Page last updated: 2024-11-06

paroxetine

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressant. It was first synthesized in the 1980s by a team of scientists at SmithKline Beecham (now GlaxoSmithKline). Paroxetine is thought to work by increasing the levels of serotonin in the brain, a neurotransmitter that plays a role in mood regulation. It is used to treat major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, and premenstrual dysphoric disorder. Paroxetine has been studied extensively for its efficacy and safety in treating these conditions. It is generally well-tolerated, but common side effects include nausea, headache, and sexual dysfunction. Paroxetine is a widely prescribed medication, and it has been a subject of much research to understand its mechanisms of action, efficacy, and safety. The development of paroxetine has had a significant impact on the treatment of mental health disorders, providing a valuable therapeutic option for many patients.'

Paroxetine: A serotonin uptake inhibitor that is effective in the treatment of depression. [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

paroxetine : A benzodioxole that consists of piperidine bearing 1,3-benzodioxol-5-yloxy)methyl and 4-fluorophenyl substituents at positions 3 and 4 respectively; the (3S,4R)-diastereomer. Highly potent and selective 5-HT uptake inhibitor that binds with high affinity to the serotonin transporter (Ki = 0.05 nM). Ki values are 1.1, 350 and 1100 nM for inhibition of [3H]-5-HT, [3H]-l-NA and [3H]-DA uptake respectively. Displays minimal affinity for alpha1-, alpha2- or beta-adrenoceptors, 5-HT2A, 5-HT1A, D2 or H1 receptors at concentrations below 1000 nM, however displays weak affinity for muscarinic ACh receptors (Ki = 42 nM). Antidepressant and anxiolytic in vivo. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID43815
CHEMBL ID490
CHEBI ID7936
SCHEMBL ID27799
MeSH IDM0026386

Synonyms (131)

Synonym
BIDD:GT0673
AB00053704-21
BRD-K37991163-003-02-7
arotin
daparox
(-)3s,4r-paroxetine
besitram
parogen
arketis
xetanor
DIVK1C_006884
nnc-20-7051
brl-29060
fg-7051
(3s,4r)-3-[(2h-1,3-benzodioxol-5-yloxy)methyl]-4-(4-fluorophenyl)piperidine
chembl490 ,
bdbm22416
(3s,4r)-3-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yloxymethyl)-4-(4-fluorophenyl)piperidine
(3s,4r)-3-[(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yloxy)methyl]-4-(4-fluorophenyl)piperidine
paroxetina
CHEBI:7936 ,
paroxetinum
(3s-trans)-3-((1,3-benzodioxol-5-yloxy)methyl)-4-(4-fluorophenyl)piperidine
SPECTRUM_001752
PRESTWICK3_000851
BPBIO1_000949
BSPBIO_000861
SPECTRUM5_001665
paxpar
(-)-(3s,4r)-4-(p-fluorophenyl)-3-((3,4-methylenedioxy)phenoxy)methyl)piperidine
casbol
paroxetina [inn-spanish]
motivan
paroxetinum [inn-latin]
paroxetine [usan:inn:ban]
hsdb 7175
piperidine, 3-((1,3-benzodioxol-5-yloxy)methyl)-4-(4-fluorophenyl)-, (3s,4r)-
paxetil
piperidine, 3-((1,3-benzodioxol-5-yloxy)methyl)-4-(4-fluorophenyl)-, (3s-trans)-
frosinor
(-)-trans-4-(4-fluorophenyl)-3-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenoxymethyl)piperidine
brl 29060
(-)-trans-4-(p-fluorophenyl)-3-[[3,4-(methylenedioxy)phenoxy]methyl]-piperidine
paxil cr
piperidine, 3-[(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yloxy)methyl]-4-(4-fluorophenyl)-, (3s,4r)-
piperidine, 3-[(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yloxy)methyl]-4-(4-fluorophenyl)-, (3s-trans)-
(-)-paroxetine
fg 7051
(3s-trans)-3-[(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl-oxy)methyl]-4-(4-fluorophenyl)piperidine
(-)-(3s,4r)-4-(p-fluorophenyl)-3-((3,4-(methylenedioxy)phenoxy)methyl)piperidine
AB00514724
paroxetine
61869-08-7
C07415
NCGC00025355-03
DB00715
paroxetine (tn)
D02362
paroxetine (usp/inn)
NCGC00025355-02
KBIO1_001828
KBIOSS_002232
KBIO2_007368
KBIO2_004800
KBIO2_002232
SPECPLUS_000788
NCGC00025355-07
NCGC00025355-06
NCGC00025355-05
NCGC00025355-04
HMS2090H05
NCGC00025355-08
(3s,4r)-3-((benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yloxy)methyl)-4-(4-fluorophenyl)piperidine
NCGC00182968-01
NCGC00025355-09
bdbm50331515
paroxetine.hcl
tox21_113123
dtxsid3023425 ,
dtxcid703425
cas-61869-08-7
8pr ,
oxetine
unii-41vrh5220h
41vrh5220h ,
paroxetine [mart.]
paroxetine [vandf]
paroxetine [mi]
(3s,4r)-3-((1,3-benzodioxol-5-yloxy)methyl)-4-(4-fluorophenyl)piperidine
(-)-trans-4-(p-fluorophenyl)-3-((3,4-(methylenedioxy)phenoxy)methyl)piperidine
paroxetine [usan]
paroxetine [who-dd]
paroxetine [inn]
AKOS015888636
paroxetine hydrochloride (anhydrous or hemihydrate)
gtpl4790
SCHEMBL27799
NCGC00025355-12
tox21_113123_1
paroxetine hcl hemihydrate
AHOUBRCZNHFOSL-YOEHRIQHSA-N
AB00053704_23
AB00053704_22
AC-8185
3h-paroxetine
SBI-0051908.P002
Q408471
paroxetine hydrochloride anhydrous ep impurity e
BRD-K37991163-050-05-1
paroxetine, (+/-)-
paroxetine, trans-(+/-)-
piperidine, 3-((1,3-benzodioxol-5-yloxy)methyl)-4-(4-fluorophenyl)-, trans-
piperidine, 3-((1,3-benzodioxol-5-yloxy)methyl)-4-(4-fluorophenyl)-, (3r,4s)-rel-
unii-32q7tw8bx7
piperidine, 3-((1,3-benzodioxol-5-yloxy)methyl)-4-(4-fluorophenyl)-, trans-(+/-)-
(+/-)-paroxetine
130855-15-1
32q7tw8bx7 ,
rel-(3r,4s)-3-((1,3-benzodioxol-5-yloxy)methyl)-4-(4-fluorophenyl)piperidine
SDCCGSBI-0051908.P003
piperidine, 3-[(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yloxy)methyl]-4-(4-fluorophenyl)-,(3s,4r)-
NCGC00025355-22
CS-0083299
HY-122272
EN300-150199
(3s,4r)-3-[(1,3-dioxaindan-5-yloxy)methyl]-4-(4-fluorophenyl)piperidine
paroxetinum (inn-latin)
n06ab05
paroxetine (mart.)
paroxetinum (latin)
paroxetina (inn-spanish)

Research Excerpts

Overview

Paroxetine (PX) is a widely used antidepressant with side effects such as weakness, dizziness, and trouble sleeping. It is an effective and well-tolerated alternative treatment for moderate-to-severe erythema of rosacea.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Paroxetine is a common pharmaceutical to treat depression and has been found to pose threats to aquatic organisms. "( The Effects of Paroxetine on Benthic Microbial Food Web and Nitrogen Transformation in River Sediments.
Chen, X; Li, Y; Niu, L; Shang, J; Wang, L; Wang, X; Zhang, H; Zhang, W, 2022
)
2.52
"Paroxetine (PX) is a widely used antidepressant with side effects such as weakness, dizziness, and trouble sleeping. "( Antidepressant and Neuroprotective Effects of 3-Hydroxy Paroxetine, an Analog of Paroxetine in Rats.
Carrasco-Carballo, A; Chamorro-Arenas, D; Hernández-Arrambide, PE; Luna, F; Martínez, I; Mendieta, L; Parra, I; Sartillo-Piscil, F; Tizabi, Y, 2023
)
2.6
"Paroxetine is an effective and well-tolerated alternative treatment for moderate-to-severe erythema of rosacea."( Paroxetine is an effective treatment for refractory erythema of rosacea: Primary results from the Prospective Rosacea Refractory Erythema Randomized Clinical Trial.
Gao, Q; Huang, Y; Jian, D; Li, J; Li, L; Liu, F; Shi, W; Tang, Y; Wang, B; Wang, P; Xie, H; Yang, J; Zhao, Z, 2023
)
3.8
"Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP)2D6. "( Impact of CYP2D6 Genotype on Paroxetine Serum Concentration.
Haslemo, T; Hole, K; Molden, E, 2023
)
2.64
"Paroxetine (PRX) is a common antidepressant drug which widely existence in natural environment. "( Paroxetine induced larva zebrafish cardiotoxicity through inflammation response.
Gu, J; Ji, G; Song, F; Wu, L; Wu, W; Zhu, Y, 2023
)
3.8
"Paroxetine (PAR) is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressant increasingly detected in surface waters worldwide. "( Are early and young life stages of fish affected by paroxetine? A case study with Danio rerio.
Ferreira, CSS; Kille, P; Oliveira, M; Venâncio, C, 2023
)
2.6
"Paroxetine (PRXT) serves as a selective GRK2 inhibitor which is widely used to treat anxiety and depression for several decades."( Paroxetine protects against bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis by blocking GRK2/Smad3 pathway.
Chen, G; Huang, J; Nie, H; Tang, Z; Zhao, K, 2023
)
3.07
"Paroxetine is an effective drug for the treatment of depression and stress which has been commonly used in recent years. "( Polyoxometalate/reduced graphene oxide modified pencil graphite sensor for the electrochemical trace determination of paroxetine in biological and pharmaceutical media.
Oghli, AH; Soleymanpour, A, 2020
)
2.21
"Paroxetine is a potent inhibitor of serotonin reuptake and is widely prescribed for the treatment of depression and other neurological disorders. "( Recent Advances in the Synthesis of the Antidepressant Paroxetine.
Domingues, HS; Patrício, P; Proença, MF; Rodrigues, AJ; Santos, J, 2021
)
2.31
"Paroxetine is a valid choice in the comprehensive treatment of COPD."( Comprehensive patterns of comorbidity: copd and depression. Aspects of treatment.
Burya, LV; Kapustianskaya, AA; Kolenko, IA; Moisieieva, NV; Rumyantseva, MA; Shumeiko, OH,
)
0.85
"Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) with several indications, one of which is for depression. "( A Case Report of Serotonin Syndrome in a Patient on Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) Monotherapy.
Blake, CS; Hudd, TR; Nguyen, TT; Rimola-Dejesus, Y; Zaiken, K, 2020
)
2
"Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor used for the treatment of depression; this study investigated its other mechanisms by studying the expression and therefore involvement of norepinephrine transporter (NET) and serotonin transporter (5-HTT). "( Antidepressive effect of paroxetine in a rat model: upregulating expression of serotonin and norepinephrine transporter.
Li, N; Liu, D; Qin, LJ; Qiu, HM; Wang, LJ; Wu, XH; Yang, JX; Zhou, QX, 2013
)
2.14
"Paroxetine is a potent selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor used for the treatment of depression and related mood disorders. "( Determination of paroxetine in blood and urine using micellar liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection.
Agrawal, N; Bose, D; Carda-Broch, S; Durgbanshi, A; Esteve-Romero, J; Marco-Peiró, S; Peris-Vicente, J,
)
1.91
"Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, and is thought to help decrease VMS by regulating body temperature via neurotransmitters."( Paroxetine: a first for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors - a new use: approved for vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women.
Thacker, HL; Weber, L, 2014
)
2.57
"Paroxetine is a second-generation antidepressant and a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6, the same isoenzyme involved in the metabolism of nebivolol."( A pharmacokinetic drug interaction study between nebivolol and paroxetine in healthy volunteers.
Achim, M; Bocsan, C; Briciu, C; Buzoianu, A; Gheldiu, AM; Muntean, D; Neag, M; Popa, A; Vlase, L, 2014
)
1.36
"Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) that is currently available on the market and is suspected of causing congenital malformations in babies born to mothers who take the drug during the first trimester of pregnancy. "( Low-dose paroxetine exposure causes lifetime declines in male mouse body weight, reproduction and competitive ability as measured by the novel organismal performance assay.
Galland, T; Gaukler, SM; Kandaris, KA; Liu, NM; Morrison, LC; Potts, WK; Ruff, JS; Underwood, TK; Yost, GS; Young, EL,
)
1.99
"Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) that is clinically used for the treatment of depression in human patients. "( Paroxetine differentially modulates LPS-induced TNFα and IL-6 production in mouse macrophages.
Durairaj, H; Parameswaran, N; Steury, MD, 2015
)
3.3
"Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor commonly prescribed for the treatment of depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder. "( Paroxetine in Postmortem Fluids and Tissues from Nine Aviation Accident Victims.
Johnson, RD; Kemp, PM; Lewis, RJ, 2015
)
3.3
"Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and is used for the treatment of depression and anxiety problems, but suffers from the drawback of poor oral bioavailability (less than 50%) due to its extensive first pass metabolism. "( Intranasal delivery of paroxetine nanoemulsion via the olfactory region for the management of depression: formulation, behavioural and biochemical estimation.
Ali, J; Baboota, S; Gupta, BK; Kumar, S; Pandey, YR, 2016
)
2.19
"Paroxetine is a selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI) available in immediate release and controlled release (CR) formulations. "( Paroxetine: safety and tolerability issues.
Ham, BJ; Han, C; Marks, DM; Masand, PS; Pae, CU; Park, MH; Patkar, AA, 2008
)
3.23
"Paroxetine seems to be an effective, well-tolerated treatment for cholestatic pruritus due to gastrointestinal malignancy."( [Paroxetine treatment of 3 cases of cholestatic pruritus due to gastrointestinal malignancy].
Nonaka, E; Suzuki, Y; Takita, N; Unotoro, J, 2010
)
1.99
"Paroxetine is a dose-dependent dilator of the pupil and as expected a dose-dependent inhibitor of (+)-tramadol's O-demethylation."( Two separate dose-dependent effects of paroxetine: mydriasis and inhibition of tramadol's O-demethylation via CYP2D6.
Brosen, K; Damkier, P; Nielsen, AG; Noehr-Jensen, L; Pedersen, RS, 2010
)
2.07
"Paroxetine is a drug of choice in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). "( CYP1A2 genetic polymorphisms are associated with treatment response to the antidepressant paroxetine.
Chan, HW; Fang, CK; Hsiao, CF; Hsiao, MC; Hsu, YT; Kuo, HW; Lin, KM; Liu, CY; Liu, SC; Liu, YL; Lu, SC; Shen, WW; Tang, HS; Tian, JN; Tsai, IJ; Tsou, HH; Wu, CS, 2010
)
2.02
"Paroxetine is a widely used antidepressant in clinic. "( Paroxetine up-regulates neurogenesis in hippocampus-derived neural stem cell from fetal rats.
Chen, YC; Fan, J; Peng, ZW; Tan, QR; Wang, HN; Wang, Y; Xue, F; Zhang, LY; Zhang, RG, 2013
)
3.28
"Paroxetine CR is an effective and well-tolerated antidepressant exhibiting symptomatic improvement as early as week 1. "( Efficacy and tolerability of controlled-release and immediate-release paroxetine in the treatment of depression.
Dubé, EM; Golden, RN; McSorley, P; Nemeroff, CB; Pitts, CD, 2002
)
1.99
"Paroxetine is a non-tricyclic serotonin reuptake inhibitor prescribed for the treatment of depression."( [Increased perioperative blood loss during treatment with paroxetine].
Gouma, DJ; Koopman, MM; Levi, MM; Sewnath, ME; van Hillegersberg, R, 2002
)
1.28
"Paroxetine is an effective long-term treatment for social anxiety disorder."( Efficacy of paroxetine for relapse prevention in social anxiety disorder: a 24-week study.
Hair, T; Kumar, R; Stein, DJ; Versiani, M, 2002
)
2.14
"Paroxetine is a potent selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) with indications for the treatment of depression, obsessive- compulsive disorder, panic disorder and social phobia. "( Use of paroxetine for the treatment of depression and anxiety disorders in the elderly: a review.
Bourin, M, 2003
)
2.22
"Paroxetine is an extensively used SSRI that has been shown to impair erectile function in patients, to induce erectile dysfunction and to inhibit nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity and NO production in animal models."( Vardenafil reverses erectile dysfunction induced by paroxetine in rats.
Angulo, J; Bischoff, E; Cuevas, P; Gabancho, S; Sáenz de Tejada, I, 2003
)
1.29
"Paroxetine is a well-known antidepressant, used worldwide in therapeutics. "( Synthesis of the major metabolites of paroxetine.
de la Torre, R; Joglar, J; Roura, L; Segura, M, 2003
)
2.03
"Paroxetine is a first-line antidepressant and has been reported to decrease plasma NO(x), theoretically suggesting a potential deleterious effect on the cardiovascular system."( Paroxetine-induced increase in metabolic end products of nitric oxide.
Archer, SL; Baker, GB; Lara, N; Le Mellédo, JM, 2003
)
2.48
"Paroxetine is a selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor that has been found effective in the treatment of major depression as well as a range of anxiety disorders."( Paroxetine in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder: pooled analysis of placebo-controlled studies.
Beebe, K; Davidson, J; Seedat, S; Stein, DJ, 2003
)
2.48
"Paroxetine is a potent and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) with some neuropharmacologic properties unique among this class of compounds. "( Neuropharmacology of paroxetine.
Nemeroff, CB; Owens, MJ, 2003
)
2.08
"Paroxetine is a particularly well-studied psychopharmacologic agent in this regard."( In vivo neuroimaging correlates of the efficacy of paroxetine in the treatment of mood and anxiety disorders.
Kilts, C, 2003
)
1.29
"Paroxetine is a widely studied selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) with evidence for efficacy and safety that is supported by a large body of published literature."( Paroxetine treatment of major depressive disorder.
Keller, MB, 2003
)
2.48
"Paroxetine is a first-line antidepressant and has been reported to decrease plasma NOx, theoretically suggesting a potential deleterious effect on the cardiovascular system."( Paroxetine-induced increase in metabolic end products of nitric oxide.
Archer, SL; Baker, GB; Lara, N; Le Mellédo, JM, 2003
)
2.48
"Paroxetine is a selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor useful in the treatment of a wide range of psychiatric disorders. "( Paroxetine in the treatment of generalised anxiety disorder.
Bellew, K; Rickels, K; Rynn, MA; Snyderman, SH, 2004
)
3.21
"Paroxetine is an effective and generally well-tolerated treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder in children and adolescents."( Paroxetine treatment in children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Carpenter, DJ; Emslie, G; Gardiner, C; Geller, DA; Machin, A; Murphy, T; Perera, P; Wagner, KD; Wetherhold, E, 2004
)
3.21
"Paroxetine is an effective, generally well-tolerated treatment for pediatric social anxiety disorder."( A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of paroxetine in children and adolescents with social anxiety disorder.
Berard, R; Carpenter, DJ; Davy, K; Gee, M; Machin, A; Perera, P; Stein, MB; Wagner, KD; Wetherhold, E, 2004
)
2
"Paroxetine CR is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for panic disorder. "( Efficacy and tolerability of controlled-release paroxetine in the treatment of panic disorder.
Burnham, DB; Iyengar, MK; Perera, P; Sheehan, DV, 2005
)
2.03
"Paroxetine is an example of an selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor agent, which has been well studied in the treatment of panic disorder and is efficacious and well-tolerated."( Paroxetine in panic disorder: clinical management and long-term follow-up.
Dannon, PN; Iancu, I; Kotler, M; Lowengrub, K, 2004
)
2.49
"Paroxetine is a very potent inhibitor of CYP2D6."( Paroxetine, a cytochrome P450 2D6 inhibitor, diminishes the stereoselective O-demethylation and reduces the hypoalgesic effect of tramadol.
Brøsen, K; Enggaard, TP; Laugesen, S; Pedersen, RS; Sindrup, SH, 2005
)
2.49
"Paroxetine is an SSRI approved by the FDA and Health Canada for the treatment of a variety of psychiatric conditions."( An evaluation of paroxetine in generalised social anxiety disorder.
Bennett, M; Mancini, C; Patterson, B; Van Ameringen, M, 2005
)
1.39
"Paroxetine is an effective treatment for hot flashes in women with or without a prior breast cancer."( Paroxetine is an effective treatment for hot flashes: results from a prospective randomized clinical trial.
Bunnell, C; Cullen, J; Gallagher, A; Gehan, E; Greep, N; Hayes, DF; Henry-Tilman, R; Isaacs, C; Osborne, M; Slack, R; Stearns, V; Ullmer, L, 2005
)
3.21
"Paroxetine is a potent selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor with antidepressant and anxiolytic activity that is effective in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), improving the core symptoms of anxiety, worry, and tension. "( Remission of generalized anxiety disorder: a review of the paroxetine clinical trials database.
Duff, D; Iyengar, M; Rickels, K; Rynn, M, 2006
)
2.02
"Paroxetine (Paxil) is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and anxiolytic that is approved to treat numerous mood disorders. "( Rare case of serotonin syndrome with therapeutic doses of paroxetine.
Anandacoomarswamy, D; Godkar, D; Niranjan, S; Paruchuri, P; Sheth, K,
)
1.82
"Paroxetine is believed to be a substrate of CYP2D6. "( Terbinafine increases the plasma concentration of paroxetine after a single oral administration of paroxetine in healthy subjects.
Inoue, Y; Kaneko, S; Niioka, T; Saito, M; Sato, Y; Tsuchimine, S; Yasui-Furukori, N, 2007
)
2.04
"Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) with antidepressant and anxiolytic properties. "( Paroxetine: current status in psychiatry.
Pae, CU; Patkar, AA, 2007
)
3.23
"Paroxetine (Paxil) is a widely prescribed antidepressant of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) class for which multiple cutaneous adverse effects have been reported, including urticaria, ecchymoses, vasculitis, and pruritus. "( Urticarial vasculitis secondary to paroxetine.
Cusack, CA; Ko, C; Welsh, JP,
)
1.85
"Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor which stimulates antidiuretic hormone (ADH) release and may cause the syndrome of inappropriate ADH secretion with consecutive hyponatremia. "( Fatal hyponatremia and other metabolic disturbances associated with psychotropic drug polypharmacy.
Alfirevic, Z; Degoricija, V; Vucicevic, Z; Vukicevic-Badouin, D, 2007
)
1.78
"Paroxetine is a widely used antidepressant that has received attention regarding suicide risk in younger patients."( Paroxetine.
Helmeste, D; Tang, SW, 2008
)
3.23
"Paroxetine is a serotonin re-uptake inhibitor with good selectivity and no significant active metabolites. "( Paroxetine.
Helmeste, D; Tang, SW, 2008
)
3.23
"Paroxetine is an effective antidepressant drug and potent serotonin (5-HT) uptake inhibitor. "( Synthesis and characterization of an aryl-azidoparoxetine. A novel photo-affinity probe for serotonin-transporter.
Bakish, D; Chudzik, J; Hrdina, PD; McCarthy, D; Ravindran, A, 1995
)
1.99
"Paroxetine is a phenylpiperidine compound which is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). "( Multicenter double blind study of paroxetine and amitriptyline in elderly depressed inpatients.
Fartacek, R; Geretsegger, C; Heim, M; Mair, M; Platz, T; Stuppaeck, CH, 1995
)
2.01
"[3H]Paroxetine is a more reliable ligand for studying the serotonin (5-HT) transporter complex than [3H]imipramine. "( Binding of [3H]paroxetine to platelets of depressed patients: seasonal differences and effects of diagnostic classification.
Cosyns, P; D'Hondt, P; Gommeren, W; Leysen, JE; Maes, M; Scharpé, S, 1994
)
1.2
"Paroxetine is a trans-isomeric phenylpiperidine with antidepressant properties induced by selective inhibition of the neuronal high affinity uptake of serotonin. "( [Paroxetine: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics].
Hiemke, C, 1994
)
2.64
"Paroxetine is a novel phenylpiperidine compound that is a potent and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. "( Paroxetine: an overview of the efficacy and safety of a new selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor in the treatment of depression.
Nemeroff, CB, 1993
)
3.17
"Paroxetine is a novel phenylpiperidine antidepressant agent that acts as a potent and selective inhibitor of serotonin reuptake. "( A double-blind, randomized, fluoxetine-controlled, multicenter study of paroxetine in the treatment of depression.
Tignol, J, 1993
)
1.96
"Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) recently approved for the treatment of major depression. "( Paroxetine: a selective serotonin reuptake inhibiting antidepressant.
Caley, CF; Weber, SS, 1993
)
3.17
"Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor effective in a once-daily administration regimen in the treatment of depression. "( Paroxetine. A review of its pharmacology, therapeutic use in depression and therapeutic potential in diabetic neuropathy.
Holliday, SM; Plosker, GL,
)
3.02
"Paroxetine is a selective and potent inhibitor of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) uptake into serotonergic neurones. "( [3H]paroxetine binding in rat frontal cortex strongly correlates with [3H]5-HT uptake: effect of administration of various antidepressant treatments.
Buckett, WR; Cheetham, SC; Heal, DJ; Slater, NA; Viggers, JA, 1993
)
2.29
"Paroxetine is a new compound in the group of the selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors. "( Double-blind multicenter study of paroxetine and amitriptyline in depressed inpatients.
Berzewski, H; Eckmann, F; Gonzalves, N; Kissling, W; Knorr, W; Magyar, I; Möller, HJ; Ressler, P; Rudolf, GA; Steinmeyer, EM, 1993
)
2.01
"Paroxetine is an antidepressant of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) class. "( Adverse events after the abrupt discontinuation of paroxetine.
Dominguez, RA; Goodnick, PJ,
)
1.83
"Paroxetine is a potent inhibitor of serotonin re-uptake. "( Paroxetine in the treatment of Chinese patients with depressive episode: a double-blind randomized comparison with imipramine.
Chan, CH; Chiu, HJ; Hong, CJ, 1996
)
3.18
"Paroxetine is a selective serotonergic reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)."( Paroxetine and galactorrhea.
Bizouard, P; Bonin, B; Sechter, D; Vandel, P, 1997
)
2.46
"Paroxetine is a selective and potent serotonin reuptake inhibitor and its efficacy for the treatment of depression has been proven. "( Analysis of sleep EEG microstructure in subchronic paroxetine treatment of healthy subjects.
Benkert, O; Kögel, P; Mann, K; Röschke, J; Rossbach, W; Schlösser, R; Wagner, P, 1997
)
1.99
"Paroxetine is a frequently used antidepressant and a potent inhibitor of the CYP2D6 isozyme in vitro (inhibition constant [Ki] = 0.15 micromol/L). "( Paroxetine potentiates the central nervous system side effects of perphenazine: contribution of cytochrome P4502D6 inhibition in vivo.
Herrmann, N; Kalow, W; Naranjo, CA; Ozdemir, V; Reed, K; Sellers, EM, 1997
)
3.18
"Paroxetine is an effective and well-tolerated short-term treatment of panic disorder. "( Double-blind, fixed-dose, placebo-controlled study of paroxetine in the treatment of panic disorder.
Ballenger, JC; Bushnell, W; Gergel, IP; Steiner, M; Wheadon, DE, 1998
)
1.99
"Paroxetine is a potent and selective inhibitor of the neuronal reuptake of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT), which was previously reviewed as an antidepressant in Drugs in 1991. "( Paroxetine. An update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in depression and a review of its use in other disorders.
Benfield, P; Gunasekara, NS; Noble, S, 1998
)
3.19
"Paroxetine is an effective treatment for patients with generalized social phobia. "( Paroxetine treatment of generalized social phobia (social anxiety disorder): a randomized controlled trial.
Bushnell, W; Gergel, I; Liebowitz, MR; Lydiard, RB; Pitts, CD; Stein, MB, 1998
)
3.19
"Paroxetine (Paxil) is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, one of a new class of antidepressants used in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder, and depression. "( Distribution of paroxetine in three postmortem cases.
Vermeulen, T, 1998
)
2.09
"Paroxetine is a selective and potent serotonin reuptake inhibitor with reported antidepressant properties. "( Conventional and spectral power analysis of all-night sleep EEG after subchronic treatment with paroxetine in healthy male volunteers.
Benkert, O; Röschke, J; Rossbach, W; Schlösser, R, 1998
)
1.96
"Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy in treating obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in adults. "( Paroxetine open-label treatment of pediatric outpatients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Carroll, E; Fitzgerald, KD; Rosenberg, DR; Stewart, CM; Tawile, V, 1999
)
3.19
"Paroxetine is an effective, well-tolerated treatment for patients with social phobia."( Paroxetine in social phobia/social anxiety disorder. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Paroxetine Study Group.
Baldwin, D; Bobes, J; Faure, M; Scharwächter, I; Stein, DJ, 1999
)
3.19
"Paroxetine hydrochloride is a promising new treatment for hot flashes in breast cancer survivors, and warrants further evaluation in a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial."( A pilot trial assessing the efficacy of paroxetine hydrochloride (Paxil) in controlling hot flashes in breast cancer survivors.
Crawford, J; Ellis, MJ; Hanfelt, JJ; Hayes, DF; Isaacs, C; Kramer, R; Lawrence, W; Rowland, J; Stearns, V, 2000
)
2.02
"Paroxetine is a potent selective inhibitor of serotonin reuptake."( A depressed myocardium.
MacIver, DH; Partridge, SJ; Solanki, T, 2000
)
1.03
"Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) with proven efficacy in the treatment of depression, panic disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder. "( Clinical experience with paroxetine in social anxiety disorder.
Baldwin, DS, 2000
)
2.05
"Paroxetine is a safe and effective drug to treat depression in PD."( Tolerability of paroxetine in Parkinson's disease: a prospective study.
Antonini, A; Canesi, M; Mariani, CB; Pezzoli, G; Tesei, S; Zecchinelli, A, 2000
)
1.37
"Paroxetine is a potent and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) with currently approved indications for the treatment of depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder and social phobia. "( Paroxetine: a review.
Bourin, M; Chue, P; Guillon, Y, 2001
)
3.2
"Paroxetine, 20 mg/day, is an effective and safe treatment for patients with generalized social anxiety disorder and significantly improves social anxiety, avoidance of social interactions, social disability, and overall clinical condition. "( A randomized, double-blind, fixed-dose comparison of paroxetine and placebo in the treatment of generalized social anxiety disorder.
Carpenter, D; Liebowitz, MR; Oakes, R; Pitts, CD; Stein, MB; Tancer, M, 2002
)
2.01
"Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), with antidepressant and anxiolytic activity. "( Paroxetine: an update of its use in psychiatric disorders in adults.
Cheer, SM; Goa, KL; Matheson, AJ; Ormrod, D; Wagstaff, AJ, 2002
)
3.2
"Paroxetine is a strong CYP2D6 inhibitor, and these results confirm previous studies showing an involvement of CYP2D6 in methadone metabolism with a stereoselectivity toward the (R)-enantiomer."( Paroxetine increases steady-state concentrations of (R)-methadone in CYP2D6 extensive but not poor metabolizers.
Baumann, P; Begré, S; Cosendai-Savary, L; Eap, CB; Golay, KP; Jaquet-Rochat, S; Kosel, M; Ladewig, D; von Bardeleben, U, 2002
)
2.48
"Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), with antidepressant and anxiolytic activity. "( Spotlight on paroxetine in psychiatric disorders in adults.
Cheer, SM; Goa, KL; Matheson, AJ; Ormrod, D; Wagstaff, AJ, 2002
)
2.13
"Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor possessing anti-depressant activity. "( The role of cytochrome P4502D6 in the metabolism of paroxetine by human liver microsomes.
Bloomer, JC; Haddock, RE; Lennard, MS; Tucker, GT; Woods, FR, 1992
)
1.98
"Paroxetine was found to be an effective antidepressant drug when compared to placebo."( A double-blind comparison of paroxetine and placebo in the treatment of depressed outpatients.
Claghorn, J, 1992
)
1.3
"Paroxetine is a new selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor which has been extensively evaluated as an antidepressant in clinical trials and a large computerized safety database has been accumulated. "( Paroxetine: an overview of dosage, tolerability, and safety.
Jenner, PN, 1992
)
3.17
"Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor that is now licensed in various countries in Europe. "( The advantages of paroxetine in different subgroups of depression.
Montgomery, SA, 1992
)
2.06
"Paroxetine is a potent and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). "( Paroxetine versus placebo: a double-blind comparison in depressed patients.
Claghorn, JL; Dunbar, GC; Kiev, A; Rickels, K; Smith, WT, 1992
)
3.17
"Paroxetine is an investigational antidepressant that acts through selective inhibition of serotonin reuptake at the synapse. "( A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of paroxetine in depressed outpatients.
Kiev, A, 1992
)
1.99
"Paroxetine is a novel phenylpiperidine compound that acts as a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). "( An overview of paroxetine.
Boyer, WF; Feighner, JP, 1992
)
2.08
"Paroxetine is an investigational antidepressant that appears to act by selectively blocking neuronal serotonin uptake."( The safety and efficacy of paroxetine compared with placebo in a double-blind trial of depressed outpatients.
Claghorn, JL, 1992
)
1.3
"Paroxetine is a phenylpiperidine compound that selectively inhibits neuronal serotonin uptake in man. "( A placebo-controlled trial of paroxetine in the treatment of major depression.
Glaudin, V; Smith, WT, 1992
)
2.01
"Paroxetine is a novel antidepressant that selectively inhibits neuronal reuptake of serotonin. "( A 6-week, double-blind trial of paroxetine, imipramine, and placebo in depressed outpatients.
Fabre, LF, 1992
)
2.01
"Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor with significant antidepressant properties. "( Paroxetine in the treatment of depression: a comparison with imipramine and placebo.
Boyer, WF; Feighner, JP, 1992
)
3.17
"Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor which is being developed as an antidepressant. "( Paroxetine in major depression: a double-blind trial with imipramine and placebo.
Cohn, JB; Wilcox, CS, 1992
)
3.17
"Paroxetine is an antidepressant that acts through selective inhibition of serotonin reuptake."( Two combined, multicenter double-blind studies of paroxetine and doxepin in geriatric patients with major depression.
Cohn, CK; Cohn, JB; Dunner, DL; Feighner, JP; Fieve, RR; Halikas, JP; Hartford, JT; Hearst, ED; Settle, EC; Walshe, T, 1992
)
1.26
"Paroxetine is a highly potent and selective inhibitor of serotonin reuptake, being more potent in vitro than fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, and sertraline. "( The pharmacologic profile of paroxetine, a new selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.
Johnson, AM; Tulloch, IF, 1992
)
2.02
"Paroxetine is a potent inhibitor of sparteine oxidation by CYP2D6 in vivo."( The relationship between paroxetine and the sparteine oxidation polymorphism.
Allen, A; Allen, GD; Brøsen, K; Cooper, SM; Gram, LF; Hallas, J; Mellows, G; Sindrup, SH; Skjelbo, E; Tasker, TC, 1992
)
1.31
"Paroxetine is a potent and selective inhibitor of the neuronal reuptake of serotonin, thereby facilitating serotoninergic transmission; this action appears to account for the antidepressant activity observed with this drug. "( Paroxetine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in depressive illness.
Clissold, SP; Dechant, KL, 1991
)
3.17
"Paroxetine is a novel antidepressant drug with selective serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitory properties. "( Sleep laboratory studies on the single-dose effects of serotonin reuptake inhibitors paroxetine and fluoxetine on human sleep and awakening qualities.
Anderer, P; Frey, R; Grünberger, J; Krupka, M; Saletu, B; See, WR, 1991
)
1.95
"Paroxetine is a selective serotonin uptake inhibitor, which is being investigated as an antidepressant. "( Paroxetine in the treatment of depression: a comparison with imipramine and placebo.
Boyer, WF; Feighner, JP, 1989
)
3.16
"Paroxetine is a selective and potent inhibitor of 5-hydroxytryptamine uptake into serotonergic neurons. "( Characterization of [3H]paroxetine binding to rat cortical membranes.
Claustre, Y; Graham, D; Habert, E; Langer, SZ; Tahraoui, L, 1985
)
2.02
"[3H]Paroxetine is a highly selective ligand for the 5-hydroxytryptamine transporter complex and the specific binding of this ligand to membrane fractions from cerebral cortex or hippocampus was studied in rats treated with specific inhibitors of the uptake of 5-hydroxytryptamine and monoamine oxidase inhibitors. "( Effect of chronic treatment with selective monoamine oxidase inhibitors and specific 5-hydroxytryptamine uptake inhibitors on [3H]paroxetine binding to cerebral cortical membranes of the rat.
Graham, D; Langer, SZ; Tahraoui, L, 1987
)
1.04
"Paroxetine was shown to be a potent (Ki = 1.1 nM) and specific inhibitor of [3H]-5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) uptake into rat cortical and hypothalamic synaptosomes in vitro. "( Biochemical effects of the antidepressant paroxetine, a specific 5-hydroxytryptamine uptake inhibitor.
Johnson, AM; Nelson, DR; Thomas, DR, 1987
)
1.98
"Paroxetine is a new antidepressant drug. "( Paroxetine in the treatment of depression. A double-blind multicenter study versus mianserin.
Mertens, C; Pintens, H, 1988
)
3.16
"Paroxetine is a novel and selective neuronal 5-hydroxy-tryptamine uptake inhibitor with anti-depressant activity. "( Immunological studies on paroxetine, a novel anti-depressant drug.
Dewdney, JM; Edwards, RG; Henderson, DC; Weston, BJ, 1988
)
2.02
"Paroxetine is a potent and selective inhibitor of serotonin uptake into neurons. "( Autoradiographic localization of 3H-paroxetine-labeled serotonin uptake sites in rat brain.
De Souza, EB; Kuyatt, BL, 1987
)
1.99
"Paroxetine (PAR) is a potent and selective inhibitor of serotonin uptake, and it has been demonstrated that 3H-PAR is a favorable candidate for labeling of the serotonin transport system. "( [Characteristics of 3H-paroxetine-labeled serotonin uptake sites in rat brain].
Yoshida, Y, 1988
)
2.03
"Paroxetine is a new antidepressant drug with potent serotonin (5HT) uptake inhibitory properties. "( Paroxetine in the treatment of depression--a randomized comparison with amitriptyline.
Laursen, AL; le Fèvre Honoré, P; Mikkelsen, PL; Rasmussen, S, 1985
)
3.15

Effects

Paroxetine has a number of advantages as an antidepressant. Of particular interest is its ability to improve sleep early in treatment without daytime sedation or interference with psychomotor function.

Paroxetine has been approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD), obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder (PD), generalised anxiety disorder, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and social anxiety disorder (SAD) in adults. It is of high drug safety and has no significant effect on urine levels of neopterine in MDD patients.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Paroxetine probably has a NOS inhibitory activity either on nNOS or eNOS, in contrast to sertraline and fluoxetine."( Paroxetine inhibited the relaxations induced by EFS in mice corpus cavernosum: is it a NOS inhibition?
Kadioglu, M; Kalyoncu, NI; Kesim, M; Muci, E; Ozyavuz, R; Yaris, E, 2010
)
2.52
"Paroxetine has a beneficial effect on measures of insulin sensitivity and may improve glycemic control. "( Quality of life and metabolic status in mildly depressed women with type 2 diabetes treated with paroxetine: a single-blind randomised placebo controlled trial.
Eriksson, JG; Paile-Hyvärinen, M; Wahlbeck, K, 2003
)
1.98
"Paroxetine has a number of advantages as an antidepressant; of particular interest is its ability to improve sleep early in treatment without daytime sedation or interference with psychomotor function."( The advantages of paroxetine in different subgroups of depression.
Montgomery, SA, 1992
)
1.34
"Paroxetine therapy has been used for treatment of patients with depression and Parkinson's disease (dPD) in many clinical studies, but, the effects of paroxetine in dPD patients are not completely understood. "( The effects of paroxetine therapy on depressive symptom and motor function in the treatment of depression with Parkinson's disease: A meta-analysis.
Chen, ML; Gou, L; Jiang, DQ; Jiang, LL; Mo, Y; Wang, Y; Wu, YL; Zang, QM, 2023
)
2.71
"Paroxetine therapy has clinical benefits for improvement of depressive symptom and motor function in dPD patients, moreover, it is of high drug safety. "( The effects of paroxetine therapy on depressive symptom and motor function in the treatment of depression with Parkinson's disease: A meta-analysis.
Chen, ML; Gou, L; Jiang, DQ; Jiang, LL; Mo, Y; Wang, Y; Wu, YL; Zang, QM, 2023
)
2.71
"Paroxetine has been demonstrated to undergo gestation-related reductions in plasma concentrations, to an extent which is dictated by the polymorphic state of CYP 2D6. "( Precision dosing-based optimisation of paroxetine during pregnancy for poor and ultrarapid CYP2D6 metabolisers: a virtual clinical trial pharmacokinetics study.
Almurjan, A; Badhan, RKS; Macfarlane, H, 2020
)
2.27
"Paroxetine treatment has no significant effect on urine levels of neopterine in MDD patients."( Urinary neopterine levels in patients with major depressive disorder: alterations after treatment with paroxetine and comparison with healthy controls.
Atmaca, M; Güngör, BB; Özdel, K; Özen, NE; Taymur, I, 2015
)
1.35
"Paroxetine has been approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD), obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder (PD), generalised anxiety disorder, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and social anxiety disorder (SAD) in adults, whereas paroxetine CR is approved for the treatment of MDD, SAD, PD and premenstrual dysphoric disorder in adults."( Paroxetine: safety and tolerability issues.
Ham, BJ; Han, C; Marks, DM; Masand, PS; Pae, CU; Park, MH; Patkar, AA, 2008
)
2.51
"Paroxetine has been reported to be useful for management of stuttering symptoms, but only a few reports have examined its effects. "( Investigating the efficacy of paroxetine in developmental stuttering.
Battaglini, PP; Borelli, M; Busan, P; Evaristo, P; Monti, F; Pelamatti, G,
)
1.86
"Paroxetine probably has a NOS inhibitory activity either on nNOS or eNOS, in contrast to sertraline and fluoxetine."( Paroxetine inhibited the relaxations induced by EFS in mice corpus cavernosum: is it a NOS inhibition?
Kadioglu, M; Kalyoncu, NI; Kesim, M; Muci, E; Ozyavuz, R; Yaris, E, 2010
)
2.52
"Paroxetine has become an effectiveness treatment in anxiety disorders in adults. "( [Paroxetine treatment for children and adolescents with anxiety disorders].
Blasco-Fontecilla, H; Calvo Ablanedo, R; Krauskopf Poblete, V; Madoz-Gúrpide, A; San Sebastián Cabasés, J,
)
2.48
"Paroxetine has demonstrated efficacy in depression and anxiety disorders, including generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). "( Efficacy and tolerability of paroxetine for the long-term treatment of generalized anxiety disorder.
Bryson, H; Hewett, K; Iyengar, MK; Jokinen, RH; Lepola, UM; Nordera, G; Stocchi, F, 2003
)
2.05
"Paroxetine has a beneficial effect on measures of insulin sensitivity and may improve glycemic control. "( Quality of life and metabolic status in mildly depressed women with type 2 diabetes treated with paroxetine: a single-blind randomised placebo controlled trial.
Eriksson, JG; Paile-Hyvärinen, M; Wahlbeck, K, 2003
)
1.98
"Paroxetine 20 mg/day has no psychomotor or behavioural toxicity and has no negative impact on BRT. "( A placebo controlled investigation into the effects of paroxetine and mirtazapine on measures related to car driving performance.
Hindmarch, I; Johnsen, S; Meadows, R; Ridout, F, 2003
)
2.01
"Paroxetine has not been compared with cognitive therapy."( Paroxetine: new indication. In social phobia: minimal assessment.
, 2003
)
2.48
"Paroxetine also has been shown to be a potent and selective inhibitor of the human serotonin transporter (SERT) and has recently been demonstrated to have moderate affinity for the norepinephrine transporter (NET)."( Neuropharmacology of paroxetine.
Nemeroff, CB; Owens, MJ, 2003
)
1.36
"Paroxetine also has been shown to improve quality of life, and to improve sleep disturbances, which can be remarkably disabling, in patients with PTSD."( Treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder: the impact of paroxetine.
Davidson, JR, 2003
)
1.28
"Paroxetine has not been reliably compared with benzodiazepines, psychotherapy or buspirone in patients with generalised anxiety."( Paroxetine: new indication. In generalised anxiety: uncertain efficacy.
, 2003
)
2.48
"Paroxetine has been reported to weakly inhibit norepinephrine reuptake and nitric oxide production in addition to increasing serotonergic activity, potentially compounding the vasoconstrictive response."( Transient ischemic attack reported with paroxetine use.
Manos, GH; Wechsler, SM, 2004
)
1.31
"Paroxetine has demonstrated efficacy in treating patients to remission across the range of anxiety disorders studied. "( Remission rates in patients with anxiety disorders treated with paroxetine.
Ballenger, JC, 2004
)
2
"Paroxetine in particular has been speculated to increase the risk of breast cancer. "( Breast cancer risk in a large cohort of female antidepressant medication users.
Chen, W; Enger, SM; Haque, R; Petitti, DB, 2005
)
1.77
"Paroxetine treatment has the potential to cause weight gain and sexual dysfunction, primarily anorgasmia and ejaculatory dysfunction for the long term."( Paroxetine in panic disorder: clinical management and long-term follow-up.
Dannon, PN; Iancu, I; Kotler, M; Lowengrub, K, 2004
)
2.49
"Paroxetine has been the most studied agent in social anxiety disorder and has been shown to be effective in short-term, fixed- and flexible-dose placebo-controlled trials, as well as in long-term treatment."( An evaluation of paroxetine in generalised social anxiety disorder.
Bennett, M; Mancini, C; Patterson, B; Van Ameringen, M, 2005
)
1.39
"Paroxetine has antihypertensive properties during periods of psychological stress in psychiatrically healthy subjects with a history of CAD, and so should be evaluated for potential cardio-protective qualities."( Effects of paroxetine on cardiovascular response to mental stress in subjects with a history of coronary artery disease and no psychiatric diagnoses.
Carson, SW; Davidson, C; Garbutt, JC; Golding, M; Guzzo, J; Hoyler, S; Kotlyar, M; Lazarus, C; Sontz, E, 2005
)
2.16
"Paroxetine has been associated with increased rates of suicidality in adolescents treated in antidepressant clinical trials. "( Brief report: paroxetine in younger and adult individuals at high risk for suicide.
Bauer, MS; Kogan, JN; Marangell, LB; Sachs, G; Thase, ME; Wisniewski, SR, 2006
)
2.14
"Paroxetine has been used widely for treatment of depressed patients with malignancies."( [A case of hyponatremia associated with combination therapy of systemic chemotherapy and paroxetine].
Fujimoto, K; Koizumi, T; Komatsu, Y; Kubo, K; Saegusa, T; Urushihata, K; Yasuo, M, 2006
)
1.28
"Paroxetine has been compared with the standard tricyclic antidepressants in a range of studies, and the efficacy and tolerability data from these studies have been collected together in the worldwide database on paroxetine."( [Clinical effects of serotonin reuptake inhibitors--a review].
Feighner, JP, 1994
)
1.01
"Paroxetine has also shown potential in the symptomatic treatment of diabetic neuropathy; however, further clinical experience is needed to confirm this preliminary result."( Paroxetine. A review of its pharmacology, therapeutic use in depression and therapeutic potential in diabetic neuropathy.
Holliday, SM; Plosker, GL,
)
2.3
"Paroxetine has been shown to be effective in panic disorder in three 10- to 12-week studies. "( Long-term evaluation of paroxetine, clomipramine and placebo in panic disorder. Collaborative Paroxetine Panic Study Investigators.
Judge, R; Lecrubier, Y, 1997
)
2.05
"Paroxetine has also been studied in several other disorders with a presumed serotonergic component, primarily obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and panic disorder."( Paroxetine. An update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in depression and a review of its use in other disorders.
Benfield, P; Gunasekara, NS; Noble, S, 1998
)
2.46
"Paroxetine has demonstrated efficacy in major depression in both young and elderly patients, with an improved tolerability profile over conventional antidepressants."( Paroxetine: a review of clinical experience.
Dunner, D; Kumar, R, 1998
)
2.46
"Paroxetine has little affinity for catecholaminergic, dopaminergic or histaminergic systems and by comparison with tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) has, therefore, a reduced propensity to cause central and autonomic side effects."( Paroxetine: a review.
Bourin, M; Chue, P; Guillon, Y, 2001
)
2.47
"Paroxetine has repeatedly been shown to be effective in the treatment of panic disorder (PD) in adults, and, according to previous case observations, it may be useful in treating children and adolescents with PD as well. "( Paroxetine in child and adolescent outpatients with panic disorder.
Masi, G; Mata, B; Millepiedi, S; Mucci, M; Perugi, G; Toni, C, 2001
)
3.2
"Paroxetine has been characterized as a highly potent and selective 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) reuptake inhibitor. "( Paroxetine: a pharmacological review.
Johnson, AM, 1992
)
3.17
"Paroxetine has been shown to be of similar efficacy to the tricyclic antidepressants but has lower cardiovascular toxicity in animal models and has no effects on heart rate, blood pressure or the electrocardiogram in healthy men receiving single 20-40 mg doses."( Cardiovascular effects of antidepressants: studies of paroxetine in healthy men and depressed patients.
Lewis, Y; Warrington, SJ, 1992
)
1.25
"Paroxetine has a number of advantages as an antidepressant; of particular interest is its ability to improve sleep early in treatment without daytime sedation or interference with psychomotor function."( The advantages of paroxetine in different subgroups of depression.
Montgomery, SA, 1992
)
1.34
"Paroxetine has been found to be superior to placebo and equivalent to amitriptyline, imipramine, clomipramine, and doxepin in treatment of depression."( Paroxetine, sertraline, and fluvoxamine: new selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
Grimsley, SR; Jann, MW, 1992
)
2.45
"Paroxetine has shown some preliminary promise in the treatment of depressive illness resistant to tricyclic antidepressant therapy but further studies are required before any conclusions can be drawn."( Paroxetine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in depressive illness.
Clissold, SP; Dechant, KL, 1991
)
2.45

Actions

Paroxetine failed to suppress the EEG arousal responses induced not only by auditory stimulation but also by electrical stimulation of the mesencephalic reticular formation, centromedian thalamus and posterior hypothalamus. The drug did produce significantly greater improvement than placebo for patients whose illness had lasted more than 1 year.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Paroxetine can inhibit pyroptosis and reduce osteoclast formation via inhibiting the NF-κB signaling pathway, suggesting that it may have therapeutic effects in patients with OA."( Paroxetine Attenuates Chondrocyte Pyroptosis and Inhibits Osteoclast Formation by Inhibiting NF-κB Pathway Activation to Delay Osteoarthritis Progression.
Gao, N; Gong, Y; Hong, H; Hong, Z; Jiang, T; Li, Z; Qiu, J; Zhang, W; Zheng, X, 2023
)
3.8
"Paroxetine may cause adverse outcomes in the neonate when used during pregnancy and should be discontinued in women who are pregnant or trying to become pregnant. "( Paroxetine use during pregnancy: is it safe?
Thormahlen, GM, 2006
)
3.22
"Paroxetine appears to produce an earlier improvement in agitation and psychic anxiety symptoms compared with fluoxetine."( A Canadian multicenter, double-blind study of paroxetine and fluoxetine in major depressive disorder.
Bakish, D; Beauclair, L; Bélanger, MC; Chouinard, G; Manchanda, R; Morris, P; O'Neill, MC; Ravindran, A; Reesal, R; Remick, R; Saxena, B; Vasavan Nair, NP, 1999
)
1.28
"The paroxetine-induced increase in noradrenaline (and 5-HT) was positively correlated with plasma concentrations of the drug, which were around the therapeutic range."( Effect of a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine reuptake inhibitor on brain extracellular noradrenaline: microdialysis studies using paroxetine.
Hajós-Korcsok, E; McTavish, SF; Sharp, T, 2000
)
0.99
"Paroxetine did not suppress the locomotor activity of rats, showing that the described anti-exploratory effect was behaviourally specific to the plus-maze."( 8-OH-DPAT, but not deramciclane, antagonizes the anxiogenic-like action of paroxetine in an elevated plus-maze.
Abramov, U; Beljajev, S; Bourin, M; Kõks, S; Koovit, I; Vasar, E, 2001
)
1.26
"The paroxetine-induced increase in extracellular dopamine concentration, but not 5-HT concentration, was inhibited by the 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonist granisetron."( Effect of paroxetine on extracellular serotonin and dopamine levels in the prefrontal cortex.
Nakayama, K, 2002
)
1.2
"Paroxetine did produce significantly greater improvement than placebo for patients whose illness had lasted more than 1 year, and there was a significant reduction in suicidal ideation."( A placebo-controlled trial of paroxetine in the treatment of major depression.
Glaudin, V; Smith, WT, 1992
)
1.29
"Paroxetine does not inhibit monoamine oxidase in vitro."( An overview of the animal pharmacology of paroxetine.
Johnson, AM, 1989
)
1.26
"Paroxetine failed to suppress the EEG arousal responses induced not only by auditory stimulation but also by electrical stimulation of the mesencephalic reticular formation, centromedian thalamus and posterior hypothalamus, whereas imipramine and amitriptyline markedly inhibited these responses."( Electroencephalographic effects of the new antidepressant paroxetine in the rabbit.
Furuya, Y; Man'no, K; Ohno, M; Ohta, H; Sugihara, K; Tani, Y; Ueki, S; Watanabe, S, 1988
)
1.24

Treatment

Paroxetine treatment led to > 80% serotonin transporter occupancy. Treatment with mirtazapine and venlafaxine during the second hospitalization caused clonus and disturbance of consciousness, and these adverse effects resulted in a prolonged period of hospitalization.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Paroxetine treatment was started (titrated from 5 to 40 mg/day) and doubled each week."( When to Choose Paroxetine Treatment in Skin-Picking Disorder: A Case Report.
Arıkan, MK; İlhan, R; Mat, MC; Oba, MÇ, 2023
)
1.98
"Paroxetine treatment led to > 80% serotonin transporter occupancy. "( Efficacy of Chronic Paroxetine Treatment in Mitigating Amyloid Pathology and Microgliosis in APPSWE/PS1ΔE9 Transgenic Mice.
Finsen, B; Gramsbergen, JB; Hasselstrøm, J; Lambertsen, KL; Metaxas, A; Olesen, LØ; Severino, M; Sivasaravanaparan, M; von Linstow, CU; Wiborg, O, 2022
)
2.49
"Paroxetine (37.5 mg/day) treatment during the first hospitalization did not cause any side effects, but treatment with mirtazapine (15 mg/day) and venlafaxine (150 mg/day) during the second hospitalization caused clonus and disturbance of consciousness, and these adverse effects resulted in a prolonged period of hospitalization."( A case of mood disorder with severe side effects of antidepressants in association with resistance to thyroid hormone beta with a THRB mutation.
Hasegawa, C; Komahashi-Sasaki, H; Maehara, R; Shimoda, K; Yasui-Furukori, N, 2022
)
1.44
"Paroxetine treatment also blocks epinephrine-induced upregulation of hypertrophic and fibrotic genes as well as ADRB1 internalization in cardiomyocytes."( Paroxetine Attenuates Cardiac Hypertrophy Via Blocking GRK2 and ADRB1 Interaction in Hypertension.
Cai, J; Huang, Y; Jiang, W; Lu, Y; Peng, L; Sun, X; Wen, G; Wu, J; Yuan, H; Zhou, M, 2021
)
2.79
"tDCS-paroxetine co-treatment had variable effects on 5-HT1A receptors and SERT mRNA."( Antidepressant action of transcranial direct current stimulation in olfactory bulbectomised adolescent rats.
Bambico, FR; Blundell, J; Conway, JD; Dinesh, OC; Hasan, SN; Nobrega, JN; Raymond, R; Waye, SC, 2021
)
1.08
"Paroxetine treatment increased the levels of proinflammatory cytokines IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-6 and decreased Th2 cytokine levels."( Differences in immunomodulatory properties between venlafaxine and paroxetine in patients with major depressive disorder.
Chen, CY; Ho, PS; Huang, CC; Huang, SY; Kuo, SC; Liang, CS; Lu, RB; Shyu, JF; Yeh, YW; Yen, CH, 2018
)
1.44
"Paroxetine treatment was suspended, and after 48 h IOP was 10 mm Hg in both eyes (BE)."( Chronic angle-closure glaucoma related to paroxetine treatment.
Garcia-Feijoo, J; Gonzelez-Romero, JC; Saenz-Frances, F; Santos-Bueso, E; Sierra-Rodriguez, MA, 2013
)
1.38
"Paroxetine 7.5 mg treatment also significantly increased nighttime sleep duration (week 4, +31 vs +16 min for placebo; P = 0.0075), but no significant between-group differences in sleep-onset latency or sleep-related adverse events such as sedation were observed."( Low-dose paroxetine (7.5 mg) improves sleep in women with vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause.
Bhaskar, S; Joffe, H; Kazempour, K; Lippman, J; Mekonnen, H; Pinkerton, JV, 2015
)
1.56
"Paroxetine treatment had minimal effect on bHR/bLR dams' pregnancy outcomes or maternal behavior."( Early-life exposure to the SSRI paroxetine exacerbates depression-like behavior in anxiety/depression-prone rats.
Akil, H; Clinton, SM; Cohen, JL; Fant, AD; Glover, ME; Jackson, NL; Pugh, PC, 2015
)
1.42
"Paroxetine treatment of macrophages, however, significantly inhibited LPS-induced IL-6 production."( Paroxetine differentially modulates LPS-induced TNFα and IL-6 production in mouse macrophages.
Durairaj, H; Parameswaran, N; Steury, MD, 2015
)
2.58
"Paroxetine treatment has no significant effect on urine levels of neopterine in MDD patients."( Urinary neopterine levels in patients with major depressive disorder: alterations after treatment with paroxetine and comparison with healthy controls.
Atmaca, M; Güngör, BB; Özdel, K; Özen, NE; Taymur, I, 2015
)
1.35
"Paroxetine treatment did not affect acquisition or expression of fear-potentiated startle, suggesting that disturbed fear learning in SERT(-/-) results from developmental changes and not from reduced SERT functioning."( Lifelong disturbance of serotonin transporter functioning results in fear learning deficits: Reversal by blockade of CRF1 receptors.
Baas, JM; Bijlsma, EY; Groenink, L; Hendriksen, H; Millan, MJ, 2015
)
1.14
"Paroxetine treatment also induced infralimbic neuronal activation."( Paroxetine treatment, following behavioral suppression of PTSD-like symptoms in mice, prevents relapse by activating the infralimbic cortex.
Ba-M'hamed, S; Bennis, M; Bentefour, Y; Garcia, R; Rakibi, Y, 2016
)
2.6
"Paroxetine-treated long-time floating (PLF) and paroxetine-treated short-time floating (PSF) groups were stratified as proxies for drug non-responder and responder mice, respectively."( Purine and pyrimidine metabolism: Convergent evidence on chronic antidepressant treatment response in mice and humans.
Asara, JM; Dournes, C; Filiou, MD; Gassen, NC; Ising, M; Müller, MB; Park, DI; Rein, T; Sillaber, I; Turck, CW; Uhr, M; Webhofer, C, 2016
)
1.16
"Paroxetine treatment, both in HCs and PD patients, induced a mean 9% increase per subject in LDL-C that normalized post-discontinuation, suggesting causality."( Paroxetine-induced increase in LDL cholesterol levels.
Abadia, MC; Baker, G; Gil, L; Lara, N; Le Melledo, JM; Mailo, K; Perez-Parada, J; Van Ameringen, M, 2009
)
2.52
"Paroxetine CR treatment resulted in a significant increase in verbal declarative memory function in the group as a whole, as measured by the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised, the Selective Reminding Test, and novel paragraph recall, and explicit recall of neutral words. "( Neuropsychological functioning in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder following short-term paroxetine treatment.
Afzal, N; Ashraf, A; Bremner, JD; Fani, N; Jawed, F; Kitayama, N; Reed, L, 2009
)
2.01
"Paroxetine treatment could reverse the suppressive effect of corticosterone on ciliary body cell proliferation."( Roles of paroxetine and corticosterone on adult mammalian ciliary body cell proliferation.
Lau, BW; Lee, TM; Leung, N; Li, SY; So, KF; Tang, SW; Wang, H; Wang, NL; Yau, SY, 2010
)
1.5
"Paroxetine-treated patients were significantly more improved than placebo-treated patients."( A randomized, controlled trial of aerobic exercise in combination with paroxetine in the treatment of panic disorder.
Bandelow, B; Broocks, A; Engel, K; Neubert, K; Wedekind, D; Weiss, N, 2010
)
1.32
"Paroxetine pretreatment inhibits CYP2D6 without inducing relevant changes in oxycodone exposure, and partially blunts the pharmacodynamic effects of oxycodone due to intrinsic pharmacological activities."( Effect of the inhibition of CYP3A4 or CYP2D6 on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oxycodone.
Drewe, J; Hammann, F; Krähenbühl, S; Kummer, O; Moser, C; Schaller, O, 2011
)
1.09
"The paroxetine treatment group also experienced significant increases in depressive symptoms, clinical global severity scores and difficulty in social functioning; the fluoxetine treatment group did not."( Discontinuation symptoms: comparison of brief interruption in fluoxetine and paroxetine treatment.
Jacobson, JG; Judge, R; Parry, MG; Quail, D, 2002
)
1.02
"Paroxetine treatment induced significant decrease in platelet 5-HT concentrations in both responders and nonresponders, while no alterations in platelet 5-HT values were found in tianeptine-treated patients."( The effects of paroxetine and tianeptine on peripheral biochemical markers in major depression.
Jakovljević, M; Mihaljević-Peles, A; Mück-Seler, D; Pivac, N; Sagud, M, 2002
)
1.39
"Paroxetine was used for treatment but was productive in only the first two cases."( The effect of paroxetine on Taijinkyofusho: a report of three cases.
Kobayashi, N; Kurauchi, S; Nomura, S; Sano, SY; Sawamura, T; Shigemura, J, 2003
)
1.4
"Paroxetine treatment completely blocked 5-HT uptake into the thalamocortical fibers as indicated by the negative 5-HT-im in cortical barrel areas."( Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor disrupts organization of thalamocortical somatosensory barrels during development.
Sari, Y; Xu, Y; Zhou, FC, 2004
)
1.04
"Paroxetine treatment was significantly superior to placebo at weeks 3 through 12 on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale, the Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness scale, and the Social Phobia Inventory, and at weeks 4 through 12 for response (P < .05 for all)."( Venlafaxine extended release vs placebo and paroxetine in social anxiety disorder.
Gelenberg, AJ; Liebowitz, MR; Munjack, D, 2005
)
1.31
"Paroxetine treatment has the potential to cause weight gain and sexual dysfunction, primarily anorgasmia and ejaculatory dysfunction for the long term."( Paroxetine in panic disorder: clinical management and long-term follow-up.
Dannon, PN; Iancu, I; Kotler, M; Lowengrub, K, 2004
)
2.49
"Paroxetine treatment desensitized 5-HT(1A) receptor-mediated increases in oxytocin, ACTH and corticosterone to a comparable extent in all offspring and reduced the E(max) for ACTH only in prenatal cocaine-exposed offspring."( Paroxetine is effective in desensitizing 5-HT1A receptor function in adult offspring exposed prenatally to cocaine.
Battaglia, G; Carrasco, GA; Chen, Z; Muma, NA; Shankaran, M; Sripathirathan, K; Tetzlaff, J; Van De Kar, LD, 2005
)
2.49
"With paroxetine pretreatment, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of (+)- and (-)-tramadol was increased (37% [P = .001] and 32% [P = .002], respectively), and the corresponding AUCs of(+)- and (-)-M1 were decreased (67% [P = .0004] and 40% [P = .0008], respectively). "( Paroxetine, a cytochrome P450 2D6 inhibitor, diminishes the stereoselective O-demethylation and reduces the hypoalgesic effect of tramadol.
Brøsen, K; Enggaard, TP; Laugesen, S; Pedersen, RS; Sindrup, SH, 2005
)
2.29
"Paroxetine-treated patients showed greater (P < .05) improvements than placebo-treated patients on the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale."( A randomized controlled trial of paroxetine for noncardiac chest pain.
Beebe, KL; Beyer, JL; Clary, GL; Doraiswamy, PM; Hellegers, C; Krishnan, KR; Newby, LK; O'Connor, C; O'Connor, JF; Varia, I; Wagner, HR, 2006
)
1.34
"Paroxetine treatment ameliorated the spatial navigation deficit in 3xTgAD male and female mice, without affecting swim speed or distance traveled, suggesting a preservation of cognitive function."( Prophylactic treatment with paroxetine ameliorates behavioral deficits and retards the development of amyloid and tau pathologies in 3xTgAD mice.
Brown, M; Clark, RF; Gray, AJ; Guo, Z; Halagappa, VM; Iyun, T; Martin, B; Matsuoka, Y; Mattson, MP; Maudsley, S; Nelson, RL; Pearson, M, 2007
)
1.35
"More paroxetine-treated patients withdrew due to adverse events than escitalopram- or placebo-treated patients."( Escitalopram in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a randomized, placebo-controlled, paroxetine-referenced, fixed-dose, 24-week study.
Andersen, EW; Fineberg, N; Stein, DJ; Tonnoir, B, 2007
)
1.02
"The paroxetine vehicle treated rats showed anhedonia even 14 days after acute dexamethasone administration."( Repeated paroxetine treatment reverses anhedonia induced in rats by chronic mild stress or dexamethasone.
Andreatini, R; Casarotto, PC, 2007
)
1.24
"Paroxetine-treatment group, in contrast, shows a 34% increase in cell proliferation."( Corticosteroid decreases subventricular zone cell proliferation, which could be reversed by paroxetine.
Helmeste, DM; Lau, WM; Lee, TM; Qiu, G; So, KF; Tang, SW, 2007
)
1.28
"In paroxetine-treated females these differences remained statistically significant."( A monoamine oxidase B gene variant and short-term antidepressant treatment response.
Dahmen, N; Kohnen, R; Müller, MJ; Rujescu, D; Stassen, HH; Szegedi, A; Tadić, A, 2007
)
0.85
"The paroxetine pretreated rats did not show these cytokine changes following IFNalpha treatment."( Role of paroxetine in interferon-alpha-induced immune and behavioural changes in male Wistar rats.
Kaim-Basta, A; Kenny, C; Kim, YK; Kubera, M; Leonard, BE; Myint, AM; O'Mahony, S; Steinbusch, HW, 2007
)
1.25
"Paroxetine treatment was discontinued on day 1 and atrioventricular block resolved on day 5, which was confirmed with a 24-hour Holter recording."( Complete atrioventricular block associated with concomitant use of metoprolol and paroxetine.
Bekar, L; Cumurcu, BE; Onalan, O, 2008
)
1.29
"The paroxetine treatment did not alter the sensitivity of this alpha 2-adrenoceptor in the hypothalamus."( Modulation of 5-HT release in the guinea-pig brain following long-term administration of antidepressant drugs.
Blier, P; Bouchard, C, 1994
)
0.77
"Paroxetine treatment caused a reduction in 5-HT immunoreactivity which was maximal 6 h after administration."( Contributions of raphe-cortical and thalamocortical axons to the transient somatotopic pattern of serotonin immunoreactivity in rat cortex.
Bennett-Clarke, CA; Chiaia, NL; Rhoades, RW, 1997
)
1.02
"Paroxetine treatment resulted in a twofold to 21-fold decrease in CYP2D6 activity (p < 0.001). "( Paroxetine potentiates the central nervous system side effects of perphenazine: contribution of cytochrome P4502D6 inhibition in vivo.
Herrmann, N; Kalow, W; Naranjo, CA; Ozdemir, V; Reed, K; Sellers, EM, 1997
)
3.18
"Paroxetine-treated subjects received a psychotherapy tailored for traumatic grief."( A post hoc comparison of paroxetine and nortriptyline for symptoms of traumatic grief.
Houck, PR; Jacobs, S; Miller, MD; Prigerson, HG; Reynolds, CF; Shear, MK; Zygmont, M, 1998
)
1.32
"Paroxetine treatment costs also appear to be similar to those of amitriptyline and imipramine in terms of expected costs per patient."( Paroxetine. A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its use in depression.
Whittington, R; Wilde, MI, 1995
)
2.46
"One paroxetine-treated subject did not exhibit any CYP2D6 inhibition."( CYP2D6 status of extensive metabolizers after multiple-dose fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, or sertraline.
Alfaro, CL; Ereshefsky, L; Lam, YW; Simpson, J, 1999
)
1.01
"Paroxetine treatment reduced platelet 5-HT to 17% of baseline after 4 weeks of treatment. "( Pretreatment platelet 5-HT concentration predicts the short-term response to paroxetine in major depression. Grupo de Trastornos Afectivos.
Alvarez, E; Artigas, F; Figueras, G; Pérez, V; San Martino, O, 1999
)
1.97
"Paroxetine treatment (19.7 +/- 4.7 mg/day for 105 +/- 37 days) resulted in a significant improvement in the frequency and intensity of panic attacks and also on the state anxiety inventory."( Effects of paroxetine on heart period variability in patients with panic disorder: a study of holter ECG records.
Igel, G; Jampala, VC; Kay, J; Sobelewski, E; Yeragani, VK, 1999
)
1.41
"Paroxetine treatment increased the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC) of (R)- and (S)-metoprolol significantly (169 to 1,340 ng x h/mL [P < .001] and 279 to 1,418 ng x h/mL [P < .001], respectively), with an approximately twofold increase in both maximum plasma concentration and terminal elimination half-life. "( Paroxetine affects metoprolol pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy volunteers.
Belpaire, FM; De Vriendt, C; Hemeryck, A; Lefebvre, RA, 2000
)
3.19
"Paroxetine and drug-free treatment did not affect any of these parameters."( Effects of antidepressants on weight and on the plasma levels of leptin, TNF-alpha and soluble TNF receptors: A longitudinal study in patients treated with amitriptyline or paroxetine.
Haack, M; Hinze-Selch, D; Kraus, T; Kühn, M; Pollmächer, T; Schuld, A; Uhr, M, 2000
)
1.22
"Paroxetine treatment improved symptoms of social anxiety, as measured by the LSAS, compared with placebo."( Therapeutic advances: paroxetine for the treatment of social anxiety disorder.
Bobes, J; Lydiard, RB, 2000
)
1.34
"Paroxetine-treated patients experienced a significant weight increase, fluoxetine-treated patients had a modest but nonsignificant weight decrease, and patients treated with sertraline had a modest but nonsignificant weight increase."( Fluoxetine versus sertraline and paroxetine in major depressive disorder: changes in weight with long-term treatment.
Fava, M; Hoog, SL; Judge, R; Koke, SC; Nilsson, ME, 2000
)
1.31
"Mean paroxetine treatment duration was 11.7 +/- 8.3 months, with a mean final dosage of 23.9 +/- 9.8 mg/day (range, 10-40 mg/day)."( Paroxetine in child and adolescent outpatients with panic disorder.
Masi, G; Mata, B; Millepiedi, S; Mucci, M; Perugi, G; Toni, C, 2001
)
2.21
"Paroxetine treatment at the dose of 80 mg per day induced hypomania in a 37-year-old female with dysthymia and trichitillomania."( Dose-response relationship of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors treatment-emergent hypomania in depressive disorders.
Ramasubbu, R, 2001
)
1.03
"Paroxetine-treated patients in both dose groups demonstrated significantly greater improvement on primary outcome measures compared to placebo-treated patients in the intent-to-treat analysis. "( Efficacy and safety of paroxetine treatment for chronic PTSD: a fixed-dose, placebo-controlled study.
Beebe, KL; Marshall, RD; Oldham, M; Zaninelli, R, 2001
)
2.06
"Paroxetine treatment did not affect neuroactive steroid concentrations, which were highly stable over 24 weeks."( GABA(A) receptor-modulating neuroactive steroid composition in patients with panic disorder before and during paroxetine treatment.
di Michele, F; Holsboer, F; Pasini, A; Romeo, E; Rupprecht, R; Ströhle, A; Yassouridis, A, 2002
)
1.25
"Paroxetine pretreatment (10 mg kg-1, 30 min before-hand) reduced this uptake by 73%."( Effects of monoamine uptake inhibitors on extracellular and platelet 5-hydroxytryptamine in rat blood: different effects of clomipramine and fluoxetine.
Artigas, F; Ortiz, J, 1992
)
1
"Treatment with paroxetine reduced cell viability, which was associated with marked increase in apoptosis, in both the cell lines."( Anticancer activity of paroxetine in human colon cancer cells: Involvement of MET and ERBB3.
Jang, WJ; Jeong, CH; Jung, SK; Vo, TTL, 2019
)
1.16
"Treatment with paroxetine was performed per os with a dosage of 20 mg/g BW."( Chronic social stress during adolescence: interplay of paroxetine treatment and ageing.
Liebl, C; Müller, MB; Scharf, SH; Schmidt, MV; Sterlemann, V, 2013
)
0.98
"Pretreatment with paroxetine increased the mean peak plasma concentrations (Cmax ) for unchanged nebivolol (1·78 ± 1·17 vs. "( A pharmacokinetic drug interaction study between nebivolol and paroxetine in healthy volunteers.
Achim, M; Bocsan, C; Briciu, C; Buzoianu, A; Gheldiu, AM; Muntean, D; Neag, M; Popa, A; Vlase, L, 2014
)
0.98
"Treatment of paroxetine-induced penile anesthesia in Post SSRI Sexual Dysfunction (PSSD) by Low-power Laser Irradiation (LPLI) is unknown in medical literature. "( Penile anesthesia in Post SSRI Sexual Dysfunction (PSSD) responds to low-power laser irradiation: a case study and hypothesis about the role of transient receptor potential (TRP) ion channels.
Georgiadis, J; Schweitzer, DH; van Coevorden, RS; Waldinger, MD, 2015
)
0.79
"Treatment with paroxetine delays the decline in locomotion, in exploration and risk assessment behaviour, found in the APP/PS1 mice."( Behavioural Phenotyping of APPswe/PS1δE9 Mice: Age-Rrelated Changes and Effect of Long-Term Paroxetine Treatment.
Bouzinova, EV; Finsen, B; Hasselstrøm, JB; Olesen, LØ; Severino, M; Sivasaravanaparan, M; Wiborg, O, 2016
)
0.99
"Treatment with paroxetine prevented degeneration of nigrostriatal DA neurons, increased striatal dopamine levels, and improved motor function."( Paroxetine prevents loss of nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons by inhibiting brain inflammation and oxidative stress in an experimental model of Parkinson's disease.
Chung, YC; Jin, BK; Kim, SR, 2010
)
2.14
"Pre-treatment with paroxetine did not alter the thresholds for perception and discomfort during isobaric (4.7 +/- 2.3 vs. "( Influence of the selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor, paroxetine, on gastric sensorimotor function in humans.
Broekaert, D; Coulie, B; Fischler, B; Janssens, J; Tack, J, 2003
)
0.89
"Pre-treatment with paroxetine enhances gastric accommodation to a meal. "( Influence of the selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor, paroxetine, on gastric sensorimotor function in humans.
Broekaert, D; Coulie, B; Fischler, B; Janssens, J; Tack, J, 2003
)
0.89
"Treatment with paroxetine was associated with a significant improvement in standard social-phobia scores, although most patients remained symptomatic."( Paroxetine: new indication. In social phobia: minimal assessment.
, 2003
)
2.1
"Pretreatment with paroxetine partially reduced MDMA effects on CD4 T and NK cells, whereas totally inhibiting the suppression of the immune response to mitogens and alterations in cytokines release."( Paroxetine inhibits acute effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine on the immune system in humans.
Bacosi, A; de la Torre, R; Di Carlo, S; Farré, M; Ortuño, J; Pacifici, R; Pichini, S; Roset, PN; Segura, J; Segura, M; Zuccaro, P, 2004
)
2.09
"Pretreatment with paroxetine reduced the effects of 8-OH-DPAT on ejaculation in a dose-dependent manner and more strongly than fluvoxamine."( Effects of chronic selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on 8-OH-DPAT-induced facilitation of ejaculation in rats: comparison of fluvoxamine and paroxetine.
Cools, AR; de Jong, TR; Olivier, B; Pattij, T; Veening, JG; Waldinger, MD, 2005
)
0.85
"Treatment with paroxetine did not significantly increase QTcB or QTcF or any ECG parameters compared with placebo."( Analysis of electrocardiographic data following use of paroxetine in pediatric depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Carpenter, DJ; Fong, R; Horrigan, JP; Krulewicz, S; Lipschitz, A; Perera, P; Wagner, KD, 2006
)
0.92
"Pretreatment with paroxetine was associated with marked decreases of both physiological and subjective effects of MDMA, despite a 30% increase in MDMA plasma concentrations."( Pharmacological interaction between 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (ecstasy) and paroxetine: pharmacological effects and pharmacokinetics.
Abanades, S; de la Torre, R; Farré, M; O'Mathúna, B; Peiró, AM; Roset, PN; Segura, M; Torrens, M, 2007
)
0.89
"Treatment with paroxetine controlled-release may constitute an efficacious alternative for symptomatic perimenopausal and postmenopausal women after menopausal hormone discontinuation."( Paroxetine versus placebo for women in midlife after hormone therapy discontinuation.
Cohen, LS; Joffe, H; Petrillo, L; Rydzewski, M; Soares, CN; Somley, B; Viguera, AC; Yehezkel, R, 2008
)
2.14
"Treatment with paroxetine began at a median of 17 months (range, 6-139 months) after the loss."( A post hoc comparison of paroxetine and nortriptyline for symptoms of traumatic grief.
Houck, PR; Jacobs, S; Miller, MD; Prigerson, HG; Reynolds, CF; Shear, MK; Zygmont, M, 1998
)
0.94
"Treatment with paroxetine (0.1-2 mg/kg) reduced the number of open arm visits and time spent in open arms, and the ratio between open and total arm entries in the elevated plus-maze."( 8-OH-DPAT, but not deramciclane, antagonizes the anxiogenic-like action of paroxetine in an elevated plus-maze.
Abramov, U; Beljajev, S; Bourin, M; Kõks, S; Koovit, I; Vasar, E, 2001
)
0.88
"Treatment with paroxetine was well tolerated, and the number and type of adverse events recorded in the paroxetine group correspond to the known safety profile of this medication."( Paroxetine in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: results of a placebo-controlled, flexible-dosage trial.
Bellew, KM; Burnham, DB; Goddard, A; Iyengar, MK; McCafferty, JP; Pollack, MH; Zaninelli, R, 2001
)
2.09
"Treatment with paroxetine significantly increased the baseline prolactin level independently of treatment response but positively correlated with paroxetine dose."( Prolactin response to dl-fenfluramine challenge before and after treatment with paroxetine.
Dulchin, MC; Ellis, SP; Li, S; Malone, KM; Mann, JJ; Oquendo, MA, 2001
)
0.88
"Treatment with paroxetine was well tolerated, with the frequency and type of adverse events recorded for the paroxetine group corresponding to the known safety profile of this medication."( Paroxetine in the treatment of chronic posttraumatic stress disorder: results of a placebo-controlled, flexible-dosage trial.
Dillingham, K; Pitts, CD; Ruggiero, L; Tucker, P; Yehuda, R; Zaninelli, R, 2001
)
2.09
"Pretreatment with paroxetine dramatically altered the metabolism and kinetics of both tracers and appeared to displace both ligands primarily from regions with high SERT density."( Comparison of (+)-(11)C-McN5652 and (11)C-DASB as serotonin transporter radioligands under various experimental conditions.
Dannals, RF; Hilton, J; Mathews, WB; McCann, UD; Owonikoko, T; Ravert, HT; Ricaurte, GA; Scheffel, U; Szabo, Z; Wilson, AA, 2002
)
0.64

