Page last updated: 2024-11-05

2-aminopurine

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

2-aminopurine is a synthetic adenine analog that can act as a base pair analog in DNA. It is commonly used as a fluorescent probe in molecular biology research because it exhibits unique spectral properties when incorporated into DNA. 2-aminopurine can be synthesized through various methods, including the reaction of 2-chloropurine with ammonia. It has been shown to exhibit mutagenic effects, primarily due to its ability to form base pairs with both adenine and guanine. This property makes it useful for studying DNA replication and repair mechanisms. The fluorescence properties of 2-aminopurine are sensitive to its environment, allowing researchers to investigate conformational changes, protein-DNA interactions, and DNA dynamics. Its ability to mimic adenine makes it a valuable tool for studying the structure and function of DNA and related processes.'

2-Aminopurine: A purine that is an isomer of ADENINE (6-aminopurine). [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

aminopurine : Any purine having at least one amino substituent. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

2-aminopurine : The parent compound of the 2-aminopurines, comprising a purine core carrying an amino substituent at the 2-position. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID9955
CHEMBL ID388594
CHEBI ID479072
SCHEMBL ID5631
MeSH IDM0023189

Synonyms (62)

Synonym
AC-13347
SDCCGMLS-0065821.P001
nsc-24129
purine, 2-amino-
nsc 24129
ccris 759
einecs 207-197-4
BIOMOLKI2_000050
MLS001333096
MLS001333095
smr000857109
1h-purin-2-amine
nsc24129
7h-purin-2-amine
sq 22,451
2-aminopurine
sq 22451
452-06-2
2-aminopurine, >=99%
BIOMOLKI_000044
NCGC00163382-01
9h-purin-2-amine
2bp ,
CHEMBL388594 ,
BMK1-E8
9h-purin-2-ylamine
bdbm50208875
2'-amino-purine
2-amino purine
chebi:479072 ,
aminopurine
AKOS006220998
HMS2230L13
AKOS015961157
CCG-100648
unii-o14b3u97fw
o14b3u97fw ,
isoadenine
191236-69-8
FT-0611268
aminopurine, 2-
sq-22451
(9h-purin-2-yl)amine
HMS3373E01
SCHEMBL5631
TS-00023
9h-purin-2-amine #
W-202796
mfcd00005566
DTXSID40196416
CS-W013358
849611-62-7
Z2786042704
Q209313
7h-purin-2-amine (9ci)
BCP32824
W13621
7h-purin-2-ylamine
citronellylcinnamate
7h-purin-2-amine(9ci)
HY-W012642
PD044966

Research Excerpts

Toxicity

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The most common adverse experiences reported as related to study medication (famciclovir and placebo) were headache, nausea, and diarrhea."( Safety of famciclovir in patients with herpes zoster and genital herpes.
Boon, R; Jurewicz, R; Saltzman, R, 1994
)
0.29
" There were no differences between groups in the incidence of adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of famciclovir for treating mucocutaneous herpes simplex infection in HIV-infected individuals. Collaborative Famciclovir HIV Study Group.
Aoki, FY; Lavender, EA; Martel, AY; Parsons, JE; Romanowski, B; Saltzman, RL, 2000
)
0.31
" Four patients in the acyclovir plus placebo group did not complete the study protocol due to adverse events (n = 2), deviation from the protocol (n = 1), or loss to follow-up (n = 1)."( Double-blind, randomized, acyclovir-controlled, parallel-group trial comparing the safety and efficacy of famciclovir and acyclovir in patients with uncomplicated herpes zoster.
Chen, YS; Chiang, PC; Lee, SS; Lin, HH; Liu, YC; Shen, MC, 2004
)
0.32
"3%) VZV-infected patients who received famciclovir three times a day experienced at least one adverse event."( Pharmacokinetics and safety of famciclovir in children with herpes simplex or varicella-zoster virus infection.
Abrams, B; Arguedas, A; Bomgaars, L; De León Castrejón, T; Hamed, K; Kaiser, G; Looby, M; Roberts, M; Rodriguez, A; Sáez-Llorens, X; Spigarelli, MG; Yogev, R; Zhou, W, 2009
)
0.35
" Adverse events were generally mild and transient."( Safety and pharmacokinetics of a single 1500-mg dose of famciclovir in adolescents with recurrent herpes labialis.
Block, SL; Hamed, K; Waldmeier, F; Yogev, R, 2011
)
0.37

Pharmacokinetics

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"The pharmacokinetic profile of penciclovir was determined after a single 500-mg dose of its oral precursor, famciclovir, in 9 healthy volunteers and in 14 patients with chronic hepatic disease."( Pharmacokinetics of famciclovir in subjects with chronic hepatic disease.
Audet, PR; Boike, SC; Fairless, A; Freed, MI; Ilson, BE; Jorkasky, DK; Pue, M; Zariffa, N, 1994
)
0.29
" The possibility of a pharmacokinetic interaction between the anti-viral agent, famciclovir and allopurinol has been investigated in twelve healthy male volunteers following a single oral dose of famciclovir (500 mg) in the presence and absence of steady-state levels of allopurinol (300 mg)."( Lack of a pharmacokinetic interaction between oral famciclovir and allopurinol in healthy volunteers.
Fowles, SE; Laroche, J; Pratt, SK; Prince, WT, 1994
)
0.29
" Plasma and urine concentrations of penciclovir and its 6-deoxy precursor, BRL 42359, were determined and penciclovir plasma concentration-time data submitted to model-independent pharmacokinetic analysis."( Linear pharmacokinetics of penciclovir following administration of single oral doses of famciclovir 125, 250, 500 and 750 mg to healthy volunteers.
Fairless, AJ; Fowles, S; Georgiou, P; Laroche, J; Pratt, SK; Prince, W; Pue, MA, 1994
)
0.29
" Similar pharmacokinetic profiles for DXG were observed following either route of administration in serum, liver and brain."( Biotransformation and pharmacokinetics of prodrug 9-(beta-D-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)-2-aminopurine and its antiviral metabolite 9-(beta-D-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)guanine in mice.
Boudinot, FD; Chu, CK; Manouilov, KK; Manouilova, LS; Schinazi, RF, 1997
)
0.52
" In paediatric patients this may be difficult to achieve due to lack of pharmacokinetic studies, administration of small doses, changes in body composition, continuous growth, and development and maturation of organs and systems."( The pharmacokinetics of antiviral therapy in paediatric patients.
Eksborg, S, 2003
)
0.32
" Several phase I studies were conducted in healthy volunteers over the course of clinical development to evaluate whether pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions exist between emtricitabine and other nucleoside antivirals that are extensively eliminated by renal excretion."( Pharmacokinetic evaluation of emtricitabine in combination with other nucleoside antivirals in healthy volunteers.
Begley, JA; Blum, MR; Chittick, GE; Hui, J; Wang, LH; Zong, J, 2007
)
0.34
" Pooled pharmacokinetic data were generated after single doses in 51 participants (approximately 12."( Pharmacokinetics and safety of famciclovir in children with herpes simplex or varicella-zoster virus infection.
Abrams, B; Arguedas, A; Bomgaars, L; De León Castrejón, T; Hamed, K; Kaiser, G; Looby, M; Roberts, M; Rodriguez, A; Sáez-Llorens, X; Spigarelli, MG; Yogev, R; Zhou, W, 2009
)
0.35
"To develop a population pharmacokinetic model for penciclovir (famciclovir is a prodrug of penciclovir) in adults and children and suggest an appropriate dose for children."( Population pharmacokinetics and optimal design of paediatric studies for famciclovir.
Aarons, L; Graham, G; Kaiser, G; Looby, M; Matthews, I; Ogungbenro, K, 2009
)
0.35
" Population pharmacokinetic modelling was undertaken in NONMEM version VI."( Population pharmacokinetics and optimal design of paediatric studies for famciclovir.
Aarons, L; Graham, G; Kaiser, G; Looby, M; Matthews, I; Ogungbenro, K, 2009
)
0.35
"A population pharmacokinetic model of penciclovir in adults and children has been developed."( Population pharmacokinetics and optimal design of paediatric studies for famciclovir.
Aarons, L; Graham, G; Kaiser, G; Looby, M; Matthews, I; Ogungbenro, K, 2009
)
0.35
" The concentrations of penciclovir declined in a biphasic manner after the peak concentration was attained."( Pharmacokinetics of penciclovir after oral administration of its prodrug famciclovir to horses.
Kondo, T; Kurosawa, M; Matsumura, T; Nagata, S; Nemoto, M; Tsujimura, K; Yamada, M; Yamanaka, T, 2010
)
0.36
" Seventeen infants were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis; one infant experienced immediate emesis and was excluded."( Single-dose pharmacokinetics of famciclovir in infants and population pharmacokinetic analysis in infants and children.
Blumer, J; Hamed, K; Kaiser, G; Rodriguez, A; Sallas, W; Sánchez, PJ, 2010
)
0.36
"OBJECTIVES To determine, following oral administration of famciclovir, pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for 2 of its metabolites (penciclovir and BRL42359) in plasma and tears of healthy cats so that famciclovir dosage recommendations for the treatment of herpetic disease can be optimized."( Pharmacokinetic modeling of penciclovir and BRL42359 in the plasma and tears of healthy cats to optimize dosage recommendations for oral administration of famciclovir.
Knych, HK; Maggs, DJ; Sebbag, L; Thomasy, SM; Woodward, AP, 2016
)
0.43

Compound-Compound Interactions

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Emtricitabine is a potent nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor approved as a once-daily drug in combination with other antiretroviral agents for the treatment of HIV infection."( Pharmacokinetic evaluation of emtricitabine in combination with other nucleoside antivirals in healthy volunteers.
Begley, JA; Blum, MR; Chittick, GE; Hui, J; Wang, LH; Zong, J, 2007
)
0.34
"A quencher-free and enzyme-free fluorescent sensor was proposed to simply and sensitively detect miRNA via the target catalyzed hairpin assembly (CHA) signal amplification in combination with 2-aminopurine (2-AP) molecular beacon (MBs)."( 2-aminopurine probe in combination with catalyzed hairpin assembly signal amplification for simple and sensitive detection of microRNA.
Cai, C; Chen, C; Chen, X; Gong, H; Liu, C; Lv, S, 2017
)
2.09

