Page last updated: 2024-12-04

methamphetamine

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth

Description

Methamphetamine: A central nervous system stimulant and sympathomimetic with actions and uses similar to DEXTROAMPHETAMINE. The smokable form is a drug of abuse and is referred to as crank, crystal, crystal meth, ice, and speed. [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

methamphetamine : A member of the class of amphetamines in which the amino group of (S)-amphetamine carries a methyl substituent. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID10836
CHEMBL ID1201201
CHEBI ID6809
SCHEMBL ID42615
MeSH IDM0013551

Synonyms (145)

Synonym
44ral3456c ,
crank
meth (street name)
crystal meth
speed [street name]
methamphetaminum
crystal meth [street name]
ice [street name]
unii-44ral3456c
crank [street name]
(s)-phenylmethylaminopropane
j6.362b ,
CHEMBL1201201
benzeneethanamine, n,.alpha.-dimethyl-, (s)-
phenethylamine, n,.alpha.-dimethyl-, (s)-(+)-
d-methamphetamine
d-(s)-methamphetamine
1-phenyl-2-methylaminopropane
nsc25115
(+)-(s)-deoxyephedrine
wln: 1my1&1r -d
(+)-n-methylamphetamine
d-1-phenyl-2-methylaminopropane
metamphetamine
d-deoxyephedrine
nsc-25115
methyl-.beta.-phenylisopropylamine
benzeneethanamine,.alpha.-dimethyl-, (s)-
d-1-phenyl-2-methylaminopropan
d-desoxyephedrine
phenethylamine,.alpha.-dimethyl-, (s)-(+)-
(+)-methamphetamine
d-n,.alpha.-dimethylphenethylamine
d-phenylisopropylmethylamine
norodin
n-methylamphetamine
d-n-methylamphetamine
(+)-methylamphetamine
phenethylamine,.alpha.-dimethyl-, (+)-
benzeneethanamine,.alpha.-dimethyl-, (+)-
methylamphetamine
d-methylamphetamine
desoxyephedrine hydrochloride
dea no. 1105
phenethylamine, n,alpha-dimethyl-, (s)-(+)-
metamfetamine [inn]
metanfetamina [spanish]
n-methyl-beta-phenylisopropylamine
methamphetaminum [inn-latin]
metamfetaminum [inn-latin]
stimulex
methamphetaminum [jp]
metamfetamina [inn-spanish]
metamfetaminum [latin]
nsc 25115
metanfetamina [inn-spanish]
(+)-n,alpha-dimethylphenethylamine
phenethylamine, n,alpha-dimethyl-, (+)-
n-methyl-beta-phenylisopropylamin [german]
einecs 208-668-7
speed
benzeneethanamine, n,alpha-dimethyl-, (+)-
s-(+)-methamphetamine
hsdb 3359
(alphas)-n,alpha-dimethylbenzeneethanamine
(+)-(s)-n-alpha-dimethylphenethylamine
metanfetamina
(2s)-n-methyl-1-phenylpropan-2-amine
(s)-n,alpha-dimethylbenzeneethanamine
metamfetaminum
dextromethamphetamine
CHEBI:6809 ,
PDSP2_001388
PDSP2_001389
PDSP1_001404
(s)-methamphetamine
(s)-(+)-deoxyephedrine
(s)-methylamphetamine
benzeneethanamine, n,alpha-dimethyl-, (s)-
(s)-(+)-methamphetamine
metamfetamine
desyphed
d-1-phenyl-2-methylaminopropan [german]
phenethylamine, n,alpha-dimethyl-, (s)-(+)- (8ci)
benzeneethanamine, n,alpha-dimethyl-, (alphas)- (9ci)
(s)-n,alpha-dimethylbenzeneethanoamine
1-phenyl-2-methylamino-propan [german]
d-n,alpha-dimethylphenethylamine
methyl-beta-phenylisopropylamine
(+)-n,alpha-dimethyl-beta-phenylethylamine
benzeneethanamine, n,alpha-dimethyl-, (alphas)-
metamfetamina
(+)-2-(n-methylamino)-1-phenylpropane
2s-(+)-methamphetamine
(s)-(+)-n,alpha,dimethylphenethylamine
meth
methamphetamine
C07164
537-46-2
DB01577
PDSP1_001405
n methylamphetamine
B40 ,
D08187
metamfetamine (inn)
n-methyl-beta-phenylisopropylamin
1-phenyl-2-methylamino-propan
(+ )-methylamphetamine
n-methyl-1-phenyl-2-propanamine
bdbm50359499
EPITOPE ID:178090
methamphetamine [vandf]
methamphetamine [mi]
methamphetamine [hsdb]
metamfetamine [who-dd]
d-n,a-dimethylphenethylamine
SCHEMBL42615
desyphed hydrochloride (salt/mix)
(+)-n,.alpha.-dimethyl-.beta.-phenylethylamine
benzeneethanamine, n,.alpha.-dimethyl-, (+)-
phenethylamine, n,.alpha.-dimethyl-, (+)-
(+)-n,.alpha.-dimethylphenethylamine hydrochloride (salt/mix)
(+)-n,.alpha.-dimethylphenethylamine
(+)-(s)-n-.alpha.-dimethylphenethylamine
desoxyephedrine hydrochloride (salt/mix)
n-methyl-1-phenyl-2-propanamine #
DTXSID8037128 ,
methyl[(2s)-1-phenylpropan-2-yl]amine
intra-venous methamphetamine
(s)-n-methyl-1-phenylpropan-2-amine
methamphetamine (ma)
Q191924
n,i+/--dimethyl-phenethyl amine
dtxcid6017128
metamfetaminum (latin)
n06ba03
crystal meth (street name)
metamfetaminum (inn-latin)
ice (street name)
crank (street name)
metamfetamina (inn-spanish)
methamphetaminum (inn-latin)
speed (street name)
metamfetamine racemate
metanfetamina (inn-spanish)

Research Excerpts

Toxicity

Methamphetamine administration during ibudilast treatment was well tolerated without additive cardiovascular effects or serious adverse events. It is not clear whether these IEG responses are involved in a methamphetamine-induced toxic cascade or in protective mechanisms against the deleterious effects of the drug.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"The adverse effects of l-methamphetamine on the development of rat embryos were studied by means of a whole culture system."( The adverse effects of l-methamphetamine on the development of explanted rat embryos.
Nakamura, Y; Ozaki, T; Saito, Y, 1992
)
0.28
" In addition, when these drugs are used concomitantly such as in polydrug abuse, it has been suggested that they may cause synergistic adverse effects on the myocardium."( A primary culture system of postnatal rat heart cells for the study of cocaine and methamphetamine toxicity.
Welder, AA, 1992
)
0.28
"In summary, we have shown that MA is toxic to both 5-HT and DA cells and we have proposed a mechanism that would account for this response, namely, the conversion of the transmitters to neurotoxins."( Neurotoxicity in dopamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine terminal fields: a regional analysis in nigrostriatal and mesolimbic projections.
Axt, K; Commins, DL; Marek, G; Seiden, LS; Vosmer, G, 1988
)
0.27
"The toxic effects of methamphetamine on dopamine and serotonergic neurons have recently been linked to the endogenous formation of 6-hydroxydopamine and 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine, respectively."( Pretreatment with ascorbic acid attenuates the neurotoxic effects of methamphetamine in rats.
Carelli, RM; Jarvis, MF; Wagner, GC, 1985
)
0.27
" These findings suggest that methamphetamine exerts direct toxic effects on adult rat myocytes rather than indirect ones via receptors, although further experiments on more concentrations of propranolol are required."( Methamphetamine-induced toxicity in cultured adult rat cardiomyocytes.
He, SY, 1995
)
0.29
") resulted in a significant increase in the hepatocellular necrosis produced by minimally toxic to moderately toxic doses of CCl4 (0."( Methamphetamine potentiation of carbon tetrachloride hepatotoxicity in mice.
Harbison, RD; James, RC; Roberts, SM, 1994
)
0.29
" This suggests that glutamate also mediates the toxic effects of METH."( Methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity: roles for glutamate and dopamine efflux.
Stephans, SE; Yamamoto, BK, 1994
)
0.29
" These results indicate that a toxic regimen of METH selectively causes striatal energy impairment and raise the possibility that perturbations of energy metabolism play a role in METH-induced dopaminergic neurotoxicity."( Rapid ATP loss caused by methamphetamine in the mouse striatum: relationship between energy impairment and dopaminergic neurotoxicity.
Chan, P; DeLanney, LE; Di Monte, DA; Irwin, I; Langston, JW; Luo, JJ, 1994
)
0.29
" Using a potent and selective ligand of sigma binding sites, 6-[6-(4-hydroxypiperidinyl)hexyloxy]-3-methylflavone (NPC 16377), we further investigated the influence of sigma ligands on additional behavioral and toxic effects of cocaine in mice."( Effects of the selective sigma receptor ligand, 6-[6-(4-hydroxypiperidinyl)hexyloxy]-3-methylflavone (NPC 16377), on behavioral and toxic effects of cocaine.
Ferkany, J; Hickey, P; Katz, JL; Menkel, M; Pontecorvo, M; Terry, P; Witkin, JM, 1993
)
0.29
"Methamphetamine and MDMA as well as similar substituted phenethylamines are toxic to DA and/or 5-HT neurons."( Methamphetamine and methylenedioxymethamphetamine neurotoxicity: possible mechanisms of cell destruction.
Sabol, KE; Seiden, LS, 1996
)
0.29
" The toxic dose of MA (5 mg/kg, sc, x4) significantly decreased contents of dopamine (DA), dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and homovanillic acid (HVA) in the striatum (ST), and significantly decreased contents of serotonin (5-HT) in the ST, nucleus accumbens (NA) and medial frontal contex (MFC)."( Effects of nitric oxide synthesis inhibition on methamphetamine-induced dopaminergic and serotonergic neurotoxicity in the rat brain.
Abekawa, T; Koyama, T; Ohmori, T, 1996
)
0.29
" In the present paper, the authors comment on an important role of glutamatergic systems in the behavioral and toxic effects of MA."( The role of glutamate in behavioral and neurotoxic effects of methamphetamine.
Abekawa, T; Koyama, T; Ohmori, T, 1996
)
0.29
" In the present study, we tested the idea that toxic doses of METH might cause long-term increases in AP-1 DNA-binding."( Methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity is associated with increased striatal AP-1 DNA-binding activity in mice.
Cadet, JL; Ladenheim, B; Moran, TH; Sheng, P; Wang, XB, 1996
)
0.29
"METH is a monoaminergic toxic that destroys dopamine terminals in vivo."( Nitric oxide is a mediator of methamphetamine (METH)-induced neurotoxicity. In vitro evidence from primary cultures of mesencephalic cells.
Ali, S; Cadet, JL; Cerruti, C; Sheng, P, 1996
)
0.29
" Together with the results of the N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine and N(G)-nitro-L-arginine experiments, the data suggest that NO plays little or no role in the toxic mechanism of action of METH or MDMA."( Nitric oxide and the neurotoxic effects of methamphetamine and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine.
Finnegan, KT; Taraska, T, 1997
)
0.3
" The toxic dose of MA markedly increased extracellular DA, and decreased DOPAC and 5-HIAA in both ST and NA."( [Experimental study of methamphetamine psychosis--role of glutamate and nitric oxide in methamphetamine-induced dopaminergic and serotonergic neurotoxicity in the rat brain].
Abekawa, T, 1997
)
0.3
" The effect of methamphetamine on morphine-dependent mice was investigated by calculating the LD50 (i."( Increased toxicity of methamphetamine in morphine-dependent mice.
al-Shabanah, OA; Bakheet, SA; Ginawi, OT, 1997
)
0.3
"The toxic effects of methamphetamine (METH) (2."( Differential toxic effects of methamphetamine (METH) and methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) in multidrug-resistant (mdr1a) knockout mice.
Cadet, JL; Hirata, H; Ladenheim, B; Mann, H; Moran, TH, 1997
)
0.3
" METH's toxic effects on brain 5-HT neurons were either unaffected or exacerbated by 2-DG, depending on species, brain region, and dose of METH tested."( Effects of 2-deoxy-D-glucose on methamphetamine-induced dopamine and serotonin neurotoxicity.
Callahan, B; Hatzidimitriou, G; Ricaurte, G; Stover, G; Yuan, J, 1998
)
0.3
" This increase was significantly greater in striatum and coincided with the greater vulnerability of this brain region to the toxic effects of METH."( Substrates of energy metabolism attenuate methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity in striatum.
Douglas, AJ; Lust, WD; Stephans, SE; Whittingham, TS; Yamamoto, BK, 1998
)
0.3
" These toxic effects are thought to be due to oxidative stress."( Melatonin attenuates methamphetamine-induced toxic effects on dopamine and serotonin terminals in mouse brain.
Asanuma, M; Cadet, JL; Hirata, H, 1998
)
0.3
" It is not clear, however, whether these IEG responses are involved in a methamphetamine-induced toxic cascade or in protective mechanisms against the deleterious effects of the drug."( Null mutation of c-fos causes exacerbation of methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity.
Cadet, JL; Deng, X; Ladenheim, B; Tsao, LI, 1999
)
0.3
"Multiple dose administration of methamphetamine (MA) results in long-lasting toxic effects in the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system."( Protection of methamphetamine nigrostriatal toxicity by dietary selenium.
Bing, G; Choi, DY; Floyd, RA; Im, DH; Jhoo, WK; Kim, HC; Shin, EJ; Suh, JH, 1999
)
0.3
"Methamphetamine is toxic to dopaminergic and serotonergic neurons in rodents; however, little data are available on the toxic effects of methamphetamine on the human brain."( Evidence for long-term neurotoxicity associated with methamphetamine abuse: A 1H MRS study.
Chang, L; Ernst, T; Leonido-Yee, M; Speck, O, 2000
)
0.31
" The present study was undertaken to assess the toxic effects of METH caused dose-dependent increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and cell death."( Serum withdrawal potentiates the toxic effects of methamphetamine in vitro.
Cadet, JL; Ordonez, S, 2000
)
0.31
" To determine if the vesicular pool of DA was essential for the expression of METH-induced DA neurotoxicity, reserpine (3 mg/kg, given iintraperitoneally 24-26 h prior to METH) was given prior to a toxic dose regimen of METH."( Evidence against an essential role of endogenous brain dopamine in methamphetamine-induced dopaminergic neurotoxicity.
Callahan, BT; McCann, UD; Ricaurte, GA; Yuan, J, 2001
)
0.31
" AMIL markedly potentiated the toxic effect of METH on DA neurons."( Inhibitors of Na(+)/H(+) and Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchange potentiate methamphetamine-induced dopamine neurotoxicity: possible role of ionic dysregulation in methamphetamine neurotoxicity.
Callahan, BT; Cord, BJ; McCann, UD; Ricaurte, GA; Yuan, J, 2001
)
0.31
" Thus, METH appears to be more toxic when taken while exposed to loud music."( Methamphetamine toxicity in mice is potentiated by exposure to loud music.
Dean, LC; Hickey, MA; Morton, AJ, 2001
)
0.31
"The psychostimulant methamphetamine (MA) is toxic to nigro-striatal dopaminergic terminals in both experimental animals and humans."( Alpha-1B adrenergic receptor knockout mice are protected against methamphetamine toxicity.
Battaglia, G; Busceti, CL; De Blasi, A; Fornai, F; Lembo, G; Nicoletti, F, 2003
)
0.32
"The aim of this study was to examine the role of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) in the toxic action of methamphetamine on dopaminergic neurones in rats."( Neuroprotective action of MPEP, a selective mGluR5 antagonist, in methamphetamine-induced dopaminergic neurotoxicity is associated with a decrease in dopamine outflow and inhibition of hyperthermia in rats.
Gołembiowska, K; Konieczny, J; Ossowska, K; Wolfarth, S, 2003
)
0.32
" While typical antipsychotics are often switched to atypical agents when adverse effects become limiting, there is little preclinical information to support this strategy, both in terms of efficacy and side effects."( Combined treatment of quetiapine with haloperidol in animal models of antipsychotic effect and extrapyramidal side effects: comparison with risperidone and chlorpromazine.
Matsuoka, N; Mutoh, S; Shirakawa, K; Tada, M, 2004
)
0.32
"In mice, the recreational drug (+/-)3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine [MDMA ("ecstasy")] produces a selective toxic effect on brain dopamine (DA) neurons."( Identification and characterization of metallothionein-1 and -2 gene expression in the context of (+/-)3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine-induced toxicity to brain dopaminergic neurons.
Becker, KG; Cheadle, C; Donovan, DM; McCann, UD; Mechan, AO; Ricaurte, GA; Tong, L; Xie, T; Yuan, J, 2004
)
0.32
" The aim of this study was, therefore, to determine whether intraocular injection of methamphetamine (MA) is toxic to the healthy adult rat retina and to analyse its effects on the compromised retina after an injection of the ionotropic glutamate receptor agonist, kainate, which is known to cause retinal neuropathology."( Methamphetamine exacerbates the toxic effect of kainic acid in the adult rat retina.
Osborne, NN; Rodrigues, LG; Schmidt, KG; Tavares, MA; Wood, JP, 2004
)
0.32
" In order to measure the toxic effects to the brain, rats were given equimolar doses of MDMA (40 mg/kg/day) and METH (32 mg/kg/day) in subcutaneously implanted osmotic minipumps for a period of 5 days, and in-vitro autoradiography using [3H]-paroxetine, [3H]-mazindol, [3H]-methylspiperone, and [3H]-flunitrazepam, was performed on brain sections."( The neurotoxic effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and methamphetamine on serotonin, dopamine, and GABA-ergic terminals: an in-vitro autoradiographic study in rats.
Armstrong, BD; Noguchi, KK, 2004
)
0.32
" The microglial activation that occurs after a toxic methamphetamine challenge was blunted likewise."( Attenuated microglial activation mediates tolerance to the neurotoxic effects of methamphetamine.
Kuhn, DM; Thomas, DM, 2005
)
0.33
" Both Tat and METH were toxic to neurons in a time- and dose-dependent fashion."( The role of mitochondrial alterations in the combined toxic effects of human immunodeficiency virus Tat protein and methamphetamine on calbindin positive-neurons.
Adame, A; Crews, L; Grigorian, A; Hurford, R; Langford, D; Masliah, E, 2004
)
0.32
" In adult rodents, toxic effects of methamphetamine may result partly from aberrant cytosolic dopamine accumulation and subsequent reactive oxygen species formation."( Age-dependent methamphetamine-induced alterations in vesicular monoamine transporter-2 function: implications for neurotoxicity.
Baudys, J; Crouch, DJ; Fleckenstein, AE; Gibb, JW; Hanson, GR; Johnson-Davis, KL; Truong, JG; Wilkins, DG, 2005
)
0.33
" These results extend our recent findings of additive toxic effects when METH is combined with MDMA."( MDMA ('Ecstasy') and methamphetamine combined: order of administration influences hyperthermic and long-term adverse effects in female rats.
Clemens, KJ; Cornish, JL; Hunt, GE; Li, KM; McGregor, IS, 2005
)
0.33
"Bupropion treatment was well tolerated, with bupropion- and placebo-treated groups reporting similar rates of adverse events."( Safety of intravenous methamphetamine administration during treatment with bupropion.
Chiang, N; De La Garza, R; Elkashef, A; Fong, T; Kahn, R; Li, SH; Newton, TF; Roache, JD; Wallace, CL, 2005
)
0.33
" These results suggest that zinc-induced MT expression protects dopaminergic neurons via preventing the accumulation of toxic reactive oxygen species and halting the decrease in ATP levels."( Metallothionein provides zinc-mediated protective effects against methamphetamine toxicity in SK-N-SH cells.
Ajjimaporn, A; Ebadi, M; Govitrapong, P; Shavali, S; Swinscoe, J, 2005
)
0.33
" Parkin is thought to be critical for protecting dopaminergic neurons from toxic insults by targeting misfolded or oxidatively damaged proteins for proteasomal degradation."( Parkin-deficient mice are not more sensitive to 6-hydroxydopamine or methamphetamine neurotoxicity.
Curtis, WR; Palmiter, RD; Perez, FA, 2005
)
0.33
" In general, adverse events were mild or moderate, and no subjects were discontinued due to adverse events or serious adverse events."( A comprehensive assessment of the safety of intravenous methamphetamine administration during treatment with selegiline.
Anderson, A; Bloch, DA; Chiang, N; De La Garza, R; Elkashef, A; Fong, T; Holmes, TH; Newton, TF, 2005
)
0.33
" These results indicate anti-METH mAb6H4 can safely reduce the hemodynamic and locomotor effects of METH given one day after anti-METH IgG, and that the mAb is safe when administered in the absence of METH."( Safety and efficiency of an anti-(+)-methamphetamine monoclonal antibody in the protection against cardiovascular and central nervous system effects of (+)-methamphetamine in rats.
Berg, RJ; Gentry, WB; Laurenzana, EM; Owens, SM; Terlea, T; West, JR; Williams, DK, 2006
)
0.33
" Estrogen altered the toxic effects of the second invasion of MA as indicated by a significant decrease in striatal dopamine (DA) and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) concentrations."( Effect of estrogen upon methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity within the impaired nigrostriatal dopaminergic system.
Dluzen, DE; Liu, B, 2006
)
0.33
" These findings suggest that (a) a neurotoxic regimen of METH produces selective increase in NO in the striatum, which may generate toxic species such as peroxynitrite, and (b) toxins other than NO-related derivatives may mediate dopaminergic neurotoxicity in the amygdala and frontal cortex."( Methamphetamine-induced selective dopaminergic neurotoxicity is accompanied by an increase in striatal nitrate in the mouse.
Anderson, KL; Itzhak, Y, 2006
)
0.33
" Adverse effects from the use of haloperidol such as prolonged QTc, dystonic reactions, and torsades de pointes were recorded."( Pharmacologic treatment of acute pediatric methamphetamine toxicity.
Ruha, AM; Yarema, MC, 2006
)
0.33
" No serious adverse effects were observed from the use of these agents."( Pharmacologic treatment of acute pediatric methamphetamine toxicity.
Ruha, AM; Yarema, MC, 2006
)
0.33
" Their abuse is associated with severe neurologic and psychiatric adverse events including the development of psychotic states."( Neurotoxicity of substituted amphetamines: molecular and cellular mechanisms.
Cadet, JL; Jayanthi, S; Krasnova, IN; Lyles, J, 2007
)
0.34
" Ondansetron was well tolerated and was less likely than placebo to be associated with serious adverse events."( A preliminary randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of ondansetron in the treatment of methamphetamine dependence.
Ait-Daoud, N; Bloch, DA; Elkashef, AM; Johnson, BA; Kahn, R; Li, SH; Smith, EV; Vocci, F, 2008
)
0.35
"We examined the hyperthermic and lethal toxic effects of methamphetamine in dopamine transporter (DAT) and/or serotonin transporter (SERT) knockout (KO) mice."( Methamphetamine-induced hyperthermia and lethal toxicity: role of the dopamine and serotonin transporters.
Fukushima, S; Hall, FS; Hata, H; Kobayashi, H; Lesch, KP; Murphy, DL; Numachi, Y; Ohara, A; Sora, I; Uhl, GR; Watanabe, H; Yamashita, M, 2007
)
0.34
" Thus, the purpose of the present paper is to review the clinical and basic observations that METH potentiates the adverse effects of HIV infection."( Interactions of HIV and methamphetamine: cellular and molecular mechanisms of toxicity potentiation.
Cadet, JL; Krasnova, IN, 2007
)
0.34
"Striking parallels exist between the neurochemical and toxic effects of stress and methamphetamine."( Chronic stress enhances methamphetamine-induced extracellular glutamate and excitotoxicity in the rat striatum.
Tata, DA; Yamamoto, BK, 2008
)
0.35
"Methamphetamine (METH) is a potent inducer of dopamine (DA) release, and is toxic to DA neurons."( Zinc rescues dopaminergic SK-N-SH cell lines from methamphetamine-induced toxicity.
Ajjimaporn, A; Ebadi, M; Govitrapong, P; Shavali, S, 2008
)
0.35
"The purpose of this study was to test a version of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) for predicting safe sex behavior in a sample of 228 HIV-negative heterosexual methamphetamine users."( Predictors of safer sex intentions and protected sex among heterosexual HIV-negative methamphetamine users: an expanded model of the Theory of Planned Behavior.
Mausbach, BT; Patterson, TL; Semple, SJ; Strathdee, SA, 2009
)
0.35
" This study describes childhood adverse events (CAEs) among methamphetamine (MA)-dependent men and women and assesses the relationship of CAEs to the onset and severity of dependence."( Childhood adverse events and methamphetamine use among men and women.
Ang, A; Hillhouse, M; Hunter, J; Marinelli-Casey, P; Messina, N; Rawson, R, 2008
)
0.35
" Thus, in the present study we analyzed the long-term impact of an acute toxic regimen of METH (4 mg/kg, subcutaneous x 4 injections, 2 h apart) on the reactivity of adult male rats to environmental stimuli, and correlated it to toxicity on 5-HT and DA innervations."( Methamphetamine induces long-term alterations in reactivity to environmental stimuli: correlation with dopaminergic and serotonergic toxicity.
Bini, V; Bortolato, M; Castelli, MP; Diaz, G; Ennas, MG; Frau, R; Gessa, G; Luesu, W; Piras, AP, 2009
)
0.35
" However, the toxic mechanisms of methamphetamine are not well understood."( Neurotoxic effects of methamphetamine.
Dhanasekaran, M; Karuppagounder, SS; Suppiramaniam, V; Thrash, B; Uthayathas, S, 2010
)
0.36
" Currently, various approaches are being taken to develop a novel and cost-effective anti-Parkinson's drug with minimal adverse effects and the added benefit of a neuroprotective effect to facilitate and improve the care of patients with Parkinson's disease."( Methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity: the road to Parkinson's disease.
Ahuja, M; Dhanasekaran, M; Suppiramaniam, V; Thiruchelvan, K; Thrash, B,
)
0.13
" Secondary end-points were the rate of control of chronic cough at each step of therapy, the duration of treatment required, changes in cough symptom score, health-related quality of life and possible adverse effects."( Efficacy and safety of modified sequential three-step empirical therapy for chronic cough.
Li, X; Liang, S; Liu, B; Lü, H; Qiu, Z; Wang, L; Wang, Y; Wei, W; Yu, L, 2010
)
0.36
" Sympathomimetic adverse effects are common and severe effects are also reported."( Clinical characteristics of mephedrone toxicity reported to the U.K. National Poisons Information Service.
Adams, RD; Cooper, G; James, D; Lupton, DJ; Spears, R; Thomas, SH; Thompson, JP, 2011
)
0.37
" METH binge exposure in adolescence led to greater damage in the nigrostrial dopaminergic system when mice were exposed to METH binge later in life, suggesting a long-term adverse effect on the dopaminergic system."( Decreased level of Nurr1 in heterozygous young adult mice leads to exacerbated acute and long-term toxicity after repeated methamphetamine exposure.
Chiang, YH; Hoffer, B; Kuang, SY; Luo, Y; Wang, Y, 2010
)
0.36
"To review and improve the evidence base regarding the toxic effects of Mephedrone, a cathinone derivative which was first believed to have been synthesised and propagated in 2007."( Mephedrone toxicity in a Scottish emergency department.
Macdonald, C; Mitchelson, M; Regan, L, 2011
)
0.37
" None of the respondents reported that the once-legal status of mephedrone implied that it was safe to use."( Experiences with mephedrone pre- and post-legislative controls: perceptions of safety and sources of supply.
McElrath, K; O'Neill, C, 2011
)
0.37
" In a forward genetic screen, we identified a mutant resistant to the toxic effects of dopamine."( A Caenorhabditis elegans p38 MAP kinase pathway mutant protects from dopamine, methamphetamine, and MDMA toxicity.
McIntire, SL; Schreiber, MA, 2011
)
0.37
" In this study we tested possible neuroprotective effects of modafinil after toxic METH administration in mice."( Attenuated methamphetamine induced neurotoxicity by modafinil administration in mice.
Bisagno, V; Giorgeri, S; Goitia, B; Peskin, V; Raineri, M; Taravini, IR; Urbano, FJ, 2011
)
0.37
" Therefore, σ receptors provide a viable target for the development of pharmacotherapeutics against the adverse effects of METH."( CM156, a high affinity sigma ligand, attenuates the stimulant and neurotoxic effects of methamphetamine in mice.
Kaushal, N; Matsumoto, RR; McCurdy, CR; Medina, MA; Mesangeau, C; Seminerio, MJ; Shaikh, J; Wilson, LL,
)
0.13
" The results indicate that caffeine potentiates the toxic effects of methamphetamine, possibly via a mechanism involving an increase in dopamine release and excess ROS generation."( Caffeine potentiates methamphetamine-induced toxicity both in vitro and in vivo.
Govitrapong, P; Jaisin, Y; Morales, NP; Plasen, D; Plasen, S; Ratanachamnong, P; Sanvarinda, Y; Sinchai, T, 2011
)
0.37
" The toxic effects of METH involve excessive dopamine (DA) release, thus DA receptors are highly likely to play a role in this process."( Dopamine D(1) receptor deletion strongly reduces neurotoxic effects of methamphetamine.
Ares-Santos, S; Colado, MI; Granado, N; Martin, ED; Moratalla, R; O'Shea, E; Oliva, I, 2012
)
0.38
" The current study implicates PDIA3 to be an important cellular neuroprotective mechanism against a toxic drug, and as a potential target for therapeutic investigations."( Protective role for the disulfide isomerase PDIA3 in methamphetamine neurotoxicity.
Fox, HS; Ninemire, C; Pendyala, G, 2012
)
0.38
" While it is known that their abuse could result in adverse health complications, including neurotoxicity, both the environmental conditions and activity states associated with their intake could strongly enhance drug toxicity, often resulting in life-threatening health complications."( Environmental conditions modulate neurotoxic effects of psychomotor stimulant drugs of abuse.
Kiyatkin, EA; Sharma, HS, 2012
)
0.38
" Supplementation of cells with exogenous calpastatin was able to reverse the toxic effect of METH on reduction in cell viability and tyrosine hydroxylase phosphorylation."( Calpastatin reduces calpain and caspase activation in methamphetamine-induced toxicity in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cultured cells.
Chetsawang, B; Govitrapong, P; Phansuwan-Pujito, P; Suwanjang, W, 2012
)
0.38
" Promoting the idea that a particular recreational drug is a major direct cause of unsafe sex may have the unintended adverse effect of creating an excuse for engaging in unsafe sex, thereby increasing its use, and may incur opportunity costs by preventing limited available health promotion resources from being directed more usefully."( Is it really crystal clear that using methamphetamine (or other recreational drugs) causes people to engage in unsafe sex?
Digiusto, E; Rawstorne, P, 2013
)
0.39
" Exposure to a toxic dose of METH significantly decreased cell viability, and tyrosine hydroxylase phosphorylation, but increased c-Jun phosphorylation and active, GTP-bound Ras in cultured SH-SY5Y cells."( Farnesyltransferase inhibitor attenuates methamphetamine toxicity-induced Ras proteins activation and cell death in neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells.
Chetsawang, B; Govitrapong, P; Pirompul, N, 2013
)
0.39
" The results show that fetal Nrf2 deficiency enhances METH-initiated oxidative DNA damage and toxicity, suggesting that Nrf2 activation of cytoprotective proteins mitigates the effects of ROS and their oxidative damage to cellular macromolecules, thereby protecting the developing fetus from adverse structural and postnatal neurodevelopmental consequences."( Developmental role of nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 in mitigating methamphetamine fetal toxicity and postnatal neurodevelopmental deficits.
Ramkissoon, A; Wells, PG, 2013
)
0.39
"Psychostimulant methamphetamine (METH) is toxic to striatal dopaminergic and serotonergic nerve terminals in adult, but not in the adolescent, brain."( Co-administration of betulinic acid and methamphetamine causes toxicity to dopaminergic and serotonergic nerve terminals in the striatum of late adolescent rats.
Killinger, B; Moszczynska, A; Shah, M, 2014
)
0.4
" Safety measures included the frequency, duration, severity, and relatedness of adverse events reported."( Safety and efficacy of varenicline to reduce positive subjective effects produced by methamphetamine in methamphetamine-dependent volunteers.
Bennett, RS; De La Garza, R; Mahoney, JJ; Newton, TF; Thompson-Lake, DG; Verrico, CD, 2014
)
0.4
"Reported ingestion of benzofuran compounds is associated with similar toxic effects to those of amphetamines and cathinones."( Patterns of presentation and clinical features of toxicity after reported use of ([2-aminopropyl]-2,3-dihydrobenzofurans), the 'benzofuran' compounds. A report from the United Kingdom National Poisons Information Service.
Cooper, G; Eddleston, M; Hill, SL; James, D; Kamour, A; Lupton, DJ; Thanacoody, R; Thomas, SH; Thompson, JP; Vale, A, 2014
)
0.4
" Previous study demonstrated that caffeine potentiates the toxic effect of METH in association with the production of reactive oxygen species and the induction of apoptosis."( Autophagy inhibition by caffeine increases toxicity of methamphetamine in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line.
Govitrapong, P; Jantaratnotai, N; Jariyawat, S; Pitaksalee, R; Sanvarinda, P; Sanvarinda, Y; Sinchai, T; Thampithak, A; Tuchinda, P, 2015
)
0.42
" To examine the roles of each of these proteins in methylone-induced toxic effects, we used SERT and DAT knockout (KO) mice and assessed the hyperthermic and lethal effects caused by a single administration of methylone."( Methylone-induced hyperthermia and lethal toxicity: role of the dopamine and serotonin transporters.
Goda, Y; Hall, FS; Ito, M; Kikura-Hanajiri, R; Lesch, KP; Moriya, Y; Murphy, DL; Ohara, A; Piao, YS; Sora, I; Uhl, GR, 2015
)
0.42
" Reported adverse effects of methiopropamine use are mostly anecdotal user reports on Internet forums, and there are limited data on its pharmacodynamics and toxicity in the literature."( A Fatal Case of Isolated Methiopropamine (1-(Thiophen-2-yl)-2-Methylaminopropane) Toxicity: A Case Report.
Anne, S; Cala, AD; Tse, R, 2015
)
0.42
"Administration of amphetamine and methamphetamine can elicit psychiatric adverse effects at acute administration, binge use, withdrawal, and chronic use."( Neuropsychiatric Adverse Effects of Amphetamine and Methamphetamine.
Harro, J, 2015
)
0.42
" Melatonin reversed the toxic effects of METH by restoring cell viability and inhibiting the increase in mitochondrial Fis1 levels and the mitochondrial translocation of Drp1 and Bax."( Melatonin attenuates the mitochondrial translocation of mitochondrial fission proteins and Bax, cytosolic calcium overload and cell death in methamphetamine-induced toxicity in neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells.
Chetsawang, B; Govitrapong, P; Parameyong, A, 2015
)
0.42
" Overall, our findings indicated that, in most cases, PMMA death occurred rapidly and at an early stage of PMMA metabolism, following the ingestion of large and toxic PMMA doses."( Is toxicity of PMMA (paramethoxymethamphetamine) associated with cytochrome P450 pharmacogenetics?
Arnestad, M; Bogen, IL; Bremer, S; Vevelstad, M; Zackrisson, AL; Øiestad, EL, 2016
)
0.43
" In conclusion, the study suggests a potentially dangerous effect of concomitant caffeine and mephedrone, and highlights the importance of taking polydrug use into consideration when investigating the acute adverse effect profile of popular recreational drugs."( Caffeine alters the behavioural and body temperature responses to mephedrone without causing long-term neurotoxicity in rats.
Fone, KC; Green, AR; King, MV; Shortall, SE, 2016
)
0.43
" We monitored cardiovascular effects, methamphetamine pharmacokinetics, and reported adverse events."( Safety of Intravenous Methamphetamine Administration During Ibudilast Treatment.
Andrenyak, DM; DeYoung, DZ; Furst, BA; Heinzerling, KG; Moody, DE; Shoptaw, SJ; Swanson, AN; Tsuang, J; Wu, YN; Yi, Y, 2016
)
0.43
"Ibudilast treatment had similar rates of adverse events compared with placebo, and there was no significant augmentation of cardiovascular effects of methamphetamine."( Safety of Intravenous Methamphetamine Administration During Ibudilast Treatment.
Andrenyak, DM; DeYoung, DZ; Furst, BA; Heinzerling, KG; Moody, DE; Shoptaw, SJ; Swanson, AN; Tsuang, J; Wu, YN; Yi, Y, 2016
)
0.43
"Methamphetamine administration during ibudilast treatment was well tolerated without additive cardiovascular effects or serious adverse events, providing initial safety data to pursue ibudilast's effectiveness for the treatment of methamphetamine dependence."( Safety of Intravenous Methamphetamine Administration During Ibudilast Treatment.
Andrenyak, DM; DeYoung, DZ; Furst, BA; Heinzerling, KG; Moody, DE; Shoptaw, SJ; Swanson, AN; Tsuang, J; Wu, YN; Yi, Y, 2016
)
0.43
" The incidence of serious adverse events did not differ between intervention and placebo groups based on qualitative reports from trials."( Efficacy and safety of psychostimulants for amphetamine and methamphetamine use disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Baker-Beal, L; Bhatnagar, N; Bhatt, M; Laplante, P; Mouravska, N; Samaan, Z; Thabane, L; Worster, A; Zielinski, L, 2016
)
0.43
" These toxic effects were attenuated by CB1R knockout or CB1R antagonists."( Genetic or pharmacological depletion of cannabinoid CB1 receptor protects against dopaminergic neurotoxicity induced by methamphetamine in mice.
Dang, DK; Jang, CG; Jeong, JH; Kim, HC; Ledent, C; Mai, AT; Nabeshima, T; Nah, SY; Onaivi, ES; Shin, EJ; Yamamoto, T, 2017
)
0.46
" This enhanced vulnerability likely relates to the toxic effects of METH that overlap with PD pathology, for example, aberrant functioning of α-synuclein and parkin."( Self-administration of methamphetamine alters gut biomarkers of toxicity.
Celeste Napier, T; Flack, A; Kousik, SM; Moszczynska, A; Persons, AL, 2017
)
0.46
" The findings highlight the need for ED staff to understand the nature of ICE use and its adverse impact on the mental and physical health of users."( Safety, risk, and aggression: Health professionals' experiences of caring for people affected by methamphetamine when presenting for emergency care.
Cleary, M; Jackson, D; Kornhaber, R; Sayers, J; Usher, K; Woods, C, 2017
)
0.46
"Methamphetamine (METH) is an addictive stimulant drug that has many negative consequences, including toxic effects to the brain."( Methamphetamine toxicity-induced calcineurin activation, nuclear translocation of nuclear factor of activated T-cells and elevation of cyclooxygenase 2 levels are averted by calpastatin overexpression in neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells.
Abubakar, Z; Chetsawang, B; Chetsawang, J; Govitrapong, P; Nudmamud-Thanoi, S; Phonchai, R, 2018
)
0.48
") of amfetamine or methamfetamine after naltrexone treatment, adverse events and physiological changes (e."( Efficacy and safety of naltrexone for amfetamine and methamfetamine use disorder: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Anand, S; Chan, EW; Lam, L; Li, X; Tse, ML; Zhao, JX, 2019
)
0.51
" Both amfetamine and methamfetamine studies showed good tolerability of naltrexone, with few adverse events seen."( Efficacy and safety of naltrexone for amfetamine and methamfetamine use disorder: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Anand, S; Chan, EW; Lam, L; Li, X; Tse, ML; Zhao, JX, 2019
)
0.51
" The present study showed strong cytotoxic potential for the NPS 5F-PB-22 and MDAI, moderate effects for MDMA, MDPV, methylone, cathinone, 4-MEC, and mephedrone, and no toxic effects for methamphetamine."( Cytotoxicity of new psychoactive substances and other drugs of abuse studied in human HepG2 cells using an adopted high content screening assay.
Beck, A; Flockerzi, V; Maurer, HH; Meyer, MR; Richter, LHJ, 2019
)
0.51
" This class of new psychoactive substances (NPS) also has potential for use and abuse coupled with a range of possible adverse effects including neurotoxicity and lethality."( Abuse potential and toxicity of the synthetic cathinones (i.e., "Bath salts").
Angoa-Perez, M; Anneken, JH; Hall, FS; Kuhn, DM; López-Arnau, R; Muskiewicz, D; Nelson, KH; Riley, AL; Shen, HW; To, P; Wang, D; Wang, Y; Xu, P, 2020
)
0.56
" Adverse events are monitored at each weekly assessment."( A study protocol for the N-ICE trial: A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC) as a pharmacotherapy for methamphetamine ("ice") dependence.
Arunogiri, S; Baker, AL; Bathish, R; Berk, M; Carter, G; Cordaro, F; Dean, OM; Dietze, P; Higgs, P; Hill, H; Kelly, PJ; Kent, M; Liang, W; Lubman, DI; Manning, V; McKetin, R; Quinn, B; Raftery, D; Reid, D; Sinclair, B; Te Pas, N; Thomas, T; Turner, A, 2019
)
0.51
" However, few studies on the toxic effects induced by the combination of MA and KET have been reported."( Effects of combined toxicity of methamphetamine and ketamine on apoptosis, oxidative stress and genotoxicity in HepG2 cells.
Liang, Z; Yin, P; Zhao, L, 2019
)
0.51
" R type and S type methamphetamines possess similar physicochemical properties, but has largely different pharmacological and toxic effects."( Research Progress on Chiral Separation Methods and Toxic Effects of Methamphetamine Enantiomers.
Li, L; Ma, AD; Zhang, YY; Zhou, ZZ, 2019
)
0.51
"Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and methcathinone (MCAT) are abused psychostimulant drugs that produce adverse effects in human users that include hepatotoxicity and death."( High ambient temperature increases the toxicity and lethality of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine and methcathinone.
Chen, Y; Hall, FS; Saber, YH; Tran, HTN, 2020
)
0.56
" Under the same conditions, even a very high dose of MCAT produced limited toxic or lethal effects."( High ambient temperature increases the toxicity and lethality of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine and methcathinone.
Chen, Y; Hall, FS; Saber, YH; Tran, HTN, 2020
)
0.56
" Although an initial mouse study reported that several cathinones were much less toxic than METH or MDMA, the present results suggest that it will be essential to assess the potential dangers posed by these drugs under high ambient temperatures."( High ambient temperature increases the toxicity and lethality of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine and methcathinone.
Chen, Y; Hall, FS; Saber, YH; Tran, HTN, 2020
)
0.56
" Locomotor activity after METH (0-560 mg/kg, intra-abdominal, n = 8 per group) administration and spontaneous locomotor activity in surviving cockroaches in an open field 24 h after LD50 study doses was measured with Noldus Ethovision."( Methamphetamine-Induced Open Field Behavior and LD50 in Periplaneta americana Cockroaches (Blattodea: Blattidae).
Berquist, MD; Findley, DL; Hambuchen, MD, 2021
)
0.62
" It has adverse effects such as apoptosis and breakdown of the blood-brain barrier."( TBHQ-Overview of Multiple Mechanisms against Oxidative Stress for Attenuating Methamphetamine-Induced Neurotoxicity.
Liu, L; Liu, M; Wang, Y; Zhao, W; Zhao, YL, 2020
)
0.56
" Additionally, our study sought to evaluate treatment modalities, specifically antipsychotics, in this population with the intent to characterize their adverse effects."( Pediatric Methamphetamine Toxicity: Clinical Manifestations and Therapeutic Use of Antipsychotics-One Institution's Experience.
Gerkin, RD; Malashock, HR; O'Connor, AD; Roberts, AR; Snow, JW; Yeung, C, 2021
)
0.62
" Nature, source, and route of exposure along with clinical manifestations including signs, complications, treatments utilized, and adverse events related to treatment were recorded."( Pediatric Methamphetamine Toxicity: Clinical Manifestations and Therapeutic Use of Antipsychotics-One Institution's Experience.
Gerkin, RD; Malashock, HR; O'Connor, AD; Roberts, AR; Snow, JW; Yeung, C, 2021
)
0.62
" Antipsychotics were often used as an adjunct treatment in this cohort of patients, and no adverse events were reported."( Pediatric Methamphetamine Toxicity: Clinical Manifestations and Therapeutic Use of Antipsychotics-One Institution's Experience.
Gerkin, RD; Malashock, HR; O'Connor, AD; Roberts, AR; Snow, JW; Yeung, C, 2021
)
0.62
"The adverse effects on model fish induced by methamphetamine (METH) have been revealed."( Assessment on the adverse effects on different kinds of fish induced by methamphetamine during the natural attenuation process based on adverse outcome pathway.
Du, P; Han, S; Li, X; Wang, Z; Xu, Z, 2021
)
0.62
" Two participants withdrew from the trial in the first week: one relocated away from the study site, the other self-withdrew due to a possible, known side effect of LDX (agitation)."( Safety and tolerability of oral lisdexamfetamine in adults with methamphetamine dependence: a phase-2 dose-escalation study.
Bruno, R; Carr, A; Clifford, B; Dunlop, A; Ezard, N; Lintzeris, N; Liu, Z; Siefried, KJ, 2021
)
0.62
"LDX at a dose of up to 250 mg/day was safe and well tolerated by study participants, warranting larger trials as a pharmacotherapy for MA dependence."( Safety and tolerability of oral lisdexamfetamine in adults with methamphetamine dependence: a phase-2 dose-escalation study.
Bruno, R; Carr, A; Clifford, B; Dunlop, A; Ezard, N; Lintzeris, N; Liu, Z; Siefried, KJ, 2021
)
0.62
"Evidence about the adverse effects of methamphetamine (METH) on invertebrates is scarce."( Assessment on chronic and transgenerational toxicity of methamphetamine to Caenorhabditis elegans and associated aquatic risk through toxicity indicator sensitivity distribution (TISD) analysis.
Dai, S; Du, W; Wang, J; Wang, Z; Zhu, L, 2021
)
0.62
"Drugs affecting dopaminergic neurotransmission may exert toxic and beneficial effects that persist after discontinuation by modulating gene expression in key brain regions."( Converging dopaminergic neurotoxicity mechanisms of antipsychotics, methamphetamine and levodopa.
Dimitriou, A; Efthimiou, P; Karveli, M; Lagadinou, M; Skaltsa, M; Tsigkou, A; Velissaris, D; Zareifopoulos, N, 2021
)
0.62
"The dopaminergic neurotoxins 6-oxidopamine and 1-methyl-4-phenyl-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) promote oxidative stress and inhibit mitochondrial function, while their affinity for the dopamine transporter ensures they are attain toxic intracellular concentrations exclusively in dopaminergic neurons."( Converging dopaminergic neurotoxicity mechanisms of antipsychotics, methamphetamine and levodopa.
Dimitriou, A; Efthimiou, P; Karveli, M; Lagadinou, M; Skaltsa, M; Tsigkou, A; Velissaris, D; Zareifopoulos, N, 2021
)
0.62
" An increase in dopamine may induce adverse effects such as behavioral sensitization and excessive locomotion."( Possible repair mechanisms of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, matrix metalloproteinase-9 inhibitors and protein hormones on methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity.
Liu, L; Liu, M; Wang, Y; Zhao, W; Zhao, YL, 2021
)
0.62
" Long-term uses and toxic high doses of MA can induce neurotoxicity."( The neuroprotective role of melatonin against methamphetamine toxicity-induced neurotransmission dysregulation and cognitive deficits in rats.
Chetsawang, B; Harnpramukkul, A; Komlao, P; Kraiwattanapirom, N; Ngampramuan, S; Promyo, K, 2021
)
0.62
" Safety was the number of adverse events (AEs) by system organ class."( Lisdexamfetamine for the treatment of acute methamphetamine withdrawal: A pilot feasibility and safety trial.
Acheson, LS; Brett, J; Christmass, M; Dunlop, A; Ezard, N; Farrell, M; Gill, A; Lintzeris, N; McKetin, R; Rodgers, C; Shoptaw, S; Siefried, KJ, 2022
)
0.72
" There were no treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs)."( Lisdexamfetamine for the treatment of acute methamphetamine withdrawal: A pilot feasibility and safety trial.
Acheson, LS; Brett, J; Christmass, M; Dunlop, A; Ezard, N; Farrell, M; Gill, A; Lintzeris, N; McKetin, R; Rodgers, C; Shoptaw, S; Siefried, KJ, 2022
)
0.72
"A tapering dose regimen of lisdexamfetamine was safe and feasible for the treatment of acute methamphetamine withdrawal in an inpatient setting."( Lisdexamfetamine for the treatment of acute methamphetamine withdrawal: A pilot feasibility and safety trial.
Acheson, LS; Brett, J; Christmass, M; Dunlop, A; Ezard, N; Farrell, M; Gill, A; Lintzeris, N; McKetin, R; Rodgers, C; Shoptaw, S; Siefried, KJ, 2022
)
0.72
"Methamphetamine (METH) is an amphetamine-type stimulant that is highly toxic to the central nervous system (CNS)."( The Role of Non-coding RNAs in Methamphetamine-Induced Neurotoxicity.
Chen, Q; Chen, X; Huang, Y; Li, L; Qiao, D; Xu, L, 2023
)
0.91

