Page last updated: 2024-12-04

bicalutamide

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

bicalutamide: approved for treatment of advanced prostate cancer [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

N-[4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-3-[(4-fluorophenyl)sulfonyl]-2-hydroxy-2-methylpropanamide : A member of the class of (trifluoromethyl)benzenes that is 4-amino-2-(trifluoromethyl)benzonitrile in which one of the amino hydrogens is substituted by a 3-[(4-fluorophenyl)sulfonyl]-2-hydroxy-2-methylpropanoyl group. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

bicalutamide : A racemate comprising of equal amounts of (R)-bicalutamide and (S)-bicalutamide. It is an oral non-steroidal antiandrogen used in the treatment of prostate cancer and hirsutism. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID2375
CHEMBL ID409
CHEBI ID144093
CHEBI ID91617
SCHEMBL ID3611
MeSH IDM0151653

Synonyms (169)

Synonym
AC-4232
HMS3393B13
AB00639963-08
AB00639963-09
gtpl2863
raffolutil
nsc-722665
nsc722665
propanamide,
casodex
ici 176334
brn 5364666
ici-176334
(+-)-4'-cyano-alpha,alpha,alpha-trifluoro-3-((p-fluorophenyl)sulfonyl)-2-methyl-m-lactotoluidide
propanamide, n-(4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-3-((4-fluorophenyl)sulfonyl)-2-hydroxy-2-methyl-, (+-)-
MLS001424047
90357-06-5
bicalutamide
C08160
smr000466329
MLS000759437
cpd000466329
DB01128
bicalutamide (jan/usp/inn)
casodex (tn)
D00961
NCGC00167977-01
4'-cyano-3-(4-fluorophenylsulfonyl)-2-hydroxy-2-methyl-3'-(trifluoromethyl)propionanilide
cosudex
chembl409 ,
bdbm18525
n-[4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-3-[(4-fluorobenzene)sulfonyl]-2-hydroxy-2-methylpropanamide
HMS2089N12
HMS2051B13
NCGC00167977-02
ici 176,334
nsc-759816
ici176,334-1
FT-0663100
n-[4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-3-(4-fluorophenyl)sulfonyl-2-hydroxy-2-methylpropanamide
CHEBI:144093
n-[4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-3-[(4-fluorophenyl)sulfonyl]-2-hydroxy-2-methylpropanamide
A803039
n-[4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-3-(4-fluorophenyl)sulfonyl-2-methyl-2-oxidanyl-propanamide
A843528
n-(4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-3-((4-fluorophenyl)sulfonyl)-2-hydroxy-2-methyl-n-phenylpropanamide
NCGC00167977-03
HMS3263M13
propanamide, n-[4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-3-[(4-fluorophenyl)sulfonyl]-2-hydroxy-2-methyl-
ccris 8728
hsdb 7655
bicalutamide [usan:usp:inn:ban]
nsc 759816
unii-a0z3nau9dp
a0z3nau9dp ,
dtxcid00209197
dtxsid2022678 ,
cas-90357-06-5
tox21_303560
NCGC00257459-01
tox21_112488
nsc759816
pharmakon1600-01504827
BCP9000408
BICALUTAMIDE - CASODEX
kalumid
calutide
HMS2232H03
CCG-100951
HY-14249
CS-1296
BCPP000337
FT-0631069
FT-0618286
bicalutamide (cdx)
LP01026
4-cyano-3-trifluoromethyl-n-(3-p-fluorophenylsulfonyl-2-hydroxy-2-methylpropionyl)aniline
S1190
AKOS015895073
HMS3372K05
bicalutamide [usp monograph]
bicalutamide [usan]
bicalutamide [ep monograph]
bicalutamide [mi]
bicalutamide [usp-rs]
bicalutamide [who-dd]
propanamide, n-(4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-3-((4-fluorophenyl)sulfonyl)-2-hydroxy-2-methyl-, (+/-)-
bicalutamide [usp impurity]
bicalutamide [hsdb]
bicalutamide [jan]
(+/-)-4'-cyano-.alpha.,.alpha.,.alpha.-trifluoro-3-((p-fluorophenyl)sulfonyl)-2-methyl-m-lactotoluidide
bicalutamide [inn]
bicalutamide [orange book]
bicalutamide [vandf]
bicalutamide [mart.]
CCG-222330
CCG-220876
AB00639963-06
n-[4-cyano-3-trifluoromethyl-phenyl]-3-[4-fluorophenyl-sulfonyl]-2-hydroxy-2-methyl-propionamide
4'-cyano-3-[(4- fluorophenyl)sulfonyl]-2-hydroxy-2-methyl-3'-trifluoromethylpropionanilide
4'-cyano-3-[(4-fluorophenyl)sulfonyl]-2-hydroxy-2-methyl-3'-trifluoromethylpropionanilide
n-[4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-3-[(4-fluorophenyl)sulfonyl]-2-hydroxy-2-methylpropionamide
B3206
NC00201
SCHEMBL3611
KS-1161 ,
NCGC00261711-01
tox21_501026
n-(4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-3-((4-fluorophenyl)sulfonyl)-2-hydroxy-2-methylpropanamide
AB00639963_10
mfcd00869971
bicalutamide (cdx), >=98% (hplc), powder
EX-A962
SR-01000759410-5
SR-01000759410-4
sr-01000759410
bicalutamide, united states pharmacopeia (usp) reference standard
CHEBI:91617
HMS3654K18
bicalutamide, european pharmacopoeia (ep) reference standard
bicalutamide for system suitability, european pharmacopoeia (ep) reference standard
bicalutamide, pharmaceutical secondary standard; certified reference material
HMS3714P13
NCGC00167977-09
bicalutamide, british pharmacopoeia (bp) reference standard
SW197581-4
n-(4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)
-2-hydroxy-2-methylpropanamide
-3-(4-fluorophenylsulfonyl)
n-(4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-3-(4-fluorophenylsulfonyl)-2-hydroxy-2-methylpropanamide
bicalutamide (casodex)
BCP02110
Q1988832
BRD-A29485665-001-03-7
SB17301
SDCCGSBI-0633779.P001
NCGC00167977-20
AMY33430
racemic bicalutamide
4'-cyano-alpha,alpha,alpha-trifuloro-3-((p-fluorophenyl)sulfonyl)-2-methyl-m-lactotoluidide
binabic
(rs)-bicalutamide
bicalutamide (ep monograph)
bicalutamidum
rac-n-(4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-3-((4-fluorophenyl)sulfonyl)-2-hydroxy-2-methylpropanamide
bicatlon
bicalutamida
(+-)-4'-cyano-alpha,alpha,alpha-trifluoro-3-((p- fluorophenyl)sulfonyl)-2-methyl-m-lactotoluidide
bicalox
(rs)-4'-cyano-alpha',alpha',alpha',-trifluoro-3-(4-fluorophenylsulphonyl)-2-hydroxy-2-methylpropiono-m-toluidide
l02bb03
bicamide
bicadex
calutol
bical
bicusan
(+-)-bicalutamide
ormandyl
calumid
(+/-)-n-(4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-3-((4-fluorophenyl)sulfonyl)-2-hydroxy-2-methylpropanamide
bicalutamide (usp-rs)
bicalutamide (usp impurity)
bicalutamide (mart.)
bicalutamide (usp monograph)
bypro
n-(4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)3-3((4-fluorophenyl)sulfonyl)-2-hydroxy-2-methyl-propanamide
EN300-1715981
n-[4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-3-(4-fluorobenzenesulfonyl)-2-hydroxy-2-methylpropanamide
Z2108698963

Research Excerpts

Overview

R-bicalutamide is a first-line therapy used to treat prostate cancer (PCa) inhibiting the androgen receptor (AR) which plays an important role in the development and the progression of PCa. Bicalutamide is a widely used, relatively non-toxic anti-androgen, particularly when used in combination with androgen deprivation.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"R-bicalutamide is a first-line therapy used to treat prostate cancer (PCa) inhibiting the androgen receptor (AR) which plays an important role in the development and the progression of PCa. "( An insight about the mechanism of action (MoA) of R-bicalutamide on the androgen receptor homodimer using molecular dynamic.
Cavaliere, F; Cozzini, P, 2022
)
1.69
"Bicalutamide is a nonsteroidal antiandrogen widely used as a first-line clinical treatment for advanced prostate cancer (PCa). "( The ERα-NRF2 signalling axis promotes bicalutamide resistance in prostate cancer.
Cao, J; Du, X; Liang, Z; Peng, Y; Shi, J; Tian, L; Yang, K; Zhang, J, 2022
)
2.44
"Bicalutamide (Casodex(®) ) is a non-steroidal pure anti-androgen used in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. "( Enantiomer selective glucuronidation of the non-steroidal pure anti-androgen bicalutamide by human liver and kidney: role of the human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT)1A9 enzyme.
Barbier, O; Campeau, AS; Caron, P; Caron, S; Grosse, L; Meunier, K; Morin, FA; Trottier, J; Verreault, M, 2013
)
2.06
"Bicalutamide (Casodex®) is a non-steroidal anti-androgen drug used in the treatment of prostate cancer, which represents the second most common malignancy diagnosed in men worldwide. "( Optical biosensor analysis in studying new synthesized bicalutamide analogs binding to androgen receptor.
Bertucci, C; Carrupt, PA; Fortugno, C; Guerrini, A; Varchi, G, 2014
)
2.09
"Bicalutamide (BCM) is an anti-androgen drug used to treat prostate cancer. "( Box-Behnken study design for optimization of bicalutamide-loaded nanostructured lipid carrier: stability assessment.
Belgamwar, VS; Dhas, NL; Ige, PP; Kudarha, R; Pandey, A, 2015
)
2.12
"Bicalutamide is an oral non-steroidal anti-androgen used in the treatment of prostate cancer. "( Effects of the ABCG2 and ABCB1 drug transporter polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of bicalutamide in humans.
Cha, YJ; Joo, HJ; Kim, KA; Lee, HM; Park, JY, 2015
)
2.08
"Bicalutamide is a widely used, relatively non-toxic anti-androgen, particularly when used in combination with androgen deprivation. "( An open-label, phase 2 trial of bicalutamide dose escalation from 50 mg to 150 mg in men with CAB and castration resistance. A Canadian Urology Research Consortium Study.
Aprikian, A; Chin, J; Drachenberg, D; Fradet, Y; Kebabdjian, M; Klotz, L; Singal, R; Zarenda, M, 2014
)
2.13
"Bicalutamide is a non-steroidal anti-androgen drug used for the treatment of androgen-dependent prostate cancer. "( Validation of RP-HPLC Method for Simultaneous Quantification of Bicalutamide and Hesperetin in Polycaprolactone-Bicalutamide-Hesperetin-Chitosan Nanoparticles.
Agrawal, S; Ahmad, H; Arya, A; Dwivedi, AK; Khandelwal, K; Khatik, R; Mittapelly, N; Singh, A, 2015
)
2.1
"R-Bicalutamide is a first generation antiandrogen used to treat prostate cancer, which inhibits androgen action by competitively binding to the androgen receptor (AR). "( Interaction mechanism exploration of R-bicalutamide/S-1 with WT/W741L AR using molecular dynamics simulations.
An, X; Li, J; Li, S; Liu, H; Wang, Y, 2015
)
1.41
"Bicalutamide is a non-steroidal anti-androgen, used during the initiation of androgen deprivation therapy along with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist to reduce the symptoms of tumor-related flares in patients with advanced prostate cancer."( Atypical onset of bicalutamide-induced liver injury.
Joo, JS; Kang, SH; Kim, JS; Kim, KH; Kim, SH; Kim, SW; Lee, BS; Lee, ES; Lee, HY; Moon, HS; Sung, JK; Yun, GY, 2016
)
1.49
"Bicalutamide is a non-steroidal antiandrogen and is an oral medication that is used for treating prostate cancer. "( High performance liquid chromatography method for the pharmacokinetic study of bicalutamide SMEDDS and suspension formulations after oral administration to rats.
Asati, D; Awasthi, A; Chaurasiya, A; Jain, GK; Khar, RK; Mishra, G; Mukherjee, R; Singh, AK, 2009
)
2.02
"Bicalutamide monotherapy is a valuable option for prostate cancer (PCa) patients who wish to avoid the consequences of androgen deprivation; however, this treatment induces gynaecomastia and mastalgia in most patients. "( An open, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial comparing the efficacy of two tamoxifen schedules in preventing gynaecomastia induced by bicalutamide monotherapy in prostate cancer patients.
Aragona, F; Bedognetti, D; Boccardo, F; Canclini, L; Conti, G; Cortellini, P; De Cobelli, O; Di Tonno, P; Francesca, F; Gallucci, M; Lapini, A; Martorana, G; Rubagotti, A, 2010
)
2.01
"Bicalutamide is an oral nonsteroidal antiandrogen drug used during hormone ablation therapy for prostate cancer. "( Comparative pharmacokinetic evaluation of two formulations of bicalutamide 50-mg tablets: an open-label, randomized-sequence, single-dose, two-period crossover study in healthy Korean male volunteers.
Chung, YJ; Jang, IJ; Kim, BH; Lee, S; Shim, JH; Shin, SG; Yoon, SH; Yu, KS, 2009
)
2.04
"Bicalutamide is an oral nonsteroidal antiandrogenic drug used in the treatment of prostate cancer. "( Relative bioavailability and tolerability of two formulations of bicalutamide 50-mg tablets: a randomized-sequence, open-label, two-period crossover study in healthy Korean male subjects.
Cho, JY; Jang, IJ; Lee, S; Shin, SG; Yoon, SH; Yu, KS, 2010
)
2.04
"Bicalutamide (BCT) is an antiandrogenic compound belonging to Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) class II drug. "( Bicalutamide nanocrystals with improved oral bioavailability: in vitro and in vivo evaluation.
Malhi, T; Mandpe, L; Pokharkar, VB,
)
3.02
"Bicalutamide is an anti-androgen that is used worldwide to treat prostate cancer (CaP). "( A study of plasma bicalutamide concentrations in hemodialysis patients.
Goya, N; Ito, F; Kihara, T; Kubo, K; Nakazawa, H; Suzuki, K; Suzuki, T, 2012
)
2.16
"Bicalutamide (BIC) is an alternative treatment to castration for advanced prostate cancer. "( Effects of bicalutamide and 4OH-tamoxifen on androgen-regulated gene expression in the LNCaP cell line.
Argellati, F; Boccardo, F; Mangerini, R; Pfeffer, U, 2012
)
2.21
"Bicalutamide is an oral, once-daily nonsteroidal antiandrogen. "( Bicalutamide: in early-stage prostate cancer.
Carswell, CI; Figgitt, DP, 2002
)
3.2
"Bicalutamide (BCLT) is a well-known non-steroidal antiandrogenic agent able to interfere with androgen receptor (AR)."( Bicalutamide dose-dependently inhibits proliferation in human prostatic carcinoma cell lines and primary cultures.
Angelucci, A; Bologna, M; Eleuterio, E; Festuccia, C; Gravina, GL; Marronaro, A; Miano, R; Muzi, P; Tubaro, A; Vicentini, C,
)
2.3
"Bicalutamide is a nonsteroidal pure antiandrogen given at a dosage of 150 mg once daily as monotherapy for the treatment of early (localised or locally advanced) nonmetastatic prostate cancer. "( Bicalutamide: clinical pharmacokinetics and metabolism.
Cockshott, ID, 2004
)
3.21
"Bicalutamide is a non-steroidal anti-androgen commonly used in the treatment of prostate carcinoma. "( Microarray analysis of bicalutamide action on telomerase activity, p53 pathway and viability of prostate carcinoma cell lines.
Baumforth, KR; Bouchal, J; Kolár, Z; Murray, PG; Sváchová, M; von Angerer, E, 2005
)
2.08
"Bicalutamide (Casodex) is a competitive androgen receptor antagonist that inactivates androgen-regulated prostate cell growth and function, leading to cell apoptosis and inhibition of prostate cancer growth. "( Bicalutamide 150mg: a review of its use in the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer.
Keam, SJ; Wellington, K, 2006
)
3.22
"Bicalutamide (Casodex) is a competitive androgen receptor antagonist that inactivates androgen-regulated prostate cell growth and function, leading to cell apoptosis and inhibition of prostate cancer growth. "( Spotlight on bicalutamide 150mg in the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer.
Keam, SJ; Wellington, K, 2007
)
2.15
"Bicalutamide is a competitive nonsteroidal androgen receptor antagonist. "( Treatment of bicalutamide-induced breast events.
Sieber, PR, 2007
)
2.15
"Bicalutamide is a non-steroidal antiandrogen used in the treatment of prostate cancer. "( Differential mechanisms of bicalutamide-induced apoptosis in prostate cell lines.
Fitzpatrick, JM; Floyd, MS; Teahan, SJ; Watson, RW, 2009
)
2.09
"Bicalutamide is a pure antiandrogen that binds to rat, dog, and human prostate; the affinity compared with the natural ligand 5 alpha-dihydrotestosterone is low, but bicalutamide has an affinity for the rat androgen receptor approximately four times higher than hydroxyflutamide, the active metabolite of flutamide."( The preclinical development of bicalutamide: pharmacodynamics and mechanism of action.
Furr, BJ; Tucker, H, 1996
)
1.3
"Bicalutamide is a new, potent antiandrogen with potential efficacy in the treatment of men with advanced prostate cancer. "( A controlled trial of bicalutamide versus castration in patients with advanced prostate cancer.
Bales, GT; Chodak, GW, 1996
)
2.05
"Bicalutamide is a nonsteroidal competitive inhibitor of androgens at the androgen receptor. "( High-dose bicalutamide monotherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer.
Blackledge, GR, 1996
)
2.14
"Bicalutamide is a potent, nonsteroidal antiandrogen with a plasma half-life consistent with a once-daily schedule. "( Worldwide activity and safety of bicalutamide: a summary review.
Blackledge, GR; Kolvenbag, GJ, 1996
)
2.02
"Bicalutamide is a new antiandrogen that offers the convenience of once-daily administration, demonstrated activity in prostate cancer, and an excellent safety profile. "( Worldwide activity and safety of bicalutamide: a summary review.
Blackledge, GR; Kolvenbag, GJ, 1996
)
2.02
"Bicalutamide is a new, nonsteroidal antiandrogen with a favorable toxicity profile. "( Fulminant hepatic failure associated with bicalutamide.
Chow, E; Dawson, LA; Morton, G, 1997
)
2
"Bicalutamide (Casodex) is a new nonsteroidal antiandrogen developed for use in patients with prostate cancer. "( Bicalutamide (Casodex) in the treatment of prostate cancer: history of clinical development.
Blackledge, GR; Gotting-Smith, K; Kolvenbag, GJ, 1998
)
3.19
"Bicalutamide, 50-mg daily, is a logical first choice for antiandrogen therapy when used in combination with an LHRH-A for the treatment of patients with advanced prostate cancer."( Bicalutamide (Casodex) in the treatment of prostate cancer: history of clinical development.
Blackledge, GR; Gotting-Smith, K; Kolvenbag, GJ, 1998
)
2.46
"Bicalutamide is a nonsteroidal antiandrogen with a long elimination half-life (t1/2) that permits once-daily administration. "( Bicalutamide in advanced prostate cancer. A review.
Goa, KL; Spencer, CM, 1998
)
3.19
"Bicalutamide (Casodex) is a new antiandrogen, so far approved for the treatment of prostate cancer in combinations with a GnRH agonist. "( [Monotherapy with antiandrogens for prostatic cancer].
Sander, S, 1999
)
1.75
"Bicalutamide that acts as a pure antagonist in parental LNCaP cells showed agonistic effects on AR transactivation activity in LNCaP-abl cells and was not able to block the effects of androgen in these cells."( Switch from antagonist to agonist of the androgen receptor bicalutamide is associated with prostate tumour progression in a new model system.
Bartsch, G; Culig, Z; Eder, IE; Erdel, M; Hittmair, A; Hobisch, A; Hoffmann, J; Klocker, H; Parczyk, K; Schneider, MR; Utermann, G, 1999
)
1.27
"bicalutamide is an attractive alternative to castration in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer for whom immediate hormone therapy is indicated."( Bicalutamide monotherapy compared with castration in patients with nonmetastatic locally advanced prostate cancer: 6.3 years of followup.
Anderson, JB; Carroll, K; Chamberlain, M; Iversen, P; Kaisary, AV; Melezinek, I; Tammela, TL; Tyrrell, CJ; Van Poppel, H, 2000
)
2.47
"Bicalutamide is an oral antiandrogen with excellent tolerance and preservation of sexual function."( Survival of patients who had salvage castration after failure on bicalutamide monotherapy for stage (D2) prostate cancer.
Blumenfrucht, M; Chang, V; Cogswell, J; Feuerman, M; Hwang, S; Kasimis, B; Kreis, W; Rae, C; Steafather, H; Wilding, G, 2000
)
1.27
"Bicalutamide is an effective, non-steroidal antiandrogen, suitable for oral, once daily administration. "( [The role of bicalutamide in the treatment of prostate cancer].
Segal, G; Stav, SY, 2002
)
2.13

Effects

Bicalutamide 50 mg has a number of advantages compared with nilutamide and flutamide when used in combination with castration. Bicalutamine has a more favourable side-effect profile than the other antiandrogens.

Bicalutamide has been identified as an AR antagonist and used for treating AR+/ER- breast cancer in a phase II trial. The anti-androgen has a more favourable side-effect profile than the other antiandrogens.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Bicalutamide has a more favourable side-effect profile than the other antiandrogens and is more likely to promote compliance."( The role of antiandrogen monotherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer.
Anderson, J, 2003
)
1.04
"Bicalutamide 50 mg has a number of advantages compared with nilutamide and flutamide when used in combination with castration."( Combined androgen blockade: the case for bicalutamide.
Klotz, L; Schellhammer, P, 2005
)
1.32
"Bicalutamide has no diuretic effect."( Bicalutamide and the new perspectives for female pattern hair loss treatment: What dermatologists should know.
Acioly, P; Barcaui, CB; Carvalho, RM; Donda, ALV; Frattini, SC; Machado, CJ; Melo, DF; Ramos, PM; Santos, LDN, 2022
)
2.89
"Bicalutamide has been identified as an AR antagonist and used for treating AR+/ER- breast cancer in a phase II trial."( Androgen Receptor Expression and Bicalutamide Antagonize Androgen Receptor Inhibit β-Catenin Transcription Complex in Estrogen Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer.
Han, J; Huang, R; Jiang, Y; Li, D; Liang, X; Liu, Q; Niu, M; Panga, D; Song, Y; Sun, S; Wang, S; Wei, W; Xia, B; Zhang, G; Zhang, J; Zheng, W, 2017
)
1.46
"Bicalutamide has been ceased, but 21 months later, Mr FD was still on heart failure medications, and passed away months later probably due to complications of prostate cancer."( Bicalutamide causes heart failure in an elderly patient with prostate cancer.
Guirguis, K, 2016
)
2.6
"Bicalutamide (Casodex) has been used as an anti-androgen agent for prostate cancer patients during hormone ablation therapy."( Bicalutamide inhibits androgen-mediated adhesion of prostate cancer cells exposed to ionizing radiation.
Alavian, MR; Fitzgerald, TJ; Goel, HL; Languino, LR; Wang, T, 2008
)
2.51
"Bicalutamide has been tested in the cell lines mentioned above in the absence and in the presence of MC18, our potent P-glycoprotein/BCRP/MRP1 inhibitor."( Bicalutamide failure in prostate cancer treatment: involvement of Multi Drug Resistance proteins.
Albo, G; Ancona, P; Berardi, F; Colabufo, NA; Contino, M; Inglese, C; Niso, M; Pagliarulo, A; Pagliarulo, V; Perrone, R, 2008
)
2.51
"Bicalutamide has a more favourable side-effect profile than the other antiandrogens and is more likely to promote compliance."( The role of antiandrogen monotherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer.
Anderson, J, 2003
)
1.04
"Bicalutamide 50 mg has a number of advantages compared with nilutamide and flutamide when used in combination with castration."( Combined androgen blockade: the case for bicalutamide.
Klotz, L; Schellhammer, P, 2005
)
1.32
"Bicalutamide has been investigated extensively at daily doses up to 150 mg, and there is evidence of increasing blockade at doses up to this point, as evidenced by increasing suppression of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and also improvement in response rate, both subjective and objective."( High-dose bicalutamide monotherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer.
Blackledge, GR, 1996
)
1.42
"Bicalutamide has not been causally associated with problems such as interstitial pneumonitis and difficulty with light/dark adaptation seen with nilutamide, and in a 50 mg/day dosage causes a lower incidence of diarrhoea than flutamide 750 mg/day."( Bicalutamide in advanced prostate cancer. A review.
Goa, KL; Spencer, CM, 1998
)
2.46
"Bicalutamide (Casodex) has been approved as a new option for the treatment of prostate cancer. "( [A new anti-androgen, bicalutamide (Casodex), for the treatment of prostate cancer--basic clinical aspects].
Akaza, H, 1999
)
2.06

Actions

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Bicalutamide is able to suppress the initial PSA surge as effectively as cyproterone acetate albeit slightly delayed. "( Bicalutamide vs cyproterone acetate in preventing flare with LHRH analogue therapy for prostate cancer--a pilot study.
Benney, M; Gillatt, DA; Okeke, AA; Sugiono, M; Winkler, MH, 2005
)
3.21

Treatment

Bicalutamide treatment enhanced autophagy in LNCaP cells with increased level of autophagosome coupled with an altered cellular morphology reminiscent of neuroendocrine differentiation. Treatment did not influence insulin resistance and CRP level in PCOS. Ineffectiveness may be the result of high prolactin levels at this time.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Bicalutamide treatment significantly decreased the PSA concentration relative to the PCa group and reached the normal level."( The Biochemical Effects of Silver Nanoparticles and Spirulina Extract on Experimentally Induced Prostatic Cancer in Rats.
AbdEl-Hamid, OM; El-Magid, ADA; Younes, MA, 2023
)
1.63
"Bicalutamide treatment enhanced autophagy in LNCaP cells with increased level of autophagosome coupled with an altered cellular morphology reminiscent of neuroendocrine differentiation. "( Does androgen-ablation therapy (AAT) associated autophagy have a pro-survival effect in LNCaP human prostate cancer cells?
Bennett, HL; Fleming, JT; Leung, HY; Mandal, R; O'Prey, J; Robson, CN; Ryan, KM; Stockley, J, 2013
)
1.83
"Bicalutamide-treated and vehicle-only-treated tumours were re-established in vitro, and invasion and sensitivity to docetaxel were measured."( Androgen deprivation results in time-dependent hypoxia in LNCaP prostate tumours: informed scheduling of the bioreductive drug AQ4N improves treatment response.
Byrne, NM; Camac, SN; McKeown, SR; Ming, L; Mitchell, CA; Ward, C; Waugh, DJ; Worthington, J, 2013
)
1.11
"Bicalutamide treatment did not influence insulin resistance and CRP level in PCOS, and this ineffectiveness of bicalutamide on CRP levels may be the result of insulin resistance and/or high prolactin levels at this time."( Serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and insulin resistance in non-obese women with polycystic ovarian syndrome, and effect of bicalutamide on hirsutism, CRP levels and insulin resistance.
Aslan, C; Bahceci, M; Canoruc, N; Kidir, V; Tuzcu, A; Tuzun, Y, 2004
)
1.25
"Bicalutamide treatment induced TrkA and TrkC and reduced p75NTR expression."( In vitro and in vivo effects of bicalutamide on the expression of TrkA and P75 neurotrophin receptors in prostate carcinoma.
Bologna, M; Festuccia, C; Gravina, GL; Muzi, P; Pomante, R; Ricevuto, E; Ventura, L; Vicentini, C, 2007
)
1.34
"Treatment with bicalutamide provided a highly significant reduction of 42% in the risk of objective progression compared with standard care alone (9.0% versus 13.8%, hazards ratio 0.58; 95% confidence interval 0.51, 0.66; p <<0.0001)."( Bicalutamide as immediate therapy either alone or as adjuvant to standard care of patients with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer: first analysis of the early prostate cancer program.
Carroll, K; Chodak, G; Delaere, KP; Gleason, D; Iversen, P; Klimberg, I; Kolvenbag, GJ; Lukkarinen, O; McLeod, DG; Montie, J; Persson, BE; See, WA; Tammela, TL; Tyrrell, C; Vaage, S; Wallace, DM; Wirth, MP, 2002
)
2.1
"Treatment with bicalutamide began in the 60th week in group 3 rats and continued for 14 weeks."( Persistence of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia after effective chemoprevention of microscopic prostate cancer with antiandrogen in a rat model.
Akaza, H; Ideyama, Y; Kawai, K; Shirai, T; Tsukamoto, S; Yamauchi, A, 2006
)
0.67
"Treatment with bicalutamide plus LHRH-A resulted in longer median survival than treatment with flutamide plus LHRH-A."( Clinical benefits of bicalutamide compared with flutamide in combined androgen blockade for patients with advanced prostatic carcinoma: final report of a double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial. Casodex Combination Study Group.
Block, NL; Kolvenbag, GJ; Patterson, AL; Sarosdy, MF; Schellenger, JJ; Schellhammer, PF; Sharifi, R; Soloway, MS; Venner, PM; Vogelzang, NJ, 1997
)
0.96

Toxicity

Of the most common adverse events, those occurring more frequently with enzalutamide than with bicalutamide were fatigue, back pain, and hot flush. Similar adverse events rate were observed among the second-generation ARIs and bicalsutamide.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"001) lower incidence of diarrhea and fewer withdrawals for adverse events among bicalutamide-treated patients."( Worldwide activity and safety of bicalutamide: a summary review.
Blackledge, GR; Kolvenbag, GJ, 1996
)
0.8
" This analysis could increase the information related to these adverse reactions mainly available from the published isolated cases."( Spontaneous reporting of hepatotoxicity associated with antiandrogens: data from the Spanish pharmacovigilance system.
Hidalgo, A; Manso, G; Revuelta, P; Salgueiro, E; Thole, Z, 2006
)
0.33
"Liver disorders were the most common adverse reactions associated with flutamide and bicalutamide, but not with cyproterone acetate."( Spontaneous reporting of hepatotoxicity associated with antiandrogens: data from the Spanish pharmacovigilance system.
Hidalgo, A; Manso, G; Revuelta, P; Salgueiro, E; Thole, Z, 2006
)
0.56
"5 million adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports for 8620 drugs/biologics that are listed for 1191 Coding Symbols for Thesaurus of Adverse Reaction (COSTAR) terms of adverse effects."( Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
Benz, RD; Contrera, JF; Kruhlak, NL; Matthews, EJ; Weaver, JL, 2004
)
0.32
" The most common adverse effects of bicalutamide are induced by its pharmacologic property of competitive androgen receptor blockade and include gynecomastia, hot flashes, fatigue, and decreased libido."( Bicalutamide-associated fulminant hepatotoxicity.
Flaig, TW; O'Bryant, CL; Utz, KJ, 2008
)
2.06
" An understanding of structure-activity relationships (SARs) of chemicals can make a significant contribution to the identification of potential toxic effects early in the drug development process and aid in avoiding such problems."( Developing structure-activity relationships for the prediction of hepatotoxicity.
Fisk, L; Greene, N; Naven, RT; Note, RR; Patel, ML; Pelletier, DJ, 2010
)
0.36
" Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was more common in Arm A compared to Arm B (42 vs."( A randomized phase II efficacy and safety study of vandetanib (ZD6474) in combination with bicalutamide versus bicalutamide alone in patients with chemotherapy naïve castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Azad, AA; Beardsley, EK; Chi, KN; Chin, J; Ellard, SL; Hotte, SJ; Klotz, L; Kollmannsberger, C; Mukherjee, SD, 2014
)
0.62
" Of the most common adverse events, those occurring more frequently with enzalutamide than with bicalutamide were fatigue (51 [28%] of 183 patients in the enzalutamide group vs 38 [20%] of 189 in the bicalutamide group), back pain (35 [19%] vs 34 [18%]), and hot flush (27 [15%] vs 21 [11%]); those occurring more frequently with bicalutamide were nausea (26 [14%] vs 33 [17%]), constipation (23 [13%] vs 25 [13%]), and arthralgia (18 [10%] vs 30 [16%])."( Efficacy and safety of enzalutamide versus bicalutamide for patients with metastatic prostate cancer (TERRAIN): a randomised, double-blind, phase 2 study.
Bhattacharya, S; Chowdhury, S; Hasabou, N; Heidenreich, A; Klotz, L; Shore, ND; Siemens, DR; van Os, S; Villers, A; Wang, F, 2016
)
0.92
"Many adverse drug reactions are caused by the cytochrome P450 (CYP)-dependent activation of drugs into reactive metabolites."( Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
Jones, LH; Nadanaciva, S; Rana, P; Will, Y, 2016
)
0.43
" The adverse event distribution between treatments was similar in each subgroup except for more (5% or greater difference between subgroups) atrial fibrillation, urinary tract infections, falls and decreased appetite as well as less extremity pain and hot flushing in enzalutamide treated patients 75 years old or older, and less back pain and hot flushing in bicalutamide treated patients 75 years old or older."( Efficacy and Safety of Enzalutamide vs Bicalutamide in Younger and Older Patients with Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer in the TERRAIN Trial.
Baron, B; Chowdhury, S; Hasabou, N; Heidenreich, A; Klotz, L; Lin, P; Shore, ND; Siemens, DR; van Os, S; Villers, A; Wang, F, 2018
)
0.92
"We gathered cases diagnosed with prostate cancer based on the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from 2004 to 2020."( Analysis of adverse event of interstitial lung disease in men with prostate cancer receiving hormone therapy using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.
Chen, C; Li, J; Shen, P; Wu, B; Wu, F; Xu, T; Yin, X; Yu, L, 2023
)
0.91
" There is a lack of direct comparison of the therapeutic effects and adverse events between the conventional ARI (bicalutamide) and three second-generation ARIs (enzalutamide, apalutamide and darolutamide)."( The efficacy and adverse events of conventional and second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors for castration-resistant prostate cancer: A network meta-analysis.
Bi, J; Wang, J; Zhang, G; Zhang, X, 2023
)
1.12
"Our network meta-analysis evaluated therapeutic effects and adverse events of the conventional ARI (bicalutamide) and the second-generation ARIs in treating CRPC."( The efficacy and adverse events of conventional and second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors for castration-resistant prostate cancer: A network meta-analysis.
Bi, J; Wang, J; Zhang, G; Zhang, X, 2023
)
1.13
" Similar adverse events rate were observed among the second-generation ARIs and bicalutamide."( The efficacy and adverse events of conventional and second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors for castration-resistant prostate cancer: A network meta-analysis.
Bi, J; Wang, J; Zhang, G; Zhang, X, 2023
)
1.14
" The adverse events of apalutamide were worse than the others, but no statistical significance was observed among these vital AEs."( The efficacy and adverse events of conventional and second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors for castration-resistant prostate cancer: A network meta-analysis.
Bi, J; Wang, J; Zhang, G; Zhang, X, 2023
)
0.91

Pharmacokinetics

A two fold increase in the relative bioavailability of bicalutamide was observed with the SMEDDS compared with suspension formulation. ABCB1 polymorphisms did not affect the plasma levels of bicalsutamide and the pharmacokinetic parameters did not differ among ABCB 1 genotype groups.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The S-enantiomer of bicalutamide is rapidly cleared, but the R-enantiomer has a plasma elimination half-life of about 1 week, with a tenfold plasma accumulation at all dose levels, making it suitable for a once-daily administration."( Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of bicalutamide: defining an active dosing regimen.
Denis, L; Mahler, C, 1996
)
0.88
" After fasting, plasma concentrations of (R)-bicalutamide were much higher than those of (S)-bicalutamide; the mean (R)-enantiomer Cmax (734 ng mL-1) was about nine times higher than the (S)-enantiomer value (84 ng mL-1)."( The effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of the bicalutamide ('Casodex') enantiomers.
Cockshott, ID; Cooper, KJ; Oliver, SD; Young, JJ, 1997
)
0.81
" Pharmacokinetic samples were taken at various time points up to 3 months, and assayed using an achiral HPLC method."( Casodex 10-200 mg daily, used as monotherapy for the treatment of patients with advanced prostate cancer. An overview of the efficacy, tolerability and pharmacokinetics from three phase II dose-ranging studies. Casodex Study Group.
Channer, K; Cockshott, ID; Denis, L; Newling, D; Soloway, M; Tyrrell, CJ, 1998
)
0.3
" Casodex has a half-life of approximately 1 week, enabling once-daily dosing with no effect of age or renal impairment on its pharmacokinetics."( Casodex 10-200 mg daily, used as monotherapy for the treatment of patients with advanced prostate cancer. An overview of the efficacy, tolerability and pharmacokinetics from three phase II dose-ranging studies. Casodex Study Group.
Channer, K; Cockshott, ID; Denis, L; Newling, D; Soloway, M; Tyrrell, CJ, 1998
)
0.3
"This article provides a summary of the pharmacodynamic properties of major antiandrogens as well as an extensive review of their tolerability."( Antiandrogens: a summary review of pharmacodynamic properties and tolerability in prostate cancer therapy.
De Angelis, M; De Benedetto, G; Migliari, R; Murru, M; Muscas, G; Verdacchi, T, 1999
)
0.3
" The kinetics of (S)-Casodex could not be described in the majority of subjects; in the remainder the mean terminal phase half-life for both groups was less than 1 day."( The pharmacokinetics of Casodex enantiomers in subjects with impaired liver function.
Cockshott, ID; Cooper, KJ; Jones, DC; Sotaniemi, EA, 1993
)
0.29
" It has a long plasma elimination half-life (1 week) and accumulates about 10-fold in plasma during daily administration."( Bicalutamide: clinical pharmacokinetics and metabolism.
Cockshott, ID, 2004
)
1.77
"Systemic exposure to bicalutamide stabilised at a dose of approximately 300 mg, as determined by pharmacokinetic analysis."( Tolerability, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of bicalutamide 300 mg, 450 mg or 600 mg as monotherapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer, compared with castration.
Anderson, J; Björk, T; Iversen, P; Kaisary, AV; Morris, T; Tammela, T; Tyrrell, CJ, 2006
)
0.91
" ARR2 Pb-Lux mice provide a novel method for rapid pharmacodynamic evaluation of novel pharmacologic compounds designed to inhibit androgen receptor signaling."( Transgenic mouse model for rapid pharmacodynamic evaluation of antiandrogens.
Ellwood-Yen, K; Sawyers, C; Wongvipat, J, 2006
)
0.33
" Significant difference was observed in main pharmacokinetic parameters of tmax, Cmax and AUC(0 --> infinity) between SMEDDS and suspension, and a two fold increase in the relative bioavailability of bicalutamide was observed with the SMEDDS compared with suspension formulation."( High performance liquid chromatography method for the pharmacokinetic study of bicalutamide SMEDDS and suspension formulations after oral administration to rats.
Asati, D; Awasthi, A; Chaurasiya, A; Jain, GK; Khar, RK; Mishra, G; Mukherjee, R; Singh, AK, 2009
)
0.77
" To this end, the pharmacokinetic properties of the new (test) formulation were compared with those of the currently marketed (reference) formulation."( Comparative pharmacokinetic evaluation of two formulations of bicalutamide 50-mg tablets: an open-label, randomized-sequence, single-dose, two-period crossover study in healthy Korean male volunteers.
Chung, YJ; Jang, IJ; Kim, BH; Lee, S; Shim, JH; Shin, SG; Yoon, SH; Yu, KS, 2009
)
0.59
" Serial blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were taken over 672 hours after dosing."( Comparative pharmacokinetic evaluation of two formulations of bicalutamide 50-mg tablets: an open-label, randomized-sequence, single-dose, two-period crossover study in healthy Korean male volunteers.
Chung, YJ; Jang, IJ; Kim, BH; Lee, S; Shim, JH; Shin, SG; Yoon, SH; Yu, KS, 2009
)
0.59
" The fasting and fed states pharmacokinetic parameters AUC0-576 h, AUC0-∞, Cmax, tmax and t1/2 were determined from plasma concentration-time profile of both formulations."( The relative bioavailability study and fasting and fed states pharmacokinetics of bicalutamide 50-mg tablets in healthy Chinese volunteers.
Lu, HM; Ye, M, 2012
)
0.6
" The pharmacokinetic results showed no differences in exposures to ridaforolimus with and without concomitant bicalutamide administration."( Tolerability, safety and pharmacokinetics of ridaforolimus in combination with bicalutamide in patients with asymptomatic, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).
de Bono, JS; de Wit, R; Ebbinghaus, SW; Heath, KH; Hudes, GR; Li, X; Meulenbeld, HJ; Tagawa, ST; Whang, YE; Zandvliet, AS, 2013
)
0.83
" This novel DBS method has been applied to a pharmacokinetic study in mice."( Development of an LC-MS/MS method for determination of bicalutamide on dried blood spots: application to pharmacokinetic study in mice.
Kumar, A; Mullangi, R; P S, S; Vijay Kumar, S, 2015
)
0.66
"After a single oral dose of 150mg bicalutamide was administered, plasma concentrations of bicalutamide were measured, and pharmacokinetic analyses were performed in 27 healthy subjects according to ABCB1 (c."( Effects of the ABCG2 and ABCB1 drug transporter polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of bicalutamide in humans.
Cha, YJ; Joo, HJ; Kim, KA; Lee, HM; Park, JY, 2015
)
0.92
"ABCB1 polymorphisms did not affect the plasma levels of bicalutamide and the pharmacokinetic parameters did not differ among ABCB1 genotype groups."( Effects of the ABCG2 and ABCB1 drug transporter polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of bicalutamide in humans.
Cha, YJ; Joo, HJ; Kim, KA; Lee, HM; Park, JY, 2015
)
0.88

