Page last updated: 2024-12-11

fesoterodine

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

fesoterodine: a muscarinic antagonist for treatment of overactive bladder [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID6918558
CHEMBL ID1201764
CHEBI ID135920
SCHEMBL ID121127
MeSH IDM0518591

Synonyms (43)

Synonym
AB01274866-01
AKOS015841710
fesoterodine (inn)
D07226
CHEBI:135920
fesoterodine
feso
DB06702
[2-[(1r)-3-[di(propan-2-yl)amino]-1-phenylpropyl]-4-(hydroxymethyl)phenyl] 2-methylpropanoate
621g617227 ,
fesoterodine [inn:ban]
unii-621g617227
propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, 2-((1r)-3-(bis(1-methylethyl)amino)-1-phenylpropyl)-4-(hydroxymethyl)phenyl ester
286930-02-7
DCCSDBARQIPTGU-HSZRJFAPSA-N
CHEMBL1201764
NCGC00346540-01
fesoterodine [vandf]
fesoterodine [who-dd]
fesoterodine [mi]
fesoterodine [mart.]
fesoterodine [inn]
CS-M2392
SCHEMBL121127
[2-[(1r)-3-(di(propan-2-yl)amino)-1-phenylpropyl]-4-(hydroxymethyl)phenyl] 2-methylpropanoate
gtpl7473
AC-32493
AB01274866_02
DTXSID80182853 ,
2-[(1r)-3-[bis(propan-2-yl)amino]-1-phenylpropyl]-4-(hydroxymethyl)phenyl 2-methylpropanoate
(r) fesoterodine
NCGC00346540-02
Q4482372
(r)-2-(3-(diisopropylamino)-1-phenylpropyl)-4-(hydroxymethyl)phenyl isobutyrate
HY-70053
NCGC00346540-03
STARBLD0000599
dtxcid20105344
fesoterodinum
g04bd11
fesoterodine (mart.)
fesoterodina
EN300-25668967

Research Excerpts

Overview

Fesoterodine is a muscarinic receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) in adults and neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) in pediatric patients. The drug is a prodrug that is structurally and functionally associated with tolterodine and it is the novel drug for OAB treatment.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Fesoterodine is a muscarinic receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) in adults and neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) in pediatric patients. "( Population Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Fesoterodine in Pediatric Patients with Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity.
Darekar, A; Malhotra, BK; Sano, Y; Shahin, M; Shoji, S; Sweeney, K, 2023
)
2.6
"Fesoterodine is a muscarinic receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) in adults and neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) in pediatric patients in the US. "( Population Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Fesoterodine in Pediatric Patients with Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity.
Darekar, A; Malhotra, BK; Sano, Y; Shahin, M; Shoji, S; Sweeney, K, 2023
)
2.6
"Fesoterodine seems to be a valid treatment option for neurogenic detrusor overactivity and/or low compliance bladder in neurogenic bladder patients."( Urodynamic efficacy of fesoterodine for the treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity and/or low compliance bladder.
Fuse, M; Ishizuka, M; Kaga, K; Kaga, M; Kamasako, T; Yamanishi, T, 2020
)
2.31
"Fesoterodine is a prodrug that is structurally and functionally associated with tolterodine and it is the novel drug for OAB treatment."( [A role of fesoterodine in treatment of overactive bladder].
Kasyan, GR; Kupriyanov, YA; Pushkar, DY, 2018
)
1.59
"Fesoterodine fumarate is an approved drug for overactive bladder. "( Evaluation of fesoterodine fumarate for the treatment of an overactive bladder.
Dmochowski, RR; Mock, S, 2013
)
2.19
"Fesoterodine is an anti-muscarinic agent with a unique pharmacokinetic profile. "( Evaluation of fesoterodine fumarate for the treatment of an overactive bladder.
Dmochowski, RR; Mock, S, 2013
)
2.19
"Fesoterodine is a newly approved drug for the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome."( Fesoterodine: a novel muscarinic receptor antagonist for the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome.
Michel, MC, 2008
)
3.23
"Fesoterodine functions as an orally active prodrug that is converted to the active metabolite 5-hydroxymethyltolterodine by non-specific esterases. "( Fesoterodine: a novel muscarinic receptor antagonist for the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome.
Michel, MC, 2008
)
3.23
"Fesoterodine is a new antimuscarinic agent for the treatment of overactive bladder. "( Pharmacokinetic profile of fesoterodine.
Gandelman, K; Guan, Z; Malhotra, B; Wood, N, 2008
)
2.09
"Fesoterodine is a new antimuscarinic agent developed for the treatment of overactive bladder. "( The pharmacokinetic profile of fesoterodine: similarities and differences to tolterodine.
Malhotra, B; Simon, HU, 2009
)
2.08
"Fesoterodine is an efficacious, well-tolerated treatment for OAB."( Fesoterodine: a new agent for treating overactive bladder.
Berriman, SJ; Brodsky, M; Ellsworth, P, 2009
)
3.24
"Fesoterodine is a new, once-daily, oral, antimuscarinic agent indicated for the treatment of overactive bladder. "( Influence of food on the pharmacokinetic profile of fesoterodine.
Malhotra, B; Sachse, R; Wood, N, 2009
)
2.05
"Fesoterodine is a new antimuscarinic that shares the same active metabolite as tolterodine and may provide less pharmacokinetic variability."( Tolterodine extended-release for overactive bladder.
Chung, DE; Te, AE, 2009
)
1.07
"Fesoterodine is a new antimuscarinic drug for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB)."( The pharmacokinetic profile of fesoterodine 8 mg with daytime or nighttime dosing.
Crownover, PH; Glue, P; LaBadie, R; MacDiarmid, SA; Malhotra, BK, 2010
)
1.37
"Fesoterodine is an antimuscarinic agent indicated for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms. "( Efficacy of fesoterodine over 24 hours in subjects with overactive bladder.
Guan, Z; Michel, MC; Morrow, JD; Nitti, V; Staskin, D; Wang, J, 2010
)
2.18
"Fesoterodine is an antimuscarinic for the treatment of overactive bladder, a syndrome of urgency, with or without urgency urinary incontinence (UUI), usually with increased daytime frequency and nocturia. "( Modeling dose-response relationships of the effects of fesoterodine in patients with overactive bladder.
Cardozo, L; El-Tahtawy, A; Guan, Z; Khullar, V; Malhotra, B; Staskin, D, 2010
)
2.05
"Fesoterodine is a pro-drug of the active metabolite 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine (5-HMT), a muscarinic receptor antagonist. "( Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of fesoterodine sustained-release in healthy Korean volunteers.
Cho, JY; Jang, IJ; Lee, S; Lim, KS; Shin, D; Shin, KH; Shin, SG; Yu, KS, 2012
)
2.1
"Fesoterodine is a non-selective muscarinic-receptor antagonist, used in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome. "( Investigation of ex vivo stability of fesoterodine in human plasma and its simultaneous determination together with its active metabolite 5-HMT by LC-ESI-MS/MS: Application to a bioequivalence study.
Parekh, JM; Sanyal, M; Shrivastav, PS; Yadav, M, 2013
)
2.1
"Fesoterodine fumarate is an optimal treatment option when the clinical response to anticholinergics has not been satisfactory, either by the lack of therapeutic action or by intolerance to side effects, and especially when the treatment is expected to be long."( [New perspectives of treatment with fesoterodine fumarate in patients with overactive bladder].
Álvarez-Ossorio, JL; Fernández, MA; García, MV; García-Baquero, R; Madurga, B; Rosety, JM, 2013
)
2.11

Effects

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Fesoterodine has a favorable benefit-risk profile in 6‒<18-year-old patients with NDO and may represent an additional option for pediatric NDO treatment."( Fesoterodine treatment of pediatric patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity: A 24-week, randomized, open-label, phase 3 study.
Crook, TJ; Darekar, A; Jones, P; Kitta, T; Lindsay, M; Malhotra, B; Mallen, S; Nieto, A; Shahin, MH, 2023
)
3.8

Actions

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Fesoterodine was found to produce significant improvements in the treatment of overactive bladder symptoms compared with placebo."( Fesoterodine for the treatment of overactive bladder.
Dolder, C; Olin, JL; Tzefos, M, 2009
)
2.52

Treatment

Fesoterodine treatment had slightly higher total costs than mirabegron (3,296€vs. 3,300€) Treatment led to clinically meaningful improvements across all included patient reported outcomes.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Fesoterodine-treated patients received 4 mg/d during the first week and 8 mg/d thereafter."( Do patient characteristics predict responsiveness to treatment of overactive bladder with antimuscarinic agents?
Herschorn, S; Kaplan, SA; Ntanios, F; Sun, F, 2014
)
1.12
"Fesoterodine treatment also had slightly higher total costs than mirabegron (3,296€vs."( Cost effectiveness analysis of fesoterodine compared to mirabegron in first-line therapy setting for overactive bladder with urge urinary incontinence, from the Spanish National Health System perspective.
Angulo, JC; Liu, S; Luo, X; Peral, C; Ramos, J; Rejas, J; Sánchez-Ballester, F; Snedecor, SJ; Sudharshan, L, 2016
)
1.44
"fesoterodine treatment led to clinically meaningful improvements across all included patient reported outcomes. "( A pooled analysis of the efficacy of fesoterodine for the treatment of overactive bladder, and the relationship between safety, co-morbidity and polypharmacy in patients aged 65 years or older.
Angulo Cuesta, J; Arumi, D; Carlsson, M; Haab, F; Herschorn, S; Ntanios, F; Oelke, M; Wagg, A, 2017
)
2.17
"Treated with fesoterodine (N=58), solifenacin (N=252) or tolterodine (N=212)."( Use of health care resources and associated costs in non-institutionalized vulnerable elders with overactive bladder treated with antimuscarinic agents in the usual medical practice.
Aguado-Jodar, A; Navarro-Artieda, R; Rejas-Gutiérrez, J; Ruíz-Torrejón, A; Sicras-Mainar, A, 2014
)
0.76

Toxicity

Fesoterodine was well tolerated, with common adverse events such as headache and dry mouth recognized as antimuscarinic class effects. Incidence of treatment-related adverse events with fesoteradine was similar in women with hypertension (39%)

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Fesoterodine was well tolerated, with common adverse events such as headache and dry mouth recognized as antimuscarinic class effects."( Influence of age, gender, and race on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of fesoterodine.
Malhotra, BK; Sachse, R; Wood, N, 2009
)
1.49
" Safety and tolerability were evaluated via discontinuations, fesoterodine exposure, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and subject-reported treatment tolerance."( Long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of fesoterodine treatment in subjects with overactive bladder symptoms.
Berriman, S; Carlsson, M; Guan, Z; Heesakkers, J; Padmanabhan Aiyer, L; Van Kerrebroeck, PE, 2010
)
0.86
" Dry mouth was the most common treatment-emergent adverse event (men, 24%; women, 32%), rates of discontinuation due to dry mouth were low (men, 1%; women, 2%)."( Long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of fesoterodine treatment in men and women with overactive bladder symptoms.
Bavendam, T; Berriman, S; Carlsson, M; Kelleher, CJ; Sand, PK; Scarpero, H, 2011
)
0.62
" Dry mouth, the most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse event, was lowest among subjects aged ≥75 years (age <45 years, 31%; 45-64 years, 30%; 65-74 years, 32%; ≥75 years, 26%)."( Long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of fesoterodine in subjects with overactive bladder symptoms stratified by age: pooled analysis of two open-label extension studies.
Berriman, S; Carlsson, M; Guan, Z; Heesakkers, J; Kraus, SR; Sand, PK, 2012
)
0.64
" Smaller improvements in micturition frequency and worse bladder-related problems at week 4 were significantly associated with increased likelihood of dose escalation; baseline micturition frequency, age, sex, body mass index, antimuscarinic-associated adverse events and OAB symptom duration were not."( Safety and efficacy of flexible-dose fesoterodine in British subjects with overactive bladder: insights into factors associated with dose escalation.
Cardozo, L; Darekar, A; Ebel Bitoun, C; Hall, T; Kausar, I; Ryan, J; Wagg, A, 2012
)
0.65
" The AMs used to treat OAB differ in their pharmacological profiles, which may affect their potential for causing adverse effects (AEs)."( Pharmacokinetics and toxicity of antimuscarinic drugs for overactive bladder treatment in females.
Alessandri, F; Candiani, M; Ferrero, S; Leone Roberti Maggiore, U; Origoni, M; Remorgida, V; Salvatore, S; Venturini, PL, 2012
)
0.38
" Discontinuations and adverse events (AEs) were monitored, and patients completed 3-day bladder diaries and patient-reported outcomes at the beginning and end of the 12-week OL phase."( Long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of flexible-dose fesoterodine in elderly patients with overactive bladder: open-label extension of the SOFIA trial.
Bitoun, CE; Darekar, A; Khullar, V; Michel, MC; Oelke, M; Wagg, A, 2014
)
0.64
" Safety was assessed by the measurement of postvoid residual volume and adverse event monitoring; if necessary, women underwent a specialist evaluation."( Long-term efficacy and safety of questionnaire-based initiation of urgency urinary incontinence treatment.
Arya, LA; Barrett-Connor, E; Bradley, CS; Brown, JS; Ghetti, CC; Gregory, WT; Hess, R; Huang, AJ; Johnson, KC; Kraus, SR; Pinkerton, JV; Richter, HE; Rogers, RG; Schembri, M; Subak, LL; Sung, VW, 2013
)
0.39
" Twenty-six women experienced 28 serious adverse events, 1 of which was considered possibly treatment related."( Long-term efficacy and safety of questionnaire-based initiation of urgency urinary incontinence treatment.
Arya, LA; Barrett-Connor, E; Bradley, CS; Brown, JS; Ghetti, CC; Gregory, WT; Hess, R; Huang, AJ; Johnson, KC; Kraus, SR; Pinkerton, JV; Richter, HE; Rogers, RG; Schembri, M; Subak, LL; Sung, VW, 2013
)
0.39
"Using a simple validated questionnaire to diagnose and initiate treatment for UUI in community-dwelling women is safe and effective, allowing timely treatment by primary care practitioners."( Long-term efficacy and safety of questionnaire-based initiation of urgency urinary incontinence treatment.
Arya, LA; Barrett-Connor, E; Bradley, CS; Brown, JS; Ghetti, CC; Gregory, WT; Hess, R; Huang, AJ; Johnson, KC; Kraus, SR; Pinkerton, JV; Richter, HE; Rogers, RG; Schembri, M; Subak, LL; Sung, VW, 2013
)
0.39
"9%, 12/308) were the most frequent adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of fesoterodine 8 mg in subjects with overactive bladder after a suboptimal response to tolterodine ER.
Arumi, D; Cardozo, L; Carlsson, M; Crook, TJ; Grenabo, L; Herschorn, S; Kaplan, SA; Ntanios, F; Scholfield, D; Whelan, L, 2014
)
0.71
" The most common adverse events during fesoterodine treatment are dry mouth and constipation."( Fesoterodine clinical efficacy and safety for the treatment of overactive bladder in relation to patient profiles: a systematic review.
Arumi, D; Chapple, C; Kaplan, SA; Oelke, M; Scholfield, D; Wagg, AS, 2015
)
2.13
" Safety was assessed based upon the reporting of adverse events (AEs)."( Safety and efficacy of fesoterodine fumarate in patients with overactive bladder: results of a post-marketing surveillance study in Korea.
Kim, TH; Lee, HE; Lee, KS; Lee, SE, 2016
)
0.74
" This study examined efficacy and safety information from patients >65 in fesoterodine trials to reaffirm efficacy and to explore the relationships between treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs), coexisting medication and co-morbidity."( A pooled analysis of the efficacy of fesoterodine for the treatment of overactive bladder, and the relationship between safety, co-morbidity and polypharmacy in patients aged 65 years or older.
Angulo Cuesta, J; Arumi, D; Carlsson, M; Haab, F; Herschorn, S; Ntanios, F; Oelke, M; Wagg, A, 2017
)
0.96
" The number of concomitant conditions had the greatest influence on the likelihood of an adverse event being reported."( A pooled analysis of the efficacy of fesoterodine for the treatment of overactive bladder, and the relationship between safety, co-morbidity and polypharmacy in patients aged 65 years or older.
Angulo Cuesta, J; Arumi, D; Carlsson, M; Haab, F; Herschorn, S; Ntanios, F; Oelke, M; Wagg, A, 2017
)
0.73
" Incidence of treatment-related adverse events with fesoterodine was similar in women with hypertension (39."( Efficacy and safety of fesoterodine treatment for overactive bladder symptoms in elderly women with and without hypertension.
Hiro, S; Hotta, S; Yamagami, H; Yokoyama, O; Yoshida, M, 2018
)
1.04
" The OAB symptom score (OABSS), Vaginal Health Index Scale (VHIS), and occurrence of adverse effects were examined prior to and at 1 year following treatment initiation."( Efficacy and safety of non-ablative vaginal erbium:YAG laser treatment as a novel surgical treatment for overactive bladder syndrome: comparison with anticholinergics and β3-adrenoceptor agonists.
Okui, N, 2019
)
0.51
" Regarding safety, no adverse events were observed in the VEL group."( Efficacy and safety of non-ablative vaginal erbium:YAG laser treatment as a novel surgical treatment for overactive bladder syndrome: comparison with anticholinergics and β3-adrenoceptor agonists.
Okui, N, 2019
)
0.51
"Cumulative exposure to one or more anticholinergic medications ("anticholinergic burden") is associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes, particularly among older individuals."( Comparative Safety and Efficacy of Treatments for Overactive Bladder Among Older Adults: A Network Meta-analysis.
Hairston, JC; Harrigan, S; Johnston, K; Kristy, RM; Lozano-Ortega, G; Mickle, A; Rogula, B; Schermer, CR; Walker, DR, 2020
)
0.56
" In this older population, mirabegron was associated with a similar odds of experiencing adverse event-related treatment discontinuations relative to placebo (0."( Comparative Safety and Efficacy of Treatments for Overactive Bladder Among Older Adults: A Network Meta-analysis.
Hairston, JC; Harrigan, S; Johnston, K; Kristy, RM; Lozano-Ortega, G; Mickle, A; Rogula, B; Schermer, CR; Walker, DR, 2020
)
0.56
" Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were reported according to response in urinary urgency episodes (UUE)."( What are the chances of improvement or cure from overactive bladder? A pooled responder analysis of efficacy and treatment emergent adverse events following treatment with fesoterodine.
Carlsson, M; Fernet, M; Herschorn, S; Oelke, M; Wagg, AS, 2021
)
0.82
"The aim of this network meta-analysis was to determine the most efficacious oral antimuscarinic or β-adrenoceptor agonist accounting for adverse events for the management of IOAB."( Choosing the Most Efficacious and Safe Oral Treatment for Idiopathic Overactive Bladder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
Aydh, A; Carlin, GL; Grossmann, NC; Hajebrahimi, S; Jilch, S; Katayama, S; König, F; Laukhtina, E; Mori, K; Mostafaei, H; Pradere, B; Quhal, F; Rajwa, P; Roehrborn, CG; Salehi-Pourmehr, H; Sari Motlagh, R; Schuettfort, VM; Shariat, SF, 2022
)
0.72
" Gastrointestinal problems, especially due to antimuscarinic agents, were the most prevalent adverse events."( Choosing the Most Efficacious and Safe Oral Treatment for Idiopathic Overactive Bladder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
Aydh, A; Carlin, GL; Grossmann, NC; Hajebrahimi, S; Jilch, S; Katayama, S; König, F; Laukhtina, E; Mori, K; Mostafaei, H; Pradere, B; Quhal, F; Rajwa, P; Roehrborn, CG; Salehi-Pourmehr, H; Sari Motlagh, R; Schuettfort, VM; Shariat, SF, 2022
)
0.72
" Although finding the best medication for all is impossible, finding the best treatment for every individual patient can be done by considering the efficacy of a medicine for the most bothersome symptom(s) in balance with drug-specific adverse events."( Choosing the Most Efficacious and Safe Oral Treatment for Idiopathic Overactive Bladder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
Aydh, A; Carlin, GL; Grossmann, NC; Hajebrahimi, S; Jilch, S; Katayama, S; König, F; Laukhtina, E; Mori, K; Mostafaei, H; Pradere, B; Quhal, F; Rajwa, P; Roehrborn, CG; Salehi-Pourmehr, H; Sari Motlagh, R; Schuettfort, VM; Shariat, SF, 2022
)
0.72
"This study aimed to find the most efficient oral medication to treat overactive bladder, taking into consideration the adverse events."( Choosing the Most Efficacious and Safe Oral Treatment for Idiopathic Overactive Bladder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
Aydh, A; Carlin, GL; Grossmann, NC; Hajebrahimi, S; Jilch, S; Katayama, S; König, F; Laukhtina, E; Mori, K; Mostafaei, H; Pradere, B; Quhal, F; Rajwa, P; Roehrborn, CG; Salehi-Pourmehr, H; Sari Motlagh, R; Schuettfort, VM; Shariat, SF, 2022
)
0.72
" Aim of our study was to analyze real-life data of adverse events related to AMs and B3A reported on Eudra-Vigilance (EV) Database."( Adverse events related to antimuscarinics and beta-3-agonist: "real-life" data from the Eudra-Vigilance Database.
Cicione, A; DE Nunzio, C; DI Giacomo, F; Disabato, G; Franco, A; Gallo, G; Gravina, C; Lombardo, R; Nacchia, A; Rovesti, L; Trucchi, A; Tubaro, A; Turchi, B, 2022
)
0.72
"EV database is the system for managing and analyzing information on suspected adverse reactions to medicines which have been authorized or being studied in clinical trials in the European Economic Area (EEA)."( Adverse events related to antimuscarinics and beta-3-agonist: "real-life" data from the Eudra-Vigilance Database.
Cicione, A; DE Nunzio, C; DI Giacomo, F; Disabato, G; Franco, A; Gallo, G; Gravina, C; Lombardo, R; Nacchia, A; Rovesti, L; Trucchi, A; Tubaro, A; Turchi, B, 2022
)
0.72

Pharmacokinetics

Fesoterodine demonstrated a pharmacokinetic (PK) profile that was favorable for once-daily dosing. Tolterodine, and not 5-HMT, was the principal source of variability.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The mean Cmax and AUC0-t in PMs were approximately twice those observed in EMs."( Pharmacokinetic profile of fesoterodine.
Gandelman, K; Guan, Z; Malhotra, B; Wood, N, 2008
)
0.64
"Fesoterodine demonstrated a pharmacokinetic (PK) profile that was favorable for once-daily dosing."( Pharmacokinetic profile of fesoterodine.
Gandelman, K; Guan, Z; Malhotra, B; Wood, N, 2008
)
2.09
" The objective of this study was to establish the pharmacokinetic profile of fesoterodine and to highlight ist potential pharmacokinetic advantages over tolterodine."( The pharmacokinetic profile of fesoterodine: similarities and differences to tolterodine.
Malhotra, B; Simon, HU, 2009
)
0.87
" Blood and urine samples for the analysis of 5-HMT were collected before and multiple times after drug administration for pharmacokinetic analysis."( The pharmacokinetic profile of fesoterodine: similarities and differences to tolterodine.
Malhotra, B; Simon, HU, 2009
)
0.64
"The mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of 5-HMT and the mean area under the time versus concentration curve (AUC) increased proportionally with the fesoterodine dose."( The pharmacokinetic profile of fesoterodine: similarities and differences to tolterodine.
Malhotra, B; Simon, HU, 2009
)
0.84
" The median time of observed maximum drug concentration (5-6 hours) and mean terminal half-life (6-7 hours) of 5-HMT are unaffected by renal impairment."( Assessment of the effects of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetic profile of fesoterodine.
Gandelman, K; Malhotra, B; Sachse, R; Wood, N, 2009
)
0.58
" time to maximum plasma concentration terminal elimination half-life and mean residence time), did not differ markedly between the fed and fasted states."( Influence of food on the pharmacokinetic profile of fesoterodine.
Malhotra, B; Sachse, R; Wood, N, 2009
)
0.6
" Pharmacodynamic variables included spontaneous salivary secretion (Studies 1 and 2) and residual urine volume (Study 2 only)."( Influence of age, gender, and race on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of fesoterodine.
Malhotra, BK; Sachse, R; Wood, N, 2009
)
0.58
"This head-to-head study confirmed the findings of reduced pharmacokinetic variability of fesoterodine and further delineates that tolterodine, and not 5-HMT, was the principal source of variability after administration of tolterodine extended release."( Comparison of pharmacokinetic variability of fesoterodine vs. tolterodine extended release in cytochrome P450 2D6 extensive and poor metabolizers.
Crownover, P; Darsey, E; Fang, J; Glue, P; Malhotra, B, 2011
)
0.85
" Pharmacokinetic endpoints were area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC(0,∞)), maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), AUC from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC(0,last)), time to C(max) (t(max) ), and half-life (t(1/2)) for S- and R-warfarin."( Effects of fesoterodine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy volunteers.
Alvey, C; Duczynski, G; Gandelman, K; Gong, J; Li, X; Malhotra, B, 2011
)
0.76
"Across all pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparisons, the point estimates of treatment ratio (warfarin co-administered with fesoterodine vs."( Effects of fesoterodine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy volunteers.
Alvey, C; Duczynski, G; Gandelman, K; Gong, J; Li, X; Malhotra, B, 2011
)
0.96
" PK endpoints, including the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity (AUC(0,∞)), maximum plasma concentration (C(max) ), time to C(max) (t(max) ), and half-life (t(1/2) ), were assessed for 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine (5-HMT), the active moiety of fesoterodine."( Effects of the moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor, fluconazole, on the pharmacokinetics of fesoterodine in healthy subjects.
Alvey, C; Dickins, M; Duczynski, G; Gandelman, K; Jumadilova, Z; Li, X; Malhotra, B, 2011
)
0.77
" This study aimed to evaluate the safety profile and pharmacokinetic characteristics of multiple oral doses of sustained-release fesoterodine (fesoterodine SR) in healthy Korean males."( Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of fesoterodine sustained-release in healthy Korean volunteers.
Cho, JY; Jang, IJ; Lee, S; Lim, KS; Shin, D; Shin, KH; Shin, SG; Yu, KS, 2012
)
0.86
" The CYP2D6 genotype was analyzed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods to assess the effect of genetic polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetic parameters."( Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of fesoterodine sustained-release in healthy Korean volunteers.
Cho, JY; Jang, IJ; Lee, S; Lim, KS; Shin, D; Shin, KH; Shin, SG; Yu, KS, 2012
)
0.66
" The mean AUCτ and Cmax of 5-HMT increased in approximately the same proportion as the dose increased."( Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of fesoterodine sustained-release in healthy Korean volunteers.
Cho, JY; Jang, IJ; Lee, S; Lim, KS; Shin, D; Shin, KH; Shin, SG; Yu, KS, 2012
)
0.66
" Ten pharmacokinetic studies and three efficacy/safety studies in overactive bladder (OAB) patients were pooled for the population pharmacokinetic analysis."( Population pharmacokinetics of the 5-hydroxymethyl metabolite of tolterodine after administration of fesoterodine sustained release tablet in Western and East Asian populations.
Malhotra, B; Oishi, M; Tomono, Y; Yamagami, H, 2014
)
0.62
" Potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) following coadministration of these 2 overactive bladder treatments were estimated using physiologically based pharmacokinetic models, developed and verified by comparing predicted and observed pharmacokinetic profiles from clinical studies."( Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling Suggests Limited Drug-Drug Interaction for Fesoterodine When Coadministered With Mirabegron.
Goosen, TC; Lin, J; Malhotra, B; Tse, S; Yamagami, H, 2019
)
0.74
"A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and a lag time, which included the effects of body weight, sex, cytochrome (CYP) 2D6 metabolizer status and fesoterodine formulation on pharmacokinetic parameters, best described the 5-HMT pharmacokinetics."( Population Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Fesoterodine in Pediatric Patients with Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity.
Darekar, A; Malhotra, BK; Sano, Y; Shahin, M; Shoji, S; Sweeney, K, 2023
)
1.35
" Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models were developed for 5-HMT based on data from two pediatric clinical trials that included 142 patients of age ≥ 6 years with OAB or NDO."( Population Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Fesoterodine in Pediatric Patients with Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity.
Darekar, A; Malhotra, BK; Sano, Y; Shahin, M; Shoji, S; Sweeney, K, 2023
)
1.15

Compound-Compound Interactions

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"To assess drug-drug interactions of fesoterodine with cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibitor (ketoconazole), inducer (rifampicin), and substrates (ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel)."( Evaluation of drug-drug interactions with fesoterodine.
Malhotra, B; Sachse, R; Wood, N, 2009
)
0.89
" Potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) following coadministration of these 2 overactive bladder treatments were estimated using physiologically based pharmacokinetic models, developed and verified by comparing predicted and observed pharmacokinetic profiles from clinical studies."( Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling Suggests Limited Drug-Drug Interaction for Fesoterodine When Coadministered With Mirabegron.
Goosen, TC; Lin, J; Malhotra, B; Tse, S; Yamagami, H, 2019
)
0.74

Bioavailability

Fesoterodine delivers 5-HMT consistently, regardless of CYP2D6 status, with up to 40% higher bioavailability compared with tolterodine.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" A prodrug approach was necessary for systemic bioavailability of 5-HMT after oral administration."( The design and development of fesoterodine as a prodrug of 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine (5-HMT), the active metabolite of tolterodine.
Gandelman, K; Malhotra, B; Michel, MC; Sachse, R; Wood, N, 2009
)
0.64
" We estimated the relative bioavailability of 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine (5-HMT), the active metabolite of fesoterodine, following nighttime and daytime administration."( The pharmacokinetic profile of fesoterodine 8 mg with daytime or nighttime dosing.
Crownover, PH; Glue, P; LaBadie, R; MacDiarmid, SA; Malhotra, BK, 2010
)
0.86
" The data suggest that fesoterodine delivers 5-HMT consistently, regardless of CYP2D6 status, with up to 40% higher bioavailability compared with tolterodine."( Comparison of pharmacokinetic variability of fesoterodine vs. tolterodine extended release in cytochrome P450 2D6 extensive and poor metabolizers.
Crownover, P; Darsey, E; Fang, J; Glue, P; Malhotra, B, 2011
)
0.94
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51
" (Wilczek)] is considered as an extremely nutritious crop possessing a high level of micronutrients, but their low bioavailability in the crop leads to micronutrient malnutrition in humans."( Biofortification of mungbean (Vigna radiata L. (Wilczek)) with boron, zinc and iron alters its grain yield and nutrition.
Barek, V; Dhaliwal, SS; Gaber, A; Hossain, A; Kaur, J; Kaur, M; Sharma, V; Shukla, AK; Singh, P; Verma, V, 2023
)
0.91
"Nanostructured iron(III) compounds are promising food fortificants with desirable iron bioavailability and food compatibility."( Gum Arabic-Stabilized Ferric Oxyhydroxide Nanoparticles for Efficient and Targeted Intestinal Delivery of Bioavailable Iron.
Gang, Y; Guo, W; Li, S; Wu, H; Xing, W; Zeng, M, 2023
)
0.91

Dosage Studied

The study was a randomized, open-label, two-period, two treatment crossover, single-dose study. Subjects received fesoterodine 4 mg once daily for 4 weeks; thereafter, daily dosage was maintained at 4 mg or increased to 8 mg based on the subject's and physician's subjective assessment of efficacy and tolerability.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"05) except micturition frequency, demonstrating a dose-response relationship."( Fesoterodine dose response in subjects with overactive bladder syndrome.
Dmochowski, R; Guan, Z; Khullar, V; Nitti, V; Rovner, ES; Wang, J, 2008
)
1.79
" Therefore, in contrast to tolterodine, no reduction of fesoterodine dosage is required under conditions of reduced elimination."( The pharmacokinetic profile of fesoterodine: similarities and differences to tolterodine.
Malhotra, B; Simon, HU, 2009
)
0.89
"Fesoterodine dosage should not exceed 4 mg once daily when taken concomitantly with potent CYP3A4 inhibitors."( Evaluation of drug-drug interactions with fesoterodine.
Malhotra, B; Sachse, R; Wood, N, 2009
)
2.06
" Subjects received fesoterodine 4 mg once daily for 4 weeks; thereafter, daily dosage was maintained at 4 mg or increased to 8 mg based on the subject's and physician's subjective assessment of efficacy and tolerability."( Effects of flexible-dose fesoterodine on overactive bladder symptoms and treatment satisfaction: an open-label study.
Choo, MS; Goldfischer, ER; Gong, J; Guan, Z; Morrow, JD; Tseng, LJ; Wyndaele, JJ, 2009
)
0.98
"Subject demographics, such as age, gender, and race, do not have a clinically meaningful effect on 5-HMT pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics after single-dose administration of fesoterodine 8 mg; thus, no dosage adjustment is required for fesoterodine based on age, gender, or race."( Influence of age, gender, and race on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of fesoterodine.
Malhotra, BK; Sachse, R; Wood, N, 2009
)
0.77
" At least partially due to the avoidance of variations in pharmacokinetic exposures observed with tolterodine, it was possible to develop fesoterodine with the flexibility of two efficacious and well-tolerated dosage regimens of 4 and 8 mg daily."( The design and development of fesoterodine as a prodrug of 5-hydroxymethyl tolterodine (5-HMT), the active metabolite of tolterodine.
Gandelman, K; Malhotra, B; Michel, MC; Sachse, R; Wood, N, 2009
)
0.84
"Overall, there were linear dose-response relationships for placebo and the fesoterodine groups for the reduction in the number of voids/24 h and UUI episodes/week."( Response to fesoterodine in patients with an overactive bladder and urgency urinary incontinence is independent of the urodynamic finding of detrusor overactivity.
Bavendam, T; Nitti, VW; Rovner, ES, 2010
)
0.97
"In this randomized, open-label, two-period, two-treatment crossover, single-dose study, healthy subjects received daytime and nighttime oral dosing of fesoterodine 8-mg sustained-release tablets, separated by a minimum 60-h washout period."( The pharmacokinetic profile of fesoterodine 8 mg with daytime or nighttime dosing.
Crownover, PH; Glue, P; LaBadie, R; MacDiarmid, SA; Malhotra, BK, 2010
)
0.85
" The 21% reduction in the C(max) for nighttime dosing is unlikely to be clinically relevant."( The pharmacokinetic profile of fesoterodine 8 mg with daytime or nighttime dosing.
Crownover, PH; Glue, P; LaBadie, R; MacDiarmid, SA; Malhotra, BK, 2010
)
0.65
"Data from subjects enrolled in double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II and III trials were used for developing longitudinal dose-response models."( Modeling dose-response relationships of the effects of fesoterodine in patients with overactive bladder.
Cardozo, L; El-Tahtawy, A; Guan, Z; Khullar, V; Malhotra, B; Staskin, D, 2010
)
0.61
" The dose-response models can be used to predict outcomes for doses not studied or for patient subgroups underrepresented in clinical trials."( Modeling dose-response relationships of the effects of fesoterodine in patients with overactive bladder.
Cardozo, L; El-Tahtawy, A; Guan, Z; Khullar, V; Malhotra, B; Staskin, D, 2010
)
0.61
" Based on the results, a drug degradation pathway was proposed, and the validated LC method was successfully applied to the quantitative analysis of fesoterodine in tablet dosage forms, helping to improve quality control and to assure therapeutic efficacy."( Fesoterodine stress degradation behavior by liquid chromatography coupled to ultraviolet detection and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.
Sangoi, MS; Steppe, M; Todeschini, V, 2011
)
2.01
"Available data suggest that fesoterodine dosage should not exceed 4 mg once daily when taken concomitantly with potent CYP3A4 inhibitors, such as ketoconazole."( Effects of the moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor, fluconazole, on the pharmacokinetics of fesoterodine in healthy subjects.
Alvey, C; Dickins, M; Duczynski, G; Gandelman, K; Jumadilova, Z; Li, X; Malhotra, B, 2011
)
0.89
"It is concluded that fesoterodine has the added advantage of flexible dosing over some other antimuscarinics."( Review of fesoterodine.
Cardozo, L; Vella, M, 2011
)
1.09
" Its once-daily dosing regime and the flexibility to increase the dose are appealing factors."( Fesoterodine in randomised clinical trials: an updated systematic clinical review of efficacy and safety.
Bhide, A; Dell'Utri, C; Digesu, GA; Khullar, V, 2012
)
1.82
" The mean (SD) areas under the plasma concentration-time curves during the dosing interval (AUCτ) of the 4 mg and 8 mg dose groups were 26."( Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of fesoterodine sustained-release in healthy Korean volunteers.
Cho, JY; Jang, IJ; Lee, S; Lim, KS; Shin, D; Shin, KH; Shin, SG; Yu, KS, 2012
)
0.66
"Participants were randomized to fesoterodine or placebo for 12 weeks, with stratification according to age (>75 vs ≤ 75) and dosing time (morning vs evening)."( Flexible-dose fesoterodine in elderly adults with overactive bladder: results of the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of fesoterodine in an aging population trial.
Bitoun, CE; Darekar, A; Khullar, V; Marschall-Kehrel, D; Michel, MC; Oelke, M; Osterloh, I; Wagg, A; Weinstein, D, 2013
)
1.03
"Data from flexible-dose studies provide strong evidence that fesoterodine provides treatment benefit to individual subjects with OAB because of its true dose-response effect."( Flexible dosing with fesoterodine 4 and 8 mg: a systematic review of data from clinical trials.
Arumi, D; MacDiarmid, S; Schneider, T; Scholfield, D; Wyndaele, JJ, 2014
)
0.96
"0% changed the dosage (84."( Profile of oab patient on treatment with flexible-dose antimuscarinic drugs in daily clinical practice.
Arumi, D; García-Mediero, JM; Lizarraga, I; Sánchez-Ballester, F; Sobrón-Bustamante, M, 2016
)
0.43
" We also found that increasing value of total payment and increasing frequency of payments were both independently associated with increased odds of prescribing with a dose-response effect."( The Receipt of Industry Payments is Associated With Prescribing Promoted Alpha-blockers and Overactive Bladder Medications.
Chang, SL; Dupree, JM; Kirk, PS; Modi, PK; Singer, EA; Wang, Y, 2018
)
0.48
"Fesoterodine at a dosage of 4 mg for 12 weeks reduced the severity of symptoms of AD in patients with SCI and NBD, which was manifested by the stabilization of blood pressure and a decrease in the number of episodes of AD, which significantly improved the quality of life."( [Efficacy of fesoterodine for prevention of autonomic dysreflexia in patients with neurogenic dysfunction of the bladder after spinal cord injury].
Chalyi, ME; Frolova, MV; Kamalov, AA; Okhobotov, DA; Salyukov, RV, 2023
)
2.72
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Drug Classes (1)

ClassDescription
diarylmethaneAny compound containing two aryl groups connected by a single C atom.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Protein Targets (2)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
EWS/FLI fusion proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency33.17340.001310.157742.8575AID1259256
Spike glycoproteinSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusPotency29.49640.009610.525035.4813AID1479145; AID1479148
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Ceullar Components (1)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
virion membraneSpike glycoproteinSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (33)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1347160Primary screen NINDS Rhodamine qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347159Primary screen GU Rhodamine qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors: Unlinked NS2B-NS3 protease assay2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347097qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347154Primary screen GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347091qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347086qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Arenaviruses (LCMV): LCMV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347102qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347101qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347083qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: Viability assay - alamar blue signal for LASV Primary Screen2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347095qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347082qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: LASV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347103qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347098qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347107qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347094qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1347093qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1508630Primary qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome: Secreted ER Calcium Modulated Protein (SERCaMP) assay2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID1347106qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347090qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347105qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347108qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347100qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347092qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for A673 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347104qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347099qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347096qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347089qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1474167Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring verified drug-induced liver injury concern status2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID1474166Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring severity class index2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (199)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's24 (12.06)29.6817
2010's143 (71.86)24.3611
2020's32 (16.08)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 75.31