Toxicity

Tianeptine appears to be as effective and as safe as paroxetine for the ambulatory treatment of major depression. Nausea and constipation occurred significantly more often with paroxetsine than with imipramine.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" This is the first report of such a side effect associated with paroxetine use in man."( Extra pyramidal side effects associated with paroxetine.
Nicholson, SD, 1992
)
0.78
" The adverse events reported with paroxetine were most likely to occur early in the course of treatment and there was no evidence of any increase in events in the elderly or with longer-term treatment."( Paroxetine: an overview of dosage, tolerability, and safety.
Jenner, PN, 1992
)
2.01
" Nausea and constipation occurred significantly more often with paroxetine, but only 9% of paroxetine patients dropped out of the study due either in whole or in part to an adverse effect."( The safety and efficacy of paroxetine compared with placebo in a double-blind trial of depressed outpatients.
Claghorn, JL, 1992
)
0.82
" Furthermore, paroxetine is relatively safe in overdose and has very little anticholinergic activity."( The safety profile of paroxetine.
Blumhardt, CL; Boyer, WF, 1992
)
0.96
" However, a comparison of the relative toxic effects of MDMA and MBDB indicates that MBDB may be slightly less neurotoxic."( Neurotoxic effects of the alpha-ethyl homologue of MDMA following subacute administration.
Johnson, MP; Nichols, DE, 1989
)
0.28
" The central monoamine stores of rats were significantly decreased with reserpine (5 mg/kg) prior to toxic injections of MDMA."( Reserpine does not prevent 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity in the rat.
Hekmatpanah, CR; McKenna, DJ; Peroutka, SJ, 1989
)
0.28
" As with other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, the most common side effect associated with paroxetine treatment is nausea, although this effect rarely leads to dose reduction or drug discontinuation."( Paroxetine: an overview of the efficacy and safety of a new selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor in the treatment of depression.
Nemeroff, CB, 1993
)
1.94
" The fates of SSRI-associated sexual adverse effects and clinical managements of restoring these side effects were described."( Female sexual side effects associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: a descriptive clinical study of 33 patients.
Hsu, JH; Shen, WW, 1995
)
0.29
"With some limitations in interpreting the data, the findings of this study suggest that SSRI-associated female sexual dysfunction occurs at a higher rate than we previously thought, equal potentials in implicating female sexual side effects among three SSRIs, and the absence or the low incidence of female sexual adverse effects from bupropion, and that these side effects can be managed by waiting for a spontaneous remission, dosage reduction of SSRIs, substitution with bupropion and other antidepressants, or the use of an antidote."( Female sexual side effects associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: a descriptive clinical study of 33 patients.
Hsu, JH; Shen, WW, 1995
)
0.29
" There were 188 adverse events: insomnia, dizziness, headache, nausea, dry mouth and myoclonic jerks were the most common."( Safety and tolerability of combined treatment with moclobemide and SSRIs: a systematic study of 50 patients.
Hawley, CJ; McPhee, S; Pattinson, HA; Quick, SJ; Ratnam, S, 1996
)
0.29
"To study the adverse drug reaction (ADR) profile of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRI) in Belgium and the Netherlands."( [Reports of suspected side effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in Belgium and The Netherlands].
Kurz, X; Ottervanger, JP; Roisin, T; Stricker, BH; Van Ermen, AM, 1996
)
0.29
"All adverse reactions of fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine and sertraline, reported between the moment of registration of these drugs and January 1st 1995, were assessed for causality."( [Reports of suspected side effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in Belgium and The Netherlands].
Kurz, X; Ottervanger, JP; Roisin, T; Stricker, BH; Van Ermen, AM, 1996
)
0.55
"At the national monitoring centres of Belgium and of the Netherlands adverse reactions were reported 78 and 537 times, respectively."( [Reports of suspected side effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in Belgium and The Netherlands].
Kurz, X; Ottervanger, JP; Roisin, T; Stricker, BH; Van Ermen, AM, 1996
)
0.29
" More adverse reactions were reported in the Netherlands than in Belgium."( [Reports of suspected side effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in Belgium and The Netherlands].
Kurz, X; Ottervanger, JP; Roisin, T; Stricker, BH; Van Ermen, AM, 1996
)
0.29
"Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are becoming widely used because of their favorable side-effect profile and their safety in overdose."( Reversible hepatotoxicity of paroxetine in a patient with major depression.
Boerner, RJ; Hegerl, U; Helmchen, C; Meyendorf, R, 1996
)
0.59
" We have addressed the question of whether there is a 'serotonin withdrawal syndrome' by analysis of spontaneous reports of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with four SSRIs."( A comparison of the post-marketing safety of four selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors including the investigation of symptoms occurring on withdrawal.
MacKay, AV; Price, JS; Waller, PC; Wood, SM, 1996
)
0.29
" Hyponatraemia has previously been described as an adverse effect to fluoxetine and paroxetine, but not to citalopram."( [Adverse effects of selective serotonin uptake inhibitors. Hyponatremia caused by Schwartz-Bartter syndrome].
Almdal, TP; Christensen, O; Sørensen, HA, 1996
)
0.52
" Overall, 27% of the SSRI-treated patients had no adverse sexual side effects; in contrast, 86% of patients treated with bupropion had no adverse sexual effects, and 77% of bupropion-treated patients reported at least one aspect of heightened sexual functioning."( Comparative sexual side effects of bupropion, fluoxetine, paroxetine, and sertraline.
DePalma, RL; Katholi, CR; Modell, JD; Modell, JG, 1997
)
0.54
"SSRI-induced adverse sexual effects appear to be the rule rather than the exception and may be substantially underreported unless patients are specifically asked about the effects of these medications on various aspects of sexual function."( Comparative sexual side effects of bupropion, fluoxetine, paroxetine, and sertraline.
DePalma, RL; Katholi, CR; Modell, JD; Modell, JG, 1997
)
0.54
"English-language articles identified through MEDLINE (1985 through 1997), and case reports from the American Association of Poison Control Centers (AAPCC) (1987 through 1996) and United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) adverse event database (through 1997) that describe findings of fatal and nonfatal overdoses involving SSRIs alone or in combination with other ingestants were reviewed."( SSRI safety in overdose.
Barbey, JT; Roose, SP, 1998
)
0.3
" At very high doses (> 75 times the common daily dose), more serious adverse events, including seizures, electrocardiogram (ECG) changes, and decreased consciousness may occur."( SSRI safety in overdose.
Barbey, JT; Roose, SP, 1998
)
0.3
"The article focuses on adverse drug reactions (ADR) to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) concerning libido and sexual behaviour: cases of disinhibition of libido observed at the Psychiatric Hospital of Kilchberg near Zurich are described."( Disinhibition of libido: an adverse effect of SSRI?
Erazo, N; Greil, W; Grohmann, R; Horvath, A; Sassim, N, 2001
)
0.31
"Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are widely used in the treatment of depressive and obsessive-compulsive disorders because of their low-frequency adverse effects."( [Cutaneous adverse effects during selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors therapy: 2 cases].
Fiszenson, F; Grob, JJ; Jean Pastor, MJ; Jreissati, M; Richard, MA,
)
0.13
"Adverse cutaneous effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are rare but the knowledge of these reactions is important because toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens-Johnson syndrome had been reported during fluoxetine (Prozac(R)) and fluvoxamine (Floxyfral(R)) treatment."( [Cutaneous adverse effects during selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors therapy: 2 cases].
Fiszenson, F; Grob, JJ; Jean Pastor, MJ; Jreissati, M; Richard, MA,
)
0.13
" Assessments included Clinical Global Impression Scales, Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression and Anxiety, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale and the Patient Global Assessment Scale, in addition to a review of reported adverse events, vital sign measurements, electrocardiograms and clinical laboratory tests."( A randomized, double-blind controlled comparison of nefazodone and paroxetine in the treatment of depression: safety, tolerability and efficacy in continuation phase treatment.
Baldwin, DS; Hawley, CJ; Mellors, K, 2001
)
0.55
"Tianeptine appears to be as effective and as safe as paroxetine for the ambulatory treatment of major depression."( Efficacy and safety of tianeptine in major depression: evidence from a 3-month controlled clinical trial versus paroxetine.
Azoulay, P; Septien, L; Waintraub, L, 2002
)
0.78
" The tolerability evaluation was based on incidence of adverse events and routine laboratory tests."( Efficacy and safety of amisulpride 50 mg versus paroxetine 20 mg in major depression: a randomized, double-blind, parallel group study.
Cassano, GB; Jori, MC, 2002
)
0.57
" This study evaluates a clinician-administered scale, the Toronto Side Effect Scale (TSES), in a natural practice clinic."( Antidepressant side effects in depression patients treated in a naturalistic setting: a study of bupropion, moclobemide, paroxetine, sertraline, and venlafaxine.
Bagby, RM; Kennedy, SH; Vanderkooy, JD, 2002
)
0.52
" A measure of side-effect intensity distinguished paroxetine from the other antidepressants on a measure of sexual dysfunction."( Antidepressant side effects in depression patients treated in a naturalistic setting: a study of bupropion, moclobemide, paroxetine, sertraline, and venlafaxine.
Bagby, RM; Kennedy, SH; Vanderkooy, JD, 2002
)
0.78
"These results confirm the clinical utility of the TSES as a simple, clinician-administered antidepressant side-effect scale."( Antidepressant side effects in depression patients treated in a naturalistic setting: a study of bupropion, moclobemide, paroxetine, sertraline, and venlafaxine.
Bagby, RM; Kennedy, SH; Vanderkooy, JD, 2002
)
0.52
" As to the occurence of common adverse effects, no marked difference between subjects converted into the PM group and those who had no history of such conversion was found."( Paroxetine-induced conversion of cytochrome P450 2D6 phenotype and occurence of adverse effects.
Hadasová, E; Zourková, A, 2003
)
1.76
"The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 and Geriatric Depression Scale, severity of adverse events and dosing compliance indexes, and discontinuations due to adverse events."( Effects of the serotonin transporter gene promoter polymorphism on mirtazapine and paroxetine efficacy and adverse events in geriatric major depression.
Hollander, SB; Kremer, C; Murphy, GM; Rodrigues, HE; Schatzberg, AF, 2004
)
0.55
" However, the 5HTTLPR polymorphism had a dramatic effect on adverse events."( Effects of the serotonin transporter gene promoter polymorphism on mirtazapine and paroxetine efficacy and adverse events in geriatric major depression.
Hollander, SB; Kremer, C; Murphy, GM; Rodrigues, HE; Schatzberg, AF, 2004
)
0.55
"Although adverse events are a key factor in compliance, their evolution during treatment with antidepressants is poorly documented."( What happens with adverse events during 6 months of treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors?
Albert, A; De Bruyckere, K; Demyttenaere, K; Dewé, W; Mesters, P; Sangeleer, M, 2005
)
0.33
" At each visit, the presence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events were assessed systematically using the UKU Side Effect Rating Scale (UKU)."( What happens with adverse events during 6 months of treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors?
Albert, A; De Bruyckere, K; Demyttenaere, K; Dewé, W; Mesters, P; Sangeleer, M, 2005
)
0.33
"Overall, the number of at least moderately severe adverse events decreased with time."( What happens with adverse events during 6 months of treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors?
Albert, A; De Bruyckere, K; Demyttenaere, K; Dewé, W; Mesters, P; Sangeleer, M, 2005
)
0.33
"The time course of adverse events varies with the severity of depression, sex, completer or dropout status, and recurrent versus first-episode depression."( What happens with adverse events during 6 months of treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors?
Albert, A; De Bruyckere, K; Demyttenaere, K; Dewé, W; Mesters, P; Sangeleer, M, 2005
)
0.33
" Irrespective of the mechanism, we recommend that all neonates exposed to antidepressants, particularly serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), during the last trimester should be followed-up closely for adverse symptoms commencing in the first 10 days after birth."( Neonatal symptoms following maternal paroxetine treatment: serotonin toxicity or paroxetine discontinuation syndrome?
Clarke, P; Haddad, PM; Pal, BR; Sridhiran, S; Wieck, A, 2005
)
0.6
"5 million adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports for 8620 drugs/biologics that are listed for 1191 Coding Symbols for Thesaurus of Adverse Reaction (COSTAR) terms of adverse effects."( Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
Benz, RD; Contrera, JF; Kruhlak, NL; Matthews, EJ; Weaver, JL, 2004
)
0.32
" The drug was safe and well tolerable."( [Clinical effectiveness and safety of paroxetine in post-stroke depression: results from a phase 4, open label, multicenter clinical trial with 26 weeks of follow-up].
Andor, G; Harcos, P; Horváth, S; Karányi, Z; Nagy, Z; Németh, G, 2006
)
0.6
" Clinicians should select antidepressants considering their pharmacologic profiles and avoiding adverse effects."( [Review of pharmacological efficacies and side effects of antidepressants].
Ikenouchi-Sugita, A; Nakamura, J; Yoshimura, R, 2007
)
0.34
" Adverse events occurring in 10% of patients or more with adjunctive placebo or aripiprazole were akathisia (4."( The efficacy and safety of aripiprazole as adjunctive therapy in major depressive disorder: a second multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Berman, RM; Carson, WH; Fava, M; Hennicken, D; Marcus, RN; McQuade, RD; Simon, JS; Thase, ME; Trivedi, MH, 2008
)
0.35
"We wanted to determine to what extent adverse drug effects associated with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) were known but not assessed before application for registration of paroxetine."( Common adverse events associated with an SSRI: meta-analysis of early paroxetine data.
Aursnes, I; Gjertsen, MK, 2008
)
0.77
"At the time of registration 19 of the adverse effects were statistically significant."( Common adverse events associated with an SSRI: meta-analysis of early paroxetine data.
Aursnes, I; Gjertsen, MK, 2008
)
0.58
"Frequently occurring adverse reactions that are included in today's SPC for paroxetine were evident and documented already in the early studies accompanying the application for marketing authorization in 1989."( Common adverse events associated with an SSRI: meta-analysis of early paroxetine data.
Aursnes, I; Gjertsen, MK, 2008
)
0.81
" The case indicates that emerging adverse effects via the pharmacokinetic interaction of these drugs when switching patients from fluvoxamine to paroxetine can occur."( A case with occurring adverse effects when cross-over titration from fluvoxamine to paroxetine associated with increasing the plasma fluvoxamine level in major depressive disorder.
Hori, H; Ikenouchi-Sugita, A; Nakamura, J; Ueda, N; Umene-Nakano, W; Yoshimura, R, 2009
)
0.78
"The authors sought to identify predictors of self-harm adverse events in treatment-resistant, depressed adolescents during the first 12 weeks of treatment."( Predictors of spontaneous and systematically assessed suicidal adverse events in the treatment of SSRI-resistant depression in adolescents (TORDIA) study.
Asarnow, J; Birmaher, B; Brent, DA; Clarke, GN; Debar, LL; Emslie, GJ; Iyengar, S; Keller, MB; Kennard, B; Leonard, H; Mayes, TL; McCracken, JT; Onorato, M; Porta, G; Ritz, L; Ryan, ND; Spirito, A; Strober, M; Suddath, R; Vitiello, B; Zelazny, J, 2009
)
0.35
", suicidal and non-suicidal self-injury adverse events were assessed by spontaneous report for the first 181 participants, and by systematic weekly assessment for the last 153 participants."( Predictors of spontaneous and systematically assessed suicidal adverse events in the treatment of SSRI-resistant depression in adolescents (TORDIA) study.
Asarnow, J; Birmaher, B; Brent, DA; Clarke, GN; Debar, LL; Emslie, GJ; Iyengar, S; Keller, MB; Kennard, B; Leonard, H; Mayes, TL; McCracken, JT; Onorato, M; Porta, G; Ritz, L; Ryan, ND; Spirito, A; Strober, M; Suddath, R; Vitiello, B; Zelazny, J, 2009
)
0.35
"2%), but not serious adverse events (8."( Predictors of spontaneous and systematically assessed suicidal adverse events in the treatment of SSRI-resistant depression in adolescents (TORDIA) study.
Asarnow, J; Birmaher, B; Brent, DA; Clarke, GN; Debar, LL; Emslie, GJ; Iyengar, S; Keller, MB; Kennard, B; Leonard, H; Mayes, TL; McCracken, JT; Onorato, M; Porta, G; Ritz, L; Ryan, ND; Spirito, A; Strober, M; Suddath, R; Vitiello, B; Zelazny, J, 2009
)
0.35
"Since predictors of suicidal adverse events also predict poor response to treatment, and many of these events occurred early in treatment, improving the speed of response to depression, by targeting of family conflict, suicidal ideation, and drug use may help to reduce their incidence."( Predictors of spontaneous and systematically assessed suicidal adverse events in the treatment of SSRI-resistant depression in adolescents (TORDIA) study.
Asarnow, J; Birmaher, B; Brent, DA; Clarke, GN; Debar, LL; Emslie, GJ; Iyengar, S; Keller, MB; Kennard, B; Leonard, H; Mayes, TL; McCracken, JT; Onorato, M; Porta, G; Ritz, L; Ryan, ND; Spirito, A; Strober, M; Suddath, R; Vitiello, B; Zelazny, J, 2009
)
0.35
" Agomelatine is probably hepatotoxic; (8) In summary, agomelatine has unproven efficacy and poorly documented adverse effects."( Agomelatine: new drug. Adverse effects and no proven efficacy.
, 2009
)
0.35
" An understanding of structure-activity relationships (SARs) of chemicals can make a significant contribution to the identification of potential toxic effects early in the drug development process and aid in avoiding such problems."( Developing structure-activity relationships for the prediction of hepatotoxicity.
Fisk, L; Greene, N; Naven, RT; Note, RR; Patel, ML; Pelletier, DJ, 2010
)
0.36
" Although differences in risks for and prognoses of several diseases have been well documented, sex-based differences in responses to pharmaceutical treatments and accompanying risks of adverse events are less clear."( Differences in efficacy and safety of pharmaceutical treatments between men and women: an umbrella review.
Chapman, A; Gartlehner, G; Strobelberger, M; Thaler, K, 2010
)
0.36
" There was no statistical significance among treatment arms in remission rates, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events."( A pilot study of the efficacy and safety of paroxetine augmented with risperidone, valproate, buspirone, trazodone, or thyroid hormone in adult Chinese patients with treatment-resistant major depression.
Calabrese, JR; Cao, L; Chen, J; Cui, X; Fang, Y; Gao, K; Hong, W; Jiang, K; Wang, Y; Wu, Z; Xu, Y; Yi, Z; Yuan, C, 2011
)
0.63
" The most common adverse effects (AEs) with GSK372475 were dry mouth, headache, insomnia, and nausea."( Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a triple reuptake inhibitor GSK372475 in the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder: two randomized, placebo- and active-controlled clinical trials.
Alexander, R; Archer, G; Evoniuk, G; Graff, O; Krishnan, KR; Lavergne, A; Learned, S; Moate, R; Modell, JG; Ratti, E; Roychowdhury, S; Zamuner, S, 2012
)
0.38
" Our system employs a sequential, propensity score-matched framework and signalling rules for prospective drug safety monitoring and identified signals for all three adverse drug reactions evaluated."( Early steps in the development of a claims-based targeted healthcare safety monitoring system and application to three empirical examples.
Avorn, J; Bohn, RL; Daniel, GW; Eisenberg, DF; Gagne, JJ; Patrick, AR; Rassen, JA; Rodgers, JK; Schneeweiss, S; Wahl, PM; Wasser, TE; Wilson, M, 2012
)
0.38
"7 ng/ml, which can cause systemic adverse effects in patients at risk."( Paroxetine markedly increases plasma concentrations of ophthalmic timolol; CYP2D6 inhibitors may increase the risk of cardiovascular adverse effects of 0.5% timolol eye drops.
Backman, JT; Kautiainen, H; Mäenpää, J; Neuvonen, M; Neuvonen, PJ; Niemi, M; Volotinen-Maja, M, 2014
)
1.85
"The use of a statistical approach to analyze cumulative adverse event (AE) reports has been encouraged by regulatory authorities."( Effect of database profile variation on drug safety assessment: an analysis of spontaneous adverse event reports of Japanese cases.
Anzai, T; Hashiguchi, M; Hinomura, Y; Kawaguchi, G; Marui, H; Matsushita, Y; Mochizuki, M; Nomura, K; Takahashi, K, 2015
)
0.42
" All reported adverse events were considered to be mild."( Pharmacokinetics and safety of paroxetine controlled-release tablet in healthy Chinese subjects: a single-dose three-period crossover study.
Chen, R; Hu, P; Shen, K, 2016
)
0.72
"It has been suggested that the efficacy of antidepressants has been overestimated in clinical trials owing to unblinding of drug treatments by adverse events."( Efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and adverse events: meta-regression and mediation analysis of placebo-controlled trials.
Barbui, C; Barth, M; Cipriani, A; Klostermann, S; Kriston, L; Linde, K, 2016
)
0.43
"To investigate the association between adverse events and the efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)."( Efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and adverse events: meta-regression and mediation analysis of placebo-controlled trials.
Barbui, C; Barth, M; Cipriani, A; Klostermann, S; Kriston, L; Linde, K, 2016
)
0.43
" Reporting of adverse events was used as an indicator of tolerability."( Efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and adverse events: meta-regression and mediation analysis of placebo-controlled trials.
Barbui, C; Barth, M; Cipriani, A; Klostermann, S; Kriston, L; Linde, K, 2016
)
0.43
"Our results do not support, but also do not unequivocally disprove, the hypothesis that adverse events lead to an overestimation of the effect of SSRIs over placebo."( Efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and adverse events: meta-regression and mediation analysis of placebo-controlled trials.
Barbui, C; Barth, M; Cipriani, A; Klostermann, S; Kriston, L; Linde, K, 2016
)
0.43
"Many adverse drug reactions are caused by the cytochrome P450 (CYP)-dependent activation of drugs into reactive metabolites."( Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
Jones, LH; Nadanaciva, S; Rana, P; Will, Y, 2016
)
0.43
" The aim of this study was to examine the features and prevalence of adverse effects of paroxetine and sertraline in breastfed infants."( Short-Term Safety of Paroxetine and Sertraline in Breastfed Infants: A Retrospective Cohort Study from a University Hospital.
Arpaci, N; Uguz, F, 2016
)
0.98
"The prevalence rate of adverse events in the infants was 12."( Short-Term Safety of Paroxetine and Sertraline in Breastfed Infants: A Retrospective Cohort Study from a University Hospital.
Arpaci, N; Uguz, F, 2016
)
0.75
"The results suggest that the prevalence rate of adverse events in the infants exposed to sertraline or paroxetine is relatively low and mostly mild."( Short-Term Safety of Paroxetine and Sertraline in Breastfed Infants: A Retrospective Cohort Study from a University Hospital.
Arpaci, N; Uguz, F, 2016
)
0.97
" In the continuation and taper phases combined there were 211 adverse events in the paroxetine group, 147 on imipramine and 100 on placebo."( Study 329 continuation phase: Safety and efficacy of paroxetine and imipramine in extended treatment of adolescent major depression.
Abi-Jaoude, E; Healy, D; Jureidini, J; Le Noury, J; Nardo, JM; Raven, M; Tufanaru, C, 2016
)
0.91
" Relapse and adverse events on both active drugs open up the risks of a prescribing cascade."( Study 329 continuation phase: Safety and efficacy of paroxetine and imipramine in extended treatment of adolescent major depression.
Abi-Jaoude, E; Healy, D; Jureidini, J; Le Noury, J; Nardo, JM; Raven, M; Tufanaru, C, 2016
)
0.68
"This is the first study to compare frequency of sexual side effect reporting between paroxetine and desipramine."( A Comparison of Sexual Side Effects of Antidepressants With and Without Naltrexone.
Petrakis, I; Ralevski, E; Thapa, M,
)
0.36
" The combined dapoxetine with sildenafil therapy could significantly improve PE patients without ED as compared to paroxetine alone or dapoxetine alone or sildenafil alone with tolerated adverse effects."( Comparison of the clinical efficacy and safety of the on-demand use of paroxetine, dapoxetine, sildenafil and combined dapoxetine with sildenafil in treatment of patients with premature ejaculation: A randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Abdelhamed, A; Abu El-Hamd, M, 2018
)
0.92
" The laboratory test abnormity, and observed and self-reported adverse events were all assessed as the measurements of safety and tolerability."( Efficacy and Safety of Agomelatine vs Paroxetine Hydrochloride in Chinese Han Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: A Multicentre, Double-Blind, Noninferiority, Randomized Controlled Trial.
Gao, KR; Li, HF; Shen, YF; Yu, H; Yu, YM, 2018
)
0.75
" The incidence of overall adverse events was similar in the 2 groups (agomelatine 49."( Efficacy and Safety of Agomelatine vs Paroxetine Hydrochloride in Chinese Han Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: A Multicentre, Double-Blind, Noninferiority, Randomized Controlled Trial.
Gao, KR; Li, HF; Shen, YF; Yu, H; Yu, YM, 2018
)
0.75
" Due to many contradictory findings on the adverse effects and toxicities of SSRIs (especially genotoxicities), we reviewed the genotoxic effects of these drugs."( A Systematic Review on the Genotoxic Effects of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors.
Abbaszadegan, MR; Ahmadimanesh, M; Hedayati, N; Jamialahmadi, T; Sahebkar, A; Yazdian-Robati, R, 2021
)
0.62
" The data analytical platform Molecular Health Effect was utilized to map population ADR data from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System to chemical and biological databases (such as UniProt and Reactome), for hypothesis generation regarding the underlying molecular mechanisms causing cardiotoxicity."( A case study of a patient-centered reverse translational systems-based approach to understand adverse event profiles in drug development.
Jackson, DB; Kim, S; Lahu, G; Lesko, LJ; Soldatos, TG; Trame, MN; Vakilynejad, M, 2022
)
0.72
"5 mg/day) treatment during the first hospitalization did not cause any side effects, but treatment with mirtazapine (15 mg/day) and venlafaxine (150 mg/day) during the second hospitalization caused clonus and disturbance of consciousness, and these adverse effects resulted in a prolonged period of hospitalization."( A case of mood disorder with severe side effects of antidepressants in association with resistance to thyroid hormone beta with a THRB mutation.
Hasegawa, C; Komahashi-Sasaki, H; Maehara, R; Shimoda, K; Yasui-Furukori, N, 2022
)
0.72
" Adverse events (AEs) were also recorded."( Efficacy and Safety of Jianpi Jieyu Decoction for Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Depression of Xin (Heart)-Pi (Spleen) Deficiency Syndrome: A Multi-centre Randomized Controlled Study.
Cao, J; Chen, D; Chen, JX; Chen, X; Guo, CL; Han, XY; Hong, X; Jiao, XZ; Jiao, YX; Li, MX; Liang, S; Liu, HM; Meng, S; Qi, JX; Wang, TT; Zhao, Y, 2023
)
0.91
" Numerous studies in the past few decades have focused on the beneficial effects of PRX on depression, however, the toxic properties and the potential mechanisms remain unclear."( Paroxetine induced larva zebrafish cardiotoxicity through inflammation response.
Gu, J; Ji, G; Song, F; Wu, L; Wu, W; Zhu, Y, 2023
)
2.35

Pharmacokinetics

The objective of this study was to evaluate genetic and pharmacokinetic factors to establish the pharmacotherapeutic effect of paroxetine (PAX) in patients with panic disorder (PD) The time (tmax ) to reach Cmax was 1·37 ± 0·88 (h) for the parent compound and its active metabolite after nebivolol administered alone. Paroxetne influenced nebivilol pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers, but it did not have a significant effect on nebivlol pharmacodynamic parameters measured at rest.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"The pharmacokinetic properties of the newer specific serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitors are reviewed."( Pharmacokinetics of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
DeVane, CL, 1992
)
0.28
" In nearly all extensive metabolizers the concentration-dose data were best described by a pharmacokinetic model assuming elimination by at least two kinetically distinct processes, one a high-affinity saturable process and one a low-affinity linear process."( Pharmacokinetics of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine: nonlinearity and relation to the sparteine oxidation polymorphism.
Brøsen, K; Gram, LF; Sindrup, SH, 1992
)
0.52
" Also, steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters are not predictable from single-dose data."( A review of the metabolism and pharmacokinetics of paroxetine in man.
Greb, WH; Haddock, RE; Kaye, CM; Langley, PF; Mellows, G; Tasker, TC; Zussman, BD, 1989
)
0.53
"To evaluate the pharmacokinetic properties, efficacy, and tolerability of paroxetine in elderly depressed patients, a clinical study was set up--initially at Aalborg Psychiatric Hospital in Denmark, and subsequently at the University Hospital in Linköping, Sweden."( Paroxetine: pharmacokinetic and antidepressant effect in the elderly.
Fjord-Larsen, T; Lundmark, J; Manniche, PM; Mengel, H; Møller-Nielsen, EM; Pauser, H; Scheel Thomsen, I; Wålinder, J, 1989
)
1.95
" From a clinical point of view, it is of relevance that potency to inhibit the cytochrome P450 isozyme CYP2D6 gradually decreases from paroxetine, fluoxetine, norfluoxetine, desmethylcitalopram, fluvoxamine, and sertraline down to citalopram, explaining to a great extent differences in pharmacokinetic interactions between the SSRIs and tricyclic antidepressants, which are metabolized by this enzyme."( Comparative pharmacokinetics of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: a look behind the mirror.
Baumann, P; Rochat, B, 1995
)
0.49
" The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of paroxetine taken together indicate that this selective serotonin uptake inhibitor seems advantageous to other antidepressant agents because of its high selectivity and poor toxicity."( [Paroxetine: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics].
Hiemke, C, 1994
)
1.45
" An approximately 10-fold increase in the Cmax and AUC(24) of paroxetine and an approximately 2-fold increase in these parameters for sertraline occurred simultaneously with the desipramine concentration changes."( Desipramine pharmacokinetics when coadministered with paroxetine or sertraline in extensive metabolizers.
Alderman, J; Allison, J; Chung, M; Greenblatt, DJ; Harrison, W; Penenberg, D; Preskorn, SH, 1997
)
0.79
" In light of recent reports that the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants may be weak CYP3A4 inhibitors, this study was designed to investigate the effects of paroxetine on the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile of terfenadine."( Paroxetine does not affect the cardiac safety and pharmacokinetics of terfenadine in healthy adult men.
Benincosa, LJ; Etheredge, RC; Everitt, DE; Jorkasky, DK; Martin, DE; Zussman, BD, 1997
)
1.93
"None of the pharmacokinetic parameters of thiothixene were significantly altered by a 3-day treatment with paroxetine."( The effect of paroxetine on thiothixene pharmacokinetics.
Bader, G; Guthrie, SK; Hariharan, M; Kumar, AA; Tandon, R, 1997
)
0.87
" Estimation of the mean elimination half-life of clozapine 2 weeks after start of fluvoxamine comedication revealed an increase from 17 hours to about 50 hours whereas there was no change under paroxetine coadministration."( Pharmacokinetic interactions of clozapine with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: differential effects of fluvoxamine and paroxetine in a prospective study.
Anghelescu, I; Härter, S; Hiemke, C; Szegedi, A; Weigmann, H; Wetzel, H; Wiesner, J, 1998
)
0.7
" A single 10-mg dose of paroxetine was then administered followed by 5 days of blood and urine collection for pharmacokinetic analyses."( Paroxetine pharmacokinetics in depressed children and adolescents.
Blumer, JL; Branicky, L; Fiala, S; Findling, RL; Myers, C; O'Riordan, MA; Reed, MD; Waldorf, B, 1999
)
2.05
" The mean half-life of paroxetine was 11."( Paroxetine pharmacokinetics in depressed children and adolescents.
Blumer, JL; Branicky, L; Fiala, S; Findling, RL; Myers, C; O'Riordan, MA; Reed, MD; Waldorf, B, 1999
)
2.06
" They differ, however, in their pharmacokinetic properties."( Pharmacokinetics of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
Härtter, S; Hiemke, C, 2000
)
0.31
" At the end of each study week, the steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters of nortriptyline or paroxetine were determined within the dose interval."( Inhibition of cytochrome P4502D6 activity with paroxetine normalizes the ultrarapid metabolizer phenotype as measured by nortriptyline pharmacokinetics and the debrisoquin test.
Andersson, K; Bertilsson, L; Härtter, S; Laine, K; Svensson, JO; Tybring, G; Widén, J, 2001
)
0.79
" The published literature contains a substantial amount of supportive data documenting the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of paroxetine."( Pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, and tolerability of paroxetine and paroxetine CR.
DeVane, CL, 2003
)
0.76
" Potential pharmacokinetic advantages of these formulations include lower peak plasma drug concentrations and smaller fluctuations between peak and trough plasma drug concentrations, which might influence the tolerability of these medications."( Immediate-release versus controlled-release formulations: pharmacokinetics of newer antidepressants in relation to nausea.
DeVane, CL, 2003
)
0.32
" A comparison is also presented between several methods based on animal pharmacokinetic data, using the same set of proprietary compounds, and it lends further support for the use of this method, as opposed to methods that require the gathering of pharmacokinetic data in laboratory animals."( Prediction of human volume of distribution values for neutral and basic drugs. 2. Extended data set and leave-class-out statistics.
Gao, F; Lombardo, F; Obach, RS; Shalaeva, MY, 2004
)
0.32
" The present study reports the pharmacokinetic results of up to eight serum samples per patient."( Serum disposition of sertraline, N-desmethylsertraline and paroxetine: a pharmacokinetic evaluation of repeated drug concentration measurements during 6 months of treatment for major depression.
Aberg-Wistedt, A; Agren, H; Akerblad, AC; Bengtsson, F; Höglund, P; Reis, M, 2004
)
0.57
" Pharmacokinetic sampling and safety assessments occurred at baseline and subsequently on the final treatment day of each dosing level."( Multiple dose pharmacokinetics of paroxetine in children and adolescents with major depressive disorder or obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Bartolic, EI; Carpenter, DJ; Danoff, TM; Findling, RL; Fong, R; Gaedigk, A; Gomeni, R; Leeder, JS; Nucci, G; Piergies, AA, 2006
)
0.61
"To develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model using sparse sampling of long-term treatment with paroxetine in elderly depressed subjects, incorporating CYP2D6 genotype as well as other covariates."( Paroxetine: population pharmacokinetic analysis in late-life depression using sparse concentration sampling.
Bies, RR; Feng, Y; Ferrell, RE; Kimak, MA; Pollock, BG; Reynolds, CF, 2006
)
1.99
" This study investigated the pharmacokinetic variability of aripiprazole and the active metabolite dehydroaripiprazole on the basis of 155 drug monitoring samples from psychiatric patients treated with therapeutic doses of aripiprazole (10-30 mg/day)."( Pharmacokinetic variability of aripiprazole and the active metabolite dehydroaripiprazole in psychiatric patients.
Lunde, H; Lunder, N; Molden, E; Refsum, H, 2006
)
0.33
" Although elimination half-life differed significantly (16."( Effect of itraconazole on pharmacokinetics of paroxetine: the role of gut transporters.
Inoue, Y; Kaneko, S; Niioka, T; Saito, M; Sato, Y; Yasui-Furukori, N, 2007
)
0.6
"A rapid and validated liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometric method (LC-MS-MS) has been developed and applied to pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence studies in 24 healthy male Korean volunteers."( Determination of paroxetine in plasma by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry for pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence studies.
Hur, Y; Jeon, YC; Jhee, OH; Kang, JS; Kim, KH; Lee, HS; Lee, MH; Lee, SE; Lee, SH; Seo, HK; Shaw, LM, 2007
)
0.68
" The aim of the study was to evaluate the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interaction between paroxetine and MDMA in humans."( Pharmacological interaction between 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (ecstasy) and paroxetine: pharmacological effects and pharmacokinetics.
Abanades, S; de la Torre, R; Farré, M; O'Mathúna, B; Peiró, AM; Roset, PN; Segura, M; Torrens, M, 2007
)
0.78
"The plasma concentration curve of paroxetine following a single oral dose administration conformed to the two-compartment open model."( [Pharmacokinetics of paroxetine tablet in healthy Chinese volunteers].
Lin, YH; Liu, WX; Liu, WZ; Liu, Y; Wang, HC; Yang, H; Zhu, J, 2008
)
0.94
"It can be concluded that the single-dose pharmacokinetic profile of ramosetron 10 microg is not affected to a clinically relevant degree by paroxetine 20 mg once daily administered for 10 days."( The effect of paroxetine on the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of ramosetron in healthy subjects.
den Adel, M; Kadokura, T; Krauwinkel, WJ; Nishida, A; Takeshige, T, 2008
)
0.91
" pharmacokinetic data on 670 drugs representing, to our knowledge, the largest publicly available set of human clinical pharmacokinetic data."( Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
Lombardo, F; Obach, RS; Waters, NJ, 2008
)
0.35
"The objective of this study was to evaluate genetic and pharmacokinetic factors affecting the initial pharmacotherapeutic effect of paroxetine (PAX) in Japanese patients with panic disorder (PD)."( Genetic and pharmacokinetic factors affecting the initial pharmacotherapeutic effect of paroxetine in Japanese patients with panic disorder.
Akiyama, K; Hirokane, G; Inoue, Y; Morita, S; Saeki, Y; Saito, A; Shimoda, K; Ueda, M; Watanabe, T; Yamada, N, 2009
)
0.78
"To describe a case of flecainide-induced delirium associated with a pharmacokinetic drug interaction with paroxetine."( Delirium in a patient with toxic flecainide plasma concentrations: the role of a pharmacokinetic drug interaction with paroxetine.
Gugger, JJ; Tsao, YY, 2009
)
0.78
" A MEDLINE search (1966-January 2009) revealed one in vivo pharmacokinetic study on the interaction between flecainide, a CYP2D6 substrate, and paroxetine, a CYP2D6 inhibitor, as well as 3 case reports of flecainide-induced delirium."( Delirium in a patient with toxic flecainide plasma concentrations: the role of a pharmacokinetic drug interaction with paroxetine.
Gugger, JJ; Tsao, YY, 2009
)
0.76
"This randomized, crossover study examined the effects of paroxetine (a potent CYP2D6 inhibitor) on the pharmacokinetic parameters of a single dose of the novel antipsychotic agent, paliperidone extended-release tablets (paliperidone ER), in healthy subjects."( The effects of paroxetine on the pharmacokinetics of paliperidone extended-release tablets.
Berwaerts, J; Chang, I; Cleton, A; Eerdekens, M; Herben, V; van de Vliet, I; van Hoek, P, 2009
)
0.95
"Results suggest that no clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interaction occurs when paroxetine and paliperidone ER are co-administered and, therefore, initiation or discontinuation of concomitant treatment with CYP2D6-inhibiting drugs does not appear to warrant an adjustment in paliperidone ER dosage."( The effects of paroxetine on the pharmacokinetics of paliperidone extended-release tablets.
Berwaerts, J; Chang, I; Cleton, A; Eerdekens, M; Herben, V; van de Vliet, I; van Hoek, P, 2009
)
0.93
" These results demonstrate a pharmacokinetic interaction between paroxetine and both formulations of metoprolol."( Influence of metoprolol dosage release formulation on the pharmacokinetic drug interaction with paroxetine.
Bleske, BE; Brook, R; Kerber, K; Nielsen, J; Shea, M; Stout, SM; Welage, LS, 2011
)
0.83
"to assess the impact of paroxetine coadministration on the stereoselective pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of carvedilol."( The impact of paroxetine coadministration on stereospecific carvedilol pharmacokinetics.
Bleske, BE; Brook, R; Kerber, K; Nielsen, J; Shea, M; Stout, SM; Welage, LS, 2010
)
1.03
" We performed a three-way, placebo-controlled, double-blind cross-over study to assess the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic consequences of drug interactions with oxycodone."( Effect of the inhibition of CYP3A4 or CYP2D6 on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oxycodone.
Drewe, J; Hammann, F; Krähenbühl, S; Kummer, O; Moser, C; Schaller, O, 2011
)
0.37
"Inhibition of CYP3A4 by ketoconazole increases the exposure and some pharmacodynamic effects of oxycodone."( Effect of the inhibition of CYP3A4 or CYP2D6 on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oxycodone.
Drewe, J; Hammann, F; Krähenbühl, S; Kummer, O; Moser, C; Schaller, O, 2011
)
0.37
" Plasma concentrations of oxycodone and its oxidative metabolites were measured over 48 hours, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters subsequently evaluated."( Effect of inhibition of cytochrome P450 enzymes 2D6 and 3A4 on the pharmacokinetics of intravenous oxycodone: a randomized, three-phase, crossover, placebo-controlled study.
Grönlund, J; Hagelberg, NM; Laine, K; Neuvonen, PJ; Olkkola, KT; Saari, TI, 2011
)
0.37
" However, data on potential drug-drug interactions between tamsulosin and inhibitors of CYP2D6 and 3A4 are limited and information on potential pharmacodynamic consequences of such pharmacokinetic interactions is missing."( Effects of strong CYP2D6 and 3A4 inhibitors, paroxetine and ketoconazole, on the pharmacokinetics and cardiovascular safety of tamsulosin.
Mattheus, M; Mehlburger, L; Michel, MC; Tatami, S; Troost, J; Tsuda, Y; Wein, M, 2011
)
0.63
"85), respectively, and increased the terminal half-life (t(1/2) ) of tamsulosin HCl from 11."( Effects of strong CYP2D6 and 3A4 inhibitors, paroxetine and ketoconazole, on the pharmacokinetics and cardiovascular safety of tamsulosin.
Mattheus, M; Mehlburger, L; Michel, MC; Tatami, S; Troost, J; Tsuda, Y; Wein, M, 2011
)
0.63
"The objective of this study was to evaluate genetic and pharmacokinetic factors to establish the pharmacotherapeutic effect of paroxetine (PAX) in patients with panic disorder (PD)."( Determinants of pharmacodynamic trajectory of the therapeutic response to paroxetine in Japanese patients with panic disorder.
Akiyama, K; Hayashi, Y; Inoue, Y; Ishiguro, S; Kato, K; Saeki, Y; Saito, A; Shimoda, K; Ueda, M; Watanabe, T, 2011
)
0.81
"After receiving metoprolol on days 1 (before paroxetine) and 8 (after paroxetine), S- and R-metoprolol pharmacokinetic parameters and exercise heart rate and blood pressure responses were measured."( Effects of paroxetine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of immediate-release and extended-release metoprolol.
Parker, RB; Soberman, JE, 2011
)
1.02
" The lack of pharmacokinetic data and clinical trials currently limits the use of this drug in clinical avian practice."( Pharmacokinetics of paroxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, in Grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus erithacus): influence of pharmaceutical formulation and length of dosing.
Fink-Gremmels, J; Haritova, A; Lumeij, JT; Schoemaker, NJ; Smit, JW; van Maarseveen, EM; van Zeeland, YR, 2013
)
0.71
"Conducting pharmacokinetic (PK) studies in pregnant women is challenging."( A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model to predict disposition of CYP2D6 and CYP1A2 metabolized drugs in pregnant women.
Isoherranen, N; Ke, AB; Nallani, SC; Rostami-Hodjegan, A; Unadkat, JD; Zhao, P, 2013
)
0.39
"To develop a pharmacokinetic model able to describe the nonlinear pharmacokinetics of paroxetine (PRX) and to predict the drug-drug interaction between PRX and metoprolol under various dosage regimens."( Pharmacokinetic model incorporating mechanism-based inactivation of CYP2D6 can explain both non-linear kinetics and drug interactions of paroxetine.
Hori, S; Mikami, A; Ohtani, H; Sawada, Y, 2013
)
0.82
"A pharmacokinetic model of PRX incorporating mechanism-based inhibition was developed."( Pharmacokinetic model incorporating mechanism-based inactivation of CYP2D6 can explain both non-linear kinetics and drug interactions of paroxetine.
Hori, S; Mikami, A; Ohtani, H; Sawada, Y, 2013
)
0.59
"This Phase I, open-label, single- and multiple-dose study evaluated the pharmacokinetic properties, safety and tolerability of LDMP in postmenopausal, nonsmoking women aged ≥40 years."( Pharmacokinetic properties of once-daily oral low-dose mesylate salt of paroxetine (LDMP 7.5 mg) following single and multiple doses in healthy postmenopausal women.
Bhaskar, S; Cristina Castelli, M; Lippman, J, 2013
)
0.62
" Blood samples were collected predose and up to 120 hours postdose on day 1 (single-dose pharmacokinetic profile), at predose (after 12 doses) on day 18, and at predose and up to 24 hours postdose on day 19 (multiple-dose pharmacokinetic profile)."( Pharmacokinetic properties of once-daily oral low-dose mesylate salt of paroxetine (LDMP 7.5 mg) following single and multiple doses in healthy postmenopausal women.
Bhaskar, S; Cristina Castelli, M; Lippman, J, 2013
)
0.62
" On day 1, median Tmax was ~6 hours, and mean t1/2 was 17."( Pharmacokinetic properties of once-daily oral low-dose mesylate salt of paroxetine (LDMP 7.5 mg) following single and multiple doses in healthy postmenopausal women.
Bhaskar, S; Cristina Castelli, M; Lippman, J, 2013
)
0.62
" We characterized the transplacental transfer of paroxetine in perfused human placenta, fitting a pharmacokinetic model to the results and applying the model and parameters to evaluate a tapered dosage regimen."( Characterization of transplacental transfer of paroxetine in perfused human placenta: development of a pharmacokinetic model to evaluate tapered dosing.
Fujii, T; Hori, S; Matsuoka, S; Nagai, M; Ohtani, H; Satoh, H; Sawada, Y; Taketani, Y, 2013
)
0.9
" The pharmacokinetic parameters of nebivolol and its active metabolite were analysed by non-compartmental modelling."( A pharmacokinetic drug interaction study between nebivolol and paroxetine in healthy volunteers.
Achim, M; Bocsan, C; Briciu, C; Buzoianu, A; Gheldiu, AM; Muntean, D; Neag, M; Popa, A; Vlase, L, 2014
)
0.64
" The time (tmax ) to reach Cmax was 1·37 ± 0·88 (h) and 3·11 ± 1·76 (h) for the parent compound and its active metabolite after nebivolol administered alone and 3·96 ± 1·76 (h), respectively, 7·33 ± 7·84 (h) after pretreatment with paroxetine."( A pharmacokinetic drug interaction study between nebivolol and paroxetine in healthy volunteers.
Achim, M; Bocsan, C; Briciu, C; Buzoianu, A; Gheldiu, AM; Muntean, D; Neag, M; Popa, A; Vlase, L, 2014
)
0.83
" Paroxetine influenced nebivolol pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers, but it did not have a significant effect on nebivolol pharmacodynamic parameters measured at rest, although the clinical relevance of this drug interaction needs further investigation."( A pharmacokinetic drug interaction study between nebivolol and paroxetine in healthy volunteers.
Achim, M; Bocsan, C; Briciu, C; Buzoianu, A; Gheldiu, AM; Muntean, D; Neag, M; Popa, A; Vlase, L, 2014
)
1.55
"Complete absence of paroxetine-induced ejaculation delay is presumably related to pharmacodynamic factors and perhaps to 5-HT1A receptor gene polymorphism."( Nonresponders to daily paroxetine and another SSRI in men with lifelong premature ejaculation: a pharmacokinetic dose-escalation study for a rare phenomenon.
Janssen, PK; Schweitzer, DH; Touw, D; Waldinger, MD, 2014
)
1.04
"To evaluate the ability of two biomarkers in reflecting venlafaxine pharmacokinetic variations, and to further examine their relationship with venlafaxine treatment outcomes."( The influences of CYP2D6 genotypes and drug interactions on the pharmacokinetics of venlafaxine: exploring predictive biomarkers for treatment outcomes.
Choi, JY; Chung, MW; Ha, JH; Jiang, F; Kim, HD; Kim, YH; Lee, SY; Na, HS; Seo, DW; Shin, HJ, 2015
)
0.42
"Two well-defined influencing factors: CYP2D6 genotypes and drug interactions were enriched into a three-period crossover study to produce venlafaxine pharmacokinetic variations: In each period, healthy CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers (EM group; n = 12) and CYP2D6*10/*10 intermediate metabolizers (IM group; n = 12) were pretreated with clarithromycin (CYP3A4 inhibitor), or nothing (control), or clarithromycin + paroxetine (CYP3A4 + CYP2D6 inhibitors), before administration of a single-dose of 75 mg venlafaxine."( The influences of CYP2D6 genotypes and drug interactions on the pharmacokinetics of venlafaxine: exploring predictive biomarkers for treatment outcomes.
Choi, JY; Chung, MW; Ha, JH; Jiang, F; Kim, HD; Kim, YH; Lee, SY; Na, HS; Seo, DW; Shin, HJ, 2015
)
0.58
" Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis."( Study of pharmacokinetic interaction of paroxetine and roxithromycin on bencycloquidium bromide in healthy subjects.
Agbokponto, JE; Ding, L; Liang, M; Liu, R; Liu, Z; Luo, Z, 2015
)
0.68
" Geometric mean Cmax were 187."( Study of pharmacokinetic interaction of paroxetine and roxithromycin on bencycloquidium bromide in healthy subjects.
Agbokponto, JE; Ding, L; Liang, M; Liu, R; Liu, Z; Luo, Z, 2015
)
0.68
" We compared 168 hours pharmacokinetic profiles of both analytes after a single oral 20 mg dose of ibogaine in 21 healthy subjects who had been pretreated for 6 days with placebo or the CYP2D6 inhibitor paroxetine."( Influence of CYP2D6 activity on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single 20 mg dose of ibogaine in healthy volunteers.
Garbe, K; Glue, P; Hung, CT; Jakobi, H; Lenagh-Glue, Z; Lyudin, A; Winter, H, 2015
)
0.6
" Polysomnography and blood sampling for pharmacokinetic analysis were performed on the pre-dose night and nights 1 and 3 of dosing in each period."( Differentiated effects of the multimodal antidepressant vortioxetine on sleep architecture: Part 1, a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic comparison with paroxetine in healthy men.
Areberg, J; Buchberg, J; Højer, AM; Nutt, DJ; Wilson, S, 2015
)
0.62
" This study examined the influence of the coadministration of paroxetine, a strong selective CYP2D6 inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetic properties of hydrocodone (and hydromorphone) in healthy adults."( Effects of paroxetine, a CYP2D6 inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetic properties of hydrocodone after coadministration with a single-entity, once-daily, extended-release hydrocodone tablet.
Cipriano, A; Friedman, K; Harris, SC; Kapil, RP; Michels, G; Mondal, SA; Shet, M, 2015
)
1.05
"Hydrocodone mean Cmax and t½ and median Tmax values were similar with paroxetine or placebo coadministration (16."( Effects of paroxetine, a CYP2D6 inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetic properties of hydrocodone after coadministration with a single-entity, once-daily, extended-release hydrocodone tablet.
Cipriano, A; Friedman, K; Harris, SC; Kapil, RP; Michels, G; Mondal, SA; Shet, M, 2015
)
1.04
"This study investigated population pharmacokinetics of paroxetine, and then performed an integrated analysis of exposure and clinical outcome using population pharmacokinetic parameter estimates in depressed patients treated with paroxetine."( Exposure-outcome analysis in depressed patients treated with paroxetine using population pharmacokinetics.
Chun, MR; Chung, MW; Kim, DK; Kim, HD; Kim, JR; Lee, SY; Lim, SW; Myung, W; Na, HS; Woo, HI, 2015
)
0.91
" Pharmacokinetic parameters of paroxetine were calculated using non-compartmental analysis with Win-Nonlin software."( Pharmacokinetics and safety of paroxetine controlled-release tablet in healthy Chinese subjects: a single-dose three-period crossover study.
Chen, R; Hu, P; Shen, K, 2016
)
1.01
"The absorption of controlled-release paroxetine was delayed with a median tmax of 8 - 10 hours and the mean t1/2 was 12 - 14 hours across all doses."( Pharmacokinetics and safety of paroxetine controlled-release tablet in healthy Chinese subjects: a single-dose three-period crossover study.
Chen, R; Hu, P; Shen, K, 2016
)
0.99
" In this study, we attempted to evaluate the degree of the impact of different CYP2D6 genotypes on the pharmacokinetic (PK) variability of paroxetine in a Japanese population using a population PK approach."( Influence of the cytochrome P450 2D6 *10/*10 genotype on the pharmacokinetics of paroxetine in Japanese patients with major depressive disorder: a population pharmacokinetic analysis.
Aoki, A; Iwashita, K; Matsuda, K; Nakashima, H; Nishimura, M; Ogusu, N; Oniki, K; Ono, T; Saruwatari, J; Shimoda, K; Tsuchimine, S; Ueda, M; Yasui-Furukori, N, 2016
)
0.86
" In this article, we report the evidence that contributed to the implementation of pharmacokinetic pharmacogenetic guidelines for antidepressants primarily metabolized by CYP2D6 and CYP2C19."( Pharmacokinetic Pharmacogenetic Prescribing Guidelines for Antidepressants: A Template for Psychiatric Precision Medicine.
Black, JL; Elliott, MA; Frye, MA; Nassan, M; Nicholson, WT; Rohrer Vitek, CR, 2016
)
0.43
"In recent years, physiologically based PharmacoKinetic (PBPK) modeling has received growing interest as a useful tool for the assessment of drug pharmacokinetics."( Prediction of drug-drug interactions using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models of CYP450 modulators included in Simcyp software.
Daali, Y; Desmeules, JA; Marsousi, N; Rudaz, S, 2018
)
0.48
"The aim of this work was to predict the extent of Cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6)-mediated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in different CYP2D6 genotypes using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling."( Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling for the Prediction of CYP2D6-Mediated Gene-Drug-Drug Interactions.
Daali, Y; Desmeules, J; Storelli, F, 2019
)
0.51
"A pharmacokinetic modelling approach was applied to examine gestational changes in trough plasma concentrations for CYP 2D6 phenotypes, followed by necessary dose adjustment strategies to maintain paroxetine levels within a therapeutic range of 20-60 ng/ml."( Precision dosing-based optimisation of paroxetine during pregnancy for poor and ultrarapid CYP2D6 metabolisers: a virtual clinical trial pharmacokinetics study.
Almurjan, A; Badhan, RKS; Macfarlane, H, 2020
)
1.02

Compound-Compound Interactions

The role of paroxetine in clinically significant drug-drug interactions has long been suspected, but only isolated cases provide any evidence. The present study tested the effect of different selective 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists (WAY 100635, NAD-299, p-MPPI and LY 426965) in combination with a SSRI.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The observation that the binding of some, but not all, ligands requires reduced sulfhydryl groups, suggests that differential mechanisms and/or different binding domains do exist for agents which interact at the neuronal 5-HT transporter."( Role of essential sulfhydryl groups in drug interactions at the neuronal 5-HT transporter. Differences between amphetamines and 5-HT uptake inhibitors.
Kuhn, DM; Wolf, WA, 1992
)
0.28
" The case report questions the long term use of pain killers combined with psycho-active drugs in chronic non malignant pain, especially if pain is under control."( Nightmares and hallucinations after long-term intake of tramadol combined with antidepressants.
De Laat, M; Devulder, J; Dumoulin, K; Renson, A; Rolly, G, 1996
)
0.29
") was administered in combination with WAY100635 (0."( Effect of a selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor in combination with 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptor antagonists on extracellular 5-HT in rat frontal cortex in vivo.
Gartside, SE; Sharp, T; Umbers, V, 1997
)
0.3
" To minimize the potential for an adverse event, the practitioner must remember the drug-drug interactions, and possible consequences when one of these antidepressants is being prescribed."( Pharmacokinetic drug interactions of new antidepressants: a review of the effects on the metabolism of other drugs.
Richelson, E, 1997
)
0.3
" Here we determined whether the beta-adrenoceptor/5-HT1A receptor ligands (+/-)-pindolol, (-)-tertatolol and (-)-penbutolol, interact with paroxetine in a similar manner."( Effects of (-)-tertatolol, (-)-penbutolol and (+/-)-pindolol in combination with paroxetine on presynaptic 5-HT function: an in vivo microdialysis and electrophysiological study.
Clifford, EM; Cowen, PJ; Gartside, SE; Sharp, T, 1999
)
0.73
" Paroxetine, in combination with WAY 100635, attenuated the hypothermic effects of 8-OH-DPAT as early as 3 days, with a full reversal evident following 7 days, whereas paroxetine, although attenuating the hypothermic effects in OB group by day 7, only reversed it fully after 14 days."( Onset of the effects of the 5-HT1A antagonist, WAY-100635, alone, and in combination with paroxetine, on olfactory bulbectomy and 8-OH-DPAT-induced changes in the rat.
Cryan, JF; Leonard, BE; McGrath, C; Norman, TR, 1999
)
1.43
" The present study tested the effect of different selective 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists (WAY 100635, NAD-299, p-MPPI and LY 426965) in combination with a SSRI (paroxetine), on postsynaptic 5-HT function measured by increased expression of the immediate early gene, Arc."( Effect of different 5-HT1A receptor antagonists in combination with paroxetine on expression of the immediate-early gene Arc in rat brain.
Gray, K; Newson, M; Pei, Q; Sharp, T; Sprakes, M; Tordera, R, 2003
)
0.75
" The role of paroxetine in clinically significant drug-drug interactions, especially involving metabolic inhibitory effects on the substrates of cytochrome p450 2D6, has long been suspected, but only isolated cases provide any evidence."( Pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, and tolerability of paroxetine and paroxetine CR.
DeVane, CL, 2003
)
0.93
" The present findings suggest that NK1 receptor antagonists, when combined with a SSRI, augment 5-HT release by modulating substance P/5-HT interactions in the dorsal raphe nucleus."( Blockade of substance P (neurokinin 1) receptors enhances extracellular serotonin when combined with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor: an in vivo microdialysis study in mice.
De Felipe, C; Froger, N; Gardier, AM; Guiard, BP; Guilloux, JP; Hunt, SP; Lanfumey, L; Przybylski, C; Seif, I, 2004
)
0.32
"Attempts at predicting drug-drug interactions perpetrated by paroxetine from in vitro data have utilized reversible enzyme inhibition models and have been unsuccessful to date, grossly underpredicting interaction magnitude."( In vitro-in vivo extrapolation of CYP2D6 inactivation by paroxetine: prediction of nonstationary pharmacokinetics and drug interaction magnitude.
Obach, RS; Venkatakrishnan, K, 2005
)
0.82
"Patients taking antidepressants are more likely to also be taking multiple medications, increasing the risk of adverse drug-drug interactions (DDIs)."( The potential for clinically significant drug-drug interactions involving the CYP 2D6 system: effects with fluoxetine and paroxetine versus sertraline.
Choi, J; Golbeck, AL; Neff, M; Preskorn, SH; Shah, R, 2007
)
0.55
"To observe the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of Paroxetine combined with electro-acupuncture (EA) in treating depression."( Clinical observation on treatment of depression by electro-acupuncture combined with Paroxetine.
Gong, SH; Liu, JQ; Liu, JS; Liu, S; Shi, ZY; Zhang, GJ, 2007
)
0.81
"Forty-two patients with depression were randomly assigned to the observation group (22 patients) treated with EA combined with Paroxetine, and the control group (20 patients) treated with Paroxetine alone, and the therapeutic course for both groups was 6 weeks."( Clinical observation on treatment of depression by electro-acupuncture combined with Paroxetine.
Gong, SH; Liu, JQ; Liu, JS; Liu, S; Shi, ZY; Zhang, GJ, 2007
)
0.77
"EA combined with Paroxetine has better clinical efficacy than that of Paroxetine alone, with milder adverse reaction and quicker initiation of effect."( Clinical observation on treatment of depression by electro-acupuncture combined with Paroxetine.
Gong, SH; Liu, JQ; Liu, JS; Liu, S; Shi, ZY; Zhang, GJ, 2007
)
0.9
"Flecainide and pharmacologically similar agents that interact with sodium channels may cause delirium in susceptible patients."( Delirium in a patient with toxic flecainide plasma concentrations: the role of a pharmacokinetic drug interaction with paroxetine.
Gugger, JJ; Tsao, YY, 2009
)
0.56
" The CYP2D6 inhibitor paroxetine has previously been shown to interact with metoprolol tartrate."( Influence of metoprolol dosage release formulation on the pharmacokinetic drug interaction with paroxetine.
Bleske, BE; Brook, R; Kerber, K; Nielsen, J; Shea, M; Stout, SM; Welage, LS, 2011
)
0.9
" They were treated by paroxetine combined with CXM or placebo for 8 weeks."( [Clinical observation on treatment of major depressive disorder by paroxetine combined with chaihu xiaoyao mixture].
Long, B; Yi, ZH; Zhu, LP, 2010
)
0.91
"25] for all analytes, indicating a drug-drug interaction."( Randomized open-label drug-drug interaction trial of dextromethorphan/quinidine and paroxetine in healthy volunteers.
Pope, LE; Schoedel, KA; Sellers, EM, 2012
)
0.6
"The hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs) influence the pharmacokinetics of several drug classes and are involved in many clinical drug-drug interactions."( Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
Artursson, P; Haglund, U; Karlgren, M; Kimoto, E; Lai, Y; Norinder, U; Vildhede, A; Wisniewski, JR, 2012
)
0.38
"To observe the clinical efficacy of Yiqiyangxin Chinese medicine compound combined with cognitive therapy on generalized anxiety disorders."( Efficacy of Yiqiyangxin Chinese medicine compound combined with cognitive therapy in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorders.
Ding, JY; Wang, T; Xiao, SR; Xu, GX; Zeng, Y, 2012
)
0.38
"A total of 202 generalized anxiety disorders patients were randomly allocated to a control condition (Paroxetine combined with cognitive therapy) or a treatment condition (Yiqiyangxin Chinese medicine compound combined with cognitive therapy)."( Efficacy of Yiqiyangxin Chinese medicine compound combined with cognitive therapy in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorders.
Ding, JY; Wang, T; Xiao, SR; Xu, GX; Zeng, Y, 2012
)
0.59
"Yiqiyangxin Chinese medicine compound combined with cognitive therapy can significantly reduce the recurrence after medicine withdrawal and is effective on generalized anxiety disorders."( Efficacy of Yiqiyangxin Chinese medicine compound combined with cognitive therapy in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorders.
Ding, JY; Wang, T; Xiao, SR; Xu, GX; Zeng, Y, 2012
)
0.38
"To develop a pharmacokinetic model able to describe the nonlinear pharmacokinetics of paroxetine (PRX) and to predict the drug-drug interaction between PRX and metoprolol under various dosage regimens."( Pharmacokinetic model incorporating mechanism-based inactivation of CYP2D6 can explain both non-linear kinetics and drug interactions of paroxetine.
Hori, S; Mikami, A; Ohtani, H; Sawada, Y, 2013
)
0.82
"The developed model enabled us to quantitatively estimate drug-drug interactions of PRX and CYP2D6 substrate drugs, and to predict optimal dosage regimens."( Pharmacokinetic model incorporating mechanism-based inactivation of CYP2D6 can explain both non-linear kinetics and drug interactions of paroxetine.
Hori, S; Mikami, A; Ohtani, H; Sawada, Y, 2013
)
0.59
" In this 6-week randomized controlled trial with 4-week follow-up, 160 patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) were randomly assigned to paroxetine (PRX) alone (n = 48) or combined with 18 sessions of manual acupuncture (MA, n = 54) or electrical acupuncture (EA, n = 58)."( A 6-week randomized controlled trial with 4-week follow-up of acupuncture combined with paroxetine in patients with major depressive disorder.
Chen, JQ; Guo, SC; Huang, Y; Li, GL; Lin, RY; Pan, JY; Qu, SS; Wang, CQ; Wong, HK; Zhang, YC; Zhang, ZJ; Zhao, CH, 2013
)
0.81
"Given increased knowledge from molecular biology and pharmacology, it is apparent that multiple factors can interact to produce clinically meaningful differences in a drug's effect in specific individuals (i."( Complexities of personalized medicine: how genes, drug-drug interactions, dosing schedules, and other factors can combine to produce clinically meaningful differences in a drug's effect.
Preskorn, SH, 2013
)
0.39
" Subjects received a single 45-mg dacomitinib dose alone and in combination with paroxetine (30 mg/day for 10 consecutive days, with dacomitinib administered on day 4) at steady-state levels."( A phase I open-label study to investigate the potential drug-drug interaction between single-dose dacomitinib and steady-state paroxetine in healthy volunteers.
Bello, CL; Boutros, T; Checchio, TM; Giri, N; Kocinsky, HS; LaBadie, RR; Ni, G; Richie, N; Ruiz-Garcia, A, 2014
)
0.83
" All the pharmacokinetic parameters presented statistically significant differences when paroxetine was administered with nebivolol."( A pharmacokinetic drug interaction study between nebivolol and paroxetine in healthy volunteers.
Achim, M; Bocsan, C; Briciu, C; Buzoianu, A; Gheldiu, AM; Muntean, D; Neag, M; Popa, A; Vlase, L, 2014
)
0.86
"Pharmacogenetics may allow for a personalized treatment, but a combination with clinical variables may further enhance prediction."( Genetic variants in combination with early partial improvement as a clinical utility predictor of treatment outcome in major depressive disorder: the result of two pooled RCTs.
Azuma, J; Kato, M; Kinoshita, T; Nonen, S; Serretti, A; Takekita, Y; Wakeno, M, 2015
)
0.42
"To investigate the clinical value of Paroxetine combined with mid-frequency electrical pulse acupoint stimulation (EPAS) in the treatment of premature ejaculation (PE)."( [Clinical efficacy of Paroxetine combined with mid-frequency electrical pulse acupoint stimulation for premature ejaculation].
Kang, ZP; Li, T; Ouyang, H; Tan, Y; Wang, SH; Wang, WR; Xie, S; Xie, ZP, 2015
)
1
"Totally 69 PE patients were equally assigned to receive oral Paroxetine 20 mg/d, mid-frequency EPAS, or oral Paroxetine 10 mg/d combined with mid-frequency EPAS (P + EPAS) , all for 8 weeks."( [Clinical efficacy of Paroxetine combined with mid-frequency electrical pulse acupoint stimulation for premature ejaculation].
Kang, ZP; Li, T; Ouyang, H; Tan, Y; Wang, SH; Wang, WR; Xie, S; Xie, ZP, 2015
)
0.97
"Oral Paroxetine combined with mid-frequency EPAS has a higher safety and efficacy than either Paroxetine or EPAS alone in the treatment of PE."( [Clinical efficacy of Paroxetine combined with mid-frequency electrical pulse acupoint stimulation for premature ejaculation].
Kang, ZP; Li, T; Ouyang, H; Tan, Y; Wang, SH; Wang, WR; Xie, S; Xie, ZP, 2015
)
1.25
" The aim of this study was to determine whether the zolpidem combined with paroxetine would be effective in the treatment of patients with primary insomnia."( Effect and safety of paroxetine combined with zolpidem in treatment of primary insomnia.
Liu, Y; Mao, HJ; Song, MF; Tang, GZ; Wang, SD; Xu, XH; Yin, Y; Yu, ZH, 2017
)
1
"Ninety patients meeting DSM-IV criteria for primary insomnia were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of treatment with zolpidem combined with paroxetine (the combined treatment group, n = 45) or zolpidem combined with placebo (the control group, n = 45)."( Effect and safety of paroxetine combined with zolpidem in treatment of primary insomnia.
Liu, Y; Mao, HJ; Song, MF; Tang, GZ; Wang, SD; Xu, XH; Yin, Y; Yu, ZH, 2017
)
0.98
"Eight weeks of the zolpidem combined with paroxetine treatment to patients with primary insomnia is more effective than zolpidem treatment only in sleep maintenance and early morning awakenings."( Effect and safety of paroxetine combined with zolpidem in treatment of primary insomnia.
Liu, Y; Mao, HJ; Song, MF; Tang, GZ; Wang, SD; Xu, XH; Yin, Y; Yu, ZH, 2017
)
1.04
" This leads to CYP2D6-mediated drug-drug interactions (DDI)."( The burden and management of cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6)-mediated drug-drug interaction (DDI): co-medication of metoprolol and paroxetine or fluoxetine in the elderly.
Bahar, MA; Borgsteede, SD; Bos, JHJ; Hak, E; Wilffert, B, 2017
)
0.66
" This paper examined the effectiveness of rTMS on first episode depressed patients when combined with antidepressant drugs."( Randomized controlled trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with paroxetine for the treatment of patients with first-episode major depressive disorder.
Chen, WH; Li, N; Li, SX; Lu, L; Shi, L; Song, M; Wang, XY; Wang, YM; Yang, LL, 2017
)
0.68
" The magnitude of drug-drug interaction between dextromethorphan and paroxetine was higher in homozygous than in heterozygous subjects (14."( Impact of CYP2D6 Functional Allelic Variations on Phenoconversion and Drug-Drug Interactions.
Daali, Y; Desmeules, J; Lenglet, S; Matthey, A; Storelli, F; Thomas, A, 2018
)
0.72
" It has been demonstrated to be informative and helpful to quantify the modification in drug exposure due to specific physio-pathological conditions, age, genetic polymorphisms, ethnicity and particularly drug-drug interactions (DDIs)."( Prediction of drug-drug interactions using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models of CYP450 modulators included in Simcyp software.
Daali, Y; Desmeules, JA; Marsousi, N; Rudaz, S, 2018
)
0.48
"Metoprolol (a CYP2D6 substrate) is often co-prescribed with paroxetine/fluoxetine (a CYP2D6 inhibitor) because the clinical relevance of this drug-drug interaction (DDI) is still unclear."( The impact of CYP2D6 mediated drug-drug interaction: a systematic review on a combination of metoprolol and paroxetine/fluoxetine.
Bahar, MA; Borgsteede, SD; Hak, E; Kamp, J; Wilffert, B, 2018
)
0.94
"The aim of this work was to predict the extent of Cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6)-mediated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in different CYP2D6 genotypes using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling."( Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling for the Prediction of CYP2D6-Mediated Gene-Drug-Drug Interactions.
Daali, Y; Desmeules, J; Storelli, F, 2019
)
0.51
" Preliminary studies have shown that traditional chinese medicine prescriptions combined with paroxetine is effective in treating postpartum depression."( Paroxetine combined with traditional chinese medicine prescriptions in the treatment of postpartum depression: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Gong, A; Wu, Z; Zeng, M, 2022
)
2.38
"The meta analysis results show that paroxetine combined with traditional chinese medicine prescriptions can reduce the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) score [WMD = -7."( Paroxetine combined with traditional chinese medicine prescriptions in the treatment of postpartum depression: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Gong, A; Wu, Z; Zeng, M, 2022
)
2.44
"In this preliminary study involving healthy participants, paroxetine combined with oxycodone, compared with oxycodone alone, significantly decreased the ventilatory response to hypercapnia on days 1 and 5, whereas quetiapine combined with oxycodone did not cause such an effect."( Effect of Paroxetine or Quetiapine Combined With Oxycodone vs Oxycodone Alone on Ventilation During Hypercapnia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Boughner, R; Burkhart, K; Dahan, A; Davis, MC; Florian, J; Ford, K; Gershuny, V; Han, X; Ismaiel, OA; Matta, M; Patel, V; Prentice, K; Racz, R; Rouse, R; Sanabria, C; Shah, A; Stone, M; Strauss, DG; van der Schrier, R; Wang, C; Weaver, J, 2022
)
1.37