Compound-Compound Interactions

A randomized, multicenter trial, double-blind for antiandrogen therapy, compared the antiandrogens bicalutamide and flutamide, each combined with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy (LHRH-A) in 813 patients with Stage D2 prostate carcinoma.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"To compare the efficacy and safety of bicalutamide and flutamide, each used in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing analogue (LHRH-A) therapy, in patients with untreated metastatic (Stage D2) prostate cancer."( A controlled trial of bicalutamide versus flutamide, each in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy, in patients with advanced prostate cancer. Casodex Combination Study Group.
Block, N; Jones, J; Kolvenbag, G; Patterson, AL; Sarosdy, M; Schellhammer, P; Sharifi, R; Soloway, M; Venner, P; Vogelzang, N, 1995
)
0.88
"To review the outcome of therapy with maximal androgen blockade and compare the efficacy and safety of bicalutamide and flutamide, each used in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue (LHRH-A) therapy, in patients with untreated metastatic (Stage D2) prostate cancer."( Maximal androgen blockade for patients with metastatic prostate cancer: outcome of a controlled trial of bicalutamide versus flutamide, each in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy. Casodex Combination Study Group.
Block, N; Jones, J; Kolvenbag, G; Patterson, AL; Sarosdy, M; Schellhammer, P; Sharifi, R; Soloway, M; Venner, P; Vogelzang, N, 1996
)
0.72
" Because of its efficacy and tolerability profile, together with its convenient once-daily dosing formulation, bicalutamide represents a prime candidate for antiandrogen of first choice in combination with LHRH-A therapy in the treatment of men with metastatic prostate cancer."( Maximal androgen blockade for patients with metastatic prostate cancer: outcome of a controlled trial of bicalutamide versus flutamide, each in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy. Casodex Combination Study Group.
Block, N; Jones, J; Kolvenbag, G; Patterson, AL; Sarosdy, M; Schellhammer, P; Sharifi, R; Soloway, M; Venner, P; Vogelzang, N, 1996
)
0.72
"A randomized, multicenter trial, double-blind for antiandrogen therapy, compared the antiandrogens bicalutamide and flutamide, each combined with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy (LHRH-A) in 813 patients with Stage D2 prostate carcinoma."( A controlled trial of bicalutamide versus flutamide, each in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy, in patients with advanced prostate carcinoma. Analysis of time to progression. CASODEX Combination Study Group.
Block, NL; Chen, Y; Kolvenbag, GJ; Patterson, AL; Sarosdy, MF; Schellhammer, PF; Sharifi, R; Soloway, MS; Venner, PM; Vogelzang, NJ, 1996
)
0.83
"205 patients with previously untreated stage C/D prostate cancer were randomized (1:1) to receive once-daily bicalutamide 80 mg or placebo, each combined with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist."( Superior anti-tumor efficacy of bicalutamide 80 mg in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist versus LHRH agonist monotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced prostate cancer: interim results of a randomized study in Ja
Akaza, H; Arai, Y; Igawa, M; Kanetake, H; Kumon, H; Matsuda, T; Naito, S; Ohashi, Y; Soeda, A; Usami, M; Yamaguchi, A, 2004
)
0.82
"In Japanese patients with advanced prostate cancer, first-line treatment with bicalutamide 80 mg in combination with an LHRH agonist is superior to LHRH agonist monotherapy in terms of the antitumor response at 12 weeks, and also time to treatment failure and progression, and does not compromise treatment safety."( Superior anti-tumor efficacy of bicalutamide 80 mg in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist versus LHRH agonist monotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced prostate cancer: interim results of a randomized study in Ja
Akaza, H; Arai, Y; Igawa, M; Kanetake, H; Kumon, H; Matsuda, T; Naito, S; Ohashi, Y; Soeda, A; Usami, M; Yamaguchi, A, 2004
)
0.84
"A total of 151 patients with prostate cancer, who were enrolled into this study from May 2001 to June 2003, were randomized to receive CAB therapy using a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (leuprorelin) combined with a steroidal antiandrogen (chlormadinone) or a nonsteroidal antiandrogen (bicalutamide)."( Hot flashes during androgen deprivation therapy with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist combined with steroidal or nonsteroidal antiandrogen for prostate cancer.
Hakariya, H; Hara, T; Hayashi, M; Igawa, T; Iwasaki, S; Kanetake, H; Kusaba, Y; Sakai, H; Tsurusaki, T; Yura, M, 2009
)
0.53
" These results suggest that the up-regulation of IGFBP3 induced by 5-FU plays an important role in the potent anti-tumor effect of 5-FU combined with anti-androgens on CRPC."( Up-regulation of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) leads to the potent anti-proliferative effect of androgen deprivation therapy combined with 5-FU in human prostate cancer cell lines.
Itoh, K; Kanayama, H; Kawabata, R; Oie, S; Oka, T; Takahashi, M, 2011
)
0.37
"The objective of this trial was to evaluate the clinical effects of sorafenib, a multi-targeted kinase inhibitor, in combination with androgen receptor blockade in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer."( A phase II study of sorafenib in combination with bicalutamide in patients with chemotherapy-naive castration resistant prostate cancer.
Beardsley, EK; Chi, KN; Ellard, SL; Hotte, SJ; Kollmannsberger, C; Mukherjee, SD; North, S; Winquist, E, 2012
)
0.63
" Sorafenib 400 mg twice daily was administered with bicalutamide 50 mg once daily on a 28-day cycle."( A phase II study of sorafenib in combination with bicalutamide in patients with chemotherapy-naive castration resistant prostate cancer.
Beardsley, EK; Chi, KN; Ellard, SL; Hotte, SJ; Kollmannsberger, C; Mukherjee, SD; North, S; Winquist, E, 2012
)
0.88
" We report here the results of a phase I trial evaluating a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting CTLA-4, CP-675,206 (tremelimumab), in combination with androgen deprivation using an antiandrogen."( Phase I trial of tremelimumab in combination with short-term androgen deprivation in patients with PSA-recurrent prostate cancer.
Eickhoff, JC; Lang, JM; Liu, G; McNeel, DG; Smith, HA; Staab, MJ; Wilding, G, 2012
)
0.38
" We evaluated safety and tolerability as well as potential drug-drug interaction of ridaforolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, when combined with the androgen receptor inhibitor bicalutamide in patients with asymptomatic, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer."( Tolerability, safety and pharmacokinetics of ridaforolimus in combination with bicalutamide in patients with asymptomatic, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).
de Bono, JS; de Wit, R; Ebbinghaus, SW; Heath, KH; Hudes, GR; Li, X; Meulenbeld, HJ; Tagawa, ST; Whang, YE; Zandvliet, AS, 2013
)
0.81
"Although there was no evidence of a clinically relevant pharmacological drug-drug interaction, the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities in 3 of 11 evaluable patients at a reduced dose of ridaforolimus of 30 mg/day suggests that this combination may not be well suited for asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic prostate cancer patients."( Tolerability, safety and pharmacokinetics of ridaforolimus in combination with bicalutamide in patients with asymptomatic, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).
de Bono, JS; de Wit, R; Ebbinghaus, SW; Heath, KH; Hudes, GR; Li, X; Meulenbeld, HJ; Tagawa, ST; Whang, YE; Zandvliet, AS, 2013
)
0.62
"The aim of this study was to evaluate acute adverse events and efficacy of three-dimensional intensity- modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) combined with endocrine therapy for intermediate and advanced prostate cancer."( Intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with endocrine therapy for intermediate and advanced prostate cancer: long-term outcome of Chinese patients.
Cheng, HH; Fu, ZC; Li, DS; Lin, GS; Luo, HC, 2013
)
0.39
"Sixty-seven patients were treated with three-dimensional IMRT combined with maximum androgen blockade."( Intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with endocrine therapy for intermediate and advanced prostate cancer: long-term outcome of Chinese patients.
Cheng, HH; Fu, ZC; Li, DS; Lin, GS; Luo, HC, 2013
)
0.39
"IMRT combined with endocrine therapy demonstrated promising efficacy and was well tolerated in patients with intermediate and advanced prostate cancer."( Intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with endocrine therapy for intermediate and advanced prostate cancer: long-term outcome of Chinese patients.
Cheng, HH; Fu, ZC; Li, DS; Lin, GS; Luo, HC, 2013
)
0.39
"To observe the clinical effect of tashinone IIA combined with endocrine therapy in treating advanced-stage prostate cancer."( Clinical research of Tashinone IIA combined with endocrine therapy in treating advanced-stage prostate cancer.
Li, F; Song, L; Tang, L; Tian, F; Wang, Z; Yang, J; Yu, Z, 2014
)
0.4
" The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in health-related QOL in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) combined with androgen deprivation therapy."( Long-term quality of life outcomes in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer after intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with androgen deprivation.
Cheng, HH; Cheng, LP; Fu, ZC; Li, DS; Liao, SG; Lin, GS; Luo, HC; Xu, JF; Yin, Q; Yu, QY; Zheng, WF; Zhu, JF, 2014
)
0.4
" These are of particular interest since anti-androgenic biological activity has been identified in the aquatic environment and is potentially implicated in sexual disruption alone and in combination with steroid oestrogens."( Environmental concentrations of anti-androgenic pharmaceuticals do not impact sexual disruption in fish alone or in combination with steroid oestrogens.
Brian, J; Green, C; Jobling, S; Kanda, R; Scholze, M; Williams, R, 2015
)
0.42
"To compare the efficacy of enzalutamide vs bicalutamide in combination with ADT in men with mHSPC, with a subset analysis of Black patients."( Clinical Efficacy of Enzalutamide vs Bicalutamide Combined With Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Men With Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Cher, ML; Chinni, S; Dickow, B; Dobson, K; Fontana, JA; Heath, EI; Heilbrun, LK; Hwang, C; Jasti, P; Monk, P; Semaan, L; Smith, D; Sonpavde, G; Tejwani, S; Vaishampayan, UN, 2021
)
1.16
"The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of abiraterone acetate with that of bicalutamide in combination with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist treatment for patients with high-risk metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC)."( Abiraterone acetate versus bicalutamide in combination with gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist therapy for high risk metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer.
Fujihara, A; Hongo, F; Ito, S; Matsugasumi, T; Ohashi, M; Okihara, K; Shiraishi, T; Ueda, T; Ukimura, O; Yamada, Y, 2021
)
1.14
"To investigate the effect of bicalutamide combined with docetaxel on the levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in serum and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in patients with advanced prostate carcinoma (PCa)."( Effect of Bicalutamide Combined with Docetaxel on Serum PSA and VEGF Levels in Patients with Advanced Prostate Carcinoma.
Guo, Z; Hu, X; Liu, Z; Lv, R; Meng, L; Yan, L; Zhang, Y, 2022
)
1.41
"The implementation of bicalutamide combined with docetaxel in patients with advanced PCa is effective in reducing the inflammatory expression and improving quality of life and has a higher safety profile."( Effect of Bicalutamide Combined with Docetaxel on Serum PSA and VEGF Levels in Patients with Advanced Prostate Carcinoma.
Guo, Z; Hu, X; Liu, Z; Lv, R; Meng, L; Yan, L; Zhang, Y, 2022
)
1.44
" In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rezvilutamide versus bicalutamide in combination with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) for high-volume, metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer."( Rezvilutamide versus bicalutamide in combination with androgen-deprivation therapy in patients with high-volume, metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (CHART): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.
Chen, C; Chen, Z; Chong, T; Dong, Q; Gu, W; Guo, H; Han, W; He, D; Huang, J; Jiang, J; Jin, C; Li, H; Li, J; Liang, C; Luo, H; Ma, L; Tian, Y; Wang, Y; Xiao, J; Yang, X; Ye, D; Zhang, X; Zhou, F; Zhu, S; Zou, Q, 2022
)
1.26

Bioavailability

The assessment of the mechanisms driving the increase in drug dissolution is of particular importance in drug development. The method developed is a simple, fast and precise method and is used in bioavailability and bioequivalence studies.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Casodex has been shown to be orally bioavailable and well absorbed, with a plasma half-life of around 1 week."( Clinical progress with a new antiandrogen, Casodex (bicalutamide).
Blackledge, GR, 1996
)
0.54
" Clinical studies indicated that Casodex is orally bioavailable and well absorbed, with a plasma half-life of around 1 week."( Casodex (bicalutamide): overview of a new antiandrogen developed for the treatment of prostate cancer.
Blackledge, GR; Cockshott, ID; Furr, BJ, 1997
)
0.71
"The oral bioavailability of two investigational formulations of bicalutamide was compared with the current clinical formulation."( Pharmacokinetics of two novel bicalutamide formulations in healthy male volunteers.
Cantarini, M; Fuhr, R; Morris, T, 2006
)
0.86
"The concurrent administration of tamoxifen and bicalutamide reduces the synthesis and bioavailability of IGF-1."( Influence of bicalutamide with or without tamoxifen or anastrozole on insulin-like growth factor 1 and binding proteins in prostate cancer patients.
Battaglia, M; Bertaccini, A; Boccardo, F; Conti, G; Romagnoli, A; Rubagotti, A; Zattoni, F,
)
0.76
"These data suggest that GCP, an isoflavone-enriched compound with minimal side-effects and far superior intestinal absorption rate of genistein, has significant clinical potential in combination with docetaxel, bicalutamide or targeted agents for the treatment of advanced CaP."( Genistein combined polysaccharide enhances activity of docetaxel, bicalutamide and Src kinase inhibition in androgen-dependent and independent prostate cancer cell lines.
Burich, RA; Holland, WS; Mack, PC; Tepper, C; Vinall, RL; White, RW, 2008
)
0.77
" To evaluate the bioavailability of bicalutamide from bicalutamide self-microemulsifying drug delivery systems (SMEDDS) and bicalutamide suspension formulations, a sensitive, specific reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method using ultraviolet detection was developed and validated for the analysis of bicalutamide (BCT) in rat blood plasma."( High performance liquid chromatography method for the pharmacokinetic study of bicalutamide SMEDDS and suspension formulations after oral administration to rats.
Asati, D; Awasthi, A; Chaurasiya, A; Jain, GK; Khar, RK; Mishra, G; Mukherjee, R; Singh, AK, 2009
)
0.86
"This study evaluated the relative bioavailability and tolerability of the new generic formulation of bicalutamide 50-mg tablets (test) and the currently marketed formulation (reference) in healthy Korean male subjects."( Relative bioavailability and tolerability of two formulations of bicalutamide 50-mg tablets: a randomized-sequence, open-label, two-period crossover study in healthy Korean male subjects.
Cho, JY; Jang, IJ; Lee, S; Shin, SG; Yoon, SH; Yu, KS, 2010
)
0.81
" It is of particular importance as poor dissolution profiles are considered to be the major limitation in bioavailability of the drug."( Planetary ball milling and supercritical fluid technology as a way to enhance dissolution of bicalutamide.
Antosik, A; Chmiel, K; Jachowicz, R; Knapik-Kowalczuk, J; Kurek, M; Paluch, M; Syrek, K; Szafraniec, J, 2017
)
0.67
" Given the dissolution rate-limited absorption combined with the reduced bioavailability of bicalutamide as a BCS class II drug, the assessment of the mechanisms driving the increase in drug dissolution is of particular importance in drug development."( Enhanced dissolution of solid dispersions containing bicalutamide subjected to mechanical stress.
Antosik, A; Chmiel, K; Gawlak, K; Jachowicz, R; Knapik-Kowalczuk, J; Kurek, M; Paluch, M; Szafraniec, J, 2018
)
0.95
" The findings for the co-amorphous formulation were in agreement with the pharmacokinetics data, showing a quicker onset in plasma concentration as well as a higher bioavailability for both DTX (15-fold) and BIC (3-fold) compared to the crystalline drugs alone."( Efflux Inhibitor Bicalutamide Increases Oral Bioavailability of the Poorly Soluble Efflux Substrate Docetaxel in Co-Amorphous Anti-Cancer Combination Therapy.
Bohr, A; Grohganz, H; Harmankaya, N; Löbmann, K; Nascimento, TL; Rades, T; Wang, Y; Weisser, JJ, 2019
)
0.85
"Bicalutamide (BCT), an anticancer drug, suffers from dissolution rate limited bioavailability and poor micromeritic properties."( Spherical agglomeration to improve dissolution and micromeritic properties of an anticancer drug, Bicalutamide.
Dalvadi, H; Parmar, K; Yadav, S, 2019
)
2.17
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51
"The result of the present study show that the method developed is a simple, fast and precise method and is used in bioavailability and bioequivalence studies as well as during routine therapeutic drug monitoring of niclosamide and bicalutamide."( A simultaneous liquid chromatographic analysis of niclosamide and bicalutamide in rat plasma by protein precipitation extraction.
Annegowda, HV; Chaitra, VM; Chetan, IA; Majumder, M; Ramesh, B; Sagheer Ahmed, S, 2022
)
1.14

Dosage Studied

The toxicological profile of bicalutamide in animals following acute and chronic dosing is closely associated with the drug's non-steroidal anti-androgenic pharmacological activity. The one tablet, once-a-day dosing regimen is at least as effective as flutamide and is better tolerated in terms of diarrhea.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" doses and during daily oral dosing to male and female rats and male dogs."( The pharmacokinetics of Casodex in laboratory animals.
Cockshott, ID; Cooper, KJ; Plummer, GF; Warwick, MJ, 1991
)
0.28
"Although a dosage of 50 mg of bicalutamide once daily was not as effective as castration, the favorable quality of life outcomes and the low incidence of nonhormonal adverse events provide reasons to evaluate bicalutamide, as a single therapeutic agent, at higher doses."( Single-agent therapy with bicalutamide: a comparison with medical or surgical castration in the treatment of advanced prostate carcinoma.
Block, NL; Chodak, G; Kasimis, B; Kennealey, GT; Macramalla, E; Sharifi, R, 1995
)
0.88
"Casodex, a new nonsteroidal antiandrogen, was investigated in this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study comprising 28 evaluable patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia, who received Casodex at a dosage of 50 mg daily or a placebo for 24 weeks."( Safety, side effects and patient acceptance of the antiandrogen Casodex in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Eri, LM; Tveter, KJ, 1994
)
0.29
"The effect of the nonsteroidal antiandrogen Casodex (176334) on a number of risk factors for cardiovascular diseases was investigated in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study comprising 27 evaluable patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia who received either placebo or Casodex at a dosage of 50 mg daily for 24 weeks."( Effects of the nonsteroidal antiandrogen Casodex on lipoproteins, fibrinogen and plasminogen activator inhibitor in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Eri, LM; Urdal, P, 1995
)
0.29
" The safety and efficacy of Casodex at a dosage of 50 mg."( A prospective, placebo-controlled study of the antiandrogen Casodex as treatment for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Eri, LM; Tveter, KJ, 1993
)
0.29
" Because of its efficacy and tolerability profile, together with its convenient once-daily dosing formulation, bicalutamide represents a prime candidate for antiandrogen of first choice in combination with LHRH-A therapy in the treatment of men with metastatic prostate cancer."( Maximal androgen blockade for patients with metastatic prostate cancer: outcome of a controlled trial of bicalutamide versus flutamide, each in combination with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue therapy. Casodex Combination Study Group.
Block, N; Jones, J; Kolvenbag, G; Patterson, AL; Sarosdy, M; Schellhammer, P; Sharifi, R; Soloway, M; Venner, P; Vogelzang, N, 1996
)
0.72
" The specific aim was to demonstrate pharmacological activity, which would translate into clinical efficacy, good tolerability in the context of its use, oral availability, a convenient and forgiving dosing regimen, and clinical acceptability."( Clinical progress with a new antiandrogen, Casodex (bicalutamide).
Blackledge, GR, 1996
)
0.54
" The statistically significant changes were small in absolute terms and showed no dose-response relationship."( Absence of hepatic enzyme induction in prostate cancer patients receiving 'Casodex' (bicalutamide).
Kaisary, A; Klarskov, P; McKillop, D, 1996
)
0.52
"The toxicological profile of bicalutamide in animals following acute and chronic dosing is closely associated with the drug's non-steroidal anti-androgenic pharmacological activity."( An overview of animal toxicology studies with bicalutamide (ICI 176,334).
Betton, GR; Imai, M; Iswaran, TJ; Siddall, RA, 1997
)
0.85
" The observed slightly higher values of Cmax for (R)-bicalutamide (14%) and (S)-bicalutamide (19%), when dosing with food, achieved statistical significance."( The effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of the bicalutamide ('Casodex') enantiomers.
Cockshott, ID; Cooper, KJ; Oliver, SD; Young, JJ, 1997
)
0.8
"For both flutamide and Casodex, no consistent difference was found between the effects of once daily and thrice daily oral dosing in the rat."( Daily dosing with flutamide or Casodex exerts maximal antiandrogenic activity.
Candas, B; Chen, C; Labrie, C; Labrie, F; Luo, S; Martel, C; Singh, SM, 1997
)
0.3
" Another finding is that once daily dosing with flutamide exhibits an effectiveness comparable to thrice daily dosing; such data may have potential significance in facilitating compliance by administration of flutamide once daily instead of the current thrice daily schedule in men."( Daily dosing with flutamide or Casodex exerts maximal antiandrogenic activity.
Candas, B; Chen, C; Labrie, C; Labrie, F; Luo, S; Martel, C; Singh, SM, 1997
)
0.3
"To evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, endocrinological effects and the pharmacokinetics of Casodex, when given as monotherapy during daily dosing of 10-200 mg to patients with advanced prostate cancer."( Casodex 10-200 mg daily, used as monotherapy for the treatment of patients with advanced prostate cancer. An overview of the efficacy, tolerability and pharmacokinetics from three phase II dose-ranging studies. Casodex Study Group.
Channer, K; Cockshott, ID; Denis, L; Newling, D; Soloway, M; Tyrrell, CJ, 1998
)
0.3
" Casodex has a half-life of approximately 1 week, enabling once-daily dosing with no effect of age or renal impairment on its pharmacokinetics."( Casodex 10-200 mg daily, used as monotherapy for the treatment of patients with advanced prostate cancer. An overview of the efficacy, tolerability and pharmacokinetics from three phase II dose-ranging studies. Casodex Study Group.
Channer, K; Cockshott, ID; Denis, L; Newling, D; Soloway, M; Tyrrell, CJ, 1998
)
0.3
" Although early trials demonstrated clinical benefits with bicalutamide 50 mg/day as monotherapy, the drug in this dosage is less effective than castration."( Bicalutamide in advanced prostate cancer. A review.
Goa, KL; Spencer, CM, 1998
)
1.99
" Assuming that each modality is equally effective, emphasis should be placed on increasing patient tolerance and compliance by the use of long-acting, nontoxic treatments with simple dosing regimens and minimal side effects."( Androgen deprivation for prostatic carcinoma: a rationale for choosing components.
Chatelain, C; Fourcade, RO, 1998
)
0.3
" Bicalutamide is available in a convenient one tablet, once-a-day dosing regimen, is at least as effective as flutamide and is better tolerated in terms of diarrhea."( Which is the optimal antiandrogen for use in combined androgen blockade of advanced prostate cancer? The transition from a first- to second-generation antiandrogen.
Sarosdy, MF, 1999
)
1.21
" Bicalutamide is also a nonsteroidal anti-androgen that offers the advantages of reduced dosage amounts and reduction in side effects."( Anti-androgens and other hormonal therapies for prostate cancer.
Richie, JP, 1999
)
1.21
" Bicalutamide is not associated with interstitial pneumonitis and difficulty with light/dark adaptation seen with nilutamide, and in 50 mg/day dosage causes a lower incidence of diarrhea than flutamide 750 mg/day."( [The role of bicalutamide in the treatment of prostate cancer].
Segal, G; Stav, SY, 2002
)
1.59
"The overall results indicate that bicalutamide administered as a 50-mg daily dosage in combination with castration is a well-tolerated therapy for the treatment of patients with advanced prostate cancer."( Tolerability assessment of maximal androgen blockade with 50 mg daily of bicalutamide and castration in patients with advanced prostate cancer.
Chiang, YJ; Chu, SH; Chuang, CK; Lin, MH; Lin, SJ; Wei, TY; Wu, CT, 2002
)
0.83
"Bicalutamide is a nonsteroidal pure antiandrogen given at a dosage of 150 mg once daily as monotherapy for the treatment of early (localised or locally advanced) nonmetastatic prostate cancer."( Bicalutamide: clinical pharmacokinetics and metabolism.
Cockshott, ID, 2004
)
3.21
"A macro-simulation model was developed to compare the cost-effectiveness of 2 interventions for stage D2 prostate cancer, 1) CAB with bicalutamide 50 mg per day and monthly dosing of an LH-RHa or 2) monthly LH-RH agonist therapy."( The cost-effectiveness of combined androgen blockade with bicalutamide and luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonist in men with metastatic prostate cancer.
Clarke, L; Gandhi, S; Hirsch, M; Penson, DF; Ramsey, S; Veenstra, D, 2005
)
0.78
" Depending on the intended indication and dosing regimen, PPL can delay or stop development of a compound in the drug discovery process."( Evaluation of a published in silico model and construction of a novel Bayesian model for predicting phospholipidosis inducing potential.
Gehlhaar, D; Greene, N; Johnson, TO; Pelletier, DJ; Tilloy-Ellul, A,
)
0.13
" The lead compound [3aS-(3aalpha,4beta,5beta,7beta,7aalpha)]-4-(octahydro-5-hydroxy-4,7-dimethyl-1,3-dioxo-4,7-epoxy-2H-isoindol-2-yl)-2-iodobenzonitrile was shown to have potent in vivo efficacy after oral dosing in the CWR22 human prostate tumor xenograph model."( Identification and optimization of a novel series of [2.2.1]-oxabicyclo imide-based androgen receptor antagonists.
Attar, RM; Balog, A; Chandrasena, G; Fura, A; Furch, JA; Galella, MA; Geng, J; Giese, S; Gottardis, MM; Gougoutas, J; Jure-Kunkel, M; Krystek, SR; Mitt, T; Obermeier, M; Rampulla, R; Rizzo, CA; Salvati, ME; Shan, W; Vite, GD, 2008
)
0.35
" We proposed a systematic classification scheme using FDA-approved drug labeling to assess the DILI potential of drugs, which yielded a benchmark dataset with 287 drugs representing a wide range of therapeutic categories and daily dosage amounts."( FDA-approved drug labeling for the study of drug-induced liver injury.
Chen, M; Fang, H; Liu, Z; Shi, Q; Tong, W; Vijay, V, 2011
)
0.37
" The plasma R-bicalutamide levels on the non-dialysis day were measured in 2 patients (patients 1 and 2) immediately before dosing and 8 and 24 h after dosing."( A study of plasma bicalutamide concentrations in hemodialysis patients.
Goya, N; Ito, F; Kihara, T; Kubo, K; Nakazawa, H; Suzuki, K; Suzuki, T, 2012
)
1.07
" Using a daily dosing regimen with lead-in, concurrent, and post-XRT therapy, the recommended phase 2 dose of sunitinib is 25 mg daily."( Sunitinib plus androgen deprivation and radiation therapy for patients with localized high-risk prostate cancer: results from a multi-institutional phase 1 study.
Corn, PG; DePetrillo, TA; Heath, E; Kuban, D; Maier, J; Mathew, P; Meyn, R; Song, DY, 2013
)
0.39
" After decreasing his anti-androgen dosage and starting a specified regimen of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor therapy, his serum PSA levels were found to be elevated."( Prostate cancer risk after anti-androgen treatment for priapism.
Burnett, AL; Goetz, T, 2014
)
0.4
" In dose-response F2H experiments, we compared the potencies of abiraterone, bicalutamide, enzalutamide, flutamide, and galeterone/TOK-001 to prevent the dihydrotestosterone-induced N/C interaction in wt AR."( The fluorescent two-hybrid assay for live-cell profiling of androgen receptor modulators.
Bogner, J; Hickson, I; Romer, T; Yurlova, L; Zolghadr, K, 2017
)
0.68
"Many anti-cancer drugs are difficult to formulate into an oral dosage form because they are both poorly water-soluble and show poor permeability, the latter often as a result of being an intestinal efflux pump substrate."( Efflux Inhibitor Bicalutamide Increases Oral Bioavailability of the Poorly Soluble Efflux Substrate Docetaxel in Co-Amorphous Anti-Cancer Combination Therapy.
Bohr, A; Grohganz, H; Harmankaya, N; Löbmann, K; Nascimento, TL; Rades, T; Wang, Y; Weisser, JJ, 2019
)
0.85
" This approach gives the opportunity to modify tablet properties in a wide range, especially the dissolution rate, by producing dosage forms with a complex design."( Speed it up, slow it down…An issue of bicalutamide release from 3D printed tablets.
Czech, A; Gawlak, K; Jachowicz, R; Jamróz, W; Knapik-Kowalczuk, J; Kurek, M; Leszczyński, B; Paluch, M; Szafraniec-Szczęsny, J; Wróbel, A, 2020
)
0.83
" These include the use of multifactorial data analysis identifying correlations between the components and dosage form properties, laboratory and production process parameters with respect to the API liberation Example of such API is bicalutamide."( Multivariate analysis in the development of bioequivalent tablets containing bicalutamide.
Doležel, P; Farkaš, P; Franc, A; Goněc, R; Sova, P, 2021
)
1.03
"Radiation dose-response viability and clonogenic assays showed that apalutamide had a stronger radio-sensitising activity for all three cell lines."( Apalutamide radio-sensitisation of prostate cancer.
Giatromanolaki, A; Kakouratos, C; Kalamida, D; Koukourakis, MI; Lamprou, I; Nanos, C; Xanthopoulou, E, 2021
)
0.62
"05) were significantly decreased after two different dosage of Bicalutamide treatment."( Bicalutamide, an androgen receptor antagonist, effectively alleviate allergic rhinitis via suppression of PI3K-PKB activity.
Cheng, L; Ma, X; Wu, G; Wu, X; Zhang, Q; Zhang, Y, 2023
)
2.59
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Drug Classes (6)