Pharmacokinetics

Methamphetamine (METH) pharmacokinetics after single iv doses show significant differences between male and female rats. The purpose of this research was to evaluate IXT-v100, given in combination with the adjuvant GLA-SE, to determine its efficacy in antagonizing methamphetamine disposition.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" A one-compartment pharmacokinetic model incorporating a lag time fits the data best."( Pharmacokinetics of oral methamphetamine and effects of repeated daily dosing in humans.
Cook, CE; Hill, JM; Jeffcoat, AR; Perez-Reyes, M; Pugh, DE; Sadler, BM; Voyksner, RD; White, WR,
)
0.13
" Although the ewes had higher peak concentrations, the fetuses' longer elimination half-life ultimately led to higher fetal than maternal methamphetamine concentrations."( Disposition and pharmacodynamics of methamphetamine in pregnant sheep.
Abrams, RM; Burchfield, DJ; DeVane, CL; Lucas, VW; Miller, RL, 1991
)
0.28
"This study proposes a method capable of separating the pharmacodynamic from the pharmacokinetic component in the methamphetamine (MA) hyperactivity potentiation induced by antidepressants."( Behavioral differentiation between pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic components of the interaction of antidepressants or neuroleptics with methamphetamine.
Dall'Olio, R; Gandolfi, O; Montanaro, N; Vaccheri, A, 1986
)
0.27
"To establish whether the actions of D-amphetamine (Amp) and D-methamphetamine (MeAmp) on the striatal dopamine system were equipotent, pharmacokinetic profiles of each drug were applied to an analysis of their respective induced dopamine efflux profiles."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of the actions of D-amphetamine and D-methamphetamine on the dopamine terminal.
Cho, AK; DiStefano, EW; Melega, WP; Schmitz, DA; Williams, AE, 1995
)
0.29
" The geometric mean plasma half-life was 11."( Pharmacokinetics of methamphetamine self-administered to human subjects by smoking S-(+)-methamphetamine hydrochloride.
Cook, CE; Hill, JM; Jeffcoat, AR; Patetta, PK; Perez-Reyes, M; Pugh, DE; Sadler, BM; White, WR,
)
0.13
" This study aimed at examining whether the plasma pharmacokinetic parameters of cabergoline and selegiline are modified when given in combination."( Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between the selective dopamine agonist cabergoline and the MAO-B inhibitor selegiline.
Bosc, M; Deffond, D; Dordain, G; Dostert, P; Fiorentini, F; La Croix, R; Persiani, S; Strolin Benedetti, M; Vernay, D, 1995
)
0.29
" No differences were found in the day-versus-night pharmacokinetic profile of dextromethamphetamine."( Chronopharmacokinetics and chronopharmacodynamics of dextromethamphetamine in man.
DeJohn, CA; Kearns, GL; Neri, DF; Shappell, SA; Valentine, JL, 1996
)
0.29
" As plasma levels of selegiline are very low and the elimination half-life is very short being about 9 minutes, therefore, a very sensitive and selective method for determining the 3 main metabolites desmethylselegiline (DMS), methamphetamine (MA) and amphetamine (A) was developed."( Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of the main metabolites of selegiline: desmethylselegiline, methamphetamine and amphetamine after oral administration of selegiline.
Kikuta, C; Ludwig, G; Mascher, HJ; Millendorfer, A; Schiel, H, 1997
)
0.3
" These pharmacokinetic changes were not due to the changes in the rate of MAP metabolism."( Effects of haloperidol and cocaine pretreatments on brain distribution and kinetics of [11C]methamphetamine in methamphetamine sensitized dog: application of PET to drug pharmacokinetic study.
Fujiwara, T; Funaki, Y; Hishinuma, T; Ido, T; Ishiwata, S; Itoh, M; Iwata, R; Mizugaki, M; Nakamura, H; Numachi, Y; Sato, M; Tomioka, Y; Yanai, K; Yoshida, S, 1997
)
0.3
" A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis was then used to relate these pharmacokinetic data to the results of previous microdialysis studies in which increases in extracellular dopamine were measured in the caudate-putamen after l-MeAmp (3-18 mg/kg) and after deprenyl (10 mg/kg)."( l-methamphetamine pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for assessment of in vivo deprenyl-derived l-methamphetamine.
Cho, AK; Kuczenski, R; Melega, WP; Schmitz, D; Segal, DS, 1999
)
0.3
" The pharmacokinetic profiles of selegiline and the metabolites were examined from serum samples for 24 hours (i."( Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of selegiline and desmethylselegiline suggest saturable tissue binding.
Anttila, M; Heinonen, E; Huupponen, R; Laine, K; Mäki-Ikola, O,
)
0.13
" One potentially critical issue relates to pharmacokinetic differences between the species."( Relevance of pharmacokinetic parameters in animal models of methamphetamine abuse.
Cho, AK; Kuczenski, R; Melega, WP; Segal, DS, 2001
)
0.31
" This result suggests the changes in the pharmacokinetic profile of MAP in the brain affect the development or expression of MAP-induced behavioral sensitization."( [Positron emission tomography (PET) study of the alterations in brain pharmacokinetics of methamphetamine in methamphetamine sensitized animals].
Nakamura, H, 2001
)
0.31
" Although numerous neuropsychopharmacological/neurochemical studies on behavioral sensitization were conducted, few reports are available to understand the pharmacokinetic aspect of METH, including the brain penetration of METH, in this phenomenon."( [Pharmacokinetic behavioral changes of methamphetamine in methamphetamine-sensitized animal model].
Hasegawa, T; Kitaichi, K; Morishita, Y, 2001
)
0.31
"Unlike oral contraceptives, HRT is not likely to have clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction with selegiline."( Effect of concomitant hormone replacement therapy containing estradiol and levonorgestrel on the pharmacokinetics of selegiline.
Anttila, M; Laine, K; Nyman, L; Palovaara, S, 2002
)
0.31
"Our studies examined pharmacokinetic mechanisms involved in high-affinity (K(d) approximately 11 nM) monoclonal antibody-based antagonism of (+)-methamphetamine-induced locomotor effects."( Pharmacodynamic mechanisms of monoclonal antibody-based antagonism of (+)-methamphetamine in rats.
Abraham, P; Byrnes-Blake, KA; Carroll, FI; Gentry, WB; Landes, RD; Laurenzana, EM; Owens, SM, 2003
)
0.32
"We developed a computer-controlled intravenous methamphetamine (METH) administration procedure (dynamic infusion), which enables us to compensate for an important pharmacokinetic difference between rats and humans by imposing a 12-h half-life for the drug in rats."( Human methamphetamine pharmacokinetics simulated in the rat: single daily intravenous administration reveals elements of sensitization and tolerance.
Kuczenski, R; Segal, DS, 2006
)
0.33
" The period of escalating doses (EDs) is likely associated with development of tolerance to aspects of METH's pharmacologic and toxic effects but the relative contributions of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors have not been well defined."( Escalating dose pretreatment induces pharmacodynamic and not pharmacokinetic tolerance to a subsequent high-dose methamphetamine binge.
Cho, AK; Kuczenski, R; Lacan, G; Melega, WP; O'Neil, ML; Segal, DS, 2006
)
0.33
" Pharmacokinetic calculations based on these measured values were used to estimate initial METH body burdens, the median value being 52 mg."( Methamphetamine blood concentrations in human abusers: application to pharmacokinetic modeling.
Cho, AK; Harvey, D; Laćan, G; Melega, WP, 2007
)
0.34
" The main pharmacokinetic parameters (C(max), t(max), t1/2beta, AUC(0-6), AUC(0-infinity)) have been calculated."( Pharmacokinetic studies of (-)-deprenyl and some of its metabolites in mouse.
Lengyel, J; Magyar, K; Szatmáry, I; Szebeni, G, 2007
)
0.34
" pharmacokinetic data on 670 drugs representing, to our knowledge, the largest publicly available set of human clinical pharmacokinetic data."( Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
Lombardo, F; Obach, RS; Waters, NJ, 2008
)
0.35
" At each dose, pharmacokinetic parameters for MDMA and its metabolites 3,4-dihydroxymethamphetamine (HHMA), 4-hydroxy-3-methoxymethamphetamine (HMMA), and 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine were determined."( Nonlinear pharmacokinetics of (+/-)3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, "Ecstasy") and its major metabolites in squirrel monkeys at plasma concentrations of MDMA that develop after typical psychoactive doses.
Maurer, HH; McCann, UD; Mueller, M; Peters, FT; Ricaurte, GA, 2008
)
0.35
"The primary aim of the current study is to test a possible pharmacokinetic explanation for the attenuated locomotor stimulation seen in adolescents."( Evaluation of a pharmacokinetic hypothesis for reduced locomotor stimulation from methamphetamine and cocaine in adolescent versus adult male C57BL/6J mice.
Gupta, T; Rhodes, JS; Zombeck, JA, 2009
)
0.35
" Developmental differences within the brain that effect pharmacodynamic properties of psychostimulants (e."( Evaluation of a pharmacokinetic hypothesis for reduced locomotor stimulation from methamphetamine and cocaine in adolescent versus adult male C57BL/6J mice.
Gupta, T; Rhodes, JS; Zombeck, JA, 2009
)
0.35
" Accordingly, to simulate the pharmacokinetic profile of a human METH binge exposure in rats, we used a computer-controlled, intravenous METH procedure (dynamic infusion, DI) to overcome species differences in METH pharmacokinetics and to replicate the human 12-h plasma METH half-life."( Human methamphetamine pharmacokinetics simulated in the rat: behavioral and neurochemical effects of a 72-h binge.
Kuczenski, R; Lacan, G; McCunney, SJ; Melega, WP; Segal, DS, 2009
)
0.35
" Herein we present the behavioral profile of PMMA, its hyperthermic potency and pharmacokinetic profile in rats."( Behavioral, hyperthermic and pharmacokinetic profile of para-methoxymethamphetamine (PMMA) in rats.
Balíková, M; Fujáková, M; Horáček, J; Höschl, C; Novák, T; Páleníček, T; Rohanová, M, 2011
)
0.37
" The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacodynamic effects of interactions caused by concomitants in MDMA tablets on extracellular dopamine and serotonin (5-HT) by microdialysis in the striatum of ethylcarbamate-anesthetized rats."( Pharmacodynamic interactions between MDMA and concomitants in MDMA tablets on extracellular dopamine and serotonin in the rat brain.
Fuchigami, Y; Igari, Y; Ikeda, R; Kuroda, N; Nakashima, K; Wada, M, 2011
)
0.37
" In each case, we estimated the time-course of blood methamphetamine after the self-administration in the suspects using a 2-compartment pharmacokinetic model with known pharmacokinetic parameters from the literatures."( Estimation of the duration after methamphetamine injection using a pharmacokinetic model in suspects who caused fatal traffic accidents.
Asari, M; Awaya, T; Maseda, C; Matsubara, K; Omura, T; Shimizu, K; Shiono, H; Sugawara, M; Suno, M; Tasaki, Y; Yamamoto, J, 2012
)
0.38
" We monitored pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variables for drugs and monoamines in the rat brain."( Warning against co-administration of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) with methamphetamine from the perspective of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluations in rat brain.
Kenichiro, N; Miki, K; Mitsuhiro, W; Naotaka, K; Rie, I; Yuki, F, 2013
)
0.39
"Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of methylone showed a correlation between plasma concentrations and enhancement of the locomotor activity."( An integrated pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of a new drug of abuse, methylone, a synthetic cathinone sold as "bath salts".
Camarasa, J; Carbó, Ml; Escubedo, E; López-Arnau, R; Martínez-Clemente, J; Pubill, D, 2013
)
0.39
" MDMA, and the associated pharmacodynamic consequences."( Nonlinear pharmacokinetics of (+/-)3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and its pharmacodynamic consequences in the rat.
Baumann, MH; Concheiro, M; Huestis, MA; Marrone, GF; Rothman, RB; Scheidweiler, KB, 2014
)
0.4
"Because methamphetamine (METH) pharmacokinetics after single iv doses show significant differences between male and female rats, we hypothesized that pharmacokinetic differences in METH disposition could be a contributing factor to the patterns of METH self-administration behaviors in rats."( The pharmacokinetics of methamphetamine self-administration in male and female rats.
Hambuchen, MD; McMillan, DE; Michael Owens, S; Milesi-Hallé, A, 2015
)
0.42
" Pharmacokinetic analysis, including predictive mathematical simulations of the data, was then conducted."( The pharmacokinetics of methamphetamine self-administration in male and female rats.
Hambuchen, MD; McMillan, DE; Michael Owens, S; Milesi-Hallé, A, 2015
)
0.42
" Linear regression analysis of predicted METH concentrations from pharmacokinetic simulations versus observed concentrations showed a substantially better correlation with male data than female data (r(2)=0."( The pharmacokinetics of methamphetamine self-administration in male and female rats.
Hambuchen, MD; McMillan, DE; Michael Owens, S; Milesi-Hallé, A, 2015
)
0.42
"Unlike METH male pharmacokinetic data, the female data was less predictable during multiple METH administrations and produced overall higher than expected METH concentrations."( The pharmacokinetics of methamphetamine self-administration in male and female rats.
Hambuchen, MD; McMillan, DE; Michael Owens, S; Milesi-Hallé, A, 2015
)
0.42
" The lack of pharmacological data on 3-MMC, prompted us to explore its pharmacokinetic profile as well as its effect on feeding behavior, weight gain, and serum biochemistry."( 3-Methyl-methcathinone: Pharmacokinetic profile evaluation in pigs in relation to pharmacodynamics.
Britzi, M; Edery, N; Nutt, D; Shimshoni, JA; Sobol, E; Willenz, U, 2015
)
0.42
"6-fold respectively, and the terminal elimination half-life increased 20-fold."( A Nanotechnology-Based Platform for Extending the Pharmacokinetic and Binding Properties of Anti-methamphetamine Antibody Fragments.
Gonzalez, GA; Nanaware-Kharade, N; Peterson, EC; Thakkar, S, 2015
)
0.42
"Generally, pharmacokinetic studies on 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) in blood have been performed after conjugate cleavage, without taking into account that phase II metabolites represent distinct chemical entities with their own effects and stereoselective pharmacokinetics."( Chiral Plasma Pharmacokinetics of 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine and its Phase I and II Metabolites following Controlled Administration to Humans.
Kraemer, T; Liechti, ME; Rickli, A; Schmid, Y; Schmidhauser, C; Steuer, AE, 2015
)
0.42
" A pharmacokinetic curve for the incurred phentermine was successfully produced using the described validated method."( Hematocrit-Independent Quantitation of Stimulants in Dried Blood Spots: Pipet versus Microfluidic-Based Volumetric Sampling Coupled with Automated Flow-Through Desorption and Online Solid Phase Extraction-LC-MS/MS Bioanalysis.
Henion, J; Verplaetse, R, 2016
)
0.43
" ScFv's have a short half-life due to their small size, limiting their clinical use."( PEGylation of a High-Affinity Anti-(+)Methamphetamine Single Chain Antibody Fragment Extends Functional Half-Life by Reducing Clearance.
Gonzalez, GA; Nanaware-Kharade, N; Owens, SM; Peterson, EC; Reichard, EE; Thakkar, S, 2016
)
0.43
" PEGylation of scFv7F9Cys did not alter METH binding functionality in vitro, and produced a 27-fold increase in the in vivo half-life of the antibody fragment."( PEGylation of a High-Affinity Anti-(+)Methamphetamine Single Chain Antibody Fragment Extends Functional Half-Life by Reducing Clearance.
Gonzalez, GA; Nanaware-Kharade, N; Owens, SM; Peterson, EC; Reichard, EE; Thakkar, S, 2016
)
0.43
"PEGylation of scFv7F9Cys significantly increase the functional half-life of scFv7F9Cys, suggesting it may be a long-lasting pharmacological treatment option for METH abuse."( PEGylation of a High-Affinity Anti-(+)Methamphetamine Single Chain Antibody Fragment Extends Functional Half-Life by Reducing Clearance.
Gonzalez, GA; Nanaware-Kharade, N; Owens, SM; Peterson, EC; Reichard, EE; Thakkar, S, 2016
)
0.43
" Several methods able to detect mephedrone have been reported, although to date, none have been applied to human pharmacokinetic studies in a controlled setting."( GC-MS Quantification Method for Mephedrone in Plasma and Urine: Application to Human Pharmacokinetics.
de la Torre, R; Farré, M; Olesti, E; Papaseit, E; Pérez-Mañá, C; Pozo, ÓJ; Pujadas, M, 2017
)
0.46
" However, plasma pharmacokinetic parameters of 10 mg/kg l-methamphetamine were ≥tenfold those of 1 mg/kg d-methamphetamine."( Psychomotor effect differences between l-methamphetamine and d-methamphetamine are independent of murine plasma and brain pharmacokinetics profiles.
Kosugi, Y; Muraoka, S; Nishimura, T; Takahata, K; Tanabe, T, 2017
)
0.46
" Parallel pharmacokinetic studies in the same monkeys determined plasma benzphetamine, d-methamphetamine and/or d-amphetamine levels for correlation with behavioral effects."( Role of d-amphetamine and d-methamphetamine as active metabolites of benzphetamine: Evidence from drug discrimination and pharmacokinetic studies in male rhesus monkeys.
Banks, ML; Fennell, TR; Negus, SS; Snyder, RW, 2017
)
0.46
" As such, the purpose of this study was to examine the pharmacokinetic profile of the 'bath salts' in a pregnancy model."( The pharmacokinetic profile of synthetic cathinones in a pregnancy model.
Brown, SD; Keasling, R; Kochelek, K; Pond, BB; Strange, LG, 2017
)
0.46
" The pharmacokinetic profiles of the synthetic cathinones vary based on the substitutions to the core scaffold."( A review of the influence of functional group modifications to the core scaffold of synthetic cathinones on drug pharmacokinetics.
Calinski, DM; Kisor, DF; Sprague, JE, 2019
)
0.51
"To provide a summary of the literature regarding the pharmacokinetic characteristics of the synthetic cathinones, with a focus on the impact of the structural modifications to the pharmacokinetics."( A review of the influence of functional group modifications to the core scaffold of synthetic cathinones on drug pharmacokinetics.
Calinski, DM; Kisor, DF; Sprague, JE, 2019
)
0.51
"In many, but not all, instances the pharmacokinetic characteristics of the synthetic cathinones can be reasonably predicted based on the substitutions to the core scaffold."( A review of the influence of functional group modifications to the core scaffold of synthetic cathinones on drug pharmacokinetics.
Calinski, DM; Kisor, DF; Sprague, JE, 2019
)
0.51
"Continued research will lead to a better understanding of the pharmacokinetic changes associated with structural modifications to the cathinone scaffold, and potentially in the long range, enhanced overdose and addiction therapy."( A review of the influence of functional group modifications to the core scaffold of synthetic cathinones on drug pharmacokinetics.
Calinski, DM; Kisor, DF; Sprague, JE, 2019
)
0.51
" Oral fluid (OF) has been successfully used as an alternative matrix for blood testing in several pharmacokinetic studies."( Pharmacokinetics of selegiline, R-methamphetamine, R-amphetamine, and desmethylselegiline in oral fluid after a single oral administration of selegiline.
Chen, L; Duan, G; Shen, B; Shi, Y; Wang, S; Xiang, P; Yan, H; Yu, Y, 2019
)
0.51
" The objectives of the current study were to describe drug and metabolite concentrations, develop an analytical method that could be used to regulate its use, and describe selected pharmacodynamic effects."( Detection, pharmacokinetics, and selected pharmacodynamic effects of methamphetamine following a single transmucosal and intravenous administration to exercised Thoroughbred horses.
Arthur, RM; Kanarr, KL; Kass, PH; Knych, HK; McKemie, DS, 2019
)
0.51
"The purpose of this research was to evaluate IXT-v100, given in combination with the adjuvant GLA-SE, to determine its efficacy in antagonizing methamphetamine disposition in a rat pharmacokinetic study."( Antibody production and pharmacokinetics of METH in rats following vaccination with the METH vaccine, IXT-v100, adjuvanted with GLA-SE.
Gunnell, MG; Owens, SM; Rüedi-Bettschen, D; Stevens, MW; Tawney, R; West, CM, 2019
)
0.51
"While BDL surgery produced significantly elevated alanine aminotransferase and bile duct proliferation in male compared to female rats, there were no significant interactions between sex and liver function in the pharmacokinetic parameters."( Effect of bile duct ligation-induced liver dysfunction on methamphetamine pharmacokinetics in male and female rats.
Berquist, MD; Findley, DL; Gorman, G; Hambuchen, MD; Jones, CB; Mazur, A; McGill, MR, 2020
)
0.56
" Compared to other psychostimulants, mephedrone showed rapid absorption (mean Tmax of 52."( Pharmacokinetics of Mephedrone and Its Metabolites in Whole Blood and Plasma after Controlled Intranasal Administration to Healthy Human Volunteers.
Abbate, V; Czerwinska, J; Dargan, PI; George, C; Kicman, AT; Parkin, MC, 2021
)
0.62
" In this study, we examine the pharmacokinetic interactions of the drug combination."( Pharmacokinetics of Synthetic Cathinones Found in Bath Salts in Mouse Brain and Plasma Using High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry.
Bouldin, JB; Brown, SD; Gearlds, C; McKinney, M; Pond, BB; Schreiner, S, 2021
)
0.62
"While serum half-life and unchanged methamphetamine urine clearance were unaffected by any radiation dose, maximum methamphetamine concentrations and methamphetamine and amphetamine metabolite area under the serum concentration-time curve values from 0 to 300 min were significantly reduced after 6 Gy radiation exposure."( Radiation Effects on Methamphetamine Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Rats.
Allard, FD; Blough, ER; Coward, L; Findley, DL; Gorman, G; Hambuchen, MD; Mazur, A; McGill, MR; Powers, A; Yee, EU, 2022
)
0.72

Compound-Compound Interactions

Study of club drug use among 450 gay and bisexual men. At least one class of PDE-5 (phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, sildenafil [Viagra] is used frequently in combination with club drugs such as methamphetamine, MDMA and ketamine.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"), but exerted a marked inhibition of muricide when combined with the above serotonin antagonists."( Anti-serotonin action in combination with noradrenaline-stimulating action is important for inhibiting muricide in midbrain raphe-lesioned rats.
Ohno, M; Takao, K; Ueki, S; Yamamoto, T, 1988
)
0.27
" The present study compared behavioral sensitization and drug conditioning between treatments with M combined with scopolamine (S) and M alone with respect to a reciprocal balance between the dopaminergic and inhibitory cholinergic systems in rats."( Behavioral responses induced by repeated treatment with methamphetamine alone and in combination with scopolamine in rats.
Miura, T; Yui, K, 1996
)
0.29
" We found that some antihistamines significantly potentiate methamphetamine-induced psychomotor activation in rats and that plasma and brain tissue concentrations of methamphetamine in rats treated with methamphetamine in combination with D-chlorpheniramine were markedly higher than those in rats treated with methamphetamine alone."( Drug interaction between methamphetamine and antihistamines: behavioral changes and tissue concentrations of methamphetamine in rats.
Goto, J; Hishinuma, T; Ito, Y; Iwabuchi, K; Kitaichi, K; Nakagawa, N; Okuda, T; Tsukamoto, H; Watanabe, T; Yanai, K, 2004
)
0.32
" We conducted this study in order to determine the safety (adverse events, mood changes, cardiovascular effects) and preliminary efficacy (subjective effects) of the AChE inhibitor rivastigmine (Riv) when tested in combination with Meth."( Evaluation of the cardiovascular and subjective effects of rivastigmine in combination with methamphetamine in methamphetamine-dependent human volunteers.
De La Garza, R; Newton, TF; Shoptaw, S, 2008
)
0.35
" GHB is frequently combined with other recreational drugs although these interactions are not well characterised."( Sedative and hypothermic effects of gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) in rats alone and in combination with other drugs: assessment using biotelemetry.
McGregor, IS; van Nieuwenhuijzen, PS, 2009
)
0.35
"Data ascertained in a study of club drug use among 450 gay and bisexual men indicate that at least one class of PDE-5 (phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, sildenafil [Viagra]) is used frequently in combination with club drugs such as methamphetamine, MDMA (3,4 methylenedioxymethamphetamine [ecstasy]), ketamine, cocaine, and GHB (gamma hydroxy butyrate)."( Sildenafil (Viagra) and club drug use in gay and bisexual men: the role of drug combinations and context.
Green, KA; Halkitis, PN, 2007
)
0.34
"A method of hollow fiber (HF) liquid phase microextraction (LPME) combined with gas chromatography (GC)-flame ionization detection (FID) was developed for the simultaneous quantification of trace amphetamine (AP), methamphetamine (MA), methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA), methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), caffeine and ketamine (KT) in drug abuser urine samples."( Simultaneous quantification of amphetamines, caffeine and ketamine in urine by hollow fiber liquid phase microextraction combined with gas chromatography-flame ionization detector.
Chen, J; He, M; Hu, B; Xiong, J, 2010
)
0.36
" The STR was mimicked in mice treated with BD 1047 (a putative σ(1) receptor antagonist), but not SM-21, a putative σ(2) receptor antagonist, in combination with METH."( Straub tail reaction in mice treated with σ(1) receptor antagonist in combination with methamphetamine.
Hall, FS; Kitanaka, J; Kitanaka, N; Nishiyama, N; Takemura, M; Tanaka, K; Uhl, GR, 2012
)
0.38
" The aim of the study is to investigate the effects of MBRP combined with VRCE, in comparison to MBRP alone or treatment as usual, on craving and emotional responses in people with methamphetamine use disorders."( Mindfulness-based relapse prevention combined with virtual reality cue exposure for methamphetamine use disorder: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Chen, XJ; Li, YH; Pauli, P; Sui, N; Wang, DM; Winkler, M; Zhou, LD, 2018
)
0.48
" Three parallel groups will receive 8 weeks of MBRP combined with VRCE, MBRP alone, or treatment as usual, respectively."( Mindfulness-based relapse prevention combined with virtual reality cue exposure for methamphetamine use disorder: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Chen, XJ; Li, YH; Pauli, P; Sui, N; Wang, DM; Winkler, M; Zhou, LD, 2018
)
0.48
"This innovative study aims at investigating the effects of MBRP combined with VRCE in people with SUD."( Mindfulness-based relapse prevention combined with virtual reality cue exposure for methamphetamine use disorder: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Chen, XJ; Li, YH; Pauli, P; Sui, N; Wang, DM; Winkler, M; Zhou, LD, 2018
)
0.48
" Synthetic cathinones are frequently consumed in combination with other drugs of abuse."( Bath salts and polyconsumption: in search of drug-drug interactions.
Lopez-Rodriguez, AB; Viveros, MP, 2019
)
0.51
"The study found that the intervention of tDCS over DLPFC combined with CCAT may have potential benefit in improving treatment outcome in patients with MUD."( The transcranial direct current stimulation over prefrontal cortex combined with the cognitive training reduced the cue-induced craving in female individuals with methamphetamine use disorder: A randomized controlled trial.
Chen, L; Chen, T; Ding, X; Ji, J; Jiang, H; Li, X; Shi, W; Su, H; Xu, X; Ye, Y; Zhao, M; Zhong, N, 2021
)
0.62

Bioavailability

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) was used in conjunction with [(11)C]d-methamphetamine to measure its whole-body distribution and bioavailability. The bioavailability of smoked methamphetamine was 90%. The absence of significant differences between Caucasians and African Americans suggests that variables other than methamphetamine pharmacokinetics and bio availability account for the lower abuse prevalence in African Americans.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" From these results, Y-20024, pharmacologically similar to SPR, but superior in bioavailability and penetration through the blood brain barrier, may have potential usefulness as an antipsychotic drug."( [Neuroleptic properties of Y-20024, a new benzofurancarboxamide derivative].
Fukuda, T; Morimoto, T; Morimoto, Y; Murakami, S; Setoguchi, M; Shoji, H; Tahara, T, 1989
)
0.28
" The bioavailability of smoked methamphetamine was 90."( Pharmacokinetics of methamphetamine self-administered to human subjects by smoking S-(+)-methamphetamine hydrochloride.
Cook, CE; Hill, JM; Jeffcoat, AR; Patetta, PK; Perez-Reyes, M; Pugh, DE; Sadler, BM; White, WR,
)
0.13
"An open-label, four-way crossover, single dose pharmacokinetic study comparing the bioavailability of 10 mg selegiline hydrochloride administered to healthy young males as a solution by the oral route (in the stomach) and by a nasoenteric tube to the following three sites: duodenum, jejunum and terminal ileum was conducted."( Absorption and presystemic metabolism of selegiline hydrochloride at different regions in the gastrointestinal tract in healthy males.
Barrett, JS; De Witt, KE; Ireland, J; Morales, RJ; Rajewski, G; Rohatagi, S; Szego, P, 1996
)
0.29
"The bioavailability of two selegiline HCl (CAS 14611-52-0) tablet products was compared in a single-blind, single-dose, randomised, two-way, cross-over study with 25 healthy volunteers."( Bioavailability of two selegiline hydrochloride tablet products.
Duursema, L; Groenewoud, G; Hundt, HK; Joubert, A; Middle, MV; Muir, AR; Müller, FO; Schall, R; Swart, KJ, 1996
)
0.29
"A bioavailability study of 2 different selegiline preparations were conducted in 20 healthy volunteers to test the bioequivalence."( Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of the main metabolites of selegiline: desmethylselegiline, methamphetamine and amphetamine after oral administration of selegiline.
Kikuta, C; Ludwig, G; Mascher, HJ; Millendorfer, A; Schiel, H, 1997
)
0.3
" Relatively little has been reported about the bioavailability of methamphetamine when smoked or used intranasally."( The bioavailability of intranasal and smoked methamphetamine.
Boxenbaum, H; Everhart, ET; Harris, DS; Jones, RT; Mendelson, JE; Sequeira, G, 2003
)
0.32
" Plasma and urine concentrations were measured for calculation of bioavailability and other pharmacokinetic parameters by noncompartmental methods."( The bioavailability of intranasal and smoked methamphetamine.
Boxenbaum, H; Everhart, ET; Harris, DS; Jones, RT; Mendelson, JE; Sequeira, G, 2003
)
0.32
"Methamphetamine was well absorbed after smoking or intranasal administration, with bioavailabilities of 79% after intranasal administration and 67% of the estimated delivered dose or 37."( The bioavailability of intranasal and smoked methamphetamine.
Boxenbaum, H; Everhart, ET; Harris, DS; Jones, RT; Mendelson, JE; Sequeira, G, 2003
)
0.32
" Bioavailability was determined using AUC and peak plasma concentrations (C(max))."( A new formulation of selegiline: improved bioavailability and selectivity for MAO-B inhibition.
Brewer, F; Clarke, A; Corn, TH; Hartig, F; Johnson, ES; Mallard, N; Taylor, S, 2003
)
0.32
" The mechanisms underlying tolerance are not understood but clearly involve more than alterations in drug bioavailability or reductions in the hyperthermia caused by methamphetamine."( Attenuated microglial activation mediates tolerance to the neurotoxic effects of methamphetamine.
Kuhn, DM; Thomas, DM, 2005
)
0.33
" (-)-Deprenyl is well absorbed after oral and parental treatment."( Pharmacokinetic studies of (-)-deprenyl and some of its metabolites in mouse.
Lengyel, J; Magyar, K; Szatmáry, I; Szebeni, G, 2007
)
0.34
"Plasma l-methamphetamine levels were often below the level of quantification so bioavailability was estimated by comparing urinary excretion of the intravenous and inhaled doses, yielding delivered dose estimates of 74."( The clinical pharmacology of intranasal l-methamphetamine.
Everhart, T; Foster, E; Harris, DS; Jacob, P; Jones, RT; McGlothlin, D; Mendelson, JE, 2008
)
0.35
" The absence of significant differences between Caucasians and African Americans suggests that variables other than methamphetamine pharmacokinetics and bioavailability account for the lower abuse prevalence in African Americans."( Fast uptake and long-lasting binding of methamphetamine in the human brain: comparison with cocaine.
Alexoff, D; Apelskog, K; Carter, P; Fowler, JS; Hubbard, B; Jayne, M; King, P; Kriplani, A; Logan, J; Ma, Y; Muench, L; Pradhan, K; Schlyer, D; Shea, C; Telang, F; Volkow, ND; Wang, GJ; Warner, D; Wong, C; Xu, Y, 2008
)
0.35
" However, the poor bioavailability of SB-277011A has limited its potential use in humans."( PG01037, a novel dopamine D3 receptor antagonist, inhibits the effects of methamphetamine in rats.
Gardner, EL; Grundt, P; Higley, AE; Kiefer, SW; Newman, AH; Spiller, K; Xi, ZX, 2011
)
0.37
"Positron Emission Tomography (PET) was used in conjunction with [(11)C]d-methamphetamine to measure its whole-body distribution and bioavailability as assessed by peak uptake (% Dose/cc), rate of clearance (time to reach 50% peak-clearance) and accumulation (area under the curve) in healthy participants (9 Caucasians and 10 African Americans)."( Distribution and pharmacokinetics of methamphetamine in the human body: clinical implications.
Alexoff, D; Fowler, JS; Shumay, E; Telang, F; Thanos, PK; Volkow, ND; Wang, GJ, 2010
)
0.36
" Absolute bioavailability was about 80% and the percentage of methylone protein binding was of 30%."( An integrated pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of a new drug of abuse, methylone, a synthetic cathinone sold as "bath salts".
Camarasa, J; Carbó, Ml; Escubedo, E; López-Arnau, R; Martínez-Clemente, J; Pubill, D, 2013
)
0.39
" The absolute bioavailability of mephedrone was about 10% and the percentage of mephedrone protein binding was 21."( Mephedrone pharmacokinetics after intravenous and oral administration in rats: relation to pharmacodynamics.
Camarasa, J; Carbó, M; Escubedo, E; López-Arnau, R; Martínez-Clemente, J; Pubill, D, 2013
)
0.39
" A pharmacokinetic study of compound 1 in vivo revealed good bioavailability and brain penetration in rats."( Discovery of N-sulfonyl-7-azaindoline derivatives as potent, orally available and selective M(4) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor agonists.
Enomoto, T; Kitamura, A; Kiyoshi, A; Konishi, Y; Matsuda, H; Nakako, T; Ochi, Y; Sakai, M; Sumiyoshi, T; Suwa, A; Takai, K; Uematsu, Y; Uruno, Y, 2014
)
0.4
" To enhance the bioavailability of melatonin, we applied liposomal melatonin."( Liposomal melatonin rescues methamphetamine-elicited mitochondrial burdens, pro-apoptosis, and dopaminergic degeneration through the inhibition PKCδ gene.
Cho, HJ; Dang, DK; Hong, JS; Jang, CG; Jeong, JH; Kim, HC; Lee, J; Lee, JC; Nabeshima, T; Nam, Y; Nguyen, TT; Nguyen, XK; Park, DH; Shin, EJ, 2015
)
0.42
" The bioavailability was about 7%."( 3-Methyl-methcathinone: Pharmacokinetic profile evaluation in pigs in relation to pharmacodynamics.
Britzi, M; Edery, N; Nutt, D; Shimshoni, JA; Sobol, E; Willenz, U, 2015
)
0.42
"Adsorption/desorption and desorption hysteresis of methamphetamine (MMA) on carbon nanotubes (CNTs) as well as bioavailability of MMA were studied in simulated gastrointestinal fluids and background fluids."( Adsorption/desorption and bioavailability of methamphetamine in simulated gastrointestinal fluids under the presence of multiwalled carbon nanotubes.
Wang, L; Xiong, Z; Zhang, J; Zhang, K, 2015
)
0.42
" It is well absorbed following different routes of administration and distributed throughout the body."( Methamphetamine-induced toxicity: The role of autophagy?
Karimi, G; Roohbakhsh, A; Shirani, K, 2016
)
0.43
" The method has been successfully applied to biological samples obtained from a pilot clinical trial intended to evaluate the human pharmacology of mephedrone and its relative bioavailability and pharmacokinetics."( GC-MS Quantification Method for Mephedrone in Plasma and Urine: Application to Human Pharmacokinetics.
de la Torre, R; Farré, M; Olesti, E; Papaseit, E; Pérez-Mañá, C; Pozo, ÓJ; Pujadas, M, 2017
)
0.46
" The present study aimed to examine whether intranasal (IN) insulin treatment with high CNS bioavailability and minimal systemic side effects, can reverse the anxiety-like behavior and neuroinflammation induced by repeated MA administration."( Intranasal insulin treatment alleviates methamphetamine induced anxiety-like behavior and neuroinflammation.
Ahmadiani, A; Beirami, E; Dargahi, L; Oryan, S; Seyedhosseini Tamijani, SM, 2017
)
0.46
"The Met-allele of the COMT Val158Met polymorphism slows metabolism and increases bioavailability of dopamine (DA) in the prefrontal cortex compared to the Val-allele."( COMT val158met genotype alters the effects of methamphetamine dependence on dopamine and dopamine-related executive function: preliminary findings.
Cherner, M; Ellis, RJ; Iudicello, JE; Kumar, A; Letendre, SL; Saloner, R; Sundermann, EE; Watson, CW, 2020
)
0.56

