Page last updated: 2024-12-10

misoprostol

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

Misoprostol: A synthetic analog of natural prostaglandin E1. It produces a dose-related inhibition of gastric acid and pepsin secretion, and enhances mucosal resistance to injury. It is an effective anti-ulcer agent and also has oxytocic properties. [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

misoprostol : A diastereoisomeric mixture composed of approximately equal amounts of a double racemate of four of the sixteen possible diastereoisomers of methyl (13E)-11,16-dihydroxy-16-methyl-9-oxoprost-13-en-1-oate that is racemic prostaglandin E1 which is lacking the hydroxy group at position 15, but which has an additional hydroxy group at position 16. It is a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analogue, used in the treatment of gastric and duodenal ulcers. A weak abortifacient, it is also used for cervical ripening prior to surgical termination of pregnancy. The (11R,16S)-diastereoisomer is the pharmacologically active form. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID44828492
CHEMBL ID1553629
SCHEMBL ID18958918
MeSH IDM0025309
PubMed CID5282381
CHEMBL ID606
CHEBI ID94387
CHEBI ID63610
SCHEMBL ID7787
MeSH IDM0025309

Synonyms (161)

Synonym
HY-13288
NCGC00186033-01
bdbm50389939
CHEMBL1553629 ,
5-chloro-3-ethyl-n-{2-[4-(piperidin-1-yl)phenyl]ethyl}-1h-indole-2-carboxamide
org 27569
ORG27569 ,
LP01016
CS-0514
S1534
868273-06-7
5-chloro-3-ethyl-1h-indole-2-carboxylic acid (2-(4-piperidin-1-yl)phenylethyl)amide
gtpl7851
5-chloro-3-ethyl-n-[2-(4-piperidin-1-ylphenyl)ethyl]-1h-indole-2-carboxamide
AKOS022184226
5-chloro-3-ethyl-n-(4-(piperidin-1-yl)phenethyl)-1h-indole-2-carboxamide
5-chloro-3-ethyl-n-[2-[4-(1-piperidinyl)phenyl]ethyl-1h-indole-2-carboxamide
org-27569
AC-32888
DTXSID00660764
5-chloro-3-ethyl-n-[2-[4-(1-piperidinyl)phenyl]ethyl]-1h-indole-2-carboxamide
J-517342
SCHEMBL18958918
HMS3651O11
org 27569, >=98% (hplc)
SW219411-1
BCP08021
ab120342
EX-A2224
Q7101736
9gl ,
SB19548
SDCCGSBI-0633776.P001
CCG-268766
AS-56123
A853025
unii-7yw2s3z2cb
5-chloro-3-ethyl-n-(2-(4-(piperidin-1-yl)phenyl)ethyl)-1h-indole-2-carboxamide
1h-indole-2-carboxamide, 5-chloro-3-ethyl-n-(2-(4-(1-piperidinyl)phenyl)ethyl)-
7yw2s3z2cb ,
AB00513745-05
gtpl1936
smr000058558
sc-29333 ,
misodel
gymiso
xp-16j
isprelor
MLS000028863
cytotec
misopess
methyl (11alpha,13e)-11,16-dihydroxy-16-methyl-9-oxoprost-13-en-1-oate
SMP1_000193
methyl (+-)-11-alpha,16-dihydroxy-16-methyl-9-oxoprost-13-en-1-oate
ccris 6859
prost-13-en-1-oic acid, 11,16-dihydroxy-16-methyl-9-oxo-, methyl ester, (11alpha,13e)-
sc 29333
prost-13-en-1-oic acid, 11,16-dihydroxy-16-methyl-9-oxo-, methyl ester, (11alpha,13e)-(+-)-
brn 4155643
(11-alpha,13e)-(+-)-11,16-dihydroxy-16-methyl-9-oxoprost-13-en-1-oic acid methyl ester
misoprostolum [inn-latin]
(+-)-methyl (1r,2r,3r)-3-hydroxy-2-((e)-(4rs)-4-hydroxy-4-methyl-1-octenyl)-5-oxocyclopentaneheptanoate
hsdb 3573
misoprostol
misoprostol, >=99% (hplc)
DB00929
cytotec (tn)
59122-46-2
misoprostol (jan/usp/inn)
D00419
NCGC00162445-01
NCGC00162445-02
HMS2090L10
CHEMBL606
misoprostol, 1% in cellulose
A832173
methyl 7-[(1r,2r,3r)-2-[(e)-4-methyl-4-oxidanyl-oct-1-enyl]-3-oxidanyl-5-oxidanylidene-cyclopentyl]heptanoate
7-[(1r,2r,3r)-3-hydroxy-2-[(e)-4-hydroxy-4-methyloct-1-enyl]-5-oxocyclopentyl]heptanoic acid methyl ester
NCGC00162445-03
methyl 7-[(1r,2r,3r)-3-hydroxy-2-[(e)-4-hydroxy-4-methyloct-1-enyl]-5-oxocyclopentyl]heptanoate
dtxsid7020897 ,
cas-59122-46-2
dtxcid70897
tox21_112010
bdbm85606
misoprostol (methyl ester)
mvi 200
misogon
misoprostil
misotac
misoprostol [usan:usp:inn:ban:jan]
misotol
misoprostolum
unii-0e43v0bb57
misoprost
0e43v0bb57 ,
AKOS015899652
BRD-A50310035-001-01-6
misoprostol component of arthrotec
misoprostol [usan]
misoprostol [usp monograph]
misoprostol [inn]
misoprostol [ep monograph]
misoprostol [who-dd]
arthrotec component misoprostol
misoprostol [mart.]
misoprostol [hsdb]
misoprostol [orange book]
prost-13-en-1-oic acid, 11,16-dihydroxy-16-methyl-9-oxo-, methyl ester, (11.alpha.,13e)-(+/-)-
misoprostol [usp-rs]
misoprostol [vandf]
(+/-)-methyl (1r,2r,3r)-3-hydroxy-2-((e)-(4rs)-4-hydroxy-4-methyl-1-octenyl)-5-oxocyclopentaneheptanoate
misoprostol [mi]
misoprostol [jan]
CCG-221093
HY-B0610
SCHEMBL7787
(+/-) methyl-11alpha,16-dihydroxy-16-methyl-9-oxoprost-13e-en-1-oate
(+/-) methyl 11alpha, 16-dihydroxy-16-methyl-9-oxoprost-13e-en-1-oate
OJLOPKGSLYJEMD-URPKTTJQSA-N
(+/-) methyl-11alpha,16-dihydroxy-16-methyl-9-oxoprost13e-en-1-oate
(+/-) methyl 11alpha,16-dihydroxy-16-methyl-9-oxoprost-13e-en-1-oate
103601-27-0
prost-?13-?en-?1-?oic acid, 11,?16-?dihydroxy-?16-?methyl-?9-?oxo-?, methyl ester, (11alpha,?13e)?-?, mixt. with cellulose 2-?hydroxypropyl methyl ether
Q-201409
(+/-)-(11a,13e)-11,16-dihydroxy-16-methyl-9-oxo-prost-13-en-1-oic acid methyl ester
methyl 7-((1r,2r,3r)-3-hydroxy-2-((e)-4-hydroxy-4-methyloct-1-en-1-yl)-5-oxocyclopentyl)heptanoate
HMS3648F03
REGID_FOR_CID_5282381
methyl 7-[(1r,2r,3r)-3-hydroxy-2-[(1e)-4-hydroxy-4-methyloct-1-en-1-yl]-5-oxocyclopentyl]heptanoate
sr-01000695425
SR-01000695425-2
misoprostol, united states pharmacopeia (usp) reference standard
CHEBI:94387
misoprostol, european pharmacopoeia (ep) reference standard
misoprostol for system suitability, european pharmacopoeia (ep) reference standard
HMS3715K08
EX-A1774
Q416025
rel-methyl 7-((1r,2r,3r)-3-hydroxy-2-((e)-4-hydroxy-4-methyloct-1-en-1-yl)-5-oxocyclopentyl)heptanoate
SR-01000695425-4
62015-39-8
methyl 7-((1r,2r,3r)-3-hydroxy-2-((e)-4-hydroxy-4-methyloct-1-enyl)-5-oxocyclopentyl)heptanoate
prost-13-en-1-oic acid, 11,16-dihydroxy-16-methyl-9-oxo-, methyl ester,(11a,13e)-
9-oxo-11alpha,16-dihydroxy-16-methyl-prost-13e-en-1-oic acid, methyl ester
AS-83017
F88033
848849-83-2
EN300-7483126
chebi:63610
misoprostol (usp-rs)
misoprostol 1%
g02ad06
misoprostol (ep monograph)
misoprostol 1% dispersion
misoprostol (usp monograph)
misoprostol (mart.)
misoprostolo
misoprostol (usan:usp:inn:ban:jan)
misoprostolum (inn-latin)
a02bb01

Research Excerpts

Overview

Misoprostol is a synthetic prostaglandin E1 derivative that has been used to treat duodenal and gastric ulcers, and to prevent ulcers caused by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. It has been acknowledged as an effective inhibitor of gastric acid secretion when administered intravenously.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Misoprostol is a medicine with a "double" social life recorded in several places, including Brazil. "( Misoprostol on trial: a descriptive study of the criminalization of an essential medicine in Brazil.
Assis, MP, 2021
)
3.51
"Misoprostol is a synthetic prostaglandin E1 derivative that has been used to treat duodenal and gastric ulcers, and to prevent ulcers caused by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in many countries. "( Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Misoprostol Tablets: An Open-Label, Randomized, Single-dose, Crossover Study With Healthy Chinese Volunteers.
Chang, D; Dai, Y; Guo, S; Han, Y; Ni, S; Wang, S; Wei, H; Wu, F; Xia, Q; Zhang, J; Zhao, X, 2022
)
2.43
"Misoprostol is a synthetic prostaglandin that is related structurally to naturally occurring prostaglandin (PG), and it has been acknowledged as an effective inhibitor of gastric acid secretion when administered intravenously."( Synthesis of Misoprostol, and Intramolecular Isomerization of A-Type Misoprostol into B-Type Misoprostol using 1, 8-Diazabicyclo [5.4.0] undec- 7-ene (DBU).
Cheedarala, RK; Guttikonda, NR; Jaggavarapu, RMR; Kamatham, RR; Nagarjuna, A; Surepally, R; Venkatanarayana, M, 2023
)
2.72
"Misoprostol alone is a safe and effective option for terminating second-trimester pregnancies with one or more previous CSs in settings where mifepristone is unavailable."( The safety of misoprostol alone use for second-trimester termination of pregnancy in women with previous caesarean deliveries.
Dundar, B; Erturk, A; Karapinar, BT; Kender Erturk, N; Tasgoz, FN, 2022
)
2.52
"Misoprostol is a synthetic PGE"( Efficacy and safety of oral and sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Constantinou, T; Daskalakis, G; Koumenis, A; Panagiotopoulos, M; Pergialiotis, V; Stavros, S; Vogiatzi Vokotopoulou, L; Voskos, A, 2023
)
2.6
"Misoprostol is an acceptable and feasible treatment option for women seeking postabortion care at secondary facilities in Myanmar. "( Introducing misoprostol for treatment of incomplete abortion: A feasibility and acceptability study in secondary-level health facilities in Myanmar.
Ku, SK; Mary, M; Maung, HN; Maung, TM; Tin, KN; Winikoff, B, 2023
)
2.73
"Misoprostol is a safe alternative to Dinoprostone gel for induction of labor and found to be more effective labor-inducing agent. "( Comparison of fetal safety of vaginal Misoprostol tablet and Dinoprostone gel for induction of labor: An open-label randomized control trial.
Bag, T; Chakraborty, A; Das, P; Mistri, PK; Pande, A; Rakshit, BM; Samanta, A, 2023
)
2.62
"Misoprostol-only is a safe and effective option for medication abortion in the first trimester if mifepristone is unavailable or inaccessible."( Effectiveness and safety of misoprostol-only for first-trimester medication abortion: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Raymond, EG; Shochet, T; Weaver, MA, 2023
)
2.65
"Oral misoprostol appears to be a safe and effective for IOL in TPROM. "( Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labour in Term PROM: A Systematic Review.
Kale, M; Mannerfeldt, J; Metcalfe, A; Padayachee, L, 2020
)
1.59
"Misoprostol is an alternative to manual vacuum aspiration for the treatment of incomplete miscarriage."( Misoprostol versus manual vacuum aspiration for treatment of first-trimester incomplete miscarriage in a low-resource setting: A randomized controlled trial.
Agwu, UM; Egbuji, CC; Ekwedigwe, KC; Nwafor, JI, 2020
)
2.72
"Misoprostol is a prostaglandin analog commonly used to induce termination of pregnancy. "( Microcrystalline Cellulose and Crospovidone Identified in Placentas With Vaginal Misoprostol Use.
Bruner, E; Butler, DC; Cuff, R; Page, T; Phillips, A; Presnell, SE, 2020
)
2.23
"Misoprostol given orally is a commonly used labour induction method. "( Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labour.
Aflaifel, N; Cuthbert, A; Haas, DM; Kerr, RS; Kumar, N; Weeks, AD; Williams, MJ, 2021
)
2.42
"Misoprostol is a life-savingmedication in obstetric practice but the prevalence of misoprostol-related self-induced abortion is increasing in many communities."( Incidence of self-induced abortion with misoprostol, admitted to a provincial hospital in Papua New Guinea: A prospective observational study.
Agua, V; Ao, P; Bolnga, JW; Dl Mola, G; Laman, M; Lufele, E; Pomat, W; Teno, M, 2021
)
2.33
"Misoprostol is a non-invasive, effective medical method for completion of abortion in missed abortion."( Misoprostol for medical treatment of missed abortion: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Chen, XW; Marwah, S; Wang, P; Wang, QM; Wu, HL, 2017
)
2.62
"Misoprostol is an alternative to oxytocin and is simpler to use, as it is administered via the oral, buccal, sublingual, rectal and vaginal routes rather than intravenously."( Induction of labour in term premature rupture of membranes; oxytocin versus sublingual misoprostol; a randomised clinical trial.
Eslami Hasan Abadi, S; Motamedi, E; Pourali, L; Saghafi, N; Tara, F; Vatanchi, AM, 2018
)
1.43
"Misoprostol is a synthetic analog of prostaglandin-E1 and it is the most widely used drug for the medical management of incomplete abortion. "( Misoprostol-induced Acute Coronary Syndrome in a Premenopausal Woman: A Case Report with Literature Review.
Akram, S; Mazhar, F; Sultana, J, 2018
)
3.37
"Misoprostol is a common agent that is used to ripen the cervix and induce labor, yet there is no clear evidence of the optimal number of doses needed to achieve a higher rate of vaginal delivery."( Induction of labor using one dose vs multiple doses of misoprostol: a randomized controlled trial.
Arabkhazaeli, M; Bernstein, PS; Kapedani, A; Moon, JY; Pimentel, VM; Tropper, PJ; Wang, A, 2018
)
2.17
"Misoprostol is a safe and effective treatment option for the management of early pregnancy failure."( Success And Safety Of Misoprostol For Treatment Of Early Pregnancy Failure.
Habib, S; Nazir, Q; Noor, MM; Parveen, Z; Sultana, R,
)
1.89
"Misoprostol (MSP) is a prostaglandin E1 analog that has demonstrated a cytoprotective role in the I/R process."( Attenuation of pro-inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress by misoprostol in renal ischemia/reperfusion in rats.
Alarcón-Galván, G; Cantú-Machuca, DV; Cordero-Pérez, P; Cura-Esquivel, I; Delgado-Chávez, EN; Esquivel-Figueroa, D; García-Narro, JH; Garza-Ocañas, L; Moreno-Peña, DP; Muñoz-Espinosa, LE; Torres-González, L, 2018
)
1.44
"Misoprostol with oxytocin is an effective drug-combination for decreasing intra-operative blood loss during cesarian section with clinical superiority to sublingual over rectal route."( Rectal vs. sublingual misoprostol before cesarean section: double-blind, three-arm, randomized clinical trial.
Abdel-Hamid, MM; Abou-Gamrah, AE; El-Sabaa, HA; El-Saied, MM; El-Sayed, MA; Hemeda, H; Mansour, AM; Mohamed, RM; Shawky, ME; Sweed, MS, 2018
)
2.24
"Misoprostol is a life-saving drug in many developing countries for women at risk of post-partum hemorrhaging owing to its affordability, stability, ease of administration and clinical efficacy. "( Crystal structure of misoprostol bound to the labor inducer prostaglandin E
Audet, M; Batyuk, A; Breton, B; Cherezov, V; Gati, C; Han, GW; Hanson, MA; Hu, H; Katritch, V; Liu, W; Lu, Y; Manahan, D; Popov, P; Shui, W; Stevens, RC; Velasquez, J; Weierstall, U; White, KL; Zarzycka, B, 2019
)
2.28
"Misoprostol is a safe and effective drug with low complications for the induction of labor. "( Induction of labor with titrated oral misoprostol solution versus oxytocin in term pregnancy: randomized controlled trial.
Aalami-Harandi, R; Karamali, M; Moeini, A, 2013
)
2.1
"Misoprostol is an effective treatment for early pregnancy failure. "( Efficacy of misoprostol in relation to uterine position in the treatment of early pregnancy failure.
Haas, J; Klaritsch, P; Lang, U; Panzitt, T; Reif, P; Tappauf, C, 2013
)
2.21
"Misoprostol is a promising analog to use for cervical priming before OH."( Cervical priming before diagnostic operative hysteroscopy in infertile women: a randomized, double-blind, controlled comparison of 2 vaginal misoprostol doses.
Bastu, E; Celik, C; Dogan, M; Ergun, B; Nehir, A; Yuksel, B,
)
1.05
"Misoprostol is an appropriate alternative for intravenous oxytocin in patients undergoing cesarean section, with lesser side effects and longer duration of action."( A comparison of rectal misoprostol and intravenous oxytocin on hemorrhage and homeostatic changes during cesarean section.
Fazel, MR, 2013
)
2.14
"Misoprostol is an inexpensive and stable prostaglandin E1 analogue that can be administered orally, vaginally, sublingually or rectally."( Titrated oral misoprostol for augmenting labour to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Dowswell, T; Vogel, JP; West, HM, 2013
)
1.47
"Misoprostol is a synthetic analogue of prostaglandin E1. "( [Pharmacology of misoprostol (pharmacokinetic data, adverse effects and teratogenic effects)].
Aubert, J; Bejan-Angoulvant, T; Jonville-Bera, AP, 2014
)
2.18
"Misoprostol is an orally active prostaglandin. "( Oral misoprostol for induction of labour.
Aflaifel, N; Alfirevic, Z; Weeks, A, 2014
)
2.36
"Misoprostol is a commonly used agent for induction of labor. "( Anaphylaxis to buccal misoprostol for labor induction.
Campbell, S; Kim, C; Maratas, A; Schoen, C, 2014
)
2.16
"Misoprostol is a medicine widely used for both abortion and prevention of postpartum haemorrhage in low income countries."( Social networks and health policy: the case of misoprostol and the WHO model essential medicine list.
Brhlikova, P; Millard, C; Pollock, A, 2015
)
1.4
"Misoprostol is a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analogue which is mainly used for prevention and treatment of gastric ulcers, but also for abortion due to its labour inducing effect. "( Development and validation of LC methods for the separation of misoprostol related substances and diastereoisomers.
Adams, E; Cabooter, D; Eerdekens, F; Hendriks, D; Kahsay, G; Song, H; Tie, Y; Van Schepdael, A, 2015
)
2.1
"Misoprostol is a widely used alternative of prostaglandin for labor induction. "( Evaluating misoprostol content in pregnant women with hourly oral administration during labor induction by microElution solid phase extraction combined with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Chan, TM; Cheng, SY; Hung, CH; Lee, MR, 2015
)
2.25
"Misoprostol is an effective cervical ripening agent."( A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of cervical ripening with misoprostol administration before hysteroscopy.
Jiang, X; Yu, H; Zhuo, Z, 2016
)
2.09
"Misoprostol is a well known abortifacient. "( Foetal fibular hemimelia with focal femoral deficiency following prenatal misoprostol use: A case report.
Begum, J; Ghose, S; Pallavee, P; Samal, R, 2016
)
2.11
"Misoprostol is an important option for PPH management in setting where oxytocin (the gold standard for PPH prevention and treatment) in not available or not feasible to use."( Using Misoprostol for Primary versus Secondary Prevention of Postpartum Haemorrhage - Do Costs Matter?
Chatterjee, S; Rao, KD; Sarkar, A, 2016
)
1.64
"Misoprostol is an effective agent for the induction of labor. "( Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated and 2 hourly static oral misoprostol solution for induction of labor.
Abduljabbar, H; Alamoudi, R; Alkafy, S; Almansouri, N; Alsahly, N; Alsinani, N; Rouzi, AA; Rozzah, R, 2017
)
2.13
"Misoprostol is a pharmacomimetic of PGE(2), an endogenous suppressor of innate immunity."( Misoprostol impairs female reproductive tract innate immunity against Clostridium sordellii.
Aronoff, DM; Brock, TG; Chen, GH; Chung, J; Coleman, N; Flamand, N; Hao, Y; Lewis, C; Peres, CM; Peters-Golden, M; Serezani, CH, 2008
)
2.51
"Misoprostol use is an effective, safe and acceptable method of medical abortion for women."( Misoprostol use as a method of medical abortion.
Bakalianou, K; Botsis, D; Gregoriou, O; Iavazzo, C; Kalmantis, K; Paltoglou, G; Salakos, N, 2008
)
3.23
"Misoprostol is an inexpensive, stable analog of prostaglandin E(1), and is powerful at contracting the uterus."( Misoprostol for the treatment of early pregnancy failure.
Doggrell, SA, 2007
)
2.5
"Misoprostol is a cost-effective maternal mortality intervention for home births. "( Cost-effectiveness of misoprostol and prenatal iron supplementation as maternal mortality interventions in home births in rural India.
Bishai, DM; Sutherland, T, 2009
)
2.11
"Misoprostol is an effective cervical priming agent when administered either orally or vaginally before evacuation of conception in the termination of the first trimester missed miscarriage."( Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening before evacuation of first trimester missed miscarriage.
Jabir, M; Smeet, RI, 2009
)
2.08
"Oral misoprostol is a safe and efficacious alternative to intracervical PGE2 gel in the active management of PROM at term."( Oral misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for active management of premature rupture of membranes at term.
Nagpal, MB; Raghunandan, C; Saili, A, 2009
)
1.38
"Misoprostol is a prostaglandin medication that can be used to induce labour in these situations."( Misoprostol for induction of labour to terminate pregnancy in the second or third trimester for women with a fetal anomaly or after intrauterine fetal death.
Crowther, CA; Dodd, JM, 2010
)
2.52
"Misoprostol is an agent that may ripen the cervix in nonpregnant women. "( Vaginal misoprostol prior to insertion of an intrauterine device: an RCT.
de Groot, CJ; Dekkers, OM; Dijkhuizen, K; Hellebrekers, BW; Helmerhorst, FM; Holleboom, CA; Janssen, CA; van Roosmalen, GJ, 2011
)
2.25
"Misoprostol is a cheap product of prostaglandin E1 which has gained interest in pregnancy termination. "( Low dose vaginal misoprostol versus prostaglandin E2 suppository for early uterine evacuation: a randomized clinical trial.
Mansourfar, M; Mostafa-Gharebaghi, P; Sadeghi-Bazargani, H, 2010
)
2.14
"Misoprostol is an effective cervical ripening agent with favorable outcome and comparable with other inducing agents."( Safety and efficacy of misoprostol for induction of labour.
Chawla, CD; Dongol, AS; Shakya, S, 2010
)
2.11
"Misoprostol-alone regimen is a low-cost regimen as compared to mifepristone/misoprostol regimen. "( Efficacy and safety of mifepristone and buccal misoprostol versus buccal misoprostol alone for medical abortion.
Ahuja, K; Dahiya, K; Dhingra, A; Duhan, N; Nanda, S, 2012
)
2.08
"Oral misoprostol is an effective agent for augmentation of labor."( Oral misoprostol for labor augmentation: a randomized controlled trial.
Alexander, JM; Bleich, AT; Leveno, KJ; Lo, JY; McIntire, DD; Villano, KS, 2011
)
1.4
"Misoprostol is a synthetic analogue of prostaglandin E1 that is administered to women at high doses to induce uterine contractions for early pregnancy termination and at low doses to aid in cervical priming during labor. "( Lack of evidence for neonatal misoprostol neurodevelopmental toxicity in C57BL6/J mice.
Berman, RF; Koenig, CM; Pessah, IN; Qi, L; Walker, CK, 2012
)
2.11
"Misoprostol is an effective and safe uterotonic for the prevention and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). "( Misoprostol for prevention and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage: what do we know? What is next?
Abbas, D; Raghavan, S; Winikoff, B, 2012
)
3.26
"Misoprostol is a viable option for treatment of incomplete abortion at mid-level facilities."( Sublingual [corrected] misoprostol as first-line care for incomplete abortion in Burkina Faso.
Blandine, T; Blum, J; Clotaire, H; Coral, A; Dao, B; Diop, A; Hassane, C; Lankoande, J; Ouattara, AZ, 2012
)
2.13
"Misoprostol is an effective, safe, and acceptable method for treating incomplete abortion. "( Misoprostol as first-line treatment for incomplete abortion at a secondary-level health facility in Nigeria.
Adeyanju, AO; Aremu, OT; Diop, A; Fawole, AO; Winikoff, B, 2012
)
3.26
"Misoprostol is a pharmaceutical synthetic compound, analog of prostaglandin E1, frequently used as an abortifacient in not medically supervised or self-induced abortions, particularly in countries with restrictive abortion laws representing a serious public health problem. "( Validated method for the determination of misoprostol acid in whole blood by ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
Ajenjo, AC; Dias, MJ; Simões, SS, 2012
)
2.09
"Misoprostol is a prostaglandin E(1) analogue that has been used for medical abortion. "( Early pregnancy termination with vaginal misoprostol before and after 42 days gestation.
Dalkalitsis, NA; Kalantaridou, SN; Papanikolaou, EG; Paraskevaidis, EA; Plachouras, NI; Tsanadis, GD; Zikopoulos, KA, 2002
)
2.02
"Misoprostol is a cheap, effective drug for second-trimester pregnancy termination with short induction abortion intervals but a higher rate of side effects."( Second-trimester pregnancy termination: comparison of three different methods.
Al-Hussaini, TK; Habib, DM; Makarem, MH; Makhlouf, AM, 2003
)
1.04
"Misoprostol is an important medication for gynecologic practice; however, it is not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for any gynecologic indication. "( Misoprostol in gynecology.
Carusi, DA; Goldberg, AB; Meckstroth, KR, 2003
)
3.2
"Misoprostol is a prostaglandin E1 analog originally intended for use to prevent NSAID-induced gastric ulcers. "( Misoprostol: a quarter century of use, abuse, and creative misuse.
Arulkumaran, S; Chong, YS; Su, LL, 2004
)
3.21
"Misoprostol is a superior agent over oxytocin on the induction of term labour, but its application might increase the risk of precipitous labour, abnormal uterine contractions or meconium stained amniotic fluid. "( Misoprostol in labour induction of term pregnancy: a meta-analysis.
Fang, L; Li, K; Li, XM; Shi, ZJ; Wan, J; Xu, CF; Zhang, Y, 2004
)
3.21
"Misoprostol is an effective agent for pre-operative cervical priming before surgical termination of pregnancy in the first trimester. "( A randomized study comparing the use of sublingual to vaginal misoprostol for pre-operative cervical priming prior to surgical termination of pregnancy in the first trimester.
Ho, PC; Mok, KH; Tang, OS, 2004
)
2.01
"Misoprostol is an effective treatment for incomplete abortion. "( Two regimens of misoprostol for treatment of incomplete abortion.
Blanchard, K; Kiriwat, O; Mavimbela, N; Sirimai, K; Svirirojana, N; Taneepanichskul, S; Winikoff, B, 2004
)
2.11
"Misoprostol is a synthetic prostaglandin E1 used during the first trimester of pregnancy as an adjacent to RU486 for medical termination of pregnancy. "( Misoprostol overdose during the first trimester of pregnancy.
Bentov, Y; Katz, M; Sheiner, E, 2004
)
3.21
"Misoprostol is a prostaglandin E1 analogue marketed for use in the prevention of peptic ulcer disease. "( [Induction of labour at term with misoprostol: an effective, safe and inexpensive alternative].
Diedrich, K; Schröder, AK; Tauchert, S, 2004
)
2.05
"Misoprostol is an effective and safe treatment for chronic tinnitus in hypertensive and/or diabetic patients. "( Efficacy of misoprostol in the treatment of tinnitus in patients with diabetes and/or hypertension.
Akkuzu, B; Cakmak, O; Ozluoglu, LN; Yilmaz, I, 2004
)
2.15
"Misoprostol is a low cost, easy to use technology that can control PPH even without a medically trained attendant."( Controlling postpartum hemorrhage after home births in Tanzania.
Campbell, M; Mbaruku, G; Potts, M; Prata, N; Vahidnia, F, 2005
)
1.77
"Misoprostol, which is a prostaglandin E1 analogue, is effectively used in cervical priming in women both for labor induction and for gynecological procedures. "( Priming effect of misoprostol on estrogen pretreated cervix in postmenopausal women.
Atmaca, R; Burak, F; Germen, AT; Kafkasli, A, 2005
)
2.1
"Misoprostol is a synthetic prostaglandin currently employed to induce labor. "( Neonatal morbidity and outcome of live born premature babies after attempted illegal abortion with misoprostol.
Cunha, M; Escumalha, M; Gouveia, C; Machado, MC; Vale, F,
)
1.79
"Misoprostol is an effective and safe agent for induction of labor in women with term premature rupture of membranes. "( Misoprostol for labor induction in women with term premature rupture of membranes: a meta-analysis.
Carver, AR; Case, AS; Lin, MG; Nuthalapaty, FS; Ramsey, PS, 2005
)
3.21
"Misoprostol (Cytotec) is a synthetic analogue of PGE1, not yet registered for Obstetric practice. "( [Misoprostol and induction of labour].
Porozhanova, K; Porozhanova, V; Sampat, D, 2005
)
2.68
"Oral Misoprostol is an effective method of induction of delivery with low Bishop Score. "( [Misoprostol and induction of labour].
Porozhanova, K; Porozhanova, V; Sampat, D, 2005
)
1.75
"Misoprostol appears to be a safe, inexpensive, and effective uterotonic for use in rural and remote areas, where intravenous oxytocin may be unavailable."( Oral misoprostol versus oxytocin in the management of the third stage of labour.
Crane, JMG; Hutchens, D; Matthews, K; Parsons, SM; Walley, RL, 2006
)
1.57
"Misoprostol is a synthetic prostaglandin that can be given orally or vaginally. "( Oral misoprostol for induction of labour.
Alfirevic, Z; Weeks, A, 2006
)
2.29
"Misoprostol is a synthetic prostaglandin E(1) analogue that is commonly used for medical abortion. "( The pharmacokinetics and different regimens of misoprostol in early first-trimester medical abortion.
Ho, PC; Tang, OS, 2006
)
2.03
"Misoprostol is a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analogue, with properties of a mucosal cytoprotectant."( Use of topical misoprostol to reduce radiation-induced mucositis: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Cakir, B; Foroudi, F; Gebski, V; Sathiyaseelan, Y; Timms, I; Tiver, KW; Veness, MJ, 2006
)
1.41
"Misoprostol is an effective and safe treatment for early pregnancy failure and could replace surgical curettage in over two-thirds of the patients. "( A randomized prospective study of misoprostol or mifepristone followed by misoprostol when needed for the treatment of women with early pregnancy failure.
Dulitzky, M; Goldenberg, M; Machtinger, R; Schiff, E; Seidman, DS; Soriano, D; Stockheim, D; Wiser, A, 2006
)
2.06
"Misoprostol is a commonly used prostaglandin to induce labour. "( Misoprostol compared with prostaglandin E2 for labour induction in women at term with intact membranes and unfavourable cervix: a systematic review.
Butler, B; Crane, JM; Hannah, ME; Young, DC, 2006
)
3.22
"Misoprostol is a synthetic analogue of prostaglandin E1 that is known to attenuate the inflammatory process and promote collagen formation by inhibiting IL-1 and TNF. "( An investigation of misoprostol in the promotion of wound healing.
Evans, R; Fales-Williams, A; Mason, DR; Nieves, MA; Vandervoort, JM, 2006
)
2.1
"Misoprostol is a strong contender in this respect."( Two regimens of vaginal misoprostol in second trimester termination of pregnancy: a prospective randomised trial.
Bhattacharyya, SK; Hazra, A; Kamilya, GS; Mukherji, J; Ray, S, 2006
)
1.36
"Misoprostol is an important drug in obstetrics and gynecology because of its uterotonic and cervical-ripening activities. "( Maternal death related to misoprostol overdose.
Ferreira, H; Graça, LM; Henriques, A; Lourenço, AV; Ribeirinho, A, 2007
)
2.08
"Misoprostol is a prostaglandin E(1) analogue that is effective, cheap and easily stored but not licensed for this use in Australia."( Misoprostol to induce labour: a review of its use in a NSW hospital.
Davis, GK; Homer, CS; Miller, TD; Roberts, LM, 2007
)
2.5
"Misoprostol is a safe drug but serious complications and teratogenicity can occur with unsupervised use."( Misoprostol: pharmacokinetic profiles, effects on the uterus and side-effects.
Gemzell-Danielsson, K; Ho, PC; Tang, OS, 2007
)
2.5
"Misoprostol is a synthetic prostaglandin analog administered vaginally to induce labor for intrauterine death or termination of pregnancy for congenital abnormalities. "( Misoprostol associated refractile material in fetal and placental tissues after medical termination of pregnancy.
Ho, V; Keating, S; Kingdom, J; Shannon, P, 2007
)
3.23
"Misoprostol is a safe medication for both mother and baby."( [Vaginal application of misoprostol for labor induction after 36 weeks of pregnancy].
Godinjak, Z; Imsirija, L; Imsirija, N, 2007
)
1.37
"Misoprostol is an effective agent for first trimester medical termination."( Misoprostol and first trimester pregnancy termination.
Galazios, G; Grapsas, X; Liberis, V; Tsikouras, P; Vassaras, G; Vlachos, G, 2008
)
3.23
"Misoprostol (SC-29333) is a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analog that has been found to be a potent inhibitor of gastric secretion in animals. "( Inhibition of nocturnal gastric secretion in normal human volunteers by misoprostol: a synthetic prostaglandin E1 methyl ester analog.
Agrawal, N; Akdamar, K; Ertan, A, 1982
)
1.94
"Oral misoprostol is an effective and safe method for cervical dilatation prior to vacuum aspiration in first trimester pregnancy."( Oral misoprostol versus placebo for cervical dilatation before vacuum aspiration in first trimester pregnancy.
Ho, PC; Lao, T; Ma, HK; Ngai, SW; Tang, OS, 1995
)
1.26
"Misoprostol is a prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) analog used for the prevention of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced ulceration."( Acid secretion during indomethacin therapy. Effect of misoprostol.
Chey, WY; Scheiman, JM; Taylor, SD, 1995
)
1.26
"Misoprostol seems to be a drug with many potential uses apart from the treatment of gastric and duodenal ulcers. "( Intravaginal misoprostol for termination of midtrimester pregnancy.
Lim, JM; Raman, S; Soh, EB, 1995
)
2.1
"Misoprostol was found to be an effective, inexpensive and safe agent for preoperative cervical treatment."( Predilatation of the cervix before suction curettage for therapeutic abortion in early pregnancy.
Aitken, RE; Begg, AF; Edwards, D; MacKay, PM; Marchant, RM, 1994
)
1.01
"Misoprostol is a synthetic analogue of prostaglandin E1 which has been used in the healing of ulcers and prevention of peptic ulcers in patients taking NSAIDs."( Cytoprotection with misoprostol: use in the treatment and prevention of ulcers.
Ballinger, A,
)
1.18
"Misoprostol (MSP) is a synthetic prostaglandin E1 methyl analogue indicated for the prevention of gastric ulcers induced by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). "( Embryotoxic effects of misoprostol in the mouse.
Chahoud, I; de-Carvalho, RR; Magalhães-de-Souza, CA; Paumgartten, FJ, 1995
)
2.04
"Oral misoprostol is an effective agent for cervical priming and labor induction in patients with pre-labor rupture of membranes at term."( Cervical priming with oral misoprostol in pre-labor rupture of membranes at term.
Ho, PC; Lao, T; Ngai, SW; To, WK, 1996
)
1.1
"Misoprostol is a prostaglandin analogue which has uterotonic properties. "( The use of misoprostol for termination of early pregnancy.
Koopersmith, TB; Mishell, DR, 1996
)
2.13
"Misoprostol is a prostaglandin E1 analogue which reduces both gastric ulcerations and clinically important bleeding in patients taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). "( Use of misoprostol in the elderly: is the expense justified?
Johannesson, M; Liang, MH; Stucki, G, 1996
)
2.19
"Misoprostol is a prostaglandin E1 analogue with oral bioavailability and immunosuppressive properties."( Misoprostol with cyclosporin A prolongs corneal allograft survival in an animal model.
Gothard, TW; Holland, EJ; Olsen, TW, 1996
)
2.46
"Misoprostol is an effective, easy to use, apparently safe and cheap drug for the induction of labour."( Induction of labour with intravaginal misoprostol in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.
Koch, MA; Merrell, DA, 1995
)
2
"Misoprostol is an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction, but it causes an increase in cesarean deliveries associated with uterine hyperstimulation."( A randomized comparison between misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction in patients with unfavorable cervices.
Arias, F; Buser, D; Mora, G, 1997
)
2.02
"Misoprostol is a prostaglandin analogue with uterotonic properties. "( The use of misoprostol for termination of early pregnancy.
Carbonell, JL; Fernández, C; Varela, L; Velazco, A, 1997
)
2.13
"Misoprostol is an effective agent for cervical ripening and induction of labor. "( Vaginal misoprostol for term labor induction.
Bauer, TA; Brown, DL; Chai, LK, 1997
)
2.17
"Misoprostol is an effective, easy to use, safe and cheap drug for termination of second trimester pregnancy. "( Second-trimester termination of pregnancy by extra-amniotic prostaglandin F2alpha or endocervical misoprostol. A comparative study.
El Helw, BA; Ghorab, MN, 1998
)
1.96
"Misoprostol is an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction when used in a judicious and cautious fashion."( Labor induction with misoprostol.
Wing, DA, 1999
)
1.34
"Misoprostol is a most promising, cheap, and effective agent, which does not need cool storage like other prostaglandins."( Use of misoprostol in first and second trimester abortion: a review.
Scheepers, HC; van den Bergh, AS; van Erp, EJ, 1999
)
1.48
"Misoprostol was reported to be an effective agent for cervical ripening and induction of labor. "( The effect of vaginal pH on the efficacy of vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor.
Bildirici, I; Gunalp, S, 2000
)
2
"Misoprostol is a synthetic prostaglandin which has been used to induce labour. "( Oral misoprostol for induction of labour with a viable fetus.
Alfirevic, Z; Gaussmann, A; Howarth, G, 2000
)
2.26
"Misoprostol was found to be a safe and effective agent for cervical ripening as part of labor induction."( Use of misoprostol for cervical ripening.
Carpenter, ME; Dean, CA; Farmer, RM; Katz, VL, 2000
)
2.2
"Misoprostol is a synthetic prostaglandin which has been used to induce labour. "( Oral misoprostol for induction of labour.
Alfirevic, Z, 2000
)
2.26
"Misoprostol (Cytotec), is an oral prostaglandin E analogue."( Misoprostol induces relaxation of human corpus cavernosum smooth muscle: comparison to prostaglandin E1.
Kim, NN; Moreland, RB; Nehra, A; Parulkar, BG; Traish, A, 2000
)
2.47
"Misoprostol is an orally active uterotonic agent."( A multicentre randomized controlled trial of oral misoprostol and i.m. syntometrine in the management of the third stage of labour.
Chan, AS; Cheung, KB; Ng, PS; Sin, WK; Tang, LC; Yuen, PM, 2001
)
1.29
"Oral misoprostol is an effective method for labour induction in the third trimester. "( Oral misoprostol for induction of labour.
Alfirevic, Z, 2001
)
1.34
"Misoprostol is a prostaglandin E1 analogue. "( [New developments in labor induction].
Bar, J; Hod, M; Yulzari-Roll, V, 2002
)
1.76
"Misoprostol is a highly effective medication for the induction of labor in comparison to prostaglandin E1 or oxytocin. "( [New developments in labor induction].
Bar, J; Hod, M; Yulzari-Roll, V, 2002
)
1.76
"Misoprostol is an important and efficient medication in obstetrics for cervical ripening and induction of labor. "( [New developments in labor induction].
Bar, J; Hod, M; Yulzari-Roll, V, 2002
)
1.76
"Misoprostol is a stable, orally active synthetic analogue of prostaglandin E, which is used for the prophylaxis and treatment of peptic ulcer. "( Induction of abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol in early pregnancy.
Baird, DT; Thong, KJ, 1992
)
1.99
"Misoprostol is a synthetic analogue of naturally occurring prostaglandin E1. "( Misoprostol--a logical therapeutic approach to gastroduodenal mucosal injury induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs?
Fenn, GC; Robinson, GC, 1991
)
3.17
"Misoprostol (Cytotec) is a recently released prostaglandin E1 analog approved for use in prevention of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastropathy. "( Acute misoprostol toxicity.
Graber, DJ; Meier, KH, 1991
)
2.2
"Misoprostol is a synthetic 15-deoxy-16-hydroxy-16-methyl analog of PGE1, and the first prostaglandin to be registered for the treatment of peptic ulcer disease. "( Misoprostol: discovery, development, and clinical applications.
Collins, PW,
)
3.02
"Misoprostol is a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analogue that inhibits gastric acid production and may augment mucosal defense. "( Misoprostol reduces gastroduodenal injury from one week of aspirin: an endoscopic study.
Jiranek, GC; Kimmey, MB; Saunders, DR; Shanahan, W; Silverstein, FE; Willson, RA, 1989
)
3.16
"Misoprostol is a synthetic analogue of natural prostaglandin E1."( Misoprostol: a prostaglandin E1 analogue.
Garris, RE; Kirkwood, CF, 1989
)
2.44
"Misoprostol is a potent inhibitor of basal acid secretion and moderately inhibits histamine-stimulated acid secretion with a duration of action of at least three hours following drug ingestion."( Effects of misoprostol on histamine-related gastric secretion in man.
Wilson, DE; Wilson, PC, 1989
)
1.39
"Misoprostol is an E1 prostaglandin analog. "( Overview of misoprostol clinical experience.
Herting, RL; Nissen, CH, 1986
)
2.09
"Misoprostol, which is a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analog, was found to significantly decrease the histological damage to the bladder from cyclophosphamide."( Evaluation of misoprostol cytoprotection of the bladder with cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan) therapy.
Engelmann, UH; Fishman, IJ; Gray, KJ; Johnson, EH, 1986
)
1.35
"Misoprostol is an analogue of prostaglandin E1 and is the first synthetic prostaglandin analogue to be made available for the treatment of peptic ulcer disease. "( Misoprostol. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of peptic ulcer disease.
Clissold, SP; Monk, JP, 1987
)
3.16
"Misoprostol acts as a selective EP1-agonist, and has little or no DP, FP, IP and TP activity."( The action of prostanoid receptor agonists and antagonists on smooth muscle and platelets.
Eglen, RM; Whiting, RL, 1988
)
1
"Misoprostol is a new therapeutical alternative for the treatment of duodenal ulcer patients."( [Misoprostol and cimetidine in the treatment of active duodenal ulcer. Multicenter, double-blind, clinico-endoscopic study. The Argentine experience].
Baccaro, JC; González del Solar, C; Laudanno, O; Mauro, E; Mazure, PA; Pardo, R; Pulpeiro, A; Rubio, H; Tomatis, H, 1987
)
1.9
"Misoprostol is a synthetic prostaglandin which is related structurally to naturally occurring prostaglandin E1 (PGE1). "( Chemistry and synthetic development of misoprostol.
Collins, PW; Dajani, EZ; Pappo, R, 1985
)
1.98

Effects

Misoprostol has a high effective rate of induction of labour in HDP patients and is an effective uterotonic agent in reducing PPH. It is contraindicated for women in early pregnancy.

Oral misoprostol at low doses has been found to be a safe and effective agent for labour induction in numerous studies carried out in the developed world. It has powerful uterotonic effects and, because it is well absorbed orally and sublingually, could be used more widely than would be possible with injectable uterotonics alone.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Misoprostol has a high effective rate of induction of labour in HDP patients and is an effective uterotonic agent in reducing PPH. "( Effects of Misoprostol on Induction of Labour in Patients with Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Meta-Analysis.
Gao, M; Liu, S; Liu, T; Song, G; Wang, L, 2022
)
2.55
"Misoprostol has a wide range of applications in obstetrics and gynaecology. "( Sublingual misoprostol and hyperpyrexia: case report with temperature curve.
Minkande, JZ; Tolefac, PN, 2017
)
2.29
"Misoprostol has a potent inhibitory effect on the activation of cells derived from the site of nasal mucosal inflammation, regardless of sensitivity to aspirin."( Lack of association between aspirin-triggered 15-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid release and mast cell/eosinophil activation in nasal polyps from aspirin-sensitive patients.
Jankowski, A; Jarzebska, M; Jedrzejczak-Czechowicz, M; Kowalski, ML; Lewandowska-Polak, A; Makowska, JS, 2011
)
1.09
"Misoprostol has a number of advantages over other prostaglandin preparations."( Induction of abortion in the second trimester by a combination of misoprostol and mifepristone: a randomized comparison between two misoprostol regimens.
el-Refaey, H; Templeton, A, 1995
)
1.25
"Misoprostol has an important role as an abortifacient among the women studied."( Misoprostol and illegal abortion in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Costa, SH; Vessey, MP, 1993
)
2.45
"Misoprostol has an uterotonic effect and it is contraindicated for women in early pregnancy."( Induction of abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol in early pregnancy.
Baird, DT; Thong, KJ, 1992
)
1.17
"Misoprostol has a high effective rate of induction of labour in HDP patients and is an effective uterotonic agent in reducing PPH. "( Effects of Misoprostol on Induction of Labour in Patients with Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Meta-Analysis.
Gao, M; Liu, S; Liu, T; Song, G; Wang, L, 2022
)
2.55
"Misoprostol has during the past few years become an important obstetric drug used for different purposes both within and outside hospitals in Tanzania. "( Beyond the law: Misoprostol and medical abortion in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Blystad, A; Kahabuka, C; Moland, KM; Pembe, AB; Solheim, IH, 2020
)
2.35
"Misoprostol has been shown to elicit a dose-dependent effect on myometrial contractility, which may affect rates of uterine tachysystole in clinical practice."( The role of prostaglandins E1 and E2, dinoprostone, and misoprostol in cervical ripening and the induction of labor: a mechanistic approach.
Bakker, R; Myers, D; Pierce, S, 2017
)
1.42
"Misoprostol has a wide range of applications in obstetrics and gynaecology. "( Sublingual misoprostol and hyperpyrexia: case report with temperature curve.
Minkande, JZ; Tolefac, PN, 2017
)
2.29
"Misoprostol has advantages in being cheap and stable at room temperature and available in resource-poor settings."( Labor Induction with Orally Administrated Misoprostol: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Akerud, H; Darj, E; Gemzell-Danielsson, K; Jarnbert-Pettersson, H; Stenson, D; Wallstrom, T; Wiberg-Itzel, E, 2017
)
1.44
"Misoprostol has been identified as a safe, inexpensive, easily administered option for the induction of labor, with satisfactory results. "( Misoprostol administered sublingually at a dose of 12.5 μg versus vaginally at a dose of 25 μg for the induction of full-term labor: a randomized controlled trial protocol.
da Silva Junior, JR; de Amorim, MMR; Feitosa, FE; Gattás, DSMB; Souza, ASR, 2018
)
3.37
"Misoprostol has been widely used in Obstetrics and Gynecology for cervical priming, medical abortion and induction of labour. "( Efficacy and Safety of Intravaginal Misoprostol for Mid-trimester Medical Termination of Pregnancy.
Akhter, N; Arzoo, S; Ferdous, B; Yousuf, S, 2018
)
2.2
"Misoprostol abortion has significantly increased over time, and was associated with less morbidity and need for further treatment, in this study. "( Trends in misoprostol use and abortion complications: A cross-sectional study from nine referral hospitals in Nigeria.
Awonuga, D; Awowole, I; Bello, FA; Fabamwo, A; Fawole, B; Ganatra, B; Guest, P; Irinyenikan, T; Loto, O; Oluborode, B, 2018
)
2.33
"Misoprostol has been shown to be an effective alternative to surgical evacuation and can be offered by lower level clinicians."( Results from a study using misoprostol for management of incomplete abortion in Vietnamese hospitals: implications for task shifting.
Blum, J; Dung, DL; Hai, PT; Ngoc, NT; Nhan, TT; Shochet, T; Winikoff, B, 2013
)
1.41
"Misoprostol has been widely used in Obstetrics and Gynecology; however, its usefulness and efficacy in facilitating IUD insertion in nulligravidas have yet to be established. "( Misoprostol prior to inserting an intrauterine device in nulligravidas: a randomized clinical trial.
Amorim, MM; Costa, AA; Scavuzzi, A; Souza, AS, 2013
)
3.28
"Misoprostol has the major public health advantage over injectable medication that it can more easily be distributed at community level."( Postpartum misoprostol for preventing maternal mortality and morbidity.
Gülmezoglu, AM; Hofmeyr, GJ; Lawrie, TA; Novikova, N, 2013
)
1.5
"Misoprostol has proven to be effective at stimulating uterine contractions although it can have serious, and even life-threatening side-effects."( Titrated oral misoprostol for augmenting labour to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Dowswell, T; Vogel, JP; West, HM, 2013
)
1.47
"Misoprostol has become a popular over the counter self-administered abortifacient in Ghana. "( Severe morbidities associated with induced abortions among misoprostol users and non-users in a tertiary public hospital in Ghana.
Damalie, FJ; Dassah, ET; Morhe, ES; Nakua, EK; Opare-Addo, HS; Tagbor, HK, 2014
)
2.09
"Misoprostol has preventive effect against NSAID-induced intestinal diseases."( [Preventive effect of misoprostol against nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced enteropathy in mice].
Jin, J; Liu, Z; Wu, F; Xiao, Z; Xie, X; Zhou, H, 2015
)
2.17
"Misoprostol has advantages according to neonatal outcome compared to administration of dinoprostone."( The effectiveness of misoprostol or dinoprostone in neonatal outcome after labour induction in post-term nulliparas.
Ammari, A; Galazios, G; Liberis, A; Liberis, V; Pinidis, P; Soilemetzidis, M; Tsagias, N; Tsikouras, P, 2015
)
2.18
"Oral misoprostol at low doses has been found to be a safe and effective agent for labour induction in numerous studies carried out in the developed world, where there are better resources for monitoring of labour."( EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF 2-HOURLY 20 MCG ORAL MISOPROSTOL SOLUTION COMPARED TO STANDARD INTRAVENOUS OXYTOCIN IN LABOUR INDUCTION DUE TO PRE-LABOUR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM: A RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL AT KENYATTA NATIONAL HOSPITAL.
Kamau, K; Karanja, JG; Mbaluka, CM; Mugo, N, 2014
)
1.11
"Misoprostol (MP) has gained considerable interest as a reactive oxygen species scavenger in recent years."( Protective role of misoprostol against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity.
Bayram, A; Doğan, M; Kaya, A; Özcan, İ; Polat, H; Şenel, F; Yaşar, M, 2016
)
1.48
"Misoprostol has been associated with adverse side effects and severe outcomes for mother and child and is not registered for obstetric use in Denmark."( Quality assessment of patient leaflets on misoprostol-induced labour: does written information adhere to international standards for patient involvement and informed consent?
Clausen, JA; Juhl, M; Rydahl, E, 2016
)
1.42
"Misoprostol consistently has been shown to cause more pain and cramping than placebo, but is an effective adjunct to osmotic dilators after 16 weeks."( Update on second-trimester surgical abortion.
Lerma, K; Shaw, KA, 2016
)
1.16
"Misoprostol has powerful uterotonic effects and, because it is well absorbed orally and sublingually, has the potential to be used more widely than would be possible with injectable uterotonics alone."( Misoprostol for the prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage.
Gülmezoglu, AM; Hofmeyr, GJ, 2008
)
2.51
"Misoprostol has limited data supporting its use in this setting."( Cervical dilation in second-trimester abortion.
Fox, MC; Hayes, JL, 2009
)
1.07
"Misoprostol has no negative impact on the incidence and severity of late rectal bleeding, in contrast to acute rectal bleeding."( Effect of a prostaglandin--given rectally for prevention of radiation-induced acute proctitis--on late rectal toxicity. Results of a phase III randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study.
Christiansen, H; Hermann, RM; Herrmann, MK; Hess, CF; Hille, A; Kertesz, T; Pradier, O; Schmidberger, H; Zapf, A, 2009
)
1.07
"Misoprostol has some other advantages like long shelf -life, stability at room temperature and oral use."( The effect of sublingual misoprostol versus intravenous oxytocin in reducing bleeding after caesarean section.
Doroodian, M; Eftekhari, N; Lashkarizadeh, R, 2009
)
1.38
"Misoprostol therapy has been found to be effective when administered orally or vaginally, although vaginal therapy is slightly superior."( [The use of a synthetic analog of prostaglandin E1 for medical treatment of first trimester pregnancy failure].
Hagay, Z; Houminer, A; Kopernic, G, 2009
)
1.07
"Misoprostol has been studied intensively to produce cervical dilatation. "( Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study on the effect of misoprostol on ease of consecutive insertion of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.
Anttila, AM; Gemzell-Danielsson, K; Heikinheimo, O; Hurskainen, R; Inki, P; Kunz, M; Olsson, SE; Parmhed, S, 2010
)
2.04
"Misoprostol has been used for induction of labor either as a cervical ripening agent or as an abortifacient. "( Use of misoprostol for pregnancy termination in women with prior classical cesarean delivery: a report of 3 cases.
Malapati, R; Nguyen, TM; Villaluna, G,
)
2.03
"Misoprostol has some important advantages, such as easy application, very low price, and greater acceptability by doctors and patients."( Cervical ripening prior to hysteroscopy: is the application of misoprostol useful?
Affronti, G; Arena, S; Zupi, E, 2011
)
1.33
"Misoprostol has been shown to be an effective agent for cervical ripening and termination of early pregnancy especially when administered vaginally. "( Effect of bacterial vaginosis on the pharmacokinetics of misoprostol in early pregnancy.
Fiala, C; Gemzell-Danielsson, K; Sandström, A; Schweer, H; Sioutas, A; Watzer, B, 2012
)
2.07
"Many misoprostol regimens have been used to treat early pregnancy loss as an alternative to surgical evacuation, with differing adverse event and success rates."( The management of missed miscarriage in an outpatient setting: 800 versus 600 μg of vaginal misoprostol.
Abad, L; Barceló, F; De Paco, C; López-Espín, JJ; Parrilla, JJ; Silva, Y, 2012
)
1.11
"Misoprostol has a potent inhibitory effect on the activation of cells derived from the site of nasal mucosal inflammation, regardless of sensitivity to aspirin."( Lack of association between aspirin-triggered 15-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid release and mast cell/eosinophil activation in nasal polyps from aspirin-sensitive patients.
Jankowski, A; Jarzebska, M; Jedrzejczak-Czechowicz, M; Kowalski, ML; Lewandowska-Polak, A; Makowska, JS, 2011
)
1.09
"Misoprostol has long been approved to prevent and treat stomach ulcers."( The mifepristone-misoprostol regimen for early medical abortion.
Ellertson, C; Waldman, SN, 2001
)
1.37
"Only Misoprostol 800ug/day has been directly shown to reduce the risk of ulcer complications such as perforation hemorrhage or obstruction."( Prevention of NSAID-induced gastroduodenal ulcers.
Dube, C; Jolicoeur, E; McGowan, J; Rostom, A; Tugwell, P; Welch, V; Wells, G, 2002
)
0.77
"Misoprostol has been used for achieving cervical priming before suction evacuation (SE) by the oral or vaginal route, although both routes have their shortcomings. "( Comparison between the sublingual and oral route of misoprostol for pre-abortion cervical priming in first trimester abortions.
Salhan, S; Sarda, N; Saxena, P, 2004
)
2.02
"Misoprostol has proven to be a very convenient and flexible drug because of its formulation as a tablet that is stable and that can be administered orally, rectally, vaginally and by the sublingual route."( Misoprostol: a quarter century of use, abuse, and creative misuse.
Arulkumaran, S; Chong, YS; Su, LL, 2004
)
2.49
"Oral misoprostol (100 microg) has similar efficacy to vaginal PGE2 tablets, and may be an option to consider for term labour induction."( A randomised comparison of oral misoprostol and vaginal prostaglandin E2 tablets in labour induction at term.
Acharya, S; Danielian, P; Livingstone, I; Rice, P; Shetty, A; Templeton, A, 2004
)
1.12
"Misoprostol has uterotonic properties that have led to its occasional off-label use in the treatment of postpartum hemorrhage, by rectal or sublingual administration, as an alternative to sulprostone."( [Misoprostol for treating postpartum hemorrhages].
Berhoune, M; Bertrand, E; Chiadmi, F; Cisternino, S; Fontan, JE; Godard, C; Schlatter, J; Toledano, A, 2008
)
1.98
"Misoprostol has been shown to be effective for cervical priming in non-pregnant women prior to hysteroscopy."( Cervical priming with sublingual misoprostol prior to insertion of an intrauterine device in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial.
Aronsson, A; Gemzell-Danielsson, K; Marions, L; Sääv, I; Stephansson, O, 2007
)
1.34
"Misoprostol has been shown to increase colonic activity and decrease colonic transit time in chronic constipation patients."( Does postoperative misoprostol use induce intestinal motility? A prospective randomised double-blind trial.
Demiraran, Y; Demirci, F; Gul, OB; Gul, OK; Ozdemir, I; Somunkiran, A, 2007
)
2.11
"Misoprostol has been used for the induction of labor since 1987."( Misoprostol for induction of labor with a live fetus.
Alfirevic, Z; Faúndes, A; Hofmeyr, GJ; Safar, P; Weeks, A; Wing, D, 2007
)
2.5
"Misoprostol has gastrin antisecretory properties, but no cytoprotective effects against acute, taurocholate-induced mucosal damage in man."( Bile salt-induced, acute gastric mucosal damage in man: time course and effect of misoprostol, a PGE1-analogue.
Blum, AL; Fimmel, CJ; Müller-Lissner, SA, 1984
)
1.21
"Misoprostol has a number of advantages over other prostaglandin preparations."( Induction of abortion in the second trimester by a combination of misoprostol and mifepristone: a randomized comparison between two misoprostol regimens.
el-Refaey, H; Templeton, A, 1995
)
1.25
"Misoprostol has many advantages over the more widely investigated synthetic prostaglandin, gemeprost."( Intravaginal misoprostol for termination of midtrimester pregnancy.
Lim, JM; Raman, S; Soh, EB, 1995
)
1.28
"Misoprostol has an important role as an abortifacient among the women studied."( Misoprostol and illegal abortion in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Costa, SH; Vessey, MP, 1993
)
2.45
"Misoprostol has not been compared to omeprazole in this situation."( Cytoprotection with misoprostol: use in the treatment and prevention of ulcers.
Ballinger, A,
)
1.18
"Misoprostol has additional advantages of being widely available and inexpensive."( Oral misoprostol versus mifepristone for cervical dilatation before vacuum aspiration in first trimester nulliparous pregnancy: a double blind prospective randomised study.
Ho, PC; Lao, T; Ngai, SW; Yeung, KC, 1996
)
1.53
"Misoprostol has some uterine effects but it is not effective in inducing abortion."( [Determinants of induced abortion among poor women admitted to hospitals in a locality of northeastern Brazil].
Correia, LL; Fonseca, W; Misago, C; Oliveira, FC; Parente, JA, 1996
)
1.02
"Misoprostol has also been shown to decrease NSAID-associated gastrointestinal (GI) complications by 40% compared with placebo."( Agents used in the prevention and treatment of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated symptoms and ulcers.
Isenberg, J; Scheiman, J, 1998
)
1.02
"Misoprostol has been widely applied in early pregnancy termination and term pregnancy induction. "( Precipitate delivery and postpartum hemorrhage after term induction with 200 micrograms misoprostol.
Chang, CC; Hsieh, YY; Hsu, TY; Tsai, HD; Yang, TC; Yeh, LS, 2000
)
1.97
"Misoprostol has now largely replaced other prostaglandin analogues in the regimen, and this has made medical abortion simpler and more cost effective."( Research on regimens for early medical abortion.
von Hertzen, H, 2000
)
1.03
"Only Misoprostol 800ug/day has been directly shown to reduce the risk of ulcer complications."( Prevention of chronic NSAID induced upper gastrointestinal toxicity.
Dube, C; McGowan, J; Rostom, A; Tugwell, P; Welch, V; Wells, G, 2000
)
0.76
"Misoprostol has great potential for use in the third stage of labour especially in developing countries."( A double-blind placebo controlled randomised trial of misoprostol and oxytocin in the management of the third stage of labour.
Crane, JM; Hutchens, D; Matthews, K; Sawyer, E; Walley, RL; Wilson, JB, 2000
)
1.28
"Only Misoprostol 800ug/day has been directly shown to reduce the risk of ulcer complications."( Prevention of NSAID-induced gastroduodenal ulcers.
Dube, C; McGowan, J; Rostom, A; Tugwell, P; Welch, V; Wells, G, 2000
)
0.76
"Misoprostol has utility in acetaminophen and ethanol hepatotoxicity, hepatitis, and fibrosis."( Misoprostol therapeutics revisited.
Davies, NM; Jamali, F; Longstreth, J, 2001
)
2.47
"Oral misoprostol has similar efficacy as vaginal misoprostol but is associated with a higher frequency of excessive uterine contractility and intervention."( Safety and efficacy of misoprostol orally and vaginally: a randomized trial.
Blust, D; Bouldin, S; Carlan, SJ; O'Brien, WF, 2001
)
1.14
"Misoprostol has potential in reducing the high incidence of PPH in developing countries."( Misoprostol versus oxytocin in the third stage of labor.
Kundodyiwa, TW; Majoko, F; Rusakaniko, S, 2001
)
2.47
"Misoprostol has an uterotonic effect and it is contraindicated for women in early pregnancy."( Induction of abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol in early pregnancy.
Baird, DT; Thong, KJ, 1992
)
1.17
"Misoprostol has been associated with adverse reactions, including gastrointestinal symptoms, gynecologic problems, and headache. "( Delirium in an elderly woman possibly associated with administration of misoprostol.
Morton, MR; Robbins, ME, 1991
)
1.96
"Misoprostol has been shown to be an effective agent for the prevention of NSAID-induced gastric ulcers."( Misoprostol: a prostaglandin E1 analogue.
Garris, RE; Kirkwood, CF, 1989
)
2.44
"Misoprostol has shown a dose-related antisecretory effect that lasted 3-5.5 hr."( Overview of misoprostol clinical experience.
Herting, RL; Nissen, CH, 1986
)
1.37
"Misoprostol (Cytotec) has received government approval for marketing in 12 countries, since the first gave its approval in June, 1984."( Focus on misoprostol: review of worldwide safety data.
Wildeman, RA, 1987
)
1.41
"Misoprostol has been evaluated in healthy subjects for both antisecretory and pharmacological activity. "( Misoprostol clinical pharmacology. Establishment of activity in man.
Steiner, JA, 1985
)
3.15