Bioavailability

Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and is used for the treatment of depression and anxiety problems. It suffers from the drawback of poor oral bioavailability (less than 50%) due to its extensive first pass metabolism.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" They are well absorbed orally but exhibit an extensive first-pass extraction in the liver."( Pharmacokinetics of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
DeVane, CL, 1992
)
0.28
" Paroxetine is well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and undergoes first-pass metabolism that is partially saturable."( The pharmacologic profile of paroxetine, a new selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.
Johnson, AM; Tulloch, IF, 1992
)
1.49
"Paroxetine is well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, and appears to undergo first-pass metabolism which is partially saturable."( A review of the metabolism and pharmacokinetics of paroxetine in man.
Greb, WH; Haddock, RE; Kaye, CM; Langley, PF; Mellows, G; Tasker, TC; Zussman, BD, 1989
)
1.97
" Paroxetine is applied orally at single daily doses of 20 to 50 mg and well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract."( [Paroxetine: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics].
Hiemke, C, 1994
)
2.11
" Its bioavailability is not affected by food or antacids; its mean half-life of about 24 hours is consistent with once-a-day dosing; also, it has no pharmacologically active metabolites."( Paroxetine: an overview of the efficacy and safety of a new selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor in the treatment of depression.
Nemeroff, CB, 1993
)
1.73
"The quantitative structure-bioavailability relationship of 232 structurally diverse drugs was studied to evaluate the feasibility of constructing a predictive model for the human oral bioavailability of prospective new medicinal agents."( QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
Topliss, JG; Yoshida, F, 2000
)
0.31
" Paroxetine is well absorbed orally and undergoes extensive first pass metabolism that is partially saturable."( Paroxetine: a review.
Bourin, M; Chue, P; Guillon, Y, 2001
)
2.66
" After a sudden recurrence of seizures when generic valproic acid was substituted for the brand-name product, an investigation by the US Food and Drug Administration found a difference in bioavailability between the 2 formulations."( The bioequivalence and therapeutic efficacy of generic versus brand-name psychoactive drugs.
Borgheini, G, 2003
)
0.32
" Paroxetine CR delays the onset and controls the rate of absorption of medication."( Efficacy and tolerability of controlled-release paroxetine.
Golden, RN, 2003
)
1.48
" The present study demonstrated that the bioavailability of paroxetine was increased by itraconazole, suggesting a possible involvement of P-glycoprotein in the pharmacokinetics of paroxetine."( Effect of itraconazole on pharmacokinetics of paroxetine: the role of gut transporters.
Inoue, Y; Kaneko, S; Niioka, T; Saito, M; Sato, Y; Yasui-Furukori, N, 2007
)
0.84
" Moreover, because endogenous gonadal hormones modulate both BDNF expression and serotonin biosynthesis and bioavailability and regulate brain functions like affective and cognitive functions, we proposed to evaluate the effects of a treatment with paroxetine, an SSRI, in a group of postmenopausal women and to clarify the possible relationship between paroxetine, plasma BDNF levels, and climacteric symptoms."( Paroxetine increases brain-derived neurotrophic factor in postmenopausal women.
Bucci, F; Casarosa, E; Cubeddu, A; Genazzani, AR; Giannini, A; Luisi, M; Luisi, S; Merlini, S; Pluchino, N, 2010
)
1.98
"The oral bioavailability of some drugs is markedly lower in cynomolgus monkeys than in humans."( Species differences in intestinal metabolic activities of cytochrome P450 isoforms between cynomolgus monkeys and humans.
Komuro, S; Mizuki, Y; Nishimuta, H; Sato, K; Yabuki, M, 2011
)
0.37
"6 h) and a low bioavailability (31±15%)."( Pharmacokinetics of paroxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, in Grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus erithacus): influence of pharmaceutical formulation and length of dosing.
Fink-Gremmels, J; Haritova, A; Lumeij, JT; Schoemaker, NJ; Smit, JW; van Maarseveen, EM; van Zeeland, YR, 2013
)
0.71
" After that the selected formula of PAX liposomal gel transdermal patch was applied to rabbits for in vivo bioavailability study in comparison with oral administration of the marketed PAX tablet."( Transdermal drug delivery of paroxetine through lipid-vesicular formulation to augment its bioavailability.
Abary, MY; Bendas, ER; El Rehem, RT; El-Nabarawi, MA, 2013
)
0.68
"The relative contribution of hepatic compared with intestinal oxidative metabolism is a crucial factor in drug oral bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy."( Application of a novel regulatable Cre recombinase system to define the role of liver and gut metabolism in drug oral bioavailability.
Gilbert, I; Henderson, CJ; McLaren, AW; McLaughlin, LA; Osuna-Cabello, M; Taylor, M; Wolf, CR, 2015
)
0.42
" In contrast MAOi antidepressants, that also increase extracellular serotonin bioavailability have little or no effects on this condition."( Differential modulation of Nav1.7 and Nav1.8 channels by antidepressant drugs.
Beaulieu, JM; Chahine, M; Poulin, H; Thériault, O, 2015
)
0.42
"Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and is used for the treatment of depression and anxiety problems, but suffers from the drawback of poor oral bioavailability (less than 50%) due to its extensive first pass metabolism."( Intranasal delivery of paroxetine nanoemulsion via the olfactory region for the management of depression: formulation, behavioural and biochemical estimation.
Ali, J; Baboota, S; Gupta, BK; Kumar, S; Pandey, YR, 2016
)
2.19
" Also, many of the P2R ligands still lack bioavailability due to charged groups or hydrolytic (either enzymatic or chemical) instability."( Medicinal chemistry of adenosine, P2Y and P2X receptors.
Jacobson, KA; Müller, CE, 2016
)
0.43
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51
" An orally bioavailable GRK2 inhibitor could offer unique therapeutic outcomes that cannot be attained by current heart failure treatments that directly target GPCRs or angiotensin-converting enzyme."( Hit-to-lead optimization and discovery of a potent, and orally bioavailable G protein coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) inhibitor.
DesJarlais, RL; Gaul, MD; Hermans, A; Huang, DZ; Krosky, D; Liu, Z; Lu, HR; Milligan, CM; Petrounia, I; Qi, J; Spurlino, JC; Wang, W; Xu, G; Xu, JZ, 2020
)
0.56

Dosage Studied

This paper evaluates the pharmacokinetic properties and potential side effects of single and repeated dosing of paroxetine in Grey parrots. Women exposed to >25 mg/day of parxetine during the first trimester of pregnancy were at increased risk of having an infant with major congenital malformations.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" Following reduction of neuroleptic dosage and addition of paroxetine he developed severe extra-pyramidal side effects."( Extra pyramidal side effects associated with paroxetine.
Nicholson, SD, 1992
)
0.79
" A comprehensive review of data on dosage supports the recommendation that 20 mg paroxetine daily is the optimal therapeutic dose for most patients."( Paroxetine: an overview of dosage, tolerability, and safety.
Jenner, PN, 1992
)
1.95
"The pharmacology and pharmacokinetics, adverse effects, drug interactions, efficacy, and dosage and administration of the new selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors paroxetine, sertraline, and fluvoxamine are reviewed."( Paroxetine, sertraline, and fluvoxamine: new selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
Grimsley, SR; Jann, MW, 1992
)
1.92
" In dose-response studies (0-200 mg/kg), 50 mg/kg was the threshold dose for Bmax effects and 200 mg/kg was lethal."( Plasticity and ontogeny of the central 5-HT transporter: effect of neonatal 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine lesions in the rat.
Martens, JM; Pranzatelli, MR, 1992
)
0.28
" Paroxetine was significantly superior to placebo in the treatment of melancholia and a clear dose-response relationship was established."( Paroxetine in the treatment of melancholia and severe depression.
Dunbar, GC; Stoker, MJ; Tignol, J, 1992
)
2.64
"The dose regimen for paroxetine in the treatment of depression has been well established through a number of individual dosing studies and analyses from the worldwide clinical data base."( Optimal dose regimen for paroxetine.
Dunbar, GC; Dunner, DL, 1992
)
0.91
" The nausea rarely leads to drug discontinuation or even dosage reduction."( An overview of paroxetine.
Boyer, WF; Feighner, JP, 1992
)
0.64
" Plasma concentrations of paroxetine at steady state (8-147 ng/ml) were in the normal range for a 30-mg daily dosing regimen."( No influence of the antidepressant paroxetine on carbamazepine, valproate and phenytoin.
Andersen, BB; Dam, M; Kristensen, HB; Lund, J; Mengel, H; Mikkelsen, M; Pedersen, B; Vesterager, A,
)
0.71
" The primary adverse events associated with serotonin reuptake inhibitors involve the gastrointestinal system, although side effects may be less frequent at lower dosage levels."( Clinical overview of serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
Rickels, K; Schweizer, E, 1990
)
0.28
"The possible neurotoxic effects of the alpha-ethyl homologue of MDMA, N-methyl-1-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-2-butanamine (MBDB), were examined following a regimen of twice daily dosing for four days."( Neurotoxic effects of the alpha-ethyl homologue of MDMA following subacute administration.
Johnson, MP; Nichols, DE, 1989
)
0.28
" Elimination half-lives also showed variability between these elderly patients, but tended to be longer after cessation of multiple dosing than after a single dose."( Paroxetine: pharmacokinetic and antidepressant effect in the elderly.
Fjord-Larsen, T; Lundmark, J; Manniche, PM; Mengel, H; Møller-Nielsen, EM; Pauser, H; Scheel Thomsen, I; Wålinder, J, 1989
)
1.72
" This selectivity for 5-HT uptake was maintained after oral dosing for 14 days."( Biochemical effects of the antidepressant paroxetine, a specific 5-hydroxytryptamine uptake inhibitor.
Johnson, AM; Nelson, DR; Thomas, DR, 1987
)
0.54
" Each drug was administered for 6 weeks after a 1 week run-in period at a daily dosage of 30 mg for paroxetine or 60 mg for mianserin."( Paroxetine in the treatment of depression. A double-blind multicenter study versus mianserin.
Mertens, C; Pintens, H, 1988
)
1.93
"The effect of single and repeated dosing of paroxetine on the in vivo noradrenaline uptake process, as determined by tyramine pressor response tests, was evaluated in normal healthy subjects."( A comparison of the effect of paroxetine and amitriptyline on the tyramine pressor response test.
Hassan, SM; Turner, P; Wainscott, G, 1985
)
0.82
") both reversed the inhibitory effect of paroxetine and, when used as a pretreatment, caused a pronounced shift to the right of the paroxetine dose-response curve."( Interaction between a selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist and an SSRI in vivo: effects on 5-HT cell firing and extracellular 5-HT.
Gartside, SE; Hajós, M; Sharp, T; Umbers, V, 1995
)
0.56
" At t1/2 of 24 h makes once-daily dosing feasible and allows for new steady-state concentrations and wash-out within a reasonable time after dose adjustment."( Targeted pharmacotherapy in depression management: comparative pharmacokinetics of fluoxetine, paroxetine and sertraline.
Preskorn, S, 1994
)
0.51
" Two weeks following this dosage regimen, shown to markedly reduce 5-hydroxytryptamine terminals, both glucocorticoid receptor and mineralocorticoid receptor messenger RNA expression were significantly decreased (30-47% fall) in the granule cells of the dentate gyrus and pyramidal cells of CA1-CA4 fields of Ammon's horn, but not in parietal cortex neurons."( Chronic 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine administration decreases glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptor, but increases 5-hydroxytryptamine1C receptor gene expression in the rat hippocampus.
Kelly, PA; Seckl, JR; Sharkey, J; Yau, JL, 1994
)
0.29
" In keeping with previous data obtained with other sigma receptor ligands, low doses of sertraline and of clorgyline potentiated selectively with a bell-shaped dose-response curve the effect of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) on pyramidal neurons in the CA3 region of the rat dorsal hippocampus."( Modification of the N-methyl-D-aspartate response by antidepressant sigma receptor ligands.
Bergeron, R; De Montigny, C; Debonnel, G, 1993
)
0.29
"To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical investigations, adverse effects, and dosing strategies of paroxetine as a treatment of major depression."( Paroxetine: a selective serotonin reuptake inhibiting antidepressant.
Caley, CF; Weber, SS, 1993
)
1.94
" Our results suggest that brofaromine at the clinically used dosage of 150 mg/day does indeed inhibit 5-HT uptake, as evidenced by measurements of 3H-paroxetine binding to platelets."( Serotonin uptake inhibition by the monoamine oxidase inhibitor brofaromine.
Feldtrauer, JJ; Germer, M; Graf, T; Howald, H; Waldmeier, PC, 1993
)
0.49
"With some limitations in interpreting the data, the findings of this study suggest that SSRI-associated female sexual dysfunction occurs at a higher rate than we previously thought, equal potentials in implicating female sexual side effects among three SSRIs, and the absence or the low incidence of female sexual adverse effects from bupropion, and that these side effects can be managed by waiting for a spontaneous remission, dosage reduction of SSRIs, substitution with bupropion and other antidepressants, or the use of an antidote."( Female sexual side effects associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: a descriptive clinical study of 33 patients.
Hsu, JH; Shen, WW, 1995
)
0.29
" They were prescribed the drug for a minimum of 10 weeks, and the maximum dosage was 40 mg/day."( Adverse events after the abrupt discontinuation of paroxetine.
Dominguez, RA; Goodnick, PJ,
)
0.38
" At the mean dosage of 47."( Paroxetine in the treatment of generalized social phobia: open-label treatment and double-blind placebo-controlled discontinuation.
Chale, RA; Chartier, MJ; Coté, D; Hazen, AL; Kroft, CD; Stein, MB; Walker, JR, 1996
)
1.74
" The dosage was designed as a fixed-adjustable regimen for an active treatment period of six weeks."( Paroxetine in the treatment of Chinese patients with depressive episode: a double-blind randomized comparison with imipramine.
Chan, CH; Chiu, HJ; Hong, CJ, 1996
)
1.74
" Indeed, planned pharmacokinetic drug interactions at the level of P450s have been proposed to reduce cyclosporine dosage requirements, to reduce variability of TCA levels, and to manipulate the contribution of alternative metabolic pathways to minimize toxic effects."( Cytochrome P450 enzymes: interpretation of their interactions with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Part II.
Harvey, AT; Preskorn, SH, 1996
)
0.29
" Neither d-fenfluramine, paroxetine, or ipsapirone following acute dosage had a statistically significant effect on nocturnal melatonin synthesis."( Nocturnal plasma melatonin concentrations in healthy volunteers: effect of single doses of d-fenfluramine, paroxetine, and ipsapirone.
Burrows, GD; Nathan, PJ; Norman, TR, 1996
)
0.81
" After 5 days of therapy the patient reported no adverse effects, and the paroxetine dosage was increased to 20 mg every morning."( Possible paroxetine-induced bruxism.
Adler, DA; Bungay, KM; Romanelli, F, 1996
)
0.94
"Eighty patients aged between 20-65 years and suffering from bipolar disease according to DSM IV criteria, were treated with paroxetine for os at the single dosage of 20-40 mg/die."( [Efficacy and tolerability of paroxetine in the treatment of the depressive phase of bipolar disorders].
Ambrosio, LA; Barrese, E; Buccomino, D; Filippo, A; Marchese, G; Morelli, A; Musacchio, R; Pupo, F; Romano, FE, 1996
)
0.79
" We discuss a possible relation between serotonin syndrome and a highly dosed combination therapy with moclobemide."( [Depressive stupor--malignant neuroleptic syndrome--serotonin syndrome. A case contribution to a difficult differential diagnosis].
König, F; Löble, M; Wolfersdorf, M, 1996
)
0.29
" The dose-response curve was biphasic for citalopram with a maximum of 64% inhibition."( Behavioral profiles of SSRIs in animal models of depression, anxiety and aggression. Are they all alike?
Meier, E; Sánchez, C, 1997
)
0.3
" 15 HIV-infected subjects (10 patients with a major depressive episode and 5 patients with an adjustment disorder with depressed mood, according to the DSM IV diagnostic criteria) were administered paroxetine at a daily dosage of 20 mg."( Efficacy of paroxetine for the treatment of depression in the context of HIV infection.
Gambini, O; Garghentini, G; Grassi, B; Lazzarin, A; Scarone, S, 1997
)
0.86
"Sixty patients were randomly assigned to receive dosage titrated upward to between 50-150 mg/day of fluvoxamine (N = 30) or 20-50 mg/day of paroxetine (N = 30)."( A double-blind comparison of fluvoxamine and paroxetine in the treatment of depressed outpatients.
Feiger, A; Kiev, A, 1997
)
0.76
"63 mmol/l, and 693 ng/ml, respectively; the latter was six times higher than the upper concentrations seen in patients on this dosage of the drug."( Serotonin syndrome after lithium add-on medication to paroxetine.
Bagli, M; Laux, G; Rao, ML; Sobanski, T, 1997
)
0.55
" Dosage was flexible (5-30 mg/day); also, the patients were free to chose between continuous medication and medication in the luteal phase only."( A naturalistic study of paroxetine in premenstrual syndrome: efficacy and side-effects during ten cycles of treatment.
Andersch, B; Eriksson, E; Sundblad, C; Wikander, I, 1997
)
0.6
" On the final day of coadministration, the rate-corrected QT interval (QTc) was unaltered compared with terfenadine dosed alone; maximum QTc values (mean [SEM]) were 404 (4) and 405 (5) msec, respectively."( Paroxetine does not affect the cardiac safety and pharmacokinetics of terfenadine in healthy adult men.
Benincosa, LJ; Etheredge, RC; Everitt, DE; Jorkasky, DK; Martin, DE; Zussman, BD, 1997
)
1.74
" On re-exposition with a lower clozapine dosage the increase was significantly lower."( Dose-dependent pharmacokinetic interaction of clozapine and paroxetine in an extensive metabolizer.
Ewald, R; Frank, UG; Joos, AA; Kaschka, WP; König, F; Mörike, KE, 1997
)
0.54
" Thus, in all patients, fluvoxamine induced relevant increases in serum concentrations of clozapine and its metabolites, probably by the inhibition of enzymes catalyzing the degradation of clozapine and N-desmethylclozapine, whereas paroxetine, at a usual clinically effective dosage of 20 mg/day, did not cause significant pharmacokinetic interactions."( Pharmacokinetic interactions of clozapine with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: differential effects of fluvoxamine and paroxetine in a prospective study.
Anghelescu, I; Härter, S; Hiemke, C; Szegedi, A; Weigmann, H; Wetzel, H; Wiesner, J, 1998
)
0.69
") After initiating morphine or making any change of dose or route of administration, the dosage should be evaluated after approximately 24 hours."( The management of chronic pain in patients with breast cancer. The Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Canadian Society of Palliative Care Physicians. Canadian Association of Radiation Oncologist
, 1998
)
0.3
"), shifted the dose-response relationships to the right for each of the antidepressant agents (dothiepin, amitriptyline, sibutramine, (+)-oxaprotiline and paroxetine)."( The involvement of the opioidergic system in the antinociceptive mechanism of action of antidepressant compounds.
Gray, AM; Sewell, RD; Spencer, PS, 1998
)
0.5
" The initial daily dosage of paroxetine (or placebo) was 20 mg with increases of 10 mg/d weekly (flexible dosing to a maximum of 50 mg/d) permitted after the second week of treatment."( Paroxetine treatment of generalized social phobia (social anxiety disorder): a randomized controlled trial.
Bushnell, W; Gergel, I; Liebowitz, MR; Lydiard, RB; Pitts, CD; Stein, MB, 1998
)
2.03
" The purpose of this study was to assess whether there was a difference in expenditures during the first 90 days of SSRI therapy with paroxetine or sertraline versus fluoxetine in patients who were also receiving a stable dosage of a nonpsychiatric drug also metabolized by the CYP-450 2D6 or 3A4 isoenzyme systems."( Economic consequences of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use with drugs also metabolized by the cytochrome P-450 system.
Croghan, TW; Crown, WH; Hylan, TR; Melfi, CA; Meneades, LM; Ozminkowski, RJ; Robinson, RL,
)
0.33
" Cost, number of prescriptions, and dosage strength data is also presented."( Trends in the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in nine Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient facilities.
Voris, JC, 1999
)
0.3
" An antidepressant drug utilization review study performed in two different HMO models revealed important variations among available SSRI therapies in terms of dosage escalation and discontinuation, as well as concomitant medication costs associated with treating side effects."( Antidepressant utilization in managed care: an evaluation of SSRI use in two HMO settings.
Navarro, R; Spangler, M; Valler, WE, 1995
)
0.29
" While one group of investigators suggested that the overall cost of administering paroxetine may also be less than that for fluoxetine and sertraline when drug costs and labour costs associated with dosage adjustment are taken into account, more data are required before conclusions on the relative pharmacoeconomic merits of SSRIs can be made."( Paroxetine. A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its use in depression.
Whittington, R; Wilde, MI, 1995
)
1.96
" Efficacy was assessed weekly with the 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI), and safety was assessed with the Dosage Record and Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale."( Paroxetine and amitriptyline augmentation of lithium in the treatment of major depression: a double-blind study.
Bauer, M; Meister, W; Müller-Oerlinghausen, B; Zaninelli, R, 1999
)
1.75
" From week 7-12, dosing could be adjusted biweekly, as required (paroxetine 20-50 mg/day, and fluoxetine 20-80 mg/day)."( A Canadian multicenter, double-blind study of paroxetine and fluoxetine in major depressive disorder.
Bakish, D; Beauclair, L; Bélanger, MC; Chouinard, G; Manchanda, R; Morris, P; O'Neill, MC; Ravindran, A; Reesal, R; Remick, R; Saxena, B; Vasavan Nair, NP, 1999
)
0.8
" When the dosage was diminished very gradually the symptoms were mild."( [Severe withdrawal symptoms with fever during paroxetine tapering off].
Peeters, FP; Zandbergen, J, 1999
)
0.56
" Paroxetine did not have to be discontinued in any of the patients because of side effects; the most serious side effects included hyperactivity/behavioral activation in 3 younger patients (< 10 years) necessitating dosage reduction but not discontinuation."( Paroxetine open-label treatment of pediatric outpatients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Carroll, E; Fitzgerald, KD; Rosenberg, DR; Stewart, CM; Tawile, V, 1999
)
2.66
" In each session, dose-response curves to both locally infused noradrenaline acid tartrate (0."( Comparison of the effects of venlafaxine, desipramine, and paroxetine on noradrenaline- and methoxamine-evoked constriction of the dorsal hand vein.
Abdelmawla, AH; Bradshaw, CM; Langley, RW; Szabadi, E, 1999
)
0.55
" Five-day repeat dosing of a typical SSRI, paroxetine, increased climbing, a distinctive antidepressive behavior, 1 h after but not 1 h before treatment."( Effects of repeated selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine treatments on mouse forced swimming.
Akagawa, Y; Hishikawa, Y; Maruyama, A; Masuda, Y; Shimizu, T, 1999
)
0.81
" However, there is no data on the dosage of selective serotonin uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) required to maintain symptom resolution in women treated for major depression during pregnancy."( Dose of selective serotonin uptake inhibitors across pregnancy: clinical implications.
Hostetter, A; Llewellyn, A; McLaughlin, E; Stowe, ZN; Strader, JR, 2000
)
0.31
" Thirty-three subjects with DSM-IV panic disorder, with or without agoraphobia, were randomized to receive either paroxetine or a placebo with flexible dosing (10-50 mg/day)."( Do selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors enhance the efficacy of very brief cognitive behavioral therapy for panic disorder? A pilot study.
Chartier, MJ; Graham, R; Ron Norton, G; Stein, MB; Walker, JR, 2000
)
0.52
") using the same dosing regimen as described above."( Sibutramine does not decrease the number of 5-HT re-uptake sites in rat brain and, like fluoxetine, protects against the deficits produced by dexfenfluramine.
Cheetham, SC; Heal, DJ; Slater, NA; Viggers, JA, 2000
)
0.31
"Fifty-seven highly recurrent unipolar patients, excluded from previous long-term studies with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) after they experienced a new recurrence, were acutely treated with the full dosage of the SSRIs they were on."( Will a second prophylactic treatment with a higher dosage of the same antidepressant either prevent or delay new depressive episodes?
Bongiorno, F; Franchini, L; Rossini, D; Smeraldi, E; Spagnolo, C; Zanardi, R, 2000
)
0.31
" In vivo platelet activation, secretion, and dose-response aggregation of the controls and patients was measured after overnight bedrest under basal conditions, and after a mild exercise challenge."( Platelet reactivity in depressed patients treated with paroxetine: preliminary findings.
Baron, A; Hanson, SR; Knight, BT; Manatunga, A; Marzec, UM; Musselman, DL; Nemeroff, CB; Penna, S; Reemsnyder, A, 2000
)
0.55
" It is also suggested that positron emission tomography may be used to define therapeutic dosing early on in the process of clinical evaluation of new treatment strategies."( Pindolol augmentation of antidepressant treatment: recent contributions from brain imaging studies.
Broft, A; Laruelle, M; Martinez, D, 2000
)
0.31
" The maternal fixed dosage of paroxetine was 10, 20, or 40 mg/day for a minimum of 30 days before the samples were drawn."( Paroxetine levels in postpartum depressed women, breast milk, and infant serum.
Kim, J; Kostaras, X; Misri, S; Riggs, KW, 2000
)
2.04
" Tremor activity was assessed weekly, quantitatively by accelerometry and qualitatively with the Dosage Record and Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale."( Changes in quantitatively assessed tremor during treatment of major depression with lithium augmented by paroxetine or amitriptyline.
Bauer, M; Jobert, M; Müller-Oerlinghausen, B; Zaninelli, R, 2001
)
0.52
" The risk appears to be greater with higher dosage therapy."( Retinopathy associated with high-dose interferon alfa-2b therapy.
Aaberg, TM; Greiner, K; Hejny, C; Lawson, DH; Sternberg, P, 2001
)
0.31
" To determine whether selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) induced hypomania is secondary to medication effects, we examined the dose-response relationship of SSRI-induced hypomania in two patients with depressive disorder."( Dose-response relationship of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors treatment-emergent hypomania in depressive disorders.
Ramasubbu, R, 2001
)
0.31
"Paroxetine, with a daily dosage from 20 to 40 mg, is an effective tool in normalizing the metabolic status of CYP2D6 ultrarapid metabolizers."( Inhibition of cytochrome P4502D6 activity with paroxetine normalizes the ultrarapid metabolizer phenotype as measured by nortriptyline pharmacokinetics and the debrisoquin test.
Andersson, K; Bertilsson, L; Härtter, S; Laine, K; Svensson, JO; Tybring, G; Widén, J, 2001
)
2.01
"Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are commonly used to treat major depression; however, the percentage of serotonin (5-HT) transporter (5-HTT) sites occupied during clinical dosing is unknown."( Occupancy of serotonin transporters by paroxetine and citalopram during treatment of depression: a [(11)C]DASB PET imaging study.
Ginovart, N; Goulding, V; Hood, K; Houle, S; Hussey, D; Meyer, JH; Wilson, AA, 2001
)
0.58
" Paroxetine (n = 6) or placebo (n = 9) was given in a double-blind format for 8 weeks using a flexible dosing schedule."( Paroxetine for social anxiety and alcohol use in dual-diagnosed patients.
Brady, KT; Davidson, JR; Johnson, MR; Randall, CL; Sonne, SC; Thevos, AK; Thomas, SE; Willard, SL, 2001
)
2.66
" Thirty men with an intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) less than 1 minute were randomly assigned to receive paroxetine (20 mg/day) and citalopram (20 mg/day) for 5 weeks, after taking half the dosage in the first week."( SSRIs and ejaculation: a double-blind, randomized, fixed-dose study with paroxetine and citalopram.
Olivier, B; Waldinger, MD; Zwinderman, AH, 2001
)
0.75
" Secondary criteria confirmed the antidepressant efficacy of both medications, with no difference between tianeptine and paroxetine (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale global score at endpoint, Clinical Global Impression final scores, number of responders, delay-to-response, rate of dosage doubling at day 21)."( Efficacy and safety of tianeptine in major depression: evidence from a 3-month controlled clinical trial versus paroxetine.
Azoulay, P; Septien, L; Waintraub, L, 2002
)
0.73
" Further data analyses are needed to determine whether more specific guidelines for paroxetine dosage escalation in social anxiety disorder can be drawn."( A randomized, double-blind, fixed-dose comparison of paroxetine and placebo in the treatment of generalized social anxiety disorder.
Carpenter, D; Liebowitz, MR; Oakes, R; Pitts, CD; Stein, MB; Tancer, M, 2002
)
0.79
" However, the time course for maximum inhibition to occur or for inhibition to dissipate when dosing is discontinued, requires clarification."( Differential time course of cytochrome P450 2D6 enzyme inhibition by fluoxetine, sertraline, and paroxetine in healthy volunteers.
Boulton, DW; DeVane, CL; Goldman, J; Liston, HL; Markowitz, JS; Risch, SC, 2002
)
0.53
" This raises the important question of whether once-weekly enteric-coated fluoxetine, 90 mg, is effective for maintenance of response in patients whose depressive symptoms have responded to daily dosing with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) such as citalopram, paroxetine, or sertraline."( Switching patients from daily citalopram, paroxetine, or sertraline to once-weekly fluoxetine in the maintenance of response for depression.
Brown, EB; Gonzales, JS; Miner, CM; Munir, R, 2002
)
0.76
" In addition, the different dose-response to fluvoxamine suggests that 5-HT(1B) knockout mice have possible adaptations of 5-HT transporters in order to compensate for the loss of the terminal 5-HT(1B) autoreceptor."( The effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on extracellular 5-HT levels in the hippocampus of 5-HT(1B) receptor knockout mice.
De Groote, L; Olivier, B; Westenberg, HG, 2002
)
0.31
"For paroxetine and fluoxetine, plasma concentrations and dosage strongly influence the magnitude of enzyme inhibition."( CYP2D6 inhibition by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: analysis of achievable steady-state plasma concentrations and the effect of ultrarapid metabolism at CYP2D6.
Alfaro, CL; Ereshefsky, L; Gaedigk, A; Lam, YW; Simpson, J, 2002
)
0.87
" To ameliorate or avoid the associated symptoms, client education is recommended, and dosage tapering is encouraged whenever possible."( Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Discontinuation syndrome.
Finfgeld, DL, 2002
)
0.31
"To investigate a dose-response relationship for paroxetine administration, and to determine whether a lower dose of paroxetine is sufficient to increase plasma ACTH and cortisol."( Paroxetine as a 5-HT neuroendocrine probe.
Inoue, N; Iwakawa, M; Kojima, H; Nakamura, J; Shiraishi, Y; Soeda, S; Son, Y; Soya, A; Terao, T; Ueda, N; Yoshimura, R, 2003
)
2.02
"A self-control and follow-up study on subclinical dosage of antidepressants therapy (fluoxetine 10 mg/d, paroxetine 10 mg/d or doxepin 45 mg/d) for 9-12 wks in 46 patients with refractory IBS symptoms according to Rome II criteria was performed, the clinical outcomes were evaluated by scales changes of symptom-related-anxiety, severity index of symptom, and quality of life specific of IBS, as well as general psychiatric health by SCL-90 during treatment and follow-up periods."( [Treatment of refractory irritable bowel syndrome with subclinical dosage of antidepressants].
Pan, GZ; Qian, JM; Wang, WA, 2003
)
0.53
"Treatment of refractory IBS with subclinical dosage antidepressant is rational and effective, However a further study on its mechanisms is suggested."( [Treatment of refractory irritable bowel syndrome with subclinical dosage of antidepressants].
Pan, GZ; Qian, JM; Wang, WA, 2003
)
0.32
" Twenty-four men with an intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) less than 1 minute were randomly assigned to paroxetine (20 mg/d) or mirtazapine (30 mg/d) for a period of 6 weeks; half the dosage was given in the first week."( Antidepressants and ejaculation: a double-blind, randomized, fixed-dose study with mirtazapine and paroxetine.
Olivier, B; Waldinger, MD; Zwinderman, AH, 2003
)
0.75
" Considerations of the pharmacokinetic properties of paroxetine support a rationale for the development of new dosage forms that maintain the efficacy yet improve the tolerability profile of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors."( Pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, and tolerability of paroxetine and paroxetine CR.
DeVane, CL, 2003
)
0.81
" The described methods were successfully employed with high degrees of precision and accuracy for the estimation of total drug content in human plasma and pharmaceutical dosage forms of POT."( Voltammetric and HPLC techniques for the determination of paroxetine hydrochloride.
Biryol, I; Erk, N, 2003
)
0.56
"Limited information is available regarding optimal dosing or long-term pharmacotherapy with serotonin reuptake inhibitors in obsessive-compulsive disorder."( Acute and long-term treatment and prevention of relapse of obsessive-compulsive disorder with paroxetine.
Allen, A; Burnham, DB; Hollander, E; Oakes, R; Steiner, M; Wheadon, DE, 2003
)
0.54
" In phase 2, 263 phase 1 completers were enrolled in 6 months of flexibly dosed open-label paroxetine treatment."( Acute and long-term treatment and prevention of relapse of obsessive-compulsive disorder with paroxetine.
Allen, A; Burnham, DB; Hollander, E; Oakes, R; Steiner, M; Wheadon, DE, 2003
)
0.76
" During weeks 7 through 10, patients received the dosage determined during the titration period."( Tiagabine for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: a randomized, open-label, clinical trial with paroxetine as a positive control.
Rosenthal, M, 2003
)
0.53
" The reduction in left amygdala volume in patients correlated significantly with higher paroxetine dosage at the time of the follow-up scan and total cumulative paroxetine exposure between the scans."( Amygdala volume reductions in pediatric patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder treated with paroxetine: preliminary findings.
Banerjee, SP; Ivey, J; Lorch, E; MacMillan, S; Madden, R; McMeniman, M; Moore, GJ; Rosenberg, DR; Szeszko, PR, 2004
)
0.76
" The mean levodopa equivalent dosage (LED) was 1010+/-318 mg before surgery and 116+/-93 mg 3 months after surgery."( Effects of deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus on sleep architecture in parkinsonian patients.
Bergamasco, B; Cicolin, A; Fattori, E; Guastamacchia, G; Lanotte, MM; Lopiano, L; Makrydakis, G; Mutani, R; Tavella, A; Terreni, A; Torre, E; Zibetti, M, 2004
)
0.32
"5 mg/d, are reasonable initial dosages, and if symptoms do not improve within a week or two, the dosage can be doubled."( Management of hot flashes in breast cancer survivors and men with prostate cancer.
Stearns, V, 2004
)
0.32
" Multiple SSRI dosing ranges were evaluated in autistic patients of different ages with various functional impairments."( Treating functional impairment of autism with selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors.
Eichner, SF; Jones, JR; Moore, ML, 2004
)
0.32
" After a baseline week of documentation of the frequency of hot flashes, patients were assigned to receive paroxetine; the initial dosage was 12."( Pilot evaluation of paroxetine for treating hot flashes in men.
Barton, DL; Carpenter, LA; Christensen, BJ; Gettman, MT; Loprinzi, CL; Novotny, PJ; Sloan, JA, 2004
)
0.86
"Paroxetine controlled release (CR) is approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) in the dosage range of 25 to 62."( Effectiveness of low doses of paroxetine controlled release in the treatment of major depressive disorder.
Carfagno, ML; Dillingham, KE; Perera, P; Pigotti, TA; Pitts, CD; Trivedi, MH, 2004
)
2.05
"The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 and Geriatric Depression Scale, severity of adverse events and dosing compliance indexes, and discontinuations due to adverse events."( Effects of the serotonin transporter gene promoter polymorphism on mirtazapine and paroxetine efficacy and adverse events in geriatric major depression.
Hollander, SB; Kremer, C; Murphy, GM; Rodrigues, HE; Schatzberg, AF, 2004
)
0.55
" Paxil was prescribed in an initial dosage of 20 mg daily during 12 weeks."( [Clinical effects of paxil in poststroke rehabilitation].
Poverennova, IE; Zolotovskaia, IA, 2005
)
0.33
"Three simple and sensitive spectrophotometric methods were developed and validated for determination of the hydrochloride salts of fluoxetine, sertraline, and paroxetine in their pharmaceutical dosage forms."( Development and validation of spectrophotometric methods for determination of fluoxetine, sertraline, and paroxetine in pharmaceutical dosage forms.
Darwish, IA,
)
0.54
"Patients withdrawn from CT were allowed no more than 3 booster sessions during continuation; patients assigned to continuation medication were kept at full dosage levels."( Prevention of relapse following cognitive therapy vs medications in moderate to severe depression.
Amsterdam, JD; DeRubeis, RJ; Freeman, BB; Gallop, R; Haman, KL; Hollon, SD; Lovett, ML; O'Reardon, JP; Salomon, RM; Shelton, RC; Young, PR, 2005
)
0.33
"We analyzed paroxetine concentrations in serum of 46 depressed patients during treatment with a fixed dosage of 40 mg paroxetine."( Paroxetine serum concentrations in depressed patients and response to treatment.
Deuschle, M; Gilles, M; Härtter, S; Heuser, I; Hiemke, C; Kellner, S; Krumm, B; Shams, M, 2005
)
2.15
"It is concluded that paroxetine at a dosage of 20 mg once daily for 3 consecutive days significantly inhibits the metabolism of tramadol to its active metabolite M1 and reduces but does not abolish the hypoalgesic effect of tramadol in human experimental pain models, particularly in opioid-sensitive tests."( Paroxetine, a cytochrome P450 2D6 inhibitor, diminishes the stereoselective O-demethylation and reduces the hypoalgesic effect of tramadol.
Brøsen, K; Enggaard, TP; Laugesen, S; Pedersen, RS; Sindrup, SH, 2005
)
2.09
"This clinical trial evaluated luteal phase dosing with paroxetine controlled release (CR) (12."( Luteal phase dosing with paroxetine controlled release (CR) in the treatment of premenstrual dysphoric disorder.
Bergeron, R; Gee, MD; Hirschberg, AL; Holland, F; Steiner, M; Van Erp, E, 2005
)
0.88
"A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-arm, fixed-dose study of luteal phase dosing with paroxetine CR in the treatment of PMDD."( Luteal phase dosing with paroxetine controlled release (CR) in the treatment of premenstrual dysphoric disorder.
Bergeron, R; Gee, MD; Hirschberg, AL; Holland, F; Steiner, M; Van Erp, E, 2005
)
0.84
"For the treatment of PMDD, luteal phase dosing with 12."( Luteal phase dosing with paroxetine controlled release (CR) in the treatment of premenstrual dysphoric disorder.
Bergeron, R; Gee, MD; Hirschberg, AL; Holland, F; Steiner, M; Van Erp, E, 2005
)
0.63
" However, the optimal dosing schedule of pindolol remains controversial."( A mathematical model for paroxetine antidepressant effect time course and its interaction with pindolol.
Dauphin, A; Gruwez, B; Tod, M, 2005
)
0.63
"The current study examined the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of paroxetine after repeated multiple oral dosing in children and adolescents with major depressive or obsessive-compulsive disorder."( Multiple dose pharmacokinetics of paroxetine in children and adolescents with major depressive disorder or obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Bartolic, EI; Carpenter, DJ; Danoff, TM; Findling, RL; Fong, R; Gaedigk, A; Gomeni, R; Leeder, JS; Nucci, G; Piergies, AA, 2006
)
0.84
"Rexetin was used in the dosage of 20-60 mg daily during 6 weeks in the treatment of 25 patients with depression."( [Rexetin in the therapy of depressive states].
Bobrov, AS; Kovaleva, AV; Pavlova, ON; Petrun'ko, OV, 2005
)
0.33
" Antidepressant medication costs, however, are significantly higher when fluoxetine is the initial SSRI rather than sertraline or paroxetine, reflecting the larger proportion of fluoxetine patients prescribed a daily dosage of two or more capsules."( Comparing SSRI treatment costs for depression using retrospective claims data: the role of nonrandom selection and skewed data.
Berndt, ER; Colucci, SV; Grudzinski, AN; Miceli, R; Russell, JM; Xu, Y,
)
0.34
" Dosing strategies for the SSRIs sertraline and paroxetine are provided, and an algorithm for PTSD pharmacotherapy is discussed."( Pharmacologic treatment of acute and chronic stress following trauma: 2006.
Davidson, JR, 2006
)
0.59
" The data indicate that female and male subjects with different CYP2D6 polymorphisms have different elimination rates and therefore may need to be dosed differently based on metabolizer genotype."( Paroxetine: population pharmacokinetic analysis in late-life depression using sparse concentration sampling.
Bies, RR; Feng, Y; Ferrell, RE; Kimak, MA; Pollock, BG; Reynolds, CF, 2006
)
1.78
" After three weeks on paroxetine, he was given another trial of clozapine at a starting dosage of 25 mg/daily."( Fatal neuroleptic malignant syndrome in a previously long-term user of clozapine following its reintroduction in combination with paroxetine.
Bernabei, R; Capurso, S; Gambassi, G; Liperoti, R; Tarsitani, P, 2006
)
0.85
" No dosage adjustment should be required when lasofoxifene is coadministered with ketoconazole, fluconazole, paroxetine or other agents that inhibit these CYP enzymes."( Effects of three cytochrome P450 inhibitors, ketoconazole, fluconazole, and paroxetine, on the pharmacokinetics of lasofoxifene.
Bramson, C; Gardner, M; Milton, A; Ouellet, D; Randinitis, E; Remmers, AE; Roman, D, 2007
)
0.78
" The two groups were compared for sex, age, maintenance dosage of paroxetine, duration of treatment with paroxetine, presence of adverse reactions in the early phase of treatment with paroxetine, and method of paroxetine withdrawal (abrupt or tapered)."( Discontinuation syndrome associated with paroxetine in depressed patients: a retrospective analysis of factors involved in the occurrence of the syndrome.
Himei, A; Okamura, T, 2006
)
0.84
" The occurrence of the discontinuation syndrome did not correlate with sex, maintenance dosage of paroxetine or duration of treatment with the drug."( Discontinuation syndrome associated with paroxetine in depressed patients: a retrospective analysis of factors involved in the occurrence of the syndrome.
Himei, A; Okamura, T, 2006
)
0.82
" It appears that the discontinuation syndrome can be prevented by carefully tapering the dosage of paroxetine when treatment is withdrawn."( Discontinuation syndrome associated with paroxetine in depressed patients: a retrospective analysis of factors involved in the occurrence of the syndrome.
Himei, A; Okamura, T, 2006
)
0.82
" Those not rated as significantly improved were then randomly assigned to placebo (N = 27) or paroxetine (N = 25) for 10 weeks, with a flexible dosage design (maximum 60 mg by week 7)."( A controlled trial of paroxetine for chronic PTSD, dissociation, and interpersonal problems in mostly minority adults.
Blanco, C; Garcia, W; Lewis-Fernandez, R; Liebowitz, MR; Lin, SH; Marshall, RD; Neria, Y; Sanchez-Lacay, A; Schneier, F; Simpson, HB; Vermes, D, 2007
)
0.87
"To determine if voluntary prescription change forms for antidepressant drugs could induce dosing changes and reduce the cost of antidepressant therapy in a Medicaid population."( Initial results of the use of prescription order change forms to achieve dose form optimization (consolidation and tablet splitting) of SSRI antidepressants in a state Medicaid program.
Hamer, AM; Hartung, DM; Haxby, DG; Ketchum, KL; Pollack, DA,
)
0.13
" A more intensive dosing regimen (10 or 20 mg/kg twice daily for 4 days) was used to examine PMA/MDMA effects on cortical 5-HT content."( Repeated administration of the substituted amphetamine p-methoxyamphetamine produces reductions in cortical 5-HT transporter binding but not 5-HT content, unlike 3,4-methylenedioxyamethamphetamine.
Callaghan, PD; Daws, LC; Farrand, K; Hughes, P; Irvine, RJ; Salem, A, 2006
)
0.33
" The hypomanic symptoms subsided gradually as the dosage was reduced and the patient thereafter remained in a euthymic state while on venlafaxine at a dose of 18."( [Unipolar depression suddenly switches to hypomania in a patient who has just started taking venlafaxine].
Krol, DG; Nolen, WA, 2006
)
0.33
" The varying sensitivity of scales that measure the severity of depression is one of the many factors affecting the evaluation of the dose-response relationship with antidepressants."( Dose-response relationship of duloxetine in placebo-controlled clinical trials in patients with major depressive disorder.
Bech, P; Kajdasz, DK; Porsdal, V, 2006
)
0.33
" The relevant dosage was already fixed during the acute treatment."( Comparison of Hypericum extract WS 5570 and paroxetine in ongoing treatment after recovery from an episode of moderate to severe depression: results from a randomized multicenter study.
Anghelescu, IG; Kieser, M; Klement, S; Kohnen, R; Szegedi, A, 2006
)
0.59
" This study attempts to quantify the association between first trimester exposure to paroxetine and congenital cardiac malformations, adjusting for possible confounders, and to quantify the dose-response relationship between paroxetine use and cardiac defects."( First trimester exposure to paroxetine and risk of cardiac malformations in infants: the importance of dosage.
Bérard, A; Blais, L; Oraichi, D; Ramos, E; Rey, E; St-André, M, 2007
)
0.86
" Depression occurs in approximately one-third of patients during antiviral therapy and can lead to reduction in treatment dosage or discontinuation of treatment, thus reducing the likelihood of clearing HCV infection."( A randomized trial of paroxetine to prevent interferon-alpha-induced depression in patients with hepatitis C.
Hauser, P; Indest, DW; Loftis, JM; Moles, JK; Morasco, BJ; Rifai, MA, 2007
)
0.65
" Following baseline evaluations, the patients were assigned to receive venlafaxine 75-225 mg/day with the mean dosage 141."( Venlafaxine vs. paroxetine in the acute phase of treatment for major depressive disorder among Han Chinese population in Taiwan.
Chen, YC; Lu, RB; Wu, YS, 2007
)
0.69
"0), their satisfaction reasons were elicited by three multiple-choice responses: efficacy, fewer side effects, and lower dosing frequency."( Patient satisfaction with antidepressants: an Internet-based study.
Nomura, S; Sato, Y; Shigemura, J; Yoshino, A, 2008
)
0.35
" A secondary analysis of dose-response relationships indicated that this advantage was not attributable to the studies using higher doses of duloxetine."( Efficacy of duloxetine and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: comparisons as assessed by remission rates in patients with major depressive disorder.
Detke, MJ; Ossanna, MJ; Pritchett, YL; Swindle, RW; Thase, ME; Xu, J, 2007
)
0.34
"5 yr of age) were randomly assigned to receive a dosage of 50 mg/day of fluvoxamine (n=53) or 20 mg/day of paroxetine (n=52)."( Evaluation of double-blind comparison of fluvoxamine and paroxetine in the treatment of depressed outpatients in menopause transition.
Ikeda, A; Ueki, M; Ushiroyama, T, 2004
)
0.78
" Phase 1 consisted of 10 weeks of open-label paroxetine CR flexibly dosed to a maximum of 62."( Quetiapine augmentation of paroxetine CR for the treatment of refractory generalized anxiety disorder: preliminary findings.
Connor, KM; Davidson, JR; Hoge, EA; LeBeau, RT; Pollack, MH; Simon, NM; Worthington, JJ; Zhang, W, 2008
)
0.9
" His depression had not lessened after 12 days, and the dosage was increased to 20mg daily."( [Paroxetine-induced hyponatremia in an elderly man due to the syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone].
Akishita, M; Eto, M; Ota, H; Ouchi, Y; Yamaguchi, K; Yamaguchi, Y, 2008
)
1.26
"Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were found to be effective in treating premenstrual symptoms, with continuous dosing regimens favored for effectiveness."( Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for premenstrual syndrome and premenstrual dysphoric disorder: a meta-analysis.
Aperi, J; Borenstein, J; Jones, JB; Karne, A; Shah, NR; Shemtov, R, 2008
)
0.35
"To prospectively quantify the dose-response effects of paroxetine and the influence of the serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4) promoter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) on platelet function."( Effect of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine on platelet function is modified by a SLC6A4 serotonin transporter polymorphism.
Abdelmalik, N; Barwari, K; Büller, HR; Kamphuisen, PW; Meijers, JC; Middeldorp, S; Ruhé, HG; Schene, AH; van den Dool, EJ, 2008
)
0.84
"In a 12-week open-label, noncomparative, prospective study, 71 subjects with primary BMS were assigned to receive an initial dosage of paroxetine (10 or 20 mg/day)."( An open-label, noncomparative, dose escalation pilot study of the effect of paroxetine in treatment of burning mouth syndrome.
Hata, H; Kitagawa, Y; Kitamori, S; Onodera, M; Yamazaki, Y, 2009
)
0.79
" The incidence of adverse reactions for the initial daily dosage of 10 mg (41%) was significantly lower than that for 20 mg (76%) (chi(2) test)."( An open-label, noncomparative, dose escalation pilot study of the effect of paroxetine in treatment of burning mouth syndrome.
Hata, H; Kitagawa, Y; Kitamori, S; Onodera, M; Yamazaki, Y, 2009
)
0.58
" The CYP2D6 substrate desipramine (50 mg) was administered alone on day 1 and coadministered on day 6 of dosing with either desvenlafaxine or paroxetine."( The effects of desvenlafaxine and paroxetine on the pharmacokinetics of the cytochrome P450 2D6 substrate desipramine in healthy adults.
Ahmed, S; Fatato, P; Isler, JA; Jiang, Q; Nichols, AI; Patroneva, A; Paul, J; Pedersen, RD; Shenouda, M, 2009
)
0.83
"7 year; 4 females) received 12 weeks of open-label paroxetine treatment, flexibly dosed up to 60 mg/day."( A pilot study of the effects of chronic paroxetine administration on hippocampal N-acetylaspartate in generalized anxiety disorder.
Amiel, JM; Coplan, JD; Mao, X; Mathew, SJ; Price, RB; Shungu, DC; Smith, EL, 2010
)
0.88
" Non-responders on combination therapy had the dosage of both drugs increased by 50%."( Mirtazapine and paroxetine in major depression: a comparison of monotherapy versus their combination from treatment initiation.
Blier, P; Boucher, N; de Montigny, C; Debonnel, G; Gobbi, G; Hébert, C; Turcotte, JE, 2009
)
0.7
" Nevertheless, few studies have covered dosing aspects in order to minimize fetal antidepressant exposure while limiting the risk of treatment failure."( Effect of cytochrome P450 2D6 genotype on maternal paroxetine plasma concentrations during pregnancy.
Belitser, SV; Egberts, TC; Schobben, AF; Ververs, FF; Visser, GH; Voorbij, HA; Zwarts, P, 2009
)
0.6
" Pharmacokinetic (PK)/RO modeling based on the PET results predicted that once daily dosing of >30mg LY686017 led to sustained trough RO of over 80%."( Development of the 2nd generation neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist LY686017 for social anxiety disorder.
Gehlert, DR; Iyengar, S; Kielbasa, W; Marek, G; Mozley, D; Peng, X; Tauscher, J; Vandenhende, F, 2010
)
0.36
" Patients who stopped taking paroxetine abruptly experienced paroxetine discontinuation syndrome significantly more often than patients who had a tapering off of the dosage of medication."( Effects of the serotonin 1A, 2A, 2C, 3A, and 3B and serotonin transporter gene polymorphisms on the occurrence of paroxetine discontinuation syndrome.
Haraguchi, K; Ieiri, I; Imuta, N; Kobayashi, D; Koyama, S; Mine, K; Murata, Y; Nishimura, R, 2010
)
0.86
"Studies have demonstrated an influence of dosage release formulations on drug interactions and enantiomeric plasma concentrations."( Influence of metoprolol dosage release formulation on the pharmacokinetic drug interaction with paroxetine.
Bleske, BE; Brook, R; Kerber, K; Nielsen, J; Shea, M; Stout, SM; Welage, LS, 2011
)
0.59
"A sensitive and simple spectrofluorimetric method has been developed and validated for the determination of the antidepressant paroxetine HCl (PXT) in its dosage forms."( Spectrofluorimetric determination of paroxetine HCl in pharmaceuticals via derivatization with 4-chloro-7- nitrobenzo-2-oxa-1,3-diazole (NBD-Cl).
Belal, F; El-Enany, N; Elmansi, H; Walsh, M, 2011
)
0.85
" Apomorphine and ± 8-OH-DPAT had an inhibiting effect on sexual behavior, but only females dosed with apomorphine showed a different response in avoiders and approachers, more inhibiting effect in avoiders than approachers."( A new female rat animal model for hypoactive sexual desire disorder; behavioral and pharmacological evidence.
Chan, JS; de Jong, TR; Olivier, B; Oosting, RS; Snoeren, EM; Waldinger, MD, 2011
)
0.37
" Repeated-measures anova on sub-items scores of the Panic Attack Anticipatory Anxiety Scale (PAAS) and Dosage Record and Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (DOTES), respectively, used as outcome measures of effectiveness and tolerability, were performed."( Slow vs standard up-titration of paroxetine in the treatment of panic disorder: a prospective randomized trial.
Altamura, C; Bosi, MF; Buoli, M; Dell'osso, B, 2010
)
0.64
" In all groups, (±)8-OH-DPAT showed a clear dose-dependent inhibition of sexual behaviors in vehicle-treated females and a right-shifted dose-response effect in the paroxetine-treated rats."( Chronic paroxetine treatment does not affect sexual behavior in hormonally sub-primed female rats despite 5-HT₁(A) receptor desensitization.
Olivier, B; Oosting, RS; Refsgaard, LK; Snoeren, EM; Waldinger, MD, 2011
)
1
"A total of 60 MDD patients with a score above 18 on the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of fixed dosing treatment with mirtazapine (15-30 mg/day) and paroxetine (10-20 mg/day)."( Efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine in treating major depressive disorder with anxiety symptoms: an 8-week open-label randomised paroxetine-controlled trial.
Cho, HB; Jeong, HS; Jung, JY; Kim, J; Kim, JE; Kim, TS; Lyoo, IK; Shin, E; Yoon, SJ, 2011
)
0.76
" We proposed a systematic classification scheme using FDA-approved drug labeling to assess the DILI potential of drugs, which yielded a benchmark dataset with 287 drugs representing a wide range of therapeutic categories and daily dosage amounts."( FDA-approved drug labeling for the study of drug-induced liver injury.
Chen, M; Fang, H; Liu, Z; Shi, Q; Tong, W; Vijay, V, 2011
)
0.37
" The approved dosage of DMQ is DM 20 mg and Q 10 mg twice daily."( Randomized open-label drug-drug interaction trial of dextromethorphan/quinidine and paroxetine in healthy volunteers.
Pope, LE; Schoedel, KA; Sellers, EM, 2012
)
0.6
" Thus, patients should be monitored for AEs and dosage adjustment considered when combining these two agents."( Randomized open-label drug-drug interaction trial of dextromethorphan/quinidine and paroxetine in healthy volunteers.
Pope, LE; Schoedel, KA; Sellers, EM, 2012
)
0.6
" This paper evaluates the pharmacokinetic properties and potential side effects of single and repeated dosing of paroxetine in Grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus erithacus)."( Pharmacokinetics of paroxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, in Grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus erithacus): influence of pharmaceutical formulation and length of dosing.
Fink-Gremmels, J; Haritova, A; Lumeij, JT; Schoemaker, NJ; Smit, JW; van Maarseveen, EM; van Zeeland, YR, 2013
)
0.92
" Subjects were followed for 12 weeks (6-week dosage adjustment, 6-week maintenance)."( A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of antidepressants in Parkinson disease.
Black, KJ; Brodsky, M; Christine, CW; Como, PG; Elmer, L; Factor, SA; Fernandez, HH; Horn, S; Hyson, HC; Jiang, W; Juncos, J; Kurlan, R; Lyness, JM; Manning, C; Marsh, L; McDermott, MP; McDonald, W; Panisset, M; Pearson, N; Pfeiffer, R; Press, D; Richard, IH; Rottenberg, D; Serrano Ramos, C; Shulman, L; Singer, C; Slevin, J, 2012
)
0.38
" In the present work we studied the in vivo effect of a classic chronic dosing schedule of MDMA in rats, alone or combined with a chronic schedule of NIC, on the density of nAChR and on serotonin reuptake transporters."( 3,4-Methylenedioxy-methamphetamine induces in vivo regional up-regulation of central nicotinic receptors in rats and potentiates the regulatory effects of nicotine on these receptors.
Camarasa, J; Escubedo, E; Garcia-Ratés, S; Pubill, D, 2013
)
0.39
" Therefore, we asked if a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model could be used to evaluate different dosing regimens for pregnant women."( A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model to predict disposition of CYP2D6 and CYP1A2 metabolized drugs in pregnant women.
Isoherranen, N; Ke, AB; Nallani, SC; Rostami-Hodjegan, A; Unadkat, JD; Zhao, P, 2013
)
0.39
"To develop a pharmacokinetic model able to describe the nonlinear pharmacokinetics of paroxetine (PRX) and to predict the drug-drug interaction between PRX and metoprolol under various dosage regimens."( Pharmacokinetic model incorporating mechanism-based inactivation of CYP2D6 can explain both non-linear kinetics and drug interactions of paroxetine.
Hori, S; Mikami, A; Ohtani, H; Sawada, Y, 2013
)
0.82
" Using the developed model and estimated parameters, an optimal dosage regimen for metoprolol during withdrawal of PRX was simulated."( Pharmacokinetic model incorporating mechanism-based inactivation of CYP2D6 can explain both non-linear kinetics and drug interactions of paroxetine.
Hori, S; Mikami, A; Ohtani, H; Sawada, Y, 2013
)
0.59
" Upon tapering PRX from 20 mg/ day to 10 mg/day for 14 days then 5 mg/day for 14 days until cessation, the optimal dosage regimen to resume 120 mg/day of metoprolol based on the developed model was as follows: 30 mg/day during concomitant administration, 40 mg/day for the next 14 days, 60 mg/day for the next 14 days, and finally 120 mg/day."( Pharmacokinetic model incorporating mechanism-based inactivation of CYP2D6 can explain both non-linear kinetics and drug interactions of paroxetine.
Hori, S; Mikami, A; Ohtani, H; Sawada, Y, 2013
)
0.59
"The developed model enabled us to quantitatively estimate drug-drug interactions of PRX and CYP2D6 substrate drugs, and to predict optimal dosage regimens."( Pharmacokinetic model incorporating mechanism-based inactivation of CYP2D6 can explain both non-linear kinetics and drug interactions of paroxetine.
Hori, S; Mikami, A; Ohtani, H; Sawada, Y, 2013
)
0.59
" Data were derived from an earlier study, designed to compare efficacy and tolerability of fixed dosage of extended-release venlafaxine, mitazapine, paroxetine, and risperidone, sodium valproate, buspirone, trazodone or thyroid hormone augmenting to paroxetine in those patients."( Difference in remission in a Chinese population with anxious versus nonanxious treatment-resistant depression: a report of OPERATION study.
Cao, L; Chen, J; Fang, Y; Hong, W; Peng, D; Wu, Z; Yuan, C; Zhang, C, 2013
)
0.59
" Treatment with paroxetine was performed per os with a dosage of 20 mg/g BW."( Chronic social stress during adolescence: interplay of paroxetine treatment and ageing.
Liebl, C; Müller, MB; Scharf, SH; Schmidt, MV; Sterlemann, V, 2013
)
0.98
"8 mg/kg once daily) was administered to rats (PM and PC groups) by an intragastric gavage, and the same dosage of vehicle was administered to rats in the VM and VC groups."( Antidepressive effect of paroxetine in a rat model: upregulating expression of serotonin and norepinephrine transporter.
Li, N; Liu, D; Qin, LJ; Qiu, HM; Wang, LJ; Wu, XH; Yang, JX; Zhou, QX, 2013
)
0.69
" The study sample was divided into two groups: controls (n=33) maintained their own therapy with paroxetine tablets; 38 patients maintained the same dosage of paroxetine, but shifted to liquid formulation 10 mg/ml."( Paroxetine drops versus paroxetine tablets: evaluation of compliance in a six-month study.
Cigala Fulgosi, M; Colombo, C; Colombo, L; Delmonte, D; Gavinelli, C; Marcheggiani, E; Rossini, D; Zanardi, R,
)
1.79
" Then dosage could be maintained at 10 mg or increased according to clinical response."( Potential benefits of slow titration of paroxetine treatment in an elderly population: eight-week results from a naturalistic setting.
De Ronchi, D; Gibiino, S; Mori, E; Serretti, A, 2013
)
0.66
" At the eighth week, significant higher dropouts in patients administered with abrupt dosage was observed (12."( Potential benefits of slow titration of paroxetine treatment in an elderly population: eight-week results from a naturalistic setting.
De Ronchi, D; Gibiino, S; Mori, E; Serretti, A, 2013
)
0.66
" Mean plasma concentrations attained predose on days 18 and 19 (days 13 and 14 of multiple dosing) and at 24 hours postdose (day 20) were similar, suggesting that steady state was achieved by day 13 of multiple dosing after 12 daily doses."( Pharmacokinetic properties of once-daily oral low-dose mesylate salt of paroxetine (LDMP 7.5 mg) following single and multiple doses in healthy postmenopausal women.
Bhaskar, S; Cristina Castelli, M; Lippman, J, 2013
)
0.62
" The variables discussed include dose, dosing schedule, genes, drug-drug interactions, and other medical factors."( Complexities of personalized medicine: how genes, drug-drug interactions, dosing schedules, and other factors can combine to produce clinically meaningful differences in a drug's effect.
Preskorn, SH, 2013
)
0.39
"The aim of this study was to determine whether a tapered dosage regimen of paroxetine in pregnant women might be useful to avoid withdrawal syndromes in neonates after delivery."( Characterization of transplacental transfer of paroxetine in perfused human placenta: development of a pharmacokinetic model to evaluate tapered dosing.
Fujii, T; Hori, S; Matsuoka, S; Nagai, M; Ohtani, H; Satoh, H; Sawada, Y; Taketani, Y, 2013
)
0.88
" The serum paroxetine concentration increased with increasing dosage and was not significantly different between responders and nonresponders."( Nonresponders to daily paroxetine and another SSRI in men with lifelong premature ejaculation: a pharmacokinetic dose-escalation study for a rare phenomenon.
Janssen, PK; Schweitzer, DH; Touw, D; Waldinger, MD, 2014
)
1.1
" We calculated the ratio of the mean doses for each study and weighted it by the total sample size to find the weighted mean ratio for each drug, which was then used to define the drug׳s dosage equivalent to fluoxetine 40mg/d."( Dose equivalents of antidepressants: Evidence-based recommendations from randomized controlled trials.
Barbui, C; Cipriani, A; Furukawa, TA; Hayasaka, Y; Leucht, S; Magni, LR; Ogawa, Y; Purgato, M; Takeshima, N, 2015
)
0.42
" In the primary analysis, fluoxetine 40mg/day was equivalent to paroxetine dosage of 34."( Dose equivalents of antidepressants: Evidence-based recommendations from randomized controlled trials.
Barbui, C; Cipriani, A; Furukawa, TA; Hayasaka, Y; Leucht, S; Magni, LR; Ogawa, Y; Purgato, M; Takeshima, N, 2015
)
0.66
" The allocation to either high- and low-dose antidepressants was not randomized and the dose was guided by a case-by-case decision, which hampers to draw a firm conclusion on dose-response issues and renders the findings as preliminary."( Antidepressant dose and treatment response in bipolar depression: Reanalysis of the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD) data.
Mimura, M; Mizushima, J; Nio, S; Suzuki, T; Tada, M; Uchida, H, 2015
)
0.42
"We compared the effect of vortioxetine, paroxetine and placebo after three days of dosing on sleep architecture."( Differentiated effects of the multimodal antidepressant vortioxetine on sleep architecture: Part 1, a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic comparison with paroxetine in healthy men.
Areberg, J; Buchberg, J; Højer, AM; Nutt, DJ; Wilson, S, 2015
)
0.88
"In this study, the coadministration of single-dose HYD with paroxetine at steady state did not alter systemic exposure to hydrocodone, suggesting that HYD can be coadministered with CYP2D6 inhibitors at therapeutic doses, without dosage modification."( Effects of paroxetine, a CYP2D6 inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetic properties of hydrocodone after coadministration with a single-entity, once-daily, extended-release hydrocodone tablet.
Cipriano, A; Friedman, K; Harris, SC; Kapil, RP; Michels, G; Mondal, SA; Shet, M, 2015
)
1.05
" The present study was designed to clarify the relationship between dosage and treatment response in major depressive disorder."( Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Dose-Response Relationship of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in Major Depressive Disorder.
Bloch, MH; Freemantle, N; Jakubovski, E; Taylor, MJ; Varigonda, AL, 2016
)
0.43
" Endpoint and tolerability analyses were analyzed using meta-regression and stratified subgroup analysis by predefined SSRI dose categories in order to assess the effect of SSRI dosing on the efficacy and tolerability of SSRIs for major depressive disorder."( Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Dose-Response Relationship of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in Major Depressive Disorder.
Bloch, MH; Freemantle, N; Jakubovski, E; Taylor, MJ; Varigonda, AL, 2016
)
0.43
" Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on the risk of suicidality among children associated with use of antidepressants, but the warning's effect on dosing of antidepressants has not been evaluated."( Dosing of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors Among Children and Adults Before and After the FDA Black-Box Warning.
Azrael, D; Bushnell, GA; Miller, M; Pate, V; Stürmer, T; Swanson, SA; White, A, 2016
)
0.43
"The proportion of commercially insured children initiating an SSRI with a low dose was higher after the 2004 FDA warning on the risk of suicidality among children, suggesting improved prescribing practices surrounding SSRI dosing among children."( Dosing of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors Among Children and Adults Before and After the FDA Black-Box Warning.
Azrael, D; Bushnell, GA; Miller, M; Pate, V; Stürmer, T; Swanson, SA; White, A, 2016
)
0.43
" All drugs showed maximum occupancy at 4h after dosing and then decreasing occupancies with time."( Time-course of serotonin transporter occupancy by single dose of three SSRIs in human brain: A positron emission tomography study with [(11)C]DASB.
Arakawa, R; Kim, W; Ogawa, K; Okubo, Y; Sakayori, T; Tateno, A, 2016
)
0.43
" In contrast, among doses above these, there was no indication of a dose-response relationship."( A mega-analysis of fixed-dose trials reveals dose-dependency and a rapid onset of action for the antidepressant effect of three selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
Eriksson, E; Hieronymus, F; Nilsson, S, 2016
)
0.43
" Therefore, in women with a uterus, it is recommended that physicians prescribe combination therapy only to treat menopausal symptoms such as vasomotor symptoms (hot flashes) and vaginal atrophy, using the smallest effective dosage for the shortest possible duration."( Hormone Therapy and Other Treatments for Symptoms of Menopause.
Crider, M; Hill, DA; Hill, SR, 2016
)
0.43
"AD treatment is an important factor for preventing suicide, since the use of AD at adequate dosage and for a proper duration was associated with a lower suicide risk."( Antidepressant use in suicides: a case-control study from the Friuli Venezia Giulia Region, Italy, 2005-2014.
Balestrieri, M; Castelpietra, G; De Vido, C; Gobbato, M; Isacsson, G; Valent, F, 2017
)
0.46
" The dosage of paroxetine was the average dose per day in each week."( Randomized controlled trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with paroxetine for the treatment of patients with first-episode major depressive disorder.
Chen, WH; Li, N; Li, SX; Lu, L; Shi, L; Song, M; Wang, XY; Wang, YM; Yang, LL, 2017
)
1.03
" Thirteen gene positive and symptomatic patients (9M/4W, HD-stage II, age> 40y) together 11 gender/age matched controls without a concurrent diagnosis of psychiatric disorders, underwent a blood test to determine BDNF storage and membrane-bound SERT in platelets by an ELISA immune-enzyme dosage and [3H]-paroxetine ([3H]-PAR) binding, respectively."( Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) and Serotonin Transporter (SERT) in Platelets of Patients with Mild Huntington's Disease: Relationships with Social Cognition Symptoms.
Betti, L; Bonuccelli, U; Ceravolo, R; Giannaccini, G; Kiferle, L; Mazzucchi, S; Palego, L; Palermo, G; Unti, E, 2018
)
0.66
" The approach can be valuable for providing a reliable estimate of TE, for conducting risk/benefit analysis, and for determining dosage recommendations."( Model-Informed Approach to Assess the Treatment Effect Conditional to the Level of Placebo Response.
Bressolle-Gomeni, FMM; Fava, M; Gomeni, R; Goyal, N; Rabinowitz, J, 2019
)
0.51
"Recent meta-analyses on dose-response relationships of SSRIs are largely based on indirect evidence."( In search of a dose-response relationship in SSRIs-a systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis.
Adams, A; Baethge, C; Braun, C; Bschor, T; Kuhr, K; Rink, L, 2020
)
0.56
" Comparisons of dosage groups (low, medium, and high) resulted in only small and clinically non-significant differences for SSRIs as a group, the strongest relating to medium vs low doses (SMD: -0."( In search of a dose-response relationship in SSRIs-a systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis.
Adams, A; Baethge, C; Braun, C; Bschor, T; Kuhr, K; Rink, L, 2020
)
0.56
"There is no conclusive level I or level II evidence of a clinically meaningful dose-response relationship of SSRIs as a group or of single substances."( In search of a dose-response relationship in SSRIs-a systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis.
Adams, A; Baethge, C; Braun, C; Bschor, T; Kuhr, K; Rink, L, 2020
)
0.56
"Since several recent meta-analyses report a dose-response relationship for the antidepressant effect of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), we investigated how these drugs are dosed in clinical practice."( Low SSRI dosing in clinical practice-a register-based longitudinal study.
Eriksson, E; Hieronymus, F; Lisinski, A; Wallerstedt, SM, 2021
)
0.62
" The lack of consensus regarding effective dosing of SSRIs may have contributed to this state of affairs."( Low SSRI dosing in clinical practice-a register-based longitudinal study.
Eriksson, E; Hieronymus, F; Lisinski, A; Wallerstedt, SM, 2021
)
0.62
" Physicochemical, thermal, spectroscopic, diffractometric analysis and in-vitro dissolution tests of the intermediate products and the finished dosage forms were performed."( Performance and paroxetine stability in tablets manufactured by fused deposition modelling-based 3D printing.
Carvalho, FG; Fernandes, AI; Figueiredo, S; Pinto, JF, 2022
)
1.07
"PRX tablets, meeting compendial limits, were manufactured by 3DP, envisaging their clinical use as individually designed dosage forms."( Performance and paroxetine stability in tablets manufactured by fused deposition modelling-based 3D printing.
Carvalho, FG; Fernandes, AI; Figueiredo, S; Pinto, JF, 2022
)
1.07
" Small and mostly insignificant differences in average daily metoprolol dosage were found between patients treated with the various antidepressants."( Co-prescription of metoprolol and CYP2D6-inhibiting antidepressants before and after implementation of an optimized drug interaction database in Norway.
Gedde-Dahl, A; Molden, E; Spigset, O, 2022
)
0.72
" This case report is novel is several aspects: the tics emergence was immediate whereas previous cases were delayed; the tics symptoms were measured and quantified by a validated scale; a dose-response relationship was observed; to our knowledge, our case was the first adolescent female reported; and finally, paroxetine was well-tolerated as a substitute, although it is unclear whether the observed tics-sparing effect is co-incidental, ideocratic or can be replicated."( Sertraline-Induced Tics: A Case Report and Narrative Review.
Arasu, R; Badeshae, S; Chen, W; Furlong, Y, 2023
)
1.08
" No known medication dosage increases had been made, nor had any new serotonergic agents been added to the patient's drug regimen."( A 70-Year-Old Woman Presenting with Confusion and Muscle Spasms Due to Serotonin Syndrome Associated with Paroxetine and Quetiapine Treatment.
Mostel, E; Patel, S; Wiener, BG, 2022
)
0.93
" This well-powered study shows that the guidelines should consider the importance of CYP2D6 genotype for personalized dosing of paroxetine."( Impact of CYP2D6 Genotype on Paroxetine Serum Concentration.
Haslemo, T; Hole, K; Molden, E, 2023
)
1.41
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (5)

RoleDescription
antidepressantAntidepressants are mood-stimulating drugs used primarily in the treatment of affective disorders and related conditions.
anxiolytic drugAnxiolytic drugs are agents that alleviate anxiety, tension, and anxiety disorders, promote sedation, and have a calming effect without affecting clarity of consciousness or neurologic conditions.
serotonin uptake inhibitorA compound that specifically inhibits the reuptake of serotonin in the brain. This increases the serotonin concentration in the synaptic cleft which then activates serotonin receptors to a greater extent.
hepatotoxic agentA role played by a chemical compound exihibiting itself through the ability to induce damage to the liver in animals.
P450 inhibitorAn enzyme inhibitor that interferes with the activity of cytochrome P450 involved in catalysis of organic substances.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (4)