Dosage Studied

Methamphetamine and cocaine increased locomotor activity in a dose-response fashion. The magnitude of the increase was less in adolescents than adults. MDMA and PMA showed the steepest slope for the doses used.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" Of the 40 unknown drug dosage form powders supplied to 10 collaborators, 39 were correctly identified."( Microcrystalline identification test of some amphetamines and hydrochlorothiazide: collaborative study.
Auerbach, L, 1978
)
0.26
" Maximal effective dosage of THC was 15 mg/kg with higer dosages of 30 and 60 mg/kg producing a decrease from maximum in locomotor activity."( Stimulant actions of delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol in mice.
Brown, DJ; Evans, MA; Forney, RB; Harbison, RD, 1976
)
0.26
" Dosage of each drug used in this experiment was calculated by determining the dosage which caused the same degree of muscle relaxation and sedative action in mice (see, Fig."( [Conditioning of emotional behavior originating at the hypothalamus. (2) Effects of drugs on conflict-induced behavior models].
Abe, Y; Mineo, K; Yanaura, S, 1976
)
0.26
" The maximum level of concentration in the blood was seen within 4 hr after administration of Li2CO3, and a greater part of the orally dosed Li2CO3 was excreted into the urine."( [Pharmacokinetics and general pharmacological actions of lithium salts administered singly or repeatedly].
Aihara, H; Akiyama, F; Nozu, T; Ozawa, H; Sasajima, M, 1976
)
0.26
" In the dosage used the vasoconstrictive effect of methamphetamine was altogether only somewhat more expressed."( [Clinical-pharmacological studies on the effect of mephentermin and methamphetamine on the hemodynamics of the lung circulation].
Förster, W; Kneehans, S; Krause, M; Mährlein, W; Sziegoleit, W, 1975
)
0.25
"Pretreatment of rats with a dosage regimen of alphaMT that has no effect on the anorectic action of a single dose of 2 mg/kg of d-amphetamine or methamphetamine causes a marked reduction in the rate of continuous avoidance responding evoked by that same dose."( Differential effects of alphaMT on anorectic and stimulatory action of amphetamines.
Cox, RH; Maickel, RP, 1975
)
0.25
" The glucuronide conjugates, (+-)-N-hydroxymethyl-N-(1-methyl-3,3-diphenylpropyl)formamide glucuronide, (+-)-N-methyl-N-[1-methyl-3-(4'-hydroxyphenyl)-3-phenylpropyl]formamide glucuronide, and (+-)-N-methyl-N-[1-methyl-3-(4'-hydroxy-3'-methoxyphenyl)-3- phenylpropyl]formamide glucuronide were isolated from the bile of rats dosed with the parent compound."( Isolation and characterization of carbinolamide and phenolic glucuronide conjugates of (+-)-N-methyl-N-(1-methyl-3,3-diphenylpropyl) formamide and N-formylmethamphetamine by FAB/MS, LC/MS/MS, and NMR.
Abbott, FS; Mutlib, AE,
)
0.13
"250 mg/kg) was used, the maximum plasma concentration of methamphetamine-d3 was slightly but significantly greater when the test dose was given at the end of the oral dosing period than when it was given at the beginning."( Pharmacokinetics of oral methamphetamine and effects of repeated daily dosing in humans.
Cook, CE; Hill, JM; Jeffcoat, AR; Perez-Reyes, M; Pugh, DE; Sadler, BM; Voyksner, RD; White, WR,
)
0.13
" It was considered that the decedent had used methamphetamine for about 18 months and that the dosage of the drug used for the last 10 days or so was relatively large though he had discontinued injecting the drug for 3-5 days."( Presumption of a history of methamphetamine abuse by postmortem analyses of hair and nails: a case report.
Ishizu, H; Miyaishi, S; Moriya, F, 1992
)
0.28
" Lewis rats (n = 7 or 8) were dosed with methoxyphenamine with and without prior administration of various doses of either quinine or its diastereomer quinidine."( Quinine is a more potent inhibitor than quinidine in rat of the oxidative metabolic routes of methoxyphenamine which involve debrisoquine 4-hydroxylase.
Hawes, EM; McKay, G; Midha, KK; Muralidharan, G, 1991
)
0.28
" Both 23390 and raclopride, which were used at low dosage (0."( Antagonism of EEGraphic and behavioural effects of methamphetamine by selective receptor blockers (SCH 23390 and raclopride) in the rabbit.
Albergati, A; Bo, P; Dallocchio, C; Marchioni, E; Savoldi, F, 1991
)
0.28
" In rats that had been injected with MDMA on a daily basis either before or after the milk-drinking sessions, the dose-response function of MDMA was shifted to the right, indicating that tolerance had developed."( Tolerance and cross-tolerance to 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), methamphetamine and methylenedioxyamphetamine.
Virus, RM; Woolverton, WL; Zacny, JP, 1990
)
0.28
" In slices from methamphetamine-treated rats, the dose-response curve for the dopamine hyperpolarization was shifted to the left of that seen in neurones from control rats by a factor of approximately 100."( Enhancement of dopamine actions on rat nucleus accumbens neurones in vitro after methamphetamine pre-treatment.
Higashi, H; Inanaga, K; Nishi, S; Uchimura, N, 1989
)
0.28
" Significant decreases were still present in many brain areas on the same dosage schedule 30 days after drug administration."( Effects of high-dose methamphetamine administration on serotonin uptake sites in rat brain measured using [3H]cyanoimipramine autoradiography.
Aronson, CE; Brunswick, DJ; Kovachich, GB, 1989
)
0.28
" Lewis and Dark Agouti (DA) rat strains (n = 4), models of human extensive and poor metabolizer phenotypes of debrisoquine/sparteine, respectively, were dosed with methoxyphenamine with and without prior administration of quinidine."( Selective in vivo inhibition by quinidine of methoxyphenamine oxidation in rat models of human debrisoquine polymorphism.
Hawes, EM; Inaba, T; McKay, G; Midha, KK; Muralidharan, G, 1989
)
0.28
"Chronic administration of caffeine to mice (1 mg/ml in drinking water X 14 d) led to a downward shift in the dose-response curve for the locomotor effects of caffeine."( Cross-tolerance studies between caffeine and (-)-N6-(phenylisopropyl)-adenosine (PIA) in mice.
Ahlijanian, MK; Takemori, AE, 1986
)
0.27
" The dosage of MV-GABA which caused locomotor hypoactivity produced an impairment of the rotarod performance."( [Behavioral pharmacological action of Ca-4-(3,5-dihydroxy-3-methylpenthylamido) butyrate (mevalonic GABA, MV-GABA)].
Kameyama, T; Nabeshima, T; Noda, Y, 1987
)
0.27
" All three drugs disrupted performance during both the initial dose-response determination as well as during the redetermination following the regimen."( Effects of dopaminergic agents on eye tracking before and after repeated methamphetamine.
Ando, K; Johanson, CE; Schuster, CR, 1986
)
0.27
" Tolerance to MA, increased sensitivity to HAL and no consistent sensitivity change to APO were observed when dose-response functions were redetermined starting 1 month after the repeated MA administration."( Sensitivity changes to dopaminergic agents in fine motor control of rhesus monkeys after repeated methamphetamine administration.
Ando, K; Johanson, CE; Schuster, CR; Seiden, LS, 1985
)
0.27
" There did not appear to be a dose-response relation."( LSD and genetic damage.
Dishotsky, NI; Lipscomb, WR; Loughman, WD; Mogar, RE, 1971
)
0.25
" Dose-response curves were constructed for amino-oxyacetic acid and gamma-acetylenic GABA."( Blockade of methamphetamine-induced depression of tyrosine hydroxylase by GABA transaminase inhibitors.
Gibb, JW; Hotchkiss, A, 1980
)
0.26
" From these data, significant differences of the pharmacological effects between oral and rectal administration of bromazepam were recognized in the duration of action and, in part, potencies; and therefore, rectal administration of bromazepam may be a useful dosage form for clinical use."( [Pharmacological action of bromazepam suppository].
Aida, Y; Fujii, Y; Gomita, Y; Goto, M; Ichimaru, Y; Kasama, T; Mayuzumi, K; Mayuzumi, Y; Moriyama, M, 1983
)
0.27
" Distribution of methamphetamine and the major metabolite in tissues during multiple dosing was investigated; accumulation occurred in brain, liver, testis and fat."( Distribution and excretion of methamphetamine and its metabolites in rats. II. Time-course of concentration in blood and distribution after multiple oral administration.
Kimura, R; Murata, T; Niwaguchi, T; Sakai, T, 1983
)
0.27
" Dose-response curves for d-MA (0."( Altered sensitivity to d-methylamphetamine, apomorphine, and haloperidol in rhesus monkeys depleted of caudate dopamine by repeated administration of d-methylamphetamine.
Finnegan, KT; Ricaurte, G; Schuster, CR; Seiden, LS, 1982
)
0.26
" Maximal response rates for NPA were about 1/2 of that of A, NMA and NEA, and the dose-response curve was shifted to the right of these compounds by about 4 times."( Structure-activity relationships among some d-N-alkylated amphetamines.
Johanson, CE; Shybut, G; Woolverton, WL, 1980
)
0.26
" This methylamphetamine treatment also attenuated the ability of methylamphetamine and apomorphine to produce increases in locomotor activity without shifting the dose-response curve to the right or left."( The effects of dopaminergic agents on the locomotor activity of rats after high doses of methylamphetamine.
Lucot, JB; Schuster, CR; Seiden, LS; Wagner, GC, 1980
)
0.26
" In the present study, we have used receptor autoradiographic studies of [125I]RTI-55 labeled serotonin (5-HT) uptake sites to evaluate the effect of a two dosing schedule (5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg x 4) of METH on striatal 5-HT uptake sites in nontransgenic (Non-Tg), heterozygous (Hetero) and homozygous (Homo) SOD-Tg mice."( Methamphetamine-induced serotonin neurotoxicity is mediated by superoxide radicals.
Cadet, JL; Epstein, C; Hirata, H; Ladenheim, B; Rothman, RB, 1995
)
0.29
" In the case of microinjection of GABA into either one of the brain regions, only the larger dosage (27,000 nmol) significantly reduced the MAP-induced hyperactivity, whereas this inhibition was less than that seen at the dose of 540 nmol of GABA-peptides."( Inhibitory effects of newly synthesized Ser-contained GABA-peptides administered into either caudate putamen or amygdala on methamphetamine-induced hyperactivity.
Hori, Y; Ohnishi, M; Sakurai, K; Shibuya, T; Watanabe, Y; Yato, M, 1995
)
0.29
" (iv) While multiple dosing and pregnancy did not alter either the urinary recovery or profile of the metabolites detected, there was a linear decrease in the MPA:ODMP ratio during gestation."( The influence of pregnancy on the biotransformation and urinary excretion of methoxyphenamine in mice.
Buttar, HS; Cyr, TD; Foster, BC; Moffatt, J; Wilson, DL, 1995
)
0.29
" This indicates that the protective effects of MK-801 on MA-induced dopaminergic terminal degeneration varies among animals with complete protection in most animals and partial protection in the others using the present doses and dosing regimen."( Protective effects of MK-801 on methamphetamine-induced depletion of dopaminergic and serotonergic terminals and striatal astrocytic response: an immunohistochemical study.
Pu, C; Vorhees, CV, 1995
)
0.29
" Four subjects used the inhaler as recommended by the manufacturer for five consecutive days; two subjects used double this dosage for three consecutive days."( Response of EMIT amphetamine immunoassays to urinary desoxyephedrine following Vicks inhaler use.
Moore, KA; Poklis, A, 1995
)
0.29
"Deprenyl (DPN) and its metabolites, desmethyl deprenyl (desmethyl DPN), methamphetamine (MA) and amphetamine (AP), in the hair of rats and humans dosed with DPN were analyzed by selected ion monitoring of gas chromatograph-mass spectrometry (GC-MS-SIM)."( Hair analysis for drugs of abuse. IX. Comparison of deprenyl use and methamphetamine use by hair analysis.
Kikura, R; Nakahara, Y, 1995
)
0.29
" The assay exhibits a dose-response of approximately 90,000 dpm from 0 to 1000 ng/mL of D-amphetamine or D-methamphetamine with a minimum detectable dose for either drug of approximately 25 ng/mL."( 125I radioimmunoassay for the dual detection of amphetamine and methamphetamine.
McNally, AJ; Rusyniak, D; Salamone, SJ; Ward, C, 1994
)
0.29
" The drug excreted into beard was detected 10 approximately 12 days for a single dose and 12-14 days for 7 doses after the last dosage at the cut off level of 1 ng/mg."( Hair analysis for drugs of abuse. VI. The excretion of methoxyphenamine and methamphetamine into beards of human subjects.
Konuma, K; Nakahara, Y; Takahashi, K, 1993
)
0.29
" Methamphetamine alone at this dosage was not hepatotoxic."( Methamphetamine potentiation of carbon tetrachloride hepatotoxicity in mice.
Harbison, RD; James, RC; Roberts, SM, 1994
)
0.29
" Reducing the ET to 4 degrees C during dosing decreased the peak and average DA levels attained during the 4 x 5 mg/kg METH administration to about 50% of that observed at a 23 degrees C ET."( Effects of a cold environment or age on methamphetamine-induced dopamine release in the caudate putamen of female rats.
Bowyer, JF; Gough, B; Holson, RR; Lipe, GW; Newport, GD; Slikker, W, 1993
)
0.29
" The present study was designed to determine if MA could decrease neural and peripheral GR when administered to adrenal-intact rats using a neurotoxic dosing regimen which produces depletions of brain DA and 5-HT levels."( Methamphetamine-induced decrease in neural glucocorticoid receptors: relationship to monoamine levels.
Lowy, MT; Novotney, S, 1994
)
0.29
" Cumulative dosing tests for the discriminative stimulus properties consisted of two to five trials of FR20 schedule; responses for both levers were reinforced."( [Discriminative stimulus properties of ephedra herb (Ephedra sinica) in rats].
Furuya, I; Watanabe, S, 1993
)
0.29
" Animals were dosed with PCP (15 mg/kg, ip) its congener (+) MK-801 (0."( Drug-induced circling preference in rats. Correlation with monoamine levels.
Ali, SF; Gough, B; Kordsmeier, KJ,
)
0.13
" A total of 214 urine specimens were collected either prior to dosing or at each micturition for a 12-h period post dose."( GC-MS determination of amphetamine and methamphetamine in human urine for 12 hours following oral administration of dextro-methamphetamine: lack of evidence supporting the established forensic guidelines for methamphetamine confirmation.
DeJohn, CA; Kearns, GL; Letzig, LG; Neri, DF; Shappell, SA; Sparks, C; Valentine, CR; Valentine, JL,
)
0.13
" In the present study, dose-response effects of acute administration of these stimulants on preproenkephalin (PPE) mRNA expression in the rat striatum were investigated with quantitative in situ hybridization histochemistry 3 h after injection."( D1 and D2 receptor regulation of preproenkephalin and preprodynorphin mRNA in rat striatum following acute injection of amphetamine or methamphetamine.
McGinty, JF; Wang, JQ, 1996
)
0.29
"1 mg/kg dosage was accompanied by a locomotor change of a lesser degree and shorter duration."( Effects of acute methamphetamine administration on spacing in paired rats: investigation with an automated video-analysis method.
Andow, Y; Cao, GM; Hoshino, T; Mugishima, G; Shinba, T; Yamamoto, K, 1996
)
0.29
" The clinical sensitivity and specificity of the overall analysis system (sweat collection and analysis) were 85 and 100%, respectively, using known methamphetamine dosing of volunteers (10, 20, and 25 mg) as the reference standard."( Detection of methamphetamine in sweat by EIA and GC-MS.
Fay, J; Fogerson, R; Niedbala, RS; Schoendorfer, D; Spiehler, V, 1996
)
0.29
" While both AMP and MET exposure was equivalent at all dosing sites, DMS exposure was less (approximately 18%) at the terminal ileum."( Absorption and presystemic metabolism of selegiline hydrochloride at different regions in the gastrointestinal tract in healthy males.
Barrett, JS; De Witt, KE; Ireland, J; Morales, RJ; Rajewski, G; Rohatagi, S; Szego, P, 1996
)
0.29
" AMP and MET metabolites were insensitive to dosing site consistent with their hepatic formation."( Absorption and presystemic metabolism of selegiline hydrochloride at different regions in the gastrointestinal tract in healthy males.
Barrett, JS; De Witt, KE; Ireland, J; Morales, RJ; Rajewski, G; Rohatagi, S; Szego, P, 1996
)
0.29
" These results indicate that in vervet monkey striatum, an acute Amp or MeAmp drug dosage produces extensive striatal dopamine system neurotoxicity."( Recovery of striatal dopamine function after acute amphetamine- and methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity in the vervet monkey.
Huang, SC; Lacan, G; Melega, WP; Phelps, ME; Raleigh, MJ; Stout, DB, 1997
)
0.3
" The sole recommended dosing regimen is 5 mg given in the morning and at noon with breakfast and lunch."( Pharmacokinetic evaluation of a selegiline pulsatile oral delivery system.
Barrett, JS; DeWitt, KE; Lessard, D; Morales, RJ; Rohatagi, S, 1997
)
0.3
" In a second experiment, mice were dosed according to the same paradigm and were perfused at 18 h after treatment for immunohistochemical analysis."( Methamphetamine-induced hyperthermia in mice: examination of dopamine depletion and heat-shock protein induction.
Ali, SF; Freyaldenhoven, TE; Kuperman, DI; Schmued, LC, 1997
)
0.3
" Lorazepam is more likely to require repeat dosing than droperidol."( Methamphetamine toxicity: treatment with a benzodiazepine versus a butyrophenone.
Derlet, RW; Duncan, DR; Richards, JR, 1997
)
0.3
" Further, to investigate the NIE of methamphetamine, the dose-response relations to isoproterenol, histamine, and calcium were measured with or without methamphetamine (2 x 10(-4) M), after adrenergic neuronal blockade with reserpine."( Biphasic inotropic effects of methamphetamine and methylphenidate on ferret papillary muscles.
Ishiguro, Y; Morgan, JP, 1997
)
0.3
" The ACh dose-response curve was shifted to the left and to the right after treatment with 1 and 100 microM MeAMPH, respectively, suggesting that MeAMPH potentiated or inhibited ACh-evoked currents by a change in the affinity for ACh."( Methamphetamine modulates ACh-evoked currents in Xenopus occytes expressing the rat alpha7 receptors.
Nishizaki, T; Nomura, T, 1997
)
0.3
" MPTP-treated mice maintained at 4 degrees C demonstrated (1) a greater hypothermic response, (2) a significant reduction in striatal DA content and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) activity, and (3) significantly greater striatal 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium (MPP+) levels, as compared to mice dosed with MPTP at room temperature."( Lowering ambient or core body temperature elevates striatal MPP+ levels and enhances toxicity to dopamine neurons in MPTP-treated mice.
Albers, DS; Moy, LY; Sonsalla, PK, 1998
)
0.3
" Consequently, the major goal of these studies was to determine whether a monoclonal antibody Fab fragment (of IgG) could be used as an effective drug class-selective antagonist and to understand better the dose-response relationships for reversing CNS drug toxicity."( Pharmacodynamics of a monoclonal antiphencyclidine Fab with broad selectivity for phencyclidine-like drugs.
Hardin, JS; Owens, SM; Proksch, JW; Wessinger, WD, 1998
)
0.3
" These present data clearly demonstrate that METH dosing leads to significant alterations in liver and blood SAM and that these changes in SAM levels correlate with changes in striatal dopamine levels."( Methamphetamine treatment affects blood and liver S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) in mice. Correlation with dopamine depletion in the striatum.
Ali, SF; Cooney, CA; Poirier, LA; Wise, CK, 1998
)
0.3
" To examine the effect of supplementing energy metabolism on METH-induced dopamine content depletions, the striatum was perfused directly with decylubiquinone or nicotinamide to enhance the energetic capacity of the tissue during or after a neurotoxic dosing regimen of METH."( Substrates of energy metabolism attenuate methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity in striatum.
Douglas, AJ; Lust, WD; Stephans, SE; Whittingham, TS; Yamamoto, BK, 1998
)
0.3
" Lorazepam is more likely to require repeat dosing than droperidol."( Chemical restraint for the agitated patient in the emergency department: lorazepam versus droperidol.
Derlet, RW; Duncan, DR; Richards, JR,
)
0.13
" Dose-response curves for each drug, conducted at each drug's t1/2, indicated considerable differences in potency (EC50) at stimulating [3H]MPP+ release from C6-hSERT cells [3beta-(4-iodophenyl)tropane-2beta-carboxylic acid methyl ester (RTI-55) > imipramine > 1-[2-diphenylmethoxy]ethyl-4-(3-phenylpropyl)-piperazine (GBR-12935) threo-(+/-)-methylphenidate > cocaine > mazindol > 2-beta-carbomethoxy-3beta-(4-fluorophenyl)tropane (CFT) > (+)methamphetamine > amphetamine > DA > fenfluramine > norepinephrine (NE) > 5-HT]."( [3H]substrate- and cell-specific effects of uptake inhibitors on human dopamine and serotonin transporter-mediated efflux.
Eshleman, AJ; Janowsky, A; Johnson, RA; Meyers, T; Neve, KA, 1998
)
0.3
" With the same dosing schedule, methamphetamine induces HSP72 expression in both cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions of the striatum, cerebellum and hippocampus."( Microgliosis and down-regulation of adenosine transporter induced by methamphetamine in rats.
Camarasa, J; Camins, A; Escubedo, E; Guitart, L; Jiménez, A; Pallàs, M; Pubill, D; Sureda, FX, 1998
)
0.3
") was administered 30 min prior to a neurotoxic MeAmp dosage for this species (2 x 2 mg/kg, 4 h apart); control subjects received MeAmp."( Dizocilpine and reduced body temperature do not prevent methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity in the vervet monkey: [11C]WIN 35,428 - positron emission tomography studies.
Harvey, DC; Huang, SC; Lacan, G; Melega, WP; Phelps, ME, 1998
)
0.3
"), which facilitates histamine release, significantly shifted the methamphetamine dose-response curve to the left when tested together with different doses of methamphetamine and markedly extended the time-course of methamphetamine's discriminative-stimulus effects."( Potentiation of the discriminative-stimulus effects of methamphetamine by the histamine H3 receptor antagonist thioperamide in rats.
Goldberg, SR; Munzar, P; Nosál, R, 1998
)
0.3
"0 mg/kg nisoxetine significantly shifted the methamphetamine dose-response curve to the left."( Noradrenergic modulation of the discriminative-stimulus effects of methamphetamine in rats.
Goldberg, SR; Munzar, P, 1999
)
0.3
" The features of the stimulant-induced seizures were distinct and included the following: (1) the duration of convulsive activity was shortest for cocaine and longest for methamphetamine, (2) only MDMA produced a secondary clonic phase after the initial ictal event, and (3) 4-methylaminorex manifested a very steep dose-response curve."( Distinct features of seizures induced by cocaine and amphetamine analogs.
Hanson, GR; Jensen, M; Johnson, M; White, HS, 1999
)
0.3
"6 mg/kg), significantly shifted the methamphetamine dose-response curve to the left."( Effects of various serotonin agonists, antagonists, and uptake inhibitors on the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine in rats.
Goldberg, SR; Kutkat, SW; Laufert, MD; Munzar, P; Nováková, J, 1999
)
0.3
" In test sessions preceded by doses of pentobarbital, chlordiazepoxide, or ethanol, pigeons switched from responding on the saline-biased key at low doses to responding on the pentobarbital-biased key at higher doses (the dose-response curve was quantal)."( Drug discrimination under a concurrent fixed-ratio fixed-ratio schedule.
Li, M; McMillan, DE, 1999
)
0.3
" Rats treated repeatedly with the post-session large behaviorally disruptive dose of METH valued the delayed large rewards less than the saline-treated rats, indicating that this dosing regimen of METH increased impulsiveness."( Effects of methamphetamine on the adjusting amount procedure, a model of impulsive behavior in rats.
de Wit, H; Richards, JB; Sabol, KE, 1999
)
0.3
", 24 hours apart; a neurotoxic dosage for this species)."( Long-term methamphetamine-induced decreases of [(11)C]WIN 35,428 binding in striatum are reduced by GDNF: PET studies in the vervet monkey.
Desalles, AA; Lacan, G; Melega, WP; Phelps, ME, 2000
)
0.31
" Recent dose-response studies demonstrated that pretreatment with the putative antiaddictive agent, ibogaine (IBO), and a synthetic iboga alkaloid congener, 18-methoxycoronaridine (18-MC), increase the potency of cocaine to elicit behavioral sensitization, an effect proposed to contribute, in part, to their ability to attenuate drug self-administration."( Interactions between iboga agents and methamphetamine sensitization: studies of locomotion and stereotypy in rats.
Balogun, MY; Glick, SD; Maisonneuve, IM; Szumlinski, KK, 2000
)
0.31
"6 mg/kg) did not attenuate the discriminative-stimulus effects of the training dose of cocaine or methamphetamine and did not produce any shift in the cocaine and methamphetamine dose-response curves."( Failure of baclofen to modulate discriminative-stimulus effects of cocaine or methamphetamine in rats.
Goldberg, SR; Kutkat, SW; Miller, CR; Munzar, P, 2000
)
0.31
" Although increasing the dosage of d-METH (20 to 80 mg/kg) did increase the GFAP response (100% over control), it was still well below that usually exhibited at the usual neurotoxic dosage (300-400% over control) in fully mature mice."( Age as a susceptibility factor in the striatal dopaminergic neurotoxicity observed in the mouse following substituted amphetamine exposure.
Ali, SF; Miller, DB; O'Callaghan, JP, 2000
)
0.31
" Likewise, female mice of both strains exhibited the lowest dopamine depletions in the striatum when the dosing regimen of methamphetamine started at proestrus whereas the greatest dopamine depletions in the striatum occurred when the regimen started during diestrus."( Sexual differences and estrous cycle in methamphetamine-induced dopamine and serotonin depletions in the striatum of mice.
Liao, PC; Yu, L, 2000
)
0.31
" The analytical performance of 12 commercially available ELISAs was determined in terms of binding characteristics, dose-response curves, limits of detection, sensitivity, intra- and interassay imprecision, and lot-to-lot reproducibility."( Comparison of ELISAs for opiates, methamphetamine, cocaine metabolite, benzodiazepines, phencyclidine, and cannabinoids in whole blood and urine.
Kerrigan, S; Phillips, WH, 2001
)
0.31
" When RTI 111 was given as a pretreatment to monkeys self-administering MA under a progressive-ratio schedule, the MA dose-response function shifted to the left and down."( Reinforcing and discriminative stimulus effects of RTI 111, a 3-phenyltropane analog, in rhesus monkeys: interaction with methamphetamine.
Anderson, KG; Carroll, FI; Ranaldi, R; Woolverton, WL, 2000
)
0.31
" Brain area under the concentration (AUC) values were consistently higher, regardless of dosing schedule, in offspring treated on postnatal day (P) 1 compared to those treated on P11."( Plasma and brain methamphetamine concentrations in neonatal rats.
Cappon, GD; Vorhees, CV,
)
0.13
" This dosage regimen, therefore, serves as an appropriate animal model for assessing the potential risks to human offspring exposed to methamphetamine in utero."( Methamphetamine concentrations in fetal and maternal brain following prenatal exposure.
Bubula, N; Heller, A; McCoy, H; Won, L,
)
0.13
"To investigate possible influences of ethanol (EtOH) on metabolism of methamphetamine (MA), dark agouti (DA) rats were assigned to 3 groups including EtOH mono-dosing group, MA mono-dosing group and combined dosing group of EtOH and MA."( Influence of ethanol on metabolism of methamphetamine in rats including hair analysis.
Hayashida, M; Nihira, M; Yamada, T, 2001
)
0.31
" It is suggested that the commonly used experimental one-day methamphetamine dosing regimen better models the acute overdose pathologies seen in humans, whereas chronic models are needed to accurately model human long-term abuse."( Methamphetamine neurotoxicity: necrotic and apoptotic mechanisms and relevance to human abuse and treatment.
Davidson, C; Ellinwood, EH; Gow, AJ; Lee, TH, 2001
)
0.31
" Four doses, administered at 2 h intervals, of 15 mg/kg (4x15 mg/kg) D-METH significantly decreased TH and dopamine levels to 50% of control in mice becoming hypothermic during dosing in a 13 degrees C environment."( Phenobarbital and dizocilpine can block methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity in mice by mechanisms that are independent of thermoregulation.
Bowyer, JF; Holson, RR; Miller, DB; O'Callaghan, JP, 2001
)
0.31
" The finding that L-NAME can have opposite effects on the METH-neurotoxicity according to the dosing is important, however, additional experiments should be performed to clarify which type of NOS is related to these effects."( Effect of low doses of L-NAME on methamphetamine-induced dopaminergic depletion in the rat striatum.
Abekawa, T; Honda, M; Ito, K; Koyama, T; Ohmori, T, 2001
)
0.31
" The ability of (+/-)-1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOI), a 5-HT(2A) receptor agonist, and ketanserin, a 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist, to either substitute for or block the discriminative-stimulus effects of cocaine, or to shift the cocaine dose-response curve, was evaluated."( Differential involvement of 5-HT(2A) receptors in the discriminative-stimulus effects of cocaine and methamphetamine.
Goldberg, SR; Justinova, Z; Kutkat, SW; Munzar, P, 2002
)
0.31
"6 mg/kg DPCPX shifted the methamphetamine dose-response curve to the left."( Adenosinergic modulation of the discriminative-stimulus effects of methamphetamine in rats.
Ferré, S; Goldberg, SR; Justinova, Z; Kutkat, SW; Munzar, P, 2002
)
0.31
" Baclofen significantly reduced break points at all doses of methamphetamine, producing a dose-orderly shift of the methamphetamine dose-response function to the right."( Baclofen decreases methamphetamine self-administration in rats.
Poeggel, K; Ranaldi, R, 2002
)
0.31
"Animals were trained to discriminate 5 or 10 mg/kg cocaine (rats), or 3 mg/kg (+)-amphetamine (pigeons) from saline, after which dose-response curves were determined for (+)-methamphetamine and other drugs before and after administration of a (+)-methamphetamine-specific monoclonal antibody (K(D) =250 nM)."( Pharmacokinetic antagonism of (+)-methamphetamine discrimination by a low-affinity monoclonal anti-methamphetamine antibody.
Hardwick, WC; Li, M; McMillan, DE; Owens, SM, 2002
)
0.31
" Similarly, a dosage of KA that did not increase glial fibrillary acidic protein in lean mice increased the hippocampal content of this protein (93%) in ob/ob mice."( Obesity exacerbates chemically induced neurodegeneration.
Benkovic, SA; Miller, DB; O'Callaghan, JP; Sriram, K, 2002
)
0.31
", approximately 21-22 degrees C) and utilizing a repeated dosage regimen (e."( Elevated environmental temperature and methamphetamine neurotoxicity.
Miller, DB; O'Callaghan, JP, 2003
)
0.32
"Bupropion produced a biphasic dose-response pattern at both nicotine infusion doses, increasing infusions at low bupropion doses and decreasing infusions at high bupropion doses."( Effect of bupropion on nicotine self-administration in rats.
Bardo, MT; Dwoskin, LP; Neugebauer, N; Rauhut, AS, 2003
)
0.32
"A high-performance liquid chromatography procedure for the simultaneous determination of aminophylline, methoxyphenamine hydrochloride, noscapine and chlorphenamine maleate in commercially available compound capsule dosage forms has been developed and validated."( HPLC determination of aminophylline, methoxyphenamine hydrochloride, noscapine and chlorphenamine maleate in compound dosage forms with an aqueous-organic mobile phase.
Tang, C; Wu, X; Yin, C, 2003
)
0.32
" The A1 and A2A receptor antagonists (CPT and MSX-3) both produced high levels of drug-lever selection when substituted for either methamphetamine or cocaine and significantly shifted dose-response curves of both psychostimulants to the left."( Involvement of adenosine A1 and A2A receptors in the adenosinergic modulation of the discriminative-stimulus effects of cocaine and methamphetamine in rats.
Antoniou, K; Ferre, S; Goldberg, SR; Highkin, JL; Hockemeyer, J; Justinova, Z; Munzar, P; Pappas, LA; Segal, PN; Solinas, M, 2003
)
0.32
" Treatment groups received different dosage of MC (3, 9, and 27 mg daily, MC group) or prednisone (0."( Anti-inflammatory effect of methoxyphenamine compound in rat model of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Bai, CX; Chen, J; Hong, QY; Wang, YH, 2003
)
0.32
" Dose-response curves obtained under the PR schedule during maintenance indicated that female rats self-administered significantly more METH infusions compared to male rats."( Sex differences in the acquisition of IV methamphetamine self-administration and subsequent maintenance under a progressive ratio schedule in rats.
Carroll, ME; Roth, ME, 2004
)
0.32
" They did not, however, show discriminative behavior according to the type and dosage of the drugs."( Visual discrimination of normal and drug induced behavior in quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica).
Shinohara, N; Watanabe, S; Yamazaki, Y, 2004
)
0.32
"In the present experiment we evaluated the dose-response effects of estrogen (estradiol benzoate; EB) and tamoxifen (TMX) in modulating the acute behavioral and chronic effects of methamphetamine (MA) upon the nigrostriatal dopaminergic (NSDA) system in ovariectomized (OVX) mice."( Dose-response effects of estrogen and tamoxifen upon methamphetamine-induced behavioral responses and neurotoxicity of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system in female mice.
Dluzen, DE; Mickley, KR, 2004
)
0.32
" A previous dose-response study showed that administration of 5 mg/kg methamphetamine, four times daily from postnatal days 11 to 20 produced these deficits, although the effects were not as severe as at higher doses of 10 or 15 mg/kg."( Behavioral and growth effects induced by low dose methamphetamine administration during the neonatal period in rats.
Moran, MS; Vorhees, CV; Williams, MT,
)
0.13