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index75.31 (24.57)
Research Supply Index5.65 (2.92)
Research Growth Index4.99 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index130.57 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (75.31)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials79 (38.73%)5.53%
Reviews32 (15.69%)6.00%
Case Studies0 (0.00%)4.05%
Observational6 (2.94%)0.25%
Other87 (42.65%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (66)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Prevention of Fall in Older Adults With Overactive Bladdar [NCT03946124]Phase 474 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-25Completed
Treatment Persistence Among Patients With Overactive Bladder: A Retrospective Secondary Data Analysis in Asia Oceania [NCT03602508]5,589 participants (Actual)Observational2018-07-20Completed
A Novel Stable Iron Isotope Method to Define Iron Needs and Improve Iron Nutrition in HIV+ and HIV- Children [NCT03572010]180 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-27Completed
Open-label, Single-dose, Randomized, Crossover Study To Estimate The Relative Bioavailability Compared To Commercial Extended-release Tablet Formulation And The Effects Of Food Or Sprinkling On Applesauce For Fesoterodine Sustained-release Beads-in-capsul [NCT02160158]Phase 124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-07-31Completed
Randomized Cross-Over Study of Fesoterodine on Urgency Episodes in Parkinson's Disease Population [NCT02385500]Phase 45 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Insufficient or untimely patient recruitment)
The Effect of Apo- and Holo-Lactoferrin and Dosing Regimen on Iron Absorption From a Maize-based Porridge in Kenyan Infants [NCT03617575]25 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-12-11Completed
Efficacy and Tolerability of Fesoterodine and Oxybutynin XL for Overactive Bladder Syndrome in Children: a Comparative Study. [NCT02327936]Phase 362 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
Comparative Urine Proteomic Studies of Overactive Bladder in Humans [NCT01367886]21 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
A Randomized Double-blinded Trial Comparing DEsmopressin to FEsoterodine in the Treatment of Severe Nocturia in Women Aged 65 and olDer: The DEFEND Trial [NCT02262936]Phase 2/Phase 34 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Poor recruitment)
A 12-Week, Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study To Evaluate The Effects Of Fesoterodine On Treatment Satisfaction And Symptom Relief In Overactive Bladder Patients. [NCT00425100]Phase 3516 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
A 14 Week Randomized Parallel Group Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Multicentre Study Of Fesoterodine 8 Mg In Overactive Bladder Patients With Sub-Optimal Response To Tolterodine 4 Mg Extended Release (ER). [NCT01302054]Phase 4990 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
A PHASE 1, OPEN-LABEL, SINGLE-DOSE, CROSSOVER STUDY TO ASSESS THE BIOEQUIVALENCE UNDER FED AND FASTED CONDITIONS OF FESOTERODINE BEADS-IN-CAPSULE SR7 AND SR4 FORMULATIONS, THE EFFECT OF FOOD ON THE PHARMACOKINETICS OF THE BEADS-IN-CAPSULE SR7 FORMULATION [NCT04452838]Phase 137 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-06-26Completed
The Effect of Encapsulation Material and Encapsulated Micronutrients on Iron Absorption in Iron Depleted Women Consuming Iron Fortified Bread. [NCT03332602]24 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-04Completed
A Local, Multicentre, Open-Label, Extension Trial To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Fesoterodine Flexible Dose Regimen In Elderly Patients With Overactive Bladder [NCT01054222]Phase 431 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
Observational Study In Patients With Overactive Bladder (OAB) Treated With Toviaz® After Failure Of Previous Antimuscarinic Therapy Due To Ineffectivity Or Intolerance. [NCT00691093]823 participants (Actual)Observational2008-07-31Completed
A 12-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Trial To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Fesoterodine Flexible Dose Regimen In Vulnerable Elderly Patients With Overactive Bladder. [NCT00928070]Phase 4566 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
Evaluating the Effect of Polyphenols on the Iron Bioavailability From Iron Chlorophyllin in Young Women Using the Iron Stable Isotopic Method [NCT04849832]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-06-21Completed
A Prospective, Non-interventional, Registry Study of Patients Initiating Pharmacologic Therapy for Overactive Bladder in Taiwan, Korea and China [NCT03572231]805 participants (Actual)Observational2018-07-19Completed
Inflammation in Women With Urgency Urinary Incontinence Treated With Anticholinergics [NCT04090190]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-30Completed
Neuropathic Investigation and Anticholinergic Treatment of Bladder Dysfunction in Diabetes and Stroke Patients [NCT00713921]Early Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-15Withdrawn(stopped due to Lack of enrollment and loss of funding)
A 12-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Trial To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of A Fesoterodine Flexible Dose Regimen In Patients With Overactive Bladder. [NCT00536484]Phase 3896 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
An Open-Label, Randomized, Two-Way Crossover Study To Evaluate The Steady-State Effect Of Fesoterodine On The Pharmacokinetics And Pharmacodynamics Of A Single Supratherapeutic Dose Of Warfarin In Healthy Subjects. [NCT00914667]Phase 114 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
An Open-Label, Randomized, Two-Way Crossover Study To Evaluate The Effect Of Fluconazole, A Moderate CYP3A4 Inhibitor, On The Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics Of Fesoterodine In Healthy Subjects. [NCT00911235]Phase 128 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
"A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Fesoterodine As An Add-On Therapy In Men With Persistent Overactive Bladder Symptoms Under Monotherapy Of Alpha Blocker For Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms." [NCT00546637]Phase 3947 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
An Open-Label, Randomized, Single-Dose, Two-Way Crossover Bioequivalence Study Of 8 Mg Fesoterodine Extended-Release Tablets (Toviaz™), Manufactured At Zwickau Versus Vega Baja, In Healthy Subjects. [NCT00902681]Phase 136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Post Marketing Surveillance Study To Observe Safety And Efficacy Of Toviaz (Registered) [NCT00879398]3,000 participants (Actual)Observational2009-11-30Completed
A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group, Multiple Dose Study To Investigate The Effects Of 8 Mg Fesoterodine SR Tablets And 10 Mg Solifenacin Tablet On Gastrointestinal Transit In Healthy Female Subjects. [NCT00832650]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Protocol A0221057 was terminated on December 25, 2009 for futility. There were no safety concerns related to this decision.)
A 24-Week, Multi-Centre Trial, Comprising A 12-Week, Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Phase Followed By A 12-Week Open-Label Phase, To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of A Fesoterodine Flexible Dose Regimen In Elderly Patients [NCT00798434]Phase 4794 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
An Open-Label, Multicenter, Long Term Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Fesoterodine in Patients With Overactive Bladder. [NCT00658684]Phase 3153 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
A Phase 1, Open-Label, Randomized, Single-Dose, 2-Cohort, 3-Way Crossover Study To Determine Bioequivalence Of 4 Mg And 8 Mg Fesoterodine SR Tablet Of Commercial Formulation And 8 Mg Fesoterodine SR Tablet Between Formulation E(1) And Formulation F And In [NCT00807118]Phase 1108 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
12-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy,Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Trial To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Fesoterodine In Comparison To Tolterodine ER In Patients With Overactive Bladder (OAB) [NCT00444925]Phase 31,712 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
12-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Trial To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Fesoterodine In Comparison To Tolterodine ER In Patients With Overactive Bladder. [NCT00611026]Phase 32,417 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Dose, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Study Of The Efficacy Of Fesoterodine In Increasing Urethral Pressure In Stress Urinary Incontinence Patients. [NCT01042236]Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
An Open-Label, Randomized, Single-Dose, Two-Way Crossover Bioequivalence Study Of 4 Mg Fesoterodine Extended-Release Tablets (Toviaz™), Manufactured At Zwickau Versus Vega Baja, In Healthy Subjects. [NCT00902187]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
An Open Label Study to Measure the Efficacy of Fesoterodine (Toviaz) on Continued Detrusor Overactivity in Patients That Have Undergone Treatment for Bladder Outlet Obstruction [NCT00605319]Phase 417 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
An Open-Label, Dose-Escalating Study Of The Pharmacokinetics, Safety And Tolerability Of Fesoterodine In Pediatric Overactive Bladder Patients Aged 8-17 Years. [NCT00857896]Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
A Phase 1, Open-Label, Randomized, Single-Dose, 2-Way Crossover Study To Determine Bioequivalence Of 4 Mg Fesoterodine SR Tablet Between Formulation D And Formulation E(1) In Healthy Subjects. [NCT00786240]Phase 137 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
A 12 Week, Multi-centre, Open Label Study To Evaluate The Efficacy, Tolerability And Safety Of A Fesoterodine Flexible Dose Regimen In Patients With Overactive Bladder. [NCT00806494]Phase 4331 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
The Effect of Ovotransferrin and Lactoferrin on Iron Absorption From Ferrous Sulfate in Adult Women With Non-anemic Iron Deficiency: Stable Isotope Study [NCT05233709]35 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-04-25Completed
Evaluation of Iron Bioavailability From Iron Chlorophyllin in Young Women Using the Iron Stable Isotopic Method [NCT04602247]55 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-26Completed
A 4 Way Placebo And Active Controlled Study To Evaluate The Effects Of Fesoterodine On Cognitive Function In Healthy Elderly Subjects [NCT01161472]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
A 12-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter, Dose-Finding Study To Evaluate The Efficacy, Tolerability And Safety Of Fesoterodine In Comparison To Placebo In Patients With Overactive Bladder. [NCT00561951]Phase 2951 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Efficacy and Tolerability of Fesoterodine for Overactive Bladder Syndrome in Children: an Extension Study. [NCT02614482]Phase 326 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Completed
Facts Study (Fakten-studie): Non-interventional Study to Investigate Whether Information Provided to Patients Influences Satisfaction With Toviaz Therapy As Perceived by the Patient [NCT01091519]781 participants (Actual)Observational2010-12-31Terminated(stopped due to See termination reason in detailed description.)
A Phase II, Open-Label Exploratory Study Investigating the Efficacy of Toviaz for Treatment of Adult Patients With Spinal Cord Injury With Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity for Amelioration of Autonomic Dysreflexia(PIIR-AK-TOVIAZ-AD) [NCT02676154]Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-25Completed
A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group, Multicenter Trial To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of A Fesoterodine Flexible Dose Regimen In Patients With Symptoms Of Overactive Bladder Including Nocturnal Urinary Urgency. [NCT00911937]Phase 4963 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
Phase IV Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety Imidafenacin Versus Fesoterodine in Patients With Overactive Bladder [NCT01578304]Phase 4207 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
Solifenacin Succinate vs. Fesoterodine A Comparison Trial for the Treatment of Bothersome Urgency Symptoms [NCT01595152]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-05-31Recruiting
A 12-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group, Multicenter Trial In Overactive Bladder Subjects To Confirm The Efficacy Of 8 Mg Fesoterodine Compared To 4 Mg Fesoterodine. [NCT01302067]Phase 42,012 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
A Phase IV, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Single-Center Study of the Effects of Fesoterodine in Men at High Risk for Overactive Bladder/Detrusor Overactivity Post Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy ) [NCT01661166]Phase 43 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
An Open-Label, Single-Dose, Randomized, Cross-Over Study To Estimate The Bioavailability And Food Effect Of 4 Mg Fesoterodine Extended Release Beads-In-Capsule Formulations Compared To Commercial Tablet Formulation In Healthy Volunteers [NCT01286454]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
"A 13-Week, Single-Arm, Open-Label, Multicenter Study To Evaluate Refill Adherence And Satisfaction With Fesoterodine Plus Your Way Patient Support Plan In Patients With Symptoms Of Overactive Bladder." [NCT00943735]774 participants (Actual)Observational2009-07-31Completed
Post Marketing Surveillance To Assess The Safety And Efficacy Of Fesoterodine (Toviaz) On Filipino Patients Diagnosed With Over-Active Bladder [NCT01260311]508 participants (Actual)Observational2011-02-28Completed
DRUG USE INVESTIGATION FOR TOVIAZ [NCT01936870]2,521 participants (Actual)Observational2013-10-01Completed
A Multi-center, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Fesoterodine to Placebo in Women Diagnosed With Urge Urinary Incontinence by the 3 Incontinence Questions (3IQ). Followed by a Multi-center Open Label Clinical Cohort Study of Long-te [NCT00862745]Phase 4645 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
Urinary NGF, PGE2 and ATP: Potential Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Prediction of Treatment Efficacy in Overactive Bladder Patients [NCT01499069]191 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
Understanding the Response to Fesoterodine Through Genetic Evaluation in the Elderly [NCT01786967]Phase 361 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
A Double Blind, Randomized Four Way Cross Over Study to Compare the Effect of Fesoterodine 4mg and 8mg Once Daily and Oxybutynin 5mg Twice Daily After Steady State Dosing Versus Placebo on Cognitive Function in Subjects With Overactive Bladder, Over the A [NCT02240459]Phase 247 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-31Completed
Validation of Instruments for Pragmatic Clinical Trials for Overatcive Bladder [NCT01925456]Phase 175 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
Open-Label, Single-Dose, Randomized, Crossover Study To Estimate The Effects Of Food On The Pharmacokinetics Of Two Fesoterodine Sustained-Release Beads-In-Capsule Formulations And To Estimate The Relative Bioavailability Of One Or Both Formulations Compa [NCT01566760]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
Iron Bioavailability From Salt Fortified With Ferrous Sulphate, Zinc Sulphate and Ascorbic Acid Encapsulated in a Polymer Jacket [NCT02353325]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
AN OPEN-LABEL, RANDOMIZED, SINGLE-DOSE, 4 PERIOD, 4 TREATMENT, 2 SEQUENCE, TWO 2 WAY CROSSOVER, BIOEQUIVALENCE STUDY IN HEALTHY PARTICIPANTS COMPARING 4 MG AND 8 MG FESOTERODINE EXTENDED RELEASE TABLETS (TOVIAZ(TM)), MANUFACTURED AT ZWICKAU VERSUS FREIBUR [NCT04478357]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-12Completed
Assessment of the Bioavailability of Iron in Iron Fortified Bouillon Cubes in Healthy Women [NCT02327299]24 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Completed
LONG-TERM EXTENSION STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY OF FESOTERODINE IN JAPANESE PEDIATRIC SUBJECTS WITH SYMPTOMS OF DETRUSOR OVERACTIVITY ASSOCIATED WITH A NEUROLOGICAL CONDITION (NEUROGENIC DETRUSOR OVERACTIVITY) WHO HAVE COMPLETED 24 WEEKS TREATMENT IN STU [NCT02501928]Phase 312 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-05Completed
Prospective Randomized Trial of Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS) Versus PTNS and Fesoterodine Fumarate [NCT01605617]Phase 44 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Low recruitment rate, and study patients were removed prior to completion)
A 24-WEEK RANDOMIZED, OPEN-LABEL, STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF FESOTERODINE IN SUBJECTS AGED 6 TO 17 YEARS WITH SYMPTOMS OF DETRUSOR OVERACTIVITY ASSOCIATED WITH A NEUROLOGICAL CONDITION (NEUROGENIC DETRUSOR OVERACTIVITY) [NCT01557244]Phase 3181 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-02Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00425100 (20) [back to overview]Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) - Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Social Interaction Domain
NCT00425100 (20) [back to overview]"Satisfaction With OAB Control Module of Overactive Bladder (OAB) Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ) (OAB-S)"
NCT00425100 (20) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting Satisfaction With Current Overactive Bladder (OAB) Treatment
NCT00425100 (20) [back to overview]Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) Score at Week 12 Relative to Baseline (Categorical Change)
NCT00425100 (20) [back to overview]Treated Subjects Reporting Satisfaction With Their Current OAB Treatment (Supportive Analysis)
NCT00425100 (20) [back to overview]Mean Number of Micturition Episodes Per 24 Hours
NCT00425100 (20) [back to overview]Mean Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
NCT00425100 (20) [back to overview]Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours
NCT00425100 (20) [back to overview]Mean Rating on the Urinary Sensation Scale
NCT00425100 (20) [back to overview]Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours
NCT00425100 (20) [back to overview]Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) - Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Concern Domain
NCT00425100 (20) [back to overview]Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) - Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Coping Domain
NCT00425100 (20) [back to overview]Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) - Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Sleep Domain
NCT00425100 (20) [back to overview]Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) at Week 12 Relative to Baseline (Categorical Change)
NCT00425100 (20) [back to overview]Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) - Symptom Bother Scale
NCT00425100 (20) [back to overview]Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) - Total Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Scale
NCT00425100 (20) [back to overview]Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) Score
NCT00425100 (20) [back to overview]Severe Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
NCT00425100 (20) [back to overview]Sum Rating on the Urinary Sensation Scale
NCT00425100 (20) [back to overview]Urgency Perception Scale (UPS)
NCT00444925 (19) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline of Severe Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours.
NCT00444925 (19) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours.
NCT00444925 (19) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline of UUI Episodes Per 24 Hours.
NCT00444925 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12 (End of Treatment).
NCT00444925 (19) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline of Micturitions Per 24 Hours.
NCT00444925 (19) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline of Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours.
NCT00444925 (19) [back to overview]Diary Dry Rates
NCT00444925 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q): Symptom Bother Score at Week 12 (End of Treatment).
NCT00444925 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of UUI Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 1 and Week 4.
NCT00444925 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Frequency-Urgency Sum (Formerly Known as Urinary Sensations Scale Sum in Protocol) Per 24 Hours.
NCT00444925 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours.
NCT00444925 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours.
NCT00444925 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Severe Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours.
NCT00444925 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours.
NCT00444925 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean USS Rating Per Micturition Per 24 Hours.
NCT00444925 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Voided Volume Per Micturition.
NCT00444925 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in OAB-q: Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) at Week 12 (End of Treatment).
NCT00444925 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC).
NCT00444925 (19) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Urgency Perception Scale (UPS). UPS Equals Patient Perception of Urgency Scale (PPUS) in Protocol.
NCT00536484 (13) [back to overview]Change in Urgency Severity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Relative to Baseline
NCT00536484 (13) [back to overview]Change in Mean Number of Micturition Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12 Relative to Baseline.
NCT00536484 (13) [back to overview]Change in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12 Relative to Baseline - Symptom Bother Scale
NCT00536484 (13) [back to overview]Categorical Change in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) Score Relative to Baseline
NCT00536484 (13) [back to overview]Categorical Change in Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) Relative to Baseline
NCT00536484 (13) [back to overview]Change in Frequency-urgency Sum Per 24 Hours Relative to Baseline
NCT00536484 (13) [back to overview]Change in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12 Relative to Baseline - Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Subscales
NCT00536484 (13) [back to overview]Change in Mean Number of Micturition Episodes Per 24 Hours Relative to Baseline
NCT00536484 (13) [back to overview]Change in Nocturnal Micturition Episodes Per 24 Hours Relative to Baseline
NCT00536484 (13) [back to overview]Change in Number of Nocturnal Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours Relative to Baseline
NCT00536484 (13) [back to overview]Change in Number of Severe Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours Relative to Baseline
NCT00536484 (13) [back to overview]Change in Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours Relative to Baseline
NCT00536484 (13) [back to overview]Change in Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours Relative to Baseline
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in PPBC Per 24 Hours at Week 12
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) Per 24 Hours at Week 4
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Numerical Change From Baseline in Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events Related to Increased Voiding Difficulty (All Causalities)
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Score of Each Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain of OAB-q at Week 4 and 12
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Score of Each Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain of OAB-q at Week 4 and 12 (OAB-q Social Interaction Domain)
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Score of Each Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain of OAB-q at Week 4 and 12 (OAB-q Sleep Domain)
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Score of Each Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain of OAB-q at Week 4 and 12 (OAB-q Coping Domain)
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Score of Each Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain of OAB-q at Week 4 and 12 (OAB-q Concern Domain)
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Urine Volume Per 24 Hours at Week 4, 8 and 12
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in IPSS Voiding Domain (Sum Q1, Q3, Q5, and Q6) Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in IPSS Storage Domain (Sum Q2, Q4, and Q7) Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in IPSS Quality of Life (QoL) Score (Q8) Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in IPSS Individual Item Scores (Q1, Q2,Q3, Q4, Q5, Q6, and Q7) Per 24 Hours at Week 12
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in IPSS Individual Item Scores (Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q6, and Q7) Per 24 Hours at Week 4
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Numerical Change From Baseline in Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Severe Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in UUI Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Change From Baseline in UPS Per 24 Hours at Week 12.
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Total Score (Sum Question 1 [Q1] to Q7) Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Numerical Change From Baseline in Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Maximum Urinary Flow Rate (QMAX) Per 24 Hours at Week 12
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting Urinary Retention Requiring Catheterization (All Causalities)
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Numerical Change From Baseline in Urinary Sensation Scale (USS) Sum Rating Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Numerical Change From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Numerical Change From Baseline in Severe Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Numerical Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Numerical Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00546637 (34) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) Per 24 Hours at Week 4
NCT00561951 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12.
NCT00561951 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Night-Time Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 12.
NCT00561951 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 12.
NCT00561951 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline for Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12.
NCT00561951 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12.
NCT00561951 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Voided Volume Per Micturition at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.
NCT00561951 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.
NCT00561951 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.
NCT00561951 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Night-Time Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.
NCT00561951 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.
NCT00561951 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.
NCT00561951 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Each Domain Scores of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12.
NCT00561951 (16) [back to overview]"The Number of Patients With Severe Problems, Score 5 or Many Severe Problems, Score 6 in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12."
NCT00561951 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Voided Volume Per Micturition at Week 12.
NCT00561951 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12.
NCT00561951 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Each Domain Scores of King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ).
NCT00605319 (7) [back to overview]International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Quality of Life (QoL)
NCT00605319 (7) [back to overview]IPSS Irritative
NCT00605319 (7) [back to overview]IPSS Nocturia
NCT00605319 (7) [back to overview]IPSS Obstructive
NCT00605319 (7) [back to overview]Maximum Flow Rate (Qmax)
NCT00605319 (7) [back to overview]Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR)
NCT00605319 (7) [back to overview]Average Flow Rate (Qavg)
NCT00611026 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12
NCT00611026 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q): Symptom Bother Score at Week 12
NCT00611026 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Frequency-Urgency Sum (FUS) Per 24 Hours (Synonymous With USS Sum in the Study Protocol)
NCT00611026 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours
NCT00611026 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Severe Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
NCT00611026 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Episodes Per 24 Hours (Urinary Sensation Scale ≥3 in the Diary)
NCT00611026 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 1 and Week 4
NCT00611026 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Urinary Sensation Scale (USS) Rating Per Micturition Per 24 Hours.
NCT00611026 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Voided Volume Per Micturition
NCT00611026 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q): Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) at Week 12
NCT00611026 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)
NCT00611026 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Urgency Perception Scale (UPS). UPS Formerly Known as Patient Perception of Urgency Scale (PPUS) in the Protocol.
NCT00611026 (20) [back to overview]Diary Dry Rate: Percentage of Participants With no Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) in the 3-day Bladder Diary
NCT00611026 (20) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Episodes Per 24 Hours (Urinary Sensation Scale ≥3 in the Diary)
NCT00611026 (20) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
NCT00611026 (20) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline of Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours
NCT00611026 (20) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline of Severe Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
NCT00611026 (20) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline of UUI Episodes Per 24 Hours
NCT00611026 (20) [back to overview]Post-hoc Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT00611026 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
NCT00658684 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4, 8, 28 and 52
NCT00658684 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions at Week 4, 8, 28 and 52
NCT00658684 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4, 8, 28 and 52
NCT00658684 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Grade of PPBC at Week 28 and 52
NCT00658684 (11) [back to overview]The Number of Subjects Shifted in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) Responses From Baseilne to Week 28 and 52 Assessment and Its Percentage
NCT00658684 (11) [back to overview]Safety Measurement Based on Adverse Events (AEs), Vital Signs, Clinical Laboratory Test, 12-lead ECG and Residual Urine Volume
NCT00658684 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 28 and 52
NCT00658684 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Score of King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) at Week 28 and 52
NCT00658684 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Nighttime Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4, 8, 28 and 52
NCT00658684 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Voided Volume Per Micturition at Week 4, 8, 28 and 52
NCT00658684 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4, 8, 28 and 52
NCT00691093 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Scores of OAB-q at Visit 4
NCT00691093 (13) [back to overview]Efficacy and Tolerability Compared to Previous Medication (Overall Treatment Effect Scale) at Visit 4
NCT00691093 (13) [back to overview]Time To Onset Of Treatment Response
NCT00691093 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Each Visit
NCT00691093 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4
NCT00691093 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Urine Volume at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4
NCT00691093 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4
NCT00691093 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Urgency Episode Frequency (UEF) Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4
NCT00691093 (13) [back to overview]Clinical Global Evaluation of Fesoterodine
NCT00691093 (13) [back to overview]Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q): Symptom Severity/Bother Scale
NCT00691093 (13) [back to overview]Patient's Global Evaluation of Fesoterodine
NCT00691093 (13) [back to overview]Reasons for Study Treatment Dose Changes
NCT00691093 (13) [back to overview]Study Doses
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline of Severe Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Incontinent at Baseline and Became Dry
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline of UUI Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 24
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Severe Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 24
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of UUI Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 24
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 24
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 24
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Improvement at Week 12
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Daily Sum Rating in USS at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Profile Utility Score at Week 12
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Scores at Week 12
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Severe Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) at Week 12
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Skin Protective Agents Used by Participants at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in OAB-q Subscale Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Satisfaction Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom/Bother Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Satisfaction Questionnaire (OAB-q) Total Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in PPBC at Week 12
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in PPBC at Week 8
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in PPUS at Week 12
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in PPUS at Week 8
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Change From Baseline Patient Perception of Urgency Scale (PPUS) at Week 4
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Change From Week 12 in OAB-S Scale for OAB Medication Expectation at Week 24
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Change From Week 12 in Overactive Bladder Satisfaction (OAB-S) Scale for Satisfaction With OAB Control at Week 24
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
NCT00798434 (33) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
NCT00806494 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Scores at Week 12
NCT00806494 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Incontinence Pads Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4 and 12
NCT00806494 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4 and 12
NCT00806494 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Urgency Episodes (NUEs) Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4 and 12
NCT00806494 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score at Weeks 4 and 12
NCT00806494 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Weeks 4 and 12
NCT00806494 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) at Weeks 4 and 12
NCT00806494 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Each Categorical Response at Week 12 for Benefit, Satisfaction and Willingness to Continue (BSW) Questionnaire
NCT00806494 (21) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4 and 12
NCT00806494 (21) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in NUEs Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4 and 12
NCT00806494 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4
NCT00806494 (21) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in SUEs Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4 and 12
NCT00806494 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 12
NCT00806494 (21) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in UUI Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4 and 12
NCT00806494 (21) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4 and 12
NCT00806494 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4 and 12
NCT00806494 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4 and 12
NCT00806494 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Severe Urgency Episodes (SUEs) Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4 and 12
NCT00806494 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reporting Satisfaction on the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ) at Week 12
NCT00806494 (21) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in the Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4 and 12
NCT00806494 (21) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) Score at Week 12
NCT00832650 (9) [back to overview]Time to Gastric Emptying
NCT00832650 (9) [back to overview]Proximal Colonic Emptying Time
NCT00832650 (9) [back to overview]Mean Score of Stool Consistency Per Day
NCT00832650 (9) [back to overview]Mean Proportion of Bowel Movements With Satisfaction Per Day
NCT00832650 (9) [back to overview]Mean Number of Stools Per Day
NCT00832650 (9) [back to overview]Colonic Transit at 48 Hours
NCT00832650 (9) [back to overview]Colonic Transit at 24 Hours
NCT00832650 (9) [back to overview]Colonic Filling at 6 Hours
NCT00832650 (9) [back to overview]Average Score of Ease of Passage During Defecation Per Day
NCT00857896 (4) [back to overview]Post-void Residual (PVR) Volume
NCT00857896 (4) [back to overview]Absorption Rate Constant (Ka)
NCT00857896 (4) [back to overview]Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F)
NCT00857896 (4) [back to overview]Apparent Volume of Distribution (VC/F)
NCT00862745 (1) [back to overview]Change in Frequency of Urge Urinary Incontinence Episodes at Week 12.
NCT00879398 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Final Efficacy Assessment of Effective by Baseline and Treatment Characteristics
NCT00879398 (7) [back to overview]Participant Perception of Bladder Condition at the End of Study Treatment
NCT00879398 (7) [back to overview]Investigator's Final Assessment of Effectiveness at the End of Study Treatment
NCT00879398 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of UUI Episodes Per 24 Hours at the End of Study Treatment
NCT00879398 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at the End of Study Treatment
NCT00879398 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at the End of Study Treatment
NCT00879398 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT00911937 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00911937 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 4 and 12
NCT00911937 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Frequency-urgency Sum Rating Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00911937 (28) [back to overview]Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score
NCT00911937 (28) [back to overview]Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours
NCT00911937 (28) [back to overview]Number of Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours
NCT00911937 (28) [back to overview]Number of Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
NCT00911937 (28) [back to overview]Nocturnal Frequency-urgency Sum Rating Per 24 Hours
NCT00911937 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturition-related Nocturnal Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12
NCT00911937 (28) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00911937 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00911937 (28) [back to overview]Frequency-urgency Sum Rating Per 24 Hours
NCT00911937 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Voided Volume Per Nocturnal Micturition at Week 12
NCT00911937 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Voided Volume Per Micturition at Week 12
NCT00911937 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturition-related Nocturnal Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4
NCT00911937 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00911937 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Frequency-urgency Sum Rating Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00911937 (28) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00911937 (28) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00911937 (28) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00911937 (28) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Micturition-related Nocturnal Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00911937 (28) [back to overview]Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q)
NCT00911937 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score at Week 4 and 12
NCT00911937 (28) [back to overview]Mean Voided Volume Per Nocturnal Micturition
NCT00911937 (28) [back to overview]Mean Voided Volume Per Micturition
NCT00911937 (28) [back to overview]Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
NCT00911937 (28) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00911937 (28) [back to overview]Mean Number of Micturition-related Nocturnal Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
NCT00928070 (26) [back to overview]Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
NCT00928070 (26) [back to overview]Mean Number of Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
NCT00928070 (26) [back to overview]Mean Number of Nocturnal Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
NCT00928070 (26) [back to overview]Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours
NCT00928070 (26) [back to overview]Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)
NCT00928070 (26) [back to overview]Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score
NCT00928070 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00928070 (26) [back to overview]Frequency-Urgency Sum Rating Per 24 Hours
NCT00928070 (26) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overactive Bladder Satisfaction Questionnaire (OAB-S) Global Medication Satisfaction Question Response
NCT00928070 (26) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12
NCT00928070 (26) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00928070 (26) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00928070 (26) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00928070 (26) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00928070 (26) [back to overview]Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q)
NCT00928070 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Volume at Week 4 and 12
NCT00928070 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score at Week 4 and 12
NCT00928070 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Protective Undergarments Changed Due to Urinary Leakage Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00928070 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00928070 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturition-related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00928070 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 4 and 12
NCT00928070 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Frequency-Urgency Sum Rating Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12
NCT00928070 (26) [back to overview]Overactive Bladder Satisfaction Questionnaire (OAB-S) Total Score on Satisfaction With OAB Control
NCT00928070 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12
NCT00928070 (26) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4
NCT00928070 (26) [back to overview]Change From Screening in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score at Week 12
NCT00943735 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Agreed That They Increased Their Knowledge of Healthy Bladder Behaviors
NCT00943735 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Agreed That They Had a Good Understanding About Their Condition and How to Treat it
NCT00943735 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Agreed That They Found the YourWay Program Materials Easy to Understand
NCT00943735 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Agreed That the YourWay Program Provided a Good Amount of Information
NCT00943735 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Agreed That the YourWay Plan Provided a Strong Support System That Participants Could Count on for Information and Advice
NCT00943735 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Agreed That the YourWay Plan Helped Them Play a More Active Role in Managing Their Condition
NCT00943735 (30) [back to overview]Among Participants Who Used the YourWay Website, the Percentage of Participants Who Agreed That the Website Was Useful
NCT00943735 (30) [back to overview]"Percentage of Participants Who Reported That They Trained Their Bladder to Wait"
NCT00943735 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Reported Having Adopted Lifestyle Changes to Help Improve Their Overactive Bladder (OAB) Symptoms
NCT00943735 (30) [back to overview]Comparison of Percentage of Participants Who Agreed That They Had a Good Understanding About Their Condition and How to Treat it, Between Enrollment Date and End of Study CATI Interview
NCT00943735 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Visited the YourWay Website
NCT00943735 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Reported They Were Satisfied With Their Physician
NCT00943735 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Reported They Were Satisfied With the Treatment Goals and Bladder Symptoms Progress Trackers
NCT00943735 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Filled at Least Two Fesoterodine Prescriptions (First Refill) During the Study Period
NCT00943735 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Filled at Least One Fesoterodine Prescription During the Study Period (Primary Adherence)
NCT00943735 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Filled at Least 90 Days Supply of Fesoterodine (4mg QD or 8mg QD) Within 90 Days of Study Enrollment
NCT00943735 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Agreed That They Were Able to Incorporate the YourWay Plan Into Their Lives
NCT00943735 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Agreed That They Understood What to Expect From Their OAB Medication, Toviaz® (Fesoterodine)
NCT00943735 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Agreed That They Understand OAB is a Chronic Condition That Can be Successfully Managed, But Generally Not Cured
NCT00943735 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Agreed That They Learned Something About Their Condition
NCT00943735 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Reported They Felt Confident That They Could Manage Their OAB as a Result of the YourWay Plan
NCT00943735 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Reported They Were Satisfied With the Overall Content of the YourWay Plan
NCT00943735 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Reported They Were Satisfied With the Participant Support Telephone Calls
NCT00943735 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Reported That They Kept Track of Symptoms in the 12 Week Tracker Bladder Diary
NCT00943735 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Reported That They Took Toviaz® (Fesoterodine) as Directed
NCT00943735 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Reported That They Recorded Their Treatment Goals in the Daily Core 4 Tracker
NCT00943735 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Reported the YourWay Plan Encouraged Their Use of Toviaz® (Fesoterodine)
NCT00943735 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Reported That They Made Bladder-friendly Food and Drink Choices
NCT00943735 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Reported That They Let Their Doctor Know How They Were Doing With the YourWay Plan
NCT00943735 (30) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Reported Having Read the YourWay Plan Materials Received From Their Physician or From the Resource Kit
NCT01042236 (11) [back to overview]Stress Incontinence Episode Frequency Per 24 Hours
NCT01042236 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Closing Urethral Pressure at Day 7
NCT01042236 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Closing Urethral Elastance at Day 7
NCT01042236 (11) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence Episode Frequency Per 24 Hours
NCT01042236 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Opening Urethral Pressure (OUP) at Day 7
NCT01042236 (11) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Stress Incontinence Episode Frequency Per 24 Hours
NCT01042236 (11) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Incontinence Episode Frequency Per 24 Hours
NCT01042236 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Opening Urethral Elastance at Day 7
NCT01042236 (11) [back to overview]Incontinence Episode Frequency Per 24 Hours
NCT01042236 (11) [back to overview]Plasma 5-hydroxymethyl Tolterodine (5- HMT) Concentration
NCT01042236 (11) [back to overview]Urgency Urinary Incontinence Episode Frequency Per 24 Hours
NCT01054222 (16) [back to overview]Mean Number of Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
NCT01054222 (16) [back to overview]Mean Number of Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours (End of Treatment [EOT])
NCT01054222 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Incontinent Participants at Baseline
NCT01054222 (16) [back to overview]Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q)
NCT01054222 (16) [back to overview]King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Scores
NCT01054222 (16) [back to overview]Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
NCT01054222 (16) [back to overview]Mean Number of Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours
NCT01054222 (16) [back to overview]Mean Number of Severe Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
NCT01054222 (16) [back to overview]Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours
NCT01054222 (16) [back to overview]Mean Number of Urinary Incontinence Pads, Barrier Creams and Powder Used Per 24 Hours
NCT01054222 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Month 3,6,9,12,15,18, and End of Treatment
NCT01054222 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Urgency Scale (PPUS) at Months 3,6,9,12,15,18, and End of Treatment
NCT01054222 (16) [back to overview]Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score
NCT01054222 (16) [back to overview]Daily Sum Rating on the Urinary Sensation Scale (USS)
NCT01054222 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With No Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episode
NCT01054222 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Response to Overactive Bladder Satisfaction Questionnaire (OAB-s) (Questions 5, 9, 10a-10d, and 11a-11b)
NCT01091519 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and Month 4
NCT01091519 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Satisfied With Treatment at Month 4
NCT01091519 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Question (TSQ) at Week 4 and Month 4
NCT01091519 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Urgency Scale (PPUS) at Week 4 and Month 4
NCT01161472 (12) [back to overview]CogState Groton Maze Learning Task (GMLT)
NCT01161472 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in CogState Groton Maze Learning Task on Day 6
NCT01161472 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in CogState One Card Learning on Day 6
NCT01161472 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in CogState CPAL on Day 6
NCT01161472 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Computer Based Objective Cognition Testing (CogState) Detection Speed on Day 6
NCT01161472 (12) [back to overview]CogState Continuous Paired Associate Learning (CPAL)
NCT01161472 (12) [back to overview]CogState Identification Speed
NCT01161472 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in CogState Identification Speed on Day 6
NCT01161472 (12) [back to overview]Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)
NCT01161472 (12) [back to overview]Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) on Day 6
NCT01161472 (12) [back to overview]Computer Based Objective Cognition Testing (CogState) Detection Speed
NCT01161472 (12) [back to overview]CogState One Card Learning
NCT01260311 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Seriousness, Severity and Relationship to Treatment
NCT01286454 (5) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Fesoterodine Metabolite (5-HMT)
NCT01286454 (5) [back to overview]Plasma Decay Half Life (t1/2) for Fesoterodine Metabolite (5-HMT)
NCT01286454 (5) [back to overview]Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for Fesoterodine Metabolite (5-HMT)
NCT01286454 (5) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time [AUC (0 - ∞)] for Fesoterodine Metabolite (5-hydroxymethyltolterodine [5-HMT])
NCT01286454 (5) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for Fesoterodine Metabolite (5-HMT)
NCT01302054 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12
NCT01302054 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With No UUI Episodes (Diary Dry Rate)
NCT01302054 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) at Week 12
NCT01302054 (11) [back to overview]Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours
NCT01302054 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With More Than (>) 50 Percent (%) Reduction in UUI Episodes at Week 12 as Compared to Baseline
NCT01302054 (11) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With More Than (>) 50 Percent (%) Reduction in UUI Episodes at Week 12 as Compared to Week -2
NCT01302054 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains and Total HRQL Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12
NCT01302054 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12
NCT01302054 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12
NCT01302054 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score at Week 12
NCT01302054 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 12
NCT01302067 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) at Week 12.
NCT01302067 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12.
NCT01302067 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Became Dry at Week 4.
NCT01302067 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Became Dry at Week 12.
NCT01302067 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Percentage of UUI Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4.
NCT01302067 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Percentage of UUI Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12.
NCT01302067 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Percentage of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4.
NCT01302067 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Percentage of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 12.
NCT01302067 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Percentage of Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4.
NCT01302067 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Percentage of Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12.
NCT01302067 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4.
NCT01302067 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12.
NCT01302067 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL)-Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12.
NCT01302067 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL)-Social Interaction Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12.
NCT01302067 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL)-Sleep Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12.
NCT01302067 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL)-Coping Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12.
NCT01302067 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL)-Concern Domain and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12.
NCT01302067 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of UUI Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4.
NCT01302067 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12.
NCT01302067 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4.
NCT01302067 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 12.
NCT01302067 (22) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score at Week 12.
NCT01367886 (4) [back to overview]Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) to Assess Bother From Urinary Frequency at Baseline and at 6 Weeks.
NCT01367886 (4) [back to overview]Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Will be Used to Assess Bother From Urinary Urgency at Baseline and at 6 Weeks..
NCT01367886 (4) [back to overview]Bladder Diary (Using Urinary Sensation Scale Found in Bladder Diary) to Assess Urinary Urgency at Baseline and at 6-week Treatment
NCT01367886 (4) [back to overview]Bladder Diary to Assess Urinary Frequency at Baseline and at End of 6-week Treatment
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Maximum Cystometric Bladder Capacity at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Catheterizations Per 24 Hours at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions or Catheterizations Per 24 Hours at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition or Catheterization at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Post-Void Residual Volume at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities: Active Comparator/Efficacy Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities: Safety Extension Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes in Physical Examination Findings From Baseline to Week 12: Active Comparator/Efficacy Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes in Physical Examination Findings From Baseline to Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Urinary Tract Infections (UTI): Active Comparator/Efficacy Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Urinary Tract Infections (UTI): Safety Extension Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Volume of Distribution (Vd) of Fesoterodine
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Dropped Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 10 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Dropped Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 10 Pegs Group at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Dropped Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 25 Pegs Group at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Placed Correctly Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 10 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Placed Correctly Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 10 Pegs Group at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Placed Correctly Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 25 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Placed Correctly Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 25 Pegs Group at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Post-Void Residual (PVR) Volume at Weeks 4, 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Time to Completion Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 10 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Time to Completion Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 10 Pegs Group at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Time to Completion Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 25 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Time to Completion Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 25 Pegs Group at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Visual Accommodation at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Visual Accommodation at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Number of Participants Meeting Pre-defined Criteria for Vital Signs Values From Baseline Through Week 12: Active Comparator/Efficacy Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Number of Participants Meeting Pre-defined Criteria for Vital Signs Values From Baseline Through Week 24: Safety Extension Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline at Week 12 in Involuntary Detrusor Contractions (IDC): Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Dropped Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 25 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Volume Voided Per Catheterization at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Safety Extension Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Absorption Rate Constant (Ka) of Fesoterodine
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of Fesoterodine
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Bladder Compliance at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Bladder Volume at First Involuntary Detrusor Contraction (IDC) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
NCT01557244 (48) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Detrusor Pressure at Maximum Bladder Capacity at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase
NCT01786967 (2) [back to overview]Percentage With Moderate to Severe Anticipated Drug Associated Adverse Events
NCT01786967 (2) [back to overview]Percentage With Treatment Success
NCT01936870 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events Unexpected From Japanese Package Insert
NCT01936870 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events Among Whose Dose Was Increased From 4 mg to 8 mg
NCT01936870 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score at 12 Weeks
NCT01936870 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) at 12 Weeks
NCT01936870 (11) [back to overview]Clinical Efficacy Rate
NCT01936870 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events Related to Cognitive Function Disorder
NCT01936870 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events
NCT01936870 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Serious Adverse Events
NCT01936870 (11) [back to overview]Satisfaction Rate
NCT01936870 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events Among Whom Received Concomitant CYP2D6 Inhibitors
NCT01936870 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events Among Whom Received Concomitant CYP3A4 Inhibitors
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Visual Accommodation at Week 12: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Visual Accommodation at Week 28: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Vital Sign (Pulse Rate) at Final Visit: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions or Catheterizations Combined Per 24 Hours at Week 12 of Study A0221047 and at Week 28 and Final Visit of Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Vital Sign (Pulse Rate) at Week 12: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Vital Sign (Pulse Rate) at Week 28: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Event Urinary Tract Infections (UTI): Merged Data of Studies A0221047 and A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Bladder Compliance at Week 12 of Study A0221047 and at Week 28 and Final Visit of Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Bladder Volume at First Involuntary Detrusor Contraction (IDC) at Week 12 of Study A0221047 and at Week 28 and Final Visit of Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Bladder Volume at First Involuntary Detrusor Contraction (IDC) at Week 12 of Study A0221047 and at Week 28 and Final Visit of Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Final Visit: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 12: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 28: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Total Score (Raw Score) at Final Visit: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 12: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 28: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Detrusor Pressure at Maximum Bladder Capacity at Week 12 of Study A0221047 and at Week 28 and Final Visit of Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (10 Pegs Group) at Final Visit- Number of Pegs Dropped: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (10 Pegs Group) at Final Visit- Number of Pegs Placed Correctly: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (10 Pegs Group) at Final Visit- Time to Completion: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (10 Pegs Group) at Week 12- Number of Pegs Dropped: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (10 Pegs Group) at Week 12- Number of Pegs Placed Correctly: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (10 Pegs Group) at Week 12- Time to Completion: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (10 Pegs Group) at Week 28- Number of Pegs Dropped: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (10 Pegs Group) at Week 28- Number of Pegs Placed Correctly: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (10 Pegs Group) at Week 28- Time to Completion: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity at Final Visit: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity at Week 12: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity at Week 28: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Vital Sign (Blood Pressure) at Final Visit: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Vital Sign (Blood Pressure) at Week 12: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Vital Sign (Blood Pressure) at Week 28: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Presence of Involuntary Detrusor Contraction (IDC) at Baseline and Week 12 of Study A0221047 and at Week 28 and Final Visit of Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Merged Data of Studies A0221047 and A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (25 Pegs Group) at Week 12- Number of Pegs Dropped: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (25 Pegs Group) at Final Visit- Number of Pegs Dropped: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (25 Pegs Group) at Final Visit- Number of Pegs Placed Correctly: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (25 Pegs Group) at Week 12- Time to Completion: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (25 Pegs Group) at Week 28- Number of Pegs Dropped: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (25 Pegs Group) at Week 28- Number of Pegs Placed Correctly: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (25 Pegs Group) at Week 28- Time to Completion: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Maximum Cystometric Bladder Capacity at Week 12 of Study A0221047 and at Week 28 and Final Visit of Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Catheterizations Per 24 Hours at Week 12 of Study A0221047 and at Week 28 and Final Visit of Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12 of Study A0221047 and at Week 28 and Final Visit of Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (25 Pegs Group) at Final Visit- Time to Completion: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 12 of Study A0221047 and at Week 28 and Final Visit of Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (25 Pegs Group) at Week 12- Number of Pegs Placed Correctly: Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12 of Study A0221047 and at Week 28 and Final Visit of Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Volume Voided Per Catheterization at Week 12 of Study A0221047 and at Week 28 and Final Visit of Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition at Week 12 of Study A0221047 and at Week 28 and Final Visit of Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition or Catheterization at Week 12 of Study A0221047 and at Week 28 and Final Visit of Study A0221109
NCT02501928 (53) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Visual Accommodation at Final Visit: Study A0221109
NCT03946124 (1) [back to overview]Measure of Physical Activity
NCT04090190 (2) [back to overview]Inflammatory Markers in Urine Will be Measured Using Immunoenzyme Assays to Measure the Interaction of Anticholinergic Treatment and the Inflammatory Milieu.
NCT04090190 (2) [back to overview]The Effectiveness of Anticholinergic Treatment in Relation to the Urinary Microbiome. Culture to Standard Culture Media Will Pickup Aerobic Bacteria and Yeasts After DNA Extraction and End Point PCR for 16S rDNA Genes.
[back to top]

"Satisfaction With OAB Control Module of Overactive Bladder (OAB) Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ) (OAB-S)"

Module coded on scale (1-very satisfied to 5-very dissatisfied). Coding reversed algorithmically & results transformed: total score range 0-100. Higher final response value associated with better satisfaction. Satisfied on TSQ = very or somewhat satisfied; Not satisfied on TSQ =very or somewhat dissatisfied or neither dissatisfied nor satisfied. (NCT00425100)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
All Subjects (N=473)Subjects satisfied on TSQ (n=377)Subjects not satisfied on TSQ (n=96)
Open Label Week 1274.782.743.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting Satisfaction With Current Overactive Bladder (OAB) Treatment

Number of Participants who responded satisfied = (very satisfied or somewhat satisfied) and dissatisfied = (somewhat dissatisfied or very dissatisfied) to the treatment satisfaction question. (NCT00425100)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Satisfied (very satisfied or somewhat satisfied)Neither dissatisfied nor satisfiedDissatisfied (somewhat or very dissatisfied)
Open Label Week 123784254

[back to top]

Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) Score at Week 12 Relative to Baseline (Categorical Change)

Improvement: negative score change; No change: score change=0; Deterioration: positive score change (NCT00425100)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
ImprovementNo changeDeterioration
Open Label Week 124057210

[back to top]

Treated Subjects Reporting Satisfaction With Their Current OAB Treatment (Supportive Analysis)

Number of participants who responded satisfied = (very satisfied or somewhat satisfied) or dissatisfied = (somewhat dissatisfied or very dissatisfied) to the treatment satisfaction question at Week 12 in the safety set. (NCT00425100)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Satisfied (very satisfied or somewhat satisfied)Neither Dissatisfied nor SatisfiedDissatisfied (somewhat or very dissatisfied)Missing Response (imputed as dissatisfied)
Open Label Week 12378425442

[back to top]

Mean Number of Micturition Episodes Per 24 Hours

The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours is calculated as the total number of micturitions divided by the total number of diary days collected at that visit. (NCT00425100)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionnumber of episodes (Mean)
Open Label Baseline12.7
Open Label Week 129.7

[back to top]

Mean Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours

The mean number of urgency episodes per 24 hours is calculated as the total number of micturitions with Bladder Sensation Scale (BSS) >= 3 divided by the total number of diary days collected at that visit. BSS: 5 point scale measuring need to urinate from 1=no urgency to 5=unable to hold; leak urine. (NCT00425100)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionnumber of episodes (Mean)
Open Label Baseline10.0
Open Label Week 125.0

[back to top]

Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours

The mean number of UUI episodes per 24 hours is calculated as the total number of micturitions with Bladder Sensation Scale (BSS) = 5 divided by the total number of diary days collected at that visit. BSS: 5 point scale measuring need to urinate from 1=no urgency to 5=unable to hold; leak urine. (NCT00425100)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionnumber of episodes (Mean)
Open Label Baseline2.3
Open Label Week 120.6

[back to top]

Mean Rating on the Urinary Sensation Scale

"The mean rating was calculated as the sum of rating scores on the Urinary Sensation Scale divided by the total number of micturitions with non-missing rating at that visit. The scale ranges from 1 no feeling of urgency to 5 unable to hold; leak urine." (NCT00425100)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Open Label Baseline3.2
Open Label Week 122.5

[back to top]

Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours

"Nocturnal micturitions (synonymous with the term nighttime micturitions) were those recorded in the bedtime section of the bladder diary." (NCT00425100)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionnumber of nocturnal micturitions (Mean)
Open Label Baseline2.6
Open Label Week 121.8

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) at Week 12 Relative to Baseline (Categorical Change)

Improvement: positive score change; No improvement: zero or negative score change (NCT00425100)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
ImprovementNo improvement
Open Label Week 12237248

[back to top]

Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) - Symptom Bother Scale

Each item rated by subject on a Likert scale 1 (least symptom bother) to 6 (most symptom bother). Raw scores were transformed to a score from 0 to 100. Once transformed, higher scores represent less favorable outcome. (NCT00425100)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Open Label Baseline57.4
Open Label Week 1228.6

[back to top] [back to top]

Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) Score

"The PPBC score ranges from 1 no problems at all to 6 many severe problems." (NCT00425100)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Open Label Baseline4.9
Open Label Week 123.1

[back to top]

Severe Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours

Severe urgency episodes defined as Urinary Sensation Scale (USS) rating ≥4. Subjects rated the feeling of urgency associated with each micturition episode using USS provided in the bladder diary. Scale ranges from 1=no feeling of urgency to 5=unable to hold; leak urine; decrease indicates an improvement with respect to urgency symptoms. (NCT00425100)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionnumber of episodes (Mean)
Open Label Baseline5.0
Open Label Week 121.5

[back to top]

Sum Rating on the Urinary Sensation Scale

"The sum rating per 24 hours was calculated as the mean rating score on the Urinary Sensation Scale multiplied by the mean number of micturitions per 24 hours at that visit. The scale ranges from 1 no feeling of urgency to 5 unable to hold; leak urine." (NCT00425100)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Open Label Baseline40.4
Open Label Week 1225.2

[back to top]

Urgency Perception Scale (UPS)

"UPS scores range from 0 (I am usually not able to hold urine) to 2 (I am usually able to finish what I am doing before going to the toilet [without leaking])." (NCT00425100)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Open Label Baseline0.8
Open Label Week 121.4

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline of Severe Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours.