Bioavailability

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Potential oral prodrugs of the antiherpesvirus acyclonucleoside 9-[4-hydroxy-3-(hydroxymethyl)but-1-yl]guanine (1, BRL 39123) have been synthesized and evaluated for bioavailability of 1 in the blood of mice."( Prodrugs of the selective antiherpesvirus agent 9-[4-hydroxy-3-(hydroxymethyl)but-1-yl]guanine (BRL 39123) with improved gastrointestinal absorption properties.
Boyd, MR; Harnden, MR; Jarvest, RL; Sutton, D; Vere Hodge, RA, 1989
)
0.28
"Famciclovir, a synthetic acyclic guanine derivative, is a prodrug which, after oral administration, is rapidly metabolised to the highly bioavailable antiviral compound penciclovir."( Famciclovir. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in herpesvirus infections.
Perry, CM; Wagstaff, AJ, 1995
)
0.29
"Famciclovir is the well-absorbed oral form of penciclovir, an antiviral agent with potent activity against varicella-zoster virus (VZV) and herpes simplex virus (HSV-1) and 2 (HSV-2)."( Famciclovir: review of clinical efficacy and safety.
Cirelli, R; Herne, K; Lee, P; McCrary, M; Tyring, SK, 1996
)
0.29
" The bioavailability of penciclovir, measured by urinary recovery, is approximately 60% and is not affected by food."( The clinical pharmacokinetics of famciclovir.
Gill, KS; Wood, MJ, 1996
)
0.29
"Famciclovir is the well-absorbed oral form of penciclovir, a potent and selective antiviral agent, with activity against members of the herpesvirus family, including varicella-zoster virus (VZV), and herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1) and HSV-2."( The pharmacological profile of famciclovir.
Crumpacker, C, 1996
)
0.29
" When administered orally, faMciclovir, the oral prodrug of PCV, is better absorbed than acyclovir, yielding an absolute bioavailability of PCV of 77%."( Famciclovir for treatment of herpesvirus infections.
Flaherty, JF; Luber, AD, 1996
)
0.29
" Much of the current antiviral research focuses on providing drugs with (i) improved oral bioavailability and pharmacokinetics which permit less frequent oral or topical dosing for suppressive treatment of herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections, (ii) different mechanisms of action for synergic effects in treating resistant HSV infections in the immunocompromised host and (iii) improved efficacy."( New therapeutic approaches to the alphaherpesvirus infections.
Cassady, KA; Whitley, RJ, 1997
)
0.3
" New antiviral drugs with improved oral bioavailability (famciclovir and valaciclovir) allow a better efficacy."( [Drug clinics. How I treat zona].
Nikkels, AF; Piérard, GE, 1999
)
0.3
" Famciclovir and valacyclovir offer improved oral bioavailability and convenient oral dosing schedules but are more expensive than acyclovir."( Treatment of common cutaneous herpes simplex virus infections.
Emmert, DH, 2000
)
0.31
" Its bioavailability means that it can be taken less frequently than acyclovir, the only other approved herpes treatment."( Drug effective against herpes.
, 1996
)
0.29
" Over the past two decades, the treatment of these conditions has been transformed by guanosine nucleoside antivirals such as valacyclovir (Valtrex, a highly bioavailable prodrug of acyclovir (Zovirax, and famciclovir (Famvir), a highly bioavailable prodrug of penciclovir (Denavir)."( Valacyclovir in the treatment of herpes simplex, herpes zoster, and other viral infections.
Brentjens, MH; Lee, P; Torres, G; Tyring, SK; Wu, JJ; Yeung-Yue, K,
)
0.13
"Famciclovir, the well absorbed oral pro-drug of penciclovir, is effective in the treatment of herpes zoster when given three times daily."( Once, twice, or three times daily famciclovir compared with aciclovir for the oral treatment of herpes zoster in immunocompetent adults: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind clinical trial.
Ashton, R; Candaele, D; Decroix, J; Forszpaniak, C; Paulet, C; Shafran, SD; Tyring, SK; Wade, A, 2004
)
0.32
" Subsequently, the orally bioavailable prodrugs valaciclovir and famciclovir have been introduced."( Recent clinical experience with famciclovir--a "third generation" nucleoside prodrug.
Beutner, K; Chakrabarty, A; Rauser, M; Tyring, SK, 2004
)
0.32
"4 hours, respectively; and penciclovir bioavailability was 12."( Pharmacokinetics of penciclovir in healthy cats following oral administration of famciclovir or intravenous infusion of penciclovir.
Bales, JL; Ferrone, M; Maggs, DJ; Stanley, SD; Thomasy, SM; Whittem, T, 2012
)
0.38
" Out of the six DAP-ANP analogues tested, analogue VI functionalized with a cyclopropyl group on the 6-amino position of the purine ring proves the most effective antiviral DAP-ANP analogue against PrV infection, aided by sufficient hydrophobic character to enhance bioavailability to its cellular target viral DNA-polymerase."( Antiviral activities of 2,6-diaminopurine-based acyclic nucleoside phosphonates against herpesviruses: In vitro study results with pseudorabies virus (PrV, SuHV-1).
Bartheldyova, E; Celechovska, H; Eyer, L; Fojtikova, M; Hubatka, F; Janeba, Z; Koudelka, S; Kovarcik, K; Kulich, P; Lipenska, I; Masek, J; Miller, AD; Neca, J; Plockova, J; Prochazka, L; Raska, M; Ruzek, D; Slany, M; Turanek, J; Turanek-Knotigova, P; Zouharova, D, 2016
)
0.43

