instructed to walk at a comfortable speed as far as they could manage in six minutes, resting whenever they needed to. Heart Rate (bpm) were recorded before the test at resting, at the end of the test and two minutes after the end of the test (NCT00477269)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 32, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20 and Study completion (Week 24)

,
Interventionbeats per minute (bpm) (Mean)
Baseline: Resting (n= 28, 29)Baseline: End of Test (n= 28, 29)Baseline: 2 minutes after end of test (n=26, 26)Day 32: Resting (n= 25, 28)Day 32: End of Test (n= 25, 28)Day 32: 2 minutes after end of test (n= 25, 26)Week 8: Resting (n= 23, 25)Week 8: End of Test (n= 23, 24)Week 8: 2 minutes after end of test (n= 23, 23)Week 12: Resting (n= 22, 25)Week 12: End of Test (n= 20, 25)Week 12: 2 minutes after end of test (n= 19, 22)Week 16: Resting (n= 19, 24)Week 16: End of Test (n= 18, 23)Week 16: 2 minutes after end of test (n= 19, 21)Week 20: Resting (n= 19, 22)Week 20: End of Test (n= 18,22)Week 20: 2 minutes after end of test (n= 19, 21)Week 24: Resting (n= 20, 22)Week 24: End of Test (n= 20, 21)Week 24: 2 minutes after end of test (n= 20, 21)
Placebo87.9112.394.183.6113.190.681.1110.388.985.1113.089.484.4117.985.580.2118.087.383.6116.888.9
STI57180.8106.384.280.7108.489.280.3109.585.376.5105.383.876.5102.885.875.3109.283.379.5110.287.9

[back to top]

Mean Cardiac Output (CO) at Baseline and Study Completion

The right heart catheter assessment was performed to assess several prognostic hemodynamic variables in pulmonary hypertension, including Cardiac Output (CO). Were assessed when the patient was in a stable hemodynamic rest state (as demonstrated by three consecutive Mean PAP and CO measurements within 10% of each other). PAP was assessed when the patient was breathing ambient air, every 2 minutes whilst breathing Nitric Oxide(NO) (1st and 2nd), 5 min after the end of NO administration, and 15 mins after the end of NO administration. (NCT00477269)
Timeframe: Baseline, and Study completion (Week 24)

,
InterventionL/min (Mean)
Baseline breathing ambient air (n=27,28)Baseline every 2 mins breathing NO (1st) (n=19,20)Baseline every 2 mins breathing NO (2nd) (n=17,18)Baseline 5 mins after NO administration (n=19,14)Baseline 15 mins after NO administration(n=18,19)Week 24 breathing ambient air (n=20,22)Week 24 every 2 mins breathing NO (1st) (n=10,13)Week 24 every 2 mins breathing NO (2nd) (n=9,11)Week 24 5 mins after NO administration (n=10,12)Week 24 15 mins after NO administration (n=10,14)
Placebo4.094.224.434.714.474.354.674.624.654.46
STI5714.204.023.984.203.874.904.804.794.634.48

[back to top]

Mean Heart Rate (HR) at Baseline and Study Completion

The right heart catheter assessment was performed to assess several prognostic hemodynamic variables in pulmonary hypertension, including Heart Rate (HR). Were assessed when the patient was in a stable hemodynamic rest state (as demonstrated by three consecutive Mean PAP and CO measurements within 10% of each other). PAP was assessed when the patient was breathing ambient air, every 2 minutes whilst breathing Nitric Oxide(NO) (1st and 2nd), 5 min after the end of NO administration, and 15 mins after the end of NO administration. (NCT00477269)
Timeframe: Baseline, and Study completion (Week 24)

,
Interventionbeats per minute (bpm) (Mean)
Baseline breathing ambient air (n=27,28)Baseline every 2 mins breathing NO (1st) (n=20,19)Baseline every 2 mins breathing NO (2nd) (n=17,17)Baseline 5 mins after NO administration (n=19,15)Baseline 15 mins after NO administration(n=18,19)Week 24 breathing ambient air (n=20,22)Week 24 every 2 mins breathing NO (1st) (n=9,13)Week 24 every 2 mins breathing NO (2nd) (n=8,11)Week 24 5 mins after NO administration (n=9,12)Week 24 15 mins after NO administration (n=10,14)
Placebo84.984.483.384.385.183.082.582.879.382.9
STI57177.375.975.273.276.276.676.376.675.773.2

[back to top]

Blood Gas Measurement - Venous Saturation at Baseline and Study Completion

The right heart catheter assessment was performed to assess Blood Gas Measurements in pulmonary hypertension, including Venous Saturation levels at baseline and Study completion Week 24. (NCT00477269)
Timeframe: Baseline, and Study completion (Week 24)

,
Interventionpercentage of saturation (Mean)
Baseline n=17,14Week 24 n=13,13
Placebo60.8457.00
STI57157.9665.11

[back to top]

Mean Pulmonary Artery Wedge Pressure (PAWP) at Baseline and Study Completion

The right heart catheter assessment was performed to assess several prognostic hemodynamic variables in pulmonary hypertension, including Pulmonary Arterial Wedge Pressure (PAWP). Were assessed when the patient was in a stable hemodynamic rest state (as demonstrated by three consecutive Mean PAP and CO measurements within 10% of each other). PAP was assessed when the patient was breathing ambient air, every 2 minutes whilst breathing Nitric Oxide(NO) (1st and 2nd), 5 min after the end of NO administration, and 15 mins after the end of NO administration. (NCT00477269)
Timeframe: Baseline, and Study completion (Week 24)

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline breathing ambient air (n=26,28)Baseline every 2 mins breathing NO (1st) (n=20,17)Baseline every 2 mins breathing NO (2nd) (n=17,16)Baseline 5 mins after NO administration (n=19,12)Baseline 15 mins after NO administration(n=18,17)Week 24 breathing ambient air (n=19,22)Week 24 every 2 mins breathing NO (1st) (n=9,13)Week 24 every 2 mins breathing NO (2nd) (n=9,11)Week 24 5 mins after NO administration (n=10,12)Week 24 15 mins after NO administration (n=10,14)
Placebo7.67.77.87.88.18.610.210.010.310.4
STI5719.09.59.49.59.68.47.97.07.16.7

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension (PAH) Assessd by World Health Organization (WHO) Classification on Physical Activity

PAH assessed according to the WHO classification: Class I Patients with PAH but without resulting limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue dyspnea or fatigue, chest pain or near syncope. Class II Patients with PAH resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity causes undue dyspnea or fatigue, chest pain or near syncope. Class III Patients with PAH resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes undue dyspnea or fatigue, chest pain or near syncope. Class IV Patients with PAH with inability to carry out any physical activity without symptoms. These patients manifest signs of right heart failure. Dyspnea and/or fatigue may even be present at rest. Discomfort is increased by any physical activity. (NCT00477269)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 32, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20 and Study completion

,
Interventionnumber of participants (Number)
Baseline: WHO Class IV (n=27,30)Baseline: WHO Class III (n=27,30)Baseline: WHO Class II (n=27,30)Day 32: WHO Class IV (n=27,30)Day 32: WHO Class III (n=27,30)Day 32: WHO Class II (n=27,30)Week 8: WHO Class IV (n=24,27)Week 8: WHO Class III (n=24,27)Week 8: WHO Class II (n=24,27)Week 12: WHO Class IV (n=23,27)Week 12: WHO Class III (n=23,27)Week 12: WHO Class II (n=23,27)Week 16: WHO Class IV (n=22,27)Week 16: WHO Class III (n=22,27)Week 16: WHO Class II (n=22,27)Week 16: WHO Class I (n=22,27)Week 20: WHO Class IV (n=19,24)Week 20: WHO Class III (n=19,24)Week 20: WHO Class II (n=19,24)Week 20: WHO Class I (n=19,24)Week 24: WHO Class IV (n=21,25)Week 24: WHO Class III (n=21,25)Week 24: WHO Class II (n=21,25)
Placebo1227321612061179118711149021310
STI5712141131113391201211011110010811128

[back to top]

Mean Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR) at Baseline and Study Completion

The right heart catheter assessment was performed to assess several prognostic hemodynamic variables in pulmonary hypertension, including Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR). Were assessed when the patient was in a stable hemodynamic rest state (as demonstrated by three consecutive Mean PAP and CO measurements within 10% of each other). PAP was assessed when the patient was breathing ambient air, every 2 minutes whilst breathing Nitric Oxide(NO) (1st and 2nd), 5 min after the end of NO administration, and 15 mins after the end of NO administration. PVR calculated according to the equation:PVR = (PAP - PCWP)/CO (NCT00477269)
Timeframe: Baseline, and Study completion (Week 24)

,
Interventiondyn*s/cm^5 (Mean)
Baseline breathing ambient air (n=27,27)Baseline every 2 mins breathing NO (1st) (n=19,17)Baseline every 2 mins breathing NO (2nd) (n=17,16)Baseline 5 mins after NO administration (n=19,11)Baseline 15 mins after NO administration(n=18,16)Week 24 breathing ambient air (n=19,21)Week 24 every 2 mins breathing NO (1st) (n=9,14)Week 24 every 2 mins breathing NO (2nd) (n=9,11)Week 24 5 mins after NO administration (n=10,12)Week 24 15 mins after NO administration (n=10,14)
Placebo1118.31067.9982.81160.41132.91017.01000.61033.6987.81042.5
STI5711124.41180.91064.61131.51181.9729.9706.9687.4717.2776.1

[back to top]

Borg Score-Diastolic Blood Pressure During the Six Minutes Walk Test at Different Time Periods

Six Minute Walk test was carried out along a course, such as a hospital corridor, measuring at least 20 meters delineated by markers. During the walk the patient was connected to a portable pulse oximeter via a finger probe. Patients were instructed to walk at a comfortable speed as far as they could manage in six minutes, resting whenever they needed to. Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) were recorded before the test at resting, at the end of the test and two minutes after the end of the test (NCT00477269)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 32, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20 and Study completion (Week 24)

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline: Resting (n= 26, 28)Baseline: End of Test (n= 21, 26)Baseline: 2 minutes after end of test (n=25, 27)Day 32: Resting (n= 25, 27)Day 32: End of Test (n= 22, 22)Day 32: 2 minutes after end of test (n= 25, 26)Week 8: Resting (n= 22, 24)Week 8: End of Test (n= 19, 20)Week 8: 2 minutes after end of test (n= 23, 24)Week 12: Resting (n= 22, 23)Week 12: End of Test (n= 17, 19)Week 12: 2 minutes after end of test (n= 20, 22)Week 16: Resting (n= 19, 22)Week 16: End of Test (n= 15,18)Week 16: 2 minutes after end of test (n= 19, 22)Week 20: Resting (n= 19, 20)Week 20: End of Test (n= 16,17)Week 20: 2 minutes after end of test (n= 19, 20)Week 24: Resting (n= 20, 21)Week 24: End of Test (n= 16, 17)Week 24: 2 minutes after end of test (n= 20, 19)
Placebo67.969.567.968.475.270.768.874.072.270.672.472.066.776.770.569.872.972.770.772.372.9
STI57168.275.171.669.678.272.567.774.871.265.575.673.167.772.771.467.272.971.969.774.171.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline of Six Minute Walk Test - Total Duration of Stops at Different Time Periods

The Six Minute Walk test was carried out along a course, such as a hospital corridor, measuring at least 20 meters delineated by markers. Patients were instructed to walk at a comfortable speed as far as they could manage in six minutes, resting whenever they needed to. If the patient stopped the duration of each stop was recorded. (NCT00477269)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 32, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20 and Study completion (Week 24)

,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
Day 32 (n=25,27)week 8 (n=23,24)week 12 (n=22,24)week 16 (n=19, 23)week 20 (n=19, 21)study completion Week 24 (n=21, 12)
Placebo0.120.070.190.060.120.03
STI571-0.06-0.03-0.03-0.03-0.05-0.02

[back to top]

Change From Baseline of Six Minute Walk Test - Total Distance Walked at Different Time Periods

The Six Minute Walk test was carried out along a course, such as a hospital corridor, measuring at least 20 meters delineated by markers. Patients were instructed to walk at a comfortable speed as far as they could manage in six minutes, resting whenever they needed to. Distance <500 meters suggests considerable exercise limitation; Distance 500-800 meters suggests moderate limitation; Distance >800 meters (with no rests) suggests mild or no limitation. (NCT00477269)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 32, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20 and Study completion (Week 24)

,
Interventionmeters (Mean)
Day 32 (n=25,27)week 8 (n=23,24)week 12 (n=22,24)week 16 (n=19, 23)week 20 (n=19, 21)study completion Week 24 (n=21, 12)
Placebo8.215.57.812.112.8-1.0
STI57110.217.02125.538.322.0

[back to top]

Mean Systemic Vascular Resistance (SVR) at Baseline and Study Completion

The right heart catheter assessment was performed to assess several prognostic hemodynamic variables in pulmonary hypertension, including Systemic Vascular Resistance (SVR). Were assessed when the patient was in a stable hemodynamic rest state (as demonstrated by three consecutive Mean PAP and CO measurements within 10% of each other). PAP was assessed when the patient was breathing ambient air, every 2 minutes whilst breathing Nitric Oxide(NO) (1st and 2nd), 5 min after the end of NO administration, and 15 mins after the end of NO administration. SVR was calculated according to the equation: SVR = (Paorta - Pright atrium)/CO (NCT00477269)
Timeframe: Baseline, and Study completion (Week 24)

,
Interventiondyn*s/cm^5 (Mean)
Baseline breathing ambient air (n=26,26)Baseline every 2 mins breathing NO (1st) (n=18,15)Baseline every 2 mins breathing NO (2nd) (n=16,14)Baseline 5 mins after NO administration (n=18,11)Baseline 15 mins after NO administration(n=17,15)Week 24 breathing ambient air (n=18,21)Week 24 every 2 mins breathing NO (1st) (n=9,13)Week 24 every 2 mins breathing NO (2nd) (n=9,11)Week 24 5 mins after NO administration (n=9,12)Week 24 15 mins after NO administration (n=10,14)
Placebo1764.81769.71664.71666.61748.41667.91579.31592.51503.91629.3
STI5711674.41778.21807.31609.21976.31427.21344.21367.91419.71431.7

[back to top]

Mean Systolic Arterial Pressure (SAP) at Baseline and Study Completion

The right heart catheter assessment was performed to assess several prognostic hemodynamic variables in pulmonary hypertension, including Systolic Arterial Pressure (SAP). Were assessed when the patient was in a stable hemodynamic rest state (as demonstrated by three consecutive Mean PAP and CO measurements within 10% of each other). PAP was assessed when the patient was breathing ambient air, every 2 minutes whilst breathing Nitric Oxide(NO) (1st and 2nd), 5 min after the end of NO administration, and 15 mins after the end of NO administration. (NCT00477269)
Timeframe: Baseline, and Study completion (Week 24)

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline breathing ambient air (n=26,28)Baseline every 2 mins breathing NO (1st) (n=20,19)Baseline every 2 mins breathing NO (2nd) (n=17,17)Baseline 5 mins after NO administration (n=21,15)Baseline 15 mins after NO administration(n=19,19)Week 24 breathing ambient air (n=20,22)Week 24 every 2 mins breathing NO (1st) (n=10,13)Week 24 every 2 mins breathing NO (2nd) (n=9,11)Week 24 5 mins after NO administration (n=9,12)Week 24 15 mins after NO administration (n=10,14)
Placebo108.2106.9105.4107.1106.9106.9102.9103.6104.0107.3
STI571110.3108.3109.9106.0109.5108.0103.9104.8103.4103.8

[back to top]

Borg Score During the Six Minutes Walk Test at Different Time Periods

Borg Score during Six Minute Walk test was carried out along a course, such as a hospital corridor, measuring at least 20 meters delineated by markers. During the walk the patient was connected to a portable pulse oximeter via a finger probe. Patients were instructed to walk at a comfortable speed as far as they could manage in six minutes, resting whenever they needed to. Borg Score of Breathlessness was recorded using the following score of 0 to 10, how breathless do you feel? 0 is nothing at all and 10 is maximal breathlessness (NCT00477269)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 32, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20 and Study completion (Week 24)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline: Resting (n= 26, 27)Baseline: End of Test (n= 27, 29)Baseline: 2 minutes after end of test (n=24, 26)Day 32: Resting (n= 25, 27)Day 32: End of Test (n= 25, 28)Day 32: 2 minutes after end of test (n= 25, 26)Week 8: Resting (n= 23, 24)Week 8: End of Test (n= 23, 25)Week 8: 2 minutes after end of test (n= 23, 24)Week 12: Resting (n= 22, 24)Week 12: End of Test (n= 22, 25)Week 12: 2 minutes after end of test (n= 22, 23)Week 16: Resting (n= 19, 23)Week 16: End of Test (n= 18, 23)Week 16: 2 minutes after end of test (n= 19, 23)Week 20: Resting (n= 19, 21)Week 20: End of Test (n= 18,22)Week 20: 2 minutes after end of test (n= 18, 20)Week 24: Resting (n= 20, 21)Week 24: End of Test (n= 20, 21)Week 24: 2 minutes after end of test (n= 20, 20)
Placebo0.433.021.080.483.071.060.382.320.580.462.920.650.502.830.700.673.110.750.402.930.67
STI5710.273.340.880.242.530.650.322.460.320.052.270.350.132.500.410.052.310.310.182.580.29

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Remaining in Confirmed Complete Cytogenetic Response (cCCyR)

"Cytogenetic response (CyR) is based on the prevalence of Philadelphia positive (Ph+) cells in metaphase from bone marrow (BM) sample. (Ideally, 25 metaphases but at least 20 metaphases from a BM sample were evaluated). Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR)=0% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM. A cCCyR=those in which all measurements up to at least 28 days after the initial response show an equivalent or better CCyR.~Percentage of participants in cCCyR at years 2, 3, 4 and 5 was computed for all randomized participants who achieved cCCyR as measured from the time of first confirmation until the date of progression or death. Participants with cCCyR who neither progress nor die are censored on the date of their last cytogenetic assessment. Participants without cCCyR are considered to have progressed on Day 1." (NCT00481247)
Timeframe: Years 2, 3, 4 and 5

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
At Year 2At Year 3At Year 4At Year 5
Dasatinib98.096.995.693.1
Imatinib96.995.795.791.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Abnormalities in On-study Laboratory Test Results

ULN=upper limit of normal. Grade 3=Severe AE; Grade 4=Life-threatening or disabling AE. Absolute neutrophil count: Grade 3 <1000-500/mm^3; Grade 4 <500/mm^3. Hemoglobin: Grade 3 <8.0-6.5 g/dL; Grade 4 <6.5 g/dL. Platelets: Grade 3 <50,000-25,000/mm^3; Grade 4 <25,000/mm^3. ALT/AST: Grade 3 >5.0-20*ULN; Grade 4 >20*ULN. Total bilirubin: Grade 3 >3-10*ULN; Grade 4 >10*ULN. Sample normal ranges (may vary by institution): ALT, Female: 7-30 U/L, Male: 10-55 U/L; AST, Female: 9-25 U/L, Male10-40 U/L; Total bilirubin: 0.0-1.0 mg/dL. Creatinine: Grade 3 >3.0-6.0*ULN; Grade 4 >6.0*ULN. Phosphate: Grade 3 <2.0-1.0 mg/dL; Grade 4 <1.0 mg/dL. Calcium: Grade 3 <7.0-6.0 mg/dL; Grade 4 <6.0 mg/dL. Potassium: Grade 3 <3.0-2.5 mmol/L; Grade 4 <2.5 mmol/L. (NCT00481247)
Timeframe: From date of last person, first visit to date of last person, last visit (approximately 8 years)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Grade 3/4 Absolute neutrophil countGrade 3/4 HemoglobinGrade 3/4 PlateletsGrade 3/4 Alanine aminotransferase (ALT)Grade 3/4 Aspartate aminotransferase (AST)Grade 3/4 Total bilirubinGrade 3/4 CreatinineGrade 3/4 PhosphateGrade 3/4 CalciumGrade 3/4 Potassium
Dasatinib74355622331990
Imatinib61233743027978

[back to top] [back to top]

Time to Confirmed Complete Cytogenic Response (cCCyR) Overall

"The time to cCCyR for all randomized participants is defined as the time from the randomization date until criteria are first met for complete cytogenic response (provided it is confirmed later). The time to cCCyR analysis censors nonresponders who do not progress at their last cytogenetic assessments and nonresponders who progress at the maximum time of all randomized participants.~." (NCT00481247)
Timeframe: Day 1 to 5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Dasatinib3.1
Imatinib5.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from randomization until progression (any progression/death within 30 days of last dosing date, or between 30-60 days of last dosing prior to start of secondary therapy). Those who did not progress/die or who progressed/died after 60 days of last dose were censored at last on-study hematologic/cytogenetic assessment; those with progression/death 30-60 days of last dosing date and after start date of secondary therapy censored at last on-study hematologic/cytogenetic assessment prior to start of secondary therapy; those who had not received study treatment censored on date randomized. (NCT00481247)
Timeframe: Participants were followed-up for at least 5 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Dasatinib88.9
Imatinib89.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death. If the participant had not died, survival was censored on last date the participant was known to be alive. (NCT00481247)
Timeframe: Participants were followed-up for at least 5 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Dasatinib90.9
Imatinib89.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) at Any Time

Molecular response was assessed using BCR-ABL transcript levels measured by realtime quantitative polymerase chain reaction. MMR is defined as a ratio BCR-ABL/ABL ≤0.1% on the international scale (ie, at least 3 log reduction from a standardized baseline value). (NCT00481247)
Timeframe: Planned total follow-up duration of 5 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Dasatinib76.4
Imatinib64.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Best Confirmed Complete Cytogenetic Response (cCCyR) Within 12 Months

Cytogenetic response (CyR) is based on the prevalence of Philadelphia positive (Ph+) cells in metaphase from bone marrow (BM) sample. (Ideally, 25 metaphases but at least 20 metaphases from a BM sample were evaluated). Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR)=0% Ph+ cells in metaphase in BM. A cCCyR=those in which all measurements up to at least 28 days after the initial response show an equivalent or better CCyR. (NCT00481247)
Timeframe: Pretreatment, every 3 months up to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Dasatinib204
Imatinib177

[back to top]

Time to Major Molecular Response (MMR) Overall

The time to MMR for all randomized participants is defined as the time from randomization date until measurement criteria are first met for MMR. The time to MMR analysis censors nonresponders who do not progress at their last molecular assessments and nonresponders who progress at the maximum time of all randomized participants. (NCT00481247)
Timeframe: Day 1 to 5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Dasatinib9.3
Imatinib15.0

[back to top]

Participant Response Rate

Response rate to regimen defined as the number of complete or partial response divided by the total number of participants treated. Tumor response defined by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST). All complete and partial responses confirmed by a second assessment six weeks later. (NCT00485485)
Timeframe: At 6 weeks reconfirmed 6 weeks later

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Imatinib Mesylate + Docetaxel7

[back to top]

Participants' With mCR Response to Post Transplant Imatinib Mesylate Therapy

Number of participants with response of molecular complete remission (mCR) to Imatinib Mesylate therapy as treatment for residual disease after transplant. Molecular remission is a complete remission with no evidence of disease in the blood cells and/or bone marrow using sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests. (NCT00499889)
Timeframe: 1 Year

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Mesylate, Busulfan, Fludarabine + Antithymocyte Globulin10

[back to top]