Percent change calculated as change in severe urgency episodes (USS rating >= to 4 in diary ) per 24 hours at that visit divided by the baseline number of severe urgency episodes per 24 hours, multiplied by 100. USS is 5-item scale measuring urinary urgency; range is 1 (no feeling of urgency) to 5 (unable to hold; leak urine). (NCT00444925)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12

,,
Interventionpercent change (Median)
Week 1 (n=306, 618, 618)Week 4 [LOCF] (n=311, 630, 624)Week 12 [LOCF] (n=311, 630, 625)
Fesoterodine-25.0-54.5-71.4
Placebo-9.4-25.0-48.0
Tolterodine ER-25.0-45.8-63.4

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours.

Percent change of urgency episodes (USS rating >= to 3 in diary) per 24 hours calculated as change in 24-hour mean at that visit divided by the baseline 24-hour mean multiplied by 100. USS: 5-item scale measuring urinary urgency; range is 1 (no feeling of urgency) to 5 (unable to hold; leak urine). (NCT00444925)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12

,,
Interventionpercent change (Median)
Week 1 (n=306, 619, 621)Week 4 [LOCF] (n=311,631, 627)Week 12 [LOCF] (n=311, 631, 628)
Fesoterodine-9.7-26.9-37.9
Placebo-5.6-11.4-17.6
Tolterodine ER-12.5-23.1-30.8

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline of UUI Episodes Per 24 Hours.

UUI episodes per 24 hours calculated as total number of micturitions with USS of 5 in diary. USS is 5-item scale measuring urinary urgency; range is 1 (no feeling of urgency) to 5 (unable to hold; leak urine). Change calculated as UUI episodes per 24 hours at observation divided by baseline number of UUI episodes per 24 hours, multiplied by 100. (NCT00444925)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12

,,
Interventionpercent change (Median)
Week 1 (n=302, 614, 612)Week 4 [LOCF] (n=307, 626, 618)Week 12 [LOCF] (n=307, 626, 619)
Fesoterodine-53.6-93.2-100.0
Placebo-28.6-60.0-82.1
Tolterodine ER-55.1-85.7-100.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12 (End of Treatment).

UUI per 24 hours: total number of micturitions with Urinary Sensation Scale (USS) of 5 divided by total number of diary days collected at visit. USS: 5-item scale to measure urinary urgency; range: 1 (no feeling of urgency) to 5 (unable to hold; leak urine). Change: mean at observation minus mean at baseline. (NCT00444925)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionnumber of episodes per 24 hours (Mean)
Placebo-1.46
Tolterodine ER-1.61
Fesoterodine-1.72

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline of Micturitions Per 24 Hours.

Percent change of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated as change in 24-hour mean at that visit divided by the baseline 24-hour mean multiplied by 100 (ie, 100% *(Week 12 or 4 - baseline)/baseline). (NCT00444925)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12

,,
Interventionpercent change (Median)
Week 1 (n=307, 622, 623)Week 4 [LOCF] (n=313, 634, 627)Week 12 [LOCF] (n=313, 634, 628)
Fesoterodine-7.9-14.8-18.9
Placebo-2.7-10.3-12.1
Tolterodine ER-7.7-15.0-16.2

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline of Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours.

Percent change of nocturnal micturitions per 24 hours was calculated as change in 24-hour mean at that visit divided by the baseline 24-hour mean multiplied by 100 (ie, 100% *(Week 12 or 4 - baseline)/baseline). Nocturnal (Bedtime) was defined as the time the subject went to bed until he/she arose to start the next day. (NCT00444925)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12

,,
Interventionpercent change (Median)
Week 1 (n=288, 584, 596)Week 4 [LOCF] (n=293, 596, 600)Week 12 [LOCF] (n=293, 596, 601)
Fesoterodine0.0-20.0-28.6
Placebo-10.0-22.2-25.0
Tolterodine ER-12.5-25.0-27.9

[back to top]

Diary Dry Rates

Diary dry rate: number of subjects with no urgency urinary incontinence episode reported in the 3 day diary at the respective time-point; based on USS: 5-item scale measuring urinary urgency; range is 1 (no feeling of urgency) to 5 (unable to hold; leak urine). (NCT00444925)
Timeframe: Week 1, Week 4, Week 12

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Week 1Week 4Week 12
Fesoterodine159306396
Placebo5497138
Tolterodine ER153290358

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q): Symptom Bother Score at Week 12 (End of Treatment).

Symptom bother score derived as sum of scores for questions 1-8; lowest possible raw score: 8; highest possible score: 48. Data analyzed based on transformation of the score to a 0 to 100 scale [(Actual total raw score - lowest possible value of raw score)/by raw score range * 100]. Higher transformed scores indicative of greater symptom bother. Negative change in Symptom Bother score indicates improvement. Change calculated as score at observation minus score at baseline. (NCT00444925)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionscore on scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-16.3
Tolterodine ER-22.5
Fesoterodine-27.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of UUI Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 1 and Week 4.

UUI episodes per 24 hours calculated as total number of micturitions with Urinary Sensation Scale (USS) of 5 divided by total number of diary days collected at visit. USS is 5-item scale measuring urinary urgency; range is 1 (no feeling of urgency) to 5 (unable to hold; leak urine). Change calculated as mean at observation minus mean at baseline. (NCT00444925)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4

,,
Interventionnumber of episodes per 24 hours (Mean)
Week 1 (n=302, 614, 612)Week 4 [LOCF] (n=307, 626, 618)
Fesoterodine-0.95-1.52
Placebo-0.54-1.06
Tolterodine ER-0.92-1.40

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Frequency-Urgency Sum (Formerly Known as Urinary Sensations Scale Sum in Protocol) Per 24 Hours.

Frequency-Urgency Sum rating per 24 hours calculated as mean rating scores on the USS multiplied by the mean number of micturitions per 24 hours at that visit. USS is 5-item scale measuring urinary urgency; range is 1 (no feeling of urgency) to 5 (unable to hold; leak urine). Change calculated as mean at observation minus mean at baseline. (NCT00444925)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12

,,
Interventionscore on scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 1 (n=306, 619, 621)Week 4 [LOCF] (n=311,631, 627)Week 12 [LOCF] (n=311, 631, 628)
Fesoterodine-5.5-10.5-13.2
Placebo-2.4-5.7-8.2
Tolterodine ER-5.7-9.7-12.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours.

The mean number of micturitions was calculated as the sum of all micturitions divided by the total number of diary days collected at that visit. Change calculated as mean at observation minus mean at baseline. (NCT00444925)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12

,,
Interventionnumber of micturitions per 24 hours (Least Squares Mean)
Week 1 (n=307, 622, 623)Week 4 [LOCF] (n= 313, 634, 627)Week 12 [LOCF] (n= 313, 634, 628)
Fesoterodine-1.0-1.9-2.2
Placebo-0.5-1.2-1.5
Tolterodine ER-1.0-1.8-2.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours.

Mean number of nocturnal micturitions per 24 hours was calculated as the sum of all micturitions divided by the total number of diary days collected at that visit. Nocturnal (Bedtime) was defined as the time the subject went to bed until he/she arose to start the next day. (NCT00444925)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12

,,
Interventionnocturnal micturitions per 24 hours (Least Squares Mean)
Week 1 (n=288, 584, 596)Week 4 [LOCF] (n=293, 596, 600)Week 12 [LOCF] (n=293, 596, 601)
Fesoterodine-0.2-0.5-0.6
Placebo-0.1-0.4-0.5
Tolterodine ER-0.3-0.5-0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Severe Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours.

Mean number of severe urgency episodes (USS rating >= to 4 in diary ) per 24 hours: sum of all micturitions divided by total number of diary days collected at that visit. USS: 5-item scale to measure urinary urgency; range: 1 (no feeling of urgency) to 5 (unable to hold; leak urine). Change calculated as mean at observation minus mean at baseline. (NCT00444925)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12

,,
Interventionsevere urgency episodes per 24 hours (Least Squares Mean)
Week 1 (n=306, 618, 618)Week 4 [LOCF] (n=311, 630, 624)Week 12 [LOCF] (n=311, 630, 625)
Fesoterodine-1.2-2.4-3.0
Placebo-0.4-1.2-1.9
Tolterodine ER-1.3-2.2-2.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours.

Mean number urgency episodes (USS rating >= to 3 in diary) per 24 hours calculated as sum of all micturitions divided by total number of diary days collected at visit. USS: 5-item scale measuring urinary urgency; range is 1 (no feeling of urgency) to 5 (unable to hold; leak urine). Change calculated as mean at observation minus mean at baseline. (NCT00444925)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12

,,
Interventionurgency episodes per 24 hours (Least Squares Mean)
Week 1 (n=306, 619, 621)Week 4 [LOCF] (n=311, 631, 627)Week 12 [LOCF] (n=311, 631, 628)
Fesoterodine-1.1-2.6-3.5
Placebo-0.4-1.2-2.0
Tolterodine ER-1.3-2.4-3.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean USS Rating Per Micturition Per 24 Hours.

Mean USS rating calculated as the sum of rating scores on USS per 24 hours divided by the mean number of micturitions per 24 hours at that visit. USS is 5-item scale measuring urinary urgency; range is 1 (no feeling of urgency) to 5 (unable to hold; leak urine). Change calculated as mean at observation minus mean at baseline. (NCT00444925)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12

,,
Interventionscore on scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 1 (n=306, 619, 621)Week 4 [LOCF] (n=311, 631, 627)Week 12 [LOCF] (n=311, 631, 628)
Fesoterodine-0.2-0.5-0.7
Placebo-0.1-0.2-0.4
Tolterodine ER-0.2-0.4-0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Voided Volume Per Micturition.

Mean voided volume calculated as sum of voided volume divided by the total number of micturition episodes with a recorded voided volume greater than 0 in the 3-day diary at that visit. (NCT00444925)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12

,,
Interventionvoided volume per micturition (Least Squares Mean)
Week 1 (n=306, 622, 623)Week 4 [LOCF] (n=313, 633, 625)Week 12 [LOCF] (n=313, 633, 626)
Fesoterodine18.730.532.9
Placebo11.014.016.8
Tolterodine ER19.225.723.5

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC).

Number of subjects in 4-point category: >= to 2 points improvement [major improvement]; 1 point improvement [minor improvement]; no change; deterioration, based on PPBC score (rated on 6-point scale: 1=no problems at all; 6=many severe problems). Score change: score at observation minus score at baseline; re-scaled to 4-point categorical variables. (NCT00444925)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week, 4, Week 12

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Week 1 (n=309, 625, 623), >=2 points improvementWeek 1, 1-point improvementWeek 1, no changeWeek 1, deteriorationWeek 4 (n=313, 632, 629), >=2 points improvementWeek 4, 1-point improvementWeek 4, no changeWeek 4, deteriorationWeek 12 (n=313, 632, 630), >=2 points improvementWeek 12, 1-point improvementWeek 12, no changeWeek 12, deterioration
Fesoterodine102186286491962241763325419814830
Placebo3294147365795127346710211133
Tolterodine ER79181306591692012035921018917162

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Urgency Perception Scale (UPS). UPS Equals Patient Perception of Urgency Scale (PPUS) in Protocol.

Number of subjects in 3-point category: improvement [>=1-point improvement]; no change; deterioration [>=1-point decrease], based on UPS score (rated on 3-point scale: 1=not able to hold urine; 3=able to finish what I am doing). Score change calculated as score at observation minus score at baseline; re-scaled to 3-point categorical variables. (NCT00444925)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Week 1 (n=309, 627, 624), improvementWeek 1, no changeWeek 1, deteriorationWeek 4 (n=313, 633, 629), improvementWeek 4, no changeWeek 4, deteriorationWeek 12 (n=313, 633, 630), improvementWeek 12, no changeWeek 12, deterioration
Fesoterodine171413402563482529131425
Placebo6821823981942111218120
Tolterodine ER162438272383623325434435

[back to top]

Change in Urgency Severity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Relative to Baseline

"The urgency severity VAS Scale records the subject's assessment of the severity of urgency. VAS scale ranges from 1 'Very Mild' to 10 'Very Severe'. Negative change indicated improvement.~Change: mean at observation minus mean at baseline." (NCT00536484)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 6 and Week 12

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 2 (n=441; n=432)Week 6 (n=443; n=434)Week 12 (n=443; n=434)
Fesoterodine-1.4-2.2-2.4
Placebo-0.8-1.4-1.4

[back to top]

Change in Mean Number of Micturition Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12 Relative to Baseline.

"The number of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated as the sum of all micturitions divided by the total number of diary days collected at that visit.~Change: mean at Week 12 minus mean at Baseline" (NCT00536484)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionnumber of episodes per 24 hours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-2.1
Fesoterodine-2.9

[back to top]

Change in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12 Relative to Baseline - Symptom Bother Scale

"Each item rated by subject on a Likert scale 1 (least symptom bother) to 6 (most symptom bother). Raw scores were transformed to a score from 0 to 100. Once transformed a negative change indicates improvement.~Change: mean at Week 12 minus mean at baseline" (NCT00536484)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-20.0
Fesoterodine-27.8

[back to top]

Categorical Change in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) Score Relative to Baseline

PPBC scale range: 1='does not cause me any problems at all' to 6='causes me many severe problems'. Major improvement=negative score change of 2 or more from baseline; minor improvement=negative score change of 1 or more from baseline; no change=0 score change from baseline; Deterioration=positive score change from baseline (NCT00536484)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 6 and Week 12

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 2 (n=440; n=434): major improvementWeek 2: minor improvementWeek 2: no changeWeek 2: deteriorationWeek 6 (n=442; n=435): major improvementWeek 6: minor improvementWeek 6: no changeWeek 6: deteriorationWeek 12 (n=442; n=435): major improvementWeek 12: minor improvementWeek 12: no changeWeek 12: deterioration
Fesoterodine16.639.439.44.632.435.927.83.936.834.525.53.2
Placebo13.234.845.26.824.734.833.57.029.231.033.06.8

[back to top]

Categorical Change in Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) Relative to Baseline

"UPS scores range from 0 (I am usually not able to hold urine) to 2 (I am usually able to finish what I am doing before going to the toilet [without leaking]). Improvement: positive score change; No change: score change=0; Deterioration: negative score change" (NCT00536484)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 6 and Week 12

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 2 (n=441; n=434): improvementWeek 2: no changeWeek 2: deteriorationWeek 6 (n=443; n=435): improvementWeek 6: no changeWeek 6: deteriorationWeek 12 (n=443; n=435): improvementWeek 12: no changeWeek 12: deterioration
Fesoterodine29.364.56.237.558.63.941.852.45.7
Placebo22.969.27.930.265.04.730.962.36.8

[back to top]

Change in Frequency-urgency Sum Per 24 Hours Relative to Baseline

Change in frequency urgency sum is total urinary sensation scale (USS) ratings recorded for all micturitions in 24-hour day. Number of USS ratings per 24 hours is sum of all USS ratings divided by the total diary days collected at that visit. USS scale: 1=No feeling of urgency to 5=Unable to hold:leak urine. Numerical decrease indicates improvement (NCT00536484)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 6 and Week 12

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 2 (n=431; n=427)Week 6 (n=434; n=428)Week 12 (n=434; n=428)
Fesoterodine-8.3-12.5-13.6
Placebo-6.5-9.8-10.3

[back to top] [back to top]

Change in Mean Number of Micturition Episodes Per 24 Hours Relative to Baseline

"The number of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated as the sum of all micturitions divided by the total number of diary days collected at that visit.~Change: mean at observation minus mean at baseline" (NCT00536484)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2 and Week 6

,
Interventionnumber of episodes per 24 hours (Least Squares Mean)
Week 2 (n=431; n=427)Week 6 (n=434; n=428)
Fesoterodine-1.8-2.7
Placebo-1.3-2.0

[back to top]

Change in Nocturnal Micturition Episodes Per 24 Hours Relative to Baseline

Change in number of nocturnal micturitions (NM) recorded in the bladder diary. NM were defined as micturitions that occurred between the time the subject went to bed and the time he or she arose to start the next day. The number of NM per 24 hours was calculated as the sum of all NM divided by the total number of diary days collected at that visit. (NCT00536484)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 6 and Week 12

,
Interventionnumber of episodes per 24 hours (Least Squares Mean)
Week 2 (n=420; n=417)Week 6 (n=423; n=418)Week 12 (n=423; n=418)
Fesoterodine-0.5-0.7-0.8
Placebo-0.5-0.7-0.7

[back to top]

Change in Number of Nocturnal Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours Relative to Baseline

Change in number of nocturnal urgency episodes (NUE) recorded in bladder diary. NUE had urinary sensation scale (USS) rating of 3 or more that occurred between time subject went to bed and time he or she arose to start next day. Number of NUE per 24 hours was calculated as sum of all NUE divided by total number of diary days collected at that visit (NCT00536484)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 6 and Week 12

,
Interventionnumber of episodes per 24 hours (Least Squares Mean)
Week 2 (n=411; n=408)Week 6 (n=414; n=409)Week 12 (n=414; n=409)
Fesoterodine-0.6-0.9-1.0
Placebo-0.6-0.8-0.9

[back to top]

Change in Number of Severe Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours Relative to Baseline

Change in number of severe urgency episodes (urinary sensation scale [USS] rating of 4 or more) recorded in the bladder diary. Scale: 0=no feeling of urgency to 5=unable to hold; leak urine. Number of severe urgency episodes per 24 hours calculated as sum of all severe urgency episodes divided by total number of diary days collected at that visit. (NCT00536484)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 6 and Week 12

,
Interventionnumber of episodes per 24 hours (Least Squares Mean)
Week 2 (n=393; n=403)Week 6 (n=396; n=404)Week 12 (n=396; n=404)
Fesoterodine-1.8-2.6-2.9
Placebo-1.6-2.2-2.2

[back to top]

Change in Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours Relative to Baseline

Change in number of urgency episodes (urinary sensation scale [USS] rating of 3 or more) recorded in the bladder diary. Scale: 0=no feeling of urgency to 5=unable to hold; leak urine. The number of urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated as the sum of all urgency episodes divided by the total number of diary days collected at that visit. (NCT00536484)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 6 and Week 12

,
Interventionnumber of episodes per 24 hours (Least Squares Mean)
Week 2 (n=431; n=427)Week 6 (n=434; n=428)Week 12 (n=434; n=428)
Fesoterodine-2.3-3.5-4.0
Placebo-1.9-2.9-3.0

[back to top]

Change in Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours Relative to Baseline

Change in number of UUI episodes (urinary sensation scale [USS] rating of 5) recorded in the bladder diary. Scale: 0=no feeling of urgency to 5=unable to hold; leak urine (NCT00536484)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 6 and Week 12

,
Interventionnumber of episodes per 24 hours (Least Squares Mean)
Week 2 (n=255; n=251)Week 6 (n=257; n=251)week 12 (n=257; n=251)
Fesoterodine-1.1-1.5-1.5
Placebo-0.9-1.2-1.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in PPBC Per 24 Hours at Week 12

"PPBC: self-administered, single-item, validated questionnaire. Rated on a 6-point scale: subject was asked: Which of the following statements describes your bladder condition best at the moment? 1=no problems at all; 2=some very minor problems; 3=some minor problems; 4=some moderate problems; 5=severe problems; 6=many severe problems. A post-baseline vs baseline variable with ordinal values was derived: 1=Deterioration=Difference in scores was positive; 2=No Change=Difference in scores was 0; 3=Minor Improvement=Difference in scores was -1; 4=Major Improvement=Difference in scores was ≤ 2." (NCT00546637)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Major ImprovementMinor ImprovementNo ChangeDeterioration
Fesoterodine 4mg or 8mg12416614821
Placebo13013817021

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) Per 24 Hours at Week 4

"PPBC: self-administered, single-item, validated questionnaire. Rated on a 6-point scale: subject was asked: Which of the following statements describes your bladder condition best at the moment? 1=no problems at all; 2=some very minor problems; 3=some minor problems; 4=some moderate problems; 5=severe problems; 6=many severe problems. A post-baseline vs baseline variable with ordinal values was derived: 1=Deterioration=Difference in scores was positive; 2=No Change=Difference in scores was 0; 3=Minor Improvement=Difference in scores was -1; 4=Major Improvement=Difference in scores was ≤ 2." (NCT00546637)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Major ImprovementMinor ImprovementNo ChangeDeterioration
Fesoterodine 4mg or 8mg8317118025
Placebo6316021222

[back to top]

Numerical Change From Baseline in Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12

All micturitions with USS rating 1 to 5. USS rating: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of micturitions divided by the total number of diary days collected at that visit. Numeric change of micturitions per 24 hours at Week 4 and 12 relative to Baseline. (NCT00546637)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and 12

,
Interventionnumber of micturitions (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=445, n=451)Week 12 (n=446, n=452)
Fesoterodine 4mg or 8mg-1.3-1.9
Placebo-0.8-1.5

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Urine Volume Per 24 Hours at Week 4, 8 and 12

Post-void residual volume measurement was measured by an ultrasound at Baseline, and at Weeks 4, 8 and 12. (NCT00546637)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 8 and 12

,
Interventionml (Median)
Week 4Week 8Week 12
Fesoterodine 4mg or 8mg0.00.03.5
Placebo0.00.00.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12

OAB-q is a self-administered, 33-item, validated questionnaire that assesses how much the subject has been bothered by selected bladder symptoms during the previous week. Each item rated by subject on Likert scale 1 (least symptom bother) to 6 (most symptom bother). Raw scores were transformed to a score from 0-100. Once transformed, higher scores represent less favorable outcome. (NCT00546637)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and 12

,
Interventionscores on scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=459, n=458)Week 12 (n=459, n=459)
Fesoterodine 4mg or 8mg-11.6-15.2
Placebo-8.9-12.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in IPSS Voiding Domain (Sum Q1, Q3, Q5, and Q6) Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12

The IPSS Total Score is obtained by combining the scores of the responses to 1 though 7 component questions. Each question is scored from 0-5. Total IPSS range = 0-35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Sum of Q1, Q3, Q5, and Q6 range = 0-20 points. (NCT00546637)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and 12

,
Interventionscores on scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=454, n=455)Week 12 (n=455, n=457)
Fesoterodine 4mg or 8mg-1.6-2.1
Placebo-1.7-2.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in IPSS Storage Domain (Sum Q2, Q4, and Q7) Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12

The IPSS Total Score is obtained by combining the scores of the responses to 1 though 7 component questions. Each question is scored from 0-5. Total IPSS range = 0-35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Sum of Q2, Q4, and Q7 range = 0-15 points. (NCT00546637)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and 12

,
Interventionscores on scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=456, n=457)Week 12 (n=456, n=458)
Fesoterodine 4mg or 8mg-1.8-2.4
Placebo-1.4-2.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in IPSS Quality of Life (QoL) Score (Q8) Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12

The IPSS Total Score is obtained by combining the scores of the responses to 1 though 7 component questions. Each question is scored from 0-5. Total IPSS range = 0-35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. Score of Q8 range = 0-5 points. (NCT00546637)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and 12

,
Interventionscores on scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=455, n=455)Week 12 (n=455, 457)
Fesoterodine 4mg or 8mg-0.6-1.0
Placebo-0.5-1.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in IPSS Individual Item Scores (Q1, Q2,Q3, Q4, Q5, Q6, and Q7) Per 24 Hours at Week 12

The IPSS Total Score is obtained by combining the scores of the responses to 1 though 7 component questions. Each question is scored from 0-5 for an IPSS range of 0-35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. (NCT00546637)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionscores on scale (Least Squares Mean)
Q1 (sensation of not emptying bladder?)Q2 (urinate less than two hours after urination?)Q3 (stop and start several times during urination?Q4 (difficulty postponing urination?)Q5 (weak urinary stream?)Q6 (strain to begin urination?)Q7 (urinate at night?)
Fesoterodine 4mg or 8mg-0.7-0.9-0.5-0.9-0.6-0.3-0.5
Placebo-0.8-0.8-0.6-0.8-0.6-0.3-0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in IPSS Individual Item Scores (Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q6, and Q7) Per 24 Hours at Week 4

The IPSS Total Score is obtained by combining the scores of the responses to 1 though 7 component questions. Each question is scored from 0-5. Total IPSS range = 0-35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. (NCT00546637)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4

,
Interventionscores on scale (Least Squares Mean)
Q1 (sensation of not emptying bladder?)Q2 (urinate less than two hours after urination?)Q3 (stop and start several times during urination?Q4 (difficulty postponing urination?)Q5 (weak urinary stream?)Q6 (strain to begin urination?)Q7 (urinate at night?)
Fesoterodine 4mg or 8mg-0.6-0.8-0.4-0.7-0.5-0.2-0.3
Placebo-0.6-0.5-0.4-0.6-0.4-0.3-0.3

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12

Nocturnal micturitions were defined as micturitions with USS rating 1-5 that occurred between the time the subject went to bed and the time he or she arose to start the next day. USS rating: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. The percentage change at Week 4 or 12 was calculated as: 100* (Nocturnal micturitions at Week 4 or 12 - Baseline)/Baseline (NCT00546637)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and 12

,
Interventionpercent change (Median)
Week 4 (n=438, n=441)Week 12 (n=439, n=442)
Fesoterodine 4mg or 8mg-16.7-25.0
Placebo-11.1-16.7

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in UUI Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12

UUI episodes are defined as those micturitions with a USS rating of 5 in the bladder diary in subjects with UUI at baseline. USS rating 5: Unable to hold; leak urine. The percentage change at Week 4 or 12 was calculated as: 100* (UUI Episodes at Week 4 or 12 - Baseline)/Baseline (NCT00546637)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and 12

,
Interventionpercent change (Median)
Week 4 (n=103, n=104)Week 12 (n=103, n=104)
Fesoterodine 4mg or 8mg-100.0-100.0
Placebo-100.0-100.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Change From Baseline in UPS Per 24 Hours at Week 12.

Number of participants in 3-point category: improvement [>=1-point improvement]; no change; deterioration [>=1-point decrease], based on UPS score (rated on 3-point scale: 1=not able to hold urine; 3=able to finish what I am doing). Score change calculated as score at observation minus score at baseline; re-scaled to 3-point categorical variables. (NCT00546637)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
ImprovementNo ChangeDeterioration
Fesoterodine 4mg or 8mg13229037
Placebo12929931

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Total Score (Sum Question 1 [Q1] to Q7) Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12

The IPSS Total Score is obtained by combining the scores of the responses to 1 though 7 component questions. Each question is scored from 0-5 for an IPSS range of 0-35 points; higher numerical scores from the IPSS questionnaire represent greater severity of symptoms. (NCT00546637)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and 12

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=453, n=454)Week 12 (n=454, n=456)
Fesoterodine 4mg or 8mg-3.4-4.4
Placebo-3.1-4.4

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12

All micturitions with USS rating 1 to 5. USS rating: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. The percentage change at Week 4 or 12 was calculated as: 100* (Micturitions at Week 4 or 12 - Baseline)/Baseline (NCT00546637)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and 12

,
Interventionpercent change (Median)
Week 4 (n=445, n=451)Week 12 (n=446, n=452)
Fesoterodine 4mg or 8mg-12.0-14.9
Placebo-7.3-12.5

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Maximum Urinary Flow Rate (QMAX) Per 24 Hours at Week 12

Maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) was recorded at Baseline and Week 12 visit. (NCT00546637)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionml/sec (Median)
Fesoterodine 4mg or 8mg0.0
Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting Urinary Retention Requiring Catheterization (All Causalities)

Number of participants experiencing serious and non-serious adverse events of acute urinary retention requiring catheterization. (NCT00546637)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Fesoterodine 4mg or 8mg1
Placebo1

[back to top] [back to top]

Numerical Change From Baseline in Urinary Sensation Scale (USS) Sum Rating Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12

The USS sum rating was defined as the total of USS ratings recorded for all micturitions over the course of a day in the bladder diary. USS rating: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. USS Sum rating per 24 hours was calculated as the mean rating scores on the USS multiplied by the mean number of micturitions per 24 hours at that visit. (NCT00546637)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and 12

,
InterventionUSS Sum rating per 24 hours (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=445, n=451)Week 12 (n=446, n=452)
Fesoterodine 4mg or 8mg-6.4-8.9
Placebo-4.7-7.8

[back to top]

Numerical Change From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12

UUI episodes were defined as those micturitions with USS rating of 5 in the diary in subjects with UUI at baseline. USS rating 5: Unable to hold; leak urine. (NCT00546637)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 12

,
Interventionnumber of episodes (Median)
Week 4 (n=103, n=104)Week 12 (n=103, n=104)
Fesoterodine 4mg or 8mg-0.3-0.7
Placebo-0.7-0.7

[back to top] [back to top]

Numerical Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12

Nocturnal micturitions were defined as micturitions with USS rating 1-5 that occurred between the time the subject went to bed and the time he or she arose to start the next day. USS rating: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. The mean number of nocturnal micturitions per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of nocturnal micturitions divided by the total number of diary days collected at that visit. (NCT00546637)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and 12

,
Interventionnumber of micturitions (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=438, n=441)Week 12 (n=439, n=442)
Fesoterodine 4mg or 8mg-0.4-0.6
Placebo-0.3-0.5

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) Per 24 Hours at Week 4

Number of participants in 3-point category: improvement [>=1-point improvement]; no change; deterioration [>=1-point decrease], based on UPS score (rated on 3-point scale: 1=not able to hold urine; 3=able to finish what I am doing). Score change calculated as score at observation minus score at baseline; re-scaled to 3-point categorical variables. (NCT00546637)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
ImprovementNo ChangeDeterioration
Fesoterodine 4mg or 8mg11130641
Placebo9832634

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12.

"Number of urgency episodes was measured by the 3-day micturition diary completed for 3 consecutive days during the 7 days prior to each visit.~Urgency is the complaint of a sudden compelling desire to pass urine which is difficult to defer.~Change: mean at Week 12 minus mean at Baseline." (NCT00561951)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionUrgency Episodes (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.00
Fesoterodine 4 mg-1.65
Fesoterodine 8 mg-1.66

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Night-Time Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 12.

"Number of Night-Time Micturitions was measured by the 3-day micturition diary completed for 3 consecutive days during the 7 days prior to each visit.~Change: mean at Week 12 minus mean at Baseline." (NCT00561951)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionNight-Time Micturitions (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.18
Fesoterodine 4 mg-0.21
Fesoterodine 8 mg-0.29

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 12.

"Number of micturitions was measured by the 3-day micturition diary completed for 3 consecutive days during the 7 days prior to each visit.~Change: mean at Week 12 minus mean at Baseline." (NCT00561951)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionMicturitions (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.59
Fesoterodine 4 mg-1.15
Fesoterodine 8 mg-1.25

[back to top]

Change From Baseline for Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12.

"Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) score is rated on a 6-point scale as follows:~No problems at all~Some very minor problems~Some minor problems~Some moderate problems~Severe problems~Many severe problems~Change: mean at Week 12 minus mean at Baseline." (NCT00561951)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Interventionscore on scale (Mean)
Placebo-1.57
Fesoterodine 4 mg-1.83
Fesoterodine 8 mg-1.76

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12.

"Number of incontinence episodes was measured by the 3-day micturition diary completed for 3 consecutive days during the 7 days prior to each visit.~Incontinence is the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine.~Change: mean at Week 12 minus mean at Baseline." (NCT00561951)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionIncontinence Episodes (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.88
Fesoterodine 4 mg-1.27
Fesoterodine 8 mg-1.15

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Voided Volume Per Micturition at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

"Voided volume per micturition was measured by the 3-day micturition diary completed for 3 consecutive days during the 7 days prior to each visit.~Change: mean at each visit minus mean at Baseline." (NCT00561951)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

,,
InterventionmL (Mean)
Week 2 (n=308, 314, 304)Week 4 (n=301, 303, 296)Week 8 (n=289, 289, 287)Week 12 (n=284, 284, 281)
Fesoterodine 4 mg13.6321.6222.0524.52
Fesoterodine 8 mg21.5227.4130.9433.40
Placebo5.069.2310.7513.28

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

"Number of urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) episodes was measured by the 3-day micturition diary completed for 3 consecutive days during the 7 days prior to each visit.~Urgency urinary incontinence is the complaint of involuntary leakage accompanied by or immediately preceded by urgency. Urgency is the complaint of a sudden compelling desire to pass urine which is difficult to defer.~Change: mean at each visit minus mean at Baseline." (NCT00561951)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

,,
InterventionUUI Episodes (Mean)
Week 2 (n=308, 314, 305)Week 4 (n=301, 303, 296)Week 8 (n=289, 289, 287)Week 12 (n=284, 284, 281)
Fesoterodine 4 mg-1.10-1.48-1.61-1.76
Fesoterodine 8 mg-1.12-1.49-1.65-1.87
Placebo-0.79-1.15-1.45-1.49

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

"Number of urgency episodes was measured by the 3-day micturition diary completed for 3 consecutive days during the 7 days prior to each visit.~Urgency is the complaint of a sudden compelling desire to pass urine which is difficult to defer.~Change: mean at each visit minus mean at Baseline." (NCT00561951)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

,,
InterventionUrgency Episodes (Mean)
Week 2 (n=308, 314, 305)Week 4 (n=301, 303, 296)Week 8 (n=289, 289, 287)Week 12 (n=284, 284, 281)
Fesoterodine 4 mg-1.37-2.16-2.50-2.89
Fesoterodine 8 mg-1.59-2.16-2.71-3.05
Placebo-0.79-1.60-2.34-2.37

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Night-Time Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

"Number of Night-Time Micturitions was measured by the 3-day micturition diary completed for 3 consecutive days during the 7 days prior to each visit.~Change: mean at each visit minus mean at Baseline." (NCT00561951)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

,,
InterventionNight-Time Micturitions (Mean)
Week 2 (n=242, 256, 256)Week 4 (n=236, 246, 248)Week 8 (n=224, 232, 241)Week 12 (n=220, 229, 236)
Fesoterodine 4 mg-0.24-0.30-0.45-0.48
Fesoterodine 8 mg-0.34-0.46-0.58-0.63
Placebo-0.25-0.30-0.41-0.44

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

"Number of micturitions was measured by the 3-day micturition diary completed for 3 consecutive days during the 7 days prior to each visit.~Change: mean at each visit minus mean at Baseline." (NCT00561951)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

,,
InterventionMicturitions (Mean)
Week 2 (n=308, 314, 305)Week 4 (n=301, 303, 296)Week 8 (n=289, 289, 287)Week 12 (n=284, 284, 281)
Fesoterodine 4 mg-0.94-1.33-1.81-2.13
Fesoterodine 8 mg-1.06-1.60-2.15-2.17
Placebo-0.47-0.85-1.36-1.36

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

"Number of incontinence episodes was measured by the 3-day micturition diary completed for 3 consecutive days during the 7 days prior to each visit.~Incontinence is the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine.~Change: mean at each visit minus mean at Baseline." (NCT00561951)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

,,
InterventionIncontinence Episodes (Mean)
Week 2 (n=308, 314, 305)Week 4 (n=301, 303, 296)Week 8 (n=289, 289, 287)Week 12 (n=284, 284, 281)
Fesoterodine 4 mg-1.11-1.61-1.76-1.97
Fesoterodine 8 mg-1.06-1.50-1.73-1.86
Placebo-0.80-1.22-1.56-1.59

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Each Domain Scores of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12.

"The overactive bladder questionnaire (OAB-q) is used to assess the extent of participants who had been bothered by selected bladder symptoms and to assess the effect on their health-related quality of life (HRQL).~The each domain score ranges from 0 to 100 is a calculated value, where 0=minimal symptom severity and 100=greatest symptom severity for Symptom Bother Score, and where 0=worst HRQL outcome/response and 100=best HRQL outcome/response for HRQL domains including total score of HROL domain.~Change: mean at Week 12 minus mean at Baseline." (NCT00561951)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

,,
Interventionscore on scale (Mean)
Symptom Bother ScoreTotal Score of HRQL domainCoping Score of HRQL domainConcern Score of HRQL domainSleep Score of HRQL domainSocial Score of HRQL domain
Fesoterodine 4 mg-26.6117.8421.0120.0516.1611.35
Fesoterodine 8 mg-26.3517.2921.4819.1015.359.98
Placebo-18.2512.8816.5413.2512.037.37

[back to top]

"The Number of Patients With Severe Problems, Score 5 or Many Severe Problems, Score 6 in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12."

"Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) score is rated on a 6-point scale as follows:~No problems at all~Some very minor problems~Some minor problems~Some moderate problems~Severe problems~Many severe problems" (NCT00561951)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
BaselineWeek 12
Fesoterodine 4 mg9712
Fesoterodine 8 mg8319
Placebo8228

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Voided Volume Per Micturition at Week 12.

"Voided volume per micturition was measured by the 3-day micturition diary completed for 3 consecutive days during the 7 days prior to each visit.~Voided volume was recorded during any 1 day of 3-day diary period through the first micturition of the next day.~Change: mean at Week 12 minus mean at Baseline." (NCT00561951)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionmL (Mean)
Placebo13.07
Fesoterodine 4 mg22.80
Fesoterodine 8 mg32.77

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12.

"Number of urgency urinary incontinence episodes was measured by the 3-day micturition diary completed for 3 consecutive days during the 7 days prior to each visit.~Urgency urinary incontinence is the complaint of involuntary leakage accompanied by or immediately preceded by urgency. Urgency is the complaint of a sudden compelling desire to pass urine which is difficult to defer.~Change: mean at Week 12 minus mean at Baseline." (NCT00561951)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionUUI Episodes (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.01
Fesoterodine 4 mg-1.35
Fesoterodine 8 mg-1.40

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Each Domain Scores of King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ).

"King's Health Questionnaire(KHQ) is used to assess the impact of bladder problems on quality of life. The each domain score was calculated valued and ranged from 0 to 100, where 0=best outcome/response and 100=worst outcome/response.~Change: mean at Week 12 minus mean at Baseline." (NCT00561951)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week12

,,
Interventionscore on scale (Mean)
General Health Perceptions (n=285, 283, 283)Impact on Life (n=285, 283, 283)Role Limitations (n=285, 283, 283)Physical Limitations (n=285, 283, 283)Social Limitations (n=285, 283, 283)Personal Relationships (n=214, 210, 202)Emotions (n=285, 283, 283)Sleep/Energy (n=285, 283, 283)Incontinence Severity Measures (n=285, 283, 283)
Fesoterodine 4 mg-9.36-27.33-27.92-23.50-17.92-16.11-24.70-19.08-17.67
Fesoterodine 8 mg-6.10-25.09-25.97-25.97-18.53-9.98-24.89-18.02-18.59
Placebo-7.02-22.46-20.47-18.65-14.44-8.33-18.01-12.51-13.75

[back to top]

International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Quality of Life (QoL)

IPSS Quality of Life (QoL) is one question used to assess how the patient's symptoms affect their quality of life. A score ranges from 1 to 6, with 6 being the worse outcome. (NCT00605319)
Timeframe: screening (Month 0), 2-months, 3-months, 7-months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Time Screening Month-0Time Month-2Time Month-3Time Month-7
IPSS QoL4.23.83.53.5

[back to top]

IPSS Irritative

International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) -is a 7 point scale used to screen, track and manage symptoms associated with BPH for obstructive, irritative, nocturia. The symptoms questions include feeling of incomplete bladder emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining and nocturia. Scores range from 1 to 5 for a total of maximum 35 points (0-7 Mildly symptomatic, 8-19 Moderately symptomatic, 20-35 Severely symptomatic). This measure was taken for patients with irritative symptoms which includes frequency, urgency, nocturia and urge incontinence (NCT00605319)
Timeframe: screening (Month 0), 2-months, 3-months, 7-months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Time Screening Month-0Time Month-2Time Month-3Time Month-7
IPSS Irritative6.65.65.14.4

[back to top]

IPSS Nocturia

International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) -is a 7 point scale used to screen, track and manage symptoms associated with BPH for obstructive, irritative, nocturia. The symptoms questions include feeling of incomplete bladder emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining and nocturia. Scores range from 1 to 5 for a total of maximum 35 points (0-7 Mildly symptomatic, 8-19 Moderately symptomatic, 20-35 Severely symptomatic). This measure was taken for patients with nocturia meaning individuals who wake up during sleeping hours to urinate. (NCT00605319)
Timeframe: screening (Month 0), 2-months, 3-months, 7-months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Time Screening Month-0Time Month-2Time Month-3Time Month-7
IPSS Nocturia3.22.82.62.6

[back to top]

IPSS Obstructive

International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) -is a 7 point scale used to screen, track and manage symptoms associated with BPH for obstructive, irritative, nocturia. The symptoms questions include feeling of incomplete bladder emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining and nocturia. Scores range from 1 to 5 for a total of maximum 35 points (0-7 Mildly symptomatic, 8-19 Moderately symptomatic, 20-35 Severely symptomatic). This measure was taken for patients with obstructive symptoms which includes hesitancy or difficulty initiating the stream, straining to void, a reduced flow, an intermittent stream or a sensation of incomplete emptying. (NCT00605319)
Timeframe: screening (Month 0), 2-months, 3-months, 7-months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Time Screening Month-0Time Month-2Time Month-3Time Month-7
IPSS Obstructive9.17.58.47.9

[back to top]

Maximum Flow Rate (Qmax)

Urodynamics was used to meause maximum flow rate (Qmax) which is the maximum recorded flow rate of urinary (NCT00605319)
Timeframe: screening (Month 0), 2-months, 3-months, 7-months

InterventionmL/s (Mean)
Time Screening Month-0Time Month-2Time Month-3Time Month-7
Qmax15.310.210.610.5

[back to top]

Postvoid Residual Volume (PVR)

Postvoid residual volume (PVR) is the volume of fluid remaining in the bladder immediately after the completion of micturition. (NCT00605319)
Timeframe: screening (Month 0), 2-months, 3-months, 7-months

InterventionmL (Mean)
Time Screening Month-0Time Month-2Time Month-3Time Month-7
Post-void Residual Volume (PVR)42.933.148.255.2

[back to top]

Average Flow Rate (Qavg)

Average (mean) flow rate (Qavg) is the the volume of urine voided divided by the continuous flow time (NCT00605319)
Timeframe: screening (Month 0), 2-months, 3-months, 7-months

InterventionmL/s (Mean)
Time Screening Month-0Time Month-2Time Month-3Time Month-7
QAvgNA5.16.16.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12

UUI per 24 hours: total number of micturitions with Urinary Sensation Scale (USS) of 5 divided by total number of diary days collected at visit. USS: 5-item scale to measure urinary urgency; range: 1 (no feeling of urgency) to 5 (unable to hold; leak urine). (NCT00611026)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionepisodes per 24 hours (Mean)
Placebo-1.62
Tolterodine ER-1.74
Fesoterodine-1.95

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q): Symptom Bother Score at Week 12

Symptom bother score derived as sum of scores for questions 1-8; lowest possible raw score: 8; highest possible score: 48. Data analyzed based on transformation of the score to a 0 to 100 scale [(Actual total raw score - lowest possible value of raw score)/range]*100. Higher scores values indicative of greater symptom bother. Negative change in Symptom Bother Score indicates improvement. (NCT00611026)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-21.8
Tolterodine ER-24.3
Fesoterodine-28.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Frequency-Urgency Sum (FUS) Per 24 Hours (Synonymous With USS Sum in the Study Protocol)

Frequency-Urgency Sum per 24 hours calculated as mean rating scores on the USS multiplied by the mean number of micturitions per 24 hours at that visit. USS is 5-item scale measuring urinary urgency; range is 1 (no feeling of urgency) to 5 (unable to hold; leak urine). (NCT00611026)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12

,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 1 (n=447, 918, 906)Week 4 [LOCF] (n=453, 929, 915)Week 12 [LOCF] (n=453, 933, 915)
Fesoterodine-5.5-12.0-15.6
Placebo-4.0-8.1-12.0
Tolterodine ER-4.8-10.1-13.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours

Mean number of nocturnal micturitions per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of all micturitions divided by the total number of diary days collected at that visit. Nocturnal micturitions are those recorded in the Bedtime section of the diary. Nocturnal (Bedtime) was defined as the time the participant went to bed until he/she arose to start the next day. (NCT00611026)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12

,,
Interventionnocturnal micturitions per 24 hours (Least Squares Mean)
Week 1 (n=432, 879, 871)Week 4 [LOCF] (n=437, 888, 879)Week 12 [LOCF] (n=437, 892, 879)
Fesoterodine-0.3-0.5-0.7
Placebo-0.2-0.4-0.5
Tolterodine ER-0.3-0.5-0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Severe Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours

Mean number of severe urgency episodes (USS rating ≥4 in diary ) per 24 hours calculated as the total number of micturitions with USS ≥4 divided by total number of diary days collected at that visit. USS: 5-item scale to measure urinary urgency; range: 1 (no feeling of urgency) to 5 (unable to hold; leak urine). (NCT00611026)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12

,,
Interventionsevere urgency episodes per 24 hours (Mean)
Week 1 (n=446, 915, 902)Week 4 [LOCF] (n=452, 926, 911)Week 12 [LOCF] (n=452, 930, 911)
Fesoterodine-1.58-3.21-4.08
Placebo-1.14-2.14-3.01
Tolterodine ER-1.34-2.71-3.39

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Episodes Per 24 Hours (Urinary Sensation Scale ≥3 in the Diary)

Urgency Urinary episodes per 24 hours: total number of micturitions with Urinary Sensation Scale (USS) of ≥3 divided by total number of diary days collected at visit. USS: 5-item scale to measure urinary urgency; range: 1 (no feeling of urgency) to 5 (unable to hold; leak urine). (NCT00611026)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12

,,
Interventionepisodes per 24 hours (Least Squares Mean)
Week 1 (n=447, 918, 906)Week 4 [LOCF] (n=453, 929, 915)Week 12 [LOCF] (n=453, 933, 915)
Fesoterodine-1.2-3.1-4.2
Placebo-0.8-1.9-3.2
Tolterodine ER-1.0-2.5-3.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 1 and Week 4

UUI episodes per 24 hours calculated as total number of micturitions with Urinary Sensation Scale (USS) of 5 divided by total number of diary days collected at visit. USS is 5-item scale measuring urinary urgency; range is 1 (no feeling of urgency) to 5 (unable to hold; leak urine). (NCT00611026)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4

,,
Interventionepisodes per 24 hours (Mean)
Week 1 (n=442, 911, 899)Week 4 [LOCF] (n=448, 922, 908)
Fesoterodine-1.03-1.68
Placebo-0.80-1.31
Tolterodine ER-0.95-1.52

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Urinary Sensation Scale (USS) Rating Per Micturition Per 24 Hours.