"Acute high dose methamphetamine (METH) dosing regimens are frequently used in animal studies, however, these regimens can lead to considerable toxicity and even death in experimental animals."( Modeling human methamphetamine exposure in nonhuman primates: chronic dosing in the rhesus macaque leads to behavioral and physiological abnormalities.
Flynn, CT; Fox, HS; Henriksen, SJ; Katner, SN; Madden, LJ; May, M; Parsons, LH; Zandonatti, MA, 2005
)
0.33
"05), and the (+)METH and (+)-amphetamine (AMP) maximum concentrations occurred later following subcutaneous than after intraperitoneal dosing (P<0."( (+)-Methamphetamine-induced spontaneous behavior in rats depends on route of (+)METH administration.
Gentry, WB; Ghafoor, AU; Hendrickson, HP; Laurenzana, EM; Owens, SM; Wessinger, WD, 2004
)
0.32
" As the dosage increased, continuous SIB accompanied by a reduction in locomotor activity was observed."( Effects of dopamine- and serotonin-related compounds on methamphetamine-induced self-injurious behavior in mice.
Ito, S; Kita, T; Mori, T; Sawaguchi, T, 2004
)
0.32
" Efficacy in this model was maintained for 3 to 6 h and following repeated dosing with ABT-239."( Pharmacological properties of ABT-239 [4-(2-{2-[(2R)-2-Methylpyrrolidinyl]ethyl}-benzofuran-5-yl)benzonitrile]: II. Neurophysiological characterization and broad preclinical efficacy in cognition and schizophrenia of a potent and selective histamine H3 re
Ballard, ME; Bennani, YL; Bitner, RS; Browman, KE; Buckley, MJ; Cowart, MD; Decker, MW; Drescher, KU; Esbenshade, TA; Faghih, R; Fox, GB; Hancock, AA; Komater, VA; Krueger, KM; Lemaire, M; Marsh, K; Miner, H; Pan, JB; Porsolt, RD; Radek, RJ; Rueter, LE; Sullivan, JP; Wetter, J; Yao, BB; Zhang, M, 2005
)
0.33
"We compared two different methamphetamine dosing regimens and found distinct long-term behavioral and neurochemical changes."( Acute and chronic continuous methamphetamine have different long-term behavioral and neurochemical consequences.
Davidson, C; Ellinwood, EH; Lee, TH, 2005
)
0.33
" All tests were conducted prior to dosing each day."( Maternal behavior is impaired by methamphetamine administered during pre-mating, gestation and lactation.
Charousová, P; Pometlová, M; Slamberová, R,
)
0.13
" When participants received placebo at both dosing times, performance on some psychomotor tasks (e."( Combined effects of methamphetamine and zolpidem on performance and mood during simulated night shift work.
Foltin, RW; Haney, M; Hart, CL; Nasser, J, 2005
)
0.33
" In subsequent testing, dose-response curves were determined for the individual drugs, for a wide range of dose combinations of the training drugs, and for two drugs to which the pigeons had not been exposed previously (pseudoephedrine and nicotine)."( Effects of amphetamine-CNS depressant combinations and of other CNS stimulants in four-choice drug discriminations.
Li, M; McMillan, DE; Wessinger, WD, 2005
)
0.33
" Acute dosing with up to 200 mg topiramate appears to enhance, rather than attenuate, the positive subjective effects of methamphetamine."( Effects of acute topiramate dosing on methamphetamine-induced subjective mood.
Ait-Daoud, N; Dawes, MA; Johnson, BA; Liu, L; Roache, JD; Wallace, CL; Wang, XQ; Wells, LT, 2007
)
0.34
" In this study we assessed the utility of using dose-response properties to distinguish urine samples containing amphetamines from samples containing cross-immunoreactive species."( Differentiation of amphetamine/methamphetamine and other cross-immunoreactive sympathomimetic amines in urine samples by serial dilution testing.
Dietzen, DJ; Koenig, JW; Moyer, TP; Saunders, AN; Turk, J; Woodworth, A, 2006
)
0.33
"Use of the slope of the dose-response relationship in patient urine specimens can enhance the PPV of presumptive positive immunoassay results but does not exclude the presence of low amphetamine concentrations in samples containing high concentrations of cross-reactive species."( Differentiation of amphetamine/methamphetamine and other cross-immunoreactive sympathomimetic amines in urine samples by serial dilution testing.
Dietzen, DJ; Koenig, JW; Moyer, TP; Saunders, AN; Turk, J; Woodworth, A, 2006
)
0.33
" After responding stabilized, cumulative dose-response curves were obtained for PCP and (+)-METH."( Effects of anti-phencyclidine and anti-(+)-methamphetamine monoclonal antibodies alone and in combination on the discrimination of phencyclidine and (+)-methamphetamine by pigeons.
Daniels, JR; Gunnell, MG; Hall, CJ; Hardwick, WC; Li, M; McMillan, DE; Owens, SM; Wessinger, WD, 2006
)
0.33
" The anti-PCP antibody shifted the PCP dose-response curve further to the right and for a longer time than the anti-(+)-METH antibody shifted the dose response curve for (+)-METH."( Effects of anti-phencyclidine and anti-(+)-methamphetamine monoclonal antibodies alone and in combination on the discrimination of phencyclidine and (+)-methamphetamine by pigeons.
Daniels, JR; Gunnell, MG; Hall, CJ; Hardwick, WC; Li, M; McMillan, DE; Owens, SM; Wessinger, WD, 2006
)
0.33
" Ultimately, all doses in the dose-response study engendered self-administration of the same amount of total drug in a 6-h session in the extended-access group."( Escalation of methamphetamine self-administration in rats: a dose-effect function.
Kitamura, O; Koob, GF; Pulvirenti, L; Specio, SE; Wee, S, 2006
)
0.33
" Dosing order was determined by utilizing a within-subjects Latin square design."( Differences in extinction responding and reinstatement of methamphetamine-seeking behavior between Fischer 344 and Lewis rats.
Kruzich, PJ; Xi, J, 2006
)
0.33
"In recent work we have documented lasting adverse neurochemical and behavioural effects in rats given short-term 'binge' dosing with methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, Ecstasy), methamphetamine (METH) or their combination."( Repeated weekly exposure to MDMA, methamphetamine or their combination: long-term behavioural and neurochemical effects in rats.
Clemens, KJ; Cornish, JL; Hunt, GE; McGregor, IS, 2007
)
0.34
" The time-course excretion profiles of methylone and its three metabolites in rats were further investigated after a single intraperitoneal dosing of 5 mg kg-1 methylone hydrochloride."( Metabolism of the recently encountered designer drug, methylone, in humans and rats.
Kamata, HT; Kamata, T; Katagi, M; Miki, A; Nishikawa, M; Shima, N; Tsuchihashi, H; Zaitsu, K, 2006
)
0.33
" Upon observing stable levels of self-administration, METH was substituted for COC and a dose-response function for METH (0."( Reinforcing effects of smoked methamphetamine in rhesus monkeys.
Carroll, ME; Newman, JL, 2006
)
0.33
" The 30 min corticosterone response after multiple methamphetamine doses was augmented compared to single exposures, with the exception of the two earliest dosing intervals ending on P5 and P7, where the responses were lower."( Ontogeny of the adrenal response to (+)-methamphetamine in neonatal rats: the effect of prior drug exposure.
Ehrman, LA; Furay, AR; Schaefer, TL; Vorhees, CV; Williams, MT, 2006
)
0.33
" Dose-response relationships were biphasic for MA and (+/-)-MDMA, and asymptotic for (+)-MDMA."( Estimating the relative reinforcing strength of (+/-)-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and its isomers in rhesus monkeys: comparison to (+)-methamphetamine.
Wang, Z; Woolverton, WL, 2007
)
0.34
" METH1 evoked a transient threefold increase in DA overflow in only one-third of dosed rats."( Methamphetamine, morphine, and their combination: acute changes in striatal dopaminergic transmission evaluated by microdialysis in awake rats.
Ali, SF; Lourenço, E; Macedo, TR; Milhazes, N; Morgadinho, T; Pereira, FC; Ribeiro, CF, 2006
)
0.33
" The first experiment involved characterisation of the METH dose-response curve for intravenous self-administration."( Intravenous methamphetamine self-administration in rats: effects of intravenous or intraperitoneal MDMA co-administration.
Clemens, KJ; Cornish, JL; Hunt, GE; McGregor, IS, 2006
)
0.33
" Larger laboratory studies with chronic dosing regimens are needed to establish whether or not there is a kinetic interaction between topiramate and methamphetamine."( Kinetic and cardiovascular effects of acute topiramate dosing among non-treatment-seeking, methamphetamine-dependent individuals.
Ait-Daoud, N; Dawes, MA; Javors, MA; Johnson, BA; Liu, L; Roache, JD; Wallace, CL; Wang, XQ; Wells, LT, 2007
)
0.34
" After 15 sessions, the dose-response function of methamphetamine was determined under either a progressive- or a fixed-ratio schedule."( Effect of aripiprazole, a partial dopamine D2 receptor agonist, on increased rate of methamphetamine self-administration in rats with prolonged session duration.
Koob, GF; Pulvirenti, L; Wang, Z; Wee, S; Woolverton, WL, 2007
)
0.34
"This review of the disposition of methamphetamine in oral fluid, plasma, and urine is based on a comprehensive controlled dosing study involving five healthy, drug-free research volunteers who resided on a closed clinical ward for 12 weeks."( Methamphetamine disposition in oral fluid, plasma, and urine.
Cone, EJ; Huestis, MA, 2007
)
0.34
"The approach taken is to administer a regimen of methamphetamine known to be neurotoxic to dopamine and serotonin nerve terminals in the rat, and to investigate the influences of that dosing regimen on (i) cortical neuron integrity and function using anatomical stains and (ii) novel object recognition memory."( Methamphetamine-induced neural and cognitive changes in rodents.
Belcher, AM; Feinstein, EM; Marshall, JF; O'Dell, SJ, 2007
)
0.34
" Additional experiments with THC employed a dosing regimen that increased the number of injections, controlled for behavioral tolerance, examined different aspects of behavior, and used a different species (Sprague-Dawley rats)."( Lack of behavioral sensitization after repeated exposure to THC in mice and comparison to methamphetamine.
Lichtman, AH; Martin, BR; Varvel, SA, 2007
)
0.34
"The purpose of the current study was to establish dose-response relationships for the effects of a number of commonly used illicit stimulants and investigate the behavioral response to increased core temperature."( Pharmacological and behavioral determinants of cocaine, methamphetamine, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, and para-methoxyamphetamine-induced hyperthermia.
Irvine, RJ; Jaehne, EJ; Salem, A, 2007
)
0.34
" This differed to the slopes of the dose-response curves where MDMA and PMA showed the steepest slope for the doses used followed by methamphetamine then cocaine."( Pharmacological and behavioral determinants of cocaine, methamphetamine, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, and para-methoxyamphetamine-induced hyperthermia.
Irvine, RJ; Jaehne, EJ; Salem, A, 2007
)
0.34
" As the most potent dose (1 mg/kg) of lipopolysaccharide was administered two weeks, one day before or after the methamphetamine dosing regimen, methamphetamine-induced striatal dopamine and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid depletions remained unaltered."( Attenuation of methamphetamine-induced nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurotoxicity in mice by lipopolysaccharide pretreatment.
Cherng, CG; Kuo, YM; Liao, PC; Lin, YC; Su, SW; Yu, L, 2007
)
0.34
" Animals subjected to a binge mAMPH dosing regimen that damages brain dopamine and serotonin terminals show impairments in an object recognition (OR) task."( Methamphetamine influences on recognition memory: comparison of escalating and single-day dosing regimens.
Belcher, AM; Feinstein, EM; Marshall, JF; O'Dell, SJ, 2008
)
0.35
" It has proven superior to the open field investigations in allowing dose-response effects to be observed over a relatively short observation period (i."( Development of a home cage locomotor tracking system capable of detecting the stimulant and sedative properties of drugs in rats.
Dunne, F; Kelly, JP; O'Halloran, A, 2007
)
0.34
" This dosing regimen is known to be toxic for striatal dopamine terminals."( Methamphetamine induces ectopic expression of tyrosine hydroxylase and increases noradrenaline levels within the cerebellar cortex.
Bovolin, P; Busceti, CL; Falleni, A; Ferrucci, M; Fornai, F; Fumagalli, L; Lazzeri, G; Mastroiacovo, F; Nori, SL; Paparelli, A; Pompili, E, 2007
)
0.34
"5% (high) weekly sweat patches from the dosing week were positive for MAMP, and all patches applied after the dosing week were negative."( Excretion of methamphetamine and amphetamine in human sweat following controlled oral methamphetamine administration.
Barnes, AJ; Cone, EJ; Huestis, MA; Kacinko, SL; Moolchan, ET; Schwilke, EW; Smith, ML, 2008
)
0.35
" Analyses conducted on NNNS summary scores included exposure group effects, heavy MA use effects, association with frequency of use by trimester, and dose-response relationships with amphetamine metabolites."( Prenatal methamphetamine use and neonatal neurobehavioral outcome.
Arria, A; Della Grotta, S; Derauf, C; Fallone, M; Grant, P; Haning, W; Huestis, M; Lagasse, LL; Lester, BM; Liu, J; Shah, R; Smith, LM; Strauss, A,
)
0.13
" The dose-response relationships may represent neurotoxic effects from MA."( Prenatal methamphetamine use and neonatal neurobehavioral outcome.
Arria, A; Della Grotta, S; Derauf, C; Fallone, M; Grant, P; Haning, W; Huestis, M; Lagasse, LL; Lester, BM; Liu, J; Shah, R; Smith, LM; Strauss, A,
)
0.13
" A correlation between drug-induced release and currents is also strengthened by the similar bell shape of the dose-response curves."( N,N-dimethyl-thioamphetamine and methyl-thioamphetamine, two non-neurotoxic substrates of 5-HT transporters, have scant in vitro efficacy for the induction of transporter-mediated 5-HT release and currents.
Bonanno, G; Forray, MI; Funicello, M; Gerstbrein, K; Gobbi, M; Gysling, K; Holy, M; Mennini, T; Moya, PR; Paluzzi, S; Reyes-Parada, M; Sitte, HH; Sotomayor, R, 2008
)
0.35
") dosing (0."( Bioavailability of (+)-methamphetamine in the pigeon following an intramuscular dose.
Hardwick, WC; Hendrickson, HP; McMillan, DE; Owens, SM, 2008
)
0.35
"Since questions have been raised about the typical neurotoxic dosing regimen used in animals and whether it adequately models human cumulative drug exposure, these experiments examined two different dosing regimens."( Effect of +-methamphetamine on path integration learning, novel object recognition, and neurotoxicity in rats.
Gudelsky, GA; Herring, NR; Schaefer, TL; Vorhees, CV; Williams, MT, 2008
)
0.35
" In two separate experiments, dosing regimens were compared for their effects on markers of neurotoxicity or on behavior."( Effect of +-methamphetamine on path integration learning, novel object recognition, and neurotoxicity in rats.
Gudelsky, GA; Herring, NR; Schaefer, TL; Vorhees, CV; Williams, MT, 2008
)
0.35
"On markers of neurotoxicity, MA showed decreased dopamine (DA) and 5-HT, increased glial fibrillary acidic protein, and increased corticosterone levels regardless of dosing regimen 3 days post-treatment."( Effect of +-methamphetamine on path integration learning, novel object recognition, and neurotoxicity in rats.
Gudelsky, GA; Herring, NR; Schaefer, TL; Vorhees, CV; Williams, MT, 2008
)
0.35
" Dosing regimen had no differential effects on behavior or neurotoxicity."( Effect of +-methamphetamine on path integration learning, novel object recognition, and neurotoxicity in rats.
Gudelsky, GA; Herring, NR; Schaefer, TL; Vorhees, CV; Williams, MT, 2008
)
0.35
" The dosing paradigm caused an increased stereotyped response in rats treated with METH compared with saline controls."( Neuronal dopamine transporter activity, density and methamphetamine inhibition are differentially altered in the nucleus accumbens and striatum with no changes in glycosylation in rats behaviorally sensitized to methamphetamine.
Bjorklund, NL; Schenk, JO; Sorg, BA, 2008
)
0.35
" Following baseline Meth dosing (15 mg and 30 mg), participants received 2 wk treatment with aripiprazole (n=8) or placebo (n=8)."( Evaluation of subjective effects of aripiprazole and methamphetamine in methamphetamine-dependent volunteers.
Abad, A; Anderson, A; Condos, R; De La Garza, R; Elkashef, A; Halkitis, PN; Li, SH; Mahoney, JJ; Mojisak, J; Newton, TF; Palamar, J; Reid, MS, 2008
)
0.35
"Caffeine, CPT, and MSX-3 partially generalized to nicotine and shifted nicotine dose-response curves leftwards."( Effects of chronic caffeine exposure on adenosinergic modulation of the discriminative-stimulus effects of nicotine, methamphetamine, and cocaine in rats.
Barnes, C; Ferré, S; Goldberg, SR; Justinova, Z; Le Foll, B; Pappas, LA; Wertheim, CE, 2009
)
0.35
" Two days later the same dosing and sensitization regimen was repeated once."( Methamphetamine and diazepam suppress antigen-specific cytokine expression and antibody production in ovalbumin-sensitized BALB/c mice.
Chang, FC; Jan, TR; Wey, SP; Wu, HY, 2008
)
0.35
"Both methamphetamine and cocaine increased locomotor activity in a dose-response fashion, but the magnitude of the increase was less in adolescents than adults."( Evaluation of a pharmacokinetic hypothesis for reduced locomotor stimulation from methamphetamine and cocaine in adolescent versus adult male C57BL/6J mice.
Gupta, T; Rhodes, JS; Zombeck, JA, 2009
)
0.35
"In a 2-session double-blind placebo-controlled study 12 participants (ages 14-17) were dosed with 4 (session 1) and 12 (session 2) inhalations from VVIs with (USA) or without (UK) L-methamphetamine and then performed two 20 minute rides on a stationary bike with rides separated by a 30 minute rest."( The effects of inhaled L-methamphetamine on athletic performance while riding a stationary bike: a randomised placebo-controlled trial.
Baggott, M; Dufka, F; Galloway, G; Mendelson, J, 2009
)
0.35
" The poisoning dosage is 5 microg/mL in the plasma and lethal dosage is 10-40 microg/mL in the plasma according the report."( Death from accidental poisoning of methamphetamine by leaking into alimentary tract in drug traffic: a case report.
Guan, DW; Li, RB; Zhang, GH; Zhao, R; Zhu, BL, 2009
)
0.35
" A number of sympathomimetic amines are capable of causing myocardial damage, but the cardio-toxic action of MA has been of particular interest since standardized dosage consistently produces myocardial lesions."( Histopathological studies of cardiac lesions after long term administration of methamphetamine in high dosage--Part II.
Hasnan, J; Islam, MN; Jesmine, K; Kong Sn Molh, A, 2009
)
0.35
" Continued METH dosing in the surviving groups did not affect the mean pups/litter weight at the end of the experiment on GD21."( Vulnerability to (+)-methamphetamine effects and the relationship to drug disposition in pregnant rats during chronic infusion.
Gentry, WB; Hendrickson, HP; Laurenzana, EM; Owens, SM; Ward, KW; White, SJ; Williams, DK, 2009
)
0.35
" We treated male Long-Evans rats with a regimen of four injections of 2 mg/kg mAMPH (or vehicle) within a single day, a dosing regimen shown earlier to produce object recognition impairments."( Reversal-specific learning impairments after a binge regimen of methamphetamine in rats: possible involvement of striatal dopamine.
Belcher, AM; Cazares, VA; Chen, J; Izquierdo, A; Malvaez, M; Marshall, JF; O'Dell, SJ; Scott, L; Wu, T, 2010
)
0.36
"02 mg/kg, subcutaneous), on MDMA self-administration, effects of this dose range on the MA dose-response curve were determined."( Effect of D1-like and D2-like receptor antagonists on methamphetamine and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine self-administration in rats.
Brennan, KA; Carati, C; Fitzmaurice, PS; Lea, RA; Schenk, S, 2009
)
0.35
"To develop a descriptive profile of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) pharmacological treatment patterns in terms of persistence, adherence, augmentation, switching, and dosing changes; and to assess differences in treatment patterns with regard to ADHD medication type, class, and duration of action."( Pharmacological treatment patterns among patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: retrospective claims-based analysis of a managed care population.
Christensen, L; Harley, C; Hodgkins, P; Sasané, R; Tetali, S, 2010
)
0.36
" In autoshaping task a dose-response curve for METH was determined."( Autoradiographic study of serotonin transporter during memory formation.
Castillo, C; Meneses, A; Rocha, L; Tellez, R, 2010
)
0.36
"Animals repeatedly dosed with methamphetamine during a single day suffer damage to brain dopamine and serotonin terminals and show behavioral deficits."( Neurotoxic methamphetamine regimens produce long-lasting changes in striatal G-proteins.
Boikess, SR; Marshall, JF; O'Dell, SJ, 2010
)
0.36
" NNNS summary scores were analyzed for exposure including heavy exposure and frequency of use by trimester and dose-response relationship with the amphetamine analyte."( Prenatal methamphetamine exposure and neonatal neurobehavioral outcome in the USA and New Zealand.
Arria, AM; Della Grotta, S; Derauf, C; Huestis, MA; LaGasse, LL; Lester, BM; Newman, E; Shah, RZ; Smith, LM; Wilcox, T; Wouldes, T,
)
0.13
" Dose-response effects were observed between amphetamine concentration in meconium and CNS stress."( Prenatal methamphetamine exposure and neonatal neurobehavioral outcome in the USA and New Zealand.
Arria, AM; Della Grotta, S; Derauf, C; Huestis, MA; LaGasse, LL; Lester, BM; Newman, E; Shah, RZ; Smith, LM; Wilcox, T; Wouldes, T,
)
0.13
" These data reveal complex effects of METH on vesicular function that vary according to the vesicle population under study, dosing regimen, and time after treatment."( Methamphetamine alters vesicular monoamine transporter-2 function and potassium-stimulated dopamine release.
Chu, PW; Fleckenstein, AE; Hadlock, GC; Hanson, GR; Stout, K; Vieira-Brock, P, 2010
)
0.36
" In this work, dose-response curves (0."( Behavioral profiles in rats distinguish among "ecstasy," methamphetamine and 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine: Mixed effects for "ecstasy" analogues.
Cassels, BK; Díaz-Véliz, G; Mora-Gutiérrez, S; Quinteros-Muñoz, D; Rebolledo-Fuentes, M; Sáez-Briones, P, 2010
)
0.36
" In conclusion, our data suggest that low dosage of MA worsens the suppression of locomotor responses and striatal dopamine turnover after mTBI."( Methamphetamine potentiates behavioral and electrochemical responses after mild traumatic brain injury in mice.
Chiang, YH; Harvey, BK; Pick, CG; Shen, H; Wang, Y, 2011
)
0.37
" These studies provide the first preclinical pregnancy model in any species for chronic mAb dosing and could have important implications for the use of antibody therapies involving blood organ barriers (such as addiction) or other chronic diseases in women of childbearing age (e."( The fate and function of therapeutic antiaddiction monoclonal antibodies across the reproductive cycle of rats.
Gentry, WB; Hubbard, JJ; Laurenzana, EM; Owens, SM; Williams, DK, 2011
)
0.37
" Twelve subjects were dosed with 5 mg of l-MA-d(3) daily and challenged with 15, 30, and 45 mg of nonlabeled d-MA (d-MA-d(0)) after reaching plasma steady status of l-MA-d(3)."( A method to quantify illicit intake of drugs from urine: methamphetamine.
Baggott, MJ; Coyle, JR; Everhart, ET; Galloway, GP; Li, L; Lopez, JC; Mendelson, J; Verotta, D, 2011
)
0.37
" We tested this hypothesis in a dose-response study in a second replicate set of mouse lines selectively bred for high vs."( Sensitivity to rewarding or aversive effects of methamphetamine determines methamphetamine intake.
Cunningham, CL; McKinnon, CS; Phillips, TJ; Reed, C; Shabani, S, 2011
)
0.37
" In animals, binge mAMPH dosing regimens deplete markers for monoamine nerve terminals, for example, dopamine and serotonin transporters (DAT and SERT), in striatum and cerebral cortex."( Striatal dopamine D1 and D2 receptors: widespread influences on methamphetamine-induced dopamine and serotonin neurotoxicity.
Duncker, PC; Gross, NB; Marshall, JF, 2011
)
0.37
"3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is a racemic drug of abuse and its R- and S-enantiomers are known to differ in their dose-response curve."( Development and validation of LC-HRMS and GC-NICI-MS methods for stereoselective determination of MDMA and its phase I and II metabolites in human urine.
Huestis, MA; Maurer, HH; Meyer, MR; Schwaninger, AE, 2011
)
0.37
" However, ketamine and ifenprodil produced significant leftward shifts in the methamphetamine dose-response curve."( Discriminative stimulus effects of NMDA, AMPA, and mGluR5 glutamate receptor ligands in methamphetamine-trained rats.
Bardo, MT; Dwoskin, LP; Wooters, TE, 2011
)
0.37
" Adult male rats were allowed constant access to running wheels or kept in nonwheel cages for three weeks, then given a binge dosing regimen of mAMPH or saline."( Running wheel exercise ameliorates methamphetamine-induced damage to dopamine and serotonin terminals.
Ball, AJ; Galvez, BA; Marshall, JF; O'Dell, SJ, 2012
)
0.38
"In this study, mice were exposed to dosing regimens of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), methamphetamine (METH), or parachloroamphetamine (PCA) known to deplete the monoamine neurotransmitters dopamine and serotonin, and the effects of these dosing regimens on learning and memory were assessed."( Effects of exposure to amphetamine derivatives on passive avoidance performance and the central levels of monoamines and their metabolites in mice: correlations between behavior and neurochemistry.
Fantegrossi, WE; Finton, BJ; Galloway, MP; Howell, LL; Murnane, KS; Perrine, SA, 2012
)
0.38
" Pretreatment of male, Swiss Webster mice with intraperitoneal (10-20 mg/kg) or oral (20-30 mg/kg) dosing of AZ66 significantly attenuated the acute locomotor stimulatory effects of methamphetamine."( Synthesis and pharmacological characterization of a novel sigma receptor ligand with improved metabolic stability and antagonistic effects against methamphetamine.
Abdelazeem, AH; Avery, BA; Jamalapuram, S; Matsumoto, RR; McCurdy, CR; Mesangeau, C; Robson, MJ; Seminerio, MJ, 2012
)
0.38
" During the experiments, animals were dosed intravenously with the CB1 receptor antagonist rimonabant (0."( Cannabinoid receptors mediate methamphetamine induction of high frequency gamma oscillations in the nucleus accumbens.
Cheer, JF; Glick, SD; Morra, JT, 2012
)
0.38
"56 mg/kg) significantly reduced drug-reinforced responding, resulting in a downward displacement of dose-response functions."( Antagonism of metabotropic glutamate 1 receptors attenuates behavioral effects of cocaine and methamphetamine in squirrel monkeys.
Achat-Mendes, C; Platt, DM; Spealman, RD, 2012
)
0.38
" Acute dosing with amphetamines has improved driving-related performance in some laboratory studies, while epidemiological studies suggest an association between METH use, impaired driving, and accident culpability."( Driving on ice: impaired driving skills in current methamphetamine users.
Blaszczynski, A; Bosanquet, D; Macdougall, HG; McGregor, IS; McKetin, R; Rogers, SJ; Starmer, GA, 2013
)
0.39
" The augmented response to acute methamphetamine observed in Nrg1 HET mice disappeared with repeated, daily dosing over 7days."( Adolescent neuregulin 1 heterozygous mice display enhanced behavioural sensitivity to methamphetamine.
Arnold, JC; Boucher, AA; Darbyshire, KM; Spencer, JR, 2012
)
0.38
"2 mg/kg) in combination with METH induced reinstatement, suggesting that NIC produced a leftward shift in the dose-response effect of METH to reinstate CPP."( Reinstatement of methamphetamine conditioned place preference in nicotine-sensitized rats.
Bardo, MT; Berry, JN; Neugebauer, NM, 2012
)
0.38
" dosing of AZ66 significantly attenuated methamphetamine-induced striatal dopamine depletions, striatal dopamine transporter reductions and hyperthermia."( The evaluation of AZ66, an optimized sigma receptor antagonist, against methamphetamine-induced dopaminergic neurotoxicity and memory impairment in mice.
Hansen, R; Kaushal, N; Matsumoto, RR; McCurdy, CR; Seminerio, MJ; Zhang, HT, 2013
)
0.39
"As in many of our earlier studies with the same dosage regimen we found in the behavioural part both development of sensitization to methamphetamine stimulatory effects after repeated treatment and cross-sensitization to them by pre-treatment with cannabinoid receptor CB1 agonist methanandamide."( Altered dopamine D1 and D2 receptor mRNA expression in mesencephalon from mice exposed to repeated treatments with methamphetamine and cannabinoid CB1 agonist methanandamide.
Jurajda, M; Landa, L; Sulcova, A, 2012
)
0.38
" The results show that a binge dosing regimen of METH to the rat increased plasma and brain ammonia concentrations that were paralleled by evidence of hepatotoxicity."( Peripheral ammonia as a mediator of methamphetamine neurotoxicity.
Halpin, LE; Yamamoto, BK, 2012
)
0.38
" Overall, the emphasis here is on differences in effects observed between the striatal (the A9 substantia nigral dopamine pathway) and nucleus accumbens (the A10, ventral tegmental pathway) areas of the brain following acute as well as repeated dosing and withdrawal."( Mechanism of action of methamphetamine within the catecholamine and serotonin areas of the central nervous system.
Chiu, VM; Schenk, JO, 2012
)
0.38
" Dopamine, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) and their major metabolites were measured in striatum, frontal cortex and hippocampus by high performance liquid chromatography 7 days after intermittent dosing and 2h after acute injection."( Behavioural and neurochemical comparison of chronic intermittent cathinone, mephedrone and MDMA administration to the rat.
Ebling, FJ; Fone, KC; Jayson, R; King, MV; Korsah, C; Macerola, AE; Pillidge, KE; Richard Green, A; Shortall, SE; Swaby, RT; Wigmore, PM, 2013
)
0.39
" Previous research indicates that prenatal exposure to stimulant drugs is associated with dose-response alterations in neural growth and connectivity and consequent neurobehavioral deficits."( Cortisol reactivity in two-year-old children prenatally exposed to methamphetamine.
Abar, B; Arria, AM; Dansereau, LM; Dellagrotta, S; Derauf, C; Haning, W; Huestis, MA; Kirlic, N; Lagasse, LL; Lester, BM; Neal, CR; Newman, E; Shah, R; Smith, LM; Strauss, A, 2013
)
0.39
"In experiment 1, Sprague-Dawley rats were subject to SPS or control treatment and subsequently tested across four sessions of an escalating METH dosing paradigm."( Methamphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization in a rodent model of posttraumatic stress disorder.
Eagle, AL; Perrine, SA, 2013
)
0.39
" One way to interpret this pattern of effects is that pretreatment with naloxone appeared to produce a shift in the dose-response curve for METH."( The selective μ opioid receptor antagonist β-funaltrexamine attenuates methamphetamine-induced stereotypical biting in mice.
Fukushima, Y; Hall, FS; Kitanaka, J; Kitanaka, N; Kubo, H; Morita, Y; Nishiyama, N; Sawai, T; Takahashi, H; Takemura, M; Tanaka, K; Tatsuta, T; Uhl, GR; Watabe, K, 2013
)
0.39
" Dose-response functions were then established under fixed- and progressive-ratio (FR and PR) schedules over three subsequent weeks of testing."( High levels of intravenous mephedrone (4-methylmethcathinone) self-administration in rats: neural consequences and comparison with methamphetamine.
Apetz, N; Bowen, MT; Callaghan, PD; Clemens, KJ; Cornish, JL; Li, KM; McGregor, IS; Motbey, CP; Ramsey, J; Winstock, AR; Wyatt, N, 2013
)
0.39
"Mice were treated using a repeated dosing paradigm and body temperatures recorded."( σ Receptor antagonist attenuation of methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity is correlated to body temperature modulation.
Coop, A; Matsumoto, RR; McCurdy, CR; Robson, MJ; Seminerio, MJ, 2013
)
0.39
" The change in gray matter before and after the dosing regimen was compared to the change in the behavioral performance and in dopaminergic markers measured with PET."( Methamphetamine-induced increases in putamen gray matter associate with inhibitory control.
Groman, SM; Jentsch, JD; Lee, B; London, ED; Morales, AM, 2013
)
0.39
"The results provide the first evidence that exposure to a methamphetamine dosing regimen that resembles human use alters the structural integrity of the striatum and that gray-matter abnormalities detected in human methamphetamine users are due, at least in part, to the pharmacological effects of drug experience."( Methamphetamine-induced increases in putamen gray matter associate with inhibitory control.
Groman, SM; Jentsch, JD; Lee, B; London, ED; Morales, AM, 2013
)
0.39
", following repeated daily exposure), and across context-independent and -dependent dosing schedules."( Mephedrone (4-methylmethcathinone), a principal constituent of psychoactive bath salts, produces behavioral sensitization in rats.
Gregg, RA; McCurdy, C; Rawls, SM; Reitz, A; Tallarida, CS, 2013
)
0.39
" Although mean daily MA dosage did not differ between the MAP+ and MAP- subjects, MAP+ subjects who consumed larger doses of MA were significantly more likely to experience frequent psychosis."( Predictors of methamphetamine psychosis: history of ADHD-relevant childhood behaviors and drug exposure.
Carter, C; Fassbender, C; Iosif, AM; Leamon, MH; Salo, R; Ursu, S, 2013
)
0.39
" However, it is currently unknown if the acute toxic dosage of METH also causes a long-lasting depressive phenotype and persistent monoaminergic deficits."( A single neurotoxic dose of methamphetamine induces a long-lasting depressive-like behaviour in mice.
Cunha, RA; de Oliveira, PA; Dias, AI; Fontes Ribeiro, CA; Freitas, HJ; Mendes, SM; Neves, AF; Pereira, FC; Pita, I; Prediger, RD; Silva, CD; Viana, SD, 2014
)
0.4
" Agmatine pretreatment therefore appears to produce a rightward shift in the dose-response curve for METH."( Agmatine attenuates methamphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion and stereotyped behavior in mice.
Hall, FS; Kitanaka, J; Kitanaka, N; Kubo, H; Nishiyama, N; Takahashi, H; Takemura, M; Tanaka, K; Uhl, GR; Watabe, K, 2014
)
0.4
" Adult rodents exhibit impairments specific to reversal learning across various dosing regimens of methamphetamine (mAMPH)."( Long-term effects of exposure to methamphetamine in adolescent rats.