Dosage Studied

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" Mutational dose-response studies with X-rays, ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS), and ICR-191 were conducted in 4 of these revertant cell lines."( Heritable alterations at the adenine phosphoribosyltransferase (APRT) locus in human lymphoblastoid cell lines.
Amundson, SA; Fortunato, JE; Liber, HL, 1992
)
0.28
" PDGF displays a steep dose-response relationship in the 1-5 ng/ml range."( Activation of signal transduction pathways protects quiescent Balb/c-3T3 fibroblasts against death due to serum deprivation.
Kikuchi, T; Tamm, I, 1991
)
0.28
" Dose-response curves showed that AHA and HAP were about equally mutagenic at low doses but that AHA was more mutagenic than HAP at high doses."( Effect of the uvs-2 allele of Neurospora crassa on the mutagenic potency of two N-hydroxylaminopurines and 2-aminopurine in the ad-3 forward-mutation test.
Brockman, HE; de Serres, FJ; Hung, CY; Ong, T, 1989
)
0.49
" These subsequent studies confirmed that, after oral dosing with famciclovir, more than half the dose was absorbed and rapidly converted to penciclovir."( Selection of an oral prodrug (BRL 42810; famciclovir) for the antiherpesvirus agent BRL 39123 [9-(4-hydroxy-3-hydroxymethylbut-l-yl)guanine; penciclovir].
Boyd, MR; Harnden, MR; Jarvest, RL; Sutton, D; Vere Hodge, RA, 1989
)
0.28
" Both 5 and its esters (14-17, 21, 22) and also 18 were well absorbed after oral administration and converted efficiently to 1, the diacetyl (14) and dipropionyl (16) esters providing concentrations of 1 in the blood that were more than 15-fold higher than those observed after dosing either 1 or its esters (25-27)."( Prodrugs of the selective antiherpesvirus agent 9-[4-hydroxy-3-(hydroxymethyl)but-1-yl]guanine (BRL 39123) with improved gastrointestinal absorption properties.
Boyd, MR; Harnden, MR; Jarvest, RL; Sutton, D; Vere Hodge, RA, 1989
)
0.28
" The results of these and other experiments suggest that in these variants resistance to DAP is due to an altered aprt gene dosage and point to a possible genetic effect of colcemid and other aneuploidizing agents in somatic mammalian cells."( Gene dosage mutants at adenine phosphoribosyltransferase locus induced by colcemid in Chinese hamster V79-AP4 cells.
Colella, CM; Della Valle, G; Mariani, T; Peverali, AF; Piras, A; Rainaldi, G; Simi, S; Simili, M; Talarico, D; van Boxel, T, 1988
)
0.27
" When dosing was reduced to once per day, both compounds were less effective at controlling the infection."( Comparison of efficacies of famciclovir and valaciclovir against herpes simplex virus type 1 in a murine immunosuppression model.
Field, HJ; Sutton, D; Tewari, D; Thackray, AM, 1995
)
0.29
" On oral dosing of famciclovir to humans, only penciclovir and BRL 42359 can be detected consistently in the plasma; thus, attention was focused on the oxidation reaction."( Role of aldehyde oxidase in the in vitro conversion of famciclovir to penciclovir in human liver.
Chenery, RJ; Clarke, SE; Harrell, AW, 1995
)
0.29
"Consideration should be given to modification of the dosing schedule of famciclovir from the usual 8-hour interval to a 12-hour interval for patients with moderate renal impairment (CLCR 30 to 59 ml/min/1."( Pharmacokinetics of famciclovir in subjects with varying degrees of renal impairment.
Audet, PR; Boike, SC; Fairless, A; Freed, MI; Ilson, BE; Jorkasky, DK; Pue, MA; Zariffa, N, 1994
)
0.29
" Thus, famciclovir is now established as an effective treatment of immunocompetent patients with herpes zoster or genital herpes infection, particularly as famciclovir is administered in a convenient dosage regimen that may improve compliance compared with aciclovir."( Famciclovir. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in herpesvirus infections.
Perry, CM; Wagstaff, AJ, 1995
)
0.29
" Dosage adjustment is required in the presence of renal impairment."( Pharmacokinetics of new antiherpetic agents.
Rolan, P, 1995
)
0.29
" Dosage adjustment is not required for famciclovir in elderly patients with normal or mildly impaired renal function, and the extent of penciclovir availability is not affected by food."( The pharmacological profile of famciclovir.
Crumpacker, C, 1996
)
0.29
" The dosage of famciclovir for herpes zoster in immunocompetent individuals is 500 mg po tid for 7 days; for recurrent genital herpes a dosage of 125 mg po bid for 5 days is recommended."( Famciclovir for treatment of herpesvirus infections.
Flaherty, JF; Luber, AD, 1996
)
0.29
"Given its comparable efficacy, similar adverse effect profile, and less frequent dosing schedule than acyclovir, famciclovir represents a viable alternative for treatment of herpes zoster and for episodic therapy of recurrent genital herpes in immunocompetent adults."( Famciclovir for treatment of herpesvirus infections.
Flaherty, JF; Luber, AD, 1996
)
0.29
" Much of the current antiviral research focuses on providing drugs with (i) improved oral bioavailability and pharmacokinetics which permit less frequent oral or topical dosing for suppressive treatment of herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections, (ii) different mechanisms of action for synergic effects in treating resistant HSV infections in the immunocompromised host and (iii) improved efficacy."( New therapeutic approaches to the alphaherpesvirus infections.
Cassady, KA; Whitley, RJ, 1997
)
0.3
" Famciclovir and valacyclovir demonstrate superior pharmacokinetics compared with acyclovir and allow for less frequent daily dosing with higher achievable serum drug concentrations."( Management of herpes simplex and varicella-zoster virus infections.
Erlich, KS, 1997
)
0.3
" With the completion of the first efficacy trials for each of these agents it has become apparent that, whilst less frequent dosing can he accomplished, it is not easy to significantly improve on the efficacy of aciclovir."( Antiviral drugs in development for herpes zoster.
Fiddian, AP, 1996
)
0.29
" The pharmacokinetics of famciclovir allow a more convenient dosing schedule than the schedule used with acyclovir."( Famciclovir: a new systemic antiviral agent for herpesvirus infections.
Stott, GA, 1997
)
0.3
" New areas of retinitis developed within the posterior pole despite treatment with the maximum dosage of acyclovir; thus, we used a new antiviral agent, famciclovir."( Famciclovir for the treatment of acute retinal necrosis (ARN) syndrome.
Figueroa, MS; Fortun, J; Garabito, I; Gutierrez, C, 1997
)
0.3
" Famciclovir is effective in the suppression and treatment of HSV infections; however, no studies have examined the optimum dosing regimen for HSV prophylaxis in laser resurfacing."( Famciclovir prophylaxis of herpes simplex virus reactivation after laser skin resurfacing.
Alster, TS; Nanni, CA, 1999
)
0.3
" Famciclovir and valacyclovir offer improved oral bioavailability and convenient oral dosing schedules but are more expensive than acyclovir."( Treatment of common cutaneous herpes simplex virus infections.
Emmert, DH, 2000
)
0.31
" The prodrugs valacyclovir and famciclovir offer easier, less-frequent dosing than required for acyclovir."( Progress in meeting today's demands in genital herpes: an overview of current management.
Patel, R, 2002
)
0.31
"Valacyclovir is the only oral antiviral agent approved for therapy of herpes labialis, the only antiviral drug approved for a 3-day course in the episodic treatment of recurrent genital herpes, as well as the only antiviral drug approved for once daily dosing for suppressive therapy."( Valacyclovir in the treatment of herpes simplex, herpes zoster, and other viral infections.
Brentjens, MH; Lee, P; Torres, G; Tyring, SK; Wu, JJ; Yeung-Yue, K,
)
0.13
" Prophylactic oral antiviral agents are administered routinely to patients undergoing laser resurfacing to prevent postoperative HSV-1 eruptions; however, dosage and duration of treatment vary in the literature."( Herpes simplex virus prophylaxis with famciclovir in patients undergoing aesthetic facial CO2 laser resurfacing.
Bisaccia, E; Scarborough, D, 2003
)
0.32
" The treatment for recurrent hepatitis B after liver transplantation includes increased dosage of lamivudine, application of famciclovir, and other liver protection measures."( Prophylaxis and treatment of hepatitis B virus reinfection following liver transplantation.
Huang, DS; Liang, TB; Wang, WL; Wu, J; Xu, X; Zheng, SS, 2002
)
0.31
" Choice of therapy would then depend on convenience of dosing and cost."( Antiviral treatment of genital herpes.
Apoola, A; Radcliffe, K, 2004
)
0.32
" These compounds offer high oral bioavailabilty and deliver acyclovir and penciclovir, respectively, to the target cells by means of more convenient dosing schedules."( Recent clinical experience with famciclovir--a "third generation" nucleoside prodrug.
Beutner, K; Chakrabarty, A; Rauser, M; Tyring, SK, 2004
)
0.32
"In immunocompetent adults with recurrent genital herpes, a 5-day course of famciclovir at a dosage of 125 mg, 250 mg, or 500 mg twice per day was significantly more effective than was placebo in reducing the duration of viral shedding and symptoms and in accelerating lesion healing."( Clinic-initiated, twice-daily oral famciclovir for treatment of recurrent genital herpes: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.
Aoki, FY; Lassonde, M; Martel, AY; Sacks, SL; Shafran, SD, 2005
)
0.33
" Although traditional therapy for a recurrent episode for healthy adults has consisted of twice-daily dosing for 5 days, recent studies have indicated that shorter courses of antiviral therapy are effective."( Single-day, patient-initiated famciclovir therapy for recurrent genital herpes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Aoki, FY; Diaz-Mitoma, F; Gao, J; Gross, G; Hamed, K; Tyring, S, 2006
)
0.33
" The factors influencing the choice of therapy, such as cost, ease of dosing and acyclovir resistance are also discussed."( Genital herpes: antiviral therapy for symptom relief and prevention of transmission.
Gupta, R; Wald, A, 2006
)
0.33
" single-day bid famciclovir and placebo in the treatment of herpes labialis demonstrated single-dose famciclovir to be as efficacious as single-day bid dosing in time to healing of lesions and more efficacious than single-day bid famciclovir in time to resolution of pain and tenderness."( Single-dose famciclovir for the treatment of herpes labialis.
Hamed, K; Hull, C; Spruance, S; Tyring, S, 2006
)
0.33
" Its pharmacokinetics allow for administration in a convenient dosing regimen compared with acyclovir, which may improve compliance."( Famciclovir for the treatment of recurrent genital herpes: a clinical and pharmacological perspective.
Aoki, FY; Vinh, DC, 2006
)
0.33
" Convenient patient-initiated single-day (for recurrent genital herpes) and single-dose (for orolabial herpes) dosage regimens may contribute to treatment compliance, patient acceptability and subsequent treatment outcomes."( Famciclovir: a review of its use in herpes zoster and genital and orolabial herpes.
Lyseng-Williamson, KA; Simpson, D, 2006
)
0.33
" Famciclovir has received single-day dosing indications for both of these entities."( Famciclovir for cutaneous herpesvirus infections: an update and review of new single-day dosing indications.
Chacko, M; Weinberg, JM, 2007
)
0.34
"Penciclovir pharmacokinetics following oral famciclovir administration in cats appeared complex within the dosage range studied."( Pharmacokinetics and safety of penciclovir following oral administration of famciclovir to cats.
Maggs, DJ; Moulin, NK; Stanley, SD; Thomasy, SM, 2007
)
0.34
" Whereas the diagnosis of this condition is often straightforward, choosing an appropriate drug (eg, acyclovir, valacyclovir hydrochloride, or famciclovir) and dosing regimen can be confusing in view of (1) competing clinical approaches to therapy; (2) evolving dosing schedules based on new research; (3) approved regimens of the Food and Drug Administration that may not match recommendations of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or of other experts; and (4) dissimilar regimens for oral and genital infections."( The treatment of herpes simplex infections: an evidence-based review.
Brodell, RT; Cernik, C; Gallina, K, 2008
)
0.35
" More rigorous clinical trials are required to optimise the dosing regimen for safe and effective specific anti-herpes treatment in feline clinical medicine."( Treatment of feline herpesvirus-1 associated disease in cats with famciclovir and related drugs.
Graham, PG; Lessels, NS; Malik, R; Meek, M; Norris, JM; Power, H; Vitale, C; Webb, S, 2009
)
0.35
" An eight-step weight-based dosing regimen was developed to optimize exposure in smaller children and was used in the 7-day multiple-dose safety phases of both studies, which enrolled 100 patients with confirmed/suspected viral infections."( Pharmacokinetics and safety of famciclovir in children with herpes simplex or varicella-zoster virus infection.
Abrams, B; Arguedas, A; Bomgaars, L; De León Castrejón, T; Hamed, K; Kaiser, G; Looby, M; Roberts, M; Rodriguez, A; Sáez-Llorens, X; Spigarelli, MG; Yogev, R; Zhou, W, 2009
)
0.35
" An eight-step dosing regimen was derived that targeted exposure in infants and children 6 months to 12 years of age to match the penciclovir AUC seen in adults after a 500-mg dose of famciclovir."( Single-dose pharmacokinetics of famciclovir in infants and population pharmacokinetic analysis in infants and children.
Blumer, J; Hamed, K; Kaiser, G; Rodriguez, A; Sallas, W; Sánchez, PJ, 2010
)
0.36
" Furthermore, the superior pharmacokinetics and more convenient dosing regimens with the use of valaciclovir and famciclovir clearly make them the preferred treatment option."( Antivirals for management of herpes zoster including ophthalmicus: a systematic review of high-quality randomized controlled trials.
de Kock, J; McDonald, EM; Ram, FS, 2012
)
0.38
"Penciclovir pharmacokinetics following oral administration of famciclovir were nonlinear within the dosage range studied, likely because of saturation of famciclovir metabolism."( Pharmacokinetics of penciclovir in healthy cats following oral administration of famciclovir or intravenous infusion of penciclovir.
Bales, JL; Ferrone, M; Maggs, DJ; Stanley, SD; Thomasy, SM; Whittem, T, 2012
)
0.38
" Six of 16 patients (37%) receiving long-term oral acyclovir had recurrent HSV, at least one case of which followed a growth spurt that caused the baseline dosage of acyclovir to become subtherapeutic."( Pediatric herpes simplex of the anterior segment: characteristics, treatment, and outcomes.
Colby, KA; Liu, S; Pavan-Langston, D, 2012
)
0.38
" Oral acyclovir is effective, but the dosage must be adjusted as the child grows."( Pediatric herpes simplex of the anterior segment: characteristics, treatment, and outcomes.
Colby, KA; Liu, S; Pavan-Langston, D, 2012
)
0.38
" However, drug concentrations were noninhibitory during 42% of the dosing cycle."( Rapid viral expansion and short drug half-life explain the incomplete effectiveness of current herpes simplex virus 2-directed antiviral agents.
Corey, L; Schiffer, JT; Swan, DA; Wald, A, 2013
)
0.39
" In analyzing parallel-group trials by daily dose, no clear evidence was found of a dose-response relationship for any drug."( Oral antiviral therapy for prevention of genital herpes outbreaks in immunocompetent and nonpregnant patients.
Chosidow, O; Do, G; Le Cleach, L; Lebrun-Vignes, B; Maruani, A; Ravaud, P; Trinquart, L, 2014
)
0.4
"OBJECTIVES To determine, following oral administration of famciclovir, pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for 2 of its metabolites (penciclovir and BRL42359) in plasma and tears of healthy cats so that famciclovir dosage recommendations for the treatment of herpetic disease can be optimized."( Pharmacokinetic modeling of penciclovir and BRL42359 in the plasma and tears of healthy cats to optimize dosage recommendations for oral administration of famciclovir.
Knych, HK; Maggs, DJ; Sebbag, L; Thomasy, SM; Woodward, AP, 2016
)
0.43
" Further studies are needed to assess whether a famciclovir dosage of 90 versus 40 mg/kg, PO, 3 times/d would result in increased efficacy and shorter treatment time."( Oral administration of famciclovir for treatment of spontaneous ocular, respiratory, or dermatologic disease attributed to feline herpesvirus type 1: 59 cases (2006-2013).
Freeman, KS; Kass, PH; Lim, CC; Maggs, DJ; Outerbridge, CA; Shull, O; Strom, AR; Thomasy, SM, 2016
)
0.43
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (1)

RoleDescription
antimetaboliteA substance which is structurally similar to a metabolite but which competes with it or replaces it, and so prevents or reduces its normal utilization.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (2)