Mean USS rating calculated as the sum of rating scores on USS per 24 hours divided by the total number of micturitions per 24 hours with non-missing rating at that visit. USS is 5-item scale measuring urinary urgency; range is 1 (no feeling of urgency) to 5 (unable to hold; leak urine). (NCT00611026)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12

,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 1 (n=447, 918, 906)Week 4 [LOCF] (n=453, 929, 915)Week 12 [LOCF] (n=453, 933, 915)
Fesoterodine-0.2-0.5-0.7
Placebo-0.2-0.3-0.6
Tolterodine ER-0.2-0.4-0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Voided Volume Per Micturition

Mean voided volume in milliliters (mL) calculated as sum of voided volume divided by the total number of micturition episodes with a recorded voided volume greater than 0 in the 3-day diary at that visit. (NCT00611026)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12

,,
InterventionmL (Mean)
Week 1 (n=447, 917, 895)Week 4 [LOCF] (n=452, 927, 909)Week 12 [LOCF] (n=452, 930, 912)
Fesoterodine18.6332.2634.47
Placebo9.8014.2717.34
Tolterodine ER15.6526.4328.43

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)

Number of participants in 4-point category: ≥2 points improvement (major improvement; negative change from baseline); 1 point improvement (minor improvement); no change; deterioration (positive change from baseline), based on PPBC score (rated on 6-point scale: 1=no problems at all; 6=many severe problems). Score change: score at observation minus score at baseline; re-scaled to 4-point categorical variables. (NCT00611026)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week, 4, Week 12

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Week 1 (n=452, 931, 913) ≥2 points improvementWeek 1: 1-point improvementWeek 1: no changeWeek 1: deteriorationWeek 4 (n=455, 937, 918) ≥2 points improvementWeek 4: 1-point improvementWeek 4: no changeWeek 4: deteriorationWeek 12 (n=455, 937, 918) ≥2 points improvementWeek 12: 1-point improvementWeek 12: no changeWeek 12: deterioration
Fesoterodine144280428613342802505444023618953
Placebo43144210551111241724816610613350
Tolterodine ER138278434812902982856437925024959

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Urgency Perception Scale (UPS). UPS Formerly Known as Patient Perception of Urgency Scale (PPUS) in the Protocol.

Number of participants in 3-point category: improvement [≥1-point improvement]; no change; deterioration [≥1-point decrease], based on UPS score (rated on 3-point scale: 1=not able to hold urine; 3=able to finish what I am doing). Score change calculated as score at observation minus score at baseline; re-scaled to 3-point categorical variables. (NCT00611026)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week, 4, Week 12

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Week 1 (n=452, 932, 913) improvementWeek 1: no changeWeek 1: deteriorationWeek 4 (n=455, 938, 918) improvementWeek 4: no changeWeek 4: deteriorationWeek 12 (n=455, 938, 918) improvementWeek 12: no changeWeek 12: deterioration
Fesoterodine267609374214673049539330
Placebo97326291612712318323933
Tolterodine ER264619493765115144045543

[back to top]

Diary Dry Rate: Percentage of Participants With no Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) in the 3-day Bladder Diary

Diary dry rate: percentage of participants with no urgency urinary incontinence episode reported in the 3 day diary at the respective time-point; based on USS: 5-item scale measuring urinary urgency; range is 1 (no feeling of urgency) to 5 (unable to hold; leak urine). (NCT00611026)
Timeframe: Week 1, Week 4, Week 12

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 1 (n=422, 911, 899)Week 4 [LOCF] (n=448, 922, 908)Week 12 [LOCF] (n=448, 926, 908)
Fesoterodine25.151.163.2
Placebo17.639.553.8
Tolterodine ER24.546.758.1

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Episodes Per 24 Hours (Urinary Sensation Scale ≥3 in the Diary)

Percent change from baseline in mean number of Urgency Urinary episodes per 24 hours (Urinary Sensation Scale ≥3 in the diary). Change calculated as UUI episodes per 24 hours at observation divided by baseline number of UUI episodes per 24 hours, multiplied by 100. (NCT00611026)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12

,,
Interventionpercent change (Median)
Week 1 (n=447, 918, 906)Week 4 [LOCF] (n=453, 929, 915)Week 12 [LOCF] (n=453, 933, 915)
Fesoterodine-11.8-32.1-45.5
Placebo-9.4-17.2-31.0
Tolterodine ER-12.0-26.3-37.5

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline of Micturitions Per 24 Hours

Percent change of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated as change in 24-hour mean at that visit divided by the baseline 24-hour mean multiplied by 100 (ie, 100%*(Week 1 or 4 or 12 - baseline)/baseline). (NCT00611026)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12

,,
Interventionpercent change (Median)
Week 1 (n=448, 921, 908)Week 4 [LOCF] (n=454, 931, 916)Week 12 [LOCF] (n=454, 935, 916)
Fesoterodine-9.0-18.9-23.5
Placebo-7.1-13.4-18.2
Tolterodine ER-9.4-16.7-20.8

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline of Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours

Percent change of nocturnal micturitions per 24 hours was calculated as change in 24-hour mean at that visit divided by the baseline 24-hour mean multiplied by 100 (ie, 100%*(Week 1 or 4 or 12 - baseline)/baseline). Nocturnal micturitions are those recorded in the Bedtime section of the diary. Nocturnal (Bedtime) was defined as the time the participant went to bed until he/she arose to start the next day. (NCT00611026)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12

,,
Interventionpercent change (Median)
Week 1 (n=432, 879, 871)Week 4 [LOCF] (n=437, 888, 879)Week 12 [LOCF] (n=437, 892, 879)
Fesoterodine-12.5-25.0-33.3
Placebo-7.7-20.0-27.3
Tolterodine ER-14.3-25.0-33.3

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline of Severe Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours

Percent change calculated as change in severe urgency episodes (USS rating ≥4 in diary ) per 24 hours at that visit divided by the baseline number of severe urgency episodes per 24 hours, multiplied by 100. USS is 5-item scale measuring urinary urgency; range is 1 (no feeling of urgency) to 5 (unable to hold; leak urine). (NCT00611026)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12

,,
Interventionpercent change (Median)
Week 1 (n=446, 915, 902)Week 4 [LOCF] (n=452, 926, 911)Week 12 [LOCF] (n=452, 930, 911)
Fesoterodine-25.0-61.1-79.3
Placebo-19.7-41.7-61.0
Tolterodine ER-24.1-55.6-69.2

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline of UUI Episodes Per 24 Hours

"UUI episodes per 24 hours calculated as total number of micturitions with USS of 5 in diary. USS is 5-item scale measuring urinary urgency; range is~1 (no feeling of urgency) to 5 (unable to hold; leak urine). Change calculated as UUI episodes per 24 hours at observation divided by baseline number of UUI episodes per 24 hours, multiplied by 100." (NCT00611026)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12

,,
Interventionpercent change (Median)
Week 1 (n=442, 911, 899)Week 4 [LOCF] (n=448, 922, 908)Week 12 [LOCF] (n=448, 926, 908)
Fesoterodine-50.0-100.0-100.0
Placebo-40.8-75.0-100.0
Tolterodine ER-50.0-88.9-100.0

[back to top]

Post-hoc Adverse Events (AEs)

An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation in which the participant was administered a product or medical device; the event does not necessarily need to have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. (NCT00611026)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 12

,
Interventionevents (Number)
ConstipationFingers tinglingFinger numbnessHypertensionDiabetes mellitusAbdominal distension and discomfortTina pedisTingling sensation/decreased sensation of fingersDyspepsiaAbdominal bloating
Fesoterodine0112211111
Tolterodine ER1000000000

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours

The mean number of micturitions was calculated as the total number of micturitions divided by the total number of diary days collected at that visit. (NCT00611026)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 12

,,
Interventionmicturitions per 24 hours (Least Squares Mean)
Week 1 (n=448, 921, 908)Week 4 [LOCF] (n=454, 931, 916)Week 12 [LOCF] (n=454, 935, 916)
Fesoterodine-1.0-2.1-2.6
Placebo-0.8-1.5-2.0
Tolterodine ER-1.0-1.8-2.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4, 8, 28 and 52

"The number of urgency episodes was measured by the 3-day micturition diary completed for 3 consecutive days during the 7 days prior to each visit.~The mean number of urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of urgency episodes for valid diary days divided by the total number of valid diary days collected at that visit.~Change: mean at Week 4, 8, 28 and 52 minus mean at Baseline" (NCT00658684)
Timeframe: Week 4, 8, 28 and 52

,,,
InterventionNumber of episodes (Mean)
Baseline (n=150, 97, 25, 28)Week 4 (n=150, 97, 25, 28)Week 8 (n=148, 95, 25, 28)Week 28 (n=137, 87, 23, 27)Week 52 (n=133, 84, 22, 27)Week 52 (LOCF) (n=150, 97, 25, 28)
4 mg3.9-1.77-2.32-2.41-2.55-2.30
4 mg > 8 mg5.1-1.37-2.70-2.46-3.37-3.40
4 mg > 8 mg > 4 mg6.2-1.75-2.59-3.12-2.80-2.93
Total4.5-1.69-2.44-2.54-2.76-2.61

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions at Week 4, 8, 28 and 52

"The number of micturitions was measured by the 3-day micturition diary completed for 3 consecutive days during the 7 days prior to each visit.~The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of micturitions for valid diary days divided by the total number of valid diary days collected at that visit.~Change: mean at Week 4, 8, 28 and 52 minus mean at Baseline" (NCT00658684)
Timeframe: Week 4, 8, 28 and 52

,,,
InterventionNumber of micturitions (Mean)
Baseline (n=150, 97, 25, 28)Week 4 (n=150, 97, 25, 28)Week 8 (n=148, 95, 25, 28)Week 28 (n=137, 87, 23, 27)Week 52 (n=133, 84, 22, 27)Week 52 (LOCF) (n=150, 97, 25, 28)
4 mg11.0-1.73-2.03-2.18-2.48-2.35
4 mg > 8 mg12.3-0.45-2.63-3.02-3.44-3.36
4 mg > 8 mg > 4 mg11.2-1.28-1.81-2.06-2.21-2.04
Total11.3-1.42-2.11-2.33-2.63-2.49

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4, 8, 28 and 52

"The number of incontinence episodes was measured by the 3-day micturition diary completed for 3 consecutive days during the 7 days prior to each visit.~The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of incontinence episodes for valid diary days divided by the total number of valid diary days collected at that visit.~Change: mean at Week 4, 8, 28 and 52 minus mean at Baseline" (NCT00658684)
Timeframe: Week 4, 8, 28 and 52

,,,
InterventionNumber of episodes (Mean)
Baseilne (n=103, 62, 17,24)Week 4 (n=103, 62, 17,24)Week 8 (n=102, 61, 17, 24)Week 28 (n= 97, 58, 16, 23)Week 52 (n=94, 56, 15, 23)Week 52 (LOCF) (n=103, 62, 17,24)
4 mg1.6-0.99-1.16-1.26-1.26-1.24
4 mg > 8 mg2.5-0.49-1.28-1.77-1.75-1.86
4 mg > 8 mg > 4 mg1.8-0.80-1.43-1.31-1.16-1.20
Total1.8-0.84-1.23-1.39-1.37-1.38

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Grade of PPBC at Week 28 and 52

"The PPBC assessment was rated on a 6-point scale as follows:~no problems at all~some very minor problems~some minor problems~some moderate problems~severe problems~many severe problems~Change: mean at Week 28 and 52 minus mean at baseline A negative change indicates improvement." (NCT00658684)
Timeframe: Week 28 and 52

,,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=150, 97, 25, 28)Week 28 (n=137, 87, 23, 27)Week 52 (n=134, 85, 22, 27)
4 mg4.2-1.74-1.85
4 mg > 8 mg4.4-1.26-1.70
4 mg > 8 mg > 4 mg4.5-1.83-1.59
Total4.3-1.66-1.78

[back to top]

The Number of Subjects Shifted in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) Responses From Baseilne to Week 28 and 52 Assessment and Its Percentage

"The number of subjects whose perception of bladder condition improved at least by one grade on PPBC from baseline at Week 28 and 52. The PPBC was rated on a 6-point scale as follows:~no problems at all~some very minor problems~some minor problems~some moderate problems~severe problems~many severe problems" (NCT00658684)
Timeframe: Week 28 and 52

,,,
InterventionNumber of subjects (Number)
Week 28 (n=137, 87, 23, 27)Week 52 (n=134, 85, 22, 27)
4 mg7575
4 mg > 8 mg1923
4 mg > 8 mg > 4 mg2118
Total115116

[back to top]

Safety Measurement Based on Adverse Events (AEs), Vital Signs, Clinical Laboratory Test, 12-lead ECG and Residual Urine Volume

The number of subjects who experienced AEs (all causality and treatment-related ) based on safety assessment during the study were summarized. The severity and seriousness of treatment-emergent AEs as well as discontinuations, dose reductions and temporary discontinuations (DR/TD) due to treatment-emergent AEs were also summarized. (NCT00658684)
Timeframe: 52 Weeks

,,,
InterventionNumber of subjects (Number)
All-causality AEsTreatment-related AEsSerious AEsSevere AEsDiscontinuations due to all-causlity AEsDiscontinuations due to treatment-related AEsDR/TD due to all-causality AEsDR/TD due to treatment-related AEs
4 mg9161108660
4 mg > 8 mg2216000010
4 mg > 8 mg > 4 mg252500212323
Total138102101073023

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 28 and 52

"OAB-q was used to assess the extent of subjects who had been botehred by selected bladder symptoms and to assess the effect on their health-related quality of life (HRQL). OAB-q consists of the symptom bother score(SBS), the HRQL total score and subscale scores (Coping, Concern, Sleep and Social). The SBS ranges from 0 to 100, where 0=minimal severity and 100=greatest severity (negative change indicates improvement). The HRQL scores range from 0 to 100, where 0=worst outcome and 100=best outcome (positive change indicates improvement).~Change: mean at Week 28 and 52 minus mean at baseline" (NCT00658684)
Timeframe: Week 28 and 52

,,,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
SBS: Baseline (n=150, 97, 25, 28)SBS: Week 28 (n=137, 87, 23, 27)SBS: Week 52 (n=134, 85, 22, 27)HRQL-Total: Baseline (n=150, 97, 25, 28)HRQL-Total: Week 28 (n=137, 87, 23, 27)HRQL-Total: Week 52 (n=134, 85, 22, 27)HRQL-Coping: Baseline (n=150, 97, 25, 28)HRQL-Coping: Week 28 (n=137, 87, 23, 27)HRQL-Coping: Week 52 (n=134, 85, 22, 27)HRQL-Concern: Baseline (n=150, 97, 25, 28)HRQL-Concern: Week 28 (n=137, 87, 23, 27)HRQL-Concern: Week 52 (n=134, 85, 22, 27)HRQL-Sleep: Baseline (n=150, 97, 25, 28)HRQL-Sleep: Week 28 (n=137, 87, 23, 27)HRQL-Sleep: Week 52 (n=134, 85, 22, 27)HRQL-Social: Baseline (n=150, 97, 25, 28)HRQ- Social: Week 28 (n=137, 87, 23, 27)HRQL-Social: Week 52 (n=134, 85, 22, 27)
4 mg37.4-22.30-22.4173.914.2615.9965.619.6620.9173.916.9519.2369.911.1313.3291.25.016.26
4 mg > 8 mg58.7-32.59-37.4158.419.8822.7645.127.0429.9159.521.0624.1355.615.8521.3381.010.8110.81
4 mg > 8 mg > 4 mg45.2-27.07-21.2572.216.0013.3564.618.1515.0072.521.2416.4965.813.2213.0990.68.006.55
Total42.7-25.13-25.2470.715.6616.9261.620.8621.7571.018.4819.7766.512.4114.9089.26.667.22

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Score of King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) at Week 28 and 52

"KHQ was used to assess the impact of bladder problems on quality of life. The scores ranged from 0 to 100, where 0=best outcome/response and 100=worst outcome/response. A negative change indicates improvement.~KHQ consists of the following domains:~General health perceptions (GHP)~Impact on life~Role limitations~Physical limitations~Social limitations~Personal relationships (PR)~Emotions~Sleep/energy~Incontinence severity measures (ISM)~Change: mean at Week 28 and 52 minus mean at Baseline" (NCT00658684)
Timeframe: Week 28 and 52

,,,
InterventionScores on a ascle (Mean)
GHP: Baseline (n=150, 97, 25, 28)GHP: Week 28 (n=137, 87, 23, 27)GHP: Week 52 (n=134, 85, 22, 27)Impact on life: Baseline (n=150, 97, 25, 28)Impact on life: Week 28 (n=137, 87, 23, 27)Impact on life: Week 52 (n=134, 85, 22, 27)Role limitations: Baseline (n=150, 97, 25, 28)Role limitations: Week 28 (n=137, 87, 23, 27)Role limitations: Week 52 (n=134, 85, 22, 27)Physical limitations: Baseline (n=150, 97, 25, 28Physical limitations: Week 28 (n=137, 87, 23, 27)Physical limitations: Week 52 (n=134, 85, 22, 27)Social limitations: Baseline (n=150, 97, 25, 28)Social limitations: Week 28 (n=137, 87, 23, 27)Social limitations: Week 52 (n=134, 85, 22, 27)PR: Baseline (n=124, 82, 18, 24)PR: Week 28 (n=110, 71, 16, 23)PR: Week 52 (n=109, 70, 16, 23)Emotions: Baseline (n=150, 97, 25, 28)Emotions: Week 28 (n=137, 87, 23, 27)Emotions: Week 52 (n=134, 85, 22, 27)Sleep/energy: Baseline (n=150, 97, 25, 28)Sleep/energy: Week 28 (n=137, 87, 23, 27)Sleep/energy: Week 52 (n=134, 85, 22, 27)ISM: Baseline (n=150, 97, 25, 28)ISM: Week 28 (n=137, 87, 23, 27)ISM: Week 52 (n=134, 85, 22, 27)
4 mg37.1-0.57-5.8861.2-32.18-32.9446.0-28.16-30.9849.8-26.63-32.1627.5-17.37-20.7217.3-11.74-13.5749.1-27.84-32.4233.2-17.43-20.5932.6-14.87-18.43
4 mg > 8 mg39.3-9.26-2.7870.2-30.86-34.5750.6-23.46-25.3157.1-25.93-25.3139.3-24.28-25.5129.2-19.57-19.5757.5-26.34-26.7550.0-22.84-27.7845.7-20.25-24.44
4 mg > 8 mg > 4 mg37.00.00-5.6868.0-37.68-31.8252.0-33.33-31.0654.0-31.16-28.0331.1-22.71-24.7516.7-10.42-12.5052.0-27.54-26.2637.3-18.12-15.9131.5-16.81-14.55
Total37.5-2.19-5.2264.0-32.85-33.0847.9-28.10-29.8551.9-27.25-30.1030.3-19.63-22.3519.5-13.18-14.6851.2-27.49-30.2737.0-18.61-21.2734.8-16.25-19.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of Nighttime Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4, 8, 28 and 52

"The number of nighttime micturitions was measured by the 3-day micturition diary completed for 3 consecutive days during the 7 days prior to each visit.~The mean number of nighttime micturitions per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of nighttime micturitions for valid diary days divided by the total number of valid diary days collected at that visit.~Change: mean at Week 4, 8, 28 and 52 minus mean at Baseline" (NCT00658684)
Timeframe: Week 4, 8, 28 and 52

,,,
InterventionNumber of micturitions (Mean)
Baseline (n=116, 69, 23, 24)Week 4 (n=116, 69, 23, 24)Week 8 (n=115, 68, 23, 24)Week 28 (n=106, 62, 21, 23)Week 52 (n=103, 60, 20, 23)Week 52 (LOCF) (n=116, 69, 23, 24)
4 mg1.2-0.34-0.33-0.36-0.46-0.38
4 mg > 8 mg1.6-0.08-0.60-0.71-0.75-0.71
4 mg > 8 mg > 4 mg1.6-0.45-0.55-0.56-0.68-0.62
Total1.4-0.31-0.43-0.47-0.57-0.50

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Voided Volume Per Micturition at Week 4, 8, 28 and 52

"Voided volume per micturition was measured by the 3-day micturition diary completed for 3 consecutive days during the 7 days prior to each visit.~The mean voided volume per micturitions was calculated as the total voided volume for valid diary days divided by the total number of valid diary days collected at that visit.~Change: mean at Week 4, 8, 28 and 52 minus mean at Baseline" (NCT00658684)
Timeframe: Week 4, 8, 28 and 52

,,,
InterventionmL (Mean)
Baseline (n=150, 97, 25, 28)Week 4 (n=150, 97, 25, 28)Week 8 (n=148, 95, 25, 28)Week 28 (n=137, 87, 23, 27)Week 52 (n=133, 84, 22, 27)Week 52 (LOCF) (n=150, 97, 25, 28)
4 mg162.820.5821.8631.9840.2137.08
4 mg > 8 mg143.67.1623.3728.1024.9525.38
4 mg > 8 mg > 4 mg156.112.1823.0040.2033.0228.22
Total158.116.6722.3432.5935.9233.42

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4, 8, 28 and 52

"The number of UUI episodes was measured by the 3-day micturition diary completed for 3 consecutive days during the 7 days prior to each visit.~The mean number of UUI episodes per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of UUI episodes for valid diary days divided by the total number of valid diary days collected at that visit.~Change: mean at Week 4, 8, 28 and 52 minus mean at Baseline" (NCT00658684)
Timeframe: Week 4, 8, 28 and 52

,,,
InterventionNumber of episodes (Mean)
Baseline (n=101, 60, 17, 24)Week 4 (n=101, 60, 17, 24)Week 8 (n=100, 59, 17, 24)Week 28 (n=95, 56, 16, 23)Week 52 (n= 92, 54, 15, 23)Week 52 (LOCF) (n=101, 60, 17, 24)
4 mg1.4-0.99-1.16-1.24-1.23-1.19
4 mg > 8 mg2.1-0.63-1.00-1.41-1.71-1.82
4 mg > 8 mg > 4 mg1.7-0.73-1.31-1.25-1.18-1.22
Total1.6-0.86-1.15-1.28-1.34-1.35

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Scores of OAB-q at Visit 4

Symptom severity/bother score: sub-section of the OAB-q consists of 8 questions. Each item assessed on ordinal scale (0=Not at all to 5=a very great deal). Score=sum of scores for items 1 to 8 and a further 2 points were added if subject was male. Lowest possible score=0 and highest=42. Data were transformed onto a 0 to 100 scale and analyzed based on the transformed score: Transformed Symptom Bother Score=[(Actual Total Raw Score minus Lowest possible value of raw score) divided by Range] multiplied by 100. Higher scores=greater symptom severity or bother and lower=minimal symptom severity. (NCT00691093)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 or ET

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Fesoterodine 4 mg-34.101
Fesoterodine 8 mg-34.318
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of Efficacy-32.018

[back to top] [back to top]

Time To Onset Of Treatment Response

Participant's perception of treatment response assessment since the previous visit was noted at each visit. Time to onset of response was calculated in weeks from start of treatment. (NCT00691093)
Timeframe: Month 1, Month 2, Month 3 or ET

Interventionweeks (Median)
Fesoterodine 4 mg3.0
Fesoterodine 8 mg3.0
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of Efficacy3.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Each Visit

Micturition frequency: mean number of 'day time' (i.e., the time the participant was awake) micturitions per 24 hours and calculated as the total number of 'day time' urinations, divided by the total diary days collected at that visit. (NCT00691093)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3 or Early Termination (ET)

,,
Interventionepisodes (Mean)
BaselineVisit 2 (Month 1)Visit 3 (Month 2)Visit 4 (Month 3 or ET)
Fesoterodine 4 mg11.661-2.306-3.482-4.180
Fesoterodine 8 mg10.636-2.303-2.848-4.000
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of Efficacy12.664-1.566-3.160-4.031

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturition Frequency Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4

Nocturnal frequency: mean number of 'night time' (the time the participant was asleep and the urge to urinate woke him/her up) micturitions and calculated as the total number of 'night time' urinations, divided by the total diary days collected at that visit. (NCT00691093)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3 or ET

,,
Interventionepisodes (Mean)
BaselineVisit 2 (Month 1)Visit 3 (Month 2)Visit 4 (Month 3 or ET)
Fesoterodine 4 mg3.027-1.104-1.621-1.914
Fesoterodine 8 mg4.000-1.212-1.848-2.030
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of Efficacy3.528-0.915-1.613-2.072

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Urine Volume at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4

The PVR urine volume: measured by an ultrasound scan. (NCT00691093)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3 or ET

,,
Interventionml (Mean)
BaselineVisit 2 (Month 1)Visit 3 (Month 2)Visit 4 (Month 3 or ET)
Fesoterodine 4 mg27.932-6.650-9.864-12.800
Fesoterodine 8 mg42.000-12.800-18.700-21.000
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of Efficacy24.867-2.364-5.791-7.415

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4

The mean number of UUI episodes: total number of UUI episodes, divided by the total diary days collected at that visit. (NCT00691093)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3 or ET

,,
Interventionepisodes (Mean)
BaselineVisit 2 (Month 1)Visit 3 (Month 2)Visit 4 (Month 3 or ET)
Fesoterodine 4 mg2.601-1.209-1.806-2.065
Fesoterodine 8 mg2.933-1.067-1.583-1.733
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of Efficacy3.467-1.190-1.781-2.362

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Urgency Episode Frequency (UEF) Per 24 Hours at Visit 2, Visit 3, and Visit 4

UEF: mean number of micturition related urgency episodes per 24 hours and calculated as the total number of 'urgency' urinations (i.e., sudden urges to urinate and problems to delay micturition) divided by 3 (or if data for 3 days were not available, over the total number of diary days collected at that visit). (NCT00691093)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3 or ET

,,
Interventionepisodes (Mean)
BaselineVisit 2 (Month 1)Visit 3 (Month 2)Visit 4 (Month 3 or ET)
Fesoterodine 4 mg4.412-1.890-2.736-3.127
Fesoterodine 8 mg4.697-1.697-2.182-2.636
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of Efficacy5.587-1.650-2.895-3.814

[back to top]

Clinical Global Evaluation of Fesoterodine

Clinical global evaluation of study medication was assessed via the question 'how would you rate the study medication the patient received for overactive bladder?,' and was assessed on the four point categorical scale, ranging from 'Poor' to 'Excellent.' (NCT00691093)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
ExcellentGoodFairPoorMissing
All Subjects5132742493

[back to top]

Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q): Symptom Severity/Bother Scale

Symptom severity/bother score: sub-section of the OAB-q consists of 8 questions. Each item assessed on ordinal scale (0=Not at all to 5=a very great deal). Score=sum of scores for items 1 to 8 and a further 2 points were added if subject was male. Lowest possible score=0 and highest=42. Data were transformed onto a 0 to 100 scale and analyzed based on the transformed score: Transformed Symptom Bother Score=[(Actual Total Raw Score minus Lowest possible value of raw score) divided by Range] multiplied by 100. Higher scores=greater symptom severity or bother and lower=minimal symptom severity. (NCT00691093)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 or ET

,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineVisit 4 (Month 3 or ET)
Fesoterodine 4 mg59.26325.147
Fesoterodine 8 mg70.00035.682
Increase of Dose From 4 mg to 8 mg Due to Lack of Efficacy64.73732.719

[back to top]

Patient's Global Evaluation of Fesoterodine

The patients global evaluation of study medication was assessed via the question 'how would you rate your overall response to the study medication?' and was assessed on the four point categorical scale, ranging from 'Poor' to 'Excellent'. (NCT00691093)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3 or ET

Interventionparticipants (Number)
ExcellentGoodFairPoorMissing
All Subjects53625222103

[back to top]

Reasons for Study Treatment Dose Changes

Possible change in the dose and the reasons for the change were collected and documented. (NCT00691093)
Timeframe: Month 3 or ET

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Inefectivity, Not Sufficient EffectivityInfectivityInsufficient (efficiency) effectInsufficient responsePoor overall responseMissing
All Subjects22291114

[back to top]

Study Doses

Number of subjects that changed doses throughout the study period. (NCT00691093)
Timeframe: Month 3 or ET

Interventionparticipants (Number)
IncreasedStayed the sameDecreasedFluctuated
All Subjects5776600

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Nocturnal micturitions defined as micturitions with USS rating 1-5 that occurred between time participant went to bed and time he or she arose to start the next day. USS rating: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. Change = observation minus baseline, where lower scores were an improvement/decrease in nocturnal micturitions. (NCT00798434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

,
InterventionPercent change (Median)
Change at Week 4 (n=366, 356)Change at Week 8 (n=349, 331)Change at Week 12 (n=359, 338)
Fesoterodine-0.3-0.7-0.7
Placebo-0.3-0.3-0.3

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Incontinent at Baseline and Became Dry

Percentage of participants who had at least 1 UUI episode during baseline period and were dry (no UUI episodes) in the 3 days prior to study visits at week 8 and 12. UUI episodes defined as those with USS rating of 5 (unable to hold; leak urine) in the diary. (NCT00798434)
Timeframe: Weeks 8 to 12

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo45.0
Fesoterodine53.2

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline of UUI Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, and 12

UUI episodes defined as those with the USS rating of 5 (unable to hold; leak urine)in the diary. Change = observation minus baseline, where lower scores were an improvement/decrease in UUI episodes. (NCT00798434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

,
InterventionPercent change (Median)
Change at Week 4 (n=365, 356)Change at Week 8 (n=349, 331)Change at Week 12 (n=356, 338)
Fesoterodine0.00.00.0
Placebo0.00.00.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 24

Micturitions include episodes of voluntary micturition and episodes of UUI. UUI episodes defined as those micturitions with USS rating of 5 (unable to hold; leak urine) in the diary in participants with UUI at baseline. Change = observation minus baseline, where lower scores were an improvement/decrease in micturitions. (NCT00798434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

InterventionMicturitions per 24 hours (Mean)
Placebo/Fesoterodine-2.28
Fesoterodine/Fesoterodine-2.36

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of UUI Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 24

UUI episodes defined as those with USS rating of 5 (unable to hold; leak urine) in the diary. Change = observation minus baseline, where lower scores were an improvement/decrease in UUI episodes. (NCT00798434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

InterventionEpisodes per 24 hours (Median)
Placebo/Fesoterodine0.0
Fesoterodine/Fesoterodine0.0

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 24

Nocturnal micturitions were defined as micturitions with USS rating 1-5 that occurred between the time the participant went to bed and the time he or she arose to start the next day. USS rating: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. Calculated as number of nocturnal micturitions divided by number of diary days collected at that visit. Change = observation minus baseline, where lower scores were an improvement/decrease in nocturnal micturitions. (NCT00798434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

InterventionMicturitions per 24 hours (Mean)
Placebo/Fesoterodine-0.60
Fesoterodine/Fesoterodine-0.67

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Improvement at Week 12

"Patient Treatment Benefit Scale (PTBS): single-item scale assessed fesoterodine efficacy and safety in participants with overactive bladder. Participants asked to compare their present condition with their condition before start of trial: My condition has been: 1=Greatly Improved; 2=Improved; 3=Not Changed; 4=Worsened, During Treatment. Improvement was defined as a rating of 1 or 2." (NCT00798434)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo42.9
Fesoterodine67.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Daily Sum Rating in USS at Weeks 4, 8, and 12

USS total range 1 to 5 (1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine). Change = observation minus baseline, where lower scores were an improvement/decrease in urinary sensation. (NCT00798434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=381, 374)Change at Week 4 (n=365, 356)Change at Week 8 (n=349, 331)Change at Week 12 (n=356, 338)
Fesoterodine36.07-8.52-10.81-11.59
Placebo37.55-4.35-6.53-7.33

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EQ-5D- Health State Profile Utility Score at Week 12

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess HRQL in terms of single index value. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) component rated current health state on scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). For each question, scores categorized into 3 levels of response, level 1=no health problems, 2=some problems and 3= extreme problems, and health state profile utility score derived from these, which could range from 1 prefect health to -0.594 worst possible health. Change = observation minus baseline, where higher scores indicated a better health state. (NCT00798434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=381, 373)Change at Week 12 (n=362, 346)
Fesoterodine0.80920.0064
Placebo0.78250.0230

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Scores at Week 12

KHQ: self-administered questionnaire contained 21 questions scored in 9 domains (general health perception, incontinence impact, role limitations, physical limitations, social limitations, personal relationships, emotions, sleep/energy, severity of urinary symptoms). Range: 0-100, where 0=best outcome/response and 100=worst outcome/response. Change = observation minus baseline, where lower scores indicated better outcome/response. (NCT00798434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Baseline General Health Perception (n=23, 32)Change at Week 12 General Hlth Perception n=21, 29Baseline Incontinence Impact (n=23, 32)Change at Week 12 Incontinence Impact (n=21, 29)Baseline Role Limitations (n=22, 32)Change at Week 12 Role Limitations (n=20, 29)Baseline Physical Limitations (n=22, 32)Change at Week 12 Physical Limitations (n=20, 29)Baseline Social Limitations (n=22, 32)Change at Week 12 Social Limitations (n=20, 29)Baseline Personal Relationships (n=16,17)Change at Week 12 Personal Relationship (n=11, 14)Baseline Emotions (n=22, 32)Change at Week 12 Emotions (n=20, 29)Baseline Sleep/Energy (n=22, 32)Change at Week 12 Sleep/Energy (n=20, 29)Baseline Severity USS (n=22, 32)Change at Week 12 Severity USS (n=20, 29)
Fesoterodine25.002.5973.96-16.0946.35-12.6444.79-13.7929.86-8.6219.61-5.9532.64-6.5157.29-11.4944.38-8.51
Placebo35.87-2.3875.36-12.7048.48-10.8350.76-13.3324.75-7.5015.634.5532.32-2.7846.97-8.3343.94-2.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Micturitions included episodes of voluntary micturition and episodes of UUI, defined as those micturitions with USS rating of 5 (unable to hold; leak urine) in the diary of participants with UUI at baseline. Change = observation minus baseline, where lower scores were an improvement/decrease in micturitions. (NCT00798434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

,
InterventionMicturitions per 24 hours (Mean)
Baseline (n=382, 374)Change at Week 4 (n=366, 356)Change at Week 8 (n=349, 331)Change at Week 12 (n=359, 338)
Fesoterodine11.89-1.47-1.95-2.09
Placebo12.10-0.69-1.11-1.15

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) at Week 12

MMSE measured general cognitive functioning: orientation, memory, attention, calculation, language, visuospatial functions. Total score derived from sub-scores; total ranged from 0 - 30, higher score indicated better cognitive state. Change = observation minus baseline where higher scores indicated better cognitive functioning. (NCT00798434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 12
Fesoterodine28.200.24
Placebo28.090.23

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Nocturnal micturitions defined as micturitions with USS rating 1-5 that occurred between time participant went to bed and time he or she arose to start the next day. USS rating: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. Calculated as number of nocturnal micturitions divided by number of diary days collected at that visit. Change = observation minus baseline, where lower scores were an improvement/decrease in nocturnal micturitions. (NCT00798434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

,
InterventionMicturitions per 24 hours (Mean)
Baseline (n=382, 374)Change at Week 4 (n=366, 356)Change at Week 8 (n=349, 331)Change at Week 12 (n=359, 338)
Fesoterodine2.80-0.38-0.51-0.55
Placebo2.92-0.22-0.30-0.33

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of Skin Protective Agents Used by Participants at Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Skin protective agents included incontinence pads, barrier creams, and powders. Change = observation minus baseline, where lower scores were an improvement/decrease in protective skin agents used. (NCT00798434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

,
InterventionSkin protective agents (Mean)
Incontinence pads at Baseline (n=374, 369)Incontinence pads Change at Week 4 (n=360, 350)Incontinence pads Change at Week 8 (n=342, 326)Incontinence pads Change at Week 12 (n=350, 332)Creams at Baseline (n=374, 368)Creams Change at Week 4 (n=360, 349)Creams Change at Week 8 (n=342, 325)Creams Change at Week 12 (n=350, 331)Powder at Baseline (n=374, 368)Powder Change at Week 4 (n=360, 349)Powder Change at Week 8 (n=342, 325)Powder Change at Week 12 (n=350, 331)
Fesoterodine1.35-0.27-0.38-0.500.16-0.02-0.03-0.030.02-0.02-0.01-0.02
Placebo1.49-0.20-0.15-0.160.12-0.010.060.040.030.030.030.03

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, and 12

UUI episodes defined as those with USS rating of 5 (unable to hold; leak urine) in the diary. Change = observation minus baseline, where lower scores were an improvement/decrease in UUI episodes. (NCT00798434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

,
InterventionEpisodes per 24 hours (Median)
Baseline (n=381, 374)Change at Week 4 (n=365, 356)Change at Week 8 (n=349, 331)Change at Week 12 (n=356, 338)
Fesoterodine0.00.00.00.0
Placebo0.00.00.00.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in OAB-q Subscale Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24

OAB-q: self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire assessed how much participant bothered by bladder symptoms during previous week. Each item rated by participant on Likert scale 1 (least symptom bother) to 6 (most symptom bother). Raw scores transformed to 0-100 score where higher scores were less favorable outcome. Questions 1-8 constituted symptom severity/bother score. Questions 9-33 constitute HRQL component, which included domains of coping, concern, sleep, and social function. Change = observation minus baseline and higher scores were an improvement. (NCT00798434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Coping at Baseline (n=380, 374)Coping Change at Week 4 (n=368, 358)Coping Change at Week 8 (n=348, 329)Coping Change at Week 12 (n=365, 358)Coping Change at Week 24Concern at Baseline (n=380, 374)Concern Change at Week 4 (n=368, 358)Concern Change at Week 8 (n=348, 329)Concern Change at Week 12 (n=365, 358)Concern Change at Week 24Sleep at Baseline (n=380, 374)Sleep Change at Week 4 (n=368, 358)Sleep Change at Week 8 (n=348, 329)Sleep Change at Week 12 (n=365, 358)Sleep Change at Week 24Social at Baseline (n=380, 374)Social Change at Week 4 (n=368, 355)Social Change at Week 8 (n=349, 328)Social Change at Week 12 (n=364, 357)Social Change at Week 24
Fesoterodine/Fesoterodine58.3111.9014.9815.65NA64.6711.8815.3915.48NA57.529.0710.8711.99NA81.026.258.177.02NA
Placebo/Fesoterodine57.528.3510.4610.60NA62.107.9610.8811.25NA53.797.319.019.36NA79.104.415.845.29NA

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Satisfaction Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom/Bother Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24

OAB-q: self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire assessed how much participant was bothered by selected bladder symptoms during previous week. Each item rated by participant on Likert scale 1 (least symptom bother) to 6 (most symptom bother). Raw scores transformed to a score from 0-100 where higher scores represented less favorable outcome. Change = baseline minus observation and higher scores were an improvement. (NCT00798434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=381, 373)Change at Week 4 (n=369, 358)Change at Week 8 (n=349, 328)Change at Week 12 (n=366, 357)Change at Week 24
Fesoterodine/Fesoterodine50.58-14.05-18.03-18.37NA
Placebo/Fesoterodine52.90-9.03-12.86-12.16NA

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Satisfaction Questionnaire (OAB-q) Total Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24

OAB-q: self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire assessed how much participant was bothered by selected bladder symptoms during previous week. Each item rated by participant on Likert scale 1 (least symptom bother) to 6 (most symptom bother). Raw scores transformed to a score from 0-100 where higher scores represented less favorable outcome. Change = observation minus baseline and higher scores were an improvement. (NCT00798434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=373, 379)Change at Week 4 (n=367, 354)Change at Week 8 (n=348, 328)Change at Week 12 (n=363, 357)Change at Week 24
Fesoterodine/Fesoterodine64.4210.2412.9613.19NA
Placebo/Fesoterodine62.457.289.369.56NA

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4

PPBC: self-administered, single-item, questionnaire that asked participants to describe their perception of their bladder-related problems. PPBC assessment rated on a 6-point scale: 1=no problems at all, 2=some very minor problems, 3=some minor problems, 4=moderate problems, 5=severe problems, 6=many severe problems. Change = observation minus baseline. Results categorized as Deterioration (score difference ≥1), No Change (score difference=0), Improvement (score difference less than [<]0). (NCT00798434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
ImprovementNo ChangeDeterioration
Fesoterodine19216816
Placebo16820240

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in PPBC at Week 12

PPBC: self-administered, single-item, questionnaire that asked participants to describe their perception of their bladder-related problems. PPBC assessment rated on a 6-point scale: 1=no problems at all, 2=some very minor problems, 3=some minor problems, 4=moderate problems, 5=severe problems, 6=many severe problems. Change = observation minus baseline. Results categorized as Deterioration (score difference ≥1), No Change (score difference=0), Improvement (score difference <0). (NCT00798434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
ImprovementNo ChangeDeterioration
Fesoterodine25610417
Placebo20416433

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in PPBC at Week 8

PPBC: self-administered, single-item, questionnaire that asked participants to describe their perception of their bladder-related problems. PPBC assessment rated on a 6-point scale: 1=no problems at all, 2=some very minor problems, 3=some minor problems, 4=moderate problems, 5=severe problems, 6=many severe problems. Change = observation minus baseline. Results categorized as Deterioration (score difference ≥1), No Change (score difference=0), Improvement (score difference <0). (NCT00798434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
ImprovementNo ChangeDeterioration
Fesoterodine21011913
Placebo18516622

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in PPUS at Week 12

PPUS: self-administered, single-item, questionnaire that measured the participant's perception of urinary urgency. It was sensitive to changes in perceptions of urinary urgency over time. Scale of 0 (usually not able to hold urine), 1 (usually able to hold urine [without leaking] until reaching toilet if go to toilet immediately), or 2 (usually able to finish what he/she was doing before going to toilet [without leaking]). Change = observation minus baseline. Improvement in PPUS defined as increase of 1 or more points in difference of scores relative to baseline. (NCT00798434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
ImprovementNo ChangeDeterioration
Fesoterodine13320028
Placebo10922632

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in PPUS at Week 8

PPUS: self-administered, single-item, questionnaire that measured the participant's perception of urinary urgency. It was sensitive to changes in perceptions of urinary urgency over time. Scale of 0 (usually not able to hold urine), 1 (usually able to hold urine [without leaking] until reaching toilet if go to toilet immediately), or 2 (usually able to finish what he/she was doing before going to toilet [without leaking]). Change = observation minus baseline. Improvement in PPUS defined as increase of 1 or more points in difference of scores relative to baseline. (NCT00798434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
ImprovementNo ChangeDeterioration
Fesoterodine11119425
Placebo9522432