ClassDescription
piperidines
benzodioxoles
organofluorine compoundAn organofluorine compound is a compound containing at least one carbon-fluorine bond.
aromatic etherAny ether in which the oxygen is attached to at least one aryl substituent.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Protein Targets (85)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Chain A, TYROSYL-DNA PHOSPHODIESTERASEHomo sapiens (human)Potency44.66840.004023.8416100.0000AID485290
RAR-related orphan receptor gammaMus musculus (house mouse)Potency5.30800.006038.004119,952.5996AID1159523
ATAD5 protein, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency29.08100.004110.890331.5287AID493107
GLS proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency5.62340.35487.935539.8107AID624146
TDP1 proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency13.11500.000811.382244.6684AID686978; AID686979
GLI family zinc finger 3Homo sapiens (human)Potency6.30860.000714.592883.7951AID1259392
AR proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency19.32270.000221.22318,912.5098AID1259247; AID743035; AID743042; AID743054; AID743063
estrogen receptor 2 (ER beta)Homo sapiens (human)Potency26.60320.000657.913322,387.1992AID1259378
nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group I, member 3Homo sapiens (human)Potency19.94960.001022.650876.6163AID1224893
progesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency29.84930.000417.946075.1148AID1346795
cytochrome P450 family 3 subfamily A polypeptide 4Homo sapiens (human)Potency5.00910.01237.983543.2770AID1645841
glucocorticoid receptor [Homo sapiens]Homo sapiens (human)Potency30.10650.000214.376460.0339AID720691
retinoic acid nuclear receptor alpha variant 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency26.60320.003041.611522,387.1992AID1159552
estrogen nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency28.49730.000229.305416,493.5996AID743069; AID743075; AID743078; AID743079
GVesicular stomatitis virusPotency1.33380.01238.964839.8107AID1645842
cytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)Potency0.44370.00108.379861.1304AID1645840
euchromatic histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2Homo sapiens (human)Potency23.77810.035520.977089.1251AID504332
cytochrome P450, family 19, subfamily A, polypeptide 1, isoform CRA_aHomo sapiens (human)Potency33.49150.001723.839378.1014AID743083
thyroid stimulating hormone receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency21.13170.001628.015177.1139AID1224895
activating transcription factor 6Homo sapiens (human)Potency11.98560.143427.612159.8106AID1159516
nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells 1 (p105), isoform CRA_aHomo sapiens (human)Potency18.995919.739145.978464.9432AID1159509
v-jun sarcoma virus 17 oncogene homolog (avian)Homo sapiens (human)Potency23.91450.057821.109761.2679AID1159526; AID1159528
NPC intracellular cholesterol transporter 1 precursorHomo sapiens (human)Potency58.04790.01262.451825.0177AID485313
D(1A) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency11.22020.02245.944922.3872AID488981
chromobox protein homolog 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency44.66840.006026.168889.1251AID488953
thyroid hormone receptor beta isoform 2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency9.83740.000323.4451159.6830AID743065; AID743067
atrial natriuretic peptide receptor 2 precursorHomo sapiens (human)Potency14.68920.00669.809418.4927AID1347050
ras-related protein Rab-9AHomo sapiens (human)Potency58.04790.00022.621531.4954AID485297
serine/threonine-protein kinase mTOR isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency20.32390.00378.618923.2809AID2660; AID2666; AID2667; AID2668
nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency11.88230.000627.21521,122.0200AID743202
M-phase phosphoprotein 8Homo sapiens (human)Potency33.58750.177824.735279.4328AID488949
Interferon betaHomo sapiens (human)Potency1.33380.00339.158239.8107AID1645842
HLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)Potency1.33380.01238.964839.8107AID1645842
Cellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)Potency29.84930.002319.595674.0614AID651631; AID720552
D(1A) dopamine receptorSus scrofa (pig)Potency26.12160.00378.108123.2809AID2667
Spike glycoproteinSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusPotency39.81070.009610.525035.4813AID1479145
Inositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency1.33380.01238.964839.8107AID1645842
ATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)Potency26.60320.011917.942071.5630AID651632
Ataxin-2Homo sapiens (human)Potency31.04230.011912.222168.7989AID588378; AID651632
cytochrome P450 2C9, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency1.33380.01238.964839.8107AID1645842
ATP-dependent phosphofructokinaseTrypanosoma brucei brucei TREU927Potency0.84920.060110.745337.9330AID485368
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Sodium-dependent noradrenaline transporterMus musculus (house mouse)Ki0.02000.01200.09050.2900AID134216
Voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1FHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)3.90000.00032.63119.0000AID1207758
MyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.02000.02001.88117.6800AID1446226
Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member B1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)0.08600.00041.877310.0000AID625207
Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member B1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki0.08600.00322.28879.3160AID625207
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.53200.00001.23267.7930AID625152
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)Ki0.18900.00000.690210.0000AID625152
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.24400.00001.15467.5858AID625154
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)Ki0.03400.00000.79519.1201AID625154
ATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)29.80000.00022.318510.0000AID681144
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.12300.00010.99178.0000AID625155
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)Ki0.08900.00000.72926.9183AID625155
Quinolone resistance protein NorAStaphylococcus aureusIC50 (µMol)7.00007.00008.50009.7000AID612622
Cytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.50030.00002.015110.0000AID1332024; AID625249
Cytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)Ki4.85000.00011.19868.0000AID589095
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.14500.00001.403910.0000AID625151
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)Ki0.03500.00000.59729.1201AID625151
Angiotensin-converting enzymeOryctolagus cuniculus (rabbit)IC50 (µMol)10.42930.00001.612910.0000AID625171
Angiotensin-converting enzymeOryctolagus cuniculus (rabbit)Ki8.54450.00042.03378.6606AID625171
Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member B1Bos taurus (cattle)Ki0.00040.00040.00180.0044AID408801
Alpha-2B adrenergic receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki6.31000.00000.929610.0000AID36948
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.17900.00011.01049.9280AID625153
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)Ki0.03800.00000.54057.7600AID625153
Beta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Bos taurus (cattle)IC50 (µMol)1.08000.03500.87371.3800AID1460843; AID1744430
Potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)31.90000.00203.19698.0000AID1866612
Alpha-2C adrenergic receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki6.31000.00000.970810.0000AID36948
Alpha-2A adrenergic receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki6.31000.00000.937510.0000AID36948
Sodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.09300.00081.541620.0000AID387487; AID625207
Sodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)Ki0.08800.00031.465610.0000AID254338; AID625207
Sodium-dependent dopamine transporterRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)0.84920.00070.97749.7000AID64685; AID64686
Sodium-dependent dopamine transporterRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki0.40000.00030.37088.1600AID65494
Beta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)1.24000.04201.22762.5000AID1302237; AID1302251; AID1460842; AID1894055
Substance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.90000.00000.09526.8130AID739023
Rhodopsin kinase GRK1Bos taurus (cattle)IC50 (µMol)100.00004.10004.10004.1000AID1460844
Sodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.00070.00010.86458.7096AID1332024; AID387488; AID625222; AID739022
Sodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)Ki0.00020.00000.70488.1930AID1332036; AID1783171; AID254322; AID302140; AID361595; AID361596; AID408801; AID408802; AID625222
Sodium-dependent serotonin transporterRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)0.00030.00030.81978.4900AID205038
Sodium-dependent serotonin transporterRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki0.00060.00000.705610.0000AID204534; AID204695
G protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)100.00000.02460.27200.8300AID1302239
G protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Bos taurus (cattle)IC50 (µMol)100.00000.44000.44000.4400AID1460845
P2X purinoceptor 4Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)2.45002.45002.50002.6000AID1528205; AID709133
Voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)3.90000.00032.59559.0000AID1207758
Sodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.67200.00071.841946.0000AID625256
Sodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)Ki0.46700.00021.11158.0280AID254319; AID625256
Potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)10.42930.00091.901410.0000AID625171
Potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)Ki8.54450.00211.840710.0000AID625171
Voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)3.90000.00032.63119.0000AID1207758
Voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)3.90000.00032.25459.6000AID1207758
Rhodopsin kinase GRK1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)100.00000.05780.15860.3400AID1302238
Sodium-dependent serotonin transporterMus musculus (house mouse)Ki0.00040.00040.59574.1000AID134217
Sodium-dependent dopamine transporterMus musculus (house mouse)Ki0.46000.40400.68731.0350AID134215
Nuclear receptor subfamily 3 group C member 3 Bos taurus (cattle)IC50 (µMol)10.42930.10482.83988.3173AID625171
Nuclear receptor subfamily 3 group C member 3 Bos taurus (cattle)Ki8.54450.08582.95428.6606AID625171
P2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)2.80670.15602.93526.1000AID1064727; AID1528204; AID709142
Sigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)5.36600.00030.70285.3660AID625223
Sigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)Ki2.25500.00000.490110.0000AID625223
TransporterRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)0.53500.00081.95628.8000AID147593
TransporterRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki0.65960.00010.866710.0000AID147740
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Activation Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1AHomo sapiens (human)Kd30.81140.00010.95285.0119AID438555
Sodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)Kd0.04000.00080.25331.0600AID145563
Beta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)Kd2.98000.17005.579122.4940AID1698791
Sodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)Kd0.00010.00010.03170.2000AID204080
Sodium-dependent serotonin transporterRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Kd0.00020.00020.00020.0002AID204516
Sodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)Kd0.49000.02502.14439.3000AID64372
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Other Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Beta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Mus musculus (house mouse)MEC10.000010.000010.000010.0000AID1460863
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (481)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
visual perceptionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1FHomo sapiens (human)
detection of light stimulus involved in visual perceptionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1FHomo sapiens (human)
calcium ion import across plasma membraneVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1FHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STATInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STATInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of autophagyInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine-mediated signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
natural killer cell activationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-serine phosphorylation of STAT proteinInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to interferon-betaInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell proliferationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of viral genome replicationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
innate immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of innate immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of MHC class I biosynthetic processInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of T cell differentiationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
defense response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
type I interferon-mediated signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
neuron cellular homeostasisInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of Lewy body formationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of T-helper 2 cell cytokine productionInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell differentiationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
natural killer cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
adaptive immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
T cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
humoral immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of T cell mediated cytotoxicityHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
adaptive immune responseHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
antigen processing and presentation of endogenous peptide antigen via MHC class I via ER pathway, TAP-independentHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of T cell anergyHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
defense responseHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
immune responseHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
detection of bacteriumHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of interleukin-12 productionHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of interleukin-6 productionHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
protection from natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicityHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
innate immune responseHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of dendritic cell differentiationHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
antigen processing and presentation of endogenous peptide antigen via MHC class IbHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycle G2/M phase transitionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ER overload responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucose starvationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
in utero embryonic developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
somitogenesisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
release of cytochrome c from mitochondriaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
hematopoietic progenitor cell differentiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell proliferation involved in immune responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
B cell lineage commitmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell lineage commitmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to ischemiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleotide-excision repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
double-strand break repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein import into nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
autophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in cell cycle arrestCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in transcription of p21 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
Ras protein signal transductionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
gastrulationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
neuroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of neuroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein localizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA replicationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
determination of adult lifespanCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
rRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to salt stressCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to inorganic substanceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to X-rayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to gamma radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle cell apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cardiac muscle cell apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
glial cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
viral processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
glucose catabolic process to lactate via pyruvateCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cerebellum developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell growthCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitotic G1 DNA damage checkpoint signalingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of telomere maintenance via telomeraseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell differentiation in thymusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
tumor necrosis factor-mediated signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of tissue remodelingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to UVCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
multicellular organism growthCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of mitochondrial membrane permeabilityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucose starvationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
entrainment of circadian clock by photoperiodCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial DNA repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neuron apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription initiation-coupled chromatin remodelingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of proteolysisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of RNA polymerase II transcription preinitiation complex assemblyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to antibioticCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
fibroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of fibroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
circadian behaviorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
bone marrow developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
embryonic organ developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein stabilizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of helicase activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein tetramerizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromosome organizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
neuron apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
hematopoietic stem cell differentiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of glial cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
type II interferon-mediated signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac septum morphogenesisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of programmed necrotic cell deathCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complex assemblyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to endoplasmic reticulum stressCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
thymocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of thymocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
necroptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to hypoxiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to xenobiotic stimulusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to ionizing radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to gamma radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to UV-CCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
stem cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to actinomycin DCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of release of cytochrome c from mitochondriaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
replicative senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
oxidative stress-induced premature senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
oligodendrocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of execution phase of apoptosisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of mitophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of mitochondrial membrane permeability involved in apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of G1 to G0 transitionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of miRNA processingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of glucose catabolic process to lactate via pyruvateCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of pentose-phosphate shuntCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to hypoxiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of fibroblast apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of stem cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cellular senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
hydrogen peroxide catabolic processMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
response to yeastMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
hypochlorous acid biosynthetic processMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
respiratory burst involved in defense responseMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
defense responseMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
response to oxidative stressMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
response to mechanical stimulusMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
removal of superoxide radicalsMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
response to foodMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
response to lipopolysaccharideMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
low-density lipoprotein particle remodelingMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
hydrogen peroxide catabolic processMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic processMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
defense response to fungusMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
response to gold nanoparticleMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
defense response to bacteriumMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-modulating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
nervous system developmentMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart contractionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
response to virusMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
presynaptic modulation of chemical synaptic transmissionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of smooth muscle contractionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-inhibiting G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmissionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
signal transductionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of locomotionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-inhibiting G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmissionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
G2/M transition of mitotic cell cycleATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
phospholipid translocationATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
terpenoid transportATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of response to osmotic stressATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
transepithelial transportATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
stem cell proliferationATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ceramide translocationATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
export across plasma membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of anion channel activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
carboxylic acid transmembrane transportATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic detoxification by transmembrane export across the plasma membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transport across blood-brain barrierATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of chloride transportATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
behavioral fear response5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1AHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1AHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-inhibiting serotonin receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1AHomo sapiens (human)
serotonin receptor signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1AHomo sapiens (human)
gamma-aminobutyric acid signaling pathway5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1AHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell population proliferation5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1AHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of serotonin secretion5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1AHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of vasoconstriction5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1AHomo sapiens (human)
exploration behavior5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1AHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of dopamine metabolic process5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1AHomo sapiens (human)
serotonin metabolic process5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1AHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of hormone secretion5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1AHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of behavior5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1AHomo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmission5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1AHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messenger5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1AHomo sapiens (human)
gastric acid secretionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine transportMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
transmission of nerve impulseMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of phosphatidylinositol dephosphorylationMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmissionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-inhibiting G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
steroid metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
cholesterol metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
estrogen metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
coumarin metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
alkaloid metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
alkaloid catabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
monoterpenoid metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
isoquinoline alkaloid metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic catabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
retinol metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
long-chain fatty acid biosynthetic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of bindingCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
oxidative demethylationCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cellular organofluorine metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
arachidonic acid metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of monoatomic ion transportMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
signal transductionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
protein kinase C-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
neuromuscular synaptic transmissionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
nervous system developmentMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of locomotionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
saliva secretionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
cognitionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of postsynaptic membrane potentialMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of glial cell proliferationMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of intracellular protein transportMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic modulation of chemical synaptic transmissionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-inhibiting G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmissionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
retinoid metabolic processAldo-keto reductase family 1 member B1Bos taurus (cattle)
prostaglandin metabolic processAldo-keto reductase family 1 member B1Bos taurus (cattle)
retinol metabolic processAldo-keto reductase family 1 member B1Bos taurus (cattle)
calcium-mediated signalingMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of monoatomic ion transmembrane transporter activityMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
smooth muscle contractionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
signal transductionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
synaptic transmission, cholinergicMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
nervous system developmentMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of insulin secretionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
protein modification processMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of smooth muscle contractionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
saliva secretionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
ion channel modulating, G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
ligand-gated ion channel signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of smooth muscle contractionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-inhibiting G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmissionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
desensitization of G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Bos taurus (cattle)
G protein-coupled receptor internalizationBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Bos taurus (cattle)
negative regulation of the force of heart contraction by chemical signalBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Bos taurus (cattle)
protein phosphorylationBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Bos taurus (cattle)
intracellular protein transportBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Bos taurus (cattle)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Bos taurus (cattle)
G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Bos taurus (cattle)
regulation of signal transductionBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Bos taurus (cattle)
peptidyl-serine phosphorylationBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Bos taurus (cattle)
positive regulation of smoothened signaling pathwayBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Bos taurus (cattle)
negative regulation of striated muscle contractionBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Bos taurus (cattle)
cardiac muscle contractionBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Bos taurus (cattle)
negative regulation of relaxation of smooth muscleBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Bos taurus (cattle)
positive regulation of protein localization to ciliumBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Bos taurus (cattle)
potassium ion transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 3Homo sapiens (human)
optic nerve developmentPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 3Homo sapiens (human)
corpus callosum developmentPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 3Homo sapiens (human)
protein homooligomerizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 3Homo sapiens (human)
action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 3Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 3Homo sapiens (human)
monoamine transportSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transportSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmissionSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
response to painSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine uptakeSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neuron cellular homeostasisSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
amino acid transportSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine transportSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine uptake involved in synaptic transmissionSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
sodium ion transmembrane transportSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
desensitization of G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of the force of heart contraction by chemical signalBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
tachykinin receptor signaling pathwayBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
heart developmentBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
peptidyl-serine phosphorylationBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
viral genome replicationBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
receptor internalizationBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of catecholamine secretionBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of striated muscle contractionBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
symbiont entry into host cellBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle contractionBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of relaxation of smooth muscleBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of the force of heart contractionBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein phosphorylationBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
aggressive behaviorSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of leukocyte migrationSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
angiotensin-mediated drinking behaviorSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
inflammatory responseSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwaySubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cytosolic calcium ion concentrationSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
tachykinin receptor signaling pathwaySubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
long-term memorySubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
associative learningSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
detection of abiotic stimulusSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to ozoneSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of epithelial cell migrationSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to auditory stimulusSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of smooth muscle cell migrationSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of synaptic transmission, cholinergicSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of synaptic transmission, GABAergicSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to estradiolSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to progesteroneSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to nicotineSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
operant conditioningSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
sperm ejaculationSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
eating behaviorSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of vascular permeabilitySubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of action potentialSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of blood pressureSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of ossificationSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of vasoconstrictionSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of hormone secretionSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
behavioral response to painSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of smooth muscle cell proliferationSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of lymphocyte proliferationSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of epithelial cell proliferationSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of stress fiber assemblySubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to electrical stimulusSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
smooth muscle contraction involved in micturitionSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of uterine smooth muscle contractionSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of flagellated sperm motilitySubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
signal transductionRhodopsin kinase GRK1Bos taurus (cattle)
visual perceptionRhodopsin kinase GRK1Bos taurus (cattle)
regulation of opsin-mediated signaling pathwayRhodopsin kinase GRK1Bos taurus (cattle)
protein autophosphorylationRhodopsin kinase GRK1Bos taurus (cattle)
monoamine transportSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
response to hypoxiaSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transportSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
response to nutrientSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
memorySodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
circadian rhythmSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
response to toxic substanceSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of serotonin secretionSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cerebellar granule cell precursor proliferationSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of synaptic transmission, dopaminergicSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
response to estradiolSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
social behaviorSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
vasoconstrictionSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
sperm ejaculationSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of neuron differentiationSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell cycleSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of organ growthSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
behavioral response to cocaineSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
enteric nervous system developmentSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
brain morphogenesisSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
serotonin uptakeSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarizationSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
platelet aggregationSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to retinoic acidSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to cGMPSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of thalamus sizeSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
conditioned place preferenceSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
sodium ion transmembrane transportSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
amino acid transportSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
apoptotic processG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Homo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-modulating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Homo sapiens (human)
tachykinin receptor signaling pathwayG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell population proliferationG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Homo sapiens (human)
Wnt signaling pathwayG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic processG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Homo sapiens (human)
fat cell differentiationG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Homo sapiens (human)
protein autophosphorylationG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Homo sapiens (human)
protein phosphorylationG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of signal transductionG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Homo sapiens (human)
apoptotic processG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Bos taurus (cattle)
Wnt signaling pathwayG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Bos taurus (cattle)
negative regulation of apoptotic processG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Bos taurus (cattle)
protein autophosphorylationG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Bos taurus (cattle)
calcium ion transportVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-modulating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
sensory perception of soundVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of adenylate cyclase activityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of calcium ion transportVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of atrial cardiac muscle cell membrane repolarizationVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
calcium ion importVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
calcium ion transmembrane transportVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle cell action potential involved in contractionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during cardiac muscle cell action potentialVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during SA node cell action potentialVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by cardiac conductionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of potassium ion transmembrane transporter activityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of potassium ion transmembrane transportVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
calcium ion import across plasma membraneVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
monoamine transportSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transportSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
lactationSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
sensory perception of smellSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
locomotory behaviorSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
response to iron ionSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine transportSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
adenohypophysis developmentSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
response to nicotineSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of multicellular organism growthSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of dopamine metabolic processSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
response to cocaineSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine biosynthetic processSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine catabolic processSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
cognitionSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine uptake involved in synaptic transmissionSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
response to cAMPSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine uptakeSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
prepulse inhibitionSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine uptakeSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
hyaloid vascular plexus regressionSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
amino acid transportSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine transportSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
sodium ion transmembrane transportSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by cardiac conductionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by hormonePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of membrane potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion homeostasisPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle contractionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of membrane repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of ventricular cardiac muscle cell membrane repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to xenobiotic stimulusPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by cardiac conductionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion export across plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of potassium ion export across plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion import across plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
skeletal system developmentVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
extraocular skeletal muscle developmentVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
calcium ion transportVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
muscle contractionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
striated muscle contractionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum organizationVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
myoblast fusionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
neuromuscular junction developmentVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
skeletal muscle adaptationVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of muscle contractionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
skeletal muscle fiber developmentVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
release of sequestered calcium ion into cytosolVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
calcium ion transmembrane transportVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to caffeineVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
calcium ion import across plasma membraneVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
immune system developmentVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cytosolic calcium ion concentrationVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
heart developmentVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cardiac muscle contraction by regulation of the release of sequestered calcium ionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
embryonic forelimb morphogenesisVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
camera-type eye developmentVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of adenylate cyclase activityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of muscle contractionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
calcium ion transport into cytosolVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
cardiac conductionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
calcium ion transmembrane transport via high voltage-gated calcium channelVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
calcium ion transmembrane transportVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle cell action potential involved in contractionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during cardiac muscle cell action potentialVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during AV node cell action potentialVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
cell communication by electrical coupling involved in cardiac conductionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by cardiac conductionVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potentialVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during atrial cardiac muscle cell action potentialVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
calcium ion import across plasma membraneVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
visual perceptionRhodopsin kinase GRK1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayRhodopsin kinase GRK1Homo sapiens (human)
rhodopsin mediated signaling pathwayRhodopsin kinase GRK1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of opsin-mediated signaling pathwayRhodopsin kinase GRK1Homo sapiens (human)
protein autophosphorylationRhodopsin kinase GRK1Homo sapiens (human)
protein phosphorylationRhodopsin kinase GRK1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of signal transductionRhodopsin kinase GRK1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol phosphate metabolic processInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylinositol phosphate biosynthetic processInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cold-induced thermogenesisInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol phosphate biosynthetic processInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell population proliferationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of B cell proliferationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear DNA replicationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
signal transduction in response to DNA damageATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
isotype switchingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA replicationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of isotype switching to IgG isotypesATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
DNA clamp unloadingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of mitotic cell cycle phase transitionATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell cycle G2/M phase transitionATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of ruffle assemblyP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
tissue homeostasisP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of sodium ion transportP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
response to ischemiaP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
signal transductionP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of blood pressureP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of calcium ion transport into cytosolP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cardiac muscle hypertrophyP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
neuronal action potentialP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
sensory perception of painP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
calcium-mediated signalingP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of prostaglandin secretionP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
response to ATPP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic ion transmembrane transportP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
response to fluid shear stressP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
purinergic nucleotide receptor signaling pathwayP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
endothelial cell activationP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of blood vessel endothelial cell migrationP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of nitric oxide biosynthetic processP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
behavioral response to painP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
response to axon injuryP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of calcium-mediated signalingP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of chemotaxisP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
sensory perception of touchP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B signal transductionP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarizationP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of calcium ion transportP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cardiac muscle contractionP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
relaxation of cardiac muscleP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
excitatory postsynaptic potentialP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
calcium ion transmembrane transportP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to zinc ionP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to ATPP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
apoptotic signaling pathwayP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of microglial cell migrationP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of endothelial cell chemotaxisP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of receptor internalizationAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of translationAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA metabolic processAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
P-body assemblyAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
stress granule assemblyAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA transportAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
lipid transportSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
nervous system developmentSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled opioid receptor signaling pathwaySigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of neuron apoptotic processSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein homotrimerizationSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (149)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
voltage-gated calcium channel activityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1FHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1FHomo sapiens (human)
high voltage-gated calcium channel activityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1FHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine activityInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine receptor bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
type I interferon receptor bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
chloramphenicol O-acetyltransferase activityInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
TAP bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
signaling receptor bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
peptide antigen bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
TAP bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
protein-folding chaperone bindingHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
transcription cis-regulatory region bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
core promoter sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
TFIID-class transcription factor complex bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription repressor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protease bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
p53 bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromatin bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA 3'-UTR bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
copper ion bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
receptor tyrosine kinase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase regulator activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ATP-dependent DNA/DNA annealing activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein heterodimerization activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-folding chaperone bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein phosphatase 2A bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II-specific DNA-binding transcription factor bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
14-3-3 protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
MDM2/MDM4 family protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
disordered domain specific bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
general transcription initiation factor bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
molecular function activator activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
promoter-specific chromatin bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromatin bindingMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
peroxidase activityMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
heparin bindingMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
heme bindingMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor activityMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
arrestin family protein bindingMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor activityMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor activityMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor activityMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
efflux transmembrane transporter activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transporter activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
carboxylic acid transmembrane transporter activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylcholine floppase activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylethanolamine flippase activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ceramide floppase activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
floppase activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1AHomo sapiens (human)
protein binding5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1AHomo sapiens (human)
receptor-receptor interaction5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1AHomo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter receptor activity5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1AHomo sapiens (human)
serotonin binding5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1AHomo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylinositol phospholipase C activityMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor activityMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor activityMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
monooxygenase activityCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
iron ion bindingCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
oxidoreductase activityCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
oxidoreductase activity, acting on paired donors, with incorporation or reduction of molecular oxygen, reduced flavin or flavoprotein as one donor, and incorporation of one atom of oxygenCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
heme bindingCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
anandamide 8,9 epoxidase activityCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
anandamide 11,12 epoxidase activityCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
anandamide 14,15 epoxidase activityCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylinositol phospholipase C activityMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor activityMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor activityMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
retinal dehydrogenase activityAldo-keto reductase family 1 member B1Bos taurus (cattle)
prostaglandin H2 endoperoxidase reductase activityAldo-keto reductase family 1 member B1Bos taurus (cattle)
allyl-alcohol dehydrogenase activityAldo-keto reductase family 1 member B1Bos taurus (cattle)
glycerol dehydrogenase [NADP+] activityAldo-keto reductase family 1 member B1Bos taurus (cattle)
all-trans-retinol dehydrogenase (NADP+) activityAldo-keto reductase family 1 member B1Bos taurus (cattle)
phosphatidylinositol phospholipase C activityMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor activityMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
signaling receptor activityMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
acetylcholine bindingMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor activityMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
protein kinase activityBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Bos taurus (cattle)
G protein-coupled receptor kinase activityBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Bos taurus (cattle)
protein bindingBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Bos taurus (cattle)
ATP bindingBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Bos taurus (cattle)
alpha-2A adrenergic receptor bindingBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Bos taurus (cattle)
Edg-2 lysophosphatidic acid receptor bindingBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Bos taurus (cattle)
beta-adrenergic receptor kinase activityBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Bos taurus (cattle)
voltage-gated monoatomic ion channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 3Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 3Homo sapiens (human)
outward rectifier potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 3Homo sapiens (human)
delayed rectifier potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 3Homo sapiens (human)
actin bindingSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transmembrane transporter activitySodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter:sodium symporter activitySodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine:sodium symporter activitySodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine:sodium symporter activitySodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
monoamine transmembrane transporter activitySodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
alpha-tubulin bindingSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
beta-tubulin bindingSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
protein kinase activityBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor kinase activityBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
alpha-2A adrenergic receptor bindingBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
Edg-2 lysophosphatidic acid receptor bindingBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
beta-adrenergic receptor kinase activityBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor bindingBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
tachykinin receptor activitySubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
substance P receptor activitySubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingRhodopsin kinase GRK1Bos taurus (cattle)
ATP bindingRhodopsin kinase GRK1Bos taurus (cattle)
rhodopsin kinase activityRhodopsin kinase GRK1Bos taurus (cattle)
integrin bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
monoatomic cation channel activitySodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transmembrane transporter activitySodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
serotonin:sodium:chloride symporter activitySodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
monoamine transmembrane transporter activitySodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
antiporter activitySodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
syntaxin-1 bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
cocaine bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
sodium ion bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
nitric-oxide synthase bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
actin filament bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
serotonin bindingSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
protein serine/threonine kinase activityG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor kinase activityG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Homo sapiens (human)
protein kinase C bindingG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Homo sapiens (human)
phospholipid bindingG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Homo sapiens (human)
beta-adrenergic receptor kinase activityG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Homo sapiens (human)
protein kinase activityG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Homo sapiens (human)
protein serine/threonine kinase activityG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Bos taurus (cattle)
G protein-coupled receptor kinase activityG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Bos taurus (cattle)
ATP bindingG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Bos taurus (cattle)
lipid bindingG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Bos taurus (cattle)
high voltage-gated calcium channel activityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel activityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
calcium channel activityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
ankyrin bindingVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
alpha-actinin bindingVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel activity involved in cardiac muscle cell action potentialVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel activity involved SA node cell action potentialVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
protease bindingSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
signaling receptor bindingSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transmembrane transporter activitySodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine:sodium symporter activitySodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
monoamine transmembrane transporter activitySodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine bindingSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
amine bindingSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complex bindingSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
protein phosphatase 2A bindingSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
heterocyclic compound bindingSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine:sodium symporter activitySodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
transcription cis-regulatory region bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
inward rectifier potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
delayed rectifier potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein homodimerization activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
C3HC4-type RING finger domain bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activity involved in cardiac muscle cell action potential repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
scaffold protein bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activity involved in ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potential repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel activityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
calmodulin bindingVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
high voltage-gated calcium channel activityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
small molecule bindingVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
molecular function activator activityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
high voltage-gated calcium channel activityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel activity involved in cardiac muscle cell action potentialVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel activityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
calmodulin bindingVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
high voltage-gated calcium channel activityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
alpha-actinin bindingVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel activity involved in cardiac muscle cell action potentialVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel activity involved in AV node cell action potentialVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
protein kinase activityRhodopsin kinase GRK1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingRhodopsin kinase GRK1Homo sapiens (human)
rhodopsin kinase activityRhodopsin kinase GRK1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol-1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol hexakisphosphate kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol heptakisphosphate kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol hexakisphosphate 5-kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol hexakisphosphate 1-kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol hexakisphosphate 3-kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol 5-diphosphate pentakisphosphate 5-kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
inositol diphosphate tetrakisphosphate kinase activityInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
DNA clamp unloader activityATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
purinergic nucleotide receptor activityP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
extracellularly ATP-gated monoatomic cation channel activityP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
signaling receptor bindingP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
copper ion bindingP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
cadherin bindingP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
ligand-gated calcium channel activityP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
RNA bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
epidermal growth factor receptor bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled opioid receptor activitySigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (110)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
photoreceptor outer segmentVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1FHomo sapiens (human)
membraneVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1FHomo sapiens (human)
perikaryonVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1FHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel complexVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1FHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
ER to Golgi transport vesicle membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
secretory granule membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
phagocytic vesicle membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
early endosome membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
recycling endosome membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
lumenal side of endoplasmic reticulum membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
MHC class I protein complexHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
external side of plasma membraneHLA class I histocompatibility antigen, B alpha chain Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear bodyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
replication forkCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial matrixCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
centrosomeCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear matrixCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
PML bodyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription repressor complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
site of double-strand breakCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
germ cell nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromatinCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription regulator complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
lysosomeMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
secretory granuleMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
azurophil granule lumenMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
azurophil granuleMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular membrane-bounded organelleMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
phagocytic vesicle lumenMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceMyeloperoxidaseHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
clathrin-coated endocytic vesicle membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
asymmetric synapseMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
symmetric synapseMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
presynaptic membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell bodyMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
axon terminusMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
glutamatergic synapseMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
cholinergic synapseMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
synapseMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
dendriteMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
dendriteMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
synapseMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
external side of apical plasma membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membrane5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1AHomo sapiens (human)
synapse5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1AHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membrane5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1AHomo sapiens (human)
dendrite5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1AHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
dendriteMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
synapseMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M5Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular membrane-bounded organelleCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
presynaptic membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
axon terminusMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
Schaffer collateral - CA1 synapseMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic density membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
glutamatergic synapseMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
cholinergic synapseMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
synapseMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
dendriteMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
synapseMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
dendriteMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Bos taurus (cattle)
cytosolBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Bos taurus (cattle)
plasma membraneBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Bos taurus (cattle)
membraneBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Bos taurus (cattle)
cell projectionBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Bos taurus (cattle)
presynapseBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Bos taurus (cattle)
postsynapseBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Bos taurus (cattle)
plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 3Homo sapiens (human)
presynaptic membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 3Homo sapiens (human)
calyx of HeldPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 3Homo sapiens (human)
membrane raftPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 3Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glutamatergic synapsePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 3Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel complexPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 3Homo sapiens (human)
axonPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 3Homo sapiens (human)
membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily A member 3Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
membraneSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell body membraneSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
presynaptic membraneSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
axonSodium-dependent noradrenaline transporter Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
ciliumBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
membraneBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
presynapseBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
postsynapseBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
dendriteSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
sperm flagellumSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cell bodySubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
sperm headSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
sperm midpieceSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
sperm midpieceSubstance-P receptorHomo sapiens (human)
photoreceptor disc membraneRhodopsin kinase GRK1Bos taurus (cattle)
plasma membraneSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
focal adhesionSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
endosome membraneSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
endomembrane systemSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
presynaptic membraneSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
membrane raftSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
synapseSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic membraneSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
serotonergic synapseSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
synapseSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionSodium-dependent serotonin transporterHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear speckG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear membraneG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Bos taurus (cattle)
plasma membraneG protein-coupled receptor kinase 5Bos taurus (cattle)
virion membraneSpike glycoproteinSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus
plasma membraneVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
Z discVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel complexVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
L-type voltage-gated calcium channel complexVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1D Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
membraneSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
axonSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell bodySodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
axon terminusSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
membrane raftSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic membraneSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
dopaminergic synapseSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
flotillin complexSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
axonSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
presynaptic membraneSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell body membraneSodium-dependent dopamine transporter Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfacePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel complexPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
inward rectifier potassium channel complexPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
sarcoplasmic reticulumVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
T-tubuleVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
I bandVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
L-type voltage-gated calcium channel complexVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel complexVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1SHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic densityVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
membraneVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
Z discVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
dendriteVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
perikaryonVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic density membraneVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
L-type voltage-gated calcium channel complexVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel complexVoltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit alpha-1CHomo sapiens (human)
photoreceptor disc membraneRhodopsin kinase GRK1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmRhodopsin kinase GRK1Homo sapiens (human)
fibrillar centerInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmInositol hexakisphosphate kinase 1Homo sapiens (human)
Elg1 RFC-like complexATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
lysosomal membraneP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
membraneP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
cell junctionP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell bodyP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
terminal boutonP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
dendritic spineP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
cell bodyP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneP2X purinoceptor 4Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
trans-Golgi networkAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic stress granuleAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
membraneAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
ribonucleoprotein complexAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic stress granuleAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear envelopeSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear inner membraneSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear outer membraneSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
lipid dropletSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic densitySigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
membraneSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
growth coneSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic vesicleSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
anchoring junctionSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic density membraneSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
ciliumBeta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1Mus musculus (house mouse)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (316)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1347412qHTS assay to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: Counter screen cell viability and HiBit confirmation2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID64372Equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) for Competitive binding between [3H]WIN-35428 and the compound at human transporter-hDAT1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-03, Volume: 8, Issue:5
Synthesis of a potent wide-spectrum serotonin-, norepinephrine-, dopamine-reuptake inhibitor (SNDRI) and a species-selective dopamine-reuptake inhibitor based on the gamma-amino alcohol functional group.
AID1636485Drug activation in human Hep3B cells assessed as human CYP2C9-mediated drug metabolism-induced cytotoxicity measured as decrease in cell viability at 9.1 uM pre-incubated with BSO for 18 hrs followed by incubation with compound for 3 hrs in presence of NA2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 26, Issue:16
Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
AID1744429Inhibition of human GRK5 using porcine brain tubulin as substrate incubated for 3 to 5 mins by [gamma32P]ATP based radiometric assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 01-14, Volume: 64, Issue:1
Generation of Highly Selective, Potent, and Covalent G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 5 Inhibitors.
AID1220554Fraction unbound in Wistar Han rat brain homogenates at 1 uM after 6 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Species independence in brain tissue binding using brain homogenates.
AID496830Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania major2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID588218FDA HLAED, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID612622Inhibition of NorA in Staphylococcus aureus 1199B assessed as inhibition of ethidium bromide efflux dose response curve based fluorometric assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-25, Volume: 54, Issue:16
Evolution from a natural flavones nucleus to obtain 2-(4-Propoxyphenyl)quinoline derivatives as potent inhibitors of the S. aureus NorA efflux pump.
AID302140Displacement of [3H]paroxetine from SERT receptor in human platelet membrane2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 15, Issue:24
1-Aminocyclopentane-1,2,4-tricarboxylic acids screening on glutamatergic and serotonergic systems.
AID496831Antimicrobial activity against Cryptosporidium parvum2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID1528204Antagonist activity at human P2X4 receptor tranfected in human 1321N1 cells assessed as inhibition of ATP-induced calcium influx incubated for 10 mins by Fluo2-AM staining based inverted fluorescence microscopic method2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 12-26, Volume: 62, Issue:24
Discovery and Characterization of the Potent and Selective P2X4 Inhibitor
AID1332024Inhibition of human SERT expressed in CHO cell membranes assessed as reduction in [3H]serotonin uptake preincubated for 10 mins followed by [3H]serotonin addition measured after 20 mins by liquid scintillation counting method2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 01-01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Discovery of SMP-304, a novel benzylpiperidine derivative with serotonin transporter inhibitory activity and 5-HT
AID1302248Inhibition of GRK2 in C57BL/6 mouse cardiomyocytes assessed as increase in contractility at 10 uM preincubated for 10 mins followed by beta adrenergic receptor agonist isoproterenol addition for 2 mins2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 04-28, Volume: 59, Issue:8
Structure-Based Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Highly Selective and Potent G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 Inhibitors.
AID311934Dissociation constant, pKa of the compound2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-24, Volume: 51, Issue:2
Identification of new functional inhibitors of acid sphingomyelinase using a structure-property-activity relation model.
AID496819Antimicrobial activity against Plasmodium falciparum2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID588212Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID588215FDA HLAED, alkaline phosphatase increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID1079945Animal toxicity known. [column 'TOXIC' in source]
AID539464Solubility of the compound in 0.1 M phosphate buffer at 600 uM at pH 7.4 after 24 hrs by LC/MS/MS analysis2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-15, Volume: 20, Issue:24
Experimental solubility profiling of marketed CNS drugs, exploring solubility limit of CNS discovery candidate.
AID588213Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in non-rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID496823Antimicrobial activity against Trichomonas vaginalis2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID616837Anti-depressant activity in mouse assessed as immobility effect at 10 mg/kg, po after 60 mins by forced swimming test2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-22, Volume: 54, Issue:18
Design and synthesis of novel arylpiperazine derivatives containing the imidazole core targeting 5-HT(2A) receptor and 5-HT transporter.
AID26362Ionization constant (pKa)2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Prediction of human volume of distribution values for neutral and basic drugs. 2. Extended data set and leave-class-out statistics.
AID1460843Inhibition of bovine GRK2 S670A mutant after 5 mins in presence of ATP by phosphorimaging assay2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 04-13, Volume: 60, Issue:7
Structure-Based Design of Highly Selective and Potent G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 Inhibitors Based on Paroxetine.
AID29359Ionization constant (pKa)2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 43, Issue:13
QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
AID588214FDA HLAED, liver enzyme composite activity2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID503311Antiproliferative activity against human PC3 cells at 10 uM after 120 hrs by MTT assay relative to DMSO2006Nature chemical biology, Jun, Volume: 2, Issue:6
Identifying off-target effects and hidden phenotypes of drugs in human cells.
AID1302237Inhibition of full length C-terminal hexahistidine tagged GRK2 (unknown origin) S670A mutant expressed in High Five cells using Bac to Bac insect cell expression system using tubulin as substrate by SDS-PAGE method2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 04-28, Volume: 59, Issue:8
Structure-Based Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Highly Selective and Potent G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 Inhibitors.
AID373224Cmin in human at 20 mg, po qd for 10 days2007Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Nov, Volume: 51, Issue:11
Interaction study of the combined use of paroxetine and fosamprenavir-ritonavir in healthy subjects.
AID1222793Dissociation constant, pKa of the compound2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, May, Volume: 41, Issue:5
Which metabolites circulate?
AID1446226Inhibition of recombinant MPO (unknown origin) assessed as reduction in taurine chloramine production preincubated with enzyme and taurine followed by H2O2 addition measured after 5 mins2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 08-10, Volume: 60, Issue:15
Discovery of Novel Potent Reversible and Irreversible Myeloperoxidase Inhibitors Using Virtual Screening Procedure.
AID204516The potency of the [3H]paroxetine for 5-HT transporters1994Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-29, Volume: 37, Issue:9
Synthesis of 2 beta-acyl-3 beta-aryl-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octanes and their binding affinities at dopamine and serotonin transport sites in rat striatum and frontal cortex.
AID699540Inhibition of human liver OATP1B3 expressed in HEK293 Flp-In cells assessed as reduction in [3H]E17-betaG uptake at 20 uM incubated for 5 mins by scintillation counting2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-24, Volume: 55, Issue:10
Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
AID678713Inhibition of human CYP2C9 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using 7-methoxy-4-trifluoromethylcoumarin-3-acetic acid as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID373226Apparent oral clearance in human at 20 mg, po qd for 10 days2007Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Nov, Volume: 51, Issue:11
Interaction study of the combined use of paroxetine and fosamprenavir-ritonavir in healthy subjects.
AID1079934Highest frequency of acute liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% AIGUE' in source]
AID587251Displacement of [3H]-WIN 35,428 from DAT in rabbit striatal membrane2011European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 46, Issue:3
Synthesis, molecular docking and binding studies of selective serotonin transporter inhibitors.
AID612589Antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus 1199B norA++ and A116E GrlA mutation by M7-A7 CLSI microdilution method2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-25, Volume: 54, Issue:16
Evolution from a natural flavones nucleus to obtain 2-(4-Propoxyphenyl)quinoline derivatives as potent inhibitors of the S. aureus NorA efflux pump.
AID588217FDA HLAED, serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID625284Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic failure2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID681144TP_TRANSPORTER: cell accumulation of calcein in L-MDR1 cells2003The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, Apr, Volume: 305, Issue:1
Inhibition of P-glycoprotein by newer antidepressants.
AID1449985Inhibition of RND efflux pump in Enterobacter cloacae isolate 117029 assessed as potentiation of minocycline-induced antibacterial activity at 8 ug/ml after 18 to 24 hrs by microbroth dilution assay2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-11, Volume: 60, Issue:9
A Tobramycin Vector Enhances Synergy and Efficacy of Efflux Pump Inhibitors against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria.
AID588219FDA HLAED, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID1866614Inhibition of human Kv1.3 expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as inhibition of tetracyclin induced current at 30 uM at holding potential of -80 mV by patch clamp method relative to control2022Journal of natural products, 04-22, Volume: 85, Issue:4
Jatrophane Diterpenoids with Kv1.3 Ion Channel Inhibitory Effects from
AID254338Binding inhibition towards human norepinephrine transporter2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-22, Volume: 48, Issue:19
Conformationally restricted homotryptamines. 2. Indole cyclopropylmethylamines as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
AID1079932Highest frequency of moderate liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% BIOL' in source]
AID781328pKa (acid-base dissociation constant) as determined by Luan ref: Pharm. Res. 20052014Pharmaceutical research, Apr, Volume: 31, Issue:4
Comparison of the accuracy of experimental and predicted pKa values of basic and acidic compounds.
AID1302252Selectivity ratio of IC50 for C-terminal hexahistidine tagged bovine GRK1 to IC50 for human GRK2 S670A mutant2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 04-28, Volume: 59, Issue:8
Structure-Based Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Highly Selective and Potent G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 Inhibitors.
AID1220556Fraction unbound in CD-1 mouse brain homogenates at 1 uM after 6 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Species independence in brain tissue binding using brain homogenates.
AID739022Displacement of [125I]RTI-55 from human recombinant SERT expressed in HEK293 cells after 1 hr by scintillation counting analysis2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Apr-15, Volume: 21, Issue:8
Discovery of disubstituted piperidines and homopiperidines as potent dual NK1 receptor antagonists-serotonin reuptake transporter inhibitors for the treatment of depression.
AID1866613Cytotoxicity against HEK293 cells assessed as reduction in cell proliferation at 30 uM2022Journal of natural products, 04-22, Volume: 85, Issue:4
Jatrophane Diterpenoids with Kv1.3 Ion Channel Inhibitory Effects from
AID1866612Inhibition of human Kv1.3 expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as inhibition of tetracyclin induced current at holding potential of -80 mV by patch clamp method2022Journal of natural products, 04-22, Volume: 85, Issue:4
Jatrophane Diterpenoids with Kv1.3 Ion Channel Inhibitory Effects from
AID1220560Fraction unbound in human occipital cortex at 1 uM after 6 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Species independence in brain tissue binding using brain homogenates.
AID27167Delta logD (logD6.5 - logD7.4)2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 43, Issue:13
QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
AID1474167Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring verified drug-induced liver injury concern status2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID361596Displacement of [3H]paroxetine from human SERT expressed in HEK293 cells2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-15, Volume: 18, Issue:16
3-(4-(6-Fluoroalkoxy-3,4-dihydroisoquinoline-2(1H)-yl)cyclohexyl)-1H-indole-5-carbonitriles for SERT imaging: chemical synthesis, evaluation in vitro and radiofluorination.
AID496821Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID8002Observed volume of distribution2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Prediction of human volume of distribution values for neutral and basic drugs. 2. Extended data set and leave-class-out statistics.
AID612586Antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus K1902 bearing norA-deficient mutation by M7-A7 CLSI microdilution method2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-25, Volume: 54, Issue:16
Evolution from a natural flavones nucleus to obtain 2-(4-Propoxyphenyl)quinoline derivatives as potent inhibitors of the S. aureus NorA efflux pump.
AID373239Decrease in serotonin concentration in human platelets at 20 mg, po qd for 10 days followed by 16 days washout period and treated with 20 mg, po qd for 10 days coadministered with fosamprenavir at 700 mg, po bid and ritonavir at 100 mg, po bid relative to2007Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Nov, Volume: 51, Issue:11
Interaction study of the combined use of paroxetine and fosamprenavir-ritonavir in healthy subjects.
AID1215122Percentage unbound in solid supported porcine brain membrane vesicles at 5 uM by TRANSIL assay2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 39, Issue:2
Brain tissue binding of drugs: evaluation and validation of solid supported porcine brain membrane vesicles (TRANSIL) as a novel high-throughput method.
AID1460847Inhibition of ROCK1 (unknown origin) at 10 uM by ADP-Glo kinase assay2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 04-13, Volume: 60, Issue:7
Structure-Based Design of Highly Selective and Potent G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 Inhibitors Based on Paroxetine.
AID1129361Unbound fraction in HEK293 cell homogenate at 0.1 uM by equilibrium dialysis based UPLC-MS/MS analysis2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-10, Volume: 57, Issue:7
A high-throughput cell-based method to predict the unbound drug fraction in the brain.
AID395324Lipophilicity, log D at pH 7.4 by liquid chromatography2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-26, Volume: 52, Issue:6
Relationship between brain tissue partitioning and microemulsion retention factors of CNS drugs.
AID1460846Inhibition of mouse PKA using CREBtide as substrate after 30 mins in presence of ATP by ADP-Glo kinase assay2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 04-13, Volume: 60, Issue:7
Structure-Based Design of Highly Selective and Potent G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 Inhibitors Based on Paroxetine.
AID669748Inhibition of norA in wild type Staphylococcus aureus SA1199 expressing assessed as potentiation of ciprofloxacin MIC by checkerboard assay2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-12, Volume: 55, Issue:7
Pyrazolo[4,3-c][1,2]benzothiazines 5,5-dioxide: a promising new class of Staphylococcus aureus NorA efflux pump inhibitors.
AID625287Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatomegaly2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID669749Inhibition of norA overexpressed in Staphylococcus aureus SA1199B coexpressing A116E GrlA mutation assessed as potentiation of ciprofloxacin MIC by checkerboard assay2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-12, Volume: 55, Issue:7
Pyrazolo[4,3-c][1,2]benzothiazines 5,5-dioxide: a promising new class of Staphylococcus aureus NorA efflux pump inhibitors.
AID1079948Times to onset, minimal and maximal, observed in the indexed observations. [column 'DELAI' in source]
AID65494Inhibitory constant towards reuptake of [125I]-12 from dopamine transporter in rat striatal membranes1994Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-13, Volume: 37, Issue:10
Synthesis and characterization of radioiodinated N-(3-iodopropen-1-yl)-2 beta-carbomethoxy-3 beta-(4-chlorophenyl)tropanes: potential dopamine reuptake site imaging agents.
AID612583Inhibition of NorA in Staphylococcus aureus 1199B assessed as inhibition of ethidium bromide efflux at 50 uM by fluorimetry2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-25, Volume: 54, Issue:16
Evolution from a natural flavones nucleus to obtain 2-(4-Propoxyphenyl)quinoline derivatives as potent inhibitors of the S. aureus NorA efflux pump.
AID28681Partition coefficient (logD6.5)2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 43, Issue:13
QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
AID625285Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic necrosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID373242Apparent volume of distribution in human2007Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Nov, Volume: 51, Issue:11
Interaction study of the combined use of paroxetine and fosamprenavir-ritonavir in healthy subjects.
AID625277FDA Liver Toxicity Knowledge Base Benchmark Dataset (LTKB-BD) drugs of less concern for DILI2011Drug discovery today, Aug, Volume: 16, Issue:15-16
FDA-approved drug labeling for the study of drug-induced liver injury.
AID1449983Inhibition of RND efflux pump in Enterobacter cloacae isolate 117029 assessed as potentiation of minocycline-induced antibacterial activity by measuring minocycline MIC at 8 ug/ml after 18 to 24 hrs by microbroth dilution assay (Rvb = 128 to 256 ug/ml)2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-11, Volume: 60, Issue:9
A Tobramycin Vector Enhances Synergy and Efficacy of Efflux Pump Inhibitors against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria.
AID330659Effect on life span of Caenorhabditis elegans at 50 uM2007Nature, Nov-22, Volume: 450, Issue:7169
An antidepressant that extends lifespan in adult Caenorhabditis elegans.
AID709133Antagonist activity at rat P2X4 receptor by cell-based calcium influx assay2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-26, Volume: 55, Issue:22
N-substituted phenoxazine and acridone derivatives: structure-activity relationships of potent P2X4 receptor antagonists.
AID1460852Half life in CD-1 mouse liver microsomes at 1 uM measured up to 60 mins in presence of NADPH by LC-MS/MS analysis2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 04-13, Volume: 60, Issue:7
Structure-Based Design of Highly Selective and Potent G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 Inhibitors Based on Paroxetine.
AID709142Antagonist activity at human P2X4 receptor expressed in 1321N1 cells assessed as inhibition of ATP-induced cytosolic calcium influx compound preincubated for 30 mins before ATP treatment by Fluo-4 AM fluorescence method2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-26, Volume: 55, Issue:22
N-substituted phenoxazine and acridone derivatives: structure-activity relationships of potent P2X4 receptor antagonists.
AID496828Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania donovani2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID1079933Acute liver toxicity defined via clinical observations and clear clinical-chemistry results: serum ALT or AST activity > 6 N or serum alkaline phosphatases activity > 1.7 N. This category includes cytolytic, choleostatic and mixed liver toxicity. Value is
AID1449968Inhibition of RND efflux pump in XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate P262-101856 infected in Galleria mellonella assessed as potentiation of minocycline-induced antibacterial activity by measuring larval death rate at 75 mg/kg co-treated with 75 mg/kg mino2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-11, Volume: 60, Issue:9
A Tobramycin Vector Enhances Synergy and Efficacy of Efflux Pump Inhibitors against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria.
AID1220558Fraction unbound in Beagle dog brain homogenates at 1 uM after 6 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Species independence in brain tissue binding using brain homogenates.
AID179990Tested in vivo for serotonin syndrome antagonizing activity in rat1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 33, Issue:10
Pyrroloisoquinoline antidepressants. 3. A focus on serotonin.
AID1079937Severe hepatitis, defined as possibly life-threatening liver failure or through clinical observations. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'MASS' in source]
AID496829Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania infantum2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID1636371Drug activation in human Hep3B cells assessed as human CYP3A4-mediated drug metabolism-induced cytotoxicity measured as decrease in cell viability at 21.7 uM pre-incubated with BSO for 18 hrs followed by incubation with compound for 3 hrs in presence of N2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 26, Issue:16
Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
AID1079942Steatosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'STEAT' in source]
AID395327Dissociation constant, pKa by capillary electrophoresis2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-26, Volume: 52, Issue:6
Relationship between brain tissue partitioning and microemulsion retention factors of CNS drugs.
AID1460845Inhibition of bovine GRK5 after 5 mins after 5 mins in presence of ATP by phosphorimaging assay2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 04-13, Volume: 60, Issue:7
Structure-Based Design of Highly Selective and Potent G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 Inhibitors Based on Paroxetine.
AID1847246Antiviral activity against Ebola virus infected in African green monkey assessed as reduction in viral infection incubated for 48 hrs by CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay2021European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-05, Volume: 223Potential pharmacological strategies targeting the Niemann-Pick C1 receptor and Ebola virus glycoprotein interaction.
AID1220555Fraction unbound in Sprague-Dawley rat brain homogenates at 1 uM after 6 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Species independence in brain tissue binding using brain homogenates.
AID1894055Inhibition of GRK2 (unknown origin)2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-11, Volume: 64, Issue:3
Small-Molecule Kinase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Nononcologic Diseases.
AID373229Half life in human at 20 mg, po qd for 10 days followed by 16 days washout period and treated with 20 mg, po qd for 10 days coadministered with fosamprenavir at 700 mg, po bid and ritonavir at 100 mg, po bid2007Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Nov, Volume: 51, Issue:11
Interaction study of the combined use of paroxetine and fosamprenavir-ritonavir in healthy subjects.
AID669742Inhibition of norA-mediated EtBr efflux in Staphylococcus aureus SA1199B overexpressing norA and expressing A116E GrlA mutation at 50 uM by fluorometry2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-12, Volume: 55, Issue:7
Pyrazolo[4,3-c][1,2]benzothiazines 5,5-dioxide: a promising new class of Staphylococcus aureus NorA efflux pump inhibitors.
AID625288Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for jaundice2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID612588Antibacterial activity against wild-type norA expressing Staphylococcus aureus 1199 by M7-A7 CLSI microdilution method2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-25, Volume: 54, Issue:16
Evolution from a natural flavones nucleus to obtain 2-(4-Propoxyphenyl)quinoline derivatives as potent inhibitors of the S. aureus NorA efflux pump.
AID1079946Presence of at least one case with successful reintroduction. [column 'REINT' in source]
AID678717Inhibition of human CYP3A4 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using 7-benzyloxyquinoline as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID1211295Unbound fraction in plasma (unknown origin) at pH 7.63 after 6 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method in presence of 5% CO22011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Mar, Volume: 39, Issue:3
Control and measurement of plasma pH in equilibrium dialysis: influence on drug plasma protein binding.
AID678715Inhibition of human CYP2D6 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using 4-methylaminoethyl-7-methoxycoumarin as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID540211Fraction unbound in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID540212Mean residence time in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID134216Tested in vitro for norepinephrine (NE) neuronal uptake inhibition1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 33, Issue:10
Pyrroloisoquinoline antidepressants. 3. A focus on serotonin.
AID588216FDA HLAED, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID587249Displacement of [3H]-paroxetine from SERT in rabbit cortical membrane2011European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 46, Issue:3
Synthesis, molecular docking and binding studies of selective serotonin transporter inhibitors.
AID625283Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for elevated liver function tests2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID612590Potentiation of ciprofloxacin-antibacterial activity against wild-type Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 assessed as reduction in ciprofloxacin MIC by M7-A7 CLSI microdilution method2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-25, Volume: 54, Issue:16
Evolution from a natural flavones nucleus to obtain 2-(4-Propoxyphenyl)quinoline derivatives as potent inhibitors of the S. aureus NorA efflux pump.
AID408802Displacement of [3H]paroxetine from human SERT expressed in HEK293 cells2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jun-15, Volume: 16, Issue:12
Carbon-11 labeled indolylpropylamine analog as a new potential PET agent for imaging of the serotonin transporter.
AID612612Inhibition of NorA in Staphylococcus aureus 1199B norA++ and A116E GrlA mutation assessed as reduction in ciprofloxacin MIC at 25 ug/mL2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-25, Volume: 54, Issue:16
Evolution from a natural flavones nucleus to obtain 2-(4-Propoxyphenyl)quinoline derivatives as potent inhibitors of the S. aureus NorA efflux pump.
AID625291Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver function tests abnormal2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1211294Unbound fraction in plasma (unknown origin) at pH 7.4 after 6 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method in presence of 5% CO22011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Mar, Volume: 39, Issue:3
Control and measurement of plasma pH in equilibrium dialysis: influence on drug plasma protein binding.
AID1211297Drug recovery in plasma (unknown origin)2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Mar, Volume: 39, Issue:3
Control and measurement of plasma pH in equilibrium dialysis: influence on drug plasma protein binding.
AID425652Total body clearance in human2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 52, Issue:15
Physicochemical determinants of human renal clearance.
AID1215121Fraction unbound in Wistar rat brain homogenate at 5 uM after 5 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 39, Issue:2
Brain tissue binding of drugs: evaluation and validation of solid supported porcine brain membrane vesicles (TRANSIL) as a novel high-throughput method.
AID205038Inhibition of [3H]paroxetine (0.2 nM) binding to 5-HT transporter1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-15, Volume: 41, Issue:2
Synthesis and ligand binding of tropane ring analogues of paroxetine.
AID540209Volume of distribution at steady state in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1302253Selectivity ratio of IC50 for C-terminal hexahistidine tagged bovine GRK5 to IC50 for human GRK2 S670A mutant2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 04-28, Volume: 59, Issue:8
Structure-Based Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Highly Selective and Potent G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 Inhibitors.
AID1450006Inhibition of RND efflux pump in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 assessed as increase in tetracycline uptake up to 8.2 ug/ml measured at 1 min interval for 30 mins by fluorescence assay2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-11, Volume: 60, Issue:9
A Tobramycin Vector Enhances Synergy and Efficacy of Efflux Pump Inhibitors against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria.
AID1079940Granulomatous liver disease, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'GRAN' in source]
AID1636427Drug activation in human Hep3B cells assessed as human CYP2D6-mediated drug metabolism-induced cytotoxicity measured as decrease in cell viability at 13 uM pre-incubated with BSO for 18 hrs followed by incubation with compound for 3 hrs in presence of NAD2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 26, Issue:16
Development of a cell viability assay to assess drug metabolite structure-toxicity relationships.
AID230244Ratio of NET to that of SERT2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-04, Volume: 46, Issue:25
Syntheses and binding studies of new [(aryl)(aryloxy)methyl]piperidine derivatives and related compounds as potential antidepressant drugs with high affinity for serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) transporters.
AID1064727Antagonist activity at human P2X4 receptor expressed in human 1321N1 cells assessed as inhibition of ATP-induced cytosolic calcium influx preincubated for 30 mins followed by ATP addition by Fluo-4 AM dye-based fluorescence assay2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-01, Volume: 22, Issue:3
Carbamazepine derivatives with P2X4 receptor-blocking activity.
AID554098Inhibition of NorA in Staphylococcus aureus 1199B assessed as reduction in ethidium bromide efflux at 50 uM by fluorimetry after 5 mins2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-13, Volume: 54, Issue:1
Discovery of novel inhibitors of the NorA multidrug transporter of Staphylococcus aureus.
AID612585Antibacterial activity against wild-type Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 by M7-A7 CLSI microdilution method2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-25, Volume: 54, Issue:16
Evolution from a natural flavones nucleus to obtain 2-(4-Propoxyphenyl)quinoline derivatives as potent inhibitors of the S. aureus NorA efflux pump.
AID1079947Comments (NB not yet translated). [column 'COMMENTAIRES' in source]
AID64685Binding affinity against dopamine transporter (DAT) by displacement of [3H]WIN-35428 in male wistar rats2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-04, Volume: 46, Issue:25
Syntheses and binding studies of new [(aryl)(aryloxy)methyl]piperidine derivatives and related compounds as potential antidepressant drugs with high affinity for serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) transporters.
AID186981Inhibition of [3H]5-HT reuptake into rat frontal cortex synaptosomes1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-03, Volume: 8, Issue:5
Synthesis of a potent wide-spectrum serotonin-, norepinephrine-, dopamine-reuptake inhibitor (SNDRI) and a species-selective dopamine-reuptake inhibitor based on the gamma-amino alcohol functional group.
AID1332036Displacement of [3H]citalopram from human SERT expressed in HEK293 cell membranes after 1 hr by liquid scintillation counting method2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 01-01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Discovery of SMP-304, a novel benzylpiperidine derivative with serotonin transporter inhibitory activity and 5-HT
AID1460855Inhibition of GRK2 in isoproterenol-stimulated C57/BL6 mouse cardiomyocytes assessed as increase in contractility by measuring cell shortening at 10 uM pretreated for 10 mins followed by beta-AR agonist isoproterenol addition for 2 mins2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 04-13, Volume: 60, Issue:7
Structure-Based Design of Highly Selective and Potent G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 Inhibitors Based on Paroxetine.
AID1449929Inhibition of RND efflux pump in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 assessed as potentiation of minocycline-induced antibacterial activity by measuring minocycline MIC at 8 ug/ml after 18 to 24 hrs by microbroth dilution assay (Rvb = 8 ug/ml)2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-11, Volume: 60, Issue:9
A Tobramycin Vector Enhances Synergy and Efficacy of Efflux Pump Inhibitors against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria.
AID1220559Fraction unbound in cynomolgus monkey brain homogenates at 1 uM after 6 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Species independence in brain tissue binding using brain homogenates.
AID186980Inhibition of [3H]- NE reuptake into rat hippocampal synaptosomes1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-03, Volume: 8, Issue:5
Synthesis of a potent wide-spectrum serotonin-, norepinephrine-, dopamine-reuptake inhibitor (SNDRI) and a species-selective dopamine-reuptake inhibitor based on the gamma-amino alcohol functional group.
AID204695Displacement of [3H]citalopram from rat cortical serotonin transporter (SERT)2002Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-11, Volume: 12, Issue:5
Syntheses and binding affinities of 6-nitroquipazine analogues for serotonin transporter. Part 2: 4-substituted 6-nitroquipazines.
AID1332031Antidepressant-like activity in Wistar rat assessed as decrease in immobility time at 3 and 10 mg/kg, po administered 30 mins post start of training session for 2 days measured 2 hrs post last dose by forced swimming test2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 01-01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Discovery of SMP-304, a novel benzylpiperidine derivative with serotonin transporter inhibitory activity and 5-HT
AID589095Mechanism based inhibition of human cytochrome P450 2D6 measured by dextromethorphan O-demethylation2005Current drug metabolism, Oct, Volume: 6, Issue:5
Cytochrome p450 enzymes mechanism based inhibitors: common sub-structures and reactivity.
AID1212341Cytotoxicity against human Fa2N-4 cells by lactate dehydrogenase assay2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Apr, Volume: 41, Issue:4
Lysosomal sequestration (trapping) of lipophilic amine (cationic amphiphilic) drugs in immortalized human hepatocytes (Fa2N-4 cells).
AID1302238Inhibition of GRK1 (unknown origin) using tubulin as substrate by SDS-PAGE method2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 04-28, Volume: 59, Issue:8
Structure-Based Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Highly Selective and Potent G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 Inhibitors.
AID625281Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholelithiasis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1863562Antiviral activity against pseudotyped Ebola virus assessed as inhibition of viral entry2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-05, Volume: 240Discovery of potent ebola entry inhibitors with (3S,4aS,8aS)-2-(3-amino-2-hydroxypropyl) decahydroisoquinoline-3-carboxamide scaffold.
AID227282Effect on helpless behavior in rats and the number of escape failures was determined in shuttle-box session-1 (SB-1) at 1 mg/kg dose2001Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-01, Volume: 44, Issue:3
New 1-aryl-3-(4-arylpiperazin-1-yl)propane derivatives, with dual action at 5-HT1A serotonin receptors and serotonin transporter, as a new class of antidepressants.
AID1472913Binding affinity to Ebola virus Zaire Mayinga-76 recombinant GP protein assessed as change in melting temperature at 500 uM by SYPRO orange dye-based fluorescence assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-08, Volume: 61, Issue:3
Target Identification and Mode of Action of Four Chemically Divergent Drugs against Ebolavirus Infection.
AID496824Antimicrobial activity against Toxoplasma gondii2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID1079931Moderate liver toxicity, defined via clinical-chemistry results: ALT or AST serum activity 6 times the normal upper limit (N) or alkaline phosphatase serum activity of 1.7 N. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'BIOL' in source]
AID625292Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) combined score2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID373240Toxicity in human assessed as serious adverse events at 20 mg, po qd for 10 days2007Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Nov, Volume: 51, Issue:11
Interaction study of the combined use of paroxetine and fosamprenavir-ritonavir in healthy subjects.
AID3719Binding affinity against 5-hydroxytryptamine 1A receptor (5-HT1A) by displacement of [3H]8-OH-DPAT from rat hippocampus membranes2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-04, Volume: 46, Issue:25
Syntheses and binding studies of new [(aryl)(aryloxy)methyl]piperidine derivatives and related compounds as potential antidepressant drugs with high affinity for serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) transporters.
AID678712Inhibition of human CYP1A2 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using ethoxyresorufin as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID1079936Choleostatic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is < 2 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHOLE' in source]
AID5476Binding affinity against 5-hydroxytryptamine 2A receptor by displacement of [3H]-ketanserin from rat prefrontal cerebral cortex mambranes2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-04, Volume: 46, Issue:25
Syntheses and binding studies of new [(aryl)(aryloxy)methyl]piperidine derivatives and related compounds as potential antidepressant drugs with high affinity for serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) transporters.
AID587252Ratio of Ki for NET in rabbit cortical membrane to Ki for SERT in rabbit cortical membrane2011European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 46, Issue:3
Synthesis, molecular docking and binding studies of selective serotonin transporter inhibitors.
AID625290Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver fatty2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1783171Displacement of [125I]RTI55 binding from human wild type SERT2021European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-05, Volume: 220Tuning the activity of known drugs via the introduction of halogen atoms, a case study of SERT ligands - Fluoxetine and fluvoxamine.
AID1460842Inhibition of GRK2 (unknown origin)2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 04-13, Volume: 60, Issue:7
Structure-Based Design of Highly Selective and Potent G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 Inhibitors Based on Paroxetine.
AID373227AUC (0 to 24 hrs) in human at 20 mg, po qd for 10 days followed by 16 days washout period and treated with 20 mg, po qd for 10 days coadministered with fosamprenavir at 700 mg, po bid and ritonavir at 100 mg, po bid2007Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Nov, Volume: 51, Issue:11
Interaction study of the combined use of paroxetine and fosamprenavir-ritonavir in healthy subjects.
AID1079939Cirrhosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CIRRH' in source]
AID438555Binding affinity to 5HT1A receptor2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-08, Volume: 52, Issue:19
Physical binding pocket induction for affinity prediction.
AID588211Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in humans2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID373241Toxicity in human assessed as serious adverse events at 20 mg, po qd for 10 days followed by 16 days washout period and treated with 20 mg, po qd for 10 days coadministered with fosamprenavir at 700 mg, po bid and ritonavir at 100 mg, po bid2007Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Nov, Volume: 51, Issue:11
Interaction study of the combined use of paroxetine and fosamprenavir-ritonavir in healthy subjects.
AID1211296Unbound fraction in plasma (unknown origin) under normal atmospheric condition at pH 7.72 after 6 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Mar, Volume: 39, Issue:3
Control and measurement of plasma pH in equilibrium dialysis: influence on drug plasma protein binding.
AID699539Inhibition of human liver OATP1B1 expressed in HEK293 Flp-In cells assessed as reduction in E17-betaG uptake at 20 uM by scintillation counting2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-24, Volume: 55, Issue:10
Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
AID1460844Inhibition of bovine GRK1 (1 to 535 residues) after 5 mins after 5 mins in presence of ATP by phosphorimaging assay2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 04-13, Volume: 60, Issue:7
Structure-Based Design of Highly Selective and Potent G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 Inhibitors Based on Paroxetine.
AID1079943Malignant tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.MAL' in source]
AID1215126Ratio of fraction unbound in Wistar rat brain homogenate at 5 uM after 5 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method to fraction unbound in solid supported porcine brain membrane vesicles at 5 uM by TRANSIL assay2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 39, Issue:2
Brain tissue binding of drugs: evaluation and validation of solid supported porcine brain membrane vesicles (TRANSIL) as a novel high-throughput method.
AID699541Inhibition of human liver OATP2B1 expressed in HEK293 Flp-In cells assessed as reduction in [3H]E3S uptake at 20 uM incubated for 5 mins by scintillation counting2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-24, Volume: 55, Issue:10
Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
AID625282Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cirrhosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID387488Inhibition of serotonin uptake at human SERT expressed in JAR cells2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-15, Volume: 18, Issue:18
Synthesis and activity of 1-(3-amino-1-phenylpropyl)indolin-2-ones: a new class of selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors.
AID496825Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania mexicana2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID373238Decrease in serotonin concentration in human platelets at 20 mg, po qd for 10 days relative to control2007Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Nov, Volume: 51, Issue:11
Interaction study of the combined use of paroxetine and fosamprenavir-ritonavir in healthy subjects.
AID36948Ability to displace [3H]rauwolscine from Alpha-2 adrenergic receptor in rat cortical membranes1997Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-28, Volume: 40, Issue:7
Structure-activity studies for a novel series of N-(arylethyl)-N-(1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalen-1-ylmethyl)-N-methylamine s possessing dual 5-HT uptake inhibiting and alpha2-antagonistic activities.
AID144700Noncompetitive inhibition of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) Receptor, by the displacement of [3H]MK-801 in rat brain membranes; nd means not determined1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-03, Volume: 8, Issue:5
Synthesis of a potent wide-spectrum serotonin-, norepinephrine-, dopamine-reuptake inhibitor (SNDRI) and a species-selective dopamine-reuptake inhibitor based on the gamma-amino alcohol functional group.
AID496832Antimicrobial activity against Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID408801Displacement of [3H]citalopram from human SERT expressed in HEK293 cells2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jun-15, Volume: 16, Issue:12
Carbon-11 labeled indolylpropylamine analog as a new potential PET agent for imaging of the serotonin transporter.
AID330665Effect on life span of Caenorhabditis elegans at 250 uM2007Nature, Nov-22, Volume: 450, Issue:7169
An antidepressant that extends lifespan in adult Caenorhabditis elegans.
AID678722Covalent binding affinity to human liver microsomes assessed per mg of protein at 10 uM after 60 mins presence of NADPH2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID669745Antibacterial activity against wild type Staphylococcus aureus SA1199 expressing norA by microdilution method2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-12, Volume: 55, Issue:7
Pyrazolo[4,3-c][1,2]benzothiazines 5,5-dioxide: a promising new class of Staphylococcus aureus NorA efflux pump inhibitors.
AID588210Human drug-induced liver injury (DILI) modelling dataset from Ekins et al2010Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Dec, Volume: 38, Issue:12
A predictive ligand-based Bayesian model for human drug-induced liver injury.
AID1449982Inhibition of RND efflux pump in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate 116381 assessed as potentiation of minocycline-induced antibacterial activity by measuring minocycline MIC at 8 ug/ml after 18 to 24 hrs by microbroth dilution assay (Rvb = 128 ug/ml)2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-11, Volume: 60, Issue:9
A Tobramycin Vector Enhances Synergy and Efficacy of Efflux Pump Inhibitors against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria.
AID186979Inhibition of [3H]- DA reuptake into rat striatal synaptosomes1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-03, Volume: 8, Issue:5
Synthesis of a potent wide-spectrum serotonin-, norepinephrine-, dopamine-reuptake inhibitor (SNDRI) and a species-selective dopamine-reuptake inhibitor based on the gamma-amino alcohol functional group.
AID1079941Liver damage due to vascular disease: peliosis hepatitis, hepatic veno-occlusive disease, Budd-Chiari syndrome. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'VASC' in source]
AID1212314Drug uptake in lysosomes of human Fa2N-4 cells assessed as inhibition of LysoTracker Red fluorescence after 30 mins2013Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Apr, Volume: 41, Issue:4
Lysosomal sequestration (trapping) of lipophilic amine (cationic amphiphilic) drugs in immortalized human hepatocytes (Fa2N-4 cells).
AID587253Ratio of Ki for DAT in rabbit striatal membrane to Ki for SERT in rabbit cortical membrane2011European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 46, Issue:3
Synthesis, molecular docking and binding studies of selective serotonin transporter inhibitors.
AID678716Inhibition of human CYP3A4 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using diethoxyfluorescein as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID612584Antibacterial activity against NorA-expressing Staphylococcus aureus 1199B by M7-A7 CLSI microdilution method2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-25, Volume: 54, Issue:16
Evolution from a natural flavones nucleus to obtain 2-(4-Propoxyphenyl)quinoline derivatives as potent inhibitors of the S. aureus NorA efflux pump.
AID1472911Antiviral activity against Ebolavirus infected in african green monkey Vero E6 cells assessed as reduction in virus entry after 48 hrs by by Celltiter-Glo luminescent assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-08, Volume: 61, Issue:3
Target Identification and Mode of Action of Four Chemically Divergent Drugs against Ebolavirus Infection.
AID625279Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for bilirubinemia2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625286Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID204534Binding affinity to the serotonin transporter (SERT) measured by displacement of [3H]paroxetine in male wistar rats2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-04, Volume: 46, Issue:25
Syntheses and binding studies of new [(aryl)(aryloxy)methyl]piperidine derivatives and related compounds as potential antidepressant drugs with high affinity for serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) transporters.
AID395325Lipophilicity, log P by microemulsion electrokinetic chromatography2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-26, Volume: 52, Issue:6
Relationship between brain tissue partitioning and microemulsion retention factors of CNS drugs.
AID64686Displacement of [3H]WIN-35428(0.5 nM) from Dopamine transporter1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-15, Volume: 41, Issue:2
Synthesis and ligand binding of tropane ring analogues of paroxetine.
AID1211293Unbound fraction in plasma (unknown origin) under normal atmospheric condition at pH 7.22 after 6 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Mar, Volume: 39, Issue:3
Control and measurement of plasma pH in equilibrium dialysis: influence on drug plasma protein binding.
AID425653Renal clearance in human2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 52, Issue:15
Physicochemical determinants of human renal clearance.
AID1220557Fraction unbound in Hartley guinea pig brain homogenates at 1 uM after 6 hrs by equilibrium dialysis method2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 39, Issue:7
Species independence in brain tissue binding using brain homogenates.
AID387487Inhibition of norepinephrine uptake at human NET expressed in MDCK cells2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-15, Volume: 18, Issue:18
Synthesis and activity of 1-(3-amino-1-phenylpropyl)indolin-2-ones: a new class of selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors.
AID227285Effect on helpless behavior in rats and the number of escape failures was determined in shuttle-box session-2 (SB-2) at 1 mg/kg dose2001Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-01, Volume: 44, Issue:3
New 1-aryl-3-(4-arylpiperazin-1-yl)propane derivatives, with dual action at 5-HT1A serotonin receptors and serotonin transporter, as a new class of antidepressants.
AID669744Antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus SA1199B overexpressing norA and expressing A116E GrlA mutation by microdilution method2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-12, Volume: 55, Issue:7
Pyrazolo[4,3-c][1,2]benzothiazines 5,5-dioxide: a promising new class of Staphylococcus aureus NorA efflux pump inhibitors.
AID1449987Antibacterial activity against Enterobacter cloacae isolate 117029 after 18 to 24 hrs by microbroth dilution assay2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-11, Volume: 60, Issue:9
A Tobramycin Vector Enhances Synergy and Efficacy of Efflux Pump Inhibitors against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria.
AID587250Displacement of [3H]-Nisoxetine from NET in rabbit cortical membrane2011European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 46, Issue:3
Synthesis, molecular docking and binding studies of selective serotonin transporter inhibitors.
AID496820Antimicrobial activity against Trypanosoma brucei2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID227289Effect on helpless behavior in rats and the number of escape failures was determined in shuttle-box session-3 (SB-3) at 1 mg/kg dose2001Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-01, Volume: 44, Issue:3
New 1-aryl-3-(4-arylpiperazin-1-yl)propane derivatives, with dual action at 5-HT1A serotonin receptors and serotonin transporter, as a new class of antidepressants.
AID314312Inhibition of NorA-mediated efflux in Staphylococcus aureus K23612008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-15, Volume: 18, Issue:4
Synthesis and evaluation of PSSRI-based inhibitors of Staphylococcus aureus multidrug efflux pumps.
AID1698791Binding affinity to full length human GRK2 by Thermofluor thermal shift assay2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 12-01, Volume: 30, Issue:23
Hit-to-lead optimization and discovery of a potent, and orally bioavailable G protein coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) inhibitor.
AID204703Inhibition of [3H]citalopram binding to Serotonin transporter of rat cerebral cortex2000Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-17, Volume: 10, Issue:14
Syntheses and binding affinities of 6-nitroquipazine analogues for serotonin transporter. Part 1.
AID1302251Inhibition of human GRK2 S670A mutant preincubated for 30 mins using tubulin as substrate followed by ATP addition2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 04-28, Volume: 59, Issue:8
Structure-Based Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Highly Selective and Potent G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 Inhibitors.
AID229545Relative binding to noradrenaline and serotonin transporters (ratio of Ki)1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-15, Volume: 41, Issue:2
Synthesis and ligand binding of tropane ring analogues of paroxetine.
AID612587Antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus K2378 bearing norA++ efficient mutation by M7-A7 CLSI microdilution method2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-25, Volume: 54, Issue:16
Evolution from a natural flavones nucleus to obtain 2-(4-Propoxyphenyl)quinoline derivatives as potent inhibitors of the S. aureus NorA efflux pump.
AID669746Antibacterial activity against norA-deficient Staphylococcus aureus SAK1902 by microdilution method2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-12, Volume: 55, Issue:7
Pyrazolo[4,3-c][1,2]benzothiazines 5,5-dioxide: a promising new class of Staphylococcus aureus NorA efflux pump inhibitors.
AID678714Inhibition of human CYP2C19 assessed as ratio of IC50 in absence of NADPH to IC50 for presence of NADPH using 3-butyryl-7-methoxycoumarin as substrate after 30 mins2012Chemical research in toxicology, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:10
Preclinical strategy to reduce clinical hepatotoxicity using in vitro bioactivation data for >200 compounds.
AID7783Unbound fraction (plasma)2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Prediction of human volume of distribution values for neutral and basic drugs. 2. Extended data set and leave-class-out statistics.
AID1302240Inhibition of PKA (unknown origin) using CREBtide as substrate by ADP-Glo kinase assay2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 04-28, Volume: 59, Issue:8
Structure-Based Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Highly Selective and Potent G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 Inhibitors.
AID314313Inhibition of MepA-mediated efflux in Staphylococcus aureus K28862008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-15, Volume: 18, Issue:4
Synthesis and evaluation of PSSRI-based inhibitors of Staphylococcus aureus multidrug efflux pumps.
AID387489Selectivity for human NET over human SERT2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-15, Volume: 18, Issue:18
Synthesis and activity of 1-(3-amino-1-phenylpropyl)indolin-2-ones: a new class of selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors.
AID147740Binding affinity against norepinephrine transporter (NET) by displacement of [3H]nisoxetine in male wistar rats2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-04, Volume: 46, Issue:25
Syntheses and binding studies of new [(aryl)(aryloxy)methyl]piperidine derivatives and related compounds as potential antidepressant drugs with high affinity for serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) transporters.
AID204080Equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) for Competitive binding between [3H]- imipramine and the compound at human transporter-hSERT1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-03, Volume: 8, Issue:5
Synthesis of a potent wide-spectrum serotonin-, norepinephrine-, dopamine-reuptake inhibitor (SNDRI) and a species-selective dopamine-reuptake inhibitor based on the gamma-amino alcohol functional group.
AID29813Oral bioavailability in human2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 43, Issue:13
QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
AID373222AUC (0 to 24 hrs) in human at 20 mg, po qd for 10 days2007Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Nov, Volume: 51, Issue:11
Interaction study of the combined use of paroxetine and fosamprenavir-ritonavir in healthy subjects.
AID298031Lipophilicity, log D at pH7.42007Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-20, Volume: 50, Issue:19
High-throughput screening of drug-brain tissue binding and in silico prediction for assessment of central nervous system drug delivery.
AID1211298Dissociation constant, pKa of the compound2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Mar, Volume: 39, Issue:3
Control and measurement of plasma pH in equilibrium dialysis: influence on drug plasma protein binding.
AID298032Acid dissociation constant, pKa of the compound2007Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-20, Volume: 50, Issue:19
High-throughput screening of drug-brain tissue binding and in silico prediction for assessment of central nervous system drug delivery.
AID1449986Antibacterial activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate 116381 after 18 to 24 hrs by microbroth dilution assay2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-11, Volume: 60, Issue:9
A Tobramycin Vector Enhances Synergy and Efficacy of Efflux Pump Inhibitors against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria.
AID373228Cmax in human at 20 mg, po qd for 10 days followed by 16 days washout period and treated with 20 mg, po qd for 10 days coadministered with fosamprenavir at 700 mg, po bid and ritonavir at 100 mg, po bid2007Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Nov, Volume: 51, Issue:11
Interaction study of the combined use of paroxetine and fosamprenavir-ritonavir in healthy subjects.
AID132117Tested in vivo for head twitches antagonizing activity in mice1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 33, Issue:10
Pyrroloisoquinoline antidepressants. 3. A focus on serotonin.
AID1079944Benign tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.BEN' in source]
AID1472910Binding affinity to Ebola virus Zaire Mayinga-76 recombinant GP protein by SYPRO orange dye-based fluorescence assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-08, Volume: 61, Issue:3
Target Identification and Mode of Action of Four Chemically Divergent Drugs against Ebolavirus Infection.
AID145563Equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) for Competitive binding between [3H]- nisoxatine and the compound at human Norepinephrine transporter1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-03, Volume: 8, Issue:5
Synthesis of a potent wide-spectrum serotonin-, norepinephrine-, dopamine-reuptake inhibitor (SNDRI) and a species-selective dopamine-reuptake inhibitor based on the gamma-amino alcohol functional group.
AID254319Binding inhibition towards human dopamine transporter2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-22, Volume: 48, Issue:19
Conformationally restricted homotryptamines. 2. Indole cyclopropylmethylamines as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
AID1449931Inhibition of RND efflux pump in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 assessed as potentiation of minocycline-induced antibacterial activity at 8 ug/ml after 18 to 24 hrs by checker board assay2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-11, Volume: 60, Issue:9
A Tobramycin Vector Enhances Synergy and Efficacy of Efflux Pump Inhibitors against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria.
AID1207758Inhibition of Cav1.2 current measured using QPatch automatic path clamp system in CHO cells expressing Cav1.2, beta-2 and alpha-2/delta-1 subunits2013Scientific reports, , Volume: 3MICE models: superior to the HERG model in predicting Torsade de Pointes.
AID1744445Inhibition of PKA (unknown origin) incubated for 30 mins using REBtide substrate by ADP-Glo assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 01-14, Volume: 64, Issue:1
Generation of Highly Selective, Potent, and Covalent G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 5 Inhibitors.
AID1302241Inhibition of ROCK1 (unknown origin) at 10 uM by ADP-Glo kinase assay2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 04-28, Volume: 59, Issue:8
Structure-Based Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Highly Selective and Potent G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 Inhibitors.
AID1474166Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring severity class index2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID497005Antimicrobial activity against Pneumocystis carinii2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID1079938Chronic liver disease either proven histopathologically, or through a chonic elevation of serum amino-transferase activity after 6 months. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHRON' in source]
AID1472912Antiviral activity against Ebolavirus infected in human HepG2 cells assessed as reduction in virus entry after 48 hrs by Celltiter-Glo luminescent assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-08, Volume: 61, Issue:3
Target Identification and Mode of Action of Four Chemically Divergent Drugs against Ebolavirus Infection.
AID373223Cmax in human at 20 mg, po qd for 10 days2007Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Nov, Volume: 51, Issue:11
Interaction study of the combined use of paroxetine and fosamprenavir-ritonavir in healthy subjects.
AID739023Displacement of [125I]substance P from human recombinant NK1 receptor expressed in human U373 cells after 1 hr by scintillation counting analysis2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Apr-15, Volume: 21, Issue:8
Discovery of disubstituted piperidines and homopiperidines as potent dual NK1 receptor antagonists-serotonin reuptake transporter inhibitors for the treatment of depression.
AID540210Clearance in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID625289Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver disease2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID254322Binding inhibition towards human serotonin transporter2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-22, Volume: 48, Issue:19
Conformationally restricted homotryptamines. 2. Indole cyclopropylmethylamines as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
AID147593Inhibition of [3H]nisoxetine (0.5 nM) binding to Noradrenaline transporter1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-15, Volume: 41, Issue:2
Synthesis and ligand binding of tropane ring analogues of paroxetine.
AID540213Half life in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID373225Half life in human at 20 mg, po qd for 10 days2007Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Nov, Volume: 51, Issue:11
Interaction study of the combined use of paroxetine and fosamprenavir-ritonavir in healthy subjects.
AID496817Antimicrobial activity against Trypanosoma cruzi2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID1528205Antagonist activity at rat P2X4 receptor tranfected in human 1321N1 cells assessed as inhibition of ATP-induced calcium influx incubated for 10 mins by Fluo2-AM staining based inverted fluorescence microscopic method2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 12-26, Volume: 62, Issue:24
Discovery and Characterization of the Potent and Selective P2X4 Inhibitor
AID496818Antimicrobial activity against Trypanosoma brucei brucei2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID1332032Toxicity in Wistar rat assessed as increase in spontaneous locomotor activity at 3 and 10 mg/kg, po administered 26 and 2 hrs prior to testing measured for 30 mins2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 01-01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Discovery of SMP-304, a novel benzylpiperidine derivative with serotonin transporter inhibitory activity and 5-HT
AID134215Tested in vitro for dopamine(DA) neuronal uptake inhibition1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 33, Issue:10
Pyrroloisoquinoline antidepressants. 3. A focus on serotonin.
AID361595Displacement of [3H]citalopram from human SERT expressed in HEK293 cells2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-15, Volume: 18, Issue:16
3-(4-(6-Fluoroalkoxy-3,4-dihydroisoquinoline-2(1H)-yl)cyclohexyl)-1H-indole-5-carbonitriles for SERT imaging: chemical synthesis, evaluation in vitro and radiofluorination.
AID625280Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholecystitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID206400Concentration required to reduce Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of Norfloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus 1199B by 8 folds2004Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-21, Volume: 14, Issue:12
Structural differences between paroxetine and femoxetine responsible for differential inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus efflux pumps.
AID1744430Inhibition of bovine GRK2 using porcine brain tubulin as substrate incubated for 3 to 5 mins by [gamma32P]ATP based radiometric assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 01-14, Volume: 64, Issue:1
Generation of Highly Selective, Potent, and Covalent G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 5 Inhibitors.
AID1079935Cytolytic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is > 5 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CYTOL' in source]
AID1460863Inhibition of GRK2 in isoproterenol-stimulated C57/BL6 mouse cardiomyocytes assessed as increase in contractility by measuring cell shortening pretreated for 10 mins followed by beta-AR agonist isoproterenol addition for 2 mins2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 04-13, Volume: 60, Issue:7
Structure-Based Design of Highly Selective and Potent G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 Inhibitors Based on Paroxetine.
AID196387Inhibition of uptake of [3H]5-HT in synaptosomes from rat cortex1997Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-28, Volume: 40, Issue:7
Structure-activity studies for a novel series of N-(arylethyl)-N-(1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalen-1-ylmethyl)-N-methylamine s possessing dual 5-HT uptake inhibiting and alpha2-antagonistic activities.
AID229542Relative binding to dopamine and serotonin transporters (ratio of Ki)1998Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-15, Volume: 41, Issue:2
Synthesis and ligand binding of tropane ring analogues of paroxetine.
AID496827Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania amazonensis2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID311933Inhibition of ASM in rat PC12 cells assessed as residual activity at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-24, Volume: 51, Issue:2
Identification of new functional inhibitors of acid sphingomyelinase using a structure-property-activity relation model.
AID588209Literature-mined public compounds from Greene et al multi-species hepatotoxicity modelling dataset2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jul-19, Volume: 23, Issue:7
Developing structure-activity relationships for the prediction of hepatotoxicity.
AID1302239Inhibition of GRK5 (unknown origin) using tubulin as substrate by SDS-PAGE method2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 04-28, Volume: 59, Issue:8
Structure-Based Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Highly Selective and Potent G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 Inhibitors.
AID1449984Inhibition of RND efflux pump in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate 116381 assessed as potentiation of minocycline-induced antibacterial activity at 8 ug/ml after 18 to 24 hrs by microbroth dilution assay2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-11, Volume: 60, Issue:9
A Tobramycin Vector Enhances Synergy and Efficacy of Efflux Pump Inhibitors against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria.
AID750897Inhibition of NorA in Staphylococcus aureus 1199B harboring grlA A116E mutant assessed as inhibition of ethidium bromide efflux at 50 uM measured for 5 mins by fluorometric analysis relative to control2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-27, Volume: 56, Issue:12
Re-evolution of the 2-phenylquinolines: ligand-based design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of a potent new class of Staphylococcus aureus NorA efflux pump inhibitors to combat antimicrobial resistance.
AID669747Antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus SAK2378 overexpressing norA by microdilution method2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-12, Volume: 55, Issue:7
Pyrazolo[4,3-c][1,2]benzothiazines 5,5-dioxide: a promising new class of Staphylococcus aureus NorA efflux pump inhibitors.
AID1079949Proposed mechanism(s) of liver damage. [column 'MEC' in source]
AID134217Tested in vitro for serotonin(5-HT) neuronal uptake inhibition1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 33, Issue:10
Pyrroloisoquinoline antidepressants. 3. A focus on serotonin.
AID496826Antimicrobial activity against Entamoeba histolytica2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID612619Inhibition of wild-type norA expressing Staphylococcus aureus 1199 assessed as reduction in ciprofloxacin MIC2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-25, Volume: 54, Issue:16
Evolution from a natural flavones nucleus to obtain 2-(4-Propoxyphenyl)quinoline derivatives as potent inhibitors of the S. aureus NorA efflux pump.
AID1449930Antibacterial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 after 18 to 24 hrs by microbroth dilution assay2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-11, Volume: 60, Issue:9
A Tobramycin Vector Enhances Synergy and Efficacy of Efflux Pump Inhibitors against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria.
AID1332035Ratio of IC50 for human SERT expressed in CHO cell membranes assessed as reduction in [3H]serotonin uptake to Ki for [3H]citalopram from human SERT expressed in HEK293 cell membranes2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 01-01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Discovery of SMP-304, a novel benzylpiperidine derivative with serotonin transporter inhibitory activity and 5-HT
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID651635Viability Counterscreen for Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1347424RapidFire Mass Spectrometry qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347103qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347083qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: Viability assay - alamar blue signal for LASV Primary Screen2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347425Rhodamine-PBP qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347092qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for A673 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347098qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347090qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347108qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347091qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347105qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1508630Primary qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome: Secreted ER Calcium Modulated Protein (SERCaMP) assay2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID1347096qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347097qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347086qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Arenaviruses (LCMV): LCMV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347100qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347154Primary screen GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347101qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347094qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347102qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347089qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347082qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: LASV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347093qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1347107qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347104qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347407qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Pharmaceutical Collection2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1347095qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347099qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347106qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347049Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr1) antagonism - Pilot screen2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID588378qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression: Validation
AID1347045Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr1) antagonism - Pilot counterscreen GloSensor control cell line2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID504810Antagonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID504812Inverse Agonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID1347050Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr2) antagonism - Pilot subtype selectivity assay2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID504836Inducers of the Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response (ERSR) in human glioma: Validation2002The Journal of biological chemistry, Apr-19, Volume: 277, Issue:16
Sustained ER Ca2+ depletion suppresses protein synthesis and induces activation-enhanced cell death in mast cells.
AID588349qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression: Validation of Cytotoxic Assay
AID1346637Human P2X4 (P2X receptors)2016Neuropharmacology, 05, Volume: 104Medicinal chemistry of adenosine, P2Y and P2X receptors.
AID1346943Human SERT (Monoamine transporter subfamily)1997European journal of pharmacology, Dec-11, Volume: 340, Issue:2-3
Pharmacological profile of antidepressants and related compounds at human monoamine transporters.
AID1346943Human SERT (Monoamine transporter subfamily)2016Nature, Apr-21, Volume: 532, Issue:7599
X-ray structures and mechanism of the human serotonin transporter.
AID1346637Human P2X4 (P2X receptors)2013Molecular pharmacology, Apr, Volume: 83, Issue:4
P2X receptors as drug targets.
AID1159550Human Phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (6PGD) Inhibitor Screening2015Nature cell biology, Nov, Volume: 17, Issue:11
6-Phosphogluconate dehydrogenase links oxidative PPP, lipogenesis and tumour growth by inhibiting LKB1-AMPK signalling.
AID1159607Screen for inhibitors of RMI FANCM (MM2) intereaction2016Journal of biomolecular screening, Jul, Volume: 21, Issue:6
A High-Throughput Screening Strategy to Identify Protein-Protein Interaction Inhibitors That Block the Fanconi Anemia DNA Repair Pathway.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (3,996)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-1990127 (3.18)18.7374
1990's989 (24.75)18.2507
2000's1700 (42.54)29.6817
2010's954 (23.87)24.3611
2020's226 (5.66)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 123.25