ClassDescription
2-aminopurinesAny aminopurine having the amino substituent at the 2-position.
nucleobase analogueA molecule that can substitute for a normal nucleobase in nucleic acids.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Protein Targets (11)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Chain A, Beta-lactamaseEscherichia coli K-12Potency10.00000.044717.8581100.0000AID485294
thioredoxin reductaseRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency15.84890.100020.879379.4328AID588453
aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family, member A1Homo sapiens (human)Potency37.65050.011212.4002100.0000AID1030
IDH1Homo sapiens (human)Potency0.46110.005210.865235.4813AID686970
Guanine nucleotide-binding protein GHomo sapiens (human)Potency11.22021.995325.532750.1187AID624288
TAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)Potency39.81071.778316.208135.4813AID652104
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase alphaHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)341.60000.28003.69007.1000AID155650
Xanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)200.00000.00132.81389.8200AID287937
Phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-betaHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)341.60007.10007.10007.1000AID155650
Phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-alphaHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)341.60007.10007.10007.1000AID155650
Phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase betaHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)341.60000.01832.45107.1000AID155650
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (60)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
phosphorylationPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase alphaHomo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylinositol biosynthetic processPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase alphaHomo sapiens (human)
signal transductionPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase alphaHomo sapiens (human)
modulation by host of viral processPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase alphaHomo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylinositol phosphate biosynthetic processPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase alphaHomo sapiens (human)
reorganization of cellular membranes to establish viral sites of replicationPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase alphaHomo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylinositol-mediated signalingPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase alphaHomo sapiens (human)
allantoin metabolic processXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of protein phosphorylationXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of endothelial cell proliferationXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
guanine catabolic processXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
inosine catabolic processXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
deoxyinosine catabolic processXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
adenosine catabolic processXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
deoxyadenosine catabolic processXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
deoxyguanosine catabolic processXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
AMP catabolic processXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
IMP catabolic processXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
activation of cysteine-type endopeptidase activity involved in apoptotic processXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
lactationXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
hypoxanthine catabolic processXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
xanthine catabolic processXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
iron-sulfur cluster assemblyXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
amide catabolic processXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of endothelial cell differentiationXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
GMP catabolic processXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
dGMP catabolic processXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
dAMP catabolic processXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B signal transductionXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of p38MAPK cascadeXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor signaling pathwayXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of vasculogenesisXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of inflammatory response to antigenic stimulusGuanine nucleotide-binding protein GHomo sapiens (human)
renal water homeostasisGuanine nucleotide-binding protein GHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayGuanine nucleotide-binding protein GHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of insulin secretionGuanine nucleotide-binding protein GHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucagon stimulusGuanine nucleotide-binding protein GHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of protein phosphorylationTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA processingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
RNA splicingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of protein stabilityTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of insulin secretionTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
response to endoplasmic reticulum stressTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein import into nucleusTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of circadian rhythmTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of apoptotic processTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation by host of viral transcriptionTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
rhythmic processTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
3'-UTR-mediated mRNA destabilizationTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
3'-UTR-mediated mRNA stabilizationTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear inner membrane organizationTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
amyloid fibril formationTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of gene expressionTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylinositol biosynthetic processPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-betaHomo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylinositol phosphate biosynthetic processPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-betaHomo sapiens (human)
endosome organizationPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-betaHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi organizationPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-betaHomo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylinositol biosynthetic processPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-alphaHomo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylinositol phosphate biosynthetic processPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-alphaHomo sapiens (human)
endosome organizationPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-alphaHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi organizationPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-alphaHomo sapiens (human)
lysosome organizationPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase betaHomo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylinositol biosynthetic processPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase betaHomo sapiens (human)
receptor-mediated endocytosisPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase betaHomo sapiens (human)
signal transductionPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase betaHomo sapiens (human)
inner ear developmentPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase betaHomo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylinositol phosphate biosynthetic processPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase betaHomo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylinositol-mediated signalingPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase betaHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (29)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
1-phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase activityPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase alphaHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase alphaHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase alphaHomo sapiens (human)
kinase activityPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cadherin bindingPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase alphaHomo sapiens (human)
xanthine dehydrogenase activityXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
xanthine oxidase activityXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
iron ion bindingXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
protein homodimerization activityXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
molybdopterin cofactor bindingXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
flavin adenine dinucleotide bindingXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
2 iron, 2 sulfur cluster bindingXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
hypoxanthine dehydrogenase activityXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
hypoxanthine oxidase activityXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
FAD bindingXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
G protein activityGuanine nucleotide-binding protein GHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase activator activityGuanine nucleotide-binding protein GHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
double-stranded DNA bindingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
RNA bindingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA 3'-UTR bindingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
lipid bindingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
pre-mRNA intronic bindingTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
molecular condensate scaffold activityTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
1-phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase activityPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-betaHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-betaHomo sapiens (human)
magnesium ion bindingPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-alphaHomo sapiens (human)
1-phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase activityPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-alphaHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-alphaHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-alphaHomo sapiens (human)
AP-3 adaptor complex bindingPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-alphaHomo sapiens (human)
1-phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase activityPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase betaHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase betaHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase betaHomo sapiens (human)
14-3-3 protein bindingPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase betaHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (38)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
cytoplasmPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase alphaHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membranePhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase alphaHomo sapiens (human)
focal adhesionPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase alphaHomo sapiens (human)
membranePhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase alphaHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi-associated vesicle membranePhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase alphaHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomePhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase alphaHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membranePhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
peroxisomeXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
sarcoplasmic reticulumXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceXanthine dehydrogenase/oxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGuanine nucleotide-binding protein GHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular non-membrane-bounded organelleTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
perichromatin fibrilsTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic stress granuleTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear speckTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
interchromatin granuleTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
chromatinTAR DNA-binding protein 43Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi membranePhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-betaHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membranePhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-betaHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-betaHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membranePhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-betaHomo sapiens (human)
membranePhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-betaHomo sapiens (human)
early endosome membranePhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-betaHomo sapiens (human)
endosomePhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-betaHomo sapiens (human)
trans-Golgi networkPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-betaHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membranePhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-betaHomo sapiens (human)
BLOC-1 complexPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-alphaHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi membranePhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-alphaHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-alphaHomo sapiens (human)
lysosomal membranePhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-alphaHomo sapiens (human)
endosomePhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-alphaHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membranePhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-alphaHomo sapiens (human)
membranePhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-alphaHomo sapiens (human)
dendritePhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic vesiclePhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-alphaHomo sapiens (human)
early endosome membranePhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-alphaHomo sapiens (human)
growing cell tipPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-alphaHomo sapiens (human)
presynaptic membranePhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-alphaHomo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-alphaHomo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell bodyPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-alphaHomo sapiens (human)
perikaryonPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-alphaHomo sapiens (human)
membrane raftPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-alphaHomo sapiens (human)
trans-Golgi networkPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-alphaHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membranePhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-alphaHomo sapiens (human)
endosomePhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase type 2-alphaHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi membranePhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase betaHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial outer membranePhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase betaHomo sapiens (human)
endosomePhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase betaHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase betaHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase betaHomo sapiens (human)
rough endoplasmic reticulum membranePhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase betaHomo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase betaHomo sapiens (human)
membranePhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase betaHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmPhosphatidylinositol 4-kinase betaHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (23)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID651635Viability Counterscreen for Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID504812Inverse Agonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID504810Antagonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID1347154Primary screen GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1508630Primary qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome: Secreted ER Calcium Modulated Protein (SERCaMP) assay2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID1324539Cytotoxicity against African green monkey Vero cells incubated for 24 hrs by neutral red uptake assay2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 12-08, Volume: 59, Issue:23
In Silico Discovery and Validation of Amide Based Small Molecule Targeting the Enzymatic Site of Shiga Toxin.
AID155650Inhibitory activity (IC50) against human phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase at the ATP binding site1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 33, Issue:8
Purine derivatives as competitive inhibitors of human erythrocyte membrane phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase.
AID155653Binding affinity (Ki) against human phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 33, Issue:8
Purine derivatives as competitive inhibitors of human erythrocyte membrane phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase.
AID1452128Inhibition of ATPgammaS-BODIPY binding to Thermotoga maritima His-tagged HK853 expressed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3)pLysS Rosetta preincubated for 30 mins prior to ATPgammaS-BODIPY addition measured after 1 hr by coomassie staining-based SDS-PAGE analys2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-12, Volume: 60, Issue:19
Rational Design of Selective Adenine-Based Scaffolds for Inactivation of Bacterial Histidine Kinases.
AID274559Inhibition of Toxoplasma gondii 6 oxopurine phosphoribosyl transferase2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-14, Volume: 49, Issue:25
Lead compounds for antimalarial chemotherapy: purine base analogs discriminate between human and P. falciparum 6-oxopurine phosphoribosyltransferases.
AID1254099Binding affinity to rabbit muscle glycogen phosphorylase by STD NMR spectrometric analysis2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-12, Volume: 58, Issue:21
Ligand-Orientation Based Fragment Selection in STD NMR Screening.
AID287937Inhibition of human xanthine oxidase2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 15, Issue:10
The screening and characterization of 6-aminopurine-based xanthine oxidase inhibitors.
AID1437510Inhibition of human GST-tagged CDK2/bovine His-tagged Cyclin A at 100 uM relative to untreated control2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-09, Volume: 60, Issue:5
Cyclin-Dependent Kinase (CDK) Inhibitors: Structure-Activity Relationships and Insights into the CDK-2 Selectivity of 6-Substituted 2-Arylaminopurines.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (1,351)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-1990177 (13.10)18.7374
1990's329 (24.35)18.2507
2000's516 (38.19)29.6817
2010's293 (21.69)24.3611
2020's36 (2.66)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 54.23