[back to top]

Change From Baseline Patient Perception of Urgency Scale (PPUS) at Week 4

PPUS: self-administered, single-item, questionnaire that measured the participant's perception of urinary urgency. It was sensitive to changes in perceptions of urinary urgency over time. Scale of 0 (usually not able to hold urine), 1 (usually able to hold urine [without leaking] until reaching toilet if go to toilet immediately), or 2 (usually able to finish what he/she was doing before going to toilet [without leaking]). Change = observation minus baseline. Improvement in PPUS defined as increase of 1 or more points in difference of scores relative to baseline. (NCT00798434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
ImprovementNo ChangeDeterioration
Fesoterodine9025021
Placebo7426333

[back to top]

Change From Week 12 in OAB-S Scale for OAB Medication Expectation at Week 24

OAB-S: evaluated OAB medication expectations, daily life with OAB, and satisfaction with OAB medication. Included 3 stand-alone items that assessed overall expectation, satisfaction, and willingness to continue treatment. Medication expectation coded on scale 1=Greatly exceeds my expectations to 5=Does not meet my expectations at all. Coding reversed by subtracting initial response value from 6, so higher final response value associated with better fulfilment of OAB medication expectations. (NCT00798434)
Timeframe: Weeks 12 and 24

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Week 12Change at Week 24
Fesoterodine/Fesoterodine2.850.17
Placebo/Fesoterodine2.210.74

[back to top]

Change From Week 12 in Overactive Bladder Satisfaction (OAB-S) Scale for Satisfaction With OAB Control at Week 24

OAB-S: validated self-administered instrument that evaluated OAB medication expectations, daily life with OAB, and satisfaction with OAB medication and included 3 stand-alone items that assessed overall expectation, satisfaction, and willingness to continue treatment. Satisfaction coded on scale of 1-5: (1-very satisfied to 5-very dissatisfied). Coding reversed algorithmically and results transformed: total score range 0-100. Higher final response value associated with better satisfaction. Change = score at Week 24 minus score at Week 12 where higher scores indicated better satisfaction. (NCT00798434)
Timeframe: Weeks 12 and 24

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Week 12Change at Week 24
Fesoterodine/Fesoterodine63.013.58
Placebo/Fesoterodine44.9721.22

[back to top] [back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Micturitions included episodes of voluntary micturition and episodes of UUI. Change = observation minus baseline, where lower scores were an improvement/decrease in micturitions. (NCT00798434)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

,
InterventionPercent change (Median)
Change at Week 4 (n=366, 356)Change at Week 8 (n=349, 331)Change at Week 12 (n=359, 338)
Fesoterodine-1.3-1.7-2.0
Placebo-0.7-1.0-1.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Scores at Week 12

KHQ: Self-administered questionnaire containing 21 questions scored in 9 domains (general health perception, incontinence impact, role limitations, physical limitations, social limitations, personal relationships, emotions, sleep/energy, severity of urinary symptoms). Each domain was a categorical scale that was converted to a numeric score. All domains transformed to a range of 0 to 100, where 0=best outcome/response and 100=worst outcome/response. Change=mean score at Week 12 minus mean score at baseline, negative change from baseline=improvement. (NCT00806494)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

InterventionScore on Scale (Mean)
General Health Perception (n=311)Incontinence Impact (n=309)Role Limitations (n=311)Physical Limitations (n=311)Social Limitations (n=310)Personal Relationships (n=220)Emotions (n=308)Sleep/Energy (n=311)Severity of Urinary Symptoms (n=311)
Fesoterodine-2.57-29.69-41.16-36.60-25.22-15.23-25.78-21.38-21.92

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Incontinence Pads Used Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4 and 12

The mean number of incontinence pads used per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of incontinence pads used divided by the total number of diary days collected at that visit. Change=mean at observation minus mean at baseline. Negative change, ie, decrease in number of incontinence pads used relative to baseline=improvement. (NCT00806494)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 12

InterventionNumber of Incontinence Pads (Mean)
Week 4 (n=304)Week 12 (n=316)
Fesoterodine-0.49-0.64

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4 and 12

Nocturnal micturitions were defined as those occurring between the time the subject went to bed and the time he or she arose to start the next day. The mean number of nocturnal micturitions per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of nocturnal micturitions divided by the total number of diary days collected at that visit. Change=mean at observation minus mean at baseline. Negative change, ie, decrease in number of nocturnal micturitions relative to baseline=improvement. (NCT00806494)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 12

InterventionNumber of episodes (Mean)
Week 4 (n=297)Week 12 (n=309)
Fesoterodine-0.61-0.78

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Urgency Episodes (NUEs) Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4 and 12

"NUEs were defined as those with a USS rating of >=3 in the diary, occurring between the time the participant goes to bed and the time he/she arises to start the next day. USS: 5-item scale to measure urinary urgency; range: 1 (no feeling of urgency) to 5 (unable to hold; leak urine).~Mean number of NUEs per 24 hours was calculated as total number of NUEs divided by total number of diary days collected at that visit. Change=mean at observation minus mean at baseline. Negative change, ie, decrease in number of NUEs relative to baseline=improvement." (NCT00806494)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 12

InterventionNumber of Episodes (Mean)
Week 4 (n=284)Week 12 (n=297)
Fesoterodine-0.95-1.16

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score at Weeks 4 and 12

OAB-q symptom bother scale (8 items) is part of the OAB-q. Symptom bother score=sum of scores for items 1 to 8 (each symptom bother item measured on 6-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 6 (a very great deal). Lowest possible raw score=8; highest possible score=48. Data analyzed based on transformation of score to a 0 to 100 scale: (Actual total raw score - lowest possible value of raw score)/raw score range * 100. 0=no symptom bother, 100=high symptom bother. Change=mean score at observation minus mean score at baseline, negative change in score=improvement. (NCT00806494)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 12

InterventionScore on Scale (Mean)
Week 4 (n=300)Week 12 (n=319)
Fesoteridine-27.95-37.25

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Weeks 4 and 12

PPBC: self-administered, single-item, questionnaire to describe perception of participants bladder-related problems (rated on 6-point scale: 1=no problems at all, 2=some very minor, 3=some minor, 4=some moderate, 5=severe, 6=many severe problems). Score change=score at observation minus score at baseline; re-scaled to 4-point categorical variables (major improvement [score difference <=-2]; minor improvement [score difference =-1]; no change [score difference = 0]; deterioration [score difference >=1]), based on PPBC score. (NCT00806494)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Major Improvement (Week 4), n=307Minor Improvement (Week 4), n=307No Change (Week 4), n=307Deterioration (Week 4), n=307Major Improvement (Week 12), n=322Minor Improvement (Week 12), n=322No Change (Week 12), n=322Deterioration (Week 12), n=322
Fesoterodine8612193716094644

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) at Weeks 4 and 12

UPS: self-administered, single-item questionnaire to measure participant's perception of urinary urgency (rated on 3-point scale: 1=usually not able to hold urine; 3=usually able to finish what I am doing before going to toilet without leaking). Score change=score at observation minus score at baseline; re-scaled to 3-point categorical variables (improvement [Increase of 1 or more points in difference of scores]; no change [score difference=0]; deterioration [Negative difference of scores], based on UPS score, with number of participants in each of the 3-point categories. (NCT00806494)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Improvement (Week 4), n=307No Change (Week 4), n=307Deterioration (Week 4), n=307Improvement (Week 12), n=321No Change (Week 12), n=321Deterioration (Week 12), n=321
Fesoterodine105189131541598

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Each Categorical Response at Week 12 for Benefit, Satisfaction and Willingness to Continue (BSW) Questionnaire

BSW: 3-item questionnaire to assess participants perception of effect of treatment in terms of treatment benefit, satisfaction with treatment, and participants willingness to continue treatment. Response to each item recorded in dichotomous fashion (Benefit: yes/no, yes - little benefit/much benefit; Satisfaction: yes/no, yes - a little satisfied/very satisfied, no - a little dissatisfied/very dissatisfied; Willingness to continue: yes/no, yes - a little bit willing/very willing, no - a little unwilling/very unwilling). (NCT00806494)
Timeframe: Week 12 (or Early Withdrawal)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Benefit from Treatment - Much BenefitBenefit from Treatment - Little BenefitBenefit from Treatment - NoSatisfied with Treatment - YesSatisfied with Treatment - NoSatisfied with Treatment - Yes (Very Satisfied)Satisfied with Treatment - Yes (Little Satisfied)Satisfied with Treatment - No(Little Dissatisfied)Satisfied with Treatment - No (Very Dissatisfied)Willingness to Continue - YesWillingness to Continue - NoWillingness to Continue - Yes (Very Willing)Willingness to Continue - Yes (Little Bit Willing)Willingness to Continue - No (Little Unwilling)Willingness to Continue - No (Very Unwilling)
Fesoterodine18882362535418469302424861203452336

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4 and 12

Percentage change from baseline in nocturnal micturitions was calculated as change in mean number of nocturnal micturitions per 24 hours at that visit divided by the baseline mean number of nocturnal micturitions per 24 hours, multiplied by 100. (NCT00806494)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 12

InterventionPercentage Change (Mean)
Week 4 (n=297)Week 12 (n=309)
Fesoterodine-15.18-23.35

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in NUEs Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4 and 12

Percentage change from baseline in NUEs was calculated as change in mean number of NUEs per 24 hours at that visit divided by the baseline mean number of NUEs per 24 hours, multiplied by 100. (NCT00806494)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 12

InterventionPercentage Change (Mean)
Week 4 (n=284)Week 12 (n=297)
Fesoterodine-38.71-44.78

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4

The number of micturitions was measured by the 3-day bladder diary completed for the 3 consecutive days preceding each clinic visit. The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated as the sum of all micturitions recorded in the diary divided by the number of days the diary was completed at that visit. Change=mean at observation minus mean at baseline. Negative change, ie, decrease in number of micturitions relative to baseline=improvement. (NCT00806494)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4

InterventionNumber of Episodes (Mean)
Fesoterodine-2.55

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in SUEs Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4 and 12

Percentage change from baseline in SUEs was calculated as the change in mean number of SUEs per 24 hours at that visit divided by the baseline mean number of SUEs per 24 hours, multiplied by 100. (NCT00806494)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 12

InterventionPercentage Change (Mean)
Week 4 (n=268)Week 12 (n=278)
Fesoterodine-57.37-69.14

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 12

The number of micturitions was measured by the 3-day bladder diary completed for the 3 consecutive days preceding each clinic visit. The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated as the sum of all micturitions recorded in the diary divided by the number of days the diary was completed at that visit. Change=mean at observation minus mean at baseline. Negative change, more specifically (ie), a decrease in number of micturitions relative to baseline=improvement. (NCT00806494)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

InterventionNumber of Episodes (Mean)
Fesoterodine-3.26

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in UUI Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4 and 12

Percentage change from baseline in UUI episodes was calculated as change in mean number of UUI episodes per 24 hours at that visit divided by the baseline mean number of episodes per 24 hours, multiplied by 100. (NCT00806494)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 12

InterventionPercentage Change (Mean)
Week 4 (n=125)Week 12 (n=127)
Fesoterodine-59.11-79.30

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4 and 12

Percentage change from baseline in urgency episodes was calculated as change in mean number of urgency episodes per 24 hours at that visit divided by the baseline mean number of urgency episodes per 24 hours, multiplied by 100. (NCT00806494)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 12

InterventionPercentage Change (Mean)
Week 4 (n=303)Week 12 (n=317)
Fesoterodine-40.69-51.75

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4 and 12

"UUI episodes were defined as those with a Urinary Sensation Scale (USS) rating of 5 in the diary. USS: 5-item scale to measure urinary urgency; range: 1 (no feeling of urgency) to 5 (unable to hold; leak urine).~Mean number of UUI episodes per 24 hours was calculated as total number of micturitions with USS rating of 5 divided by total number of diary days collected at that visit. Change=mean at observation minus mean at baseline. Negative change, ie, decrease in number of UUI episodes relative to baseline=improvement." (NCT00806494)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 12

InterventionNumber of Episodes (Mean)
Week 4 (n=125)Week 12 (n=127)
Fesoterodine-1.19-1.64

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4 and 12

Urgency episodes were defined as those with a USS rating of >=3 in the diary. USS: 5-item scale to measure urinary urgency; range: 1 (no feeling of urgency) to 5 (unable to hold; leak urine). Mean number of urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated as total number of urgency episodes divided by total number of diary days collected at that visit. Change=mean at observation minus mean at baseline. Negative change, ie, decrease in number of urgency episodes relative to baseline=improvement. (NCT00806494)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 12

InterventionNumber of Episodes (Mean)
Week 4 (n=303)Week 12 (n=317)
Fesoterodine-3.94-5.10

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Severe Urgency Episodes (SUEs) Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4 and 12

SUEs were defined as those with a USS rating of >=4 in the diary. USS: 5-item scale to measure urinary urgency; range: 1 (no feeling of urgency) to 5 (unable to hold; leak urine). Mean number of SUEs per 24 hours was calculated as total number of SUEs divided by total number of diary days collected at that visit. Change=mean at observation minus mean at baseline. Negative change, ie, decrease in number of SUEs relative to baseline=improvement. (NCT00806494)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 12

InterventionNumber of Episodes (Mean)
Week 4 (n=268)Week 12 (n=278)
Fesoterodine-2.31-2.93

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reporting Satisfaction on the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ) at Week 12

TSQ: Independent component of the overactive bladder TSQ. Self- administered, 1-item measure of participant satisfaction for participants receiving treatment for OAB. The 5 categorical responses were grouped to 'Satisfied' (including 'very satisfied' and 'somewhat satisfied') and 'Dissatisfied' (including 'very dissatisfied','somewhat dissatisfied', and 'neither dissatisfied nor satisfied'). Percentage of participants reporting satisfaction included those with categorical responses of 'very satisfied' and 'somewhat satisfied'. (NCT00806494)
Timeframe: Week 12 (or Early Withdrawal)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Fesoterodine73.6

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in the Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Weeks 4 and 12

Percentage change from baseline in micturitions was calculated as change in mean number of micturitions per 24 hours at that visit divided by the baseline mean number of micturitions per 24 hours, multiplied by 100. (NCT00806494)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 12

InterventionPercentage Change (Mean)
Week 4 (n=305)Week 12 (n=317)
Fesoterodine-18.69-23.61

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) Score at Week 12

ICIQ-SF: self-administered questionnaire for assessment and quantification of incontinence and its impact on quality of life. ICIQ score=sum of the responses to 3 questions: How often do you leak urine? (range: 0=never to 5=all the time); How much urine do you usually leak? (range: 0=none to 6=a large amount); Overall, how much does leaking urine interfere with your everyday life? (range: 0=not at all to 10=a great deal). Score range=0 (low bother from urine leakage) to 21 (maximum bother). Negative change (decrease) from baseline in score value=reduced level of bother. (NCT00806494)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

InterventionScore on Scale (Mean)
Fesoterodine-5.13

[back to top]

Time to Gastric Emptying

Ascending colon emptying t½ was estimated by power exponential analysis of the proportionate emptying over time of counts from the colon. (NCT00832650)
Timeframe: Day 12: 2 hours, 4 hours

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Fesoterodine145.00
Placebo112.92
Solifenacin127.47

[back to top]

Proximal Colonic Emptying Time

Estimated by power exponential analysis of the proportionate emptying over time of counts from the colon. (NCT00832650)
Timeframe: Day 12 to 14

Interventionhours (Mean)
Fesoterodine21.06
Placebo14.79
Solifenacin19.23

[back to top]

Mean Score of Stool Consistency Per Day

Calculated by averaging the values of the stool form given at each visit to the toilet on each notional day. Mean of 3 days. Range of possible scores: 1 (hard lumps) to 7 (watery). (NCT00832650)
Timeframe: Day 11 to 13

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Fesoterodine3.66
Placebo3.29
Solifenacin3.02

[back to top]

Mean Proportion of Bowel Movements With Satisfaction Per Day

"The number of stools with satisfaction of Yes divided by the total number of stools passed on each notional day. Mean of 3 days." (NCT00832650)
Timeframe: Day 11 to 13

Interventionmean proportion (Mean)
Fesoterodine0.88
Placebo0.81
Solifenacin0.93

[back to top]

Mean Number of Stools Per Day

Number of stools passed on each notional day where each visit to the toilet counts as one stool (only) unless nothing is passed. Mean of 3 days. (NCT00832650)
Timeframe: Day 11 to 13

Interventionstools (Mean)
Fesoterodine0.93
Placebo1.06
Solifenacin1.11

[back to top]

Colonic Transit at 48 Hours

Colonic transit: Geometric centre at 48 hours (GC48) was estimated using geometric mean of counts in ascending (AC), transverse (TC), descending (DC) and rectosigmoid (RS) colon and stool (weighted by factors of 1 to 5 respectively). To calculate the geometric centre, the proportion of colonic counts in each colonic region was multiplied by its weighing factor: (% AC *1 + % TC *2 + % DC *3 + % RS *4 + % stool * 5 ) divided by 100. (NCT00832650)
Timeframe: Day 14 (Day 12 48 hours post-meal)

Interventioncounts (Mean)
Fesoterodine3.55
Placebo3.67
Solifenacin3.14

[back to top]

Colonic Transit at 24 Hours

Colonic transit: Geometric centre at 24 hours (GC24) was estimated using geometric mean of counts in ascending (AC), transverse (TC), descending (DC) and rectosigmoid (RS) colon and stool (weighted by factors of 1 to 5 respectively). To calculate the geometric centre, the proportion of colonic counts in each colonic region was multiplied by its weighing factor: (% AC *1 + % TC *2 + % DC *3 + % RS *4 + % stool * 5 ) divided by 100. (NCT00832650)
Timeframe: Day 13 (Day 12 24 hours post-meal)

Interventioncounts (Mean)
Fesoterodine1.98
Placebo2.51
Solifenacin1.91

[back to top]

Colonic Filling at 6 Hours

A surrogate marker of small bowel transit time. (NCT00832650)
Timeframe: Day 12

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
Fesoterodine7.84
Placebo69.58
Solifenacin24.06

[back to top]

Average Score of Ease of Passage During Defecation Per Day

Calculated by averaging the values given for the ease of passage at each visit to the toilet on each notional day. Mean of 3 days. Range of possible scores: 1 (Manual disimpaction) to 7 (Incontinent). (NCT00832650)
Timeframe: Day 11 to 13

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Fesoterodine3.90
Placebo3.97
Solifenacin3.83

[back to top]

Post-void Residual (PVR) Volume

Volume of urine remaining in the bladder immediately after urination. (NCT00857896)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8 post-dose

InterventionmL (Median)
Baseline (n=10)Week 4 (n=12)Week 8 (n=8)
Fesoterodine6.004.0025.00

[back to top]

Absorption Rate Constant (Ka)

(NCT00857896)
Timeframe: Day 28 and Day 56

Intervention1/hour (hr) (Mean)
Fesoterodine0.44

[back to top]

Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F)

Clearance of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. Clearance obtained after oral dose (apparent oral clearance) is influenced by the fraction of the dose absorbed. Clearance was estimated using non linear mixed effect modeling. Drug clearance is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the blood. (NCT00857896)
Timeframe: Day 28 and Day 56

InterventionL/hr (Mean)
Fesoterodine86.70

[back to top]

Apparent Volume of Distribution (VC/F)

The volume necessary to account for the total amount of drug in the body if it were present throughout the body at the same concentration found in the blood. Estimated using non linear mixed effect modeling. (NCT00857896)
Timeframe: Day 28 and Day 56

InterventionLiters (L) (Mean)
Fesoterodine1010.00

[back to top]

Change in Frequency of Urge Urinary Incontinence Episodes at Week 12.

(NCT00862745)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionepisodes (Mean)
Fesoterodine-2.5
Placebo-1.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Final Efficacy Assessment of Effective by Baseline and Treatment Characteristics

"Participants who were assessed as having improved from their baseline condition in the final efficacy assessment were considered as effective. Baseline and treatment characteristics included: geriatric status (<65 years or ≥65 years), age categories, gender, weight categories, height categories, allergic history, duration of disease, past overactive bladder (OAB) treatment history, medical history, kidney and liver disorders, concomitant medication, total administration period of Toviaz, completion status, daily dose of Toviaz, and long term administration of Toviaz (<274 days and ≥274 days) ." (NCT00879398)
Timeframe: At the end of study treatment

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
All ParticipantsGeriatric Status: <65 yearsGeriatric Status: ≥65 yearsAge Category: <50 yearsAge Category: 50 to 59 yearsAge Category: 60 to 69 yearsAge Category: 70 to 79 yearsAge Category: ≥80 yearsGender: MaleGender: FemaleWeight Category: <50 kgWeight Category: 50 to <60 kgWeight Category: 60 to <70 kgWeight Category: ≥70 kgHeight Category: <160 cmHeight Category: 160 to 170 cmHeight Category: ≥170 cmAllergic History: YesAllergic History: NoDuration of Disease: <1 weekDuration of Disease: 1 to <8 weeksDuration of Disease: 8 to <16 weeksDuration of Disease: ≥16 weeksPast OAB Treatment History: YesPast OAB Treatment History: NoExistence for Medical History of Past Disease: YesExistence for Medical History of Past Disease: NoMedical History of Present Disease: YesMedical History of Present Disease: NoKidney Disease: YesKidney Disease: NoLiver Disorder: YesLiver Disorder: NoAdministration Period of Toviaz: <2 monthsAdministration Period of Toviaz: 2 to <4 monthsAdministration Period Of Toviaz: ≥ 4 monthsDaily Dose of Toviaz: 3 mgDaily Dose of Toviaz: 4 mgDaily Dose of Toviaz: >4 to <8 mgDaily Dose of Toviaz: 8 mgCompletionDiscontinuationTotal Administration Period <274 daysTotal Administration Period ≥274 daysExistence for Concurrent Medication: YesExistence for Concurrent Medication: No
Toviaz90.1390.8689.2091.2791.0889.2989.4589.2788.9891.3689.7391.6490.3288.8289.9990.3290.3582.2290.2592.4089.4289.0584.3385.3091.7987.9690.4787.9692.4690.0090.1392.3190.1285.2292.4492.3366.6790.6585.2590.2592.2880.7290.1687.5088.4892.08

[back to top]

Participant Perception of Bladder Condition at the End of Study Treatment

Participant perception of bladder condition was recorded in the CRF by the investigator. Participants were asked at baseline (BL) and at the end of study treatment (EOT) if the extent to which their bladder condition caused them problems. The possible responses were: No Problem, Very Minor Problems, Minor Problems, Moderate Problems, Severe Problems, or Many Severe Problems. (NCT00879398)
Timeframe: Baseline and at the end of study treatment

InterventionParticipants (Number)
BL: No Problem/EOT: No problemBL: No Problem/EOT: Very Minor ProblemsBL: No Problem/EOT: Minor ProblemsBL: No Problem/EOT: Moderate ProblemsBL: No Problem/EOT: Severe ProblemsBL: No Problem/EOT: Many Severe ProblemsBL: Very Minor Problems/EOT:No ProblemBL:Very Minor Problems/EOT: Very Minor ProblemsBL: Very Minor Problems/EOT: Minor ProblemsBL: Very Minor Problems/EOT: Moderate ProblemsBL: Very Minor Problems/EOT: Severe ProblemsBL: Very Minor Problems/EOT: Many Severe ProblemsBL: Minor Problems/EOT: No ProblemBL: Minor Problems/EOT: Very Minor ProblemsBL: Minor Problems/EOT: Minor ProblemsBL: Minor Problems/EOT:Moderate ProblemsBL: Minor Problems/EOT: Severe ProblemsBL: Minor Problems/EOT: Many Severe ProblemsBL: Moderate Problems/EOT: No ProblemBL: Moderate Problems/EOT: Very Minor ProblemsBL: Moderate Problems/EOT: Minor ProblemsBL: Moderate Problems/EOT: Moderate ProblemsBL: Moderate Problems/EOT: Severe ProblemsBL: Moderate Problems/EOT: Many Severe ProblemsBL: Severe Problems/EOT: No ProblemBL: Severe Problems/EOT: Very Minor ProblemsBL: Severe Problems/EOT: Minor ProblemsBL: Severe Problems/EOT: Moderate ProblemsBL: Severe Problems/EOT: Severe ProblemsBL: Severe Problems/EOT: Many Severe ProblemsBL: Many Severe Problems/EOT: No ProblemBL: Many Severe Problems/EOT: Very Minor ProblemsBL: Many Severe Problems/EOT: Minor ProblemsBL: Many Severe Problems/EOT: Moderate ProblemsBL: Many Severe Problems/EOT: Severe ProblemsBL: Many Severe Problems/EOT: Many Severe Problems
Toviaz00010029330000105134421002244471711163118845622797490105195148975119

[back to top]

Investigator's Final Assessment of Effectiveness at the End of Study Treatment

The final efficacy assessment included improvement, no change, aggravation, and unevaluable evaluated by the investigator based on the subject's symptoms of frequent micturition, urgency, and urgency urinary incontinence (UUI). (NCT00879398)
Timeframe: At the end of study treatment

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
ImprovementNo ChangeAggravation
Toviaz90.139.500.37

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of UUI Episodes Per 24 Hours at the End of Study Treatment

The number of UUI episodes per 24 hours was recorded in the CRF by the investigator. Baseline was defined as data collected within 1 week prior to the first visit. (NCT00879398)
Timeframe: Baseline and at the end of study treatment

InterventionNumber of Episodes per 24 Hours (Mean)
Baseline (n=2800)End of study treatment (n=2800)Change from baseline (n=2800)
Toviaz1.070.27-0.80

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at the End of Study Treatment

The number of urgency episodes per 24 hours was recorded in the CRF by the investigator. Baseline was defined as data collected within 1 week prior to the first visit. (NCT00879398)
Timeframe: Baseline and at the end of study treatment

InterventionNumber of Episodes per 24 Hours (Mean)
Baseline (n=2724)End of Study Treatment (n=2724)Change from Baseline (n=2724)
Toviaz3.651.27-2.37

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at the End of Study Treatment

The number of micturitions per 24 hours was recorded in the case report form (CRF) by the investigator. Baseline was defined as data collected within 1 week prior to the first visit. (NCT00879398)
Timeframe: Baseline and at the end of study treatment

InterventionNumber of Episodes per 24 Hours (Mean)
Baseline (n=2718)End of Study Treatment (n=2718)Change from Baseline (n=2718)
Toviaz12.058.04-4.02

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject administered a product or medical device; the event was not necessarily had a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. All AEs reported after start of administration of Toviaz were considered as TEAEs. (NCT00879398)
Timeframe: From the time that the participant signed data privacy statement through and including 28 calendar days after the last administration of the study drug.

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Toviaz8.53

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12

Micturitions include episodes of voluntary micturition and episodes of UUI. UUI episodes were defined as those micturitions with USS rating of 5 in the diary in participants with UUI at baseline. USS rating 5: Unable to hold; leak urine. (NCT00911937)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and 12

,
Interventionmicturitions per 24 hours (Least Squares Mean)
Change at Week 4Change at Week 12
Fesoterodine-1.35-2.42
Placebo-0.90-1.86

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Frequency-urgency Sum Rating Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12

Frequency-urgency sum is total USS ratings recorded for all micturitions in 24-hour day. Number of USS ratings per 24 hours is sum of all USS ratings divided by the total diary days collected at that visit. USS scale: 1=No feeling of urgency to 5=Unable to hold: leak urine. Numerical decrease indicates improvement. (NCT00911937)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change at Week 4Change at Week 12
Fesoterodine-6.44-11.12
Placebo-4.88-8.69

[back to top]

Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score

OAB-q: a self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire that assesses how much the participant has been bothered by selected bladder symptoms. Each item rated by participant on Likert scale 1 (least symptom bother) to 6 (most symptom bother). Symptom bother score derived as sum of scores for questions 1-8; lowest possible raw score: 8; highest possible score: 48. Data analyzed based on transformation of the score to a 0 to 100 scale [(Actual total raw score - lowest possible value of raw score)/range]*100. Higher scores values indicative of greater symptom bother. (NCT00911937)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo50.46
Fesoterodine48.84

[back to top]

Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours

UUI episodes were defined as those with the USS rating of 5 in the diary. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. (NCT00911937)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionepisodes per 24 hours (Mean)
Placebo2.23
Fesoterodine2.20

[back to top]

Number of Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours

Nocturnal micturitions were defined as micturitions with USS rating 1-5 that occurred between the time the participant went to bed and the time he or she arose to start the next day. USS rating: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. The mean number of nocturnal micturitions per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of nocturnal micturitions divided by the total number of diary days collected at that visit. (NCT00911937)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionmicturitions per 24 hours (Mean)
Placebo3.19
Fesoterodine3.15

[back to top] [back to top]

Nocturnal Frequency-urgency Sum Rating Per 24 Hours

Frequency-urgency sum is total USS ratings recorded for all nocturnal micturitions in 24-hour day. Number of USS ratings per 24 hours is sum of all USS ratings divided by the total diary days collected at that visit. USS scale: 1=No feeling of urgency to 5=Unable to hold: leak urine. Numerical decrease indicates improvement. (NCT00911937)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo10.91
Fesoterodine10.60

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12

Nocturnal micturitions were defined as micturitions with USS rating 1-5 that occurred between the time the participant went to bed and the time he or she arose to start the next day. USS rating: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. The mean number of nocturnal micturitions per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of nocturnal micturitions divided by the total number of diary days collected at that visit. (NCT00911937)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and 12

,
Interventionmicturitions per 24 hours (Least Squares Mean)
Change at Week 4Change at Week 12
Fesoterodine-0.59-1.02
Placebo-0.48-0.84

[back to top]

Frequency-urgency Sum Rating Per 24 Hours

Frequency-urgency sum is total USS ratings recorded for all micturitions in 24-hour day. Number of USS ratings per 24 hours is sum of all USS ratings divided by the total diary days collected at that visit. USS scale: 1=No feeling of urgency to 5=Unable to hold: leak urine. (NCT00911937)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo39.54
Fesoterodine38.73

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Voided Volume Per Nocturnal Micturition at Week 12

Mean voided volume per nocturnal micturition was calculated as sum of voided volume during bedtime divided by the total number of bedtime micturition episodes with a recorded voided volume greater than 0 at that visit. (NCT00911937)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionmL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo15.49
Fesoterodine16.81

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Voided Volume Per Micturition at Week 12

Mean voided volume per micturition was calculated as sum of voided volume divided by the total number of total micturition episodes with a recorded voided volume greater than 0 at that visit. (NCT00911937)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionmL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo5.51
Fesoterodine4.65

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Frequency-urgency Sum Rating Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12

Frequency-urgency sum is total USS ratings recorded for all nocturnal micturitions in 24-hour day. Number of USS ratings per 24 hours is sum of all USS ratings divided by the total diary days collected at that visit. USS scale: 1=No feeling of urgency to 5=Unable to hold: leak urine. Numerical decrease indicates improvement. (NCT00911937)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change at Week 4Change at Week 12
Fesoterodine-2.46-4.08
Placebo-2.07-3.36

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12

Percent change of UUI episodes per 24 hours was calculated as change in 24-hour mean at that visit divided by the baseline 24-hour mean multiplied by 100 (100*(Week 4 or 12 - baseline)/baseline). (NCT00911937)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and 12

,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Change at Week 4Change at Week 12
Fesoterodine-34.8-59.2
Placebo-34.2-58.2

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12

Percent change of nocturnal micturitions per 24 hours was calculated as change in 24-hour mean at that visit divided by the baseline 24-hour mean multiplied by 100 (100*(Week 4 or 12 - baseline)/baseline). (NCT00911937)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and 12

,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Change at Week 4Change at Week 12
Fesoterodine-18.9-32.2
Placebo-15.1-26.2

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12

Percent change of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated as change in 24-hour mean at that visit divided by the baseline 24-hour mean multiplied by 100 (100*(Week 4 or 12 - baseline)/baseline). (NCT00911937)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and 12

,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Change at Week 4Change at Week 12
Fesoterodine-10.3-18.7
Placebo-6.7-14.2

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score at Week 4 and 12

OAB-q: a self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire that assesses how much the participant has been bothered by selected bladder symptoms. Each item rated by participant on Likert scale 1 (least symptom bother) to 6 (most symptom bother). Symptom bother score derived as sum of scores for questions 1-8; lowest possible raw score: 8; highest possible score: 48. Data analyzed based on transformation of the score to a 0 to 100 scale [(Actual total raw score - lowest possible value of raw score)/range]*100. Higher scores values indicative of greater symptom bother. (NCT00911937)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change at Week 4Change at Week 12
FesoterodineNA-20.28
PlaceboNA-15.91

[back to top]

Mean Voided Volume Per Nocturnal Micturition

Mean voided volume per nocturnal micturition was calculated as sum of voided volume during bedtime divided by the total number of bedtime micturition episodes with a recorded voided volume greater than 0 at that visit. (NCT00911937)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionmilliliter (mL) (Mean)
Placebo172.53
Fesoterodine173.14

[back to top]

Mean Voided Volume Per Micturition

Mean voided volume per micturition was calculated as sum of voided volume divided by the total number of total micturition episodes with a recorded voided volume greater than 0 at that visit. (NCT00911937)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionmL (Mean)
Placebo154.56
Fesoterodine158.38

[back to top]

Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours

Micturitions include episodes of voluntary micturition and episodes of Urgency Urinary Incontinence [UUI]. UUI episodes were defined as those micturitions with USS rating of 5 in the diary in participants with UUI at baseline. USS rating 5: Unable to hold; leak urine. (NCT00911937)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionmicturitions per 24 hours (Mean)
Placebo12.33
Fesoterodine12.30

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12

UUI episodes were defined as those with the USS rating of 5 in the diary. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. (NCT00911937)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and 12

,
Interventionepisodes per 24 hours (Least Squares Mean)
Change at Week 4Change at Week 12
Fesoterodine-0.90-1.26
Placebo-0.76-1.08

[back to top] [back to top]

Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours

Micturitions include episodes of voluntary micturition and episodes of UUI. UUI episodes were defined as those micturitions with USS rating of 5 in the diary in participants with UUI at baseline. USS rating 5: Unable to hold; leak urine. (NCT00928070)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionmicturitions per 24 hours (Mean)
Placebo12.22
Fesoterodine12.11

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours

UUI episodes were defined as those with the Urinary Sensation Scale (USS) rating of 5 in the diary. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. (NCT00928070)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionepisodes per 24 hours (Mean)
Placebo3.93
Fesoterodine4.07

[back to top]

Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)

MMSE measured general cognitive functioning: orientation, memory, attention, calculation, language, visuospatial functions. Total score derived from sub-scores; total ranges from 0 to 30, higher score indicates better cognitive state. (NCT00928070)
Timeframe: Screening

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo28.04
Fesoterodine28.16

[back to top]

Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score

OAB-q: a self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire that assesses how much the participant has been bothered by selected bladder symptoms. Each item rated by participant on Likert scale 1 (least symptom bother) to 6 (most symptom bother). Symptom bother score derived as sum of scores for questions 1-8; lowest possible raw score: 8; highest possible score: 48. Data analyzed based on transformation of the score to a 0 to 100 scale [(Actual total raw score - lowest possible value of raw score)/range]*100. Higher scores values indicative of greater symptom bother. (NCT00928070)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo67.67
Fesoterodine67.25

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12

Micturitions include episodes of voluntary micturition and episodes of UUI. UUI episodes were defined as those micturitions with USS rating of 5 in the diary in participants with UUI at baseline. USS rating 5: Unable to hold; leak urine. (NCT00928070)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 12

,
Interventionmicturitions per 24 hours (Least Squares Mean)
Change at Week 4Change at Week 12
Fesoterodine-1.64-2.34
Placebo-0.77-1.50

[back to top]

Frequency-Urgency Sum Rating Per 24 Hours

Frequency-urgency sum is total USS ratings recorded for all micturitions in 24-hour day. Number of USS ratings per 24 hours is sum of all USS ratings divided by the total diary days collected at that visit. USS scale: 1=No feeling of urgency to 5=Unable to hold: leak urine. (NCT00928070)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo45.33
Fesoterodine44.92

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overactive Bladder Satisfaction Questionnaire (OAB-S) Global Medication Satisfaction Question Response

"Participant's response to question, overall, how satisfied are you with your OAB medication? was obtained on a 5 point scale, 1- very satisfied, 2- somewhat satisfied, 3- neither dissatisfied nor satisfied, 4- somewhat dissatisfied and 5- very dissatisfied. Response values 1 and 2 were combined into satisfied, and 4 and 5 were combined into dissatisfied." (NCT00928070)
Timeframe: Week 12

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Not satisfiedNeither dissatisfied nor satisfiedSatisfied
Fesoterodine18.99.371.8
Placebo37.515.247.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Change From Screening in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and 12

PPBC: a self-administered, single-item, questionnaire that asks participants to describe their perception of their bladder-related problems. The PPBC assessment is rated on a 6-point scale: 1=no problems at all, 2=some very minor problems, 3=some minor problems, 4=moderate problems, 5=severe problems, 6=many severe problems. Deterioration=score difference is greater than 0; no change=score difference is 0; minor improvement=score difference is -1; major difference=score difference is less than or equal to -2. (NCT00928070)
Timeframe: Screening, Week 4, 12

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Baseline: No problems at allBaseline: Some very minor problemsBaseline: Some minor problemsBaseline: Moderate problemsBaseline: Severe problemsBaseline: Many severe problemsChange at Week 4: DeteriorationChange at Week 4: No changeChange at Week 4: Minor improvementChange at Week 4: Major improvementChange at Week 12: DeteriorationChange at Week 12: No changeChange at Week 12: Minor improvementChange at Week 12: Major improvement
Fesoterodine0.00.00.044.544.211.39.529.827.533.27.227.226.838.9
Placebo0.00.00.044.743.911.412.342.525.319.912.133.725.029.2

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12

Percent change of UUI episodes per 24 hours was calculated as change in 24-hour mean at that visit divided by the baseline 24-hour mean multiplied by 100 (i.e., 100*(Week 4 or 12 - baseline)/baseline). (NCT00928070)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 12

,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Change at Week 4Change at Week 12
Fesoterodine-57.2-71.2
Placebo-39.2-55.4

[back to top] [back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12

Percent change of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated as change in 24-hour mean at that visit divided by the baseline 24-hour mean multiplied by 100 (i.e., 100*(Week 4 or 12 - baseline)/baseline). (NCT00928070)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 12

,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Change at Week 4Change at Week 12
Fesoterodine-12.7-17.8
Placebo-5.1-10.4

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Post Void Residual (PVR) Volume at Week 4 and 12

PVR volume is defined as volume of urine remaining in the bladder immediately after urination. (NCT00928070)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 12

,
InterventionmL (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 4Change at Week 12
Fesoterodine25.6913.4313.58
Placebo26.511.83-2.98

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score at Week 4 and 12

OAB-q: a self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire that assesses how much the participant has been bothered by selected bladder symptoms. Each item rated by participant on Likert scale 1 (least symptom bother) to 6 (most symptom bother). Symptom bother score derived as sum of scores for questions 1-8; lowest possible raw score: 8; highest possible score: 48. Data analyzed based on transformation of the score to a 0 to 100 scale [(Actual total raw score - lowest possible value of raw score)/range]*100. Higher scores values indicative of greater symptom bother. (NCT00928070)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change at Week 4Change at Week 12
Fesoterodine-22.96-28.08
Placebo-13.81-20.48

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Protective Undergarments Changed Due to Urinary Leakage Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12

Protective Undergarments included pads, protective padding, protective underwear (pull up), and briefs (diaper). The mean number of undergarments changed per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of undergarments changed divided by the total number of diary days collected at that visit. Change from baseline values were reported at week 4 for subsets of population with baseline values less than or equal to (=<) 3.5 and more than (>) 3.5 undergarments/day and at Week 12 for subsets of population with baseline values =< 2.5 and > 2.5 undergarments/day. (NCT00928070)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 12

,
Interventionundergarments (Mean)
Baseline: =<3.5 undergarments (n=193,184)Baseline: >3.5 undergarments (n=12,19)Baseline: =<2.5 undergarments (n=172,169)Baseline: >2.5 undergarments (n=35,35)Change at Week 4: =<3.5 undergarments(n=193,184)Change at Week 4: >3.5 undergarments(n=12,19)Change at Week 12: =<2.5 undergarments(n=172,169)Change at Week 12: >2.5 undergarments(n=35,35)
Fesoterodine1.494.811.353.94-0.61-2.11-0.72-1.98
Placebo1.414.971.213.71-0.27-2.56-0.31-2.14

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Frequency-Urgency Sum Rating Per 24 Hours at Week 4 and 12

Frequency-urgency sum is total USS ratings recorded for all micturitions in 24-hour day. Number of USS ratings per 24 hours is sum of all USS ratings divided by the total diary days collected at that visit. USS scale: 1=No feeling of urgency to 5=Unable to hold: leak urine. Numerical decrease indicates improvement. (NCT00928070)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Change at Week 4Change at Week 12
Fesoterodine-11.62-16.50
Placebo-6.95-11.53

[back to top]

Overactive Bladder Satisfaction Questionnaire (OAB-S) Total Score on Satisfaction With OAB Control

OAB-S: a validated self-administered instrument that evaluates OAB medication expectations, daily life with AB, and satisfaction with OAB medication and includes 3 stand-alone items that assess overall expectation, satisfaction, and willingness to continue treatment. Satisfaction coded on scale of 1 to 5: (1=very satisfied to 5=very dissatisfied). Coding reversed algorithmically and results transformed: total score range 0 to100. Higher final response value associated with better satisfaction. (NCT00928070)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo52.98
Fesoterodine68.89

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12

UUI episodes were defined as those with the USS rating of 5 in the diary. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. (NCT00928070)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionepisodes per 24 hours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-2.20
Fesoterodine-2.84

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4

UUI episodes were defined as those with the USS rating of 5 in the diary. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. (NCT00928070)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4

Interventionepisodes per 24 hours (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.54
Fesoterodine-2.36

[back to top]

Change From Screening in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score at Week 12

MMSE measured general cognitive functioning: orientation, memory, attention, calculation, language, visuospatial functions. Total score derived from sub-scores; total ranges from 0 to 30, higher score indicates better cognitive state. Change: mean score at Week X minus mean score at baseline (NCT00928070)
Timeframe: Screening, Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.33
Fesoterodine0.15

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Agreed That They Increased Their Knowledge of Healthy Bladder Behaviors

The use of the YourWay plan was optional but was available to all participants and included healthy bladder behaviors such as setting and maintaining personal goals and choice of bladder-friendly food and drinks. (NCT00943735)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 90 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg85.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Agreed That They Had a Good Understanding About Their Condition and How to Treat it

(NCT00943735)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 90 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg89.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Agreed That They Found the YourWay Program Materials Easy to Understand

(NCT00943735)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 90 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg91.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Agreed That the YourWay Program Provided a Good Amount of Information

(NCT00943735)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 90 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg95.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Agreed That the YourWay Plan Provided a Strong Support System That Participants Could Count on for Information and Advice

YourWay participants received 6 telephone calls from an automated speech-recognition system over a period of approximately 11 weeks. The calls included reinforcement of treatment participation, treatment expectations, compliance, general health messages regarding OAB, review of training materials, optional weekly email communication, and a wrap-up call which included a summary of lessons learned from each of the Core 4 lessons calls and guidance to find additional information about medication and lifestyle tips to support management of OAB symptoms. (NCT00943735)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 90 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg81.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Agreed That the YourWay Plan Helped Them Play a More Active Role in Managing Their Condition

(NCT00943735)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 90 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg79.9

[back to top]

Among Participants Who Used the YourWay Website, the Percentage of Participants Who Agreed That the Website Was Useful

(NCT00943735)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 90 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg3.0

[back to top]

"Percentage of Participants Who Reported That They Trained Their Bladder to Wait"

"The use of the YourWay plan was optional but was available to all participants and included bladder training techniques such as to urinate each day when getting up and before going to bed, gradually increasing the amount of time between urinating, staying with timing goals whether there was a need to urinate or not, and bladder control tips (such as pelvic floor muscle squeeze, sit down and take 5 deep breaths, or stating I'm the boss - not my bladder)." (NCT00943735)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 90 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg86.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Reported Having Adopted Lifestyle Changes to Help Improve Their Overactive Bladder (OAB) Symptoms

The use of the YourWay plan was optional but was available to all participants and included guidance for food and drink choices, bladder training, treatment compliance, and use of a daily tracker. (NCT00943735)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 90 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg85.3

[back to top]

Comparison of Percentage of Participants Who Agreed That They Had a Good Understanding About Their Condition and How to Treat it, Between Enrollment Date and End of Study CATI Interview

(NCT00943735)
Timeframe: Enrollment (Day 0) up to 90 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Good understanding at enrollment (n=500)Good understanding at end of study (n=335)
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg78.489.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Visited the YourWay Website