ClassDescription
(trifluoromethyl)benzenesAn organofluorine compound that is (trifluoromethyl)benzene and derivatives arising from substitution of one or more of the phenyl hydrogens.
monocarboxylic acid amideA carboxamide derived from a monocarboxylic acid.
monofluorobenzenesAny member of the class of fluorobenzenes containing a mono- or poly-substituted benzene ring carrying a single fluorine substitutent.
nitrileA compound having the structure RC#N; thus a C-substituted derivative of hydrocyanic acid, HC#N. In systematic nomenclature, the suffix nitrile denotes the triply bound #N atom, not the carbon atom attached to it.
sulfoneAn organosulfur compound having the structure RS(=O)2R (R =/= H).
tertiary alcoholA tertiary alcohol is a compound in which a hydroxy group, -OH, is attached to a saturated carbon atom which has three other carbon atoms attached to it.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Protein Targets (43)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Chain A, Beta-lactamaseEscherichia coli K-12Potency89.12510.044717.8581100.0000AID485294
thioredoxin reductaseRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency0.39810.100020.879379.4328AID588453
RAR-related orphan receptor gammaMus musculus (house mouse)Potency25.99560.006038.004119,952.5996AID1159521; AID1159523
ATAD5 protein, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency20.58780.004110.890331.5287AID493106
TDP1 proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency12.77810.000811.382244.6684AID686978; AID686979
GLI family zinc finger 3Homo sapiens (human)Potency15.10540.000714.592883.7951AID1259369; AID1259392
AR proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency11.88120.000221.22318,912.5098AID1259243; AID1259247; AID1259381; AID743035; AID743040; AID743042; AID743054; AID743063
estrogen receptor 2 (ER beta)Homo sapiens (human)Potency50.37550.000657.913322,387.1992AID1259378
progesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency1.12780.000417.946075.1148AID1346795
EWS/FLI fusion proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency2.32390.001310.157742.8575AID1259252; AID1259253; AID1259255; AID1259256
retinoid X nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency28.57870.000817.505159.3239AID1159527
estrogen-related nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency22.92610.001530.607315,848.9004AID1224819; AID1224820; AID1224821; AID1224841; AID1224842; AID1224848; AID1224849; AID1259401; AID1259403
pregnane X nuclear receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency31.78480.005428.02631,258.9301AID1346982
estrogen nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency29.53460.000229.305416,493.5996AID1259244; AID1259248; AID743069; AID743075; AID743078; AID743079; AID743080; AID743091
peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)Potency15.67930.001019.414170.9645AID743140
arylsulfatase AHomo sapiens (human)Potency4.77551.069113.955137.9330AID720538
aryl hydrocarbon receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency29.84930.000723.06741,258.9301AID743085
activating transcription factor 6Homo sapiens (human)Potency32.06590.143427.612159.8106AID1159516
nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group I, member 2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency10.00000.10009.191631.6228AID1346983
chromobox protein homolog 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency0.03770.006026.168889.1251AID488953
thyroid hormone receptor beta isoform 2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency27.82300.000323.4451159.6830AID743065; AID743067
tyrosine-protein kinase YesHomo sapiens (human)Potency21.76760.00005.018279.2586AID686947
nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency23.65830.000627.21521,122.0200AID743202; AID743219
nuclear receptor ROR-gamma isoform 1Mus musculus (house mouse)Potency31.62280.00798.23321,122.0200AID2551
Voltage-dependent calcium channel gamma-2 subunitMus musculus (house mouse)Potency31.78480.001557.789015,848.9004AID1259244
Cellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)Potency7.49780.002319.595674.0614AID651631
Glutamate receptor 2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency31.78480.001551.739315,848.9004AID1259244
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
ATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.63154.45319.3000AID1473740
Multidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.20005.677410.0000AID1473741
Bile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)54.45000.11007.190310.0000AID1443986; AID1473738
Estrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)Ki100.00000.00000.42297.9070AID257786
Glucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)Ki100.00000.00010.38637.0010AID257785
Progesterone receptorOryctolagus cuniculus (rabbit)IC50 (µMol)5.60000.44003.02005.6000AID578353; AID626474
Progesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)1.81900.00000.580710.0000AID162117
Glucocorticoid receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)320.00000.00010.39756.0000AID578355; AID626476
Androgen receptorHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)3.33710.00000.875310.0000AID1198071; AID1198072; AID1249995; AID1430111; AID1751744; AID1797749; AID1799354; AID1885040; AID1885078; AID1885121; AID241409; AID248278; AID248385; AID248615; AID248616; AID248693; AID248905; AID253471; AID257779; AID284206; AID284208; AID290229; AID301365; AID301367; AID316695; AID319590; AID319592; AID331662; AID38968; AID38975; AID38983; AID38985; AID38992; AID478366; AID478372; AID493501; AID493503; AID515859; AID539142; AID539145; AID639076; AID639077; AID639078; AID639152; AID639153; AID648200; AID648202; AID648203; AID720861; AID731982; AID731983; AID731984; AID731985; AID756280; AID777284; AID777285
Androgen receptorHomo sapiens (human)Ki0.49250.00020.42407.2000AID1233505; AID1249994; AID1797738; AID1797740; AID1797749; AID1800104; AID1872310; AID238631; AID238934; AID238961; AID239156; AID253455; AID257782; AID290231; AID316694; AID319591; AID331664; AID39001; AID39008; AID39147; AID493500
Androgen receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)53.93070.00101.979414.1600AID1569748; AID1797749; AID265578; AID276317; AID578352; AID626476
Androgen receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki1.55120.00031.21858.9270AID1751743; AID1797749; AID257783
Androgen receptorMus musculus (house mouse)IC50 (µMol)1.83500.00100.87503.0000AID527639; AID730424
Mineralocorticoid receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)680.00000.03980.86522.1000AID578356; AID626477
Testosterone 17-beta-dehydrogenase 3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.12000.00261.76469.3000AID639077
Progesterone receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)0.89000.89000.89000.8900AID1797749
Progesterone receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki3.60820.01403.60827.2000AID1797749; AID257784
Canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00002.41006.343310.0000AID1473739
ALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)Ki0.07000.00010.20143.7000AID1797738
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Activation Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Androgen receptorHomo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)5.92610.00000.20794.3000AID1199395; AID1199396; AID319588; AID38805; AID639154; AID639155; AID639156; AID648204; AID648205; AID731980; AID731981; AID754108; AID754109
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Other Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Androgen receptorHomo sapiens (human)EC5 (µMol)0.08500.00010.05120.2000AID478367; AID478368; AID539141
Androgen receptorHomo sapiens (human)FI50.48500.20000.54251.0000AID284207; AID301366
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (291)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
xenobiotic metabolic processATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin secretionMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cilium assemblyMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet degranulationMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cAMP transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
export across plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
fatty acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid biosynthetic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to oxidative stressBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to organic cyclic compoundBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
protein ubiquitinationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of fatty acid beta-oxidationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid signaling pathwayBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cholesterol homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to estrogenBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
lipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of bile acid secretionBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
antral ovarian follicle growthEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
epithelial cell developmentEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chromatin remodelingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
signal transductionEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cytosolic calcium ion concentrationEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
androgen metabolic processEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
male gonad developmentEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of phospholipase C activityEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular steroid hormone receptor signaling pathwayEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular estrogen receptor signaling pathwayEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to estradiolEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of toll-like receptor signaling pathwayEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of smooth muscle cell apoptotic processEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of canonical NF-kappaB signal transductionEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA-binding transcription factor activityEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to estrogenEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
fibroblast proliferationEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of fibroblast proliferationEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
stem cell differentiationEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of inflammatory responseEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-binding transcription factor activityEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II preinitiation complex assemblyEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
uterus developmentEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
vagina developmentEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
prostate epithelial cord elongationEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
prostate epithelial cord arborization involved in prostate glandular acinus morphogenesisEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of branching involved in prostate gland morphogenesisEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
mammary gland branching involved in pregnancyEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
mammary gland alveolus developmentEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
epithelial cell proliferation involved in mammary gland duct elongationEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein localization to chromatinEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to estradiol stimulusEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of miRNA transcriptionEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of epithelial cell apoptotic processEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to estrogen stimulusEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of gluconeogenesisGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chromatin organizationGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
apoptotic processGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chromosome segregationGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
signal transductionGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
glucocorticoid metabolic processGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
gene expressionGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
microglia differentiationGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adrenal gland developmentGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of glucocorticoid biosynthetic processGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
synaptic transmission, glutamatergicGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
maternal behaviorGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular glucocorticoid receptor signaling pathwayGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
glucocorticoid mediated signaling pathwayGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neuron apoptotic processGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
astrocyte differentiationGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cell divisionGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
mammary gland duct morphogenesisGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
motor behaviorGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to steroid hormone stimulusGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucocorticoid stimulusGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to dexamethasone stimulusGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to transforming growth factor beta stimulusGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neuroinflammatory responseGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular steroid hormone receptor signaling pathwayGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycle G2/M phase transitionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ER overload responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucose starvationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
in utero embryonic developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
somitogenesisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
release of cytochrome c from mitochondriaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
hematopoietic progenitor cell differentiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell proliferation involved in immune responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
B cell lineage commitmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell lineage commitmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to ischemiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleotide-excision repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
double-strand break repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein import into nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
autophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in cell cycle arrestCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in transcription of p21 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
Ras protein signal transductionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
gastrulationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
neuroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of neuroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein localizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA replicationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
determination of adult lifespanCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
rRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to salt stressCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to inorganic substanceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to X-rayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to gamma radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle cell apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cardiac muscle cell apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
glial cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
viral processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
glucose catabolic process to lactate via pyruvateCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cerebellum developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell growthCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitotic G1 DNA damage checkpoint signalingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of telomere maintenance via telomeraseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell differentiation in thymusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
tumor necrosis factor-mediated signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of tissue remodelingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to UVCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
multicellular organism growthCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of mitochondrial membrane permeabilityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucose starvationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
entrainment of circadian clock by photoperiodCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial DNA repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neuron apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription initiation-coupled chromatin remodelingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of proteolysisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of RNA polymerase II transcription preinitiation complex assemblyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to antibioticCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
fibroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of fibroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
circadian behaviorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
bone marrow developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
embryonic organ developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein stabilizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of helicase activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein tetramerizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromosome organizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
neuron apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
hematopoietic stem cell differentiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of glial cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
type II interferon-mediated signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac septum morphogenesisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of programmed necrotic cell deathCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complex assemblyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to endoplasmic reticulum stressCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
thymocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of thymocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
necroptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to hypoxiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to xenobiotic stimulusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to ionizing radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to gamma radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to UV-CCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
stem cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to actinomycin DCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of release of cytochrome c from mitochondriaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
replicative senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
oxidative stress-induced premature senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
oligodendrocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of execution phase of apoptosisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of mitophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of mitochondrial membrane permeability involved in apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of G1 to G0 transitionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of miRNA processingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of glucose catabolic process to lactate via pyruvateCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of pentose-phosphate shuntCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to hypoxiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of fibroblast apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of stem cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cellular senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ovulation from ovarian follicleProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
glandular epithelial cell maturationProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
signal transductionProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cell-cell signalingProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
paracrine signalingProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of phosphorylationProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
lung alveolus developmentProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of epithelial cell proliferationProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
progesterone receptor signaling pathwayProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
maintenance of protein location in nucleusProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
tertiary branching involved in mammary gland duct morphogenesisProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular steroid hormone receptor signaling pathwayProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
MAPK cascadeAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
in utero embryonic developmentAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of systemic arterial blood pressureAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
epithelial cell morphogenesisAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
transcription by RNA polymerase IIAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
signal transductionAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cell-cell signalingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
spermatogenesisAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
single fertilizationAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell population proliferationAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
male somatic sex determinationAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular estrogen receptor signaling pathwayAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
androgen receptor signaling pathwayAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular receptor signaling pathwayAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of intracellular estrogen receptor signaling pathwayAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
Leydig cell differentiationAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
multicellular organism growthAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of phosphorylationAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of MAPK cascadeAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of insulin-like growth factor receptor signaling pathwayAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell differentiationAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of integrin biosynthetic processAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of integrin biosynthetic processAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIIAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
insulin-like growth factor receptor signaling pathwayAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of developmental growthAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
animal organ formationAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
male genitalia morphogenesisAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
epithelial cell proliferationAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of epithelial cell proliferationAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of NF-kappaB transcription factor activityAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
activation of prostate induction by androgen receptor signaling pathwayAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
morphogenesis of an epithelial foldAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
lateral sprouting involved in mammary gland duct morphogenesisAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
prostate gland growthAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
prostate gland epithelium morphogenesisAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
epithelial cell differentiation involved in prostate gland developmentAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
tertiary branching involved in mammary gland duct morphogenesisAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
mammary gland alveolus developmentAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of epithelial cell proliferation involved in prostate gland developmentAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to steroid hormone stimulusAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to estrogen stimulusAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to testosterone stimulusAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
seminiferous tubule developmentAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
non-membrane-bounded organelle assemblyAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of protein localization to plasma membraneAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of extrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
male gonad developmentAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular steroid hormone receptor signaling pathwayAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
androgen biosynthetic processTestosterone 17-beta-dehydrogenase 3Homo sapiens (human)
male genitalia developmentTestosterone 17-beta-dehydrogenase 3Homo sapiens (human)
testosterone biosynthetic processTestosterone 17-beta-dehydrogenase 3Homo sapiens (human)
steroid biosynthetic processTestosterone 17-beta-dehydrogenase 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
heme catabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transepithelial transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein autophosphorylationALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
signal transductionALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor protein tyrosine kinase signaling pathwayALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
phosphorylationALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
hippocampus developmentALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adult behaviorALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
swimming behaviorALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
peptidyl-tyrosine autophosphorylationALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of apoptotic processALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein autophosphorylationALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neuron developmentALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of lipid catabolic processALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of NF-kappaB transcription factor activityALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of dopamine receptor signaling pathwayALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to environmental enrichmentALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
energy homeostasisALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of dendrite developmentALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of neuron differentiationALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell population proliferationALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
multicellular organism developmentALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of kinase activityALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (94)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
ATP bindingATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
icosanoid transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
purine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
efflux transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (NAD+) activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
TFIIB-class transcription factor bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
transcription coregulator bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
transcription corepressor bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
transcription coactivator bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chromatin bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activityEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear receptor activityEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
steroid bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
calmodulin bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
beta-catenin bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
TBP-class protein bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein kinase bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nitric-oxide synthase regulator activityEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear estrogen receptor activityEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear estrogen receptor bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
estrogen response element bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
ATPase bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
14-3-3 protein bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
sequence-specific double-stranded DNA bindingEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II transcription regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
core promoter sequence-specific DNA bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription repressor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activityGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
RNA bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear receptor activityGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear glucocorticoid receptor activityGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
steroid bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
TBP-class protein bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein kinase bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
Hsp90 protein bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
steroid hormone bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
sequence-specific double-stranded DNA bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
estrogen response element bindingGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
transcription cis-regulatory region bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
core promoter sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
TFIID-class transcription factor complex bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription repressor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protease bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
p53 bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromatin bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA 3'-UTR bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
copper ion bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
receptor tyrosine kinase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase regulator activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ATP-dependent DNA/DNA annealing activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein heterodimerization activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-folding chaperone bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein phosphatase 2A bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II-specific DNA-binding transcription factor bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
14-3-3 protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
MDM2/MDM4 family protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
disordered domain specific bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
general transcription initiation factor bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
molecular function activator activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
promoter-specific chromatin bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
transcription coactivator bindingProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear steroid receptor activityProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor activityProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
steroid bindingProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
ATPase bindingProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
estrogen response element bindingProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear receptor activityProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
transcription cis-regulatory region bindingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II general transcription initiation factor bindingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
transcription coactivator bindingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chromatin bindingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activityAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear receptor activityAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor activityAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
signaling receptor bindingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
steroid bindingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
androgen bindingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
beta-catenin bindingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
ATPase bindingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
molecular adaptor activityAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II-specific DNA-binding transcription factor bindingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
POU domain bindingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
molecular condensate scaffold activityAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
estrogen response element bindingAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
estradiol 17-beta-dehydrogenase [NAD(P)] activityTestosterone 17-beta-dehydrogenase 3Homo sapiens (human)
testosterone dehydrogenase [NAD(P)] activityTestosterone 17-beta-dehydrogenase 3Homo sapiens (human)
testosterone 17-beta-dehydrogenase (NADP+) activityTestosterone 17-beta-dehydrogenase 3Homo sapiens (human)
17-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (NADP+) activityTestosterone 17-beta-dehydrogenase 3Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein tyrosine kinase activityALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine kinase activityALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
heparin bindingALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
receptor signaling protein tyrosine kinase activator activityALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (43)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet dense granule membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
external side of apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosome membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
transcription regulator complexEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
membraneEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chromatinEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
euchromatinEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusEstrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial matrixGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
centrosomeGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
spindleGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
membraneGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear speckGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
synapseGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chromatinGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexGlucocorticoid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear bodyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
replication forkCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial matrixCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
centrosomeCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear matrixCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
PML bodyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription repressor complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
site of double-strand breakCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
germ cell nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromatinCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription regulator complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial outer membraneProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chromatinProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusProgesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear speckAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chromatinAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusAndrogen receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGlutamate receptor 2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)
endoplasmic reticulumTestosterone 17-beta-dehydrogenase 3Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneTestosterone 17-beta-dehydrogenase 3Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular membrane-bounded organelleTestosterone 17-beta-dehydrogenase 3Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumTestosterone 17-beta-dehydrogenase 3Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
receptor complexALK tyrosine kinase receptorHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (414)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID504812Inverse Agonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID504810Antagonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID588349qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression: Validation of Cytotoxic Assay
AID504836Inducers of the Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response (ERSR) in human glioma: Validation2002The Journal of biological chemistry, Apr-19, Volume: 277, Issue:16
Sustained ER Ca2+ depletion suppresses protein synthesis and induces activation-enhanced cell death in mast cells.
AID1508630Primary qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome: Secreted ER Calcium Modulated Protein (SERCaMP) assay2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID1347086qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Arenaviruses (LCMV): LCMV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347045Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr1) antagonism - Pilot counterscreen GloSensor control cell line2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID1347050Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr2) antagonism - Pilot subtype selectivity assay2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID1347083qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: Viability assay - alamar blue signal for LASV Primary Screen2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347049Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr1) antagonism - Pilot screen2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID588378qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression: Validation
AID686947qHTS for small molecule inhibitors of Yes1 kinase: Primary Screen2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-01, Volume: 23, Issue:15
Identification of potent Yes1 kinase inhibitors using a library screening approach.
AID1347082qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: LASV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID588212Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID248693Inhibition of androgen dependent human prostate cancer cell MDA-MB-PCa2b proliferation2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-17, Volume: 15, Issue:2
Structure based approach to the design of bicyclic-1H-isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione based androgen receptor antagonists.
AID670348Inhibition of actin based pseudopodia formation in androgen-dependent human LNCAP cells at 100 uM after 48 hrs by DAPI staining based fluorescence microscopy assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jul-01, Volume: 20, Issue:13
Antitumor agents 290. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of new LNCaP and PC-3 cytotoxic curcumin analogs conjugated with anti-androgens.
AID290231Binding affinity to human androgen receptor expressed in CV1 cells2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-15, Volume: 17, Issue:6
Discovery of an androgen receptor modulator pharmacophore based on 2-quinolinones.
AID700052Antagonist activity at AR co-activator binding domain expressed in african green monkey CV1 cells assessed as decrease in R1881-induced luciferase activity at <=40 uM relative to control2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 22, Issue:21
3,3'-Disubstituted bipolar biphenyls as inhibitors of nuclear receptor coactivator binding.
AID1635221Antiproliferative activity against human DU145 cells after 96 hrs by propidium iodide staining based fluorescence 2D monolayer assay2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-08, Volume: 118Design and synthesis of novel bicalutamide and enzalutamide derivatives as antiproliferative agents for the treatment of prostate cancer.
AID39322Relative binding affinity against rat ventral prostate androgen receptor using competition assay after 1 hour.1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 33, Issue:8
Antiandrogenic steroidal sulfonylpyrazoles.
AID639156Agonist activity at human androgen receptor W741C mutant expressed in COS7 cells assessed as luciferase activity after 24 hrs by reporter gene assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 20, Issue:1
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 4-phenylpyrrole derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID648214Anticancer activity against human LNCaP-hr cells xenografted in BALB/c athymic nude mouse assessed as prostate specific antigen level in plasma at 100 mg/kg, po qd after 28 days relative to control2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Apr-01, Volume: 20, Issue:7
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 4-arylmethyl-1-phenylpyrazole and 4-aryloxy-1-phenylpyrazole derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID478367Activity at human AR expressed in human HeLa cells after 48 hrs by transient-luciferase reporter gene assay2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 18, Issue:9
Structure-activity relationships of bioisosteric replacement of the carboxylic acid in novel androgen receptor pure antagonists.
AID253471Inhibition of mutant T877A Androgen receptor in human LNCaP cells2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-17, Volume: 15, Issue:2
Structure based approach to the design of bicyclic-1H-isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione based androgen receptor antagonists.
AID1199794Growth inhibition of human CWR22Rv1 cells by MTT assay2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 58, Issue:4
Novel C-4 heteroaryl 13-cis-retinamide Mnk/AR degrading agents inhibit cell proliferation and migration and induce apoptosis in human breast and prostate cancer cells and suppress growth of MDA-MB-231 human breast and CWR22Rv1 human prostate tumor xenogra
AID38829In vitro agonistic activity against human androgen receptor (hAR) expressed in CV-1 cells; not active1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-05, Volume: 9, Issue:7
Nonsteroidal androgen receptor agonists based on 4-(trifluoromethyl)-2H-pyrano[3,2-g]quinolin-2-one.
AID431978Activity in human PC3 cells expressing androgen receptor W741C mutant assessed as ARE-dependent transactivation at 1 uM after 24 hrs by luciferase reporter gene assay in absence of DHT2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-10, Volume: 52, Issue:17
Design and synthesis of androgen receptor antagonists with bulky side chains for overcoming antiandrogen resistance.
AID670343Antiproliferative activity against androgen-dependent human LNCAP cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jul-01, Volume: 20, Issue:13
Antitumor agents 290. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of new LNCaP and PC-3 cytotoxic curcumin analogs conjugated with anti-androgens.
AID578355Displacement of [3H]dexamethasone from Sprague-Dawley rat GR by liquid scintillation counting2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-15, Volume: 21, Issue:6
Design and synthesis of tricyclic tetrahydroquinolines as a new series of nonsteroidal selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs).
AID700382Antagonist activity at androgen receptor in human PC3 cells assessed as reduction in DHT-induced PSA expression at 2.5 uM incubated for 24 hrs by RT-PCR2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-26, Volume: 55, Issue:2
Antiandrogenic, maspin induction, and antiprostate cancer activities of tanshinone IIA and its novel derivatives with modification in ring A.
AID1329831In vivo antagonist activity at androgen receptor in immature rat prostate weight model assessed as testosterone propionate-induced weight of seminal vesicles over full body weight at 10 mg/kg, po qd administered for 4 days relative to testosterone propion2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 12-01, Volume: 26, Issue:23
[2.2.1]-Bicyclic sultams as potent androgen receptor antagonists.
AID319588Agonist activity at human androgen receptor african green monkey CV1 cells by cotransfection assay2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-01, Volume: 18, Issue:11
Discovery of a novel series of nonsteroidal androgen receptor modulators: 5- or 6-oxachrysen-2-ones.
AID1569749Agonist activity at GAL4-DBD fused rat androgen receptor expressed in UAS-bla 293 cells at 10 uM incubated for 16 hrs followed by fluorescence substrate addition and measured after 2 hrs by beta lactamase reporter gene assay relative to control2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-15, Volume: 180A new series of bicalutamide, enzalutamide and enobosarm derivatives carrying pentafluorosulfanyl (SF
AID625283Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for elevated liver function tests2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1569745Antiproliferative activity against human 22Rv1 cells assessed as reduction in cell growth incubated for 96 hrs by propidium iodide based 2D monolayer assay2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-15, Volume: 180A new series of bicalutamide, enzalutamide and enobosarm derivatives carrying pentafluorosulfanyl (SF
AID1635223Antiproliferative activity against human VCaP cells after 96 hrs by propidium iodide staining based fluorescence 2D monolayer assay2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-08, Volume: 118Design and synthesis of novel bicalutamide and enzalutamide derivatives as antiproliferative agents for the treatment of prostate cancer.
AID588219FDA HLAED, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID625280Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholecystitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID257783Inhibition of rat AR2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-26, Volume: 49, Issue:2
(+)-(2R,5S)-4-[4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-2,5-dimethyl-N-[6-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-3- yl]piperazine-1-carboxamide (YM580) as an orally potent and peripherally selective nonsteroidal androgen receptor antagonist.
AID319590Antagonist activity at human androgen receptor african green monkey CV1 cells by cotransfection assay2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-01, Volume: 18, Issue:11
Discovery of a novel series of nonsteroidal androgen receptor modulators: 5- or 6-oxachrysen-2-ones.
AID1569744Antiproliferative activity against human DU145 cells assessed as reduction in cell growth incubated for 96 hrs by propidium iodide based 2D monolayer assay2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-15, Volume: 180A new series of bicalutamide, enzalutamide and enobosarm derivatives carrying pentafluorosulfanyl (SF
AID1473940AUC in human at 50 mg, po QD after 24 hrs2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID588218FDA HLAED, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID639152Antagonist activity at human androgen receptor T877A mutant expressed in COS7 cells assessed as inhibition of DHT-induced luciferase activity after 24 hrs by reporter gene assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 20, Issue:1
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 4-phenylpyrrole derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID1233505Antagonist activity at androgen receptor (unknown origin)2015European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-24, Volume: 99Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel 5-oxo-2-thioxoimidazolidine derivatives as potent androgen receptor antagonists.
AID38809Agonistic activity against human androgen receptor (hAR) in co-transfected CV-1 cell1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-07, Volume: 8, Issue:7
New nonsteroidal androgen receptor modulators based on 4-(trifluoromethyl)-2(1H)-pyrrolidino[3,2-g] quinolinone.
AID1199396Displacement of [3H]R1881 from androgen receptor in human PC3 cells2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-12, Volume: 58, Issue:5
Discovery and development of Galeterone (TOK-001 or VN/124-1) for the treatment of all stages of prostate cancer.
AID731973Antitumor activity against human LNCaP-hr cells in BALB/c mouse xenograft model assessed as inhibition of tumor growth at 100 mg/kg, po qd for 28 days (Rvb = 100%)2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 21, Issue:1
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 3-aryl-3-hydroxy-1-phenylpyrrolidine derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID238934Inhibition of [3H]DHT binding to androgen receptor of MDA-453 cells2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-17, Volume: 15, Issue:2
Identification of a novel class of androgen receptor antagonists based on the bicyclic-1H-isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione nucleus.
AID639078Antagonist activity at human androgen receptor expressed in COS7 cells assessed as inhibition of DHT-induced luciferase activity after 24 hrs by reporter gene assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 20, Issue:1
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 4-phenylpyrrole derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID38968Antagonistic activity (IC50) against human androgen receptor (hAR) in co-transfected CV-1 cell1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-07, Volume: 8, Issue:7
New nonsteroidal androgen receptor modulators based on 4-(trifluoromethyl)-2(1H)-pyrrolidino[3,2-g] quinolinone.
AID700053Activation of AR co-activator binding domain expressed in african green monkey CV1 cells at <=40 uM relative to control2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 22, Issue:21
3,3'-Disubstituted bipolar biphenyls as inhibitors of nuclear receptor coactivator binding.
AID292743Reduction of testosterone-induced prostate weight increase in Sprague-Dawley rat by modified Hersherberger assay relative to control2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-01, Volume: 17, Issue:1
The discovery of a potent orally efficacious indole androgen receptor antagonist through in vivo screening.
AID625290Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver fatty2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID284206Displacement of [3H]mibolerone from androgen receptor expressed in CHOK1 cells2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 15, Issue:1
Discovery of 7alpha-substituted dihydrotestosterones as androgen receptor pure antagonists and their structure-activity relationships.
AID1249994Displacement of [3H]-DHT from androgen receptor in human MDA-MB-453 cells after 90 mins by TopCount analysis2015ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-13, Volume: 6, Issue:8
Discovery of BMS-641988, a Novel Androgen Receptor Antagonist for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer.
AID639077Displacement of [17-alpha-methyl-3H]-mibolerone from human androgen receptor T877A mutant expressed in HEK293 derived FreeStyle293F cells after 3 hrs2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 20, Issue:1
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 4-phenylpyrrole derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID482792Inhibition of prostate specific antigen secretion in human LNCAP cells expressing androgen receptor at 1.25 to 10 uM in presence of charcoal stripped serum2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-08, Volume: 53, Issue:7
Structure-activity relationship for thiohydantoin androgen receptor antagonists for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).
AID588215FDA HLAED, alkaline phosphatase increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID316705Drug level in human CWR22R cells xenografted mouse plasma at 50 mg/kg, po after 24 hrs on day 602008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Identification and optimization of a novel series of [2.2.1]-oxabicyclo imide-based androgen receptor antagonists.
AID588213Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in non-rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID1430112Antiproliferative activity against AR negative human PC3 cells after 48 hrs by MTT assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 03-01, Volume: 27, Issue:5
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of 2-(4-phenylthiazol-2-yl) isoindoline-1,3-dione derivatives as anti-prostate cancer agents.
AID1885060Antiproliferative activity against human LNCaP cells2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-14, Volume: 65, Issue:13
Therapeutic Strategies to Target the Androgen Receptor.
AID639256Toxicity in BALB/c mouse assessed as body weight at 20 mg/kg, po qd administered for 29 days measured on day 28 (Rvb = 17.6 +/- 0.4g)2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 20, Issue:1
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 4-phenylpyrrole derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID1473738Inhibition of human BSEP overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-taurocholate in presence of ATP measured after 15 to 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID482789Inhibition of prostate specific antigen expression in human LNCAP cells in presence of fetal bovine serum2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-08, Volume: 53, Issue:7
Structure-activity relationship for thiohydantoin androgen receptor antagonists for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).
AID540235Phospholipidosis-negative literature compound
AID1313182Antiproliferative activity against human 22Rv1 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability after 96 hrs by propidium iodide staining based fluorescence assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-01, Volume: 26, Issue:15
Rational design and synthesis of novel anti-prostate cancer agents bearing a 3,5-bis-trifluoromethylphenyl moiety.
AID301365Displacement of [3H]mibolerone from human androgen receptor expressed in CHOK1 cells2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-15, Volume: 17, Issue:20
Discovery and structure-activity relationships of new steroidal compounds bearing a carboxy-terminal side chain as androgen receptor pure antagonists.
AID1313184Antiproliferative activity against human LNCAP cells assessed as reduction in cell viability after 96 hrs by propidium iodide staining based fluorescence assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-01, Volume: 26, Issue:15
Rational design and synthesis of novel anti-prostate cancer agents bearing a 3,5-bis-trifluoromethylphenyl moiety.
AID162117Antagonistic activity against human progesterone receptor B (hPR-B) in co-transfected CV-1 cells.1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-12, Volume: 41, Issue:4
Synthesis and biological activity of a novel series of nonsteroidal, peripherally selective androgen receptor antagonists derived from 1,2-dihydropyridono[5,6-g]quinolines.
AID625292Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) combined score2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1473739Inhibition of human MRP2 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID478372Antagonist activity at AR in bicalutamide-resistant human LNCAP cells assessed as effect on cell proliferation after 6 days2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 18, Issue:9
Structure-activity relationships of bioisosteric replacement of the carboxylic acid in novel androgen receptor pure antagonists.
AID1443995Hepatotoxicity in human assessed as drug-induced liver injury2014Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), Sep, Volume: 60, Issue:3
Human drug-induced liver injury severity is highly associated with dual inhibition of liver mitochondrial function and bile salt export pump.
AID493505Effect on immature rat prostate weight in rat assessed as ratio of weight of seminal vesicles to full body weight at 10 mg/kg, po qd for 3 days relative to control2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-01, Volume: 20, Issue:15
Design and synthesis of 4-[3,5-dioxo-11-oxa-4,9-diazatricyclo[5.3.1.0(2,6)]undec-4-yl]-2-trifluoromethyl-benzonitriles as androgen receptor antagonists.
AID38827Efficacy as a function of maximal inhibition against human androgen receptor.1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-12, Volume: 41, Issue:4
Synthesis and biological activity of a novel series of nonsteroidal, peripherally selective androgen receptor antagonists derived from 1,2-dihydropyridono[5,6-g]quinolines.
AID1079935Cytolytic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is > 5 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CYTOL' in source]
AID1635252Antiproliferative activity against human 22Rv1 cells assessed as relative inhibition after 96 hrs by propidium iodide staining based fluorescence 2D monolayer assay2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-08, Volume: 118Design and synthesis of novel bicalutamide and enzalutamide derivatives as antiproliferative agents for the treatment of prostate cancer.
AID1885040Binding affinity to Androgen receptor (unknown origin)2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-14, Volume: 65, Issue:13
Therapeutic Strategies to Target the Androgen Receptor.
AID265578Inhibition of rat AR-mediated reporter gene expression in COS7 cells2006Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-15, Volume: 16, Issue:12
Discovery of indole-containing tetracycles as a new scaffold for androgen receptor ligands.
AID319592Activity at androgen receptor in human Saos2 cells assessed as IL6 repression2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-01, Volume: 18, Issue:11
Discovery of a novel series of nonsteroidal androgen receptor modulators: 5- or 6-oxachrysen-2-ones.
AID630712Antitumor activity against human LNCAP cells xenografted in athymic nude Harlan Sprague-Dawley mouse assessed as serum prostate specific antigen suppression at 10 mg/kg, po administered once daily for 5 weeks measured on week 3 by ELISA relative to vehicl2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-10, Volume: 54, Issue:21
Discovery of aryloxy tetramethylcyclobutanes as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID1635222Antiproliferative activity against human LNCAP cells after 96 hrs by propidium iodide staining based fluorescence 2D monolayer assay2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-08, Volume: 118Design and synthesis of novel bicalutamide and enzalutamide derivatives as antiproliferative agents for the treatment of prostate cancer.
AID588210Human drug-induced liver injury (DILI) modelling dataset from Ekins et al2010Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Dec, Volume: 38, Issue:12
A predictive ligand-based Bayesian model for human drug-induced liver injury.
AID588216FDA HLAED, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID482794Drug level in SCID mouse serum at 10 mg/kg, iv2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-08, Volume: 53, Issue:7
Structure-activity relationship for thiohydantoin androgen receptor antagonists for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).
AID639155Agonist activity at human androgen receptor T877A mutant expressed in COS7 cells assessed as luciferase activity after 24 hrs by reporter gene assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 20, Issue:1
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 4-phenylpyrrole derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID670341Cytotoxicity against androgen-dependent human LNCAP cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jul-01, Volume: 20, Issue:13
Antitumor agents 290. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of new LNCaP and PC-3 cytotoxic curcumin analogs conjugated with anti-androgens.
AID1569748Antagonist activity at GAL4-DBD fused rat androgen receptor expressed in UAS-bla 293 cells assessed as reduction in R1881-induced activation incubated for 16 hrs followed by fluorescence substrate addition and measured after 2 hrs by beta lactamase report2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-15, Volume: 180A new series of bicalutamide, enzalutamide and enobosarm derivatives carrying pentafluorosulfanyl (SF
AID244010Inhibition of [1-beta-2beta-3H]- -testosterone binding to human steroid 5-alpha-reductase type 2 of BPH tissue at 10 uM; - = not determined2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-21, Volume: 48, Issue:8
Novel C-17-heteroaryl steroidal CYP17 inhibitors/antiandrogens: synthesis, in vitro biological activity, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity in the LAPC4 human prostate cancer xenograft model.
AID39323Relative binding affinity against rat ventral prostate androgen receptor using competition assay after 18 hours.1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 33, Issue:8
Antiandrogenic steroidal sulfonylpyrazoles.
AID257797Half life in rat hypothalamus at 3 mg/kg, po2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-26, Volume: 49, Issue:2
(+)-(2R,5S)-4-[4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-2,5-dimethyl-N-[6-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-3- yl]piperazine-1-carboxamide (YM580) as an orally potent and peripherally selective nonsteroidal androgen receptor antagonist.
AID639171Antitumor activity against human JDCaP cells expressing wild type AR xenografted in testosterone propionate-challenged castrated BALB/c nude mouse assessed as decrease in tumor volume at 20 mg/kg, po bid administered for 29 days measured on day 28 (Rvb = 2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 20, Issue:1
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 4-phenylpyrrole derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID1569747Antiproliferative activity against human VCaP cells assessed as reduction in cell growth incubated for 96 hrs by propidium iodide based 2D monolayer assay2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-15, Volume: 180A new series of bicalutamide, enzalutamide and enobosarm derivatives carrying pentafluorosulfanyl (SF
AID38985In vitro binding affinity at human androgen receptor transfected into COS cells.1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-05, Volume: 9, Issue:7
Nonsteroidal androgen receptor agonists based on 4-(trifluoromethyl)-2H-pyrano[3,2-g]quinolin-2-one.
AID588217FDA HLAED, serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID1473741Inhibition of human MRP4 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1079946Presence of at least one case with successful reintroduction. [column 'REINT' in source]
AID639254Antitumor activity against human LNCaP-FGC cells expressing androgen receptor W741C/T887A mutant xenografted in castrated BALB/c nude mouse assessed as decrease in prostate specific antigen level in plasma at 20 mg/kg, po qd administered for 29 days measu2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 20, Issue:1
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 4-phenylpyrrole derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID639154Agonist activity at human androgen receptor expressed in COS7 cells assessed as luciferase activity after 24 hrs by reporter gene assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 20, Issue:1
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 4-phenylpyrrole derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID1329841Toxicity in BALB/c athymic mouse xenografted with bicalutamide-resistant human CWR22-BMSLD1 cells at 150 mg/kg, po qd for 20 days2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 12-01, Volume: 26, Issue:23
[2.2.1]-Bicyclic sultams as potent androgen receptor antagonists.
AID319589Agonist activity at human androgen receptor african green monkey CV1 cells by cotransfection assay relative to DHT2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-01, Volume: 18, Issue:11
Discovery of a novel series of nonsteroidal androgen receptor modulators: 5- or 6-oxachrysen-2-ones.
AID1708708Antiproliferative activity against human LNCaP cells assessed as reduction in cell viability2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 03-15, Volume: 36Synthesis, biological evaluation and X-ray analysis of bicalutamide sulfoxide analogues for the potential treatment of prostate cancer.
AID648289Cytotoxicity against human androgen-independent PC3 cells by MTT assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-01, Volume: 22, Issue:5
1,2,4-Oxadiazoles: a new class of anti-prostate cancer agents.
AID257789Half life in rat plasma at 3 mg/kg, po2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-26, Volume: 49, Issue:2
(+)-(2R,5S)-4-[4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-2,5-dimethyl-N-[6-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-3- yl]piperazine-1-carboxamide (YM580) as an orally potent and peripherally selective nonsteroidal androgen receptor antagonist.
AID331662Antagonist activity at human androgen receptor in CV1 cells by transcriptional activation assay2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-01, Volume: 18, Issue:9
Selective androgen receptor modulators based on a series of 7H-[1,4]oxazino[3,2-g]quinolin-7-ones with improved in vivo activity.
AID38832Percent maximal inhibition against human androgen receptor (AR) dependent transcriptional activity in co-transfected mammalian CV-1 cells2000Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-06, Volume: 10, Issue:5
Effects of isosteric pyridone replacements in androgen receptor antagonists based on 1,2-dihydro- and 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-2,2-dimethyl-6-trifluoromethyl-8-pyridono[5,6-g]quin olines.
AID539157Antitumor activity against human bicalutamide-resistant LNCAP cells xenografted in SCID mouse assessed as inhibition of tumor growth at 100 mg/kg, po qd for seven cycles of 5 days on, 2 days off2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 18, Issue:23
Design and synthesis of an androgen receptor pure antagonist (CH5137291) for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer.
AID700381Antagonist activity at androgen receptor in human PC3 cells assessed as increase in Maspin expression at 2.5 uM incubated for 24 hrs in presence of DHT by RT-PCR2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-26, Volume: 55, Issue:2
Antiandrogenic, maspin induction, and antiprostate cancer activities of tanshinone IIA and its novel derivatives with modification in ring A.
AID1408589Displacement of Fluormone-DHT from rat GST-tagged rat AR LBD expressed in insect cells at 1 to 10 uM after 4 hrs by fluorescence polarization assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-05, Volume: 157Small molecule-induced degradation of the full length and V7 truncated variant forms of human androgen receptor.
AID294971Reduction of prostate weight in orally dosed immature rat2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-01, Volume: 17, Issue:9
beta-Alkylthio indolyl carbinols: potent nonsteroidal antiandrogens with oral efficacy in a prostate cancer model.
AID301367Antagonist activity at human androgen receptor expressed in HeLa cells assessed as inhibition of dihydrotestosterone induced transcriptional activity by reporter gene assay2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-15, Volume: 17, Issue:20
Discovery and structure-activity relationships of new steroidal compounds bearing a carboxy-terminal side chain as androgen receptor pure antagonists.
AID284208Antagonist activity at androgen receptor expressed in HeLa cells assessed as inhibition of dihydrotestosterone-induced transcriptional activity by reporter gene assay2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 15, Issue:1
Discovery of 7alpha-substituted dihydrotestosterones as androgen receptor pure antagonists and their structure-activity relationships.
AID1250035Antitumor activity against human CWR22 cells in Balb/c athymic (nu/nu) mouse CWR22-BMSLD1 prostate cancer xenograft model assessed as tumor growth inhibition at 150 mg/kg, po qd administered for 35 days measured from day 10 to 35 during compound dosing2015ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-13, Volume: 6, Issue:8
Discovery of BMS-641988, a Novel Androgen Receptor Antagonist for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer.
AID1079940Granulomatous liver disease, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'GRAN' in source]
AID539145Antagonist activity at AR in human bicalutamide-resistant LNCAP cells assessed as inhibition of cell proliferation after 6 days2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 18, Issue:23
Design and synthesis of an androgen receptor pure antagonist (CH5137291) for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer.
AID319591Binding affinity to human androgen receptor expressed in monkey COS7 cells by whole cell binding assay2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-01, Volume: 18, Issue:11
Discovery of a novel series of nonsteroidal androgen receptor modulators: 5- or 6-oxachrysen-2-ones.
AID648205Agonist activity at androgen receptor T877A mutant expressed in Cos7 cells after 24 hrs by luciferase reporter gene assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Apr-01, Volume: 20, Issue:7
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 4-arylmethyl-1-phenylpyrazole and 4-aryloxy-1-phenylpyrazole derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID731976Antitumor activity against human LNCaP-hr cells in BALB/c mouse xenograft model assessed as plasma prostate specific antigen level at 100 mg/kg, po qd for 28 days by ELISA (Rvb = 23.8 +/- 6.1 ng/ml)2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 21, Issue:1
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 3-aryl-3-hydroxy-1-phenylpyrrolidine derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID316698AUC (0 to 6 hrs) in BALB/c mouse at 1.0 mmol/kg, po2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Identification and optimization of a novel series of [2.2.1]-oxabicyclo imide-based androgen receptor antagonists.
AID1329839Antitumor activity against bicalutamide-resistant human CWR22-BMSLD1 cells xenografted in BALB/c athymic mouse assessed as tumor growth inhibition at 150 mg/kg, po qd for 20 days measured on last day of dosing relative to control2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 12-01, Volume: 26, Issue:23
[2.2.1]-Bicyclic sultams as potent androgen receptor antagonists.
AID588214FDA HLAED, liver enzyme composite activity2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID1079932Highest frequency of moderate liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% BIOL' in source]
AID588208Literature-mined public compounds from Lowe et al phospholipidosis modelling dataset2010Molecular pharmaceutics, Oct-04, Volume: 7, Issue:5
Predicting phospholipidosis using machine learning.
AID1199793Growth inhibition of human LNCAP cells by MTT assay2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 58, Issue:4
Novel C-4 heteroaryl 13-cis-retinamide Mnk/AR degrading agents inhibit cell proliferation and migration and induce apoptosis in human breast and prostate cancer cells and suppress growth of MDA-MB-231 human breast and CWR22Rv1 human prostate tumor xenogra
AID630802Antitumor activity against human LNCAP cells xenografted in athymic nude Harlan Sprague-Dawley mouse assessed as tumor volume inhibition at 10 mg/kg, po administered once daily for 5 weeks measured after 5 weeks relative to vehicle treated control2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-10, Volume: 54, Issue:21
Discovery of aryloxy tetramethylcyclobutanes as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID648200Displacement of [17-alpha-methyl-3H]mibolerone from androgen receptor expressed in HEK293 cells after 3 hrs2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Apr-01, Volume: 20, Issue:7
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 4-arylmethyl-1-phenylpyrazole and 4-aryloxy-1-phenylpyrazole derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID720861Inhibition of BF3 site of androgen receptor in enzalutamide-resistant human LNCAP cells assessed as reduction in PSA level after 3 days2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 56, Issue:3
Targeting the binding function 3 (BF3) site of the androgen receptor through virtual screening. 2. development of 2-((2-phenoxyethyl) thio)-1H-benzimidazole derivatives.
AID1636382Drug activation in human Hep3B cells assessed as human CYP3A4-mediated drug metabolism-induced cytotoxicity measured as decrease in cell viability at 14 uM pre-incubated with BSO for 18 hrs followed by incubation with compound for 3 hrs in presence of NAD2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 26, Issue:16
Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
AID1249996In vivo antagonist activity at androgen receptor in immature Sprague-Dawley rat prostate weight model assessed as testosterone propionate-induced weight of seminal vesicles over full body weight at 1 mg/kg, po qd administered for 4 days2015ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-13, Volume: 6, Issue:8
Discovery of BMS-641988, a Novel Androgen Receptor Antagonist for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer.
AID1636494Drug activation in human Hep3B cells assessed as human CYP2C9-mediated drug metabolism-induced cytotoxicity measured as decrease in cell viability at 224.2 uM pre-incubated with BSO for 18 hrs followed by incubation with compound for 3 hrs in presence of 2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 26, Issue:16
Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
AID176507Antiandrogen activity in male rats1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr, Volume: 31, Issue:4
Resolution of the nonsteroidal antiandrogen 4'-cyano-3-[(4-fluorophenyl)sulfonyl]-2-hydroxy-2-methyl-3'- (trifluoromethyl)-propionanilide and the determination of the absolute configuration of the active enantiomer.
AID1443991Induction of mitochondrial dysfunction in Sprague-Dawley rat liver mitochondria assessed as inhibition of mitochondrial respiration per mg mitochondrial protein measured for 20 mins by A65N-1 oxygen probe based fluorescence assay2014Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), Sep, Volume: 60, Issue:3
Human drug-induced liver injury severity is highly associated with dual inhibition of liver mitochondrial function and bile salt export pump.
AID1313185Antiproliferative activity against human VCaP cells assessed as reduction in cell viability after 96 hrs by propidium iodide staining based fluorescence assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-01, Volume: 26, Issue:15
Rational design and synthesis of novel anti-prostate cancer agents bearing a 3,5-bis-trifluoromethylphenyl moiety.
AID493503Antagonist activity at wild type human AR expressed in human LNCAP cells by transactivation assay2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-01, Volume: 20, Issue:15
Design and synthesis of 4-[3,5-dioxo-11-oxa-4,9-diazatricyclo[5.3.1.0(2,6)]undec-4-yl]-2-trifluoromethyl-benzonitriles as androgen receptor antagonists.
AID1168322Growth inhibition of human PC3 cells2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 24, Issue:21
Synthesis and preliminary investigations into novel 1,2,3-triazole-derived androgen receptor antagonists inspired by bicalutamide.
AID38805In vitro antagonistic activity against human androgen receptor (hAR) expressed in CV-1 cells1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-05, Volume: 9, Issue:7
Nonsteroidal androgen receptor agonists based on 4-(trifluoromethyl)-2H-pyrano[3,2-g]quinolin-2-one.
AID539151Inhibition of human ERG at 10 uM by whole cell patch-clamp technique2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 18, Issue:23
Design and synthesis of an androgen receptor pure antagonist (CH5137291) for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer.
AID176392Antiandrogenic activity as the dose required to inhibit testosterone propionate-induced rat ventral prostate weight gain in castrated immature rat by 50%.1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 33, Issue:8
Antiandrogenic steroidal sulfonylpyrazoles.
AID730424Antagonist activity at androgen receptor in androgen-dependent mouse SC3 cells assessed as inhibition of testosterone-induced cell growth after 3 days2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Apr-01, Volume: 21, Issue:7
Development of silicon-containing bis-phenol derivatives as androgen receptor antagonists: selectivity switching by C/Si exchange.