Participants' With mCR Response to Post Transplant DLI

Number of participants with response of molecular complete remission (mCR) to DLI as treatment for residual disease after transplant. Molecular remission is a complete remission with no evidence of disease in the blood cells and/or bone marrow using sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests. (NCT00499889)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Mesylate, Busulfan, Fludarabine + Antithymocyte Globulin4

[back to top]

Number of Participants in Complete Molecular Remission at 1 Year

Participants at 1 year in molecular remission, post transplant, post imatinib mesylate and donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI). Molecular remission is a complete remission with no evidence of disease in the blood cells and/or bone marrow using sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests (this test is most commonly used in clinical trials). (NCT00499889)
Timeframe: Baseline to 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Mesylate, Busulfan, Fludarabine + Antithymocyte Globulin21

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Pathological Complete Response

Probability of response, defined as pathological complete remission based on tissue obtained at surgery. Pathological Complete Response (pCR): Patients without gross or microscopic evidence of residual disease at Radical Prostatectomy defined as pCR. (NCT00500110)
Timeframe: Every 3 months for 1 year, then every 6 months until disease progression or death

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Complete Response

Complete Response (CR): Disappearance lesions, no evidence new lesions documented by 2 disease assessments> 4 weeks apart. Partial Response (PR):>30% decrease in sum longest dimensions (LD) all target measurable lesions reference baseline sum of LD; No progression non-target lesions & no new lesions; Documentation by 2 disease assessments >4 weeks apart; Progressive Disease (PD) (ANY of following): >20% increase in sum LD of target lesions reference smallest sum LD or appearance of new lesions within 8 weeks of study entry; Unequivocal progression on existing non-target lesions, other than pleural effusions without cytological proof of neoplastic origin, within 8 weeks of study entry also considered increasing disease. Death due to disease without prior objective documentation of progression; Global deterioration in health attributable to disease requiring change in therapy without objective evidence of progression. Stable disease: Any condition not meeting above criteria. (NCT00506779)
Timeframe: 6 weeks to 18 weeks; Best response achieved since study entry where measurable disease defined as => 1 lesion accurately measured in at least 1 dimension (longest dimension to be recorded)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants With Measurable Disease1
Participants With Non-Measurable Disease7

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

"Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Oral Imatinib Mesylate in Combination with Fixed Dose Paclitaxel where MTD of Imatinib Mesylate (mg/m^2 daily) to be determined with conventional 3+3 design, MTD is highest dose level in which 6 participants treated with at most 2 experiencing dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Study utilizes Common Terminology for Adverse Events Criteria (CTCAE) version 3.0 for adverse event reporting.~Following cohorts of 3 at lower dose levels until 1 of 3 patients experiences DLT; if 1 of 3 patients experiences DLT at dose level, enter 3 additional patients at dose level, if only 1 of 6 patients experiences DLT at dose level, proceed to next higher dose level with cohort of 3; If 2 of 3 or 3 of 6 patients experience DLT, MTD has exceeded. Once DLT exceeded, treat another 3 patients at previous dose if there were only 3 patients treated at that dose level. MTD is highest dose level in which treated 6 patients with at most 2 experiencing the DLT." (NCT00506779)
Timeframe: Evaluated at 3 weeks (one cycle)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Imatinib Mesylate 400 mg0
Imatinib Mesylate 500 mg1
Imatinib Mesylate 600 mg2

[back to top]

Cell Types That Contribute to the Gene Expression Changes Associated With Imatinib Therapy

To determine which cell types may be contributing to the gene expression changes associated with imatinib therapy, imatinib-responsive genes were isolated from from patient biopsies. From the total number of imatinib-responsive genes that were isolated, the percentage that came from endothelial cells, fibroblasts, B-cells, and multiple cell types was calculated. Reported values do not total to 100% because of rounding. (NCT00506831)
Timeframe: 6 months compared to baseline

Interventionpercentage of isolated genes (Number)
Endothelial cellsFibroblastsB-cellsMultiple cell types
Imatinib Mesylate1326852

[back to top]

Percent Change in Modified Rodnan Skin Score at 6 Months Compared to Baseline

Modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) on scale of 0 (no skin disease) to 51 severe skin disease. %change in mRSS=(score at 6 months - baseline score)/baseline score. Negative values indicate improvement in skin disease. Clinical important improvement defined as > 25% improvement. (NCT00506831)
Timeframe: 6 months compared to baseline

Interventionpercentage of change in MRSS (Mean)
Imatinib Mesylate-32

[back to top]

Change in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire at 6 Months Compared to Baseline

Change in Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index at 6 months compared to baseline. The Questionnaire is comprised of a 20 question instrument pertaining to specific activities with possible integer responses of 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do), and five additional scleroderma-specific visual analog scale (VAS) domains with possible values ranging from 0.0 to 15.0. The 20 questions are divided into eight domains. A mean score is calculated for each domain ranging from 0 to 3. A composite score is calculated by dividing the summed domain scores by the number of domains answered. The composite score is reported, falling between 0 and 3 on an ordinal scale. The scores are interpreted as 0 (no impairment in function) to 3 (maximal impairment of function). (NCT00506831)
Timeframe: 6 months compared to baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Imatinib Mesylate-.35

[back to top]

Change in Pulmonary Function Tests at 6 Months Compared to Baseline

Change in % predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at 6 months compared to baseline. FVC is the volume of air that can forcibly be blown out after taking a full breath. FVC% predicted is defined as FVC% of the patient divided by the average FVC% in the population for any person of similar age, sex and body composition. (NCT00506831)
Timeframe: 6 months compared to baseline

InterventionFVC% predicted (Mean)
Imatinib Mesylate0

[back to top]

Change in Dermal Thickness and Collagen Separation on Cutaneous Histopathology at 6 Months Compared to Baseline

(NCT00506831)
Timeframe: 6 months compared to baseline

Interventionmm (Number)
Imatinib Mesylate-.5

[back to top]

Median Progression-free Survival (PFS) for Patients Less Than 60 Years of Age

"PFS measured from the date of Complete Response (CR) to the date of relapse or death. Progression defined as any of the following event: progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis, death, loss of CHR or MCyR, or in patients not achieving a CHR an increasing WBC despite appropriate therapeutic management~This outcome will be reported as median progression-free survival in months for participants less than 60 years of age." (NCT00509093)
Timeframe: up to 5 years from the End of Treatment

Interventionmonths (Median)
Imatinib Mesylate52.1

[back to top]

Toxicity as Measured by NCI CTC v. 3.0

"Number of patients (%) experiencing an adverse event~See adverse events section for details" (NCT00509093)
Timeframe: 13 months from start of treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Imatinib Mesylate30

[back to top]

Percent of Participants Less Than 60 Years of Age With PFS at 8 and 13 Months Post-treatment

Percent of participants less than 60 years of age with PFS at 8 and 13 months post-treatment (NCT00509093)
Timeframe: at 8 and 13 months after treatment.

Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
at 8 months post treatmentat 13 months post treatment
Imatinib Mesylate76.254.5

[back to top]

Percent of Participants 60 Years of Age or Older With PFS at 8 and 13 Months Post-treatment

Percent of participants 60 years of age or older with PFS at 8 and 13 months post-treatment (NCT00509093)
Timeframe: at 8 and 13 months after treatment.

Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
at 8 months post treatmentat 13 months post treatment
Imatinib Mesylate61.936.4

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival for Patients 60 Years of Age and Older

Progression free survival will be measured from the date of Complete Response (CR) to the date of relapse or death. (NCT00509093)
Timeframe: up to 5 years from the End of Treatment

Interventionmonths (Median)
Imatinib Mesylate10.7

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR = participant proportion with responsive disease: Complete Response (CR): disappearance all clinically detectable malignant disease for at least 4 weeks, no new lesions; Partial Response (PR): >/= 50% decrease sum of products of perpendicular diameters of all measurable lesions for at least 4 weeks; Stable Disease: does not qualify for CR, PR or progression. Progressive Disease: a 25% or > increase in sum of products of measurable lesions over smallest sum observed, OR reappearance of lesion which had disappeared, OR appearance of new lesion/site. Response determined every 6 week cycle. (NCT00510653)
Timeframe: 6 weeks with re-evaluation every 6 weeks or until disease progression

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete ResponsePartial Response
Imatinib Mesylate00

[back to top]

Change in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (MRSS)

No measures of dispersion was available as data were lost. The range of this measure is 0 to 51 and measures the extent of skin thickening with higher numbers representing thickening. (NCT00512902)
Timeframe: Baseline vs. Endpoint

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Imatinib3.9

[back to top]

Change in FVC (Forced Vital Capacity)

Measures the amount of air breathed out as a percent of predicted. (NCT00512902)
Timeframe: Baseline vs. Endpoint (1 year)

InterventionPercent predicted (Mean)
Imatinib1.74

[back to top] [back to top]

Change in DLco

DLCO (diffusing capacity or transfer factor of the lung for carbon monoxide (CO)) is the extent to which oxygen passes from the air sacs of the lungs into the blood. Commonly, it refers to the test used to determine this parameter. (NCT00512902)
Timeframe: Baseline vs. Endpoint (1 year)

InterventionPercent predicted (Mean)
Imatinib1.46

[back to top]

Change in TLC (Total Lung Capacity)

No measures of dispersion was available for TLC as data were lost. This describes the total lung capacity as a percent of predicted. (NCT00512902)
Timeframe: Baseline vs. Endpoint (1 year)

InterventionPercent predicted (Mean)
Imatinib4.17

[back to top]

Improvement in Indices of Pulmonary Function Measured by Change DLCO hb Adj % Predicted

This outcome measure includes patients with and without the presence of Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD). Diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) measures how much oxygen travels from the alveoli of the lungs to the blood stream. DLCO is adjusted for hemoglobin as small changes in hemoglobin concentration can affect the carbon monoxide transfer. DLCO results are compared to normal values for a patient's height, age, sex, and ethnicity. A DLCO result that is at least 80% of the predicted value is considered normal. Improvement in DLCO hb adj % predicted is measured by Mean change (and 95% Confidence Interval) from Baseline mean to Month 12 mean (the average change in DLCO hb adj% from baseline to month 12). (NCT00555581)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionDLCO% (Mean)
400 mg Daily of Imatinib Mesylate5.5

[back to top]

Improvement in Indices of Pulmonary Function Measured by Change in FVC % Predicted

This outcome measure includes patients with and without the presence of Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD). Forced vital capacity (FVC) is the amount of air that can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking a deep breath. It is used to determine the severity of lung disease. Improvement in FVC % predicted is measured by Mean change (and 95% Confidence Interval) from Baseline mean to Month 12 mean. Results are compared to the predicted values that are calculated from a patients age, size, weight, and sex. Results are considered normal if FVC is 80 percent or more of the predicted value. Mean change in FVC % predicted is measured by the average change in FVC% percent predicted from baseline to month 12. (NCT00555581)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionFVC% (Mean)
400 mg Daily of Imatinib Mesylate6.4

[back to top]

Improvement in the Modified Rodnan Skin Score

Improvement in the Modified Rodnan Skin Score (MRSS) is measured by Mean change (and 95% Confidence Interval) from Baseline mean to Month 12 mean.Measure Description: The Modified Rodnan Skin Score (MRSS) measures dermal skin thickness through the examination of 17 body areas: fingers, hands, forearms, arms, feet, legs, and thighs (in pairs), and face, chest, and abdomen. The skin score is 0 for uninvolved skin through 3 for severe thickening (hidebound skin). The total skin score is the sum of the skin scores of the individual areas. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 51. A higher score indicates greater severity of disease. The mean change in MRSS represents the average change in total skin score from baseline to month 12. (NCT00555581)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
400 mg Daily of Imatinib Mesylate-6.6

[back to top]

Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index

"The Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) consist of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and 8 other domains which include scales looking at pain, patient global assessment, vascular, digital ulcers, lung involvement, and gastrointestinal involvement. It addresses scleroderma related manifestations that contribute to disability. It is a quality of life measure. Each question is scored from 0 (without difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). Some domains in the SHAQ are visual analog scales that are measured first and then changed to a 0-3 scale.~The maximum from each category is added together and divided by the number of categories completed. Change in Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (SHAQ-DI) is measured as Mean Change (and 95% Confidence Interval) from Baseline mean to Month 12 mean (the average change in SHAQ-DI from baseline to month 12)." (NCT00555581)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
400 mg Daily of Imatinib Mesylate0.02

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Month 12 in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Questionnaire:Mental Component Summary

The Short Form 36 (SF-36) is a validated 36 item questionnaire which measures quality of life across eight domains: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, role limitations due to emotional problems, energy/fatigue, emotional well-being, social functioning, pain, general health. The mental component score is composed of a subset of the 8 health domains. Each component is directly transformed into a 0 to 100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. A score of 0 is equal to maximum disability, and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.The SF-36 mental component can be obtained by looking at the mean average of all the emotionally relevant items. Change in Short Form 36 mental (SF-36 MC) is measured by Mean change (and 95 % Confidence Interval) from Baseline mean to Month 12 mean (the average change in SF-36 mental component from baseline to month 12). (NCT00555581)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
400 mg Daily of Imatinib Mesylate-6.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Month 12 in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Questionnaire: Physical Component Summary

The Short Form 36 (SF-36) is a 36 item questionnaire which measures quality of life across eight domains: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, role limitations due to emotional problems, energy/fatigue, emotional well-being, social functioning, pain, general health. The physical component score is composed of a subset of the 8 health domains.The SF-36 physical component can be obtained by looking at the mean average of all the physically relevant items. Each component is directly transformed into a 0 to 100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. A score of 0 is equal to maximum disability, and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability. Change in Short Form 36 physical component (SF-36 PC) is measured by Mean change (and 95 % Confidence Interval) from Baseline mean to Month 12 mean (the average change in SF-36 physical component from baseline to month 12). (NCT00555581)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
400 mg Daily of Imatinib Mesylate6.8

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of On-Treatment Transformation to Accelerated Phase (AP) or Blast Phase (BP) at 192 Weeks

"The cumulative incidence curve was generated based on the time from randomization to the first date of transformation to AP or BP while on study treatment adjusting for the competing risk of treatment discontinuation without transformation, for each participant.~Criteria for transformation to AP: 15 to 29% blasts; ≥30% blasts + promyelocytes; ≥20% basophils in blood or bone marrow; platelets <100*10^9/L (not related to therapy), in blood. Criteria for transformation to BP: ≥30% blasts in blood or bone marrow and extramedullary involvement other than liver or spleen (example: chloromas).~Time to transformation was calculated as weeks = ([date of first documented occurrence of the event - date of randomization] + 1)/7. If transformation was not obtained, censoring was at the last hematologic assessment or death (whichever was earliest). Participants who were not treated contributed time = 1 day/7. 95% confidence interval for the cumulative incidence is from Gray's method." (NCT00574873)
Timeframe: 192 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Bosutinib1.6
Imatinib4.4

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Retaining Complete Hematologic Response (CHR) at 192 Weeks

"The Kaplan-Meier curve was generated based on the first date of confirmed CHR until the first date of loss of CHR, objectively documented, for responders only. Participants without confirmed loss of response were censored at the last valid hematologic assessment.~CHR must have been of at least 4 weeks in duration confirmed by 2 assessments at least 4 weeks apart and was defined as follows: white blood cells ≤ institutional upper limit of normal, no peripheral blasts or promyelocytes, myelocytes + metamyelocytes <5% in blood, absolute neutrophil count ≥1.0*10^9/L, platelets ≥100 but <450*10^9/L unless related to therapy, <20% basophils in blood and no extramedually involvement (including hepato- or splenomegaly).~The medians have not been reached in either arm, as such, the premature estimated hazard ratio is provided. Four years rate was displayed since the majority of participants had first CHR by Year 1." (NCT00574873)
Timeframe: 192 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Bosutinib91.6
Imatinib86.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) at Year 1

Molecular response was assessed using Bcr-Abl transcript levels measured by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) from peripheral blood. A MMR was defined as a ratio Bcr-Abl/Abl less than or equal to (≤) 0.1% on the international scale (greater than or equal to [≥] 3 log reduction from standardized baseline in ratio of Bcr-Abl to Abl transcripts) with at least 3000 Abl analyzed. (NCT00574873)
Timeframe: Year 1 (48 weeks)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Bosutinib38.0
Imatinib25.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) at Year 1

Cytogenetic Response (CyR) is based on the prevalence of Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) metaphases among cells in metaphase on a bone marrow (BM) aspirate. CCyR was achieved when there was 0 percent (%) Ph+ metaphases among cells in a BM sample when at least 20 metaphases from a BM sample were analyzed, or less than (<) 1% breakpoint cluster region Abelson protooncogene (Bcr-Abl) fusion product among cells in a BM sample or peripheral blood sample when at least 200 cells were analyzed. (NCT00574873)
Timeframe: Year 1 (48 weeks)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Bosutinib70.0
Imatinib68.3

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Retaining Derived MMR at 144 Weeks

"The Kaplan-Meier curve was generated based on the first date of MMR until the first date loss of MMR, objectively documented, for responders only. Participants without confirmed loss of response were censored at the last valid molecular assessment.~Molecular response was assessed using Bcr-Abl transcript levels measured by RT-PCR from peripheral blood. MMR is defined as a ratio Bcr-Abl/Abl ≤0.1% on the international scale (≥3 log reduction from standardized baseline in ratio of Bcr-Abl to Abl transcripts) with at least 3000 Abl analyzed.~The medians have not been reached in either arm, as such, the premature estimated hazard ratio is provided. Three years rate was displayed since the majority of imatinib participants had first MMR by Year 2." (NCT00574873)
Timeframe: 144 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Bosutinib94.7
Imatinib98.0

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Retaining CCyR at 192 Weeks

"The Kaplan-Meier curve was generated based the time from the first date of CCyR until the first date of confirmed loss of CCyR, objectively documented, for responders only. Participants without confirmed loss of CCyR were censored at the last valid cytogenetic assessment.~CyR is based on the prevalence of Ph+ metaphases among cells in metaphase on a bone marrow sample. CCyR was achieved when there was 0% Ph+ metaphases among cells in a BM sample when at least 20 metaphases from a BM sample were analyzed, or <1% Bcr-Abl fusion product among cells in a BM sample or peripheral blood sample when at least 200 cells were analyzed.~The medians have not been reached in either arm, as such, the premature estimated hazard ratio is provided. Four years rate was displayed since the majority of participants had first CCyR by Year 1." (NCT00574873)
Timeframe: 192 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Bosutinib92.9
Imatinib88.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Non-response, Partial Response, Complete Response, and Remission Assessed by MRSS Values

The following MRSS categories were calculated for up to Week 48: Non-response: a reduction in MRSS <25%, Partial response: a reduction in MRSS between 25-<50%, Complete response: a reduction in MRSS between 50-<80%, Remission: a reduction in MRSS ≥80%. (NCT00613171)
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, and Week 48/End of Study (EOS)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Week 272373437Week 472373437Week 672373437Week 872373437Week 1272373437Week 1672373437Week 2072373437Week 2472373437Week 2872373437Week 3272373437Week 3672373437Week 4072373437Week 4472373437Week 48/EOS72373437
Non-responseComplete ResponseRemissionPartial Response
STI57127
STI5710
STI57125
STI57124
STI5712
STI5711
STI57122
STI57115
STI57116
STI57113
STI5719
STI5713
STI5715
STI5718

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (MRSS) at Each Time Point of Analysis

The efficacy of oral STI571 in participants with systemic sclerosis is defined by an improvement in MRSS. Skin thickness was assessed clinically in each of 17 body areas and scored using a 0-3 scale, where 0= normal, 1= mild thickness, 2= moderate thickness, and 3= severe thickness (maximum score 51). A higher score indicates greater severity of the disease. (NCT00613171)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, and Week 48/End of Study (EOS)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 2Week 4Week 6Week 8Week 12Week 16Week 20Week 24Week 28Week 32Week 36Week 40Week 44Week 48/ EOS
STI57125.76.585.978.348.483.3412.7012.419.90-3.17-5.67-12.61-5.23-13.57-20.89

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE's) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE's)

An AE is the appearance or worsening of any undesirable sign, symptom, or medical condition occurring after starting the study drug even if the event is not considered to be related to the study drug. An SAE is defined as an event that is fatal or life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, constitutes a congenital anomaly/birth defect, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is medically significant, i.e., defined as an event that jeopardizes the patient or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. (NCT00613171)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 48/EOS

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants Experiencing AE'sParticipants Experiencing SAE's
STI571275

[back to top]

12-month Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Percentage of participants surviving twelve months from the start of cycle 1 without progression of disease. PFS was defined as the time from the cycle 1 start date to the date of the first documented progression according to modified Macdonald criteria, or to death due to any cause. (NCT00615927)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Astrocytoma43.8
Oligodendroglioma34.4

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival (OS)

Time in weeks from the start of cycle 1 to date of death due to any cause. Patients alive at last follow-up are censored as of that follow-up date. Median OS was estimated using a Kaplan-Meier curve. (NCT00615927)
Timeframe: Time in weeks from the start of cycle 1 to date of death due to any cause, assessed up to 156 weeks

Interventionweeks (Median)
AstrocytomaNA
OligodendrogliomaNA

[back to top]

Median Progression-free Survival

Time in weeks from the start of cycle 1 to the date of first progression according to modified Macdonald criteria, or to death due to any cause. Patients alive who had not progressed as of the last follow-up had PFS censored at the last follow-up date. Median PFS was estimated using a Kaplan-Meier curve. (NCT00615927)
Timeframe: Time in weeks from the start of cycle 1 to the date of first progression according to modified Macdonald criteria or to death due to any cause, assessed up to 156 weeks

Interventionweeks (Median)
Astrocytoma43.5
Oligodendroglioma43.3

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

Number of participants with an objective response (complete response or partial response) based on modified Macdonald criteria. (NCT00615927)
Timeframe: 156 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Astrocytoma0
Oligodendroglioma0

[back to top]

Safety and Tolerability of Gleevec + Hydroxyurea in Patients With Low-grade Gliomas

The number of patients experiencing any serious adverse event or other (non-serious) adverse event during the study participation. (NCT00615927)
Timeframe: 156 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Experienced any Serious Adverse EventExperienced any (non-serious) Adverse Event
Astrocytoma1028
Oligodendroglioma328

[back to top]

Safety - Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events

Number of reported grade 3 or 4 adverse events (NCT00667953)
Timeframe: through study completion, an average of 1 year

InterventionAdverse Events (Number)
Arm A:20

[back to top]

Response

Response rate by RECIST (NCT00667953)
Timeframe: through study completion, an average of 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A:1

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in the Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) to Assess Skin Tethering

The modified Rodnan Skin Score is the accepted clinical measure of scleroderma skin activity. The investigator assessed the thickening of the skin using the modified Rodnan Skin Score through simple palpation on 17 different skin sites in the fingers, hands, forearms, arms, feet, legs, and thighs (bilaterally) and face, chest, and abdomen (singly). Skin thickness was assessed on a scale of 0 to 3; 0 representing normal skin and 3 being severe thickening. The sum of the individual scores can range from 0 (normal) to 51 (severe thickening in all 17 areas). Percentage change is calculated as the Month 4 Score - Baseline Score/Baseline Score * 100. A negative percentage change indicates improvement. (NCT00677092)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 4

Interventionpercentage change in mRSS score (Mean)
Imatinib Mesylate Treatment-24

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival

"Progression-free survival based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the duration of time from study entry to documented disease progression (PD) requiring removal from the study or death. Disease progression was assessed per International Workshop Criteria (IWC) [Cheson, et al. JCO 2007].~Per International Working Group response criteria in lymphoma progressive disease (PD) was defined as the appearance of new lesions; the sum of the product of the diameter (SPD) increasing ≥50% from nadir (smallest value seen during trial) in nodal target lesions overall; or, in any single nodal target lesion, a node with a short axis > 10 mm must increase > 50% in greatest transverse diameter or a node with short axis <10mm must increase by at least 50% to at least 15 mm x 15 mm or have a greatest transverse diameter greater than 15 mm." (NCT00684411)
Timeframe: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline, on treatment at weeks 8, 16, 24 and every 12 weeks thereafter, off treatment for 6 weeks or until death, whichever occurs first. Treatment duration was a median of 56 days (range 5-253 days).