Actions

Misoprostol can cause excessive uterine activity and uterine rupture. The misoprostl group had lower modified Bishop scores, higher BMIs, and a higher rate of fetal scalp blood testing.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Misoprostol did not increase or decrease maternal mortality."( Postpartum misoprostol for preventing maternal mortality and morbidity.
Gülmezoglu, AM; Hofmeyr, GJ; Lawrie, TA; Novikova, N, 2013
)
1.5
"Misoprostol may cause vaginal spotting, which may impair the vision during hysteroscopy especially just after the menstrual period."( Comparison of sublingual misoprostol with lidocaine spray for pain relief in office hysteroscopy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Baser, E; Esin, S; Kucukozkan, T; Okuyan, E,
)
1.16
"Misoprostol may suppress the allergen absorption facilitated by aspirin."( Intestinal absorption of lysozyme, an egg-white allergen, in rats: kinetics and effect of NSAIDs.
Hamura, K; Matsuo, H; Yokooji, T, 2013
)
1.11
"The misoprostol group had lower modified Bishop scores, higher BMIs, and a higher rate of fetal scalp blood testing."( Initial clinical experience with a misoprostol vaginal insert in comparison with a dinoprostone insert for inducing labor.
Allerstorfer, C; Mayer, RB; Oppelt, P; Pömer, J; Shebl, O; Weiss, C, 2016
)
1.19
"Misoprostol did not produce any damage to the stomach."( Comparison of antinociceptive efficacy and gastroprotection between celecoxib and diclofenac plus misoprostol in rats.
Déciga-Campos, M; Granados-Soto, V; Medina-Santillan, R; Reyes-García, G, 2007
)
1.28
"Misoprostol did not increase the side-effect profile and patient acceptability was superior to expectant management."( A randomized controlled trial comparing medical and expectant management of first trimester miscarriage.
Bagratee, JS; Kagoro, H; Khullar, V; Moodley, J; Regan, L, 2004
)
1.04
"Misoprostol can cause excessive uterine activity and uterine rupture."( Uterine rupture during induction of labor at term with intravaginal misoprostol.
Bennett, BB, 1997
)
1.98
"Misoprostol may increase the risk of uterine rupture in the patient with a scarred uterus. "( Uterine rupture associated with the use of misoprostol in the gravid patient with a previous cesarean section.
Lubarsky, SL; Plaut, MM; Schwartz, ML, 1999
)
2.01
"Misoprostol users had lower 3rd-stage estimated blood loss and needed less further ecbolics compared to O-E group."( The use of rectal misoprostol as active pharmacological management of the third stage of labor.
Diab, KM; Ramy, AR; Yehia, MA, 1999
)
1.36

Treatment

Misoprostol treatment of uncomplicated second trimester incomplete abortion was equally and highly acceptable to women when care was provided by midwives compared with physicians. Misoprostl posttreatment decreased brain lesi.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Misoprostol treatment of uncomplicated second trimester incomplete abortion was equally and highly acceptable to women when care was provided by midwives compared with physicians. "( Evaluating women's acceptability of treatment of incomplete second trimester abortion using misoprostol provided by midwives compared with physicians: a mixed methods study.
Atuhairwe, S; Atuyambe, L; Byamugisha, J; Gemzell-Danielsson, K; Hanson, C; Ssenyonga, R; Tumwesigye, NM, 2022
)
2.38
"Misoprostol treatment results may be improved by pre-treatment with mifepristone; its effectiveness has already been proven for other indications of pregnancy termination."( Mifepristone and misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for uterine evacuation after early pregnancy failure: study protocol for a randomized double blinded placebo-controlled comparison (Triple M Trial).
Coppus, SF; Hamel, CC; Snijders, MP; van den Berg, J; Vandenbussche, FP, 2019
)
1.57
"Misoprostol treatment was successful in 80.0% (73/91)."( Predictors of complete miscarriage after expectant management or misoprostol treatment of non-viable early pregnancy in women with vaginal bleeding.
Fernlund, A; Jokubkiene, L; Sladkevicius, P; Valentin, L, 2020
)
1.52
"Misoprostol as treatment for non-viable pregnancy in primary care is an acceptable alternative for women and health care professionals. "( [Treatment for non-viable pregnancy in primary care].
Garritsen, M; Hamstra, L; Hollander, M; Jaspers, R; Segers, C; van Dillen, J, 2021
)
2.06
"Misoprostol is first-line treatment for medically induced abortion."( [Cardiac arrest induced by vasospastic angina pectoris after vaginally administered misoprostol].
Bosselmann, HS; Lidegaard, Ø; Matthesen, T; Olsen, RH, 2017
)
1.4
"Misoprostol alone (treatment A), misoprostol plus oxytocin (treatment B), and oxytocin alone (treatment C) were administered in 9.3%, 19.9%, and 70.8% of the cases, respectively. "( Misoprostol use under routine conditions for termination of pregnancies with intrauterine fetal death.
Alvarez, FS; Cunha, Ade A; Nascimento, MI; Nunes, GG; Oliveira, SR; Villas Bôas, EL,
)
3.02
"Misoprostol treatment, for women with first trimester missed abortion and favorable reproductive history, is an acceptable treatment with no detrimental effect on future fertility."( Misoprostol treatment for early pregnancy failure does not impair future fertility.
Anteby, EY; Bord, I; Gdalevich, M; Meltcer, S; Nahum, R; Orvieto, R, 2014
)
3.29
"Misoprostol posttreatment decreased brain lesion volume, edema, and brain atrophy and improved long-term functional outcomes."( PGE2 receptor agonist misoprostol protects brain against intracerebral hemorrhage in mice.
Cao, W; Chen, W; Dong, X; Gao, Y; Hua, W; Qi, J; Wang, J; Wu, H; Wu, T; Yang, Q; Zhao, X; Zhou, J, 2015
)
1.45
"The misoprostol treatment dose-dependently improved spatial learning and memory function as well as healing after hippocampal neuron damage induced by chronic aluminum-overload in rats."( Misoprostol Reverse Hippocampal Neuron Cyclooxygenase-2 Downstream Signaling Imbalance in Aluminum-Overload Rats.
Guo, Y; Hu, X; Ji, C; Lei, W; Wang, J; Wei, Y; Yang, J, 2016
)
2.36
"Misoprostol-treated cervical tissue demonstrated more endothelial claudin-5 and occludin, whilst expression of GJs were unchanged."( Prostaglandin-induced cervical remodelling in humans in the first trimester is associated with increased expression of specific tight junction, but not gap junction proteins.
Anumba, DO; Galimberti, A; Ghulé, VV; Gray, C, 2012
)
1.1
"Misoprostol treatment resulted in a somewhat lower chance of success than standard surgical practice (RR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.89-0.92)."( Sublingual misoprostol versus standard surgical care for treatment of incomplete abortion in five sub-Saharan African countries.
Abiola, OM; Blandine, T; Bukola, F; Dao, B; Diop, A; Gaye, A; Nayama, M; Olayinka, O; Sall, AB; Shochet, T; Winikoff, B, 2012
)
1.49
"Misoprostol treatment for early pregnancy failure is highly successful in select women, primarily those with active bleeding and nulliparity. "( Factors related to successful misoprostol treatment for early pregnancy failure.
Barnhart, K; Creinin, MD; Gilles, JM; Huang, X; Westhoff, C; Zhang, J, 2006
)
2.07
"Misoprostol treatment for early pregnancy failure had similar success, acceptability, and complications in women with and without previous uterine surgery."( Misoprostol for treatment of early pregnancy failure in women with previous uterine surgery.
Barnhart, K; Chen, BA; Creinin, MD; Gilles, JM; Reeves, MF; Westhoff, C; Zhang, J, 2008
)
3.23
"Misoprostol treatment was associated with a significantly reduced prevalence of reactive gastritis and it is suggested that this, along with its antisecretory action, may explain the reduced prevalence of gastroduodenal lesions when coadministered with NSAIDs."( Effect of longterm misoprostol coadministration with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a histological study.
Bardhan, KD; Bjarnason, I; Fenn, CG; Price, AB; Shah, K; Talbot, IC, 1995
)
1.34
"Misoprostol-treated rats were found to have a similar tumour incidence and staging compared with control animals."( The effect of misoprostol on colon cancer.
Adams, WJ; Lawson, JA; Morris, DL, 1994
)
1.37
"Misoprostol treatment resulted in a significant reduction in the extent of indomethacin-induced antral ulceration, but ranitidine had no effect."( Characterization of a simple animal model for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug induced antral ulcer.
McKnight, GW; Wallace, JL, 1993
)
1.01
"Misoprostol treatment did not affect the occurrence of Helicobacter pylori or the rheumatic disease activity."( Helicobacter pylori infection, ABO blood group, and effect of misoprostol on gastroduodenal mucosa in NSAID-treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Henriksson, K; Nord, CE; Sandstedt, B; Uribe, A, 1993
)
1.25
"The misoprostol/aspirin-treated group had significantly (P < 0.05) less gastroduodenal hemorrhage and ulceration and a significantly (P < 0.05) lower prevalence of vomiting than did the control group."( Use of synthetic prostaglandin E1 (misoprostol) for prevention of aspirin-induced gastroduodenal ulceration in arthritic dogs.
Boudrieau, RJ; Labato, MA; Matz, ME; Murtaugh, RJ, 1993
)
1.04
"Misoprostol treatment had a significant effect on the improvement of stomach mucosal injury."( Effect of misoprostol on the course of viral hepatitis B.
Flisiak, R; Prokopowicz, D,
)
1.26
"Misoprostol treatment resulted in a significant (p < 0.05) risk reduction of gastric ulcer in the short-term (pooled RD = 13.3%; 95% confidence interval -25.7%, -0.9%) and in the long-term (RD = -8.4%; 95% confidence interval -17.7%, -1.0%) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug treatment."( Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug gastropathy: clinical results with misoprostol.
Koch, M, 1999
)
1.26
"In misoprostol-treated groups the baseline cervical dilatation was significantly increased when compared with the placebo group; the effect was dose-related in the oral but not in the vaginal group."( The use of misoprostol for pre-operative cervical dilatation prior to vacuum aspiration: a randomized trial.
Chan, YM; Ho, PC; Ngai, SW; Tang, OS, 1999
)
1.21
"Misoprostol treatment blocked PG-PS-induced IL-1alpha and MPO and inhibited the potentiating effect of indomethacin on MPO and IL-1alpha (P < 0.05)."( Low endogenous prostaglandin E2 predisposes to relapsing inflammation in experimental rat enterocolitis.
Argenzio, RA; Kandil, HM; Sartor, RB, 1999
)
1.02
"Misoprostol treatment did not increase pain score on the day of IUI (1.1 versus 1.4) and at 1 day post IUI (0.6 versus 0.8)."( Vaginal misoprostol enhances intrauterine insemination.
Brown, SE; Gibbons, WE; Oehninger, S; Schnorr, JA; Toner, JP; Williams, SC, 2001
)
1.47
"In misoprostol treated group patients required less analgetics then in oxytocin treated group."( [Comparison of vaginal misoprostol and oxytocin for labor induction in post-term pregnancy].
Florjański, J; Heimrath, J; Myszczyszyn, G; Pajak, J; Tomiałowicz, M; Woytoń, J; Zalewski, J, 2001
)
1.14
"Misoprostol-treated rats had glomerular filtration rates almost threefold greater than control animals, although renal blood flow and renal vascular resistance were not significantly different."( Prostaglandins protect kidneys against ischemic and toxic injury by a cellular effect.
Manivel, JC; Paller, MS, 1992
)
1
"Misoprostol treatment significantly reduced interstitial edema and acinar cell lesions induced by hyperstimulation."( Protective effect of misoprostol, a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analog, on cerulein-induced acute pancreatitis in rats.
Balas, D; Bertrand, C; Bouisson, M; Buscail, L; Bussenot, I; Ribet, A; Sénégas-Balas, F; Vaysse, N, 1990
)
1.32
"Misoprostol treatment was demonstrated to be clearly superior to placebo in respect of reduction of gastroduodenal lesions and gastrointestinal pain."( [Therapy of non-steroidal antirheumatic drug-induced gastrointestinal lesions with misoprostol].
Bach, GL; Hüdepohl, M; Stock, KP,
)
1.08
"Misoprostol treatment resulted in a 36% increase in stomach weight (p less than 0.01) and a 30% increase in the length (measured as the cell column count from the base/neck junction to the surface) of the fundic gastric glands (p less than 0.01)."( Prostaglandins and the gastric epithelium: effects of misoprostol on gastric epithelial cell proliferation in the dog.
Allen, JL; Goodlad, RA; Levin, S; Madgwick, AJ; Moffatt, MR; Wright, NA, 1989
)
1.25
"Misoprostol treatment significantly reduced body weight gain."( Effect of chronic misoprostol ingestion on rat gastric morphology and cell turnover.
Arber, N; Fich, A; Okon, E; Rachmilewitz, D; Zajicek, G, 1988
)
1.33
"Treatment with misoprostol leads to an incomplete evacuation of the uterus and additional surgical treatment in 20-50% of women."( Factors influencing women's preferences for subsequent management in the event of incomplete evacuation of the uterus after misoprostol treatment for miscarriage.
Ankum, WM; Hentzen, JEKR; Lemmers, M; Mol, BWJ; van Wely, M; Verschoor, MA, 2017
)
1
"Treatment with misoprostol/phenytoin was associated with delayed epithelialization and wound maturation in comparison with contralateral untreated wounds."( Effect of a Misoprostol/Phenytoin Gel on Experimentally Induced Wounds in Brook Trout-A Preliminary Study.
Coutant, T; Lair, S; Vergneau-Grosset, C, 2019
)
1.23
"Treatment with misoprostol was found to have no clinically significant beneficial effect among women with retained placenta."( A randomized controlled trial on the value of misoprostol for the treatment of retained placenta in a low-resource setting.
Fauteck, H; Lotgering, FK; Pembe, AB; Tarimo, V; van Beekhuizen, HJ, 2013
)
1
"Treatment with misoprostol significantly increases the rates of adequate colposcopic examinations (odds ratio [OR] = 6.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.94-15.61). "( Vaginal Misoprostol for Overcoming Inadequate Colposcopies: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Pergialiotis, V; Perrea, D; Pitsouni, E; Vlachos, DE; Vlachos, GD, 2015
)
1.2
"Treatment with misoprostol significantly attenuated the MPP(+)-induced mitochondrial membrane permeability change that leads to the increase in pro-apoptotic Bax and Cytochrome c levels, and subsequent caspase-3 activation."( Prostaglandin analogue misoprostol attenuates neurotoxin 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium-induced mitochondrial damage and cell death in differentiated PC12 cells.
Choi, EJ; Han, JH; Lee, CS, 2008
)
1
"Treatment with misoprostol (12.5, 25, and 50 microg/kg) has been started in separated groups, 30 min and 2 days before carrageenan injection and it was given twice a day (total of five doses) by orogastric route."( Effect of misoprostol and indomethacin on cyclooxygenase induction and eicosanoid production in carrageenan-induced air pouch inflammation in rats.
Buluç, M; Gürdal, H; Melli, M, 2002
)
1.06
"Treatment by misoprostol without mifepristone during the second and third trimesters makes it possible to terminate a pregnancy easily and quickly without significant complications."( Second and third medical termination of pregnancy with misoprostol without mifepristone.
David, E; Firtion, C; Haberstich, R; Langer, BR; Peter, C,
)
0.75
"Rats treated with misoprostol before and after APAP administration showed reduced OCT and ALT levels at 36 hr of overdose (454 +/- 446 IU/liter and 2571 +/- 2944 IU/liter, respectively) compared to those without misoprostol treatment (1348 +/- 480 IU/liter and 6077 +/- 3025 IU/liter, respectively, P < 0.01)."( Misoprostol protection against acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity in the rat.
Andrews, FJ; Lim, SP; O'Brien, PE, 1994
)
2.05
"Pretreatment with misoprostol significantly reduced the amount of force required to dilate the cervix to 8 mm from 103.7 Newtons in controls to 40.0 Newtons in women treated with misoprostol."( Oral misoprostol for cervical priming in non-pregnant women.
Chan, YM; Ho, PC; Liu, KL; Ngai, SW, 1997
)
1.13
"Co-treatment with misoprostol prevented the leftward shift, and treatment with misoprostol alone did not cause a leftward shift."( Effect of misoprostol on myocardial contractility in rats treated with cyclosporin A.
Banijamali, HS; Benediktsson, H; Paul, LC; ter Keurs, HE; ter Keurs, MH, 1998
)
1.03
"Treatment with misoprostol can reduce the demand for surgical evacuation in cases of spontaneous abortion, and its use is associated with fewer medical complications."( Spontaneous abortion: a randomized, controlled trial comparing surgical evacuation with conservative management using misoprostol.
Chang, AM; Cheung, LP; Chung, TK; Haines, CJ; Lee, DT, 1999
)
0.87
"Pre-treatment with misoprostol used alone resulted in a lower cervical resistance than isosorbide mononitrate alone (18.5N vs 39N, P = 0.04, Mann-Whitney U test)."( A comparison of isosorbide mononitrate, misoprostol and combination therapy for first trimester pre-operative cervical ripening: a randomised controlled trial.
Greer, IA; Ledingham, MA; Lunan, CB; Norman, JE; Thomson, AJ, 2001
)
0.9
"Pretreatment with misoprostol or indomethacin did not affect the minimum volume obtained compared with control period [misoprostol: 5.8 (1.4) ml; indomethacin 5.9 (1.3) ml)]."( Effect of indomethacin and misoprostol on fasted gallbladder volume and meal-induced gallbladder contractility in humans.
Hawkey, CJ; Murray, FE; Stinchcombe, SJ, 1992
)
0.9
"Treatment with misoprostol combined with an H2RA resulted in 60% success for ulcer healing within the next 2 months in nonresponders, without affecting the intraluminal pH measured during treatment with an H2RA alone."( H2-receptor antagonist-refractory ulcer: its pathophysiology and treatment.
Arakawa, T; Fukuda, T; Higuchi, K; Kobayashi, K; Nakamura, H, 1991
)
0.62
"Pretreatment with misoprostol, but not with antacid, significantly and dose-dependently reduced the gastric mucosal injury."( Misoprostol but not antacid prevents endotoxin-induced gastric mucosal injury: role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha.
Agrawal, N; Dajani, EZ; Mahatma, M; Nakamura, C; Nelson, S; Sitton, J, 1991
)
2.05
"Treatment with misoprostol was associated with a significant improvement in renal function as judged by the mean (+/- SEM) serum creatinine concentration (128 +/- 7 vs."( Prevention of acute graft rejection by the prostaglandin E1 analogue misoprostol in renal-transplant recipients treated with cyclosporine and prednisone.
Bartkus, C; Jonasson, O; Ketel, B; Maddux, MS; Moran, M; Mozes, MF; Pollak, R; Veremis, S; Wallemark, C, 1990
)
0.85
"Treatment with misoprostol and omeprazole lowered the ulcer index significantly compared with controls."( The effect of misoprostol, omeprazole and sucralfate on nicotine- and ethanol-induced gastric injury and gastric mucosal blood flow: a comparative study.
Chen, BW; Cho, CH; Hui, WM; Lam, SK; Luk, CT,
)
0.83
"Pretreatment with misoprostol limited alcohol-induced injury to superficial erosion of epithelial cells."( Evaluation of cytoprotection against ethanol-induced injury in gastric mucosa pretreated with misoprostol, cimetidine, or placebo.
Letourneau, RJ; Liss, RH; Schepis, JP, 1986
)
0.81

Toxicity

Misoprostol, a Prostaglandin E1 analogue has been found to be safe and effective in treatment of early pregnancy failure. Compared with NSAID use alone, the concomitant use of NSAID plus misoprostols is associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular adverse events.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The five most commonly reported adverse events were abdominal pain by 23."( Overall safety of Arthrotec.
Geis, GS, 1992
)
0.28
"Gastrointestinal symptoms have been the most frequently reported adverse experiences in the misoprostol (Cytotec) studies of both patients with peptic ulcer disease, and healthy subjects."( Focus on misoprostol: review of worldwide safety data.
Wildeman, RA, 1987
)
0.91
" In both groups, the most frequently reported adverse events were gastrointestinal in nature, with abdominal pain reported most frequently (in 22."( Review of the safety of diclofenac/misoprostol.
Gagnier, P, 1993
)
0.56
" The lack of significant adverse effects has revealed a degree of tolerability that, to write a review of the adverse effects, poses a difficult task."( A comparative overview of the adverse effects of antiulcer drugs.
Piper, DW, 1995
)
0.29
" These findings show that this treatment regimen is a safe and effective alternative to surgical abortion or the use of antiprogestins and prostaglandins for medical abortion."( Methotrexate and misoprostol for early abortion: a multicenter trial. I. Safety and efficacy.
Creinin, MD; Darney, PD; Keder, L; Tiller, G; Vittinghoff, E, 1996
)
0.63
" Estimates of the total cost of prescribing NSAIDs to the elderly must include the additional costs of gastroprotective agents, prophylaxis, laboratory monitoring, physician evaluations and interventions for adverse effects."( NSAIDs and the elderly. Toxicity and economic implications.
Phillips, AC; Polisson, RP; Simon, LS, 1997
)
0.3
" In all sites, both medical failures (an adverse effect resulting in a medically indicated surgical intervention) and acceptability failures (failure to complete the entire regimen) contributed substantially to the gross failure rates for medical abortion."( Safety, efficacy, and acceptability of medical abortion in China, Cuba, and India: a comparative trial of mifepristone-misoprostol versus surgical abortion.
Cabezas, E; Coyaji, KJ; Du, MK; Ellertson, C; Eschen, A; Gu, S; Krishna, UR; Sivin, I; Winikoff, B; Xiao, B, 1997
)
0.51
"Intravaginal misoprostol is a safe drug for labor induction with superior effectiveness compared with intravaginal prostaglandin E2."( A double-blind comparison of the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 to induce labor.
Boesiger, H; Hoesli, I; Holzgreve, W; Pavic, N; Surbek, DV, 1997
)
0.9
"To summarize current evidence that three new additions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) offer comparable efficacy with fewer adverse effects than established NSAIDs."( Newer, safer nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Rational NSAID selection for arthritis.
Bensen, W; Zizzo, A, 1998
)
0.3
"Using misoprostol in conjunction with traditional NSAIDs reduces gastric and renal adverse effects."( Newer, safer nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Rational NSAID selection for arthritis.
Bensen, W; Zizzo, A, 1998
)
0.78
"Intravaginal misoprostol may be an effective and safe cervical ripening agent in late pregnancy."( [Safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening in the third trimester of pregnancy].
Li, W; Ouyang, W; Wang, Z, 1997
)
0.94
"Although serious adverse events of early abortion have been studied, little attention has been paid to the more common side effects experienced by early medical or surgical abortion clients."( Side effects of mifepristone-misoprostol abortion versus surgical abortion. Data from a trial in China, Cuba, and India.
Coyaji, K; Ellertson, C; Elul, B; Winikoff, B, 1999
)
0.59
" Types of adverse events were similar for all treatment groups, with GI adverse events predominating."( Comparison of the upper gastrointestinal safety of Arthrotec 75 and nabumetone in osteoarthritis patients at high risk for developing nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastrointestinal ulcers.
Agrawal, NM; Ball, J; Bocanegra, TS; Caldwell, J; Dhadda, S; Hancock, L; Hurley, S; Kivitz, AJ; Weaver, AL, 1999
)
0.3
"Compared with prostaglandin E2, misoprostol is more effective in cervical ripening and induction of labor, is as safe for patients who do not have a history of cesarean birth, may carry a higher incidence of uterine rupture, and should not be used for patients attempting vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery."( Comparison of the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol (prostaglandin E1) with those of dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2) for cervical ripening and induction of labor in a community hospital.
Blanchette, HA; Erasmus, S; Nayak, S, 1999
)
0.84
" In some countries where safe abortion is neither accessible nor legal, even unsupervised, off-protocol use of misoprostol can provide women with a means to safely terminate pregnancy."( Opening a door to safe abortion: international perspectives on medical abortifacient use.
Pine, RN; Pollack, AE, 2000
)
0.52
" NSAIDs may also increase blood pressure and have adverse effects on renal function."( Prospects for changing the burden of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug toxicity.
Griffin, MR; Scheiman, JM, 2001
)
0.31
" No adverse neonatal outcomes were noted."( Safety and efficacy of misoprostol orally and vaginally: a randomized trial.
Blust, D; Bouldin, S; Carlan, SJ; O'Brien, WF, 2001
)
0.62
" However, attention should be paid in clinical practice to the rare, but severe adverse events caused by this treatment."( [Side effect of mifepristone in combination with misoprostol for medical abortion].
Jiang, S; Lei, ZW; Li, Q; Li, YP; Lü, L; Zou, Y, 2004
)
0.58
"To evaluate the efficacy of treatment strategies to reduce clinically significant gastrointestinal adverse effects associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)."( Reducing clinically significant gastrointestinal toxicity associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs.
Jacobsen, RB; Phillips, BB, 2004
)
0.32
"Clinically significant upper gastrointestinal adverse events, such as ulcers and ulcer complications, associated with NSAIDs are a cause of significant morbidity and mortality in the US."( Reducing clinically significant gastrointestinal toxicity associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs.
Jacobsen, RB; Phillips, BB, 2004
)
0.32
"COX-2 inhibitors and proton-pump inhibitors are effective and well-tolerated therapies to reduce clinically significant upper gastrointestinal adverse events associated with NSAIDs."( Reducing clinically significant gastrointestinal toxicity associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs.
Jacobsen, RB; Phillips, BB, 2004
)
0.32
" Although its use for hysteroscopy facilitates the procedure versus placebo, it entails a higher frequency of adverse events."( [Efficacy and safety of misoprostol in obstetrics].
Bermejo Vicedo, T; Capilla Montes, C,
)
0.44
" Designing and conducting further clinical trials to investigate appropriate dosage and administration routes, as well as the drug s adverse effect profile under such circumstances is essential, and would potentially allow an application for approval to be filed with health authorities regarding its use in obstetric practice."( [Efficacy and safety of misoprostol in obstetrics].
Bermejo Vicedo, T; Capilla Montes, C,
)
0.44
"5 million adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports for 8620 drugs/biologics that are listed for 1191 Coding Symbols for Thesaurus of Adverse Reaction (COSTAR) terms of adverse effects."( Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
Benz, RD; Contrera, JF; Kruhlak, NL; Matthews, EJ; Weaver, JL, 2004
)
0.32
"Misoprostol and oxytocin both appear to be safe and efficacious for use in inductions of labor in twins in this limited retrospective investigation."( Is misoprostol safe for labor induction in twin gestations?
Bush, MC; Csaba, A; Eddleman, KA; Saphier, CJ, 2006
)
2.4
" The overall adverse event rate was 19."( Adequacy and safety of buccal misoprostol for cervical preparation prior to termination of second-trimester pregnancy.
Cullins, V; Gatter, M; Momtaz, MR; Morfesis, J; Patel, A; Pelta, M; Piotrowski, H; Talmont, E, 2006
)
0.62
"There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of general characteristics, uterine contractility, and fetal well-being during labor, cesarean section rates, perinatal outcomes, or maternal adverse events."( Effectiveness and safety of a new vaginal misoprostol product specifically labeled for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Calderon, IM; Cecatti, JG; Faúndes, A; Pires, HM; Tedesco, RP, 2006
)
0.6
"The results showed that the 25-microg vaginal tablets of misoprostol were as effective and safe for cervical ripening and labor induction as the dose-equivalent fraction of 200-microg oral tablets."( Effectiveness and safety of a new vaginal misoprostol product specifically labeled for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Calderon, IM; Cecatti, JG; Faúndes, A; Pires, HM; Tedesco, RP, 2006
)
0.84
"To increase access to safe abortion in rural India, the feasibility and acceptability of mifepristone-misoprostol abortion was assessed in a typical government run primary health center (PHC) in Nagpur district, Maharashtra State, that does not offer surgical abortion services and must refer off-site for emergency and backup services."( Increasing access to safe abortion services in rural India: experiences with medical abortion in a primary health center.
Anand, A; Elul, B; Kalyanwala, S; Mundle, S; Ughade, S, 2007
)
0.55
" This study suggests that introduction of medical abortion at lower levels of the health-care system could increase access to safe abortion in rural India."( Increasing access to safe abortion services in rural India: experiences with medical abortion in a primary health center.
Anand, A; Elul, B; Kalyanwala, S; Mundle, S; Ughade, S, 2007
)
0.34
" Acceptability and satisfaction ratings were similar and high for both misoprostol and MVA, with three out of four women indicating that the treatment's adverse effects were tolerable (misoprostol = 72."( Is misoprostol a safe, effective and acceptable alternative to manual vacuum aspiration for postabortion care? Results from a randomised trial in Burkina Faso, West Africa.
Blum, J; Dao, B; Lankoande, J; Ouedraego, M; Raghavan, S; Thieba, B; Winikoff, B, 2007
)
1.19
"Six hundred micrograms of oral misoprostol is as safe and acceptable as MVA for the treatment of incomplete abortion."( Is misoprostol a safe, effective and acceptable alternative to manual vacuum aspiration for postabortion care? Results from a randomised trial in Burkina Faso, West Africa.
Blum, J; Dao, B; Lankoande, J; Ouedraego, M; Raghavan, S; Thieba, B; Winikoff, B, 2007
)
1.25
"Misoprostol - a stable prostaglandin E1 analogue- is effective and safe in the induction of labour."( Efficacy and safety of misoprostol in induction of labour in a Nigerian tertiary hospital.
Abdul, MA; Ibrahim, UN; Musa, H; Yusuf, MD,
)
1.88
"In a health care delivery system with an annual delivery rate of approximately 220,000, a comprehensive redesign of patient safety process was undertaken based on the following principles: (1) uniform processes and procedure result in an improved quality; (2) every member of the obstetric team should be required to halt any process that is deemed to be dangerous; (3) cesarean delivery is best viewed as a process alternative, not an outcome or quality endpoint; (4) malpractice loss is best avoided by reduction in adverse outcomes and the development of unambiguous practice guidelines; and (5) effective peer review is essential to quality medical practice yet may be impossible to achieve at a local level in some departments."( Improved outcomes, fewer cesarean deliveries, and reduced litigation: results of a new paradigm in patient safety.
Belfort, MA; Byrum, SL; Clark, SL; Meyers, JA; Perlin, JB, 2008
)
0.35
" Vaginal Misoprostol 25 microg 4-hourly is safe and effective for induction of labour with shorter induction to delivery interval."( Prospective randomised controlled trial to compare safety and efficacy of intravaginal Misoprostol with intracervical Cerviprime for induction of labour with unfavourable cervix.
Aggarwal, N; Krithika, KS; Suri, V, 2008
)
0.99
"Women on Web is a service that uses telemedicine to help women access mifepristone and misoprostol in countries with no safe care for termination of pregnancy (TOP)."( Using telemedicine for termination of pregnancy with mifepristone and misoprostol in settings where there is no access to safe services.
Davies, S; Gemzell-Danielsson, K; Gomperts, RJ; Jelinska, K; Kleiverda, G, 2008
)
0.8
"The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of serious adverse events (SAEs) occurring during early second trimester surgical abortion performed following the use of misoprostol alone for cervical preparation."( Serious adverse events associated with the use of misoprostol alone for cervical preparation prior to early second trimester surgical abortion (12-16 weeks).
Gatter, M; Nucatola, D; Roth, N; Saulsberry, V, 2008
)
0.79
"Vaginal Misoprostol appears to be safe and effective for cervical ripening in 3rd Trimester."( Effectiveness and safety of vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour in unfavourable cervix in 3rd trimester.
Abbasi, N; Bilal, SA; Danish, N; Parveen, Z; Shakoor, F,
)
0.84
" Three serious adverse events occurred and women accessed emergency services appropriately."( Efficacy, acceptability and safety of medication abortion in low-income, urban Latina women.
Harken, T; Sheeder, J; Teal, SB; Westhoff, C, 2009
)
0.35
"Medication abortion can be a very appealing, safe and effective option in low-income, non-English-speaking populations."( Efficacy, acceptability and safety of medication abortion in low-income, urban Latina women.
Harken, T; Sheeder, J; Teal, SB; Westhoff, C, 2009
)
0.35
" The 2 groups reported similar adverse effects."( Feasibility, efficacy, safety, and acceptability of mifepristone-misoprostol for medical abortion in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.
Choe, YS; Jang, MC; Kim, OS; Ko, WS; Pyo, HS; Tran, NT, 2010
)
0.6
"The high efficacy and acceptability of medical abortion among rural and urban women suggest that medical abortion is a safe alternative to surgical abortion and can be scaled up to other reproductive health clinics in both rural and urban areas of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, provided that there is appropriate training and supervision."( Feasibility, efficacy, safety, and acceptability of mifepristone-misoprostol for medical abortion in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.
Choe, YS; Jang, MC; Kim, OS; Ko, WS; Pyo, HS; Tran, NT, 2010
)
0.6
" Misoprostol at the community level is a safe intervention."( Community-based availability of misoprostol: is it safe?
Grossman, AA; Holston, M; Hsieh, K; Mbaruku, G; Prata, N, 2009
)
1.55
"To explore the policy implications of increasing access to safe abortion in Nigeria and Ghana, we developed a computer-based decision analytic model which simulates induced abortion and its potential complications in a cohort of women, and comparatively assessed the cost-effectiveness of unsafe abortion and three first-trimester abortion modalities: hospital-based dilatation and curettage, hospital- and clinic-based manual vacuum aspiration (MVA), and medical abortion using misoprostol (MA)."( Cost-effectiveness analysis of unsafe abortion and alternative first-trimester pregnancy termination strategies in Nigeria and Ghana.
Adanu, R; Blanchard, K; Goldie, SJ; Grossman, D; Hu, D; Levin, C, 2010
)
0.52
" We assessed whether early fi rst-trimester medical abortion provided by midlevel providers (government-trained, certified nurses and auxiliary nurse midwives) was as safe and effective as that provided by doctors in Nepal."( Can midlevel health-care providers administer early medical abortion as safely and effectively as doctors? A randomised controlled equivalence trial in Nepal.
Baird, DT; Huong, NT; Meirik, O; Shah, I; Tamang, A; Thapa, K; Wang, D; Warriner, IK, 2011
)
0.37
"To determine the risks of short term adverse events in adolescent and older women undergoing medical abortion."( Comparison of rates of adverse events in adolescent and adult women undergoing medical abortion: population register based study.
Gissler, M; Heikinheimo, O; Hemminki, E; Mentula, M; Niinimäki, M; Suhonen, S, 2011
)
0.37
"Incidence of adverse events (haemorrhage, infection, incomplete abortion, surgical evacuation, psychiatric morbidity, injury, thromboembolic disease, and death) among adolescent (<18 years) and older (≥ 18 years) women through record linkage of Finnish registries and genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections detected concomitantly with abortion and linked with data from the abortion register for 2004-6."( Comparison of rates of adverse events in adolescent and adult women undergoing medical abortion: population register based study.
Gissler, M; Heikinheimo, O; Hemminki, E; Mentula, M; Niinimäki, M; Suhonen, S, 2011
)
0.37
" The incidence of adverse events among adolescents was similar or lower than that among the adults."( Comparison of rates of adverse events in adolescent and adult women undergoing medical abortion: population register based study.
Gissler, M; Heikinheimo, O; Hemminki, E; Mentula, M; Niinimäki, M; Suhonen, S, 2011
)
0.37
"The incidence of adverse events after medical abortion was similar or lower among adolescents than among older women."( Comparison of rates of adverse events in adolescent and adult women undergoing medical abortion: population register based study.
Gissler, M; Heikinheimo, O; Hemminki, E; Mentula, M; Niinimäki, M; Suhonen, S, 2011
)
0.37
"Home-based abortion is safe under the conditions in place in the included studies."( Comparative effectiveness, safety and acceptability of medical abortion at home and in a clinic: a systematic review.
Free, C; Ngo, TD; Park, MH; Shakur, H, 2011
)
0.37
" The use of misoprostol as an abortifacient agent is considered to be safe since it rarely causes serious side effects."( [Developmental toxicity of misoprostol: an update].
Cavieres, MF, 2011
)
1.05
"03), whereas success rate, interval from drug administration to more favorable cervix and delivery, proportion of patients delivered vaginally within 12 hours and 24 hours, need for oxytocin augmentation, cesarean delivery rate, maternal adverse effects and complications, and neonatal outcome were not significantly different (P>0."( Comparison of the efficacy and safety of titrated oral misoprostol and a conventional oral regimen for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Changnoi, A; Phattanachindakun, B; Russameecharoen, K; Thaisomboon, A; Wanitpongpan, P, 2012
)
0.63
" The literature review describes that the use of methotrexate for abortion purpose with therapeutic-dose presents a similar adverse effects to those found in our patient, however there are no case reports that describe the use of this drug in macrodosis for the same purpose, and their cytotoxic effects."( [Acute toxicity by methotrexate used for abortion purpose. Case report].
Belmont-Gómez, A; Carvajal-Valencia, JA; Chacón-Solís, RA; Estrada-Altamirano, A; Hernández-Pacheco, JA; Maya-Quiñones, JL; Valenzuela-Jirón, A, 2011
)
0.37
"Buccal misoprostol 800 mcg and sublingual misoprostol 800 mcg show high efficacy when used with 200 mg mifepristone for early pregnancy termination but have different side effect profiles."( A randomized clinical trial comparing the short-term side effects of sublingual and buccal routes of misoprostol administration for medical abortions up to 63 days' gestation.
Chai, J; Ho, PC; Wong, CY, 2013
)
1.06
"The provision of safe abortion services to women who need them has the potential to drastically reduce or eliminate maternal deaths due to unsafe abortion."( A review of evidence for safe abortion care.
Brahmi, D; Jackson, E; Kapp, N; Tang, J; Whyte, P, 2013
)
0.39
"Systematic reviews pertaining to the evidence for safe abortion services, from pre-abortion care, medical and surgical methods of abortion and post-abortion care were evaluated for relevant outcomes, primarily those relating to safety, effectiveness and women's preference."( A review of evidence for safe abortion care.
Brahmi, D; Jackson, E; Kapp, N; Tang, J; Whyte, P, 2013
)
0.39
"Evidence-based guidelines assist health care providers and policymakers to utilize the best data available to provide safe abortion care and prevent the millions of deaths and disabilities that result from unsafe abortion."( A review of evidence for safe abortion care.
Brahmi, D; Jackson, E; Kapp, N; Tang, J; Whyte, P, 2013
)
0.39
"To analyze rates of significant adverse events and outcomes in women having a medical abortion at Planned Parenthood health centers in 2009 and 2010 and to identify changes in the rates of adverse events and outcomes between the 2 years."( Significant adverse events and outcomes after medical abortion.
Cleland, K; Creinin, MD; Nshom, M; Nucatola, D; Trussell, J, 2013
)
0.39
" We evaluated the incidence of six clinically significant adverse events (hospital admission, blood transfusion, emergency department treatment, intravenous antibiotics administration, infection, and death) and two significant outcomes (ongoing pregnancy and ectopic pregnancy diagnosed after medical abortion treatment was initiated)."( Significant adverse events and outcomes after medical abortion.
Cleland, K; Creinin, MD; Nshom, M; Nucatola, D; Trussell, J, 2013
)
0.39
"Among 233,805 medical abortions provided in 2009 and 2010, significant adverse events or outcomes were reported in 1,530 cases (0."( Significant adverse events and outcomes after medical abortion.
Cleland, K; Creinin, MD; Nshom, M; Nucatola, D; Trussell, J, 2013
)
0.39
"Medical treatment is a highly effective and safe method of management of non-viable first trimester pregnancy."( [Assessment of efficacy and safety of medical treatment of non-viable first trimester pregnancy].
Banaszek-Wysoczańska, A; Barcz, E; Dziadecki, W; Głuszak, M; Jabiry-Zieniewicz, Z; Zwierzchowska, A, 2012
)
0.38
"Low-dosage misoprostol required more time than dinoprostone to induce labour, but the two drugs were equally safe in terms of the risk of caesarean section and foetal outcomes."( Safe induction of labour with low-dose misoprostol, but less effective than the conventional dinoprostone regimen.
Bergholt, T; Løkkegaard, EC; Petersen, JF, 2013
)
1.05
"To present evidence of MA's contributions to reduced complications, describe strategies to enhance safe MA, and highlight existing barriers to access in LAC, while examining MA's role in newly legal abortion services."( Medical abortion: a path to safe, high-quality abortion care in Latin America and the Caribbean.
Dzuba, IG; Peña, M; Winikoff, B, 2013
)
0.39
" It also provides an update on its adverse effects and teratogenic effects."( [Pharmacology of misoprostol (pharmacokinetic data, adverse effects and teratogenic effects)].
Aubert, J; Bejan-Angoulvant, T; Jonville-Bera, AP, 2014
)
0.74
"Misoprostol is effective and safe for induction of labor in case of second or third trimester fetal death or termination of pregnancy."( [Use of misoprostol for induction of labor in case of fetal death or termination of pregnancy during second or third trimester of pregnancy: Efficiency, dosage, route of administration, side effects, use in case of uterine scar].
Chauvet, A; Clouqueur, E; Coulon, C; Deruelle, P; Houfflin-Debarge, V; Subtil, D; Vaast, P, 2014
)
2.28
"Unsafe abortion is a very important public health issue in the Central America and Caribbean region, where the use of modern contraceptive methods remains low and the restrictive legal framework reduces access to safe abortion."( Contribution of the Central American and Caribbean obstetrics and gynecology societies to the prevention of unsafe abortion in the region.
de Gil, MP, 2014
)
0.4
"Study data indicate that oral misoprostol and vaginal dinoprostone are similarly effective and safe for the induction of labor in twin gestations."( Induction of labor in twin pregnancies with oral misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone--is it effective and safe?
Huber, G; Schütz, H; Seelbach-Göbel, B, 2015
)
0.96
" When the possibility of poor compliance and the potential adverse effects of misoprostol are considered, rebamipide appears to be a clinically effective and safe alternative."( Preventive efficacy and safety of rebamipide in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced mucosal toxicity.
Cho, CS; Kang, YM; Kim, JH; Kim, SK; Lee, DH; Lee, SK; Lee, ST; Lee, YC; Park, SH; Park, W; Park, YW; Rew, JS; Yoo, WH, 2014
)
0.63
"50 mcg of sublingual misoprostol was more effective than and as safe as 25 mcg vaginal misoprostol for labour induction at term."( Comparison of the efficacy and safety of sublingual misoprostol with that of vaginal misoprostol for labour induction at term.
John, C; Preethi, R; Sheela, CN, 2015
)
0.99
" Lower doses of mifepristone combined with 200 µg of misoprostol are as effective and safe as higher doses of this combination for the termination of ultra-early pregnancy with lower possibility of vaginal bleeding and side effects."( Effectiveness and Safety of Lower Doses of Mifepristone Combined With Misoprostol for the Termination of Ultra-Early Pregnancy: A Dose-Ranging Randomized Controlled Trial.
Chen, DJ; Chen, WL; Li, CL; Liu, MX; Song, LP; Wang, Y; Zhang, ZF, 2015
)
0.9
" Cases were identified for this descriptive study from our electronic practice management (EPM) database, and our electronic database on adverse events was queried for information on efficacy and safety."( Efficacy and safety of medical abortion using mifepristone and buccal misoprostol through 63 days.
Cleland, K; Gatter, M; Nucatola, DL, 2015
)
0.65
"An evidence-based regimen of 200 mg of mifepristone orally followed by home use of 800 mcg of buccal misoprostol 24-48 h later is safe and effective through 63 days estimated gestational age."( Efficacy and safety of medical abortion using mifepristone and buccal misoprostol through 63 days.
Cleland, K; Gatter, M; Nucatola, DL, 2015
)
0.87
" The study illustrates positive steps forward being taken in making abortion safe and preventing and reducing unsafe abortion practices in Cambodia."( Towards safe abortion access: an exploratory study of medical abortion in Cambodia.
Cockroft, M; Delvaux, T; Ith, L; Petitet, PH, 2015
)
0.42
"Data show that an outpatient regimen of 200-mg mifepristone followed by a single dose of misoprostol is safe and effective for medical abortion for up to 70 days from last menstrual period (LMP)."( Outpatient medical abortion is safe and effective through 70 days gestation.
Abbas, D; Chong, E; Raymond, EG, 2015
)
0.64
"This paper describes the implementation of five Safe Abortion Information Hotlines (SAIH), a strategy developed by feminist collectives in a growing number of countries where abortion is legally restricted and unsafe."( Safe abortion information hotlines: An effective strategy for increasing women's access to safe abortions in Latin America.
Drovetta, RI, 2015
)
0.42
" The outcome measures were the success abortion rate, induction to abortion interval, the amount of bleeding, reoccurrence of menstruation and adverse events."( [Efficacy and safety of mifepristone combined with misoprostol for termination of pregnancy between 8 and 16 weeks of gestation].
Chang, Q; Di, W; Dong, B; Huang, Z; Jing, X; Li, Y; Qian, J; Ren, M; Shen, H; Shi, H; Song, W; Wu, S; Yao, C; Zheng, S, 2015
)
0.67
" Two cases of incomplete abortion were serious adverse events (SAE) relating to treatment."( [Efficacy and safety of mifepristone combined with misoprostol for termination of pregnancy between 8 and 16 weeks of gestation].
Chang, Q; Di, W; Dong, B; Huang, Z; Jing, X; Li, Y; Qian, J; Ren, M; Shen, H; Shi, H; Song, W; Wu, S; Yao, C; Zheng, S, 2015
)
0.67
"Oral or vaginal misoprostol combined with mifepristone, is effective and safe for termination of pregnancy between 8 and 16 weeks of gestation."( [Efficacy and safety of mifepristone combined with misoprostol for termination of pregnancy between 8 and 16 weeks of gestation].
Chang, Q; Di, W; Dong, B; Huang, Z; Jing, X; Li, Y; Qian, J; Ren, M; Shen, H; Shi, H; Song, W; Wu, S; Yao, C; Zheng, S, 2015
)
1.01
"Oral misoprostol, administered by trained health-workers is effective and safe for preventing postpartum haemorrhage (PPH)."( Effectiveness and safety of misoprostol distributed to antenatal women to prevent postpartum haemorrhage after child-births: a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial.
Campbell, OM; Fielding, K; Kaharuza, F; Lewis, JJ; Mirembe, F; Ononge, S, 2015
)
1.22
" Oral misoprostol at low doses has been found to be a safe and effective agent for labour induction in numerous studies carried out in the developed world, where there are better resources for monitoring of labour."( EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF 2-HOURLY 20 MCG ORAL MISOPROSTOL SOLUTION COMPARED TO STANDARD INTRAVENOUS OXYTOCIN IN LABOUR INDUCTION DUE TO PRE-LABOUR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM: A RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL AT KENYATTA NATIONAL HOSPITAL.
Kamau, K; Karanja, JG; Mbaluka, CM; Mugo, N, 2014
)
1.14
"Oral misoprostol solution 20mcg 2-hourly is as safe and effective as the standard intravenous oxytocin for labour induction in women presenting with prelabour rupture of membranes at term at the Kenyatta National Hospital."( EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF 2-HOURLY 20 MCG ORAL MISOPROSTOL SOLUTION COMPARED TO STANDARD INTRAVENOUS OXYTOCIN IN LABOUR INDUCTION DUE TO PRE-LABOUR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM: A RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL AT KENYATTA NATIONAL HOSPITAL.
Kamau, K; Karanja, JG; Mbaluka, CM; Mugo, N, 2014
)
1.17
" Nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity and neurotoxicity are dose-limiting adverse effects for cisplatin."( Protective role of misoprostol against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity.
Bayram, A; Doğan, M; Kaya, A; Özcan, İ; Polat, H; Şenel, F; Yaşar, M, 2016
)
0.76
" Access to safe surgical abortions has also increased in many such countries."( Insights from an expert group meeting on the definition and measurement of unsafe abortion.
Adewole, I; Askew, I; Bankole, A; Benson, J; Filippi, V; Ganatra, B; MacDonagh, S; Owolabi, OO; Pembe, AB; Rossier, C; Sedgh, G; Singh, SD, 2016
)
0.43
"MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library (from their inception to May 2015) were searched for randomised controlled trials comparing the risk of gastrointestinal adverse events in patients taking nonselective NSAIDs, selective cyclooxygenase(COX)-2 inhibitors or nonselective NSAIDs/COX-2 inhibitors plus gastroprotective agents [proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine-2 receptor antagonists, misoprostol]."( Systematic review with network meta-analysis: comparative effectiveness and safety of strategies for preventing NSAID-associated gastrointestinal toxicity.
Chan, FK; Mao, C; Tang, JL; Threapleton, DE; Tsoi, KK; Wang, JY; Yang, M; Yang, ZY; Yuan, JQ; Zou, B, 2016
)
0.6
"To assess adverse event (AE) resolution, delivery mode and neonatal outcomes after misoprostol or dinoprostone vaginal insert (MVI or DVI) retrieval due to AE during induction of labour (IOL)."( Induction of labour with retrievable prostaglandin vaginal inserts: outcomes following retrieval due to an intrapartum adverse event.
Powers, B; Rugarn, O; Tipping, D; Wing, DA, 2017
)
0.68
"Induction with prostaglandin vaginal inserts: outcomes following retrieval due to intrapartum adverse event."( Induction of labour with retrievable prostaglandin vaginal inserts: outcomes following retrieval due to an intrapartum adverse event.
Powers, B; Rugarn, O; Tipping, D; Wing, DA, 2017
)
0.46
" Mifepristone and misoprostol is safe and effective method for the second-trimester pregnancy termination."( Mifepristone and misoprostol is safe and effective method in the second-trimester pregnancy termination.
Immonen, E; Nissi, R; Santala, M; Talvensaari-Mattila, A, 2016
)
1.11
" Secondary end points were rates of unscheduled reattendance, time required for and cost of hospital observation and follow-up, vaginal bleeding, adverse effects, menstrual disturbance in the posttreatment period, and satisfaction rating."( Efficacy, Safety, and Acceptability of Low-Dose Mifepristone and Self-Administered Misoprostol for Ultra-Early Medical Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
He, H; Li, CL; Liao, YM; Mo, XT; Song, LP; Tang, SY; Zhou, LJGY, 2017
)
0.68
" PPIs significantly reduced gastrointestinal adverse events and the related withdrawals compared to placebo; there is no difference in safety between different PPIs."( Proton pump inhibitors for preventing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug induced gastrointestinal toxicity: a systematic review.
He, JH; He, M; Lei, PG; Li, QL; Liu, J; Luo, LM; Yang, M; Zhao, M; Zou, B, 2017
)
0.46
"PPIs are effective and safe in preventing peptic ulcers and complications in a wide spectrum of patients requiring NSAID therapy."( Proton pump inhibitors for preventing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug induced gastrointestinal toxicity: a systematic review.
He, JH; He, M; Lei, PG; Li, QL; Liu, J; Luo, LM; Yang, M; Zhao, M; Zou, B, 2017
)
0.46
" There were 674 serious adverse events (5."( Efficacy and safety of mifepristone-buccal misoprostol for early medical abortion in an Australian clinical setting.
Goldstone, P; Hawtin, K; Walker, C, 2017
)
0.72
"Mifepristone-buccal misoprostol is an effective and safe alternative to surgical termination of pregnancy up to 63 days gestation."( Efficacy and safety of mifepristone-buccal misoprostol for early medical abortion in an Australian clinical setting.
Goldstone, P; Hawtin, K; Walker, C, 2017
)
1.04
"By these results, misoprostol, a potent antioxidant, has protective effect against cochlear damage, and that may be a safe alternative."( Protective role of misoprostol in prevention of gentamicin ototoxicity.
Bayram, A; Dogan, M; Hira, İ; Kale, A; Karatas, D; Özcan, İ; Polat, H; Senel, F; Yasar, M, 2017
)
1.12
" No differences were observed in rates of uterine tachysystole, non-reassuring foetal status and neonatal adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of misoprostol, dinoprostone and Cook's balloon for labour induction in women with foetal growth restriction at term.
Arjona-Berral, JE; Castelo-Branco, C; de la Torre González, AJ; Duro-Gómez, J; Garrido-Oyarzún, MF; Rodríguez-Marín, AB, 2017
)
0.77
" The primary outcomes studied were i) the proportion of women delivering within 24 h of oral misoprostol administration, and ii) rates of maternal and perinatal severe adverse events."( Safety and effectiveness of oral misoprostol for induction of labour in a resource-limited setting: a dose escalation study.
Aipit, J; Bolnga, JW; Laman, M; Morris, M; Rero, A; Verave, O, 2017
)
0.96
" Most women felt safe (97%; 779/799), and 93% (748/801) perceived the treatment as expected/easier than expected."( Post-abortion care with misoprostol - equally effective, safe and accepted when administered by midwives compared to physicians: a randomised controlled equivalence trial in a low-resource setting in Kenya.
Faxelid, E; Gemzell-Danielsson, K; Klingberg-Allvin, M; Makenzius, M; Odero, TMA; Oguttu, M, 2017
)
0.76
"Treatment of incomplete abortion with misoprostol provided by midwives is equally effective, safe and accepted by women as when administered by physicians in a low-resource setting."( Post-abortion care with misoprostol - equally effective, safe and accepted when administered by midwives compared to physicians: a randomised controlled equivalence trial in a low-resource setting in Kenya.
Faxelid, E; Gemzell-Danielsson, K; Klingberg-Allvin, M; Makenzius, M; Odero, TMA; Oguttu, M, 2017
)
1.03
"This was an implementation study at four referral facilities and 28 Felsher Obstetric Points in two districts to train their midwives and family nurses to deliver safe and effective abortion care with co-packaged mifepristone-misoprostol and provide contraceptives postabortion."( Provision of medical abortion by midlevel healthcare providers in Kyrgyzstan: testing an intervention to expand safe abortion services to underserved rural and periurban areas.
Boobekova, A; Davletova, A; Johnson, BR; Kazakbaeva, C; Kondrateva, Y; Landoulsi, S; Lazdane, G; Maksutova, E; Monolbaev, K; Seuc Jo, AH, 2018
)
0.67
" This locally generated evidence can be used by the Kyrgyz Ministry of Health to reduce unintended pregnancy and expand safe abortion care to women in underserved periurban and rural settings."( Provision of medical abortion by midlevel healthcare providers in Kyrgyzstan: testing an intervention to expand safe abortion services to underserved rural and periurban areas.
Boobekova, A; Davletova, A; Johnson, BR; Kazakbaeva, C; Kondrateva, Y; Landoulsi, S; Lazdane, G; Maksutova, E; Monolbaev, K; Seuc Jo, AH, 2018
)
0.48
"Expanding access to medication abortion through pharmacies is a promising avenue to reach women with safe and convenient care, yet no pharmacy provision interventions have been evaluated."( Effectiveness and safety of early medication abortion provided in pharmacies by auxiliary nurse-midwives: A non-inferiority study in Nepal.
Blum, M; Darney, PD; Grossman, D; Harper, CC; Maharjan, D; Puri, M; Regmi, K; Rocca, CH; Shrestha, P, 2018
)
0.48
" No serious adverse events occurred."( Effectiveness and safety of early medication abortion provided in pharmacies by auxiliary nurse-midwives: A non-inferiority study in Nepal.
Blum, M; Darney, PD; Grossman, D; Harper, CC; Maharjan, D; Puri, M; Regmi, K; Rocca, CH; Shrestha, P, 2018
)
0.48
"Early mifepristone-misoprostol abortion was as effective and safe when provided by trained auxiliary nurse-midwives at pharmacies as at government-certified health facilities."( Effectiveness and safety of early medication abortion provided in pharmacies by auxiliary nurse-midwives: A non-inferiority study in Nepal.
Blum, M; Darney, PD; Grossman, D; Harper, CC; Maharjan, D; Puri, M; Regmi, K; Rocca, CH; Shrestha, P, 2018
)
0.81
" Misoprostol, a Prostaglandin E1 analogue has been found to be safe and effective in treatment of early pregnancy failure."( Success And Safety Of Misoprostol For Treatment Of Early Pregnancy Failure.
Habib, S; Nazir, Q; Noor, MM; Parveen, Z; Sultana, R,
)
1.36
"Misoprostol is a safe and effective treatment option for the management of early pregnancy failure."( Success And Safety Of Misoprostol For Treatment Of Early Pregnancy Failure.
Habib, S; Nazir, Q; Noor, MM; Parveen, Z; Sultana, R,
)
1.89
" We aimed to estimate the costs and cost effectiveness of providing three safe second-trimester abortion services (dilation and evacuation (D&E)), medical induction with mifepristone and misoprostol (MI-combined), or medical induction with misoprostol alone (MI-misoprostol)) in Western Cape Province, South Africa to aid policymakers with planning for service provision in South Africa and similar settings."( The costs and cost effectiveness of providing second-trimester medical and surgical safe abortion services in Western Cape Province, South Africa.
Blanchard, K; Constant, D; Grossman, D; Harries, J; Kluge, J; Lince-Deroche, N; Sinanovic, E, 2018
)
0.67
" The outcome variables were induction of delivery time, number of doses within 48 hours, result of induction, surgical evacuation, bleeding after induction, requirement of blood transfusion and Dinoprostone gel; side effect & complication of misoprostol were recorded."( Efficacy and Safety of Intravaginal Misoprostol for Mid-trimester Medical Termination of Pregnancy.
Akhter, N; Arzoo, S; Ferdous, B; Yousuf, S, 2018
)
0.94
" Secondary outcomes were mode of delivery, occurrence of tachysystole, use of analgesia and neonatal adverse outcome."( Efficacy and safety of misoprostol vaginal insert vs. oral misoprostol for induction of labor.
Hoesli, I; Huhn, EA; Redling, K; Schaedelin, S, 2019
)
0.82
" Abdominal cramping was the most common side effect (95."( Safety, Efficacy and Acceptability of Early First Trimester Abortion using Oral Mifepristone and Sublingual Misoprostol.
Aryal, S; Sharma, B; Shrestha, D, 2018
)
0.69
"The proposed study seeks to gather evidence on which of these three therapeutic options achieves the highest rate of vaginal delivery with the best safety profile, to enable obstetricians to use the most effective and safe option for their patients."( Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial.
Álvarez-Sala, J; Barbero, L; Bilbao, I; Echevarria, O; Fariñas, A; Hernanz Chaves, R; Lapuente-Ocamica, O; Lasa, IL; Lopez-Lopez, JA; Lopez-Picado, A; Paz Corral, D; Sanchez-Refoyo, F; Ugarte, L; Vicarregui, J, 2019
)
0.78
" With gestational length up to 70 days, it is considered effective, safe and acceptable by women."( Expanding a woman's options to include home use of misoprostol for medical abortion up until 76 days: an observational study of efficacy and safety.
Larsson, A; Ronnberg, AM, 2019
)
0.77
"Our study indicates that home use of misoprostol for medical abortion at 64-76 days gestation may be as safe and effective as at 57-63 days."( Expanding a woman's options to include home use of misoprostol for medical abortion up until 76 days: an observational study of efficacy and safety.
Larsson, A; Ronnberg, AM, 2019
)
1.04
"After years of the worsening burden of unsafe abortion and attendant morbidities and mortalities in Nigeria, a National Guideline on the Safe termination of pregnancy for legal indications was enunciated."( The Benefits of a Guideline on Safe Termination of Pregnancy for Legal Indications: An Illustrative Case Report of a Hydranencephaly.
Abdullahi, ZG; Bello, N; Igashi, JB; Koledade, AK; Maikudi, HA; Mohammed, U; Shittu, OS, 2019
)
0.51
"At the conference "Developing an Advocacy Agenda for Abortion in the 21st Century and Making Change Happen" held on 5-7 September 2018, Lisbon, Portugal, organized by the International Campaign for Women's Right to Safe Abortion, it was argued that abortion services not only need to be treated as a bona fide form of health care but also completely reconceptualized, particularly because of the influence of medical abortion pills."( Reconceptualizing safe abortion and abortion services in the age of abortion pills: A discussion paper.
Berer, M, 2020
)
0.56
" To date, no cost-effective and safe protective agent has been developed that can completely prevent or treat NSAID-related lower GI injuries."( Potential Strategies in the Prevention of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs-Associated Adverse Effects in the Lower Gastrointestinal Tract.
Guo, CG; Leung, WK, 2020
)
0.56
"The extracted outcomes were: cervical canal width, ease of dilatation, time for cervical dilatation and adverse effects (nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, bleeding, fever, abdominal pain/uterine cramping and any complications during the procedure)."( Efficacy and safety of oral vs vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before hysteroscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Abbas, AM; Abdelhakim, AM; Gadallah, AH, 2019
)
0.78
"Oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol before hysteroscopy were similar in terms of cervical canal width, ease of dilatation and various adverse effects, except that the vaginal route was associated with faster cervical dilatation and lower prevalence of diarrhoea."( Efficacy and safety of oral vs vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before hysteroscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Abbas, AM; Abdelhakim, AM; Gadallah, AH, 2019
)
1.06
"Oral misoprosol is a safe method for labor induction in SGA near-term and term pregnancies and, concerning the neonatal outcome, comparable with other methods of labor induction or primary CS."( Safety of misoprostol for near-term and term induction in small-for-gestational-age pregnancies compared to dinoprostone and primary cesarean section: results of a retrospective cohort study.
Bachmann, E; Battista, MJ; Hasenburg, A; Steetskamp, J, 2020
)
0.96
" Moreover, use of long acting contraceptives to prevent unintended pregnancy and access to safe abortion may reduce the burden of unsafe abortions on public health system."( An Overview of Unsafe Abortion: Patterns and Outcomes in a Tertiary Level Hospital.
Begum, S; Islam, N; Jahan, T; Mirza, TT; Nahar, S; Nigar, K; Panna, LK; Shamsi, S; Sharmin, T; Shejuti, TR, 2020
)
0.56
"The Family First Aid approach is a safe and feasible model of care that provides timely PPH treatment to women delivering at home in rural communities."( The Safety and Feasibility of a Family First Aid Approach for the Management of Postpartum Hemorrhage in Home Births: A Pre-post Intervention Study in Rural Pakistan.
Abbas, D; Dabash, R; Durocher, J; Jafarey, S; Kamal, I; Mary, M; Rabbani, A; Tan, YL; Winikoff, B, 2021
)
0.62
" The primary outcome was the proportion of women who delivered within 24 h of drug administration without any severe adverse events."( Safety and efficacy of an oral misoprostol standard-dose regimen vs a low-dose regimen for induction of labour in Papua New Guinean women: An open-label randomised controlled trial.
Ao, P; Bolnga, JW; Laman, M; Lufele, E; Mola, GDL; Totona, C, 2021
)
0.91
" Fourteen women (11%) in the standard-dose regimen and 20 (15%) in the low-dose regimen had severe adverse events."( Safety and efficacy of an oral misoprostol standard-dose regimen vs a low-dose regimen for induction of labour in Papua New Guinean women: An open-label randomised controlled trial.
Ao, P; Bolnga, JW; Laman, M; Lufele, E; Mola, GDL; Totona, C, 2021
)
0.91
" There was no significant difference in the number of adverse events between the two regimens."( Safety and efficacy of an oral misoprostol standard-dose regimen vs a low-dose regimen for induction of labour in Papua New Guinean women: An open-label randomised controlled trial.
Ao, P; Bolnga, JW; Laman, M; Lufele, E; Mola, GDL; Totona, C, 2021
)
0.91
" The primary efficacy outcome was vaginal delivery within 24 h and primary safety outcomes were neonatal and maternal composite adverse outcomes."( Efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol vs transvaginal balloon catheter for labor induction: An observational study within the SWEdish Postterm Induction Study (SWEPIS).
Alkmark, M; Carlsson, Y; Elden, H; Fadl, H; Hagberg, H; Jonsson, M; Ladfors, L; Saltvedt, S; Sengpiel, V; Wendel, SB; Wennerholm, UB; Wessberg, A; Wikström, AK, 2021
)
0.92
"Primary: Analyze the Adverse Events (AEs) reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) after use of mifepristone as an abortifacient."( Deaths and Severe Adverse Events after the use of Mifepristone as an Abortifacient from September 2000 to February 2019.
Aultman, K; Beran, BD; Cirucci, CA; Harrison, DJ; Lockwood, MD; Seiler, S, 2021
)
0.62
"Adverse Event Reports (AERs) for mifepristone used as an abortifacient, submitted to the FDA from September 2000 to February 2019, were analyzed using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAEv3)."( Deaths and Severe Adverse Events after the use of Mifepristone as an Abortifacient from September 2000 to February 2019.
Aultman, K; Beran, BD; Cirucci, CA; Harrison, DJ; Lockwood, MD; Seiler, S, 2021
)
0.62
" The FDA AER system is inadequate and significantly underestimates the adverse events from mifepristone."( Deaths and Severe Adverse Events after the use of Mifepristone as an Abortifacient from September 2000 to February 2019.
Aultman, K; Beran, BD; Cirucci, CA; Harrison, DJ; Lockwood, MD; Seiler, S, 2021
)
0.62
"For this prospective, observational cohort study, we recruited callers from two safe abortion accompaniment groups in Argentina and Nigeria who requested information on self-managed medication abortion."( Effectiveness of self-managed medication abortion with accompaniment support in Argentina and Nigeria (SAFE): a prospective, observational cohort study and non-inferiority analysis with historical controls.
Bercu, C; Carbone, S; Egwuatu, I; Gerdts, C; Grosso, B; Jayaweera, R; Kristianingrum, IA; Moseson, H; Motana, R; Nmezi, S; Zurbriggen, R, 2022
)
0.72
"Globally, access to safe abortion is limited."( Reducing the harms of unsafe abortion: a systematic review of the safety, effectiveness and acceptability of harm reduction counselling for pregnant persons seeking induced abortion.
Gill, R; Kim, CR; Stifani, BM, 2022
)
0.72
" We included studies in which healthcare providers gave pregnant persons information on safe use of abortifacient medications without providing the actual medications."( Reducing the harms of unsafe abortion: a systematic review of the safety, effectiveness and acceptability of harm reduction counselling for pregnant persons seeking induced abortion.
Gill, R; Kim, CR; Stifani, BM, 2022
)
0.72
"Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are one of the most frequently used medications for pain, even though they increase the risk for adverse cardiovascular events."( Reduced risk of NSAID-Induced adverse events with concomitant use of misoprostol (MICRO study).
Cheung, AK; Munger, MA; Nelson, SD; Sauer, BC; Teng, CC, 2022
)
0.96
"Compared with NSAID use alone, the concomitant use of NSAID plus misoprostol is associated with a reduced risk of NSAID-induced cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and renal adverse events."( Reduced risk of NSAID-Induced adverse events with concomitant use of misoprostol (MICRO study).
Cheung, AK; Munger, MA; Nelson, SD; Sauer, BC; Teng, CC, 2022
)
1.19
"Mifepristone and misoprostol are extremely safe medications with many applications."( Mifepristone: A Safe Method of Medical Abortion and Self-Managed Medical Abortion in the Post-Roe Era.
Katz, A; Schmidt, EO; Stein, RA,
)
0.47
" Each of these medications has a unique adverse effect and toxicity profile."( Toxicity of abortifacients: A review for physicians in the post roe era.
Mazer-Amirshahi, M; Ye, P, 2022
)
0.72
"Agents used for medication abortion have unique contraindications and adverse effects."( Toxicity of abortifacients: A review for physicians in the post roe era.
Mazer-Amirshahi, M; Ye, P, 2022
)
0.72
"Clinical assessment and treatment of second trimester incomplete abortion with misoprostol provided by midwives was equally effective and safe as when provided by physicians."( Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of treatment of incomplete second trimester abortion with misoprostol provided by midwives and physicians: a randomised, controlled, equivalence trial in Uganda.
Atuhairwe, S; Byamugisha, J; Cleeve, A; Gemzell-Danielsson, K; Hanson, C; Kakaire, O; Klingberg-Allvin, M; Tumwesigye, NM, 2022
)
1.16
"Misoprostol alone is a safe and effective option for terminating second-trimester pregnancies with one or more previous CSs in settings where mifepristone is unavailable."( The safety of misoprostol alone use for second-trimester termination of pregnancy in women with previous caesarean deliveries.
Dundar, B; Erturk, A; Karapinar, BT; Kender Erturk, N; Tasgoz, FN, 2022
)
2.52
" According to the obtained results, MP was found to be quite effective in the protection of kidneys from the toxic effects of AK."( Prevention of nephrotoxicity induced by amikacin: The role of misoprostol, A prostaglandin E1 analogue.
Azırak, S, 2023
)
1.15
"The findings of our study suggest that oral misoprostol intake is equally safe to vaginal misoprostol in terms of inducing labor at term."( Efficacy and safety of oral and sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Constantinou, T; Daskalakis, G; Koumenis, A; Panagiotopoulos, M; Pergialiotis, V; Stavros, S; Vogiatzi Vokotopoulou, L; Voskos, A, 2023
)
1.42
"To evaluate self-reported outcomes and serious adverse events following self-managed medication abortion using misoprostol alone provided from an online service."( Safety and effectiveness of self-managed abortion using misoprostol alone acquired from an online telemedicine service in the United States.
Aiken, ARA; Gomperts, R; Johnson, DM; Michels-Gualtieri, M, 2023
)
1.37
" The main outcomes were the proportion of people who reported ending their pregnancy without instrumentation intervention and the proportion who received treatment for serious adverse events."( Safety and effectiveness of self-managed abortion using misoprostol alone acquired from an online telemedicine service in the United States.
Aiken, ARA; Gomperts, R; Johnson, DM; Michels-Gualtieri, M, 2023
)
1.16
" Of the 568 who took the misoprostol, 12 (2%) reported experiencing one or more serious adverse events and 20 (4%) reported experiencing a symptom of a potential complication."( Safety and effectiveness of self-managed abortion using misoprostol alone acquired from an online telemedicine service in the United States.
Aiken, ARA; Gomperts, R; Johnson, DM; Michels-Gualtieri, M, 2023
)
1.46
"Self-managed medication abortion using misoprostol provided by an online telemedicine service has a high rate of effectiveness and a low rate of serious adverse events."( Safety and effectiveness of self-managed abortion using misoprostol alone acquired from an online telemedicine service in the United States.
Aiken, ARA; Gomperts, R; Johnson, DM; Michels-Gualtieri, M, 2023
)
1.43
" This study was conducted to assess the association between early fetal heart tracing (FHT) and maternal tocodynamometry patterns and the incidence of adverse fetal and pregnancy outcomes after the administration of oral misoprostol for cervical ripening."( Fetal heart rate patterns and the incidence of adverse events after oral misoprostol administration for cervical ripening among low-risk pregnancies.
Kandahari, N; Mohta, VJ; Raine-Bennett, TR; Schneider, AN; Tucker, LS, 2023
)
1.33
" Abnormal FHT, abnormal uterine activity, and adverse pregnancy or fetal-related events documented in the electronic health record in the four hours after administration of the first and second doses of misoprostol were assessed using descriptive statistics."( Fetal heart rate patterns and the incidence of adverse events after oral misoprostol administration for cervical ripening among low-risk pregnancies.
Kandahari, N; Mohta, VJ; Raine-Bennett, TR; Schneider, AN; Tucker, LS, 2023
)
1.33
"The risk of short-term adverse outcomes associated with misoprostol is low among relatively low-risk patients."( Fetal heart rate patterns and the incidence of adverse events after oral misoprostol administration for cervical ripening among low-risk pregnancies.
Kandahari, N; Mohta, VJ; Raine-Bennett, TR; Schneider, AN; Tucker, LS, 2023
)
1.39
" Neonatal parameters like 1 min Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, and Respiration score and neonatal intensive care unit admission were comparable, and there was no significant difference in terms of major adverse events and side effects."( Comparison of fetal safety of vaginal Misoprostol tablet and Dinoprostone gel for induction of labor: An open-label randomized control trial.
Bag, T; Chakraborty, A; Das, P; Mistri, PK; Pande, A; Rakshit, BM; Samanta, A, 2023
)
1.18
"Misoprostol is a safe alternative to Dinoprostone gel for induction of labor and found to be more effective labor-inducing agent."( Comparison of fetal safety of vaginal Misoprostol tablet and Dinoprostone gel for induction of labor: An open-label randomized control trial.
Bag, T; Chakraborty, A; Das, P; Mistri, PK; Pande, A; Rakshit, BM; Samanta, A, 2023
)
2.62
"Although some studies in this updated review were adjudicated to have a high risk of bias, the results continue to support the key conclusion of our 2019 analysis: misoprostol-only is effective and safe for the termination of first-trimester intrauterine pregnancy."( Effectiveness and safety of misoprostol-only for first-trimester medication abortion: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Raymond, EG; Shochet, T; Weaver, MA, 2023
)
1.4
"Misoprostol-only is a safe and effective option for medication abortion in the first trimester if mifepristone is unavailable or inaccessible."( Effectiveness and safety of misoprostol-only for first-trimester medication abortion: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Raymond, EG; Shochet, T; Weaver, MA, 2023
)
2.65
"For this prospective observational cohort study of callers to safe abortion hotlines and accompaniment groups in Argentina, Nigeria, and Southeast Asia, participants were recruited between July 31, 2019, and October 1, 2020, prior to starting their medication abortion."( Medication Abortion Safety and Effectiveness With Misoprostol Alone.
Bercu, C; Egwuatu, I; Gerdts, C; Grosso, B; Jayaweera, R; Kristianingrum, IA; Moseson, H; Nmezi, S; Zurbriggen, R, 2023
)
1.16
" Secondary outcomes included method safety, measured by self-report of experiencing warning signs (eg, heavy bleeding, pain, fever, discharge) indicative of a potential complication and by medical treatment (eg, blood transfusion, intravenous fluids, overnight hospital stay) indicative of a potential adverse event."( Medication Abortion Safety and Effectiveness With Misoprostol Alone.
Bercu, C; Egwuatu, I; Gerdts, C; Grosso, B; Jayaweera, R; Kristianingrum, IA; Moseson, H; Nmezi, S; Zurbriggen, R, 2023
)
1.16
" Potential adverse events were reported by 6 participants (0."( Medication Abortion Safety and Effectiveness With Misoprostol Alone.
Bercu, C; Egwuatu, I; Gerdts, C; Grosso, B; Jayaweera, R; Kristianingrum, IA; Moseson, H; Nmezi, S; Zurbriggen, R, 2023
)
1.16