AID478366Displacement of [3H]mibolerone from human AR expressed in CHO-K1 cells after 2 hrs by scintillation counting2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 18, Issue:9
Structure-activity relationships of bioisosteric replacement of the carboxylic acid in novel androgen receptor pure antagonists.
AID639250Antitumor activity against human LNCaP-FGC cells expressing androgen receptor W741C/T887A mutant xenografted in castrated BALB/c nude mouse assessed as effect on tumor volume at 20 mg/kg, po qd administered for 29 days measured on day 28 (Rvb = 402 +/- 472012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 20, Issue:1
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 4-phenylpyrrole derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID1198074Agonist activity at pSG5-tagged human androgen receptor T877A mutant expressed in COS1 cells assessed as receptor-mediated transcriptional activity by AR-regulated rat probasin promoter fragment driven firefly luciferase reporter assay relative to control2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-12, Volume: 58, Issue:3
Synthesis and biological evaluation of second-generation tropanol-based androgen receptor modulators.
AID1199795Growth inhibition of human PC3 cells by MTT assay2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 58, Issue:4
Novel C-4 heteroaryl 13-cis-retinamide Mnk/AR degrading agents inhibit cell proliferation and migration and induce apoptosis in human breast and prostate cancer cells and suppress growth of MDA-MB-231 human breast and CWR22Rv1 human prostate tumor xenogra
AID257794Oral clearance in rat ventral prostate at 3 mg/kg, po2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-26, Volume: 49, Issue:2
(+)-(2R,5S)-4-[4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-2,5-dimethyl-N-[6-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-3- yl]piperazine-1-carboxamide (YM580) as an orally potent and peripherally selective nonsteroidal androgen receptor antagonist.
AID284207Agonist activity at androgen receptor expressed in HeLa cells assessed as effect on dihydrotestosterone-induced transcriptional activity by reporter gene assay2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 15, Issue:1
Discovery of 7alpha-substituted dihydrotestosterones as androgen receptor pure antagonists and their structure-activity relationships.
AID700379Antagonist activity at androgen receptor in human LNCaP cells assessed as reduction in DHT-induced PSA expression at 1 uM by luciferase reporter gene assay2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-26, Volume: 55, Issue:2
Antiandrogenic, maspin induction, and antiprostate cancer activities of tanshinone IIA and its novel derivatives with modification in ring A.
AID1474167Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring verified drug-induced liver injury concern status2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID38975Antagonistic activity against human androgen receptor (hAR) in co-transfected CV-1 cells.1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-12, Volume: 41, Issue:4
Synthesis and biological activity of a novel series of nonsteroidal, peripherally selective androgen receptor antagonists derived from 1,2-dihydropyridono[5,6-g]quinolines.
AID626476Displacement of [3H]Dex from glucocorticoid receptor in Sprague-Dawley rat liver after 2 hrs by liquid scintillation counting2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 21, Issue:21
Tetrahydroquinolines as a novel series of nonsteroidal selective androgen receptor modulators: structural requirements for better physicochemical and biological properties.
AID1079948Times to onset, minimal and maximal, observed in the indexed observations. [column 'DELAI' in source]
AID1079931Moderate liver toxicity, defined via clinical-chemistry results: ALT or AST serum activity 6 times the normal upper limit (N) or alkaline phosphatase serum activity of 1.7 N. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'BIOL' in source]
AID539149AUC in mouse at 10 mg/kg, po using 5% arabic gum as vehicle2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 18, Issue:23
Design and synthesis of an androgen receptor pure antagonist (CH5137291) for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer.
AID248615Inhibition of human androgen receptor of breast carcinoma MDA-453 cells in reporter gene assay2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-17, Volume: 15, Issue:2
Identification of a novel class of androgen receptor antagonists based on the bicyclic-1H-isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione nucleus.
AID244022Inhibition of [1-beta-3H]-androstenedione binding to human steroid 5-alpha-reductase type I expressed in DU-145 cells at 10 uM; - = not determined2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-21, Volume: 48, Issue:8
Novel C-17-heteroaryl steroidal CYP17 inhibitors/antiandrogens: synthesis, in vitro biological activity, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity in the LAPC4 human prostate cancer xenograft model.
AID184812Effect of compound on LH level on 14-day dosing in intact rats 25 mg/kg1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 31, Issue:5
Nonsteroidal antiandrogens. Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of 3-substituted derivatives of 2-hydroxypropionanilides.
AID756280Inhibition of androgen receptor in human LNCAP cells after 1 day by luciferase reporter gene assay2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-01, Volume: 23, Issue:13
Discovery of non-LBD inhibitor for androgen receptor by structure-guide design.
AID1751743Inhibition of [3H] MIB binding to rat prostate androgen receptor LBD by competitive binding assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 08-12, Volume: 64, Issue:15
Exploration and Biological Evaluation of Basic Heteromonocyclic Propanamide Derivatives as SARDs for the Treatment of Enzalutamide-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
AID276462Inhibition of seminal vesicle weight in Sprague-Dawley rat at 2 mg/day, po relative to control2006Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-15, Volume: 16, Issue:22
Synthesis and SAR of novel hydantoin derivatives as selective androgen receptor modulators.
AID257799Effect on ventral prostate weight with reference to control in Wistar rat at 100 mg/kg/day2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-26, Volume: 49, Issue:2
(+)-(2R,5S)-4-[4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-2,5-dimethyl-N-[6-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-3- yl]piperazine-1-carboxamide (YM580) as an orally potent and peripherally selective nonsteroidal androgen receptor antagonist.
AID1430111Antagonist activity at AR T877A mutant in human LNCAP cells assessed as inhibition of DHT-induced proliferation after 48 hrs by MTT assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 03-01, Volume: 27, Issue:5
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of 2-(4-phenylthiazol-2-yl) isoindoline-1,3-dione derivatives as anti-prostate cancer agents.
AID700390Agonist activity at androgen receptor W741C mutant expressed in human PC3 cells assessed as stimulation of receptor transactivation at 0.1 to 1 uM by luciferase reporter gene assay2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-26, Volume: 55, Issue:2
Antiandrogenic, maspin induction, and antiprostate cancer activities of tanshinone IIA and its novel derivatives with modification in ring A.
AID38983In vitro agonistic activity against human androgen receptor (hAR) expressed in CV-1 cells; not active1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-05, Volume: 9, Issue:7
Nonsteroidal androgen receptor agonists based on 4-(trifluoromethyl)-2H-pyrano[3,2-g]quinolin-2-one.
AID1324636Agonist activity at AR W741C/T877A double mutant (unknown origin) expressed in human PC3 cells assessed as receptor transactivation at 5 uM after 24 hrs by PSA-luciferase reporter gene assay2016ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-08, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Identification of Triptophenolide from
AID1079947Comments (NB not yet translated). [column 'COMMENTAIRES' in source]
AID1313183Antiproliferative activity against human DU145 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability after 96 hrs by propidium iodide staining based fluorescence assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-01, Volume: 26, Issue:15
Rational design and synthesis of novel anti-prostate cancer agents bearing a 3,5-bis-trifluoromethylphenyl moiety.
AID539156Antitumor activity against human bicalutamide-resistant LNCAP cells xenografted in SCID mouse assessed as inhibition of tumor growth at 10 mg/kg, po qd for seven cycles of 5 days on, 2 days off2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 18, Issue:23
Design and synthesis of an androgen receptor pure antagonist (CH5137291) for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer.
AID1249998Plasma concentration in immature Sprague-Dawley rat prostate weight model at 1 mg/kg, po qd administered for 4 days measured 2 hrs post last dose on day 42015ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-13, Volume: 6, Issue:8
Discovery of BMS-641988, a Novel Androgen Receptor Antagonist for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer.
AID625285Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic necrosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID578356Displacement of [3H]aldosterone from Sprague-Dawley rat MR by liquid scintillation counting2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-15, Volume: 21, Issue:6
Design and synthesis of tricyclic tetrahydroquinolines as a new series of nonsteroidal selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs).
AID1079933Acute liver toxicity defined via clinical observations and clear clinical-chemistry results: serum ALT or AST activity > 6 N or serum alkaline phosphatases activity > 1.7 N. This category includes cytolytic, choleostatic and mixed liver toxicity. Value is
AID183961Androgenic activity as percent increase in rat ventral prostate (castrated immature rat) weight caused by 100 mg/kg per day x 10 oral dose; Not significant1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 33, Issue:8
Antiandrogenic steroidal sulfonylpyrazoles.
AID777284Antagonist activity at androgen receptor H874Y mutant (unknown origin) expressed in human 22Rv1 cells assessed as inhibition of DHT-induced cell growth after 3 days by WST-8 assay2013ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-10, Volume: 4, Issue:10
Design and Synthesis of 4-(4-Benzoylaminophenoxy)phenol Derivatives As Androgen Receptor Antagonists.
AID777285Antagonist activity at androgen receptor T877A mutant (unknown origin) expressed in human LNCAP cells assessed as inhibition of DHT-induced cell growth after 6 days by WST-8 assay2013ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-10, Volume: 4, Issue:10
Design and Synthesis of 4-(4-Benzoylaminophenoxy)phenol Derivatives As Androgen Receptor Antagonists.
AID1079941Liver damage due to vascular disease: peliosis hepatitis, hepatic veno-occlusive disease, Budd-Chiari syndrome. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'VASC' in source]
AID242071In vitro inhibitory concentration against Cytochrome P450 17 expressed in E. coli; - = not determined2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-21, Volume: 48, Issue:8
Novel C-17-heteroaryl steroidal CYP17 inhibitors/antiandrogens: synthesis, in vitro biological activity, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity in the LAPC4 human prostate cancer xenograft model.
AID754109Displacement of [3H]R1881 from AR in human MDA-MB-453 cells2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-27, Volume: 56, Issue:12
Systematic structure modifications of multitarget prostate cancer drug candidate galeterone to produce novel androgen receptor down-regulating agents as an approach to treatment of advanced prostate cancer.
AID276317Displacement of [3H]R1881 from rat androgen receptor2006Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 16, Issue:21
A bioisosteric approach to the discovery of indole carbinol androgen receptor ligands.
AID257787Cmax in rat plasma at 3 mg/kg, po2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-26, Volume: 49, Issue:2
(+)-(2R,5S)-4-[4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-2,5-dimethyl-N-[6-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-3- yl]piperazine-1-carboxamide (YM580) as an orally potent and peripherally selective nonsteroidal androgen receptor antagonist.
AID257790Oral clearance in rat at 3 mg/kg, po2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-26, Volume: 49, Issue:2
(+)-(2R,5S)-4-[4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-2,5-dimethyl-N-[6-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-3- yl]piperazine-1-carboxamide (YM580) as an orally potent and peripherally selective nonsteroidal androgen receptor antagonist.
AID626482Displacement of [3H]testosterone from androgen receptor in Sprague-Dawley rat prostate gland after 2 hrs by liquid scintillation counting2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 21, Issue:21
Tetrahydroquinolines as a novel series of nonsteroidal selective androgen receptor modulators: structural requirements for better physicochemical and biological properties.
AID478371Agonist activity at AR in bicalutamide-resistant human LNCAP cells assessed as effect on cell proliferation after 6 days2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 18, Issue:9
Structure-activity relationships of bioisosteric replacement of the carboxylic acid in novel androgen receptor pure antagonists.
AID290229Antagonist activity at human androgen receptor expressed in CV1 cells2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-15, Volume: 17, Issue:6
Discovery of an androgen receptor modulator pharmacophore based on 2-quinolinones.
AID331664Displacement of [3H]DHT from human Androgen receptor in human MDA-MB-453 cells2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-01, Volume: 18, Issue:9
Selective androgen receptor modulators based on a series of 7H-[1,4]oxazino[3,2-g]quinolin-7-ones with improved in vivo activity.
AID625291Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver function tests abnormal2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1140401Antagonist activity at androgen receptor in human LNCAP cells assessed as inhibition of androgen-stimulated cell growth at 20 uM measured every 3 days relative to dihydrotestosterone2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 22, Issue:9
Preliminary investigations into triazole derived androgen receptor antagonists.
AID1079945Animal toxicity known. [column 'TOXIC' in source]
AID1199397Growth inhibition of human castration-resistant prostate cancer cells2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-12, Volume: 58, Issue:5
Discovery and development of Galeterone (TOK-001 or VN/124-1) for the treatment of all stages of prostate cancer.
AID1291240Antiproliferative activity against human 22Rv1 cells after 96 hrs by Oncotest monolayer assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-15, Volume: 26, Issue:8
7-Substituted umbelliferone derivatives as androgen receptor antagonists for the potential treatment of prostate and breast cancer.
AID493501Antagonist activity at human wild type AR expressed in human MDA-MB-435 cells by transactivation assay2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-01, Volume: 20, Issue:15
Design and synthesis of 4-[3,5-dioxo-11-oxa-4,9-diazatricyclo[5.3.1.0(2,6)]undec-4-yl]-2-trifluoromethyl-benzonitriles as androgen receptor antagonists.
AID1635253Antiproliferative activity against human VCaP cells assessed as relative inhibition after 96 hrs by propidium iodide staining based fluorescence 2D monolayer assay2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-08, Volume: 118Design and synthesis of novel bicalutamide and enzalutamide derivatives as antiproliferative agents for the treatment of prostate cancer.
AID539158Inhibition of prostate specific antigen production in human bicalutamide-resistant LNCAP cells xenografted SCID mouse at 10 mg/kg, po qd for seven cycles of 5 days on and 2 days off measured on day 172010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 18, Issue:23
Design and synthesis of an androgen receptor pure antagonist (CH5137291) for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer.
AID1708709Antiproliferative activity against human VCaP cells assessed as reduction in cell viability2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 03-15, Volume: 36Synthesis, biological evaluation and X-ray analysis of bicalutamide sulfoxide analogues for the potential treatment of prostate cancer.
AID731984Inhibition of Androgen receptor T877A mutant (unknown origin) expressed in Freestyle293F cells2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 21, Issue:1
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 3-aryl-3-hydroxy-1-phenylpyrrolidine derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID257795Cmax in rat hypothalamus at 3 mg/kg, po2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-26, Volume: 49, Issue:2
(+)-(2R,5S)-4-[4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-2,5-dimethyl-N-[6-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-3- yl]piperazine-1-carboxamide (YM580) as an orally potent and peripherally selective nonsteroidal androgen receptor antagonist.
AID731980Agonist activity at Androgen receptor T877A mutant in human LNCaP-hr cells assessed as prostate specific antigen secretion measured after 3 days by enzyme-immunoassay2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 21, Issue:1
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 3-aryl-3-hydroxy-1-phenylpyrrolidine derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID301366Agonist activity at human androgen receptor expressed in HeLa cells assessed as five times increase in transcriptional activity by reporter gene assay2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-15, Volume: 17, Issue:20
Discovery and structure-activity relationships of new steroidal compounds bearing a carboxy-terminal side chain as androgen receptor pure antagonists.
AID731982Antagonist activity at Androgen receptor T877A mutant (unknown origin) expressed in human Cos-7 cells co-expressing pGL3-MMTV-luc vector assessed as luciferase activity by reporter gene assay2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 21, Issue:1
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 3-aryl-3-hydroxy-1-phenylpyrrolidine derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID1079938Chronic liver disease either proven histopathologically, or through a chonic elevation of serum amino-transferase activity after 6 months. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHRON' in source]
AID625287Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatomegaly2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1250034Antitumor activity against human CWR22 cells in Balb/c athymic (nu/nu) mouse CWR22-BMSLD1 prostate cancer xenograft model assessed as tumor growth inhibition at 150 mg/kg, po qd measured for 10 days during compound dosing2015ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-13, Volume: 6, Issue:8
Discovery of BMS-641988, a Novel Androgen Receptor Antagonist for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer.
AID588209Literature-mined public compounds from Greene et al multi-species hepatotoxicity modelling dataset2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jul-19, Volume: 23, Issue:7
Developing structure-activity relationships for the prediction of hepatotoxicity.
AID648204Agonist activity at androgen receptor expressed in Cos7 cells after 24 hrs by luciferase reporter gene assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Apr-01, Volume: 20, Issue:7
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 4-arylmethyl-1-phenylpyrazole and 4-aryloxy-1-phenylpyrazole derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID777282Cytotoxicity against human PC3 cells assessed as growth inhibition after 3 days by WST-8 assay2013ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-10, Volume: 4, Issue:10
Design and Synthesis of 4-(4-Benzoylaminophenoxy)phenol Derivatives As Androgen Receptor Antagonists.
AID257780Effect on ventral prostate weight with reference to control in Wistar rat at 10 mg/kg/day, po2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-26, Volume: 49, Issue:2
(+)-(2R,5S)-4-[4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-2,5-dimethyl-N-[6-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-3- yl]piperazine-1-carboxamide (YM580) as an orally potent and peripherally selective nonsteroidal androgen receptor antagonist.
AID578353Displacement of [3H]progesterone from rabbit PR by liquid scintillation counting2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-15, Volume: 21, Issue:6
Design and synthesis of tricyclic tetrahydroquinolines as a new series of nonsteroidal selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs).
AID625279Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for bilirubinemia2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID630792Kinetic solubility of the compound at pH 7.42011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-10, Volume: 54, Issue:21
Discovery of aryloxy tetramethylcyclobutanes as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID176903Peroral dose inhibiting testosterone propionate (subcutaneous administration) induced rat ventral prostate weight gain by 50%1992Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 35, Issue:10
Antiandrogenic steroidal sulfonyl heterocycles. Utility of electrostatic complementarity in defining bioisosteric sulfonyl heterocycles.
AID756281Cytotoxicity against human LNCAP cells assessed as cell viability after 2 days by cell counting method2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-01, Volume: 23, Issue:13
Discovery of non-LBD inhibitor for androgen receptor by structure-guide design.
AID1329835Plasma concentration in immature rat prostate weight model at 10 mg/kg, po qd administered for 4 days measured 2 hrs post last dose on day 42016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 12-01, Volume: 26, Issue:23
[2.2.1]-Bicyclic sultams as potent androgen receptor antagonists.
AID1473941Drug concentration at steady state in human at 50 mg, po QD after 24 hrs2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID626475Displacement of [3H]E2 from estrogen receptor in JW rabbit uterus after 2 hrs by liquid scintillation counting2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 21, Issue:21
Tetrahydroquinolines as a novel series of nonsteroidal selective androgen receptor modulators: structural requirements for better physicochemical and biological properties.
AID238631Binding affinity for androgen receptor in human MDA-453 cells2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-17, Volume: 15, Issue:2
Structure based approach to the design of bicyclic-1H-isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione based androgen receptor antagonists.
AID515859Antagonist activity at human androgen receptor expressed in human CV1 cells assessed as inhibition of receptor-mediated transactivation by MMTV-luciferase reporter gene assay2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Oct-01, Volume: 18, Issue:19
20-Aminosteroids as a novel class of selective and complete androgen receptor antagonists and inhibitors of prostate cancer cell growth.
AID161974Efficacy as a function of maximal inhibition against human progesterone receptor B (hPR-B).1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-12, Volume: 41, Issue:4
Synthesis and biological activity of a novel series of nonsteroidal, peripherally selective androgen receptor antagonists derived from 1,2-dihydropyridono[5,6-g]quinolines.
AID1708706Antiproliferative activity against human 22Rv1 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 03-15, Volume: 36Synthesis, biological evaluation and X-ray analysis of bicalutamide sulfoxide analogues for the potential treatment of prostate cancer.
AID1313190Cytotoxicity against human HepG2 cells assessed as cell viability after 72 hrs by MTT assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-01, Volume: 26, Issue:15
Rational design and synthesis of novel anti-prostate cancer agents bearing a 3,5-bis-trifluoromethylphenyl moiety.
AID1079942Steatosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'STEAT' in source]
AID257791Cmax in rat ventral prostate at 3 mg/kg, po2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-26, Volume: 49, Issue:2
(+)-(2R,5S)-4-[4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-2,5-dimethyl-N-[6-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-3- yl]piperazine-1-carboxamide (YM580) as an orally potent and peripherally selective nonsteroidal androgen receptor antagonist.
AID39008Binding affinity for human androgen receptor transfected into mammalian COS-1 cells2000Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-06, Volume: 10, Issue:5
Effects of isosteric pyridone replacements in androgen receptor antagonists based on 1,2-dihydro- and 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-2,2-dimethyl-6-trifluoromethyl-8-pyridono[5,6-g]quin olines.
AID1635220Antiproliferative activity against human 22Rv1 cells after 96 hrs by propidium iodide staining based fluorescence 2D monolayer assay2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-08, Volume: 118Design and synthesis of novel bicalutamide and enzalutamide derivatives as antiproliferative agents for the treatment of prostate cancer.
AID588211Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in humans2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID578352Displacement of [3H]testosterone from Sprague-Dawley rat AR by liquid scintillation counting2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-15, Volume: 21, Issue:6
Design and synthesis of tricyclic tetrahydroquinolines as a new series of nonsteroidal selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs).
AID331663Antagonist activity at human androgen receptor in CV1 cells by transcriptional activation assay relative to dihydrotestosterone2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-01, Volume: 18, Issue:9
Selective androgen receptor modulators based on a series of 7H-[1,4]oxazino[3,2-g]quinolin-7-ones with improved in vivo activity.
AID38830In vitro antagonistic activity against human androgen receptor (hAR) expressed in CV-1 cells1999Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-05, Volume: 9, Issue:7
Nonsteroidal androgen receptor agonists based on 4-(trifluoromethyl)-2H-pyrano[3,2-g]quinolin-2-one.
AID630709Agonist activity at human AR overexpressed in human LNCAP cells assessed as fold increase at 1 uM by luciferase reporter gene assay relative to R18812011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-10, Volume: 54, Issue:21
Discovery of aryloxy tetramethylcyclobutanes as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID190320Effect of compound on testosterone hormone level on 14-day dosing in intact rats at 25 mg/kg.1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 31, Issue:5
Nonsteroidal antiandrogens. Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of 3-substituted derivatives of 2-hydroxypropionanilides.
AID316696Cmax in BALB/c mouse at 1.0 mmol/kg, po2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Identification and optimization of a novel series of [2.2.1]-oxabicyclo imide-based androgen receptor antagonists.
AID648207Anticancer activity against human LNCaP-hr cells assessed as prostate specific antigen level at 10 uM after 3 days by enzyme immunoassay relative to control2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Apr-01, Volume: 20, Issue:7
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 4-arylmethyl-1-phenylpyrazole and 4-aryloxy-1-phenylpyrazole derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID539147Membrane permeability by PAMPA assay2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 18, Issue:23
Design and synthesis of an androgen receptor pure antagonist (CH5137291) for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer.
AID1473942Ratio of drug concentration at steady state in human at 50 mg, po QD after 24 hrs to IC50 for human BSEP overexpressed in Sf9 insect cells2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID700378Antagonist activity at androgen receptor in human LNCaP cells assessed as reduction in DHT-induced PSA expression at 2.5 uM by luciferase reporter gene assay2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-26, Volume: 55, Issue:2
Antiandrogenic, maspin induction, and antiprostate cancer activities of tanshinone IIA and its novel derivatives with modification in ring A.
AID601825Agonist activity at androgen receptor W741L mutant expressed in african green monkey CV1 cells assessed as induction of transcriptional activity at 1 to 1000 nM by luciferase reporter gene assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-09, Volume: 54, Issue:11
Unexpected binding orientation of bulky-B-ring anti-androgens and implications for future drug targets.
AID257782Inhibition of human AR2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-26, Volume: 49, Issue:2
(+)-(2R,5S)-4-[4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-2,5-dimethyl-N-[6-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-3- yl]piperazine-1-carboxamide (YM580) as an orally potent and peripherally selective nonsteroidal androgen receptor antagonist.
AID178165Effective dose for antiandrogen activity in rats1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 31, Issue:5
Nonsteroidal antiandrogens. Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of 3-substituted derivatives of 2-hydroxypropionanilides.
AID1198071Antagonist activity against pSG5-tagged human androgen receptor expressed in COS1 cells assessed as reduction in receptor-mediated transcriptional activity by AR-regulated rat probasin promoter fragment driven firefly luciferase reporter assay2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-12, Volume: 58, Issue:3
Synthesis and biological evaluation of second-generation tropanol-based androgen receptor modulators.
AID253455Binding affinity for mutant T877A Androgen receptor in human LNCaP cells2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-17, Volume: 15, Issue:2
Structure based approach to the design of bicyclic-1H-isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione based androgen receptor antagonists.
AID1635251Antiproliferative activity against human DU145 cells assessed as relative inhibition after 96 hrs by propidium iodide staining based fluorescence 2D monolayer assay2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-08, Volume: 118Design and synthesis of novel bicalutamide and enzalutamide derivatives as antiproliferative agents for the treatment of prostate cancer.
AID39001Binding affinity against Androgen receptor transfected into COS cells1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-07, Volume: 8, Issue:7
New nonsteroidal androgen receptor modulators based on 4-(trifluoromethyl)-2(1H)-pyrrolidino[3,2-g] quinolinone.
AID503305Antiproliferative activity against human PC3 cells at 500 nM after 120 hrs by MTT assay relative to DMSO2006Nature chemical biology, Jun, Volume: 2, Issue:6
Identifying off-target effects and hidden phenotypes of drugs in human cells.
AID601820Displacement of [3H]MIB from GST-tagged wild type recombinant androgen receptor ligand binding domain after 18 hrs by scintillation counting relative to dihydrotestosterone2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-09, Volume: 54, Issue:11
Unexpected binding orientation of bulky-B-ring anti-androgens and implications for future drug targets.
AID700387Antagonist activity at androgen receptor ARv7 mutant lacking ligand binding domain expressed in human PC3 cells assessed as reduction in DHT-induced receptor transactivation at 1 uM by luciferase reporter gene assay2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-26, Volume: 55, Issue:2
Antiandrogenic, maspin induction, and antiprostate cancer activities of tanshinone IIA and its novel derivatives with modification in ring A.
AID257784Inhibition of rat PR2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-26, Volume: 49, Issue:2
(+)-(2R,5S)-4-[4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-2,5-dimethyl-N-[6-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-3- yl]piperazine-1-carboxamide (YM580) as an orally potent and peripherally selective nonsteroidal androgen receptor antagonist.
AID241409Inhibition of androgen receptor in human MDA-453 cells2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-17, Volume: 15, Issue:2
Structure based approach to the design of bicyclic-1H-isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione based androgen receptor antagonists.
AID655047Inhibition of R1881-induced androgen receptor nuclear translocation in human LNCAP cells at 10 uM pretreated for 3 hrs before R1881 challenge measured after 3 hrs by Hoechst staining-based immunocytometric analysis2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-01, Volume: 22, Issue:5
Methoxychalcone inhibitors of androgen receptor translocation and function.
AID1198073Antagonist activity against pSG5-tagged human androgen receptor expressed in COS1 cells assessed as receptor-mediated testosterone-induced transcriptional activity at 10 uM by AR-regulated rat probasin promoter fragment driven firefly luciferase reporter 2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-12, Volume: 58, Issue:3
Synthesis and biological evaluation of second-generation tropanol-based androgen receptor modulators.
AID625282Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cirrhosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID539141Agonist activity at human AR expressed in human HeLa cells co-transfected with MMTV-Luc-Hyg after 48 hrs by transient-luciferase reporter gene assay2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 18, Issue:23
Design and synthesis of an androgen receptor pure antagonist (CH5137291) for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer.
AID276469Stimulation of prostate weight in Sprague-Dawley rat relative to testosterone2006Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-15, Volume: 16, Issue:22
Synthesis and SAR of novel hydantoin derivatives as selective androgen receptor modulators.
AID257788AUC (0-72)hrs in rat plasma at 3 mg/kg, po2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-26, Volume: 49, Issue:2
(+)-(2R,5S)-4-[4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-2,5-dimethyl-N-[6-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-3- yl]piperazine-1-carboxamide (YM580) as an orally potent and peripherally selective nonsteroidal androgen receptor antagonist.
AID731983Antagonist activity at wild type Androgen receptor (unknown origin) expressed in human Cos-7 cells co-expressing pGL3-MMTV-luc vector assessed as luciferase activity by reporter gene assay2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 21, Issue:1
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 3-aryl-3-hydroxy-1-phenylpyrrolidine derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID1140402Antagonist activity at androgen receptor in human LNCAP cells assessed as inhibition of androgen-stimulated cell growth at 40 uM measured every 3 days relative to dihydrotestosterone2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 22, Issue:9
Preliminary investigations into triazole derived androgen receptor antagonists.
AID1079939Cirrhosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CIRRH' in source]
AID257796AUC (0-72)hrs in rat hypothalamus at 3 mg/kg, po2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-26, Volume: 49, Issue:2
(+)-(2R,5S)-4-[4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-2,5-dimethyl-N-[6-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-3- yl]piperazine-1-carboxamide (YM580) as an orally potent and peripherally selective nonsteroidal androgen receptor antagonist.
AID493500Displacement of [3H]DHT from AR in human MDA-MB-453 cells2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-01, Volume: 20, Issue:15
Design and synthesis of 4-[3,5-dioxo-11-oxa-4,9-diazatricyclo[5.3.1.0(2,6)]undec-4-yl]-2-trifluoromethyl-benzonitriles as androgen receptor antagonists.
AID738080Antiandrogenic activity in immature castrated Hershberger rat model assessed as inhibition of testosterone propionate-induced seminal vesicle growth at 2 mg/kg, po bid for 7 days2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 23, Issue:7
Discovery of AZD3514, a small-molecule androgen receptor downregulator for treatment of advanced prostate cancer.
AID539142Antagonist activity at human AR expressed in human HeLa cells co-transfected with MMTV-Luc-Hyg after 48 hrs by transient-luciferase reporter gene assay2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 18, Issue:23
Design and synthesis of an androgen receptor pure antagonist (CH5137291) for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer.
AID1079936Choleostatic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is < 2 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHOLE' in source]
AID1635250Antiproliferative activity against human LNCAP cells assessed as relative inhibition after 96 hrs by propidium iodide staining based fluorescence 2D monolayer assay2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-08, Volume: 118Design and synthesis of novel bicalutamide and enzalutamide derivatives as antiproliferative agents for the treatment of prostate cancer.
AID625284Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic failure2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID38800Agonistic activity against human androgen receptor (hAR) in co-transfected CV-1 cell1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-07, Volume: 8, Issue:7
New nonsteroidal androgen receptor modulators based on 4-(trifluoromethyl)-2(1H)-pyrrolidino[3,2-g] quinolinone.
AID1569746Antiproliferative activity against human LNCAP cells assessed as reduction in cell growth incubated for 96 hrs by propidium iodide based 2D monolayer assay2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-15, Volume: 180A new series of bicalutamide, enzalutamide and enobosarm derivatives carrying pentafluorosulfanyl (SF
AID316702Drug level in human CWR22R cells xenografted mouse plasma at 50 mg/kg, po after 1 hr on day 602008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Identification and optimization of a novel series of [2.2.1]-oxabicyclo imide-based androgen receptor antagonists.
AID276461Inhibition of prostate weight in Sprague-Dawley rat at 2 mg/day, po relative to control2006Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-15, Volume: 16, Issue:22
Synthesis and SAR of novel hydantoin derivatives as selective androgen receptor modulators.
AID305321Inhibition of prostate weight in testosterone treated castrated immature Sprague-Dawley rat at 2 mg/day2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 17, Issue:3
Synthesis and SAR of potent and selective androgen receptor antagonists: 5,6-Dichloro-benzimidazole derivatives.
AID700388Agonist activity at androgen receptor H874Y mutant expressed in human PC3 cells assessed as potentiation of 0.1 nM DHT-induced receptor transactivation at 0.1 to 1 uM by luciferase reporter gene assay2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-26, Volume: 55, Issue:2
Antiandrogenic, maspin induction, and antiprostate cancer activities of tanshinone IIA and its novel derivatives with modification in ring A.
AID257793Half life in rat ventral prostate at 3 mg/kg, po2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-26, Volume: 49, Issue:2
(+)-(2R,5S)-4-[4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-2,5-dimethyl-N-[6-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-3- yl]piperazine-1-carboxamide (YM580) as an orally potent and peripherally selective nonsteroidal androgen receptor antagonist.
AID316694Displacement of [3H]DHT from human androgen receptor in MDA453 cells2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Identification and optimization of a novel series of [2.2.1]-oxabicyclo imide-based androgen receptor antagonists.
AID639076Displacement of [17-alpha-methyl-3H]-mibolerone from human androgen receptor expressed in HEK293 derived FreeStyle293F cells after 3 hrs2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 20, Issue:1
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 4-phenylpyrrole derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID305324Inhibition of prostate weight in testosterone treated castrated mature Sprague-Dawley rat2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 17, Issue:3
Synthesis and SAR of potent and selective androgen receptor antagonists: 5,6-Dichloro-benzimidazole derivatives.
AID1751744Antagonist activity at human androgen receptor expressed in HEK-293 cells harboring GRE-LUC and CMV-renilla luciferase assessed as inhibition of transactivation incubated for 24 hrs in presence of R1881 by dual luciferase assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 08-12, Volume: 64, Issue:15
Exploration and Biological Evaluation of Basic Heteromonocyclic Propanamide Derivatives as SARDs for the Treatment of Enzalutamide-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
AID38822Antagonistic activity against human androgen receptor (hAR) in co-transfected CV-1 cell1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-07, Volume: 8, Issue:7
New nonsteroidal androgen receptor modulators based on 4-(trifluoromethyl)-2(1H)-pyrrolidino[3,2-g] quinolinone.
AID625289Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver disease2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID670357Cytotoxicity against androgen-independent human PC3 cells at 100 uM within 48 hrs by SRB assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jul-01, Volume: 20, Issue:13
Antitumor agents 290. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of new LNCaP and PC-3 cytotoxic curcumin analogs conjugated with anti-androgens.
AID316697Tmax in BALB/c mouse at 1.0 mmol/kg, po2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Identification and optimization of a novel series of [2.2.1]-oxabicyclo imide-based androgen receptor antagonists.
AID184813Effect of compound on LH level on 14-day dosing in intact rats; No statistically significant difference from control1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 31, Issue:5
Nonsteroidal antiandrogens. Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of 3-substituted derivatives of 2-hydroxypropionanilides.
AID1708707Antiproliferative activity against human DU-145 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 03-15, Volume: 36Synthesis, biological evaluation and X-ray analysis of bicalutamide sulfoxide analogues for the potential treatment of prostate cancer.
AID539148Antiandrogenic activity in castrated mouse assessed as reduction in wet weight gain of seminal vesicle2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 18, Issue:23
Design and synthesis of an androgen receptor pure antagonist (CH5137291) for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer.
AID38992Inhibitory concentration against human androgen receptor (AR) dependent transcriptional activity in co-transfected mammalian CV-1 cells2000Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-06, Volume: 10, Issue:5
Effects of isosteric pyridone replacements in androgen receptor antagonists based on 1,2-dihydro- and 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-2,2-dimethyl-6-trifluoromethyl-8-pyridono[5,6-g]quin olines.
AID39147Binding affinity for human androgen receptor in transiently-transfected COS-1 cells.1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-12, Volume: 41, Issue:4
Synthesis and biological activity of a novel series of nonsteroidal, peripherally selective androgen receptor antagonists derived from 1,2-dihydropyridono[5,6-g]quinolines.
AID276468Stimulation of levator ani muscle weight in Sprague-Dawley rat relative to testosterone2006Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-15, Volume: 16, Issue:22
Synthesis and SAR of novel hydantoin derivatives as selective androgen receptor modulators.
AID1569743Antagonist activity at GAL4-DBD fused rat androgen receptor expressed in UAS-bla 293 cells assessed as reduction in R1881-induced activation at 10 uM incubated for 16 hrs followed by fluorescence substrate addition and measured after 2 hrs by beta lactama2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-15, Volume: 180A new series of bicalutamide, enzalutamide and enobosarm derivatives carrying pentafluorosulfanyl (SF
AID670344Antiproliferative activity against androgen-independent human PC3 cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jul-01, Volume: 20, Issue:13
Antitumor agents 290. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of new LNCaP and PC-3 cytotoxic curcumin analogs conjugated with anti-androgens.
AID639252Antitumor activity against human LNCaP-FGC cells expressing androgen receptor W741C/T887A mutant xenografted in castrated BALB/c nude mouse assessed as effect on tumor volume at 20 mg/kg, po qd administered for 29 days measured on day 28 relative to contr2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 20, Issue:1
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 4-phenylpyrrole derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID293099Inhibition of testoterone-induced prostate weight in castrated immature Sprague-Dawley rat2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-15, Volume: 17, Issue:4
2-(2,2,2-Trifluoroethyl)-5,6-dichlorobenzimidazole derivatives as potent androgen receptor antagonists.
AID290230Antagonist activity at human androgen receptor expressed in CV1 cells assessed as inhibition of DHT-induced response2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-15, Volume: 17, Issue:6
Discovery of an androgen receptor modulator pharmacophore based on 2-quinolinones.
AID238961Inhibition of [3H]-DHT binding to T877A androgen receptor of LNCaP cells2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-17, Volume: 15, Issue:2
Identification of a novel class of androgen receptor antagonists based on the bicyclic-1H-isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione nucleus.
AID431977Activity in human PC3 cells expressing androgen receptor T877A mutant assessed as ARE-dependent transactivation at 1 uM after 24 hrs by luciferase reporter gene assay in absence of DHT2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-10, Volume: 52, Issue:17
Design and synthesis of androgen receptor antagonists with bulky side chains for overcoming antiandrogen resistance.
AID257798Oral clearance in rat hypothalamus at 3 mg/kg, po2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-26, Volume: 49, Issue:2
(+)-(2R,5S)-4-[4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-2,5-dimethyl-N-[6-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-3- yl]piperazine-1-carboxamide (YM580) as an orally potent and peripherally selective nonsteroidal androgen receptor antagonist.
AID248905Inhibition of L701H/T877A mutant androgen receptor of human prostate cancer MDAMB-PCa2b cell proliferation2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-17, Volume: 15, Issue:2
Identification of a novel class of androgen receptor antagonists based on the bicyclic-1H-isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione nucleus.
AID1198072Displacement of [3H]R1881 from pSG5-tagged human androgen receptor expressed in COS1 cells assessed as relative binding inhibition2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-12, Volume: 58, Issue:3
Synthesis and biological evaluation of second-generation tropanol-based androgen receptor modulators.
AID754108Displacement of [3H]R1881 from AR in human LNCaP cells after 2 hrs by scintillation counting analysis2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-27, Volume: 56, Issue:12
Systematic structure modifications of multitarget prostate cancer drug candidate galeterone to produce novel androgen receptor down-regulating agents as an approach to treatment of advanced prostate cancer.
AID1885078Antagonist activity at Androgen receptor (unknown origin) in African green monkey COS-1 cells2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-14, Volume: 65, Issue:13
Therapeutic Strategies to Target the Androgen Receptor.
AID190321Effect of compound on testosterone hormone level on 14-day dosing in intact rats; No statistically significant difference from controls1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 31, Issue:5
Nonsteroidal antiandrogens. Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of 3-substituted derivatives of 2-hydroxypropionanilides.
AID731985Inhibition of wild type Androgen receptor (unknown origin) expressed in Freestyle293F cells2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 21, Issue:1
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 3-aryl-3-hydroxy-1-phenylpyrrolidine derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID1474166Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring severity class index2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID626474Displacement of [3H]progesterone from progesterone receptor in JW rabbit uterus after 2 hrs by liquid scintillation counting2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 21, Issue:21
Tetrahydroquinolines as a novel series of nonsteroidal selective androgen receptor modulators: structural requirements for better physicochemical and biological properties.
AID648203Antagonist activity at androgen receptor T877A mutant expressed in Cos7 cells assessed as inhibition of dihydrotestosterone-induced luciferase activity after 24 hrs by reporter gene assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Apr-01, Volume: 20, Issue:7
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 4-arylmethyl-1-phenylpyrazole and 4-aryloxy-1-phenylpyrazole derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID257792AUC (0-72)hrs in rat ventral prostate at 3 mg/kg, po2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-26, Volume: 49, Issue:2
(+)-(2R,5S)-4-[4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-2,5-dimethyl-N-[6-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-3- yl]piperazine-1-carboxamide (YM580) as an orally potent and peripherally selective nonsteroidal androgen receptor antagonist.
AID1885121Antagonist activity at Androgen receptor in human LNCaP cells assessed as inhibition of Binding Function 3 (BF3) of AR measured by luciferase assay2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-14, Volume: 65, Issue:13
Therapeutic Strategies to Target the Androgen Receptor.
AID639168Antiandrogenic activity in ICR mouse assessed as reduction of ventral prostate weight at 100 mg/kg, po qd administered for 7 days relative to control2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 20, Issue:1
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 4-phenylpyrrole derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID293097Inhibition of testoterone-induced prostate weight in castrated immature Sprague-Dawley rat at 2 mg/day relative to control2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-15, Volume: 17, Issue:4
2-(2,2,2-Trifluoroethyl)-5,6-dichlorobenzimidazole derivatives as potent androgen receptor antagonists.
AID316695Antagonist activity at human androgen receptor in MDA453 cells by alkaline phosphatase reporter gene assay2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Identification and optimization of a novel series of [2.2.1]-oxabicyclo imide-based androgen receptor antagonists.
AID1636439Drug activation in human Hep3B cells assessed as human CYP2D6-mediated drug metabolism-induced cytotoxicity measured as decrease in cell viability at 31.6 uM pre-incubated with BSO for 18 hrs followed by incubation with compound for 3 hrs in presence of N2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 26, Issue:16
Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
AID242448Displacement of [3H]R-1881 from Androgen receptor of PC3-AR cells; - = not determined2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-21, Volume: 48, Issue:8
Novel C-17-heteroaryl steroidal CYP17 inhibitors/antiandrogens: synthesis, in vitro biological activity, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity in the LAPC4 human prostate cancer xenograft model.
AID539159Inhibition of prostate specific antigen production in human bicalutamide-resistant LNCAP cells xenografted SCID mouse at 100 mg/kg, po qd for seven cycles of 5 days on and 2 days off measured on day 172010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 18, Issue:23
Design and synthesis of an androgen receptor pure antagonist (CH5137291) for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer.
AID230356In vivo relative binding affinity (1h/18h) as ratio of binding affinities for R1881 and compound against rat ventral prostate androgen receptor using [3H]- R1881 as radioligand; 2/0.041992Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 35, Issue:10
Antiandrogenic steroidal sulfonyl heterocycles. Utility of electrostatic complementarity in defining bioisosteric sulfonyl heterocycles.
AID257779Inhibition of AR mediated transcriptional activation using reporter assay2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-26, Volume: 49, Issue:2
(+)-(2R,5S)-4-[4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-2,5-dimethyl-N-[6-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-3- yl]piperazine-1-carboxamide (YM580) as an orally potent and peripherally selective nonsteroidal androgen receptor antagonist.
AID1079937Severe hepatitis, defined as possibly life-threatening liver failure or through clinical observations. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'MASS' in source]
AID248385In vitro antagonistic activity against mutant androgen receptor of LNCap cells2004Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-20, Volume: 14, Issue:24
The synthesis and evaluation of [2.2.1]-bicycloazahydantoins as androgen receptor antagonists.
AID1473740Inhibition of human MRP3 overexpressed in Sf9 insect cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 10 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID257785Inhibition of human GR2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-26, Volume: 49, Issue:2
(+)-(2R,5S)-4-[4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-2,5-dimethyl-N-[6-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-3- yl]piperazine-1-carboxamide (YM580) as an orally potent and peripherally selective nonsteroidal androgen receptor antagonist.
AID648202Antagonist activity at androgen receptor expressed in Cos7 cells assessed as inhibition of dihydrotestosterone-induced luciferase activity after 24 hrs by reporter gene assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Apr-01, Volume: 20, Issue:7
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 4-arylmethyl-1-phenylpyrazole and 4-aryloxy-1-phenylpyrazole derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID626477Displacement of [3H]Aldo from mineralocorticoid receptor in Sprague-Dawley rat kidney after 2 hrs by liquid scintillation counting2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 21, Issue:21
Tetrahydroquinolines as a novel series of nonsteroidal selective androgen receptor modulators: structural requirements for better physicochemical and biological properties.
AID1872310Binding affinity to Androgen receptor (unknown origin) assessed as inhibition constant2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 230Overview of the development of selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) as pharmacological treatment for osteoporosis (1998-2021).
AID670352Inhibition of actin based pseudopodia formation in androgen-dependent human PC3 cells at 100 uM after 48 hrs by DAPI staining based fluorescence microscopy assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jul-01, Volume: 20, Issue:13
Antitumor agents 290. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of new LNCaP and PC-3 cytotoxic curcumin analogs conjugated with anti-androgens.
AID731981Agonist activity at wild type Androgen receptor in human LNCaP-hr cells assessed as prostate specific antigen secretion measured after 3 days by enzyme-immunoassay2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 21, Issue:1
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 3-aryl-3-hydroxy-1-phenylpyrrolidine derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID1769346Displacement of FluormoneAL Green from recombinant rat androgen receptor at 10 uM incubated for 4 hrs by fluorescent polarization assay relative to control2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-28, Volume: 64, Issue:20
Development of 2-(5,6,7-Trifluoro-1
AID192021Agonist activity indicated by a statistically significant increase in ventral prostate gland weight compared, to control animals; NA means no statistically significant increase in ventral prostate weight compared to controls.1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 31, Issue:5
Nonsteroidal antiandrogens. Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of 3-substituted derivatives of 2-hydroxypropionanilides.
AID1430114Selectivity index, ratio of IC50 for mouse 3T3 cells to IC50 for AR T877A mutant in human LNCAP cells2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 03-01, Volume: 27, Issue:5
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of 2-(4-phenylthiazol-2-yl) isoindoline-1,3-dione derivatives as anti-prostate cancer agents.
AID625286Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID305323Inhibition of prostate weight in testosterone treated castrated immature Sprague-Dawley rat2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 17, Issue:3
Synthesis and SAR of potent and selective androgen receptor antagonists: 5,6-Dichloro-benzimidazole derivatives.
AID601824Antagonist activity at androgen receptor T877A mutant expressed in african green monkey CV1 cells assessed as inhibition of dihydrotestosterone-induced transcriptional activity at 1 to 1000 nM by luciferase reporter gene assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-09, Volume: 54, Issue:11
Unexpected binding orientation of bulky-B-ring anti-androgens and implications for future drug targets.
AID648290Cytotoxicity against human androgen-dependent LNCAP cells by MTT assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-01, Volume: 22, Issue:5
1,2,4-Oxadiazoles: a new class of anti-prostate cancer agents.
AID1079949Proposed mechanism(s) of liver damage. [column 'MEC' in source]
AID1199395Displacement of [3H]R1881 from androgen receptor in human LNCAP cells2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-12, Volume: 58, Issue:5
Discovery and development of Galeterone (TOK-001 or VN/124-1) for the treatment of all stages of prostate cancer.
AID639153Antagonist activity at human androgen receptor W741C mutant expressed in COS7 cells assessed as inhibition of DHT-induced luciferase activity after 24 hrs by reporter gene assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 20, Issue:1
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 4-phenylpyrrole derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID625288Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for jaundice2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID759311Cytotoxicity against ERalpha-deficient human DU145 cells expressing ERbeta assessed as growth inhibition after 72 hrs by MTT assay2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-25, Volume: 56, Issue:14
Histone deacetylase inhibitors equipped with estrogen receptor modulation activity.
AID248278In vitro antagonistic activity against androgen receptor of MDA-453 cells2004Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-20, Volume: 14, Issue:24
The synthesis and evaluation of [2.2.1]-bicycloazahydantoins as androgen receptor antagonists.
AID1269934Cytotoxicity against human LNCAP cells assessed as reduction in cell viability after 4 days by MTT assay in presence of DHT and E22016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 24, Issue:4
Design and synthesis of novel androgen receptor antagonists via molecular modeling.
AID1249999Plasma concentration in immature Sprague-Dawley rat prostate weight model at 10 mg/kg, po qd administered for 4 days measured 2 hrs post last dose on day 42015ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-13, Volume: 6, Issue:8
Discovery of BMS-641988, a Novel Androgen Receptor Antagonist for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer.
AID625276FDA Liver Toxicity Knowledge Base Benchmark Dataset (LTKB-BD) drugs of most concern for DILI2011Drug discovery today, Aug, Volume: 16, Issue:15-16
FDA-approved drug labeling for the study of drug-induced liver injury.
AID639248Antitumor activity against human JDCaP cells expressing wild type AR xenografted in testosterone propionate-challenged castrated BALB/c nude mouse assessed as decrease in tumor volume at 20 mg/kg, po qd administered for 29 days measured on day 28 relative2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 20, Issue:1
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 4-phenylpyrrole derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID1079934Highest frequency of acute liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% AIGUE' in source]
AID648201Displacement of [17-alpha-methyl-3H]mibolerone from androgen receptor T877A mutant expressed in HEK293 cells after 3 hrs2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Apr-01, Volume: 20, Issue:7
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 4-arylmethyl-1-phenylpyrazole and 4-aryloxy-1-phenylpyrazole derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID294972Reduction of prostate weight in orally dosed mature rat2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-01, Volume: 17, Issue:9
beta-Alkylthio indolyl carbinols: potent nonsteroidal antiandrogens with oral efficacy in a prostate cancer model.
AID630714Antitumor activity against human LNCAP cells xenografted in athymic nude Harlan Sprague-Dawley mouse assessed as serum prostate specific antigen suppression at 10 mg/kg, po administered once daily for 5 weeks measured after 5 weeks by ELISA relative to ve2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-10, Volume: 54, Issue:21
Discovery of aryloxy tetramethylcyclobutanes as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID1198075Agonist activity at pSG5-tagged human androgen receptor W741L mutant expressed in COS1 cells assessed as receptor-mediated transcriptional activity by AR-regulated rat probasin promoter fragment driven firefly luciferase reporter assay relative to control2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-12, Volume: 58, Issue:3
Synthesis and biological evaluation of second-generation tropanol-based androgen receptor modulators.
AID292744Inhibition of testosterone-induced prostate weight increase in Sprague-Dawley rat by modified Hersherberger assay2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-01, Volume: 17, Issue:1
The discovery of a potent orally efficacious indole androgen receptor antagonist through in vivo screening.
AID539146Metabolic stability in human liver microsomes assessed as compound remaining after 15 mins by LC-MS/MS analysis2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 18, Issue:23
Design and synthesis of an androgen receptor pure antagonist (CH5137291) for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer.
AID178941Effective dose required to inhibit 50 percent of androgen hormone activity in intact rat1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 31, Issue:5
Nonsteroidal antiandrogens. Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of 3-substituted derivatives of 2-hydroxypropionanilides.
AID539144Agonist activity at AR in human bicalutamide-resistant LNCAP cells assessed as effect on cell proliferation after 6 days2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 18, Issue:23
Design and synthesis of an androgen receptor pure antagonist (CH5137291) for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer.
AID625281Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholelithiasis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID39294In vivo binding affinity for rat ventral prostate androgen receptor by displacement of [3H]R-18811992Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-15, Volume: 35, Issue:10
Antiandrogenic steroidal sulfonyl heterocycles. Utility of electrostatic complementarity in defining bioisosteric sulfonyl heterocycles.
AID1168321Growth inhibition of human LNCAP cells2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 24, Issue:21
Synthesis and preliminary investigations into novel 1,2,3-triazole-derived androgen receptor antagonists inspired by bicalutamide.
AID670342Cytotoxicity against androgen-independent human PC3 cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jul-01, Volume: 20, Issue:13
Antitumor agents 290. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of new LNCaP and PC-3 cytotoxic curcumin analogs conjugated with anti-androgens.
AID1249997In vivo antagonist activity at androgen receptor in immature Sprague-Dawley rat prostate weight model assessed as testosterone propionate-induced weight of seminal vesicles over full body weight at 10 mg/kg, po qd administered for 4 days2015ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-13, Volume: 6, Issue:8
Discovery of BMS-641988, a Novel Androgen Receptor Antagonist for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer.
AID578354Displacement of [3H]17-beta-estradiol from rabbit ER by liquid scintillation counting2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-15, Volume: 21, Issue:6
Design and synthesis of tricyclic tetrahydroquinolines as a new series of nonsteroidal selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs).
AID1233504Antiproliferative activity against human LNCAP cells after 3 days2015European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-24, Volume: 99Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel 5-oxo-2-thioxoimidazolidine derivatives as potent androgen receptor antagonists.
AID257786Inhibition of human ERalpha2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-26, Volume: 49, Issue:2
(+)-(2R,5S)-4-[4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-2,5-dimethyl-N-[6-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-3- yl]piperazine-1-carboxamide (YM580) as an orally potent and peripherally selective nonsteroidal androgen receptor antagonist.
AID527639Antiandrogen activity against androgen receptor in androgen-dependent mouse SC3 cells assessed as inhibition of testosterone-induced cell proliferation by WST1 assay2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-15, Volume: 20, Issue:22
Novel selective anti-androgens with a diphenylpentane skeleton.
AID1079943Malignant tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.MAL' in source]
AID280723Displacement of [3H]R1881 from rat AR relative to R18812007Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-08, Volume: 50, Issue:5
Synthesis and biological evaluation of [18F]bicalutamide, 4-[76Br]bromobicalutamide, and 4-[76Br]bromo-thiobicalutamide as non-steroidal androgens for prostate cancer imaging.
AID1430113Selectivity ratio of IC50 for AR negative human PC3 cells to IC50 for AR T877A mutant in human LNCAP cells2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 03-01, Volume: 27, Issue:5
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of 2-(4-phenylthiazol-2-yl) isoindoline-1,3-dione derivatives as anti-prostate cancer agents.
AID630801Antagonist activity at human AR overexpressed in human LNCAP cells at 1 uM by luciferase reporter gene assay in the presence of agonist R18812011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-10, Volume: 54, Issue:21
Discovery of aryloxy tetramethylcyclobutanes as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID630715Toxicity in athymic nude Harlan Sprague-Dawley mouse xenografted with human LNCAP cells assessed as effect on body weight at 10 mg/kg, po administered once daily for 5 weeks2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-10, Volume: 54, Issue:21
Discovery of aryloxy tetramethylcyclobutanes as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID1079944Benign tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.BEN' in source]
AID1443986Inhibition of recombinant human BSEP expressed in baculovirus infected sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as reduction in ATP or AMP-dependent [3H]-taurocholic acid uptake in to vesicles preincubated for 5 mins followed by ATP/AMP addition measured after2014Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), Sep, Volume: 60, Issue:3
Human drug-induced liver injury severity is highly associated with dual inhibition of liver mitochondrial function and bile salt export pump.
AID648288Cytotoxicity against human androgen-independent DU145 cells by MTT assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-01, Volume: 22, Issue:5
1,2,4-Oxadiazoles: a new class of anti-prostate cancer agents.
AID1249995Antagonist activity at androgen receptor in human MDA-MB-453 cells assessed as inhibition of DHT-induced PSA expression by alkaline phosphatase reporter gene assay2015ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-13, Volume: 6, Issue:8
Discovery of BMS-641988, a Novel Androgen Receptor Antagonist for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer.
AID248616Inhibition of T877A androgen receptor of human prostate cancer cells in reporter gene assay2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-17, Volume: 15, Issue:2
Identification of a novel class of androgen receptor antagonists based on the bicyclic-1H-isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione nucleus.
AID648210Anticancer activity against human LNCaP-hr cells xenografted in BALB/c athymic nude mouse assessed as change in tumor volume at 100 mg/kg, po qd after 28 days relative to control2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Apr-01, Volume: 20, Issue:7
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 4-arylmethyl-1-phenylpyrazole and 4-aryloxy-1-phenylpyrazole derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID639164Antiandrogenic activity in ICR mouse assessed as ventral prostate weight at 100 mg/kg, po qd administered for 7 days (Rvb = 14.6 +/- 1.6g)2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 20, Issue:1
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 4-phenylpyrrole derivatives as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
AID1443992Total Cmax in human administered as single dose2014Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), Sep, Volume: 60, Issue:3
Human drug-induced liver injury severity is highly associated with dual inhibition of liver mitochondrial function and bile salt export pump.
AID239156Displacement of [3H]DHT from androgen receptor of human MDA-453 cells2004Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-20, Volume: 14, Issue:24
The synthesis and evaluation of [2.2.1]-bicycloazahydantoins as androgen receptor antagonists.
AID242058Displacement of [3H]R-1881 from Androgen receptor of LNCaP cells2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-21, Volume: 48, Issue:8
Novel C-17-heteroaryl steroidal CYP17 inhibitors/antiandrogens: synthesis, in vitro biological activity, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity in the LAPC4 human prostate cancer xenograft model.
AID478368Activity at human AR expressed in human HeLa cells after 48 hrs by stable-luciferase reporter gene assay2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 18, Issue:9
Structure-activity relationships of bioisosteric replacement of the carboxylic acid in novel androgen receptor pure antagonists.
AID1347105qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347106qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347104qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1347089qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347099qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347103qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347101qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347092qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for A673 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347090qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1347096qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347094qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1347154Primary screen GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347107qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347095qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347091qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347102qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347097qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347108qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1347100qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347098qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347093qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347159Primary screen GU Rhodamine qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors: Unlinked NS2B-NS3 protease assay2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347160Primary screen NINDS Rhodamine qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347411qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Mechanism Interrogation Plate v5.0 (MIPE) Libary2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1797738AR Transcriptional Activation Assay and MDA Whole-Cell Binding Assay from Article 10.1021/jm070231h: \\Substituted 6-(1-Pyrrolidine)quinolin-2(1H)-ones as Novel Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators.\\2007Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-18, Volume: 50, Issue:21
Substituted 6-(1-pyrrolidine)quinolin-2(1H)-ones as novel selective androgen receptor modulators.
AID1797740AR Transcriptional Activation Assay and MDA Whole-Cell Binding Assay from Article 10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.01.007: \\Discovery of an androgen receptor modulator pharmacophore based on 2-quinolinones.\\2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-15, Volume: 17, Issue:6
Discovery of an androgen receptor modulator pharmacophore based on 2-quinolinones.
AID1797749Luciferase Reporter Assay from Article 10.1021/jm050293c: \\(+)-(2R,5S)-4-[4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-2,5-dimethyl-N-[6-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-3- yl]piperazine-1-carboxamide (YM580) as an orally potent and peripherally selective nonsteroidal andr2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-26, Volume: 49, Issue:2
(+)-(2R,5S)-4-[4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-2,5-dimethyl-N-[6-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-3- yl]piperazine-1-carboxamide (YM580) as an orally potent and peripherally selective nonsteroidal androgen receptor antagonist.
AID1800104HDAC Activity Assay from Article 10.1021/cb400542w: \\Selectively targeting prostate cancer with antiandrogen equipped histone deacetylase inhibitors.\\2013ACS chemical biology, Nov-15, Volume: 8, Issue:11
Selectively targeting prostate cancer with antiandrogen equipped histone deacetylase inhibitors.
AID1799354SPA Binding Assay (IC50) from Article 10.1021/cb900143a: \\Novel flufenamic acid analogues as inhibitors of androgen receptor mediated transcription.\\2009ACS chemical biology, Oct-16, Volume: 4, Issue:10
Novel flufenamic acid analogues as inhibitors of androgen receptor mediated transcription.
AID1347405qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS LOPAC collection2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1347057CD47-SIRPalpha protein protein interaction - LANCE assay qHTS validation2019PloS one, , Volume: 14, Issue:7
Quantitative high-throughput screening assays for the discovery and development of SIRPα-CD47 interaction inhibitors.
AID1347151Optimization of GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors: Unlinked NS2B-NS3 protease assay2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347410qHTS for inhibitors of adenylyl cyclases using a fission yeast platform: a pilot screen against the NCATS LOPAC library2019Cellular signalling, 08, Volume: 60A fission yeast platform for heterologous expression of mammalian adenylyl cyclases and high throughput screening.
AID1347059CD47-SIRPalpha protein protein interaction - Alpha assay qHTS validation2019PloS one, , Volume: 14, Issue:7
Quantitative high-throughput screening assays for the discovery and development of SIRPα-CD47 interaction inhibitors.
AID1347058CD47-SIRPalpha protein protein interaction - HTRF assay qHTS validation2019PloS one, , Volume: 14, Issue:7
Quantitative high-throughput screening assays for the discovery and development of SIRPα-CD47 interaction inhibitors.
AID1346888Human Androgen receptor (3C. 3-Ketosteroid receptors)2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-08, Volume: 53, Issue:7
Structure-activity relationship for thiohydantoin androgen receptor antagonists for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).
AID1346888Human Androgen receptor (3C. 3-Ketosteroid receptors)2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-26, Volume: 49, Issue:2
(+)-(2R,5S)-4-[4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-2,5-dimethyl-N-[6-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-3- yl]piperazine-1-carboxamide (YM580) as an orally potent and peripherally selective nonsteroidal androgen receptor antagonist.
AID1794808Fluorescence-based screening to identify small molecule inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum apicoplast DNA polymerase (Pf-apPOL).2014Journal of biomolecular screening, Jul, Volume: 19, Issue:6
A High-Throughput Assay to Identify Inhibitors of the Apicoplast DNA Polymerase from Plasmodium falciparum.
AID1794808Fluorescence-based screening to identify small molecule inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum apicoplast DNA polymerase (Pf-apPOL).
AID1159607Screen for inhibitors of RMI FANCM (MM2) intereaction2016Journal of biomolecular screening, Jul, Volume: 21, Issue:6
A High-Throughput Screening Strategy to Identify Protein-Protein Interaction Inhibitors That Block the Fanconi Anemia DNA Repair Pathway.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (1,266)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-199011 (0.87)18.7374
1990's162 (12.80)18.2507
2000's489 (38.63)29.6817
2010's490 (38.70)24.3611
2020's114 (9.00)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 96.47