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index54.23 (24.57)
Research Supply Index7.31 (2.92)
Research Growth Index4.66 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index91.54 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (54.23)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials90 (6.39%)5.53%
Reviews162 (11.50%)6.00%
Case Studies97 (6.88%)4.05%
Observational0 (0.00%)0.25%
Other1,060 (75.23%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (16)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Phase 2 Study of Blinatumomab (NSC# 765986) in Combination With Nivolumab (NSC # 748726), a Checkpoint Inhibitor of PD-1, in B-ALL Patients Aged >/= 1 to < 31 Years Old With First Relapse [NCT04546399]Phase 2550 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-04Suspended(stopped due to Other - FDA Partial Clinical Hold)
A Phase III Randomized Trial Investigating Bortezomib (NSC# 681239) on a Modified Augmented BFM (ABFM) Backbone in Newly Diagnosed T-Lymphoblastic Leukemia (T-ALL) and T-Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (T-LLy) [NCT02112916]Phase 3847 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-04Active, not recruiting
International Phase 3 Trial in Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Ph+ALL) Testing Imatinib in Combination With Two Different Cytotoxic Chemotherapy Backbones [NCT03007147]Phase 3475 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-08-08Recruiting
Risk-Stratified Randomized Phase III Testing of Blinatumomab (NSC#765986) in First Relapse of Childhood B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL) [NCT02101853]Phase 3669 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-17Active, not recruiting
Intensified Methotrexate, Nelarabine (Compound 506U78) and Augmented BFM Therapy for Children and Young Adults With Newly Diagnosed T-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) or T-cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma [NCT00408005]Phase 31,895 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-22Active, not recruiting
High Risk B-Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) [NCT00075725]Phase 33,154 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-29Completed
Standard Risk B-precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) [NCT00103285]Phase 35,377 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-11Completed
A Phase 3 Trial Investigating Blinatumomab (NSC# 765986) in Combination With Chemotherapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Standard Risk or Down Syndrome B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL) and the Treatment of Patients With Localized B-Lymphoblastic Lymphom [NCT03914625]Phase 36,720 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-03Recruiting
Risk-Stratified Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Down Syndrome [NCT02521493]Phase 3312 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-12-23Active, not recruiting
A Pilot Study of Intravenous EZN-2285 (SC-PEG E. Coli L-asparaginase) or Intravenous Oncaspar® in the Treatment of Patients With High-Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) [NCT00671034]Phase 3166 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-21Completed
Treatment of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Standard Risk B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL) or Localized B-Lineage Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (B-LLy) [NCT01190930]Phase 39,350 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-09Active, not recruiting
Intensified PEG-Asparaginase in High Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL): A Pilot Study [NCT00866307]Phase 1104 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-23Completed
A Groupwide Pilot Study to Test the Tolerability and Biologic Activity of the Addition of Azacitidine (NSC# 102816) to Chemotherapy in Infants With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) and KMT2A (MLL) Gene Rearrangement [NCT02828358]Phase 278 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-01Active, not recruiting
A Phase III Randomized Trial for Newly Diagnosed High Risk B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL) Including a Stratum Evaluating Dasatinib (NSC#732517) in Patients With Ph-like Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) Sensitive Mutations [NCT02883049]Phase 35,937 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Active, not recruiting
A Randomized International Phase 3 Trial of Imatinib and Chemotherapy With or Without Blinatumomab in Patients With Newly-Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive or Philadelphia Chromosome-Like ABL-Class B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [NCT06124157]Phase 3680 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-22Not yet recruiting
A Phase 3 Randomized Trial of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin (NSC#: 772518) for Newly Diagnosed High-Risk B-ALL; Risk-Adapted Post-Induction Therapy for High-Risk B-ALL, Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemia, and Disseminated B-LLy [NCT03959085]Phase 34,772 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-31Recruiting
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00075725 (7) [back to overview]Correlation of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative With Overall Survival (OS).
NCT00075725 (7) [back to overview]Correlation of Early Marrow Response Status With MRD Negative.
NCT00075725 (7) [back to overview]Correlation of Early Marrow Response Status With MRD Positive.
NCT00075725 (7) [back to overview]Correlation of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative With Event Free Survival (EFS).
NCT00075725 (7) [back to overview]Correlation of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Positive With Event Free Survival (EFS)
NCT00075725 (7) [back to overview]Correlation of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Positive With Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00075725 (7) [back to overview]Comparison of the Increase in Cure Rate of High Risk ALL Without Causing More Serious Side Effects Between Interventions
NCT00103285 (10) [back to overview]Early Marrow Status (EMS) by MRD Status End Induction (Day 29)
NCT00103285 (10) [back to overview]Event-Free Survival (EFS) for Low MRD (Negative) Subjects by Genetic Subset (TEL/Trisomy Positive vs Negative)
NCT00103285 (10) [back to overview]Event-free Survival (EFS) for SR-High Patients.
NCT00103285 (10) [back to overview]Event-free Survival (EFS) for SR-Low Patients
NCT00103285 (10) [back to overview]Event-Free Survival Probability According to MRD Status End Induction (Day 29)
NCT00103285 (10) [back to overview]Overall Survival Probability (OS) According to Induction Day 29 MRD Status
NCT00103285 (10) [back to overview]Event-free Survival (EFS) for SR-Average ALL Patients
NCT00103285 (10) [back to overview]Event-free Survival (EFS) for SR-Average ALL Patients
NCT00103285 (10) [back to overview]Health-related Quality of Life Relative to Physical, Social and Emotional Impairment
NCT00103285 (10) [back to overview]Optimal Time Point for Advance Health Related Quality of Life Intervention
NCT00408005 (8) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival (DFS) for Randomized Methotrexate T-ALL Cohort (Arm I + Arm II vs. Arm III + Arm IV)
NCT00408005 (8) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival (DFS) for Randomized Methotrexate T-ALL Cohort (Arm I vs. Arm II vs. Arm III vs. Arm IV)
NCT00408005 (8) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival (DFS) for Randomized Nelarabine T-ALL Cohort (Arm I + Arm III vs. Arm II + Arm IV)
NCT00408005 (8) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival (DFS) for Randomized Nelarabine T-ALL Cohort (Arm I vs. Arm II vs. Arm III vs. Arm IV)
NCT00408005 (8) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of CNS Relapse for T-ALL by Risk Group
NCT00408005 (8) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of CNS Relapse for T-ALL by Risk Group
NCT00408005 (8) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival (DFS) for T-cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (T-LLy) Cohort
NCT00408005 (8) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival (DFS) for T-cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (T-LLy) Cohort
NCT00671034 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission at the End of Induction
NCT00671034 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Event-free Survival (EFS)
NCT00671034 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)<0.01% at the End of Induction
NCT00671034 (9) [back to overview]Asparaginase Level
NCT00671034 (9) [back to overview]Pharmacodynamics (PD)
NCT00671034 (9) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (PK) (Half-life of SC-PEG E. Coli L-asparaginase (EZN-2285) Compared to Pegaspargase During Induction and Consolidation Therapy)
NCT00671034 (9) [back to overview]Plasma and CSF Concentrations of Asparagine in ug/ml
NCT00671034 (9) [back to overview]Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)
NCT00671034 (9) [back to overview]Immunogenicity
NCT00866307 (2) [back to overview]AALL08P1 Safety Outcome
NCT00866307 (2) [back to overview]AALL08P1 Feasibility Outcome
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Right
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]DFS for SR Down Syndrome Patients With Standardized Treatment and Enhanced Supportive Care
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]DFS in Average Risk (AR) Patients Based on the Pulse Frequency Randomization
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]DFS in Low Risk (LR) Patients Based on Randomization to 1 of 2 Low-intensity Regimens
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival (DFS) in Average Risk (AR) Patients Based on the Methotrexate Dose Randomization
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Event Free Survival (EFS) for B-LLy Patients
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) for B-LLy Patients
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Sample Collection of Central Path Review Slides in B-LLy Patients
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Maintenance Cycle 4: Emotional
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Maintenance Cycle 4: Physical
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Maintenance Cycle 4: Social Functioning
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Emotional
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Physical
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Social Functioning
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Consolidation Therapy: Emotional
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Consolidation Therapy: Physical
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Consolidation Therapy: Social Functioning
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 1: Emotional
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 1: Physical
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 1: Social Functioning
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 4: Emotional
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 4: Physical
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 4: Social Functioning
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Emotional
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Physical
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Social Functioning
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in Boy AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Therapy: Emotional
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in Boy AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Therapy: Physical
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in Boy AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Therapy: Social Functioning
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in Boy AR Patients Overall at End of Therapy: Emotional
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in Boy AR Patients Overall at End of Therapy: Physical
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Burden of Therapy in Boy AR Patients Overall at End of Therapy: Social Functioning
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL 12 Months Post Therapy: Left
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL 12 Months Post Therapy: Right
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL at End of Consolidation Therapy-Left
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL at End of Consolidation Therapy-Right
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL at End of Maintenance Cycle 1: Left
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL at End of Maintenance Cycle 1: Right
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Left
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Right
NCT01190930 (41) [back to overview]Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Left
NCT02101853 (4) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival (DFS) of High-risk (HR) and Intermediate-risk (IR) Relapse Patients
NCT02101853 (4) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival (DFS) of Low Risk (LR) Relapse Patients
NCT02101853 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) of HR and IR Relapse Patients
NCT02101853 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) of LR Relapse Patients
NCT02112916 (6) [back to overview]EFS for Very High Risk (VHR) T-ALL Patients Treated With High Risk (HR) Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (BFM) Intensification Blocks Who Become Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative and Those Who Remain MRD Positive at the End of HR Block 3
NCT02112916 (6) [back to overview]EFS for Very High Risk (VHR) T-LLy Patients Treated With HR Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (BFM) Intensification Blocks Who Have Complete or Partial Remission and Those Who do Not Respond
NCT02112916 (6) [back to overview]Event-free Survival (EFS) for Modified Augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster Backbone With or Without Bortezomib in All Randomized Patients
NCT02112916 (6) [back to overview]Toxicity Rates Associated With Modified Standard Therapy, Including Dexamethasone and Additional Pegaspargase
NCT02112916 (6) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence Rates of Isolated Central Nervous System (CNS) Relapse for SR and IR T-ALL Patients on the Non-bortezomib Containing Arm on This Study (no CRT) and Similar Patients on AALL0434 (Receive CRT)
NCT02112916 (6) [back to overview]EFS for Standard (SR) and Intermediate Risk (IR) T-ALL Patients on the Non-bortezomib Containing Arm on This Study (no Cranial Radiation Therapy [CRT]) and Similar Patients on AALL0434 (Received CRT)
NCT02828358 (5) [back to overview]Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 1 Prior to First Course of Azacitidine
NCT02828358 (5) [back to overview]Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 1 Prior to Second Course of Azacitidine
NCT02828358 (5) [back to overview]Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 5 of First Course of Azacitidine
NCT02828358 (5) [back to overview]Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 5 of Second Course of Azacitidine
NCT02828358 (5) [back to overview]Tolerability of Azacitidine in Combination With Interfant-06 Standard Chemotherapy in Evaluable Infant Patients With Newly Diagnosed ALL With KMT2A Gene Rearrangement (KMT2A-R). KMT2A Gene Rearrangement (KMT2A-R)

Correlation of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative With Overall Survival (OS).

Bone marrow MRD status is defined as negative with < .01 detectable leukemia cells. (NCT00075725)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dexamethasone and Capizzi Methotrexate Patients < 10 Years95.4
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (Non Randomly Assigned)92.9
Dexamethasone & Capizzi Methotrexate Patients => 10 Years Old87.4
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (IM) < 10 Years98.1
Prednisone, Capizzi Methotrexate <10 Years93.3
Prednisone, Capizzi Methotrexate >= 10 Years90.2
Prednisone and High Dose Methotrexate < 10 Yrs Old94.5
Prednisone and High Dose Methotrexate >=10 Years90.5
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (IM) >= 10 Years91.6
Prednisone, Capizzi Methotrexate (Down's Syndrome)78.3
Dexamethasone, Capizzi Methotrexate Down Syndrome (Non Random)25.0

[back to top]

Correlation of Early Marrow Response Status With MRD Negative.