Interventiondays (Median)
Imatinib Mesylate21

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from study entry to death or date last known alive. (NCT00684411)
Timeframe: Participants were followed long-term for survival for the earlier of 6 weeks from the end of treatment or death. Maximum follow-up was 288 days in this study cohort.

Interventiondays (Median)
Imatinib Mesylate154

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

"Overall response rate is defined as the proportion of patients who achieve complete remission (CR), complete remission/unconfirmed (CRu) or partial remission (PR) based on International Workshop Criteria (IWC) [Cheson, et al. JCO 2007].~Per the International Working Group response criteria in lymphoma (Cheson 2007) for target lesions assessed by CT: Complete response (CR): nodes that were greater than 15 mm in greatest transverse diameter at baseline shrank to less than 15 mm in greatest transverse diameter and those that were 11-15 mm in greatest transverse diameter but had a short axis diameter greater than 10 mm had a short axis diameter less than 10mm and a transverse diameter that remained less than 15 mm; partial response (PR) was defined as a decrease in the sum of the product of the diameter of target lesions by more than 50% but not fulfilling criteria for CR. Overall response was defined as CR+PR.~." (NCT00684411)
Timeframe: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline, weeks 8, 16, 24 and every 12 weeks thereafter on treatment. Treatment duration was a median of 56 days (range 5-253 days).

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Imatinib Mesylate0.0

[back to top]

The Proportion of Patients at 1 Year With Treatment Efficacy Success

To be considered a treatment efficacy success at 1 year posttransplant, the patient's bone marrow must demonstrate complete hematological remission, absence of Philadelphia chromosomes, and not satisfy any of the criteria for treatment failure (>/= 1% aberrantly expressing marrow blasts by multiparameter flow cytometry, >5% BCR/ABL in marrow by fluorescent in situ hybridization, or >1 log rise in peripheral blood BCR/ABL by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) since day 80). (NCT00702403)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
By intention to treatExcluding early non-relapse deaths
Treatment (Prophylactic Inhibition of BCR-ABL Tyrosine Kinase)2929

[back to top]

Survival

The proportion of study participants alive at 1, 2 and 3 years (NCT00702403)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Overall Survival at 1 yearOveral Survival at 2 yearsOverall Survival at 3 years
Treatment (Prophylactic Inhibition of BCR-ABL Tyrosine Kinase)312828

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Safety Failure

Safety and tolerability of nilotinib therapy in patients with imatinib-sensitive leukemia graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Treatment safety failure is defined for a patient with imatinib sensitive Ph+ leukemia as the inability to be able to deliver at least 400 milligrams per day of nilotinib in adults, and 230 milligrams/m2 per day in children, for at least 85% of the time interval between 81 and 365 days after transplant. The overall study will be considered successful if nilotinib is deliverable to more than 75% of the study participants at this minimum specified dose intensity. (NCT00702403)
Timeframe: Up to 365 days post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Single Arm Nilotinib Relapse Prophylaxis13

[back to top]

Patients Alive With Out Relapse

The proportion of study participants alive and without hematologic, cytogenetic or molecular evidence of BCR/ABL-positive leukemia at 1 year (NCT00702403)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Single Arm Nilotinib Relapse Prophylaxis29

[back to top]

Relapse

The proportion of patients with hematologic, cytogenetic or molecular relapse of BCR/ABL-positive leukemia (NCT00702403)
Timeframe: 1 and 3 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Proportion with relapse at 1 yearProportion with relapse at 3 years
Treatment (Prophylactic Inhibition of BCR-ABL Tyrosine Kinase)56

[back to top]

Percent Change in Absolute Range of Motion (ROM) From Baseline to 6 Months

A change in ROM is 25% or greater from baseline. A partial response required improvement in 25% or more in ROM. Progression required 25% or greater loss of ROM.Patients with negative values in the Table are those who lost ROM. Percent improvement in ROM for 1-3 target joints. For patients with >1 target joint, the average ROM improvement was calculated. The average percentage change in ROM deficit from baseline to 6 months was obtained based on the number of degrees of ROM change (6 months)/total ROM deficit (baseline) at each joint. (NCT00702689)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionPercent change from baseline (Number)
Pt 2 6mo response% change in deficit from baselinePt 7 6mo response% change in deficit from baselinePt 8 6mo response% change in deficit from baselinePt10 6mo response% change in deficit from baselinePt12 6mo response% change in deficit from baselinePt13 6mo response% change in deficit from baselinePt14 6mo response% change in deficit from baselinePt15 6mo response% change in deficit from baselinePt16 6mo response% change in deficit from baselinePt17 6mo response% change in deficit from baselinePt18 6mo response% change in deficit from baselinePt19 6mo response% change in deficit from baselinePt20 6mo response% change in deficit from baseline
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHD94351621166127223-25-23115

[back to top]

Primary Range of Motion (ROM) Response

Progressive disease is defined as joint ROM: decrease of >25% in composite ROM score on 2 consecutive evaluations at least 2 weeks apart, but not greater than 4 weeks apart or steroid pulse: >1 steroid pulse per 3 month period if administered for sclerotic-type chronic graft versus host disease (ScGVHD). Response is joint ROM: increase of >25% in composite ROM score. Maximal response is a response with no further improvement over 2 sequential 3-month evaluations. Stable disease does not meet the criteria for progression, response, or maximal response. (NCT00702689)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Partial ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive Disease
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHD572

[back to top]

Total Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD) Provider Global Rating Score at Baseline and 6 Months

The provider global rating is a physician impression of severity of cGVHD symptoms from a scale of zero (no symptoms) to 10 (most severe GVHD symptoms possible). (NCT00702689)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

InterventionProvider Global Rating Score (Number)
Patient #2 at BaselinePatient #2 at 6 MonthsPatient #3 at BaselinePatient #3 at 6 MonthsPatient #7 at BaselinePatient #7 at 6 MonthsPatient #8 at BaselinePatient #8 at 6 MonthsPatient #10 at BaselinePatient #10 at 6 MonthsPatient #12 at BaselinePatient #12 at 6 MonthsPatient #13 at BaselinePatient #13 at 6 MonthsPatient #14 at BaselinePatient #14 at 6 MonthsPatient # 15 at BaselinePatient #15 at 6 MonthsPatient #16 at BaselinePatient #16 at 6 MonthsPatient #17 at BaselinePatient #17 at 6 monthsPatient #18 at BaselinePatient #18 at 6 MonthsPatient #19 at BaselinePatient #19 at 6 MonthsPatient #20 at BaselinePatient #20 at 6 Months
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHD543NA686754676476765468888588

[back to top]

Total Skin Score at Baseline and 6 Months

Total skin score was graded by the National Institutes of Health Consensus Criteria. Skin score was calculated by dividing the total score by seven domains (skin, eye, oral, joint, gastrointestinal, hepatic, pulmonary) in men and 8 domains in women (previous domains noted plus gynecologic). Total skin score is a percentage of body surface area (BSA) involvement (range 0-100%). It was calculated from the sum of moveable body surface BSA and non-moveable BSA. Higher numbers = greater body surface area affected. (NCT00702689)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 Months

Interventionunits on a scale (Number)
Patient # 2 - BaselinePatient # 2 - 6 monthsPatient # 3 - BaselinePatient # 3 - 6 monthsPatient # 7 - BaselinePatient # 7 - 6 monthsPatient # 8 - BaselinePatient # 8 - 6 monthsPatient # 10 - BaselinePatient # 10 - 6 monthsPatient # 12 - BaselinePatient # 12 - 6 monthsPatient # 13 - BaselinePatient # 13 - 6 monthsPatient # 14 - BaselinePatient # 14 - 6 monthsPatient # 15 - BaselinePatient # 15 - 6 monthsPatient # 16 - BaselinePatient # 16 - 6 monthsPatient # 17 - BaselinePatient # 17 - 6 monthsPatient # 18 - BaselinePatient # 18 - 6 monthsPatient # 19 - BaselinePatient # 19 - 6 monthsPatient # 20 - BaselinePatient # 20 - 6 months
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHD66.65443.38NA66.2455.5353.155.2610.86.1221.2430.0679.262.2839.9640.571.4661.839.548.184.9685.1126.6424.321.1537.823.425.2

[back to top]

Average Percentage Change in Range of Motion (ROM) Deficit

One or more joints were assessed for ROM deficit by a physiatrist with expertise in graft versus host disease and joint ROM. (NCT00702689)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHD24.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Here is the number of participants with serious and non-serious adverse events assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0). A non-serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence. A serious adverse event is an adverse event or suspected adverse reaction that results in death, a life-threatening adverse drug experience, hospitalization, disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect or important medical events that jeopardize the patient or subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the previous outcomes mentioned. (NCT00702689)
Timeframe: Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately, 41 months, 27 days

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHD20

[back to top]

Change in Immunosuppression

Change in immunosuppression was defined by an increase or decrease in steroid use form baseline. (NCT00702689)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
↓ Pred 20 mg everyday (qd )to 5 mg every other day↓ MPred 16 mg every other day(qod) to 4 mg qod↓ Pred:24mg every day(qd) to 20mg qdNo change↓ Tacro 2mg every am 1.5mg every pm to .5mg bidPred↓ 25mg qd to 15mg qd;Tacro↓ 2mg bid to 1mg bidPred↓ 2.5mg qd to 2.5mg every other day↓ Siro:2mg qd to 1 mg qdPred wean then ↑ 10 12.5mg bid;Tacro↑1.0 to 1.5bidMMF↓ 1g/bid to discontinued
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHD1115111111

[back to top]

Lung Function Score at Baseline and 6 Months

Lung function was graded by the National Institutes of Health Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease organ response criteria. The Lung function score = forced expiratory volume 1 (FEV1) score + carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) score, with a possible range of 2 (better outcome)-12 (worst outcome). The percent predicted FEV1 and DLCO (adjusted for hematocrit but not alveolar volume) should be converted to a numeric score as follows: >80% =1; 70-79% = 2; 60-69% = 3; 50-59% = 4; 40-49% = 5; <40% = 6. (NCT00702689)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 Months

Interventionunits on a scale (Number)
Patient #2 at BaselinePatient #2 at 6 MonthsPatient #3 at BaselinePatient #3 at 6 MonthsPatient #7 at BaselinePatient #7 at 6 MonthsPatient #8 at BaselinePatient #8 at 6 MonthsPatient #10 at BaselinePatient #10 at 6 MonthsPatient #12 at BaselinePatient #12 at 6 MonthsPatient #13 at BaselinePatient #13 at 6 MonthsPatient #14 at BaselinePatient #14 at 6 MonthsPatient # 15 at BaselinePatient #15 at 6 MonthsPatient #16 at BaselinePatient #16 at 6 MonthsPatient #17 at BaselinePatient #17 at 6 monthsPatient #18 at BaselinePatient #18 at 6 MonthsPatient #19 at BaselinePatient #19 at 6 MonthsPatient #20 at BaselinePatient #20 at 6 Months
Imatinib Mesylate in Patients With cGVHD229NA385633454455763256889922

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate (DCR)

The Disease Control Rate (Complete Response(CR), Partial Response (PD) and Stable Disease (SD) rates for each treatment arm will be computed using the exact Clopper-Pearson interval estimation methodology. DCR is defined as the percentage of patients with a best overall response of • CR, i.e. at least two determinations of CR at least 4 weeks apart without loss of response between the determinations, • PR, i.e. at least two determinations of PR or better at least 4 weeks apart before progression (and not qualifying for a CR) and without loss of PR between the determinations, or • SD lasting at least 24 weeks, i.e. at least one SD or better response at least 24 weeks after randomization (and not qualifying for CR or PR). (NCT00751036)
Timeframe: every 2 months until 24 months (end of study)

,
InterventionPercentage of Patients (Number)
Disease Control Rate (CR, PR, or SD)Complete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)Stable Disease (SD)Progressive Disease (PD)Unknown (UNK)
Imatinib47.806.541.337.015.2
Nilotinib54.22.14.247.925.020.8

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure

TTF, defined as the time from date of randomization to the earliest of date of the first objective tumor progression, date of death due to any cause, or date of discontinuation due to reasons other than 'Protocol deviation' or 'Administrative problems'. (NCT00751036)
Timeframe: Time from date of radomization to the earliest date of the first objective tumor, death or discontinuation, assesed until 24 months.

InterventionDays (Median)
Nilotinib90.00
Imatinib112.00

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival (PFS) is the time from date of randomization to the date of first documented progression or death due to any cause. If a participant has not had an event, progression-free survival is censored at the time of last adequate tumor assessment. Progression is defined according to modified RECIST criteria as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, worsening of the non-target lesions or the appearance of one or more new lesions. (NCT00751036)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionDays (Median)
Nilotinib111.00
Imatinib120.00

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

. OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause or the date of last contact prior to or on the date of data cutoff. The median time to overall survival and its associated 95 % CI will be derived, for each treatment arm, using the time to event analysis based on Kaplan-Meier methodology. (NCT00751036)
Timeframe: time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause or the date of last contact prior to or on the date of data cutoff, assesed until 24 months.

InterventionDays (Median)
Nilotinib737
Imatinib594.00

[back to top]

Rate of Confirmed Best Cumulative CMR

The rate of confirmed best cumulative CMR was defined as the number of participants who had confirmed CMR during the 24, 36 and 48 months post treatment after the randomization date. Participants who achieved confirmed best cumulative CMR during the first 12 months were considered responders. Participants who dropped out early or who did not provide sufficient data for any reason were considered to be non-responders. The definition of CMR is undetectable BCR-ABL (fusion gene formed between bcr gene from chromosome 22 and abl gene from chromosome 9) where BCR-ABL ratio in % international scale (IS) ≤ 0.00001 by RQ-PCR where there was no detectable BCR-ABL and 1) the test had a sensitivity of at least 4.5 logs below the standardized baseline; 2) RQ-PCR negativity was confirmed on the next RQ-PCR sample (usually 3 months later); and 3) the date of confirmed CMR was the date of the first of two negative results with sensitivity >4.5 logs. (NCT00760877)
Timeframe: 24 months, 36 month, 48 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
24 months, Responders24 months, Non-responders36 months, Responders36 months, Non-responders48 months, Responders48 months, Non-responders
Imatinib119221822182
Nilotinib248029753272

[back to top]

Rate of Confirmed Best Cumulative Complete Molecular Response (CMR)

The rate of confirmed best cumulative CMR was defined as the number of participants who had confirmed CMR during the first 12 months of treatment after the randomization date. Participants who achieved confirmed best cumulative CMR during the first 12 months were considered responders. Participants who dropped out early or who did not provide sufficient data for any reason were considered to be non-responders. The definition of CMR is undetectable BCR-ABL (fusion gene formed between bcr gene from chromosome 22 and abl gene from chromosome 9) where BCR-ABL ratio in % international scale (IS) ≤ 0.00001 by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) where there was no detectable BCR-ABL and 1) the test had a sensitivity of at least 4.5 logs below the standardized baseline; 2) RQ-PCR negativity was confirmed on the next RQ-PCR sample (usually 3 months later); and 3) the date of confirmed CMR was the date of the first of two negative results with sensitivity >4.5 logs. (NCT00760877)
Timeframe: 12 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
RespondersNon-responders
Imatinib697
Nilotinib1391

[back to top]

Event-free Survival

Event-free survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first occurrence of any of the following events on study treatment: loss of complete hematological response, confirmed loss of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), confirmed loss of major molecular response (MMR), death from any cause during treatment, progression to the accelerated phase or blast crisis of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) per European Leukemia Network (ELN) criteria, whichever was earliest. (NCT00760877)
Timeframe: 48 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
NilotinibNA
ImatinibNA

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause at any time during the study, including the follow-up period after discontinuation of treatment. (NCT00760877)
Timeframe: 48 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
NilotinibNA
ImatinibNA

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the earliest documented progression-defining event as follows: transformation to blast crisis or accelerated phase disease, or death from any cause. (NCT00760877)
Timeframe: 48 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
NilotinibNA
ImatinibNA

[back to top]

Number of Cross-over Participants With CMR

The definition of CMR is undetectable BCR-ABL (fusion gene formed between bcr gene from chromosome 22 and abl gene from chromosome 9) where BCR-ABL ratio in % international scale (IS) ≤ 0.00001 by RQ-PCR where there was no detectable BCR-ABL and 1) the test had a sensitivity of at least 4.5 logs below the standardized baseline; 2) RQ-PCR negativity was confirmed on the next RQ-PCR sample (usually 3 months later); and 3) the date of confirmed CMR was the date of the first of two negative results with sensitivity >4.5 logs. (NCT00760877)
Timeframe: 24 months, 36 months, 48 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
24 months36 months48 months
Nilotinib369

[back to top]

Time to Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause. Progression is defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions (NCT00785785)
Timeframe: up to month 37

Interventionmonths (Median)
Nilotinib25.9
Imatinib29.7

[back to top]

Duration of CCyR

Duration of CCyR was defined as time from the date of ransomization to the date of first loss of CCyR or death, whichever came first. (NCT00802841)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
NilotinibNA
Imatinib17.2

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as time from date of randomization to the date of the death. (NCT00802841)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
NilotinibNA
Imatinib25.7

[back to top]

Time to CCyR

Time to CCyR was defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documented CCyR. (NCT00802841)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Nilotinib5.55
Imatinib5.85

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With CCyr

CCyR was assessed from bone marrow samples. CCyr was defined as having 0% Philadelphia positive (Ph+) chromosome metaphases in bone marrow. (NCT00802841)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 months

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
12 months24 months
Imatinib55.861.1
Nilotinib53.151.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR)

MMR was defined as having a fusion gene of the Bcr and Abl genes of (BCR-ACL) less than or equal to 0.1% on the International Scale (IS). (NCT00802841)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 months

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
12 months24 months
Imatinib25.335.8
Nilotinib36.537.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR)

CCyR was assessed from bone marrow samples. CCyr was defined as having 0% Philadelphia positive (Ph+) chromosome metaphases in bone marrow. (NCT00802841)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Nilotinib50.0
Imatinib42.1

[back to top]

Event-Free Survival (EFS)

EFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first occurrence of any of the following: loss of Complete Hematological Response (CHR), loss of Partial Cytogenetic Response (PCyR), loss of CCyR, death on treatment or progression to AP/BC. (NCT00802841)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
NilotinibNA
Imatinib24.3

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of documented disease progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis (AP/BC), or death due to any cause. (NCT00802841)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
NilotinibNA
ImatinibNA

[back to top]

Progression-free-tolerance

This is defined as the percentage of participants who continued on treatment with no progression at 12 weeks since the start of treatment.A patient will be considered to have progression-free-tolerance if she does not drop out due to toxicity and does not have disease progression or die by the completion of 12 weeks on treatment. (NCT00840450)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Paclitaxel and Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec)75

[back to top]

the Best Overall Clinical Response

This is defined as the percentage of participants who had either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR) as the best overall response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) for measurable disease or CA-125 criteria for non-measurable disease. The response is evaluated at 12 weeks of treatment. (NCT00840450)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Paclitaxel and Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec)33

[back to top]

Progression-free-survival at 12 Months

This defined as the percentage of participants who had progression free survival at 12 months from the beginning of the treatment. (NCT00840450)
Timeframe: up to 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Paclitaxel and Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec)17

[back to top]

Time to PSA Progression

Time to PSA pregression is defined as the time at which therapy statred and ends when the PSA increased by 50% above the nadir confirmed on a second determination. (NCT00861471)
Timeframe: up to 2 years

Interventiondays (Mean)
Docetaxel +Gleevec188

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response

PSA response is defined as a greater than or equal to a 50% decrease in PSA from the baseline without clinical or radiologic evidence of progression according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). PSA concentration was measured at baseline on day 1/cycle 1 before treatment, then day 1 of every cycle afterwards during therapy. (NCT00861471)
Timeframe: up to 9 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Docetaxel +Gleevec50

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Measurable Disease Response

Measurable disease response is defined as the number of participants whose best response is complete response or partial response over the number of patients with measurable desease according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). (NCT00861471)
Timeframe: up to 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Docetaxel +Gleevec20

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival Time

Overall survival time is the time from the start of therapy till death. Median overall survival reported here is the time when 50% of the participants are alive. (NCT00861471)
Timeframe: up to 4 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Docetaxel +Gleevec24.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Greater or Equal to 80% PSA Reduction From Baseline Without Clinical or Radiologic Evidence of Progression

PSA was measured at baseline on day 1/cycle 1 before treatment, then day 1 of every cycle afterwards during therapy. (NCT00861471)
Timeframe: up to 9 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Docetaxel +Gleevec16

[back to top]

Recurrence-free Survival up to 60 Months

Recurrence-free survival assessment is based on the radiologic evidence and is defined as the time from the date of first dose of imatinib to the date of the first documented disease recurrence or death due to any cause (event). (NCT00867113)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 60 months

Interventionparticipants with an event (Number)
Subject with an eventEvent = disease recurrenceEvent=deathSubjects censored
Imatinib97282

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) at 60 Months

Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of the first dose of study drug to the date of death. Subjects who were alive at the time of discontinuation/completion of the study were censored at the end of study date or end of treatment visit date if the subject refused to be followed post treatment. Full analysis set. (NCT00867113)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 60 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
subjects who diedsubjects censored
Imatinib388

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Recurrence-free Survival up to 60 Months

Recurrence-free survival (RFS) assessment is based on the radiologic evidence and is defined as the time from the date of first dose of imatinib to the date of the first documented disease recurrence or death due to any cause (event). RFS estimates were summarized using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method (Kaplan 1958). Censoring rules for RFS with the earliest occurring rule used in the analysis: subjects without objective recurrence of disease who were alive at the time of their discontinuation from study were censored at the end of study date or end of treatment visit date if the subject refused to be followed post treatment and subjects recording antineoplastic therapy during the study were censored on the date of the therapy initiated (NCT00867113)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 60 months

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
12 months18 months24 months36 months48 months60 months
Imatinib97.797.796.595.195.190.1

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Overall Survival (OS) up to 60 Months

Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of the first dose of study drug to the date of death. Subjects who were alive at the time of discontinuation/completion of the study were censored at the end of study date or end of treatment visit date if the subject refused to be followed post treatment. Full analysis set. (NCT00867113)
Timeframe: Baseline up to appoximately 60 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
12 months18 months24 months36 months48 months60 months
Imatinib100.00100.0098.098.098.093.8

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Adverse Events

Information about all adverse events, whether volunteered by the subject, discovered by investigator questioning, or detected through physical examination, laboratory test or other means, will be collected and recorded. (NCT00867334)
Timeframe: From consent up until 4 weeks after patient has stopped study participation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment With Increasing Doses of Imatinib5
Standard of Care Therapy With Panitumumab0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Stabilization or Reduction in Tumor Size