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index96.47 (24.57)
Research Supply Index7.33 (2.92)
Research Growth Index5.91 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index174.79 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (96.47)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials212 (16.15%)5.53%
Reviews114 (8.68%)6.00%
Case Studies125 (9.52%)4.05%
Observational6 (0.46%)0.25%
Other856 (65.19%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (182)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
The Registry to Observe Clinical Outcomes of Patients With High-risk Metastatic Hormone-naïve Prostate Cancer in Japan [NCT04034095]979 participants (Actual)Observational [Patient Registry]2019-07-08Active, not recruiting
ATLAS: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase 3 Study of JNJ-56021927 in Subjects With High-risk, Localized or Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Receiving Treatment With Primary Radiation Therapy [NCT02531516]Phase 31,503 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase I/II, Single Arm, Non-randomized Study of Ribociclib (LEE011), a CDK 4/6 Inhibitor, in Combination With Bicalutamide, an Androgen Receptor (AR) Inhibitor, in Advanced AR+ Triple-negative Breast Cancer: Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium BRE15-024 [NCT03090165]Phase 1/Phase 237 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-05-07Recruiting
A Phase III Trial to Evaluate the Duration of Neoadjuvant Total Androgen Suppression (TAS) and Radiation Therapy (RT) in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer [NCT00005044]Phase 31,579 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-02-29Completed
A Phase III Randomized Prospective Trial of Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy in Surgically Treated Prostate Cancer Patients at High Risk for Recurrence [NCT00003645]Phase 364 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-06-14Terminated(stopped due to Per PI request)
A Canadian Phase II, Placebo-controlled Randomized Trial of Bicalutamide in Patients Receiving Maintenance Avelumab for Metastatic Urothelial Cancer. [NCT06018116]Phase 269 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-31Not yet recruiting
A PHASE III TRIAL OF RADIATION THERAPY WITH OR WITHOUT CASODEX IN PATIENTS WITH PSA ELEVATION FOLLOWING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR pT3N0 CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE [NCT00002874]Phase 3840 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-02-28Completed
[NCT02382094]Phase 3110 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
Neoadjuvant Treatment of Prostate Cancer With Bicalutamide and Raloxifene Prior to Radical Prostatectomy [NCT03147196]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-27Withdrawn(stopped due to lack of accrual)
Phase II Study Evaluating HSV-tk + Valacyclovir Gene Therapy in Combination With Androgen Deprivation Therapy, Brachytherapy, External Beam Radiotherapy, and Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer [NCT03541928]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-08-02Recruiting
An Open-label, Non-comparative, Multi-centre Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Bicalutamide When Used in Combination With Anastrozole for the Treatment of Gonadotropin-independent Precocious Puberty in Boys With Testotoxicosis [NCT00094328]Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-22Completed
A Phase 3 Study of Androgen Annihilation in High-Risk Biochemically Relapsed Prostate Cancer [NCT03009981]Phase 3504 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-03-06Active, not recruiting
A Phase I/II Study of High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy as Monotherapy for Prostate Cancer [NCT02346253]163 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-01-13Active, not recruiting
Bicalutamide in Treating Patients With AR-positive Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer [NCT02353988]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-01-31Not yet recruiting
A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Open Study of SHR3680 Compared to Bicalutamide in the Treatment of Patients With Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer [NCT03520478]Phase 3654 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-05-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of PROSTVAC-V (Vaccinia)/TRICOM and PROSTVAC-F (Fowlpox)/TRICOM With GM-CSF in Patients With PSA Progression After Local Therapy for Prostate Cancer [NCT00108732]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
Bicalutamide Implants (Biolen) With Radiation Therapy in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer [NCT04943536]Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-01Recruiting
A Randomized, Multicenter,Phase III Study of Bicalutamide Versus Chemotherapy in First Line Treatment of AR Positive Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer [NCT03055312]Phase 336 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-20Terminated
Serial Measurements of Molecular and Architectural Responses to Therapy (SMMART) Trial: PRIME [NCT03878524]Phase 12 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-04-01Active, not recruiting
Phase III Trial of Dose Escalated Radiation Therapy and Standard Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) With a GNRH Agonist vs. Dose Escalated Radiation Therapy and Enhanced ADT With a GNRH Agonist and TAK-700 For Men With High Risk Prostate Cancer [NCT01546987]Phase 3239 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Active, not recruiting
Adjuvant Androgen Deprivation Versus Mitoxantrone Plus Prednisone Plus Androgen Deprivation in Selected High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Following Radical Prostatectomy [NCT00004124]Phase 3983 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-10-15Completed
Radiation Therapy and Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Treating Patients Who Have Undergone Surgery for Prostate Cancer (RADICALS) [NCT00541047]Phase 34,236 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Phase II Evaluation of Early Oral Estramustine, Oral Etoposide and Intravenous Paclitaxel in Combination With Hormone Therapy in Patients With High-Risk Metastatic Adenocarinoma of the Prostate [NCT00028769]Phase 241 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-12-31Completed
Intermittent Androgen Deprivation in Patients With Stage D2 Prostate Cancer, Phase III [NCT00002651]Phase 33,040 participants (Actual)Interventional1995-05-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase II, Efficacy and Safety Study of MDV3100 Versus Bicalutamide in Castrate Men With Metastatic Prostate Cancer [NCT01288911]Phase 2375 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-22Completed
Temsirolimus, an mTOR Inhibitor, to Reverse Androgen Insensitivity in Patients With Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT01020305]Phase 1/Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Decision by funding sponsor due to poor accrual)
A Phase III Study of Neoadjuvant Docetaxel and Androgen Suppression Plus Radiation Therapy Versus Androgen Suppression Alone Plus Radiation Therapy for High-Risk Localized Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate [NCT00651326]Phase 348 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-02Terminated(stopped due to Poor accrual)
A Phase 2 Study of Bicalutamide Plus Finasteride in Men With MRI Detectable Prostate Nodules Undergoing Active Surveillance [NCT02146937]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Due to lack of accrual for this study. PI decided to close the study.)
Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant IMC-A12 Combined With Androgen Deprivation Prior to Prostatectomy [NCT00769795]Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Randomized Trial of Bicalutamide to Block TMPRSS2 in Males With COVID-19 Infection [NCT04509999]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-26Withdrawn(stopped due to No patients enrolled and funding withdrawn)
A Phase II Study of Nivolumab Combined With Bicalutamide and Ipilimumab in Metastatic HER2-negative Breast Cancer [NCT03650894]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-03Active, not recruiting
A Phase III Randomized Trial Comparing Androgen Deprivation Therapy + TAK-700 With Androgen Deprivation Therapy + Bicalutamide in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Sensitive Prostate Cancer [NCT01809691]Phase 31,313 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-08Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Study of Finite Androgen Ablation vs. Finite Androgen Ablation in Combination With Abiraterone Acetate and Prednisone in Patients With Prostate Cancer Who Have PSA Progression After Prostatectomy and/or Radiotherapy [NCT01786265]Phase 2310 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-02-05Active, not recruiting
A Study to Establish the Feasibility of Biolen for the Local Delivery of Bicalutamide in Patients With Prostate Cancer [NCT04284761]Phase 117 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-11Completed
A Phase I Trial to Evaluate Acute and Late Toxicities of Concurrent Treatment With Everolimus (RAD001) and Radio-Hormonotherapy in High-risk Prostate Cancer.(RHOMUS) [NCT00943956]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
A Randomized, Open Label, Multicenter, Phase III, 2-Arm Study of Androgen Deprivation With Leuprolide, +/- Docetaxel for Clinically Asymptomatic Prostate Cancer Subjects With a Rising PSA Following Definitive Local Therapy [NCT00514917]Phase 3413 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Company decision to discontinue the study, not due to any safety or efficacy concerns)
Pilot Trial of Bicalutamide Versus Placebo in Reproductive-Aged Women With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) [NCT05979389]Phase 150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-31Not yet recruiting
Autonomic and Renal Contributions to Hypertension With Androgen Deprivation Therapy [NCT05700903]Phase 4228 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-20Recruiting
Randomized, 1-Way Parallel, Bioequivalence Study of Bicalutamide 50 mg Tablets and Casodex® Administered as 1 x 50 mg Tablet in Healthy Subjects Under Fasting Conditions [NCT00973050]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-09-30Completed
Diagnosing and Monitoring Recurrent Disease in Prostate Cancer Patients Using a Positron Emission Tomography Radiotracer (Axumin™) [NCT03996993]20 participants (Anticipated)Observational2019-07-01Recruiting
Imperial Prostate 4: Comparative Health Research Outcomes of NOvel Surgery in Prostate Cancer [NCT04049747]2,450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-12-11Recruiting
A Randomized Phase II Trial on the Addition of Dutasteride to Combined Androgen Blockade Therapy Versus Combined Androgen Blockade Therapy Alone in Patients With Recurrent and/or Metastatic Salivary Duct Carcinoma - DUCT Study [NCT05513365]Phase 298 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-27Recruiting
Phase II-III Trial of Adjuvant Radiotherapy Following Radical Prostatectomy With or Without Adjuvant Docetaxel [NCT03070886]Phase 2/Phase 3175 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-16Active, not recruiting
Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel-group, Multicentre Phase II Study to Assess Dose Response Relationship of Nolvadex (Oral Tablet) in Prophylactic Treatment of Gynaecomastia and Breast Pain Associated With CASODEX 150 mg (Oral Tablet) [NCT00637871]Phase 20 participants Interventional2002-11-30Completed
Phase II Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing 3-D Conformal Radiation Therapy (RT) vs. Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Post- Prostatectomy Prostate Cancer Patients [NCT02678520]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Withdrawn(stopped due to PI no longer at institution. Study terminated prior to enrolling subjects.)
FDHT-PET to Visualize the Effect on the Androgen Receptor Level by Bicalutamide [NCT02697032]Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-29Completed
Randomized, Open-Label, 1-Way Parallel, Bioequivalence Study of Bicalutamide 50 mg Tablet and Casodex (Reference) Following a 50 mg Dose in Healthy Subjects Under Fasting Conditions. [NCT00959335]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
A Prospective Multi-center Study to Compare the QOL and Efficacy of Endocrine Therapy With or Without Cryoablation for Stage IV Prostate Cancer. [NCT02615223]120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-11-30Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Trial Comparing Casodex 150mg Once Daily With Placebo in Patients With Non-Metastatic Prostate Cancer. [NCT00672282]Phase 31,218 participants (Actual)Interventional1995-10-31Completed
Adjuvant 3DCRT/IMRT in Combination With Androgen Suppression and Docetaxel for High Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Post-Prostatectomy: A Phase II Trial [NCT00528866]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
Randomized, Bioequivalence Study of Bicalutamide 50 mg Tablet and Casodex 50 mg Tablet Following a 50 mg Dose in Healthy Subjects Under Fasting Conditions [NCT01039233]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
A Randomised, Parallel-arm, Open-label Trial Comparing Degarelix With Goserelin Plus Anti-androgen Flare Protection (Bicalutamide), in Terms of Reduction in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), in Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) [NCT00831233]Phase 342 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Poor recruitment due to rare targeted population)
A Randomised, Parallel-arm, Open-label Trial Comparing Degarelix With Goserelin Plus Anti-androgen Flare Protection (Bicalutamide), in Terms of Volume Reduction of the Prostate in Patients With Prostate Cancer Being Candidates for Medical Castration [NCT00884273]Phase 3182 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Trial Comparing Bicalutamide (Casodex) 150mg Once Daily With Placebo in Patients With Non-metastatic Prostate Cancer [NCT00673205]Phase 33,588 participants (Actual)Interventional1995-09-30Completed
Neoadjuvant Androgen Depletion in Combination With Vorinostat Followed by Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Total Androgen-Receptor Gene Expression Targeted Therapy (TARGET) [NCT00589472]Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
A Prospective Multi-center Study to Compare the QOL and Efficacy of External Beam Radiation Therapy or Cryoablation Therapy for Stage III Prostate Cancer [NCT02605226]240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-11-30Recruiting
Phase II Interstitial Brachytherapy Combined With Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Locally Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Prior External Beam Irradiation [NCT00684905]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2000-04-30Completed
Rapid Hormonal Cycling as Treatment for Patients With Prostate Cancer: The Men's Cycle [NCT00586898]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-07-31Completed
A Compassionate Use Trial With Bicalutamide (Casodex) 150-mg for Subjects With Prostate Cancer [NCT00636259]0 participants Expanded AccessNo longer available
Androgen Deprivation and Localized Radiotherapy to Metastases in Patients With Oligometastatic Hormone - Sensitive Prostate Cancer [NCT00544830]Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-18Active, not recruiting
Utility of Exosomal microRNAs to Predict Response to Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Prostate Cancer Patients [NCT02366494]60 participants (Anticipated)Observational2015-04-29Active, not recruiting
Phase I Study Evaluating Extended Field Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and Docetaxel in Patients With Prostate Cancer Associated With Pelvic Node Metastasis [NCT00482807]Phase 19 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-08-31Completed
Phase II, Randomized Study of Patients With Rising PSA at High-Risk of Progression After Primary Therapy to Assess the Clinical and Molecular Efficacy of the Enzastaurin - Bicalutamide Combination to Suppress the Androgen Receptor Without Testosterone Abl [NCT00685633]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Withdrawn
Phase III Study of the Comparison of Abarelix Versus Goserelin Plus Bicalutamide in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Prostate Cancer. A One Year Randomised, Open Label, Multi-Centre Phase III Trial. [NCT00841113]Phase 3177 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-01-31Completed
Sunitinib, Hormonal Ablation and External Beam Radiation Therapy for High-Risk and Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer [NCT00631527]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
A Phase II Randomised Efficacy and Safety Study of Vandetanib (ZD 6474) in Combination With Bicalutamide Versus Bicalutamide Alone in Patients With Chemotherapy Naive Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer. [NCT00757692]Phase 274 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
INTREPId (INTermediate Risk Erection PreservatIon Trial): A Randomized Trial of Radiation Therapy and Darolutamide for Prostate Cancer [NCT04025372]Phase 2220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-01Recruiting
Randomized, Open-Label, 1-Way Parallel, Bioequivalence Study of Bicalutamide 50 mg Tablet and Casodex (Reference) Following a 50 mg Dose in Healthy Subjects Under Fed Conditions. [NCT00960310]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
Bioequivalence Study of ICI176,334-1 in Japanese Healthy Male Subjects - Evaluation of Bioequivalence of ICI176,334-1 and Casodex 80 mg Tablet - [NCT01415778]Phase 148 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
Oral Mucosal Absorption of ICI176,334-1 in Japanese Healthy Male Subjects [NCT01415791]Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
A Phase I/II Trial of Post-Prostatectomy Radiation Therapy, Hormonal Therapy and Concurrent Docetaxel for High Risk Pathologic T2-T3NO (Tumor-3, Node-0) Prostate Cancer [NCT00669162]Phase 1/Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Completed
The Impact of Continuous Versus Intermittent Androgen Deprivation Therapy on Bone Mineral Density Change in Prostate Cancer Patients: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT04248621]Phase 4164 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-23Recruiting
A Randomised, Parallel Arm, Open-label Trial Comparing Degarelix With Goserelin Plus Anti-androgen Flare Protection (Bicalutamide), in Terms of Prostate Size Reduction in Prostate Cancer Patients of Intermediate-to-high Risk, Who Require Neoadjuvant Hormo [NCT00833248]Phase 3246 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
OMPCa-Shanghai: An Open-label, Randomized Prospective Phase II Trial of Androgen Deprivation Therapy or Androgen Deprivation Therapy Plus Definitive Treatment (Radiation or Surgery) of the Primary Tumor in Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer [NCT02742675]Phase 2200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-09-30Active, not recruiting
A Multicenter, Phase IB/II Study of Abemaciclib in Combination With Bicalutamide for Androgen Receptor-positive, HER2-negative Metastatic Breast Cancer [NCT05095207]Phase 1/Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-29Recruiting
A Feasibility Study of Oral Hormonal Therapy and Radiation for Non-metastatic, Intermediate or High Risk Prostate Cancer in Men 70 and Older or With Medical Comorbidities [NCT01342367]74 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-17Active, not recruiting
Randomized, 1-Way, Parallel, Bioequivalence Study of Bicalutamide 50 mg Tablets and Casodex® Administered as 1 x 50 mg Tablet in Healthy Subjects Under Fed Conditions [NCT00972855]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-09-30Completed
Phase Ib Study of Limited Androgen Ablation and Two Dose Levels of Temsirolimus (NSC#683864) in Patients With Prostate Cancer Who Have a Biochemical Relapse After Prostatectomy and/or Radiotherapy [NCT00512668]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Terminated
Long Term Changes in Bone Mineral Density and Fracture Risk in Patients Receiving Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Advanced Prostate Cancer, With Stratification of Treatment Based on Presenting Values [NCT00536653]618 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-10-31Completed
Pilot Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Administration of Bicalutamide (Casodex TM) Per Day in Combination With Raloxifene (Evista TM) Per Day in Patients With Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer [NCT01050842]Early Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
COMBO Trial: Camostat With Bicalutamide for COVID-19 [NCT04652765]Phase 16 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-02-03Terminated(stopped due to PI Decision to close/stop the study due to no new accrual.)
An Open Label Randomized Phase 2 Study To Evaluate The Activity, Tolerability, And Toxicity Of Combined Neoadjuvant Anti-angiogenesis and Androgen Ablation Therapy in Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy [NCT00244920]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Sponsor withdrew drug.)
A Randomized, Phase II Trial of Brief Androgen-Ablation Combined With Cell-based CG1940/CG8711 Immunotherapy For Prostate Cancer in Patients With Non-Metastatic, Biochemically Relapsed Prostate Cancer [NCT00771017]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Withdrawn
Phase II Study of Talazoparib With Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Abiraterone in Castration Sensitive Prostate Cancer [NCT04734730]Phase 270 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-04Recruiting
An Open Randomised Trial to Compare the Value of Prophylactic Versus Therapeutic Breast Radiotherapy in CASODEX Monotherapy Induced Gynaecomastia and/or Breast Pain in Prostate Cancer Patients [NCT00590213]Phase 4125 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
A Randomized Double-Blind Parallel Group Study Comparing Casodex (or Generic Equivalent) 50mg Plus Placebo to Casodex (or Generic Equivalent) 50mg Plus Dutasteride 3.5mg Administered for 18 Months to Men With Prostate Cancer Who Have Failed First-Line And [NCT00470834]Phase 4127 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
Parallel Phase III Randomized Trials of Genomic-Risk Stratified Unfavorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer: De-Intensification and Intensification Clinical Trial Evaluation (GUIDANCE) [NCT05050084]Phase 32,050 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-03Recruiting
Parallel Phase III Randomized Trials for High Risk Prostate Cancer Evaluating De-Intensification for Lower Genomic Risk and Intensification of Concurrent Therapy for Higher Genomic Risk With Radiation (PREDICT-RT*) [NCT04513717]Phase 32,478 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-15Recruiting
A Randomized Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Chemotherapy (CT) vs Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) in Patients With Recurrent and/or Metastatic, Androgen Receptor (AR) Expressing, Salivary Gland Cancer (SGCs) [NCT01969578]Phase 2149 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-24Active, not recruiting
Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/National Cancer Center of China [NCT06145308]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-01Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-blind Phase II Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Bicalutamide (Casodex® ) Associated to ZD6474 (Zactima™ ) or to Placebo in Patients With Castration-refractory Metastatic Prostate Cancer Without Any Clinical Symptom Related t [NCT00659438]Phase 295 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study of Peripheral Androgen Blockade With Bicalutamide Followed by Placebo or Treatment With the Gamma Secretase Inhibitor RO4929097 in Men With Rising PSA After Definitive Local Therapy for Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate [NCT01200810]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Drug was no longer available)
A Randomized Double-Blind Comparative Trial of Bicalutamide (Casodex™) Versus Placebo in Patients With Early Prostate Cancer. [NCT00657904]Phase 33,618 participants (Actual)Interventional1995-08-31Completed
Bioequivalence Study of ICI176,334-1 (Bicalutamide New Formulation) in Japanese Healthy Male Subjects - Evaluation of Bioequivalence of ICI176,334-1 and Casodex Tablet (80mg) [NCT01416870]Phase 1102 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Terminated
Oral Mucosal Absorption Study of ICI176,334-1 (Bicalutamide New Formulation) in Japanese Healthy Male Subjects [NCT01416883]Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Terminated
Bicalutamide Monotherapy Preserves Bone Mineral Density, Muscle Strength and Has Significant Quality of Life Benefits for Men With Advanced Prostate Cancer [NCT00551044]42 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-08-31Completed
Randomized, Multicentre, Phase III Study in Patients With Intermediate-risk T1 T2 Prostate Adenocarcinomas, to Verify the Role of Six Months of Total Androgen Blockade for Two Dosage Levels of Prostate Radiation Therapy (70 Gy and 76 Gy) Versus Prostate R [NCT00223145]Phase 3600 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-12-31Active, not recruiting
A Treatment Protocol to Monitor the Safety of a 200 mg Daily Dose of Bicalutamide (Casodex) in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer [NCT00846976]Phase 3101 participants (Actual)Interventional1994-12-31Completed
Phase 2 Trial of Maximum Androgen Blockade (MAB) Dose Escalation From 50 mg to 150 mg Bicalutamide (Casodex) for Biochemical Failure in Prostate Cancer Patients [NCT00554086]Phase 265 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
Veterans Affairs Seamless Phase II/III Randomized Trial of STAndard Systemic theRapy With or Without PET-directed Local Therapy for OligoRecurrenT Prostate Cancer (VA STARPORT) [NCT04787744]Phase 2/Phase 3464 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-01Recruiting
A Multi-centre, Single-arm, Prospective Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Hormone Therapy Using Zoladex (Goserelin) and Casodex (Bicalutamide) in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy. [NCT03971110]Phase 49 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-28Terminated(stopped due to Due to the limited potential patients pool, the enrollment goal could not be achieved. After review and communication, the decision to teminate study was made.)
A Phase II Study of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Bicalutamide Plus Aromatase Inhibitors in Estrogen Receptor(+)/Androgen Receptor(+)/HER2(-) Metastatic Breast Cancer [NCT02910050]Phase 258 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-01-31Recruiting
A Phase II Trial to Promote Recovery From COVID-19 With Endocrine Therapy [NCT04374279]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-04-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Limited resources.)
A Pilot Study of Hormonal Therapy Combined With Central Memory T Cells (Tcm) for Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer [NCT03587285]Phase 1/Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-23Active, not recruiting
A Phase III Prospective Randomized Trial of Dose-Escalated Radiotherapy With or Without Short-Term Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Patients With Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer [NCT00936390]Phase 31,538 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Active, not recruiting
Implant and External Radiation for Prostate Cancer With or Without Hormonal Therapy: A Prospective Randomized Trial [NCT00243646]Phase 36 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-08-31Terminated(stopped due to poor accrual)
Longitudinal, Randomized, Open and Prospective Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Continuous vs Intermittent Maximum Androgen Blockade (CMAB vs IMAB) With Goserelin-Bicalutamide Combination in the Treatment of Hormonal naïve With Metastatic Prosta [NCT00255268]Phase 415 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-08-31Withdrawn
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase IIb Clinical Trial of 2-Difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) Versus Bicalutamide (CASODEX) Alone and in Combination in Patients With Prostate Cancer in the Period Prior to Radical Prostatectomy or Brachytherapy: Modulation [NCT00086736]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-11-30Completed
Phase I Trial of Concurrent Taxotere With Radiation Therapy and Hormonal Therapy For Clinically Localized High Risk Prostate Cancer [NCT00099086]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-16Active, not recruiting
A Phase III Trial of Short Term Androgen Deprivation With Pelvic Lymph Node or Prostate Bed Only Radiotherapy (SPPORT) in Prostate Cancer Patients With a Rising PSA After Radical Prostatectomy [NCT00567580]Phase 31,792 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Active, not recruiting
A Phase 2 Study of GW786034 (Pazopanib) With or Without Bicalutamide in Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer [NCT00486642]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
A Phase II Randomized Trial of Bicalutamide in Patients Receiving Intravesical BCG for Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer [NCT05327647]Phase 2160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-23Recruiting
A Phase II Study of AT101, to Abrogate BCL-2 Mediated Resistance to Androgen Ablation Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Stage D2 Prostate Cancer [NCT00666666]Phase 255 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
Phase II Trial of Bicalutamide and RAD001 in Patients With Hormone-Independent Prostatic Adenocarcinoma (HIPC) After the First-Line Androgen Deprivation Therapy [NCT00814788]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
Phase I/II Randomized Trial of LBH589 (Panobinostat) at Two Dose Levels Combined With Bicalutamide (Casodex) in Men With Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer [NCT00878436]Phase 1/Phase 252 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study of Androgen Deprivation Combined With IMC-A12 Versus Androgen Deprivation Alone for Patients With New Hormone Sensitive Metastatic Prostate Cancer [NCT01120236]Phase 2211 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
Docetaxel, Estramustine and Short Term Androgen Withdrawal for Patients With a Rising PSA After Definitive Local Treatment [NCT00165399]Phase 262 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-31Completed
A Comparative Trial of the Efficacy of Two Different Nolvadex (NDX) Dosing and Scheduling Regimens in Preventing Gynecomastia Induced by Casodex (CDX) 150 Monotherapy in Prostate Cancer Patients. An Open, Multicenter, Phase III Trial. [NCT00233610]Phase 3180 participants Interventional2003-12-31Completed
Phase I/II Trial of Palbociclib in Combination With Bicalutamide for the Treatment of AR(+) Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) [NCT02605486]Phase 1/Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-11Active, not recruiting
Pilot Phase II Trial of Bevacizumab in Combination With Hormonal and Radiotherapy in Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer [NCT00348998]Phase 218 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-04-30Active, not recruiting
Phase II Trial of Abraxane Plus Hormonal Therapy as Initial Treatment of Unresectable or Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate [NCT00521781]Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Sponsor decision)
A Phase I Study Of SU5416 With Androgen Ablation And Radiation In Patients With Intermediate and Advanced Stage Prostate Cancer [NCT00026377]Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-11-30Completed
A Phase II Trial Of Oral Bicalutamide With Subcutaneous Goserelin In Patients With Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, Or Peritoneal Carcinoma In Second Or Greater Remission [NCT00012090]Phase 20 participants Interventional2000-09-30Completed
Randomized Phase III Step-Up Study On Initial Antiandrogen Monotherapy In Comparison With Watchful Waiting In Asymptomatic T1-3 Any G (Any Gleason) NO or Nx M0 Prostate Cancer Patients Without Local Treatment With Curative Intent [NCT00014586]Phase 3110 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-01-31Terminated(stopped due to low accrual)
Phase III Randomized Trial Study Comparing the Outcome of High-Dose IMRT (86.4 GY) Alone With IMRT to 75.6 GY Plus Neoadjuvant/Adjuvant Androgen Deprivation in Patients With High Grade Intermediate Risk and Unfavorable Risk Prostate Cancer [NCT00067015]Phase 33 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-05-31Completed
Three Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy / Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Alone Vs Three Dimensional Conformal Therapy / Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Plus Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy In Localized T1b-c, T2a, N0, M0 Prostatic Carcinoma. A Phase III Ran [NCT00021450]Phase 3819 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-04-30Completed
Phase III Randomized Study of Adjuvant Therapy for High Risk pT3N0 Prostate Cancer [NCT00023829]Phase 367 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-08-31Completed
A Phase III Randomized Study of Patients With High Risk, Hormone-Naive Prostate Cancer: Androgen Blockade With 4 Cycles of Immediate Chemotherapy Versus Androgen Blockade With Delayed Chemotherapy [NCT00030654]Phase 321 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-10-31Completed
A Randomized Phase II Trial of Exemestane With and Without Bicalutamide as Second Line Therapy After Failure of Androgen Suppression in Advanced Prostate Cancer [NCT00031889]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-08-31Completed
A Phase 1, Open Label, Non-Randomized, Dose Escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety of CP-675,206 in Combination With Neoadjuvant Androgen Ablation and a Phase 2, Open Label, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of CP-675,206 in Combination With Neoa [NCT00075192]Phase 1/Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-31Completed
A Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Androgen Suppression and Elective Pelvic Nodal Irradiation Followed by High Dose 3-D Conformal Boost Versus Androgen Suppression and Elective Pelvic Nodal Irradiation Followed by 125-Iodine Brachytherapy Implant Boos [NCT00175396]Phase 3400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-05-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Trial of Avastin, Docetaxel and Androgen Deprivation Followed by Continued Avastin and Androgen Deprivation for Men With a Rising Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) After Local Therapy [NCT00658697]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
The Role of HER Receptor Family as Indicator of Prognosis and Drug Responsiveness in Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer [NCT00418080]Phase 286 participants Interventional2002-04-30Completed
A Randomised Pilot Study to Evaluate the Effect(s) of Casodex 150 mg and Zoladex 3.6 mg on Pathological and Genomic Tumour Markers in Subjects Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Localised Prostate Carcinoma [NCT00293696]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-31Completed
Phase II Randomized Comparative Trial of TAK-700 (Orteronel) Versus Bicalutamide in Metastatic Prostate Cancer Patients Failing 1st Line Treatment With LHRH Agonists or Surgical Castration. [NCT01658527]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Pharmaceutical company has terminated orteronel (TAK-700) development for Prostate Cancer)
A Phase I Pilot Study of Samarium-153 Combined With Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy and Radiation Therapy in Men With Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer [NCT00328614]Phase 132 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-03-31Completed
Feasibility of Cytoreductive Prostatectomy in Men Newly Diagnosed With Metastatic Prostate Cancer [NCT02458716]Phase 126 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-06Completed
Phase I/II Study of Sorafenib Concurrent With Androgen Deprivation and Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Intermediate- and High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer [NCT00924807]Phase 1/Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Sponsor closed the trial)
A Phase II Trial of RAD001 and Bicalutamide for Androgen Independent Prostate Cancer [NCT00630344]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
Randomized Phase II Screening Trial of Enzalutamide/MDV-3100 and LHRH Analogue vs Combined Androgen Deprivation (LHRH Analogue + Bicalutamide) in Metastatic Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer [NCT02058706]Phase 271 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
Bicalutamide for the Treatment of Androgen Receptor Positive (AR(+)), Estrogen Receptor Negative, Progesterone Receptor Negative (ER(-)/PR(-)) Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: A Phase II Feasibility Study [NCT00468715]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-23Completed
Androgen Deprivation Therapy With or Without Radium-223 Dichloride in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Prostate Cancer With Bone Metastases: Hoosier Cancer Research Network GU13-170 [NCT02582749]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Funding withdrawn)
STRIVE: A MULTICENTER PHASE 2, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, EFFICACY AND SAFETY STUDY OF ENZALUTAMIDE VS. BICALUTAMIDE IN MEN WITH PROSTATE CANCER WHO HAVE FAILED PRIMARY ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION THERAPY [NCT01664923]Phase 2396 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Completed
Androgen Receptor Modulation Phase II, Randomized Study of MK-2206 - Bicalutamide Combination in Patients With Rising PSA at High-Risk of Progression After Primary Therapy [NCT01251861]Phase 2108 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-23Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of Definitive Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Men With Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer [NCT02716974]Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-30Completed
Phase III Randomized Study Of Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy With And Without Docetaxel And Estramustine In Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer Or With A High Risk Of Relapse [NCT00055731]Phase 3413 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-11-14Completed
Pilot Phase II Trial of Bevacizumab in Combination With Hormonal and Radiotherapy in Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer [NCT00349557]Phase 218 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
Long Term Adjuvant Hormonal Treatment With LHRH Analogue Versus No Further Treatment in Locally Advanced Prostatic Carcinoma Treated by External Irradiation and a Six Months Combined Androgen Blockade - A Phase III Study [NCT00003026]Phase 3966 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1997-04-30Completed
Phase II Study of Antineoplastons A10 and AS2-1 Capsules With Total Androgen Blockade in Patients With Stage III or IV Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate [NCT00003517]Phase 20 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn
An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase III Study to Assess the Impact of Transient Androgenic Deprivation With Enantone LP 11.25 Mg (Leuprorelin) on the Histological Progression of Indolent Prostate Cancer [NCT02085252]Phase 3116 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-03Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study of Androgen Deprivation Therapy With or Without Palbociclib in RB-Positive Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer [NCT02059213]Phase 272 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
[NCT00421694]Phase 2/Phase 3119 participants InterventionalCompleted
The RolE oF Androgen Excess in MUscle Energy MetaboLism in Women With PolyCystic Ovary Syndrome (REFUEL PCOS) Study 2 [NCT05647356]16 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-01Not yet recruiting
A Phase II Study of Definitive Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Men With Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer After Prostatectomy [NCT03043807]Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-22Completed
Randomized Phase II Study of Salvage XRT + ADT +/- Abiraterone Acetate and Apalutamide (ARN-509) for Rising PSA After Radical Prostatectomy With Adverse Features.(FORMULA-509 Trial) [NCT03141671]Phase 2345 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-24Active, not recruiting
Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy Followed by Salvage Surgery for High Risk PSA Failure With Biopsy Proven Local Recurrence After Initial Definitive Radiotherapy [NCT01531205]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Terminated(stopped due to low accrual)
Maximal Suppression of the Androgen Axis in Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer [NCT00298155]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
Phase I Dose Escalation Trial of CP-675,206 (Tremelimumab, Anti-CTLA-4 Monoclonal Antibody) in Combination With Short Term Androgen Deprivation in Patients With Stage D0 Prostate Cancer [NCT00702923]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Enrollment was halted prematurely due to slow accrual.)
A Prospective, Single Center, Phase II Study of Bicalutamide as A Treatment in Androgen Receptor (AR)-Positive Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (mTNBC) Patients [NCT02348281]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Terminated(stopped due to it's too slow to enroll suitable patients into this study)
Phase III Randomized Trial Comparing Total Androgen Blockade Versus Total Androgen Blockade Plus Pelvic Irradiation in Clinical Stage T3-4, N0, M0 Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate [NCT00002633]Phase 3361 participants (Actual)Interventional1995-02-08Completed
Phase III Randomized Trial of Standard Systemic Therapy (SST) Versus Standard Systemic Therapy Plus Definitive Treatment (Surgery or Radiation) of the Primary Tumor in Metastatic Prostate Cancer [NCT03678025]Phase 31,273 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-09-24Recruiting
Exploratory Study of Molecular Profile-Associated Evidence Guided Precision Therapy for Salivary Gland Cancer [NCT05087706]182 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2021-07-30Recruiting
A Phase III Protocol of Androgen Suppression (AS) and Radiation Therapy (RT) vs AS and RT Followed by Chemotherapy With Paclitaxel, Estramustine, and Etoposide (TEE) for Localized, High-Risk, Prostate Cancer [NCT00004054]Phase 3397 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-01-31Completed
Stereotactic Prostate Radiotherapy With or Without Androgen Deprivation Therapy, a Phase III, Multi-institutional Randomized-controlled Trial. The SPA Trial. [NCT05019846]Phase 3310 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-30Recruiting
Signal TrAnsduction Pathway Activity Analysis in OVarian cancER [NCT03458221]Phase 2/Phase 3148 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-31Recruiting
Randomized Trial of External Beam Radiation With or Without Short-Course Hormonal Therapy in Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer Patients [NCT00388804]Phase 339 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual.)
Pilot Neoadjuvant Trial of Chemohormonal Therapy Followed by Prostatectomy in Patients With High Risk or Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer [NCT03358563]Early Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-17Completed
Randomized, Bioequivalence Study of Bicalutamide 50 mg Tablet and Casodex® 50 mg Tablet Following a 50 mg Dose in Healthy Subjects Under Fed Conditions [NCT01044706]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
Bicalutamide With or Without Metformin for Biochemical Recurrence in Overweight or Obese Prostate Cancer Patients (BIMET-1) [NCT02614859]Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-01Completed
A Phase 3 Trial of Androgen Ablation Alone vs. Chemo/Hormonal Therapy as Initial Treatment of Unresectable/Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate [NCT00002855]Phase 3306 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-08-31Completed
A Phase III Randomized Trial Comparing Intermittent Versus Continuous Androgen Suppression for Patients With Prostate-Specific-Antigen Progression in the Clinical Absence of Distant Metastases Following Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer [NCT00003653]Phase 31,386 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-01-05Completed
Docetaxel Followed by Radical Prostatectomy in Patients With High Risk Localized Prostate Cancer [NCT01250717]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-01-31Completed
Randomized Phase II Trial of Short-Course Androgen Deprivation Therapy +/- Bevacizumab for PSA Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Definitive Local Therapy [NCT00776594]Phase 2102 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Whole-Pelvic Radiotherapy With a Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Boost and Long-Term Androgen Deprivation for Unfavorable-Intermediate and High Risk Localized Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate. [NCT02064036]Phase 117 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-06Completed
Phase II Randomized Open Label Study of Neo-Adjuvant Degarelix vs. LHRH Agonist in Prostate Cancer Patients Prior to Radical Prostatectomy [NCT01674270]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Completed
A Multi-institutional Phase I and Biomarker Study of Everolimus Added to Combined Hormonal and Radiation Therapy for High Risk Prostate Cancer [NCT01642732]Phase 11 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Lack of accrual and funding expires in June, 2014.)
STEEL: A Randomized Phase II Trial of Salvage Radiotherapy With Standard vs Enhanced Androgen Deprivation Therapy (With Enzalutamide) in Patients With Post-Prostatectomy PSA Recurrences With Aggressive Disease Features [NCT03809000]Phase 2188 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-15Active, not recruiting
Phase II Study of Bicalutamide and Dutasteride for Prostate Cytoreduction Prior to Permanent Implant I-125 Prostate Brachytherapy [NCT00866554]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
Phase Ib Dose Finding Study of BKM 120 in Combination With LH-RH Agonists and Bicalutamide in Men With Non Castrate Metastatic Prostate Cancer [NCT02487823]Phase 16 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Defect of recruitment)
PERSONALIZED MEDICINE GROUP / UCBG UC-0105/1304: SAFIR02_Breast - Evaluation of the Efficacy of High Throughput Genome Analysis as a Therapeutic Decision Tool for Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer [NCT02299999]Phase 21,460 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-07Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Immunotherapeutic Trial: Combination Androgen Ablative Therapy and CTLA-4 Blockade as a Treatment for Advanced Prostate Cancer [NCT00170157]Phase 2112 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-30Completed
Phase I Trial of Weekly Cabazitaxel With Concurrent Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and Androgen Deprivation Therapy for the Treatment of Locally Advanced High Risk Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate [NCT01420250]Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-09-22Active, not recruiting
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00002651 (6) [back to overview]Emotional Functioning as Measured by the SF-36 Mental Health Inventory
NCT00002651 (6) [back to overview]Erectile Dysfunction
NCT00002651 (6) [back to overview]High Libido
NCT00002651 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00002651 (6) [back to overview]Physical Functioning as Measured by the SF-36
NCT00002651 (6) [back to overview]Vitality
NCT00002874 (9) [back to overview]Non-Prostate Cancer Death (12-year Rates Reported)
NCT00002874 (9) [back to overview]Grade 3+ Toxicity
NCT00002874 (9) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (12-year Rates Reported)
NCT00002874 (9) [back to overview]Distant Failure (12-year Rates Reported)
NCT00002874 (9) [back to overview]Overall Survival (12-year Rates Reported)
NCT00002874 (9) [back to overview]Prostate Cancer Death (12-year Rates Reported)
NCT00002874 (9) [back to overview]PSA Complete Response at End of Protocol Treatment
NCT00002874 (9) [back to overview]Second PSA Recurrence (12-year Rates Reported)
NCT00002874 (9) [back to overview]Third PSA Recurrence (12-year Rates Reported)
NCT00003645 (2) [back to overview]"Number of Wives of the Participants Having Better Than or Equal to a Good Quality of Life"
NCT00003645 (2) [back to overview]Quality of Life for Participants
NCT00004054 (5) [back to overview]Rate of Biochemical Failure at 5 Years
NCT00004054 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival (5-year Rate Reported)
NCT00004054 (5) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival Rate at 5 Years
NCT00004054 (5) [back to overview]Rate of Local Progression at 5 Years
NCT00004054 (5) [back to overview]Rate of Distant Metastasis at Five Years
NCT00004124 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00004124 (3) [back to overview]Compare Qualitative and Quantitative Toxicities of These Regimens in These Patients
NCT00004124 (3) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival
NCT00005044 (7) [back to overview]Disease-specific Survival (DSS) (10-year Rates Reported)
NCT00005044 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) (10-year Rates Reported)
NCT00005044 (7) [back to overview]Time to Second Biochemical Failure (SBF) (10-year Rates Reported)
NCT00005044 (7) [back to overview]Clinical Patterns of Tumor Recurrence: Time to Locoregional Progression (LRP) and Time to Distant Metastasis (DM) (10 Year Rates Reported)
NCT00005044 (7) [back to overview]Time to First Biochemical Failure (BF) (10-year Rates Reported)
NCT00005044 (7) [back to overview]Treatment-induced Morbidity (Highest Grade Toxicity Reported Per Patient)
NCT00005044 (7) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival (DFS) (10-year Rates Reported)
NCT00028769 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Grade 3 Through Grade 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drug
NCT00028769 (3) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00028769 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00094328 (9) [back to overview]Change in Average Testicular Volume
NCT00094328 (9) [back to overview]Change in Predicted Adult Height (PAH)
NCT00094328 (9) [back to overview]Change in Growth Rate (SD Units)
NCT00094328 (9) [back to overview]Change in Growth Rate (SD Units)
NCT00094328 (9) [back to overview]Change in Growth Rate (cm/Year)
NCT00094328 (9) [back to overview]Change in Growth Rate (cm/Year)
NCT00094328 (9) [back to overview]Change in Bone Age Maturation Rate (cm/Year)
NCT00094328 (9) [back to overview]Change in Bone Age to Chronological Age Ratio
NCT00094328 (9) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Height Between 5th and 95th Percentile
NCT00108732 (4) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With PSA Response
NCT00108732 (4) [back to overview]The Difference Between PSA Slopes Before and After Treatment
NCT00108732 (4) [back to overview]Difference Between Day 4 PSA Level and Day 15 PSA Level
NCT00108732 (4) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Free of PSA Progression at 6 Months (Prior to the Start of Androgen Ablation)
NCT00170157 (2) [back to overview]Percent of Participants With Undetectable Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response
NCT00170157 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Progression-free at 18 Months
NCT00298155 (2) [back to overview]To Determine the Effects of Different Modes of Androgen Deprivation on Serum DHT
NCT00298155 (2) [back to overview]Prostate Tissue DHT
NCT00328614 (1) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose of Samarium-153
NCT00388804 (1) [back to overview]Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Failures
NCT00468715 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants Evaluated for Toxicity
NCT00470834 (5) [back to overview]Time to Disease Progression
NCT00470834 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total PSA at Months 6, 12, 18, 21, and 42
NCT00470834 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Metastatic Disease
NCT00470834 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With PSA Response
NCT00470834 (5) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure
NCT00486642 (7) [back to overview]PSA Response Rate
NCT00486642 (7) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00486642 (7) [back to overview]Objective Tumor Response Rate as Assessed by RECIST Criteria
NCT00486642 (7) [back to overview]Toxicity
NCT00486642 (7) [back to overview]Median Duration of PSA-Response
NCT00486642 (7) [back to overview]Time to Disease Progression
NCT00486642 (7) [back to overview]Stable Disease Rate as Assessed by RECIST Criteria
NCT00514917 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Trial Outcome Index (TOI) Score at EOT
NCT00514917 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT00514917 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Index Score at EOT
NCT00514917 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Total Score at End of Treatment (EOT)
NCT00514917 (11) [back to overview]Cancer-Specific Survival: Number of Participants Who Died (Cancer-Specific)
NCT00514917 (11) [back to overview]Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population
NCT00514917 (11) [back to overview]Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Testosterone Specific Evaluable Population
NCT00514917 (11) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS): Number of Participants Who Died (All Cause)
NCT00514917 (11) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Month 36 in ITT Population
NCT00514917 (11) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Month 36 in Testosterone Specific Evaluable Population
NCT00514917 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Erectile Function Domain of International Index of Erectile Function (EF-IIEF) Total Score at EOT
NCT00528866 (9) [back to overview]Overall Survival (3-year Rate)
NCT00528866 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants Free From Progression at 3 Years
NCT00528866 (9) [back to overview]Prostate Cancer Death (3-year Rate)
NCT00528866 (9) [back to overview]Non-prostate Cancer Death (3-year Rate)
NCT00528866 (9) [back to overview]"Number of Patients With Acute Adverse Events (Based on CTCAE, v3.0)"
NCT00528866 (9) [back to overview]"Time to Late Grade 3+ Adverse Events (Based on CTCAE, v3.0)"
NCT00528866 (9) [back to overview]Distant Metastasis (3-year Rate)
NCT00528866 (9) [back to overview]Local-regional Progression (3 Year Rate)
NCT00528866 (9) [back to overview]Time to Biochemical (PSA) Failure (3-year Rate)
NCT00544830 (7) [back to overview]CR Without ADT in Patients With Metastases Limited to Pelvic Lymph Nodes.
NCT00544830 (7) [back to overview]Follow-up of the 8 Patients With Metastases Limited to Pelvic Lymph Nodes.
NCT00544830 (7) [back to overview]Length of Follow-up
NCT00544830 (7) [back to overview]Patients Who Achieved PSA Nadir of < 0.2 at 36 Weeks.
NCT00544830 (7) [back to overview]Time to Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Relapse
NCT00544830 (7) [back to overview]Rate of Treatment Failure (no PSA Threshold Below 4 ng/dl, or no PSA Below Baseline Level Before LHRH Treatment).
NCT00544830 (7) [back to overview]Count of Patients Remaining Off of Therapy
NCT00567580 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to Prostate Cancer (Cause-specific Mortality)
NCT00567580 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Free From Progression (FFP) at 5 Years
NCT00567580 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Free From Hormone-refractory Disease (Castrate-resistant Disease)
NCT00567580 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Alive (Overall Mortality)
NCT00567580 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Distant Metastasis
NCT00567580 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 2+ and 3+ Adverse Events ≤ 90 Days of the Completion of Radiotherapy (RT)
NCT00567580 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Local Failure
NCT00567580 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Secondary Biochemical Failure (Alternative Biochemical Failure)
NCT00567580 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing Late Grade 2+ and 3+ Adverse Events > 90 Days From the Completion of Radiotherapy (RT)
NCT00586898 (1) [back to overview]Response
NCT00589472 (6) [back to overview]Levels of DHEA-S in Blood From Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
NCT00589472 (6) [back to overview]Levels of Testosterone in Blood From Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
NCT00589472 (6) [back to overview]Levels of PSA in Blood From Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
NCT00589472 (6) [back to overview]Gleason Score
NCT00589472 (6) [back to overview]Levels of DHEA in Blood From Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
NCT00589472 (6) [back to overview]Levels of DHT in Blood From Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
NCT00630344 (6) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT00630344 (6) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT00630344 (6) [back to overview]Incidence of Grade 4 Treatment-Related Toxicity
NCT00630344 (6) [back to overview]Incidence of Grade 1-3 Treatment-Related Rash Toxicity
NCT00630344 (6) [back to overview]Incidence of Grade 1-3 Treatment-Related Mucositis Toxicity
NCT00630344 (6) [back to overview]Incidence of Grade 1-3 Treatment-Related Fatigue Toxicity
NCT00658697 (5) [back to overview]Time to PSA Progression (TTP)
NCT00658697 (5) [back to overview]Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Progression at 1 Year After Completing Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT)
NCT00658697 (5) [back to overview]Toxicity
NCT00658697 (5) [back to overview]Testosterone Recovery
NCT00658697 (5) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With PSA Responses at One Year After the Completion of ADT
NCT00659438 (6) [back to overview]PSA Response Rate
NCT00659438 (6) [back to overview]Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Progression Free Rate at 4 Months
NCT00659438 (6) [back to overview]Progression Rate From the Radionuclide Bone Scanning
NCT00659438 (6) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) at 4 Months (Instead of Time to PSA Progression)
NCT00659438 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00659438 (6) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) at 4 Months (Instead of Time to Onset of Cancer-related Symptoms)
NCT00666666 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Overall PSA < 4.0 ng/mL
NCT00666666 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL But < 4.0 ng/mL
NCT00666666 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Undetectable Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) (< 0.2 ng/mL) at End of 7 Cycles
NCT00669162 (1) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Who Can Safely Tolerate and Complete Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy, Radiation Therapy and Docetaxel After a Radical Prostatectomy
NCT00702923 (3) [back to overview]The Number of Participants With an Increase in PSA Doubling Time
NCT00702923 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With PSA Recurrence.
NCT00702923 (3) [back to overview]The Number of Participants Who Developed Cancer Antigen-specific Immune Responses
NCT00776594 (4) [back to overview]Analysis of Cytokines and Angiogenic Factors in Plasma/Serum
NCT00776594 (4) [back to overview]Cardiovascular Safety Including Measurement of Blood Pressure During Treatment Period (6 Months).
NCT00776594 (4) [back to overview]Relapse-free Survival
NCT00776594 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With PSA <0.2 ng/ml at Six Months
NCT00814788 (3) [back to overview]PSA Response Rate
NCT00814788 (3) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00814788 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00831233 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Vital Signs and Body Weight
NCT00831233 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Testosterone <=0.5 Nanograms/Milliliter at Each Visit
NCT00831233 (10) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Concentration at Each Visit
NCT00831233 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Safety Laboratory Variables
NCT00831233 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 12
NCT00831233 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total IPSS at Weeks 4 and 8
NCT00831233 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Residual Volume (Vresidual) at Each Visit
NCT00831233 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Related to Urinary Symptoms at Each Visit
NCT00831233 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Maximum Urine Flow (Qmax) at Each Visit
NCT00831233 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Prostate Size Based on Trans Rectal Ultra Sound (TRUS) at Week 12
NCT00833248 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Related to Urinary Symptoms at Each Visit
NCT00833248 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Oestradiol Levels During the Study
NCT00833248 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels During the Study
NCT00833248 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Vital Signs and Body Weight
NCT00833248 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Safety Laboratory Variables
NCT00833248 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 4, 8, and 12
NCT00833248 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Serum Testosterone Levels During the Study
NCT00833248 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Prostate Size Based on Trans Rectal Ultra Sound (TRUS) at Week 12 (Full Analysis Set)
NCT00833248 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Prostate Size Based on Trans Rectal Ultra Sound (TRUS) at Week 12 (Per Protocol Analysis Set)
NCT00878436 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Free of Progression and Without Symptomatic Deterioration
NCT00878436 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Free of Progression and Without Symptomatic Deterioration
NCT00884273 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 4, 8, and 12
NCT00884273 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Vital Signs and Body Weight
NCT00884273 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Safety Laboratory Variables
NCT00884273 (10) [back to overview]Change in Serum Testosterone Levels During the Study
NCT00884273 (10) [back to overview]Change in Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels During the Study
NCT00884273 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Prostate Size Based on TRUS at Week 4 and 8
NCT00884273 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Related to Urinary Symptoms at Each Visit
NCT00884273 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Burden of Urinary Symptoms Based on the Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index (BPHII)
NCT00884273 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Prostate Size Based on Trans Rectal Ultra Sound (TRUS) at Week 12 (Per Protocol Analysis Set)
NCT00884273 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Prostate Size Based on Trans Rectal Ultra Sound (TRUS) at Week 12 (Full Analysis Set)
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Distant Metastasis
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Bowel Domain Score
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Local Recurrence
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Late Grade 3+ Adverse Events
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Acute Adverse Events
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Alive (Overall Survival)
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Dead Due to Cause Other Than Prostate Cancer (Non-Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality)
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Dead Due to Prostate Cancer (Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality)
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Failed (Freedom From Failure)
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Failure
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Hormonal Domain Score
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Sexual Domain Score
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Urinary Domain Score
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Domain Score
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Alive (Overall Survival) by Radiation Therapy Modality
NCT00936390 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Receiving Salvage Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT)
NCT01020305 (1) [back to overview]Reduction in Serum PSA
NCT01044706 (2) [back to overview]Cmax (Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)
NCT01044706 (2) [back to overview]AUC0-144 (Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 144 Hour Post-dose)
NCT01120236 (8) [back to overview]Correlation of microRNA Measures With 28-week PSA Response
NCT01120236 (8) [back to overview]Toxicity
NCT01120236 (8) [back to overview]Correlation of microRNA Measures With Baseline Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) Counts
NCT01120236 (8) [back to overview]Change in Level of Insulin
NCT01120236 (8) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Who do Not Achieve a Partial PSA Response
NCT01120236 (8) [back to overview]Undetectable PSA Rate
NCT01120236 (8) [back to overview]Change in Level of IGF-I, Free IGF-I and C-peptide
NCT01120236 (8) [back to overview]Change in Level of IGFBP2, IGFBP3 and Growth Hormone
NCT01200810 (1) [back to overview]Safety and Tolerability Assessed Using NCI CTCAE Version 4.0
NCT01250717 (1) [back to overview]Pathologic Complete Response Was Assessed by Rigorous Pathological Examination by One of Two Pathologists
NCT01251861 (11) [back to overview]Time to PSA Nadir
NCT01251861 (11) [back to overview]Time to PSA Progression
NCT01251861 (11) [back to overview]The Association Between Gleason Score and PSA Response
NCT01251861 (11) [back to overview]The Association Between Prior Hormonal Therapy and PSA Response
NCT01251861 (11) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With PSA Response
NCT01251861 (11) [back to overview]Duration of PSA Response
NCT01251861 (11) [back to overview]PSA Slope After Starting Bicalutamide Treatment
NCT01251861 (11) [back to overview]PSA Slope Prior to Randomization
NCT01251861 (11) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With PSA Decline > 85% at 44 Weeks
NCT01251861 (11) [back to overview]The Proportion of Patients With Undetectable PSA Level (< 0.2 ng/mL) at 44 Weeks
NCT01251861 (11) [back to overview]PSA Slope After Randomization and Before Starting Bicalutamide
NCT01288911 (12) [back to overview]Best PSA Response
NCT01288911 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response
NCT01288911 (12) [back to overview]PFS Based on Investigator Assessment
NCT01288911 (12) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Independent Central Review (ICR) Assessment
NCT01288911 (12) [back to overview]Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response by Week 13
NCT01288911 (12) [back to overview]Radiographic PFS Based on ICR Assessment
NCT01288911 (12) [back to overview]Time to ≥ 30% PSA Decline From Baseline
NCT01288911 (12) [back to overview]Time to ≥ 50% PSA Decline From Baseline
NCT01288911 (12) [back to overview]Time to ≥ 90% PSA Decline From Baseline
NCT01288911 (12) [back to overview]Time to PSA ≤ 4 ng/mL
NCT01288911 (12) [back to overview]Time to PSA Progression
NCT01288911 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT01342367 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Free From Biochemical Failure
NCT01342367 (2) [back to overview]Quality of Life Was Measured by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Hormonal Health-related Quality of Life Questionnaire
NCT01531205 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of PSA Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01531205 (5) [back to overview]Surgical Margin Negative Rate (SM Rate)
NCT01531205 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of Detecting Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC)
NCT01531205 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of Complete Response (CR)
NCT01531205 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of Perioperative and Postoperative Morbidity
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Testosterone Recovery at 12 and 24 Months
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Change in Patient-reported Quality of Life as Measured by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Short Form at One Year
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Distant Metastases
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With General Clinical Treatment Failure
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Local Progression
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Alive [Overall Survival] (Primary Endpoint of Original Protocol)
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Hemoglobin A1c
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Death Due to Prostate Cancer
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Failure (Primary Endpoint of Revised Protocol)
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form at One Year
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Serum Testosterone
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Serum High-density Lipoprotein (LDL)
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Serum High-density Lipoprotein (HDL)
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Clinical Survivorship Events
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse Event
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Median Testosterone Recovery Time
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Fasting Total Cholesterol
NCT01546987 (20) [back to overview]Fasting Plasma Glucose
NCT01664923 (7) [back to overview]Best Overall Soft Tissue Response
NCT01664923 (7) [back to overview]Quality of Life: Time to Degradation of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (FACT-P)
NCT01664923 (7) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01664923 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01664923 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a PSA Response ≥ 50%
NCT01664923 (7) [back to overview]Time to PSA Progression
NCT01664923 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Radiographic PFS
NCT01809691 (4) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT01809691 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01809691 (4) [back to overview]PSA Response Rates
NCT01809691 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Gr 3 Through 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drugs
NCT02058706 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With PSA Remission Assessed Using the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group (PCWG2) Criteria
NCT02058706 (10) [back to overview]Overall Survival at 2 Years
NCT02058706 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Progression-free at 6 Months
NCT02058706 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Bone Metastases Progression Free at Six Months
NCT02058706 (10) [back to overview]The Percentage of Patients Responding
NCT02058706 (10) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure
NCT02058706 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Progression Free at One Year
NCT02058706 (10) [back to overview]Achievement of PSA Response Assessed Using PCWG2 Criteria
NCT02058706 (10) [back to overview]The Number of Participants With a CTC Response
NCT02058706 (10) [back to overview]Achievement of Measurable Disease Response
NCT02059213 (8) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Who Achieve Undetectable PSA (<0.2ng/mL)
NCT02059213 (8) [back to overview]Biochemical Progression-free Survival Rate
NCT02059213 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade >=3 Adverse Events That Are Possibly, Probably or Definitely Related to Study Treatment
NCT02059213 (8) [back to overview]Clinical Progression-free Survival Rate
NCT02059213 (8) [back to overview]Frequency of Dose Modification
NCT02059213 (8) [back to overview]Frequency of Treatment Delay
NCT02059213 (8) [back to overview]Duration of Therapy
NCT02059213 (8) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Achieve a PSA ≤ 4ng/mL After Seven Months of Protocol Treatment in Each Arm
NCT02085252 (8) [back to overview]Prostatic Volume as a Measure of Tumor Radiologic Progression Using Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
NCT02085252 (8) [back to overview]Highest Diameter of the Lesion as a Measure of Tumor Radiologic Progression Using Dynamic MRI
NCT02085252 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) Total Symptom (S) Score
NCT02085252 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) Questionnaire Score
NCT02085252 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Levels
NCT02085252 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Score
NCT02085252 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Negative Biopsies at Month 12
NCT02085252 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Gleason Score ≥ 7
NCT02614859 (5) [back to overview]Biochemical Response Rate Based on PSA
NCT02614859 (5) [back to overview]BMI Decline After 32 Weeks
NCT02614859 (5) [back to overview]PSA Decline
NCT02614859 (5) [back to overview]PSA Decline ≥ 85% at 32 Weeks
NCT02614859 (5) [back to overview]Median PSA Decline
NCT02716974 (3) [back to overview]Safety of the Multimodality Therapy as Assessed by Number of Participants With Neutropenia and Surgical or Radiation Toxicities
NCT02716974 (3) [back to overview]Efficacy as Assessed by 2-year PSA Progression-free Survival Rate
NCT02716974 (3) [back to overview]Time to Prostate-specific Antigen Recurrence
NCT03043807 (1) [back to overview]Time to Prostate-specific Antigen Recurrence
NCT04652765 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants Requiring Hospitalization
NCT04652765 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Symptoms
NCT04652765 (5) [back to overview]Number of Drug-related Serious Adverse Events
NCT04652765 (5) [back to overview]Number of Drug-related Adverse Events
NCT04652765 (5) [back to overview]All-cause Mortality