Bone marrow status is defined as: M1: < 5% lymphoblasts; M2: 5-25% lymphoblasts; M3: > 25% lymphoblasts. Bone marrow MRD status is defined as positive with >= 0.1 detectable leukemia cells, and negative with < 0.1 detectable leukemia cells. (NCT00075725)
Timeframe: Day 29

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Dexamethasone and Capizzi Methotrexate Patients < 10 Years182
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (Non Randomly Assigned)72
Dexamethasone & Capizzi Methotrexate Patients => 10 Years Old198
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (IM) < 10 Years188
Prednisone, Capizzi Methotrexate <10 Years195
Prednisone, Capezzi Methotrexate >= 10 Years471
Prednisone and High Dose Methotrexate < 10 Yrs Old190
Prednisone and High Dose Methotrexate >=10 Years479
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (IM) >= 10 Years208
Prednisone, Capezzi Methotrexate (Down's Syndrome)25
Dexamethasone, Capizzi Methotrexate Down Syndrome (Non Random)3
Prednisone and High Dose Methotrexate (Non Randomly Assigned)18

[back to top]

Correlation of Early Marrow Response Status With MRD Positive.

Bone marrow status is defined as: M1: < 5% lymphoblasts; M2: 5-25% lymphoblasts; M3: > 25% lymphoblasts. Bone marrow MRD status is defined as positive with >= 0.1 detectable leukemia cells, and negative with < 0.1 detectable leukemia cells. (NCT00075725)
Timeframe: Day 29

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Dexamethasone and Capizzi Methotrexate Patients < 10 Years26
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (Non Randomly Assigned)12
Dexamethasone & Capizzi Methotrexate Patients => 10 Years Old43
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (IM) < 10 Years14
Prednisone, Capizzi Methotrexate <10 Years16
Prednisone, Capezzi Methotrexate >= 10 Years95
Prednisone and High Dose Methotrexate < 10 Yrs Old17
Prednisone and High Dose Methotrexate >=10 Years98
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (IM) >= 10 Years39
Prednisone, Capezzi Methotrexate (Down's Syndrome)3
Dexamethasone, Capizzi Methotrexate Down Syndrome (Non Random)3
Prednisone and High Dose Methotrexate (Non Randomly Assigned)3

[back to top]

Correlation of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative With Event Free Survival (EFS).

Bone marrow MRD status is defined as negative with < 0.1 detectable leukemia cells. (NCT00075725)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dexamethasone and Capizzi Methotrexate Patients < 10 Years86.4
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (Non Randomly Assigned)93.6
Dexamethasone & Capizzi Methotrexate Patients => 10 Years Old80.5
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (IM) < 10 Years93.1
Prednisone, Capizzi Methotrexate <10 Years86.5
Prednisone, Capezzi Methotrexate >= 10 Years83.4
Prednisone and High Dose Methotrexate < 10 Yrs Old84.2
Prednisone and High Dose Methotrexate >=10 Years83.9
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (IM) >= 10 Years85.3
Prednisone, Capezzi Methotrexate (Down's Syndrome)74.4
Dexamethasone, Capizzi Methotrexate Down Syndrome (Non Random)25

[back to top]

Correlation of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Positive With Event Free Survival (EFS)

Bone marrow MRD status is defined as positive with >= 0.1 detectable leukemia cells. (NCT00075725)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dexamethasone and Capizzi Methotrexate Patients < 10 Years66.5
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (Non Randomly Assigned)43.3
Dexamethasone & Capizzi Methotrexate Patients => 10 Years Old35.4
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (IM) < 10 Years80
Prednisone, Capizzi Methotrexate <10 Years34.7
Prednisone, Capizzi Methotrexate >= 10 Years39
Prednisone and High Dose Methotrexate < 10 Yrs Old55
Prednisone and High Dose Methotrexate >=10 Years47.8
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (IM) >= 10 Years49.4

[back to top]

Correlation of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Positive With Overall Survival (OS)

Bone marrow MRD status is defined as positive with >= 0.1 detectable leukemia cells, and negative with < 0.1 detectable leukemia cells. (NCT00075725)
Timeframe: 5 Years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dexamethasone and Capizzi Methotrexate Patients < 10 Years79.2
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (Non Randomly Assigned)69.9
Dexamethasone & Capizzi Methotrexate Patients => 10 Years Old65.6
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (IM) < 10 Years86.2
Prednisone, Capizzi Methotrexate <10 Years93.8
Prednisone, Capizzi Methotrexate >= 10 Years63.1
Predisone and High Dose Methotrexate < 10 Yrs Old84.2
Prednisone and High Dose Methotrexate >=10 Years73.6
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (IM) >= 10 Years74.6

[back to top]

Comparison of the Increase in Cure Rate of High Risk ALL Without Causing More Serious Side Effects Between Interventions

Event Free Probability. (NCT00075725)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dexamethasone and Capizzi Methotrexate Patients < 10 Years83.2
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (Non Randomly Assigned)81.6
Dexamethasone & Capizzi Methotrexate Patients => 10 Years Old69.1
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (IM) < 10 Years91.2
Prednisone, Capizzi Methotrexate <10 Years82.1
Prednisone, Capezzi Methotrexate >= 10 Years73.5
Predisone and High Dose Methotrexate < 10 Yrs Old80.8
Prenisone and High Dose Methotrexate >=10 Years75.8
Dexamethasone, High Dose Methotrexate (IM) >= 10 Years77.0
Prenisone, Capezzi Methotrexate (Down's Syndrome)61.8
Dexamethasone, Capizzi Methotrexate Down Syndrome (Non Random)44.4

[back to top]

Early Marrow Status (EMS) by MRD Status End Induction (Day 29)

Early Marrow Status defined as M1 versus M2/M3 marrow is correlated with MRD (Positive vs. Negative) (NCT00103285)
Timeframe: Early Marrow Status at Day 15, MRD Status at Day 29 of therapy.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
All Patients for Induction, MRD Negative4378
All Patients for Induction, MRD Positive258

[back to top]

Event-Free Survival (EFS) for Low MRD (Negative) Subjects by Genetic Subset (TEL/Trisomy Positive vs Negative)

Event-free probability where EFS is defined as time from randomization to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, death) or date of last contact for patients who are event-free. (NCT00103285)
Timeframe: 6 years

InterventionPercent probability (Number)
Group 1-SR-low ALL, Arm I-combination Chemotherapy95.22
Group 2-SR-avg ALL, Arm I-combination Chemotherapy88.52

[back to top]

Event-free Survival (EFS) for SR-High Patients.

Event Free Probability where EFS time is defined as time from randomization to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, death) or date of last contact for patients who are event-free. (NCT00103285)
Timeframe: 6 years

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
Group 3-SR-high ALL, Combination Chemotherapy85.58

[back to top]

Event-free Survival (EFS) for SR-Low Patients

Event Free Probability where EFS time is defined as time from randomization to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, death) or date of last contact for patients who are event-free. (NCT00103285)
Timeframe: 6 years

InterventionPercent probability (Number)
SR-low ALL, Arm I-combination Chemotherapy95.22
SR-low ALL, Arm II-combination Chemotherapy93.96

[back to top]

Event-Free Survival Probability According to MRD Status End Induction (Day 29)

Event-Free survival by Day 29 MRD status (negative vs positive), Event Free Probability (time from study entry to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, death) or date of last contact for patients who are event-free. (NCT00103285)
Timeframe: MRD at Day 29 of therapy

InterventionPercent Probability (Number)
Induction Therapy, MRD Negative91.39
Induction Therapy, MRD Positive79.86

[back to top]

Overall Survival Probability (OS) According to Induction Day 29 MRD Status

Overall survival by Day 29 MRD status (negative vs positive), Overall survival defined as time from study entry to death or date of last contact for patients who are alive. (NCT00103285)
Timeframe: Overall Survival Probability of 6 years

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
Induction Therapy, MRD Negative97.07
Induction Therapy, MRD Positive90.47

[back to top]

Event-free Survival (EFS) for SR-Average ALL Patients

EFS for SR-Average with standard and Intensified Consolidation. Event Free Probability where EFS time is defined as time from randomization to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, death) or date of last contact for patients who are event-free. (NCT00103285)
Timeframe: 6 years

,
Interventionpercent probability (Number)
Standard and Intensified therapy
Group 2-SR-avg ALL, Arm III-combination Chemotherapy88.34
Group 2-SR-avg ALL, Arm IV-combination Chemotherapy90.51

[back to top]

Event-free Survival (EFS) for SR-Average ALL Patients

EFS for SR-Average with standard and Intensified Consolidation. Event Free Probability where EFS time is defined as time from randomization to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, death) or date of last contact for patients who are event-free. (NCT00103285)
Timeframe: 6 years

,
Interventionpercent probability (Number)
Standard and Intensified therapyStandard therapy
Group 2-SR-avg ALL, Arm I-combination Chemotherapy83.8287.41
Group 2-SR-avg ALL, Arm II-combination Chemotherapy88.8988.29

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Disease-free Survival (DFS) for Randomized Methotrexate T-ALL Cohort (Arm I + Arm II vs. Arm III + Arm IV)

Disease Free Probability where DFS time is defined as time from randomization end of induction to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, death) or date of last contact for patients who are event-free. (NCT00408005)
Timeframe: 4 years from randomization at the end of induction

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
ARM I and ARM II (Combination Chemotherapy)91.45
ARM III and ARM IV (Combination Chemotherapy)85.78

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival (DFS) for Randomized Methotrexate T-ALL Cohort (Arm I vs. Arm II vs. Arm III vs. Arm IV)

Disease-free survival defined as time from randomization end of induction to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, remission death) or date of last contact for those who are event-free. (NCT00408005)
Timeframe: 4 years from randomization at the end of induction

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
ARM I (Combination Chemotherapy)91.76
ARM II (Combination Chemotherapy)90.53
ARM III (Combination Chemotherapy)86.06
ARM IV (Combination Chemotherapy)84.89

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival (DFS) for Randomized Nelarabine T-ALL Cohort (Arm I + Arm III vs. Arm II + Arm IV)

Disease Free Probability where DFS time is defined as time from randomization end of induction to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, death) or date of last contact for patients who are event (NCT00408005)
Timeframe: 4 years from randomization at the end of induction

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
ARM I and ARM III (Combination Chemotherapy)82.96
ARM II and ARM IV (Combination Chemotherapy)88.30

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival (DFS) for Randomized Nelarabine T-ALL Cohort (Arm I vs. Arm II vs. Arm III vs. Arm IV)

Disease Free Probability where DFS time is defined as time from randomization end of induction to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, death) or date of last contact for patients who are event-free. (NCT00408005)
Timeframe: 4 years from randomization at the end of induction

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
ARM I (Combination Chemotherapy)89.01
ARM II (Combination Chemotherapy)90.53
ARM III (Combination Chemotherapy)78.07
ARM IV (Combination Chemotherapy)86.46

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of CNS Relapse for T-ALL by Risk Group

Cumulative incidence of CNS relapse adjusting for DFS events, was calculated using the method Gray et. al. High risk patients receive cranial radiation and low risk patients receive no cranial radiation. (NCT00408005)
Timeframe: 4 years from randomization at the end of induction

,
Interventionpercent probability (Number)
Intermediate RiskHigh Risk
ARM II (Combination Chemotherapy)1.080
ARM IV (Combination Chemotherapy)0.853.45