Results reported as number of patients with stabilization or reduction in tumor size. Tumor response is defined by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) solid tumor response criteria, evaluated by CT. (NCT00867334)
Timeframe: 8 weeks after baseline

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment With Increasing Doses of Imatinib3
Standard of Care Therapy With Panitumumab0

[back to top]

Level of Methylation

the percentage of methylated DNA (NCT00882206)
Timeframe: Day 0

Interventionpercentage of DNA (Mean)
Decitabine / Vorinostat84.98

[back to top]

Level of Methylation

the percentage of methylated DNA (NCT00882206)
Timeframe: Day 33

Interventionpercentage of DNA (Mean)
Decitabine / Vorinostat86.1

[back to top]

Level of Methylation

the percentage of methylated DNA (NCT00882206)
Timeframe: Day 5

Interventionpercentage of DNA (Mean)
Decitabine / Vorinostat79.82

[back to top]

Response to Treatment

Response includes both complete remission (defined as <5% leukemic blasts in the bone marrow) and partial remission (defined as a greater than 35% reduction in the bone marrow leukemia blast percentage at day 33) (NCT00882206)
Timeframe: Day 33

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Decitabine / Vorinostat6

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Survival at 48 Weeks

(NCT00891527)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Avastin and/or Gleevec42

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Disease Progression at 48 Weeks

"Patients will be classified as having disease progression if at least 2 pulmonary veins have significantly worsened at 48 weeks. This determination is based on the study defined Pulmonary Vein Status Scale, which categorizes pulmonary veins on a scale from 1- None: No narrowing of the luminal contour, to 7- Distal atretic: Complete obliteration of the luminal contour extending >5mm within the vessel segment." (NCT00891527)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Avastin and/or Gleevec5

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Disease Stabilization at 48 Weeks

(NCT00891527)
Timeframe: 48 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Avastin and/or Gleevec15

[back to top]

Clinical Worsening Comparing Imatinib Versus Placebo for Adjudicated Cases

Clinical worsening per participant was measured by the onset of any adjudicated event (all cause mortality; overnight hospitalization for worsening of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH); worsening of WHO functional class by one level; 15% decline in Six Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) measured on two consecutive occasions) at 24 weeks treatment, comparing imatinib to placebo groups. A cox regression analysis model was used. (NCT00902174)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Imatinib35.9
Placebo32.7

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of QTI571 200 mg and Its Metabolite (GCP74588) Pre-dose and Between 0 Hour to 3 Hour Post-dose Per Participant

"Blood samples were taken from each subject participating in the study (placebo group and active treatment group) once predose and once between 0 hour to 3 hour post dose at day 1 (baseline), day 14, day 28 and day 168.~The parent compound QTI571 and its active metabolite, GCP74588, were measured in plasma by validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) assay." (NCT00902174)
Timeframe: predose and between 0 hour to 3 hour post dose at day 1, day 14, day 28 and day 168

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Day 1 - predose (n=77 imat; n=77 GCP)Day 1 - 0-3h post-dose (n=77 imat; n=77 GCP)Day 14 - predose (n=18 imat; n=18 GCP)Day 14 - 0-3h post-dose (n=19 imat; n=19 GCP)Day 28 - predose (n=20 imat; n=20 GCP)Day 28 - 0-3h post-dose (n=19 imat; n=19 GCP)Day 168 predose (n=24 imat; n=24 GCP)Day 168- 0-3h post-dose (n=23 imat; n=23 GCP)
GCP74588061.8178.8233.8228.6323.9126.6166.1
Imatinib 200 mg0471.9579.61005.7658.81438.6398.6710.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic Arterial Blood Pressure

Change from baseline in systolic arterial blood pressure (mmHg) was measured via right heart catheterization according to the local hospital procedures. The systolic arterial blood was assessed when the participant was in a stable hemodynamic rest state. (NCT00902174)
Timeframe: baseline and week 24

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Imatinib-2.92
Placebo-1.15

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systemic Vascular Resistance

Change from baseline in systemic vascular resistance (dynes*sec*cm^-5) was measured via right heart catheterization according to the local hospital procedures. The systemic vascular resistance was assessed when the participant was in a stable hemodynamic rest state. Reduction from baseline in mean systemic vascular resistance indicates improvement. (NCT00902174)
Timeframe: baseline and week 24

Interventiondynes*sec*cm^-5 (Least Squares Mean)
Imatinib-467.84
Placebo-88.10

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Right Atrial Pressure

Change from baseline in right atrial pressure (mmHg) was measured via right heart catheterization according to the local hospital procedures. The right atrial pressure was assessed when the participant was in a stable hemodynamic rest state. A higher right atrial pressure number indicates worsening. (NCT00902174)
Timeframe: baseline and week 24

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Imatinib-1.02
Placebo0.68

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance

Change from baseline in pulmonary vascular resistance (dynes*sec*cm^-5) was measured via right heart catheterization according to the local hospital procedures. The pulmonary vascular resistance was assessed when the participant was in a stable hemodynamic rest state. Reduction from baseline in pulmonary vascular resistance indicates improvement. (NCT00902174)
Timeframe: baseline and week 24

Interventiondynes*sec*cm^-5 (Least Squares Mean)
Imatinib-366.47
Placebo12.12

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pulmonary Resistance Index

Change from baseline in pulmonary resistance index (dynes*sec*cm^-5/m2) was measured via right heart catheterization according to the local hospital procedures. The pulmonary resistance index was assessed when the participant was in a stable hemodynamic rest state. A reduction from baseline in pulmonary resistance index indicates improvement. (NCT00902174)
Timeframe: baseline and week 24

Interventiondynes*sec*cm^-5/m2 (Least Squares Mean)
Imatinib-221.29
Placebo21.92

[back to top]

Covariance of End of Study CAMPHOR Score

The CAMPHOR test consists of 65 items and 3 scales. Two scales measure Health Related Quality of Life. 1) Symptoms: consists of 25 items measuring loss or abnormality of psychological, physiological or anatomical structure or function; further sub-divided into 3 subscales (energy, breathlessness and mood), 2) Disability: consists of 15 items measuring any restriction or lack of ability to perform an activity. 3) Quality of Life (QOL): consists of 25 items defining how individuals perceived ability and capacity to satisfy their needs. The 25-item symptom and QOL scales score from 0-25 where a higher score indicates the presence of more symptoms and poor QOL, respectively. The 15-item functioning scale scores 0-30; a higher score indicates poor functioning. (NCT00902174)
Timeframe: Week 24

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Symptoms scoreActivity scoreQuality of life score
Imatinib7.938.997.45
Placebo9.0310.557.13

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure

Change from baseline in mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (mmHg)was measured via right heart catheterization according to the local hospital procedures. The right atrial mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was assessed when the participant was in a stable hemodynamic rest state. (NCT00902174)
Timeframe: baseline and week 24

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Imatinib0.92
Placebo-0.05

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Pulmonary Arterial Pressure

Change from baseline in mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mmHg) was measured via right heart catheterization according to the local hospital procedures. The mean pulmonary arterial pressure was assessed when the participant was in a stable hemodynamic rest state. A higher mean pulmonary arterial pressure number indicates worsening. (NCT00902174)
Timeframe: baseline and week 24

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Imatinib-3.54
Placebo1.63

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Heart Rate

Change from baseline in heart rate (bpm) was measured via right heart catheterization according to the local hospital procedures. The heart rate was assessed when the participant was in a stable hemodynamic rest state. (NCT00902174)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionbpm (Least Squares Mean)
Imatinib0.38
Placebo0.73

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Diastolic Arterial Blood Pressure

Change from baseline in diastolic arterial blood pressure (mmHg) was measured via right heart catheterization according to the local hospital procedures. The diastolic arterial blood pressure was assessed when the participant was in a stable hemodynamic rest state. (NCT00902174)
Timeframe: baseline and week 24

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Imatinib-3.81
Placebo-1.48

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cardiac Output

Change from baseline in cardiac output (L/min) was measured via right heart catheterization according to the local hospital procedures. The cardiac output was assessed when the participant was in a stable hemodynamic rest state. An increase from baseline (higher number) in cardiac output indicates improvement. (NCT00902174)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionLiters/minute (Least Squares Mean)
Imatinib1.17
Placebo0.29

[back to top]

Change in Borg Dyspnea Score During 6-minute Walk Test

Change in Borg scale was measured at different time points at week 24. The Borg Scale consists of scale range of 0 to 10. Participants pointed to indicate their level of dyspnea before and at the end of exercise testing (where 0 indicates no breathlessness at all and 10 indicates maximum breathlessness). A reduction in this score indicates an improvement. (NCT00902174)
Timeframe: week 24

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Resting (n= 86 imatinib; 89 placebo)End of test (n= 92 imatinib; 91 placebo)2 min after end (n= 82 imatinib; 81 placebo)End of test - Resting (n= 81 imatinib; 81 placebo)2 min after end - end of test (n= 82 ima; 81plb)
Imatinib-0.06-0.38-0.37-0.24-0.07
Placebo-0.12-0.24-0.18-0.29-0.03

[back to top]

Difference in Six-minute Walk Distance Test (6MWD) Between Imatinib and Placebo at 24 Weeks

This standardized walk course was 30 meters in length. During the walk the participant was connected to a portable pulse oximeter via a finger probe. Participants were instructed to walk at a comfortable speed for as far as they could manage in 6 minutes. The total distance walked (in meters) was recorded. Results were compared between the 2 groups. (NCT00902174)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionmeters (Least Squares Mean)
Imatinib382.94
Placebo351.18

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of QTI571 400 mg and Its Metabolite (GCP74588) Pre-dose and Between 0 Hour to 3 Hour Post-dose Per Participant

"Blood samples were taken from each subject participating in the study (placebo group and active treatment group) once predose and once between 0 hour to 3 hour post dose at day 1 (baseline), day 14, day 28 and day 168.~The parent compound QTI571 and its active metabolite, GCP74588, were measured in plasma by validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) assay." (NCT00902174)
Timeframe: predose and between 0 hour to 3 hour post dose at day 1, day 14, day 28 and day 168

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Day 1 - predose (n=12 imat; n=12 GCP)Day 1 - 0-3h post-dose (n=13 imat; n=13 GCP)Day 14 - predose (n=62 imat; n=62 GCP)Day 14 - 0-3h post-dose (n=62 imat; n=62 GCP)Day 28 - predose (n=55 imat; n=55 GCP)Day 28 - 0-3h post-dose (n=58 imat; n=58 GCP)Day 168 predose (n=36 imat; n=36 GCP)Day 168- 0-3h post-dose (n=35 imat; n=35 GCP)
GCP745880109.9155.1233.7248.2320.7241.4348.0
Imatinib 400 mg0843.2516.51172.8829.81335.3869.91616.1

[back to top]

Tumor Response Rates Using Modified SWOG Criteria to the Combination of Gleevec and Gemzar in Patients With Relapsed Ovarian Cancer Who Have Failed at Least One Prior Chemotherapy Treatment.

"Best response to thearpy was assessed using modified SWOG criteria (same as for outcome masure #1). Subjects were assess as complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease after 2 cycles (6 weeks) of beginning treatment and every 6 weeks afterward until progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, or subject withdrawl from study.~the measurement reported is the number of patients who met the criteria for partial response." (NCT00928642)
Timeframe: Subjects treated until progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity. no maximum dose was specified

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Oral Imatinib Plus IV Gemcitabine0

[back to top]

To Estimate the Clinical Response Rate(Partial and Complete Response as Defined Under the SWOG Criterial)

"Using SWOG criteria for response of measurable disease, subject best response was assessed. First assessment was 6 weeks after starting treatment. Subjequent evaluations were every 6 weeks in patients who remained on study.~Repsonse rate was the sum of Complete Repsonse and Partial Response." (NCT00928642)
Timeframe: until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment0

[back to top]

To Determine the Distribution of the Overall Survival

All subjects were followed after treatment was complete to assess overall survival. (NCT00928642)
Timeframe: Until death

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment9

[back to top]

The Cystostatic, Anti-tumor Activity of the Combination of Gleevec and Gemzar Via Progression-free Survival for at Least Six Months in Patients With Recurrent or Persistent Epithelial Ovarian or Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma.

Progression free survival at six months was assessed for all research subjects. Progression defined by SWOG criteria: Invest New Drugs. 1992 Nov;10(4):239-53. Progression is defined as > 50% increase in the sume of measured cross sectional area of areasa of measurable disease, measured from the lowest measured amount of disease. Progression is also defined as new areas of measurabe disease. (NCT00928642)
Timeframe: Time to progression was measured from enrollment in study until documented disease progression over a period not greater than 2 years.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Oral Imatinib Plus Gemcitabine0

[back to top]

To Determine the Safety and Tolerability Via Frequency and Severity of Adverse Effect of Combination Gleevec and Gemzar in This Cohort of Patients as Assessed Byt Common Toxicity Criteria

Toxicity was assess prior to each cycle of therapy (every 3 weeks) and graded based on NCI common toxicity criteria (NCT00928642)
Timeframe: Until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade 3 toxicityGrade 4 toxicityRed Blood Cell Transfusion
Oral Imatinib Puls IV Gemcitabine311

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

Overall Response Rate: Morphologic Complete Remission (CR) + Morphologic Complete Remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) for evaluable participants. CR - Bone Marrow: < 5% blasts without Auer rods with at least 20% cellularity with maturation of all cell lines, No presence of unique phenotype by flow cytometry identical to what was found in the pretreatment specimen, No persistent dysplasia; Peripheral: normal blood counts, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 1.0 k/μl and platelets > 100 k/μl ANC > 1.0 k/μl and platelets > 100 k/μl (Peripheral blood counts documenting recovery can be utilized within 4 weeks of the bone marrow); No evidence of extramedullary leukemia. CRi - All CR criteria are met except for residual Neutropenia <1.0 x 10^9/L platelets < 100 k/μl. (NCT00955916)
Timeframe: 8 weeks per participant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CLAG Regimen With Gleevec®37

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival (OS)

Overall Survival is defined as the time from randomization until death from any cause. (NCT00955916)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
CLAG Regimen With Gleevec®4.9

[back to top]

Median Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Progression Free Survival is defined as the duration of time from start of treatment to time of progression. Leukemia related failure (progressive disease): Failure to induce bone marrow hypoplasia after 2 cycles or regrowth of leukemic blasts ≥ 20%. (NCT00955916)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
CLAG Regimen With Gleevec®11.1

[back to top] [back to top]

Toxicities

Adverse events of grade 3 or higher, according to CTCAE version 3 (NCT01011075)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionNumber of events (Number)
Imatinib Mesylate and Paclitaxel34

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Number of months post treatment without measurable progression according to RECIST criteria (version 1.0) (NCT01011075)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Imatinib Mesylate and Paclitaxel3.6

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival as measured by the Kaplan-Meier method (NCT01011075)
Timeframe: 12 Months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Imatinib Mesylate and Paclitaxel7.3

[back to top]

Response Rate

Response rates according to RECIST criteria (version 1.0) expressed as percentage of evaluable patients. (NCT01011075)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Imatinib Mesylate and Paclitaxel32

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the duration of time from start of treatment to time of progression. It will be determined for both RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) and CHOI criteria. (NCT01089595)
Timeframe: 6 months until death or for 5 years

Interventionweeks (Mean)
Nilotinib13
Nilotinib + Imatinib16

[back to top]

Best Overall Response Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, Choi Criteria, and Positron Emission Tomography Imaging

(NCT01089595)
Timeframe: Every 8 weeks for up to 5 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Stable DiseasePartial ResponseComplete Response
Nilotinib200
Nilotinib + Imatinib010

[back to top]

Airway Wall Area

Change in airway wall area as assessed by computerized tomography (CT) (NCT01097694)
Timeframe: 6 months after start of treatment

Intervention% of area (Mean)
Imatinib Mesylate0.0002
Placebo0.0002

[back to top]

Airway Wall Thickness

Change in airway wall thickness as assessed by computerized tomography (CT) (NCT01097694)
Timeframe: 6 months after start of treatment

Intervention% of airway (Mean)
Imatinib Mesylate-0.0040
Placebo-0.0027

[back to top]

Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)

Change in patient-reported Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) score The asthma quality of life questionnaire (AQLQ) is a 32-item scale with a range from 1-7 with a higher value denoting improvement. The minimal important difference is 0.5. (NCT01097694)
Timeframe: 6 months after start of treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Imatinib Mesylate0.55
Placebo0.25

[back to top]

Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI)

Change in patient reported ASUI score The asthma symptom utility index (ASUI) is a 10-item weighted scale with a range from 0.2 to 1 with a higher value indicating improvement. The minimal important difference is 0.09. (NCT01097694)
Timeframe: 6 months after start of treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Imatinib Mesylate0.07
Placebo0.05

[back to top]

BAL Eosinophil %

Change in BAL eosinophil percentage (NCT01097694)
Timeframe: 6 months after start of treatment

Intervention% eosinophils (Mean)
Imatinib Mesylate2.55
Placebo-2.63

[back to top]

Endobronchial Biopsy Smooth Muscle Tryptase-positive Mast Cells

Change in the biopsy smooth muscle tryptase-positive mast cells from baseline at 6 months (NCT01097694)
Timeframe: 6 months after start of treatment

Interventionmast cells per mm2 (Mean)
Imatinib Mesylate-102.7
Placebo-79.2

[back to top]

Endobronchial Biopsy Total Tryptase-positive Mast Cells

Change in endobronchial biopsy total tryptase-positive mast cells from baseline at 6 months (NCT01097694)
Timeframe: 6 months after start of treatment

Interventionmast cells per mm2 (Mean)
Imatinib Mesylate-54.2
Placebo-32.3

[back to top]

Evening Peak Flow

Change in patient-reported evening peak flow measurement (L/s) (NCT01097694)
Timeframe: 6 months after start of treatment

InterventionL/second (Mean)
Imatinib Mesylate8.3
Placebo-8.2

[back to top]

FEV1 in Liters

Change in FEV1 in treatment group compared to placebo group (NCT01097694)
Timeframe: 6 months after start of treatment

InterventionL (Mean)
Imatinib Mesylate0.046
Placebo0

[back to top]

Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) PGD2

Change in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) PGD2 levels from baseline at 6 months (NCT01097694)
Timeframe: 6 months after start of treatment

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Imatinib Mesylate12.2
Placebo-4.2

[back to top]

Urinary Leukotriene E4

Change in urinary leukotriene E4 levels from baseline (NCT01097694)
Timeframe: 6 months after start of treatment

Interventionng/mg Creatinine (Mean)
Imatinib Mesylate0.07
Placebo0.01

[back to top]

Serum Total Tryptase

Change in serum total tryptase after 24 weeks of imatinib vs placebo treatment (NCT01097694)
Timeframe: 6 months after start of treatment

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Imatinib Mesylate-2.02
Placebo-0.56

[back to top]

Number of Asthma Exacerbations

Number of asthma exacerbations experienced from randomization to study completion. (NCT01097694)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

Interventionevents (Number)
Imatinib Mesylate16
Placebo20

[back to top]

Morning Peak Flow Measurement

Change in patient-reported morning peak flow measurement (L/s) (NCT01097694)
Timeframe: 6 months after start of treatment

InterventionL/second (Mean)
Imatinib Mesylate7.3
Placebo-6.4

[back to top]

Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO)

Change in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide Measurement (ppb) (NCT01097694)
Timeframe: 6 months after start of treatment

Interventionparts per billion (Mean)
Imatinib Mesylate7.89
Placebo-5.92

[back to top]

Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)

Change in patient-reported ACQ score The six-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6) is a scale from 0 to 6 with a lower value denoting an improvement in asthma control. The minimal important difference is 0.5. (NCT01097694)
Timeframe: 6 months after start of treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Imatinib Mesylate-0.62
Placebo-0.49

[back to top]

Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) Fluid Tryptase Level

Change in BAL fluid tryptase levels after 24 weeks of imatinib vs. placebo (NCT01097694)
Timeframe: 6 months after start of treatment

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Imatinib Mesylate-0.74
Placebo0.43

[back to top]

Blood Eosinophils

Change in blood eosinophil count (NCT01097694)
Timeframe: 6 months after start of treatment

Interventioneosinophils per microliter (Mean)
Imatinib Mesylate-10.2
Placebo-2.6

[back to top]

Bronchoalveolar Lavage Histamine

Change in bronchoalveolar lavage histamine levels from baseline (NCT01097694)
Timeframe: 6 months after start of treatment

InterventionnM (Mean)
Imatinib Mesylate2.1
Placebo-1.1

[back to top]

Change in Maximum Post-Bronchodilator (BD) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) %

(NCT01097694)
Timeframe: 6 months after start of treatment

Intervention% of predicted (Mean)
Imatinib Mesylate0.01
Placebo-0.08

[back to top]

Change in Mean Methacholine Responsiveness as Assessed by the Provocation Concentration Causing a 20% Fall in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) (PC20) at Month 3 and 6 Versus Baseline

"Our primary outcome was change in airway hyperresponsiveness, as assessed by PC20, from baseline to 3 and/or 6 months of therapy in imatinib treated participants as compared with controls. Change in PC20 was assessed using log2-transformed ratios of PC20 at month 3 and /or month 6 vs PC20 at baseline. Our null hypothesis was that the mean of this ratio will be 0 after log2-transformed. We used a linear mixed-effects model for a repeated-measures analysis to compare the primary outcome between the two groups.~PC20 is determined by the provocation concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)." (NCT01097694)
Timeframe: Over 6 months from beginning of treatment

InterventionLog2 Ratio (Mean)
Imatinib Mesylate1.73
Placebo1.07

[back to top]

FEV1%

Change in FEV1% of predicted (NCT01097694)
Timeframe: 6 months after start of treatment

Intervention% of predicted (Mean)
Imatinib Mesylate2.3
Placebo0.78

[back to top]

BAL Neutrophil %

Change in BAL neutrophil percentage from baseline (NCT01097694)
Timeframe: 6 months after start of treatment

Intervention% neutrophils (Mean)
Imatinib Mesylate-0.8
Placebo-0.4

[back to top]

Bronchoalveolar Lavage Cysteinyl Leukotrienes

Change in bronchoalveolar lavage cysteinyl leukotrienes levels from baseline (NCT01097694)
Timeframe: 6 months after start of treatment

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Imatinib Mesylate3.0
Placebo6.5

[back to top]

Urinary Prostaglandin D2

Change in urinary Prostaglandin D2 levels from baseline (NCT01097694)
Timeframe: 6 months after start of treatment

Interventionng/mg Creatinine (Mean)
Imatinib Mesylate-0.30
Placebo0.39

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Deaths

Adverse event monitoring was conducted throughout the study. (NCT01117987)
Timeframe: 204 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Adverse events (non-serious and serious)Serious adverse eventsDeaths
Core Imatinib62406
Core Placebo765310

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Incidence of Clinical Worsening Events

Clinical worsening events included death, overnight hospitalization for worsening of PAH, worsening of World Health Organization (WHO) functional class by at least one level (drop in WHO ), 15% decrease in the 6MWD as compared to baseline confirmed by two 6MWTs at two consecutive study visits (6MWD reduction), and drop in WHO & 6MWD reduction. Some participants have fulfilled more than one criterion. Therefore, the sum of individual components may be higher than the total number of participants with clinical worsening. (NCT01117987)
Timeframe: 204 weeks