Emotional Functioning as Measured by the SF-36 Mental Health Inventory

This outcome was scored on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better functioning. Change from Baseline in SF-36 Score at 3 Months (NCT00002651)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Continuous Hormonal Therapy-0.95
Intermittent Hormonal Therapy1.92

[back to top]

Erectile Dysfunction

This outcome was assessed by having patients report whether they had erectile dysfunction (a score of 1) or no erectile dysfunction (a score of 0). This analysis looks at change from Baseline to 3 Months. (NCT00002651)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Continuous Hormonal Therapy2
Intermittent Hormonal Therapy-7

[back to top]

High Libido

"This outcome was assessed by having patients report whether their interest in sexual activities was very high, high, or moderate (a score of 1) or low or very low (a score of 0). This outcome measure is reporting a change from baseline in the percentage of participants with High Libido at 3 months. High Libido is defined as very high, high or moderate interest in sexual activities." (NCT00002651)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Continuous Hormonal Therapy-2
Intermittent Hormonal Therapy16

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Non-inferiority test to determine if intermittent combined androgen deprivation (CAD) overall survival is not substantially worse than continuous CAD overall survival. Specifically, the trial is designed for a one-sided test of the hypothesis that the hazard ratio of intermittent CAD to continuous CAD is 1.2. The assumptions used to compute the trial size are an overall type I error rate of 0.05 and a type II error of 0.10 (power = 0.9). (NCT00002651)
Timeframe: Up to 15 years

Interventionyears (Median)
Consolidation Arm I5.8
Consolidation Arm II5.1

[back to top]

Physical Functioning as Measured by the SF-36

This outcome was scored on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better functioning. Change from Baseline in SF-36 Score at 3 Months (NCT00002651)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Continuous Hormonal Therapy-1.74
Intermittent Hormonal Therapy0.09

[back to top]

Vitality

This outcome was scored on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better functioning. This analysis looks at mean change from Baseline score to 3 Months. (NCT00002651)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Continuous Hormonal Therapy-1.42
Intermittent Hormonal Therapy-0.11

[back to top]

Non-Prostate Cancer Death (12-year Rates Reported)

"Non-prostate cancer death rates were estimated by the cumulative incidence method, with failure defined as any death that does not fall into the following categories: death due to prostate cancer or complications of protocol treatment (centrally reviewed), death with known progressive metastatic disease while on salvage hormone therapy, or death with a known rising PSA while on salvage hormone therapy. All other deaths are considered competing risks. Patients alive at time of analysis were censored. Any other death was treated as a competing risk. Four-year follow-up was required of all patients, but twelve-year rates were reported.~Patients are followed until death. Non-Prostate cancer death is a more accurate wording for the protocol endpoint of non-disease-specific survival, and matches the protocol definition." (NCT00002874)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to 12 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo15.3
Bicalutamide17.9

[back to top]

Grade 3+ Toxicity

"Adverse events are graded using the Cooperative Group Common Toxicity Criteria and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Radiation Morbidity Scoring. Grade refers to severity, assigning Grades 1 through 5 based on this general guideline: Grade 0 None, Grade 1 Mild, Grade 2 Moderate, Grade 3 Severe, Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling, Grade 5 Death related toxicity. Toxicities reported to have occurred within 90 days from the start of radiotherapy are reported as Acute Radiotherapy, all later toxicities are reported as Hormone therapy and late radiotherapy toxicity. The highest grade toxicity event per subject is counted within each of these time periods. Four-year follow-up was required of all patients; patients are followed until death." (NCT00002874)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to four years.

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Acute radiotherapy toxicityHormone therapy and late radiotherapy toxicity
Bicalutamide8100
Placebo1773

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (12-year Rates Reported)

"Progress-free survival rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, with failure defined as the first occurrence of PSA failure, local, regional or distant failure, or death from any cause. Patients alive without progression at time of analysis were censored. Four-year follow-up was required of all patients, but twelve-year rates were reported. Patients are followed until death. Progression-free Survival is more accurate wording for the protocol endpoint of Freedom from Progression, and matches the protocol definition." (NCT00002874)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to 12 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo23.9
Bicalutamide38.8

[back to top]

Distant Failure (12-year Rates Reported)

Distant failure rates were estimated by the cumulative incidence method, with failure defined as the first occurrence of distant failure. Patients alive without distant metastases at time of analysis were censored. Death without distant metastasis was treated as a competing risk. Four-year follow-up was required of all patients, but twelve-year rates were reported. Patients are followed until death. (NCT00002874)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to 12 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo23.0
Bicalutamide14.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival (12-year Rates Reported)

"Overall survival rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, with failure defined as death by any cause. Four-year follow-up was required of all patients, twelve-year rates are reported. Four-year follow-up was required of all patients, but twelve-year rates were reported.~Patients are followed until death." (NCT00002874)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to 12 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo71.3
Bicalutamide76.3

[back to top]

Prostate Cancer Death (12-year Rates Reported)

"Prostate cancer death rates were estimated by the cumulative incidence method, with failure defined as death due to prostate cancer or complications of protocol treatment (centrally reviewed), death with known progressive metastatic disease while on salvage hormone therapy, or death with a known rising PSA while on salvage hormone therapy. Patients alive at time of analysis were censored. Any other death was treated as a competing risk. Four-year follow-up was required of all patients, but twelve-year rates were reported. Patients are followed until death. Prostate cancer death is a more accurate wording for the protocol endpoint of disease-specific survival, and matches the protocol definition." (NCT00002874)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to 12 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo13.4
Bicalutamide5.8

[back to top]

PSA Complete Response at End of Protocol Treatment

Complete response is defined as a drop in PSA on protocol treatment to less than 0.2 ng/ml. Note that when the study opened many institutions could not detect PSA < 05 ng/ml. (NCT00002874)
Timeframe: End of protocol treatment, which is planned to last for two years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo259
Bicalutamide360

[back to top]

Second PSA Recurrence (12-year Rates Reported)

Second PSA recurrence (SPSAR) rates (i.e. first PSA failure on study) were estimated by the cumulative incidence method, with failure defined as the first occurrence of one of the following events: 1. Increase in PSA following protocol treatment according to the following criteria met during protocol treatment: If PSA dropped to undetectable level (<0.2 ng/ml) during protocol treatment (PT) then failure = increase after PT to >= 0.5 ng/ml ; If PSA decreased to a detectable level (≥ 0.2 ng/ml) during PT, then failure = increase PT of >= 0.3 ng/ml above the lowest detectable level; If PSA did not decrease during PT then failure = increase in PSA after PT of >= 0.5 ng/ml above entry PSA level. 2. The start of salvage hormone therapy. Patients alive without SPSAR at time of analysis were censored. Death without SPSAR was treated as a competing risk. Four-year follow-up was required of all patients, but twelve-year rates were reported. Patients are followed until death. (NCT00002874)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to 12 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo67.9
Bicalutamide44.0

[back to top]

Third PSA Recurrence (12-year Rates Reported)

Third PSA recurrence rates (i.e. second PSA failure on study) were estimated by the cumulative incidence method, with failure defined as PSA value of 0.5ng/ml or higher or any disease progression after starting salvage hormone therapy. Patients alive without third PSA recurrence at time of analysis were censored. Death without third PSA recurrence was treated as a competing risk. Four-year follow-up was required of all patients, but twelve-year rates were reported. Patients are followed until death. (NCT00002874)
Timeframe: From start of salvage hormone therapy to 12 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo80.7
Bicalutamide84.2

[back to top]

"Number of Wives of the Participants Having Better Than or Equal to a Good Quality of Life"

To measure the differences in quality of life between wives of participants in the androgen ablation condition compared to wives of patients in the control condition by using quality of life assessments. The following questionnaires were completed in the clinic setting and used to assess Health related (HRQoL): Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36), University of California-Los Angeles Sexual Function Scale (UCLA-SFS), and Southwest Oncology Group Treatment-Specific Symptoms Scale (SWOG-TSSS). The SF-36 was analysed using a composite score for each of physical health and mental health. SF-36, UCLA-SFS, SWOGTSSS were combined to classify participants' quality of life. (NCT00003645)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A19
Arm B24

[back to top]

Quality of Life for Participants

To determine the impact of one year of total androgen ablation on quality of life mentally, physically and sexual function. The following questionnaires were completed by patients in the clinic setting and used to assess HRQoL: Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) and University of California-Los Angeles Sexual Function Scale (UCLA-SFS). To score the SF-36, scales are standardized with a scoring algorithm or by the SF-36v2 scoring software to obtain a score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better quality of life. (NCT00003645)
Timeframe: 1 year

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
MentalPhysicalSexual Function
Arm I - Leuprolide + Flutamide55495
Arm II - No Treatment544928

[back to top]

Rate of Biochemical Failure at 5 Years

Biochemical failure uses the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) definition of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) rises on three consecutive occasions, with biochemical failure date being midway between the last non-rising PSA and the first rise in PSA. Time to biochemical failure is defined as time from randomization to biochemical failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death (competing risk). Biochemical failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. (NCT00004054)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 5 years. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 13.3 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Hormones and RT48.0
Hormones and RT Plus Chemotherapy47.9

[back to top]

Overall Survival (5-year Rate Reported)

Survival time is defined as time from randomization to date of death from any cause and is estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients last known to be alive are censored at date of last contact. This analysis was planned to occur when all patients had been potentially followed for 5 years. (NCT00004054)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the date of death or last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 5 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Hormones and RT84.9
Hormones and RT Plus Chemotherapy87.2

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival Rate at 5 Years

Disease-free survival (DFS) was measured from the date of randomization to the date of documentation of progression (local, distant, biochemical failure), death, or last follow-up (censored). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate DFS rates. (NCT00004054)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 5 years. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 13.3 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Hormones and RT39.1
Hormones and RT Plus Chemotherapy42.9

[back to top]

Rate of Local Progression at 5 Years

Local progression is defined as documented clinical local and/or regional progression. Time to local progression is defined as time from randomization to local progression, last known follow-up (censored), or death (competing risk). Local progression rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. (NCT00004054)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 5 years. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 13.3 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Hormones and RT5.8
Hormones and RT Plus Chemotherapy4.1

[back to top]

Rate of Distant Metastasis at Five Years

Distant metastasis (DM) is defined as documented metastatic disease. Time to distant metastasis is defined as time from randomization to distant metastatic disease, last known follow-up (censored), or death (competing risk). Distant metastasis rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. (NCT00004054)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 5 years. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 13.3 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Hormones and RT10.4
Hormones and RT Plus Chemotherapy8.3

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Measured from date of randomization to date of death from any cause. Patient known to be alive are censored at date of last contact. (NCT00004124)
Timeframe: at 10 Years

Interventionpercentage of probability of survival (Number)
Arm I: Bicalutamide + Goserelin87
Arm II: Mitoxantrone + Prednisone + Bivalutamid + Goserelin86

[back to top]

Compare Qualitative and Quantitative Toxicities of These Regimens in These Patients

Number of patients with adverse events that are related to study drug (NCT00004124)
Timeframe: Up to 22 months from registration

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Abdominal pain/crampingAbscessAlkaline phosphatase increaseAllergic reactionAllergic rhinitisAlopeciaAnal incontinenceAnemiaAnorexiaAnxiety/agitationApneaArrhythmia, NOSArthralgiaArthritisAtaxia (incoordination)Bilirubin increaseBlurred visionBone painBruisingCPK increaseCardiac ischemia/infarctionCardiovascular-otherCataractCerebrovascular ischemiaChest pain,not cardio or pleurConduction abnormality/blockConfusionConjunctivitisConstipation/bowel obstructionCoughCreatinine increaseCushingoid appearanceDehydrationDepressionDiarrhea without colostomyDizziness/light headednessDry eyeDry skinDysmenorrheaDyspepsia/heartburnDyspneaDysuriaEar-otherEdemaEndocrine-otherEpistaxisErectile impotenceEryth/rash/eruption/desq, NOSEsophagitis/dysphagiaEye-otherFatigue/malaise/lethargyFebrile neutropeniaFeminization of maleFever without neutropeniaFever, NOSFlatulenceFlu-like symptoms-otherFlushingGGT increaseGI Mucositis, NOSGI-otherGU-otherGastritisGastritis/ulcer, NOSGlaucomaGynecomastiaHeadacheHematologic-otherHematuriaHemolysisHemoptysisHemorrhage-otherHiccoughsHot flashesHypercalcemiaHypercholesterolemiaHyperglycemiaHyperkalemiaHypermagnesemiaHypernatremiaHypertensionHypertriglyceridemiaHypoalbuminemiaHypocalcemiaHypoglycemiaHypokalemiaHypomagnesemiaHyponatremiaHypotensionHypothyroidismHypoxiaIncontinenceInfection w/o 3-4 neutropeniaInfection with 3-4 neutropeniaInfection, unk ANCInner ear-hearing lossInsomniaInvol. movement/restlessnessJoint,muscle,bone-otherLVEF decrease/CHFLeukopeniaLibido lossLocal injection site reactionLung-otherLymphopeniaMale infertilityMelena/ GI bleedingMemory lossMetabolic-otherMiddle ear-hearing loss/otitisMood/consciousness change, NOSMouth drynessMuscle weakness (not neuro)MyalgiaMyalgia/arthralgia, NOSMyocarditisNail changesNauseaNeuro-otherNeuropathic painNeutropenia/granulocytopeniaPRBC transfusionPain-otherPalpitationsPelvic painPericar. effusion/pericarditisPersonality/behavioral changePhlebitisPigmentation changes/yellowingPleural effusionsPneumonitis/infiltratesProctitisProteinuriaPruritusRT-GI mucositis, NOSRT-focal dermatitis, NOSRT-late bladder morbidityRT-late intestinal morbidityRT-painRash/desquamationRectal bleeding/hematocheziaRectal/perirectal painRespiratory infect w/o neutropRespiratory infection, unk ANCRigors/chillsSGOT (AST) increaseSGPT (ALT) increaseSalivary change, NOSSecond primarySeizuresSensory neuropathySexual/reproductive-otherSinus bradycardiaSkin-otherSpeech impairmentStomatitis/pharyngitisSupraventricular arrhythmiaSurgery-wound infectionSweatingSyncopeTaste disturbanceTearingThrombocytopeniaThrombosis/embolismTremorTroponin T (cTnT) increaseUrinary frequency/urgencyUrinary retentionUrinary tr infect w/ neutropUrinary tr infect w/o neutropUrinary tr infection, unk ANCUrine color changeUrticariaVentricular arrhythmiaVertigoVision,NOSVoice change/stridor/larynxVomitingWeakness (motor neuropathy)Weight gainWeight loss
Arm I: Bicalutamide + Goserelin19011129125275210431715319101051111605710700805533111072114040301810212580101225101292021403719001043945440003821108133208850137921101416311042015002105526104265011011219012000043130312146127117422200137201105001380103200861301333110010317912
Arm II: Mitoxantrone + Prednisone + Bivalutamid + Goserelin411115161312141416211641712063414215601901441173417868575715281444911256221462136357209636401020901010082113114442252784143806711112110471102429222783171331724932121131377451215720541239312761111153114123110106310578244226161571411149211293466355211017122444011651615129

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival

Measured from date of randomization to date of first observation of recurrence or death due to any cause. Patients without recurrence are censored at date of last contact. (NCT00004124)
Timeframe: at 10 Years

Interventionpercentage of probability of survival (Number)
Arm I: Bicalutamide + Goserelin72
Arm II: Mitoxantrone + Prednisone + Bivalutamid + Goserelin72

[back to top]

Disease-specific Survival (DSS) (10-year Rates Reported)

Disease-specific survival time is measured from date of randomization to death due to prostate cancer based on study chair review, with prostate-cancer death defined as (1) primary cause of death certified as due to prostate cancer, (2) complication of therapy, irrespective of disease status, (3) disease progression in the absence of any anti-tumor therapy, or (4) a 1.0 ng/ml-exceeding-rise in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level on at least two consecutive occasions that occurs during or after salvage androgen suppression therapy. Death due to other causes is considered a competing risk. All others are censored. DSS is estimated using the cumulative incidence method. Ten-year rate is reported. (NCT00005044)
Timeframe: From randomization to 10 years. (Patients are followed until death or study termination, whichever occurs first.)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
TAS x 8 Weeks95
TAS x 28 Weeks96

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) (10-year Rates Reported)

Survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death from any cause and is estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients last known to be alive are censored at the date of last contact. Ten-year rate is reported. (NCT00005044)
Timeframe: From randomization to 10 years. (Patients are followed until death or study termination, whichever occurs first.)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
TAS x 8 Weeks66
TAS x 28 Weeks67

[back to top]

Time to Second Biochemical Failure (SBF) (10-year Rates Reported)

Time to SBF measured from date of randomization to the date of PSA increase of ≥1.0 ng/mL (from the nadir PSA after completion of protocol-specified therapy) after salvage androgen suppression was started; competing risks LRP, DM, and death without SBF; all others are censored. SBF is estimated using the cumulative incidence method. Ten-year rates are reported. (NCT00005044)
Timeframe: From randomization to 10 years. (Patients are followed until death or study termination, whichever occurs first.)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
TAS x 8 Weeks10
TAS x 28 Weeks9

[back to top]

Clinical Patterns of Tumor Recurrence: Time to Locoregional Progression (LRP) and Time to Distant Metastasis (DM) (10 Year Rates Reported)

Time to distant metastasis measured from date of randomization to date of documented distant metastasis; competing risks are BF, LRP, and death without DM; all others are censored. Time to locoregional progression measured from date of randomization to date of documented local or regional progression; competing risks are BF [protocol definition- first of (1) the midway date between the last non-rising PSA and the first rising PSA of three consecutive rises or (2) the date of the initiation of salvage hormone therapy], DM, and death without LRP; all others are censored. LRP and DM are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. Ten -year rates are reported. (NCT00005044)
Timeframe: From randomization to 10 years. (Patients are followed until death or study termination, whichever occurs first.)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Locoregional progressionDistant metastasis
TAS x 28 Weeks46
TAS x 8 Weeks66

[back to top]

Time to First Biochemical Failure (BF) (10-year Rates Reported)

"Protocol definition: Time to BF measured from date of randomization to first of (1) the midway date between the last non-rising PSA and the first rising PSA of three consecutive rises or (2) the date of the initiation of salvage hormone therapy; competing risks are LRP, DM, and death without BF; all others are censored.~Phoenix definition: Time to BF measured from date of randomization to first of (1) the date of documented rise of 2 ng/ml above the post-treatment(RT end date) nadir or (2) the date of the initiation of salvage hormone therapy; competing risks are LRP, DM, and death without BF; all others are censored. For both definitions BF is estimated using the cumulative incidence method. Ten year rates reported." (NCT00005044)
Timeframe: From randomization to 10 years. (Patients are followed until death or study termination, whichever occurs first.)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Protocol definitionPhoenix definition
TAS x 28 Weeks5927
TAS x 8 Weeks5627

[back to top]

Treatment-induced Morbidity (Highest Grade Toxicity Reported Per Patient)

Acute drug therapy and radiation (<= 90 days from start of RT) toxicity was graded using the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) v.2.0 criteria; late toxicity was graded using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring schema. Grade refers to the severity of the toxicity. The CTC v2.0 assigns Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each toxicity based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild toxicity, Grade 2 Moderate toxicity, Grade 3 Severe toxicity, Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling toxicity, Grade 5 Death related to toxicity. The highest grade acute and late toxicity was determined for each patient. (NCT00005044)
Timeframe: From randomization to 10 years. (Patients are followed until death or study termination, whichever occurs first.)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Acute RT and Hormone Toxicity: Grade 1Acute RT and Hormone Toxicity: Grade 2Acute RT and Hormone Toxicity: Grade 3Acute RT and Hormone Toxicity: Grade 4Acute RT and Hormone Toxicity: Grade 5Late RT Toxicity: Grade 1Late RT Toxicity: Grade 2Late RT Toxicity: Grade 3Late RT Toxicity: Grade 4Late RT Toxicity: Grade 5
TAS x 28 Weeks19.549.825.70.1032.922.58.00.30
TAS x 8 Weeks30.841.616.10034.020.59.70.10

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival (DFS) (10-year Rates Reported)

Disease-free survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of disease progression or death from any cause and is estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients last known to be alive are censored at the date of last contact. Ten-year rate is reported. (NCT00005044)
Timeframe: From randomization to 10 years. (Patients are followed until death or study termination, whichever occurs first.)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
TAS x 8 Weeks24
TAS x 28 Weeks23

[back to top] [back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Measured from time of registration to time of first documentation of progression determined from the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, clinical criteria, or symptomatic deterioration. PSA progression is defined as a 25% increase greater than baseline. If the patient's PSA level had decrease during the study, a 25% increase from the nadir PSA level, with absolute value of >=5 ng/mL is considered progression. CLinical progress is defined as the appearance of any new lesion at any site or death without documented progression. Symptomatic deterioration is defined as a global deterioration of the health status requiring discontinuation of treatment without objective evidence of progression. (NCT00028769)
Timeframe: 0-5 years (assessed every 3 months if no progression when the chemotherapy had been finished. Once off chemotherapy, assessed every 3 months until progression)

Interventionmonths (Median)
CAD + Chemo13

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival is defined from the date of registration to date of death from any cause (NCT00028769)
Timeframe: 0-5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
CAD + Chemo38

[back to top]

Change in Average Testicular Volume

Testicular volume of both testes was measured using either ultrasound or an orchidometer. Testicular volume was measured at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. The change in testicular volume from baseline was calculated for the left and right testicle as well as the average across both testes by subtracting the baseline volume from the volumes at 6 and 12 months within each patient. (NCT00094328)
Timeframe: Assessed after 6 and 12 months of treatment

InterventionmL (Mean)
After 6 months treatmentAfter 12 months treatment
Open Label Bicalutamide With Anastrozole1.462.69

[back to top]

Change in Predicted Adult Height (PAH)

Radiographs are used to assess the bone age, the change in predicted adult height (PAH) is calculated from the bone age using the Bayley and Pinneau Method. The change in PAH is be calculated by subtracting the PAH at baseline from the PAH at 12 months. (NCT00094328)
Timeframe: Assessed after 12 months treatment

Interventioncm (Mean)
Open Label Bicalutamide With Anastrozole6.21

[back to top]

Change in Growth Rate (SD Units)

Change in growth rate after 6 months of treatment relative to the growth rate during the ≥6 months pre-study period. (NCT00094328)
Timeframe: Assessed after 6 months treatment

InterventionSD units (Mean)
Open Label Bicalutamide With Anastrozole-0.14

[back to top]

Change in Growth Rate (SD Units)

Change in growth rate after 12 months relative to the growth rate during the ≥6 month pre-study period, calculated after adjustment for the chronological age of the patient (expressed as a standard deviation [SD] score). (NCT00094328)
Timeframe: Assessed after 12 months treatment

InterventionSD units (Mean)
Open Label Bicalutamide With Anastrozole-0.07

[back to top]

Change in Growth Rate (cm/Year)

Change in growth rate after 6 months of treatment relative to the growth rate during the ≥6 months pre-study period. (NCT00094328)
Timeframe: Assessed after 6 months treatment

Interventioncm/year (Mean)
Open Label Bicalutamide With Anastrozole-0.70

[back to top]

Change in Growth Rate (cm/Year)

Change in growth rate after 12 months relative to the growth rate during the ≥6 month pre-study period, based on raw height data (cm/year). (NCT00094328)
Timeframe: Assessed after 12 months treatment

Interventioncm/year (Mean)
Open Label Bicalutamide With Anastrozole-1.62

[back to top]

Change in Bone Age Maturation Rate (cm/Year)

Radiographs were used to assess the bone age at ≥6 months pre-study, baseline, 6 and 12 months. The rate of change in bone age at baseline was calculated from a radiograph taken at least 6 months prior to study enrolment. The change in bone maturation after 6 months of treatment was calculated relative to the rate of change in bone age during the ≥ 6 months pre-study period. (NCT00094328)
Timeframe: Assessed after 6 and 12 months treatment

Interventioncm/year (Mean)
After 6 months treatmentAfter 12 months treatment
Open Label Bicalutamide With Anastrozole-2.03-2.29

[back to top]

Change in Bone Age to Chronological Age Ratio

Change in bone age to chronological age ratio after 6 and 12 months treatment relative to the baseline ratio for all patients. (NCT00094328)
Timeframe: Assessed after 6 and 12 months of treatment

InterventionRatio (Mean)
After 6 months treatmentAfter 12 months treatment
Open Label Bicalutamide With Anastrozole-0.09-0.24

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Height Between 5th and 95th Percentile

The number of patients whose height lies between the 5th and 95th percentiles (using the percentile tables on the WHO database) for chronological age at the 12 month assessment. (NCT00094328)
Timeframe: Assessed after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of treatment

InterventionParticipants (Number)
After 3 months treatmentAfter 6 months treatmentAfter 9 months treatmentAfter 12 months treatment
Open Label Bicalutamide With Anastrozole3333

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With PSA Response

"PSA response is defined as complete biochemical response or partial response.~Complete Response:~A PSA < 0.2 ng/mL confirmed by a repeat PSA one month later is considered a complete biochemical response for patients with prior radical prostatectomy. A PSA < 1 ng/mL on three separate occasions taken at least one month apart is considered a complete biochemical response in patients with radiation therapy only.~Partial Response:~A reduction in PSA by > 50% from baseline, confirmed by repeat PSA 1 month later." (NCT00108732)
Timeframe: Assessed monthly during the first 24 weeks and then every 3 months for a maximum total of 24 months

InterventionProportion of patients (Number)
Vaccinia/Fowlpox/GM-CSF0

[back to top]

The Difference Between PSA Slopes Before and After Treatment

PSA slopes were assessed by multiple PSA values obtained prior to registration and during treatment. Only patients who completed at least 3 months of treatment were included in this analysis. The PSA slopes were calculated by a piecewise linear model using the three or four PSA values obtained prior to registration and PSA measurements obtained every 4 weeks for the first six months of treatment. Natural log transformed PSA levels were used in this analysis, and the difference between PSA slopes before and after treatment was calculated. (NCT00108732)
Timeframe: Assessed monthly during the first 24 weeks and then every 3 months for a maximum total of 24 months

Interventionlog PSA/month (Median)
Vaccinia/Fowlpox/GM-CSF-0.04

[back to top]

Difference Between Day 4 PSA Level and Day 15 PSA Level

PSA level was assessed on Day 4 and Day 15 of cycle 1, and a comparison between the two measurements was done. (NCT00108732)
Timeframe: Assessed at day 4 and day 15 of cycle 1

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Vaccinia/Fowlpox/GM-CSF0.45

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Free of PSA Progression at 6 Months (Prior to the Start of Androgen Ablation)

"For patients who achieved a > 50% decline in PSA, an increase in PSA value by 50% over the nadir, confirmed by a second PSA two weeks later is considered progressive disease. The PSA rise must be at least 5 ng/mL or back to pretreatment baseline, whichever is greater.~Changes in PSA below 5 ng/mL will not be considered assessable for progression.~For patients whose PSA has not decreased by 50%, an increase in PSA value > 50% of baseline (on trial) or nadir PSA, whichever is lower, confirmed by a repeat PSA two weeks later is considered progressive disease. The PSA must have risen by at least 5 ng/mL." (NCT00108732)
Timeframe: Assessed at 6 months

InterventionProportion of patients (Number)
Vaccinia/Fowlpox/GM-CSF0.625

[back to top]

Percent of Participants With Undetectable Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response

Percent of participants who had undetectable PSA at 3 months on the initially assigned treatment arm (prior to crossing over). (NCT00170157)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Androgen Ablative (AA) Therapy + MDX-01055
Androgen Ablative (AA) Then AA Therapy + MDX-01039

[back to top]

Number of Participants Progression-free at 18 Months

PSA progression is defined as a rise in PSA to >4.0 ng/mL demonstrated twice in measurements taken two weeks apart. (NCT00170157)
Timeframe: 18 months from the start of AA therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Entire Study Population0

[back to top]

To Determine the Effects of Different Modes of Androgen Deprivation on Serum DHT

Serum DHT (NCT00298155)
Timeframe: After 12 weeks of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation

Interventionng/dL (Mean)
Group 14.2
Group 23.6
Group 35.7

[back to top]

Prostate Tissue DHT

Tissue dihydrotesterone (DHT) (NCT00298155)
Timeframe: After 12 weeks of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation

Interventionng/g (Mean)
Group 10.03
Group 20.06
Group 30.03

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose of Samarium-153

"To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Samarium as adjuvant to combined hormonal therapy (HT) and external beam radiation therapy (RT).~Dose levels:~Dose I: 0.25 mCi/kg IV Dose II: 0.5 mCi/kg IV Dose III: 0.75 mCi/kg IV Dose IV: 1.0 mCi/kg IV Dose V: 1.5 mCi/kg IV Dose VI: 2.0 mCi/kg IV~Dose-limiting toxicity will be defined as Grade 3 hematologic toxicity per NCI Common Toxicity Criteria. The maximally tolerated dose (MTD) will then be the last dose studied or the previous dose, based on clinical judgment of the degree of toxicity seen at the last dose." (NCT00328614)
Timeframe: 5 months (1 month HT, administration of drug, 4 months HT and RT)

InterventionmCi/kg (Number)
Samarium-1532.0

[back to top]

Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Failures

Baseline + Post-radiation PSA levels at three month intervals for initial two years then every 6 months thereafter. Participants with a rising PSA and no evidence of local or distant recurrence considered PSA failures. (NCT00388804)
Timeframe: 3 months up to 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
RT Group 10
RT Group 2 + Hormone Therapy0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Evaluated for Toxicity

Toxicity measured by CTCAE v3.0 (NCT00468715)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bicalutamide28

[back to top]

Time to Disease Progression

Time to disease progression (PD) is defined as the interval of time between the date of the start of treatment and the date of PD. PD is defined as prostate specific antigen (PSA) progression from Baseline (PSA value is 25% and at least 2 nanograms per milliliter [ng/mL] above Baseline, confirmed by a second PSA value); PSA progression from nadir, without a 50% decrease from Baseline (PSA value is 25% and at least 2 ng/mL above nadir, confirmed by a second PSA value); PSA progression from nadir, with a 50% or more decrease from Baseline (PSA value is 50% and at least 2 ng/mL above nadir, confirmed by a second PSA value); metastatic disease (radiographic evidence of metastatic disease); death due to prostate cancer; or the receipt of post-Baseline rescue medication. PSA confirmation was not required if no subsequent PSA values were available. Participants who did not experience an event were censored at the date of the latest follow-up information. (NCT00470834)
Timeframe: Interval of time between the date of the start of treatment and the date of disease progression (up to Study Month 42)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Bicalutamide 50 mg/Placebo376.9
Bicalutamide 50 mg/Dutasteride 3.5 mg433.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total PSA at Months 6, 12, 18, 21, and 42

Change from Baseline in total PSA was measured at each scheduled post-baseline visit using a general linear model with effects for treatment and Baseline total PSA. Analysis was done using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach, in which missing post-Baseline values were imputed with earlier non-missing values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. (NCT00470834)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 6, 12, 18, 21, and 42

,
InterventionNanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) (Median)
Month 6, n=62, 61Month 12, n=62, 61Month 18, n=62, 61Month 21, n=26, 30Month 42, n=26, 30
Bicalutamide 50 mg/Dutasteride 3.5 mg-2.2-2.1-1.7-1.80.6
Bicalutamide 50 mg/Placebo-2.0-1.7-1.2-2.1-0.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Metastatic Disease

Metastatic disease is that evidenced by a radiographic assessment. The time of metastatic disease was the date of radiographic evidence. (NCT00470834)
Timeframe: Interval of time between the date of the start of treatment and the date of radiographic evidence of metastatic disease (up to Study Month 42)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Months 1-18, n=65, 62Months 19-42, n=26, 30Overall (Months 1-42), n=65, 62
Bicalutamide 50 mg/Dutasteride 3.5 mg516
Bicalutamide 50 mg/Placebo819

[back to top]

Number of Participants With PSA Response

PSA response is defined as a 50% or greater decrease in PSA from Baseline, confirmed by a second PSA measurement. The time of this response was the date of the first PSA measurement that showed a 50% or greater decrease from the Baseline PSA measurement. PSA confirmation was not required if no subsequent PSA values were available. (NCT00470834)
Timeframe: Time from Baseline PSA measurement until the first PSA measurement with a 50% or greater reduction in PSA values (up to Study Month 42)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Months 1-18, n=65, 62Months 19-42, n=4, 7Overall (Months 1-42), n=65, 62
Bicalutamide 50 mg/Dutasteride 3.5 mg38038
Bicalutamide 50 mg/Placebo37037

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure

Time to treatment failure is defined as the interval of time between the date of the start of treatment and the date of treatment failure. Treatment failure is defined as PSA progression from Baseline (PSA value is 25% and at least 2 ng/mL above Baseline, confirmed by a second PSA value); metastatic disease (radiographic evidence of metastatic disease); death due to prostate cancer; or receipt of post-baseline rescue medications. PSA confirmation was not required if no subsequent PSA values were available. Participants who did not experience an event were censored at the date of the latest follow-up information. (NCT00470834)
Timeframe: Interval of time between the date of the start of treatment and the date of treatment failure (up to Study Month 42)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Bicalutamide 50 mg/Placebo368.4
Bicalutamide 50 mg/Dutasteride 3.5 mg457.5

[back to top]

PSA Response Rate

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (defined as a confirmed > / = 50% decline (minimum 5ng/ml) in PSA from baseline maintained for >4 weeks, and without other evidence of disease progression documented at time of confirmatory values). (NCT00486642)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A - Pazopanib1
Arm B - Pazopanib + Bicalutamide2

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

"PFS is defined as the time from treatment initiation to disease progression or death from any cause, whichever came first.~Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions" (NCT00486642)
Timeframe: From time of treatment initiation to disease progression or death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A - Pazopanib7.3
Arm B - Pazopanib + Bicalutamide11.3

[back to top]

Objective Tumor Response Rate as Assessed by RECIST Criteria

RECIST PR defined as - At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. (NCT00486642)
Timeframe: Time from start of treatment to time criteria are met for disease progression or death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 5 years

Interventionpatient (Number)
Arm A - Pazopanib0
Arm B - Pazopanib + Bicalutamide1

[back to top]

Toxicity

Patients who came off treatment due to toxicity. (NCT00486642)
Timeframe: Assessed up to 5 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm A (Pazopanib)3
Arm B (Pazopanib + Bicalutamide)6

[back to top]

Median Duration of PSA-Response

"Definition of PSA response: >= 50% fall (minimum 5 ng/ml) in PSA from baseline maintained for >4 weeks, and without other evidence of disease progression documented at time of confirmatory values.~PSA response duration will commence on the date of the first >=50% decline in PSA. The response duration ends when PSA progression criteria are met with the second increasing PSA value.~PSA progression in PSA responders: rise in PSA of 50% (minimum 5ng/ml) above nadir value and confirmed by a second increasing value at least 1 week later." (NCT00486642)
Timeframe: From time PSA response criteria are met until time PSA progression criteria are met or death from any cause, whichever came first, up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A - Pazopanib8.3
Arm B - Pazopanib + Bicalutamide13.1

[back to top]

Time to Disease Progression

Earliest date on which disease progression was determined by any of the methods listed: PSA progression, objective disease progression (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] criteria) or cancer-related symptomatic progression. (NCT00486642)
Timeframe: Time from start of treatment to time criteria are met for disease progression or death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A - Pazopanib7.3
Arm B - Pazopanib + Bicalutamide11.3

[back to top]

Stable Disease Rate as Assessed by RECIST Criteria

RECIST Stable defined as - Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. (NCT00486642)
Timeframe: Measured from the start of the treatment until the criteria for progression are met or death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A - Pazopanib2
Arm B - Pazopanib + Bicalutamide8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Trial Outcome Index (TOI) Score at EOT

Physical well-being, functional well-being, and prostate cancer concerns sub-scales of the FACT-P questionnaire were combined to calculate TOI. Total TOI score ranges from 0 to 104, with higher scores representing a better quality of life with fewer symptoms. (NCT00514917)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT (up to Month 18)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=206, 206)Change at EOT (n=187, 187)
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+Bicalutamide82.1-5.4
Leuprolide+Bicalutamide80.4-3.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

TEAE: any adverse event (AE) that occurred or worsened during the on-treatment period, which was the period from first administration of study treatment until 30 days after last administration of study treatment. AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious AE: an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly, or medically important. Drug-related AEs were any untoward medical occurrences attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 3.0 Grade 3 (severe) and Grade 4 (life threatening/disabling) TEAEs were also reported. (NCT00514917)
Timeframe: From first administration of study treatment until 30 days after the last administration of study treatment

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any TEAEAny Serious AEAny TEAE Resulting in DeathAny TEAE Leading to any Treatment DiscontinuationAny Grade 3-4 TEAEDocetaxel Related TEAELeuprolide Related TEAEBicalutamide Related TEAEAny Treatment Related TEAEAny Grade 3-4 Serious TEAEAny TEAE Leading to Interruption of any Treatment
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+Bicalutamide1884903594183109521844377
Leuprolide+Bicalutamide163201122NA13674136141

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Index Score at EOT

MAF scale consists of 16-items to measure 4 dimensions of fatigue during past week: severity (Item 1-2), distress (Item 3), degree of interference in activities of daily living (Item 4-14), and timing (Item 15-16). Item 1-14 are scored on a numeric rating scale from 1 to 10, where higher score indicate more severity/distress/interference. Item 15-16 had multiple choice responses (4 responses each). Scale Index was calculated using Item 1-15, in following steps: 1) Item 15 score converted to 1-10 scale by multiplying the score with 2.5; 2) Average score was calculated from Item 4-14; 3) Finally scale index was calculated by adding Items 1, 2, 3 scores with average score from step 2 and converted score of Item 15 from step 1. Total MAF scale index score ranges 1 (no fatigue) to 50 (severe fatigue). (NCT00514917)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT (up to Month 18)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=168, 171)Change at EOT (n=127, 144)
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+Bicalutamide16.44.0
Leuprolide+Bicalutamide16.62.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Total Score at End of Treatment (EOT)