Pharmacokinetics

Misoprostol had no significant effect on the t/2, Cmax or AUC of propranolol either after a single dose or at steady state. The overall absorption as shown by the values for area under the concentration curve of indomethacin was unaffected by concurrent administration of misoprostols.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The overall absorption as shown by the values for area under the concentration curve of indomethacin was unaffected by concurrent administration of misoprostol."( Effects of misoprostol on the pharmacokinetics of indomethacin in human volunteers.
Hantsbarger, G; Hunt, RH; James, C; Karim, A; Nicholson, PA; Rainsford, KD; Rischke, JA; Smith, M; Stetsko, PI, 1992
)
0.87
" On this day, subjects began taking diazepam (10 mg) orally for one week, with pharmacokinetic studies performed at day 8, when steady state levels of diazepam were reached."( Effect of orally administered misoprostol and cimetidine on the steady state pharmacokinetics of diazepam and nordiazepam in human volunteers.
Andrade, GN; Lima, DR; Santos, RM; Werneck, E,
)
0.42
" Misoprostol had no significant effect on the t/2, Cmax or AUC of propranolol either after a single dose or at steady state."( Misoprostol does not alter the pharmacokinetics of propranolol.
Bennett, PN; Fenn, GC; Lee, CE; Notarianni, LJ, 1991
)
2.63
" Pharmacokinetic variable values in elderly subjects did not differ in a clinically significant manner from those in younger subjects."( Pharmacokinetics of misoprostol in the elderly, in patients with renal failure and when coadministered with NSAID or antipyrine, propranolol or diazepam.
Karim, A; Nicholson, PA; Smith, M, 1990
)
0.6
"Low misoprostol dose (microgram range), extremely low plasma levels (pg range) of misoprostol acid, and the necessity of using a complex, time consuming, and labor intensive RIA method of analysis make it technically difficult to study the pharmacokinetic profile of misoprostol in man."( Antiulcer prostaglandin misoprostol: single and multiple dose pharmacokinetic profile.
Karim, A, 1987
)
1.14
" The plasma half-life and area under the plasma concentration-time curve of antipyrine were unchanged."( Potential drug interactions with misoprostol: effects on the pharmacokinetics of antipyrine and propranolol.
Bennett, PN; Fenn, GC; Notarianni, LJ, 1988
)
0.56
"The pharmacokinetic parameters of four different routes of administration of a single dose of 400 microg of misoprostol were studied."( Pharmacokinetics of different routes of administration of misoprostol.
Ho, PC; Lee, SW; Schweer, H; Seyberth, HW; Tang, OS, 2002
)
0.77
"Sublingual misoprostol achieved the highest serum peak concentration (Cmax) (574."( Pharmacokinetics of different routes of administration of misoprostol.
Ho, PC; Lee, SW; Schweer, H; Seyberth, HW; Tang, OS, 2002
)
0.95
" In amniotic fluid the half-life was between 31 and 37 hours."( Pharmacokinetics of prostaglandins.
Bygdeman, M, 2003
)
0.32
"To compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of orally, rectally, and vaginally administered misoprostol tablets in pregnant women."( Oral, rectal, and vaginal pharmacokinetics of misoprostol.
El-Refaey, H; Khan, RU; Sharma, S; Sooranna, D; Stafford, M, 2004
)
0.8
"Serum peak concentration (Cmax) was highest for conventional oral misoprostol."( Pharmacokinetics of a novel oral slow-release form of misoprostol.
Aronsson, A; Fiala, C; Gemzell-Danielsson, K; Granath, F; Seyberth, HW; Stephansson, O; Watzer, B, 2005
)
0.81
"The objective of this investigation was to report the pharmacokinetic properties of misoprostol administered intravaginally to women at term via a controlled-release hydrogel polymer insert."( Pharmacokinetics of a controlled-release misoprostol vaginal insert at term.
Carr, D; Di Spirito, M; Plasse, TF; Powers, BL; Rayburn, WF, 2006
)
0.82
" Pharmacokinetic parameters are proportional to the reservoir dose."( Pharmacokinetics of a controlled-release misoprostol vaginal insert at term.
Carr, D; Di Spirito, M; Plasse, TF; Powers, BL; Rayburn, WF, 2006
)
0.6
" A pharmacokinetic study has shown that sublingual misoprostol has the shortest onset of action, the highest peak concentration and the greatest bioavailability among the three routes of administration."( The pharmacokinetics and different regimens of misoprostol in early first-trimester medical abortion.
Ho, PC; Tang, OS, 2006
)
0.84
"It has been shown that the route of administration of misoprostol has a strong impact on the pharmacokinetic profile and result in different clinical efficacy."( Pharmacokinetic profiles up to 12 h after administration of vaginal, sublingual and slow-release oral misoprostol.
Aronsson, A; Fiala, C; Gemzell-Danielsson, K; Granath, F; Schweer, H; Stephansson, O; Watzer, B, 2007
)
0.8
"0001) and the time to peak concentration was shortest for this group (P=0."( Pharmacokinetic profiles up to 12 h after administration of vaginal, sublingual and slow-release oral misoprostol.
Aronsson, A; Fiala, C; Gemzell-Danielsson, K; Granath, F; Schweer, H; Stephansson, O; Watzer, B, 2007
)
0.55
" This study investigated the pharmacokinetic profiles of these vaginal inserts and orally administered misoprostol."( Pharmacokinetic profiles of controlled-release hydrogel polymer vaginal inserts containing misoprostol.
Carr, D; Di Spirito, M; Ewert, K; Powers, BL; Wing, DA, 2008
)
0.78
" To aid the design of effective and safe regimens, we have investigated the pharmacokinetic parameters after the vaginal or sublingual administration of repeated doses of 400 microg of misoprostol."( Pharmacokinetics of repeated doses of misoprostol.
Ho, PC; Lee, SW; Schweer, H; Tang, OS, 2009
)
0.82
" The developed assay method was applied to an oral pharmacokinetic study in humans."( Development and validation of highly sensitive method for determination of misoprostol free acid in human plasma by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry: application to a clinical pharmacokinetic study.
Bhushan, I; Hotha, KK; Jagadeesh, B; Patil, U; Vijaya Bharathi, D, 2011
)
0.6
" There were no significant differences in other pharmacokinetic parameters between subjects with vaginal pH < 5 and those with vaginal pH 5 in all three groups."( A randomized comparison of pharmacokinetics of a single vaginal dose of dry misoprostol or misoprostol moistened with normal saline or with acetic acid.
Ho, PC; Lee, VC; Li, RH; Ng, EH; Schweer, H; Watzer, B; Yung, SS, 2011
)
0.6
" Misoprostol oral bioavailability is low and several authors have assessed whether the administration by other routes increased its pharmacodynamic effects."( [Pharmacology of misoprostol (pharmacokinetic data, adverse effects and teratogenic effects)].
Aubert, J; Bejan-Angoulvant, T; Jonville-Bera, AP, 2014
)
1.65
"The aim of the study was to compare the pharmacokinetic parameters of 800 μg oral, sublingual and buccal misoprostol in healthy non-pregnant women."( A crossover pharmacokinetic study of misoprostol by the oral, sublingual and buccal routes.
Byrne, ME; Frye, LJ; Winikoff, B, 2016
)
0.92
" The primary pharmacokinetic parameters measured were the area under the plasma misoprostol acid concentration-time curve (AUC) from dosing to last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t), the AUC from 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞) and the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax)."( A crossover pharmacokinetic study of misoprostol by the oral, sublingual and buccal routes.
Byrne, ME; Frye, LJ; Winikoff, B, 2016
)
0.93
"There were statistically significant differences in AUC0-∞, AUC0-t and Cmax at the p < 0."( A crossover pharmacokinetic study of misoprostol by the oral, sublingual and buccal routes.
Byrne, ME; Frye, LJ; Winikoff, B, 2016
)
0.71
"This study shows variability in Cmax and AUC by three by-mouth routes of misoprostol administration."( A crossover pharmacokinetic study of misoprostol by the oral, sublingual and buccal routes.
Byrne, ME; Frye, LJ; Winikoff, B, 2016
)
0.94
" Mean disappearance half-life was shortest in the PR condition (21 ± 29 minutes), compared with values for the unfed (170 ± 129 minutes) and fed (119 ± 51 minutes) PO conditions."( Single-dose pharmacokinetics of orally and rectally administered misoprostol in adult horses.
Boothe, D; Lascola, K; Lopp, CT; McCoy, AM; Schaeffer, DJ, 2019
)
0.75
" This study aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetic profiles of misoprostol tablets (test product) by comparing them with Cytotec (200 μg) (reference product)."( Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Misoprostol Tablets: An Open-Label, Randomized, Single-dose, Crossover Study With Healthy Chinese Volunteers.
Chang, D; Dai, Y; Guo, S; Han, Y; Ni, S; Wang, S; Wei, H; Wu, F; Xia, Q; Zhang, J; Zhao, X, 2022
)
1.23

Compound-Compound Interactions

DL111-IT combined with mifepristone (RU486) and misoprostol (M ISO) on early pregnancy termination. Previous research had indicated there is no difference in clinical efficacy between 200 mg and 600 mg (standard dose) of mifEpristone in combination with 600 mcg of misop Frost.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Mifepristone (600 mg) in combination with a prostaglandin has been demonstrated to be a safe, acceptable alternative to vacuum aspiration for induction of abortion in the first 9 weeks of pregnancy."( Randomized trial of misoprostol and cervagem in combination with a reduced dose of mifepristone for induction of abortion.
Baird, DT; Sukcharoen, N; Thong, KJ, 1995
)
0.61
" The authors' previous research had indicated there is no difference in clinical efficacy between 200 mg and 600 mg (standard dose) of mifepristone in combination with 600 mcg of misoprostol."( Randomized trial of misoprostol and cervagem in combination with a reduced dose of mifepristone for induction of abortion.
Baird, DT; Sukcharoen, N; Thong, KJ, 1995
)
0.81
"To determine the mode of protective effects of misoprostol against the chronic gastrointestinal ulceration from the NSAID, diclofenac, studies were undertaken in domestic pigs, a model of human gastrointestinal ulceration, to determine (1) the effects of repeated daily dosing for 10 days of diclofenac 5 mg/kg/day twice a day (as Voltaren tablets) on the gastrointestinal morphology, 59fe-red blood loss, mucosal myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity (as an indicator of leukocyte infiltration), and mucosal leukotrienes (LTS); and (2) the mucosal protective effects of 10-40 micrograms/kg/day misoprostol twice a day (as Cytotec tablets) given with diclofenac 5 mg/kg/day twice a day compared with diclofenac 5 mg/kg/day alone and aspirin 150 mg/kg/twice a day (USP tablets) as a standard."( Chronic effects of misoprostol in combination with the NSAID, diclofenac, on gastrointestinal tract of pigs. Relation to diarrheagenic activity, leukocyte infiltration, and mucosal leukotrienes.
Perkins, WE; Rainsford, KD; Stetsko, PI, 1995
)
0.88
"A prospective randomized study was conducted to compare the efficacy of misoprostol with gemeprost when combined with mifepristone for termination of second trimester pregnancy."( Misoprostol is as effective as gemeprost in termination of second trimester pregnancy when combined with mifepristone: a randomised comparative trial.
Chan, YF; Ho, PC; Lau, W, 1996
)
1.97
"Findings are presented from a prospective randomized study conducted to compare the efficacy of misoprostol with gemeprost when combined with mifepristone to terminate second trimester pregnancy."( Misoprostol is as effective as gemeprost in termination of second trimester pregnancy when combined with mifepristone: a randomised comparative trial.
Chan, YF; Ho, PC; Lau, W, 1996
)
1.95
" Oral misoprostol (400 microg) given every 3 h up to five doses, when combined with mifepristone, was as effective as the vaginal (200 microg) route in second trimester termination of pregnancy."( Randomized comparison of vaginal (200 microg every 3 h) and oral (400 microg every 3 h) misoprostol when combined with mifepristone in termination of second trimester pregnancy.
Ho, PC; Ngai, SW; Tang, OS, 2000
)
1.01
"Gemeprost and misoprostol are two of the most widely used prostaglandins in combination with mifepristone for medical abortion in early pregnancy."( Double-blind randomized trial of mifepristone in combination with vaginal gemeprost or misoprostol for induction of abortion up to 63 days gestation.
Baird, DT; Bartley, J; Brown, A; Elton, R, 2001
)
0.89
" However, when gosyypol was given in combination with misoprostol 400, 800 or 1600 micrograms."( [Effect of gossypol in combination with misoprostol on termination of early pregnancy in rats and mice].
Cao, L; Chen, Y; Gu, ZP, 1997
)
0.81
"To compare the effectiveness of gemeprost and misoprostol as prostaglandins used in combination with mifepristone for induction of mid-trimester termination."( A randomised study of misoprostol and gemeprost in combination with mifepristone for induction of abortion in the second trimester of pregnancy.
Baird, DT; Bartley, J, 2002
)
0.89
"This study evaluated the effectiveness and acute toxicity of DL111-IT combined with mifepristone (RU486) and misoprostol (MISO) on early pregnancy termination."( Synergistic effects of DL111-IT in combination with mifepristone and misoprostol on termination of early pregnancy in preclinical studies.
Fang, RY; He, QJ; Wang, WF; Wu, HH; Yang, B, 2003
)
0.77
"To assess the safety of mifepristone in combination with misoprotol for medical abortion."( [Side effect of mifepristone in combination with misoprostol for medical abortion].
Jiang, S; Lei, ZW; Li, Q; Li, YP; Lü, L; Zou, Y, 2004
)
0.58
"To observe the effects of propofol combined with misoprostol for painless induced abortion."( [Clinical observation of propofol combined with misoprostol for painless induced abortion].
Fan, GS; Jin, L; Li, H; Xi, S, 2005
)
0.84
"Intravenous injection of propofol combined with misoprostol administered intravaginally is effective in anesthesia and cervical dilatation with less bleeding and absence of abortion syndrome."( [Clinical observation of propofol combined with misoprostol for painless induced abortion].
Fan, GS; Jin, L; Li, H; Xi, S, 2005
)
0.84
"Sublingual misoprostol, when combined with mifepristone, is effective for medical abortion in the second trimester."( A prospective randomized comparison of sublingual and oral misoprostol when combined with mifepristone for medical abortion at 12-20 weeks gestation.
Chan, CC; Ho, PC; Kan, AS; Tang, OS, 2005
)
0.96
"To assess women's acceptability, the efficacy and side effects of sublingual versus vaginal administration of misoprostol in combination with mifepristone for medical abortion up to 13 weeks of gestation."( A randomised controlled trial of mifepristone in combination with misoprostol administered sublingually or vaginally for medical abortion up to 13 weeks of gestation.
Ashok, PW; Flett, GM; Hamoda, H; Templeton, A, 2005
)
0.78
"This study has evaluated the anti-inflammatory and analgesic responses of etoricoxib, a selective COX-2 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug combined with misoprostol in pre-clinical assays."( Anti-inflammatory and analgesic actions of etoricoxib (an NSAID) combined with misoprostol.
Carvalho, JC; do Amaral, BC; Moraes, BM; Morimoto, MS; Perazzo, FF; Vieira, LG, 2007
)
0.76
"Medical regimens using mifepristone in combination with prostaglandins have been widely available for women undergoing termination of pregnancy (TOP) at 10-16 weeks' gestation in China."( Mifepristone in combination with prostaglandins for termination of 10-16 weeks' gestation: a systematic review.
Chen, QJ; Cheng, LN; Hong, QQ; Hou, SP; Huang, YM; Meads, C; Zhu, HP, 2011
)
0.37
"Mifepristone combined with misoprostol for second-trimester abortion (MM) and intra-amniotic injection of ethacridine lactate (EL; Rivanol®) are the common methods for termination of second-trimester pregnancy in China."( Termination of second-trimester pregnancy by mifepristone combined with misoprostol versus intra-amniotic injection of ethacridine lactate (Rivanol®): a systematic review of Chinese trials.
Chen, OJ; Chen, QF; Cheng, LN; Fang, AH; Hou, SP; Huang, YM, 2011
)
0.9
"To compare the efficacy and safety of misoprostol and mifepristone combination with misoprostol alone in management of intrauterine death."( Comparison of mifepristone combination with misoprostol and misoprostol alone in the management of intrauterine death: condensation - misoprostol and mifepristone combination is more effective than misoprostol alone in the management of intrauterine death
Paul, A; Sharma, D; Singhal, SR, 2011
)
0.9
"This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of lower doses of mifepristone combined with misoprostol for the termination of ultra-early pregnancy."( Effectiveness and Safety of Lower Doses of Mifepristone Combined With Misoprostol for the Termination of Ultra-Early Pregnancy: A Dose-Ranging Randomized Controlled Trial.
Chen, DJ; Chen, WL; Li, CL; Liu, MX; Song, LP; Wang, Y; Zhang, ZF, 2015
)
0.86
" To monitor the misoprostol content during labor induction, a rapid, sensitive, and selective microElution solid phase extraction (μElution SPE) combined with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was developed."( Evaluating misoprostol content in pregnant women with hourly oral administration during labor induction by microElution solid phase extraction combined with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Chan, TM; Cheng, SY; Hung, CH; Lee, MR, 2015
)
1.15
"To assess the efficacy and safety of mifepristone combined with oral or vaginal misoprostol for termination of pregnancy between 8 and 16 weeks of gestation."( [Efficacy and safety of mifepristone combined with misoprostol for termination of pregnancy between 8 and 16 weeks of gestation].
Chang, Q; Di, W; Dong, B; Huang, Z; Jing, X; Li, Y; Qian, J; Ren, M; Shen, H; Shi, H; Song, W; Wu, S; Yao, C; Zheng, S, 2015
)
0.9
"Oral or vaginal misoprostol combined with mifepristone, is effective and safe for termination of pregnancy between 8 and 16 weeks of gestation."( [Efficacy and safety of mifepristone combined with misoprostol for termination of pregnancy between 8 and 16 weeks of gestation].
Chang, Q; Di, W; Dong, B; Huang, Z; Jing, X; Li, Y; Qian, J; Ren, M; Shen, H; Shi, H; Song, W; Wu, S; Yao, C; Zheng, S, 2015
)
1.01
"The aim of the present study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of low-dose mifepristone combined with self-administered misoprostol for termination of early pregnancy."( Early medical abortion with self-administered low-dose mifepristone in combination with misoprostol.
Li, CL; Mo, XT; Song, LP; Tang, SY; Zhou, LJ, 2018
)
0.91
"The BEGIN trial (buccal vs vaginal misoprostol combined with Foley catheter for cervical ripening at term) was an institutional review board-approved, randomized clinical trial conducted from June 2019 to January 2020 comparing identical doses (25 μg) of buccal misoprostol and vaginal misoprostol along with a Foley catheter for induction of labor."( Buccal vs vaginal misoprostol combined with Foley catheter for cervical ripening at term (the BEGIN trial): a randomized controlled trial.
Caplan, R; Gomez, HB; Hoffman, MK; Ruhstaller, K; Sciscione, AC; Young, MHH, 2021
)
1.23

Bioavailability

Misoprostol is a prostaglandin E1 analogue with oral bioavailability and immunosuppressive properties. The bioavailability of misoprostols is higher with the vaginal than the oral route. Water is added to the tablet before vaginal administration.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Pharmacokinetic and bioavailability studies of the combination product taken separately and together reveal a high between- and within-subject variability in plasma diclofenac levels, especially when the enteric-coated tablets were given after food; reliable values for peak plasma diclofenac concentration could not be ascertained."( Biopharmaceutical profile of diclofenac-misoprostol combination tablet, Arthrotec.
Karim, A; Smith, M, 1992
)
0.55
" It is concluded that new prostaglandin E1 analogues with oral bioavailability may have important applications to clinical transplantation in man, and may be cyclosporin sparing."( Immunosuppressive effect of misoprostol: a new synthetic prostaglandin E1 analogue.
Dumble, L; Moran, M; Pollak, R; Wiederkehr, JC, 1990
)
0.57
" We studied the immunosuppressive properties of new, synthetic, prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) methyl ester analogs (misoprostol, enisoprost) with oral bioavailability using an allogeneic in vitro immunoassay."( The immunosuppressive properties of new oral prostaglandin E1 analogs.
Dumble, LJ; Maddux, MS; Moran, M; Pollak, R; Wiederkehr, JC, 1990
)
0.49
"05), without significant changes in the rate of absorption (tmax = 14 +/- 8 [fasting] vs."( Effects of food and antacid on oral absorption of misoprostol, a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analog.
Karim, A; Kowalski, KG; Rozek, LF; Smith, ME, 1989
)
0.53
" Pharmacokinetic studies of the fixed combination have found that no drug-drug interaction occurs between misoprostol and diclofenac after either single or multiple doses, and the bioavailability of misoprostol and diclofenac are comparable with that of misoprostol and diclofenac given alone."( Efficacy and gastroduodenal safety of a fixed combination of diclofenac and misoprostol in the treatment of arthritis.
McKenna, F, 1995
)
0.73
" Misoprostol is a prostaglandin E1 analogue with oral bioavailability and immunosuppressive properties."( Misoprostol with cyclosporin A prolongs corneal allograft survival in an animal model.
Gothard, TW; Holland, EJ; Olsen, TW, 1996
)
2.65
"To determine the rate of bioavailability of oral misoprostol in the tablet and a new capsule form in women with term pregnancies in the postpartum period."( Oral misoprostol is rapidly absorbed in postpartum women at term.
Andolina, KL; Daly, S; Monzo, JM; Roberts, NS; Tolosa, JE, 2003
)
1.09
" A pharmacokinetic study has shown that sublingual misoprostol has the shortest onset of action, the highest peak concentration and the greatest bioavailability among the three routes of administration."( The pharmacokinetics and different regimens of misoprostol in early first-trimester medical abortion.
Ho, PC; Tang, OS, 2006
)
0.84
" Misoprostol has powerful uterotonic effects and, because it is well absorbed orally and sublingually, has the potential to be used more widely than would be possible with injectable uterotonics alone."( Misoprostol for the prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage.
Gülmezoglu, AM; Hofmeyr, GJ, 2008
)
2.7
"The peak plasma level of MPA after each dose of misoprostol is higher and the bioavailability is also greater after sublingual administration, compared with that after vaginal administration, of repeated doses of misoprostol."( Pharmacokinetics of repeated doses of misoprostol.
Ho, PC; Lee, SW; Schweer, H; Tang, OS, 2009
)
0.88
" The mean bioavailability measured as the area under the curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (C(max)) appeared higher in the control than in the BV group (1458."( Effect of bacterial vaginosis on the pharmacokinetics of misoprostol in early pregnancy.
Fiala, C; Gemzell-Danielsson, K; Sandström, A; Schweer, H; Sioutas, A; Watzer, B, 2012
)
0.62
" The absorption rate of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled lysozyme in the proximal intestine was higher than that for a marker of non-specific absorption, FD-10, and was suppressed by colchicine (endocytosis inhibitor)."( Intestinal absorption of lysozyme, an egg-white allergen, in rats: kinetics and effect of NSAIDs.
Hamura, K; Matsuo, H; Yokooji, T, 2013
)
0.39
" Misoprostol oral bioavailability is low and several authors have assessed whether the administration by other routes increased its pharmacodynamic effects."( [Pharmacology of misoprostol (pharmacokinetic data, adverse effects and teratogenic effects)].
Aubert, J; Bejan-Angoulvant, T; Jonville-Bera, AP, 2014
)
1.65
" The bioavailability of misoprostol is higher with the vaginal than the oral route, especially when water is added to the tablet before vaginal administration."( Misoprostol: serious cardiovascular events, even after a single dose.
, 2015
)
2.17
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51