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Total participants with clinical worseningDeath (all deaths)Hospitalization for worsening of PAHDrop in WHO6MWD reductionDrop in WHO and 6MWD reduction
Core Imatinib50.07.633.324.212.11.5
Core Placebo46.212.828.219.219.23.8

[back to top]

Change From Core Study Baseline in Six-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)

A six minute walk test (6MWT) was performed in accordance with the guidleines of the American Thoracic Society (2002). (NCT01117987)
Timeframe: core study baseline, extension baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks, 72 weeks, 96 weeks, 120 weeks, 144 weeks, 156 weeks, 204 weeks

,
Interventionmeters (Mean)
Extension baseline (n=61,77)Week 12 (n=58,57)Week 24 (n=54,53)Week 48 (n=47,42)Week 72 (n=40,39)Week 96 (n=38,35)Week 120 (n=32,29)Week 144 (n=27,21)Week 156 (n=21,18)Week 204 (n=4,3)
Core Imatinib42.9848.7544.7145.8149.5466.6483.1967.7072.6096.88
Core Placebo4.9116.2519.3429.1856.4641.0337.4339.4530.174.50

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

To compare PFS assessed by investigators (NCT01151852)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

InterventionMonths (Median)
Imatinib1.8
Placebo1.7

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

To compare the progression free survival (PFS) assessed by the blinded independent central review following resumption of dosing (re-challenge) with Imatinib plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care in patients with unresectable or metastatic GIST following failure of at least prior imatinib and sunitinib therapies (NCT01151852)
Timeframe: up tp12 weeks

InterventionMonths (Median)
Imatinib1.8
Placebo0.9

[back to top]

Response Rate

"Tumour responses were initially determined by the local investigators in accordance with RECIST 1.0.Treatment decisions were based on local onsite radiological review. All imaging data were subsequently collected, anonymised, and reviewed centrally in a double-blind manner by two external academic radiology reviewers.~Response assessment was determined in a masked central review by use of RECIST1.1." (NCT01151852)
Timeframe: Up to 12weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Imatinib0
Placebo0

[back to top]

Safety and Tolerability of Imatinib

percentage of patients who experienced toxicity from study treatment to evaluate the safety and tolerability of imatinib re-challenge in this patient population (NCT01151852)
Timeframe: Up to 3years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Imatinib100
Placebo98

[back to top]

Overall Survival(OS) and Time to Progression(TTP)

To compare the overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) in both arms of the study (NCT01151852)
Timeframe: Up to 3years

,
InterventionMonths (Median)
Overall survivalTime to progression
Imatinib8.21.8
Placebo7.50.9

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate

"Inclusion of complete response, partial response or stable disease~Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR; Progressive disease (PD), >20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD), Insufficient change to qualify for PR or PD." (NCT01151852)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Imatinib32
Placebo5

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Progression-free Survival (PFS) on Treatment

"Progression-free survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of event defined as the first disease progression to AP/BC or the date of death from any cause, whichever is earlier. This variable was analyzed in 2 ways:~On-treatment: included progressions to AP/BC or deaths occurring only on-treatment in the study as events. The time was censored at the date of last on-treatment assessment (hematology, extramedullary disease or cytogenetic evaluation) in the study before the cut-off date of the analysis for patients without event.~On-study: included progressions to AP/BC or deaths occurring in the study or during the follow-up period after discontinuation of study treatment as events. The time was censored at the last assessment date in the study for patients who were still being treated and at the date of last contact for patients who discontinued treatment." (NCT01275196)
Timeframe: End of study (up to 40 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
ImatinibNA
NilotinibNA

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Time to First CCYR

Time to first CCyR (months) = (date of first CCyR - date of randomization + 1) / 30.4375. (NCT01275196)
Timeframe: End of study (up to 40 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Imatinib6.1
Nilotinib5.6

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Time to First MMR

Time to first MMR (months) = (date of first MMR or censoring - date of randomization + 1) / 30.4375. (NCT01275196)
Timeframe: End of study (up to 40 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Imatinib21.7
Nilotinib8.1

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Time to Progression to Accelerated Phase/Blast Crisis (AP/BC) on Treatment

"Time to progression to AP/BC was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of event defined as the first disease progression to AP/BC or the date of CML-related death, whichever is earlier. This variable was analyzed in 2 ways:~On-treatment: included progressions to AP/BC or CML-related deaths occurring on treatment in the study as events. The time was censored at the date of last on-treatment assessment (hematology, extramedullary disease, or cytogenetic evaluation) in the study for patients without event.~On-study: included progressions to AP/BC or CML-related deaths occurring in the study or during the follow-up period after discontinuation of treatment as events. The time was censored at the last assessment date in the study for patients who were still being treated and at the date of last contact for patients who discontinued treatment" (NCT01275196)
Timeframe: End of study (up to 40 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
ImatinibNA
NilotinibNA

[back to top]

Summary Statistics of Trough Imatinib and Major Metabolite CGP74588 of Imatinib and Nilotinib PK Concentration by Time Point

Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (NCT01275196)
Timeframe: 12 Months

,,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Day 8 (Cycle 1)Day 28 (Cycle 1)Day 84 (Cycle 3)Day 168 (Cycle 6)Day 336 (Cycle 12)Average trough PK
CGP74588255.4288.9235.7243.2238.7258.7
Imatinib1235.31291.31137.81078.21111.11188.7
Nilotinib1036.8970.41172.41154.81370.51137.4

[back to top]

Modified ELN2009 Criteria

"Patients satisfying criteria for several modified ELN 2009 categories are presented once under the worst category (Optimal> Suboptimal > Treatment failure). Patients in the Discontinued category are those who discontinued before the time point considered without satisfying any of the ELN 2009 criteria. Patients in the Missing category are those ongoing in the trial at the time point considered but with only missing or non evaluable data for ELN 2009 criteria." (NCT01275196)
Timeframe: End of Study (up to 40 months)

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Optimal ResponseSuboptimal ResponseTreatment FailureDiscontinued
Imatinib39.841.416.52.3
Nilotinib55.224.614.95.2

[back to top]

MMR Rate at Each Time Point

Major molecular response (MMR) was defined as a value of ≤ 0.1% of BCR-ABL ratio on the IS. The minimum number of control genes for a sample to be valid was 3000. For statistical comparison purpose, MMR was considered as a binary variable with patients achieving MMR grouped as 'responders' and patients not achieving MMR, patients with missing PCR evaluations or patients with atypical transcripts at baseline grouped as 'non-responders'. These time points including the 12 month data were calculated based on the final analysis after the end of the study. (NCT01275196)
Timeframe: Months 3,6,9,12,15, 18, 21, 24, 36

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
3 Months6 Months9 Months12 Months15 Months18 Months21 Months24 Months36 Months
Imatinib3.018.021.127.836.140.641.449.659.4
Nilotinib13.444.847.853.059.057.561.961.968.7

[back to top]

Best MMR by Each Timepoint

Best MMR rates by scheduled time point are cumulative response rates up to that time point. In this analysis, patients who had achieved MMR at or before the time point were counted as responders, no matter if they lost the response/discontinued or not. Therefore, this response rate represented the best observed response rate up to that specific time point. (NCT01275196)
Timeframe: Months 3,6,9,12,15, 18, 21, 24, 36

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
OverallMonth 3Month 6Month 9Month 12Month 15Month 18Month 21Month 24Month 36
Imatinib66.93.018.022.630.837.642.946.652.665.4
Nilotinib73.913.445.551.556.062.764.266.467.973.9

[back to top]

Durable MMR Rate at 24 Months

The rate of durable MMR at 24 months, defined as the proportion of patients who have achieved MMR at 12 months, and also maintain continuous MMR until the 24 month time point (1 month = 28 days) without intervening loss of MMR in between 12 and 24 months (NCT01275196)
Timeframe: 24 months

InterventionPerentage of Participants (Number)
Imatinib27.8
Nilotinib50.7

[back to top]

Best Complete Hematologic Response (CHR)

CHR was defined as having all of the following criteria present at any assessment, which was confirmed by another assessment at least after 4 weeks: • WBC count < 10 x 10E9 /L • Platelet count < 450 x 10E9 /L • Basophils < 5% • No blasts and promyelocytes in peripheral blood • Myelocytes + metamyelocytes < 5 % in peripheral blood • No evidence of extramedullary involvement. The assessment was not considered CHR, if there were any values indicative of CML in AP or BC (i.e. by blasts in bone marrow). For confirmation of CHR, both the initial CHR as well as the confirming assessment (at least 4 weeks after the initial assessment) had to satisfy all criteria mentioned above, without any assessment in between which indicated 'No response'. (NCT01275196)
Timeframe: Months 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9,12, 15,18, 21, 24, 30, 36

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
OverallMonth 1Month 3Month 4Month 5Month 6Month 9Month 12Month 15Month 18Month 21Month 24Month 30Month 36
Imatinib94.766.291.093.294.094.794.794.794.794.794.794.794.794.7
Nilotinib94.873.191.893.393.393.393.394.094.094.894.894.894.894.8

[back to top]

Best Complete Cytogenic Response (CCyR) Rate by Each Time Point

CCyR is defined as 0% Ph+ metaphases based on at least 20 metaphases from bone marrow cytogenetics. (NCT01275196)
Timeframe: Months 6, 12, 18, 30, 24, 36

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
OverallMonth 6Month 12Month 18Month 30Month 24Month 36
Imatinib89.557.180.584.288.086.589.5
Nilotinib85.866.477.680.684.383.685.8

[back to top]

Major Molecular Response (MMR) at 12 Months - With Imputation.

Major molecular response (MMR) was defined as a value of ≤ 0.1% of BCR-ABL ratio on the IS. The minimum number of control genes for a sample to be valid was 3000. For statistical comparison purpose, MMR was considered as a binary variable with patients achieving MMR grouped as 'responders' and patients not achieving MMR, patients with missing PCR evaluations or patients with atypical transcripts at baseline grouped as 'non-responders'. This endpoint was calculated based on the 12 month analysis. (NCT01275196)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Imatinib27.8
Nilotinib52.2

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Duration of First CCyR Among Patients Who Achieved CCyR

Duration of CCyR (months) = (date of CCyR loss or censoring-date of first CCyR + 1)/30.4375 (NCT01275196)
Timeframe: End of Study (up to 40 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
ImatinibNA
NilotinibNA

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Duration of First MMR Among Patients Who Achieved MMR

Duration of first MMR (months) = (date of loss of MMR or censoring-date of first MMR + 1)/30.4375. (NCT01275196)
Timeframe: End of Study (Up to 40 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
ImatinibNA
NilotinibNA

[back to top]

Actual Dose Intensity

Total dose/time on treatment (periods of zero dose were included). (NCT01275196)
Timeframe: End of Study (up to 40 months)

Interventionmg/day (Mean)
Imatinib416.0
Nilotinib536.4

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Event-free Survival (EFS) on Treatment

Event-free survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first occurrence of any of the following:-Death due to any cause, - Progression to AP or BC, Loss of partial cytogenetic response (PCyR), - Loss of CCyR, - Loss of CHR (NCT01275196)
Timeframe: End of Study (up to 40 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
ImatinibNA
NilotinibNA

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Overall Survival (OS) on Treatment

Patients who discontinued study treatment early or completed the study protocol and did not enter into the extension protocol were to be followed for survival every 3 months for up to 2 calendar years from the date the last patient randomized received the first dose of study drug and every 6 months until Last Patient Last Visit. Overall survival (all deaths) was defined as the time between date of randomization and date of death due to any cause at any time during the study, including the follow-up period after discontinuation of treatment, i.e. overall survival on-study. The time was censored at the date of last assessment in the study for patients who are still being treated and at the date of last contact for patients who discontinued treatment. (NCT01275196)
Timeframe: End of Study (up to 40 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
ImatinibNA
NilotinibNA

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs): Phase I & II

Assessed safety and tolerability of the combination administration of RAD001 and imatinib when given to patients with imatinib-refractory gastro-intestinal stromal tumors (GIST) by number of participants with adverse events. (NCT01275222)
Timeframe: 4 - 8 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Phase l: RAD001 20mg/Week13
Phase l: RAD001 2.5mg/Day + Glivec 600mg/Day13
Phase l: RAD001 5mg/Day + Glivec 600mg/Day5
Phase l: RAD001 2.5mg/Day + Glivec 800mg/Day11
Phase ll - Stratum l (First-line Resistant/Refractory): RAD001 2.5mg/Day + Glivec 600mg/Day27
Phase ll: Stratum ll (Post Second-line Therapy)47

[back to top]

Best Overall Response (BOR) as Assessed by Overall Response (Complete Response (CR) & Partial Response (PR)) - Phase I & II

Assessed clinical efficacy of the combination regimen in this patient population per BOR by Overall response (CR + PR). Complete response: Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial response: ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions compared to baseline (and not ≥20% increase compared to smallest sum). (NCT01275222)
Timeframe: 6 - 8 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Phase l: RAD001 20mg/Week0
Phase l: RAD001 2.5mg/Day + Glivec 600mg/Day1
Phase l: RAD001 5mg/Day + Glivec 600mg/Day0
Phase l: RAD001 2.5mg/Day + Glivec 800mg/Day0.0
Phase ll - Stratum l (First-line Resistant/Refractory): RAD001 2.5mg/Day + Glivec 600mg/Day0
Phase ll: Stratum ll (Post Second-line Therapy)1

[back to top]

Trough Concentrations for RAD001 and for Imatinib - Phase II

Assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the combination administration of RAD001 and imatinib in this patient population. (NCT01275222)
Timeframe: Part II Daily regimen: Baseline, Days 8, 15 and thereafter approximately every two months starting at month 3 whenever possible

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Week 2: RAD001Week 3: RAD001Baseline: ImatinibWeek 2: ImatinibWeek 3: ImatinibMonth 4: ImatinibMonth 6: Imatinib
Phase ll - Stratum l (First-line Resistant/Refractory): RAD001 2.5mg/Day + Glivec 600mg/Day24.30019.900472.00626.50572.00333.00181.00

[back to top]

4-Month Progression-free Survival (PFS) Rate - Phase II

Assessed clinical efficacy of the combination regimen in this patient population per Progression-free survival (PFS). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the time from date of start of treatment to the date of first documented progression or death due to any cause. Per protocol (PP) population includes patients with no known overall lesion response during 4 months +/- 2 weeks, or who later had response of CR/PR/stable disease (SD). PP population excludes patients with no known response during 4 months + / -2 weeks and no subsequent CR/PR/SD. (NCT01275222)
Timeframe: about 4 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Phase ll - Stratum l (First-line Resistant/Refractory): RAD001 2.5mg/Day + Glivec 600mg/Day17.4
Phase ll: Stratum ll (Post Second-line Therapy)37.1

[back to top]

Trough Concentrations for RAD001 and for Imatinib - Phase II

Assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the combination administration of RAD001 and imatinib in this patient population. (NCT01275222)
Timeframe: Part II Daily regimen: Baseline, Days 8, 15 and thereafter approximately every two months starting at month 3 whenever possible

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Week 2: RAD001Week 3: RAD001Week 9: RAD001Month 4: RAD001Baseline: ImatinibWeek 2: ImatinibWeek 3: ImatinibWeek 9: ImatinibMonth 4: ImatinibMonth 6: ImatinibMonth 8: ImatinibMonth 12: Imatinib
Phase ll: Stratum ll (Post Second-line Therapy)12.10012.75010.9507.840501.50540.00718.00899.0446.002040.00575.00324.00

[back to top]

All Collected Deaths

On treatment deaths were collected from FPFT up to 28 days after study drug discontinuation, for a maximum duration of 35.52 months (treatment duration ranged from 0.36 to to 35.52 months for the phase I part) and a maximum duration of 21.88 months (treatment duration of 0.16 to 21.88 months for the phase II part). Deaths post treatment survival follow up were collected after the on treatment period, up to 70 months. (NCT01275222)
Timeframe: approx. 35.52 months, approx. 70 months

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Total DeathsDeaths on-treatment
Phase l: RAD001 2.5mg/Day + Glivec 600mg/Day83
Phase l: RAD001 2.5mg/Day + Glivec 800mg/Day32
Phase l: RAD001 20mg/Week122
Phase l: RAD001 5mg/Day + Glivec 600mg/Day30
Phase ll - Stratum l (First-line Resistant/Refractory): RAD001 2.5mg/Day + Glivec 600mg/Day93
Phase ll: Stratum ll (Post Second-line Therapy)226

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) - Phase II

"Assessed clinical efficacy of the combination regimen in this patient population per Progression-free survival (PFS). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the time from date of start of treatment to the date of first documented progression or death due to any cause. If a patient had not progressed or died, progression-free survival was censored at the time of last adequate tumor assessment.~According to the study protocol no tumor assessments were performed after discontinuation of treatment with study drug. Therefore, for all patients who discontinued treatment without a documented progression but died thereafter, death was considered as PFS event only if it occurred within the regular safety follow-up of 28 days after discontinuation. Otherwise, the PFS time was censored at the last adequate tumor assessment." (NCT01275222)
Timeframe: about 60 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase ll - Stratum l (First-line Resistant/Refractory): RAD001 2.5mg/Day + Glivec 600mg/Day1.9
Phase ll: Stratum ll (Post Second-line Therapy)3.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) - Phase I & II

Assessed clinical efficacy of the combination regimen in this patient population per Overall Survival (OS). Overall survival was defined as the time from date of start of treatment to date of death due to any cause. For patients still receiving study medication at the time of the analysis, survival was censored at the date of last examination. If a patient was not known to have died but was no longer continuing with study medication, survival was censored at the date of last contact. (NCT01275222)
Timeframe: about 60 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase l: RAD001 20mg/Week9.4
Phase l: RAD001 5mg/Day + Glivec 600mg/Day10.9
Phase l: RAD001 2.5mg/Day + Glivec 600mg/Day18.7
Phase l: RAD001 2.5mg/Day + Glivec 800mg/DayNA
Phase ll - Stratum l (First-line Resistant/Refractory): RAD001 2.5mg/Day + Glivec 600mg/Day14.9
Phase ll: Stratum ll (Post Second-line Therapy)10.7

[back to top]

Response Rate (CR + PR) Assessed by RECIST 1.1 (Phase II)

(NCT01281865)
Timeframe: At 8 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Progression of DiseaseStable Disease
Arm 1-Treatment (Everolimus and Imatinib Mesylate)45
Arm 2-Treatment (Everolimus and Imatinib Mesylate)10

[back to top]

Percentage of CD27+ B Cells in Responders (SCR) and Non-responders

%CD27+ B cells (NCT01309997)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of CD27+ B cells (Mean)
Rituximab Responders10
Rituximab Non-responders4.3
Imatinib Responders14.2
Imatinib Nonresponders17.1

[back to top]

Significant Clinical Response

Assessed by decline in an affected area's skin score as measured with the Vienna Skin Scale (from 4 [worst] to 2, 3 to 1, or 2 to 0 [best]) without a concurrent increase of two or more points in another area OR by an increase in the range of motion of the shoulders, elbows or wrists by two points (in a 1-7 scale where 1 is worst and 7 is best) or of the ankles by one point (in a 1 to 4 scale where 1 is worst and 4 is best) without a concurrent worsening in another area. (NCT01309997)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm I (Enzyme Inhibitor)9
Arm II (Monoclonal Antibody)10

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of Treatment Failure

Defined as discontinuation of randomized treatment due to chronic GVHD progression or treatment intolerance or no significant clinical response in sclerosis. (NCT01309997)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm I (Enzyme Inhibitor)24
Arm II (Monoclonal Antibody)26

[back to top]

Number of Patients Achieving Improvement in Cutaneous Sclerosis

Assessed by decrease of >= 0.2 units (where 0 is best and 3.0 is worst ) in the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ). (NCT01309997)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm 1 (Enzyme Inhibitor)2
Arm II (Monocolonal Antibody)9

[back to top]

Patients Who Were Able to Taper Corticosteroids

Patients who achieved a greater than or equal to 50% reduction in the daily corticosteroid dose at 6mo compared to baseline (NCT01309997)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm I (Enzyme Inhibitor)7
Arm II (Monoclonal Antibody)9

[back to top]

Baseline Histopathologic Score in the Two Treatment Arms

"Instrument: Nash dermal fibrosis grade. Measures extent of sclerosis in skin biopsies by histologic examination. Scale ranges from grade 0-5. Nash grade 5 is most severe fibrosis (0 is better outcome, 5 is worse outcome). No subscales are used in Nash grade. Please see table 1 in the reference for grading of dermal fibrosis.~Nash RA, McSweeney PA, Crofford LJ, Abidi M, Chen CS, Godwin JD, et al. High-dose immunosuppressive therapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for severe systemic sclerosis: long-term follow-up of the US multicenter pilot study. Blood 2007;110:1388-96." (NCT01309997)
Timeframe: Enrollment

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Arm 1 (Enzyme Inhibitor)2
Arm II (Monoclonal Antibody)2

[back to top]

Patients With Any Percentage Decline in Any Grade of Sclerosis Without Increase in Percentage of Higher Grades of Sclerosis in Other Areas on the Vienna Skin Scale

Maximum of 10 body areas. Each area can be graded 0 (best) to 4 (worst). Each of those grades requires a percentage of involvement. Improvement is measured by reduction of involvement in any grade and any body area. (NCT01309997)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm I (Enzyme Inhibitor)14
Arm II (Monoclonal Antibody)9

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Who Achieved Complete Remission of Their Disease

Complete Remission (CR): A CR requires that the following be recorded concurrently: an absolute neutrophil count (segs and bands) > 1000/μL, no circulating blasts, platelets > 100,000/μL; adequate bone marrow cellularity with trilineage hematopoiesis, and < 5% marrow leukemia blast cells. All previous extramedullary manifestations of disease must be absent. If patients continue on with treatment, there can be no evidence of recurrence of ALL for at least 4 weeks. (NCT01312818)
Timeframe: Day 30

Interventionparticipants (Number)
ALL Treated Patients0

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Patients With Complete Remission at One Year

The complete remission (CR) is the total number of patients who are in CR at one year divided by the total number of patients who received at least one dose of HCVAD with liposomal vincristine. CR was defined as the presence of 1x10^9/L neutrophils, >100x10^9/L platelets in the perpherial blood, and no extramedullary disease. (NCT01319981)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Hyper-CMAD + Rituximab12
Hyper-CMAD13

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Time from date of treatment start until date of death due to any cause or last Follow-up. Survival will be measured by the estimated median survival computed by Kaplan-Meier (K-M) analysis, which is the time point at which the cumulative survival drops below 50%, if present. If not present then the median Overall Survival is not reached and not available (NA) as there are an insufficient number of participants with events. In either case ranges are provided for observed survival intervals used in the K-M analysis. (NCT01319981)
Timeframe: Up to 7 years, 8 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Hyper-CMAD + RituximabNA
Hyper-CMADNA

[back to top]

Complete Response Duration

The complete remission (CR) is the total number of patients who are in CR at one year divided by the total number of patients who received at least one dose of HCVAD with liposomal vincristine. CR was defined as the presence of 1x10^9/L neutrophils, >100x10^9/L platelets in the perpherial blood, and no extramedullary disease. Response date to loss of response or last follow up. Remission duration will be measured by the estimated median remission duration computed by Kaplan-Meier (K-M) analysis, which is the time point at which the cumulative remission duration drops below 50%, if present. If not present then median remission duration is not reached and not available (NA) as there are an insufficient number of participants with events. In either case ranges are provided for observed survival intervals used in the K-M analysis.. (NCT01319981)
Timeframe: Up to 7 years, 8 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Hyper-CMAD + RituximabNA
Hyper-CMADNA