FACT-P is a 39-item participant questionnaire which assesses physical well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items), emotional well-being (6 items), functional well-being (7 items), and additional prostate cancer specific concerns (12 items). All items are scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The total FACT-P score ranges from 0-156, with higher scores representing a better quality of life with fewer symptoms. A score of 156 represents the best outcome. (NCT00514917)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT (up to Month 18)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=206, 205)Change at EOT (n=186, 184)
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+Bicalutamide121.4-4.9
Leuprolide+Bicalutamide119.6-3.4

[back to top]

Cancer-Specific Survival: Number of Participants Who Died (Cancer-Specific)

The cancer-specific survival was the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to prostate cancer. Cancer-specific survival was to be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. However, the analysis was not performed due to insufficient number of events. Reported is the number of participants who died from prostate cancer. (NCT00514917)
Timeframe: Randomization until death due to prostate cancer, assessed up to Month 60

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+Bicalutamide2
Leuprolide+Bicalutamide3

[back to top]

Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population

PFS was the time from randomization to the date of first documented prostate specific antigen (PSA) progression, or radiographic progression, or death due to prostate cancer in the absence of previous documentation of disease progression, whichever occurred first. PSA progression was determined as: a) During treatment period: a 50 percent (%) increase from baseline, which was confirmed by a second value; b) During follow-up: detectable PSA (defined as PSA greater than or equal to 0.05 nanogram per millimeter [ng/mL]), which was confirmed by consecutive observation (not less than 2 weeks apart). Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00514917)
Timeframe: Randomization until PSA progression or radiographic progression or death due to prostate cancer, assessed up to Month 60

Interventionmonths (Median)
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+Bicalutamide25.4
Leuprolide+Bicalutamide23.3

[back to top]

Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Testosterone Specific Evaluable Population

PFS was the time from randomization to the date of first documented PSA progression, or radiographic progression, or death due to prostate cancer in the absence of previous documentation of disease progression, whichever occurred first. Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00514917)
Timeframe: Randomization until PSA progression or radiographic progression or death due to prostate cancer, assessed up to Month 60

Interventionmonths (Median)
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+Bicalutamide25.7
Leuprolide+Bicalutamide24.7

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS): Number of Participants Who Died (All Cause)

The OS was the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. OS was to be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. However, the analysis was not performed due to insufficient number of events. Reported is the number of participants who died from any cause. (NCT00514917)
Timeframe: Randomization until death due to any cause, assessed up to Month 60

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+Bicalutamide4
Leuprolide+Bicalutamide11

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Month 36 in ITT Population

PFS rate at Month 36 was defined as probability of being progression-free at Month 36. PFS rate was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00514917)
Timeframe: Month 36

Interventionpercent chance of being progression-free (Number)
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+Bicalutamide15.5
Leuprolide+Bicalutamide8.6

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Month 36 in Testosterone Specific Evaluable Population

PFS rate at Month 36 was defined as probability of being progression-free at Month 36. PFS rate was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00514917)
Timeframe: Month 36

Interventionpercent chance of being progression-free (Number)
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+Bicalutamide15.8
Leuprolide+Bicalutamide9.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Erectile Function Domain of International Index of Erectile Function (EF-IIEF) Total Score at EOT

EF-IIEF is a 6-item erectile function domain of IIEF. It consists of Question 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 15 of IIEF questionnaire. 5 questions are scored from 0 (no activity) to 5 (very high activity) and 1 question is scored from 1 (very low activity) to 5 (very high activity). Total EF-IIEF score ranges from 1 to 30, where higher score indicates high activity. (NCT00514917)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT (up to Month 18)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=201, 205)Change at EOT (n=180, 186)
Docetaxel+Leuprolide+Bicalutamide6.4-3.1
Leuprolide+Bicalutamide6.8-3.3

[back to top]

Overall Survival (3-year Rate)

Time from registration to date of death (failure) or last follow-up (censored). Three-year rate and 95% confidence interval were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00528866)
Timeframe: Analysis occurs after all patients have been on study for at least 3 years. (Patients are followed from registration to death or study termination whichever occurs first.)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Androgen Suppression + RT + Docetaxel98.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants Free From Progression at 3 Years

Failure was defined as PSA ≥ 0.4 ng/mL after the end of radiation therapy confirmed by a second higher PSA, non-protocol hormones, local-regional progression, distant metastasis, or death, within 3 years after study registration. Freedom from progression (FFP) rate under null hypothesis was 50%; under alternative hypothesis ≥ 70%. Per Fleming's multiple testing procedure with 3 stages, 69 patients (76 allowing for 10% ineligible) were required for 90% power and type I error 0.025. If ≥ 44 of 69 patients had a FFP event, we would reject 50% FFP rate in favor of ≥ 70%. Analysis was out of 74 patients (not 69), so ≥ 44 was revised to ≥ 46. (NCT00528866)
Timeframe: From registration to 3 years.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Androgen Suppression + RT + Docetaxel54

[back to top]

Prostate Cancer Death (3-year Rate)

Time from registration to date of distant metastasis (failure), death (competing risk), or last follow-up (censored). Three-year failure rate and 95% confidence interval were estimated by the cumulative incidence method. (NCT00528866)
Timeframe: Analysis occurs after all patients have been on study for at least 3 years. (Patients are followed from registration to death or study termination whichever occurs first.)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Androgen Suppression + RT + Docetaxel0

[back to top]

Non-prostate Cancer Death (3-year Rate)

Time from registration to date of death due to other causes (failure), death due to prostate cancer (competing risk), or last follow-up (censored).Three-year failure rate and 95% confidence interval were estimated by the cumulative incidence method. (NCT00528866)
Timeframe: Analysis occurs after all patients have been on study for at least 3 years. (Patients are followed from registration to death or study termination whichever occurs first.)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Androgen Suppression + RT + Docetaxel1.4

[back to top]

"Number of Patients With Acute Adverse Events (Based on CTCAE, v3.0)"

The number of patients with at least one grade 3 or higher adverse event (AE) from start of treatment to 90 days after the planned end of treatment (21 days after last docetaxel dose). Adverse events are graded using CTCAE v3.0. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE v3.0 assigns Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild AE, Grade 2 Moderate AE, Grade 3 Severe AE, Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling AE, Grade 5 Death related to AE. (NCT00528866)
Timeframe: From start of treatment to 90 days after the planned end of treatment (21 days after last docetaxel dose). Analysis occurs at the time of the primary analysis. (Patients are followed until death or study termination whichever occurs first.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Androgen Suppression + RT + Docetaxel57

[back to top]

"Time to Late Grade 3+ Adverse Events (Based on CTCAE, v3.0)"

Two-year rate shown (cumulative incidence method). Adverse events are graded using CTCAE v3.0. Time of first late adverse event occurrence of the Grade 3+ adverse event between 91 days and 730 days from the completion of treatment (3 weeks after the last planned docetaxel dose) calculated. Adverse events are graded using CTCAE v3.0. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE v3.0 assigns Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild AE, Grade 2 Moderate AE, Grade 3 Severe AE, Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling AE, Grade 5 Death related to AE. (NCT00528866)
Timeframe: From 91 to 730 days after the planned end of treatment (21 days after last docetaxel dose). Analysis occurs at the time of the primary analysis. (Patients are followed from registration to death or study termination whichever occurs first.)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Androgen Suppression + RT + Docetaxel8.1

[back to top]

Distant Metastasis (3-year Rate)

Time from registration to date of distant metastasis (failure), death (competing risk), or last follow-up (censored). Three-year failure rate and 95% confidence interval were estimated by the cumulative incidence method. (NCT00528866)
Timeframe: Analysis occurs after all patients have been on study for at least 3 years. (Patients are followed from registration to death or study termination whichever occurs first.)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Androgen Suppression + RT + Docetaxel6.8

[back to top]

Local-regional Progression (3 Year Rate)

Time from registration to date of local progression (failure), death (competing risk), or last follow-up (censored). Three-year failure rate and 95% confidence interval were estimated by the cumulative incidence method. (NCT00528866)
Timeframe: Analysis occurs after all patients have been on study for at least 3 years. (Patients are followed from registration to death or study termination whichever occurs first.)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Androgen Suppression + RT + Docetaxel0

[back to top]

Time to Biochemical (PSA) Failure (3-year Rate)

Failure is defined as PSA ≥ 0.4 ng/mL confirmed by a second higher PSA or initiation of non-protocol hormones. Death is considered a competing risk. Three-year failure rate and 95% confidence interval were estimated by the cumulative incidence method. (NCT00528866)
Timeframe: Analysis occurs after all patients have been on study for at least 3 years. (Patients are followed from registration to death or study termination whichever occurs first.)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Androgen Suppression + RT + Docetaxel25.7

[back to top]

CR Without ADT in Patients With Metastases Limited to Pelvic Lymph Nodes.

Number of patients remaining in complete remission without androgen deprivation therapy in patients with metastases limited to pelvic lymph nodes. (NCT00544830)
Timeframe: after 36 weeks of LHRH therapy.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Androgen Therapy, Radiation Therapy)4

[back to top]

Follow-up of the 8 Patients With Metastases Limited to Pelvic Lymph Nodes.

Length of follow-up of the 8 patients with metastases limited to pelvic lymph nodes, months. Patients are followed on day one of each of three 12-week periods. After completion of therapy, patients are followed every four weeks until PSA relapse, up to 46.4 months. (NCT00544830)
Timeframe: Patients are followed on day one of each of three 12-week periods. After completion of therapy, patients are followed every four weeks until PSA relapse, up to 46.4 months.

Interventionmonth (Median)
Treatment (Androgen Therapy, Radiation Therapy)14.7

[back to top]

Length of Follow-up

Length of follow-up in weeks to off-study date. Patients are treated for 36 weeks (+/- 2 weeks) with androgen deprivation therapy. Patients are evaluated for disease on day 1 of each of three 12-week cycles. After the last cycle of anti-androgen therapy, patients are assessed every four weeks until PSA relapse occurs, up to 264.8 weeks (61.4 months; 5.1 years). Patients will remain off-treatment until they meet the criteria for re-treatment with androgen deprivation therapy, whereupon they will be taken off of the protocol. After patients are taken off protocol, we will do a chart review for long-term outcomes. (NCT00544830)
Timeframe: Patients are evaluated for disease on day 1 of each of three 12-week cycles. After the last cycle of anti-androgen therapy, patients are assessed every four weeks until PSA relapse occurs, up to 61.4 months

Interventionweek (Median)
Treatment (Androgen Therapy, Radiation Therapy)111.4

[back to top]

Patients Who Achieved PSA Nadir of < 0.2 at 36 Weeks.

Number of Patients who achieved PSA nadir of < 0.2 at 36 weeks. (NCT00544830)
Timeframe: During the time period between on-study PSA to off-study PSA, up to 36 weeks.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Androgen Therapy, Radiation Therapy)25

[back to top]

Time to Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Relapse

Time from the date of the last dose of bicalutamide or the last day of radiation therapy (whichever comes later) until the date criteria are met for PSA relapse. PSA relapse after completion of initial 36 weeks of androgen deprivation therapy is defined as an increase in PSA value to above pre-therapy level, or to > 10, whichever is smaller. For example, a patient with pre-treatment PSA level of 40 will resume androgen deprivation therapy when PSA level is > 10, while a patient with pre-treatment PSA level of 3 will resume androgen deprivation therapy when PSA level is > 3. (NCT00544830)
Timeframe: End-of-therapy until PSA reached pre-treatment level or 10 (whichever was lower)

Interventionmonth (Median)
Treatment (Androgen Therapy, Radiation Therapy)16.5

[back to top]

Rate of Treatment Failure (no PSA Threshold Below 4 ng/dl, or no PSA Below Baseline Level Before LHRH Treatment).

Treatment failures: Count and percent of patients NOT reaching PSA concentration in serum either below 4 ng/dl or below baseline before LHRH treatment . (NCT00544830)
Timeframe: Off-treatment PSA measurement date minus on-study PSA measurement date, up to 36 weeks.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Androgen Therapy, Radiation Therapy)15

[back to top]

Count of Patients Remaining Off of Therapy

Patients who remained off of therapy, in remission, out of the number of patients with metastases limited to pelvic lymph nodes. (NCT00544830)
Timeframe: after 36 week LHRH treatment window.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Androgen Therapy, Radiation Therapy)7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to Prostate Cancer (Cause-specific Mortality)

Cause-specific mortality (failure) is defined as death due to prostate cancer or complications of protocol treatment (centrally reviewed), or death following disease progression (clinical or biochemical) in the absence of or after the initiation of any salvage therapy. [Biochemical progression is indicated by any rise in PSA.] Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of failure, death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Failure rates for data summary are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, with 5-year rates provided here. Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of failure times, reported in the statistical analysis section, use cause-specific hazard rates for which deaths are censored. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but the data monitoring committee decided to release results after the third interim analysis. (NCT00567580)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PBRT Alone2.7
PBRT + STAD1.1
PLNRT + PBRT + STAD0.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Free From Progression (FFP) at 5 Years

Progression is defined as the first occurrence of the following events: biochemical failure by the Phoenix definition (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥ 2 ng/ml over the nadir PSA), clinical failure (local, regional or distant), or death from any cause. The initiation of second salvage therapy before progression was a protocol violation and resulted in censoring. Progression time is defined as time from randomization to the date of progression, second salvage therapy (censored), or last known follow-up (censored). Freedom from progression rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but results were reported early. See Limitations and Caveats section. (NCT00567580)
Timeframe: From randomization to five years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PBRT Alone70.3
PBRT + STAD81.3
PLNRT + PBRT + STAD87.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Free From Hormone-refractory Disease (Castrate-resistant Disease)

Hormone-refractory disease (failure) is defined as three rises in PSA after the start of second salvage androgen deprivation therapy. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of failure, death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Failure rates for data summary are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, with 5-year rates provided here. Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of failure times, reported in the statistical analysis section, use cause-specific hazard rates for which deaths are censored. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but the data monitoring committee decided to release results after the third interim analysis. (NCT00567580)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PBRT Alone2.9
PBRT + STAD2.4
PLNRT + PBRT + STAD1.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Alive (Overall Mortality)

Survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Pairwise comparisons of the overall distributions of failure times are reported in statistical analysis section, with five-year rates reported here. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but the data monitoring committee decided to release results after the third interim analysis. (NCT00567580)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PBRT Alone93.9
PBRT + STAD96.1
PLNRT + PBRT + STAD95.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Distant Metastasis

Distant metastasis (failure) is defined as the occurrence of distant metastasis determined by imaging. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of failure, death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Failure rates for data summary are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, with 5-year rates provided here. Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of failure times, reported in the statistical analysis section, use cause-specific hazard rates for which deaths are censored. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but the data monitoring committee decided to release results after the third interim analysis. (NCT00567580)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PBRT Alone8.3
PBRT + STAD5.9
PLNRT + PBRT + STAD4.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 2+ and 3+ Adverse Events ≤ 90 Days of the Completion of Radiotherapy (RT)

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0) grades adverse event severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data. Pairwise comparisons of Arm 2 vs Arm 1 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 2 are reported in the statistical analysis. (NCT00567580)
Timeframe: From randomization to 90 days after completion of radiotherapy (approximately 7-8 weeks).

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Grade 2+Grade 3+
PBRT + STAD36.38.7
PBRT Alone18.84.4
PLNRT + PBRT + STAD43.612.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Local Failure

Local failure is defined as first occurrence of local clinical progression. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of failure, death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Failure rates for data summary are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, with 5-year rates provided here. Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of failure times, reported in the statistical analysis section, use cause-specific hazard rates for which deaths are censored. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but the data monitoring committee decided to release results after the third interim analysis. (NCT00567580)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PBRT Alone3.1
PBRT + STAD1.2
PLNRT + PBRT + STAD0.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Secondary Biochemical Failure (Alternative Biochemical Failure)

Secondary biochemical (failure) is defined as either of two occurrences: 1. For detectable post-baseline PSA values (≥ 0.1), the first occurrence of a PSA value that is both ≥ 0.4 and a second rise above nadir; 2.The start of second salvage therapy. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of failure, death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Failure rates for data summary are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, with 5-year rates provided here. Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of failure times, reported in the statistical analysis section, use cause-specific hazard rates for which deaths are censored. The study was designed for the final analysis to occur after all participants had been on study for at least 5 years, but results were reported early. See Limitations and Caveats section. (NCT00567580)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PBRT Alone35.7
PBRT + STAD22.3
PLNRT + PBRT + STAD14.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Late Grade 2+ and 3+ Adverse Events > 90 Days From the Completion of Radiotherapy (RT)

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0) grades adverse event severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Late adverse events (AE) are defined as occurring > 90 days from the completion of RT. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first late grade 2 or grade 3 adverse event, death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Failure rates for data summary are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, with 5-year rates provided here. Pairwise comparisons of the distributions of failure times between Arm 2 and Arm 1 and between Arm 3 and Arm 2, reported in the statistical analysis section, use cause-specific hazard rates for which deaths are censored. (NCT00567580)
Timeframe: AE: from 91 days after completion of RT (approximately 7-8 weeks) to last follow-up. Vital status: from randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.5 years.

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Grade 2+Grade 3+
PBRT + STAD54.811.4
PBRT Alone52.810.3
PLNRT + PBRT + STAD58.614.4

[back to top]

Response

Complete Response: Normalization of the PSA (< or = to 4.0 for patients with castrate metastatic disease, or < 0.5 for patients with a rising PSA) that is maintained on 3 successive evaluations a minimum of 2 weeks apart. Partial Response: Decrease in PSA value by > or = to 50% from baseline value (without normalization) for 3 successive evaluations a minimum of 2 weeks apart. Stabilization: Patients who do not meet the criteria for PR or PROG for at least 90 days will be considered stable. (NCT00586898)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)Stable Disease (SD)
All Participants2243

[back to top]

Levels of DHEA-S in Blood From Radical Prostatectomy Specimens

(NCT00589472)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionmcg/dL (Median)
Treatment (Antihormone Therapy and Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy)90

[back to top]

Levels of Testosterone in Blood From Radical Prostatectomy Specimens

(NCT00589472)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionng/dL (Median)
Treatment (Antihormone Therapy and Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy)319

[back to top]

Levels of PSA in Blood From Radical Prostatectomy Specimens

(NCT00589472)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Treatment (Antihormone Therapy and Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy)9.44

[back to top]

Gleason Score

A Gleason score is the sum of two numbers. Pathologist determines where the cancer is most prominent and assigns the primary grade, the secondary grade is assigned based on where the cancer is next most prominent. A score from one to five is assigned for each area based on how aggressive the tumor appears. A tumor with cell that appear close to normal is assigned a low Gleason score (six or below). A tumor with cells that appear clearly different from those of a normal prostate is assigned a high Gleason score (seven or above). A system of grading prostate cancer tissue based on how it looks under a microscope. Gleason scores range from 2 to 10 and indicate how likely it is that a tumor will spread. A low Gleason score means the cancer tissue is similar to normal prostate tissue and the tumor is less likely to spread; a high Gleason score means the cancer tissue is very different from normal and the tumor is more likely to spread. (NCT00589472)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Treatment (Antihormone Therapy and Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy)8

[back to top]

Levels of DHEA in Blood From Radical Prostatectomy Specimens

(NCT00589472)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionng/dL (Median)
Treatment (Antihormone Therapy and Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy)256

[back to top]

Levels of DHT in Blood From Radical Prostatectomy Specimens

(NCT00589472)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionng/dL (Median)
Treatment (Antihormone Therapy and Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy)24

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP estimated with Kaplan-Meier methods is defined as the time from treatment start to when PSA progression criteria is first met, or the date of measurable or non-measurable disease progression (PD). Absent progression, patients are censored at the date of the last PSA measurement. PSA progression is a ≥25% increase over baseline or nadir PSA, whichever is lowest with a minimum increase of 5 ng/mL. If PSA declines ≥50%, PSA progression is a ≥50% PSA increase above nadir with a minimum increase of 5 ng/mL or back to pretreatment baseline, whichever is lowest. PSA progression requires 2 week confirmation. Per RECIST, PD is at least a 20% increase in sum LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or appearance of new lesions. Non-measurable PD is defined as a worsening bone scan, as indicated by the appearance of two or more new lesions, the appearance of new non-bony metastases or a requirement for radiation therapy. (NCT00630344)
Timeframe: PSA was measured monthly and measurable disease on imaging assessed every 2 cycles in first 8 weeks and every 3 cycles thereafter. In this study cohort, patients were followed on treatment up to approximately 1 year.

Interventionweeks (Median)
RAD001 + Bicalutamide8.7

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

"Overall response rate is the percentage of patients achieving response taking into consideration measurable disease, bone metastases, and PSA. PSA declines in the absence of both measurable disease and the appearance of new bone lesions or a response in measurable disease without an increase in PSA or the appearance of new bone lesions. Patients with stable disease (SD) lasting at least 6 months will also be considered responders.~Per RECIST guidelines, for target lesions, complete response (CR) is complete disappearance of all target lesions and partial response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. CR or PR confirmation is required within 4 weeks. Per modified PSAWG2 criteria (Scher H, Halabi S, Tannock I et al. JCO 2008) PSA response is defined as PSA decline ≥ 50% from baseline confirmed by a second measurement at least 4 weeks later." (NCT00630344)
Timeframe: PSA was measured monthly and measurable disease on imaging assessed every 2 cycles in first 8 weeks and every 3 cycles thereafter. In this study cohort, patients were followed on treatment up to approximately 1 year.

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
RAD-001 + Bicalutamide6

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Time to PSA Progression (TTP)

For prostatectomy patients: at least two serial rising PSA from treatment nadir and PSA > 0.2 ng/mL. For patient receiving radiation therapy alone as primary local therapy, at least two serial rising PSA from treatment nadir and PSA > 2.0 ng/mL. Any new site of metastatic disease on imagining would be considered progression regardless of PSA value (NCT00658697)
Timeframe: participants were followed for the duration of the study, an average of 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Docetaxel, Bevacizumab, and ADT27.5

[back to top]

Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Progression at 1 Year After Completing Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT)

"For prostatectomy patients: at least two serial rising PSA from treatment nadir and PSA > 0.2 ng/mL.~For patient receiving radiation therapy alone as primary local therapy, at least two serial rising PSA from treatment nadir and PSA >2.0 ng/mL.~Any new site of metastatic disease on imagining would be considered progression regardless of PSA value Clinical assessments (Vitals, Physical Exam, Performance Status, PSA and testosterone) were performed every 3 months starting at completion of hormone therapy until PSA progression." (NCT00658697)
Timeframe: participants were followed for the duration of the study, an average of 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants with data (Number)
Docetaxel, Bevacizumab, and ADT98

[back to top]

Toxicity

Treatment related adverse events were graded based on CTCAE v. 3.0. (NCT00658697)
Timeframe: Assessed each cycle throughout treatment form time of first dose to 30 days post-treatment, up to 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade 3 treatment related AEGrade 4 treatment related AEs
Docetaxel, Bevacizumab, and ADT165

[back to top]

Testosterone Recovery

Testosterone recovery was defined as >100 or within DFCI institute normal range (240-950) at one year after the completion of ADT (NCT00658697)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants with data (Number)
Testosterone >=100 ng/mLTestosterone >=240 ng/mL
Docetaxel, Bevacizumab, and ADT8335

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With PSA Responses at One Year After the Completion of ADT

The PSA response was defined using two cut-offs: PSA <0.2 ng/mL or PSA <0.01 ng/mL at the one year after completion of ADT. (NCT00658697)
Timeframe: 1 year + 3 month off last ADT injection

Interventionpercentage of participants with data (Number)
PSA <0.2 ng/mLPSA <=0.01 ng/mL
Docetaxel, Bevacizumab, and ADT4425

[back to top]

PSA Response Rate

"To investigate the effect of vandetanib on the PSA response rate. PSA response rate defined by the number of participants with a PSA decrease relative to baseline of at least 50%.~A minimum decrease of 2 ng/mL in absolute value and a confirmation on at least 2 consecutive occasions (at least 4 weeks apart) were requested." (NCT00659438)
Timeframe: 4 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Vandetanib3
Placebo5

[back to top]

Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Progression Free Rate at 4 Months

"To assess the effect of vandetanib on biological progression free rate based on PSA level (assessable set).~PSA progression free rate defined as the number of participants with :~After decline from baseline: a 25% increase above the nadir~No decline from baseline: a 25% increase above the baseline (min. increase of 2 ng/mL)" (NCT00659438)
Timeframe: 4 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Vandetanib8
Placebo7

[back to top]

Progression Rate From the Radionuclide Bone Scanning

To describe the effect of vandetanib on progression rate from the radionuclide bone scanning in a sub-group of patients who had a bone scan within 3 to 6 months after 1st treatment dose. Number of participants with at least 2 new lesions on the radionuclide bone scan compared to baseline assessment were counted for calculation of progression rate. (NCT00659438)
Timeframe: 4 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Vandetanib3
Placebo4

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) at 4 Months (Instead of Time to PSA Progression)

Due to the difficulties to assess biological progression date when clinical progression has occurred first, and because of the non-assessment of the clinical progression after treatment discontinuation, Time to PSA progression was not evaluated. PFS was evaluated instead, whether biological or clinical progression. (NCT00659438)
Timeframe: 4 months

Interventionweeks (Median)
Vandetanib12.2
Placebo12.8

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

To investigate the effect of vandetanib on overall survival. Patients alive at the time of the statistical analysis were censored at the time they were last known to be alive. Due to censored data, median overall survival in the placebo group cannot be calculated. OS defined as the number of participants who were alive. (NCT00659438)
Timeframe: End of study (July 2011)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Vandetanib32
Placebo35

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Overall PSA < 4.0 ng/mL

(NCT00666666)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
AT101 (R-(-)-Gossypol Acetic Acid)60

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL But < 4.0 ng/mL

(NCT00666666)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
AT101 (R-(-)-Gossypol Acetic Acid)18

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Undetectable Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) (< 0.2 ng/mL) at End of 7 Cycles

(NCT00666666)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
AT101 (R-(-)-Gossypol Acetic Acid)22

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Who Can Safely Tolerate and Complete Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy, Radiation Therapy and Docetaxel After a Radical Prostatectomy

Defined as percentage of patients that complete full dose of Radiation Therapy (RT) (NCT00669162)
Timeframe: 8 Months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
RT, Docetaxel, Hormonal Therapy26

[back to top]

The Number of Participants With an Increase in PSA Doubling Time

(NCT00702923)
Timeframe: Up to 18 months after last dose of study agent

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
immediate post-treatment period (6-12 months)12-18 months after treatment
CP-675,206 3mg/kg02
CP-675,206 6mg/kg01

[back to top]

Number of Participants With PSA Recurrence.

PSA recurrence is defined as a minimum PSA value of greater or equal to 1.0ng/ml occurring within one year after the last treatment with CP-675,206, with a confirmatory PSA blood teat performed at least 2 weeks later. (NCT00702923)
Timeframe: one year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
CP-675,206 3mg/kg6
CP-675,206 6mg/kg5

[back to top]

The Number of Participants Who Developed Cancer Antigen-specific Immune Responses

(NCT00702923)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months after treatment with study agent

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
one or more prostate-associated antigensantibodies specific for PSA
CP-675,206 3mg/kg62
CP-675,206 6mg/kg51

[back to top]

Analysis of Cytokines and Angiogenic Factors in Plasma/Serum

Analysis of cytokines and angiogenic factors in plasma/serum at baseline and at 6 months (end of treatment). (NCT00776594)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpg/ml (Median)
Leptin Level in Patients Treated With ADT+Bev13755
Leptin in Patients Treated With ADT Alone10179

[back to top]

Cardiovascular Safety Including Measurement of Blood Pressure During Treatment Period (6 Months).

The number of patients who developed hypertension (greater that 150 systolic or greater than 90 diastolic) during treatment period. (NCT00776594)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Group 148
Group 213

[back to top]

Relapse-free Survival

To identify a difference in relapse-free survival in men treated with short course ADT (6 months) versus short course ADT plus bevacizumab. (NCT00776594)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Group 113
Group 210

[back to top]

Number of Participants With PSA <0.2 ng/ml at Six Months

Number of participants with a PSA <0.2 ng/ml at six months (upon completion of treatment). (NCT00776594)
Timeframe: Six months (at completion of treatment)

InterventionNumber of participants (Number)
Group 151
Group 227

[back to top]

PSA Response Rate

The PSA response rate was defined as a 30% reduction in the PSA level from baseline. PSA Working Group consensus criteria combined with radiographic studies were used to determine the proportion of patients with PSA decline. (NCT00814788)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bicalutamide + Everolimus18

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions (NCT00814788)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bicalutamide + Everolimus9.4

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00814788)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bicalutamide + Everolimus28

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Vital Signs and Body Weight

This outcome measure included incidence of markedly abnormal changes in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), pulse, and body weight. The table presents the number of participants with normal baseline and at least one post-baseline markedly abnormal value. (NCT00831233)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks of treatment

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Diastolic blood pressure <=50 and decrease >=15Diastolic blood pressure >=105 and increase >=15Systolic blood pressure <=90 and decrease >=20Systolic blood pressure >=180 and increase >=20Heart rate <=50 and decrease >=15Heart rate >=120 and increase >=15Body weight decrease of >=7 percentBody weight increase of >=7 percent
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg00000011
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)00000000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Testosterone <=0.5 Nanograms/Milliliter at Each Visit

(NCT00831233)
Timeframe: After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg262527
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)121212

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Concentration at Each Visit

(NCT00831233)
Timeframe: After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline

,
Interventionpercentage (Median)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-85.72-89.2-93.87
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-93.44-97.26-97.78

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Safety Laboratory Variables

The figures present the number of participants who had abnormal (defined as above upper limit of normal range (ULN)) levels of safety laboratory variables. Only the laboratory variables that had at least on participant with one abnormal value are presented, many more variables were included in the trial. (NCT00831233)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks of treatment

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
B-Haematocrit (Ratio) <=0.37B-Platelet count (10^9/L) <=75S-Calcium (mmol/L) <=1.8S-Potassium (mmol/L) >=5.8S-Urea nitrogen (mmol/L) >=10.7
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg51101
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)10012

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 12

The IPSS is a tool commonly used to assess the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and to monitor the progress of the disease once treatment has been initiated. The participant completes a questionnaire containing 7 questions regarding incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining, and nocturia. Each question is assigned a score of 0-5. The total score is then classified according to the following scale: 0 to 7 = mildly symptomatic; 8 to 19 = moderately symptomatic; and 20 to 35 = severely symptomatic. (NCT00831233)
Timeframe: After treatment of 12 weeks compared to Baseline

Interventionscore on scale (Mean)
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-11.2
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-7.69

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total IPSS at Weeks 4 and 8

The IPSS is a tool commonly used to assess the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and to monitor the progress of the disease once treatment has been initiated. The participant completes a questionnaire containing 7 questions regarding incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining, and nocturia. Each question is assigned a score of 0-5. The total score is then classified according to the following scale: 0 to 7 = mildly symptomatic; 8 to 19 = moderately symptomatic; and 20 to 35 = severely symptomatic. (NCT00831233)
Timeframe: After treatment of 4 and 8 weeks compared to Baseline

,
Interventionscore on scale (Mean)
Week 4Week 8
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-7.31-9.46
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-4.62-8.08

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Residual Volume (Vresidual) at Each Visit

Uroflowmetry was used to quantify the residual volume (Vresidual; mL) (NCT00831233)
Timeframe: After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline

,
InterventionmL (Mean)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-36.2-43.8-50.7
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-19.8-19.6-13.4

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Maximum Urine Flow (Qmax) at Each Visit

Uroflowmetry was used to quantify the maximum urine flow (Qmax; mL/sec) (NCT00831233)
Timeframe: After treatment of 4, 8 and 12 weeks compared to Baseline

,
InterventionmL/sec (Mean)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg3.634.743.62
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)3.553.522.07

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Prostate Size Based on Trans Rectal Ultra Sound (TRUS) at Week 12

TRUS is a method of measuring the size of the prostate. (NCT00831233)
Timeframe: After 12 weeks treatment compared to Baseline

InterventionmL (Mean)
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-22.4
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-13.4

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Oestradiol Levels During the Study

(NCT00833248)
Timeframe: After treatment of 4, 8, and 12 weeks compared to Baseline

,
Interventionnanogram per deciliter (Median)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-1.55-1.6-1.55
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-1.65-1.65-1.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels During the Study

(NCT00833248)
Timeframe: After treatment of 4, 8, and 12 weeks compared to Baseline

,
Interventionnanograms per milliliter (Median)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-6.3-7.95-8.35
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-5.9-8.8-9.05

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Vital Signs and Body Weight

This outcome measure included incidence of markedly abnormal changes in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), pulse, and body weight. The table presents the number of participants with normal baseline and at least one post-baseline markedly abnormal value. (NCT00833248)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks of treatment

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Diastolic blood pressure <=50 and decrease >=15Diastolic blood pressure >=105 and increase >=15Systolic blood pressure <=90 and decrease >=20Systolic blood pressure >=180 and increase >=20Heart rate <=50 and decrease >=15Heart rate >=120 and increase >=15Body weight decrease of >=7 percentBody weight increase of >=7 percent
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg03011035
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)00011020

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Safety Laboratory Variables

The figures present the number of participants who had abnormal (defined as above upper limit of normal range (ULN)) levels of safety laboratory variables. Only the laboratory variables that had at least one percentage of participants in either group with abnormal value are presented, more variables were included in the study. (NCT00833248)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks of treatment

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
B-Haematocrit (Ratio) <=0.37B-Haemoglobin (g/L) <=115S-Alanine aminotransferase (IU/L) >3 x ULNS-Potassium (mmol/L) >=5.8S-Urea nitrogen (mmol/L) >=10.7
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg3141410
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)81113

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 4, 8, and 12

The IPSS is a tool commonly used to assess the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and to monitor the progress of the disease once treatment has been initiated. The participant completes a questionnaire containing 7 questions regarding incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining, and nocturia. Each question is assigned a score of 0-5. The total score is then classified according to the following scale: 0 to 7 = mildly symptomatic; 8 to 19 = moderately symptomatic; and 20 to 35 = severely symptomatic. (NCT00833248)
Timeframe: After treatment of 4, 8, and 12 weeks compared to Baseline

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-0.21-1.53-1.71
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)0.360.020.11

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Serum Testosterone Levels During the Study

(NCT00833248)
Timeframe: After treatment of 4, 8, and 12 weeks compared to Baseline

,
Interventionnanograms per milliliter (Median)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-3.8-3.77-3.81
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-4.22-4.26-4.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Prostate Size Based on Trans Rectal Ultra Sound (TRUS) at Week 12 (Full Analysis Set)

TRUS is a method of measuring the size of the prostate. (NCT00833248)
Timeframe: After treatment of 12 weeks compared to Baseline

Interventionmilliliter (Mean)
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-36.0
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-35.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Prostate Size Based on Trans Rectal Ultra Sound (TRUS) at Week 12 (Per Protocol Analysis Set)

TRUS is a method of measuring the size of the prostate. (NCT00833248)
Timeframe: After treatment of 12 weeks compared to Baseline

Interventionmilliliter (Mean)
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-36.2
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-35.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Free of Progression and Without Symptomatic Deterioration

"measured by PSA and /or metastases progression criteria by body CT following RECIST criteria 1.1 and/or bones scan following the appearance of at least 2 new bone metastases and confirmation of 2 additional bone metastasis on a subsequent bone scan 6-8 weeks later and/or clinical progression.~Only participants who completed two or more treatment cycles were assessed for this outcome measure." (NCT00878436)
Timeframe: 9 months

Interventionpercentage of Participants (Number)
LBH 40mg24
LBH 20mg9

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Free of Progression and Without Symptomatic Deterioration

"measured by PSA and /or metastases progression criteria by body CT following RECIST criteria 1.1 and/or bones scan following the appearance of at least 2 new bone metastases and confirmation of 2 additional bone metastasis on a subsequent bone scan 6-8 weeks later and/or clinical progression.~Only participants who completed two or more treatment cycles were assessed for this outcome measure." (NCT00878436)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
LBH 40mg42
LBH 20mg19

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 4, 8, and 12

The IPSS is a tool commonly used to assess the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and to monitor the progress of the disease once treatment has been initiated. The participant completes a questionnaire containing 7 questions regarding incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining, and nocturia. Each question is assigned a score of 0-5. The total score is then classified according to the following scale: 0 to 7 = mildly symptomatic; 8 to 19 = moderately symptomatic; and 20 to 35 = severely symptomatic. (NCT00884273)
Timeframe: After treatment of 4, 8, and 12 weeks compared to Baseline

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-2.09-3.55-4.39
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-1.36-3.13-2.74

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Vital Signs and Body Weight

This outcome measure included incidence of markedly abnormal changes in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), pulse, and body weight. The table presents the number of participants with normal baseline and at least one post-baseline markedly abnormal value. (NCT00884273)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks of treatment

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Diastolic blood pressure <=50 and decrease >=15Diastolic blood pressure >=105 and increase >=15Systolic blood pressure <=90 and decrease >=20Systolic blood pressure >=180 and increase >=20Heart rate <=50 and decrease >=15Heart rate >=120 and increase >=15Body weight decrease of >=7 percentBody weight increase of >=7 percent
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg00021002
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)01040053

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Safety Laboratory Variables

The figures present the number of participants who had abnormal (defined as above upper limit of normal range (ULN)) levels of safety laboratory variables. Only the laboratory variables that had at least one percentage of participants in either group with abnormal value are presented, more variables were included in the study. (NCT00884273)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks of treatment

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
B-Haematocrit (Ratio) <=0.37B-Haemoglobin (g/L) <=115B-Red blood cell count (10^12/L) <=3.5B-White blood cell count (10^9/L) <=2.8S-Alanine aminotransferase (IU/L) >3xULNS-Alkaline phosphatase (IU/L) >3xULN+25% increaseS-Aspartate aminotransferase (IU/L) >3xULNS-Cholesterol (mmol/L) >=8.0S-Glutamyltransferase (IU/L) >3xULNS-Potassium (mmol/L) >=5.8S-Urea nitrogen (mmol/L) >=10.7
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg1321310021310
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)161012120033

[back to top]

Change in Serum Testosterone Levels During the Study

(NCT00884273)
Timeframe: At 4, 8, and 12 weeks compared to baseline.

,
Interventionnanograms per milliliter (Median)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-3.91-3.97-4.09
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-4.17-4.24-4.23

[back to top]

Change in Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels During the Study

(NCT00884273)
Timeframe: At 4, 8, and 12 weeks compared to baseline.

,
Interventionnanograms per milliliter (Median)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-20.25-22.5-25.15
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-12.10-14.6-13.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Prostate Size Based on TRUS at Week 4 and 8

TRUS is a method of measuring the size of the prostate. (NCT00884273)
Timeframe: After treatment of 4 and 8 weeks compared to Baseline

,
Interventionmilliliter (Mean)
Week 4Week 8
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-19.2-33.1
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-21.2-33.2

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Burden of Urinary Symptoms Based on the Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index (BPHII)

The Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index (BPHII) is a self-administered questionnaire to measure how much urinary problems affect various domains of health. The higher value the worse are the urinary problems. The minimum possible total value is 0 and the maximum possible total value is 16. (NCT00884273)
Timeframe: After treatment of 4, 8, and 12 weeks compared to Baseline

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-0.78-0.88-1.28
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-0.70-1.09-1.16

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Prostate Size Based on Trans Rectal Ultra Sound (TRUS) at Week 12 (Per Protocol Analysis Set)

TRUS is a method of measuring the size of the prostate. (NCT00884273)
Timeframe: After treatment of 12 weeks compared to Baseline

Interventionmilliliter (Mean)
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-37.3
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-39.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Prostate Size Based on Trans Rectal Ultra Sound (TRUS) at Week 12 (Full Analysis Set)

TRUS is a method of measuring the size of the prostate. (NCT00884273)
Timeframe: After treatment of 12 weeks compared to Baseline

Interventionmilliliter (Mean)
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg-37.2
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)-39.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Distant Metastasis

"Distant metastasis (failure) is defined as metastatic disease documented by any method. If diagnosed on diagnostic imaging prompted by biochemical failure, then the event date will be the date of biochemical progression.~Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (competing risk), or death without failure (censored). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported." (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone3.1
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Bowel Domain Score

The EPIC assesses disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and it's therapies and consists of four summary domains (bowel, urinary, sexual, and hormonal), each ranging from 0-100, with higher scores representing better health-related quality of life. Change is calculated as time point value - baseline value, such that a positive change indicates improvement. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: Last week of RT (approximately 9 and 17 weeks from start of protocol treatment for Arm 1 and 2, respectively), then 6 months, 1 year and 5 years from end of RT.

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
End of RTSix months post-RTOne year post-RTFive years post-RT
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone-9.7-2.6-4.0-2.7
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation-10.5-3.8-5.2-2.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Local Recurrence

Local recurrence (failure) is defined as clinical (palpable) suspicion of local recurrence [this date is used] confirmed by biopsy. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone2.6
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation0.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Late Grade 3+ Adverse Events

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0) grades adverse event severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data. Late adverse events are defined as occurring more than 30 days after the end of radiation therapy. Failure is defined as grade 3 or higher late adverse event. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone12.8
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation15.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Acute Adverse Events

Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data. Acute adverse events are defined as occuring within 30 days of completion of radiation therapy. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone152
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation504

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Alive (Overall Survival)

Overall survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Overall survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone90.0
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation91.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Dead Due to Cause Other Than Prostate Cancer (Non-Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality)

Non-prostate cancer specific mortality is defined as a death without evidence of prostate cancer or a complication from treatment. . Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone9.1
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation9.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Dead Due to Prostate Cancer (Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality)

Prostate cancer specific mortality (failure) is defined as death due to prostate cancer or a complication from treatment. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone0.90
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Failed (Freedom From Failure)

Failure is defined as biochemical failure, local failure, or distant metastasis. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone14.8
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation7.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Failure

Biochemical failure is defined as an increase of at least 2 ng/ml above the nadir PSA. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone13.9
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation7.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Hormonal Domain Score

The EPIC assesses disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and it's therapies and consists of four summary domains (bowel, urinary, sexual, and hormonal), each ranging from 0-100, with higher scores representing better health-related quality of life. Change is calculated as time point value - baseline value, such that a positive change indicates improvement. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: Last week of RT (approximately 9 and 17 weeks from start of protocol treatment for Arm 1 and 2, respectively), then 6 months, 1 year and 5 years from end of RT.

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
End of RTSix months post-RTOne year post-RTFive years post-RT
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone-1.8-0.7-0.8-0.3
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation-18.4-13.7-7.8-2.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Sexual Domain Score

The EPIC assesses disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and it's therapies and consists of four summary domains (bowel, urinary, sexual, and hormonal), each ranging from 0-100, with higher scores representing better health-related quality of life. Change is calculated as time point value - baseline value, such that a positive change indicates improvement. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: Last week of RT (approximately 9 and 17 weeks from start of protocol treatment for Arm 1 and 2, respectively), then 6 months, 1 year and 5 years from end of RT.

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
End of RTSix months post-RTOne year post-RTFive years post-RT
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone-6.7-7.9-8.5-10.0
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation-22.6-19.9-16.6-9.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Urinary Domain Score

The EPIC assesses disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and it's therapies and consists of four summary domains (bowel, urinary, sexual, and hormonal), each ranging from 0-100, with higher scores representing better health-related quality of life. Change is calculated as time point value - baseline value, such that a positive change indicates improvement. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: Last week of RT (approximately 9 and 17 weeks from start of protocol treatment for Arm 1 and 2, respectively), then 6 months, 1 year and 5 years from end of RT.

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
End of RTSix months post-RTOne year post-RTFive years post-RT
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone (Arm 1)-12.4-0.1-1.9-0.4
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation (Arm 2)-13.8-3.6-1.60.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Domain Score

The PROMIS Fatigue short form 8a contains 8 questions, each with 5 responses ranging from 1 to 5, evaluating self-reported fatigue symptoms over the past 7 days. The total score is the sum of all questions which is then converted into a pro-rated T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10, with a possible range of 33.1 to 77.8. Higher scores indicate more fatigue. Change is defined as value at one year - value at baseline. Positive change from baseline indicates increased fatigue at one year. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: Last week of RT (approximately 9 and 17 weeks from start of protocol treatment for Arm 1 and 2, respectively), then 6 months, 1 year and 5 years from end of RT.