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index123.25 (24.57)
Research Supply Index8.57 (2.92)
Research Growth Index5.37 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index232.94 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.01 (0.95)

This Compound (123.25)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials1,031 (24.22%)5.53%
Reviews402 (9.44%)6.00%
Case Studies611 (14.35%)4.05%
Observational10 (0.23%)0.25%
Other2,203 (51.75%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (215)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Randomized, 2-Way Crossover, Bioequivalence Study of Paroxetine Hydrochloride 40 mg Film-Coated Tablets and Paxil® 40 mg Film-Coated Tablets Administered as 1 x 40 mg Film-Coated Tablet in Healthy Subjects Under Fed Conditions [NCT00841659]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-08-31Completed
Endobiotics for Phenotyping of Human Cytochrome P450 Enzymes: Use of Metabolomics for the Identification of New CYP2D6 Endogenous Biomarkers in Healthy Volunteers [NCT04188028]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-01Completed
Study of Antidepressants in Parkinson's Disease [NCT00086190]Phase 3115 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
Effect of Tamsulosin on Premature Ejaculation Compared With Paroxetine Hydrochloride [NCT03879746]Phase 3160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-04-30Not yet recruiting
Influence of Pharmacogenetic Factors, Paroxetine and Clarithromycin on Pharmacokinetics of Clomiphene [NCT01289756]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
Effects of Antidepressant on Postsynaptic Signal Transduction in Serotonergic System of Depressed Patients [NCT01352572]300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2002-01-31Active, not recruiting
Special Drug Use Investigation for PAXIL Tablet (Long-term) [NCT01371448]339 participants (Actual)Observational2001-05-31Completed
Special Drug Use Investigation for PAXIL Tablet (Pediatric Panic Disorder) [NCT01376128]96 participants (Actual)Observational2008-03-31Completed
Open-Label, Two-Period Phase 1 Study in Healthy Subjects to Evaluate the Potential Effect of Multiple Doses of Paroxetine on the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of HBI-3000 [NCT04650542]Phase 139 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-02-21Completed
Development of A Technique to Predict Antidepressant Responsiveness in Depressive Patients [NCT01237275]300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1999-10-31Active, not recruiting
An Open-Label Study to Assess the Effect of CYP2D6 Inhibitor Paroxetine on the Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of JNJ-31001074 in Healthy Subjects [NCT01159821]Phase 114 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
Prediction of Antidepressant Response Using Pharmacogenetics of Bioamine Transporter and Peripheral Lymphocytic Phenotype [NCT01352559]1,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2001-11-30Active, not recruiting
Special Drug Use Investigation for PAXIL Tablet (Investigation in Case of Administered From 20mg/Day) [NCT01371474]1,483 participants (Actual)Observational2006-04-30Completed
Electrophysiological Results of the Efficacy of Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Mood State and Quality of Life in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Patients [NCT05188833]30 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-05-17Active, not recruiting
A Phase I, Randomized, Open-Label, Active- and Placebo-Controlled Parallel Group Study of the Effect of Subcutaneous and Intravenous Methylnaltrexone on CYP450 2D6 Activity in Healthy Extensive Metabolizers of Dextromethorphan [NCT01367535]Phase 154 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
Drug Use Investigation for PAXIL Tablet [NCT01371435]3,708 participants (Actual)Observational2001-04-30Completed
Special Drug Use Investigation for PAXIL (Paroxetine) Social Anxiety Disorder (Long-term) [NCT01376271]600 participants (Actual)Observational2010-01-31Completed
Randomized, Open Label, 2-way Crossover, Single Dose Bioequivalence Study of Paroxetine IR Tablets Manufactured in GSKT and Mississauga Sites in Healthy Chinese Participants Under Fasting and Fed Conditions [NCT03329573]Phase 185 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-05-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Placebo- and Active-Controlled, Phase 4 Study Evaluating the Effect of Vortioxetine 10 and 20 mg/Day vs Paroxetine 20 mg/Day on Sexual Functioning in Healthy Subjects [NCT02932904]Phase 4361 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-21Completed
Special Drug Use Investigation for PAXIL Tablet (20mg-Clinical Symptom Progression) [NCT01371461]390 participants (Actual)Observational2004-01-31Completed
Pilot Study of Paroxetine and Fluconazole for the Treatment of HIV Associated Neurocognitive Disorder (HAND) [NCT01354314]Phase 1/Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
A Ten-week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-and Active-Controlled, Paralleled-Group, Flexible-Dose Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of GSK372475 or Paroxetine Compared to Placebo in Adult Subjects Diagnosed With Major [NCT00420641]Phase 2492 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-19Completed
Initial Severity and Antidepressant Efficacy for Anxiety Disorders: an Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis [NCT02476136]8,800 participants (Anticipated)Observational2015-05-31Active, not recruiting
Measurement-based Care vs. Standard Care for Major Depressive Disorder: a Randomized Controlled Trial With Masked Raters [NCT02191124]Phase 4164 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
An Oral Single-dose, Randomized, Balanced, Open-label, Two-sequence, Two-treatment, Two-period, Crossover Bioequivalence Study of Paroxetine Tablets 20 mg of GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals S.A, With That of PAXIL (Paroxetine) Tablets 20 mg of GlaxoSmithK [NCT04311463]Phase 138 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-09Completed
A Phase 3, Twelve-Week, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Efficacy and Safety Study of Mesafem (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules in the Treatment of Vasomotor Symptoms Associated With Menopause [NCT01361308]Phase 3614 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
Optimizing Antidepressant Treatment by Genotype-dependent Adjustment of Medication According to the ABCB1 Gene [NCT02237937]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-09-30Recruiting
Risk of Phenoconversion in Genetic Extensive Metabolizers Healthy Volunteers Carriers of One Fully-Functional and One Non-Functional Allele Versus Carriers of Two Fully-Functional Alleles [NCT03054220]34 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Completed
An Open Label Randomized Two-way Crossover Study to Investigate the Effect of Paroxetine Mediated CYP2D6 Inhibition on the Single Oral Dose Pharmacokinetics of Tamsulosin in Healthy Male Volunteers (CYP2D6 Extensive Metabolizers) [NCT02264184]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
Randomized, 2-Way Crossover, Bioequivalence Study of Paroxetine Hydrochloride 40 mg Film-Coated Tablets and Paxil® 40 mg Film-Coated Tablets Administered as 1 x 40 mg Film-Coated Tablet in Healthy Subjects Under Fasting Conditions [NCT00841698]Phase 150 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-10-31Completed
An 8-week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo- and Paroxetine-controlled Study of the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Agomelatine 25 or 50 mg Given Once Daily in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) Followed by a 52-week Open- [NCT00463242]Phase 3501 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, 10-Week Placebo Controlled Fixed Dose Study Of PD 0332334 And Paroxetine Evaluating The Efficacy And Safety Of PD 0332334 For The Treatment Of Generalized Anxiety Disorder [NCT00658008]Phase 3501 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Please see Detailed Description for termination reason.)
An Eight-week, Multicenter, Double-blind, Placebo- and Paroxetine-controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Tolerability of Two Fixed Doses of SSR149415 (250 mg Bid and 100 mg Bid) in Outpatients With Generalized Anxiety Disorder [NCT00374166]Phase 2325 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Study Evaluating The Sexual Functioning of Healthy Adults After Receiving Multiple-Dose Regimens of Vilazodone, Paroxetine, or Placebo [NCT02097147]Phase 1202 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Completed
Combination of Paroxetine CR and Quetiapine for the Treatment of Refractory Generalized Anxiety Disorder [NCT00113295]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-02-29Completed
Early Intervention for PTSD in Iraqi Veterans [NCT00641173]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Withdrawn by funding source)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, 10-Week Placebo Controlled Fixed Dose Study of PD 0332334 and Paroxetine Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of PD 0332334 for the Treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder [NCT00658762]Phase 3286 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Please see Detailed Description for termination reason.)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, 10-Week Placebo Controlled Fixed Dose Study Of PD 0332334 And Paroxetine Evaluating The Efficacy And Safety Of PD 0332334 For The Treatment Of Generalized Anxiety Disorder [NCT00658372]Phase 3360 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Please see Detailed Description for termination reason.)
Predict Antidepressant Responsiveness Using Pharmacogenomics [NCT01228357]1,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2003-02-28Recruiting
Serotonin-norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors and Acute Kidney Injury [NCT02320240]3,255,526 participants (Actual)Observational2013-06-30Completed
Definitive Selection of Neuroimaging Biomarkers in Anxiety Disorder and Obsessive-compulsive Disorder: A Longitudinal Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging ( fMRI )Study With Paroxetine Treatment [NCT03894085]150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-05-30Recruiting
A Randomized, Open-label, Trial of Lithium Versus Paroxetine in Subjects With Major Depression Who Have a Family History of Bipolar Disorder or Completed Suicide [NCT01416220]Phase 42 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
Continuation Electroconvulsive Therapy Associated With Pharmacotherapy Versus Pharmacotherapy Alone for Relapse Prevention in Major Depression. A Clinical, Controlled, Prospective and Randomized Trial [NCT01305707]Phase 4104 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Difficulties in recruiting)
Discontinuation of Antipsychotics and Antidepressants Among Patients With Dementia and BPSD Living in Nursing Homes - a 24 Weeks Double Blind RCT. [NCT00594269]Phase 4149 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
A 4-Week, Double-Blind, Randomized, Multicenter, Fixed Dose, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Study of Lorazepam and Paroxetine in Patients With Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Assessment of a New Instrument Intended to Capture Rapid Onset [NCT00715039]169 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-31Completed
Single-Dose Fed Bioequivalence Study of Paroxetine Hydrochloride Tablets (40 mg; Mylan) and Paxil® Tablets (40 mg; GSK) in Healthy Adult Volunteers [NCT00650403]Phase 166 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
An Open-label, Randomized, Single Dose, Two-period Crossover Study to Demonstrate Bioequivalence Between the Controlled Release Paroxetine Tablet (37.5 mg) Manufactured at Cidra and Mississauga [NCT00749359]Phase 1166 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-07Completed
TRY FIRST: A 12-Week, Randomized, Open-Label Trial of Duloxetine Versus Generic SSRIs in the Treatment of a Severe Depressive Episode [NCT00666757]Phase 4750 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
Paroxetine-CR (Paxil-CR) in the Treatment of Patients With Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Randomized, Double Blind, Parallel Group, Flexible Dose, Placebo Controlled Trial. [NCT00610610]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-01-31Completed
Pharmacogenomic Study to Predict Antidepressant Responsiveness in Depressed Patients [NCT00817375]1,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2003-02-28Recruiting
A Double-Blind, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of One Fixed Dose of SR58611A (700 mg/Day) Versus Placebo and Paroxetine (20 mg/Day) in Patients With a Recurrent Major Depressive Episode. [NCT00825019]Phase 3306 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-09-30Completed
An Eight-week, Double-blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Two Fixed Doses of Saredutant (100 mg and 30 mg) Once Daily in Combination With Paroxetine 20 mg Once Daily Compared to Saredutant Placebo in Combination With Paroxeti [NCT00629551]Phase 3825 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
A Comparison of Prolonged Exposure Therapy, Pharmacotherapy, and Their Combination for PTSD: What Works Best, and for Whom [NCT04961190]Phase 4300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-25Recruiting
Psycho-biological Substrates of Therapeutic Benefit of Thermal Cure on Generalized Anxiety Disorders (Insula-TOP) [NCT03277339]Phase 452 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-19Completed
An Open-label, 2-Part, Phase 1 Clinical Trial to Evaluate Drug Interactions When DA-8010 is Co-administered With Paroxetine or Mirabegron in Healthy Adults [NCT05992428]Phase 136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-22Recruiting
Assessment of PACAP-BDNF Signaling System Involvement in Etiology and Treatment of Major Depression [NCT00944996]100 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Paroxetines Effect on Tramadols Metabolism and Pharmakodynamics: a Dose Response Study [NCT00785603]Phase 412 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Active, not recruiting
Effect of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Antidepressants on Semen Parameters [NCT00385762]35 participants (Actual)Observational2007-01-31Completed
A Parallel Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of Paroxetine Daily Doses of 15 mg and 20 mg in the Treatment of Premature Ejaculation [NCT01024491]Phase 3174 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
Lofexidine Pharmacokinetics in the Presence of Paroxetine, a Strong CYP2D6 Inhibitor, in Healthy Volunteers [NCT02681198]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-31Completed
A Phase IV, Longitudinal, Observational Study Examining Real-World Outcomes of Non-Hormonal Pharmacotherapies Among Individuals Treated for Bothersome Vasomotor Symptoms [NCT06049797]1,000 participants (Anticipated)Observational2023-11-15Recruiting
A Long-term, Phase 3, Multicenter, Open-label Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Oral OPC-34712 as Adjunctive Therapy in Adults With Major Depressive Disorder, the Orion Trial [NCT01360866]Phase 32,944 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
Naltrexone & SSRI in Alcoholics With Depression/PTSD [NCT00338962]Phase 388 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-10-31Completed
Monoamine Transporters Genotypes: Risk of PTSD and Related Comorbidities [NCT00403455]Phase 338 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
A Double-Blind, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of One Fixed Dose of SR58611A (700 mg/Day) Versus Placebo and Paroxetine (20 mg/Day) in Patients With a Recurrent Major Depressive Episode. [NCT00825058]Phase 3317 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-11-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Clinical Effects of Controlled Release Paroxetine in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder [NCT00866294]Phase 3416 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of OPC-34712 as Adjunctive Therapy in the Treatment of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder [NCT00797966]Phase 2850 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
A Phase 2, Exploratory, Eight-Week, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Efficacy and Safety Study of Mesafem (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules in the Treatment of Vasomotor Symptoms Associated With Menopause [NCT00786188]Phase 2102 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
Luteal Phase Administration of Paroxetine for the Treatment of PMDD: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial in Canadian Women [NCT00620581]Phase 30 participants InterventionalCompleted
Single-Dose Food In Vivo Bioequivalence Study of Paroxetine Hydrochloride Controlled-Release Tablets (25 mg; Mylan) to Paxil CR™ Tablets (25 mg; GlaxoSmithKline) in Healthy Volunteers [NCT00647881]Phase 175 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
Single-Dose Fasting In Vivo Bioequivalence Study of Paroxetine Hydrochloride Controlled-Release Tablets (25 mg; Mylan) to Paxil CR™ Tablets (25 mg; GlaxoSmithKline) in Healthy Volunteers [NCT00648427]Phase 175 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
Efficacy of Three Treatment Modalities for Panic Disorder Among Individuals Consulting Emergency Departments for Non Cardiac Chest Pain [NCT00736346]204 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-10-31Recruiting
Long-term, Open, Naturalistic, Randomized Clinical Trial With Clonazepam and Paroxetine in Panic Disorder With or Without Agoraphobia [NCT02852577]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-01-31Completed
Phase 4 Study of Development of Pharmacogenomic Method to Predict Antidepressant Responsiveness [NCT00817011]1,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-04-30Recruiting
Hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal System: Role of the Mineralocorticoid Receptor and Longitudinal Study in Depressed Patients [NCT01049347]Phase 3127 participants (Actual)Interventional1997-10-31Completed
Clinical Study to Investigate the Effect of the Combination of Psychotropic Drugs and an Opioid on Ventilation [NCT04310579]Phase 155 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-06-15Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study Of Sertraline Compared With Paroxetine In The Treatment Of Panic Disorder [NCT00677352]Phase 4321 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
The Effect of Paroxetine on the Plasma Levels of Timolol Using Ophthalmic 0.5% Timolol Eye Drops and 0.1% Timolol Eye Gel in Healthy Volunteers [NCT00879099]Phase 112 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
Phase 4 Study of Panic Disorder That Expresses to Change of Cerebral Glucose Metabolism After 12 Week of Paroxetine Treatment [NCT00767754]Phase 437 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Lamotrigine as an Antidepressant Augmentation Agent in Treatment Refractory Unipolar Depression [NCT00901407]138 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-31Completed
A Steady-state, Two-period Crossover Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetic Profile of Paroxetine After Repeated Daily Dosing of the Controlled-release Paroxetine Tablet (25 mg) With That of the Standard Immediate-release Paroxetine Tablet (20 mg) in Health [NCT01000857]Phase 126 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-05Completed
A Study to Investigate the Effect of Antidepressants on the Treatment for Korean Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) Patients [NCT00926835]Phase 4692 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Terminated(stopped due to due to patient recruitment difficulties)
Definitive Selection of Neuroimaging Biomarkers for the Diagnosis and Treatment to Common Mental Disorders [NCT04218981]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-15Recruiting
A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group , Flexible Dose Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Paxil® Tablets in Children and Adolescents With Major Depressive Disorder [NCT00812812]Phase 456 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Terminated
Efficacy and Safety of Paroxetine Controlled Release for Major Depressive Disorder in Irritable Bowel Syndrome Patients: An Open-label, Randomized, add-on Study [NCT01916200]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to This study was Cancelled Before Active)
A Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Controlled Trial of Lithium Versus Paroxetine in Subjects With Major Depression Who Have a Family History of Bipolar Disorder or Completed Suicide - a Pilot Study [NCT00400088]Phase 32 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Recruitment difficulties)
The Use of Quantitative EEG (QEEG) as a Predictor of Treatment Outcome in Major Depressive Disorder [NCT00157547]Phase 495 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Placebo-Controlled, Forced Dose Titration Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GW679769 and Paroxetine in Subjects With Social Anxiety Disorder [NCT00273039]Phase 2242 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison of LY686017, Paroxetine, and Placebo in the Treatment of Social Anxiety Disorder [NCT00191022]Phase 2185 participants Interventional2004-12-31Completed
A Single-blind Trial of Risperidone vs. Paroxetine for Treatment of Panic Attacks [NCT00206765]Phase 290 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2003-01-31Terminated
A Placebo-controlled Trial of Adjunctive Quetiapine for Refractory PTSD [NCT00292370]Phase 4124 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Paroxetine-referenced, Parallel-group Study to Evaluate the Safety, Efficacy, and Tolerability of 3 Fixed Doses (50mg, 100mg, AND 200mg) of Desvenlafaxine Succinate Sustained-release Tablets in Adult Outpatients Wi [NCT00445679]Phase 3807 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
Assessment of the Efficacy of Paroxetine in the Prevention of Depressive Syndrome in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Treated by PEG-Interferon Alfa Plus Ribavirin. Multicentric, Double-Blinded, Randomized Study. ANRS HC18 Paropeg [NCT00196664]Phase 3144 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
Clinical Evaluation of BRL29060 A in Generalized Anxiety Disorder [NCT00135525]Phase 20 participants Interventional2003-05-31Completed
Paroxetine Controlled Release in the Treatment of Symptomatic Menopausal Women Following Discontinuation of Hormone Therapy [NCT00225914]Phase 464 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
Single-Dose Fasting Bioequivalence Study of Paroxetine Hydrochloride Tablets (40 mg; Mylan) and Paxil® Tablets (40 mg; GSK) in Healthy Adult Volunteers [NCT00648193]Early Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
An Interventional, Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled, Active-referenced (Paroxetine), Fixed-dose Study on the Efficacy of Vortioxetine on Cognitive Dysfunction in Working Patients With Major Depressive Disorder [NCT02279966]Phase 3152 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Completed
[NCT02273154]Phase 4240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-08-31Recruiting
Longitudinal Comparative Effectiveness of Bipolar Disorder Therapies [NCT02893371]1,037,352 participants (Actual)Observational2016-09-30Completed
A Phase 3, Twenty-Four Week, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Efficacy and Safety Study of Mesafem (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules in the Treatment of Vasomotor Symptoms Associated With Menopause [NCT01101841]Phase 3570 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
Paroxetine Versus Bupropion for Suicide Ideators or Attempters With Major Depressive Disorder [NCT00429169]Phase 4101 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Interim analysis showed differential treatment effects.)
BRL29060A in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder [NCT00839397]Phase 352 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-05-31Completed
An Open Label, Randomized, Three-period Crossover Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetic Profile of Paroxetine After Single Doses of the Controlled-release Paroxetine Tablets at the Dose Levels of 12.5, 25 and 50mg in Healthy Japanese Male Subjects [NCT00938184]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-14Completed
Neural Correlates of Early Intervention for PTSD [NCT00665678]Phase 4160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-04-30Terminated
Effects of Paxil CR on Neural Circuits in PTSD [NCT00672776]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-05-31Completed
Group Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Fluoxetine for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: a Randomized Open Trial for Any Patient. [NCT00680602]Phase 4158 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
A Randomized, Controlled Trial on the Effects of Paroxetine Versus Placebo in Combination With Aerobic Exercise or Relaxation Training in the Treatment of Panic Disorder [NCT00540098]Phase 475 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-09-30Completed
"Single-center, Randomized, Open-label, Two-way Crossover Study to Characterize Phenotyping Metrics of the Basel Cocktail After CYP Induction or Inhibition in Healthy Male Subjects" [NCT01386593]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
Paroxetine Treatment in Outpatients With Comorbid PTSD and Substance Dependence [NCT00330239]Phase 425 participants Interventional2003-01-31Completed
Treatment of Geriatric Bipolar Mood Disorders: A Pilot Study [NCT00177567]Phase 460 participants Interventional2001-07-31Completed
A 6- Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Active-and Placebo-Controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy of R228060 in Adult Subjects With Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) [NCT00073203]Phase 2488 participants InterventionalCompleted
Maintenance Therapies in Late-Life Depression 2 (MTLD-2) [NCT00178100]Phase 4225 participants Interventional1999-03-31Completed
Paroxetine for the Prevention of IFN-Alpha Associated Depression in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C [NCT00209118]60 participants InterventionalCompleted
Randomized Trial of Paroxetine-CR for the Treatment of Patients With Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Remaining Symptomatic After Initial Exposure Therapy [NCT00215163]Phase 2/Phase 317 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-12-31Completed
Comparison of Aripiprazole Augmentation vs Switching to Different Class of Antidepressants for Patients With MDD Who Are Partially/Minimally Responsive to Current Antidepressants:Randomized, Rater-blinded, Prospective Study [NCT01488266]90 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-11-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase I, Randomized, Two-Period, Single-Center Study to Assess the Effect of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 Inhibitors on a Single Oral Dose of AV650 (300 mg) in Healthy Subjects [NCT00456560]Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
[NCT00492414]Phase 40 participants InterventionalRecruiting
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group, fMRI and PET Study Comparing Emotional Challenge-induced Regional Cerebral Blood Flow Changes Before and After 8 Weeks of Treatment With Placebo and Paroxetine in Subjects With Social Anxiety [NCT00470483]Phase 156 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-22Completed
Prospective 24-week Study, Comparing Clinical Outcomes Between Switching Antidepressants and Maintaining the Same Antidepressant in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Who do Not Show a 20% Reduction in Symptoms at Week 2 [NCT00519012]Phase 4200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-08-31Recruiting
A Placebo-Controlled Study to Investigate the Onset of Action of Paroxetine When Used for the Treatment of Premenstrual Dysphoria [NCT00516113]Phase 424 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-10-31Completed
Paroxetine in the Treatment of Chronic Primary Insomnia: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of Efficacy Over Six Weeks [NCT00178048]Phase 466 participants Interventional1998-09-30Completed
Comparative Evaluation of Vortioxetine Versus Other Antidepressants With Pregabalin Augmentation in Treatment-resistant Burning Mouth Syndrome: a Prospective Longitudinal Clinical Trial With Treatment Response Prediction [NCT06025474]Phase 3203 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-01Recruiting
[NCT02934035]10,000 participants (Anticipated)Observational2016-09-30Active, not recruiting
A Three-Part, Open-Label, Fixed-Sequence Study to Evaluate the Effect of Multiple Doses of Itraconazole, Phenytoin, and Paroxetine on the Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Poziotinib in Healthy Adult Subjects [NCT04981704]Phase 174 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-04-08Completed
Clinical Evaluation of BRL29060A (Paroxetine Hydrochloride Hydrate) in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) - A Placebo-controlled, Single-Blind Comparative Study - [NCT00557622]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-25Terminated(stopped due to difficulty in achieving target enrollment numbers)
Dose Ranging Study of the Effect of Paroxetine on COAT-Platelet Production in Normal Volunteers and Patients With Cardiovascular Disease [NCT00229528]Phase 425 participants Interventional2004-03-31Completed
A Feasibility Study of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) of the Serotonin Transporter (SERT) Before and After Treatment With Conjugated Equine Estrogen or Paroxetine for Hot Flashes [NCT00249847]5 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Unable to complete accrual; elected to close the study in April 2008.)
Serotonin and the Upper Airway in Obstructive Sleep Apnea [NCT00100464]Phase 40 participants Interventional2000-11-30Completed
A Comparative Single Center, Randomized Neuropathic Pain Assessment Study Involving Patients With Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Receiving Treatment With Either Pregabalin or Paroxetine [NCT00291148]Phase 375 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
Multicentre, Double-blind, Randomised, Parallel Group, Placebo Controlled, Phase 3 Study of the Efficacy & Safety of Quetiapine Fumarate & Paroxetine as Monotherapy in Adult Patients With Bipolar Depression for 8 Weeks & Quetiapine in Continuation (Abbrev [NCT00119652]Phase 3676 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
Comparative Responses to 15 Different Antidepressants in Major Depressive Disorder - Results From a Long-term Nation-wide Population-based Study Emulating a Randomized Trial [NCT05952713]73,336 participants (Actual)Observational2022-10-01Completed
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Fixed Dose Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of GW597599/Paroxetine Combination or Paroxetine Monotherapy to Placebo in Patients With Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) [NCT00403962]Phase 2204 participants Interventional2004-11-30Completed
A Study of the Effects of Paroxetine vs. Duloxetine on Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Cardiovascular Control [NCT00136383]Phase 2/Phase 340 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
A Pilot Study of Double-blind Comparison of Vilazodone to Paroxetine in Geriatric Depression [NCT01608295]Phase 465 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label, 3-Period Crossover Study to Evaluate the Effect of Multiple Doses of DVS SR and Paroxetine on the CYP2D6 Biotransformation of Codeine to Morphine in Healthy Subjects. [NCT00456898]Phase 140 participants Interventional2007-01-31Completed
A Multi-Centre, Double-Blind, Randomised, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Quetiapine Fumarate Sustained Release (Seroquel SRTM) in Combination With an Antidepressant in the Treatment of Patients With Major [NCT00351910]Phase 3494 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
Duloxetine Versus Paroxetine in the Acute Treatment of Major Depression [NCT00489775]Phase 3480 participants Interventional2004-01-31Completed
SSRI Versus Bupropion in High-Risk Major Depressive Disorder [NCT01748955]Phase 415 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
Geriatric Depression: Neurobiology of Treatment [NCT00178035]Phase 4158 participants Interventional1999-12-31Completed
A Randomised, Triple Blind, Placebo-controlled Trial Comparing the Effects of Cognitive Therapy, Paroxetine and Both Cognitive Therapy and Paroxetine in the Treatment of Patients With Primary Social Phobia [NCT00184106]Phase 486 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-31Completed
Single-Site, Double-Blind, Flexible-Dose, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Efficacy, Tolerability, & Safety of Paroxetine - Controlled Release in the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) [NCT00610909]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-01-31Completed
Combination Treatment for PTSD After the WTC Attack [NCT01130103]Phase 437 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-31Completed
A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo- and Active-Controlled Study of F2695 SR in Adult Patients With Fatigue Associated With Major Depressive Disorder [NCT01254305]Phase 2262 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label, Cross-Over Drug Interaction Study to Evaluate the Effects of Desvenlafaxine (DVS SR) and Paroxetine on the Pharmacokinetics of Desipramine in Healthy Subjects [NCT00329147]Phase 320 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
A Single-Blind Trial of Risperidone vs. Paroxetine for Treatment of Panic Attacks [NCT00457106]90 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2002-06-30Completed
Randomized Trial of Paroxetine-CR for the Treatment of Patients With Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Remaining Symptomatic After Initial Exposure Therapy [NCT00121888]Phase 1/Phase 260 participants Interventional2002-12-31Completed
Biological Aspects of Depression and Antidepressant Drugs [NCT00018733]0 participants Interventional1996-09-30Completed
Treatment of Panic Disorder: Long Term Strategies [NCT00000368]Phase 3379 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-02-28Completed
Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD) [NCT00012558]5,000 participants Interventional1998-09-30Completed
A Double-Blind, Multicenter, Placebo and Active-Controlled, Acute Extension Study of 2 Doses of MK-0869 in the Treatment of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder [NCT00048607]Phase 3600 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-07-30Completed
An Open Label Study Assessing Paxil CR (Paroxetine CR) in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Who Discontinued Treatment With Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors or a Selective Serotonin/Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor Due to Intolerability [NCT00049972]Phase 4646 participants Interventional2002-09-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Fixed Dose Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Paroxetine CR in Elderly Outpatients Diagnosed With Major Depressive Disorder [NCT00067444]Phase 3560 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Cross-over Study Comparing the Effects of Both Single Dose and Repeated Dosing Treatment for 14 Days of Vestipitant or Vestipitant / Paroxetine Combination in an Enriched Population of Subjects With Tinnitus & [NCT00394056]Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
Treatment Effects on Platelet Calcium in Hypertensive and Depressed Patients [NCT00018759]Phase 40 participants Interventional2001-03-31Completed
Combined Treatment With a Benzodiazepine (Clonazepam) and a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (Paroxetine) for Rapid Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) [NCT00025740]Phase 478 participants Interventional2001-10-31Completed
Combined Treatment With A Benzodiazepine (Clonazepam) And A Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (Paroxetine) For Rapid Treatment Of Panic Disorder With Depression [NCT00031317]Phase 460 participants Interventional2002-02-28Completed
A Worldwide, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Parallel, Active-Controlled, Long-Term Safety Study of MK0869 in Outpatients With Major Depressive Disorder [NCT00034983]Phase 3900 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-10-29Completed
A Double-Blind, Multicenter, Placebo- and Active-Controlled Acute and Extension Study of MK0869 in the Treatment of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder With Melancholic Features [NCT00035009]Phase 3468 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-09-20Completed
A Randomized, Open, Three-period Crossover Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetic Profile of Paroxetine After Single Dosing of Each Enteric-coated Geomatrix Control Release Tablet Strength (12.5, 25, 37.5mg) in Healthy Chinese Subjects [NCT00406003]Phase 16 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-24Completed
A Steady-state Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetic Profile of Paroxetine After 14 Day Repeated Daily Dosing of the Controlled Release Paroxetine Tablet (25 mg) in Healthy Chinese Subjects [NCT00406432]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-09Completed
Study CRH103390: A 12 Week Flexible Dose Study of GW876008, Placebo and Active Control (Paroxetine) in the Treatment of Social Anxiety Disorder (SocAD) [NCT00397722]Phase 2299 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-09Completed
Pilot Study of Venlafaxine Extended Release (XR) in the Treatment of Panic Disorder (PD) in Comparison to Paroxetine. [NCT00195598]Phase 370 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
An 8-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Fixed-Dose Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of GW597599B or Paroxetine to Placebo in Moderately to Severely Depressed Patients With Major Depressive Disorder [NCT00048204]Phase 2372 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-11-04Completed
CBT Augmentation of Paroxetine for Social Anxiety [NCT00074802]Phase 3150 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-31Completed
Antidepressant Prophylaxis for Interferon-Induced Depression: Efficacy of Paroxetine; THE HEPDEP II STUDY [NCT00357045]Phase 40 participants InterventionalCompleted
Effects of Serotonin Transporter Inhibition on the Subjective Response to LSD in Healthy Subjects [NCT05175430]Phase 124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-24Active, not recruiting
[NCT02655354]635 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Completed
Prazosin vs. Paroxetine in Combat Stress Symptoms in OIF/OEF Returnees [NCT00261729]210 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
Phase 4 Study of Clinical Pharmacogenomics of Antidepressant Response [NCT00269334]Phase 4400 participants Interventional2005-12-31Not yet recruiting
Clinical Evaluation of BRL29060A (Paroxetine Hydrochloride Hydrate) in Social Phobia/Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) -A Open-Label, Uncontrolled, Long-term Study- [NCT00264654]Phase 350 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
Incident Type II Diabetes Mellitus Among Patients Exposed to the Combination of Pravastatin and Paroxetine [NCT01602913]1 participants (Actual)Observational2011-12-31Completed
Post-marketing Clinical Study on PAXIL Tablet in Patients With Depression or Depressive Mood - A Study on Combination of PAXIL Tablet and Benzodiazepines [NCT00259883]Phase 4150 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
Clinical Evaluation of BRL29060A (Paroxetine Hydrochloride Hydrate) in Social Phobia/Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) -A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study- [NCT00318669]Phase 3390 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
A Double-blind, Triple Dummy, Placebo-controlled, Randomised, Parallel Group Positron Emission Tomography Study to Investigate the Effects of a 8 Week Administration of GW597599 and Paroxetine Either Alone or in Combination on Regional Cerebral Blood Flow [NCT00343707]Phase 272 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-30Completed
Algorithm Guided Treatment Strategies for Major Depressive Disorder [NCT01764867]Phase 41,080 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-06-30Recruiting
Antidepressant Treatments During Pregnancy and Lactation: Prediction of Drug Exposure Through Breastfeeding and Evaluation of Drug Effect on the Neonatal Adaptation and the Development of the Young Child [NCT01796132]Phase 4500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-08-31Recruiting
The ROLE of ParoXetine in Patients Taking Telaprevir-based Hepatitis C Therapy: Lack of a Drug-drug Interaction? (ROLEX) [NCT01841502]Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Telaprevir will not be used in NL, no more inclusions are expected.)
Efficacy and Safety of Oxybutynin Versus Paroxetine in Breast Cancer Patients With Aromatase Inhibitor-induced Vasomotor Symptoms. [NCT05637671]Phase 3146 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-10Recruiting
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Cognitive-Behavior Therapy for Major Depressive Disorder [NCT01460212]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-12-31Recruiting
A Double-blind, Active-controlled, Randomized Study Comparing Mirtazapine Combined With Paroxetine or Paroxetine Monotherapy in Patients With Major Depressive Patients Without Early Improvement in the First 2 Weeks [NCT01458626]Phase 4525 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-14Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, 10-Week Placebo Controlled Fixed Dose Study of PD 0332334 and Paroxetine Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of PD 0332334 for the Treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder [NCT00836069]Phase 35 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Pfizer has terminated the execution of this protocol)
Treatment of Depression in Patients With Parkinson's Disease [NCT00062738]Phase 252 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
Effectiveness and Safety of Transcutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Premature Ejaculation Treatment [NCT04207723]120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-15Recruiting
"An Open Label, 2-part, One-sequence, 3-period Study to Evaluate Drug-drug Interactions Between DWN12088 and Nebivolol or Paroxetine in Healthy Male Volunteers" [NCT04888728]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-06-30Completed
Neurofunctional Markers of SSRI Treatment Response in PTSD [NCT00700999]Phase 465 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Efficacy of Exposure and Response Prevention(ERP) and SSRIs, and Its Predictors in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder [NCT02022709]Phase 478 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
Efficacy of Interpersonal Psychotherapy in Treatment Resistant Depression [NCT01896349]74 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-04-30Recruiting
Treatment of Pediatric OCD for SRI Partial Responders [NCT00074815]Phase 3124 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-09-30Completed
Smoking, Antidepressants, and Response to Mental Stress [NCT00218439]105 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
Evaluation of Pharmacokinetics of Paroxetine Following Single and Repeat Oral Administration of Mesafem (7.5 mg Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules in Healthy Postmenopausal Women [NCT01829919]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-31Completed
Assessing Tolerability and Efficacy of Vortioxetine Versus SSRIs in Elderly Patients With Depression: a Pragmatic, Multicenter, Open-label, Parallel-group, Superiority, Randomized Trial [NCT03779789]Phase 4362 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-01Completed
Paroxetine-mediated GRK2 Inhibition to Reduce Cardiac Remodeling After Acute Myocardial Infarction (CARE-AMI): a Randomized Controlled Pilot Study [NCT03274752]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-26Completed
An International, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled, Active-Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Sustained-Release Quetiapine Fumarate (Seroquel SR™ ) in the Treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder (SILV [NCT00322595]Phase 3800 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
Comparison of Antidepressants in the Real-World: Retrospective Cohort Study Using Big Data [NCT04446039]405,349 participants (Actual)Observational2022-07-04Completed
A Multicentre, Double-blind, Active Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Clinical Effects of Immediate Release Paroxetine and Controlled Release Paroxetine in the Treatment of Major Depression [NCT00368303]Phase 3362 participants Interventional2006-12-31Completed
Research on Standardized Electronic Cognitive Training Technique in Early Stage of Senile Depression With Cognitive Impairment [NCT05588102]128 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-18Recruiting
Clinical Study to Investigate the Effect of Administration of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) and an Opioid on Ventilation [NCT05470465]Phase 127 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-09-01Completed
Paroxetine for Comorbid Social Anxiety Disorder and Alcoholism [NCT00246441]Phase 442 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-03-31Completed
Comparative Effectiveness of Newer Antidepressants in Combination With Pregabalin for Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Controlled Randomized Study [NCT02451475]Phase 1/Phase 275 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Completed
Phase 4 Clinical Pharmacogenomics of Antidepressant Response [NCT00384020]402 participants (Actual)Observational2006-01-31Completed
Efficacy of Hydroxyzine Versus Treatment as Usual for Panic Disorder: An Eight-Week, Open Label, Pilot, Randomized Controlled Trial. [NCT05737511]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-30Not yet recruiting
Treatment of Tinnitus With Migraine Medications: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT04404439]Phase 4150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-09-26Recruiting
Pharmacovigilance in Gerontopsychiatric Patients [NCT02374567]Phase 3407 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Terminated
Endothelial, Autonomic and Pressure Effects of Paroxetine in Recent Postmenopause Women With Hot Flashes: a Randomized Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT03149419]Phase 4140 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-01Completed
Effects of Paroxetine on Cardiovascular Function in Septic Patients: a Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial [NCT05725837]Phase 292 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-10Recruiting
Neural Circuits in Women With Abuse and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder [NCT01681849]Phase 491 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
The GRK2 Inhibitor Paroxetine as a Novel Adjunct to Conventional Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients. A Proof-of-Concept, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. [NCT04757571]Phase 1/Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-01Recruiting
Effects of Treatment on Decision-making in Major Depression [NCT01916824]Phase 453 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
Secondary Prevention With Paroxetine vs. Placebo in Subthreshold Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) [NCT00560612]Phase 412 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
A Phase 1, Single-center, Open-label, Sequential Drug Interaction Study Between AVP-786 (Deuterated [d6] Dextromethorphan Hydrobromide [DM]/Quinidine Sulfate [Q]) and Paroxetine and Between AVP-786 and Duloxetine in Healthy Subjects [NCT02174822]Phase 156 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
Relative Bioavailability Study Between the Formulations: Paroxetine 25 mg Tablets With Controlled Release Manufactured by GSK Mississauga and Paroxetine 25 mg Tablets With Controlled Release Manufactured by SmithKline Beecham (Cidra), Fed Administration i [NCT01339247]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-20Completed
An Open-Label Randomized, Single-Dose, 2-way Crossover Bioequivalence Study of Paroxetine Hydrochloride 20 mg Tablets and Paxil® Under Fasting Conditions and Under Fed Conditions in Chinese Healthy Volunteers [NCT03504475]Phase 153 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-29Completed
A Pilot Study Examining the Gut Microbiota in Patients With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder vs. Healthy Controls and Following 12-weeks of Open-label Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors Treatment [NCT02285699]43 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-11-01Completed
An Open-Label, Single Arm, Dose Escalating Concentration-QT Study to Investigate the Cardiac Effects and Safety of Paroxetine in Healthy Adult Participants [NCT06065735]Phase 136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-29Not yet recruiting
A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Prazosin vs. Paroxetine in Combat Stress-Related PTSD Nightmares and Sleep Disturbance [NCT00202449]59 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Terminated(stopped due to recruitment difficulties)
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00062738 (2) [back to overview]Percent Responders
NCT00062738 (2) [back to overview]Hamilton Depression Scale
NCT00074802 (7) [back to overview]Liebowitz Self-Report Disability Scale (LSRDS)
NCT00074802 (7) [back to overview]Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS)
NCT00074802 (7) [back to overview]Quality of Life Inventory (QOLI)
NCT00074802 (7) [back to overview]Social Phobia Scale (SPS)
NCT00074802 (7) [back to overview]Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS)
NCT00074802 (7) [back to overview]Clinical Global Impression Improvement Scale (CGI-I)
NCT00074802 (7) [back to overview]Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale (BFNE)
NCT00074815 (1) [back to overview]Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS)
NCT00086190 (17) [back to overview]Change in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ) - 39 - Overall
NCT00086190 (17) [back to overview]Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
NCT00086190 (17) [back to overview]Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey - Mental Component Summary
NCT00086190 (17) [back to overview]Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey - Mental Health
NCT00086190 (17) [back to overview]Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey - Role-Emotional
NCT00086190 (17) [back to overview]Change in Snaith Clinical Anxiety Scale (CAS)
NCT00086190 (17) [back to overview]Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)
NCT00086190 (17) [back to overview]Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) - Bulbar
NCT00086190 (17) [back to overview]Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) - Motor
NCT00086190 (17) [back to overview]Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) - Tremor
NCT00086190 (17) [back to overview]Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
NCT00086190 (17) [back to overview]Change in Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II)
NCT00086190 (17) [back to overview]Change in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)
NCT00086190 (17) [back to overview]Change in Geriatric Depression Rating Scale (GDS)
NCT00086190 (17) [back to overview]Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) Scores
NCT00086190 (17) [back to overview]Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey - Vitality
NCT00086190 (17) [back to overview]Change in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ) - 39 - Emotional Well-Being
NCT00113295 (5) [back to overview]Depressive Symptoms, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
NCT00113295 (5) [back to overview]The Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q).
NCT00113295 (5) [back to overview]Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Score at Study Endpoint.
NCT00113295 (5) [back to overview]Response, Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I)
NCT00113295 (5) [back to overview]Remission (HAM-A ≤ 7)
NCT00202449 (3) [back to overview]Change in Global Trauma-related Symptom Severity and Functioning From the Clinical Global Impression of Change From Baseline to Week 12
NCT00202449 (3) [back to overview]Change in Combat Trauma-related Nightmares From the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) Recurrent Distressing Dreams Item at Week 12
NCT00202449 (3) [back to overview]Change in Sleep From the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index From Baseline to Week 12
NCT00218439 (5) [back to overview]Plasma Epinephrine Concentration Response to Stress
NCT00218439 (5) [back to overview]Plasma Norepinephrine Concentration Response to Stress
NCT00218439 (5) [back to overview]Systolic Blood Pressure Response to Stress
NCT00218439 (5) [back to overview]Heart Rate Response to Stress
NCT00218439 (5) [back to overview]Diastolic Blood Pressure Response to Stress
NCT00246441 (3) [back to overview]Drinking to Cope
NCT00246441 (3) [back to overview]Alcohol Use, Quantity and Frequency
NCT00246441 (3) [back to overview]Social Anxiety Severity
NCT00292370 (9) [back to overview]Change in Mean Q-LES-Q Score From Baseline to Endpoint.
NCT00292370 (9) [back to overview]Change in Mean Scores of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) From Baseline to Endpoint.
NCT00292370 (9) [back to overview]Change in Mean PANSS Total and Subscores From Baseline to Endpoint
NCT00292370 (9) [back to overview]Change in Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-IV Total Score.
NCT00292370 (9) [back to overview]Change in Mean Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Scores From Baseline to Endpoint.
NCT00292370 (9) [back to overview]Change in CGI-I
NCT00292370 (9) [back to overview]Change in Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX)
NCT00292370 (9) [back to overview]Change in Total Mean Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) Scores
NCT00292370 (9) [back to overview]Change in Total Mean Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS)
NCT00338962 (4) [back to overview]Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS)
NCT00338962 (4) [back to overview]Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D)
NCT00338962 (4) [back to overview]Mean Number of Side Effects
NCT00338962 (4) [back to overview]Mean Self-report Weekly Craving Via Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS)
NCT00385762 (4) [back to overview]Sperm Motility
NCT00385762 (4) [back to overview]Sperm Concentration
NCT00385762 (4) [back to overview]Sperm Morphology
NCT00385762 (4) [back to overview]Semen Volume
NCT00403455 (1) [back to overview]Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS)
NCT00420641 (23) [back to overview]Mean Change From Randomization in the MADRS Total Score Over Week 8
NCT00420641 (23) [back to overview]Mean Change From Randomization in the Motivation and Energy Inventory (MEI) 18-Item Short Form (SF) Total Score Over Week 10
NCT00420641 (23) [back to overview]Change From Randomization at the End of the Treatment Phase (Week 10) in Bech Scale (6-item of 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating [HAMD-17] Scale) Score
NCT00420641 (23) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Most Severe Suicidal Behaviour and Ideation in the Suicidal Behavior (SB) and Suicidal Ideation (SI) Subscales of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS) Over Week 10
NCT00420641 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement (CGI-I) Over Week 10
NCT00420641 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Responders and Remitters of HAMD-17 Over Week 10
NCT00420641 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Responders and Remitters of IDS-CR Over Week 10
NCT00420641 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Responders and Remitters of MADRS Over Week 10
NCT00420641 (23) [back to overview]Mean Change From Randomization at the End of the Treatment Phase (Week 10) in Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated (IDS-CR) Total Score
NCT00420641 (23) [back to overview]Mean Change From Randomization at the End of the Treatment Phase in the MADRS Total Score
NCT00420641 (23) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Satisfied With Study Medication at Week 10
NCT00420641 (23) [back to overview]Mean Change From Randomization at the End of the Treatment Phase (Week 10) in the HAMD-17 Total Score
NCT00420641 (23) [back to overview]Mean Change From Randomization in IDS- Self-Rated Version (SR) Total Score Over Week 10
NCT00420641 (23) [back to overview]Mean Change From Randomization in IDS-CR and IDS-SR 5 Item Subscale Over Week 10
NCT00420641 (23) [back to overview]Mean Change From Randomization in IDS-CR Total Score Over Week 8
NCT00420641 (23) [back to overview]Mean Change From Randomization in the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician-rated Version (QIDS-CR16) Total Score Over Week 10
NCT00420641 (23) [back to overview]Mean Change From Randomization in the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-rated Version (QIDS-SR16) Total Score Over Week 10
NCT00420641 (23) [back to overview]Mean Change From Randomization in the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire 14-item Short Form (CSFQ-14SF) Over Week 10
NCT00420641 (23) [back to overview]Mean Change From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Scale Over Week 10
NCT00420641 (23) [back to overview]Mean Change From Randomization in the HAMD-17 Scale Item 1 (Depressed Mood) Over Week 10
NCT00420641 (23) [back to overview]Mean Change From Randomization in the IDS-CR Scale Item 5 (Feeling Sad) Over Week 10
NCT00420641 (23) [back to overview]Mean Change From Randomization in the in Bech Scale (6-item of HAMD-17 Scale) Score Over Week 8
NCT00420641 (23) [back to overview]Mean Change From Randomization in the MADRS Item 2 Score (Reported Sadness) Over Week 10
NCT00429169 (4) [back to overview]Scale for Suicidal Ideation
NCT00429169 (4) [back to overview]Occurrence of Suicidal Ideation or Acts Necessitating a Change in Treatment
NCT00429169 (4) [back to overview]Go-No go Test
NCT00429169 (4) [back to overview]Brain Activity Measured by BOLD Signal With fMRI During a Reward Processing Task.
NCT00445679 (7) [back to overview]Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Scores
NCT00445679 (7) [back to overview]Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Improvement (CGI-I) Scores
NCT00445679 (7) [back to overview]Visual Analog Scale-pain Intensity (VAS-PI) Score Mean Change From Baseline
NCT00445679 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Responders With a 50% or Greater Decrease From Baseline on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, 17-item (HAM-D17)
NCT00445679 (7) [back to overview]Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score Mean Change From Baseline
NCT00445679 (7) [back to overview]Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, 6-item (HAM-D6) Score Mean Change From Baseline
NCT00445679 (7) [back to overview]Covi Anxiety Scale Score Mean Change From Baseline
NCT00557622 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Week 0 and Week 12 Z-scores for Regional Blood Flow Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) in the Left Amygdala (LA), Right Amygdala (RA), and the Medial Prefrontal Cortex (MPFC)
NCT00557622 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in CGI (Clinical Global Impression) Severity of Illness Scores at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
NCT00557622 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in CAPS-SX (Clinician-Administered Post Traumatic Stress Disorder [PTSD] Scale One Week Symptom Status Version) Total Score at Weeks 4 and 8
NCT00557622 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in CAPS-SX (Clinician-Administered Post Traumatic Stress Disorder [PTSD] Scale One Week Symptom Status Version) Relating Re-experiencing at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
NCT00557622 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in CAPS-SX (Clinician-Administered Post Traumatic Stress Disorder [PTSD] Scale One Week Symptom Status Version) Relating Increased Arousal Symptom at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
NCT00557622 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Global Improvement of 4 at Week 12
NCT00557622 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in CAPS-SX (Clinician-Administered Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Scale One Week Symptom Status Version) Total Score at Week 12
NCT00557622 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in CAPS-SX (Clinician-Administered Post Traumatic Stress Disorder [PTSD] Scale One Week Symptom Status Version) Relating Avoidance and Numbing at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
NCT00560612 (4) [back to overview]Change in Short PTSD Rating Interview Scores
NCT00560612 (4) [back to overview]Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Scores
NCT00560612 (4) [back to overview]Change in Connor Davidson Resilience Scale Scores
NCT00560612 (4) [back to overview]Change in Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) Scores
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Average 24-hour Pain Score, in Particpants With a Baseline BPI Average 24-hour Pain Score of 3 or Greater, at 12-Week Endpoint (Pain Measure)
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire, Clinical Trials 7-Day Version (HPQ), Dollars of Income Lost Due to Work Absenteeism Score at Week-12 Endpoint
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire, Clinical Trials 7-Day Version (HPQ), Dollars of Income Lost Due to Work Presenteeism (WP)Score, at Week-12 Endpoint
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in BPI Average 24 Hour Pain Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Pain Measure)
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire, Clinical Trials 7-Day Version (HPQ), Presenteeism Score, at Week-12 Endpoint
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Probability of Remission [16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR) Score Less Than or Equal to 5 at 12-Week Endpoint]
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Probability of Remission [17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) (Mood Measure) Less Than or Equal to 7 at 12-Week Endpoint]
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Retardation Subscale Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Mood Measure)
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Probability of Response [HAMD-17 Total Score (Mood Measure) Greater Than Or Equal To 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline To 12 Week Endpoint]
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in QIDS-SR Total Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Mood Measure)
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Probability of Response [QIDS-SR Total Score (Mood Measure) Greater Than Or Equal To 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline To 12 Week Endpoint]
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week-12 Endpoint
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Anxiety/Somatization Subscale Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Mood Measure)
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Bech Subscale Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Mood Measure)
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Maier Subscale Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Mood Measure)
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Sleep Subscale Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Mood Measure)
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Total Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Mood Measure)
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Week-12 Endpoint
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in SDS Social Item Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Functional Outcome Measure)
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in SDS Work/School Item Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Functional Outcome Measure)
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Family/Home Item Score at Week-12 Endpoint (Functional Outcome Measure)
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Global Functional Impairment Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Functional Outcome Measure)
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at Week-12 Endpoint
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Weight at Week-12 Endpoint
NCT00666757 (25) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire, Clinical Trials 7-Day Version (HPQ), Absenteeism at 12-Week Endpoint
NCT00677352 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Panic and Agoraphobia Scale (PAS) Total Score at the End of Treatment Phase
NCT00677352 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale Total Score at the End of Treatment Phase
NCT00677352 (7) [back to overview]Summary of Adverse Events in Tapering Phase
NCT00677352 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Panic Attack at the End of Treatment Phase
NCT00677352 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants of Responder in Clinical Global Impression (CGI) - Improvement
NCT00677352 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Summary of Adverse Events in Treatment Phase
NCT00677352 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Deterioration in Antidepressant Discontinuation Scale During Tapering Phase
NCT00700999 (1) [back to overview]Percent Change in Brain Response Measured by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
NCT00786188 (11) [back to overview]Proportion of Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Responders at Week 4 and Week 8
NCT00786188 (11) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Hot Flash Frequency at Week 4 and Week 8
NCT00786188 (11) [back to overview]Effect of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules on Improvement of Hot Flash Interference at Week 4
NCT00786188 (11) [back to overview]Asses the Effect of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules on the Interference on Sexual Functioning at Week 8
NCT00786188 (11) [back to overview]Effect of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules on Mood at Week 4
NCT00786188 (11) [back to overview]Effect of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules on BMI at Week 4 and Week 8
NCT00786188 (11) [back to overview]Proportion of Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) True Responders at Week 4 and Week 8
NCT00786188 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Climacteric Symptoms at Week 8
NCT00786188 (11) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Hot Flash Severity at Week 4 and Week 8
NCT00786188 (11) [back to overview]Effect of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules on Depression and Anxiety at Week 8
NCT00786188 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hot Flash Composite Score at Week 4 and Week 8
NCT00797966 (14) [back to overview]Change From End of Phase A (Week 8 Visit) in Mean CGI-S Score for Every Study Week Visit in Phase B Other Than the Week 14 Visit.
NCT00797966 (14) [back to overview]Change From End of Phase A (Week 8 Visit) in MADRS Total Score for Every Study Week Visit in Phase B Other Than the Week 14 Visit.
NCT00797966 (14) [back to overview]Change From End of Phase A (Week 8 Visit) for Every Study Week Visit in Phase B in Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (Self-Report) (IDS-SR) Total Score.
NCT00797966 (14) [back to overview]Change From the End of Phase A (Week 8 Visit) to the End of Phase B (Week 14 Visit) in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score.
NCT00797966 (14) [back to overview]Change From End of Phase A (Week 8 Visit) to End of Phase B (Week 14 Visit) in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Mean Score (the Mean of 3 Individual Item Scores).
NCT00797966 (14) [back to overview]Change From End of Phase A (Week 8 Visit) to End of Phase B (Week 14 Visit) in Mean Q-LES-Q-SF Item 16 Score (Overall Life Satisfaction).
NCT00797966 (14) [back to overview]Change From End of Phase A (Week 8 Visit) to End of Phase B (Week 14 Visit) in Mean Q-LES-Q-SF Item 15 Score (Satisfaction With Medication).
NCT00797966 (14) [back to overview]Change From End of Phase A (Week 8 Visit) to End of Phase B (Week 14 Visit) in Mean Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness Scale (CGI-S) Score.
NCT00797966 (14) [back to overview]Change From End of Phase A (Week 8 Visit) to End of Phase B (Week 14 Visit) in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D17) Score.
NCT00797966 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With MADRS Remission From End of Phase A (Week 8 Visit).
NCT00797966 (14) [back to overview]Change From End of Phase A (Week 8 Visit) to End of Phase B (Week 14 Visit) in Mean Quality of Life, Enjoyment, and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form (QLES-Q-SF) Subscale Score - the Overall General Subscore (Sum of First 14 Items).
NCT00797966 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With MADRS Response From End of Phase A (Week 8 Visit).
NCT00797966 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With CGI-I Response From End of Phase A (Week 8 Visit).
NCT00797966 (14) [back to overview]Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Scale (CGI-I) Score at Each Study Week Visit in Phase B.
NCT00812812 (5) [back to overview]Number of Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement (CGI-GI) Responders at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8
NCT00812812 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-SI) Score at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8
NCT00812812 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Children's Depression Rating Scale -Revised (CDRS-R) Total Score at Week 8
NCT00812812 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the CDRS-R Total Score at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6
NCT00812812 (5) [back to overview]Plasma Paroxetine Concentrations at 12 Hours and 24 Hours After Administration of Study Drug at Week 8 or Withdrawal
NCT00841659 (3) [back to overview]AUC0-inf - Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (Extrapolated)
NCT00841659 (3) [back to overview]Cmax - Maximum Observed Concentration (of Paroxetine in Plasma)
NCT00841659 (3) [back to overview]AUC0-t - Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Non-zero Concentration (Per Participant)
NCT00841698 (3) [back to overview]AUC0-inf - Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (Extrapolated)
NCT00841698 (3) [back to overview]AUC0-t - Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Non-zero Concentration (Per Participant)
NCT00841698 (3) [back to overview]Cmax - Maximum Observed Concentration (of Paroxetine in Plasma)
NCT00866294 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-SI) Scores at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8
NCT00866294 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the HAM-D Total Score at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8
NCT00866294 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of HAM-D Remitters at Weeks 4 and 8
NCT00866294 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of HAM-D Responders at Weeks 4 and 8
NCT00866294 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Responders Based on the Clinical Global Impression-Global Improvement (CGI-GI) Scores at Weeks 4 and 8
NCT00866294 (6) [back to overview]Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D; 17 Items) Total Score at Week 8
NCT01101841 (17) [back to overview]Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes Frequency From Baseline (BMI ≥32 kg/m2, Week 4 and Week 12), Median
NCT01101841 (17) [back to overview]Change in Severity of Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes From Baseline (BMI <32 kg/m2, At Week 4 and Week 12), Median
NCT01101841 (17) [back to overview]Change in Severity of Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes From Baseline (BMI ≥32 kg/m2, Week 4 and Week 12), Median
NCT01101841 (17) [back to overview]Effect of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules on Anxiety and Depression
NCT01101841 (17) [back to overview]Effect of Paroxetine Mesylate Capsules on Percent Improvement of Hot Flash Interference From Baseline at Week 4 and Week 12, Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS)
NCT01101841 (17) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Hot Flash Frequency at Week 4 and Week 12.
NCT01101841 (17) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Hot Flash Severity at Week 4 and Week 12.
NCT01101841 (17) [back to overview]Percent Responders Improvement in VMS From Baseline Using the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale.
NCT01101841 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Responders
NCT01101841 (17) [back to overview]Percent Daytime and Nighttime Responders, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
NCT01101841 (17) [back to overview]Percent Persistence of Benefit, Statistically Significant Difference in Having 50% or More Reduction Compared to Baseline at Week 24.
NCT01101841 (17) [back to overview]Assessment of Mood
NCT01101841 (17) [back to overview]BMI Change From Baseline (kg/m2), Median
NCT01101841 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX, Week 4 and Week 12) Total Score, Median
NCT01101841 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Week 4 and Week 12, Total Score, Median
NCT01101841 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Number of Awakenings Due to Hot Flashes, Median
NCT01101841 (17) [back to overview]Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes Frequency From Baseline (BMI <32 kg/m2, Week 4 and Week 12), Median
NCT01130103 (5) [back to overview]Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Scale Total Score at Week 0,5,10
NCT01130103 (5) [back to overview]Treatment Response at Weeks 5 and 10
NCT01130103 (5) [back to overview]Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS)
NCT01130103 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Met Remission Criterion
NCT01130103 (5) [back to overview]Hamilton Depression Scale 0 = no Depression Symptoms 40 = Extreme Depression Symptoms
NCT01254305 (3) [back to overview]Change in Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ), Last Observation Carried Forward
NCT01254305 (3) [back to overview]Change in Patient Global Impressions of Severity (PGI-S) for Fatigue Score
NCT01254305 (3) [back to overview]Change in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) for Fatigue Score
NCT01339247 (3) [back to overview]Cmin_ss
NCT01339247 (3) [back to overview]Cmax_ss
NCT01339247 (3) [back to overview]AUC_ss
NCT01354314 (32) [back to overview]Change in CSF 3-nitrosylated Protein Levels Between Baseline and Week 24 - Per Protocol
NCT01354314 (32) [back to overview]Neurocognitive Performance: Timed Gait - Per Protocol
NCT01354314 (32) [back to overview]Neurocognitive Performance: CalCAP, Sequential - Per Protocol
NCT01354314 (32) [back to overview]Change in CSF Ceramide Between Baseline and Week 24 (C18:0 Levels) - Intent to Treat
NCT01354314 (32) [back to overview]Neurocognitive Performance: Trail Making B - Per Protocol
NCT01354314 (32) [back to overview]Neurocognitive Performance: Trail Making B - Intent to Treat
NCT01354314 (32) [back to overview]Neurocognitive Performance: Trail Making A - Per Protocol
NCT01354314 (32) [back to overview]Neurocognitive Performance: Trail Making A - Intent to Treat
NCT01354314 (32) [back to overview]Neurocognitive Performance: Timed Gait - Intent to Treat
NCT01354314 (32) [back to overview]Neurocognitive Performance: Symbol-Digit Test - Per Protocol
NCT01354314 (32) [back to overview]Neurocognitive Performance: Symbol-Digit Test - Intent to Treat
NCT01354314 (32) [back to overview]Neurocognitive Performance: NPZ-8 - Per Protocol
NCT01354314 (32) [back to overview]Neurocognitive Performance: NPZ-8 - Intent to Treat
NCT01354314 (32) [back to overview]Neurocognitive Performance: Grooved Pegboard, Non-Dominant - Per Protocol
NCT01354314 (32) [back to overview]Neurocognitive Performance: Grooved Pegboard, Non-Dominant - Intent to Treat
NCT01354314 (32) [back to overview]Neurocognitive Performance: Grooved Pegboard, Dominant - Per Protocol
NCT01354314 (32) [back to overview]Neurocognitive Performance: Grooved Pegboard, Dominant - Intent to Treat
NCT01354314 (32) [back to overview]Neurocognitive Performance: CalCAP, Sequential - Intent to Treat
NCT01354314 (32) [back to overview]Neurocognitive Performance: CalCAP, Choice - Per Protocol
NCT01354314 (32) [back to overview]Neurocognitive Performance: CalCAP, Choice - Intent to Treat
NCT01354314 (32) [back to overview]Change in CSF sCD14 Between Baseline and Week 24 - Per Protocol
NCT01354314 (32) [back to overview]Change in CSF sCD14 Between Baseline and Week 24 - Intent to Treat
NCT01354314 (32) [back to overview]Change in CSF Neurofilament Protein Light Chain (NFL) Between Baseline and Week 24 - Per Protocol
NCT01354314 (32) [back to overview]Change in CSF Neurofilament Protein Light Chain (NFL) Between Baseline and Week 24 - Intent to Treat
NCT01354314 (32) [back to overview]Change in CSF Neurofilament Protein Heavy Chain (pNFL) Between Baseline and Week 24 - Intent to Treat
NCT01354314 (32) [back to overview]Change in CSF Neurofilament Protein Heavy Chain (pNFH) Between Baseline and Week 24 - Per Protocol
NCT01354314 (32) [back to overview]Change in CSF Ceramide Between Baseline and Week 24 (C18:0 Levels) - Per Protocol
NCT01354314 (32) [back to overview]Change in CSF CD163 Between Baseline and Week 24 - Per Protocol
NCT01354314 (32) [back to overview]Change in CSF CD163 Between Baseline and Week 24 - Intent to Treat
NCT01354314 (32) [back to overview]Change in CSF 3-nitrosylated Protein Levels Between Baseline and Week 24 - Intent to Treat
NCT01354314 (32) [back to overview]Change in CES-D Score - Per Protocol
NCT01354314 (32) [back to overview]Change in CES-D Score - Intent to Treat
NCT01360866 (5) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) of Illness Score
NCT01360866 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self Report (IDS-SR) Total Score
NCT01360866 (5) [back to overview]Adverse Events (AEs) - All Participants
NCT01360866 (5) [back to overview]Summary of Mean Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Mean Score
NCT01360866 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score
NCT01361308 (18) [back to overview]Change in Severity of Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes From Baseline (BMI ≥32 kg/m2, Week 4 and Week 12), Median
NCT01361308 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Total Number of Awakenings Due to Hot Flashes, Median
NCT01361308 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Week 4 and Week 12, Total Score, Median
NCT01361308 (18) [back to overview]BMI Change From Baseline (kg/m2), Median
NCT01361308 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Responders
NCT01361308 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Patient Global Improvement (PGI) Scale Responders (%)
NCT01361308 (18) [back to overview]Percent Responders Improvement in VMS From Baseline Using the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale.
NCT01361308 (18) [back to overview]Assessment of Mood
NCT01361308 (18) [back to overview]Percent Daytime and Nighttime Responders, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
NCT01361308 (18) [back to overview]Mean Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe VMS From Baseline at Week 4 and Week 12.
NCT01361308 (18) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Hot Flash Severity at Week 4 and Week 12
NCT01361308 (18) [back to overview]Effect of Paroxetine Mesylate Capsules on Percent Improvement of Hot Flash Interference From Baseline at Week 4 and Week 12, Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS)
NCT01361308 (18) [back to overview]Effect of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules on Anxiety and Depression
NCT01361308 (18) [back to overview]Clinical Meaningfulness Anchored to Patient Global Improvement (PGI-I) (%)
NCT01361308 (18) [back to overview]Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes Frequency From Baseline (BMI <32 kg/m2, Week 4 and Week 12), Median
NCT01361308 (18) [back to overview]Change in Severity of Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes From Baseline (BMI <32 kg/m2, At Week 4 and Week 12), Median
NCT01361308 (18) [back to overview]Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes Frequency From Baseline (BMI ≥32 kg/m2, Week 4 and Week 12), Median
NCT01361308 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX, Week 4 and Week 12) Total Score
NCT01608295 (4) [back to overview]Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)
NCT01608295 (4) [back to overview]Changes in Proinflammatory Gene Expression From Baseline to Final Visit (up to 12 Weeks)
NCT01608295 (4) [back to overview]UKU Side-effect Profile
NCT01608295 (4) [back to overview]Neurocognitive Measure: The Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test
NCT01681849 (2) [back to overview]Change in Brain Blood Flow Assessed by Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM)
NCT01681849 (2) [back to overview]Mean Clinical Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-IV (CAPS) Score
NCT01748955 (2) [back to overview]Percent Change in Contrast of Parameter Estimates (COPE)
NCT01748955 (2) [back to overview]Change in Suicidal Ideation (SSI Score)
NCT01829919 (13) [back to overview]Median t1/2 Single Dose Pharmacokinetics of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg
NCT01829919 (13) [back to overview]Mean t1/2 Single Dose Pharmacokinetics of Brisdelle™ (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg
NCT01829919 (13) [back to overview]Accumulation Index Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetics of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg at Day 19
NCT01829919 (13) [back to overview]Cavg,ss (ng/mL) Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetics of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg
NCT01829919 (13) [back to overview]Tmax (Hour) Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetics of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg
NCT01829919 (13) [back to overview]Cmax (ng/mL) Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetics of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg
NCT01829919 (13) [back to overview]AUC (Hour*ng/mL) Single Dose Pharmacokinetics of Brisdelle™ (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg
NCT01829919 (13) [back to overview]Ct (ng/mL) Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetics of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg
NCT01829919 (13) [back to overview]AUC (Hour*ng/mL) Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetics of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg
NCT01829919 (13) [back to overview]Cmin (ng/mL) Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetics of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg
NCT01829919 (13) [back to overview]Cmax (ng/mL) Single Dose Pharmacokinetics of Brisdelle™ (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg
NCT01829919 (13) [back to overview]Fluctuation Index (%) Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetics of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg
NCT01829919 (13) [back to overview]Kel (Hour^-1) Single Dose Pharmacokinetics of Brisdelle™ (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg
NCT01916824 (1) [back to overview]Money Earned
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]Brief Pain Inventory
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Over the Course of the Year After Injury
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline Patient Health Questionnaire 9 Item Depression Scale Over the Course of the Year After Injury
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline PTSD Checklist- Civilian (PCL-C) Over the Course of the Year After Injury
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline Short Form (SF)-12/36 Physical Function Over the Course of the Year After Injury
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]Cognitive Impairment Scale
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Marijuana Use
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Stimulant Use
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]SF-36 Quality of Life
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]TSOS Patient Satisfaction: Mental Health Care
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]TSOS Patient Satisfaction: Overall Health Care
NCT02655354 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Opioid Use
NCT02932904 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Meeting Criteria for Sexual Dysfunction at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5
NCT02932904 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in CSFQ-14 3 Phases of the Sexual Response Cycle (Desire, Arousal, and Orgasm/Completion) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5
NCT02932904 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in CSFQ-14 Total Score Difference for Vortioxetine Versus Placebo at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5
NCT02932904 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the CSFQ-14 Total Score Difference for Vortioxetine Versus Paroxetine at Week 5 in Modified Full Analysis Set 2 (mFAS2)
NCT02932904 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the CSFQ-14 Total Score Difference for Vortioxetine Versus Paroxetine at Week 5 in Modified Full Analysis Set 1 (mFAS1)
NCT02932904 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in CSFQ-14 Total Score Difference for Paroxetine Versus Placebo at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5
NCT02932904 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in CSFQ-14 Subscales 5 Dimensions at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5
NCT02932904 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the CSFQ-14 Total Score Difference for Vortioxetine Versus Paroxetine at Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4
NCT02932904 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ-14) Total Score Difference for Vortioxetine Versus Paroxetine at Week 5 in Full Analysis Set (FAS)
NCT03329573 (30) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Values Relative to PCI Criteria on Day 16 Under Fasting Condition
NCT03329573 (30) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Non-SAE and SAEs Under Fasting Condition
NCT03329573 (30) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Under Fed Condition
NCT03329573 (30) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Urinalysis Results by Dipstick Method Under Fasting Condition
NCT03329573 (30) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Urinalysis Results by Dipstick Method Under Fed Condition
NCT03329573 (30) [back to overview]Pulse Rate (PR) at Indicated Time-points Under Fasting Condition
NCT03329573 (30) [back to overview]Pulse Rate (PR) at Indicated Time-points Under Fed Condition
NCT03329573 (30) [back to overview]t1/2 of Paroxetine Following Single Oral Dose in Healthy Chinese Participants Under Fasting Condition
NCT03329573 (30) [back to overview]Respiratory Rate (RR) at Indicated Time-point Under Fed Condition
NCT03329573 (30) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Paroxetine Following Single Oral Dose in Healthy Chinese Participants Under Fed Condition
NCT03329573 (30) [back to overview]Lambda z of Paroxetine Following Single Oral Dose in Healthy Chinese Participants Under Fasting Condition
NCT03329573 (30) [back to overview]Cmax of Paroxetine Following Single Oral Dose in Healthy Chinese Participants Under Fasting Condition
NCT03329573 (30) [back to overview]AUC(0-t) of Paroxetine Following Single Oral Dose in Healthy Chinese Participants Under Fasting Condition
NCT03329573 (30) [back to overview]AUC(0-infinity) of Paroxetine Following Single Oral Dose in Healthy Chinese Participants Under Fasting Condition
NCT03329573 (30) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Values Relative to PCI Criteria on Day 16 Under Fed Condition
NCT03329573 (30) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUC[0-infinity]) of Paroxetine Following Single Oral Dose in Healthy Chinese Participants Under Fed Condition
NCT03329573 (30) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Chemistry Laboratory Values Relative to Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria on Day 16 Under Fed Condition
NCT03329573 (30) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Administration Extrapolated to the Last Time of Quantifiable Concentration (AUC[0-t]) of Paroxetine Following Single Oral Dose in Healthy Chinese Participants Under Fed Condition
NCT03329573 (30) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings for Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters Under Fed Condition
NCT03329573 (30) [back to overview]DBP and SBP at Indicated Time-points Under Fasting Condition
NCT03329573 (30) [back to overview]Tmax of Paroxetine Following Single Oral Dose in Healthy Chinese Participants Under Fasting Condition
NCT03329573 (30) [back to overview]Time to Reach Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Paroxetine Following Single Oral Dose in Healthy Chinese Participants Under Fed Condition
NCT03329573 (30) [back to overview]Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (Lambda z) of Paroxetine Following Single Oral Dose in Healthy Chinese Participants Under Fed Condition
NCT03329573 (30) [back to overview]Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of Paroxetine Following Single Oral Dose in Healthy Chinese Participants Under Fed Condition
NCT03329573 (30) [back to overview]Temperature at Indicated Time-point Under Fed Condition
NCT03329573 (30) [back to overview]Temperature at Indicated Time-point Under Fasting Condition
NCT03329573 (30) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Chemistry Laboratory Values Relative to PCI Criteria on Day 16 Under Fasting Condition
NCT03329573 (30) [back to overview]Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) and Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Indicated Time-points Under Fed Condition
NCT03329573 (30) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings for ECG Parameters Under Fasting Condition
NCT03329573 (30) [back to overview]RR at Indicated Time-point Under Fasting Condition
NCT04311463 (9) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Paroxetine
NCT04311463 (9) [back to overview]Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (Kel) of Paroxetine
NCT04311463 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs
NCT04311463 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of AUC (0 to Infinity) Obtained by Extrapolation (%AUCex) of Paroxetine
NCT04311463 (9) [back to overview]Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of Paroxetine
NCT04311463 (9) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUC[0-t]) of Paroxetine
NCT04311463 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT04311463 (9) [back to overview]Time of the Maximum Measured Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Paroxetine
NCT04311463 (9) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC[0-inf]) of Paroxetine