Izquierdo, A; Phillips, TJ; Pozos, H; Ye, T, 2014
)
0.4
" Four 25 mg/kg injections of mephedrone increased NT content in basal ganglia (striatum, substantia nigra and globus pallidus) and the limbic regions (nucleus accumbens core), while a lower dosage (5 mg/kg/injection) only increased striatal NT content."( Mephedrone alters basal ganglia and limbic neurotensin systems.
Fleckenstein, AE; German, CL; Hanson, GR; Hoonakker, AH, 2014
)
0.4
" The secondary aims were to investigate a possible dose-response CPP and whether the synthetic cathinones induce higher CPP than amphetamine at equal dose."( Mephedrone, methylone and 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV) induce conditioned place preference in mice.
Andersson, M; Karlsson, L; Kronstrand, R; Kugelberg, FC, 2014
)
0.4
"The repeated administration of methamphetamine (MA) to animals in a single-day 'binge' dosing regimen produces damage to dopamine and serotonin terminals and psychosis-like behaviours similar to those observed in MA abusers."( Long-lasting alterations in 5-HT2A receptor after a binge regimen of methamphetamine in mice.
Chan, MH; Chen, HH; Chen, ST; Chiu, HY; Lee, MY; Zhan, ZY, 2014
)
0.4
"Repeated administration of methamphetamine (mAMPH) to rodents in a single-day "binge" dosing regimen produces long-lasting damage to forebrain dopaminergic nerve terminals as measured by decreases in tissue dopamine (DA) content and levels of the plasmalemmal DA transporter (DAT)."( Running wheel exercise before a binge regimen of methamphetamine does not protect against striatal dopaminergic damage.
Marshall, JF; O'dell, SJ, 2014
)
0.4
"2 mg/kg) increased the GBO power, exhibiting an inverted U-shape dose-response curve; at higher doses (0."( Differential effects of NMDA receptor antagonists at lower and higher doses on basal gamma band oscillation power in rat cortical electroencephalograms.
Chaki, S; Hiyoshi, T; Kambe, D; Karasawa, J, 2014
)
0.4
" Testing for purity, "allergy testing," and gauging of dosage were common."( An Internet Study of User's Experiences of the Synthetic Cathinone 4-Methylethcathinone (4-MEC).
Van Hout, MC,
)
0.13
"Methamphetamine (4mg/kg)-induced place preference mice model was successfully established; ketamine (15mg/kg), rhynchophylline (40mg/kg) and rhynchophylline (80mg/kg) can eliminate place preference; Immunohistochemistry showed that the number of NR2B-positive neurons in hippocampus was increased in the methamphetamine model group, whereas less NR2B-positive neurons were found in the ketamine group, low and high dosage rhynchophylline group."( Effect of rhynchophylline on conditioned place preference on expression of NR2B in methamphetamine-dependent mice.
Fang, M; Guo, Y; Jiang, M; Li, J; Liu, W; Liu, Y; Luo, C; Mo, Z; Peng, Q, 2014
)
0.4
" METH serum concentrations determined 5h after METH dosing was significantly increased in mAb7F9-treated rats after all METH challenges."( Treatment of rats with an anti-(+)-methamphetamine monoclonal antibody shortens the duration of action of repeated (+)-methamphetamine challenges over a one month period.
Hambuchen, MD; Hendrickson, H; Owens, SM; Rüedi-Bettschen, D; Williams, DK, 2014
)
0.4
"3 mg/kg/injection cocaine or MA) choice paradigm in which complete SA dose-response curves were determined each session (N = 3/group)."( Effects of buspirone and the dopamine D3 receptor compound PG619 on cocaine and methamphetamine self-administration in rhesus monkeys using a food-drug choice paradigm.
Banala, AK; John, WS; Nader, MA; Newman, AH, 2015
)
0.42
") in daily 2-hour sessions for 10 days under a fixed ratio 1 (FR1) reinforcement schedule, followed by determination of dose-response functions (0."( Adolescent pre-treatment with oxytocin protects against adult methamphetamine-seeking behavior in female rats.
Baracz, SJ; Cornish, JL; Hicks, C; McGregor, IS; Suraev, A, 2016
)
0.43
" In the conditioned place-preference assay, DMAA produced an inverted-U-shaped dose-response curve, with intermediate doses producing significant place preference."( Abuse liability of the dietary supplement dimethylamylamine.
Dolan, SB; Gatch, MB, 2015
)
0.42
" Eight male rhesus monkeys (n=4/group) served as subjects in which complete cocaine and MA dose-response curves were determined daily in each session."( Differential effects of the dopamine D3 receptor antagonist PG01037 on cocaine and methamphetamine self-administration in rhesus monkeys.
John, WS; Nader, MA; Newman, AH, 2015
)
0.42
" Thus, it appears that methamphetamine under certain circumstances and correct dosing can produce a neuroprotective effect."( The neuroprotective potential of low-dose methamphetamine in preclinical models of stroke and traumatic brain injury.
Poulsen, D; Rau, T; Ziemniak, J, 2016
)
0.43
" While wildtype mice show significant losses in striatal levels of the dopamine transporter (65% loss) and tyrosine hydroxylase (46% loss) following a 4 × 10 mg/kg METH dosing regimen, VMAT2-HI mice were protected from this damage."( Increased Vesicular Monoamine Transporter 2 (VMAT2; Slc18a2) Protects against Methamphetamine Toxicity.
Dunn, AR; Guillot, TS; Lohr, KM; Miller, GW; Salahpour, A; Stout, KA; Wang, M, 2015
)
0.42
"For the studies, we used a passive (non-contingent) METH dosing schedule consisting of 27 METH iv bolus injections (0."( The pharmacokinetics of methamphetamine self-administration in male and female rats.
Hambuchen, MD; McMillan, DE; Michael Owens, S; Milesi-Hallé, A, 2015
)
0.42
" The dosage of δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) suggests a recent cannabis consumption (THC 12."( Death following ingestion of methylone.
Barrios, L; Boels, D; Bouquie, R; Clement, R; Grison-Hernando, H; Monteil-Ganiere, C, 2016
)
0.43
"05mg/kg/inf dose condition, MH6-KLH-vaccinated rats initially self-administered more METH than controls, but then self-administration decreased across the acquisition phase relative to controls; a subsequent dose-response assessment confirmed that MH6-KLH-vaccinated rats failed to acquire METH self-administration."( Effects of active anti-methamphetamine vaccination on intravenous self-administration in rats.
Aarde, SM; Creehan, KM; Janda, KD; Miller, ML; Moreno, AY; Taffe, MA, 2015
)
0.42
" Adult male mice underwent a binge dosing regimen of four injections given every 2h with doses of 2, 4, 6, or 8 mg/kg MA per injection, and were sacrificed after 1, 3, 7, or 14 days."( Characterization of binge-dosed methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity and neuroinflammation.
Cory-Slechta, DA; McConnell, SE; O'Banion, MK; Olschowka, JA; Opanashuk, LA, 2015
)
0.42
" As relatively new drugs on the gay scene, understanding of appropriate dosing was lacking and a majority described overdoses, particularly in relation to GHB/GBL."( "Chemsex" and harm reduction need among gay men in South London.
Bourne, A; Hickson, F; Reid, D; Steinberg, P; Torres-Rueda, S; Weatherburn, P, 2015
)
0.42
" Multiple-day dosing with METH enhanced DNA oxidation and decreased tyrosine hydroxylase and dopamine transporter staining in the striatum, indicating dopaminergic nerve terminal toxicity, which was more severe in -/- mice, as were deficits in motor coordination and olfactory discrimination."( Methamphetamine oxidative stress, neurotoxicity, and functional deficits are modulated by nuclear factor-E2-related factor 2.
Ramkissoon, A; Wells, PG, 2015
)
0.42
" The urine of rats dosed with a subcutaneous bolus dose of 20mg 4-MMC/kg was analysed by LC/MS."( Metabolic profile of mephedrone: Identification of nor-mephedrone conjugates with dicarboxylic acids as a new type of xenobiotic phase II metabolites.
Balíková, M; Himl, M; Lhotková, E; Linhart, I; Páleníček, T; Židková, M, 2016
)
0.43
"MA users have high rates of dental and periodontal disease and manifest a dose-response relationship, with greater levels of MA use associated with higher rates of dental disease."( Dental disease patterns in methamphetamine users: Findings in a large urban sample.
Belin, TR; Dye, BA; Gutierrez, A; Harrell, L; Murphy, DA; Shetty, V; Spolsky, VW; Vitero, S, 2015
)
0.42
"32 mg/kg/h, IV) dose-dependently decreased cocaine-maintained responding; the highest dosage reduced cocaine intake to levels of saline self-administration without appreciable effects on food-maintained responding."( Effects of L-methamphetamine treatment on cocaine- and food-maintained behavior in rhesus monkeys.
Bergman, J; Blough, BE; Kohut, SJ, 2016
)
0.43
"The present study integrated behavioral and neuroelectric approaches for determining the dose-response relationships between exercise intensity and methamphetamine (MA) craving and between exercise intensity and inhibitory control in individuals with MA dependence."( Dose-response relationships between exercise intensity, cravings, and inhibitory control in methamphetamine dependence: An ERPs study.
Chang, YK; Wang, D; Wu, X; Zhao, M; Zhou, C, 2016
)
0.43
"Adult, non-treatment seeking, MA-dependent volunteers (N=11) received oral placebo, moderate ibudilast (40 mg), and high-dose ibudilast (100mg) via twice-daily dosing for 7 days each in an inpatient setting."( Ibudilast attenuates subjective effects of methamphetamine in a placebo-controlled inpatient study.
Heinzerling, KG; Roche, DJ; Shoptaw, S; Swanson, A-N; Worley, MJ, 2016
)
0.43
"25 and 20 mg/kg), the dosing regime (acute, binge or chronic), the time of measurement of oxidative stress (0."( The Role of Oxidative Stress in Methamphetamine-induced Toxicity and Sources of Variation in the Design of Animal Studies.
Kelly, JP; McDonnell-Dowling, K, 2017
)
0.46
" The lack of a classic dose-response function likely results from either nonspecific effects of perindopril or from between-group differences that were not accounted for in the current study (i."( Subjective and Cardiovascular Effects of Intravenous Methamphetamine during Perindopril Maintenance: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Human Laboratory Study.
De La Garza, R; Grasing, K; Haile, CN; Kosten, TR; Newton, TF; Verrico, CD, 2016
)
0.43
"12mg/kg/infusion) were tested, producing an inverted U-shaped dose-response curve."( The differential effects of alprazolam and oxazepam on methamphetamine self-administration in rats.
Goeders, NE; Guerin, GF; Spence, AL, 2016
)
0.43
"Oxazepam significantly reduced methamphetamine self-administration as demonstrated by a downward shift of the dose-response curve."( The differential effects of alprazolam and oxazepam on methamphetamine self-administration in rats.
Goeders, NE; Guerin, GF; Spence, AL, 2016
)
0.43
" In sub-analysis, consistent dose-response patterns were observed between levels of alcohol use and unprotected sex, homelessness, and daily heroin injection."( Unsafe sexual behaviour associated with hazardous alcohol use among street-involved youth.
DeBeck, K; Dong, H; Fairbairn, N; Kerr, T; Wood, E, 2017
)
0.46
" These patients require close monitoring for adverse effects with adjustment of dosing to ensure the optimal balance of risk versus benefit while the patient is acutely psychotic."( Polysubstance-induced relapse of schizoaffective disorder refractory to high-dose antipsychotic medications: a case report.
Harvey, R; Kekulawala, S; Kent, M; Mostafa, S; Tucker, MG, 2016
)
0.43
" Chronic buspirone dosing studies remain to be conducted, but given preclinical findings and the outcomes of this work, the utility of buspirone for treating methamphetamine use disorder appears limited."( Acute buspirone dosing enhances abuse-related subjective effects of oral methamphetamine.
Pike, E; Rush, CR; Stoops, WW,
)
0.13
" Ketamine (150μg/g), high dose of rhynchophylline (100μg/g) group can significantly reduce the place preference; immunohistochemistry results showed that the number of TH-positive neurons in midbrain was increased in the methamphetamine model group, whereas less TH-positive neurons were found in the ketamine group and high dosage rhynchophylline group."( Inhibiting effects of rhynchophylline on methamphetamine-dependent zebrafish are related with the expression of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH).
Chen, M; Fang, M; Li, C; Lin, Y; Liu, W; Liu, Y; Luo, C; Mo, Z; Ou, J; Yung, KK; Zhu, C; Zhu, D, 2017
)
0.46
" In addition, the relatively long-lasting and recurrent nature of MA psychosis has been reproduced in animals treated with various dosing regimens of MA, which have shown behavioral sensitization, sociability deficits, and impaired prepulse inhibition."( Current understanding of methamphetamine-associated dopaminergic neurodegeneration and psychotoxic behaviors.
Dang, DK; Jang, CG; Jeong, JH; Kim, HC; Nabeshima, T; Nah, SY; Shin, EJ; Tran, HQ; Tran, TV; Yamada, K, 2017
)
0.46
" The acute effects of binge dosing of methamphetamine on the neurons in the CNS are well studied."( Chronic methamphetamine exposure significantly decreases microglia activation in the arcuate nucleus.
Bruster, MC; Corkill, B; Lloyd, SA; Roberts, RL; Shanks, RA, 2017
)
0.46
"The inverted U-shaped, methamphetamine dose-response function for intake on the fixed ratio 5 schedule was shifted downward by CP 94,253 both before and after abstinence."( Preclinical Evidence That 5-HT1B Receptor Agonists Show Promise as Medications for Psychostimulant Use Disorders.
Cotter, AR; Garcia, R; Leslie, K; Neisewander, JL; Olive, MF, 2017
)
0.46
" Three new phase II metabolites, amidic conjugates of MDC with succinic, glutaric and adipic acid, were identified in the urine of rats dosed subcutaneously with MDMC."( Identification of three new phase II metabolites of a designer drug methylone formed in rats by N-demethylation followed by conjugation with dicarboxylic acids.
Balíková, M; Dvořáčková, V; Himl, M; Lhotková, E; Linhart, I; Páleníček, T; Židková, M, 2018
)
0.48
" Dose-response curves were then generated with AMPH (0."( Effects of D1 and D2 receptor antagonists on the discriminative stimulus effects of methylendioxypyrovalerone and mephedrone in male Sprague-Dawley rats trained to discriminate D-amphetamine.
Baker, LE; Burroughs, RL; Harvey, EL, 2017
)
0.46
"32 mg/kg/inf) under a fixed ratio (FR) 1 schedule of reinforcement; and (2) full dose-response curves for each drug to maintain responding under an FR5 schedule of reinforcement."( Relative reinforcing effects of second-generation synthetic cathinones: Acquisition of self-administration and fixed ratio dose-response curves in rats.
Collins, GT; Galindo, KI; Gannon, BM; Mesmin, MP; Rice, KC; Sulima, A, 2018
)
0.48
" Collectively, this data highlights the importance of the frontal cortex in methamphetamine-induced effects, and also the similar dose-response effect of methamphetamine on dopamine and BDNF expression."( Dose-Dependent Effects of Binge-Like Methamphetamine Dosing on Dopamine and Neurotrophin Levels in Rat Brain.
Doyle, KM; Kelly, JP; Moreira da Silva Santos, A, 2017
)
0.46
" In rodents, there are MA dosing regimens that induce concordant effects using repeated administration at spaced intervals."( A Single High Dose of Methamphetamine Reduces Monoamines and Impairs Egocentric and Allocentric Learning and Memory in Adult Male Rats.
Gutierrez, A; Vorhees, CV; Williams, MT, 2018
)
0.48
" A dose-response relationship was found between duration of MA use and risk of psychiatric symptoms."( Profile of psychiatric symptoms in methamphetamine users in China: Greater risk of psychiatric symptoms with a longer duration of use.
Bao, YP; Han, Y; Li, SX; Liu, MX; Lu, L; Ma, J; Meng, SQ; Shi, J; Su, MF; Sun, XJ; Wang, RJ; Wang, TY; Wu, P, 2018
)
0.48
" MA activates the neurotransmitter system and the central nervous system, and when used at high dosage or for long term, MA can cause severe neurotoxicity and cardiovascular problems."( A commentary on the effects of methamphetamine and the status of methamphetamine abuse among youths in South Korea, Japan, and China.
Han, E; Kwon, NJ, 2018
)
0.48
" Following a completed dose-response curve, responding for methamphetamine self-administration was extinguished and the effects of N-acetylcysteine or bupropion on methamphetamine-triggered reinstatement was evaluated in separate experiments."( The effect of N-acetylcysteine or bupropion on methamphetamine self-administration and methamphetamine-triggered reinstatement of female rats.
Bevins, RA; Charntikov, S; Pittenger, ST; Pudiak, CM, 2018
)
0.48
" A dose-response effect was found between the duration of MA use and the risk of psychotic symptoms (continued 12-month MA use vs."( Relationship between the duration of methamphetamine use and psychotic symptoms: A two-year prospective cohort study.
Bao, YP; Blow, FC; Degenhardt, L; Ilgen, M; Lappin, J; Li, SX; Li, XD; Lu, L; Ma, J; Meng, SQ; Shi, J; Wang, TY; Wu, P, 2018
)
0.48
"This paper describes a new method to rapidly obtain dose-response curves for a drug with rewarding properties using the conditioned place preference protocol."( Rapid assessment of the dose-response relationship of methamphetamine using the progressive-dosing procedure.
Watanabe, S, 2019
)
0.51
" Neither acute nor chronic dosing produced a change in locomotion during the EPM, indicating that the anxiolytic effects of MPH are independent of changes in locomotor behavior."( A recreational dose of methylphenidate, but not methamphetamine, decreases anxiety-like behavior in female rats.
Boyette-Davis, JA; Gonzalez, CMF; Guarraci, FA; Kunkel, MN; Lucero, DA; Rice, HR; Shoubaki, RI; Womble, PD, 2018
)
0.48
" Anti-METH monoclonal antibodies can reduce METH brain concentrations; however, this therapy has limitations, including the need for repeated dosing throughout the course of addiction recovery."( Development and testing of AAV-delivered single-chain variable fragments for the treatment of methamphetamine abuse.
Alam, S; Bolden, CT; Ewing, LE; Gonzalez, GA; Hambuchen, MD; Hay, CE; Margaritis, P; Nanaware-Kharade, N; Owens, SM; Peterson, EC; Reichard, EE, 2018
)
0.48
"6 mg/kg) produced a significant downward shift in the d-methamphetamine dose-response function; surprisingly, lower and higher pretreatment doses (3."( Limited modulation of the abuse-related behavioral effects of d-methamphetamine by disulfiram.
Bergman, J; de Moura, FB; Kohut, SJ, 2018
)
0.48
" The results demonstrated a U-shaped dose-response curve for the reinforcing effects of meth in that the intermediate dose group (0."( Methamphetamine self-administration in a runway model of drug-seeking behavior in male rats.
Akhiary, M; Ettenberg, A; Klein, AK; Purvis, EM, 2018
)
0.48
"32 mg/kg/inf) under a fixed ratio (FR) 1 schedule of reinforcement and generated full dose-response curves for methylone (0."( Behavioral economic analysis of the reinforcing effects of "bath salts" mixtures: studies with MDPV, methylone, and caffeine in male Sprague-Dawley rats.
Collins, GT; Gannon, BM; Mesmin, MP; Rice, KC; Sulima, A, 2019
)
0.51
"Future randomized clinical trials are needed to investigate proper dosing strategy in a more inclusive sample."( Riluzole for treatment of men with methamphetamine dependence: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Akhondzadeh, S; Bidaki, R; Farahzadi, MH; Moazen-Zadeh, E; Razaghi, E; Zarrindast, MR, 2019
)
0.51
"Baseline data were analyzed from the STimulant Reduction Intervention using Dosed Exercise trial, a multisite randomized clinical trial that evaluated exercise versus health education on drug use outcomes in individuals with stimulant use disorders."( The Stimulant Selective Severity Assessment: A replication and exploratory extension of the Cocaine Selective Severity Assessment.
Bernstein, I; Greer, TL; Northrup, TF; Tillitski, J; Trivedi, MH; Walker, R, 2019
)
0.51
" We examine the feasibility, utility, and acceptability of using smartphones to capture dosing videos from the perspectives of participants and staff."( Medication Adherence Monitoring Using Smartphone Video Dosing in an Open-label Pilot Study of Monthly Naltrexone Plus Once-daily Bupropion for Methamphetamine Use Disorder: Feasibility and Acceptability.
Hillhouse, M; Ling, W; Mooney, L; Perrochet, B; Sparenborg, S; Walker, R,
)
0.13
" BRP was dispensed once weekly for dosing on nonclinic days."( Medication Adherence Monitoring Using Smartphone Video Dosing in an Open-label Pilot Study of Monthly Naltrexone Plus Once-daily Bupropion for Methamphetamine Use Disorder: Feasibility and Acceptability.
Hillhouse, M; Ling, W; Mooney, L; Perrochet, B; Sparenborg, S; Walker, R,
)
0.13
"6% of dispensed doses were confirmed via dosing video and in-person observations."( Medication Adherence Monitoring Using Smartphone Video Dosing in an Open-label Pilot Study of Monthly Naltrexone Plus Once-daily Bupropion for Methamphetamine Use Disorder: Feasibility and Acceptability.
Hillhouse, M; Ling, W; Mooney, L; Perrochet, B; Sparenborg, S; Walker, R,
)
0.13
"The use of smartphones for video-based oral medication dosing in this study provided a feasible and acceptable mechanism to encourage, monitor, and confirm medication adherence."( Medication Adherence Monitoring Using Smartphone Video Dosing in an Open-label Pilot Study of Monthly Naltrexone Plus Once-daily Bupropion for Methamphetamine Use Disorder: Feasibility and Acceptability.
Hillhouse, M; Ling, W; Mooney, L; Perrochet, B; Sparenborg, S; Walker, R,
)
0.13
" Previous studies reveals evidence for both positive and negative effects of Meth pertaining to cognitive functioning based on the dosage paradigm and duration of exposure revealing a beneficial psychotropic profile under some conditions and deleterious cognitive deficits under some others."( Methamphetamine regulates βAPP processing in human neuroblastoma cells.
Govitrapong, P; Hernandez, JF; Maitra, S; Shukla, M; Vincent, B, 2019
)
0.51
" Moreover, along with the increases of dosage and duration of use (from group A to group C, group A: 1-2 g/day, <2 years; group B: 2-3 g/day, 2-5 years; group C: >3 g/day, >5 years) the reductions in the myocardial perfusion indices were more significant (p<0."( Evaluation of regional myocardial perfusion in methamphetamine abusers using real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography.
Chen, KQ; Qiao, XL; Shi, YY; Wang, LY; Zheng, XZ, 2019
)
0.51
"In this study, we created a mouse model of methamphetamine cardiomyopathy that reproduces the chronic, progressive dosing commonly encountered in addicted subjects."( Sex influences susceptibility to methamphetamine cardiomyopathy in mice.
Darrow, AL; Marcinko, MC; Shohet, RV; Tuia, AJ, 2019
)
0.51
" It responded to the dosage of anti-MA in spiked blood samples with satisfactory recovery."( A Convenient Electrochemiluminescent Immunosensor for Detecting Methamphetamine Antibody.
Liu, C; Tu, Y; Wang, X; Yang, Y; Zhai, S, 2019
)
0.51
" This is the rationale for the METH model of PD developed by toxic METH dosing (10 mg/kg four times every 2 h) which features robust neurodegeneration and typical motor impairment in mice."( Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Detects Microstructural Changes in a Methamphetamine-Induced Mouse Model of Parkinson's Disease.
Arab, A; Drazanova, E; Khairnar, A; Minsterova, A; Rektorova, I; Ruda-Kucerova, J; Starcuk, Z; Szabó, N, 2019
)
0.51
" In experiment 1, the acquisition of l- or d-METH self-administration followed by dose-response determinations was studied."( Effects of methamphetamine isomers on d-methamphetamine self-administration and food-maintained responding in male rats.
Bardo, MT; Bergman, J; Blough, BE; Denehy, ED; Dwoskin, LP; Hammerslag, LR; Kohut, SJ; Landavazo, A, 2019
)
0.51
" However, respective intragastrical administration of NTX (20 or 40 mg/kg) failed to alter the dose-response curve of METH under fixed ratio 2 program and intraperitoneal injection of METH (1."( Inhibition of naltrexone on relapse in methamphetamine self-administration and conditioned place preference in rats.
Dong, GM; Guo, LK; Li, J; Lu, GY; Ma, CM; Song, R; Wang, ZY; Wu, N; Zhang, RL, 2019
)
0.51
"Pseudoephedrine (PSE) extracted from its dosage forms can be used as the starting material to prepare methamphetamine by drug abusers."( Evaluation of commercially available meth-deterrent pseudoephedrine hydrochloride products.
Alayoubi, AY; Aqueel, MS; Ashraf, M; Chen, J; Cruz, CN; Korang-Yeboah, M; Rahman, Z; Zidan, AS, 2020
)
0.56
" The dose-response profiles were explored via associations between heaviest methamphetamine use frequency from age 18-35 and violence outcomes in that period."( Methamphetamine use and violence: Findings from a longitudinal birth cohort.
Boden, JM; Foulds, JA; McKetin, R; Newton-Howes, G, 2020
)
0.56
"25 at study level) and amphetamine/methamphetamine urinary concentration ratios (AAFE < 2 at individual level) after dosing methamphetamine."( Mechanistic PBPK Modeling of Urine pH Effect on Renal and Systemic Disposition of Methamphetamine and Amphetamine.
Czuba, LC; Huang, W; Isoherranen, N, 2020
)
0.56
" D1RshRNA also produced a vertical shift in a dose-response paradigm and enhanced responding for methamphetamine in a progressive-ratio schedule, generating a drug-vulnerable phenotype."( In vivo reduction of striatal D1R by RNA interference alters expression of D1R signaling-related proteins and enhances methamphetamine addiction in male rats.
Head, BP; Kreisler, AD; Mandyam, CD; Purohit, DC; Somkuwar, SS; Terranova, MJ; Wang, S, 2020
)
0.56
" Intraperitoneal injections of METH at a dose of 10 mg/kg were administered to the rats in the METH and METH+TBHQ groups for one week, and METH was then administered at a dose that increased by 1 mg/kg per week until the sixth week, when the daily dosage reached 15 mg/kg."( TBHQ Attenuates Neurotoxicity Induced by Methamphetamine in the VTA through the Nrf2/HO-1 and PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathways.
Chu, H; Guo, Y; Han, Y; Kong, L; Ma, H; Meng, X; Wang, C; Zhang, C, 2020
)
0.56
" This may have clinical implications for drug dosing in female methamphetamine users of reproductive age."( Methamphetamine administration increases hepatic CYP1A2 but not CYP3A activity in female guinea pigs.
Berry, MJ; Clarkson, AN; Dyson, RM; Gray, CL; Morrison, JL; Soo, JY; Wiese, MD, 2020
)
0.56
" Larger prospective trials with protocolized vancomycin dosing strategies are needed to further elucidate the impact of methamphetamine use on attainment of goal vancomycin troughs in addition to the potential impact on vancomycin clearance."( Impact of Recent Methamphetamine Use on Vancomycin Clearance.
Laguado, SA; Vadiei, N; Yenina, K, 2020
)
0.56
" Adult C57BL/6J females underwent a 4-day MA place-conditioning paradigm (once daily injections of 2 mg/kg) and were then trained to nose-poke for delivery of a 20 mg/L MA solution under increasing schedules of reinforcement, followed by dose-response testing (5-400 mg/L MA)."( The motivational valence of methamphetamine relates inversely to subsequent methamphetamine self-administration in female C57BL/6J mice.
Brewin, LW; Brown, CN; Bryant, CD; Coelho, MA; Fultz, EK; Kippin, TE; Page, A; Shab, G; Stailey, N; Szumlinski, KK, 2021
)
0.62
", MDPV, αPVP, MCAT, and methylone) with a range of pharmacological effects at dopamine and serotonin transporters were compared to cocaine and MDMA using dose-response analysis under a simple FR schedule and behavioral economic procedures that generated demand curves for two doses of each drug."( Reinforcing effects of synthetic cathinones in rhesus monkeys: Dose-response and behavioral economic analyses.
Bergman, J; de Moura, FB; Kohut, SJ; Paronis, CA; Prisinzano, TE; Sherwood, A, 2021
)
0.62
" These data suggest age modulates the locomotor response to MA and further research is warranted to determine the developmental neurobiological mechanism underlying the dose-response age differences in the response to acute MA exposure."( The acute effects of multiple doses of methamphetamine on locomotor activity and anxiety-like behavior in adolescent and adult mice.
Acevedo, J; Newby, ML; Ortman, HA; Siegel, JA, 2021
)
0.62
" A dose-response relationship between the number of ACEs and suicide rate was observed among individuals with METH use."( Exploring the mediating role of methamphetamine use in the relationship between adverse childhood experiences and attempted suicide.
Chen, YY; Fang, SC; Huang, MC; Lee, WC; Liu, HC; McKetin, R, 2021
)
0.62
" LV-Cav1 and LV-shCav1 also produced an upward and downward shift in a dose-response paradigm, generating a drug vulnerable/resistant phenotype."( Caveolin-1 Expression in the Dorsal Striatum Drives Methamphetamine Addiction-Like Behavior.
Avchalumov, Y; Head, BP; Kreisler, AD; Mandyam, CD; Nayak, M; Piña-Crespo, JC; Trenet, W, 2021
)
0.62
" dosing and dispensation protocols) can be adjusted to allow for various scenarios (e."( Exploring the effectiveness of dextroamphetamine for the treatment of stimulant use disorder: a qualitative study with patients receiving injectable opioid agonist treatment.
Bojanczyk-Shibata, A; Harrison, S; Jun, J; Lock, K; MacDonald, S; Marchand, K; Marsh, DC; Oviedo-Joekes, E; Palis, H; Peachey, GS; Schechter, MT; Westfall, J, 2021
)
0.62
" Female and male mice of both substrains were first trained to nose poke for a 100 mg/L MA solution followed by a characterization of the dose-response function for oral MA reinforcement (20 mg/L-3."( Selective Inhibition of PDE4B Reduces Methamphetamine Reinforcement in Two C57BL/6 Substrains.
Doren, EV; Honeywell, KM; Szumlinski, KK, 2022
)
0.72
" Following the training, dose substitution was used to generate full dose-response curves for METH and the three synthetic cathinones."( Relative reinforcing effects of dibutylone, ethylone, and N-ethylpentylone: self-administration and behavioral economics analysis in rats.
Du, H; Fu, D; Lai, M; Liu, H; Wang, Y; Xu, P; Xu, Z; Zhou, W, 2022
)
0.72
"Dibutylone, ethylone, and N-ethylpentylone functioned as reinforcers, and the inverted U-shaped dose-response curves were obtained."( Relative reinforcing effects of dibutylone, ethylone, and N-ethylpentylone: self-administration and behavioral economics analysis in rats.
Du, H; Fu, D; Lai, M; Liu, H; Wang, Y; Xu, P; Xu, Z; Zhou, W, 2022
)
0.72
" Data collected included baseline demographics, history of illicit drug use, temporal trend in methadone dosage modulation, and co-use of illicit drugs during the MMT."( Methadone Maintenance Treatment for Opioid Dependents: a Retrospective Study.
Abdul Rashid, Q; Jamaluddin, R; Khalid, K; Mohammad Yusoff, MZA; Ooi, YT, 2022
)
0.72
" MA dependence and dosing explained together 44."( Increased Lipid Peroxidation and Lowered Antioxidant Defenses Predict Methamphetamine Induced Psychosis.
Al-Hakeim, HK; Almulla, AF; Altufaili, MF; Maes, M; Moustafa, SR, 2022
)
0.72
"Our study investigated whether chronic exposure to methamphetamine (METH), at a dose designed to emulate human therapeutic dosing for ADHD, would promote biochemical alterations and affect sensitivity to the rewarding effects of subsequent METH dosing."( Effects of chronic methamphetamine exposure on rewarding behavior and neurodegeneration markers in adult mice.
Davis, DL; Forster, MJ; Metzger, DB; Shetty, RA; Sumien, N; Vann, PH; Wong, JM, 2023
)
0.91
"When treating opioid users with polydrug drug use, special attention should be paid to dosing when in opioid agonist methadone/buprenorphine treatment and to the presence of physical pain."( Predictors and motives of polydrug use in opioid users. A narrative review.
Pierce, M; van Amsterdam, J; van den Brink, W, 2023
)
0.91
"Based on previous studies of vaginal lubrication as well as our own previously reported interview study of women who self-reported methamphetamine (meth)-induced vaginal lubrication, in the current study we sought to determine the potential dose-response relationship leading to meth-induced vaginal lubrication."( Methamphetamine-induced vaginal lubrication in rats.
Goeders, NE; Mott, MN, 2023
)
0.91
" Here, we show nanostructured EGCG/ascorbic acid nanoparticles (EGCG/AA NPs) dose-dependently reduced METH self-administration (SA) under fixed-ratio 1 (FR1) and progressive ratio (PR) reinforcement schedules in mice and shifted METH dose-response curves downward."( EGCG attenuates METH self-administration and reinstatement of METH seeking in mice.
Gong, X; Huang, J; Li, L; Lin, S; Liu, Y; Qian, L; Ruan, Y; Si, Z; Wang, X; Yu, Z, 2023
)
0.91
" Intra-VTA infusion of SB334867 throughout the extinction phase could remarkably facilitate the extinction process and decrease the maintenance of reinforcing effects of METH at the highest dosage (10 nmol; p < 0."( The role of orexin-1 receptors within the ventral tegmental area in the extinction and reinstatement of methamphetamine place preference.
Amirteymori, H; Fattahi, M; Haghparast, A; Mousavi, Z; Zamanirad, F, 2023
)
0.91
" Opinions on preferred dosing varied, with some preferring longer acting medications for convenience, while others preferred daily dosing that would align with existing routines."( A qualitative study of interest in and preferences for potential medications to treat methamphetamine use disorder.
Fiuty, P; Harding, RW; Marks, C; Page, K; Wagner, KD, 2023
)
0.91
" Additional studies (including controlled dose-response studies) that examine the effects and safety of co-administering MDMA with psilocybin/LSD (in healthy controls and clinical samples) are warranted and may assist the development of personalized treatments."( Co-use of MDMA with psilocybin/LSD may buffer against challenging experiences and enhance positive experiences.
Carhart-Harris, RL; Erritzoe, D; Kettner, H; Mallard, A; Pagni, BA; Roberts, DE; Ross, S; Zeifman, RJ, 2023
)
0.91
"Understanding the dose-response relationship is crucial in studying the effects of brain stimulation techniques, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)."( Dose-response in modulating brain function with transcranial direct current stimulation: From local to network levels.
Ekhtiari, H; Kupliki, R; Paulus, M; Soleimani, G, 2023
)
0.91
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (5)