Dosage Studied

Mifepristone 200 mg, followed on the same day by misoprostol 800 microg vaginally, effects abortion in women 50 to 63 days' gestation at rates comparable to regimens using longer dosing intervals. Sublingual or buccal miso should not enter clinical use until its safety and optimal dosage have been established by larger trials.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" The factors responsible for failure of adaptation are unknown but one clue is that there appears to be a dose-response effect relating anti-inflammatory dose and effectiveness of adaptation (i."( Gastric adaptation to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in man.
Graham, DY; Olivero, JJ, 1992
)
0.28
" during concomitant twice daily dosing with 400 micrograms misoprostol, 150 mg ranitidine or placebo."( Co-administration of misoprostol or ranitidine with indomethacin: effects on pharmacokinetics, abdominal symptoms and bowel habit.
Gibson, R; Kendall, MJ; Walt, RP, 1992
)
0.85
"A bilayer floating dosage unit is proposed to achieve local delivery of misoprostol, a prostaglandin E1 analogue, at the gastric mucosa level."( The bilayer floating capsule: a stomach-directed drug delivery system for misoprostol.
Franz, M; Möes, A; Oth, M; Timmermans, J, 1992
)
0.75
" All costs for drugs, ambulatory care, hospital care, loss of production, as well as other factors such as dosage and compliance, were transferred to Swedish conditions."( Cost-effectiveness of misoprostol in Sweden.
Haglund, U; Jönsson, B, 1992
)
0.6
" RPF was not consistently altered by subacute/chronic dosing of indomethacin, misoprostol, or the combination of the drugs."( Minimization of indomethacin-induced reduction in renal function by misoprostol.
Brown, JA; Hall, PS; Klassen, DK; Schubert, C; Stromatt, SC; Voss, TE; Weir, MR, 1991
)
0.74
" Omeprazole, which suppresses acid very effectively, may be problematic in the critically ill, limited by its oral dosage form, acid-labile properties, and potential drug interactions."( Controlling gastric pH: the impact of newer agents on the critically ill patient.
Earnest, DL, 1990
)
0.28
" In vitro misoprostol demonstrated significant dose-response inhibition of the mixed lymphocyte culture assay."( Immunosuppressive effect of misoprostol: a new synthetic prostaglandin E1 analogue.
Dumble, L; Moran, M; Pollak, R; Wiederkehr, JC, 1990
)
0.98
" In a dosage of 800 micrograms daily in two or four divided doses, misoprostol produced rates of complete ulcer healing in both gastric and duodenal ulcer patients significantly superior to placebo and comparable to H2 receptor antagonists."( Misoprostol: discovery, development, and clinical applications.
Collins, PW,
)
1.81
"Four consecutive patients with alcoholic cirrhosis and hepatorenal syndrome were treated with misoprostol, a synthetic methylester prostaglandin E1 analogue at twice the dosage advocated for anti-ulcer therapy (i."( Reversal of hepatorenal syndrome in four patients by peroral misoprostol (prostaglandin E1 analogue) and albumin administration.
De Groote, J; Fevery, J; Nevens, F; Van Cutsem, E; Van Steenbergen, W; Verberckmoes, R, 1990
)
0.74
" Considering the dose-response effects observed, the misoprostol action most likely represents a direct effect on the chief cell."( Effects of misoprostol on gastric pepsin secretion and human mucosal cell loss in man.
Quadros, E; Wilson, DE, 1990
)
0.92
"We studied the dose-response of focal gastric mucosal blood flow measured simultaneously by laser-Doppler flowmetry and hydrogen gas clearance in the canine chambered gastric segment to topical misoprostol (0."( The dose-response of canine focal gastric mucosal blood flow to misoprostol.
Gana, TJ; Koo, J; MacPherson, BR, 1989
)
0.71
" Ulcer-healing trials using four times daily dosing appear to parallel the antisecretory dose-response curve up to a dose of 200 micrograms qid."( Overview of misoprostol clinical experience.
Herting, RL; Nissen, CH, 1986
)
0.65
"The effect of misoprostol, a PGE1 methyl analogue, on the pregnant human uterus was unknown at dosage levels normally used in the treatment of gastric and duodenal ulceration."( [Effect of the PGE1 methyl analog misoprostol on the pregnant uterus in the first trimester].
Basse, H; Kiesel, L; Rabe, T; Runnebaum, B; Thuro, H, 1987
)
0.91
" No accumulation of misoprostol acid occurs in plasma following a 400 microgram q12h dosing regimen of misoprostol."( Antiulcer prostaglandin misoprostol: single and multiple dose pharmacokinetic profile.
Karim, A, 1987
)
0.9
" Hyperostosis of the marrow cavity in the sternum and femur was found predominantly in female mice of the medium (1,600 mcg/kg/day) and high dosage (16,000 mcg/kg/day) groups."( Hyperostosis of the marrow cavity caused by misoprostol in CD-1 strain mice.
Dodd, DC; Port, CD, 1987
)
0.53
" The plasma concentrations of propranolol under these steady state dosing conditions increased when misoprostol was added to propranolol."( Potential drug interactions with misoprostol: effects on the pharmacokinetics of antipyrine and propranolol.
Bennett, PN; Fenn, GC; Notarianni, LJ, 1988
)
0.77
" The results of 12 double-blind, randomized, placebo- and cimetidine-controlled trials involving 4000 patients have been reviewed here and show that misoprostol, given in a dosage of 800 micrograms daily in two or four divided doses, is able to produce rates of complete ulcer healing and pain relief in both gastric and duodenal ulcer which are significantly superior to placebo therapy and comparable to those achieved with high or conventional doses of cimetidine."( The therapeutic efficacy of misoprostol in peptic ulcer disease.
Akbar, FA; Hopkins, A; Watkinson, G, 1988
)
0.77
"The effects of two dosage levels of a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analogue, misoprostol, and cimetidine on short-term duodenal ulcer healing were compared in a double-blind, endoscopically controlled 4-week study."( Misoprostol, a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analogue, in the treatment of duodenal ulcers. A double-blind, cimetidine-controlled trial.
Mannion, G; Naiker, N; O'Keefe, SJ; Spitaels, JM, 1985
)
1.94
" This problem has been solved by pharmaceutical formulation studies which led to a stable and solid dosage form."( Chemistry and synthetic development of misoprostol.
Collins, PW; Dajani, EZ; Pappo, R, 1985
)
0.54
" In the single dosage range of 50-200 micrograms, misoprostol inhibits gastric acid secretion in a dose-related manner both in the basal state and after stimuli such as histamine and standard test meals."( Misoprostol clinical pharmacology. Establishment of activity in man.
Steiner, JA, 1985
)
1.97
"To compare the effectiveness and tolerability of three misoprostol dosing regimens for the prevention of gastric and duodenal ulcers associated with long-term nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy."( Misoprostol dosage in the prevention of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastric and duodenal ulcers: a comparison of three regimens.
Jackson, JE; Lies, RB; Raskin, JB; Stanton, DS; Tindall, EA; Weaver, AL; White, RH, 1995
)
1.98
"02) misoprostol dose-response effect was noted in the prevention of gastric ulcers."( Misoprostol dosage in the prevention of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastric and duodenal ulcers: a comparison of three regimens.
Jackson, JE; Lies, RB; Raskin, JB; Stanton, DS; Tindall, EA; Weaver, AL; White, RH, 1995
)
2.29
"To determine the mode of protective effects of misoprostol against the chronic gastrointestinal ulceration from the NSAID, diclofenac, studies were undertaken in domestic pigs, a model of human gastrointestinal ulceration, to determine (1) the effects of repeated daily dosing for 10 days of diclofenac 5 mg/kg/day twice a day (as Voltaren tablets) on the gastrointestinal morphology, 59fe-red blood loss, mucosal myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity (as an indicator of leukocyte infiltration), and mucosal leukotrienes (LTS); and (2) the mucosal protective effects of 10-40 micrograms/kg/day misoprostol twice a day (as Cytotec tablets) given with diclofenac 5 mg/kg/day twice a day compared with diclofenac 5 mg/kg/day alone and aspirin 150 mg/kg/twice a day (USP tablets) as a standard."( Chronic effects of misoprostol in combination with the NSAID, diclofenac, on gastrointestinal tract of pigs. Relation to diarrheagenic activity, leukocyte infiltration, and mucosal leukotrienes.
Perkins, WE; Rainsford, KD; Stetsko, PI, 1995
)
0.88
" Early trials to determine dosage are now being followed by larger studies of efficacy and side-effects."( Non-surgical abortion: who's for methotrexate?
Potts, M, 1995
)
0.29
"Misoprostol is more effective than intracervical PGE2 in bringing about labor and delivery, but further work is needed to determine the ideal dosing regimen."( Randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labor at term.
Gumina, R; Stubblefield, PG; Varaklis, K, 1995
)
2
" Patients were then randomised to receive a diclofenac 50mg/misoprostol 200 micrograms fixed combination tablet (n = 331) or diclofenac 50mg (n = 339) for 8 weeks at the same dosage frequency as in the open-label phase."( Efficacy of diclofenac/misoprostol vs diclofenac in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis.
McKenna, F, 1993
)
0.84
"The pharmacokinetics of a new diclofenac/misoprostol combination dosage form have been investigated."( Pharmacokinetics of diclofenac and misoprostol when administered alone or as a combination product.
Karim, A, 1993
)
0.83
" The drug dosage can be reduced, freeing the patient of the adverse reaction, but leaving behind a background activity adequate to produce a therapeutically beneficial effect."( A comparative overview of the adverse effects of antiulcer drugs.
Piper, DW, 1995
)
0.29
" If that is impossible, the NSAID dosage should be as low as possible, and the ulcer treated."( NSAID-induced gastrointestinal toxicity.
Goodman, T; Simon, LS, 1995
)
0.29
" Further studies to compare the safety of misoprostol to that of dinoprostone and to delineate an optimal dosing regimen for misoprostol are needed."( A comparison of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Goodwin, TM; Jones, MM; Paul, RH; Rahall, A; Wing, DA, 1995
)
0.9
" The daily dosage associated with the best risk/benefit ratio may be 400 micrograms/day."( [Misoprostol in the prevention of gastric erosions caused by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents].
Capron, MH; Delmas, PD; Lambert, R, 1994
)
1.2
" After 2 weeks of pretreatment with misoprostol or placebo, all patients concomitantly received CSA at an initial and maximum dosage of 5 mg/kg/day for 12 weeks."( Lack of a renal-protective effect of misoprostol in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving cyclosporin A. Results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Coblyn, JS; Germain, BF; Kremer, JM; Maier, AL; Wall, BA; Weinblatt, ME; Weisman, MH, 1994
)
0.84
"The results suggest that, in patients with well-compensated cirrhosis, the renal effects of misoprostol are determined by a bell-shaped dose-response curve."( Dose-dependent effects of oral misoprostol on renal function in alcoholic cirrhosis.
Dudley, F; Hsu, P; Massie, D; Wong, F, 1994
)
0.79
" During the course of the study, the dosage was successively reduced to 600, 400, and 200 micrograms."( The effectiveness of intravaginal misoprostol (Cytotec) in inducing abortion after eleven weeks of pregnancy.
Almeida, L; Bique, C; Bugalho, A; Faúndes, A,
)
0.41
" One month later, she repeated the dosage and experienced only spotting."( Congenital malformation of the scalp and cranium after failed first trimester abortion attempt with misoprostol.
Alencar, AJ; Fonseca, W; Misago, C; Pereira, RM, 1993
)
0.5
"Diclofenac/misoprostol at twice daily dosing is associated with significantly fewer gastroduodenal ulcers than either piroxicam or naproxen."( Double-blind comparison of efficacy and gastroduodenal safety of diclofenac/misoprostol, piroxicam, and naproxen in the treatment of osteoarthritis.
Bruyn, GA; Geis, GS; Melo Gomes, JA; Roth, SH; Woods, EM; Zeeh, J, 1993
)
0.91
" Unexpectedly, MISO increased the antiinflammatory effect of ASA at some dosage regimens."( Acetylsalicylic acid and misoprostol combination in adjuvant arthritis of rats.
Dizbay-Sak, S; Melli, M; Saray, A; Taşcilar, O, 1993
)
0.59
" The dosage was increased every 5 days by 200 micrograms until a total of 800 micrograms/d was achieved."( Synthetic prostaglandin E1 misoprostol as a treatment for tinnitus.
Briner, W; House, J; O'Leary, M, 1993
)
0.58
" In common with other fixed combination products, dosage flexibility is somewhat compromised with diclofenac/misoprostol."( Diclofenac/misoprostol. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in painful inflammatory conditions.
Davis, R; Goa, KL; Yarker, YE, 1995
)
0.89
" Vaginal misoprostol was given in a dosage of 800 micrograms in early second trimester."( Uterine evacuation by vaginal misoprostol after second trimester pregnancy interruption.
Bergstrom, S; Bique, C; Bugalho, A; Granja, AC; Pereira, C, 1996
)
1
"Our purpose was to compare two dosing regimens of vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening and induction of labor."( A comparison of differing dosing regimens of vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Paul, RH; Wing, DA, 1996
)
0.76
"Five hundred twenty-two patients with indications for induction of labor and unfavorable cervices were randomly assigned to one of two dosing regimens of vaginally administered misoprostol."( A comparison of differing dosing regimens of vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Paul, RH; Wing, DA, 1996
)
0.72
" The average interval from start of induction to vaginal delivery was shorter in the 3-hour dosing group (1311."( A comparison of differing dosing regimens of vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Paul, RH; Wing, DA, 1996
)
0.53
" Patients with the 6-hour dosing schedule had longer intervals to delivery, more frequently required oxytocin augmentation, and had more failed inductions than did patients with 3-hour dosing."( A comparison of differing dosing regimens of vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Paul, RH; Wing, DA, 1996
)
0.53
" Oral dosing of the methotrexate may offer advantages over parenteral dosing."( Oral methotrexate and vaginal misoprostol for early abortion.
Creinin, MD, 1996
)
0.58
", was given during the second week of each dosage regimen after three endoscopic biopsies had been taken from each of the duodenum, antrum and corpus."( Effects of misoprostol on healing and prevention of biopsy-induced gastroduodenal lesions occurring during the administration of diclofenac to volunteers.
Armstrong, D; Blum, AL; Dorta, G; Margalith, D; Nicolet, M; Saraga, E; Vouillamoz, D, 1996
)
0.68
"Because of the unpredictability of action of oral misoprostol, with incomplete abortion or heavy bleeding occurring prior to admission in three patients, we cannot recommend the dosage schedule evaluated here for routine clinical use."( A randomised comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before suction termination of pregnancy.
Lawrie, A; Penney, G; Templeton, A, 1996
)
0.81
" Rats were injected with indomethacin to reduce endogenous prostaglandin synthesis and dosed with prostaglandin analogues or prostacyclin."( Absorption, retention and urinary excretion of chromium-51 in rats pretreated with indomethacin and dosed with dimethylprostaglandin E2, misoprostol or prostacyclin.
Adeleye, BO; Davis-Whitenack, ML; Kamath, SM; Sangiah, S; Smith, MM; Stoecker, BJ, 1997
)
0.5
" Assuming that the pharmacologic effect of misoprostol is related to its concentration in the plasma, our observation of the prolonged serum concentrations in the vaginal group suggests that vaginal administration could be dosed at longer intervals than oral."( Absorption kinetics of misoprostol with oral or vaginal administration.
Banskter, D; Benowitz, NL; Darney, PD; Fong, SK; Zieman, M, 1997
)
0.87
" The most frequent indications for labor induction in both dosage groups were pregnancy-induced hypertension and premature rupture of the membranes."( Randomized trial of two doses of the prostaglandin E1 analog misoprostol for labor induction.
Del Valle, GO; Delke, I; Farah, LA; Gaudier, FL; Kaunitz, AM; Rosa, C; Sanchez-Ramos, L, 1997
)
0.54
" Additional studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to determine the optimal misoprostol dosage and frequency of administration."( Comparative study of intravaginal misoprostol with gemeprost as an abortifacient in second trimester missed abortion.
Eng, NS; Guan, AC, 1997
)
0.8
" Methylprednisolone sodium succinate was given at a dosage of 30 mg/kg of body weight prior to myelography, followed by a second full or half dose 2 to 4 hours later at clinician discretion."( Clinical evaluation of cimetidine, sucralfate, and misoprostol for prevention of gastrointestinal tract bleeding in dogs undergoing spinal surgery.
Bostwick, DR; Hanson, SM; Smith, MO; Twedt, DC, 1997
)
0.55
" The side effects associated with misoprostol may be dose related, and further studies to identify the optimum dosage and interval are needed."( A randomized clinical trial comparing misoprostol with prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
Borgida, AF; Gottschall, DS; Mihalek, JJ; Rodis, JF; Sauer, F, 1997
)
0.85
" Required first, however, is the determination of the correct dosage and frequency that will induce effective uterine contractions without producing uterine hyperstimulation and adverse effects on the fetal heart rate."( Methods of induction of labour.
el Refaey, H; Jauniaux, E, 1997
)
0.3
"To determine the optimal dosage and dosing interval for the use of misoprostol administered vaginally for pre-operative cervical dilatation."( A comparative study using two dose regimens (200 microg or 400 microg) of vaginal misoprostol for pre-operative cervical dilatation in first trimester nulliparae.
Fong, YF; Prasad, RN; Singh, K, 1998
)
0.76
" The use of 400 microg misoprostol with an evacuation interval of three hours appears to be the optimal dosage and evacuation time interval."( A comparative study using two dose regimens (200 microg or 400 microg) of vaginal misoprostol for pre-operative cervical dilatation in first trimester nulliparae.
Fong, YF; Prasad, RN; Singh, K, 1998
)
0.84
"This first report on the comparison of differing dosages and time intervals to determine the optimal dosage treatment schedule shows that the vaginal application of 400 microg misoprostol for at least three hours is optimal for pre-operative cervical dilatation before vacuum aspiration in first trimester nulliparae."( A comparative study using two dose regimens (200 microg or 400 microg) of vaginal misoprostol for pre-operative cervical dilatation in first trimester nulliparae.
Fong, YF; Prasad, RN; Singh, K, 1998
)
0.72
" There is a shorter interval to vaginal birth with vaginal application; however, the more frequent occurrence of fetal heart rate graph abnormalities in this group suggests that, until the optimal dosing interval for vaginal use is determined, the preferred route of misoprostol administration might be oral."( A masked randomized comparison of oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol for labor induction.
Bennett, KA; Butt, K; Crane, JM; Hutchens, D; Young, DC, 1998
)
0.71
"To determine the optimal dosage of vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before vacuum aspiration abortion."( Randomized trial to determine optimal dose of vaginal misoprostol for preabortion cervical priming.
Dong, F; Fong, YF; Prasad, RN; Singh, K, 1998
)
0.81
"Our purpose was to compare the efficacy 25 micrograms and 50 micrograms dosage of intravaginal misoprostol for labor induction in patients with an unfavorable cervix."( A comparison between 25 micrograms and 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol for labor induction.
Singchai, S; Srisomboon, J, 1998
)
0.75
" Shortening the dosing interval from 12 to 6 hours produced no significant benefit."( A comparison of two dosing regimens of intravaginal misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy termination.
Jain, JK; Kuo, J; Mishell, DR, 1999
)
0.55
"The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of two dosing regimens of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction."( A double-blind randomized trial of two dose regimens of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Adra, A; Beydoun, SN; Burkett, G; Diro, M; Gilles, JM; Nassar, A; O'Sullivan, MJ; Rodriguez, A; Salamat, SM; Yasin, SY,
)
0.6
" However, the significantly increased incidence of abnormal fetal heart rate tracings and the trend in increased deliveries for fetal distress with misoprostol dosing of 50 microgram every 4 hours are of concern."( Misoprostol is more efficacious for labor induction than prostaglandin E2, but is it associated with more risk?
Grullon, K; Kilpatrick, SJ; Kolderup, L; McLean, L; Safford, K, 1999
)
1.95
"Use of 400 microg misoprostol with a minimal evacuation time interval of three hours still appears the optimal dosage and evacuation time for cervical priming before first trimester termination of pregnancy."( Vaginal misoprostol for pre-abortion cervical priming: is there an optimal evacuation time interval?
Dong, F; Fong, YF; Prasad, RN; Singh, K, 1999
)
1.07
" This study is to determine the optimal dosage and route of administration of misoprostol for pre-operative cervical dilatation."( The use of misoprostol for pre-operative cervical dilatation prior to vacuum aspiration: a randomized trial.
Chan, YM; Ho, PC; Ngai, SW; Tang, OS, 1999
)
0.92
" A lower dosage of vaginal misoprostol (25 mcg 6-hourly) was less effective than a higher one (25 mcg 3-hourly), with reduced rates of uterine hyperstimulation."( Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.
Alfirevic, Z; Gülmezoglu, AM; Hofmeyr, GJ, 1999
)
2.04
" Multiple trials have proved that misoprostol is an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction in term pregnancy; however, investigations continue regarding the optimal dose, dosing regimen, and route of administration."( Labor induction with misoprostol.
Wing, DA, 1999
)
0.9
" PGE2 and misoprostol had bell-shaped dose-response curves: constriction by low doses of PGE2 and misoprostol (0."( Dilatation and constriction of rat gastric mucosal microvessels through prostaglandin EP2 and EP3 receptors.
Boku, K; Hayashi, H; Katori, M; Majima, M; Nishiyama, K; Ohno, T; Saeki, T; Saigenji, K, 1999
)
0.71
" However, the upper dosage limit of misoprostol through vaginal route has not been firmly established."( Precipitate delivery and postpartum hemorrhage after term induction with 200 micrograms misoprostol.
Chang, CC; Hsieh, YY; Hsu, TY; Tsai, HD; Yang, TC; Yeh, LS, 2000
)
0.8
"25 micrograms misoprostol is an efficient and safe dosage for labor induction in term pregnancy."( [The effect of 25 micrograms misoprostol on induction of labor in late pregnancy].
Li, L; Pu, L; Wang, H, 1998
)
0.95
") at a dosage of 300 or 450 mg/kg of body weight or subcutaneously (s."( Role of cytoprotectants and nitric oxide inhibition in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastroduodenal injury in the rat.
Albassam, MA; Lillie, LE; Macallum, GE; Percy, DH; Turner, PV, 2000
)
0.31
" Because misoprostol is not registered for such use, it has not undergone the extensive testing for appropriate dosage and safety required for registration."( Use of misoprostol in obstetrics and gynecology.
Song, J, 2000
)
1.18
"In the dosage used, misoprostol seems to be an effective agent for induction of labor in patients with an unfavorable cervix."( A randomized prospective study of misoprostol and dinoproston for induction of labor.
Belfrage, P; Eggebø, TM; Gjessing, L; Okland, I; Smedvig, E, 2000
)
0.91
" More trials are needed to find the right oral dosage that combines efficacy with safety."( A comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol tablets in induction of labour at term.
Danielian, P; Shetty, A; Templeton, A, 2001
)
0.59
"The efficacy of a new dosing regimen of misoprostol, a recently introduced labor-inducing agent, was studied."( Misoprostol in labor induction.
Kara, HF; Omak, M; Ozan, H; Tüfekçi, M; Uncu, G; Yildirim, V, 2001
)
2.02
"Although Misoprostol is an already widely used medication in gynecology and obstetrics, extended studies on dosage and safety are still missing."( [Adverse effects of misprostol in pregnancy].
Holzgreve, W; Hösli, I; Surbek, D; Züst, S,
)
0.55
" There has been endoscopically validated usefulness of employing enterosoluble and injectable dosage forms during the first days of NAID-therapy."( [Comparative efficacy of diclobrou for prophylaxis of NSAID-associated gastropathies in patients with osteoarthritis].
Bohomaz, VM; Dubovenko, ZO; Khomchenkova, NI; Kushyk, MF; Puzanova, OH; Svintsits'kyĭ, AS,
)
0.13
" This occurred either because a Bishop score of 8 or greater was achieved or because repeat dosing was disallowed secondary to the onset of uterine contractions."( The effect of a pill inserter on vaginal misoprostol dosing.
Chez, RA; Huffman, K; Parsons, MT; Politz, LB, 2001
)
0.58
" Prospective randomized studies are required to compare its efficacy and side effects with vaginal misoprostol and to work out the dosage and dosing interval."( Pilot study on the use of sublingual misoprostol for medical abortion.
Ho, PC; Tang, OS, 2001
)
0.8
" The dosing regimen was 400 microg as the initial dose followed by a second dose of 200 microg two hours later and then four-hourly 200 microg doses until delivery or 32 hours from commencement of treatment."( A randomised trial of oral versus vaginal administration of misoprostol for the purpose of mid-trimester termination of pregnancy.
Gilbert, A; Reid, R, 2001
)
0.55
" Pharmacokinetic studies and clinical trials are needed to find out the most appropriate dose, dosing interval and route of administration of misoprostol."( Pilot study on the use of repeated doses of sublingual misoprostol in termination of pregnancy up to 12 weeks gestation: efficacy and acceptability.
Ho, PC; Lee, SW; Miao, BY; Tang, OS, 2002
)
0.76
"To review the current literature concerning its efficacy, safety and dosage for induction of labor."( [New developments in labor induction].
Bar, J; Hod, M; Yulzari-Roll, V, 2002
)
0.31
"To estimate whether a dosage of 50 microg of misoprostol tablets moistened with 3% acetic acid and administered intravaginally is more efficacious for labor induction than a similar dosage regimen using dry tablets."( The effect of tablet moistening on labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol: a randomized trial.
Danner, CJ; Delke, I; Kaunitz, AM; Sanchez-Ramos, L, 2002
)
0.81
" Most of these women were placed on investigational protocols in which the dose of misoprostol administered was 25 to 50 microg and the dosing intervals ranged from 3 to 6 hours."( Factors affecting the likelihood of successful induction after intravaginal misoprostol application for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Paul, RH; Tran, S; Wing, DA, 2002
)
0.77
" However, debate continues regarding the optimal dose, dosage regimen, and route of administration."( A benefit-risk assessment of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labour induction.
Wing, DA, 2002
)
0.61
" The trials are evaluating the effectiveness of a 200 mg dosage of the drug and will continue until there is a commercial product."( Medical abortion options may advance in 1998.
, 1997
)
0.3
" This pilot study suggests that mifepristone 200 mg, followed on the same day by misoprostol 800 microg vaginally, effects abortion in women 50 to 63 days' gestation at rates comparable to regimens using longer dosing intervals between medications."( Mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol on the same day for abortion from 50 to 63 days' gestation.
Creinin, MD; Fox, MC; Harwood, B, 2002
)
0.84
" The new labeling does not contain claims regarding the efficacy and/or safety of Cytotec when it is used for cervical ripening for the induction of labor nor does it stipulate doses or dosing intervals."( ACOG Committee Opinion. Number 283, May 2003. New U.S. Food and Drug Administration labeling on Cytotec (misoprostol) use and pregnancy.
, 2003
)
0.53
" The new labeling does not contain claims regarding the efficacy and/or safety of Cytotec when it is used for cervical ripening for the induction of labor nor does it stipulate doses or dosing intervals."( ACOG committe opinion. New U.S. Food and Drug Administration labeling on Cytotec (misoprostol) use and pregnancy. Number 283, May 2003.
, 2003
)
0.54
" The histamine 2-receptor antagonist Famotidine in a high oral dosage is able to reduce the frequency of peptic lesions too, but not to the same degree as Misoprostol and proton pump inhibitors."( [Mucosa protective therapy with long-term nonsteroidal antirheumatic drugs].
Bauer, A; Cozzarini, W; Grusch, B; Györög, I; Györög, M; Höller, E; Maderbacher, H; Prenner, M; Rath, J; Sebesta, C; Trianto, T, 2003
)
0.52
" The median total dosage of misoprostol used was the same for both groups (1200 microg)."( Induction of labor with vaginal misoprostol for second trimester termination of pregnancy in the scarred uterus.
Chanarachakul, B; Herabutya, Y; Punyavachira, P, 2003
)
0.9
"Misoprostol in this dosing regimen is a safe method of labour induction."( A randomised trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for labour induction.
Kanhai, HH; LeCessie, S; Scherjon, S; van Gemund, N; van Leeuwen, JH; van Roosmalen, J, 2004
)
2.02
" The pre-operative dilatation was larger in multigravidae than in primigravidae in both dosage groups."( The use of oral misoprostol for pre-abortion cervical priming: a randomised controlled trial of 400 versus 200 microg in first trimester pregnancies.
Abdelnoor, M; Eskild, A; Jerve, F; Nesheim, BI; Oppegaard, KS, 2004
)
0.67
"To determine the optimal dosage and dosing interval for the use of misoprostol administered sublingually for pre-abortion cervical dilatation."( Sublingual misoprostol before first trimester abortion: a comparative study using two dose regimens.
Kumar, S; Mittal, S; Vimala, N, 2004
)
0.95
" The use of 400 mg misoprostol with an evacuation interval of two hours appears to be the optimal dosage and evacuation interval."( Sublingual misoprostol before first trimester abortion: a comparative study using two dose regimens.
Kumar, S; Mittal, S; Vimala, N, 2004
)
1.04
" There is no additional advantages of increasing the dosing interval upto three hours."( Sublingual misoprostol before first trimester abortion: a comparative study using two dose regimens.
Kumar, S; Mittal, S; Vimala, N, 2004
)
0.71
"Mifepristone 200 mg followed 6 to 8 hours later by misoprostol 800 microg vaginally is as effective for abortion and has significantly fewer side effects as compared with regimens using a 24-hour dosing interval."( A randomized comparison of misoprostol 6 to 8 hours versus 24 hours after mifepristone for abortion.
Chen, A; Creinin, MD; Fox, MC; Meyn, LA; Schaff, EA; Teal, S, 2004
)
0.87
"Women enrolled in four previous randomized trials involving oral or vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction were included in the present cohort study, with dosing of 25-50 microg every 4 to 6 h vaginally (n = 574) or 50 microg every 4 h orally (n = 207)."( Predictors of successful labor induction with oral or vaginal misoprostol.
Bennett, KA; Butt, KD; Crane, JM; Delaney, T; Hutchens, D; Young, DC, 2004
)
0.79
" Sublingual or buccal misoprostol should not enter clinical use until its safety and optimal dosage have been established by larger trials."( Buccal or sublingual misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
Hofmeyr, GJ; Muzonzini, G, 2004
)
0.96
" Intra-vaginal Misoprostol at the dosage administered is safe, effective and reduces staff workload."( Experience with intravaginal misoprostol in the management of intra-uterine fetal death.
Adekunle, AO; Arowojolu, AO; Fawole, AO; Otolorin, EO; Sotiloye, OS, 2004
)
0.97
"The purpose of this study to compare breast milk pharmacokinetics between misoprostol 200 mug and methylergometrine 250 mug after single oral dosing in women who require postpartum uterotonic therapy."( Misoprostol versus methylergometrine: pharmacokinetics in human milk.
Burkhardt, T; Rentsch, K; Schweer, H; Vogel, D; Von Mandach, U; Watzer, B; Zimmermann, R, 2004
)
2
"Misoprostol warrants further investigation as an alternative to postpartum methylergometrine because it enters and leaves breast milk at twice the rate, with one third of the milk/plasma ratio, which significantly lowers infant exposure and facilitates a timed dosing regimen."( Misoprostol versus methylergometrine: pharmacokinetics in human milk.
Burkhardt, T; Rentsch, K; Schweer, H; Vogel, D; Von Mandach, U; Watzer, B; Zimmermann, R, 2004
)
3.21
" After a change in dosage and route of administration, a further 20 women were managed with oral mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol (group two)."( Management of late intrauterine death using a combination of mifepristone and misoprostol--experience of two regimens.
Fairley, TE; Mackenzie, F; Mackenzie, M; Owen, P, 2005
)
0.76
" In addition, these events occurred earlier after initial misoprostol dosing (5."( Cardiotocographic abnormalities associated with dinoprostone and misoprostol cervical ripening.
Harris, D; Heise, RH; Meyer, L; Ogburn, PL; Ramin, KD; Ramsey, PS; Walkes, BA, 2005
)
0.81
" Misoprostol was used to induce abortion in all cases, and a variety of dosage regimens were used, the most frequent being 400 mug vaginally every 6 hours (71."( Misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy termination in women with a prior cesarean delivery.
Dickinson, JE, 2005
)
2.68
" It can be concluded that 50 microg of misoprostol applied in the posterior vaginal fornix every 4 hours is an effective dosage for labor induction and has less adverse effects and complications than the 100 microg dose."( [Comparative study of the effect of intravaginal misoprostol at 50 and 100 micrograms in cervical ripening and labor induction].
Guerra-Velásquez, M; Labarca-Vincero, N; Mejia-Montilla, J; Reyna-Villasmil, E; Reyna-Villasmil, N; Torres-Montilla, M, 2005
)
0.85
" The efficacy for abortion in association with mifepristone at a dosage of 400 microg/6 h is superior versus both placebo and gemeprost, but misoprostol is more painful and less effective than dilation and subsequent evacuation."( [Efficacy and safety of misoprostol in obstetrics].
Bermejo Vicedo, T; Capilla Montes, C,
)
0.64
" Designing and conducting further clinical trials to investigate appropriate dosage and administration routes, as well as the drug s adverse effect profile under such circumstances is essential, and would potentially allow an application for approval to be filed with health authorities regarding its use in obstetric practice."( [Efficacy and safety of misoprostol in obstetrics].
Bermejo Vicedo, T; Capilla Montes, C,
)
0.44
" Regimens with repeated dosing of misoprostol 800 microg pv warrant further study to find the optimal treatment protocol."( Misoprostol alone for early abortion: an evaluation of seven potential regimens.
Blanchard, K; Coyaji, K; Shochet, T; Thi Nhu Ngoc, N; Winikoff, B, 2005
)
2.05
"Vaginal misoprostol appears more effective than the equivalent dosage administered orally."( Oral, vaginal and sublingual misoprostol for induction of labor.
Barcaite, E; Bartusevicius, A; Nadisauskiene, R, 2005
)
1.05
"Misoprostol administered vaginally or rectally at a dosage of 400 microg following placental separation was not effective for decreasing postpartum bleeding in women without excessive hemorrhage."( Placebo-controlled randomized comparison of vaginal with rectal misoprostol in the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage.
Desdicioglu, R; Dittrich, R; Kaya, H; Ozkaya, O; Sezik, M, 2005
)
2.01
" Chemists knew mifepristone and misoprostol were prescription drugs but less about dosage and side effects."( Availability of medical abortion pills and the role of chemists: a study from Bihar and Jharkhand, India.
Ganatra, B; Manning, V; Pallipamulla, SP, 2005
)
0.61
"In Latin America, where restrictive laws limit women's access to safe abortion services, misoprostol is being used to induce abortions, often without correct information on dosage or regimens."( Reaching women with instructions on misoprostol use in a Latin American country.
Billings, D; Cohen, J; Goodyear, L; Llaguno, SE; Martinez, I; Ortiz, O, 2005
)
0.83
" But there is a lack of sufficient data regarding the optimal regime and safety and with incorrect dosing may lead to unacceptable high incidence of complications."( [Misoprostol and induction of labour].
Porozhanova, K; Porozhanova, V; Sampat, D, 2005
)
1.24
"This study examines bleeding pattern following medication-induced termination of pregnancy, comparing two different dosing schedules of mifepristone and misoprostol."( Bleeding after medication-induced termination of pregnancy with two dosing schedules of mifepristone and misoprostol.
Borgatta, L; Chen, AY; Mottl-Santiago, J; Vragovic, O; Wasserman, S, 2006
)
0.75
"One thousand eighty women with pregnancies up to 63 days' gestation were recruited for the study; 540 were randomized to the 6- to 8-h dosing schedule, and 540 were randomized to the 24-h dosing schedule."( Bleeding after medication-induced termination of pregnancy with two dosing schedules of mifepristone and misoprostol.
Borgatta, L; Chen, AY; Mottl-Santiago, J; Vragovic, O; Wasserman, S, 2006
)
0.55
" In addition, simultaneous dosing was highly acceptable."( Simultaneous very low dose mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol for medical abortion.
Borgatta, L; Ellis, SC; Kapp, N; Stubblefield, P, 2006
)
0.58
"16); the median dosage was almost the same (p=0."( Misoprostol for termination of second trimester pregnancy in a scarred uterus.
Momani, MD; Shammas, AG, 2006
)
1.78
" The lower dosage group received a median of 600 microg of vaginal misoprostol (min 600 microg to max 1000 microg)."( The use of vaginal misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy termination in women with previous single cesarean section.
Daponte, A; Dimopoulos, KD; Guidozzi, F; Nzewenga, G, 2006
)
0.9
" Few of the pharmacy staff (6% in the survey and 17% in the mystery client encounters) recommended a misoprostol dosing regimen that is potentially effective."( Pharmacy provision of medical abortifacients in a Latin American city.
Abuabara, K; Díaz-Olavarrieta, C; Grossman, D; Lara, D, 2006
)
0.55
" Studies of lower misoprostol dosing (starting dose of 25 microgram) did not show any differences in the outcomes of interest, but the sample size of this secondary analysis was small (304 women, 155 receiving misoprostol)."( Misoprostol compared with prostaglandin E2 for labour induction in women at term with intact membranes and unfavourable cervix: a systematic review.
Butler, B; Crane, JM; Hannah, ME; Young, DC, 2006
)
2.11
" The mean misoprostol dosage was 206 microg, with eight women (10."( Pilot study of labor induction with titrated oral misoprostol.
Chen, TC; Cheng, SY, 2006
)
0.99
"Titrated oral misoprostol is a safe and effective method of labor induction because the dosage can be adjusted according to individual response."( Pilot study of labor induction with titrated oral misoprostol.
Chen, TC; Cheng, SY, 2006
)
0.95
" The toxic dosage in humans is unknown, and there is no specific antidote."( Maternal death related to misoprostol overdose.
Ferreira, H; Graça, LM; Henriques, A; Lourenço, AV; Ribeirinho, A, 2007
)
0.64
"Mifepristone 200 mg and misoprostol 800 mcg vaginally used simultaneously is as effective for abortion as compared with regimens using a 24-hour dosing interval."( Mifepristone and misoprostol administered simultaneously versus 24 hours apart for abortion: a randomized controlled trial.
Bednarek, P; Creinin, MD; Lintu, H; Meyn, LA; Schreiber, CA; Wagner, MS, 2007
)
0.99
" In conclusion dosage dependent osteoinductive effect of misoprostol was shown in the early bone healing period."( Misoprostol enhances early fracture healing: a preliminary biochemical study on rats.
Colak, M; Eskandari, G; Milcan, A, 2007
)
2.03
" This raised concerns over the stability and applied dosage in the in-house infusion preparations."( Method to determine stability and recovery of carboprost and misoprostol in infusion preparations.
Chu, KO; Pang, CP; Rogers, MS; Wang, CC, 2007
)
0.58
" Misoprostol is the best suited prostaglandin for a number of reasons: it has a short half-life, few side effects, it is stable at room temperature, it is relatively cheap and the dosage can easily be adjusted according to the clinical need."( Cervical priming with misoprostol prior to transcervical procedures.
Fiala, C; Gemzell-Danielsson, K; Tang, OS; von Hertzen, H, 2007
)
1.56
" Administration of RBuOH at the same dosage (50, 100 and 200 mg/kg) reduced significantly (P<0."( Anti-ulcer, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities of the n-butanol fraction from Pteleopsis suberosa stem bark.
Biasini, T; Braca, A; D'Angelo, V; De Leo, M; De Pasquale, R; Germanò, MP; Miano, TC; Sanogo, R, 2008
)
0.35
" From September 2001, a flexible dosing interval of 1, 2 or 3 days between mifepristone and misoprostol was adopted."( Termination of early pregnancy using flexible, low-dose mifepristone-misoprostol regimens.
Heikinheimo, O; Leminen, R; Suhonen, S, 2007
)
0.79
"A flexible dosing protocol of mifepristone and misoprostol is effective; thus, its use is encouraged."( Termination of early pregnancy using flexible, low-dose mifepristone-misoprostol regimens.
Heikinheimo, O; Leminen, R; Suhonen, S, 2007
)
0.83
" Complications were otherwise comparatively minor and distributed equally between the two dosage groups."( Comparison of self-administered vaginal misoprostol versus placebo for cervical ripening prior to operative hysteroscopy using a sequential trial design.
Istre, O; Nesheim, BI; Oppegaard, KS; Qvigstad, E, 2008
)
0.61
" Participants were then randomly assigned to preinduction cervical ripening with a dinoprostone vaginal insert (10 mg) administered into the posterior fornix for a total of 12 hours without oxytocin (group I); with oxytocin (group II), and with misoprostol (50 microg) intravaginally in the posterior fornix with repeat dosing at 6-hour intervals with a maximum dose of four with oxytocin (group III)."( A prospective randomized trial of labor induction with vaginal controlled-release dinoprostone inserts with or without oxytocin and misoprostol+oxytocin.
Kaya, M; Kurt, I; Sener, T; Tanir, HM; Yildiz, C, 2008
)
0.73
" C was given per os in dosage 50 microg at 4 hours, the maximum dosage being 200 microg."( [Is it already time to legalize the usage of Cytotec (Misoprostol) in the obstetrics' practice?].
Bozhinova, S, 2007
)
0.59
" The author reaches the conclusion, that Cytotec is an effective and safe means for delivery (childbirth) induction, and that when dosage and application manner are set-up, the individual characterics of the patients should be taken into account."( [Is it already time to legalize the usage of Cytotec (Misoprostol) in the obstetrics' practice?].
Bozhinova, S, 2007
)
0.59
" The 50 microg dosing of misoprostol is safer than the 100 microg."( Methods of induction of labour at the University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, Maiduguri: a 4-year review.
Bako, BG; Obed, JY; Sanusi, I,
)
0.43
" However, many studies of medical management may underestimate success rates due to inconsistent inclusion criteria, different dosing regimens, and varying definitions of failed treatment."( Medical management of early pregnancy failure: efficacy.
Chen, BA; Creinin, MD, 2008
)
0.35
"Simultaneous use of mifepristone and misoprostol for second trimester medical abortion is not as effective as the regimen using a 36-38 h dosing interval."( A randomized trial to compare two dosing intervals of misoprostol following mifepristone administration in second trimester medical abortion.
Chai, J; Chen, QF; Cheng, LN; Ho, PC; Hong, QQ; Ng, E; Tang, OS, 2009
)
0.87
" The dosing regimen was 400 microg as the initial dose followed by 400 microg up to 3 doses (1200 microg) if needed in each group."( Vaginal versus oral misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy termination: a randomized trial.
Behrashi, M; Mahdian, M, 2008
)
0.67
"Daily administration of oral misoprostol over 3 days to women with prolonged pregnancies shortened time intervals from dosing to entry into active labor and delivery compared with placebo."( Outpatient oral misoprostol for prolonged pregnancies: a pilot investigation.
Gaffaney, CA; Morrison, EH; Nageotte, MP; Rumney, PJ; Saul, LL; Thomas, S; Wing, DA, 2009
)
0.99
" Dosage regimen was similar in both groups that was 200 microg 4 hours apart till expulsion of fetus or maximum of upto 5 doses."( Comparison of oral versus vaginal misoprostol for mid-trimester pregnancy termination.
Khawaja, NP; Rehman, R, 2009
)
0.63
"6% (n=25) of respondents; dosing regimens ranged from 50 to 200 microg as a single dose or repeated every 4-24 hours."( Physicians' approaches to post-abortion care in Manila, Philippines.
Burke, A; Cansino, C; Melgar, JL, 2010
)
0.36
"The efficacy of sublingual misoprostol in the dosage of 50 microg was comparable to 100 microg oral dose for the induction of labour in the primigravidas at term with pre-labour rupture of membranes."( Sublingual versus oral misoprostol for induction of labour in prelabour rupture of membranes at term.
Khawaja, NP; Malik, HZ; Rehman, R; Zahid, B, 2010
)
0.97
"The goal of this study was to compare three different medications for the induction of abortion in bitches between day 22 and 40 after mismating, to reduce the dosage and frequency of PGF2alpha applications and to investigate the effects of additional intravaginal applications of misoprostol, a PGE1 analog."( Intravaginal application of misoprostol improves pregnancy termination with cabergoline and alfaprostol in dogs.
Aslan, S; Beceriklisoy, HB; Cetin, Y; Macun, HC; Schäfer-Somi, S,
)
0.6
" If the sac was still intact or the thickness of the uterine cavity exceeded 30 mm, they were offered an additional dosage of intravaginal misoprostol or surgical uterine evacuation."( Early pregnancy failure: factors affecting successful medical treatment.
Bornstein, J; Kais, M; Maximovsky, O; Odeh, M; Ophir, E; Tendler, R, 2010
)
0.56
" Data including the induction-to-delivery interval and total dosage of misoprostol were recorded and analyzed."( Hourly oral misoprostol administration for terminating midtrimester pregnancies: a pilot study.
Cheng, SY; Hsue, CS; Hwang, GH; Pei, SC; Tsai, LC, 2010
)
0.97
" The median total dosage of misoprostol was 2,600 μg."( Hourly oral misoprostol administration for terminating midtrimester pregnancies: a pilot study.
Cheng, SY; Hsue, CS; Hwang, GH; Pei, SC; Tsai, LC, 2010
)
1.03
" The letrozole group received letrozole 10 mg daily for 3 days followed by 800 micrograms of vaginal misoprostol, while the placebo group received placebo for 3 days followed by the same dosage of misoprostol."( Misoprostol with or without letrozole pretreatment for termination of pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial.
Ho, PC; Lee, VCY; Ng, EHY; Yeung, WSB, 2011
)
2.03
" The same dosage was then repeated every 3 h if adequate uterine contractions were not achieved until 48 h after the initiation of misoprostol."( Randomized controlled study comparing misoprostol moistened with normal saline and with acetic acid for second-trimester pregnancy termination. Is it different?
Pongsatha, S; Tongsong, T, 2011
)
0.84
" Future research should prioritize misoprostol-only regimens with shorter dosing intervals."( Comparing two early medical abortion regimens: mifepristone+misoprostol vs. misoprostol alone.
Blum, J; Dabash, R; Diop, A; Nga, NT; Ngoc, NT; Raghavan, S; Winikoff, B, 2011
)
0.89
" Baseline uterine activity approximately doubled with 4 of the regimens and tripled with the highest dosage regimen (100 μg) (P < ."( A dose-finding study of oral misoprostol for labor augmentation.
Alexander, JM; Leveno, KJ; Lo, JY; McIntire, DD; Villano, KS, 2011
)
0.66
" Dosing every 3 h is superior to less frequent dosing, although intervals of up to 12 h are effective when using higher doses (600 or 800 mcg) of misoprostol."( Clinical guidelines. Labor induction abortion in the second trimester.
Borgatta, L; Kapp, N, 2011
)
0.57
"Misoprostol when given intravaginally in 50 mcg 4-hourly dosing regimen is an effective agent for ripening the cervix in this group of women."( Misoprostol for induction of labor in women with severe preeclampsia at or near term.
Al-Harazi, AH; Frass, KA; Shuaib, AA, 2011
)
3.25
" Fifteen percent of vendors recommended a potentially effective misoprostol dosing regimen."( How often and under which circumstances do Mexican pharmacy vendors recommend misoprostol to induce an abortion?
García, SG; Lara, D; Paz, F; Wilson, KS, 2011
)
0.84
"Both one- and two-day dosing intervals seem to be suitable for second trimester medical TOP, but women with no previous deliveries and those whose gestation exceeds 16 weeks may benefit from the longer interval."( One- and two-day dosing intervals between mifepristone and misoprostol in second trimester medical termination of pregnancy--a randomized trial.
Heikinheimo, O; Mentula, M; Suhonen, S, 2011
)
0.61
" Efficacy was evaluated 15 hours after misoprostol dosing began and the procedure was considered complete if uterine evacuation was achieved without recourse to surgical evacuation."( Mifepristone and misoprostol compared with misoprostol alone for second-trimester abortion: a randomized controlled trial.
Blum, J; Minh, NTH; Nga, NTB; Ngoc, NTN; Phan, VQ; Raghavan, S; Shochet, T; Winikoff, B, 2011
)
0.98
"Seven hundred forty one pregnancy terminations were performed using misoprostol with dosage varied from 50 mcg to 800 mcg, mostly 400 mcg intravagina every three hours."( Outcomes of pregnancy termination by misoprostol at 14-32 weeks of gestation: a 10-year-experience.
Pongsatha, S; Tongsong, T, 2011
)
0.88
" History of uncomplicated peptic ulcer and frequent dosing were additional factors associated with non-adherence to NSAIDs."( Prescription of and adherence to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and gastroprotective agents in at-risk gastrointestinal patients.
Gonzalez, MA; Lanas, A; Polo-Tomás, M; Roncales, P; Zapardiel, J, 2012
)
0.38
"The incidence of fever with misoprostol is related to both its dosage and route with the highest incidences found in the high-dose sublingual routes."( Risk of fever after misoprostol for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage: a meta-analysis.
Elati, A; Weeks, A, 2012
)
1
" The dosing and route of administration vary between the trials; however, there are quite consistent findings that not only does misoprostol administration not improve the ease of insertion of IUDs but it also leads to increased unpleasant side effects."( More harm than good: the lack of evidence for administering misoprostol prior to IUD insertion.
Reid, R; Waddington, A, 2012
)
0.83
"To explore the lowest effective dosage of mifepristone combined with misoprostol in terminating ultra-early pregnancy."( [The lowest dosages of mifepristone and misoprostol to terminate ultra-early pregnancy].
Chen, DJ; Du, PL; Li, CL; Liu, MX; Liu, Q; Sheng, XJ; Wei, M; Weng, HN, 2012
)
0.88
" All patients received 600 microg of vaginal misoprostol as primary dosage and then, were placed randomly in two groups consisting of 20 patients that received 400 microg of vaginal or oral misoprostol, every four hours, up to three doses."( Effects of vaginal versus oral misoprostol to terminate second-trimester pregnancy.
Bouzari, Z; Golsorkhtabar-Amiri, M; Yazdani, SH; Zeinalzadeh, M, 2012
)
0.92
" We found a doubling of TS events with any oxytocin, a dose-response correlation between oxytocin and TS, FHR changes occurring in a quarter of TS events and, finally, that presence of TS increases the chance of composite neonatal morbidity."( Tachysystole in term labor: incidence, risk factors, outcomes, and effect on fetal heart tracings.
Eller, AG; Esplin, MS; Henry, E; Heuser, CC; Holmgren, CM; Jackson, GM; Knight, S; Manuck, TA; Richards, D, 2013
)
0.39
" They were followed up after 24 h of last dosage of misoprostol or surgical intervention."( An approach to evaluate the efficacy of vaginal misoprostol administered for a rapid management of first trimester spontaneous onset incomplete abortion, in comparison to surgical curettage.
Bhattacharya, S; Bhattacharyya, SK; Dasgupta, M; Hasan, SH; Patua, B; Saha, S, 2013
)
0.9
" The majority (71%) of cases required a single administration of misoprostol, and the total dosage was lower in treatment A (mean: 98."( Misoprostol use under routine conditions for termination of pregnancies with intrauterine fetal death.
Alvarez, FS; Cunha, Ade A; Nascimento, MI; Nunes, GG; Oliveira, SR; Villas Bôas, EL,
)
1.81
"To compare the efficacy of a shorter interval (24hours) between misoprostol and mifepristone administration with that of the conventional dosing interval (48hours) for second-trimester termination of pregnancy (TOP)."( Dosing interval of 24hours versus 48hours between mifepristone and misoprostol administration for mid-trimester termination of pregnancy.
Chaudhuri, P; Das, C; Mandal, A; Mazumdar, A, 2014
)
0.88
"The rate of successful abortions was similar with the 24-hour and 48-hour dosing intervals (95."( Dosing interval of 24hours versus 48hours between mifepristone and misoprostol administration for mid-trimester termination of pregnancy.
Chaudhuri, P; Das, C; Mandal, A; Mazumdar, A, 2014
)
0.64
"The 24-hour dosing interval between misoprostol and mifepristone administration seems to be as effective as the 48-hour dosing interval for second trimester TOP."( Dosing interval of 24hours versus 48hours between mifepristone and misoprostol administration for mid-trimester termination of pregnancy.
Chaudhuri, P; Das, C; Mandal, A; Mazumdar, A, 2014
)
0.91
" The challenge is to provide this medication with the correct dosing for this indication and with the ability to discontinue the medication if needed, all while ensuring essential maternal and neonatal safety."( Misoprostol vaginal insert for induction of labor: a delivery system with accurate dosing and rapid discontinuation.
Hawkins, JS; Powers, BL; Stephenson, ML; Wing, DA, 2014
)
1.85
" Guidelines regarding cervical ripening are heterogeneous in terms of molecules, administration route, dosage or surveillance."( [Survey on cervical ripening practices in France].
Bel, S; Fritz, G; Gaudineau, A; Langer, B; Sananes, N; Zorgnotti, L, 2014
)
0.4
" It is not possible to recommend a specific dosing schedule."( [Use of misoprostol for induction of labor in case of fetal death or termination of pregnancy during second or third trimester of pregnancy: Efficiency, dosage, route of administration, side effects, use in case of uterine scar].
Chauvet, A; Clouqueur, E; Coulon, C; Deruelle, P; Houfflin-Debarge, V; Subtil, D; Vaast, P, 2014
)
0.84
"To compare the efficacy and safety of two misoprostol dosing regimens for induction of labour in primiparous (1P) and multiparous (>1P) women."( Maternal and neonatal outcome of labour induction at term comparing two regimens of misoprostol.
Krähenmann, F; Kreft, M; Kurmanavicius, J; Ochsenbein-Kölble, N; Roos, M; Zimmermann, R, 2014
)
0.89
" As induction of labour is an off-label use for misoprostol, safety should be prioritised with the lower dosage regimen despite the longer induction-to-delivery interval."( Maternal and neonatal outcome of labour induction at term comparing two regimens of misoprostol.
Krähenmann, F; Kreft, M; Kurmanavicius, J; Ochsenbein-Kölble, N; Roos, M; Zimmermann, R, 2014
)
0.88
"To compare the effectiveness of two dosing regimens of vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour."( Randomization of two dosing regimens of vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction in a low resource setting.
Adeniji, AO; Adeniyi, AA; Aimakhu, CO; Enakpene, C; Odukogbe, AA; Oladokun, O; Olayemi, A,
)
0.63
"Myometrial strips obtained from labouring (with or without oxytocin augmentation) and non-labouring women undergoing Cesarean deliveries were subjected to a dose-response testing with oxytocin, ergonovine, PGF2α, or misoprostol (10(-10) M to 10(-5) M)."( Comparative efficacy of uterotonic agents: in vitro contractions in isolated myometrial strips of labouring and non-labouring women.
Balki, M; Carvalho, JC; Erik-Soussi, M; Kingdom, J, 2014
)
0.59
" The results for vaginal birth not achieved in 24 hours, uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate (FHR) changes, and caesarean section were highly heterogenous - for uterine hyperstimulation with FHR changes this was related to dosage with lower rates in those with lower doses of oral misoprostol."( Oral misoprostol for induction of labour.
Aflaifel, N; Alfirevic, Z; Weeks, A, 2014
)
1.09
" Standardised evaluation of pain is needed and the correlation between the dosage of misoprostol and the intensity of pain must be assessed in future studies."( Pain during medical abortion, the impact of the regimen: a neglected issue? A review.
Bombas, T; Cameron, S; Fiala, C; Gemzell-Danielsson, K; Parachini, M; Saya, L, 2014
)
0.63
" Exposed tablets also exhibited a decrease in Cytotec active ingredient dosage (-5."( Instability of misoprostol tablets stored outside the blister: a potential serious concern for clinical outcome in medical abortion.
Berard, V; Bombas, T; Cameron, S; Fiala, C; Gemzell-Danielsson, K; Parachini, M, 2014
)
0.76
" Correct information about the number of pills to use and dosage intervals was the least easy to obtain and caused concerns."( Women's experiences with the use of medical abortion in a legally restricted context: the case of Argentina.
Aizenberg, L; Ramos, S; Romero, M, 2015
)
0.42
" While good profiles of contraceptive use are available for many countries and we have good technical data on the MA drugs' efficacy, dosages and regimens such as home dosage of misoprostol versus clinic dosage, we have very little information about the quantities of MA drugs sold, how they are used, where they are used, and, in the case of misoprostol, for what purposes."( Medical abortion: the hidden revolution.
Harvey, P, 2015
)
0.61
" Although there are currently no pharmacogenomic findings that affect dosing of either prostaglandins or oxytocin, this is a growing area of research."( Pharmacotherapy options for labor induction.
Sheibani, L; Wing, DA, 2015
)
0.42
" Based on previous studies, we envision that small and frequent oral dosage of misoprostol is an effective method for labor induction."( Evaluating misoprostol content in pregnant women with hourly oral administration during labor induction by microElution solid phase extraction combined with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
Chan, TM; Cheng, SY; Hung, CH; Lee, MR, 2015
)
1.03
"The total misoprostol dosage used was 1160 μg and 560 μg (p< 0."( Misoprostol versus misoprostol and foley catheter combination in 2nd trimester pregnancy terminations.
Bakacak, M; Ercan, Ö; Köstü, B; Özer, A; Serin, S, 2016
)
2.28
"The misoprostol + foley catheter combination reduces the total dosage of misoprostol required for termination and shortens the termination interval, thereby increasing patient's comfort."( Misoprostol versus misoprostol and foley catheter combination in 2nd trimester pregnancy terminations.
Bakacak, M; Ercan, Ö; Köstü, B; Özer, A; Serin, S, 2016
)
2.44
" It is difficult to conduct a randomised control trial to address this issue due to limited number of patients and therefore no drug or dosage can be recommended with certainty."( How much misoprostol is safe? - First reported case of second-trimester uterine rupture after a single low dose.
Datta, S; Minocha, S, 2016
)
0.85
" The dosing regimens differed in terms of dose, number of administrations and route of administration in the different trials."( Cervical ripening before first trimester surgical evacuation for non-viable pregnancy.
Grivell, RM; Webber, K, 2015
)
0.42
" Our study also showed that labor induction of women with cervix Bishop score ≤3 needed increased dosage of misoprostol solution."( Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy.
He, T; Li, X; Ma, Q; Qin, L; Wang, X; Yang, A, 2016
)
0.92
" The primary pharmacokinetic parameters measured were the area under the plasma misoprostol acid concentration-time curve (AUC) from dosing to last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t), the AUC from 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞) and the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax)."( A crossover pharmacokinetic study of misoprostol by the oral, sublingual and buccal routes.
Byrne, ME; Frye, LJ; Winikoff, B, 2016
)
0.93
" The effectiveness of treatment methods and the optimal dosage of misoprostol are research priorities."( Preventing deaths due to haemorrhage.
Hofmeyr, GJ; Qureshi, Z, 2016
)
0.67
" Misoprostol dosing was the same for obese and non-obese women."( Prostaglandin versus mechanical dilation and the effect of maternal obesity on failure to achieve active labor: a cohort study.
Beckwith, L; Kritzer, S; Magner, K; Warshak, CR, 2017
)
1.37
" Median misoprostol dosing time was shorter in the 24-hour interval arm (7."( Simultaneous Administration Compared With a 24-Hour Mifepristone-Misoprostol Interval in Second-Trimester Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Abbas, DF; Blum, J; Chi, HT; Martin, R; Nga, NT; Ngoc, NT; Winikoff, B, 2016
)
1.11
" Simultaneous dosing results in less total time from the first clinical contact to complete abortion."( Simultaneous Administration Compared With a 24-Hour Mifepristone-Misoprostol Interval in Second-Trimester Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Abbas, DF; Blum, J; Chi, HT; Martin, R; Nga, NT; Ngoc, NT; Winikoff, B, 2016
)
0.67
" Larger studies are needed to investigate the safety profile of a Foley catheter compared to separate dosing and administration regimens of misoprostol."( Induction of Labor Using a Foley Catheter or Misoprostol: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Bloemenkamp, KW; Mast, K; Mol, BW; Ten Eikelder, ML; van der Velden, A, 2016
)
0.9
"The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and acceptability of a regimen using mifepristone and buccal misoprostol with unlimited dosing for second trimester abortion in Armenia."( Second trimester medical abortion with mifepristone followed by unlimited dosing of buccal misoprostol in Armenia.
Abrahamyan, R; Avagyan, G; Chong, E; Louie, KS; Tsereteli, T; Winikoff, B, 2017
)
0.89
" Recent studies on the continuous dosing of misoprostol have produced critical evidence to support continued dosing until expulsion."( Update on second trimester medical abortion.
Lerma, K; Shaw, KA, 2017
)
0.72
" Further research is needed to refine second trimester medical abortion methods, specific to the mifepristone, misoprostol dosing interval."( Update on second trimester medical abortion.
Lerma, K; Shaw, KA, 2017
)
0.67
"The addition of mifepristone to medical treatment regimens for first trimester miscarriage significantly decreased the need for repeat medical dosing and surgical curettage."( Combination therapy with mifepristone and misoprostol for the management of first trimester miscarriage: Improved success.
Dunford, A; Fyfe, R, 2018
)
0.75
"The survey found that 99% of pharmacy workers visited had knowledge of MR procedures but only two-thirds (67%) could state the legal time limit correctly; they mentioned misoprostol (86%) over mifepristone-misoprostol combination (78%) as a procedure of MR with medication (MRM); 36% reported knowing the recommended dosage of mifepristone-misoprostol combination; 70% reported providing information on effectiveness of the medicines; 50% reported recommending at least one follow-up visit to them; 63% reported explaining possible complications of using the medications; and 47% reported offering any post-MR contraception to their clients."( Provision of menstrual regulation with medication among pharmacies in three municipal districts of Bangladesh: a situation analysis.
Ahmed, A; Ahmmed, F; Al Haque, N; Alam, A; Huda, FA; Karim, F; Mahmood, HR; Sarker, BK, 2018
)
0.68
"We found knowledge gaps regarding recommended dosage for MRM and inconsistent practice in informing women on effectiveness, follow-up visits, possible complications and provision of post-MR contraceptives among the pharmacy workers, particularly during the mystery client visits."( Provision of menstrual regulation with medication among pharmacies in three municipal districts of Bangladesh: a situation analysis.
Ahmed, A; Ahmmed, F; Al Haque, N; Alam, A; Huda, FA; Karim, F; Mahmood, HR; Sarker, BK, 2018
)
0.48
"This was a qualitative study in 2015-2016 among women who had experienced complications after use of misoprostol, with or without additional methods, for abortion; what information they received before use; what dosage and regimens they used; what complications they experienced; and what treatment they received postuse."( Complications with use of misoprostol for abortion in Madagascar: between ease of access and lack of information.
Mattern, C; Pourette, D; Raharimalala, P; Ratovoson, R, 2018
)
1
" Our primary outcome was treatment success with simultaneous dosing compared with a regimen with a 24- to 48-hour interval between medications."( Simultaneous Compared With Interval Medical Abortion Regimens Where Home Use Is Restricted.
Aiken, ARA; Lohr, PA; Scott, JG; Starling, JE, 2018
)
0.48
" Overall success rates were high with both regimens but lower with simultaneous than with interval dosing (94."( Simultaneous Compared With Interval Medical Abortion Regimens Where Home Use Is Restricted.
Aiken, ARA; Lohr, PA; Scott, JG; Starling, JE, 2018
)
0.48
" Pragmatic use of simultaneous dosing is reasonable given the small difference in effectiveness."( Simultaneous Compared With Interval Medical Abortion Regimens Where Home Use Is Restricted.
Aiken, ARA; Lohr, PA; Scott, JG; Starling, JE, 2018
)
0.48
"In this first randomized controlled trial in the literature to compare a single with a multiple dosing of misoprostol, we found that the 1-dose regimen is an acceptable alternative for the induction for labor, especially for multiparous women and for patients with a Bishop score >4 after the first dose."( Induction of labor using one dose vs multiple doses of misoprostol: a randomized controlled trial.
Arabkhazaeli, M; Bernstein, PS; Kapedani, A; Moon, JY; Pimentel, VM; Tropper, PJ; Wang, A, 2018
)
0.94
" Misoprostol route and dosing were collected."( Buccal versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Term Induction of Labor: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Daggy, J; Dorr, ML; Haas, DM; Pierson, RC; Quinney, SK, 2019
)
1.74
"We found no significant differences in time to delivery or other labor outcomes between buccal or vaginal dosing of misoprostol in women undergoing labor induction at term."( Buccal versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Term Induction of Labor: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Daggy, J; Dorr, ML; Haas, DM; Pierson, RC; Quinney, SK, 2019
)
1.04
" Multiple factors were significantly associated with this proportion, including misoprostol amount per dose and route of administration, loss to follow-up rate, publication date, geographic region, number of misoprostol doses, duration of dosing, and time between dosing and evaluation."( Efficacy of Misoprostol Alone for First-Trimester Medical Abortion: A Systematic Review.
Harrison, MS; Raymond, EG; Weaver, MA, 2019
)
1.12
" All women who presented with first trimester missed abortion were invited to participate in the study and were randomised to one of two groups: one group received sublingual misoprostol in three doses of 800 μg every 4 h, while a second group received vaginal misoprostol in the same dosage regimen."( Sublingual vs vaginal misoprostol for completion of first trimester missed abortion: a randomised controlled trial.
Abbas, AM; Abd El-Razek, M; Abdelshafy, A; Abo-Gamra, A; Alanwar, A; Awwad, H; Elkotb, AM; Shahin, M, 2019
)
1.02
" The results of the present study do not support the use of this gel at this dosage for the treatment of wounds in Brook Trout."( Effect of a Misoprostol/Phenytoin Gel on Experimentally Induced Wounds in Brook Trout-A Preliminary Study.
Coutant, T; Lair, S; Vergneau-Grosset, C, 2019
)
0.89
"To compare the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended orally administrated dosage of misoprostol (25 μg) with a vaginal slow-release (7 μg/hour) insert of misoprostol regarding time from induction to delivery and safety of the method."( Slow-release vaginal insert of misoprostol versus orally administrated solution of misoprostol for the induction of labour in primiparous term pregnant women: a randomised controlled trial.
Friman-Mathiasson, M; Gemzell-Danielsson, K; Jarnbert-Pettersson, H; Pilo, C; Strandberg, M; Wallström, T; Wiberg-Itzel, E, 2019