YourWay plan was available and accessible to all participants prescribed fesoterodine, but was not defined as an explicit or required component. Plan included motivational support for taking fesoterodine and behavioral interventions shown in clinical studies to improve participants' Overactive Bladder (OAB) outcomes. Objectives included intervening quickly after treatment initiation, before participants had an opportunity to discontinue medication, reinforcing the treatable nature of OAB, and setting appropriate expectations for onset of action with therapy and degree of symptom improvement. (NCT00943735)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 90 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg28.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Reported They Were Satisfied With Their Physician

(NCT00943735)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 90 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg93.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Reported They Were Satisfied With the Treatment Goals and Bladder Symptoms Progress Trackers

"Treatment goals and bladder symptoms progress trackers were incorporated in the 12 Week Tracker which included a participant determined weekly goal, a reminder to fill the prescription (if appropriate interval), participant reported progress in response to this week I did well at, and a 7-day Daily Core 4 Tracker checklist (food and drink, teach your bladder, daily fesoterodine, and track your progress)." (NCT00943735)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 90 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg74.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Filled at Least Two Fesoterodine Prescriptions (First Refill) During the Study Period

The prototypical pattern was to fill 3 separate prescriptions, each for a 30-day supply, between the enrollment date and Day 90 of the study period; these prescription fills could happen as early as Day 0, 30, and 60 of the study period. At enrollment, the Investigator provided participants with a prescription for fesoterodine 4mg or 8mg to be filled at a pharmacy of their choice. The first refill indicated that 2 fesoterodine prescriptions had been filled. (NCT00943735)
Timeframe: Enrollment (Day 0) up to 90 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg13.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Filled at Least One Fesoterodine Prescription During the Study Period (Primary Adherence)

The prototypical pattern was to fill 3 separate prescriptions, each for a 30-day supply, between the enrollment date and Day 90 of the study period; these prescription fills could happen as early as Day 0, 30, and 60 of the study period. Primary adherence was met if the participant filled at least 1 fesoterodine prescription during the study period. (NCT00943735)
Timeframe: Enrollment (Day 0) up to 90 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg26.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Filled at Least 90 Days Supply of Fesoterodine (4mg QD or 8mg QD) Within 90 Days of Study Enrollment

Prototypical pattern for meeting primary endpoint was to fill 3 separate prescriptions (Rx), each for a 30-day supply between enrollment and Day 90. Rx fills could happen as early as Day 0, 30, and 60 of the study period. Participants could also have chosen to wait until their 14-day medication sample was exhausted before receiving their first fill. Investigators received no prescribing restrictions, but were advised not to write Rx for a 90-day supply of fesoterodine at enrollment visit. Participants whose first observed Rx was for a ≥90-day supply were non-evaluable for the primary endpoint. (NCT00943735)
Timeframe: Enrollment (Day 0) up to 90 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg10.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Agreed That They Were Able to Incorporate the YourWay Plan Into Their Lives

(NCT00943735)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 90 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg81.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Agreed That They Understood What to Expect From Their OAB Medication, Toviaz® (Fesoterodine)

Product indication and safety information was provided to all participants by the investigator and / or within the YourWay plan program information. (NCT00943735)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 90 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg88.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Agreed That They Understand OAB is a Chronic Condition That Can be Successfully Managed, But Generally Not Cured

(NCT00943735)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 90 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg93.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Agreed That They Learned Something About Their Condition

(NCT00943735)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 90 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg87.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Reported They Felt Confident That They Could Manage Their OAB as a Result of the YourWay Plan

(NCT00943735)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 90 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg72.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Reported They Were Satisfied With the Overall Content of the YourWay Plan

(NCT00943735)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 90 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg86.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Reported They Were Satisfied With the Participant Support Telephone Calls

YourWay participants received 6 telephone calls from an automated speech-recognition system over a period of approximately 11 weeks. The calls included reinforcement of treatment participation, treatment expectations, compliance, general health messages regarding OAB, review of training materials, optional weekly email communication, and a wrap-up call which included a summary of lessons learned from each of the Core 4 lessons calls and guidance to find additional information about medication and lifestyle tips to support management of OAB symptoms. (NCT00943735)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 90 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg78.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Reported That They Kept Track of Symptoms in the 12 Week Tracker Bladder Diary

"For each week, the 12 Week Tracker included a participant determined weekly goal, a reminder to fill the prescription (if appropriate interval), participant reported progress in response to this week I did well at, and a 7-day Daily Core 4 Tracker checklist (food and drink, teach your bladder, daily fesoterodine, and track your progress)." (NCT00943735)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 90 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg57.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Reported That They Took Toviaz® (Fesoterodine) as Directed

(NCT00943735)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 90 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg93.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Reported That They Recorded Their Treatment Goals in the Daily Core 4 Tracker

"YourWay Daily Core 4 Tracker to track daily progress in the 4 core areas of food and drink (make more informed choices), teach your bladder (train your bladder to wait), daily Toviaz® (always take as directed), and keep track (share with your doctor)." (NCT00943735)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 90 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg56.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Reported the YourWay Plan Encouraged Their Use of Toviaz® (Fesoterodine)

(NCT00943735)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 90 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg69.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Reported That They Made Bladder-friendly Food and Drink Choices

The use of the YourWay plan was optional but was available to all participants and included bladder-friendly food and drink choices and recipes as well as information for maintaining hydration and avoidance of potential bladder irritants (such as caffeine, citrus fruits and juices, artificial sweeteners, tomato-based foods, soda, alcohol, and spicy foods). (NCT00943735)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 90 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg82.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Reported That They Let Their Doctor Know How They Were Doing With the YourWay Plan

Participants were recruited for study participation when they presented with OAB symptoms during regularly-scheduled physician visits; screening and enrollment occurred during the same visit. Follow-up visits could be scheduled per standard clinical practice. (NCT00943735)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 90 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg56.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Reported Having Read the YourWay Plan Materials Received From Their Physician or From the Resource Kit

"YourWay plan included a starter pack with a 14-day supply of 4 mg or 8 mg fesoterodine; guidebook for YourWay plan components and lifestyle modification tips; plan progress tracker with additional lifestyle tips; plan enrollment form. About 1 week after plan enrollment, participants received a resource kit by mail which included: a cover letter; brochures for Core 4 elements (food and drink, teach your bladder, daily fesoterodine, and track your progress); bladder diary and track your progress brochure; and recipes using bladder-friendly foods." (NCT00943735)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 90 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine 4 mg or 8 mg97.3

[back to top]

Stress Incontinence Episode Frequency Per 24 Hours

Stress Incontinence Component of the daily IEF calculated as the average daily number of stress leakage episodes that occurred during the 3 days prior to randomization and the end of each treatment period. Day 7 mean for each treatment period was calculated as the mean daily episode frequency based on the diary completed in the final three days of each treatment period. (NCT01042236)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 7 of each period

,,
InterventionEpisodes per 24 hours. (Mean)
BaselineAbsolute value at Day 7Change at Day 7
Fesoterodine (4 mg)1.440.69-0.75
Fesoterodine (8 mg)1.440.98-0.46
Placebo1.440.82-0.62

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Closing Urethral Pressure at Day 7

Closing urethral pressure measured by urethral reflectometry calculated as the mean of each of the closing urethral pressure measurements obtained in triplicate at each time point for each participant. Day 7 mean for each treatment period was calculated as the mean of the three measurements taken post-dose on Day 7 of each treatment period separately. (NCT01042236)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 7 of each period

,,
InterventioncmH20 (Mean)
BaselineAbsolute value at Day 7Mean change at Day 7
Fesoterodine (4 mg)40.6237.84-2.78
Fesoterodine (8 mg)40.6238.75-1.88
Placebo40.6238.66-1.96

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Closing Urethral Elastance at Day 7

Closing urethral elastance measured by urethral reflectometry calculated as the mean of each of the closing urethral pressure measurements obtained in triplicate at each time point for each participant. Day 7 mean for each treatment period was calculated as the mean of the three measurements taken post-dose on Day 7 of each treatment period separately. (NCT01042236)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 7 of each period

,,
InterventioncmH2O/mm^2 (Mean)
BaselineAbsolue value at Day 7Mean change at Day 7
Fesoterodine (4 mg)1.851.56-0.28
Fesoterodine (8 mg)1.851.74-0.10
Placebo1.851.75-0.09

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Urgency Urinary Incontinence Episode Frequency Per 24 Hours

Urgency Urinary Incontinence Component of the daily IEF calculated as the average daily number of urgency leakage episodes that occurred during the 3 days prior to randomization and the end of each treatment period. Day 7 mean for each treatment period was calculated as the mean daily episode frequency based on the diary completed in the final three days of each treatment period. (NCT01042236)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 7 of each period

InterventionPercent (Median)
Fesoterodine (4 mg)-50.00
Fesoterodine (8 mg)-100.00
Placebo-100.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Opening Urethral Pressure (OUP) at Day 7

OUP measured by urethral reflectometry calculated as the mean of all of the OUP measurements obtained in triplicate at each time point for each participant. Day 7 mean for each treatment period was calculated as the mean of the three measurements taken post-dose on Day 7 of each treatment period separately. (NCT01042236)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 7 of each period

,,
Interventioncentimeter of water (cmH2O) (Mean)
BaselineAbsolute value at Day 7Mean change at Day 7
Fesoterodine (4 mg)49.8647.92-1.94
Fesoterodine (8 mg)49.8649.16-0.70
Placebo49.8648.53-1.34

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Stress Incontinence Episode Frequency Per 24 Hours

Stress Incontinence Component of the daily IEF calculated as the average daily number of stress leakage episodes that occurred during the 3 days prior to randomization and the end of each treatment period. Day 7 mean for each treatment period was calculated as the mean daily episode frequency based on the diary completed in the final three days of each treatment period. (NCT01042236)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 7 of each period

InterventionPercent (Median)
Fesoterodine (4 mg)-66.67
Fesoterodine (8 mg)-55.56
Placebo-60.00

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Incontinence Episode Frequency Per 24 Hours

Incontinence Episode Frequency (IEF) calculated as the average daily total incontinence episodes (stress or urgency) that occurred during the 3 days prior to randomization and the end of each treatment period. Day 7 mean for each treatment period was calculated as the mean daily episode frequency based on the diary completed in the final three days of each treatment period. (NCT01042236)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 7 of each period

InterventionPercent (Median)
Fesoterodine (4 mg)-66.67
Fesoterodine (8 mg)-55.56
Placebo-60.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Opening Urethral Elastance at Day 7

Opening urethral elastance measured by urethral reflectometry calculated as the mean of each of the opening urethral pressure measurements obtained in triplicate at each time point for each participant. Day 7 mean for each treatment period was calculated as the mean of the three measurements taken post-dose on Day 7 of each treatment period separately. (NCT01042236)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 7 of each period

,,
InterventioncmH2O/millimeter(mm)^2 (Mean)
BaselineAbsolue value at Day 7Mean Change at Day 7
Fesoterodine (4 mg)1.931.66-0.27
Fesoterodine (8 mg)1.931.85-0.08
Placebo1.931.83-0.10

[back to top]

Incontinence Episode Frequency Per 24 Hours

Incontinence Episode Frequency (IEF) calculated as the average daily total incontinence episodes (stress or urgency) that occurred during the 3 days prior to randomization and the end of each treatment period. Day 7 mean for each treatment period was calculated as the mean daily episode frequency based on the diary completed in the final three days of each treatment period. (NCT01042236)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 7 of each period

,,
InterventionEpisodes per 24 hours. (Mean)
BaselineAbsolute value at Day 7Change at Day 7
Fesoterodine (4 mg)1.520.71-0.81
Fesoterodine (8 mg)1.520.98-0.54
Placebo1.520.82-0.70

[back to top]

Plasma 5-hydroxymethyl Tolterodine (5- HMT) Concentration

Plasma 5-HMT concentration data pre and post reflectometry following multiple doses of fesoterodine 4 mg OD and fesoterodine 8 mg OD. Day 7 mean for each treatment period was calculated as the mean of the three measurements taken post-dose on Day 7 of each treatment period separately. Summary statistics were to be calculated by setting concentration values below the lower limit of quantification (LLQ = 0.02 ng/mL) to zero. Summary statistics were not to be presented if number of observations above lower limit of quantification (NALQ) = 0. (NCT01042236)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 7 of each period

,
Interventionnanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean)
Pre-Reflectometry (n=18, 18)Post-Reflectometry (n=18, 17)
Fesoterodine (4 mg)2.3032.185
Fesoterodine (8 mg)4.9024.971

[back to top]

Urgency Urinary Incontinence Episode Frequency Per 24 Hours

Urgency Urinary Incontinence Component of the daily IEF calculated as the average daily number of urgency leakage episodes that occurred during the 3 days prior to randomization and the end of each treatment period. Day 7 mean for each treatment period was calculated as the mean daily episode frequency based on the diary completed in the final three days of each treatment period. (NCT01042236)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 7 of each period

,,
InterventionEpisodes per 24 hours. (Mean)
BaselineAbsolute value at Day 7Change at Day 7
Fesoterodine (4 mg)0.080.02-0.06
Fesoterodine (8 mg)0.080.00-0.08
Placebo0.080.00-0.08

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Incontinent Participants at Baseline

UUI episodes were defined as those with the urinary sensation scale (USS) rating of 5 in the diary. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. (NCT01054222)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Fesoterodine58.1

[back to top] [back to top]

King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) Domain Scores

KHQ: self-administered questionnaire contained 21 questions scored in 9 domains (general health perception, incontinence impact, role limitations, physical limitations, social limitations, personal relationships, emotions, sleep/energy, and severity of urinary symptoms). Each domain score ranged: 0-100, where 0=best outcome/response and 100=worst outcome/response. (NCT01054222)
Timeframe: Baseline, End of Treatment (EOT) (Week 82)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
General Health Perception: Baseline (n=28)General Health Perception: EOT (n=20)Incontinence Impact: Baseline (n=27)Incontinence Impact: EOT (n=20)Role Limitations: Baseline (n=27)Role Limitations: EOT (n=20)Physical Limitations: Baseline (n=27)Physical Limitations: EOT (n=20)Social Limitations: Baseline (n=27)Social Limitations: EOT (n=20)Personal Relationships: Baseline (n=11)Personal Relationships: EOT (n=10)Emotions: Baseline (n=27)Emotions: EOT (n=20)Sleep/Energy: Baseline (n=27)Sleep/Energy: EOT (n=20)Severity of Urinary Symptoms: Baseline (n=27)Severity of Urinary Symptoms: EOT (n=20)
Fesoterodine43.7538.7550.6241.6731.4835.0037.0434.1713.9920.561.5211.6735.8032.7834.5735.0044.6942.33

[back to top]

Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours

Micturitions include episodes of voluntary micturition and episodes of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI). UUI episodes were defined as those micturitions with USS rating of 5 in the diary in participants with UUI at baseline. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. (NCT01054222)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (Week 82)

Interventionmicturitions per 24 hours (Mean)
Baseline (n= 28)Month 3 (n= 25)Month 6 (n= 28)Month 9 (n= 28)Month 12 (n= 28)Month 15 (n= 27)Month 18 (n= 24)End of Treatment (n= 28)
Fesoterodine13.4410.9710.9810.4410.5110.6710.6010.38

[back to top]

Mean Number of Nocturnal Micturitions Per 24 Hours

Nocturnal micturitions were defined as micturitions with USS rating 1-5 that occurred between the time the participant went to bed and the time he or she arose to start the next day. USS rating: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. The mean number of nocturnal micturitions per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of nocturnal micturitions divided by the total number of diary days collected at that visit. (NCT01054222)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (Week 82)

Interventionmicturitions per 24 hours (Mean)
Baseline (n= 28)Month 3 (n= 25)Month 6 (n= 28)Month 9 (n= 28)Month 12 (n= 28)Month 15 (n= 27)Month 18 (n= 24)End of Treatment (n= 28)
Fesoterodine3.453.083.253.072.883.002.952.95

[back to top] [back to top]

Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours

UUI episodes were defined as those with the USS rating of 5 in the diary. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. (NCT01054222)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (Week 82)

Interventionepisodes per 24 hours (Mean)
Baseline (n= 28)Month 3 (n= 25)Month 6 (n= 28)Month 9 (n= 28)Month 12 (n= 28)Month 15 (n= 27)Month 18 (n= 24)End of Treatment (n= 28)
Fesoterodine2.642.271.541.361.291.831.651.49

[back to top]

Mean Number of Urinary Incontinence Pads, Barrier Creams and Powder Used Per 24 Hours

The mean number of urinary incontinence pads (IP), barrier creams (BC) and powder used per 24 hours is calculated as the total number of IP, BC and powder used divided by the total number of diary days collected at that visit. (NCT01054222)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (Week 82)

InterventionUnits per 24 hours (Mean)
Baseline: IP (n= 18)Baseline: BC (n= 18)Baseline: Powder (n= 18)Month 3: IP (n= 16)Month 3: BC (n= 16)Month 3: Powder (n= 16)Month 6: IP (n= 18)Month 6: BC (n= 18)Month 6: Powder (n= 18)Month 9: IP (n= 18)Month 9: BC (n= 18)Month 9: Powder (n= 18)Month 12: IP (n= 18)Month 12: BC (n= 18)Month 12: Powder (n= 18)Month 15: IP (n= 17)Month 15: BC (n= 17)Month 15: Powder (n= 17)Month 18: IP (n= 15)Month 18: BC (n= 15)Month 18: Powder (n= 15)End of Treatment: IP (n= 18)End of Treatment: BC (n= 18)End of Treatment: Powder (n= 18)
Fesoterodine3.690.480.243.150.790.193.020.430.202.560.330.172.520.130.312.450.180.002.490.180.002.310.150.00

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Month 3,6,9,12,15,18, and End of Treatment

PPBC: self-administered, single-item, questionnaire that asked participants to describe their perception of their bladder-related problems. PPBC assessment rated on a 6-point scale: 1=no problems at all, 2=some very minor problems, 3=some minor problems, 4=moderate problems, 5=severe problems, 6=many severe problems. Change = observation minus baseline. Results categorized as Deterioration (score difference ≥1), No Change (score difference=0), Improvement (score difference less than [<]0). (NCT01054222)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (Week 82)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Baseline: No Problems at all (n= 28)Baseline: Some Very Minor Problems (n= 28)Baseline: Some Minor Problems (n= 28)Baseline: Some Moderate Problems (n= 28)Baseline: Severe Problems (n= 28)Baseline: Many Severe Problems (n= 28)Change at Month 3: Deterioration (n= 27)Change at Month 3: No Change (n= 27)Change at Month 3: Improvement (n= 27)Change at Month 6: Deterioration (n= 28)Change at Month 6: No Change (n= 28)Change at Month 6: Improvement (n= 28)Change at Month 9: Deterioration (n= 28)Change at Month 9: No Change (n= 28)Change at Month 9: Improvement (n= 28)Change at Month 12: Deterioration (n= 28)Change at Month 12: No Change (n= 28)Change at Month 12: Improvement (n= 28)Change at Month 15: Deterioration (n= 27)Change at Month 15: No Change (n= 27)Change at Month 15: Improvement (n= 27)Change at Month 18: Deterioration (n= 24)Change at Month 18: No Change (n= 24)Change at Month 18: Improvement (n= 24)Change at EOT: Deterioration (n= 28)Change at EOT: No Change (n= 28)Change at EOT: Improvement (n= 28)
Fesoterodine0211114069126121061210512116101166126913

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Urgency Scale (PPUS) at Months 3,6,9,12,15,18, and End of Treatment

PPUS: self-administered, single-item, questionnaire that measured the participant's perception of urinary urgency. It was sensitive to changes in perceptions of urinary urgency over time. Score of 0 (usually not able to hold urine), 1 (usually able to hold urine [without leaking] until reaching toilet if go to toilet immediately), or 2 (usually able to finish what he/she was doing before going to toilet [without leaking]). Change = observation minus baseline. Deterioration: negative difference of scores; improvement: increase of 1 or more points in difference of scores, relative to baseline. (NCT01054222)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (Week 82)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Baseline: Score 0, Unable to hold urine (n= 28)Baseline: Score 1, Able to hold urine (n= 28)Baseline:Score 2,Able to finish ongoing task(n=28)Change at Month 3: Deterioration (n= 27)Change at Month 3: No Change (n= 27)Change at Month 3: Improvement (n= 27)Change at Month 6: Deterioration (n= 28)Change at Month 6: No Change (n= 28)Change at Month 6: Improvement (n= 28)Change at Month 9: Deterioration (n= 28)Change at Month 9: No Change (n= 28)Change at Month 9: Improvement (n= 28)Change at Month 12: Deterioration (n= 28)Change at Month 12: No Change (n= 28)Change at Month 12: Improvement (n= 28)Change at Month 15: Deterioration (n= 27)Change at Month 15: No Change (n= 27)Change at Month 15: Improvement (n= 27)Change at Month 18: Deterioration (n= 24)Change at Month 18: No Change (n= 24)Change at Month 18: Improvement (n= 24)Change at EOT: Deterioration (n= 28)Change at EOT: No Change (n= 28)Change at EOT: Improvement (n= 28)
Fesoterodine312135175913671927174519361266166

[back to top]

Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score

OAB-q: a self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire that assesses how much the participant has been bothered by selected bladder symptoms. Each item rated by participant on Likert scale 1 (least symptom bother) to 6 (most symptom bother). Symptom bother score derived as sum of scores for questions 1-8; lowest possible raw score: 8; highest possible score: 48. Data analyzed based on transformation of the score to a 0 to 100 scale [(Actual total raw score - lowest possible value of raw score)/range]*100. Higher scores values indicative of greater symptom bother. (NCT01054222)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (Week 82)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n= 28)Month 3 (n= 27)Month 6 (n= 28)Month 9 (n= 28)Month 12 (n= 28)Month 15 (n= 27)Month 18 (n= 24)End of Treatment (n= 28)
Fesoterodine35.5433.2932.9533.9329.5531.3031.4632.59

[back to top]

Daily Sum Rating on the Urinary Sensation Scale (USS)

The daily sum rating was calculated as the mean rating score on the USS multiplied by the mean number of micturitions per 24 hours at that visit. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. Numerical decrease indicates improvement. (NCT01054222)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (Week 82)

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Baseline (n= 28)Month 3 (n= 25)Month 6 (n= 28)Month 9 (n= 28)Month 12 (n= 28)Month 15 (n= 27)Month 18 (n= 24)End of Treatment (n= 28)
Fesoterodine45.6331.6031.3928.2927.6328.6729.0128.60

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With No Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episode

UUI episodes were defined as those with the urinary sensation scale (USS) rating of 5 in the diary. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. (NCT01054222)
Timeframe: Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (Week 82)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Month 3 (n= 16)Month 6 (n= 18)Month 9 (n= 18)Month 12 (n= 18)Month 15 (n= 17)Month 18 (n= 15)End of Treatment (n= 18)
Fesoterodine81.377.877.877.864.766.766.7

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Response to Overactive Bladder Satisfaction Questionnaire (OAB-s) (Questions 5, 9, 10a-10d, and 11a-11b)

"OAB-s assessed OAB medication expectations, daily life with OAB, and satisfaction with OAB medication. Question (Q) 5 evaluates OAB medication expectations (exceeds/meets or does not meet expectation). Q9 to 11 assessed satisfaction with OAB medication's ability to allow reaching bathroom without urine loss (Q9), decrease: sudden urgencies to urinate (Q10a), urine loss due to urgency (Q10b), waking up at night to urinate (Q10c) and urination during day (Q10d), and improve control of urine loss (Q11a) and need to urinate (Q11b). Q9 to 11 were answered as 'very satisfied', 'somewhat satisfied', 'neither dissatisfied nor satisfied', 'somewhat dissatisfied', and 'very dissatisfied'. The results for Q9 to 11 are reported as satisfied (participants who answered 'very satisfied' or 'somewhat satisfied' for all 7 questions) or not satisfied (participants who answered 'neither dissatisfied nor satisfied' or 'somewhat dissatisfied' or 'very dissatisfied' for all 7 questions)." (NCT01054222)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, End of Treatment (EOT) (Week 82)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline, Q5: Exceeding/meeting expectations(n=26)Baseline, Q5: Does not meet expectations (n= 26)Month 3, Q5: Exceeding/meeting expectations(n=27)Month 3, Q5: Does not meet expectations (n= 27)Month 6, Q5: Exceeding/meeting expectations(n=28)Month 6, Q5: Does not meet expectations (n= 28)Month 9, Q5: Exceeding/meeting expectations(n=28)Month 9, Q5: Does not meet expectations (n= 28)Month 12, Q5: Exceeding/meeting expectations(n=28)Month 12, Q5: Does not meet expectations (n= 28)Month 15, Q5: Exceeding/meeting expectations(n=27)Month 15, Q5: Does not meet expectations (n= 27)Month 18, Q5: Exceeding/meeting expectations(n=24)Month 18, Q5: Does not meet expectations (n= 24)EOT, Q5: Exceeding/meeting expectations(n=28)EOT, Q5: Does not meet expectations (n= 28)Baseline; Q9, 10a-10d, 11a-11b: Satisfied (n=27)Baseline; Q9,10a-10d,11a-11b: Not Satisfied (n=27)Month 3; Q9, 10a-10d, 11a-11b: Satisfied (n=26)Month 3; Q9,10a-10d,11a-11b: Not Satisfied (n=26)Month 6; Q9, 10a-10d, 11a-11b: Satisfied (n=27)Month 6; Q9,10a-10d,11a-11b: Not Satisfied (n=27)Month 9; Q9, 10a-10d, 11a-11b: Satisfied (n=27)Month 9; Q9,10a-10d,11a-11b: Not Satisfied (n=27)Month 12; Q9, 10a-10d, 11a-11b: Satisfied (n=27)Month 12; Q9,10a-10d,11a-11b: Not Satisfied (n=27)Month 15; Q9, 10a-10d, 11a-11b: Satisfied (n=26)Month 15; Q9,10a-10d,11a-11b: Not Satisfied (n=26)Month 18; Q9, 10a-10d, 11a-11b: Satisfied (n=24)Month 18; Q9,10a-10d,11a-11b: Not Satisfied (n=24)EOT; Q9, 10a-10d, 11a-11b: Satisfied (n=27)EOT; Q9,10a-10d,11a-11b: Not Satisfied (n=27)
Fesoterodine224225253253244234195235198179151216111611179168189

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 4 and Month 4

"PPBC: single-item, self-administered validated questionnaire. Rated on a 6-point scale: participant was asked: Which of the following statements describes your bladder condition best at the moment? 1=no problems at all; 2=some very minor problems; 3=some minor problems; 4=some moderate problems; 5=severe problems; 6=many severe problems. Change from baseline results categorized as deterioration (Positive change from baseline); no Change (scores change=0); minor Improvement (negative score change in magnitude of 1); major improvement (negative score change in magnitude of >=2)." (NCT01091519)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Month 4

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline: No problem at all (n=266, 368)Baseline: Some very minor problems (n=266, 368)Baseline: Some minor problems (n=266, 368)Baseline: Some moderate problems (n=266, 368)Baseline: Severe problems (n=266, 368)Baseline: Many severe problems (n=266, 368)Change at Week 4: Deterioration (n=266, 368)Change at Week 4: No change (n=266, 368)Change at Week 4: Minor improvement (n=266, 368)Change at Week 4: Major improvement (n=266, 368)Change at Month 4: Deterioration (n=252, 330)Change at Month 4: No change (n=252, 330)Change at Month 4: Minor improvement (n=252, 330)Change at Month 4: Major improvement (n=252, 330)
Fesoterodine With Educational Materials1215751452812579010773249164
Fesoterodine Without Educational Materials031612217948149310715444382201

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Satisfied With Treatment at Month 4

"Participant's response to treatment was based on treatment satisfaction questionnaires (TSQ). Participants answered: overall, how satisfied are you with your OAB medication? and were asked to rate this question on 5 point scale as 1=very satisfied, 2=somewhat satisfied, 3= neither dissatisfied nor satisfied, 4=somewhat dissatisfied and 5=very dissatisfied. Five categorical responses were grouped to satisfied (including very satisfied and somewhat satisfied) and dissatisfied (including very dissatisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, and neither dissatisfied nor satisfied)." (NCT01091519)
Timeframe: Month 4

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine With Educational Materials79.6
Fesoterodine Without Educational Materials76.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction Question (TSQ) at Week 4 and Month 4

"Participant's response to the treatment was based on treatment satisfaction questionnaires (TSQ). TSQ was rated on a 5-point scale, participant was asked: overall how satisfied are you with your over active bladder (OAB) medication? 1=very satisfied, 2=somewhat satisfied, 3=neither dissatisfied nor satisfied, 4=somewhat dissatisfied, 5=very dissatisfied. Change from baseline results categorized as deterioration (Positive change from baseline);no change (scores change=0);minor improvement (negative score change in magnitude of 1);major improvement (negative score change in magnitude of >=2)." (NCT01091519)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Month 4

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline: Very Satisfied (n=144, 203)Baseline: Somewhat Satisfied (n=144, 203)Baseline:Neither Dissatisfied/Satisfied(n=144,203)Baseline: Somewhat Dissatisfied (n=144, 203)Baseline: Very Dissatisfied (n=144, 203)Change at Week 4: Deterioration (n=144, 203)Change at Week 4: No Change (n=144, 203)Change at Week 4: Minor Improvement (n=144, 203)Change at Week 4: Major Improvement (n=144, 203)Change at Month 4: Deterioration (n=143, 179)Change at Month 4: No Change (n=143, 179)Change at Month 4: Minor Improvement (n=143, 179)Change at Month 4: Major Improvement (n=143, 179)
Fesoterodine With Educational Materials22047601564542512335157
Fesoterodine Without Educational Materials4295495211656567510384883

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Urgency Scale (PPUS) at Week 4 and Month 4

"PPUS: single-item, self-administered validated questionnaire. Rated on a 3-point scale: participant was asked: Which of the following would typically describe your experience when you have a desire to urinate? 1=usually not able to hold urine; 2=usually able to hold urine (without leaking) until I reach a toilet if I go to the toilet immediately; 3= usually able to finish what I am doing before going to the toilet (without leaking). Change from baseline results categorized as deterioration (Negative change); no change (Score change=0); improvement (Positive change)." (NCT01091519)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Month 4

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline: Usually not able hold urine (n=252, 351)Baseline: Usually able to hold urine (n=252, 351)Baseline: Usually able to finish (n=252, 351)Change at Week 4: Deterioration (n=252, 351)Change at Week 4: No Change (n=252, 351)Change at Week 4: Improvement (n=252, 351)Change at Month 4: Deterioration (n=238, 311)Change at Month 4: No Change (n=238, 311)Change at Month 4: Improvement (n=238, 311)
Fesoterodine With Educational Materials7515720191301032985124
Fesoterodine Without Educational Materials116186492817414932109170

[back to top]

CogState Groton Maze Learning Task (GMLT)

GMLT: a cognitive test which assessed executive function. Participant was shown a 10 x 10 grid of tiles on a computer touch screen. A 28-step pathway was hidden among 100 possible locations. The participant was instructed to move 1 step from the start location and then continue 1 tile at a time, toward the end to find the pathway. The outcome measure was total number of errors made in attempting to learn the same hidden pathway on 5 consecutive trials at a single session. Lower scores meant a better performance. (NCT01161472)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionErrors (Mean)
Fesoterodine 4 mg53.72
Fesoterodine 8 mg58.39
Aplrazolam 1 mg56.83
Placebo52.28

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in CogState Groton Maze Learning Task on Day 6

GMLT: a cognitive test which assessed executive function. Participant was shown a 10 x 10 grid of tiles on a computer touch screen. A 28-step pathway was hidden among 100 possible locations. The participant was instructed to move 1 step from the start location and then continue 1 tile at a time, toward the end to find the pathway. The outcome measure was total number of errors made in attempting to learn the same hidden pathway on 5 consecutive trials at a single session. Lower scores meant a better performance. (NCT01161472)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 6

InterventionErrors (Least Squares Mean)
Fesoterodine 4 mg-4.1399
Fesoterodine 8 mg-5.7717
Aplrazolam 1 mg24.7115
Placebo-4.1467

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in CogState One Card Learning on Day 6

One card learning: a cognitive test which assessed visual learning. Participants were to remember which cards were previously shown in a task. The outcome measure was accuracy of performance; arcsine transformation of the square root (sqrt) of the proportion of correct responses. Higher scores meant a better performance. (NCT01161472)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 6

InterventionArcsine [(sqrt) proportion correct] (Least Squares Mean)
Fesoterodine 4 mg-0.0094
Fesoterodine 8 mg0.0151
Aplrazolam 1 mg-0.0880
Placebo-0.0058

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in CogState CPAL on Day 6

CPAL: a cognitive test which assessed visual episodic learning. Participant was to learn and remember picture locations on the screen and was to tap the target on the central location to begin. As each picture was revealed, the participant was to remember where the picture was located and tap that location. The outcome measure was the number of errors made in correctly placing each of the 4 patterns in their location 4 times. Lower scores meant a better performance. (NCT01161472)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 6

InterventionErrors (Least Squares Mean)
Fesoterodine 4 mg6.7933
Fesoterodine 8 mg-16.7905
Aplrazolam 1 mg58.2002
Placebo3.1304

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Computer Based Objective Cognition Testing (CogState) Detection Speed on Day 6

Detection speed: a cognitive test which assessed psychomotor function. A playing card was presented face up in the center of the screen. As soon as this happened, the participant was to press the 'Yes' key. The outcome measure was speed of performance; mean of the log10 transformed reaction time for correct responses [measured in log10 milliseconds (MS)]. Lower scores meant a better performance. (NCT01161472)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 6

InterventionLog10 MS (Least Squares Mean)
Fesoterodine 4 mg-0.0201
Fesoterodine 8 mg-0.0119
Aplrazolam 1 mg0.0684
Placebo0.0084

[back to top]

CogState Continuous Paired Associate Learning (CPAL)

CPAL: a cognitive test which assessed visual episodic learning. Participant was to learn and remember picture locations on the screen and was to tap the target on the central location to begin. As each picture was revealed, the participant was to remember where the picture was located and tap that location. The outcome measure was the number of errors made in correctly placing each of the 4 patterns in their location 4 times. Lower scores meant a better performance. (NCT01161472)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionErrors (Mean)
Fesoterodine 4 mg96.33
Fesoterodine 8 mg99.83
Aplrazolam 1 mg89.50
Placebo107.44

[back to top]

CogState Identification Speed

Identification speed: a cognitive test which assessed visual attention. A playing card was presented face up in the center of the screen. As soon as this happened, the participant had to decide whether the card was red or not. The outcome measure was speed of performance; mean of the log10 transformed reaction time for correct responses (measured in log10 MS). Lower scores meant a better performance. (NCT01161472)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionLog10 MS (Mean)
Fesoterodine 4 mg2.7540
Fesoterodine 8 mg2.7672
Aplrazolam 1 mg2.7577
Placebo2.7457

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in CogState Identification Speed on Day 6

Identification speed: a cognitive test which assessed visual attention. A playing card was presented face up in the center of the screen. As soon as this happened, the participant had to decide whether the card was red or not. The outcome measure was speed of performance; mean of the log10 transformed reaction time for correct responses (measured in log10 MS). Lower scores meant a better performance. (NCT01161472)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 6

InterventionLog10 MS (Least Squares Mean)
Fesoterodine 4 mg0.0105
Fesoterodine 8 mg0.0057
Aplrazolam 1 mg0.0817
Placebo0.0142

[back to top]

Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)

RAVLT evaluates a wide diversity of functions: short-term auditory-verbal memory, rate of learning, learning strategies, retroactive, and proactive interference, presence of confabulation of confusion in memory processes, retention of information, and differences between learning and retrieval. Assessment of RAVLT is between 10 to 15 minutes; Performance variable: the sum of the number of words recalled successfully on the delayed recall trial. Higher score meant a better performance. (NCT01161472)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionWords Recalled (Mean)
Fesoterodine 4 mg6.50
Fesoterodine 8 mg6.67
Aplrazolam 1 mg7.22
Placebo6.33

[back to top]

Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) on Day 6

RAVLT evaluates a wide diversity of functions: short-term auditory-verbal memory, rate of learning, learning strategies, retroactive, and proactive interference, presence of confabulation of confusion in memory processes, retention of information, and differences between learning and retrieval. Assessment of RAVLT is between 10 to 15 minutes; Performance variable: the sum of the number of words recalled successfully on the delayed recall trial. Higher score meant a better performance. (NCT01161472)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 6

InterventionWords Recalled (Least Squares Mean)
Fesoterodine 4 mg0.1565
Fesoterodine 8 mg-0.1780
Aplrazolam 1 mg-3.9222
Placebo-0.1119

[back to top]

Computer Based Objective Cognition Testing (CogState) Detection Speed

Detection speed: a cognitive test which assessed psychomotor function. A playing card was presented face up in the center of the screen. As soon as this happened, the participant was to press the 'Yes' key. The outcome measure was speed of performance; mean of the log10 transformed reaction time for correct responses [measured in log10 milliseconds (MS)]. Lower scores meant a better performance. (NCT01161472)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionLog10 MS (Mean)
Fesoterodine 4 mg2.6333
Fesoterodine 8 mg2.5971
Aplrazolam 1 mg2.6103
Placebo2.5842

[back to top]

CogState One Card Learning

One card learning: a cognitive test which assessed visual learning. Participants were to remember which cards were previously shown in a task. The outcome measure was accuracy of performance; arcsine transformation of the square root (sqrt) of the proportion of correct responses. Higher scores meant a better performance. (NCT01161472)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionArcsine [(sqrt) proportion correct] (Mean)
Fesoterodine 4 mg0.9585
Fesoterodine 8 mg0.9421
Aplrazolam 1 mg0.9531
Placebo0.9302

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Seriousness, Severity and Relationship to Treatment

Counts of participants who had treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), defined as newly occurring or worsening after first dose. Relatedness to fesoterodine fumarate (Toviaz) was assessed by the investigator. Participants with multiple occurrences of an AE within a category were counted once within the category. Seriousness of an AE was assessed under the criteria of serious adverse event (SAE). AE was assessed according to severity; mild (not causing any significant problem, dose adjustment not required), moderate (caused problem that does not interfere significantly with usual activities or the clinical status, dose adjustment needed due to AE) and severe (caused problem that interferes significantly with usual activities or the clinical status, study drug stopped due to AE). (NCT01260311)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 28 days after last dose

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants with AEs, all-causalityParticipants with AEs, treatment-relatedParticipants with serious AEs, all-causalityParticipants with serious AEs, treatment-relatedParticipants with severe AEs, all-causalityParticipants with severe AEs, treatment-related
Fesoterodine Fumarate21190022

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Fesoterodine Metabolite (5-HMT)

(NCT01286454)
Timeframe: 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 24, 30, 36 and 48 hrs post dose

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Fesoterodine 4 mg IR-BIC Fasted5.830
Fesoterodine 4 mg 10% ER-BIC Fasted3.030
Fesoterodine 4 mg 15% ER-BIC Fasted1.092
Fesoterodine 4 mg 20% ER-BIC Fasted0.323
Fesoterodine 4 mg ER Tablet Fasted2.247
Fesoterodine 4 mg 10% ER-BIC Fed5.183

[back to top]

Plasma Decay Half Life (t1/2) for Fesoterodine Metabolite (5-HMT)

Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half. (NCT01286454)
Timeframe: 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 24, 30, 36 and 48 hrs post dose

Interventionhr (Mean)
Fesoterodine 4 mg IR-BIC Fasted5.56
Fesoterodine 4 mg 10% ER-BIC Fasted7.22
Fesoterodine 4 mg 15% ER-BIC Fasted10.89
Fesoterodine 4 mg 20% ER-BIC FastedNA
Fesoterodine 4 mg ER Tablet Fasted7.54
Fesoterodine 4 mg 10% ER-BIC Fed4.59

[back to top]

Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for Fesoterodine Metabolite (5-HMT)

(NCT01286454)
Timeframe: 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 24, 30, 36 and 48 hrs post dose

Interventionhr (Median)
Fesoterodine 4 mg IR-BIC Fasted1.0
Fesoterodine 4 mg 10% ER-BIC Fasted6.0
Fesoterodine 4 mg 15% ER-BIC Fasted6.0
Fesoterodine 4 mg 20% ER-BIC Fasted8.0
Fesoterodine 4 mg ER Tablet Fasted5.0
Fesoterodine 4 mg 10% ER-BIC Fed4.0

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time [AUC (0 - ∞)] for Fesoterodine Metabolite (5-hydroxymethyltolterodine [5-HMT])

AUC (0 - ∞) = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero to extrapolated infinite time (0 - ∞). It is obtained from AUC (0 - t) plus AUC (t - ∞). (NCT01286454)
Timeframe: 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 24, 30, 36 and 48 hours (hrs) post dose

Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Fesoterodine 4 mg IR-BIC Fasted30.48
Fesoterodine 4 mg 10% ER-BIC Fasted28.24
Fesoterodine 4 mg 15% ER-BIC Fasted19.64
Fesoterodine 4 mg 20% ER-BIC FastedNA
Fesoterodine 4 mg ER Tablet Fasted27.40
Fesoterodine 4 mg 10% ER-BIC Fed32.07

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for Fesoterodine Metabolite (5-HMT)

Area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero to the last measured concentration (AUClast) of 5-HMT. (NCT01286454)
Timeframe: 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 24, 30, 36 and 48 hrs post dose

Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Fesoterodine 4 mg IR-BIC Fasted30.23
Fesoterodine 4 mg 10% ER-BIC Fasted27.79
Fesoterodine 4 mg 15% ER-BIC Fasted17.92
Fesoterodine 4 mg 20% ER-BIC Fasted7.59
Fesoterodine 4 mg ER Tablet Fasted26.80
Fesoterodine 4 mg 10% ER-BIC Fed31.88

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12

UUI episodes were defined as those with the urinary sensation scale (USS) rating of 5 in the diary. USS range from 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. (NCT01302054)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionepisodes per 24 hours (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 12
Fesoterodine3.93-2.32
Placebo3.83-1.76

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With No UUI Episodes (Diary Dry Rate)

UUI episodes were defined as those with the urinary sensation scale (USS) rating of 5 in the diary. USS range from 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. (NCT01302054)
Timeframe: Week 4, Week 12

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4Week 12
Fesoterodine25.439.0
Placebo17.732.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) at Week 12

"UPS: single-item, self-administered validated questionnaire. Participant answered: Which of the following would typically describe your experience when you have a desire to urinate? on a 3-point scale, 1=usually not able to hold urine; 2=usually able to hold urine (without leaking) until I reach a toilet if I go to the toilet immediately; 3= usually able to finish what I am doing before going to the toilet (without leaking). Change = observation minus baseline. Results categorized as Deterioration (Negative change); no change (Score change=0); improvement (Positive change)." (NCT01302054)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline: Not able to hold urineBaseline:Able to hold urine until I reach a toiletBaseline:Able to finish what I am doingChange at Week 12: DeteriorationChange at Week 12: No ChangeChange at Week 12: Improvement
Fesoterodine126158717167107
Placebo99157113115878

[back to top]

Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours

UUI episodes were defined as those with the urinary sensation scale (USS) rating of 5 in the diary. USS range from 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. (NCT01302054)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionepisodes per 24 hours (Mean)
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Baseline3.93
Fesoterodine: Double-Blind Week 121.60

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With More Than (>) 50 Percent (%) Reduction in UUI Episodes at Week 12 as Compared to Baseline

UUI episodes were defined as those with the urinary sensation scale (USS) rating of 5 in the diary. USS range from 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. (NCT01302054)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine69.9
Placebo57.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With More Than (>) 50 Percent (%) Reduction in UUI Episodes at Week 12 as Compared to Week -2

UUI episodes were defined as those with the urinary sensation scale (USS) rating of 5 in the diary. USS range from 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. (NCT01302054)
Timeframe: Week -2, Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine72.8
Placebo59.6

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12

"PPBC: single-item, self-administered validated questionnaire. Participant answered: Which of the following statements describes your bladder condition best at the moment? on a 6-point scale, 1=no problems at all; 2=some very minor problems; 3=some minor problems; 4=some moderate problems; 5=severe problems; 6=many severe problems. Change=observation minus baseline. Results categorized as Deterioration (Positive change from baseline); No Change (scores change=0); Minor Improvement (negative score change in magnitude of 1); Major Improvement (negative score change in magnitude of >=2)." (NCT01302054)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline: No Problems at allBaseline: Some Very Minor ProblemsBaseline: Some Minor ProblemsBaseline: Some Moderate ProblemsBaseline: Severe ProblemsBaseline: Many Severe ProblemsChange at Week 12: DeteriorationChange at Week 12: No ChangeChange at Week 12: Minor ImprovementChange at Week 12: Major Improvement
Fesoterodine04156014765178084110
Placebo069751413632958357

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score at Week 12

OAB-q: a self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire that assesses how much the participant has been bothered by selected bladder symptoms. Each item rated by participant on Likert scale 1 (not at all) to 6 (a very great deal). Symptom bother score derived as sum of scores for questions 1-8; lowest possible raw score: 8; highest possible score: 48. Data analyzed based on transformation of the score to a 0 to 100 scale [(Actual total raw score - lowest possible value of raw score)/range]*100. Higher scores values indicative of greater symptom bother. Change=observation minus baseline. (NCT01302054)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 12
Fesoterodine66.67-24.61
Placebo64.74-15.99

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 12

Micturitions include episodes of voluntary micturition and episodes of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI). UUI episodes were defined as those micturitions with USS rating of 5 in the diary in participants with UUI at baseline. USS rating 5: Unable to hold; leak urine. (NCT01302054)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionmicturitions per 24 hours (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 12
Fesoterodine12.44-1.94
Placebo12.48-1.57

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) at Week 12.