Percent Responders

Percent of patients who had a 50% decrease in total HDRS at 8 weeks (NCT00062738)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionpercent of patients who were responders (Number)
Nortriptyline53
Paroxetine11
Placebo24

[back to top]

Hamilton Depression Scale

total score on HDRS (0-54 higher score is worse) (NCT00062738)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Nortriptyline10.84
Paroxetine12.45
Placebo15.81

[back to top]

Liebowitz Self-Report Disability Scale (LSRDS)

The LSRDS is an 11-item self-report measure of the degree to which one's emotional problems limit one's ability to function in a variety of domains. Items are rated on a 0-3 scale of severity, and 10 of the 11 items (choosing either school or work as one area and omitting the other) are summed to produce a total score, ranging from 0-30. Higher scores represent greater disability. We examined amount of change at from week 12 to week 28 as a secondary outcome. Change was calculated as Week 12 score minus Week 28 score, so a positive score equals greater positive change. (NCT00074802)
Timeframe: Change measured from Week 12 to Week 28

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Paroxetine Continuation1.25
Paroxetine With CBT Augmentation-0.02

[back to top]

Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS)

The LSAS is a 24-item clinician-administered measure, which provides 0-3 ratings for anxiety and avoidance of social and performance situations. Anxiety and avoidance ratings are summed across items, yielding a range of scores from 0-144, with higher scores representing greater severity of social anxiety symptoms. We examined amount of change from week 12 to week 28 as the primary outcome. Change was calculated as Week 12 score minus Week 28 score, so a positive score equals greater positive change. (NCT00074802)
Timeframe: Change measured from Week 12 to Week 28

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Paroxetine Continuation7.77
Paroxetine With CBT Augmentation7.84

[back to top]

Quality of Life Inventory (QOLI)

The QOLI is a 16-item self-report measure of life satisfaction. Each item is rated for importance (0-2) and satisfaction (-3 to +3), and these ratings are multiplied, summed, and divided by the number of non-zero entries to yield an average item score, which can range from -6 to +6. We examined amount of change at from week 12 to week 28 as a secondary outcome. Change was calculated as Week 12 score minus Week 28 score, so a positive score equals greater positive change. (NCT00074802)
Timeframe: Change measured from Week 12 to Week 28

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Paroxetine Continuation0.25
Paroxetine With CBT Augmentation-0.35

[back to top]

Social Phobia Scale (SPS)

The SPS is a 20-item self-report measure of anxiety experienced when being observed by others. Items are rated on a 0-4 scale, yielding a range of scores from 0-80, with higher scores representing greater anxiety. We examined amount of change at from week 12 to week 28 as a secondary outcome. Change was calculated as Week 12 score minus Week 28 score, so a positive score equals greater positive change. (NCT00074802)
Timeframe: Change measured from Week 12 to Week 28

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Paroxetine Continuation2.75
Paroxetine With CBT Augmentation5.83

[back to top]

Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS)

The SIAS is a 20-item self-report measure of anxiety experienced while interacting in dyads or groups. Items are rated on a 0-4 scale, yielding a range of scores from 0-80, with higher scores representing greater anxiety. We examined amount of change at from week 12 to week 28 as a secondary outcome. Change was calculated as Week 12 score minus Week 28 score, so a positive score equals greater positive change. (NCT00074802)
Timeframe: Change measured from Week 12 to Week 28

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Paroxetine Continuation3.43
Paroxetine With CBT Augmentation5.67

[back to top]

Clinical Global Impression Improvement Scale (CGI-I)

The CGI-I is a 7-point clinician-administered scale measuring improvement in symptoms over time. Lower numbers represent greater improvement. We examined responder status (i.e., percent of patients receiving an endpoint, Week 28, rating of 1 or 2) as well as remission status (i.e., percent of patients receiving an endpoint, Week 28, rating of 1) as secondary outcomes. (NCT00074802)
Timeframe: Responder and remitter status measured at Week 28

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Responder Status72231809Responder Status72231810Remitter Status72231809Remitter Status72231810
ResponderNon-Responder
Paroxetine Continuation17
Paroxetine With CBT Augmentation28
Paroxetine Continuation12
Paroxetine With CBT Augmentation4
Paroxetine Continuation3
Paroxetine With CBT Augmentation11
Paroxetine Continuation26
Paroxetine With CBT Augmentation21

[back to top]

Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale (BFNE)

The BFNE is a 12-item self-report measure of concern about negative evaluation by others. Items are rated on a 1-5 scale, yielding scores ranging from 12-60, with higher scores indicating greater fear of negative evaluation. We examined amount of change at from week 12 to week 28 as a secondary outcome. Change was calculated as Week 12 score minus Week 28 score, so a positive score equals greater positive change. (NCT00074802)
Timeframe: Change measured from Week 12 to Week 28

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Paroxetine Continuation1.13
Paroxetine With CBT Augmentation3.91

[back to top]

Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS)

"OCD symptom severity was measured using the CY-BOCS, an interviewer-rated instrument that assess obsessions and compulsions separately on time consumed, distress, interference, degree of resistance, and control; it yields separate severity scores for obsessions and for compulsions (0 - 20), and a composite symptom severity score (0 to 40).~Consistent with signal detection analyses examining the optimal criterion for treatment response, a CY-BOCS reduction of 30% or more from baseline to week 12 was used as the criterion for RESPONSE and was the primary dichotomous outcome measure." (NCT00074815)
Timeframe: Measured at baseline and Week 12.

InterventionProportion of Participants with RESPONSE (Number)
MM + CBT0.69
MM + ICBT0.34
MM Only0.30

[back to top]

Change in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ) - 39 - Overall

Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Total. Range 0-100. Lower score indicates a better perceived health status. (NCT00086190)
Timeframe: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

InterventionChange in PDQ-39 score (Mean)
Paroxetine-8.0
Venlafaxine Extended Release-8.4
Placebo-5.3

[back to top]

Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores range from 0-21, with higher scores indicating severe sleep difficulties. (NCT00086190)
Timeframe: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

InterventionChange in PQSI score (Mean)
Paroxetine-2.1
Venlafaxine Extended Release-2.6
Placebo-1.1

[back to top]

Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey - Mental Component Summary

Short Form 36 Health Survey. Range 0-100. Higher score indicates a better perceived quality of life. (NCT00086190)
Timeframe: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

InterventionChange in SF-36 mental score (Mean)
Paroxetine11.4
Venlafaxine Extended Release9.5
Placebo4.8

[back to top]

Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey - Mental Health

Short Form 36 Health Survey - Mental Health subscale ranges from 0-100. Higher score indicates a better perceived quality of life. (NCT00086190)
Timeframe: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

InterventionChange in SF-36 Mental Health score (Mean)
Paroxetine16.7
Venlafaxine Extended Release17.4
Placebo9.7

[back to top]

Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey - Role-Emotional

Short Form 36 Health Survey - Emotional subscale ranges from 0-100. Higher score indicates a better perceived quality of life. (NCT00086190)
Timeframe: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

InterventionChange in SF-36 Role score (Mean)
Paroxetine39.5
Venlafaxine Extended Release26.9
Placebo12.7

[back to top]

Change in Snaith Clinical Anxiety Scale (CAS)

Snaith Clinical Anxiety Scale. Range 0-21. Higher scores indicate increased anxiety. Score greater than 8 indicates clinical anxiety. (NCT00086190)
Timeframe: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

InterventionChange in CAS score (Mean)
Paroxetine-3.6
Venlafaxine Extended Release-3.2
Placebo-2.4

[back to top]

Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)

Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. Higher score indicates more severe Parkinson's disease symptoms. Total maximum = 176. Mental maximum = 52, Activities of Daily Living maximum = 52, Motor maximum = 72. Minimum = 0. (NCT00086190)
Timeframe: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

InterventionChange in UPDRS score (Mean)
Paroxetine-8.7
Venlafaxine Extended Release-7.0
Placebo-4.3

[back to top]

Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) - Bulbar

Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale - Bulbar maximum score 24, minimum score of 0. Higher score indicates more severe Parkinson's disease symptoms. (NCT00086190)
Timeframe: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

InterventionChange in UPDRS-Bulbar score (Mean)
Paroxetine-1.4
Venlafaxine Extended Release-1.4
Placebo-0.5

[back to top]

Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) - Motor

Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale - Motor has a maximum score of 72, minimum score of 0. Higher score indicates more severe Parkinson's disease symptoms. (NCT00086190)
Timeframe: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

InterventionChange in UPDRS-motor score (Mean)
Paroxetine-4.3
Venlafaxine Extended Release-2.0
Placebo-1.0

[back to top]

Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) - Tremor

Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale - Tremor subscale ranges from 0-23. Higher score indicates more severe Parkinson's disease symptoms. (NCT00086190)
Timeframe: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

InterventionChange in UPDRS-tremor score (Mean)
Paroxetine0.4
Venlafaxine Extended Release0.5
Placebo-0.6

[back to top]

Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale ranges from 0-60. Higher score indicates more severe depression. 0-6 normal, 7-19 mild depression, 20-34 moderate depression, greater than 34 severe depression. (NCT00086190)
Timeframe: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

InterventionChange in MADRS score (Mean)
Paroxetine-13.6
Venlafaxine Extended Release-10.9
Placebo-6.6

[back to top]

Change in Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II)

Beck Depression Inventory II ranges from 0-63. Higher score indicates more severe depression. 0-13 minimal depression, 14-19 mild depression, 20-28 moderate depression, 29-63 severe depression. (NCT00086190)
Timeframe: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

InterventionChange in BDI-II score (Mean)
Paroxetine-9.7
Venlafaxine Extended Release-9.6
Placebo-5.2

[back to top]

Change in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)

Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Maximum score 126. Higher score indicates greater psychiatric difficulties. (NCT00086190)
Timeframe: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

InterventionChange in BPRS score (Mean)
Paroxetine-9.0
Venlafaxine Extended Release-9.8
Placebo-4.4

[back to top]

Change in Geriatric Depression Rating Scale (GDS)

Geriatric Depression Scale ranges from 0-30. Higher score indicates more severe depression. 0-9 normal, 10-19 mild depression, 20-30 severe depression. (NCT00086190)
Timeframe: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

InterventionChange in GDS score (Mean)
Paroxetine-6.9
Venlafaxine Extended Release-6.9
Placebo-2.8

[back to top]

Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) Scores

Change in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression over 12 weeks. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale ranges from 0-50. Higher scores represent more significant depression. Mild depression ranges from 8-13, moderate depression from 14-18, severe 19-22 and very severe any score over 23. (NCT00086190)
Timeframe: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

InterventionChange in HAM-D score (Mean)
Paroxetine-13.0
Venlafaxine Extended Release-11.0
Placebo-6.8

[back to top]

Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey - Vitality

Short Form 36 Health Survey - Vitality subscale ranges from 0-100. Higher score indicates a better perceived quality of life. (NCT00086190)
Timeframe: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

InterventionChange in SF-36 vitality score (Mean)
Paroxetine13.5
Venlafaxine Extended Release9.1
Placebo4.7

[back to top]

Change in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ) - 39 - Emotional Well-Being

Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) - Emotional Well-Being maximum score 24, minimum score of 0.Lower score indicates a better perceived health status. (NCT00086190)
Timeframe: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

InterventionChange in PDQ-39 Emotional score (Mean)
Paroxetine-21.4
Venlafaxine Extended Release-20.7
Placebo-10.9

[back to top]

Depressive Symptoms, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

Depressive symptoms were measured at a secondary outcome using the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Each item is scored on a scale of 1-6; The total score range is 0-60, with higher scores indicated higher levels of depression severity. (NCT00113295)
Timeframe: Week 10 (Phase 1 Endpoint) and Week 18 (Phase 2 Endpoint)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (Week 10)Endpoint (Week 18)
Placebo Augmentation of Continued Paroxetine12.3611.64
Quetiapine, 25-400mg/Day Augmentation of Continued Paroxetine11.4510.27

[back to top]

The Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q).

The 16-item Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) is used to assess quality of life changes with treatment. Total scores range from 14-70, with higher levels of satisfaction yielding higher scores. (NCT00113295)
Timeframe: Week 10 (Phase 1 Endpoint) and Week 18 (Phase 2 Endpoint)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (Week 10)Endpoint (Week 18)
Placebo Augmentation of Continued Paroxetine45.8945.11
Quetiapine, 25-400mg/Day Augmentation of Continued Paroxetine45.1346.25

[back to top]

Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Score at Study Endpoint.

"Symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder as measured by the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) at week 18/study endpoint. Each item is scored on a scale from 0 (not present) to 4 (severe) with a total score range of 0-56. Changes in HAM-A scores are calculated as the difference between the baseline HAM-A scores and scores at week 18/study endpoint.~The 14-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) (Hamilton, 1959) was developed to assess anxiety in a clinical population. It is considered a measure of general anxiety across anxiety disorders, in addition to being a gold standard measure for GAD." (NCT00113295)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 18

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 18Change
Placebo Augmentation of Continued Paroxetine15.8215.55-0.3
Quetiapine, 25-400mg/Day Augmentation of Continued Paroxetine16.2713.64-2.6

[back to top]

Response, Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I)

"Response was measured as a secondary outcome using the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I). Response was defined as a score of 1 [very much improved] or 2 [much improved] at study endpoint." (NCT00113295)
Timeframe: Week 18 (Phase 2 Endpoint)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Quetiapine, 25-400mg/Day Augmentation of Continued Paroxetine6
Placebo Augmentation of Continued Paroxetine5

[back to top]

Remission (HAM-A ≤ 7)

Remission was measured as a secondary outcome using a score of less than or equal to 7 on the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A). (NCT00113295)
Timeframe: Week 18 (Study Endpoint)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Quetiapine, 25-400mg/Day Augmentation of Continued Paroxetine4
Placebo Augmentation of Continued Paroxetine2

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Change in Sleep From the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index From Baseline to Week 12

Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index is a self-report questionnaire assessing sleep quality and disturbances over a 1-month time interval. A global score is obtained by summing the seven component subscales (total score range: 0-21). A score of 5 or less indicates good sleep quality. A score of more than 5 indicates poor sleep quality. Change is measured from Baseline to Week 12. (NCT00202449)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

Interventionscale points (Mean)
Prazosin-2.33
Paroxetine-6.44
Placebo-3.33

[back to top]

Plasma Epinephrine Concentration Response to Stress

Change in plasma epinephrine concentrations from Resting period to those observed during a speech delivered immediately after smoking a cigarette (NCT00218439)
Timeframe: After 4 weeks of paroxetine / placebo

Interventionpg / ml (Mean)
After 4 Weeks of Placebo40.98
After 4 Weeks of Paroxetine34.94

[back to top]

Plasma Norepinephrine Concentration Response to Stress

Change in plasma norepinephrine concentrations from Resting period to those observed during a speech delivered immediately after smoking a cigarette (NCT00218439)
Timeframe: After 4 weeks of paroxetine / placebo

Interventionpg / ml (Mean)
After 4 Weeks of Placebo72.31
After 4 Weeks of Paroxetine63.37

[back to top]

Systolic Blood Pressure Response to Stress

Change in systolic blood pressure from Resting period to that observed during a speech delivered immediately after smoking a cigarette (NCT00218439)
Timeframe: After 4 weeks of paroxetine / placebo

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
After 4 Weeks of Placebo16.85
After 4 Weeks of Paroxetine11.71

[back to top]

Heart Rate Response to Stress

Change in heart rate from Resting period to that observed during a speech delivered immediately after smoking a cigarette (NCT00218439)
Timeframe: After 4 weeks of paroxetine / placebo

Interventionbeats/minute (Mean)
After 4 Weeks of Placebo20.39
After 4 Weeks of Paroxetine20.02

[back to top]

Diastolic Blood Pressure Response to Stress

Change in diastolic blood pressure from Resting period to that observed during a speech delivered immediately after smoking a cigarette (NCT00218439)
Timeframe: After 4 weeks of paroxetine / placebo

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
After 4 Weeks of Placebo9.78
After 4 Weeks of Paroxetine8.07

[back to top]

Drinking to Cope

Drinking days that were related to coping with Social Anxiety determined by the TLFB- the proportion of drinking days that were reported to be due to coping with social anxiety. Minimum value is 0, maximum value is 1 Higher is worse. (NCT00246441)
Timeframe: 16 weeks treatment

Interventionproportion of drinking days (Mean)
Paroxetine.35
Placebo.21

[back to top]

Alcohol Use, Quantity and Frequency

Timeline Followback (TLFB), a validated calendar based instrument to assess number of standard drinks consumed on each day of the trial. Baseline measures were computed using past 30 days. From the TLFB, three measures were computed: 1. Proportion of days abstinent (PDA) (the number of days when no drinking occurred, divided by the number of days in the assessment period) (minimum is 0, maximum is 1) (higher score is better), 2. Drinks per drinking day (DDD) (the mean number of standard drinks consumed on a drinking day in the assessment period) (minimum is >0, maximum is infinity) (higher score is worse), 3. Proportion of Heavy Drinking Days (PHD) (the proportion of days each assessment period that a woman consumed 4 or more standard drinks/ man consumed 5 or more standard drinks) (minimum is 0, maximum is 1) (higher score is worse). (NCT00246441)
Timeframe: 16 weeks treatment

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
PDADDDPHD
Paroxetine.665.88.54
Placebo.657.00.55

[back to top]

Social Anxiety Severity

Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) - each of the two subscales, Fear and Avoidance, each have a maximum possible score of 72 (range 0 to 72). The total score ranges from 0 to 144. A higher score indicates higher severity of Social Anxiety Disorder. (NCT00246441)
Timeframe: 16 weeks treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Paroxetine87
Placebo93

[back to top]

Change in Mean Q-LES-Q Score From Baseline to Endpoint.

"Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) a self-rated 14-item questionnaire designed to assess the degree of enjoyment and satisfaction of various aspects of daily functioning. Each question is rated on a 5-point scale with scores ranging from 1 = very poor to 5 = very good. The minimum raw score on the Q-LES-Q-SF is 14, and the maximum score is 70. A lower score indicates worsening and a higher score indicates better quality of life." (NCT00292370)
Timeframe: From Baseline (week 8) to Endpoint (week 16 or termination)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline Q-LES-QEndpoint Q-LES-Q
Arm 2 OL Paroxetine + DB Placebo37.8538.22
Arm 3: OL Paroxetine + DB Quetiapine40.4441.06

[back to top]

Change in Mean Scores of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) From Baseline to Endpoint.

The PSQI is one of the most frequently used self-rated sleep questionnaire. Total score ranging from 0 to 21. Higher scores are representing worse sleep quality. (NCT00292370)
Timeframe: From Baseline (week 8) to Endpoint (week 16)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline PSQIEndpoint PSQI
Arm 2 OL Paroxetine + DB Placebo11.608.70
Arm 3: OL Paroxetine + DB Quetiapine12.6913.19

[back to top]

Change in Mean PANSS Total and Subscores From Baseline to Endpoint

Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS). A 30-item clinician administered rating scale for which positive, negative and general subscales are scored from 30 to 210 with a higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms. (NCT00292370)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 8) to Endpoint (week 16 or termination)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline Total PANSSEndpoint Total PANSS
Arm 2 OL Paroxetine + DB Placebo46.6343.92
Arm 3: OL Paroxetine + DB Quetiapine47.7642.24

[back to top]

Change in Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-IV Total Score.

The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-IV (CAPS) is described in the National Center for PTSD Instruction Manual (November 2000) as a semi-structured clinical interview designed to assess the seventeen symptoms for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) outlined in the DSM-IV, along with five associated features. Ratings are made on a 5 point continuum from the lowest frequency or intensity to the highest. Total CAPS score is a summed score that ranges from 0 to 136 where 0 is asymptomatic and higher scores equal more severe PTSD symptomatology. Also, a change in total CAPS score of 15 points was proposed as clinically significant change. (NCT00292370)
Timeframe: From baseline (week 8) to endpoint (week 16 or termination)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
CAPS Total BaselineCAPS Total Endpoint
Arm 2 OL Paroxetine + DB Placebo72.1567.90
Arm 3: OL Paroxetine + DB Quetiapine68.7851.52

[back to top]

Change in Mean Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Scores From Baseline to Endpoint.

The SDS is a brief 3-item questionnaire that was used as a self-report to assess the degree to which psychiatric symptoms have disrupted the patient's work, family/home responsibilities, and social life. Score ranging from 0 (no impairment) to 30 (most severe). (NCT00292370)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 8) to Endpoint (week 16 or termination)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline SDS-WSEndpoint SDS-WSBaseline SDS-SLEndpoint SDS-SLBaseline SDS-FLEndpoint SDS-FL
Arm 2 OL Paroxetine + DB Placebo5.074.586.675.925.855.39
Arm 3: OL Paroxetine + DB Quetiapine4.444.665.644.954.724.61

[back to top]

Change in CGI-I

Clinical Global Impressions Scale and Global Improvement Subscales (CGI-I) is a 7-point scale which was used to assess overall improvement. The scores range from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating very much improved and 7 indicating very much worse. (NCT00292370)
Timeframe: From Baseline (week 8) to Endpoint (week 16 or termination)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline CGI-IEndpoint CGI-I
Arm 2 OL Paroxetine + DB Placebo3.562.61
Arm 3: OL Paroxetine + DB Quetiapine3.362.22

[back to top]

Change in Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX)

The ASEX is a brief 5-item rating scale that assesses five global aspects of sexual dysfunction. Score is 5 and the maximum score is 30. Lower scores indicate more positive sexual experiences. (NCT00292370)
Timeframe: From Baseline (week 8) to Endpoint (week 16 or termination)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline ASEXEndpoint ASEX
Arm 2 OL Paroxetine + DB Placebo22.0021.93
Arm 3: OL Paroxetine + DB Quetiapine17.8816.94

[back to top]

Change in Total Mean Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) Scores

Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) was used as a measure of depression. Scoring is based on a 17-item scale. Eight items are scored on a 5 point scale from 0= not present to 4= severe. The scoring is based on the first 17 items. Scores of 0-7 normal, 8-13 is mild depression, 14-18 moderate depression, 19-22 severe depression and 23 and above very severe depression; the maximum score being 52 on the 17-point scale. (NCT00292370)
Timeframe: From Baseline (week 8) to Endpoint (week 16 or Termination)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline HAMDEndpoint HAMD
Arm 2 OL Paroxetine + DB Placebo14.6012.29
Arm 3: OL Paroxetine + DB Quetiapine13.849.29

[back to top]

Change in Total Mean Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS)

"The DTS is a 17-item self-rated scale that measures the frequency and the severity of DSM-IV PTSD symptoms. Items are rated on 5-point frequency (0 = not at all to 4 = every day) and severity scales (0 = not at all distressing to 4 = extremely distressing). The DTS yields a frequency score (ranging from 0 to 68), severity score (ranging from 0 to 68), and total score (ranging from 0 to 136). A higher score indicates higher frequency and severity. It can be used to make a preliminary determination about whether the symptoms meet DSM criteria for PTSD. Scores can also be calculated for each of the 3 PTSD symptom clusters (i.e., B, C, and D)." (NCT00292370)
Timeframe: From Baseline (week 8) to Endpoint (week 16 or Termination)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline DTSEndpoint DTS
Arm 2 OL Paroxetine + DB Placebo82.1984.06
Arm 3: OL Paroxetine + DB Quetiapine77.2561.50

[back to top]

Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS)

"The CAPS is the gold standard in PTSD assessment. The CAPS-5 is a 30-item structured interview that can be used to:~Make current (past month) diagnosis of PTSD Make lifetime diagnosis of PTSD Assess PTSD symptoms over the past week Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5). A higher score is associated with higher severity of PTSD. The score is interpreted as follows: 0-19=Asymptomatic/few symptoms 20-39=Sub-threshold/mild PTSD 40-59=Threshold PTSD/moderate 60-79=Severe PTSD >80=Extreme PTSD" (NCT00338962)
Timeframe: beginning of treatment (week 1), and end of treatment (13 weeks)

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Beginning of TreatmentEnd of Treatment
Desipramine and Naltrexone62.50026.751
Desipramine and Placebo77.83341.392
Paroxetine and Naltrexone73.5440.024
Paroxetine and Placebo69.81036.591

[back to top]

Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D)

The HAM-D ranges from 0 (Normal) to >23 (Very Severe Depression) (NCT00338962)
Timeframe: beginning of treatment (week 1), and end of treatment (13 weeks)

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Beginning of TreatmentEnd of Treatment
Desipramine and Naltrexone11.1958.563
Desipramine and Placebo13.1678.943
Paroxetine and Naltrexone13.2739.328
Paroxetine and Placebo10.9508.238

[back to top]

Mean Number of Side Effects

Differences in mean number of side effects reported for each group. Side effects and common adverse symptoms were evaluated by the research staff weekly, using a modified version of the ystematic Assessment for Treatment Emergent Events. The symptoms that are known to be associated with treatment with desipramine, paroxetine, and naltrexone were specifically screened or on a weekly basis. The symptoms were then clustered into the following categories: gastrointestinal, emotional, cold and flu symptoms, skin, sexual, neurological, and cardiac. (NCT00338962)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,,,
Interventionside effects (Mean)
Gastrointestinal symptomsEmotional SymptomsNeurological SymptomsCold SymptomsSkin SymptomsSexual SymptomsCardiac Symptoms
Desipramine and Naltrexone3.0523.7274.2011.891.591.737.389
Desipramine and Placebo3.6535.2484.5662.2531.057.736.356
Paroxetine and Naltrexone3.6514.8746.2122.1821.002.877.416
Paroxetine and Placebo2.6883.9635.0782.393.859.932.474

[back to top]

Mean Self-report Weekly Craving Via Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS)

The OCDS is a 14-item (rated 0-4), self-administered questionnaire for characterizing and quantifying the obsessive and compulsive cognitive aspects of craving and heavy (alcoholic) drinking, such as drinking-related thought, urges to drink, and the ability to resist those thoughts and urges. A higher total score indicates higher craving and ranges from 0-48. (NCT00338962)
Timeframe: beginning of treatment (week 1), and end of treatment (13 weeks)

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 1Week 13
Desipramine and Naltrexone18.5004.296
Desipramine and Placebo21.4587.489
Paroxetine and Naltrexone21.27310.013
Paroxetine and Placebo20.7009.690

[back to top]

Sperm Motility

percent of sperm with movement (NCT00385762)
Timeframe: 2 months post initial visit

InterventionPercent of sperm with movement (Mean)
Paroxetine50.21

[back to top]

Sperm Concentration

number of sperm per cubic centimeter of semen (NCT00385762)
Timeframe: 2 months post initial visit

Interventionnumber of sperm per cubic centimeter (Mean)
Paroxetine75

[back to top]

Sperm Morphology

percent of sperm with normal shape (NCT00385762)
Timeframe: 2 months post initial visit

Interventionpercent of sperm with normal shape (Mean)
Paroxetine20.24

[back to top]

Semen Volume

measured in mL (NCT00385762)
Timeframe: 2 months post initial visit

InterventionmL (Mean)
Paroxetine2.55

[back to top]

Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS)

The CAPS assessment is used to determine the severity of an individuals PTSD. The assessment examines Re-experiencing, Avoidance and Numbing, and Hyperarousal symptoms which total score in each of these categories are added together to achieve a total CAPS score. Scores on this assessment can range from 0-136 with 0 not having any PTSD symptoms and 136 having the most symptoms possible. The study uses this assessment at the baseline and at the end of treatment to determine the decrease in this score over the course of the study. (NCT00403455)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionChange in units on a scale (Mean)
Paroxetine Arm-21.72

[back to top]

Mean Change From Randomization in the MADRS Total Score Over Week 8

The MADRS scale measures the depression level of a participant. The total score was derived by adding the scores of the following 10 items: 1, apparent sadness; 2, reported sadness; 3, inner tension; 4, reduced sleep; 5, reduced appetite; 6, concentration difficulties; 7, lassitude; 8, inability to feel; 9, pessimistic thoughts; 10, suicidal thoughts. Each item was scored using a scale of 0 to 6 (a higher score indicates increased severity). The total score ranged from 0-60, where 0 indicated no depression and 60 indicated severely depressed. Randomization value was defined as the assessment value done on Week 0. Change from Randomization in total score was the difference between MADRS total score at the time points being analyzed (Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8) to Randomization. (NCT00420641)
Timeframe: Week 0 (Randomization) up to Week 8

,,
InterventionScore on scale (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 8
GSK372475-2.8-5.7-7.3-9.5-11.9-14.5-17.3
Paroxetine-2.8-6.6-10.1-11.4-14.9-17.3-19.1
Placebo-2.9-6.3-9.7-11.0-12.0-14.3-15.1

[back to top]

Mean Change From Randomization in the Motivation and Energy Inventory (MEI) 18-Item Short Form (SF) Total Score Over Week 10

MEI 18 item-SF questionnaire was used to measure reductions in mental energy, physical energy, and social motivation. All items use either a 7-level (0-6) or 5-level (0-4) response scale; for questions 1, 2, and 13-18, response '0' indicates lower motivation, energy and interest and responses with higher scores indicate increased motivation, energy and interest. For questions 3-12, response '0' indicates higher motivation, energy and interest and responses with higher scores indicate lower motivation, energy and interest. Items with a 5-level response scale were rescaled to 7-levels, and items were reverse-scored. Total score ranges from 0-108, where 0 indicates lower motivation, energy and interest and higher score indicates higher motivation, energy and interest. Randomization value was defined as assessment value done on Week 0. Change from Randomization in total score was difference between MEI score at individual time points being analyzed (Week 1, 4 and 10) to Randomization. (NCT00420641)
Timeframe: Week 0 (Randomization) up to Week 10

,,
InterventionScore on scale (Mean)
Week 1Week 4Week 10
GSK3724755.715.431.8
Paroxetine4.918.434.3
Placebo3.816.129.8

[back to top]

Change From Randomization at the End of the Treatment Phase (Week 10) in Bech Scale (6-item of 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating [HAMD-17] Scale) Score

The HAMD is a rating instrument for evaluating severity of symptoms of depression, was completed by the participant. The rating instrument used in this study was the 17-item version (HAM-D17). The Bech scale of the HAMD-17 is composed of 6 identified items out of the 17 items rated in HAMD-17 scale. Each item is rated on either a 3-point scale (0 to 2) or a 5-point scale (0 to 4). The following symptoms were rated on a 5-point scale (0-4): depressed mood, feeling of guilt, work and interests, psychomotor retardation, and anxiety (psychic). The following symptom was rated on a 3-point scale (0-2): somatic symptoms (general). Total score ranged from 0 to 22, with 0 indicating absence of symptoms and a higher score indicating greater severity of symptoms. Randomization value was defined as the assessment value done on Week 0. Change from Randomization in total score was the difference between Bech total score at the time point being analyzed (Week 10) to Randomization. (NCT00420641)
Timeframe: Week 0 (Randomization) and Week 10

InterventionScore on scale (Mean)
Placebo-6.2
GSK372475-7.2
Paroxetine-7.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Most Severe Suicidal Behaviour and Ideation in the Suicidal Behavior (SB) and Suicidal Ideation (SI) Subscales of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS) Over Week 10

"CSSRS is a clinician-rated scale that evaluates severity and change of suicidality by integrating both behaviour and ideation. For SB scale, participants were scored as non-suicidal (00), preparatory acts or behavior communicating ideation (01), aborted attempt (02), interrupted attempt (03) or actual attempt (04) based on the most severe score (4 being the most severe). On SI scale, participants were scored as non-suicidal (00), wish to be dead (01), non-specific active suicidal thoughts (02), active suicidal ideation with associated thoughts of methods without intent (03), active suicidal ideation with some intent to act on suicidal thoughts without clear plan (04), active suicidal ideation with plan and intent (05), based on the most severe score (5 being the most severe). For both subscales, 0 indicated absence of symptom and higher score indicated greater severity of symptom. Only those scores for which at least one participant was reported are summarized." (NCT00420641)
Timeframe: Up to Week 10

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SB, Score 00, Week 1SB, Score 00, Week 2SB, Score 00, Week 3SB, Score 00, Week 4SB, Score 00, Week 5SB, Score 00, Week 6SB, Score 00, Week 8SB, Score 00, Week 10SI, Score 00, Week 1SI, Score 01, Week 1SI, Score 02, Week 1SI, Score 03, Week 1SI, Score 04, Week 1SI, Score 00, Week 2SI, Score 01, Week 2SI, Score 02, Week 2SI, Score 03, Week 2SI, Score 04, Week 2SI, Score 00, Week 3SI, Score 01, Week 3SI, Score 02, Week 3SI, Score 03, Week 3SI, Score 00, Week 4SI, Score 01, Week 4SI, Score 02, Week 4SI, Score 03, Week 4SI, Score 00, Week 5SI, Score 01, Week 5SI, Score 02, Week 5SI, Score 03, Week 5SI, Score 00, Week 6SI, Score 01, Week 6SI, Score 02, Week 6SI, Score 03, Week 6SI, Score 00, Week 8SI, Score 01, Week 8SI, Score 03, Week 8SI, Score 05, Week 8SI, Score 00, Week 10SI, Score 01, Week 10SI, Score 02, Week 10
GSK3724751681541461401251171051011481711113811411135821126104011951011251010320010010
Paroxetine1661541511481411361331301568110148321014541114322113721113410213030112811
Placebo15014413913912913211612013014510132723013711013710212331312830111231011820

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement (CGI-I) Over Week 10

The CGI-I scale measures the improvement of psychiatric symptoms on a 7-point scale from 1-7. The scale was rated by the clinician at every visit during the treatment phase (Week 1 through Week 10/early withdrawal) of the participant's total improvement or worsening compared with that individual's condition at the start of the study (the Randomization visit , Week 0) whether or not the change is judged to be due to drug treatment. The scores indicated the following: 1= very much improved; 2= much improved; 3= minimally improved; 4= no change; 5= minimally worse; 6= much worse; 7= very much worse. The score ranged from 1-7, where 1 indicated very much improved and higher score indicated greater severity of symptoms. Randomization value was defined as the assessment value done on Week 0. Data is reported for the percentage of participants who were much improved and very much improved. (NCT00420641)
Timeframe: Up to Week 10

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 8Week 10
GSK372475417273648596975
Paroxetine520414966778382
Placebo312284045596162

[back to top]

Percentage of Responders and Remitters of HAMD-17 Over Week 10

HAMD-17 is a standardized, clinician-administered rating scale that assesses 17 items characteristically associated with major depression (symptoms such as depressed mood, work and activities, sleep, suicide, psychomotor agitation/retardation, appetite, sexual interest, anxiety, and somatic symptoms). The items of the HAMD-17 are rated on a scale of 0 to 2 or 0 to 4, and the total score ranges from 0 to 52, where 0 indicates absence of symptom and higher scores indicates more severe symptoms. Responders were defined as participants who had a >=50% reduction from randomization in HAMD-17 total Score. Percentage change from randomization was calculated as total score at post Randomization visit minus total score at Randomization visit divided by total score at Randomization visit multiplied by 100. Remitters were defined as participants with a HAMD-17 total score <=7. (NCT00420641)
Timeframe: Up to Week 10

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Responders, Week 1Responders, Week 2Responders, Week 3Responders, Week 4Responders, Week 5Responders, Week 6Responders, Week 8Responders, Week 10Remitters, Week 1Remitters, Week 2Remitters, Week 3Remitters, Week 4Remitters, Week 5Remitters, Week 6Remitters, Week 8Remitters, Week 10
GSK372475210141430334855258915202939
Paroxetine41425324254627229151626404552
Placebo381625293641512371716232835

[back to top]

Percentage of Responders and Remitters of IDS-CR Over Week 10

IDS-CR is a standardized 30-item, clinician rated scale to assess the severity of a participant's depressive symptoms. The items were rated on a 4-point scale of 0-3, where 0 indicated absence of symptom and higher score indicated greater severity of symptom. Total score of IDS-CR calculated as : either item 11 or 12 scored; either item 13 or 14 scored; if both items scored, the highest of the items was used. Total score was obtained by adding the scores of 28 items of the 30 items. Total scores range from 0-84, with a score of 0 indicating no depression and a score of 84 indicating the most severe depression. Responders were defined as participants who had a >=50% reduction from randomization in IDS-CR total Score. Percentage change from randomization was calculated as total score at post Randomization visit minus total score at Randomization visit divided by total score at Randomization visit multiplied by 100. Remitters were defined as participants with a IDS-CR total score <=14. (NCT00420641)
Timeframe: Up to Week 10

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Responders, Week 1Responders, Week 2Responders, Week 3Responders, Week 4Responders, Week 5Responders, Week 6Responders, Week 8Responders, Week 10Remitters, Week 1Remitters, Week 2Remitters, Week 3Remitters, Week 4Remitters, Week 5Remitters, Week 6Remitters, Week 8Remitters, Week 10
GSK3724753111517313750601881018213138
Paroxetine51426334458627218131627404448
Placebo481725283643503381716222835

[back to top]

Percentage of Responders and Remitters of MADRS Over Week 10

The MADRS scale measures the depression level of a participant. The total score was derived by adding the scores of the following 10 items: 1, apparent sadness; 2, reported sadness; 3, inner tension; 4, reduced sleep; 5, reduced appetite; 6, concentration difficulties; 7, lassitude; 8, inability to feel; 9, pessimistic thoughts; 10, suicidal thoughts. Each item was scored using a scale of 0 to 6 (a higher score indicates increased severity). The total score ranged from 0-60, where 0 indicated no depression and 60 indicated severely depressed. Responders were defined as participants who had a >=50% reduction from randomization in MADRS total Score. Percentage change from randomization was calculated as total score at post Randomization visit minus total score at Randomization visit divided by total score at Randomization visit multiplied by 100. Remitters were defined as participants with a MADRS total score <=11. (NCT00420641)
Timeframe: Up to Week 10

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Responders, Week 1Responders, Week 2Responders, Week 3Responders, Week 4Responders, Week 5Responders, Week 6Responders, Week 8Responders, Week 10Remitters, Week 1Remitters, Week 2Remitters, Week 3Remitters, Week 4Remitters, Week 5Remitters, Week 6Remitters, Week 8Remitters, Week 10
GSK37247531114173541546437101224334152
Paroxetine413253551637281311172238485568
Placebo3820293540445525121817283545

[back to top]

Mean Change From Randomization at the End of the Treatment Phase (Week 10) in Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated (IDS-CR) Total Score

The IDS-CR is a standardized 30-item, clinician rated scale to assess the severity of a participant's depressive symptoms. The items were rated on a 4-point scale of 0-3, where 0 indicated absence of symptom and higher score indicated greater severity of symptom. In order to calculate the total score of IDS-CR, the following procedures were used: either item 11 or 12 were scored; either item 13 or 14 were scored; if both items 11 and 12 (or 13 and 14) were scored, the highest of the items was scored. The total score was obtained by adding the scores of 28 items of the 30 items. Total scores range from 0-84, with a score of 0 indicating no depression and a score of 84 indicating the most severe depression. Randomization value was defined as the assessment value done on Week 0. Change from Randomization in total score was the difference between IDS-CR total score at the time point being analyzed (Week 10) to Randomization. (NCT00420641)
Timeframe: Week 0 (Randomization) and Week 10

InterventionScore on scale (Mean)
Placebo-22.3
GSK372475-25.1
Paroxetine-26.8

[back to top]

Mean Change From Randomization at the End of the Treatment Phase in the MADRS Total Score

The MADRS scale measures the depression level of a participant. The total score was derived by adding the scores of the following 10 items: 1, apparent sadness; 2, reported sadness; 3, inner tension; 4, reduced sleep; 5, reduced appetite; 6, concentration difficulties; 7, lassitude; 8, inability to feel; 9, pessimistic thoughts; 10, suicidal thoughts. Each item was scored using a scale of 0 to 6 (a higher score indicates increased severity). The maximum total score is 60; 0, no depression; 60, severely depressed. Randomization value was defined as the assessment value done on Week 0. Change from Randomization in total score was the difference between MADRS total score at the time point being analyzed (Week 10) to Randomization. (NCT00420641)
Timeframe: Week 0 (Randomization) and Week 10

InterventionScore on scale (Mean)
Placebo-16.9
GSK372475-19.0
Paroxetine-20.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Satisfied With Study Medication at Week 10

"Participants were asked complete the participant Satisfaction with Study Medication question at Week 10 (or early withdrawal). Satisfaction was measured using a single 7-point Likert scale from 1 to 7 where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with study medication. A score of 1 represents very dissatisfied, whilst a score of 7 represents very satisfied. Participants were categorized as a responder if they are rated either as 6 Satisfied or 7 Very Satisfied. The proportion of responders as percentage of participants based on the participant satisfaction with study medication item was defined as: number of participants with a response of 6 or 7 at the visit divided by number of participants with a satisfaction with study medication assessment at that visit (the sum of responders and non-responders) multiplied by 100." (NCT00420641)
Timeframe: Week 10

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo45
GSK37247546
Paroxetine64

[back to top]

Mean Change From Randomization at the End of the Treatment Phase (Week 10) in the HAMD-17 Total Score

HAMD-17 is a standardized, clinician-administered rating scale that assesses 17 items characteristically associated with major depression. Items of HAMD-17 are rated on a scale 3-point scale of 0-2 or a 5-point scale of 0-4 where 0 is absence of symptom and higher score indicate more severe symptom. Items rated on the 3-point scale include: insomnia early, middle, late; somatic symptoms gastrointestinal and general; genital symptoms; loss of weight; insight. Items rated on 5-point scale include: depressed mood; feelings of guilt; suicide; work and activities; retardation; agitation; anxiety psychic and somatic; hypochondriasis. Total score ranges from 0 to 52, where 0 indicates absence of symptom and higher scores indicates more severe symptoms. Randomization value was defined as the assessment value done on Week 0. Change from Randomization in total score was the difference between HAMD-17 total score at the time point being analyzed (Week 10) to Randomization. (NCT00420641)
Timeframe: Week 0 (Randomization) and Week 10

,,
InterventionScore on scale (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 8Week 10
GSK372475-1.9-4.2-4.9-6.3-7.8-9.5-11.5-12.9
Paroxetine-2.3-4.8-6.9-7.9-9.9-11.6-12.7-13.9
Placebo-1.9-4.3-6.6-7.7-8.5-9.9-10.4-11.5

[back to top]

Mean Change From Randomization in IDS- Self-Rated Version (SR) Total Score Over Week 10

The IDS-SR is a standardized 30-item, participant rated scale to assess the severity of a participant's depressive symptoms. The items were rated on a 4-point scale of 0-3, where 0 indicated absence of symptom and higher score indicated greater severity of symptom. In order to calculate the total score of IDS-SR, the following procedures were used: either item 11 or 12 were scored; either item 13 or 14 were scored; if both items 11 and 12 (or 13 and 14) were scored, the highest of the items was scored. The total score was obtained by adding the scores of 28 items of the 30 items. Total scores range from 0-84, with a score of 0 indicating no depression and a score of 84 indicating the most severe depression. Randomization value was defined as the assessment value done on Week 0. Change from Randomization in total score was the difference between IDS-SR total score at the individual time points being analyzed (Week, 1, 4 and 10) to Randomization. (NCT00420641)
Timeframe: Week 0 (Randomization) up to Week 10

,,
InterventionScore on scale (Mean)
Week 1Week 4Week 10
GSK372475-7.6-15.5-26.9
Paroxetine-8.6-19.1-30.5
Placebo-7.6-16.8-25.6

[back to top]

Mean Change From Randomization in IDS-CR and IDS-SR 5 Item Subscale Over Week 10

The IDS-CR and IDS-SR is a standardized 30-item scale rated by the clinician and the participant respectively to assess the severity of a participant's depressive symptoms. The 5 items of the IDS subscale include: item 19 (general interest/involvement), item 20 (energy/fatigability), item 21 (pleasure/enjoyment), item 22 (sexual interest), item 30 (Leaden paralysis/physical energy) which assessed participant's pleasure, interest and energy. The items were rated on a 4-point scale of 0-3, where 0 indicated absence of symptom and higher score indicated greater severity of symptom. Total score ranges from 0 to 15, where 0 indicates absence of symptom and higher scores indicates more severe symptoms. Randomization value was defined as the assessment value done on Week 0. Change from Randomization in total score was the difference between IDS 5 Item subscale total score at the individual time points being analyzed (Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10) to Randomization. (NCT00420641)
Timeframe: Week 0 (Randomization) up to Week 10

,,
InterventionScore on scale (Mean)
IDS-CR 5 Item subscale, Week 1IDS-CR 5 Item subscale, Week 2IDS-CR 5 Item subscale, Week 3IDS-CR 5 Item subscale, Week 4IDS-CR 5 Item subscale, Week 5IDS-CR 5 Item subscale, Week 6IDS-CR 5 Item subscale, Week 8IDS-CR 5 Item subscale, Week 10IDS-SR 5 Item subscale, Week 1IDS-SR 5 Item subscale, Week 2IDS-SR 5 Item subscale, Week 3IDS-SR 5 Item subscale, Week 4IDS-SR 5 Item subscale, Week 5IDS-SR 5 Item subscale, Week 6IDS-SR 5 Item subscale, Week 8IDS-SR 5 Item subscale, Week 10
GSK372475-1.2-2.5-2.9-3.5-4.3-4.8-5.6-6.2-2.5-2.1-3.4-4.7-5.9-1.0-7.0-7.6
Paroxetine-0.8-2.0-2.9-3.4-4.4-5.2-5.9-6.3-2.2-3.3-3.7-4.9-5.0-3.3-6.3-7.9
Placebo-0.8-1.6-2.6-3.1-3.8-4.4-4.8-5.3-1.3-3.00.0-3.5-0.7-2.8-2.5-6.2

[back to top]

Mean Change From Randomization in IDS-CR Total Score Over Week 8

The IDS-CR is a standardized 30-item, clinician rated scale to assess the severity of a participant's depressive symptoms. The items were rated on a 4-point scale of 0-3, where 0 indicated absence of symptom and higher score indicated greater severity of symptom. In order to calculate the total score of IDS-CR, the following procedures were used: either item 11 or 12 were scored; either item 13 or 14 were scored; if both items 11 and 12 (or 13 and 14) were scored, the highest of the items was scored. The total score was obtained by adding the scores of 28 items of the 30 items. Total scores range from 0-84, with a score of 0 indicating no depression and a score of 84 indicating the most severe depression. Randomization value was defined as the assessment value done on Week 0. Change from Randomization in total score was the difference between IDS-CR total score at the time points being analyzed (Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8) to Randomization. (NCT00420641)
Timeframe: Week 0 (Randomization) up to Week 8

,,
InterventionScore on scale (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 8
GSK372475-4.9-9.7-11.2-13.2-16.9-19.3-22.8
Paroxetine-5.1-9.8-14.3-16.2-20.1-23.4-25.2
Placebo-4.4-8.8-12.7-15.0-16.9-19.5-20.3

[back to top]

Mean Change From Randomization in the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician-rated Version (QIDS-CR16) Total Score Over Week 10

QIDS-CR16 is a 16-item rating scale of depressive symptoms rated by the clinician. The items were rated on a 4-point scale of 0-3, where 0 indicated absence of symptom and higher score indicated greater severity of symptom. Total score was obtained by adding scores of items of sad mood, interest, energy/fatigue, sleep disturbance, decrease/increase in appetite or weight, concentration/decision making, suicidal ideation and psychomotor agitation/retardation, the highest score on any 1 of the 4 sleep items, highest score on any 1 appetite/weight item and highest score on either of the 2 psychomotor items. Total scores range from 0-27, with a score of 0 indicating no depression and a score of 27 indicating most severe depression. Randomization value was defined as the assessment value done on Week 0. Change from Randomization in total score was the difference between QIDS-CR16 total score at the individual time points being analyzed (Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10) to Randomization. (NCT00420641)
Timeframe: Week 0 (Randomization) up to Week 10

,,
InterventionScore on scale (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 8Week 10
GSK372475-1.8-3.6-4.3-5.0-6.6-7.3-8.8-9.6
Paroxetine-1.8-3.4-5.3-5.9-7.4-8.6-9.4-10.0
Placebo-1.5-3.3-5.0-5.9-6.5-7.3-7.8-8.5

[back to top]

Mean Change From Randomization in the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-rated Version (QIDS-SR16) Total Score Over Week 10

QIDS-SR16 is a 16-item rating scale of depressive symptoms completed by participant. The items were rated on a 4-point scale of 0-3, where 0 indicated absence of symptom and higher score indicated greater severity of symptom. Total score was obtained by adding scores of the items of sad mood, interest, energy/fatigue, sleep disturbance, decrease/increase in appetite or weight, concentration/decision making, suicidal ideation and psychomotor agitation/retardation, the highest score on any 1 of the 4 sleep items, highest score on any 1 appetite/weight item and highest score on either of the 2 psychomotor items. Total scores range from 0-27, with a score of 0 indicating no depression and a score of 27 indicating most severe depression. Randomization value was defined as the assessment value done on Week 0. Change from Randomization in total score was the difference between QIDS-SR16 total score at the individual time points being analyzed (Week 1, 4 and 10) to Randomization. (NCT00420641)
Timeframe: Week 0 (Randomization) up to Week 10

,,
InterventionScore on scale (Mean)
Week 1Week 4Week 10
GSK372475-3.1-5.7-10.6
Paroxetine-2.9-6.9-11.6
Placebo-2.7-6.4-10.0

[back to top]

Mean Change From Randomization in the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire 14-item Short Form (CSFQ-14SF) Over Week 10

The CSFQ-14SF is a structured self reported questionnaire designed to measure illness- and medication-related changes in sexual functioning. It is consisting of 14 items that measure sexual activity and sexual functioning. It measures five dimensions of sexual behavior: pleasure (1 item); desire/frequency (items 2 and 3); desire/interest (items 4, 5 and 6); arousal (items 7, 8 and 9); and orgasm (items 11, 12 and 13). Items 10 and 14 are included in the total score but not in any dimension score. Items were rated on an 5 point scale from 1 to 5. Total score ranged from 14 to 70, where higher scores indicate higher sexual functioning and lower score indicate lower sexual functioning. Randomization value was defined as the assessment value done on Week 0. Change from Randomization in the total score was the difference between CSFQ-14SF score at the individual time points being analyzed (Week 4 and 10) to Randomization. (NCT00420641)
Timeframe: Week 0 (Randomization) up to Week 10

,,
InterventionScore on scale (Mean)
Week 4Week 10
GSK3724753.16.1
Paroxetine1.34.4
Placebo2.44.6

[back to top]

Mean Change From Randomization in the Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Scale Over Week 10

The CGI-S scale measures the severity of psychiatric symptoms on a 7-point scale from 1-7. The scores indicated the following: 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline mentally ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; 7 = among the most extremely ill participants. The score ranged from 1-7, where 1 indicated absence of symptoms and higher score indicated greater severity of symptoms. Randomization value was defined as the assessment value done on Week 0. Change from Randomization in the score was the difference between CGI-S score at the individual time points being analyzed (Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10) to Randomization. (NCT00420641)
Timeframe: Week 0 (Randomization) up to Week 10

,,
InterventionScore on scale (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 8Week 10
GSK372475-0.3-0.5-0.7-1.0-1.4-1.6-1.9-2.2
Paroxetine-0.2-0.6-1.1-1.3-1.6-2.0-2.2-2.5
Placebo-0.2-0.5-0.8-1.1-1.2-1.5-1.7-1.9

[back to top]

Mean Change From Randomization in the HAMD-17 Scale Item 1 (Depressed Mood) Over Week 10

HAMD-17 is a standardized, clinician-administered rating scale that assesses 17 items characteristically associated with major depression (symptoms such as depressed mood, work and activities, sleep, suicide, psychomotor agitation/retardation, appetite, sexual interest, anxiety, and somatic symptoms). The items of the HAMD-17 are rated on a 3-point scale of 0-2 or a 5-point scale of 0-4. The item 1 (Depressed Mood) of HAMD-17 was rated the 5-point scale of 0-4, where 0 indicates absence of symptom and higher score indicates more severe symptom. Randomization value was defined as the assessment value done on Week 0. Change from Randomization in the score was the difference between HAMD-17 Item 1 score at the individual time points being analyzed (Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10) to Randomization. (NCT00420641)
Timeframe: Week 0 (Randomization) up to Week 10

,,
InterventionScore on scale (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 8Week 10
GSK372475-0.4-0.7-0.9-1.0-1.2-1.5-1.8-2.0
Paroxetine-0.3-0.7-1.0-1.2-1.5-1.7-1.8-2.0
Placebo-0.3-0.6-1.0-1.0-1.2-1.3-1.4-1.7

[back to top]

Mean Change From Randomization in the IDS-CR Scale Item 5 (Feeling Sad) Over Week 10

The IDS-CR is a standardized 30-item, clinician rated scale to assess the severity of a participant's depressive symptoms. The item 5 (Feeling Sad) of IDS-CR was rated on a 4-point scale of 0-3, where 0 indicated absence of symptom and higher score indicated greater severity of symptom. Randomization value was defined as the assessment value done on Week 0. Change from Randomization in score was the difference between IDS-CR Item 5 score at the time points being analyzed (Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10) to Randomization. (NCT00420641)
Timeframe: Week 0 (Randomization) up to Week 10

,,
InterventionScore on scale (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 8Week 10
GSK372475-0.3-0.5-0.8-0.8-1.0-1.2-1.4-1.5
Paroxetine-0.3-0.6-0.9-1.0-1.3-1.5-1.6-1.7
Placebo-0.2-0.5-0.8-0.9-1.0-1.1-1.2-1.3

[back to top]

Mean Change From Randomization in the in Bech Scale (6-item of HAMD-17 Scale) Score Over Week 8

The HAMD is a rating instrument for evaluating severity of symptoms of depression, was completed by the participant. Rating instrument used in this study was the 17-item version (HAM-D17). The Bech scale of the HAMD-17 is composed of 6 identified items out of the 17 items rated in HAMD-17 scale. Each item is rated on either a 3-point scale (0 to 2) or a 5-point scale (0 to 4). The following symptoms were rated on a 5-point scale (0-4): depressed mood, feeling of guilt, work and interests, psychomotor retardation, and anxiety (psychic). The following symptom was rated on a 3-point scale (0-2): somatic symptoms (general). Total score ranged from 0 to 22, with 0 indicating absence of symptoms and a higher score indicating greater severity of symptoms. Randomization value was defined as the assessment value done on Week 0. Change from Randomization in total score was the difference between Bech total score at the time points being analyzed (Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8) to randomization. (NCT00420641)
Timeframe: Week 0 (Randomization) up to Week 8

,,
InterventionScore on scale (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 8
GSK372475-1.0-2.2-2.8-3.5-4.4-5.4-6.3
Paroxetine-1.2-2.6-3.8-4.3-5.6-6.5-7.2
Placebo-0.8-2.0-3.3-3.9-4.4-5.1-5.3

[back to top]

Mean Change From Randomization in the MADRS Item 2 Score (Reported Sadness) Over Week 10

The MADRS scale measures the depression level of a participant. The items of the scale include: 1, apparent sadness; 2, reported sadness; 3, inner tension; 4, reduced sleep; 5, reduced appetite; 6, concentration difficulties; 7, lassitude; 8, inability to feel; 9, pessimistic thoughts; 10, suicidal thoughts. The item 2 (Reported Sadness) of MADRS was scored using a scale 7-point scale of 0-6, where 0 indicates absence of symptom and higher score indicates increased severity of symptom. Randomization value was defined as the assessment value done on Week 0. Change from Randomization in total score was the difference between MADRS Item 2 score at the time points being analyzed (Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10) to Randomization. (NCT00420641)
Timeframe: Week 0 (Randomization) up to Week 10

,,
InterventionScore on scale (Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6Week 8Week 10
GSK372475-0.5-0.9-1.2-1.4-1.7-2.0-2.4-2.7
Paroxetine-0.4-0.9-1.5-1.6-2.1-2.4-2.6-2.9
Placebo-0.4-0.8-1.3-1.5-1.6-1.9-2.0-2.4

[back to top]

Scale for Suicidal Ideation

The clinician-rated Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (SSI) (Beck et al 1979)was used weekly for 8 weeks. It has 19 items scaled 0 (least severe) to 2 (most severe) and total score is the sum, ranging 0 to 38 (Beck et al 1979). Items measure frequency, intensity, and attitudes toward suicidal thoughts, feelings of control over them, and suicide plans. Mean score in 90 inpatients hospitalized for suicidal ideation was 9.4±8.4, versus 4.4±5.8 in outpatients as cited in the study by Beck et al, 1979. (NCT00429169)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

,
InterventionPoints on Scale for Suicidal Ideation (Mean)
BaselineWeek 8
Bupropion9.94.7
Paroxetine8.02.3

[back to top]

Occurrence of Suicidal Ideation or Acts Necessitating a Change in Treatment

Suicide attempts, other suicidal behavior, or increase in suicidal thoughts that required a change in clinical treatment. (NCT00429169)
Timeframe: Measured at Month 6

InterventionEvents (Number)
Paroxetine4
Bupropion6

[back to top]

Go-No go Test

Change in neuropsychological measure of impulsivity. Computer-based task involving induction of a dominant response tendency and testing of the subject's ability to withhold responding to less frequent non-target stimuli. (NCT00429169)
Timeframe: Measured at Baseline and Week 8

InterventionCommission errors (Mean)
Paroxetine-0.09
Bupropion-0.06

[back to top]

Brain Activity Measured by BOLD Signal With fMRI During a Reward Processing Task.

"Comparison of fMRI results at baseline and after 8 weeks of antidepressant pharmacotherapy with paroxetine vs. bupropion.~Percent change in contrast of parameter estimates (COPE). COPE is measured during Monetary Incentive Delay Task.~Task conditions are:~Reward=BOLD signal when subject wins 5 cents vs. wins 0 cents Punishment=BOLD signal when subject loses 5 cents vs. loses 0 cents" (NCT00429169)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8.