RoleDescription
neurotoxinA poison that interferes with the functions of the nervous system.
psychotropic drugA loosely defined grouping of drugs that have effects on psychological function.
central nervous system stimulantAny drug that enhances the activity of the central nervous system.
xenobioticA xenobiotic (Greek, xenos "foreign"; bios "life") is a compound that is foreign to a living organism. Principal xenobiotics include: drugs, carcinogens and various compounds that have been introduced into the environment by artificial means.
environmental contaminantAny minor or unwanted substance introduced into the environment that can have undesired effects.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (2)

ClassDescription
amphetaminesAmines that constitute a class of central nervous system stimulants based on the structure of the parent amphetamine 1-phenylpropan-2-amine.
secondary amineA compound formally derived from ammonia by replacing two hydrogen atoms by hydrocarbyl groups.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Pathways (1)

PathwayProteinsCompounds
4p16.3 copy number variation08

Protein Targets (11)

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Solute carrier family 22 member 3Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)248.00004.90006.65008.4000AID682029
Amine oxidase [flavin-containing] BRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki270.00000.00081.09276.0000AID125210
Amine oxidase [flavin-containing] BBos taurus (cattle)Ki550.00000.05401.83906.0000AID125205
Synaptic vesicular amine transporterRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki41.28000.00101.30096.2600AID1233246; AID778856
Sigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)Ki8.32000.00000.490110.0000AID203990
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Activation Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Sodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)0.92000.082031.0243168.9080AID635292
Sodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)1.30000.00112.38838.7000AID635296
Trace amine-associated receptor 1Macaca mulatta (Rhesus monkey)EC50 (µMol)5.30001.01002.57755.3000AID635287
Trace amine-associated receptor 1Mus musculus (house mouse)EC50 (µMol)0.62170.00200.69705.4000AID1066366; AID1066368; AID1066370; AID635292; AID635293
Trace amine-associated receptor 1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)EC50 (µMol)0.81730.01390.42632.0440AID1066367; AID1066369; AID1066371; AID635289
Trace amine-associated receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)1.40000.01501.41437.1900AID635286; AID635296
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (43)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
monoamine transportSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transportSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmissionSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
response to painSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine uptakeSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neuron cellular homeostasisSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
amino acid transportSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine transportSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine uptake involved in synaptic transmissionSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
sodium ion transmembrane transportSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
monoamine transportSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
response to hypoxiaSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transportSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
response to nutrientSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
memorySodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
circadian rhythmSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
response to toxic substanceSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of serotonin secretionSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cerebellar granule cell precursor proliferationSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of synaptic transmission, dopaminergicSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
response to estradiolSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
social behaviorSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
vasoconstrictionSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
sperm ejaculationSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of neuron differentiationSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell cycleSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of organ growthSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
behavioral response to cocaineSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
enteric nervous system developmentSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
brain morphogenesisSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
serotonin uptakeSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarizationSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
platelet aggregationSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to retinoic acidSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to cGMPSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of thalamus sizeSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
conditioned place preferenceSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
sodium ion transmembrane transportSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
amino acid transportSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayTrace amine-associated receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
lipid transportSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
nervous system developmentSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled opioid receptor signaling pathwaySigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of neuron apoptotic processSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein homotrimerizationSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (27)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
actin bindingSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transmembrane transporter activitySodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter:sodium symporter activitySodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine:sodium symporter activitySodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine:sodium symporter activitySodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
monoamine transmembrane transporter activitySodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
alpha-tubulin bindingSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
beta-tubulin bindingSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
integrin bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
monoatomic cation channel activitySodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transmembrane transporter activitySodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
serotonin:sodium:chloride symporter activitySodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
monoamine transmembrane transporter activitySodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
antiporter activitySodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
syntaxin-1 bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
cocaine bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
sodium ion bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
nitric-oxide synthase bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
actin filament bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
serotonin bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
primary amine oxidase activityAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BBos taurus (cattle)
aliphatic amine oxidase activityAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BBos taurus (cattle)
monoamine oxidase activityAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BBos taurus (cattle)
G protein-coupled receptor activityTrace amine-associated receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
trace-amine receptor activityTrace amine-associated receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled opioid receptor activitySigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (28)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
plasma membraneSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
membraneSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell body membraneSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
presynaptic membraneSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
axonSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
focal adhesionSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
endosome membraneSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
endomembrane systemSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
presynaptic membraneSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
membrane raftSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
synapseSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic membraneSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
serotonergic synapseSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
synapseSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BBos taurus (cattle)
mitochondrial outer membraneAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BBos taurus (cattle)
plasma membraneTrace amine-associated receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear envelopeSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear inner membraneSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear outer membraneSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
lipid dropletSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic densitySigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
membraneSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
growth coneSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic vesicleSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
anchoring junctionSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic density membraneSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (74)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1066366Activation of mouse TAAR1 transmembrane domain 7 Tyr287(7.39)Asn mutant expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as stimulation of cAMP production after 1 hr by chemiluminescent assay2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-23, Volume: 57, Issue:2
Exploring the determinants of trace amine-associated receptor 1's functional selectivity for the stereoisomers of amphetamine and methamphetamine.
AID625283Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for elevated liver function tests2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID678722Covalent binding affinity to human liver microsomes assessed per mg of protein at 10 uM after 60 mins presence of NADPH2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID625280Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholecystitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID588212Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID625279Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for bilirubinemia2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1066364Activation of mouse wild type TAAR1 expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as stimulation of cAMP production at at 0.0001 to 100 uM after 1 hr by chemiluminescent assay relative to beta-phenylethylamine2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-23, Volume: 57, Issue:2
Exploring the determinants of trace amine-associated receptor 1's functional selectivity for the stereoisomers of amphetamine and methamphetamine.
AID1066368Activation of mouse TAAR1 transmembrane domain 6 Thr268(6.55)Met mutant expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as stimulation of cAMP production after 1 hr by chemiluminescent assay2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-23, Volume: 57, Issue:2
Exploring the determinants of trace amine-associated receptor 1's functional selectivity for the stereoisomers of amphetamine and methamphetamine.
AID1066372Activation of mouse TAAR1 Asp102(3.32)Ala mutant expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as stimulation of cAMP production at 0.0001 to 100 uM after 1 hr by chemiluminescent assay2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-23, Volume: 57, Issue:2
Exploring the determinants of trace amine-associated receptor 1's functional selectivity for the stereoisomers of amphetamine and methamphetamine.
AID540209Volume of distribution at steady state in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID540210Clearance in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID540213Half life in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID203990Binding affinity towards sigma opioid receptor in guinea pig cerebral homogenate using [3H]DTG as radioligand1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 34, Issue:3
Identification and exploitation of the sigma-opiate pharmacophore.
AID635292Activation of mouse TAAR1 expressed in human HEK293 cells assessed as accumulation of [3H]cAMP after 1 hr by liquid scintillation counting2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 19, Issue:23
Trace amine-associated receptor 1 is a stereoselective binding site for compounds in the amphetamine class.
AID781325pKa (acid-base dissociation constant) as determined by Liao ref: J Chem Info Model 20092014Pharmaceutical research, Apr, Volume: 31, Issue:4
Comparison of the accuracy of experimental and predicted pKa values of basic and acidic compounds.
AID635294Activation of chimeric rat-human expressed in human HEK293 cells assessed as accumulation of [3H]cAMP after 1 hr by liquid scintillation counting2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 19, Issue:23
Trace amine-associated receptor 1 is a stereoselective binding site for compounds in the amphetamine class.
AID1066359Selectivity ratio of EC50 for mouse wild type TAAR1 to EC50 for mouse TAAR1 transmembrane domain 6 Thr268(6.55)Met mutant2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-23, Volume: 57, Issue:2
Exploring the determinants of trace amine-associated receptor 1's functional selectivity for the stereoisomers of amphetamine and methamphetamine.
AID678714Inhibition of human CYP2C19 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using 3-butyryl-7-methoxycoumarin as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID1066361Activation of rat TAAR1 transmembrane domain 7 Asn287(7.39)Tyr mutant expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as stimulation of cAMP production at at 0.0001 to 100 uM after 1 hr by chemiluminescent assay relative to beta-phenylethylamine2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-23, Volume: 57, Issue:2
Exploring the determinants of trace amine-associated receptor 1's functional selectivity for the stereoisomers of amphetamine and methamphetamine.
AID625290Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver fatty2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID682266TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of TEA uptake (TEA: 20 uM, Methamphetamine: 5000 uM) in OCTN2-expressing HeLa cells1998Biochemical and biophysical research communications, May-29, Volume: 246, Issue:3
cDNA sequence, transport function, and genomic organization of human OCTN2, a new member of the organic cation transporter family.
AID625284Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic failure2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1442374Induction of stimulus generalization in rat trained to discriminate S(+)methamphetamine assessed as appropriate responding level to training drug by two lever method2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 04-13, Volume: 60, Issue:7
The 2014 Philip S. Portoghese Medicinal Chemistry Lectureship: The "Phenylalkylaminome" with a Focus on Selected Drugs of Abuse.
AID1066374Selectivity ratio of EC50 for rat TAAR1 transmembrane domain 6 Met268(6.55)Thr mutant to EC50 for rat wild type TAAR12014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-23, Volume: 57, Issue:2
Exploring the determinants of trace amine-associated receptor 1's functional selectivity for the stereoisomers of amphetamine and methamphetamine.
AID1233247Inhibition of VMAT2-mediated [3H]DA uptake in rat brain synaptic vesicles by liquid scintillation spectrometry2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-01, Volume: 25, Issue:13
Quinolyl analogues of norlobelane: novel potent inhibitors of [(3)H]dihydrotetrabenazine binding and [(3)H]dopamine uptake at the vesicular monoamine transporter-2.
AID625291Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver function tests abnormal2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID678721Metabolic stability in human liver microsomes assessed as GSH adduct formation at 100 uM after 90 mins by HPLC-MS analysis2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID1066363Activation of rat TAAR1 transmembrane domain 6 Met268(6.55)Thr mutant expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as stimulation of cAMP production at at 0.0001 to 100 uM after 1 hr by chemiluminescent assay relative to beta-phenylethylamine2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-23, Volume: 57, Issue:2
Exploring the determinants of trace amine-associated receptor 1's functional selectivity for the stereoisomers of amphetamine and methamphetamine.
AID588213Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in non-rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID625282Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cirrhosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1066370Activation of mouse wild type TAAR1 expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as stimulation of cAMP production after 1 hr by chemiluminescent assay2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-23, Volume: 57, Issue:2
Exploring the determinants of trace amine-associated receptor 1's functional selectivity for the stereoisomers of amphetamine and methamphetamine.
AID1066371Activation of rat wild type TAAR1 expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as stimulation of cAMP production after 1 hr by chemiluminescent assay2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-23, Volume: 57, Issue:2
Exploring the determinants of trace amine-associated receptor 1's functional selectivity for the stereoisomers of amphetamine and methamphetamine.
AID635293Activation of mouse TAAR1 expressed in human HEK293 cells assessed as accumulation of cAMP after 15 mins2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 19, Issue:23
Trace amine-associated receptor 1 is a stereoselective binding site for compounds in the amphetamine class.
AID1066367Activation of rat TAAR1 transmembrane domain 7 Asn287(7.39)Tyr mutant expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as stimulation of cAMP production after 1 hr by chemiluminescent assay2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-23, Volume: 57, Issue:2
Exploring the determinants of trace amine-associated receptor 1's functional selectivity for the stereoisomers of amphetamine and methamphetamine.
AID540212Mean residence time in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID681698TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of TEA uptake (TEA: 20 uM, Methanphetamine: 2500 uM) in OCTN2-expressing HRPE cells1999The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, Sep, Volume: 290, Issue:3
Functional characteristics and tissue distribution pattern of organic cation transporter 2 (OCTN2), an organic cation/carnitine transporter.
AID237685Lipophilicity determined as logarithm of the partition coefficient in the alkane/water system2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-05, Volume: 48, Issue:9
Calculating virtual log P in the alkane/water system (log P(N)(alk)) and its derived parameters deltalog P(N)(oct-alk) and log D(pH)(alk).
AID635287Activation of rhesus monkey TAAR1 expressed in RD-HGA16 cells co-expressing Gq protein assessed as cAMP accumulation by fluorescence plate reader2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 19, Issue:23
Trace amine-associated receptor 1 is a stereoselective binding site for compounds in the amphetamine class.
AID625289Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver disease2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1323834Displacement of [3H]rosiglitazone from recombinant human C-terminal His-tagged MitoNEET cytosolic domain (32 to 108 residues) expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 by scintillation proximity assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 11-01, Volume: 26, Issue:21
Identification of small molecules that bind to the mitochondrial protein mitoNEET.
AID625285Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic necrosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID635289Activation of rat TAAR1 expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as accumulation of [3H]cAMP after 1 hr by liquid scintillation counting2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 19, Issue:23
Trace amine-associated receptor 1 is a stereoselective binding site for compounds in the amphetamine class.
AID635286Activation of C-terminal HA epitope tagged human TAAR1 expressed in RD-HGA16 cells co-expressing Gq protein, Galpha16 by cAMP accumulation assay2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 19, Issue:23
Trace amine-associated receptor 1 is a stereoselective binding site for compounds in the amphetamine class.
AID1474167Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring verified drug-induced liver injury concern status2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID125205Inhibitory activity against Monoamine Oxidase B of Bovine liver in competitive inhibition assay at 25 degree C (pH=7.4)1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 31, Issue:8
Stereoisomers of allenic amines as inactivators of monoamine oxidase type B. Stereochemical probes of the active site.
AID540211Fraction unbound in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID678717Inhibition of human CYP3A4 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using 7-benzyloxyquinoline as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID678716Inhibition of human CYP3A4 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using diethoxyfluorescein as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID625292Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) combined score2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625288Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for jaundice2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1474166Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring severity class index2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID588211Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in humans2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID625287Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatomegaly2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID125210Competitive inhibition of Rat liver Monoamine Oxidase B at 37 degree C (pH= 7.4)1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 31, Issue:8
Stereoisomers of allenic amines as inactivators of monoamine oxidase type B. Stereochemical probes of the active site.
AID1066365Activation of rat wild type TAAR1 expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as stimulation of cAMP production at at 0.0001 to 100 uM after 1 hr by chemiluminescent assay relative to beta-phenylethylamine2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-23, Volume: 57, Issue:2
Exploring the determinants of trace amine-associated receptor 1's functional selectivity for the stereoisomers of amphetamine and methamphetamine.
AID1066360Activation of mouse TAAR1 transmembrane domain 7 Tyr287(7.39)Asn mutant expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as stimulation of cAMP production at at 0.0001 to 100 uM after 1 hr by chemiluminescent assay relative to beta-phenylethylamine2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-23, Volume: 57, Issue:2
Exploring the determinants of trace amine-associated receptor 1's functional selectivity for the stereoisomers of amphetamine and methamphetamine.
AID678712Inhibition of human CYP1A2 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using ethoxyresorufin as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID1233246Displacement of [3H]DTBZ from VMAT2 in rat whole brain by liquid scintillation spectrometry2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-01, Volume: 25, Issue:13
Quinolyl analogues of norlobelane: novel potent inhibitors of [(3)H]dihydrotetrabenazine binding and [(3)H]dopamine uptake at the vesicular monoamine transporter-2.
AID186425Effect on the spontaneous locomotor activity of rats at 0-60 min upon ip administration of the compounds at a dose of 100 mg/kg.1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 34, Issue:1
Synthesis, antibacterial activities, and pharmacological properties of enantiomers of temafloxacin hydrochloride.
AID678713Inhibition of human CYP2C9 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using 7-methoxy-4-trifluoromethylcoumarin-3-acetic acid as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID1233249Ratio of Ki for displacement of [3H]DTBZ from VMAT2 in rat whole brain to Ki for inhibition of VMAT2-mediated [3H]DA uptake in rat brain synaptic vesicles2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-01, Volume: 25, Issue:13
Quinolyl analogues of norlobelane: novel potent inhibitors of [(3)H]dihydrotetrabenazine binding and [(3)H]dopamine uptake at the vesicular monoamine transporter-2.
AID682029TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of MPP+ uptake (MPP+: 1 uM) in OCT3-expressing HRPE cells1998The Journal of biological chemistry, Dec-04, Volume: 273, Issue:49
Identity of the organic cation transporter OCT3 as the extraneuronal monoamine transporter (uptake2) and evidence for the expression of the transporter in the brain.
AID1066369Activation of rat TAAR1 transmembrane domain 6 Met268(6.55)Thr mutant expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as stimulation of cAMP production after 1 hr by chemiluminescent assay2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-23, Volume: 57, Issue:2
Exploring the determinants of trace amine-associated receptor 1's functional selectivity for the stereoisomers of amphetamine and methamphetamine.
AID625286Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625281Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholelithiasis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1323835Displacement of [3H]rosiglitazone from recombinant human C-terminal His-tagged MitoNEET cytosolic domain (32 to 108 residues) expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 by Cheng-Prusoff analysis2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 11-01, Volume: 26, Issue:21
Identification of small molecules that bind to the mitochondrial protein mitoNEET.
AID1066362Activation of mouse TAAR1 transmembrane domain 6 Thr268(6.55)Met mutant expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as stimulation of cAMP production at at 0.0001 to 100 uM after 1 hr by chemiluminescent assay relative to beta-phenylethylamine2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-23, Volume: 57, Issue:2
Exploring the determinants of trace amine-associated receptor 1's functional selectivity for the stereoisomers of amphetamine and methamphetamine.
AID186415Effect on the spontaneous locomotor activity of rats at 0-15 min upon ip administration of the compounds at a dose of 1 mg/kg1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 34, Issue:1
Synthesis, antibacterial activities, and pharmacological properties of enantiomers of temafloxacin hydrochloride.
AID1442398Induction of stimulus generalization in Sprague-Dawley rat trained to discriminate S(+)AMPH assessed as appropriate responding level to training drug by two lever method2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 04-13, Volume: 60, Issue:7
The 2014 Philip S. Portoghese Medicinal Chemistry Lectureship: The "Phenylalkylaminome" with a Focus on Selected Drugs of Abuse.
AID1442399Induction of stimulus generalization in Sprague-Dawley rat trained to discriminate S(-)MCAT assessed as appropriate responding level to training drug by two lever method2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 04-13, Volume: 60, Issue:7
The 2014 Philip S. Portoghese Medicinal Chemistry Lectureship: The "Phenylalkylaminome" with a Focus on Selected Drugs of Abuse.
AID635296Activation of human TAAR1 expressed in human HEK293T cells assessed as cAMP accumulation after 10 mins by BRET assay2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 19, Issue:23
Trace amine-associated receptor 1 is a stereoselective binding site for compounds in the amphetamine class.
AID678715Inhibition of human CYP2D6 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using 4-methylaminoethyl-7-methoxycoumarin as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID778856Inhibition of VMAT2-mediated [3H]-dopamine uptake in rat striata isolated synaptic vesicles by liquid scintillation spectroscopy2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Nov-01, Volume: 21, Issue:21
Synthesis and evaluation of novel azetidine analogs as potent inhibitors of vesicular [3H]dopamine uptake.
AID1066373Activation of rat TAAR1 Asp102(3.32)Ala mutant expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as stimulation of cAMP production at 0.0001 to 100 uM after 1 hr by chemiluminescent assay relative to control2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-23, Volume: 57, Issue:2
Exploring the determinants of trace amine-associated receptor 1's functional selectivity for the stereoisomers of amphetamine and methamphetamine.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (10,326)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19901569 (15.19)18.7374
1990's1102 (10.67)18.2507
2000's2456 (23.78)29.6817
2010's3661 (35.45)24.3611
2020's1538 (14.89)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials409 (3.75%)5.53%
Reviews765 (7.01%)6.00%
Case Studies461 (4.22%)4.05%
Observational35 (0.32%)0.25%
Other9,244 (84.70%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (134)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
The Early Glasses Study: Can Early Glasses Prevent the Development of Amblyopia in Children With High Refractive Errors at Age One [NCT04740593]4,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-10Active, not recruiting
Promoting Cognitive Resilience and Reducing Frailty in Older Veterans With Bright Light Therapy [NCT05631236]35 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-01Not yet recruiting
The Effect of High-speed Power Training on Muscle Performance, Function and Pain in Older Adults With Knee OA [NCT01328340]48 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
WEAR (Wearability and Evaluation of Adjustable Refraction) III: A Randomized Non-inferiority Trial of Children's Wear of Adjustable Glasses [NCT02529540]324 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-01Completed
High Velocity Resistance Training in Older Men and Women [NCT01211496]52 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-30Completed
Randomized Controlled Multicenter Clinical Trial of Multi-Periscopic Prism Glasses for Homonymous Hemianopia [NCT04827147]65 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-03Recruiting
Glasses for Adolescent Delayed Sleep-Wake Phase Disorder (GLAD) [NCT04378933]34 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-27Completed
Effects of Audiovisual Distraction Versus Standard Sedation on Desaturation and Airway Intervention in OSA-patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty Under Neuraxial Anesthesia [NCT03020914]19 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-31Completed
Speed-dependent Treadmill Training is Effective to Improve Gait and Balance Performance in Patients With Sub-acute Stroke [NCT01328301]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
Regenerative Potential of Advanced Platelet Rich Fibrin (A-PRF) and Bioactive Glass (Perioglas®) Bone Graft in the Treatment of Intrabony Defects; A Comparative Clinico Radiographic Study. [NCT04767243]Phase 448 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-01Completed
Acute Effects of Two Different Speed Endurance Protocols on Performance, Muscle Damage Markers and Neuromuscular Fatigue in Soccer Players [NCT03602248]10 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-05-08Completed
Systematic Light Exposure to Treat Cancer-Related Fatigue in Breast Cancer Patients [NCT03217201]194 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-25Completed
Muti-center Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Two Types of Circular Column Modulated Lenses for Delaying the Progression of Myopia [NCT05288335]240 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-05-01Active, not recruiting
Improving Functional Capacity in Heart Failure Patients Supported With Continuous-flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices. -Effects of Increased Pump Speed During Sustained Submaximal Exercise [NCT02335684]31 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-11-30Completed
Drug Effects on EEG [NCT05003076]Early Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-01Recruiting
Identification of Optimum Spectacle Prescriptions for Patients With Down Syndrome [NCT03367793]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-26Completed
Blood Glucose Response After Oral Intake of Lactulose (Laevolac®) in Mildly Constipated Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 [NCT03666546]Phase 424 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-26Completed
Clinical Performance of Bioactive Restorative Material Versus Glass Hybrid Restorative in Posterior Restorations of High Caries Risk Patients: Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT03608306]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-10-31Not yet recruiting
Mapping the Influence of Drugs of Abuse on Risk and Reward Circuits - MDMA [NCT04060108]40 participants (Anticipated)Observational2021-11-02Recruiting
Impact of Speed Of Rewarming After CaRdiac Arrest and ThErapeutic Hypothermia. A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study [NCT02555254]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-12Completed
Clinical Performance of Bioactive Bioceramic Glass Ionomer Restorations vs Conventional High Viscous Glass Ionomer Restorations in Geriatric Patients With Carious Cervical Lesions: A One Year Randomized Clinical Trial. [NCT05624008]28 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-01Recruiting
Effect of Stimulant Drugs on Social Perception [NCT03790618]Phase 140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-06-01Recruiting
Influence of Luting Cement on the Clinical Outcomes of Zirconia Pediatric Crowns. A 3 Year Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03993431]25 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-31Completed
Assessing the Effects of a Commercial Lemonade Beverage and Potassium Citrate on Urinary Stone Risk Factors [NCT05389995]10 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-01Recruiting
Phase 1 Safety-interaction Study of Mirtazapine for the Treatment of Methamphetamine Use Disorder [NCT04614584]Phase 124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-12Recruiting
A Randomized Clinical Trial for the Influence of Injection Rate of Intrathecal Mixture of Local Anesthesia on Hypotension in Cesarean Section [NCT03517683]159 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-15Completed
Survival of Abutment Teeth of Removable Partial Dentures Rehabilitated With Post-retained Restorations: Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT03466437]105 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-02-28Recruiting
Treating Cancer-Related Fatigue Through Systematic Light Exposure [NCT03119363]194 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-01Completed
Potentiating Rural Investment in Children's Eyecare (PRICE) [NCT02231606]10,234 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
A Novel Drug Combination as a Pharmacotherapeutic for Methamphetamine-Use Disorder [NCT04178993]Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-01Completed
Gait Speeds and Demands in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Multi-dimensional Investigation [NCT04436536]Phase 1/Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-02-26Recruiting
Evaluation of Clinical Performance for Recently Introduced Non Coated Glass Ionomer in Occlusal Caries in Posterior Teeth Compared to Conventional Glass Ionomer With Coating: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT04463342]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-03Active, not recruiting
The Use of Repetitive Transmagnetic Stimulation to Target Craving in Methamphetamine Use Disorder [NCT03470480]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-02-07Recruiting
High-Speed Circuit Resistance Training vs. High-Speed Multidirectional Yoga on Changes in Cognition in Healthy Older Adults. [NCT05735353]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-01-17Completed
Minimally Invasive Restorations in Primary Molars Using Encapsulated ou Hand-mixed Glass Ionomer Cement: Clinical Trial With 24 Months of Follow-up [NCT02274142]145 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Completed
Mephedrone and Alcohol Interactions After Single-dose Administration in Humans [NCT02294266]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
Nitrate Supplementation and Exercise Tolerance in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes [NCT02804932]65 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-06-30Recruiting
Objective Adherence With Optical Correction in Children With Bilateral and Unilateral Refractive Amblyopia [NCT03780205]1 participants (Actual)Observational2019-03-20Terminated(stopped due to Unable to recruit sufficient number of subjects)
Effect of Pulp Protection After Selective Carious Tissue Removal in Permanent Teeth, a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT04250142]142 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-03-13Completed
Randomized Double-blind Study on the Effect of Orthoptic Rehabilitation in Pisa Syndrome Associated With Parkinson's Disease [NCT03737773]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Completed
Evaluating the Consequences of Mistimed Light-emitting Device Use on Cardiac Activity and Sleep Health [NCT05342662]34 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-11-23Completed
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Injection Technique for Infant Vaccination [NCT02504398]Phase 3120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-07-31Recruiting
Randomized Trial to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of a Novel Amino-acid Based Hydration Drink in Healthy Volunteers [NCT05592951]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-09-30Completed
Clinical Evaluation of Glass Ionomer With Glass Hybrid Technology Versus Conventional High Viscosity Glass Ionomer in Class I Cavities of High Caries Risk Patients: Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02856932]31 participants (Anticipated)InterventionalNot yet recruiting
Drugs Brain and Behavior [NCT04642820]Early Phase 1160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-01Recruiting
Exercise Tolerance in Patients With Implanted Left Ventricular Assist Device [NCT05063006]22 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-15Completed
Assessment of the Accuracy of the Clinical Parameters and Radiographs in Determining the Topography of Implant Bony Lesions [NCT03698851]24 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-03-02Recruiting
The Effect of Negatively Fluid Balancing Speed for ICU Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome [NCT03552601]70 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-08-01Recruiting
Clinical Evaluation of the Effect of Low Speed Drilling Versus Conventional Drilling Technique on Crestal Bone Level in Maxilla. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT03220815]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-07-31Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Trial Of The SYNC APP [NCT04827446]139 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-07-15Completed
Sleep in Psychiatric Care (SIP): A Transdiagnostic Group-based Sleep-school as Treatment for Comorbid Delayed Sleep-Wake Phase Disorder (DSWPD) [NCT05177055]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-23Recruiting
Sleep in Psychiatric Care: A Transdiagnostic Group-based Sleep-school as Treatment for Comorbid Insomnia [NCT04463498]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-17Recruiting
Multi-speed Ergonomic Wheelchair [NCT05776030]30 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-07-08Not yet recruiting
Performance of Glass-ionomer Cements in the Pit and Fissure Sealing and Atraumatic Restorative Treatment: a Randomized 2-year Clinical Trial [NCT02659917]Phase 1147 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
Implementation of a Stroke Protocol for Emergency Evaluation and Disposition [NCT06094478]900 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-08-02Not yet recruiting
Development of a Family-Based Treatment for Adolescent Methamphetamine Use [NCT00680511]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
Acute and Residual Effects of Beer VS. Caffeinated Beer On Simulated Driving [NCT00515294]Phase 1/Phase 2154 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
Community-based Multi-center Randomized Control Trial of Peripheral Prism Glasses for Hemianopia [NCT00494676]73 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
Effects of Stimulants on Behavioral and Neural Markers of Social Motivation, Ability, and Neural Markers of Social Function [NCT05379959]Early Phase 136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-11Recruiting
Neurobiological Effects of Light on MDD [NCT02940769]7 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-04Terminated(stopped due to Funding no longer available)
Differences in Energy Expenditure of Two Commonly Used Yoga Protocols [NCT02818881]22 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-31Completed
Drug Refractory Partial Epilepsy, A Therapeutic Trial With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation [NCT00001666]32 participants Observational1997-03-31Completed
Effect of Rose-colored Glass on Mood: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT03992586]38 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-30Completed
Comparison of Robot-assisted Gait Training According to Gait Speed in Participants With Stroke [NCT03991364]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-01Not yet recruiting
The Effect Of Watchıng Vıdeo Wıth Vırtual Realıty Glasses On Paın, Anxıety And Satısfactıon Durıng Epızıotomy Repaır [NCT05641467]82 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-06-06Completed
Targeting GABA and Opioid Systems for a Pharmacotherapy for Methamphetamine Abuse [NCT01967381]Early Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
Effect of Virtual Reality (VR) Therapy on Patients Undergoing Hand Surgery Under Ultrasound-guided Regional Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Superiority Trial. [NCT05183412]120 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-01-26Completed
Balanced Solution Versus Saline in Intensive Care Study [NCT02875873]Phase 311,075 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-27Completed
[NCT00829634]12 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Clinical Performance of a Newly Developed Glass Ionomer Restorative Material for Posterior Restorations in an Adolescent Population [NCT02705729]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-03Completed
Feasibility and Safety Properties of Metabolic Flow Anesthesia Driven by Automated Gas Control in Pediatric Patients [NCT05644340]130 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-12-16Completed
Effects of Slow-speed Traditional Resistance Training, High-speed Resistance Training and Multicomponent Training With Variable Resistances on Molecular, Body Composition, Neuromuscular, Physical Function and Quality of Life Variables in Older Adults. [NCT03455179]192 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-05Completed
Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial to Compare Restorative Materials in the Treatment of Root Caries in an Older Irish Population. [NCT01866059]130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-07-31Active, not recruiting
Immunotherapy Combined With Yttrium-90 RadioEmbolization in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer With Liver Metastases [iRE-C - Clinical Trial] [NCT04108481]Phase 1/Phase 218 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-10-05Suspended(stopped due to Working on revisions)
Stroke Inpatient Rehabilitation Reinforcement of Walking Speed [NCT00428480]Phase 1216 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
Clinical Evaluation of Nano Hydroxyapatite Reinforced Glass Ionomer Versus Conventional Glass Ionomer in Treatment of Root Caries in Geriatric Patients: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT04701320]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-07-07Active, not recruiting
Antimicrobial Activity and Clinical Performance of Glass Ionomer Cement Modified With Chlorhexidine and Titanium Dioxide in Primary Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT05645029]Phase 2/Phase 339 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-01Recruiting
Esthetic Patient Satisfaction and Peri-Implant Tissue Success of Crystal Ultra Hybrid Ceramic Compared to E-Max Superstructures in Esthetic Zone [NCT02941575]22 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-12-31Not yet recruiting
Effects of Preoperative Fluid Therapy on Microcirculatory Reactivity in Patients With MIDCAB After General Anesthesia [NCT04982016]126 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-30Not yet recruiting
Clinical Evaluation of the Effect of Low Speed Drilling Versus Conventional Drilling Technique on Crestal Bone Level in Maxilla. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT03212820]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-07-31Active, not recruiting
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Low Dose Corticosteroids vs Anti TNF Treatment in Methotrexate Inadequate Responder Rheumatoid Arthritis Patient- a Pilot Study [NCT01724268]Phase 380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-05-31Recruiting
Nightly Light Exposure in Pregnancy: Blue-blocking Glasses as an Intervention to Ease Sleep Disturbances and to Improve Mood [NCT03114072]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-06-06Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Clinical Trial of the Effectiveness of Base-in Prism Reading Glasses Vs. Placebo Reading Glasses for Symptomatic Convergence Insufficiency in Children [NCT00347581]Phase 372 participants Interventional2003-05-31Completed
Injection Speed of Spinal Anaesthesia for Asian Women Undergoing Lower Segmental Caesarean Section and the Incidence of Hypotension and/or Use of Vasopressors [NCT02275897]77 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
the Antibacterial Effect of Different Glass Ionomer Restoration Containing Zinc ,Silver and Fluoride Ion:in Situ Study [NCT04329858]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-15Not yet recruiting
A Clinical Assessment of Class II Glass Carbomer Cement Restorations Compared to Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Composite Resin Restorations in Primary Molars. [NCT03030690]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-30Completed
Demonstration of a Digital Care Program for Methamphetamine Use Disorder [NCT05206175]100 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-02-14Completed
Addressing Intersectional Stigma Through Coping, Resistance, and Resilience to Improve Methamphetamine Use and Factors Influencing PrEP Uptake Among Latino MSM: a Step Towards Ending HIV by 2030 [NCT05784467]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-06-01Not yet recruiting
[NCT01520766]Phase 491 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-01-31Completed
An Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Impact of Genetic Variation in CYP2D6 on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Methamphetamine in Healthy Adults [NCT01529892]Phase 40 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn
Evaluation of Virtual Reality Glasses Use During Inhaler Treatment in Children [NCT05839054]135 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-11-10Completed
Blood Glucose Response After Oral Intake of Lactulose in Healthy Volunteers [NCT02968498]24 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-30Completed
Behavioral Therapy Development for Methamphetamine Abuse [NCT00252434]Phase 10 participants Interventional2004-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Slow enrollment)
Effects of Genotype on Resting State Connectivity During Methamphetamine Administration [NCT03973489]Phase 469 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-16Completed
Evaluation of Silver Diamine Fluoride Application in Molar-Incisor Hypomineralisation-Affected Molars [NCT06165042]120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-31Not yet recruiting
Esthetic Evaluation of Onlay Restorations Constructed From Two Types of Glass Ceramics:A Randomized Clinical Trial. [NCT05437432]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-03-01Active, not recruiting
Effect of Blue Light Filtration on Visual Performance [NCT01938989]158 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Agents on Color and Roughness of Invisalign Clear Aligners: A Cross-Over Randomized Trial [NCT05213650]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-10-18Completed
Short-term Effects of Methamphetamine Exposure on Residual Viral Transcription During Treated HIV Disease [NCT03825536]Phase 410 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-01Completed
MDMA-Assisted Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) Compared With Methamphetamine-Assisted CBT in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD): A Phase II Study [NCT05783817]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-01Not yet recruiting
Clinical Results of Chronic Cavitary Long-bone Osteomyelitis Treatment Using S53P4 Bioactive Glass; a Multi-center Study [NCT04945434]78 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-01Active, not recruiting
Light Therapy to Treat Cancer-related Fatigue, Sleep Problems, Depression and Cognitive Impairment Among Breast Cancer Patients. [NCT04418856]240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-08Recruiting
To Understand the Effect of Speed Dependent Treadmill Training on Dual Task Performance in Patient With Parkinson's Disease. [NCT05903755]22 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-02Recruiting
Functional Benefit With ACRYSOF® Natural Chromophore [NCT02219997]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Completed
Effects of Parenteral Nutrition in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04425642]120 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-01Completed
Exploring Immunologic Effects of Oral Insulin in Relatives at Risk for Type 1 [NCT02580877]Phase 292 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-31Completed
Error Based Learning for Restoring Gait Symmetry Post-Stroke [NCT01598675]48 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
Field Study of a Digital Therapeutic Platform to Facilitate Treatment for Methamphetamine-Primary Stimulant Use Disorder [NCT05266716]79 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-02-18Completed
Acquisition of Responses to a Methamphetamine-associated Cue in Healthy Humans: Self-report, Behavioral, and Psychophysiological Measures. [NCT02323048]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Completed
Buspirone as a Candidate Medication for Methamphetamine Abuse [NCT01843205]Phase 19 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
A Randomized Control Trial of the Effectiveness of Blue-blocking Glasses for Mania in Inpatients With Bipolar Disorder [NCT05206747]51 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-07Recruiting
Contingency Management for PrEP Adherence and/or Methamphetamine UseDisorder Among MSM and TW in Los Angeles: A Pilot Feasibility Study [NCT04563962]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-15Completed
Pilot Study of the Dose Response of Entacapone on Methamphetamine Induced Interest, Mood Elevation, and Reward [NCT02058966]Early Phase 129 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
Comparison of AmblyzTM Glasses and Patching for Amblyopia [NCT01973348]45 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-30Terminated(stopped due to funding and personnel are lack.)
Assessment of Light Therapy in Insomnia Disorder [NCT05715411]66 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-01Not yet recruiting
The Effect of Virtual Reality on Preoperative Anxiety Before Abdominal Surgery [NCT05718661]96 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-01Active, not recruiting
Using Pharmacogenetics to Better Evaluate Naltrexone for Treating Stimulant Abuse [NCT03226223]Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-15Completed
Clinical Evaluation of the Effect of Low Speed Drilling Versus Conventional Drilling Technique on Crestal Bone Level in Maxilla. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT03220789]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-07-31Active, not recruiting
A Randomised, Controlled Trial of MDMA-assisted Prolonged Exposure Therapy for Comorbid Alcohol Use Disorder and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder [NCT05709353]Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-19Recruiting
Dietary Nitrate Supplementation and Physiological Function in Older Adults [NCT02593305]23 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Completed
Phase 1 Safety-interaction Study of Pomaglumetad Methionil for Methamphetamine Use Disorder [NCT03106571]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-01Terminated(stopped due to Deemed unable to enroll targeted participants in part due to COVID-19 shut downs)
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Dentin Hypersensitivity Treatment Using Glass Ionomer Cements: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT02378129]Phase 2/Phase 320 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-02Completed
Cost-efficacy and Applicability of the Treatment of Moderate Caries Using Sealants as an Alternative to the Restorations on Occlusal Surfaces of Deciduous Teeth: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03005405]96 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-02-28Active, not recruiting
The Effect of Bifocals in Children With Down Syndrome [NCT02241356]120 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Completed
Treating Cognitive Deficits in Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury (SCI): A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT03985540]104 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-11-16Completed
The Effect of Robot-assisted Gait Training on Gait Ability in Children With Cerebral Palsy [NCT04909151]39 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-18Recruiting
Effect of Cervical Margin Relocation With Different Restorative Materials on Three-year Clinical Performance and In-Vitro Fracture Resistance of Indirect Hybrid Ceramic Onlay Restorations [NCT06155773]64 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-08-24Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Tolerance of Crystal Peel (a Salicylic Acid Based Peel) in the Treatment of Acne [NCT05821296]33 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-01-23Completed
The Effect of Exercise Conducted With Virtual Reality Glasses on Pain, Daily Life Activities and Quality of Life In Individuals With Lumbar Disc Herniation [NCT05463588]68 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-08-20Completed
Comparative Evaluation of Porous and Non Porous Variants of Bioactive Glass in the Treatment of Periodontal Intrabony Defects: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Analysis [NCT02463006]Phase 2/Phase 310 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
A Comparison of the Outcomes of Two Existing Routine Clinical Therapies for Dental Prophylaxis [NCT03471325]89 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-08Completed
A Clinical Evaluation of a Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) Based Restorative System [NCT02479711]35 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Active, not recruiting
Single Center Study Evaluating the Possible Effect of Virtual Reality Spectacles on Pain Following Total Knee Replacement Surgery [NCT03311971]Phase 450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-11-30Active, not recruiting
Intermittent Exotropia Study 6: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial of Base-in Prism Spectacles for Intermittent Exotropia [NCT03998670]61 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-01Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00494676 (4) [back to overview]Mobility Change Score (Only Participants Who Discontinued Prism Wear in the Long Term)
NCT00494676 (4) [back to overview]Mobility Change Score (Only Participants Who Continued Prism Wear in the Long Term)
NCT00494676 (4) [back to overview]"Overall Proportion Saying Yes to Real Prism Glasses"
NCT00494676 (4) [back to overview]Mobility Change Score (All Participants Who Completed Crossover)
NCT00515294 (2) [back to overview]Psycho-motor Vigilance Test (PVT)
NCT00515294 (2) [back to overview]Lane Position Deviation
NCT01843205 (27) [back to overview]"Peak Ratings of Willing to Pay For on the Visual Analog Scale"
NCT01843205 (27) [back to overview]"Peak Ratings of Talkative/Friendly on the Visual Analog Scale"
NCT01843205 (27) [back to overview]"Peak Ratings of Sluggish/Fatigued/Lazy on the Visual Analog Scale"
NCT01843205 (27) [back to overview]"Peak Ratings of Shaky/Jittery on the Visual Analog Scale"
NCT01843205 (27) [back to overview]"Peak Ratings of Rush on the Visual Analog Scale"
NCT01843205 (27) [back to overview]"Peak Ratings of Performance Improved on the Visual Analog Scale"
NCT01843205 (27) [back to overview]"Peak Ratings of Performance Impaired on the Visual Analog Scale"
NCT01843205 (27) [back to overview]"Peak Ratings of Restless on the Visual Analog Scale"
NCT01843205 (27) [back to overview]"Peak Ratings of Nervous/Anxious on the Visual Analog Scale"
NCT01843205 (27) [back to overview]"Peak Ratings of Nauseous on the Visual Analog Scale"
NCT01843205 (27) [back to overview]"Peak Ratings of Like Drug on the Visual Analog Scale"
NCT01843205 (27) [back to overview]"Peak Ratings of Irregular/Racing Heartbeat on the Visual Analog Scale"
NCT01843205 (27) [back to overview]"Peak Ratings of High on the Visual Analog Scale"
NCT01843205 (27) [back to overview]"Peak Ratings of Good Effects on the Visual Analog Scale"
NCT01843205 (27) [back to overview]"Peak Ratings of Active, Alert, Energetic on the Visual Analog Scale"
NCT01843205 (27) [back to overview]"Peak Ratings of Bad Effects on the Visual Analog Scale"
NCT01843205 (27) [back to overview]"Peak Ratings of Stimulated on the Visual Analog Scale"
NCT01843205 (27) [back to overview]"Peak Ratings of Any Effect on the Visual Analog Scale"
NCT01843205 (27) [back to overview]Number of Methamphetamine Doses Self-Administered
NCT01843205 (27) [back to overview]Peak Temperature
NCT01843205 (27) [back to overview]Peak Systolic Blood Pressure
NCT01843205 (27) [back to overview]Peak Score on Stimulant Subscale of the Adjective Rating Scale
NCT01843205 (27) [back to overview]Peak Score on Sedative Subscale of the Adjective Rating Scale
NCT01843205 (27) [back to overview]Peak Heart Rate
NCT01843205 (27) [back to overview]Peak Diastolic Blood Pressure
NCT01843205 (27) [back to overview]"Peak Ratings of Euphoric on the Visual Analog Scale"
NCT01843205 (27) [back to overview]"Peak Ratings of Willing to Take Again on the Visual Analog Scale"
NCT01938989 (1) [back to overview]Photostress Recovery Time
NCT01973348 (3) [back to overview]Reverse Amblyopia
NCT01973348 (3) [back to overview]Significant Ocular Deviation Increase From the Baseline
NCT01973348 (3) [back to overview]Visual Acuity Change During 12 Weeks
NCT02058966 (4) [back to overview]Effect of Entacapone on Methamphetamine-induced Stimulation
NCT02058966 (4) [back to overview]Effect of Entacapone on Methamphetamine-induced Mood
NCT02058966 (4) [back to overview]Cognitive Function
NCT02058966 (4) [back to overview]Effect of Entacapone on Subjective Effects of Methamphetamine
NCT02219997 (3) [back to overview]Change in Braking Reaction Time From No-glare to Glare
NCT02219997 (3) [back to overview]Change in Braking Reaction Time From No-glare to Glare (ACRYSOF® IQ IOL + Placebo Filter; Clear IOL + BLF)
NCT02219997 (3) [back to overview]Change in Braking Reaction Time From No-glare to Glare (Clear IOLs)
NCT02323048 (1) [back to overview]"Subjective Effects as Assessed by Score on Feel Drug, Feel High, Like Drug, and Want More Subscales of the Drug Effects Questionnaire"
NCT02580877 (2) [back to overview]Change in mIAA Autoantibody Titer From Baseline
NCT02580877 (2) [back to overview]Change in GAD65 Autoantibody Titer (DK Units/mL)
NCT02593305 (2) [back to overview]Change in Systolic Blood Pressure During Metaboreflex Testing Following 4 Weeks of Dietary Nitrate Supplementation and Placebo in Older Adults.
NCT02593305 (2) [back to overview]Change in Carotid Chemosensitivity Following 4 Weeks of Dietary Nitrate Supplementation and Placebo in Older Adults
NCT03020914 (5) [back to overview]Additional Sedation
NCT03020914 (5) [back to overview]Airway Interventions
NCT03020914 (5) [back to overview]Alertness Levels
NCT03020914 (5) [back to overview]Patient Satisfaction
NCT03020914 (5) [back to overview]Desaturations
NCT03226223 (2) [back to overview]Positive Subjective Effects of Methamphetamine.
NCT03226223 (2) [back to overview]Methamphetamine Self-Administration
NCT03367793 (6) [back to overview]Adapted Visual Acuity
NCT03367793 (6) [back to overview]Initial Visual Acuity
NCT03367793 (6) [back to overview]Spectacle Assessment Survey Question 1
NCT03367793 (6) [back to overview]Spectacle Assessment Survey Question 2
NCT03367793 (6) [back to overview]Spectacle Assessment Survey Question 3
NCT03367793 (6) [back to overview]Spectacle Wear Time
NCT03998670 (27) [back to overview]Parent Assessment of Symptoms and Spectacle Wear - Has Your Child Taken His/Her Spectacles Off When he/She Should be Wearing Them?
NCT03998670 (27) [back to overview]Suppression
NCT03998670 (27) [back to overview]Child Assessment of Symptoms - Do You Have Double Vision?
NCT03998670 (27) [back to overview]Exodeviation by PACT at Distance, Continuous
NCT03998670 (27) [back to overview]Exodeviation by PACT at Near, Continuous
NCT03998670 (27) [back to overview]Exotropia Control Score at Distance and Near, % With No Spontaneous Tropia
NCT03998670 (27) [back to overview]Exotropia Control Score at Distance, % With Treatment Response
NCT03998670 (27) [back to overview]Exotropia Control Score at Distance, Continuous Change Between Baseline and 8 Weeks
NCT03998670 (27) [back to overview]Exotropia Control Score at Distance, Continuous Score
NCT03998670 (27) [back to overview]Exotropia Control Score at Near, Continuous Score
NCT03998670 (27) [back to overview]Fusional Convergence - Continuous Break Point
NCT03998670 (27) [back to overview]Fusional Convergence - Continuous Recovery Point
NCT03998670 (27) [back to overview]Randot Preschool Stereoacuity at Near, Continuous
NCT03998670 (27) [back to overview]Child Assessment of Symptoms - Do You Have Problems With Your Eyes in the Sun?
NCT03998670 (27) [back to overview]Child Assessment of Symptoms - Do Your Eyes Feel Funny?
NCT03998670 (27) [back to overview]Child Assessment of Symptoms - Do Your Eyes go in and Out?
NCT03998670 (27) [back to overview]Child Assessment of Symptoms - Do Your Eyes Hurt?
NCT03998670 (27) [back to overview]Child Assessment of Symptoms - Is it Hard for You to Stare at Things?
NCT03998670 (27) [back to overview]Child Assessment of Symptoms - Is it Hard to Focus Your Eyes?
NCT03998670 (27) [back to overview]Compliance of Spectacle Wear
NCT03998670 (27) [back to overview]Distance Visual Acuity (Snellen Equivalent)
NCT03998670 (27) [back to overview]Parent Assessment of Symptoms and Spectacle Wear - Has Your Child Avoided Reading or Doing Things up Close?
NCT03998670 (27) [back to overview]Parent Assessment of Symptoms and Spectacle Wear - Has Your Child Complained That the Spectacles Hurt His/Her Ears and/or Nose?
NCT03998670 (27) [back to overview]Parent Assessment of Symptoms and Spectacle Wear - Has Your Child Had Eyestrain?
NCT03998670 (27) [back to overview]Parent Assessment of Symptoms and Spectacle Wear - Has Your Child Had Headaches?
NCT03998670 (27) [back to overview]Parent Assessment of Symptoms and Spectacle Wear - Has Your Child Looked Over His or Her Spectacles?
NCT03998670 (27) [back to overview]Parent Assessment of Symptoms and Spectacle Wear - Has Your Child Reported Blurry Vision?
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Delay Discounting for Methamphetamine
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Reinforcing Effects of Methamphetamine Following Methylphenidate (20 mg) Maintenance.
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Heart Rate After Methamphetamine Administration Following Methylphenidate (40 mg) Maintenance.
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Heart Rate After Methamphetamine Administration Following Methylphenidate (20 mg) Maintenance.
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Heart Rate After Methamphetamine Administration Following Methylphenidate (0 mg) Maintenance.
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Diastolic Blood Pressure After Methamphetamine Administration Following Methylphenidate (60 mg) Maintenance.
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Diastolic Blood Pressure After Methamphetamine Administration Following Methylphenidate (40 mg) Maintenance.
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Diastolic Blood Pressure After Methamphetamine Administration Following Methylphenidate (20 mg) Maintenance.
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Diastolic Blood Pressure After Methamphetamine Administration Following Methylphenidate (0 mg) Maintenance.
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Delay Discounting for Money
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Attentional Bias
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Reinforcing Effects of Methamphetamine Following Methylphenidate (0 mg; Placebo) Maintenance.
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Heart Rate After Methamphetamine Administration Following Methylphenidate (60 mg) Maintenance.
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Temperature After Methamphetamine Administration Following Methylphenidate (60 mg) Maintenance.
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Temperature After Methamphetamine Administration Following Methylphenidate (40 mg) Maintenance.
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Temperature After Methamphetamine Administration Following Methylphenidate (0 mg) Maintenance.
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Systolic Blood Pressure After Methamphetamine Administration Following Methylphenidate (60 mg) Maintenance.
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Systolic Blood Pressure After Methamphetamine Administration Following Methylphenidate (40 mg) Maintenance.
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Systolic Blood Pressure After Methamphetamine Administration Following Methylphenidate (20 mg) Maintenance.
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Systolic Blood Pressure After Methamphetamine Administration Following Methylphenidate (0 mg) Maintenance.
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Subjective Effects of Methamphetamine (20 mg) Administration Following Methylphenidate (60 mg) Maintenance.
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Subjective Effects of Methamphetamine (20 mg) Administration Following Methylphenidate (40 mg) Maintenance.
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Subjective Effects of Methamphetamine (20 mg) Administration Following Methylphenidate (20 mg) Maintenance.
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Subjective Effects of Methamphetamine (0 mg) Administration Following Methylphenidate (20 mg) Maintenance.
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Subjective Effects of Methamphetamine (20 mg) Administration Following Methylphenidate (0 mg) Maintenance.
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Subjective Effects of Methamphetamine (10 mg) Administration Following Methylphenidate (60 mg) Maintenance.
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Subjective Effects of Methamphetamine (10 mg) Administration Following Methylphenidate (40 mg) Maintenance.
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Subjective Effects of Methamphetamine (10 mg) Administration Following Methylphenidate (20 mg) Maintenance.
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Subjective Effects of Methamphetamine (10 mg) Administration Following Methylphenidate (0 mg) Maintenance.
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Temperature After Methamphetamine Administration Following Methylphenidate (20 mg) Maintenance.
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Subjective Effects of Methamphetamine (0 mg) Administration Following Methylphenidate (60 mg) Maintenance.
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Subjective Effects of Methamphetamine (0 mg) Administration Following Methylphenidate (40 mg) Maintenance.
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Subjective Effects of Methamphetamine (0 mg) Administration Following Methylphenidate (0 mg) Maintenance.
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Snaith-Hamilton-Pleasure Scale to Measure Anhedonia (Inability to Experience Pleasure)
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Reinforcing Effects of Methamphetamine Following Methylphenidate (60 mg) Maintenance.
NCT04178993 (36) [back to overview]Reinforcing Effects of Methamphetamine Following Methylphenidate (40 mg) Maintenance.
NCT04378933 (4) [back to overview]Change in Non-school Night Sleep Onset Time
NCT04378933 (4) [back to overview]Change in Dim Light Melatonin Onset (DLMO)
NCT04378933 (4) [back to overview]Change in School Night Sleep Onset Time
NCT04378933 (4) [back to overview]Change in Dim Light Melatonin Onset (DLMO) Phase Shift

Mobility Change Score (Only Participants Who Discontinued Prism Wear in the Long Term)

Perceived difficulties with mobility were quantified using a 5-point rating scale (no difficulty to extreme difficulty) for 7 situations (items) relevant to people with hemianopia, including at home, in stores, outdoors, in unfamiliar areas, in familiar areas, in crowded areas, and noticing objects off to the side when walking. The questionnaire was administered at baseline (without prisms) and after each period of the crossover. Interval scale measures of perceived difficulty with overall mobility for each participant were estimated using Rasch analysis of the responses to all seven items (Winsteps software, version 3.70.0.226). Rasch measures were expressed as logits (log odds ratios). Mobility improvement scores for real and sham prisms were defined as the difference in perceived difficulty relative to baseline (in logits). (NCT00494676)
Timeframe: Evaluated after 4 weeks of wearing each type of prism glasses

Interventionlogits (Mean)
Mobility change score for real prismsMobility change score for sham prisms
Entire Study Population Who Discontinued1.11.6

[back to top]

Mobility Change Score (Only Participants Who Continued Prism Wear in the Long Term)

Perceived difficulties with mobility were quantified using a 5-point rating scale (no difficulty to extreme difficulty) for 7 situations (items) relevant to people with hemianopia, including at home, in stores, outdoors, in unfamiliar areas, in familiar areas, in crowded areas, and noticing objects off to the side when walking. The questionnaire was administered at baseline (without prisms) and after each period of the crossover. Interval scale measures of perceived difficulty with overall mobility for each participant were estimated using Rasch analysis of the responses to all seven items (Winsteps software, version 3.70.0.226). Rasch measures were expressed as logits (log odds ratios). Mobility change scores for real and sham prisms were defined as the difference in perceived difficulty relative to baseline (in logits). (NCT00494676)
Timeframe: Evaluated after 4 weeks of wearing each type of prism glasses

Interventionlogits (Mean)
Mobility change score for real prismsMobility change score for sham prisms
Entire Study Population Who Continued3.01.1

[back to top]

"Overall Proportion Saying Yes to Real Prism Glasses"

"At the end of each crossover period, participants were asked a yes/no question: If the study were to end today, would you want to continue with these prism glasses (i.e. the prism glasses worn in that period)? The primary outcome was the overall difference, across the two periods of the crossover, between the proportion of participants saying yes to real prism glasses and the proportion saying yes to sham prism glasses." (NCT00494676)
Timeframe: Evaluated after 4 weeks of wearing each type of prism glasses

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Said yes to real prism glassesSaid yes to sham prism glasses
Entire Study Population3922

[back to top]

Mobility Change Score (All Participants Who Completed Crossover)

Perceived difficulties with mobility were quantified using a 5-point rating scale (no difficulty to extreme difficulty) for 7 situations (items) relevant to people with hemianopia, including at home, in stores, outdoors, in unfamiliar areas, in familiar areas, in crowded areas, and noticing objects off to the side when walking. The questionnaire was administered at baseline (without prisms) and after each period of the crossover. Interval scale measures of perceived difficulty with overall mobility for each participant were estimated using Rasch analysis of the responses to all seven items (Winsteps software, version 3.70.0.226). Rasch measures were expressed as logits (log odds ratios). Mobility change scores for real and sham prisms were defined as the difference in perceived difficulty relative to baseline (in logits). (NCT00494676)
Timeframe: Evaluated after 4 weeks of wearing each type of prism glasses