[back to top]

Geometric Mean Ratio of Dose Normalized AUCtau for Sildenafil Before and After Imatinib Administrations

"AUCtau was the area under the curve calculated to the end of the dosing interval, tau. The effect of co-administration of imatinib at two doses (200 and 400 mg) on the pharmacokinetics of sildenafil was performed on dose normalized AUCtau of sildenafil. A mixed effects linear model was fitted to the log-transformed PK parameters. This model included treatment (i.e., dose of imatinib) as a fixed effect, and participant as a random effect. Estimates for the treatment differences and associated 90% confidence intervals were obtained from the above model. These estimates and confidence intervals were then back-transformed to the original scale, giving, for each dose level of imatinib, the ratio of imatinib + co-administered sildenafil and bosentan (test) relative to the co-administered drugs alone (sildenafil + bosentan) (reference)." (NCT01392469)
Timeframe: Day 1: pre-dose, Day 8: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hours post-dose, Day 9: pre-dose, Days 22 and 36: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hours post-dose

Interventionhr*ng/mL/mg (Geometric Mean)
Bosentan + Sildenafil (Reference)7.22
Imatinib (200 mg/Day) + Bosentan + Sildenafil (Test 1)9.82
Imatinib (400 mg/Day) + Bosentan + Sildenafil (Test 2)12.3

[back to top]

Geometric Mean Ratio of Dose Normalized Cmax for Sildenafil Before and After Imatinib Administrations

"Cmax was the maximum (peak) observed plasma, blood, serum, or other body fluid drug concentration after dose administration. The effect of co-administration of imatinib at two doses (200 and 400 mg) on the pharmacokinetics of sildenafil was performed on dose normalized Cmax of sildenafil. A mixed effects linear model was fitted to the log-transformed PK parameters. This model included treatment (i.e., dose of imatinib) as a fixed effect, and participant as a random effect. Estimates for the treatment differences and associated 90% confidence intervals were obtained from the above model. These estimates and confidence intervals was then back-transformed to the original scale, giving, for each dose level of imatinib, the ratio of imatinib + co-administered sildenafil and bosentan (test) relative to the co-administered drugs alone (sildenafil + bosentan) (reference)." (NCT01392469)
Timeframe: Day 1: pre-dose, Day 8: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hours post-dose, Day 9: pre-dose, Days 22 and 36: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hours post-dose

Interventionng/mL/mg (Geometric Mean)
Bosentan + Sildenafil (Reference)2.44
Imatinib (200 mg/Day) + Bosentan + Sildenafil (Test 1)3.14
Imatinib (400 mg/Day) + Bosentan + Sildenafil (Test 2)3.81

[back to top]

Geometric Mean Ratio of Dose Normalized Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Bosentan Before and After Imatinib Administrations

"Cmax was the maximum (peak) observed plasma, blood, serum, or other body fluid drug concentration after dose administration. The effect of co-administration of imatinib at two doses (200 and 400 mg) on the pharmacokinetics of bosentan was performed on dose normalized Cmax of bosentan. A mixed effects linear model was fitted to the log-transformed PK parameters. This model included treatment (i.e., dose of imatinib) as a fixed effect, and participant as a random effect. Estimates for the treatment differences and associated 90% confidence intervals were obtained from the above model. These estimates and confidence intervals were then back-transformed to the original scale, giving, for each dose level of imatinib, the ratio of imatinib + co-administered sildenafil and bosentan (test) relative to the co-administered drugs alone (sildenafil + bosentan) (reference)." (NCT01392469)
Timeframe: Day 1: pre-dose, Day 8: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hours post-dose, Day 9: pre-dose, Days 22 and 36: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hours post-dose

Interventionng/mL/mg (Geometric Mean)
Bosentan + Sildenafil (Reference)21.9
Imatinib (200 mg/Day) + Bosentan + Sildenafil (Test 1)21.8
Imatinib (400 mg/Day) + Bosentan + Sildenafil (Test 2)23.4

[back to top]

Dose Normalized AUCtau of Imatinib and CGP74588 (Active Metabolite of Imatinib)

(NCT01392469)
Timeframe: Day 1: pre-dose, Day 8: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hours post-dose, Day 9: pre-dose, Days 22 and 36: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hours post-dose

,
Interventionhr*ng/mL/mg (Mean)
Imatinib AUCtau/DoseCGP74588 AUCtau/Dose
Imatinib (200 mg/Day) + Bosentan + Sildenafil90.919.3
Imatinib (400 mg/Day) + Bosentan + Sildenafil88.420.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With At Least One or More Adverse Events (AEs)

An adverse event was the appearance or worsening of any undesirable sign, symptom, or medical condition that occurred after starting the study drug even if the event was not considered to be related to study drug. Number of participants with AEs were reported by treatment period. (NCT01392469)
Timeframe: From time of first administration of study drug until end of study (up to approximately 18 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bosentan + Sildenafil10
Imatinib (200 mg/Day) + Bosentan + Sildenafil9
Imatinib (400 mg/Day) + Bosentan+ Sildenafil16

[back to top]

Dose Normalized Cmax of Imatinib and CGP74588 (Active Metabolite of Imatinib)

(NCT01392469)
Timeframe: Day 1: pre-dose, Day 8: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hours post-dose, Day 9: pre-dose, Days 22 and 36: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hours post-dose

,
Interventionng/ml/mg (Mean)
Imatinib Cmax/DoseCGP74588 Cmax/Dose
Imatinib (200 mg/Day) + Bosentan + Sildenafil7.551.37
Imatinib (400 mg/Day) + Bosentan + Sildenafil6.711.39

[back to top]

Geometric Mean Ratio of Dose Normalized Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Tau (AUCtau) for Bosentan Before and After Imatinib Administrations

"AUCtau was the area under the curve calculated to the end of the dosing interval, tau. The effect of co-administration of imatinib at two doses (200 and 400 mg) on the pharmacokinetics of bosentan was performed on dose normalized AUCtau of bosentan. A mixed effects linear model was fitted to the log-transformed PK parameters. This model included treatment (i.e., dose of imatinib) as a fixed effect, and participant as a random effect. Estimates for the treatment differences and associated 90% confidence intervals were obtained from the above model. These estimates and confidence intervals were then back-transformed to the original scale, giving, for each dose level of imatinib, the ratio of imatinib + co-administered sildenafil and bosentan (test) relative to the co-administered drugs alone (sildenafil + bosentan) (reference)." (NCT01392469)
Timeframe: Day 1: pre-dose, Day 8: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hours post-dose, Day 9: pre-dose, Days 22 and 36: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hours post-dose

Interventionhr*ng/mL/mg (Geometric Mean)
Bosentan + Sildenafil (Reference)93.3
Imatinib (200 mg/Day) + Bosentan + Sildenafil (Test 1)109
Imatinib (400 mg/Day) + Bosentan + Sildenafil (Test 2)131

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Deaths

Adverse event monitoring was conducted throughout the trial. (NCT01392495)
Timeframe: 144 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Adverse Events (serious and non-serious)Serious Adverse EventsDeaths
QTI571 200 mg442
QTI571 400 mg1351

[back to top]

Time to Molecular Response (MR)^4.5

"Time to Molecular Response (MR)^4.5 is the time between randomization date and first date that MMR (or MR4.5) criteria are satisfied. Participants who do not achieve MMR (or MR4.5) will be censored.~MR4.5 is defined as a 4.5-log reduction in BCR-ABL transcript from the standardized baseline (0.0032% IS, either detectable disease <= 0.0032% BCR-ABL (IS) or undetectable disease in cDNA (in same volume used for BCR-ABL) with >= 32,000 ABL transcripts." (NCT01593254)
Timeframe: From randomization to study completion. Approximately 115 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm 1: Imatinib (≥400 mg)67.7
Arm 2: Dasatinib (100 mg)74.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS is the time from randomization date to death date. Participants who have not died will be censored on the last date they are known to be alive. (NCT01593254)
Timeframe: From randomization to study completion. Approximately 115 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm 1: Imatinib (≥400 mg)NA
Arm 2: Dasatinib (100 mg)NA

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving Major Molecular Response (MMR) After 12 Months of CML Treatment

"Major Molecular Response, is defined as a 3-log reduction in BCR-ABL transcripts from the standardized baseline, which represents 100% on the international scale, so a 3-log reduction is fixed at 0.1% for MMR; N/A = not applicable. 95% CI is Clopper-Pearson(Exact) two-sided 95% confidence intervals.~P-value is based on Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test stratified by Sokal score(high, intermediate, low, and unknown) and time between 3 month molecular analysis and randomization (<=4 weeks vs >4 weeks)." (NCT01593254)
Timeframe: At 12 months after Day 1 initiation of 1st line treatment with imatinib or imatinib at any dose, after less than optimal response to first-line imatinib.

InterventionPercentage of Patients (Number)
Arm 1: Imatinib (≥400 mg)12.8
Arm 2: Dasatinib (100 mg)28.7

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

"PFS is the time from randomization date to progression date or death date, whichever occurs first. Participants who neither progress nor die will be censored.~Progression is defined as the following, meeting the criteria for accelerated or blast crisis CML are met at any time or death from any cause during treatment.~Accelerated phase of CML:~The presence of ≥15%, but < 30% blasts in the blood or bone marrow~At least 30% blasts plus promyelocytes in the blood or bone marrow~At least 20% peripheral basophils~Thrombocytopenia (fewer than 100,000 platelets/mm3) unrelated to treatment.~Blast phase of CML~At least 30% blasts in the blood or bone marrow~Extramedullary involvement (e.g., chloromas), but not hepatosplenomegaly" (NCT01593254)
Timeframe: From randomization to study completion. Approximately 115 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm 1: Imatinib (≥400 mg)NA
Arm 2: Dasatinib (100 mg)NA

[back to top]

Median Time to Major Molecular Response (MMR)

"Median Time to Major Molecular Response (MMR) is the time between randomization date and first date that MMR (or MR4.5) criteria are satisfied. Participants who do not achieve MMR (or MR4.5) will be censored.~Major Molecular Response, is defined as a 3-log reduction in BCR-ABL transcripts from the standardized baseline, which represents 100% on the international scale, so a 3-log reduction is fixed at 0.1% for MMR." (NCT01593254)
Timeframe: From randomization to study completion. Approximately 115 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm 1: Imatinib (≥400 mg)19.7
Arm 2: Dasatinib (100 mg)13.9

[back to top]

Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) Rate

The percentage of Ph+ metaphases in bone marrow (peripheral blood may not be used), with a review of a minimum of 20 metaphases. Responses are defined as follows: Complete (CCyR): 0% Ph+ metaphases. (NCT01650805)
Timeframe: 12 months after first dose

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Ponatinib5
Imatinib6

[back to top]

Major Molecular Response (MMR) Rate at 12 Months

A ratio of reverse transcribed transcript of BCR-ABL to ABL ≤ 0.1% on the international scale, measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. (NCT01650805)
Timeframe: 12 months after first dose

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Ponatinib8
Imatinib5

[back to top]

<10% BCR-ABL^IS Rate

To compare the proportion of patients achieving a ratio of <10% BCR-ABL to ABL transcript levels at 3 months, as measured by the international scale (<10% BCR-ABL^IS), in patients administered ponatinib versus those administered imatinib (NCT01650805)
Timeframe: 3 months after first dose

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Ponatinib103
Imatinib77

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Tumor Volume at 6 Months

Volumetric measures were performed using MRI scan analysis. Response criteria include greater than 20 percent decrease in tumor volume as responsive. Greater than 20 percent increase in tumor volume as tumor progression. Less then 20 percent increase or decrease in tumor volume is stable disease (NCT01673009)
Timeframe: baseline to 6 months

Interventionpercentage change of tumor volume (Median)
Administration of Gleevec17

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c Levels Over Time

Change in HbA1c levels from Week 52 to Week 104 (NCT01781975)
Timeframe: Visit 9 (Week 52) and Visit 13 (Week 104)

,
Interventionpercentage of HbA1c level (Mean)
Week 52Week 104
Imatinib Mesylate6.336.44
Placebo6.517.03

[back to top]

Number of Severe Hypoglycemic Events

Major hypoglycemic events occurring from randomization at weeks 0, 52 and 104. (NCT01781975)
Timeframe: Visit 0 (Week 0), Visit 9 (Week 52), and Visit 13 (Week 104)

Interventionevents (Number)
Imatinib Mesylate2
Placebo3

[back to top]

Number of Adverse Events

Number of adverse events that were reported throughout the study. (NCT01781975)
Timeframe: Adverse Events will be assessed at Visit 0 (week 0), Visit 1 (Week 2), Visit 2 (Week 4), and every month thereafter.

Interventionevents (Number)
Imatinib Mesylate172
Placebo28

[back to top]

Area Under the Stimulated C-peptide Curve (AUC) Mean Over the First 2 Hours of a 4 Hour Mixed Meal Tolerance Test at the 1 Year Visit

"The primary outcome of each participant is the area under the stimulated c-peptide curve (AUC) mean based on data collected at time 0 to 2 hours of a 4-hour mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT) conducted at the primary endpoint visit. The timed measurements are done at: 0, 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes. The term AUC mean comes from the mean value theorem in calculus. It is the value on the scale of the y-axis that is equal to the AUC divided by the range on the x-axis (in this case 120 minutes)." (NCT01781975)
Timeframe: Visit 9 (Week 52) at 0, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120 minutes post-dose

Interventionnmol/L (Mean)
Imatinib Mesylate0.834
Placebo0.775

[back to top]

Area Under the Stimulated C-peptide Curve (AUC) Mean Over 4 Hours at 24 Months

Area under the MMTT-stimulated peak, 4 hour C-peptide AUC mean at week 104. The units are reported as nano-moles/Liter because this is AUC mean (the AUC is divided by the time internal so that the units return to the c-peptide units of measure). (NCT01781975)
Timeframe: Visit 13 (Week 104)

Interventionnmol/L (Mean)
Imatinib Mesylate0.472
Placebo0.389

[back to top]

Change in Insulin Dose (Units/kg) Over Time

Assess insulin use in units per kilogram body weight per day at weeks 52 and 104. (NCT01781975)
Timeframe: Visit 9 (Week 52) and Visit 13 (Week 104)

,
InterventionUnits per Kg (Mean)
Week 52Week 104
Imatinib Mesylate0.3070.389
Placebo0.4130.488

[back to top]

Area Under Curve (AUC) Time Frame: Predose, 0.5,1,1.5,2,3,5,8,12,24,48,72hours Post-dose

(NCT01795716)
Timeframe: predose, 0.5,1,1.5,2,3,5,8,12,24,48,72hours post-dose

Interventionmcg*hr/mL (Mean)
Mesylate Imatinib Capsule37256
Glivec37206

[back to top]

Rate of BCR-ABL Undetectable

The BCR-ABL transcript rate was analysed by molecular biology by RQ-PCR at study entry, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months. (NCT01827930)
Timeframe: 12 first months

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Imatinib 600 (Randomized Trial)29.2
Imatinib 400 (Randomized Trial)12.0
Imatinib400 (Parallel Cohort)5.3

[back to top]

Time to the First BCR-ABL Undetectable

"The BCR-ABL transcript rate was analysed by molecular biology by RQ-PCR at study entry, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months.~Time to the first BCR-ABL undetectable was defined by the time from inclusion/randomization and the first CMR." (NCT01827930)
Timeframe: within 12 months following randomization

InterventionMonths (Median)
Imatinib 600 (Randomized Trial)8.7
Imatinib 400 (Randomized Trial)3.2
Imatinib400 (Parallel Cohort)8.9

[back to top]

Molecular Response at 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months

"The molecular response is defined by the measurement of BCR-ABL transcript rate by quantitative RT-PCR (RQ-PCR) on peripheral venous blood according to international standards.~It is defined as:~Major Molecular Response (MMR): BRC-ABL transcript rate ≤ 0.1%~Complete Molecular Response (CMR): transcript BCR-ABL undetectable and non quantifiable." (NCT01827930)
Timeframe: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months

,,
Interventionpercentage of patient (Number)
3 months - CMR3 months : MMR6 months : CMR6 months : MMR9 months : CMR9 months : MMR12 months : CMR12 months : MMR
Imatinib 400 (Randomized Trial)8.080.08.072.04.068.04.076.0
Imatinib 600 (Randomized Trial)12.575.04.287.520.866.78.383.3
Imatinib400 (Parallel Cohort)078.9073.75.368.45.363.2

[back to top]

Rate of Decline of 2-log of the BCR-ABL Transcript Rate at 3 ,6, 9 and 12 Months From Baseline - Randomised Study

"The BCR-ABL transcript rate was analysed by molecular biology by RQ-PCR at study entry, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months.~Efficacy was also evaluated at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months in terms of decreasing the rate of BCR-ABL transcripts of 2 logarithms, relative to the initial value (inclusion). The lack of data on the transcript rate was considered as failure (no decrease)." (NCT01827930)
Timeframe: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months

,,
Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
3 months6 months9 months12 months
Imatinib 400 (Randomized Trial)0000
Imatinib 600 (Randomized Trial)4.24.204.2
Imatinib400 (Parallel Cohort)0000

[back to top]

Time to Complete Molecular Response (CMR) and Major Molecular Response (MMR)

Time to complete molecular response was defined by the time from inclusion/randomization and the first CMR. (NCT01827930)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of complete molecular response (up to 12 months)

,,
Interventionmonths (Median)
CMRMMR
Imatinib 400 (Randomized Trial)3.23.2
Imatinib 600 (Randomized Trial)8.73.2
Imatinib400 (Parallel Cohort)8.93.4

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined by the time from de date of inclusion/randomization to the date of death (of any cause). (NCT01827930)
Timeframe: First 12 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Imatinib 600 (Randomized Trial)NA
Imatinib 400 (Randomized Trial)NA
Imatinib400 (Parallel Cohort)NA

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Presenting a Decline of the BCR-ABL Transcript Rate at 12 Months From Baseline - Randomised Study

"The BCR-ABL transcript rate was analysed by molecular biology by RQ-PCR at study entry, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months.~Treatment is considered effective at 12 months if:~for patients with an inclusion transcript rate less than 0.1%: the transcript rate at 12 months is less or equal to 0.001% or undetectable.~for patients with an inclusion transcript rate greater than 0.1% : the transcript rate at 12 months is less or equal to 0.1% or undetectable.~If BCR-ABL transcript level was unavailable at M12, the treatment was considered ineffective." (NCT01827930)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Imatinib 600 (Randomized Trial)29.2
Imatinib 400 (Randomized Trial)32.0
Imatinib400 (Parallel Cohort)10.5

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

"Progression-free survival was defined by the time from the date of inclusion and the date of progression.~Progression was defined as :~Death,~Passage into the acceleration phase defined by one of the following criteria: % of blood or medullary blasts greater than 15% but less than 30%, blasts plus promyelocytes greater than 30% in the blood or marrow, basophils greater than 20% in the blood, thrombocytopenia less than 100x10^9/L unrelated to treatment, clonal evolution)~Passage to the blast transformation phase defined by one of the following criteria: % of blasts of blood or bone marrow greater than 30%, occurrence of extramedullary damage other than histologically proven hepato-splenic.~Increase in BCR-ABL transcripts greater than or equal to 2-log compared to the previous values (this increase must be confirmed within 3 months)." (NCT01827930)
Timeframe: First 12 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Imatinib 600 (Randomized Trial)NA
Imatinib 400 (Randomized Trial)NA
Imatinib400 (Parallel Cohort)NA

[back to top]

Phase 1 - Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of STI571

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of STI571, docetaxel, and cisplatin, when administered in combination for the treatment of patients with chemo-naïve recurrent and metastatic (stage IV) NSCLC. (NCT02127372)
Timeframe: After cycle 1, day 22

Interventionmg (Number)
Phase 1400

[back to top]

Phase II - Radiographic Response

"The percentage of patients with a complete or partial response.~Responses for the Phase II portion of the trial will be by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria as follows:~Complete Response (CR): disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR): at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD." (NCT02127372)
Timeframe: After Cycle 6, approximately 18 weeks.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 225

[back to top]

Phase 1 - Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Docetaxel and Cisplatin

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of STI571, docetaxel, and cisplatin when administered in combination for the treatment of patients with chemo-naïve recurrent and metastatic (stage IV) NSCLC. (NCT02127372)
Timeframe: After cycle 1, day 22

Interventionmg/m2 (Number)
DocetaxelCisplatin
Phase 16060

[back to top]

Phase 2: 1 Year Survival

Phase II: Percentage of patients alive 1 year from the start of protocol treatment. (NCT02127372)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 261

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Retaining Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) at Month 48

The Kaplan-Meier curve was generated based on the first date of CCyR until the date of the confirmed loss of CCyR or censoring, objectively documented, for responders only. Confirmed loss of CCyR was the presence of at least one Ph+ metaphase confirmed by a second assessment at least 28 days later. Treatment discontinuation due to suboptimal response/treatment failure, PD or death due to PD within 28 days of last dose were considered confirmed loss of CCyR. PD was defined as disease progression to AP or BP CML. (NCT02130557)
Timeframe: Month 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bosutinib97.4
Imatinib93.7

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of Event Free Survival (EFS) Events

EFS was defined as time from randomization to death due to any cause, transformation to AP or BP at any time, confirmed loss of complete hematologic response (CHR), confirmed loss of CCyR or censoring. Loss of CHR was defined as a hematologic assessment of non-CHR (chronic phase, AP, or BP) confirmed by 2 assessments at least 4 weeks apart. Loss of CHR was defined as appearance of any of the following: WBC count that rises to >20.0*10^9/L, platelet count rises to >=600*10^9/L, appearance of palpable spleen or other extramedullary involvement proven by biopsy, appearance of 5% myelocytes in peripheral blood, appearance of blasts or promyelocytes in peripheral blood. Loss of CCyR was defined as at least 1 Ph+ metaphase from analysis of <100 metaphases confirmed by follow up cytogenetic analysis after 1 month. Cumulative incidence of EFS was defined as percentage of participants with EFS event at Month 60 and was adjusted for competing risk of treatment discontinuation without event. (NCT02130557)
Timeframe: Up to Month 60

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bosutinib6.9
Imatinib10.4

[back to top]

Summary of Trough Plasma Concentration by Presence of Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) of Bosutinib

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. AE was assessed according to maximum severity grading based on NCI CTCAE version 4.0. Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; within normal limits, Grade 3= severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling; urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5= death. Trough plasma concentration of participants who had grade 3 or higher AE are presented in this outcome measure. Data of plasma concentration is reported separately for each preferred term of AE. (NCT02130557)
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Days 28, 56 and 84

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Day 28: DiarrheaDay 28: ThrombocytopeniaDay 28: RashDay 28: VomitingDay 56: DiarrheaDay 56: ThrombocytopeniaDay 56: RashDay 56: VomitingDay 84: DiarrheaDay 84: ThrombocytopeniaDay 84: RashDay 84: Vomiting
Bosutinib87.76949.22071.15014.66368.51356.85358.92538.20076.78267.62383.96712.400

[back to top]

Summary of Trough Plasma Concentration by Presence of Grade 1 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) of Bosutinib