Interventionpercentage of change in COPE (Mean)
Paroxetine-0.27
Bupropion-0.95

[back to top]

Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Scores

CGI-S is a global rating scale that measures the severity of a subject's disease. Using a 7-point scale, the clinician rates the severity of the patient's mental illness at the time of the assessment, relative to the clinician's experience with subjects who have the same diagnosis (1= normal, not at all ill; 7= among the most extremely ill). (NCT00445679)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

,,,
Interventionsubjects (Number)
Final - Score 1 (Normal, not at all ill)Final - Score 2 (Borderline mentally ill)Final - Score 3 (Mildly ill)Final - Score 4 (Moderately ill)Final - Score 5 (Markedly ill)Final - Score 6 (Severely ill)Final - Score 7 (Among the most extremely ill)
DVS SR 100505346301821
DVS SR 200534734381960
DVS SR 50404953292450
Paroxetine 20424951271571

[back to top]

Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Improvement (CGI-I) Scores

CGI-I is a global rating scale that measures disease improvement. Using a 7-point scale, the clinician rates how much the subject's illness has improved or worsened relative to the baseline status (1= very much improved; 7= very much worse). (NCT00445679)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

,,,
Interventionsubjects (Number)
Final - Score 1 (Very much improved)Final - Score 2 (Much improved)Final - Score 3 (Minimally improved)Final - Score 4 (No change)Final - Score 5 (Minimally worse)Final - Score 6 (Much worse)Final - Score 7 (Very Much worse)
DVS SR 10078643417610
DVS SR 200795328261000
DVS SR 5072643616840
Paroxetine 2072593717420

[back to top]

Visual Analog Scale-pain Intensity (VAS-PI) Score Mean Change From Baseline

The VAS-PI is a self-rated visual analog scale for the assessment of pain. Scores on the VAS-PI range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). A decrease in VAS-PI overall scores indicates a subject's assessment of an improvement in pain. (NCT00445679)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
DVS SR 50-11.69
DVS SR 100-10.00
DVS SR 200-9.10
Paroxetine 20-9.52

[back to top]

Percentage of Responders With a 50% or Greater Decrease From Baseline on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, 17-item (HAM-D17)

HAM-D17 is a standardized, clinician-administered rating scale that assesses 17 items characteristically associated with major depression. Items are scored on either a 3 point (0 to 2) or a 5 point scale (0 to 4), with 0=none/absent and 4=most severe, for a maximum total score of 50. (NCT00445679)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionpercentage of responders (Number)
DVS SR 5063
DVS SR 10067
DVS SR 20063
Paroxetine 2066

[back to top]

Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score Mean Change From Baseline

Measures the overall severity of depressive symptoms. The MADRS has a 10-item checklist. Items are rated on a scale of 0-6, for a total score range of 0 (low severity of depressive symptoms) to 60 (high severity of depressive symptoms). (NCT00445679)
Timeframe: Baseline and 8 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
DVS SR 50-16.84
DVS SR 100-17.84
DVS SR 200-16.81
Paroxetine 20-16.54

[back to top]

Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, 6-item (HAM-D6) Score Mean Change From Baseline

HAM-D6: standardized, clinician-administered rating scale is a subset of the HAM-D17 that assesses 6 items associated with major depression. The scale uses HAM-D17 items 1, 2, 7, 8, 10 and 13. Item 13 is scored 0 to 2 (0=none/absent to 2=most severe) and all others are scored 0 to 4 (0=none/absent to 4=most severe). Total score ranges from 0 to 22; higher score indicates more depression. (NCT00445679)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
DVS SR 50-6.50
DVS SR 100-6.51
DVS SR 200-6.42
Paroxetine 20-6.58

[back to top]

Covi Anxiety Scale Score Mean Change From Baseline

Covi anxiety scale measures the severity of anxiety symptoms on 3 items: verbal report, behavior and somatic complaints. Each dimension is assessed using a 5-point scale: 1 = not at all, 2 = somewhat, 3 = moderately, 4 = considerably, 5 = Very much. Total score ranges from 3 to 15; higher score indicates more anxiety. (NCT00445679)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
DVS SR 50-1.23
DVS SR 100-1.28
DVS SR 200-1.17
Paroxetine 20-1.24

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Week 0 and Week 12 Z-scores for Regional Blood Flow Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) in the Left Amygdala (LA), Right Amygdala (RA), and the Medial Prefrontal Cortex (MPFC)

Change in regional blood flow (rCBF) measured by fMRI represents altered neuronal responses in PTSD patients and is considered to be the biomarker for treatment response. fMRI measures are provided as blood oxygeneration level-dependent (BOLD) signals (z-score). To trigger neuronal activation, 2 visual stimuli were used: MVA-task (consisting of MVA-related and unpleasant pictures) and face-task (consisting of a variety of facial expressions [e.g., neutral, happy, fear]). Week 0 and 12 rCBF data from 1 participant were invalid (involuntary movement in the fMRI machine); no analysis was done. (NCT00557622)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
LA: Week 0, MVA task, z-score of 6569LA: Week 0, MVA task, z-score of 2639LA: Week 0, face task, z-score of 5355LA: Week 0, face task, z-score of 2503LA: Week 12, MVA task, z-score of 2843LA: Week 12, face task, z-score of 2054RA: Week 0, MVA task, z-score of 6310RA: Week 0, MVA task, z-score of 2549RA: Week 0, face task, z-score of 4082RA: Week 0, face task, z-score of 3339RA: Week 12, MVA task, z-score of 2217RA: Week 12, face task, z-score of 2669MPFC: Week 0, MVA task, z-score of 10652MPFC: Week 0, MVA task, z-score of 3072MPFC: Week 0, face task, z-score of 6162MPFC: Week 0, face task, z-score of 5718MPFC: Week 12, MVA task, z-score of 9083MPFC: Week 12, MVA task, z-score of 3309
Paroxetine 20-50 mg/Day101000101000101000
Placebo010111010111010111

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in CGI (Clinical Global Impression) Severity of Illness Scores at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12

The participant's status was assessed using the following 8-point scale: 0, Not assessed; 1, Normal, not at all ill; 2, Borderline mentally ill; 3, Mildly ill; 4, Moderately ill; 5, Markedly ill; 6, Severely ill; 7, Among the most extremely ill patients. (NCT00557622)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Change in CGI Severity of Illness=0, Week 2Change in CGI Severity of Illness=-1, Week 2Change in CGI Severity of Illness=0, Week 4Change in CGI Severity of Illness=0, Week 6Change in CGI Severity of Illness=0, Week 8Change in CGI Severity of Illness=0, Week 10Change in CGI Severity of Illness=0, Week 12
Paroxetine 20-50 mg/Day0111111
Placebo1011111

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in CAPS-SX (Clinician-Administered Post Traumatic Stress Disorder [PTSD] Scale One Week Symptom Status Version) Total Score at Weeks 4 and 8

The Clinical-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) is a structured interview for assessing PTSD diagnostic status and symptom severity. The CAPS assesses both the frequency and intensity of individual PTSD symptoms on separate five-point (0-4) rating scales, and these ratings can be summed to create a nine-point (0-8) severity score for each symptom. The total CAPS score can range from 0 to 136, with a higher value indicating increased severity. A minus value for change from baseline indicates an improvement of symptom severity. (NCT00557622)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4 and 8

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Change in CAPS-SX total score=+7, Week 4Change in CAPS-SX total score=-4, Week 4Change in CAPS-SX total score=+10, Week 8Change in CAPS-SX total score=-10, Week 8
Paroxetine 20-50 mg/Day1010
Placebo0101

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in CAPS-SX (Clinician-Administered Post Traumatic Stress Disorder [PTSD] Scale One Week Symptom Status Version) Relating Re-experiencing at Weeks 4, 8, and 12

The Clinical-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) is a structured interview for assessing PTSD diagnostic status and symptom severity. The CAPS assesses both the frequency and intensity of individual PTSD symptoms on separate five-point (0-4) rating scales, and these ratings can be summed to create a nine-point (0-8) severity score for each symptom. The total CAPS score can range from 0 to 136, with a higher value indicating increased severity. A minus value for change from baseline indicates an improvement of symptom severity. (NCT00557622)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Change in CAPS-SX=+7, Week 4Change in CAPS-SX=-1, Week 4Change in CAPS-SX=+5, Week 8Change in CAPS-SX=-2, Week 8Change in CAPS-SX=+6, Week 12Change in CAPS-SX=-13, Week 12
Paroxetine 20-50 mg/Day101010
Placebo010101

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in CAPS-SX (Clinician-Administered Post Traumatic Stress Disorder [PTSD] Scale One Week Symptom Status Version) Relating Increased Arousal Symptom at Weeks 4, 8, and 12

The Clinical-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) is a structured interview for assessing PTSD diagnostic status and symptom severity. The CAPS assesses both the frequency and intensity of individual PTSD symptoms on separate five-point (0-4) rating scales, and these ratings can be summed to create a nine-point (0-8) severity score for each symptom. The total CAPS score can range from 0 to 136, with a higher value indicating increased severity. A minus value for change from baseline indicates an improvement of symptom severity. (NCT00557622)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Change in CAPS-SX=0, Week 4Change in CAPS-SX=-4, Week 4Change in CAPS-SX=+8, Week 8Change in CAPS-SX=-8, Week 8Change in CAPS-SX=-1, Week 12Change in CAPS-SX=-9, Week 12
Paroxetine 20-50 mg/Day101010
Placebo010101

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Global Improvement of 4 at Week 12

The participant's status was assessed using the following 8-point scale: 0, Not assessed; 1,Very much improved; 2, Much Improved; 3, Minimally improved; 4, No change; 5, Minimally worse; 6, Much worse; 7, Very much worse. (NCT00557622)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo1
Paroxetine 20-50 mg/Day1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in CAPS-SX (Clinician-Administered Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Scale One Week Symptom Status Version) Total Score at Week 12

The Clinical-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) is a structured interview for assessing PTSD diagnostic status and symptom severity. The CAPS assesses both the frequency and intensity of individual PTSD symptoms on separate five-point (0-4) rating scales, and these ratings can be summed to create a nine-point (0-8) severity score for each symptom. The total CAPS score can range from 0 to 136, with a higher value indicating increased severity. A minus value for change from baseline indicates an improvement of symptom severity. (NCT00557622)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Change from baseline in CAPS-SX=+4Change from baseline in CAPS-SX=-27
Paroxetine 20-50 mg/Day10
Placebo01

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Change From Baseline in CAPS-SX (Clinician-Administered Post Traumatic Stress Disorder [PTSD] Scale One Week Symptom Status Version) Relating Avoidance and Numbing at Weeks 4, 8, and 12

The Clinical-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) is a structured interview for assessing PTSD diagnostic status and symptom severity. The CAPS assesses both the frequency and intensity of individual PTSD symptoms on separate five-point (0-4) rating scales, and these ratings can be summed to create a nine-point (0-8) severity score for each symptom. The total CAPS score can range from 0 to 136, with a higher value indicating increased severity. A minus value for change from baseline indicates an improvement of symptom severity. (NCT00557622)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Change in CAPS-SX=0, Week 4Change in CAPS-SX=+1, Week 4Change in CAPS-SX=-3, Week 8Change in CAPS-SX=0, Week 8Change in CAPS-SX=-1, Week 12Change in CAPS-SX=-5, Week 12
Paroxetine 20-50 mg/Day101010
Placebo010101

[back to top]

Change in Short PTSD Rating Interview Scores

The SPRINT contains 8 questions which are rated on a 0-4 scale (0=not at all; 4=very much). The total score is computed from summing questions #1-8 (range=0-32). The higher the total score, the worse the symptoms. The outcome measure is the change in scores before and after treatment. That is, the baseline and Visit 6 difference scores. (NCT00560612)
Timeframe: Change in Scores (12 weeks-Baseline)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Paroxetine-3.80
Placebo-2.00

[back to top]

Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Scores

The total HADS score is presented, which is regarded as a global measure of psychological distress. The total score ranges from 0-42. Each individual question is rated on a 4 point scale (0=absent to 3 =extreme presence). The higher the score, the greater level of psychological distress. The outcome measure is the change in scores before and after treatment. That is, the baseline and Visit 6 difference scores. (NCT00560612)
Timeframe: Change in Scores (12 Weeks-Baseline)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Paroxetine-3.40
Placebo-0.17

[back to top]

Change in Connor Davidson Resilience Scale Scores

This scale measures resilience. Range of scores (0-100). A score of 0 is suggestive of no resilience, a score of 100 is suggestive of high level of resilience. The outcome measure is the change in scores before and after treatment. That is, the baseline and Visit 6 difference scores. (NCT00560612)
Timeframe: Change in Scores (12 Weeks-Baseline)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Paroxetine-0.80
Placebo-1.29

[back to top]

Change in Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) Scores

"Mean change scores in posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms. Raw scores may range from 0 (no symptoms) to 136 (severe symptoms; score of 136 is based on the first 17 CAPS items administered).~A reduced CAPS score indicates a reduction in (improvement) PTSD symptoms, while an increase in CAPS score indicates an increase (worsening) in PTSD symptoms. The outcome measure is the change in scores before and after treatment. That is, the baseline and at 12 weeks difference scores." (NCT00560612)
Timeframe: Change in Scores (12 weeks-Baseline)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Paroxetine-3.40
Placebo-5.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Average 24-hour Pain Score, in Particpants With a Baseline BPI Average 24-hour Pain Score of 3 or Greater, at 12-Week Endpoint (Pain Measure)

The BPI is a self-reported scale measuring pain severity and pain-specific interference on function on a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). The BPI average 24-hour pain measure was used to derive the overall mean change from baseline to endpoint, in those participants who had a BPI average 24-hour pain score of 3 or greater at baseline. (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-2.95
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)-2.39

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire, Clinical Trials 7-Day Version (HPQ), Dollars of Income Lost Due to Work Absenteeism Score at Week-12 Endpoint

Self-administered assessment used to determine a participant's work performance in terms of employment status, absenteeism if employed, productivity while at work, usual occupation, and annual income. Tool assesses the potential impact of change in depressive symptoms on work productivity and its associated employer costs. Scale ranges from 0 to 100% of work days in past 30 days. Absenteeism and presenteeism were combined into a measure of total lost work performance by adding absenteeism to the value ([100-absenteeism] × [100-presenteeism]). Mean change baseline to endpoint. (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventiondollars (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-3978.98
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)-1932.46

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire, Clinical Trials 7-Day Version (HPQ), Dollars of Income Lost Due to Work Presenteeism (WP)Score, at Week-12 Endpoint

WP score was calculated by taking midpoint of annual before-tax income reported on HPQ. A multiplier of 1.25 produced estimated direct & indirect (i.e. benefits) income. Annual hours expected to work were calculated from expected daily work hours, multiplied by 236 days. Hourly, indirect income was total direct + indirect income, divided by # of expected annual work hours. Indirect hours lost annually for WP=hours expected to be worked annually times WP percent, times hourly rate=dollars earned, and then subtracted from total direct + indirect income=dollars lost annually due to WP. (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

Interventiondollars (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine7250.93
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)5074.09

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in BPI Average 24 Hour Pain Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Pain Measure)

The BPI is a self-reported scale measuring pain severity and pain-specific interference on function, with scores ranging from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes). The BPI average 24-hour pain measure was used to derive the overall mean change from baseline to endpoint. (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-1.83
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)-1.43

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire, Clinical Trials 7-Day Version (HPQ), Presenteeism Score, at Week-12 Endpoint

"Self-administered assessment used to determine a participant's work performance (employment status, absenteeism if employed, productivity while at work, usual occupation, & annual income). Tool assesses the potential impact of change in depressive symptoms on work productivity & its associated employer costs using a 0-100 scale in which 0 meant doing no work at all on days spent at work and 100 meant performing at the level of a top worker. Absolute presenteeism: difference between score for self and score for average worker in same job. Mean change baseline to endpoint is reported." (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine24.56
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)20.73

[back to top]

Probability of Remission [16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR) Score Less Than or Equal to 5 at 12-Week Endpoint]

Visitwise probability of participants per treatment meeting remission criteria (QIDS-SR total score [TS]NCT00666757)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionProbability of remission (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine0.36
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)0.32

[back to top]

Probability of Remission [17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) (Mood Measure) Less Than or Equal to 7 at 12-Week Endpoint]

Visitwise percentages of participants meeting remission criteria HAMD-17 total score [TS] NCT00666757)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionProbability of remission (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine0.53
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)0.44

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Retardation Subscale Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Mood Measure)

The HAMD-17 Retardation subscale consists of Items 1, 7, 8, 14 and evaluates dysfunction in mood, work, and sexual activity, as well as overall motor retardation. Total subscale scores range from 0 (normal) to 14 (severe). (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-5.99
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)-5.49

[back to top]

Probability of Response [HAMD-17 Total Score (Mood Measure) Greater Than Or Equal To 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline To 12 Week Endpoint]

Visitwise percentages of participants meeting response criteria 50% reduction from baseline in HAMD-17 total score at 12-Week endpoint) were estimated using a categorical, pseudolike-lihood-based repeated measures approach, & included fixed, categorical effects of treatment group, visit, treatment group-by-visit interaction, & continuous, fixed covariate of baseline HAMD-17 TS. Primary analysis will be the contrast of response rates at week 12 endpoint between treatment groups, & represents estimated response rates for each treatment group had all participants completed 12 weeks of therapy. (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12-Weeks

InterventionProbability of response (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine0.73
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)0.61

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in QIDS-SR Total Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Mood Measure)

The QIDS-SR is a 16-item, participant-rated short form of the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology that assesses 9 domains: sad mood, concentration, self-outlook, suicidal ideation, involvement, energy/fatigability, sleep disturbance, appetite/weight increase/decrease and psychomotor agitation/retardation. Scores range from 0 (none) to 27 (very severe). The QIDS-SR total score was used to derive the mean change from baseline to endpoint depression. (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-13.4
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)-12.6

[back to top]

Probability of Response [QIDS-SR Total Score (Mood Measure) Greater Than Or Equal To 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline To 12 Week Endpoint]

Visitwise percentages of participants meeting response criteria (50% reduction from baseline QIDS-SR total score at 12-week endpoint) were estimated using a categorical, pseudolikelihood-based repeated measures approach, & included fixed, categorical effects of treatment group, visit, treatment group-by-visit interaction, & continuous, fixed covariate of baseline QIDS-SR. The primary analysis will be the contrast of response rates at week 12 endpoint between treatment groups, and represents estimated response rates for each treatment group had all participants completed 12 weeks of therapy. (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12-Weeks

InterventionProbability of response (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine0.71
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)0.64

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week-12 Endpoint

Mean change from baseline to endpoint in diastolic blood pressure (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-0.14
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)0.45

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Anxiety/Somatization Subscale Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Mood Measure)

HAMD-17 subscale consists of items 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, and 17 evaluates agitation, and severity of psychic and somatic manifestations of anxiety. Total subscale scores range from 0 (normal) to 18 (severe). Mean change from baseline to endpoint. (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-4.89
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)-4.24

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Bech Subscale Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Mood Measure)

HAMD-17 Bech subscale consists of items 1, 2, 7, 8, 10, and 13 used to evaluate core symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Total subscale scores range from 0 (normal) to 22 (severe). (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-9.21
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)-8.40

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Maier Subscale Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Mood Measure)

"HAMD-17 Maier Subscale consists of Items 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10 and represents the core symptoms of depression. Total subscale scores range from 0 (normal) to 24 (severe)." (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-9.01
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)-8.16

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Sleep Subscale Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Mood Measure)

The HAMD-17 Sleep Subscale consists of Items 4, 5, 6 and evaluates initial, middle, and late insomnia. Total subscale scores range from 0 (no difficulty) to 6 (difficulty). (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-2.77
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)-2.58

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HAMD-17 Total Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Mood Measure)

The HAMD-17 is a rater-administered assessment of depression severity and improvement, with total score ranges from 0 (not at all depressed) to 52 (most severely depressed). (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-17.03
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)-15.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate at Week-12 Endpoint

Mean change from baseline to endpoint in pulse rate (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

Interventionbeats per minute (bpm) (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine2.74
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)0.47

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in SDS Social Item Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Functional Outcome Measure)

The SDS is completed by the participant and is used to assess the effect of the participant's symptoms on their work/social/family life. Total scores range from 0 to 30 with higher values indicating greater disruption in the participant's work/social/family life. (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-4.69
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)-4.04

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in SDS Work/School Item Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Functional Outcome Measure)

The SDS is completed by the participant and Item 1 is used to assess the effect of the participant's symptoms on their work/school schedule. Scores range from 0 to 10 with higher values indicating greater disruption in the participant's work/school life. (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-4.52
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)-3.85

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Family/Home Item Score at Week-12 Endpoint (Functional Outcome Measure)

The SDS is completed by the participant and Item 3 is used to assess the effect of the participant's symptoms on their family life/home responsibilities. Scores range from 0 to 10 with higher values indicating greater disruption in the participant's family life/home responsibilities. (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-4.51
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)-3.94

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Global Functional Impairment Score at 12-Week Endpoint (Functional Outcome Measure)

The SDS is a participant-rated anchored visual analog scale to assess disability across the three domains of work/school, social life, and family life, with each item scored from 0 (not at all) to 10 (very severely), with a summarization of the 3 items to evaluate global functioning. The Global Functional Impairment Score is a total score score that ranges from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired), and was used to derived the mean change from baseline to endpoint. (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-13.56
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)-11.53

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at Week-12 Endpoint

Mean change from baseline to endpoint in systolic blood pressure (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

Interventionmillimeters of mmercury (mmHg) (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine0.58
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)0.55

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Weight at Week-12 Endpoint

Mean change from baseline to endpoint in weight (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

Interventionkilograms (kg) (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-0.32
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)-0.17

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire, Clinical Trials 7-Day Version (HPQ), Absenteeism at 12-Week Endpoint

Self-administered assessment used to determine a subject's work performance in terms of employment status, absenteeism if employed, productivity while at work, usual occupation, and annual income. Tool assesses the potential impact of change in depressive symptoms on work productivity and its associated employer costs. Defined on a 0-100 scale for the percentage of work days the respondent missed in the past 30 days. Absolute absenteeism: actual hours worked minus expected hours equals number of missed work days. Mean change baseline to endpoint is reported. (NCT00666757)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 Weeks

Interventionhours lost per week (Least Squares Mean)
Duloxetine-9.56
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)0.41

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Panic and Agoraphobia Scale (PAS) Total Score at the End of Treatment Phase

Panic and Agoraphobia Scale has 13 items with a 5-point scale (range: 0 to 4). The total possible score is ranged from 0 to 52. The increasing value are considered worse outcome. The scale is grouped into 5 subscores (not including item U in total score): panic attacks ; agoraphobia/avoidance behavior ; anticipatory anxiety; disability; and health worries. Four point difference in reduction of the PAS total score has been identified as not clinically meaningful in the assessment of Panic Disorder symptomatology. (NCT00677352)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

InterventionScores on scale (Least Squares Mean)
Sertraline-17.4
Paroxetine-17.0

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale Total Score at the End of Treatment Phase

"The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale provided a 5-point intensity rating (0=None to 4=Very severe) of anxiety symptoms in 14 items.~The increasing values are considered worse outcome. The total possible score is ranged from 0 to 52." (NCT00677352)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Sertraline-11.35
Paroxetine-10.36

[back to top]

Summary of Adverse Events in Tapering Phase

Number of subjects with all causality adverse events, serious adverse events, severe adverse events, adverse events resulted in discontinuation, dose reduced or temporary discontinuation. Subjects were counted only once per treatment in each row. (NCT00677352)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Subjects with adverse eventsSubjects with serious adverse eventsSubjects with severe adverse eventsSubjects discontinued due to adverse eventsDose reduced or temporary discontinuation
Paroxetine8701640
Sertraline7311110

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Panic Attack at the End of Treatment Phase

Panic attacks were defined as having four or more of the following Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders symptoms. Palpitations or increased heart rate, Sweating, Trembling or shaking, Shortness of breath or smothering sensations, Choking, Chest pain or discomfort, Nausea or upset stomach, Dizziness, unsteady feelings or faintness, Feeling unlike yourself, or detached from a situation and/or like things happening around you are strange and unreal, Fear of going crazy or doing something uncontrolled, Fear of dying, Abnormal sense, Hot flashes or chills. (NCT00677352)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

Interventionpanic attacks per week (Mean)
Sertraline-4.07
Paroxetine-4.59

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants of Responder in Clinical Global Impression (CGI) - Improvement

"The ratings were rated to compare with baseline by 7-point 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, 7 = very much worse.~Responder was defined as number of participants who were assessed as very much improved or much improved." (NCT00677352)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Sertraline83.5
Paroxetine85.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Summary of Adverse Events in Treatment Phase

Number of sparticipants with all causality adverse events, serious adverse events, severe adverse events, adverse events resulted in discontinuation, dose reduced or temporary discontinuation. Participants were counted only once per treatment in each row. (NCT00677352)
Timeframe: 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 10 and 12 weeks (or study discontinuation) after administration of study drug

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Subjects with adverse eventsSubjects with serious adverse eventsSubjects with severe adverse eventsSubjects discontinued due to adverse eventsDose reduced or temporary discontinuation
Paroxetine1341142314
Sertraline127131413

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Deterioration in Antidepressant Discontinuation Scale During Tapering Phase

The percentage of participants divided was calcurated as follows: Devide the number of participants who had experienced new symptoms in Week 16, regardless of causal relationship with the study drug, or worsening of the severity in Week 16 compared with Week 12, by total number of participants in each treatment group. (NCT00677352)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Sertraline59.7
Paroxetine76.3

[back to top]

Percent Change in Brain Response Measured by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)

Mean percent change in brain response in the prefrontal cortex during an emotion reappraisal task in the treatment (paroxetine) group and in the Combat Exposed Control group. Target areas are analyzed from fMRI scans which were completed before participants receive treatment and again after participants received 12 weeks of treatment with paroxetine (20-40mg QD). Combat Exposed Control participants received an fMRI scan after signing initial consent and again 12 weeks later. (NCT00700999)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

Interventionpercent change in BOLD signal (Mean)
Treatment (Paroxetine) Group-.92
Combat Exposed Control.07

[back to top]

Proportion of Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Responders at Week 4 and Week 8

The Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGIS) was completed by the investigator and was used to measure the severity of the VMS at any given time and the improvement from baseline. Responders were defined as subjects who achieved a score of 1 to 3 where 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, and 3 = minimally improved. Non-responders were defined as subjects who achieved a score of 4 to 7 where 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse. (NCT00786188)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 8

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4Week 8
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules73.9164.58
Placebo - Sugar Pill60.0054.90

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Hot Flash Frequency at Week 4 and Week 8

"The number of hot flashes reported in the result table are:~Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe VMS from baseline to Week 4~Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe VMS from baseline to Week 8. They are both measured as hot flashes per week." (NCT00786188)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 8

,
InterventionHot flashes (Mean)
BaselineWeek 4Week 8
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules82.4437.342.2
Placebo - Sugar Pill83.1828.535.5

[back to top]

Effect of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules on Improvement of Hot Flash Interference at Week 4

"Interference of hot flashes was measured by using the Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS). The HFRDIS is a 10-item scale that measures the degree to which hot flashes interfere with 9 daily activities and the tenth item measures the degree to which hot flashes interfere with each of the other items. Subjects can score for each item on a scale from 0 to 10 where 0 = Do not interfere and a score of 10 = Completely interferes.~The measure being reported below is percentage of responders who had an improvement in HFRDIS score at Week 4 compared to baseline. A responder is defined as a subject who had an improvement in the HFRDIS score. An improvement is define as a score ≤3 on each question." (NCT00786188)
Timeframe: Week 4

Interventionpercentage of responders (Number)
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules12
Placebo - Sugar Pill11

[back to top]

Asses the Effect of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules on the Interference on Sexual Functioning at Week 8

The Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX) is a 5-item rating scale that quantifies sex drive, arousal, vaginal lubrication/penile erection, ability to reach orgasm, and satisfaction from orgasm. Possible total scores range from 5 to 30, with the higher scores indicating more sexual dysfunction. The sum of the scores for all 5 items was calculated. (NCT00786188)
Timeframe: Week 8

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 8
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules17.9818.00
Placebo - Sugar Pill17.3318.15

[back to top]

Effect of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules on Mood at Week 4

"Mood was measured using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) Questionnaire. The Profile of Moods States (POMS) is a 65-item multi-dimensional measure that provides a method of assessing transient, fluctuating active mood states. Key areas that are measured include: tension-anxiety, anger-hostility, fatigue-inertia, depression-dejection, vigor-activity, confusion-bewilderment. Responses to questions are scored with the following numerical values: Not at all = 1, A little = 2, Moderate = 3, Quite a bit = 4, Extremely = 5. A total score for a domain was obtained by summing the responses of individual items in the domain. The total POMS score can range from 65 to 335.~The percentage of participants who had a change from baseline in the total score at Week 4 is reported below." (NCT00786188)
Timeframe: Week 4

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules21
Placebo - Sugar Pill18

[back to top]

Effect of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules on BMI at Week 4 and Week 8

Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated by using height in centimeters and weight in kilograms. (NCT00786188)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 8

,
InterventionBMI Kg/m2 (Mean)
BaselineWeek 4Week 8
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules27.8528.1427.73
Placebo - Sugar Pill27.6927.9128.04

[back to top]

Proportion of Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) True Responders at Week 4 and Week 8

"The Subject Impression Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) is an 11-point scale was used to measure how bothered a subject was by hot flashes both during the day and the night.~The measure being reported below is percentage of responders who had an improvement in NRS score at Week 4 compared to baseline. A responder is defined as a subject who had an improvement in the NRS score. An improvement is define as a score ≤3 on each question." (NCT00786188)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 8

,
InterventionPercentage of true responders (Number)
Week 4Week 8
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules33.3337.14
Placebo - Sugar Pill16.6721.95

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Climacteric Symptoms at Week 8

"The Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) was used for this measurement. The scale has 21 questions and measures symptoms in 4 areas; these are psychological (anxiety and depression), physical, vasomotor, and libido.~The severity of the symptom was scored as: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. Anxiety was determined by using the sum of scores 1 to 6, and depression was determined by using the sum of scores 7 to 11. Physical aspects were determined by using the sum of scores 12 to 18; vasomotor aspects were determined by using the sum of scores 19 to 20; and libido was determined by using the score for question 21.~The total GCS score ranges from 0 to 63 which is the sum of all the scores for the 21-symptom assessment questions in this scale. Each subject's total GCS score at baseline and at Week 8 were used to calculate change from baseline in these symptoms. The change from baseline is reported below." (NCT00786188)
Timeframe: Week 8

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 8
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules16.6312.31
Placebo - Sugar Pill17.3312.67

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Hot Flash Severity at Week 4 and Week 8

"A scale was not used to measure severity scores. Severity scores of hot flashes were calculated for each subject. The following formula was used to calculate severity.~SS = (2•Fm + 3•Fs) ÷ (Fm + Fs)~Where:~SS = severity score Fm = frequency of moderate hot flashes Fs = frequency of severe hot flashes The mean number of moderate and severe hot flashes that was recorded in the Run-In Period was used to calculate the baseline severity score." (NCT00786188)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 8

,
InterventionSeverity score (Mean)
BaselineWeek 4Week 8
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules2.5700.1280.133
Placebo - Sugar Pill2.5390.0720.066

[back to top]

Effect of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules on Depression and Anxiety at Week 8

"Depression & anxiety were measured using the Hospital Anxiety & Depression Scale (HADS).~The HADS is a scale developed to assess anxiety & depression. The HADS Scale consists of 14 Questions (7 relating to anxiety; 7 relating to depression) with possible scores ranging from 0 to 21.~The results presented below are the number of participants with abnormal HADS Scores for both Abnormal Anxiety & Abnormal Depression combined at Week 8." (NCT00786188)
Timeframe: Week 8

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
BaselineWeek 4Week 8
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules200
Placebo - Sugar Pill111

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hot Flash Composite Score at Week 4 and Week 8

"A scale was not used for this measurement.~Composite scores of hot flashes were calculated by using the following formula:~CS = (2 • Fm + 3 • Fs)~Where:~CS = composite score Fm = frequency of moderate hot flashes Fs = frequency of severe hot flashes The mean number of moderate and severe hot flashes recorded in the Run-In Period was used to calculate the baseline composite score." (NCT00786188)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 8

,
InterventionComposite score (Mean)
BaselineWeek 4Week 8
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules211.9114.7102.6
Placebo - Sugar Pill213.0136.4119.2

[back to top]

Change From End of Phase A (Week 8 Visit) in Mean CGI-S Score for Every Study Week Visit in Phase B Other Than the Week 14 Visit.

CGI-S items are: 0 = not assessed, 1 = normal, not at all ill, 2 = borderline mentally ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill patients. The score 0 (= not assessed) was set to missing. The CGI-S was therefore a 7-point scale from 1 through 7. CGI-S was assessed at screening, baseline and each subsequent visit from Week 1 through Week 14. (NCT00797966)
Timeframe: Week 8 to each of Week 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13.

,,,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Week 9 (N=62,117,116,121)Week 10 (N=62,119,118,126)Week 11 (N=62,119,118,126)Week 12 (N=62,119,118,126)Week 13 (N=62,119,118,126)
OPC-34712 0.15 mg Fixed Dose-0.21-0.42-0.53-0.76-0.74
OPC-34712 0.5 ± 0.25 mg Low Dose-0.26-0.39-0.53-0.66-0.78
OPC-34712 1.5 ± 0.5 mg High Dose-0.33-0.61-0.69-0.86-0.88
Placebo-0.21-0.40-0.47-0.52-0.59

[back to top]

Change From End of Phase A (Week 8 Visit) in MADRS Total Score for Every Study Week Visit in Phase B Other Than the Week 14 Visit.

"The MADRS is utilized as the primary efficacy assessment of a patient's level of depression. The MADRS consists of 10 items, all rated on a 0 to 6 scale with 0 being the best rating and 6 being the worst rating. The MADRS Total Score is the sum of ratings for all 10 items. The possible Total scores are from 0 to 60. The MADRS Total Score was unevaluable if less than 8 of the 10 items are recorded. If 8 or 9 of the 10 items were recorded, the MADRS Total Score was the mean of the recorded items multiplied by 10 and then rounded to the first decimal place." (NCT00797966)
Timeframe: Week 8 to each of Week 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13.

,,,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Week 9 (N=61,117,116,121)Week 10 (N=62,119,118,126)Week 11 (N=62,119,118,126)Week 12 (N=62,119,118,126)Week 13 (N=62,119,118,126)
OPC-34712 0.15 mg Fixed Dose-2.13-3.69-5.53-6.97-6.90
OPC-34712 0.5 ± 0.25 mg Low Dose-3.00-3.78-5.71-6.31-6.76
OPC-34712 1.5 ± 0.5 mg High Dose-2.75-4.97-5.88-7.01-7.18
Placebo-2.48-3.64-4.40-4.41-5.47

[back to top]

Change From End of Phase A (Week 8 Visit) for Every Study Week Visit in Phase B in Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (Self-Report) (IDS-SR) Total Score.

"The IDS-SR is a 30-item self-report measure used to assess core diagnostic depressive symptoms as well as atypical and melancholic symptom features of major depressive disorders. The IDS-SR consists of 30 items, all rated on a 0 to 3 scale with 0 being the best rating and 3 being the worst rating. The IDS-SR Total Score is the sum of ratings of 28 item scores. The possible IDS-SR Total Score ranges from 0 to 84. The IDS-SR Total Score was un-evaluable if less than 23 of the 28 items are recorded. If the number of items was at least 23 and at most 27, the IDS-SR Total Score will be the mean of the recorded items multiplied by 28 and then rounded to the first decimal place." (NCT00797966)
Timeframe: Week 8 to each of Week 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14

,,,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Week 9 (N=61, 117,116,121)Week 10 (N=62, 119, 118, 126)Week 11 (N=62, 119, 118, 126)Week 12 (N=62, 119, 118, 126)Week 13 (N=62, 119, 118, 126)Week 14 (N=62, 119, 118, 126)
OPC-34712 0.15 mg Fixed Dose-0.98-2.13-3.58-5.11-5.34-5.55
OPC-34712 0.5 ± 0.25 mg Low Dose-1.88-2.58-3.41-3.77-5.22-4.96
OPC-34712 1.5 ± 0.5 mg High Dose-2.04-4.08-4.82-5.77-5.65-6.74
Placebo-0.98-1.62-2.09-2.07-2.37-3.08

[back to top]

Change From the End of Phase A (Week 8 Visit) to the End of Phase B (Week 14 Visit) in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score.

"The MADRS is utilized as the primary efficacy assessment of a participant's level of depression. The MADRS consists of 10 items, all rated on a 0 to 6 scale with 0 being the best rating and 6 being the worst rating. The MADRS Total Score is the sum of ratings for all 10 items. The possible Total scores are from 0 to 60. The MADRS Total Score was unevaluable if less than 8 of the 10 items are recorded. If 8 or 9 of the 10 items were recorded, the MADRS Total Score was the mean of the recorded items multiplied by 10 and then rounded to the first decimal place." (NCT00797966)
Timeframe: Week 8 to Week 14

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
OPC-34712 0.15 mg Fixed Dose-6.62
OPC-34712 0.5 ± 0.25 mg Low Dose-6.46
OPC-34712 1.5 ± 0.5 mg High Dose-8.23
Placebo-6.09

[back to top]

Change From End of Phase A (Week 8 Visit) to End of Phase B (Week 14 Visit) in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Mean Score (the Mean of 3 Individual Item Scores).

The Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) is a self-rated instrument used to measure the effect of the participant's symptoms on work/school, social life, and family/home responsibilities. For each of the three items, scores range from 0 through 10. The number most representative of how much each area was disrupted by symptoms is marked along the line from 0 = not at all, to 10 = extremely. For the work/school item, no response was to be entered if the participant did not work or go to school for reasons unrelated to the disorder and a response therefore not being applicable. The Mean SDS Score will be calculated over the three item scores. All three item scores need to be available with the exception of the work/school item score when this item is not applicable. (NCT00797966)
Timeframe: Week 8 to Week 14

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
OPC-34712 0.15 mg Fixed Dose-0.84
OPC-34712 0.5 ± 0.25 mg Low Dose-0.80
OPC-34712 1.5 ± 0.5 mg High Dose-1.27
Placebo-0.61

[back to top]

Change From End of Phase A (Week 8 Visit) to End of Phase B (Week 14 Visit) in Mean Q-LES-Q-SF Item 16 Score (Overall Life Satisfaction).

The Q-LES-Q (Short Form) is a self-report measure designed to enable physicians to easily obtain sensitive measures of the degree of enjoyment and satisfaction experienced by participants in various areas of daily functioning. Each item is scored on a five-point scale, with 1= Very Poor; 2=Poor; 3=Fair; 4=Good; 5=Very Good. Lower scores indicating less enjoyment or satisfaction with the activity. According to the scoring system suggested for this questionnaire, item 16 (Overall Life Satisfaction) will yield a separate subscore. (NCT00797966)
Timeframe: Week 8 to Week 14

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
OPC-34712 0.15 mg Fixed Dose0.30
OPC-34712 0.5 ± 0.25 mg Low Dose0.30
OPC-34712 1.5 ± 0.5 mg High Dose0.35
Placebo0.28

[back to top]

Change From End of Phase A (Week 8 Visit) to End of Phase B (Week 14 Visit) in Mean Q-LES-Q-SF Item 15 Score (Satisfaction With Medication).

The Q-LES-Q (Short Form) is a self-report measure designed to enable physicians to easily obtain sensitive measures of the degree of enjoyment and satisfaction experienced by participants in various areas of daily functioning. Each item is scored on a five-point scale, with 1= Very Poor; 2=Poor; 3=Fair; 4=Good; 5=Very Good. Lower scores indicating less enjoyment or satisfaction with the activity. According to the scoring system suggested for this questionnaire, item 15 (Satisfaction with Medication) will yield a separate subscore. (NCT00797966)
Timeframe: Week 8 to Week 14

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
OPC-34712 0.15 mg Fixed Dose0.02
OPC-34712 0.5 ± 0.25 mg Low Dose0.01
OPC-34712 1.5 ± 0.5 mg High Dose0.02
Placebo0.00

[back to top]

Change From End of Phase A (Week 8 Visit) to End of Phase B (Week 14 Visit) in Mean Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness Scale (CGI-S) Score.

CGI-S items are: 0 = not assessed, 1 = normal, not at all ill, 2 = borderline mentally ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill patients. The score 0 (= not assessed) was set to missing. The CGI-S was therefore a 7-point scale from 1 through 7. CGI-S was assessed at screening, baseline and each subsequent visit from Week 1 through Week 14. (NCT00797966)
Timeframe: Week 8 to Week 14

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
OPC-34712 0.15 mg Fixed Dose-0.83
OPC-34712 0.5 ± 0.25 mg Low Dose-0.81
OPC-34712 1.5 ± 0.5 mg High Dose-1.06
Placebo-0.71

[back to top]

Change From End of Phase A (Week 8 Visit) to End of Phase B (Week 14 Visit) in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D17) Score.

"The HAM-D17 is utilized as a secondary assessment of a participant's level of depression. The HAM-D (17-Item) consists of 17 items. Eight items are rated on a 0 to 2 scale (items 4, 5, 6, 12, 13, 14, 16 and 17), while nine items (items 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 15) are rated on a 0 to 4 scale (twice the weight of the other items). For all of these items, 0 is the best rating and the highest score (2 or 4) is the worst rating. The possible total scores are from 0 to 52." (NCT00797966)
Timeframe: Week 8 to Week 14

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
OPC-34712 0.15 mg Fixed Dose-5.77
OPC-34712 0.5 ± 0.25 mg Low Dose-5.28
OPC-34712 1.5 ± 0.5 mg High Dose-6.59
Placebo-5.23

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With MADRS Remission From End of Phase A (Week 8 Visit).

A MADRS remission was defined as MADRS Total Score /= 50% reduction in MADRS Total Score from end of Phase A (Week 8 visit). (NCT00797966)
Timeframe: Week 8 to each of Week 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.

,,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Week 9 (N=61, 117, 116, 121)Week 10 (N=62, 119, 118, 126)Week 11 (N=62, 119, 118, 126)Week 12 (N=62, 119, 118, 126)Week 13 (N=62, 119, 118, 126)Week 14 (N=62, 119, 118, 126)
OPC-34712 0.15 mg Fixed Dose3.288.0612.921.019.422.6
OPC-34712 0.5 ± 0.25 mg Low Dose1.715.0410.110.116.815.1
OPC-34712 1.5 ± 0.5 mg High Dose1.7210.214.419.515.323.7
Placebo4.138.7311.110.315.113.5

[back to top]

Change From End of Phase A (Week 8 Visit) to End of Phase B (Week 14 Visit) in Mean Quality of Life, Enjoyment, and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form (QLES-Q-SF) Subscale Score - the Overall General Subscore (Sum of First 14 Items).

The Q-LES-Q is a self-report measure to enable physicians to obtain sensitive measures of the degree of enjoyment and satisfaction experienced by participants in various areas of daily functioning. Each item is scored on a five-point scale, with 1= Very Poor; 2=Poor; 3=Fair; 4=Good; 5=Very Good. Lower scores indicating less enjoyment or satisfaction with the activity. The Overall-General Subscore will be defined by summing the scores on all 14 items and expressing it as the percent of the maximum possible score. When expressing the total score as a percentage, if items are left blank the range will be modified to reflect the number of items scored. Raw score is sum of non-missing ratings from items 1 to 14. Minimum score is number of non-missing items. Maximum score is 5*(minimum score). Range is maximum score minus minimum score. Total score is 100*(Raw score minus minimum score)/ Range, rounded to nearest integer. (NCT00797966)
Timeframe: Week 8 to Week 14

InterventionPercentage of maximum possible score (Least Squares Mean)
OPC-34712 0.15 mg Fixed Dose7.60
OPC-34712 0.5 ± 0.25 mg Low Dose6.53
OPC-34712 1.5 ± 0.5 mg High Dose7.46
Placebo5.92

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With MADRS Response From End of Phase A (Week 8 Visit).

A MADRS response was defined as >/= 50% reduction in MADRS Total Score from end of Phase A (Week 8 visit). (NCT00797966)
Timeframe: Week 8 to each of Week 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.

,,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Week 9 (N=61, 117, 116, 121)Week 10 (N=62, 119, 118, 126)Week 11 (N=62, 119, 118, 126)Week 12 (N=62, 119, 118, 126)Week 13 (N=62, 119, 118, 126)Week 14 (N=62, 119, 118, 126)
OPC-34712 0.15 mg Fixed Dose4.928.0619.430.624.227.4
OPC-34712 0.5 ± 0.25 mg Low Dose6.848.4015.115.122.720.2
OPC-34712 1.5 ± 0.5 mg High Dose2.5911.018.625.425.434.7
Placebo8.269.5213.511.918.319.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With CGI-I Response From End of Phase A (Week 8 Visit).

CGI-I response is defined as CGI-I of 1 [very much improved] or 2 [much improved]. (NCT00797966)
Timeframe: Week 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 9 (N=62, 117, 116, 121)Week 10 (N=62, 119, 118, 126)Week 11 (N=62, 119, 118, 126)Week 12 (N=62, 119, 118, 126)Week 13 (N=62, 119, 118, 126)Week 14 (N=62, 119, 118, 126)
OPC-34712 0.15 mg Fixed Dose16.125.832.335.537.138.7
OPC-34712 0.5 ± 0.25 mg Low Dose11.117.629.433.637.037.0
OPC-34712 1.5 ± 0.5 mg High Dose14.724.635.642.449.252.5
Placebo14.927.029.431.733.341.3

[back to top]

Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Scale (CGI-I) Score at Each Study Week Visit in Phase B.

CGI-I items are: 0 = not assessed, 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, 7 = very much worse. The score of 0 (= not assessed) will be set to missing. The CGI-I is therefore a 7-point scale from 1 through 7. CGI-I was assessed at each visit in Phase B, and improvement is judged with respect to the participant's condition at baseline. CGI-I was also assessed at each visit in Phase B, but in that phase improvement is judged with respect to the partcipant's condition at the end of Phase A. (NCT00797966)
Timeframe: Week 8 to each of Week 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.

,,,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Week 9 (N=62, 117, 116, 121)Week 10 (N=62, 119, 118, 126)Week 11 (N=62, 119, 118, 126)Week 12 (N=62, 119, 118, 126)Week 13 (N=62, 119, 118, 126)Week 14 (N=62, 119, 118, 126)
OPC-34712 0.15 mg Fixed Dose3.393.162.942.872.852.74
OPC-34712 0.5 ± 0.25 mg Low Dose3.303.193.022.902.762.78
OPC-34712 1.5 ± 0.5 mg High Dose3.202.952.802.702.642.52
Placebo3.313.112.942.952.902.83

[back to top]

Number of Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement (CGI-GI) Responders at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8

CGI-GI is assessed on an 8-grade scale: 0, not assessed; 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; and 7, very much worse. CGI-GI was assessed by the investigator. Participants who were rated as 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) were categorized as CGI-GI responders. (NCT00812812)
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Week 1, n=27, 29Week 2, n=26, 29Week 3, n=24, 28Week 4, n=25, 27Week 6, n=24, 26Week 8 (OC), n=24, 25Week 8 (LOCF), n=27, 29
Paroxetine47912131415
Placebo44713121111

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-SI) Score at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8

CGI-SI is assessed on an 8-grade scale: 0, not assessed; 1, normal, not at all ill; 2, borderline mentally ill; 3, mildly ill; 4, moderately ill; 5, markedly ill; 6, severely ill; and 7, among the most extremely ill. CGI-SI was assessed by the investigator. The change from Baseline in CGI-SI score was calculated as the score at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 minus the score at Baseline. (NCT00812812)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Week 1, n=27, 29Week 2, n=26, 29Week 3, n=24, 28Week 4, n=25, 27Week 6, n=24, 26Week 8 (OC), n=24, 25Week 8 (LOCF), n=27, 29
Paroxetine-0.2-0.5-0.6-0.7-0.8-1.0-0.9
Placebo-0.1-0.1-0.3-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Children's Depression Rating Scale -Revised (CDRS-R) Total Score at Week 8

The CDRS-R has been widely used for the evaluation of children and adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD). The CDRS-R total score is the sum of the responses to 17 questions. Each question is graded on a 5- or 7-point scale. The highest possible score is 113 (the most severe measure of depression), and the lowest is 17 (not suffering from depression). CDRS-R scores were assessed by the investigator. The change from Baseline in the CDRS-R total score was calculated as the total score at Week 8 minus the total score at Baseline. The data were adjusted with the total score at Baseline. (NCT00812812)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-11.9
Paroxetine-16.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the CDRS-R Total Score at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6

The CDRS-R has been widely used for the evaluation of children and adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD). The CDRS-R total score is the sum of the responses to 17 questions. Each question is graded on a 5- or 7-point scale. The highest possible score is 113 (the most severe measure of depression), and the lowest is 17 (not suffering from depression). CDRS-R scores were assessed by the investigator. The change from Baseline in the CDRS-R total score was calculated as the total score at Week 8 minus the total score at Baseline. The data were adjusted with the total score at Baseline. (NCT00812812)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 1, n=27, 29Week 2, n=26, 29Week 3, n=24, 28Week 4, n=25, 27Week 6, n=24, 26
Paroxetine-5.4-8.8-12.0-14.6-15.7
Placebo-4.6-4.9-10.6-12.5-14.2

[back to top]

Plasma Paroxetine Concentrations at 12 Hours and 24 Hours After Administration of Study Drug at Week 8 or Withdrawal

Summary statistics for the plasma paroxetine concentrations at each time point were calculated by the dosage just before blood sampling using data from participants in whom plasma samples were collected at either 12 hours (plus or minus 2 hours) or 24 hours (plus or minus 2 hours) after the last administration of the study drug at Week 8 or Withdrawal (up to Week 8). (NCT00812812)
Timeframe: Week 8 or Withdrawal (up to Week 8)

Interventionnanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean)
paroxetine 10 mg, 12 hours, n=4paroxetine 10 mg, 24 hours, n=3paroxetine 20 mg, 12 hours, n=1paroxetine 20 mg, 24 hours, n=3paroxetine 30 mg, 12 hours, n=2paroxetine 40 mg, 12 hours, n=3paroxetine 40 mg, 24 hours, n=2
Paroxetine4.46838.971349.582018.271364.4285108.913367.9855

[back to top]

AUC0-inf - Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (Extrapolated)

Bioequivalence based on AUC0-inf (NCT00841659)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over 120 hour period

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Paroxetine797.53
Paxil®873.69

[back to top]

Cmax - Maximum Observed Concentration (of Paroxetine in Plasma)

Bioequivalence based on Cmax (NCT00841659)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over 120 hour period

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Paroxetine24.66
Paxil®24.22

[back to top]

AUC0-t - Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Non-zero Concentration (Per Participant)

Bioequivalence based on AUC0-t (NCT00841659)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over 120 hour period

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Paroxetine741.41
Paxil®787.19

[back to top]

AUC0-inf - Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (Extrapolated)

Bioequivalence based on AUC0-inf (NCT00841698)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over 120 hour period

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Paroxetine653.84
Paxil®673.45

[back to top]

AUC0-t - Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time of Last Non-zero Concentration (Per Participant)

Bioequivalence based on AUC0-t (NCT00841698)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over 120 hour period

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Paroxetine602.86
Paxil®618.14

[back to top]

Cmax - Maximum Observed Concentration (of Paroxetine in Plasma)

Bioequivalence based on Cmax (NCT00841698)
Timeframe: Blood samples collected over 120 hour period

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Paroxetine20.39
Paxil®20.67

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-SI) Scores at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8

The 7-point CGI-SI scale assesses the clinician's impression of the participant's current illness state. Scores on the CGI-SI range from 1 = not ill at all to 7 = among the most extremely ill. Mean change from baseline was calculated as the value at each time point minus the baseline value. (NCT00866294)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0); Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8

,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Week 1, n=171, 157, 83Week 2, n=164, 155, 80Week 3, n=161, 155, 78Week 4, n=158, 153, 79Week 6, n=151, 147, 76Week 8, n=144, 145, 74Week 8 LOCF, n=171, 158, 83
Paroxetine CR-0.2-0.4-0.7-0.8-1.1-1.3-1.2
Paroxetine IR-0.2-0.5-0.6-0.8-0.9-1.3-1.1
Placebo-0.1-0.4-0.6-0.7-0.9-1.0-0.9

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the HAM-D Total Score at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8

The HAM-D measures the severity of depressive symptoms in participants with MDD. It is a checklist of 17 items that are ranked on a scale of 0-4 or 0-2. The range for the total score (which is the sum of the scores of all 17 items) is 0-52; a higher score indicates greater severity of symptoms. Mean change from baseline was calculated as the value at each time point minus the Baseline value. (NCT00866294)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0); Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8

,,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Week 1, n=171, 157, 83Week 2, n=171, 158, 83Week 3, n=171, 158, 83Week 4, n=171, 158, 83Week 6, n=171, 158, 83Week 8, n=171, 158, 83
Paroxetine CR-2.9-5.5-7.5-9.3-10.9-12.4
Paroxetine IR-3.5-6.2-7.3-9.1-10.4-12.0
Placebo-3.1-5.2-6.7-8.0-8.8-9.8

[back to top]

Percentage of HAM-D Remitters at Weeks 4 and 8

The HAM-D measures the severity of depressive symptoms in participants with MDD. It is a checklist of 17 items that are ranked on a scale of 0-4 or 0-2. The range for the total score (which is the sum of the scores of all 17 items) is 0-52; a higher score indicates greater severity of symptoms. Remitters are defined as participants with a HAM-D total score of 7 or less. (NCT00866294)
Timeframe: Weeks 4 and 8

,,
Interventionpercentage of remitters (Number)
Week 4, n=158, 154, 78Week 8 (OC), n=144, 145, 74Week 8 LOCF, n=171, 158, 83
Paroxetine CR153835
Paroxetine IR183936
Placebo162623

[back to top]

Percentage of HAM-D Responders at Weeks 4 and 8

The HAM-D measures the severity of depressive symptoms in participants with MDD. It is a checklist of 17 items that are ranked on a scale of 0-4 or 0-2. The range for the total score (which is a sum of the scores of all 17 items) is 0-52; a higher score indicates greater severity of symptoms. Responders are defined as participants with a 50 percent or greater reduction from baseline in the HAM-D total score. (NCT00866294)
Timeframe: Weeks 4 and 8

,,
Interventionpercentage of responders (Number)
Week 4, n=158, 154, 78Week 8 (OC), n=144, 145, 74Week 8 LOCF, n=171, 158, 83
Paroxetine CR406663
Paroxetine IR405957
Placebo305246

[back to top]

Percentage of Responders Based on the Clinical Global Impression-Global Improvement (CGI-GI) Scores at Weeks 4 and 8

The 7-point CGI-GI assesses the participant's improvement or worsening from baseline. Scores on the CGI-GI range from 1 = very much improved to 7 = very much worse. Responders are defined as participants with a score of 1 or 2 = much improved. (NCT00866294)
Timeframe: Weeks 4 and 8

,,
Interventionpercentage of responders (Number)
Week 4, n=158, 153, 79Week 8 (OC), n=144, 145, 74Week 8 LOCF, n=171, 158, 83
Paroxetine CR517671
Paroxetine IR567875
Placebo406053

[back to top]

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D; 17 Items) Total Score at Week 8

The HAM-D measures the severity of depressive symptoms in participants with major depressive disorder (MDD). It is a checklist of 17 items that are ranked on a scale of 0-4 or 0-2. The range for the total score (which is the sum of the scores of all 17 items) is 0-52; a higher score indicates greater severity of symptoms. Mean change from baseline was calculated as the value at Week 8 minus the Baseline value. (NCT00866294)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 8

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-10.4
Paroxetine CR-12.8
Paroxetine IR-12.5

[back to top]

Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes Frequency From Baseline (BMI ≥32 kg/m2, Week 4 and Week 12), Median

"Subjects were weighed at each clinic visit and reported the number of hot flashes using an electronic diary.~For the BMI ≥32 kg/m2 subgroup, the mean weekly reduction in frequency of moderate to severe hot flashes from Baseline was calculated for Week 4 and Week 12." (NCT01101841)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
InterventionHot flashes per week (Median)
Week 4Week 12
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules-22.0-31.50
Placebo Capsules-17.0-23.00

[back to top]

Change in Severity of Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes From Baseline (BMI <32 kg/m2, At Week 4 and Week 12), Median

"Subjects were weighed at each clinic visit and reported the number of hot flashes using an electronic diary.~For the BMI <32 kg/m2 subgroup, the mean weekly reduction in the severity of moderate to severe hot flashes from Baseline was calculated at Week 4 and Week 12.~Subjects recorded the number of hot flashes per week using an electronic diary. Severity score for hot flashes for each subject was calculated as the sum of 2 times the number of moderate hot flashes, plus 3 times the number of severe hot flashes, divided by the total number of moderate and severe hot flashes.~Weekly Severity Score = (2•Fm +3•FS)/(Fm + FS) Daily Severity Score = {(2•F) m +3•FS)/(Fm + FS)}/7 Where, Fm= Frequency of Moderate Hot Flashes Fs = Frequency of Severe Hot Flashes The calculated severity score is reported below." (NCT01101841)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
InterventionHot Flash Severity scores per week (Median)
Week 4Week 12
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules-0.033-0.045
Placebo Capsules-0.004-0.00

[back to top]

Change in Severity of Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes From Baseline (BMI ≥32 kg/m2, Week 4 and Week 12), Median

"Subjects were weighed at each clinic visit and reported the number of hot flashes using an electronic diary.~For the BMI ≥32 kg/m2 subgroup, the mean weekly reduction in the severity of moderate to severe hot flashes from Baseline was calculated at Week 4 and Week 12.~Subjects recorded the number of hot flashes per week using an electronic diary. Severity score for hot flashes for each subject was calculated as the sum of 2 times the number of moderate hot flashes, plus 3 times the number of severe hot flashes, divided by the total number of moderate and severe hot flashes.~Weekly Severity Score = (2•Fm +3•FS)/(Fm + FS) Daily Severity Score = {(2•F) m +3•FS)/(Fm + FS)}/7 Where, Fm= Frequency of Moderate Hot Flashes Fs = Frequency of Severe Hot Flashes The calculated severity score is reported below." (NCT01101841)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
InterventionHot Flash Severity scores per week (Median)
Week 4Week 12
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules-0.039-0.052
Placebo Capsules-0.036-0.051

[back to top]

Effect of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules on Anxiety and Depression

"Depression & anxiety were measured by using the Hospital Anxiety & Depression Scale (HADS).~The HADS was developed to assess anxiety & depression. It is meant to differentiate symptoms of depression with those of anxiety.~Number of items: 14 (7 questions relating to anxiety; 7 questions relating to depression).~Responses are based on the relative frequency of symptoms over the past week, using a four point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very often indeed).~Responses are summed to provide separate scores for anxiety and depression symptomology with possible scores ranging from 0 to 21 for each scale.~The results presented below are the percentage of participants with abnormal HADS Scores for both Abnormal Anxiety & Abnormal Depression at Week 4 and Week 12." (NCT01101841)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4Week 12
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules5.654.13
Placebo Capsules2.445.24

[back to top] [back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Hot Flash Frequency at Week 4 and Week 12.

"Subjects recorded the number of hot flashes per week using an electronic diary. The results reported are not hot flashes per week.~The results reported are:~Mean Baseline frequency of moderate to severe VMS~Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe VMS from baseline to Week 4~Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe VMS from baseline to Week 12" (NCT01101841)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
InterventionHot flashes per day (Mean)
BaselineWeek 4Week 12
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules10.83-4.13-5.31
Placebo Capsules10.90-2.71-3.94

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Hot Flash Severity at Week 4 and Week 12.

"Subjects recorded the number of hot flashes per week using an electronic diary. Severity score for hot flashes for each subject was calculated as the sum of 2 times the number of moderate hot flashes, plus 3 times the number of severe hot flashes, divided by the total number of moderate and severe hot flashes.~Weekly Severity Score = (2•Fm +3•FS)/(Fm + FS) Daily Severity Score = {(2•F) m +3•FS)/(Fm + FS)}/7 Where, Fm= Frequency of Moderate Hot Flashes Fs = Frequency of Severe Hot Flashes" (NCT01101841)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
InterventionHot Flash Severity Score per day (Mean)
BaselineWeek 4Week 12
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules2.525-0.092-0.0126
Placebo Capsules2.532-0.059-0.066

[back to top]

Percent Responders Improvement in VMS From Baseline Using the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale.

"Proportion of NRS Responders: Subject's overall improvement in VMS from Baseline was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)~The Clinical Global Impression - Severity scale (CGI-S) is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the patient's illness at the time of assessment, relative to the clinician's past experience with patients who have the same diagnosis. Considering total clinical experience, a patient is assessed on severity of mental illness at the time of rating 1, normal, not at all ill; 2, borderline mentally ill; 3, mildly ill; 4, moderately ill; 5, markedly ill; 6, severely ill; or 7, extremely ill.~Responders: Subjects Achieving a Score of Very Much Improved Or Much Improved Or Minimally Improved.~Non Responders: Subjects with a Score of No Change Or Minimally Worse Or Much Worse Or Very Much Worse." (NCT01101841)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4Week 12
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules67.8869.88
Placebo Capsules53.5859.74

[back to top]

Percentage of Responders

Participants reported the number of hot flashes using an electronic diary. Participants who hd a ≥50% reduction in hot flash frequency were defined as responders. The percent of responders is presented below. (NCT01101841)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4Week 12
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules35.5649.30
Placebo Capsules25.3533.80

[back to top]

Percent Daytime and Nighttime Responders, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

"Subject's overall improvement in VMS from Baseline assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) The NRS is measured on a scale of 0 to 10 on how bothered the subject was by her VMS (0=not bothered at all and 10=very much bothered).~Responders: Subjects with NRS Score of 5 Or Less. Non-Responders: Subjects With NRS Score of Greater than Or Equal to 6." (NCT01101841)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
Interventionpercentage of total number of subjects (Number)
Week 4Week 12
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules35.4846.62
Placebo Capsules25.2737.72

[back to top]

Percent Persistence of Benefit, Statistically Significant Difference in Having 50% or More Reduction Compared to Baseline at Week 24.

"Persistence of treatment benefit to 24 weeks post treatment was assessed by using the following responder analysis. Responders were defined as those subjects who achieved ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in moderate to severe hot-flash frequency at Week 24; the percent change in hot flash frequency is calculated using the formula:~Percent reduction at week 24 = [(number of moderate to severe hot flash frequency at baseline - number of moderate to severe hot flash frequency at week 24) / number of moderate to severe hot flash frequency at baseline ]*100%." (NCT01101841)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercentage of total number of subjects (Number)
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules47.54
Placebo Capsules36.27

[back to top]

Assessment of Mood

"Mood was measured by using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) questionnaire. The Profile of Moods States (POMS) is a 65-item multi-dimensional measure that provides a method of assessing transient, fluctuating active mood states. Key areas that are measured include: tension-anxiety, anger-hostility, fatigue-inertia, depression-dejection, vigor-activity, confusion-bewilderment. Responses to questions are scored with the following numerical values: Not at all = 1, A little = 2, Moderate = 3, Quite a bit = 4, Extremely = 5. A total score for a domain was obtained by summing the responses of individual items in the domain. The total POMS score can range from 65 to 325. Each subject's total POMS score at baseline and at Week 4 and Week 12 were used to calculate the percent of participants with less disturbance in mood at Week 4 and Week 12 compared to baseline. The percent of participants with less disturbance in mood is reported below." (NCT01101841)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Week 4Week 12
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules37.4037.16
Placebo Capsules42.3944.23

[back to top]

BMI Change From Baseline (kg/m2), Median

"Subjects were weighed at each clinic visit and reported the number of hot flashes using an electronic diary.~Assessment of the effect of Brisdelle compared with placebo on body mass index." (NCT01101841)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
Interventionkg/m2 (Median)
Week 4Week 12
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules0.000.15
Placebo Capsules0.080.11

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX, Week 4 and Week 12) Total Score, Median

The Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX) is a 5-item rating scale that quantifies sex drive, arousal, vaginal lubrication/penile erection, ability to reach orgasm, and satisfaction from orgasm. Possible total scores range from 5 to 30, with the higher scores indicating more sexual dysfunction.The sum of the scores for all 5 items was calculated at Week 4 and Week 12. (NCT01101841)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Median)
Week 4Week 12
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules0.000.00
Placebo Capsules0.000.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Week 4 and Week 12, Total Score, Median

"The Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) was used for this measurement. The scale has 21 questions and measures symptoms in 4 areas; these are psychological (anxiety and depression), physical, vasomotor, and libido.~The severity of the symptom was scored as: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. Anxiety was determined by using the sum of scores 1 to 6, and depression was determined by using the sum of scores 7 to 11. Physical aspects were determined by using the sum of scores 12 to 18; vasomotor aspects were determined by using the sum of scores 19 to 20; and libido was determined by using the score for question 21.~The total GCS score ranges from 0 to 63 which is the sum of all the scores for the 21-symptom assessment questions in this scale. Each subject's total GCS score at baseline and at Week 4 and Week 12 were used to calculate change from baseline in these symptoms. The change from baseline is reported below." (NCT01101841)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Week 4Week 12
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules-3.00-4.00
Placebo Capsules-3.00-3.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Number of Awakenings Due to Hot Flashes, Median

"Participants completed a electronic diary to report nightime awakenings. Subjects took study drug once daily at bedtime and they were instructed to complete daily hot flash and sleep diaries to record the number of hot flashes daily, the severity of each episode of hot flash and total number of awakenings due to hot flashes.~The diary data was used to evaluate and compare the treatment groups, on the change from baseline to Week 4 and Week 12, in the total number of awakenings due to hot flashes. The total number of awakenings due to hot flashes in the run-in period was used as baseline." (NCT01101841)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
InterventionAwakenings (Median)
Week 4Week 12
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules-8.50-13.15
Placebo Capsules-6.62-8.67

[back to top]

Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes Frequency From Baseline (BMI <32 kg/m2, Week 4 and Week 12), Median

"Subjects were weighed at each clinic visit and reported the number of hot flashes using an electronic diary.~For the BMI <32 kg/m2 subgroup, the mean weekly reduction in frequency of moderate to severe hot flashes from Baseline was calculated for Week 4 and Week 12." (NCT01101841)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
InterventionHot flashes per week (Median)
Week 4Week 12
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules-28.50-41.00
Placebo Capsules-18.0-27.00

[back to top]

Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Scale Total Score at Week 0,5,10

Measures life enjoyment and satisfaction across 16 domains 16 = very poor quality of life to 80 =very good quality of life (NCT01130103)
Timeframe: weeks 0,5,10

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
week 0week 5week 10
Paroxetine47.155.567.9
Placebo Pill45.459.454.8

[back to top]

Treatment Response at Weeks 5 and 10

"responder status: CGI-change score of 1 or 2~1=very much improved, 2= much improved" (NCT01130103)
Timeframe: weeks 5,10

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
week 5week 10
Paroxetine612
Placebo Pill67

[back to top]

Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS)

PTSD severity, minimum = 0 = no symptoms of PTSD maximum = 136 = extremely severe symptoms of PTSD (NCT01130103)
Timeframe: Weeks 0,5,10

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
week 0week 5week 10
Paroxetine72.640.721.5
Placebo Pill65.449.035.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Met Remission Criterion

remission defined as: CAPS less than or equal to 20 and Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-change score=1 (NCT01130103)
Timeframe: Weeks 5,10

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
week 5week 10
Paroxetine28
Placebo Pill03

[back to top]

Hamilton Depression Scale 0 = no Depression Symptoms 40 = Extreme Depression Symptoms

total score at weeks 0, 5, 10 (NCT01130103)
Timeframe: weeks 0,5,10

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
week 0week 5week 10
Paroxetine16.911.77.7
Placebo Pill16.611.811.4

[back to top]

Change in Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ), Last Observation Carried Forward

The Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire is a patient-rated, 7-item scale used to measure cognitive and executive dysfunction in mood and anxiety disorders. The CPFQ is sensitive to change with treatment and displays convergent validity by significant correlations with other measures of sleepiness, fatigue, apathy, and neuropsychological functioning. Patients are rated on a scale from 1 to 6 for seven common complaints of depressed patients reporting fatigue or cognitive/executive problems-with 1 indicating greater than normal functioning, 2 indicating normal functioning, and 3 to 6 indicating degrees of impaired functioning. The CPFQ ranges from the best possible score of 7 (greater than normal functioning) to the worst possible score of 42 (totally absent). (NCT01254305)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 8

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-5.9
Levomilnacipran ER-7.0
SSRI-6.4

[back to top]

Change in Patient Global Impressions of Severity (PGI-S) for Fatigue Score

The PGI-S is a clinician-rated scale that rates was used to rate the severity of the patient's current state of overall fatigue. Patients were rated on a scale from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating no symptoms of fatigue and 7 indicating extreme fatigue. (NCT01254305)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 8

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-1.4
Levomilnacipran ER-1.7
SSRI-1.7

[back to top]

Change in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) for Fatigue Score

The CGI-S is a clinician-rated scale that rates the severity of the patient's current state of fatigue based on the Investigator's clinical opinion with regard to the patient population with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Patient were rated on a scale from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating a normal state and 7 indicating that the patient was among the most extremely fatigued (NCT01254305)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 8

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-1.5
Levomilnacipran ER-1.8
SSRI-1.9

[back to top]

Cmin_ss

Cmin_ss is defined as the minimum concentration of a drug observed after its administration, in steady-state. Cmin_ss is one of the parameters of particular use in estimating the bioavailability of drugs, for studies employing multiple doses. (NCT01339247)
Timeframe: Days 14 to 17 (period 1) and Days 23 to 24 (Period 2)

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Test Product19.4468
Reference Product18.9010

[back to top]

Cmax_ss

"Cmax_ss is defined as the maximum or peak concentration of a drug observed after its administration, in steady-state. Cmax_ss is one of the parameters of particular use in estimating the bioavailability of drugs, by measuring the total amount of drug absorbed." (NCT01339247)
Timeframe: Days 14 to 17 (period 1) and Days 23 to 24 (Period 2)

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
Test Product36.7235
Reference Product36.6630

[back to top]

AUC_ss

The area under the plot of plasma concentration of drug against time after drug administration is defined as the area under the curve (AUC). The AUC_ss is the area under the curve during the steady-state period. The AUC_ss is of particular use in estimating the bioavailability of drugs, by measuring the extent of absorption. ng, nanograms; h, hour; ml, milliliter; ng.h/ml, nanograms per hour per milliliter. (NCT01339247)
Timeframe: Days 14 to 17 (period 1) and Days 23 to 24 (Period 2)

Interventionng.h/ml (Mean)
Test Product672.9221
Reference Product645.5407

[back to top]

Change in CSF 3-nitrosylated Protein Levels Between Baseline and Week 24 - Per Protocol

CSF lipid and protein markers of oxidative stress: Change in 3-nitrosylated protein levels between baseline and week 24 for participants with 90% or greater adherence to study drug and for whom CSF data are available (per protocol analysis). (NCT01354314)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

Interventionpi*mm^2 (Median)
Paroxetine and Fluconazole0.712
Paroxetine0.257
Fluconazole-3.959
Placebo-13.160

[back to top]

Neurocognitive Performance: Timed Gait - Per Protocol

Baseline to Week 24 change in neurocognitive performance as measured by Timed Gait, three-trial average time (Z scores). (NCT01354314)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

InterventionZ score (Mean)
Paroxetine and Fluconazole-0.641
Fluconazole-0.170
Paroxetine0.574
Placebo-0.584

[back to top]

Neurocognitive Performance: CalCAP, Sequential - Per Protocol

Baseline to Week 24 change in neurocognitive performance as measured by the CalCAP Sequential test, mean reaction time (Z scores). (NCT01354314)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

InterventionZ score (Mean)
Paroxetine and Fluconazole0.355
Fluconazole-0.11
Paroxetine0.631
Placebo-0.394

[back to top]

Change in CSF Ceramide Between Baseline and Week 24 (C18:0 Levels) - Intent to Treat

CSF lipid and protein markers of oxidative stress: Change in CSF ceramide (C18:0 levels) between baseline and week 24 for all participants for whom baseline and follow-up CSF data are available (intent to treat analysis). (NCT01354314)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Paroxetine and Fluconazole-30.78
Paroxetine4.16
Fluconazole-12.17
Placebo-30.56

[back to top]

Neurocognitive Performance: Trail Making B - Per Protocol

Baseline to Week 24 change in neurocognitive performance as measured by the Trail-making test, part B speed of completion (Z scores). (NCT01354314)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

InterventionZ score (Mean)
Paroxetine and Fluconazole0.63
Fluconazole-0.83
Paroxetine0.49
Placebo0.16

[back to top]

Neurocognitive Performance: Trail Making B - Intent to Treat

Baseline to Week 24 change in neurocognitive performance as measured by the Trail-making test, part B speed of completion (Z scores). (NCT01354314)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

InterventionZ score (Mean)
Paroxetine and Fluconazole0.47
Fluconazole-0.71
Paroxetine0.51
Placebo0.020

[back to top]

Neurocognitive Performance: Trail Making A - Per Protocol

Baseline to Week 24 change in neurocognitive performance as measured by the Trail-making test, part A speed of completion (Z scores). (NCT01354314)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

InterventionZ score (Mean)
Paroxetine and Fluconazole-0.28
Fluconazole0.17
Paroxetine0.24
Placebo0.52

[back to top]

Neurocognitive Performance: Trail Making A - Intent to Treat

Baseline to Week 24 change in neurocognitive performance as measured by the Trail-making test, part A speed of completion (Z scores). (NCT01354314)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

InterventionZ score (Mean)
Paroxetine and Fluconazole0.045
Fluconazole0.067
Paroxetine0.000
Placebo0.09

[back to top]

Neurocognitive Performance: Timed Gait - Intent to Treat

Baseline to Week 24 change in neurocognitive performance as measured by Timed Gait, three-trial average time (Z scores). (NCT01354314)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

InterventionZ score (Mean)
Paroxetine and Fluconazole-0.575
Fluconazole-0.425
Paroxetine0.283
Placebo-0.148

[back to top]

Neurocognitive Performance: Symbol-Digit Test - Per Protocol

Baseline to Week 24 change in neurocognitive performance as measured by Symbol-Digit Test score, number correct in 120 seconds (Z scores). (NCT01354314)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

InterventionZ score (Mean)
Paroxetine and Fluconazole0.354
Fluconazole-0.167
Paroxetine0.275
Placebo-0.180

[back to top]

Neurocognitive Performance: Symbol-Digit Test - Intent to Treat

Baseline to Week 24 change in neurocognitive performance as measured by Symbol-Digit Test score, number correct in 120 seconds (Z scores). (NCT01354314)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

InterventionZ score (Mean)
Paroxetine and Fluconazole0.494
Fluconazole0.175
Paroxetine0.050
Placebo-0.175

[back to top]

Neurocognitive Performance: NPZ-8 - Per Protocol

Baseline to Week 24 change in neurocognitive performance as measured by NPZ-8 scores calculated for all participants who completed the trial with measurable Baseline and Week 24 data for at least 6 of the 8 data points. The data points that comprise the NPZ-8 include timed gait, symbol-digit, grooved pegboard dominant and non-dominant, CalCAP Choice reaction time and Sequential reaction time, Trail-making Test A and B. The baseline to week 24 changes for each test were averaged to get each change in NPZ-8 score. (NCT01354314)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

InterventionZ score (Mean)
Paroxetine and Fluconazole-0.005
Fluconazole-0.298
Paroxetine0.575
Placebo-0.199

[back to top]

Neurocognitive Performance: NPZ-8 - Intent to Treat

Baseline to Week 24 change in neurocognitive performance as measured by NPZ-8 scores calculated for all participants who completed the trial with measurable Baseline and Week 24 data for at least 6 of the 8 data points. The data points that comprise the NPZ-8 include timed gait, symbol-digit, grooved pegboard dominant and non-dominant, CalCAP Choice reaction time and Sequential reaction time, Trail-making Test A and B. The baseline to week 24 changes for each test were averaged to get each change in NPZ-8 score. (NCT01354314)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

InterventionZ score (Mean)
Paroxetine and Fluconazole0.121
Fluconazole-0.165
Paroxetine0.313
Placebo-0.191

[back to top]

Neurocognitive Performance: Grooved Pegboard, Non-Dominant - Per Protocol

Baseline to Week 24 change in neurocognitive performance as measured by the Grooved Pegboard test, non-dominant hand speed of completion (Z scores). (NCT01354314)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

InterventionZ score (Mean)
Paroxetine and Fluconazole-0.17
Fluconazole0.13
Paroxetine0.41
Placebo-0.42

[back to top]

Neurocognitive Performance: Grooved Pegboard, Non-Dominant - Intent to Treat

Baseline to Week 24 change in neurocognitive performance as measured by the Grooved Pegboard test, non-dominant hand speed of completion (Z scores). (NCT01354314)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

InterventionZ score (Mean)
Paroxetine and Fluconazole-0.16
Fluconazole-0.11
Paroxetine0.20
Placebo0.05

[back to top]

Neurocognitive Performance: Grooved Pegboard, Dominant - Per Protocol

Baseline to Week 24 change in neurocognitive performance as measured by the Grooved Pegboard test, dominant hand speed of completion (Z scores). (NCT01354314)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