)
1.02
" Finding an optimal route of misoprostol dosing for efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction is important and not well studied for the buccal route."( A comparison of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for cervical ripening in women for labor induction at term (the IMPROVE trial): a triple-masked randomized controlled trial.
Bhamidipalli, SS; Bonsack, C; Daggy, J; Dorr, ML; Flannery, KM; Haas, DM; Head, A; Lathrop, A; Morgan, S; Ngo, N; Pierson, RC; Quinney, SK; Towns, R, 2019
)
1.08
"Quality of information provided to client purchasing medication abortion was low, especially related to timing and dosing of misoprostol (18% of pharmacists knew correct timing) and side effects (31% not telling any information on side effects)."( Knowledge, provision of information and barriers to high quality medication abortion provision by pharmacists in Uttar Pradesh, India.
Diamond-Smith, N; Dwivedi, P; Percher, J; Saxena, M; Srivastava, A, 2019
)
0.72
" Standard procedure at North Zealand Hospital changed in 2016 from a dosage of 50 µg oral misoprostol 2-3 times daily, to 25 µg up to 8 times daily."( Induction of labor with high- or low-dosage oral misoprostol-A Danish descriptive retrospective cohort study 2015-16.
Andersen, BR; Bendix, JM; Bødker, B; Friis Petersen, J; Løkkegaard, EC, 2020
)
1.03
" In accordance with the misoprostol dosing recommendations by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO), the incidences of uterine rupture and cervical laceration are relatively high in Chinese pregnant women."( Clinical application of low-dose misoprostol in the induced labor of 16 to 28 weeks pathological pregnancies (a STROBE-compliant article).
Du, X; Duan, J; Huang, YM; Wang, Y; Yang, Y, 2019
)
1.1
" Some evidence shows the feasibility of same-day cervical preparation before D&E at 20-24 weeks using Dilapan-S® with adjunctive misoprostol or serial repeat dosing of misoprostol, but same-day preparation should be limited to providers with significant experience with these regimens."( Society of Family Planning clinical recommendations: Cervical preparation for dilation and evacuation at 20-24 weeks' gestation.
Diedrich, JT; Drey, EA; Newmann, SJ, 2020
)
0.76
" A common evidence-based medical regimen for early pregnancy loss uses misoprostol, a prostaglandin E1 analog, with a dosage of 800 μg, self-administered vaginally."( Management of early pregnancy loss with mifepristone and misoprostol: clinical predictors of treatment success from a randomized trial.
Atrio, JM; Creinin, MD; Koelper, N; McAllister, A; Sammel, MD; Schreiber, CA; Sonalkar, S, 2020
)
1.04
" Among visits which included discussion of misoprostol, two out of five sellers provided dosage instructions with most recommending the minimum adequate dosage."( What does informal access to misoprostol in Colombia look like? A mystery client methodology in Bogotá and the Coffee Axis.
Blades, N; Moore, AM; Ortiz, J; Villarreal, C; Whitehead, H, 2020
)
1.11
" There was no significant difference in dosing intervals between mifepristone and misoprostol and routes of misoprostol administration in combination or misoprostol alone regimens."( Medical termination for pregnancy in early first trimester (≤ 63 days) using combination of mifepristone and misoprostol or misoprostol alone: a systematic review.
Abubeker, FA; Kim, C; Lavelanet, A; Rodriguez, MI, 2020
)
1
"Both 1- and 2-day dosing intervals between mifepristone and misoprostol are suitable for clinical use for second-trimester medical termination of pregnancy."( Different dosing intervals of mifepristone-misoprostol for second-trimester termination of pregnancy: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
Chen, M; Song, L; Wei, T; Wu, L; Xiong, W; Yan, A; Zeng, M; Zhang, J; Zu, Q, 2021
)
1.13
" Midwives described a wide range of dosage schedules concerning application intervals, starting doses, and the maximum daily dose of misoprostol."( Heterogenous use of misoprostol for induction of labour: results of an online survey among midwives in German-speaking countries.
Bossung, V; Rath, W; Rody, A; Schwarz, C, 2021
)
1.15
" The preparation and dosage of misoprostol vary significantly among hospitals and do not adhere to international guidelines."( Heterogenous use of misoprostol for induction of labour: results of an online survey among midwives in German-speaking countries.
Bossung, V; Rath, W; Rody, A; Schwarz, C, 2021
)
1.23
" Women received the vaginal misoprostol dosage of 200 or 800 μg,10-12 h before operative hysteroscopy."( Comparison between 200 μg and 800 μg of vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening before operative hysteroscopy: A randomized controlled trial.
da Costa, AAR; Maior, MDCFS; Souza, ASR; Souza, GFA, 2022
)
1.27
" Proper and supervised use of misoprostol in the appropriate dosage can avoid life-threatening consequences of uterine rupture."( A Rare Type of Uterine Rupture Following Over-the-Counter Use of Misoprostol in Second Trimester Abortion.
Jha, AK; Jha, N; Sagili, H; Sharma, J, 2021
)
1.15
" Off-label misoprostol is recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for IOL but preparing it into doses suitable for IOL lacks precision, with potential adverse outcomes if dosing is inaccurate."( Oral misoprostol tablets (25 µg) for induction of labor: a targeted literature review and cost analysis.
Devlieger, R; Heus, R; Padgett, K; Perrotin, F; Poinas, AC,
)
1.04
"A higher dosage protocol of orally administered misoprostol significantly reduces the mean induction-delivery interval without increasing the risk for an adverse maternal or fetal outcome."( Oral Misoprostol for the Induction of Labor: Comparison of Different Dosage Schemes With Respect to Maternal and Fetal Outcome in Patients Beyond 34 Weeks of Pregnancy.
Abel, JS; DI Liberto, A; Eichler, C; Ertan, AK; Gilman, E; Grüttner, B; Ludwig, S; Mallmann, MR; Mallmann, P; Morgenstern, B; Ratiu, D; Ratiu, O; Thangarajah, F,
)
0.9
" The optimal dosing of ibuprofen is unclear, but a single dose of ibuprofen 1600 mg was shown to be effective, and it was less certain whether 800 mg was effective."( Pain management for medical abortion before 14 weeks' gestation.
Cameron, S; Morroni, C; Reynolds-Wright, JJ; Woldetsadik, MA, 2022
)
0.72
" To assess label comprehension, we developed 11 primary and 13 secondary communication objectives related to indications for use, eligibility, dosing regimen, contraindications, warning signs, side effects, and recognizing the risk of treatment failure, with corresponding target performance thresholds (80-90% accuracy)."( Comprehension of an Over-the-Counter Drug Facts Label Prototype for a Mifepristone and Misoprostol Medication Abortion Product.
Biggs, MA; Blanchard, K; Bustamante, CK; Choimorrow, SY; Ehrenreich, K; Grossman, D; Hauser, D; Hernandez, Y; Kapp, N; Kromenaker, T; Moayedi, G; Morris, N; Perritt, JB; Ralph, L; Raymond, EG; Valladares, ES; White, K, 2022
)
0.94
" The overall sample met performance criteria for 10 of the 11 primary communication objectives (93-99% correct) related to indications for use, eligibility for use, the dosing regimen, and contraindications; young people met nine and people with limited literacy met eight of the 11 performance criteria."( Comprehension of an Over-the-Counter Drug Facts Label Prototype for a Mifepristone and Misoprostol Medication Abortion Product.
Biggs, MA; Blanchard, K; Bustamante, CK; Choimorrow, SY; Ehrenreich, K; Grossman, D; Hauser, D; Hernandez, Y; Kapp, N; Kromenaker, T; Moayedi, G; Morris, N; Perritt, JB; Ralph, L; Raymond, EG; Valladares, ES; White, K, 2022
)
0.94
" The optimal dosing of ibuprofen is unclear, but a single dose of ibuprofen 1600mg was shown to be effective and it was less certain whether 800mg was effective."( Pain management for medical abortion before 14 weeks' gestation: A systematic review.
Cameron, ST; Morroni, C; Reynolds-Wright, JJ; Woldetsadik, MA, 2022
)
0.72
"Buccal and vaginal dosing of misoprostol for cervical ripening in nulliparas appear to have similar times to active labor and progression of cervical change during ripening."( Cervical change times during induction in nulliparas using vaginal or buccal misoprostol.
Bhamidipalli, SS; Daggy, J; Flannery, KM; Grasch, JL; Haas, DM; Quinney, SK; Yang, Z, 2022
)
1.24
" Lowering of the misoprostol dosage with prior CS may reduce uterine rupture, although this hypothesis requires ongoing research."( Mifepristone priming and subsequent misoprostol for second trimester medical abortion in women with previous caesarean delivery.
Dickinson, JE; Doherty, DA, 2023
)
1.52
" The optimal dosing of prostaglandin to achieve the highest efficacy with the lowest proportion of complications remains to be established."( Medical abortion in the second trimester - an update.
Kopp Kallner, H, 2023
)
0.91
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Protein Targets (35)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
regulator of G-protein signaling 4Homo sapiens (human)Potency26.67950.531815.435837.6858AID504845
arylsulfatase AHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.67461.069113.955137.9330AID720538
euchromatic histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2Homo sapiens (human)Potency28.18380.035520.977089.1251AID504332
hexokinase-4 isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency39.81072.511913.800328.1838AID743207
chromobox protein homolog 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency19.95260.006026.168889.1251AID488953
glucokinase regulatory proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency39.81072.511913.800328.1838AID743207
DNA polymerase kappa isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency26.67950.031622.3146100.0000AID588579
ATP-dependent phosphofructokinaseTrypanosoma brucei brucei TREU927Potency6.74560.060110.745337.9330AID485368
Chain A, CruzipainTrypanosoma cruziPotency25.78770.002014.677939.8107AID1476
ATAD5 protein, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency32.64270.004110.890331.5287AID504467
TDP1 proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency3.72660.000811.382244.6684AID686978; AID686979
Microtubule-associated protein tauHomo sapiens (human)Potency19.95260.180013.557439.8107AID1460
thioredoxin glutathione reductaseSchistosoma mansoniPotency56.23410.100022.9075100.0000AID485364
aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family, member A1Homo sapiens (human)Potency39.81070.011212.4002100.0000AID1030
cytochrome P450 family 3 subfamily A polypeptide 4Homo sapiens (human)Potency10.68400.01237.983543.2770AID1645841
estrogen nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.66820.000229.305416,493.5996AID743079
GVesicular stomatitis virusPotency2.68370.01238.964839.8107AID1645842
cytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)Potency10.68400.00108.379861.1304AID1645840
euchromatic histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2Homo sapiens (human)Potency89.12510.035520.977089.1251AID504332
vitamin D3 receptor isoform VDRAHomo sapiens (human)Potency89.12510.354828.065989.1251AID504847
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2 isoform dHomo sapiens (human)Potency35.48130.01789.637444.6684AID588834
DNA polymerase betaHomo sapiens (human)Potency19.95260.022421.010289.1251AID485314
nuclear receptor ROR-gamma isoform 1Mus musculus (house mouse)Potency35.48130.00798.23321,122.0200AID2546
gemininHomo sapiens (human)Potency29.09290.004611.374133.4983AID624296
peripheral myelin protein 22Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency0.18110.005612.367736.1254AID624032
lamin isoform A-delta10Homo sapiens (human)Potency11.59070.891312.067628.1838AID1487
neuropeptide S receptor isoform AHomo sapiens (human)Potency15.84890.015812.3113615.5000AID1461
Interferon betaHomo sapiens (human)Potency2.68370.00339.158239.8107AID1645842
HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)Potency2.68370.01238.964839.8107AID1645842
Cellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)Potency29.84930.002319.595674.0614AID651631
Inositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency2.68370.01238.964839.8107AID1645842
ATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)Potency5.30800.011917.942071.5630AID651632
Ataxin-2Homo sapiens (human)Potency5.30800.011912.222168.7989AID651632
cytochrome P450 2C9, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency2.68370.01238.964839.8107AID1645842
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Cannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.52300.00010.275310.0000AID1194240; AID1616820; AID1632496; AID1724928; AID1776934; AID1776935; AID1776936
Cannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)10.00000.00081.58409.8000AID1776939; AID677737
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Activation Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Cannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)2.01450.00010.12752.2400AID1234360; AID1234361; AID1234362; AID1234363; AID1273373; AID1273375; AID1273384; AID677730
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Other Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Cannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)Kb0.21720.00070.38172.2000AID1125170; AID1616821; AID773862
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (222)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
positive regulation of acute inflammatory response to antigenic stimulusCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-modulating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
spermatogenesisCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
axonal fasciculationCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
response to nutrientCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
memoryCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neuron projection developmentCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of serotonin secretionCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of fever generationCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of fatty acid beta-oxidationCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of synaptic transmission, GABAergicCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
response to lipopolysaccharideCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of mast cell activationCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of dopamine secretionCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
response to nicotineCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
cannabinoid signaling pathwayCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
response to cocaineCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
glucose homeostasisCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic processCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of action potentialCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of blood pressureCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of blood pressureCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of insulin secretionCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of synaptic transmission, glutamatergicCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
maternal process involved in female pregnancyCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of feeding behaviorCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of penile erectionCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
retrograde trans-synaptic signaling by endocannabinoidCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of presynaptic cytosolic calcium ion concentrationCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
trans-synaptic signaling by endocannabinoid, modulating synaptic transmissionCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of metabolic processCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
response to amphetamineCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
inflammatory responseCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
immune responseCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
leukocyte chemotaxisCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of synaptic transmission, GABAergicCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
response to lipopolysaccharideCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of mast cell activationCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
cannabinoid signaling pathwayCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of action potentialCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of metabolic processCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STATInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STATInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of autophagyInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine-mediated signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
natural killer cell activationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-serine phosphorylation of STAT proteinInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to interferon-betaInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell proliferationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of viral genome replicationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
innate immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of innate immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of MHC class I biosynthetic processInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of T cell differentiationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
defense response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
type I interferon-mediated signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
neuron cellular homeostasisInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of Lewy body formationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of T-helper 2 cell cytokine productionInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell differentiationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
natural killer cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
adaptive immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
T cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
humoral immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of T cell mediated cytotoxicityHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
adaptive immune responseHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
antigen processing and presentation of endogenous peptide antigen via MHC class I via ER pathway, TAP-independentHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of T cell anergyHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
defense responseHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
immune responseHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
detection of bacteriumHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of interleukin-12 productionHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of interleukin-6 productionHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
protection from natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicityHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
innate immune responseHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of dendritic cell differentiationHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
antigen processing and presentation of endogenous peptide antigen via MHC class IbHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycle G2/M phase transitionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ER overload responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucose starvationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
in utero embryonic developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
somitogenesisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
release of cytochrome c from mitochondriaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
hematopoietic progenitor cell differentiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell proliferation involved in immune responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
B cell lineage commitmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell lineage commitmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to ischemiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleotide-excision repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
double-strand break repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein import into nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
autophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in cell cycle arrestCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in transcription of p21 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
Ras protein signal transductionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
gastrulationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
neuroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of neuroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein localizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA replicationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
determination of adult lifespanCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
rRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to salt stressCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to inorganic substanceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to X-rayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to gamma radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle cell apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cardiac muscle cell apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
glial cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
viral processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
glucose catabolic process to lactate via pyruvateCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cerebellum developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell growthCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitotic G1 DNA damage checkpoint signalingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of telomere maintenance via telomeraseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell differentiation in thymusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
tumor necrosis factor-mediated signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of tissue remodelingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to UVCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
multicellular organism growthCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of mitochondrial membrane permeabilityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucose starvationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
entrainment of circadian clock by photoperiodCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial DNA repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neuron apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription initiation-coupled chromatin remodelingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of proteolysisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of RNA polymerase II transcription preinitiation complex assemblyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to antibioticCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
fibroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of fibroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
circadian behaviorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
bone marrow developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
embryonic organ developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein stabilizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of helicase activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein tetramerizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromosome organizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
neuron apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
hematopoietic stem cell differentiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of glial cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
type II interferon-mediated signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac septum morphogenesisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of programmed necrotic cell deathCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complex assemblyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to endoplasmic reticulum stressCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
thymocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of thymocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
necroptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to hypoxiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to xenobiotic stimulusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to ionizing radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to gamma radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to UV-CCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
stem cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to actinomycin DCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of release of cytochrome c from mitochondriaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
replicative senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
oxidative stress-induced premature senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
oligodendrocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of execution phase of apoptosisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of mitophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of mitochondrial membrane permeability involved in apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of G1 to G0 transitionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of miRNA processingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of glucose catabolic process to lactate via pyruvateCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of pentose-phosphate shuntCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to hypoxiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of fibroblast apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of stem cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cellular senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
inositol phosphate metabolic processInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylinositol phosphate biosynthetic processInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cold-induced thermogenesisInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol phosphate biosynthetic processInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell population proliferationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of B cell proliferationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear DNA replicationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
signal transduction in response to DNA damageATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
isotype switchingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA replicationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of isotype switching to IgG isotypesATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
DNA clamp unloadingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of mitotic cell cycle phase transitionATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell cycle G2/M phase transitionATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of receptor internalizationAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of translationAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA metabolic processAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
P-body assemblyAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
stress granule assemblyAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA transportAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (57)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
cannabinoid receptor activityCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor activityCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
cannabinoid receptor activityCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
cytokine activityInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine receptor bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
type I interferon receptor bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
chloramphenicol O-acetyltransferase activityInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
TAP bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
signaling receptor bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
peptide antigen bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
TAP bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
protein-folding chaperone bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
transcription cis-regulatory region bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
core promoter sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
TFIID-class transcription factor complex bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription repressor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protease bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
p53 bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromatin bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA 3'-UTR bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
copper ion bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
receptor tyrosine kinase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase regulator activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ATP-dependent DNA/DNA annealing activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein heterodimerization activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-folding chaperone bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein phosphatase 2A bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II-specific DNA-binding transcription factor bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
14-3-3 protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
MDM2/MDM4 family protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
disordered domain specific bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
general transcription initiation factor bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
molecular function activator activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
promoter-specific chromatin bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
inositol-1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol hexakisphosphate kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol heptakisphosphate kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol hexakisphosphate 5-kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol hexakisphosphate 1-kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol hexakisphosphate 3-kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol 5-diphosphate pentakisphosphate 5-kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol diphosphate tetrakisphosphate kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
DNA clamp unloader activityATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
RNA bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
epidermal growth factor receptor bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (51)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
mitochondrial outer membraneCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
actin cytoskeletonCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
growth coneCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
presynaptic membraneCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
membrane raftCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
glutamatergic synapseCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-ergic synapseCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCannabinoid receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
dendriteCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
extrinsic component of cytoplasmic side of plasma membraneCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
perikaryonCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCannabinoid receptor 2 Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
ER to Golgi transport vesicle membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
secretory granule membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
phagocytic vesicle membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
early endosome membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
recycling endosome membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
lumenal side of endoplasmic reticulum membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
MHC class I protein complexHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
external side of plasma membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear bodyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
replication forkCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial matrixCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
centrosomeCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear matrixCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
PML bodyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription repressor complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
site of double-strand breakCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
germ cell nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromatinCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription regulator complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
fibrillar centerInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
Elg1 RFC-like complexATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
trans-Golgi networkAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic stress granuleAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
membraneAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
ribonucleoprotein complexAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic stress granuleAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (135)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID504810Antagonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID1347049Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr1) antagonism - Pilot screen2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID1347086qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Arenaviruses (LCMV): LCMV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347082qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: LASV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347050Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr2) antagonism - Pilot subtype selectivity assay2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID504812Inverse Agonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID1508630Primary qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome: Secreted ER Calcium Modulated Protein (SERCaMP) assay2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID504836Inducers of the Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response (ERSR) in human glioma: Validation2002The Journal of biological chemistry, Apr-19, Volume: 277, Issue:16
Sustained ER Ca2+ depletion suppresses protein synthesis and induces activation-enhanced cell death in mast cells.
AID1347083qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: Viability assay - alamar blue signal for LASV Primary Screen2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347045Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr1) antagonism - Pilot counterscreen GloSensor control cell line2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID588378qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression: Validation
AID588349qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression: Validation of Cytotoxic Assay
AID1273376Negative allosteric modulator activity at human CB1R expressed in CHO-K1 cells assessed as effect on CP55,940-induced inhibition of forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation preincubated for 30 mins followed by CP55,940 addition measured for 30 mins by HitHunte2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-14, Volume: 59, Issue:1
Novel Electrophilic and Photoaffinity Covalent Probes for Mapping the Cannabinoid 1 Receptor Allosteric Site(s).
AID1273383Antagonist activity at CB1R in mouse brain membranes assessed as inhibition of CP55,940-induced [35S]GTPgammaS binding at 1 uM preincubated for 60 mins prior to [35S]GTPgammaS addition by liquid scintillation spectrometric analysis2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-14, Volume: 59, Issue:1
Novel Electrophilic and Photoaffinity Covalent Probes for Mapping the Cannabinoid 1 Receptor Allosteric Site(s).
AID1194243Agonist activity at human CB2 receptor expressed in CHO-RD-HGA16 cells at 10 uM after 15 mins by FLIPR assay relative to CP559402015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 23, Issue:9
Structure-activity relationships of substituted 1H-indole-2-carboxamides as CB1 receptor allosteric modulators.
AID1125170Displacement of [3H]CP55940 from cannabinoid CB1 receptor (unknown origin) expressed in HEK293 cells after 60 mins by liquid scintillation counting2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-10, Volume: 57, Issue:7
Optimization of chemical functionalities of indole-2-carboxamides to improve allosteric parameters for the cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1).
AID1234361Activity at hemagglutinin-tagged human CB1 receptor expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as effect on forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation after 5 mins in presence of CP55,940 by cAMP BRET assay2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 58, Issue:15
Distinct Temporal Fingerprint for Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate (cAMP) Signaling of Indole-2-carboxamides as Allosteric Modulators of the Cannabinoid Receptors.
AID1234364Inverse agonist activity at hemagglutinin-tagged human CB1 receptor expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as effect on forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation after 5 to 15 mins in presence of CP55,940 by cAMP BRET assay2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 58, Issue:15
Distinct Temporal Fingerprint for Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate (cAMP) Signaling of Indole-2-carboxamides as Allosteric Modulators of the Cannabinoid Receptors.
AID1776939Antagonist activity at human CB2 receptor expressed in CHO-RD-HGA16 cells overexpressing Galpha16 assessed as inhibition of CP55940-stimulated calcium mobilization preincubated for 15 mins followed by agonist addition and measured every 1 sec for 90 secs 2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 07-01, Volume: 41Rational design of cannabinoid type-1 receptor allosteric modulators: Org27569 and PSNCBAM-1 hybrids.
AID773862Positive allosteric modulation of CB1 receptor (unknown origin) expressed in HEK293 cell membranes assessed as stimulation of [3H]CP55,940 binding after 60 mins by liquid scintillation counting analysis2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-24, Volume: 56, Issue:20
Structure-activity relationship study of indole-2-carboxamides identifies a potent allosteric modulator for the cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1).
AID677730Allosteric modulation of human recombinant CB1 receptor expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as stimulation of [3H]CP55940 binding2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-14, Volume: 55, Issue:11
Indole-2-carboxamides as allosteric modulators of the cannabinoid CB₁ receptor.
AID1632505Ratio of drug level in CB1 mouse brain to blood at 30mg/kg, ip after 1 hr by HPLC/MS/MS method2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 09-15, Volume: 26, Issue:18
Development of indole sulfonamides as cannabinoid receptor negative allosteric modulators.
AID1776940Agonist activity at human CB2 receptor expressed in CHO-RD-HGA16 cells overexpressing Galpha16 assessed as stimulation of calcium mobilization measured every 1 sec for 90 secs by Calcium-3 dye based FLIPR assay relative to Emax of CP559402021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 07-01, Volume: 41Rational design of cannabinoid type-1 receptor allosteric modulators: Org27569 and PSNCBAM-1 hybrids.
AID1616820Allosteric antagonist activity at human CB1 receptor by Ca2+ assay2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-14, Volume: 62, Issue:21
Synthesis and Pharmacological Evaluation of 1-Phenyl-3-Thiophenylurea Derivatives as Cannabinoid Type-1 Receptor Allosteric Modulators.
AID1194240Antagonist activity at human CB1 receptor expressed in CHO-RD-HGA16 cells assessed as inhibition of CP55940-induced calcium mobilization incubated for 15 mins prior to CP55940 addition by FLIPR assay2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 23, Issue:9
Structure-activity relationships of substituted 1H-indole-2-carboxamides as CB1 receptor allosteric modulators.
AID1273382Inverse agonist activity at human CB1R expressed in CHO-K1 cells assessed as [35S]GTPgammaS binding at 10 uM preincubated for 60 mins prior to [35S]GTPgammaS addition by liquid scintillation spectrometric analysis2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-14, Volume: 59, Issue:1
Novel Electrophilic and Photoaffinity Covalent Probes for Mapping the Cannabinoid 1 Receptor Allosteric Site(s).
AID1632497Half life in human liver microsomes at 3 uM in presence of NADPH by LC-MS/MS analysis2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 09-15, Volume: 26, Issue:18
Development of indole sulfonamides as cannabinoid receptor negative allosteric modulators.
AID1632498Half life in rat liver microsomes at 3 uM in presence of NADPH by LC-MS/MS analysis2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 09-15, Volume: 26, Issue:18
Development of indole sulfonamides as cannabinoid receptor negative allosteric modulators.
AID1194242Agonist activity at human CB1 receptor expressed in CHO-RD-HGA16 cells at 10 uM after 15 mins by FLIPR assay relative to CP559402015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 23, Issue:9
Structure-activity relationships of substituted 1H-indole-2-carboxamides as CB1 receptor allosteric modulators.
AID1234368Inverse agonist activity at hemagglutinin-tagged human CB1 receptor expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as increase in forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation in absence of CP55,940 at 10 uM and 31.6 uM by cAMP BRET assay2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 58, Issue:15
Distinct Temporal Fingerprint for Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate (cAMP) Signaling of Indole-2-carboxamides as Allosteric Modulators of the Cannabinoid Receptors.
AID677732Allosteric modulation of human recombinant CB1 receptor expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as stimulation of [3H]CP55940 binding at 10 uM2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-14, Volume: 55, Issue:11
Indole-2-carboxamides as allosteric modulators of the cannabinoid CB₁ receptor.
AID1161647Antagonist activity at human CB1 receptor stably expressed in RD-HGA16 cells assessed as inhibition of CP55,940-induced calcium mobilization after 15 mins by FLIPR assay2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-25, Volume: 57, Issue:18
Diarylureas as allosteric modulators of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor: structure-activity relationship studies on 1-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-{3-[6-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)pyridin-2-yl]phenyl}urea (PSNCBAM-1).
AID1776937Agonist activity at human CB1 receptor expressed in CHO-RD-HGA16 cells overexpressing Galpha16 assessed as stimulation of calcium mobilization measured every 1 sec for 90 secs by Calcium-3 dye based FLIPR assay relative to Emax of CP559402021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 07-01, Volume: 41Rational design of cannabinoid type-1 receptor allosteric modulators: Org27569 and PSNCBAM-1 hybrids.
AID1776936Allosteric antagonist activity at N-terminal 3HA-tagged human CB1 receptor expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as reduction in CP55940-stimulated inhibition of forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation measured for 20 mins by BRET assay2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 07-01, Volume: 41Rational design of cannabinoid type-1 receptor allosteric modulators: Org27569 and PSNCBAM-1 hybrids.
AID677737Allosteric modulation of human recombinant CB2 receptor expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as inhibition of [3H]CP55940 binding2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-14, Volume: 55, Issue:11
Indole-2-carboxamides as allosteric modulators of the cannabinoid CB₁ receptor.
AID1273375Negative allosteric modulator activity at human CB1R expressed in CHO-K1 cells assessed as effect on CP55,940-induced inhibition of forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation preincubated for 30 mins followed by CP55,940 addition measured for 30 mins by HitHunte2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-14, Volume: 59, Issue:1
Novel Electrophilic and Photoaffinity Covalent Probes for Mapping the Cannabinoid 1 Receptor Allosteric Site(s).
AID1776938Antagonist activity at human CB2 receptor expressed in CHO-RD-HGA16 cells overexpressing Galpha16 assessed as inhibition of CP55940-stimulated calcium mobilization at 10 uM preincubated for 15 mins followed by agonist addition and measured every 1 sec for2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 07-01, Volume: 41Rational design of cannabinoid type-1 receptor allosteric modulators: Org27569 and PSNCBAM-1 hybrids.
AID1234354Allosteric agonist activity at hemagglutinin-tagged human CB1 receptor expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as effect on forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation at 10 uM by kinetic cAMP assay2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 58, Issue:15
Distinct Temporal Fingerprint for Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate (cAMP) Signaling of Indole-2-carboxamides as Allosteric Modulators of the Cannabinoid Receptors.
AID1273373Negative allosteric modulator activity at human CB1R expressed in CHO-K1 cells assessed as inhibition of CP55,940-induced beta-arrestin recruitment preincubated for 30 mins followed by CP55,940 addition measured for 90 mins by PathHunter assay2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-14, Volume: 59, Issue:1
Novel Electrophilic and Photoaffinity Covalent Probes for Mapping the Cannabinoid 1 Receptor Allosteric Site(s).
AID1273384Positive allosteric modulator activity at human CB1R expressed in CHO cells assessed as enhanced binding of [3H]CP55,940 after 60 mins by liquid scintillation spectrometric analysis2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-14, Volume: 59, Issue:1
Novel Electrophilic and Photoaffinity Covalent Probes for Mapping the Cannabinoid 1 Receptor Allosteric Site(s).
AID1234355Allosteric modulator activity at hemagglutinin-tagged human CB2 receptor expressed in Flp-In-293 cells assessed as effect on CP55,940-induced inhibition of forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation by kinetic cAMP assay2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 58, Issue:15
Distinct Temporal Fingerprint for Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate (cAMP) Signaling of Indole-2-carboxamides as Allosteric Modulators of the Cannabinoid Receptors.
AID1194241Antagonist activity at human CB2 receptor expressed in CHO-RD-HGA16 cells assessed as inhibition of CP55940-induced calcium mobilization at 10 uM incubated for 15 mins prior to CP55940 addition by FLIPR assay2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 23, Issue:9
Structure-activity relationships of substituted 1H-indole-2-carboxamides as CB1 receptor allosteric modulators.
AID1632496Negative allosteric modulation of human CB1 receptor expressed in CHO-K1 cells assessed as inhibition of CP55940 induced beta arrestin recruitment preincubated for 30 mins followed by addition of CP55940 for 90 mins by chemiluminescence assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 09-15, Volume: 26, Issue:18
Development of indole sulfonamides as cannabinoid receptor negative allosteric modulators.
AID1234353Allosteric modulator activity at hemagglutinin-tagged human CB1 receptor expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as effect on CP55,940-induced inhibition of forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation by kinetic cAMP assay2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 58, Issue:15
Distinct Temporal Fingerprint for Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate (cAMP) Signaling of Indole-2-carboxamides as Allosteric Modulators of the Cannabinoid Receptors.
AID677734Allosteric modulation of human recombinant CB2 receptor expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as inhibition of [3H]CP55940 binding at 10 uM2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-14, Volume: 55, Issue:11
Indole-2-carboxamides as allosteric modulators of the cannabinoid CB₁ receptor.
AID1616821Displacement of [3H]CP55,940 from human CB1 receptor2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-14, Volume: 62, Issue:21
Synthesis and Pharmacological Evaluation of 1-Phenyl-3-Thiophenylurea Derivatives as Cannabinoid Type-1 Receptor Allosteric Modulators.
AID1273386Negative allosteric modulator activity at CB1R in mouse brain membranes assessed as Emax for CP55,940-induced [35S]GTPgammaS binding at 1 uM preincubated for 60 mins prior to [35S]GTPgammaS addition by liquid scintillation spectrometric analysis relative 2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-14, Volume: 59, Issue:1
Novel Electrophilic and Photoaffinity Covalent Probes for Mapping the Cannabinoid 1 Receptor Allosteric Site(s).
AID1234367Activity at human CB1 receptor expressed in AtT20 cells assessed as increase in rate of repolarization at 0.1 to 10 uM in presence of 1 uM CP55,940 by membrane potential assay2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 58, Issue:15
Distinct Temporal Fingerprint for Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate (cAMP) Signaling of Indole-2-carboxamides as Allosteric Modulators of the Cannabinoid Receptors.
AID1776934Allosteric antagonist activity at human CB1 receptor expressed in CHO-RD-HGA16 cells overexpressing Galpha16 assessed as inhibition of CP55940-stimulated calcium mobilization preincubated for 15 mins followed by agonist addition and measured every 1 sec f2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 07-01, Volume: 41Rational design of cannabinoid type-1 receptor allosteric modulators: Org27569 and PSNCBAM-1 hybrids.
AID1776935Allosteric antagonist activity at human CB1 receptor expressed in HEK293 cell membrane assessed as inhibition of CP55940-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding incubated for 60 mins by [35S]GTP-gammaS binding assay2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 07-01, Volume: 41Rational design of cannabinoid type-1 receptor allosteric modulators: Org27569 and PSNCBAM-1 hybrids.
AID1273389Positive allosteric modulator activity at human CB1R expressed in CHO cells assessed as enhanced binding of [3H]CP55,940 after 60 mins by liquid scintillation spectrometric analysis relative to control2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-14, Volume: 59, Issue:1
Novel Electrophilic and Photoaffinity Covalent Probes for Mapping the Cannabinoid 1 Receptor Allosteric Site(s).
AID1724928Positive allosteric modulatory activity at C-terminal GFP-tagged human CB1R expressed in HEK293 cell membrane after 90 mins in presence of [3H]CP55940/[3H]SR141716A by liquid scintillation counting assay2020ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-08, Volume: 11, Issue:10
Impact of Allosteric Modulation in Drug Discovery: Innovation in Emerging Chemical Modalities.
AID1632499Apparent permeability of the compound at 10 uM after 5 hrs by PAMPA2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 09-15, Volume: 26, Issue:18
Development of indole sulfonamides as cannabinoid receptor negative allosteric modulators.
AID1273374Negative allosteric modulator activity at human CB1R expressed in CHO-K1 cells assessed as inhibition of CP55,940-induced beta-arrestin recruitment preincubated for 30 mins followed by CP55,940 addition measured for 90 mins by PathHunter assay relative to2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-14, Volume: 59, Issue:1
Novel Electrophilic and Photoaffinity Covalent Probes for Mapping the Cannabinoid 1 Receptor Allosteric Site(s).
AID1273392Positive allosteric modulator activity at human CB1R expressed in HEK293 cell membranes assessed as enhanced specific binding of [3H]CP55,940 at 500 nM pre-incubated for 60 mins before [3H]CP55,940 addition followed by drug wash-out by liquid scintillatio2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-14, Volume: 59, Issue:1
Novel Electrophilic and Photoaffinity Covalent Probes for Mapping the Cannabinoid 1 Receptor Allosteric Site(s).
AID1234363Activity at hemagglutinin-tagged human CB1 receptor expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as effect on forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation after 15 mins in presence of CP55,940 by cAMP BRET assay2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 58, Issue:15
Distinct Temporal Fingerprint for Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate (cAMP) Signaling of Indole-2-carboxamides as Allosteric Modulators of the Cannabinoid Receptors.
AID1234356Allosteric agonist activity at hemagglutinin-tagged human CB2 receptor expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as effect on forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation at 10 uM by kinetic cAMP assay2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 58, Issue:15
Distinct Temporal Fingerprint for Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate (cAMP) Signaling of Indole-2-carboxamides as Allosteric Modulators of the Cannabinoid Receptors.
AID1234360Activity at hemagglutinin-tagged human CB1 receptor expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as effect on forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation in presence of CP55,940 by cAMP BRET assay2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 58, Issue:15
Distinct Temporal Fingerprint for Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate (cAMP) Signaling of Indole-2-carboxamides as Allosteric Modulators of the Cannabinoid Receptors.
AID1234362Activity at hemagglutinin-tagged human CB1 receptor expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as effect on forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation after 10 mins in presence of CP55,940 by cAMP BRET assay2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 58, Issue:15
Distinct Temporal Fingerprint for Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate (cAMP) Signaling of Indole-2-carboxamides as Allosteric Modulators of the Cannabinoid Receptors.
AID1234365Activity at human CB1 receptor expressed in AtT20 cells assessed as effect on 1 uM CP55,940-induced peak hyperpolarization up to 10 uM by membrane potential assay2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 58, Issue:15
Distinct Temporal Fingerprint for Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate (cAMP) Signaling of Indole-2-carboxamides as Allosteric Modulators of the Cannabinoid Receptors.
AID1194244Allosteric modulation of human CB1 receptor expressed in CHO-RD-HGA16 cells assessed as reduction of CP55940 Emax by calcium mobilization assay2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 23, Issue:9
Structure-activity relationships of substituted 1H-indole-2-carboxamides as CB1 receptor allosteric modulators.
AID1346701Human CB1 receptor (Cannabinoid receptors)2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-14, Volume: 55, Issue:11
Indole-2-carboxamides as allosteric modulators of the cannabinoid CB₁ receptor.
AID504749qHTS profiling for inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum proliferation2011Science (New York, N.Y.), Aug-05, Volume: 333, Issue:6043
Chemical genomic profiling for antimalarial therapies, response signatures, and molecular targets.
AID504810Antagonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID504812Inverse Agonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID588218FDA HLAED, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID59464Antisecretory activity after iv administration in histamine-stimulated Heidenhain pouch dogs; Range is 0.3-1.01983Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 26, Issue:6
Synthesis and gastric antisecretory properties of 4,5-unsaturated derivatives of 15-deoxy-16-hydroxy-16-methylprostaglandin E1.
AID176557Diarrheal effect after ig administration in rats1983Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 26, Issue:6
Synthesis and gastric antisecretory properties of 4,5-unsaturated derivatives of 15-deoxy-16-hydroxy-16-methylprostaglandin E1.
AID1079945Animal toxicity known. [column 'TOXIC' in source]
AID588214FDA HLAED, liver enzyme composite activity2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID588220Literature-mined public compounds from Kruhlak et al phospholipidosis modelling dataset2008Toxicology mechanisms and methods, , Volume: 18, Issue:2-3
Development of a phospholipidosis database and predictive quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models.
AID588212Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID1079934Highest frequency of acute liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% AIGUE' in source]
AID1079941Liver damage due to vascular disease: peliosis hepatitis, hepatic veno-occlusive disease, Budd-Chiari syndrome. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'VASC' in source]
AID1079943Malignant tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.MAL' in source]
AID59327Antisecretory activity after ig administration in histamine-stimulated gastric fistula dogs; Range is 5.5-10.01983Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 26, Issue:6
Synthesis and gastric antisecretory properties of 4,5-unsaturated derivatives of 15-deoxy-16-hydroxy-16-methylprostaglandin E1.
AID178551Compound was tested for mucosal protective activity against indomethacin-induced intestinal damage in rats1993Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-15, Volume: 36, Issue:21
Catalytic functionalization of polymers: a novel approach to site specific delivery of misoprostol to the stomach.
AID625290Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver fatty2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID226187Activity ratio ED50 of diarrhea to ED50 of antisecretory in histamine -stimulated gastric fistula dogs1987Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 30, Issue:1
Synthesis and gastrointestinal pharmacology of a 3E,5Z diene analogue of misoprostol.
AID1079942Steatosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'STEAT' in source]
AID1079933Acute liver toxicity defined via clinical observations and clear clinical-chemistry results: serum ALT or AST activity > 6 N or serum alkaline phosphatases activity > 1.7 N. This category includes cytolytic, choleostatic and mixed liver toxicity. Value is
AID625288Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for jaundice2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID588217FDA HLAED, serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID588211Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in humans2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID1134747Gastric antisecretory activity in iv dosed Mongrel dog with heidenhain pouch assessed as inhibition of histamine-induced total acid output by titrimetric method1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 20, Issue:9
Synthesis and gastric antisecretory properties of 15-deoxy-16-hydroxyprostaglandin E analogues.
AID588216FDA HLAED, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID177465Effect determining the diarrheagenic activity in rats1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 29, Issue:7
Synthesis and gastric antisecretory properties of alpha chain diene derivatives of misoprostol.
AID178350Compound was tested for diarrheagenic activity in rats after intragastric administration (I.G)1993Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-15, Volume: 36, Issue:21
Catalytic functionalization of polymers: a novel approach to site specific delivery of misoprostol to the stomach.
AID588215FDA HLAED, alkaline phosphatase increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID235589Ratio of ED50 of diarrheal effect to antisecretory effect1983Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 26, Issue:6
Synthesis and gastric antisecretory properties of 4,5-unsaturated derivatives of 15-deoxy-16-hydroxy-16-methylprostaglandin E1.
AID625285Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic necrosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625289Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver disease2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID588219FDA HLAED, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID1079931Moderate liver toxicity, defined via clinical-chemistry results: ALT or AST serum activity 6 times the normal upper limit (N) or alkaline phosphatase serum activity of 1.7 N. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'BIOL' in source]
AID178552Compound was tested for mucosal protective activity in rats using 4 hr EtOH model1993Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-15, Volume: 36, Issue:21
Catalytic functionalization of polymers: a novel approach to site specific delivery of misoprostol to the stomach.
AID178351Compound was tested for diarrheagenic activity in rats after intrajejuna administration (I.J)1993Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-15, Volume: 36, Issue:21
Catalytic functionalization of polymers: a novel approach to site specific delivery of misoprostol to the stomach.
AID625291Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver function tests abnormal2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1079948Times to onset, minimal and maximal, observed in the indexed observations. [column 'DELAI' in source]
AID1079949Proposed mechanism(s) of liver damage. [column 'MEC' in source]
AID588213Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in non-rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID60020Oral gastric antisecretory effect in histamine-stimulated Heidenhain Pouch (HP) dogs1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 29, Issue:7
Synthesis and gastric antisecretory properties of alpha chain diene derivatives of misoprostol.
AID60032Relative gastric antisecretory effect in histamine-stimulated Heidenhain Pouch (HP) dogs1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 29, Issue:7
Synthesis and gastric antisecretory properties of alpha chain diene derivatives of misoprostol.
AID625283Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for elevated liver function tests2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625279Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for bilirubinemia2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625280Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholecystitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1079936Choleostatic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is < 2 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHOLE' in source]
AID1079932Highest frequency of moderate liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% BIOL' in source]
AID625281Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholelithiasis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625292Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) combined score2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID178550Compound was tested for mucosal protective activity against indomethacin-induced gastric damage in rats1993Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-15, Volume: 36, Issue:21
Catalytic functionalization of polymers: a novel approach to site specific delivery of misoprostol to the stomach.
AID625287Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatomegaly2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID226184Tested for relative antisecretory potency in histamine-stimulated gastric fistula dogs by intragastric administration; value ranges from (0.13-0.48)1987Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 30, Issue:1
Synthesis and gastrointestinal pharmacology of a 3E,5Z diene analogue of misoprostol.
AID226384Compound was evaluated for diarrheal activity in rats1987Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 30, Issue:1
Synthesis and gastrointestinal pharmacology of a 3E,5Z diene analogue of misoprostol.
AID1079938Chronic liver disease either proven histopathologically, or through a chonic elevation of serum amino-transferase activity after 6 months. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHRON' in source]
AID1079935Cytolytic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is > 5 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CYTOL' in source]
AID625282Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cirrhosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1134749Gastric antisecretory activity in Mongrel dog with heidenhain pouch assessed as inhibition of histamine-induced total acid output at 0.1 to 100 ug/kg, iv by titrimetric method relative to PGE11977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 20, Issue:9
Synthesis and gastric antisecretory properties of 15-deoxy-16-hydroxyprostaglandin E analogues.
AID1079947Comments (NB not yet translated). [column 'COMMENTAIRES' in source]
AID226182Tested for gastric antisecretory activity in histamine-stimulated gastric fistula dogs by intragastric administration1987Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 30, Issue:1
Synthesis and gastrointestinal pharmacology of a 3E,5Z diene analogue of misoprostol.
AID1079937Severe hepatitis, defined as possibly life-threatening liver failure or through clinical observations. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'MASS' in source]
AID232582Ratio of ED50 value of diarrheal effect to that of ED50 value of antisecretory effect1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 29, Issue:7
Synthesis and gastric antisecretory properties of alpha chain diene derivatives of misoprostol.
AID1079944Benign tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.BEN' in source]
AID625284Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic failure2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625286Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1079939Cirrhosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CIRRH' in source]
AID1079946Presence of at least one case with successful reintroduction. [column 'REINT' in source]
AID1079940Granulomatous liver disease, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'GRAN' in source]
AID60725Intravenous gastric antisecretory activity against histamine-stimulated Heidenhain Pouch (HP) dogs at 1 ug/kg1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 29, Issue:7
Synthesis and gastric antisecretory properties of alpha chain diene derivatives of misoprostol.
AID178349Compound was tested for diarrheagenic activity in rats after intracolonic administration (I.C)1993Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-15, Volume: 36, Issue:21
Catalytic functionalization of polymers: a novel approach to site specific delivery of misoprostol to the stomach.
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1346427Human EP4 receptor (Prostanoid receptors)2000Biochimica et biophysica acta, Jan-17, Volume: 1483, Issue:2
The utilization of recombinant prostanoid receptors to determine the affinities and selectivities of prostaglandins and related analogs.
AID1346343Human EP3 receptor (Prostanoid receptors)2000Biochimica et biophysica acta, Jan-17, Volume: 1483, Issue:2
The utilization of recombinant prostanoid receptors to determine the affinities and selectivities of prostaglandins and related analogs.
AID1346308Human EP2 receptor (Prostanoid receptors)2000Biochimica et biophysica acta, Jan-17, Volume: 1483, Issue:2
The utilization of recombinant prostanoid receptors to determine the affinities and selectivities of prostaglandins and related analogs.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (4,406)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-1990206 (4.68)18.7374
1990's911 (20.68)18.2507
2000's1452 (32.96)29.6817
2010's1341 (30.44)24.3611
2020's496 (11.26)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 139.87