Interventionlogits (Mean)
Mobility change score for real prismsMobility change score for sham prisms
Entire Study Population1.91.3

[back to top]

Psycho-motor Vigilance Test (PVT)

Participants completed 10 test trials to assess their psycho-motor response using a hand held box that randomly starts a scroll of numbers in milliseconds and as soon as it starts to scroll the participant needs to press a button to stop the scrolling. The mean and standard deviations for the 10 tests were calculated as a single outcome score for each study arm. Response times were measured in milliseconds. The lower the number of milliseconds the faster the response to the random stimuli. (NCT00515294)
Timeframe: 30 minutes post dosing

Interventionmilliseconds (Mean)
1Caffeinated Alcoholic Beer278.7
2Non-Caffeinated Alcoholic Beer293.3
3Caffeinated Non-Alcoholic Beer233.1
4Non-Alcoholic, Non-Caffeinated Beer241.8

[back to top]

Lane Position Deviation

The reported lane position deviation indicates the position of the car relative to the center line in feet in the driver simulator. A deviation of 0 indicates no deviation from the center line (the car is positioned farthest from the road edge). Negative numbers indicate deviations to the right of the center line with the car positioned within the lane closer to the road edge. Positive numbers indicate deviations to the left of the center line with the car positioned in the lane of oncoming traffic closer to the road edge (NCT00515294)
Timeframe: 30 minutes post dosing

Interventionfeet (Mean)
1Caffeinated Alcoholic Beer-1.25
2Non-Caffeinated Alcoholic Beer-1.36
3Caffeinated Non-Alcoholic Beer-1.22
4Non-Alcoholic, Non-Caffeinated Beer-1.21

[back to top]

"Peak Ratings of Willing to Pay For on the Visual Analog Scale"

"Subjects rated their feelings of Willing to Pay For on a Visual Analog Scale. This item was rated from 0 (minimum)-100 (maximum) on a Visual Analog Scale. Higher values represent greater subjective effects on this item. Peak scores were calculated from multiple assessments for each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo conditions." (NCT01843205)
Timeframe: Subjects completed this measure at 15 minute intervals for 2 hours after sampling each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo maintenance conditions.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Methamphetamine10 mg Methamphetamine30 mg Methamphetamine
Buspirone9.3817.7531.63
Placebo1.6319.8834.00

[back to top]

"Peak Ratings of Talkative/Friendly on the Visual Analog Scale"

"Subjects rated their feelings of Talkative/Friendly on a Visual Analog Scale. This item was rated from 0 (minimum)-100 (maximum) on a Visual Analog Scale. Higher values represent greater subjective effects on this item. Peak scores were calculated from multiple assessments for each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo conditions." (NCT01843205)
Timeframe: Subjects completed this measure at 15 minute intervals for 2 hours after sampling each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo maintenance conditions.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Methamphetamine10 mg Methamphetamine30 mg Methamphetamine
Buspirone9.2513.7527.25
Placebo018.5026.00

[back to top]

"Peak Ratings of Sluggish/Fatigued/Lazy on the Visual Analog Scale"

"Subjects rated their feelings of Sluggish/Fatigued/Lazy on a Visual Analog Scale. This item was rated from 0 (minimum)-100 (maximum) on a Visual Analog Scale. Higher values represent greater subjective effects on this item. Peak scores were calculated from multiple assessments for each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo conditions." (NCT01843205)
Timeframe: Subjects completed this measure at 15 minute intervals for 2 hours after sampling each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo maintenance conditions.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Methamphetamine10 mg Methamphetamine30 mg Methamphetamine
Buspirone02.882.25
Placebo1.51.883.13

[back to top]

"Peak Ratings of Shaky/Jittery on the Visual Analog Scale"

"Subjects rated their feelings of Shaky/Jittery on a Visual Analog Scale. This item was rated from 0 (minimum)-100 (maximum) on a Visual Analog Scale. Higher values represent greater subjective effects on this item. Peak scores were calculated from multiple assessments for each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo conditions." (NCT01843205)
Timeframe: Subjects completed this measure at 15 minute intervals for 2 hours after sampling each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo maintenance conditions.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Methamphetamine10 mg Methamphetamine30 mg Methamphetamine
Buspirone8.380.755.50
Placebo0.131.882.88

[back to top]

"Peak Ratings of Rush on the Visual Analog Scale"

"Subjects rated their feelings of Rush on a Visual Analog Scale. This item was rated from 0 (minimum)-100 (maximum) on a Visual Analog Scale. Higher values represent greater subjective effects on this item. Peak scores were calculated from multiple assessments for each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo conditions." (NCT01843205)
Timeframe: Subjects completed this measure at 15 minute intervals for 2 hours after sampling each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo maintenance conditions.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Methamphetamine10 mg Methamphetamine30 mg Methamphetamine
Buspirone10.2516.5026.13
Placebo0.1321.6321.75

[back to top]

"Peak Ratings of Performance Improved on the Visual Analog Scale"

"Subjects rated their feelings of Performance Improved on a Visual Analog Scale. This item was rated from 0 (minimum)-100 (maximum) on a Visual Analog Scale. Higher values represent greater subjective effects on this item. Peak scores were calculated from multiple assessments for each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo conditions." (NCT01843205)
Timeframe: Subjects completed this measure at 15 minute intervals for 2 hours after sampling each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo maintenance conditions.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Methamphetamine10 mg Methamphetamine30 mg Methamphetamine
Buspirone9.2513.3822.75
Placebo01519.13

[back to top]

"Peak Ratings of Performance Impaired on the Visual Analog Scale"

"Subjects rated their feelings of Performance Impaired on a Visual Analog Scale. This item was rated from 0 (minimum)-100 (maximum) on a Visual Analog Scale. Higher values represent greater subjective effects on this item. Peak scores were calculated from multiple assessments for each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo conditions." (NCT01843205)
Timeframe: Subjects completed this measure at 15 minute intervals for 2 hours after sampling each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo maintenance conditions.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Methamphetamine10 mg Methamphetamine30 mg Methamphetamine
Buspirone001.38
Placebo0.252.130

[back to top]

"Peak Ratings of Restless on the Visual Analog Scale"

"Subjects rated their feelings of Restless on a Visual Analog Scale. This item was rated from 0 (minimum)-100 (maximum) on a Visual Analog Scale. Higher values represent greater subjective effects on this item. Peak scores were calculated from multiple assessments for each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo conditions." (NCT01843205)
Timeframe: Subjects completed this measure at 15 minute intervals for 2 hours after sampling each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo maintenance conditions.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Methamphetamine10 mg Methamphetamine30 mg Methamphetamine
Buspirone00.501.13
Placebo53.130.25

[back to top]

"Peak Ratings of Nervous/Anxious on the Visual Analog Scale"

"Subjects rated their feelings of Nervous/Anxious on a Visual Analog Scale. This item was rated from 0 (minimum)-100 (maximum) on a Visual Analog Scale. Higher values represent greater subjective effects on this item. Peak scores were calculated from multiple assessments for each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo conditions." (NCT01843205)
Timeframe: Subjects completed this measure at 15 minute intervals for 2 hours after sampling each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo maintenance conditions.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Methamphetamine10 mg Methamphetamine30 mg Methamphetamine
Buspirone013.75
Placebo0.882.384

[back to top]

"Peak Ratings of Nauseous on the Visual Analog Scale"

"Subjects rated their feelings of Nauseous on a Visual Analog Scale. This item was rated from 0 (minimum)-100 (maximum) on a Visual Analog Scale. Higher values represent greater subjective effects on this item. Peak scores were calculated from multiple assessments for each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo conditions." (NCT01843205)
Timeframe: Subjects completed this measure at 15 minute intervals for 2 hours after sampling each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo maintenance conditions.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Methamphetamine10 mg Methamphetamine30 mg Methamphetamine
Buspirone02.385
Placebo06.383.50

[back to top]

"Peak Ratings of Like Drug on the Visual Analog Scale"

"Subjects rated their feelings of Like Drug on a Visual Analog Scale. This item was rated from 0 (minimum)-100 (maximum) on a Visual Analog Scale. Higher values represent greater subjective effects on this item. Peak scores were calculated from multiple assessments for each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo conditions." (NCT01843205)
Timeframe: Subjects completed this measure at 15 minute intervals for 2 hours after sampling each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo maintenance conditions.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Methamphetamine10 mg Methamphetamine30 mg Methamphetamine
Buspirone9.6318.5030.50
Placebo0.6322.6332.75

[back to top]

"Peak Ratings of Irregular/Racing Heartbeat on the Visual Analog Scale"

"Subjects rated their feelings of Irregular/Racing Heartbeat on a Visual Analog Scale. This item was rated from 0 (minimum)-100 (maximum) on a Visual Analog Scale. Higher values represent greater subjective effects on this item. Peak scores were calculated from multiple assessments for each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo conditions." (NCT01843205)
Timeframe: Subjects completed this measure at 15 minute intervals for 2 hours after sampling each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo maintenance conditions.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Methamphetamine10 mg Methamphetamine30 mg Methamphetamine
Buspirone8.510.7516.13
Placebo0.7510.6314.38

[back to top]

"Peak Ratings of High on the Visual Analog Scale"

"Subjects rated their feelings of High on a Visual Analog Scale. This item was rated from 0 (minimum)-100 (maximum) on a Visual Analog Scale. Higher values represent greater subjective effects on this item. Peak scores were calculated from multiple assessments for each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo conditions." (NCT01843205)
Timeframe: Subjects completed this measure at 15 minute intervals for 2 hours after sampling each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo maintenance conditions.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Methamphetamine10 mg Methamphetamine30 mg Methamphetamine
Buspirone10.516.531
Placebo0.6322.1328.63

[back to top]

"Peak Ratings of Good Effects on the Visual Analog Scale"

"Subjects rated their feelings of Good Effects on a Visual Analog Scale. This item was rated from 0 (minimum)-100 (maximum) on a Visual Analog Scale. Higher values represent greater subjective effects on this item. Peak scores were calculated from multiple assessments for each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo conditions." (NCT01843205)
Timeframe: Subjects completed this measure at 15 minute intervals for 2 hours after sampling each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo maintenance conditions.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Methamphetamine10 mg Methamphetamine30 mg Methamphetamine
Buspirone9.6317.3831.5
Placebo0.882130.63

[back to top]

"Peak Ratings of Active, Alert, Energetic on the Visual Analog Scale"

"Subjects rated their feelings of Active, Alert, Energetic on a Visual Analog Scale. This item was rated from 0 (minimum)-100 (maximum) on a Visual Analog Scale. Higher values represent greater subjective effects on this item. Peak scores were calculated from multiple assessments for each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo conditions." (NCT01843205)
Timeframe: Subjects completed this measure at 15 minute intervals for 2 hours after sampling each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo maintenance conditions.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Methamphetamine10 mg Methamphetamine30 mg Methamphetamine
Buspirone8.7514.529.25
Placebo2.131935

[back to top]

"Peak Ratings of Bad Effects on the Visual Analog Scale"

"Subjects rated their feelings of Bad Effects on a Visual Analog Scale. This item was rated from 0 (minimum)-100 (maximum) on a Visual Analog Scale. Higher values represent greater subjective effects on this item. Peak scores were calculated from multiple assessments for each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo conditions." (NCT01843205)
Timeframe: Subjects completed this measure at 15 minute intervals for 2 hours after sampling each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo maintenance conditions.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Methamphetamine10 mg Methamphetamine30 mg Methamphetamine
Buspirone1.57.638.38
Placebo0.1373.13

[back to top]

"Peak Ratings of Stimulated on the Visual Analog Scale"

"Subjects rated their feelings of Stimulated on a Visual Analog Scale. This item was rated from 0 (minimum)-100 (maximum) on a Visual Analog Scale. Higher values represent greater subjective effects on this item. Peak scores were calculated from multiple assessments for each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo conditions." (NCT01843205)
Timeframe: Subjects completed this measure at 15 minute intervals for 2 hours after sampling each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo maintenance conditions.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Methamphetamine10 mg Methamphetamine30 mg Methamphetamine
Buspirone9.8817.8824.25
Placebo1.2521.8821.50

[back to top]

"Peak Ratings of Any Effect on the Visual Analog Scale"

"Subjects rated their feelings of Any Effect on a Visual Analog Scale. This item was rated from 0 (minimum)-100 (maximum) on a Visual Analog Scale. Higher values represent greater subjective effects on this item. Peak scores were calculated from multiple assessments for each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo conditions." (NCT01843205)
Timeframe: Subjects completed this measure at 15 minute intervals for 2 hours after sampling each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo maintenance conditions.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Methamphetamine10 mg Methamphetamine30 mg Methamphetamine
Buspirone1021.533
Placebo0.7525.7534.38

[back to top]

Number of Methamphetamine Doses Self-Administered

The reinforcing effects of methamphetamine will be determined during placebo and buspirone treatment using a modified progressive ratio procedure in which subjects are offered the opportunity to earn previously sampled doses of methamphetamine. Each ratio completed on the task will earn 1/10th of the sampled dose. (NCT01843205)
Timeframe: One test per methamphetamine dose level per intervention for each participant over his/her approximate 25 day inpatient admission

,
InterventionNumber of Methamphetamine Doses (Mean)
Placebo Methamphetamine10 mg Methamphetamine30 mg Methamphetamine
Buspirone047.5
Placebo1.256.137.88

[back to top]

Peak Temperature

Oral temperature was measured with an automated monitor. Higher values represent greater temperature. Peak scores were calculated from multiple assessments for each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo conditions. (NCT01843205)
Timeframe: Subjects completed this measure at 15 minute intervals for 2 hours after sampling each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo maintenance conditions.

,
Interventiondegrees Fahrenheit (Mean)
Placebo Methamphetamine10 mg Methamphetamine30 mg Methamphetamine
Buspirone98.4198.4698.43
Placebo98.4898.4498.33

[back to top]

Peak Systolic Blood Pressure

Systolic blood pressure was measured with an automated monitor. Higher values represent greater systolic pressure. Peak scores were calculated from multiple assessments for each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo conditions. (NCT01843205)
Timeframe: Subjects completed this measure at 15 minute intervals for 2 hours after sampling each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo maintenance conditions.

,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Placebo Methamphetamine10 mg Methamphetamine30 mg Methamphetamine
Buspirone125.00131.63137.13
Placebo125.38131.25139.63

[back to top]

Peak Score on Stimulant Subscale of the Adjective Rating Scale

"Subjects completed 16 items that loaded into the Stimulant Subscale of the Adjective Rating Scale. The items were rated 0-4 on a Likert-type scale and the sum for the 16 stimulant items was summed to yield the Stimulant Subscale score. The maximum score for this scale was 64, the minimum was 0. Higher values represent greater subjective effects on this item. Peak scores were calculated from multiple assessments for each methamphetamine dose under both bupsirone and placebo conditions." (NCT01843205)
Timeframe: Subjects completed this measure at 15 minute intervals for 2 hours after sampling each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo maintenance conditions.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Methamphetamine10 mg Methamphetamine30 mg Methamphetamine
Buspirone7.259.2513
Placebo5.639.8811.38

[back to top]

Peak Score on Sedative Subscale of the Adjective Rating Scale

"Subjects completed 16 items that loaded into the Sedative Subscale of the Adjective Rating Scale. The items were rated 0-4 on a Likert-type scale and the sum for the 16 sedative items was summed to yield the Sedative Subscale score. The maximum score for this scale was 64, the minimum was 0. Higher values represent greater subjective effects on this item. Peak scores were calculated from multiple assessments for each methamphetamine dose under both bupsirone and placebo conditions." (NCT01843205)
Timeframe: Subjects completed this measure at 15 minute intervals for 2 hours after sampling each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo maintenance conditions.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Methamphetamine10 mg Methamphetamine30 mg Methamphetamine
Buspirone2.753.753.25
Placebo3.383.633

[back to top]

Peak Heart Rate

Heart rate was measured with an automated monitor. Higher values represent greater heart rate. Peak scores were calculated from multiple assessments for each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo conditions. (NCT01843205)
Timeframe: Subjects completed this measure at 15 minute intervals for 2 hours after sampling each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo maintenance conditions.

,
Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
Placebo Methamphetamine10 mg Methamphetamine30 mg Methamphetamine
Buspirone81.2585.1390.63
Placebo82.7586.1385.38

[back to top]

Peak Diastolic Blood Pressure

Diastolic blood pressure was measured with an automated monitor. Higher values represent greater diastolic pressure. Peak scores were calculated from multiple assessments for each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo conditions. (NCT01843205)
Timeframe: Subjects completed this measure at 15 minute intervals for 2 hours after sampling each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo maintenance conditions.

,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Placebo Methamphetamine10 mg Methamphetamine30 mg Methamphetamine
Buspirone80.1383.0084.50
Placebo77.5080.7583.80

[back to top]

"Peak Ratings of Euphoric on the Visual Analog Scale"

"Subjects rated their feelings of Euphoric on a Visual Analog Scale. This item was rated from 0 (minimum)-100 (maximum) on a Visual Analog Scale. Higher values represent greater subjective effects on this item. Peak scores were calculated from multiple assessments for each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo conditions." (NCT01843205)
Timeframe: Subjects completed this measure at 15 minute intervals for 2 hours after sampling each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo maintenance conditions.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Methamphetamine10 mg Methamphetamine30 mg Methamphetamine
Buspirone03.888.5
Placebo0.634.887.63

[back to top]

"Peak Ratings of Willing to Take Again on the Visual Analog Scale"

"Subjects rated their feelings of Willing to Take Again on a Visual Analog Scale. This item was rated from 0 (minimum)-100 (maximum) on a Visual Analog Scale. Higher values represent greater subjective effects on this item. Peak scores were calculated from multiple assessments for each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo conditions." (NCT01843205)
Timeframe: Subjects completed this measure at 15 minute intervals for 2 hours after sampling each methamphetamine dose under both buspirone and placebo maintenance conditions.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Methamphetamine10 mg Methamphetamine30 mg Methamphetamine
Buspirone9.6220.6333.00
Placebo1.2522.0035.00

[back to top]

Photostress Recovery Time

Photostress Recovery Time is the time necessary to recover function (e.g., contrast discrimination) following exposure to a bright glare source. The subject fixated on an image (black and white grating) and underwent photostress (glare) for 5 seconds. Only 1 eye (study eye) was assessed. (NCT01938989)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionseconds (Mean)
Blue Light Filter5.66
Clear6.94

[back to top]

Reverse Amblyopia

it is defined that the strong eye of the patient decreases two logMAR lines over 3 months. (NCT01973348)
Timeframe: 3 Months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
4-hour AmblyZ Glasses0
2-hour Eye Patching0
12-hour AmblyZ Glasses0
6-hour Eye Patching0

[back to top]

Significant Ocular Deviation Increase From the Baseline

The significant ocular deviation is defined as equal or over 10 degrees of deviation more than that of the baseline. (NCT01973348)
Timeframe: 3 Months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
4-hour AmblyZ Glasses0
2-hour Eye Patching0
12-hour AmblyZ Glasses0
6-hour Eye Patching0

[back to top]

Visual Acuity Change During 12 Weeks

Visual acuity change during 12 weeks: the difference of visual acuity at baseline and 12 weeks. (NCT01973348)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionlogMAR (Mean)
4-hour AmblyZ Glasses.15
2-hour Eye Patching.15

[back to top]

Effect of Entacapone on Methamphetamine-induced Stimulation

"The Global Rating of Stimulation is a 1-item question I feel light-headed, restless, or speeded-up in which the participant is asked to circle one answer on a scale from 0-4, 0 is 'normal', 1 is 'slightly', 2 is 'moderately', 3 is 'very much', and 4 is 'extremely'. Whichever number they circled is their reported score. A higher score is indicative of a greater stimulating effect." (NCT02058966)
Timeframe: Measurements acquired before drug ingestion (baseline) then hourly for 4 hours. The peak interaction effect of entacapone and methamphetamine occurs 1 hour after ingestion, therefore the reported values are from this timepoint.

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline0.1667
Placebo Followed by Placebo0.1667
Placebo Followed by Methamphetamine1.4167
Entacapone Followed by Placebo0.4167
Entacapone Followed by Methamphetamine1.3333

[back to top]

Effect of Entacapone on Methamphetamine-induced Mood

Profile of Mood States is a 65 item questionnaire using a Likert rating scale to assess transient, distinct moods. The questionnaire contains 65 words/statements that describe feelings people have. The test requires you to indicate for each word or statement how you have been feeling in the past week including today. A Total Mood Disturbance score is calculated by adding scores for Tension, Depression, Anger, Fatigue and Confusion and then subtracting the Vigour score. The Total Mood Disturbance scale ranges from -32 to 200 with lower scores indicative of people with more stable mood profiles. (NCT02058966)
Timeframe: Measurements acquired before drug ingestion (baseline) then hourly for 4 hours. The peak interaction effect of entacapone and methamphetamine occurs 1 hour after ingestion, therefore the reported values are from this timepoint.

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline12.500
Placebo Followed by Placebo13.750
Placebo Followed by Methamphetamine7.500
Entacapone Followed by Placebo9.833
Entacapone Followed by Methamphetamine8.750

[back to top]

Cognitive Function

Two computer tests were administered to measure how each medication intervention effects cognitive functioning. The tests administered included the Rapid Visual Information Processing Task (RVIPT), a 6 minute test of sustained attention in which participants are requested to detect target sequences of digits and the Digit Symbol Substitution Task (DSST), a 2 minute test of psychomotor speed and sustained attention consisting of digit-symbol pairs followed by a list of digits where the subject identifies the symbol that corresponds to each digit as fast as possible. The number of correct responses within the allowed time is measured. Higher scores on both tasks indicate better performance. (NCT02058966)
Timeframe: Measurements acquired before drug ingestion (baseline) then hourly for 4 hours. The peak interaction effect of entacapone and methamphetamine occurs 1 hour after ingestion, therefore the reported values are from this timepoint.

,,,,
Interventionnumber of correct answers (Mean)
Rapid Visual Information Processing TaskDigital Symbol Substitution Task
Baseline38.81373.167
Entacapone Followed by Methamphetamine40.08372.750
Entacapone Followed by Placebo42.58372.750
Placebo Followed by Methamphetamine41.33371.167
Placebo Followed by Placebo40.50072.000

[back to top]

Effect of Entacapone on Subjective Effects of Methamphetamine

The subjective effects of the study drug were evaluated with the Addiction Research Center Inventory (ARCI-49), a 49 item questionnaire consisting of true/false items. True items receive a score of 1 if answer is 'True', false items receive a score of 1 if answer is 'False'. No points are given when answer is opposite to scoring direction. There are 5 subscales: Morphine Benzedrine group scale to measure euphoria (range: 0-16 with higher numbers indicating more euphoria), A Lysergic Acid Diethylamide group scale to estimate dysphoria and agitation (range: 0-14 with higher scores indicating more dysphoria), a Pentobarbital Chlorpromazine Alcohol group scale to measure sedation (range: 0-15 with higher scores indicating more sedation), and a Benzedrine group scale and an Amphetamine Scale to assess stimulant effects (range: 0-13 and 0-11, respectively, with higher scores indicating higher stimulant effects) . (NCT02058966)
Timeframe: Measurements acquired before drug ingestion (baseline) then hourly for 4 hours. The peak interaction effect of entacapone and methamphetamine occurs 1 hour after ingestion, therefore the reported values are from this timepoint.

,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Morphine BenzedrineLysergic Acid DiethylamidePentobarbital Chlorpromazine AlcoholBenzedrineAmphetamine
Baseline1.93753.06254.81254.95832.0000
Entacapone Followed by Methamphetamine6.91673.83332.00007.83335.5833
Entacapone Followed by Placebo2.58333.254.08335.33332.5833
Placebo Followed by Methamphetamine7.91674.751.58338.66675.9167
Placebo Followed by Placebo1.83333.255.00005.16672.1667

[back to top]

Change in Braking Reaction Time From No-glare to Glare

Braking reaction time (time to brake, in seconds) was assessed using a driving simulator in no-glare and glare conditions. The subject was presented with a driving scenario during which an obstruction (car pulling over from either side of the road in a random fashion) was presented. Subjects braked in an attempt to avoid colliding with the obstruction, and the braking reaction time was recorded. The experiment was repeated with a glare source present. Both assessments (no-glare and glare) occurred on the same day. Change in braking reaction time was calculated as glare minus no-glare. (NCT02219997)
Timeframe: Visit 2, up to Day 30

Interventionseconds (Mean)
AcrySof IQ IOL0.07
Clear IOL0.15

[back to top]

Change in Braking Reaction Time From No-glare to Glare (ACRYSOF® IQ IOL + Placebo Filter; Clear IOL + BLF)

Braking reaction time (time to brake, in seconds) was assessed using a driving simulator in no-glare and glare conditions. The subject was presented with a driving scenario during which an obstruction (car pulling over from either side of the road in a random fashion) was presented. Subjects braked in an attempt to avoid colliding with the obstruction, and the braking reaction time was recorded. The experiment was repeated with a glare source present. Both assessments (no-glare and glare) occurred on the same day. Change in braking reaction time was calculated as glare minus no-glare. (NCT02219997)
Timeframe: Visit 2, Up to Day 30

Interventionseconds (Mean)
ACRYSOF IQ IOL + Placebo Filter0.12
Clear IOL + BLF0.16

[back to top]

Change in Braking Reaction Time From No-glare to Glare (Clear IOLs)

Braking reaction time (time to brake, in seconds) was assessed using a driving simulator in no-glare and glare conditions. The subject was presented with a driving scenario during which an obstruction (car pulling over from either side of the road in a random fashion) was presented. Subjects braked in an attempt to avoid colliding with the obstruction, and the braking reaction time was recorded. The experiment was repeated with a glare source present. Both assessments (no-glare and glare) occurred on the same day. Change in braking reaction time was calculated as glare minus no-glare. This outcome measure was pre-specified for Clear IOL only. (NCT02219997)
Timeframe: Visit 2, Up to Day 30

Interventionseconds (Mean)
Placebo Filter0.17
Blue Light Filter0.16

[back to top]

"Subjective Effects as Assessed by Score on Feel Drug, Feel High, Like Drug, and Want More Subscales of the Drug Effects Questionnaire"

"The Drug Effects Questionnaire (DEQ) is a visual analog scale questionnaire that assesses the extent to which subjects experience four subjective states: Feel Drug, Feel High, Like Drug, and Want More. The Feel Drug, Feel High, Like Drug, and Want More subscales are reported. All subscales are scored on a visual analogue scale (scroll bar on computer screen) ranging from 0-100. 100 represents the highest score for that subjective state, and the higher the score, the worse the outcome." (NCT02323048)
Timeframe: End of study (time 0 and approximately 4 weeks later)

,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Feel DrugLike DrugFeel HighWant More
Paired no Reward (Methamphetamine Sessions)41.2260.5538.8861.55
Paired, High Reward (Methamphetamine Sessions)50.3968.8542.0465.11
Paired, Low Reward (Methamphetamine Sessions)45.2564.2541.0462.44
Unpaired, High Reward (Methamphetamine Sessions)48.5561.5539.5560.55
Unpaired, Low Reward (Methamphetamine Sessions)42.2260.238.059.5

[back to top]

Change in mIAA Autoantibody Titer From Baseline

Micro-islet autoantibodies (mIAA) autoantibody titers are a measure of of beta cell immune response (NCT02580877)
Timeframe: 13 and 26 weeks after first dose versus baseline

,
InterventionDK Units/mL (Mean)
13 weeks26 weeks
500mg Oral Insulin Crystals Every Other Week0.0200.017
67.5 mg Oral Insulin Crystals Daily0.0210.020

[back to top]

Change in GAD65 Autoantibody Titer (DK Units/mL)

Change in T-lymphocyte (GAD65) biomarker of beta cell specific immune response (NCT02580877)
Timeframe: 13 and 26 weeks after first dose versus baseline

,
InterventionDK Units/mL (Mean)
13 weeks26 weeks
500 mg Oral Insulin Crystals Every Other Week234196
67.5 mg Oral Insulin Crystals Daily247193

[back to top]

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure During Metaboreflex Testing Following 4 Weeks of Dietary Nitrate Supplementation and Placebo in Older Adults.

Muscle metaboreflex examined by measuring systolic blood pressure responses to ischemic isometric muscle contraction in older adults before and after 4 weeks of beet root juice supplementation and placebo. (NCT02593305)
Timeframe: Pre and post 4 weeks dietary nitrate supplementation and pre and post 4 weeks of placebo.

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Nitrate Pre19.2
Nitrate Post13
Placebo Pre16.1
Placebo Post17

[back to top]

Change in Carotid Chemosensitivity Following 4 Weeks of Dietary Nitrate Supplementation and Placebo in Older Adults

Carotid chemosensitivity examined by measuring hypoxia ventilatory responsiveness in older adults before and after 4 weeks of beet root juice supplementation and placebo. Chemoreflex sensitivity was quantified as the change in ventilation in relation to the change in pulse oxygen saturation. (NCT02593305)
Timeframe: Pre and post 4 weeks dietary nitrate supplementation and pre and post 4 weeks of placebo.

InterventionL/min/%SpO2 (Mean)
Nitrate Pre-0.13
Nitrate Post-0.05
Placebo Pre-0.10
Placebo Post-0.11

[back to top]

Additional Sedation

Patient request for additional sedation (NCT03020914)
Timeframe: intraoperative

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Audiovisual Distraction2
Standard of Care Sedation1

[back to top]

Airway Interventions

each airway intervention (defined as one of the following: jaw thrust, oropharyngeal airway, nasopharyngeal airway, mask ventilation, larynx mask or intubation) that is implemented during this time frame will be observed and documented by research staff, if it occurs. (NCT03020914)
Timeframe: start of anesthesia until 30 minutes after recovery room admission (ca. 3 hours)

Interventionairway interventions (Number)
Audiovisual Distraction2
Standard of Care Sedation7

[back to top]

Alertness Levels

Alertness levels measured using the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (MOAA/S), which rates alertness on a scale of 0-5, with higher ratings representing increased alertness (e.g. '5 - Responds readily to name spoken in normal tone'). Results reflect a median score of ratings collected at 4 time points. (NCT03020914)
Timeframe: 4 times: preoperative, intraoperative, at time of recovery room admission, 10 minutes before recovery room discharge

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Audiovisual Distraction0
Standard of Care Sedation0

[back to top]

Patient Satisfaction

Patient satisfaction at recovery room discharge as measured by the Heidelberg perianesthetic questionnaire, which assesses patients' peri-anaesthetic satisfaction on a four-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (unimportant to me) to 3 (very important to me). Scores for each question are summed for a final score, with higher total score signifying higher satisfaction and lower total score signifying lower satisfaction. The score scale has a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 114 (based off 3 as the highest response score for 38 individual questions). (NCT03020914)
Timeframe: 10 minutes before recovery room discharge

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Audiovisual Distraction55
Standard of Care Sedation54

[back to top]

Desaturations

number of desaturation events (SpO2< 90% for ≥ 10 sec) measured during this time frame (NCT03020914)
Timeframe: start of anesthesia until 30 minutes after recovery room admission (ca. 3 hours)

Interventionnumber of desaturation events (Median)
Audiovisual Distraction0
Standard of Care Sedation1

[back to top]

Positive Subjective Effects of Methamphetamine.

"Participant ratings of methamphetamine Liking, on a 100 mm visual analog scale. Participants are asked to indicate on a 100 mm line the extent to which they agree with the description of the drug provided. The 0 mm end of the line indicates Not at All, while the 100 mm indicates Extremely." (NCT03226223)
Timeframe: 1 day

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Naltrexone 0 mg53.6
Naltrexone 50 mg57.2

[back to top]

Methamphetamine Self-Administration

To assess the reinforcing effects of methamphetamine, participants complete a drug self-administration procedure. The outcome measure for this procedure is the number of operant responses (clicks on a mouse) participant are willing to make in order to receive drug (methamphetamine). (NCT03226223)
Timeframe: 1 day.

InterventionClicks on a computer mouse (Mean)
Naltrexone 0 mg8890
Naltrexone 50 mg7116

[back to top]

Adapted Visual Acuity

Aided LogMAR distance visual acuity obtained with either the British Standard Letters or HOTV - matching for subjects unable to name letters. (NCT03367793)
Timeframe: two months

,,,,,
InterventionlogMAR (Mean)
Period 2 Treatment 1 Dispense to 2 Months WearPeriod 3 Treatment 2 Dispense to 2 Months WearPeriod 4 Treatment 3 Dispense to 2 Months Wear
Clinical, Then Metric #1, Then Metric #20.2560.2720.288
Clinical, Then Metric #2, Then Metric #10.4400.4120.424
Metric #1, Then Clinical, Then Metric #20.3560.3700.320
Metric #1, Then Metric #2, Then Clinical0.3000.2560.216
Metric #2, Then Clinical, Then Metric #10.2840.3160.276
Metric #2, Then Metric #1, Then Clinical0.3640.3160.372

[back to top]

Initial Visual Acuity

Aided LogMAR distance visual acuity obtained with either the British Standard Letters or HOTV - matching for subjects unable to name letters. (NCT03367793)
Timeframe: 1 day

,,,,,
InterventionlogMAR (Mean)
Treatment 1 Initial DispenseTreatment 2 Initial DispenseTreatment 3 Initial Dispense
Clinical, Then Metric #1, Then Metric #20.280.250.31
Clinical, Then Metric #2, Then Metric #10.430.430.44
Metric #1, Then Clinical, Then Metric #20.340.360.40
Metric #1, Then Metric #2, Then Clinical0.290.300.28
Metric #2, Then Clinical, Then Metric #10.280.300.32
Metric #2, Then Metric #1, Then Clinical0.330.340.40

[back to top]

Spectacle Assessment Survey Question 1

Participants were asked to select a face from a survey with five expressions (large frown, small frown, neutral, small smile, large smile) depicting their response to the question 'Do you like wearing this pair of glasses?' Responses were coded 1 through 5 with 5 = large smile. (NCT03367793)
Timeframe: two months

,,,,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Period 2 Treatment 1 Dispense to 2 Months WearPeriod 3 Treatment 2 Dispense to 2 Months WearPeriod 4 Treatment 3 Dispense to 2 Months Wear
Clinical, Then Metric #1, Then Metric #2555
Clinical, Then Metric #2, Then Metric #1555
Metric #1, Then Clinical, Then Metric #2555
Metric #1, Then Metric #2, Then Clinical555
Metric #2, Then Clinical, Then Metric #1555
Metric #2, Then Metric #1, Then Clinical544

[back to top]

Spectacle Assessment Survey Question 2

Participants were asked to select a face from a survey with five expressions (large frown, small frown, neutral, small smile, large smile) depicting their response to the question 'How well do you see with this pair of glasses when looking far away?' Responses were coded 1 through 5 with 5 = large smile. (NCT03367793)
Timeframe: two months

,,,,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Period 2 Treatment 1 Dispense to 2 Months WearPeriod 3 Treatment 2 Dispense to 2 Months WearPeriod 4 Treatment 3 Dispense to 2 Months Wear
Clinical, Then Metric #1, Then Metric #2555
Clinical, Then Metric #2, Then Metric #1555
Metric #1, Then Clinical, Then Metric #254.55
Metric #1, Then Metric #2, Then Clinical555
Metric #2, Then Clinical, Then Metric #1555
Metric #2, Then Metric #1, Then Clinical545

[back to top]

Spectacle Assessment Survey Question 3

Participants were asked to select a face from a survey with five expressions (large frown, small frown, neutral, small smile, large smile) depicting their response to the question 'How well do you see with this pair of glasses when looking up close?' Responses were coded 1 through 5 with 5 = large smile. (NCT03367793)
Timeframe: two months

,,,,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Period 2 Treatment 1 Dispense to 2 Months WearPeriod 3 Treatment 2 Dispense to 2 Months WearPeriod 4 Treatment 3 Dispense to 2 Months Wear
Clinical, Then Metric #1, Then Metric #2555
Clinical, Then Metric #2, Then Metric #1555
Metric #1, Then Clinical, Then Metric #2555
Metric #1, Then Metric #2, Then Clinical555
Metric #2, Then Clinical, Then Metric #1555
Metric #2, Then Metric #1, Then Clinical555

[back to top]

Spectacle Wear Time

Total wear time of each pair of spectacles as measured objectively by a temperature sensor data logger mounted to the spectacle temple. (NCT03367793)
Timeframe: two months

,,,,,
InterventionHours (Mean)
Period 2 Treatment 1 Dispense to 2 Months WearPeriod 3 Treatment 2 Dispense to 2 Months WearPeriod 4 Treatment 3 Dispense to 2 Months Wear
Clinical, Then Metric #1, Then Metric #211.939.5011.61
Clinical, Then Metric #2, Then Metric #113.1512.6813.32
Metric #1, Then Clinical, Then Metric #210.4812.3111.95
Metric #1, Then Metric #2, Then Clinical8.409.269.54
Metric #2, Then Clinical, Then Metric #19.819.679.47
Metric #2, Then Metric #1, Then Clinical11.6211.2511.31

[back to top]

Parent Assessment of Symptoms and Spectacle Wear - Has Your Child Taken His/Her Spectacles Off When he/She Should be Wearing Them?

"Adverse symptoms of intermittent exotropia and spectacle wear will be summarized at the 8-week outcome exam using a symptom survey that is administered to the parent.~Response options are based on frequency of observations: never, almost never, sometimes, often, and almost always. The distribution of scores on each survey item will be tabulated by treatment group after 8-weeks." (NCT03998670)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
NeverAlmost NeverSometimesOftenAlmost Always
Non-Prism Group105811
Prism Group511630

[back to top]

Suppression

"The suppression assessment is a standardized method of assessing the depth of suppression experienced while the participant is tropic (NOT aligned). Scoring is reported on an ordinal scale from 0 (no suppression) to 3 (dense suppression). Missing refers to cases in which participants were unable to understand the test and/or gave unreliable responses. As an exploratory analysis, the distribution of suppression level (none, mild, moderate, severe, missing) will be tabulated after 8 weeks by treatment group." (NCT03998670)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
None (0 suppression)Mild (1 suppression)Moderate (2 suppression)Dense (3 suppression)Missing
Non-Prism Group534103
Prism Group156121

[back to top]

Child Assessment of Symptoms - Do You Have Double Vision?

Adverse symptoms of intermittent exotropia will be summarized at the 8-week outcome exam using a symptom survey that is administered to the child. Response options are based on frequency of observations: never, sometimes, and always. The distribution of scores on each survey item will be tabulated by treatment group after 8-weeks. (NCT03998670)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
NeverSometimesAlmost Always
Non-Prism Group1771
Prism Group1780

[back to top]

Exodeviation by PACT at Distance, Continuous

The measure of ocular alignment at distance by PACT will be summarized at 8 weeks for each treatment group. A higher deviation is worse. (NCT03998670)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks

Interventionprism diopters (Mean)
Prism Group30.6
Non-Prism Group26.5

[back to top]

Exodeviation by PACT at Near, Continuous

The measure of ocular alignment at near by PACT will be summarized at 8 weeks for each treatment group. A higher deviation is worse. (NCT03998670)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks

Interventionprism diopters (Mean)
Prism Group28.7
Non-Prism Group19.0

[back to top]

Exotropia Control Score at Distance and Near, % With No Spontaneous Tropia

"The proportion of participants with no spontaneous tropia at 8 weeks will be compared between treatment groups using a two-sided Barnard's test with alpha of 0.05, with calculation of a two-sided 95% confidence interval on the difference in proportions.~No spontaneous tropia at the 8-week primary outcome exam is defined as a score of ≤2 (0, 1, or 2) on all three assessments of control at distance and at near." (NCT03998670)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Prism Group48
Non-Prism Group51

[back to top]

Exotropia Control Score at Distance, % With Treatment Response

"The secondary analysis will calculate the percentage of participants with a treatment response, defined as ≥1 point improvement in control of their distance exodeviation (average of 3 measurements) between baseline and the 8-week outcome exam." (NCT03998670)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Prism Group32
Non-Prism Group24

[back to top]

Exotropia Control Score at Distance, Continuous Change Between Baseline and 8 Weeks

Control of the exodeviation was measured at distance using the IXT Office Control Score, (Mohney, 2006) which ranges from 0 (phoria) to 5 (constant exotropia). Control levels 3-5 were assigned based on the duration of manifest exotropia during a 30-second period before any dissociation. If no exotropia was observed, control levels 0-2 were assigned based on the longest time to reestablishing fusion after 3 consecutive 10-second periods of dissociation. Control was measured at the beginning, middle, and end (3 tests) of a 20- to 40-minute office examination, and the mean was used. The change in distance control from baseline to 8 weeks will be calculated. A negative value indicates improvement. (NCT03998670)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Prism Group0.1
Non-Prism Group-0.2

[back to top]

Exotropia Control Score at Distance, Continuous Score

The primary analysis will be an intent-to-treat comparison of mean 8-week control of the distance exodeviation (average of 3 measurements) between treatment groups using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model, which adjusts for baseline distance control. Distance control scores range from 0 to 5 with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. (NCT03998670)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Prism Group3.6
Non-Prism Group3.3

[back to top]

Exotropia Control Score at Near, Continuous Score

Near control will be evaluated similarly to the primary outcome and outcome measures 2-4. Near control scores range from 0 to 5 with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. (NCT03998670)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Prism Group1.7
Non-Prism Group1.7

[back to top]

Fusional Convergence - Continuous Break Point

As an exploratory analysis, the distribution of fusional convergence amplitude (break point, blur point, and recovery) at 8 weeks will be summarized for each treatment group. Fusional amplitudes are a measure of how well a participant can converge their eyes using fusional vergence. It is measured by increasing base-out prism to the point that the participant is no longer able to control the deviation. The total amount of fusion is the magnitude of the base-out prism the participant was able to overcome plus the magnitude of the deviation. A higher number of prism diopters for break point is better than a lower number. A lower number for recovery point is better than a higher number. (NCT03998670)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks

Interventionprism diopters (Mean)
Prism Group17.8
Non-Prism Group17.5

[back to top]

Fusional Convergence - Continuous Recovery Point

As an exploratory analysis, the distribution of fusional convergence amplitude (break point, blur point, and recovery) at 8 weeks will be summarized for each treatment group. Fusional amplitudes are a measure of how well a participant can converge their eyes using fusional vergence. It is measured by increasing base-out prism to the point that the participant is no longer able to control the deviation. The total amount of fusion is the magnitude of the base-out prism the participant was able to overcome plus the magnitude of the deviation. A higher number of prism diopters for break point is better than a lower number. A lower number for recovery is better than a higher number. (NCT03998670)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks

Interventionprism diopters (Mean)
Prism Group9.4
Non-Prism Group10.6

[back to top]

Randot Preschool Stereoacuity at Near, Continuous

Randot® Preschool Stereoacuity test (Stereo Optical Co., Inc., Chicago, IL). For analysis, stereoacuity was converted from seconds of arc scores to log arcsec values (in parentheses) as follows: 40 (1.60), 60 (1.78), 100 (2.00), 200 (2.30), 400 (2.60), 800 (2.90); participants with no detectable (nil) stereoacuity were assigned the value of 1600 (3.20). The measure of Randot Preschool Stereoacuity at near will be summarized at 8 weeks for each treatment group. A lower score is better. (NCT03998670)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks

Interventionlog arc seconds (Mean)
Prism Group2.2
Non-Prism Group1.9

[back to top]

Child Assessment of Symptoms - Do You Have Problems With Your Eyes in the Sun?