InterventionZ score (Mean)
Paroxetine and Fluconazole0.15
Fluconazole-0.67
Paroxetine0.59
Placebo-0.14

[back to top]

Neurocognitive Performance: Grooved Pegboard, Dominant - Intent to Treat

Baseline to Week 24 change in neurocognitive performance as measured by the Grooved Pegboard test, dominant hand speed of completion (Z scores). (NCT01354314)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

InterventionZ score (Mean)
Paroxetine and Fluconazole0.23
Fluconazole0.05
Paroxetine0.57
Placebo-0.01

[back to top]

Neurocognitive Performance: CalCAP, Sequential - Intent to Treat

Baseline to Week 24 change in neurocognitive performance as measured by the CalCAP Sequential test, mean reaction time (Z scores). (NCT01354314)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

InterventionZ score (Mean)
Paroxetine and Fluconazole0.272
Fluconazole-0.025
Paroxetine0.317
Placebo-0.530

[back to top]

Neurocognitive Performance: CalCAP, Choice - Per Protocol

Baseline to Week 24 change in neurocognitive performance as measured by the CalCAP Choice test, mean reaction time (Z scores). (NCT01354314)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

InterventionZ score (Mean)
Paroxetine and Fluconazole-0.440
Fluconazole-1.17
Paroxetine1.724
Placebo-0.554

[back to top]

Neurocognitive Performance: CalCAP, Choice - Intent to Treat

Baseline to Week 24 change in neurocognitive performance as measured by the CalCAP Choice test, mean reaction time (Z scores). (NCT01354314)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

InterventionZ score (Mean)
Paroxetine and Fluconazole0.152
Fluconazole-0.570
Paroxetine0.871
Placebo-1.325

[back to top]

Change in CSF sCD14 Between Baseline and Week 24 - Per Protocol

CSF immune and neuronal injury markers: Change in CSF sCD14 between baseline and week 24 for participants with 90% or greater study drug adherence and for whom baseline and follow-up CSF data are available (per protocol analysis). (NCT01354314)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Paroxetine and Fluconazole-4.3
Paroxetine33.2
Fluconazole-5.1
Placebo-18.9

[back to top]

Change in CSF sCD14 Between Baseline and Week 24 - Intent to Treat

CSF immune and neuronal injury markers: Change in CSF sCD14 between baseline and week 24 for all participants for whom baseline and follow-up CSF data are available (intent to treat analysis). (NCT01354314)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Paroxetine and Fluconazole-17.7
Paroxetine15.2
Fluconazole-16.5
Placebo12.0

[back to top]

Change in CSF Neurofilament Protein Light Chain (NFL) Between Baseline and Week 24 - Per Protocol

CSF immune and neuronal injury markers: Change in CSF neurofilament protein light chain (NFL) between baseline and week 24 for participants with 90% or greater study drug adherence and for whom baseline and follow-up CSF data are available (per protocol analysis). (NCT01354314)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Paroxetine and Fluconazole0.0560
Paroxetine0.1580
Fluconazole0.0985
Placebo0.1375

[back to top]

Change in CSF Neurofilament Protein Light Chain (NFL) Between Baseline and Week 24 - Intent to Treat

CSF immune and neuronal injury markers: Change in CSF neurofilament protein light chain (NFL) between baseline and week 24 for all participants for whom baseline and follow-up CSF data are available (intent to treat analysis). (NCT01354314)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Paroxetine and Fluconazole0.0890
Paroxetine0.1710
Fluconazole0.2030
Placebo0.1000

[back to top]

Change in CSF Neurofilament Protein Heavy Chain (pNFL) Between Baseline and Week 24 - Intent to Treat

CSF immune and neuronal injury markers: Change in CSF neurofilament protein heavy chain (pNFL) between baseline and week 24 for all participants for whom baseline and follow-up CSF data are available (intent to treat analysis). (NCT01354314)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Paroxetine and Fluconazole-0.0080
Paroxetine0.0705
Fluconazole0.0400
Placebo0.0520

[back to top]

Change in CSF Neurofilament Protein Heavy Chain (pNFH) Between Baseline and Week 24 - Per Protocol

CSF immune and neuronal injury markers: Change in CSF neurofilament protein heavy chain (pNFH) between baseline and week 24 for participants with 90% or greater study drug adherence and for whom baseline and follow-up CSF data are available (per protocol analysis). (NCT01354314)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Paroxetine and Fluconazole-0.0035
Paroxetine0.0645
Fluconazole0.0270
Placebo0.0395

[back to top]

Change in CSF Ceramide Between Baseline and Week 24 (C18:0 Levels) - Per Protocol

CSF lipid and protein markers of oxidative stress: Change in CSF ceramide (C18:0 levels) between baseline and week 24 for participants with 90% or greater study drug adherence and for whom baseline and follow-up CSF data are available (per protocol analysis). (NCT01354314)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Paroxetine and Fluconazole-51.35
Paroxetine34.11
Fluconazole-65.00
Placebo-52.37

[back to top]

Change in CSF CD163 Between Baseline and Week 24 - Per Protocol

CSF immune and neuronal injury markers: Change in CSF CD163 between baseline and week 24 for participants with 90% or greater study drug adherence and for whom baseline and follow-up CSF data are available (per protocol analysis). (NCT01354314)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Paroxetine and Fluconazole-3.2
Paroxetine-0.7
Fluconazole-7.5
Placebo-1.8

[back to top]

Change in CSF CD163 Between Baseline and Week 24 - Intent to Treat

CSF immune and neuronal injury markers: Change in CSF CD163 between baseline and week 24 for all participants for whom baseline and follow-up CSF data are available (intent to treat analysis). (NCT01354314)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Paroxetine and Fluconazole1.6
Paroxetine-0.7
Fluconazole-2.7
Placebo-3.8

[back to top]

Change in CSF 3-nitrosylated Protein Levels Between Baseline and Week 24 - Intent to Treat

CSF lipid and protein markers of oxidative stress: Change in 3-nitrosylated protein levels between baseline and week 24 for all participants for whom CSF data are available (intent to treat analysis). (NCT01354314)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

Interventionpi*mm^2 (Median)
Paroxetine and Fluconazole6.392
Paroxetine12.235
Fluconazole33.767
Placebo-8.747

[back to top]

Change in CES-D Score - Per Protocol

Functional assessment: Change in Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) score between baseline and week 24 for all participants for whom baseline and follow-up CES-D data are available (per protocol). (NCT01354314)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Paroxetine and Fluconazole1.667
Fluconazole6.000
Paroxetine-0.875
Placebo8.800

[back to top]

Change in CES-D Score - Intent to Treat

Functional assessment: Change in Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) score between baseline and week 24 for all participants for whom baseline and follow-up CES-D data are available (intent to treat analysis). (NCT01354314)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Paroxetine and Fluconazole-1.182
Fluconazole1.222
Paroxetine-1.182
Placebo2.600

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) of Illness Score

"The severity of illness for each participant was rated using the CGI-S . On the basis of the investigator answer to the question: Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill was the participant at that time? Response choices included: 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline mentally ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; and 7 = among the most extremely ill participants." (NCT01360866)
Timeframe: From screening to week 52/early termination

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Prior Placebo-0.77
Prior Brexpiprazole-0.63
Prior ADT-0.48
Prior Seroquel-0.93

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self Report (IDS-SR) Total Score

"The IDS-SR was a 30-item self-report measure used to assess core diagnostic depressive symptoms as well as atypical and melancholic symptom features of MDD. The IDS-SR consists of 30 items, all rated on a 0 to 3 scale with 0 being the best rating and 3 being the worst rating. The IDS-SR Total Score is the sum of ratings of 28 item scores. The possible IDS-SR Total Score ranges from 0 (best) to 84 (worst).~Under item 9, two sub-items 9A and 9B exist, with possible scores of 1, 2 or 3 for item 9A, and 0 or 1 for item 9B. The scores for these two sub-items are not included in the calculation of the total score. Item 11 or item 12 should be completed but not both, and similarly, item 13 or item 14 should be completed but not both. If the number of items recorded is at least 23 and at most 27, the IDS-SR Total Score will be the mean of the recorded items multiplied by 28 and then rounded to the first decimal place." (NCT01360866)
Timeframe: From screening to week 52/early termination

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Prior Placebo-5.25
Prior Brexpiprazole-4.76
Prior ADT-3.94
Prior Seroquel-7.44

[back to top]

Adverse Events (AEs) - All Participants

To assess the frequency and severity of AEs as the variables of safety and tolerability of brexpiprazole. (NCT01360866)
Timeframe: From screening to week 52/early termination

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants with adverse eventsParticipants with treatment emergent AE (TEAE)Participants with serious TEAEParticipants with severe TEAEPartcipants discontinued due to AEs
Prior ADT116511633399134
Prior Brexpiprazole511510236458
Prior Placebo400399144855
Prior Seroquel5151146

[back to top]

Summary of Mean Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Mean Score

"The SDS was a self-rated instrument used to measure the effect of the participant's symptoms on regular life responsibilities. The SDS was a visual analogue scale that used spatio-visual, numeric, and verbal descriptive anchors simultaneously to assess disability across the 3 domains with scores from 0 = not at all, to 10 = extremely.~Scores of 5 and above were associated with significant functional impairment." (NCT01360866)
Timeframe: From screening to week 52/early termination

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Prior Placebo-0.80
Prior Brexpiprazole-0.70
Prior ADT-0.40
Prior Seroquel-1.00

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score

The efficacy of trial treatment was rated for each participant using the CGI-I. The investigator rated the participant's total improvement whether or not it was due entirely to drug treatment. All responses were compared to the participant's condition at screening. Response choices included: 0 = not assessed, 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse and 7 = very much worse. (NCT01360866)
Timeframe: From screening to week 52/early termination

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Prior Placebo2.60
Prior Brexpiprazole2.63
Prior ADT2.63
Prior Seroquel2.40

[back to top]

Change in Severity of Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes From Baseline (BMI ≥32 kg/m2, Week 4 and Week 12), Median

"Subjects were weighed at each clinic visit and reported the number of hot flashes using an electronic diary.~For the BMI ≥32 kg/m2 subgroup, the mean weekly reduction in the severity of moderate to severe hot flashes from Baseline was calculated at Week 4 and Week 12.~Subjects recorded the number of hot flashes per week using an electronic diary. Severity score for hot flashes for each subject was calculated as the sum of 2 times the number of moderate hot flashes, plus 3 times the number of severe hot flashes, divided by the total number of moderate and severe hot flashes.~Weekly Severity Score = (2•Fm +3•FS)/(Fm + FS) Daily Severity Score = {(2•F) m +3•FS)/(Fm + FS)}/7 Where, Fm= Frequency of Moderate Hot Flashes Fs = Frequency of Severe Hot Flashes The calculated severity score is reported below." (NCT01361308)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
InterventionHot Flash Severity scores per week (Median)
Week 4Week 12
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) 7.5 mg Capsules-0.023-0.079
Placebo Capsules-0.014-0.030

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Total Number of Awakenings Due to Hot Flashes, Median

"Participants completed a electronic diary to report nightime awakenings. Subjects took study drug once daily at bedtime and they were instructed to complete daily hot flash and sleep diaries to record the number of hot flashes daily, the severity of each episode of hot flash and total number of awakenings due to hot flashes.~The diary data was used to evaluate and compare the treatment groups, on the change from baseline to Week 4 and Week 12, in the total number of awakenings due to hot flashes. The total number of awakenings due to hot flashes in the run-in period was used as baseline." (NCT01361308)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
InterventionNightime awakenings (Median)
Week 4Week 12
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) 7.5 mg Capsules-8.33-12.00
Placebo Capsules-7.12-11.05

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Week 4 and Week 12, Total Score, Median

"The Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) was used for this measurement. The scale has 21 questions and measures symptoms in 4 areas; these are psychological (anxiety and depression), physical, vasomotor, and libido.~The severity of the symptom was scored as: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe. Anxiety was determined by using the sum of scores 1 to 6, and depression was determined by using the sum of scores 7 to 11. Physical aspects were determined by using the sum of scores 12 to 18; vasomotor aspects were determined by using the sum of scores 19 to 20; and libido was determined by using the score for question 21.~The total GCS score ranges from 0 to 63 which is the sum of all the scores for the 21-symptom assessment questions in this scale. Each subject's total GCS score at baseline and at Week 4 and Week 12 were used to calculate change from baseline in these symptoms. The change from baseline is reported below." (NCT01361308)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Week 4Week 12
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) 7.5 mg Capsules-3.00-4.00
Placebo Capsules-2.00-3.00

[back to top]

BMI Change From Baseline (kg/m2), Median

"Subjects were weighed at each clinic visit and reported the number of hot flashes using an electronic diary.~Assessment of the effect of Brisdelle compared with placebo on body mass index." (NCT01361308)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
InterventionChange from baseline BMI kg/m2 (Median)
Week 4Week 12
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) 7.5 mg Capsules0.000.00
Placebo Capsules0.040.17

[back to top]

Percentage of Responders

Participants reported the number of hot flashes using an electronic diary. Participants who hd a ≥50% reduction in hot flash frequency were defined as responders. The percent of responders is presented below. (NCT01361308)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4Week 12
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) 7.5 mg Capsules40.2049.83
Placebo Capsules29.1844.92

[back to top]

Percentage of Patient Global Improvement (PGI) Scale Responders (%)

"Percentage of PGI Responders: Subject's overall improvement in VMS from baseline assessed using the Patient Global Improvement (PGI) scale. Responders: Subjects Achieving a Score of Very Much Better Or Much Better Or A Little Better.~Non Responders: Subjects with a Score of No Change Or A Little Worse Or Much Worse Or Very Much Worse.~Patient Global Improvement (PGI) scale is described below:~Compared to before starting study medication, how would you describe your hot flushes now? 0 = Not assessed~= Very much better~= Much better~= A little better~= No change~= A little worse~= Much worse~= Very much worse" (NCT01361308)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4Week 12
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) 7.5 mg Capsules68.2172.82
Placebo Capsules61.7564.60

[back to top]

Percent Responders Improvement in VMS From Baseline Using the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale.

"Proportion of NRS Responders: Subject's overall improvement in VMS from Baseline was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)~The Clinical Global Impression - Severity scale (CGI-S) is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the patient's illness at the time of assessment, relative to the clinician's past experience with patients who have the same diagnosis. Considering total clinical experience, a patient is assessed on severity of mental illness at the time of rating 1, normal, not at all ill; 2, borderline mentally ill; 3, mildly ill; 4, moderately ill; 5, markedly ill; 6, severely ill; or 7, extremely ill.~Responders: Subjects Achieving a Score of Very Much Improved Or Much Improved Or Minimally Improved.~Non Responders: Subjects with a Score of No Change Or Minimally Worse Or Much Worse Or Very Much Worse." (NCT01361308)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4Week 12
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) 7.5 mg Capsules68.9371.88
Placebo Capsules57.8963.92

[back to top]

Assessment of Mood

"Mood was measured by using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) questionnaire. The Profile of Moods States (POMS) is a 65-item multi-dimensional measure that provides a method of assessing transient, fluctuating active mood states. Key areas that are measured include: tension-anxiety, anger-hostility, fatigue-inertia, depression-dejection, vigor-activity, confusion-bewilderment. Responses to questions are scored with the following numerical values: Not at all = 1, A little = 2, Moderate = 3, Quite a bit = 4, Extremely = 5. A total score for a domain was obtained by summing the responses of individual items in the domain. The total POMS score can range from 65 to 325. Each subject's total POMS score at baseline and at Week 4 and Week 12 were used to calculate the percent of participants with less disturbance in mood at Week 4 and Week 12 compared to baseline. The percent of participants with less disturbance in mood is reported below." (NCT01361308)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Week 4Week 12
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) 7.5 mg Capsules39.2943.90
Placebo Capsules35.3634.25

[back to top]

Percent Daytime and Nighttime Responders, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

"Subject's overall improvement in VMS from Baseline assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) The NRS is measured on a scale of 0 to 10 on how bothered the subject was by her VMS (0=not bothered at all and 10=very much bothered).~The measure being reported below is percentage of responders who had an improvement in NRSscore at Week 4 and Week 12 compared to baseline. A responder is defined as a subject who had an improvement in the NRS score. An improvement is defined as a score ≤5 on each question." (NCT01361308)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4Week 12
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) 7.5 mg Capsules39.0046.51
Placebo Capsules30.4645.72

[back to top]

Mean Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe VMS From Baseline at Week 4 and Week 12.

"Subjects recorded the number of hot flashes per week using an electronic diary. The results reported are not hot flashes per week.~The results reported are:~Mean Baseline frequency of moderate to severe VMS~Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe VMS from baseline to Week 4~Mean change in frequency of moderate to severe VMS from baseline to Week 12." (NCT01361308)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
InterventionHot flash per day (Mean)
BaselineWeek 4Week 12
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) 7.5 mg Capsules11.79-4.71-6.22
Placebo Capsules11.65-3.36-5.33

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Hot Flash Severity at Week 4 and Week 12

"Subjects recorded the number of hot flashes per week using an electronic diary. Severity score for hot flashes for each subject was calculated as the sum of 2 times the number of moderate hot flashes, plus 3 times the number of severe hot flashes, divided by the total number of moderate and severe hot flashes.~Weekly Severity Score = (2•Fm +3•FS)/(Fm + FS) Daily Severity Score = {(2•F) m +3•FS)/(Fm + FS)}/7 Where, Fm= Frequency of Moderate Hot Flashes Fs = Frequency of Severe Hot Flashes The calculated severity score is reported below." (NCT01361308)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
InterventionHot Flash Severity score per day (Mean)
BaselineWeek 4Week 12
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) 7.5 mg Capsules2.528-0.091-0.104
Placebo Capsules2.526-0.046-0.084

[back to top] [back to top]

Effect of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules on Anxiety and Depression

"Depression & anxiety were measured by using the Hospital Anxiety & Depression Scale (HADS).~The HADS was developed to assess anxiety & depression. It is meant to differentiate symptoms of depression with those of anxiety.~Number of items: 14 (7 questions relating to anxiety; 7 questions relating to depression).~Responses are based on the relative frequency of symptoms over the past week, using a four point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very often indeed).~Responses are summed to provide separate scores for anxiety and depression symptomology with possible scores ranging from 0 to 21 for each scale.~The results presented below are the percentage of participants with abnormal HADS Scores for both Abnormal Anxiety & Abnormal Depression at Week 4 and Week 12." (NCT01361308)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4Week 12
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) 7.5 mg Capsules3.562.02
Placebo Capsules3.562.75

[back to top]

Clinical Meaningfulness Anchored to Patient Global Improvement (PGI-I) (%)

"A patient improvement scale questionnaire was used during participant visits.~The clinical meaningfulness of the observed treatment effect was demonstrated by performing the following analysis:~Subjects were categorized in to 2 groups (satisfied and unsatisfied). Based on a 7 point patient global impression (PGI) questionnaire which assesses the subject improvement in VMS. Subjects were considered satisfied with their treatment if their response to the question Compared to before starting the study medication, how would you describe your hot flushes now? is 'Very much better' (1) or 'Much better' (2) or 'A little better' (3) and will be considered unsatisfied if their response to the same question is 'No change' (4) or 'A little worse' (5) or 'Much worse' (6) or 'Very much worse' (7). Receiver Operator Curve (ROC) analysis was performed on the combined data.~Subjects who were satisfied with their treatment were considered to have a treatment effect with clinical meaningfulness" (NCT01361308)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
InterventionPercentage of satisfied participants (Number)
Week 4Week 12
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) 7.5 mg Capsules5051
Placebo Capsules3743

[back to top]

Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes Frequency From Baseline (BMI <32 kg/m2, Week 4 and Week 12), Median

"Subjects were weighed at each clinic visit and reported the number of hot flashes using an electronic diary.~For the BMI <32 kg/m2 subgroup, the mean weekly reduction in frequency of moderate to severe hot flashes from Baseline was calculated for Week 4 and Week 12." (NCT01361308)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
InterventionHot flashes per week (Median)
Week 4Week 12
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) 7.5 mg Capsules-31.00-46.00
Placebo Capsules-23.50-35.00

[back to top]

Change in Severity of Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes From Baseline (BMI <32 kg/m2, At Week 4 and Week 12), Median

"Subjects were weighed at each clinic visit and reported the number of hot flashes using an electronic diary.~For the BMI <32 kg/m2 subgroup, the mean weekly reduction in the severity of moderate to severe hot flashes from Baseline was calculated at Week 4 and Week 12.~Subjects recorded the number of hot flashes per week using an electronic diary. Severity score for hot flashes for each subject was calculated as the sum of 2 times the number of moderate hot flashes, plus 3 times the number of severe hot flashes, divided by the total number of moderate and severe hot flashes.~Weekly Severity Score = (2•Fm +3•FS)/(Fm + FS) Daily Severity Score = {(2•F) m +3•FS)/(Fm + FS)}/7 Where, Fm= Frequency of Moderate Hot Flashes Fs = Frequency of Severe Hot Flashes The calculated severity score is reported below." (NCT01361308)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
InterventionHot Flash Severity scores per week (Median)
Week 4Week 12
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) 7.5 mg Capsules-0.055-0.043
Placebo Capsules0.00-0.010

[back to top]

Change in Frequency of Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes Frequency From Baseline (BMI ≥32 kg/m2, Week 4 and Week 12), Median

"Subjects were weighed at each clinic visit and reported the number of hot flashes using an electronic diary.~For the BMI ≥32 kg/m2 subgroup, the mean weekly reduction in frequency of moderate to severe hot flashes from Baseline was calculated for Week 4 and Week 12." (NCT01361308)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
InterventionHot flashes per week (Median)
Week 4Week 12
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) 7.5 mg Capsules-28.00-35.00
Placebo Capsules-19.00-37.50

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX, Week 4 and Week 12) Total Score

"The Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX) is a 5-item rating scale that quantifies sex drive, arousal, vaginal lubrication/penile erection, ability to reach orgasm, and satisfaction from orgasm. Possible total scores range from 5 to 30, with the higher scores indicating more sexual dysfunction.~The sum of the scores for all 5 items was calculated at Week 4 and Week 12. The results presented below are change from baseline at Week 4 and Week 12." (NCT01361308)
Timeframe: Week 4 and Week 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 4Week 12
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) 7.5 mg Capsules-0.34-0.36
Placebo Capsules-0.43-0.61

[back to top]

Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)

The HAMD measures the severity of depressive symptoms in participants with major depressive disorder (MDD). It is a checklist of 17 items that are ranked on a scale of 0-4 or 0-2. The range for the total score (which is the sum of the scores of all 17 items) is 0-52; a higher score indicates greater severity of symptoms. (NCT01608295)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
HDRS BaselineHDRS Final Visit
Paroxetine; Paxil16.67.5
Vilazodone; Viibryd17.27.6

[back to top]

Changes in Proinflammatory Gene Expression From Baseline to Final Visit (up to 12 Weeks)

Gene expression data were quantile-normalized and log2-transformed in RNA expression units. The measure included the promoter transcription factor binding motif prevalence ratio of the unit (log2 Vilazodone/Paroxetine) and ranging from a minimum of -3 to a maximum of 3 with higher scores indicating better outcomes. (NCT01608295)
Timeframe: Baseline and Final Visit

InterventionRNA expression units (Mean)
AP-1, Activator ProteinNF-kB, Nuclear Factor Kappa BGR, Glucocorticoid ReceptorCREB, cAMP response element binding protein
Vilazodone and Paroxetine-0.8-1.250.2-2.1

[back to top]

UKU Side-effect Profile

Number of participants with each side-effect event. (NCT01608295)
Timeframe: Each visit for 12 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Concentration DifficultiesSedationIncreased dream activityReduced salivationDiarrheaConstipationOrthostatic dizziness
Paroxetine; Paxil0331153
Vilazodone; Viibryd3133333

[back to top]

Neurocognitive Measure: The Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test

The The Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (REY-O) is a neuropsychological assessment in which measures visual perception and long-term visual memory. Total raw scores range from 0 to 36 with higher scores representing better outcomes in recall. The total raw score represents a sum of subscales scored by 18 individual elements which are scored for both distortion and placement. Two points are awarded to elements that are accurately drawn and properly placed, one point is given to distorted or misplaced elements, 0.5 points are given if an element is both distorted and misplaced, and missing or unrecognizable elements receive zero points. (NCT01608295)
Timeframe: Baseline and Final Visit

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
REY-O 3 Minute Delay BaselineREY-O 3 Minute Delay Final Visit
Paroxetine; Paxil13.316.3
Vilazodone; Viibryd13.315.2

[back to top]

Change in Brain Blood Flow Assessed by Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM)

Participants were exposed to traumatic scripts versus neutral scripts before and after treatment with paroxetine or placebo. Brain blood flow was measured using statistical parametric mapping (SPM) which analyzes brain imaging data sequences. Statistical Parametric Mapping software is only capable of producing a single z-score for each Arm/Group. Data for each participant can not be generated using this software and therefore are not available to summarize in the data table below. Regional blood flow was compared for stress and neutral conditions and before and after treatment with paroxetine or placebo. Higher z-scores indicate an increase in regional blood flow to the medial prefrontal cortex under stress conditions for the 3 month time point relative to baseline. Statistical Parametric Mapping software is only capable of producing a single z-score for each Arm/Group. (NCT01681849)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 Months Post Treatment

Interventionz-scores (Number)
Paroxetine Group22
Placebo Group2.68

[back to top]

Mean Clinical Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-IV (CAPS) Score

The CAPS is a 30-item questionnaire of PTSD symptomatology that provides continuous measures of symptom severity and frequency. CAPS-IV total symptom severity score is calculated by summing severity scores for the 17 DSM-IV PTSD symptoms. Each symptom is rated for severity based on frequency and intensity on a scale of 0-4 for a total possible severity score per symptom of 8. Criterion E (items 18-19) is duration of symptoms (minimum of one month to make the diagnosis). Items 20-30 are optional. CAPS score is based on items 1-17, CAPS score has a potential range of 0-136, with higher scores indicating greater severity of PTSD symptoms. CAPS was performed before and after treatment with paroxetine or placebo in PTSD patients. (NCT01681849)
Timeframe: Baseline, End of Study (Up to 52 Weeks)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineEnd of Study (Up to 52 Weeks)
Paroxetine Group3120
Placebo Group3025

[back to top]

Percent Change in Contrast of Parameter Estimates (COPE)

"% change in COPE = (Post-treatment COPE - Pre-treatment COPE) / Pre-treatment COPE COPE is measured during Monetary Incentive Delay Task.~Task conditions are:~Reward= BOLD signal when subject wins 5 cents vs. wins 0 cents Punishment= BOLD signal when subject loses 5cents vs. loses 0 cents" (NCT01748955)
Timeframe: Measured at Baseline (pre-treatment) and Week 8 (post-treatment)

,
InterventionPercentage change (Mean)
ACC RewardACC PunishmentAmygdala RewardAmygdala Punishment
Bupropion0.29-1.19-0.90-0.32
Paroxetine CR-2.12-1.33-0.87-0.66

[back to top]

Change in Suicidal Ideation (SSI Score)

Beck Scale of Suicidal Ideation Minimum Value = 0 Maximum Value = 38 Higher score is more severe suicidal thoughts (NCT01748955)
Timeframe: Measured at Baseline and Week 8

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 8
Bupropion113.3
Paroxetine CR4.80.3

[back to top]

Median t1/2 Single Dose Pharmacokinetics of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg

(NCT01829919)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionhours (Median)
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg6.00

[back to top]

Mean t1/2 Single Dose Pharmacokinetics of Brisdelle™ (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg

(NCT01829919)
Timeframe: Day 1

InterventionHours (Mean)
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg17.30

[back to top]

Accumulation Index Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetics of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg at Day 19

Accumulation Index is the ratio of AUC 0-24 after multiple doses versus a single dose. It is the increase in drug plasma concentration after multiple dosing until a steady state is reached. In this case the steady state Accumulation Index was calculated at Day 19. Accumulation Index is calculated at the end of the dosing period. (NCT01829919)
Timeframe: Day 19

InterventionRatio (Mean)
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg9.71

[back to top]

Cavg,ss (ng/mL) Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetics of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg

(NCT01829919)
Timeframe: Day 19

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg9.89

[back to top]

Tmax (Hour) Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetics of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg

(NCT01829919)
Timeframe: Day 19

InterventionHours (Mean)
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg6.00

[back to top]

Cmax (ng/mL) Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetics of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg

(NCT01829919)
Timeframe: Day 19

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg13.10

[back to top]

AUC (Hour*ng/mL) Single Dose Pharmacokinetics of Brisdelle™ (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg

(NCT01829919)
Timeframe: Day 1

InterventionHour*ng/mL (Mean)
AUC0-last (Hour x ng/mL)AUC0-inf (Hour x ng/mL)AUC0-24 (Hour x ng/mL)
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg86.9578.8038.90

[back to top]

Ct (ng/mL) Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetics of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg

"C(t) is the measured plasma level Concentration of the drug at time = t expressed as nanograms per milliliter." (NCT01829919)
Timeframe: Day 19

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cτ18 (ng/mL)Cτ19 (ng/mL)Cτ20 (ng/mL)
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg8.538.358.79

[back to top]

AUC (Hour*ng/mL) Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetics of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg

(NCT01829919)
Timeframe: Day 19

InterventionHour*ng/mL (Mean)
AUC0-last (Hour x ng/mL)AUC0-24 (Hour x ng/mL)
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg237.34237.28

[back to top]

Cmin (ng/mL) Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetics of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg

(NCT01829919)
Timeframe: Day 19

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg7.67

[back to top]

Cmax (ng/mL) Single Dose Pharmacokinetics of Brisdelle™ (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg

(NCT01829919)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg2.77

[back to top]

Fluctuation Index (%) Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetics of Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg

Fluctuation Index is (Cmax-Cmin)/Cavg,ss. It is peak trough fluctuation within one dosing interval at steady state. (NCT01829919)
Timeframe: Day 19

InterventionPercentage of steady state concentration (Mean)
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg75.76

[back to top]

Kel (Hour^-1) Single Dose Pharmacokinetics of Brisdelle™ (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg

(NCT01829919)
Timeframe: Day 1

InterventionHour^(-1) (Mean)
Brisdelle (Paroxetine Mesylate) Capsules 7.5 mg0.05

[back to top]

Money Earned

"Change in amount of money earned between baseline and after 6 weeks of antidepressant treatment is determined through a summary score from a variety of decision-making tasks. Participants received between $5 and $40 per visit, depending on the outcomes of the decisions made on the computerized tasks. Variable payment ensured that the decision-making tasks were approached realistically, as opposed to using hypothetical points that do not have meaning in the real world. Greater earnings indicate better financial decision-making.~The specific tasks were:~risk task~balloon analogue risk task~temporal discounting task~ultimatum game~continuous performance task" (NCT01916824)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

,
InterventionUS Dollars (Mean)
Baseline VisitAfter 6 Weeks of Treatment
Healthy Controls25.021.9
Participants With Major Depressive Disorder23.220.5

[back to top]

Brief Pain Inventory

A brief measure scored on a 0 to 10 scale to assess a patient's pain, with a higher score indicating more severe pain; a score of 0 indicates no pain and a score of 10 indicates very severe pain. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline3 Month6 Month12 Month
Intervention6.84.34.13.9
Usual Care6.74.74.53.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Over the Course of the Year After Injury

The investigators will use the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) as a continuous measure. The 10-item scale score ranges from 0-40, with higher values indicating a worse outcome. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Change from Baseline at 3 MonthsChange from Baseline at 6 MonthsChange from Baseline at 12 Months
Intervention-2.04-1.69-1.81
Usual Care-1.90-1.63-1.45

[back to top]

Change From Baseline Patient Health Questionnaire 9 Item Depression Scale Over the Course of the Year After Injury

The investigators will use the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item Depression Scale (PHQ-9). The scoring of the scale ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 27, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Change from Baseline at 3 MonthsChange from Baseline at 6 MonthsChange from Baseline at 12 Months
Intervention-0.79-1.17-1.84
Usual Care-0.50-0.90-2.16

[back to top]

Change From Baseline PTSD Checklist- Civilian (PCL-C) Over the Course of the Year After Injury

The investigators will use the PTSD Checklist - Civilian (PCL-C). The scoring of the scale ranges from a minimum of 17 to a maximum of 85, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. The measure can also provide a rating of symptoms consistent with a diagnosis of PTSD. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Change from Baseline at 3 MonthsChange from Baseline at 6 MonthsChange from Baseline at 12 Months
Intervention-1.65-4.02-5.51
Usual Care0.08-1.44-4.25

[back to top]

Change From Baseline Short Form (SF)-12/36 Physical Function Over the Course of the Year After Injury

The investigators used the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form healthy survey (MOS SF-12/36) physical components summary to assess physical function. The minimum and maximum scores are 0-100 with higher scores representing a better outcome. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Change from Baseline at 3 MonthsChange from Baseline at 6 MonthsChange from Baseline at 12 Months
Intervention-16.78-14.17-13.23
Usual Care-15.90-13.83-11.68

[back to top]

Cognitive Impairment Scale

The investigators will use the National Study on the Costs and Outcomes of Trauma (NSCOT) Cognitive Screen, a 4 - Item Traumatic Brain Injury / Post-concussive Symptom Screen. The scoring of the scale ranges from a minimum of 4 to a maximum of 20, with lower scores indicating a worse outcome. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline3 Month6 Month12 Month
Intervention13.513.313.213.8
Usual Care13.413.213.414.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Marijuana Use

Single items that assess marijuana use. Single item self-report dichotomized as none versus at least monthly use. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline3 Month6 Month12 Month
Intervention125606051
Usual Care177728279

[back to top]

Number of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Stimulant Use

Single items that assess non-prescribed stimulant use. Single item self-report dichotomized as none versus at least monthly use. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline3 Month6 Month12 Month
Intervention58978
Usual Care77172216

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation

Item 9 of the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item (PHQ-9) scale assesses suicidal ideation. It is scored from 0 to 3, with a score of 1 or greater indicating a patient has suicidal ideation. Participants with a PHQ-9 item 9 score of greater than or equal to 1 are reported for this outcome. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline3 Month6 Month12 Month
Intervention67696351
Usual Care909910692

[back to top]

SF-36 Quality of Life

The SF-36 assess quality of life domains that span emotional health, overall health status, and role function; a score of 100 indicates perfect health and a score of 0 indicates extremely poor health. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline3 Month6 Month12 Month
Intervention44.338.338.439.2
Usual Care45.139.139.541.4

[back to top]

TSOS Patient Satisfaction: Mental Health Care

Satisfaction with mental health care was rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 indicating very dissatisfied and 5 indicating very satisfied. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 Month, 6 Month, 12 Month

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline3 Month6 Month12 Month
Intervention4.13.63.63.7
Usual Care4.03.53.43.5

[back to top]

TSOS Patient Satisfaction: Overall Health Care

Satisfaction with health care was rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 indicating very dissatisfied and 5 indicating very satisfied. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline3 Month6 Month12 Month
Intervention4.43.94.03.9
Usual Care4.43.83.83.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants Endorsing a Single Item That Assesses Opioid Use

Single items that assess non-prescribed opioid use. Single item self-report dichotomized as none versus at least monthly use. (NCT02655354)
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, 12-month

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline3 Month6 Month12 Month
Intervention18446
Usual Care4415206

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Meeting Criteria for Sexual Dysfunction at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5

Sexual dysfunction is defined as CSFQ-14 score ≤47 for men and ≤41 for women. (NCT02932904)
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5
Paroxetine 20 mg2.48.48.49.69.6
Placebo2.27.94.54.53.4
Vortioxetine 10 mg1.23.53.54.75.9
Vortioxetine 20 mg1.12.26.67.79.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in CSFQ-14 3 Phases of the Sexual Response Cycle (Desire, Arousal, and Orgasm/Completion) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5

The CSFQ-14 is a structured, self-reported questionnaire designed to measure illness- and medication-related changes in sexual functioning consisting of 14 items that measure sexual functioning on the 3 phases of the sexual response cycle , desire (5 items, score range 5-25), arousal (3 items, score range 3-15), and orgasm (3 items, score range 3-15), rated on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5. Higher scores reflect higher sexual functioning. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms have worsened. (NCT02932904)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5

,,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Desire Score: Week 1Desire Score: Week 2Desire Score: Week 3Desire Score: Week 4Desire Score: Week 5Arousal Score: Week 1Arousal Score: Week 2Arousal Score: Week 3Arousal Score: Week 4Arousal Score: Week 5Orgasm/Completion/Ejaculation Score: Week 1Orgasm/Completion/Ejaculation Score: Week 2Orgasm/Completion/Ejaculation Score: Week 3Orgasm/Completion/Ejaculation Score: Week 4Orgasm/Completion/Ejaculation Score: Week 5
Paroxetine 20 mg-0.50-0.83-1.09-1.07-1.38-0.30-0.47-0.43-0.54-0.67-0.48-0.61-0.75-1.04-1.09
Placebo0.09-0.40-0.50-0.36-0.42-0.01-0.34-0.22-0.11-0.19-0.12-0.21-0.20-0.14-0.12
Vortioxetine 10 mg-0.23-0.34-0.22-0.37-0.19-0.05-0.35-0.08-0.10-0.03-0.22-0.26-0.33-0.45-0.42
Vortioxetine 20 mg-0.14-0.68-0.77-0.77-0.82-0.03-0.30-0.51-0.54-0.54-0.15-0.37-0.67-0.72-0.79

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in CSFQ-14 Total Score Difference for Vortioxetine Versus Placebo at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5

The CSFQ-14 is a structured, self-reported questionnaire designed to measure illness- and medication-related changes in sexual functioning consisting of 14 items that measure sexual functioning as a total score (14 items) and on the subscales of pleasure (1 item), desire/frequency (2 items), desire/interest (3 items), arousal (3 items), orgasm (3 items) and 2 additional items are included in the total score, but do not map to a specific phase of the sexual response cycle, rated on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5 with a total score range from 14 to 70. Higher scores reflect higher sexual functioning. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms have worsened. (NCT02932904)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5
Placebo-0.05-1.11-0.91-0.62-0.79
Vortioxetine 10 mg-0.54-1.18-0.77-1.20-0.82
Vortioxetine 20 mg-0.38-1.55-2.36-2.43-2.51

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the CSFQ-14 Total Score Difference for Vortioxetine Versus Paroxetine at Week 5 in Modified Full Analysis Set 2 (mFAS2)

The CSFQ-14 is a structured, self-reported questionnaire designed to measure illness- and medication-related changes in sexual functioning consisting of 14 items that measure sexual functioning as a total score (14 items) and on the subscales of pleasure (1 item), desire/frequency (2 items), desire/interest (3 items), arousal (3 items), orgasm (3 items) and 2 additional items are included in the total score, but do not map to a specific phase of the sexual response cycle, rated on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5 with a total score range from 14 to 70. Higher scores reflect higher sexual functioning. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms have worsened. (NCT02932904)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 5

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline at Week 5
Paroxetine 20 mg58.73-4.78
Vortioxetine 10 mg58.53-0.47
Vortioxetine 20 mg59.23-1.72

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the CSFQ-14 Total Score Difference for Vortioxetine Versus Paroxetine at Week 5 in Modified Full Analysis Set 1 (mFAS1)

The CSFQ-14 is a structured, self-reported questionnaire designed to measure illness- and medication-related changes in sexual functioning consisting of 14 items that measure sexual functioning as a total score (14 items) and on the subscales of pleasure (1 item), desire/frequency (2 items), desire/interest (3 items), arousal (3 items), orgasm (3 items) and 2 additional items are included in the total score, but do not map to a specific phase of the sexual response cycle, rated on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5 with a total score range from 14 to 70. Higher scores reflect higher sexual functioning. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms have worsened. (NCT02932904)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 5

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline at Week 5
Paroxetine 20 mg59.13-4.01
Vortioxetine 10 mg58.55-0.63
Vortioxetine 20 mg59.36-2.38

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in CSFQ-14 Total Score Difference for Paroxetine Versus Placebo at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5

The CSFQ-14 is a structured, self-reported questionnaire designed to measure illness- and medication-related changes in sexual functioning consisting of 14 items that measure sexual functioning as a total score (14 items) and on the subscales of pleasure (1 item), desire/frequency (2 items), desire/interest (3 items), arousal (3 items), orgasm (3 items) and 2 additional items are included in the total score, but do not map to a specific phase of the sexual response cycle, rated on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5 with a total score range from 14 to 70. Higher scores reflect higher sexual functioning. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms have worsened. (NCT02932904)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5
Paroxetine 20 mg-1.67-2.40-2.77-3.11-3.56
Placebo-0.05-1.11-0.91-0.62-0.79

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in CSFQ-14 Subscales 5 Dimensions at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5

The CSFQ-14 is a structured, self-reported questionnaire designed to measure illness- and medication-related changes in sexual functioning consisting of 14 items that measure sexual functioning on the subscales of pleasure (1 item, score range 1-5), desire/frequency (2 items, score range 2-10), desire/interest (3 items, score range 3-15), arousal (3 items, score range 3-15), and orgasm (3 items, score range 3-15), rated on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5. Higher scores reflect higher sexual functioning. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms have worsened. (NCT02932904)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5

,,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pleasure Score: Week 1Pleasure Score: Week 2Pleasure Score: Week 3Pleasure Score: Week 4Pleasure Score: Week 5Desire/Frequency Score: Week 1Desire/Frequency Score: Week 2Desire/Frequency Score: Week 3Desire/Frequency Score: Week 4Desire/Frequency Score: Week 5Desire/Interest Score: Week 1Desire/Interest Score: Week 2Desire/Interest Score: Week 3Desire/Interest Score: Week 4Desire/Interest Score: Week 5Arousal/Excitement/Erection Score: Week 1Arousal/Excitement/Erection Score: Week 2Arousal/Excitement/Erection Score: Week 3Arousal/Excitement/Erection Score: Week 4Arousal/Excitement/Erection Score: Week 5Orgasm/Completion/Ejaculation Score: Week 1Orgasm/Completion/Ejaculation Score: Week 2Orgasm/Completion/Ejaculation Score: Week 3Orgasm/Completion/Ejaculation Score: Week 4Orgasm/Completion/Ejaculation Score: Week 5
Paroxetine 20 mg-0.36-0.38-0.44-0.38-0.47-0.35-0.46-0.62-0.55-0.66-0.15-0.38-0.47-0.52-0.73-0.30-0.47-0.43-0.54-0.67-0.48-0.61-0.75-1.04-1.09
Placebo-0.07-0.26-0.23-0.18-0.21-0.03-0.30-0.33-0.25-0.280.12-0.09-0.16-0.11-0.14-0.01-0.34-0.22-0.11-0.19-0.12-0.21-0.20-0.14-0.12
Vortioxetine 10 mg-0.13-0.25-0.18-0.31-0.16-0.07-0.25-0.23-0.20-0.15-0.16-0.11-0.01-0.18-0.05-0.05-0.35-0.08-0.10-0.03-0.22-0.26-0.33-0.45-0.42
Vortioxetine 20 mg-0.15-0.26-0.42-0.37-0.33-0.23-0.46-0.50-0.43-0.490.09-0.22-0.28-0.35-0.33-0.03-0.30-0.51-0.54-0.54-0.15-0.37-0.67-0.72-0.79

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the CSFQ-14 Total Score Difference for Vortioxetine Versus Paroxetine at Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4

The CSFQ-14 is a structured, self-reported questionnaire designed to measure illness- and medication-related changes in sexual functioning consisting of 14 items that measure sexual functioning as a total score (14 items) and on the subscales of pleasure (1 item), desire/frequency (2 items), desire/interest (3 items), arousal (3 items), orgasm (3 items) and 2 additional items are included in the total score, but do not map to a specific phase of the sexual response cycle, rated on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5 with a total score range from 14 to 70. Higher scores reflect higher sexual functioning. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms have worsened. (NCT02932904)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4
Paroxetine 20 mg-1.67-2.40-2.77-3.11
Vortioxetine 10 mg-0.54-1.18-0.77-1.20
Vortioxetine 20 mg-0.38-1.55-2.36-2.43

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ-14) Total Score Difference for Vortioxetine Versus Paroxetine at Week 5 in Full Analysis Set (FAS)

The CSFQ-14 is a structured, self-reported questionnaire designed to measure illness- and medication-related changes in sexual functioning consisting of 14 items that measure sexual functioning as a total score (14 items) and on the subscales of pleasure (1 item), desire/frequency (2 items), desire/interest (3 items), arousal (3 items), orgasm (3 items) and 2 additional items are included in the total score, but do not map to a specific phase of the sexual response cycle, rated on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5 with a total score range from 14 to 70. Higher scores reflect higher sexual functioning. A negative change from baseline indicates that symptoms have worsened. (NCT02932904)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 5

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline at Week 5
Paroxetine 20 mg59.27-3.56
Vortioxetine 10 mg58.56-0.82
Vortioxetine 20 mg59.43-2.51

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Values Relative to PCI Criteria on Day 16 Under Fasting Condition

Blood samples were collected to analyze; Hct, Hb, erythrocytes and platelets. PCI ranges were Hct (Male [low: <0.03 proportion of red blood cells in blood and high: >0.54 proportion of red blood cells in blood] and Female [low: <0.04 proportion of red blood cells in blood and high: >0.54 proportion of red blood cells in blood]), Hb (Male [low: <110 grams per liter and high: >180 grams per liter) and Female [low: <100 grams per liter and high: >170 grams per liter]), erythrocytes (Male [low: <4.5x10^12 cells per liter and high: >5.5x10^12 cells per liter] and Female [low: <4 x10^12 cells per liter and high: >5 x10^12 cells per liter]) and platelets (low: <80x10^9 cells per liter and high: >400x10^9 cells per liter). Participants were counted in the category that their value changed to (low, normal or high). If values were unchanged (example: High to High), or whose value became normal, were recorded in the 'To Normal or No Change' category. Data has been presented treatment-wise. (NCT03329573)
Timeframe: Day 16

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Erythrocytes, To lowErythrocytes, To normal or no changeErythrocytes, To highHct, To lowHct, To normal or no changeHct, To highHb, To lowHb, To normal or no changeHb, To highPlatelets, To lowPlatelets, To normal or no changePlatelets, To high
Paroxetine 40 mg, GSKT- Fasted1180019001900190
Paroxetine 40 mg, Mississauga- Fasted0190019001900190

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Non-SAE and SAEs Under Fasting Condition

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and other situations according to medical or scientific judgement or events associated with liver injury and impaired liver function. Data has been presented treatment-wise. (NCT03329573)
Timeframe: Up to Day 26

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any non-SAEsAny SAEs
Paroxetine 40 mg, GSKT- Fasted120
Paroxetine 40 mg, Mississauga- Fasted160

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Under Fed Condition

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and other situations according to medical or scientific judgement or events associated with liver injury and impaired liver function. Data has been presented treatment-wise. (NCT03329573)
Timeframe: Up to Day 26

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any non-SAEsAny SAEs
Paroxetine 40 mg, GSKT- Fed140
Paroxetine 40 mg, Mississauga- Fed130

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Urinalysis Results by Dipstick Method Under Fasting Condition

Urine samples were collected to assess urine occult blood, urine glucose, urine ketones, urine protein and monitor urine pH. The dipstick test gave results in a semi-quantitative manner, and results for urinalysis parameters (except urine pH) were recorded as negative and positive, indicating proportional concentrations in the urine sample. pH is a measure of hydrogen ion concentration and is used to determine the acidity or alkalinity of urine. Urine pH is calculated on a scale of 0 to 14, values on the scale refer to the degree of alkalinity or acidity. A pH of 7 is neutral. A pH of less than 7 is acidic and a pH of greater than 7 is basic. Normal urine has a slightly acidic pH (5.0-6.0). Dipstick test results for pH were presented as number of participants having pH value as 5, 6, 6.5, 7 or 8. Data has been presented treatment-wise. (NCT03329573)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day-7 to Day -1) and Day 16

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Glucose, Baseline, Negative,Glucose, Baseline, Positive,Glucose, Day 16, Negative,Glucose, Day 16, Positive,Ketones, Baseline, NegativeKetones, Baseline, PositiveKetones, Day 16,PositiveKetones, Day 16, NegativeOccult blood, Baseline, PositiveOccult blood, Baseline, NegativeOccult blood, Day 16, PositiveOccult blood, Day 16, NegativeProtein, Baseline, NegativeProtein, Baseline, PositiveProtein, Day 16, PositiveProtein, Day 16, NegativepH=5, BaselinepH=6, BaselinepH=6.5, BaselinepH=7, BaselinepH=8, BaselinepH=5, Day 16pH=6, Day 16pH=6.5, Day 16pH=7, Day 16pH=8, Day 16
Paroxetine 40 mg, GSKT- Fasted19019019011801931619001932563413020
Paroxetine 40 mg, Mississauga- Fasted19019019011811811819011823491611020

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Urinalysis Results by Dipstick Method Under Fed Condition

Urine samples were collected to assess urine occult blood, urine glucose, urine ketones, urine protein and monitor urine potential of hydrogen (pH). The dipstick test gave results in a semi-quantitative manner, and results for urinalysis parameters (except urine pH) were recorded as negative and positive, indicating proportional concentrations in the urine sample. pH is a measure of hydrogen ion concentration and is used to determine the acidity or alkalinity of urine. Urine pH is calculated on a scale of 0 to 14, values on the scale refer to the degree of alkalinity or acidity. A pH of 7 is neutral. A pH of less than 7 is acidic and a pH of greater than 7 is basic. Normal urine has a slightly acidic pH (5.0-6.0). Dipstick test results for pH were presented as number of participants having pH value as 5, 6, 6.5, 7 or 8. Data has been presented treatment-wise. (NCT03329573)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day-7 to Day -1) and Day 16

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Glucose, Baseline, Negative, n=22,25Glucose, Baseline, Positive, n=22,25Glucose, Day 16, Negative, n=22,22Glucose, Day 16, Positive, n=22,22Ketones, Baseline, Positive, n=22,25Ketones, Baseline, Negative, n=22,25Ketones, Day 16, Positive,n=22,22Ketones, Day 16, Negative,n=22,22Occult blood, Baseline, Positive,n=22,25Occult blood, Baseline, Negative,n=22,25Occult blood, Day 16, Positive,n=22,22Occult blood, Day 16, Negative,n=22,22Protein, Baseline, Negative,n=22,25Protein, Baseline, Positive,n=22,25Protein, Day 16, Positive,n=22,22Protein, Day 16, Negative,n=22,22pH=5, Baseline,n=22,25pH=6, Baseline,n=22,25pH=6.5, Baseline,n=22,25pH=7, Baseline,n=22,25pH=8, Baseline,n=22,25pH=5, Day 16,n=22,22pH=6, Day 16,n=22,22pH=6.5, Day 16,n=22,22pH=7, Day 16,n=22,22pH=8, Day 16,n=22,22
Paroxetine 40 mg, GSKT- Fed22022022012122051722012117392212440
Paroxetine 40 mg, Mississauga- Fed250220124022322319250022456100410260

[back to top]

Pulse Rate (PR) at Indicated Time-points Under Fasting Condition

Vital sign including PR was measured at the indicated time-points and summarized during the study to evaluate the safety of the participants. Data has been presented treatment-wise. (NCT03329573)
Timeframe: Day 1 (post-dose), Day 2 (post-dose), Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 11, Day 12 (pre-dose), Day 12 (post-dose), Day 13 (post-dose), Day 14, Day 15, Day 16

,
InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
Day 1 (post-dose)Day 2 (post-dose)Day 3Day 4Day 5Day 11Day 12 (pre-dose)Day 12 (post-dose)Day 13 (post-dose)Day 14Day 15Day 16
Paroxetine 40 mg, GSKT- Fasted65.474.874.974.267.381.866.567.578.178.978.275.7
Paroxetine 40 mg, Mississauga- Fasted67.575.377.272.871.284.166.865.275.476.875.971.3

[back to top]

Pulse Rate (PR) at Indicated Time-points Under Fed Condition

Vital sign including PR was measured at the indicated time-points and summarized during the study to evaluate the safety of the participants. Data has been presented treatment-wise. (NCT03329573)
Timeframe: Day 1 (post-dose), Day 2 (post-dose), Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 11, Day 12 (pre-dose), Day 12 (post-dose), Day 13 (post-dose), Day 14, Day 15, Day 16

,
InterventionBeats per minute (Mean)
Day 1 (post-dose), n=23,24Day 2 (post-dose), n=23,24Day 3, n=23,24Day 4, n=23,24Day 5, n=23,24Day 11, n=21,22Day 12 (pre-dose), n=21,22Day 12 (post-dose), n=20,22Day 13 (post-dose), n=20,22Day 14, n=20,22Day 15, n=20,22Day 16, n=20,22
Paroxetine 40 mg, GSKT- Fed72.372.874.075.568.775.065.872.873.775.677.569.4
Paroxetine 40 mg, Mississauga- Fed72.074.175.875.768.377.764.776.273.877.675.572.6

[back to top]

t1/2 of Paroxetine Following Single Oral Dose in Healthy Chinese Participants Under Fasting Condition

Blood samples were collected at designated timepoints. PK parameters of Paroxetine were calculated using non-compartmental methods. Geometric mean and 95% CI have been presented. (NCT03329573)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5 hour, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, 6 hours, 7 hours, 8 hours, 10 hours, 12 hours, 16 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 96 hours post-dose in each treatment period

InterventionHours (Geometric Mean)
Paroxetine 40 mg, GSKT- Fasted14.3515
Paroxetine 40 mg, Mississauga- Fasted14.0311

[back to top]

Respiratory Rate (RR) at Indicated Time-point Under Fed Condition

Vital sign including RR was measured at the indicated time-point and summarized during the study to evaluate the safety of the participants. Data has been presented treatment-wise. (NCT03329573)
Timeframe: Day 11

InterventionBreaths per minute (Mean)
Paroxetine 40 mg, GSKT- Fed17.8
Paroxetine 40 mg, Mississauga- Fed18.6

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Paroxetine Following Single Oral Dose in Healthy Chinese Participants Under Fed Condition

Blood samples were collected at designated timepoints. PK parameters of Paroxetine were calculated using non-compartmental methods. Statistical analysis of PK parameters was done using mixed effect model for evaluation of BE. Point estimate and associated adjusted 90% CI of difference between both the treatments were provided for Cmax. (NCT03329573)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5 hour, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, 6 hours, 7 hours, 8 hours, 10 hours, 12 hours, 16 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 96 hours post-dose in each treatment period

InterventionNanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Paroxetine 40 mg, GSKT- Fed39.95
Paroxetine 40 mg, Mississauga- Fed39.02

[back to top]

Lambda z of Paroxetine Following Single Oral Dose in Healthy Chinese Participants Under Fasting Condition

Blood samples were collected at designated timepoints. PK parameters of Paroxetine were calculated using non-compartmental methods. Geometric mean and 95% CI of Lambda z have been presented. (NCT03329573)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5 hour, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, 6 hours, 7 hours, 8 hours, 10 hours, 12 hours, 16 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 96 hours post-dose in each treatment period

InterventionPer hour (Geometric Mean)
Paroxetine 40 mg, GSKT- Fasted0.0483
Paroxetine 40 mg, Mississauga- Fasted0.0494

[back to top]

Cmax of Paroxetine Following Single Oral Dose in Healthy Chinese Participants Under Fasting Condition

Blood samples were collected at designated timepoints. PK parameters of Paroxetine were calculated using non-compartmental methods. Statistical analysis of PK parameters was done using mixed effect model for evaluation of BE. Point estimate and associated adjusted 90% CI of difference between both the treatments were provided for Cmax. (NCT03329573)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5 hour, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, 6 hours, 7 hours, 8 hours, 10 hours, 12 hours, 16 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 96 hours post-dose in each treatment period

InterventionNanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Paroxetine 40 mg, GSKT- Fasted36.86
Paroxetine 40 mg, Mississauga- Fasted36.15

[back to top]

AUC(0-t) of Paroxetine Following Single Oral Dose in Healthy Chinese Participants Under Fasting Condition

Blood samples were collected at designated timepoints. PK parameters of Paroxetine were calculated using non-compartmental methods. Statistical analysis of PK parameters was done using mixed effect model for evaluation of BE. Point estimate and associated adjusted 90% CI of difference between both the treatments were provided for AUC(0-t). (NCT03329573)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5 hour, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, 6 hours, 7 hours, 8 hours, 10 hours, 12 hours, 16 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 96 hours post-dose in each treatment period

InterventionHour*nanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Paroxetine 40 mg, GSKT- Fasted750.49
Paroxetine 40 mg, Mississauga- Fasted753.83

[back to top]

AUC(0-infinity) of Paroxetine Following Single Oral Dose in Healthy Chinese Participants Under Fasting Condition

Blood samples were collected at designated timepoints. PK parameters of Paroxetine were calculated using non-compartmental methods. Statistical analysis of PK parameters was done using mixed effect model for evaluation of BE. Point estimate and associated adjusted 90% CI of difference between both the treatments were provided for AUC(0-infinity). (NCT03329573)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5 hour, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, 6 hours, 7 hours, 8 hours, 10 hours, 12 hours, 16 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 96 hours post-dose in each treatment period

InterventionHour*nanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Paroxetine 40 mg, GSKT- Fasted742.07
Paroxetine 40 mg, Mississauga- Fasted745.22

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Values Relative to PCI Criteria on Day 16 Under Fed Condition

Blood samples were collected to analyze; hematocrit(Hct),hemoglobin(Hb),erythrocytes and platelets. PCI ranges; Hct(Male[low: <0.03 proportion of red blood cells in blood and high: >0.54 proportion of red blood cells in blood] and Female[low: <0.04 proportion of red blood cells in blood and high: >0.54 proportion of red blood cells in blood]),Hb(Male [low: <110 grams per liter and high: >180 grams per liter) and Female[low: <100 grams per liter and high: >170 grams per liter]),erythrocytes(Male [low: <4.5x10^12 cells per liter and high: >5.5x10^12 cells per liter] and Female[low: <4 x10^12 cells per liter and high: >5 x10^12 cells per liter]) and platelets(low: <80x10^9 cells per liter and high: >400x10^9 cells per liter). Participants were counted in the category that their value changed to(low, normal or high). If values were unchanged(example: High to High), or whose value became normal, were recorded in the 'To Normal or No Change' category.Data has been presented treatment-wise. (NCT03329573)
Timeframe: Day 16

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Erythrocytes, To lowErythrocytes, To normal or no changeErythrocytes, To highHct, To lowHct, To normal or no changeHct, To highHb, To lowHb, To normal or no changeHb, To highPlatelets, To lowPlatelets, To normal or no changePlatelets, To high
Paroxetine 40 mg, GSKT- Fed2200022002200220
Paroxetine 40 mg, Mississauga- Fed2191022002200220

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUC[0-infinity]) of Paroxetine Following Single Oral Dose in Healthy Chinese Participants Under Fed Condition

Blood samples were collected at designated time points. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of Paroxetine were calculated using non-compartmental methods. Statistical analysis of PK parameters was done using mixed effect model for evaluation of bioequivalence (BE). Point estimate and associated adjusted 90% confidence interval (CI) of difference between both the treatments were provided for AUC(0-infinity). (NCT03329573)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5 hour, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, 6 hours, 7 hours, 8 hours, 10 hours, 12 hours, 16 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 96 hours post-dose in each treatment period

InterventionHour*nanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Paroxetine 40 mg, GSKT- Fed860.54
Paroxetine 40 mg, Mississauga- Fed812.49

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Chemistry Laboratory Values Relative to Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria on Day 16 Under Fed Condition

Blood samples were collected to analyze the clinical chemistry laboratory parameters; alanine aminotransferase (ALT), albumin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST),calcium,creatinine, glucose, potassium (Pot) and sodium. PCI ranges were ALT (high: >=2 times upper limit of normal [ULN] units per liter [U/L]),albumin (low: <30 grams per liter),ALP (low: <20 international units per liter [IU/L] and high: >200 IU/L), AST (high: >=2 times ULN U/L),calcium (low: <2 millimoles per liter [mmol/L] and high: >2.75 mmol/L),creatinine (high: >133 micromoles per liter), glucose (low: <3 mmol/L and high: >9 mmol/L), Pot (low: <3 mmol/L and high: >5.5 mmol/L) and sodium (low: <130 mmol/L and high: >150 mmol/L). Participants were counted in the category that their value changed to (low, normal or high). If values were unchanged (example: High to High), or whose value became normal, were recorded in the 'To Normal or No Change' category. Data has been presented treatment-wise. (NCT03329573)
Timeframe: Day 16

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ALT, To lowALT, To normal or no changeALT, To highAlbumin, To lowAlbumin, To normal or no changeAlbumin, To highALP, To lowALP, To normal or no changeALP, To highAST, To lowAST, To normal or no changeAST, To highCalcium, To lowCalcium, To normal or no changeCalcium, To highCreatinine, To lowCreatinine, To normal or no changeCreatinine, To highGlucose, To lowGlucose, To normal or no changeGlucose, To highPot, To lowPot, To normal or no changePot, To highSodium, To lowSodium, To normal or no changeSodium, To high
Paroxetine 40 mg, GSKT- Fed022002200220022002200220022002200220
Paroxetine 40 mg, Mississauga- Fed022002200220022002200220022002200220

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Administration Extrapolated to the Last Time of Quantifiable Concentration (AUC[0-t]) of Paroxetine Following Single Oral Dose in Healthy Chinese Participants Under Fed Condition

Blood samples were collected at designated timepoints. PK parameters of Paroxetine were calculated using non-compartmental methods. Statistical analysis of PK parameters was done using mixed effect model for evaluation of BE. Point estimate and associated adjusted 90% CI of difference between both the treatments were provided for AUC(0-t). (NCT03329573)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5 hour, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, 6 hours, 7 hours, 8 hours, 10 hours, 12 hours, 16 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 96 hours post-dose in each treatment period

InterventionHour*nanogram per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Paroxetine 40 mg, GSKT- Fed866.85
Paroxetine 40 mg, Mississauga- Fed814.75

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings for Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters Under Fed Condition

A single 12-lead ECGs was obtained using an ECG machine that automatically calculates the heart rate and measures PR, QRS, QT and QT corrected (QTc) intervals. Clinically significant abnormal ranges were: heart rate: lower:<50 beats per minute and upper: >110 beats per minute; QT: Upper: >400 milliseconds (msec); QTc: Upper: >450 msec; PR: lower: <110 msec and upper: >220 msec; QRS: lower: <60 msec and upper: >120 msec. The number of participants with abnormal findings for ECG parameters have been presented. Data has been presented treatment-wise. (NCT03329573)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day-7 to Day -1) and Day 16

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline, n=22, 25Day 16, n=22, 22
Paroxetine 40 mg, GSKT- Fed01
Paroxetine 40 mg, Mississauga- Fed00

[back to top]

DBP and SBP at Indicated Time-points Under Fasting Condition

Vital signs including DBP and SBP were measured at the indicated time-points and summarized during the study to evaluate the safety of the participants. Data has been presented treatment-wise. (NCT03329573)
Timeframe: Day 1 (post-dose), Day 2 (post-dose), Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 11, Day 12 (pre-dose), Day 12 (post-dose), Day 13 (post-dose), Day 14, Day 15, Day 16

,
InterventionMillimeters of mercury (Mean)
DBP, Day 1 (post-dose)DBP, Day 2 (post-dose)DBP, Day 3DBP, Day 4DBP, Day 5DBP, Day 11DBP, Day 12 (pre-dose)DBP, Day 12 (post-dose)DBP, Day 13 (post-dose)DBP, Day 14DBP, Day 15DBP, Day 16SBP, Day 1 (post-dose)SBP, Day 2 (post-dose)SBP, Day 3SBP, Day 4SBP, Day 5SBP, Day 11SBP, Day 12 (pre-dose)SBP, Day 12 (post-dose)SBP, Day 13 (post-dose)SBP, Day 14SBP, Day 15SBP, Day 16
Paroxetine 40 mg, GSKT- Fasted71.868.366.268.368.171.972.673.572.672.270.671.9107.4108.1106.3105.1104.4113.2108.3111.6111.7110.5108.5110.7
Paroxetine 40 mg, Mississauga- Fasted70.968.767.868.873.371.471.270.369.670.268.771.1109.2110.1108.2107.4111.3111.4107.4107.5109.9104.5107.4104.2

[back to top]

Tmax of Paroxetine Following Single Oral Dose in Healthy Chinese Participants Under Fasting Condition

Blood samples were collected at designated timepoints. PK parameters of Paroxetine were calculated using non-compartmental methods. Median and full range of Tmax have been presented. (NCT03329573)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5 hour, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, 6 hours, 7 hours, 8 hours, 10 hours, 12 hours, 16 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 96 hours post-dose in each treatment period

InterventionHours (Median)
Paroxetine 40 mg, GSKT- Fasted5.00
Paroxetine 40 mg, Mississauga- Fasted5.00

[back to top]

Time to Reach Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Paroxetine Following Single Oral Dose in Healthy Chinese Participants Under Fed Condition

Blood samples were collected at designated timepoints. PK parameters of Paroxetine were calculated using non-compartmental methods. Median and full range of Tmax have been presented. (NCT03329573)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5 hour, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, 6 hours, 7 hours, 8 hours, 10 hours, 12 hours, 16 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 96 hours post-dose in each treatment period

InterventionHours (Median)
Paroxetine 40 mg, GSKT- Fed5.00
Paroxetine 40 mg, Mississauga- Fed5.00

[back to top]

Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (Lambda z) of Paroxetine Following Single Oral Dose in Healthy Chinese Participants Under Fed Condition

Blood samples were collected at designated timepoints. PK parameters of Paroxetine were calculated using non-compartmental methods. Geometric mean and 95% CI of Lambda z have been presented. (NCT03329573)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5 hour, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, 6 hours, 7 hours, 8 hours, 10 hours, 12 hours, 16 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 96 hours post-dose in each treatment period

InterventionPer hour (Geometric Mean)
Paroxetine 40 mg, GSKT- Fed0.0433
Paroxetine 40 mg, Mississauga- Fed0.0462

[back to top]

Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of Paroxetine Following Single Oral Dose in Healthy Chinese Participants Under Fed Condition

Blood samples were collected at designated timepoints. PK parameters of Paroxetine were calculated using non-compartmental methods. Geometric mean and 95% CI have been presented. (NCT03329573)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5 hour, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, 6 hours, 7 hours, 8 hours, 10 hours, 12 hours, 16 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 96 hours post-dose in each treatment period

InterventionHours (Geometric Mean)
Paroxetine 40 mg, GSKT- Fed16.0002
Paroxetine 40 mg, Mississauga- Fed14.9913

[back to top]

Temperature at Indicated Time-point Under Fed Condition

Vital sign including temperature was measured at the indicated time-point and summarized during the study to evaluate the safety of the participants. Data has been presented treatment-wise. (NCT03329573)
Timeframe: Day 11

InterventionCelsius (Mean)
Paroxetine 40 mg, GSKT- Fed36.70
Paroxetine 40 mg, Mississauga- Fed36.59

[back to top]

Temperature at Indicated Time-point Under Fasting Condition

Vital sign including temperature was measured at the indicated time-point and summarized during the study to evaluate the safety of the participants. Data has been presented treatment-wise. (NCT03329573)
Timeframe: Day 11

InterventionCelsius (Mean)
Paroxetine 40 mg, GSKT- Fasted36.84
Paroxetine 40 mg, Mississauga- Fasted36.74

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Chemistry Laboratory Values Relative to PCI Criteria on Day 16 Under Fasting Condition

Blood samples were collected to analyze the clinical chemistry laboratory parameters; ALT, albumin, ALP, AST, calcium, creatinine, glucose, Pot and sodium. PCI ranges were ALT (high: >=2 times ULN U/L), albumin (low: <30 grams per liter), ALP (low: <20 IU/L and high: >200 IU/L), AST (high: >=2 times ULN U/L), calcium (low: <2 mmol/L and high: >2.75 mmol/L), creatinine (high: >133 micromoles per liter), glucose (low: <3 mmol/L and high: >9 mmol/L), Pot (low: <3 mmol/L and high: >5.5 mmol/L) and sodium (low: <130 mmol/L and high: >150 mmol/L). Participants were counted in the category that their value changed to (low, normal or high). If values were unchanged (example: High to High), or whose value became normal, were recorded in the 'To Normal or No Change' category. Data has been presented treatment-wise. (NCT03329573)
Timeframe: Day 16

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ALT, To lowALT, To normal or no changeALT, To highAlbumin, To lowAlbumin, To normal or no changeAlbumin, To highALP, To lowALP, To normal or no changeALP, To highAST, To lowAST, To normal or no changeAST, To highCalcium, To lowCalcium, To normal or no changeCalcium, To highCreatinine, To lowCreatinine, To normal or no changeCreatinine, To highGlucose, To lowGlucose, To normal or no changeGlucose, To highPot, To lowPot, To normal or no changePot, To highSodium, To lowSodium, To normal or no changeSodium, To high
Paroxetine 40 mg, GSKT- Fasted019001900190019001900190019001900190
Paroxetine 40 mg, Mississauga- Fasted019001900190019001900190019001900190

[back to top]

Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) and Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Indicated Time-points Under Fed Condition

Vital signs including DBP and SBP were measured at the indicated time-points and summarized during the study to evaluate the safety of the participants. Data has been presented treatment-wise. (NCT03329573)
Timeframe: Day 1 (post-dose), Day 2 (post-dose), Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 11, Day 12 (pre-dose), Day 12 (post-dose), Day 13 (post-dose), Day 14, Day 15, Day 16

,
InterventionMillimeters of mercury (Mean)
DBP, Day 1 (post-dose), n=23,24DBP, Day 2 (post-dose), n=23,24DBP, Day 3, n=23,24DBP, Day 4, n=23,24DBP, Day 5, n=23,24DBP, Day 11, n=21,22DBP, Day 12 (pre-dose), n=21,22DBP, Day 12 (post-dose), n=20,22DBP, Day 13 (post-dose), n=20,22DBP, Day 14, n=20,22DBP, Day 15, n=20,22DBP, Day 16, n=20,22SBP, Day 1 (post-dose), n=23,24SBP, Day 2 (post-dose), n=23,24SBP, Day 3, n=23,24SBP, Day 4, n=23,24SBP, Day 5, n=23,24SBP, Day 11, n=21,22SBP, Day 12 (pre-dose), n=21,22SBP, Day 12 (post-dose), n=20,22SBP, Day 13 (post-dose), n=20,22SBP, Day 14, n=20,22SBP, Day 15, n=20,22SBP, Day 16, n=20,22
Paroxetine 40 mg, GSKT- Fed70.469.067.767.569.769.971.269.970.370.368.872.8112.4113.8112.9111.1109.2109.0107.2112.4111.4107.0107.3107.1
Paroxetine 40 mg, Mississauga- Fed67.866.864.566.168.970.572.772.272.971.770.473.9111.8111.0109.4110.9109.8110.6108.5112.4112.0105.5106.0105.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings for ECG Parameters Under Fasting Condition

A single 12-lead ECGs was obtained using an ECG machine that automatically calculates the heart rate and measures PR, QRS, QT and QTc intervals. Clinically significant abnormal ranges were: heart rate: lower :<50 beats per minute and upper: >110 beats per minute; QT: Upper: >400 msec; QTc: Upper: >450 msec; PR: lower: <110 msec and upper: >220 msec; QRS: lower: <60 msec and upper: >120 msec. The number of participants with abnormal findings for ECG parameters have been presented. Data has been presented treatment-wise. (NCT03329573)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day-7 to Day -1) and Day 16

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BaselineDay 16
Paroxetine 40 mg, GSKT- Fasted00
Paroxetine 40 mg, Mississauga- Fasted00

[back to top]

RR at Indicated Time-point Under Fasting Condition

Vital sign including RR was measured at the indicated time-point and summarized during the study to evaluate the safety of the participants. Data has been presented treatment-wise. (NCT03329573)
Timeframe: Day 11

InterventionBreaths per minute (Mean)
Paroxetine 40 mg, GSKT- Fasted19.2
Paroxetine 40 mg, Mississauga- Fasted19.4

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Paroxetine

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for the analysis of Cmax of Paroxetine. PK parameters were analyzed using non-compartmental analysis. (NCT04311463)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (0 hour) and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

InterventionNanograms per milliliter (Mean)
Paroxetine 20 mg (Test A)8.39
Paroxetine 20 mg (Reference B)8.83

[back to top]

Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (Kel) of Paroxetine

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for the analysis of Kel of Paroxetine. PK parameters were analyzed using non-compartmental analysis. (NCT04311463)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (0 hour) and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

InterventionPer hour (Mean)
Paroxetine 20 mg (Test A)0.0653
Paroxetine 20 mg (Reference B)0.0618

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs

Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), pulse rate, respiration rate and body temperature were measured in semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest. The clinically acceptable range included; SBP: 85 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) to 160 mmHg; DBP: 45 mmHg to 100 mmHg; pulse rate: 40 beats per minute to 110 beats per minute; respiration rate: 8 breaths per minute to 20 breaths per minute; body temperature: 35.5 degrees Celsius to 37.8 degrees Celsius. Number of participants with any abnormality in vital signs are presented. Data is presented treatment wise. (NCT04311463)
Timeframe: Up to 25 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Paroxetine 20 mg (Test A)0
Paroxetine 20 mg (Reference B)0

[back to top]

Percentage of AUC (0 to Infinity) Obtained by Extrapolation (%AUCex) of Paroxetine

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for the analysis of %AUCex of Paroxetine. PK parameters were analyzed using non-compartmental analysis. (NCT04311463)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (0 hour) and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

InterventionPercentage of AUCex (Mean)
Paroxetine 20 mg (Test A)7.95
Paroxetine 20 mg (Reference B)7.05

[back to top]

Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of Paroxetine

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for the analysis of t1/2 of Paroxetine. PK parameters were analyzed using non-compartmental analysis. (NCT04311463)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (0 hour) and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

InterventionHours (Median)
Paroxetine 20 mg (Test A)10.78
Paroxetine 20 mg (Reference B)11.32

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUC[0-t]) of Paroxetine

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for the analysis of AUC(0-t) of Paroxetine. PK parameters were analyzed using non-compartmental analysis. (NCT04311463)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (0 hour) and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

InterventionHour*nanograms per milliliter (Mean)
Paroxetine 20 mg (Test A)128.876
Paroxetine 20 mg (Reference B)150.549

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence that may occur in a research participant during clinical research phase of a drug or vaccine but which does not necessarily has a causal relationship with this. SAE is defined as any medical occurrence that, at any dose, put participants's life in risk or results in death, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and other important medical events according to medical or scientific judgement. (NCT04311463)
Timeframe: Up to 25 days

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Non-serious AEsSAEs
Paroxetine 20 mg (Reference B)70
Paroxetine 20 mg (Test A)70

[back to top]

Time of the Maximum Measured Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Paroxetine

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for the analysis of Tmax of Paroxetine. PK parameters were analyzed using non-compartmental analysis. (NCT04311463)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (0 hour) and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

InterventionHours (Median)
Paroxetine 20 mg (Test A)5.00
Paroxetine 20 mg (Reference B)5.00

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC[0-inf]) of Paroxetine

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for the analysis of AUC(0-inf) of Paroxetine. PK parameters were analyzed using non-compartmental analysis. (NCT04311463)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (0 hour) and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours post-dose

InterventionHour*nanograms per milliliter (Mean)
Paroxetine 20 mg (Test A)142.482
Paroxetine 20 mg (Reference B)160.143

[back to top]