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
End of RTSix months post-RTOne year post_RTFive years post-RT
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone0.801.090.990.97
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation1.841.210.860.80

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Alive (Overall Survival) by Radiation Therapy Modality

Overall survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Overall survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
EBRTEBRT +LDR Brachytherapy BoostEBRT +HDR Brachytherapy Boost
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone89.410091.7
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation90.397.2100

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Receiving Salvage Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT)

Salvage (non-protocol) ADT administration is defined as the first administration of subsequent ADT (either LHRH agonist or anti-androgen) Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Salvage ADT rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of salvage ADT times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported. (NCT00936390)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone6.1
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation4.2

[back to top]

Reduction in Serum PSA

Proportion of subjects with > 50% drop in serum PSA as compared to baseline, assessed at 16 weeks (NCT01020305)
Timeframe: 12 weeks treatment, with primary outcome assessed at 16 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Temsirolimus + Bicalutamide0

[back to top]

Cmax (Maximum Observed Concentration of Drug Substance in Plasma)

maximum observed concentration of drug substance in plasma (NCT01044706)
Timeframe: 144 hour

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Bicalutamide 50 mg Tablet1253.60
Casodex® 50 mg Tablet1134.86

[back to top]

AUC0-144 (Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 144 Hour Post-dose)

AUC0-144 (area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to 144 hour post-dose) (NCT01044706)
Timeframe: 144 hour

Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Bicalutamide 50 mg Tablet114386.56
Casodex® 50 mg Tablet105377.55

[back to top]

Correlation of microRNA Measures With 28-week PSA Response

The Friedman test will be used to evaluate correlations between microRNA measures (CT) and 28-week PSA response. (NCT01120236)
Timeframe: Baseline to 28 weeks

,,
InterventionCycle Threshold (CT) (Median)
miR-141miR-200amiR-200bmiR-210miR-375
PSA Complete Response32.634.533.632.533.0
PSA Non-Responders31.533.832.632.329.5
PSA Partial Response32.033.833.632.132.6

[back to top]

Toxicity

Only adverse events that are possibly, probably or definitely related to study drug are reported. (NCT01120236)
Timeframe: Up to 28 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Alanine aminotransferase increasedAnemiaAnxietyAspartate aminotransferase increasedCognitive disturbanceDepressionErectile dysfunctionExostosisGlucose intoleranceHot flashesHypercalcemiaHyperglycemiaHypertensionHypertriglyceridemiaLeft ventricular systolic dysfunctionNauseaObesitySoft tissue infectionUrinary tract infectionUrinary tract obstructionVomiting
Arm I (Androgen Deprivation and Cixutumumab)110110110128211111101
Arm II (Androgen Deprivation Therapy)011001001100200010010

[back to top]

Correlation of microRNA Measures With Baseline Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) Counts

The Friedman test will be used to evaluate correlations between microRNA measures (CT) and Baseline CTCs. (NCT01120236)
Timeframe: Baseline

,,
InterventionCycle Threshold (CT) (Median)
miR-141miR-200amiR-200bmiR-210miR-375
CTC= 1-432.734.733.232.732.7
CTC= 5+31.933.033.632.130.2
CTC=033.034.433.432.532.8

[back to top]

Change in Level of Insulin

Serum samples and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC) for pharmacodynamic activity with potential biomarkers for IMC-A12 (insulin) obtained from optional blood specimens both before initiation of androgen deprivation therapy and twelve weeks after initiation of combined therapy. Results are reported as the difference between baseline and 12 weeks after start of therapy. (NCT01120236)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

InterventionulU/mL (Mean)
Arm I (Androgen Deprivation and Cixutumumab)0
Arm II (Androgen Deprivation Therapy)0

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Who do Not Achieve a Partial PSA Response

A partial PSA response is considered <= 4 ng/mL (NCT01120236)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm I (Androgen Deprivation and Cixutumumab)46
Arm II (Androgen Deprivation Therapy)56

[back to top]

Undetectable PSA Rate

Undetectable PSA rate (<= 0.2 ng/mL) after seven cycles (28 weeks) of protocol treatment (NCT01120236)
Timeframe: 7 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm I (Androgen Deprivation and Cixutumumab)42
Arm II (Androgen Deprivation Therapy)34

[back to top]

Change in Level of IGF-I, Free IGF-I and C-peptide

Serum samples and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC) for pharmacodynamic activity with potential biomarkers for IMC-A12 (including, but not limited to: IGF-I, free IGF-I and C-peptide) obtained from optional blood specimens both before initiation of androgen deprivation therapy and twelve weeks after initiation of combined therapy. Results are reported as the difference between baseline and 12 weeks after start of therapy. (NCT01120236)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
C-peptideIGF-IIGF-II
Arm I (Androgen Deprivation and Cixutumumab)-7010
Arm II (Androgen Deprivation Therapy)31-6

[back to top]

Change in Level of IGFBP2, IGFBP3 and Growth Hormone

Serum samples and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC) for pharmacodynamic activity with potential biomarkers for IMC-A12 (including, but not limited to: IGFBP2, IGFBP3 and Growth Hormone) obtained from optional blood specimens both before initiation of androgen deprivation therapy and twelve weeks after initiation of combined therapy. Results are reported as the difference between baseline and 12 weeks after start of therapy. (NCT01120236)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

,
Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
IGFBP-IIGFBP-IIIGH
Arm I (Androgen Deprivation and Cixutumumab)-9461389366
Arm II (Androgen Deprivation Therapy)-904291-25

[back to top]

Safety and Tolerability Assessed Using NCI CTCAE Version 4.0

Number of participants randomized to RO4929097 arm who experienced serious adverse events . (NCT01200810)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm I0
Arm II0

[back to top]

Pathologic Complete Response Was Assessed by Rigorous Pathological Examination by One of Two Pathologists

One of two pathologists (SR, EG), assigned the Gleason scores for each patient from pre-treatment prostate biopsies and assessed pathological staging on post- prostatectomy specimens. Staging including a description of all tumor foci within the gland, presence or absence of perineural invasion and/or lymphovascular invasion, presence of extraprostatic extension of tumor (including seminal vesicle invasion), and margin status. The pathologists reviewed the presence or absence of cancer in each prostate gland removed on the study patients. RECIST has to my knowledge not been used for pathological examination in neoadjuvant studies. 0 out of 28 participants acheived complete response. RECIST is not appropriate as cancer within the gland at the time of treatment is not measurable by RECIST. The primary outcome is a pathological complete response. (NCT01250717)
Timeframe: status post prostectomy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Docetaxel Followed by Radical Prostatectomy0

[back to top]

Time to PSA Nadir

Time to PSA nadir was defined as the time from randomization to the date that PSA nadir, the lowest PSA value achieved after randomization, was documented. This analysis was performed among patients whose PSA level decreased after randomization compared to baseline. (NCT01251861)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually up to 10 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A (Observation and Bicalutamide)7.7
Arm B (Akt Inhibitor MK2206 and Bicalutamide)6.7

[back to top]

Time to PSA Progression

"Time to PSA progression was defined as the time from randomization to PSA progression or date of last disease assessment showing progression-free. Development of clinical progression is also considered as an event.~For patients (pts) who achieved a ≥ 50% decline in PSA (confirmed on two consecutive determinations taken at least 4 weeks apart), progression is defined as an increase in PSA by 50% above baseline or nadir, whichever is lowest, confirmed by a 2nd PSA rise at least two weeks later. The PSA rise must be >= 5 ng/mL.~For pts with an undetectable PSA nadir (< 0.2 ng/mL confirmed on two consecutive determinations taken at least 4 weeks apart), progression is defined as PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL confirmed by a 2nd PSA rise at least 2 weeks later.~For pts whose PSA has not decreased by 50%, progression is defined as an increase in PSA of ≥ 50% of baseline or nadir PSA, whichever is lowest, confirmed by a repeat PSA at least 2 weeks later. The PSA must have risen by >= 5 ng/mL" (NCT01251861)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually up to 10 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A (Observation and Bicalutamide)25.8
Arm B (Akt Inhibitor MK2206 and Bicalutamide)24.3

[back to top]

The Association Between Gleason Score and PSA Response

"The association between PSA response (responder vs non-responder) and Gleason score (<7, 7 vs. >7) was evaluated by logistic regression with adjustment for treatment assignment.~Based on the biopsy sample, a Gleason grade is assigned to the most predominant pattern in the biopsy and a second Gleason grade is assigned to the second most predominant pattern. The two grades will then be added together to determine the Gleason score. Gleason scores range from 2-10. The higher the Gleason score, the more aggressive the cancer is likely to be." (NCT01251861)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually up to 10 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Gleason score <772271794Gleason score <772271795Gleason score =772271794Gleason score =772271795Gleason score >772271795Gleason score >772271794
ResponderNon-responder
Arm A (Observation and Bicalutamide)9
Arm B (Akt Inhibitor MK2206 and Bicalutamide)7
Arm A (Observation and Bicalutamide)1
Arm B (Akt Inhibitor MK2206 and Bicalutamide)3
Arm A (Observation and Bicalutamide)20
Arm B (Akt Inhibitor MK2206 and Bicalutamide)17
Arm A (Observation and Bicalutamide)5
Arm B (Akt Inhibitor MK2206 and Bicalutamide)6
Arm A (Observation and Bicalutamide)15
Arm B (Akt Inhibitor MK2206 and Bicalutamide)12
Arm A (Observation and Bicalutamide)4
Arm B (Akt Inhibitor MK2206 and Bicalutamide)9

[back to top]

The Association Between Prior Hormonal Therapy and PSA Response

The association between PSA response (responder vs non-responder) and prior hormonal therapy (yes vs. no) was evaluated by logistic regression with adjustment for treatment assignment. (NCT01251861)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually up to 10 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
No prior hormonal therapy72271794No prior hormonal therapy72271795Received prior hormonal therapy72271794Received prior hormonal therapy72271795
ResponderNon-responder
Arm A (Observation and Bicalutamide)28
Arm B (Akt Inhibitor MK2206 and Bicalutamide)19
Arm A (Observation and Bicalutamide)3
Arm B (Akt Inhibitor MK2206 and Bicalutamide)10
Arm A (Observation and Bicalutamide)16
Arm B (Akt Inhibitor MK2206 and Bicalutamide)17
Arm A (Observation and Bicalutamide)7
Arm B (Akt Inhibitor MK2206 and Bicalutamide)8

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With PSA Response

PSA complete response (CR) is defined as a PSA <0.2 ng/mL confirmed on two consecutive additional determinations taken at least 4 weeks apart. PSA partial response (PR) is defined as a reduction in PSA ≥ 50% from baseline without evidence of progression (confirmed on two consecutive additional determinations taken at least 4 weeks apart). Either CR or PR is considered as a PSA response. (NCT01251861)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually up to 10 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Arm A (Observation and Bicalutamide)0.815
Arm B (Akt Inhibitor MK2206 and Bicalutamide)0.667

[back to top]

Duration of PSA Response

Duration of PSA response was defined as the time from the date PSA criteria were met for complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), whichever status was recorded first, to the date of PSA progression. Patients without documented PSA progression were censored at the date of last disease assessment. Duration of PSA response is analyzed among responders (PSA CR or PR). (NCT01251861)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually up to 10 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A (Observation and Bicalutamide)20.6
Arm B (Akt Inhibitor MK2206 and Bicalutamide)25.3

[back to top]

PSA Slope After Starting Bicalutamide Treatment

PSA slopes were assessed by multiple PSA values after starting bicalutamide treatment. Linear regression was used to calculate PSA slope using natural log-transformed PSA values on the time of PSA measurements for each patient. (NCT01251861)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually up to 10 years

Interventionln(PSA)/month (Mean)
Arm A (Observation and Bicalutamide)-0.57
Arm B (Akt Inhibitor MK2206 and Bicalutamide)-0.60

[back to top]

PSA Slope Prior to Randomization

PSA slopes were assessed by multiple PSA values prior to randomization. Linear regression was used to calculate PSA slope using natural log-transformed PSA values on the time of PSA measurements for each patient. (NCT01251861)
Timeframe: Baseline (pre-randomization)

Interventionln(PSA)/month (Mean)
Arm A (Observation and Bicalutamide)0.20
Arm B (Akt Inhibitor MK2206 and Bicalutamide)0.20

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With PSA Decline > 85% at 44 Weeks

Proportion of patients with PSA decline > 85% at 44 weeks from baseline, defined as number of patients with PSA decline > 85% at 44 weeks from baseline divided by number of patients randomized. (NCT01251861)
Timeframe: 44 weeks

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Arm A (Observation and Bicalutamide)0.296
Arm B (Akt Inhibitor MK2206 and Bicalutamide)0.426

[back to top]

The Proportion of Patients With Undetectable PSA Level (< 0.2 ng/mL) at 44 Weeks

The proportion of patients with undetectable PSA level (< 0.2 ng/mL) at 44 weeks, defined as number of patients with undetectable PSA level at 44 weeks divided by number of patients randomized. (NCT01251861)
Timeframe: 44 weeks

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Arm A (Observation and Bicalutamide)0.093
Arm B (Akt Inhibitor MK2206 and Bicalutamide)0.148

[back to top]

PSA Slope After Randomization and Before Starting Bicalutamide

PSA slopes were assessed by multiple PSA values from randomization to starting bicalutamide treatment. Linear regression was used to calculate PSA slope using natural log-transformed PSA values on the time of PSA measurements for each patient. (NCT01251861)
Timeframe: After randomization and prior to starting bicalutamide

Interventionln(PSA)/month (Mean)
Arm A (Observation and Bicalutamide)0.10
Arm B (Akt Inhibitor MK2206 and Bicalutamide)0.06

[back to top]

Best PSA Response

The best PSA response was defined as the percentage change from Baseline to the smallest PSA value after Baseline including PSA results from samples taken after the study drug was stopped. For participants with no decrease in PSA post-baseline, the best PSA response was the smallest increase in PSA. For participants with no post-baseline PSA values, the PSA response was set to missing. PSA was analyzed at a central laboratory. (NCT01288911)
Timeframe: Baseline to the data cutoff date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Enzalutamide-92.96
Bicalutamide0.18

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response

Response assessments were reported by ICR for target lesions in soft tissues and non-target lesions in soft tissues based on CT and/or MRI according to RECIST version 1.1. Objective response was defined as the number of participants achieving either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR) based on participant's best overall response assessed at the end of the treatment. (NCT01288911)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cutoff date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Enzalutamide15.8
Bicalutamide2.6

[back to top]

PFS Based on Investigator Assessment

"PFS was calculated as the time from randomization to the date of the first progression event detected. A progression event was defined as objective evidence of radiographic disease progression based on the assessments by investigators, skeletal-related event, initiation of new antineoplastic therapy or death by any cause, whichever occurred first.~Radiographic disease progression was defined as either a progression in soft tissue on CT/MRI scan according to RECIST 1.1, and/or a progression in bone lesions on bone scan (≥ 2 new bone lesions) confirmed by the next bone scan.~A skeletal-related event was defined as radiation therapy or surgery to bone, pathologic bone fracture, spinal cord compression or change in antineoplastic therapy to treat bone pain.~The initiation of new antineoplastic therapy included any new therapy for the treatment of disease progression after the study drug administration started." (NCT01288911)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Enzalutamide15.3
Bicalutamide5.7

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Independent Central Review (ICR) Assessment

"PFS is the time from randomization to the date of the first progression event detected. A progression event was defined as objective evidence of radiographic disease progression based on the assessments by the ICR, skeletal-related event, initiation of new antineoplastic therapy or death by any cause, whichever occurred first.~Radiographic disease progression was defined as either a progression in soft tissue on computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, and/or a progression in bone lesions on bone scan (≥ 2 new bone lesions) confirmed by the next bone scan.~A skeletal-related event was any radiation therapy or surgery to bone, pathologic bone fracture, spinal cord compression or change in antineoplastic therapy to treat bone pain.~The initiation of new antineoplastic therapy included any new therapy for the treatment of disease progression after the study drug administration started." (NCT01288911)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Enzalutamide15.7
Bicalutamide5.8

[back to top]

Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response by Week 13

The PSA response by Week 13 was defined as the percentage change from Baseline to the smallest PSA value after Baseline (i.e., a decrease of 100% represents the largest possible decrease to a value below the lower limit of quantification) and on or before day 99 (i.e., upper boundary of the Week 13 visit window). For participants with no decrease in PSA post-baseline by Week 13, the PSA response by Week 13 was the smallest increase in PSA up to day 99. For participants with no post-baseline PSA values up to day 99, the PSA response by Week 13 was set to missing. PSA was analyzed at a central laboratory. (NCT01288911)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 13

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Enzalutamide-89.03
Bicalutamide0.36

[back to top]

Radiographic PFS Based on ICR Assessment

"Radiographic PFS was calculated as the time interval from the date of randomization to the first date of radiographic disease progression.~Radiographic disease progression was defined as either a progression in soft tissue on CT/MRI scan according to RECIST 1.1, and/or a progression in bone lesions (a minimum of 2 new bone lesions as compared to previous scan) on bone scan and confirmed by the next bone scan." (NCT01288911)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cutoff date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.

Interventionmonths (Median)
EnzalutamideNA
Bicalutamide16.4

[back to top]

Time to ≥ 30% PSA Decline From Baseline

The time to ≥ 30% PSA decline from Baseline was defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the first date a PSA decline from Baseline of at least 30% was recorded. In participants without ≥ 30% PSA decline from Baseline, the time to ≥ 30% PSA decline from Baseline was censored on the date of the last PSA sample taken. Participants who had no Baseline PSA and participants with no post-baseline PSA results were censored on the date of randomization. (NCT01288911)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cutoff date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Enzalutamide2.8
BicalutamideNA

[back to top]

Time to ≥ 50% PSA Decline From Baseline

The time to ≥ 50% PSA decline from Baseline was defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the first date a PSA decline from Baseline of at least 50% was recorded. In participants without ≥ 50% PSA decline from Baseline, the time to ≥ 50% PSA decline from Baseline was censored on the date of the last PSA sample taken. Participants who had no Baseline PSA and participants with no post-baseline PSA results were censored on the date of randomization. (NCT01288911)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cutoff date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Enzalutamide2.8
BicalutamideNA

[back to top]

Time to ≥ 90% PSA Decline From Baseline

The time to ≥ 90% PSA decline from Baseline was defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the first date a PSA decline from Baseline of at least 90% was recorded. In participants without ≥ 90% PSA decline from Baseline, the time to ≥ 90% PSA decline from Baseline was censored on the date of the last PSA sample taken. Participants who had no Baseline PSA and participants with no post-baseline PSA results were censored on the date of randomization. (NCT01288911)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cutoff date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Enzalutamide5.4
BicalutamideNA

[back to top]

Time to PSA ≤ 4 ng/mL

Time to PSA ≤ 4 ng/mL was defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the first date a decline in PSA to a result of 4 ng/mL or below was recorded. In participants without PSA results ≤ 4 ng/mL, the time to PSA ≤ 4 ng/mL was censored on the date of the last PSA sample taken. Participants with a PSA result ≤ 4 ng/mL at Baseline, participants with no Baseline PSA and participants with no post-baseline PSA results were censored on the date of randomization (NCT01288911)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cutoff date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Enzalutamide3.0
BicalutamideNA

[back to top]

Time to PSA Progression

Time to PSA progression was calculated as the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of first observation of PSA progression. PSA progression was defined as a ≥ 25% increase and an absolute increase of ≥ 2 ng/mL above the nadir (or above the baseline value for participants who did not have a decline in PSA post-baseline values), and confirmed by a second consecutive PSA assessment at least 3 weeks later. For participants with no documented PSA progression, the time to PSA progression was censored on the date the last PSA sample was taken. (NCT01288911)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cutoff date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Enzalutamide19.4
Bicalutamide5.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events

"A serious adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose:~Resulted in death~Was life threatening~Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity~Resulted in congenital anomaly or birth defect~Required inpatient hospitalization or led to prolongation of hospitalization~Other medically important events.~Treatment-related indicates adverse events assessed by the Investigator as probably or possibly related to study treatment. Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened after starting administration of study drug through end of the study (i.e., the treatment-emergent period)." (NCT01288911)
Timeframe: From initiation of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug or the 30-day safety follow-up visit, whichever was last (Median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in enzalutamide arm and 5.8 in bicalutamide arm, 12.6 in the total arm).

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
TEAEsRelated TEAEsDeathsSerious TEAEsDrug regimen-related serious TEAEsTEAEs leading to discontinuationDrug regimen-related TEAEs leading to discon.TEAEs leading to study drug interruption
Bicalutamide94.249.71.623.83.223.85.37.9
Enzalutamide94.566.75.533.36.629.57.710.4
Total Enzalutamide94.867.25.736.56.831.37.810.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Free From Biochemical Failure

Increase in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measured over time. Freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF) was defined from the time of enrollment until PSA failure occurs as defined by the Phoenix definition of a rise to 2 ng/mL above the nadir PSA value. (NCT01342367)
Timeframe: 4 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
SOC Cohort81
Oral ADT Group88

[back to top] [back to top]

Incidence of PSA Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Percentage of participants with stable (has not increased) or undetectable PSA post surgery. To assess Prostate-specific antigen(PSA)-progression free survival and prostate cancer specific survival for patients treated by chemohormonal therapy followed by salvage surgery for biopsy proven androgen-dependent high-risk locally recurrent prostate cancer following radiation therapy. (NCT01531205)
Timeframe: Four Months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental: Drug and Hormonal Therapy With Salvage Surgery0

[back to top]

Surgical Margin Negative Rate (SM Rate)

Post surgery percentage of participants with negative surgical margin. To determine the surgical margin negative rate in patients who have undergone chemohormonal therapy followed by surgery for biopsy proven androgen-dependent high risk locally recurrent prostate cancer following primary radiation therapy. Margin: The edge or border of the tissue removed in cancer surgery. The margin is described as negative or clean when the pathologist finds no cancer cells at the edge of the tissue, suggesting that all of the cancer has been removed. The margin is described as positive or involved when the pathologist finds cancer cells at the edge of the tissue, suggesting that all of the cancer has not been removed. (NCT01531205)
Timeframe: One Year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental: Drug and Hormonal Therapy With Salvage Surgery100

[back to top]

Incidence of Detecting Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC)

To determine the feasibility of detecting circulating tumor cells in this patient population. CTC results per patient in milliliters. (NCT01531205)
Timeframe: One Year

,
InterventionCTC/mL (Number)
Baseline CTC/mL1 Month CTC/mL3 Month CTC/mLBaseline CTC Clusters/mL1 Month CTC Clusters/mL3 Month CTC Clusters/mLBaseline Apop/mL1 Month Apop/mL3 Month Apop/mLBaseline Small Cells/mL1 Month Small Cells/mL3 Month Small Cells/mLBaseline CK-CTC/mL1 Month CK-CTC/mL3 Month CK-CTC/mL
Participant One212710281110003018
Participant Two16NA02NA14NA00NA01NA

[back to top]

Incidence of Complete Response (CR)

Percentage of participants with CR post surgery. To evaluate the pathological complete response rate to androgen ablation plus Cabazitaxel in patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer following radiation therapy. Pathological Complete Response (pCR): Participants with no residual cancer in the local resection specimen and pelvic lymph nodes will be considered pCR. (NCT01531205)
Timeframe: One Year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental: Drug and Hormonal Therapy With Salvage Surgery0

[back to top]

Incidence of Perioperative and Postoperative Morbidity

Number of events. To access the perioperative and postoperative morbidity with salvage surgery after neoadjuvant hormonal ablation and Cabazitaxel. (NCT01531205)
Timeframe: One Year

Interventionevents (Number)
Experimental: Drug and Hormonal Therapy With Salvage Surgery0

[back to top]

Testosterone Recovery at 12 and 24 Months

Testosterone recovery is defined as testosterone level after treatment greater than 230 ng/dL. Time to testosterone recovery is defined as time from randomization to the date of testosterone recovery, biochemical, local, or distant failure (competing risk), salvage therapy (competing risk), death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Testosterone recovery rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From registration to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years.

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
12 months24 months
ADT + RT19.432.9
TAK-700 + ADT + RT12.517.4

[back to top]

Change in Patient-reported Quality of Life as Measured by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Short Form at One Year

The EPIC-Short Form is a 26-item, validated self-administered tool to assess disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and its therapies consisting of five summary domains (bowel, urinary incontinence, urinary irritation/obstruction, sexual, and hormonal function). Responses for each item form a Likert scale which are transformed to a 0-100 scale. A domain score is the average of the transformed domain item scores, ranging from 0-100 with higher scores representing better health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Change at one year is defined as one-year value - baseline value. Positive change at one year indicates improved quality of life. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: Baseline, one year

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Bowel domainUrinary domainSexual domainHormonal domain
ADT + RT-5.45-1.67-24.18-17.31
TAK-700 + ADT + RT-7.04-5.31-27.26-17.45

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Distant Metastases

Distant metastases (failure) is defined as imaging or biopsy demonstrated evidence for systemic recurrence. Biopsy was not required, however it was encouraged in absence of a rising PSA. Time to failure is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here. Note, the protocol lists this endpoint as regional or distant metastasis, but regional progression data was not collected. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ADT + RT6.8
TAK-700 + ADT + RT2.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With General Clinical Treatment Failure

General clinical treatment failure (GCTF) is defined as: PSA > 25 ng/ml, documented local disease progression, regional or distant metastasis, or initiation of salvage androgen deprivation therapy. Failure time is defined as time from registration to the date of failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ADT + RT12.5
TAK-700 + ADT + RT6.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Local Progression

Local recurrence (failure) is defined as biopsy proven recurrence within the prostate gland. Time to failure is defined as time from randomization to the date of failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates reported.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ADT + RT2.9
TAK-700 + ADT + RT0.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Alive [Overall Survival] (Primary Endpoint of Original Protocol)

Note, the revised protocol (see Limitations and Caveats) changed this outcome measure from primary (original protocol) to secondary. Overall survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Overall survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. 5-year rates are provided. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ADT + RT89.4
TAK-700 + ADT + RT88.1

[back to top]

Hemoglobin A1c

(NCT01546987)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

,
Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Baseline12 months24 months
ADT + RT6.126.336.30
TAK-700 + ADT + RT6.015.956.04

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)

Body Mass Index (BMI) is a person's weight in kilograms (or pounds) divided by the square of height in meters (or feet). Change from baseline = time point value - baseline value. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: Baseline and yearly to five years.

,
Interventionkg/m^2 (Mean)
1 year2 years3 years4 years5 years
ADT + RT0.640.670.75-0.02-0.52
TAK-700 + ADT + RT-0.84-0.340.250.460.15

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Death Due to Prostate Cancer

Time to prostate cancer death is defined as time from randomization to the date of death due to prostate cancer, last known follow-up (censored), or death due to other causes (competing risk). Failure rates were to be estimated using the cumulative incidence method. If too few events occur for meaningful estimates, then only counts of events will be reported. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ADT + RT1
TAK-700 + ADT + RT0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Failure (Primary Endpoint of Revised Protocol)

Note, the revised protocol (see Limitations and Caveats) changed this outcome measure from secondary (original protocol) to primary. Biochemical failure will be defined by the Phoenix definition (PSA ≥ 2 ng/ml over the nadir PSA, the presence of local, regional, or distant recurrence, or the initiation of salvage androgen deprivation therapy. Time to failure is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ADT + RT17.3
TAK-700 + ADT + RT12.8

[back to top]

Change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form at One Year

The PROMIS Fatigue short form 8a contains 8 questions, each with 5 responses ranging from 1 to 5, evaluating self-reported fatigue symptoms over the past 7 days. The total score is the sum of all questions which is then converted into a pro-rated T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10, with a possible range of 33.1 to 77.8. Higher scores indicate more fatigue. Change is defined as value at one year - value at baseline. Positive change from baseline indicates increased fatigue at one year. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: Baseline, one year

InterventionT-score (Mean)
ADT + RT2.78
TAK-700 + ADT + RT3.16

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events

Time to grade 3 or higher adverse event (event) is defined as time from randomization to the date of first event, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Event rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ADT + RT34.9
TAK-700 + ADT + RT58.9

[back to top]

Serum Testosterone

(NCT01546987)
Timeframe: Baseline,12 months, 24 months

,
Interventionng/dL (Mean)
Baseline12 months24 months
ADT + RT355.7535.6886.47
TAK-700 + ADT + RT357.7325.2217.36

[back to top]

Serum High-density Lipoprotein (LDL)

(NCT01546987)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline12 months24 months
ADT + RT88.7886.1881.35
TAK-700 + ADT + RT87.8583.7395.34

[back to top]

Serum High-density Lipoprotein (HDL)

(NCT01546987)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline12 months24 months
ADT + RT40.9144.9442.16
TAK-700 + ADT + RT41.3244.5044.85

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Clinical Survivorship Events

"Clinical survivorship events are defined as the following newly diagnosed non-fatal cardiovascular events or other clinical endpoints relevant to prostate cancer survivorship:~type 2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, and osteoporotic fracture." (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Type 2 diabetesCoronary artery diseaseMyocardial infarctionStrokePulmonary embolismDeep vein thrombosisOsteoporotic fracture
ADT + RT3016651086
TAK-700 + ADT + RT181486571

[back to top]

Number of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse Event

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0) grades adverse event severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From registration to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Garde 4Grade 5
ADT + RT17543143
TAK-700 + ADT + RT2455591

[back to top]

Median Testosterone Recovery Time

Testosterone recovery is defined as testosterone level after treatment greater than 230 ng/dL. Testosterone recovery rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, censoring for biochemical, local, or distant failure, salvage therapy, death, and otherwise alive without event. Testosterone recovery time is defined as time from randomization to testosterone recovery or censoring. (NCT01546987)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Interventionyears (Median)
ADT + RTNA
TAK-700 + ADT + RTNA

[back to top]

Fasting Total Cholesterol

(NCT01546987)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline12 months24 months
ADT + RT149.71160.27163.20
TAK-700 + ADT + RT154.20154.74160.61

[back to top]

Fasting Plasma Glucose

(NCT01546987)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline12 months24 months
ADT + RT98.99102.27104.24
TAK-700 + ADT + RT100.52117.39105.51

[back to top]

Best Overall Soft Tissue Response

Best overall soft tissue response is defined as partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) while on study treatment based on investigator assessment of target, nontarget, and new lesions using RECIST 1.1. Only participants in the metastatic population with measurable soft tissue disease (at least 1 target lesion identified per RECIST 1.1) at screening were included in the analysis. All percentages are based on number of participants with metastatic and measurable soft tissue disease at screening in each treatment group. (NCT01664923)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 09 February 2015, median duration of treatment was 14.7 months in the enzalutamide arm and 8.4 months in the bicalutamide arm.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Enzalutamide60.0
Bicalutamide14.0

[back to top]

Quality of Life: Time to Degradation of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (FACT-P)

The FACT-P is a multidimensional, self-reported quality of life instrument consisting of 27 core items that assess patient function in 4 domains: physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being, and supplemented by 12 site-specific items to assess for prostate-related symptoms. Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 Likert-type scale, and then combined to produce subscale scores for each domain, as well as a global quality of life score (0 to 156) with higher scores representing better quality of life. Time to degradation of FACT-P was defined as the time from randomization to first assessment with at least a 10-point decrease from baseline in the global FACT-P score for each participant. Participants with no score degradation at the time of analysis data cutoff were censored at the date of last assessment showing no degradation. (NCT01664923)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 09 February 2015, median duration of treatment was 14.7 months in the enzalutamide arm and 8.4 months in the bicalutamide arm.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Enzalutamide8.4
Bicalutamide8.3

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as time from randomization to earliest objective evidence of prostate specific-antigen (PSA) progression, radiographic progression, or death on study. PSA progression was defined as ≥ 25% increase in PSA with an absolute increase ≥ 2 ng/mL above the nadir and was to be confirmed by a second consecutive assessment. Radiographic progression in bone was based on The Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group (PCWG2) guidelines defined as at least 2 new lesions on bone scan. Radiographic progression in soft tissue on Computerized Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CT/MRI) was based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). CT/MRI and bone scans were read locally by the same radiologist (or nuclear medicine physician for interpretation of bone scans) whenever possible. Participants not known to have had a PFS event at the time of the analysis data cutoff were censored at the date of last assessment. (NCT01664923)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 09 February 2015, median duration of treatment was 14.7 months in the enzalutamide arm and 8.4 months in the bicalutamide arm.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Enzalutamide19.4
Bicalutamide5.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study treatment without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying), persistent or significant disability or incapacity, congenital anomaly. A treatment emergent AE defined as an event that emerged during treatment period (From first dose of study drug until end of open label phase [up to maximum duration of 65 months]) that was absent before treatment, or worsened during treatment period relative to pre-treatment state. AE included both serious and non- SAE. Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. An AE was considered related to study drug if event was assessed by investigator as probably or possibly related. (NCT01664923)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until the end of open label phase (up to maximum duration of 65 months)

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Any AEAE Leading to Study Drug DiscontinuationAE Leading to DeathSerious AEAE Related to Study DrugSerious AE Related to Study Drug
DB Phase: Bicalutamide90.413.13.030.353.53.5
Enzalutamide96.416.24.638.666.57.6
Open Label Phase: Bicalutamide Crossover to Enzalutamide97.324.38.143.270.32.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a PSA Response ≥ 50%

PSA response was defined as a reduction in PSA of at least 50% from baseline at any post baseline assessment confirmed by a second PSA assessment at least 3 weeks later. (NCT01664923)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 09 February 2015, median duration of treatment was 14.7 months in the enzalutamide arm and 8.4 months in the bicalutamide arm.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Enzalutamide81.3
Bicalutamide31.3

[back to top]

Time to PSA Progression

PSA progression was defined as ≥ 25% increase in PSA with an absolute increase ≥ 2 ng/mL above the nadir and was to be confirmed by a second consecutive assessment at least 3 weeks later. Participants not known to have had PSA progression were censored at the date of last PSA assessment. (NCT01664923)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 09 February 2015, median duration of treatment was 14.7 months in the enzalutamide arm and 8.4 months in the bicalutamide arm.

Interventionmonths (Median)
EnzalutamideNA
Bicalutamide8.3

[back to top]

Duration of Radiographic PFS

Duration of radiographic PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the earliest objective evidence of radiographic disease progression or death on study and was to be evaluated for participants with metastatic disease at study entry. Radiographic disease progression in bone was based on PCWG2 guidelines defined as at least 2 new lesions on bone scan. Radiographic disease progression in soft tissue on CT/MRI was based on RECIST 1.1. CT/MRI and bone scans were read locally by the same radiologist (or nuclear medicine physician for interpretation of bone scans) whenever possible. Participants not known to have had radiographic progression at the time of analysis data cutoff were censored at the date of last radiographic assessment. (NCT01664923)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 09 February 2015, median duration of treatment was 14.7 months in the enzalutamide arm and 8.4 months in the bicalutamide arm.

Interventionmonths (Median)
EnzalutamideNA
Bicalutamide8.3

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

"Progression Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the time from random assignment to first documentation of PSA progression, radiologic progression, clinical progression, or death, whichever occurred first.~PSA progression is defined as a ≥25% increase AND and absolute increase of at last 2 ng/mL from the nadir PSA (or from baseline PSA if there was no drop in PSA after starting treatment).~Radiologic progression is defined as two or more new lesions on radionuclide bone scans.~Clinical progression is defined using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions." (NCT01809691)
Timeframe: From study start to the data cutoff date, May 18, 2021, approximately 8 years, 2 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
LHRHa + TAK-70047.6
LHRHa + Bicalutamide23.0

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from random assignment to the date of death from any cause (NCT01809691)
Timeframe: From study start to the data cutoff date, May 18, 2021, approximately 8 years, 2 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
LHRHa + TAK-70081.1
LHRHa + Bicalutamide70.2

[back to top]

PSA Response Rates

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rates were divided into complete response (CR: PSA < 0.2 ng/mL), partial response (PR: PSA between 0.2 and 4.0 ng/mL), and no response (NR: PSA > 4.0 ng/mL) at a 7-month landmark after random assignment. (NCT01809691)
Timeframe: 7 months after randomization

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseNo Response
LHRHa + Bicalutamide443125
LHRHa + TAK-700582219

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With PSA Remission Assessed Using the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group (PCWG2) Criteria

Number of Participants with PSA Remission Assessed Using the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group (PCWG2) Criteria specifically at the 7 month time point. The binary endpoint (yes/no) will be summarized with its point estimate (an occurrence rate), and 2-sided Wilson type 95% confidence interval (CI). PSA response rates will be compared by treatment arm in a stratified logistic regression model. (NCT02058706)
Timeframe: Month 7

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A (Enzalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)29
Arm B (Bicalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)16

[back to top]

Overall Survival at 2 Years

Overall Survival will be measured from date of registration to death or last follow up. OS will be estimated with standard K-M methodology. Point and CI estimates of the 2-year rate will derived from the K-M life table. (NCT02058706)
Timeframe: Assessed at 2 years

Interventionpercentage alive at 2 years (Number)
Arm A (Enzalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)82
Arm B (Bicalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)54

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Progression-free at 6 Months

Will be estimated with standard K-M methodology. Point and CI estimates of the six-month rate will be derived from the K-M life table. (NCT02058706)
Timeframe: From registration to PSA progression defined by PCWG II criteria or measurable disease by RECIST 1.1, assessed at 6 months

Interventionpercentage progression-free at 6 months (Number)
Arm A (Enzalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)92
Arm B (Bicalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)45

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Bone Metastases Progression Free at Six Months

Percentage of patients with bone metastases Progression free at six months using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02058706)
Timeframe: assessed at six months

Interventionpercentage not progressed at 6 months (Number)
Arm A (Enzalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)91
Arm B (Bicalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)33

[back to top]

The Percentage of Patients Responding

Point estimates will be calculated and CI estimates will be derived from the Wilcoxon method using STATA software. (NCT02058706)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of response at 6 months (Number)
Arm A (Enzalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)86
Arm B (Bicalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)79

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure

Time to Treatment Failure from date of first treatment to date off treatment or date patient is taken off study for any reason. TTF will be estimated with standard K-M methodology. Point and CI estimates of the median and various time point-specific rates will be derived from the K-M life table. (NCT02058706)
Timeframe: Assessed up to 6 years.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm B (Bicalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)8.2
Arm A (Enzalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)20.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Progression Free at One Year

Percentage of patients progression free at one year using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02058706)
Timeframe: assessed at 1 year

Intervention% participants not progressed at 1 year (Number)
Arm A (Enzalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)84
Arm B (Bicalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)34

[back to top]

Achievement of PSA Response Assessed Using PCWG2 Criteria

Will be summarized with point estimates (occurrence rates), and 2-sided Wilson type 95% CIs. (NCT02058706)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A (Enzalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)30
Arm B (Bicalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)17

[back to top]

The Number of Participants With a CTC Response

Will be summarized with point estimates (occurrence rates). A CTC response is defined as any level of CTC < 5 that is maintained or any level of CTC that is reduced from baseline. (NCT02058706)
Timeframe: Up to month 1

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm B (Bicalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)17
Arm A (Enzalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)22

[back to top]

Achievement of Measurable Disease Response

The number of participants with Measurable disease response per RECIST v1.1. (NCT02058706)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A (Enzalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)17
Arm B (Bicalutamide and LHRH Analogue Therapy)17

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Who Achieve Undetectable PSA (<0.2ng/mL)

(NCT02059213)
Timeframe: Up to 54 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ADT Alone13
ADT + Ibrance®22

[back to top]

Biochemical Progression-free Survival Rate

12-month biochemical progression-free survival rate will begin from treatment start until the event of biochemical (PSA) progression or death, whichever occurs first. Described by arm using Kaplan-Meier methods. (NCT02059213)
Timeframe: Up to 54 months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
12-month26-month (time of last event in Arm 1)43-month (time of last event in Arm 2)
ADT + Ibrance®76.559.433.9
ADT Alone74.745.845.8

[back to top] [back to top]

Clinical Progression-free Survival Rate

12-month clinical progression-free survival rate will begin from treatment start until the event of biochemical (PSA) progression or death, whichever occurs first. Described by arm using Kaplan-Meier methods. (NCT02059213)
Timeframe: Up to 54 months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
12-month22-month (time of last event in Arm 1)32-month (time of last event in Arm 2)
ADT + Ibrance®83.877.758.5
ADT Alone77.764.864.8

[back to top]

Frequency of Dose Modification

Dose modifications will be reported to describe tolerability for arm 2 only (Ibrance®) (NCT02059213)
Timeframe: Up to 54 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
No Dose Reduction (Palbociclib 125mg/day)1 Dose Reduction, to Palbociclib 100mg/day2 Dose Reductions, to Palbociclib 75mg/day
ADT + Ibrance®2857

[back to top]

Frequency of Treatment Delay

Treatment delays will be reported to describe tolerability within each arm. (NCT02059213)
Timeframe: Up to 54 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
No Treatment delay of BicalutamideTreatment Delay of BicalutamideNo Treatment Delay of PalbociclibTreatment Delay of Palbociclib
ADT + Ibrance®3552119
ADT Alone19100

[back to top]

Duration of Therapy

Duration of therapy will be reported to describe tolerability within each arm. (NCT02059213)
Timeframe: Up to 54 months

Interventionmonths (Mean)
ADT Alone22.4
ADT + Ibrance®22.0

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Achieve a PSA ≤ 4ng/mL After Seven Months of Protocol Treatment in Each Arm

The primary analysis will be assessment of the proportion of patients who achieve a (Prostate-specific antigen) PSA < 4ng/mL after seven months of protocol treatment in each arm. (NCT02059213)
Timeframe: 28 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ADT Alone16
ADT + Ibrance®32

[back to top]

Prostatic Volume as a Measure of Tumor Radiologic Progression Using Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

MRI is an imaging technique used to investigate the anatomy and function of the body. Measurements were taken to calculate the prostatic volume in cubic millimeters (mm^3). (NCT02085252)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

,
Interventionmm^3 (Mean)
BaselineMonth 12
Active Surveillance49.4448.33
Leuprorelin 11.25 mg48.4851.47

[back to top]

Highest Diameter of the Lesion as a Measure of Tumor Radiologic Progression Using Dynamic MRI

MRI is an imaging technique used to investigate the anatomy and function of the body. Measurements were taken to determine the diameter of the lesions in millimeters (mm). (NCT02085252)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12

,
Interventionmm (Mean)
BaselineMonth 12
Active Surveillance7.787.69
Leuprorelin 11.25 mg6.396.25

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) Total Symptom (S) Score

The I-PSS is an 8-question tool used to measure prostate symptoms (≤7: mildly symptomatic; 8-19 moderately symptomatic; 20-35 severely symptomatic). The first 7 symptom questions answered on a scale of 0 (never) to 5 (almost always) are used to determine the I-PSS Total S Score for a total possible score of 0 to 35. The 8th question is quality of life and is not reported here. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. An Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model fitted with baseline I-PSS total score and age as covariates was used for analysis. (NCT02085252)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 9 and 12

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change at Month 3Change at Month 6Change at Month 9Change at Month 12
Active Surveillance1.030.320.640.93
Leuprorelin 11.25 mg0.37-0.38-1.13-0.48

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) Questionnaire Score

The IIEF-5, a 5 question patient completed questionnaire, is a measure of erectile dysfunction over the past 6 months. Each question is answered on a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best). Total score ranges from 5 to 25 with higher scores indicating better function (5-7: severe; 8-11: moderate; 12-16: mild to moderate;17-21: mild; 22-25: none). A positive change from baseline indicates improvement. A negative change from baseline indicates a worsening. An ANCOVA model fitted with baseline IIEF-5 score and age as covariates was used for analyses. (NCT02085252)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 9 and 12

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change at Month 3Change at Month 6Change at Month 9Change at Month 12
Active Surveillance0.000.01-0.38-0.02
Leuprorelin 11.25 mg-7.40-5.87-1.94-1.68

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Levels

Blood was collected and sent to a central laboratory for analysis of PSA reported in milligrams/milliliter (mg/mL). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. An ANCOVA model fitted with baseline PSA Level and age as covariates was used for analyses. (NCT02085252)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 9 and 12

,
Interventionmg/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Change at Month 3Change at Month 6Change at Month 9Change at Month 12
Active Surveillance0.220.850.710.76
Leuprorelin 11.25 mg-4.61-3.27-1.460.17

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Score

The HADS is a 14-item scale that measures anxiety (7-items) and depression (7-items) over the previous week. Each question is answered on a scale of 0 (best) to 3 (worst) for a total possible score of 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating more anxiety and depression. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. An ANCOVA model fitted with baseline HADS score and age as covariates was used for analyses. (NCT02085252)
Timeframe: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 9 and 12

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change at Month 3Change at Month 6Change at Month 9Change at Month 12
Active Surveillance-1.20-1.58-1.76-1.95
Leuprorelin 11.25 mg-0.83-1.44-2.06-1.87

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Negative Biopsies at Month 12

Staging biopsy of at least 12 cores were sampled and analyzed according to a centralized biopsy procedure which confirm the results of the first biopsy [presence of positive cores, the absence of core with tumor length > 3 millimeters (mm), and absence Grade 4 cells (Gleason score < 7)]. The Gleason score grades prostate cancer tissue, based on its appearance under a microscope. Scores range from 2 to 10, with a higher score meaning that the cancer tissue is more likely to spread. (NCT02085252)
Timeframe: Month 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Leuprorelin 11.25 mg28
Active Surveillance17

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Gleason Score ≥ 7

Gleason score grades prostate cancer tissue, based on its appearance under a microscope. Scores range from 2 to 10, with a higher score meaning that the cancer tissue is more likely to spread. (NCT02085252)
Timeframe: Month 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Leuprorelin 11.25 mg1
Active Surveillance3

[back to top]

Biochemical Response Rate Based on PSA

Participants with undetectable PSA after 32 weeks (NCT02614859)
Timeframe: 32 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bicalutamide3
Metformin and Bicalutamide5

[back to top]

BMI Decline After 32 Weeks

Number of patients with BMI decline after 32 weeks (NCT02614859)
Timeframe: 32 Weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A4
Arm B12

[back to top]

PSA Decline

Number of patients with PSA decline after 8 weeks (observation vs metformin) (NCT02614859)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bicalutamide1
Metformin and Bicalutamide8

[back to top]

PSA Decline ≥ 85% at 32 Weeks

Number of patients with PSA decline ≥ 85% after 32 weeks (NCT02614859)
Timeframe: 32 Weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A6
Arm B10

[back to top]

Median PSA Decline

Median PSA decline after 8 weeks % (range) (NCT02614859)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionpercent change (Median)
BicalutamideNA
Metformin and Bicalutamide9

[back to top]

Safety of the Multimodality Therapy as Assessed by Number of Participants With Neutropenia and Surgical or Radiation Toxicities

"To assess the safety and therapeutic benefit of multimodality therapy in men presenting with newly diagnosed oligometastatic prostate cancer (<5 sites of metastases). Safety is defined as the incidence of Grades 3 and 4 neutropenia and surgical- or radiation-induced toxicities.~Neutropenia is a lower than normal number of neutrophils (a type of white blood cell) in the blood. Although dependent on the specific laboratory, the normal number is of neutrophils is generally about 1500-7800 cells/microliter. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia refer to neutrophil levels <1,000-500 and <500, respectively. The average risk of docetaxel-induced Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia is about 35%. During the course of the study, if we had seen evidence that the risk of Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was >50%, the study would have been stopped." (NCT02716974)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Chemohormonal and Definitive Therapy26

[back to top]

Efficacy as Assessed by 2-year PSA Progression-free Survival Rate

To evaluate efficacy of multimodality therapy in men, defined as the 2 year PSA progression-free (PSA<0.2 ng/ml) survival among men who have non-castrate testosterone levels 2 years after enrollment. Number of participants (who have non-castrate testosterone levels 2 years after enrollment) with PSA progression-free survival. (NCT02716974)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Chemohormonal and Definitive Therapy17

[back to top]

Time to Prostate-specific Antigen Recurrence

To investigate the time from an undetectable prostate-specific antigen (≤0.2 ng/mL) until the prostate-specific antigen is >0.2 over two time-points. (NCT02716974)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Chemohormonal and Definitive Therapy31

[back to top]

Time to Prostate-specific Antigen Recurrence

To investigate the time from an undetectable Prostate-specific antigen (≤0.2 ng/mL) until the Prostate-specific antigen is >0.2 over two time-points. (NCT03043807)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionMonth (Median)
Chemohormonal and Definitive Therapy After ProstatectomyNA

[back to top]

Number of Participants Requiring Hospitalization

Number of outpatient participants diagnosed with COVID-19 who require hospitalization by day 28 (NCT04652765)
Timeframe: up to 28 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard of Care (SOC)0
SOC Plus Camostat0
SOC Plus Camostat and Bicalutamide0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Symptoms

(NCT04652765)
Timeframe: up to 21 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard of Care (SOC)1
SOC Plus Camostat2
SOC Plus Camostat and Bicalutamide2

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

All-cause Mortality

Number of participants deceased. (NCT04652765)
Timeframe: up to 60 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Standard of Care (SOC)0
SOC Plus Camostat0
SOC Plus Camostat and Bicalutamide0

[back to top]