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index139.87 (24.57)
Research Supply Index8.72 (2.92)
Research Growth Index5.11 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index266.52 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (139.87)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials0 (0.00%)5.53%
Trials1,522 (33.01%)5.53%
Reviews0 (0.00%)6.00%
Reviews625 (13.55%)6.00%
Case Studies0 (0.00%)4.05%
Case Studies235 (5.10%)4.05%
Observational0 (0.00%)0.25%
Observational49 (1.06%)0.25%
Other17 (100.00%)84.16%
Other2,180 (47.28%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (435)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Elective Induction of Nulliparous Labor: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT01076062]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-02-28Recruiting
Efficacy of Transcervical Vasopressin Injection VersusVaginal Misoprostol During Hysteroscopic Myomectomy in Reducing Operative Blood Loss and Operation Time: A Randomized Trial. [NCT03930069]Phase 2/Phase 340 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-02Completed
A Comparison of Oral Misoprostol and Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor [NCT02777190]Phase 434 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-01Terminated(stopped due to Insufficient research staff to recruit and complete study)
Second-line Treatment of Post-partum Haemorrhage With Intrarectal Misoprostol: a Multicentre, Double Blind, Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial [NCT01116050]Phase 3116 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
Phase Study Comparing Between Expectant Management and Misoprostol Treatment for Intra-uterine Residua After Pregnancy Termination, Abortion or Delivery [NCT01134926]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Terminated(stopped due to The principal investigator left the organization)
Oral Versus Vaginal Misoprostol as Cervical Ripening Agent Prior to Surgical Termination of First Trimester Missed Abortions in Hawler Maternity Teaching Hospital in Erbil/Iraq [NCT00797693]100 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
A Prospective Randomized Comparison Trial on the Use of Mifepristone With Sublingual or Buccal Misoprostol for Medical Abortions of Less Than 9 Weeks Gestation [NCT01156688]Phase 490 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind Phase III Study of the Efficacy and Safety of the Misoprostol Vaginal Insert Compared to Cervidil for Women Requiring Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor (The MVP Study). [NCT00308711]Phase 31,308 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
Buccal Versus Vaginal Misoprostol In Combination With Foley Bulb for Labor Induction at Term: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03976037]Early Phase 1216 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-06-04Completed
Effects of Co-administered Sublingual Misoprostol and Intravenous Tranexamic Acid on Prevention of Postpartum Hemorrhage in Pregnant Women With Twin Pregnancy Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT03774524]150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-01-01Recruiting
Use of Misoprostol in Hysteroscopic Myomectomy, a Randomized Peospective Trial [NCT06049745]Phase 4200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-30Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Clinical Trial of Early Amniotomy Versus Delayed Amniotomy Following Foley Catheter Ripening in Nulliparous Labor Induction [NCT03039036]69 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-12Completed
Misoprostol With Mechanical Dilation Versus Oxytocin With Mechanical Dilation for High-risk Pregnancy Inductions: A Randomized Control Trial [NCT04492072]150 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-08-17Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Assess The Efficacy and Safety of Misoprostol in The Prevention of Recurrence of Clostridium Difficile Infection in Adults [NCT03617172]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-26Terminated(stopped due to Low enrollment)
Letrozole and Misoprostol for Termination of Pregnancy up to 63 Days' Gestation: A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Safety and Acceptably of a User-friendly Regimen [NCT05207644]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-12-09Completed
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Co-administered Buccal Misoprostol and Intravenous Tranexamic Acid, Versus Buccal Misoprostol Alone for the Prevention of Postpartum Hemorrhage Following an Emergent Cesarean Delivery [NCT03777696]300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-01-01Recruiting
Randomized Comparison of Vaginal Dinoprostone and Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening Before Diagnostic Hysteroscopy in Patients Who Have Undergone Cesarean Section [NCT03675802]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-09-23Recruiting
Role of Vaginal Misoprostol Prior to IUCD Insertion in Women Who Delivered Only by Elective Caesarean Section. [NCT03939663]Phase 2210 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-07-01Recruiting
A Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Repetitive Hourly Dose of Oral Misoprostol and Two Hourly Dose Oral Regimens for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction [NCT03927807]Phase 2150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-03-18Recruiting
Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening Before Copper Intrauterine Device Removal in Women Delivered Only by Elective Cesarean Section [NCT03600064]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-07-01Completed
An Open Label Study of 400 mcg Sublingual Misoprostol Following Mifepristone 200 mg for Abortion up to 63 Days LMP [NCT01173003]688 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
The Effect of Pre-operative Versus Post-operative Misoprostol in Reducing Blood Loss During and After Elective Cesarean Section. [NCT05928871]Phase 4120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-01Recruiting
Vaginal Misoprostol With Intracervical Foley Catheter Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone in Induction of Labor at Term Pregnancy [NCT03682718]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-01Completed
Carbetocin Versus Buccal Misoprostol Plus IV Tranexamic Acid for Prevention of Postpartum Hemorrhage at Cesarean Section: A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial [NCT03710317]400 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-12-01Completed
Mifepristone and Misoprostol Versus Misoprostol Alone for Missed Abortion: A Randomized-controlled Trial [NCT02342002]Phase 4416 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-01-31Terminated(stopped due to lack of funding)
The Effect of Carbetocin Versus Oral Tranexamic Acid Plus, Buccal Misoprostol on Blood Loss After Vaginal Delivery: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03708497]360 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-12-01Completed
Safety, Effectiveness and Acceptability of Misoprostol When Administered by Midwives Versus Physicians for Management of Incomplete Mid Trimester Abortion in Uganda: a Randomized Controlled Equivalence Trial. [NCT03622073]1,191 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-14Completed
Vaginal Versus Sublingual Misoprostol Before Intrauterine Device Insertion in Women With Pervious Caesarian Section [NCT05204979]2 participants (Anticipated)Observational2021-06-23Recruiting
A Comparison Between Vaginal Misoprostol vs. Buccal Misoprostol For Second Trimester Termination of Pregnancy [NCT02048098]Phase 3130 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
Vaginal Misoprostol Before Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Insertion Following Previous Insertion Failure [NCT03790371]Phase 390 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-01Completed
CARBETOCIN VERSUS RECTAL MISOPROSTOL FOR MANAGEMENT OF THIRD STAGE OF LABOR IN WOMEN AT LOW RISK OF POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE [NCT03556852]Phase 4150 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-07-02Completed
The Use of Oxytocin, Carbetocin and Buccal Misoprostol in Patients Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section [NCT02053922]Phase 3270 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Completed
A Randomized Double-blinded Comparison of 24-hour Interval-Mifepristone and Buccal Misoprostol Versus Mifepristone and Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Preparation in Second-Trimester Surgical Abortion [NCT03134183]Phase 470 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-19Completed
Carbetocin in Preventing Postpartum Bleeding in Women With Severe Preeclampsia. [NCT02086994]Phase 360 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
A One Year Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Sublingual Misoprostol (400 µg) Versus Intramuscular Oxytocin (10 IU) in the Prevention of Postpartum Bloodloss at KLE Hospital, Belgaum [NCT01373359]Phase 3652 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
Efficacy of Vaginal Misoprostol For Pain Relief During Office Hysteroscopy and Endometrial Biopsy; A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03547778]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Unable to get patients interested in the study)
The Effect of Oxytocin Versus, Sublingual Misoprostol in the Secondary Prevention of Postpartum Hemorrhage After Vaginal Delivery: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05077540]150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-01Not yet recruiting
An Outpatient Medical Abortion Regimen With Mifepristone and Two Doses of Misoprostol at 71-77 and 78-84 Days of Pregnancy [NCT05119439]Phase 423 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-10-07Terminated(stopped due to Enrollment)
"Single Versus Double Dose Intra-vaginal Prostaglandin E2 Misoprostol Prior Abdominal Myomectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study" [NCT02154932]Phase 469 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
Comparison of Vaginal Versus Oral Misoprostol for Nulliparous Women Prior to Operative Hysteroscopy [NCT01156948]Phase 3120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-05-31Recruiting
The Effect of Oral Tranexamic Acid Plus, Sublingual Misoprostol in the Management of Atonic Postpartum Hemorrhage (PPH) After Vaginal Delivery: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03870256]135 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-01Completed
Oral Misoprostol Solution in Comparison to Vaginal Misoprostol in Induction of Labor [NCT03863392]100 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-15Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Control Trial of Combined Vaginal Misoprostol and Perivascular Vasopressin During Robotic Myomectomy [NCT03815344]Phase 436 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-04-26Recruiting
Assessment of Fever After Misoprostol Administration for the Treatment of Primary Postpartum Hemorrhage [NCT01080846]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
Role of Sublingual Misoprostol With or Without Intravenous Tranexamic Acid for Reducing Post-partum Hemorrhage During and After Hemorrhagic Cesarean Section: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT03774706]150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-01-01Recruiting
Labor Induction With a Combined Method (Pharmacologic and Mechanical): Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03928600]140 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-01Completed
Low-dose Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Dinoprostone Insert for Induction of Labor Beyond 41st Week: a Randomized Trial [NCT03744364]Phase 4198 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-01Completed
Adjuvant Isonicotinic Acid Hydrazide (INH) Pretreatment With Misoprostol for Induction of Abortion in First-trimester Missed Miscarriage: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04500002]240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-01Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Single and Repeated Dose of Vaginal Misoprostol for the Treatment of Early Pregnancy Failure - a Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT02515604]Phase 4180 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-31Completed
Comparison of Two Protocols of Misoprostol (PGE1) and Their Effect on the Rate of Cesarean Section Due to Failed Induction. A Randomized, Controlled Trial. [NCT03489798]310 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-05Completed
Immune Modulation by Misoprostol [NCT02259309]Early Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
Letrozole Pretreatment With Misoprostol for Induction of Abortion In First-Trimester Missed Miscarriage: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03628625]Phase 280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-09-10Recruiting
A Prospective Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial on the Use of Letrozole Pretreatment With Misoprostol for Second-Trimester Medical Abortion [NCT02405156]Phase 2/Phase 3400 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-31Completed
Assessing the Effectiveness of Two Regimens of Misoprostol Alone for Early Pregnancy Termination and Use of a Semi-Quantitative Pregnancy Test for At-Home Follow-Up [NCT02299401]Phase 2/Phase 3401 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
Acceptability and Feasibility of a Simplified Medical Abortion Regimen in Georgia: A Study of 400 mcg Buccal Misoprostol Following 200 mg Mifepristone for Abortion up to 63 Days Gestation [NCT02398838]622 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
Misoprostol Prior To Cupper Intra Uternine Device Insertion In Nullipara: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT03490617]Phase 3179 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
The Effect of Preoperative and Post Operative Misoprostol Administration on Intraoperative Blood Loss and Postpartum Hemorrhage in CS [NCT03680339]Phase 4200 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-02Completed
Intrauterine Misoprostol Versus Intravenous Oxytocin Infusion During Cesarean Delivery to Reduce Intraoperative and Postoperative Blood Loss: A Randomized Clinical Trial. [NCT03148574]Phase 3240 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-02Completed
The Use of Laminaria Versus Laminaria Plus Misoprostol Before Operative Hysteroscopy in Nulliparous Women . A Double Blinded Randomized Trial. [NCT03388827]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-12-20Recruiting
Compare the Different Routes of Administration of Misoprostol During Medicinal Abortion Between 7 and 9 Weeks of Amenorrhoea (SA) [NCT03140384]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-20Withdrawn(stopped due to no regulatory approval)
Intravaginal Isosorbide Mononitrate in Addition to Misoprostol Versus Misoprostol Only for Induction of Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03523754]Phase 1/Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-01-01Active, not recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Pre-operative Vaginal Misoprostol in Reduction of Intraoperative Blood Loss During Myomectomy. Amulticentre Single Blind Randomized Trial. [NCT03509168]Phase 2/Phase 346 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-01-10Recruiting
Outpatient Medical Abortion With Mifepristone and Misoprostol Through 77 Days of Gestation: A Non-inferiority Trial [NCT02314754]Phase 4719 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
The Comparison of Efficacy for Cervical Ripening in Labor Induction Between Titrated and Conventional Oral Misoprostol [NCT00886860]Phase 464 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
Oral Misoprostol for Labor Augmentation: A Dose-Finding Pilot Study [NCT00906126]Phase 146 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
Use of Ulipristal Acetate in Induction of Second Trimester Missed Abortion in Women With Previous Caesarian Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial. [NCT04989400]Phase 424 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-01Completed
Two Community Strategies Comparing Use of Misoprostol for Secondary Prevention to Primary Prevention for Postpartum Hemorrhage: A Randomized Cluster Non-Inferiority Study in El Beheira Governorate, Egypt [NCT02226588]Phase 42,827 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Completed
Buccal Misoprostol Versus IV Oxytocin in Prevention of Postpartum Hemorrhage :a Randomized Controlled Study [NCT03676621]Phase 4154 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-01Completed
A Cluster Randomized Trial of Labor Induction With Oral Versus Vaginal Misoprostol [NCT04755218]2,546 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-05-24Completed
Phase 1 Study of Misoprostol in Reducing Intraoperative Bleeding in Myomectomy Operations [NCT02061657]Phase 350 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
Misoprostol for the Management of Bloating and Gaseous Distension in Patients With Cirrhosis: an Open Label Trial [NCT04768010]Early Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-08-31Withdrawn(stopped due to After significant delays study was never initiated. No participants enrolled)
PROMMO Trial: Prelabor Rupture of Membranes Managed With Oral Misoprostol Versus Intravenous Oxytocin [NCT04478942]Early Phase 1100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-10-26Recruiting
Dry vs Wet Misoprostol for Cervical Dilation in First Trimester Abortion - A Clinical Trial [NCT02522078]Phase 446 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-31Completed
The Effect of Misoprostol Given Preoperative Versus Postoperative on Blood Loss With Elective Cesarean Section: Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03463070]Phase 3140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-03-31Not yet recruiting
Optimisation of the Management of Placental Delivery in Second Trimester Pregnancy Interruption [NCT00120042]251 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-02-28Completed
Comparison of Vaginal Versus Sublingual Misoprostol in the Treatment of First Trimester Missed Miscarriage [NCT04604366]Phase 2120 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-02Completed
Evaluation the Blood Loss in Pregnancies With Misoprostol-induced Labour [NCT01231126]Phase 4161 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
Evaluation of the Effect of Rectal Misoprostol on Blood Loss During Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. [NCT02265562]Phase 3220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-10-31Recruiting
Misoprostol for Induction of Labor in Obese Women: Comparison Between 25 and 50 mcg Oral Administration - a Randomized Trial [NCT05857059]228 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-15Recruiting
Mifepristone and Misoprostol Versus Misoprostol Alone for Treatment of Fetal Death at 14-28 Weeks of Pregnancy: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Double-blinded Trial [NCT02633761]Phase 3200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-04-01Terminated(stopped due to Lack of funding)
Combined Use of Oxytocin and Misoprostol in the Prevention of Post Partum Haemorrhage [NCT01113229]Phase 41,721 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Terminated(stopped due to reason of halt prematurely: futility of the trial)
Early Versus Delayed Artificial Rupture of Membranes Following Foley Catheter Ripening in Labor Induction: A Randomized Controlled Trial (AROM Trial) [NCT04496908]Early Phase 1160 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-16Completed
Medical Abortion With Multiple vs Single Daily Dose of Misoprostol in First Trimester Miscarriage: A Randomized Clinical Trial. [NCT03487354]Phase 2/Phase 3200 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-01Completed
the Effect of Misoprostol on Intra-operative Blood Loss During Myomectomy Operation [NCT03483142]Phase 350 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-11-01Recruiting
Efficacy of Intravaginal Administration of Isosorbide Mononitrate Together With Misoprostol Versus Misoprostol Alone in Induction of Labor in Postdate Women [NCT03854383]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-03-03Recruiting
Labor Induction With Double Balloon Device, Oral Misoprostol and Concomitant Use of Both. Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial- IDOM Trial [NCT03866772]250 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-06-01Terminated(stopped due to RECRUTIMENT DIFICULTIES)
TRANSCERVICAL FOLEY CATHETER (FOLEY) Versus INTRAVAGINAL MISOPROSTOL FOR CERVICAL RIPENING AND INDUCTION OF LABOR: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL. [NCT01140971]180 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
The Effect of IV Tranexamic Acid Plus Buccal Misoprostol on Blood Loss During and After Cesarean Delivery: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03710304]400 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-01Completed
Comparing Effectiveness of Oral Misoprostal for Cervical Priming in Premenopausal Women Underwent to Diagnostic Hysteroscopy: Double-blind, Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial [NCT03638856]17 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-30Completed
Randomized Controlled Comparison of Blood Loss in Patients Who Received Oxytocin Infusion, Oxytocin Infusion, and Intrauterine Misoprostol and Carbetocin During Cesarean Delivery [NCT05083910]156 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-07-01Completed
Preoperative Vaginal Dinoprostone Versus Misoprostone to Decrease Bleeding During Abdominal Myomectomy [NCT05761418]Phase 390 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-01Completed
Cervical Ripening in Obese Women: a Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Efficacy of 25 mcg Versus 50 mcg of Misoprostol [NCT03748147]300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-12-10Not yet recruiting
Carbetocin Versus Oxytocin Plus Sublingual Misoprostol in the Management of Atonic Post-partum Hemorrhage (PPH) After Vaginal Delivery: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03870503]135 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-01Completed
Sublingual Misoprostol 12,5 mcg Versus Vaginal Misoprostol 25 mcg for Induction of Labour of Alive and Term Fetus : Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01406392]Phase 4150 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-01Completed
A Pilot Study of the Preoperative Misoprostol in Reducing Operative Blood Loss During Hysterectomy [NCT01199159]77 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
The Efficacy and Safety of Intrauterine Misoprostol Versus Rectal Misoprostol in Reducing Blood Loss During and After Cesarean Section [NCT03723031]Phase 298 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-11-15Recruiting
Medical Management of Late Intrauterine Death Using a Therapeutic Combination of Isosorbide Dinitrate and Oxytocin. [NCT02488642]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
Medical Termination of Pregnancy From Day 85 to Day 153 of Gestation: A Randomized Comparison Between Administration of the Initial Dose of Misoprostol at Home or in the Clinic [NCT03600857]Phase 4457 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-12-10Completed
Evaluation of Efficacy of Two Therapeutic Strategies for Cervical Maturation Before Medical Termination: Mechanical Plus Medicinal Maturation vs Medicinal Maturation Alone [NCT03194126]120 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-11Completed
Use of Misoprostol by Families and Women as a First Aid Measure to Address Excessive Postpartum Bleeding in Home Deliveries [NCT02853552]Phase 44,330 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-10-31Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Control Trial of Misoprostol Versus Placebo for Cervical Priming in IUD Insertion for Nulliparous Women [NCT01307111]85 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
The Efficacy and Safety of Intrauterine Misoprostol Versus Intravenous Tranexamic Acid in Reducing Blood Loss During and After Cesarean Delivery in Patients With Placenta Previa: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05340205]Phase 481 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-05-04Completed
Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol and Dinoprostone Prior to Copper Intrauterine Device Insertion in Women Delivered Only by Cesarean Delivery:a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04080349]Phase 4300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-09-10Not yet recruiting
A Comparison of Titrated Oral Misoprostol Solution to Intravenous Oxytocin for Labor Augmentation: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT00695331]Phase 4143 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-02-29Recruiting
Vaginal Dinoprostone Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Prior to Diagnostic Office Hysteroscopy in Postmenopausal Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04044079]Phase 4150 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-20Completed
Cervical Preparation Before Same-day Second Trimester Abortion With Buccal Misoprostol Versus Dilapan-S: A Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial [NCT00835731]125 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Effectiveness of Tranexamic Acid When Used as an Adjunct to Misoprostol for the Treatment of Postpartum Hemorrhage [NCT02805426]Phase 4260 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-31Completed
Comparison of 3 Regimens Using Mifepristone and Misoprostol for Second Trimester Pregnancy Interruption. [NCT00864799]302 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
SUB LINGUAL MISOPROSTOL PRIOR TO IUD INSERTION IN WOMEN WITH ONLY PREVIOUS CESARIAN SECTION: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02141321]Phase 2/Phase 3124 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
Misoprostol With And Without Transcervical Balloon Catheter In Second Trimester Termination Of Pregnancy: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03106389]Phase 4108 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-03-01Recruiting
Effect of Adding Vaginal Isosorbide Mononitrate to Misoprostol Prior to Intrauterine Device Insertion in Women Delivered Only by Elective Cesarean Section: a Randomized Double-blind Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT03587077]113 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-09-30Not yet recruiting
A Randomised Trial for Postoperative Pain After Rectal Misoprostol or Rectal Hyoscine Administration [NCT03359655]120 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-11Completed
Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol and Dinoprostone and Isonicotinic Acid Hydrazide Prior to Copper Intrauterine Device Insertion in Nulliparous Women : a Randomized Controlled Study [NCT04505943]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-01Not yet recruiting
A Comparative, Open-label, Parallel Design, Bioavailability Study of Two Misoprostol Formulations (Angusta™ 25 µg Dispersible Tablets vs. Cytotec® 200 µg Tablets) Following Single Oral or Sublingual Administration and Comparison of Safety of the Two Formu [NCT02516631]Phase 172 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
"Evaluating the Safety, Acceptability and Feasibility of an Outpatient Day Procedure Service Documenting the Roles of Health Workers in the Provision of Medical Abortion at 13-18 Weeks Gestation" [NCT03346629]Phase 4230 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-01Completed
Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Combined Intracervical Foley's Catheter and Oxytocin Infusion for Second Trimester Pregnancy Termination in Women With Previous Caesarean Sections [NCT04501809]158 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-15Recruiting
Sublingual Misoprostol 400 mcg and 800 mcg In Medical Treatment of First Trimester Missed Miscarriage: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05103098]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-01Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Oral Misoprostol, Low Dose Vaginal Misoprostol and Vaginal Dinoprostone for Induction of Labour [NCT03489928]Phase 3511 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-04-01Completed
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Sequential Use of Mifepristone and Misoprostol vs Misoprostol Alone in Women With Early Pregnancy Loss: Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05124314]Phase 4220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-27Recruiting
Vaginal Estradiol Pretreatment in Labour Induction With Misoprostol [NCT02485821]Phase 2/Phase 3200 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-30Completed
Titrated Oral Misoprostol Compared to Vaginal Dinoprostone for Induction of Labor: a Randomized Control Trial [NCT02036437]Phase 3200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-09-30Recruiting
Same-day Cervical Preparation With Misoprostol Before Hysteroscopy: a Randomized Trial of Different Routes of Administration [NCT02474433]Phase 4120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-07-31Recruiting
Use of Oral Misoprostol for Cervical Priming Before Hysteroscopy: a Randomized Comparison of Two Dosages [NCT02159911]84 participants (Actual)Observational2004-06-30Completed
Comparative Study on Effects of Sublingual Misoprostol in Addition to Standard Active Management of Third Stage of Labour in Low Risk Parturients in Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, Ikeja. [NCT02424201]Early Phase 1660 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-06-30Not yet recruiting
The Effect of Pre-operative Intravenous Tranexamic Acid Versus Rectal Misoprostol in Reducing Blood Loss During and After Elective Cesarean Section in Primigravida: A Double-blinded, Randomized, Controlled Trial [NCT04635007]Phase 3200 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-01Completed
Vaginal Misoprostol Prior to Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Insertion in Women With Previous Caesarean Section [NCT02412033]Phase 1140 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
Use of Letrozole Pretreatment With Misoprostol for First-Trimester Medical Abortion: Randomised Controlled Trial [NCT02401425]Phase 2/Phase 3423 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-31Completed
[NCT02168881]342 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-05-31Recruiting
MISOPROSTOL FOR THE TREATMENT OF SUSPECTED POSTPARTUM RETAINED PRODUCTS OF CONCEPTION - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL [NCT06009679]150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-02Recruiting
Misoprostol for the Healing of Small Bowel Ulceration in Patients With Obscure Blood Loss While Taking Low-dose Aspirin or Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs [MASTERS Trial] [NCT02202967]Phase 3104 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-07Completed
Buccal Misoprostol Prior to Abdominal Myomectomy for Reduction of Intraoperative Blood Loss: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial [NCT02209545]Phase 447 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Terminated(stopped due to The study was prematurely closed due to low enrollment rates.)
Misoprostol Plus Isosorbide Mononitrate Versus Misoprostol For Termination Of Anembryonic Pregnancy [NCT02573051]Phase 2108 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-06-30Recruiting
Cervical Priming With Misoprostol Prior to Operative Hysteroscopy [NCT01024270]Phase 3141 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
A Prospective, Comparative Study of Clinical Outcomes Following Clinic-based Versus Self-use of Medication Abortion Using a Misoprostol-only Regimen [NCT04242212]4,000 participants (Anticipated)Observational2019-05-19Recruiting
Mifepristone (RU 486) and Misoprostol for Second Trimester Termination of Pregnancy. A Comparison of Two Different Dose Regimens. [NCT00945997]176 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-10-31Completed
Single Dose Versus Two Doses of Sublingual Misoprostol in Decreasing Blood Loss Prior to Abdominal Myomectomy: A Randomized Double-blinded Clinical Trial [NCT02709564]Phase 380 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-31Completed
Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing the Effect of Vaginal Misoprostol Synchronously With Supracervical Balloon Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Induction of Labor [NCT02762942]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-05-31Recruiting
Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening Prior to Endometrial Biopsy [NCT00953641]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Principle Investigator retired, Resident moved away)
Comparison of Maternal Outcome Between Patients Undergoing Induction of Labor With Oral Misoprostol Alone and Oral Misoprostol and Foley's Catheter Both at a Tertiary Care Hospital [NCT02758340]Phase 3335 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-30Completed
Comparison Between Vaginal and Sublingual Misoprostol 50 µg for Cervical Ripening Prior to Induction of Labor: Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT02732522]Phase 4102 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Completed
Rectal Misoprostol Versus Sublingual Misoprostol in Decreasing Blood Loss Prior to Abdominal Myomectomy: A Randomized Double-blinded Clinical Trial [NCT02716142]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-01Completed
Misoprostol for the Treatment of Incomplete Abortion: Comparison of Treatment Options [NCT00670761]720 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Oral Misoprostol for Labor Augmentation [NCT00906347]Phase 4350 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Bilateral Uterine Artery Ligation in Decreasing Blood Loss in Trans-abdominal Myomectomy , a Randomized Control Trail [NCT02643186]Phase 462 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-07-31Recruiting
Mifepristone Versus Osmotic Dilators in Conjunction With Misoprostol for Cervical Preparation Prior to D&E at 14-19 Weeks [NCT02679092]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Funding changes.)
Comparing Two Regimens for Medical Abortion: Mifepristone+Misoprostol Versus Misoprostol Alone [NCT00680394]440 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
Misoprostol for Treatment of Incomplete Abortion [NCT00674232]311 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
Misoprostol Versus Effox (Individually or in Combination) as Cervical Ripening Agent Prior to 1st Trimesteric Surgical Evacuation [NCT02738177]Phase 290 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-11-30Recruiting
Sublingual Misoprostol and Routine Third Stage Prophylaxis for the Prevention of Postpartum Haemorrhage: A Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial. [NCT04044287]Phase 31,496 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-01-01Recruiting
Expectant Management Versus Medical Management of Retained Products of Conception After Induced Abortion [NCT04685694]Phase 4141 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-01Completed
Prostaglandins Versus Trans-Cervical Balloon for Induction of Labor in Fetal Growth Restriction: a Multicenter Open-label Randomized Trial [NCT05674487]774 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-03-01Not yet recruiting
Buccal Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening Prior to Surgical Termination of the First Trimester Missed Abortion in Erbil [NCT00892229]Phase 2100 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
Vaginally Administered Versus Per Oral Misoprostol in Induction of Labour: a Randomized Trial [NCT02539199]Phase 4270 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
Induction With Misoprostol: Oral Mucosa Versus Vaginal Epithelium [NCT02408315]Phase 3300 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
Treatment of Postpartum Hemorrhage With Misoprostol: Who do we Treat? Who Will Develop Fever? [NCT02163616]Phase 3635 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
6-Month, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Controlled, Multi-center Study of Gastric Ulcer Incidence With PN400 (Esomeprazole/Naproxen) Versus Diclofenac/Misoprostol in Subjects at High Risk for Developing NSAID-Associated Ulcers [NCT00594854]Phase 320 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Terminated(stopped due to POZEN agreed with FDA to stop study due to low and inadequate enrollment)
Rectal Misoprostol in Women Undergoing Total Abdominal Hysterectomy for Intraoperative Blood Loss Reduction [NCT05862428]56 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-02-18Completed
Comparison Between 200 μg and 800 μg of Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening Prior to Operative Hysteroscopy: Randomized and Quadruple Blind Clinical Trial. [NCT04152317]Phase 380 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-07Completed
Comparison of Oral Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Labour Induction at Term [NCT05957666]Phase 2/Phase 3176 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-16Recruiting
Prophylactic Analgesic and Antiemetic Regimen for Medical Abortion < 70 Days [NCT05819619]Early Phase 1168 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-20Recruiting
Carbetocin Versus Oxytocin Plus Misoprostol in Decreasing Intraoperative Blood Loss in Women Undergoing Planned Cesarean Section [NCT05664659]Phase 490 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-12-20Completed
Misoprostol Dosing in BMI Greater Than 30: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05262738]Phase 4180 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-06-01Completed
Mifepristone and Misoprostol Versus Misoprostol Alone for Mid-trimester Termination of Pregnancy (14 - 21 Weeks LMP): A Randomized-controlled Double-blinded Trial [NCT00784186]120 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
A Randomized Prospective Double Blind Study of Misoprostol Administration in Asymptomatic Patients With Pregnancies of Unknown Location [NCT02581761]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-11-30Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol and Dinoprostone Prior to Copper Intrauterine Device Insertion in Nulliparous Women:a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04080336]Phase 4129 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-10Completed
Comparative Study Between Vaginal Dinoprostone and Vaginal Misoprostol Prior to IUD Insertion in Multiparous Women [NCT04301349]Phase 3200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-03-15Not yet recruiting
[NCT02685085]Phase 2300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-02-29Recruiting
Which is the Optimal Treatment for Miscarriage With a Gestational ac in the Uterus and Which Factors Can Predict if the Treatment Will be Successful? [NCT01033903]190 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-01Completed
[NCT02574338]135 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
Comparison Between Adjunctive Sublingual Misoprostol Versus Adjunctive Placebo in the Reduction of Intraoperative Blood Loss During Caesarean Section [NCT05532215]152 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-14Recruiting
Pilot Study of an Ambulatory Medical Abortion Service at 13-18 Weeks of Gestation in Colombia [NCT04063904]Phase 416 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-16Terminated(stopped due to Difficulties with recruitment, COVID 19 pandemic)
Effect of Prophylactic Misoprostol Prior to Intrauterine Device Insertion [NCT00613366]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
A Randomized Control Trial of Misoprostol vs. Placebo Prior to IUD Insertion in Nulliparous Women [NCT00886834]108 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
Adjuvant Use of Misoprostol and Oxytocin vs. Carbetocin for the Prevention of Post-partum Hemorrhage in Elective Cesarian Section [NCT02786992]Phase 2/Phase 3600 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Completed
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Sublingual and Buccal Misoprostol Regimens After Mifepristone for Termination of Pregnancy 13 - 21 Weeks From Last Menstrual Period (LMP) [NCT02708446]Phase 4320 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-05-31Recruiting
Umbilical Vein Injection of 800µg Misoprostol Versus 400 µg Misoprostol in the Treatment of Retained Placenta: A Multicenter, Randomized Double Blind Controlled Trial [NCT02704780]Phase 2509 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
Comparative Study of Sublingual Misoprostol Versus Oxytocin in Reducing Bleeding at Cesarean Section [NCT02562300]Phase 2120 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
Sublingual Versus Vaginal Misoprostol In Medical Treatment of First Trimestric Missed Miscarriage: A Randomized Controlled Trial. [NCT02686840]Phase 3200 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-31Completed
Mifepristone and Misoprostol Versus Misoprostol Alone for Mid-trimester Termination of Pregnancy (14-21 Weeks LMP): A Randomized-controlled Double-blinded Trial [NCT00957346]Phase 320 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-02-28Terminated
A Randomized,Double-blind,Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor [NCT01428037]Phase 3225 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
Effects of Preoperative Sublingual Misoprostol on Uterine Tone During Isoflurane Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section [NCT01466530]Phase 2366 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
BMI-Associated Labor Induction: A Prospective Trial [NCT04035382]82 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-31Recruiting
Mifepristone and Misoprostol Versus Misoprostol Alone for Mid-trimester Termination of Pregnancy (14 - 21 Weeks LMP): A Randomized-controlled Double-blinded Trial [NCT00969982]238 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Abortive Measures From the Administration of Mifegyne and Cytotec at One and Two Visits [NCT00920465]Phase 3200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-06-30Recruiting
The Extended Gestational Age Medical Abortion Study: The Effectiveness of Medical Abortion With Mifepristone and Misoprostol at 57-63 Days Versus 64-70 Days Gestation [NCT00997347]Phase 41,400 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
A Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase II Study of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of the100 Mcg Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI 100) in Women Requiring Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor [NCT00528255]Phase 20 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn(stopped due to PK portion will be included in a future protocol)
Misoprostol for Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis- a Randomized Control Trial [NCT05804305]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-07-01Completed
Letrozole Pretreatment With Misoprostol for Induction of Abortion In First-Trimester Missed Miscarriage: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04217265]Phase 4200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-05Not yet recruiting
The Effectiveness, Safety, and Acceptability of Home-administered Medical Abortion at Gestational Age of 8 to ≤9 Weeks Versus >9 to ≤12 Weeks: A Prospective Cohort Study in Mexico City [NCT02745093]Phase 4648 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-09-30Not yet recruiting
Misoprostol for Treatment of Fetal Death at 14-28 Weeks of Pregnancy, Inclusive, Not Accompanied by Complete Expulsion of the Contents of the Uterus [NCT00671060]Phase 3153 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Oral Misoprostol Titrated Solution Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labour: Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT00992524]400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-11-30Completed
A Pilot Study of the Acceptability and Feasibility of an Out-patient Regimen of Medical Abortion With Mifepristone and 400 mcg Sublingual Misoprostol at 71-77 and 78-84 Days Gestation [NCT02720991]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Completed
[NCT00386867]1,200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
Carbetocin Versus Misoprostol for Prevention of Postpartum Hemorrhage in Pregnant Women at High Risk Following C.S. [NCT02277067]Phase 4200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-10-31Recruiting
Vaginal Misodel® in Comparison With Orally Administrated Misoprostol (Cytotec®) at Induction of Labour [NCT02918110]Phase 4320 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-09-30Recruiting
A Randomized Control Trial of Misoprostol vs. Placebo for Cervical Preparation in IUD Insertion for Nulliparous Women [NCT01001897]61 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
Assessing Acceptability and Use of Medical Menstrual Regulation in the United States [NCT03972358]Phase 2284 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-02-12Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Titrated Oral Misoprostol Solution for Labor Induction at Term [NCT01070472]250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
Treatment of Early Pregnancy Failure [NCT00468299]16 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Terminated(stopped due to poor enrollment)
A Phase IV Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Preventive Effectiveness of NSAID-Associated Gastroduodenal Injury (Multi-center, Double-blind, Active-controlled, Stratified Randomized, Parallel Group) [NCT01912066]Phase 4520 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
[NCT01931410]Phase 4618 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
Sublingual Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Dilatation 1 or 3 Hours Prior to Surgical Abortion [NCT01933360]Phase 2184 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
Introduction of 400mcg Sublingual Misoprostol as First Line Treatment in 11 Health Posts in Three Districts in Senegal [NCT01939457]641 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
Prostaglandins Use Before Mirena IUD Insertion in Prev CS Women During Lactational Amenorrhea [NCT04646161]400 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2020-11-25Recruiting
Assessing the Acceptability of Using Misoprostol Alone for Menstrual Regulation [NCT04940013]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-25Recruiting
Comparing Preoperative Vaginal Misoprostol, Intraoperative Oxytocin Infusion, Intravenous Carbetocin and Pericervical Hemostatic Tourniquet in Reducing Blood Loss During Abdominal Myomectomy, a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04595812]Phase 4120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-01Not yet recruiting
A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Trial of Misoprostol for Healing of Small Bowel Ulcers in Aspirin Users With Small Bowel Bleeding (MISO-SB Study) [NCT01998776]Phase 2/Phase 382 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
Sublingual Misoprostol Versus Standard Surgical Care for the Treatment of Incomplete Abortion [NCT00466999]1,000 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
Foley OR MisO for the Management of Induction (FOR MOMI) Trial [NCT01916681]491 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
Comparison Between Sublingual Misoprostol vs. Sublingual Misoprostol and Laminaria For Second Trimester Termination of Pregnancy [NCT02013960]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-01-31Enrolling by invitation
A Randomized Control Trial of Misoprostol Versus Placebo for Cervical Priming in Intrauterine Device Insertion for Nulliparous Women [NCT01147497]78 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
Acceptability and Feasibility of a Simplified Medical Abortion Regimen in Kazakhstan: A Study of 600 µg Sublingual Misoprostol Following 200 mg Mifepristone for Abortion up to 70 Days Gestation [NCT02018796]290 participants (Actual)Observational2013-10-31Completed
Carbetocin Versus Misoprostol in Reducing Blood Loss During Cesarean Section in Low Risk Patients. A Retrospective Comparative Study [NCT04313218]300 participants (Actual)Observational2018-01-01Completed
Pain and Functional Outcomes With Misoprostol Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis [NCT04611464]23 participants (Actual)Observational2019-07-11Completed
Study at Zagazig General Hospital [NCT04593108]320 participants (Anticipated)Observational2019-01-15Active, not recruiting
Does Self-Administered Vaginal Misoprostol Result in Cervical Ripening in Postmenopausal Women After 14 Days Pre-Treatment With Estradiol? [NCT00572819]Phase 3100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Sublingual Versus Intrauterine MISOPROSTOL in Addition to Oxytocin Infusion for Prevention of Post-cesarean Hemorrhage in High Risk Pregnant Women: A Double-blind Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial [NCT04560218]Phase 3135 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-30Completed
Medical Termination of Pregnancy Due to Emergency Contraception Failure: A Randomized Trial Comparing Mifepristone Combined Misoprostol and Misoprostol Alone. [NCT00677755]394 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-31Completed
Misoprostol Effect on Second Trimester Abortion Blood Loss [NCT06078501]Phase 340 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-15Not yet recruiting
Letrozole Plus Misoprostol Versus Misoprostol Alone in Induction of Abortion of Anembryonic Pregnancy: [NCT05198050]96 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-04-03Completed
In Vitro Myometrial Contractions in Laboring and Non-laboring Women: Oxytocin is Superior to Other Uterotonic Agents [NCT01689311]53 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
A Pilot Study of Mifepristone Followed by Misoprostol in Women Undergoing Second Trimester Abortion [NCT00592215]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Withdrawn
Non-surgical Alternatives to Treatment of Failed Medical Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Double-blind Trial [NCT02704481]Phase 416 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-01Terminated(stopped due to Funding mechanism compromised)
Oxytocin Versus Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor in Pregnant Women With Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes [NCT05215873]Phase 4200 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-02-01Completed
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Sublingual Misoprostol in Addition to Routine Uterotonics to Reduce Primary Postpartum Haemorrhage in Low Risk Women After Vaginal Delivery [NCT05079061]Phase 41,300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-30Not yet recruiting
Letrozole Pretreatment With Misoprostol for Induction of Abortion In First-Trimester Missed Miscarriage Among Women With One or More Previous Cesarean Deliveries.: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04215835]Phase 4200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-05Not yet recruiting
The Efficacy and Safety of Preoperative Intravenous Tranexamic Acid Versus Sublingual Misoprostol in Reducing Blood Loss During and After Elective Cesarean Section Among High Risk Pregnant Cases. [NCT04117243]Phase 2345 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-20Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Different Doses of Vaginal Misoprostol Prior to Intra Uterine Contraceptive Device Insertion [NCT04273984]Phase 4180 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-03-01Completed
A Randomized Trial to Determine the Best Strategy for the Control of Blood Loss at Elective Caesarean Section [NCT01412073]Phase 3600 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
Mifepristone and Misoprostol for the Treatment of Early Pregnancy Failure: a Pilot Clinical Trial [NCT00177372]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
RCT of Misoprostol for Postpartum Hemorrhage in India [NCT00097123]1,600 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2002-09-30Completed
A Randomized Study of Sublingual and Buccal Misoprostol Administration Following Mifepristone 200 mg for Abortion up to 63 Days Gestation [NCT00870272]550 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
Effect of Maternal Obesity on Labour Induction in Postdate Pregnancy [NCT02788305]288 participants (Actual)Observational2016-05-01Completed
Sublingual Misoprostol for the Treatment of Incomplete Abortion: Operations Research [NCT02707653]75 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
Effect of Maternal Age and BMI on Induction of Labor Using Oral Misoprostol in Late-term Pregnancies: a Retrospective Cross-sectional Study [NCT06184139]104 participants (Anticipated)Observational2023-12-31Not yet recruiting
Oral Misoprostol Before Endometrial Biopsy [NCT00200226]Phase 372 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-02-28Completed
[NCT00206193]0 participants ObservationalRecruiting
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-dummy, Double Blind, Misoprostol-comparative Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Mucosta® Tablet in the Prevention of NSAID-induced Gastrointestinal Complications [NCT00576706]Phase 3396 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-12-31Completed
The Acceptability of an Out-patient Regimen of Medical Abortion With Mifepristone and 800 Mcg Misoprostol Administered Buccally or Sublingually at 78-84 Days Gestation: Two Pilot Studies [NCT01856985]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Misoprostol Versus Oxytocin for Prevention of Post Partum Hemorrhage [NCT01863706]Phase 1400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
Combating Maternal Mortality in Uganda: An Assessment of the Role of Misoprostol in Prevention of Post-Partum Hemorrhage [NCT01866241]Phase 31,140 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
The Obstetric Cook Double Balloon Catheter in Combination With Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01866488]Phase 2200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-04-30Recruiting
[NCT00529295]Phase 3220 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
Two Community Strategies Comparing Use of Misoprostol for Secondary Prevention to Primary Prevention for Postpartum Hemorrhage: A Randomized Cluster Non-Inferiority Study in Bijapur District, Karnataka, India [NCT01462422]3,032 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Hourly Titrated Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Dinoprostone and Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction: Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT02902653]Phase 4372 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-09-30Recruiting
Misoprostol Before Elective Caesarean Section for Decreasing the Neonatal Respiratory Morbidity: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03031353]170 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-31Recruiting
Dilapan vs Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening [COMRED - Comparison of Misoprostol Ripening Efficacy With Dilapan] [NCT03670836]Phase 4308 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-15Completed
[NCT01510574]749 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
Misoprostol for the Medical Management of Non-Viable First Trimester Pregnancies [NCT00426491]Phase 330 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-03-31Completed
A Randomised Comparison Between Intravaginal Dinoprostone Intravaginal Misoprostol and Transcervical Balloon Catheter for Labour Induction [NCT00602095]Phase 3592 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-12-31Completed
A Pilot Study of Priming Before Induction Termination of Pregnancy [NCT00495560]25 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Sequential Versus Concurrent Use of Vaginal Misoprostol Plus Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor [NCT02952807]Phase 2160 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-31Completed
Mifepristone and Misoprostol for Undesired Pregnancy of Unknown Location: A Randomized Pilot Study of Misoprostol Dosing [NCT05839899]Phase 350 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-30Recruiting
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EFFECTS BETWEEN LETROZOLE PLUS MISOPROSTOL AND MIFEPRISTONE PLUS MISOPROSTOL IN TERMINATING NON-VIABLE FIRST TRIMESTER PREGNANCIES [NCT05304273]Phase 3120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-05Recruiting
Carbetocin Versus Misoprostol for Prevention of Postpartum Hemorrhage in Cases With Placenta Previa After C.S. [NCT02277041]Phase 4200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-10-31Recruiting
Orally Administered Misoprostol Solution (Cytotec®) Versus Orally Administered Misoprostol as a Tablet (Angusta®) for Induction of Labor in Women With Mixed Parity and an Unfavorable Cervix, a Randomized Controlled Trial. [NCT05424445]Phase 3884 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-01-21Completed
[NCT02908295]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-01Completed
A Comparative Study Between Preoperative and Postoperative Rectal Misoprostol in the Reduction of Blood Loss During and After Elective Cesarean Section : A Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT06049160]128 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-31Recruiting
Rectal Misoprostol as a Hemostatic Agent During Abdominal Myomectomy [NCT03064568]Phase 450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-10-14Recruiting
Comparison of Intravaginal Misoprostol and Dinoprostol for the Purpose of Cervical Ripening Before Diagnostic Hysteroscopy in the Women at the Reproductive Age:RANDOMİSED,CONTROLLED PROSPECTİVE TRİAL [NCT01620814]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-07-31Recruiting
Comparison Between 2 Different Doses of Vaginal Misoprostol Before Intrauterine Device Insertion in Parous Women [NCT02901561]Phase 2/Phase 3212 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Completed
Enhancing All Community Health Workers on Maternal and Newborn Health: Rorya Tanzania [NCT03024905]17,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-16Completed
Different Methods of Termination of Second Trimester Abortion: Comparative Clinical Study [NCT03400683]150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-01-31Not yet recruiting
A Pilot Study on the Combined Use of Letrozole, Miferpristone and Misoprostol in Termination of First Trimester Pregnancy up to 63 Days Gestation [NCT01475318]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-10-31Recruiting
Phase 2-3 Study of Comparative of Effects of Sublingual Misoprostol and Infusion Oxytocin in Reduction of Blood Loss at Cesarean Deliveries [NCT01477840]Phase 2/Phase 3180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-08-31Not yet recruiting
Treatment of Postpartum Haemorrhage (PPH) Using Misoprostol in Home Births [NCT01485562]84 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
Preventing Postpartum Hemorrhage: Examining Two Strategies for PPH Prevention in Communities: Misoprostol and Oxytocin in UnijectTM in Mali [NCT01487278]0 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn
A Randomized Controlled Community Study of the Effectiveness of Misoprostol for PPH Treatment at the Community Level (Home Births Attended by Primary Care Unit Staff) in Etay El Barood and Kafr El Dawar Districts (El Beheira Governorate), Egypt [NCT01619072]82 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
Evacuatio Uteri or Conservtive Treatment After Late Abortion. A Randomize Trial. [NCT00256009]Phase 4200 participants InterventionalNot yet recruiting
Oral Misoprostol as a Second-line Alternative to Intravenous Oxytocin in Preventing Postoperative Blood Loss After Non-scheduled Cesarean Section: a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial [NCT00107874]Phase 256 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-01-31Completed
Comparative Study Between Oral and Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labor in Nulliparous Pregnant Women at or Beyond Completed 41 Weeks [NCT05696574]80 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-20Not yet recruiting
A Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trial of Misoprostol in the Management of the Third Stage of Labor in the Home Delivery Setting in Rural Pakistan [NCT00120237]1,600 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
A Randomized Study of Cervical Priming With Misoprostol Prior to Elective First Trimester Pregnancy Termination: Effects on Pain, Ease of Procedure and Complications [NCT00310921]Phase 2200 participants Interventional2001-05-31Completed
Controlled-Release Misoprostol Vaginal Insert in Parous Women for Labor Induction: Randomized Trial [NCT00346840]Phase 2124 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
Mifepristone Versus Misoprostol for Cervical Preparation Prior to Surgical Abortion Between 11 to 15 Weeks [NCT01636063]42 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Poor subject enrollment)
Cervical Ripening in Premature Rupture of Membranes [NCT02314728]230 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-01Completed
Misoprostol in the Treatment of Post Partum Hemorrhage: A Placebo Randomised Controlled Trial in 4 Karachi Hospitals [NCT00116480]61 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
[NCT00482209]1,220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
Comparison of Intrauterine Misoprostol Plus Intravenous Oxytocin Versus Intravenous Oxytocin Alone for Prevention of Primary Postpartum Haemorrhage in Population of Bhara Kahu. [NCT04724187]Phase 2180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-03Recruiting
[NCT00140114]Phase 3170 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
Early Versus Late Amniotomy on Labour Induction in Nulliparous Women [NCT04514770]140 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-03Completed
Dilapan Versus Prostaglandin E1 in Induction of Midtrimester Abortion [NCT05147857]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-01Recruiting
A Single Dose of Oral Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT00148473]Phase 2/Phase 3180 participants Interventional2000-03-31Completed
A Phase II, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of the Misoprostol Vaginal Priming Insert for Women Requiring Cervical Priming Prior to a Hysteroscopy [NCT00925938]Phase 251 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
The Comparison of the Effectiveness of Rectal Misoprostol and Intravenous Tranexamic Acid in Reducing Intraoperative Bleeding in Patients Undergoing Myomectomy [NCT06114758]75 participants (Actual)Observational [Patient Registry]2023-09-01Active, not recruiting
Induction of Labour at Term With Low Dose Oral Misoprostol Versus a Foley Catheter: a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial [NCT06056141]Phase 4782 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-01Active, not recruiting
Safety of Tranexamic Acid Versus Misoprostol in Reducing Blood Loss in Myomectomy. [NCT04694677]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-10Not yet recruiting
Sublingual Misoprostol Versus Standard Surgical Care for the Treatment of Incomplete Abortion [NCT01539408]Phase 190 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
Comparison of Twq Different Regimen of Vaginal Misoprostol for Nid Trimester MTP [NCT00401440]Phase 4185 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Misoprostol for the Treatment of Primary Postpartum Hemorrhage [NCT00116350]1,786 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
The Efficacy of Transcervical Foley Balloon Plus Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone For Cervical Ripening In Nulliparous Obese Women: A Randomized, Comparative Effectiveness Trial [NCT02639429]Phase 4236 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-31Completed
Multicenter Study to Investigate the Bleeding Profile and the Insertion Easiness in Women Inserted With a Second Consecutive MIRENA for Contraception or Menorrhagia [NCT00393198]Phase 4204 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
A Randomized Trial of Two Regimens of Misoprostol for Second Trimester Intrauterine Fetal Death [NCT00141895]Phase 373 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Difficulty recruiting)
A Randomized, Control Trial for Preinduction Cervical Ripening [NCT00393731]Phase 2540 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
Comparing Methotrexate Followed by Misoprostol to Misoprostol Alone for Early Abortion [NCT00129506]Phase 4300 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
Simultaneous Mifepristone and Misoprostol Versus Misoprostol Alone for Induction of Labor of Nonviable Second Trimester Pregnancy: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05322252]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-01Recruiting
Misoprostol for Preventing Postpartum Hemorrhage [NCT00124540]1,200 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
Comparison Expectant With Immediate Medical Management for the Evacuation of the no Evolutionary Pregnancies Before 13 GW [NCT00190294]Phase 4200 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-30Completed
The Role of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Immediate Versus Delayed Induction in Term-PROM - a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02985086]568 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-07-31Recruiting
Phase 1 Study of Titrated Oral Misoprostol [NCT01271257]Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
Comparing Buccal and Vaginal Misoprostol in Management of Early Pregnancy Loss: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02141555]Phase 2/Phase 34 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Completed
Cervical Foley Plus Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction: A Randomized Trial [NCT01279343]123 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
An Alongside Qualitative Study Exploring Patients' and Health Care Professionals' Expectations and Experiences of Labour Induction With Misoprostol and Oxytocin for Hypertension in Pregnancy in India [NCT04037683]136 participants (Actual)Observational2019-10-18Completed
Dilapan-S With Adjunctive Misoprostol for Same-day Second Trimester Dilation and Evacuation: A Randomized Trial [NCT01818414]29 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Concerns for safety)
Effect of Adjunctive Misoprostol on Blood Loss at Vaginal Delivery [NCT02411916]143 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-30Completed
Prevention of Recurrent Ulcer Bleeding in Patients With Idiopathic Gastroduodenal Ulcer: a Double-blind Randomised Trial on Misoprostol Combined With Lansoprazole Versus Lansoprazole Alone (NRT_MISO Study) [NCT03675672]Phase 4154 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-06-21Recruiting
Misoprotol as a Treatment for Endometrial Polyps in Infertile Patients [NCT04270994]Phase 2/Phase 354 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized Comparison of Mifepristone and Misoprostol Administered Simultaneously Versus 24 Hours Apart for Abortion Through 63 Days [NCT00269568]Phase 41,128 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-30Completed
Balloon to Induce Labor in Generous Women [NCT03435458]Phase 3429 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-06-26Terminated(stopped due to interim analyses)
Misoprostol Dose and Timing Before Surgical Abortion at 13 to 16 Weeks' Gestation: a Randomized Trial [NCT02279914]118 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
The Randomised-Controlled Trial Of Misoprostol And Dinoprostone Vaginal Pessaries for Cervical Priming (TROMAD Study) [NCT00299754]Phase 3171 participants Interventional2003-01-31Completed
A Randomized Study of Sublingual Versus Oral Misoprostol Administration Following Mifepristone 200 mg for Abortion up to 63 Days Gestation [NCT00286208]1,443 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
Randomized Trial Comparing Misoprostol and Foley Bulb for Pregnancy Termination in the Second Trimester [NCT00324519]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-02-28Completed
Randomized Trial Comparing Misoprostol and Foley Bulb for Labor Induction in the Preterm Gestation [NCT00325026]Phase 2130 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
Oral Mifepristone and Buccal Misoprostol Administered Simultaneously for Abortion Through 63 Days Gestation [NCT00330993]Phase 2120 participants Interventional2006-03-31Completed
The Role of Cervical Consistency Index and Uterocervical Angles in Predicting Second Trimester Medical Termination [NCT06164067]136 participants (Actual)Observational [Patient Registry]2022-02-15Completed
Foley Catheter Plus Vaginal Isosorbide Mononitrate Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labour:a Randomised Controlled Trial [NCT01506388]Phase 3400 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
A Comparative Study of Vaginal Misoprostol Two Dosing Regimen for First Trimester Pregnancy Termination in Patients Admitted at Bandarabbas in Shariati Hospital in 2009 [NCT01508143]41 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
Misoprostol for the Treatment of Postpartum Haemorrhage (PPH) Following Self- Administration of Misoprostol Prophylaxis in Home Deliveries. [NCT01508429]70 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
Intrauterine Misoprostol With Active Management of Labour Versus Active Management of Labour for Prevebtion of Postpartum Hemorage in Cesarean Section ,Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03390010]Phase 1300 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-28Completed
Obesity Study to Assess Induction of Labor With Balloon and Cytotec: a Randomized Control Trial [NCT03796416]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-12-01Withdrawn(stopped due to in error)
A Trial Comparing The Use Of Rectal Plus Perivascular Vasopressin With Perivascular Vasopressin Alone To Decrease Bleeding At The Time Of Myomectomy [NCT01700478]Phase 445 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-02-28Completed
Preventing Postpartum Hemorrhage: Examining Two Strategies for PPH Prevention in Communities: Misoprostol and Oxytocin in Uniject® [NCT01710566]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Withdrawn
Preventing Postpartum Hemorrhage: Examining Two Strategies for PPH Prevention in Communities: Misoprostol and Oxytocin Uniject in Senegal [NCT01713153]1,365 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Completed
Comparison of Sublingual Misoprostol Versus Lidocaine Spray for Pain Relief in Office Hysteroscopy: A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial [NCT01718314]138 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
Misoprostol Treatment of Incomplete Abortion by Midwives and Physicians. A Randomized Control Trial in Uganda [NCT01743508]731 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
Assessment of Use of Misoprostol to Facilitate the Insertion of Intrauterine Contraceptives After Failure of Insertion. A Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial [NCT01754649]Phase 4102 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
Cervical Ripening Before Endometrial Biopsy in Abnormal Uterine Bleeding (AUB) Using Sublingual Misoprostol 200 Mcg: A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-controlled Trial [NCT01762319]52 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-11-30Recruiting
Misoprostol Versus Uterine Striating by Bladder Filling for Pain Relief During Office Hysteroscopy. A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02328495]Phase 276 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
Comparison Between 25 µg Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Slow Release Pessary Prostaglandin-E2 (PGE2) : Could we Use Low Dose Vaginal Misoprostol as a First Line Treatment for Induction of Labor ? [NCT01765881]Phase 21,700 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
Medical Abortion With Mifepristone + Misoprostol (13 - 22 Weeks): A Double-blind Randomized-controlled Trial [NCT01768299]Phase 4504 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Completed
Induction of Labour in Pre-eclamptic Women: a Randomised Trial Comparing the Foley Balloon Catheter With Oral Misoprostol [NCT01801410]Phase 3602 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
A Randomized Comparison of Oral, Sublingual and Vaginal Misoprostol Administration in Premenopausal Women Before Operative Hysteroscopy [NCT01805115]Phase 3120 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
Randomized Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol and Intravenous Oxytocin for Labor Induction in Multiparous Women [NCT01634854]130 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
Intra-umbilical Injection of Misoprostol Versus Normal Saline in the Management of Retained Placenta: Intrapartum Placebo-controlled Trial [NCT01840813]Phase 146 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
Task Sharing to Improve Post Abortion Care at District Health Care Level- Trial in Uganda [NCT01844024]Phase 41,010 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
Acceptability and Feasibility of a Simplified Medical Abortion Service Delivery in Western Ukraine: A Demonstration Study of 800 mcg Buccal Misoprostol Following 200 mg Mifepristone for Abortion up to 70 Days Gestation [NCT02981030]Phase 4102 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-23Completed
Foley Bulb With Oral Misoprostol Versus Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor: A Cluster Randomized Trial [NCT03407625]2,227 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-01Completed
Effect of Rectal Misoprostol in Reducing Intra-operative Blood Loss During Myomectomy A Randomized Control Trial [NCT05108597]Phase 3200 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-03-04Completed
Comparing the Effectiveness of Misoprostol, Oxytocin, Carbetocin, Vasopressin, Bupivacaine and Epinephrine, Combined IV TXA Acid and Ethamsylate and Peri Cervical Tourniquet for the Reduction of Blood Loss During of Abdominal Myomectomy. [NCT05806307]Phase 4105 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-15Recruiting
Comparative Effectiveness of Pregnancy Failure Management Regimens [NCT02012491]Phase 3300 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
Effect of a Labor Induction Protocol on Vaginal Delivery Rate [NCT04004845]66 participants (Actual)Observational2021-03-30Terminated(stopped due to Study was temporarily paused due to COVID19 and ultimately terminated at the discretion of the PI)
POM PROM: Pitocin or Oral Misoprostol for PROM IOL in Nulliparous Women With Unfavorable Cervical Exams [NCT04028765]Phase 4108 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-12Completed
Optimal Timing of Misoprostol Administration Prior to Office Hysteroscopy; a Randomized Controlled Trial. [NCT02316301]Phase 2120 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
TheEffect of pH on Misoprostol in Induction of Labor in Full Term Pregnancies [NCT03829592]180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-02-06Recruiting
Efficacy of Misoprostol in Prevention of Neonatal Respiratory Morbidity in Parturient at Early Term Elective Caesarian Section [NCT04780412]Phase 3210 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-01Active, not recruiting
Labor Induction With Misoprostol Versus Oxytocin in Women With Premature Rupture of Membranes [NCT04143685]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-12-01Recruiting
Randomized Controlled Study: Comparison of Laminaria and Misoprostol for Cervical Preparation Before Second Trimester Surgical Abortion [NCT01678703]84 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Effect of Misoprostol in Reducing Post Partum Hemorrhage After Labor Induction by Oxytocin: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02983591]300 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-30Completed
Mifepristone and Misoprostol Compared With Misoprostol Alone for Second Trimester Abortion [NCT03044093]Phase 4200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-31Recruiting
Value of Mifepristone in Eliminating the Need for a Second Set of Osmotic Dilators Prior to Dilation and Evacuation Between 19-24 Weeks: A Randomized Trial [NCT01615731]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
Carbetocin Versus Combined Oxytocin and Misoprostol for Prevention of Postpartum Hemorrhage in Women With Severe Preeclampsia [NCT04756661]124 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-01Completed
Comparative Safety and Efficacy of Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Lidocaine-prilocaine Cream in Reducing Pain During Levonorgestrel IUD Insertion in Women Delivered Only by Cesarean Deliveries [NCT04339348]Phase 3210 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-04-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Sublingual Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labor for Primigravida at 41 or More Weeks of Pregnancy: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT04887493]500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-01Not yet recruiting
Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid Versus Vaginal Misoprostol in Reducing Intraoperative Blood Loss During Abdominal Myomectomy [NCT04358965]Phase 4162 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-05-10Not yet recruiting
Misoprostol Prior to Intrauterine Device Insertion in Non-menstruating Women [NCT04932382]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-10-01Completed
[NCT01571323]Phase 1/Phase 2150 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
Cervical Priming Before Dilation & Evacuation: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01597726]159 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
Ulipristal Acetate for Use in Early Pregnancy Loss: A Phase 2 Pilot Feasibility Study [NCT05216952]Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-05-11Completed
The Optimum Dose of Vaginal Misoprostol Prior to Office Hysteroscopy: Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01612065]Phase 3132 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Completed
Repeated Doses of Misoprostol for Treatment of Missed Abortion [NCT01615224]Phase 2/Phase 323 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Terminated(stopped due to No funding)
Cervical Preparation of Abortions Under Paracervical Block in the First Trimester: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT03043014]110 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-01Completed
Is More Than One Dose of Misoprostol Needed to Expedite Vaginal Delivery in a Patient With an Unripe Cervix? [NCT02680314]Phase 2243 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-29Completed
Different Analgesics Prior to IUD Insertion: Is There Any Evidence? [NCT02522130]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-07-31Recruiting
[NCT00432588]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants InterventionalNot yet recruiting
IUD Insertion in Nulliparous Women: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Misoprostol for Cervical Priming [NCT01422226]3 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Unable to recruit participants)
Effect of Preoperative Buccal Misoprostol on Blood Loss in Second-trimester [NCT01436266]Phase 33 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Slow enrollment)
Prospective Non Interventional Phase IV Multi-centre Canadian Study on the Effectiveness and Safety of Combination Mifepristone/Misoprostol for Medical Abortion Under 63 Days Gestation [NCT04905251]3,000 participants (Anticipated)Observational2022-02-22Recruiting
Acceptability and Feasibility of Medical Abortion in Mexico, Puerto Rico, Armenia and Azerbaijan: A Study of Buccal Misoprostol Administration Following Mifepristone 200 mg for Abortion up to 63 Days' Gestation [NCT00386282]1,250 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
Self-Administered Vaginal Misoprostol at Home for Cervical Ripening Prior to Outpatient Hysteroscopy: a Randomised Placebo-Controlled Trial. [NCT00363389]Phase 386 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
Randomized Clinical Trial of Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction Using Stepwise Oral Misoprostol With or Without Intravaginal Isosorbide Mononitrate [NCT00374621]156 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
Propranolol and Misoprostol Versus Misoprostol Alone for Induction of Labor In Primigravidas [NCT04533841]Phase 2128 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-01Completed
The HYsteroscopic Miscarriage MaNagement (HYMMN) Trial [NCT04751500]149 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-31Completed
Comparison of Misoprostol and PGE2 Gel for Induction of Labour in in Premature Rupture of Membranes at Term- A Randomized Comparative Trial [NCT00355303]Phase 4932 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
Comparison Between 400 µg or 200 µg of Misoprostol for Cervical Dilatation in 1st Trimester Miscarriage - A Clinical Trial [NCT02957305]Phase 4211 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-21Completed
Outpatient Transcervical Balloon: Does it Shorten the Hospital Stay for Induction of Labor? Randomized Control Trial [NCT05798728]300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-09Recruiting
A Factorial-Design Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Misoprostol Alone to Dilapan With Misoprostol and Comparing Buccal to Vaginal Misoprostol for Same-Day Cervical Preparation Prior to Dilation & Evacuation [NCT02363556]160 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
Buccal Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Third Trimester Induction of Labor: Randomized Control Trial [NCT01519765]Phase 473 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Poor Enrollment)
Home-Based Extended Low Dose Buccal Misoprostol Versus Hospital-Based Standard Vaginal Dose In Management Of First Trimester Missed Abortion. [NCT03148314]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-06-30Not yet recruiting
Balloon + Oxytocin Versus Oral Misoprostol to Induce Labor in Case of Premature Rupture of Membranes (PROM) at Term in Nulliparous: a Randomized Controlled Trial (RUBAPRO2). [NCT05568745]Phase 4520 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-18Recruiting
Acceptability and Feasibility of Medical Abortion in Singapore: A Study of 800 μg Buccal Misoprostol Following 200 mg Mifepristone for Abortion Through 70 Days Gestation [NCT02985229]Phase 3130 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-31Completed
Different Routes of Misoprostol for Same-day Cervical Preparation Prior to First Trimester Surgical Abortion: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02480543]Phase 4120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-07-31Recruiting
Mifepristone and Misoprostol for 2nd Trimester Termination of Pregnancy (13-22 Weeks LMP) in Burkina Faso [NCT03269279]Phase 3100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-05-20Recruiting
Vaginal Misoprostol Before Elective Cesarean Section to Improve Neonatal Respiratory Outcomes . Randomized Controlled Clinical Study [NCT03239327]292 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-06-30Recruiting
Isosorbide Mononitrate and Misoprostol in Induction of Labour [NCT04482881]Early Phase 1130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-21Not yet recruiting
Effectiveness of Oral Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Before Office Hyteroscopy in Infertile Patients [NCT02409407]Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-04-30Recruiting
A Randomized Comparison of Transcervical Foley Bulb With Vaginal Misoprostol to Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Induction of Labor [NCT02566005]200 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
Cervical Ripening in Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Trial [NCT02534883]11 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-31Terminated(stopped due to not able to meet enrollment)
Outpatient Foley Catheter Compared to Usual Inpatient Care for Cervical Ripening: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02546193]39 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Unable to recruit/accrue adequate numbers of participants within funding period.)
Preoperative vs. Postoperative Misoprostol in Elective Cesarean Section: A Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT03144401]Phase 2/Phase 3240 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-10Completed
Sublingual Misoprostol Versus Placebo to Reduce Blood Loss During Elective Cesarean Delivery : A Randomized Controlled Study [NCT03140033]Phase 2158 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-07-31Recruiting
Sublingual Versus Vaginal Misoprostol In Medical Treatment of Second Trimestric Missed Miscarriage: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05088707]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-01Not yet recruiting
"A Study of Acceptability and Feasibility of an Outpatient Day Procedure for Medical Abortion at 13-18 Weeks Gestation in Two Public Sector Hospitals in Nepal" [NCT05046041]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-25Completed
Preoperative vs. Postoperative Rectal Misoprostol in Cesarean Section: A Randomized, Double Blind Clinical Trial [NCT03148717]Phase 2/Phase 3300 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-10Completed
Misoprostol Versus Expectant Management in Women With Incomplete First-trimester Miscarriage After Misoprostol Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT03148561]84 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-01Completed
Introducing Mifepristone-Misoprostol for Menstrual Regulation in Public Sector Facilities in Bangladesh [NCT01798017]Phase 41,738 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
Comparative Study Between Two Doses of Misoprostol in Women With Incomplete First-trimester Miscarriage After Misoprostol Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT05088720]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-01Not yet recruiting
Comparative Study Between Using Only Vaginal Misoprostol and Using Vaginal Misoprostol and Estradiol Cream for Induction of Labour [NCT05306405]Phase 1/Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-20Recruiting
Cervical Ripening for Induction of Labor: Misoprostol Versus Oxytocin in Conjunction With Foley Balloon [NCT01139801]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Standardized Versus Conventional Oxytocin and Uterotonic Agent Use for Cesarean Delivery [NCT01549223]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
[NCT02242214]106 participants (Actual)Observational [Patient Registry]2014-09-30Completed
The Misoprostol Vaginal Insert Used in Standard Compared With Adjusted Criteria for Labour Induction in Term Pregnancies: a Non-interventional Case Control Study [NCT03016208]138 participants (Actual)Observational2015-05-31Completed
A Randomized Comparison of Same-Day Oral Mifepristone-Misoprostol to Misoprostol Only for Cervical Preparation in Second Trimester Surgical Abortion [NCT02412618]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
The Effect of Adding Vaginal Evening Primrose Oil to Misoprostol During Induction of Second-trimester Missed Miscarriage; a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03584698]Phase 4144 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-01Completed
A Randomized Trial Comparing Oral Misoprostol Alone With Oral Misoprostol Followed by Oxytocin in Women Induced for Hypertension of Pregnancy [NCT03749902]Phase 4520 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-06Completed
Benefits of Use of 600 Microgram Misoprostol Vaginally Prior To Insertion Of An Intrauterine Device in Patients With Cesarean Scar: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03081442]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-11Completed
Alternative Provision of Medication Abortion Via Advance Provision [NCT03829696]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to The study is not proceeding at this time.)
Mifepristone as an Adjunct to Transcervical Balloon for Labor Induction (MiLI): A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT05097326]Phase 330 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-06-27Completed
The Efficacy and Safety of Tranexamic Acid Versus Uterotonic Agents in Reducing Blood Loss During and After Cesarean Section Among High-risk Patients: a Comparative Study [NCT06060327]444 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-15Not yet recruiting
Buccal Misoprostol During Cesarean Section for Preventing Postpartum Hemorrhage in Women With Risk Factors for Uterine Atony [NCT01733329]Phase 4123 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
A Comparison of Non-Surgical Treatment Methods for Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis [NCT01943435]259 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-20Completed
COMPARISON BETWEEN RECTAL & SUBLINGUAL MISOPROSTOL BEFORE CAESARIAN SECTION TO REDUCE INTRA & POST-OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS [NCT02083107]Phase 2/Phase 3636 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Completed
Comparative Study Between Combined Vaginal Misoprostol With Isosorbide-5-Mononitrate Versus Misoprostol Alone For Induction Of The First Trimester Missed Abortion A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT04981457]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-02Active, not recruiting
A Randomised Control Study of Titrated and Static Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor at Term [NCT04891679]264 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-01Completed
Sublingual vs Vaginal Misoprostol for Termination of First Trimesteric Missed Abortion [NCT05001061]Early Phase 1288 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-03Not yet recruiting
The RIPE Study: Ripening Interventions: Prostaglandins vs EASI Catheter [NCT00383942]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Change in treatment plan for this population terminated the project)
Adjuvant Isonicotinic Acid Hydrazide (INH) With Misoprostol for Induction of Abortion in First-trimester Missed Miscarriage Among Women With One or More Previous Cesarean Deliveries.: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04499976]Phase 4240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-01Not yet recruiting
Cervical Priming With Misoprostol Before Diagnostic Office Hysteroscopy in Patients With no Risk Factors for Experiencing Unacceptable Pain. A Randomized Double Blinded Placebo-controlled Study [NCT02318225]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-01-31Recruiting
Estradiol Pretreatment With Misoprostol in Second Trimester Miscarriage: A Prospective, Double-blind, Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT03479879]Phase 2/Phase 3200 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-21Completed
Low Dose Vaginal Misoprostol With or Without Foley Catheter for Late Second Trimester Pregnancy Termination in Women With Previous Multiple Cesarean Sections [NCT02989324]Phase 297 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-31Completed
Cervical Preparation Before Dilation and Evacuation in the Second Trimester: A Multicenter Randomized Trial Comparing Osmotic Dilators Alone to Dilators Plus Adjunctive Misoprostol or Adjunctive Mifepristone. [NCT01751087]300 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
Saving Lives at Birth in Uganda: Building and Sustaining Capacity of Frontline Health Workers - A Program Evaluation [NCT03254628]3,440 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-14Completed
Comparison Between Preoperative and Postoperative Sublingual Misoprostol for Prevention of Postpartum Blood Loss in Cesarean Section : a Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT03591913]Phase 4500 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-01Completed
Vaginal Misoprostol 600 mcg and 800 mcg In Medical Treatment of First Trimester Missed Miscarriage: A Randomized Controlled Trial. [NCT05094375]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-01Not yet recruiting
Comparative Efficacy of Lidocaine Spray Versus Vaginal Misoprostol in Reducing Pain During IUD Insertion in Adolescents and Nulliparous Women: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04339049]Phase 3147 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-05-01Completed
Measuring Response of Adding Isosorbide Mononitrate to Misoprostol in Induction of Second Trimester Abortion [NCT03407521]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-12Completed
Does the Administration of Prostaglandins Before Cesarean Section Reduce the Amount of Blood Loss ? [NCT03366259]Phase 2/Phase 3160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-12-31Not yet recruiting
Comparative Study Between Vaginal Dinoprostone and Vaginal Misoprostol Prior to IUD Insertion in Multiparous Overweight and Obese Women :a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04505917]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-01Not yet recruiting
A Pilot Study of Atorvastatin as a Potential Adjunct to Misoprostol for Termination of Pregnancy [NCT05342974]Early Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-19Recruiting
Outpatient Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction With Orally Administered Misoprostol for Term Pregnancies Complicated by Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00514618]5 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Poor enrollment)
Protocol Title: Reducing Complications and Patient Barriers in Second Trimester Abortion: Pre-Operative Effects of Mifepristone (POEM) on Dilatation and Evacuation Services [NCT01862991]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Completed
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Double Simultaneous Uterotonic Agents (Misoprostol Plus Intravenous Oxytocin) Versus Single Agent Regimen (Intravenous Oxytocin Only) to Prevent Early Postpartum Hemorrhage [NCT05245227]Phase 31,358 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-01Recruiting
Randomized, Placebo-controlled Double Blind Study of Preoperative Misorostol for Reduction of Intraoperative Bleeding in Women Delivered by Ceserean Section [NCT02509351]Phase 2/Phase 3280 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Completed
Mifepristone and Misoprostol Versus Misoprostol Alone for Uterine Evacuation After Early Pregnancy Failure: a Randomized Double Blind Placebo-controlled Comparison (Triple M Trial) [NCT03212352]Phase 4342 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-27Terminated(stopped due to Advised by DSMB based on interim-analysis, highly significant difference.)
Comparison of Misorostol & PGE2 Gel for Immediate Induction of Labour for Premature Ropture of Membranes at Term [NCT00355966]Phase 4212 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00120042 (2) [back to overview]Post-Delivery Blood Loss
NCT00120042 (2) [back to overview]Placental Retention Rate
NCT00308711 (9) [back to overview]Minutes From Drug Insertion to Vaginal Delivery
NCT00308711 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Pre-Delivery Oxytocin Use
NCT00308711 (9) [back to overview]Days in Hospital for Mother and Neonate
NCT00308711 (9) [back to overview]Minutes to Rupture of Membranes (ROM)
NCT00308711 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Maternal/Fetal, Maternal (Post-Partum), and Neonatal Adverse Events
NCT00308711 (9) [back to overview]Duration of Stay in Minutes in Labor and Delivery Suite
NCT00308711 (9) [back to overview]Minutes to Onset of Active Labor
NCT00308711 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Cesarean Section Delivery
NCT00308711 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Cervical Ripening Success Based On Modified Bishop Score (mBS) 12 Hours After Administration of Vaginal Insert
NCT00383942 (1) [back to overview]Proportion of Women Undergoing Cesarean Section for Fetal Intolerance of Labor
NCT00468299 (2) [back to overview]Number of Women With Complete Abortion 24-48hrs After Receiving Medical Treatment for Early Pregnancy Failure.
NCT00468299 (2) [back to overview]Complete Abortion at One Week
NCT00594854 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Upper Gastro-intestinal Injury Grade 4 as Measured by Lanza (1991) Score
NCT00594854 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Duodenal Ulcers Confirmed by Endoscopy
NCT00594854 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Gastric Ulcer Confirmed by Endoscopy
NCT00613366 (2) [back to overview]The Ease of IUD Insertion as Rated by the Provider Using a 100mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
NCT00613366 (2) [back to overview]Perceived Pain of IUD Insertion by Patient Using a 100mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
NCT00671060 (1) [back to overview]Successful Expulsion of Fetus and Placenta Within 48 Hours
NCT00835731 (6) [back to overview]Procedure Time for Dilation and Evacuation
NCT00835731 (6) [back to overview]Cervical Dilation in Women Following Exposure to Either Ripening Agent
NCT00835731 (6) [back to overview]Number of Patients for Whom Physician Was Able to Complete Dilation and Evacuation Procedure on First Attempt
NCT00835731 (6) [back to overview]Subject Pain During Dilation and Evacuation
NCT00835731 (6) [back to overview]Subject Pain During Ripening
NCT00835731 (6) [back to overview]Women's Satisfaction With Cervical Ripening Method
NCT00886834 (2) [back to overview]Patient Perceived Pain on a 100-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
NCT00886834 (2) [back to overview]Provider Perceived Ease of Insertion on a 100-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
NCT00906347 (8) [back to overview]Uterine Tachysystole
NCT00906347 (8) [back to overview]Method of Delivery
NCT00906347 (8) [back to overview]Admission of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
NCT00906347 (8) [back to overview]Infant Apgar Score <4
NCT00906347 (8) [back to overview]Maternal Chorioamnionitis
NCT00906347 (8) [back to overview]Maternal Hypovolemia Requiring Blood Transfusion
NCT00906347 (8) [back to overview]Time Elapsed From Start of Labor Augmentation to Delivery
NCT00906347 (8) [back to overview]Umbilical Cord Artery pH <7.1
NCT00925938 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT00925938 (5) [back to overview]Change in Diameter of the Internal Cervical os From Baseline (Pre-treatment) to Just Prior to the Hysteroscopy Procedure (Post-treatment).
NCT00925938 (5) [back to overview]Total Procedure Time From Insertion of the First Hegar Dilator to Completion of the Hysteroscopy Procedure;
NCT00925938 (5) [back to overview]Physician Assessment of Ease of Cervical Dilation;
NCT00925938 (5) [back to overview]Percent of Women Requiring Further Dilatation in Order to Allow Uterine Access
NCT01139801 (1) [back to overview]Rate of Induction To Delivery
NCT01147497 (3) [back to overview]The Use of Adjunctive Measures Including Ultrasound Guidance or Cervical Dilation to Insert the IUD
NCT01147497 (3) [back to overview]Provider Perceived Ease of Insertion on a 100 Point Visual Analogue Scale
NCT01147497 (3) [back to overview]Patient Perceived Pain on a 100 Point Visual Analogue Scale
NCT01279343 (10) [back to overview]Neonatal APGAR Scores
NCT01279343 (10) [back to overview]Chorioamnionitis
NCT01279343 (10) [back to overview]NICU Admission
NCT01279343 (10) [back to overview]Successful Number of Vaginal and Cesarean Deliveries
NCT01279343 (10) [back to overview]Time to Complete Cervical Dilation
NCT01279343 (10) [back to overview]Time From Start of Labor Induction to Vaginal Delivery
NCT01279343 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Post-partum Hemorrhage
NCT01279343 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Tachysystole With Deceleration
NCT01279343 (10) [back to overview]Delivery Within 24 Hours
NCT01279343 (10) [back to overview]Admission to NICU or Special Care Nursery
NCT01307111 (2) [back to overview]Patient Perceived Pain on a 100-point Visual Analogue Scale.
NCT01307111 (2) [back to overview]Provider Perceived Ease of Insertion on a 100-point Visual Analogue Scale.
NCT01422226 (1) [back to overview]Ease of IUD Insertion (Use of Ancillary Measures)
NCT01436266 (1) [back to overview]Blood Loss
NCT01519765 (21) [back to overview]Time to Active Labor
NCT01519765 (21) [back to overview]Failed Induction of Labor
NCT01519765 (21) [back to overview]Tachysystole With Abnormal FHT
NCT01519765 (21) [back to overview]Tachysystole
NCT01519765 (21) [back to overview]Rates of Vaginal Delivery
NCT01519765 (21) [back to overview]Pitocin
NCT01519765 (21) [back to overview]Number of Misoprostol Doses
NCT01519765 (21) [back to overview]Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Admission
NCT01519765 (21) [back to overview]Foley Bulb
NCT01519765 (21) [back to overview]Chorioamnionitis
NCT01519765 (21) [back to overview]Cesarean Delivery Rate
NCT01519765 (21) [back to overview]Artificial Rupture of Membranes (AROM)
NCT01519765 (21) [back to overview]Arrest of Dilation
NCT01519765 (21) [back to overview]APGARS
NCT01519765 (21) [back to overview]Patient Satisfaction With Buccal Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Administration.
NCT01519765 (21) [back to overview]Abnormal Fetal Heart Tracing (FHT)
NCT01519765 (21) [back to overview]Meconium
NCT01519765 (21) [back to overview]Time to Vaginal Delivery
NCT01519765 (21) [back to overview]Vaginal Delivery Within 24 Hours of Labor Induction
NCT01519765 (21) [back to overview]Patient Preference
NCT01519765 (21) [back to overview]Time to Delivery
NCT01549223 (2) [back to overview]1. Amount of Oxytocin to Obtain Satisfactory Uterine Tone.
NCT01549223 (2) [back to overview]Side Effects (Hypotension, Flushing, Nausea and Emesis) Associated With Uterotonic Drug Use
NCT01615731 (8) [back to overview]Maximum Cervical Dilation
NCT01615731 (8) [back to overview]Adverse Events
NCT01615731 (8) [back to overview]Total Procedure Time
NCT01615731 (8) [back to overview]Procedure Time
NCT01615731 (8) [back to overview]Overall Patient Experience
NCT01615731 (8) [back to overview]Ease of Procedure by Blinded Surgeon
NCT01615731 (8) [back to overview]Adverse Events (EBL)
NCT01615731 (8) [back to overview]Pain Perceived by Patient
NCT01634854 (6) [back to overview]Maternal Delivery Outcomes
NCT01634854 (6) [back to overview]Neonatal APGAR Scores
NCT01634854 (6) [back to overview]NICU Admission and APGAR Less Than 7 at 5 Minutes
NCT01634854 (6) [back to overview]Time From Induction to Vaginal Delivery
NCT01634854 (6) [back to overview]Neonatal Weight at Delivery
NCT01634854 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Excessive Uterine Activity Necessitating Treatment
NCT01636063 (1) [back to overview]Initial Cervical Dilation at the Time of Surgical Abortion
NCT01733329 (4) [back to overview]Postpartum Hemorrhage
NCT01733329 (4) [back to overview]Uterine Atony
NCT01733329 (4) [back to overview]Need for Additional Uterotonic Medications
NCT01733329 (4) [back to overview]Blood Loss
NCT01751087 (9) [back to overview]Physician Satisfaction With Cervical Preparation
NCT01751087 (9) [back to overview]Patient Satisfaction With Cervical Prep
NCT01751087 (9) [back to overview]Operative Time
NCT01751087 (9) [back to overview]Need for Mechanical Dilation
NCT01751087 (9) [back to overview]Initial Cervical Dilation
NCT01751087 (9) [back to overview]Ability to Complete the D&E on the First Attempt
NCT01751087 (9) [back to overview]Chills (Any) After Day 2 Medication Administration
NCT01751087 (9) [back to overview]Complications From Procedure
NCT01751087 (9) [back to overview]Ease of Mechanical Dilation
NCT01818414 (5) [back to overview]Complications
NCT01818414 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Postoperative Satisfaction
NCT01818414 (5) [back to overview]Number of Providers With Overall Satisfaction
NCT01818414 (5) [back to overview]Operative Time
NCT01818414 (5) [back to overview]Patient Pain
NCT01862991 (2) [back to overview]Adverse Events
NCT01862991 (2) [back to overview]Procedure Time
NCT01916681 (8) [back to overview]Severe RDS
NCT01916681 (8) [back to overview]Time to Active Labor
NCT01916681 (8) [back to overview]Time to Delivery
NCT01916681 (8) [back to overview]Length of Stay
NCT01916681 (8) [back to overview]Chorioamnionitis
NCT01916681 (8) [back to overview]Maternal Morbidity
NCT01916681 (8) [back to overview]Mode of Delivery
NCT01916681 (8) [back to overview]Regional Anesthesia
NCT01943435 (3) [back to overview]Sense Wear Armband
NCT01943435 (3) [back to overview]Swiss Spinal Stenosis (SSS) Questionnaire Score
NCT01943435 (3) [back to overview]Self Paced Walking Test (SPWT)
NCT02012491 (6) [back to overview]Adverse Event Reported by Participants
NCT02012491 (6) [back to overview]Gestational Sac Expulsion by the Second Follow-up Visit at Day 8
NCT02012491 (6) [back to overview]Gestational Sac Expulsion With One Treatment Dose on Day 3 (Visit 2) and no Need for Additional Medical or Surgical Intervention Within 30 Days of Treatment.
NCT02012491 (6) [back to overview]Uterine Asperation
NCT02012491 (6) [back to overview]Frequency of Serious Adverse Events Between Study Arms.
NCT02012491 (6) [back to overview]Gestational Sac Expulsion by the 30-day Telephone Call
NCT02083107 (10) [back to overview]Need for Extra Ecbolics (Oxytocin).
NCT02083107 (10) [back to overview]Incidence of Wound Sepsis
NCT02083107 (10) [back to overview]Incidence of Adverse Effects
NCT02083107 (10) [back to overview]APGAR Score
NCT02083107 (10) [back to overview]Time to Resume Bowel Habits
NCT02083107 (10) [back to overview]Need for Postoperative Blood Transfusion
NCT02083107 (10) [back to overview]Need for Extra Analgesics
NCT02083107 (10) [back to overview]Intraoperative Blood Loss
NCT02083107 (10) [back to overview]Change in Hematocrite Value
NCT02083107 (10) [back to overview]Change in Hemoglobin Concentration
NCT02141555 (4) [back to overview]Patient Enrollment
NCT02141555 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complete Abortion
NCT02141555 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Answered 1 or 2 on a Scale of Satisfaction With the Procedure
NCT02141555 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting 2 or 3 on a Scale of Medication Side Effects
NCT02314728 (2) [back to overview]Rate of Cesarean Section
NCT02314728 (2) [back to overview]Maternal and Neonatal Infectious Morbidity
NCT02408315 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Had Uterine Hyperstimulation
NCT02408315 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Neonatal Cord Gases Measured
NCT02408315 (9) [back to overview]Uterine Rupture
NCT02408315 (9) [back to overview]Number of Vaginal Deliveries That Occurred Within 24 Hours
NCT02408315 (9) [back to overview]Time to Delivery
NCT02408315 (9) [back to overview]Dose of Oxytocin Used for Augmentation
NCT02408315 (9) [back to overview]Number of Doses Misoprostol Used
NCT02408315 (9) [back to overview]Number of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Admission
NCT02408315 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Cesarean Deliveries Based on Fetal Non-Reassurance Indications
NCT02411916 (1) [back to overview]Change in Hemoglobin
NCT02412618 (2) [back to overview]Initial Cervical Dilation
NCT02412618 (2) [back to overview]Patient Acceptability and Assessment of Pain and Side Effects (5-point Likert Scale)
NCT02534883 (6) [back to overview]Dilation Time in Minutes
NCT02534883 (6) [back to overview]Resistance Score
NCT02534883 (6) [back to overview]Efficacy (Cervical Ripening)
NCT02534883 (6) [back to overview]Maximum Dilator Size
NCT02534883 (6) [back to overview]Number of Recorded Side Effects.
NCT02534883 (6) [back to overview]Number of Complications
NCT02546193 (15) [back to overview]Number of Infants Per Gender
NCT02546193 (15) [back to overview]Pre-delivery Hospitalization Time
NCT02546193 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Postpartum Complications
NCT02546193 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Normal Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery
NCT02546193 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Intrapartum Complications
NCT02546193 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants Per Method of Induction Used
NCT02546193 (15) [back to overview]Mean Umbilical Cord Blood Gases
NCT02546193 (15) [back to overview]Mean Time of Delivery
NCT02546193 (15) [back to overview]Mean Score on Maternal Satisfaction Survey
NCT02546193 (15) [back to overview]Mean Readmission Rate
NCT02546193 (15) [back to overview]Mean Estimated Blood Loss at Delivery
NCT02546193 (15) [back to overview]Mean Dose of Medication for Pain Relief
NCT02546193 (15) [back to overview]Mean Birth Weight
NCT02546193 (15) [back to overview]Mean APGAR Scores
NCT02546193 (15) [back to overview]Number of Infants With Neonatal Morbidity or Mortality, Categorized by Reason.
NCT02566005 (11) [back to overview]The Time From Active Phase to Delivery
NCT02566005 (11) [back to overview]The Time From Induction Until to Active Phase Labor
NCT02566005 (11) [back to overview]The Time Interval From Induction to Delivery: All Participants
NCT02566005 (11) [back to overview]Time (Hours) From Induction to Delivery: Multiparous
NCT02566005 (11) [back to overview]Time (Hours) From Induction to Delivery: Nulliparous
NCT02566005 (11) [back to overview]Time From Induction to Delivery: CD
NCT02566005 (11) [back to overview]Time From Induction to Delivery: VD
NCT02566005 (11) [back to overview]Estimated Blood Loss
NCT02566005 (11) [back to overview]Incidence of Chorioamnionitis
NCT02566005 (11) [back to overview]Incidence of Uterine Tachysystole
NCT02566005 (11) [back to overview]Per Treatment Protocol: Time (Hours) From Induction to Delivery
NCT02639429 (13) [back to overview]Number of Newborns With Transient Tachypnea (TTN)
NCT02639429 (13) [back to overview]Induction-to-delivery Interval in Hours
NCT02639429 (13) [back to overview]Number of Newborns Admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU)
NCT02639429 (13) [back to overview]Number of Newborns With Culture-proven Sepsis
NCT02639429 (13) [back to overview]Number of Newborns With Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS)
NCT02639429 (13) [back to overview]Number of Newborns With Seizures
NCT02639429 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Need for Oxytocin Augmentation
NCT02639429 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Exhibiting Tachysystole Resulting in Fetal Heart Rate Abnormalities
NCT02639429 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Need for Cesarean Delivery
NCT02639429 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Need for Operative Vaginal Delivery
NCT02639429 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinical Chorioamnionitis
NCT02639429 (13) [back to overview]Composite Maternal Morbidity as Indicated by the Number of Participants With Measures of Maternal Morbidity
NCT02639429 (13) [back to overview]Composite Neonatal Morbidity as Indicated by the Number of Newborns With Measures of Neonatal Morbidity
NCT02680314 (2) [back to overview]To Determine the Interval From Initiation of Misoprostol to Delivery in Each Group
NCT02680314 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Vaginal Delivery Within 24 Hours
NCT02777190 (13) [back to overview]Rate of Anti-emetic Use
NCT02777190 (13) [back to overview]Rate of Chorioamnionitis
NCT02777190 (13) [back to overview]Time to Initiation of Oxytocin for Labor Augmentation
NCT02777190 (13) [back to overview]Neonatal Morbidity
NCT02777190 (13) [back to overview]Rate of Abandoning Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Switching to Mechanical Dilation for Cervical Ripening
NCT02777190 (13) [back to overview]Cesarean Section Rate
NCT02777190 (13) [back to overview]Time to Active Labor
NCT02777190 (13) [back to overview]Time to Vaginal Delivery
NCT02777190 (13) [back to overview]Rate of Vaginal Delivery Within 24 Hours
NCT02777190 (13) [back to overview]Rate of Tachysystole Causing Non-reassuring Fetal Heart Tones
NCT02777190 (13) [back to overview]Rate of Tachysystole
NCT02777190 (13) [back to overview]Rate of Need for Tocolysis
NCT02777190 (13) [back to overview]Rate of Meconium Stained Fluid
NCT02957305 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Presence of a Uterine Cervical Canal With ≥8 mm of Dilation
NCT02957305 (2) [back to overview]Pain Score (VAS)
NCT03134183 (2) [back to overview]Cervical Dilation
NCT03134183 (2) [back to overview]Procedure Time
NCT03407625 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants Administered Neonatal Antibiotics and/or Neonatal Blood Cultures
NCT03407625 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants That Needed Mechanical Ventilation in Delivery Room (Yes/No)
NCT03407625 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants Used General Anesthesia for Delivery
NCT03407625 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With an 5-minute Apgar Score Less Than 4
NCT03407625 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Blood Transfusion
NCT03407625 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Excess Blood Loss
NCT03407625 (20) [back to overview]Time With Foley Bulb in Place
NCT03407625 (20) [back to overview]Time to Delivery
NCT03407625 (20) [back to overview]Presence of Chorioamnionitis
NCT03407625 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Vaginal Delivery
NCT03407625 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Uterine Rupture
NCT03407625 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Unplanned Hysterectomy
NCT03407625 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Umbilical Cord Blood pH <7.0
NCT03407625 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Uterine Hyperstimulation Syndrome
NCT03407625 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Neonatal Sepsis
NCT03407625 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With NICU Admission Order
NCT03407625 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Postpartum Fever
NCT03407625 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Tachysystole
NCT03407625 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants Used Neuraxial Analgesia During Labor
NCT03407625 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Meconium-stained Amniotic Fluid
NCT03617172 (2) [back to overview]Number of Recurrences During the Follow-up Period
NCT03617172 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinical Recurrence of Clostridium Difficile Infection (CDI).
NCT05216952 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events
NCT05216952 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Adherent to Study Protocol
NCT05216952 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Side Effects
NCT05216952 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Recruited to Study Protocol
NCT05216952 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Resolution of Early Pregnancy Loss Following Study Intervention
NCT05216952 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Retained in Study Protocol
NCT05216952 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants Needing Additional Medication for Resolution of Early Pregnancy Loss
NCT05216952 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants Needing Surgical Management for Resolution of Early Pregnancy Loss
NCT05216952 (9) [back to overview]Median Acceptability of Study Intervention