Adverse symptoms of intermittent exotropia will be summarized at the 8-week outcome exam using a symptom survey that is administered to the child. Response options are based on frequency of observations: never, sometimes, and always. The distribution of scores on each survey item will be tabulated by treatment group after 8-weeks. (NCT03998670)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
NeverSometimesAlmost Always
Non-Prism Group1456
Prism Group1186

[back to top]

Child Assessment of Symptoms - Do Your Eyes Feel Funny?

Adverse symptoms of intermittent exotropia will be summarized at the 8-week outcome exam using a symptom survey that is administered to the child. Response options are based on frequency of observations: never, sometimes, and always. The distribution of scores on each survey item will be tabulated by treatment group after 8-weeks. (NCT03998670)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
NeverSometimesAlmost Always
Non-Prism Group2032
Prism Group1771

[back to top]

Child Assessment of Symptoms - Do Your Eyes go in and Out?

Adverse symptoms of intermittent exotropia will be summarized at the 8-week outcome exam using a symptom survey that is administered to the child. Response options are based on frequency of observations: never, sometimes, and always. The distribution of scores on each survey item will be tabulated by treatment group after 8-weeks. (NCT03998670)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
NeverSometimesAlmost Always
Non-Prism Group1933
Prism Group2023

[back to top]

Child Assessment of Symptoms - Do Your Eyes Hurt?

Adverse symptoms of intermittent exotropia will be summarized at the 8-week outcome exam using a symptom survey that is administered to the child. Response options are based on frequency of observations: never, sometimes, and always. The distribution of scores on each survey item will be tabulated by treatment group after 8-weeks. (NCT03998670)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
NeverSometimesAlmost Always
Non-Prism Group2230
Prism Group1564

[back to top]

Child Assessment of Symptoms - Is it Hard for You to Stare at Things?

Adverse symptoms of intermittent exotropia will be summarized at the 8-week outcome exam using a symptom survey that is administered to the child. Response options are based on frequency of observations: never, sometimes, and always. The distribution of scores on each survey item will be tabulated by treatment group after 8-weeks. (NCT03998670)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
NeverSometimesAlmost Always
Non-Prism Group1582
Prism Group1672

[back to top]

Child Assessment of Symptoms - Is it Hard to Focus Your Eyes?

Adverse symptoms of intermittent exotropia will be summarized at the 8-week outcome exam using a symptom survey that is administered to the child. Response options are based on frequency of observations: never, sometimes, and always. The distribution of scores on each survey item will be tabulated by treatment group after 8-weeks. (NCT03998670)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
NeverSometimesAlmost Always
Non-Prism Group12112
Prism Group1654

[back to top]

Compliance of Spectacle Wear

"Parents will be asked to complete a compliance calendar by recording the percentage of time their child has worn the study-prescribed spectacle correction each day. Proportion of time worn each day will be described as excellent (76% to 100%), good (51% to 75%), fair (26% to 50%), poor (1 to 25%), or none (0%). Based on review of the calendars and discussion with parents at the 8-week outcome exam, the investigator will record the total proportion of time worn as excellent (76% to 100%), good (51% to 75%), fair (26% to 50%), poor (1 to 25%), or none (0%: did not fill prescription or never picked up spectacles).~The distribution of compliance will be assessed for each treatment group at the outcome exam." (NCT03998670)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Excellent (76% to 100%)Good (51% to 75%)Fair (26% to 50%)Poor (1% to 25%)None (0%)
Non-Prism Group222100
Prism Group223000

[back to top]

Distance Visual Acuity (Snellen Equivalent)

Distance visual acuity will be assessed at the 8-week outcome exam. Any optotype method can be used for testing. The distribution of distance visual acuity Snellen Equivalents will be tabulated for each treatment group. A lower Snellen Equivalent is best. (NCT03998670)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
20/16 (best)20/2020/2520/3220/40
Non-Prism Group19834
Prism Group310921

[back to top]

Parent Assessment of Symptoms and Spectacle Wear - Has Your Child Avoided Reading or Doing Things up Close?

"Adverse symptoms of intermittent exotropia and spectacle wear will be summarized at the 8-week outcome exam using a symptom survey that is administered to the parent.~Response options are based on frequency of observations: never, almost never, sometimes, often, and almost always. The distribution of scores on each survey item will be tabulated by treatment group after 8-weeks." (NCT03998670)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
NeverAlmost NeverSometimesOftenAlmost Always
Non-Prism Group156310
Prism Group222010

[back to top]

Parent Assessment of Symptoms and Spectacle Wear - Has Your Child Complained That the Spectacles Hurt His/Her Ears and/or Nose?

"Adverse symptoms of intermittent exotropia and spectacle wear will be summarized at the 8-week outcome exam using a symptom survey that is administered to the parent.~Response options are based on frequency of observations: never, almost never, sometimes, often, and almost always. The distribution of scores on each survey item will be tabulated by treatment group after 8-weeks." (NCT03998670)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
NeverAlmost NeverSometimesOftenAlmost Always
Non-Prism Group145510
Prism Group173500

[back to top]

Parent Assessment of Symptoms and Spectacle Wear - Has Your Child Had Eyestrain?

"Adverse symptoms of intermittent exotropia and spectacle wear will be summarized at the 8-week outcome exam using a symptom survey that is administered to the parent.~Response options are based on frequency of observations: never, almost never, sometimes, often, and almost always. The distribution of scores on each survey item will be tabulated by treatment group after 8-weeks." (NCT03998670)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
NeverAlmost NeverSometimesOftenAlmost Always
Non-Prism Group114910
Prism Group165400

[back to top]

Parent Assessment of Symptoms and Spectacle Wear - Has Your Child Had Headaches?

"Adverse symptoms of intermittent exotropia and spectacle wear will be summarized at the 8-week outcome exam using a symptom survey that is administered to the parent.~Response options are based on frequency of observations: never, almost never, sometimes, often, and almost always. The distribution of scores on each survey item will be tabulated by treatment group after 8-weeks." (NCT03998670)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
NeverAlmost NeverSometimesOftenAlmost Always
Non-Prism Group146500
Prism Group158200

[back to top]

Parent Assessment of Symptoms and Spectacle Wear - Has Your Child Looked Over His or Her Spectacles?

"Adverse symptoms of intermittent exotropia and spectacle wear will be summarized at the 8-week outcome exam using a symptom survey that is administered to the parent.~Response options are based on frequency of observations: never, almost never, sometimes, often, and almost always. The distribution of scores on each survey item will be tabulated by treatment group after 8-weeks." (NCT03998670)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
NeverAlmost NeverSometimesOftenAlmost Always
Non-Prism Group143530
Prism Group127501

[back to top]

Parent Assessment of Symptoms and Spectacle Wear - Has Your Child Reported Blurry Vision?

"Adverse symptoms of intermittent exotropia and spectacle wear will be summarized at the 8-week outcome exam using a symptom survey that is administered to the parent.~Response options are based on frequency of observations: never, almost never, sometimes, often, and almost always. The distribution of scores on each survey item will be tabulated by treatment group after 8-weeks." (NCT03998670)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
NeverAlmost NeverSometimesOftenAlmost Always
Non-Prism Group213100
Prism Group212110

[back to top]

Delay Discounting for Methamphetamine

"Subjects will complete a delay discounting task in 4 sessions following 4 days of medication maintenance. Subjects are presented a series of hypothetical choices between a smaller amount of methamphetamine offered now or a larger amount of methamphetamine offered a later times in the future (e.g., 4 hours, a day, 3 weeks). The discounting rate, 'k', is calculated and log10-transformed. Greater values of log-transformed 'k' correspond with greater rates of discounting (i.e., preference for smaller reinforcer provided now rather than larger, delayed reinforcers [e.g., smaller amount of methamphetamine given now as opposed to a larger amount given later]). The units for discounting rates are theoretical and not linked to a physical dimension (e.g., number of button presses) and the range is theoretically not bound (i.e., negative infinity to positive infinity)." (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: 4 sessions over approximately 4.5 weeks

,
Interventionlog(k) (Mean)
Methylphenidate (0mg)Methylphenidate (20mg)Methylphenidate (40mg)Methylphenidate (60mg)
Active Comparator: Duloxetine (60 mg)-1.31-1.27-1.15-1.04
Placebo Comparator: Placebo-1.40-1.04-1.45-1.17

[back to top]

Reinforcing Effects of Methamphetamine Following Methylphenidate (20 mg) Maintenance.

"Number of methamphetamine doses earned by subjects on a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement. Subjects sample a dose of methamphetamine (0, 10, or 20 mg) and then have the ten opportunities (e.g., trials) to work for a 1/10th of the sampled dose via clicking on a computer mouse (i.e., 10 completed trials is the full sampled dose)." (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: Following at least 4 days of maintenance on drug during inpatient admission, up to 1 week

,
InterventionTrials Completed (Mean)
Methamphetamine (0mg)Methamphetamine (10mg)Methamphetamine (20mg)
Active Comparator: Duloxetine (60 mg)2.507.009.75
Placebo Comparator: Placebo06.678.00

[back to top]

Heart Rate After Methamphetamine Administration Following Methylphenidate (40 mg) Maintenance.

Heart Rate (beats per minute) is recorded following administration of methamphetamine. Data are presented as mean peak effect. Peak effect means the highest rated value following administration of methamphetamine (0, 10, and 20 mg) (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: Daily over approximately 1 week of inpatient stay.

,
InterventionBeats Per Minute (Mean)
Methamphetamine (0 mg)Methamphetamine (10 mg)Methamphetamine (20 mg)
Active Comparator: Duloxetine91.2587.7587.00
Placebo Comparator: Placebo85.0089.6787.67

[back to top]

Heart Rate After Methamphetamine Administration Following Methylphenidate (20 mg) Maintenance.

Heart Rate (beats per minute) is recorded following administration of methamphetamine. Data are presented as mean peak effect. Peak effect means the highest rated value following administration of methamphetamine (0, 10, and 20 mg) (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: Daily over approximately 1 week of inpatient stay.

,
InterventionBeats Per Minute (Mean)
Methamphetamine (0 mg)Methamphetamine (10 mg)Methamphetamine (20 mg)
Active Comparator: Duloxetine76.0078.5089.50
Placebo Comparator: Placebo83.6784.3385.67

[back to top]

Heart Rate After Methamphetamine Administration Following Methylphenidate (0 mg) Maintenance.

Heart Rate (beats per minute) is recorded following administration of methamphetamine. Data are presented as mean peak effect. Peak effect means the highest rated value following administration of methamphetamine (0, 10, and 20 mg) (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: Daily over approximately 1 week of inpatient stay.

,
InterventionBeats Per Minute (Mean)
Methamphetamine (0 mg)Methamphetamine (10 mg)Methamphetamine (20 mg)
Active Comparator: Duloxetine78.0077.2583.75
Placebo Comparator: Placebo77.6787.3381.33

[back to top]

Diastolic Blood Pressure After Methamphetamine Administration Following Methylphenidate (60 mg) Maintenance.

Diastolic blood pressure (millimeter of mercury) is recorded following administration of methamphetamine. Data are presented as mean peak effect. Peak effect means the highest rated value following administration of methamphetamine (0, 10, and 20 mg) (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: Daily over approximately 1 week of inpatient stay.

,
InterventionMillimeter of Mercury (Mean)
Methamphetamine (0 mg)Methamphetamine (10 mg)Methamphetamine (20 mg)
Active Comparator: Duloxetine82.2582.2584.25
Placebo Comparator: Placebo82.6781.6788.33

[back to top]

Diastolic Blood Pressure After Methamphetamine Administration Following Methylphenidate (40 mg) Maintenance.

Diastolic blood pressure (millimeter of mercury) is recorded following administration of methamphetamine. Data are presented as mean peak effect. Peak effect means the highest rated value following administration of methamphetamine (0, 10, and 20 mg) (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: Daily over approximately 1 week of inpatient stay.

,
InterventionMillimeter of Mercury (Mean)
Methamphetamine (0 mg)Methamphetamine (10 mg)Methamphetamine (20 mg)
Active Comparator: Duloxetine81.0082.2585.00
Placebo Comparator: Placebo78.0084.6784.67

[back to top]

Diastolic Blood Pressure After Methamphetamine Administration Following Methylphenidate (20 mg) Maintenance.

Diastolic blood pressure (millimeter of mercury) is recorded following administration of methamphetamine. Data are presented as mean peak effect. Peak effect means the highest rated value following administration of methamphetamine (0, 10, and 20 mg) (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: Daily over approximately 1 week of inpatient stay.

,
InterventionMillimeter of Mercury (Mean)
Methamphetamine (0 mg)Methamphetamine (10 mg)Methamphetamine (20 mg)
Active Comparator: Duloxetine74.5083.2585.00
Placebo Comparator: Placebo81.6785.3383.00

[back to top]

Diastolic Blood Pressure After Methamphetamine Administration Following Methylphenidate (0 mg) Maintenance.

Diastolic blood pressure (millimeter of mercury) is recorded following administration of methamphetamine. Data are presented as mean peak effect. Peak effect means the highest rated value following administration of methamphetamine (0, 10, and 20 mg) (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: Daily over approximately 1 week of inpatient stay.

,
InterventionMillimeter of Mercury (Mean)
Methamphetamine (0 mg)Methamphetamine (10 mg)Methamphetamine (20 mg)
Active Comparator: Duloxetine78.5083.7586.25
Placebo Comparator: Placebo80.0082.3387.33

[back to top]

Delay Discounting for Money

"Subjects will complete a delay discounting task in 4 sessions following 4 days of medication maintenance. Subjects are presented a series of hypothetical choices between a smaller sum of money offered now or a larger sum of money offered a later times in the future (e.g., 4 hours, a day, 3 weeks). The discounting rate, 'k', is calculated and log10-transformed. Greater values of log-transformed 'k' correspond with greater rates of discounting (i.e., preference for smaller reinforcer provided now rather than larger, delayed reinforcers [e.g., smaller sum of money given now as opposed to a larger sum given later]). The units for discounting rates are theoretical and not linked to a physical dimension (e.g., number of button presses) and the range is theoretically not bound (i.e., negative infinity to positive infinity)." (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: 4 sessions over approximately 4.5 weeks

,
Interventionlog(k) (Mean)
Methylphenidate (0mg)Methylphenidate (20mg)Methylphenidate (40mg)Methylphenidate (60mg)
Active Comparator: Duloxetine (60 mg)-1.29-1.37-1.15-1.04
Placebo Comparator: Placebo-1.40-1.40-1.45-1.48

[back to top]

Attentional Bias

"Subjects will complete an attentional bias task. The number of inhibitory failures (i.e., commission errors) to no-go targets following methamphetamine-related stimuli will be used to evaluate attentional bias (range 0 - 1: greater values represent greater number of errors committed). Commission errors are when you response (i.e., press the corresponding key on a computer) when you were instructed not to respond." (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: 12 sessions over approximately 4.5 weeks

,
InterventionProportion of Responses (Mean)
Methylphenidate (0mg)Methylphenidate (20mg)Methylphenidate (40mg)Methylphenidate (60mg)
Active Comparator: Duloxetine (60 mg)0.080.130.110.12
Placebo Comparator: Placebo0.070.040.080.12

[back to top]

Reinforcing Effects of Methamphetamine Following Methylphenidate (0 mg; Placebo) Maintenance.

"Number of methamphetamine doses earned by subjects on a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement. Subjects sample a dose of methamphetamine (0, 10, or 20 mg) and then have ten opportunities (e.g., trials) to work for a 1/10th of the sampled dose via clicking on a computer mouse (i.e., 10 completed trials is the full sampled dose)." (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: Following at least 4 days of maintenance on placebo during inpatient admission, up to 1 week

,
InterventionTrials Completed (Mean)
Methamphetamine (0mg)Methamphetamine (10mg)Methamphetamine (20mg)
Active Comparator: Duloxetine (60 mg)07.259.75
Placebo Comparator: Placebo03.3310

[back to top]

Heart Rate After Methamphetamine Administration Following Methylphenidate (60 mg) Maintenance.

Heart Rate (beats per minute) is recorded following administration of methamphetamine. Data are presented as mean peak effect. Peak effect means the highest rated value following administration of methamphetamine (0, 10, and 20 mg) (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: Daily over approximately 1 week of inpatient stay.

,
InterventionBeats Per Minute (Mean)
Methamphetamine (0 mg)Methamphetamine (10 mg)Methamphetamine (20 mg)
Active Comparator: Duloxetine88.0087.5088.00
Placebo Comparator: Placebo87.3383.6799.67

[back to top]

Temperature After Methamphetamine Administration Following Methylphenidate (60 mg) Maintenance.

Oral temperature (degrees fahrenheit) is recorded following administration of methamphetamine. Data are presented as mean peak effect. Peak effect means the highest rated value following administration of methamphetamine (0, 10, and 20 mg) (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: Daily over approximately 1 week of inpatient stay.

,
InterventionDegrees Fahrenheit (Mean)
Methamphetamine (0 mg)Methamphetamine (10 mg)Methamphetamine (20 mg)
Active Comparator: Duloxetine98.6598.6598.58
Placebo Comparator: Placebo98.3798.4398.47

[back to top]

Temperature After Methamphetamine Administration Following Methylphenidate (40 mg) Maintenance.

Oral temperature (degrees fahrenheit) is recorded following administration of methamphetamine. Data are presented as mean peak effect. Peak effect means the highest rated value following administration of methamphetamine (0, 10, and 20 mg) (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: Daily over approximately 1 week of inpatient stay.

,
InterventionDegrees Fahrenheit (Mean)
Methamphetamine (0 mg)Methamphetamine (10 mg)Methamphetamine (20 mg)
Active Comparator: Duloxetine98.6098.6598.55
Placebo Comparator: Placebo98.1798.1398.43

[back to top]

Temperature After Methamphetamine Administration Following Methylphenidate (0 mg) Maintenance.

Oral temperature (degrees fahrenheit) is recorded following administration of methamphetamine. Data are presented as mean peak effect. Peak effect means the highest rated value following administration of methamphetamine (0, 10, and 20 mg) (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: Daily over approximately 1 week of inpatient stay.

,
InterventionDegrees Fahrenheit (Mean)
Methamphetamine (0 mg)Methamphetamine (10 mg)Methamphetamine (20 mg)
Active Comparator: Duloxetine98.4598.4898.48
Placebo Comparator: Placebo98.1098.2398.40

[back to top]

Systolic Blood Pressure After Methamphetamine Administration Following Methylphenidate (60 mg) Maintenance.

Systolic blood pressure (millimeter of mercury) is recorded following administration of methamphetamine. Data are presented as mean peak effect. Peak effect means the highest rated value following administration of methamphetamine (0, 10, and 20 mg) (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: Daily over approximately 1 week of inpatient stay.

,
InterventionMillimeter of Mercury (Mean)
Methamphetamine (0 mg)Methamphetamine (10 mg)Methamphetamine (20 mg)
Active Comparator: Duloxetine127.00129.75135.25
Placebo Comparator: Placebo139.00138.67139.67

[back to top]

Systolic Blood Pressure After Methamphetamine Administration Following Methylphenidate (40 mg) Maintenance.

Systolic blood pressure (millimeter of mercury) is recorded following administration of methamphetamine. Data are presented as mean peak effect. Peak effect means the highest rated value following administration of methamphetamine (0, 10, and 20 mg) (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: Daily over approximately 1 week of inpatient stay.

,
InterventionMillimeter of Mercury (Mean)
Methamphetamine (0 mg)Methamphetamine (10 mg)Methamphetamine (20 mg)
Active Comparator: Duloxetine129.75132.25139.25
Placebo Comparator: Placebo133.33129.00130.00

[back to top]

Systolic Blood Pressure After Methamphetamine Administration Following Methylphenidate (20 mg) Maintenance.

Systolic blood pressure (millimeter of mercury) is recorded following administration of methamphetamine. Data are presented as mean peak effect. Peak effect means the highest rated value following administration of methamphetamine (0, 10, and 20 mg) (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: Daily over approximately 1 week of inpatient stay.

,
InterventionMillimeter of Mercury (Mean)
Methamphetamine (0 mg)Methamphetamine (10 mg)Methamphetamine (20 mg)
Active Comparator: Duloxetine124.25128.00132.75
Placebo Comparator: Placebo129.67131.67130.33

[back to top]

Systolic Blood Pressure After Methamphetamine Administration Following Methylphenidate (0 mg) Maintenance.

Systolic blood pressure (millimeter of mercury) is recorded following administration of methamphetamine. Data are presented as mean peak effect. Peak effect means the highest rated value following administration of methamphetamine (0, 10, and 20 mg) (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: Daily over approximately 1 week of inpatient stay.

,
InterventionMillimeter of Mercury (Mean)
Methamphetamine (0 mg)Methamphetamine (10 mg)Methamphetamine (20 mg)
Active Comparator: Duloxetine128.75131.00144.25
Placebo Comparator: Placebo132.67133.00132.67

[back to top]

Subjective Effects of Methamphetamine (20 mg) Administration Following Methylphenidate (60 mg) Maintenance.

Subjective effects (i.e., mood) of methamphetamine are recorded following administration. Data are presented as mean peak effect. Peak effect means the highest rated value (0 - 100 mm) following administration of methamphetamine. (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: Daily over approximately 1 week of inpatient stay.

,
InterventionMillimeters (Mean)
Sluggish/Fatigued/LazyRestlessNervous/AnxiousNauseated/Queasy/Sick to StomachTalkative/FriendlyIrregular/Racing HeartbeatEuphoricShaky/JitteryActive/Alert/EnergeticWill Pay ForWill Take AgainPerformance ImprovedPerformance ImpairedStimulatedLike DrugRushHighGood EffectsBad EffectsAny Effect
Active Comparator: Duloxetine0.001.250.000.0018.251.0018.000.2521.5018.7521.5018.7513.5020.2521.502.5020.2520.250.0019.25
Placebo Comparator: Placebo6.670.000.330.0029.3330.6732.332.0037.3334.0037.6722.0010.3336.0036.3335.6737.0039.009.6738.00

[back to top]

Subjective Effects of Methamphetamine (20 mg) Administration Following Methylphenidate (40 mg) Maintenance.

Subjective effects (i.e., mood) of methamphetamine are recorded following administration. Data are presented as mean peak effect. Peak effect means the highest rated value (0 - 100 mm) following administration of methamphetamine. (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: Daily over approximately 1 week of inpatient stay.

,
InterventionMillimeters (Mean)
Sluggish/Fatigued/LazyRestlessNervous/AnxiousNauseated/Queasy/Sick to StomachTalkative/FriendlyIrregular/Racing HeartbeatEuphoricShaky/JitteryActive/Alert/EnergeticWill Pay ForWill Take AgainPerformance ImprovedPerformance ImpairedStimulatedLike DrugRushHighGood EffectsBad EffectsAny Effect
Active Comparator: Duloxetine0.001.250.000.0015.500.7514.751.2524.7521.2523.7515.000.0023.2524.756.7520.5022.750.0019.50
Placebo Comparator: Placebo1.330.330.000.0025.332.3333.007.0028.0038.0041.6712.335.3331.6734.3329.0028.0035.0012.0033.67

[back to top]

Subjective Effects of Methamphetamine (20 mg) Administration Following Methylphenidate (20 mg) Maintenance.

Subjective effects (i.e., mood) of methamphetamine are recorded following administration. Data are presented as mean peak effect. Peak effect means the highest rated value (0 - 100 mm) following administration of methamphetamine. (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: Daily over approximately 1 week of inpatient stay.

,
InterventionMillimeters (Mean)
Sluggish/Fatigued/LazyRestlessNervous/AnxiousNauseated/Queasy/Sick to StomachTalkative/FriendlyIrregular/Racing HeartbeatEuphoricShaky/JitteryActive/Alert/EnergeticWill Pay ForWill Take AgainPerformance ImprovedPerformance ImpairedStimulatedLike DrugRushHighGood EffectsBad EffectsAny Effect
Active Comparator: Duloxetine0.001.000.000.5014.503.5014.250.0024.5017.2524.7514.500.2519.7518.7512.7516.5014.250.0013.75
Placebo Comparator: Placebo4.339.333.331.6722.673.0033.331.3330.0045.6748.0016.6711.3336.6747.3333.3333.3335.676.3336.33

[back to top]

Subjective Effects of Methamphetamine (0 mg) Administration Following Methylphenidate (20 mg) Maintenance.

Subjective effects (i.e., mood) of methamphetamine are recorded following administration. Data are presented as mean peak effect. Peak effect means the highest rated value (0 - 100 mm) following administration of methamphetamine. (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: Daily over approximately 1 week of inpatient stay.

,
InterventionMillimeters (Mean)
Sluggish/Fatigued/LazyRestlessNervous/AnxiousNauseated/Queasy/Sick to StomachTalkative/FriendlyIrregular/Racing HeartbeatEuphoricShaky/JitteryActive/Alert/EnergeticWill Pay ForWill Take AgainPerformance ImprovedPerformance ImpairedStimulatedLike DrugRushHighGood EffectsBad EffectsAny Effect
Active Comparator: Duloxetine0.001.000.000.000.750.250.000.000.751.001.500.750.250.251.500.001.501.500.001.50
Placebo Comparator: Placebo3.001.331.671.674.001.674.003.003.338.0011.672.672.334.677.674.674.334.002.673.67

[back to top]

Subjective Effects of Methamphetamine (20 mg) Administration Following Methylphenidate (0 mg) Maintenance.

Subjective effects (i.e., mood) of methamphetamine are recorded following administration. Data are presented as mean peak effect. Peak effect means the highest rated value (0 - 100 mm) following administration of methamphetamine. (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: Daily over approximately 1 week of inpatient stay.

,
InterventionMillimeters (Mean)
Sluggish/Fatigued/LazyRestlessNervous/AnxiousNauseated/Queasy/Sick to StomachTalkative/FriendlyIrregular/Racing HeartbeatEuphoricShaky/JitteryActive/Alert/EnergeticWill Pay ForWill Take AgainPerformance ImprovedPerformance ImpairedStimulatedLike DrugRushHighGood EffectsBad EffectsAny Effect
Active Comparator: Duloxetine0.000.500.000.0013.754.2516.000.0027.9920.5025.2512.000.2523.5026.2516.0020.5023.000.2524.50
Placebo Comparator: Placebo10.330.670.670.3320.001.0021.670.6735.6736.6750.0026.3332.6738.3337.6731.3336.6730.3323.6738.33

[back to top]

Subjective Effects of Methamphetamine (10 mg) Administration Following Methylphenidate (60 mg) Maintenance.

Subjective effects (i.e., mood) of methamphetamine are recorded following administration. Data are presented as mean peak effect. Peak effect means the highest rated value (0 - 100 mm) following administration of methamphetamine. (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: Daily over approximately 1 week of inpatient stay.

,
InterventionMillimeters (Mean)
Sluggish/Fatigued/LazyRestlessNervous/AnxiousNauseated/Queasy/Sick to StomachTalkative/FriendlyIrregular/Racing HeartbeatEuphoricShaky/JitteryActive/Alert/EnergeticWill Pay ForWill Take AgainPerformance ImprovedPerformance ImpairedStimulatedLike DrugRushHighGood EffectsBad EffectsAny Effect
Active Comparator: Duloxetine0.001.000.000.0011.003.7511.752.0023.0018.0023.759.500.0017.2523.7510.7515.7520.250.0020.75
Placebo Comparator: Placebo0.005.000.004.6729.000.0028.333.6725.0036.0033.3314.675.3333.0032.6727.3327.0025.334.6724.67

[back to top]

Subjective Effects of Methamphetamine (10 mg) Administration Following Methylphenidate (40 mg) Maintenance.

Subjective effects (i.e., mood) of methamphetamine are recorded following administration. Data are presented as mean peak effect. Peak effect means the highest rated value (0 - 100 mm) following administration of methamphetamine. (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: Daily over approximately 1 week of inpatient stay.

,
InterventionMillimeters (Mean)
Sluggish/Fatigued/LazyRestlessNervous/AnxiousNauseated/Queasy/Sick to StomachTalkative/FriendlyIrregular/Racing HeartbeatEuphoricShaky/JitteryActive/Alert/EnergeticWill Pay ForWill Take AgainPerformance ImprovedPerformance ImpairedStimulatedLike DrugRushHighGood EffectsBad EffectsAny Effect
Active Comparator: Duloxetine5.501.000.000.2513.751.259.750.0020.2517.0017.2511.252.259.5015.004.5010.259.252.5011.50
Placebo Comparator: Placebo8.675.333.002.0018.672.0030.006.3322.3333.0039.3320.006.0031.3333.6730.0030.3331.333.6730.33

[back to top]

Subjective Effects of Methamphetamine (10 mg) Administration Following Methylphenidate (20 mg) Maintenance.

Subjective effects (i.e., mood) of methamphetamine are recorded following administration. Data are presented as mean peak effect. Peak effect means the highest rated value (0 - 100 mm) following administration of methamphetamine. (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: Daily over approximately 1 week of inpatient stay.

,
InterventionMillimeters (Mean)
Sluggish/Fatigued/LazyRestlessNervous/AnxiousNauseated/Queasy/Sick to StomachTalkative/FriendlyIrregular/Racing HeartbeatEuphoricShaky/JitteryActive/Alert/EnergeticWill Pay ForWill Take AgainPerformance ImprovedPerformance ImpairedStimulatedLike DrugRushHighGood EffectsBad EffectsAny Effect
Active Comparator: Duloxetine0.500.500.000.0013.750.0013.000.0016.2518.5021.7513.000.0011.7514.003.0014.259.750.2514.75
Placebo Comparator: Placebo10.672.002.000.3314.670.0022.000.6717.3333.3340.0015.005.6720.3335.3319.0021.6721.006.3316.00

[back to top]

Subjective Effects of Methamphetamine (10 mg) Administration Following Methylphenidate (0 mg) Maintenance.

Subjective effects (i.e., mood) of methamphetamine are recorded following administration. Data are presented as mean peak effect. Peak effect means the highest rated value (0 - 100 mm) following administration of methamphetamine. (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: Daily over approximately 1 week of inpatient stay.

,
InterventionMillimeters (Mean)
Sluggish/Fatigued/LazyRestlessNervous/AnxiousNauseated/Queasy/Sick to StomachTalkative/FriendlyIrregular/Racing HeartbeatEuphoricShaky/JitteryActive/Alert/EnergeticWill Pay ForWill Take AgainPerformance ImprovedPerformance ImpairedStimulatedLike DrugRushHighGood EffectsBad EffectsAny Effect
Active Comparator: Duloxetine0.001.000.000.0012.502.2518.250.0025.5022.2523.5011.500.0014.2515.008.2512.0013.750.0016.00
Placebo Comparator: Placebo22.331.000.673.004.330.3315.671.0015.3323.0046.337.0011.3321.3333.6710.679.3312.672.6712.67

[back to top]

Temperature After Methamphetamine Administration Following Methylphenidate (20 mg) Maintenance.

Oral temperature (degrees fahrenheit) is recorded following administration of methamphetamine. Data are presented as mean peak effect. Peak effect means the highest rated value following administration of methamphetamine (0, 10, and 20 mg) (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: Daily over approximately 1 week of inpatient stay.

,
InterventionDegrees Fahrenheit (Mean)
Methamphetamine (0 mg)Methamphetamine (10 mg)Methamphetamine (20 mg)
Active Comparator: Duloxetine98.5098.7598.35
Placebo Comparator: Placebo98.3798.1098.27

[back to top]

Subjective Effects of Methamphetamine (0 mg) Administration Following Methylphenidate (60 mg) Maintenance.

Subjective effects (i.e., mood) of methamphetamine are recorded following administration. Data are presented as mean peak effect. Peak effect means the highest rated value (0 - 100 mm) following administration of methamphetamine. (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: Daily over approximately 1 week of inpatient stay.

,
InterventionMillimeters (Mean)
Sluggish/Fatigued/LazyRestlessNervous/AnxiousNauseated/Queasy/Sick to StomachTalkative/FriendlyIrregular/Racing HeartbeatEuphoricShaky/JitteryActive/Alert/EnergeticWill Pay ForWill Take AgainPerformance ImprovedPerformance ImpairedStimulatedLike DrugRushHighGood EffectsBad EffectsAny Effect
Active Comparator: Duloxetine0.000.000.000.000.000.500.000.000.250.003.000.000.000.000.500.002.000.750.003.50
Placebo Comparator: Placebo0.000.000.000.0012.330.0015.330.0014.0032.3331.009.0014.3324.0029.6713.3312.0013.673.0015.33

[back to top]

Subjective Effects of Methamphetamine (0 mg) Administration Following Methylphenidate (40 mg) Maintenance.

Subjective effects (i.e., mood) of methamphetamine are recorded following administration. Data are presented as mean peak effect. Peak effect means the highest rated value (0 - 100 mm) following administration of methamphetamine. (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: Daily over approximately 1 week of inpatient stay.

,
InterventionMillimeters (Mean)
Sluggish/Fatigued/LazyRestlessNervous/AnxiousNauseated/Queasy/Sick to StomachTalkative/FriendlyIrregular/Racing HeartbeatEuphoricShaky/JitteryActive/Alert/EnergeticWill Pay ForWill Take AgainPerformance ImprovedPerformance ImpairedStimulatedLike DrugRushHighGood EffectsBad EffectsAny Effect
Active Comparator: Duloxetine0.000.500.000.000.500.000.000.000.500.751.000.000.000.501.250.001.251.250.004.25
Placebo Comparator: Placebo0.000.000.000.008.000.677.000.6710.3317.3323.006.677.6717.3316.338.0010.678.336.337.00

[back to top]

Subjective Effects of Methamphetamine (0 mg) Administration Following Methylphenidate (0 mg) Maintenance.

Subjective effects (i.e., mood) of methamphetamine are recorded following administration. Data are presented as mean peak effect. Peak effect means the highest rated value (0 - 100 mm) following administration of methamphetamine. (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: Daily over approximately 1 week of inpatient stay.

,
InterventionMillimeters (Mean)
Sluggish/Fatigued/LazyRestlessNervous/AnxiousNauseated/Queasy/Sick to StomachTalkative/FriendlyIrregular/Racing HeartbeatEuphoricShaky/JitteryActive/Alert/EnergeticWill Pay ForWill Take AgainPerformance ImprovedPerformance ImpairedStimulatedLike DrugRushHighGood EffectsBad EffectsAny Effect
Active Comparator: Duloxetine0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.001.500.251.500.000.002.250.000.250.000.250.001.25
Placebo Comparator: Placebo1.331.001.001.001.001.330.671.331.331.331.671.331.001.001.001.000.671.331.001.00

[back to top]

Snaith-Hamilton-Pleasure Scale to Measure Anhedonia (Inability to Experience Pleasure)

A 14-item Snaith-Hamilton-Pleasure Scale covers four domains of pleasure response (interest/pastimes, social interaction, sensory experience and food/drink) with higher scores representing less anhedonia. Scores range from 0 to 56 units: lower scores representing greater anhedonia. (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: 4 times over approximately 4.5 weeks

,
InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Methylphenidate (0 mg)Methylphenidate (20 mg)Methylphenidate (40 mg)Methylphenidate (60 mg)
Active Comparator: Duloxetine (60 mg)51.2552.7554.0053.00
Placebo Comparator: Placebo44.3344.0044.3344.67

[back to top]

Reinforcing Effects of Methamphetamine Following Methylphenidate (60 mg) Maintenance.

"Number of methamphetamine doses earned by subjects on a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement. Subjects sample a dose of methamphetamine (0, 10, or 20 mg) and then have the ten opportunities (e.g., trials) to work for a 1/10th of the sampled dose via clicking on a computer mouse (i.e., 10 completed trials is the full sampled dose)." (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: Following at least 4 days of maintenance on drug during inpatient admission, up to 1 week

,
InterventionTrials Completed (Mean)
Methamphetamine (0mg)Methamphetamine (10mg)Methamphetamine (20mg)
Active Comparator: Duloxetine (60 mg)07.509.75
Placebo Comparator: Placebo2.333.3310

[back to top]

Reinforcing Effects of Methamphetamine Following Methylphenidate (40 mg) Maintenance.

"Number of methamphetamine doses earned by subjects on a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement. Subjects sample a dose of methamphetamine (0, 10, or 20 mg) and then have the ten opportunities (e.g., trials) to work for a 1/10th of the sampled dose via clicking on a computer mouse (i.e., 10 completed trials is the full sampled dose)." (NCT04178993)
Timeframe: Following at least 4 days of maintenance on drug during inpatient admission, up to 1 week

,
InterventionTrials Completed (Mean)
Methamphetamine (0mg)Methamphetamine (10mg)Methamphetamine (20mg)
Active Comparator: Duloxetine05.0010
Placebo Comparator: Placebo1.671010

[back to top]

Change in Non-school Night Sleep Onset Time

The time in hours that sleep onset time shifted earlier during non-school nights. Measured by self-reporting logs and a wrist actigraphy that detects when subjects are active or sleeping. (NCT04378933)
Timeframe: baseline, week 3

Interventionhours (Mean)
Amber Glasses and Fixed Wake1.1
Clear Glasses and Free Wake0.03

[back to top]

Change in Dim Light Melatonin Onset (DLMO)

"The time of day the subject feels sleepy during the overnight lab stays. It is a marker of biological time. Data are provided in decimal and military time (e.g., 10:00 pm equals 22.00).~Using a light lux meter, the lighting in the room was limited to no more than 5 lux of light. Measured by self-reported logs and a wrist actigraphy that detects when subjects are active or sleeping." (NCT04378933)
Timeframe: baseline, week 3

,
Interventiondecimal military time (Mean)
baselineweek 3
Amber Glasses and Fixed Wake21.5121.11
Clear Glasses and Free Wake22.3623.05

[back to top]

Change in School Night Sleep Onset Time

The time in hours that sleep onset time shifted earlier during school nights. Measured by self-reporting logs and a wrist actigraphy that detects when subjects are active or sleeping. (NCT04378933)
Timeframe: baseline, week 3

Interventionhours (Mean)
Amber Glasses and Fixed Wake0.4
Clear Glasses and Free Wake0.6

[back to top]

Change in Dim Light Melatonin Onset (DLMO) Phase Shift

The time in hours the circadian clock shifted the sleep onset time. Using a light lux meter, the lighting in the room will be limited to no more than 5 lux of light. Measured by self-reported logs and a wrist actigraphy that detects when subjects are active or sleeping. (NCT04378933)
Timeframe: baseline, week 2

Interventionhours (Mean)
Amber Glasses and Fixed Wake1.0
Clear Glasses and Free Wake0.4

[back to top]