"UPS: single-item, self-administered validated questionnaire. Participant answered: Which of the following would typically describe your experience when you have a desire to urinate? on a 3-point scale, 1=usually not able to hold urine; 2=usually able to hold urine (without leaking) until I reach a toilet if I go to the toilet immediately; 3= usually able to finish what I am doing before going to the toilet (without leaking). Change = observation minus baseline. Results categorized as Deterioration (Negative change); no change (Score change=0); improvement (Positive change)." (NCT01302067)
Timeframe: Week 12

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
DeteriorationNo changeImprovement
Fesoterodine 4 Milligram (mg)37361302
Fesoterodine 8 mg30305342
Placebo23193132

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12.

PPBC: a self-administered, single-item, questionnaire that asks participants to describe their perception of their bladder-related problems. The PPBC assessment is rated on a 6-point scale: 1=no problems at all, 2=some very minor problems, 3=some minor problems, 4=moderate problems, 5=severe problems, 6=many severe problems. Improvement is defined as negative change from baseline. (NCT01302067)
Timeframe: Week 12

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
DeteriorationNo ChangeMinor improvementMajor improvement
Fesoterodine 4 Milligram (mg)38172210280
Fesoterodine 8 mg27151170329
Placebo2512210596

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Became Dry at Week 4.

Percentage of participants with no UUI episode for the three day diary, the numerator being the number of participants with no UUI at a visit and the denominator the total number of participants with UUI>0 at baseline. UUI episodes defined as those with USS rating of 5 (unable to hold; leak urine) in the diary (NCT01302067)
Timeframe: Week 4

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine 4 Milligram (mg)35.5
Placebo26.4
Fesoterodine 8 mg36.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Became Dry at Week 12.

Percentage of participants with no UUI episode for the three day diary, the numerator being the number of participants with no UUI at a visit and the denominator the total number of participants with UUI >0 at baseline. UUI episodes defined as those with USS rating of 5 (unable to hold; leak urine) in the diary. (NCT01302067)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine 4 Milligram (mg)49.2
Placebo39.5
Fesoterodine 8 mg57.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Percentage of UUI Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4.

UUI episodes were defined as those with the USS rating of 5 in the diary. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. (NCT01302067)
Timeframe: Week 4

InterventionEpisodes per 24 hours (Median)
Fesoterodine 4 Milligram (mg)-77.78
Placebo-60.50
Fesoterodine 8 mg-82.48

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Percentage of UUI Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12.

UUI episodes were defined as those with the USS rating of 5 in the diary. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. (NCT01302067)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionEpisodes per 24 hours (Median)
Fesoterodine 4 Milligram (mg)-93.75
Placebo-78.89
Fesoterodine 8 mg-100.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Percentage of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4.

Micturitions include episodes of voluntary micturition and episodes of UUI. (NCT01302067)
Timeframe: Week 4

InterventionEpisodes per 24 hours (Median)
Fesoterodine 4 Milligram (mg)-14.58
Placebo-9.01
Fesoterodine 8 mg-17.24

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Percentage of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 12.

Micturitions include episodes of voluntary micturition and episodes of UUI. (NCT01302067)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionEpisodes per 24 hours (Median)
Fesoterodine 4 Milligram (mg)-19.74
Placebo-12.16
Fesoterodine 8 mg-24.14

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of UUI Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 4.

UUI episodes were defined as those with the USS rating of 5 in the diary. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. (NCT01302067)
Timeframe: Week 4

InterventionEpisodes per 24 hours (Least Squares Mean)
Fesoterodine 4 Milligram (mg)-2.55
Placebo-1.99
Fesoterodine 8 mg-2.75

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12.

UUI episodes were defined as those with the Urinary Sensation Scale (USS) rating of 5 in the diary. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. (NCT01302067)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionEpisodes per 24 hours (Least Squares Mean)
Fesoterodine 4 Milligram (mg)-2.85
Placebo-2.22
Fesoterodine 8 mg-3.12

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 4.

Micturitions include episodes of voluntary micturition and episodes of UUI. (NCT01302067)
Timeframe: Week 4

InterventionEpisodes per 24 hours (Least Squares Mean)
Fesoterodine 4 Milligram (mg)-1.95
Placebo-1.19
Fesoterodine 8 mg-2.33

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 12.

Micturitions include episodes of voluntary micturition and episodes of UUI. (NCT01302067)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionEpisodes per 24 hours (Least Squares Mean)
Fesoterodine 4 Milligram (mg)-2.45
Placebo-1.58
Fesoterodine 8 mg-2.97

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score at Week 12.

OAB-q: a self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire that assesses how much the participant has been bothered by selected bladder symptoms. Each item rated by participant on Likert scale 1 (not at all) to 6 (a very great deal). Symptom bother score derived as sum of scores for questions 1-8; lowest possible raw score: 8; highest possible score: 48. Data analyzed based on transformation of the score to a 0 to 100 scale [(Actual total raw score - lowest possible value of raw score)/range]*100. Higher scores values indicative of greater symptom bother. (NCT01302067)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Fesoterodine 4 Milligram (mg)-30.19
Placebo-22.41
Fesoterodine 8 mg-34.88

[back to top]

Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) to Assess Bother From Urinary Frequency at Baseline and at 6 Weeks.

Overactive Bladder subjects answered the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) before starting Fesoterodine and at the end of taking 6 weeks of Fesoterodine. The OAB-q consists of 8 questions asking how bothered subject was in the past 4 weeks. Questions # 1 (Frequent urination during the daytime hours?); #5 (Nighttime urination?) and #6 (Waking up at night because you have to urinate?) are asking about frequency. Choices of answers are: 1 (Not at all); 2 (A little bit); 3 (Somewhat); 4 (Quite a bit); 5 (A great deal) 6 (A very great deal). Multiple responses to the questionnaire were averaged for each participant at baseline and at 6 weeks and then all participants' answers were totaled and averaged at baseline and at 6 weeks. (NCT01367886)
Timeframe: Outcome measure was assessed at baseline and after the 6 week visit.

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
OAB-q to assess bother from frequency at baselineOAB-q to assess bother from frequency at 6 weeks
Fesoterodine4.893.50

[back to top]

Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Will be Used to Assess Bother From Urinary Urgency at Baseline and at 6 Weeks..

Overactive bladder subjects answered the Overactive Bladder questionnaire (OAB-q) before starting Fesoterodine and at the end of taking 6 weeks of Fesoterodine. The OAB-q consists of 8 questions asking how bothered subject was in the past 4 weeks. Questions #2 (An uncomfortable urge to urinate?); #3 (A sudden urge to urinate with little or no warning?); #4 (Accidental loss of small amounts of urine?); #7 (An uncontrollable urge to urinate?); #8 (Urine loss associated with a strong desire to urinate?) are asking about urgency. Choices for answers are: 1 (Not at all); 2 (A little bit); 3 (Somewhat); 4 (Quite a bit); 5 (A great deal); 6 (A very great deal). Multiple responses to the questionnaire was averaged per participant at baseline and at 6 weeks and then all participants answers were totaled and then averaged at baseline and at 6 weeks. (NCT01367886)
Timeframe: Outcome measures were assessed at baseline and after the 6 week visit.

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
OAB-q to measure bother from urgency at baselineOAB-q to measure bther from urgency at 6 weeks
Fesoterodine4.523.14

[back to top]

Bladder Diary (Using Urinary Sensation Scale Found in Bladder Diary) to Assess Urinary Urgency at Baseline and at 6-week Treatment

The Urinary Sensation Scale found in the bladder diary given to subjects was used to assess urinary urgency. The Urinary Sensation Scale was filled out by the subject for 3 days before starting Fesoterodine and filled out again for 3 days at the end of taking 6 weeks of Fesoterodine. The scale ranges from 1 (no feeling of urgency), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe) to 5 (unable to hold; leak urine). The urgency scale with the most check marks per day over a period of 3 days before start of medication was averaged for each subject. The urgency scale with the most check marks per day over a period of 3 days at the end of taking 6 weeks of medication was averaged for each subject. Then, the average before start of medication for all subjects and the average at the end of taking 6 weeks of medication for all subjects were compared. (NCT01367886)
Timeframe: Outcome measure was assesses at baseline and at the end of the 6-week treatment period.

Interventionscores on Urinary Sensation Scale (Mean)
USS to assess baseline urgencyUSS to assess 6 week urgency
Fesoterodine2.842.50

[back to top]

Bladder Diary to Assess Urinary Frequency at Baseline and at End of 6-week Treatment

Overactive bladder subjects filled out a 3-day bladder diary before starting Fesoterodine and another 3-day bladder diary at the end of taking 6 weeks of Fesoterodine. The bladder diary was used to assess urinary frequency. The average number of urinations (frequency) per day over a period of 3 days before the start of medication and at the end of 6 weeks of medication were compared for each subject and then as a group. (NCT01367886)
Timeframe: Outcome measure was assessed at baseline and at the end of the 6-week treatment

Interventionurinations/day (Mean)
Average number of urinations/day after 6 weeksAverage number of urinations/day at baseline
Fesoterodine12.3210.79

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Maximum Cystometric Bladder Capacity at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase

Maximum cystometric bladder capacity (in milliliter) was defined as maximal tolerable cystometric capacity, until voiding or leaking begins or at a pressure of >=40 centimeter (cm) water (H2O). (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionmilliliter (Least Squares Mean)
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg58.12
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg83.36
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Oxybutynin87.17
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg23.49
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg Then 4 mg40.17

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Catheterizations Per 24 Hours at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase

The mean number of catheterizations per 24 hours were calculated as the total number of catheterizations divided by the total number of diary days collected at the assessment time point. Number of diary days collected at the assessment time point = number of calendar days when the diary was completed on; even if it was not a full 24 hours period. This outcome measure was only calculated for participants with >0 catheterizations at Baseline. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventioncatheterizations per 24 hours (Least Squares Mean)
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg-0.30
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg-0.32
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Oxybutynin-0.34
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg-0.10
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg Then 4 mg-0.22

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase

The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours were calculated as the total number of incontinence episodes divided by the total number of diary days collected at the assessment time point. Number of diary days collected at the assessment time point = number of calendar days when the diary was completed; even if it was not a full 24 hours period. This outcome measure was only calculated for participants with >0 incontinence episodes at Baseline. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionincontinence episodes per 24 hours (Least Squares Mean)
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg-0.46
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg-0.89
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Oxybutynin-1.01
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg-0.38
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg Then 4 mg-0.69

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions or Catheterizations Per 24 Hours at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase

The mean number of micturitions or catheterizations combined per 24 hours were calculated as the total number of micturitions and catheterizations combined divided by the total number of diary days collected at the assessment point. Number of diary days collected at the assessment time point = number of calendar days when the diary was completed; even if it was not a full 24 hour (hrs) period. This outcome was evaluated in those participants who had micturitions or catheterizations >0 at Baseline. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionmicturitions and catheterizations/24 hrs (Least Squares Mean)
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg-0.61
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg-0.60
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Oxybutynin-0.75
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg-0.24
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg Then 4 mg-0.28

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase

The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours were calculated as the total number of micturitions divided by the total number of diary days collected at the assessment time point. Number of diary days collected at the assessment time point = number of calendar days when the diary was completed on, even if it was not a full 24 hour period. This outcome measure was only calculated for participants with >0 micturitions at Baseline. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionmicturitions per 24 hours (Least Squares Mean)
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg-1.07
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg-0.68
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Oxybutynin-0.97
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg-0.37
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg Then 4 mg-0.70

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase

The mean number of urgency episodes per 24 hours were calculated as the total number of urgency episodes divided by the total number of diary days collected at the assessment time point. Number of diary days collected at the assessment time point = number of calendar days when the diary was completed; even if it was not a full 24 hours period. Urgency episodes were defined as urgency marked as 'yes' in the diary. This outcome measure was only calculated for participants with >0 urgency episodes at Baseline. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionurgency episodes per 24 hours (Least Squares Mean)
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg-0.62
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg-0.50
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Oxybutynin-0.14
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg-0.23
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg Then 4 mg-0.62

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase

The mean voided volume per micturition was calculated as sum of voided volume divided by the total number of micturition episodes with a recorded voided volume greater than 0. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionmilliliter per micturition (Least Squares Mean)
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg4.10
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg19.21
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Oxybutynin4.15
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg-12.72
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg Then 4 mg-8.41

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition or Catheterization at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase

The mean voided volume per micturition or catheterization was calculated as sum of voided volume divided by the total number of micturition or catheterization episodes with a recorded voided volume greater than 0. This outcome was evaluated in those participants who had micturitions or catheterizations >0 at Baseline. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

InterventionmL per micturition or catheterization (Least Squares Mean)
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg18.45
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg55.55
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Oxybutynin36.69
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg7.12
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg Then 4 mg-2.65

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Post-Void Residual Volume at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase

Post-void residual volume measurement was measured by an ultrasound. PVR volume was only assessed for participants who did not perform clean intermittent catheterization or in any participants who had >1 UTI during the study. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionmilliliter (Mean)
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg11.50
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 8 mg11.60
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg18.00
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg36.67
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg21.67
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg2.75

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities: Active Comparator/Efficacy Phase

Hematology: hemoglobin, hematocrit, erythrocytes <0.8*lower limit of normal (LLN), platelets<0.5*LLN>1.75*upper limit of normal (ULN), leukocytes <0.6*LLN>1.5*ULN, lymphocytes, neutrophils, <0.8*LLN >1.2*ULN, basophils, eosinophils, monocytes monocytes/leukocytes >1.2*ULN. Clinical chemistry: bilirubin, direct, bilirubin >1.5*ULN, aspartate aminotransferase (AT), alanine AT, gamma glutamyl transferase, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase>3.0*ULN, protein, albumin, phosphate <0.8*LLN >1.2*ULN, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine >1.3*ULN, urate >1.2*ULN, sodium<0.95*LLN>1.05*ULN, potassium, chloride, calcium bicarbonate<0.9*LLN>1.1*ULN, glucose<0.6*LLN>1.5*ULN, creatine kinase >2.0*ULN. Urinalysis: specific gravity <1.003>1.030, pH <4.5>8, urine glucose, ketones, urine protein, urine hemoglobin, urine bilirubin, nitrite, >=1, urine erythrocytes, urine leukocytes >=20, epithelial cells >=6, bacteria >20. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Week 1 up to Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg30
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg29
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Oxybutynin27
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg19
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg Then 4 mg19

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities: Safety Extension Phase

Hematology: hemoglobin, hematocrit, erythrocytes <0.8*lower limit of normal (LLN), platelets<0.5*LLN>1.75*upper limit of normal (ULN), leukocytes <0.6*LLN>1.5*ULN, lymphocytes, neutrophils, <0.8*LLN >1.2*ULN, basophils, eosinophils, monocytes monocytes/leukocytes >1.2*ULN. Clinical chemistry: bilirubin, direct, bilirubin >1.5*ULN, aspartate aminotransferase (AT), alanine AT, gamma glutamyl transferase, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase>3.0*ULN, protein, albumin, phosphate <0.8*LLN >1.2*ULN, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine >1.3*ULN, urate >1.2*ULN, sodium<0.95*LLN>1.05*ULN, potassium, chloride, calcium bicarbonate<0.9*LLN>1.1*ULN, glucose<0.6*LLN>1.5*ULN, creatine kinase >2.0*ULN. Urinalysis: specific gravity <1.003>1.030, pH <4.5>8, urine glucose, ketones, urine protein, urine hemoglobin, urine bilirubin, nitrite, >=1, urine erythrocytes, urine leukocytes >=20, epithelial cells >=6, bacteria >20. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Week 12 up to Week 26

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg19
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 8 mg22
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg7
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg12
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg15
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg21

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes in Physical Examination Findings From Baseline to Week 12: Active Comparator/Efficacy Phase

Physical examination included assessment of the general appearance and the skin, head, ears, eyes, nose, mouth, throat, respiratory, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal and neurological systems. Clinically relevant changes in physical findings were assessed by the investigator. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg2
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg1
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Oxybutynin1
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg1
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg Then 4 mg0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes in Physical Examination Findings From Baseline to Week 24: Safety Extension Phase

Physical examination included assessment of the general appearance and the skin, head, ears, eyes, nose, mouth, throat, respiratory, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal and neurological systems. Clinically relevant changes in physical findings were assessed by the investigator. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg3
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 8 mg2
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg0
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg0
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg0
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Urinary Tract Infections (UTI): Active Comparator/Efficacy Phase

Clinically significant UTI, counted as an adverse event was defined as: positive urine culture with a uropathogen (defined as >=10^5 colony forming unit per milliliter [CFU/mL]) and the presence of symptoms, or pyuria (defined as >50 white blood cells [WBC] per high-pass filter [hpf]) and the presence of symptoms, or positive urine culture with a uropathogen (defined as >=10^5 CFU/mL) with or without symptoms in a participant with a documented history of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Week 1 up to Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg4
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg1
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Oxybutynin4
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg3
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg Then 4 mg4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Urinary Tract Infections (UTI): Safety Extension Phase

Clinically significant UTI, counted as an adverse event was defined as: positive urine culture with a uropathogen (defined as >=10^5 CFU/mL) and the presence of symptoms, or pyuria (defined as >50 WBC per hpf and the presence of symptoms, or positive urine culture with a uropathogen (defined as >=10^5 CFU/mL) with or without symptoms in a participants with a documented history of VUR. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Week 12 up to Week 26

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg0
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 8 mg1
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg2
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg0
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg1
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg5

[back to top]

Volume of Distribution (Vd) of Fesoterodine

Volume of distribution is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired plasma concentration of a drug. PK analysis was not done separately for each dose of fesoterodine in respective cohorts and were combined for PK analysis using PK modelling approach. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Week 4, Day 1: pre-dose (when dose administered at clinic) or if dose taken at home up to 3 hours before coming to the clinic, sampling just after arrival at clinic, 5 hours post-dose, 8-10 hours post-dose (if participants remained at clinic)

Interventionliter (Mean)
Fesoterodine Pooled68.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase

CBCL: 120 items questionnaire answered by parent/caregiver of child to assess a child's behavioral, emotional problems. Scale for each item: 0= not true, 1= somewhat/sometimes true, 2= very true/often true. Out of 120 items, 103 were categorized into 8 domains; aggressive behavior, anxious/depressed, attention problems, rule-breaking behavior, social problems, somatic complaints, thought problems, withdrawn. Summary scores: Internalizing problems=anxious/depressed + withdrawn + somatic complaints; Externalizing problems=rule-breaking + aggressive behavior. Total problems=8 domains + other 17 items. Raw scores for each domain, summary and total problems=sum of scores of related items. Using Assessment Data Manager (ADM) tool raw scores transformed/derived into standard T-scores, range: each domain=50 to 100, internalizing problems=34 to 100, externalizing problems=33 to 100, total problems=24 to 100. Lower T-score for each 8 domains, 2 summary and total problems scores=better outcomes. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,
InterventionT score (Mean)
Aggressive behavior: BaselineAggressive behavior: Change at Week 12Anxious/depressed: BaselineAnxious/depressed: Change at Week 12Attention problems: BaselineAttention problems: Change at week 12Rule-breaking behavior: BaselineRule-breaking behavior: Change at Week 12Social problems : BaselineSocial problems : Change at Week 12Somatic complaints: BaselineSomatic complaints: Change at Week 12Thought problems: BaselineThought problems: Change at Week 12Withdrawn: BaselineWithdrawn: Change at Week 12Externalizing: BaselineExternalizing: Change at Week 12Internalizing: BaselineInternalizing: Change at Week 12Total Problems: BaselineTotal Problems: Change at Week 12
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg53.86-1.0356.07-1.7356.29-1.9753.26-0.9257.52-1.3561.14-0.4655.00-0.9254.600.3549.48-2.0856.45-2.1455.05-2.51
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg54.32-0.9557.00-1.3856.66-1.4053.80-0.8858.54-2.5560.46-1.2853.54-0.4857.54-1.2549.46-2.3355.93-2.3553.61-3.23
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Oxybutynin54.58-1.2856.75-1.9256.30-1.2853.43-0.7257.95-0.6760.58-0.8756.73-1.5958.25-1.9250.10-1.9557.25-3.0555.45-2.36
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg54.9-1.2955.5-0.7955.4-1.2954.5-1.7157.9-2.2157.1-0.3851.9-0.4255.7-1.7551.1-2.6353.9-1.9653.4-2.17
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg Then 4 mg52.8-0.0356.3-3.2155.3-1.4552.3-0.1055.8-1.1058.4-1.6954.9-1.3855.0-0.5948.0-1.4554.6-3.5252.7-3.38

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase

CBCL: 120 items questionnaire answered by parent/caregiver of child to assess a child's behavioral, emotional problems. Scale for each item: 0= not true, 1= somewhat/sometimes true, 2= very true/often true. Out of 120 items, 103 were categorized into 8 domains; aggressive behavior, anxious/depressed, attention problems, rule-breaking behavior, social problems, somatic complaints, thought problems, withdrawn. Summary scores: Internalizing problems=anxious/depressed + withdrawn + somatic complaints; Externalizing problems=rule-breaking + aggressive behavior. Total problems=8 domains + other 17 items. Raw scores for each domain, summary and total problems=sum of scores of related items. Using Assessment Data Manager (ADM) tool raw scores transformed/derived into standard T-scores, range: each domain=50 to 100, internalizing problems=34 to 100, externalizing problems=33 to 100, total problems=24 to 100. Lower T-score for each 8 domains, 2 summary and total problems scores=better outcomes. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,,,,
InterventionT score (Mean)
Aggressive behavior: Change at Week 24Anxious/depressed: Change at Week 24Attention problems: Change at Week 24Rule-breaking behavior: Change at Week 24Social problems : Change at Week 24Somatic complaints: Change at Week 24Thought problems: Change at Week 24Withdrawn: Change at Week 24Externalizing: Change at Week 24Internalizing: Change at Week 24Total Problems: Change at Week 24
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg-1.59-3.45-2.21-1.59-2.83-4.38-3.10-0.69-5.21-7.69-7.03
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 8 mg-1.31-2.31-2.64-1.47-2.56-2.64-1.03-1.50-2.89-4.14-4.44
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg-1.25-1.50-3.38-1.31-3.19-1.69-3.25-2.19-1.81-3.25-3.69
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg-2.40-3.25-1.70-0.90-2.65-1.50-2.30-4.35-4.15-5.35-4.90
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg-1.70-2.60-1.50-2.15-3.90-0.60-1.40-1.80-4.20-4.40-5.20
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg-1.86-3.89-1.71-0.36-2.36-1.96-1.75-0.43-4.21-4.32-5.25

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase

CBCL: It consisted of 120 items on behavior and emotional problems. Parent/caregiver of child answered 120 items, each on scale: 0= not true, 1= somewhat/sometimes true, 2= very/often true. 103 items were classified in 8 domains: aggressive behavior: total score range (TSR)= 0 to 36, anxious/depressed: TSR= 0 to 26, attention problems: TSR= 0 to 20, rule-breaking behavior: TSR= 0 to 34, social problems: TSR= 0 to 22, somatic complaints: TSR= 0 to 22, thought problems: TSR= 0 to 30, withdrawn (TSR)= 0 to 16. Rule-breaking and aggressive behavior summarized to externalizing problems with a TSR= 0 to 70. Anxious/depressed, withdrawn, somatic complaints summarized to internalizing problems with a TSR= 0 to 64. All 103 items of 8 domains and other 17 remaining items were combined to give total problems TSR = 0 to 240. TSR for each domain, summary and total problems was sum of scores of related items respectively. Lower scores for each domain, summary and total problems= better outcomes. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Aggressive behavior: BaselineAggressive behavior: Change at Week 12Anxious/depressed: BaselineAnxious/depressed: Change at Week 12Attention problems: BaselineAttention problems: Change at Week 12Rule-breaking behavior: BaselineRule-breaking behavior: Change at Week 12Social problems: BaselineSocial problems: Change at Week 12Somatic complaints: BaselineSomatic complaints: Change at Week 12Thought problems: BaselineThought problems: Change at Week 12Withdrawn: BaselineWithdrawn: Change at Week 12Externalizing: BaselineExternalizing: Change at Week 12Internalizing: BaselineInternalizing: Change at Week 12Total Problems: BaselineTotal Problems: Change at Week 12
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg4.19-0.623.83-0.974.79-1.051.64-0.433.60-0.543.40-0.052.05-0.461.520.145.83-1.058.76-0.8931.52-4.92
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg4.66-0.904.20-0.734.49-0.731.66-0.304.07-1.133.46-0.531.46-0.102.49-0.356.32-1.2010.15-1.7031.88-5.83
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Oxybutynin4.88-0.974.10-1.054.85-0.771.70-0.383.80-0.263.40-0.512.58-0.512.75-0.646.53-1.3110.25-2.2134.18-5.85
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg5.1-0.923.8-0.584.2-0.711.9-0.633.9-0.832.1-0.041.0-0.211.7-0.506.9-1.547.5-1.1329.5-5.33
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg Then 4 mg3.5-0.174.0-1.483.9-0.831.00.523.2-0.622.6-0.552.0-0.451.6-0.174.5-0.318.2-2.2127.0-5.10

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase

CBCL: It consisted of 120 items on behavior and emotional problems. Parent/caregiver of child answered 120 items, each on scale: 0= not true, 1= somewhat/sometimes true, 2= very/often true. 103 items were classified in 8 domains: aggressive behavior: total score range (TSR)= 0 to 36, anxious/depressed: TSR= 0 to 26, attention problems: TSR= 0 to 20, rule-breaking behavior: TSR= 0 to 34, social problems: TSR= 0 to 22, somatic complaints: TSR= 0 to 22, thought problems: TSR= 0 to 30, withdrawn (TSR)= 0 to 16. Rule-breaking and aggressive behavior summarized to externalizing problems with a TSR= 0 to 70. Anxious/depressed, withdrawn, somatic complaints summarized to internalizing problems with a TSR= 0 to 64. All 103 items of 8 domains and other 17 remaining items were combined to give total problems TSR = 0 to 240. TSR for each domain, summary and total problems was sum of scores of related items respectively. Lower scores for each domain, summary and total problems= better outcomes. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Aggressive behavior: Change at Week 24Anxious/depressed: Change at Week 24Attention problems: Change at Week 24Rule-breaking behavior: Change at Week 24Social problems: Change at Week 24Somatic complaints: Change at Week 24Thought problems: Change at Week 24Withdrawn: Change at Week 24Externalizing: Change at Week 24Internalizing: Change at Week 24Total Problems: Change at Week 24
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg-1.34-1.93-1.41-0.62-1.28-1.34-1.31-0.24-1.97-3.52-10.90
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 8 mg-1.17-1.28-1.36-0.50-1.19-0.89-0.36-0.44-1.67-2.61-8.58
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg-0.81-1.06-1.94-0.50-1.13-0.88-1.06-0.69-1.19-2.63-9.00
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg-1.75-1.60-1.25-0.55-1.20-0.45-0.90-1.35-2.30-3.40-10.10
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg-1.40-1.70-1.15-0.80-1.65-0.15-0.65-0.45-2.20-2.30-9.45
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg-1.57-1.75-0.89-0.18-1.14-0.68-0.64-0.14-1.79-2.57-8.39

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Dropped Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 10 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase

The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. It consisted of a small board of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. Pegs with a key along one side must be rotated to match the hole before they can be inserted. Participants were asked to insert 10 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit (up to 300 seconds). In this outcome measure number of pegs dropped while putting in the holes were measured. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,
Interventionpegs (Mean)
Dominant hand: BaselineDominant hand: Change at Week 12Non-dominant hand: BaselineNon-dominant hand: Change at Week 12
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg0.110.290.440.43
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg0.750.571.221.00
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Oxybutynin0.29-0.170.000.17
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg0.390.000.350.00
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg Then 4 mg0.100.050.760.60

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Dropped Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 10 Pegs Group at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase

The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. It consisted of a small board of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. Pegs with a key along one side must be rotated to match the hole before they can be inserted. Participants were asked to insert 10 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit (up to 300 seconds). In this outcome measure number of pegs dropped while putting in the holes were measured. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,,,,
Interventionpegs (Mean)
Dominant hand: Change at week 24Non-dominant hand: Change at week 24
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg0.331.33
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 8 mg0.430.00
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg0.000.50
Cohort 1,SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 8 mg-0.330.00
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg-0.27-0.36
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg-0.060.11

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Dropped Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 25 Pegs Group at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase

The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. It consisted of a small board of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. Pegs with a key along one side must be rotated to match the hole before they can be inserted. Participants were asked to insert 25 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit (up to 300 seconds). In this outcome measure number of pegs dropped while putting in the holes were measured. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,,,,
Interventionpegs (Mean)
Dominant hand: Change at Week 24Non-dominant hand: Change at Week 24
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg0.00-0.28
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 8 mg0.630.68
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg0.140.00
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg0.250.27
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg0.000.60
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg0.44-0.13

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Placed Correctly Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 10 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase

The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. It consisted of a small board of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. Pegs with a key along one side must be rotated to match the hole before they can be inserted. Participants were asked to insert 10 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit (up to 300 seconds). In this outcome measure number of pegs placed correctly while putting in the holes were measured. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,
Interventionpegs (Mean)
Dominant hand: BaselineDominant hand: Change at Week 12Non-dominant hand: BaselineNon-dominant hand: Change at Week 12
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg9.56-0.299.56-0.57
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg9.380.009.000.00
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Oxybutynin10.000.0010.000.00
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg9.890.009.82-0.07
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg Then 4 mg10.0-0.119.620.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Placed Correctly Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 10 Pegs Group at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase

The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. It consisted of a small board of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. Pegs with a key along one side must be rotated to match the hole before they can be inserted. Participants were asked to insert 10 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit (up to 300 seconds). In this outcome measure number of pegs placed correctly while putting in the holes were measured. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,,,,
Interventionpegs (Mean)
Dominant hand: Change at Week 24Non-dominant hand: Change at Week 24
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg-0.33-1.33
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 8 mg0.000.00
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg0.000.00
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg0.000.00
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg0.070.14
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg0.000.21

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Placed Correctly Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 25 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase

The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. It consisted of a small board of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. Pegs with a key along one side must be rotated to match the hole before they can be inserted. Participants were asked to insert 25 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit (up to 300 seconds). In this outcome measure number of pegs placed correctly while putting in the holes were measured. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,
Interventionpegs (Mean)
Dominant hand: BaselineDominant hand: Change at Week 12Non-dominant hand: BaselineNon-dominant hand: Change at Week 12
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg25.00-0.0724.450.53
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg24.560.4224.750.26
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Oxybutynin25.00-0.1224.880.03
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg25.00-0.1324.500.63
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg Then 4 mg23.220.1124.25-0.63

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Placed Correctly Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 25 Pegs Group at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase

The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. It consisted of a small board of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. Pegs with a key along one side must be rotated to match the hole before they can be inserted. Participants were asked to insert 25 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit (up to 300 seconds). In this outcome measure number of pegs placed correctly while putting in the holes were measured. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,,,,
Interventionpegs (Mean)
Dominant hand: Change at Week 24Non-dominant hand: Change at Week 24
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg0.000.60
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 8 mg0.500.21
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg0.000.14
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg0.000.00
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg0.000.60
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg0.11-0.50

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Post-Void Residual (PVR) Volume at Weeks 4, 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase

Post-void residual volume measurement was measured by an ultrasound. PVR volume was only assessed for participants who did not perform clean intermittent catheterization or in any participants who had >1 UTI during the study. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, 12

,,,,
Interventionmilliliter (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 4Change at Week 12
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg7.005.4025.60
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg9.57-7.33-4.00
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Oxybutynin5.7819.1112.86
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg14.7-2.002.50
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg Then 4 mg10.710.250.75

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Time to Completion Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 10 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase

The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. It consisted of a small board of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. Pegs with a key along one side must be rotated to match the hole before they can be inserted. In this outcome measure participants were asked to insert 10 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit (up to 300 seconds). The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. Time taken to complete the test was inversely correlated to the cognitive ability. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,
Interventionseconds (Mean)
Dominant hand: BaselineDominant hand: Change at Week 12Non-dominant hand: BaselineNon-dominant hand: Change at Week 12
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg61.11-7.7180.44-21.71
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg56.5010.14114.0015.33
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Oxybutynin46.43-5.3348.00-2.00
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg69.56-11.2091.29-19.36
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg Then 4 mg52.20-10.2676.29-3.25

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Time to Completion Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 10 Pegs Group at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase

The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. It consisted of a small board of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. Pegs with a key along one side must be rotated to match the hole before they can be inserted. In this outcome measure participants were asked to insert 10 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit (up to 300 seconds). The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. Time taken to complete the test was inversely correlated to the cognitive ability. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,,,,
Interventionseconds (Mean)
Dominant hand: Change at Week 24Non-dominant hand: Change at Week 24
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg-11.33-2.00
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 8 mg-3.71-4.00
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg-2.001.50
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg-6.33-11.00
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg-7.07-9.14
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg-15.00-18.47

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Time to Completion Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 25 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase

The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. It consisted of a small board of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. Pegs with a key along one side must be rotated to match the hole before they can be inserted. In this outcome measure participants were asked to insert 25 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit (up to 300 seconds). The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. Time taken to complete the test was inversely correlated to the cognitive ability. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,
Interventionseconds (Mean)
Dominant hand: BaselineDominant hand: Change at Week 12Non-dominant hand: BaselineNon-dominant hand: Change at Week 12
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg88.85-5.40110.61-9.10
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg92.15-8.88109.00-4.10
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Oxybutynin82.641.2192.94-1.97
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg106.7-14.38130.30-13.50
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg Then 4 mg124.7-18.44126.1-12.50

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Time to Completion Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 25 Pegs Group at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase

The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. It consisted of a small board of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. Pegs with a key along one side must be rotated to match the hole before they can be inserted. In this outcome measure participants were asked to insert 25 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit (up to 300 seconds). The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. Time taken to complete the test was inversely correlated to the cognitive ability. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,,,,
Interventionseconds (Mean)
Dominant hand: Change at Week 24Non-dominant hand: Change at Week 24
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg-8.20-9.24
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 8 mg-12.27-8.46
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg-5.71-3.79
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg-7.00-11.87
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg-38.20-38.00
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg-17.00-15.50

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Visual Accommodation at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase

The visual accommodation was the distance for each eye at which vision became blurred and was calculated as the mean of triplicate measurements. The participants focused on a single letter of the 20/40 line of an eye chart and chart was moved slowly towards the participant until letter was blurred. At this point, the distance from eye to letter was measured for each eye. In this outcome measure data have been reported for right and left eye separately. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,
Interventioncentimeter (Mean)
Right Eye: BaselineRight Eye: Change at Week 12Left Eye: BaselineLeft Eye: Change at Week 12
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg11.881.7412.310.27
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg15.947.7715.835.79
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Oxybutynin9.590.509.690.81
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg9.67-1.048.81-1.45
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg Then 4 mg8.171.028.040.90

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Visual Accommodation at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase

The visual accommodation is the distance for each eye at which vision became blurred and was calculated as the mean of triplicate measurements. The participants focused on a single letter of the 20/40 line of an eye chart and chart was moved slowly towards the participant until letter was blurred. At this point, the distance from eye to letter was measured for each eye. In this outcome measure data have been reported for right and left eye separately. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,,,,
Interventioncentimeter (Mean)
Right Eye: Change at Week 24Left Eye: Change at Week 24
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg0.730.90
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 8 mg4.333.79
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg1.501.66
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg0.500.58
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg-1.350.43
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg0.961.12

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase

Visual acuity (VA) was assessed using the Snellen method, where logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) units were derived from the Snellen ratios. Participants had to read letters from the chart at a distance of 20 feet/6 meter or 4 meter. VA/Snellen ratio = distance between the chart and participant, divided by the distance at which participant was able to see or read chart without impairment; expressed as decimal. logMAR = log10 (1/decimal VA). In this outcome measure data have been reported for right and left eye separately. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,
InterventionlogMAR unit (Mean)
Right Eye: BaselineRight Eye: Change at Week 12Left Eye: BaselineLeft Eye: Change at Week 12
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg0.090.010.080.00
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg0.11-0.010.10-0.01
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Oxybutynin0.030.020.020.00
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg0.150.030.16-0.02
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg Then 4 mg0.10-0.000.140.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity at Week 24: Safety Extension Phase

VA was assessed using the Snellen method, where logMAR units were derived from the Snellen ratios. Participants had to read letters from the chart at a distance of 20 feet/6 meter or 4 meter. VA/Snellen ratio = distance between the chart and participant, divided by the distance at which participant was able to see or read chart without impairment; expressed as decimal. logMAR = log10 (1/decimal VA). In this outcome measure data have been reported for right and left eye separately. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,,,,
InterventionlogMAR unit (Mean)
Right Eye: Change at Week 24Left Eye: Change at Week 24
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg0.040.01
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 8 mg-0.02-0.01
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg-0.010.00
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg0.02-0.04
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg0.00-0.02
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg0.010.03

[back to top]

Number of Participants Meeting Pre-defined Criteria for Vital Signs Values From Baseline Through Week 12: Active Comparator/Efficacy Phase

Pre-defined criteria for vital signs: 1) a) systolic blood pressure (SBP) of <90 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), b) change >=30 mmHg increase, c) change >=30 mmHg decrease; 2) a) diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of <50 mmHg, b) change >=20 mmHg increase, c) change >=20 mmHg decrease; 3) a) pulse rate value of <40 beats per minute (bpm), b) pulse rate value >120 bpm. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 12

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SBP: <90 mmHgSBP: Change >=30 mmHg increaseSBP: Change >=30 mmHg decreaseDBP: <50 mmHgDBP: Change >=20 mmHg increaseDBP: Change >=20 mmHg decreasePulse rate: <40 bpmPulse rate: >120 bpm
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg21121102
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg22012104
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Oxybutynin01021100
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg70033202
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg Then 4 mg41014003

[back to top]

Number of Participants Meeting Pre-defined Criteria for Vital Signs Values From Baseline Through Week 24: Safety Extension Phase

Pre-defined criteria for vital signs: 1) a) systolic blood pressure (SBP) of <90 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), b) change >=30 mmHg increase, c) change >=30 mmHg decrease; 2) a) diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of <50 mmHg, b) change >=20 mmHg increase, c) change >=20 mmHg decrease; 3) a) pulse rate value of <40 beats per minute (bpm), b) pulse rate value >120 bpm. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 24

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SBP: <90 mmHgSBP: Change >=30 mmHg increaseSBP: Change >=30 mmHg decreaseDBP: <50 mmHgDBP: Change >=20 mmHg increaseDBP: Change >=20 mmHg decreasePulse rate: <40 bpmPulse rate: >120 bpm
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg01001100
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 8 mg30120000
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg20000000
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg10000000
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg40021000
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg20002001

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline at Week 12 in Involuntary Detrusor Contractions (IDC): Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase

In this outcome measure, shift data have been reported using 4 categories: (1) number of participants who did not have IDC at Baseline and at Week 12, (2) number of participants who did not have IDC at Baseline but had IDC at Week 12, (3) number of participants who had IDC at Baseline but no IDC at Week 12, and (4) number of participants who had IDC at Baseline and at Week 12. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline IDC = No; Week 12 IDC = NoBaseline IDC = No; Week 12 IDC = YesBaseline IDC = Yes; Week 12 IDC = NoBaseline IDC = Yes; Week 12 IDC = Yes
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg122918
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg411818
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Oxybutynin601418
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg00619
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg Then 4 mg101116

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational product without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; medically important events. A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state. AEs included both all serious and non-serious adverse events. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 12

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment Emergent AEsTreatment Emergent SAEs
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg263
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg202
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Oxybutynin301
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg192
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg Then 4 mg182

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Number of Pegs Dropped Assessment of Grooved Pegboard Test, 25 Pegs Group at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase

The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. It consisted of a small board of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. Pegs with a key along one side must be rotated to match the hole before they can be inserted. Participants were asked to insert 25 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit (up to 300 seconds). In this outcome measure number of pegs dropped while putting in the holes were measured. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,
Interventionpegs (Mean)
Dominant hand: BaselineDominant hand: Change at Week 12Non-dominant hand: BaselineNon-dominant hand: Change at Week 12
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg0.450.000.91-0.33
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg0.24-0.180.280.06
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Oxybutynin0.240.090.360.21
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg0.100.000.400.13
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg Then 4 mg0.110.440.130.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Volume Voided Per Catheterization at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase

The mean volume per catheterization was calculated as sum of voided volume divided by the total number of catheterization, with a recorded voided volume greater than 0. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionmilliliter per catheterization (Least Squares Mean)
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg29.47
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg47.18
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Oxybutynin45.90
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg11.50
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg Then 4 mg1.74

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Safety Extension Phase

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational product without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; medically important events. A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state. AEs included both all serious and non-serious adverse events. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Week 12 up to Week 26 (including 2 weeks of follow up after last dose)

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment emergent AEsTreatment emergent SAEs
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase (SEP): Fesoterodine 8 mg132
Cohort 1, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg140
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg90
Cohort 1, SEP: Oxybutynin Then Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg110
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg110
Cohort 2, Safety Extension Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg162

[back to top]

Absorption Rate Constant (Ka) of Fesoterodine

Absorption rate constant is used to determine rate at which drug is entering into body. Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was not done separately for each dose of fesoterodine in respective cohorts and were combined for PK analysis using PK modelling approach. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Week 4, Day 1: pre-dose (when dose administered at clinic) or if dose taken at home up to 3 hours before coming to the clinic, sampling just after arrival at clinic, 5 hours post-dose, 8-10 hours post-dose (if participants remained at clinic)

Interventionper hour (Mean)
Fesoterodine Pooled0.0897

[back to top]

Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of Fesoterodine

Clearance determines the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. PK analysis was not done separately for each dose of fesoterodine in respective cohorts and were combined for PK analysis using PK modelling approach. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Week 4, Day 1: pre-dose (when dose administered at clinic) or if dose taken at home up to 3 hours before coming to the clinic, sampling just after arrival at clinic, 5 hours post-dose, 8-10 hours post-dose (if participants remained at clinic)

Interventionliter per hour (Mean)
Fesoterodine Pooled71.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Bladder Compliance at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase

Bladder compliance was defined as change in bladder volume in milliliter (mL) divided by change in bladder pressure in cm H2O (during the same time when change in bladder volume was estimated). (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

InterventionmL per cm H2O (Least Squares Mean)
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg6.40
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg5.41
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Oxybutynin11.36
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg12.44
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg Then 4 mg16.44

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Bladder Volume at First Involuntary Detrusor Contraction (IDC) at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase

Bladder volume (in milliliter) at first IDC was measured using urodynamic testing. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionmilliliter (Least Squares Mean)
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg30.53
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg26.06
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Oxybutynin41.31
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg23.80
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg Then 4 mg31.26

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Detrusor Pressure at Maximum Bladder Capacity at Week 12: Active Comparator Phase/Efficacy Phase

Detrusor pressure (in cm H2O) at maximum urinary bladder capacity was measured using urodynamic testing. (NCT01557244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventioncm H2O (Least Squares Mean)
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg-2.86
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Fesoterodine 4 mg Then 8 mg-1.57
Cohort 1, Active Comparator Phase: Oxybutynin-2.39
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg-2.74
Cohort 2, Efficacy Phase: Fesoterodine 2 mg Then 4 mg-9.73

[back to top]

Percentage With Moderate to Severe Anticipated Drug Associated Adverse Events

Outcome was defined as moderate to severe anticipated adverse events (AE) based on the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Each AE is graded 1-5 with Grade 1=mild AE, Grade 2=moderate AE, Grade 3=severe AE, Grade 4=life-threatening or disabling AE, grade 5=Death-related to AE. Any side effect grade >= 2 considered a moderate to severe AE. Anticipated AEs included dizziness, somnolence, insomnia, confusion, cognitive impairment, dry eyes, blurry vision, dry mouth, constipation, nausea, dyspepsia and urinary retention. Example: dry mouth grades per CTCAE: Grade 1=symptomatic without significant dietary alteration; unstimulated saliva flow > 0.2 mL/min; Grade 2=symptomatic and significant oral intake alteration; unstimulated saliva flow 0.1 to 0.2 mL/min; Grade 3=symptoms leading to inability to adequately aliment orally; IV fluids, tube feedings or total parenteral nutrition indicated; unstimulated saliva < 0.1 mL/min. (NCT01786967)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Extensive Metabolizers14.8
Poor Metabolizers0.0

[back to top]