Post-Delivery Blood Loss

Blood loss was assessed by weighing of pads and sheets in addition to clot (NCT00120042)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionmls (Median)
1200
2100
3200

[back to top]

Placental Retention Rate

If spontaneous expulsion of the placenta within 60 minutes of fetal delivery did not occur, digital exploration of the uterus in the operating room was planned. (NCT00120042)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
126
28
324

[back to top]

Minutes From Drug Insertion to Vaginal Delivery

Interval between time/date of insertion of study drug and time/date of neonate birth. This is a time-to-event analysis, there is no set time for the assessment. The endpoint occurs when the baby is born. 48 hours can be used as an approximate interval by which time most of the babies have been delivered. (NCT00308711)
Timeframe: 2880 minutes

Interventionminutes (Median)
Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI) 1001595.5
Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI) 502127
Cervidil 10 mg Vaginal Insert1649.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Pre-Delivery Oxytocin Use

Incidence in each treatment group of need for oxytocin for pre-delivery induction or augmentation of labor. (NCT00308711)
Timeframe: 2880 minutes

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI) 10068.5
Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI) 5080.8
Cervidil 10 mg Vaginal Insert69.0

[back to top]

Days in Hospital for Mother and Neonate

Duration of stay in hospital for mother and neonate starting with insertion of the study drug and ending with discharge from the hospital. (NCT00308711)
Timeframe: 10 days

,,
Interventiondays (Mean)
MotherNeonate
Cervidil 10 mg Vaginal Insert4.53.6
Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI) 1004.53.6
Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI) 504.73.5

[back to top]

Minutes to Rupture of Membranes (ROM)

Interval from study drug insertion to ROM. (NCT00308711)
Timeframe: 2880 minutes

Interventionminutes (Median)
Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI) 1001285.0
Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI) 501364.0
Cervidil 10 mg Vaginal Insert1123

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Maternal/Fetal, Maternal (Post-Partum), and Neonatal Adverse Events

"This outcome reports the percentage of adverse events in each treatment arm spontaneously reported or observed during the study. The intrapartum period (mother is still pregnant) is called the Maternal/Fetal period; once the baby has been born, adverse events are assessed separately for the mother (Post Partum) and the baby (Neonatal). The number of adverse events was assessed separately for each of the three periods." (NCT00308711)
Timeframe: 96 hours

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Maternal/FetalMaternal (Post-Partum)Neonatal
Cervidil 10 mg Vaginal Insert652727
Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI) 100652929
Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI) 50642624

[back to top]

Duration of Stay in Minutes in Labor and Delivery Suite

Minutes in Labor and Delivery (L & D) suite starting from insertion of the study drug to discharge from L & D to post partum care. (NCT00308711)
Timeframe: 5760 minuts

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI) 1001683.6
Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI) 502010
Cervidil 10 mg Vaginal Insert1729

[back to top]

Minutes to Onset of Active Labor

Interval from insertion of study drug to onset of active labor, defined as at least three contractions in a ten-minute period of at least moderate intensity and resulting in cervical change such as dilatation or effacement; OR at least 4 cm cervical dilatation achieved after progressive change in dilatation. (NCT00308711)
Timeframe: 2880 minutes

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI) 1001032.5
Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI) 501343.7
Cervidil 10 mg Vaginal Insert1005.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Cesarean Section Delivery

Percentage of participants with cesarean delivery after study drug was administered. There is no set assessment time or date as the woman's labor may last hours or days. (NCT00308711)
Timeframe: 2880 minutes

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI) 10028
Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI) 5028
Cervidil 10 mg Vaginal Insert26

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Cervical Ripening Success Based On Modified Bishop Score (mBS) 12 Hours After Administration of Vaginal Insert

Measured the percentage of participants who achieved success on the mBS. This composite score is based on the mBS and vaginal delivery and it is measured 12 hours after insertion of the study drug. The mBS has a score of 0 when the cervix is not ripe and a score of 12 when completely ripened. The 12 hour score is compared to baseline. Using the mBS, assess at 12 hours whether each subject has met any of the following three criteria: 1) has improved (increased) the mBS by at least 3 points from baseline; 2) has reached a score of at least 6 on the mBS; or 3) has acheived a vaginal delivery. (NCT00308711)
Timeframe: 12 hours

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI) 10059
Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI) 5050
Cervidil 10 mg Vaginal Insert60

[back to top]

Proportion of Women Undergoing Cesarean Section for Fetal Intolerance of Labor

The number of women undergoing cesarean section will be compared between the misoprostol arm and EASI arm. The primary hypothesis is that the odds of receiving a cesarean section is lower among patients assigned to EASI when compared to patients who receive misoprostol. (NCT00383942)
Timeframe: At time of delivery

Intervention ()
Misoprostol0
EASI0

[back to top]

Number of Women With Complete Abortion 24-48hrs After Receiving Medical Treatment for Early Pregnancy Failure.

(NCT00468299)
Timeframe: 24-48 hrs

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Misoprostol and Placebo5
Mifepristone and Misoprostol5

[back to top]

Complete Abortion at One Week

Complete abortion at one week; uterus demonstrated to be empty on transvaginal ultrasound (NCT00468299)
Timeframe: 3 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Misoprostol and Placebo6
Mifepristone and Misoprostol7

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Upper Gastro-intestinal Injury Grade 4 as Measured by Lanza (1991) Score

The degree of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) injury as measured by Lanza scores (1991) during treatment with PN 400 and ARTHROTEC® in a high-risk population. The Lanza (1991) score is based on endoscopic obeservations and rating these, with no damage, petecchiae, erosions and ulcers. On the 1991 scale, a Lanza score of 0 represents normal mucosa (no damage), while a score of 4 indicates 6-10 erosions, and a score of 7 indicates an ulcer. (NCT00594854)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PN400 (VIMOVO)2
Arthrotec2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Duodenal Ulcers Confirmed by Endoscopy

Number of participants with duodenal ulcers confirmed by endoscopy following administration of PN 400 VIMOVO)or Arthrotec in a high risk population (NCT00594854)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PN400 (VIMOVO)0
Arthrotec1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Gastric Ulcer Confirmed by Endoscopy

Number of participants with gastric ulcers confirmed by endoscopy following administration of PN 400 (VIMOVO) or Arthrotec in a high risk population over six months. (NCT00594854)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
PN400 (VIMOVO)2
Arthrotec1

[back to top]

The Ease of IUD Insertion as Rated by the Provider Using a 100mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

"Provider ease of insertion was measured using a 100mm visual analog scale (VAS).The 100mm Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is an instrument used to capture subjective attitudes that cannot be directly measured. When responding to a VAS item, respondents specify their level of pain by indicating a position along a 100mm continues line: pain scores can range from 0=No Pain (furthest point to the left) to 100=Worst Pain of My Life (furthest point to the right)." (NCT00613366)
Timeframe: Time of IUD insertion

Interventionmm (Mean)
Active Drug (Misoprostol)24
Placebo29

[back to top]

Perceived Pain of IUD Insertion by Patient Using a 100mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

"Perceived pain measured using a 100mm visual analog scale (VAS).The 100mm Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is an instrument used to capture subjective attitudes that cannot be directly measured. When responding to a VAS item, respondents specify their level of pain by indicating a position along a 100mm continues line: pain scores can range from 0=No Pain (furthest point to the left) to 100=Worst Pain of My Life (furthest point to the right)." (NCT00613366)
Timeframe: At time of IUD insertion

Interventionmm (Mean)
Active Drug (Misoprostol)65
Placebo55

[back to top]

Successful Expulsion of Fetus and Placenta Within 48 Hours

(NCT00671060)
Timeframe: 48 hours

Interventionparticipants (Number)
200 Mcg60
100 Mcg47

[back to top]

Procedure Time for Dilation and Evacuation

(NCT00835731)
Timeframe: 3-4 hours after placement of ripening agent

Interventionminutes (Median)
Misoprostol2.8
Synthetic Osmotic Dilator3.0

[back to top]

Cervical Dilation in Women Following Exposure to Either Ripening Agent

(NCT00835731)
Timeframe: 3-4 hours after placement of ripening agent

Interventionmm (Mean)
Misoprostol32.1
Synthetic Osmotic Dilator33.9

[back to top]

Number of Patients for Whom Physician Was Able to Complete Dilation and Evacuation Procedure on First Attempt

(NCT00835731)
Timeframe: 3-4 hours after placement of ripening agent

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Misoprostol62
Synthetic Osmotic Dilator60

[back to top]

Subject Pain During Dilation and Evacuation

"Measure assesses subject pain during dilation and evacuation. Pain was assessed immediately after the D&E procedure. Subjects were asked to rate pain on a 6 point Likert scale:~0 = no pain 1-2 = mild pain 3 = moderate pain 4-5 = severe pain~Higher values represent a worse outcome." (NCT00835731)
Timeframe: 3-4 hours after placement of ripening agent

InterventionScores on a scale (Median)
Misoprostol3
Synthetic Osmotic Dilator3

[back to top]

Subject Pain During Ripening

"Measure assesses patient pain during cervical preparation. Pain was assessed after cervical ripening was complete, immediately before D&E procedure. Subjects were asked to rate pain on a 6 point Likert scale:~0 = no pain 1-2 = mild pain 3 = moderate pain 4-5 = severe pain~Higher values represent a worse outcome." (NCT00835731)
Timeframe: 3-4 hours after placement of ripening agent

InterventionScores on a scale (Median)
Misoprostol1
Synthetic Osmotic Dilator1

[back to top]

Women's Satisfaction With Cervical Ripening Method

"Scale:~1 = very dissatisfied, 2 = dissatisfied, 3 = neutral, 4 = satisfied, 5 = very satisfied" (NCT00835731)
Timeframe: 5 hours after placement of ripening agent

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Misoprostol4
Synthetic Osmotic Dilator4

[back to top]

Patient Perceived Pain on a 100-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

VAS; anchors: 0 =none, 100 mm= worst imaginable (NCT00886834)
Timeframe: prior to insertion, immediately after insertion, and prior to clinic discharge

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
prior to insertionimmediately after insertionprior to clinic discharge
Misoprostol17.158.435.1
Placebo4.856.927.5

[back to top]

Provider Perceived Ease of Insertion on a 100-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

VAS (anchors: 0 = extremely easy, 100 mm= impossible) (NCT00886834)
Timeframe: Immediately post IUD insertion

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Misoprostol25.1
Placebo27.4

[back to top]

Uterine Tachysystole

Defined as six contractions in two consecutive 10-minute periods (NCT00906347)
Timeframe: Up to four hours after administration of study drug

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Misoprostol Augmentation50
Oxytocin Augmentation41

[back to top]

Method of Delivery

(NCT00906347)
Timeframe: At delivery

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Spontaneous vaginalForcepsCesarean for dystociaCesarean for nonreassuring fetal heart rate
Misoprostol Augmentation1534118
Oxytocin Augmentation1542135

[back to top]

Admission of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

(NCT00906347)
Timeframe: Until hospital discharge

Interventioninfants (Number)
Misoprostol Augmentation1
Oxytocin Augmentation0

[back to top]

Infant Apgar Score <4

Assigned on a scale of 0-10 by pediatric provider attending delivery. A lower score reflects need for further resuscitation and is potentially associated with increased risk of adverse neurological outcomes. (NCT00906347)
Timeframe: 5 minutes after delivery

Interventioninfants (Number)
Misoprostol Augmentation0
Oxytocin Augmentation0

[back to top]

Maternal Chorioamnionitis

Temperature 38 degrees C or higher in the absence of other sources of infection (NCT00906347)
Timeframe: During labor

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Misoprostol Augmentation28
Oxytocin Augmentation32

[back to top]

Maternal Hypovolemia Requiring Blood Transfusion

(NCT00906347)
Timeframe: Until hospital discharge

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Misoprostol Augmentation6
Oxytocin Augmentation2

[back to top]

Time Elapsed From Start of Labor Augmentation to Delivery

(NCT00906347)
Timeframe: Initiation of augmentation until delivery

Interventionminutes (Median)
Misoprostol Augmentation306
Oxytocin Augmentation276

[back to top]

Umbilical Cord Artery pH <7.1

(NCT00906347)
Timeframe: Obtained at delivery

Interventioninfants (Number)
Misoprostol Augmentation3
Oxytocin Augmentation4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events

(NCT00925938)
Timeframe: 9 days

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
MVPI 400 Mcg100
MVPI 800 Mcg92.0
MVPI Placebo82.4

[back to top]

Change in Diameter of the Internal Cervical os From Baseline (Pre-treatment) to Just Prior to the Hysteroscopy Procedure (Post-treatment).

(NCT00925938)
Timeframe: Baseline to 18-24 hours

Interventionmm (Mean)
MVPI 400 Mcg2.2
MVPI 800 Mcg2.3
MVPI Placebo1.5

[back to top]

Total Procedure Time From Insertion of the First Hegar Dilator to Completion of the Hysteroscopy Procedure;

(NCT00925938)
Timeframe: 18 - 24 hours

Interventionminutes (Mean)
MVPI 400 Mcg3.26
MVPI 800 Mcg3.75
MVPI Placebo2.32

[back to top]

Physician Assessment of Ease of Cervical Dilation;

(NCT00925938)
Timeframe: 18 - 24 hours

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
InadequateAdequate/ Correct SoftnessOver Primed/ Too soft
MVPI 400 Mcg22.266.711.1
MVPI 800 Mcg36.048.016.0
MVPI Placebo47.152.90

[back to top]

Percent of Women Requiring Further Dilatation in Order to Allow Uterine Access

(NCT00925938)
Timeframe: 18 - 24 hours

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Subjects requring additional dilatationTarget Dilation Achieved following 2ndry dilation
MVPI 400 Mcg88.9100
MVPI 800 Mcg84.085.0
MVPI Placebo100100

[back to top]

Rate of Induction To Delivery

To assess effectiveness of misoprostol used in conjunction with Foley balloon versus the standard oxytocin regimen in regards to induction times (NCT01139801)
Timeframe: 24 hrs

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Oxytocin732.19
Misoprostol944.35

[back to top]

The Use of Adjunctive Measures Including Ultrasound Guidance or Cervical Dilation to Insert the IUD

(NCT01147497)
Timeframe: assessed immediately after IUD insertion

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Misoprostol7
Placebo3

[back to top]

Provider Perceived Ease of Insertion on a 100 Point Visual Analogue Scale

The visual analogue scale for perceived ease ranges from 0 (most ease) to 100 (most difficult). (NCT01147497)
Timeframe: assessed immediately post IUD insertion

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Misoprostol21
Placebo21

[back to top]

Patient Perceived Pain on a 100 Point Visual Analogue Scale

The visual analogue scale for perceived patient pain ranges from 0 (no pain) to 100 (most pain). (NCT01147497)
Timeframe: immediately after insertion

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Misoprostol46
Placebo34

[back to top]

Neonatal APGAR Scores

"APGAR scores will be recorded at 1 and 5 minutes after birth. In the test, five things are used to check a baby's health. Each is scored on a scale of 0 to 2, with 2 being the best score:~Appearance (skin color) Pulse (heart rate) Grimace response (reflexes) Activity (muscle tone) Respiration (breathing rate and effort)" (NCT01279343)
Timeframe: 5 minutes

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
1 minute apgar scord5 minute apgar score
Foley Bulb Plus Misoprostol89
Misoprostol89

[back to top]

Chorioamnionitis

(NCT01279343)
Timeframe: 96 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Foley Bulb Plus Misoprostol5
Misoprostol7

[back to top]

NICU Admission

(NCT01279343)
Timeframe: 96 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Foley Bulb Plus Misoprostol0
Misoprostol2

[back to top]

Successful Number of Vaginal and Cesarean Deliveries

To compare the number of vaginal deliveries to failed inductions requiring cesarean deliveries. (NCT01279343)
Timeframe: 72 hours

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Vaginal deliveryCesarean delivery
Foley Bulb Plus Misoprostol4115
Misoprostol4516

[back to top]

Time to Complete Cervical Dilation

We will record the start time of induction until the patient's cervix is 10cm dilated (NCT01279343)
Timeframe: 72 hours

Interventionhour (Mean)
Foley Bulb Plus Misoprostol13.7
Misoprostol17.1

[back to top]

Time From Start of Labor Induction to Vaginal Delivery

(NCT01279343)
Timeframe: 72 hours

Interventionhour (Mean)
Foley Bulb Plus Misoprostol15.3
Misoprostol18.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Post-partum Hemorrhage

(NCT01279343)
Timeframe: 96 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Foley Bulb Plus Misoprostol2
Misoprostol5

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Tachysystole With Deceleration

(NCT01279343)
Timeframe: 72 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Foley Bulb Plus Misoprostol10
Misoprostol12

[back to top]

Delivery Within 24 Hours

(NCT01279343)
Timeframe: Delivery within 24 hours of induction

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Foley Bulb Plus Misoprostol49
Misoprostol46

[back to top]

Admission to NICU or Special Care Nursery

(NCT01279343)
Timeframe: birth to 96 hours of age

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Foley Bulb Plus Misoprostol8
Misoprostol11

[back to top]

Patient Perceived Pain on a 100-point Visual Analogue Scale.

Perceived pain was registered on a 100-point visual analogue scale (0 = no pain, 100 = worst pain imaginable) at three time points: prior to IUD insertion, immediately after insertion, and prior to clinic discharge. (NCT01307111)
Timeframe: Prior to insertion, immediately after insertion, and prior to clinic discharge.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pain perceived prior to insertionPain perceived immediately after insertionPain perceived prior to clinic discharge
Misoprostol0.55.83.2
Placebo0.85.93.8

[back to top]

Provider Perceived Ease of Insertion on a 100-point Visual Analogue Scale.

Perceived ease of IUD insertion registered on a visual analogue scale (0 = easy, 100 = extremely difficult). (NCT01307111)
Timeframe: Immediately post IUD insertion

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Misoprostol2.2
Placebo2.5

[back to top]

Ease of IUD Insertion (Use of Ancillary Measures)

The primary outcome is the proportion in each group able to have the IUD inserted in a standard fashion without the ancillary measures of mechanical dilation of the cervix, placement of paracervical nerve block, or using abdominal ultrasound for guidance. The null hypothesis for the primary outcome is that misoprostol does not influence difficulty of insertion. (NCT01422226)
Timeframe: During the IUD insertion procedure, up to 2 hours

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Experimental Active Comparator1
Placebo Comparator2

[back to top]

Blood Loss

500 cc or more (NCT01436266)
Timeframe: one day following the procedure

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Active Comparator: Misoprostol0
Placebo Comparator: Placebo (Folic Acid)0

[back to top]

Time to Active Labor

Time from induction to active labor. Active labor defined as 4 cm and above. P-value computed by Kruskal-Wallis test. (NCT01519765)
Timeframe: Until active labor

Interventionhours (Median)
Buccal Misoprostol22.1
Vaginal Misoprostol19.4

[back to top]

Failed Induction of Labor

"Percentage of participants who were determined as a failed induction of labor. Failed induction was defined as no cervical change despite 24 hours of pitocin or 12 hours of pitocin after rupture of membranes.~P value was computed by Fisher exact test." (NCT01519765)
Timeframe: Until delivery

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Buccal Misoprostol0
Vaginal Misoprostol0

[back to top]

Tachysystole With Abnormal FHT

"Feta heart tracing was reviewed for every participant until 4 hours from last misoprostol dose.~Percentage of participants who presented with tachysystole and abnormal fetal heart tracing was computed.~Abnormal fetal heart tracing was defined as category 2 and above. Tachysystole was defined as more than 5 uterine contractions within 10 minutes. P values were computed by Fisher exact test." (NCT01519765)
Timeframe: Until 4 hours after last misoprostol dose

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Buccal Misoprostol5.9
Vaginal Misoprostol8.8

[back to top]

Tachysystole

Fetal heart tracing was reviewed until 4 hours after last misoprostol dose. Percentage of participant with tachysystole were computed. Tachysystole was defined as more than five uterine contractions in 10 minutes. P value was computed using Fisher exact test (NCT01519765)
Timeframe: Until 4 hours after last misoprostol dose

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Buccal Misoprostol26.5
Vaginal Misoprostol32.4

[back to top]

Rates of Vaginal Delivery

Percentage of participants who delivered vaginally (NCT01519765)
Timeframe: Until delivery

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Buccal Misoprostol58.8
Vaginal Misoprostol70.6

[back to top]

Pitocin

Percentage of patients that used pitocin during labor. P-values were computed using Fisher exact test. (NCT01519765)
Timeframe: Until delivery

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Buccal Misoprostol97.1
Vaginal Misoprostol82.4

[back to top]

Number of Misoprostol Doses

Number of misoprostol 25 mcg doses used during induction of labor. (NCT01519765)
Timeframe: Until delivery

Interventiondoses (Median)
Buccal Misoprostol2
Vaginal Misoprostol2

[back to top]

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Admission

"Percentage of participants whose baby was admitted to NICU was computed from time to delivery to time of hospital discharge.~P-value was computed using Fisher Exact test." (NCT01519765)
Timeframe: Until discharge from hospital

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Buccal Misoprostol20.6
Vaginal Misoprostol11.8

[back to top]

Foley Bulb

Percentage of participants that required foley bulb use. (NCT01519765)
Timeframe: Until delivery

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Buccal Misoprostol38.2
Vaginal Misoprostol41.2

[back to top]

Chorioamnionitis

Percentage of participants affected with chorioamnionitis (NCT01519765)
Timeframe: Until 48 hours after delivery

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Buccal Misoprostol17.6
Vaginal Misoprostol14.7

[back to top]

Cesarean Delivery Rate

Percentage of participants who underwent a cesarean delivery was computed. P-value was computed using Fisher's exact test. (NCT01519765)
Timeframe: Until delivery

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Buccal Misoprostol41.2
Vaginal Misoprostol29.4

[back to top]

Artificial Rupture of Membranes (AROM)

Percentage of participants that required AROM (NCT01519765)
Timeframe: Until delivery

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Buccal Misoprostol64.7
Vaginal Misoprostol67.6

[back to top]

Arrest of Dilation

"Percentage of participants who presented with arrest of dilation. Arrest of dilation was determined by the delivering physician.~P-value was computed using Fisher exact test." (NCT01519765)
Timeframe: Until delivery

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Buccal Misoprostol29.4
Vaginal Misoprostol14.7

[back to top]

APGARS

"Median (APGAR) score at 5 minutes after delivery. APGAR: Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, Respiration Apgar scale is determine by evaluating a newborn on 5 categories on a scale from 0 to 2, then summing up the five values.~Score range is 0 to 10. Score above 7 are generally normal. Score below 3 may indicated poor status." (NCT01519765)
Timeframe: 5 minutes after delivery

Interventionscore (Median)
Buccal Misoprostol9
Vaginal Misoprostol9

[back to top]

Patient Satisfaction With Buccal Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Administration.