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of CNS Relapse for T-ALL by Risk Group

Cumulative incidence of CNS relapse adjusting for DFS events, was calculated using the method Gray et. al. High risk patients receive cranial radiation and low risk patients receive no cranial radiation. (NCT00408005)
Timeframe: 4 years from randomization at the end of induction

,
Interventionpercent probability (Number)
Low RiskIntermediate RiskHigh Risk
ARM I (Combination Chemotherapy)1.851.163.64
ARM III (Combination Chemotherapy)1.929.16.52

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival (DFS) for T-cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (T-LLy) Cohort

Disease Free Probability where DFS time is defined as time from randomization end of induction to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, death) or date of last contact for patients who are event-free. (NCT00408005)
Timeframe: 4 years from end of induction

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
High RiskInduction Failure
ARM II (Combination Chemotherapy)85.0100

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival (DFS) for T-cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (T-LLy) Cohort

Disease Free Probability where DFS time is defined as time from randomization end of induction to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, death) or date of last contact for patients who are event-free. (NCT00408005)
Timeframe: 4 years from end of induction

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
Standard RiskHigh Risk
ARM I (Combination Chemotherapy)87.485.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission at the End of Induction

Complete Remission (CR) rate; where CR is defined as M1 marrow (< 5% lymphoblasts in the bone marrow) (NCT00671034)
Timeframe: End of induction (Day 29)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)92.4
Arm II (Calaspargase Pegol 2500)97.6
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)94.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Event-free Survival (EFS)

Percentage of participants who were event free. Event Free Probability defined as time from randomization at study entry to first event (induction failure, induction death, relapse, second malignant neoplasm, remission death) or date of last contact for subjects who are event-free. (NCT00671034)
Timeframe: 5 Years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)72.35
Arm II (Calaspargase Pegol 2500)80.8
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)79.34

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)<0.01% at the End of Induction

Percentage of participants with Negative MRD (MRD<0.01%). (NCT00671034)
Timeframe: End of induction (Day 29)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)65.2
Arm II (Calaspargase Pegol 2500)81
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)72.5

[back to top]

Asparaginase Level

The proportion of patients with an asparaginase level of at least 0.1 IU/mL and the proportion with at least 0.4 IU/mL on Days 4, 15, 22 and 29 of Induction compared to Oncaspar (NCT00671034)
Timeframe: Days 4, 15, 22 and 29 of Induction

,,
Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Level at least 0.1 IU/mL day 4Level at least 0.1 IU/mL day 15Level at least 0.1 IU/mL day 22Level at least 0.1 IU/mL day 29Level at least 0.4 IU/mL day 4Level at least 0.4 IU/mL day 15Level at least 0.4 IU/mL day 22Level at least 0.4 IU/mL day 29
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)098.498.294.9075.837.513.6
Arm II (Calaspargase Pegol 2500)010010095.0095.062.527.5
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)010095.128.6093.014.60

[back to top]

Pharmacodynamics (PD)

Plasma Asparaginase Concentration During consolidation and induction. (NCT00671034)
Timeframe: Day 29 of consolidation and induction

,,
InterventionmIU/mL (Median)
Plasma Asparaginase Concentration- ConsolidationPlasma Asparaginase Concentration- Induction
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)575.9271.6
Arm II (Calaspargase Pegol 2500)617.2339.6
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)562.172.8

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (PK) (Half-life of SC-PEG E. Coli L-asparaginase (EZN-2285) Compared to Pegaspargase During Induction and Consolidation Therapy)

Mean half-life of plasma asparaginase during consolidation and Induction; half-life is defined as the time taken for drug concentration to decrease by half. (NCT00671034)
Timeframe: Post Day 29 of Induction and Post Day 22 of Consolidation

,,
Interventionhours (Mean)
Asparaginase half-life during ConsolidationAsparaginase half-life during Induction
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)415.8305.1
Arm II ( Calaspargase Pegol 2500)355.9321.5
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)117.2126.9

[back to top]

Plasma and CSF Concentrations of Asparagine in ug/ml

The plasma and CSF concentrations of asparagine in ug/ml after administration of EZN-2285 compared to Oncaspar. (NCT00671034)
Timeframe: 25 Days Post-dose (Day 29)

,,
Interventionug/mL (Mean)
CSF asparagine concentration (ug/mL)Plasma asparagine concentration (ug/mL)
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)0.20.2
Arm II (Calaspargase Pegol 2500)0.190.25
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)0.260.83

[back to top]

Toxicities During Post Induction Intensification Therapy (All Grades)

The calculation of AE incidence will be based on the number of patients per AE category. For each patient who has multiple AEs classified to the same category, that patient will be tabulated under the worst toxicity grade for that AE category. The incidence of AEs will be tabulated by treatment arm and by organ class. Special attention will be paid to hypersensitivity, pancreatitis, coagulopathy, infection, neurologic dysfunction and thromboembolic events. (NCT00671034)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Alergic Reaction - ConsolidationAlergic Reaction - Delayed Intensification IAlergic Reaction - Interim Maintenance ICNS - ConsolidationCNS - Delayed Intensification ICNS - Interim Maintenance IHyperbilirubinemia - ConsolidationHyperbilirubinemia - Delayed Intensification IHyperbilirubinemia - Interim Maintenance IHyperglycemia - ConsolidationHyperglycemia - Delayed Intensification IHyperglycemia - Interim Maintenance IHyperlipidemia - ConsolidationHyperlipidemia - Delayed Intensification IHyperlipidemia - Interim Maintenance I% patients w/INR increase - Consolidation% pts w/INR increase - Delayed Intensification I% patients w/INR increase - Interim Maintenance IPancreatitis - ConsolidationPancreatitis -Delayed Intensification IPancreatitis - Interim Maintenance I% pts w/prolongation of APT time - Consolidation% pts w/prolongation APT time -Delayed Intension I%pts w/prolongation APT time-Interim maintenance IThrombosis - ConsolidationThrombosis - Delayed Intensification IThrombosis - Interim Maintenance I
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)20.44.40.00.00.00.053.128.941.344.944.434.82.02.22.26.16.72.210.22.22.28.28.96.50.02.20.0
Arm II (Calaspargase Pegol 2500)27.30.00.00.03.80.045.538.527.642.461.544.83.00.03.43.03.80.06.17.73.49.126.96.90.00.00.0
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)23.30.02.10.02.60.030.210.533.346.536.833.37.00.02.67.00.02.67.00.02.67.018.47.72.30.00.0

[back to top]

Immunogenicity

Number of Patients with Positive Immunogenicity tests (NCT00671034)
Timeframe: 25 Days Post-dose (Day 29)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Calaspargase Pegol 2100)2
Arm II (Calaspargase Pegol 2500)2
Arm III (Pegaspargase 2500)4

[back to top]

AALL08P1 Safety Outcome

Percentage of Group B (High Risk-High) patients taking less than 49 weeks from day 1 of consolidation to day 1 of maintenance therapy. Only Group B analyzed since this is prespecified in protocol. (NCT00866307)
Timeframe: Consolidation through Delayed Intensification

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group B (High Risk-High)50.0

[back to top]

AALL08P1 Feasibility Outcome

Percentage of Group B (High Risk-High) patients that tolerate at least 8 of the 12-14 total doses of pegaspargase during Consolidation, Interim Maintenance, and Delayed Intensification periods. Only Grp B analyzed since this is prespecified in protocol. (NCT00866307)
Timeframe: Consolidation through Delayed Intensification

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group B (High Risk-High)53.3

[back to top]

Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Right

Strength in the right ankle dorsiflexors averaged over two measurements. Age and gender standardized mean and standard deviation for each randomization group will be reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 2.4 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 4 Weeks-1.12
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 12 Weeks-0.02

[back to top]

DFS for SR Down Syndrome Patients With Standardized Treatment and Enhanced Supportive Care

DFS is calculated as the time from end of Induction to first event (relapse, second malignancy, remission death) or date of last contact. The 5-year DFS and 95% confidence interval for these patients will be estimated. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 5.1 years

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
Standard Risk With Down Syndrome89.77

[back to top]

DFS in Average Risk (AR) Patients Based on the Pulse Frequency Randomization

DFS is calculated as the time from randomization at the end of interim maintenance II to first event (relapse, second malignancy, remission death) or date of last contact. Five year DFS estimates will be calculated from the point of randomization for both groups. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 5.7 years

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 4 Weeks94.10
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 12 Weeks95.13

[back to top]

DFS in Low Risk (LR) Patients Based on Randomization to 1 of 2 Low-intensity Regimens

DFS is calculated as the time from randomization at the end of Induction to first event (relapse, second malignancy, remission death) or date of last contact. Five year DFS estimates will be calculated from the point of randomization for both groups. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 5.1 years

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
B-ALL Low Risk Arm I (LR-M)98.75
B-ALL Low Risk Arm II (LR-C)98.50

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival (DFS) in Average Risk (AR) Patients Based on the Methotrexate Dose Randomization

DFS is calculated as the time from randomization at the end of interim maintenance II to first event (relapse, second malignancy, remission death) or date of last contact. Five year DFS estimates will be calculated from the point of randomization for both groups. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 5.7 years

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
B-ALL Average Risk: MTX 20 mg/m^2/Week Starting Dose95.05
B-ALL Average Risk: MTX 40 mg/m^2/Week Starting Dose94.17

[back to top]

Event Free Survival (EFS) for B-LLy Patients

EFS is calculated as the Time from study enrollment to first event (induction failure, relapse, second malignancy, remission death) or date of last contact. The 5-year EFS and 95% confidence interval for these patients will be estimated. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
B-LLy94.54

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) for B-LLy Patients

OS is calculated as the time from study enrollment to death or date of last contact. The 5-year OS and 95% confidence interval for these patients will be estimated. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
B-LLy93.97

[back to top]

Sample Collection of Central Path Review Slides in B-LLy Patients

Percent of B-LLy patients who had adequate/usable samples of samples collected will be reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: Up to 1 month

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
B-LLy89.7

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Maintenance Cycle 4: Emotional

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the emotional subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated for each group with means and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 1.7 years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 4 Weeks-0.80
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 12 Weeks-0.89

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Maintenance Cycle 4: Physical

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the physical subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated for each group with means and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 1.7 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 4 Weeks-0.62
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 12 Weeks-0.64

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Maintenance Cycle 4: Social Functioning

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the social functioning subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated for each group with means and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 1.7 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 4 Weeks-0.16
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 12 Weeks-0.25

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Emotional

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the emotional subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated for each group with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 2.4 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 4 Weeks-0.72
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 12 Weeks-0.77

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Physical

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the physical subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated for each group with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 2.4 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 4 Weeks-0.64
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 12 Weeks-0.67

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Social Functioning

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the social functioning subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated for each group with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 2.4 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 4 Weeks-0.27
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 12 Weeks-0.34

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Consolidation Therapy: Emotional

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the emotional subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 2 Months

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-1.21

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Consolidation Therapy: Physical