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. AE was assessed according to maximum severity grading based on National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; within normal limits, Grade 3= severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling; urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5= death. Trough plasma concentration of participants who had grade 1 or higher AE are presented in this outcome measure. Data of plasma concentration is reported separately for each preferred term of AE. (NCT02130557)
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Days 28, 56 and 84

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Day 28: DiarrheaDay 28: ThrombocytopeniaDay 28: RashDay 28: NauseaDay 28: VomitingDay 56: DiarrheaDay 56: ThrombocytopeniaDay 56: RashDay 56: NauseaDay 56: VomitingDay 84: DiarrheaDay 84: ThrombocytopeniaDay 84: RashDay 84: NauseaDay 84: Vomiting
Bosutinib69.40263.52974.77966.01171.68468.83465.32770.01661.62665.98081.26971.58589.08077.70286.949

[back to top]

Summary of Trough Plasma Concentration by Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) of Bosutinib

CCyR was based on the prevalence of Ph+ metaphases among cells in metaphase on a BM aspirate. CCyR was achieved when there was 0% Ph+ metaphases among cells in a BM sample when at least 20 metaphases from a BM sample were analyzed, or MMR if no BM was available. Trough plasma concentration of participants who had CCyR are presented in this outcome measure. (NCT02130557)
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Days 28, 56 and 84

Interventionnanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean)
Day 28Day 56Day 84
Bosutinib71.28273.06983.973

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (NCI CTCAE) (Version 4.0)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. AE was assessed according to severity grading based on NCI CTCAE version 4.0. Grade 1 =mild; Grade 2 =moderate; Grade 3 =severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; Grade 4 =life-threatening or disabling, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5 =death. Treatment-emergent events were events between first dose of study drug and up to 60 months that were absent before treatment that worsened relative to pretreatment state. If the same participant in a given treatment had more than 1 adverse event, only the maximum CTCAE was reported. (NCT02130557)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of treatment (up to Month 60)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5
Bosutinib761144503
Imatinib2486120284

[back to top]

Summary of Trough Plasma Concentration by Major Molecular Response (MMR) of Bosutinib

MMR was defined as a ratio of BCR-ABL/ABL <=0.1% on the international scale (>=3 log reduction from standardized baseline in ratio of BCR-ABL to ABL transcripts) by quantitative RT-qPCR. Trough plasma concentration of participants who had MMR are presented in this outcome measure. (NCT02130557)
Timeframe: Pre-dose on Days 28, 56 and 84

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Day 28Day 56Day 84
Bosutinib75.05078.43791.081

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (NCI CTCAE) Version 4.03

Laboratory parameters included hematological (haemoglobin, lymphocytes [absolute], neutrophils [absolute], platelets and leukocytes) and biochemistry (albumin, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, amylase, bilirubin, creatinine kinase, calcium, creatinine, glucose, potassium, lipase, magnesium, phosphate, sodium, urate) parameters. Abnormalities in laboratory tests were graded by NCI CTCAE version 4.03 as Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe and Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling. The number of participants with laboratory test abnormalities were reported. (NCT02130557)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of treatment (up to Month 60)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4
Bosutinib66713361
Imatinib75915445

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) Up to Month 18

MMR was defined as a ratio of BCR-ABL/ABL <=0.1% on the international scale (>=3 log reduction from standardized baseline in ratio of BCR-ABL to ABL transcripts [>=3000 ABL required]) by quantitative RT-qPCR. The percentage of participants with MMR for up to Month 18 are reported. (NCT02130557)
Timeframe: Up to Month 18

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bosutinib61.0
Imatinib52.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) at Month 12

MMR was defined as a ratio of breakpoint cluster region to abelson (BCR-ABL/ABL) less than or equal to (<=) 0.1 percent (%) on the international scale (IS) (greater than or equal to [>=] 3 log reduction from standardized baseline in ratio of BCR-ABL to ABL transcripts [>=3000 ABL required]) by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). The percentage of participants with MMR at Month 12 are reported. (NCT02130557)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bosutinib47.2
Imatinib36.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) Up to Month 12

Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) was based on the prevalence of Ph+ metaphases among cells in metaphase on a bone marrow (BM) aspirate. CCyR was achieved when there was 0% Ph+ metaphases among cells in a BM sample when at least 20 metaphases from a BM sample were analyzed, or MMR if no BM was available. The percentage of participants with CCyR for up to Month 12 are reported. (NCT02130557)
Timeframe: Up to Month 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bosutinib77.2
Imatinib66.4

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) Rate

OS was defined as the time (in months) from randomization to the occurrence of death due to any cause or censoring. Kaplan-meier analysis was used for determination of OS. Percentage of participants who were alive were estimated in this outcome measure. (NCT02130557)
Timeframe: Up to Month 60

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bosutinib94.9
Imatinib94.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities

Criteria for vital signs abnormalities: systolic blood pressure <80 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), >210 mmHg; diastolic blood pressure <40 mmHg, >130 mmHg; heart rate <40 beats per minute (bpm), >150 bpm; temperature <32 degree celsius, >40 degree celsius; weight >=10% increase from baseline, >=10% decrease from baseline. The number of participants with any vital sign abnormalities during On-treatment period are reported. On-Treatment was defined as values collected after the date of the first dose of test article until the last date of test article +28 days. (NCT02130557)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of treatment (up to Month 60)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bosutinib107
Imatinib109

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities

Criteria for ECG abnormalities included heart rate: increase of >15 bpm from baseline value and >=120 bpm, decrease of >15 bpm from baseline value and <=45 bpm; PR interval: change of >=20 msec from baseline value and >=220 milliseconds (msec); QRS interval >=120 msec; QTcB interval >500 msec, increase of >60 msec from baseline; >450 msec (Men) or >470 msec (Women). QT interval using Fridericia's correction (QTcF) >500 msec, increase of >60 msec from baseline, >450 msec (Men) or >470 msec (Women). The number of participants with ECG abnormalities during On-treatment period are reported. On-Treatment was defined as values collected after the date of the first dose of test article up until the last date of test article +28 days. (NCT02130557)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of treatment (up to Month 60)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bosutinib16
Imatinib13

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. (NCT02130557)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of treatment (up to Month 60)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bosutinib68
Imatinib38

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Retaining Major Molecular Response (MMR) at Month 48

The Kaplan-Meier curve was generated based on the first date of MMR until the date of the confirmed loss of MMR or censoring, objectively documented, for responders only. Confirmed loss of MMR was BCR-ABL/ABL IS ratio >0.1% in association with a >=5-fold increase in BCR-ABL/ABL IS ratio from the lowest value achieved up to that time-point confirmed by a second assessment at least 28 days later. Treatment discontinuation due to suboptimal response/treatment failure, progressive disease (PD) or death due to PD within 28 days of last dose were considered confirmed loss of MMR. PD was defined as disease progression to accelerated phase (AP) or blast phase (BP) CML. (NCT02130557)
Timeframe: Month 48

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bosutinib92.2
Imatinib92.0

[back to top]

Phase Ib Study: Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities

The phase Ib will be pursued in standard 3+3 format, based on toxicities encountered during the first cycle of therapy. (NCT02257541)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 1b, Dose Level -13
Phase 1b, Dose Level 18
Phase 1b, Dose Level 21
Phase 1b, Dose Level -23

[back to top]

Phase Ib Portion: Response Rate (RR)

"(CR+PR, RECIST 1.1) and by CHOI criteria~PHASE 1b PARTICIPANTS ONLY~Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR" (NCT02257541)
Timeframe: 32 weeks

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Partial Response/PRStable Disease/SDProgressive Disease/PDNot reported due to withdrawn from study
Phase 1b, Dose Level -11200
Phase 1b, Dose Level -20030
Phase 1b, Dose Level 10332
Phase 1b, Dose Level 20010

[back to top]

Phase Ib Study: Response Rate (RR)

"defined by RECIST 1.1 criteria and by CHOI criteria,and by EORTC criteria~PHASE 1b PARTICIPANTS ONLY~Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR" (NCT02257541)
Timeframe: 32 weeks

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Progressive Disease/PDStable Disease/SDNot reported due to withdrawn from study
Phase 1b, Dose Level -1120
Phase 1b, Dose Level -2300
Phase 1b, Dose Level 1242
Phase 1b, Dose Level 2010

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Number of Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Who Develop Molecular Recurrence After Discontinuing TKIs.

The number of patients who develop molecular recurrence after discontinuing TKIs. This will be reported as the number of new occurrences from the end of the prior time frame. (NCT02269267)
Timeframe: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Less or equal to one monthOne month to two monthsTwo months to three monthsThree months to four monthsFour months to five monthsFive months to six monthsSix months to eight monthsEight months to 10 monthsTen months to 12 months12 months to 14 months14 months to 16 months16 months to 18 months18 months to 20 months20 months to 22 months22 months to 24 months24 months to 27 months27 months to 30 months30 months to 33 months33 months to 36 months36 months
Discontinuation of TKI Medication0412117523422100112002

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Clinically significant changes in laboratory values and vital signs were reported as AEs or SAEs, as appropriate. Only descriptive analysis. (NCT02272777)
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment to 30 days after last dose of study treatment, up to 31 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Adverse Events (AEs)Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Fatal SAEsAEs leading to drug discontinuationAEs leading to dose adjustment/interruption
Imatinib8210017
Nilotinib8430117

[back to top]

Percent of Baseline Loa Loa Microfilariae

Percent of baseline Loa loa microfilariae as determined by concentrated peripheral blood smear. Daily measurements will be taken the first week, followed by measurements at day 14 and day 21 (NCT02644525)
Timeframe: Days 1-7, 14, 21

,,,
Interventionpercentage of baseline microfilariae (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 2Day 3Day 4Day 5Day 6Day 7Day 14Day 21
Imatinib 200mg114.596.8102.8108.595.5107.078.983.786.5
Imatinib 400mg104.798.084.059.776.962.3136.081.8107.6
Imatinib 600mg102.297.884.888.189.184.183.394.497.4
Placebo88.788.184.673.379.980.476.9100.666.8

[back to top]

Event-free Survival

Events were defined as any of the following: (1) unable to achieve either morphologic complete remission (CR) or MRD- by MFC, (2) relapse after CR, (3) MRD recurrence after achieving MRD-, or (4) death from any cause. (NCT03023046)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Treatment (Chemotherapy)32

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Complete Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) Response Rate

"Response was determined by having no detectable disease by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC-). For Ph+ subjects, complete molecular response (CMR) by BCR-ABL RT-PCR was assigned when MFC was undetectable.~When no measurable residual disease was detected by MFC (MFC-) per EuroFlow criteria, high-throughput sequencing-based MRD testing (HTS; ClonoSEQ) was performed." (NCT03023046)
Timeframe: Within 4 cycles of study therapy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)Participants (Count of Participants)
MFC-72545885MFC-72545886CMR72545885HTS-72545885HTS-72545886
Achieve within 4 cyclesNot achieved within 4 cycles
Ph+ Subjects20
Ph- Subjects9
Ph+ Subjects11
Ph+ Subjects17
Ph+ Subjects8
Ph- Subjects6
Ph+ Subjects16
Ph- Subjects16

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Grade 1 or higher non-hematologic adverse events will be assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. (NCT03023046)
Timeframe: Within 28 days of the last dose of the study drugs

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Chemotherapy)44

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Morphological Complete Response Rate

Morphological complete remission (CR) was determined by bone marrow aspirate morphology and defined as <5% blasts by morphology, absolute neutrophil count >1000/uL, and platelet count >100,000/uL. (NCT03023046)
Timeframe: Within 4 cycles of study therapy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ph+ Subjects27
Ph- Subjects20

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Alive at 2 years after enrollment (NCT03023046)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Treatment (Chemotherapy)70

[back to top]

Rate of Participants With Clinically Relevant Improvement of the Modified Lee cGvHD Symptom Scale Score

"To assess improvement of symptoms based on the total symptom score (TSS); a responder was defined as having achieved a clinically relevant reduction from Baseline of the TSS. The scale consists of 30 items in 7 subscales (skin, eye, mouth, lung, nutrition, energy, and psychological). Participants reported their level of symptom bother over the previous month on a 5-point likert scale: not at all, slightly, moderately, quite a bit, or extremely. Subscale scores and the summary score range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating worse symptoms." (NCT03112603)
Timeframe: Baseline; Cycle 7 Day 1 (each cycle was comprised of 4 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ruxolitinib24.2
Best Available Therapy11.0

[back to top]

Vz/F of Ruxolitinib After Single (Cycle 1 Day 1) and Multiple (Cycle 1 Day 15) Doses

"Vz/F was defined as the apparent oral dose volume of distribution of ruxolitinib. Early enrolling participants (approximately the first 8 adult and first 4 adolescent participants) randomized to ruxolitinib arm followed an extensive PK sampling schedule. Subsequent participants randomized to ruxolitinib, any randomized participants receiving ruxolitinib after Cycle 6, and any randomized participants receiving BAT that cross over to ruxolitinib followed the sparse PK sampling schedule." (NCT03112603)
Timeframe: Extensive Sampling Schedule: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15: predose; 0.5, 1, 1.5, 4, 6, and 9 hours post-dose. Sparse Sampling Schedule: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15: predose; 1.5 hours post-dose

InterventionLiters (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 15
Ruxolitinib54.050.9

[back to top]

Tmax of Ruxolitinib After Single (Cycle 1 Day 1) and Multiple (Cycle 1 Day 15) Doses

"tmax was defined as the time to reach the maximum plasma concentration of ruxolitinib. Early enrolling participants (approximately the first 8 adult and first 4 adolescent participants) randomized to ruxolitinib arm followed an extensive PK sampling schedule. Subsequent participants randomized to ruxolitinib, any randomized participants receiving ruxolitinib after Cycle 6, and any randomized participants receiving BAT that cross over to ruxolitinib followed the sparse PK sampling schedule." (NCT03112603)
Timeframe: Extensive Sampling Schedule: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15: predose; 0.5, 1, 1.5, 4, 6, and 9 hours post-dose. Sparse Sampling Schedule: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15: predose; 1.5 hours post-dose

Interventionhours (Median)
Day 1Day 15
Ruxolitinib0.8331.00

[back to top]

t1/2 of Ruxolitinib After Single (Cycle 1 Day 1) and Multiple (Cycle 1 Day 15) Doses

"t1/2 was defined as the apparent terminal phase disposition half-life of ruxolitinib. Early enrolling participants (approximately the first 8 adult and first 4 adolescent participants) randomized to ruxolitinib arm followed an extensive PK sampling schedule. Subsequent participants randomized to ruxolitinib, any randomized participants receiving ruxolitinib after Cycle 6, and any randomized participants receiving BAT that cross over to ruxolitinib followed the sparse PK sampling schedule." (NCT03112603)
Timeframe: Extensive Sampling Schedule: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15: predose; 0.5, 1, 1.5, 4, 6, and 9 hours post-dose. Sparse Sampling Schedule: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15: predose; 1.5 hours post-dose

Interventionhours (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 15
Ruxolitinib2.402.32

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 50% Reduction in Daily Corticosteroid Dose

All corticosteroid dosages prescribed to the participant and all dose changes during the study were to be recorded for assessment of participants with a ≥ 50% reduction in daily corticosteroid dose. (NCT03112603)
Timeframe: from Day 15 up to Day 182

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 15 to ≤ Day 28Day 29 to ≤ Day 42Day 43 to ≤ Day 56Day 57 to ≤ Day 70Day 71 to ≤ Day 84Day 85 to ≤ Day 98Day 99 to ≤ Day 112Day 113 to ≤ Day 126Day 127 to ≤ Day 140Day 141 to ≤ Day 154Day 155 to ≤ Day 168Day 169 to ≤ Day 182
Best Available Therapy13.233.141.147.951.454.060.466.268.368.371.688.8
Ruxolitinib12.735.048.458.762.369.571.273.272.870.074.681.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Successfully Tapered Off of All Corticosteroids

All corticosteroid dosages prescribed to the participant and all dose changes during the study were to be recorded for assessment of participants who successfully tapered off of all corticosteroids. Participants who completely tapered off corticosteroids refer to those who permanently discontinued steroids as per the dose administration panel and who did not restart steroids in the same interval. Participants who were tapered off and continued follow-up were also counted as being tapered off with 0 dose in subsequent intervals until they discontinued from the main treatment period or restarted steroid treatment. (NCT03112603)
Timeframe: up to Day 179

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 1 to ≤ Day 28Day 29 to ≤ Day 56Day 57 to ≤ Day 84Day 85 to ≤ Day 112Day 113 to ≤ Day 140Day 141 to ≤ Day 168Day 169 to ≤ Day 179
Best Available Therapy2.65.48.510.312.416.815.9
Ruxolitinib2.59.614.016.319.724.224.1

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of Non-relapse Mortality (NRM)

Defined as the cumulative incidence rate from competing risk analysis for NRM from the date of randomization to the date of death not preceded by underlying disease relapse/recurrence. (NCT03112603)
Timeframe: Months 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 3Month 6Month 12Month 18Month 24Month 30Month 36
Best Available Therapy4.446.4315.1216.4819.2219.2222.0
Ruxolitinib5.459.1315.3015.9317.8317.8317.83

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of Malignancy Relapse/Recurrence (MR)

Defined as the cumulative incidence rate from competing risk analysis of MR from the date of randomization to hematologic malignancy relapse/recurrence. (NCT03112603)
Timeframe: Months 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
0 to < 3 months3 to < 6 months6 to < 12 months12 to < 18 months18 to < 24 months24 to <30 months30 to <36 months
Best Available Therapy1.312.656.086.086.086.787.50
Ruxolitinib1.923.225.187.828.488.488.48

[back to top]

Cmax of Ruxolitinib After Single (Cycle 1 Day 1) and Multiple (Cycle 1 Day 15) Doses

"Cmax was defined as the maximum observed plasma concentration of ruxolitinib. Early enrolling participants (approximately the first 8 adult and first 4 adolescent participants) randomized to ruxolitinib arm followed an extensive PK sampling schedule. Subsequent participants randomized to ruxolitinib, any randomized participants receiving ruxolitinib after Cycle 6, and any randomized participants receiving BAT that cross over to ruxolitinib followed the sparse PK sampling schedule." (NCT03112603)
Timeframe: Extensive Sampling Schedule: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15: predose; 0.5, 1, 1.5, 4, 6, and 9 hours post-dose. Sparse Sampling Schedule: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15: predose; 1.5 hours post-dose

Interventionnanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 15
Ruxolitinib167215

[back to top]

CL/F of Ruxolitinib After Single (Cycle 1 Day 1) and Multiple (Cycle 1 Day 15) Doses

"CL/F was defined as the oral dose clearance of ruxolitinib. Early enrolling participants (approximately the first 8 adult and first 4 adolescent participants) randomized to ruxolitinib arm followed an extensive PK sampling schedule. Subsequent participants randomized to ruxolitinib, any randomized participants receiving ruxolitinib after Cycle 6, and any randomized participants receiving BAT that cross over to ruxolitinib followed the sparse PK sampling schedule." (NCT03112603)
Timeframe: Extensive Sampling Schedule: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15: predose; 0.5, 1, 1.5, 4, 6, and 9 hours post-dose. Sparse Sampling Schedule: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15: predose; 1.5 hours post-dose

InterventionLiters/hour (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 15
Ruxolitinib15.615.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bone Marrow Transplantation (FACT-BMT)

"Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The FACT-BMT is a 50-item self-report questionnaire that measures the effect of a therapy on domains including physical, functional, social/family, and emotional well-being, together with additional concerns relevant for bone marrow transplantation participants. The questions were based on a 5-point Likert scale, where 0 corresponds to not at all and 4 corresponds to very much. The higher the final score, the better the quality of life. The FACT-BMT total score ranges from 0 to 148." (NCT03112603)
Timeframe: Baseline; up to Cycle 39 Day 1 (each cycle was comprised of 4 weeks)

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2 Day 1Cycle 3 Day 1Cycle 4 Day 1Cycle 5 Day 1Cycle 6 Day 1Cycle 7 Day 1Cycle 9 Day 1Cycle 12 Day 1Cycle 15 Day 1Cycle 18 Day 1Cycle 21 Day 1Cycle 24 Day 1Cycle 27 Day 1Cycle 30 Day 1Cycle 33 Day 1Cycle 36 Day 1Cycle 39 Day 1
Best Available Therapy-0.22-1.82-1.05-0.232.410.851.203.747.588.193.687.845.105.755.674.776.64
Ruxolitinib2.320.621.981.252.914.145.327.265.074.105.245.906.237.535.178.728.65

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L

The EQ-5D-5L is a descriptive classification consisting of five dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, anxiety/depression, and pain/discomfort. The five-level version (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems) uses a 5-point Likert scale, with 1 being no problems and 5 being extreme problems. (NCT03112603)
Timeframe: Baseline; up to Cycle 39 Day 1 (each cycle was comprised of 4 weeks)

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2 Day 1Cycle 3 Day 1Cycle 4 Day 1Cycle 5 Day 1Cycle 6 Day 1Cycle 7 Day 1Cycle 9 Day 1Cycle 12 Day 1Cycle 15 Day 1Cycle 18 Day 1Cycle 21 Day 1Cycle 24 Day 1Cycle 27 Day 1Cycle 30 Day 1Cycle 33 Day 1Cycle 36 Day 1Cycle 39 Day 1
Best Available Therapy-0.01-0.04-0.01-0.030.01-0.00-0.020.020.030.02-0.000.010.030.010.050.040.01
Ruxolitinib0.030.030.040.020.050.070.070.070.070.070.080.070.060.050.000.060.06

[back to top]

AUClast of Ruxolitinib After Single (Cycle 1 Day 1) and Multiple (Cycle 1 Day 15) Doses

"AUClast was defined as the area under the concentration-time curve up to the last measurable concentration of ruxolitinib. Early enrolling participants (approximately the first 8 adult and first 4 adolescent participants) randomized to ruxolitinib arm followed an extensive PK sampling schedule. Subsequent participants randomized to ruxolitinib, any randomized participants receiving ruxolitinib after Cycle 6, and any randomized participants receiving BAT that cross over to ruxolitinib followed the sparse PK sampling schedule." (NCT03112603)
Timeframe: Extensive Sampling Schedule: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15: predose; 0.5, 1, 1.5, 4, 6, and 9 hours post-dose. Sparse Sampling Schedule: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15: predose; 1.5 hours post-dose

Interventionng*hour/mL (Geometric Mean)
Day 1Day 15
Ruxolitinib636945

[back to top]

AUCinf of Ruxolitinib After Single (Cycle 1 Day 1) and Multiple (Cycle 1 Day 15) Doses

"AUCinf was defined as the area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity. Early enrolling participants (approximately the first 8 adult and first 4 adolescent participants) randomized to ruxolitinib arm followed an extensive PK sampling schedule. Subsequent participants randomized to ruxolitinib, any randomized participants receiving ruxolitinib after Cycle 6, and any randomized participants receiving BAT that cross over to ruxolitinib followed the sparse PK sampling schedule." (NCT03112603)
Timeframe: Extensive Sampling Schedule: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15: predose; 0.5, 1, 1.5, 4, 6, and 9 hours post-dose. Sparse Sampling Schedule: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15: predose; 1.5 hours post-dose

Interventionng*hour/mL (Geometric Mean)
Day 1
Ruxolitinib642

[back to top]

Utilization of Medical Resources

The percentage of participants with at least one submission to healthcare encounter was assessed. (NCT03112603)
Timeframe: from Baseline to LPLV (approximately 5 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ruxolitinib57.0
Best Available Therapy65.8

[back to top]