"All patients were given a patient satisfaction survey. Patients were asked to use a Likert scale to rate their experience on the following:~Likert sub-scale: 1 to 5~1=Not at all/ Never to 5= Very Much/ Always~Nausea and vomiting 1=better outcome 5=worse outcome~effectiveness of misoprostol 1=worse outcome 5=better outcome~concerns of misoprostol 1=better outcome 5=worse outcome~overall labor experience 1=worse outcome 5=better outcome Patients will be followed for the duration of their labor(usually up to 72hrs). The satisfaction survey will be conducted after delivery but will evaluate side effects that they recollect in labor." (NCT01519765)
Timeframe: Until 72 hours after delivery

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Nausea/ VomitingEffectivenessPatient ConcernLabor satisfaction
Buccal Misoprostol1424
Vaginal Misoprostol1414

[back to top]

Abnormal Fetal Heart Tracing (FHT)

"Feta heart tracing was reviewed for every participant until 4 hours from last misoprostol dose.~Percentage of participants who presented with abnormal fetal heart tracing was computed.~Abnormal fetal heart tracing was defined as category 2 and 3 fetal heart tracing according to standard criteria.~Abnormal fetal heart tracing included any of the following tachycardia, bradycardia without absent variability, minimal variability, absent variability with or without recurrent decelerations, marked variability, prolonged deceleration and recurrent late deceleration, sinusoidal pattern.~P values were computed by Fisher exact test." (NCT01519765)
Timeframe: Until 4 hours of last misoprostol dose

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Buccal Misoprostol15.2
Vaginal Misoprostol20.6

[back to top]

Meconium

Percentage of participants who developed meconium was computed. Presence of meconium was evaluated by the delivering physician. P-value was computed using Fisher exact test. (NCT01519765)
Timeframe: Until delivery

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Buccal Misoprostol23.5
Vaginal Misoprostol23.5

[back to top]

Time to Vaginal Delivery

Time from start of induction to vaginal delivery was computed in participants who achieved vaginal delivery. (NCT01519765)
Timeframe: Start of induction until vaginal delivery

Interventionhours (Median)
Buccal Misoprostol33.3
Vaginal Misoprostol26.5

[back to top]

Vaginal Delivery Within 24 Hours of Labor Induction

Percentage of participants able to achieve vaginal delivery within 24 hours of labor induction. (NCT01519765)
Timeframe: Within 24 hours of labor induction

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Buccal Misoprostol14.7
Vaginal Misoprostol23.5

[back to top]

Patient Preference

All patients were given a patient satisfaction survey after delivery. They were asked to select their preference for misoprostol intervention type: buccal, vaginal, or either. (NCT01519765)
Timeframe: Until 72 hours after delivery

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
BuccalVaginalEither
Buccal Misoprostol1911
Vaginal Misoprostol1834

[back to top]

Time to Delivery

Time from induction to delivery. All participants were included. (NCT01519765)
Timeframe: Until delivery

Interventionhours (Median)
Buccal Misoprostol34.1
Vaginal Misoprostol27.5

[back to top]

1. Amount of Oxytocin to Obtain Satisfactory Uterine Tone.

Will measure total amount of oxytocin to achieve satisfactory uterine tone, as determined by the operating obstetrician. (NCT01549223)
Timeframe: Up to 15 min from time of infant delivery

InterventionIU (Mean)
Standard Care Group8.4
Protocol Group4.0

[back to top]

Side Effects (Hypotension, Flushing, Nausea and Emesis) Associated With Uterotonic Drug Use

Number of subjects experiencing hypotension, flushing, nausea, and emesis reported after administration of uterotonic agents. (NCT01549223)
Timeframe: Up to 15 min from time of infant delivery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard Care Group3
Protocol Group2

[back to top]

Maximum Cervical Dilation

Measured by estimate with bimanual exam and passage of largest dilator immediately prior to procedure. (NCT01615731)
Timeframe: Measured intra-operatively

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pre-op Cervical Dilation 2 cmPre-op Cervical Dilation 3 cmPre-Op Cervical Dilation 4 cmPre-Op Cervical Dilation 5 cm
Mifepristone Plus One Set of Dilators31451
Two Sets of Dilators2982

[back to top]

Adverse Events

uterine perforation, uterine injury, etc. (NCT01615731)
Timeframe: Intraoperatively and 2 weeks post operatively

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Pre-Procedure DeliveryCervical InjuryRUpture of Membranes with Subsequent Fever
Mifepristone Plus One Set of Dilators110
Two Sets of Dilators201

[back to top]

Total Procedure Time

(NCT01615731)
Timeframe: Measured at clinic visits and on OR day, over a 3 day period

Interventionhours (Mean)
Two Sets of Dilators165
Mifepristone Plus One Set of Dilators86

[back to top]

Procedure Time

Measured as time from speculum insertion to removal (NCT01615731)
Timeframe: Intraoperative Time

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Two Sets of Dilators10.9
Mifepristone Plus One Set of Dilators11.8

[back to top]

Overall Patient Experience

Used a Visual Analogue Scale to determine the patient's overall satisfaction with her experience. The VAS ranges from 0-100. 0 being a worse than expected experience, 50 being what the patient expected and 100 being a better than expected experience. (NCT01615731)
Timeframe: Measured post operatively (at least 30 minutes, on average 1.5 hours) prior to discharge

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Two Sets of Dilators72
Mifepristone Plus One Set of Dilators79

[back to top]

Ease of Procedure by Blinded Surgeon

Used a Visual Analogue Scale to determine the ease of procedure by blinded surgeon. The VAS ranges from 0-100. 0 being the easiest procedure the surgeon felt they had every performed and 100 being the most difficult procedure imaginable by the surgeon. (NCT01615731)
Timeframe: Measured Immediately after procedure

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Two Sets of Dilators29
Mifepristone Plus One Set of Dilators30

[back to top]

Adverse Events (EBL)

One adverse event: Estimated Blood Loss (NCT01615731)
Timeframe: Intraoperatively

InterventionmL (Mean)
Two Sets of Dilators57
Mifepristone Plus One Set of Dilators63

[back to top]

Pain Perceived by Patient

Used a Visual Analogue Scale to determine the pain perceived by the patient pre-operatively (after misoprostol, immediately before transport to OR) and post-operatively (in recovery room, on average 1.5 hours post-operatively). The VAS ranges from 0-100. 0 being no pain felt by the patient and 100 being the worst pain imaginable felt by the patient. (NCT01615731)
Timeframe: Measured pre-operatively (after misoprostol, immediately before transport to OR) and post-operatively (in recovery room, on average 1.5 hours post-operatively)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Subject Pain Pre-OpSubject Pain Post-Op
Mifepristone Plus One Set of Dilators6316
Two Sets of Dilators133

[back to top]

Maternal Delivery Outcomes

Maternal delivery outcomes (NCT01634854)
Timeframe: Through discharge from hospital

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
EpiduralHemorrhageChorioamnionitisCesarean deliveryForceps delivery
Intravenous Oxytocin483074
Vaginal Misoprostol562224

[back to top]

Neonatal APGAR Scores

APGAR is a scoring system that evaluates Activity, Pulse, Grimace, Appearance, and Respiration. Each category is given a score of 0-2 points (with 0 being absent and 2 being normal), the points are then combined for a total score that ranges from 0-10. Scores 7 and above are generally normal, 4 to 6 are fairly low, and 2 and below are considered critically low. (NCT01634854)
Timeframe: At 1 minute and 5 minutes after delivery

,
Interventionnumber (Median)
APGAR 1 minuteAPGAR 5 minute
Intravenous Oxytocin89
Vaginal Misoprostol89

[back to top]

NICU Admission and APGAR Less Than 7 at 5 Minutes

NICU admission and APGAR less than 7 at 5 minutes (NCT01634854)
Timeframe: Through discharge from hospital

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
NICU AdmissionAPGAR less than 7 at 5 min
Intravenous Oxytocin40
Vaginal Misoprostol80

[back to top]

Time From Induction to Vaginal Delivery

Comparing the time to delivery in multiparas undergoing induction of labor with vaginal misoprostol or intravenous oxytocin. (NCT01634854)
Timeframe: Time to delivery in minutes from initiation of medication, up to 24 hours

Interventionminutes (Median)
Vaginal Misoprostol800
Intravenous Oxytocin693

[back to top]

Neonatal Weight at Delivery

Neonatal Weight (NCT01634854)
Timeframe: Immediately following delivery

Interventiongrams (Median)
Vaginal Misoprostol3500
Intravenous Oxytocin3415

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Excessive Uterine Activity Necessitating Treatment

Number of patients receiving terbutaline during labor for uterine tachysytole (NCT01634854)
Timeframe: Measured from initiation of medication until delivery time

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Vaginal Misoprostol9
Intravenous Oxytocin4

[back to top]

Initial Cervical Dilation at the Time of Surgical Abortion

Initial cervical dilation as measured in French units by a Pratt cervical dilator prior to surgical abortion. The dilation was measured in French units with each French unit being equivalent to 0.33 mm. (NCT01636063)
Timeframe: 24 to 48 hours after enrollment

InterventionFrench units (Mean)
Mifepristone30.8
Misoprostol31.1

[back to top]

Postpartum Hemorrhage

"Defined as:~Estimated blood loss ≥1000 mL after cesarean delivery. A substantial fall in the haematocrit e.g. 10% The requirement for a blood transfusion" (NCT01733329)
Timeframe: 24 HOURS

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Misoprostol6.6
Folic Acid20

[back to top]

Uterine Atony

"Uterine atony is defined as failure of the uterus to contract adequately following delivery. Recognition of a soft, boggy uterus in the setting of excessive postpartum bleeding can alert the attendant to atony and should trigger a series of interventions aimed at achieving tonic sustained uterine contraction." (NCT01733329)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Misoprostol8.3
Folic Acid25

[back to top]

Need for Additional Uterotonic Medications

The surgeon requested additional uterotonic agents on the basis of the clinical findings during surgery (e.g. uterine atony or blood loss of at least 1000 mL) Additional oxytocin was considered additional oxytocic intervention for purposes of data analysis. (NCT01733329)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Misoprostol10
Folic Acid40

[back to top]

Blood Loss

(NCT01733329)
Timeframe: 24 hours

InterventionmL (Median)
Misoprostol470
Folic Acid653.33

[back to top]

Physician Satisfaction With Cervical Preparation

Participants for whom the operating physician reported being satisfied or very satisfied with the cervical preparation. Assessed on Day of procedure. Assessed after completion of D&E procedure. (NCT01751087)
Timeframe: physicians' satisfaction with cervical prep was evaluated over course of procedure, an average of 6 minutes

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Osmotic Dilators + Placebo (Vit c) + Placebo (Vit B12)71
Osmotic Dilators + Placebo (Vit c) + Misoprostol78
Osmotic Dilators + Mifepristone + Placebo (Vit B12)85

[back to top]

Patient Satisfaction With Cervical Prep

Patients who were very satisfied or satisfied with cervical preparation. Assessed on Day of procedure. Assessed after completion of D&E procedure and just prior to discharge home. (NCT01751087)
Timeframe: patients' satisfaction with cervical prep was evaluated over course of cervical prep and procedure, up to 3 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Osmotic Dilators + Placebo (Vit c) + Placebo (Vit B12)72
Osmotic Dilators + Placebo (Vit c) + Misoprostol80
Osmotic Dilators + Mifepristone + Placebo (Vit B12)80

[back to top]

Operative Time

The duration of the D&E procedure was measured with a stopwatch, starting with the first instrument that passes into the uterus and ending when the last instrument is removed from the uterus upon completion of the D&E (NCT01751087)
Timeframe: participants were assessed for the duration of the procedure, an average of 6 minutes

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Osmotic Dilators + Placebo (Vit c) + Placebo (Vit B12)6.27
Osmotic Dilators + Placebo (Vit c) + Misoprostol6.28
Osmotic Dilators + Mifepristone + Placebo (Vit B12)5.53

[back to top]

Need for Mechanical Dilation

Assessed on Day of procedure. Assessed immediately after completion of D&E (NCT01751087)
Timeframe: participants were assessed for the duration of the procedure, an average of 6 minutes

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Osmotic Dilators + Placebo (Vit c) + Placebo (Vit B12)26
Osmotic Dilators + Placebo (Vit c) + Misoprostol9
Osmotic Dilators + Mifepristone + Placebo (Vit B12)16

[back to top]

Initial Cervical Dilation

Measured at the time of procedure (immediately before the start of D&E) (NCT01751087)
Timeframe: participants were assessed during cervical dilation process, average time of 1 minute

Interventioncentimeters (Mean)
Osmotic Dilators + Placebo (Vit c) + Placebo (Vit B12)2.2
Osmotic Dilators + Placebo (Vit c) + Misoprostol2.5
Osmotic Dilators + Mifepristone + Placebo (Vit B12)2.4

[back to top]

Ability to Complete the D&E on the First Attempt

Assessed on day of procedure and following day. If the procedure was unable to be completed as planned and the subject had to leave the procedure room and return for another attempt either at a time later the same day or the next day. (NCT01751087)
Timeframe: participants were assessed for the duration of the procedure, an average of 6 minutes

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Osmotic Dilators + Placebo (Vit c) + Placebo (Vit B12)98
Osmotic Dilators + Placebo (Vit c) + Misoprostol98
Osmotic Dilators + Mifepristone + Placebo (Vit B12)98

[back to top]

Chills (Any) After Day 2 Medication Administration

chills (any) after Day 2 medication administration (NCT01751087)
Timeframe: assessed immediately after administration of day 2 medication

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Osmotic Dilators + Placebo (Vit c) + Placebo (Vit B12)12
Osmotic Dilators + Placebo (Vit c) + Misoprostol39
Osmotic Dilators + Mifepristone + Placebo (Vit B12)18

[back to top]

Complications From Procedure

Patient having any complication, including hospitalizations transfusions additional unplanned procedures (NCT01751087)
Timeframe: assessed immediately after completion of D&E and at 1 week and 1 month post-procedure

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Osmotic Dilators + Placebo (Vit c) + Placebo (Vit B12)10
Osmotic Dilators + Placebo (Vit c) + Misoprostol2
Osmotic Dilators + Mifepristone + Placebo (Vit B12)2

[back to top]

Ease of Mechanical Dilation

Number of participants for whom, if additional mechanical dilation was required, it was difficult or very difficult. Assessed on day of procedure. Assessed after completion of D&E (NCT01751087)
Timeframe: participants were assessed for the duration of the procedure, an average of 6 minutes

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Osmotic Dilators + Placebo (Vit c) + Placebo (Vit B12)6
Osmotic Dilators + Placebo (Vit c) + Misoprostol4
Osmotic Dilators + Mifepristone + Placebo (Vit B12)1

[back to top]

Complications

Incidence of surgical complications related to D&E (NCT01818414)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Misoprostol0
Folic Acid2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Postoperative Satisfaction

Patient postoperative satisfaction with cervical preparation method (NCT01818414)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Misoprostol10
Folic Acid14

[back to top]

Number of Providers With Overall Satisfaction

Provider overall satisfaction with cervical preparation (NCT01818414)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionproviders (Number)
Misoprostol10
Folic Acid9

[back to top]

Operative Time

The primary outcome will be operative time. Operative time will be measured from initial passage of an instrument into the uterus to start the D&E. The end of operative time will be measured by the removal of the last instrument from the uterus to complete the D&E. (NCT01818414)
Timeframe: Day 1 of the study

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Misoprostol11.1
Folic Acid13.5

[back to top]

Patient Pain

"Change in pain from baseline to immediately preoperatively using a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (100-mm Visual Analogue Scale with 0 indicating no pain and 100 indicating worst pain in my life)" (NCT01818414)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionmm (Mean)
Misoprostol43.9
Folic Acid24.3

[back to top]

Adverse Events

Uterine perforation (NCT01862991)
Timeframe: Intraoperatively and 2 weeks post operatively

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dilapan-Placebo0
Dilapan-Mifepristone1
Mifepristone2

[back to top]

Procedure Time

Measured as time from speculum insertion to removal (NCT01862991)
Timeframe: Intraoperative Time, Collected immediately within procedure

Interventionminutes (Median)
Dilapan-Placebo13
Dilapan-Mifepristone12
Mifepristone18.5

[back to top]

Severe RDS

(NCT01916681)
Timeframe: enrollment through neonatal discharge

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Cervical Foley & Misoprostol0
Misoprostol Only1
Cervical Foley Alone2
Cervical Foley & Pitocin0

[back to top]

Time to Active Labor

(NCT01916681)
Timeframe: Start of induction to active labor

InterventionHours (Median)
Cervical Foley & Misoprostol7.4
Misoprostol Only13.3
Cervical Foley Alone11.0
Cervical Foley & Pitocin8.1

[back to top]

Time to Delivery

Amount of hours that pass between the start of the induction to delivery. (NCT01916681)
Timeframe: Hours between start of induction to delivery

InterventionHours (Median)
Cervical Foley & Misoprostol13.1
Misoprostol Only17.6
Cervical Foley Alone17.7
Cervical Foley & Pitocin14.5

[back to top]

Length of Stay

Total maternal length of stay as defined as days from the day the induction began to the day of discharge (NCT01916681)
Timeframe: Days between admit to hospital and discharge

InterventionDays (Median)
Cervical Foley & Misoprostol3
Misoprostol Only3
Cervical Foley Alone3
Cervical Foley & Pitocin3

[back to top]

Chorioamnionitis

(NCT01916681)
Timeframe: Enrollment through deischarge

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Cervical Foley & Misoprostol15
Misoprostol Only9
Cervical Foley Alone17
Cervical Foley & Pitocin20

[back to top]

Maternal Morbidity

(NCT01916681)
Timeframe: Enrollment through discharge

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Cervical Foley & Misoprostol5
Misoprostol Only8
Cervical Foley Alone13
Cervical Foley & Pitocin10

[back to top]

Mode of Delivery

Cesarean Delivery (NCT01916681)
Timeframe: Start of induction to delivery

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Cervical Foley & Misoprostol34
Misoprostol Only29
Cervical Foley Alone35
Cervical Foley & Pitocin38

[back to top]

Regional Anesthesia

(NCT01916681)
Timeframe: During delivery

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Cervical Foley & Misoprostol114
Misoprostol Only111
Cervical Foley Alone114
Cervical Foley & Pitocin121

[back to top]

Sense Wear Armband

Our secondary aim was to measure the change in physical activity between baseline and 8 weeks using the Sense Wear armband (SWA). The outcome measure was the average number of minutes spent daily performing physical activities >1.5 metabolic equivalents (METs).The SWA is a small device that collects information from multiple sensors: a triaxial accelerometer, heat flux, skin temperature, and galvanic signal. The information is integrated and processed by software using proprietary algorithms utilizing subjects' demographic characteristics (gender, age, height, and weight) to provide minute-by-minute estimates of physical activity. The SWA has shown good reliability and validity. The research participants in our study will wear the SWA for a week before and after they complete the treatment interventions. (NCT01943435)
Timeframe: Primary End-Point was 8 weeks ( 2 weeks after completion of 6-week intervention).

Interventionminutes per day (Mean)
Medical Care-23.1
Group Exercise4.3
Manual Therapy and Exercise-6.0

[back to top]

Swiss Spinal Stenosis (SSS) Questionnaire Score

Our primary aim included a primary outcome measure of self-reported pain/function, which was the change in SSS total score between baseline and 8 weeks. The Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire (SSS) is a validated 12-item condition-specific instrument for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. It provides a patient self-report measure of pain and physical function. Higher scores represent worse symptoms and less physical function. The 12-item SSS total score range is 12-55. For our analysis, we compared the change in the 12-item Total score from baseline to 8 weeks. (NCT01943435)
Timeframe: Primary End-Point was 8 weeks ( 2 weeks after completion of 6-week intervention).

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Medical Care-2.0
Group Exercise-1.7
Manual Therapy and Exercise-4.1

[back to top]

Self Paced Walking Test (SPWT)

Our primary aim also included a performance-based outcome measure, which was the distance walked during the SPWT. The analysis was a comparison of between-group changes in SPWT between baseline and 8 weeks. The Self-Paced Walking Test (SPWT) is a validated objective measure of a patient's walking capacity, which is performed on a level walking surface. The patient is instructed to walk at their own pace and to stop when the symptoms are troublesome enough that s/he needs to sit down to rest. The total time and total distance walked are measured by the research assistant. Our unit of measure was the total distance walked, expressed in meters. (NCT01943435)
Timeframe: Primary end-point was 8 weeks ( 2 weeks after 6 week intervention is completed).

Interventionmeters (Mean)
Medical Care130.5
Group Exercise219.2
Manual Therapy and Exercise267.8

[back to top]

Adverse Event Reported by Participants

(NCT02012491)
Timeframe: 30 Days

Interventionadverse events (Mean)
Misoprostol5.6
Misoprostol Plus Mifepristone6.1

[back to top]

Gestational Sac Expulsion by the Second Follow-up Visit at Day 8

(NCT02012491)
Timeframe: Day 8 (visit 3) and up to 30 day to ensure additional measures were not done (surgical)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Misoprostol111
Misoprostol Plus Mifepristone132

[back to top]

Gestational Sac Expulsion With One Treatment Dose on Day 3 (Visit 2) and no Need for Additional Medical or Surgical Intervention Within 30 Days of Treatment.

(NCT02012491)
Timeframe: Day 3 (visit 2) and up to 30 days following visit (to ensure surgical measures were not done

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Misoprostol100
Misoprostol Plus Mifepristone124

[back to top]

Uterine Asperation

Surgical removal of the miscarriage. (NCT02012491)
Timeframe: 30 Days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Misoprostol35
Misoprostol Plus Mifepristone13

[back to top]

Frequency of Serious Adverse Events Between Study Arms.

(NCT02012491)
Timeframe: 30 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Misoprostol3
Misoprostol Plus Mifepristone5

[back to top]

Gestational Sac Expulsion by the 30-day Telephone Call

(NCT02012491)
Timeframe: 30 Days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Misoprostol113
Misoprostol Plus Mifepristone135

[back to top]

Need for Extra Ecbolics (Oxytocin).

(NCT02083107)
Timeframe: from start of cesarean section till the end of operation (average one hour)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Sublingual Misoprostol & Rectal Placebo209
Rectal & Sublingual Placebo206
Rectal Misoprostol & Sublingual Placebo204

[back to top]

Incidence of Wound Sepsis

(NCT02083107)
Timeframe: upto one week

Interventionno. of cases experiencing wound sepsis (Number)
Sublingual Misoprostol & Rectal Placebo3
Rectal & Sublingual Placebo5
Rectal Misoprostol & Sublingual Placebo4

[back to top]

Incidence of Adverse Effects

(NCT02083107)
Timeframe: 24 hours

,,
Interventionno. of cases experiencing side effects (Number)
FeverChills
Rectal & Sublingual Placebo1111
Rectal Misoprostol & Sublingual Placebo2624
Sublingual Misoprostol & Rectal Placebo4442

[back to top]

APGAR Score

The Apgar score is the first test given to a newborn, it is referred to as an acronym for: Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, and Respiration. Scores obtainable are between 10 and 0, with 10 being the highest possible score. Pulse: above 100 beats per minute (2), below 100 beats per minute (1), absent (0). Respiration: Normal rate and effort, good cry (2), Slow or irregular,weak cry (1), absent (0). Grimace: Pulls away, sneezes, coughs, or cries with stimulation (2), Facial movement only (1), absent (0). Activity: Active, spontaneous movement (2), Arms and legs flexed with little movement (1), absent (0). Appearance: Normal color (2), Normal color (but hands and feet are bluish) (1), Bluish-gray or pale all over (0). (NCT02083107)
Timeframe: 1minute and 5 minutes from delivery of the fetus

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
APGAR 1 minuteAPGAR 5 minute
Rectal & Sublingual Placebo6.58.5
Rectal Misoprostol & Sublingual Placebo6.58.5
Sublingual Misoprostol & Rectal Placebo6.58.5

[back to top]

Time to Resume Bowel Habits

(NCT02083107)
Timeframe: average 24 hours

Interventionhours (Mean)
Sublingual Misoprostol & Rectal Placebo15.1
Rectal & Sublingual Placebo14.7
Rectal Misoprostol & Sublingual Placebo14.5

[back to top]

Need for Postoperative Blood Transfusion

(NCT02083107)
Timeframe: average 24 hours

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Sublingual Misoprostol & Rectal Placebo4
Rectal & Sublingual Placebo10
Rectal Misoprostol & Sublingual Placebo5

[back to top]

Need for Extra Analgesics

(NCT02083107)
Timeframe: average 24 hours

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Sublingual Misoprostol & Rectal Placebo56
Rectal & Sublingual Placebo62
Rectal Misoprostol & Sublingual Placebo50

[back to top]

Intraoperative Blood Loss

(NCT02083107)
Timeframe: from start of cesarean section till the end of operation (average one hour)

Interventionmillilitres (Mean)
Sublingual Misoprostol & Rectal Placebo357.8
Rectal & Sublingual Placebo641.7
Rectal Misoprostol & Sublingual Placebo457.5

[back to top]

Change in Hematocrite Value

(NCT02083107)
Timeframe: 24 hours postoperative from baseline hematocrite value

InterventionPercentage Hematocrit (Mean)
Sublingual Misoprostol & Rectal Placebo-0.1
Rectal & Sublingual Placebo-1.6
Rectal Misoprostol & Sublingual Placebo-0.1

[back to top]

Change in Hemoglobin Concentration

(NCT02083107)
Timeframe: 24 hours postoperative from baseline hemoglobin

Interventiongram/dL (Mean)
Sublingual Misoprostol & Rectal Placebo-0.3
Rectal & Sublingual Placebo-0.9
Rectal Misoprostol & Sublingual Placebo-0.4

[back to top]

Patient Enrollment

The percentage of women who are offered enrollment and accept. (NCT02141555)
Timeframe: One year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Vaginal Misoprostol2
Buccal Misoprostol2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Complete Abortion

Number of participants with complete abortion without surgical intervention defined as no evidence of a gestational sac on transvaginal ultrasound at the follow up visit. (NCT02141555)
Timeframe: one week

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Vaginal Misoprostol1
Buccal Misoprostol2

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Answered 1 or 2 on a Scale of Satisfaction With the Procedure

"Written surveys patients will fill out at follow up visit assessing patient's satisfaction with the procedure.~How satisfied were you with your procedure?~The satisfaction scale used was:~1 =Very Satisfied, comfortable, likely to recommend 3= Neutral 5= Very unsatisfied/uncomfortable, unlike to recommend" (NCT02141555)
Timeframe: one week

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Vaginal Misoprostol2
Buccal Misoprostol2

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting 2 or 3 on a Scale of Medication Side Effects

"Assessment of medication side effects including: nausea, vomiting, headache, fever (over 100.4 F), dizziness, diarrhea, bad taste, dry mouth Did you experience any of these side effects? If so, how long did they last?~Patients asked on a scale of 0 to 3, where:~Side Effect scale:~0 = never~1= less than one day 2 = 1 to 2 days 3 = more than 2 days" (NCT02141555)
Timeframe: one week

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Vaginal Misoprostol0
Buccal Misoprostol0

[back to top]

Rate of Cesarean Section

Mode of delivery via cesarean section or vaginal delivery (NCT02314728)
Timeframe: within 48 hours

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Cesarean DeliveryVaginal Delivery
Oxytocin Alone2686
Vaginal Misoprostol2789

[back to top]

Maternal and Neonatal Infectious Morbidity

"Maternal infection defined as fever >100.4 on at least two occasions during labor, continued antibiotic treatment on or after PPD#1, histologic confirmation of chorioamnionitis. Dose of Oxytocin, Tachysystole, Estimated blood loss at delivery, maternal length of stay, Epidural use, Indication for cesarean delivery~Neonatal infection defined as WBC <5000 and absolute neutrophil count <1000 or positive blood cultures and neonatal fever, NICU admission, Apgar score less than 7 at 5 minutes," (NCT02314728)
Timeframe: within 72 hours

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
NICU AdmissionHistologic Chorioamnionitis
Oxytocin Alone1513
Vaginal Misoprostol139

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Had Uterine Hyperstimulation

Presence of uterine hyperstimulation, tachysystole as defined as 6 uterine contractions in a 10 minute period (NCT02408315)
Timeframe: from study entry until delivery- anticipated 3 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Buccal Misoprostol/Vaginal Placebo18
Vaginal Misoprostol/Buccal Placebo22

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Neonatal Cord Gases Measured

cord gases from newborn (NCT02408315)
Timeframe: from study entry until delivery- anticipated 3 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Buccal Misoprostol/Vaginal Placebo12
Vaginal Misoprostol/Buccal Placebo15

[back to top]

Uterine Rupture

Presence of uterine rupture (NCT02408315)
Timeframe: from study entry until delivery- anticipated 3 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Buccal Misoprostol/Vaginal Placebo0
Vaginal Misoprostol/Buccal Placebo0

[back to top]

Number of Vaginal Deliveries That Occurred Within 24 Hours

rate of achieving vaginal delivery within 24 hours (NCT02408315)
Timeframe: from study entry until delivery- anticipated 3 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Buccal Misoprostol/Vaginal Placebo58
Vaginal Misoprostol/Buccal Placebo89

[back to top]

Time to Delivery

"number of hours from placement of study drug to delivery~Cesarean delivery for fetal non--reassurance indication" (NCT02408315)
Timeframe: from study entry until delivery- anticipated 3 days

Interventionhours (Median)
Buccal Misoprostol/Vaginal Placebo28.1
Vaginal Misoprostol/Buccal Placebo20.1

[back to top]

Dose of Oxytocin Used for Augmentation

dose of oxytocin used for augmentation of labor (NCT02408315)
Timeframe: from study entry until delivery- anticipated 3 days

Interventionmilliunits per minute (Median)
Buccal Misoprostol/Vaginal Placebo6
Vaginal Misoprostol/Buccal Placebo4

[back to top]

Number of Doses Misoprostol Used

Number of doses of misoprostol needed (NCT02408315)
Timeframe: from study entry until delivery- anticipated 3 days

Interventiondoses (Median)
Buccal Misoprostol/Vaginal Placebo3
Vaginal Misoprostol/Buccal Placebo2

[back to top]

Number of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Admission

Admission to NICU (NCT02408315)
Timeframe: from study entry until discharge of newborn- anticipated up to 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Buccal Misoprostol/Vaginal Placebo30
Vaginal Misoprostol/Buccal Placebo31

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Cesarean Deliveries Based on Fetal Non-Reassurance Indications

Rate of cesarean deliveries performed for fetal non-reassurance as the indication (NCT02408315)
Timeframe: from study entry until delivery- anticipated 3 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Buccal Misoprostol/Vaginal Placebo14
Vaginal Misoprostol/Buccal Placebo5

[back to top]

Change in Hemoglobin

(NCT02411916)
Timeframe: 1 day after delivery

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Intervention Cases1.08
Controls1.20

[back to top]

Initial Cervical Dilation

Initial cervical dilation as measured by Hegar Dilator accepted with least resistance (NCT02412618)
Timeframe: Assessed 4-6 hour following medications at time of D&E procedure

Interventionmm (Mean)
Mifepristone11.7
Placebo10.9

[back to top]

Patient Acceptability and Assessment of Pain and Side Effects (5-point Likert Scale)

"5-point Likert scale given to patients following procedure once recovered from anesthesia assessing pain, side effects including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, cramping, and if they would choose the method again or recommend to friends.~Likert scale: Strongly agree (5), Agree (4), Neutral (3), Disagree (2), Strongly Disagree (1)" (NCT02412618)
Timeframe: intraoperative

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
NauseaSevere Cramps
Mifepristone44
Placebo44

[back to top]

Dilation Time in Minutes

Time from beginning of cervical dilation to completion of cervical dilation. (NCT02534883)
Timeframe: At time of procedure.

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Group 11.9
Group 21.4

[back to top]

Resistance Score

"Ease of Dilation Per Surgeon on a numeric scale of 1(easier than normal) to 5 (more difficult than normal) with 3 being normal." (NCT02534883)
Timeframe: At time of procedure.

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Group 12.9
Group 22.7

[back to top]

Efficacy (Cervical Ripening)

To evaluate the efficacy of two doses of 200ug of misoprostol (for a total of 400ug), administered vaginally, on cervical ripening before diagnostic and operative hysteroscopic procedures in postmenopausal women (amenorrhea greater than 1 year). Efficacy is represented by time to dilation. (NCT02534883)
Timeframe: At time of surgery/cervical dilation

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Group 11.9
Group 21.4

[back to top]

Maximum Dilator Size

The largest cervical dilator that could be passed through the internal cervical os. (NCT02534883)
Timeframe: At time of procedure.

Interventionmillimeters (Mean)
Group 110.3
Group 26

[back to top]

Number of Recorded Side Effects.

Secondary aim: to evaluate if cervical ripening with misoprostol reduces side effects (NCT02534883)
Timeframe: At time of surgery/cervical dilation

Interventionnumber of side effects out of seven (Mean)
Group 10.6
Group 20.6

[back to top]

Number of Complications

Count of complications at time of surgery. (NCT02534883)
Timeframe: At time of procedure.

Interventioncomplications (Mean)
Group 10.1
Group 20

[back to top]

Number of Infants Per Gender

Gender defined as male or female. (NCT02546193)
Timeframe: Neonatal discharge from the hospital, approximately 2-3 days after delivery

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
FemaleMale
Inpatient Usual Care22
Outpatient Foley Catheter13

[back to top]

Pre-delivery Hospitalization Time

The time from when the patient is admitted to the hospital until she delivers her infant and placenta will be recorded. For the outpatient group, this will be measured by adding together the time that the patient spends in the Family Birth Center during Foley placement in the evening with the time she spends inpatient the next day during the rest of her induction until delivery. (NCT02546193)
Timeframe: Delivery, approximately 16 to 30 hours after admission

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Outpatient Foley Catheter1197
Inpatient Usual Care1398

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Postpartum Complications

Postpartum complications defined as postpartum hemorrhage, depression, urinary tract infection, wound infection, endomyometritis, mastitis, pyelonephritis, intra-abdominal infection, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary thrombosis, cardiac complication, or fever of unknown origin. (NCT02546193)
Timeframe: Final postpartum visit, approximately 42 days after delivery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Outpatient Foley Catheter1
Inpatient Usual Care0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Normal Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery

(NCT02546193)
Timeframe: End of the third stage of labor, approximately 16 hours after admission

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Outpatient Foley Catheter3
Inpatient Usual Care3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Intrapartum Complications

Intrapartum complications defined as intrapartum fever, placental abruption, or chorioamnionitis. (NCT02546193)
Timeframe: Final postpartum visit, approximately 42 days after delivery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Outpatient Foley Catheter0
Inpatient Usual Care0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Per Method of Induction Used

Method of induction: outpatient placement of Foley catheter vs. inpatient usual care induction (medication and/or Foley catheter at time of admission) (NCT02546193)
Timeframe: End of the third stage of labor, approximately 16 hours after admission

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Outpatient Foley Catheter4
Inpatient Usual Care4

[back to top]

Mean Umbilical Cord Blood Gases

Mean infant venous pH reported from complete umbilical cord blood gases. (NCT02546193)
Timeframe: Neonatal discharge from the hospital, approximately 2-3 days after delivery

InterventionpH (Mean)
Outpatient Foley Catheter7.35
Inpatient Usual Care7.32

[back to top]

Mean Time of Delivery

Time from admission to the hospital to delivery of the placenta. (NCT02546193)
Timeframe: End of the third stage of labor, approximately 16 to 30 hours after admission

Interventionhours (Mean)
Outpatient Foley Catheter19.94
Inpatient Usual Care23.29

[back to top]

Mean Score on Maternal Satisfaction Survey

This survey will gauge the mother's experience during her induction with regard to pain, rest, concerns during the induction, satisfaction, and willingness to recommend their particular induction setting (inpatient vs. outpatient). Questions are based on a 1-4 scale, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction. (NCT02546193)
Timeframe: Discharge from the hospital, approximately 2-3 days after delivery

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Outpatient Foley Catheter3.25
Inpatient Usual Care3

[back to top]

Mean Readmission Rate

Defined as readmission to the hospital for any reason within 6 weeks from the date of delivery. (NCT02546193)
Timeframe: Final postpartum visit, approximately 42 days after delivery

Interventionreadmissions (Mean)
Outpatient Foley Catheter0
Inpatient Usual Care0

[back to top]

Mean Estimated Blood Loss at Delivery

Estimated total blood loss at time of delivery in milliliters. (NCT02546193)
Timeframe: End of the third stage of labor, approximately 16 hours after admission

Interventionmilliters (Mean)
Outpatient Foley Catheter500
Inpatient Usual Care562.5

[back to top]

Mean Dose of Medication for Pain Relief

Mean dose of opioid pain medication (Fentanyl) in micrograms (NCT02546193)
Timeframe: End of the third stage of labor, approximately 16 hours after admission

Interventionmicrograms (Mean)
Outpatient Foley Catheter160
Inpatient Usual Care322

[back to top]

Mean Birth Weight

Mean infant birth weight reported in grams. (NCT02546193)
Timeframe: Neonatal discharge from the hospital, approximately 2-3 days after delivery

Interventiongrams (Mean)
Outpatient Foley Catheter3602.5
Inpatient Usual Care3635

[back to top]

Mean APGAR Scores

APGAR (Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, Respiration) Scoring System. 1-10 scale with higher total score indicating better newborn health. Infant mean APGAR score at 5 minutes reported. (NCT02546193)
Timeframe: Neonatal discharge from the hospital, approximately 2-3 days after delivery

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Outpatient Foley Catheter9
Inpatient Usual Care9

[back to top]

Number of Infants With Neonatal Morbidity or Mortality, Categorized by Reason.

Any diagnosed neonatal morbid condition or mortality prior to hospital discharge. (NCT02546193)
Timeframe: Neonatal discharge from the hospital, approximately 2-3 days after delivery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Outpatient Foley Catheter0
Inpatient Usual Care0

[back to top]

The Time From Active Phase to Delivery

(NCT02566005)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionhours (Mean)
Misoprostol Group3.11
Misoprostol and Foley Bulb Group3.76

[back to top]

The Time From Induction Until to Active Phase Labor

(NCT02566005)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionhours (Mean)
Misoprostol Group17.43
Misoprostol and Foley Bulb Group12.81

[back to top]

The Time Interval From Induction to Delivery: All Participants

During labor from the start of the induction to the delivery (NCT02566005)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionhours (Mean)
Misoprostol Group20.97
Misoprostol and Foley Bulb Group16.27

[back to top]

Time (Hours) From Induction to Delivery: Multiparous

(NCT02566005)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionhours (Mean)
Misoprostol Group15.99
Misoprostol and Foley Bulb Group11.89

[back to top]

Time (Hours) From Induction to Delivery: Nulliparous

(NCT02566005)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionhours (Mean)
Misoprostol Group22.7
Misoprostol and Foley Bulb Group18.15

[back to top]

Time From Induction to Delivery: CD

Time (hours) from induction to delivery: Cesarean Delivery (CD) (NCT02566005)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionhours (Mean)
Misoprostol Group24.38
Misoprostol and Foley Bulb Group17.95

[back to top]

Time From Induction to Delivery: VD

Time (hours) from induction to delivery: Vaginal Delivery (VD) (NCT02566005)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionhours (Mean)
Misoprostol Group18.87
Misoprostol and Foley Bulb Group15.55

[back to top]

Estimated Blood Loss

(NCT02566005)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionml (Mean)
Misoprostol Group493.3
Misoprostol and Foley Bulb Group490.5

[back to top]

Incidence of Chorioamnionitis

(NCT02566005)
Timeframe: Day 1

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Misoprostol Group8
Misoprostol and Foley Bulb Group4

[back to top]

Incidence of Uterine Tachysystole

(NCT02566005)
Timeframe: Day 1

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Misoprostol Group12
Misoprostol and Foley Bulb Group6

[back to top]

Per Treatment Protocol: Time (Hours) From Induction to Delivery

(NCT02566005)
Timeframe: day 1

Interventionhours (Mean)
Misoprostol Group20.5109
Misoprostol and Foley Bulb Group16.6814

[back to top]

Number of Newborns With Transient Tachypnea (TTN)

(NCT02639429)
Timeframe: From delivery to neonatal discharge (approximately 2 to 7 days)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Approach: Foley Balloon + Vaginal Misoprostol5
Single Approach: Vaginal Misoprostol Only5

[back to top]

Induction-to-delivery Interval in Hours

(NCT02639429)
Timeframe: Induction to delivery

Interventionhours (Mean)
Combined Approach: Foley Balloon + Vaginal Misoprostol24.8
Single Approach: Vaginal Misoprostol Only24.5

[back to top]

Number of Newborns Admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU)

(NCT02639429)
Timeframe: From delivery to neonatal discharge (approximately 2 to 7 days)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Approach: Foley Balloon + Vaginal Misoprostol24
Single Approach: Vaginal Misoprostol Only20

[back to top]

Number of Newborns With Culture-proven Sepsis

(NCT02639429)
Timeframe: From delivery to neonatal discharge (approximately 2 to 7 days)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Approach: Foley Balloon + Vaginal Misoprostol0
Single Approach: Vaginal Misoprostol Only1

[back to top]

Number of Newborns With Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS)

(NCT02639429)
Timeframe: From delivery to neonatal discharge (approximately 2 to 7 days)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Approach: Foley Balloon + Vaginal Misoprostol5
Single Approach: Vaginal Misoprostol Only4

[back to top]

Number of Newborns With Seizures

(NCT02639429)
Timeframe: From delivery to neonatal discharge (approximately 2 to 7 days)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Approach: Foley Balloon + Vaginal Misoprostol0
Single Approach: Vaginal Misoprostol Only0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Need for Oxytocin Augmentation

(NCT02639429)
Timeframe: Induction to delivery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Approach: Foley Balloon + Vaginal Misoprostol89
Single Approach: Vaginal Misoprostol Only103

[back to top]

Number of Participants Exhibiting Tachysystole Resulting in Fetal Heart Rate Abnormalities

Uterine tachysystole is a condition of excessively frequent uterine contractions during pregnancy. Tachysystole is indicated ≥ 5 contractions in a 10 minute period averaged over a 30-minute window. (NCT02639429)
Timeframe: Induction to delivery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Approach: Foley Balloon + Vaginal Misoprostol10
Single Approach: Vaginal Misoprostol Only20

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Need for Cesarean Delivery

(NCT02639429)
Timeframe: Induction to delivery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Approach: Foley Balloon + Vaginal Misoprostol51
Single Approach: Vaginal Misoprostol Only53

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Need for Operative Vaginal Delivery

(NCT02639429)
Timeframe: Induction to delivery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Approach: Foley Balloon + Vaginal Misoprostol5
Single Approach: Vaginal Misoprostol Only6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinical Chorioamnionitis

Clinical chorioamnionitis is indicated by maternal fever ≥ 100.4 Fahrenheit, uterine fundal tenderness, maternal or fetal tachycardia (>100/min and >160/min, respectively), and purulent or foul amniotic fluid. (NCT02639429)
Timeframe: Induction to delivery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Approach: Foley Balloon + Vaginal Misoprostol1
Single Approach: Vaginal Misoprostol Only1

[back to top]

Composite Maternal Morbidity as Indicated by the Number of Participants With Measures of Maternal Morbidity

"Measures of maternal morbidity assessed:~Maternal ICU admission~Postpartum endometritis~Surgical-site infections prior to discharge~Venous thromboembolism~Need for transfusion~Maternal death" (NCT02639429)
Timeframe: Induction to discharge (approximately 5 days)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Maternal ICU AdmissionPostpartum endometritisSurgical site infection
Combined Approach: Foley Balloon + Vaginal Misoprostol035
Single Approach: Vaginal Misoprostol Only301

[back to top]

Composite Neonatal Morbidity as Indicated by the Number of Newborns With Measures of Neonatal Morbidity

"Measures of neonatal morbidity assessed:~Apgar score ≤ 7 at 5 mins~Umbilical cord potential of hydrogen (pH) < 7.1~Neonatal injury: brachial plexus injury, fracture~Perinatal death" (NCT02639429)
Timeframe: From delivery to neonatal discharge (approximately 2 to 7 days)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutescord pH < 7.1any neonatal injury
Combined Approach: Foley Balloon + Vaginal Misoprostol453
Single Approach: Vaginal Misoprostol Only353

[back to top]

To Determine the Interval From Initiation of Misoprostol to Delivery in Each Group

To determine the interval from initiation of misoprostol to delivery in each group (NCT02680314)
Timeframe: within 24 hours from the initial intervention

InterventionMedian number of Minutes (Median)
Single Dose1187
Multiple Dose1321

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Vaginal Delivery Within 24 Hours

To compare the rate of vaginal delivery within 24 hours in patients who receive a single dose of misoprostol versus those receiving multiple doses of this medication. (NCT02680314)
Timeframe: within 24 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Single Dose50
Multiple Dose55

[back to top]

Rate of Anti-emetic Use

Use of medication to treat nausea. (NCT02777190)
Timeframe: from enrollment until delivery, up to 3 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Oral Misoprostol7
Vaginal Misoprostol1

[back to top]

Rate of Chorioamnionitis

Chorioamnionitis is defined as an intraamniotic infection. (NCT02777190)
Timeframe: from enrollment until delivery, up to 3 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Oral Misoprostol0
Vaginal Misoprostol0

[back to top]

Time to Initiation of Oxytocin for Labor Augmentation

The length of time (in hours) between the administration of misoprostol (first dose) and the first administration of oxytocin for labor augmentation. (NCT02777190)
Timeframe: From start of induction of labor (first misoprostol administration) to initiation of oxytocin for labor augmentation, up to 36 hours

Interventionhours (Mean)
Oral Misoprostol11.0
Vaginal Misoprostol12.6

[back to top]

Neonatal Morbidity

binary composite outcome defined as Apgar score < 7, or cord blood gas pH of less than 7 or base deficit great than 12, or neonatal intensive care unit admission within 4 hours of delivery. (NCT02777190)
Timeframe: 4 hours from delivery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Oral Misoprostol2
Vaginal Misoprostol3

[back to top]

Rate of Abandoning Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Switching to Mechanical Dilation for Cervical Ripening

Based on clinician's judgment on the progress of the induction, the rate that misoprostol administration was stopped and a cervical ripening balloon was used instead (NCT02777190)
Timeframe: from enrollment until delivery, up to 3 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Oral Misoprostol2
Vaginal Misoprostol7

[back to top]

Cesarean Section Rate

Number of cesarean sections/total deliveries (%) (NCT02777190)
Timeframe: From enrollment until delivery, up to 3 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Oral Misoprostol2
Vaginal Misoprostol7

[back to top]

Time to Active Labor

Active phase of labor defined as greater than or equal to 6 cm cervical dilation (NCT02777190)
Timeframe: from start of induction of labor (first misoprostol administration) to active phase of labor, up to 3 days.

Interventionhours (Mean)
Oral Misoprostol19.8
Vaginal Misoprostol21.4

[back to top]

Time to Vaginal Delivery

includes vaginal deliveries only; cesarean section deliveries are excluded (NCT02777190)
Timeframe: from start of induction of labor (first misoprostol administration) to vaginal delivery, up to 3 days

Interventionhours (Mean)
Oral Misoprostol22.3
Vaginal Misoprostol23.2

[back to top]

Rate of Vaginal Delivery Within 24 Hours

Vaginal delivery within from start of induction with misoprostol. (NCT02777190)
Timeframe: 24 hours from start of induction of labor (first misoprostol administration)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Oral Misoprostol10
Vaginal Misoprostol6

[back to top]

Rate of Tachysystole Causing Non-reassuring Fetal Heart Tones

"Previously defined as hyperstimulation, this outcome measure is defined as 4 or more contractions in a 10 minute period (tachysystole) thought to be causing recurrent variable or late decelerations, bradycardia, or minimal variability in the fetal heart rate tracing (non-reassuring fetal heart tones,which would require intervention to resolve or delivery of the infant)." (NCT02777190)
Timeframe: From enrollment until delivery, up to 3 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Oral Misoprostol1
Vaginal Misoprostol2

[back to top]

Rate of Tachysystole

Tachysystole is defined as 4 or more contractions in a 10 minute period. (NCT02777190)
Timeframe: from enrollment until delivery, up to 3 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Oral Misoprostol1
Vaginal Misoprostol4

[back to top]

Rate of Need for Tocolysis

Tocolysis is the administration of medication to decrease or stop contractions. (NCT02777190)
Timeframe: from enrollment until delivery, up to 3 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Oral Misoprostol1
Vaginal Misoprostol2

[back to top]

Rate of Meconium Stained Fluid

Amniotic fluid with visible meconium (from fetal defecation) within it. (NCT02777190)
Timeframe: from enrollment until delivery, up to 3 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Oral Misoprostol2
Vaginal Misoprostol4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Presence of a Uterine Cervical Canal With ≥8 mm of Dilation

This outcome measures how many mm of dilation the cervical canal has before the procedure. Cervical permeability (≥8 mm of dilation, used as a cut-off) was measured using Karman cannulas, from higher to low diameter. (NCT02957305)
Timeframe: Baseline before Manual Vacuum Aspiration procedure

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Inadequate (<8 mm)Adequate (≥8 mm)
Misoprostol 200 µg5055
Misoprostol 400 µg3076

[back to top]

Pain Score (VAS)

Pain scores were assessed using a verbal analog scale (VAS), ranging from zero (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) (NCT02957305)
Timeframe: before Manual Vacuum Aspiration

Interventionunits on a scale - Verbal Analog Scale (Median)
Misoprostol 400 µg0
Misoprostol 200 µg0

[back to top]

Cervical Dilation

Pratt Dilator initially accepted without resistance starting from 65 and working down (NCT03134183)
Timeframe: At end of procedure

Intervention"French circumference in millimeters" (Mean)
Vaginal Misoprostol49.6
Buccal Misoprostol46.2

[back to top]

Procedure Time

Time from initial uterine instrumentation to speculum out (NCT03134183)
Timeframe: At end of procedure

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Vaginal Misoprostol9.5
Buccal Misoprostol9.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants Administered Neonatal Antibiotics and/or Neonatal Blood Cultures

Administration of neonatal antibiotics and/or neonatal blood cultures (NCT03407625)
Timeframe: From time of birth until the time of discharge or up to 7 days of life, whichever comes first.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol277
Oral Misoprostol237

[back to top]

Number of Participants That Needed Mechanical Ventilation in Delivery Room (Yes/No)

Intubation with mechanical support or control of neonatal breathing in delivery room (NCT03407625)
Timeframe: at delivery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol2
Oral Misoprostol4

[back to top]

Number of Participants Used General Anesthesia for Delivery

General anesthesia administered for delivery (NCT03407625)
Timeframe: at delivery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol29
Oral Misoprostol24

[back to top]

Number of Participants With an 5-minute Apgar Score Less Than 4

Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, Respirations - scored from 0 to 2 for each component, added to make a total score and used as an assessment of initial response to newborn resuscitation, lower scores associated with poor outcomes. Here defined as Apgar less than 4 at 5 minutes. (NCT03407625)
Timeframe: 5 minutes after time of birth

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol4
Oral Misoprostol4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Blood Transfusion

administration of blood products related to delivery blood loss (NCT03407625)
Timeframe: at delivery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol37
Oral Misoprostol33

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Excess Blood Loss

Maternal excess blood loss is defined as >500ml for vaginal and >1000ml for cesarean delivery (NCT03407625)
Timeframe: at delivery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol215
Oral Misoprostol223

[back to top]

Time With Foley Bulb in Place

time (in hours) from insertion to removal or expulsion of foley bulb (NCT03407625)
Timeframe: From time of documented insertion until the time of documented expulsion or removal, whichever came first, assessed up to 24 hours.

Interventionhours (Median)
Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol5.3

[back to top]

Time to Delivery

Time (in hours) from start of induction agent to delivery at first induction (NCT03407625)
Timeframe: from start of induction agent to time of delivery

Interventionhours (Mean)
Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol17.3
Oral Misoprostol18.2

[back to top]

Presence of Chorioamnionitis

Intrapartum fever (temp equal or greater than 38C) with no other identified cause (NCT03407625)
Timeframe: at delivery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol203
Oral Misoprostol155

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Vaginal Delivery

vaginal delivery at first induction (NCT03407625)
Timeframe: at delivery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol869
Oral Misoprostol860

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Uterine Rupture

spontaneous separation of myometrium in a previously intact, unscarred uterus (NCT03407625)
Timeframe: at delivery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol0
Oral Misoprostol1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Unplanned Hysterectomy

unplanned removal of the uterus following delivery of the fetus (NCT03407625)
Timeframe: at discharge from the hospital following delivery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol1
Oral Misoprostol0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Umbilical Cord Blood pH <7.0

Arterial or venous cord blood pH defined as <7.0 (NCT03407625)
Timeframe: at delivery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol3
Oral Misoprostol4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Uterine Hyperstimulation Syndrome

Tachysystole accompanied by fetal heart rate decelerations (NCT03407625)
Timeframe: at delivery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol184
Oral Misoprostol147

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Neonatal Sepsis

Neonatal bacteremia as defined by bacterial growth in blood cultures (NCT03407625)
Timeframe: From time of birth until the time of discharge or up to 7 days of life, whichever comes first.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol2
Oral Misoprostol1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With NICU Admission Order

Admission order to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) placed between the time of delivery and infant discharge (NCT03407625)
Timeframe: From time of birth until the time of discharge or up to 7 days of life, whichever comes first.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol16
Oral Misoprostol17

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Postpartum Fever

Fever recorded in the time after delivery but prior to discharge from the hospital, with clinical assessment of endometritis (NCT03407625)
Timeframe: Following delivery and prior to discharge

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol11
Oral Misoprostol3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Tachysystole

6 or more contractions in 10 minutes or tetanic contraction of 120 seconds or longer (NCT03407625)
Timeframe: at delivery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol325
Oral Misoprostol313

[back to top]

Number of Participants Used Neuraxial Analgesia During Labor

Regional or neuraxial analgesia (labor epidural or spinal) used between the start of induction and delivery (NCT03407625)
Timeframe: from start of induction to delivery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol949
Oral Misoprostol935

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Meconium-stained Amniotic Fluid

Identification of any meconium (green tinge) in the amniotic fluid before or during delivery by a healthcare provider's assessment of gross fluid color. (NCT03407625)
Timeframe: At the time of rupture of membranes and at delivery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol227
Oral Misoprostol234

[back to top]

Number of Recurrences During the Follow-up Period

Number of recurrences during the follow-up period (for those who have a first recurrence during the follow-up time period) (NCT03617172)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionnumber of events (Number)
Study Drug (Misoprostol)0
Placebo0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinical Recurrence of Clostridium Difficile Infection (CDI).

Number of Participants with clinical recurrence of Clostridium Difficile Infection (CDI) in the 8 week follow-up period. (NCT03617172)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Study Drug (Misoprostol)0
Placebo0

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants Adherent to Study Protocol

Measured as number of participants self reporting adherence to study intervention of ulipristal acetate followed by misoprostol taken 6-18 hours later divided by number of participants enrolled in study. (NCT05216952)
Timeframe: From admission until day 3 follow up, +/- 1 day

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ulipristal Acetate (UPA) 90 mg100

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants Recruited to Study Protocol

Measured as number of participants enrolled in study divided by number of patients screened for participation in study (NCT05216952)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ulipristal Acetate (UPA) 90 mg37.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Resolution of Early Pregnancy Loss Following Study Intervention

Absence of gestational sac on transvaginal ultrasound examination on day 3 follow up (NCT05216952)
Timeframe: From admission until day 3 follow up, +/- 1 day

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ulipristal Acetate (UPA) 90 mg3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Retained in Study Protocol

Measured as number of participants attending all required study visits (day 0, day 3, day 8, and day 30) divided by number of participants enrolled in study (NCT05216952)
Timeframe: From admission until day 30 follow up, +/- 7 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ulipristal Acetate (UPA) 90 mg100

[back to top]

Number of Participants Needing Additional Medication for Resolution of Early Pregnancy Loss

Participant reported need for additional dose of misoprostol for resolution of early pregnancy loss. (NCT05216952)
Timeframe: From admission until day 30 follow up, +/- 7 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ulipristal Acetate (UPA) 90 mg0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Needing Surgical Management for Resolution of Early Pregnancy Loss

Participant reported need for vacuum aspiration for resolution of early pregnancy loss. (NCT05216952)
Timeframe: From admission until day 30 follow up, +/- 7 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ulipristal Acetate (UPA) 90 mg0

[back to top]

Median Acceptability of Study Intervention

Participant reported ordinal data based on 4 Likert scale questions about acceptability of study intervention with scores ranging from 1-5 (1=Very Unlikely, 2=More Unlikely, 3=Neutral, 4=More Likely, 5=Very Likely). Higher scores indicated more acceptable treatment. (NCT05216952)
Timeframe: From admission until day 30 follow up, +/- 7 days

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Would you use these medications again if you had another miscarriage?Would you recommend these medications to a friend with a miscarriage?If possible to take Ulipristal Acetate (UPA) at home, would you be more or less likely to use again?If possible to take UPA at a different time, would you be more or less likely to use again?
Ulipristal Acetate (UPA) 90 mg3443

[back to top]