Percentage With Treatment Success

"Treatment Success (Yes/No) was defined by the Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS). TBS is a 4-point scale which was dichotomized into Yes/No for the Treatment Success outcome. The scale asks participants to rate My condition has been improved: 1= greatly improved, 2=improved, 3=not changed, 4= worsened. If a participant responded 1 (greatly improved) or 2 (improved), they were considered as a Yes for Treatment Success. If a participant responded 3 (not changed) or 4 (worsened), then they were considered as a No for Treatment Success." (NCT01786967)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Extensive Metabolizers74.1
Poor Metabolizers75.0

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score at 12 Weeks

Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) measured general cognitive functioning: orientation, memory, attention, concentration, naming, repetition, comprehension, and ability to create a sentence and to copy two intersecting polygons. Total score derived from sub-scores; total ranged from 0 to 30, higher score indicates better cognitive state. Mean change from baseline in the MMSE score at 12 weeks was presented along with the corresponding standard deviation. (NCT01936870)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

InterventionScale (Mean)
Fesoterodine Fumarate0.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) at 12 Weeks

Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) was defined as the sum score (0 to 15) of the following four OAB symptoms: daytime frequency (2 at maximum), nighttime frequency (3 at maximum), urgency (5 at maximum), and urgency incontinence (5 at maximum). Higher score indicates worse symptoms. Mean change from baseline in the OABSS at 12 weeks was presented along with the corresponding standard deviation. (NCT01936870)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

InterventionScale (Mean)
Fesoterodine Fumarate-3.4

[back to top]

Clinical Efficacy Rate

Clinical efficacy rate, which was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved clinical effectiveness over the total number of assessable effectiveness analysis population, was presented along with the corresponding 2-sided 95% CI. Overall effectiveness of fesoterodine fumarate was determined by the investigator based on clinical symptoms and examinations. Clinical effectiveness was assessed according to the following categories: (1) effective, (2) ineffective, or (3) unassessable at week 12 of the treatment. (NCT01936870)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine Fumarate74.8

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Satisfaction Rate

Satisfaction rate, which was defined as the percentage of participants who were satisfied by fesoterodine fumarate treatment over the total number of assessable effectiveness analysis population, was presented along with the corresponding 2-sided 95% CI. Satisfaction scale was assessed by the participants according to the following categories: (1) satisfied, (2) unsatisfied, (3) uncertain, or (4) unconfirmed. (NCT01936870)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Fesoterodine Fumarate59.0

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in Visual Accommodation at Week 12: Study A0221109

The visual accommodation was the minimum focusing distance for each eye at which vision became blurred - the mean of triplicate measurements. The participants focused on a single letter of the 20/40 line of an eye chart and chart was moved slowly towards the participant until letter was blurred. At this point, the distance from eye to letter was measured for each eye. In this outcome measure data have been reported for right and left eye separately. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Week 12

,,
Interventioncentimeter (Mean)
Right Eye: BaselineRight Eye: Change at Week 12Left Eye: BaselineLeft Eye: Change at Week 12
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule8.625.869.863.24
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule5.566.674.8316.17
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet9.332.5014.00-1.83

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Visual Accommodation at Week 28: Study A0221109

The visual accommodation was the minimum focusing distance for each eye at which vision became blurred - the mean of triplicate measurements. The participants focused on a single letter of the 20/40 line of an eye chart and chart was moved slowly towards the participant until letter was blurred. At this point, the distance from eye to letter was measured for each eye. In this outcome measure data have been reported for right and left eye separately. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Week 28

,,
Interventioncentimeter (Mean)
Right EyeLeft Eye
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule0.78-0.39
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule-0.110.50
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet5.173.17

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Vital Sign (Pulse Rate) at Final Visit: Study A0221109

Pulse rate was evaluated for examination of vital signs. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Final visit (Week 28 for participants who completed the study or in case of early withdrawal the last assessment before Week 28 was considered to be the final visit)

Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet-3.5
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule-1.4
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule-3.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions or Catheterizations Combined Per 24 Hours at Week 12 of Study A0221047 and at Week 28 and Final Visit of Study A0221109

The mean number of micturitions and catheterizations combined per 24 hours were calculated as the total number of micturitions and catheterizations combined divided by the total number of diary days collected at the assessment point. Number of diary days collected at the assessment time point = number of calendar days when the diary was completed, even if it was not a full 24 hour (hr) period. This outcome measure was only calculated for participants with >0 micturitions or catheterizations at Baseline. Data was summarized for each cohort, each treatment group and total of treatment groups, using the merged data of studies A0221047 and A0221109 as planned. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: Study A0221047: Baseline, Week 12; Study A0221109: Week 28, Final Visit (Week 28 for participants who completed the study or in case of early withdrawal the last assessment before Week 28 was considered to be the final visit)

,,,,,
Interventionmicturitions or catheterizations/24 hr (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 12Change at Week 28Change at Final Visit
Cohort 15.330.000.330.33
Cohort 26.30-0.55-0.57-0.55
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule6.86-0.83-0.92-0.83
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule5.000.110.110.11
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet5.330.000.330.33
Total of Treatment Groups6.14-0.46-0.41-0.40

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Vital Sign (Pulse Rate) at Week 12: Study A0221109

Pulse rate was evaluated for examination of vital signs. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet0.0
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule2.4
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule-8.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Vital Sign (Pulse Rate) at Week 28: Study A0221109

Pulse rate was evaluated for examination of vital signs. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Week 28

Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet-3.5
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule-2.7
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule-3.7

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Event Urinary Tract Infections (UTI): Merged Data of Studies A0221047 and A0221109

UTI data were summarized for each cohort, each treatment group and the total of treatment groups, using the merged data of studies A0221047 and A0221109 as planned. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: Up to a maximum of 56 weeks (24 weeks of treatment in A0221047 and 32 weeks [28 weeks treatment + 4 weeks follow up post last dose] in A0221109)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort 10
Cohort 21
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet0
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule1
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule0
Total of Treatment Groups1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities

Hematology: hemoglobin, hematocrit, erythrocytes <0.8*lower limit of normal (LLN); platelets<0.5*LLN>1.75*upper limit of normal (ULN); leukocytes <0.6*LLN>1.5*ULN; lymphocytes, neutrophils <0.8*LLN >1.2*UL; basophils, eosinophils, monocytes >1.2*ULN. Clinical chemistry: bilirubin, direct bilirubin >1.5*ULN; aspartate aminotransferase (AT), alanine AT, gamma glutamyl transferase, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase >3.0*ULN; protein, albumin <0.8*LLN >1.2*ULN; blood urea nitrogen, creatinine >1.3*ULN; urate >1.2*ULN, sodium<0.95*LLN>1.05*ULN; potassium, chloride, bicarbonate <0.9*LLN>1.1*ULN; glucose <0.6*LLN>1.5*ULN; creatine kinase >2.0*ULN. Urinalysis: specific gravity <1.003>1.030, pH <4.5>8, glucose, ketones, protein, hemoglobin, nitrite, leukocyte esterase >=1; erythrocytes, leukocytes >=20; epithelial cells >=6, bacteria >20, hyaline casts >1. Data for this outcome was planned to be analysed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline to 28 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet2
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule6
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Bladder Compliance at Week 12 of Study A0221047 and at Week 28 and Final Visit of Study A0221109

Bladder compliance was defined as change in bladder volume in milliliter (mL) divided by change in bladder pressure in cm H2O (during the same time when change in bladder volume was estimated). Bladder Compliance was summarized for each cohort, each treatment group and total of treatment groups, using the merged data of studies A0221047 and A0221109 as planned. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: Study A0221047: Baseline, Week 12; Study A0221109: Week 28, Final Visit (Week 28 for participants who completed the study or in case of early withdrawal the last assessment before Week 28 was considered to be the final visit)

,,,,,
Interventionmilliliter per cm H2O (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 12Change at Week 28Change at Final Visit
Cohort 17.009.008.658.65
Cohort 26.9720.0613.2213.22
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule8.1623.3413.1813.18
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule4.2012.4013.3013.30
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet7.009.008.658.65
Total of Treatment Groups6.9818.2212.3912.39

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Bladder Volume at First Involuntary Detrusor Contraction (IDC) at Week 12 of Study A0221047 and at Week 28 and Final Visit of Study A0221109

Bladder volume at first IDC was measured using urodynamic testing. Bladder volume at first IDC was summarized for each cohort, each treatment group and total of treatment groups, using the merged data of studies A0221047 and A0221109 as planned. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: Study A0221047: Baseline, Week 12; Study A0221109: Week 28, Final Visit (Week 28 for participants who completed the study or in case of early withdrawal the last assessment before Week 28 was considered to be the final visit)

,
Interventionmilliliter (Mean)
Baseline
Cohort 1175.0
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet175.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Bladder Volume at First Involuntary Detrusor Contraction (IDC) at Week 12 of Study A0221047 and at Week 28 and Final Visit of Study A0221109

Bladder volume at first IDC was measured using urodynamic testing. Bladder volume at first IDC was summarized for each cohort, each treatment group and total of treatment groups, using the merged data of studies A0221047 and A0221109 as planned. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: Study A0221047: Baseline, Week 12; Study A0221109: Week 28, Final Visit (Week 28 for participants who completed the study or in case of early withdrawal the last assessment before Week 28 was considered to be the final visit)

,,,
Interventionmilliliter (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 12Change at Week 28Change at Final Visit
Cohort 248.895.050.450.4
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule48.1113.838.638.6
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule50.370.070.070.0
Total of Treatment Groups60.395.050.450.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Final Visit: Study A0221109

CBCL: assessed child's behavioral and emotional problems. Parent/caregiver of child answered 120 items, each on scale: 0=not true, 1=somewhat/sometimes true, 2=very/often true. 103 items were categorized in 8 domains: aggressive behavior, anxious/depressed, attention problems, rule-breaking behavior, social problems, somatic complaints, thought problems, withdrawn. Summary scores: Internalizing problems =anxious/depressed+withdrawn+somatic complaints; Externalizing problems =rule-breaking+aggressive behavior. Total problems =8 domains+other 17 items. Raw scores for each domain, summary and total problems =sum of scores of related items. Using ADM tool raw scores transformed/derived into standard T-scores, range: each domain=50-100, internalizing problems=34-100, externalizing problems=33-100, total problems=24-100. Lower T-score (8 domain,2 summary,total problems)=better outcomes. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Final visit (Week 28 for participants who completed the study or in case of early withdrawal the last assessment before Week 28 was considered to be the final visit)

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Aggressive behaviorAnxious/depressedAttention problemsRule-breaking behaviorSocial problemsSomatic complaintsThought problemsWithdrawnExternalizing problemsInternalizing problemsTotal problems
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule-1.9-0.6-0.9-0.90.31.0-0.1-1.7-3.0-2.1-1.4
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule-0.30.30.01.31.0-2.3-0.30.00.0-2.71.0
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet0.00.00.0-0.50.00.00.00.0-3.00.0-2.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 12: Study A0221109

CBCL: assessed child's behavioral and emotional problems. Parent/caregiver of child answered 120 items, each on scale: 0=not true, 1=somewhat/sometimes true, 2=very/often true. 103 items were categorized in 8 domains: aggressive behavior, anxious/depressed, attention problems, rule-breaking behavior, social problems, somatic complaints, thought problems, withdrawn. Summary scores: Internalizing problems =anxious/depressed+withdrawn+somatic complaints; Externalizing problems =rule-breaking+aggressive behavior. Total problems =8 domains+other 17 items. Raw scores for each domain, summary and total problems =sum of scores of related items. Using ADM tool raw scores transformed/derived into standard T-scores, range: each domain=50-100, internalizing problems=34-100, externalizing problems=33-100, total problems=24-100. Lower T-score (8 domain,2 summary,total problems)=better outcomes. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Week 12

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Aggressive behavior: BaselineAggressive behavior: Change at Week 12Anxious/depressed: BaselineAnxious/depressed: Change at Week 12Attention problems: BaselineAttention problems: Change at week 12Rule-breaking behavior: BaselineRule-breaking behavior: Change at Week 12Social problems: BaselineSocial problems: Change at Week 12Somatic complaints: BaselineSomatic complaints: Change at Week 12Thought problems: BaselineThought problems: Change at Week 12Withdrawn: BaselineWithdrawn: Change at Week 12Externalizing problems: BaselineExternalizing problems: Change at Week 12Internalizing problems: BaselineInternalizing problems: Change at Week 12Total problems: BaselineTotal problems: Change at Week 12
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule52.6-0.152.10.753.6-1.152.4-0.352.40.053.40.950.90.353.4-1.747.6-0.349.00.449.1-1.1
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule50.70.050.7-0.753.30.053.30.054.30.755.7-2.353.00.052.70.044.00.047.7-4.046.70.3
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet50.00.050.00.050.00.050.50.050.00.051.51.550.00.050.00.037.00.036.03.030.53.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) T Score (Derived Score) at Week 28: Study A0221109

CBCL: assessed child's behavioral and emotional problems. Parent/caregiver of child answered 120 items, each on scale: 0=not true, 1=somewhat/sometimes true, 2=very/often true. 103 items were categorized in 8 domains: aggressive behavior, anxious/depressed, attention problems, rule-breaking behavior, social problems, somatic complaints, thought problems, withdrawn. Summary scores: Internalizing problems =anxious/depressed+withdrawn+somatic complaints; Externalizing problems =rule-breaking+aggressive behavior. Total problems =8 domains+other 17 items. Raw scores for each domain, summary and total problems =sum of scores of related items. Using ADM tool raw scores transformed/derived into standard T-scores, range: each domain=50-100, internalizing problems=34-100, externalizing problems=33-100, total problems=24-100. Lower T-score (8 domain,2 summary,total problems)=better outcomes. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Week 28

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Aggressive behaviorAnxious/depressedAttention problemsRule-breaking behaviorSocial problemsSomatic complaintsThought problemsWithdrawnExternalizing problemsInternalizing problemsTotal problems
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule-2.2-0.7-1.0-1.00.31.2-0.2-2.0-3.5-2.5-1.7
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule-0.30.30.01.31.0-2.3-0.30.00.0-2.71.0
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet0.00.00.0-0.50.00.00.00.0-3.00.0-2.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Total Score (Raw Score) at Final Visit: Study A0221109

CBCL:assessed child's behavioral and emotional problems. Parent/caregiver of child answered 120 items, each on scale:0=not true, 1=somewhat/sometimes true, 2=very/often true. 103 items were classified in 8 domains: aggressive behavior, total score range (TSR) =0-36; anxious/depressed,TSR=0-26; attention problems,TSR=0-20; rule-breaking behavior, TSR=0-34; social problems, TSR=0-22; somatic complaints, TSR=0-22; thought problems, TSR=0-30; withdrawn, TSR=0-16. Summary scores: externalizing problems combined rule-breaking and aggressive behavior,TSR=0-70; internalizing problems combined anxious/depressed, withdrawn and somatic complaints, TSR=0-64. Total problems combined 8 domains and 17 remaining items,TSR=0-240. TSR for each domain, summary and total problems was sum of scores of related items respectively. Lower scores for each domain, summary, total problems = better outcomes.Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Final visit (Week 28 for participants who completed the study or in case of early withdrawal the last assessment before Week 28 was considered to be the final visit)

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Aggressive behaviorAnxious/depressedAttention problemsRule-breaking behaviorSocial problemsSomatic complaintsThought problemsWithdrawnExternalizing problemsInternalizing problemsTotal problems
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule-1.6-0.3-0.4-0.10.10.3-0.1-0.4-1.7-0.4-2.3
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule-0.30.00.00.30.3-0.7-0.30.00.0-0.70.7
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet0.00.00.0-0.50.00.00.00.0-0.50.0-0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 12: Study A0221109

CBCL:assessed child's behavioral and emotional problems. Parent/caregiver of child answered 120 items, each on scale:0=not true, 1=somewhat/sometimes true, 2=very/often true. 103 items were classified in 8 domains: aggressive behavior, total score range (TSR) =0-36; anxious/depressed,TSR=0-26; attention problems,TSR=0-20; rule-breaking behavior, TSR=0-34; social problems, TSR=0-22; somatic complaints, TSR=0-22; thought problems, TSR=0-30; withdrawn, TSR=0-16. Summary scores: externalizing problems combined rule-breaking and aggressive behavior,TSR=0-70; internalizing problems combined anxious/depressed, withdrawn and somatic complaints, TSR=0-64. Total problems combined 8 domains and 17 remaining items,TSR=0-240. TSR for each domain, summary and total problems was sum of scores of related items respectively. Lower scores for each domain, summary, total problems = better outcomes.Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Week 12

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Aggressive behavior: BaselineAggressive behavior: Change at Week 12Anxious/depressed: BaselineAnxious/depressed: Change at Week 12Attention problems: BaselineAttention problems: Change at week 12Rule-breaking behavior: BaselineRule-breaking behavior: Change at Week 12Social problems: BaselineSocial problems: Change at Week 12Somatic complaints: BaselineSomatic complaints: Change at Week 12Thought problems: BaselineThought problems: Change at Week 12Withdrawn: BaselineWithdrawn: Change at Week 12Externalizing problems: BaselineExternalizing problems: Change at Week 12Internalizing problems: BaselineInternalizing problems: Change at Week 12Total problems: BaselineTotal problems: Change at Week 12
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule3.4-0.11.90.33.6-0.61.3-0.11.60.01.00.30.6-0.10.9-0.44.7-0.33.70.119.1-1.3
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule2.00.01.3-0.73.00.01.30.02.30.31.7-0.71.30.00.70.03.30.03.7-1.318.0-0.3
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet0.00.00.00.00.00.00.50.00.00.00.50.50.00.00.00.00.50.00.50.51.51.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Total Score (Raw Score) at Week 28: Study A0221109

CBCL:assessed child's behavioral and emotional problems. Parent/caregiver of child answered 120 items, each on scale:0=not true, 1=somewhat/sometimes true, 2=very/often true. 103 items were classified in 8 domains: aggressive behavior, total score range (TSR) =0-36; anxious/depressed,TSR=0-26; attention problems,TSR=0-20; rule-breaking behavior, TSR=0-34; social problems, TSR=0-22; somatic complaints, TSR=0-22; thought problems, TSR=0-30; withdrawn, TSR=0-16. Summary scores: externalizing problems combined rule-breaking and aggressive behavior,TSR=0-70; internalizing problems combined anxious/depressed, withdrawn and somatic complaints, TSR=0-64. Total problems combined 8 domains and 17 remaining items,TSR=0-240. TSR for each domain, summary and total problems was sum of scores of related items respectively. Lower scores for each domain, summary, total problems = better outcomes.Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Week 28

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Aggressive behaviorAnxious/depressedAttention problemsRule-breaking behaviorSocial problemsSomatic complaintsThought problemsWithdrawnExternalizing problemsInternalizing problemsTotal problems
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule-1.8-0.3-0.5-0.20.20.3-0.2-0.5-2.0-0.5-2.7
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule-0.30.00.00.30.3-0.7-0.30.00.0-0.70.7
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet0.00.00.0-0.50.00.00.00.0-0.50.0-0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Detrusor Pressure at Maximum Bladder Capacity at Week 12 of Study A0221047 and at Week 28 and Final Visit of Study A0221109

Detrusor pressure (cm H2O) at maximum urinary bladder capacity was measured using urodynamic testing. Detrusor pressure was summarized for each cohort, each treatment group and total of treatment groups, using the merged data of studies A0221047 and A0221109 as planned. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: Study A0221047: Baseline, Week 12; Study A0221109: Week 28, Final Visit (Week 28 for participants who completed the study or in case of early withdrawal the last assessment before Week 28 was considered to be the final visit)

,,,,,
Interventioncm H2O (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 12Change at Week 28Change at Final Visit
Cohort 129.0-5.5-7.0-7.0
Cohort 240.2-13.7-4.3-4.3
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule32.4-6.0-2.8-2.8
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule58.3-31.7-7.3-7.3
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet29.0-5.5-7.0-7.0
Total of Treatment Groups38.3-12.3-4.8-4.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (10 Pegs Group) at Final Visit- Number of Pegs Dropped: Study A0221109

The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. Participants were asked to insert 10 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit up to 300 seconds. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. Number of pegs dropped while putting in the holes were measured. Participants were assigned to either a 10 or 25-peg assessment based on their age. 10-peg assessment was done on participants below age of 9 years. In this outcome measure data for dominant and non-dominant hand have been reported separately. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of Study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, final visit (Week 28 for participants who completed the study or in case of early withdrawal the last assessment before Week 28 was considered to be the final visit)

,
Interventionpegs (Mean)
Dominant handNon-dominant hand
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule0.20.0
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule0.00.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (10 Pegs Group) at Final Visit- Number of Pegs Placed Correctly: Study A0221109

The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. Participants were asked to insert 10 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit (up to 300 seconds). The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. Number of pegs placed correctly in hole was measured. Participants were assigned to either a 10 or 25-peg assessment based on their age. 10-peg assessment was done on participants below age of 9 years. In this outcome measure data for dominant and non-dominant hand have been reported separately. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Final visit (Week 28 for participants who completed the study or in case of early withdrawal the last assessment before Week 28 was considered to be the final visit)

,
Interventionpegs (Mean)
Dominant handNon-dominant hand
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule0.00.0
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule0.00.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (10 Pegs Group) at Final Visit- Time to Completion: Study A0221109

The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. Participants were asked to insert 10 grooved pegs into holes within the given time limit up to 300 seconds. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. Time taken to complete the test was inversely correlated to the cognitive ability. Participants were assigned to either a 10 or 25-peg assessment based on their age. 10-peg assessment was done on participants below age of 9 years. In this outcome measure data for dominant and non-dominant hand have been reported separately. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Final visit (Week 28 for participants who completed the study or in case of early withdrawal the last assessment before Week 28 was considered to be the final visit)

,
Interventionseconds (Mean)
Dominant handNon-dominant hand
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule0.84.4
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule3.7-7.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (10 Pegs Group) at Week 12- Number of Pegs Dropped: Study A0221109

The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. Participants were asked to insert 10 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit up to 300 seconds. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. Number of pegs dropped while putting in the holes were measured. Participants were assigned to either a 10 or 25-peg assessment based on their age. 10-peg assessment was done on participants below age of 9 years. In this outcome measure data for dominant and non-dominant hand have been reported separately. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionpegs (Mean)
Dominant hand: BaselineDominant hand: Change at Week 12Non-dominant hand: BaselineNon-dominant hand: Change at Week 12
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule0.20.20.00.6
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule0.00.00.00.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (10 Pegs Group) at Week 12- Number of Pegs Placed Correctly: Study A0221109

The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. Participants were asked to insert 10 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit up to 300 seconds. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. Number of pegs placed correctly in hole was measured. Participants were assigned to either a 10 or 25-peg assessment based on their age. 10-peg assessment was done on participants below age of 9 years. In this outcome measure data for dominant and non-dominant hand have been reported separately. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionpegs (Mean)
Dominant hand: BaselineDominant hand: Change at Week 12Non-dominant hand: BaselineNon-dominant hand: Change at Week 12
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule10.00.010.00.0
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule10.00.010.00.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (10 Pegs Group) at Week 12- Time to Completion: Study A0221109

The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. Participants were asked to insert 10 grooved pegs into holes within the given time limit up to 300 seconds. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. Time taken to complete the test was inversely correlated to the cognitive ability. Participants were assigned to either a 10 or 25-peg assessment based on their age. 10-peg assessment was done on participants below age of 9 years. In this outcome measure data for dominant and non-dominant hand have been reported separately. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionseconds (Mean)
Dominant hand: BaselineDominant hand: Change at Week 12Non-dominant hand: BaselineNon-dominant hand: Change at Week 12
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule43.00.833.48.2
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule39.3-0.352.0-1.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (10 Pegs Group) at Week 28- Number of Pegs Dropped: Study A0221109

The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. Participants were asked to insert 10 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit up to 300 seconds. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. Number of pegs dropped while putting in the holes were measured. Participants were assigned to either a 10 or 25-peg assessment based on their age. 10-peg assessment was done on participants below age of 9 years. In this outcome measure data for dominant and non-dominant hand have been reported separately. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Week 28

,
Interventionpegs (Mean)
Dominant handNon-dominant hand
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule0.30.0
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule0.00.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (10 Pegs Group) at Week 28- Number of Pegs Placed Correctly: Study A0221109

The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. Participants were asked to insert 10 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit up to 300 seconds. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. Number of pegs placed correctly in hole was measured. Participants were assigned to either a 10 or 25-peg assessment based on their age. 10-peg assessment was done on participants below age of 9 years. In this outcome measure data for dominant and non-dominant hand have been reported separately. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Week 28

,
Interventionpegs (Mean)
Dominant handNon-dominant hand
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule0.00.0
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule0.00.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (10 Pegs Group) at Week 28- Time to Completion: Study A0221109

The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. Participants were asked to insert 10 grooved pegs into holes within the given time limit (up to 300 seconds). The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. Time taken to complete the test was inversely correlated to the cognitive ability. Participants were assigned to either a 10 or 25-peg assessment based on their age. 10-peg assessment was done on participants below age of 9 years. In this outcome measure data for dominant and non-dominant hand have been reported separately. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Week 28

,
Interventionseconds (Mean)
Dominant handNon-dominant hand
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule4.56.3
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule3.7-7.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity at Final Visit: Study A0221109

VA was assessed for each eye using the Snellen method, where logMAR units were derived from the Snellen ratios. Participants had to read letters from the chart at a distance of 20 feet/6 meter or 4 meter. VA (Snellen ratio) = distance between the chart and participant, divided by distance at which participant was able to see/read chart without impairment; expressed as decimal. logMAR = log10 (1/decimal VA). In this outcome measure, data have been reported for right and left eye separately. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Final visit (Week 28 for participants who completed the study or in case of early withdrawal the last assessment before Week 28 was considered to be the final visit)

,,
InterventionLogMAR (Mean)
Right EyeLeft Eye
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule0.020.04
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule0.020.16
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet0.000.31

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity at Week 12: Study A0221109

Visual acuity (VA) was assessed for each eye using the Snellen method, where logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) units were derived from the Snellen ratios. Participants had to read letters from the chart at a distance of 20 feet/6 meter or 4 meter. VA (Snellen ratio) = distance between the chart and participant, divided by distance at which participant was able to see/read chart without impairment; expressed as decimal. logMAR = log10 (1/decimal VA). In this outcome measure, data have been reported for right and left eye separately. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Week 12

,,
InterventionLogMAR (Mean)
Right Eye: BaselineRight Eye: Change at Week 12Left Eye: BaselineLeft Eye: Change at Week 12
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule0.04-0.030.040.03
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule0.280.040.630.07
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet0.270.140.450.03

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity at Week 28: Study A0221109

VA was assessed for each eye using the Snellen method, where logMAR units were derived from the Snellen ratios. Participants had to read letters from the chart at a distance of 20 feet/6 meter or 4 meter. VA (Snellen ratio) = distance between the chart and participant, divided by distance at which participant was able to see/read chart without impairment; expressed as decimal. logMAR = log10 (1/decimal VA). In this outcome measure, data have been reported for right and left eye separately. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Week 28

,,
InterventionLogMAR (Mean)
Right EyeLeft Eye
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule0.030.05
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule0.020.16
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet0.000.31

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Vital Sign (Blood Pressure) at Final Visit: Study A0221109

Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were evaluated for examination of vital signs. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Final visit (Week 28 for participants who completed the study or in case of early withdrawal the last assessment before Week 28 was considered to be the final visit)

,,
Interventionmillimeter of mercury (Mean)
Systolic blood pressureDiastolic blood pressure
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule5.14.6
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule9.710.7
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet8.512.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Vital Sign (Blood Pressure) at Week 12: Study A0221109

Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were evaluated for examination of vital signs. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Week 12

,,
Interventionmillimeter of mercury (Mean)
Systolic blood pressureDiastolic blood pressure
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule2.1-0.9
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule5.06.3
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet6.010.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Vital Sign (Blood Pressure) at Week 28: Study A0221109

Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were evaluated for examination of vital signs. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Week 28

,,
Interventionmillimeter of mercury (Mean)
Systolic blood pressureDiastolic blood pressure
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule5.75.3
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule9.710.7
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet8.512.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Presence of Involuntary Detrusor Contraction (IDC) at Baseline and Week 12 of Study A0221047 and at Week 28 and Final Visit of Study A0221109

Participants with presence of IDC was summarized for each cohort, each treatment group and total of treatment groups, using the merged data of studies A0221047 and A0221109 as planned. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: Study A0221047: Baseline, Week 12; Study A0221109: Week 28, Final Visit (Week 28 for participants who completed the study or in case of early withdrawal the last assessment before Week 28 was considered to be the final visit)

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BaselineWeek 12Week 28Final Visit
Cohort 11000
Cohort 210788
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule7455
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule3333
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet1000
Total of Treatment Groups11788

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): Merged Data of Studies A0221047 and A0221109

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational product without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; medically important events. A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events. TEAEs were summarized for each cohort (Cohort 1 and Cohort 2, irrespective of treatment received), each treatment group and the total of treatment groups, using the merged data of studies A0221047 and A0221109 as planned. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: Up to a maximum of 56 weeks (24 weeks of treatment in A0221047 and 32 weeks [28 weeks treatment + 4 weeks follow up post last dose] in A0221109)

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants with AEsParticipants with SAEs
Cohort 120
Cohort 291
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule61
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule30
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet20
Total of Treatment Groups111

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (25 Pegs Group) at Week 12- Number of Pegs Dropped: Study A0221109

The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. Participants were asked to insert 25 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit up to 300 seconds. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. Number of pegs dropped while putting in the holes were measured. Participants were assigned to either a 10 or 25-peg assessment based on their age. 25-peg assessment was done on participants of age 9 years and above. In this outcome measure data for dominant and non-dominant hand have been reported separately. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionpegs (Mean)
Dominant hand: BaselineDominant hand: Change at Week 12Non-dominant hand: BaselineNon-dominant hand: Change at Week 12
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule0.5-0.50.5-0.5
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet0.00.00.00.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (25 Pegs Group) at Final Visit- Number of Pegs Dropped: Study A0221109

The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. Participants were asked to insert 25 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit up to 300 seconds. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. Number of pegs dropped while putting in the holes were measured. Participants were assigned to either a 10- or 25-peg assessment based on their age. 25-peg assessment was done on participants of age 9 years and above. In this outcome measure data for dominant and non-dominant hand have been reported separately. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Final visit (Week 28 for participants who completed the study or in case of early withdrawal the last assessment before Week 28 was considered to be the final visit)

,
Interventionpegs (Mean)
Dominant handNon-dominant hand
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule0.0-0.5
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet0.00.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (25 Pegs Group) at Final Visit- Number of Pegs Placed Correctly: Study A0221109

The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. Participants were asked to insert 25 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit up to 300 seconds. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. Number of pegs placed correctly in hole was measured. Participants were assigned to either a 10 or 25-peg assessment based on their age. 25-peg assessment was done on participants of age 9 years and above. In this outcome measure data for dominant and non-dominant hand have been reported separately. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Final visit (Week 28 for participants who completed the study or in case of early withdrawal the last assessment before Week 28 was considered to be the final visit)

,
Interventionpegs (Mean)
Dominant handNon-dominant hand
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule0.00.0
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet0.00.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (25 Pegs Group) at Week 12- Time to Completion: Study A0221109

The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. Participants were asked to insert 25 grooved pegs into holes within the given time limit up to 300 seconds. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. Time taken to complete the test was inversely correlated to the cognitive ability. Participants were assigned to either a 10 or 25-peg assessment based on their age. 25-peg assessment was done on participants of age 9 years and above. In this outcome measure data for dominant and non-dominant hand have been reported separately. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionseconds (Mean)
Dominant hand: BaselineDominant hand: Change at Week 12Non-dominant hand: BaselineNon-dominant hand: Change at Week 12
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule107.5-11.5145.5-2.0
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet59.50.060.5-0.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (25 Pegs Group) at Week 28- Number of Pegs Dropped: Study A0221109

The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. Participants were asked to insert 25 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit up to 300 seconds. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. Number of pegs dropped while putting in the holes were measured. Participants were assigned to either a 10 or 25-peg assessment based on their age. 25-peg assessment was done on participants of age 9 years and above. In this outcome measure data for dominant and non-dominant hand have been reported separately. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Week 28

,
Interventionpegs (Mean)
Dominant handNon-dominant hand
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule0.0-0.5
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet0.00.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (25 Pegs Group) at Week 28- Number of Pegs Placed Correctly: Study A0221109

The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. Participants were asked to insert 25 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit (up to 300 seconds). The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. Number of pegs placed correctly in hole was measured. Participants were assigned to either a 10 or 25-peg assessment based on their age. 25-peg assessment was done on participants of age 9 years and above. In this outcome measure data for dominant and non-dominant hand have been reported separately. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Week 28

,
Interventionpegs (Mean)
Dominant handNon-dominant hand
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule0.00.0
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet0.00.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (25 Pegs Group) at Week 28- Time to Completion: Study A0221109

The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. Participants were asked to insert 25 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit (up to 300 seconds). The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. Time taken to complete the test was inversely correlated to the cognitive ability. Participants were assigned to either a 10 or 25-peg assessment based on their age. 25-peg assessment was done on participants of age 9 years and above. In this outcome measure data for dominant and non-dominant hand have been reported separately. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Week 28

,
Interventionseconds (Mean)
Dominant handNon-dominant hand
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule-14.0-35.0
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet2.0-1.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Maximum Cystometric Bladder Capacity at Week 12 of Study A0221047 and at Week 28 and Final Visit of Study A0221109

Maximum cystometric bladder capacity was defined as maximal tolerable cystometric capacity, until voiding or leaking begins or at a pressure of >=40 centimeter (cm) water (H2O). Maximum cystometric bladder capacity was summarized for each cohort, each treatment group and total of treatment groups, using the merged data of studies A0221047 and A0221109 as planned. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: Study A0221047: Baseline, Week 12; Study A0221109: Week 28, Final Visit (Week 28 for participants who completed the study or in case of early withdrawal the last assessment before Week 28 was considered to be the final visit)

,,,,,
Interventionmilliliter (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 12Change at Week 28Change at Final Visit
Cohort 1181.0153.0121.5121.5
Cohort 2135.542.937.937.9
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule149.737.632.832.8
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule102.355.348.048.0
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet181.0153.0121.5121.5
Total of Treatment Groups143.161.353.153.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Catheterizations Per 24 Hours at Week 12 of Study A0221047 and at Week 28 and Final Visit of Study A0221109

The mean number of catheterizations per 24 hours were calculated as the total number of catheterizations divided by the total number of diary days collected at the assessment time point. Number of diary days collected at the assessment time point = number of calendar days when the diary was completed, even if it was not a full 24 hour period. This outcome measure was only calculated for participants with >0 catheterizations at Baseline. Data was summarized for each cohort, each treatment group and total of treatment groups, using the merged data of studies A0221047 and A0221109 as planned. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: Study A0221047: Baseline, Week 12; Study A0221109: Week 28, Final Visit (Week 28 for participants who completed the study or in case of early withdrawal the last assessment before Week 28 was considered to be the final visit)

,,,,,
Interventioncatheterizations per 24 hours (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 12Change at Week 28Change at Final Visit
Cohort 15.330.000.330.33
Cohort 24.470.05-0.09-0.12
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule4.240.03-0.19-0.21
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule5.000.110.110.11
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet5.330.000.330.33
Total of Treatment Groups4.610.04-0.02-0.04

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12 of Study A0221047 and at Week 28 and Final Visit of Study A0221109

The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours were calculated as the total number of incontinence episodes divided by the total number of diary days collected at the assessment time point. Number of diary days collected at the assessment time point = number of calendar days when the diary was completed, even if it was not a full 24 hour period. This outcome measure was only calculated for participants with >0 incontinence episodes at Baseline. Data was summarized for each cohort, each treatment group and total of treatment groups, using the merged data of studies A0221047 and A0221109 as planned. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: Study A0221047: Baseline, Week 12; Study A0221109: Week 28, Final Visit (Week 28 for participants who completed the study or in case of early withdrawal the last assessment before Week 28 was considered to be the final visit)

,,,,,
Interventionincontinence episodes per 24 hours (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 12Change at Week 28Change at Final Visit
Cohort 11.170.501.831.83
Cohort 23.60-0.18-0.310.08
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule3.48-0.26-0.420.17
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule3.890.00-0.11-0.11
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet1.170.501.831.83
Total of Treatment Groups3.19-0.070.080.38

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (25 Pegs Group) at Final Visit- Time to Completion: Study A0221109

The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. Participants were asked to insert 25 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit up to 300 seconds. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. Time taken to complete the test was inversely correlated to the cognitive ability. Participants were assigned to either a 10 or 25-peg assessment based on their age. 25-peg assessment was done on participants of age 9 years and above. In this outcome measure data for dominant and non-dominant hand have been reported separately. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Final visit (Week 28 for participants who completed the study or in case of early withdrawal the last assessment before Week 28 was considered to be the final visit)

,
Interventionseconds (Mean)
Dominant handNon-dominant hand
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule-14.0-35.0
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet2.08-1.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 12 of Study A0221047 and at Week 28 and Final Visit of Study A0221109

The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours were calculated as the total number of micturitions divided by the total number of diary days collected at the assessment time point. Number of diary days collected at the assessment time point = number of calendar days when the diary was completed on, even if it was not a full 24 hour period. This outcome measure was only calculated for participants with >0 micturitions at Baseline. Data was summarized for each cohort, each treatment group and total of treatment groups, using the merged data of studies A0221047 and A0221109 as planned. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: Study A0221047: Baseline, Week 12; Study A0221109: Week 28, Final Visit (Week 28 for participants who completed the study or in case of early withdrawal the last assessment before Week 28 was considered to be the final visit)

,,
Interventionmicturitions per 24 hours (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 12Change at Week 28Change at Final Visit
Cohort 24.58-1.50-1.08-1.08
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule4.58-1.50-1.08-1.08
Total of Treatment Groups4.58-1.50-1.08-1.08

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Grooved Pegboard Test (25 Pegs Group) at Week 12- Number of Pegs Placed Correctly: Study A0221109

The grooved pegboard test was a manipulative dexterity test that assessed psychomotor speed, fine motor control, and rapid-visual motor coordination. Participants were asked to insert 25 grooved pegs into the holes within the given time limit up to 300 seconds. The task needs to be completed once for each hand; firstly, using the dominant hand followed by the non-dominant hand. Number of pegs placed correctly in hole was measured. Participants were assigned to either a 10 or 25-peg assessment based on their age. 25-peg assessment was done on participants of age 9 years and above. In this outcome measure data for dominant and non-dominant hand have been reported separately. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionpegs (Mean)
Dominant hand: BaselineDominant hand: Change at Week 12Non-dominant hand: BaselineNon-dominant hand: Change at Week 12
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule25.00.025.00.0
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet25.00.025.00.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 12 of Study A0221047 and at Week 28 and Final Visit of Study A0221109

The mean number of urgency episodes per 24 hours were calculated as the total number of urgency episodes divided by the total number of diary days collected at the assessment time point. Number of diary days collected at the assessment time point = number of calendar days when the diary was completed, even if it was not a full 24 hour period. Urgency episodes were defined as urgency marked as 'yes' in the diary. This outcome measure was only calculated for sensate participants with >0 urgency episodes at Baseline. Data was summarized for each cohort, each treatment group and total of treatment groups, using the merged data of studies A0221047 and A0221109 as planned. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: Study A0221047: Baseline, Week 12; Study A0221109: Week 28, Final Visit (Week 28 for participants who completed the study or in case of early withdrawal the last assessment before Week 28 was considered to be the final visit)

,,,
Interventionurgency episodes per 24 hours (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 12Change at Week 28Change at Final Visit
Cohort 20.61-0.61-0.61-0.61
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule0.75-0.75-0.75-0.75
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule0.33-0.33-0.33-0.33
Total of Treatment Groups0.61-0.61-0.61-0.61

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Volume Voided Per Catheterization at Week 12 of Study A0221047 and at Week 28 and Final Visit of Study A0221109

The mean volume per catheterization was calculated as sum of voided volume divided by the total number of catheterization, with a recorded voided volume >0. This outcome measure included only participants who actually had the records of volume voided per catherization. Data was summarized for each cohort, each treatment group and total of treatment groups, using the merged data of studies A0221047 and A0221109 as planned. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: Study A0221047: Baseline, Week 12; Study A0221109: Week 28, Final Visit (Week 28 for participants who completed the study or in case of early withdrawal the last assessment before Week 28 was considered to be the final visit)

,,,,,
Interventionmilliliter per catheterization (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 12Change at Week 28Change at Final Visit
Cohort 1198.75-0.92-29.42-29.42
Cohort 258.3120.6611.5811.58
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule48.7617.908.728.72
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule80.5827.0817.2817.28
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet198.75-0.92-29.42-29.42
Total of Treatment Groups81.7217.064.124.12

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition at Week 12 of Study A0221047 and at Week 28 and Final Visit of Study A0221109

The mean voided volume per micturition was calculated as sum of voided volume divided by the total number of micturition episodes with a recorded voided volume >0. This outcome measure included only participants who actually had the records of volume voided per micturition. Data was summarized for each cohort, each treatment group and total of treatment groups, using the merged data of studies A0221047 and A0221109 as planned. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: Study A0221047: Baseline, Week 12; Study A0221109: Week 28, Final Visit (Week 28 for participants who completed the study or in case of early withdrawal the last assessment before Week 28 was considered to be the final visit)

,,
Interventionmilliliter per micturition (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 12Change at Week 28Change at Final Visit
Cohort 273.4215.774.754.75
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule73.4215.774.754.75
Total of Treatment Groups73.4215.774.754.75

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition or Catheterization at Week 12 of Study A0221047 and at Week 28 and Final Visit of Study A0221109

The mean voided volume per micturition or catheterization was calculated as sum of voided volume divided by the total number of micturition or catheterization episodes with a recorded voided volume >0. Data was summarized for each cohort, each treatment group and total of treatment groups, using the merged data of studies A0221047 and A0221109 as planned. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: Study A0221047: Baseline, Week 12; Study A0221109: Week 28, Final Visit (Week 28 for participants who completed the study or in case of early withdrawal the last assessment before Week 28 was considered to be the final visit)

,,,,,
InterventionmL per micturition or catheterization (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 12Change at Week 28Change at Final Visit
Cohort 1198.75-0.92-29.42-29.42
Cohort 265.6817.8812.3412.34
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule59.2913.949.869.86
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule80.5827.0817.2817.28
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet198.75-0.92-29.42-29.42
Total of Treatment Groups87.8614.754.754.75

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Visual Accommodation at Final Visit: Study A0221109

The visual accommodation was the minimum focusing distance for each eye at which vision became blurred - the mean of triplicate measurements. The participants focused on a single letter of the 20/40 line of an eye chart and chart was moved slowly towards the participant until letter was blurred. At this point, the distance from eye to letter was measured for each eye. In this outcome measure data have been reported for right and left eye separately. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for each treatment group of study A0221109 only. (NCT02501928)
Timeframe: A0221109: Baseline, Final visit (Week 28 for participants who completed the study or in case of early withdrawal the last assessment before Week 28 was considered to be the final visit)

,,
Interventioncentimeter (Mean)
Right EyeLeft Eye
Fesoterodine 2 mg Capsule4.382.86
Fesoterodine 4 mg Capsule-0.110.50
Fesoterodine 8 mg Tablet5.173.17

[back to top]

Measure of Physical Activity

Physical activity was measured by using accelerometer worn over the course of a week at follow up. Average daily step counts were derived from this weeklong measurement. (NCT03946124)
Timeframe: 1 week

Interventionsteps per day (Median)
Fesoterodine1634.19

[back to top]

Inflammatory Markers in Urine Will be Measured Using Immunoenzyme Assays to Measure the Interaction of Anticholinergic Treatment and the Inflammatory Milieu.

Statistical testing was used to determine if there was a difference in inflammatory markers in the urine of patients between baseline visit and 6 week visit. 7 markers were chosen and compared, all inflammatory markers present in urine. (NCT04090190)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Baseline CRPFollow-up CRPBaseline IL-12/IL-23p40Follow-up IL-12/IL-23p40Baseline MCP-1Follow-up MCP-1Baseline GM-CSFFollow-up GM CSFBaseline IL-1BFollow-up IL-1BBaseline IL-6Follow-up IL-6Baseline IL-8Follow-up IL-8
Standard of Care Anticholinergic Treatment2.1922.5652.1922.56575.4965.020.1020.2030.2030.4150.6670.9677.2116.116

[back to top]

The Effectiveness of Anticholinergic Treatment in Relation to the Urinary Microbiome. Culture to Standard Culture Media Will Pickup Aerobic Bacteria and Yeasts After DNA Extraction and End Point PCR for 16S rDNA Genes.

The change in g_lactobacillus from Baseline to Follow-up (6 weeks), which corresponds to before and after anticholinergic treatment. (NCT04090190)
Timeframe: At the 6 week mark

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Standard of Care Anticholinergic Treatment0.001131599

[back to top]