Rate of FFS at Study Completion

Composite time to event endpoint incorporating the following FFS events: (i) relapse or recurrence of underlying disease or death due to underlying disease, (ii) nonrelapse mortality, or (iii) addition or initiation of another systemic therapy for cGvHD. (NCT03112603)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Last Participant Last Visit (LPLV) (approximately 5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ruxolitinib38.4
Best Available Therapy5.7

[back to top]

Rate of Failure-free Survival (FFS)

Composite time to event endpoint incorporating the following FFS events: (i) relapse or recurrence of underlying disease or death due to underlying disease, (ii) nonrelapse mortality, or (iii) addition or initiation of another systemic therapy for cGvHD. (NCT03112603)
Timeframe: Baseline to when the last participant reached Cycle 7 Day 1 (each cycle was comprised of 4 weeks)

Interventionmonths (Median)
RuxolitinibNA
Best Available Therapy5.7

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. (NCT03112603)
Timeframe: from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause up to LPLV (approximately 5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
RuxolitinibNA
Best Available TherapyNA

[back to top]

ORR at the End of Cycle 3

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants in each arm demonstrating a CR or PR based on cGvHD disease assessments (National Institutes of Health Consensus Criteria) without the requirement of additional systemic therapies for an earlier progression, mixed response, or non-response. Scoring of response was relative to the organ score at the time of randomization. CR: complete resolution of all signs and symptoms of cGVHD in all evaluable organs without the initiation or addition of new systemic therapy. PR: improvement in at least one organ (e.g., improvement of 1 or more points on a 4- to 7-point scale, or an improvement of 2 or more points on a 10- to 12-point scale) without progression in other organs or sites, initiation, or addition of new systemic therapies. (NCT03112603)
Timeframe: Cycle 4 Day 1 (each cycle was comprised of 4 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ruxolitinib54.5
Best Available Therapy31.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)

Adverse events were defined as the appearance of (or worsening of any pre-existing) undesirable signs, symptoms, or medical conditions that occurred after the participant's signed informed consent was obtained. Abnormal laboratory values or test results occurring after informed consent constituted adverse events only if they induced clinical signs or symptoms, were considered clinically significant, required therapy (e.g., hematologic abnormality that required transfusion or hematological stem cell support), or required changes in study medication(s). TEAEs were defined as those AEs that started or worsened during the on-treatment period (either randomized or cross-over period). (NCT03112603)
Timeframe: from Baseline to LPLV (approximately 5 years)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ruxolitinib165
Best Available Therapy148
Ruxolitinib Cross-Over Period70

[back to top]

Efficacy of Ruxolitinib Versus Investigator's Choice Best Available Therapy (BAT) in Participants With Moderate or Severe Steroid Refractory Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (SR-cGvHD) Assessed by Overall Response Rate (ORR) at the Cycle 7 Day 1 Visit

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants in each arm demonstrating a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on chronic GvHD (cGvHD) disease assessments (National Institutes of Health Consensus Criteria) without the requirement of additional systemic therapies for an earlier progression, mixed response, or non-response. Scoring of response was relative to the organ score at the time of randomization. CR: complete resolution of all signs and symptoms of cGVHD in all evaluable organs without the initiation or addition of new systemic therapy. PR: improvement in at least one organ (e.g., improvement of 1 or more points on a 4- to 7-point scale, or an improvement of 2 or more points on a 10- to 12-point scale) without progression in other organs or sites, initiation, or addition of new systemic therapies. (NCT03112603)
Timeframe: Cycle 7 Day 1 (each cycle was comprised of 4 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ruxolitinib49.7
Best Available Therapy25.6

[back to top]

Duration of Response Through Study Completion

DOR was defined as the time from first response until cGvHD progression, death, or the date of change/addition of systemic therapies for cGvHD and as assessed for responders only. Response was based on cGvHD disease assessments (National Institutes of Health consensus criteria). Duration of response was evaluated in participants who achieved a CR or PR at or before Cycle 7 Day 1. The analysis included a larger number of participants than the number of participants who achieved CR or PR at Cycle 7 Day 1 (82 ruxolitinib and 42 BAT) because the analysis took into account not only those participants who achieved CR or PR at Cycle 7 Day 1, but also participants who achieved CR or PR before Cycle 7 Day 1 but who may have lost their response at Cycle 7 Day 1. For this reason, the number of participants in this analysis does not align with the best overall response (BOR) at Cycle 7 Day 1. This analysis was based on the cutoff date upon study completion (December 2022). (NCT03112603)
Timeframe: from first response to LPLV (approximately 5 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
RuxolitinibNA
Best Available Therapy6.4

[back to top]

BOR During Cross-over Treatment With Ruxolitinib

BOR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved an overall response (CR+PR) based on cGvHD disease assessments (National Institutes of Health Consensus Criteria) without the requirement of additional systemic therapies for an earlier progression, mixed response, or non-response at any time point (up to Cycle 7 Day 1 or the start of additional systemic therapy for cGvHD). Scoring of response was relative to the organ score at the time of randomization. CR: complete resolution of all signs and symptoms of cGVHD in all evaluable organs without the initiation or addition of new systemic therapy. PR: improvement in at least one organ (e.g., improvement of 1 or more points on a 4- to 7-point scale, or an improvement of 2 or more points on a 10- to 12-point scale) without progression in other organs or sites, initiation, or addition of new systemic therapies. (NCT03112603)
Timeframe: from Crossover Cycle 1 Day 1 to any time point up to and including Crossover Cycle 7 Day 1 (each cycle was comprised of 4 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ruxolitinib Cross-Over Period81.4

[back to top]

Best Overall Response (BOR) at Cycle 7 Day 1

BOR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved an overall response (CR+PR) based on cGvHD disease assessments (National Institutes of Health Consensus Criteria) without the requirement of additional systemic therapies for an earlier progression, mixed response, or non-response at any time point (up to Cycle 7 Day 1 or the start of additional systemic therapy for cGvHD). Scoring of response was relative to the organ score at the time of randomization. CR: complete resolution of all signs and symptoms of cGVHD in all evaluable organs without the initiation or addition of new systemic therapy. PR: improvement in at least one organ (e.g., improvement of 1 or more points on a 4- to 7-point scale, or an improvement of 2 or more points on a 10- to 12-point scale) without progression in other organs or sites, initiation, or addition of new systemic therapies. This analysis was based on the primary cutoff date (May 2020). (NCT03112603)
Timeframe: up to Cycle 7 Day 1 (each cycle was comprised of 4 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ruxolitinib76.4
Best Available Therapy60.4

[back to top]

Serum VEGF-D

Change in the square root of the intrasubject plasma VEGF-D (NCT03131999)
Timeframe: Before and 1 month after initiation of monotherapy imatinib mesylate or placebo

InterventionLog transformed VEGF-D change pg/dL (Mean)
Imatinib Mesylate 400mg Capsule0.05
Placebo Capsule0.07

[back to top]

Adverse Events

Adverse event and Serious Adverse Event numbers using the CTCAE Version 4.03 definitions (NCT03131999)
Timeframe: 3 months

,
Interventionnumber of events (Number)
Adverse EventsSerious Adverse Events
Imatinib Mesylate 400mg Capsule100
Placebo Capsule120

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Negative Complete Remission (CR) at The End of Induction Phase

MRD-negative CR was achieved when a participant met the criteria for both MRD negativity and CR. MRD-negativity: ≤0.01 % breakpoint cluster region-Abelson (BCR-ABL1/ABL1), or undetectable BCR-ABL1 transcripts in complementary deoxyribonucleic acid (cDNA) with ≥ 10,000 ABL1 transcripts. CR: meeting all the following for at least 4 weeks (that is no recurrence):1. No circulating blasts and less than (<) 5% blasts in the bone marrow (BM). 2. Normal maturation of all cellular components in the BM. 3. No extramedullary disease (central nervous system [CNS] involvement, lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, skin/gum infiltration, testicular mass). 4. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 1000 per microliter (/mcL) (or >1.0*10^9/L). 5. Platelets >100,000/mcL (or >100*10^9/L). (NCT03589326)
Timeframe: From Cycle 1 through Cycle 3 (approximately 3 months) (Cycle length = 28 days)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort A: Ponatinib 30 mg53
Cohort B: Imatinib 600 mg13

[back to top]

White Blood Cell Count

The normal range for white blood cell counts is between 4,000 and 11,000 cells per microliter. White blood cell counts increase during infections, autoimmune diseases and some types of cancer. Low white blood cell counts occur with immune system diseases and certain types of cancer. (NCT03891901)
Timeframe: Days 1, 7, 14, 21, 28, 42

,,
Interventioncells/µL (Mean)
Day 1Day 7Day 14Day 21Day 28Day 42
Cohort 1a: Imatinib (50 mg) + Rifabutin + Isoniazid555853915841487541415841
Cohort 1b: Imatinib (100 mg) + Rifabutin + Isoniazid630059005150365016005800
Imatinib (100 mg)590055005400475048005300

[back to top]

Number of Myelomonocytic Cells in the Blood

Immunologic effects of the study treatment are assessed by counting myelomonocytic cells in blood samples. An increase in myelomonocytic cells is used to determine the appropriate therapeutic dose of imatinib. (NCT03891901)
Timeframe: Days 1, 7, 14, 21, 28, 42

,,
Interventioncells per microliter (µL) (Mean)
Day 1Day 7Day 14Day 21Day 28Day 42
Cohort 1a: Imatinib (50 mg) + Rifabutin + Isoniazid319732413418302123563629
Cohort 1b: Imatinib (100 mg) + Rifabutin + Isoniazid434036803195256011404425
Imatinib (100 mg)339030753195278524803255

[back to top]

Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Imatinib

Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses of imatinib were collected at 6 time points over approximately 24 hours. Samples collection occurred at hour 0 (pre-dose), and 0.5 hours, 2 hours, 4.0 hours, 8.0 hours, and 24 hours post-dose. PK samples were taken after 14 days of imatinib alone (all study arms) and after 14 days of imatinib with rifabutin and isoniazid (Cohorts 1a and 1b). The PK parameter Cmax is the highest concentration of imatinib in blood following dosing. (NCT03891901)
Timeframe: Day 14, Day 28

,
Interventionmicrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL) (Median)
After 14 days of imatinibAfter 14 days of imatinib plus rifabutin and isoniazid
Cohort 1a: Imatinib (50 mg) + Rifabutin + Isoniazid0.410.71
Cohort 1b: Imatinib (100 mg) + Rifabutin + Isoniazid0.690.69

[back to top]

Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Imatinib

Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses of imatinib were collected at 6 time points over approximately 24 hours. Samples collection occurred at hour 0 (pre-dose), and 0.5 hours, 2 hours, 4.0 hours, 8.0 hours, and 24 hours post-dose. PK samples were taken after 14 days of imatinib alone (all study arms) and after 14 days of imatinib with rifabutin and isoniazid (Cohorts 1a and 1b). The PK parameter Cmax is the highest concentration of imatinib in blood following dosing. (NCT03891901)
Timeframe: Day 14, Day 28

Interventionmicrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL) (Median)
After 14 days of imatinib
Imatinib (100 mg)0.51

[back to top]

Half-life (T1/2) of Imatinib

Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses of imatinib were collected at 6 time points over approximately 24 hours. Samples collection occurred at hour 0 (pre-dose), and 0.5 hours, 2 hours, 4.0 hours, 8.0 hours, and 24 hours post-dose. PK samples were taken after 14 days of imatinib alone (all study arms) and after 14 days of imatinib with rifabutin and isoniazid (Cohorts 1a and 1b). The PK parameter T1/2 is the time when imatinib in blood is half of the maximum concentration. (NCT03891901)
Timeframe: Day 14, Day 28

,
Interventionhours (Median)
After 14 days of imatinibAfter 14 days of imatinib plus rifabutin and isoniazid
Cohort 1a: Imatinib (50 mg) + Rifabutin + Isoniazid11.329.91
Cohort 1b: Imatinib (100 mg) + Rifabutin + Isoniazid15.017.83

[back to top]

Half-life (T1/2) of Imatinib

Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses of imatinib were collected at 6 time points over approximately 24 hours. Samples collection occurred at hour 0 (pre-dose), and 0.5 hours, 2 hours, 4.0 hours, 8.0 hours, and 24 hours post-dose. PK samples were taken after 14 days of imatinib alone (all study arms) and after 14 days of imatinib with rifabutin and isoniazid (Cohorts 1a and 1b). The PK parameter T1/2 is the time when imatinib in blood is half of the maximum concentration. (NCT03891901)
Timeframe: Day 14, Day 28

Interventionhours (Median)
After 14 days of imatinib
Imatinib (100 mg)11.00

[back to top]

Elimination Rate Constant (Ke) of Imatinib

Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses of imatinib were collected at 6 time points over approximately 24 hours. Samples collection occurred at hour 0 (pre-dose), and 0.5 hours, 2 hours, 4.0 hours, 8.0 hours, and 24 hours post-dose. PK samples were taken after 14 days of imatinib alone (all study arms) and after 14 days of imatinib with rifabutin and isoniazid (Cohorts 1a and 1b). The elimination rate constant is the rate that imatinib is removed from the body. (NCT03891901)
Timeframe: Day 14, Day 28

,
Intervention1/hour (Median)
After 14 days of imatinibAfter 14 days of imatinib plus rifabutin and isoniazid
Cohort 1a: Imatinib (50 mg) + Rifabutin + Isoniazid0.060.07
Cohort 1b: Imatinib (100 mg) + Rifabutin + Isoniazid0.050.09

[back to top]

Elimination Rate Constant (Ke) of Rifabutin

Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses of rifabutin were collected at 6 time points over approximately 24 hours. Samples collection occurred at hour 0 (pre-dose), and 0.5 hours, 2 hours, 4.0 hours, 8.0 hours, and 24 hours post-dose. PK samples were taken after 14 days of imatinib with rifabutin and isoniazid (Cohorts 1a and 1b). The elimination rate constant is the rate that the drug is removed from the body. (NCT03891901)
Timeframe: Day 28

Intervention1/hour (Median)
Cohort 1a: Imatinib (50 mg) + Rifabutin + Isoniazid0.07
Cohort 1b: Imatinib (100 mg) + Rifabutin + Isoniazid0.09

[back to top]

Frequency of Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events (AEs)

"The number of grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurring among study participants is presented here. Adverse events are graded using the FDA Guidance Document, Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials Guidance for Industry, September 2007, or other guidance, as applicable." (NCT03891901)
Timeframe: Measured through Day 50

InterventionGrade 3 or 4 adverse events (Number)
Cohort 1a: Imatinib (50 mg) + Rifabutin + Isoniazid4
Cohort 1b: Imatinib (100 mg) + Rifabutin + Isoniazid6
Imatinib (100 mg)0

[back to top]

Frequency of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

"The number of serious adverse events occurring among study participants is presented here. Adverse events are graded using the FDA Guidance Document, Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials Guidance for Industry, September 2007, or other guidance, as applicable." (NCT03891901)
Timeframe: Measured through Day 50

Interventionserious adverse events (Number)
Cohort 1a: Imatinib (50 mg) + Rifabutin + Isoniazid0
Cohort 1b: Imatinib (100 mg) + Rifabutin + Isoniazid0
Imatinib (100 mg)0

[back to top]

Half-life (T1/2) of Isoniazid

Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses of isoniazid were collected at 6 time points over approximately 24 hours. Samples collection occurred at hour 0 (pre-dose), and 0.5 hours, 2 hours, 4.0 hours, 8.0 hours, and 24 hours post-dose. PK samples were taken after 14 days of imatinib with rifabutin and isoniazid (Cohorts 1a and 1b). The PK parameter T1/2 is the time when the drug in blood is half of the maximum concentration. (NCT03891901)
Timeframe: Day 28

Interventionhours (Median)
Cohort 1a: Imatinib (50 mg) + Rifabutin + Isoniazid1.59
Cohort 1b: Imatinib (100 mg) + Rifabutin + Isoniazid2.44

[back to top]

Half-life (T1/2) of Rifabutin

Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses of rifabutin were collected at 6 time points over approximately 24 hours. Samples collection occurred at hour 0 (pre-dose), and 0.5 hours, 2 hours, 4.0 hours, 8.0 hours, and 24 hours post-dose. PK samples were taken after 14 days of imatinib with rifabutin and isoniazid (Cohorts 1a and 1b). The PK parameter T1/2 is the time when the drug in blood is half of the maximum concentration. (NCT03891901)
Timeframe: Day 28

Interventionhours (Median)
Cohort 1a: Imatinib (50 mg) + Rifabutin + Isoniazid9.65
Cohort 1b: Imatinib (100 mg) + Rifabutin + Isoniazid8.14

[back to top]

Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Rifabutin

Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses of rifabutin were collected at 6 time points over approximately 24 hours. Samples collection occurred at hour 0 (pre-dose), and 0.5 hours, 2 hours, 4.0 hours, 8.0 hours, and 24 hours post-dose. PK samples were taken after 14 days of imatinib with rifabutin and isoniazid (Cohorts 1a and 1b). The PK parameter Cmax is the highest concentration of the drug in blood following dosing. (NCT03891901)
Timeframe: Day 28

Interventionmcg/mL (Median)
Cohort 1a: Imatinib (50 mg) + Rifabutin + Isoniazid0.37
Cohort 1b: Imatinib (100 mg) + Rifabutin + Isoniazid0.53

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Imatinib

Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses of imatinib were collected at 6 time points over approximately 24 hours. Samples collection occurred at hour 0 (pre-dose), and 0.5 hours, 2 hours, 4.0 hours, 8.0 hours, and 24 hours post-dose. PK samples were taken after 14 days of imatinib alone (all study arms) and after 14 days of imatinib with rifabutin and isoniazid (Cohorts 1a and 1b). The PK parameter AUC is the overall exposure to imatinib. (NCT03891901)
Timeframe: Day 14, Day 28

Interventionhour*mcg/mL (Median)
After 14 days of imatinib
Imatinib (100 mg)5.80

[back to top]

Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Isoniazid

Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses of isoniazid were collected at 6 time points over approximately 24 hours. Samples collection occurred at hour 0 (pre-dose), and 0.5 hours, 2 hours, 4.0 hours, 8.0 hours, and 24 hours post-dose. PK samples were taken after 14 days of imatinib with rifabutin and isoniazid (Cohorts 1a and 1b). The PK parameter Cmax is the highest concentration of the drug in blood following dosing. (NCT03891901)
Timeframe: Day 28

Interventionmcg/mL (Median)
Cohort 1a: Imatinib (50 mg) + Rifabutin + Isoniazid3.14
Cohort 1b: Imatinib (100 mg) + Rifabutin + Isoniazid3.66

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Imatinib

Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses of imatinib were collected at 6 time points over approximately 24 hours. Samples collection occurred at hour 0 (pre-dose), and 0.5 hours, 2 hours, 4.0 hours, 8.0 hours, and 24 hours post-dose. PK samples were taken after 14 days of imatinib alone (all study arms) and after 14 days of imatinib with rifabutin and isoniazid (Cohorts 1a and 1b). The PK parameter AUC is the overall exposure to imatinib. (NCT03891901)
Timeframe: Day 14, Day 28

,
Interventionhour*mcg/mL (Median)
After 14 days of imatinibAfter 14 days of imatinib plus rifabutin and isoniazid
Cohort 1a: Imatinib (50 mg) + Rifabutin + Isoniazid4.767.52
Cohort 1b: Imatinib (100 mg) + Rifabutin + Isoniazid9.467.49

[back to top]

Elimination Rate Constant (Ke) of Imatinib

Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses of imatinib were collected at 6 time points over approximately 24 hours. Samples collection occurred at hour 0 (pre-dose), and 0.5 hours, 2 hours, 4.0 hours, 8.0 hours, and 24 hours post-dose. PK samples were taken after 14 days of imatinib alone (all study arms) and after 14 days of imatinib with rifabutin and isoniazid (Cohorts 1a and 1b). The elimination rate constant is the rate that imatinib is removed from the body. (NCT03891901)
Timeframe: Day 14, Day 28

Intervention1/hour (Median)
After 14 days of imatinib
Imatinib (100 mg)0.06

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Isoniazid

Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses of isoniazid were collected at 6 time points over approximately 24 hours. Samples collection occurred at hour 0 (pre-dose), and 0.5 hours, 2 hours, 4.0 hours, 8.0 hours, and 24 hours post-dose. PK samples were taken after 14 days of imatinib with rifabutin and isoniazid (Cohorts 1a and 1b). The PK parameter AUC is the overall exposure to the drug. (NCT03891901)
Timeframe: Day 28

Interventionhour*mcg/mL (Median)
Cohort 1a: Imatinib (50 mg) + Rifabutin + Isoniazid9.79
Cohort 1b: Imatinib (100 mg) + Rifabutin + Isoniazid16.11

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Rifabutin

Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses of rifabutin were collected at 6 time points over approximately 24 hours. Samples collection occurred at hour 0 (pre-dose), and 0.5 hours, 2 hours, 4.0 hours, 8.0 hours, and 24 hours post-dose. PK samples were taken after 14 days of imatinib with rifabutin and isoniazid (Cohorts 1a and 1b). The PK parameter AUC is the overall exposure to the drug. (NCT03891901)
Timeframe: Day 28

Interventionhour*mcg/mL (Median)
Cohort 1a: Imatinib (50 mg) + Rifabutin + Isoniazid3.68
Cohort 1b: Imatinib (100 mg) + Rifabutin + Isoniazid5.11

[back to top]

Elimination Rate Constant (Ke) of Isoniazid

Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses of isoniazid were collected at 6 time points over approximately 24 hours. Samples collection occurred at hour 0 (pre-dose), and 0.5 hours, 2 hours, 4.0 hours, 8.0 hours, and 24 hours post-dose. PK samples were taken after 14 days of imatinib with rifabutin and isoniazid (Cohorts 1a and 1b). The elimination rate constant is the rate that the drug is removed from the body. (NCT03891901)
Timeframe: Day 28

Intervention1/hour (Median)
Cohort 1a: Imatinib (50 mg) + Rifabutin + Isoniazid0.44
Cohort 1b: Imatinib (100 mg) + Rifabutin + Isoniazid0.28

[back to top]

Overall Survival Rate: Type of Second Line TKI

Overall survival rate in this study was defined as percentage of participants alive during analysis period of 01-January-2011 till 30-June-2020. 5 years overall survival rate was demonstrated with Kaplan-Meier curve. (NCT05286528)
Timeframe: 5 years, during analysis period from 01-January-2011 till 30-June-2020 (retrieved data assessed in this observational study for approximately 1.2 years)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Participants With CML71.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival Rate: Type of First Line TKI

Overall survival rate in this study was defined as percentage of participants alive during analysis period of 01-January-2011 till 30-June-2020. 5 years overall survival rate was demonstrated with Kaplan-Meier curve. (NCT05286528)
Timeframe: 5 years, during analysis period from 01-January-2011 till 30-June-2020 (retrieved data assessed in this observational study for approximately 1.2 years)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Participants With CML77.1

[back to top]

Overall Survival Rate: All Participants

Overall survival rate in this study was defined as percentage of participants alive during analysis period of 01-January-2011 till 30-June-2020. 5 years overall survival rate was demonstrated with Kaplan-Meier curve. (NCT05286528)
Timeframe: 5 years, during analysis period from 01-January-2011 till 30-June-2020 (retrieved data assessed in this observational study for approximately 1.2 years)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Participants With CML77.1

[back to top]