Age and gender standardized Quality of life, measured by the physical subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 2 Months

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-1.44

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Consolidation Therapy: Social Functioning

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the social functioning subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 2 Months

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.42

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 1: Emotional

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the emotional subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.86

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 1: Physical

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the physical subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 1 Year

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.59

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 1: Social Functioning

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the social functioning subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 1 Year

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.19

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 4: Emotional

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the emotional subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 1.7 years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.84

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 4: Physical

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the physical subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 1.7 years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.63

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 4: Social Functioning

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the social functioning subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 1.7 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.20

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Emotional

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the emotional subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 2.5 years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.74

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Physical

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the physical subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 2.4 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.66

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in AR Patients Overall at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Social Functioning

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the social functioning subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 2.4 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.30

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in Boy AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Therapy: Emotional

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the emotional subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated for each group with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 3.2 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 4 Weeks-0.71
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 12 Weeks-0.51

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in Boy AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Therapy: Physical

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the physical subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated for each group with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 3.2 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 4 Weeks-0.85
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 12 Weeks-0.47

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in Boy AR Patients by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Therapy: Social Functioning

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the social functioning subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated for each group with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 3.2 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 4 Weeks-0.46
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 12 Weeks-0.33

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in Boy AR Patients Overall at End of Therapy: Emotional

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the emotional subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Genetic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 3.2 years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.62

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in Boy AR Patients Overall at End of Therapy: Physical

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the physical subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 3.2 years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.67

[back to top]

Burden of Therapy in Boy AR Patients Overall at End of Therapy: Social Functioning

Age standardized Quality of life, measured by the Social functioning subscale of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL), will be calculated with mean and standard deviation reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 3.2 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.40

[back to top]

Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL 12 Months Post Therapy: Left

Strength in the left ankle dorsiflexors averaged over two measurements. Age and gender standardized mean and standard deviation for the cohort will be reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 4.2 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-1.19

[back to top]

Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL 12 Months Post Therapy: Right

Strength in the right ankle dorsiflexors averaged over two measurements. Age and gender standardized mean and standard deviation for the cohort will be reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 4.2 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-1.12

[back to top]

Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL at End of Consolidation Therapy-Left

Strength in the left ankle dorsiflexors averaged over two measurements. Age and gender standardized mean and standard deviation for the cohort will be reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 2 Months

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.84

[back to top]

Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL at End of Consolidation Therapy-Right

Strength in the right ankle dorsiflexors averaged over two measurements. Age and gender standardized mean and standard deviation for the cohort will be reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 2 Months

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.87

[back to top]

Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL at End of Maintenance Cycle 1: Left

Strength in the left ankle dorsiflexors averaged over two measurements. Age and gender standardized mean and standard deviation for the cohort will be reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 1 Year

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.36

[back to top]

Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL at End of Maintenance Cycle 1: Right

Strength in the right ankle dorsiflexors averaged over two measurements. Age and gender standardized mean and standard deviation for the cohort will be reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 1 Year

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.39

[back to top]

Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Left

Strength in the left ankle dorsiflexors averaged over two measurements. Age and gender standardized mean and standard deviation for the cohort will be reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 2.4 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.28

[back to top]

Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Right

Strength in the right ankle dorsiflexors averaged over two measurements. Age and gender standardized mean and standard deviation for the cohort will be reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 2.4 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk-0.27

[back to top]

Characterize Vincristine-associated Neuropathy in Children Undergoing Therapy for Average Risk (AR) ALL by Vincristine Pulse Frequency Randomization Groups (4 Week vs. 12 Week) at End of Maintenance Cycle 7 (Boys)/End of Therapy (Girls): Left

Strength in the left ankle dorsiflexors averaged over two measurements. Age and gender standardized mean and standard deviation for each randomization group will be reported. (NCT01190930)
Timeframe: 2.4 Years

InterventionZ-Score (Mean)
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 4 Weeks-1.19
B-ALL Average Risk: VCR/DEX Pulse Every 12 Weeks0.21

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival (DFS) of High-risk (HR) and Intermediate-risk (IR) Relapse Patients

DFS rates of HR and IR relapse B-ALL patients who are randomized following Induction Block 1 chemotherapy to receive either two intensive chemotherapy blocks or two 5-week blocks of blinatumomab (HR/IR Randomization). DFS is calculated as the time from randomization to date of first event (treatment failure, relapse, second malignancy, remission death) or date of last contact. Two-year DFS estimates will be calculated from date of randomization for both Arm A and Arm B. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. (NCT02101853)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years from date of randomization

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (HR and IR Control)39.04
Arm B (HR and IR Blinatumomab)54.44

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival (DFS) of Low Risk (LR) Relapse Patients

DFS rates of LR relapse B-ALL patients who are randomized following Block 1 chemotherapy to receive either chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy plus blinatumomab (LR Randomization). DFS is calculated as the time from randomization to date of first event (relapse, second malignancy, remission death) or date of last contact. Three-year DFS estimates will be calculated from date of randomization for both Arm C and Arm D. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. (NCT02101853)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years from date of randomization

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm C (LR Control)58.94
Arm D (LR Blinatumomab)67.00

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) of HR and IR Relapse Patients

OS rates of HR and IR relapse B-ALL patients who are randomized following Induction Block 1 chemotherapy to receive either two intensive chemotherapy blocks or two 5-week blocks of blinatumomab (HR/IR Randomization). OS is calculated as the time from randomization to date of death or date of last contact. Two-year OS estimates will be calculated from date of randomization for both Arm A and Arm B. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. (NCT02101853)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years from date of randomization

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (HR and IR Control)58.40
Arm B (HR and IR Blinatumomab)71.33

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) of LR Relapse Patients

OS rates of LR relapse B-ALL patients who are randomized following Block 1 chemotherapy to receive either chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy plus blinatumomab (LR Randomization). OS is calculated as the time from randomization to date of death or date of last contact. Three-year OS estimates will be calculated from date of randomization for both Arm C and Arm D. Two-sided 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. (NCT02101853)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years from date of randomization

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm C (LR Control)88.29
Arm D (LR Blinatumomab)90.37

[back to top]

EFS for Very High Risk (VHR) T-ALL Patients Treated With High Risk (HR) Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (BFM) Intensification Blocks Who Become Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative and Those Who Remain MRD Positive at the End of HR Block 3

EFS will be calculated as time from the end of the three high-risk blocks of therapy to first event (relapse, second malignancy, remission death) or date of last contact. (NCT02112916)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
VHR T-ALL MRD Undetectable25.0
VHR T-ALL MRD Detectable88.9

[back to top]

EFS for Very High Risk (VHR) T-LLy Patients Treated With HR Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (BFM) Intensification Blocks Who Have Complete or Partial Remission and Those Who do Not Respond

EFS for very high risk (VHR) T-LLy patients treated with HR Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (BFM) intensification blocks who have complete or partial remission and those who do not respond (NCT02112916)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
VHR T-LLy (CR/PR)0

[back to top]

Event-free Survival (EFS) for Modified Augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster Backbone With or Without Bortezomib in All Randomized Patients

EFS is calculated as time from randomization at study entry to first event (induction failure, induction death, relapse, second malignancy, remission death) or date of last contact. Three-year EFS rates will be calculated for both groups. (NCT02112916)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (Combination Chemotherapy)81.7
Arm B (Combination Chemotherapy, Bortezomib)85.1

[back to top]

Toxicity Rates Associated With Modified Standard Therapy, Including Dexamethasone and Additional Pegaspargase

Percentage of patients who experienced Grade 3 or higher Toxicity Assessed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (NCT02112916)
Timeframe: 3 years from start of therapy by patient

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Total Patients78.0

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence Rates of Isolated Central Nervous System (CNS) Relapse for SR and IR T-ALL Patients on the Non-bortezomib Containing Arm on This Study (no CRT) and Similar Patients on AALL0434 (Receive CRT)

Cumulative incidence of isolated CNS relapse adjusting for competing risks using the method of: Gray R, A class of K-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Stat 1141:1154, 1988 (NCT02112916)
Timeframe: 3 years

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Isolated CNS RelapseIsolated Bone Marrow RelapseCombined Bone Marrow Relapse
AALL0434 T-ALL Patients2.23.01.8
AALL1231 T-ALL Patients3.61.41.3

[back to top]

EFS for Standard (SR) and Intermediate Risk (IR) T-ALL Patients on the Non-bortezomib Containing Arm on This Study (no Cranial Radiation Therapy [CRT]) and Similar Patients on AALL0434 (Received CRT)

EFS is calculated as time from randomization at study entry to first event (induction failure, induction death, relapse, second malignancy, remission death) or date of last contact. (NCT02112916)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
AALL1231 T-ALL Patients88.3
AALL0434 T-ALL Patients88.8

[back to top]

Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 1 Prior to First Course of Azacitidine

Will calculate the percentage of CpG site methylation for all patients before the first course of azacitidine. Mean and standard deviation will be reported. (NCT02828358)
Timeframe: Week 6, Day 1 (Following the induction phase (35 days), the first course of Azacitidine began around Week 6 of therapy)

InterventionPercentage of CpG methylation (Mean)
KMT2A-Rearranged78.17

[back to top]

Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 1 Prior to Second Course of Azacitidine

Will calculate the percentage of CpG site methylation for all patients before the second course of azacitidine. Mean and standard deviation will be reported. (NCT02828358)
Timeframe: Week 13, Day 1 (Following induction phase (5 weeks), the first course of Azacitidine (1 week), and consolidation (6 weeks), the second course of Azacitidine began around Week 13 of therapy)

InterventionPercentage of CpG methylation (Mean)
KMT2A-Rearranged76.5

[back to top]

Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 5 of First Course of Azacitidine

Will calculate the percentage of CpG site methylation for all patients after the first course of azacitidine. Mean and standard deviation will be reported. (NCT02828358)
Timeframe: Week 6, Day 5 (Following the induction phase (35 days), the first course of Azacitidine began around Week 6 of therapy)

InterventionPercentage of CpG methylation (Mean)
KMT2A-Rearranged75.54

[back to top]

Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 5 of Second Course of Azacitidine

Will calculate the percentage of CpG site methylation for all patients after the second course of azacitidine. Mean and standard deviation will be reported. (NCT02828358)
Timeframe: Week 13, Day 5 (Following induction phase (5 weeks), the first course of Azacitidine (1 week), and consolidation (6 weeks), the second course of Azacitidine began around Week 13 of therapy)

InterventionPercentage of CpG methylation (Mean)
KMT2A-Rearranged74.52

[back to top]

Tolerability of Azacitidine in Combination With Interfant-06 Standard Chemotherapy in Evaluable Infant Patients With Newly Diagnosed ALL With KMT2A Gene Rearrangement (KMT2A-R). KMT2A Gene Rearrangement (KMT2A-R)

Proportion of KMT2A-Rearranged patients treated with azacitidine with Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) from the first course of azacitidine administration up to fourth course of azacitidine administration. (NCT02828358)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
KMT2A-Rearranged6.45

[back to top]